the orgasm occurs and the fielding fellah does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the fielding fellah happens and the orgasm happens is not false if the beef does not occur. sent2: the fielding officiant happens. sent3: the fact that both the numerating participant and the beading mustard occurs is not right. sent4: that the contempt happens yields that the schismaticness occurs. sent5: the open-sourceness occurs. sent6: the beading bedroll occurs. sent7: the fielding glycoprotein does not occur if the homily does not occur. sent8: the beading roofing causes that the xenotransplant occurs. sent9: the fielding glycoprotein occurs. sent10: the snowmobiling does not occur. sent11: the fielding fellah does not occur if both the xenotransplant and the fielding officiant occurs. sent12: the fielding glycoprotein does not occur if the fact that the financier occurs and the homily occurs is not correct. sent13: the orgasm happens. sent14: the haircare does not occur if the fact that the beading roofing and/or the fielding glycoprotein occurs is wrong. sent15: that the lightning and/or the barring digitization occurs prevents the beef. sent16: that the financier occurs and the homily occurs is wrong if the beading roofing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the beading roofing does not occur is not incorrect.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the financier and the homily happens is not correct.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fielding glycoprotein does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the beading roofing occurs is true.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the xenotransplant happens.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: both the xenotransplant and the fielding officiant happens.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the fielding fellah does not occur.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the haircare does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the orgasm occurs and the fielding fellah does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fielding fellah happens and the orgasm happens is not false if the beef does not occur. sent2: the fielding officiant happens. sent3: the fact that both the numerating participant and the beading mustard occurs is not right. sent4: that the contempt happens yields that the schismaticness occurs. sent5: the open-sourceness occurs. sent6: the beading bedroll occurs. sent7: the fielding glycoprotein does not occur if the homily does not occur. sent8: the beading roofing causes that the xenotransplant occurs. sent9: the fielding glycoprotein occurs. sent10: the snowmobiling does not occur. sent11: the fielding fellah does not occur if both the xenotransplant and the fielding officiant occurs. sent12: the fielding glycoprotein does not occur if the fact that the financier occurs and the homily occurs is not correct. sent13: the orgasm happens. sent14: the haircare does not occur if the fact that the beading roofing and/or the fielding glycoprotein occurs is wrong. sent15: that the lightning and/or the barring digitization occurs prevents the beef. sent16: that the financier occurs and the homily occurs is wrong if the beading roofing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the beading roofing does not occur is not incorrect.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the financier and the homily happens is not correct.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fielding glycoprotein does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the beading roofing occurs is true.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the xenotransplant happens.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: both the xenotransplant and the fielding officiant happens.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the fielding fellah does not occur.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__