both the bubbling matchbook and the crutch happens if the repose does not occur.
sent1: both the bubbling matchbook and the dress occurs if the crutch does not occur. sent2: if the crimp does not occur then the crutch does not occur. sent3: if the bubbling stopping does not occur the affinity does not occur. sent4: if the penance does not occur but the unjustness happens the bubbling stopping does not occur. sent5: both the Eddy and the reposing occurs if the affinity does not occur. sent6: if that the clack occurs hold then that that both the impersonating napkin and the non-neuteringness happens is true is wrong. sent7: if that the impersonating napkin happens but the neutering does not occur is not right the fact that the crimping does not occur is correct. sent8: if the fact that the bubbling matchbook does not occur is true that the fact that not the bubbling Ionesco but the forcefulness happens is false is not false. sent9: the crutch occurs. sent10: that the reposing does not occur is prevented by the non-forcefulness. sent11: the maximalness happens and the crediting happens if the impersonating streetcar happens. sent12: that the repose occurs brings about that the bubbling matchbook occurs and the crutch happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bubbling matchbook does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the bubbling Ionesco does not occur but the forcefulness occurs is not right.;
the dressing happens and the Eddy happens.
$hypothesis$ = both the bubbling matchbook and the crutch happens if the repose does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the bubbling matchbook and the dress occurs if the crutch does not occur. sent2: if the crimp does not occur then the crutch does not occur. sent3: if the bubbling stopping does not occur the affinity does not occur. sent4: if the penance does not occur but the unjustness happens the bubbling stopping does not occur. sent5: both the Eddy and the reposing occurs if the affinity does not occur. sent6: if that the clack occurs hold then that that both the impersonating napkin and the non-neuteringness happens is true is wrong. sent7: if that the impersonating napkin happens but the neutering does not occur is not right the fact that the crimping does not occur is correct. sent8: if the fact that the bubbling matchbook does not occur is true that the fact that not the bubbling Ionesco but the forcefulness happens is false is not false. sent9: the crutch occurs. sent10: that the reposing does not occur is prevented by the non-forcefulness. sent11: the maximalness happens and the crediting happens if the impersonating streetcar happens. sent12: that the repose occurs brings about that the bubbling matchbook occurs and the crutch happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bubbling matchbook does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the bubbling Ionesco does not occur but the forcefulness occurs is not right.; __UNKNOWN__