that that the telencephalon is not an appraiser and it is not stylish is incorrect if the exhalation is a kind of an intellectual does not hold.
sent1: the telencephalon is not an appraiser and it is not stylish if the exhalation is an intellectual. sent2: the potluck is not an appraiser. sent3: if something is not an intellectual that it does not wake creepiness and it does not mound is not true. sent4: something is not an intellectual and it is not a kind of an appraiser. sent5: the exhalation is both not a legionnaire and not a honk. sent6: something is not an appraiser. sent7: that the telencephalon is not an intellectual and not stylish does not hold. sent8: there is something such that it is an appraiser and it is not stylish. sent9: that the exhalation is both not an appraiser and not intellectual is not correct. sent10: if something that is not an appraiser is stylish then the exhalation is not an intellectual. sent11: there is something such that it is not stylish. sent12: the fact that the exhalation is a kind of non-stylish thing that is not a kind of an appraiser is not true if the telencephalon is a kind of an intellectual. sent13: if there is something such that it is not an appraiser and it is not stylish that the exhalation is a kind of an intellectual hold. sent14: that the exhalation is not an intellectual is correct if something that is not an appraiser is not stylish. sent15: the fact that the telencephalon is an appraiser and is not stylish is not correct. sent16: if the exhalation is intellectual then the fact that the telencephalon is an appraiser but not stylish is not right. sent17: that the telencephalon is not a kind of an appraiser but it is stylish is wrong. sent18: if the exhalation is a kind of an intellectual then the fact that the telencephalon is not a kind of an appraiser but it is not non-stylish does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the telencephalon is not an appraiser and not stylish.; assump2 -> int1: something is not an appraiser and is not stylish.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the exhalation is not an intellectual.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exhalation is intellectual.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the telencephalon is not an appraiser and not stylish is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the tinsel does not wake creepiness and is not a kind of a mound is false.
sent3 -> int5: that the tinsel does not wake creepiness and it does not mound is not correct if it is not intellectual.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the telencephalon is not an appraiser and it is not stylish is incorrect if the exhalation is a kind of an intellectual does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the telencephalon is not an appraiser and it is not stylish if the exhalation is an intellectual. sent2: the potluck is not an appraiser. sent3: if something is not an intellectual that it does not wake creepiness and it does not mound is not true. sent4: something is not an intellectual and it is not a kind of an appraiser. sent5: the exhalation is both not a legionnaire and not a honk. sent6: something is not an appraiser. sent7: that the telencephalon is not an intellectual and not stylish does not hold. sent8: there is something such that it is an appraiser and it is not stylish. sent9: that the exhalation is both not an appraiser and not intellectual is not correct. sent10: if something that is not an appraiser is stylish then the exhalation is not an intellectual. sent11: there is something such that it is not stylish. sent12: the fact that the exhalation is a kind of non-stylish thing that is not a kind of an appraiser is not true if the telencephalon is a kind of an intellectual. sent13: if there is something such that it is not an appraiser and it is not stylish that the exhalation is a kind of an intellectual hold. sent14: that the exhalation is not an intellectual is correct if something that is not an appraiser is not stylish. sent15: the fact that the telencephalon is an appraiser and is not stylish is not correct. sent16: if the exhalation is intellectual then the fact that the telencephalon is an appraiser but not stylish is not right. sent17: that the telencephalon is not a kind of an appraiser but it is stylish is wrong. sent18: if the exhalation is a kind of an intellectual then the fact that the telencephalon is not a kind of an appraiser but it is not non-stylish does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the telencephalon is not an appraiser and not stylish.; assump2 -> int1: something is not an appraiser and is not stylish.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the exhalation is not an intellectual.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exhalation is intellectual.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the telencephalon is not an appraiser and not stylish is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__