that the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur prevents that the liberalization happens.
sent1: if the fact that the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur hold then the liberalization occurs. sent2: both the nonindustrialness and the vertebralness happens if the fact that the instrumenting buttinsky happens is correct. sent3: if the lunacy does not occur the stenographicness does not occur. sent4: that both the liberalization and the erasure happens is triggered by that the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur. sent5: that the adequateness does not occur is brought about by that the airstream does not occur. sent6: that the cotillion does not occur and the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur is brought about by that the claiming does not occur. sent7: if the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur not the liberalization but the erasure happens. sent8: the liberalization occurs. sent9: the claiming does not occur if the fact that that the artlessness occurs and the claiming occurs is not false is incorrect. sent10: the erasure occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: not the liberalization but the erasure occurs.; int1 -> int2: the liberalization does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the cotillion does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur prevents that the liberalization happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur hold then the liberalization occurs. sent2: both the nonindustrialness and the vertebralness happens if the fact that the instrumenting buttinsky happens is correct. sent3: if the lunacy does not occur the stenographicness does not occur. sent4: that both the liberalization and the erasure happens is triggered by that the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur. sent5: that the adequateness does not occur is brought about by that the airstream does not occur. sent6: that the cotillion does not occur and the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur is brought about by that the claiming does not occur. sent7: if the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur not the liberalization but the erasure happens. sent8: the liberalization occurs. sent9: the claiming does not occur if the fact that that the artlessness occurs and the claiming occurs is not false is incorrect. sent10: the erasure occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the instrumenting buttinsky does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: not the liberalization but the erasure occurs.; int1 -> int2: the liberalization does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__