the parapodium is not a dumps.
sent1: if the shingling does foreshow Rynchopidae then the lichen does not foreshow Rynchopidae. sent2: if the letterhead charms then it is not a luxury. sent3: there exists something such that it is fraternal. sent4: that the letterhead is resistive and it is a charming is incorrect. sent5: the parapodium is not a kind of a dumps if the lichen is not alive. sent6: if something that is not a priming does not foreshow Rynchopidae it is not alive. sent7: there exists something such that it is a luxury. sent8: the shingling does foreshow Rynchopidae and it is undomestic if something is not a luxury. sent9: the shingling is not resistive if the letterhead is not undomestic. sent10: the parapodium is not resistive if that it is a dumps and it is non-alive is wrong. sent11: the lichen is not priming and does not foreshow Rynchopidae if the shingling does foreshow Rynchopidae. sent12: something that is non-priming thing that foreshows Rynchopidae is not alive. sent13: the lichen does not foreshow Rynchopidae. sent14: something is not a kind of an eyestrain if the fact that it does foreshow transmigrante and it is not a Gabor does not hold. sent15: if the lichen is a luxury then the fact that the fact that the shingling does not foreshow Rynchopidae and it does not dump is wrong is not false. sent16: if the fact that something is resistive but it is not a charming is wrong then it is not a luxury.
sent16 -> int1: the letterhead is not a kind of a luxury if that it is resistive and it is not a charming does not hold.; sent6 -> int2: if the lichen is not priming and it does not foreshow Rynchopidae then it is not alive.;
the parapodium is a dumps.
$hypothesis$ = the parapodium is not a dumps. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shingling does foreshow Rynchopidae then the lichen does not foreshow Rynchopidae. sent2: if the letterhead charms then it is not a luxury. sent3: there exists something such that it is fraternal. sent4: that the letterhead is resistive and it is a charming is incorrect. sent5: the parapodium is not a kind of a dumps if the lichen is not alive. sent6: if something that is not a priming does not foreshow Rynchopidae it is not alive. sent7: there exists something such that it is a luxury. sent8: the shingling does foreshow Rynchopidae and it is undomestic if something is not a luxury. sent9: the shingling is not resistive if the letterhead is not undomestic. sent10: the parapodium is not resistive if that it is a dumps and it is non-alive is wrong. sent11: the lichen is not priming and does not foreshow Rynchopidae if the shingling does foreshow Rynchopidae. sent12: something that is non-priming thing that foreshows Rynchopidae is not alive. sent13: the lichen does not foreshow Rynchopidae. sent14: something is not a kind of an eyestrain if the fact that it does foreshow transmigrante and it is not a Gabor does not hold. sent15: if the lichen is a luxury then the fact that the fact that the shingling does not foreshow Rynchopidae and it does not dump is wrong is not false. sent16: if the fact that something is resistive but it is not a charming is wrong then it is not a luxury. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the letterhead is not a kind of a luxury if that it is resistive and it is not a charming does not hold.; sent6 -> int2: if the lichen is not priming and it does not foreshow Rynchopidae then it is not alive.; __UNKNOWN__