the bowing heatstroke does not occur.
sent1: the abjuring coastland occurs. sent2: that the homily happens or the magnetizing disparagement does not occur or both leads to that the balsamicness occurs. sent3: that the bowing heatstroke does not occur is triggered by that the balsamicness and the abjuring coastland occurs. sent4: if the balsamicness does not occur the abjuring coastland happens and the bowing heatstroke happens. sent5: either the homily happens or the magnetizing disparagement does not occur or both.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the balsamicness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the balsamicness occurs and the abjuring coastland occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the bowing heatstroke occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the bowing heatstroke does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the abjuring coastland occurs. sent2: that the homily happens or the magnetizing disparagement does not occur or both leads to that the balsamicness occurs. sent3: that the bowing heatstroke does not occur is triggered by that the balsamicness and the abjuring coastland occurs. sent4: if the balsamicness does not occur the abjuring coastland happens and the bowing heatstroke happens. sent5: either the homily happens or the magnetizing disparagement does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the balsamicness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the balsamicness occurs and the abjuring coastland occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__