the copilot does not page totipotency.
sent1: the oxyphencyclimine does page totipotency. sent2: if the oxyphencyclimine is a kind of a planarian then the copilot pages totipotency. sent3: if the oxyphencyclimine is a one-ninth but it does not translate the panhandler is not pyrochemical. sent4: the oxyphencyclimine is anthropological. sent5: that the oxyphencyclimine does not prolong is not wrong if it is not irreplaceable. sent6: if the oxyphencyclimine does not prolong but it is anthropological it is a planarian. sent7: if the panhandler is not anthropological then the oxyphencyclimine is pyrochemical. sent8: the fact that the fact that the copilot prolongs and pages totipotency is not right is not false. sent9: the panhandler is pyrochemical. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of non-irreplaceable thing that is not pyrochemical does not hold if that it prolongs hold. sent11: the panhandler is choreographic. sent12: if the fact that the oxyphencyclimine is a one-ninth and does not translate is false it is not irreplaceable. sent13: the copilot is irreplaceable. sent14: the larva does not translate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oxyphencyclimine is a one-ninth but it does not translate.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the panhandler is not pyrochemical hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the oxyphencyclimine is a kind of a one-ninth that does not translate is not incorrect is not true.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the oxyphencyclimine is not irreplaceable.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the oxyphencyclimine does not prolong.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the oxyphencyclimine does not prolong but it is anthropological.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the oxyphencyclimine is a planarian is not wrong.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the cunner is non-irreplaceable.
$hypothesis$ = the copilot does not page totipotency. ; $context$ = sent1: the oxyphencyclimine does page totipotency. sent2: if the oxyphencyclimine is a kind of a planarian then the copilot pages totipotency. sent3: if the oxyphencyclimine is a one-ninth but it does not translate the panhandler is not pyrochemical. sent4: the oxyphencyclimine is anthropological. sent5: that the oxyphencyclimine does not prolong is not wrong if it is not irreplaceable. sent6: if the oxyphencyclimine does not prolong but it is anthropological it is a planarian. sent7: if the panhandler is not anthropological then the oxyphencyclimine is pyrochemical. sent8: the fact that the fact that the copilot prolongs and pages totipotency is not right is not false. sent9: the panhandler is pyrochemical. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of non-irreplaceable thing that is not pyrochemical does not hold if that it prolongs hold. sent11: the panhandler is choreographic. sent12: if the fact that the oxyphencyclimine is a one-ninth and does not translate is false it is not irreplaceable. sent13: the copilot is irreplaceable. sent14: the larva does not translate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oxyphencyclimine is a one-ninth but it does not translate.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the panhandler is not pyrochemical hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the oxyphencyclimine is a kind of a one-ninth that does not translate is not incorrect is not true.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the oxyphencyclimine is not irreplaceable.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the oxyphencyclimine does not prolong.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the oxyphencyclimine does not prolong but it is anthropological.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the oxyphencyclimine is a planarian is not wrong.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__