the fact that there exists something such that if it is dipolar that it does not smack and is clonic does not hold is false.
sent1: the razor-fish is both not a smack and clonic if it is dipolar. sent2: the fact that something is not a jesting and does inflate is not correct if it is a kind of an epileptic. sent3: that something is not a smack but clonic is false if it is dipolar.
sent3 -> int1: if the fact that the razor-fish is dipolar hold then that it is both not a smack and clonic is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is dipolar that it does not smack and is clonic does not hold is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the razor-fish is both not a smack and clonic if it is dipolar. sent2: the fact that something is not a jesting and does inflate is not correct if it is a kind of an epileptic. sent3: that something is not a smack but clonic is false if it is dipolar. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the fact that the razor-fish is dipolar hold then that it is both not a smack and clonic is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__