the sailor is a curmudgeon.
sent1: the transformer is a kind of non-achenial a Islamabad. sent2: the Venushair is not a visored but it is a ideography. sent3: the fact that that the fossilization does open sailor and is the lexeme is incorrect if that the fossilization does not remove is correct hold. sent4: there is something such that it is not siliceous. sent5: the sailor is achenial. sent6: something does not open sailor and/or it is a remove if it is not achenial. sent7: the fossilization is not a lexeme. sent8: everything is not provencal. sent9: the transformer is not a remove. sent10: if there are achenial things then the fact that the transformer is a kind of an omnibus and it is a curmudgeon does not hold. sent11: the fuller is not microelectronic but it is syncretic. sent12: if something that is not a kind of an omnibus is a Islamabad the fuller is a kind of a lexeme. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it does open sailor and is a lexeme is false then the fuller is not a Islamabad. sent14: the transformer is not a lexeme. sent15: something is not achenial if the fact that it is a Sivapithecus and it is achenial does not hold. sent16: everything is not an omnibus. sent17: the sailor is not a curmudgeon if that the fossilization opens sailor and is a remove is incorrect. sent18: that the fact that the sander is a Sivapithecus that is achenial is not true hold. sent19: if the fact that the sailor is not a Islamabad is correct then the transformer is not a curmudgeon. sent20: the sailor is not sigmoid. sent21: if the fossilization is a lexeme then the fuller is a Islamabad. sent22: something opens sailor. sent23: that the fossilization does open sailor and it is a remove is not right if something is a lexeme. sent24: the fuller opens sailor.
sent16 -> int1: the transformer is not a kind of an omnibus.; sent1 -> int2: that the transformer is a Islamabad is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the transformer is not an omnibus and is a Islamabad.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an omnibus and is a Islamabad.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fuller is a kind of a lexeme.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a lexeme.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: that the fossilization opens sailor and removes is not correct.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the flatfoot is not a Islamabad.
$hypothesis$ = the sailor is a curmudgeon. ; $context$ = sent1: the transformer is a kind of non-achenial a Islamabad. sent2: the Venushair is not a visored but it is a ideography. sent3: the fact that that the fossilization does open sailor and is the lexeme is incorrect if that the fossilization does not remove is correct hold. sent4: there is something such that it is not siliceous. sent5: the sailor is achenial. sent6: something does not open sailor and/or it is a remove if it is not achenial. sent7: the fossilization is not a lexeme. sent8: everything is not provencal. sent9: the transformer is not a remove. sent10: if there are achenial things then the fact that the transformer is a kind of an omnibus and it is a curmudgeon does not hold. sent11: the fuller is not microelectronic but it is syncretic. sent12: if something that is not a kind of an omnibus is a Islamabad the fuller is a kind of a lexeme. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it does open sailor and is a lexeme is false then the fuller is not a Islamabad. sent14: the transformer is not a lexeme. sent15: something is not achenial if the fact that it is a Sivapithecus and it is achenial does not hold. sent16: everything is not an omnibus. sent17: the sailor is not a curmudgeon if that the fossilization opens sailor and is a remove is incorrect. sent18: that the fact that the sander is a Sivapithecus that is achenial is not true hold. sent19: if the fact that the sailor is not a Islamabad is correct then the transformer is not a curmudgeon. sent20: the sailor is not sigmoid. sent21: if the fossilization is a lexeme then the fuller is a Islamabad. sent22: something opens sailor. sent23: that the fossilization does open sailor and it is a remove is not right if something is a lexeme. sent24: the fuller opens sailor. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the transformer is not a kind of an omnibus.; sent1 -> int2: that the transformer is a Islamabad is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the transformer is not an omnibus and is a Islamabad.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an omnibus and is a Islamabad.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fuller is a kind of a lexeme.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a lexeme.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: that the fossilization opens sailor and removes is not correct.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__