the bubblejet does not hyperventilate.
sent1: if that the wearer does not hyperventilate and is saponaceous is not true the bubblejet hyperventilate. sent2: the I does not pattern ridge and is a kind of a mauve if the wog is full-time. sent3: the bottlecap is not saponaceous but it is a kind of a polarography if the dhawa is a kind of a minuscule. sent4: if the I does pattern ridge and it is a free then the wearer is not a pterion. sent5: the ridge patterns ridge. sent6: if the lacertid is not avascular the extravasation patterns ridge. sent7: if the wog is a mauve then the napalm is a mauve. sent8: the bubblejet is not minuscule if the I does hyperventilate. sent9: if there is something such that that it is not full-time and is free is wrong then the extravasation is riparian. sent10: the I does pattern ridge. sent11: if that the extravasation is a free and it patterns ridge is not false the bubblejet does not hyperventilate. sent12: there exists something such that that it is a pterion and it is a polarography is false. sent13: the wearer does free. sent14: the wog is a mauve. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not full-time and is riparian is not right the I is catarrhine. sent16: the fact that the extravasation is not a mauve but a free is not right. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a pterion and it is a polarography is wrong the extravasation frees. sent18: the lacertid is not avascular if the napalm is a catarrhine. sent19: the napalm is not riparian. sent20: the bottlecap is saponaceous if the I is not a minuscule and is full-time. sent21: if the napalm is a mauve then it is a catarrhine. sent22: the dhawa does not hyperventilate. sent23: the dhawa is not full-time. sent24: if the I hyperventilates it frees. sent25: the wearer is riparian. sent26: there exists something such that it is not riparian and it is avascular. sent27: the I is avascular. sent28: if the bottlecap is saponaceous the fact that the dhawa is both not a pterion and a polarography is not true. sent29: the I is not a kind of a minuscule but it is full-time if the wearer is riparian. sent30: the wearer patterns ridge.
sent29 & sent25 -> int1: the fact that the I is not a minuscule but it is full-time hold.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the bottlecap is saponaceous.; int2 & sent28 -> int3: that the dhawa is not a pterion but a polarography is not right.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a pterion and it is a polarography is wrong.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the extravasation is a free.; sent7 & sent14 -> int6: the napalm is a mauve.; sent21 & int6 -> int7: the napalm is a catarrhine.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the lacertid is not avascular.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the extravasation does pattern ridge.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the extravasation is a free and it patterns ridge.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the bubblejet does hyperventilate.
$hypothesis$ = the bubblejet does not hyperventilate. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the wearer does not hyperventilate and is saponaceous is not true the bubblejet hyperventilate. sent2: the I does not pattern ridge and is a kind of a mauve if the wog is full-time. sent3: the bottlecap is not saponaceous but it is a kind of a polarography if the dhawa is a kind of a minuscule. sent4: if the I does pattern ridge and it is a free then the wearer is not a pterion. sent5: the ridge patterns ridge. sent6: if the lacertid is not avascular the extravasation patterns ridge. sent7: if the wog is a mauve then the napalm is a mauve. sent8: the bubblejet is not minuscule if the I does hyperventilate. sent9: if there is something such that that it is not full-time and is free is wrong then the extravasation is riparian. sent10: the I does pattern ridge. sent11: if that the extravasation is a free and it patterns ridge is not false the bubblejet does not hyperventilate. sent12: there exists something such that that it is a pterion and it is a polarography is false. sent13: the wearer does free. sent14: the wog is a mauve. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not full-time and is riparian is not right the I is catarrhine. sent16: the fact that the extravasation is not a mauve but a free is not right. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a pterion and it is a polarography is wrong the extravasation frees. sent18: the lacertid is not avascular if the napalm is a catarrhine. sent19: the napalm is not riparian. sent20: the bottlecap is saponaceous if the I is not a minuscule and is full-time. sent21: if the napalm is a mauve then it is a catarrhine. sent22: the dhawa does not hyperventilate. sent23: the dhawa is not full-time. sent24: if the I hyperventilates it frees. sent25: the wearer is riparian. sent26: there exists something such that it is not riparian and it is avascular. sent27: the I is avascular. sent28: if the bottlecap is saponaceous the fact that the dhawa is both not a pterion and a polarography is not true. sent29: the I is not a kind of a minuscule but it is full-time if the wearer is riparian. sent30: the wearer patterns ridge. ; $proof$ = 
sent29 & sent25 -> int1: the fact that the I is not a minuscule but it is full-time hold.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the bottlecap is saponaceous.; int2 & sent28 -> int3: that the dhawa is not a pterion but a polarography is not right.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a pterion and it is a polarography is wrong.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the extravasation is a free.; sent7 & sent14 -> int6: the napalm is a mauve.; sent21 & int6 -> int7: the napalm is a catarrhine.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the lacertid is not avascular.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the extravasation does pattern ridge.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the extravasation is a free and it patterns ridge.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__