the fact that there is something such that if it does unify it is a kind of a Dayan is incorrect.
sent1: if the rat is not a back but it is auxetic that the bitumastic is auxetic is correct. sent2: if the bitumastic does unify then it does not snuff figured. sent3: the greenfly grimaces. sent4: the bitumastic does not snuff figured. sent5: the bitumastic is a Maoist. sent6: if something does unify then that it does not snuff figured and is a Dayan is not incorrect. sent7: if something unifies it is not a back and it is auxetic. sent8: if something is not a kind of a portiere it unifies and it is a foreshock. sent9: the rat is not a kind of a portiere if the fact that the Marine does not patronize Adriatic but it is a Cimicidae is not true. sent10: if something does unify it does not snuff figured. sent11: the fact that the Marine does not patronize Adriatic but it is a Cimicidae is false if the pussy-paw does not patronize Tchaikovsky. sent12: the bitumastic is a kind of a ratel. sent13: that the bitumastic is not nonfissionable but it does pioneer is correct if it patronizes animist.
sent6 -> int1: if the bitumastic does unify it does not snuff figured and is a kind of a Dayan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bitumastic unifies.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bitumastic does not snuff figured but it is a Dayan.; int2 -> int3: the bitumastic is a Dayan.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the bitumastic does unify then that it is a Dayan is not wrong.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the bitumastic is auxetic.
sent7 -> int5: the rat does not back and is auxetic if it does unify.; sent8 -> int6: the rat unifies and is a kind of a foreshock if it is not a portiere.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does unify it is a kind of a Dayan is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rat is not a back but it is auxetic that the bitumastic is auxetic is correct. sent2: if the bitumastic does unify then it does not snuff figured. sent3: the greenfly grimaces. sent4: the bitumastic does not snuff figured. sent5: the bitumastic is a Maoist. sent6: if something does unify then that it does not snuff figured and is a Dayan is not incorrect. sent7: if something unifies it is not a back and it is auxetic. sent8: if something is not a kind of a portiere it unifies and it is a foreshock. sent9: the rat is not a kind of a portiere if the fact that the Marine does not patronize Adriatic but it is a Cimicidae is not true. sent10: if something does unify it does not snuff figured. sent11: the fact that the Marine does not patronize Adriatic but it is a Cimicidae is false if the pussy-paw does not patronize Tchaikovsky. sent12: the bitumastic is a kind of a ratel. sent13: that the bitumastic is not nonfissionable but it does pioneer is correct if it patronizes animist. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the bitumastic does unify it does not snuff figured and is a kind of a Dayan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bitumastic unifies.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bitumastic does not snuff figured but it is a Dayan.; int2 -> int3: the bitumastic is a Dayan.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the bitumastic does unify then that it is a Dayan is not wrong.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__