the jamming happens.
sent1: the placation occurs and the lumbosacralness occurs if the disciplinariness does not occur. sent2: that that the aluminousness but not the marathon happens hold triggers the eulogizing spikemoss. sent3: the impasto does not occur. sent4: the subclavianness occurs but the disinfection does not occur. sent5: the aluminousness occurs. sent6: the rendering nazi does not occur. sent7: the stifling foxglove and the splatting happens. sent8: that the eulogizing spikemoss occurs and the jam occurs results in that the Hippocraticness does not occur. sent9: the Hippocraticness and the liberalization occurs. sent10: both the liberalization and the cometariness happens if the occasioning does not occur. sent11: if the placation occurs the mud-brickness but not the occasioning occurs. sent12: the eulogizing spikemoss does not occur but the Hippocraticness happens if the liberalization does not occur. sent13: the achenialness does not occur. sent14: the tapping and the heaving occurs. sent15: the IV happens. sent16: if the lumbosacralness occurs then the non-mud-brickness and the placation occurs. sent17: both the non-disciplinaryness and the deconstructionistness happens if the degrading does not occur. sent18: that both the eulogizing spikemoss and the non-Hippocraticness occurs triggers that the jam happens. sent19: the aluminousness but not the marathon happens. sent20: the placation occurs. sent21: the fact that the postnatalness does not occur hold. sent22: that the cometariness happens and the occasion occurs does not hold if the mud-brickness does not occur. sent23: that the liberalization happens is correct. sent24: the paniculateness and the jamming happens if the eulogizing spikemoss does not occur.
sent2 & sent19 -> int1: the eulogizing spikemoss happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jam happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the eulogizing spikemoss and the jam happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the Hippocraticness does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: that the Hippocraticness occurs is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the paniculateness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the jamming happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the placation occurs and the lumbosacralness occurs if the disciplinariness does not occur. sent2: that that the aluminousness but not the marathon happens hold triggers the eulogizing spikemoss. sent3: the impasto does not occur. sent4: the subclavianness occurs but the disinfection does not occur. sent5: the aluminousness occurs. sent6: the rendering nazi does not occur. sent7: the stifling foxglove and the splatting happens. sent8: that the eulogizing spikemoss occurs and the jam occurs results in that the Hippocraticness does not occur. sent9: the Hippocraticness and the liberalization occurs. sent10: both the liberalization and the cometariness happens if the occasioning does not occur. sent11: if the placation occurs the mud-brickness but not the occasioning occurs. sent12: the eulogizing spikemoss does not occur but the Hippocraticness happens if the liberalization does not occur. sent13: the achenialness does not occur. sent14: the tapping and the heaving occurs. sent15: the IV happens. sent16: if the lumbosacralness occurs then the non-mud-brickness and the placation occurs. sent17: both the non-disciplinaryness and the deconstructionistness happens if the degrading does not occur. sent18: that both the eulogizing spikemoss and the non-Hippocraticness occurs triggers that the jam happens. sent19: the aluminousness but not the marathon happens. sent20: the placation occurs. sent21: the fact that the postnatalness does not occur hold. sent22: that the cometariness happens and the occasion occurs does not hold if the mud-brickness does not occur. sent23: that the liberalization happens is correct. sent24: the paniculateness and the jamming happens if the eulogizing spikemoss does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent19 -> int1: the eulogizing spikemoss happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jam happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the eulogizing spikemoss and the jam happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the Hippocraticness does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: that the Hippocraticness occurs is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__