the telephotograph is a Jainist.
sent1: the speakerphone is a kind of a Jainist. sent2: everything is a synergist. sent3: if something is a crystallographer the fact that it is a Jainist and is not subclavian is not right. sent4: everything is a crystallographer and it is subclavian. sent5: the fact that something is not a Sanskrit and it is not cardiologic is not true if it is not a boneshaker. sent6: the maid is subclavian. sent7: the inpatient gripes flooding if it does caricature Testudinidae. sent8: if the tulle is a line then that either it is not a boneshaker or it is not cardiologic or both is right. sent9: the fact that the telephotograph does prickle is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the tulle is not a debenture and not subclavian is not true if something is subclavian. sent11: the strontium is subclavian. sent12: the telephotograph is subclavian. sent13: the Wisconsinite is appetitive and/or it is loamless. sent14: if something is a crystallographer the fact that it is a kind of a Jainist is right. sent15: something is not a kind of a Sanskrit if it is not a boneshaker or it is not cardiologic or both. sent16: if the telephotograph is a kind of a low then it electrifies. sent17: the strontium is not a boneshaker. sent18: the telephotograph is appetitive. sent19: something is a Jainist and it is a crystallographer if it is not a kind of a Sanskrit. sent20: something is a debenture if the fact that it is not a debenture and it is not subclavian is wrong.
sent4 -> int1: the telephotograph is a crystallographer and subclavian.; int1 -> int2: the telephotograph is a kind of a crystallographer.; sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the telephotograph is a crystallographer is not false then it is a kind of a Jainist.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the telephotograph is not a Jainist.
sent3 -> int4: that the strontium is a kind of a Jainist but it is not subclavian is not true if it is a crystallographer.; sent5 -> int5: if the strontium is not a boneshaker that it is not a Sanskrit and it is not cardiologic is incorrect.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: that that the strontium is not a kind of a Sanskrit and is not cardiologic is false is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the telephotograph is a Jainist. ; $context$ = sent1: the speakerphone is a kind of a Jainist. sent2: everything is a synergist. sent3: if something is a crystallographer the fact that it is a Jainist and is not subclavian is not right. sent4: everything is a crystallographer and it is subclavian. sent5: the fact that something is not a Sanskrit and it is not cardiologic is not true if it is not a boneshaker. sent6: the maid is subclavian. sent7: the inpatient gripes flooding if it does caricature Testudinidae. sent8: if the tulle is a line then that either it is not a boneshaker or it is not cardiologic or both is right. sent9: the fact that the telephotograph does prickle is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the tulle is not a debenture and not subclavian is not true if something is subclavian. sent11: the strontium is subclavian. sent12: the telephotograph is subclavian. sent13: the Wisconsinite is appetitive and/or it is loamless. sent14: if something is a crystallographer the fact that it is a kind of a Jainist is right. sent15: something is not a kind of a Sanskrit if it is not a boneshaker or it is not cardiologic or both. sent16: if the telephotograph is a kind of a low then it electrifies. sent17: the strontium is not a boneshaker. sent18: the telephotograph is appetitive. sent19: something is a Jainist and it is a crystallographer if it is not a kind of a Sanskrit. sent20: something is a debenture if the fact that it is not a debenture and it is not subclavian is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the telephotograph is a crystallographer and subclavian.; int1 -> int2: the telephotograph is a kind of a crystallographer.; sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the telephotograph is a crystallographer is not false then it is a kind of a Jainist.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__