that the pedometer is not obedient but it is elysian is not correct.
sent1: if the beetle is not a twenty-nine then the pedometer is not a Polk. sent2: the beetle is a Polk if the doge is a Polk. sent3: if the beetle is a fish then it is obedient. sent4: if the transmigrante hibachis then the beetle is a kind of a hibachis. sent5: the beetle is non-photoconductive. sent6: the pedometer is not obedient and does hibachi. sent7: the doge is a kind of a Polk. sent8: the pedometer is a twenty-nine if the fact that it is not obedient and it is elysian is wrong. sent9: the pedometer is not a hibachi if the transmigrante is not a kind of a twenty-nine. sent10: if the transmigrante is not a hibachi then the beetle is not a kind of a fish and is not a Polk. sent11: the pedometer is a Polk if that the doge is a Polk is right. sent12: the fact that the transmigrante is not a kind of a hibachi is correct if that the pedometer is a twenty-nine hold. sent13: the prehensor is not a kind of a twenty-nine. sent14: the fact that the doge is a kind of a twenty-nine and is a Polk is not right. sent15: the fact that the fact that the pedometer is not a twenty-nine but it is a kind of a fish is not false is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the pedometer is both not obedient and elysian does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the pedometer is a kind of a twenty-nine.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the transmigrante is not a hibachi.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the beetle is both not a fish and not a Polk.; int3 -> int4: the beetle is not a Polk.; sent2 & sent7 -> int5: the beetle is a Polk.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the pedometer is not obedient but it is elysian is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the beetle is not a twenty-nine then the pedometer is not a Polk. sent2: the beetle is a Polk if the doge is a Polk. sent3: if the beetle is a fish then it is obedient. sent4: if the transmigrante hibachis then the beetle is a kind of a hibachis. sent5: the beetle is non-photoconductive. sent6: the pedometer is not obedient and does hibachi. sent7: the doge is a kind of a Polk. sent8: the pedometer is a twenty-nine if the fact that it is not obedient and it is elysian is wrong. sent9: the pedometer is not a hibachi if the transmigrante is not a kind of a twenty-nine. sent10: if the transmigrante is not a hibachi then the beetle is not a kind of a fish and is not a Polk. sent11: the pedometer is a Polk if that the doge is a Polk is right. sent12: the fact that the transmigrante is not a kind of a hibachi is correct if that the pedometer is a twenty-nine hold. sent13: the prehensor is not a kind of a twenty-nine. sent14: the fact that the doge is a kind of a twenty-nine and is a Polk is not right. sent15: the fact that the fact that the pedometer is not a twenty-nine but it is a kind of a fish is not false is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the pedometer is both not obedient and elysian does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the pedometer is a kind of a twenty-nine.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the transmigrante is not a hibachi.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the beetle is both not a fish and not a Polk.; int3 -> int4: the beetle is not a Polk.; sent2 & sent7 -> int5: the beetle is a Polk.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__