that the antiferromagnetism occurs and the dwarfing educationist does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the Somerset does not occur. sent2: if the fact that not the depiction but the dwarfing educationist occurs is not right the dwarfing educationist does not occur. sent3: the interfering IDA does not occur. sent4: the fact that the depiction does not occur and the dwarfing educationist happens is not right if the interfering IDA does not occur. sent5: that the antiferromagnetism does not occur is prevented by that the Labour does not occur and the Somerset does not occur. sent6: the squeak does not occur. sent7: that the detachment and the squeak happens is brought about by that the adjustment does not occur. sent8: the adjustment does not occur if the anticyclonicness and/or the Labour occurs. sent9: if the fact that the anticyclonicness but not the Labour happens is wrong the anticyclonicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Labour happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the anticyclonicness or the Labour or both occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the adjustment does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the detachment occurs and the squeak occurs.; int3 -> int4: the squeak happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Labour does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the Labour does not occur and the Somerset does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the antiferromagnetism happens.; sent4 & sent3 -> int9: that not the depiction but the dwarfing educationist occurs does not hold.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the dwarfing educationist does not occur.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the antiferromagnetism but not the dwarfing educationist happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the antiferromagnetism occurs and the dwarfing educationist does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Somerset does not occur. sent2: if the fact that not the depiction but the dwarfing educationist occurs is not right the dwarfing educationist does not occur. sent3: the interfering IDA does not occur. sent4: the fact that the depiction does not occur and the dwarfing educationist happens is not right if the interfering IDA does not occur. sent5: that the antiferromagnetism does not occur is prevented by that the Labour does not occur and the Somerset does not occur. sent6: the squeak does not occur. sent7: that the detachment and the squeak happens is brought about by that the adjustment does not occur. sent8: the adjustment does not occur if the anticyclonicness and/or the Labour occurs. sent9: if the fact that the anticyclonicness but not the Labour happens is wrong the anticyclonicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Labour happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the anticyclonicness or the Labour or both occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the adjustment does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the detachment occurs and the squeak occurs.; int3 -> int4: the squeak happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Labour does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the Labour does not occur and the Somerset does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the antiferromagnetism happens.; sent4 & sent3 -> int9: that not the depiction but the dwarfing educationist occurs does not hold.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the dwarfing educationist does not occur.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__