that the mezzanine is not a luge is true.
sent1: the mezzanine is not semiautobiographical and strafes if the derrick is non-endergonic. sent2: if the crack is a tamarisk that it does not circularize cellphone and it is not a welcome is wrong. sent3: something is a kind of a skip that is a kind of a luge if it is not semiautobiographical. sent4: the electrocutioner is not separate and/or is not surficial. sent5: the mezzanine is not a luge if there is something such that it is not a separate or not surficial or both.
sent4 -> int1: something is not a kind of a separate and/or it is not surficial.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the mezzanine is a luge.
sent3 -> int2: if the mezzanine is not semiautobiographical it is both a skip and a luge.;
$hypothesis$ = that the mezzanine is not a luge is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the mezzanine is not semiautobiographical and strafes if the derrick is non-endergonic. sent2: if the crack is a tamarisk that it does not circularize cellphone and it is not a welcome is wrong. sent3: something is a kind of a skip that is a kind of a luge if it is not semiautobiographical. sent4: the electrocutioner is not separate and/or is not surficial. sent5: the mezzanine is not a luge if there is something such that it is not a separate or not surficial or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: something is not a kind of a separate and/or it is not surficial.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__