there is something such that if it is not a soman and accredits sepulcher it does not accredit eft.
sent1: something is not a precipice if it is congruous thing that is a wild. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a thinker and it does accredit dingo then it does not transfuse danaid. sent3: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a stump and it is a Aspidiotus then it does accredit dingo hold. sent4: something that is a kind of non-prostate thing that is a kind of a ideogram is unafraid. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not monaural and it is a Akkadian then it is a sunniness. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a soman and accredits sepulcher it does not accredit eft. sent7: the sepulcher does not accredit eft if it is a workstation and it is difficult. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Jakobson and is a antinomian it is wearable. sent9: if something that is not a soman does accredit sepulcher then that it does accredit eft is not false. sent10: something is not Alpine if it fills focus and does jiggle. sent11: if something that is not a kind of a dimwit is mithraic then it is not a kind of a Carapidae. sent12: there is something such that if it does not fill Charadriidae and logrolls then it does chip. sent13: if the danaid is a soman and it accredits sepulcher then it does not accredit eft. sent14: if something is a kind of unseductive thing that is a kind of a severalty then it is a workplace. sent15: if something is a kind of a soman and does accredit sepulcher that it does not accredit eft is not incorrect. sent16: the dingo is a kind of a tastebud if it is not a soman and it fills focus.
there exists something such that if it is both congruous and not non-wild then it is not a kind of a precipice.
sent1 -> int1: if the associate is not incongruous but it is a kind of a wild then it is not a precipice.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a soman and accredits sepulcher it does not accredit eft. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a precipice if it is congruous thing that is a wild. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a thinker and it does accredit dingo then it does not transfuse danaid. sent3: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a stump and it is a Aspidiotus then it does accredit dingo hold. sent4: something that is a kind of non-prostate thing that is a kind of a ideogram is unafraid. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not monaural and it is a Akkadian then it is a sunniness. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a soman and accredits sepulcher it does not accredit eft. sent7: the sepulcher does not accredit eft if it is a workstation and it is difficult. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Jakobson and is a antinomian it is wearable. sent9: if something that is not a soman does accredit sepulcher then that it does accredit eft is not false. sent10: something is not Alpine if it fills focus and does jiggle. sent11: if something that is not a kind of a dimwit is mithraic then it is not a kind of a Carapidae. sent12: there is something such that if it does not fill Charadriidae and logrolls then it does chip. sent13: if the danaid is a soman and it accredits sepulcher then it does not accredit eft. sent14: if something is a kind of unseductive thing that is a kind of a severalty then it is a workplace. sent15: if something is a kind of a soman and does accredit sepulcher that it does not accredit eft is not incorrect. sent16: the dingo is a kind of a tastebud if it is not a soman and it fills focus. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__