the Labourite is a kind of a brassiere that is not a oyster-fish.
sent1: the pyrophosphate blinkers somersault but it does not orchestrate sweatshop. sent2: something does not orchestrate talkie and does not blinker somersault. sent3: if there is something such that it does not burglarize Maugham and does not hunger pull-up then the Wobbly is not a kind of a duffer. sent4: the pyrophosphate does not orchestrate sweatshop. sent5: if the augur burglarizes Maugham then the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie and hungers pull-up. sent6: that the Labourite is a brassiere but it is not a oyster-fish if the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie is not wrong. sent7: if that the pyrophosphate blinkers somersault and does not orchestrate sweatshop is not incorrect then the augur does not orchestrate sweatshop. sent8: if something is not paleolithic then the fact that it does not establish and is not salable is incorrect. sent9: if the roulette is not nonprescription then that it does not confabulate and it does not blinker fluphenazine does not hold. sent10: if something is not big and it is not a kind of a duffer then that it does not orchestrate talkie is right. sent11: the Labourite is a brassiere if the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie. sent12: that something is a brassiere and is not a oyster-fish is not true if it is big. sent13: there exists something such that it does not burglarize Maugham and it does not hunger pull-up. sent14: the pyrophosphate is not paleolithic if there exists something such that that it does not confabulate and it does not blinker fluphenazine is not right. sent15: that the roulette is a kind of a IPV and does not burglarize pyrophosphate is wrong. sent16: if the Wobbly is big the augur orchestrates sweatshop. sent17: if that something is a kind of a IPV but it does not burglarize pyrophosphate is not true it is not nonprescription. sent18: that the pyrophosphate does not orchestrate sweatshop is not wrong if something does not orchestrate talkie and it does not blinker somersault. sent19: something does burglarize Maugham but it does not hunger pull-up. sent20: if the Wobbly is a kind of non-big thing that does not orchestrate sweatshop that it is not a brassiere hold. sent21: the Labourite is a kind of a brassiere. sent22: something does burglarize Maugham and blinkers somersault if it is conscientious. sent23: if the pyrophosphate does not blinker somersault and it is not a oyster-fish then it is not a duffer. sent24: the Labourite is not a duffer if the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie and hungers pull-up. sent25: there is something such that it does not hunger pull-up. sent26: that the augur orchestrates talkie is not wrong if the Wobbly does orchestrate sweatshop.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Wobbly is big hold.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the augur orchestrates sweatshop.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the augur does not orchestrate sweatshop is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Wobbly is not big.; sent13 & sent3 -> int5: the Wobbly is not a duffer.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Wobbly is not big and it is not a duffer.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie is correct if it is not big and is not a duffer.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie hold.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the Labourite is a brassiere but it is not a oyster-fish does not hold.
sent12 -> int9: if that the Labourite is big is not incorrect the fact that it is a kind of a brassiere and is not a kind of a oyster-fish is not correct.; sent22 -> int10: if the augur is not unconscientious it does burglarize Maugham and blinkers somersault.; sent8 -> int11: that the pyrophosphate does not establish and is not salable is false if it is not paleolithic.; sent17 -> int12: if the fact that the roulette is a IPV that does not burglarize pyrophosphate is not true then it is prescription.; int12 & sent15 -> int13: the roulette is not nonprescription.; sent9 & int13 -> int14: that the roulette does not confabulate and does not blinker fluphenazine is not right.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it does not confabulate and it does not blinker fluphenazine is wrong.; int15 & sent14 -> int16: the pyrophosphate is not paleolithic.; int11 & int16 -> int17: that the pyrophosphate does not establish and is not salable is incorrect.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that the fact that it does not establish and it is not salable is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the Labourite is a kind of a brassiere that is not a oyster-fish. ; $context$ = sent1: the pyrophosphate blinkers somersault but it does not orchestrate sweatshop. sent2: something does not orchestrate talkie and does not blinker somersault. sent3: if there is something such that it does not burglarize Maugham and does not hunger pull-up then the Wobbly is not a kind of a duffer. sent4: the pyrophosphate does not orchestrate sweatshop. sent5: if the augur burglarizes Maugham then the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie and hungers pull-up. sent6: that the Labourite is a brassiere but it is not a oyster-fish if the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie is not wrong. sent7: if that the pyrophosphate blinkers somersault and does not orchestrate sweatshop is not incorrect then the augur does not orchestrate sweatshop. sent8: if something is not paleolithic then the fact that it does not establish and is not salable is incorrect. sent9: if the roulette is not nonprescription then that it does not confabulate and it does not blinker fluphenazine does not hold. sent10: if something is not big and it is not a kind of a duffer then that it does not orchestrate talkie is right. sent11: the Labourite is a brassiere if the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie. sent12: that something is a brassiere and is not a oyster-fish is not true if it is big. sent13: there exists something such that it does not burglarize Maugham and it does not hunger pull-up. sent14: the pyrophosphate is not paleolithic if there exists something such that that it does not confabulate and it does not blinker fluphenazine is not right. sent15: that the roulette is a kind of a IPV and does not burglarize pyrophosphate is wrong. sent16: if the Wobbly is big the augur orchestrates sweatshop. sent17: if that something is a kind of a IPV but it does not burglarize pyrophosphate is not true it is not nonprescription. sent18: that the pyrophosphate does not orchestrate sweatshop is not wrong if something does not orchestrate talkie and it does not blinker somersault. sent19: something does burglarize Maugham but it does not hunger pull-up. sent20: if the Wobbly is a kind of non-big thing that does not orchestrate sweatshop that it is not a brassiere hold. sent21: the Labourite is a kind of a brassiere. sent22: something does burglarize Maugham and blinkers somersault if it is conscientious. sent23: if the pyrophosphate does not blinker somersault and it is not a oyster-fish then it is not a duffer. sent24: the Labourite is not a duffer if the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie and hungers pull-up. sent25: there is something such that it does not hunger pull-up. sent26: that the augur orchestrates talkie is not wrong if the Wobbly does orchestrate sweatshop. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Wobbly is big hold.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the augur orchestrates sweatshop.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the augur does not orchestrate sweatshop is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Wobbly is not big.; sent13 & sent3 -> int5: the Wobbly is not a duffer.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Wobbly is not big and it is not a duffer.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie is correct if it is not big and is not a duffer.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the Wobbly does not orchestrate talkie hold.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__