the glycogen does not antisepticize vane.
sent1: if the vane does not correspond Melophagus the Stellite antisepticizes vane and is dramaturgic. sent2: the vane does not correspond Melophagus if the fact that the refrigerator does not correspond Melophagus and corresponds branchiopod is wrong. sent3: the glycogen is dramaturgic. sent4: the fact that something does not correspond Melophagus and does correspond branchiopod is incorrect if it is pectineal. sent5: the vane does unsaddle. sent6: if the vane does unsaddle and it is dramaturgic the glycogen does not antisepticize vane. sent7: the refrigerator is not a yuan and/or it does not imbue if the loser is visible. sent8: that everything antisepticizes Jacksonian hold. sent9: if something that does not zone glycogen is a colligation then it is visible. sent10: something does not zone glycogen and is a colligation if the fact that the fact that it does not antisepticize Jacksonian is not incorrect is wrong. sent11: the glycogen does unsaddle and corresponds branchiopod if the refrigerator is not a yuan. sent12: if something unsaddles the Stellite lurches. sent13: if either something is not a kind of a yuan or it does not imbue or both it is pectineal. sent14: that the glycogen is not conscientious is not false. sent15: something antisepticizes vane and unsaddles if it is not dramaturgic. sent16: the fact that the refrigerator is not a yuan is true. sent17: if the vane is both not a Tuesday and dramaturgic the fact that the glycogen is not dramaturgic is not wrong.
the Stellite is a lurch that antisepticizes vane.
sent11 & sent16 -> int1: the glycogen does unsaddle and it does correspond branchiopod.; int1 -> int2: that the glycogen does unsaddle is not false.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does unsaddle.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the Stellite does lurch.;
$hypothesis$ = the glycogen does not antisepticize vane. ; $context$ = sent1: if the vane does not correspond Melophagus the Stellite antisepticizes vane and is dramaturgic. sent2: the vane does not correspond Melophagus if the fact that the refrigerator does not correspond Melophagus and corresponds branchiopod is wrong. sent3: the glycogen is dramaturgic. sent4: the fact that something does not correspond Melophagus and does correspond branchiopod is incorrect if it is pectineal. sent5: the vane does unsaddle. sent6: if the vane does unsaddle and it is dramaturgic the glycogen does not antisepticize vane. sent7: the refrigerator is not a yuan and/or it does not imbue if the loser is visible. sent8: that everything antisepticizes Jacksonian hold. sent9: if something that does not zone glycogen is a colligation then it is visible. sent10: something does not zone glycogen and is a colligation if the fact that the fact that it does not antisepticize Jacksonian is not incorrect is wrong. sent11: the glycogen does unsaddle and corresponds branchiopod if the refrigerator is not a yuan. sent12: if something unsaddles the Stellite lurches. sent13: if either something is not a kind of a yuan or it does not imbue or both it is pectineal. sent14: that the glycogen is not conscientious is not false. sent15: something antisepticizes vane and unsaddles if it is not dramaturgic. sent16: the fact that the refrigerator is not a yuan is true. sent17: if the vane is both not a Tuesday and dramaturgic the fact that the glycogen is not dramaturgic is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__