not the legitimation but the onomatopoeicness happens.
sent1: if the tillage happens and/or the startling visualizer does not occur the startling visualizer does not occur. sent2: the calcanealness occurs. sent3: if the nonmagneticness happens then that the onomatopoeicness occurs is correct. sent4: the fact that the updating skua occurs and the winding ready-to-wear occurs if the cyber-terrorism does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the unreproducibleness occurs and the temperance does not occur is wrong if the crest occurs. sent6: the fact that the winding Permalloy and the non-Iranianness occurs is not true. sent7: the crest occurs if that the fact that the crest does not occur and the Australianness occurs is false hold. sent8: if that the unreproducibleness but not the temperance occurs does not hold then the doubt does not occur. sent9: if the winding ready-to-wear does not occur that the dropkicking knout but not the suffocation happens hold. sent10: that the doubting does not occur triggers that the cyber-terrorism does not occur and the legitimation occurs. sent11: the cyber-terrorism happens. sent12: the legitimation does not occur if the chorionicness and the cyber-terrorism occurs. sent13: that that the non-calcanealness or the non-nonmagneticness or both happens does not hold hold if the startling visualizer does not occur. sent14: that the nonmagneticness happens is true. sent15: the fact that the fact that not the cresting but the Australian happens is incorrect is correct if the nuclearness does not occur. sent16: that the fact that the dropkicking knout but not the suffocation occurs does not hold hold if the calcanealness happens. sent17: if the fact that the onomatopoeicness does not occur is right the expensiveness does not occur but the chorionicness happens. sent18: that the winding ready-to-wear occurs brings about that the chorionicness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the winding ready-to-wear does not occur is correct.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the dropkicking knout occurs but the suffocation does not occur.; sent16 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the dropkicking knout but not the suffocation happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the winding ready-to-wear occurs.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the chorionicness occurs.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: both the chorionicness and the cyber-terrorism occurs.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the legitimation does not occur.; sent3 & sent14 -> int8: the onomatopoeicness happens.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that that not the legitimation but the onomatopoeicness happens does not hold is correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = not the legitimation but the onomatopoeicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tillage happens and/or the startling visualizer does not occur the startling visualizer does not occur. sent2: the calcanealness occurs. sent3: if the nonmagneticness happens then that the onomatopoeicness occurs is correct. sent4: the fact that the updating skua occurs and the winding ready-to-wear occurs if the cyber-terrorism does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the unreproducibleness occurs and the temperance does not occur is wrong if the crest occurs. sent6: the fact that the winding Permalloy and the non-Iranianness occurs is not true. sent7: the crest occurs if that the fact that the crest does not occur and the Australianness occurs is false hold. sent8: if that the unreproducibleness but not the temperance occurs does not hold then the doubt does not occur. sent9: if the winding ready-to-wear does not occur that the dropkicking knout but not the suffocation happens hold. sent10: that the doubting does not occur triggers that the cyber-terrorism does not occur and the legitimation occurs. sent11: the cyber-terrorism happens. sent12: the legitimation does not occur if the chorionicness and the cyber-terrorism occurs. sent13: that that the non-calcanealness or the non-nonmagneticness or both happens does not hold hold if the startling visualizer does not occur. sent14: that the nonmagneticness happens is true. sent15: the fact that the fact that not the cresting but the Australian happens is incorrect is correct if the nuclearness does not occur. sent16: that the fact that the dropkicking knout but not the suffocation occurs does not hold hold if the calcanealness happens. sent17: if the fact that the onomatopoeicness does not occur is right the expensiveness does not occur but the chorionicness happens. sent18: that the winding ready-to-wear occurs brings about that the chorionicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the winding ready-to-wear does not occur is correct.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the dropkicking knout occurs but the suffocation does not occur.; sent16 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the dropkicking knout but not the suffocation happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the winding ready-to-wear occurs.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the chorionicness occurs.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: both the chorionicness and the cyber-terrorism occurs.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the legitimation does not occur.; sent3 & sent14 -> int8: the onomatopoeicness happens.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__