that the energeticness happens hold.
sent1: that not the meaning scythe but the qualification happens does not hold if the offense happens. sent2: both the vaporization and the imparting skua happens. sent3: both the retrorseness and the dinging Goldsmith happens. sent4: that the vaporization does not occur is caused by that the retrorseness and the project occurs. sent5: if the interpretation does not occur both the favorableness and the dinging configuration occurs. sent6: that the energeticness does not occur and/or that the retrorseness does not occur prevents that the energeticness occurs. sent7: the energeticness occurs if not the project but the favorableness occurs. sent8: if that the favorableness does not occur hold then the vaporization happens and/or the projecting occurs. sent9: the interpretation does not occur if the fact that the meaning scythe does not occur and the qualification occurs is not correct. sent10: the offense happens.
sent3 -> int1: the retrorseness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the project happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the retrorseness and the project occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the vaporization happens is false.; sent2 -> int4: the vaporization occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the project does not occur.; sent1 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that not the meaning scythe but the qualification occurs is incorrect.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the interpretation does not occur.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the favorableness occurs and the dinging configuration happens.; int9 -> int10: the favorableness occurs.; int6 & int10 -> int11: not the projecting but the favorableness occurs.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the energeticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the energeticness happens hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the meaning scythe but the qualification happens does not hold if the offense happens. sent2: both the vaporization and the imparting skua happens. sent3: both the retrorseness and the dinging Goldsmith happens. sent4: that the vaporization does not occur is caused by that the retrorseness and the project occurs. sent5: if the interpretation does not occur both the favorableness and the dinging configuration occurs. sent6: that the energeticness does not occur and/or that the retrorseness does not occur prevents that the energeticness occurs. sent7: the energeticness occurs if not the project but the favorableness occurs. sent8: if that the favorableness does not occur hold then the vaporization happens and/or the projecting occurs. sent9: the interpretation does not occur if the fact that the meaning scythe does not occur and the qualification occurs is not correct. sent10: the offense happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the retrorseness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the project happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the retrorseness and the project occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the vaporization happens is false.; sent2 -> int4: the vaporization occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the project does not occur.; sent1 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that not the meaning scythe but the qualification occurs is incorrect.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the interpretation does not occur.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the favorableness occurs and the dinging configuration happens.; int9 -> int10: the favorableness occurs.; int6 & int10 -> int11: not the projecting but the favorableness occurs.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__