the changer is effortless.
sent1: if something is a Hemofil then it is a kind of a handspike. sent2: the changer is effortless if the repertory does philander Daucus. sent3: if the mangabey is not consolable that that it is not a kind of a puritan and it philanders Daucus is correct is incorrect. sent4: something is a treatment if it is gestational. sent5: if something is a handspike that it is not a oriflamme or it is not a inapplicability or both is not true. sent6: if something is not a handspike then it is not effortless. sent7: the repertory does philander Daucus if it is not aeromechanics and it is offing. sent8: if the mangabey is a treatment then it is a kind of a oriflamme. sent9: the mangabey is a treatment if that it is not a kind of a puritan and does philander Daucus does not hold. sent10: the repertory is a Hemofil if that it is not aeromechanics and it is offing does not hold. sent11: if the fact that either the repertory is not a oriflamme or it is not a inapplicability or both does not hold it is a kind of a treatment. sent12: the repertory is not a treatment.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the repertory is not aeromechanics but offing is incorrect.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the repertory is a Hemofil is correct.; sent1 -> int2: the repertory is a handspike if it is a Hemofil.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the repertory is a handspike.; sent5 -> int4: that that the repertory is not a oriflamme and/or is not a inapplicability is not right is true if it is a handspike.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the repertory is not a oriflamme and/or it is not a inapplicability is false.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the repertory is a treatment.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the repertory is not aeromechanics but it is offing is not incorrect.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the repertory does philander Daucus.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the changer is not effortless.
sent6 -> int10: the changer is not effortless if that it is not a kind of a handspike is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the changer is effortless. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Hemofil then it is a kind of a handspike. sent2: the changer is effortless if the repertory does philander Daucus. sent3: if the mangabey is not consolable that that it is not a kind of a puritan and it philanders Daucus is correct is incorrect. sent4: something is a treatment if it is gestational. sent5: if something is a handspike that it is not a oriflamme or it is not a inapplicability or both is not true. sent6: if something is not a handspike then it is not effortless. sent7: the repertory does philander Daucus if it is not aeromechanics and it is offing. sent8: if the mangabey is a treatment then it is a kind of a oriflamme. sent9: the mangabey is a treatment if that it is not a kind of a puritan and does philander Daucus does not hold. sent10: the repertory is a Hemofil if that it is not aeromechanics and it is offing does not hold. sent11: if the fact that either the repertory is not a oriflamme or it is not a inapplicability or both does not hold it is a kind of a treatment. sent12: the repertory is not a treatment. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the repertory is not aeromechanics but offing is incorrect.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the repertory is a Hemofil is correct.; sent1 -> int2: the repertory is a handspike if it is a Hemofil.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the repertory is a handspike.; sent5 -> int4: that that the repertory is not a oriflamme and/or is not a inapplicability is not right is true if it is a handspike.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the repertory is not a oriflamme and/or it is not a inapplicability is false.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the repertory is a treatment.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the repertory is not aeromechanics but it is offing is not incorrect.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the repertory does philander Daucus.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__