the waver does not occur.
sent1: the fact that not the deducing tremor but the demonstration occurs is not true if that the Waterloo happens is right. sent2: the demonstration does not occur or the wavering occurs or both if the deducing tremor does not occur. sent3: if the Waterloo does not occur that that the eschatologicalness does not occur and the expansiveness occurs is right is not true. sent4: that the heterosexism does not occur but the deniableness happens yields that the eschatologicalness does not occur. sent5: the salvaging occurs. sent6: that the deducing tremor does not occur is prevented by the non-Gilbertianness or that the unbarring hierarchy does not occur or both. sent7: the booking happens. sent8: the non-unfortunateness prevents that the demonstration does not occur. sent9: that the embolicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: that both the demonstration and the deducing tremor occurs prevents that the wavering happens. sent11: that the unfortunateness occurs is prevented by that both the hostile and the non-expansiveness occurs. sent12: the Gilbertianness does not occur and/or the unbarring hierarchy does not occur. sent13: the heterosexism does not occur and the deniableness occurs. sent14: that the Waterloo does not occur and the deducing tremor does not occur is brought about by the non-Gilbertianness. sent15: that the Waterloo does not occur and the redaction does not occur is right. sent16: if both the eschatologicalness and the expansiveness happens the fact that the postictalness does not occur is not wrong.
sent4 & sent13 -> int1: the eschatologicalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the expansiveness occurs hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the eschatologicalness but the expansiveness occurs.; sent15 -> int3: the Waterloo does not occur.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: that the eschatologicalness does not occur and the expansiveness occurs is false.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the expansiveness does not occur is not false.; sent6 & sent12 -> int7: the deducing tremor happens.;
that the postictalness does not occur is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the waver does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the deducing tremor but the demonstration occurs is not true if that the Waterloo happens is right. sent2: the demonstration does not occur or the wavering occurs or both if the deducing tremor does not occur. sent3: if the Waterloo does not occur that that the eschatologicalness does not occur and the expansiveness occurs is right is not true. sent4: that the heterosexism does not occur but the deniableness happens yields that the eschatologicalness does not occur. sent5: the salvaging occurs. sent6: that the deducing tremor does not occur is prevented by the non-Gilbertianness or that the unbarring hierarchy does not occur or both. sent7: the booking happens. sent8: the non-unfortunateness prevents that the demonstration does not occur. sent9: that the embolicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: that both the demonstration and the deducing tremor occurs prevents that the wavering happens. sent11: that the unfortunateness occurs is prevented by that both the hostile and the non-expansiveness occurs. sent12: the Gilbertianness does not occur and/or the unbarring hierarchy does not occur. sent13: the heterosexism does not occur and the deniableness occurs. sent14: that the Waterloo does not occur and the deducing tremor does not occur is brought about by the non-Gilbertianness. sent15: that the Waterloo does not occur and the redaction does not occur is right. sent16: if both the eschatologicalness and the expansiveness happens the fact that the postictalness does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent13 -> int1: the eschatologicalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the expansiveness occurs hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the eschatologicalness but the expansiveness occurs.; sent15 -> int3: the Waterloo does not occur.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: that the eschatologicalness does not occur and the expansiveness occurs is false.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the expansiveness does not occur is not false.; sent6 & sent12 -> int7: the deducing tremor happens.; __UNKNOWN__