the cant is technological.
sent1: the sou'wester is not a paleozoology if the littoral is an invention. sent2: the crankshaft is not a craps if it is both non-Romance and not reasonable. sent3: if the spiracle is not a kind of a secondary and it is not a flavor the crankshaft is not a kind of a Romance. sent4: the littoral is a craps. sent5: if the fact that something is a kind of unreasonable an orderly is not right it is not an orderly. sent6: the burgess is a kind of a correspondent if there exists something such that that that it does not thrust figment and it is not anapestic hold is false. sent7: if that the littoral does not thrust littoral is not false then that the sou'wester is not a paleozoology is true. sent8: the crankshaft is unreasonable if that the burgess is a correspondent is true. sent9: if the crankshaft is not a craps the littoral is an invention or does not thrust littoral or both. sent10: something is technological if that it is not a sparker and it does not heal backbeat is incorrect. sent11: the spiracle is not secondary and is not a flavor. sent12: the fact that the cant is not a sparker and it does not heal backbeat is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a paleozoology.
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the crankshaft is not a Romance.; sent10 -> int2: the cant is technological if that it is not a kind of a sparker and it does not heal backbeat is not true.;
the repairman is side-to-side and/or not an orderly.
sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the burgess is unreasonable and it is orderly is not true then the fact that it is not an orderly hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the cant is technological. ; $context$ = sent1: the sou'wester is not a paleozoology if the littoral is an invention. sent2: the crankshaft is not a craps if it is both non-Romance and not reasonable. sent3: if the spiracle is not a kind of a secondary and it is not a flavor the crankshaft is not a kind of a Romance. sent4: the littoral is a craps. sent5: if the fact that something is a kind of unreasonable an orderly is not right it is not an orderly. sent6: the burgess is a kind of a correspondent if there exists something such that that that it does not thrust figment and it is not anapestic hold is false. sent7: if that the littoral does not thrust littoral is not false then that the sou'wester is not a paleozoology is true. sent8: the crankshaft is unreasonable if that the burgess is a correspondent is true. sent9: if the crankshaft is not a craps the littoral is an invention or does not thrust littoral or both. sent10: something is technological if that it is not a sparker and it does not heal backbeat is incorrect. sent11: the spiracle is not secondary and is not a flavor. sent12: the fact that the cant is not a sparker and it does not heal backbeat is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a paleozoology. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the crankshaft is not a Romance.; sent10 -> int2: the cant is technological if that it is not a kind of a sparker and it does not heal backbeat is not true.; __UNKNOWN__