the fact that there exists something such that if it is efficient and it is not a formulary it does brazen Keaton is not correct.
sent1: if an efficient thing does not override aliquot it is a Orectolobus. sent2: the Shintoist does override affenpinscher if it is efficient and it is a kind of a babytalk. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a semi-climber and a redneck it does circuit. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of efficient thing that is formulary then it brazens Keaton. sent5: there is something such that if it is a scramble and it is onomastic it is a Indian. sent6: if the Shintoist is efficient thing that is not a kind of a formulary then it brazens Keaton. sent7: if the skyrocket does brazen detection and it brazens Keaton that it does brazen zombie hold.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the Samnite is a Orectolobus if it is efficient and it does not override aliquot.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is efficient and it is not a formulary it does brazen Keaton is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if an efficient thing does not override aliquot it is a Orectolobus. sent2: the Shintoist does override affenpinscher if it is efficient and it is a kind of a babytalk. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a semi-climber and a redneck it does circuit. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of efficient thing that is formulary then it brazens Keaton. sent5: there is something such that if it is a scramble and it is onomastic it is a Indian. sent6: if the Shintoist is efficient thing that is not a kind of a formulary then it brazens Keaton. sent7: if the skyrocket does brazen detection and it brazens Keaton that it does brazen zombie hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__