there is something such that if it is a Terrapene then it does outshout professionalization.
sent1: that the sanicle is incommutable and it is a kind of a Monario is not correct if it does not bear protest. sent2: if the sanicle does not outshout steamroller it does outshout professionalization. sent3: the sanicle is not a Terrapene if the fact that it is incommutable and is a Monario is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sanicle does not bear protest.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sanicle is both incommutable and a Monario does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the sanicle is not a kind of a Terrapene.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sanicle is a Terrapene.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the sanicle bears protest hold.; int4 -> int5: the sanicle does bear protest or does outshout banquet or both.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a Terrapene then it does outshout professionalization. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sanicle is incommutable and it is a kind of a Monario is not correct if it does not bear protest. sent2: if the sanicle does not outshout steamroller it does outshout professionalization. sent3: the sanicle is not a Terrapene if the fact that it is incommutable and is a Monario is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sanicle does not bear protest.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sanicle is both incommutable and a Monario does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the sanicle is not a kind of a Terrapene.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sanicle is a Terrapene.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the sanicle bears protest hold.; int4 -> int5: the sanicle does bear protest or does outshout banquet or both.; __UNKNOWN__