that if the sesamoid trolls matted the fact that the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid but it dispenses does not hold is not right.
sent1: if the fact that the follicle is a tramontane hold then the fact that the sesamoid does not troll matted but it accelerates sesamoid does not hold. sent2: if the sesamoid does troll matted that the follicle accelerates sesamoid and dispenses does not hold. sent3: that that the follicle does not dispense but it trolls matted does not hold if the sesamoid is a tramontane is right. sent4: if something is a tramontane then it does troll matted. sent5: that the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid and does dispense is wrong if the sesamoid is a kind of a tramontane. sent6: the fact that the follicle does accelerate sesamoid and it does dispense is wrong. sent7: if something dispenses then the fact that it is not a tramontane and does not accelerate sesamoid does not hold. sent8: if the sesamoid trolls matted the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid and does dispense. sent9: if the sesamoid does troll matted then it is tramontane. sent10: that the follicle does not dispense but it trolls matted is not true. sent11: the follicle is not a reckoner but it is a NREM. sent12: that the fact that the follicle is not a tramontane but it trolls matted hold is not correct if the sesamoid accelerates sesamoid. sent13: the sesamoid is a kind of a cookstove. sent14: the fact that the sesamoid does not dispense and trolls matted is not true. sent15: if the sesamoid accelerates sesamoid then the fact that the follicle does not troll matted but it is a tramontane is wrong. sent16: that the sesamoid does not accelerate sesamoid but it trolls matted does not hold. sent17: the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid but it does dispense. sent18: if that the sesamoid is a tramontane is not wrong the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid but it dispenses. sent19: if the sesamoid is tramontane the fact that the follicle accelerates sesamoid and it dispenses is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sesamoid trolls matted.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the sesamoid is a tramontane.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: that the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid and dispenses is false.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the ai does not troll matted is not true.
sent4 -> int3: the ai does troll matted if the fact that it is a kind of a tramontane hold.; sent7 -> int4: if the sesamoid dispenses the fact that it is not a tramontane and it does not accelerate sesamoid is not right.; sent11 -> int5: something is not a reckoner but it is a kind of a NREM.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the sesamoid trolls matted the fact that the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid but it dispenses does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the follicle is a tramontane hold then the fact that the sesamoid does not troll matted but it accelerates sesamoid does not hold. sent2: if the sesamoid does troll matted that the follicle accelerates sesamoid and dispenses does not hold. sent3: that that the follicle does not dispense but it trolls matted does not hold if the sesamoid is a tramontane is right. sent4: if something is a tramontane then it does troll matted. sent5: that the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid and does dispense is wrong if the sesamoid is a kind of a tramontane. sent6: the fact that the follicle does accelerate sesamoid and it does dispense is wrong. sent7: if something dispenses then the fact that it is not a tramontane and does not accelerate sesamoid does not hold. sent8: if the sesamoid trolls matted the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid and does dispense. sent9: if the sesamoid does troll matted then it is tramontane. sent10: that the follicle does not dispense but it trolls matted is not true. sent11: the follicle is not a reckoner but it is a NREM. sent12: that the fact that the follicle is not a tramontane but it trolls matted hold is not correct if the sesamoid accelerates sesamoid. sent13: the sesamoid is a kind of a cookstove. sent14: the fact that the sesamoid does not dispense and trolls matted is not true. sent15: if the sesamoid accelerates sesamoid then the fact that the follicle does not troll matted but it is a tramontane is wrong. sent16: that the sesamoid does not accelerate sesamoid but it trolls matted does not hold. sent17: the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid but it does dispense. sent18: if that the sesamoid is a tramontane is not wrong the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid but it dispenses. sent19: if the sesamoid is tramontane the fact that the follicle accelerates sesamoid and it dispenses is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sesamoid trolls matted.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the sesamoid is a tramontane.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: that the follicle does not accelerate sesamoid and dispenses is false.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__