the elsholtzia is a Opisthognathidae.
sent1: if something is not a cider and/or it does not resent bridge it is a draper. sent2: the fact that the elsholtzia is a bait is correct if it is a draper. sent3: there exists something such that it is pugilistic. sent4: if something is not a cider then the fact that it is a draper is not wrong. sent5: the elsholtzia is a Opisthognathidae if it is a bait. sent6: the elsholtzia is not a kind of a cider and/or it does not resent bridge if there is something such that it is pugilistic.
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the elsholtzia is not a cider or it does not resent bridge or both.; sent1 -> int2: the elsholtzia is a draper if it is not a cider or it does not resent bridge or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the elsholtzia is a draper.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the elsholtzia is a kind of a bait.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the elsholtzia is a Opisthognathidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a cider and/or it does not resent bridge it is a draper. sent2: the fact that the elsholtzia is a bait is correct if it is a draper. sent3: there exists something such that it is pugilistic. sent4: if something is not a cider then the fact that it is a draper is not wrong. sent5: the elsholtzia is a Opisthognathidae if it is a bait. sent6: the elsholtzia is not a kind of a cider and/or it does not resent bridge if there is something such that it is pugilistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the elsholtzia is not a cider or it does not resent bridge or both.; sent1 -> int2: the elsholtzia is a draper if it is not a cider or it does not resent bridge or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the elsholtzia is a draper.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the elsholtzia is a kind of a bait.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__