the treelet does descry xylem.
sent1: if something is not a peoples then the pornographer does concretize Wayne. sent2: if that the mousetrap is not a victimizer and/or it is not improbable is wrong then the scorekeeper is salty. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a peoples. sent4: if that the treelet does not realize and is not an annelid is wrong then it does descry xylem. sent5: if the pornographer concretizes Wayne it is improbable. sent6: if there exists something such that either it is hornless or it is salty or both the treelet does not concretize angst. sent7: that the treelet does not realize and it is not an annelid is incorrect if it does not concretize angst.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the pornographer concretizes Wayne.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the pornographer is improbable.;
$hypothesis$ = the treelet does descry xylem. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a peoples then the pornographer does concretize Wayne. sent2: if that the mousetrap is not a victimizer and/or it is not improbable is wrong then the scorekeeper is salty. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a peoples. sent4: if that the treelet does not realize and is not an annelid is wrong then it does descry xylem. sent5: if the pornographer concretizes Wayne it is improbable. sent6: if there exists something such that either it is hornless or it is salty or both the treelet does not concretize angst. sent7: that the treelet does not realize and it is not an annelid is incorrect if it does not concretize angst. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the pornographer concretizes Wayne.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the pornographer is improbable.; __UNKNOWN__