the consummating occurs.
sent1: the whiff and the non-implicitness happens if that the immorality does not occur is correct. sent2: the Hertzianness happens. sent3: the consummating does not occur if the fact that not the undramaticness but the consummating occurs is not correct. sent4: the firewall does not occur. sent5: the incitation does not occur. sent6: if the whiff and the non-implicitness occurs the consummating happens. sent7: the touchdown happens if the skimming spillage happens. sent8: the crackdown and the skimming spillage occurs. sent9: if the Hertzianness occurs and the undramaticness happens the touchdown does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undramaticness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Hertzianness and the undramaticness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the touchdown does not occur.; sent8 -> int3: the skimming spillage occurs.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the touchdown happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the undramaticness does not occur.;
the consummating does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the consummating occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the whiff and the non-implicitness happens if that the immorality does not occur is correct. sent2: the Hertzianness happens. sent3: the consummating does not occur if the fact that not the undramaticness but the consummating occurs is not correct. sent4: the firewall does not occur. sent5: the incitation does not occur. sent6: if the whiff and the non-implicitness occurs the consummating happens. sent7: the touchdown happens if the skimming spillage happens. sent8: the crackdown and the skimming spillage occurs. sent9: if the Hertzianness occurs and the undramaticness happens the touchdown does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undramaticness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Hertzianness and the undramaticness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the touchdown does not occur.; sent8 -> int3: the skimming spillage occurs.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the touchdown happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the undramaticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__