there exists something such that it is a kind of ectodermal thing that is not a payee.
sent1: the fact that the cab is not a bedstead and not agrologic is not correct. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a payee hold the ergonovine is not a bedstead and/or is ectodermal. sent3: the ergonovine is agrologic but it is not a kind of a payee. sent4: there exists something such that it is ectodermal. sent5: the forester is not a sportscaster. sent6: the ergonovine is not a bedstead. sent7: that the cab is not a kind of a bedstead but it is ectodermal is false if the adductor is not ectodermal. sent8: if the ebb is non-hydrostatic the forester is not agrologic. sent9: if the adductor is not ectodermal then the ergonovine is not a kind of a payee. sent10: the ebb is not hydrostatic if the cab is not a pad. sent11: either the ergonovine is not hydrostatic or it is a payee or both. sent12: either the plan is not a kind of a payee or it is agrologic or both. sent13: there exists something such that that it is agrologic is not false. sent14: the forester is not agrologic and/or does multiply micturition. sent15: that the fact that the plan does not multiply micturition and is not agrologic is not wrong is wrong if the forester is not agrologic. sent16: the ergonovine is not non-ectodermal but it is not a kind of a payee if the fact that the adductor is not non-ectodermal is not false. sent17: something is ectodermal and is a payee. sent18: the fact that the forester is both not a bedstead and agrologic is not correct. sent19: there is something such that it is a sportscaster. sent20: the cab does pad and/or it is a bedstead if there is something such that it is a sportscaster. sent21: the ebb is not hydrostatic if the cab is not a kind of a pad and/or it is a kind of a bedstead. sent22: if the fact that the plan does not multiply micturition and is non-agrologic is wrong then the adductor is not ectodermal. sent23: the adductor is not hydrostatic. sent24: that the adductor is not ectodermal hold if the plan is agrologic.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is a kind of ectodermal thing that is not a payee. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cab is not a bedstead and not agrologic is not correct. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a payee hold the ergonovine is not a bedstead and/or is ectodermal. sent3: the ergonovine is agrologic but it is not a kind of a payee. sent4: there exists something such that it is ectodermal. sent5: the forester is not a sportscaster. sent6: the ergonovine is not a bedstead. sent7: that the cab is not a kind of a bedstead but it is ectodermal is false if the adductor is not ectodermal. sent8: if the ebb is non-hydrostatic the forester is not agrologic. sent9: if the adductor is not ectodermal then the ergonovine is not a kind of a payee. sent10: the ebb is not hydrostatic if the cab is not a pad. sent11: either the ergonovine is not hydrostatic or it is a payee or both. sent12: either the plan is not a kind of a payee or it is agrologic or both. sent13: there exists something such that that it is agrologic is not false. sent14: the forester is not agrologic and/or does multiply micturition. sent15: that the fact that the plan does not multiply micturition and is not agrologic is not wrong is wrong if the forester is not agrologic. sent16: the ergonovine is not non-ectodermal but it is not a kind of a payee if the fact that the adductor is not non-ectodermal is not false. sent17: something is ectodermal and is a payee. sent18: the fact that the forester is both not a bedstead and agrologic is not correct. sent19: there is something such that it is a sportscaster. sent20: the cab does pad and/or it is a bedstead if there is something such that it is a sportscaster. sent21: the ebb is not hydrostatic if the cab is not a kind of a pad and/or it is a kind of a bedstead. sent22: if the fact that the plan does not multiply micturition and is non-agrologic is wrong then the adductor is not ectodermal. sent23: the adductor is not hydrostatic. sent24: that the adductor is not ectodermal hold if the plan is agrologic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__