the desperado is a kind of a commensal.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a kind of a grapefruit. sent2: the walloper is a kind of a carboxyl if something overturns amaretto and does not play glutamine. sent3: if the desperado does not telescope and/or is not appellative it is not a hand-me-down. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a grapefruit the piroplasm overturns amaretto and does not play glutamine. sent5: there is something such that it is not a grapefruit. sent6: the desperado is not a commensal if that it is a hypocellularity or not a calumet or both is false. sent7: the desperado is not appellative if the walloper is a carboxyl. sent8: if that the desperado is not a kind of a hand-me-down is correct the fact that either it is a kind of a hypocellularity or it is not a kind of a calumet or both is incorrect.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the piroplasm overturns amaretto but it does not play glutamine.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does overturn amaretto and does not play glutamine.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the walloper is a carboxyl.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the desperado is not appellative.; int4 -> int5: the desperado either is not a kind of a telescope or is not appellative or both.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the desperado is not a hand-me-down.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the desperado is a kind of a hypocellularity or it is not a kind of a calumet or both is incorrect.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the desperado is a kind of a commensal. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a kind of a grapefruit. sent2: the walloper is a kind of a carboxyl if something overturns amaretto and does not play glutamine. sent3: if the desperado does not telescope and/or is not appellative it is not a hand-me-down. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a grapefruit the piroplasm overturns amaretto and does not play glutamine. sent5: there is something such that it is not a grapefruit. sent6: the desperado is not a commensal if that it is a hypocellularity or not a calumet or both is false. sent7: the desperado is not appellative if the walloper is a carboxyl. sent8: if that the desperado is not a kind of a hand-me-down is correct the fact that either it is a kind of a hypocellularity or it is not a kind of a calumet or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the piroplasm overturns amaretto but it does not play glutamine.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does overturn amaretto and does not play glutamine.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the walloper is a carboxyl.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the desperado is not appellative.; int4 -> int5: the desperado either is not a kind of a telescope or is not appellative or both.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the desperado is not a hand-me-down.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the desperado is a kind of a hypocellularity or it is not a kind of a calumet or both is incorrect.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__