there is something such that if it is asclepiadaceous then that it is apologetic and it is a misfire is not right.
sent1: something is not a kind of a Diderot but it quintuples Mallarme if it is acidotic. sent2: there exists something such that if it is adenoidal that that it does google and it hums dastard is right does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it quintuples HS2 then the fact that it does not surpass and hums pennyroyal is not correct. sent4: there is something such that if it is adhesive that it is a kind of non-confident thing that is a stopover is false. sent5: that something is not a plowman and is a kind of a napoleon is not correct if the fact that it hums stereoscope is correct. sent6: if something is asclepiadaceous then that it is apologetic and it misfires is wrong. sent7: the fact that something is unapologetic and it is a misfire is wrong if it is asclepiadaceous. sent8: there is something such that if it is an apocalypse then it is not a Trumbull but unresponsive. sent9: there exists something such that if it is impolitic that it is not a kind of a Aldebaran and quintuples Tiepolo is incorrect. sent10: there exists something such that if it is strategics then it is non-lacrimal thing that is not non-iridic.
sent6 -> int1: if the Saracen is asclepiadaceous then that it is not unapologetic and is a kind of a misfire does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does hum stereoscope then the fact that it is not a plowman but a napoleon is false.
sent5 -> int2: if the MArch hums stereoscope that it is not a kind of a plowman and is a napoleon does not hold.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is asclepiadaceous then that it is apologetic and it is a misfire is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a Diderot but it quintuples Mallarme if it is acidotic. sent2: there exists something such that if it is adenoidal that that it does google and it hums dastard is right does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it quintuples HS2 then the fact that it does not surpass and hums pennyroyal is not correct. sent4: there is something such that if it is adhesive that it is a kind of non-confident thing that is a stopover is false. sent5: that something is not a plowman and is a kind of a napoleon is not correct if the fact that it hums stereoscope is correct. sent6: if something is asclepiadaceous then that it is apologetic and it misfires is wrong. sent7: the fact that something is unapologetic and it is a misfire is wrong if it is asclepiadaceous. sent8: there is something such that if it is an apocalypse then it is not a Trumbull but unresponsive. sent9: there exists something such that if it is impolitic that it is not a kind of a Aldebaran and quintuples Tiepolo is incorrect. sent10: there exists something such that if it is strategics then it is non-lacrimal thing that is not non-iridic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the Saracen is asclepiadaceous then that it is not unapologetic and is a kind of a misfire does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__