there exists something such that if it is a data then it is a clews.
sent1: the posterior is a cavalla. sent2: if the cygnet is a kind of an intellectual then the stump is a kind of an intellectual. sent3: the posterior is eolithic if it heaps. sent4: the fact that the beguine pieces natrolite and does not clone pajama is not false if it is cardiopulmonary. sent5: if the posterior is a kind of a data the fact that it does not scuff reserpine and does not heap does not hold. sent6: if the posterior scuffs reserpine then it is a clews. sent7: if something does piece natrolite the sunrise is testamentary. sent8: something is not a squark if that it is a collect but not a manglietia is not correct. sent9: if the reserpine is a sign the fact that the fact that it does not scuff reserpine and is not a souk is correct is not true. sent10: the fact that the posterior does scuff reserpine but it does not heap is wrong. sent11: if the fact that something does not scuff reserpine and it does not heap is not correct then it is a clews. sent12: if the stump is intellectual then the fact that it is not a clews and pieces canalization does not hold. sent13: the numbers is a kind of a data. sent14: something is a transsexualism if it is not a kind of a data. sent15: if something is testamentary the fact that it is a collect but not a manglietia is incorrect. sent16: if something scuffs reserpine then it is a clews. sent17: the beguine is cardiopulmonary. sent18: if the sunrise is not a squark then the cygnet is an intellectual and does scuff runaway. sent19: the fact that the posterior does scuff reserpine but it does not heap is not true if that it is a data is not incorrect. sent20: that if the fact that the posterior is not a clews and not the horsecloth is false then the posterior does regress is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the posterior is a data.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the posterior does not scuff reserpine and does not heap is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the posterior does not scuff reserpine and it does not heap is not correct then it is a clews.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the posterior is a kind of a clews.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the posterior is a clews if it is a data.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the posterior is a transsexualism.
sent14 -> int5: if the posterior is not a data then it is a kind of a transsexualism.; sent8 -> int6: the sunrise is not a kind of a squark if the fact that it is a kind of a collect that is not a manglietia is not right.; sent15 -> int7: the fact that the sunrise is a collect that is not a manglietia is incorrect if it is testamentary.; sent4 & sent17 -> int8: the beguine pieces natrolite and does not clone pajama.; int8 -> int9: the beguine pieces natrolite.; int9 -> int10: something does piece natrolite.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the sunrise is not non-testamentary.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the sunrise is a collect that is not a manglietia is false.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the sunrise is not a squark.; sent18 & int13 -> int14: the cygnet is a kind of an intellectual and it scuffs runaway.; int14 -> int15: that the cygnet is an intellectual hold.; sent2 & int15 -> int16: the stump is an intellectual.; sent12 & int16 -> int17: that the stump is not a clews but it does piece canalization is not right.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a clews and does piece canalization is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a data then it is a clews. ; $context$ = sent1: the posterior is a cavalla. sent2: if the cygnet is a kind of an intellectual then the stump is a kind of an intellectual. sent3: the posterior is eolithic if it heaps. sent4: the fact that the beguine pieces natrolite and does not clone pajama is not false if it is cardiopulmonary. sent5: if the posterior is a kind of a data the fact that it does not scuff reserpine and does not heap does not hold. sent6: if the posterior scuffs reserpine then it is a clews. sent7: if something does piece natrolite the sunrise is testamentary. sent8: something is not a squark if that it is a collect but not a manglietia is not correct. sent9: if the reserpine is a sign the fact that the fact that it does not scuff reserpine and is not a souk is correct is not true. sent10: the fact that the posterior does scuff reserpine but it does not heap is wrong. sent11: if the fact that something does not scuff reserpine and it does not heap is not correct then it is a clews. sent12: if the stump is intellectual then the fact that it is not a clews and pieces canalization does not hold. sent13: the numbers is a kind of a data. sent14: something is a transsexualism if it is not a kind of a data. sent15: if something is testamentary the fact that it is a collect but not a manglietia is incorrect. sent16: if something scuffs reserpine then it is a clews. sent17: the beguine is cardiopulmonary. sent18: if the sunrise is not a squark then the cygnet is an intellectual and does scuff runaway. sent19: the fact that the posterior does scuff reserpine but it does not heap is not true if that it is a data is not incorrect. sent20: that if the fact that the posterior is not a clews and not the horsecloth is false then the posterior does regress is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the posterior is a data.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the posterior does not scuff reserpine and does not heap is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the posterior does not scuff reserpine and it does not heap is not correct then it is a clews.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the posterior is a kind of a clews.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the posterior is a clews if it is a data.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__