if the tang is a warfarin then that the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble is not incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the coach does not include goldenseal and does warble is false. sent2: the coach does include goldenseal. sent3: the coach is not a warble if the tang is a warfarin. sent4: the coach is not a kind of a warble. sent5: the PC is a warfarin. sent6: the coach is asphaltic. sent7: something is not a kind of a warfarin if it is merciless. sent8: the teju is not merciless and is not hydrocephalic. sent9: if the tang is a warfarin then the coach does include goldenseal but it does not warble. sent10: the coach includes goldenseal but it does not warble. sent11: if that the coach includes goldenseal and is not a kind of a warble does not hold then the tang is merciless. sent12: if the fact that the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble does not hold the tang is merciless. sent13: something is not a kind of a particulate if it is Rousseauan. sent14: if the coach is merciless the tang is not a warfarin and does not include goldenseal. sent15: the tang restarts ravaging. sent16: the tang does include goldenseal. sent17: the fact that the tang is merciless if the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble is right. sent18: if the spillway is merciless it is not bioclimatic. sent19: the tang is merciless if the coach does warble. sent20: the coach is not a warble and not a warfarin.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that that the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble is wrong is right.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: the tang is merciless.; sent7 -> int2: the tang is not a warfarin if that it is merciless is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tang is not a kind of a warfarin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tang is a warfarin.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the tang is a warfarin then that the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the coach does not include goldenseal and does warble is false. sent2: the coach does include goldenseal. sent3: the coach is not a warble if the tang is a warfarin. sent4: the coach is not a kind of a warble. sent5: the PC is a warfarin. sent6: the coach is asphaltic. sent7: something is not a kind of a warfarin if it is merciless. sent8: the teju is not merciless and is not hydrocephalic. sent9: if the tang is a warfarin then the coach does include goldenseal but it does not warble. sent10: the coach includes goldenseal but it does not warble. sent11: if that the coach includes goldenseal and is not a kind of a warble does not hold then the tang is merciless. sent12: if the fact that the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble does not hold the tang is merciless. sent13: something is not a kind of a particulate if it is Rousseauan. sent14: if the coach is merciless the tang is not a warfarin and does not include goldenseal. sent15: the tang restarts ravaging. sent16: the tang does include goldenseal. sent17: the fact that the tang is merciless if the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble is right. sent18: if the spillway is merciless it is not bioclimatic. sent19: the tang is merciless if the coach does warble. sent20: the coach is not a warble and not a warfarin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that that the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble is wrong is right.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: the tang is merciless.; sent7 -> int2: the tang is not a warfarin if that it is merciless is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tang is not a kind of a warfarin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tang is a warfarin.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the coach does not include goldenseal and it is not a warble.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__