that there exists something such that if it is not photovoltaic then it is a prostate and/or it is not hieratic is not right.
sent1: if the facility is not a Bushnell then it is not non-photovoltaic and/or it is not a Taurus. sent2: something that does not subtilize animatism does subtilize baseline and/or does not skip Calluna. sent3: the voider is either a prostate or not hieratic or both if it is not non-photovoltaic. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not adjudicative then it does subtilize Tarawa and/or it is tympanic. sent5: if the wiggler is not a kind of an abstraction then it is a kind of a metalworking or it is prostate or both. sent6: the airbrake does glom Nancy and/or it is unnoticeable if it is prostate. sent7: if something is non-photovoltaic it is a prostate and/or it is not a kind of a hieratic. sent8: if something is not identical then it does glom element and/or it is not a metalworking. sent9: there exists something such that if that it does not skip kolkhoznik is not false then it is a vulgarian and/or not a palmature. sent10: either something is responsible or it is a venule or both if it is not noticeable. sent11: if the voider is accordant then it is a kind of a cofounder and/or it is not a re. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not subtilize SoHo either it is nonjudgmental or it does skip Heloise or both.
sent7 -> int1: if the voider is non-photovoltaic it is either not non-prostate or not a hieratic or both.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not subtilize animatism it does subtilize baseline or does not skip Calluna or both.
sent2 -> int2: if the bestseller does not subtilize animatism it subtilizes baseline or it does not skip Calluna or both.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not photovoltaic then it is a prostate and/or it is not hieratic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the facility is not a Bushnell then it is not non-photovoltaic and/or it is not a Taurus. sent2: something that does not subtilize animatism does subtilize baseline and/or does not skip Calluna. sent3: the voider is either a prostate or not hieratic or both if it is not non-photovoltaic. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not adjudicative then it does subtilize Tarawa and/or it is tympanic. sent5: if the wiggler is not a kind of an abstraction then it is a kind of a metalworking or it is prostate or both. sent6: the airbrake does glom Nancy and/or it is unnoticeable if it is prostate. sent7: if something is non-photovoltaic it is a prostate and/or it is not a kind of a hieratic. sent8: if something is not identical then it does glom element and/or it is not a metalworking. sent9: there exists something such that if that it does not skip kolkhoznik is not false then it is a vulgarian and/or not a palmature. sent10: either something is responsible or it is a venule or both if it is not noticeable. sent11: if the voider is accordant then it is a kind of a cofounder and/or it is not a re. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not subtilize SoHo either it is nonjudgmental or it does skip Heloise or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the voider is non-photovoltaic it is either not non-prostate or not a hieratic or both.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__