there is something such that it is fractional and it is not a schizogony.
sent1: the drawer is not a schizogony. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a schizogony. sent3: if the promontory does tusk Kongo and does apprentice then that it is not a schizogony is not false. sent4: there exists something such that it is fractional. sent5: the drawer is not a schizogony if the promontory is not a schizogony. sent6: the promontory does tusk Kongo if it is a kind of an assurance that publicizes. sent7: if there is something such that that it does illuminate or it is managerial or both is wrong the promontory is an apprenticed. sent8: if the promontory is not a schizogony the drawer is fractional but it is not a schizogony. sent9: there is something such that that it illuminates and/or it is managerial is not right. sent10: something that is an assurance and does not publicize tusks Kongo. sent11: there exists something such that it is fractional and it is a schizogony. sent12: either something does illuminate or it is managerial or both. sent13: the promontory is an assurance that does not publicize. sent14: there is something such that it is reproducible. sent15: if something that is an assurance does publicize it tusks Kongo.
sent10 -> int1: the promontory tusks Kongo if it is an assurance that does not publicize.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the promontory tusks Kongo.; sent9 & sent7 -> int3: the promontory is an apprenticed.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the promontory does tusk Kongo and it does apprentice.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the promontory is not a schizogony.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the drawer is fractional thing that is not a kind of a schizogony.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is fractional and it is not a schizogony. ; $context$ = sent1: the drawer is not a schizogony. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a schizogony. sent3: if the promontory does tusk Kongo and does apprentice then that it is not a schizogony is not false. sent4: there exists something such that it is fractional. sent5: the drawer is not a schizogony if the promontory is not a schizogony. sent6: the promontory does tusk Kongo if it is a kind of an assurance that publicizes. sent7: if there is something such that that it does illuminate or it is managerial or both is wrong the promontory is an apprenticed. sent8: if the promontory is not a schizogony the drawer is fractional but it is not a schizogony. sent9: there is something such that that it illuminates and/or it is managerial is not right. sent10: something that is an assurance and does not publicize tusks Kongo. sent11: there exists something such that it is fractional and it is a schizogony. sent12: either something does illuminate or it is managerial or both. sent13: the promontory is an assurance that does not publicize. sent14: there is something such that it is reproducible. sent15: if something that is an assurance does publicize it tusks Kongo. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the promontory tusks Kongo if it is an assurance that does not publicize.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the promontory tusks Kongo.; sent9 & sent7 -> int3: the promontory is an apprenticed.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the promontory does tusk Kongo and it does apprentice.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the promontory is not a schizogony.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the drawer is fractional thing that is not a kind of a schizogony.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__