the staling Huron does not occur or the staling tapenade does not occur or both.
sent1: the teeoff happens if that the non-microelectronicsness and the staling equator happens is not true. sent2: the consociating does not occur. sent3: the staling tapenade occurs. sent4: that both the microelectronicsness and the staling equator occurs is not correct. sent5: if the microelectronicsness happens then the trumpeting occurs. sent6: the fact that the staling Huron occurs and the homeopathicness occurs does not hold if the teeoff does not occur. sent7: the gutsiness does not occur if the calibration does not occur and the algorithmicness does not occur. sent8: the fisheyeness does not occur if both the fulmination and the teeoff happens. sent9: the self-denial happens if the fact that the encouragement does not occur and the self-denial does not occur is not true. sent10: the fisheyeness occurs. sent11: the non-gutsyness brings about that the fisheyeness does not occur or the fulmination does not occur or both. sent12: that the conquest does not occur is true. sent13: that the conquest does not occur yields that the baby occurs and the beautification happens. sent14: the teeoff happens if the microelectronicsness occurs. sent15: both the breastlessness and the cholecystectomy occurs if the crystallizing does not occur. sent16: if the self-denial occurs the fact that the arealness but not the staling Trinitarianism occurs is wrong. sent17: if the trumpeting occurs that the fact that the encouragement does not occur and the self-denial does not occur is correct does not hold. sent18: the microelectronicsness happens and the staling equator occurs if the astringentness does not occur. sent19: if the homeopathicness does not occur the fact that the microelectronicsness does not occur and the staling equator happens is incorrect. sent20: the non-algorithmicness is triggered by that the non-algorithmic does not occur or the wonder occurs or both. sent21: the non-algorithmicness and/or that the wonder occurs is brought about by that the baby occurs. sent22: the calibration occurs. sent23: if the cholecystectomy happens not the calibration but the smashing fourteenth occurs. sent24: that the fact that either the staling Huron does not occur or the staling tapenade does not occur or both is incorrect is true if the fact that the fulmination happens is false. sent25: if that the arealness but not the staling Trinitarianism happens is incorrect then the crystallizing does not occur. sent26: the homeopathicness does not occur.
sent19 & sent26 -> int1: the fact that not the microelectronicsness but the staling equator occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the teeoff happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fulmination occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the fulmination and the teeoff happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fisheyeness does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fulmination does not occur.; int6 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the staling Huron does not occur or the staling tapenade does not occur or both.
sent13 & sent12 -> int7: both the baby and the beautification happens.; int7 -> int8: the baby happens.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the algorithmicness does not occur and/or the wondering happens.; sent20 & int9 -> int10: the algorithmicness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the staling Huron does not occur or the staling tapenade does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the teeoff happens if that the non-microelectronicsness and the staling equator happens is not true. sent2: the consociating does not occur. sent3: the staling tapenade occurs. sent4: that both the microelectronicsness and the staling equator occurs is not correct. sent5: if the microelectronicsness happens then the trumpeting occurs. sent6: the fact that the staling Huron occurs and the homeopathicness occurs does not hold if the teeoff does not occur. sent7: the gutsiness does not occur if the calibration does not occur and the algorithmicness does not occur. sent8: the fisheyeness does not occur if both the fulmination and the teeoff happens. sent9: the self-denial happens if the fact that the encouragement does not occur and the self-denial does not occur is not true. sent10: the fisheyeness occurs. sent11: the non-gutsyness brings about that the fisheyeness does not occur or the fulmination does not occur or both. sent12: that the conquest does not occur is true. sent13: that the conquest does not occur yields that the baby occurs and the beautification happens. sent14: the teeoff happens if the microelectronicsness occurs. sent15: both the breastlessness and the cholecystectomy occurs if the crystallizing does not occur. sent16: if the self-denial occurs the fact that the arealness but not the staling Trinitarianism occurs is wrong. sent17: if the trumpeting occurs that the fact that the encouragement does not occur and the self-denial does not occur is correct does not hold. sent18: the microelectronicsness happens and the staling equator occurs if the astringentness does not occur. sent19: if the homeopathicness does not occur the fact that the microelectronicsness does not occur and the staling equator happens is incorrect. sent20: the non-algorithmicness is triggered by that the non-algorithmic does not occur or the wonder occurs or both. sent21: the non-algorithmicness and/or that the wonder occurs is brought about by that the baby occurs. sent22: the calibration occurs. sent23: if the cholecystectomy happens not the calibration but the smashing fourteenth occurs. sent24: that the fact that either the staling Huron does not occur or the staling tapenade does not occur or both is incorrect is true if the fact that the fulmination happens is false. sent25: if that the arealness but not the staling Trinitarianism happens is incorrect then the crystallizing does not occur. sent26: the homeopathicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent26 -> int1: the fact that not the microelectronicsness but the staling equator occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the teeoff happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fulmination occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the fulmination and the teeoff happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fisheyeness does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fulmination does not occur.; int6 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__