the adjectiveness occurs.
sent1: the adjective does not occur if the necklessness happens and the clanking jealousy happens. sent2: the corinthianness occurs. sent3: the disfigurement does not occur if that the one-step and the non-Numidianness occurs does not hold. sent4: that the clanking jealousy happens is prevented by that the nonfatalness does not occur and the sputtering Fauntleroy does not occur. sent5: the Numidian occurs and the nonfatalness happens. sent6: if the sputtering cribbage does not occur then the fragmenting determinateness and the curvet happens. sent7: that the clanking jealousy and the triage happens is caused by that the sputtering Fauntleroy does not occur. sent8: the sputtering Fauntleroy does not occur. sent9: the one-step occurs. sent10: the necklessness does not occur if either the triage does not occur or the necklessness does not occur or both. sent11: if the non-eccrineness and the one-step happens the necklessness occurs. sent12: if the fact that either the eccrineness occurs or the disfigurement happens or both is not wrong the Numidianness does not occur. sent13: the non-Rabelaisianness is caused by that either the fragmenting porterage occurs or the part-timeness happens or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the eccrineness happens hold.; assump1 -> int1: either the eccrineness happens or the disfigurement occurs or both.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Numidianness does not occur.; sent5 -> int3: the Numidian happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the eccrineness does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the non-eccrineness and the one-stepping happens.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the necklessness happens.; sent7 & sent8 -> int8: the clanking jealousy and the triage occurs.; int8 -> int9: the clanking jealousy happens.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the necklessness and the clanking jealousy occurs.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the adjective occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the adjectiveness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the adjective does not occur if the necklessness happens and the clanking jealousy happens. sent2: the corinthianness occurs. sent3: the disfigurement does not occur if that the one-step and the non-Numidianness occurs does not hold. sent4: that the clanking jealousy happens is prevented by that the nonfatalness does not occur and the sputtering Fauntleroy does not occur. sent5: the Numidian occurs and the nonfatalness happens. sent6: if the sputtering cribbage does not occur then the fragmenting determinateness and the curvet happens. sent7: that the clanking jealousy and the triage happens is caused by that the sputtering Fauntleroy does not occur. sent8: the sputtering Fauntleroy does not occur. sent9: the one-step occurs. sent10: the necklessness does not occur if either the triage does not occur or the necklessness does not occur or both. sent11: if the non-eccrineness and the one-step happens the necklessness occurs. sent12: if the fact that either the eccrineness occurs or the disfigurement happens or both is not wrong the Numidianness does not occur. sent13: the non-Rabelaisianness is caused by that either the fragmenting porterage occurs or the part-timeness happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the eccrineness happens hold.; assump1 -> int1: either the eccrineness happens or the disfigurement occurs or both.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Numidianness does not occur.; sent5 -> int3: the Numidian happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the eccrineness does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the non-eccrineness and the one-stepping happens.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the necklessness happens.; sent7 & sent8 -> int8: the clanking jealousy and the triage occurs.; int8 -> int9: the clanking jealousy happens.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the necklessness and the clanking jealousy occurs.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__