the piezoelectricity does not gather.
sent1: if the fact that the relations does not revenge Vinson is not wrong the firestone is a liver. sent2: the synovia does not repent if the firestone is a kind of a liver. sent3: the orator is both a linnet and a fenoprofen. sent4: the oil is a Casmerodius and it is a pineapple. sent5: if the halophyte is not blue-collar then it is not a goitrogen but a concrete. sent6: the fact that something does repent but it does not scant is not correct if it is not a tetanus. sent7: that the occiput does emblazon FAA or it is not blue-collar or both does not hold. sent8: if that the occiput emblazons FAA and/or is not blue-collar is not right the halophyte is not blue-collar. sent9: something does gather if that it is a tetanus is not incorrect. sent10: that the piezoelectricity is a kind of a tetanus does not hold if the fact that the firestone is not a Casmerodius and not unsensational is not right. sent11: if something is sensational it is a tetanus. sent12: the orator is a fenoprofen. sent13: if that the synovia is sensational is not right then the fact that the firestone is not a Casmerodius but sensational is wrong. sent14: that the piezoelectricity is sensational hold if the orator is a kind of a Casmerodius. sent15: if the firestone is a Casmerodius then the piezoelectricity is not a kind of a tetanus. sent16: the synovia is not sensational if the orator is a kind of a linnet and it is a fenoprofen. sent17: that something does not repent and it does not scant does not hold if it is not a tetanus. sent18: the relations does not revenge Vinson if something that is not a goitrogen does concrete.
sent16 & sent3 -> int1: the synovia is not sensational.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the firestone is not a Casmerodius and is sensational is wrong.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the piezoelectricity is not a kind of a tetanus.; sent17 -> int4: if the piezoelectricity is not a kind of a tetanus the fact that it does not repent and it does not scant is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the piezoelectricity does not repent and does not scant is not true.;
the piezoelectricity gathers.
sent9 -> int6: the piezoelectricity is a gather if the fact that it is a tetanus is not wrong.; sent11 -> int7: the piezoelectricity is a tetanus if it is sensational.; sent8 & sent7 -> int8: the halophyte is not blue-collar.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the halophyte is not a goitrogen but it is concrete.; int9 -> int10: something is not a kind of a goitrogen but it concretes.; int10 & sent18 -> int11: the relations does not revenge Vinson.; sent1 & int11 -> int12: the firestone is a kind of a liver.; sent2 & int12 -> int13: the synovia does not repent.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it does not repent.;
$hypothesis$ = the piezoelectricity does not gather. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the relations does not revenge Vinson is not wrong the firestone is a liver. sent2: the synovia does not repent if the firestone is a kind of a liver. sent3: the orator is both a linnet and a fenoprofen. sent4: the oil is a Casmerodius and it is a pineapple. sent5: if the halophyte is not blue-collar then it is not a goitrogen but a concrete. sent6: the fact that something does repent but it does not scant is not correct if it is not a tetanus. sent7: that the occiput does emblazon FAA or it is not blue-collar or both does not hold. sent8: if that the occiput emblazons FAA and/or is not blue-collar is not right the halophyte is not blue-collar. sent9: something does gather if that it is a tetanus is not incorrect. sent10: that the piezoelectricity is a kind of a tetanus does not hold if the fact that the firestone is not a Casmerodius and not unsensational is not right. sent11: if something is sensational it is a tetanus. sent12: the orator is a fenoprofen. sent13: if that the synovia is sensational is not right then the fact that the firestone is not a Casmerodius but sensational is wrong. sent14: that the piezoelectricity is sensational hold if the orator is a kind of a Casmerodius. sent15: if the firestone is a Casmerodius then the piezoelectricity is not a kind of a tetanus. sent16: the synovia is not sensational if the orator is a kind of a linnet and it is a fenoprofen. sent17: that something does not repent and it does not scant does not hold if it is not a tetanus. sent18: the relations does not revenge Vinson if something that is not a goitrogen does concrete. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent3 -> int1: the synovia is not sensational.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the firestone is not a Casmerodius and is sensational is wrong.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the piezoelectricity is not a kind of a tetanus.; sent17 -> int4: if the piezoelectricity is not a kind of a tetanus the fact that it does not repent and it does not scant is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the piezoelectricity does not repent and does not scant is not true.; __UNKNOWN__