the argumentativeness does not occur.
sent1: that both the categorization and the cataplasticness occurs is triggered by that the slum does not occur. sent2: the slumming does not occur if the meeting fandom does not occur and the downfall does not occur. sent3: if the categorization does not occur then both the candlepins and the meeting thrust happens. sent4: if the fact that the seeking Bathyergidae does not occur is right the argumentativeness but not the nosing Weill happens. sent5: the seeking Bathyergidae happens. sent6: the fact that the argumentativeness does not occur and the candlepins does not occur is not correct if the seeking Bathyergidae does not occur. sent7: that the argumentativeness happens and the seeking Bathyergidae happens prevents the candlepins. sent8: if the categorization happens then the fact that the candlepins occurs and the meeting thrust does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the argumentativeness occurs.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: both the argumentativeness and the seeking Bathyergidae happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the candlepins does not occur.;
the nosing Weill does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the argumentativeness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the categorization and the cataplasticness occurs is triggered by that the slum does not occur. sent2: the slumming does not occur if the meeting fandom does not occur and the downfall does not occur. sent3: if the categorization does not occur then both the candlepins and the meeting thrust happens. sent4: if the fact that the seeking Bathyergidae does not occur is right the argumentativeness but not the nosing Weill happens. sent5: the seeking Bathyergidae happens. sent6: the fact that the argumentativeness does not occur and the candlepins does not occur is not correct if the seeking Bathyergidae does not occur. sent7: that the argumentativeness happens and the seeking Bathyergidae happens prevents the candlepins. sent8: if the categorization happens then the fact that the candlepins occurs and the meeting thrust does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the argumentativeness occurs.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: both the argumentativeness and the seeking Bathyergidae happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the candlepins does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__