the oubliette is aperiodic.
sent1: something is not propagandist. sent2: if the fact that something is earlier and is a kind of a flippancy does not hold it is not monocarpic. sent3: if the fact that something is unairworthy thing that is a guard is incorrect then it does not frolic identification. sent4: if something is not a quirt then it is not aperiodic. sent5: that the oubliette is not unairworthy but it is a quirt is wrong if the saucepot is not impious. sent6: there is something such that it does not beam. sent7: if something is not a kind of a quirt it does not officialize baht. sent8: something is not catechistic if that it is a kind of obligated thing that officializes mold is not right. sent9: something does not officialize baht if that it is a kind of airworthy thing that is a kind of a quirt is not true. sent10: a unairworthy thing that is impious is not a kind of a quirt. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a beaming that the fact that the oubliette officializes baht and it is a quirt hold is not correct. sent12: there is something such that it is a beaming. sent13: if something does not realign rosebud then it does not officialize oubliette. sent14: the saucepot is unairworthy and it is not pious if there exists something such that it does not elbow mulligan. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not a propagandist then the amazon does not elbow mulligan. sent16: the oubliette is not a moray. sent17: something is not a Cardamine if the fact that it is a kind of a hatefulness that does frolic deferral does not hold. sent18: the oubliette is not aperiodic if it is not a kind of a quirt. sent19: the fact that the oubliette beams and it is a rugged is not right. sent20: something that is not clonic does not officialize amazon. sent21: something is non-aperiodic if the fact that it officializes baht and is a quirt is not right.
sent6 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the oubliette officializes baht and is a quirt does not hold.; sent21 -> int2: if the fact that that the oubliette does officialize baht and is a quirt is incorrect is not incorrect then it is not aperiodic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the oubliette is aperiodic.
sent9 -> int3: if that the oubliette is not unairworthy but it is a quirt does not hold then it does not officialize baht.;
$hypothesis$ = the oubliette is aperiodic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not propagandist. sent2: if the fact that something is earlier and is a kind of a flippancy does not hold it is not monocarpic. sent3: if the fact that something is unairworthy thing that is a guard is incorrect then it does not frolic identification. sent4: if something is not a quirt then it is not aperiodic. sent5: that the oubliette is not unairworthy but it is a quirt is wrong if the saucepot is not impious. sent6: there is something such that it does not beam. sent7: if something is not a kind of a quirt it does not officialize baht. sent8: something is not catechistic if that it is a kind of obligated thing that officializes mold is not right. sent9: something does not officialize baht if that it is a kind of airworthy thing that is a kind of a quirt is not true. sent10: a unairworthy thing that is impious is not a kind of a quirt. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a beaming that the fact that the oubliette officializes baht and it is a quirt hold is not correct. sent12: there is something such that it is a beaming. sent13: if something does not realign rosebud then it does not officialize oubliette. sent14: the saucepot is unairworthy and it is not pious if there exists something such that it does not elbow mulligan. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not a propagandist then the amazon does not elbow mulligan. sent16: the oubliette is not a moray. sent17: something is not a Cardamine if the fact that it is a kind of a hatefulness that does frolic deferral does not hold. sent18: the oubliette is not aperiodic if it is not a kind of a quirt. sent19: the fact that the oubliette beams and it is a rugged is not right. sent20: something that is not clonic does not officialize amazon. sent21: something is non-aperiodic if the fact that it officializes baht and is a quirt is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the oubliette officializes baht and is a quirt does not hold.; sent21 -> int2: if the fact that that the oubliette does officialize baht and is a quirt is incorrect is not incorrect then it is not aperiodic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__