the rotisserie is not a adjuration.
sent1: the fact that the burlap is feudal and/or it is a Heisenberg is not true if there exists something such that it is a kind of a foster-brother. sent2: the fact that the monolith is a foster-brother and non-likable is wrong. sent3: the vitrification is not a kind of a adjuration. sent4: if the rotisserie is not a adjuration and not likable the burlap is not a foster-brother. sent5: something is a oscillogram. sent6: if the fact that the burlap is not a foster-brother is right then that the monolith is not a kind of a foster-brother and is not likable does not hold. sent7: the rotisserie is a Heisenberg. sent8: something is not a oscillogram if it is a kind of a Heisenberg. sent9: the burlap is not a foster-brother if the vitrification is not feudal and it is not a kind of a Heisenberg. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the fact that the monolith is not a kind of a foster-brother and it is not likable is not correct is correct then the dioxide is not a Sangay is right. sent11: the vitrification is non-feudal and it is not a Heisenberg if there is something such that it is a oscillogram. sent12: the rotisserie is a adjuration if the dioxide is not a Sangay. sent13: the burlap is a Heisenberg if there exists something such that it is likable and it is not a kind of a foster-brother.
sent5 & sent11 -> int1: the vitrification is both not feudal and not a Heisenberg.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the burlap is not a kind of a foster-brother.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the monolith is not a foster-brother and it is not likable is wrong.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the dioxide is not a kind of a Sangay.; sent12 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the rotisserie is not a adjuration.
sent8 -> int5: the burlap is not a kind of a oscillogram if it is a Heisenberg.;
$hypothesis$ = the rotisserie is not a adjuration. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the burlap is feudal and/or it is a Heisenberg is not true if there exists something such that it is a kind of a foster-brother. sent2: the fact that the monolith is a foster-brother and non-likable is wrong. sent3: the vitrification is not a kind of a adjuration. sent4: if the rotisserie is not a adjuration and not likable the burlap is not a foster-brother. sent5: something is a oscillogram. sent6: if the fact that the burlap is not a foster-brother is right then that the monolith is not a kind of a foster-brother and is not likable does not hold. sent7: the rotisserie is a Heisenberg. sent8: something is not a oscillogram if it is a kind of a Heisenberg. sent9: the burlap is not a foster-brother if the vitrification is not feudal and it is not a kind of a Heisenberg. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the fact that the monolith is not a kind of a foster-brother and it is not likable is not correct is correct then the dioxide is not a Sangay is right. sent11: the vitrification is non-feudal and it is not a Heisenberg if there is something such that it is a oscillogram. sent12: the rotisserie is a adjuration if the dioxide is not a Sangay. sent13: the burlap is a Heisenberg if there exists something such that it is likable and it is not a kind of a foster-brother. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent11 -> int1: the vitrification is both not feudal and not a Heisenberg.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the burlap is not a kind of a foster-brother.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the monolith is not a foster-brother and it is not likable is wrong.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the dioxide is not a kind of a Sangay.; sent12 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__