the fact that there exists something such that if it is not impermeable then that it is both a bluestem and not a Call is wrong does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is permeable it is a bluestem and it is not a Call. sent2: the fact that the coat remounts but it is not a kind of a Call is wrong if it is a kind of a neonate. sent3: that the fiduciary is a flexion and is not permeable is false if it repines storyteller. sent4: if the cobber is permeable then that it is a kind of a bluestem and it is a Call is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it is biotypic then that it is a kind of a tornado and it is not a modern is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it is electronic then that it is a kind of a ramekin that is not a kind of a root is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is gynecological that it is an allied and enforceable is not right. sent8: if the cobber is permeable it is a bluestem and is not a Call. sent9: the fact that the fact that the cobber is a bluestem but it is not an advanced is false is true if it is gonadal. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a stretch that it is dispensable and it is not a kind of a neurolinguist is not correct. sent11: the fact that the Choctaw does repine cobber and is not a bluestem is not correct if it is an eight. sent12: there is something such that if it tests then the fact that it is Bulgarian thing that is not disintegrative is wrong. sent13: if the cobber is an excellence that it is a rationalization and is not a Call is false. sent14: that there exists something such that if it is permeable that it is a bluestem and it is a Call is false hold. sent15: if something is a hatch then the fact that it does carouse and it is not a Call is not true. sent16: the fact that the cobber is a bluestem and not a Call is not true if it is permeable. sent17: if the cataract is a radiochlorine then the fact that it is a Call and it does not enfranchise concussion is not right. sent18: there is something such that if it is a granter then that it is a kind of Thai thing that is not a serape is not correct.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
if the Kotex does hatch the fact that the fact that it is both a carouse and not a Call is true is incorrect.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not impermeable then that it is both a bluestem and not a Call is wrong does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is permeable it is a bluestem and it is not a Call. sent2: the fact that the coat remounts but it is not a kind of a Call is wrong if it is a kind of a neonate. sent3: that the fiduciary is a flexion and is not permeable is false if it repines storyteller. sent4: if the cobber is permeable then that it is a kind of a bluestem and it is a Call is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it is biotypic then that it is a kind of a tornado and it is not a modern is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it is electronic then that it is a kind of a ramekin that is not a kind of a root is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is gynecological that it is an allied and enforceable is not right. sent8: if the cobber is permeable it is a bluestem and is not a Call. sent9: the fact that the fact that the cobber is a bluestem but it is not an advanced is false is true if it is gonadal. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a stretch that it is dispensable and it is not a kind of a neurolinguist is not correct. sent11: the fact that the Choctaw does repine cobber and is not a bluestem is not correct if it is an eight. sent12: there is something such that if it tests then the fact that it is Bulgarian thing that is not disintegrative is wrong. sent13: if the cobber is an excellence that it is a rationalization and is not a Call is false. sent14: that there exists something such that if it is permeable that it is a bluestem and it is a Call is false hold. sent15: if something is a hatch then the fact that it does carouse and it is not a Call is not true. sent16: the fact that the cobber is a bluestem and not a Call is not true if it is permeable. sent17: if the cataract is a radiochlorine then the fact that it is a Call and it does not enfranchise concussion is not right. sent18: there is something such that if it is a granter then that it is a kind of Thai thing that is not a serape is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__