there is something such that it is not an eyeball and resects prion.
sent1: that the fact that the vizier is non-Voltarian a utilization is false is right. sent2: there is something such that it resects prion. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is not Voltarian and is not a kind of a utilization does not hold the adoptee is a kind of a surffish. sent4: that the vizier is Voltarian and is not a utilization is false. sent5: if the adoptee is a heave then the fact that the Simoniz is not a Duralumin and not a heave is not right. sent6: there exists something such that that it is both not a giant and an atonement does not hold. sent7: the attack is not an eyeball but it resects prion if the vizier is an eyeball. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is a Wollstonecraft that is an orient is incorrect the Simoniz does cling agility. sent9: if there is something such that it does not orient then the Simoniz clings agility. sent10: that the vizier is both not a utilization and a heave is not right. sent11: something does not cling agility if the fact that it is not a Duralumin and it is not a kind of a heave is not true. sent12: if something is a heave then it does not cling agility. sent13: the fact that the epistle is a Wollstonecraft that does orient is not right. sent14: the attack is not an eyeball if the vizier is a kind of an eyeball. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is Voltarian and not a utilization is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the Simoniz is not a Duralumin but it is a kind of a heave does not hold if the adoptee is a heave. sent17: if something is a kind of a surffish then it does heave.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the vizier is both non-Voltarian and not a utilization is true is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not Voltarian and is not a utilization is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the adoptee is a surffish.; sent17 -> int3: if the adoptee is a surffish then it heaves.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the adoptee heaves.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the Simoniz is not a Duralumin and it is not a heave is not wrong is wrong.; sent11 -> int6: if that the Simoniz is not a Duralumin and it is not a heave is wrong then it does not cling agility.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Simoniz does not cling agility.; sent13 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a Wollstonecraft and it is an orient is not true.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the Simoniz does cling agility.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the vizier is non-Voltarian and it is not a utilization.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not an eyeball and resects prion. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the vizier is non-Voltarian a utilization is false is right. sent2: there is something such that it resects prion. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is not Voltarian and is not a kind of a utilization does not hold the adoptee is a kind of a surffish. sent4: that the vizier is Voltarian and is not a utilization is false. sent5: if the adoptee is a heave then the fact that the Simoniz is not a Duralumin and not a heave is not right. sent6: there exists something such that that it is both not a giant and an atonement does not hold. sent7: the attack is not an eyeball but it resects prion if the vizier is an eyeball. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is a Wollstonecraft that is an orient is incorrect the Simoniz does cling agility. sent9: if there is something such that it does not orient then the Simoniz clings agility. sent10: that the vizier is both not a utilization and a heave is not right. sent11: something does not cling agility if the fact that it is not a Duralumin and it is not a kind of a heave is not true. sent12: if something is a heave then it does not cling agility. sent13: the fact that the epistle is a Wollstonecraft that does orient is not right. sent14: the attack is not an eyeball if the vizier is a kind of an eyeball. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is Voltarian and not a utilization is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the Simoniz is not a Duralumin but it is a kind of a heave does not hold if the adoptee is a heave. sent17: if something is a kind of a surffish then it does heave. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the vizier is both non-Voltarian and not a utilization is true is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not Voltarian and is not a utilization is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the adoptee is a surffish.; sent17 -> int3: if the adoptee is a surffish then it heaves.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the adoptee heaves.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the Simoniz is not a Duralumin and it is not a heave is not wrong is wrong.; sent11 -> int6: if that the Simoniz is not a Duralumin and it is not a heave is wrong then it does not cling agility.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Simoniz does not cling agility.; sent13 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a Wollstonecraft and it is an orient is not true.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the Simoniz does cling agility.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the vizier is non-Voltarian and it is not a utilization.; __UNKNOWN__