the dexamethasone is not husbandly and it does not descry quarreler.
sent1: if the speller does not descry quarreler the fact that the dexamethasone is not husbandly but it does descry quarreler is false. sent2: the laryngoscope does not grade if that the speller does not descry drawers and it is not yeasty is true. sent3: if the fact that the caustic is not a grade and does not lace combativeness is not true the spectroscope is a subfigure. sent4: if the Venushair is not a kind of a nudge but it is a kind of a subfigure then the spectroscope is not a kind of a subfigure. sent5: the encaustic is not cataphatic. sent6: the speller does not descry drawers. sent7: that the speller is not yeasty and is not a grade is wrong. sent8: that the dexamethasone is husbandly and does not lace combativeness is wrong. sent9: the fact that the speller descries quarreler is wrong if that it does not descry drawers and it is not yeasty does not hold. sent10: the Venushair is not a subfigure if there exists something such that it is not cataphatic. sent11: the dexamethasone does not grade. sent12: the fact that the dexamethasone is a kind of non-husbandly thing that does not descry quarreler is not true if the speller does not descry quarreler. sent13: if the Venushair does not nudge and it is not a kind of a subfigure the spectroscope is not a subfigure. sent14: something is not husbandly and it does not descry quarreler if it does not lace combativeness. sent15: the fact that the encaustic is both not husbandly and not cataphatic does not hold. sent16: the fact that the caustic is not a kind of a grade and does not lace combativeness is not right if the laryngoscope is not a grade. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not cataphatic is right then the Venushair is not a nudge and it is not a kind of a subfigure.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the speller does not descry drawers and it is not yeasty.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the laryngoscope does not grade is right.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the caustic is not a kind of a grade and does not lace combativeness does not hold.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the spectroscope is a kind of a subfigure.; sent5 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not cataphatic.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the Venushair is not a nudge and it is not a subfigure.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the spectroscope is not a kind of a subfigure.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the speller does not descry drawers and it is not yeasty does not hold.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the speller does not descry quarreler.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the dexamethasone is not husbandly and it does not descry quarreler.
sent14 -> int10: if the speller does not lace combativeness then it is not husbandly and does not descry quarreler.;
$hypothesis$ = the dexamethasone is not husbandly and it does not descry quarreler. ; $context$ = sent1: if the speller does not descry quarreler the fact that the dexamethasone is not husbandly but it does descry quarreler is false. sent2: the laryngoscope does not grade if that the speller does not descry drawers and it is not yeasty is true. sent3: if the fact that the caustic is not a grade and does not lace combativeness is not true the spectroscope is a subfigure. sent4: if the Venushair is not a kind of a nudge but it is a kind of a subfigure then the spectroscope is not a kind of a subfigure. sent5: the encaustic is not cataphatic. sent6: the speller does not descry drawers. sent7: that the speller is not yeasty and is not a grade is wrong. sent8: that the dexamethasone is husbandly and does not lace combativeness is wrong. sent9: the fact that the speller descries quarreler is wrong if that it does not descry drawers and it is not yeasty does not hold. sent10: the Venushair is not a subfigure if there exists something such that it is not cataphatic. sent11: the dexamethasone does not grade. sent12: the fact that the dexamethasone is a kind of non-husbandly thing that does not descry quarreler is not true if the speller does not descry quarreler. sent13: if the Venushair does not nudge and it is not a kind of a subfigure the spectroscope is not a subfigure. sent14: something is not husbandly and it does not descry quarreler if it does not lace combativeness. sent15: the fact that the encaustic is both not husbandly and not cataphatic does not hold. sent16: the fact that the caustic is not a kind of a grade and does not lace combativeness is not right if the laryngoscope is not a grade. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not cataphatic is right then the Venushair is not a nudge and it is not a kind of a subfigure. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the speller does not descry drawers and it is not yeasty.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the laryngoscope does not grade is right.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the caustic is not a kind of a grade and does not lace combativeness does not hold.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the spectroscope is a kind of a subfigure.; sent5 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not cataphatic.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the Venushair is not a nudge and it is not a subfigure.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the spectroscope is not a kind of a subfigure.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the speller does not descry drawers and it is not yeasty does not hold.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the speller does not descry quarreler.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__