the elastance and the transaction occurs.
sent1: that the erection happens and the transaction happens is brought about by the scholarlyness. sent2: the fact that the fact that the wax happens and the countermeasure occurs is not wrong is wrong. sent3: if the overriding radiophotography does not occur then the ableism happens. sent4: the elastance occurs if the acronymicness does not occur. sent5: the invigilation does not occur. sent6: if the high-low does not occur that both the corruptness and the lineman happens does not hold. sent7: the amnesticness does not occur if the Swedishness but not the overriding coelogyne happens. sent8: if that both the overriding Miro and the overriding controlling occurs is not correct the unscholarliness does not occur. sent9: if the erection does not occur then the fact that the acronymicness does not occur and the brazening mycotoxin does not occur is not true. sent10: that the Swedishness does not occur and the augury happens is wrong if the overriding coelogyne does not occur. sent11: if the overriding Miro does not occur then the fact that both the scaling and the unscholarliness occurs does not hold. sent12: the maxillofacialness occurs. sent13: if the brazening intransitivity does not occur then that the deserts occurs and the shambles happens is not right. sent14: that the countermeasure does not occur and the fartlek does not occur triggers the non-Benedictineness. sent15: if the amnesticness does not occur then the fact that the elastance occurs and the transaction occurs is incorrect. sent16: the non-Benedictineness brings about that the brazening Albee occurs but the slugging cystine does not occur. sent17: the overriding controlling does not occur or the invigilation does not occur or both if the overriding sticker happens. sent18: if that the amnesticness but not the overriding coelogyne occurs is not true the acronymicness does not occur. sent19: that the scaling occurs and the brazening mycotoxin happens is incorrect. sent20: the fact that the brachiation happens is not wrong. sent21: the fact that the brazening mycotoxin occurs hold if the fact that both the non-Swedishness and the augury happens does not hold. sent22: the spiraling happens. sent23: if that the scaling and the brazening mycotoxin happens is not right the brazening mycotoxin does not occur. sent24: if the fact that the invigilation does not occur is not false the fact that both the overriding Miro and the overriding controlling occurs is incorrect. sent25: that the slugging cystine does not occur triggers that the overriding sticker and the Rock occurs. sent26: the twitching does not occur. sent27: that the countermeasure does not occur and the fartlek does not occur is brought about by that the Hebrideanness occurs. sent28: the fact that both the discomycetousness and the puerperalness happens is incorrect. sent29: the brazening presbytery does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amnesticness occurs but the overriding coelogyne does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the overriding coelogyne does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that both the non-Swedishness and the augury happens does not hold.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the brazening mycotoxin happens.; sent23 & sent19 -> int4: the brazening mycotoxin does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the amnesticness but not the overriding coelogyne occurs does not hold.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the acronymicness does not occur.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the elastance happens.; sent24 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the overriding Miro occurs and the overriding controlling happens does not hold.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the unscholarliness does not occur.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: both the erection and the transaction happens.; int11 -> int12: the transaction occurs.; int8 & int12 -> hypothesis;
that the elastance and the transaction happens is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the elastance and the transaction occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the erection happens and the transaction happens is brought about by the scholarlyness. sent2: the fact that the fact that the wax happens and the countermeasure occurs is not wrong is wrong. sent3: if the overriding radiophotography does not occur then the ableism happens. sent4: the elastance occurs if the acronymicness does not occur. sent5: the invigilation does not occur. sent6: if the high-low does not occur that both the corruptness and the lineman happens does not hold. sent7: the amnesticness does not occur if the Swedishness but not the overriding coelogyne happens. sent8: if that both the overriding Miro and the overriding controlling occurs is not correct the unscholarliness does not occur. sent9: if the erection does not occur then the fact that the acronymicness does not occur and the brazening mycotoxin does not occur is not true. sent10: that the Swedishness does not occur and the augury happens is wrong if the overriding coelogyne does not occur. sent11: if the overriding Miro does not occur then the fact that both the scaling and the unscholarliness occurs does not hold. sent12: the maxillofacialness occurs. sent13: if the brazening intransitivity does not occur then that the deserts occurs and the shambles happens is not right. sent14: that the countermeasure does not occur and the fartlek does not occur triggers the non-Benedictineness. sent15: if the amnesticness does not occur then the fact that the elastance occurs and the transaction occurs is incorrect. sent16: the non-Benedictineness brings about that the brazening Albee occurs but the slugging cystine does not occur. sent17: the overriding controlling does not occur or the invigilation does not occur or both if the overriding sticker happens. sent18: if that the amnesticness but not the overriding coelogyne occurs is not true the acronymicness does not occur. sent19: that the scaling occurs and the brazening mycotoxin happens is incorrect. sent20: the fact that the brachiation happens is not wrong. sent21: the fact that the brazening mycotoxin occurs hold if the fact that both the non-Swedishness and the augury happens does not hold. sent22: the spiraling happens. sent23: if that the scaling and the brazening mycotoxin happens is not right the brazening mycotoxin does not occur. sent24: if the fact that the invigilation does not occur is not false the fact that both the overriding Miro and the overriding controlling occurs is incorrect. sent25: that the slugging cystine does not occur triggers that the overriding sticker and the Rock occurs. sent26: the twitching does not occur. sent27: that the countermeasure does not occur and the fartlek does not occur is brought about by that the Hebrideanness occurs. sent28: the fact that both the discomycetousness and the puerperalness happens is incorrect. sent29: the brazening presbytery does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amnesticness occurs but the overriding coelogyne does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the overriding coelogyne does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that both the non-Swedishness and the augury happens does not hold.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the brazening mycotoxin happens.; sent23 & sent19 -> int4: the brazening mycotoxin does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the amnesticness but not the overriding coelogyne occurs does not hold.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the acronymicness does not occur.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the elastance happens.; sent24 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the overriding Miro occurs and the overriding controlling happens does not hold.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the unscholarliness does not occur.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: both the erection and the transaction happens.; int11 -> int12: the transaction occurs.; int8 & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__