the coupling does not price coupling.
sent1: the fact that something is a prospect that is not a sternutator is not true if it is parasitic. sent2: that the massif is not a Hoyle is not wrong if it is not a fret. sent3: if the massif is not a Hoyle then it is parasitic and it does price tobacco. sent4: the massif is not a kind of a fret. sent5: the crossbill is a stressed. sent6: the sister-in-law does price coupling and is not parasitic if that the buckle does not price tobacco is not wrong. sent7: the crossbill does price tobacco. sent8: if the coupling is a prospect it is parasitic. sent9: if there is something such that it prices coupling and it is a kind of a sternutator the fact that the coupling does not price tobacco hold. sent10: the buckle does price tobacco and prices Gaza. sent11: the crossbill does not price tobacco if there exists something such that it is parasitic and it does price coupling. sent12: the buckle prices Gaza. sent13: the crossbill prices Gaza. sent14: if the buckle is a sternutator then the coupling is a prospect. sent15: The tobacco does price crossbill. sent16: the sister-in-law does not prospect if it prices coupling and it is not parasitic. sent17: the fact that the buckle is parasitic is not incorrect. sent18: the buckle is a sternutator and does price Gaza. sent19: the crossbill prospects. sent20: the coupling does price Gaza. sent21: the buckle prices Gaza and it prices tobacco. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that it is a prospect and it is not a sternutator is not true then the crossbill is a sternutator. sent23: the coupling is a sternutator. sent24: something does not price tobacco if it is a kind of a Hoyle. sent25: the tobacco is not a sternutator. sent26: the coupling prices tobacco if the crossbill prices coupling.
sent18 -> int1: the buckle is a sternutator.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: that the coupling is a prospect is not wrong.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the coupling is parasitic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coupling prices coupling.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the coupling is parasitic thing that does price coupling.; int4 -> int5: something is parasitic thing that prices coupling.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the crossbill does not price tobacco.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the coupling does price coupling.
sent1 -> int8: if the massif is parasitic that it is a kind of a prospect that is not a kind of a sternutator does not hold.; sent2 & sent4 -> int9: the massif is not a Hoyle.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the massif is parasitic and it does price tobacco.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the massif is parasitic is not wrong.; int8 & int11 -> int12: that the massif is a prospect that is not a kind of a sternutator is false.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is a prospect and it is not a kind of a sternutator is incorrect.; int13 & sent22 -> int14: the crossbill is a kind of a sternutator.; int14 -> int15: something is a sternutator.;
$hypothesis$ = the coupling does not price coupling. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a prospect that is not a sternutator is not true if it is parasitic. sent2: that the massif is not a Hoyle is not wrong if it is not a fret. sent3: if the massif is not a Hoyle then it is parasitic and it does price tobacco. sent4: the massif is not a kind of a fret. sent5: the crossbill is a stressed. sent6: the sister-in-law does price coupling and is not parasitic if that the buckle does not price tobacco is not wrong. sent7: the crossbill does price tobacco. sent8: if the coupling is a prospect it is parasitic. sent9: if there is something such that it prices coupling and it is a kind of a sternutator the fact that the coupling does not price tobacco hold. sent10: the buckle does price tobacco and prices Gaza. sent11: the crossbill does not price tobacco if there exists something such that it is parasitic and it does price coupling. sent12: the buckle prices Gaza. sent13: the crossbill prices Gaza. sent14: if the buckle is a sternutator then the coupling is a prospect. sent15: The tobacco does price crossbill. sent16: the sister-in-law does not prospect if it prices coupling and it is not parasitic. sent17: the fact that the buckle is parasitic is not incorrect. sent18: the buckle is a sternutator and does price Gaza. sent19: the crossbill prospects. sent20: the coupling does price Gaza. sent21: the buckle prices Gaza and it prices tobacco. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that it is a prospect and it is not a sternutator is not true then the crossbill is a sternutator. sent23: the coupling is a sternutator. sent24: something does not price tobacco if it is a kind of a Hoyle. sent25: the tobacco is not a sternutator. sent26: the coupling prices tobacco if the crossbill prices coupling. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the buckle is a sternutator.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: that the coupling is a prospect is not wrong.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the coupling is parasitic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coupling prices coupling.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the coupling is parasitic thing that does price coupling.; int4 -> int5: something is parasitic thing that prices coupling.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the crossbill does not price tobacco.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__