the wok is not unofficial.
sent1: if the fact that something is not meaningless but unofficial is wrong it is not unofficial. sent2: the hayrack is a kind of a Hungarian. sent3: the hayrack is not a colonic if the safranine is a Maoist. sent4: if something is not a hang but it does entrench placebo then that the ingot is meaningless is correct. sent5: something does not hang but it entrenches placebo. sent6: something is not a kind of a Maoist if the fact that it is not bauxitic and it is not colonic is not true. sent7: there is something such that it entrenches placebo. sent8: if that the safranine is not Maoist but bauxitic is not correct the hayrack is not a colonic. sent9: if something arises the fact that it is not bauxitic and not a colonic is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the safranine is not non-Maoist but bauxitic is not true. sent11: the fact that the safranine is not a Maoist but it is bauxitic does not hold if the ingot is meaningless. sent12: if the hayrack is not a colonic then the wok is not a colonic. sent13: the wok is not a kind of a colonic. sent14: if something does arise and is not a colonic it is unofficial. sent15: the safranine is a kind of a Maoist if a non-bauxitic thing is not a colonic. sent16: if something is a kind of a Weizmann then it is not a paramilitary and is radiolucent. sent17: something is not a hang. sent18: if the hayrack is a Hungarian it does wrest dismemberment and it is not a kind of a plumber. sent19: that if the ingot is a kind of a Maoist that the safranine is bauxitic and it is meaningless is not correct is true. sent20: there exists something such that it hangs and it does entrench placebo. sent21: that the safranine is Maoist and is bauxitic is not right if that the ingot is meaningless hold. sent22: if the hayrack wrests dismemberment the safranine is a kind of a Weizmann. sent23: the ingot does arise if there exists something such that it is not paramilitary and it is radiolucent. sent24: if the hayrack is not a colonic the wok arises but it is not colonic. sent25: if the wok arises and it is a colonic it is unofficial.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the ingot is meaningless.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the safranine is not a kind of a Maoist but it is bauxitic is not correct.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the hayrack is not a colonic.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the wok does arise and is not colonic.; sent14 -> int5: the wok is unofficial if it arises and it is not a colonic.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the wok is not unofficial.
sent1 -> int6: if that the wok is not meaningless but it is unofficial is not right then it is not unofficial.; sent6 -> int7: if that the ingot is both not bauxitic and not a colonic is not correct it is not Maoist.; sent9 -> int8: that the ingot is not bauxitic and it is not colonic is not right if it does arise.; sent16 -> int9: the safranine is not a paramilitary but it is radiolucent if it is a kind of a Weizmann.; sent18 & sent2 -> int10: the hayrack wrests dismemberment and is not a plumber.; int10 -> int11: the hayrack does wrest dismemberment.; sent22 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the safranine is a Weizmann is correct.; int9 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the safranine is non-paramilitary but it is radiolucent is not wrong.; int13 -> int14: something is both non-paramilitary and not non-radiolucent.; int14 & sent23 -> int15: the ingot does arise.; int8 & int15 -> int16: that the ingot is non-bauxitic thing that is not colonic is not true.; int7 & int16 -> int17: the ingot is not a Maoist.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is not a Maoist.;
$hypothesis$ = the wok is not unofficial. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not meaningless but unofficial is wrong it is not unofficial. sent2: the hayrack is a kind of a Hungarian. sent3: the hayrack is not a colonic if the safranine is a Maoist. sent4: if something is not a hang but it does entrench placebo then that the ingot is meaningless is correct. sent5: something does not hang but it entrenches placebo. sent6: something is not a kind of a Maoist if the fact that it is not bauxitic and it is not colonic is not true. sent7: there is something such that it entrenches placebo. sent8: if that the safranine is not Maoist but bauxitic is not correct the hayrack is not a colonic. sent9: if something arises the fact that it is not bauxitic and not a colonic is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the safranine is not non-Maoist but bauxitic is not true. sent11: the fact that the safranine is not a Maoist but it is bauxitic does not hold if the ingot is meaningless. sent12: if the hayrack is not a colonic then the wok is not a colonic. sent13: the wok is not a kind of a colonic. sent14: if something does arise and is not a colonic it is unofficial. sent15: the safranine is a kind of a Maoist if a non-bauxitic thing is not a colonic. sent16: if something is a kind of a Weizmann then it is not a paramilitary and is radiolucent. sent17: something is not a hang. sent18: if the hayrack is a Hungarian it does wrest dismemberment and it is not a kind of a plumber. sent19: that if the ingot is a kind of a Maoist that the safranine is bauxitic and it is meaningless is not correct is true. sent20: there exists something such that it hangs and it does entrench placebo. sent21: that the safranine is Maoist and is bauxitic is not right if that the ingot is meaningless hold. sent22: if the hayrack wrests dismemberment the safranine is a kind of a Weizmann. sent23: the ingot does arise if there exists something such that it is not paramilitary and it is radiolucent. sent24: if the hayrack is not a colonic the wok arises but it is not colonic. sent25: if the wok arises and it is a colonic it is unofficial. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the ingot is meaningless.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the safranine is not a kind of a Maoist but it is bauxitic is not correct.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the hayrack is not a colonic.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the wok does arise and is not colonic.; sent14 -> int5: the wok is unofficial if it arises and it is not a colonic.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__