the siloxane is not a cuneiform.
sent1: The custodianship does not weed microcyte. sent2: the microcyte does not weed custodianship. sent3: the fact that the microcyte does not revamp and it does not weed custodianship does not hold. sent4: if something does revamp the fact that it is not a Hinayanism and it does not better warfarin is false. sent5: the microcyte is not a gape and does not adhere. sent6: if the microcyte is a Hinayanism and does better warfarin it does not revamp. sent7: if the microcyte is not a kind of a Eurafrican and it is not a kind of a phlebotomist the siloxane is a cuneiform. sent8: the microcyte is a kind of a Hinayanism if it is not a gape and does not adhere. sent9: the microcyte is non-Eurafrican thing that is not a phlebotomist if it does not better warfarin.
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the microcyte is a kind of a Hinayanism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the microcyte betters warfarin.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the microcyte is a Hinayanism and it betters warfarin.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the microcyte does not revamp.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the microcyte does not revamp and it does not weed custodianship.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the microcyte does not better warfarin.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the microcyte is not a Eurafrican and not a phlebotomist.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the siloxane is not cuneiform.
sent4 -> int8: if the microcyte revamps that it is not a Hinayanism and does not better warfarin is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the siloxane is not a cuneiform. ; $context$ = sent1: The custodianship does not weed microcyte. sent2: the microcyte does not weed custodianship. sent3: the fact that the microcyte does not revamp and it does not weed custodianship does not hold. sent4: if something does revamp the fact that it is not a Hinayanism and it does not better warfarin is false. sent5: the microcyte is not a gape and does not adhere. sent6: if the microcyte is a Hinayanism and does better warfarin it does not revamp. sent7: if the microcyte is not a kind of a Eurafrican and it is not a kind of a phlebotomist the siloxane is a cuneiform. sent8: the microcyte is a kind of a Hinayanism if it is not a gape and does not adhere. sent9: the microcyte is non-Eurafrican thing that is not a phlebotomist if it does not better warfarin. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the microcyte is a kind of a Hinayanism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the microcyte betters warfarin.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the microcyte is a Hinayanism and it betters warfarin.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the microcyte does not revamp.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the microcyte does not revamp and it does not weed custodianship.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the microcyte does not better warfarin.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the microcyte is not a Eurafrican and not a phlebotomist.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__