the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not apocrine and it is a masterstroke hold it is not political is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the stoker is not political hold if it is apocrine a masterstroke. sent2: the fact that if something is non-apocrine but it reschedules pyramid it is not a kind of a filth is not false. sent3: the stoker is not political if it is not apocrine and it is a masterstroke. sent4: the fact that the stoker is political is right if it is both not apocrine and a masterstroke. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not apocrine and it is a kind of a masterstroke it is political. sent6: there is something such that if it is both apocrine and a masterstroke then it is not political.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the sock is not apocrine but it does reschedule pyramid it is not a filth.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not apocrine and it is a masterstroke hold it is not political is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the stoker is not political hold if it is apocrine a masterstroke. sent2: the fact that if something is non-apocrine but it reschedules pyramid it is not a kind of a filth is not false. sent3: the stoker is not political if it is not apocrine and it is a masterstroke. sent4: the fact that the stoker is political is right if it is both not apocrine and a masterstroke. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not apocrine and it is a kind of a masterstroke it is political. sent6: there is something such that if it is both apocrine and a masterstroke then it is not political. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__