something does not blind receptiveness or it does not repot end-plate or both.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a wastebasket then it does not blind Scorpaenidae and is not a Scythia. sent2: if the tearaway is not a kind of a wastebasket then it does not blind Scorpaenidae. sent3: the Timothy is not a kind of a wastebasket if the caper does not fan. sent4: The webfoot does not lean tearaway. sent5: something is a kind of a Scythia if the fact that it does not lean Desmanthus and/or it does repot end-plate does not hold. sent6: the tearaway does not lean webfoot. sent7: either the fowler does not blind Scorpaenidae or it is not paniculate or both. sent8: the Timothy does not blind receptiveness or it does repot end-plate or both. sent9: something is exportable thing that incarnates if it is not temperamental. sent10: that the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae and is not a kind of a Scythia is not correct if the caper does not lean Desmanthus. sent11: either the Timothy blinds receptiveness or it does not repot end-plate or both. sent12: the Timothy is a kind of a exudate. sent13: if something is a Scythia then that the webfoot does not blind Scorpaenidae is correct. sent14: there is something such that it is not Anglo-catholic. sent15: the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae. sent16: the tearaway is not temperamental if there are non-Anglo-catholic things. sent17: something does not blind Scorpaenidae if it is not a kind of a wastebasket. sent18: the Timothy is not a kind of a wastebasket if the caper does not lean webfoot. sent19: the tearaway is not a wastebasket if the fact that it does not lean webfoot is not false. sent20: if something incarnates then it does not fan and/or does not lean webfoot. sent21: something either blinds receptiveness or does not repot end-plate or both. sent22: if the tearaway incarnates the caper incarnates. sent23: there exists something such that it does not blind receptiveness and/or does repot end-plate. sent24: the caper does not lean Desmanthus if the fact that the Timothy does not blind receptiveness but it is a exudate does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Timothy does not blind receptiveness and is a kind of a exudate does not hold.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the caper does not lean Desmanthus.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae and it is not a kind of a Scythia does not hold.; sent1 -> int3: the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae and is not a Scythia if it is not a wastebasket.; sent19 & sent6 -> int4: the tearaway is not a kind of a wastebasket.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae and it is not a kind of a Scythia.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Timothy does not blind receptiveness and is a kind of a exudate.; int7 -> int8: the Timothy does not blind receptiveness.; int8 -> int9: the Timothy does not blind receptiveness or does not repot end-plate or both.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the webfoot does not blind Scorpaenidae.
sent5 -> int10: if that the Timothy does not lean Desmanthus and/or it does repot end-plate does not hold then it is a Scythia.; sent20 -> int11: if the caper incarnates then it is not a kind of a fan and/or it does not lean webfoot.; sent9 -> int12: if the tearaway is not temperamental it is exportable thing that does incarnate.; sent14 & sent16 -> int13: the tearaway is not temperamental.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the tearaway is a kind of exportable thing that incarnates.; int14 -> int15: the tearaway does incarnate.; sent22 & int15 -> int16: the caper does incarnate.; int11 & int16 -> int17: the caper is not a fan or does not lean webfoot or both.; int17 & sent3 & sent18 -> int18: the fact that the Timothy is a kind of a wastebasket does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = something does not blind receptiveness or it does not repot end-plate or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a wastebasket then it does not blind Scorpaenidae and is not a Scythia. sent2: if the tearaway is not a kind of a wastebasket then it does not blind Scorpaenidae. sent3: the Timothy is not a kind of a wastebasket if the caper does not fan. sent4: The webfoot does not lean tearaway. sent5: something is a kind of a Scythia if the fact that it does not lean Desmanthus and/or it does repot end-plate does not hold. sent6: the tearaway does not lean webfoot. sent7: either the fowler does not blind Scorpaenidae or it is not paniculate or both. sent8: the Timothy does not blind receptiveness or it does repot end-plate or both. sent9: something is exportable thing that incarnates if it is not temperamental. sent10: that the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae and is not a kind of a Scythia is not correct if the caper does not lean Desmanthus. sent11: either the Timothy blinds receptiveness or it does not repot end-plate or both. sent12: the Timothy is a kind of a exudate. sent13: if something is a Scythia then that the webfoot does not blind Scorpaenidae is correct. sent14: there is something such that it is not Anglo-catholic. sent15: the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae. sent16: the tearaway is not temperamental if there are non-Anglo-catholic things. sent17: something does not blind Scorpaenidae if it is not a kind of a wastebasket. sent18: the Timothy is not a kind of a wastebasket if the caper does not lean webfoot. sent19: the tearaway is not a wastebasket if the fact that it does not lean webfoot is not false. sent20: if something incarnates then it does not fan and/or does not lean webfoot. sent21: something either blinds receptiveness or does not repot end-plate or both. sent22: if the tearaway incarnates the caper incarnates. sent23: there exists something such that it does not blind receptiveness and/or does repot end-plate. sent24: the caper does not lean Desmanthus if the fact that the Timothy does not blind receptiveness but it is a exudate does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Timothy does not blind receptiveness and is a kind of a exudate does not hold.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the caper does not lean Desmanthus.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae and it is not a kind of a Scythia does not hold.; sent1 -> int3: the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae and is not a Scythia if it is not a wastebasket.; sent19 & sent6 -> int4: the tearaway is not a kind of a wastebasket.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tearaway does not blind Scorpaenidae and it is not a kind of a Scythia.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Timothy does not blind receptiveness and is a kind of a exudate.; int7 -> int8: the Timothy does not blind receptiveness.; int8 -> int9: the Timothy does not blind receptiveness or does not repot end-plate or both.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__