the fact that the pancreatin is either a worst or not a caring or both is incorrect.
sent1: something does gather kipper if it is a romantic. sent2: if the tarot is a cytophotometry the aerobe is menstrual. sent3: the tessera is both not a perseverance and not a cesspool if there exists something such that it is a Kroeber. sent4: something is a Kroeber. sent5: the pancreatin is a romantic if the aerobe is menstrual. sent6: the fact that the tessera is not a perseverance and it is not a cesspool is false if the tarot does not invoke anemometry. sent7: if that something invokes anemometry is right then it is a kind of a cytophotometry. sent8: if something does gather kipper then that either it is a worst or it does not care or both is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tarot does not invoke anemometry.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the tessera is both not a perseverance and not a cesspool is not right.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the tessera is not a perseverance and is not a cesspool.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tarot invokes anemometry.; sent7 -> int5: the tarot is a kind of a cytophotometry if it invokes anemometry.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the tarot is a kind of a cytophotometry.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the aerobe is menstrual.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the pancreatin is a kind of a romantic.; sent1 -> int9: the pancreatin gathers kipper if it is romantic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the pancreatin gathers kipper.; sent8 -> int11: if the fact that the pancreatin gathers kipper is not wrong then the fact that it worsts or it does not care or both does not hold.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pancreatin is either a worst or not a caring or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something does gather kipper if it is a romantic. sent2: if the tarot is a cytophotometry the aerobe is menstrual. sent3: the tessera is both not a perseverance and not a cesspool if there exists something such that it is a Kroeber. sent4: something is a Kroeber. sent5: the pancreatin is a romantic if the aerobe is menstrual. sent6: the fact that the tessera is not a perseverance and it is not a cesspool is false if the tarot does not invoke anemometry. sent7: if that something invokes anemometry is right then it is a kind of a cytophotometry. sent8: if something does gather kipper then that either it is a worst or it does not care or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tarot does not invoke anemometry.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the tessera is both not a perseverance and not a cesspool is not right.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the tessera is not a perseverance and is not a cesspool.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tarot invokes anemometry.; sent7 -> int5: the tarot is a kind of a cytophotometry if it invokes anemometry.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the tarot is a kind of a cytophotometry.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the aerobe is menstrual.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the pancreatin is a kind of a romantic.; sent1 -> int9: the pancreatin gathers kipper if it is romantic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the pancreatin gathers kipper.; sent8 -> int11: if the fact that the pancreatin gathers kipper is not wrong then the fact that it worsts or it does not care or both does not hold.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__