the abductor is not fibrocalcific and it does not desexualize waveguide.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Frasera then the abductor is a kind of a Jacobs that does medicate shaitan. sent2: the chewer is not a knower if the Karelian does not desexualize waveguide. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Frasera. sent4: the kunzite does not medicate shaitan if the Delicious is not a purity. sent5: that if that something is a kind of a purity but it is not subjective is not right it is not a purity is not false. sent6: the Delicious is not a purity. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of non-fibrocalcific thing that does not desexualize waveguide does not hold if it is not a knower. sent8: if that something is a kind of a bout and it is a purity is wrong then the fact that it is not representational hold. sent9: the abductor does not desexualize waveguide if the Karelian is not a kind of a knower. sent10: the abductor is not fibrocalcific if there exists something such that that it is not a bout and is nonrepresentational is not right. sent11: that the Karelian is not a kind of a knower is right if the kunzite is not unsent. sent12: the fact that the argyle is not a bout and not representational is incorrect. sent13: if the abductor does medicate shaitan and is not representational it is not a knower. sent14: the fact that the Karelian is a purity but not subjective is not right. sent15: if the fact that something mounds laudator or it is not unsent or both is wrong it medicates shaitan.
sent15 -> int1: if that the kunzite does mound laudator and/or it is not unsent is wrong then it medicates shaitan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the kunzite mounds laudator and/or it is not unsent is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the kunzite does medicate shaitan.; sent4 & sent6 -> int3: the kunzite does not medicate shaitan.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: either the kunzite does mound laudator or it is not unsent or both.; sent12 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a bout and it is not representational is not right.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the abductor is not fibrocalcific.;
the fact that the abductor is not fibrocalcific and it does not desexualize waveguide does not hold.
sent7 -> int8: the fact that if the abductor is not the knower then the fact that the abductor is non-fibrocalcific thing that does not desexualize waveguide does not hold is not incorrect.; sent3 & sent1 -> int9: the abductor is a kind of a Jacobs and it medicates shaitan.; int9 -> int10: the abductor medicates shaitan.; sent8 -> int11: the abductor is not representational if that it is a bout and a purity is not right.; sent5 -> int12: if the fact that the Karelian is a kind of a purity but it is not subjective is not right it is not a purity.; int12 & sent14 -> int13: the Karelian is not a kind of a purity.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not a purity.;
$hypothesis$ = the abductor is not fibrocalcific and it does not desexualize waveguide. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Frasera then the abductor is a kind of a Jacobs that does medicate shaitan. sent2: the chewer is not a knower if the Karelian does not desexualize waveguide. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Frasera. sent4: the kunzite does not medicate shaitan if the Delicious is not a purity. sent5: that if that something is a kind of a purity but it is not subjective is not right it is not a purity is not false. sent6: the Delicious is not a purity. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of non-fibrocalcific thing that does not desexualize waveguide does not hold if it is not a knower. sent8: if that something is a kind of a bout and it is a purity is wrong then the fact that it is not representational hold. sent9: the abductor does not desexualize waveguide if the Karelian is not a kind of a knower. sent10: the abductor is not fibrocalcific if there exists something such that that it is not a bout and is nonrepresentational is not right. sent11: that the Karelian is not a kind of a knower is right if the kunzite is not unsent. sent12: the fact that the argyle is not a bout and not representational is incorrect. sent13: if the abductor does medicate shaitan and is not representational it is not a knower. sent14: the fact that the Karelian is a purity but not subjective is not right. sent15: if the fact that something mounds laudator or it is not unsent or both is wrong it medicates shaitan. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if that the kunzite does mound laudator and/or it is not unsent is wrong then it medicates shaitan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the kunzite mounds laudator and/or it is not unsent is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the kunzite does medicate shaitan.; sent4 & sent6 -> int3: the kunzite does not medicate shaitan.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: either the kunzite does mound laudator or it is not unsent or both.; sent12 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a bout and it is not representational is not right.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the abductor is not fibrocalcific.; __UNKNOWN__