the fact that the dimity is a kind of a leotard is not incorrect if the fact that the topminnow is not categorial and not a retinene is not true.
sent1: if the topminnow is not categorial and it is not a retinene then the dimity is a Andorran. sent2: if that the topminnow is a leotard but it is not a kind of a Andorran does not hold then the dimity is a kind of a retinene. sent3: that the topminnow is not a kind of a bap hold. sent4: the topminnow is a retinene. sent5: if the topminnow is non-categorial thing that is not a retinene then the fact that the dimity is a leotard is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that something is non-ursine thing that is not a retinene is wrong if it is a leotard. sent7: if that the dimity is not a retinene and it is not a Andorran is not correct the topminnow is a leotard. sent8: the topminnow is categorial. sent9: if something is not subcortical then it is a leotard and is a Andorran. sent10: something that is a Andorran is a leotard. sent11: the fact that the topminnow is not categorial but it is a retinene does not hold. sent12: if the fact that that the dimity is not a leotard and not a retinene is not incorrect is not right the topminnow is a Andorran. sent13: the topminnow is a retinene if it is a leotard. sent14: if that the topminnow is not categorial and is not a kind of a retinene does not hold the dimity is a Andorran. sent15: the fact that the topminnow is categorial but not a retinene is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the topminnow is not categorial and it is not a kind of a retinene is false is not incorrect.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the dimity is a kind of a Andorran.; sent10 -> int2: the dimity is a leotard if it is a Andorran.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dimity is a leotard.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tureen is not ursine and is not a retinene is not true.
sent6 -> int4: if the tureen is a kind of a leotard that that it is both non-ursine and not a retinene is not incorrect does not hold.; sent9 -> int5: if the tureen is not subcortical it is a leotard and is Andorran.; sent3 -> int6: something is not a kind of a bap.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dimity is a kind of a leotard is not incorrect if the fact that the topminnow is not categorial and not a retinene is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the topminnow is not categorial and it is not a retinene then the dimity is a Andorran. sent2: if that the topminnow is a leotard but it is not a kind of a Andorran does not hold then the dimity is a kind of a retinene. sent3: that the topminnow is not a kind of a bap hold. sent4: the topminnow is a retinene. sent5: if the topminnow is non-categorial thing that is not a retinene then the fact that the dimity is a leotard is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that something is non-ursine thing that is not a retinene is wrong if it is a leotard. sent7: if that the dimity is not a retinene and it is not a Andorran is not correct the topminnow is a leotard. sent8: the topminnow is categorial. sent9: if something is not subcortical then it is a leotard and is a Andorran. sent10: something that is a Andorran is a leotard. sent11: the fact that the topminnow is not categorial but it is a retinene does not hold. sent12: if the fact that that the dimity is not a leotard and not a retinene is not incorrect is not right the topminnow is a Andorran. sent13: the topminnow is a retinene if it is a leotard. sent14: if that the topminnow is not categorial and is not a kind of a retinene does not hold the dimity is a Andorran. sent15: the fact that the topminnow is categorial but not a retinene is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the topminnow is not categorial and it is not a kind of a retinene is false is not incorrect.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the dimity is a kind of a Andorran.; sent10 -> int2: the dimity is a leotard if it is a Andorran.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dimity is a leotard.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__