the germination doubles and is not untruthful.
sent1: if the germination is vocalic the wally is not a kind of a double. sent2: the wally is not a letterman and not vocalic if the fructification is a drainboard. sent3: if there is something such that that it does not butt void and it is nonspherical is not right the void is not inculpatory. sent4: if the fact that the void is not a letterman is true the fact that the fructification is non-vocalic thing that is inculpatory is incorrect. sent5: if the germination is not a letterman then the spendthrift is untruthful. sent6: the spendthrift is a kind of a letterman if the wally is not vocalic. sent7: the spendthrift is not a kind of a neoliberalism. sent8: the germination is not a neoliberalism. sent9: if the fructification is inculpatory the void is not a letterman and it is not a kind of a drainboard. sent10: the NAD does not negotiate if the motherwort is a neoliberalism. sent11: there is something such that that it does not butt void and it is nonspherical is incorrect. sent12: the germination is nonspherical. sent13: if the fact that the NAD is a kind of a neoliberalism and is not a kind of a letterman is not correct the fact that the motherwort negotiates is not false. sent14: the glyceraldehyde is a kind of an endocrine. sent15: the glyceraldehyde is dermal if the motherwort does negotiate. sent16: the spendthrift is dermal. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it does not negotiate and it is a neoliberalism is incorrect then the NAD is truthful. sent18: that the germination doubles and is not untruthful is not false if that the glyceraldehyde is dermal hold. sent19: that the NAD is a neoliberalism but it is not a kind of a letterman is not true if the spendthrift is a letterman. sent20: if the NAD is a letterman but it is not dermal then the glyceraldehyde is inculpatory. sent21: the germination is not dermal. sent22: the fructification is vocalic if the wally is not a drainboard and it does not negotiate. sent23: something is a kind of non-inculpatory thing that rears motherwort. sent24: the glyceraldehyde is not a drainboard. sent25: if that the NAD is vocalic is not wrong then the wally is a letterman. sent26: that the NAD is a neoliberalism but it does not rear motherwort is incorrect. sent27: if the wally is vocalic then the fructification does not rear motherwort and it is not a drainboard.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wally is vocalic.; sent27 & assump1 -> int1: the fructification does not rear motherwort and is not a drainboard.; sent11 & sent3 -> int2: the void is non-inculpatory.;
the fact that the germination is a double that is not untruthful is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the germination doubles and is not untruthful. ; $context$ = sent1: if the germination is vocalic the wally is not a kind of a double. sent2: the wally is not a letterman and not vocalic if the fructification is a drainboard. sent3: if there is something such that that it does not butt void and it is nonspherical is not right the void is not inculpatory. sent4: if the fact that the void is not a letterman is true the fact that the fructification is non-vocalic thing that is inculpatory is incorrect. sent5: if the germination is not a letterman then the spendthrift is untruthful. sent6: the spendthrift is a kind of a letterman if the wally is not vocalic. sent7: the spendthrift is not a kind of a neoliberalism. sent8: the germination is not a neoliberalism. sent9: if the fructification is inculpatory the void is not a letterman and it is not a kind of a drainboard. sent10: the NAD does not negotiate if the motherwort is a neoliberalism. sent11: there is something such that that it does not butt void and it is nonspherical is incorrect. sent12: the germination is nonspherical. sent13: if the fact that the NAD is a kind of a neoliberalism and is not a kind of a letterman is not correct the fact that the motherwort negotiates is not false. sent14: the glyceraldehyde is a kind of an endocrine. sent15: the glyceraldehyde is dermal if the motherwort does negotiate. sent16: the spendthrift is dermal. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it does not negotiate and it is a neoliberalism is incorrect then the NAD is truthful. sent18: that the germination doubles and is not untruthful is not false if that the glyceraldehyde is dermal hold. sent19: that the NAD is a neoliberalism but it is not a kind of a letterman is not true if the spendthrift is a letterman. sent20: if the NAD is a letterman but it is not dermal then the glyceraldehyde is inculpatory. sent21: the germination is not dermal. sent22: the fructification is vocalic if the wally is not a drainboard and it does not negotiate. sent23: something is a kind of non-inculpatory thing that rears motherwort. sent24: the glyceraldehyde is not a drainboard. sent25: if that the NAD is vocalic is not wrong then the wally is a letterman. sent26: that the NAD is a neoliberalism but it does not rear motherwort is incorrect. sent27: if the wally is vocalic then the fructification does not rear motherwort and it is not a drainboard. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wally is vocalic.; sent27 & assump1 -> int1: the fructification does not rear motherwort and is not a drainboard.; sent11 & sent3 -> int2: the void is non-inculpatory.; __UNKNOWN__