the creature is not a dowry if the gateway is incongruent.
sent1: the gateway is Pauline if the roarer is a kind of a meridian. sent2: the creature is a dowry if there exists something such that it is Pauline and incongruent. sent3: that the fact that the roarer is both not a meridian and not altitudinal is not incorrect is incorrect. sent4: if that the roarer is not a meridian and it is not altitudinal is not right the fact that the gateway is Pauline is right. sent5: if the fact that the diestock is incongruent is not wrong then that it is non-Pauline thing that is not secretarial does not hold.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the gateway is Pauline.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gateway is incongruent.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gateway is Pauline and it is incongruent.; int2 -> int3: something is Pauline thing that is not congruent.;
that the diestock is not Pauline and it is not secretarial does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the creature is not a dowry if the gateway is incongruent. ; $context$ = sent1: the gateway is Pauline if the roarer is a kind of a meridian. sent2: the creature is a dowry if there exists something such that it is Pauline and incongruent. sent3: that the fact that the roarer is both not a meridian and not altitudinal is not incorrect is incorrect. sent4: if that the roarer is not a meridian and it is not altitudinal is not right the fact that the gateway is Pauline is right. sent5: if the fact that the diestock is incongruent is not wrong then that it is non-Pauline thing that is not secretarial does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the gateway is Pauline.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gateway is incongruent.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gateway is Pauline and it is incongruent.; int2 -> int3: something is Pauline thing that is not congruent.; __UNKNOWN__