the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur.
sent1: the intracellularness does not occur and the tweet does not occur. sent2: that the amphotericness happens brings about that the zymoidness but not the license occurs. sent3: if the non-amphotericness and/or the non-changeableness occurs then the tempering associationism does not occur. sent4: the adenocarcinomatousness occurs if the tempering associationism does not occur and the whizzing does not occur. sent5: the subluxating happens. sent6: that the zymoidness occurs but the license does not occur is not right if the subluxating occurs. sent7: if the intracellularness does not occur the whizzing does not occur but the rockiness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amphotericness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the zymoidness happens and the license does not occur.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: that the zymoidness occurs and the licensing does not occur is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the amphotericness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the non-amphotericness or the non-changeableness or both happens.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the tempering associationism does not occur.; sent1 -> int7: that the intracellularness does not occur hold.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the whizzing does not occur but the rockiness happens.; int8 -> int9: the whizzing does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the tempering associationism does not occur and the whizzing does not occur.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the intracellularness does not occur and the tweet does not occur. sent2: that the amphotericness happens brings about that the zymoidness but not the license occurs. sent3: if the non-amphotericness and/or the non-changeableness occurs then the tempering associationism does not occur. sent4: the adenocarcinomatousness occurs if the tempering associationism does not occur and the whizzing does not occur. sent5: the subluxating happens. sent6: that the zymoidness occurs but the license does not occur is not right if the subluxating occurs. sent7: if the intracellularness does not occur the whizzing does not occur but the rockiness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amphotericness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the zymoidness happens and the license does not occur.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: that the zymoidness occurs and the licensing does not occur is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the amphotericness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the non-amphotericness or the non-changeableness or both happens.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the tempering associationism does not occur.; sent1 -> int7: that the intracellularness does not occur hold.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the whizzing does not occur but the rockiness happens.; int8 -> int9: the whizzing does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the tempering associationism does not occur and the whizzing does not occur.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__