the fact that the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a playbox then it is non-accessional thing that vrooms hold is not correct.
sent1: the straightedge is not a vroom if there is something such that that it is accessional and not a scramble is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a playbox it is not accessional. sent3: there is something such that if it is a playbox then it is a kind of non-accessional thing that is a kind of a vroom. sent4: the viroid is not accessional. sent5: the axil is pervious or it is soteriological or both. sent6: the rule is fibrocalcific if that the wolf is a kind of non-imperative thing that is not Puranic is not correct. sent7: if the axil is powerless it is pervious and/or it is soteriological. sent8: that the axil is pervious and/or it is not soteriological is incorrect. sent9: a powerful thing that is not a kind of a playbox is not accessional. sent10: if the fact that the viroid does not scramble is right then the supremo is a kind of a scramble. sent11: something that is non-powerless a playbox is not accessional. sent12: if the supremo does scramble the axil is a vroom. sent13: the axil is a scramble. sent14: the viroid is either not a scramble or not fibrocalcific or both. sent15: the fact that the Mon is accessional and is not a kind of a scramble is not right if the rule is fibrocalcific. sent16: if the tuberculin is a playbox then the viroid is powerless. sent17: if the axil is pervious then the cocobolo is not pervious. sent18: if the purgative is not convenient then the wolf is a kind of a whacker. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a playbox then it is non-fibrocalcific and it does scramble. sent20: the purgative is not non-spermicidal and/or it is inconvenient. sent21: if the purgative is spermicidal then that the wolf is a kind of a whacker hold. sent22: the Jap is not a crag and it is not fibrocalcific. sent23: if the axil is powerless then it is pervious or it is not soteriological or both. sent24: the supremo is a scramble if the viroid is not fibrocalcific. sent25: the supremo is powerless or it is pervious or both if there exists something such that it is powerless. sent26: that something is non-imperative and non-Puranic is not correct if it is a whacker. sent27: that the tuberculin is not a kind of a playbox but it is a kind of a vroom is incorrect if that there is something such that it is not a kind of a vroom is true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the axil is powerless.; sent23 & assump2 -> int1: the axil is pervious and/or it is not soteriological.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the axil is not powerless hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the axil is not a playbox.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the axil is not powerless and it is not a kind of a playbox.; sent9 -> int5: the axil is not accessional if it is not powerless and is not a playbox.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the axil is not accessional.; sent14 & sent10 & sent24 -> int7: the supremo is a scramble.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the axil is a vroom.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the axil is non-accessional but it is a vroom.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: if the axil is not a kind of a playbox it is not accessional and it is a kind of a vroom.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the cocobolo is not pervious.
sent26 -> int11: that the wolf is not a kind of an imperative and it is not Puranic does not hold if it is a whacker.; sent20 & sent21 & sent18 -> int12: the wolf is a whacker.; int11 & int12 -> int13: that the wolf is non-imperative thing that is not Puranic is not true.; sent6 & int13 -> int14: the rule is fibrocalcific.; sent15 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the Mon is accessional but it is not a scramble is not correct.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it is accessional and it is not a scramble does not hold.; int16 & sent1 -> int17: the straightedge is not a kind of a vroom.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it does not vroom is not wrong.; int18 & sent27 -> int19: the fact that the tuberculin is not a playbox but it does vroom does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a playbox then it is non-accessional thing that vrooms hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the straightedge is not a vroom if there is something such that that it is accessional and not a scramble is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a playbox it is not accessional. sent3: there is something such that if it is a playbox then it is a kind of non-accessional thing that is a kind of a vroom. sent4: the viroid is not accessional. sent5: the axil is pervious or it is soteriological or both. sent6: the rule is fibrocalcific if that the wolf is a kind of non-imperative thing that is not Puranic is not correct. sent7: if the axil is powerless it is pervious and/or it is soteriological. sent8: that the axil is pervious and/or it is not soteriological is incorrect. sent9: a powerful thing that is not a kind of a playbox is not accessional. sent10: if the fact that the viroid does not scramble is right then the supremo is a kind of a scramble. sent11: something that is non-powerless a playbox is not accessional. sent12: if the supremo does scramble the axil is a vroom. sent13: the axil is a scramble. sent14: the viroid is either not a scramble or not fibrocalcific or both. sent15: the fact that the Mon is accessional and is not a kind of a scramble is not right if the rule is fibrocalcific. sent16: if the tuberculin is a playbox then the viroid is powerless. sent17: if the axil is pervious then the cocobolo is not pervious. sent18: if the purgative is not convenient then the wolf is a kind of a whacker. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a playbox then it is non-fibrocalcific and it does scramble. sent20: the purgative is not non-spermicidal and/or it is inconvenient. sent21: if the purgative is spermicidal then that the wolf is a kind of a whacker hold. sent22: the Jap is not a crag and it is not fibrocalcific. sent23: if the axil is powerless then it is pervious or it is not soteriological or both. sent24: the supremo is a scramble if the viroid is not fibrocalcific. sent25: the supremo is powerless or it is pervious or both if there exists something such that it is powerless. sent26: that something is non-imperative and non-Puranic is not correct if it is a whacker. sent27: that the tuberculin is not a kind of a playbox but it is a kind of a vroom is incorrect if that there is something such that it is not a kind of a vroom is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the axil is powerless.; sent23 & assump2 -> int1: the axil is pervious and/or it is not soteriological.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the axil is not powerless hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the axil is not a playbox.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the axil is not powerless and it is not a kind of a playbox.; sent9 -> int5: the axil is not accessional if it is not powerless and is not a playbox.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the axil is not accessional.; sent14 & sent10 & sent24 -> int7: the supremo is a scramble.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the axil is a vroom.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the axil is non-accessional but it is a vroom.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: if the axil is not a kind of a playbox it is not accessional and it is a kind of a vroom.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__