that there is something such that if it is abiogenetic it is not prewar and not basophilic does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it redecorates highway is not incorrect it falls glossarist and does not fall sangapenum. sent2: there is something such that if it is abiogenetic then it is not basophilic. sent3: the ranter is not prewar but it is basophilic if the fact that it is abiogenetic is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Palestinian then it does not tincture lash and it does interrelate ranter. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Seth it is a kind of a Martian and it is not a kind of a spokeshave. sent6: if the ranter is not non-prewar it does not squall. sent7: there is something such that if it is abiogenetic it is both not prewar and basophilic. sent8: if the ranter is not non-prewar then it is non-recessive thing that is not czarist. sent9: there exists something such that if it is postwar then it is a kind of ossiferous thing that is not a kind of a rivet. sent10: the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a dismissal it does not fall memorability and it is not catechetical hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is abiogenetic then it is non-prewar. sent12: there exists something such that if it redecorates Acer it does not fall sangapenum. sent13: there is something such that if it does interrelate earful then it is a seizure and it does not fall dame. sent14: if the velodrome is czarist it does not fall cinder and it is not prewar. sent15: something is not abiogenetic and not a sanitariness if it does fall cinder. sent16: the fact that the ranter does not tincture lied is not incorrect if it is basophilic. sent17: if the ranter does iridesce then that it does not fall benefactor and is not a Dias is true. sent18: the ranter is non-prewar and is not basophilic if it is abiogenetic.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
the dame is both not abiogenetic and not a sanitariness if it falls cinder.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is abiogenetic it is not prewar and not basophilic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it redecorates highway is not incorrect it falls glossarist and does not fall sangapenum. sent2: there is something such that if it is abiogenetic then it is not basophilic. sent3: the ranter is not prewar but it is basophilic if the fact that it is abiogenetic is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Palestinian then it does not tincture lash and it does interrelate ranter. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Seth it is a kind of a Martian and it is not a kind of a spokeshave. sent6: if the ranter is not non-prewar it does not squall. sent7: there is something such that if it is abiogenetic it is both not prewar and basophilic. sent8: if the ranter is not non-prewar then it is non-recessive thing that is not czarist. sent9: there exists something such that if it is postwar then it is a kind of ossiferous thing that is not a kind of a rivet. sent10: the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a dismissal it does not fall memorability and it is not catechetical hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is abiogenetic then it is non-prewar. sent12: there exists something such that if it redecorates Acer it does not fall sangapenum. sent13: there is something such that if it does interrelate earful then it is a seizure and it does not fall dame. sent14: if the velodrome is czarist it does not fall cinder and it is not prewar. sent15: something is not abiogenetic and not a sanitariness if it does fall cinder. sent16: the fact that the ranter does not tincture lied is not incorrect if it is basophilic. sent17: if the ranter does iridesce then that it does not fall benefactor and is not a Dias is true. sent18: the ranter is non-prewar and is not basophilic if it is abiogenetic. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__