that there exists something such that if it punishes nautch it is not a existentialist and is not conquerable is not right.
sent1: something that does rage is non-Wordsworthian thing that is not conquerable. sent2: there is something such that if it is a rootstock then it does not hue defacement and is not a kind of a contents. sent3: there is something such that if it is presidential then it is not a work. sent4: there is something such that if that it does input is true it does not hue Hamilton and it does not pass Salmo. sent5: if the curacao is a rootstock then it is a kind of scientific thing that does not slump. sent6: there is something such that if it punishes nautch then it is not a kind of a existentialist. sent7: the heir-at-law is not a existentialist if it is a kind of a Cheviots. sent8: the infusion is not a ELA if it is conquerable. sent9: the curacao is not a existentialist and it is not conquerable if it does punish nautch. sent10: that there exists something such that if it defrosts then it does not mist and is stagflationary is right. sent11: if the curacao does punish warrant then it is not an airworthiness and is not a tenderizer. sent12: there exists something such that if it is an airworthiness then it is not monetary and it is a kind of a permission. sent13: if the curacao is a contents it is not a kind of a keyhole.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
the curacao is not Wordsworthian and it is not conquerable if it is a rage.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it punishes nautch it is not a existentialist and is not conquerable is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does rage is non-Wordsworthian thing that is not conquerable. sent2: there is something such that if it is a rootstock then it does not hue defacement and is not a kind of a contents. sent3: there is something such that if it is presidential then it is not a work. sent4: there is something such that if that it does input is true it does not hue Hamilton and it does not pass Salmo. sent5: if the curacao is a rootstock then it is a kind of scientific thing that does not slump. sent6: there is something such that if it punishes nautch then it is not a kind of a existentialist. sent7: the heir-at-law is not a existentialist if it is a kind of a Cheviots. sent8: the infusion is not a ELA if it is conquerable. sent9: the curacao is not a existentialist and it is not conquerable if it does punish nautch. sent10: that there exists something such that if it defrosts then it does not mist and is stagflationary is right. sent11: if the curacao does punish warrant then it is not an airworthiness and is not a tenderizer. sent12: there exists something such that if it is an airworthiness then it is not monetary and it is a kind of a permission. sent13: if the curacao is a contents it is not a kind of a keyhole. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__