the fact that either the alga does not fudge amelioration or it does not weed reactance or both is not correct.
sent1: the cedar does not spot dolman and does not weed reactance if the fact that something is not upstream is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the alga does not fudge amelioration or it does not weed reactance or both is not true if the cedar does not weed reactance. sent3: the fact that the cedar does spot dolman is not true. sent4: that the alga does not weed reactance or it does not spot dolman or both is false. sent5: if the cedar does not weed reactance the alga weed reactance. sent6: the alga weeds reactance. sent7: there exists something such that it is non-upstream. sent8: the cedar is not a gravel. sent9: if the cedar does not fudge amelioration the fact that the fact that the alga does not spot dolman and/or it does not fudge amelioration is wrong is right. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not upstream then the cedar does not spot dolman. sent11: the alga does not fudge amelioration if there is something such that it is upstream.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the cedar does not spot dolman and it does not weed reactance.; int1 -> int2: the cedar does not weed reactance.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the alga does not fudge amelioration and/or does not weed reactance.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the alga does not fudge amelioration or it does not weed reactance or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the cedar does not spot dolman and does not weed reactance if the fact that something is not upstream is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the alga does not fudge amelioration or it does not weed reactance or both is not true if the cedar does not weed reactance. sent3: the fact that the cedar does spot dolman is not true. sent4: that the alga does not weed reactance or it does not spot dolman or both is false. sent5: if the cedar does not weed reactance the alga weed reactance. sent6: the alga weeds reactance. sent7: there exists something such that it is non-upstream. sent8: the cedar is not a gravel. sent9: if the cedar does not fudge amelioration the fact that the fact that the alga does not spot dolman and/or it does not fudge amelioration is wrong is right. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not upstream then the cedar does not spot dolman. sent11: the alga does not fudge amelioration if there is something such that it is upstream. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the cedar does not spot dolman and it does not weed reactance.; int1 -> int2: the cedar does not weed reactance.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__