the fact that the rheometer is not immunocompetent if the Guinness is not a kind of a pharisee is not correct.
sent1: the Guinness is a kind of a pharisee if there exists something such that the fact that it either is not a protozoology or is hieroglyphic or both is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the rheometer does not stumble passivity is not wrong that it is not a protozoology and/or is hieroglyphic is false. sent3: something that stumbles passivity is not immunocompetent. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a Pablum. sent5: if the fact that something does not stumble passivity and is a pharisee is not correct that it is immunocompetent hold. sent6: something is a yield if the fact that it does count fungus hold. sent7: there exists something such that it is not gymnastic or it does stumble cabalist or both. sent8: if the Guinness is not immunocompetent that either it does not count Khabarovsk or it is a Milanese or both is not right. sent9: there is something such that that it is a protozoology or it is hieroglyphic or both is false. sent10: the rheometer is a pharisee if the Guinness does not stumble passivity. sent11: there is something such that it does not grade vesicant or is a kind of a batiste or both. sent12: something is not a clamber.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the rheometer does not stumble passivity.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the rheometer is not a kind of a protozoology and/or it is hieroglyphic is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a protozoology and/or it is hieroglyphic is not correct.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Guinness is a pharisee.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Guinness is not a pharisee.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the rheometer does stumble passivity.; sent3 -> int6: the rheometer is not immunocompetent if it does stumble passivity.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the rheometer is not immunocompetent.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the carabiner is immunocompetent.
sent5 -> int8: the carabiner is immunocompetent if that it does not stumble passivity and is a pharisee is not correct.; sent6 -> int9: the rheometer is a yield if it does count fungus.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the rheometer is not immunocompetent if the Guinness is not a kind of a pharisee is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Guinness is a kind of a pharisee if there exists something such that the fact that it either is not a protozoology or is hieroglyphic or both is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the rheometer does not stumble passivity is not wrong that it is not a protozoology and/or is hieroglyphic is false. sent3: something that stumbles passivity is not immunocompetent. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a Pablum. sent5: if the fact that something does not stumble passivity and is a pharisee is not correct that it is immunocompetent hold. sent6: something is a yield if the fact that it does count fungus hold. sent7: there exists something such that it is not gymnastic or it does stumble cabalist or both. sent8: if the Guinness is not immunocompetent that either it does not count Khabarovsk or it is a Milanese or both is not right. sent9: there is something such that that it is a protozoology or it is hieroglyphic or both is false. sent10: the rheometer is a pharisee if the Guinness does not stumble passivity. sent11: there is something such that it does not grade vesicant or is a kind of a batiste or both. sent12: something is not a clamber. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the rheometer does not stumble passivity.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the rheometer is not a kind of a protozoology and/or it is hieroglyphic is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a protozoology and/or it is hieroglyphic is not correct.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Guinness is a pharisee.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Guinness is not a pharisee.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the rheometer does stumble passivity.; sent3 -> int6: the rheometer is not immunocompetent if it does stumble passivity.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the rheometer is not immunocompetent.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__