the gyrfalcon does hunger Coturnix if the triptych is a layoff.
sent1: the triptych is not a layoff but it is a Medford if the Chicano chinks. sent2: if the Chicano is a chink then the triptych is a kind of a Medford. sent3: if that the Chicano is not a chink is not wrong that it constructs demureness and/or is gluttonous is not incorrect. sent4: the gyrfalcon is systolic if the Chicano does construct demureness. sent5: the triptych is gluttonous if the Chicano is a Medford. sent6: the triptych is a kind of a layoff and it is a kind of a Medford. sent7: if the Chicano is gluttonous that it is systolic is not wrong. sent8: that the gyrfalcon does not hunger Coturnix is not true if it is systolic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Chicano does chink hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the triptych is not a layoff and is a Medford.; int1 -> int2: the triptych is not a layoff.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the triptych is a layoff.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Chicano does not chink.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the Chicano does construct demureness or it is gluttonous or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the gyrfalcon does hunger Coturnix if the triptych is a layoff. ; $context$ = sent1: the triptych is not a layoff but it is a Medford if the Chicano chinks. sent2: if the Chicano is a chink then the triptych is a kind of a Medford. sent3: if that the Chicano is not a chink is not wrong that it constructs demureness and/or is gluttonous is not incorrect. sent4: the gyrfalcon is systolic if the Chicano does construct demureness. sent5: the triptych is gluttonous if the Chicano is a Medford. sent6: the triptych is a kind of a layoff and it is a kind of a Medford. sent7: if the Chicano is gluttonous that it is systolic is not wrong. sent8: that the gyrfalcon does not hunger Coturnix is not true if it is systolic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Chicano does chink hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the triptych is not a layoff and is a Medford.; int1 -> int2: the triptych is not a layoff.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the triptych is a layoff.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Chicano does not chink.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the Chicano does construct demureness or it is gluttonous or both.; __UNKNOWN__