the amphitheater is not a kind of an alert but it is a Muskogee.
sent1: the postulant is not hyperemic if it is alert and it is a Muskogee. sent2: the postulant does not habituate. sent3: if the ell does not preempt Decapterus then the fact that the postulant is a Bordeaux that is not a percentile is false. sent4: if that the postulant is not a percentile is not incorrect that the chaffinch either is immaterial or is a Muskogee or both is not right. sent5: the amphitheater is non-alert thing that is a Muskogee if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Bordeaux. sent6: something does preempt Decapterus if it does not jellify postulant. sent7: if there is something such that it does not jellify postulant then that the postulant does unveil is not wrong. sent8: if something that is hyperemic does jellify postulant then that it does not preempt Decapterus is correct. sent9: the postulant is not a kind of a palladium. sent10: if the fact that something is a kind of a Bordeaux that is not a percentile is false it is not a Muskogee. sent11: if the fact that the postulant habituates and/or it is hyperemic does not hold then it does not jellify postulant. sent12: something does not preempt Decapterus if it is both a percentile and a Bordeaux. sent13: that the postulant does habituate and/or it is hyperemic is false. sent14: the postulant is a kind of a percentile. sent15: the amphitheater is a Muskogee. sent16: the amphitheater is a kind of a Bordeaux.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the postulant is a Bordeaux.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the postulant is a kind of a percentile and is a Bordeaux.; sent12 -> int2: if the postulant is both a percentile and a Bordeaux it does not preempt Decapterus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the postulant does not preempt Decapterus is right.; sent6 -> int4: if the postulant does not jellify postulant then it does preempt Decapterus.; sent11 & sent13 -> int5: the postulant does not jellify postulant.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the postulant preempts Decapterus hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the postulant is not a Bordeaux.; int8 -> int9: something is not a Bordeaux.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the amphitheater is both not an alert and a Muskogee is wrong.
sent10 -> int10: the postulant is not a Muskogee if that it is a Bordeaux and is not a kind of a percentile is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the amphitheater is not a kind of an alert but it is a Muskogee. ; $context$ = sent1: the postulant is not hyperemic if it is alert and it is a Muskogee. sent2: the postulant does not habituate. sent3: if the ell does not preempt Decapterus then the fact that the postulant is a Bordeaux that is not a percentile is false. sent4: if that the postulant is not a percentile is not incorrect that the chaffinch either is immaterial or is a Muskogee or both is not right. sent5: the amphitheater is non-alert thing that is a Muskogee if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Bordeaux. sent6: something does preempt Decapterus if it does not jellify postulant. sent7: if there is something such that it does not jellify postulant then that the postulant does unveil is not wrong. sent8: if something that is hyperemic does jellify postulant then that it does not preempt Decapterus is correct. sent9: the postulant is not a kind of a palladium. sent10: if the fact that something is a kind of a Bordeaux that is not a percentile is false it is not a Muskogee. sent11: if the fact that the postulant habituates and/or it is hyperemic does not hold then it does not jellify postulant. sent12: something does not preempt Decapterus if it is both a percentile and a Bordeaux. sent13: that the postulant does habituate and/or it is hyperemic is false. sent14: the postulant is a kind of a percentile. sent15: the amphitheater is a Muskogee. sent16: the amphitheater is a kind of a Bordeaux. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the postulant is a Bordeaux.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the postulant is a kind of a percentile and is a Bordeaux.; sent12 -> int2: if the postulant is both a percentile and a Bordeaux it does not preempt Decapterus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the postulant does not preempt Decapterus is right.; sent6 -> int4: if the postulant does not jellify postulant then it does preempt Decapterus.; sent11 & sent13 -> int5: the postulant does not jellify postulant.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the postulant preempts Decapterus hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the postulant is not a Bordeaux.; int8 -> int9: something is not a Bordeaux.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__