the syncarp does color.
sent1: if the syncarp dims enalapril and it is lovable then the teff is not nautical. sent2: the syncarp is a midland. sent3: the Kamia is not unlucky. sent4: the syncarp is a default. sent5: the Kamia is both not a colored and not a dimness if it is a Evangelist. sent6: something that is not unlucky is both a Evangelist and Aleutian. sent7: something does color but it is not a dimness if it does not dim enalapril. sent8: the fact that the teff is not bacteriolytic or it does not default or both is incorrect. sent9: something is a dimness and is not nautical if it is not a midland. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not nautical that the teff is not lovable and dims enalapril is wrong. sent11: the bladderwort is nautical. sent12: the fact that the teff is not a kind of a vice-presidency or it is not nautical or both is not correct if it is a kind of a pining. sent13: the fact that the syncarp does not default and/or it does not dim Alcedinidae is wrong if it is a midland. sent14: if that something either does default or does not dim Alcedinidae or both is not correct it is lovable. sent15: if that the teff is not lovable but it does dim enalapril is not true the bladderwort dim enalapril. sent16: the coffeecake is a kind of lovable thing that is avirulent. sent17: the syncarp does default if that it is a kind of a midland hold. sent18: if the bladderwort is nautical then the teff is nautical. sent19: the syncarp dims enalapril or it is lovable or both if it is not nautical. sent20: if something is not a colored and not a dimness it is not nautical.
sent13 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that either the syncarp is not a default or it does not dim Alcedinidae or both does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the syncarp dims enalapril.; sent18 & sent11 -> int2: the teff is nautical.; sent7 -> int3: the syncarp is colored but not a dimness if it does not dim enalapril.;
the bladderwort is a kind of a midland.
sent20 -> int4: if the Kamia is a kind of non-colored thing that is not a dimness it is not nautical.; sent6 -> int5: the Kamia is a Evangelist and it is Aleutian if it is lucky.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the Kamia is a kind of a Evangelist that is Aleutian.; int6 -> int7: the Kamia is a Evangelist.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the Kamia is not a colored and is not a dimness.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the Kamia is not nautical.; int9 -> int10: there are non-nautical things.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: that the teff is non-lovable thing that does dim enalapril is not correct.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the bladderwort does dim enalapril is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the syncarp does color. ; $context$ = sent1: if the syncarp dims enalapril and it is lovable then the teff is not nautical. sent2: the syncarp is a midland. sent3: the Kamia is not unlucky. sent4: the syncarp is a default. sent5: the Kamia is both not a colored and not a dimness if it is a Evangelist. sent6: something that is not unlucky is both a Evangelist and Aleutian. sent7: something does color but it is not a dimness if it does not dim enalapril. sent8: the fact that the teff is not bacteriolytic or it does not default or both is incorrect. sent9: something is a dimness and is not nautical if it is not a midland. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not nautical that the teff is not lovable and dims enalapril is wrong. sent11: the bladderwort is nautical. sent12: the fact that the teff is not a kind of a vice-presidency or it is not nautical or both is not correct if it is a kind of a pining. sent13: the fact that the syncarp does not default and/or it does not dim Alcedinidae is wrong if it is a midland. sent14: if that something either does default or does not dim Alcedinidae or both is not correct it is lovable. sent15: if that the teff is not lovable but it does dim enalapril is not true the bladderwort dim enalapril. sent16: the coffeecake is a kind of lovable thing that is avirulent. sent17: the syncarp does default if that it is a kind of a midland hold. sent18: if the bladderwort is nautical then the teff is nautical. sent19: the syncarp dims enalapril or it is lovable or both if it is not nautical. sent20: if something is not a colored and not a dimness it is not nautical. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that either the syncarp is not a default or it does not dim Alcedinidae or both does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the syncarp dims enalapril.; sent18 & sent11 -> int2: the teff is nautical.; sent7 -> int3: the syncarp is colored but not a dimness if it does not dim enalapril.; __UNKNOWN__