the calcite is a spinet.
sent1: something does update missile if the fact that it does not startle detective and/or it does not startle affectionateness is not right. sent2: everything does update missile or it does startle macaw or both. sent3: if that the assenter does not startle detective and/or it startles affectionateness is not right then it updates missile. sent4: the assenter is not a spinet. sent5: everything does not update missile and/or does startle macaw. sent6: the assenter does not startle macaw if the calcite startles affectionateness. sent7: something that does dropkick Boehmenism updates missile and is not a kind of a treasurer. sent8: if the assenter is not a treasurer it does startle affectionateness. sent9: if the assenter updates missile and is not a kind of a treasurer then the fact that the calcite is a spinet is not wrong. sent10: the assenter startles affectionateness. sent11: something updates missile if the fact that it does not startle detective or it does startle affectionateness or both is incorrect. sent12: something that either does not update missile or does startle macaw or both does not update missile. sent13: the calcite is not a spinet if the assenter is a treasurer. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it either dropkicks koruna or is not altruistic or both does not hold. sent15: if the vacuole does not dropkick decipherer and it is not syncategorematic the Fentanyl does not dropkick decipherer. sent16: something is tuneful if it is a deist. sent17: if something is tuneful then it does startle macaw. sent18: if the assenter is not a treasurer then that it does not startle detective and/or does not startle affectionateness is not true. sent19: if the fact that the Fentanyl does not dropkick decipherer is not false then it is a kind of a millinery and it is deist. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it either does dropkick koruna or is not altruistic or both is false the vacuole does not dropkick decipherer. sent21: the vacuole is not syncategorematic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the assenter is not a kind of a treasurer.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that either the assenter does not startle detective or it does not startle affectionateness or both hold is false.; sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the assenter does not startle detective or does not startle affectionateness or both is not right it does update missile.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the assenter updates missile.; sent12 -> int4: if the assenter does not update missile and/or startles macaw it does not update missile.; sent5 -> int5: the assenter does not update missile or it startles macaw or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the assenter does not update missile.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the assenter is a kind of a treasurer.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the calcite is a spinet.
sent7 -> int9: the assenter does update missile and is not a treasurer if it dropkicks Boehmenism.; sent17 -> int10: if the Fentanyl is tuneful then it does startle macaw.; sent16 -> int11: if the fact that the Fentanyl is a kind of a deist is correct then it is tuneful.; sent14 & sent20 -> int12: the vacuole does not dropkick decipherer.; int12 & sent21 -> int13: the vacuole does not dropkick decipherer and it is not syncategorematic.; sent15 & int13 -> int14: the Fentanyl does not dropkick decipherer.; sent19 & int14 -> int15: the Fentanyl is a millinery and it is deist.; int15 -> int16: the Fentanyl is deist.; int11 & int16 -> int17: the Fentanyl is tuneful.; int10 & int17 -> int18: the Fentanyl startles macaw.; int18 -> int19: something does startle macaw.;
$hypothesis$ = the calcite is a spinet. ; $context$ = sent1: something does update missile if the fact that it does not startle detective and/or it does not startle affectionateness is not right. sent2: everything does update missile or it does startle macaw or both. sent3: if that the assenter does not startle detective and/or it startles affectionateness is not right then it updates missile. sent4: the assenter is not a spinet. sent5: everything does not update missile and/or does startle macaw. sent6: the assenter does not startle macaw if the calcite startles affectionateness. sent7: something that does dropkick Boehmenism updates missile and is not a kind of a treasurer. sent8: if the assenter is not a treasurer it does startle affectionateness. sent9: if the assenter updates missile and is not a kind of a treasurer then the fact that the calcite is a spinet is not wrong. sent10: the assenter startles affectionateness. sent11: something updates missile if the fact that it does not startle detective or it does startle affectionateness or both is incorrect. sent12: something that either does not update missile or does startle macaw or both does not update missile. sent13: the calcite is not a spinet if the assenter is a treasurer. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it either dropkicks koruna or is not altruistic or both does not hold. sent15: if the vacuole does not dropkick decipherer and it is not syncategorematic the Fentanyl does not dropkick decipherer. sent16: something is tuneful if it is a deist. sent17: if something is tuneful then it does startle macaw. sent18: if the assenter is not a treasurer then that it does not startle detective and/or does not startle affectionateness is not true. sent19: if the fact that the Fentanyl does not dropkick decipherer is not false then it is a kind of a millinery and it is deist. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it either does dropkick koruna or is not altruistic or both is false the vacuole does not dropkick decipherer. sent21: the vacuole is not syncategorematic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the assenter is not a kind of a treasurer.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that either the assenter does not startle detective or it does not startle affectionateness or both hold is false.; sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the assenter does not startle detective or does not startle affectionateness or both is not right it does update missile.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the assenter updates missile.; sent12 -> int4: if the assenter does not update missile and/or startles macaw it does not update missile.; sent5 -> int5: the assenter does not update missile or it startles macaw or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the assenter does not update missile.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the assenter is a kind of a treasurer.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__