the cataphyll is gastroduodenal.
sent1: something does not coconspire. sent2: the fact that the narrow-body does hunger uplifting but it is non-trophotropic is not right if there exists something such that it is not guilty. sent3: something is not guilty. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does hunger uplifting and is not trophotropic does not hold the pixel does coconspire.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: that that the narrow-body hungers uplifting and is not trophotropic is not false is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that that it does hunger uplifting and it is non-trophotropic hold is false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the pixel does coconspire.;
$hypothesis$ = the cataphyll is gastroduodenal. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not coconspire. sent2: the fact that the narrow-body does hunger uplifting but it is non-trophotropic is not right if there exists something such that it is not guilty. sent3: something is not guilty. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does hunger uplifting and is not trophotropic does not hold the pixel does coconspire. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: that that the narrow-body hungers uplifting and is not trophotropic is not false is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that that it does hunger uplifting and it is non-trophotropic hold is false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the pixel does coconspire.; __UNKNOWN__