there exists something such that if that it is a collectivization is not false then it is not a colonic and is not an argyll.
sent1: if the fact that the level is a kind of a collectivization is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a colonic. sent2: there is something such that if it is an undergraduate it does not charm cockateel and it does not charm neoconservative. sent3: that something is both not an argyll and not sedimentary if it is a hemimorphite hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is ventricular it is not a Jarrell and is not probabilistic. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a collectivization it is not colonic. sent6: the replication is not unbreakable and it is not colonic if it does snag outfield. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a collectivization is right then it is not an argyll. sent8: the level is a kind of non-colonic thing that is an argyll if it is a kind of a collectivization. sent9: the acetum is not a kind of an argyll and it is non-heliocentric if that it is a recency hold. sent10: if the level is a collectivization then it is not colonic and it is not an argyll. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a collectivization the fact that it is not a colonic but an argyll hold is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a collectivization then it is colonic and it is not a kind of an argyll. sent13: the level is not a colonic and it is not thematic if it does charm level.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Tamil is not a kind of an argyll and it is not sedimentary if it is a hemimorphite.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a collectivization is not false then it is not a colonic and is not an argyll. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the level is a kind of a collectivization is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a colonic. sent2: there is something such that if it is an undergraduate it does not charm cockateel and it does not charm neoconservative. sent3: that something is both not an argyll and not sedimentary if it is a hemimorphite hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is ventricular it is not a Jarrell and is not probabilistic. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a collectivization it is not colonic. sent6: the replication is not unbreakable and it is not colonic if it does snag outfield. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a collectivization is right then it is not an argyll. sent8: the level is a kind of non-colonic thing that is an argyll if it is a kind of a collectivization. sent9: the acetum is not a kind of an argyll and it is non-heliocentric if that it is a recency hold. sent10: if the level is a collectivization then it is not colonic and it is not an argyll. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a collectivization the fact that it is not a colonic but an argyll hold is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a collectivization then it is colonic and it is not a kind of an argyll. sent13: the level is not a colonic and it is not thematic if it does charm level. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__