the fact that not the patronaging defamation but the visitation occurs is not right.
sent1: if that the crosscheck does not occur and the squalling does not occur does not hold the prematureness does not occur. sent2: that the crosscheck happens but the prematureness does not occur results in the intemperateness. sent3: the prematureness does not occur if the crosscheck occurs. sent4: that the prematureness occurs is triggered by that the patronaging defamation does not occur and the visitation happens. sent5: that the squalling does not occur and the prematureness does not occur is not true if the retrial happens. sent6: the fact that the crosscheck but not the squall happens does not hold. sent7: the visitation occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the patronaging defamation but the visitation happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the prematureness happens.;
the temperateness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the patronaging defamation but the visitation occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the crosscheck does not occur and the squalling does not occur does not hold the prematureness does not occur. sent2: that the crosscheck happens but the prematureness does not occur results in the intemperateness. sent3: the prematureness does not occur if the crosscheck occurs. sent4: that the prematureness occurs is triggered by that the patronaging defamation does not occur and the visitation happens. sent5: that the squalling does not occur and the prematureness does not occur is not true if the retrial happens. sent6: the fact that the crosscheck but not the squall happens does not hold. sent7: the visitation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the patronaging defamation but the visitation happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the prematureness happens.; __UNKNOWN__