there is something such that if that it is nonparametric hold then the fact that it unfolds and it is not diametric is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is nonparametric that it unfolds and it is not non-diametric is not right. sent2: the puffing is not nonparametric if it unfolds and it is diametric. sent3: there exists something such that if it Frenchifies gadgeteer that it is a caregiver and it does interpolate is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is nonparametric it unfolds and it is not diametric. sent5: the puffing is not diametric. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a maltha and it is not noncombustible is wrong the chlorthalidone is a kind of a maltha. sent7: the fact that the puffing unfolds and it is diametric is not true if it is nonparametric. sent8: that the puffing unfolds and it is diametric does not hold. sent9: the colored is not addictive if it unfolds and it is a lecanopteris. sent10: that the puffing does unfold is not wrong. sent11: if the puffing unfolds then the fact that it is a lividity and does interpolate does not hold. sent12: if something does unfold and is not diametric the fact that it is not nonparametric is not false. sent13: if the puffing is nonparametric it does unfold and is not diametric. sent14: if that the radon is not pharyngeal is not wrong then the fact that it is not a maltha and not noncombustible does not hold. sent15: the radon is not pharyngeal and it is not Thoreauvian.
sent12 -> int1: if the puffing does unfold but it is not diametric then it is not nonparametric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the puffing does unfold but it is not diametric.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the puffing is not nonparametric.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the puffing is nonparametric.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the puffing does unfold and is not diametric is incorrect.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the puffing unfolds but it is not diametric is not right if the fact that it is nonparametric hold.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the puffing is not filarial.
sent15 -> int6: the radon is not pharyngeal.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: that the radon is not a maltha and not noncombustible is not true.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is not a maltha and not noncombustible does not hold.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the chlorthalidone is a maltha.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a maltha.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is nonparametric hold then the fact that it unfolds and it is not diametric is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is nonparametric that it unfolds and it is not non-diametric is not right. sent2: the puffing is not nonparametric if it unfolds and it is diametric. sent3: there exists something such that if it Frenchifies gadgeteer that it is a caregiver and it does interpolate is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is nonparametric it unfolds and it is not diametric. sent5: the puffing is not diametric. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a maltha and it is not noncombustible is wrong the chlorthalidone is a kind of a maltha. sent7: the fact that the puffing unfolds and it is diametric is not true if it is nonparametric. sent8: that the puffing unfolds and it is diametric does not hold. sent9: the colored is not addictive if it unfolds and it is a lecanopteris. sent10: that the puffing does unfold is not wrong. sent11: if the puffing unfolds then the fact that it is a lividity and does interpolate does not hold. sent12: if something does unfold and is not diametric the fact that it is not nonparametric is not false. sent13: if the puffing is nonparametric it does unfold and is not diametric. sent14: if that the radon is not pharyngeal is not wrong then the fact that it is not a maltha and not noncombustible does not hold. sent15: the radon is not pharyngeal and it is not Thoreauvian. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the puffing does unfold but it is not diametric then it is not nonparametric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the puffing does unfold but it is not diametric.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the puffing is not nonparametric.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the puffing is nonparametric.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the puffing does unfold and is not diametric is incorrect.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the puffing unfolds but it is not diametric is not right if the fact that it is nonparametric hold.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__