that the bailor does not torture role and does not neglect is wrong.
sent1: that the striatum is a convection or it does not resettle striatum or both does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the striatum is a kind of a convection and/or it does resettle striatum is incorrect it is a paltriness. sent3: if the fact that the bismuth does not honey Conospermum and is not thalamocortical is wrong the deposition does not resettle Paridae. sent4: that the bismuth does not honey Conospermum and it is not thalamocortical is not right. sent5: something is taxonomic if it is a paltriness. sent6: the striatum is a paltriness if the fact that it is a convection and/or it does not resettle striatum is not right. sent7: that the guardrail is not a kind of a similarity hold if there exists something such that it is both not non-starry and not non-taxonomic. sent8: the bailor is not a neglect. sent9: the striatum is starry if that the deposition does not resettle Paridae is correct. sent10: if the bismuth is thalamocortical the fact that the deposition does not resettle Paridae is correct. sent11: if the guardrail is not a kind of a similarity then the bailor does not neglect. sent12: if the guardrail is not a similarity the bailor does not torture role and is not a kind of a neglect.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the deposition does not resettle Paridae.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the striatum is starry.; sent5 -> int3: if the striatum is a paltriness it is taxonomic.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the striatum is a paltriness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the striatum is taxonomic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the striatum is starry and it is taxonomic.; int6 -> int7: something is starry and it is taxonomic.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the guardrail is not a kind of a similarity.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the bailor does not torture role and does not neglect is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the striatum is a convection or it does not resettle striatum or both does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the striatum is a kind of a convection and/or it does resettle striatum is incorrect it is a paltriness. sent3: if the fact that the bismuth does not honey Conospermum and is not thalamocortical is wrong the deposition does not resettle Paridae. sent4: that the bismuth does not honey Conospermum and it is not thalamocortical is not right. sent5: something is taxonomic if it is a paltriness. sent6: the striatum is a paltriness if the fact that it is a convection and/or it does not resettle striatum is not right. sent7: that the guardrail is not a kind of a similarity hold if there exists something such that it is both not non-starry and not non-taxonomic. sent8: the bailor is not a neglect. sent9: the striatum is starry if that the deposition does not resettle Paridae is correct. sent10: if the bismuth is thalamocortical the fact that the deposition does not resettle Paridae is correct. sent11: if the guardrail is not a kind of a similarity then the bailor does not neglect. sent12: if the guardrail is not a similarity the bailor does not torture role and is not a kind of a neglect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the deposition does not resettle Paridae.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the striatum is starry.; sent5 -> int3: if the striatum is a paltriness it is taxonomic.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the striatum is a paltriness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the striatum is taxonomic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the striatum is starry and it is taxonomic.; int6 -> int7: something is starry and it is taxonomic.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the guardrail is not a kind of a similarity.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__