the fact that if that the cider lambs blameworthiness is not false that the fact that the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a geologist is not wrong is not correct does not hold.
sent1: if the cider lambs blameworthiness the eatage adducts sitter. sent2: if the eatage does adduct sitter then the hydathode does not turn sporophyte and is a geologist. sent3: the fact that the hydathode turns sporophyte and is a kind of a geologist is wrong if the cider lambs blameworthiness. sent4: that the hydathode does not turn sporophyte and adducts sitter does not hold if the cider lambs blameworthiness. sent5: if the cider lambs blameworthiness then the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a kind of a geologist. sent6: that something does turn sporophyte and it does lamb blameworthiness is false if that it does not adduct sitter is correct. sent7: the cider does not adduct sitter and aurifies if it is not a kind of a confederation. sent8: the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a kind of a geologist. sent9: if something does not lamb blameworthiness the fact that it is not a kind of a famine and it is a geologist is not true. sent10: that the fact that the hydathode does turn sporophyte and is a kind of a geologist is incorrect is not wrong if the eatage does adduct sitter. sent11: the fact that the hydathode does turn sporophyte and it is a geologist is not right. sent12: if that the eatage adducts sitter is not false the fact that the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a geologist is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cider does lamb blameworthiness.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the eatage does adduct sitter is right.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a kind of a geologist is false.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the rabato is not a famine but it is a geologist is not correct.
sent9 -> int3: if the rabato does not lamb blameworthiness that it is not a famine and it is a kind of a geologist does not hold.; sent6 -> int4: if the cider does not adduct sitter then the fact that it turns sporophyte and lambs blameworthiness is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the cider lambs blameworthiness is not false that the fact that the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a geologist is not wrong is not correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cider lambs blameworthiness the eatage adducts sitter. sent2: if the eatage does adduct sitter then the hydathode does not turn sporophyte and is a geologist. sent3: the fact that the hydathode turns sporophyte and is a kind of a geologist is wrong if the cider lambs blameworthiness. sent4: that the hydathode does not turn sporophyte and adducts sitter does not hold if the cider lambs blameworthiness. sent5: if the cider lambs blameworthiness then the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a kind of a geologist. sent6: that something does turn sporophyte and it does lamb blameworthiness is false if that it does not adduct sitter is correct. sent7: the cider does not adduct sitter and aurifies if it is not a kind of a confederation. sent8: the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a kind of a geologist. sent9: if something does not lamb blameworthiness the fact that it is not a kind of a famine and it is a geologist is not true. sent10: that the fact that the hydathode does turn sporophyte and is a kind of a geologist is incorrect is not wrong if the eatage does adduct sitter. sent11: the fact that the hydathode does turn sporophyte and it is a geologist is not right. sent12: if that the eatage adducts sitter is not false the fact that the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a geologist is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cider does lamb blameworthiness.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the eatage does adduct sitter is right.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the hydathode does not turn sporophyte but it is a kind of a geologist is false.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__