the cooing stinginess does not occur.
sent1: if the onomasticness happens the fact that the cooing stinginess does not occur is correct. sent2: the non-archducalness causes that the smell does not occur and the ribbing stint does not occur. sent3: if the continuance does not occur and the ribbing rurality does not occur then the riposting occurs. sent4: the fact that the balminess and the self-flagellation happens is true. sent5: that the frictionlessness but not the afloatness occurs is caused by the riposting. sent6: the conjunction does not occur if that either the ribbing epsilon or the prodigy or both happens is true. sent7: that the belching does not occur but the snap happens is not right if the repeatableness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the repeatableness does not occur is not incorrect if that the repeatableness and the reassurance happens is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the belching does not occur but the snap happens is wrong the upholding does not occur. sent10: if the ribbing stint does not occur the continuance does not occur and the ribbing rurality does not occur. sent11: the fact that the repeatableness occurs and the reassurance occurs is wrong if the fact that the agroundness does not occur is true. sent12: the cooing stinginess is prevented by that the onomasticness happens or the balminess occurs or both. sent13: the fact that that both the cooing stinginess and the balminess happens is caused by that the self-flagellation does not occur hold. sent14: that the upholding does not occur results in the non-onomasticness and/or that the stunner does not occur. sent15: the self-flagellation happens. sent16: that both the frictionlessness and the non-afloatness happens causes that the cooing dammar does not occur. sent17: if the cooing dammar does not occur then the combustion happens and the agroundness does not occur.
sent4 -> int1: the balminess occurs.; int1 -> int2: the onomasticness happens and/or the balminess happens.; int2 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the cooing stinginess happens.
$hypothesis$ = the cooing stinginess does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the onomasticness happens the fact that the cooing stinginess does not occur is correct. sent2: the non-archducalness causes that the smell does not occur and the ribbing stint does not occur. sent3: if the continuance does not occur and the ribbing rurality does not occur then the riposting occurs. sent4: the fact that the balminess and the self-flagellation happens is true. sent5: that the frictionlessness but not the afloatness occurs is caused by the riposting. sent6: the conjunction does not occur if that either the ribbing epsilon or the prodigy or both happens is true. sent7: that the belching does not occur but the snap happens is not right if the repeatableness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the repeatableness does not occur is not incorrect if that the repeatableness and the reassurance happens is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the belching does not occur but the snap happens is wrong the upholding does not occur. sent10: if the ribbing stint does not occur the continuance does not occur and the ribbing rurality does not occur. sent11: the fact that the repeatableness occurs and the reassurance occurs is wrong if the fact that the agroundness does not occur is true. sent12: the cooing stinginess is prevented by that the onomasticness happens or the balminess occurs or both. sent13: the fact that that both the cooing stinginess and the balminess happens is caused by that the self-flagellation does not occur hold. sent14: that the upholding does not occur results in the non-onomasticness and/or that the stunner does not occur. sent15: the self-flagellation happens. sent16: that both the frictionlessness and the non-afloatness happens causes that the cooing dammar does not occur. sent17: if the cooing dammar does not occur then the combustion happens and the agroundness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the balminess occurs.; int1 -> int2: the onomasticness happens and/or the balminess happens.; int2 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__