that if that the corynebacterium does tunnel privation is not incorrect the filmmaker is slippery is not right.
sent1: if that the cheesemonger is non-intestinal or it does not congee or both is not right then it is not a catwalk. sent2: the corynebacterium does not tunnel privation if it does own confabulation and it is a catwalk. sent3: if the cheesemonger is not intestinal or is not a congee or both then the filmmaker is slippery. sent4: the filmmaker is slippery if the cheesemonger does not congee. sent5: if that something is not a catwalk and it does not tunnel privation is incorrect then that it is slippery is not correct. sent6: if something does not own confabulation but it is a kind of a catwalk it does not tunnel privation. sent7: the cheesemonger is a congee. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a catwalk and it does not tunnel privation is not right if it owns confabulation. sent9: if the corynebacterium does not own confabulation but it is a catwalk then it is intestinal. sent10: the rotenone is not slippery. sent11: if the corynebacterium is not a kind of a catwalk the cheesemonger does not own confabulation. sent12: if the corynebacterium owns confabulation and is intestinal it is not a catwalk. sent13: the corynebacterium either does not congee or is a catwalk or both. sent14: the fact that the corynebacterium does not own confabulation is right. sent15: the corynebacterium does not own confabulation and is a catwalk if the cheesemonger is not a catwalk. sent16: the cheesemonger does not bowl but it is buccal. sent17: the cheesemonger is not rotatory if the corynebacterium does peck TRM and is rotatory.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the cheesemonger is not intestinal or it is not a congee or both is not right.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the cheesemonger is not a catwalk.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the corynebacterium does not own confabulation and is a catwalk.; sent6 -> int3: if the corynebacterium does not own confabulation but it is a kind of a catwalk that it does not tunnel privation hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the corynebacterium does not tunnel privation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corynebacterium does tunnel privation.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the cheesemonger is not intestinal or it does not congee or both.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the filmmaker is slippery.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the antique is not slippery.
sent5 -> int8: if that the antique is not a catwalk and it does not tunnel privation is not correct it is not slippery.; sent8 -> int9: the fact that the antique is not a catwalk and does not tunnel privation is not right if it owns confabulation.; sent16 -> int10: the cheesemonger is buccal.;
$hypothesis$ = that if that the corynebacterium does tunnel privation is not incorrect the filmmaker is slippery is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the cheesemonger is non-intestinal or it does not congee or both is not right then it is not a catwalk. sent2: the corynebacterium does not tunnel privation if it does own confabulation and it is a catwalk. sent3: if the cheesemonger is not intestinal or is not a congee or both then the filmmaker is slippery. sent4: the filmmaker is slippery if the cheesemonger does not congee. sent5: if that something is not a catwalk and it does not tunnel privation is incorrect then that it is slippery is not correct. sent6: if something does not own confabulation but it is a kind of a catwalk it does not tunnel privation. sent7: the cheesemonger is a congee. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a catwalk and it does not tunnel privation is not right if it owns confabulation. sent9: if the corynebacterium does not own confabulation but it is a catwalk then it is intestinal. sent10: the rotenone is not slippery. sent11: if the corynebacterium is not a kind of a catwalk the cheesemonger does not own confabulation. sent12: if the corynebacterium owns confabulation and is intestinal it is not a catwalk. sent13: the corynebacterium either does not congee or is a catwalk or both. sent14: the fact that the corynebacterium does not own confabulation is right. sent15: the corynebacterium does not own confabulation and is a catwalk if the cheesemonger is not a catwalk. sent16: the cheesemonger does not bowl but it is buccal. sent17: the cheesemonger is not rotatory if the corynebacterium does peck TRM and is rotatory. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the cheesemonger is not intestinal or it is not a congee or both is not right.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the cheesemonger is not a catwalk.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the corynebacterium does not own confabulation and is a catwalk.; sent6 -> int3: if the corynebacterium does not own confabulation but it is a kind of a catwalk that it does not tunnel privation hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the corynebacterium does not tunnel privation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corynebacterium does tunnel privation.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the cheesemonger is not intestinal or it does not congee or both.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the filmmaker is slippery.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__