that that the flicking venule does not occur yields that the ignoring sheet does not occur is not correct.
sent1: that not the flicking venule but the tangentialness occurs does not hold. sent2: that the varnishing Argentinian happens prevents that the hydroelectricness happens. sent3: if the ladder happens then the womanlyness and the pneumonectomy happens. sent4: if the flicking venule does not occur then the ignoring sheet occurs. sent5: the ban is triggered by the cross-sectionalness. sent6: that the unwomanliness happens prevents that the fascinating does not occur. sent7: if the ignoring sheet occurs the tangentialness happens. sent8: the indoctrination happens. sent9: the volution does not occur if the perorating happens. sent10: that the corrupting does not occur leads to that the mamboing does not occur. sent11: the refuting uncommunicativeness happens. sent12: the lovableness does not occur. sent13: that the varnishing inviting does not occur and the ignoring waw occurs is not right. sent14: the fact that the mortification happens and the hydroelectricness happens is incorrect. sent15: the fact that not the varnishing diabolism but the bomb occurs is not true. sent16: that the ignoring sheet does not occur if the flicking venule occurs is not incorrect. sent17: that the flicking venule and the tangentialness occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ignoring sheet occurs.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the tangentialness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flicking venule does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the flicking venule does not occur and the tangentialness happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the ignoring sheet does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the womanlyness and the flicking handstamp happens.
$hypothesis$ = that that the flicking venule does not occur yields that the ignoring sheet does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the flicking venule but the tangentialness occurs does not hold. sent2: that the varnishing Argentinian happens prevents that the hydroelectricness happens. sent3: if the ladder happens then the womanlyness and the pneumonectomy happens. sent4: if the flicking venule does not occur then the ignoring sheet occurs. sent5: the ban is triggered by the cross-sectionalness. sent6: that the unwomanliness happens prevents that the fascinating does not occur. sent7: if the ignoring sheet occurs the tangentialness happens. sent8: the indoctrination happens. sent9: the volution does not occur if the perorating happens. sent10: that the corrupting does not occur leads to that the mamboing does not occur. sent11: the refuting uncommunicativeness happens. sent12: the lovableness does not occur. sent13: that the varnishing inviting does not occur and the ignoring waw occurs is not right. sent14: the fact that the mortification happens and the hydroelectricness happens is incorrect. sent15: the fact that not the varnishing diabolism but the bomb occurs is not true. sent16: that the ignoring sheet does not occur if the flicking venule occurs is not incorrect. sent17: that the flicking venule and the tangentialness occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ignoring sheet occurs.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the tangentialness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flicking venule does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the flicking venule does not occur and the tangentialness happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the ignoring sheet does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__