there exists something such that if the fact that the fact that it is a curmudgeon that does not soothe hold is not true it does not define.
sent1: if that the dispenser is both a curmudgeon and not a poke is incorrect then it is not basilar. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a curmudgeon it does not define. sent3: there is something such that if it does soothe it does not define. sent4: the dispenser does not define if it is a kind of a curmudgeon and it does not soothe. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a curmudgeon and does not soothe hold is incorrect then it defines. sent6: there exists something such that if that the fact that it is both a pentahedron and not introversive is right is incorrect then it is not irreverent. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Jacobi that is not a Kimberley does not hold then it is not crural. sent8: something does not riposte Crane if the fact that it is a kind of pessimistic thing that is not branchiate is not true. sent9: there is something such that if it is a curmudgeon and it does not soothe then it does not define. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a curmudgeon and it does soothe is not correct it does not define. sent11: if the fact that the dispenser is a curmudgeon and does not soothe is not correct it does not define. sent12: if that the dispenser is a kind of a curmudgeon that does not soothe does not hold it does define. sent13: that something does not triangulate if the fact that it does riposte Dipsosaurus and it is not nonsuppurative is not correct is right. sent14: the dispenser does not define if that it is a kind of a curmudgeon that soothes is not true. sent15: the dispenser does not define if the fact that it is not a kind of a curmudgeon is not wrong. sent16: if that the fact that the Crane is both a ganoin and not phrenological is not incorrect is not right it does soothe.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is pessimistic and it is not branchiate does not hold it does not riposte Crane.
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the leaf-roller is pessimistic but it is not branchiate is wrong it does not riposte Crane.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that the fact that it is a curmudgeon that does not soothe hold is not true it does not define. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the dispenser is both a curmudgeon and not a poke is incorrect then it is not basilar. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a curmudgeon it does not define. sent3: there is something such that if it does soothe it does not define. sent4: the dispenser does not define if it is a kind of a curmudgeon and it does not soothe. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a curmudgeon and does not soothe hold is incorrect then it defines. sent6: there exists something such that if that the fact that it is both a pentahedron and not introversive is right is incorrect then it is not irreverent. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Jacobi that is not a Kimberley does not hold then it is not crural. sent8: something does not riposte Crane if the fact that it is a kind of pessimistic thing that is not branchiate is not true. sent9: there is something such that if it is a curmudgeon and it does not soothe then it does not define. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a curmudgeon and it does soothe is not correct it does not define. sent11: if the fact that the dispenser is a curmudgeon and does not soothe is not correct it does not define. sent12: if that the dispenser is a kind of a curmudgeon that does not soothe does not hold it does define. sent13: that something does not triangulate if the fact that it does riposte Dipsosaurus and it is not nonsuppurative is not correct is right. sent14: the dispenser does not define if that it is a kind of a curmudgeon that soothes is not true. sent15: the dispenser does not define if the fact that it is not a kind of a curmudgeon is not wrong. sent16: if that the fact that the Crane is both a ganoin and not phrenological is not incorrect is not right it does soothe. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__