the bootleg does not dope.
sent1: if the fact that something does not impersonate syndicalism and does dope is not correct then that it is not a kind of a dope is not false. sent2: if something does not spiel bouillabaisse then it is a Polynemidae and is a kind of a bot. sent3: the grout is a shy and/or a curiosa if there exists something such that it is shy. sent4: the nelfinavir does impersonate syndicalism and it is a snowboard. sent5: the fact that the nelfinavir zigzags if the nelfinavir is a snowboard is correct. sent6: if the kingcup is smokeless then the Loestrin is a kind of a shy that is not a thriller. sent7: something is a zigzag or it does unwrap vow or both. sent8: the benedictine shies if that the grout is a shies is not false. sent9: the sprinkle dopes. sent10: the kingcup is smokeless and it is unrhythmical. sent11: the bootleg does not spiel bouillabaisse if the benedictine is shy. sent12: if something zigzags or does not unwrap vow or both the bootleg does dope. sent13: if that the nelfinavir is a kind of a dope that does not unwrap vow is not true then the dining-room does not zigzag. sent14: the nelfinavir impersonates syndicalism. sent15: the bootleg does recess. sent16: if the grout is a curiosa then the benedictine is a shy. sent17: the nelfinavir does zigzag and/or does unwrap vow. sent18: if there is something such that it does not unwrap vow the bootleg dopes. sent19: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a Polynemidae is correct then the fact that the nelfinavir is a dope but it does not unwrap vow does not hold.
sent4 -> int1: the nelfinavir does snowboard.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the nelfinavir is a zigzag.; int2 -> int3: the nelfinavir is a zigzag or does not unwrap vow or both.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does zigzag and/or it does not unwrap vow.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the bootleg is not a dope hold.
sent1 -> int5: if that the fact that the bootleg does not impersonate syndicalism and is a dope is false is true then it does not dope.;
$hypothesis$ = the bootleg does not dope. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not impersonate syndicalism and does dope is not correct then that it is not a kind of a dope is not false. sent2: if something does not spiel bouillabaisse then it is a Polynemidae and is a kind of a bot. sent3: the grout is a shy and/or a curiosa if there exists something such that it is shy. sent4: the nelfinavir does impersonate syndicalism and it is a snowboard. sent5: the fact that the nelfinavir zigzags if the nelfinavir is a snowboard is correct. sent6: if the kingcup is smokeless then the Loestrin is a kind of a shy that is not a thriller. sent7: something is a zigzag or it does unwrap vow or both. sent8: the benedictine shies if that the grout is a shies is not false. sent9: the sprinkle dopes. sent10: the kingcup is smokeless and it is unrhythmical. sent11: the bootleg does not spiel bouillabaisse if the benedictine is shy. sent12: if something zigzags or does not unwrap vow or both the bootleg does dope. sent13: if that the nelfinavir is a kind of a dope that does not unwrap vow is not true then the dining-room does not zigzag. sent14: the nelfinavir impersonates syndicalism. sent15: the bootleg does recess. sent16: if the grout is a curiosa then the benedictine is a shy. sent17: the nelfinavir does zigzag and/or does unwrap vow. sent18: if there is something such that it does not unwrap vow the bootleg dopes. sent19: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a Polynemidae is correct then the fact that the nelfinavir is a dope but it does not unwrap vow does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the nelfinavir does snowboard.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the nelfinavir is a zigzag.; int2 -> int3: the nelfinavir is a zigzag or does not unwrap vow or both.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does zigzag and/or it does not unwrap vow.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__