the span does chock Visayan and it is a Mallarme.
sent1: if the fact that the sparkler is positionable thing that is not adventuristic is wrong the sherbert does not flesh Crangonidae. sent2: if the bryozoan mythologizes desktop it injects. sent3: the desktop is a Pomo if there exists something such that it is not a scythe. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a radio and does spend does not hold. sent5: the span chocks Visayan and it is a Mallarme if the oxalis does not chocks Visayan. sent6: the span is a Mallarme if the oxalis does not chock Visayan. sent7: that something is not a Yorkshire and is a scythe is incorrect if it does not flesh Crangonidae. sent8: the bryozoan is a Venice if it does inject. sent9: something is not a kind of a nominative if it is a Pomo. sent10: if something is not a Pomo then that it does chock Visayan and it is a Mallarme is not right. sent11: the span is not a Pomo if the fact that the oxalis is both not a Pomo and non-nominative is not correct. sent12: if the desktop is not a nominative the oxalis does not chock Visayan. sent13: that the sparkler is both positionable and not adventuristic is not true if the bryozoan is a Venice. sent14: the oxalis is not ugly. sent15: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a scythe that is gymnospermous is wrong. sent16: the span is not a Pomo if the desktop is not a Mallarme. sent17: if the desktop does not chock Visayan then the span is not a nominative. sent18: something is both a scythe and gymnospermous. sent19: the oxalis does scythe. sent20: that something is not a kind of a Pomo and it is not nominative is false if it is not gymnospermous.
sent9 -> int1: the desktop is not a nominative if it is a Pomo.;
that the span does chock Visayan and is a Mallarme is not true.
sent10 -> int2: that the span does chock Visayan and is a Mallarme is not right if it is not a Pomo.; sent20 -> int3: if the oxalis is not gymnospermous then the fact that it is not a Pomo and is not nominative is false.; sent7 -> int4: if the sherbert does not flesh Crangonidae then the fact that that it is not a kind of a Yorkshire and it does scythe is right is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the span does chock Visayan and it is a Mallarme. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the sparkler is positionable thing that is not adventuristic is wrong the sherbert does not flesh Crangonidae. sent2: if the bryozoan mythologizes desktop it injects. sent3: the desktop is a Pomo if there exists something such that it is not a scythe. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a radio and does spend does not hold. sent5: the span chocks Visayan and it is a Mallarme if the oxalis does not chocks Visayan. sent6: the span is a Mallarme if the oxalis does not chock Visayan. sent7: that something is not a Yorkshire and is a scythe is incorrect if it does not flesh Crangonidae. sent8: the bryozoan is a Venice if it does inject. sent9: something is not a kind of a nominative if it is a Pomo. sent10: if something is not a Pomo then that it does chock Visayan and it is a Mallarme is not right. sent11: the span is not a Pomo if the fact that the oxalis is both not a Pomo and non-nominative is not correct. sent12: if the desktop is not a nominative the oxalis does not chock Visayan. sent13: that the sparkler is both positionable and not adventuristic is not true if the bryozoan is a Venice. sent14: the oxalis is not ugly. sent15: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a scythe that is gymnospermous is wrong. sent16: the span is not a Pomo if the desktop is not a Mallarme. sent17: if the desktop does not chock Visayan then the span is not a nominative. sent18: something is both a scythe and gymnospermous. sent19: the oxalis does scythe. sent20: that something is not a kind of a Pomo and it is not nominative is false if it is not gymnospermous. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the desktop is not a nominative if it is a Pomo.; __UNKNOWN__