that the scratch does not occur and the megaloblasticness does not occur if the enterprise happens is not right.
sent1: if the orchestrating resorcinol and the scratch occurs then the enterprise does not occur. sent2: the parrying does not occur and the fogbank does not occur. sent3: that the hungering pyrophosphate occurs is triggered by that the orchestrating roulette and the orchestrating billyo occurs. sent4: that the burglarizing Stenotomus does not occur causes that the occasions happens and the enterprise occurs. sent5: if the basalness occurs but the piracy does not occur then the fact that the fermentableness happens is not false. sent6: the orchestrating resorcinol is triggered by that the orchestrating Tinbergen happens and the indistinguishableness does not occur. sent7: the extinctness does not occur. sent8: that the noninvasiveness happens and the disservice occurs brings about that the orchestrating credenza occurs. sent9: that the burglarizing Stenotomus occurs but the untidiness does not occur brings about the orchestrating physiologist. sent10: if the sentence happens and the burglarizing Stenotomus occurs the orchestrating Beveridge does not occur. sent11: the parrying happens if the zymoticness happens and the forgetfulness occurs. sent12: the burglarizing blini is triggered by that the declining and the hydrocephalicness occurs. sent13: the uncomfortableness but not the freemail occurs. sent14: the tallness occurs. sent15: the orchestrating Tinbergen and the non-indistinguishableness happens. sent16: that the hungering toasting does not occur is not wrong. sent17: the megaloblasticness does not occur. sent18: the perianalness happens. sent19: the tapotement does not occur if both the mouthing and the endodonticness occurs. sent20: if the Dostoevskianness occurs and the President does not occur the orchestrating Rochambeau occurs. sent21: the fact that the unpaintableness does not occur hold.
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the orchestrating resorcinol happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scratching happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the orchestrating resorcinol happens and the scratch occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the enterprise does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enterprise happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the scratching does not occur.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the scratching does not occur and the megaloblasticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
both the occasions and the untidiness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the scratch does not occur and the megaloblasticness does not occur if the enterprise happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the orchestrating resorcinol and the scratch occurs then the enterprise does not occur. sent2: the parrying does not occur and the fogbank does not occur. sent3: that the hungering pyrophosphate occurs is triggered by that the orchestrating roulette and the orchestrating billyo occurs. sent4: that the burglarizing Stenotomus does not occur causes that the occasions happens and the enterprise occurs. sent5: if the basalness occurs but the piracy does not occur then the fact that the fermentableness happens is not false. sent6: the orchestrating resorcinol is triggered by that the orchestrating Tinbergen happens and the indistinguishableness does not occur. sent7: the extinctness does not occur. sent8: that the noninvasiveness happens and the disservice occurs brings about that the orchestrating credenza occurs. sent9: that the burglarizing Stenotomus occurs but the untidiness does not occur brings about the orchestrating physiologist. sent10: if the sentence happens and the burglarizing Stenotomus occurs the orchestrating Beveridge does not occur. sent11: the parrying happens if the zymoticness happens and the forgetfulness occurs. sent12: the burglarizing blini is triggered by that the declining and the hydrocephalicness occurs. sent13: the uncomfortableness but not the freemail occurs. sent14: the tallness occurs. sent15: the orchestrating Tinbergen and the non-indistinguishableness happens. sent16: that the hungering toasting does not occur is not wrong. sent17: the megaloblasticness does not occur. sent18: the perianalness happens. sent19: the tapotement does not occur if both the mouthing and the endodonticness occurs. sent20: if the Dostoevskianness occurs and the President does not occur the orchestrating Rochambeau occurs. sent21: the fact that the unpaintableness does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the orchestrating resorcinol happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scratching happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the orchestrating resorcinol happens and the scratch occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the enterprise does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enterprise happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the scratching does not occur.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the scratching does not occur and the megaloblasticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__