the detumescence does not reflect catalufa.
sent1: something does not result digraph but it is Chian. sent2: the oxtail is a kind of a whippersnapper. sent3: if a non-leptorrhine thing is a kind of a Molotov then it does result iridectomy. sent4: if the tile is not immiscible it is not leptorrhine but a Molotov. sent5: something does not result mnemonics but it does domesticate. sent6: the oxtail is a kind of a bottler. sent7: something is not a bottler and does entrain. sent8: there is something such that it is a bottler. sent9: the detumescence is a Molotov if something that does not result iridectomy is a bottler. sent10: the sphere reflects catalufa. sent11: if something is a Molotov then it reflects catalufa. sent12: the tile wakes choo-choo and is placental. sent13: if the detumescence is a kind of a bottler that does reflect catalufa then the oxtail does not entrain. sent14: if there are non-immiscible things the tile is not leptorrhine. sent15: the oxtail does entrain. sent16: if the oxtail is a whippersnapper and it entrains then the tile does not result iridectomy. sent17: there exists something such that that it is not a Konqueror but immiscible does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that it is not a Konqueror and it is immiscible. sent19: something does not result iridectomy. sent20: there is something such that that it is both immiscible and a Konqueror is not true. sent21: there is something such that it results iridectomy and is a bottler. sent22: there is something such that that it is a Konqueror and is immiscible is incorrect. sent23: the tile is not leptorrhine if there is something such that that it is not a Konqueror and it is immiscible is incorrect. sent24: the fact that something is not a whippersnapper but it reflects catalufa is not true if it does not entrain. sent25: something is a kind of a bottler if it is not leptorrhine. sent26: something does not reflect catalufa but it is a kind of a whippersnapper if it does not entrain.
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the oxtail is a kind of a whippersnapper that does entrain.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the tile does not result iridectomy.; sent25 -> int3: if the tile is not leptorrhine it is a bottler.; sent17 & sent23 -> int4: the tile is not leptorrhine.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tile is a bottler.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the tile does not result iridectomy but it is a bottler.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not result iridectomy and it is a bottler.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the detumescence is a Molotov.; sent11 -> int9: the detumescence reflects catalufa if it is a Molotov.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the detumescence does not reflect catalufa.
sent26 -> int10: if the detumescence does not entrain it does not reflect catalufa and is a kind of a whippersnapper.; sent3 -> int11: the tile results iridectomy if it is not leptorrhine but a Molotov.;
$hypothesis$ = the detumescence does not reflect catalufa. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not result digraph but it is Chian. sent2: the oxtail is a kind of a whippersnapper. sent3: if a non-leptorrhine thing is a kind of a Molotov then it does result iridectomy. sent4: if the tile is not immiscible it is not leptorrhine but a Molotov. sent5: something does not result mnemonics but it does domesticate. sent6: the oxtail is a kind of a bottler. sent7: something is not a bottler and does entrain. sent8: there is something such that it is a bottler. sent9: the detumescence is a Molotov if something that does not result iridectomy is a bottler. sent10: the sphere reflects catalufa. sent11: if something is a Molotov then it reflects catalufa. sent12: the tile wakes choo-choo and is placental. sent13: if the detumescence is a kind of a bottler that does reflect catalufa then the oxtail does not entrain. sent14: if there are non-immiscible things the tile is not leptorrhine. sent15: the oxtail does entrain. sent16: if the oxtail is a whippersnapper and it entrains then the tile does not result iridectomy. sent17: there exists something such that that it is not a Konqueror but immiscible does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that it is not a Konqueror and it is immiscible. sent19: something does not result iridectomy. sent20: there is something such that that it is both immiscible and a Konqueror is not true. sent21: there is something such that it results iridectomy and is a bottler. sent22: there is something such that that it is a Konqueror and is immiscible is incorrect. sent23: the tile is not leptorrhine if there is something such that that it is not a Konqueror and it is immiscible is incorrect. sent24: the fact that something is not a whippersnapper but it reflects catalufa is not true if it does not entrain. sent25: something is a kind of a bottler if it is not leptorrhine. sent26: something does not reflect catalufa but it is a kind of a whippersnapper if it does not entrain. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the oxtail is a kind of a whippersnapper that does entrain.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the tile does not result iridectomy.; sent25 -> int3: if the tile is not leptorrhine it is a bottler.; sent17 & sent23 -> int4: the tile is not leptorrhine.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tile is a bottler.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the tile does not result iridectomy but it is a bottler.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not result iridectomy and it is a bottler.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the detumescence is a Molotov.; sent11 -> int9: the detumescence reflects catalufa if it is a Molotov.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__