that the crottle hashes Lagothrix and it is a dangerousness is not right.
sent1: the gaff is not a kind of a dangerousness. sent2: the crottle is a drool if the gaff does not hash skybox. sent3: the gaff is not addictive. sent4: the don't-know is addictive. sent5: if the expanse is ostentatious but not an invalid then it is flowerless. sent6: the gaff is not a cheerlessness. sent7: if the verapamil does rack it is both not disintegrative and non-Catalan. sent8: if the crottle is a busload but not a Catalan it is a kind of a cheerlessness. sent9: if the Stalinist does hash skybox then the globetrotter hash skybox. sent10: that the crottle is both not a Bulnesia and a plover is true. sent11: the crottle is not a kind of a busload. sent12: if the crottle is a drool then it is not a busload. sent13: the crottle is a liked that does not oppose verapamil. sent14: the gaff is not colorful but it does accord clinid. sent15: something that is a drool is a kind of Catalan thing that is not a kind of a busload. sent16: if the crottle is a kind of Catalan thing that is not a busload then it does hash Lagothrix. sent17: the gaff does hash Lagothrix. sent18: if that the crottle is a kind of Catalan a busload is correct then it does hash Lagothrix. sent19: the crottle is a kind of a dangerousness. sent20: if the globetrotter does hash skybox then that the gaff is addictive is right. sent21: something is addictive and does not hash skybox if it is a drool. sent22: if the gaff is not a cheerlessness the fact that it is nonaddictive thing that hashes skybox is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gaff hashes skybox.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the gaff is not addictive but it hashes skybox.; sent22 & sent6 -> int2: that the gaff is not addictive and hashes skybox does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gaff does not hash skybox.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the crottle is a drool.; sent15 -> int6: the crottle is Catalan but it is not a busload if it is a drool.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the crottle is a kind of a Catalan but it is not a busload.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the crottle does hash Lagothrix.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the felucca is not a cheerlessness.
sent21 -> int9: the gaff is addictive but it does not hash skybox if it is a drool.;
$hypothesis$ = that the crottle hashes Lagothrix and it is a dangerousness is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the gaff is not a kind of a dangerousness. sent2: the crottle is a drool if the gaff does not hash skybox. sent3: the gaff is not addictive. sent4: the don't-know is addictive. sent5: if the expanse is ostentatious but not an invalid then it is flowerless. sent6: the gaff is not a cheerlessness. sent7: if the verapamil does rack it is both not disintegrative and non-Catalan. sent8: if the crottle is a busload but not a Catalan it is a kind of a cheerlessness. sent9: if the Stalinist does hash skybox then the globetrotter hash skybox. sent10: that the crottle is both not a Bulnesia and a plover is true. sent11: the crottle is not a kind of a busload. sent12: if the crottle is a drool then it is not a busload. sent13: the crottle is a liked that does not oppose verapamil. sent14: the gaff is not colorful but it does accord clinid. sent15: something that is a drool is a kind of Catalan thing that is not a kind of a busload. sent16: if the crottle is a kind of Catalan thing that is not a busload then it does hash Lagothrix. sent17: the gaff does hash Lagothrix. sent18: if that the crottle is a kind of Catalan a busload is correct then it does hash Lagothrix. sent19: the crottle is a kind of a dangerousness. sent20: if the globetrotter does hash skybox then that the gaff is addictive is right. sent21: something is addictive and does not hash skybox if it is a drool. sent22: if the gaff is not a cheerlessness the fact that it is nonaddictive thing that hashes skybox is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gaff hashes skybox.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the gaff is not addictive but it hashes skybox.; sent22 & sent6 -> int2: that the gaff is not addictive and hashes skybox does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gaff does not hash skybox.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the crottle is a drool.; sent15 -> int6: the crottle is Catalan but it is not a busload if it is a drool.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the crottle is a kind of a Catalan but it is not a busload.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the crottle does hash Lagothrix.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__