the domicile is not dysphemistic.
sent1: the Irish is not a Septuagint but it is a whirl if it is formic. sent2: if something is awkward then the belfry is non-formic thing that does elute Philippine. sent3: if the fact that the tichodrome is not a glance and is a reformer is not correct then it does elute cytosine. sent4: the tichodrome is dysphemistic and/or a permutation if the fact that there exists something such that it is a permutation hold. sent5: if there exists something such that it is both not a Septuagint and a whirl then the fact that the syncarp does elute cytosine is not incorrect. sent6: if something that does not elute Philippine is not formic then it is not a Septuagint. sent7: the chesterfield is a metencephalon and it is awkward. sent8: the fact that something is not a Blackfoot but a gleaner is false if it is dysphemistic. sent9: something is a permutation if it does elute cytosine. sent10: that the tichodrome does not glance and is a reformer is wrong. sent11: that the Irish is not formic is not right if the belfry is not formic and elutes Philippine. sent12: something does not elute Philippine and is not formic if it is not awkward.
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the tichodrome elutes cytosine is not false.;
the fact that the oxyacetylene is not a Blackfoot but it is a gleaner does not hold.
sent8 -> int2: that the oxyacetylene is not a Blackfoot but it is a gleaner is incorrect if it is dysphemistic.; sent12 -> int3: if the Irish is not awkward it does not elute Philippine and it is not formic.; sent6 -> int4: the syncarp is not a Septuagint if it does not elute Philippine and it is not formic.;
$hypothesis$ = the domicile is not dysphemistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the Irish is not a Septuagint but it is a whirl if it is formic. sent2: if something is awkward then the belfry is non-formic thing that does elute Philippine. sent3: if the fact that the tichodrome is not a glance and is a reformer is not correct then it does elute cytosine. sent4: the tichodrome is dysphemistic and/or a permutation if the fact that there exists something such that it is a permutation hold. sent5: if there exists something such that it is both not a Septuagint and a whirl then the fact that the syncarp does elute cytosine is not incorrect. sent6: if something that does not elute Philippine is not formic then it is not a Septuagint. sent7: the chesterfield is a metencephalon and it is awkward. sent8: the fact that something is not a Blackfoot but a gleaner is false if it is dysphemistic. sent9: something is a permutation if it does elute cytosine. sent10: that the tichodrome does not glance and is a reformer is wrong. sent11: that the Irish is not formic is not right if the belfry is not formic and elutes Philippine. sent12: something does not elute Philippine and is not formic if it is not awkward. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the tichodrome elutes cytosine is not false.; __UNKNOWN__