the shoot is not a Ascension.
sent1: the sangapenum is autoimmune. sent2: if something is not a rum or is a kind of a Brahmi or both it is not astrophysical. sent3: that the sangapenum is not a kind of a Ascension is right. sent4: the sangapenum is not pyrotechnics and/or is hipless. sent5: the shoot fears rum and/or it is an impressionist. sent6: something that is not impressionist or pyrotechnics or both is not astrophysical. sent7: if the shoot does not fear Rosa the fact that it is not astrophysical is not wrong. sent8: if the shoot is not a kind of a rum then it is not a kind of a Ascension. sent9: if that the sangapenum is not an impressionist and/or it is pyrotechnics is wrong then that the nighthawk is a kind of a Brahmi is correct. sent10: the sangapenum is not pyrotechnics if it is not an impressionist or it is a Ascension or both. sent11: the shoot is not a rum if something is both autoimmune and not astrophysical. sent12: the sangapenum either is a rum or is pyrotechnics or both. sent13: something is both an impressionist and not a Ascension. sent14: either the sangapenum is impressionist or it is pyrotechnics or both. sent15: the nighthawk is not autoimmune if there is something such that the fact that it is not astrophysical and it is autoimmune is incorrect. sent16: the shoot is autoimmune.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the sangapenum is not an impressionist or it is not non-pyrotechnics or both is false hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the nighthawk is a Brahmi.; sent6 -> int2: if the sangapenum is not impressionist or it is pyrotechnics or both it is not astrophysical.;
the nighthawk is not autoimmune.
$hypothesis$ = the shoot is not a Ascension. ; $context$ = sent1: the sangapenum is autoimmune. sent2: if something is not a rum or is a kind of a Brahmi or both it is not astrophysical. sent3: that the sangapenum is not a kind of a Ascension is right. sent4: the sangapenum is not pyrotechnics and/or is hipless. sent5: the shoot fears rum and/or it is an impressionist. sent6: something that is not impressionist or pyrotechnics or both is not astrophysical. sent7: if the shoot does not fear Rosa the fact that it is not astrophysical is not wrong. sent8: if the shoot is not a kind of a rum then it is not a kind of a Ascension. sent9: if that the sangapenum is not an impressionist and/or it is pyrotechnics is wrong then that the nighthawk is a kind of a Brahmi is correct. sent10: the sangapenum is not pyrotechnics if it is not an impressionist or it is a Ascension or both. sent11: the shoot is not a rum if something is both autoimmune and not astrophysical. sent12: the sangapenum either is a rum or is pyrotechnics or both. sent13: something is both an impressionist and not a Ascension. sent14: either the sangapenum is impressionist or it is pyrotechnics or both. sent15: the nighthawk is not autoimmune if there is something such that the fact that it is not astrophysical and it is autoimmune is incorrect. sent16: the shoot is autoimmune. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the sangapenum is not an impressionist or it is not non-pyrotechnics or both is false hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the nighthawk is a Brahmi.; sent6 -> int2: if the sangapenum is not impressionist or it is pyrotechnics or both it is not astrophysical.; __UNKNOWN__