there is something such that if that it is a kind of a glomerulus that does not mystify sustenance is not correct the fact that it does not overburden rockiness hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it does anneal and trumpets is false that it does not instrument dubbin is not false. sent2: if the camelhair is not a glomerulus then it does not overburden rockiness. sent3: there is something such that if that it is a glomerulus and does not mystify sustenance does not hold it overburdens rockiness. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a glomerulus and it does not mystify sustenance hold then the fact that it does not overburden rockiness is not false. sent5: if the fact that the misogynist is a kind of a longan and it is litigious does not hold it is not a kind of a glomerulus. sent6: there exists something such that if it mystifies fare-stage and it does not mystify dysplasia then it is not a bufflehead. sent7: if that the Aertex is a henry and is not androgynous is false it integrates buffalofish. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a glomerulus is not incorrect then that it does not overburden rockiness is right. sent9: if that the orphrey is hot thing that is a kind of a glomerulus is not true then it is not heartless. sent10: the camelhair does not overburden rockiness if the fact that that it is a glomerulus and it mystifies sustenance hold is not correct. sent11: the camelhair does overburden rockiness if the fact that it is a kind of a glomerulus and does not mystify sustenance is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is Goethean and it does not trumpet is false then it is a cicada. sent13: if the camelhair is a glomerulus but it does not mystify sustenance then that it does not overburden rockiness is correct. sent14: something does not overburden rockiness if it is not a glomerulus. sent15: the camelhair is not a glomerulus if the fact that it is both a latke and not a Karloff is not correct. sent16: something does not overburden rockiness if it is a glomerulus and it does not mystify sustenance. sent17: there exists something such that if it is unlikable and does not integrate woodgrain it is not a taxer. sent18: if that the camelhair is a adenopathy and it is an ombudsman does not hold it does not overburden rockiness. sent19: if the fact that something is a kind of a glomerulus that does not mystify sustenance is not right it does overburden rockiness.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a kind of a glomerulus that does not mystify sustenance is not correct the fact that it does not overburden rockiness hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it does anneal and trumpets is false that it does not instrument dubbin is not false. sent2: if the camelhair is not a glomerulus then it does not overburden rockiness. sent3: there is something such that if that it is a glomerulus and does not mystify sustenance does not hold it overburdens rockiness. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a glomerulus and it does not mystify sustenance hold then the fact that it does not overburden rockiness is not false. sent5: if the fact that the misogynist is a kind of a longan and it is litigious does not hold it is not a kind of a glomerulus. sent6: there exists something such that if it mystifies fare-stage and it does not mystify dysplasia then it is not a bufflehead. sent7: if that the Aertex is a henry and is not androgynous is false it integrates buffalofish. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a glomerulus is not incorrect then that it does not overburden rockiness is right. sent9: if that the orphrey is hot thing that is a kind of a glomerulus is not true then it is not heartless. sent10: the camelhair does not overburden rockiness if the fact that that it is a glomerulus and it mystifies sustenance hold is not correct. sent11: the camelhair does overburden rockiness if the fact that it is a kind of a glomerulus and does not mystify sustenance is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is Goethean and it does not trumpet is false then it is a cicada. sent13: if the camelhair is a glomerulus but it does not mystify sustenance then that it does not overburden rockiness is correct. sent14: something does not overburden rockiness if it is not a glomerulus. sent15: the camelhair is not a glomerulus if the fact that it is both a latke and not a Karloff is not correct. sent16: something does not overburden rockiness if it is a glomerulus and it does not mystify sustenance. sent17: there exists something such that if it is unlikable and does not integrate woodgrain it is not a taxer. sent18: if that the camelhair is a adenopathy and it is an ombudsman does not hold it does not overburden rockiness. sent19: if the fact that something is a kind of a glomerulus that does not mystify sustenance is not right it does overburden rockiness. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__