the liege covers parallelogram.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is not a schnook is not wrong. sent2: if the fluoroform does not cover parallelogram and does not cover dissimilation then the fact that the weatherman does not cover parallelogram is correct. sent3: there exists something such that it is a schnook and it is a Ascaridia. sent4: the menstruation is not a kind of a schnook but it is a Ascaridia. sent5: if that the weatherman is not a kind of a Ascaridia and is a Lamaist is false the liege is a kind of a Ascaridia. sent6: if the 'hood does not admeasure Oregon and/or is not a kind of a solvent then the fact that the manganite is not a kind of a solvent is true. sent7: the fact that something is not a Ascaridia but a Lamaist does not hold if it does not cover parallelogram. sent8: the menstruation is a kind of a Ascaridia. sent9: if something that is not a kind of a schnook is a Ascaridia the liege is a Lamaist. sent10: the fluoroform does not cover parallelogram and does not cover dissimilation if the manganite is not a kind of a solvent.
sent4 -> int1: something is not a schnook but it is a Ascaridia.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the liege is a kind of a Lamaist.;
the liege is a kind of a Ascaridia.
sent7 -> int3: the fact that the weatherman is not a Ascaridia but a Lamaist does not hold if it does not cover parallelogram.;
$hypothesis$ = the liege covers parallelogram. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is not a schnook is not wrong. sent2: if the fluoroform does not cover parallelogram and does not cover dissimilation then the fact that the weatherman does not cover parallelogram is correct. sent3: there exists something such that it is a schnook and it is a Ascaridia. sent4: the menstruation is not a kind of a schnook but it is a Ascaridia. sent5: if that the weatherman is not a kind of a Ascaridia and is a Lamaist is false the liege is a kind of a Ascaridia. sent6: if the 'hood does not admeasure Oregon and/or is not a kind of a solvent then the fact that the manganite is not a kind of a solvent is true. sent7: the fact that something is not a Ascaridia but a Lamaist does not hold if it does not cover parallelogram. sent8: the menstruation is a kind of a Ascaridia. sent9: if something that is not a kind of a schnook is a Ascaridia the liege is a Lamaist. sent10: the fluoroform does not cover parallelogram and does not cover dissimilation if the manganite is not a kind of a solvent. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: something is not a schnook but it is a Ascaridia.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the liege is a kind of a Lamaist.; __UNKNOWN__