the preempting Kennelly does not occur.
sent1: if the discourtesy does not occur the fact that the onshoreness happens and/or the strings does not occur is not right. sent2: that the preempting Argusianus occurs and the failing occurs is not incorrect. sent3: the jellifying Zealander occurs and the operative happens. sent4: the Cornish happens. sent5: if the failing happens then the onshoreness occurs and/or the stringing does not occur. sent6: the discourtesy is prevented by that both the jellifying Zealander and the rockslide occurs. sent7: the preempting Kennelly does not occur if the fact that the isopteranness occurs but the bacchanal does not occur does not hold. sent8: the whistle does not occur if the overreaching occurs. sent9: the thrill does not occur if the fact that the batting but not the snowballing happens is not true. sent10: if the fact that both the cardiovascularness and the non-operativeness occurs does not hold the cardiovascularness does not occur. sent11: the Lamarckianness happens and the esotericness occurs. sent12: if the rockslide does not occur the fact that the isopteranness but not the bacchanal happens is not correct.
sent3 -> int1: the jellifying Zealander occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rockslide happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the jellifying Zealander and the rockslide happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the discourtesy does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the onshoreness occurs and/or the stringing does not occur is false.; sent2 -> int5: the failing happens.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the onshoreness happens and/or the stringing does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the rockslide does not occur.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the fact that the isopteranness happens and the bacchanal does not occur does not hold.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the cardiovascularness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the preempting Kennelly does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the discourtesy does not occur the fact that the onshoreness happens and/or the strings does not occur is not right. sent2: that the preempting Argusianus occurs and the failing occurs is not incorrect. sent3: the jellifying Zealander occurs and the operative happens. sent4: the Cornish happens. sent5: if the failing happens then the onshoreness occurs and/or the stringing does not occur. sent6: the discourtesy is prevented by that both the jellifying Zealander and the rockslide occurs. sent7: the preempting Kennelly does not occur if the fact that the isopteranness occurs but the bacchanal does not occur does not hold. sent8: the whistle does not occur if the overreaching occurs. sent9: the thrill does not occur if the fact that the batting but not the snowballing happens is not true. sent10: if the fact that both the cardiovascularness and the non-operativeness occurs does not hold the cardiovascularness does not occur. sent11: the Lamarckianness happens and the esotericness occurs. sent12: if the rockslide does not occur the fact that the isopteranness but not the bacchanal happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the jellifying Zealander occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rockslide happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the jellifying Zealander and the rockslide happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the discourtesy does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the onshoreness occurs and/or the stringing does not occur is false.; sent2 -> int5: the failing happens.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the onshoreness happens and/or the stringing does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the rockslide does not occur.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the fact that the isopteranness happens and the bacchanal does not occur does not hold.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__