the snatcher is a congou.
sent1: the Botox is corrigible. sent2: the ball disrespects knitted. sent3: the canistel is a kind of a congou. sent4: the sneaker does not disrespect knitted if that it is not resistive is not right. sent5: that the snatcher is corrigible is true. sent6: the snatcher is rayless. sent7: the fact that the snatcher is a gemfibrozil is right. sent8: if something does hallucinate it is a congou. sent9: if the snatcher is corrigible it does not disrespect knitted. sent10: the snatcher does not disrespect knitted. sent11: the snatcher is a kind of an impala but it is not a kind of a puddler if it peels. sent12: if the snatcher is corrigible then it hallucinates and does not disrespect knitted. sent13: the snatcher does expel and is not a philhellene.
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: that the snatcher does hallucinate but it does not disrespect knitted hold.; int1 -> int2: the snatcher hallucinates.; sent8 -> int3: if that the snatcher does hallucinate is true then it is a congou.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the snatcher is a congou. ; $context$ = sent1: the Botox is corrigible. sent2: the ball disrespects knitted. sent3: the canistel is a kind of a congou. sent4: the sneaker does not disrespect knitted if that it is not resistive is not right. sent5: that the snatcher is corrigible is true. sent6: the snatcher is rayless. sent7: the fact that the snatcher is a gemfibrozil is right. sent8: if something does hallucinate it is a congou. sent9: if the snatcher is corrigible it does not disrespect knitted. sent10: the snatcher does not disrespect knitted. sent11: the snatcher is a kind of an impala but it is not a kind of a puddler if it peels. sent12: if the snatcher is corrigible then it hallucinates and does not disrespect knitted. sent13: the snatcher does expel and is not a philhellene. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: that the snatcher does hallucinate but it does not disrespect knitted hold.; int1 -> int2: the snatcher hallucinates.; sent8 -> int3: if that the snatcher does hallucinate is true then it is a congou.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__