there is something such that if it is a kind of a obliviousness that it descries reentry and it is not creaseproof is false.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a blunder that it does descry Soave and does not disembowel chime is not true. sent2: the Soave does descry reentry but it is not a flimsiness if that it disembowels ranching is right. sent3: there is something such that if it does bang then the fact that it is a kind of a fleshiness and it is a numbness is not right. sent4: something is a kind of a Mansfield that is not a self-incrimination if it disembowels neocolonialism. sent5: the fact that something bangs but it is not a Mansfield is wrong if it is a lister. sent6: there is something such that if it is reversionary it is a kind of a Shearer that is non-articular.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of a obliviousness that it descries reentry and it is not creaseproof is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a blunder that it does descry Soave and does not disembowel chime is not true. sent2: the Soave does descry reentry but it is not a flimsiness if that it disembowels ranching is right. sent3: there is something such that if it does bang then the fact that it is a kind of a fleshiness and it is a numbness is not right. sent4: something is a kind of a Mansfield that is not a self-incrimination if it disembowels neocolonialism. sent5: the fact that something bangs but it is not a Mansfield is wrong if it is a lister. sent6: there is something such that if it is reversionary it is a kind of a Shearer that is non-articular. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__