the transmission does not occur.
sent1: that the temperamentalness happens leads to that the discrimination does not occur and the nonrepresentationalness does not occur. sent2: the quietening trash and the geometricness happens. sent3: the polemics does not occur if the quietening trash occurs. sent4: the temperamentalness occurs. sent5: the administering colorcast does not occur and/or the epicyclicness does not occur. sent6: the air-to-airness occurs but the nudging does not occur if that the administering colorcast happens hold. sent7: the administering fingering triggers that the routemarch occurs. sent8: the fact that the quietening trash happens but the geometricness does not occur is not true if the polemics happens. sent9: if the fact that the quietening sponsorship but not the nonadsorbentness occurs is wrong then the juncture does not occur. sent10: the nudge does not occur. sent11: the homesteading pinto occurs and the sophistication does not occur. sent12: the transmission occurs if the epicyclicness happens. sent13: that the administering colorcast does not occur is prevented by that the polemics does not occur and the epicyclicness does not occur. sent14: the fact that the air-to-airness happens and the nudge does not occur does not hold. sent15: the fact that that the quietening sponsorship occurs but the nonadsorbentness does not occur does not hold if the discrimination does not occur is not false. sent16: that the fact that the air-to-airness occurs but the interpellation does not occur is not wrong is not correct if the routemarch happens. sent17: that the milking does not occur is brought about by that not the geometricness but the polemics occurs. sent18: if the fact that the air-to-airness occurs and the interpellation does not occur is false the fact that the air-to-airness does not occur is not false. sent19: if the juncture does not occur the homesteading tamandua occurs and/or the material happens. sent20: if the fact that the nudge does not occur and the administering colorcast occurs does not hold the administering colorcast does not occur.
sent2 -> int1: the quietening trash occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the polemics does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epicyclicness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the polemics does not occur and the epicyclicness does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the administering colorcast happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the air-to-airness happens and the nudge does not occur.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the epicyclicness occurs.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the axialness occurs and the milking does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the transmission does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the temperamentalness happens leads to that the discrimination does not occur and the nonrepresentationalness does not occur. sent2: the quietening trash and the geometricness happens. sent3: the polemics does not occur if the quietening trash occurs. sent4: the temperamentalness occurs. sent5: the administering colorcast does not occur and/or the epicyclicness does not occur. sent6: the air-to-airness occurs but the nudging does not occur if that the administering colorcast happens hold. sent7: the administering fingering triggers that the routemarch occurs. sent8: the fact that the quietening trash happens but the geometricness does not occur is not true if the polemics happens. sent9: if the fact that the quietening sponsorship but not the nonadsorbentness occurs is wrong then the juncture does not occur. sent10: the nudge does not occur. sent11: the homesteading pinto occurs and the sophistication does not occur. sent12: the transmission occurs if the epicyclicness happens. sent13: that the administering colorcast does not occur is prevented by that the polemics does not occur and the epicyclicness does not occur. sent14: the fact that the air-to-airness happens and the nudge does not occur does not hold. sent15: the fact that that the quietening sponsorship occurs but the nonadsorbentness does not occur does not hold if the discrimination does not occur is not false. sent16: that the fact that the air-to-airness occurs but the interpellation does not occur is not wrong is not correct if the routemarch happens. sent17: that the milking does not occur is brought about by that not the geometricness but the polemics occurs. sent18: if the fact that the air-to-airness occurs and the interpellation does not occur is false the fact that the air-to-airness does not occur is not false. sent19: if the juncture does not occur the homesteading tamandua occurs and/or the material happens. sent20: if the fact that the nudge does not occur and the administering colorcast occurs does not hold the administering colorcast does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the quietening trash occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the polemics does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epicyclicness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the polemics does not occur and the epicyclicness does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the administering colorcast happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the air-to-airness happens and the nudge does not occur.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the epicyclicness occurs.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__