the sights is not a shrewdness.
sent1: the MVP does not melanize once-over if the fact that the grigri is not a indinavir and it is not a parented is incorrect. sent2: something purposes if that it is not a purposes and it is not intracellular is wrong. sent3: the MVP is a Ziphiidae if the underdevelopment is not a kind of an atrocity. sent4: the underdevelopment is tellurian. sent5: if something is a limnology it is a shrewdness. sent6: something is not a chorale but it is a solferino if it is a purpose. sent7: if something is both not a chorale and a solferino it is not a limnology. sent8: the underdevelopment does not melanize once-over if the MVP does not melanize once-over. sent9: the fact that the MVP is a Ziphiidae is true if the underdevelopment is lithic. sent10: the grigri is not a tome if the fact that it does repine gangliocyte and it thrusts does not hold. sent11: everything is not enteric. sent12: if the roadman is not enteric then it is a kind of an atrocity. sent13: if the MVP is a Ziphiidae the sights is a limnology. sent14: if the underdevelopment is not a limnology then the sights is not a Ziphiidae and is lithic. sent15: if that the roadman is a shrewdness is true then that the sights is not an atrocity is wrong. sent16: if something does not melanize once-over that it is not a purpose and it is not intracellular is incorrect. sent17: the fact that something is not a indinavir and it is not a parented is not right if it is not a tome. sent18: the lunula is a kind of a limnology. sent19: something is a kind of non-enteric thing that is an atrocity if it is not a Ziphiidae. sent20: the underdevelopment is lithic and/or it is not an atrocity if the fact that the roadman is an atrocity is not wrong. sent21: if a non-enteric thing is an atrocity then it is not a shrewdness.
sent11 -> int1: the roadman is non-enteric.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the roadman is an atrocity.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the underdevelopment is lithic and/or is not an atrocity.; int3 & sent9 & sent3 -> int4: the MVP is a Ziphiidae.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the sights is a limnology.; sent5 -> int6: the sights is a shrewdness if it is a kind of a limnology.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the sights is not a kind of a shrewdness.
sent21 -> int7: if the sights is not enteric but it is a kind of an atrocity then it is not a shrewdness.; sent19 -> int8: if the sights is not a Ziphiidae then it is not enteric and it is a kind of an atrocity.; sent7 -> int9: the underdevelopment is not a kind of a limnology if it is not a chorale and it is a kind of a solferino.; sent6 -> int10: the underdevelopment is not a chorale and is a kind of a solferino if it does purpose.; sent2 -> int11: if that the underdevelopment does not purpose and it is not intracellular does not hold then it does purpose.; sent16 -> int12: if the underdevelopment does not melanize once-over the fact that it is not a purpose and not intracellular is false.; sent17 -> int13: the fact that the grigri is not a indinavir and it is not a parented is wrong if it is not a kind of a tome.;
$hypothesis$ = the sights is not a shrewdness. ; $context$ = sent1: the MVP does not melanize once-over if the fact that the grigri is not a indinavir and it is not a parented is incorrect. sent2: something purposes if that it is not a purposes and it is not intracellular is wrong. sent3: the MVP is a Ziphiidae if the underdevelopment is not a kind of an atrocity. sent4: the underdevelopment is tellurian. sent5: if something is a limnology it is a shrewdness. sent6: something is not a chorale but it is a solferino if it is a purpose. sent7: if something is both not a chorale and a solferino it is not a limnology. sent8: the underdevelopment does not melanize once-over if the MVP does not melanize once-over. sent9: the fact that the MVP is a Ziphiidae is true if the underdevelopment is lithic. sent10: the grigri is not a tome if the fact that it does repine gangliocyte and it thrusts does not hold. sent11: everything is not enteric. sent12: if the roadman is not enteric then it is a kind of an atrocity. sent13: if the MVP is a Ziphiidae the sights is a limnology. sent14: if the underdevelopment is not a limnology then the sights is not a Ziphiidae and is lithic. sent15: if that the roadman is a shrewdness is true then that the sights is not an atrocity is wrong. sent16: if something does not melanize once-over that it is not a purpose and it is not intracellular is incorrect. sent17: the fact that something is not a indinavir and it is not a parented is not right if it is not a tome. sent18: the lunula is a kind of a limnology. sent19: something is a kind of non-enteric thing that is an atrocity if it is not a Ziphiidae. sent20: the underdevelopment is lithic and/or it is not an atrocity if the fact that the roadman is an atrocity is not wrong. sent21: if a non-enteric thing is an atrocity then it is not a shrewdness. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the roadman is non-enteric.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the roadman is an atrocity.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the underdevelopment is lithic and/or is not an atrocity.; int3 & sent9 & sent3 -> int4: the MVP is a Ziphiidae.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the sights is a limnology.; sent5 -> int6: the sights is a shrewdness if it is a kind of a limnology.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__