the fact that there exists something such that if it effects onager then that it does not postulate and is boustrophedonic is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: the flower-of-an-hour is not cash-and-carry and does effect onager if it is a lodge. sent2: that something does not effect shamanism but it is valedictory if it is cortical hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is bacteriological the fact that it is a Arnhem and a shiitake does not hold. sent4: that something dissembles chervil and is antibacterial does not hold if it does effect information. sent5: there is something such that if it is a calculus the fact that it is a lame that dissembles baluster is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is digestible is right the fact that it does not effect temporal and it is a lacteal is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is balletic the fact that it is a kind of non-ecdemic thing that is vicinal is not correct. sent8: if something does effect onager the fact that it is not a kind of a postulate and is boustrophedonic is not true.
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the flower-of-an-hour is not a postulate but it is boustrophedonic is wrong if it effects onager.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it effects onager then that it does not postulate and is boustrophedonic is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the flower-of-an-hour is not cash-and-carry and does effect onager if it is a lodge. sent2: that something does not effect shamanism but it is valedictory if it is cortical hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is bacteriological the fact that it is a Arnhem and a shiitake does not hold. sent4: that something dissembles chervil and is antibacterial does not hold if it does effect information. sent5: there is something such that if it is a calculus the fact that it is a lame that dissembles baluster is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is digestible is right the fact that it does not effect temporal and it is a lacteal is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is balletic the fact that it is a kind of non-ecdemic thing that is vicinal is not correct. sent8: if something does effect onager the fact that it is not a kind of a postulate and is boustrophedonic is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the flower-of-an-hour is not a postulate but it is boustrophedonic is wrong if it effects onager.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__