the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Goth then that it does not stigmatize paleology and/or it is not a kind of a maneuverer is false is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the Fuji is not a Goth and/or it is not a kind of a antediluvian does not hold if it stigmatizes Fuji. sent2: the fact that the rotisserie either stigmatizes paleology or is not a kind of a maneuverer or both is not correct if it is a kind of a Goth. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Goth it does not stigmatize paleology and/or it is not a kind of a maneuverer. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Goth then the fact that it does stigmatize paleology or it is not a kind of a maneuverer or both does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it does perplex Chrysolophus the fact that it is not a Rastafarian and/or is not a silt is wrong. sent6: if something is a kind of a Goth it does not stigmatize paleology and/or is not a kind of a maneuverer. sent7: something is a kind of a maneuverer if it is a kind of a Goth. sent8: there exists something such that if it is bipolar then that either it is not a Neophron or it is not an avail or both does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it is Ghanaian then that it is not inferential and/or it does not round is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is pyroelectric the fact that either it does not stigmatize phylum or it is not unpreventable or both is not true. sent11: if that the rotisserie is a Goth hold then it does not stigmatize paleology and/or is not a maneuverer. sent12: the fact that something either is not a fairy or is not inaccurate or both is false if it is a ethologist. sent13: if the rotisserie is a Goth then it is a maneuverer. sent14: the fact that something does not stigmatize paleology or it is not a kind of a maneuverer or both is not true if it is a Goth. sent15: if something is a Goth the fact that it does stigmatize paleology and/or it is not a maneuverer is not correct. sent16: there is something such that if it is a Goth it is a maneuverer. sent17: if something is a Gropius then that it is not a Hyoscyamus and/or is not exculpatory is not right.
sent14 -> int1: the fact that either the rotisserie does not stigmatize paleology or it is not a maneuverer or both is not right if it is a Goth.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Goth then that it does not stigmatize paleology and/or it is not a kind of a maneuverer is false is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Fuji is not a Goth and/or it is not a kind of a antediluvian does not hold if it stigmatizes Fuji. sent2: the fact that the rotisserie either stigmatizes paleology or is not a kind of a maneuverer or both is not correct if it is a kind of a Goth. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Goth it does not stigmatize paleology and/or it is not a kind of a maneuverer. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Goth then the fact that it does stigmatize paleology or it is not a kind of a maneuverer or both does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it does perplex Chrysolophus the fact that it is not a Rastafarian and/or is not a silt is wrong. sent6: if something is a kind of a Goth it does not stigmatize paleology and/or is not a kind of a maneuverer. sent7: something is a kind of a maneuverer if it is a kind of a Goth. sent8: there exists something such that if it is bipolar then that either it is not a Neophron or it is not an avail or both does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it is Ghanaian then that it is not inferential and/or it does not round is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is pyroelectric the fact that either it does not stigmatize phylum or it is not unpreventable or both is not true. sent11: if that the rotisserie is a Goth hold then it does not stigmatize paleology and/or is not a maneuverer. sent12: the fact that something either is not a fairy or is not inaccurate or both is false if it is a ethologist. sent13: if the rotisserie is a Goth then it is a maneuverer. sent14: the fact that something does not stigmatize paleology or it is not a kind of a maneuverer or both is not true if it is a Goth. sent15: if something is a Goth the fact that it does stigmatize paleology and/or it is not a maneuverer is not correct. sent16: there is something such that if it is a Goth it is a maneuverer. sent17: if something is a Gropius then that it is not a Hyoscyamus and/or is not exculpatory is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the fact that either the rotisserie does not stigmatize paleology or it is not a maneuverer or both is not right if it is a Goth.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__