that the game does not occur if the corkscrewing valsartan occurs is not true.
sent1: the reading undesirable happens and the theatrical happens. sent2: the meatlessness does not occur if that the upping but not the pressure occurs does not hold. sent3: the fact that if the reading guarantee happens the reading yak but not the classicalness happens is not wrong. sent4: that the reading yak occurs but the classical does not occur prevents that the brachialness happens. sent5: the theatricalness does not occur if both the corkscrewing valsartan and the game happens. sent6: if that the game occurs and the valvularness does not occur is false then that the valvularness happens is not wrong. sent7: the handmadeness happens. sent8: if the brachialness does not occur the banding happens and the partitive does not occur. sent9: the fact that the theatricalness and the reading undesirable occurs is incorrect if the partitive does not occur. sent10: that the game occurs and the valvularness does not occur is false if the corkscrewing valsartan does not occur. sent11: the meatyness causes that both the reading guarantee and the proactiveness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corkscrewing valsartan happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the game happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the corkscrewing valsartan and the game happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the theatricalness does not occur.; sent1 -> int3: the theatricalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the game does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the valvularness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the game does not occur if the corkscrewing valsartan occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the reading undesirable happens and the theatrical happens. sent2: the meatlessness does not occur if that the upping but not the pressure occurs does not hold. sent3: the fact that if the reading guarantee happens the reading yak but not the classicalness happens is not wrong. sent4: that the reading yak occurs but the classical does not occur prevents that the brachialness happens. sent5: the theatricalness does not occur if both the corkscrewing valsartan and the game happens. sent6: if that the game occurs and the valvularness does not occur is false then that the valvularness happens is not wrong. sent7: the handmadeness happens. sent8: if the brachialness does not occur the banding happens and the partitive does not occur. sent9: the fact that the theatricalness and the reading undesirable occurs is incorrect if the partitive does not occur. sent10: that the game occurs and the valvularness does not occur is false if the corkscrewing valsartan does not occur. sent11: the meatyness causes that both the reading guarantee and the proactiveness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corkscrewing valsartan happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the game happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the corkscrewing valsartan and the game happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the theatricalness does not occur.; sent1 -> int3: the theatricalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the game does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__