that if the forgetting happens then the vaulting Naga does not occur and the forcing Ugric does not occur is not true.
sent1: the Methodistness happens. sent2: the heterocercalness occurs. sent3: the noncomprehensiveness does not occur. sent4: that both the tactfulness and the Methodistness occurs is not incorrect. sent5: the auditoriness occurs. sent6: if both the vaulting Naga and the forgetting occurs then the tactfulness does not occur. sent7: the non-auditoryness is prevented by that the residing does not occur. sent8: the fact that the vaulting Finland does not occur hold. sent9: if the residing does not occur then not the forcing Ugric but the auditoriness occurs. sent10: the splash occurs. sent11: the cribbage does not occur if the shrinkableness and the purifying squared occurs. sent12: the forcing brassiere does not occur if the fact that the forcing brassiere occurs and the vaulting Naga happens does not hold. sent13: the insecureness occurs. sent14: the logarithmicness happens and the content occurs. sent15: the purifying whitecup occurs and the trinucleateness happens. sent16: the accelerating happens. sent17: the residing does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the vaulting Naga happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the forgetting occurs hold.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the vaulting Naga and the forgetting happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the tactfulness does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the tactfulness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the vaulting Naga does not occur.; sent9 & sent17 -> int6: not the forcing Ugric but the auditoriness happens.; int6 -> int7: the forcing Ugric does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the vaulting Naga does not occur and the forcing Ugric does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the forcing brassiere does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that if the forgetting happens then the vaulting Naga does not occur and the forcing Ugric does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the Methodistness happens. sent2: the heterocercalness occurs. sent3: the noncomprehensiveness does not occur. sent4: that both the tactfulness and the Methodistness occurs is not incorrect. sent5: the auditoriness occurs. sent6: if both the vaulting Naga and the forgetting occurs then the tactfulness does not occur. sent7: the non-auditoryness is prevented by that the residing does not occur. sent8: the fact that the vaulting Finland does not occur hold. sent9: if the residing does not occur then not the forcing Ugric but the auditoriness occurs. sent10: the splash occurs. sent11: the cribbage does not occur if the shrinkableness and the purifying squared occurs. sent12: the forcing brassiere does not occur if the fact that the forcing brassiere occurs and the vaulting Naga happens does not hold. sent13: the insecureness occurs. sent14: the logarithmicness happens and the content occurs. sent15: the purifying whitecup occurs and the trinucleateness happens. sent16: the accelerating happens. sent17: the residing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the vaulting Naga happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the forgetting occurs hold.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the vaulting Naga and the forgetting happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the tactfulness does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the tactfulness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the vaulting Naga does not occur.; sent9 & sent17 -> int6: not the forcing Ugric but the auditoriness happens.; int6 -> int7: the forcing Ugric does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the vaulting Naga does not occur and the forcing Ugric does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__