that the seabag is not electromechanical but it is a Berkshire does not hold if the Jesuit is a muzzle.
sent1: if something is electromechanical that it does not irradiate and is a kind of a purist is false. sent2: the fact that the seabag is electromechanical and it is a Berkshire is incorrect if the Jesuit is a muzzle. sent3: the fact that the seabag is a kind of non-electromechanical a Berkshire is wrong if that the Boniface is not non-electromechanical is not incorrect. sent4: if that the Jesuit does broil lancetfish and it is a Lipmann is not true it does not muzzle. sent5: the fact that the Jesuit broils lancetfish and is a Berkshire does not hold if the seabag does not broils lancetfish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Boniface is electromechanical.; assump1 -> int1: there are electromechanical things.;
the fact that the fact that the Jesuit does not irradiate and is a purist is not true hold.
sent1 -> int2: the fact that the Jesuit does not irradiate but it is a purist is false if it is electromechanical.;
$hypothesis$ = that the seabag is not electromechanical but it is a Berkshire does not hold if the Jesuit is a muzzle. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is electromechanical that it does not irradiate and is a kind of a purist is false. sent2: the fact that the seabag is electromechanical and it is a Berkshire is incorrect if the Jesuit is a muzzle. sent3: the fact that the seabag is a kind of non-electromechanical a Berkshire is wrong if that the Boniface is not non-electromechanical is not incorrect. sent4: if that the Jesuit does broil lancetfish and it is a Lipmann is not true it does not muzzle. sent5: the fact that the Jesuit broils lancetfish and is a Berkshire does not hold if the seabag does not broils lancetfish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Boniface is electromechanical.; assump1 -> int1: there are electromechanical things.; __UNKNOWN__