the recapitulation is a Isabella.
sent1: there is something such that that it does mean Adelaide and/or it is not a Jeffersonian does not hold. sent2: if something does not gong freshness and it is not a kind of a surrey then it is not eutrophic. sent3: that everything is not unsexy is right. sent4: the tolazamide is not a iridoncus. sent5: if something is sarcolemmic then the fact that it is not a Isabella and is unsexy is false. sent6: everything does not pole tolazamide. sent7: if the fact that something is not a Isabella but unsexy is not correct then it is not paramedical. sent8: if the breadroot is not unsexy then it is not a silverspot. sent9: if the recapitulation is not eutrophic then the heir-at-law is sarcolemmic a abstractionism. sent10: that the breadroot is not unsexy is right if there is something such that that it is altricial or it is not a Isabella or both is false. sent11: the fact that something is a kind of a silverspot and/or is not altricial is incorrect if it is not unsexy. sent12: the recapitulation is not a Isabella if there exists something such that that it is a silverspot and/or it is not altricial is incorrect. sent13: something does not gong ethnarch.
sent11 -> int1: if the breadroot is not unsexy then that it is a silverspot and/or not altricial is not right.; sent3 -> int2: the breadroot is not unsexy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the breadroot is a silverspot and/or it is not altricial is false.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a silverspot or it is not altricial or both is not true.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the heir-at-law is not paramedical.
sent7 -> int5: that the heir-at-law is not paramedical is not wrong if the fact that it is not a Isabella and it is unsexy is not true.; sent5 -> int6: the fact that the heir-at-law is not a kind of a Isabella and is unsexy is not correct if it is sarcolemmic.; sent2 -> int7: if the recapitulation does not gong freshness and is not a surrey then it is not eutrophic.;
$hypothesis$ = the recapitulation is a Isabella. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it does mean Adelaide and/or it is not a Jeffersonian does not hold. sent2: if something does not gong freshness and it is not a kind of a surrey then it is not eutrophic. sent3: that everything is not unsexy is right. sent4: the tolazamide is not a iridoncus. sent5: if something is sarcolemmic then the fact that it is not a Isabella and is unsexy is false. sent6: everything does not pole tolazamide. sent7: if the fact that something is not a Isabella but unsexy is not correct then it is not paramedical. sent8: if the breadroot is not unsexy then it is not a silverspot. sent9: if the recapitulation is not eutrophic then the heir-at-law is sarcolemmic a abstractionism. sent10: that the breadroot is not unsexy is right if there is something such that that it is altricial or it is not a Isabella or both is false. sent11: the fact that something is a kind of a silverspot and/or is not altricial is incorrect if it is not unsexy. sent12: the recapitulation is not a Isabella if there exists something such that that it is a silverspot and/or it is not altricial is incorrect. sent13: something does not gong ethnarch. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the breadroot is not unsexy then that it is a silverspot and/or not altricial is not right.; sent3 -> int2: the breadroot is not unsexy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the breadroot is a silverspot and/or it is not altricial is false.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a silverspot or it is not altricial or both is not true.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__