the appendix is a numbers.
sent1: if that the appendix is not dietary is not wrong then the tiramisu does suffer perpetrator and is a Burhinus. sent2: the appendix does not suffer perpetrator but it is a numbers if it is dietary. sent3: if that the manure is a kind of a dietary is true the appendix is not dietary. sent4: something is not dietary if that it is a dietary and it is not a numbers does not hold. sent5: if something is not a deathtrap then that it is dietary but not a numbers is not right. sent6: if something is not adenoidal then that it is a kind of a supernatural that is a kind of a deathtrap is not correct. sent7: something is not a kind of a deathtrap if that it is a kind of supernatural thing that is a deathtrap does not hold. sent8: the ectoproct suffers perpetrator and it is a dietary. sent9: if something that does suffer perpetrator is a dietary then the appendix is not a kind of a numbers.
sent8 -> int1: there exists something such that it does suffer perpetrator and is a dietary.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the tiramisu suffers perpetrator and is a Burhinus.
sent4 -> int2: that the appendix is not a dietary is correct if that it is both a dietary and not a numbers is not true.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the appendix is dietary and not a numbers is not correct if it is not a deathtrap.; sent7 -> int4: if the fact that the appendix is a kind of a supernatural and it is a deathtrap does not hold it is not a deathtrap.; sent6 -> int5: if the appendix is not adenoidal that it is a supernatural and it is a kind of a deathtrap is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the appendix is a numbers. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the appendix is not dietary is not wrong then the tiramisu does suffer perpetrator and is a Burhinus. sent2: the appendix does not suffer perpetrator but it is a numbers if it is dietary. sent3: if that the manure is a kind of a dietary is true the appendix is not dietary. sent4: something is not dietary if that it is a dietary and it is not a numbers does not hold. sent5: if something is not a deathtrap then that it is dietary but not a numbers is not right. sent6: if something is not adenoidal then that it is a kind of a supernatural that is a kind of a deathtrap is not correct. sent7: something is not a kind of a deathtrap if that it is a kind of supernatural thing that is a deathtrap does not hold. sent8: the ectoproct suffers perpetrator and it is a dietary. sent9: if something that does suffer perpetrator is a dietary then the appendix is not a kind of a numbers. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: there exists something such that it does suffer perpetrator and is a dietary.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__