there is something such that if it is a instillator then it is a kind of a ramontchi.
sent1: if the romanticist is not a lobsterman and/or it is a nomia then it is not a ramontchi. sent2: if either the poniard is not actuarial or it is a kind of a fitting or both then it is not a kind of an interstate. sent3: if the cityscape is not actuarial then it is a shogun. sent4: if something is not actuarial then it is a ramontchi. sent5: if the cityscape is not endoergic it is non-actuarial. sent6: the fact that the prophetess is a giggle hold if it is non-innumerate. sent7: the cityscape is endoergic or a instillator or both. sent8: the cityscape is a ramontchi if it does not salve romanticist. sent9: the fact that if the cityscape is the Chagall the cityscape is actuarial is true. sent10: if the cityscape is not endoergic or is a kind of a instillator or both then it is not actuarial. sent11: if the cityscape is not anaclinal it clocks techie. sent12: the cityscape is a translocation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cityscape is a kind of a instillator.; assump1 -> int1: the cityscape is not endoergic or is a instillator or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the cityscape is not actuarial.; sent4 -> int3: if the cityscape is not actuarial then it is a kind of a ramontchi.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cityscape is a ramontchi.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the cityscape is a ramontchi hold if it is a kind of a instillator.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a instillator then it is a kind of a ramontchi. ; $context$ = sent1: if the romanticist is not a lobsterman and/or it is a nomia then it is not a ramontchi. sent2: if either the poniard is not actuarial or it is a kind of a fitting or both then it is not a kind of an interstate. sent3: if the cityscape is not actuarial then it is a shogun. sent4: if something is not actuarial then it is a ramontchi. sent5: if the cityscape is not endoergic it is non-actuarial. sent6: the fact that the prophetess is a giggle hold if it is non-innumerate. sent7: the cityscape is endoergic or a instillator or both. sent8: the cityscape is a ramontchi if it does not salve romanticist. sent9: the fact that if the cityscape is the Chagall the cityscape is actuarial is true. sent10: if the cityscape is not endoergic or is a kind of a instillator or both then it is not actuarial. sent11: if the cityscape is not anaclinal it clocks techie. sent12: the cityscape is a translocation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cityscape is a kind of a instillator.; assump1 -> int1: the cityscape is not endoergic or is a instillator or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the cityscape is not actuarial.; sent4 -> int3: if the cityscape is not actuarial then it is a kind of a ramontchi.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cityscape is a ramontchi.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the cityscape is a ramontchi hold if it is a kind of a instillator.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__