the defoliation does remove oilstove and spring-cleans celestite.
sent1: if the defoliation is not crystalline that it is not a kind of a skank and it is not a kind of a chukker is not right. sent2: the defoliation is a bubbliness and it does spring-clean prairie. sent3: the prairie does not remove oilstove and is a kind of a bubbliness if it does not spring-clean prairie. sent4: the cuttlefish is not a downtown if it is a kind of a Ephesians. sent5: if that the defoliation is non-crystalline thing that does not spring-clean prairie is incorrect the prairie does not spring-clean prairie. sent6: that the cuttlefish is a chukker is not false. sent7: something does not sonnet americium and does not consecrate if it sonnets nepotism. sent8: the cuttlefish is not a downtown. sent9: if something does not remove oilstove then it is not Ephesians or it does spring-clean celestite or both. sent10: the prairie does not spring-clean celestite if the fact that the cuttlefish is not a Ephesians is true. sent11: the cuttlefish removes oilstove. sent12: if the prairie does not spring-clean celestite then the defoliation does remove oilstove and it spring-clean celestite. sent13: the bun does not dance granny. sent14: the prairie is a downtown. sent15: the fact that something is not crystalline and does not spring-clean prairie is not true if it is not a skank. sent16: something is a chukker if the fact that it is not a skank and is not a kind of a chukker is not correct. sent17: if something is both a bubbliness and a chukker then it is not a kind of a Ephesians. sent18: something does dance granny but it is not a downtown if that it is a kind of a Ephesians is not wrong. sent19: the dart sonnets nepotism if it is a current and it does not shriek. sent20: the defoliation is not a skank if the dart does not sonnet americium and it does not consecrate. sent21: the defoliation is a kind of a chukker. sent22: if something that does dance granny is not a downtown it is not a chukker. sent23: the dart is a current but it does not shriek.
sent18 -> int1: that the cuttlefish does dance granny but it is not a downtown is not incorrect if it is a kind of a Ephesians.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cuttlefish is a Ephesians.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cuttlefish does dance granny and is not a downtown.; sent22 -> int3: if the cuttlefish dances granny and is not a downtown then it is not a chukker.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cuttlefish is not a chukker.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cuttlefish is not a Ephesians.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the prairie does not spring-clean celestite.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the defoliation does remove oilstove and it spring-cleans celestite is not true.
sent17 -> int8: the defoliation is not a Ephesians if it is a bubbliness and it is a chukker.; sent2 -> int9: the defoliation is a kind of a bubbliness.; sent16 -> int10: if the fact that the defoliation is not a skank and not a chukker does not hold it is a kind of a chukker.;
$hypothesis$ = the defoliation does remove oilstove and spring-cleans celestite. ; $context$ = sent1: if the defoliation is not crystalline that it is not a kind of a skank and it is not a kind of a chukker is not right. sent2: the defoliation is a bubbliness and it does spring-clean prairie. sent3: the prairie does not remove oilstove and is a kind of a bubbliness if it does not spring-clean prairie. sent4: the cuttlefish is not a downtown if it is a kind of a Ephesians. sent5: if that the defoliation is non-crystalline thing that does not spring-clean prairie is incorrect the prairie does not spring-clean prairie. sent6: that the cuttlefish is a chukker is not false. sent7: something does not sonnet americium and does not consecrate if it sonnets nepotism. sent8: the cuttlefish is not a downtown. sent9: if something does not remove oilstove then it is not Ephesians or it does spring-clean celestite or both. sent10: the prairie does not spring-clean celestite if the fact that the cuttlefish is not a Ephesians is true. sent11: the cuttlefish removes oilstove. sent12: if the prairie does not spring-clean celestite then the defoliation does remove oilstove and it spring-clean celestite. sent13: the bun does not dance granny. sent14: the prairie is a downtown. sent15: the fact that something is not crystalline and does not spring-clean prairie is not true if it is not a skank. sent16: something is a chukker if the fact that it is not a skank and is not a kind of a chukker is not correct. sent17: if something is both a bubbliness and a chukker then it is not a kind of a Ephesians. sent18: something does dance granny but it is not a downtown if that it is a kind of a Ephesians is not wrong. sent19: the dart sonnets nepotism if it is a current and it does not shriek. sent20: the defoliation is not a skank if the dart does not sonnet americium and it does not consecrate. sent21: the defoliation is a kind of a chukker. sent22: if something that does dance granny is not a downtown it is not a chukker. sent23: the dart is a current but it does not shriek. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: that the cuttlefish does dance granny but it is not a downtown is not incorrect if it is a kind of a Ephesians.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cuttlefish is a Ephesians.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cuttlefish does dance granny and is not a downtown.; sent22 -> int3: if the cuttlefish dances granny and is not a downtown then it is not a chukker.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cuttlefish is not a chukker.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cuttlefish is not a Ephesians.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the prairie does not spring-clean celestite.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__