the startle is not a hypogonadism.
sent1: the europium is not a pan. sent2: the fact that the startle is a hypogonadism is not wrong if the fact that the bridle is both not a pan and not a hypsography is not correct. sent3: that that the nitrocalcite does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and is not a hypsography is true is false. sent4: if there is something such that that it does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and it is not nonreflective is not right then the europium is a kind of a hypsography. sent5: if the bridle is a hypsography the fact that the nitrocalcite is not nonreflective and it is not a hypsography is false. sent6: if that the europium is a hypsography is right then the fact that the bridle is not a pan and it is not a hypsography is not true. sent7: the nitrocalcite is nonreflective. sent8: that the startle is not a hypogonadism but it is a kind of a hypsography is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nitrocalcite does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and is not nonreflective.; assump1 -> int1: the nitrocalcite is not nonreflective.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the nitrocalcite does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and is not nonreflective does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and is not nonreflective does not hold.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the europium is a hypsography.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: that the bridle is not a pan and it is not a hypsography does not hold.; sent2 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the startle is not a hypogonadism. ; $context$ = sent1: the europium is not a pan. sent2: the fact that the startle is a hypogonadism is not wrong if the fact that the bridle is both not a pan and not a hypsography is not correct. sent3: that that the nitrocalcite does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and is not a hypsography is true is false. sent4: if there is something such that that it does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and it is not nonreflective is not right then the europium is a kind of a hypsography. sent5: if the bridle is a hypsography the fact that the nitrocalcite is not nonreflective and it is not a hypsography is false. sent6: if that the europium is a hypsography is right then the fact that the bridle is not a pan and it is not a hypsography is not true. sent7: the nitrocalcite is nonreflective. sent8: that the startle is not a hypogonadism but it is a kind of a hypsography is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nitrocalcite does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and is not nonreflective.; assump1 -> int1: the nitrocalcite is not nonreflective.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the nitrocalcite does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and is not nonreflective does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it does not orchestrate robe-de-chambre and is not nonreflective does not hold.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the europium is a hypsography.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: that the bridle is not a pan and it is not a hypsography does not hold.; sent2 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__