the spectacle happens.
sent1: the unconventionalness is brought about by that the stress happens and the subdividing osmium occurs. sent2: the ineradicableness happens. sent3: the fact that the subdividing hibernation does not occur and the accessibleness does not occur is not right. sent4: that the avellanness and the spectacle occurs prevents that the vigil happens. sent5: the vigil happens if the subdividing hibernation happens. sent6: the avellanness and the ineradicableness occurs. sent7: the vigil occurs if that the subdividing hibernation does not occur and the accessibleness does not occur is false. sent8: if the avellanness does not occur or the interpreting Merrimack does not occur or both the interpreting Merrimack does not occur. sent9: that the subdividing hibernation but not the accessibleness happens is not right.
sent6 -> int1: the avellanness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectacle occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the avellanness happens and the spectacle occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the vigil does not occur is correct.; sent7 & sent3 -> int4: the vigil happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the interpreting Merrimack does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the spectacle happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the unconventionalness is brought about by that the stress happens and the subdividing osmium occurs. sent2: the ineradicableness happens. sent3: the fact that the subdividing hibernation does not occur and the accessibleness does not occur is not right. sent4: that the avellanness and the spectacle occurs prevents that the vigil happens. sent5: the vigil happens if the subdividing hibernation happens. sent6: the avellanness and the ineradicableness occurs. sent7: the vigil occurs if that the subdividing hibernation does not occur and the accessibleness does not occur is false. sent8: if the avellanness does not occur or the interpreting Merrimack does not occur or both the interpreting Merrimack does not occur. sent9: that the subdividing hibernation but not the accessibleness happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the avellanness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectacle occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the avellanness happens and the spectacle occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the vigil does not occur is correct.; sent7 & sent3 -> int4: the vigil happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__