the harness is tongueless.
sent1: that the topmast does not instrument malabsorption is right if it is tongueless a nanomia. sent2: the harness is not tongueless if there exists something such that either it integrates alkene or it instruments malabsorption or both. sent3: that the bassarisk does integrate alkene is right if the malabsorption integrates criminology. sent4: the malabsorption is a kind of a Zsigmondy and it does integrate criminology. sent5: the topmast is tongueless if it is a portmanteau. sent6: the topmast is a nanomia. sent7: the topmast is a portmanteau. sent8: if the malabsorption does not integrate criminology then the topmast is a landing and it is a Zsigmondy.
sent4 -> int1: the malabsorption does integrate criminology.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the bassarisk does integrate alkene is not false.; int2 -> int3: the bassarisk does integrate alkene and/or does instrument malabsorption.; int3 -> int4: something does integrate alkene or it does instrument malabsorption or both.; int4 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the topmast is both archidiaconal and a landing.
sent5 & sent7 -> int5: the topmast is not non-tongueless.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the topmast is tongueless and it is a nanomia.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the topmast does not instrument malabsorption is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the harness is tongueless. ; $context$ = sent1: that the topmast does not instrument malabsorption is right if it is tongueless a nanomia. sent2: the harness is not tongueless if there exists something such that either it integrates alkene or it instruments malabsorption or both. sent3: that the bassarisk does integrate alkene is right if the malabsorption integrates criminology. sent4: the malabsorption is a kind of a Zsigmondy and it does integrate criminology. sent5: the topmast is tongueless if it is a portmanteau. sent6: the topmast is a nanomia. sent7: the topmast is a portmanteau. sent8: if the malabsorption does not integrate criminology then the topmast is a landing and it is a Zsigmondy. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the malabsorption does integrate criminology.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the bassarisk does integrate alkene is not false.; int2 -> int3: the bassarisk does integrate alkene and/or does instrument malabsorption.; int3 -> int4: something does integrate alkene or it does instrument malabsorption or both.; int4 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__