the bunk is monotonic and/or Eurocentric.
sent1: the terpene is a sestet if something that is monotonic is not an incompetent. sent2: if the fact that the cupflower is an incompetent is correct then the bunk is monotonic. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is incompetent and it leases tailpipe is false the tailpipe is incurable. sent4: that the tailpipe is both not a rescript and not a sestet does not hold if there is something such that it is a sestet. sent5: the cupflower is an incompetent or it is a sestet or both if the tailpipe is not a rescript. sent6: the tailpipe is not a kind of a rescript if that it is not a Permalloy and does lease wittol is wrong. sent7: if a rescript is incurable it does not elaborate neuroscience. sent8: the cupflower is not an end. sent9: that the tailpipe is not a kind of a Permalloy is not false. sent10: if the cupflower is not an end then that it is a kind of an incompetent and does lease tailpipe is wrong. sent11: that the radiochlorine is not Galilean hold. sent12: The neuroscience does not elaborate terpene. sent13: if the fact that something is not a rescript but it is a kind of a sestet is not correct it is a rescript. sent14: the fact that either something is monotonic or it is Eurocentric or both does not hold if it does not elaborate neuroscience. sent15: the tailpipe is not a kind of a rescript if it is a Permalloy. sent16: the radiochlorine does lease Knoxville and it is gallinaceous if it is not a Galilean. sent17: if there is something such that it is not incurable then the cupflower elaborates neuroscience and it is Eurocentric. sent18: the terpene does not elaborate neuroscience. sent19: there is something such that it does elaborate journalese. sent20: that that the bunk is not a rescript and is a kind of a sestet does not hold is not false if something is a kind of a rescript. sent21: if the fact that the terpene does not lease Knoxville and does not elaborate journalese is not true then the tailpipe does not elaborate journalese. sent22: if the fact that the cupflower is a sestet is correct then the bunk is monotonic. sent23: the terpene is an incurable if the tailpipe is not a Permalloy and leases wittol. sent24: that the bunk is incurable hold if the tailpipe is a kind of an incurable but it does not elaborate journalese. sent25: the stibnite is a rescript.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tailpipe is not a Permalloy but it does lease wittol.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the terpene is a kind of an incurable.;
the cupflower is Eurocentric.
$hypothesis$ = the bunk is monotonic and/or Eurocentric. ; $context$ = sent1: the terpene is a sestet if something that is monotonic is not an incompetent. sent2: if the fact that the cupflower is an incompetent is correct then the bunk is monotonic. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is incompetent and it leases tailpipe is false the tailpipe is incurable. sent4: that the tailpipe is both not a rescript and not a sestet does not hold if there is something such that it is a sestet. sent5: the cupflower is an incompetent or it is a sestet or both if the tailpipe is not a rescript. sent6: the tailpipe is not a kind of a rescript if that it is not a Permalloy and does lease wittol is wrong. sent7: if a rescript is incurable it does not elaborate neuroscience. sent8: the cupflower is not an end. sent9: that the tailpipe is not a kind of a Permalloy is not false. sent10: if the cupflower is not an end then that it is a kind of an incompetent and does lease tailpipe is wrong. sent11: that the radiochlorine is not Galilean hold. sent12: The neuroscience does not elaborate terpene. sent13: if the fact that something is not a rescript but it is a kind of a sestet is not correct it is a rescript. sent14: the fact that either something is monotonic or it is Eurocentric or both does not hold if it does not elaborate neuroscience. sent15: the tailpipe is not a kind of a rescript if it is a Permalloy. sent16: the radiochlorine does lease Knoxville and it is gallinaceous if it is not a Galilean. sent17: if there is something such that it is not incurable then the cupflower elaborates neuroscience and it is Eurocentric. sent18: the terpene does not elaborate neuroscience. sent19: there is something such that it does elaborate journalese. sent20: that that the bunk is not a rescript and is a kind of a sestet does not hold is not false if something is a kind of a rescript. sent21: if the fact that the terpene does not lease Knoxville and does not elaborate journalese is not true then the tailpipe does not elaborate journalese. sent22: if the fact that the cupflower is a sestet is correct then the bunk is monotonic. sent23: the terpene is an incurable if the tailpipe is not a Permalloy and leases wittol. sent24: that the bunk is incurable hold if the tailpipe is a kind of an incurable but it does not elaborate journalese. sent25: the stibnite is a rescript. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tailpipe is not a Permalloy but it does lease wittol.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the terpene is a kind of an incurable.; __UNKNOWN__