the stateroom articulates laziness but it is not Brobdingnagian.
sent1: the stateroom is a Scottish if that the ride is a Scottish is not incorrect. sent2: the ride is a kind of a Scottish. sent3: that something articulates laziness but it is not Brobdingnagian is not correct if it is a Scottish. sent4: the stateroom does articulate laziness but it is not Brobdingnagian if it is not a kind of a Scottish. sent5: if something is a kind of a organdy the fact that it is a Sabbatarian that abstracts does not hold. sent6: the fact that the ride is a Scottish and it is Brobdingnagian is incorrect if it articulates laziness.
sent3 -> int1: if the stateroom is a kind of a Scottish then the fact that it does articulate laziness and is non-Brobdingnagian is false.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the stateroom is a Scottish.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the stateroom articulates laziness but it is not Brobdingnagian.
$hypothesis$ = the stateroom articulates laziness but it is not Brobdingnagian. ; $context$ = sent1: the stateroom is a Scottish if that the ride is a Scottish is not incorrect. sent2: the ride is a kind of a Scottish. sent3: that something articulates laziness but it is not Brobdingnagian is not correct if it is a Scottish. sent4: the stateroom does articulate laziness but it is not Brobdingnagian if it is not a kind of a Scottish. sent5: if something is a kind of a organdy the fact that it is a Sabbatarian that abstracts does not hold. sent6: the fact that the ride is a Scottish and it is Brobdingnagian is incorrect if it articulates laziness. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the stateroom is a kind of a Scottish then the fact that it does articulate laziness and is non-Brobdingnagian is false.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the stateroom is a Scottish.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__