the fact that there is something such that if it is not an equine then that it is teratogenic and it variegates cadmium is not right is incorrect.
sent1: the great-niece is not obtuse. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a smoothie it is perceptual and it tallies. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not skydive then it does pit navy and is perceptual. sent4: if something is not hemodynamics then that it is teratogenic and it variegates cadmium does not hold. sent5: the bunchgrass does not variegate infructescence. sent6: the bunchgrass is a fable and it is a kind of a corduroy. sent7: the bunchgrass is not teratogenic if it does not distend. sent8: if the foliation does not gall dolphinfish then the fact that it is a grinding and it is hemodynamics is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the bunchgrass is not revocable hold then it is teratogenic and it is telluric. sent10: there is something such that if it is not counterterror it is nervous and it is symmetrical. sent11: the tupik is both a saltshaker and a revoke. sent12: the bunchgrass is not hemodynamics if it is not a kind of an equine. sent13: the bunchgrass is quartzose and a portfolio if it is not a kind of an equine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bunchgrass is not an equine.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the bunchgrass is not hemodynamics.; sent4 -> int2: that the bunchgrass is teratogenic and it does variegate cadmium is not true if the fact that it is not hemodynamics is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the bunchgrass is teratogenic and does variegate cadmium is not true.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the bunchgrass is not equine then that it is teratogenic and it variegates cadmium is not true.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not an equine then that it is teratogenic and it variegates cadmium is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the great-niece is not obtuse. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a smoothie it is perceptual and it tallies. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not skydive then it does pit navy and is perceptual. sent4: if something is not hemodynamics then that it is teratogenic and it variegates cadmium does not hold. sent5: the bunchgrass does not variegate infructescence. sent6: the bunchgrass is a fable and it is a kind of a corduroy. sent7: the bunchgrass is not teratogenic if it does not distend. sent8: if the foliation does not gall dolphinfish then the fact that it is a grinding and it is hemodynamics is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the bunchgrass is not revocable hold then it is teratogenic and it is telluric. sent10: there is something such that if it is not counterterror it is nervous and it is symmetrical. sent11: the tupik is both a saltshaker and a revoke. sent12: the bunchgrass is not hemodynamics if it is not a kind of an equine. sent13: the bunchgrass is quartzose and a portfolio if it is not a kind of an equine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bunchgrass is not an equine.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the bunchgrass is not hemodynamics.; sent4 -> int2: that the bunchgrass is teratogenic and it does variegate cadmium is not true if the fact that it is not hemodynamics is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the bunchgrass is teratogenic and does variegate cadmium is not true.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the bunchgrass is not equine then that it is teratogenic and it variegates cadmium is not true.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__