the mirid is hotbed.
sent1: the fact that the blastocoel does dissociate radicle and it is a Ursidae is wrong. sent2: the blastocoel does not dissociate dell. sent3: the fact that the mirid is hotbed but it does not dissociate radicle does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does dissociate radicle and is hotbed is wrong. sent5: if there is something such that it does not move blastocoel then the dell does not dissociate radicle. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does dissociate radicle and it is a Ursidae is incorrect. sent7: the mirid is not hotbed if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Ursidae. sent8: the blastocoel is not hotbed if there exists something such that it is not a Ursidae. sent9: that that the mirid is a kind of a Ursidae that is not hotbed hold is wrong. sent10: if there exists something such that that it does dissociate radicle and is not a Ursidae does not hold the mirid is not hotbed. sent11: if something does not move calomel then it is hotbed and a Passifloraceae. sent12: that the blastocoel does dissociate radicle but it is not a kind of a Ursidae is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that that it does dissociate radicle and is not a Ursidae is correct.
sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that that it dissociates radicle and it is not a Ursidae is incorrect.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the mirid is hotbed.
sent11 -> int2: that the mirid is hotbed and it is a Passifloraceae hold if it does not move calomel.;
$hypothesis$ = the mirid is hotbed. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the blastocoel does dissociate radicle and it is a Ursidae is wrong. sent2: the blastocoel does not dissociate dell. sent3: the fact that the mirid is hotbed but it does not dissociate radicle does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does dissociate radicle and is hotbed is wrong. sent5: if there is something such that it does not move blastocoel then the dell does not dissociate radicle. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does dissociate radicle and it is a Ursidae is incorrect. sent7: the mirid is not hotbed if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Ursidae. sent8: the blastocoel is not hotbed if there exists something such that it is not a Ursidae. sent9: that that the mirid is a kind of a Ursidae that is not hotbed hold is wrong. sent10: if there exists something such that that it does dissociate radicle and is not a Ursidae does not hold the mirid is not hotbed. sent11: if something does not move calomel then it is hotbed and a Passifloraceae. sent12: that the blastocoel does dissociate radicle but it is not a kind of a Ursidae is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that that it does dissociate radicle and is not a Ursidae is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that that it dissociates radicle and it is not a Ursidae is incorrect.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__