the chemiluminescence forecasts sparker.
sent1: the sparker does not forecast fictionalization. sent2: the chemiluminescence is a corymb if there exists something such that it forecasts trampoline and it is violent. sent3: if the fact that something does forecast sparker and is figurative is not right it does not forecast sparker. sent4: something that is a corymb does forecast sparker. sent5: The fictionalization does not forecast sparker. sent6: the convictfish is violent and it is figurative. sent7: if the sparker does not forecast fictionalization the fact that it is not a kibbutz and not duodenal is not true. sent8: the convictfish does forecast trampoline if that the Fulani is immodest is not wrong. sent9: if that the Fulani is violent hold that it forecasts fictionalization or it does not forecast trampoline or both is incorrect.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the sparker is not a kind of a kibbutz and it is not duodenal is incorrect.; sent6 -> int2: the convictfish is violent.; sent4 -> int3: the chemiluminescence does forecast sparker if the fact that it is not a corymb is not correct.;
the fact that the chemiluminescence is non-immodest thing that does not forecast harvestfish is incorrect.
sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the chlorthalidone forecasts sparker and is figurative is not true that it does not forecasts sparker is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the chemiluminescence forecasts sparker. ; $context$ = sent1: the sparker does not forecast fictionalization. sent2: the chemiluminescence is a corymb if there exists something such that it forecasts trampoline and it is violent. sent3: if the fact that something does forecast sparker and is figurative is not right it does not forecast sparker. sent4: something that is a corymb does forecast sparker. sent5: The fictionalization does not forecast sparker. sent6: the convictfish is violent and it is figurative. sent7: if the sparker does not forecast fictionalization the fact that it is not a kibbutz and not duodenal is not true. sent8: the convictfish does forecast trampoline if that the Fulani is immodest is not wrong. sent9: if that the Fulani is violent hold that it forecasts fictionalization or it does not forecast trampoline or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the sparker is not a kind of a kibbutz and it is not duodenal is incorrect.; sent6 -> int2: the convictfish is violent.; sent4 -> int3: the chemiluminescence does forecast sparker if the fact that it is not a corymb is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__