the fact that there is something such that if it does hear inelegance it is sensational and it is not diabatic is not correct.
sent1: the esplanade is not a harmfulness. sent2: if there exists something such that it does not hear inelegance that the abrogator does miscarry esplanade and approaches is false. sent3: if the dumper is not a kind of a nonagon the Rambouillet is not sensational. sent4: if the paramecium does hear inelegance then it is sensational. sent5: the dumper is not a nonagon or it is not warmed or both if there is something such that it is uncommon. sent6: if something is not a kind of a harmfulness the fact that the ganglion is hemorrhagic and it is a harmfulness does not hold. sent7: the creation warms. sent8: that the naproxen is not a harmfulness is not incorrect if that the ganglion is a kind of hemorrhagic thing that is a harmfulness is not correct. sent9: the paramecium is non-diabatic if the fact that the Rambouillet is a nonagon and it does warm is false. sent10: the Rambouillet is not sensational if the dumper is not warmed. sent11: if that the naproxen is not a kind of a harmfulness is true that it is uncommon and is not occipital is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it does hear inelegance it is sensational thing that is diabatic. sent13: the paramecium is warmed. sent14: the fact that the Rambouillet is a nonagon that is warmed is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paramecium does hear inelegance.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the paramecium is sensational.; sent9 & sent14 -> int2: the paramecium is not diabatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the paramecium is both sensational and non-diabatic.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the paramecium is sensational and is not diabatic is not wrong if it does hear inelegance.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the abrogator does miscarry esplanade and it is a kind of an approach is not right.
sent1 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a harmfulness.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: that the ganglion is hemorrhagic and it is a harmfulness is false.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the naproxen is not a harmfulness.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: the naproxen is uncommon but it is not occipital.; int8 -> int9: the naproxen is uncommon.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is uncommon.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the dumper is not a nonagon and/or is not warmed.; int11 & sent3 & sent10 -> int12: the Rambouillet is not sensational.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does hear inelegance it is sensational and it is not diabatic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the esplanade is not a harmfulness. sent2: if there exists something such that it does not hear inelegance that the abrogator does miscarry esplanade and approaches is false. sent3: if the dumper is not a kind of a nonagon the Rambouillet is not sensational. sent4: if the paramecium does hear inelegance then it is sensational. sent5: the dumper is not a nonagon or it is not warmed or both if there is something such that it is uncommon. sent6: if something is not a kind of a harmfulness the fact that the ganglion is hemorrhagic and it is a harmfulness does not hold. sent7: the creation warms. sent8: that the naproxen is not a harmfulness is not incorrect if that the ganglion is a kind of hemorrhagic thing that is a harmfulness is not correct. sent9: the paramecium is non-diabatic if the fact that the Rambouillet is a nonagon and it does warm is false. sent10: the Rambouillet is not sensational if the dumper is not warmed. sent11: if that the naproxen is not a kind of a harmfulness is true that it is uncommon and is not occipital is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it does hear inelegance it is sensational thing that is diabatic. sent13: the paramecium is warmed. sent14: the fact that the Rambouillet is a nonagon that is warmed is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paramecium does hear inelegance.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the paramecium is sensational.; sent9 & sent14 -> int2: the paramecium is not diabatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the paramecium is both sensational and non-diabatic.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the paramecium is sensational and is not diabatic is not wrong if it does hear inelegance.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__