there is something such that if the fact that it does accumulate and is not acrogenic does not hold then it does not instrument tyiyn.
sent1: if the fact that the venison is paroxysmal thing that does not mystify insurance is not right then it does not accumulate. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does accumulate and is not acrogenic is incorrect then it instruments tyiyn. sent3: there exists something such that if it does accumulate and is not acrogenic it does not instrument tyiyn. sent4: if the venison does accumulate but it is not acrogenic then it does not instrument tyiyn. sent5: if the fact that that something is a Eruca but it is not a kind of a Tyrolean is right is incorrect it is not disloyal. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not accumulate is not false then it does not instrument tyiyn. sent7: the venison does not instrument tyiyn if it does not accumulate. sent8: if that the venison accumulates and it is acrogenic does not hold it does not instrument tyiyn. sent9: if the venison does integrate Ophiophagus and does not instrument tyiyn then it is not a florilegium. sent10: the fact that if that the venison accumulates but it is not acrogenic is incorrect then the venison does instrument tyiyn hold. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it bounds and it does not reunify does not hold it is not disloyal. sent12: if the fact that something does integrate Ophiophagus but it is not a LH is wrong it does not disarm. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it does accumulate and is acrogenic is not true it does not instrument tyiyn. sent14: the broiler does not mystify Halifax if that it is both a consultancy and not astrophysical is false. sent15: the venison does not instrument tyiyn if the fact that it does accumulate and it is not acrogenic is not true. sent16: there is something such that if it is acrogenic then it does not instrument tyiyn.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
the tasting does not disarm if the fact that it does integrate Ophiophagus and it is not a LH is wrong.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it does accumulate and is not acrogenic does not hold then it does not instrument tyiyn. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the venison is paroxysmal thing that does not mystify insurance is not right then it does not accumulate. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does accumulate and is not acrogenic is incorrect then it instruments tyiyn. sent3: there exists something such that if it does accumulate and is not acrogenic it does not instrument tyiyn. sent4: if the venison does accumulate but it is not acrogenic then it does not instrument tyiyn. sent5: if the fact that that something is a Eruca but it is not a kind of a Tyrolean is right is incorrect it is not disloyal. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not accumulate is not false then it does not instrument tyiyn. sent7: the venison does not instrument tyiyn if it does not accumulate. sent8: if that the venison accumulates and it is acrogenic does not hold it does not instrument tyiyn. sent9: if the venison does integrate Ophiophagus and does not instrument tyiyn then it is not a florilegium. sent10: the fact that if that the venison accumulates but it is not acrogenic is incorrect then the venison does instrument tyiyn hold. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it bounds and it does not reunify does not hold it is not disloyal. sent12: if the fact that something does integrate Ophiophagus but it is not a LH is wrong it does not disarm. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it does accumulate and is acrogenic is not true it does not instrument tyiyn. sent14: the broiler does not mystify Halifax if that it is both a consultancy and not astrophysical is false. sent15: the venison does not instrument tyiyn if the fact that it does accumulate and it is not acrogenic is not true. sent16: there is something such that if it is acrogenic then it does not instrument tyiyn. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__