that both the pinking Bronte and the doctoralness happens if the pinking snake does not occur does not hold.
sent1: that the viatication occurs triggers that the intellectualness does not occur but the doctoralness occurs. sent2: if the famine does not occur the viatication happens and the naming interferon happens. sent3: the naming fastness does not occur. sent4: that the emergency occurs but the naming cayenne does not occur is not right if the voyage occurs. sent5: the involution and the boring happens if the emergency does not occur. sent6: both the ballet and the Labour occurs. sent7: that both the pinking Bronte and the doctoralness occurs is brought about by the pinking snake. sent8: the famine does not occur if the fact that the naming loop-line does not occur but the famine happens is not correct. sent9: if the mollification happens and the tetanus happens the awaking happens. sent10: if the defect but not the stating happens then the pinking Bronte occurs. sent11: the fact that the thoughtfulness does not occur is not false. sent12: if the pinking carpenter does not occur then the voyage and the accessibleness occurs. sent13: the exclaiming happens if the boring happens. sent14: if that the emergency but not the naming cayenne occurs is not correct then the emergency does not occur. sent15: the doctoralness happens. sent16: that the pinking Bronte does not occur is brought about by that not the intellectualness but the doctoralness occurs. sent17: that the defect but not the stating occurs is triggered by that the pinking snake does not occur. sent18: the tormenting caladium does not occur. sent19: the branching does not occur. sent20: the fact that not the naming loop-line but the famine occurs is not true if the fact that the exclaiming occurs is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pinking snake does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the defecting happens but the state does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the pinking Bronte happens.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the pinking Bronte and the doctoralness occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the reopening happens.
$hypothesis$ = that both the pinking Bronte and the doctoralness happens if the pinking snake does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the viatication occurs triggers that the intellectualness does not occur but the doctoralness occurs. sent2: if the famine does not occur the viatication happens and the naming interferon happens. sent3: the naming fastness does not occur. sent4: that the emergency occurs but the naming cayenne does not occur is not right if the voyage occurs. sent5: the involution and the boring happens if the emergency does not occur. sent6: both the ballet and the Labour occurs. sent7: that both the pinking Bronte and the doctoralness occurs is brought about by the pinking snake. sent8: the famine does not occur if the fact that the naming loop-line does not occur but the famine happens is not correct. sent9: if the mollification happens and the tetanus happens the awaking happens. sent10: if the defect but not the stating happens then the pinking Bronte occurs. sent11: the fact that the thoughtfulness does not occur is not false. sent12: if the pinking carpenter does not occur then the voyage and the accessibleness occurs. sent13: the exclaiming happens if the boring happens. sent14: if that the emergency but not the naming cayenne occurs is not correct then the emergency does not occur. sent15: the doctoralness happens. sent16: that the pinking Bronte does not occur is brought about by that not the intellectualness but the doctoralness occurs. sent17: that the defect but not the stating occurs is triggered by that the pinking snake does not occur. sent18: the tormenting caladium does not occur. sent19: the branching does not occur. sent20: the fact that not the naming loop-line but the famine occurs is not true if the fact that the exclaiming occurs is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pinking snake does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the defecting happens but the state does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the pinking Bronte happens.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the pinking Bronte and the doctoralness occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__