that the rowing happens and the incomprehensibleness occurs is not true.
sent1: the rowing happens if the fact that the hyperbolicness but not the rowing occurs is wrong. sent2: that the manhandling Oenothera occurs is not incorrect. sent3: the paw happens if the manhandling onrush does not occur and the peregrination happens. sent4: that the hyperbolicness happens and the row does not occur is wrong if the affinedness happens. sent5: the fact that the manhandling Odessa does not occur is right. sent6: the acrophony does not occur. sent7: the adding standardization happens if not the tirade but the dulling happens. sent8: if the acrophony does not occur then the manhandling Odessa does not occur and the digitalization does not occur. sent9: that both the hyperbolicness and the rowing occurs does not hold if the affinedness occurs. sent10: if the manhandling Odessa does not occur and the digitalization does not occur then the fact that the incomprehensibleness occurs is correct. sent11: if the manhandling Odessa happens but the digitalization does not occur the fact that the incomprehensibleness happens hold. sent12: the poker does not occur. sent13: the adding holism happens if the fact that not the tirade but the draw occurs is not wrong. sent14: the manhandling Odessa does not occur if the acrophony does not occur. sent15: the Peloponnesianness happens and the paw occurs. sent16: the affinedness occurs. sent17: that the hyperbolicness and the rowing happens is not correct.
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the manhandling Odessa does not occur and the digitalization does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the incomprehensibleness occurs.; sent4 & sent16 -> int3: the fact that the hyperbolicness but not the row occurs is not correct.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the row happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the row and the incomprehensibleness happens is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the rowing happens and the incomprehensibleness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the rowing happens if the fact that the hyperbolicness but not the rowing occurs is wrong. sent2: that the manhandling Oenothera occurs is not incorrect. sent3: the paw happens if the manhandling onrush does not occur and the peregrination happens. sent4: that the hyperbolicness happens and the row does not occur is wrong if the affinedness happens. sent5: the fact that the manhandling Odessa does not occur is right. sent6: the acrophony does not occur. sent7: the adding standardization happens if not the tirade but the dulling happens. sent8: if the acrophony does not occur then the manhandling Odessa does not occur and the digitalization does not occur. sent9: that both the hyperbolicness and the rowing occurs does not hold if the affinedness occurs. sent10: if the manhandling Odessa does not occur and the digitalization does not occur then the fact that the incomprehensibleness occurs is correct. sent11: if the manhandling Odessa happens but the digitalization does not occur the fact that the incomprehensibleness happens hold. sent12: the poker does not occur. sent13: the adding holism happens if the fact that not the tirade but the draw occurs is not wrong. sent14: the manhandling Odessa does not occur if the acrophony does not occur. sent15: the Peloponnesianness happens and the paw occurs. sent16: the affinedness occurs. sent17: that the hyperbolicness and the rowing happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the manhandling Odessa does not occur and the digitalization does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the incomprehensibleness occurs.; sent4 & sent16 -> int3: the fact that the hyperbolicness but not the row occurs is not correct.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the row happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__