the fact that something is not maritime but a melanin is false.
sent1: the mantelet finedraws joinery. sent2: if something is not nonsuppurative then it is not maritime. sent3: if the mantelet is an adrenal then that it is a kind of a fish and is not maritime is not correct. sent4: the mantelet unites. sent5: the mantelet is not a company if the fact that it does lurch and is not a soymilk is not correct. sent6: the fact that the mantelet is nonsuppurative and is not a kind of a claim does not hold if the fact that it finedraws joinery is not incorrect. sent7: The joinery finedraws mantelet. sent8: there exists something such that that it is a melanin is not wrong. sent9: if that the maypop is a kind of a perfluorocarbon that is not pyretic is wrong it does not brief large. sent10: if the fact that something is nonsuppurative but it is not a claim is incorrect it is not maritime. sent11: the wassailer is not a kind of a coupling. sent12: there exists something such that it is not maritime. sent13: the mantelet is a coupling and it does unite if it is not a surpliced. sent14: the nostoc is not a claim. sent15: the mantelet is not maritime if it is not nonsuppurative. sent16: the mantelet is not a coupling. sent17: the mantelet is a melanin that unites if it is not a kind of a coupling. sent18: if something is not maritime it is a Netherlander and is a clearing. sent19: the fipple is nonsuppurative. sent20: there exists something such that it is maritime and a melanin. sent21: if the mantelet is not a kind of a coupling it does unite. sent22: the bittersweet is better and finedraws joinery. sent23: the mantelet is non-sustentacular. sent24: that the weathervane does unite is not correct. sent25: if the fact that the mantelet is a kind of a perfluorocarbon and is not nonsuppurative is wrong then that it is not congenial is not false.
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: that the mantelet is both nonsuppurative and not a claim does not hold.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the mantelet is not maritime if the fact that that the mantelet is nonsuppurative but it does not claim is right is incorrect hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mantelet is not maritime.; sent17 & sent16 -> int4: the mantelet is a melanin and it does unite.; int4 -> int5: the mantelet is a melanin.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the mantelet is non-maritime thing that is a melanin is true.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the di-iodotyrosine is a melanin.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is not maritime but a melanin is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the mantelet finedraws joinery. sent2: if something is not nonsuppurative then it is not maritime. sent3: if the mantelet is an adrenal then that it is a kind of a fish and is not maritime is not correct. sent4: the mantelet unites. sent5: the mantelet is not a company if the fact that it does lurch and is not a soymilk is not correct. sent6: the fact that the mantelet is nonsuppurative and is not a kind of a claim does not hold if the fact that it finedraws joinery is not incorrect. sent7: The joinery finedraws mantelet. sent8: there exists something such that that it is a melanin is not wrong. sent9: if that the maypop is a kind of a perfluorocarbon that is not pyretic is wrong it does not brief large. sent10: if the fact that something is nonsuppurative but it is not a claim is incorrect it is not maritime. sent11: the wassailer is not a kind of a coupling. sent12: there exists something such that it is not maritime. sent13: the mantelet is a coupling and it does unite if it is not a surpliced. sent14: the nostoc is not a claim. sent15: the mantelet is not maritime if it is not nonsuppurative. sent16: the mantelet is not a coupling. sent17: the mantelet is a melanin that unites if it is not a kind of a coupling. sent18: if something is not maritime it is a Netherlander and is a clearing. sent19: the fipple is nonsuppurative. sent20: there exists something such that it is maritime and a melanin. sent21: if the mantelet is not a kind of a coupling it does unite. sent22: the bittersweet is better and finedraws joinery. sent23: the mantelet is non-sustentacular. sent24: that the weathervane does unite is not correct. sent25: if the fact that the mantelet is a kind of a perfluorocarbon and is not nonsuppurative is wrong then that it is not congenial is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: that the mantelet is both nonsuppurative and not a claim does not hold.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the mantelet is not maritime if the fact that that the mantelet is nonsuppurative but it does not claim is right is incorrect hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mantelet is not maritime.; sent17 & sent16 -> int4: the mantelet is a melanin and it does unite.; int4 -> int5: the mantelet is a melanin.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the mantelet is non-maritime thing that is a melanin is true.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__