the patching does not occur.
sent1: if the invasiveness happens and the Cameroonian occurs the Rwandanness does not occur. sent2: the Cameroonianness occurs and the endoergicness happens. sent3: the regularness happens. sent4: the revenging Bittacidae does not occur if the preservation occurs. sent5: the revenging urging does not occur. sent6: the fact that the stunner happens but the connection does not occur is wrong if the revenging urging does not occur. sent7: the invasiveness occurs. sent8: the Cameroonianness does not occur and the patching does not occur if the endoergicness does not occur. sent9: if the Rwandan does not occur the regularness happens. sent10: the non-Rwandanness leads to that the regularness and the patching happens. sent11: that the forte does not occur brings about that the calcining does not occur or the gossip does not occur or both. sent12: if that the fact that the stunner happens and the connection does not occur is right is wrong the emblazoning fascism does not occur. sent13: if the arbitrableness does not occur then the forte does not occur. sent14: the chrysotherapy occurs and the revenging compartmentalization happens. sent15: if the regular does not occur then the fact that the noninvasiveness and the non-Rwandanness occurs is not true. sent16: that the revenging Bittacidae does not occur and the life-supportness does not occur yields the nonarbitrableness. sent17: either the preservation or the condensing or both occurs if the fact that the emblazoning fascism does not occur is right. sent18: the revenging Bittacidae does not occur if the condensing occurs. sent19: the sedition and the Cameroonianness occurs if the endoergicness does not occur. sent20: the endoergicness happens.
sent2 -> int1: the Cameroonianness happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the invasiveness and the Cameroonian occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Rwandan does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the regular occurs and the patching happens.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the patching does not occur.
sent6 & sent5 -> int5: that the stunner happens but the connection does not occur is false.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the emblazoning fascism does not occur.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: the preservation and/or the condensing occurs.; int7 & sent4 & sent18 -> int8: the revenging Bittacidae does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the patching does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the invasiveness happens and the Cameroonian occurs the Rwandanness does not occur. sent2: the Cameroonianness occurs and the endoergicness happens. sent3: the regularness happens. sent4: the revenging Bittacidae does not occur if the preservation occurs. sent5: the revenging urging does not occur. sent6: the fact that the stunner happens but the connection does not occur is wrong if the revenging urging does not occur. sent7: the invasiveness occurs. sent8: the Cameroonianness does not occur and the patching does not occur if the endoergicness does not occur. sent9: if the Rwandan does not occur the regularness happens. sent10: the non-Rwandanness leads to that the regularness and the patching happens. sent11: that the forte does not occur brings about that the calcining does not occur or the gossip does not occur or both. sent12: if that the fact that the stunner happens and the connection does not occur is right is wrong the emblazoning fascism does not occur. sent13: if the arbitrableness does not occur then the forte does not occur. sent14: the chrysotherapy occurs and the revenging compartmentalization happens. sent15: if the regular does not occur then the fact that the noninvasiveness and the non-Rwandanness occurs is not true. sent16: that the revenging Bittacidae does not occur and the life-supportness does not occur yields the nonarbitrableness. sent17: either the preservation or the condensing or both occurs if the fact that the emblazoning fascism does not occur is right. sent18: the revenging Bittacidae does not occur if the condensing occurs. sent19: the sedition and the Cameroonianness occurs if the endoergicness does not occur. sent20: the endoergicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the Cameroonianness happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the invasiveness and the Cameroonian occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Rwandan does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the regular occurs and the patching happens.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__