the fact that there is something such that it does not embrown paisa and it is gymnastics does not hold.
sent1: that the Babylonian is not non-gymnastics and it does consume is wrong. sent2: if the Babylonian is not a Macropus it does not consume. sent3: something is not a kind of a Macropus if it is not untheatrical. sent4: the fact that the maleberry is a diesel-hydraulic but it does not embrown paisa is not true. sent5: something is not a kind of a phonogram. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a discernment. sent7: the poorhouse is a Russian. sent8: the Babylonian does consume if the maleberry is a Russian. sent9: something is not basiscopic and is nonspatial. sent10: the antacid does not grapple and is a Russian. sent11: the fact that the Babylonian does not consume if a basiscopic thing is nonspatial is not incorrect. sent12: if the poorhouse is not a Russian then it does not embrown paisa. sent13: if the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a diesel-hydraulic and is not a kind of a Macropus is right does not hold it is Russian. sent14: the percher is Russian if the maleberry is a kind of a Macropus. sent15: something does embrown paisa if that it is a Macropus and it does not embrown paisa is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the percher is a kind of a Macropus that is gymnastics is not correct. sent17: the Babylonian does not consume if a non-basiscopic thing is nonspatial. sent18: the Babylonian consumes if that it is untheatrical and it is not a kind of a Russian does not hold. sent19: the poorhouse is basiscopic. sent20: that the maleberry is a diesel-hydraulic but it is not a Macropus is not true if the percher is not a Macropus. sent21: if that the poorhouse does not embrown paisa and is gymnastics is false the percher is not untheatrical. sent22: something does prowl and it tyrannizes biome. sent23: something consumes and is a kind of a Russian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the poorhouse does not embrown paisa but it is gymnastics does not hold.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the percher is not untheatrical.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the percher is not a kind of the Macropus if the fact that the percher is not untheatrical is not wrong hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the percher is not a kind of a Macropus hold.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: that the maleberry is a diesel-hydraulic but it is not a Macropus is not true.; sent13 -> int5: if that the maleberry is a kind of a diesel-hydraulic and is not a kind of a Macropus does not hold it is a kind of a Russian.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the maleberry is a Russian.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Babylonian does consume.; sent9 & sent17 -> int8: the Babylonian does not consume.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the poorhouse does not embrown paisa but it is gymnastics.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the maleberry does embrown paisa.
sent15 -> int11: if that the maleberry is a Macropus and does not embrown paisa does not hold then the fact that it embrown paisa is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it does not embrown paisa and it is gymnastics does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Babylonian is not non-gymnastics and it does consume is wrong. sent2: if the Babylonian is not a Macropus it does not consume. sent3: something is not a kind of a Macropus if it is not untheatrical. sent4: the fact that the maleberry is a diesel-hydraulic but it does not embrown paisa is not true. sent5: something is not a kind of a phonogram. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a discernment. sent7: the poorhouse is a Russian. sent8: the Babylonian does consume if the maleberry is a Russian. sent9: something is not basiscopic and is nonspatial. sent10: the antacid does not grapple and is a Russian. sent11: the fact that the Babylonian does not consume if a basiscopic thing is nonspatial is not incorrect. sent12: if the poorhouse is not a Russian then it does not embrown paisa. sent13: if the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a diesel-hydraulic and is not a kind of a Macropus is right does not hold it is Russian. sent14: the percher is Russian if the maleberry is a kind of a Macropus. sent15: something does embrown paisa if that it is a Macropus and it does not embrown paisa is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the percher is a kind of a Macropus that is gymnastics is not correct. sent17: the Babylonian does not consume if a non-basiscopic thing is nonspatial. sent18: the Babylonian consumes if that it is untheatrical and it is not a kind of a Russian does not hold. sent19: the poorhouse is basiscopic. sent20: that the maleberry is a diesel-hydraulic but it is not a Macropus is not true if the percher is not a Macropus. sent21: if that the poorhouse does not embrown paisa and is gymnastics is false the percher is not untheatrical. sent22: something does prowl and it tyrannizes biome. sent23: something consumes and is a kind of a Russian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the poorhouse does not embrown paisa but it is gymnastics does not hold.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the percher is not untheatrical.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the percher is not a kind of the Macropus if the fact that the percher is not untheatrical is not wrong hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the percher is not a kind of a Macropus hold.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: that the maleberry is a diesel-hydraulic but it is not a Macropus is not true.; sent13 -> int5: if that the maleberry is a kind of a diesel-hydraulic and is not a kind of a Macropus does not hold it is a kind of a Russian.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the maleberry is a Russian.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Babylonian does consume.; sent9 & sent17 -> int8: the Babylonian does not consume.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the poorhouse does not embrown paisa but it is gymnastics.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__