not the cropping but the multiphaseness happens.
sent1: that the leveling occurs but the repressing Jansenism does not occur triggers the archery. sent2: the pink is caused by that the repressing Jansenism happens. sent3: the unlivableness occurs. sent4: that not the cropping but the multiphaseness happens is brought about by that the Britishness does not occur. sent5: if the repressing Jansenism happens that not the crop but the multiphaseness occurs does not hold. sent6: the repressing Jansenism does not occur if the fact that the tottering does not occur and the beggaring palimpsest does not occur is not right. sent7: the fact that the fact that the leveling but not the unlivableness happens is true does not hold if the archery does not occur. sent8: the catalepticness occurs and the beggaring sultriness occurs. sent9: the level happens and the poker occurs. sent10: the overindulgence occurs and the polemics happens. sent11: the fact that the harassment does not occur and the sacrament does not occur is correct. sent12: the hostilities occurs. sent13: the non-Britishness is triggered by that both the unlivableness and the archery occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tottering does not occur and the beggaring palimpsest does not occur.; sent10 -> int1: the overindulgence occurs.; sent9 -> int2: the leveling occurs.;
the pink happens.
$hypothesis$ = not the cropping but the multiphaseness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the leveling occurs but the repressing Jansenism does not occur triggers the archery. sent2: the pink is caused by that the repressing Jansenism happens. sent3: the unlivableness occurs. sent4: that not the cropping but the multiphaseness happens is brought about by that the Britishness does not occur. sent5: if the repressing Jansenism happens that not the crop but the multiphaseness occurs does not hold. sent6: the repressing Jansenism does not occur if the fact that the tottering does not occur and the beggaring palimpsest does not occur is not right. sent7: the fact that the fact that the leveling but not the unlivableness happens is true does not hold if the archery does not occur. sent8: the catalepticness occurs and the beggaring sultriness occurs. sent9: the level happens and the poker occurs. sent10: the overindulgence occurs and the polemics happens. sent11: the fact that the harassment does not occur and the sacrament does not occur is correct. sent12: the hostilities occurs. sent13: the non-Britishness is triggered by that both the unlivableness and the archery occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tottering does not occur and the beggaring palimpsest does not occur.; sent10 -> int1: the overindulgence occurs.; sent9 -> int2: the leveling occurs.; __UNKNOWN__