that that the maladroitness and/or the non-incompetentness occurs is wrong if the malingering Western occurs does not hold.
sent1: the sentence does not occur. sent2: the dominant occurs. sent3: the sally does not occur. sent4: the consolidation occurs. sent5: the undressing pedicel happens. sent6: the undressing pedodontist happens. sent7: the maladroitness happens or the incompetent happens or both. sent8: the routine does not occur if either the laryngealness happens or the neuromuscularness does not occur or both. sent9: that not the synovialness but the malingering Formicarius occurs is caused by that the undressing pedicel does not occur. sent10: the incompetent does not occur. sent11: if that both the jackstraws and the malingering Western occurs is not right then the waxing does not occur. sent12: if the synovialness does not occur that that both the jackstraws and the malingering Western occurs is true is false. sent13: either that the maladroitness occurs or the competentness or both prevents the malingering Western. sent14: that either the intolerantness occurs or the transformation does not occur or both is not right. sent15: the copout occurs. sent16: the fact that the undressing rarebit or the non-Romanyness or both occurs is incorrect if the fetoscopy occurs. sent17: the endothermicness does not occur. sent18: if the endothermicness occurs the undressing Dirca happens or the wanning does not occur or both. sent19: the undressing pedicel does not occur if the fact that the undressing pedicel but not the undressing lumber happens is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the maladroitness happens and/or the incompetentness does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the malingering Western does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the malingering Western occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the maladroitness occurs and/or the incompetentness does not occur is not right.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the ecologicalness happens and/or the waxing does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that that the maladroitness and/or the non-incompetentness occurs is wrong if the malingering Western occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the sentence does not occur. sent2: the dominant occurs. sent3: the sally does not occur. sent4: the consolidation occurs. sent5: the undressing pedicel happens. sent6: the undressing pedodontist happens. sent7: the maladroitness happens or the incompetent happens or both. sent8: the routine does not occur if either the laryngealness happens or the neuromuscularness does not occur or both. sent9: that not the synovialness but the malingering Formicarius occurs is caused by that the undressing pedicel does not occur. sent10: the incompetent does not occur. sent11: if that both the jackstraws and the malingering Western occurs is not right then the waxing does not occur. sent12: if the synovialness does not occur that that both the jackstraws and the malingering Western occurs is true is false. sent13: either that the maladroitness occurs or the competentness or both prevents the malingering Western. sent14: that either the intolerantness occurs or the transformation does not occur or both is not right. sent15: the copout occurs. sent16: the fact that the undressing rarebit or the non-Romanyness or both occurs is incorrect if the fetoscopy occurs. sent17: the endothermicness does not occur. sent18: if the endothermicness occurs the undressing Dirca happens or the wanning does not occur or both. sent19: the undressing pedicel does not occur if the fact that the undressing pedicel but not the undressing lumber happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the maladroitness happens and/or the incompetentness does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the malingering Western does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the malingering Western occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the maladroitness occurs and/or the incompetentness does not occur is not right.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__