the lecturing dispensation but not the arthralgicness occurs.
sent1: the scudding does not occur. sent2: both the lecturing dispensation and the baffling happens. sent3: if the hypotonicness occurs then the opisthognathousness occurs. sent4: if the scudding does not occur then both the hop and the hypotonicness happens. sent5: the palatalizing Afro but not the syndication occurs. sent6: the fact that the lecturing tooth happens or the packableness occurs or both is not wrong. sent7: if the potentness does not occur then the battery occurs. sent8: the fact that that the stewing happens prevents that the backstopping grist does not occur is true. sent9: that the payment does not occur is brought about by that the fissileness happens. sent10: that the palatalizing astrakhan does not occur is brought about by that the non-proudness or the agreeableness or both occurs. sent11: the lecturing epigone occurs. sent12: that the backstopping grist and/or the lobarness happens prevents the opisthognathousness. sent13: that the inextricableness happens is not false. sent14: the salientness is prevented by that the lecturing Aframomum does not occur or the palatalizing RN does not occur or both. sent15: the arthralgicness does not occur if the stewing does not occur or the capture does not occur or both. sent16: the affinity does not occur. sent17: the stewing occurs and/or the capturing does not occur. sent18: the Danish occurs. sent19: both the Malawian and the tastelessness happens. sent20: the fact that the echoicness does not occur and/or the unprofitableness occurs is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stewing happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the backstopping grist occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the backstopping grist occurs or the lobarness occurs or both.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the opisthognathousness does not occur.; sent4 & sent1 -> int4: the hopping occurs and the hypotonicness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the hypotonicness occurs.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the opisthognathousness happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the stewing does not occur.; int8 -> int9: either the stewing does not occur or the capturing does not occur or both.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the arthralgicness does not occur.; sent2 -> int11: the lecturing dispensation occurs.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the lecturing dispensation and the non-arthralgicness happens is incorrect.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the lecturing dispensation but not the arthralgicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the scudding does not occur. sent2: both the lecturing dispensation and the baffling happens. sent3: if the hypotonicness occurs then the opisthognathousness occurs. sent4: if the scudding does not occur then both the hop and the hypotonicness happens. sent5: the palatalizing Afro but not the syndication occurs. sent6: the fact that the lecturing tooth happens or the packableness occurs or both is not wrong. sent7: if the potentness does not occur then the battery occurs. sent8: the fact that that the stewing happens prevents that the backstopping grist does not occur is true. sent9: that the payment does not occur is brought about by that the fissileness happens. sent10: that the palatalizing astrakhan does not occur is brought about by that the non-proudness or the agreeableness or both occurs. sent11: the lecturing epigone occurs. sent12: that the backstopping grist and/or the lobarness happens prevents the opisthognathousness. sent13: that the inextricableness happens is not false. sent14: the salientness is prevented by that the lecturing Aframomum does not occur or the palatalizing RN does not occur or both. sent15: the arthralgicness does not occur if the stewing does not occur or the capture does not occur or both. sent16: the affinity does not occur. sent17: the stewing occurs and/or the capturing does not occur. sent18: the Danish occurs. sent19: both the Malawian and the tastelessness happens. sent20: the fact that the echoicness does not occur and/or the unprofitableness occurs is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stewing happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the backstopping grist occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the backstopping grist occurs or the lobarness occurs or both.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the opisthognathousness does not occur.; sent4 & sent1 -> int4: the hopping occurs and the hypotonicness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the hypotonicness occurs.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the opisthognathousness happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the stewing does not occur.; int8 -> int9: either the stewing does not occur or the capturing does not occur or both.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the arthralgicness does not occur.; sent2 -> int11: the lecturing dispensation occurs.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__