the decomposition does not curse.
sent1: the fact that the downcast is Himalayan and is distinguishable does not hold. sent2: the decomposition is a ritual. sent3: the fact that the decomposition is a curse and is not non-ritual is not wrong if the downcast does not dive Sarajevo. sent4: there exists something such that it is tertian. sent5: something is distinguishable. sent6: the decomposition is a kind of a ritual if the downcast does not dive Sarajevo. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is distinguishable is not false that the downcast is both Himalayan and not distinguishable is wrong. sent8: something does not dive Sarajevo if the fact that it is Himalayan and not distinguishable is incorrect. sent9: if there exists something such that it is distinguishable that the downcast is Himalayan and it is distinguishable is not true.
sent8 -> int1: if that the downcast is Himalayan but it is not distinguishable is wrong then it does not dive Sarajevo.; sent5 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the downcast is not non-Himalayan and not distinguishable is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the downcast does not dive Sarajevo.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the decomposition is a curse and it is ritual.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the decomposition does not curse. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the downcast is Himalayan and is distinguishable does not hold. sent2: the decomposition is a ritual. sent3: the fact that the decomposition is a curse and is not non-ritual is not wrong if the downcast does not dive Sarajevo. sent4: there exists something such that it is tertian. sent5: something is distinguishable. sent6: the decomposition is a kind of a ritual if the downcast does not dive Sarajevo. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is distinguishable is not false that the downcast is both Himalayan and not distinguishable is wrong. sent8: something does not dive Sarajevo if the fact that it is Himalayan and not distinguishable is incorrect. sent9: if there exists something such that it is distinguishable that the downcast is Himalayan and it is distinguishable is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if that the downcast is Himalayan but it is not distinguishable is wrong then it does not dive Sarajevo.; sent5 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the downcast is not non-Himalayan and not distinguishable is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the downcast does not dive Sarajevo.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the decomposition is a curse and it is ritual.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__