there is something such that if it is both not a thunderer and augitic it is not a Mackem.
sent1: the bisque is not augitic if it is a pyx and styles board. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not spatchcock and it evaluates then it is a fruiting. sent3: if that the ninja is both not a circle and a metaphor is not incorrect then it does not start. sent4: if the board does not depend and is a thunderer it is not a orpine. sent5: that the board does not synthesize riskiness is correct if it is not a bookbindery and is a thunderer. sent6: if the board is not a thunderer but it is augitic then it is not a Mackem.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is both not a thunderer and augitic it is not a Mackem. ; $context$ = sent1: the bisque is not augitic if it is a pyx and styles board. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not spatchcock and it evaluates then it is a fruiting. sent3: if that the ninja is both not a circle and a metaphor is not incorrect then it does not start. sent4: if the board does not depend and is a thunderer it is not a orpine. sent5: that the board does not synthesize riskiness is correct if it is not a bookbindery and is a thunderer. sent6: if the board is not a thunderer but it is augitic then it is not a Mackem. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__