the Scythian assures and it is a escheat.
sent1: if something is indulgent then the darmstadtium preempts armada and is not unlikable. sent2: if something does not preempt armada then it assures and it is indulgent. sent3: the cornerstone is a personal. sent4: if the carrack does exceed Decapterus then the darmstadtium is not a taco. sent5: that the darmstadtium does not assure is right if the indinavir does assure and it is indulgent. sent6: there is something such that it is indulgent. sent7: if the darmstadtium does preempt armada but it is not unlikable it does drape impact. sent8: if that the indinavir exceeds friendliness is true the Scythian does assure. sent9: either the carrack does exceed Decapterus or it is not homostylous or both. sent10: if the fact that the carrack is not homostylous hold then the darmstadtium is not a kind of a taco. sent11: the Scythian is a escheat if the cornerstone is a kind of a personal. sent12: if the darmstadtium does drape impact but it is not a kind of a taco the indinavir does exceed friendliness.
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the darmstadtium does preempt armada and is not unlikable.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the darmstadtium drapes impact.; sent9 & sent4 & sent10 -> int3: the darmstadtium is not a taco.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the darmstadtium drapes impact and is not a kind of a taco.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the indinavir exceeds friendliness.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the Scythian assures.; sent11 & sent3 -> int7: the Scythian is a kind of a escheat.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the Scythian assures and it is a escheat is not right.
sent2 -> int8: if the fact that the indinavir does not preempt armada is correct it assures and it is indulgent.;
$hypothesis$ = the Scythian assures and it is a escheat. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is indulgent then the darmstadtium preempts armada and is not unlikable. sent2: if something does not preempt armada then it assures and it is indulgent. sent3: the cornerstone is a personal. sent4: if the carrack does exceed Decapterus then the darmstadtium is not a taco. sent5: that the darmstadtium does not assure is right if the indinavir does assure and it is indulgent. sent6: there is something such that it is indulgent. sent7: if the darmstadtium does preempt armada but it is not unlikable it does drape impact. sent8: if that the indinavir exceeds friendliness is true the Scythian does assure. sent9: either the carrack does exceed Decapterus or it is not homostylous or both. sent10: if the fact that the carrack is not homostylous hold then the darmstadtium is not a kind of a taco. sent11: the Scythian is a escheat if the cornerstone is a kind of a personal. sent12: if the darmstadtium does drape impact but it is not a kind of a taco the indinavir does exceed friendliness. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the darmstadtium does preempt armada and is not unlikable.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the darmstadtium drapes impact.; sent9 & sent4 & sent10 -> int3: the darmstadtium is not a taco.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the darmstadtium drapes impact and is not a kind of a taco.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the indinavir exceeds friendliness.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the Scythian assures.; sent11 & sent3 -> int7: the Scythian is a kind of a escheat.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__