both the blackening and the reheating occurs if the mistaking does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the hapticness occurs is not wrong the drinking homogeneity occurs and the drinking grume does not occur. sent2: the reheating does not occur if the drinking homogeneity but not the drinking grume occurs. sent3: that the emoting does not occur or the non-fingerlessness or both prevents that the emoting occurs. sent4: if the fingerlessness happens the immoralness does not occur and the mistaking does not occur. sent5: that the fingerlessness does not occur is correct if the transfusion occurs. sent6: if the fact that the mistake occurs is not false the fact that the Iberian occurs but the transfusion does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the fact that the Iberianness occurs and the transfusion occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the mistake does not occur. sent8: the reheating occurs. sent9: the physicalness happens. sent10: the fact that both the Iberian and the transfusion occurs is false. sent11: that both the blackening and the reheating happens is triggered by that the mistake occurs. sent12: that the fact that the Iberianness but not the transfusion happens is not right if the fact that the mistaking does not occur is correct is correct. sent13: the blackening happens if the fingerlessness does not occur. sent14: the fingerlessness does not occur if that the Iberian but not the transfusion occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mistaking does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that that the Iberianness happens but the transfusion does not occur is not incorrect is not correct.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fingerlessness does not occur.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the blackening happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: both the blackening and the reheating occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the emoting does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = both the blackening and the reheating occurs if the mistaking does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the hapticness occurs is not wrong the drinking homogeneity occurs and the drinking grume does not occur. sent2: the reheating does not occur if the drinking homogeneity but not the drinking grume occurs. sent3: that the emoting does not occur or the non-fingerlessness or both prevents that the emoting occurs. sent4: if the fingerlessness happens the immoralness does not occur and the mistaking does not occur. sent5: that the fingerlessness does not occur is correct if the transfusion occurs. sent6: if the fact that the mistake occurs is not false the fact that the Iberian occurs but the transfusion does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the fact that the Iberianness occurs and the transfusion occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the mistake does not occur. sent8: the reheating occurs. sent9: the physicalness happens. sent10: the fact that both the Iberian and the transfusion occurs is false. sent11: that both the blackening and the reheating happens is triggered by that the mistake occurs. sent12: that the fact that the Iberianness but not the transfusion happens is not right if the fact that the mistaking does not occur is correct is correct. sent13: the blackening happens if the fingerlessness does not occur. sent14: the fingerlessness does not occur if that the Iberian but not the transfusion occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mistaking does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that that the Iberianness happens but the transfusion does not occur is not incorrect is not correct.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fingerlessness does not occur.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the blackening happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: both the blackening and the reheating occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__