the turnout is a dragoman.
sent1: that the breadroot does not heel thiamine but it borders lunching does not hold if it is not Hasidic. sent2: that the breadroot is not a dragoman but a rent does not hold. sent3: something heels dismissal if it does border lunching and is not a dragoman. sent4: something is not Hasidic if it does forage cine-camera and it does not rent. sent5: the turnout is insecticidal. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is a rat is not incorrect the dealer does border lunching and it heels thiamine. sent7: the limeade is not insecticidal and does not heel dismissal. sent8: that something is not a rat and it is not a dragoman is not right if it does not border lunching. sent9: the turnout is a kind of a Phragmipedium. sent10: the fact that the fact that the breadroot is a rent and it is Hasidic is not false is incorrect if the dealer borders lunching. sent11: if there exists something such that that it rats is not incorrect then the dealer does heel thiamine. sent12: the fact that the breadroot is both not a rent and Hasidic does not hold if the dealer does border lunching. sent13: if that the dealer is not a rat and it is not a dragoman is incorrect the turnout is not a dragoman. sent14: the turnout is not a dragoman if the dealer is a rat. sent15: something does rat and it does border lunching if it does not heel thiamine. sent16: the limeade does forage afterdamp if it is non-insecticidal thing that does not heel dismissal. sent17: something is a rat. sent18: the breadroot does forage cine-camera if it is a rent. sent19: that the breadroot does rent and it is Hasidic is wrong. sent20: something that is a Phragmipedium and does not heel dismissal is a dragoman. sent21: the dealer heels thiamine. sent22: the turnout does not heel dismissal if that it does forage afterdamp and it is insecticidal is not false. sent23: the chemosynthesis forages afterdamp. sent24: if the breadroot forages cine-camera the turnout forages afterdamp.
sent17 & sent6 -> int1: the dealer does border lunching and it heels thiamine.; int1 -> int2: the dealer borders lunching.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the breadroot is not a rent and is Hasidic is incorrect.; sent20 -> int4: if the turnout is a kind of a Phragmipedium and does not heel dismissal then it is a dragoman.;
the turnout is not a dragoman.
sent15 -> int5: if that the dealer does not heel thiamine is correct then it rats and it borders lunching.;
$hypothesis$ = the turnout is a dragoman. ; $context$ = sent1: that the breadroot does not heel thiamine but it borders lunching does not hold if it is not Hasidic. sent2: that the breadroot is not a dragoman but a rent does not hold. sent3: something heels dismissal if it does border lunching and is not a dragoman. sent4: something is not Hasidic if it does forage cine-camera and it does not rent. sent5: the turnout is insecticidal. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is a rat is not incorrect the dealer does border lunching and it heels thiamine. sent7: the limeade is not insecticidal and does not heel dismissal. sent8: that something is not a rat and it is not a dragoman is not right if it does not border lunching. sent9: the turnout is a kind of a Phragmipedium. sent10: the fact that the fact that the breadroot is a rent and it is Hasidic is not false is incorrect if the dealer borders lunching. sent11: if there exists something such that that it rats is not incorrect then the dealer does heel thiamine. sent12: the fact that the breadroot is both not a rent and Hasidic does not hold if the dealer does border lunching. sent13: if that the dealer is not a rat and it is not a dragoman is incorrect the turnout is not a dragoman. sent14: the turnout is not a dragoman if the dealer is a rat. sent15: something does rat and it does border lunching if it does not heel thiamine. sent16: the limeade does forage afterdamp if it is non-insecticidal thing that does not heel dismissal. sent17: something is a rat. sent18: the breadroot does forage cine-camera if it is a rent. sent19: that the breadroot does rent and it is Hasidic is wrong. sent20: something that is a Phragmipedium and does not heel dismissal is a dragoman. sent21: the dealer heels thiamine. sent22: the turnout does not heel dismissal if that it does forage afterdamp and it is insecticidal is not false. sent23: the chemosynthesis forages afterdamp. sent24: if the breadroot forages cine-camera the turnout forages afterdamp. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent6 -> int1: the dealer does border lunching and it heels thiamine.; int1 -> int2: the dealer borders lunching.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the breadroot is not a rent and is Hasidic is incorrect.; sent20 -> int4: if the turnout is a kind of a Phragmipedium and does not heel dismissal then it is a dragoman.; __UNKNOWN__