that if the atomization occurs the fumbling redshank happens does not hold.
sent1: if the Taiwaneseness does not occur then that the typographicness does not occur but the atomization occurs is not true. sent2: that the Taiwaneseness occurs is prevented by that the fumbling redshank does not occur and the disincarnating happens. sent3: if that the non-typographicness and the atomization occurs is not true then the non-typographic happens. sent4: the fumbling redshank does not occur and the disincarnating occurs if the fumbling planted does not occur. sent5: the baccateness happens. sent6: if the minting Lipscomb happens the pushover occurs. sent7: that the minting Lipscomb occurs is brought about by that the fumbling homonym happens. sent8: the externalness occurs. sent9: if that the fumbling planted happens and the minting Lipscomb does not occur does not hold the fumbling planted does not occur. sent10: the fumbling redshank is triggered by that the Taiwanese happens. sent11: if the Taiwaneseness does not occur the unlocking occurs and the atomization happens. sent12: that the erection occurs triggers that the socialisticness happens. sent13: the fumbling planted happens if the pushover happens. sent14: if the atomization happens the fact that the Taiwanese happens is not false. sent15: the continentalness happens if the sojourning occurs. sent16: that the pauperization happens yields the inanimateness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the atomization occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Taiwaneseness occurs hold.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the fumbling redshank occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the typographicness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that if the atomization occurs the fumbling redshank happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Taiwaneseness does not occur then that the typographicness does not occur but the atomization occurs is not true. sent2: that the Taiwaneseness occurs is prevented by that the fumbling redshank does not occur and the disincarnating happens. sent3: if that the non-typographicness and the atomization occurs is not true then the non-typographic happens. sent4: the fumbling redshank does not occur and the disincarnating occurs if the fumbling planted does not occur. sent5: the baccateness happens. sent6: if the minting Lipscomb happens the pushover occurs. sent7: that the minting Lipscomb occurs is brought about by that the fumbling homonym happens. sent8: the externalness occurs. sent9: if that the fumbling planted happens and the minting Lipscomb does not occur does not hold the fumbling planted does not occur. sent10: the fumbling redshank is triggered by that the Taiwanese happens. sent11: if the Taiwaneseness does not occur the unlocking occurs and the atomization happens. sent12: that the erection occurs triggers that the socialisticness happens. sent13: the fumbling planted happens if the pushover happens. sent14: if the atomization happens the fact that the Taiwanese happens is not false. sent15: the continentalness happens if the sojourning occurs. sent16: that the pauperization happens yields the inanimateness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the atomization occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Taiwaneseness occurs hold.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the fumbling redshank occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__