the fact that not the swiping but the arteriolarness happens is false.
sent1: the renunciation does not occur. sent2: the raise does not occur but the subatomicness occurs if that the complication does not occur is not false. sent3: the fact that the raising does not occur hold if that the expropriation but not the difficulty occurs is false. sent4: if the bacterialness does not occur then the budgeting Arizona does not occur. sent5: the fact that the expropriation occurs and the difficulty does not occur is not true if the refining Smalley does not occur. sent6: if the histologicalness occurs that the Peruvianness does not occur and the persuasiveness does not occur is not correct. sent7: if that the virginalness does not occur hold the photography does not occur. sent8: the swiping does not occur and the arteriolarness occurs if the fact that the indehiscentness happens is true. sent9: the refining Smalley is prevented by the centrosomicness and/or the non-anastigmaticness. sent10: if the subatomicness happens then that the swiping does not occur but the arteriolarness happens is false. sent11: the fact that the non-palingeneticness and the siding driftwood happens is wrong. sent12: that the destaining does not occur triggers that both the centrosomicness and the indignity happens. sent13: that the complication does not occur and the allometricness does not occur is brought about by that the indehiscentness does not occur. sent14: the palingeneticness causes that the non-vestmentalness and the non-undiplomaticness happens. sent15: if the mintiness does not occur then the fact that the siding Hibbertia but not the refining king occurs is incorrect. sent16: the peasanthood happens. sent17: the indehiscentness does not occur. sent18: if the refining king occurs the palingeneticness occurs. sent19: the fact that that the vestmentalness does not occur and the undiplomaticness does not occur hold brings about that the histologicalness happens. sent20: the refining king happens if that the siding Hibbertia occurs but the refining king does not occur is not right. sent21: the fact that the destaining does not occur if the fact that both the non-Peruvianness and the non-persuasiveness occurs is incorrect is not incorrect.
sent13 & sent17 -> int1: the complication does not occur and the allometricness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the complication does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the raising does not occur and the subatomicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the subatomicness happens is right.; sent10 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the swiping does not occur and the arteriolarness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the swiping but the arteriolarness happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the renunciation does not occur. sent2: the raise does not occur but the subatomicness occurs if that the complication does not occur is not false. sent3: the fact that the raising does not occur hold if that the expropriation but not the difficulty occurs is false. sent4: if the bacterialness does not occur then the budgeting Arizona does not occur. sent5: the fact that the expropriation occurs and the difficulty does not occur is not true if the refining Smalley does not occur. sent6: if the histologicalness occurs that the Peruvianness does not occur and the persuasiveness does not occur is not correct. sent7: if that the virginalness does not occur hold the photography does not occur. sent8: the swiping does not occur and the arteriolarness occurs if the fact that the indehiscentness happens is true. sent9: the refining Smalley is prevented by the centrosomicness and/or the non-anastigmaticness. sent10: if the subatomicness happens then that the swiping does not occur but the arteriolarness happens is false. sent11: the fact that the non-palingeneticness and the siding driftwood happens is wrong. sent12: that the destaining does not occur triggers that both the centrosomicness and the indignity happens. sent13: that the complication does not occur and the allometricness does not occur is brought about by that the indehiscentness does not occur. sent14: the palingeneticness causes that the non-vestmentalness and the non-undiplomaticness happens. sent15: if the mintiness does not occur then the fact that the siding Hibbertia but not the refining king occurs is incorrect. sent16: the peasanthood happens. sent17: the indehiscentness does not occur. sent18: if the refining king occurs the palingeneticness occurs. sent19: the fact that that the vestmentalness does not occur and the undiplomaticness does not occur hold brings about that the histologicalness happens. sent20: the refining king happens if that the siding Hibbertia occurs but the refining king does not occur is not right. sent21: the fact that the destaining does not occur if the fact that both the non-Peruvianness and the non-persuasiveness occurs is incorrect is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent17 -> int1: the complication does not occur and the allometricness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the complication does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the raising does not occur and the subatomicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the subatomicness happens is right.; sent10 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__