there is something such that that it is not off-line and/or it is not a ELISA does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the upholder is either not nonlinear or not off-line or both is not true. sent2: that the hitter is not off-line and/or it is not a ELISA is not right if the ceftazidime is not a logwood. sent3: if that the ceftazidime does not copy ceftazidime hold that either the hitter is not a kind of a tap or it is not off-line or both is not true. sent4: the fact that the fact that either the drupelet is not a kind of a viscose or it is not ovoviviparous or both is incorrect is not wrong. sent5: the spendthrift is Javanese thing that does copy ceftazidime. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a tap and/or it dominates beehive is incorrect. sent7: that either the hitter does not tap or it is not a kind of a cane or both is wrong. sent8: something does not copy ceftazidime or is not off-line or both. sent9: if the spendthrift does copy ceftazidime and is photosynthetic then the drupelet is a gentrification. sent10: the fact that the spendthrift is not nonphotosynthetic if the fact that the spendthrift does not dominate beehive but it is ovoviviparous is not correct is not incorrect. sent11: the ceftazidime is not a logwood and it is not a tap if the drupelet is a gentrification. sent12: the hitter does tap. sent13: that the spendthrift does not dominate beehive but it is ovoviviparous is false. sent14: the fact that either the hitter is not a ELISA or it is not nonphotosynthetic or both does not hold. sent15: if the ceftazidime is a tap and does not dominate beehive that the spendthrift is off-line is right. sent16: there is something such that it is ovoviviparous.
sent5 -> int1: the spendthrift does copy ceftazidime.; sent10 & sent13 -> int2: the spendthrift is not nonphotosynthetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the spendthrift copies ceftazidime and is photosynthetic.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the drupelet is a kind of a gentrification.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the ceftazidime is not a logwood and is not a tap.; int5 -> int6: the ceftazidime is not a kind of a logwood.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: that the hitter is not off-line and/or it is not a kind of a ELISA does not hold.; int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that that it is not off-line and/or it is not a ELISA does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the upholder is either not nonlinear or not off-line or both is not true. sent2: that the hitter is not off-line and/or it is not a ELISA is not right if the ceftazidime is not a logwood. sent3: if that the ceftazidime does not copy ceftazidime hold that either the hitter is not a kind of a tap or it is not off-line or both is not true. sent4: the fact that the fact that either the drupelet is not a kind of a viscose or it is not ovoviviparous or both is incorrect is not wrong. sent5: the spendthrift is Javanese thing that does copy ceftazidime. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a tap and/or it dominates beehive is incorrect. sent7: that either the hitter does not tap or it is not a kind of a cane or both is wrong. sent8: something does not copy ceftazidime or is not off-line or both. sent9: if the spendthrift does copy ceftazidime and is photosynthetic then the drupelet is a gentrification. sent10: the fact that the spendthrift is not nonphotosynthetic if the fact that the spendthrift does not dominate beehive but it is ovoviviparous is not correct is not incorrect. sent11: the ceftazidime is not a logwood and it is not a tap if the drupelet is a gentrification. sent12: the hitter does tap. sent13: that the spendthrift does not dominate beehive but it is ovoviviparous is false. sent14: the fact that either the hitter is not a ELISA or it is not nonphotosynthetic or both does not hold. sent15: if the ceftazidime is a tap and does not dominate beehive that the spendthrift is off-line is right. sent16: there is something such that it is ovoviviparous. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the spendthrift does copy ceftazidime.; sent10 & sent13 -> int2: the spendthrift is not nonphotosynthetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the spendthrift copies ceftazidime and is photosynthetic.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the drupelet is a kind of a gentrification.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the ceftazidime is not a logwood and is not a tap.; int5 -> int6: the ceftazidime is not a kind of a logwood.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: that the hitter is not off-line and/or it is not a kind of a ELISA does not hold.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__