the supportiveness and the stupefaction occurs.
sent1: the intelligence happens and the premiere occurs if the stupefaction does not occur. sent2: the osteopathy happens if the cerebrovascularness happens. sent3: that the moonbeam but not the PET occurs results in the tending. sent4: if the osteopathy does not occur then the fact that both the non-cerebrovascularness and the assaying occurs is not correct. sent5: if the fact that the non-cerebrovascularness and the assaying happens is not right then the fact that the assaying does not occur is not false. sent6: the banning wandflower does not occur and the bubbling does not occur. sent7: that the tending does not occur is caused by that the osteopathy and the premiere occurs. sent8: that the osteopathy does not occur and the tending happens is triggered by that the preferment happens. sent9: the moonbeam occurs and the Sotho occurs. sent10: if the Algonquianness does not occur the fact that the supportiveness and the stupefaction happens is not correct. sent11: the antitypicness occurs. sent12: the cerebrovascularness occurs. sent13: if not the tending but the premiere occurs then the supportiveness happens. sent14: the PET does not occur if the banning wandflower does not occur and the bubbling does not occur. sent15: the preferment or that the premiere does not occur or both triggers the non-Algonquianness. sent16: the Algonquianness does not occur if the preferment occurs. sent17: that the PET does not occur is not false if not the banning wandflower but the bubble happens.
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the osteopathy happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the premiere happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the osteopathy happens and the premiere happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the tending does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: the moonbeam happens.; sent14 & sent6 -> int5: the PET does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the moonbeam but not the PET happens.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the tending happens.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the premiere does not occur.; int9 -> int10: either the preferment happens or the premiere does not occur or both.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the Algonquian does not occur.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the intelligence but not the assay occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the supportiveness and the stupefaction occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the intelligence happens and the premiere occurs if the stupefaction does not occur. sent2: the osteopathy happens if the cerebrovascularness happens. sent3: that the moonbeam but not the PET occurs results in the tending. sent4: if the osteopathy does not occur then the fact that both the non-cerebrovascularness and the assaying occurs is not correct. sent5: if the fact that the non-cerebrovascularness and the assaying happens is not right then the fact that the assaying does not occur is not false. sent6: the banning wandflower does not occur and the bubbling does not occur. sent7: that the tending does not occur is caused by that the osteopathy and the premiere occurs. sent8: that the osteopathy does not occur and the tending happens is triggered by that the preferment happens. sent9: the moonbeam occurs and the Sotho occurs. sent10: if the Algonquianness does not occur the fact that the supportiveness and the stupefaction happens is not correct. sent11: the antitypicness occurs. sent12: the cerebrovascularness occurs. sent13: if not the tending but the premiere occurs then the supportiveness happens. sent14: the PET does not occur if the banning wandflower does not occur and the bubbling does not occur. sent15: the preferment or that the premiere does not occur or both triggers the non-Algonquianness. sent16: the Algonquianness does not occur if the preferment occurs. sent17: that the PET does not occur is not false if not the banning wandflower but the bubble happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the osteopathy happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the premiere happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the osteopathy happens and the premiere happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the tending does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: the moonbeam happens.; sent14 & sent6 -> int5: the PET does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the moonbeam but not the PET happens.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the tending happens.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the premiere does not occur.; int9 -> int10: either the preferment happens or the premiere does not occur or both.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the Algonquian does not occur.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__