the fact that the twinkle does not occur and the relation occurs is not correct.
sent1: the craps does not occur and the wattage occurs. sent2: that the pelting does not occur brings about that the dinging warrior occurs and the annexation occurs. sent3: the headquartering Holly occurs. sent4: the dinging acupuncture occurs. sent5: the substantiating happens if the fact that the dinging acupuncture does not occur but the lashing occurs does not hold. sent6: the dinging rabbi occurs and the metallicness happens. sent7: the pelting does not occur. sent8: the substantiating happens if the fact that the lashing does not occur is right. sent9: the fact that the lashing occurs hold. sent10: the fact that the spirometry occurs hold. sent11: that the dinging warrior occurs prevents that the acronymicness occurs. sent12: if the substantiating occurs the outgeneraling antiproton happens. sent13: that both the non-yogisticness and the headquartering Indra occurs is not correct. sent14: the headquartering Holly occurs if the acronymicness does not occur. sent15: the cricketing happens and the thermionicness happens if the objecting CEO does not occur. sent16: the twinkling does not occur if the competition occurs. sent17: either that the outgeneraling antiproton occurs or that the competition occurs or both prevents that the twinkling occurs. sent18: the annexation happens. sent19: if the acronymicness does not occur the headquartering Holly happens and the relation occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the dinging acupuncture but the lashing occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the dinging acupuncture does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dinging acupuncture does not occur and the lashing occurs is not true.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the substantiating occurs.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the outgeneraling antiproton occurs.; int5 -> int6: either the outgeneraling antiproton or the competition or both occurs.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the twinkle does not occur.; sent2 & sent7 -> int8: the dinging warrior occurs and the annexation happens.; int8 -> int9: the dinging warrior happens.; sent11 & int9 -> int10: the acronymicness does not occur.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: both the headquartering Holly and the relation happens.; int11 -> int12: the relation occurs.; int7 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the twinkling does not occur and the relation occurs is wrong.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the twinkle does not occur and the relation occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the craps does not occur and the wattage occurs. sent2: that the pelting does not occur brings about that the dinging warrior occurs and the annexation occurs. sent3: the headquartering Holly occurs. sent4: the dinging acupuncture occurs. sent5: the substantiating happens if the fact that the dinging acupuncture does not occur but the lashing occurs does not hold. sent6: the dinging rabbi occurs and the metallicness happens. sent7: the pelting does not occur. sent8: the substantiating happens if the fact that the lashing does not occur is right. sent9: the fact that the lashing occurs hold. sent10: the fact that the spirometry occurs hold. sent11: that the dinging warrior occurs prevents that the acronymicness occurs. sent12: if the substantiating occurs the outgeneraling antiproton happens. sent13: that both the non-yogisticness and the headquartering Indra occurs is not correct. sent14: the headquartering Holly occurs if the acronymicness does not occur. sent15: the cricketing happens and the thermionicness happens if the objecting CEO does not occur. sent16: the twinkling does not occur if the competition occurs. sent17: either that the outgeneraling antiproton occurs or that the competition occurs or both prevents that the twinkling occurs. sent18: the annexation happens. sent19: if the acronymicness does not occur the headquartering Holly happens and the relation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the dinging acupuncture but the lashing occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the dinging acupuncture does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dinging acupuncture does not occur and the lashing occurs is not true.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the substantiating occurs.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the outgeneraling antiproton occurs.; int5 -> int6: either the outgeneraling antiproton or the competition or both occurs.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the twinkle does not occur.; sent2 & sent7 -> int8: the dinging warrior occurs and the annexation happens.; int8 -> int9: the dinging warrior happens.; sent11 & int9 -> int10: the acronymicness does not occur.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: both the headquartering Holly and the relation happens.; int11 -> int12: the relation occurs.; int7 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__