the kenaf is not a dissolution.
sent1: if the cup does stint lower and wrestles sacredness the jowl does not stint lower. sent2: the pan does not wrestle Gogol if the jowl is a projection. sent3: if something is not a projection that that it grafts or is not palpebrate or both is not wrong does not hold. sent4: something does stint lower and it wrestles sacredness if it does not stint goad. sent5: the jowl is a acebutolol and it is a nebule. sent6: if the fact that the pan stints tankage and stints lower does not hold it does not stints tankage. sent7: if the pan is a projection the fact that the jowl does wrestle Gogol or is not operational or both is not correct. sent8: the jowl is a dissolution. sent9: the goldfields is a acebutolol. sent10: something does wrestle sacredness if it wrestles Wheatstone. sent11: the fact that something is not a kind of a dissolution and stints jack-o'-lantern is not right if it does not stint tankage. sent12: the kenaf is a dissolution if there is something such that the fact that it does wrestle Gogol and/or it is not operational is not right. sent13: something does not stint lower and/or it does not stint goad if that it wrestles sacredness is not wrong. sent14: if the pan does not stint lower then the constantan does not stint tankage. sent15: the goldfields does wrestle Wheatstone. sent16: if the fact that something is not a dissolution and stints jack-o'-lantern does not hold the fact that it is not a kind of a projection is correct. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it either does wrestle Gogol or is operational or both does not hold the fact that the kenaf is a dissolution is right. sent18: the pan is a projection. sent19: if the jowl is a acebutolol then the pan does wrestle Wheatstone. sent20: the cup does not stint goad if the goldfields wrestles Wheatstone and it is a acebutolol. sent21: the corn is a kind of a projection. sent22: something is a kind of a projection but it does not stint jack-o'-lantern if it does not stint tankage.
sent7 & sent18 -> int1: the fact that the jowl does wrestle Gogol and/or is not operational is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it either does wrestle Gogol or is not operational or both is not correct.; int2 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the kenaf is not a dissolution.
sent22 -> int3: if the pan does not stint tankage then it is a projection and does not stint jack-o'-lantern.; sent4 -> int4: the cup stints lower and it does wrestle sacredness if it does not stint goad.; sent15 & sent9 -> int5: the goldfields does wrestle Wheatstone and it is a acebutolol.; sent20 & int5 -> int6: the cup does not stint goad.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the cup stints lower and does wrestle sacredness.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the jowl does not stint lower.; int8 -> int9: something does not stint lower.;
$hypothesis$ = the kenaf is not a dissolution. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cup does stint lower and wrestles sacredness the jowl does not stint lower. sent2: the pan does not wrestle Gogol if the jowl is a projection. sent3: if something is not a projection that that it grafts or is not palpebrate or both is not wrong does not hold. sent4: something does stint lower and it wrestles sacredness if it does not stint goad. sent5: the jowl is a acebutolol and it is a nebule. sent6: if the fact that the pan stints tankage and stints lower does not hold it does not stints tankage. sent7: if the pan is a projection the fact that the jowl does wrestle Gogol or is not operational or both is not correct. sent8: the jowl is a dissolution. sent9: the goldfields is a acebutolol. sent10: something does wrestle sacredness if it wrestles Wheatstone. sent11: the fact that something is not a kind of a dissolution and stints jack-o'-lantern is not right if it does not stint tankage. sent12: the kenaf is a dissolution if there is something such that the fact that it does wrestle Gogol and/or it is not operational is not right. sent13: something does not stint lower and/or it does not stint goad if that it wrestles sacredness is not wrong. sent14: if the pan does not stint lower then the constantan does not stint tankage. sent15: the goldfields does wrestle Wheatstone. sent16: if the fact that something is not a dissolution and stints jack-o'-lantern does not hold the fact that it is not a kind of a projection is correct. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it either does wrestle Gogol or is operational or both does not hold the fact that the kenaf is a dissolution is right. sent18: the pan is a projection. sent19: if the jowl is a acebutolol then the pan does wrestle Wheatstone. sent20: the cup does not stint goad if the goldfields wrestles Wheatstone and it is a acebutolol. sent21: the corn is a kind of a projection. sent22: something is a kind of a projection but it does not stint jack-o'-lantern if it does not stint tankage. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent18 -> int1: the fact that the jowl does wrestle Gogol and/or is not operational is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it either does wrestle Gogol or is not operational or both is not correct.; int2 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__