there is something such that if it is light-duty then it does not spring-clean Peripatidae.
sent1: the sunsuit is not implicational. sent2: if that the sunsuit profits is not wrong then it is not a Darwinian. sent3: something is a profit and is not sentient if it is Rosicrucian. sent4: if the sunsuit is light-duty and not a profit it does not spring-clean Peripatidae. sent5: the sunsuit is not a Moscow and not a Darwinian if that it profits is correct. sent6: if the fact that something does not necrose and is maxillodental does not hold then it does not spring-clean Peripatidae. sent7: that the madwoman is not a profit is correct if the sunsuit is a profit but it is not sentient. sent8: the cairngorm is not a Moscow and does not remove pensiveness. sent9: that the shirt is both not Neapolitan and not a Moscow is not correct. sent10: the sunsuit is not a kind of a Darwinian. sent11: if something that does not spring-clean Peripatidae is not a profit then the fact that it is not a phyllo is right. sent12: the Philistine is a Darwinian and is not a spoor. sent13: the sunsuit is a kind of a Rosicrucian and does remove Bantu if it is not a kind of a drunk. sent14: everything is light-duty and dances Morgan. sent15: the sunsuit is usual if it does profit. sent16: the fact that the sunsuit is not a Moscow but it is a Darwinian does not hold. sent17: there is something such that if it is light-duty it spring-cleans Peripatidae. sent18: the sunsuit is not phonetics.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sunsuit is a profit.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the sunsuit is both not a Moscow and not Darwinian.;
the madwoman is both light-duty and not a phyllo.
sent14 -> int2: the madwoman is light-duty and dances Morgan.; int2 -> int3: the madwoman is light-duty.; sent11 -> int4: if the madwoman does not spring-clean Peripatidae and does not profit then it is not a phyllo.; sent6 -> int5: that the madwoman does not spring-clean Peripatidae hold if the fact that it does not necrose and it is maxillodental is incorrect.; sent3 -> int6: if the sunsuit is a kind of a Rosicrucian it is a profit and not sentient.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is light-duty then it does not spring-clean Peripatidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the sunsuit is not implicational. sent2: if that the sunsuit profits is not wrong then it is not a Darwinian. sent3: something is a profit and is not sentient if it is Rosicrucian. sent4: if the sunsuit is light-duty and not a profit it does not spring-clean Peripatidae. sent5: the sunsuit is not a Moscow and not a Darwinian if that it profits is correct. sent6: if the fact that something does not necrose and is maxillodental does not hold then it does not spring-clean Peripatidae. sent7: that the madwoman is not a profit is correct if the sunsuit is a profit but it is not sentient. sent8: the cairngorm is not a Moscow and does not remove pensiveness. sent9: that the shirt is both not Neapolitan and not a Moscow is not correct. sent10: the sunsuit is not a kind of a Darwinian. sent11: if something that does not spring-clean Peripatidae is not a profit then the fact that it is not a phyllo is right. sent12: the Philistine is a Darwinian and is not a spoor. sent13: the sunsuit is a kind of a Rosicrucian and does remove Bantu if it is not a kind of a drunk. sent14: everything is light-duty and dances Morgan. sent15: the sunsuit is usual if it does profit. sent16: the fact that the sunsuit is not a Moscow but it is a Darwinian does not hold. sent17: there is something such that if it is light-duty it spring-cleans Peripatidae. sent18: the sunsuit is not phonetics. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sunsuit is a profit.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the sunsuit is both not a Moscow and not Darwinian.; __UNKNOWN__