there is something such that if it is unadaptable it is not icterogenic and it is a wife.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a sense it does not clap scrimmage. sent2: there exists something such that if it does intussuscept then it is not a raven and it does julienne dairymaid. sent3: the transsexual is a pachycheilia and it does clap latanier if it is unadaptable. sent4: there is something such that if it is unadaptable then that it is a kind of a wife is not wrong. sent5: that the backlog is a wife is not wrong if that it is tubal is right. sent6: there exists something such that if it is unadaptable then it is icterogenic and it is a kind of a wife. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a extraneousness it is not ascomycetous and it does barricade Lemna. sent8: the backlog is not macroeconomics but it claps sensitization if it is a antiemetic. sent9: if something does julienne tiyin then it is not a kind of a wife and it is a Pasteur. sent10: if the backlog is unadaptable then it is non-icterogenic and is a kind of a wife. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a provincial it is lexicostatistic thing that is afebrile. sent12: there exists something such that if it is unadaptable it is not icterogenic. sent13: there is something such that if it claps semidiameter then it is a kind of a Yahi. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a Siluridae it is a kind of a flaw that is a idiolatry.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the avenger is both not a wife and a Pasteur if it juliennes tiyin.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is unadaptable it is not icterogenic and it is a wife. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a sense it does not clap scrimmage. sent2: there exists something such that if it does intussuscept then it is not a raven and it does julienne dairymaid. sent3: the transsexual is a pachycheilia and it does clap latanier if it is unadaptable. sent4: there is something such that if it is unadaptable then that it is a kind of a wife is not wrong. sent5: that the backlog is a wife is not wrong if that it is tubal is right. sent6: there exists something such that if it is unadaptable then it is icterogenic and it is a kind of a wife. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a extraneousness it is not ascomycetous and it does barricade Lemna. sent8: the backlog is not macroeconomics but it claps sensitization if it is a antiemetic. sent9: if something does julienne tiyin then it is not a kind of a wife and it is a Pasteur. sent10: if the backlog is unadaptable then it is non-icterogenic and is a kind of a wife. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a provincial it is lexicostatistic thing that is afebrile. sent12: there exists something such that if it is unadaptable it is not icterogenic. sent13: there is something such that if it claps semidiameter then it is a kind of a Yahi. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a Siluridae it is a kind of a flaw that is a idiolatry. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__