the fact that that the bulb is non-limbic and not regretful is not correct if the booklet is papilliform is wrong.
sent1: if the bulb is unregretful then that the Sweet is non-Hawaiian but it is a kind of a piculet does not hold. sent2: if either the solitaire is unregretful or it is not a kind of a piculet or both then the gunnery is not a piculet. sent3: the bulb is non-limbic thing that is unregretful. sent4: if the bulb is not a piculet then the fact that it is limbic and is unregretful does not hold. sent5: if the solitaire is not non-limbic it is unregretful and/or is not a piculet. sent6: the booklet is a kind of a piculet. sent7: if the booklet is papilliform then that the bulb is limbic and it is unregretful is false. sent8: that something is both not non-limbic and unregretful is not true if it is not a piculet. sent9: something is Coleridgian if it does read bended. sent10: the fact that something is not limbic but it is unregretful is incorrect if it is not a piculet. sent11: something that is a rippled is Hawaiian. sent12: if something is not memberless the fact that it is not prejudicial but a Pygmy does not hold. sent13: if the booklet is papilliform then the Sweet does smell ferule. sent14: that the bulb is limbic and is unregretful is wrong. sent15: if the bulb is not Hawaiian it is not limbic and it does ripple. sent16: the Sweet is papilliform if the bulb is a kind of a Hawaiian. sent17: the bulb is not limbic but it is unregretful if the booklet is papilliform. sent18: if the Sweet is not non-Hawaiian the bulb is not a kind of a piculet. sent19: the solitaire is limbic. sent20: the bulb is both non-limbic and unregretful if it is not a piculet. sent21: if the bulb smells ferule then the fact that the Sweet is a rippled and it is a piculet is not correct. sent22: if something does smell ferule then it is a rippled.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the booklet is papilliform.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Sweet smells ferule.; sent22 -> int2: the Sweet ripples if it does smell ferule.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Sweet ripples.; sent11 -> int4: the Sweet is a kind of a Hawaiian if it is a kind of a rippled.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Sweet is Hawaiian.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the bulb is not a piculet.; sent10 -> int7: if the bulb is not a piculet then the fact that it is not limbic and it is unregretful does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the bulb is non-limbic and unregretful is wrong.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the vicereine does not smell ferule is not right.
sent5 & sent19 -> int9: the solitaire is not regretful and/or it is not a piculet.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the gunnery is not a piculet.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a piculet.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the bulb is non-limbic and not regretful is not correct if the booklet is papilliform is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bulb is unregretful then that the Sweet is non-Hawaiian but it is a kind of a piculet does not hold. sent2: if either the solitaire is unregretful or it is not a kind of a piculet or both then the gunnery is not a piculet. sent3: the bulb is non-limbic thing that is unregretful. sent4: if the bulb is not a piculet then the fact that it is limbic and is unregretful does not hold. sent5: if the solitaire is not non-limbic it is unregretful and/or is not a piculet. sent6: the booklet is a kind of a piculet. sent7: if the booklet is papilliform then that the bulb is limbic and it is unregretful is false. sent8: that something is both not non-limbic and unregretful is not true if it is not a piculet. sent9: something is Coleridgian if it does read bended. sent10: the fact that something is not limbic but it is unregretful is incorrect if it is not a piculet. sent11: something that is a rippled is Hawaiian. sent12: if something is not memberless the fact that it is not prejudicial but a Pygmy does not hold. sent13: if the booklet is papilliform then the Sweet does smell ferule. sent14: that the bulb is limbic and is unregretful is wrong. sent15: if the bulb is not Hawaiian it is not limbic and it does ripple. sent16: the Sweet is papilliform if the bulb is a kind of a Hawaiian. sent17: the bulb is not limbic but it is unregretful if the booklet is papilliform. sent18: if the Sweet is not non-Hawaiian the bulb is not a kind of a piculet. sent19: the solitaire is limbic. sent20: the bulb is both non-limbic and unregretful if it is not a piculet. sent21: if the bulb smells ferule then the fact that the Sweet is a rippled and it is a piculet is not correct. sent22: if something does smell ferule then it is a rippled. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the booklet is papilliform.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Sweet smells ferule.; sent22 -> int2: the Sweet ripples if it does smell ferule.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Sweet ripples.; sent11 -> int4: the Sweet is a kind of a Hawaiian if it is a kind of a rippled.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Sweet is Hawaiian.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the bulb is not a piculet.; sent10 -> int7: if the bulb is not a piculet then the fact that it is not limbic and it is unregretful does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the bulb is non-limbic and unregretful is wrong.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__