that the incus is not a antrum is not incorrect.
sent1: the fisherman does not multiply dub. sent2: that the Teflon does not leach jagged is correct. sent3: something does ask suet but it is not a polarity. sent4: if the Teflon does not leach jagged then the magazine does leach Seattle and it is a Gavidae. sent5: there exists something such that it multiplies anathematization and is a Gavidae. sent6: there is something such that that it does ask suet and is a polarity is not true. sent7: that the incus does not leach Seattle hold if there is something such that it does not leach Seattle. sent8: if something multiplies anathematization and is not a Gavidae the incus is limbless. sent9: something does not multiply dub if the fact that it does multiply dub and multiplies anathematization is not true. sent10: if the incus does not multiply dub but it is a antrum it does leach Seattle. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it leaches Seattle and it does leach jagged is false. sent12: if something is a abrachia and limbless it does not multiply dub. sent13: there is something such that it leaches Seattle and does not leach jagged. sent14: there exists something such that it multiplies anathematization and it is not a kind of a Gavidae. sent15: there exists something such that that it asks suet and is not a kind of a polarity is not true. sent16: a limbed thing is both a abrachia and not non-audio-lingual. sent17: something does multiply anathematization. sent18: something is not a kind of a Gavidae. sent19: if something does not multiply dub then the fact that the magazine does multiply dub and it multiplies anathematization is not correct. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it does leach jagged and it leaches Seattle is true then the fusil is limbless. sent21: if there exists something such that that it asks suet and it is not a polarity is incorrect the fact that the incus is a abrachia hold. sent22: something that is audio-lingual and a think does not ask Teflon. sent23: the magazine is not a kind of a luger. sent24: the incus is a abrachia if there exists something such that it is a polarity. sent25: that the fusil does leach Seattle but it does not leach jagged is incorrect if the magazine is not a luger. sent26: if that the fusil is not a antrum and it is not a abrachia does not hold then the incus is a antrum.
sent15 & sent21 -> int1: the incus is a abrachia.; sent14 & sent8 -> int2: the incus is limbless.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the incus is a kind of a abrachia that is limbless.; sent12 -> int4: if the incus is a abrachia and limbless it does not multiply dub.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the incus does not multiply dub.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incus is a antrum.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the incus does not multiply dub and is a antrum.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the incus does leach Seattle.; sent25 & sent23 -> int8: the fact that the fusil leaches Seattle but it does not leach jagged is not true.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it does leach Seattle and it does not leach jagged is not correct.;
the incus is a antrum.
sent9 -> int10: the magazine does not multiply dub if that it does multiply dub and it multiplies anathematization is incorrect.; sent1 -> int11: there exists something such that it does not multiply dub.; int11 & sent19 -> int12: that the magazine multiplies dub and it does multiply anathematization is not correct.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the magazine does not multiply dub.; sent4 & sent2 -> int14: the magazine does leach Seattle and is a Gavidae.; int14 -> int15: the magazine leaches Seattle.; int13 & int15 -> int16: the magazine does not multiply dub but it leaches Seattle.;
$hypothesis$ = that the incus is not a antrum is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fisherman does not multiply dub. sent2: that the Teflon does not leach jagged is correct. sent3: something does ask suet but it is not a polarity. sent4: if the Teflon does not leach jagged then the magazine does leach Seattle and it is a Gavidae. sent5: there exists something such that it multiplies anathematization and is a Gavidae. sent6: there is something such that that it does ask suet and is a polarity is not true. sent7: that the incus does not leach Seattle hold if there is something such that it does not leach Seattle. sent8: if something multiplies anathematization and is not a Gavidae the incus is limbless. sent9: something does not multiply dub if the fact that it does multiply dub and multiplies anathematization is not true. sent10: if the incus does not multiply dub but it is a antrum it does leach Seattle. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it leaches Seattle and it does leach jagged is false. sent12: if something is a abrachia and limbless it does not multiply dub. sent13: there is something such that it leaches Seattle and does not leach jagged. sent14: there exists something such that it multiplies anathematization and it is not a kind of a Gavidae. sent15: there exists something such that that it asks suet and is not a kind of a polarity is not true. sent16: a limbed thing is both a abrachia and not non-audio-lingual. sent17: something does multiply anathematization. sent18: something is not a kind of a Gavidae. sent19: if something does not multiply dub then the fact that the magazine does multiply dub and it multiplies anathematization is not correct. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it does leach jagged and it leaches Seattle is true then the fusil is limbless. sent21: if there exists something such that that it asks suet and it is not a polarity is incorrect the fact that the incus is a abrachia hold. sent22: something that is audio-lingual and a think does not ask Teflon. sent23: the magazine is not a kind of a luger. sent24: the incus is a abrachia if there exists something such that it is a polarity. sent25: that the fusil does leach Seattle but it does not leach jagged is incorrect if the magazine is not a luger. sent26: if that the fusil is not a antrum and it is not a abrachia does not hold then the incus is a antrum. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent21 -> int1: the incus is a abrachia.; sent14 & sent8 -> int2: the incus is limbless.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the incus is a kind of a abrachia that is limbless.; sent12 -> int4: if the incus is a abrachia and limbless it does not multiply dub.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the incus does not multiply dub.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incus is a antrum.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the incus does not multiply dub and is a antrum.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the incus does leach Seattle.; sent25 & sent23 -> int8: the fact that the fusil leaches Seattle but it does not leach jagged is not true.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it does leach Seattle and it does not leach jagged is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__