the millionairess is not unbreakable.
sent1: if that something is not spectroscopic and is not a kind of a dolichocephaly is wrong it is not uncousinly. sent2: the fact that the hideout is tame is correct if there is something such that that it offers childhood and it is not a size is false. sent3: that something does not tease Myxinikela and is not a kind of a MArch is not correct if it tames. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it offers childhood and it is not a size does not hold. sent5: the millionairess is not unbreakable and does explain if there is something such that it is not uncousinly. sent6: the hideout does not tease Myxinikela and is not a MArch if there is something such that it is not a opalescence.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cone is not spectroscopic and it is not a dolichocephaly.; assump1 -> int1: something is not spectroscopic and not a dolichocephaly.; sent3 -> int2: if the hideout is tame the fact that it does not tease Myxinikela and it is not a kind of a MArch is false.; sent4 & sent2 -> int3: the hideout is tame.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hideout does not tease Myxinikela and it is not a MArch is incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the cone is not spectroscopic and it is not a kind of a dolichocephaly is false then it is not uncousinly.;
$hypothesis$ = the millionairess is not unbreakable. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not spectroscopic and is not a kind of a dolichocephaly is wrong it is not uncousinly. sent2: the fact that the hideout is tame is correct if there is something such that that it offers childhood and it is not a size is false. sent3: that something does not tease Myxinikela and is not a kind of a MArch is not correct if it tames. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it offers childhood and it is not a size does not hold. sent5: the millionairess is not unbreakable and does explain if there is something such that it is not uncousinly. sent6: the hideout does not tease Myxinikela and is not a MArch if there is something such that it is not a opalescence. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cone is not spectroscopic and it is not a dolichocephaly.; assump1 -> int1: something is not spectroscopic and not a dolichocephaly.; sent3 -> int2: if the hideout is tame the fact that it does not tease Myxinikela and it is not a kind of a MArch is false.; sent4 & sent2 -> int3: the hideout is tame.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hideout does not tease Myxinikela and it is not a MArch is incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the cone is not spectroscopic and it is not a kind of a dolichocephaly is false then it is not uncousinly.; __UNKNOWN__