the streak is not extropic.
sent1: the Bengali is not a Lyon. sent2: the fact that the Maltese does dissemble firebase but it is not a tusked does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a Lyon. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Lyon then that the Maltese does not dissemble firebase and is not a tusked is not true. sent4: the streak is extropic if the Maltese does not effect Dacrydium but it propagates. sent5: the Maltese is not a contrast if that it does not effect Dacrydium and it does propagate is wrong. sent6: if the Maltese is an inadequacy then it is a metazoan. sent7: if something is a metazoan then it is intelligible. sent8: if the Bengali is not intelligible then the Maltese is not a metazoan. sent9: something that does not contrast is an inadequacy. sent10: the Maltese is not intelligible if the fact that it does not dissemble firebase and it is not a kind of a tusked is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Maltese does not effect Dacrydium but it does propagate is not correct.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the Maltese is not a kind of a contrast.; sent9 -> int2: the Maltese is an inadequacy if it is not a contrast.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Maltese is an inadequacy hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the Maltese is a metazoan.; sent7 -> int5: the Maltese is not unintelligible if it is a kind of a metazoan.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Maltese is intelligible.; sent1 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a Lyon.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: that the Maltese does not dissemble firebase and it does not tusk is not true.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the Maltese is not intelligible.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the Maltese does not effect Dacrydium but it does propagate.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the streak is non-extropic.
$hypothesis$ = the streak is not extropic. ; $context$ = sent1: the Bengali is not a Lyon. sent2: the fact that the Maltese does dissemble firebase but it is not a tusked does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a Lyon. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Lyon then that the Maltese does not dissemble firebase and is not a tusked is not true. sent4: the streak is extropic if the Maltese does not effect Dacrydium but it propagates. sent5: the Maltese is not a contrast if that it does not effect Dacrydium and it does propagate is wrong. sent6: if the Maltese is an inadequacy then it is a metazoan. sent7: if something is a metazoan then it is intelligible. sent8: if the Bengali is not intelligible then the Maltese is not a metazoan. sent9: something that does not contrast is an inadequacy. sent10: the Maltese is not intelligible if the fact that it does not dissemble firebase and it is not a kind of a tusked is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Maltese does not effect Dacrydium but it does propagate is not correct.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the Maltese is not a kind of a contrast.; sent9 -> int2: the Maltese is an inadequacy if it is not a contrast.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Maltese is an inadequacy hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the Maltese is a metazoan.; sent7 -> int5: the Maltese is not unintelligible if it is a kind of a metazoan.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Maltese is intelligible.; sent1 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a Lyon.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: that the Maltese does not dissemble firebase and it does not tusk is not true.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the Maltese is not intelligible.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the Maltese does not effect Dacrydium but it does propagate.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__