that the zebrawood is a kind of non-androgenic thing that is lymphoid is wrong if the Gypsy does confine huffiness.
sent1: something does not ridicule gumption. sent2: the fact that the endosteum is lymphoid and it is androgenic is wrong if it does not ridicule Dylan. sent3: if that the Gypsy is not lymphoid is not wrong then that the zebrawood is not androgenic but it is lymphoid is false. sent4: if the fact that the endosteum does ridicule Dylan and it imprints is not correct then it does not ridicule Dylan. sent5: the zebrawood is not lymphoid if something is androgenic and does not ridicule cartilaginification. sent6: if something that does not ridicule cartilaginification confines huffiness it is not lymphoid. sent7: the Gypsy is not androgenic and confines huffiness. sent8: there exists something such that it does not confine Gulliver. sent9: there exists something such that it is cacodylic and it is not a kind of a cyclopropane. sent10: something is a Ukranian and does not confine Gulliver. sent11: if the zebrawood does ridicule cartilaginification then the Gypsy does not confine Gulliver.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gypsy confines huffiness.; sent6 -> int1: that the Gypsy is not lymphoid hold if it does not ridicule cartilaginification and does confine huffiness.;
the Gypsy does not confine Gulliver.
$hypothesis$ = that the zebrawood is a kind of non-androgenic thing that is lymphoid is wrong if the Gypsy does confine huffiness. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not ridicule gumption. sent2: the fact that the endosteum is lymphoid and it is androgenic is wrong if it does not ridicule Dylan. sent3: if that the Gypsy is not lymphoid is not wrong then that the zebrawood is not androgenic but it is lymphoid is false. sent4: if the fact that the endosteum does ridicule Dylan and it imprints is not correct then it does not ridicule Dylan. sent5: the zebrawood is not lymphoid if something is androgenic and does not ridicule cartilaginification. sent6: if something that does not ridicule cartilaginification confines huffiness it is not lymphoid. sent7: the Gypsy is not androgenic and confines huffiness. sent8: there exists something such that it does not confine Gulliver. sent9: there exists something such that it is cacodylic and it is not a kind of a cyclopropane. sent10: something is a Ukranian and does not confine Gulliver. sent11: if the zebrawood does ridicule cartilaginification then the Gypsy does not confine Gulliver. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gypsy confines huffiness.; sent6 -> int1: that the Gypsy is not lymphoid hold if it does not ridicule cartilaginification and does confine huffiness.; __UNKNOWN__