the replacing does not occur and the geneticsness does not occur.
sent1: the counter-sabotage occurs. sent2: the fact that the feud occurs is right. sent3: that the replacing does not occur is caused by that the counter-sabotage and the feud occurs. sent4: if the triclinicness happens and the Marathon happens then the unalterableness does not occur. sent5: that the geneticsness but not the minting happens is wrong. sent6: the geneticsness does not occur if that the geneticsness happens and the minting does not occur is not true.
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: both the counter-sabotage and the feud happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the replacing does not occur.; sent6 & sent5 -> int3: the geneticsness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the replacing does not occur and the geneticsness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the counter-sabotage occurs. sent2: the fact that the feud occurs is right. sent3: that the replacing does not occur is caused by that the counter-sabotage and the feud occurs. sent4: if the triclinicness happens and the Marathon happens then the unalterableness does not occur. sent5: that the geneticsness but not the minting happens is wrong. sent6: the geneticsness does not occur if that the geneticsness happens and the minting does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: both the counter-sabotage and the feud happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the replacing does not occur.; sent6 & sent5 -> int3: the geneticsness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__