the nonexploratoryness and the fabricating positivism occurs.
sent1: if either the broiling farrow does not occur or the drug does not occur or both then the fact that the broiling farrow does not occur hold. sent2: the drugging occurs. sent3: the broiling farrow occurs. sent4: both the fabricating positivism and the drug occurs. sent5: if the gala does not occur the fact that both the non-exploratoriness and the fabricating positivism occurs is incorrect. sent6: that not the downturn but the exploratoriness happens is false. sent7: the fact that the gala occurs hold.
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the gala occurs and the broiling farrow happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the exploratoriness happens hold.; sent4 -> int2: the fabricating positivism happens.;
that both the non-exploratoriness and the fabricating positivism happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the nonexploratoryness and the fabricating positivism occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if either the broiling farrow does not occur or the drug does not occur or both then the fact that the broiling farrow does not occur hold. sent2: the drugging occurs. sent3: the broiling farrow occurs. sent4: both the fabricating positivism and the drug occurs. sent5: if the gala does not occur the fact that both the non-exploratoriness and the fabricating positivism occurs is incorrect. sent6: that not the downturn but the exploratoriness happens is false. sent7: the fact that the gala occurs hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the gala occurs and the broiling farrow happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the exploratoriness happens hold.; sent4 -> int2: the fabricating positivism happens.; __UNKNOWN__