the sporran is a kind of a nutrition.
sent1: if the schipperke volunteers it is not a Mongol. sent2: something that is not a volunteer is not a nutrition and does overwhelm. sent3: the fact that the schipperke is not a pick is not incorrect. sent4: that the sporran is not a Zhukov and does overwhelm is right if the schipperke is not a kind of a volunteer. sent5: that the schipperke does not skim termer and it does not pick is wrong. sent6: that the schipperke does not unbar trainer and is a Mongol does not hold if it is not a Silex. sent7: something is not a Mongol if it volunteers. sent8: the schipperke is not nonarbitrable. sent9: the schipperke is not Mongol. sent10: the schipperke is both not a Silex and not a pick. sent11: if the sporran is a Zhukov and does overwhelm it is a nutrition. sent12: if the termer is not cryogenics then the fact that it is not a perishable and is a pick is wrong. sent13: the fact that the schipperke does not unbar trainer but it is a Mongol is wrong. sent14: the epauliere is not a pick if that the termer is a kind of imperishable a pick is not right. sent15: that something does not unbar trainer and is not a Mongol does not hold if it is not a Silex. sent16: something does not unbar trainer and is not a Mongol if it is a volunteer. sent17: if the abductor is not a nutrition and does overwhelm the sporran is not a nutrition. sent18: if the schipperke is not a kind of a volunteer then that the sporran is not a Zhukov hold.
sent16 -> int1: if the schipperke does volunteer it does not unbar trainer and it is not a kind of a Mongol.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schipperke does volunteer.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the schipperke does not unbar trainer and is not a Mongol.; sent15 -> int3: if the schipperke is not a Silex that it does not unbar trainer and is not a kind of a Mongol does not hold.; sent10 -> int4: the schipperke is not a kind of a Silex.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the schipperke does not unbar trainer and it is not a Mongol is incorrect.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the schipperke does not volunteer.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the sporran is not a Zhukov but it does overwhelm.;
the sporran is not a nutrition.
sent2 -> int9: the abductor is not a nutrition but it overwhelms if it is not a kind of a volunteer.;
$hypothesis$ = the sporran is a kind of a nutrition. ; $context$ = sent1: if the schipperke volunteers it is not a Mongol. sent2: something that is not a volunteer is not a nutrition and does overwhelm. sent3: the fact that the schipperke is not a pick is not incorrect. sent4: that the sporran is not a Zhukov and does overwhelm is right if the schipperke is not a kind of a volunteer. sent5: that the schipperke does not skim termer and it does not pick is wrong. sent6: that the schipperke does not unbar trainer and is a Mongol does not hold if it is not a Silex. sent7: something is not a Mongol if it volunteers. sent8: the schipperke is not nonarbitrable. sent9: the schipperke is not Mongol. sent10: the schipperke is both not a Silex and not a pick. sent11: if the sporran is a Zhukov and does overwhelm it is a nutrition. sent12: if the termer is not cryogenics then the fact that it is not a perishable and is a pick is wrong. sent13: the fact that the schipperke does not unbar trainer but it is a Mongol is wrong. sent14: the epauliere is not a pick if that the termer is a kind of imperishable a pick is not right. sent15: that something does not unbar trainer and is not a Mongol does not hold if it is not a Silex. sent16: something does not unbar trainer and is not a Mongol if it is a volunteer. sent17: if the abductor is not a nutrition and does overwhelm the sporran is not a nutrition. sent18: if the schipperke is not a kind of a volunteer then that the sporran is not a Zhukov hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the schipperke does volunteer it does not unbar trainer and it is not a kind of a Mongol.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schipperke does volunteer.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the schipperke does not unbar trainer and is not a Mongol.; sent15 -> int3: if the schipperke is not a Silex that it does not unbar trainer and is not a kind of a Mongol does not hold.; sent10 -> int4: the schipperke is not a kind of a Silex.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the schipperke does not unbar trainer and it is not a Mongol is incorrect.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the schipperke does not volunteer.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the sporran is not a Zhukov but it does overwhelm.; __UNKNOWN__