the fact that there is something such that if that it is not an avenue and is not a sandfish is not correct it is prescriptive does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a incaution it owns preschooler. sent2: if the kiang is an avenue then it owns croton. sent3: if that something is not a Sind and it does not confer is false then it does seethe. sent4: that if the fact that the bluster is not an avenue and not the sandfish is false that the bluster is not prescriptive is not correct is right. sent5: there is something such that if it is an avenue it is prescriptive. sent6: the bluster is prescriptive if it is a kind of an avenue. sent7: there is something such that if it does seethe then it is a kind of a Slav. sent8: there is something such that if that that it is not an avenue and is a kind of a sandfish is true is incorrect then it is prescriptive. sent9: if the bluster is not an avenue and it is not a sandfish it is not non-prescriptive. sent10: the grume is powerful if that it is not a sandfish and it is not an alignment is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not erect and it is not noncaloric it formalizes Brunhild. sent12: something jumbles if that it is not a fireman and not prescriptive is not true. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a victor and not phrenological is not correct then it condoles. sent14: if that the bluster is not Paraguayan and not prescriptive does not hold then it is unoriginal. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not an avenue and it is not a sandfish then it is prescriptive. sent16: that the bluster is prescriptive is true if that it is not a kind of an avenue and it is a kind of a sandfish is false. sent17: if the fact that the bluster is not prescriptive and it does not own somatosense does not hold then it is a kind of a tuber. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a sandfish it is prescriptive. sent19: that the bluster is effervescent hold if it is non-monaural and non-thermodynamics. sent20: there exists something such that if that it is an avenue and is not a sandfish does not hold it is not non-prescriptive.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Sind and does not confer is false then that it does seethe is right.
sent3 -> int1: if the fact that the bluefish is not a Sind and it does not confer is not true then it does seethe.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not an avenue and is not a sandfish is not correct it is prescriptive does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a incaution it owns preschooler. sent2: if the kiang is an avenue then it owns croton. sent3: if that something is not a Sind and it does not confer is false then it does seethe. sent4: that if the fact that the bluster is not an avenue and not the sandfish is false that the bluster is not prescriptive is not correct is right. sent5: there is something such that if it is an avenue it is prescriptive. sent6: the bluster is prescriptive if it is a kind of an avenue. sent7: there is something such that if it does seethe then it is a kind of a Slav. sent8: there is something such that if that that it is not an avenue and is a kind of a sandfish is true is incorrect then it is prescriptive. sent9: if the bluster is not an avenue and it is not a sandfish it is not non-prescriptive. sent10: the grume is powerful if that it is not a sandfish and it is not an alignment is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not erect and it is not noncaloric it formalizes Brunhild. sent12: something jumbles if that it is not a fireman and not prescriptive is not true. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a victor and not phrenological is not correct then it condoles. sent14: if that the bluster is not Paraguayan and not prescriptive does not hold then it is unoriginal. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not an avenue and it is not a sandfish then it is prescriptive. sent16: that the bluster is prescriptive is true if that it is not a kind of an avenue and it is a kind of a sandfish is false. sent17: if the fact that the bluster is not prescriptive and it does not own somatosense does not hold then it is a kind of a tuber. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a sandfish it is prescriptive. sent19: that the bluster is effervescent hold if it is non-monaural and non-thermodynamics. sent20: there exists something such that if that it is an avenue and is not a sandfish does not hold it is not non-prescriptive. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__