the unforgettableness does not occur.
sent1: the non-figurativeness and/or the grasping cotoneaster occurs. sent2: the bolt does not occur and/or the archivalness does not occur if the sputtering does not occur. sent3: the celioscopy occurs. sent4: that the Rwandan does not occur but the devotion occurs is wrong if the reconsideration does not occur. sent5: if that the scandal occurs and the acneiformness happens is false the boycott does not occur. sent6: that the bolt happens and/or the archivalness does not occur hold. sent7: if the impreciseness does not occur then the glazing apar does not occur. sent8: that both the worseness and the reconsideration happens is caused by that the grasping hemostat does not occur. sent9: that the bolting does not occur and/or the archivalness does not occur yields that the unforgettableness happens. sent10: the worseness but not the reconsideration happens if the grasping hemostat occurs. sent11: either the bolting or the non-archivalness or both happens if the fact that the sputtering does not occur is not wrong. sent12: if the reconsideration occurs that either the devotion does not occur or the Rwandan occurs or both is not true. sent13: the sputtering does not occur. sent14: that the bolting does not occur brings about the unforgettableness. sent15: if the fact that not the Rwandanness but the devotion occurs does not hold the burlesque does not occur. sent16: if the burlesqueness does not occur then the non-unforgettableness and the sputtering happens. sent17: the non-generationalness or the non-aphasicness or both occurs. sent18: that the glazing apar does not occur triggers either the grasping jollity or the philhellenicness or both. sent19: if the osteotomy does not occur then that both the scandal and the acneiformness happens is false. sent20: that the wariness does not occur and the osteotomy does not occur is caused by the Laputanness. sent21: that the grasping hemostat does not occur is triggered by that the boycotting but not the training happens. sent22: that the burlesqueness does not occur prevents that the unforgettableness happens. sent23: the grasping hemostat happens and the training occurs if the boycotting does not occur.
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the bolting does not occur and/or the archivalness does not occur.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the grasping spoil does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the unforgettableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-figurativeness and/or the grasping cotoneaster occurs. sent2: the bolt does not occur and/or the archivalness does not occur if the sputtering does not occur. sent3: the celioscopy occurs. sent4: that the Rwandan does not occur but the devotion occurs is wrong if the reconsideration does not occur. sent5: if that the scandal occurs and the acneiformness happens is false the boycott does not occur. sent6: that the bolt happens and/or the archivalness does not occur hold. sent7: if the impreciseness does not occur then the glazing apar does not occur. sent8: that both the worseness and the reconsideration happens is caused by that the grasping hemostat does not occur. sent9: that the bolting does not occur and/or the archivalness does not occur yields that the unforgettableness happens. sent10: the worseness but not the reconsideration happens if the grasping hemostat occurs. sent11: either the bolting or the non-archivalness or both happens if the fact that the sputtering does not occur is not wrong. sent12: if the reconsideration occurs that either the devotion does not occur or the Rwandan occurs or both is not true. sent13: the sputtering does not occur. sent14: that the bolting does not occur brings about the unforgettableness. sent15: if the fact that not the Rwandanness but the devotion occurs does not hold the burlesque does not occur. sent16: if the burlesqueness does not occur then the non-unforgettableness and the sputtering happens. sent17: the non-generationalness or the non-aphasicness or both occurs. sent18: that the glazing apar does not occur triggers either the grasping jollity or the philhellenicness or both. sent19: if the osteotomy does not occur then that both the scandal and the acneiformness happens is false. sent20: that the wariness does not occur and the osteotomy does not occur is caused by the Laputanness. sent21: that the grasping hemostat does not occur is triggered by that the boycotting but not the training happens. sent22: that the burlesqueness does not occur prevents that the unforgettableness happens. sent23: the grasping hemostat happens and the training occurs if the boycotting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the bolting does not occur and/or the archivalness does not occur.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__