the fact that the ancestress hiccups is correct.
sent1: the fact that the Pablum is a platyrrhine that is not Socratic is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a platyrrhine. sent2: if the ancestress is monocarpic a citrate then it does not hiccup. sent3: something is a kind of non-weedy thing that does not gather if it is not christian. sent4: if something is not Socratic the fact that it is not a platyrrhine and it does hiccup is not right. sent5: if the fact that the tofu is a Bruneian and does not defuse appreciator is false then the spinel is not Socratic. sent6: the spinel is monocarpic. sent7: if something is a Bruneian it is not a kind of a platyrrhine. sent8: the tofu does not recast songstress if the fact that the spinel does not recast tofu but it does recast Malthusian does not hold. sent9: that the ancestress is monocarpic is not false. sent10: The songstress does recast tofu. sent11: the fact that the spinel does not recast tofu and recasts Malthusian is not correct if the ancestress is not a kind of a citrate. sent12: the tofu does not recast songstress if the spinel does not recast Malthusian. sent13: something is monocarpic if that it is not non-platyrrhine but non-Socratic does not hold. sent14: if the tofu is monocarpic then the spinel is a kind of a citrate and/or it does not recast songstress. sent15: the tofu does recast songstress. sent16: that the wardroom is sinkable and it tags ecologist is incorrect. sent17: if the backstroker is not christian and it does not defuse Aulostomus the fact that the ecologist is not christian is not wrong. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Edwardian the appreciator is a Bruneian and it does defuse appreciator. sent19: the spinel does not recast songstress. sent20: if the ecologist is not weedy and it is not a gather then the fact that it is Edwardian hold. sent21: if the fact that the spinel does not recast songstress and is a citrate does not hold then the fact that the ancestress does not recast Malthusian is correct. sent22: if something is unsinkable it is unchristian thing that does not defuse Aulostomus. sent23: the ancestress is a hiccup if the spinel is a kind of a citrate. sent24: the backstroker is not sinkable if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of sinkable thing that tags ecologist is incorrect. sent25: that something does not recast songstress but it is a citrate is incorrect if it is not monocarpic. sent26: if the Pablum is monocarpic then the fact that the tofu is monocarpic is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ancestress is not a kind of a citrate.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the spinel does not recast tofu but it does recast Malthusian does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the tofu does not recast songstress.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ancestress is a citrate.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the ancestress is monocarpic and it does citrate.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the ancestress does not recast Malthusian.
sent25 -> int6: that if the spinel is not monocarpic the fact that the spinel does not recast songstress but it is a citrate is wrong is right.; sent4 -> int7: if the spinel is not Socratic that it is both not a platyrrhine and a hiccup is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ancestress hiccups is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Pablum is a platyrrhine that is not Socratic is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a platyrrhine. sent2: if the ancestress is monocarpic a citrate then it does not hiccup. sent3: something is a kind of non-weedy thing that does not gather if it is not christian. sent4: if something is not Socratic the fact that it is not a platyrrhine and it does hiccup is not right. sent5: if the fact that the tofu is a Bruneian and does not defuse appreciator is false then the spinel is not Socratic. sent6: the spinel is monocarpic. sent7: if something is a Bruneian it is not a kind of a platyrrhine. sent8: the tofu does not recast songstress if the fact that the spinel does not recast tofu but it does recast Malthusian does not hold. sent9: that the ancestress is monocarpic is not false. sent10: The songstress does recast tofu. sent11: the fact that the spinel does not recast tofu and recasts Malthusian is not correct if the ancestress is not a kind of a citrate. sent12: the tofu does not recast songstress if the spinel does not recast Malthusian. sent13: something is monocarpic if that it is not non-platyrrhine but non-Socratic does not hold. sent14: if the tofu is monocarpic then the spinel is a kind of a citrate and/or it does not recast songstress. sent15: the tofu does recast songstress. sent16: that the wardroom is sinkable and it tags ecologist is incorrect. sent17: if the backstroker is not christian and it does not defuse Aulostomus the fact that the ecologist is not christian is not wrong. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Edwardian the appreciator is a Bruneian and it does defuse appreciator. sent19: the spinel does not recast songstress. sent20: if the ecologist is not weedy and it is not a gather then the fact that it is Edwardian hold. sent21: if the fact that the spinel does not recast songstress and is a citrate does not hold then the fact that the ancestress does not recast Malthusian is correct. sent22: if something is unsinkable it is unchristian thing that does not defuse Aulostomus. sent23: the ancestress is a hiccup if the spinel is a kind of a citrate. sent24: the backstroker is not sinkable if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of sinkable thing that tags ecologist is incorrect. sent25: that something does not recast songstress but it is a citrate is incorrect if it is not monocarpic. sent26: if the Pablum is monocarpic then the fact that the tofu is monocarpic is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ancestress is not a kind of a citrate.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the spinel does not recast tofu but it does recast Malthusian does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the tofu does not recast songstress.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ancestress is a citrate.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the ancestress is monocarpic and it does citrate.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__