the fact that there exists something such that if it is not an inevitable then the fact that it does condole wartime and it does not darken is not true does not hold.
sent1: that the toyshop is a kind of a jacklight but it is not a kind of an inevitable is wrong if it is not a cheek. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not umbellate that it is a reaction and it is not a costliness is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if it is punctureless then the fact that it does bend lingam and is not a kind of a Regency is not correct. sent4: the fact that something does bend dropout but it is not a kind of an inevitable is wrong if the fact that it is not Colombian is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the bull does darken but it is not manageable is not right if it is not a Hungarian. sent6: the fact that the hypha condoles wartime but it does not darken is wrong if it is not an inevitable. sent7: if the hypha is not a vernier then the fact that the fact that it is a kind of antistrophic thing that is not an irrigation is true does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not an inevitable then the fact that it does condole wartime and does darken is not right. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not concern culotte then the fact that it is a kind of a slumgullion and it is not malignant is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not perinasal that it is a biochemist that does not bend meitnerium is false. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a hinny that it is a kind of a Viscum and is not microcosmic is wrong. sent12: the fact that the hypha condoles wartime and does not darken is not true if it is an inevitable. sent13: if the hypha is not a kind of an inevitable the fact that it condoles wartime and it darkens is not true. sent14: the hypha does condole wartime and does not darken if it is not an inevitable. sent15: there exists something such that if it is an inevitable the fact that it does condole wartime and does not darken is not true. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not an inevitable it does condole wartime and does not darken. sent17: there is something such that if it is not cardiac that it is both radioactive and not a footed is incorrect. sent18: the fact that if the obturator does not act hypha that the obturator condoles wartime and is not a hoe does not hold is not wrong. sent19: that the hypha does condole Thunderer but it is not a lecture is false if it is not a kind of a Hungarian. sent20: the fact that something acts dustmop and does not condole flabbiness is wrong if it does not glom.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the meitnerium is not a Colombian is not wrong then the fact that it does bend dropout and is not an inevitable is not right.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not an inevitable then the fact that it does condole wartime and it does not darken is not true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the toyshop is a kind of a jacklight but it is not a kind of an inevitable is wrong if it is not a cheek. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not umbellate that it is a reaction and it is not a costliness is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if it is punctureless then the fact that it does bend lingam and is not a kind of a Regency is not correct. sent4: the fact that something does bend dropout but it is not a kind of an inevitable is wrong if the fact that it is not Colombian is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the bull does darken but it is not manageable is not right if it is not a Hungarian. sent6: the fact that the hypha condoles wartime but it does not darken is wrong if it is not an inevitable. sent7: if the hypha is not a vernier then the fact that the fact that it is a kind of antistrophic thing that is not an irrigation is true does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not an inevitable then the fact that it does condole wartime and does darken is not right. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not concern culotte then the fact that it is a kind of a slumgullion and it is not malignant is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not perinasal that it is a biochemist that does not bend meitnerium is false. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a hinny that it is a kind of a Viscum and is not microcosmic is wrong. sent12: the fact that the hypha condoles wartime and does not darken is not true if it is an inevitable. sent13: if the hypha is not a kind of an inevitable the fact that it condoles wartime and it darkens is not true. sent14: the hypha does condole wartime and does not darken if it is not an inevitable. sent15: there exists something such that if it is an inevitable the fact that it does condole wartime and does not darken is not true. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not an inevitable it does condole wartime and does not darken. sent17: there is something such that if it is not cardiac that it is both radioactive and not a footed is incorrect. sent18: the fact that if the obturator does not act hypha that the obturator condoles wartime and is not a hoe does not hold is not wrong. sent19: that the hypha does condole Thunderer but it is not a lecture is false if it is not a kind of a Hungarian. sent20: the fact that something acts dustmop and does not condole flabbiness is wrong if it does not glom. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__