the stable is a rhumba.
sent1: that the haptoglobin does not become spirited and it is not thallophytic is not right if it is an ethic. sent2: the fact that the deflector is acrogenic is not wrong if there is something such that that it does not become spirited and is not thallophytic is incorrect. sent3: if something is acrogenic and/or it is not a Tudor then the stable is a rhumba. sent4: the haptoglobin is an ethic.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the haptoglobin does not become spirited and is not thallophytic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that that it does not become spirited and is not thallophytic is true is incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the deflector is acrogenic.; int3 -> int4: the deflector is acrogenic and/or is not a kind of a Tudor.; int4 -> int5: something is acrogenic or not a Tudor or both.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the stable is a rhumba. ; $context$ = sent1: that the haptoglobin does not become spirited and it is not thallophytic is not right if it is an ethic. sent2: the fact that the deflector is acrogenic is not wrong if there is something such that that it does not become spirited and is not thallophytic is incorrect. sent3: if something is acrogenic and/or it is not a Tudor then the stable is a rhumba. sent4: the haptoglobin is an ethic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the haptoglobin does not become spirited and is not thallophytic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that that it does not become spirited and is not thallophytic is true is incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the deflector is acrogenic.; int3 -> int4: the deflector is acrogenic and/or is not a kind of a Tudor.; int4 -> int5: something is acrogenic or not a Tudor or both.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__