the ornamental hypes strength and does not finish.
sent1: if something is not minimal that it is afebrile thing that is a kind of a breastplate is not right. sent2: the fact that something is amphitropous but it is not a Paralipomenon does not hold if it does not insert glycogen. sent3: the aircraft is a ricer. sent4: the aircraft is minimal. sent5: something that is an arrhythmia does not insert glycogen and is not a endlessness. sent6: the fluoroscope is a kind of a stadium and it is a shock if that it is not a know-how is right. sent7: if the ornamental is a kind of a breastplate the aircraft is both a ricer and not afebrile. sent8: if the megilp is not ineradicable then the fact that the smallmouth is reputable and it is a flunitrazepan is correct. sent9: that the ornamental does hype strength but it is not a kind of a finish is false if the aircraft is not a ricer. sent10: if the aircraft is not afebrile it is not minimal. sent11: something is an arrhythmia that does not wail if it is a kind of a stadium. sent12: the fluoroscope is epenthetic. sent13: the cortex is not minimal if the smallmouth is reputable and is a flunitrazepan. sent14: the fluoroscope is not a kind of a know-how if it is epenthetic. sent15: if the ornamental is a breastplate the aircraft is a kind of a ricer. sent16: the ornamental is a breastplate if it does not hype strength. sent17: if that something hypes strength and does not finish is false then it is a breastplate. sent18: if the fact that the cortex is a kind of afebrile thing that is a kind of a breastplate does not hold the aircraft is not a ricer.
sent17 -> int1: the ornamental is a breastplate if the fact that it does hype strength and it does not finish does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the ornamental hypes strength and does not finish does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ornamental is a kind of a breastplate.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the aircraft is a ricer but it is not afebrile.; int3 -> int4: the aircraft is not afebrile.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the aircraft is not minimal.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the ornamental does hype strength and is not a kind of a finish is false.
sent1 -> int7: if the cortex is not minimal the fact that it is afebrile thing that is a breastplate is not correct.; sent2 -> int8: that the fluoroscope is a kind of amphitropous thing that is not a kind of a Paralipomenon is wrong if it does not insert glycogen.; sent5 -> int9: if the fluoroscope is an arrhythmia it does not insert glycogen and it is not a endlessness.; sent11 -> int10: if the fluoroscope is a stadium it is a kind of an arrhythmia and it does not wail.; sent14 & sent12 -> int11: the fluoroscope is not a kind of a know-how.; sent6 & int11 -> int12: the fluoroscope is a stadium and it does shock.; int12 -> int13: the fluoroscope is a stadium.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the fluoroscope is an arrhythmia that does not wail.; int14 -> int15: the fluoroscope is an arrhythmia.; int9 & int15 -> int16: the fluoroscope does not insert glycogen and it is not a endlessness.; int16 -> int17: the fluoroscope does not insert glycogen.; int8 & int17 -> int18: that the fluoroscope is amphitropous and is not a Paralipomenon does not hold.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that that it is amphitropous and not a Paralipomenon is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the ornamental hypes strength and does not finish. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not minimal that it is afebrile thing that is a kind of a breastplate is not right. sent2: the fact that something is amphitropous but it is not a Paralipomenon does not hold if it does not insert glycogen. sent3: the aircraft is a ricer. sent4: the aircraft is minimal. sent5: something that is an arrhythmia does not insert glycogen and is not a endlessness. sent6: the fluoroscope is a kind of a stadium and it is a shock if that it is not a know-how is right. sent7: if the ornamental is a kind of a breastplate the aircraft is both a ricer and not afebrile. sent8: if the megilp is not ineradicable then the fact that the smallmouth is reputable and it is a flunitrazepan is correct. sent9: that the ornamental does hype strength but it is not a kind of a finish is false if the aircraft is not a ricer. sent10: if the aircraft is not afebrile it is not minimal. sent11: something is an arrhythmia that does not wail if it is a kind of a stadium. sent12: the fluoroscope is epenthetic. sent13: the cortex is not minimal if the smallmouth is reputable and is a flunitrazepan. sent14: the fluoroscope is not a kind of a know-how if it is epenthetic. sent15: if the ornamental is a breastplate the aircraft is a kind of a ricer. sent16: the ornamental is a breastplate if it does not hype strength. sent17: if that something hypes strength and does not finish is false then it is a breastplate. sent18: if the fact that the cortex is a kind of afebrile thing that is a kind of a breastplate does not hold the aircraft is not a ricer. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the ornamental is a breastplate if the fact that it does hype strength and it does not finish does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the ornamental hypes strength and does not finish does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ornamental is a kind of a breastplate.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the aircraft is a ricer but it is not afebrile.; int3 -> int4: the aircraft is not afebrile.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the aircraft is not minimal.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__