there exists something such that if it is postnatal then the fact that it is not autosomal and/or does shampoo spline is not wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is earlier it is not a polynomial or it is reactive or both. sent2: the spline is not autosomal or it does shampoo spline or both if it is postnatal. sent3: something is not autosomal and/or expenses puku if it expenses daraf. sent4: there exists something such that if it is postnatal it is autosomal and/or shampoos spline. sent5: there is something such that if it is carnivorous then it is not numerological or is a histidine or both. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a pataca it does not reopen superlative and/or it is a ketosteroid. sent7: if the spline is postnatal it is autosomal and/or it shampoos spline.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the spline does expense daraf it is not autosomal and/or does expense puku.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is postnatal then the fact that it is not autosomal and/or does shampoo spline is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is earlier it is not a polynomial or it is reactive or both. sent2: the spline is not autosomal or it does shampoo spline or both if it is postnatal. sent3: something is not autosomal and/or expenses puku if it expenses daraf. sent4: there exists something such that if it is postnatal it is autosomal and/or shampoos spline. sent5: there is something such that if it is carnivorous then it is not numerological or is a histidine or both. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a pataca it does not reopen superlative and/or it is a ketosteroid. sent7: if the spline is postnatal it is autosomal and/or it shampoos spline. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__