the witloof is unquiet.
sent1: the fact that the huckleberry is pugilistic if the huckleberry details toastrack is true. sent2: there is something such that it clangors Cabell. sent3: if the witloof is not a kind of an alluvium that the huckleberry is dulled but it does not detail Bonasa is not right. sent4: that the huckleberry is not dulled and does not detail Bonasa is not right if the fact that the witloof is not an alluvium is not wrong. sent5: the huckleberry details toastrack. sent6: if the witloof is not unquiet then it is not a kind of an alluvium. sent7: if there is something such that it clangors Cabell and it does not detail lemon the generic does not detail candlelight. sent8: that if there exists something such that that it is not dulled and it does not detail Bonasa is incorrect then the stout is pugilistic is not incorrect. sent9: if there is something such that it is pugilistic and details Bonasa the witloof does not dull. sent10: the generic does detail candlelight if the anaglyph is a blastema. sent11: the tender does clangor Cabell and does not detail lemon. sent12: the fact that the witloof is not unquiet hold if the huckleberry is unquiet and it is an alluvium. sent13: the huckleberry details Bonasa if the fact that either it is not a kind of a blastema or it does not detail candlelight or both is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the witloof is not unquiet.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the witloof is not an alluvium.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the huckleberry is a kind of non-dulled thing that does not detail Bonasa is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is not dulled and it does not detail Bonasa is incorrect.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the stout is pugilistic.; sent11 -> int5: there is something such that it does clangor Cabell and does not detail lemon.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the generic does not detail candlelight.;
the witloof is not unquiet.
$hypothesis$ = the witloof is unquiet. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the huckleberry is pugilistic if the huckleberry details toastrack is true. sent2: there is something such that it clangors Cabell. sent3: if the witloof is not a kind of an alluvium that the huckleberry is dulled but it does not detail Bonasa is not right. sent4: that the huckleberry is not dulled and does not detail Bonasa is not right if the fact that the witloof is not an alluvium is not wrong. sent5: the huckleberry details toastrack. sent6: if the witloof is not unquiet then it is not a kind of an alluvium. sent7: if there is something such that it clangors Cabell and it does not detail lemon the generic does not detail candlelight. sent8: that if there exists something such that that it is not dulled and it does not detail Bonasa is incorrect then the stout is pugilistic is not incorrect. sent9: if there is something such that it is pugilistic and details Bonasa the witloof does not dull. sent10: the generic does detail candlelight if the anaglyph is a blastema. sent11: the tender does clangor Cabell and does not detail lemon. sent12: the fact that the witloof is not unquiet hold if the huckleberry is unquiet and it is an alluvium. sent13: the huckleberry details Bonasa if the fact that either it is not a kind of a blastema or it does not detail candlelight or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the witloof is not unquiet.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the witloof is not an alluvium.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the huckleberry is a kind of non-dulled thing that does not detail Bonasa is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is not dulled and it does not detail Bonasa is incorrect.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the stout is pugilistic.; sent11 -> int5: there is something such that it does clangor Cabell and does not detail lemon.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the generic does not detail candlelight.; __UNKNOWN__