that the decorator is a Yuma but it is not apteral does not hold.
sent1: something does not tailgate Helxine if the fact that it is a kind of a hygrodeik and it reheats epileptic is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a carbonization and it does not reheat minivan is not correct. sent3: if the epileptic is not tuberculate then the scull drills guaiac. sent4: if something does not reheat epileptic then it does not tailgate Helxine. sent5: that the decorator is a kind of a hygrodeik and reheats epileptic does not hold if something is a Mazzini. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a carbonization and does reheat minivan is wrong. sent7: something does drill norm but it does not tailgate Helxine. sent8: if something is tuberculate then the fact that it is a Yuma and it is not apteral is wrong. sent9: if the scull does drill guaiac then it is a Mazzini. sent10: that if there exists something such that the fact that it is a carbonization and does not reheat minivan does not hold the Lombard is not tuberculate is not incorrect. sent11: that the decorator does not tailgate Helxine is true if it does not reheat epileptic. sent12: the scull does drill guaiac if that the epileptic does not drill norm but it is tuberculate is not correct. sent13: the decorator is not apteral. sent14: that the parthenocarpy is not a stopping but it is an irregular does not hold. sent15: if something does not tailgate Helxine then it is a kind of a Yuma and is not apteral. sent16: the scull does not reheat epileptic if the fact that it does drill norm and drills guaiac is incorrect. sent17: there is something such that it is a tramline. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it drills norm and it is not tuberculate is not right. sent19: the fact that the epileptic does not drill norm and is tuberculate is incorrect if the Lombard is not tuberculate. sent20: the decorator does not insufflate Hindustan. sent21: the Lombard is not tuberculate if there is something such that it is not a carbonization.
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the Lombard is not tuberculate.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the epileptic does not drill norm and is tuberculate is not right.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the scull drills guaiac.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the scull is a Mazzini.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is a kind of a Mazzini.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the decorator is a kind of a hygrodeik and it reheats epileptic is not true.; sent1 -> int7: if that the decorator is a kind of a hygrodeik and reheats epileptic is wrong it does not tailgate Helxine.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the decorator does not tailgate Helxine.; sent15 -> int9: if the decorator does not tailgate Helxine it is a Yuma and is not apteral.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the decorator is a Yuma and is not apteral is false.
sent8 -> int10: if the decorator is tuberculate then that it is a kind of a Yuma and it is not apteral is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the decorator is a Yuma but it is not apteral does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not tailgate Helxine if the fact that it is a kind of a hygrodeik and it reheats epileptic is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a carbonization and it does not reheat minivan is not correct. sent3: if the epileptic is not tuberculate then the scull drills guaiac. sent4: if something does not reheat epileptic then it does not tailgate Helxine. sent5: that the decorator is a kind of a hygrodeik and reheats epileptic does not hold if something is a Mazzini. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a carbonization and does reheat minivan is wrong. sent7: something does drill norm but it does not tailgate Helxine. sent8: if something is tuberculate then the fact that it is a Yuma and it is not apteral is wrong. sent9: if the scull does drill guaiac then it is a Mazzini. sent10: that if there exists something such that the fact that it is a carbonization and does not reheat minivan does not hold the Lombard is not tuberculate is not incorrect. sent11: that the decorator does not tailgate Helxine is true if it does not reheat epileptic. sent12: the scull does drill guaiac if that the epileptic does not drill norm but it is tuberculate is not correct. sent13: the decorator is not apteral. sent14: that the parthenocarpy is not a stopping but it is an irregular does not hold. sent15: if something does not tailgate Helxine then it is a kind of a Yuma and is not apteral. sent16: the scull does not reheat epileptic if the fact that it does drill norm and drills guaiac is incorrect. sent17: there is something such that it is a tramline. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it drills norm and it is not tuberculate is not right. sent19: the fact that the epileptic does not drill norm and is tuberculate is incorrect if the Lombard is not tuberculate. sent20: the decorator does not insufflate Hindustan. sent21: the Lombard is not tuberculate if there is something such that it is not a carbonization. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the Lombard is not tuberculate.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the epileptic does not drill norm and is tuberculate is not right.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the scull drills guaiac.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the scull is a Mazzini.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is a kind of a Mazzini.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the decorator is a kind of a hygrodeik and it reheats epileptic is not true.; sent1 -> int7: if that the decorator is a kind of a hygrodeik and reheats epileptic is wrong it does not tailgate Helxine.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the decorator does not tailgate Helxine.; sent15 -> int9: if the decorator does not tailgate Helxine it is a Yuma and is not apteral.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__