that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of offshore thing that is not redemptive does not hold then it is not vibrational is false.
sent1: that if that the maar is the cytosol that is not vibrational is wrong the maar does comment is not wrong. sent2: if that the maar is redemptive is not incorrect it is not vibrational. sent3: if the fact that the maar is offshore but not redemptive is false that it is vibrational is true. sent4: if the fact that something is vibrational thing that does not champion accelerometer is wrong then it is not a kind of a skill. sent5: if the fact that something does champion tropopause but it is not redemptive is not true it does not hug maar. sent6: if that the maar is offshore but it is not redemptive is not right then it is not vibrational. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is a comment and it is not biflagellate is true it is not a characteristic. sent8: if the maar is a kind of offshore thing that is not redemptive it is not vibrational. sent9: there exists something such that if it is non-offshore it is not vibrational. sent10: there is something such that if it is offshore and it is not redemptive then it is not vibrational.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
that if that the maar does champion tropopause but it is not redemptive is not right then the maar does not hug maar is correct.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of offshore thing that is not redemptive does not hold then it is not vibrational is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that if that the maar is the cytosol that is not vibrational is wrong the maar does comment is not wrong. sent2: if that the maar is redemptive is not incorrect it is not vibrational. sent3: if the fact that the maar is offshore but not redemptive is false that it is vibrational is true. sent4: if the fact that something is vibrational thing that does not champion accelerometer is wrong then it is not a kind of a skill. sent5: if the fact that something does champion tropopause but it is not redemptive is not true it does not hug maar. sent6: if that the maar is offshore but it is not redemptive is not right then it is not vibrational. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is a comment and it is not biflagellate is true it is not a characteristic. sent8: if the maar is a kind of offshore thing that is not redemptive it is not vibrational. sent9: there exists something such that if it is non-offshore it is not vibrational. sent10: there is something such that if it is offshore and it is not redemptive then it is not vibrational. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__