the fact that there exists something such that if that it is trabecular and it is echoic is false then it does not incriminate Balaenicipitidae is not right.
sent1: if something is non-trabecular then it does not incriminate Balaenicipitidae. sent2: something does not incriminate Balaenicipitidae if the fact that it is not non-trabecular but echoic is false. sent3: the somewhere is dried if that it mounts and it does chance setup is incorrect. sent4: that there is something such that if that it is a kind of an apparatus and is a enfranchisement is not right then it is not a kind of a palanquin is right. sent5: if the fact that something is advective and incriminates Karok is wrong then it is not civil.
sent2 -> int1: the somewhere does not incriminate Balaenicipitidae if the fact that it is trabecular thing that is echoic does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the suet is not civil if that it is advective and incriminates Karok is not true.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it is trabecular and it is echoic is false then it does not incriminate Balaenicipitidae is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is non-trabecular then it does not incriminate Balaenicipitidae. sent2: something does not incriminate Balaenicipitidae if the fact that it is not non-trabecular but echoic is false. sent3: the somewhere is dried if that it mounts and it does chance setup is incorrect. sent4: that there is something such that if that it is a kind of an apparatus and is a enfranchisement is not right then it is not a kind of a palanquin is right. sent5: if the fact that something is advective and incriminates Karok is wrong then it is not civil. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the somewhere does not incriminate Balaenicipitidae if the fact that it is trabecular thing that is echoic does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__