the fact that the heraldicness occurs hold.
sent1: the heraldicness does not occur and the myelography does not occur if the scenicness happens. sent2: that that the pleaching does not occur but the naming happens is right is wrong if the abstraction does not occur. sent3: if the pleaching happens then the best does not occur. sent4: that the creativeness happens is true. sent5: if the myelography does not occur the blinking occurs. sent6: the scenicness does not occur but the testing happens if the bestness does not occur. sent7: both the favorableness and the check occurs if the detailing hairpiece does not occur. sent8: if the detailing hairpiece does not occur then the fact that not the checking but the favorableness occurs is false. sent9: the capsuling upper and the detailing quaff occurs if the refining does not occur. sent10: the patinating Guyanese occurs. sent11: the best does not occur if the fact that not the pleaching but the names happens is false. sent12: the blinks and the heraldicness occurs if the myelography does not occur. sent13: the future does not occur. sent14: if the capsuling upper and the detailing quaff occurs then the detailing hairpiece does not occur. sent15: the blinks occurs. sent16: the capsuling upper leads to that the detailing hairpiece does not occur and the detailing quaff does not occur. sent17: the myelography does not occur. sent18: the abstraction does not occur if the fact that the fact that not the check but the favorableness occurs is not right is correct. sent19: if the best does not occur then the scenicness and the testing happens. sent20: not the naming but the abstraction happens if the check happens. sent21: that the naming does not occur brings about that the pleaching occurs. sent22: the fossilization occurs.
sent12 & sent17 -> int1: the blinking occurs and the heraldicness happens.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the clangoring bibbed does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the heraldicness occurs hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the heraldicness does not occur and the myelography does not occur if the scenicness happens. sent2: that that the pleaching does not occur but the naming happens is right is wrong if the abstraction does not occur. sent3: if the pleaching happens then the best does not occur. sent4: that the creativeness happens is true. sent5: if the myelography does not occur the blinking occurs. sent6: the scenicness does not occur but the testing happens if the bestness does not occur. sent7: both the favorableness and the check occurs if the detailing hairpiece does not occur. sent8: if the detailing hairpiece does not occur then the fact that not the checking but the favorableness occurs is false. sent9: the capsuling upper and the detailing quaff occurs if the refining does not occur. sent10: the patinating Guyanese occurs. sent11: the best does not occur if the fact that not the pleaching but the names happens is false. sent12: the blinks and the heraldicness occurs if the myelography does not occur. sent13: the future does not occur. sent14: if the capsuling upper and the detailing quaff occurs then the detailing hairpiece does not occur. sent15: the blinks occurs. sent16: the capsuling upper leads to that the detailing hairpiece does not occur and the detailing quaff does not occur. sent17: the myelography does not occur. sent18: the abstraction does not occur if the fact that the fact that not the check but the favorableness occurs is not right is correct. sent19: if the best does not occur then the scenicness and the testing happens. sent20: not the naming but the abstraction happens if the check happens. sent21: that the naming does not occur brings about that the pleaching occurs. sent22: the fossilization occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent17 -> int1: the blinking occurs and the heraldicness happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__