that the Gruyere degrades but it does not snuffle Unio is wrong.
sent1: the countercurrent is a kind of a grass but it is not mini. sent2: that the marsupium is a kind of a seaborgium and it does tool Ictiobus is incorrect. sent3: that the Gruyere degrades and it snuffles Unio does not hold. sent4: the fact that the subdivider is a seaborgium is true if it is a kind of non-Old thing that snuffles Guayaquil. sent5: the subdivider does not tool Ictiobus if there exists something such that it is not an aloofness. sent6: the weekly does not snuffle Guayaquil if something that grasses is not mini. sent7: if that the subdivider is allometric is not false it is biologistic. sent8: if the marsupium is mini then it is a grass. sent9: the subdivider is not Old and does snuffle Guayaquil if that the marsupium grasses is right. sent10: the subdivider is non-Old. sent11: something tools Ictiobus and is not Old. sent12: the marsupium is mini. sent13: the kumquat is not a kind of an aloofness. sent14: if that the subdivider does not degrade is right the fact that the Gruyere degrade but it does not snuffle Unio is false. sent15: there is something such that it grasses. sent16: if the marsupium does degrade and it does tool Ictiobus that the weekly does not snuffle Guayaquil is not wrong. sent17: something is allometric if it is biologistic. sent18: if the weekly is not allometric the fact that the subdivider is allometric and it is an aloofness is not true. sent19: that the marsupium is not a seaborgium and tools Ictiobus does not hold if the kumquat does not tools Ictiobus. sent20: the subdivider is allometric. sent21: the weekly is not a kind of an aloofness if the marsupium is a kind of a seaborgium. sent22: the weekly is not mini. sent23: if that the marsupium is not a kind of a seaborgium and does tool Ictiobus is wrong the weekly is not an aloofness. sent24: the fact that the weekly does not degrade but it does snuffle Guayaquil is not right if the Gruyere does not snuffle Guayaquil. sent25: the weekly is both an aloofness and Old if it does not snuffle Guayaquil.
sent7 & sent20 -> int1: the subdivider is biologistic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subdivider does degrade.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the subdivider is biologistic and degrades.; sent1 -> int3: something is a grass but not mini.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the weekly does not snuffle Guayaquil.; sent25 & int4 -> int5: the weekly is an aloofness that is Old.; int5 -> int6: the weekly is a kind of an aloofness.;
the Gruyere degrades and does not snuffle Unio.
sent17 -> int7: the Gruyere is allometric if it is not non-biologistic.; sent8 & sent12 -> int8: the fact that the marsupium is a grass hold.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the subdivider is not Old and snuffles Guayaquil.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the subdivider is a seaborgium.; sent13 -> int11: something is not an aloofness.; int11 & sent5 -> int12: the subdivider does not tool Ictiobus.; int10 & int12 -> int13: that the subdivider is a kind of a seaborgium but it does not tool Ictiobus is not wrong.; int13 -> int14: something is a kind of a seaborgium and does not tool Ictiobus.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Gruyere degrades but it does not snuffle Unio is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the countercurrent is a kind of a grass but it is not mini. sent2: that the marsupium is a kind of a seaborgium and it does tool Ictiobus is incorrect. sent3: that the Gruyere degrades and it snuffles Unio does not hold. sent4: the fact that the subdivider is a seaborgium is true if it is a kind of non-Old thing that snuffles Guayaquil. sent5: the subdivider does not tool Ictiobus if there exists something such that it is not an aloofness. sent6: the weekly does not snuffle Guayaquil if something that grasses is not mini. sent7: if that the subdivider is allometric is not false it is biologistic. sent8: if the marsupium is mini then it is a grass. sent9: the subdivider is not Old and does snuffle Guayaquil if that the marsupium grasses is right. sent10: the subdivider is non-Old. sent11: something tools Ictiobus and is not Old. sent12: the marsupium is mini. sent13: the kumquat is not a kind of an aloofness. sent14: if that the subdivider does not degrade is right the fact that the Gruyere degrade but it does not snuffle Unio is false. sent15: there is something such that it grasses. sent16: if the marsupium does degrade and it does tool Ictiobus that the weekly does not snuffle Guayaquil is not wrong. sent17: something is allometric if it is biologistic. sent18: if the weekly is not allometric the fact that the subdivider is allometric and it is an aloofness is not true. sent19: that the marsupium is not a seaborgium and tools Ictiobus does not hold if the kumquat does not tools Ictiobus. sent20: the subdivider is allometric. sent21: the weekly is not a kind of an aloofness if the marsupium is a kind of a seaborgium. sent22: the weekly is not mini. sent23: if that the marsupium is not a kind of a seaborgium and does tool Ictiobus is wrong the weekly is not an aloofness. sent24: the fact that the weekly does not degrade but it does snuffle Guayaquil is not right if the Gruyere does not snuffle Guayaquil. sent25: the weekly is both an aloofness and Old if it does not snuffle Guayaquil. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent20 -> int1: the subdivider is biologistic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subdivider does degrade.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the subdivider is biologistic and degrades.; sent1 -> int3: something is a grass but not mini.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the weekly does not snuffle Guayaquil.; sent25 & int4 -> int5: the weekly is an aloofness that is Old.; int5 -> int6: the weekly is a kind of an aloofness.; __UNKNOWN__