the newt is a Caucasian.
sent1: the newt is not collapsible if the fact that it is not a kind of a Caucasian is not true. sent2: the fact that the chelation is a Malva but not noncollapsible is correct if it is a araroba. sent3: if that something is not a move and not Caucasian does not hold then it does subtilize combining. sent4: if the lamprey is not a kind of a Clay then the vizier does not subtilize combining. sent5: if that the chelation is not a palliative hold then the lamprey is not limnological or it is a palliative or both. sent6: the chelation is a araroba. sent7: if the fact that something is not a move and it is not gnostic does not hold then it is Caucasian. sent8: if something is a Malva and is not noncollapsible it is not a kind of a palliative. sent9: the chelation is both a Malva and not a palliative if it is limnological. sent10: if something is not limnological or it is a palliative or both it is not a Clay. sent11: that the newt is not a move and is not gnostic is not true if the vizier does not subtilize combining. sent12: the fact that the cingulum is not a Clay and not a literalism is not right. sent13: the vizier is not a Clay. sent14: the vizier is a palliative. sent15: something is a araroba if the fact that it is not gnostic and it is not a kind of a Caucasian is not true. sent16: something is not a Caucasian and it is not a Clay if it is a kind of a palliative.
sent8 -> int1: the chelation is not a palliative if the fact that it is a Malva and it is not noncollapsible hold.; sent2 & sent6 -> int2: the chelation is a kind of a Malva but it is not noncollapsible.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chelation is not a kind of a palliative.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the lamprey is not limnological or it is a kind of a palliative or both.; sent10 -> int5: the lamprey is not a Clay if either it is not limnological or it is a palliative or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lamprey is not a Clay.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the vizier does not subtilize combining.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that the newt is not a move and is not gnostic is not right.; sent7 -> int9: if that the newt is not a move and it is not gnostic is not correct then the fact that it is a Caucasian is correct.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the newt is not Caucasian.
sent16 -> int10: the newt is not a Caucasian and is not a Clay if that it is a kind of a palliative is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the newt is a Caucasian. ; $context$ = sent1: the newt is not collapsible if the fact that it is not a kind of a Caucasian is not true. sent2: the fact that the chelation is a Malva but not noncollapsible is correct if it is a araroba. sent3: if that something is not a move and not Caucasian does not hold then it does subtilize combining. sent4: if the lamprey is not a kind of a Clay then the vizier does not subtilize combining. sent5: if that the chelation is not a palliative hold then the lamprey is not limnological or it is a palliative or both. sent6: the chelation is a araroba. sent7: if the fact that something is not a move and it is not gnostic does not hold then it is Caucasian. sent8: if something is a Malva and is not noncollapsible it is not a kind of a palliative. sent9: the chelation is both a Malva and not a palliative if it is limnological. sent10: if something is not limnological or it is a palliative or both it is not a Clay. sent11: that the newt is not a move and is not gnostic is not true if the vizier does not subtilize combining. sent12: the fact that the cingulum is not a Clay and not a literalism is not right. sent13: the vizier is not a Clay. sent14: the vizier is a palliative. sent15: something is a araroba if the fact that it is not gnostic and it is not a kind of a Caucasian is not true. sent16: something is not a Caucasian and it is not a Clay if it is a kind of a palliative. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the chelation is not a palliative if the fact that it is a Malva and it is not noncollapsible hold.; sent2 & sent6 -> int2: the chelation is a kind of a Malva but it is not noncollapsible.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chelation is not a kind of a palliative.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the lamprey is not limnological or it is a kind of a palliative or both.; sent10 -> int5: the lamprey is not a Clay if either it is not limnological or it is a palliative or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lamprey is not a Clay.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the vizier does not subtilize combining.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that the newt is not a move and is not gnostic is not right.; sent7 -> int9: if that the newt is not a move and it is not gnostic is not correct then the fact that it is a Caucasian is correct.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__