if the interrelating immunologist does not occur either the basket happens or the unhappiness occurs or both.
sent1: if the cachecticness happens the eliminating contrasting and/or the jointing occurs. sent2: the evading or the non-non-metricness or both prevents that the majoring does not occur. sent3: if the defibrillating sackbut happens then the basket happens. sent4: the defibrillating flashback happens. sent5: the fact that the protuberating does not occur is right. sent6: that the Resurrection happens leads to that the eliminating flattop happens or that the sunset does not occur or both. sent7: the interrelating immunologist leads to that the eliminating caterpillar occurs or the bicapsularness does not occur or both. sent8: that either the eliminating caterpillar or the non-bicapsularness or both occurs is right if the interrelating immunologist does not occur. sent9: the whipping happens or the objectification happens or both if the jacking does not occur. sent10: the unmaking handrest happens if the fact that the fallout occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the inextricableness occurs if either the defibrillating Debussy happens or the auditoriness does not occur or both. sent12: either the eliminating Anglicism or the non-asyndeticness or both occurs if the unmaking insolubility does not occur. sent13: the eliminating caterpillar and/or the bicapsularness happens if the interrelating immunologist does not occur. sent14: if either the eliminating caterpillar or the non-bicapsularness or both happens the defibrillating sackbut occurs. sent15: that either the basket or the unhappiness or both happens is caused by that the interrelating immunologist occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the interrelating immunologist does not occur is true.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the eliminating caterpillar or the non-bicapsularness or both happens is not wrong.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: that the defibrillating sackbut occurs hold.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the basket occurs.; int3 -> int4: either the basket or the unhappiness or both occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the interrelating immunologist does not occur either the basket happens or the unhappiness occurs or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cachecticness happens the eliminating contrasting and/or the jointing occurs. sent2: the evading or the non-non-metricness or both prevents that the majoring does not occur. sent3: if the defibrillating sackbut happens then the basket happens. sent4: the defibrillating flashback happens. sent5: the fact that the protuberating does not occur is right. sent6: that the Resurrection happens leads to that the eliminating flattop happens or that the sunset does not occur or both. sent7: the interrelating immunologist leads to that the eliminating caterpillar occurs or the bicapsularness does not occur or both. sent8: that either the eliminating caterpillar or the non-bicapsularness or both occurs is right if the interrelating immunologist does not occur. sent9: the whipping happens or the objectification happens or both if the jacking does not occur. sent10: the unmaking handrest happens if the fact that the fallout occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the inextricableness occurs if either the defibrillating Debussy happens or the auditoriness does not occur or both. sent12: either the eliminating Anglicism or the non-asyndeticness or both occurs if the unmaking insolubility does not occur. sent13: the eliminating caterpillar and/or the bicapsularness happens if the interrelating immunologist does not occur. sent14: if either the eliminating caterpillar or the non-bicapsularness or both happens the defibrillating sackbut occurs. sent15: that either the basket or the unhappiness or both happens is caused by that the interrelating immunologist occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the interrelating immunologist does not occur is true.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the eliminating caterpillar or the non-bicapsularness or both happens is not wrong.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: that the defibrillating sackbut occurs hold.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the basket occurs.; int3 -> int4: either the basket or the unhappiness or both occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__