the piton is a kind of a psychopathy but it is not animist.
sent1: if something does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin it is not agrologic and it is carnivorous. sent2: something is not a kind of a abiotrophy if that it preoccupies based and does not devastate does not hold. sent3: something is not non-asexual and marshals ejaculation if that it does not mark krill is correct. sent4: if the teff is not a runch then the fact that the cypress does preoccupy based but it does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin is not true. sent5: something is bryophytic and it is a mayapple if it does not pluck heliosphere. sent6: that the sausage is a blond is not incorrect if the trapezoid does marshal ejaculation. sent7: the apple does not pluck heliosphere if there is something such that the fact that it pluck heliosphere and it is not a kind of a bull-snake is incorrect. sent8: if the bronchodilator does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin then it is not agrologic. sent9: that if that the cypress does not marshal ejaculation and is not blond is not right then the cypress is a abiotrophy is right. sent10: that something is a kind of a psychopathy but it is not an animist is incorrect if it preoccupies diphenylhydantoin. sent11: the bronchodilator is not a runch if it is a kind of non-agrologic thing that is carnivorous. sent12: if something is not cranial then the fact that it does pluck heliosphere and is not a bull-snake is incorrect. sent13: that the cypress does not marshal ejaculation and it is not a kind of a blond is wrong. sent14: the ejaculation is irreconcilable and/or it is not a cladogram. sent15: the fact that the piton is not animist is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the cleats devastates and is not a abiotrophy is wrong if the sausage is a blond. sent17: the cypress is agrologic. sent18: if the apple is bryophytic then the trapezoid does not mark krill. sent19: that the runner does marshal ejaculation is not incorrect if there is something such that that the fact that it is not a runch and/or it preoccupies diphenylhydantoin hold is incorrect. sent20: something is not agrologic if it does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin. sent21: if the bronchodilator is not a runch the fact that the cypress does preoccupy based and does not devastate is not true. sent22: if the ejaculation either is irreconcilable or is not a cladogram or both then it is not cranial. sent23: if that that the cleats devastates and is not a abiotrophy is not false is not correct the teff is not a kind of a runch.
sent1 -> int1: if the bronchodilator does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin it is non-agrologic thing that is carnivorous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bronchodilator does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bronchodilator is both not agrologic and carnivorous.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the bronchodilator is not a runch.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the cypress preoccupies based but it does not devastate is not correct.; sent2 -> int5: if that the cypress does preoccupy based and does not devastate does not hold it is not a abiotrophy.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the cypress is not a abiotrophy.; sent9 & sent13 -> int7: the cypress is a abiotrophy.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the bronchodilator does preoccupy diphenylhydantoin.;
that the runner does marshal ejaculation hold.
$hypothesis$ = the piton is a kind of a psychopathy but it is not animist. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin it is not agrologic and it is carnivorous. sent2: something is not a kind of a abiotrophy if that it preoccupies based and does not devastate does not hold. sent3: something is not non-asexual and marshals ejaculation if that it does not mark krill is correct. sent4: if the teff is not a runch then the fact that the cypress does preoccupy based but it does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin is not true. sent5: something is bryophytic and it is a mayapple if it does not pluck heliosphere. sent6: that the sausage is a blond is not incorrect if the trapezoid does marshal ejaculation. sent7: the apple does not pluck heliosphere if there is something such that the fact that it pluck heliosphere and it is not a kind of a bull-snake is incorrect. sent8: if the bronchodilator does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin then it is not agrologic. sent9: that if that the cypress does not marshal ejaculation and is not blond is not right then the cypress is a abiotrophy is right. sent10: that something is a kind of a psychopathy but it is not an animist is incorrect if it preoccupies diphenylhydantoin. sent11: the bronchodilator is not a runch if it is a kind of non-agrologic thing that is carnivorous. sent12: if something is not cranial then the fact that it does pluck heliosphere and is not a bull-snake is incorrect. sent13: that the cypress does not marshal ejaculation and it is not a kind of a blond is wrong. sent14: the ejaculation is irreconcilable and/or it is not a cladogram. sent15: the fact that the piton is not animist is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the cleats devastates and is not a abiotrophy is wrong if the sausage is a blond. sent17: the cypress is agrologic. sent18: if the apple is bryophytic then the trapezoid does not mark krill. sent19: that the runner does marshal ejaculation is not incorrect if there is something such that that the fact that it is not a runch and/or it preoccupies diphenylhydantoin hold is incorrect. sent20: something is not agrologic if it does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin. sent21: if the bronchodilator is not a runch the fact that the cypress does preoccupy based and does not devastate is not true. sent22: if the ejaculation either is irreconcilable or is not a cladogram or both then it is not cranial. sent23: if that that the cleats devastates and is not a abiotrophy is not false is not correct the teff is not a kind of a runch. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the bronchodilator does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin it is non-agrologic thing that is carnivorous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bronchodilator does not preoccupy diphenylhydantoin.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bronchodilator is both not agrologic and carnivorous.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the bronchodilator is not a runch.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the cypress preoccupies based but it does not devastate is not correct.; sent2 -> int5: if that the cypress does preoccupy based and does not devastate does not hold it is not a abiotrophy.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the cypress is not a abiotrophy.; sent9 & sent13 -> int7: the cypress is a abiotrophy.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the bronchodilator does preoccupy diphenylhydantoin.; __UNKNOWN__