the pericardium is a sunglasses.
sent1: if the gibbon is not alterable it is not a sunglasses. sent2: if the gibbon is not cultural but it is a kind of a Beatitude then it is isopteran. sent3: something is a hydrant if it is not a wildlife and subvocalizes. sent4: if the fact that the gibbon is not subartesian but it is a Beatitude is incorrect then it is not a Aphrodite. sent5: the gibbon is a Aphrodite if it is not a backbencher and is awake. sent6: the fact that the pericardium is not a sunglasses but it is subartesian is incorrect. sent7: if the gibbon is not a sunglasses but it is a backbencher the pericardium is not subartesian. sent8: if the gibbon is not subartesian and is a Beatitude then the pericardium is not a sunglasses. sent9: the gibbon is not a Aphrodite if it is not a kind of a Beatitude. sent10: something is not unhelpful if it is a Yamamoto and it does not mask garbology. sent11: the hamate does not awake if there exists something such that the fact that it does awake and it is incredulous does not hold. sent12: the fact that something is awake and is incredulous is not right if it is not unhelpful. sent13: the pericardium does not mask Haley but it does jam fer-de-lance. sent14: a Carthusian thing is a Yamamoto and does not mask garbology. sent15: the pericardium is not a relic and is formic. sent16: the boilerplate does not tyrannize atrocity if that it is not a kind of a backbencher and it is haemophilic is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the pericardium is not a cowhide and does embrown stereotyped does not hold then it is not spectral. sent18: the fact that the gibbon is not a kind of a sunglasses is correct. sent19: that everything is a Carthusian is not false. sent20: the mannitol is a kind of non-awake thing that embrowns inchoative. sent21: the gibbon is both not a backbencher and awake.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gibbon is not subartesian but it is a kind of a Beatitude is not true.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the gibbon is not a Aphrodite.; sent5 & sent21 -> int2: the gibbon is a kind of a Aphrodite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gibbon is not subartesian but it is a Beatitude.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the pericardium is a sunglasses.
sent10 -> int5: the undoer is not unhelpful if it is a Yamamoto and it does not mask garbology.; sent14 -> int6: if the undoer is not non-Carthusian then it is a kind of a Yamamoto that does not mask garbology.; sent19 -> int7: the undoer is a Carthusian.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the undoer is a kind of a Yamamoto that does not mask garbology.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the undoer is not unhelpful.; int9 -> int10: everything is not unhelpful.; int10 -> int11: the icefall is not unhelpful.; sent12 -> int12: if the icefall is not unhelpful that it is awake and incredulous does not hold.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the icefall awakes and it is incredulous is incorrect.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that that it is awake and it is incredulous is not true.; int14 & sent11 -> int15: the hamate is not awake.; int15 -> int16: something is not awake.;
$hypothesis$ = the pericardium is a sunglasses. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gibbon is not alterable it is not a sunglasses. sent2: if the gibbon is not cultural but it is a kind of a Beatitude then it is isopteran. sent3: something is a hydrant if it is not a wildlife and subvocalizes. sent4: if the fact that the gibbon is not subartesian but it is a Beatitude is incorrect then it is not a Aphrodite. sent5: the gibbon is a Aphrodite if it is not a backbencher and is awake. sent6: the fact that the pericardium is not a sunglasses but it is subartesian is incorrect. sent7: if the gibbon is not a sunglasses but it is a backbencher the pericardium is not subartesian. sent8: if the gibbon is not subartesian and is a Beatitude then the pericardium is not a sunglasses. sent9: the gibbon is not a Aphrodite if it is not a kind of a Beatitude. sent10: something is not unhelpful if it is a Yamamoto and it does not mask garbology. sent11: the hamate does not awake if there exists something such that the fact that it does awake and it is incredulous does not hold. sent12: the fact that something is awake and is incredulous is not right if it is not unhelpful. sent13: the pericardium does not mask Haley but it does jam fer-de-lance. sent14: a Carthusian thing is a Yamamoto and does not mask garbology. sent15: the pericardium is not a relic and is formic. sent16: the boilerplate does not tyrannize atrocity if that it is not a kind of a backbencher and it is haemophilic is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the pericardium is not a cowhide and does embrown stereotyped does not hold then it is not spectral. sent18: the fact that the gibbon is not a kind of a sunglasses is correct. sent19: that everything is a Carthusian is not false. sent20: the mannitol is a kind of non-awake thing that embrowns inchoative. sent21: the gibbon is both not a backbencher and awake. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gibbon is not subartesian but it is a kind of a Beatitude is not true.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the gibbon is not a Aphrodite.; sent5 & sent21 -> int2: the gibbon is a kind of a Aphrodite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gibbon is not subartesian but it is a Beatitude.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__