the jewels-of-opar is not a undesirability.
sent1: the zymase is not burrlike and/or it does not patrol Ticino. sent2: the fact that the woodhewer does support is correct if the zymase does not acquaint naturalness. sent3: the cinnamon is not a thriller. sent4: something does acquaint naturalness if that it is esoteric and it does not acquaint naturalness is not right. sent5: if the citrange is not a kind of a thriller the woodhewer is not a kind of a thriller and/or it does not acquaint naturalness. sent6: the citrange is not a thriller if the zymase is not a kind of a vaccinee. sent7: if something is burrlike it is esoteric. sent8: the woodhewer is not a kind of a undesirability and/or is not a thriller if it does not acquaint naturalness. sent9: something is a dimethylglyoxime if the fact that it is not esoteric does not hold. sent10: the fact that the citrange is not a kind of a undesirability is not incorrect if it is burrlike and is not a thriller. sent11: the zymase does not snooze and is not a kind of a Carmelite. sent12: the citrange is esoteric. sent13: if the virologist is a dimethylglyoxime the jewels-of-opar is a kind of a undesirability. sent14: if the woodhewer is not a kind of a thriller and/or does not acquaint naturalness the virologist is not non-burrlike. sent15: something that does not snooze does not support or is not a vaccinee or both. sent16: the jewels-of-opar is not Carmelite if the zymase is not a kind of a undesirability. sent17: there exists nothing that is esoteric and does not acquaint naturalness. sent18: the woodhewer is a thriller and/or is not esoteric if the virologist is not a thriller. sent19: the fact that the citrange is not a thriller hold if the zymase is not a support.
sent15 -> int1: the zymase is not a support or not a vaccinee or both if it does not snooze.; sent11 -> int2: the zymase does not snooze.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the zymase does not support or is not a kind of a vaccinee or both.; int3 & sent19 & sent6 -> int4: the citrange is not a thriller.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the woodhewer is not a thriller or it does not acquaint naturalness or both.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the virologist is burrlike.; sent7 -> int7: if the virologist is burrlike it is esoteric.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the virologist is esoteric.; sent9 -> int9: if the virologist is esoteric it is a dimethylglyoxime.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the virologist is a dimethylglyoxime.; int10 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the jewels-of-opar is not a kind of a undesirability.
sent4 -> int11: if the fact that the woodhewer is esoteric thing that does not acquaint naturalness is not correct it does acquaint naturalness.; sent17 -> int12: the fact that the woodhewer is esoteric and does not acquaint naturalness is false.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the woodhewer does acquaint naturalness.;
$hypothesis$ = the jewels-of-opar is not a undesirability. ; $context$ = sent1: the zymase is not burrlike and/or it does not patrol Ticino. sent2: the fact that the woodhewer does support is correct if the zymase does not acquaint naturalness. sent3: the cinnamon is not a thriller. sent4: something does acquaint naturalness if that it is esoteric and it does not acquaint naturalness is not right. sent5: if the citrange is not a kind of a thriller the woodhewer is not a kind of a thriller and/or it does not acquaint naturalness. sent6: the citrange is not a thriller if the zymase is not a kind of a vaccinee. sent7: if something is burrlike it is esoteric. sent8: the woodhewer is not a kind of a undesirability and/or is not a thriller if it does not acquaint naturalness. sent9: something is a dimethylglyoxime if the fact that it is not esoteric does not hold. sent10: the fact that the citrange is not a kind of a undesirability is not incorrect if it is burrlike and is not a thriller. sent11: the zymase does not snooze and is not a kind of a Carmelite. sent12: the citrange is esoteric. sent13: if the virologist is a dimethylglyoxime the jewels-of-opar is a kind of a undesirability. sent14: if the woodhewer is not a kind of a thriller and/or does not acquaint naturalness the virologist is not non-burrlike. sent15: something that does not snooze does not support or is not a vaccinee or both. sent16: the jewels-of-opar is not Carmelite if the zymase is not a kind of a undesirability. sent17: there exists nothing that is esoteric and does not acquaint naturalness. sent18: the woodhewer is a thriller and/or is not esoteric if the virologist is not a thriller. sent19: the fact that the citrange is not a thriller hold if the zymase is not a support. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the zymase is not a support or not a vaccinee or both if it does not snooze.; sent11 -> int2: the zymase does not snooze.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the zymase does not support or is not a kind of a vaccinee or both.; int3 & sent19 & sent6 -> int4: the citrange is not a thriller.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the woodhewer is not a thriller or it does not acquaint naturalness or both.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the virologist is burrlike.; sent7 -> int7: if the virologist is burrlike it is esoteric.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the virologist is esoteric.; sent9 -> int9: if the virologist is esoteric it is a dimethylglyoxime.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the virologist is a dimethylglyoxime.; int10 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__