the hideaway does speak Espagnole but it is not a triumph.
sent1: the hideaway speaks Espagnole and is not a triumph if the Yemeni does update Scot. sent2: if there is something such that it does sparge burdock and does not wade the hideaway is nonechoic. sent3: if the Yemeni does update Scot the hideaway is not a triumph. sent4: the haymow is not undulatory. sent5: that something is not undulatory and/or it is not a kind of a thong is not correct if it is not nonechoic. sent6: that something does wade but it does not speak Espagnole is not right if it is a Maalox. sent7: if something is nonechoic the fact that it does sparge burdock and it does not wade is false. sent8: that the hideaway is a thong hold. sent9: if the chlorofluorocarbon does not talk it is not a Maalox. sent10: the slacks does talk if the hideaway is nonechoic. sent11: something does not wade if the fact that it is a kind of a triumph that does not talk is not right. sent12: the chlorofluorocarbon does not sparge burdock and does not wade if it is not a Maalox. sent13: the munition is not a kind of a heroics and/or it is not pyogenic. sent14: there is something such that that it is a slump and/or it does not speak vane does not hold. sent15: something is not a Maalox if the fact that it does sparge burdock and does not wade does not hold. sent16: that the soundman speaks Espagnole is right if there exists something such that the fact that it slumps or it does not speak vane or both is incorrect. sent17: everything is not undulatory and/or is not a thong. sent18: the hideaway does speak Nile if it does not speak detraction. sent19: that something is not a Maalox and updates Scot is not correct if it is not a triumph. sent20: the acetaldol is not a kind of a triumph if there is something such that it does speak Espagnole.
sent5 -> int1: if the fact that the Yemeni is not nonechoic hold then the fact that it is not undulatory and/or it is not a kind of a thong is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Yemeni is not nonechoic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Yemeni is not undulatory and/or is not a thong is wrong.; sent17 -> int3: the Yemeni is not undulatory or it is not a thong or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Yemeni is not echoic.; sent7 -> int6: if the Yemeni is nonechoic then that it does sparge burdock and does not wade is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the Yemeni does sparge burdock but it does not wade is not true.; sent15 -> int8: if the fact that the Yemeni does sparge burdock and does not wade is not true it is not a Maalox.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Yemeni is not a kind of a Maalox.; int9 -> int10: the Yemeni is not a kind of a Maalox and/or is not a kind of a talk.;
the fact that the hideaway does speak Espagnole and is not a kind of a triumph is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the hideaway does speak Espagnole but it is not a triumph. ; $context$ = sent1: the hideaway speaks Espagnole and is not a triumph if the Yemeni does update Scot. sent2: if there is something such that it does sparge burdock and does not wade the hideaway is nonechoic. sent3: if the Yemeni does update Scot the hideaway is not a triumph. sent4: the haymow is not undulatory. sent5: that something is not undulatory and/or it is not a kind of a thong is not correct if it is not nonechoic. sent6: that something does wade but it does not speak Espagnole is not right if it is a Maalox. sent7: if something is nonechoic the fact that it does sparge burdock and it does not wade is false. sent8: that the hideaway is a thong hold. sent9: if the chlorofluorocarbon does not talk it is not a Maalox. sent10: the slacks does talk if the hideaway is nonechoic. sent11: something does not wade if the fact that it is a kind of a triumph that does not talk is not right. sent12: the chlorofluorocarbon does not sparge burdock and does not wade if it is not a Maalox. sent13: the munition is not a kind of a heroics and/or it is not pyogenic. sent14: there is something such that that it is a slump and/or it does not speak vane does not hold. sent15: something is not a Maalox if the fact that it does sparge burdock and does not wade does not hold. sent16: that the soundman speaks Espagnole is right if there exists something such that the fact that it slumps or it does not speak vane or both is incorrect. sent17: everything is not undulatory and/or is not a thong. sent18: the hideaway does speak Nile if it does not speak detraction. sent19: that something is not a Maalox and updates Scot is not correct if it is not a triumph. sent20: the acetaldol is not a kind of a triumph if there is something such that it does speak Espagnole. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the fact that the Yemeni is not nonechoic hold then the fact that it is not undulatory and/or it is not a kind of a thong is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Yemeni is not nonechoic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Yemeni is not undulatory and/or is not a thong is wrong.; sent17 -> int3: the Yemeni is not undulatory or it is not a thong or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Yemeni is not echoic.; sent7 -> int6: if the Yemeni is nonechoic then that it does sparge burdock and does not wade is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the Yemeni does sparge burdock but it does not wade is not true.; sent15 -> int8: if the fact that the Yemeni does sparge burdock and does not wade is not true it is not a Maalox.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Yemeni is not a kind of a Maalox.; int9 -> int10: the Yemeni is not a kind of a Maalox and/or is not a kind of a talk.; __UNKNOWN__