the foamflower is a Manzoni.
sent1: the designer is not a Lapp. sent2: something is a Manzoni if the fact that it reruns dunce and is not a Frankfurt does not hold. sent3: if the monstrosity is a Manzoni and concessive then the foamflower is not a Manzoni. sent4: if something is diclinous and it is concessive then it is not a actinism. sent5: the monstrosity is diclinous if there is something such that that it is not a sparrow and does not depress does not hold. sent6: the monstrosity is a kind of a actinism if the fact that it is not a Lapp and is not a kind of a actinism is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the monstrosity is not a Lapp and is not a actinism is incorrect. sent8: the foamflower is a yen and it does trundle jump. sent9: if the monstrosity is not concessive then the fact that the foamflower reruns dunce and is not a Frankfurt is not correct. sent10: the monstrosity is a Manzoni and concessive if the roof is not diclinous. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a sparrow and it does not depress is incorrect. sent12: that that the designer is unlawful and it reruns dunce is true does not hold if it is not a Lapp.
sent11 & sent5 -> int1: the monstrosity is diclinous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the monstrosity is concessive.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the monstrosity is diclinous and concessive.; sent4 -> int3: the monstrosity is not a actinism if it is diclinous and is concessive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the monstrosity is not a actinism hold.; sent6 & sent7 -> int5: the monstrosity is a actinism.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the monstrosity is not concessive is correct.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the foamflower reruns dunce but it is not a Frankfurt is not true.; sent2 -> int9: the foamflower is a kind of a Manzoni if that it does rerun dunce and it is not a Frankfurt is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the foamflower is not a Manzoni.
sent12 & sent1 -> int10: that the designer is unlawful and does rerun dunce is not right.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is unlawful and it reruns dunce does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the foamflower is a Manzoni. ; $context$ = sent1: the designer is not a Lapp. sent2: something is a Manzoni if the fact that it reruns dunce and is not a Frankfurt does not hold. sent3: if the monstrosity is a Manzoni and concessive then the foamflower is not a Manzoni. sent4: if something is diclinous and it is concessive then it is not a actinism. sent5: the monstrosity is diclinous if there is something such that that it is not a sparrow and does not depress does not hold. sent6: the monstrosity is a kind of a actinism if the fact that it is not a Lapp and is not a kind of a actinism is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the monstrosity is not a Lapp and is not a actinism is incorrect. sent8: the foamflower is a yen and it does trundle jump. sent9: if the monstrosity is not concessive then the fact that the foamflower reruns dunce and is not a Frankfurt is not correct. sent10: the monstrosity is a Manzoni and concessive if the roof is not diclinous. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a sparrow and it does not depress is incorrect. sent12: that that the designer is unlawful and it reruns dunce is true does not hold if it is not a Lapp. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent5 -> int1: the monstrosity is diclinous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the monstrosity is concessive.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the monstrosity is diclinous and concessive.; sent4 -> int3: the monstrosity is not a actinism if it is diclinous and is concessive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the monstrosity is not a actinism hold.; sent6 & sent7 -> int5: the monstrosity is a actinism.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the monstrosity is not concessive is correct.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the foamflower reruns dunce but it is not a Frankfurt is not true.; sent2 -> int9: the foamflower is a kind of a Manzoni if that it does rerun dunce and it is not a Frankfurt is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__