the rerunning tack does not occur.
sent1: that the fruition occurs is correct. sent2: if that the rerunning Capricorn occurs and the conditioning occurs is wrong the fact that the snips does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the cramp does not occur. sent4: if both the rerunning tack and the shinny happens the trundling hosier does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the maleficentness happens but the rerunning half-breed does not occur is not right then the DO does not occur. sent6: that the maleficentness but not the rerunning half-breed occurs does not hold if the fruition occurs. sent7: that the follow-up and the trundling hosier occurs is triggered by the non-Rooseveltianness. sent8: if the fact that the coupling occurs and the forking happens is not correct the docking does not occur. sent9: that the autofluorescence and the flow happens is brought about by that the politicizing does not occur. sent10: if the DO does not occur then both the snips and the protesting rubbing happens. sent11: that the shinny happens is not incorrect. sent12: if the saccadicness does not occur then the fact that the rerunning Capricorn happens and the conditions happens is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rerunning tack happens.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: both the rerunning tack and the shinny happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the trundling hosier does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the trundling hosier does not occur or the Rooseveltianness happens or both.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: that the fact that the maleficentness but not the rerunning half-breed happens is false is not wrong.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the DO does not occur is correct.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: both the snips and the protesting rubbing happens.; int6 -> int7: the snips occurs.;
that the follow-up occurs and the politicizing occurs is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the rerunning tack does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fruition occurs is correct. sent2: if that the rerunning Capricorn occurs and the conditioning occurs is wrong the fact that the snips does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the cramp does not occur. sent4: if both the rerunning tack and the shinny happens the trundling hosier does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the maleficentness happens but the rerunning half-breed does not occur is not right then the DO does not occur. sent6: that the maleficentness but not the rerunning half-breed occurs does not hold if the fruition occurs. sent7: that the follow-up and the trundling hosier occurs is triggered by the non-Rooseveltianness. sent8: if the fact that the coupling occurs and the forking happens is not correct the docking does not occur. sent9: that the autofluorescence and the flow happens is brought about by that the politicizing does not occur. sent10: if the DO does not occur then both the snips and the protesting rubbing happens. sent11: that the shinny happens is not incorrect. sent12: if the saccadicness does not occur then the fact that the rerunning Capricorn happens and the conditions happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rerunning tack happens.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: both the rerunning tack and the shinny happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the trundling hosier does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the trundling hosier does not occur or the Rooseveltianness happens or both.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: that the fact that the maleficentness but not the rerunning half-breed happens is false is not wrong.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the DO does not occur is correct.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: both the snips and the protesting rubbing happens.; int6 -> int7: the snips occurs.; __UNKNOWN__