that the fact that the self-help does not occur and the hungriness does not occur is wrong is true if the unbosoming does not occur.
sent1: if both the giveaway and the unbosoming happens the fact that the incontestableness does not occur is correct. sent2: the fact that the self-help does not occur and the hungriness does not occur is false if the debarkation does not occur. sent3: the debarkation does not occur if the giveaway does not occur. sent4: that the repenting but not the stillness happens is false if the treadmill happens. sent5: the giveaway does not occur if that the sterilizing washwoman happens and the gravel occurs does not hold. sent6: the giveaway and the hungriness happens if the assisting does not occur. sent7: if that the unbosoming happens does not hold the fact that both the sterilizing washwoman and the gravel happens is not right. sent8: the self-help does not occur if the fact that the indirection does not occur and the chemosurgery happens is not right. sent9: if the fact that the repenting but not the stilling happens is not right then the assisting does not occur. sent10: the congruousness does not occur if the caroming does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unbosoming does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that both the sterilizing washwoman and the gravel happens does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the giveaway does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the debarkation does not occur.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the self-help does not occur and the hungriness does not occur is incorrect.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the incontestableness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the self-help does not occur and the hungriness does not occur is wrong is true if the unbosoming does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if both the giveaway and the unbosoming happens the fact that the incontestableness does not occur is correct. sent2: the fact that the self-help does not occur and the hungriness does not occur is false if the debarkation does not occur. sent3: the debarkation does not occur if the giveaway does not occur. sent4: that the repenting but not the stillness happens is false if the treadmill happens. sent5: the giveaway does not occur if that the sterilizing washwoman happens and the gravel occurs does not hold. sent6: the giveaway and the hungriness happens if the assisting does not occur. sent7: if that the unbosoming happens does not hold the fact that both the sterilizing washwoman and the gravel happens is not right. sent8: the self-help does not occur if the fact that the indirection does not occur and the chemosurgery happens is not right. sent9: if the fact that the repenting but not the stilling happens is not right then the assisting does not occur. sent10: the congruousness does not occur if the caroming does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unbosoming does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that both the sterilizing washwoman and the gravel happens does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the giveaway does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the debarkation does not occur.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the self-help does not occur and the hungriness does not occur is incorrect.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__