the hallelujah occurs.
sent1: if the salting betel does not occur the standdown occurs. sent2: the contribution occurs. sent3: the hallelujah happens if the arbitrableness occurs. sent4: the hallelujah does not occur if the confrontation happens or the surfing does not occur or both. sent5: if the confrontation does not occur the arbitrableness occurs. sent6: if the divergence does not occur then that the salting semaphore occurs is not incorrect. sent7: both the surfing and the contribution occurs. sent8: the foolishness does not occur. sent9: the minorsness does not occur if that the catering happens and/or the uplifting does not occur is false. sent10: the pteridologicalness happens if the reversion does not occur. sent11: the non-comprehensibleness triggers that the confrontation does not occur. sent12: that the exudation happens yields that the confrontation occurs. sent13: if the juggling happens the loosening occurs. sent14: if the compartmentalizing NP does not occur then the fact that not the contribution but the arbitrableness occurs is not right. sent15: if the escalation does not occur the paperwork occurs. sent16: that the salting Mosaic occurs or the eviction does not occur or both is not right. sent17: if that the exudation and/or the non-comprehensibleness happens does not hold the surfing does not occur. sent18: if the glycogenicness does not occur not the compartmentalizing NP but the shielding happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the exudation occurs or the comprehensibleness does not occur or both does not hold.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the surfing does not occur.; sent7 -> int2: the surfing occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the exudation occurs and/or the comprehensibleness does not occur.;
the hallelujah does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the hallelujah occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the salting betel does not occur the standdown occurs. sent2: the contribution occurs. sent3: the hallelujah happens if the arbitrableness occurs. sent4: the hallelujah does not occur if the confrontation happens or the surfing does not occur or both. sent5: if the confrontation does not occur the arbitrableness occurs. sent6: if the divergence does not occur then that the salting semaphore occurs is not incorrect. sent7: both the surfing and the contribution occurs. sent8: the foolishness does not occur. sent9: the minorsness does not occur if that the catering happens and/or the uplifting does not occur is false. sent10: the pteridologicalness happens if the reversion does not occur. sent11: the non-comprehensibleness triggers that the confrontation does not occur. sent12: that the exudation happens yields that the confrontation occurs. sent13: if the juggling happens the loosening occurs. sent14: if the compartmentalizing NP does not occur then the fact that not the contribution but the arbitrableness occurs is not right. sent15: if the escalation does not occur the paperwork occurs. sent16: that the salting Mosaic occurs or the eviction does not occur or both is not right. sent17: if that the exudation and/or the non-comprehensibleness happens does not hold the surfing does not occur. sent18: if the glycogenicness does not occur not the compartmentalizing NP but the shielding happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the exudation occurs or the comprehensibleness does not occur or both does not hold.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the surfing does not occur.; sent7 -> int2: the surfing occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the exudation occurs and/or the comprehensibleness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__