that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Sango and it does not appoint is false then it is a Lophophora is not right.
sent1: the fissiparity is seminal if the fact that it is not a Sango and it does not contribute azurite does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the fissiparity is non-obligational thing that does not sensitize dosimetry is not right then it contributes outfitted. sent3: the fissiparity is a Lophophora if it is a kind of a Sango. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-seminal but not a worthlessness does not hold it is antiadrenergic. sent5: the fact that the fissiparity is a kind of a Lophophora is correct if that it is not a Sango and it does not appoint is not right. sent6: the gill is a subtopia if the fact that it is not a Lophophora and it is not placable is wrong. sent7: the fact that the fissiparity contributes cleaners is not false if that it is not a kind of a Sango and does not japan porringer is not right. sent8: the puku is a recommendation if the fact that it does not japan supersedure and it is not a Lophophora is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is both not a going and not antiadrenergic is false then it does contribute refit. sent10: the episcopate fumes if the fact that it is not an advancement and not antonymous is not right. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Sango that does not appoint is not right then it is a Lophophora. sent12: if that something is not a scat and not a Lophophora is incorrect then it is surfacing. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it does appoint hold it is a Lophophora. sent14: if the fissiparity is not a Sango and it does not appoint it is a Lophophora. sent15: there is something such that if it is a Sango it is a Lophophora. sent16: there is something such that if that it is not a Sango and it does appoint is wrong it is a Lophophora. sent17: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a Sango and it does not appoint it is a Lophophora is not false. sent18: if the fact that the fissiparity is not a kind of a Sango and does appoint does not hold then it is a Lophophora. sent19: there exists something such that if that it is not a eparchy and is not meridional is incorrect it japans tongue.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the floret is a kind of a surfacing if that it is not a scat and not a Lophophora is not correct.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Sango and it does not appoint is false then it is a Lophophora is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fissiparity is seminal if the fact that it is not a Sango and it does not contribute azurite does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the fissiparity is non-obligational thing that does not sensitize dosimetry is not right then it contributes outfitted. sent3: the fissiparity is a Lophophora if it is a kind of a Sango. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-seminal but not a worthlessness does not hold it is antiadrenergic. sent5: the fact that the fissiparity is a kind of a Lophophora is correct if that it is not a Sango and it does not appoint is not right. sent6: the gill is a subtopia if the fact that it is not a Lophophora and it is not placable is wrong. sent7: the fact that the fissiparity contributes cleaners is not false if that it is not a kind of a Sango and does not japan porringer is not right. sent8: the puku is a recommendation if the fact that it does not japan supersedure and it is not a Lophophora is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is both not a going and not antiadrenergic is false then it does contribute refit. sent10: the episcopate fumes if the fact that it is not an advancement and not antonymous is not right. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Sango that does not appoint is not right then it is a Lophophora. sent12: if that something is not a scat and not a Lophophora is incorrect then it is surfacing. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it does appoint hold it is a Lophophora. sent14: if the fissiparity is not a Sango and it does not appoint it is a Lophophora. sent15: there is something such that if it is a Sango it is a Lophophora. sent16: there is something such that if that it is not a Sango and it does appoint is wrong it is a Lophophora. sent17: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a Sango and it does not appoint it is a Lophophora is not false. sent18: if the fact that the fissiparity is not a kind of a Sango and does appoint does not hold then it is a Lophophora. sent19: there exists something such that if that it is not a eparchy and is not meridional is incorrect it japans tongue. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__