the fact that the measurer does not knot tendentiousness but it is a mosaicism does not hold.
sent1: the measurer is a candlestick. sent2: the Carrel is filarial. sent3: everything is not a trey. sent4: the measurer is cenogenetic but it does not knot tendentiousness if it is a candlestick. sent5: the fact that something does whelp and is not filarial does not hold if the fact that it is healthy is not wrong. sent6: the use is cenogenetic. sent7: the use is not cenogenetic if there is something such that it does whelp and it is filarial. sent8: something is filarial. sent9: if something is not a trey then the fact that it does knot Barthelme and knots everlastingness is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Carrel does whelp is not wrong.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the Carrel whelps and it is filarial.; int1 -> int2: something does whelp and it is filarial.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the use is not cenogenetic.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Carrel does not whelp.;
the measurer does not knot tendentiousness but it is a mosaicism.
sent4 & sent1 -> int6: the measurer is cenogenetic and does not knot tendentiousness.; int6 -> int7: the measurer does not knot tendentiousness.; sent5 -> int8: if the measurer is healthy that it whelps and is not filarial is not correct.; sent9 -> int9: if the undoer is not a trey that it knots Barthelme and it does knot everlastingness is not correct.; sent3 -> int10: the undoer is not a trey.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the undoer does knot Barthelme and it knots everlastingness does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there is nothing such that it knots Barthelme and knots everlastingness.; int12 -> int13: that the use does knot Barthelme and does knot everlastingness does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the measurer does not knot tendentiousness but it is a mosaicism does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the measurer is a candlestick. sent2: the Carrel is filarial. sent3: everything is not a trey. sent4: the measurer is cenogenetic but it does not knot tendentiousness if it is a candlestick. sent5: the fact that something does whelp and is not filarial does not hold if the fact that it is healthy is not wrong. sent6: the use is cenogenetic. sent7: the use is not cenogenetic if there is something such that it does whelp and it is filarial. sent8: something is filarial. sent9: if something is not a trey then the fact that it does knot Barthelme and knots everlastingness is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Carrel does whelp is not wrong.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the Carrel whelps and it is filarial.; int1 -> int2: something does whelp and it is filarial.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the use is not cenogenetic.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Carrel does not whelp.; __UNKNOWN__