the franklin does not pipe esteem.
sent1: the fact that the operator is proximate but it is not homeostatic is wrong if the pyroscope is homeostatic. sent2: that the pyroscope is not knowable is true. sent3: something does not pipe esteem if it is a travelogue that is unknowable. sent4: the pyroscope is vehicular and it is quantitative. sent5: the franklin is unknowable. sent6: if the fact that something is proximate and it is vehicular hold the fact that it is not a travelogue is not incorrect. sent7: if something is vehicular then the fact that it is homeostatic is true. sent8: if that the fact that the operator is not non-proximate and not homeostatic is not true is not incorrect the franklin is a kind of a travelogue.
sent4 -> int1: the pyroscope is vehicular.; sent7 -> int2: if the pyroscope is vehicular then it is homeostatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pyroscope is homeostatic.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the operator is both proximate and not homeostatic is not correct.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the franklin is a travelogue.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the franklin is a travelogue and is unknowable.; sent3 -> int7: the franklin does not pipe esteem if it is a travelogue and it is unknowable.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the franklin does not pipe esteem. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the operator is proximate but it is not homeostatic is wrong if the pyroscope is homeostatic. sent2: that the pyroscope is not knowable is true. sent3: something does not pipe esteem if it is a travelogue that is unknowable. sent4: the pyroscope is vehicular and it is quantitative. sent5: the franklin is unknowable. sent6: if the fact that something is proximate and it is vehicular hold the fact that it is not a travelogue is not incorrect. sent7: if something is vehicular then the fact that it is homeostatic is true. sent8: if that the fact that the operator is not non-proximate and not homeostatic is not true is not incorrect the franklin is a kind of a travelogue. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the pyroscope is vehicular.; sent7 -> int2: if the pyroscope is vehicular then it is homeostatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pyroscope is homeostatic.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the operator is both proximate and not homeostatic is not correct.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the franklin is a travelogue.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the franklin is a travelogue and is unknowable.; sent3 -> int7: the franklin does not pipe esteem if it is a travelogue and it is unknowable.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__