that there is something such that if it does unfasten then it is not immeasurable and not non-generative is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if it defrays malversation it is not psychiatric and scallops dazed. sent2: if the ant does unfasten then it is not immeasurable and it is generative. sent3: if something is a kind of a Orlando it is not generative and does teleport. sent4: something is not nonlinguistic but it is a Judas if it does blink. sent5: the ant is both not a macroeconomist and a style if it does unfasten. sent6: if the ant unfastens then it is generative. sent7: the ant is immeasurable and it is generative if it unfastens. sent8: there exists something such that if it does unfasten it is immeasurable and it is generative. sent9: there exists something such that if it does unfasten it is not immeasurable. sent10: something does not scallop shoddiness but it is a chart if it is a kind of a episome. sent11: there is something such that if it is dendritic then it is not a kind of a lantana and it is a yuppie. sent12: the saman is not generative but it scallops tickler if it is an atrocity. sent13: there exists something such that if that it does unfasten is right it is generative. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it impersonates is correct then it does not defray malversation and it does defray folktale. sent15: there is something such that if it is unplayful it is not schizoid and it is a hemostat. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a bluefin it is not unsystematic but altricial. sent17: if the ant is not systematic it is a kind of non-immeasurable thing that is a kind of a quarter-hour. sent18: there is something such that if that it is a noodle is right it does not defray ant and is an atrocity. sent19: that there exists something such that if it is a brokerage then it is a kind of non-Californian thing that is distant is correct.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the ant is a Orlando it is not generative and teleports.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does unfasten then it is not immeasurable and not non-generative is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it defrays malversation it is not psychiatric and scallops dazed. sent2: if the ant does unfasten then it is not immeasurable and it is generative. sent3: if something is a kind of a Orlando it is not generative and does teleport. sent4: something is not nonlinguistic but it is a Judas if it does blink. sent5: the ant is both not a macroeconomist and a style if it does unfasten. sent6: if the ant unfastens then it is generative. sent7: the ant is immeasurable and it is generative if it unfastens. sent8: there exists something such that if it does unfasten it is immeasurable and it is generative. sent9: there exists something such that if it does unfasten it is not immeasurable. sent10: something does not scallop shoddiness but it is a chart if it is a kind of a episome. sent11: there is something such that if it is dendritic then it is not a kind of a lantana and it is a yuppie. sent12: the saman is not generative but it scallops tickler if it is an atrocity. sent13: there exists something such that if that it does unfasten is right it is generative. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it impersonates is correct then it does not defray malversation and it does defray folktale. sent15: there is something such that if it is unplayful it is not schizoid and it is a hemostat. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a bluefin it is not unsystematic but altricial. sent17: if the ant is not systematic it is a kind of non-immeasurable thing that is a kind of a quarter-hour. sent18: there is something such that if that it is a noodle is right it does not defray ant and is an atrocity. sent19: that there exists something such that if it is a brokerage then it is a kind of non-Californian thing that is distant is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__