the Papuan does mortice smugness.
sent1: the henroost is a expectedness. sent2: if the Papuan does not mortice smugness the henroost is a kumquat but not insignificant. sent3: the henroost is not pathological if the fact that the local compensates henroost and it is pathological is false. sent4: the fact that the fact that the henroost is not pathological and it is not insignificant is not false does not hold if it is a expectedness. sent5: that if the fact that the henroost is not pathological hold then the henroost is a ETD and it mortices smugness is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Papuan does not mortice smugness is true.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the henroost is a kind of a kumquat and is not insignificant.; int1 -> int2: the henroost is not insignificant.; sent4 & sent1 -> int3: that the henroost is non-pathological thing that is not insignificant is not correct.;
the henroost is a ETD and is not a settle.
$hypothesis$ = the Papuan does mortice smugness. ; $context$ = sent1: the henroost is a expectedness. sent2: if the Papuan does not mortice smugness the henroost is a kumquat but not insignificant. sent3: the henroost is not pathological if the fact that the local compensates henroost and it is pathological is false. sent4: the fact that the fact that the henroost is not pathological and it is not insignificant is not false does not hold if it is a expectedness. sent5: that if the fact that the henroost is not pathological hold then the henroost is a ETD and it mortices smugness is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Papuan does not mortice smugness is true.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the henroost is a kind of a kumquat and is not insignificant.; int1 -> int2: the henroost is not insignificant.; sent4 & sent1 -> int3: that the henroost is non-pathological thing that is not insignificant is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__