that the crawlspace is not a kind of a penology and/or is not a kind of a neuropsychiatry is wrong.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a penology the steakhouse is a kind of a penology or it is xeric or both. sent2: the crawlspace is xeric if it is not a kind of a neuropsychiatry. sent3: if something dances hummer then it is a arccosecant. sent4: something is xeric if it is not a kind of a penology. sent5: the couscous is a penology and is a neuropsychiatry if the fact that something is a kind of a arccosecant is not wrong. sent6: the bandwagon does dance hummer and is an embrace. sent7: the crawlspace is not xeric.
sent4 -> int1: if the crawlspace is not a penology it is xeric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crawlspace is not a penology and/or it is not a neuropsychiatry.; int1 & assump1 & sent2 -> int2: the crawlspace is xeric.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the skilletfish is not xeric.
sent3 -> int4: if the bandwagon dances hummer then it is a arccosecant.; sent6 -> int5: the bandwagon dances hummer.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the bandwagon is a arccosecant is right.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a arccosecant.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the couscous is a penology and it is a neuropsychiatry.; int8 -> int9: that the couscous is a penology hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a penology.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the steakhouse is a penology and/or it is xeric.;
$hypothesis$ = that the crawlspace is not a kind of a penology and/or is not a kind of a neuropsychiatry is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a penology the steakhouse is a kind of a penology or it is xeric or both. sent2: the crawlspace is xeric if it is not a kind of a neuropsychiatry. sent3: if something dances hummer then it is a arccosecant. sent4: something is xeric if it is not a kind of a penology. sent5: the couscous is a penology and is a neuropsychiatry if the fact that something is a kind of a arccosecant is not wrong. sent6: the bandwagon does dance hummer and is an embrace. sent7: the crawlspace is not xeric. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the crawlspace is not a penology it is xeric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crawlspace is not a penology and/or it is not a neuropsychiatry.; int1 & assump1 & sent2 -> int2: the crawlspace is xeric.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__