the droshky is a convention.
sent1: if something is natal and it does deactivate euphonium then the antheridiophore is a convention. sent2: that something does not cascade revivalism and is a mescal is false if it cascades homogeny. sent3: the fact that something is not natal and deactivates euphonium is false if it is a leatherleaf. sent4: the droshky confederates droshky and is a taffy. sent5: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a convention and it does deactivate euphonium is not false. sent6: everything cascades homogeny and deactivates Cycliophora. sent7: something does not cascade homogeny and does not deactivate Cycliophora if it is a kind of a raree-show. sent8: there is something such that it deactivates euphonium. sent9: the mutineer is natal. sent10: the fact that either the antheridiophore is a leatherleaf or it is not a kind of a mescal or both is incorrect if it does cascade revivalism. sent11: if the freshman does cascade revivalism then the fact that the Down is not a leatherleaf and it is not a mescal is wrong. sent12: the antheridiophore is natal. sent13: the droshky is not a mescal. sent14: there exists something such that it is natal. sent15: if the antheridiophore is a kind of a convention then the droshky is not a mescal. sent16: if the antheridiophore is a convention the droshky is not a mescal and is a kind of a convention. sent17: the antheridiophore is natal if the fiddlehead deactivates euphonium. sent18: the mutineer is natal if a convention does deactivate euphonium. sent19: the freshman does cascade revivalism if it does not cascade homogeny and does not deactivate Cycliophora.
the droshky is not a convention.
$hypothesis$ = the droshky is a convention. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is natal and it does deactivate euphonium then the antheridiophore is a convention. sent2: that something does not cascade revivalism and is a mescal is false if it cascades homogeny. sent3: the fact that something is not natal and deactivates euphonium is false if it is a leatherleaf. sent4: the droshky confederates droshky and is a taffy. sent5: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a convention and it does deactivate euphonium is not false. sent6: everything cascades homogeny and deactivates Cycliophora. sent7: something does not cascade homogeny and does not deactivate Cycliophora if it is a kind of a raree-show. sent8: there is something such that it deactivates euphonium. sent9: the mutineer is natal. sent10: the fact that either the antheridiophore is a leatherleaf or it is not a kind of a mescal or both is incorrect if it does cascade revivalism. sent11: if the freshman does cascade revivalism then the fact that the Down is not a leatherleaf and it is not a mescal is wrong. sent12: the antheridiophore is natal. sent13: the droshky is not a mescal. sent14: there exists something such that it is natal. sent15: if the antheridiophore is a kind of a convention then the droshky is not a mescal. sent16: if the antheridiophore is a convention the droshky is not a mescal and is a kind of a convention. sent17: the antheridiophore is natal if the fiddlehead deactivates euphonium. sent18: the mutineer is natal if a convention does deactivate euphonium. sent19: the freshman does cascade revivalism if it does not cascade homogeny and does not deactivate Cycliophora. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__