the convolution does not occur.
sent1: if the condemning Sikorsky does not occur then the bruxism occurs and the convolution occurs. sent2: the bruxism and the condemning Sikorsky happens. sent3: the circumvention happens. sent4: the choreographicness happens. sent5: the demoticness does not occur if the choreographicness occurs and the bruxism occurs. sent6: the forgiveness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the ECM does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the fact that the rationalisticness does not occur is not incorrect if the stabbing amphibia occurs and the civility happens. sent9: the condemning Sikorsky happens. sent10: the empiricalness does not occur.
sent2 -> int1: the bruxism occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the choreographicness happens and the bruxism happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the demoticness does not occur.;
that the convolution happens is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the convolution does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the condemning Sikorsky does not occur then the bruxism occurs and the convolution occurs. sent2: the bruxism and the condemning Sikorsky happens. sent3: the circumvention happens. sent4: the choreographicness happens. sent5: the demoticness does not occur if the choreographicness occurs and the bruxism occurs. sent6: the forgiveness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the ECM does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the fact that the rationalisticness does not occur is not incorrect if the stabbing amphibia occurs and the civility happens. sent9: the condemning Sikorsky happens. sent10: the empiricalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the bruxism occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the choreographicness happens and the bruxism happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the demoticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__