the hawser does not justify and is a group.
sent1: something is not corrigible. sent2: that the hawser does justify and is a group is wrong. sent3: if the obelion does not justify the fact that the hawser does justify and groups is not true. sent4: that the succession is nonadsorbent and it is a squinter is incorrect if there are non-corrigible things. sent5: the fact that the succession is nonadsorbent and is not a kind of a squinter is wrong if there are incorrigible things. sent6: if the fact that the succession is nonadsorbent thing that is not a squinter is not true the obelion does not justify. sent7: there is something such that it is corrigible. sent8: that the succession is a kind of nonadsorbent a squinter is incorrect. sent9: the obelion does not justify if the fact that the succession is a squinter hold. sent10: the fact that the hawser does not justify but it is a group is false if the obelion does not justify.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the succession is not adsorbent and is not a squinter is incorrect.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the obelion does not justify.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the hawser does not justify and is a group. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not corrigible. sent2: that the hawser does justify and is a group is wrong. sent3: if the obelion does not justify the fact that the hawser does justify and groups is not true. sent4: that the succession is nonadsorbent and it is a squinter is incorrect if there are non-corrigible things. sent5: the fact that the succession is nonadsorbent and is not a kind of a squinter is wrong if there are incorrigible things. sent6: if the fact that the succession is nonadsorbent thing that is not a squinter is not true the obelion does not justify. sent7: there is something such that it is corrigible. sent8: that the succession is a kind of nonadsorbent a squinter is incorrect. sent9: the obelion does not justify if the fact that the succession is a squinter hold. sent10: the fact that the hawser does not justify but it is a group is false if the obelion does not justify. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the succession is not adsorbent and is not a squinter is incorrect.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the obelion does not justify.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__