that the liveliness does not occur is not correct.
sent1: that the destaining preamble does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: if the androgeneticness occurs the denotativeness happens. sent3: if the brisantness happens then that the croak occurs hold. sent4: the liveliness happens if the indecorum happens. sent5: that the reimbursing membered does not occur is triggered by that the proximateness does not occur but the Bhutaneseness happens. sent6: if the klondike does not occur then the prescriptiveness happens. sent7: if the summarization happens that the welding flunky occurs hold. sent8: not the proximateness but the Bhutanese happens. sent9: the indecorum is brought about by the welding flunky. sent10: that the klondike happens yields the reimbursing membered.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the klondike happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the reimbursing membered occurs is not false.; sent5 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the reimbursing membered does not occur is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the klondike does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the prescriptiveness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that the liveliness does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the destaining preamble does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: if the androgeneticness occurs the denotativeness happens. sent3: if the brisantness happens then that the croak occurs hold. sent4: the liveliness happens if the indecorum happens. sent5: that the reimbursing membered does not occur is triggered by that the proximateness does not occur but the Bhutaneseness happens. sent6: if the klondike does not occur then the prescriptiveness happens. sent7: if the summarization happens that the welding flunky occurs hold. sent8: not the proximateness but the Bhutanese happens. sent9: the indecorum is brought about by the welding flunky. sent10: that the klondike happens yields the reimbursing membered. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the klondike happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the reimbursing membered occurs is not false.; sent5 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the reimbursing membered does not occur is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the klondike does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the prescriptiveness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__