the sandpiper is a misconstrual.
sent1: the Amish is not a kind of a shaft if there exists something such that that it does overuse jagged and is a Munch is incorrect. sent2: that if that the Amish is not a shaft hold the primitive cartwheels and/or it is not a bushman is correct. sent3: if there exists something such that that it does not overuse Brno and harvests Garnier is not right the ascospore is a kind of a taurine. sent4: if the ascospore tips tanager then the paillasse is a taurine. sent5: the fact that something is a kind of a misconstrual that does not inherit is false if the fact that it is not a smirker hold. sent6: that the saber is uncongenial but it does not inherit is not right. sent7: the saber does not inherit. sent8: the pinger is a taurine. sent9: if the lithomancer is a kind of a misconstrual the sandpiper is a smirker. sent10: the paillasse is not a kind of a Yuman if that the primitive is not a kind of a bushman hold. sent11: if something is taurine then the fact that it is not uncongenial and does not tip tanager does not hold. sent12: if the lithomancer is not a smirker that the ascospore does tip tanager hold. sent13: if the saber is taurine that the paillasse does inherit is not wrong. sent14: the saber is uncongenial and does not inherit if that the lithomancer is uncongenial is right. sent15: the saber is taurine. sent16: the fact that the saber does not inherit is not false if the lithomancer is uncongenial. sent17: if something is a smirker then it is uncongenial. sent18: there is something such that that it does overuse jagged and it is a Munch is wrong. sent19: if the paillasse is a misconstrual the fact that it is a taurine is correct. sent20: that the saber is a kind of uncongenial thing that does inherit is wrong. sent21: the ascospore inherits. sent22: something is taurine if it is a kind of a smirker. sent23: if the primitive is a kind of a cartwheel then the paillasse is not a kind of a Yuman. sent24: the fact that something does not overuse Brno and harvests Garnier does not hold if the fact that it is not a Yuman is not incorrect. sent25: the saber is not a smirker if there exists something such that that it is not uncongenial and it does not tip tanager does not hold.
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the lithomancer is a smirker is not incorrect it is uncongenial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lithomancer is a smirker.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lithomancer is uncongenial.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the saber is uncongenial and does not inherit.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the lithomancer is not a kind of a smirker is not wrong.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the ascospore tips tanager.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the paillasse is taurine.;
the sandpiper is not a misconstrual.
sent5 -> int8: if the saber is not a kind of a smirker then that it is a kind of a misconstrual that does not inherit is wrong.; sent11 -> int9: the fact that the ascospore is not uncongenial and it does not tip tanager is false if it is a taurine.; sent24 -> int10: if the paillasse is not a kind of a Yuman the fact that it does not overuse Brno and it harvests Garnier does not hold.; sent18 & sent1 -> int11: the Amish does not shaft.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: the primitive cartwheels or is not a bushman or both.; int12 & sent23 & sent10 -> int13: the paillasse is not Yuman.; int10 & int13 -> int14: that the paillasse does not overuse Brno but it does harvest Garnier does not hold.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that the fact that it does not overuse Brno and does harvest Garnier does not hold.; int15 & sent3 -> int16: the ascospore is a taurine.; int9 & int16 -> int17: that the ascospore is not uncongenial and it does not tip tanager does not hold.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not uncongenial and it does not tip tanager does not hold.; int18 & sent25 -> int19: the saber is not a smirker.; int8 & int19 -> int20: the fact that the saber is a misconstrual that does not inherit is not true.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that that it is a misconstrual that does not inherit is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the sandpiper is a misconstrual. ; $context$ = sent1: the Amish is not a kind of a shaft if there exists something such that that it does overuse jagged and is a Munch is incorrect. sent2: that if that the Amish is not a shaft hold the primitive cartwheels and/or it is not a bushman is correct. sent3: if there exists something such that that it does not overuse Brno and harvests Garnier is not right the ascospore is a kind of a taurine. sent4: if the ascospore tips tanager then the paillasse is a taurine. sent5: the fact that something is a kind of a misconstrual that does not inherit is false if the fact that it is not a smirker hold. sent6: that the saber is uncongenial but it does not inherit is not right. sent7: the saber does not inherit. sent8: the pinger is a taurine. sent9: if the lithomancer is a kind of a misconstrual the sandpiper is a smirker. sent10: the paillasse is not a kind of a Yuman if that the primitive is not a kind of a bushman hold. sent11: if something is taurine then the fact that it is not uncongenial and does not tip tanager does not hold. sent12: if the lithomancer is not a smirker that the ascospore does tip tanager hold. sent13: if the saber is taurine that the paillasse does inherit is not wrong. sent14: the saber is uncongenial and does not inherit if that the lithomancer is uncongenial is right. sent15: the saber is taurine. sent16: the fact that the saber does not inherit is not false if the lithomancer is uncongenial. sent17: if something is a smirker then it is uncongenial. sent18: there is something such that that it does overuse jagged and it is a Munch is wrong. sent19: if the paillasse is a misconstrual the fact that it is a taurine is correct. sent20: that the saber is a kind of uncongenial thing that does inherit is wrong. sent21: the ascospore inherits. sent22: something is taurine if it is a kind of a smirker. sent23: if the primitive is a kind of a cartwheel then the paillasse is not a kind of a Yuman. sent24: the fact that something does not overuse Brno and harvests Garnier does not hold if the fact that it is not a Yuman is not incorrect. sent25: the saber is not a smirker if there exists something such that that it is not uncongenial and it does not tip tanager does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the lithomancer is a smirker is not incorrect it is uncongenial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lithomancer is a smirker.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lithomancer is uncongenial.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the saber is uncongenial and does not inherit.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the lithomancer is not a kind of a smirker is not wrong.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the ascospore tips tanager.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the paillasse is taurine.; __UNKNOWN__