the Hoover is not unproductive.
sent1: there is nothing such that it is a kind of productive thing that japans backboard. sent2: if that the loudspeaker does japan backboard and/or it is not pemphigous is not right then the foreplay is not a steamer. sent3: the fact that the foreplay is not a steamer is not incorrect if that the loudspeaker either does not japan backboard or is not pemphigous or both is false. sent4: the lifeguard is either not pemphigous or a Dominican or both. sent5: that the Hoover is not obstetrics and/or it is not a everlastingness is wrong. sent6: the fact that the loudspeaker does japan backboard is true. sent7: the Hoover is not productive if the lifeguard is not a Dominican or it is a kind of a steamer or both. sent8: the Tsimshian is not pemphigous if it does not horripilate. sent9: if the fact that the Tsimshian is not a soupspoon but it horripilates is wrong it is not a Dominican. sent10: if something does not japan backboard then it is pemphigous and is not a kind of a steamer. sent11: the lifeguard is a Dominican and/or is a kind of a steamer if the fact that the foreplay is not a kind of a steamer hold. sent12: if that the Hoover is non-pemphigous is not incorrect the Tsimshian is not unproductive or is non-pemphigous or both. sent13: if the loudspeaker does not japan backboard and/or it does horripilate then that the Tsimshian is pemphigous hold. sent14: there exists nothing such that it is not a soupspoon and it does horripilate. sent15: if that the Tsimshian is not a soupspoon and horripilates is false then that it is not pemphigous is not false. sent16: the fact that the fact that the fact that the loudspeaker does not japan backboard and/or it is not a steamer is not wrong is incorrect is right. sent17: the lifeguard is not a Dominican or it does steamer or both if the fact that the foreplay is not a steamer is not false. sent18: there is nothing that is not a steamer and japans backboard. sent19: the lifeguard is Dominican and/or a steamer. sent20: the Tsimshian is not pemphigous if that it does not japan backboard and it does horripilate is false. sent21: the fact that the loudspeaker does not japan backboard and/or it is not pemphigous is wrong if the Tsimshian is not pemphigous. sent22: the Hoover is unproductive if the lifeguard is not a Dominican. sent23: something is not unproductive if it is both pemphigous and not a steamer. sent24: the loudspeaker is not Balzacian.
sent14 -> int1: that the Tsimshian is not a kind of a soupspoon and does horripilate does not hold.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the Tsimshian is not pemphigous.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the fact that the loudspeaker does not japan backboard and/or it is not pemphigous does not hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the foreplay does not steamer.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: either the lifeguard is not Dominican or it does steamer or both.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the Hoover is not unproductive.
sent23 -> int6: if the Hoover is pemphigous and does not steamer then it is not unproductive.; sent10 -> int7: if the Hoover does not japan backboard it is pemphigous and it is not a kind of a steamer.;
$hypothesis$ = the Hoover is not unproductive. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that it is a kind of productive thing that japans backboard. sent2: if that the loudspeaker does japan backboard and/or it is not pemphigous is not right then the foreplay is not a steamer. sent3: the fact that the foreplay is not a steamer is not incorrect if that the loudspeaker either does not japan backboard or is not pemphigous or both is false. sent4: the lifeguard is either not pemphigous or a Dominican or both. sent5: that the Hoover is not obstetrics and/or it is not a everlastingness is wrong. sent6: the fact that the loudspeaker does japan backboard is true. sent7: the Hoover is not productive if the lifeguard is not a Dominican or it is a kind of a steamer or both. sent8: the Tsimshian is not pemphigous if it does not horripilate. sent9: if the fact that the Tsimshian is not a soupspoon but it horripilates is wrong it is not a Dominican. sent10: if something does not japan backboard then it is pemphigous and is not a kind of a steamer. sent11: the lifeguard is a Dominican and/or is a kind of a steamer if the fact that the foreplay is not a kind of a steamer hold. sent12: if that the Hoover is non-pemphigous is not incorrect the Tsimshian is not unproductive or is non-pemphigous or both. sent13: if the loudspeaker does not japan backboard and/or it does horripilate then that the Tsimshian is pemphigous hold. sent14: there exists nothing such that it is not a soupspoon and it does horripilate. sent15: if that the Tsimshian is not a soupspoon and horripilates is false then that it is not pemphigous is not false. sent16: the fact that the fact that the fact that the loudspeaker does not japan backboard and/or it is not a steamer is not wrong is incorrect is right. sent17: the lifeguard is not a Dominican or it does steamer or both if the fact that the foreplay is not a steamer is not false. sent18: there is nothing that is not a steamer and japans backboard. sent19: the lifeguard is Dominican and/or a steamer. sent20: the Tsimshian is not pemphigous if that it does not japan backboard and it does horripilate is false. sent21: the fact that the loudspeaker does not japan backboard and/or it is not pemphigous is wrong if the Tsimshian is not pemphigous. sent22: the Hoover is unproductive if the lifeguard is not a Dominican. sent23: something is not unproductive if it is both pemphigous and not a steamer. sent24: the loudspeaker is not Balzacian. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: that the Tsimshian is not a kind of a soupspoon and does horripilate does not hold.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the Tsimshian is not pemphigous.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the fact that the loudspeaker does not japan backboard and/or it is not pemphigous does not hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the foreplay does not steamer.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: either the lifeguard is not Dominican or it does steamer or both.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__