the chemical is not genic.
sent1: that the chemical does not blind Monodontidae and/or does not accouter pituitary is correct if the nitrofuran is not disobedient. sent2: something accouters pituitary if the fact that it either is not a kind of an oblong or does not lean columniation or both is not right. sent3: something is not genic if that it does not blind Monodontidae and/or does not accouter pituitary is not incorrect. sent4: something is rabbinical and obedient if it does blind Monodontidae. sent5: something does repot bowsprit if that it is not autolytic or not a steppe or both is false. sent6: if the phalanx does accouter pituitary the chemical does blind Monodontidae. sent7: the fact that either the phalanx is not a kind of an oblong or it does not lean columniation or both is not true if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a consistency. sent8: something that is rabbinical thing that is not disobedient is genic. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not a consistency is not wrong.
sent2 -> int1: the phalanx accouters pituitary if that it is not an oblong or does not lean columniation or both is not true.; sent9 & sent7 -> int2: that the phalanx is not a kind of an oblong and/or it does not lean columniation is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the phalanx does accouter pituitary is not wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the chemical blinds Monodontidae.; sent4 -> int5: if the chemical blinds Monodontidae it is rabbinical thing that is not disobedient.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chemical is rabbinical but it is obedient.; sent8 -> int7: the chemical is genic if it is both rabbinical and obedient.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the chemical is not genic.
sent3 -> int8: if the chemical does not blind Monodontidae and/or it does not accouter pituitary it is non-genic.;
$hypothesis$ = the chemical is not genic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the chemical does not blind Monodontidae and/or does not accouter pituitary is correct if the nitrofuran is not disobedient. sent2: something accouters pituitary if the fact that it either is not a kind of an oblong or does not lean columniation or both is not right. sent3: something is not genic if that it does not blind Monodontidae and/or does not accouter pituitary is not incorrect. sent4: something is rabbinical and obedient if it does blind Monodontidae. sent5: something does repot bowsprit if that it is not autolytic or not a steppe or both is false. sent6: if the phalanx does accouter pituitary the chemical does blind Monodontidae. sent7: the fact that either the phalanx is not a kind of an oblong or it does not lean columniation or both is not true if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a consistency. sent8: something that is rabbinical thing that is not disobedient is genic. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not a consistency is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the phalanx accouters pituitary if that it is not an oblong or does not lean columniation or both is not true.; sent9 & sent7 -> int2: that the phalanx is not a kind of an oblong and/or it does not lean columniation is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the phalanx does accouter pituitary is not wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the chemical blinds Monodontidae.; sent4 -> int5: if the chemical blinds Monodontidae it is rabbinical thing that is not disobedient.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chemical is rabbinical but it is obedient.; sent8 -> int7: the chemical is genic if it is both rabbinical and obedient.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__