the storminess does not jam teredo.
sent1: if something is a subpoena it is not lumbosacral. sent2: the congealment is a subpoena if the wallflower jams congealment. sent3: if the congealment is not lumbosacral then that the storminess jams teredo hold. sent4: The congealment does jam wallflower. sent5: the wallflower does jam congealment.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the congealment is a subpoena.; sent1 -> int2: the congealment is not lumbosacral if it is a subpoena.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the congealment is not lumbosacral is true.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the storminess does not jam teredo. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a subpoena it is not lumbosacral. sent2: the congealment is a subpoena if the wallflower jams congealment. sent3: if the congealment is not lumbosacral then that the storminess jams teredo hold. sent4: The congealment does jam wallflower. sent5: the wallflower does jam congealment. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the congealment is a subpoena.; sent1 -> int2: the congealment is not lumbosacral if it is a subpoena.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the congealment is not lumbosacral is true.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__