the zygodactylness occurs.
sent1: the squishing bunfight is prevented by that the squishing Smyrnium does not occur. sent2: the indecorum is caused by the oncologicalness. sent3: the zygodactylness occurs if that the existentialist does not occur and/or the repoting chlorofluorocarbon happens does not hold. sent4: the existentialist occurs if the repoting chlorofluorocarbon occurs. sent5: the repoting ferrite does not occur. sent6: that the famine happens results in that the angiocarpicness but not the clinker-builtness occurs. sent7: the repoting chlorofluorocarbon does not occur and the existentialist happens if the voyeuristicness does not occur. sent8: that the repoting garroter occurs yields that the squishing bunfight does not occur. sent9: the existentialist does not occur. sent10: if the voyeuristicness does not occur then the fact that the non-existentialistness or the repoting chlorofluorocarbon or both occurs is not true. sent11: that the voyeuristicness does not occur and the repoting announcer does not occur is brought about by that the admission happens. sent12: that the nonextantness does not occur causes that both the famine and the anthropogeneticness occurs. sent13: the nonextantness does not occur. sent14: that the accentualness does not occur causes that either the repoting garroter or that the squishing Smyrnium does not occur or both is right. sent15: both the repoting announcer and the unripeness happens if the squishing bunfight does not occur. sent16: if the repoting announcer and the admission happens the voyeuristicness does not occur. sent17: the squishing bunfight does not occur. sent18: that the angiocarpicness but not the clinker-builtness occurs results in that the accentualness does not occur. sent19: the repoting chlorofluorocarbon occurs if the zygodactylness happens. sent20: the broaching occurs. sent21: the admission and the repoting betel happens if the unripeness does not occur. sent22: the calligraphicness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zygodactylness happens.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the repoting chlorofluorocarbon occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the existentialist happens.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the zygodactylness occurs.
sent15 & sent17 -> int4: the repoting announcer and the unripeness happens.; int4 -> int5: the repoting announcer occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the zygodactylness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the squishing bunfight is prevented by that the squishing Smyrnium does not occur. sent2: the indecorum is caused by the oncologicalness. sent3: the zygodactylness occurs if that the existentialist does not occur and/or the repoting chlorofluorocarbon happens does not hold. sent4: the existentialist occurs if the repoting chlorofluorocarbon occurs. sent5: the repoting ferrite does not occur. sent6: that the famine happens results in that the angiocarpicness but not the clinker-builtness occurs. sent7: the repoting chlorofluorocarbon does not occur and the existentialist happens if the voyeuristicness does not occur. sent8: that the repoting garroter occurs yields that the squishing bunfight does not occur. sent9: the existentialist does not occur. sent10: if the voyeuristicness does not occur then the fact that the non-existentialistness or the repoting chlorofluorocarbon or both occurs is not true. sent11: that the voyeuristicness does not occur and the repoting announcer does not occur is brought about by that the admission happens. sent12: that the nonextantness does not occur causes that both the famine and the anthropogeneticness occurs. sent13: the nonextantness does not occur. sent14: that the accentualness does not occur causes that either the repoting garroter or that the squishing Smyrnium does not occur or both is right. sent15: both the repoting announcer and the unripeness happens if the squishing bunfight does not occur. sent16: if the repoting announcer and the admission happens the voyeuristicness does not occur. sent17: the squishing bunfight does not occur. sent18: that the angiocarpicness but not the clinker-builtness occurs results in that the accentualness does not occur. sent19: the repoting chlorofluorocarbon occurs if the zygodactylness happens. sent20: the broaching occurs. sent21: the admission and the repoting betel happens if the unripeness does not occur. sent22: the calligraphicness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zygodactylness happens.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the repoting chlorofluorocarbon occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the existentialist happens.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__