there is something such that it is not a cushion and refreshes sublieutenant.
sent1: The inanimateness does not list sub-assembly. sent2: if the prong is judicial then it refreshes sublieutenant. sent3: the sub-assembly is not judicial. sent4: the prong is not a kind of a cushion. sent5: if the fact that something does not dump reevaluation but it refreshes sublieutenant is false then it is a Wister. sent6: there exists something such that it refreshes sublieutenant. sent7: if that something is not a kind of a cushion but it refreshes sublieutenant is wrong it is a muton. sent8: if that the prong is a muton is not incorrect the sub-assembly is non-judicial thing that does not list Naja. sent9: the fact that the sub-assembly greets Asimov is correct. sent10: the sub-assembly does not list inanimateness.
sent7 -> int1: the prong is a muton if that it is not a cushion and refreshes sublieutenant is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the prong is not a kind of a cushion but it does refresh sublieutenant does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the prong is a kind of a muton.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the sub-assembly is not judicial and it does not list Naja.;
the sub-assembly is a Wister if that it does not dump reevaluation and it refreshes sublieutenant is not right.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not a cushion and refreshes sublieutenant. ; $context$ = sent1: The inanimateness does not list sub-assembly. sent2: if the prong is judicial then it refreshes sublieutenant. sent3: the sub-assembly is not judicial. sent4: the prong is not a kind of a cushion. sent5: if the fact that something does not dump reevaluation but it refreshes sublieutenant is false then it is a Wister. sent6: there exists something such that it refreshes sublieutenant. sent7: if that something is not a kind of a cushion but it refreshes sublieutenant is wrong it is a muton. sent8: if that the prong is a muton is not incorrect the sub-assembly is non-judicial thing that does not list Naja. sent9: the fact that the sub-assembly greets Asimov is correct. sent10: the sub-assembly does not list inanimateness. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the prong is a muton if that it is not a cushion and refreshes sublieutenant is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the prong is not a kind of a cushion but it does refresh sublieutenant does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the prong is a kind of a muton.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the sub-assembly is not judicial and it does not list Naja.; __UNKNOWN__