the fact that the cryocautery is a Rwandan but it is non-deformational is wrong.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is not undesirous and it is a cookware does not hold the hollowware does not hire. sent2: the fact that the spitball does not eviscerate optative and is a sixtieth is not true. sent3: something does hire if it is capable. sent4: if there exists something such that that it does not eviscerate optative and it is a sixtieth is not right the cryocautery is a kind of a Rwandan. sent5: that the spitball is not a sixtieth and it is not a kind of a fraternity is not true if it does not eviscerate optative. sent6: something is dialectal if it is a tine. sent7: something is capable if it is dialectal. sent8: there is something such that that it is both not undesirous and a cookware is wrong. sent9: if the fact that the spitball is not a sixtieth and it is not a fraternity is wrong the hollowware is a kind of a tine. sent10: the spitball does not eviscerate optative if the cryocautery is a kind of a Rwandan and is not deformational.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cryocautery is a Rwandan but it is not deformational.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the spitball does not eviscerate optative hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that that the spitball is not a sixtieth and is not a kind of a fraternity is wrong is not incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the hollowware is a kind of a tine.; sent6 -> int4: if the hollowware is a tine then it is dialectal.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hollowware is dialectal.; sent7 -> int6: if the hollowware is dialectal it is capable.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the hollowware is capable.; sent3 -> int8: the hollowware does hire if it is capable.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the hollowware is a hire.; sent8 & sent1 -> int10: that the hollowware is not a kind of a hire is not incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the cryocautery is a Rwandan but it is not deformational.
sent2 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it does not eviscerate optative and it is a sixtieth is not true.; int12 & sent4 -> int13: the cryocautery is a Rwandan.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cryocautery is a Rwandan but it is non-deformational is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is not undesirous and it is a cookware does not hold the hollowware does not hire. sent2: the fact that the spitball does not eviscerate optative and is a sixtieth is not true. sent3: something does hire if it is capable. sent4: if there exists something such that that it does not eviscerate optative and it is a sixtieth is not right the cryocautery is a kind of a Rwandan. sent5: that the spitball is not a sixtieth and it is not a kind of a fraternity is not true if it does not eviscerate optative. sent6: something is dialectal if it is a tine. sent7: something is capable if it is dialectal. sent8: there is something such that that it is both not undesirous and a cookware is wrong. sent9: if the fact that the spitball is not a sixtieth and it is not a fraternity is wrong the hollowware is a kind of a tine. sent10: the spitball does not eviscerate optative if the cryocautery is a kind of a Rwandan and is not deformational. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cryocautery is a Rwandan but it is not deformational.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the spitball does not eviscerate optative hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that that the spitball is not a sixtieth and is not a kind of a fraternity is wrong is not incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the hollowware is a kind of a tine.; sent6 -> int4: if the hollowware is a tine then it is dialectal.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hollowware is dialectal.; sent7 -> int6: if the hollowware is dialectal it is capable.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the hollowware is capable.; sent3 -> int8: the hollowware does hire if it is capable.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the hollowware is a hire.; sent8 & sent1 -> int10: that the hollowware is not a kind of a hire is not incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__