that that the conditioning happens is prevented by that the unpicking Ugandan does not occur and the satiating does not occur is not correct.
sent1: if the transfiguration does not occur then that the conditions but not the Machiavellian occurs is incorrect. sent2: the furloughing shamrock does not occur and the infantilism does not occur. sent3: the fact that the furloughing oxidase does not occur is not wrong. sent4: the furloughing kingsnake occurs. sent5: the scrotalness happens. sent6: if the juiciness does not occur the transfiguration happens and the debuting detergency happens. sent7: the conditioning does not occur if not the unpicking Ugandan but the satiating happens. sent8: the psychosurgery does not occur and the calcining does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the unpicking Ugandan does not occur and the satiating does not occur hold then the Machiavellianness does not occur. sent10: the transfiguration does not occur but the scrotalness occurs. sent11: that the homily happens but the water does not occur results in that the abscission does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the Machiavellianness and the conditioning occurs is not right then the pyrography does not occur. sent13: the Machiavellianness does not occur if not the unpicking Ugandan but the satiateness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unpicking Ugandan does not occur and the satiateness does not occur.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the Machiavellian does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conditions happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the conditioning and the non-Machiavellianness happens.; sent10 -> int3: the transfiguration does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the conditioning but not the Machiavellian happens is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the conditions does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the debuting detergency but not the pyrography happens.
$hypothesis$ = that that the conditioning happens is prevented by that the unpicking Ugandan does not occur and the satiating does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the transfiguration does not occur then that the conditions but not the Machiavellian occurs is incorrect. sent2: the furloughing shamrock does not occur and the infantilism does not occur. sent3: the fact that the furloughing oxidase does not occur is not wrong. sent4: the furloughing kingsnake occurs. sent5: the scrotalness happens. sent6: if the juiciness does not occur the transfiguration happens and the debuting detergency happens. sent7: the conditioning does not occur if not the unpicking Ugandan but the satiating happens. sent8: the psychosurgery does not occur and the calcining does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the unpicking Ugandan does not occur and the satiating does not occur hold then the Machiavellianness does not occur. sent10: the transfiguration does not occur but the scrotalness occurs. sent11: that the homily happens but the water does not occur results in that the abscission does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the Machiavellianness and the conditioning occurs is not right then the pyrography does not occur. sent13: the Machiavellianness does not occur if not the unpicking Ugandan but the satiateness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unpicking Ugandan does not occur and the satiateness does not occur.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the Machiavellian does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conditions happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the conditioning and the non-Machiavellianness happens.; sent10 -> int3: the transfiguration does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the conditioning but not the Machiavellian happens is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the conditions does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__