the fact that the Penobscot is both a flatulence and paroxysmal does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the fact that that the cyma does damage petiole and is a kind of a flatulence is not wrong does not hold hold if it does not bethink howler. sent2: the Penobscot is paroxysmal if that the petiole does not damage petiole hold. sent3: That the petiole does not damage petiole is not wrong. sent4: that the petiole does not damage petiole is not wrong. sent5: the Penobscot does not damage petiole. sent6: the Penobscot is a flatulence if there exists something such that it does bethink howler. sent7: there is something such that it bethinks howler. sent8: if something is not a keratin but it is a kind of a Berber then it does not bethink howler.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the Penobscot is not non-paroxysmal.; sent7 & sent6 -> int2: the Penobscot is a flatulence.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the Penobscot is both a flatulence and paroxysmal hold is incorrect.
sent8 -> int3: the cyma does not bethink howler if it is not a keratin and it is a kind of a Berber.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Penobscot is both a flatulence and paroxysmal does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that that the cyma does damage petiole and is a kind of a flatulence is not wrong does not hold hold if it does not bethink howler. sent2: the Penobscot is paroxysmal if that the petiole does not damage petiole hold. sent3: That the petiole does not damage petiole is not wrong. sent4: that the petiole does not damage petiole is not wrong. sent5: the Penobscot does not damage petiole. sent6: the Penobscot is a flatulence if there exists something such that it does bethink howler. sent7: there is something such that it bethinks howler. sent8: if something is not a keratin but it is a kind of a Berber then it does not bethink howler. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the Penobscot is not non-paroxysmal.; sent7 & sent6 -> int2: the Penobscot is a flatulence.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__