the Mullah is both not overt and philhellenic.
sent1: the fact that something is not overt and it is not a kind of a thornbill does not hold if it is homiletic. sent2: if the icepick does not beset then the jurisdiction is not a kind of a ornithologist and does beset. sent3: the cassowary is both a thornbill and not non-homiletic. sent4: if the jurisdiction is not a ornithologist and besets then the ezo-yama-hagi is not an outing. sent5: the fact that the Mullah is a kind of overt thing that is philhellenic is false if the handwear is not philhellenic. sent6: the fact that if the ezo-yama-hagi does not out then the handwear is not philhellenic is true. sent7: the jurisdiction is not a kind of a ornithologist. sent8: that the Mullah is not overt and is philhellenic is incorrect if the handwear is not philhellenic. sent9: the Mullah is not non-premenstrual and outs. sent10: the icepick does not beset if either the cassowary is a thornbill or it is an erosion or both. sent11: the icepick does not beset if the cassowary is an erosion. sent12: if that the Mullah does not beset hold then the icepick is not overt but it beset.
sent3 -> int1: the cassowary is a thornbill.; int1 -> int2: the cassowary is a thornbill and/or it is a kind of an erosion.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the icepick does not beset.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the jurisdiction is not a ornithologist and does beset.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the ezo-yama-hagi is not outing.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the handwear is not philhellenic.; sent8 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the emanation is overt and/or it inflates cannulation.
sent1 -> int7: that the cassowary is not overt and it is not a thornbill is not right if it is homiletic.;
$hypothesis$ = the Mullah is both not overt and philhellenic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not overt and it is not a kind of a thornbill does not hold if it is homiletic. sent2: if the icepick does not beset then the jurisdiction is not a kind of a ornithologist and does beset. sent3: the cassowary is both a thornbill and not non-homiletic. sent4: if the jurisdiction is not a ornithologist and besets then the ezo-yama-hagi is not an outing. sent5: the fact that the Mullah is a kind of overt thing that is philhellenic is false if the handwear is not philhellenic. sent6: the fact that if the ezo-yama-hagi does not out then the handwear is not philhellenic is true. sent7: the jurisdiction is not a kind of a ornithologist. sent8: that the Mullah is not overt and is philhellenic is incorrect if the handwear is not philhellenic. sent9: the Mullah is not non-premenstrual and outs. sent10: the icepick does not beset if either the cassowary is a thornbill or it is an erosion or both. sent11: the icepick does not beset if the cassowary is an erosion. sent12: if that the Mullah does not beset hold then the icepick is not overt but it beset. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the cassowary is a thornbill.; int1 -> int2: the cassowary is a thornbill and/or it is a kind of an erosion.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the icepick does not beset.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the jurisdiction is not a ornithologist and does beset.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the ezo-yama-hagi is not outing.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the handwear is not philhellenic.; sent8 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__