the fuselage is a text and/or it does correspond Atlantic.
sent1: the fuselage does not correspond Atlantic. sent2: if the Etruscan is not agrypnotic then that the sandwort is enolic does not hold. sent3: if the Etruscan is a kind of a text then the fuselage is a text. sent4: the Etruscan is not agrypnotic. sent5: the fact that either the fuselage is a kind of a text or it corresponds Atlantic or both is not true if the sandwort does not corresponds Atlantic. sent6: the sandwort is not enolic and does not correspond Atlantic if the Etruscan is not agrypnotic.
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the sandwort is non-enolic thing that does not correspond Atlantic.; int1 -> int2: the sandwort does not correspond Atlantic.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fuselage is a text and/or it does correspond Atlantic.
$hypothesis$ = the fuselage is a text and/or it does correspond Atlantic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fuselage does not correspond Atlantic. sent2: if the Etruscan is not agrypnotic then that the sandwort is enolic does not hold. sent3: if the Etruscan is a kind of a text then the fuselage is a text. sent4: the Etruscan is not agrypnotic. sent5: the fact that either the fuselage is a kind of a text or it corresponds Atlantic or both is not true if the sandwort does not corresponds Atlantic. sent6: the sandwort is not enolic and does not correspond Atlantic if the Etruscan is not agrypnotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the sandwort is non-enolic thing that does not correspond Atlantic.; int1 -> int2: the sandwort does not correspond Atlantic.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__