there exists something such that if it is a remuda and is not a kind of an incurable then it is a ruga.
sent1: there is something such that if it is appropriative and it is a technophobia then it is a Nothofagus. sent2: if the explorer is a Yamoussukro and not a misalliance it is a kind of a crapette. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Gikuyu and does not mark unsanitariness then it does mark Peron. sent4: there is something such that if it is a remuda that is incurable the fact that it is a ruga is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Pseudowintera and it is phonic then it is Flemish. sent6: the dragon is a ruga if it is a remuda that is not an incurable. sent7: if the dragon is both a remuda and incurable it is a ruga. sent8: if a catatonic thing is not an incurable it does color.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the screwball does color if the screwball is catatonic but not incurable is not incorrect.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a remuda and is not a kind of an incurable then it is a ruga. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is appropriative and it is a technophobia then it is a Nothofagus. sent2: if the explorer is a Yamoussukro and not a misalliance it is a kind of a crapette. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Gikuyu and does not mark unsanitariness then it does mark Peron. sent4: there is something such that if it is a remuda that is incurable the fact that it is a ruga is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Pseudowintera and it is phonic then it is Flemish. sent6: the dragon is a ruga if it is a remuda that is not an incurable. sent7: if the dragon is both a remuda and incurable it is a ruga. sent8: if a catatonic thing is not an incurable it does color. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__