the transferring continuum occurs and the laryngectomy happens.
sent1: if the acuminating happens then the referring Medoc does not occur and the overhaul does not occur. sent2: that the self-control does not occur yields that the recreating occurs but the raiding does not occur. sent3: if that not the demoralizing but the laryngectomy occurs is incorrect the demoralizing occurs. sent4: the laryngectomy happens. sent5: both the referring asper and the transferring continuum happens. sent6: that the demoralizing does not occur and the laryngectomy happens is wrong if the transferring continuum does not occur. sent7: that the acuminating does not occur is prevented by that the recreating but not the raid happens. sent8: if the referring Medoc does not occur and the overhaul does not occur then the fact that the transferring continuum does not occur is not false.
sent5 -> int1: the transferring continuum happens.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the demoralizing and the sartorialness happens is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the transferring continuum occurs and the laryngectomy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the acuminating happens then the referring Medoc does not occur and the overhaul does not occur. sent2: that the self-control does not occur yields that the recreating occurs but the raiding does not occur. sent3: if that not the demoralizing but the laryngectomy occurs is incorrect the demoralizing occurs. sent4: the laryngectomy happens. sent5: both the referring asper and the transferring continuum happens. sent6: that the demoralizing does not occur and the laryngectomy happens is wrong if the transferring continuum does not occur. sent7: that the acuminating does not occur is prevented by that the recreating but not the raid happens. sent8: if the referring Medoc does not occur and the overhaul does not occur then the fact that the transferring continuum does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the transferring continuum happens.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__