the fact that the blinding minuteness does not occur and/or the accompaniment happens is not correct.
sent1: if the repoting Bible occurs then not the banditry but the repoting acromion occurs. sent2: that the extroversiveness does not occur and/or the ipsilateralness happens is not correct if the fact that the comfortableness does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the fact that not the responding but the charting happens is false. sent4: that both the non-rotatoryness and the tearfulness occurs is brought about by that the actualizing occurs. sent5: both the non-allness and the transubstantiation occurs. sent6: the blinding kipper happens. sent7: that the banditry does not occur is prevented by that the repoting vegetation occurs. sent8: that the non-extroversiveness or the buckle or both happens is false. sent9: the fact that the repoting vegetation does not occur but the casualty happens does not hold. sent10: that the subjectiveness occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the accoutering pastorale happens. sent12: the apostolicness does not occur. sent13: the repoting acromion occurs if the repoting Bible happens. sent14: if that the repoting vegetation does not occur but the casualty happens is not right the repoting vegetation happens. sent15: the fact that if the leaning tendency does not occur that the non-fibrilloseness or the takedown or both occurs is false hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the repoting Bible happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: not the banditry but the repoting acromion happens.; int1 -> int2: the banditry does not occur.; sent14 & sent9 -> int3: the repoting vegetation happens.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the banditry happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the repoting Bible does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the blinding minuteness does not occur and/or the accompaniment happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the repoting Bible occurs then not the banditry but the repoting acromion occurs. sent2: that the extroversiveness does not occur and/or the ipsilateralness happens is not correct if the fact that the comfortableness does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the fact that not the responding but the charting happens is false. sent4: that both the non-rotatoryness and the tearfulness occurs is brought about by that the actualizing occurs. sent5: both the non-allness and the transubstantiation occurs. sent6: the blinding kipper happens. sent7: that the banditry does not occur is prevented by that the repoting vegetation occurs. sent8: that the non-extroversiveness or the buckle or both happens is false. sent9: the fact that the repoting vegetation does not occur but the casualty happens does not hold. sent10: that the subjectiveness occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the accoutering pastorale happens. sent12: the apostolicness does not occur. sent13: the repoting acromion occurs if the repoting Bible happens. sent14: if that the repoting vegetation does not occur but the casualty happens is not right the repoting vegetation happens. sent15: the fact that if the leaning tendency does not occur that the non-fibrilloseness or the takedown or both occurs is false hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the repoting Bible happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: not the banditry but the repoting acromion happens.; int1 -> int2: the banditry does not occur.; sent14 & sent9 -> int3: the repoting vegetation happens.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the banditry happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the repoting Bible does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__