if the glint occurs then the nearness occurs.
sent1: the protozoalness happens. sent2: the fact that the unplugging occurs and/or the clouding orthoepist does not occur is wrong if the bifurcation happens. sent3: if that both the non-apoplecticness and the gratefulness happens is not right then the unfitness occurs. sent4: the glint happens and the sampling Harlem happens if the articularness does not occur. sent5: the Atlantic does not occur if the fact that the unplugging happens and/or the clouding orthoepist does not occur is wrong. sent6: if the Atlanticness does not occur then both the non-articularness and the nearness happens. sent7: the articularness does not occur. sent8: that the inflating lymphocyte happens and the bifurcation occurs is triggered by that the clanging does not occur. sent9: the bronchospasm does not occur. sent10: the clang does not occur if the fact that the mowing does not occur and the deforestation does not occur is not correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the glint but the articularness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the glint does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glint occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the glint does not occur and the articularness occurs is not true is not wrong.;
the sampling Harlem happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the glint occurs then the nearness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the protozoalness happens. sent2: the fact that the unplugging occurs and/or the clouding orthoepist does not occur is wrong if the bifurcation happens. sent3: if that both the non-apoplecticness and the gratefulness happens is not right then the unfitness occurs. sent4: the glint happens and the sampling Harlem happens if the articularness does not occur. sent5: the Atlantic does not occur if the fact that the unplugging happens and/or the clouding orthoepist does not occur is wrong. sent6: if the Atlanticness does not occur then both the non-articularness and the nearness happens. sent7: the articularness does not occur. sent8: that the inflating lymphocyte happens and the bifurcation occurs is triggered by that the clanging does not occur. sent9: the bronchospasm does not occur. sent10: the clang does not occur if the fact that the mowing does not occur and the deforestation does not occur is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the glint but the articularness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the glint does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glint occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the glint does not occur and the articularness occurs is not true is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__