the carbonate is useless.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it narrates viscometry and it is nosohusial is false the six-pack narrates Clemenceau. sent2: if that something is a paroxysm or it is not a kind of a mushroom or both is false then it is not a tandem. sent3: the emporium does not suppose. sent4: if the dredger does not deprive marten then that it narrates viscometry and it is nosohusial is false. sent5: the emporium supposes if the ouzo is italic but it is not a kind of a radial. sent6: the captain is not a kind of a radial if the carbonate is not italic and it is not a kind of a radial. sent7: that the carbonate is a kind of a procrastinator is right. sent8: the ouzo does not suppose if the emporium is not a kind of a Norman and is sublunar. sent9: that the emporium is either a paroxysm or not a mushroom or both does not hold if the six-pack narrates Clemenceau. sent10: that the carbonate is a kind of the italic if the carbonate does subject decadent or it is not a kind of a procrastinator or both is not incorrect. sent11: the carbonate is an italic if it is not a kind of a procrastinator. sent12: the carbonate is useless if the fact that it does subject decadent and/or it is not a procrastinator is not true. sent13: either the carbonate subjects decadent or it is a procrastinator or both. sent14: the bowler is a kind of a bloodstone that does not deprive marten. sent15: the carbonate is useless if that it does subject decadent and/or it is a procrastinator is not true. sent16: the ouzo is an italic. sent17: if something is not a tandem then it is not a kind of a Norman and it is sublunar. sent18: the ouzo is a kind of an italic if the carbonate is a kind of an italic. sent19: the fact that something is both not italic and not radial does not hold if it does not suppose. sent20: something does cutinize sketcher and is not useless if it is not a kind of a radial. sent21: if the bowler is a bloodstone but it does not deprive marten then the dredger does not deprive marten.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carbonate does subject decadent and/or is not a procrastinator.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the carbonate is a kind of an italic.;
the captain cutinizes sketcher but it is not useless.
sent20 -> int2: the captain does cutinize sketcher but it is not useless if it is not a kind of a radial.;
$hypothesis$ = the carbonate is useless. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it narrates viscometry and it is nosohusial is false the six-pack narrates Clemenceau. sent2: if that something is a paroxysm or it is not a kind of a mushroom or both is false then it is not a tandem. sent3: the emporium does not suppose. sent4: if the dredger does not deprive marten then that it narrates viscometry and it is nosohusial is false. sent5: the emporium supposes if the ouzo is italic but it is not a kind of a radial. sent6: the captain is not a kind of a radial if the carbonate is not italic and it is not a kind of a radial. sent7: that the carbonate is a kind of a procrastinator is right. sent8: the ouzo does not suppose if the emporium is not a kind of a Norman and is sublunar. sent9: that the emporium is either a paroxysm or not a mushroom or both does not hold if the six-pack narrates Clemenceau. sent10: that the carbonate is a kind of the italic if the carbonate does subject decadent or it is not a kind of a procrastinator or both is not incorrect. sent11: the carbonate is an italic if it is not a kind of a procrastinator. sent12: the carbonate is useless if the fact that it does subject decadent and/or it is not a procrastinator is not true. sent13: either the carbonate subjects decadent or it is a procrastinator or both. sent14: the bowler is a kind of a bloodstone that does not deprive marten. sent15: the carbonate is useless if that it does subject decadent and/or it is a procrastinator is not true. sent16: the ouzo is an italic. sent17: if something is not a tandem then it is not a kind of a Norman and it is sublunar. sent18: the ouzo is a kind of an italic if the carbonate is a kind of an italic. sent19: the fact that something is both not italic and not radial does not hold if it does not suppose. sent20: something does cutinize sketcher and is not useless if it is not a kind of a radial. sent21: if the bowler is a bloodstone but it does not deprive marten then the dredger does not deprive marten. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carbonate does subject decadent and/or is not a procrastinator.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the carbonate is a kind of an italic.; __UNKNOWN__