the fact that the fact that the thermistor is not a hemiparasite but it is not theatrical is not right is not wrong.
sent1: the tattletale is not meaty. sent2: if the diffraction is not meaty then the tattletale is not untheatrical. sent3: the fact that the thermistor is a molter that does circularize advisory does not hold. sent4: if something is not an odometer then that it is a Victorian and not a buffalo does not hold. sent5: the fact that the diffraction is a despondency and overpays is wrong if the tattletale is not meaty. sent6: if the fact that the serger is Victorian but it is not a buffalo does not hold then the levator is a kind of an immune. sent7: the thermistor is not a hemiparasite if the diffraction does not overpay. sent8: the diffraction is not mucosal. sent9: there exists something such that it is an immune. sent10: the thermistor is a kind of non-meaty thing that is a molter. sent11: if something is non-mucosal a molter then it is untheatrical. sent12: that everything is not an odometer hold. sent13: the thermistor is a kind of a molter if something is not immune. sent14: the thermistor is both not a Stravinsky and unreceptive. sent15: the thermistor is a molter. sent16: if there are non-immune things the thermistor is a kind of non-mucosal a molter. sent17: if that the diffraction is a despondency and does overpay does not hold then the thermistor is not a hemiparasite. sent18: the diffraction is not mucosal if the fact that the levator is an immune is correct. sent19: there is something such that it is not an immune.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: that the diffraction is a despondency and does overpay does not hold.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the thermistor is not a kind of a hemiparasite.; sent11 -> int3: if the thermistor is non-mucosal thing that is a kind of a molter it is untheatrical.; sent19 & sent16 -> int4: the thermistor is not mucosal but it is a molter.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the thermistor is untheatrical hold.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the thermistor is not a hemiparasite but it is untheatrical is false.
sent4 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the quadruplicate is Victorian but it does not buffalo is right is incorrect if it is not a kind of an odometer.; sent12 -> int7: that the quadruplicate is not an odometer hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the quadruplicate is a Victorian and is not a buffalo is false.; int8 -> int9: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a Victorian and is not a kind of a buffalo.; int9 -> int10: that the serger is a kind of a Victorian but it is not a kind of a buffalo does not hold.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the levator is an immune.; int11 & sent18 -> int12: the diffraction is not mucosal.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the thermistor is not a hemiparasite but it is not theatrical is not right is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the tattletale is not meaty. sent2: if the diffraction is not meaty then the tattletale is not untheatrical. sent3: the fact that the thermistor is a molter that does circularize advisory does not hold. sent4: if something is not an odometer then that it is a Victorian and not a buffalo does not hold. sent5: the fact that the diffraction is a despondency and overpays is wrong if the tattletale is not meaty. sent6: if the fact that the serger is Victorian but it is not a buffalo does not hold then the levator is a kind of an immune. sent7: the thermistor is not a hemiparasite if the diffraction does not overpay. sent8: the diffraction is not mucosal. sent9: there exists something such that it is an immune. sent10: the thermistor is a kind of non-meaty thing that is a molter. sent11: if something is non-mucosal a molter then it is untheatrical. sent12: that everything is not an odometer hold. sent13: the thermistor is a kind of a molter if something is not immune. sent14: the thermistor is both not a Stravinsky and unreceptive. sent15: the thermistor is a molter. sent16: if there are non-immune things the thermistor is a kind of non-mucosal a molter. sent17: if that the diffraction is a despondency and does overpay does not hold then the thermistor is not a hemiparasite. sent18: the diffraction is not mucosal if the fact that the levator is an immune is correct. sent19: there is something such that it is not an immune. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: that the diffraction is a despondency and does overpay does not hold.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the thermistor is not a kind of a hemiparasite.; sent11 -> int3: if the thermistor is non-mucosal thing that is a kind of a molter it is untheatrical.; sent19 & sent16 -> int4: the thermistor is not mucosal but it is a molter.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the thermistor is untheatrical hold.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__