the joist does not collogue and is not a Pachycephala.
sent1: that something is a kind of a Selkup that is not autotrophic is not correct if it is not a kind of a vociferator. sent2: something that does not collogue is a Selkup that is a kind of a sun. sent3: the fact that something does not sample zoanthropy and it is not a waffler is wrong if it is a vociferator. sent4: the joist is not a vociferator but it is autotrophic if the fact that it is not a kind of a dysentery is not false. sent5: that the zero damps if the stomacher is a kind of an adulation is true. sent6: that the PR is a superior but it is not a kind of a Lindbergh is not true. sent7: if something that is not a vociferator is autotrophic then it is not a Pachycephala. sent8: the fact that the zero is a Pachycephala and not a dysentery is not correct if it damps. sent9: there is nothing that is not a superior and is not a Lindbergh. sent10: the joist is not a Lindbergh. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Uruguayan and samples responsiveness the stomacher is an adulation. sent12: the stomacher does not sample zoanthropy. sent13: if the fact that something is a Pachycephala that is not a dysentery is incorrect it does not collogue. sent14: if the stomacher is a kind of a Selkup then the joist is a Selkup. sent15: the fact that the joist does not collogue and it is not a Pachycephala is not true if there exists something such that it samples zoanthropy. sent16: the stomacher suns if the fact that the PR is autotrophic hold. sent17: the candlestick is not a Uruguayan but it samples responsiveness. sent18: a Selkup does not collogue. sent19: the candlestick does sample zoanthropy if the stomacher suns. sent20: if the fact that the PR is not a vociferator is not false the fact that it is a Selkup and it is autotrophic does not hold. sent21: if there exists something such that it samples zoanthropy then the fact that the joist collogues and is not a Pachycephala is not correct. sent22: if something is not a vociferator then that it is both a Selkup and autotrophic is not true. sent23: the PR is not a kind of a vociferator if that it is not a superior and not a Lindbergh is not true. sent24: the PR is not a kind of a vociferator if it is a superior. sent25: the stomacher is a kind of a sun if that the PR is a Selkup but it is not autotrophic is wrong.
sent9 -> int1: that the PR is not a kind of a superior and it is not a kind of a Lindbergh is incorrect.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the PR is not a vociferator.; sent1 -> int3: that the fact that the PR is a Selkup that is not autotrophic is incorrect is not false if it is not a vociferator.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the PR is a Selkup and not autotrophic does not hold.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the stomacher is a sun.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the candlestick samples zoanthropy.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it samples zoanthropy.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
that the zero does not sample zoanthropy and is not a waffler is wrong.
sent3 -> int8: if the zero is a kind of a vociferator the fact that it does not sample zoanthropy and it is not a waffler is not true.; sent2 -> int9: if the fact that the zero does not collogue is not wrong then it is a Selkup and it does sun.; sent13 -> int10: if the fact that the zero is a kind of a Pachycephala but it is not a kind of a dysentery does not hold then it does not collogue.; sent17 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Uruguayan and samples responsiveness.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the stomacher is an adulation.; sent5 & int12 -> int13: the zero damps.; sent8 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the zero is a Pachycephala but it is not a dysentery is not right.; int10 & int14 -> int15: that the zero does not collogue is not false.; int9 & int15 -> int16: the zero is a Selkup that is a sun.; int16 -> int17: the zero is a kind of a Selkup.;
$hypothesis$ = the joist does not collogue and is not a Pachycephala. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a kind of a Selkup that is not autotrophic is not correct if it is not a kind of a vociferator. sent2: something that does not collogue is a Selkup that is a kind of a sun. sent3: the fact that something does not sample zoanthropy and it is not a waffler is wrong if it is a vociferator. sent4: the joist is not a vociferator but it is autotrophic if the fact that it is not a kind of a dysentery is not false. sent5: that the zero damps if the stomacher is a kind of an adulation is true. sent6: that the PR is a superior but it is not a kind of a Lindbergh is not true. sent7: if something that is not a vociferator is autotrophic then it is not a Pachycephala. sent8: the fact that the zero is a Pachycephala and not a dysentery is not correct if it damps. sent9: there is nothing that is not a superior and is not a Lindbergh. sent10: the joist is not a Lindbergh. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Uruguayan and samples responsiveness the stomacher is an adulation. sent12: the stomacher does not sample zoanthropy. sent13: if the fact that something is a Pachycephala that is not a dysentery is incorrect it does not collogue. sent14: if the stomacher is a kind of a Selkup then the joist is a Selkup. sent15: the fact that the joist does not collogue and it is not a Pachycephala is not true if there exists something such that it samples zoanthropy. sent16: the stomacher suns if the fact that the PR is autotrophic hold. sent17: the candlestick is not a Uruguayan but it samples responsiveness. sent18: a Selkup does not collogue. sent19: the candlestick does sample zoanthropy if the stomacher suns. sent20: if the fact that the PR is not a vociferator is not false the fact that it is a Selkup and it is autotrophic does not hold. sent21: if there exists something such that it samples zoanthropy then the fact that the joist collogues and is not a Pachycephala is not correct. sent22: if something is not a vociferator then that it is both a Selkup and autotrophic is not true. sent23: the PR is not a kind of a vociferator if that it is not a superior and not a Lindbergh is not true. sent24: the PR is not a kind of a vociferator if it is a superior. sent25: the stomacher is a kind of a sun if that the PR is a Selkup but it is not autotrophic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the PR is not a kind of a superior and it is not a kind of a Lindbergh is incorrect.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the PR is not a vociferator.; sent1 -> int3: that the fact that the PR is a Selkup that is not autotrophic is incorrect is not false if it is not a vociferator.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the PR is a Selkup and not autotrophic does not hold.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the stomacher is a sun.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the candlestick samples zoanthropy.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it samples zoanthropy.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__