the three-pieceness happens and/or the extinguishing Copehan does not occur.
sent1: that the incandescence occurs and the teachership happens is wrong. sent2: the fact that the three-pieceness occurs or the extinguishing Copehan does not occur or both is false if the stoning does not occur. sent3: the contributing Cork happens if the lacrosse does not occur. sent4: that the stoning happens is wrong if the macroeconomicsness does not occur. sent5: if the gazumping occurs then the fact that either the officialness happens or the literalness does not occur or both does not hold. sent6: if that the rhizoidalness but not the constipation happens is not true then the macroeconomicsness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the rhizoidalness but not the constipation happens is incorrect if the gazumping does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the extinguishing Copehan happens but the gazumping does not occur does not hold then the fact that the extinguishing Copehan does not occur is not false. sent9: the gazumping does not occur.
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the rhizoidalness happens but the constipation does not occur is wrong.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the macroeconomicsness does not occur.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the stoning does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the official happens and/or the literalness does not occur is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the three-pieceness happens and/or the extinguishing Copehan does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the incandescence occurs and the teachership happens is wrong. sent2: the fact that the three-pieceness occurs or the extinguishing Copehan does not occur or both is false if the stoning does not occur. sent3: the contributing Cork happens if the lacrosse does not occur. sent4: that the stoning happens is wrong if the macroeconomicsness does not occur. sent5: if the gazumping occurs then the fact that either the officialness happens or the literalness does not occur or both does not hold. sent6: if that the rhizoidalness but not the constipation happens is not true then the macroeconomicsness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the rhizoidalness but not the constipation happens is incorrect if the gazumping does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the extinguishing Copehan happens but the gazumping does not occur does not hold then the fact that the extinguishing Copehan does not occur is not false. sent9: the gazumping does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the rhizoidalness happens but the constipation does not occur is wrong.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the macroeconomicsness does not occur.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the stoning does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__