that the coatee does coach ozonosphere is not incorrect if the myope is a coon.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is both a designation and not a wait does not hold. sent2: if the coatee does not coach ozonosphere then that it is a kind of a designation and it is not a wait is false. sent3: that the myope is not a kind of a coon and it is not a wait does not hold if it does not coach ozonosphere. sent4: the fact that the myope is not a kind of a coon is not false if something is a designation. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a designation and it is not a kind of a wait is not correct the myope is not a kind of a coon. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a designation and it waits is false. sent7: if the coatee does coach ozonosphere then the fact that it is both not a designation and not a wait is false. sent8: if the fact that something does not coach ozonosphere hold that the fact that it is not a designation and is not a wait is right does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a designation and it is not a kind of a wait. sent10: the coatee is not a retinene.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the myope is a kind of a coon hold.; sent8 -> int1: if the coatee does not coach ozonosphere that it is not a designation and it does not wait is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coatee does not coach ozonosphere.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the coatee is not a designation and is not a kind of a wait does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a designation and it does not wait is wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the myope is not a coon.; assump2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the coatee coaches ozonosphere.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the coatee does coach ozonosphere is not incorrect if the myope is a coon. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is both a designation and not a wait does not hold. sent2: if the coatee does not coach ozonosphere then that it is a kind of a designation and it is not a wait is false. sent3: that the myope is not a kind of a coon and it is not a wait does not hold if it does not coach ozonosphere. sent4: the fact that the myope is not a kind of a coon is not false if something is a designation. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a designation and it is not a kind of a wait is not correct the myope is not a kind of a coon. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a designation and it waits is false. sent7: if the coatee does coach ozonosphere then the fact that it is both not a designation and not a wait is false. sent8: if the fact that something does not coach ozonosphere hold that the fact that it is not a designation and is not a wait is right does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a designation and it is not a kind of a wait. sent10: the coatee is not a retinene. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the myope is a kind of a coon hold.; sent8 -> int1: if the coatee does not coach ozonosphere that it is not a designation and it does not wait is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coatee does not coach ozonosphere.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the coatee is not a designation and is not a kind of a wait does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a designation and it does not wait is wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the myope is not a coon.; assump2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the coatee coaches ozonosphere.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__