the fact that the utterer trivializes diversification and does not theme carry does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the utterer does stargaze and it is a kind of a backed is not true. sent2: if the utterer stargazes the fact that it is not uncooperative is true. sent3: the utterer is cooperative if the fact that it does not stargaze and it does back is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the utterer does not stargaze but it is a backed is not true. sent5: the utterer does not theme carry. sent6: if something is not uncooperative then it does trivialize diversification and does not theme carry. sent7: if something is cooperative it does not theme carry. sent8: the utterer does not theme carry if it is not uncooperative.
sent6 -> int1: if the utterer is not uncooperative it trivializes diversification and does not theme carry.; sent3 & sent4 -> int2: the utterer is not uncooperative.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the utterer trivializes diversification and does not theme carry does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the utterer does stargaze and it is a kind of a backed is not true. sent2: if the utterer stargazes the fact that it is not uncooperative is true. sent3: the utterer is cooperative if the fact that it does not stargaze and it does back is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the utterer does not stargaze but it is a backed is not true. sent5: the utterer does not theme carry. sent6: if something is not uncooperative then it does trivialize diversification and does not theme carry. sent7: if something is cooperative it does not theme carry. sent8: the utterer does not theme carry if it is not uncooperative. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the utterer is not uncooperative it trivializes diversification and does not theme carry.; sent3 & sent4 -> int2: the utterer is not uncooperative.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__