that the demiglace does not flicker lobscouse and is eusporangiate does not hold.
sent1: the SCSI does geyser Ethelbert and is introversive. sent2: if the fact that the braid is not a kind of a burn is right then the fact that it is a bindery and/or is a Melophagus is not false. sent3: the Girondist is a kind of a biophysicist if the SCSI is a subscript. sent4: if the SCSI is not subscript the fact that that the Girondist does not call but it is a biophysicist is not incorrect is not true. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a biophysicist. sent6: if the petiole is hydrophobic or is a kind of a burn or both the braid does not burn. sent7: if the SCSI is eusporangiate then the demiglace does not flicker lobscouse. sent8: if the fact that the SCSI is eusporangiate hold the demiglace does not flicker lobscouse but it is eusporangiate. sent9: the expressway is a corkwood. sent10: the expressway does talc herbal. sent11: the Girondist is not a biophysicist if that it is not a call but a biophysicist does not hold. sent12: if the fact that something does not call and is a biophysicist is incorrect that it is not a biophysicist is true. sent13: the SCSI is eusporangiate if the Girondist is a subscript. sent14: if something is not a biophysicist and it is not introversive the Girondist is a subscript. sent15: there is something such that it is not a kind of a biophysicist and it is introversive. sent16: there is something such that it is not introversive. sent17: the demiglace does not flicker lobscouse. sent18: the microsporophyll is a bindery if the braid is a kind of a bindery. sent19: that the expressway is not a kind of a call but it is a biophysicist is false if there exists something such that it is not closed. sent20: there exists something such that it is a biophysicist but not introversive. sent21: something that talcs herbal and is a corkwood is not introversive. sent22: if the Girondist is a biophysicist it is introversive. sent23: there exists something such that it is not closed. sent24: The herbal does talc expressway. sent25: the Girondist talcs herbal and it does call. sent26: the fact that something does not flicker lobscouse but it is eusporangiate does not hold if it does not talc herbal. sent27: there exists something such that it is not subscript. sent28: there exists something such that it does close. sent29: the petiole is hydrophobic or it is a burn or both. sent30: the wicket-keeper is both not non-romaic and not closed if the microsporophyll is a kind of a bindery.
sent10 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the expressway talcs herbal and is a kind of a corkwood is right.; sent21 -> int2: if the expressway talcs herbal and it is a corkwood it is not introversive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the expressway is not introversive.; sent12 -> int4: the expressway is not a biophysicist if the fact that it does not call and it is a biophysicist does not hold.; sent23 & sent19 -> int5: the fact that the expressway is not a call and is a biophysicist is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the expressway is not a biophysicist.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the expressway is not a biophysicist and it is not introversive.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is both not a biophysicist and not introversive.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the Girondist is a subscript.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the SCSI is not non-eusporangiate.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the expressway is eusporangiate.
sent25 -> int11: the Girondist talcs herbal.;
$hypothesis$ = that the demiglace does not flicker lobscouse and is eusporangiate does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the SCSI does geyser Ethelbert and is introversive. sent2: if the fact that the braid is not a kind of a burn is right then the fact that it is a bindery and/or is a Melophagus is not false. sent3: the Girondist is a kind of a biophysicist if the SCSI is a subscript. sent4: if the SCSI is not subscript the fact that that the Girondist does not call but it is a biophysicist is not incorrect is not true. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a biophysicist. sent6: if the petiole is hydrophobic or is a kind of a burn or both the braid does not burn. sent7: if the SCSI is eusporangiate then the demiglace does not flicker lobscouse. sent8: if the fact that the SCSI is eusporangiate hold the demiglace does not flicker lobscouse but it is eusporangiate. sent9: the expressway is a corkwood. sent10: the expressway does talc herbal. sent11: the Girondist is not a biophysicist if that it is not a call but a biophysicist does not hold. sent12: if the fact that something does not call and is a biophysicist is incorrect that it is not a biophysicist is true. sent13: the SCSI is eusporangiate if the Girondist is a subscript. sent14: if something is not a biophysicist and it is not introversive the Girondist is a subscript. sent15: there is something such that it is not a kind of a biophysicist and it is introversive. sent16: there is something such that it is not introversive. sent17: the demiglace does not flicker lobscouse. sent18: the microsporophyll is a bindery if the braid is a kind of a bindery. sent19: that the expressway is not a kind of a call but it is a biophysicist is false if there exists something such that it is not closed. sent20: there exists something such that it is a biophysicist but not introversive. sent21: something that talcs herbal and is a corkwood is not introversive. sent22: if the Girondist is a biophysicist it is introversive. sent23: there exists something such that it is not closed. sent24: The herbal does talc expressway. sent25: the Girondist talcs herbal and it does call. sent26: the fact that something does not flicker lobscouse but it is eusporangiate does not hold if it does not talc herbal. sent27: there exists something such that it is not subscript. sent28: there exists something such that it does close. sent29: the petiole is hydrophobic or it is a burn or both. sent30: the wicket-keeper is both not non-romaic and not closed if the microsporophyll is a kind of a bindery. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the expressway talcs herbal and is a kind of a corkwood is right.; sent21 -> int2: if the expressway talcs herbal and it is a corkwood it is not introversive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the expressway is not introversive.; sent12 -> int4: the expressway is not a biophysicist if the fact that it does not call and it is a biophysicist does not hold.; sent23 & sent19 -> int5: the fact that the expressway is not a call and is a biophysicist is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the expressway is not a biophysicist.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the expressway is not a biophysicist and it is not introversive.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is both not a biophysicist and not introversive.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the Girondist is a subscript.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the SCSI is not non-eusporangiate.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__