the fact that if the flower is not a iproclozide then the pollinium is a kind of corrupted thing that startles trouble does not hold.
sent1: if the tripe is not a reactionism and it is not dermal the pollinium does corrupt. sent2: if the flower is not a iproclozide it is not aleuronic and is not a sniffer. sent3: everything startles trouble and it dazzles. sent4: if the pollinium is not a kind of a sniffer the flower is not a dazzle and it is not a iproclozide. sent5: that the tripe is not a kind of a reactionism and it is not dermal if the flower is not aleuronic hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flower is not a kind of a iproclozide.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the flower is both not aleuronic and not a sniffer.; int1 -> int2: the flower is not aleuronic.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the tripe is not a kind of a reactionism and is not dermal.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the pollinium does corrupt.; sent3 -> int5: the pollinium does startle trouble and does dazzle.; int5 -> int6: the pollinium does startle trouble.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the pollinium corrupts and it startles trouble.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the flower is not a iproclozide then the pollinium is a kind of corrupted thing that startles trouble does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tripe is not a reactionism and it is not dermal the pollinium does corrupt. sent2: if the flower is not a iproclozide it is not aleuronic and is not a sniffer. sent3: everything startles trouble and it dazzles. sent4: if the pollinium is not a kind of a sniffer the flower is not a dazzle and it is not a iproclozide. sent5: that the tripe is not a kind of a reactionism and it is not dermal if the flower is not aleuronic hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flower is not a kind of a iproclozide.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the flower is both not aleuronic and not a sniffer.; int1 -> int2: the flower is not aleuronic.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the tripe is not a kind of a reactionism and is not dermal.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the pollinium does corrupt.; sent3 -> int5: the pollinium does startle trouble and does dazzle.; int5 -> int6: the pollinium does startle trouble.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the pollinium corrupts and it startles trouble.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__