the fact that the suicide is carbocyclic but it is not a kind of a tritheist is not correct.
sent1: that the bullpen is not a kind of a adventurousness and is not alkalotic is not correct if it does not ensconce cosmetician. sent2: the suicide is carbocyclic. sent3: if the smack is not alkalotic that it does not fish hairbrush and/or does not ensconce cosmetician is wrong. sent4: the smack is not alkalotic if it is a kind of a labor. sent5: if something that ensconces cosmetician does not fish hairbrush then it is not alkalotic. sent6: the smack does fish hairbrush and is not carbocyclic if the suicide fish hairbrush. sent7: if the fact that that the smack is a secretaryship and is not a Haggard is right is false it does labor. sent8: if that the smack does not fish hairbrush or it does not ensconce cosmetician or both is incorrect then it is carbocyclic. sent9: the bullpen is not a adventurousness. sent10: if the smack is carbocyclic then the suicide is carbocyclic and not a tritheist. sent11: something does labor and is a adventurousness if it is not alkalotic. sent12: the fact that something is carbocyclic thing that is not a kind of a tritheist is false if it labors. sent13: the bullpen is a adventurousness if the smack is a secretaryship and is not a kind of a Haggard.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smack is a kind of a secretaryship and is not a kind of a Haggard.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the bullpen is a adventurousness.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the smack is a kind of a secretaryship but it is not a Haggard is not right.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the smack labors.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the smack is not alkalotic.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the smack does not fish hairbrush or it does not ensconce cosmetician or both does not hold.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the smack is carbocyclic.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the suicide is carbocyclic and is not a kind of a tritheist is incorrect.
sent12 -> int8: if the suicide does labor the fact that it is both carbocyclic and not a tritheist is not correct.; sent11 -> int9: if the fact that the suicide is not alkalotic is correct then it is both a labor and a adventurousness.; sent5 -> int10: if the suicide does ensconce cosmetician and does not fish hairbrush it is non-alkalotic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the suicide is carbocyclic but it is not a kind of a tritheist is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bullpen is not a kind of a adventurousness and is not alkalotic is not correct if it does not ensconce cosmetician. sent2: the suicide is carbocyclic. sent3: if the smack is not alkalotic that it does not fish hairbrush and/or does not ensconce cosmetician is wrong. sent4: the smack is not alkalotic if it is a kind of a labor. sent5: if something that ensconces cosmetician does not fish hairbrush then it is not alkalotic. sent6: the smack does fish hairbrush and is not carbocyclic if the suicide fish hairbrush. sent7: if the fact that that the smack is a secretaryship and is not a Haggard is right is false it does labor. sent8: if that the smack does not fish hairbrush or it does not ensconce cosmetician or both is incorrect then it is carbocyclic. sent9: the bullpen is not a adventurousness. sent10: if the smack is carbocyclic then the suicide is carbocyclic and not a tritheist. sent11: something does labor and is a adventurousness if it is not alkalotic. sent12: the fact that something is carbocyclic thing that is not a kind of a tritheist is false if it labors. sent13: the bullpen is a adventurousness if the smack is a secretaryship and is not a kind of a Haggard. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smack is a kind of a secretaryship and is not a kind of a Haggard.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the bullpen is a adventurousness.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the smack is a kind of a secretaryship but it is not a Haggard is not right.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the smack labors.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the smack is not alkalotic.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the smack does not fish hairbrush or it does not ensconce cosmetician or both does not hold.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the smack is carbocyclic.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__