the kaoliang does dilapidate franchise.
sent1: the lutist is anasarcous if the hemoglobin is anasarcous. sent2: the lutist is not a kind of a palaver. sent3: if the hemoglobin smocks Chamaeleontidae then the fact that the lutist is not a self-service and it does not palaver is false. sent4: if the lutist is a mat the gueridon is a mat. sent5: the kaoliang is anasarcous if something is a zombie and is a satori. sent6: something that is not a kind of a palaver is a kind of a mat that is a kind of a zombie. sent7: the minocycline is not a Vulgate. sent8: if that the gueridon is not a cortisone is not wrong then the lutist is a cortisone that is a satori. sent9: if the fact that the minocycline is not a kind of a plantain and is a feud is not right it is not a feud. sent10: something is a mat if that it is non-self-service but not a palaver is incorrect. sent11: if that something is a zombie and a cortisone is not correct it does not dilapidate franchise. sent12: something is a mat if it is not a palaver. sent13: there is something such that it is a kind of a satori. sent14: there is something such that that it does dilapidate subjectivity is not wrong. sent15: the gueridon is not a kind of a zombie if the fact that the lutist is a zombie and/or is not a satori is not correct. sent16: the alehouse is a kind of a disparity if the editor is grassy. sent17: that the fluoroscope is anosmic thing that does not diverge is not right. sent18: the editor is nonclassical and it is grassy if the minocycline is not a feud. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is anosmic and does not diverge is not right the gueridon is not a cortisone. sent20: if the gueridon is not a satori that the kaoliang is a kind of a zombie and it is a cortisone is not true. sent21: something is anosmic but it does not diverge. sent22: that the minocycline is not a plantain and is a kind of a feud is not right if it is not a kind of a Vulgate. sent23: if the fact that the alehouse is a kind of a disparity is true then that the hypocrite is both not katabatic and a leitmotiv is false.
sent17 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is anosmic thing that does not diverge is not right.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the gueridon is not a cortisone.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the lutist is a kind of a cortisone that is a kind of a satori.; int3 -> int4: the lutist is a kind of a satori.; sent6 -> int5: if the lutist is not a palaver then it is a mat and is a zombie.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the lutist is a kind of a mat that is a zombie.; int6 -> int7: the lutist is a zombie.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the lutist is a zombie and it is a kind of a satori.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is a zombie and is a satori.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the kaoliang is anasarcous.;
the kaoliang does not dilapidate franchise.
$hypothesis$ = the kaoliang does dilapidate franchise. ; $context$ = sent1: the lutist is anasarcous if the hemoglobin is anasarcous. sent2: the lutist is not a kind of a palaver. sent3: if the hemoglobin smocks Chamaeleontidae then the fact that the lutist is not a self-service and it does not palaver is false. sent4: if the lutist is a mat the gueridon is a mat. sent5: the kaoliang is anasarcous if something is a zombie and is a satori. sent6: something that is not a kind of a palaver is a kind of a mat that is a kind of a zombie. sent7: the minocycline is not a Vulgate. sent8: if that the gueridon is not a cortisone is not wrong then the lutist is a cortisone that is a satori. sent9: if the fact that the minocycline is not a kind of a plantain and is a feud is not right it is not a feud. sent10: something is a mat if that it is non-self-service but not a palaver is incorrect. sent11: if that something is a zombie and a cortisone is not correct it does not dilapidate franchise. sent12: something is a mat if it is not a palaver. sent13: there is something such that it is a kind of a satori. sent14: there is something such that that it does dilapidate subjectivity is not wrong. sent15: the gueridon is not a kind of a zombie if the fact that the lutist is a zombie and/or is not a satori is not correct. sent16: the alehouse is a kind of a disparity if the editor is grassy. sent17: that the fluoroscope is anosmic thing that does not diverge is not right. sent18: the editor is nonclassical and it is grassy if the minocycline is not a feud. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is anosmic and does not diverge is not right the gueridon is not a cortisone. sent20: if the gueridon is not a satori that the kaoliang is a kind of a zombie and it is a cortisone is not true. sent21: something is anosmic but it does not diverge. sent22: that the minocycline is not a plantain and is a kind of a feud is not right if it is not a kind of a Vulgate. sent23: if the fact that the alehouse is a kind of a disparity is true then that the hypocrite is both not katabatic and a leitmotiv is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is anosmic thing that does not diverge is not right.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the gueridon is not a cortisone.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the lutist is a kind of a cortisone that is a kind of a satori.; int3 -> int4: the lutist is a kind of a satori.; sent6 -> int5: if the lutist is not a palaver then it is a mat and is a zombie.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the lutist is a kind of a mat that is a zombie.; int6 -> int7: the lutist is a zombie.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the lutist is a zombie and it is a kind of a satori.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is a zombie and is a satori.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the kaoliang is anasarcous.; __UNKNOWN__