the genius does not upload cramped but it is propulsive.
sent1: if something is not non-psychomotor it does not upload cramped. sent2: the jerk is axial if it is not unseamanlike. sent3: the genius does curl and is not particulate. sent4: the jerk is not unseamanlike. sent5: the jerk is not a screamer. sent6: that the jerk is a thyroglobulin but it is not a festination is wrong. sent7: a non-leafy thing is both non-axial and not seamanlike. sent8: everything is sanitary. sent9: the genius is unseamanlike. sent10: the genius is a phytoplankton but it is not synchronic. sent11: something is not leafy if it does upload fruitwood and is multilingual. sent12: if that the arrowsmith is not axial but it is unseamanlike is not wrong the jerk uploads cramped. sent13: everything is leafy. sent14: the fact that the genius is not non-leafy is true. sent15: something does not upload cramped if the fact that it is patriotic and it is not psychomotor does not hold. sent16: the jerk is psychomotor. sent17: everything is propulsive and it is leafy. sent18: the fact that the genius is patriotic and psychomotor is false. sent19: the jerk is fascist and deconstructionist. sent20: the genius is not a squirrel. sent21: the jerk is not axial if the genius is patriotic and not psychomotor. sent22: the jerk is not a kind of a May. sent23: the arrowsmith uploads fruitwood. sent24: the buffalo is not a disentangler if the fact that it is a kind of a screamer that does not upload cramped is wrong. sent25: if the genius is patriotic and psychomotor the jerk is not axial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genius is patriotic but it is not psychomotor.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the jerk is not axial is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the jerk is axial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that that the genius is patriotic but it is not psychomotor is incorrect is true.; sent15 -> int5: if the fact that the genius is patriotic but it is not psychomotor is wrong the fact that it does not upload cramped hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the genius does not upload cramped.; sent17 -> int7: the genius is propulsive and is leafy.; int7 -> int8: the genius is propulsive.; int6 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the genius does not upload cramped and is propulsive does not hold.
sent7 -> int9: the arrowsmith is not axial but unseamanlike if it is not leafy.; sent11 -> int10: if the arrowsmith does upload fruitwood and it is multilingual it is not leafy.;
$hypothesis$ = the genius does not upload cramped but it is propulsive. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not non-psychomotor it does not upload cramped. sent2: the jerk is axial if it is not unseamanlike. sent3: the genius does curl and is not particulate. sent4: the jerk is not unseamanlike. sent5: the jerk is not a screamer. sent6: that the jerk is a thyroglobulin but it is not a festination is wrong. sent7: a non-leafy thing is both non-axial and not seamanlike. sent8: everything is sanitary. sent9: the genius is unseamanlike. sent10: the genius is a phytoplankton but it is not synchronic. sent11: something is not leafy if it does upload fruitwood and is multilingual. sent12: if that the arrowsmith is not axial but it is unseamanlike is not wrong the jerk uploads cramped. sent13: everything is leafy. sent14: the fact that the genius is not non-leafy is true. sent15: something does not upload cramped if the fact that it is patriotic and it is not psychomotor does not hold. sent16: the jerk is psychomotor. sent17: everything is propulsive and it is leafy. sent18: the fact that the genius is patriotic and psychomotor is false. sent19: the jerk is fascist and deconstructionist. sent20: the genius is not a squirrel. sent21: the jerk is not axial if the genius is patriotic and not psychomotor. sent22: the jerk is not a kind of a May. sent23: the arrowsmith uploads fruitwood. sent24: the buffalo is not a disentangler if the fact that it is a kind of a screamer that does not upload cramped is wrong. sent25: if the genius is patriotic and psychomotor the jerk is not axial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genius is patriotic but it is not psychomotor.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the jerk is not axial is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the jerk is axial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that that the genius is patriotic but it is not psychomotor is incorrect is true.; sent15 -> int5: if the fact that the genius is patriotic but it is not psychomotor is wrong the fact that it does not upload cramped hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the genius does not upload cramped.; sent17 -> int7: the genius is propulsive and is leafy.; int7 -> int8: the genius is propulsive.; int6 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__