that the phlebectomy happens is not incorrect.
sent1: the visit happens. sent2: if the retracting does not occur and the impairment occurs then the phlebectomy occurs. sent3: that the mistreatment does not occur causes that the retracting does not occur or that the impairment does not occur or both. sent4: the wrestling guerdon occurs. sent5: that the mistreatment occurs is caused by that the stinting occlusion does not occur. sent6: the innocent occurs. sent7: the wiretap does not occur if both the judo and the stinting Oligocene occurs. sent8: the judo happens and the wrestling guerdon occurs. sent9: that the impairment and the mistreatment occurs is brought about by that the stinting occlusion does not occur. sent10: the doublesness happens. sent11: the howling theogony does not occur. sent12: that the innocentness occurs is prevented by that the jibing does not occur and the reuniting does not occur. sent13: that the antiferromagnetism does not occur but the stinting occlusion happens is not true if the hunter occurs. sent14: the stinting occlusion does not occur if that the antiferromagnetism does not occur but the stinting occlusion occurs does not hold. sent15: both the stinting Albugo and the Franciscanness happens. sent16: the jibing does not occur. sent17: the hunter occurs. sent18: the wiretap and the innocent occurs. sent19: if the fact that the fact that not the release but the climb happens is correct does not hold the reuniting does not occur. sent20: the travelogue occurs and the accomplishing happens. sent21: if the hunter does not occur the antiferromagnetism does not occur. sent22: both the geophysicalness and the combining happens. sent23: the retracting does not occur if the stinting Oligocene does not occur. sent24: the mistreatment occurs. sent25: if the judo does not occur and the wrestling guerdon does not occur the phlebectomy does not occur. sent26: the climbing occurs and the humming happens if the pronominalness does not occur. sent27: if the innocent does not occur the fact that the stinting occlusion happens and the mistreatment occurs is not correct.
sent8 -> int1: the judo occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stinting Oligocene happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the judo and the stinting Oligocene happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the wiretaping does not occur.; sent18 -> int4: the wiretaping happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the stinting Oligocene does not occur is right.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: that the fact that the retracting occurs is false is not false.; sent13 & sent17 -> int8: the fact that the antiferromagnetism does not occur and the stinting occlusion happens is incorrect.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the stinting occlusion does not occur.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: both the impairment and the mistreatment happens.; int10 -> int11: the impairment occurs.; int7 & int11 -> int12: not the retracting but the impairment occurs.; int12 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the phlebectomy does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the phlebectomy happens is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the visit happens. sent2: if the retracting does not occur and the impairment occurs then the phlebectomy occurs. sent3: that the mistreatment does not occur causes that the retracting does not occur or that the impairment does not occur or both. sent4: the wrestling guerdon occurs. sent5: that the mistreatment occurs is caused by that the stinting occlusion does not occur. sent6: the innocent occurs. sent7: the wiretap does not occur if both the judo and the stinting Oligocene occurs. sent8: the judo happens and the wrestling guerdon occurs. sent9: that the impairment and the mistreatment occurs is brought about by that the stinting occlusion does not occur. sent10: the doublesness happens. sent11: the howling theogony does not occur. sent12: that the innocentness occurs is prevented by that the jibing does not occur and the reuniting does not occur. sent13: that the antiferromagnetism does not occur but the stinting occlusion happens is not true if the hunter occurs. sent14: the stinting occlusion does not occur if that the antiferromagnetism does not occur but the stinting occlusion occurs does not hold. sent15: both the stinting Albugo and the Franciscanness happens. sent16: the jibing does not occur. sent17: the hunter occurs. sent18: the wiretap and the innocent occurs. sent19: if the fact that the fact that not the release but the climb happens is correct does not hold the reuniting does not occur. sent20: the travelogue occurs and the accomplishing happens. sent21: if the hunter does not occur the antiferromagnetism does not occur. sent22: both the geophysicalness and the combining happens. sent23: the retracting does not occur if the stinting Oligocene does not occur. sent24: the mistreatment occurs. sent25: if the judo does not occur and the wrestling guerdon does not occur the phlebectomy does not occur. sent26: the climbing occurs and the humming happens if the pronominalness does not occur. sent27: if the innocent does not occur the fact that the stinting occlusion happens and the mistreatment occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the judo occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stinting Oligocene happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the judo and the stinting Oligocene happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the wiretaping does not occur.; sent18 -> int4: the wiretaping happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the stinting Oligocene does not occur is right.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: that the fact that the retracting occurs is false is not false.; sent13 & sent17 -> int8: the fact that the antiferromagnetism does not occur and the stinting occlusion happens is incorrect.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the stinting occlusion does not occur.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: both the impairment and the mistreatment happens.; int10 -> int11: the impairment occurs.; int7 & int11 -> int12: not the retracting but the impairment occurs.; int12 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__