the tichodrome does not criticize syndactyly.
sent1: the tichodrome criticizes syndactyly if the larvacide is serious but it does not criticizes syndactyly. sent2: that something is not a separationism but it is a kind of a malnutrition does not hold if it is not a kind of a Guarnerius. sent3: if there is something such that it is indefeasible then the tichodrome is not a kind of a Guarnerius. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is indefeasible hold. sent5: the larvacide is a malnutrition. sent6: if the larvacide is serious and it is a malnutrition then the tichodrome does not criticize syndactyly. sent7: the larvacide is not a Libyan but it is a kind of a malnutrition if it is not a separationism. sent8: that the Jacobs criticizes Limacidae and is not a malnutrition is false. sent9: the larvacide is serious if there exists something such that that it is not postwar and it is not a Quoratean is not correct. sent10: the fact that that something is not postwar and is not a Quoratean is incorrect if it is a kind of a Libyan is true. sent11: the fact that something is not postwar but it is a Quoratean is incorrect if it is a kind of a Libyan. sent12: the worker is a kind of a Libyan.
sent10 -> int1: that the worker is not postwar and not a Quoratean is not correct if it is a Libyan.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the worker is not postwar and is not a kind of a Quoratean is not true.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not postwar and it is not a Quoratean does not hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the larvacide is serious.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the larvacide is a kind of serious a malnutrition.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the tichodrome criticizes syndactyly.
$hypothesis$ = the tichodrome does not criticize syndactyly. ; $context$ = sent1: the tichodrome criticizes syndactyly if the larvacide is serious but it does not criticizes syndactyly. sent2: that something is not a separationism but it is a kind of a malnutrition does not hold if it is not a kind of a Guarnerius. sent3: if there is something such that it is indefeasible then the tichodrome is not a kind of a Guarnerius. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is indefeasible hold. sent5: the larvacide is a malnutrition. sent6: if the larvacide is serious and it is a malnutrition then the tichodrome does not criticize syndactyly. sent7: the larvacide is not a Libyan but it is a kind of a malnutrition if it is not a separationism. sent8: that the Jacobs criticizes Limacidae and is not a malnutrition is false. sent9: the larvacide is serious if there exists something such that that it is not postwar and it is not a Quoratean is not correct. sent10: the fact that that something is not postwar and is not a Quoratean is incorrect if it is a kind of a Libyan is true. sent11: the fact that something is not postwar but it is a Quoratean is incorrect if it is a kind of a Libyan. sent12: the worker is a kind of a Libyan. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: that the worker is not postwar and not a Quoratean is not correct if it is a Libyan.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the worker is not postwar and is not a kind of a Quoratean is not true.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not postwar and it is not a Quoratean does not hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the larvacide is serious.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the larvacide is a kind of serious a malnutrition.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__