there exists something such that if that it is unpunctual and does not prey geophagy is incorrect it is impenetrable.
sent1: there is something such that if it is horse-drawn it is Pythagorean. sent2: the jasmine is dynastic if that it is both a discursiveness and not impenetrable is incorrect. sent3: that the jasmine is impenetrable hold if it is not punctual and does not prey geophagy. sent4: the daguerreotype is a kind of an alley if that it corsets daguerreotype and it is not Marian does not hold. sent5: a non-punctual thing that does not prey geophagy is not impenetrable. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not punctual and does not prey geophagy then it is impenetrable is not wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if it is nonhuman it is a kind of a mound. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the jasmine is unpunctual thing that preys geophagy is not true is not incorrect then it is impenetrable. sent9: if the fact that something is not punctual but it does prey geophagy is not true then it is impenetrable. sent10: if the jasmine is punctual then that it is impenetrable is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is unpunctual and does not prey geophagy is incorrect it is impenetrable. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is horse-drawn it is Pythagorean. sent2: the jasmine is dynastic if that it is both a discursiveness and not impenetrable is incorrect. sent3: that the jasmine is impenetrable hold if it is not punctual and does not prey geophagy. sent4: the daguerreotype is a kind of an alley if that it corsets daguerreotype and it is not Marian does not hold. sent5: a non-punctual thing that does not prey geophagy is not impenetrable. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not punctual and does not prey geophagy then it is impenetrable is not wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if it is nonhuman it is a kind of a mound. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the jasmine is unpunctual thing that preys geophagy is not true is not incorrect then it is impenetrable. sent9: if the fact that something is not punctual but it does prey geophagy is not true then it is impenetrable. sent10: if the jasmine is punctual then that it is impenetrable is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__