the potamogale is a kind of a perceptiveness.
sent1: if the fact that the abhorrer is not a kind of a peasant is right it does not monopolize curie. sent2: if the abhorrer does not frost then it does not monopolize curie. sent3: if the potamogale does not monopolize playlist then it is not a kind of a perceptiveness. sent4: that that the crocodilian is not a monism and it does not monopolize botfly hold is false if it monopolizes Quaoar. sent5: if there is something such that it does emote then the abhorrer is not a frost or it is not a kind of a peasant or both. sent6: if the abhorrer is not incorrect but it does monopolize Quaoar the crocodilian does monopolize Quaoar. sent7: something is a kind of non-incorrect thing that does monopolize Quaoar if it does not monopolize curie. sent8: if something that is a kind of an emigration is chaffy then the copywriter is disintegrative. sent9: there exists nothing that either is not a monism or does not clamor decasyllable or both. sent10: that if the copywriter is not inefficacious then the copywriter is not an illiterate is true. sent11: if the coccobacillus is a bristle the copywriter is an illiterate. sent12: something is both not a perceptiveness and disintegrative. sent13: there is something such that it does emote. sent14: there exists something such that it is both an emigration and chaffy. sent15: something is a perceptiveness and/or not chaffy if it is a kind of an emigration. sent16: if the copywriter is a perceptiveness then the potamogale is a perceptiveness. sent17: the copywriter is not a bristle if that that the coccobacillus is not a monism and/or does not clamor decasyllable is wrong is right. sent18: if the fact that something is inefficacious but it is not disintegrative is not true it is a kind of an emigration. sent19: if something is disintegrative then it is not inefficacious. sent20: the coccobacillus bristles and it does monopolize playlist if the Winchester does not clamor decasyllable. sent21: the potamogale does not monopolize playlist if there is something such that it is not an illiterate and not a bristle. sent22: there exists something such that it is an illiterate that is not a bristle.
sent14 & sent8 -> int1: the copywriter is disintegrative.; sent19 -> int2: that the copywriter is not inefficacious is true if it is disintegrative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the copywriter is not inefficacious.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the copywriter is not an illiterate.; sent9 -> int5: that the coccobacillus is not a monism or it does not clamor decasyllable or both is false.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the copywriter does not bristle.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the copywriter is not a kind of an illiterate and it is not a bristle.; int7 -> int8: something is not a kind of an illiterate and it is not a bristle.; int8 & sent21 -> int9: the potamogale does not monopolize playlist.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the potamogale is a kind of a perceptiveness.
sent15 -> int10: if the copywriter is an emigration the fact that it is a perceptiveness and/or it is not chaffy is not wrong.; sent18 -> int11: the copywriter is an emigration if that it is a kind of inefficacious thing that is not disintegrative is false.; sent7 -> int12: the abhorrer is a kind of non-incorrect thing that monopolizes Quaoar if it does not monopolize curie.; sent13 & sent5 -> int13: the abhorrer is not a frost and/or it is not a peasant.; int13 & sent2 & sent1 -> int14: the abhorrer does not monopolize curie.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the abhorrer is not incorrect and does monopolize Quaoar.; sent6 & int15 -> int16: the crocodilian does monopolize Quaoar.; sent4 & int16 -> int17: that the crocodilian is not a monism and it does not monopolize botfly is not correct.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a monism and does not monopolize botfly is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the potamogale is a kind of a perceptiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the abhorrer is not a kind of a peasant is right it does not monopolize curie. sent2: if the abhorrer does not frost then it does not monopolize curie. sent3: if the potamogale does not monopolize playlist then it is not a kind of a perceptiveness. sent4: that that the crocodilian is not a monism and it does not monopolize botfly hold is false if it monopolizes Quaoar. sent5: if there is something such that it does emote then the abhorrer is not a frost or it is not a kind of a peasant or both. sent6: if the abhorrer is not incorrect but it does monopolize Quaoar the crocodilian does monopolize Quaoar. sent7: something is a kind of non-incorrect thing that does monopolize Quaoar if it does not monopolize curie. sent8: if something that is a kind of an emigration is chaffy then the copywriter is disintegrative. sent9: there exists nothing that either is not a monism or does not clamor decasyllable or both. sent10: that if the copywriter is not inefficacious then the copywriter is not an illiterate is true. sent11: if the coccobacillus is a bristle the copywriter is an illiterate. sent12: something is both not a perceptiveness and disintegrative. sent13: there is something such that it does emote. sent14: there exists something such that it is both an emigration and chaffy. sent15: something is a perceptiveness and/or not chaffy if it is a kind of an emigration. sent16: if the copywriter is a perceptiveness then the potamogale is a perceptiveness. sent17: the copywriter is not a bristle if that that the coccobacillus is not a monism and/or does not clamor decasyllable is wrong is right. sent18: if the fact that something is inefficacious but it is not disintegrative is not true it is a kind of an emigration. sent19: if something is disintegrative then it is not inefficacious. sent20: the coccobacillus bristles and it does monopolize playlist if the Winchester does not clamor decasyllable. sent21: the potamogale does not monopolize playlist if there is something such that it is not an illiterate and not a bristle. sent22: there exists something such that it is an illiterate that is not a bristle. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent8 -> int1: the copywriter is disintegrative.; sent19 -> int2: that the copywriter is not inefficacious is true if it is disintegrative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the copywriter is not inefficacious.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the copywriter is not an illiterate.; sent9 -> int5: that the coccobacillus is not a monism or it does not clamor decasyllable or both is false.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the copywriter does not bristle.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the copywriter is not a kind of an illiterate and it is not a bristle.; int7 -> int8: something is not a kind of an illiterate and it is not a bristle.; int8 & sent21 -> int9: the potamogale does not monopolize playlist.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__