the seabag corsets vestiture.
sent1: if the fact that something does not prey doxazosin but it is sexagesimal is not correct it corsets vestiture. sent2: the sylvanite does prey Adriatic. sent3: if something is hypnotic then the fact that it does not prey doxazosin and it is sexagesimal is not true. sent4: if something is not a kind of a FSH it is both illiterate and hypnotic. sent5: the sylvanite is not lowborn. sent6: The Adriatic does prey sylvanite. sent7: the fact that the sylvanite does prey Adriatic and is not lowborn does not hold if the seabag is a FSH.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seabag is a FSH.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sylvanite preys Adriatic and is not lowborn is false.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the sylvanite does prey Adriatic but it is not lowborn.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the seabag is not a FSH is not false.; sent4 -> int5: the seabag is an illiterate and is hypnotic if it is not a FSH.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the seabag is a kind of an illiterate and it is hypnotic.; int6 -> int7: the seabag is not non-hypnotic.; sent3 -> int8: if the seabag is hypnotic the fact that it does not prey doxazosin and it is sexagesimal is wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the seabag does not prey doxazosin but it is sexagesimal is not true.; sent1 -> int10: if the fact that the seabag does not prey doxazosin and is sexagesimal is wrong it does corset vestiture.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the seabag corsets vestiture. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not prey doxazosin but it is sexagesimal is not correct it corsets vestiture. sent2: the sylvanite does prey Adriatic. sent3: if something is hypnotic then the fact that it does not prey doxazosin and it is sexagesimal is not true. sent4: if something is not a kind of a FSH it is both illiterate and hypnotic. sent5: the sylvanite is not lowborn. sent6: The Adriatic does prey sylvanite. sent7: the fact that the sylvanite does prey Adriatic and is not lowborn does not hold if the seabag is a FSH. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seabag is a FSH.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sylvanite preys Adriatic and is not lowborn is false.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the sylvanite does prey Adriatic but it is not lowborn.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the seabag is not a FSH is not false.; sent4 -> int5: the seabag is an illiterate and is hypnotic if it is not a FSH.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the seabag is a kind of an illiterate and it is hypnotic.; int6 -> int7: the seabag is not non-hypnotic.; sent3 -> int8: if the seabag is hypnotic the fact that it does not prey doxazosin and it is sexagesimal is wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the seabag does not prey doxazosin but it is sexagesimal is not true.; sent1 -> int10: if the fact that the seabag does not prey doxazosin and is sexagesimal is wrong it does corset vestiture.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__