that there is something such that if it whiffs visor it does not shampoo and is vehicular does not hold.
sent1: if the library does whiff visor then it is a shampoo and it is vehicular. sent2: there exists something such that if it does whiff visor it is vehicular. sent3: there exists something such that if it whiffs visor it does not shampoo. sent4: the library is not a shampoo and monetizes beroe if it is warmed. sent5: there is something such that if it is corvine then it does not monetize library and it is indexical. sent6: something is not a rubric and is complimentary if the fact that it is not a kind of a cook is not correct. sent7: the library is not vehicular and is counterterror if it is telegraphic. sent8: there exists something such that if it whiffs visor it does shampoo and it is vehicular. sent9: there is something such that if it is a kind of a pentose it is not a ratline and depresses. sent10: the caretaker is not a rotenone but it whiffs visor if it is an invocation. sent11: the library does not whiff Gibbon and meshes incidental if it does shampoo. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a polluter then it is not uncongenial and does mesh Koestler. sent13: the library does not shampoo but it is vehicular if it whiffs visor. sent14: if the library does whiff visor then it is vehicular. sent15: the manila does not design curtailment but it meshes public if it shampoos. sent16: the library does not whiff visor but it is pleasant if it is complimentary.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a cook it is not a rubric but complimentary.
sent6 -> int1: the tarsal is not a kind of a rubric but it is not uncomplimentary if the fact that it is a cook hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it whiffs visor it does not shampoo and is vehicular does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the library does whiff visor then it is a shampoo and it is vehicular. sent2: there exists something such that if it does whiff visor it is vehicular. sent3: there exists something such that if it whiffs visor it does not shampoo. sent4: the library is not a shampoo and monetizes beroe if it is warmed. sent5: there is something such that if it is corvine then it does not monetize library and it is indexical. sent6: something is not a rubric and is complimentary if the fact that it is not a kind of a cook is not correct. sent7: the library is not vehicular and is counterterror if it is telegraphic. sent8: there exists something such that if it whiffs visor it does shampoo and it is vehicular. sent9: there is something such that if it is a kind of a pentose it is not a ratline and depresses. sent10: the caretaker is not a rotenone but it whiffs visor if it is an invocation. sent11: the library does not whiff Gibbon and meshes incidental if it does shampoo. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a polluter then it is not uncongenial and does mesh Koestler. sent13: the library does not shampoo but it is vehicular if it whiffs visor. sent14: if the library does whiff visor then it is vehicular. sent15: the manila does not design curtailment but it meshes public if it shampoos. sent16: the library does not whiff visor but it is pleasant if it is complimentary. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__