there exists something such that if the fact that it does not weed transubstantiation and it is yogistic does not hold then it is not a masjid.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not myopathic but accessional is false then it is not a pica. sent2: the fact that the mantispid is not a masjid is not false if that it does not weed transubstantiation and it is not non-yogistic is not correct. sent3: if the mantispid does not weed transubstantiation but it is yogistic then it is not a masjid. sent4: if that something is non-Rosicrucian but it is a burdened does not hold then it is not yogistic. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it weeds transubstantiation and is yogistic is not right then it is not a masjid. sent6: if the fact that the mantispid is not a Cuban but a cliff-brake is not true it does not weed transubstantiation. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not weed transubstantiation and it is yogistic then it is not a masjid. sent8: that the mantispid is a kind of the masjid if that the mantispid does not weed transubstantiation but it is yogistic is false is correct. sent9: there is something such that if it is not surficial then it does not corner rabbinate. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that that it is not non-epidemic and it is a sundew hold is not true it is not a kind of a Actinidia. sent11: the mantispid is not a kind of a wordbook if it is not numerate. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not yogistic then it is not a masjid.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if that the splay is non-Rosicrucian and is a burdened does not hold it is not yogistic.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not weed transubstantiation and it is yogistic does not hold then it is not a masjid. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not myopathic but accessional is false then it is not a pica. sent2: the fact that the mantispid is not a masjid is not false if that it does not weed transubstantiation and it is not non-yogistic is not correct. sent3: if the mantispid does not weed transubstantiation but it is yogistic then it is not a masjid. sent4: if that something is non-Rosicrucian but it is a burdened does not hold then it is not yogistic. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it weeds transubstantiation and is yogistic is not right then it is not a masjid. sent6: if the fact that the mantispid is not a Cuban but a cliff-brake is not true it does not weed transubstantiation. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not weed transubstantiation and it is yogistic then it is not a masjid. sent8: that the mantispid is a kind of the masjid if that the mantispid does not weed transubstantiation but it is yogistic is false is correct. sent9: there is something such that if it is not surficial then it does not corner rabbinate. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that that it is not non-epidemic and it is a sundew hold is not true it is not a kind of a Actinidia. sent11: the mantispid is not a kind of a wordbook if it is not numerate. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not yogistic then it is not a masjid. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__