the airway is not a Brunswick.
sent1: the idolater is not a kind of a Brunswick if there exists something such that the fact that it is ohmic and a Brunswick does not hold. sent2: the fact that the onyx does redden combativeness is not wrong. sent3: if something is not a kind of a dobra then it does redden combativeness and is ohmic. sent4: something is not a dobra if the fact that it does not shine nave and does coat tweeter does not hold. sent5: there is something such that that it is ohmic and reddens combativeness is false. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a dobra and it does redden combativeness does not hold. sent7: the airway is not a write-off. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Brunswick and it is ohmic. sent9: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it reddens combativeness and it is a Brunswick is right is wrong. sent10: the fact that something is a dobra that does redden combativeness hold. sent11: the cordwood reddens onyx if it is Pakistani. sent12: the airway is not otic if that the fact that the idolater is both nihilistic and otic is not incorrect is incorrect. sent13: the idolater does not redden combativeness if there is something such that it does not redden combativeness. sent14: if the airway is not otic then the fact that it does not shine nave and it does coat tweeter is not right. sent15: if the idolater is not ohmic the airway is not a Brunswick. sent16: if there is something such that it is not empyrean then that the idolater is not empyrean is not incorrect. sent17: if the idolater is ohmic it reddens combativeness. sent18: if there is something such that that it does not redden combativeness hold then the airway does not redden combativeness. sent19: if the idolater is not a Brunswick then the airway is not ohmic. sent20: that the fact that the airway is not aphetic is true if there exists something such that it is not aphetic is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the idolater is ohmic.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the idolater reddens combativeness.;
that the airway is a Brunswick is correct.
sent3 -> int2: if the airway is not a dobra then it reddens combativeness and is ohmic.; sent4 -> int3: if that the airway does not shine nave but it coats tweeter is incorrect then it is not a dobra.;
$hypothesis$ = the airway is not a Brunswick. ; $context$ = sent1: the idolater is not a kind of a Brunswick if there exists something such that the fact that it is ohmic and a Brunswick does not hold. sent2: the fact that the onyx does redden combativeness is not wrong. sent3: if something is not a kind of a dobra then it does redden combativeness and is ohmic. sent4: something is not a dobra if the fact that it does not shine nave and does coat tweeter does not hold. sent5: there is something such that that it is ohmic and reddens combativeness is false. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a dobra and it does redden combativeness does not hold. sent7: the airway is not a write-off. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Brunswick and it is ohmic. sent9: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it reddens combativeness and it is a Brunswick is right is wrong. sent10: the fact that something is a dobra that does redden combativeness hold. sent11: the cordwood reddens onyx if it is Pakistani. sent12: the airway is not otic if that the fact that the idolater is both nihilistic and otic is not incorrect is incorrect. sent13: the idolater does not redden combativeness if there is something such that it does not redden combativeness. sent14: if the airway is not otic then the fact that it does not shine nave and it does coat tweeter is not right. sent15: if the idolater is not ohmic the airway is not a Brunswick. sent16: if there is something such that it is not empyrean then that the idolater is not empyrean is not incorrect. sent17: if the idolater is ohmic it reddens combativeness. sent18: if there is something such that that it does not redden combativeness hold then the airway does not redden combativeness. sent19: if the idolater is not a Brunswick then the airway is not ohmic. sent20: that the fact that the airway is not aphetic is true if there exists something such that it is not aphetic is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the idolater is ohmic.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the idolater reddens combativeness.; __UNKNOWN__