the fact that there is something such that if that it is inexcusable and coherent is incorrect then it is not a dying is incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that something is both inexcusable and coherent is not correct it is not a dying. sent2: the booger is a safe-deposit if that it is both a dacite and a Acadian is wrong. sent3: if the fact that something is associational and a chemistry is incorrect it is not common. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is clinker-built and is reparable does not hold then it is nonexploratory.
sent1 -> int1: the booger does not die if that it is inexcusable thing that is coherent does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is inexcusable and coherent is incorrect then it is not a dying is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is both inexcusable and coherent is not correct it is not a dying. sent2: the booger is a safe-deposit if that it is both a dacite and a Acadian is wrong. sent3: if the fact that something is associational and a chemistry is incorrect it is not common. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is clinker-built and is reparable does not hold then it is nonexploratory. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the booger does not die if that it is inexcusable thing that is coherent does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__