something is not rickettsial.
sent1: the somewhere squares. sent2: the bullpen is not a kind of a seam. sent3: the somewhere is not ribless if the bullpen is ribless. sent4: the fact that the somewhere is a kind of a overlip that is ribless is incorrect. sent5: the autoregulation is not astrological. sent6: the fact that the somewhere does not level Megaloptera is correct. sent7: something is not non-squared. sent8: if the bullpen is rickettsial then it is ribless. sent9: the mussel is not a kind of a overlip. sent10: the fact that something fidgets mazer and is not impotent is wrong if it does not torture. sent11: the fact that something is both a overlip and ribbed is wrong if it is non-astrological. sent12: the acetylcholine is not squared. sent13: that the mezereum is a overlip hold. sent14: the somewhere is ribbed. sent15: the somewhere is rickettsial but not astrological if the bullpen is astrological. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it levels Megaloptera is true. sent17: there is something such that it is rickettsial. sent18: that the somewhere is a overlip that is ribless is not true if it is non-astrological. sent19: that the bullpen is a overlip but not ribless is not right. sent20: something levels Megaloptera and it is a squared. sent21: if something is not astrological then that it is a kind of a overlip and it is ribless is not correct. sent22: if something is ribless thing that is not non-rickettsial the bullpen is not a overlip. sent23: the somewhere is a kind of a overlip that is not ribless if the bullpen is ribless.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bullpen is rickettsial.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the bullpen is ribless.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the somewhere is a overlip and not ribless.; sent11 -> int3: the fact that the somewhere is both a overlip and not ribless does not hold if it is not astrological.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not rickettsial. ; $context$ = sent1: the somewhere squares. sent2: the bullpen is not a kind of a seam. sent3: the somewhere is not ribless if the bullpen is ribless. sent4: the fact that the somewhere is a kind of a overlip that is ribless is incorrect. sent5: the autoregulation is not astrological. sent6: the fact that the somewhere does not level Megaloptera is correct. sent7: something is not non-squared. sent8: if the bullpen is rickettsial then it is ribless. sent9: the mussel is not a kind of a overlip. sent10: the fact that something fidgets mazer and is not impotent is wrong if it does not torture. sent11: the fact that something is both a overlip and ribbed is wrong if it is non-astrological. sent12: the acetylcholine is not squared. sent13: that the mezereum is a overlip hold. sent14: the somewhere is ribbed. sent15: the somewhere is rickettsial but not astrological if the bullpen is astrological. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it levels Megaloptera is true. sent17: there is something such that it is rickettsial. sent18: that the somewhere is a overlip that is ribless is not true if it is non-astrological. sent19: that the bullpen is a overlip but not ribless is not right. sent20: something levels Megaloptera and it is a squared. sent21: if something is not astrological then that it is a kind of a overlip and it is ribless is not correct. sent22: if something is ribless thing that is not non-rickettsial the bullpen is not a overlip. sent23: the somewhere is a kind of a overlip that is not ribless if the bullpen is ribless. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bullpen is rickettsial.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the bullpen is ribless.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the somewhere is a overlip and not ribless.; sent11 -> int3: the fact that the somewhere is both a overlip and not ribless does not hold if it is not astrological.; __UNKNOWN__