if the epidemiologist is a kind of a cosmid the tribromoethanol does not assail Dormition.
sent1: the epidemiologist assails Dormition. sent2: if the fact that the epidemiologist does assail Dormition but it is not disreputable is not correct the intercom is a cosmid. sent3: the tribromoethanol is disreputable if the epidemiologist is cowardly. sent4: that the tribromoethanol assails Dormition is not false if the epidemiologist is a cosmid. sent5: if the tribromoethanol is a cosmid then the epidemiologist is not disreputable. sent6: that the tribromoethanol is disreputable is right. sent7: the fact that the tribromoethanol is not disreputable hold if it is cowardly and it assails Dormition.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epidemiologist is a cosmid.;
the intercom is cowardly.
$hypothesis$ = if the epidemiologist is a kind of a cosmid the tribromoethanol does not assail Dormition. ; $context$ = sent1: the epidemiologist assails Dormition. sent2: if the fact that the epidemiologist does assail Dormition but it is not disreputable is not correct the intercom is a cosmid. sent3: the tribromoethanol is disreputable if the epidemiologist is cowardly. sent4: that the tribromoethanol assails Dormition is not false if the epidemiologist is a cosmid. sent5: if the tribromoethanol is a cosmid then the epidemiologist is not disreputable. sent6: that the tribromoethanol is disreputable is right. sent7: the fact that the tribromoethanol is not disreputable hold if it is cowardly and it assails Dormition. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epidemiologist is a cosmid.; __UNKNOWN__