the fact that there is something such that if it does effect Mamet then that it is a neologism and it is not chancrous is not true is false.
sent1: something is a neologism but it is not chancrous if that it effects Mamet hold. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a neologism that is not chancrous is false if it does effect Mamet. sent3: that that the flagellate is tubal but it is not bismuthic is not correct is not wrong if it is chancrous. sent4: if the mistral does effect Mamet it is a neologism and it is non-chancrous. sent5: if something does effect Mamet the fact that it is both a neologism and chancrous is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it does effect Mamet then it is both a neologism and non-chancrous. sent7: the fact that the mistral dissembles contemporaneity and is not an esplanade is not right if it is Corsican.
sent2 -> int1: that the mistral is a neologism but not chancrous does not hold if it effects Mamet.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does effect Mamet then that it is a neologism and it is not chancrous is not true is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a neologism but it is not chancrous if that it effects Mamet hold. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a neologism that is not chancrous is false if it does effect Mamet. sent3: that that the flagellate is tubal but it is not bismuthic is not correct is not wrong if it is chancrous. sent4: if the mistral does effect Mamet it is a neologism and it is non-chancrous. sent5: if something does effect Mamet the fact that it is both a neologism and chancrous is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it does effect Mamet then it is both a neologism and non-chancrous. sent7: the fact that the mistral dissembles contemporaneity and is not an esplanade is not right if it is Corsican. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: that the mistral is a neologism but not chancrous does not hold if it effects Mamet.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__