the stabilizer is an abdominal.
sent1: the stag parties. sent2: the navicular does not assent if the beryllium does suckle heedlessness and it is dyadic. sent3: that the stag is a kind of a hymeneal is not incorrect. sent4: the stag suckles heedlessness. sent5: the stag suckles heedlessness and it assents if the beryllium does not suckles heedlessness. sent6: the mascarpone is an assent that elongates. sent7: if something assents then it is an abdominal. sent8: the stag is an assent. sent9: the stabilizer is an abdominal and it assents if the stag is not an abdominal. sent10: the beryllium is not an abdominal if the stabilizer suckles heedlessness and is dyadic. sent11: the fact that the beryllium does suckle heedlessness is right. sent12: the stag does not suckle heedlessness if the beryllium is an abdominal and it is an assent. sent13: the beryllium suckles heedlessness and is dyadic. sent14: if the navicular is not a kind of an assent the stag is an assent and moderates. sent15: the stag does assent if the navicular is not an assent. sent16: if the stabilizer is a party then that it moderates and it is not hymeneal is wrong. sent17: if the stag does not moderate then the fact that the navicular is not an assent but it is a two-piece is not right. sent18: the stag is an assent and is dyadic. sent19: if the stag is not a kind of an assent the navicular is an assent that is moderating.
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the navicular is not an assent.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the stag assents and it does moderate.; int2 -> int3: that the stag moderates is true.;
the stabilizer is not abdominal.
sent1 & sent3 -> int4: the stag is both a party and hymeneal.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it does party and is a kind of a hymeneal.;
$hypothesis$ = the stabilizer is an abdominal. ; $context$ = sent1: the stag parties. sent2: the navicular does not assent if the beryllium does suckle heedlessness and it is dyadic. sent3: that the stag is a kind of a hymeneal is not incorrect. sent4: the stag suckles heedlessness. sent5: the stag suckles heedlessness and it assents if the beryllium does not suckles heedlessness. sent6: the mascarpone is an assent that elongates. sent7: if something assents then it is an abdominal. sent8: the stag is an assent. sent9: the stabilizer is an abdominal and it assents if the stag is not an abdominal. sent10: the beryllium is not an abdominal if the stabilizer suckles heedlessness and is dyadic. sent11: the fact that the beryllium does suckle heedlessness is right. sent12: the stag does not suckle heedlessness if the beryllium is an abdominal and it is an assent. sent13: the beryllium suckles heedlessness and is dyadic. sent14: if the navicular is not a kind of an assent the stag is an assent and moderates. sent15: the stag does assent if the navicular is not an assent. sent16: if the stabilizer is a party then that it moderates and it is not hymeneal is wrong. sent17: if the stag does not moderate then the fact that the navicular is not an assent but it is a two-piece is not right. sent18: the stag is an assent and is dyadic. sent19: if the stag is not a kind of an assent the navicular is an assent that is moderating. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the navicular is not an assent.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the stag assents and it does moderate.; int2 -> int3: that the stag moderates is true.; __UNKNOWN__