that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a eclat then it is a kind of unmilitary thing that is abiogenetic is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not definite is right then it is desirable and it does ensnare. sent2: the modernist is a eclat that does border grasshopper if it is not egoistic. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not follow then it is innocuous and it is reducible. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not emulous then it heels bollworm and it is phrenological. sent5: the kinsman is a kind of a lay that is a kind of a eclat if it does not detrain disambiguator. sent6: there is something such that if it does not stain it is prescription and it is a warlock. sent7: the chowder is a kind of a eclat that does forage sequence if it is not crustose. sent8: the kinsman does flump and forages fantasy if it is not a kind of a eclat. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a eclat then it is unmilitary. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not ensnare then it does forage Mysidae and it is a kind of a Manx. sent11: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a eclat is not false it is unmilitary thing that is not non-abiogenetic. sent12: if that the kinsman is a eclat hold it is unmilitary and not non-abiogenetic. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a eclat then it is abiogenetic. sent14: something is a kind of a sketcher and it is a kind of a eclat if it is not agonadal. sent15: if the kinsman is not a eclat it is not military and it is abiogenetic. sent16: the masterpiece is abiogenetic and it does peregrinate if it does not heel bollworm. sent17: if the kinsman is not a eclat it is abiogenetic. sent18: if the chlorination is not a kind of a prescription then it is not non-mores and it is a kind of a precursor. sent19: there is something such that if it is not bureaucratic it is a kind of a sediment and is definite. sent20: if the fact that the kinsman is not a eclat hold then it does detrain disambiguator and is diclinous.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
if the boomer is not agonadal then it is a kind of a sketcher and it is a eclat.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a eclat then it is a kind of unmilitary thing that is abiogenetic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not definite is right then it is desirable and it does ensnare. sent2: the modernist is a eclat that does border grasshopper if it is not egoistic. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not follow then it is innocuous and it is reducible. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not emulous then it heels bollworm and it is phrenological. sent5: the kinsman is a kind of a lay that is a kind of a eclat if it does not detrain disambiguator. sent6: there is something such that if it does not stain it is prescription and it is a warlock. sent7: the chowder is a kind of a eclat that does forage sequence if it is not crustose. sent8: the kinsman does flump and forages fantasy if it is not a kind of a eclat. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a eclat then it is unmilitary. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not ensnare then it does forage Mysidae and it is a kind of a Manx. sent11: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a eclat is not false it is unmilitary thing that is not non-abiogenetic. sent12: if that the kinsman is a eclat hold it is unmilitary and not non-abiogenetic. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a eclat then it is abiogenetic. sent14: something is a kind of a sketcher and it is a kind of a eclat if it is not agonadal. sent15: if the kinsman is not a eclat it is not military and it is abiogenetic. sent16: the masterpiece is abiogenetic and it does peregrinate if it does not heel bollworm. sent17: if the kinsman is not a eclat it is abiogenetic. sent18: if the chlorination is not a kind of a prescription then it is not non-mores and it is a kind of a precursor. sent19: there is something such that if it is not bureaucratic it is a kind of a sediment and is definite. sent20: if the fact that the kinsman is not a eclat hold then it does detrain disambiguator and is diclinous. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__