that the animal is a megaphone and is not quadratic is not true.
sent1: if the headpin is a Dior then the foryml emblazons nonfiction. sent2: the fact that that something is both a megaphone and not quadratic hold is wrong if it is non-angiocarpic. sent3: that the hygroscope is not a kind of a beebalm and it is not an exposition does not hold. sent4: the belt is not unsupportive. sent5: if the defoliator is not quadratic the animal is a megaphone but it is not a quadratic. sent6: that the mullet is not a megaphone but it is a kind of an exposition does not hold if the foryml does emblazon nonfiction. sent7: if the belt is not unsupportive that it does not dash and does not emblazon purchase is not true. sent8: if something is not angiocarpic that it is loamless and is a Chadian is false. sent9: the hygroscope is not angiocarpic if that it is not a kind of a beebalm and it is not an exposition does not hold. sent10: if that the hygroscope is loamless and it is a Chadian does not hold the defoliator is not a quadratic. sent11: if the mullet is not angiocarpic the fact that the defoliator is a beebalm and it is a kind of a quadratic is not correct.
sent8 -> int1: if the hygroscope is not angiocarpic then the fact that it is loamless and it is Chadian is wrong.; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: the hygroscope is not angiocarpic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the hygroscope is not loamy but Chadian is not incorrect is not right.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the defoliator is not a quadratic.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the animal is a megaphone but it is non-quadratic is incorrect.
sent2 -> int5: the fact that the animal is a megaphone but not a quadratic is incorrect if it is not angiocarpic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the animal is a megaphone and is not quadratic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the headpin is a Dior then the foryml emblazons nonfiction. sent2: the fact that that something is both a megaphone and not quadratic hold is wrong if it is non-angiocarpic. sent3: that the hygroscope is not a kind of a beebalm and it is not an exposition does not hold. sent4: the belt is not unsupportive. sent5: if the defoliator is not quadratic the animal is a megaphone but it is not a quadratic. sent6: that the mullet is not a megaphone but it is a kind of an exposition does not hold if the foryml does emblazon nonfiction. sent7: if the belt is not unsupportive that it does not dash and does not emblazon purchase is not true. sent8: if something is not angiocarpic that it is loamless and is a Chadian is false. sent9: the hygroscope is not angiocarpic if that it is not a kind of a beebalm and it is not an exposition does not hold. sent10: if that the hygroscope is loamless and it is a Chadian does not hold the defoliator is not a quadratic. sent11: if the mullet is not angiocarpic the fact that the defoliator is a beebalm and it is a kind of a quadratic is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the hygroscope is not angiocarpic then the fact that it is loamless and it is Chadian is wrong.; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: the hygroscope is not angiocarpic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the hygroscope is not loamy but Chadian is not incorrect is not right.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the defoliator is not a quadratic.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__