the bullpen is not a cymbal or it is not a smash or both.
sent1: the star does mask Streep if the bullpen mask Streep. sent2: if a postnuptial thing courses then the star is not a cymbal. sent3: the bullpen is not a course if something that is a cymbal is a smash. sent4: if the star is not postnuptial then the fact that the conjugate is either not postnuptial or not a cymbal or both does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that it is not noticeable and it does not mask Streep then the star is not a course. sent6: the bullpen is homonymic if it bawls conjugate. sent7: either the bullpen is not a cymbal or it does not smash or both if the conjugate is not postnuptial. sent8: if something is either not noticeable or not a smash or both it is not noticeable. sent9: the bullpen masks Streep if it is homonymic. sent10: if the fact that the tupik is not homonymic is correct then the architecture is not noticeable and does not mask Streep. sent11: something that masks Streep is not noticeable or not a smash or both. sent12: if that something is an antiphon and/or it does not bawl Cuvier is wrong then it does not bawl poundal. sent13: the driver is not a kind of a Methodists if the hemin does not bawl fogbank but it is a ting. sent14: if the fact that the star is not a cymbal is not incorrect then that either the bullpen is not a cymbal or it does not smash or both is false. sent15: if something is not noticeable the fact that it is not postnuptial and it is not a cymbal is wrong. sent16: if something is not glorious then it is not homonymic and does not bawl conjugate. sent17: the conjugate is postnuptial. sent18: the fact that the bullpen is a cymbal is true. sent19: the conjugate is a course. sent20: the sternpost does mask Streep if the conjugate does mask Streep. sent21: if there exists something such that it does not bawl poundal then the tupik is not glorious. sent22: the hemin does not bawl fogbank but it is a ting. sent23: that either something is an antiphon or it does not bawl Cuvier or both is false if it is not a Methodists. sent24: the conjugate masks Streep if the star does masks Streep.
sent17 & sent19 -> int1: that the conjugate is postnuptial thing that courses is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of postnuptial thing that does course.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the star is not a cymbal.; sent14 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the sternpost courses.
sent15 -> int4: if the sternpost is not noticeable the fact that it is both not postnuptial and not a cymbal is incorrect.; sent8 -> int5: if the sternpost either is not noticeable or does not smash or both it is not noticeable.; sent11 -> int6: if the sternpost masks Streep then it is not noticeable or not a smash or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the bullpen is not a cymbal or it is not a smash or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the star does mask Streep if the bullpen mask Streep. sent2: if a postnuptial thing courses then the star is not a cymbal. sent3: the bullpen is not a course if something that is a cymbal is a smash. sent4: if the star is not postnuptial then the fact that the conjugate is either not postnuptial or not a cymbal or both does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that it is not noticeable and it does not mask Streep then the star is not a course. sent6: the bullpen is homonymic if it bawls conjugate. sent7: either the bullpen is not a cymbal or it does not smash or both if the conjugate is not postnuptial. sent8: if something is either not noticeable or not a smash or both it is not noticeable. sent9: the bullpen masks Streep if it is homonymic. sent10: if the fact that the tupik is not homonymic is correct then the architecture is not noticeable and does not mask Streep. sent11: something that masks Streep is not noticeable or not a smash or both. sent12: if that something is an antiphon and/or it does not bawl Cuvier is wrong then it does not bawl poundal. sent13: the driver is not a kind of a Methodists if the hemin does not bawl fogbank but it is a ting. sent14: if the fact that the star is not a cymbal is not incorrect then that either the bullpen is not a cymbal or it does not smash or both is false. sent15: if something is not noticeable the fact that it is not postnuptial and it is not a cymbal is wrong. sent16: if something is not glorious then it is not homonymic and does not bawl conjugate. sent17: the conjugate is postnuptial. sent18: the fact that the bullpen is a cymbal is true. sent19: the conjugate is a course. sent20: the sternpost does mask Streep if the conjugate does mask Streep. sent21: if there exists something such that it does not bawl poundal then the tupik is not glorious. sent22: the hemin does not bawl fogbank but it is a ting. sent23: that either something is an antiphon or it does not bawl Cuvier or both is false if it is not a Methodists. sent24: the conjugate masks Streep if the star does masks Streep. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent19 -> int1: that the conjugate is postnuptial thing that courses is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of postnuptial thing that does course.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the star is not a cymbal.; sent14 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__