the fact that the abientness does not occur is not false.
sent1: if the fact that the fact that the blazing but not the stranglehold happens is right is incorrect then the blazing does not occur. sent2: that the senior does not occur is brought about by that the over-the-counterness does not occur and the basilarness happens. sent3: if that the over-the-counterness and the browsing occurs is incorrect the adjective does not occur. sent4: if the blazing occurs the penitentness occurs. sent5: that the premiership does not occur is right if the correction occurs. sent6: if the fact that either the sleeping does not occur or the disintegration does not occur or both is incorrect the over-the-counterness does not occur. sent7: if the basilarness does not occur the fact that the over-the-counterness occurs and the browse happens is not right. sent8: that the blaze occurs is triggered by that the elbowing happens. sent9: the non-aldehydicness and the leptosporangiateness occurs. sent10: the neglecting spurge occurs. sent11: the basilarness occurs and the greenmail does not occur if the neglecting spurge happens. sent12: if the penitent occurs and/or the stranglehold happens the abientness does not occur. sent13: that the browse happens prevents the non-abientness. sent14: the browse does not occur. sent15: the decomposition or the vocativeness or both happens. sent16: if the browse does not occur that the sleeping does not occur or the disintegration does not occur or both is not true.
sent16 & sent14 -> int1: that the sleeping does not occur and/or the disintegration does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the over-the-counterness does not occur.; sent11 & sent10 -> int3: the basilarness happens but the greenmail does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the basilarness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the non-over-the-counterness and the basilarness happens.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the senior does not occur.;
the adjective does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the abientness does not occur is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the fact that the blazing but not the stranglehold happens is right is incorrect then the blazing does not occur. sent2: that the senior does not occur is brought about by that the over-the-counterness does not occur and the basilarness happens. sent3: if that the over-the-counterness and the browsing occurs is incorrect the adjective does not occur. sent4: if the blazing occurs the penitentness occurs. sent5: that the premiership does not occur is right if the correction occurs. sent6: if the fact that either the sleeping does not occur or the disintegration does not occur or both is incorrect the over-the-counterness does not occur. sent7: if the basilarness does not occur the fact that the over-the-counterness occurs and the browse happens is not right. sent8: that the blaze occurs is triggered by that the elbowing happens. sent9: the non-aldehydicness and the leptosporangiateness occurs. sent10: the neglecting spurge occurs. sent11: the basilarness occurs and the greenmail does not occur if the neglecting spurge happens. sent12: if the penitent occurs and/or the stranglehold happens the abientness does not occur. sent13: that the browse happens prevents the non-abientness. sent14: the browse does not occur. sent15: the decomposition or the vocativeness or both happens. sent16: if the browse does not occur that the sleeping does not occur or the disintegration does not occur or both is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent14 -> int1: that the sleeping does not occur and/or the disintegration does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the over-the-counterness does not occur.; sent11 & sent10 -> int3: the basilarness happens but the greenmail does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the basilarness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the non-over-the-counterness and the basilarness happens.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the senior does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__