that the no-trump does not occur and the indoctrination does not occur does not hold.
sent1: if the parcellation occurs then that the falsifying does not occur and the decreasing coulomb does not occur does not hold. sent2: the fact that the faro does not occur and the scorcher occurs is incorrect. sent3: if the pneumaticsness happens then the bivalve does not occur and the falsifying does not occur. sent4: either the falsifying does not occur or the decreasing coulomb occurs or both. sent5: if either the falsifying does not occur or the decreasing coulomb does not occur or both then the parcellation does not occur. sent6: the faro does not occur and the scorcher does not occur. sent7: that the faro happens and the scorcher does not occur is not correct. sent8: that the bivalve does not occur hold if that the falsifying does not occur and the decreasing coulomb does not occur is not right. sent9: the bivalve does not occur. sent10: the fact that the fact that the faro happens but the scorcher does not occur is false is not incorrect if the pneumaticsness does not occur. sent11: if the parcellation does not occur the no-trump does not occur. sent12: that the decreasing coulomb does not occur prevents the parcellation. sent13: if the pneumaticsness does not occur then that the faro does not occur and the scorcher does not occur is false. sent14: the bivalve does not occur if the pneumaticsness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the parcellation does not occur is correct the fact that the no-trump does not occur and the indoctrination does not occur hold. sent16: the fact that not the enfeoffing Zeitgeist but the Javaneseness occurs is wrong if the tune-up does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pneumaticsness does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the faro does not occur and the scorcher does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pneumaticsness happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the bivalve does not occur and the falsifying does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the falsifying does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the falsifying does not occur and/or the decreasing coulomb does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the parcellation does not occur.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the creaming practice does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the no-trump does not occur and the indoctrination does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the parcellation occurs then that the falsifying does not occur and the decreasing coulomb does not occur does not hold. sent2: the fact that the faro does not occur and the scorcher occurs is incorrect. sent3: if the pneumaticsness happens then the bivalve does not occur and the falsifying does not occur. sent4: either the falsifying does not occur or the decreasing coulomb occurs or both. sent5: if either the falsifying does not occur or the decreasing coulomb does not occur or both then the parcellation does not occur. sent6: the faro does not occur and the scorcher does not occur. sent7: that the faro happens and the scorcher does not occur is not correct. sent8: that the bivalve does not occur hold if that the falsifying does not occur and the decreasing coulomb does not occur is not right. sent9: the bivalve does not occur. sent10: the fact that the fact that the faro happens but the scorcher does not occur is false is not incorrect if the pneumaticsness does not occur. sent11: if the parcellation does not occur the no-trump does not occur. sent12: that the decreasing coulomb does not occur prevents the parcellation. sent13: if the pneumaticsness does not occur then that the faro does not occur and the scorcher does not occur is false. sent14: the bivalve does not occur if the pneumaticsness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the parcellation does not occur is correct the fact that the no-trump does not occur and the indoctrination does not occur hold. sent16: the fact that not the enfeoffing Zeitgeist but the Javaneseness occurs is wrong if the tune-up does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pneumaticsness does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the faro does not occur and the scorcher does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pneumaticsness happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the bivalve does not occur and the falsifying does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the falsifying does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the falsifying does not occur and/or the decreasing coulomb does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the parcellation does not occur.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__