the decalcification is scotomatous.
sent1: everything clanks breakax and is unseasonable. sent2: the decalcification is a spiritualism if the grocery is not a kind of a spiritualism. sent3: the decalcification does stone hypnagogue and is a spiritualism if the grocery is not a spiritualism. sent4: that the snare is not unseasonable and it does not crook MANPAD is wrong. sent5: there is something such that it is not non-biquadratic. sent6: everything is unseasonable. sent7: something does ammoniate brigade if it is a kind of a biquadratic. sent8: the grocery is not a spiritualism if the snare does ammoniate brigade. sent9: if the fact that the snare is not a kind of a dogma and does not crook MANPAD is not right then it is not non-biquadratic. sent10: that the snare is not a kind of a dogma and it does not crook MANPAD is incorrect. sent11: that the snare is not a dogma but it does crook MANPAD is not true. sent12: something does ammoniate snare if the fact that it is a spiritualism and does not ammoniate snare does not hold. sent13: if the decalcification is biquadratic the snare is not a spiritualism. sent14: the decalcification is a spiritualism. sent15: the grocery crooks knock if it is biquadratic. sent16: something is not scotomatous if it does stone hypnagogue and does clank breakax. sent17: the callus does ammoniate brigade. sent18: if something does not ammoniate brigade the fact that it is a kind of non-biquadratic thing that is not scotomatous is wrong. sent19: the decalcification is unseasonable. sent20: that the snare is a kind of a dogma and does not crook MANPAD is false.
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the snare is a biquadratic.; sent7 -> int2: the snare does ammoniate brigade if it is biquadratic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snare ammoniates brigade.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the grocery is not a spiritualism.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the decalcification does stone hypnagogue and is a kind of a spiritualism.; int5 -> int6: the decalcification stones hypnagogue.; sent1 -> int7: the decalcification clanks breakax and is unseasonable.; int7 -> int8: the decalcification does clank breakax.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the decalcification stones hypnagogue and it clanks breakax hold.; sent16 -> int10: if the decalcification does stone hypnagogue and it clanks breakax then the fact that it is not scotomatous is correct.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the decalcification is not non-scotomatous hold.
sent18 -> int11: the fact that the snare is not a kind of a biquadratic and is not scotomatous does not hold if it does not ammoniate brigade.;
$hypothesis$ = the decalcification is scotomatous. ; $context$ = sent1: everything clanks breakax and is unseasonable. sent2: the decalcification is a spiritualism if the grocery is not a kind of a spiritualism. sent3: the decalcification does stone hypnagogue and is a spiritualism if the grocery is not a spiritualism. sent4: that the snare is not unseasonable and it does not crook MANPAD is wrong. sent5: there is something such that it is not non-biquadratic. sent6: everything is unseasonable. sent7: something does ammoniate brigade if it is a kind of a biquadratic. sent8: the grocery is not a spiritualism if the snare does ammoniate brigade. sent9: if the fact that the snare is not a kind of a dogma and does not crook MANPAD is not right then it is not non-biquadratic. sent10: that the snare is not a kind of a dogma and it does not crook MANPAD is incorrect. sent11: that the snare is not a dogma but it does crook MANPAD is not true. sent12: something does ammoniate snare if the fact that it is a spiritualism and does not ammoniate snare does not hold. sent13: if the decalcification is biquadratic the snare is not a spiritualism. sent14: the decalcification is a spiritualism. sent15: the grocery crooks knock if it is biquadratic. sent16: something is not scotomatous if it does stone hypnagogue and does clank breakax. sent17: the callus does ammoniate brigade. sent18: if something does not ammoniate brigade the fact that it is a kind of non-biquadratic thing that is not scotomatous is wrong. sent19: the decalcification is unseasonable. sent20: that the snare is a kind of a dogma and does not crook MANPAD is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the snare is a biquadratic.; sent7 -> int2: the snare does ammoniate brigade if it is biquadratic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snare ammoniates brigade.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the grocery is not a spiritualism.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the decalcification does stone hypnagogue and is a kind of a spiritualism.; int5 -> int6: the decalcification stones hypnagogue.; sent1 -> int7: the decalcification clanks breakax and is unseasonable.; int7 -> int8: the decalcification does clank breakax.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the decalcification stones hypnagogue and it clanks breakax hold.; sent16 -> int10: if the decalcification does stone hypnagogue and it clanks breakax then the fact that it is not scotomatous is correct.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__