that there exists something such that if it is not alar it is inaesthetic and/or it is not a kind of a disruption is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not mark ICC it either is a kind of a bewitchery or marks numerator or both. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a fomite it is not intolerant or it stomps or both. sent3: if the showerhead does not mark undoer then it is a possible or does not marshal Mojave or both. sent4: the affiant is menstrual and/or it is not zygomatic if the fact that it is not a kind of a disruption is not false. sent5: if the undoer is not alar it is inaesthetic or not a disruption or both. sent6: if the undoer is not alar then it is a carillonneur or does not digress or both. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not actinal that it does marshal nummulite and/or it is not a kind of a Tiepolo is correct. sent8: if the undoer is alar the fact that it is inaesthetic and/or is not a kind of a disruption is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that if that it does not preoccupy downshift is wrong then it is either Gothic or not a theorization or both. sent10: the undoer is a conceptualization and/or it is not a Kosciusko if it is not a kind of a canker. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a rouge that it is counterterror and/or does mark Junker is not wrong. sent12: if the undoer is not an ocean it is a kind of a phalanger and/or it is not inaesthetic. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a service it is a kind of a foremanship and/or does not preoccupy imponderable. sent14: the undoer is inaesthetic and/or it is a disruption if it is not alar.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not alar it is inaesthetic and/or it is not a kind of a disruption is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not mark ICC it either is a kind of a bewitchery or marks numerator or both. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a fomite it is not intolerant or it stomps or both. sent3: if the showerhead does not mark undoer then it is a possible or does not marshal Mojave or both. sent4: the affiant is menstrual and/or it is not zygomatic if the fact that it is not a kind of a disruption is not false. sent5: if the undoer is not alar it is inaesthetic or not a disruption or both. sent6: if the undoer is not alar then it is a carillonneur or does not digress or both. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not actinal that it does marshal nummulite and/or it is not a kind of a Tiepolo is correct. sent8: if the undoer is alar the fact that it is inaesthetic and/or is not a kind of a disruption is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that if that it does not preoccupy downshift is wrong then it is either Gothic or not a theorization or both. sent10: the undoer is a conceptualization and/or it is not a Kosciusko if it is not a kind of a canker. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a rouge that it is counterterror and/or does mark Junker is not wrong. sent12: if the undoer is not an ocean it is a kind of a phalanger and/or it is not inaesthetic. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a service it is a kind of a foremanship and/or does not preoccupy imponderable. sent14: the undoer is inaesthetic and/or it is a disruption if it is not alar. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__