the anion is a pedodontist.
sent1: that the cornstarch either does not crochet grudge or is bigger or both is right if that it is not emotional is not false. sent2: something is a tailspin if the fact that it resides and is not a subdivision does not hold. sent3: if that the R-2 does resize and it is a pedodontist is incorrect then the anion is not baboonish. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a hypertension. sent5: if the cornstarch is not a hypertension then it is not emotional. sent6: the cornstarch is a tailspin if that the down-and-out does not reunify cornstarch and is a subdivision is not correct. sent7: the down-and-out is baboonish if the cornstarch does crochet grudge or is not a Scythian or both. sent8: something does reside if it does not crochet grudge. sent9: something that does not crochet grudge or is bigger or both does not crochet grudge. sent10: something is a tailspin and it is a kind of a Scythian if it does not sequence manageability. sent11: the cornstarch is not a hypertension if the fact that the R-2 is a hypertension and/or not a carhop is wrong. sent12: the shirtsleeve is not baboonish. sent13: the cornstarch is not a tailspin if the fact that the R-2 does not reside is true. sent14: if something is not a pedodontist then it resizes. sent15: that the cornstarch is a tailspin is correct if the down-and-out reunifies cornstarch. sent16: the anion does reside. sent17: that something is not a subdivision and is not baboonish is not true if the fact that it does reside is true. sent18: the cornstarch is not a tailspin if that the R-2 does reside and is baboonish is not right. sent19: the fact that the R-2 is a hypertension or is not a carhop or both is false. sent20: if something is not a kind of a pedodontist it does resize and reunifies cornstarch. sent21: if something is not baboonish that the R-2 does reside and is baboonish is not true. sent22: that the down-and-out does reunify cornstarch and is a subdivision is incorrect. sent23: if the anion does reunify cornstarch then that the down-and-out does not reunify cornstarch and is a subdivision is not true. sent24: that the down-and-out does not sequence manageability is correct. sent25: the fact that the down-and-out resides but it is not a kind of a subdivision is wrong if the fact that it is baboonish is not wrong.
sent20 -> int1: the anion resizes and does reunify cornstarch if it is not a pedodontist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anion is not a kind of a pedodontist.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the anion resizes and reunifies cornstarch.; int2 -> int3: the anion does reunify cornstarch.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the fact that the down-and-out does not reunify cornstarch and is a subdivision does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the cornstarch is a kind of a tailspin.; sent12 -> int6: there is something such that it is not baboonish.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the fact that the R-2 does reside and is baboonish is incorrect.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the cornstarch is not a kind of a tailspin.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the shirtsleeve does undulate.
sent2 -> int10: if the fact that the down-and-out does reside but it is not a kind of a subdivision does not hold then it is a kind of a tailspin.;
$hypothesis$ = the anion is a pedodontist. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cornstarch either does not crochet grudge or is bigger or both is right if that it is not emotional is not false. sent2: something is a tailspin if the fact that it resides and is not a subdivision does not hold. sent3: if that the R-2 does resize and it is a pedodontist is incorrect then the anion is not baboonish. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a hypertension. sent5: if the cornstarch is not a hypertension then it is not emotional. sent6: the cornstarch is a tailspin if that the down-and-out does not reunify cornstarch and is a subdivision is not correct. sent7: the down-and-out is baboonish if the cornstarch does crochet grudge or is not a Scythian or both. sent8: something does reside if it does not crochet grudge. sent9: something that does not crochet grudge or is bigger or both does not crochet grudge. sent10: something is a tailspin and it is a kind of a Scythian if it does not sequence manageability. sent11: the cornstarch is not a hypertension if the fact that the R-2 is a hypertension and/or not a carhop is wrong. sent12: the shirtsleeve is not baboonish. sent13: the cornstarch is not a tailspin if the fact that the R-2 does not reside is true. sent14: if something is not a pedodontist then it resizes. sent15: that the cornstarch is a tailspin is correct if the down-and-out reunifies cornstarch. sent16: the anion does reside. sent17: that something is not a subdivision and is not baboonish is not true if the fact that it does reside is true. sent18: the cornstarch is not a tailspin if that the R-2 does reside and is baboonish is not right. sent19: the fact that the R-2 is a hypertension or is not a carhop or both is false. sent20: if something is not a kind of a pedodontist it does resize and reunifies cornstarch. sent21: if something is not baboonish that the R-2 does reside and is baboonish is not true. sent22: that the down-and-out does reunify cornstarch and is a subdivision is incorrect. sent23: if the anion does reunify cornstarch then that the down-and-out does not reunify cornstarch and is a subdivision is not true. sent24: that the down-and-out does not sequence manageability is correct. sent25: the fact that the down-and-out resides but it is not a kind of a subdivision is wrong if the fact that it is baboonish is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the anion resizes and does reunify cornstarch if it is not a pedodontist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anion is not a kind of a pedodontist.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the anion resizes and reunifies cornstarch.; int2 -> int3: the anion does reunify cornstarch.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the fact that the down-and-out does not reunify cornstarch and is a subdivision does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the cornstarch is a kind of a tailspin.; sent12 -> int6: there is something such that it is not baboonish.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the fact that the R-2 does reside and is baboonish is incorrect.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the cornstarch is not a kind of a tailspin.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__