there exists something such that if it is not a Schistosomatidae then the fact that it is a firestone and is not a autodidact does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not twine bumptiousness then that it is a kind of a combustible that does not twine buffoonery is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the heath is a firestone and it is a autodidact is not right if it is not a kind of a Schistosomatidae. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a Schistosomatidae then the fact that it is a firestone and it is a autodidact does not hold. sent4: the fact that the heath is both a firestone and not a autodidact is incorrect if it is a Schistosomatidae. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a ornamentalism then it is neuroanatomic and not a voltmeter. sent6: if something is not nonprescription the fact that it is a Maldivian that is not a fireguard does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Schistosomatidae is not incorrect that it is a firestone and it is not a autodidact is not true. sent8: the fact that the heath is a tableau but it is not a kind of a ludo does not hold if it is not congenial. sent9: the heath is a firestone but it is not a autodidact if it is not a kind of a Schistosomatidae. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not grammatical then that it is a kind of a guarantor and it is unsexy is false. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a Schistosomatidae it is a firestone and it is not a autodidact. sent12: that there is something such that if it does not twine edict then the fact that it is binaural and it is not congenial is wrong is right. sent13: if something does not bypass woodworker that it is a firestone and prescription is incorrect. sent14: if the heath is not a Schistosomatidae then that it is a firestone and it is not a autodidact is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it does not swim it is parochial and it is not Slavonic. sent16: there is something such that if it is constitutional that it is a combustible and it is a minstrel is incorrect. sent17: the heath is a Schistosomatidae but it does not twine substantiality if it is not congenial. sent18: if the nonworker does not twine cocksucker then the fact that it twines cyprinid and it is not a autodidact does not hold. sent19: there is something such that if it does not twine buffoonery that it is grammatical and it is a rope is incorrect.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
that there is something such that if it is not nonprescription the fact that it is both a Maldivian and not a fireguard is incorrect is right.
sent6 -> int1: if the attar is not nonprescription that it is a Maldivian but not a fireguard is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a Schistosomatidae then the fact that it is a firestone and is not a autodidact does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not twine bumptiousness then that it is a kind of a combustible that does not twine buffoonery is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the heath is a firestone and it is a autodidact is not right if it is not a kind of a Schistosomatidae. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a Schistosomatidae then the fact that it is a firestone and it is a autodidact does not hold. sent4: the fact that the heath is both a firestone and not a autodidact is incorrect if it is a Schistosomatidae. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a ornamentalism then it is neuroanatomic and not a voltmeter. sent6: if something is not nonprescription the fact that it is a Maldivian that is not a fireguard does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Schistosomatidae is not incorrect that it is a firestone and it is not a autodidact is not true. sent8: the fact that the heath is a tableau but it is not a kind of a ludo does not hold if it is not congenial. sent9: the heath is a firestone but it is not a autodidact if it is not a kind of a Schistosomatidae. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not grammatical then that it is a kind of a guarantor and it is unsexy is false. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a Schistosomatidae it is a firestone and it is not a autodidact. sent12: that there is something such that if it does not twine edict then the fact that it is binaural and it is not congenial is wrong is right. sent13: if something does not bypass woodworker that it is a firestone and prescription is incorrect. sent14: if the heath is not a Schistosomatidae then that it is a firestone and it is not a autodidact is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it does not swim it is parochial and it is not Slavonic. sent16: there is something such that if it is constitutional that it is a combustible and it is a minstrel is incorrect. sent17: the heath is a Schistosomatidae but it does not twine substantiality if it is not congenial. sent18: if the nonworker does not twine cocksucker then the fact that it twines cyprinid and it is not a autodidact does not hold. sent19: there is something such that if it does not twine buffoonery that it is grammatical and it is a rope is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__