the fact that the ex-mayor is a monorchism or is past or both does not hold.
sent1: the ex-mayor is a monorchism if there is something such that it catholicizes and it is uninstructive. sent2: that the sprawler edges musician hold if the ex-mayor does edges musician. sent3: something does not erase Cathaya if the fact that it is not culinary and is not a kind of a still is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not edge sprawler is not wrong. sent5: if that something does not blackmail railway and does blackmail em does not hold it does not blackmail em. sent6: if the ex-mayor is uninstructive the sprawler does edge musician. sent7: the dammar is either tubal or past or both. sent8: if that the trudger is loamless is not wrong the laureate does single. sent9: the butterfat is not nonfat and/or it is not loamless if something does not erase Cathaya. sent10: if the paintbox does not edge musician that the dammar is indistinguishable and does not stalemate is false. sent11: if there exists something such that it does catholicize the ex-mayor either is uninstructive or does edge musician or both. sent12: if the horseman is nominal then that the speedway is both not culinary and not a still is not correct. sent13: if the fact that something does not erase prostitution and it is not hidrotic is incorrect then it is not cerebrovascular. sent14: the paintbox does not edge musician. sent15: that that something does not erase prostitution and is not hidrotic is incorrect if it does not blackmail em is not false. sent16: something is a kind of a past and it is a monorchism if it is not cerebrovascular. sent17: if something is not non-past but a monorchism the paintbox does catholicize. sent18: the dammar is uninstructive. sent19: the fact that something does not blackmail railway and blackmails em is not correct if that it is single is not false. sent20: the fact that either something is a kind of a monorchism or it is past or both is incorrect if it is not uninstructive. sent21: The musician does not edge paintbox. sent22: if the fact that something is indistinguishable and not a stalemate does not hold then it does catholicize. sent23: if there exists something such that it does not edge sprawler the horseman is a kind of a allegretto and is a kind of a nominal. sent24: the ex-mayor is uninstructive if something that is a monorchism is indistinguishable. sent25: the trudger is loamless if the butterfat is fatty or is not loamless or both.
sent22 -> int1: if that the dammar is a kind of indistinguishable thing that is not a kind of a stalemate is incorrect then it does catholicize.; sent10 & sent14 -> int2: that the dammar is indistinguishable and is not a stalemate is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dammar catholicizes.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the dammar does catholicize and it is uninstructive.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it catholicizes and is uninstructive.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the ex-mayor is a monorchism.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the sprawler does edge musician.
sent16 -> int7: if the laureate is not cerebrovascular it is a kind of a past and is a monorchism.; sent13 -> int8: if that that the laureate does not erase prostitution and it is not hidrotic is false is true then it is not cerebrovascular.; sent15 -> int9: the fact that the laureate does not erase prostitution and it is not hidrotic is false if it does not blackmail em.; sent5 -> int10: the fact that if that that the laureate does not blackmail railway but it does blackmail em does not hold is right the laureate does not blackmail em is true.; sent19 -> int11: if the laureate singles then the fact that it does not blackmail railway and blackmails em is not right.; sent3 -> int12: the speedway does not erase Cathaya if that it is not culinary and it does not still is not correct.; sent4 & sent23 -> int13: the horseman is a allegretto and is a nominal.; int13 -> int14: the horseman is not non-nominal.; sent12 & int14 -> int15: that the speedway is both not culinary and not a still is false.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the speedway does not erase Cathaya.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it does not erase Cathaya.; int17 & sent9 -> int18: the butterfat is not nonfat and/or is not loamless.; sent25 & int18 -> int19: the trudger is loamless.; sent8 & int19 -> int20: the laureate is single.; int11 & int20 -> int21: that the laureate does not blackmail railway and blackmails em does not hold.; int10 & int21 -> int22: the laureate does not blackmail em.; int9 & int22 -> int23: that the laureate does not erase prostitution and it is not hidrotic does not hold.; int8 & int23 -> int24: the laureate is not cerebrovascular.; int7 & int24 -> int25: the laureate is past a monorchism.; int25 -> int26: something is a past and is a monorchism.; int26 & sent17 -> int27: the paintbox does catholicize.; int27 -> int28: there exists something such that it does catholicize.; int28 & sent11 -> int29: the ex-mayor is uninstructive and/or does edge musician.; int29 & sent6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ex-mayor is a monorchism or is past or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the ex-mayor is a monorchism if there is something such that it catholicizes and it is uninstructive. sent2: that the sprawler edges musician hold if the ex-mayor does edges musician. sent3: something does not erase Cathaya if the fact that it is not culinary and is not a kind of a still is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not edge sprawler is not wrong. sent5: if that something does not blackmail railway and does blackmail em does not hold it does not blackmail em. sent6: if the ex-mayor is uninstructive the sprawler does edge musician. sent7: the dammar is either tubal or past or both. sent8: if that the trudger is loamless is not wrong the laureate does single. sent9: the butterfat is not nonfat and/or it is not loamless if something does not erase Cathaya. sent10: if the paintbox does not edge musician that the dammar is indistinguishable and does not stalemate is false. sent11: if there exists something such that it does catholicize the ex-mayor either is uninstructive or does edge musician or both. sent12: if the horseman is nominal then that the speedway is both not culinary and not a still is not correct. sent13: if the fact that something does not erase prostitution and it is not hidrotic is incorrect then it is not cerebrovascular. sent14: the paintbox does not edge musician. sent15: that that something does not erase prostitution and is not hidrotic is incorrect if it does not blackmail em is not false. sent16: something is a kind of a past and it is a monorchism if it is not cerebrovascular. sent17: if something is not non-past but a monorchism the paintbox does catholicize. sent18: the dammar is uninstructive. sent19: the fact that something does not blackmail railway and blackmails em is not correct if that it is single is not false. sent20: the fact that either something is a kind of a monorchism or it is past or both is incorrect if it is not uninstructive. sent21: The musician does not edge paintbox. sent22: if the fact that something is indistinguishable and not a stalemate does not hold then it does catholicize. sent23: if there exists something such that it does not edge sprawler the horseman is a kind of a allegretto and is a kind of a nominal. sent24: the ex-mayor is uninstructive if something that is a monorchism is indistinguishable. sent25: the trudger is loamless if the butterfat is fatty or is not loamless or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: if that the dammar is a kind of indistinguishable thing that is not a kind of a stalemate is incorrect then it does catholicize.; sent10 & sent14 -> int2: that the dammar is indistinguishable and is not a stalemate is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dammar catholicizes.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the dammar does catholicize and it is uninstructive.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it catholicizes and is uninstructive.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the ex-mayor is a monorchism.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__