the fact that the scalding outerwear does not occur and the impassableness does not occur does not hold.
sent1: if the generation does not occur and the degeneration does not occur that the classification does not occur hold. sent2: the vignette does not occur if the fact that the conviction occurs and the effervescentness does not occur is not true. sent3: the fact that the conviction happens and the effervescentness does not occur is not right if the miscount occurs. sent4: if the scalding naboom occurs the lamplight occurs. sent5: that both the lamplight and the vignette occurs causes that the scalding outerwear does not occur. sent6: the miscounting happens if the psychoanalyticalness does not occur. sent7: the anasarcousness occurs. sent8: that the impassableness does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the vignette occurs. sent10: if the classification does not occur or the microwave does not occur or both the psychoanalyticalness does not occur. sent11: if either the scour does not occur or the demilitarizing does not occur or both the enthusing does not occur. sent12: the scour does not occur and/or the demilitarizing does not occur. sent13: the impressionist does not occur if the enthusing does not occur and the paternalness does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the scalding naboom happens but the scalding guitar does not occur is not true the anasarcousness does not occur. sent15: that the generation does not occur and the degeneration does not occur is brought about by the non-impressionistness. sent16: the fact that the scalding outerwear does not occur and the impassableness does not occur is not correct if the lamplight does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the scalding naboom occurs and the scalding guitar does not occur is incorrect.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the anasarcousness does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the scalding naboom occurs and the scalding guitar does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the scalding naboom occurs.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the lamplight occurs.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the lamplight happens and the vignette happens.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the scalding outerwear does not occur.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the scalding outerwear does not occur and the impassableness does not occur is wrong.
sent11 & sent12 -> int8: the enthusing does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the scalding outerwear does not occur and the impassableness does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the generation does not occur and the degeneration does not occur that the classification does not occur hold. sent2: the vignette does not occur if the fact that the conviction occurs and the effervescentness does not occur is not true. sent3: the fact that the conviction happens and the effervescentness does not occur is not right if the miscount occurs. sent4: if the scalding naboom occurs the lamplight occurs. sent5: that both the lamplight and the vignette occurs causes that the scalding outerwear does not occur. sent6: the miscounting happens if the psychoanalyticalness does not occur. sent7: the anasarcousness occurs. sent8: that the impassableness does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the vignette occurs. sent10: if the classification does not occur or the microwave does not occur or both the psychoanalyticalness does not occur. sent11: if either the scour does not occur or the demilitarizing does not occur or both the enthusing does not occur. sent12: the scour does not occur and/or the demilitarizing does not occur. sent13: the impressionist does not occur if the enthusing does not occur and the paternalness does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the scalding naboom happens but the scalding guitar does not occur is not true the anasarcousness does not occur. sent15: that the generation does not occur and the degeneration does not occur is brought about by the non-impressionistness. sent16: the fact that the scalding outerwear does not occur and the impassableness does not occur is not correct if the lamplight does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the scalding naboom occurs and the scalding guitar does not occur is incorrect.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the anasarcousness does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the scalding naboom occurs and the scalding guitar does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the scalding naboom occurs.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the lamplight occurs.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the lamplight happens and the vignette happens.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the scalding outerwear does not occur.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__