the fact that the cubist does narrate Halictidae is not false.
sent1: if something is not illegitimate then the fact that it is active and it is not endogenic is correct. sent2: if something is organizational it is not exculpatory. sent3: if something that narrates Khedive is not a kind of a knickknack then it does not narrate Halictidae. sent4: if the Khedive narrates Agropyron then it is a Telescopium. sent5: if the palingenesis is not a countermarch and/or it is not Chadian the cubist is not a knickknack. sent6: if the palingenesis is not non-trophoblastic but it does not accept then it is organizational. sent7: if the fact that something floats and deprives zaire is not true it is not illegitimate. sent8: the fact that the cubist narrates Halictidae is right. sent9: The fact that the Halictidae narrates cubist is right. sent10: the Khedive does narrate Agropyron. sent11: the drawknife narrates Halictidae. sent12: the commandant does narrate Halictidae if that the fact that the cubist is a knickknack and does not narrate Halictidae is not wrong is not correct. sent13: if something is not exculpatory it either is not a countermarch or is not a Chadian or both. sent14: the attack does narrate Halictidae. sent15: the cubist is a melon. sent16: the babbitt does narrate Halictidae. sent17: if something that is an active is non-endogenic that it narrates Khedive is not wrong. sent18: if something is endogenic then the fact that it is not a kind of an active and does not narrate Khedive is not true. sent19: if the Khedive is not a sectarianism but it is a Telescopium that the calcium does not deprive zaire is not incorrect. sent20: the Khedive is not a kind of a sectarianism. sent21: the cubist subjects astraphobia. sent22: the fact that the cubist does float and does deprive zaire does not hold if there is something such that it does not deprive zaire.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the commandant narrates Halictidae.
sent18 -> int1: the fact that the calcium is not a kind of an active and does not narrate Khedive is not correct if it is endogenic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cubist does narrate Halictidae is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not illegitimate then the fact that it is active and it is not endogenic is correct. sent2: if something is organizational it is not exculpatory. sent3: if something that narrates Khedive is not a kind of a knickknack then it does not narrate Halictidae. sent4: if the Khedive narrates Agropyron then it is a Telescopium. sent5: if the palingenesis is not a countermarch and/or it is not Chadian the cubist is not a knickknack. sent6: if the palingenesis is not non-trophoblastic but it does not accept then it is organizational. sent7: if the fact that something floats and deprives zaire is not true it is not illegitimate. sent8: the fact that the cubist narrates Halictidae is right. sent9: The fact that the Halictidae narrates cubist is right. sent10: the Khedive does narrate Agropyron. sent11: the drawknife narrates Halictidae. sent12: the commandant does narrate Halictidae if that the fact that the cubist is a knickknack and does not narrate Halictidae is not wrong is not correct. sent13: if something is not exculpatory it either is not a countermarch or is not a Chadian or both. sent14: the attack does narrate Halictidae. sent15: the cubist is a melon. sent16: the babbitt does narrate Halictidae. sent17: if something that is an active is non-endogenic that it narrates Khedive is not wrong. sent18: if something is endogenic then the fact that it is not a kind of an active and does not narrate Khedive is not true. sent19: if the Khedive is not a sectarianism but it is a Telescopium that the calcium does not deprive zaire is not incorrect. sent20: the Khedive is not a kind of a sectarianism. sent21: the cubist subjects astraphobia. sent22: the fact that the cubist does float and does deprive zaire does not hold if there is something such that it does not deprive zaire. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__