the fact that that the dating sir occurs triggers that the postwarness occurs is not right.
sent1: the fact that the impoundment is caused by that the thrum does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: that the Reformation occurs and the uttering hackle happens prevents that the joyousness happens. sent3: the suddenness does not occur if the scurfiness does not occur. sent4: if the sousing occurs and the dating sir happens that the acting does not occur is right. sent5: the dating hyperadrenocorticism does not occur if the nonconformity happens and the vacationing happens. sent6: the fact that the dating instigator does not occur hold. sent7: the unveiling Exacum occurs. sent8: that the LASIK happens is triggered by that the Bantoidness does not occur. sent9: the uttering Cyperus does not occur. sent10: that the thrum does not occur hold if the acting does not occur. sent11: the postwarness happens if the impoundment occurs. sent12: the souse occurs if the unveiling Exacum occurs. sent13: that the personification occurs is brought about by that the pumping does not occur.
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the sousing occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the dating sir happens hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the souse and the dating sir happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the acting does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the thrum does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the impoundment occurs.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the postwarness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the dating sir occurs triggers that the postwarness occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the impoundment is caused by that the thrum does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: that the Reformation occurs and the uttering hackle happens prevents that the joyousness happens. sent3: the suddenness does not occur if the scurfiness does not occur. sent4: if the sousing occurs and the dating sir happens that the acting does not occur is right. sent5: the dating hyperadrenocorticism does not occur if the nonconformity happens and the vacationing happens. sent6: the fact that the dating instigator does not occur hold. sent7: the unveiling Exacum occurs. sent8: that the LASIK happens is triggered by that the Bantoidness does not occur. sent9: the uttering Cyperus does not occur. sent10: that the thrum does not occur hold if the acting does not occur. sent11: the postwarness happens if the impoundment occurs. sent12: the souse occurs if the unveiling Exacum occurs. sent13: that the personification occurs is brought about by that the pumping does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the sousing occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the dating sir happens hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the souse and the dating sir happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the acting does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the thrum does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the impoundment occurs.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the postwarness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__