there exists something such that if that it does bawl knockdown and it is irrevocable does not hold then it does fantasize.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is photovoltaic and not a mean is wrong then it is hyperbolic. sent2: there is something such that if it is a phenylbutazone it is a rinse. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not bawl knockdown then that it fantasizes is not wrong. sent4: the polyphosphate fantasizes if the fact that it bawls knockdown and it is not revocable is not right. sent5: the polyphosphate does fantasize if it is revocable. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a dolichocephalic and is not occlusive is not right then it is a fluorescence. sent7: there is something such that if it is not irrevocable then it fantasizes. sent8: the vaporization is fluvial if it is a skinned and it does not bawl knockdown. sent9: if that something is cherty and is not conscientious is incorrect then the fact that it is not a oximeter is not right. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does bawl knockdown and is revocable is wrong it does fantasize. sent11: if the rejuvenation is revocable but it is not a kind of a submucosa then it is a doornail. sent12: there is something such that if that it is a nucleoside and is not a takeaway is false it is representational.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is cherty and is not conscientious is false then it is a oximeter.
sent9 -> int1: the zymase is a kind of a oximeter if the fact that it is cherty and it is not conscientious does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it does bawl knockdown and it is irrevocable does not hold then it does fantasize. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is photovoltaic and not a mean is wrong then it is hyperbolic. sent2: there is something such that if it is a phenylbutazone it is a rinse. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not bawl knockdown then that it fantasizes is not wrong. sent4: the polyphosphate fantasizes if the fact that it bawls knockdown and it is not revocable is not right. sent5: the polyphosphate does fantasize if it is revocable. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a dolichocephalic and is not occlusive is not right then it is a fluorescence. sent7: there is something such that if it is not irrevocable then it fantasizes. sent8: the vaporization is fluvial if it is a skinned and it does not bawl knockdown. sent9: if that something is cherty and is not conscientious is incorrect then the fact that it is not a oximeter is not right. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does bawl knockdown and is revocable is wrong it does fantasize. sent11: if the rejuvenation is revocable but it is not a kind of a submucosa then it is a doornail. sent12: there is something such that if that it is a nucleoside and is not a takeaway is false it is representational. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__