the liposome is telegraphic.
sent1: that there exists something such that it varnishes and it is not carbonaceous is not incorrect. sent2: there is something such that that it does repot Physeter and it is unexpendable is not correct. sent3: if the glyceryl is both not a Orozco and not a pledged the liposome is telegraphic. sent4: the androecium is not a Menispermum. sent5: the liposome is not postmeridian. sent6: if something does varnish but it is not carbonaceous then the androecium does not repot Physeter. sent7: the glyceryl does not pledge if there is something such that that it repots Physeter and is not unexpendable does not hold. sent8: the glyceryl is telegraphic if the liposome is not antimonic but it is a Orozco. sent9: the fact that that the ambulatory is carbonaceous and is a Tallis is not right is right. sent10: the fact that the androecium is a pledged but it is not postmeridian is false. sent11: the liposome repots Physeter if it is telegraphic and it is not unexpendable. sent12: if the androecium is unexpendable and not postmeridian it repots Physeter. sent13: the androecium is unexpendable. sent14: something repots Physeter but it is not antimonic. sent15: if the liposome is expendable thing that does not repot Physeter then the androecium is telegraphic. sent16: the glyceryl is not antimonic if there exists something such that the fact that it is unexpendable thing that is not postmeridian is wrong. sent17: if there is something such that it is unexpendable and it is not antimonic then the glyceryl is not postmeridian. sent18: there is something such that it repots Physeter. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is a Orozco and it is not telegraphic is wrong the liposome is not antimonic. sent20: if there exists something such that it is telegraphic the glyceryl is not antimonic. sent21: something is not a Orozco and is not a kind of a pledged if the fact that it is not antimonic is not incorrect. sent22: the fact that the liposome is unexpendable and telegraphic is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the androecium is unexpendable but it is not postmeridian.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the androecium does repot Physeter.; sent1 & sent6 -> int2: the androecium does not repot Physeter.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the androecium is unexpendable and not postmeridian is not true is not incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of unexpendable thing that is non-postmeridian is not true.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the fact that the glyceryl is not antimonic is right.; sent21 -> int7: the glyceryl is not a kind of a Orozco and it is not a kind of a pledged if it is not antimonic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the glyceryl is not a Orozco and is not a kind of a pledged.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the liposome is telegraphic. ; $context$ = sent1: that there exists something such that it varnishes and it is not carbonaceous is not incorrect. sent2: there is something such that that it does repot Physeter and it is unexpendable is not correct. sent3: if the glyceryl is both not a Orozco and not a pledged the liposome is telegraphic. sent4: the androecium is not a Menispermum. sent5: the liposome is not postmeridian. sent6: if something does varnish but it is not carbonaceous then the androecium does not repot Physeter. sent7: the glyceryl does not pledge if there is something such that that it repots Physeter and is not unexpendable does not hold. sent8: the glyceryl is telegraphic if the liposome is not antimonic but it is a Orozco. sent9: the fact that that the ambulatory is carbonaceous and is a Tallis is not right is right. sent10: the fact that the androecium is a pledged but it is not postmeridian is false. sent11: the liposome repots Physeter if it is telegraphic and it is not unexpendable. sent12: if the androecium is unexpendable and not postmeridian it repots Physeter. sent13: the androecium is unexpendable. sent14: something repots Physeter but it is not antimonic. sent15: if the liposome is expendable thing that does not repot Physeter then the androecium is telegraphic. sent16: the glyceryl is not antimonic if there exists something such that the fact that it is unexpendable thing that is not postmeridian is wrong. sent17: if there is something such that it is unexpendable and it is not antimonic then the glyceryl is not postmeridian. sent18: there is something such that it repots Physeter. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is a Orozco and it is not telegraphic is wrong the liposome is not antimonic. sent20: if there exists something such that it is telegraphic the glyceryl is not antimonic. sent21: something is not a Orozco and is not a kind of a pledged if the fact that it is not antimonic is not incorrect. sent22: the fact that the liposome is unexpendable and telegraphic is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the androecium is unexpendable but it is not postmeridian.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the androecium does repot Physeter.; sent1 & sent6 -> int2: the androecium does not repot Physeter.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the androecium is unexpendable and not postmeridian is not true is not incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of unexpendable thing that is non-postmeridian is not true.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the fact that the glyceryl is not antimonic is right.; sent21 -> int7: the glyceryl is not a kind of a Orozco and it is not a kind of a pledged if it is not antimonic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the glyceryl is not a Orozco and is not a kind of a pledged.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__