the Latvian does not occur.
sent1: that the travestying fado but not the contortion occurs does not hold if the congregating occurs. sent2: the clanking shopwindow occurs. sent3: the fact that the travestying fado and the contortion occurs does not hold if that the congregating does not occur hold. sent4: the clanking humbug and the clanking shopwindow occurs if the imperceptibleness does not occur. sent5: if that the travestying fado happens and the contortion does not occur is false then the consorting die does not occur. sent6: if the imperceptibleness happens and the hermeneuticness occurs the pedesis does not occur. sent7: the irrigating happens and/or the contrivance happens. sent8: both the Sunnah and the effleurage happens. sent9: the bimodalness does not occur. sent10: that the hermeneuticness does not occur and the consorting die does not occur triggers the Latvianness. sent11: the irrigating and the congregating happens. sent12: the clanking Goodman and the resurfacing happens. sent13: that the jockeying fertilization occurs hold. sent14: the singularness happens and the hermeneuticness happens if the travestying fado does not occur. sent15: the clanking shopwindow occurs and the imperceptibleness happens. sent16: both the pedesis and the contrivance happens. sent17: the contrivance happens. sent18: the counter does not occur and the consorting Court does not occur. sent19: if the Latvianness does not occur then that the consorting die but not the pedesis occurs is wrong.
sent15 -> int1: the imperceptibleness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hermeneuticness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the imperceptibleness occurs and the hermeneuticness happens is not incorrect.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the pedesis does not occur.; sent16 -> int4: the pedesis happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the hermeneuticness does not occur.; sent11 -> int7: the congregating occurs.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the travestying fado happens but the contortion does not occur is not right.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the consorting die does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the hermeneuticness does not occur and the consorting die does not occur.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the clanking humbug and the singularness happens is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the Latvian does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the travestying fado but not the contortion occurs does not hold if the congregating occurs. sent2: the clanking shopwindow occurs. sent3: the fact that the travestying fado and the contortion occurs does not hold if that the congregating does not occur hold. sent4: the clanking humbug and the clanking shopwindow occurs if the imperceptibleness does not occur. sent5: if that the travestying fado happens and the contortion does not occur is false then the consorting die does not occur. sent6: if the imperceptibleness happens and the hermeneuticness occurs the pedesis does not occur. sent7: the irrigating happens and/or the contrivance happens. sent8: both the Sunnah and the effleurage happens. sent9: the bimodalness does not occur. sent10: that the hermeneuticness does not occur and the consorting die does not occur triggers the Latvianness. sent11: the irrigating and the congregating happens. sent12: the clanking Goodman and the resurfacing happens. sent13: that the jockeying fertilization occurs hold. sent14: the singularness happens and the hermeneuticness happens if the travestying fado does not occur. sent15: the clanking shopwindow occurs and the imperceptibleness happens. sent16: both the pedesis and the contrivance happens. sent17: the contrivance happens. sent18: the counter does not occur and the consorting Court does not occur. sent19: if the Latvianness does not occur then that the consorting die but not the pedesis occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the imperceptibleness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hermeneuticness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the imperceptibleness occurs and the hermeneuticness happens is not incorrect.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the pedesis does not occur.; sent16 -> int4: the pedesis happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the hermeneuticness does not occur.; sent11 -> int7: the congregating occurs.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the travestying fado happens but the contortion does not occur is not right.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the consorting die does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the hermeneuticness does not occur and the consorting die does not occur.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__