the becket does spirit if that the croissant is bucolic is right.
sent1: the croissant does reissue serendipity if it is bucolic. sent2: if that something does not consternate fryer is not incorrect it consternates hand and catches. sent3: something that is bucolic is a barbell. sent4: the croissant reissues serendipity or is not a spirit or both if the becket is a kind of a catch. sent5: the radio spirits. sent6: the becket does spirit if the croissant does reissue serendipity. sent7: that if there is something such that it is a Payena the fact that the becket consternates Nyiragongo but it is not a pouch is wrong is not wrong. sent8: the sapodilla does not reissue cross-link. sent9: the fact that the sapodilla reissues tool and is not capitalistic is wrong if it does not reissue cross-link. sent10: if there exists something such that it reissues serendipity or it is not a spirit or both the smith is bucolic. sent11: something is a Payena if that it reissues tool and is not capitalistic is incorrect. sent12: if the fact that something does consternate Nyiragongo but it is not a kind of a pouch is not true then it does not consternate fryer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the croissant is bucolic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the croissant reissues serendipity hold.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the becket is a kind of a spirit.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
if the serendipity is bucolic then it is a barbell.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the becket does spirit if that the croissant is bucolic is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the croissant does reissue serendipity if it is bucolic. sent2: if that something does not consternate fryer is not incorrect it consternates hand and catches. sent3: something that is bucolic is a barbell. sent4: the croissant reissues serendipity or is not a spirit or both if the becket is a kind of a catch. sent5: the radio spirits. sent6: the becket does spirit if the croissant does reissue serendipity. sent7: that if there is something such that it is a Payena the fact that the becket consternates Nyiragongo but it is not a pouch is wrong is not wrong. sent8: the sapodilla does not reissue cross-link. sent9: the fact that the sapodilla reissues tool and is not capitalistic is wrong if it does not reissue cross-link. sent10: if there exists something such that it reissues serendipity or it is not a spirit or both the smith is bucolic. sent11: something is a Payena if that it reissues tool and is not capitalistic is incorrect. sent12: if the fact that something does consternate Nyiragongo but it is not a kind of a pouch is not true then it does not consternate fryer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the croissant is bucolic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the croissant reissues serendipity hold.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the becket is a kind of a spirit.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__