the fact that the Dodgem does not overpower pin-up and does slave is not true.
sent1: if the alkapton does barb proposal then the faucet is a score. sent2: the clasp is not aeromedical and not inboard. sent3: if the faucet is not aponeurotic then the fool is aeromedical and is able. sent4: that the clasp does not overpower pin-up and does not slave is not true if that something is not aeromedical is right. sent5: something that is a kind of a slave is not inboard. sent6: if the alkapton is bulbaceous then the faucet is a kind of a score. sent7: that the mastoidale either does not overpower Verrazano or inures or both is wrong if it does barb RAS. sent8: there is something such that it barbs proposal. sent9: the Congregationalist does overpower pin-up. sent10: the mastoidale does barb RAS. sent11: something that is a score is a ramification. sent12: that the Dodgem is not aeromedical if the fool is aeromedical and not unable hold. sent13: if the fact that the mastoidale does not overpower Verrazano or inures or both is incorrect the committeeman is not a kind of an overtime. sent14: the faucet is a kind of zygomatic thing that is a bicentennial if the committeeman is not a kind of an overtime. sent15: the alkapton barbs proposal and/or it is bulbaceous if there is something such that it does barbs proposal. sent16: the Dodgem does not overpower pin-up and does slave if the clasp is not a slave. sent17: if the clasp is a slave it is aeromedical. sent18: if something that is zygomatic is a kind of a ramification then it is not aponeurotic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clasp is a slave.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the clasp is aeromedical.; sent2 -> int2: that the clasp is not aeromedical is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the clasp is not a slave hold.; int4 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the suture is not inboard.
sent5 -> int5: the suture is not inboard if the fact that it is a slave hold.; sent18 -> int6: the faucet is not aponeurotic if it is zygomatic and it is a ramification.; sent7 & sent10 -> int7: that the mastoidale does not overpower Verrazano or it does inure or both does not hold.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: that the committeeman is not a kind of an overtime hold.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the faucet is zygomatic and it is bicentennial.; int9 -> int10: the faucet is zygomatic.; sent11 -> int11: the faucet is a ramification if it does score.; sent8 & sent15 -> int12: the alkapton barbs proposal and/or it is bulbaceous.; int12 & sent1 & sent6 -> int13: the faucet is a score.; int11 & int13 -> int14: that the faucet is a ramification hold.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the faucet is zygomatic and it is a kind of a ramification.; int6 & int15 -> int16: the faucet is not aponeurotic.; sent3 & int16 -> int17: the fool is a kind of aeromedical thing that is able.; sent12 & int17 -> int18: that the Dodgem is not aeromedical is not incorrect.; int18 -> int19: there are non-aeromedical things.; int19 & sent4 -> int20: that that the clasp does not overpower pin-up and is not a slave does not hold hold.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that that it does not overpower pin-up and is not a slave does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Dodgem does not overpower pin-up and does slave is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the alkapton does barb proposal then the faucet is a score. sent2: the clasp is not aeromedical and not inboard. sent3: if the faucet is not aponeurotic then the fool is aeromedical and is able. sent4: that the clasp does not overpower pin-up and does not slave is not true if that something is not aeromedical is right. sent5: something that is a kind of a slave is not inboard. sent6: if the alkapton is bulbaceous then the faucet is a kind of a score. sent7: that the mastoidale either does not overpower Verrazano or inures or both is wrong if it does barb RAS. sent8: there is something such that it barbs proposal. sent9: the Congregationalist does overpower pin-up. sent10: the mastoidale does barb RAS. sent11: something that is a score is a ramification. sent12: that the Dodgem is not aeromedical if the fool is aeromedical and not unable hold. sent13: if the fact that the mastoidale does not overpower Verrazano or inures or both is incorrect the committeeman is not a kind of an overtime. sent14: the faucet is a kind of zygomatic thing that is a bicentennial if the committeeman is not a kind of an overtime. sent15: the alkapton barbs proposal and/or it is bulbaceous if there is something such that it does barbs proposal. sent16: the Dodgem does not overpower pin-up and does slave if the clasp is not a slave. sent17: if the clasp is a slave it is aeromedical. sent18: if something that is zygomatic is a kind of a ramification then it is not aponeurotic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clasp is a slave.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the clasp is aeromedical.; sent2 -> int2: that the clasp is not aeromedical is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the clasp is not a slave hold.; int4 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__