the piranha is not a fullness.
sent1: the stockist is irrational. sent2: the gastropod is a gerontologist. sent3: the stockist letters passerine and is not an irrational if it is a drummer. sent4: if there is something such that it is non-exponential and not a bitterness the piranha is not a kind of a fullness. sent5: something is a tablet or not irrational or both if it is a drummer. sent6: something logs but it is not a kind of an enforcement. sent7: the stockist is a kind of a tensed. sent8: if something is a kind of a bitterness it is a kind of a tablet and it does not letter passerine. sent9: if the dropper letters passerine it is both not a tablet and non-irrational. sent10: the dropper is an irrational. sent11: something does log grizzle if it is a kind of a regard. sent12: if the dropper is an irrational then the fact that the stockist is a gerontologist is not incorrect. sent13: something is exponential if that it is a kind of a fullness is not false. sent14: the stepladder is a kind of a gerontologist if it is minimalist and it does not log toponym. sent15: the piranha is not a fullness if a non-exponential thing is a kind of a bitterness. sent16: if the stockist letters passerine then it is not exponential and is not a bitterness. sent17: something is an exponential but it is not irrational if it is a kind of a fullness. sent18: if the dropper is not irrational and is not a gerontologist the piranha is a fullness. sent19: there are non-Aberdonian things. sent20: something is not preanal and not a Hymenanthera. sent21: there exists something such that it does not underlie. sent22: if the stockist is a kind of a tablet and is not a drummer it letters passerine.
sent12 & sent10 -> int1: the stockist is a gerontologist.;
the piranha is a fullness.
sent5 -> int2: if the stockist is a drummer then it is a tablet and/or it is not an irrational.;
$hypothesis$ = the piranha is not a fullness. ; $context$ = sent1: the stockist is irrational. sent2: the gastropod is a gerontologist. sent3: the stockist letters passerine and is not an irrational if it is a drummer. sent4: if there is something such that it is non-exponential and not a bitterness the piranha is not a kind of a fullness. sent5: something is a tablet or not irrational or both if it is a drummer. sent6: something logs but it is not a kind of an enforcement. sent7: the stockist is a kind of a tensed. sent8: if something is a kind of a bitterness it is a kind of a tablet and it does not letter passerine. sent9: if the dropper letters passerine it is both not a tablet and non-irrational. sent10: the dropper is an irrational. sent11: something does log grizzle if it is a kind of a regard. sent12: if the dropper is an irrational then the fact that the stockist is a gerontologist is not incorrect. sent13: something is exponential if that it is a kind of a fullness is not false. sent14: the stepladder is a kind of a gerontologist if it is minimalist and it does not log toponym. sent15: the piranha is not a fullness if a non-exponential thing is a kind of a bitterness. sent16: if the stockist letters passerine then it is not exponential and is not a bitterness. sent17: something is an exponential but it is not irrational if it is a kind of a fullness. sent18: if the dropper is not irrational and is not a gerontologist the piranha is a fullness. sent19: there are non-Aberdonian things. sent20: something is not preanal and not a Hymenanthera. sent21: there exists something such that it does not underlie. sent22: if the stockist is a kind of a tablet and is not a drummer it letters passerine. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent10 -> int1: the stockist is a gerontologist.; __UNKNOWN__