the fact that the grand is not a kind of a zero but it hitches is wrong.
sent1: that the melanin is a pomology but not a moquette does not hold. sent2: the intron is a niobite if the shrink-wrap is not a kind of a pomology. sent3: if the shrink-wrap is a kind of a pomology the fact that the fact that the melanin is not a kind of a pomology and it is not a moquette is not incorrect does not hold. sent4: the fact that that the grand zeroes and it does hitch is not incorrect does not hold. sent5: if the intron is a kind of a Adiantum then it is a kind of a covey. sent6: the intron is a kind of a pond-skater. sent7: if the cowberry is a chenille then that the grand zeroes and it is a hitch is not correct. sent8: the cowberry is a chenille if the melanin is a pomology. sent9: that the grand does not zero and does hitch is wrong if the cowberry is a chenille. sent10: a Adiantum is a kind of a covey. sent11: the intron is both a pond-skater and a Adiantum. sent12: if the fact that the melanin is not a kind of a pomology and is not a kind of a moquette is not correct the cowberry is a chenille. sent13: the grand is a pomology if the shrink-wrap is not a hitch. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of a covey and does not efface headshake is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of a niobite is not true. sent15: if the shrink-wrap is a pomology the fact that the melanin is both a pomology and not a moquette is not right. sent16: the intron is a kind of a covey. sent17: something is a covey but it does not efface headshake if it is a Adiantum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shrink-wrap is not a pomology.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the intron is a niobite.; sent14 -> int2: that the intron is a covey and does not efface headshake does not hold if it is a niobite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the intron is a covey but it does not efface headshake is false.; sent17 -> int4: the intron is a covey and does not efface headshake if it is a Adiantum.; sent11 -> int5: the intron is a Adiantum.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the intron is a covey that does not efface headshake.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the shrink-wrap is a kind of a pomology.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the melanin is not a kind of a pomology and is not a moquette is not true.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the cowberry is a chenille.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the grand is not a kind of a zero but it hitches is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the melanin is a pomology but not a moquette does not hold. sent2: the intron is a niobite if the shrink-wrap is not a kind of a pomology. sent3: if the shrink-wrap is a kind of a pomology the fact that the fact that the melanin is not a kind of a pomology and it is not a moquette is not incorrect does not hold. sent4: the fact that that the grand zeroes and it does hitch is not incorrect does not hold. sent5: if the intron is a kind of a Adiantum then it is a kind of a covey. sent6: the intron is a kind of a pond-skater. sent7: if the cowberry is a chenille then that the grand zeroes and it is a hitch is not correct. sent8: the cowberry is a chenille if the melanin is a pomology. sent9: that the grand does not zero and does hitch is wrong if the cowberry is a chenille. sent10: a Adiantum is a kind of a covey. sent11: the intron is both a pond-skater and a Adiantum. sent12: if the fact that the melanin is not a kind of a pomology and is not a kind of a moquette is not correct the cowberry is a chenille. sent13: the grand is a pomology if the shrink-wrap is not a hitch. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of a covey and does not efface headshake is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of a niobite is not true. sent15: if the shrink-wrap is a pomology the fact that the melanin is both a pomology and not a moquette is not right. sent16: the intron is a kind of a covey. sent17: something is a covey but it does not efface headshake if it is a Adiantum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shrink-wrap is not a pomology.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the intron is a niobite.; sent14 -> int2: that the intron is a covey and does not efface headshake does not hold if it is a niobite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the intron is a covey but it does not efface headshake is false.; sent17 -> int4: the intron is a covey and does not efface headshake if it is a Adiantum.; sent11 -> int5: the intron is a Adiantum.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the intron is a covey that does not efface headshake.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the shrink-wrap is a kind of a pomology.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the melanin is not a kind of a pomology and is not a moquette is not true.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the cowberry is a chenille.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__