the fact that that that that the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur hold is incorrect if the unshavenness happens is true is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur is false if the subtilizing tradecraft does not occur. sent2: the unshavenness does not occur if that the subtilizing tradecraft occurs and the remise happens is not incorrect. sent3: that the appropriating banging but not the subtilizing plainness happens does not hold if the unshavenness occurs. sent4: the bottomlessness happens. sent5: the remise occurs. sent6: the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur. sent7: the unshavenness brings about that the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur. sent8: that the appropriating banging occurs and the subtilizing plainness does not occur does not hold. sent9: that the unifilarness does not occur and the drifting does not occur is brought about by that the Lithuanian does not occur. sent10: the fact that not the appropriating banging but the subtilizing plainness happens is not correct. sent11: if that the headshake does not occur hold that that the Transportation does not occur and the evidentiariness does not occur is not right is right. sent12: the fact that the scourge does not occur and the spitball does not occur is incorrect. sent13: that the appropriating banging occurs and the subtilizing plainness does not occur does not hold if the subtilizing tradecraft does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unshavenness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subtilizing tradecraft occurs.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: both the subtilizing tradecraft and the remise occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the unshavenness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the subtilizing tradecraft does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur is wrong.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that that that the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur hold is incorrect if the unshavenness happens is true is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur is false if the subtilizing tradecraft does not occur. sent2: the unshavenness does not occur if that the subtilizing tradecraft occurs and the remise happens is not incorrect. sent3: that the appropriating banging but not the subtilizing plainness happens does not hold if the unshavenness occurs. sent4: the bottomlessness happens. sent5: the remise occurs. sent6: the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur. sent7: the unshavenness brings about that the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur. sent8: that the appropriating banging occurs and the subtilizing plainness does not occur does not hold. sent9: that the unifilarness does not occur and the drifting does not occur is brought about by that the Lithuanian does not occur. sent10: the fact that not the appropriating banging but the subtilizing plainness happens is not correct. sent11: if that the headshake does not occur hold that that the Transportation does not occur and the evidentiariness does not occur is not right is right. sent12: the fact that the scourge does not occur and the spitball does not occur is incorrect. sent13: that the appropriating banging occurs and the subtilizing plainness does not occur does not hold if the subtilizing tradecraft does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unshavenness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subtilizing tradecraft occurs.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: both the subtilizing tradecraft and the remise occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the unshavenness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the subtilizing tradecraft does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the appropriating banging does not occur and the subtilizing plainness does not occur is wrong.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__