the good is not a devitalization.
sent1: the husky is dramatic if there are non-aperiodic and non-sedimentary things. sent2: something is both non-aperiodic and non-sedimentary. sent3: something does not integrate Wei if it is dramatic thing that magnifies. sent4: the husky integrates Wei and is neuroendocrine. sent5: the good does not cloister but it is a devitalization if the husky does not magnify.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the husky is dramatic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the husky magnifies.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the husky is dramatic and it magnifies.; sent3 -> int3: if the husky is dramatic and magnifies it does not integrate Wei.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the husky does not integrate Wei.; sent4 -> int5: the husky does integrate Wei.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the husky does not magnify.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the good is not a cloister and is a devitalization.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the good is not a devitalization. ; $context$ = sent1: the husky is dramatic if there are non-aperiodic and non-sedimentary things. sent2: something is both non-aperiodic and non-sedimentary. sent3: something does not integrate Wei if it is dramatic thing that magnifies. sent4: the husky integrates Wei and is neuroendocrine. sent5: the good does not cloister but it is a devitalization if the husky does not magnify. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the husky is dramatic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the husky magnifies.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the husky is dramatic and it magnifies.; sent3 -> int3: if the husky is dramatic and magnifies it does not integrate Wei.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the husky does not integrate Wei.; sent4 -> int5: the husky does integrate Wei.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the husky does not magnify.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the good is not a cloister and is a devitalization.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__