the fact that that the motionalness does not occur and the simoom does not occur is incorrect if the dramaturgicness occurs is false.
sent1: that the motionalness does not occur but the simoom happens is wrong. sent2: the retaliation occurs. sent3: if the dramaturgicness occurs then the fact that the motionalness but not the simoom occurs does not hold. sent4: if the wowing hyphen does not occur the fact that both the non-hardness and the non-Cameroonianness occurs is not true. sent5: that the motionalness but not the simoom occurs is incorrect if the preposing ambulacrum does not occur. sent6: the motionalness does not occur and the simoom does not occur if that the dramaturgicness occurs is true. sent7: the banishment happens. sent8: if the dramaturgicness happens then the fact that that both the non-motionalness and the simoom happens is wrong is not false. sent9: the dramaturgicness does not occur if the preposing ambulacrum occurs. sent10: the dramaturgicness happens if the preposing ambulacrum occurs. sent11: the fact that the non-motionalness and the simoom happens is not correct if the preposing ambulacrum does not occur. sent12: the drivel happens. sent13: the fact that that the motionalness does not occur and the simoom does not occur is not incorrect does not hold if that the preposing ambulacrum does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the motionalness occurs but the simoom does not occur is not right. sent15: the fact that the preposing titanium does not occur is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dramaturgicness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the preposing ambulacrum occurs.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the dramaturgicness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the preposing ambulacrum does not occur.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the motionalness does not occur and the simoom does not occur is not right.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the motionalness does not occur and the simoom does not occur is incorrect if the dramaturgicness occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the motionalness does not occur but the simoom happens is wrong. sent2: the retaliation occurs. sent3: if the dramaturgicness occurs then the fact that the motionalness but not the simoom occurs does not hold. sent4: if the wowing hyphen does not occur the fact that both the non-hardness and the non-Cameroonianness occurs is not true. sent5: that the motionalness but not the simoom occurs is incorrect if the preposing ambulacrum does not occur. sent6: the motionalness does not occur and the simoom does not occur if that the dramaturgicness occurs is true. sent7: the banishment happens. sent8: if the dramaturgicness happens then the fact that that both the non-motionalness and the simoom happens is wrong is not false. sent9: the dramaturgicness does not occur if the preposing ambulacrum occurs. sent10: the dramaturgicness happens if the preposing ambulacrum occurs. sent11: the fact that the non-motionalness and the simoom happens is not correct if the preposing ambulacrum does not occur. sent12: the drivel happens. sent13: the fact that that the motionalness does not occur and the simoom does not occur is not incorrect does not hold if that the preposing ambulacrum does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the motionalness occurs but the simoom does not occur is not right. sent15: the fact that the preposing titanium does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dramaturgicness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the preposing ambulacrum occurs.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the dramaturgicness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the preposing ambulacrum does not occur.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the motionalness does not occur and the simoom does not occur is not right.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__