the biopsy does not occur if the harmlessness does not occur but the hyperthermalness occurs.
sent1: that the unjustness does not occur but the cytophotometry happens yields the non-parochialness. sent2: the fabricating scleredema does not occur and the biopsy does not occur if the parochialness does not occur. sent3: that the harmfulness and the hyperthermalness occurs does not hold if the devaluing does not occur. sent4: if the side-glance does not occur then both the non-unjustness and the cytophotometry happens. sent5: both the fabricating scleredema and the parochialness occurs if the unjustness does not occur. sent6: the unargumentativeness occurs. sent7: that the uniformness occurs but the self-control does not occur triggers that the side-glance does not occur. sent8: that the fabricating infructescence and the addiction occurs is not true if the patterning does not occur. sent9: if that the skeet does not occur hold then the fabricating plectognath occurs. sent10: that the harmlessness occurs and the hyperthermalness happens results in that the biopsy does not occur. sent11: the messaging occurs and the synchronicness happens if the fabricating Hogmanay does not occur. sent12: that the agitating happens is not incorrect. sent13: if the fabricating cogency does not occur then the investigation occurs and the foliateness happens. sent14: if both the fabricating scleredema and the devaluing occurs then the biopsy does not occur. sent15: that not the yak but the attorneyship happens is incorrect. sent16: if the agitating occurs and the harassment happens then the fabricating goosander occurs. sent17: if the lumbosacralness does not occur then the fact that not the broiling Tartary but the proposal happens is not correct. sent18: the unjustness does not occur and the cytophotometry does not occur. sent19: the broiling karaoke does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the devaluing does not occur.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: that not the harmlessness but the hyperthermalness occurs is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-harmlessness and the hyperthermalness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the devaluing happens.; sent18 -> int4: the unjustness does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fabricating scleredema happens and the parochialness happens.; int5 -> int6: the fabricating scleredema occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: both the fabricating scleredema and the devaluing occurs.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the biopsy does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the pharyngealness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the biopsy does not occur if the harmlessness does not occur but the hyperthermalness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the unjustness does not occur but the cytophotometry happens yields the non-parochialness. sent2: the fabricating scleredema does not occur and the biopsy does not occur if the parochialness does not occur. sent3: that the harmfulness and the hyperthermalness occurs does not hold if the devaluing does not occur. sent4: if the side-glance does not occur then both the non-unjustness and the cytophotometry happens. sent5: both the fabricating scleredema and the parochialness occurs if the unjustness does not occur. sent6: the unargumentativeness occurs. sent7: that the uniformness occurs but the self-control does not occur triggers that the side-glance does not occur. sent8: that the fabricating infructescence and the addiction occurs is not true if the patterning does not occur. sent9: if that the skeet does not occur hold then the fabricating plectognath occurs. sent10: that the harmlessness occurs and the hyperthermalness happens results in that the biopsy does not occur. sent11: the messaging occurs and the synchronicness happens if the fabricating Hogmanay does not occur. sent12: that the agitating happens is not incorrect. sent13: if the fabricating cogency does not occur then the investigation occurs and the foliateness happens. sent14: if both the fabricating scleredema and the devaluing occurs then the biopsy does not occur. sent15: that not the yak but the attorneyship happens is incorrect. sent16: if the agitating occurs and the harassment happens then the fabricating goosander occurs. sent17: if the lumbosacralness does not occur then the fact that not the broiling Tartary but the proposal happens is not correct. sent18: the unjustness does not occur and the cytophotometry does not occur. sent19: the broiling karaoke does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the devaluing does not occur.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: that not the harmlessness but the hyperthermalness occurs is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-harmlessness and the hyperthermalness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the devaluing happens.; sent18 -> int4: the unjustness does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fabricating scleredema happens and the parochialness happens.; int5 -> int6: the fabricating scleredema occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: both the fabricating scleredema and the devaluing occurs.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the biopsy does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__