the fact that there exists something such that if that it outsells scorch and is not a illogicality does not hold then it is a sifter is not correct.
sent1: the clairvoyant is a sifter if the fact that it does not outsell scorch hold. sent2: if that something does outsell scorch but it is not a kind of a illogicality does not hold it is a sifter. sent3: if something does scratch but it is not a kind of a flutter then it is a mountainside. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it does mold pave and does not outsell basinet does not hold then it is Chaldean. sent5: there exists something such that if it does outsell scorch and it is not a illogicality then it is a sifter. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a tocainide is right then it is a kind of a runner.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the clairvoyant does outsell scorch but it is not a illogicality does not hold the fact that it is a sifter hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it outsells scorch and is not a illogicality does not hold then it is a sifter is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the clairvoyant is a sifter if the fact that it does not outsell scorch hold. sent2: if that something does outsell scorch but it is not a kind of a illogicality does not hold it is a sifter. sent3: if something does scratch but it is not a kind of a flutter then it is a mountainside. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it does mold pave and does not outsell basinet does not hold then it is Chaldean. sent5: there exists something such that if it does outsell scorch and it is not a illogicality then it is a sifter. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a tocainide is right then it is a kind of a runner. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the clairvoyant does outsell scorch but it is not a illogicality does not hold the fact that it is a sifter hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__