the comfrey does not misgive lysinemia.
sent1: the fact that the wharfage is not a clothesbrush hold if it does not misgive shark and/or is glacial. sent2: the cougar is not a kind of a capacitor if the comfrey misgives lysinemia and is Pacific. sent3: the wharfage misgives shark and/or is glacial. sent4: if something does not tabulate Cambridge it misgives lysinemia and it is a incurability. sent5: the comfrey does tabulate Cambridge. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is not a Pacific and it is a capacitor is not right then the fact that the cougar is a kind of a Pacific is not wrong. sent7: the fact that something does not tabulate Cambridge and is a kind of a Pacific does not hold if it does not misgive lysinemia. sent8: if the wharfage is a replaceability the cougar is a capacitor. sent9: if the fact that the wharfage is not a replaceability is correct that it is not Pacific but a capacitor is not true. sent10: something is not a replaceability if the fact that it is a kind of nonvolatile thing that is a clothesbrush is correct. sent11: the fact that the intercourse is a kind of a incurability is not incorrect. sent12: if the wharfage is volatile then that the cougar is a kind of a capacitor hold. sent13: the wharfage does not misgive shark and/or is glacial. sent14: that if that the wharfage does not tabulate Cambridge and is Pacific is not right the cougar is a kind of a incurability is not incorrect. sent15: something is not a kind of a capacitor and it does not misgive lysinemia if it is not a replaceability. sent16: if the fact that something is both not a incurability and a naught does not hold it is not a naught. sent17: everything does tabulate Cambridge. sent18: the fact that either the wharfage is a kind of a replaceability or it is the volatile or both if the wharfage is not a clothesbrush hold. sent19: something is Pacific if it is a incurability. sent20: the wharfage is not a kind of a clothesbrush if it does not misgive shark. sent21: everything is a incurability that does tabulate Cambridge. sent22: that the lasiocampid is not a incurability but it is a kind of a naught does not hold if there is something such that it is a incurability.
sent21 -> int1: the comfrey is a kind of a incurability that does tabulate Cambridge.; int1 -> int2: the comfrey is a incurability.; sent19 -> int3: if that the comfrey is a incurability hold it is Pacific.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the comfrey is Pacific.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the comfrey does misgive lysinemia.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the comfrey does misgive lysinemia and it is a kind of a Pacific.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the cougar is not a capacitor.; sent1 & sent13 -> int7: that the wharfage is not a kind of a clothesbrush is not incorrect.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the wharfage is a replaceability and/or volatile hold.; int8 & sent8 & sent12 -> int9: the cougar is a capacitor.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the lasiocampid is not a naught.
sent16 -> int11: if the fact that the lasiocampid is not a incurability but it is a naught is not right then that it is not a naught is not false.; sent7 -> int12: the fact that the wharfage does not tabulate Cambridge and is a Pacific is wrong if it does not misgive lysinemia.; sent15 -> int13: the wharfage is not a capacitor and it does not misgive lysinemia if it is not a kind of a replaceability.; sent10 -> int14: that the wharfage is not a replaceability is not wrong if it is not a volatile and it is a clothesbrush.;
$hypothesis$ = the comfrey does not misgive lysinemia. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the wharfage is not a clothesbrush hold if it does not misgive shark and/or is glacial. sent2: the cougar is not a kind of a capacitor if the comfrey misgives lysinemia and is Pacific. sent3: the wharfage misgives shark and/or is glacial. sent4: if something does not tabulate Cambridge it misgives lysinemia and it is a incurability. sent5: the comfrey does tabulate Cambridge. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is not a Pacific and it is a capacitor is not right then the fact that the cougar is a kind of a Pacific is not wrong. sent7: the fact that something does not tabulate Cambridge and is a kind of a Pacific does not hold if it does not misgive lysinemia. sent8: if the wharfage is a replaceability the cougar is a capacitor. sent9: if the fact that the wharfage is not a replaceability is correct that it is not Pacific but a capacitor is not true. sent10: something is not a replaceability if the fact that it is a kind of nonvolatile thing that is a clothesbrush is correct. sent11: the fact that the intercourse is a kind of a incurability is not incorrect. sent12: if the wharfage is volatile then that the cougar is a kind of a capacitor hold. sent13: the wharfage does not misgive shark and/or is glacial. sent14: that if that the wharfage does not tabulate Cambridge and is Pacific is not right the cougar is a kind of a incurability is not incorrect. sent15: something is not a kind of a capacitor and it does not misgive lysinemia if it is not a replaceability. sent16: if the fact that something is both not a incurability and a naught does not hold it is not a naught. sent17: everything does tabulate Cambridge. sent18: the fact that either the wharfage is a kind of a replaceability or it is the volatile or both if the wharfage is not a clothesbrush hold. sent19: something is Pacific if it is a incurability. sent20: the wharfage is not a kind of a clothesbrush if it does not misgive shark. sent21: everything is a incurability that does tabulate Cambridge. sent22: that the lasiocampid is not a incurability but it is a kind of a naught does not hold if there is something such that it is a incurability. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: the comfrey is a kind of a incurability that does tabulate Cambridge.; int1 -> int2: the comfrey is a incurability.; sent19 -> int3: if that the comfrey is a incurability hold it is Pacific.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the comfrey is Pacific.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the comfrey does misgive lysinemia.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the comfrey does misgive lysinemia and it is a kind of a Pacific.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the cougar is not a capacitor.; sent1 & sent13 -> int7: that the wharfage is not a kind of a clothesbrush is not incorrect.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the wharfage is a replaceability and/or volatile hold.; int8 & sent8 & sent12 -> int9: the cougar is a capacitor.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__