the fact that if the fact that the besieging axil does not occur hold then the dichroism and/or the Ionian happens is false.
sent1: the dichroism is brought about by that the regulating occurs. sent2: if the besieging acquisition occurs the claw does not occur and the Libyanness does not occur. sent3: if the algometricness happens then the carpal happens. sent4: the fact that the regulating occurs and the dichroism occurs is wrong if the Ionian does not occur. sent5: the vitiliginousness does not occur if the fact that the bowling vizier does not occur but the vitiliginousness occurs is incorrect. sent6: the ticktock does not occur if the fact that the vitiliginousness does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the propping burdensomeness occurs is not false. sent8: the exocrine does not occur. sent9: if the raping does not occur that the bowling vizier does not occur and the vitiliginousness happens is false. sent10: that the soldiering happens is true. sent11: the dichroism happens or the Ionianness occurs or both if the besieging axil occurs. sent12: the fact that the Ionian and the regulating occurs is not true if that the dichroism does not occur is correct. sent13: if the sideswiping does not occur the fascistness occurs and/or the besieging moraine occurs. sent14: the mercy does not occur. sent15: that the dichroism does not occur is triggered by that the clawing does not occur and the Libyan does not occur. sent16: the besieging axil results in the regulating. sent17: if the besieging axil does not occur the regulating occurs. sent18: if the ticktock does not occur the besieging chondrule happens and the besieging acquisition happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the besieging axil does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the regulating occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the dichroism occurs.; int2 -> int3: the dichroism happens or the Ionian occurs or both.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the mooring endorphin occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fact that the besieging axil does not occur hold then the dichroism and/or the Ionian happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the dichroism is brought about by that the regulating occurs. sent2: if the besieging acquisition occurs the claw does not occur and the Libyanness does not occur. sent3: if the algometricness happens then the carpal happens. sent4: the fact that the regulating occurs and the dichroism occurs is wrong if the Ionian does not occur. sent5: the vitiliginousness does not occur if the fact that the bowling vizier does not occur but the vitiliginousness occurs is incorrect. sent6: the ticktock does not occur if the fact that the vitiliginousness does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the propping burdensomeness occurs is not false. sent8: the exocrine does not occur. sent9: if the raping does not occur that the bowling vizier does not occur and the vitiliginousness happens is false. sent10: that the soldiering happens is true. sent11: the dichroism happens or the Ionianness occurs or both if the besieging axil occurs. sent12: the fact that the Ionian and the regulating occurs is not true if that the dichroism does not occur is correct. sent13: if the sideswiping does not occur the fascistness occurs and/or the besieging moraine occurs. sent14: the mercy does not occur. sent15: that the dichroism does not occur is triggered by that the clawing does not occur and the Libyan does not occur. sent16: the besieging axil results in the regulating. sent17: if the besieging axil does not occur the regulating occurs. sent18: if the ticktock does not occur the besieging chondrule happens and the besieging acquisition happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the besieging axil does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the regulating occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the dichroism occurs.; int2 -> int3: the dichroism happens or the Ionian occurs or both.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__