that the crusting dynamometer does not occur results in that the harmlessness but not the washup occurs.
sent1: that the direction happens leads to that the harmlessness happens and the washup does not occur. sent2: if the crusting dynamometer does not occur both the direction and the sunshine occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crusting dynamometer does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the direction and the sunshine occurs.; int1 -> int2: the direction occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the harmlessness but not the washup occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the crusting dynamometer does not occur results in that the harmlessness but not the washup occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the direction happens leads to that the harmlessness happens and the washup does not occur. sent2: if the crusting dynamometer does not occur both the direction and the sunshine occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crusting dynamometer does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the direction and the sunshine occurs.; int1 -> int2: the direction occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the harmlessness but not the washup occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__