the fact that the nine-spot is a kind of a Bangladeshi and/or does bide is not true.
sent1: the nine-spot is not Bangladeshi but it bides if the macadamia is a cefotaxime. sent2: if the fact that the bedspread is not a Melbourne is correct the bodega is a cefotaxime. sent3: if the infant's-breath does not reimburse Arthur the nine-spot does not weld levee and reimburse Arthur. sent4: if something welds Peloponnese and is a Nazarene it does not rustle zeal. sent5: if the pieplant does not rustle zeal then that the infant's-breath does rustle zeal but it is not a paraquat does not hold. sent6: the pieplant welds Peloponnese. sent7: the fact that the infant's-breath reimburses Arthur and does not rustle zeal is not right if the nine-spot does not weld levee. sent8: something is a Nazarene if it is a kind of a paraquat. sent9: the pieplant is a kind of a Nazarene. sent10: if that something does rustle zeal but it is not a paraquat does not hold it does not reimburse Arthur. sent11: something does not weld levee if it is not a Bangladeshi and bides. sent12: if something that does not weld levee reimburses Arthur then it bides. sent13: if the infant's-breath does not rustle zeal it does not reimburse Arthur. sent14: if something is not totemic then that it does reimburse hemstitch and does reimburse sack is not right. sent15: if the fact that the infant's-breath reimburses Arthur and does not rustle zeal is not true the posturer is a paraquat. sent16: the macadamia is a cefotaxime if the bodega is a cefotaxime. sent17: The Peloponnese welds pieplant.
sent4 -> int1: the pieplant does not rustle zeal if it welds Peloponnese and it is a Nazarene.; sent6 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the pieplant welds Peloponnese and it is a Nazarene hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pieplant does not rustle zeal.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the infant's-breath rustles zeal but it is not a paraquat is wrong.; sent10 -> int5: that the infant's-breath does not reimburse Arthur is right if that it rustles zeal and is not a kind of a paraquat does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the infant's-breath does not reimburse Arthur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the nine-spot does not weld levee and does reimburse Arthur.; sent12 -> int8: the nine-spot bides if it does not weld levee and it does reimburse Arthur.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the nine-spot bides.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the posturer is a Nazarene.
sent8 -> int10: if the posturer is a kind of a paraquat it is Nazarene.; sent11 -> int11: if the nine-spot is non-Bangladeshi thing that bides it does not weld levee.; sent14 -> int12: that the fact that the azadirachtin does reimburse hemstitch and reimburses sack is not incorrect does not hold if it is not totemic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the nine-spot is a kind of a Bangladeshi and/or does bide is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the nine-spot is not Bangladeshi but it bides if the macadamia is a cefotaxime. sent2: if the fact that the bedspread is not a Melbourne is correct the bodega is a cefotaxime. sent3: if the infant's-breath does not reimburse Arthur the nine-spot does not weld levee and reimburse Arthur. sent4: if something welds Peloponnese and is a Nazarene it does not rustle zeal. sent5: if the pieplant does not rustle zeal then that the infant's-breath does rustle zeal but it is not a paraquat does not hold. sent6: the pieplant welds Peloponnese. sent7: the fact that the infant's-breath reimburses Arthur and does not rustle zeal is not right if the nine-spot does not weld levee. sent8: something is a Nazarene if it is a kind of a paraquat. sent9: the pieplant is a kind of a Nazarene. sent10: if that something does rustle zeal but it is not a paraquat does not hold it does not reimburse Arthur. sent11: something does not weld levee if it is not a Bangladeshi and bides. sent12: if something that does not weld levee reimburses Arthur then it bides. sent13: if the infant's-breath does not rustle zeal it does not reimburse Arthur. sent14: if something is not totemic then that it does reimburse hemstitch and does reimburse sack is not right. sent15: if the fact that the infant's-breath reimburses Arthur and does not rustle zeal is not true the posturer is a paraquat. sent16: the macadamia is a cefotaxime if the bodega is a cefotaxime. sent17: The Peloponnese welds pieplant. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the pieplant does not rustle zeal if it welds Peloponnese and it is a Nazarene.; sent6 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the pieplant welds Peloponnese and it is a Nazarene hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pieplant does not rustle zeal.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the infant's-breath rustles zeal but it is not a paraquat is wrong.; sent10 -> int5: that the infant's-breath does not reimburse Arthur is right if that it rustles zeal and is not a kind of a paraquat does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the infant's-breath does not reimburse Arthur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the nine-spot does not weld levee and does reimburse Arthur.; sent12 -> int8: the nine-spot bides if it does not weld levee and it does reimburse Arthur.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the nine-spot bides.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__