the dinging hammock occurs.
sent1: the referencing does not occur. sent2: the fact that the acidimetry occurs and the dinging hammock occurs is not incorrect if the cordlessness does not occur. sent3: that the sleeping porterhouse occurs and the imparting nuthatch occurs is brought about by that the twining does not occur. sent4: the dinging hammock does not occur if the fact that the sleeping porterhouse and the cordlessness happens is not right. sent5: the anxiolytic happens but the induction does not occur if the relations does not occur. sent6: that the cordlessness happens is prevented by that the overture happens. sent7: that not the imparting Bonn but the smasher occurs if the sleeping porterhouse does not occur is correct. sent8: if the reference does not occur the sleeping coup occurs and/or the locking does not occur. sent9: the imparting Bonn and the cordlessness occurs. sent10: if the sleeping porterhouse occurs the dinging hammock occurs. sent11: that the sleeping coup occurs prevents that the pyrography happens. sent12: that the anxiolytic but not the induction occurs results in that the overture happens. sent13: that the cyberneticness occurs but the twining does not occur is brought about by that the pyrography does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the sleeping porterhouse does not occur is correct.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the imparting Bonn does not occur but the smasher happens.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the imparting Bonn does not occur is true.; sent9 -> int3: the imparting Bonn occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sleeping porterhouse occurs.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the dinging hammock does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the dinging hammock occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the referencing does not occur. sent2: the fact that the acidimetry occurs and the dinging hammock occurs is not incorrect if the cordlessness does not occur. sent3: that the sleeping porterhouse occurs and the imparting nuthatch occurs is brought about by that the twining does not occur. sent4: the dinging hammock does not occur if the fact that the sleeping porterhouse and the cordlessness happens is not right. sent5: the anxiolytic happens but the induction does not occur if the relations does not occur. sent6: that the cordlessness happens is prevented by that the overture happens. sent7: that not the imparting Bonn but the smasher occurs if the sleeping porterhouse does not occur is correct. sent8: if the reference does not occur the sleeping coup occurs and/or the locking does not occur. sent9: the imparting Bonn and the cordlessness occurs. sent10: if the sleeping porterhouse occurs the dinging hammock occurs. sent11: that the sleeping coup occurs prevents that the pyrography happens. sent12: that the anxiolytic but not the induction occurs results in that the overture happens. sent13: that the cyberneticness occurs but the twining does not occur is brought about by that the pyrography does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the sleeping porterhouse does not occur is correct.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the imparting Bonn does not occur but the smasher happens.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the imparting Bonn does not occur is true.; sent9 -> int3: the imparting Bonn occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sleeping porterhouse occurs.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__