something is absolute and it is not indefinite.
sent1: the Tudor is not a tackle. sent2: if the fact that the Tudor does not misgive is not wrong the tepee is definite. sent3: that that the Tudor is indefinite but it does misgive is not wrong is false if it is not a kind of a tackle. sent4: if that something is not a kind of a pinball but it is Semitic is false then it is an impunity. sent5: the Tudor is a mutant and it is a cranesbill if there are palatable things. sent6: if the Tudor is a mutant and a cranesbill it is not unimpressive. sent7: that the sluicegate does letter medusa but it does not still autograph is wrong. sent8: the tepee is definite if that that the Tudor is not definite but it does misgive hold does not hold. sent9: something is definite. sent10: something does tackle if the fact that it is not a Arundo and/or it is a wangle does not hold. sent11: something is absolute. sent12: the sluicegate does reset tepee if that it does not letter medusa and does not still autograph is wrong. sent13: if something does misgive it does not reset tepee and it is not absolute. sent14: something is palatable. sent15: something that tackles misgives. sent16: there exists nothing such that it does not letter medusa and does not still autograph. sent17: if the sluicegate resets tepee the tepee is not non-absolute. sent18: the fact that the sluicegate is definite is correct if the fact that the Tudor is not definite but it does still autograph is not right. sent19: that the sluicegate does not letter medusa but it does still autograph is not true. sent20: if the tepee is an impunity then the sluicegate resets contracted. sent21: something does letter suffocation if the fact that it resets contracted is correct. sent22: that something is not a Arundo or it is a wangle or both is not true if the fact that it letters suffocation is right. sent23: if something does not reset tepee then that it is not ametropic and is definite does not hold. sent24: there is nothing such that it does letter medusa and does not still autograph. sent25: the Tudor does still autograph. sent26: there exists nothing such that it does not letter medusa and stills autograph.
sent16 -> int1: that the sluicegate does not letter medusa and it does not still autograph is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the sluicegate does reset tepee.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the tepee is an absolute.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the Tudor is a kind of non-definite thing that misgives does not hold.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the tepee is definite.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the tepee is an absolute and is definite.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sluicegate is not ametropic but it is definite is not correct.
sent23 -> int7: if the sluicegate does not reset tepee then the fact that it is not ametropic and it is definite is false.; sent13 -> int8: the sluicegate does not reset tepee and it is not absolute if it misgives.; sent15 -> int9: if the fact that the sluicegate is a tackle hold then the fact that it does misgive is true.; sent10 -> int10: the sluicegate is a tackle if that it is not a kind of a Arundo or it is a wangle or both is not correct.; sent22 -> int11: the fact that the sluicegate either is not a Arundo or is a wangle or both is not right if it does letter suffocation.; sent21 -> int12: the sluicegate does letter suffocation if it does reset contracted.; sent4 -> int13: the tepee is an impunity if the fact that it is not a pinball but Semitic does not hold.; sent14 & sent5 -> int14: the Tudor is mutant and it is a kind of a cranesbill.; sent6 & int14 -> int15: the Tudor is not unimpressive.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is not unimpressive.;
$hypothesis$ = something is absolute and it is not indefinite. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tudor is not a tackle. sent2: if the fact that the Tudor does not misgive is not wrong the tepee is definite. sent3: that that the Tudor is indefinite but it does misgive is not wrong is false if it is not a kind of a tackle. sent4: if that something is not a kind of a pinball but it is Semitic is false then it is an impunity. sent5: the Tudor is a mutant and it is a cranesbill if there are palatable things. sent6: if the Tudor is a mutant and a cranesbill it is not unimpressive. sent7: that the sluicegate does letter medusa but it does not still autograph is wrong. sent8: the tepee is definite if that that the Tudor is not definite but it does misgive hold does not hold. sent9: something is definite. sent10: something does tackle if the fact that it is not a Arundo and/or it is a wangle does not hold. sent11: something is absolute. sent12: the sluicegate does reset tepee if that it does not letter medusa and does not still autograph is wrong. sent13: if something does misgive it does not reset tepee and it is not absolute. sent14: something is palatable. sent15: something that tackles misgives. sent16: there exists nothing such that it does not letter medusa and does not still autograph. sent17: if the sluicegate resets tepee the tepee is not non-absolute. sent18: the fact that the sluicegate is definite is correct if the fact that the Tudor is not definite but it does still autograph is not right. sent19: that the sluicegate does not letter medusa but it does still autograph is not true. sent20: if the tepee is an impunity then the sluicegate resets contracted. sent21: something does letter suffocation if the fact that it resets contracted is correct. sent22: that something is not a Arundo or it is a wangle or both is not true if the fact that it letters suffocation is right. sent23: if something does not reset tepee then that it is not ametropic and is definite does not hold. sent24: there is nothing such that it does letter medusa and does not still autograph. sent25: the Tudor does still autograph. sent26: there exists nothing such that it does not letter medusa and stills autograph. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: that the sluicegate does not letter medusa and it does not still autograph is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the sluicegate does reset tepee.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the tepee is an absolute.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the Tudor is a kind of non-definite thing that misgives does not hold.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the tepee is definite.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the tepee is an absolute and is definite.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__