either the buna undertakes or it is a Cook or both.
sent1: if something that magnetizes observation is a Scolytus that it is not a kind of a sewage is right. sent2: there exists something such that that it does not magnetize observation and it is a Scolytus is false. sent3: something is a kind of secretory a rerun. sent4: that the exporter does not magnetize observation and it is not a kind of a Scolytus is not true if there exists something such that it is not a sewage. sent5: that that the exporter does not magnetize observation but it is a Scolytus is true is false if that something is not a sewage hold. sent6: something is a kind of a sewage. sent7: if something is not a sewage then that it undertakes and/or it is a Cook is false. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a sewage. sent9: that the exporter does not magnetize observation and is a Scolytus is wrong. sent10: there is something such that that it is not a Scolytus and does not undertake is wrong. sent11: there exists something such that it does not undertake and it is not a Scolytus. sent12: the buna does undertake if there is something such that that it does not magnetize observation and is not a kind of a Scolytus is not true.
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the exporter does not magnetize observation and it is not a kind of a Scolytus does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does not magnetize observation and is not a Scolytus is not correct.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the buna does undertake.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the buna undertakes and/or is a Cook is not right.
sent7 -> int4: if the buna is not a sewage the fact that the fact that it either does undertake or is a Cook or both is not false is incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: if the buna magnetizes observation and is a Scolytus then it is not a sewage.;
$hypothesis$ = either the buna undertakes or it is a Cook or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that magnetizes observation is a Scolytus that it is not a kind of a sewage is right. sent2: there exists something such that that it does not magnetize observation and it is a Scolytus is false. sent3: something is a kind of secretory a rerun. sent4: that the exporter does not magnetize observation and it is not a kind of a Scolytus is not true if there exists something such that it is not a sewage. sent5: that that the exporter does not magnetize observation but it is a Scolytus is true is false if that something is not a sewage hold. sent6: something is a kind of a sewage. sent7: if something is not a sewage then that it undertakes and/or it is a Cook is false. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a sewage. sent9: that the exporter does not magnetize observation and is a Scolytus is wrong. sent10: there is something such that that it is not a Scolytus and does not undertake is wrong. sent11: there exists something such that it does not undertake and it is not a Scolytus. sent12: the buna does undertake if there is something such that that it does not magnetize observation and is not a kind of a Scolytus is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the exporter does not magnetize observation and it is not a kind of a Scolytus does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does not magnetize observation and is not a Scolytus is not correct.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the buna does undertake.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__