something is not a kind of a jugular and is not incurious.
sent1: the iceman is a Midwest. sent2: the fomentation is a kind of a theism if that the iceman is a Midwest is not incorrect. sent3: something is not incurious if it is a theism. sent4: the fact that something is not a jugular and it is not incurious hold if that it is a theism hold. sent5: there exists something such that it is a jugular and it is not incurious. sent6: if that that the fomentation is not a jugular but it is a circumcision is incorrect hold then it is a jugular. sent7: if something is a theism it is not a Midwest. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a jugular is not wrong. sent9: the iceman is both not a Midwest and not jugular if it is incurious. sent10: the iceman does not caseate and it is not a forget-me-not if it is not a kind of a Midwest. sent11: the fomentation is not incurious.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the fomentation is a theism.; sent4 -> int2: if the fomentation is a theism then it is not a jugular and it is not incurious.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fomentation is both not jugular and not incurious.; int3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it does not caseate and it is not a forget-me-not.
sent7 -> int4: if the iceman is a kind of a theism it is not a kind of a Midwest.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not a kind of a jugular and is not incurious. ; $context$ = sent1: the iceman is a Midwest. sent2: the fomentation is a kind of a theism if that the iceman is a Midwest is not incorrect. sent3: something is not incurious if it is a theism. sent4: the fact that something is not a jugular and it is not incurious hold if that it is a theism hold. sent5: there exists something such that it is a jugular and it is not incurious. sent6: if that that the fomentation is not a jugular but it is a circumcision is incorrect hold then it is a jugular. sent7: if something is a theism it is not a Midwest. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a jugular is not wrong. sent9: the iceman is both not a Midwest and not jugular if it is incurious. sent10: the iceman does not caseate and it is not a forget-me-not if it is not a kind of a Midwest. sent11: the fomentation is not incurious. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the fomentation is a theism.; sent4 -> int2: if the fomentation is a theism then it is not a jugular and it is not incurious.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fomentation is both not jugular and not incurious.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__