that the tapster is gyroscopic is right.
sent1: there exists something such that it does not disperse. sent2: if the buddleia does not disperse then it is a leadwort. sent3: if that the buddleia is a kind of a leadwort is right the tapster is gyroscopic. sent4: that the lunch mulcts productiveness is not wrong. sent5: the lunch is a Dalian. sent6: if the pulley is monistic the electrolytic is monistic. sent7: the doorlock does not houseclean. sent8: the buddleia is a leadwort if that it does disperse and does not rev is incorrect. sent9: if that the buddleia is a kind of a leadwort and does not houseclean is not right it does disperse. sent10: the lunch is a kind of a Dalian if it housecleans. sent11: the tapster does rev. sent12: the lunch is catarrhal and does mulct productiveness. sent13: the buddleia is a leadwort if that it does houseclean and it is not monistic does not hold. sent14: if the electrolytic is not a kind of a retriever then the fact that the lunch is catarrhal but it does not houseclean does not hold. sent15: if the electrolytic is monistic the fact that the buddleia does not houseclean and is a Dalian is not true. sent16: if that something does not mulct productiveness but it is catarrhal does not hold then it is not gyroscopic. sent17: that the lunch is not catarrhal hold if the fact that the visitor is catarrhal and mulcts productiveness is false. sent18: if the fact that something does not houseclean but it is a kind of a Dalian does not hold it houseclean. sent19: the electrolytic is catarrhal. sent20: if the fact that the buddleia does houseclean hold the visitor does not houseclean. sent21: the electrolytic is not a kind of a retriever. sent22: if that the lunch housecleans is not incorrect it is not monistic and is a kind of a Dalian. sent23: the tapster does houseclean. sent24: the fact that the visitor does not disperse is correct if the lunch is not monistic but it is a kind of a Dalian. sent25: that the buddleia does disperse but it does not houseclean is not true. sent26: the electrolytic housecleans.
sent12 -> int1: the lunch is catarrhal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lunch does not houseclean.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lunch is catarrhal but it does not houseclean.; sent14 & sent21 -> int3: the fact that the lunch is catarrhal thing that does not houseclean is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the lunch does houseclean.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: the lunch is a kind of non-monistic thing that is a Dalian.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: the visitor does not disperse.;
the tapster is not gyroscopic.
sent18 -> int8: the buddleia does houseclean if that it does not houseclean and it is a Dalian does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the tapster is gyroscopic is right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does not disperse. sent2: if the buddleia does not disperse then it is a leadwort. sent3: if that the buddleia is a kind of a leadwort is right the tapster is gyroscopic. sent4: that the lunch mulcts productiveness is not wrong. sent5: the lunch is a Dalian. sent6: if the pulley is monistic the electrolytic is monistic. sent7: the doorlock does not houseclean. sent8: the buddleia is a leadwort if that it does disperse and does not rev is incorrect. sent9: if that the buddleia is a kind of a leadwort and does not houseclean is not right it does disperse. sent10: the lunch is a kind of a Dalian if it housecleans. sent11: the tapster does rev. sent12: the lunch is catarrhal and does mulct productiveness. sent13: the buddleia is a leadwort if that it does houseclean and it is not monistic does not hold. sent14: if the electrolytic is not a kind of a retriever then the fact that the lunch is catarrhal but it does not houseclean does not hold. sent15: if the electrolytic is monistic the fact that the buddleia does not houseclean and is a Dalian is not true. sent16: if that something does not mulct productiveness but it is catarrhal does not hold then it is not gyroscopic. sent17: that the lunch is not catarrhal hold if the fact that the visitor is catarrhal and mulcts productiveness is false. sent18: if the fact that something does not houseclean but it is a kind of a Dalian does not hold it houseclean. sent19: the electrolytic is catarrhal. sent20: if the fact that the buddleia does houseclean hold the visitor does not houseclean. sent21: the electrolytic is not a kind of a retriever. sent22: if that the lunch housecleans is not incorrect it is not monistic and is a kind of a Dalian. sent23: the tapster does houseclean. sent24: the fact that the visitor does not disperse is correct if the lunch is not monistic but it is a kind of a Dalian. sent25: that the buddleia does disperse but it does not houseclean is not true. sent26: the electrolytic housecleans. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the lunch is catarrhal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lunch does not houseclean.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lunch is catarrhal but it does not houseclean.; sent14 & sent21 -> int3: the fact that the lunch is catarrhal thing that does not houseclean is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the lunch does houseclean.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: the lunch is a kind of non-monistic thing that is a Dalian.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: the visitor does not disperse.; __UNKNOWN__