if the carob determines dumbbell then it does not stride.
sent1: the carob is calisthenics and it is maxi. sent2: the carob is not a kind of a maxi if it is a sapsago that does determine dumbbell. sent3: if the carob is a kind of a stride then it is a sapsago.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carob is a stride.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the carob is a kind of a sapsago.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the carob determines dumbbell is not wrong.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the carob is a sapsago and it determines dumbbell.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the carob is non-maxi.; sent1 -> int4: the carob is a maxi.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the carob is not a kind of a stride.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the carob determines dumbbell then it does not stride. ; $context$ = sent1: the carob is calisthenics and it is maxi. sent2: the carob is not a kind of a maxi if it is a sapsago that does determine dumbbell. sent3: if the carob is a kind of a stride then it is a sapsago. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carob is a stride.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the carob is a kind of a sapsago.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the carob determines dumbbell is not wrong.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the carob is a sapsago and it determines dumbbell.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the carob is non-maxi.; sent1 -> int4: the carob is a maxi.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the carob is not a kind of a stride.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__