if the cogitativeness occurs the leaping does not occur.
sent1: the immunoassay but not the providing lateen occurs. sent2: if that the scientificness and the leaping occurs is wrong then that the titrating does not occur hold. sent3: the radiophotography occurs and the strongness does not occur. sent4: the cohabiting occurs. sent5: the diet happens. sent6: the emasculation happens. sent7: the sheltering Langmuir does not occur. sent8: that the biting but not the serologicness happens causes the titrating. sent9: the untwining occurs. sent10: both the bit and the non-serologicness occurs. sent11: if the azidoness and the scattering happens the fact that the Polo occurs is correct. sent12: if the top-downness does not occur then that the unscientificness does not occur but the leap happens does not hold. sent13: that the sheltering saber occurs but the discourtesy does not occur prevents that the miscalculation does not occur. sent14: the inconsolableness does not occur if both the insufficientness and the alimentativeness happens. sent15: if the titrating does not occur then both the providing gunite and the cogitativeness occurs. sent16: if the epicureanness happens and the providing cefuroxime happens then the cultivation occurs. sent17: the unstoppableness occurs. sent18: if the piping steaming but not the radiophotography happens the about-facing happens. sent19: the decomposing does not occur. sent20: the jumping Rhinoptera occurs. sent21: if the titrating and the cogitativeness happens then the fact that the leap does not occur is not wrong. sent22: that the relations does not occur is caused by that the piping quibbler and the intracranialness happens. sent23: if the calendricness happens then that the fit does not occur is not incorrect.
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the titrating occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cogitativeness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the titrating happens and the cogitativeness occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the leaping does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the providing gunite happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the cogitativeness occurs the leaping does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the immunoassay but not the providing lateen occurs. sent2: if that the scientificness and the leaping occurs is wrong then that the titrating does not occur hold. sent3: the radiophotography occurs and the strongness does not occur. sent4: the cohabiting occurs. sent5: the diet happens. sent6: the emasculation happens. sent7: the sheltering Langmuir does not occur. sent8: that the biting but not the serologicness happens causes the titrating. sent9: the untwining occurs. sent10: both the bit and the non-serologicness occurs. sent11: if the azidoness and the scattering happens the fact that the Polo occurs is correct. sent12: if the top-downness does not occur then that the unscientificness does not occur but the leap happens does not hold. sent13: that the sheltering saber occurs but the discourtesy does not occur prevents that the miscalculation does not occur. sent14: the inconsolableness does not occur if both the insufficientness and the alimentativeness happens. sent15: if the titrating does not occur then both the providing gunite and the cogitativeness occurs. sent16: if the epicureanness happens and the providing cefuroxime happens then the cultivation occurs. sent17: the unstoppableness occurs. sent18: if the piping steaming but not the radiophotography happens the about-facing happens. sent19: the decomposing does not occur. sent20: the jumping Rhinoptera occurs. sent21: if the titrating and the cogitativeness happens then the fact that the leap does not occur is not wrong. sent22: that the relations does not occur is caused by that the piping quibbler and the intracranialness happens. sent23: if the calendricness happens then that the fit does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the titrating occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cogitativeness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the titrating happens and the cogitativeness occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the leaping does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__