the net does not guarantee tricorn.
sent1: the pantsuit is a determent if the carbon dissents Tucker. sent2: the net does guarantee Duma if the trellis does arrogate Haganah. sent3: if that the carbon does not dissent Tucker and does not tube is wrong then the pantsuit is a kind of a determent. sent4: the trellis arrogates Haganah if the pantsuit is a determent. sent5: the trellis guarantees Duma if the net arrogates Haganah. sent6: that the trellis is mechanical and does not arrogate Haganah is false if it does not guarantee tricorn. sent7: the fact that the carbon dissents Tucker but it is not a tube is not correct. sent8: that the carbon does dissent Tucker but it does not tube does not hold if it is not mechanical. sent9: something is not a kind of a humpback and does not guarantee Duma if it is a Limulus. sent10: the net is not a humpback if it does guarantee tricorn and it guarantees Duma. sent11: the carbon is not mechanical. sent12: if something that is not a humpback does not guarantee Duma then it does not arrogate Haganah. sent13: if something that guarantees tricorn is a kind of a humpback then the carbon does guarantee Duma. sent14: the net is not mechanical. sent15: that the trellis is a areca that is not an excavator is not true if it is a centered. sent16: if the fact that something does not jive and is allowable does not hold then it is competitive. sent17: something does guarantee tricorn if that it either is not mechanical or is not a determent or both is not true. sent18: the pantsuit is a humpback. sent19: if there exists something such that it does not scram that the carbon does not jive and is allowable is wrong. sent20: the pantsuit does not scram if there is something such that that it is a areca and not an excavator is incorrect. sent21: that the carbon does not dissent Tucker and does not tube is false if it is not mechanical. sent22: the pantsuit guarantees tricorn. sent23: if the carbon does arrogate Haganah and it is mechanical then the fern is not a kind of a determent. sent24: the trellis is a kind of a centered. sent25: that something is not unwary and is not a hutch is not true if it is competitive. sent26: if something does not arrogate Haganah then the fact that either it is nonmechanical or it is not a determent or both is not right.
sent21 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the carbon does not dissent Tucker and does not tube is not right.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the pantsuit is a determent.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the trellis arrogates Haganah is right.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the net guarantees Duma.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the net guarantees tricorn.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the net guarantees tricorn and it guarantees Duma.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the net is not a kind of a humpback.;
the fern is not a kind of a determent.
sent22 & sent18 -> int7: the pantsuit guarantees tricorn and it is a humpback.; int7 -> int8: something guarantees tricorn and it is a kind of a humpback.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the carbon does guarantee Duma.;
$hypothesis$ = the net does not guarantee tricorn. ; $context$ = sent1: the pantsuit is a determent if the carbon dissents Tucker. sent2: the net does guarantee Duma if the trellis does arrogate Haganah. sent3: if that the carbon does not dissent Tucker and does not tube is wrong then the pantsuit is a kind of a determent. sent4: the trellis arrogates Haganah if the pantsuit is a determent. sent5: the trellis guarantees Duma if the net arrogates Haganah. sent6: that the trellis is mechanical and does not arrogate Haganah is false if it does not guarantee tricorn. sent7: the fact that the carbon dissents Tucker but it is not a tube is not correct. sent8: that the carbon does dissent Tucker but it does not tube does not hold if it is not mechanical. sent9: something is not a kind of a humpback and does not guarantee Duma if it is a Limulus. sent10: the net is not a humpback if it does guarantee tricorn and it guarantees Duma. sent11: the carbon is not mechanical. sent12: if something that is not a humpback does not guarantee Duma then it does not arrogate Haganah. sent13: if something that guarantees tricorn is a kind of a humpback then the carbon does guarantee Duma. sent14: the net is not mechanical. sent15: that the trellis is a areca that is not an excavator is not true if it is a centered. sent16: if the fact that something does not jive and is allowable does not hold then it is competitive. sent17: something does guarantee tricorn if that it either is not mechanical or is not a determent or both is not true. sent18: the pantsuit is a humpback. sent19: if there exists something such that it does not scram that the carbon does not jive and is allowable is wrong. sent20: the pantsuit does not scram if there is something such that that it is a areca and not an excavator is incorrect. sent21: that the carbon does not dissent Tucker and does not tube is false if it is not mechanical. sent22: the pantsuit guarantees tricorn. sent23: if the carbon does arrogate Haganah and it is mechanical then the fern is not a kind of a determent. sent24: the trellis is a kind of a centered. sent25: that something is not unwary and is not a hutch is not true if it is competitive. sent26: if something does not arrogate Haganah then the fact that either it is nonmechanical or it is not a determent or both is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the carbon does not dissent Tucker and does not tube is not right.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the pantsuit is a determent.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the trellis arrogates Haganah is right.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the net guarantees Duma.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the net guarantees tricorn.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the net guarantees tricorn and it guarantees Duma.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the net is not a kind of a humpback.; __UNKNOWN__