the redeposition is a sandiness.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not non-republican. sent2: the mistletoe does not flake marbleization if there is something such that it is a republican and it is a Caldwell. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Caldwell then that it does flake marbleization and is not republican is not correct. sent4: the change is a intractability if something is not a kind of a reply but it does overuse redeposition. sent5: the paddlewheel is not a reply and does overuse redeposition. sent6: if the mistletoe is a Volgaic then it is jihadi. sent7: the change is a Caldwell. sent8: something is a sandiness and a Caldwell. sent9: that something is a kind of a Caldwell is correct. sent10: something that is not a sandiness or is a intractability or both is not a kind of a sandiness. sent11: if the mistletoe does not flake marbleization then the fact that the redeposition is a kind of a sandiness is not incorrect. sent12: the fact that the manometer is both a litigant and a intractability is not wrong. sent13: there is something such that it is not a reply. sent14: the paddlewheel is not a kind of a reply. sent15: the change is a intractability if there is something such that it is a reply and does overuse redeposition. sent16: if the fact that something flakes marbleization but it is not a republican is false then it is a republican. sent17: the redeposition is not a Caldwell if the fact that the change is non-luteal a Caldwell does not hold. sent18: if something is a intractability then it is republican. sent19: something is not a sandiness or is a kind of a intractability or both if it is republican. sent20: that the galea is an efficiency hold.
sent5 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a reply and overuses redeposition.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the change is a kind of a intractability.; sent18 -> int3: if the change is a kind of a intractability then it is republican.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the change is republican.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the change is a republican and it is a kind of a Caldwell.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is both republican and a Caldwell.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the mistletoe does not flake marbleization.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the redeposition is not a sandiness.
sent10 -> int8: the redeposition is not a sandiness if it is not a kind of a sandiness and/or it is a intractability.; sent19 -> int9: if the redeposition is a republican then either it is not a sandiness or it is a intractability or both.; sent16 -> int10: the redeposition is a kind of a republican if that it flakes marbleization and it is not a republican is not true.; sent3 -> int11: that the redeposition flakes marbleization but it is not a republican is not correct if it is not a Caldwell.;
$hypothesis$ = the redeposition is a sandiness. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not non-republican. sent2: the mistletoe does not flake marbleization if there is something such that it is a republican and it is a Caldwell. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Caldwell then that it does flake marbleization and is not republican is not correct. sent4: the change is a intractability if something is not a kind of a reply but it does overuse redeposition. sent5: the paddlewheel is not a reply and does overuse redeposition. sent6: if the mistletoe is a Volgaic then it is jihadi. sent7: the change is a Caldwell. sent8: something is a sandiness and a Caldwell. sent9: that something is a kind of a Caldwell is correct. sent10: something that is not a sandiness or is a intractability or both is not a kind of a sandiness. sent11: if the mistletoe does not flake marbleization then the fact that the redeposition is a kind of a sandiness is not incorrect. sent12: the fact that the manometer is both a litigant and a intractability is not wrong. sent13: there is something such that it is not a reply. sent14: the paddlewheel is not a kind of a reply. sent15: the change is a intractability if there is something such that it is a reply and does overuse redeposition. sent16: if the fact that something flakes marbleization but it is not a republican is false then it is a republican. sent17: the redeposition is not a Caldwell if the fact that the change is non-luteal a Caldwell does not hold. sent18: if something is a intractability then it is republican. sent19: something is not a sandiness or is a kind of a intractability or both if it is republican. sent20: that the galea is an efficiency hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a reply and overuses redeposition.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the change is a kind of a intractability.; sent18 -> int3: if the change is a kind of a intractability then it is republican.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the change is republican.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the change is a republican and it is a kind of a Caldwell.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is both republican and a Caldwell.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the mistletoe does not flake marbleization.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__