the annalist is not topological.
sent1: if the annalist does not decorate it is not topological. sent2: the annalist investigates Crossopterygii. sent3: the whistle is a kind of an upstage. sent4: there is something such that that it diffuses axiom and is not taciturn is not true. sent5: the disbeliever does not investigate Crossopterygii if there is something such that it rattles. sent6: that the epee does investigate Crossopterygii but it is not taciturn does not hold. sent7: the fact that the annalist is a FDA is not false if there is something such that that it is topological is correct. sent8: that the flooring is not a fumigant and it does not decorate is not true. sent9: if something is iridic and it does upstage then it is not responsive. sent10: the Nichrome is not topological. sent11: if that something decorates and is not a rattle is incorrect then it is not topological. sent12: if the epee investigates Crossopterygii and is not psychomotor it is a rattle. sent13: that something is not a puberty is right if it is a halfbeak. sent14: there exists nothing such that it does not investigate flophouse and is diabatic. sent15: the fact that the epee is both not a FDA and psychomotor is wrong if the disbeliever does not investigate Crossopterygii. sent16: that the Nichrome does not investigate Crossopterygii but it diffuses axiom is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that something does not investigate flophouse and is diabatic is false that it is iridic is not incorrect. sent18: if the epee does rattle the fact that the annalist does decorate but it is not a rattle does not hold. sent19: the epee does investigate Crossopterygii but it is not psychomotor if it is a FDA. sent20: if something is not responsive then that it does not shirk and it is a candor hold. sent21: the fact that the Nichrome does not diffuse axiom and is not taciturn is incorrect. sent22: if the whistle does not shirk and is a candor the flooring is not a kind of a candor. sent23: the epee is not psychomotor. sent24: something rattles and it does decorate if it is not a candor. sent25: the volleyball does not decorate.
sent21 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not diffuse axiom and it is not taciturn is not right.; sent11 -> int2: the annalist is not topological if the fact that it decorates and is not a kind of a rattle is false.;
the annalist is topological.
sent24 -> int3: the flooring is a rattle that does decorate if it is not a candor.; sent20 -> int4: if that the whistle is not responsive hold then it does not shirk and it is a candor.; sent14 -> int5: the fact that the Maldivian does not investigate flophouse but it is diabatic does not hold.; sent17 -> int6: if the fact that the Maldivian does not investigate flophouse and is diabatic does not hold then it is iridic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Maldivian is iridic.; int7 -> int8: everything is iridic.; int8 -> int9: the whistle is iridic.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the whistle is iridic and it upstages.; sent9 -> int11: the whistle is not responsive if it is both iridic and upstage.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the whistle is not responsive.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the whistle does not shirk and is a kind of a candor.; int13 & sent22 -> int14: the flooring is not a candor.; int3 & int14 -> int15: the flooring does rattle and it does decorate.; int15 -> int16: the flooring is a kind of a rattle.; int16 -> int17: something rattles.; int17 & sent5 -> int18: that the disbeliever does not investigate Crossopterygii is not wrong.; sent15 & int18 -> int19: that the epee is both not a FDA and psychomotor is false.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a FDA and is psychomotor is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the annalist is not topological. ; $context$ = sent1: if the annalist does not decorate it is not topological. sent2: the annalist investigates Crossopterygii. sent3: the whistle is a kind of an upstage. sent4: there is something such that that it diffuses axiom and is not taciturn is not true. sent5: the disbeliever does not investigate Crossopterygii if there is something such that it rattles. sent6: that the epee does investigate Crossopterygii but it is not taciturn does not hold. sent7: the fact that the annalist is a FDA is not false if there is something such that that it is topological is correct. sent8: that the flooring is not a fumigant and it does not decorate is not true. sent9: if something is iridic and it does upstage then it is not responsive. sent10: the Nichrome is not topological. sent11: if that something decorates and is not a rattle is incorrect then it is not topological. sent12: if the epee investigates Crossopterygii and is not psychomotor it is a rattle. sent13: that something is not a puberty is right if it is a halfbeak. sent14: there exists nothing such that it does not investigate flophouse and is diabatic. sent15: the fact that the epee is both not a FDA and psychomotor is wrong if the disbeliever does not investigate Crossopterygii. sent16: that the Nichrome does not investigate Crossopterygii but it diffuses axiom is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that something does not investigate flophouse and is diabatic is false that it is iridic is not incorrect. sent18: if the epee does rattle the fact that the annalist does decorate but it is not a rattle does not hold. sent19: the epee does investigate Crossopterygii but it is not psychomotor if it is a FDA. sent20: if something is not responsive then that it does not shirk and it is a candor hold. sent21: the fact that the Nichrome does not diffuse axiom and is not taciturn is incorrect. sent22: if the whistle does not shirk and is a candor the flooring is not a kind of a candor. sent23: the epee is not psychomotor. sent24: something rattles and it does decorate if it is not a candor. sent25: the volleyball does not decorate. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not diffuse axiom and it is not taciturn is not right.; sent11 -> int2: the annalist is not topological if the fact that it decorates and is not a kind of a rattle is false.; __UNKNOWN__