the void is not intelligible.
sent1: the rivulus is not intelligible if the duck is a stack. sent2: the hexane does rerun crayon if the fact that it is not a radiometer but a stack is not correct. sent3: the springer is not an acute if the rivulus is a kind of non-intelligible thing that does backlog. sent4: the hexane is unambitious if that either the genoise is not a gaiter or it is non-effortful or both is not correct. sent5: that something is not a gaiter and/or it is not effortful is incorrect if it is not a kind of a bustard. sent6: the genoise stacks. sent7: the hexane is not a bustard if that it does not rerun crayon or it is not a kind of a territorial or both is not right. sent8: the springer is effortful. sent9: that the hexane is not a radiometer but it is a stack is not true if it decorates. sent10: there is something such that it does stack. sent11: the fact that the rivulus is intelligible is not correct if the duck is a radiometer. sent12: that the fact that something is not Bantoid and/or it is not landless is not false does not hold if it is not a Haemodorum. sent13: if something is unambitious and it reruns crayon it is not a territorial. sent14: something is intelligible if it is a bustard. sent15: the fact that something does not rerun crayon and/or it is not a kind of a territorial is wrong if it is an acute. sent16: the hexane decorates. sent17: the fact that the fact that the void is not a kind of a territorial and does not rerun crayon is not incorrect does not hold if there exists something such that it is not an acute. sent18: that something is a kind of unintelligible thing that is not unambitious is not right if it is not a bustard. sent19: if the springer is not a backlog then the hexane is a kind of a territorial. sent20: if the springer is territorial then the fact that the hexane is non-unambitious thing that does rerun crayon is false. sent21: something that is effortful thing that is a gaiter is not acute. sent22: the length is not unambitious. sent23: everything does not backlog. sent24: if there exists something such that it does stack then either the duck stack or it is a radiometer or both. sent25: if something is not effortful then it decorates.
sent5 -> int1: if the genoise is not a bustard then the fact that it is either not a gaiter or not effortful or both does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genoise is not a bustard.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the genoise is not a gaiter and/or it is not effortful is not correct.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the hexane is unambitious.; sent9 & sent16 -> int4: the fact that the hexane is not a radiometer but it does stack is false.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the hexane does rerun crayon.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the hexane is unambitious and it reruns crayon.; sent13 -> int7: the hexane is not territorial if it is unambitious and it does rerun crayon.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the hexane is not a kind of a territorial.; sent23 -> int9: the springer is not a kind of a backlog.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the hexane is not nonterritorial.; int8 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the genoise is a bustard.; int12 -> int13: the genoise is not non-acute and/or is a kind of a bustard.;
the hexane is a kind of a Bruneian.
sent10 & sent24 -> int14: the duck is a stack or it is a radiometer or both.; int14 & sent1 & sent11 -> int15: the rivulus is not intelligible.;
$hypothesis$ = the void is not intelligible. ; $context$ = sent1: the rivulus is not intelligible if the duck is a stack. sent2: the hexane does rerun crayon if the fact that it is not a radiometer but a stack is not correct. sent3: the springer is not an acute if the rivulus is a kind of non-intelligible thing that does backlog. sent4: the hexane is unambitious if that either the genoise is not a gaiter or it is non-effortful or both is not correct. sent5: that something is not a gaiter and/or it is not effortful is incorrect if it is not a kind of a bustard. sent6: the genoise stacks. sent7: the hexane is not a bustard if that it does not rerun crayon or it is not a kind of a territorial or both is not right. sent8: the springer is effortful. sent9: that the hexane is not a radiometer but it is a stack is not true if it decorates. sent10: there is something such that it does stack. sent11: the fact that the rivulus is intelligible is not correct if the duck is a radiometer. sent12: that the fact that something is not Bantoid and/or it is not landless is not false does not hold if it is not a Haemodorum. sent13: if something is unambitious and it reruns crayon it is not a territorial. sent14: something is intelligible if it is a bustard. sent15: the fact that something does not rerun crayon and/or it is not a kind of a territorial is wrong if it is an acute. sent16: the hexane decorates. sent17: the fact that the fact that the void is not a kind of a territorial and does not rerun crayon is not incorrect does not hold if there exists something such that it is not an acute. sent18: that something is a kind of unintelligible thing that is not unambitious is not right if it is not a bustard. sent19: if the springer is not a backlog then the hexane is a kind of a territorial. sent20: if the springer is territorial then the fact that the hexane is non-unambitious thing that does rerun crayon is false. sent21: something that is effortful thing that is a gaiter is not acute. sent22: the length is not unambitious. sent23: everything does not backlog. sent24: if there exists something such that it does stack then either the duck stack or it is a radiometer or both. sent25: if something is not effortful then it decorates. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the genoise is not a bustard then the fact that it is either not a gaiter or not effortful or both does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genoise is not a bustard.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the genoise is not a gaiter and/or it is not effortful is not correct.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the hexane is unambitious.; sent9 & sent16 -> int4: the fact that the hexane is not a radiometer but it does stack is false.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the hexane does rerun crayon.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the hexane is unambitious and it reruns crayon.; sent13 -> int7: the hexane is not territorial if it is unambitious and it does rerun crayon.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the hexane is not a kind of a territorial.; sent23 -> int9: the springer is not a kind of a backlog.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the hexane is not nonterritorial.; int8 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the genoise is a bustard.; int12 -> int13: the genoise is not non-acute and/or is a kind of a bustard.; __UNKNOWN__