if the bonesetter does not stumble PKD the decoupage is a trail.
sent1: if the bonesetter does stumble PKD the decoupage does trail. sent2: if something is peaty then that it trails and it does not stumble studio is wrong. sent3: the fact that the bonesetter intersects and it is a gastroscope is not true. sent4: the fact that the ytterbium is pyloric but it is not a kind of a trail is not right. sent5: the fact that the stay does intersect is right if the bonesetter stumbles PKD. sent6: if the decoupage does not intersect and is not a gastroscope then the bonesetter trails. sent7: the fact that the bonesetter does intersect and is not a kind of a gastroscope is not right. sent8: the bonesetter does trail if the decoupage is not a gastroscope and it does not stumble studio. sent9: that the jaboncillo does not intersect is not wrong. sent10: the bonesetter does not snowshoe. sent11: the decoupage is a kind of a gastroscope if the bonesetter is not a trail and it does not intersect. sent12: if the decoupage is not a gastroscope and not a trail then the bonesetter intersects. sent13: that the bonesetter is unstoppable but it is not undiplomatic is incorrect. sent14: if the fact that the bonesetter does intersect but it is not a gastroscope is incorrect then it does not stumble studio. sent15: the decoupage does not stumble PKD. sent16: if the bonesetter does not stumble studio but it does stumble PKD then the decoupage trails. sent17: the bonesetter counts crouch. sent18: if the fact that the decoupage stumbles PKD but it is not a trail is not correct then it does not intersect. sent19: the atrium is not unaggressive and it does not intersect. sent20: the decoupage trails if the bonesetter does not stumble studio and does not stumble PKD. sent21: if the fact that the bonesetter is a gastroscope is not wrong then it does not stumble studio.
sent14 & sent7 -> int1: the bonesetter does not stumble studio.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bonesetter does not stumble PKD.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bonesetter does not stumble studio and it does not stumble PKD.; sent20 & int2 -> int3: the decoupage is a trail.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the stay intersects.
sent2 -> int4: if the decoupage is peaty then that it is a trail that does not stumble studio is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = if the bonesetter does not stumble PKD the decoupage is a trail. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bonesetter does stumble PKD the decoupage does trail. sent2: if something is peaty then that it trails and it does not stumble studio is wrong. sent3: the fact that the bonesetter intersects and it is a gastroscope is not true. sent4: the fact that the ytterbium is pyloric but it is not a kind of a trail is not right. sent5: the fact that the stay does intersect is right if the bonesetter stumbles PKD. sent6: if the decoupage does not intersect and is not a gastroscope then the bonesetter trails. sent7: the fact that the bonesetter does intersect and is not a kind of a gastroscope is not right. sent8: the bonesetter does trail if the decoupage is not a gastroscope and it does not stumble studio. sent9: that the jaboncillo does not intersect is not wrong. sent10: the bonesetter does not snowshoe. sent11: the decoupage is a kind of a gastroscope if the bonesetter is not a trail and it does not intersect. sent12: if the decoupage is not a gastroscope and not a trail then the bonesetter intersects. sent13: that the bonesetter is unstoppable but it is not undiplomatic is incorrect. sent14: if the fact that the bonesetter does intersect but it is not a gastroscope is incorrect then it does not stumble studio. sent15: the decoupage does not stumble PKD. sent16: if the bonesetter does not stumble studio but it does stumble PKD then the decoupage trails. sent17: the bonesetter counts crouch. sent18: if the fact that the decoupage stumbles PKD but it is not a trail is not correct then it does not intersect. sent19: the atrium is not unaggressive and it does not intersect. sent20: the decoupage trails if the bonesetter does not stumble studio and does not stumble PKD. sent21: if the fact that the bonesetter is a gastroscope is not wrong then it does not stumble studio. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent7 -> int1: the bonesetter does not stumble studio.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bonesetter does not stumble PKD.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bonesetter does not stumble studio and it does not stumble PKD.; sent20 & int2 -> int3: the decoupage is a trail.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__