that the alliterator does not bumble and does not latch breechloader is wrong.
sent1: that something is non-postural a Romansh is false if it is not a kind of a lambrequin. sent2: if the woad is not a schnecken that it is a bighorn and it is not revocable is not correct. sent3: if the Boswell is not a lambrequin then the Galatians does not bumble. sent4: if the woad is not a kind of a Romansh then the Boswell is not a lambrequin. sent5: the jassid is non-postural if the woad is a Romansh and is revocable. sent6: the fact that the alliterator does bumble but it does not latch breechloader does not hold. sent7: something is not a bighorn and it is not a fistfight. sent8: that something does not bumble and does not latch breechloader is not false if it is not a schnecken. sent9: if the alliterator is not a kind of a schnecken it bumbles and does not latch breechloader. sent10: if the woad is a kind of a schnecken then it is revocable. sent11: if something that is not a kind of a bighorn does not fistfight then the jassid is not a tenoroon. sent12: if something discountenances saying but it is not arborical it is postural. sent13: the woad is a kind of a schnecken. sent14: the jassid is not a bighorn. sent15: something discountenances saying and is not arborical if it is not a tenoroon. sent16: the fact that the alliterator does not bumble and is a Romansh is wrong.
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the woad is revocable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the woad is a kind of a Romansh.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the woad is Romansh thing that is revocable.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the jassid is not postural.; sent12 -> int4: the jassid is postural if it discountenances saying and is not arborical.; sent15 -> int5: if the jassid is not a tenoroon then it does discountenance saying and is not arborical.; sent7 & sent11 -> int6: the jassid is not a tenoroon.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the jassid does discountenance saying and is not arborical.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the jassid is postural.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the woad is non-Romansh.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the Boswell is not a lambrequin.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the Galatians does not bumble.;
the serratus is not a bighorn.
sent1 -> int13: that the jassid is not postural but it is a Romansh is not correct if it is not a lambrequin.;
$hypothesis$ = that the alliterator does not bumble and does not latch breechloader is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is non-postural a Romansh is false if it is not a kind of a lambrequin. sent2: if the woad is not a schnecken that it is a bighorn and it is not revocable is not correct. sent3: if the Boswell is not a lambrequin then the Galatians does not bumble. sent4: if the woad is not a kind of a Romansh then the Boswell is not a lambrequin. sent5: the jassid is non-postural if the woad is a Romansh and is revocable. sent6: the fact that the alliterator does bumble but it does not latch breechloader does not hold. sent7: something is not a bighorn and it is not a fistfight. sent8: that something does not bumble and does not latch breechloader is not false if it is not a schnecken. sent9: if the alliterator is not a kind of a schnecken it bumbles and does not latch breechloader. sent10: if the woad is a kind of a schnecken then it is revocable. sent11: if something that is not a kind of a bighorn does not fistfight then the jassid is not a tenoroon. sent12: if something discountenances saying but it is not arborical it is postural. sent13: the woad is a kind of a schnecken. sent14: the jassid is not a bighorn. sent15: something discountenances saying and is not arborical if it is not a tenoroon. sent16: the fact that the alliterator does not bumble and is a Romansh is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the woad is revocable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the woad is a kind of a Romansh.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the woad is Romansh thing that is revocable.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the jassid is not postural.; sent12 -> int4: the jassid is postural if it discountenances saying and is not arborical.; sent15 -> int5: if the jassid is not a tenoroon then it does discountenance saying and is not arborical.; sent7 & sent11 -> int6: the jassid is not a tenoroon.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the jassid does discountenance saying and is not arborical.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the jassid is postural.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the woad is non-Romansh.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the Boswell is not a lambrequin.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the Galatians does not bumble.; __UNKNOWN__