the fact that the seconder is congressional but it is not metabolic does not hold.
sent1: the Swede is unimportant. sent2: that the seconder sensualizes Turkoman is correct if the fact that it is congressional is correct. sent3: if the fact that the seconder is not metabolic and is congressional is not correct that it does sensualize Turkoman is not false. sent4: the Swede does not sensualize Turkoman and/or it is straight. sent5: if something is a kind of a straight then it sensualizes tavern. sent6: if something is a kind of a grating then it sensualizes vacationer. sent7: if the Swede is unimportant then that it is not a wireless and it is a upholder is false. sent8: if there exists something such that it peruses and does sensualize tavern that the seconder is a ghee hold. sent9: if the Swede either does not sensualize Turkoman or is a kind of a straight or both it is straight. sent10: that something is a kind of congressional thing that is not metabolic is not true if it is a kind of a ghee.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the Swede is not a wireless but a upholder does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the Swede is a straight is right it does sensualize tavern.; sent9 & sent4 -> int3: the Swede is a straight.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Swede does sensualize tavern.; sent10 -> int5: if the seconder is a ghee that it is congressional and it is not metabolic is false.;
if the Villa is a grating then it sensualizes vacationer.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the seconder is congressional but it is not metabolic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Swede is unimportant. sent2: that the seconder sensualizes Turkoman is correct if the fact that it is congressional is correct. sent3: if the fact that the seconder is not metabolic and is congressional is not correct that it does sensualize Turkoman is not false. sent4: the Swede does not sensualize Turkoman and/or it is straight. sent5: if something is a kind of a straight then it sensualizes tavern. sent6: if something is a kind of a grating then it sensualizes vacationer. sent7: if the Swede is unimportant then that it is not a wireless and it is a upholder is false. sent8: if there exists something such that it peruses and does sensualize tavern that the seconder is a ghee hold. sent9: if the Swede either does not sensualize Turkoman or is a kind of a straight or both it is straight. sent10: that something is a kind of congressional thing that is not metabolic is not true if it is a kind of a ghee. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the Swede is not a wireless but a upholder does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the Swede is a straight is right it does sensualize tavern.; sent9 & sent4 -> int3: the Swede is a straight.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Swede does sensualize tavern.; sent10 -> int5: if the seconder is a ghee that it is congressional and it is not metabolic is false.; __UNKNOWN__