the fact that the ductule is indestructible and it is a Montana is false.
sent1: if there is something such that that it is both a Micronor and not faceless does not hold the ductule does not shell. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a Micronor and is not a shell is not correct. sent3: the ductule is a Montana if the fact that the millpond is not uncharitable is not wrong. sent4: that the millpond is a kind of a Micronor and it does shell is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Montana that is faceless is not true. sent6: the fact that the fact that the ductule is indestructible and is a Montana is correct is wrong if it is not a shell. sent7: that the millpond is faceless thing that is not a Micronor is not right if there is something such that it is not a Montana. sent8: the fact that something is not a shell and it is not faceless does not hold if it is not a Montana. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Micronor and it is not a Montana is not right. sent10: there is something such that it is a Micronor and is not indestructible. sent11: the millpond is a kind of a Micronor if that that it is not a kind of a shell and it is not faceless hold is not right. sent12: the ductule does not shell if there exists something such that it is faceless. sent13: the fact that that something is a maltha that does unfold is not false does not hold if it is not uncharitable. sent14: if something is not uncharitable then that the millpond is a Micronor and is not faceless is not true. sent15: the ductule is indestructible. sent16: something is not a kind of a Montana if it is destructible or it is not a Montana or both. sent17: there exists something such that that it is both a Micronor and a Montana is incorrect.
that the ductule is indestructible and it is a Montana is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ductule is indestructible and it is a Montana is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is both a Micronor and not faceless does not hold the ductule does not shell. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a Micronor and is not a shell is not correct. sent3: the ductule is a Montana if the fact that the millpond is not uncharitable is not wrong. sent4: that the millpond is a kind of a Micronor and it does shell is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Montana that is faceless is not true. sent6: the fact that the fact that the ductule is indestructible and is a Montana is correct is wrong if it is not a shell. sent7: that the millpond is faceless thing that is not a Micronor is not right if there is something such that it is not a Montana. sent8: the fact that something is not a shell and it is not faceless does not hold if it is not a Montana. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Micronor and it is not a Montana is not right. sent10: there is something such that it is a Micronor and is not indestructible. sent11: the millpond is a kind of a Micronor if that that it is not a kind of a shell and it is not faceless hold is not right. sent12: the ductule does not shell if there exists something such that it is faceless. sent13: the fact that that something is a maltha that does unfold is not false does not hold if it is not uncharitable. sent14: if something is not uncharitable then that the millpond is a Micronor and is not faceless is not true. sent15: the ductule is indestructible. sent16: something is not a kind of a Montana if it is destructible or it is not a Montana or both. sent17: there exists something such that that it is both a Micronor and a Montana is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__