the ayah does not subtilize tetrodotoxin.
sent1: the crappie is a saint if the fact that there is something such that that it is a kind of non-evening thing that does not ogle webpage is incorrect is not false. sent2: the fact that something does ogle webpage and it makes is wrong if it does not even. sent3: if the ayah subtilizes tetrodotoxin then the tastebud is expansive. sent4: if the tastebud is expansive then the fact that the tetrodotoxin does subtilize fizzing and is not expansive does not hold. sent5: something is not a saint if it is cataphatic. sent6: if something does not make then that it is non-evening thing that does not ogle webpage is incorrect. sent7: everything is cataphatic and it is statistical. sent8: everything does not even. sent9: if that that the tetrodotoxin does subtilize fizzing and is not expansive is not wrong is not right it does not make.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ayah does subtilize tetrodotoxin is right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the tastebud is expansive.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the tetrodotoxin subtilizes fizzing but it is not expansive is incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the tetrodotoxin does not make.; sent6 -> int4: that the tetrodotoxin is not evening and it does not ogle webpage is not correct if it does not make.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the tetrodotoxin is non-evening thing that does not ogle webpage is not right.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it does not even and does not ogle webpage is not right.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the crappie is a saint.; sent5 -> int8: the crappie is not a kind of a saint if it is cataphatic.; sent7 -> int9: the crappie is both cataphatic and statistical.; int9 -> int10: the crappie is not non-cataphatic.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the crappie is not a saint.; int7 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the ayah subtilizes tetrodotoxin.
sent8 -> int13: the crappie does not even.; sent2 -> int14: if the crappie does not even that it does ogle webpage and does make is false.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the crappie does ogle webpage and does make does not hold.; int15 -> int16: there is nothing that ogles webpage and makes.; int16 -> int17: that the tetrodotoxin ogles webpage and makes is incorrect.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it ogles webpage and makes does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the ayah does not subtilize tetrodotoxin. ; $context$ = sent1: the crappie is a saint if the fact that there is something such that that it is a kind of non-evening thing that does not ogle webpage is incorrect is not false. sent2: the fact that something does ogle webpage and it makes is wrong if it does not even. sent3: if the ayah subtilizes tetrodotoxin then the tastebud is expansive. sent4: if the tastebud is expansive then the fact that the tetrodotoxin does subtilize fizzing and is not expansive does not hold. sent5: something is not a saint if it is cataphatic. sent6: if something does not make then that it is non-evening thing that does not ogle webpage is incorrect. sent7: everything is cataphatic and it is statistical. sent8: everything does not even. sent9: if that that the tetrodotoxin does subtilize fizzing and is not expansive is not wrong is not right it does not make. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ayah does subtilize tetrodotoxin is right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the tastebud is expansive.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the tetrodotoxin subtilizes fizzing but it is not expansive is incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the tetrodotoxin does not make.; sent6 -> int4: that the tetrodotoxin is not evening and it does not ogle webpage is not correct if it does not make.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the tetrodotoxin is non-evening thing that does not ogle webpage is not right.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it does not even and does not ogle webpage is not right.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the crappie is a saint.; sent5 -> int8: the crappie is not a kind of a saint if it is cataphatic.; sent7 -> int9: the crappie is both cataphatic and statistical.; int9 -> int10: the crappie is not non-cataphatic.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the crappie is not a saint.; int7 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__