the roaster is a Engraulidae and ideological.
sent1: that the roaster is both a reallotment and not ideological does not hold. sent2: the roaster is a Engraulidae that does rice dilution. sent3: the dilution does snag checkbook. sent4: the thickhead is a reallotment and does charm lumen. sent5: the roaster is ideological if the dilution is a reallotment. sent6: something is polytheistic. sent7: the fact that the Chadian is a reallotment is incorrect. sent8: if that something either is cambial or rices dilution or both does not hold it is not a bitters. sent9: the fact that something is cambial and/or it does rice dilution is not true if it is not a kind of a budget. sent10: that the dilution is a reallotment but it is not a kind of a bitters is not true. sent11: that the roaster is not a kind of a Engraulidae and it does not rice dilution is not correct if there is something such that it is a reallotment. sent12: if something is not polytheistic then the fact that it is a Engraulidae and it is ideological is not right. sent13: there is something such that it is a bitters. sent14: if that the roaster is not a Engraulidae and is not a bitters does not hold the dilution is ideological. sent15: if that the dilution is not a kind of a reallotment and is not a bitters is not true then the roaster is ideological. sent16: if there exists something such that it is ideological then the fact that the dilution is a kind of a Engraulidae but it is not a reallotment is not true. sent17: the roaster is a bitters. sent18: if something is a kind of a bitters then the fact that the roaster is a kind of a reallotment that does not rice dilution is not right. sent19: the dilution is a kind of a mortarboard and it is a onychophoran. sent20: if something is both not a reallotment and polytheistic then the fact that it is a kind of a bitters is not wrong. sent21: something that is not a bitters is both not a reallotment and non-polytheistic. sent22: the fact that that the dilution is not a reallotment and it does not bitter is wrong if there is something such that it is polytheistic hold. sent23: if something is a reallotment then that the dilution is a kind of ideological thing that does not rice dilution is false. sent24: the fact that the dilution is a kind of a reallotment and is not a bitters is wrong if something is polytheistic.
sent6 & sent22 -> int1: that the dilution is not a reallotment and it does not bitter does not hold.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the roaster is ideological.; sent2 -> int3: the roaster is a kind of a Engraulidae.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the roaster is a Engraulidae and it is ideological is not correct.
sent12 -> int4: that the roaster is a Engraulidae and it is ideological is not right if it is not polytheistic.; sent21 -> int5: if the roaster does not bitter it is not a reallotment and it is not polytheistic.; sent8 -> int6: that the roaster is not a bitters hold if that either it is cambial or it does rice dilution or both does not hold.; sent9 -> int7: that the roaster is cambial and/or it does rice dilution does not hold if it is not a budget.;
$hypothesis$ = the roaster is a Engraulidae and ideological. ; $context$ = sent1: that the roaster is both a reallotment and not ideological does not hold. sent2: the roaster is a Engraulidae that does rice dilution. sent3: the dilution does snag checkbook. sent4: the thickhead is a reallotment and does charm lumen. sent5: the roaster is ideological if the dilution is a reallotment. sent6: something is polytheistic. sent7: the fact that the Chadian is a reallotment is incorrect. sent8: if that something either is cambial or rices dilution or both does not hold it is not a bitters. sent9: the fact that something is cambial and/or it does rice dilution is not true if it is not a kind of a budget. sent10: that the dilution is a reallotment but it is not a kind of a bitters is not true. sent11: that the roaster is not a kind of a Engraulidae and it does not rice dilution is not correct if there is something such that it is a reallotment. sent12: if something is not polytheistic then the fact that it is a Engraulidae and it is ideological is not right. sent13: there is something such that it is a bitters. sent14: if that the roaster is not a Engraulidae and is not a bitters does not hold the dilution is ideological. sent15: if that the dilution is not a kind of a reallotment and is not a bitters is not true then the roaster is ideological. sent16: if there exists something such that it is ideological then the fact that the dilution is a kind of a Engraulidae but it is not a reallotment is not true. sent17: the roaster is a bitters. sent18: if something is a kind of a bitters then the fact that the roaster is a kind of a reallotment that does not rice dilution is not right. sent19: the dilution is a kind of a mortarboard and it is a onychophoran. sent20: if something is both not a reallotment and polytheistic then the fact that it is a kind of a bitters is not wrong. sent21: something that is not a bitters is both not a reallotment and non-polytheistic. sent22: the fact that that the dilution is not a reallotment and it does not bitter is wrong if there is something such that it is polytheistic hold. sent23: if something is a reallotment then that the dilution is a kind of ideological thing that does not rice dilution is false. sent24: the fact that the dilution is a kind of a reallotment and is not a bitters is wrong if something is polytheistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent22 -> int1: that the dilution is not a reallotment and it does not bitter does not hold.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the roaster is ideological.; sent2 -> int3: the roaster is a kind of a Engraulidae.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__