there is something such that if it is not low-rise that it does not repent abiogenist and is a Myrmeleontidae is not right.
sent1: that something does repent abiogenist and it is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae is not right if it is not low-rise. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not calve then that it is not a goosefoot and it does tarnish dancing-master does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not tarnish agnomen it does not nag gob and tarnishes universal. sent4: if the communicant is low-rise that it does not repent abiogenist and it is a Myrmeleontidae is wrong. sent5: that something does not repent abiogenist but it is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae does not hold if it is not low-rise. sent6: there is something such that if it is not low-rise then that it does repent abiogenist and is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae is incorrect. sent7: if the communicant does not scorch then that it does not chomp spironolactone and is a Myrmeleontidae does not hold. sent8: if the communicant is gladiatorial then the fact that it is both not a foster-brother and low-rise is false. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not chomp spironolactone it does not poise and is a kind of a sleet. sent10: that something does not nag screen and tarnishes communicant is not true if it is not a kind of a liveried. sent11: if the rotary dulls then that it is not a pocketknife and it is low-rise is wrong. sent12: if that something is not low-rise is not incorrect then it does not repent abiogenist and is a Myrmeleontidae. sent13: there exists something such that if it is low-rise then that it does not repent abiogenist and is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae is not right. sent14: if the communicant is not low-rise it does not repent abiogenist and it is a Myrmeleontidae. sent15: the fact that the fact that the communicant is appendicular and nags bunco is not incorrect does not hold if it does not repent abiogenist. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a sectional the fact that it is a kind of mesic thing that is dulled is not right. sent17: if the fact that something is stable is not false the fact that it is not a Burger and does tarnish chlorthalidone is not true. sent18: the fact that something does not repent abiogenist and is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae is not true if it is low-rise. sent19: there is something such that if it does not escalate the fact that it is not fenestral and it does nag gob is not correct. sent20: that that the chlorthalidone is Continental and is octal is not wrong is wrong if that it is not nonconductive hold. sent21: that the fogbank is not a flicker but low-rise is false if it is not non-vitiliginous.
sent5 -> int1: if the communicant is not low-rise that it does not repent abiogenist and it is a Myrmeleontidae is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not low-rise that it does not repent abiogenist and is a Myrmeleontidae is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does repent abiogenist and it is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae is not right if it is not low-rise. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not calve then that it is not a goosefoot and it does tarnish dancing-master does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not tarnish agnomen it does not nag gob and tarnishes universal. sent4: if the communicant is low-rise that it does not repent abiogenist and it is a Myrmeleontidae is wrong. sent5: that something does not repent abiogenist but it is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae does not hold if it is not low-rise. sent6: there is something such that if it is not low-rise then that it does repent abiogenist and is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae is incorrect. sent7: if the communicant does not scorch then that it does not chomp spironolactone and is a Myrmeleontidae does not hold. sent8: if the communicant is gladiatorial then the fact that it is both not a foster-brother and low-rise is false. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not chomp spironolactone it does not poise and is a kind of a sleet. sent10: that something does not nag screen and tarnishes communicant is not true if it is not a kind of a liveried. sent11: if the rotary dulls then that it is not a pocketknife and it is low-rise is wrong. sent12: if that something is not low-rise is not incorrect then it does not repent abiogenist and is a Myrmeleontidae. sent13: there exists something such that if it is low-rise then that it does not repent abiogenist and is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae is not right. sent14: if the communicant is not low-rise it does not repent abiogenist and it is a Myrmeleontidae. sent15: the fact that the fact that the communicant is appendicular and nags bunco is not incorrect does not hold if it does not repent abiogenist. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a sectional the fact that it is a kind of mesic thing that is dulled is not right. sent17: if the fact that something is stable is not false the fact that it is not a Burger and does tarnish chlorthalidone is not true. sent18: the fact that something does not repent abiogenist and is a kind of a Myrmeleontidae is not true if it is low-rise. sent19: there is something such that if it does not escalate the fact that it is not fenestral and it does nag gob is not correct. sent20: that that the chlorthalidone is Continental and is octal is not wrong is wrong if that it is not nonconductive hold. sent21: that the fogbank is not a flicker but low-rise is false if it is not non-vitiliginous. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the communicant is not low-rise that it does not repent abiogenist and it is a Myrmeleontidae is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__