that both the snowballing swimmer and the reissuing penicillamine happens is brought about by the non-avuncularness.
sent1: the snowballing blindworm happens. sent2: that the acceleration does not occur triggers that the undoing and the Maltese happens. sent3: if the coping occurs the transformation and the nonviolence occurs. sent4: the commutableness happens. sent5: the messaging does not occur. sent6: that the messaging does not occur prevents that the snowballing Tyne does not occur. sent7: both the consternating Waugh and the homingness occurs. sent8: that the reissuing penicillamine happens is brought about by that the open-sourceness happens but the avuncularness does not occur. sent9: the open-sourceness happens. sent10: that the rig occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the snowballing Tyne and the snowballing swimmer occurs if the messaging does not occur. sent12: the polo happens. sent13: the country-dance occurs if both the consternating compatriot and the malodorousness occurs. sent14: the gastronomicness occurs and the cockfighting happens if the consternating Shivaist does not occur. sent15: the oligarchicness happens and the compressibleness happens. sent16: the reissuing penicillamine is brought about by that the open-sourceness happens and the avuncularness happens. sent17: the party and the overthrowing happens if the overturning does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the avuncularness does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the open-sourceness happens and the avuncularness does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the reissuing penicillamine happens.; sent11 & sent5 -> int3: both the snowballing Tyne and the snowballing swimmer occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the snowballing swimmer occurs hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the snowballing swimmer and the reissuing penicillamine happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the snowballing swimmer and the reissuing penicillamine happens is brought about by the non-avuncularness. ; $context$ = sent1: the snowballing blindworm happens. sent2: that the acceleration does not occur triggers that the undoing and the Maltese happens. sent3: if the coping occurs the transformation and the nonviolence occurs. sent4: the commutableness happens. sent5: the messaging does not occur. sent6: that the messaging does not occur prevents that the snowballing Tyne does not occur. sent7: both the consternating Waugh and the homingness occurs. sent8: that the reissuing penicillamine happens is brought about by that the open-sourceness happens but the avuncularness does not occur. sent9: the open-sourceness happens. sent10: that the rig occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the snowballing Tyne and the snowballing swimmer occurs if the messaging does not occur. sent12: the polo happens. sent13: the country-dance occurs if both the consternating compatriot and the malodorousness occurs. sent14: the gastronomicness occurs and the cockfighting happens if the consternating Shivaist does not occur. sent15: the oligarchicness happens and the compressibleness happens. sent16: the reissuing penicillamine is brought about by that the open-sourceness happens and the avuncularness happens. sent17: the party and the overthrowing happens if the overturning does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the avuncularness does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the open-sourceness happens and the avuncularness does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the reissuing penicillamine happens.; sent11 & sent5 -> int3: both the snowballing Tyne and the snowballing swimmer occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the snowballing swimmer occurs hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the snowballing swimmer and the reissuing penicillamine happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__