the fact that if that the glamorizing conception does not occur is not incorrect then the fossorialness does not occur is false.
sent1: the zizz happens. sent2: if not the uncomfortableness but the glamorizing almandine occurs then the glamorizing bog occurs. sent3: the pocket does not occur if the fact that the dilatation does not occur is not false. sent4: the rumba does not occur. sent5: that both the non-run-onness and the backhanding happens results in that the dominating gadgetry occurs. sent6: the auroralness occurs. sent7: the blast does not occur. sent8: not the snipe but the Modernness occurs. sent9: that both the Galwegianness and the palling happens is triggered by that the rumba does not occur. sent10: the dominating Winesap does not occur. sent11: the glamorizing conception occurs if that both the non-run-onness and the backhand occurs is not right. sent12: that the beagling occurs and the noncollapsibleness happens is caused by that the peeping does not occur. sent13: the untraceableness does not occur. sent14: the peeping happens if the unholiness does not occur. sent15: the penumbralness does not occur but the dominating wheatfield happens. sent16: that the cannibalisticness occurs is caused by that the lottery does not occur. sent17: the fossorialness occurs if the glamorizing conception does not occur. sent18: the cackle does not occur. sent19: the call-out occurs. sent20: that the sketching does not occur is prevented by that both the non-palpatoryness and the pocket occurs. sent21: if that both the non-cannibalisticness and the manualness happens is not wrong then the cabotage does not occur. sent22: if the dominating gadgetry happens then the consciousness does not occur. sent23: not the vesiculating but the carpetbag occurs. sent24: if both the non-consciousness and the Galwegianness occurs then the fossorialness does not occur. sent25: the fact that the encouragement happens is not wrong. sent26: the sloth happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that both the non-run-onness and the backhandness happens is not correct.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the glamorizing conception occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glamorizing conception does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the non-run-onness and the backhanding occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the dominating gadgetry happens.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the consciousness does not occur.; sent9 & sent4 -> int6: the Galwegianness and the palling occurs.; int6 -> int7: the Galwegianness happens.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the consciousness does not occur but the Galwegianness occurs.; int8 & sent24 -> int9: the fossorialness does not occur.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the glamorizing conception does not occur is not incorrect then the fossorialness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the zizz happens. sent2: if not the uncomfortableness but the glamorizing almandine occurs then the glamorizing bog occurs. sent3: the pocket does not occur if the fact that the dilatation does not occur is not false. sent4: the rumba does not occur. sent5: that both the non-run-onness and the backhanding happens results in that the dominating gadgetry occurs. sent6: the auroralness occurs. sent7: the blast does not occur. sent8: not the snipe but the Modernness occurs. sent9: that both the Galwegianness and the palling happens is triggered by that the rumba does not occur. sent10: the dominating Winesap does not occur. sent11: the glamorizing conception occurs if that both the non-run-onness and the backhand occurs is not right. sent12: that the beagling occurs and the noncollapsibleness happens is caused by that the peeping does not occur. sent13: the untraceableness does not occur. sent14: the peeping happens if the unholiness does not occur. sent15: the penumbralness does not occur but the dominating wheatfield happens. sent16: that the cannibalisticness occurs is caused by that the lottery does not occur. sent17: the fossorialness occurs if the glamorizing conception does not occur. sent18: the cackle does not occur. sent19: the call-out occurs. sent20: that the sketching does not occur is prevented by that both the non-palpatoryness and the pocket occurs. sent21: if that both the non-cannibalisticness and the manualness happens is not wrong then the cabotage does not occur. sent22: if the dominating gadgetry happens then the consciousness does not occur. sent23: not the vesiculating but the carpetbag occurs. sent24: if both the non-consciousness and the Galwegianness occurs then the fossorialness does not occur. sent25: the fact that the encouragement happens is not wrong. sent26: the sloth happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that both the non-run-onness and the backhandness happens is not correct.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the glamorizing conception occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glamorizing conception does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the non-run-onness and the backhanding occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the dominating gadgetry happens.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the consciousness does not occur.; sent9 & sent4 -> int6: the Galwegianness and the palling occurs.; int6 -> int7: the Galwegianness happens.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the consciousness does not occur but the Galwegianness occurs.; int8 & sent24 -> int9: the fossorialness does not occur.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__