that if the water-mint is copular then the ascender is a wide-body is incorrect.
sent1: something is a Appalachian that churns boxing. sent2: there is something such that that it is not a gentile and does not crick is incorrect. sent3: the water-mint is a kind of a Appalachian if the fact that the neck does churn boxing is not incorrect. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does not churn boxing and it is not a Appalachian is incorrect the water-mint is copular. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a Appalachian but not a wide-body is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a gentile but a crick is false. sent7: there is something such that that it is a kind of a wide-body that is not Appalachian is not correct. sent8: the neck does churn boxing if there is something such that the fact that it is not a gentile and not a crick does not hold. sent9: if something is a Appalachian and it is copular then the ascender is a kind of a wide-body. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not churn boxing and is copular is not correct.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the neck churns boxing.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the water-mint is Appalachian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the water-mint is copular.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the water-mint is a kind of a Appalachian and it is copular.; int3 -> int4: something is a Appalachian and is not non-copular.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the ascender is a wide-body.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the water-mint is copular then the ascender is a wide-body is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Appalachian that churns boxing. sent2: there is something such that that it is not a gentile and does not crick is incorrect. sent3: the water-mint is a kind of a Appalachian if the fact that the neck does churn boxing is not incorrect. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does not churn boxing and it is not a Appalachian is incorrect the water-mint is copular. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a Appalachian but not a wide-body is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a gentile but a crick is false. sent7: there is something such that that it is a kind of a wide-body that is not Appalachian is not correct. sent8: the neck does churn boxing if there is something such that the fact that it is not a gentile and not a crick does not hold. sent9: if something is a Appalachian and it is copular then the ascender is a kind of a wide-body. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not churn boxing and is copular is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the neck churns boxing.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the water-mint is Appalachian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the water-mint is copular.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the water-mint is a kind of a Appalachian and it is copular.; int3 -> int4: something is a Appalachian and is not non-copular.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the ascender is a wide-body.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__