that the spinmeister is a kind of eusporangiate thing that manacles etcetera is not right.
sent1: the thymus is inexact. sent2: something is not eusporangiate if it does ebb TCP/IP and it is systematic. sent3: that the thymus does ebb TCP/IP is right. sent4: if the thymus does not manacle etcetera then the spinmeister is eusporangiate. sent5: something does ebb limeade if it manacles azote. sent6: the spinmeister is eusporangiate and manacles etcetera if the thymus does not manacles etcetera. sent7: the spinmeister ebbs limeade and it is eusporangiate. sent8: The limeade does not ebb thymus. sent9: the embalmment does not manacle etcetera and is not dextral if something does not ebb TCP/IP. sent10: everything does not invite vantage. sent11: the nitrocellulose manacles etcetera. sent12: the spinmeister is eusporangiate. sent13: something is warm thing that does manacle pickled if it does not invite vantage. sent14: the fact that the spinmeister is eusporangiate and it manacles etcetera is not right if the thymus does not ebb TCP/IP. sent15: the fact that the thymus does not ebb limeade and is not systematic does not hold. sent16: the spinmeister ebbs TCP/IP. sent17: the spinmeister is not systematic. sent18: the thymus does not ebb limeade. sent19: if something does manacle etcetera and it does ebb TCP/IP it is not systematic. sent20: the odist does not ebb TCP/IP. sent21: the coir does manacle azote if the winner is warm. sent22: That the TCP/IP does ebb thymus is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thymus manacles etcetera.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the thymus does manacle etcetera and ebbs TCP/IP.; sent19 -> int2: the thymus is not systematic if it does manacle etcetera and ebbs TCP/IP.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the thymus is not systematic.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the thymus does not ebb limeade and it is not systematic.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the thymus does not manacle etcetera.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the spinmeister is eusporangiate and does manacle etcetera does not hold is true.
sent5 -> int7: if the coir manacles azote it does ebb limeade.; sent13 -> int8: if the limeade does not invite vantage it is warm and does manacle pickled.; sent10 -> int9: the limeade does not invite vantage.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the limeade is a kind of warm thing that manacles pickled.; int10 -> int11: everything does warm and manacles pickled.; int11 -> int12: the winner does warm and manacles pickled.; int12 -> int13: the winner does warm.; sent21 & int13 -> int14: the coir manacles azote.; int7 & int14 -> int15: the coir does ebb limeade.;
$hypothesis$ = that the spinmeister is a kind of eusporangiate thing that manacles etcetera is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the thymus is inexact. sent2: something is not eusporangiate if it does ebb TCP/IP and it is systematic. sent3: that the thymus does ebb TCP/IP is right. sent4: if the thymus does not manacle etcetera then the spinmeister is eusporangiate. sent5: something does ebb limeade if it manacles azote. sent6: the spinmeister is eusporangiate and manacles etcetera if the thymus does not manacles etcetera. sent7: the spinmeister ebbs limeade and it is eusporangiate. sent8: The limeade does not ebb thymus. sent9: the embalmment does not manacle etcetera and is not dextral if something does not ebb TCP/IP. sent10: everything does not invite vantage. sent11: the nitrocellulose manacles etcetera. sent12: the spinmeister is eusporangiate. sent13: something is warm thing that does manacle pickled if it does not invite vantage. sent14: the fact that the spinmeister is eusporangiate and it manacles etcetera is not right if the thymus does not ebb TCP/IP. sent15: the fact that the thymus does not ebb limeade and is not systematic does not hold. sent16: the spinmeister ebbs TCP/IP. sent17: the spinmeister is not systematic. sent18: the thymus does not ebb limeade. sent19: if something does manacle etcetera and it does ebb TCP/IP it is not systematic. sent20: the odist does not ebb TCP/IP. sent21: the coir does manacle azote if the winner is warm. sent22: That the TCP/IP does ebb thymus is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thymus manacles etcetera.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the thymus does manacle etcetera and ebbs TCP/IP.; sent19 -> int2: the thymus is not systematic if it does manacle etcetera and ebbs TCP/IP.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the thymus is not systematic.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the thymus does not ebb limeade and it is not systematic.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the thymus does not manacle etcetera.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__