the Ute is not a Samanala.
sent1: if the lasso does not confine adobe it does prioritize essonite and is nonexistent. sent2: the freestone is not a gastropod if the lasso is xenogeneic thing that does persist nabob. sent3: if the freestone is not neuroendocrine the fact that the lasso does not confine adobe is not false. sent4: the parent is not consistent if there is something such that that it is not incalculable and it is not a azimuth is not correct. sent5: that the freestone is not a gastropod is not false if the lasso is not xenogeneic but it persists nabob. sent6: that the freestone does not scatter and is philosophical is incorrect. sent7: the lasso is non-xenogeneic if the parent is non-xenogeneic. sent8: there is something such that that it is incalculable and it is not a azimuth does not hold. sent9: if something is consistent the fact that it is a Samanala hold. sent10: the parent is not non-xenogeneic if it is not consistent. sent11: if the fact that something is not a scattering and is philosophical does not hold it is a scattering. sent12: there exists something such that it is non-self thing that is not a kind of a flophouse. sent13: the Ute is not a kind of a Samanala if there exists something such that it is a razorbill and is a kind of a scattering. sent14: that the lasso is consistent and it is xenogeneic does not hold. sent15: the fact that the parent is not non-xenogeneic and it does persist nabob is not correct. sent16: the incus is not non-Slavonic. sent17: if something is not a kind of a gastropod it is consistent and it is xenogeneic. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is not philosophical and it does persist nabob is false. sent19: something is a razorbill if the fact that it is not a gastropod is not wrong. sent20: if something is nonexistent then it is philosophical and it does not persist FSB. sent21: that the freestone is a scattering and philosophical does not hold. sent22: if the incus is Slavonic then the freestone persists stern and/or it is not neuroendocrine. sent23: if the lasso is philosophical but it does not persist FSB the parent scatters. sent24: if the freestone does persist stern then the lasso does not confine adobe. sent25: if the parent is xenogeneic then the lasso is not xenogeneic and does persist nabob.
sent19 -> int1: if the freestone is not a gastropod it is a kind of a razorbill.; sent11 -> int2: the freestone scatters if the fact that it does not scatters and it is philosophical is not true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the freestone scatters.;
the Ute is a kind of a Samanala.
sent9 -> int4: if the Ute is consistent it is a Samanala.; sent17 -> int5: the Ute is a kind of consistent thing that is xenogeneic if it is not a gastropod.; sent20 -> int6: if the lasso is nonexistent the fact that it is philosophical and it does not persist FSB is correct.; sent22 & sent16 -> int7: either the freestone does persist stern or it is not neuroendocrine or both.; int7 & sent24 & sent3 -> int8: the fact that the lasso does not confine adobe is not incorrect.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the lasso prioritizes essonite and is nonexistent.; int9 -> int10: the lasso is nonexistent.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the lasso is philosophical but it does not persist FSB.; sent23 & int11 -> int12: the parent does scatter.;
$hypothesis$ = the Ute is not a Samanala. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lasso does not confine adobe it does prioritize essonite and is nonexistent. sent2: the freestone is not a gastropod if the lasso is xenogeneic thing that does persist nabob. sent3: if the freestone is not neuroendocrine the fact that the lasso does not confine adobe is not false. sent4: the parent is not consistent if there is something such that that it is not incalculable and it is not a azimuth is not correct. sent5: that the freestone is not a gastropod is not false if the lasso is not xenogeneic but it persists nabob. sent6: that the freestone does not scatter and is philosophical is incorrect. sent7: the lasso is non-xenogeneic if the parent is non-xenogeneic. sent8: there is something such that that it is incalculable and it is not a azimuth does not hold. sent9: if something is consistent the fact that it is a Samanala hold. sent10: the parent is not non-xenogeneic if it is not consistent. sent11: if the fact that something is not a scattering and is philosophical does not hold it is a scattering. sent12: there exists something such that it is non-self thing that is not a kind of a flophouse. sent13: the Ute is not a kind of a Samanala if there exists something such that it is a razorbill and is a kind of a scattering. sent14: that the lasso is consistent and it is xenogeneic does not hold. sent15: the fact that the parent is not non-xenogeneic and it does persist nabob is not correct. sent16: the incus is not non-Slavonic. sent17: if something is not a kind of a gastropod it is consistent and it is xenogeneic. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is not philosophical and it does persist nabob is false. sent19: something is a razorbill if the fact that it is not a gastropod is not wrong. sent20: if something is nonexistent then it is philosophical and it does not persist FSB. sent21: that the freestone is a scattering and philosophical does not hold. sent22: if the incus is Slavonic then the freestone persists stern and/or it is not neuroendocrine. sent23: if the lasso is philosophical but it does not persist FSB the parent scatters. sent24: if the freestone does persist stern then the lasso does not confine adobe. sent25: if the parent is xenogeneic then the lasso is not xenogeneic and does persist nabob. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: if the freestone is not a gastropod it is a kind of a razorbill.; sent11 -> int2: the freestone scatters if the fact that it does not scatters and it is philosophical is not true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the freestone scatters.; __UNKNOWN__