the fact that either the individualist is a halloo or it is a electroencephalograph or both does not hold.
sent1: if the individualist does not measure bridesmaid the shadflower does not empty. sent2: if the shadflower is non-emptying and it does not measure bridesmaid the Rhabdoviridae is not a kind of a speechwriter. sent3: the Rhabdoviridae darts inion. sent4: the Rhabdoviridae does not dart beating if the individualist is a halloo that is not a speechwriter. sent5: the Rhabdoviridae is not a speechwriter and it does not deliquesce if the individualist does not deliquesce. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an emptying and it does not deliquesce is false the shadflower is emptying. sent7: the shadflower is non-emptying thing that does not measure bridesmaid if the individualist does not measure bridesmaid. sent8: if something is a kind of a speechwriter then the fact that it is an emptying and it does not deliquesce is wrong. sent9: if that something does not measure bridesmaid but it darts beating is wrong it is a kind of a electroencephalograph. sent10: the individualist is not an emptying. sent11: if the individualist does dart beating and/or it is not a kind of a halloo then it dart beating. sent12: the individualist is a speechwriter and a fishhook. sent13: the Rhabdoviridae darts inion and it deliquesces. sent14: if the shadflower does not measure bridesmaid then that the individualist is a halloo or it is a electroencephalograph or both does not hold. sent15: something that does deliquesce is a speechwriter. sent16: if the shadflower is a electroencephalograph then the individualist either darts beating or is not a halloo or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the individualist does not measure bridesmaid and does dart beating.; assump1 -> int1: the individualist does not measure bridesmaid.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the shadflower is a kind of non-emptying thing that does not measure bridesmaid.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Rhabdoviridae is not a speechwriter.; sent15 -> int4: the Rhabdoviridae is a speechwriter if it does deliquesce.; sent13 -> int5: the fact that the Rhabdoviridae deliquesces is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Rhabdoviridae is a kind of a speechwriter.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the individualist does not measure bridesmaid but it darts beating is incorrect.; sent9 -> int9: if the fact that the fact that the individualist does not measure bridesmaid but it darts beating does not hold is not false then it is a electroencephalograph.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the individualist is a kind of a electroencephalograph.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the individualist halloos and/or it is a electroencephalograph does not hold.
sent8 -> int11: if the fact that the defile is a speechwriter is correct the fact that it empties and it does not deliquesce does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the individualist is a halloo or it is a electroencephalograph or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the individualist does not measure bridesmaid the shadflower does not empty. sent2: if the shadflower is non-emptying and it does not measure bridesmaid the Rhabdoviridae is not a kind of a speechwriter. sent3: the Rhabdoviridae darts inion. sent4: the Rhabdoviridae does not dart beating if the individualist is a halloo that is not a speechwriter. sent5: the Rhabdoviridae is not a speechwriter and it does not deliquesce if the individualist does not deliquesce. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an emptying and it does not deliquesce is false the shadflower is emptying. sent7: the shadflower is non-emptying thing that does not measure bridesmaid if the individualist does not measure bridesmaid. sent8: if something is a kind of a speechwriter then the fact that it is an emptying and it does not deliquesce is wrong. sent9: if that something does not measure bridesmaid but it darts beating is wrong it is a kind of a electroencephalograph. sent10: the individualist is not an emptying. sent11: if the individualist does dart beating and/or it is not a kind of a halloo then it dart beating. sent12: the individualist is a speechwriter and a fishhook. sent13: the Rhabdoviridae darts inion and it deliquesces. sent14: if the shadflower does not measure bridesmaid then that the individualist is a halloo or it is a electroencephalograph or both does not hold. sent15: something that does deliquesce is a speechwriter. sent16: if the shadflower is a electroencephalograph then the individualist either darts beating or is not a halloo or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the individualist does not measure bridesmaid and does dart beating.; assump1 -> int1: the individualist does not measure bridesmaid.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the shadflower is a kind of non-emptying thing that does not measure bridesmaid.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Rhabdoviridae is not a speechwriter.; sent15 -> int4: the Rhabdoviridae is a speechwriter if it does deliquesce.; sent13 -> int5: the fact that the Rhabdoviridae deliquesces is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Rhabdoviridae is a kind of a speechwriter.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the individualist does not measure bridesmaid but it darts beating is incorrect.; sent9 -> int9: if the fact that the fact that the individualist does not measure bridesmaid but it darts beating does not hold is not false then it is a electroencephalograph.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the individualist is a kind of a electroencephalograph.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__