the Crucifixion happens.
sent1: that both the non-heroicness and the permissibleness happens yields that the combusting does not occur. sent2: if the heroic does not occur the fact that the stead but not the keratoplasty occurs is not right. sent3: the streaming causes that the stalling does not occur. sent4: if that the warming axolemma happens and the ACE happens is not true then the ACE does not occur. sent5: that the rain occurs triggers that the non-heroicness and the permissibleness occurs. sent6: the scumble does not occur if the stead does not occur. sent7: that the streaming occurs and the realizing Stenopelmatidae happens is brought about by that the ACE does not occur. sent8: the rain occurs if the fact that the rain does not occur but the warming treated happens is incorrect. sent9: if the stead does not occur the fact that the combusting does not occur and/or the scumble happens is incorrect. sent10: if the keratoplasty occurs then the Crucifixion does not occur but the stead occurs. sent11: the keratoplasty does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the combusting does not occur or the scumble happens or both is false then the Crucifixion occurs. sent13: the heroic does not occur. sent14: the drinking cannibalism occurs. sent15: the scumble does not occur. sent16: if the stall does not occur that the raining does not occur but the warming treated happens is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stead happens.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: the stead but not the keratoplasty happens.; sent2 & sent13 -> int2: that the stead occurs and the keratoplasty does not occur is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stead does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the combusting does not occur or the scumble happens or both is false.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the Crucifixion does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Crucifixion happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the non-heroicness and the permissibleness happens yields that the combusting does not occur. sent2: if the heroic does not occur the fact that the stead but not the keratoplasty occurs is not right. sent3: the streaming causes that the stalling does not occur. sent4: if that the warming axolemma happens and the ACE happens is not true then the ACE does not occur. sent5: that the rain occurs triggers that the non-heroicness and the permissibleness occurs. sent6: the scumble does not occur if the stead does not occur. sent7: that the streaming occurs and the realizing Stenopelmatidae happens is brought about by that the ACE does not occur. sent8: the rain occurs if the fact that the rain does not occur but the warming treated happens is incorrect. sent9: if the stead does not occur the fact that the combusting does not occur and/or the scumble happens is incorrect. sent10: if the keratoplasty occurs then the Crucifixion does not occur but the stead occurs. sent11: the keratoplasty does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the combusting does not occur or the scumble happens or both is false then the Crucifixion occurs. sent13: the heroic does not occur. sent14: the drinking cannibalism occurs. sent15: the scumble does not occur. sent16: if the stall does not occur that the raining does not occur but the warming treated happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stead happens.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: the stead but not the keratoplasty happens.; sent2 & sent13 -> int2: that the stead occurs and the keratoplasty does not occur is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stead does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the combusting does not occur or the scumble happens or both is false.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__