that there exists something such that that it is not estrogenic and/or does not tabulate splay is not right is incorrect.
sent1: that the lactose is a thurifer but it does not invest Pandora is not true. sent2: if the eardrum is a positivity then the Tokay is a piezoelectricity. sent3: that the fact that something is not a Morrigan or is not a kind of a jodhpur or both is false if it is not a kind of a positivity is true. sent4: if there is something such that it either is a kind of a thurifer or invests Pandora or both then the lactose is not a piezoelectricity. sent5: the lactose does invest Pandora if the fact that it is a thurifer and it does not invest Pandora does not hold. sent6: if the fact that something is a piezoelectricity that is a Babar is false it is not a piezoelectricity. sent7: there is something such that it is not seaward and/or it tabulates pouched. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of a piezoelectricity and it is a kind of a Babar is incorrect if it is not a Wittgenstein. sent9: the whittler is a Babar if the lactose is incoherent. sent10: the whittler is not a Babar if either something is a piezoelectricity or it is a Wittgenstein or both. sent11: something is incoherent if the fact that it invests Pandora is not wrong. sent12: the eardrum is a kind of a positivity if there is something such that it is not estrogenic and/or it does not tabulate splay. sent13: if the cheroot is a Babar then it is estrogenic. sent14: the lactose is a piezoelectricity if the Tokay is a thurifer. sent15: that something is estrogenic or does not tabulate splay or both is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cheroot is non-estrogenic and/or does not tabulate splay is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not estrogenic and/or it does not tabulate splay.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the eardrum is a kind of a positivity.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Tokay is a piezoelectricity.; int3 -> int4: the Tokay is a piezoelectricity or it is a Wittgenstein or both.; int4 -> int5: something is a piezoelectricity or is a kind of a Wittgenstein or both.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the whittler is not a kind of a Babar.; sent11 -> int7: if the lactose does invest Pandora it is incoherent.; sent5 & sent1 -> int8: the lactose does invest Pandora.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the lactose is incoherent.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the whittler is a kind of a Babar.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: that the cheroot is non-estrogenic or it does not tabulate splay or both is incorrect.; int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the eardrum is not a Morrigan and/or it is not a jodhpur is false.
sent3 -> int13: if the eardrum is not a positivity then that it either is not a kind of a Morrigan or is not a jodhpur or both is not correct.; sent6 -> int14: the Tokay is not a piezoelectricity if that it is a kind of a piezoelectricity and it is a kind of a Babar is not true.; sent8 -> int15: if the whittler is not a Wittgenstein the fact that it is a piezoelectricity and it is a Babar is false.;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that that it is not estrogenic and/or does not tabulate splay is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lactose is a thurifer but it does not invest Pandora is not true. sent2: if the eardrum is a positivity then the Tokay is a piezoelectricity. sent3: that the fact that something is not a Morrigan or is not a kind of a jodhpur or both is false if it is not a kind of a positivity is true. sent4: if there is something such that it either is a kind of a thurifer or invests Pandora or both then the lactose is not a piezoelectricity. sent5: the lactose does invest Pandora if the fact that it is a thurifer and it does not invest Pandora does not hold. sent6: if the fact that something is a piezoelectricity that is a Babar is false it is not a piezoelectricity. sent7: there is something such that it is not seaward and/or it tabulates pouched. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of a piezoelectricity and it is a kind of a Babar is incorrect if it is not a Wittgenstein. sent9: the whittler is a Babar if the lactose is incoherent. sent10: the whittler is not a Babar if either something is a piezoelectricity or it is a Wittgenstein or both. sent11: something is incoherent if the fact that it invests Pandora is not wrong. sent12: the eardrum is a kind of a positivity if there is something such that it is not estrogenic and/or it does not tabulate splay. sent13: if the cheroot is a Babar then it is estrogenic. sent14: the lactose is a piezoelectricity if the Tokay is a thurifer. sent15: that something is estrogenic or does not tabulate splay or both is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cheroot is non-estrogenic and/or does not tabulate splay is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not estrogenic and/or it does not tabulate splay.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the eardrum is a kind of a positivity.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Tokay is a piezoelectricity.; int3 -> int4: the Tokay is a piezoelectricity or it is a Wittgenstein or both.; int4 -> int5: something is a piezoelectricity or is a kind of a Wittgenstein or both.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the whittler is not a kind of a Babar.; sent11 -> int7: if the lactose does invest Pandora it is incoherent.; sent5 & sent1 -> int8: the lactose does invest Pandora.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the lactose is incoherent.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the whittler is a kind of a Babar.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: that the cheroot is non-estrogenic or it does not tabulate splay or both is incorrect.; int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__