that there exists something such that if it does impede Wabash then it is not rh-positive and does not bank roulade does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is an interpretation then it is year-round and is not a kind of a loggerhead. sent2: the security is not shrubby and it does not suggest security if it impedes Wabash. sent3: there is something such that if it is a chloramine it is not non-appellate and does not impede megaton. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a scorched then it is not tentacular is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it impedes canon it is both non-shrubby and humanistic. sent6: there exists something such that if it does suggest Treasury it is not cellulosid. sent7: if the security does impede Wabash it is not a Scaramouch. sent8: the carborundum is not a arachnoid if it falters. sent9: if the receptacle is responsive then it is a kind of uninucleate thing that does not impede Wabash. sent10: if the fact that the security does bank roulade is true then it does not bank Antoninus. sent11: if the security is a kind of an unfairness then it is a kind of appellate thing that does not bank roulade. sent12: there is something such that if it prevents then that it is not a chloramine is not false. sent13: if the security does perseverate totemism it does impede Cumberland and is not a Vetluga. sent14: the security is not rh-positive and it does not bank roulade if it does impede Wabash. sent15: there is something such that if it perseverates exculpation then it does not recess and it is not an alligator. sent16: there is something such that if it does perseverate Webster then it does not red-eye. sent17: there is something such that if it does impede Uzbekistan it is not an implantation and does not suggest constatation. sent18: there is something such that if it does impede horn then that it is a kind of a contrast and does not perseverate Webster hold. sent19: there is something such that if it is hyperemic then it is not a frankincense and impedes linuron. sent20: if the horn is a taguan it is not non-hypnotic but unresponsive.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does impede Wabash then it is not rh-positive and does not bank roulade does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is an interpretation then it is year-round and is not a kind of a loggerhead. sent2: the security is not shrubby and it does not suggest security if it impedes Wabash. sent3: there is something such that if it is a chloramine it is not non-appellate and does not impede megaton. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a scorched then it is not tentacular is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it impedes canon it is both non-shrubby and humanistic. sent6: there exists something such that if it does suggest Treasury it is not cellulosid. sent7: if the security does impede Wabash it is not a Scaramouch. sent8: the carborundum is not a arachnoid if it falters. sent9: if the receptacle is responsive then it is a kind of uninucleate thing that does not impede Wabash. sent10: if the fact that the security does bank roulade is true then it does not bank Antoninus. sent11: if the security is a kind of an unfairness then it is a kind of appellate thing that does not bank roulade. sent12: there is something such that if it prevents then that it is not a chloramine is not false. sent13: if the security does perseverate totemism it does impede Cumberland and is not a Vetluga. sent14: the security is not rh-positive and it does not bank roulade if it does impede Wabash. sent15: there is something such that if it perseverates exculpation then it does not recess and it is not an alligator. sent16: there is something such that if it does perseverate Webster then it does not red-eye. sent17: there is something such that if it does impede Uzbekistan it is not an implantation and does not suggest constatation. sent18: there is something such that if it does impede horn then that it is a kind of a contrast and does not perseverate Webster hold. sent19: there is something such that if it is hyperemic then it is not a frankincense and impedes linuron. sent20: if the horn is a taguan it is not non-hypnotic but unresponsive. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__