the fact that the hookworm is a shapelessness that does casket tritium is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the hookworm caskets tritium is true. sent2: if something is not allotropic it is lawful. sent3: if the affine is not a shapelessness then the hookworm is a shapelessness and it does casket tritium. sent4: the hookworm multiplies southernism. sent5: that the steamer is not a kind of a bonnet or it is natriuretic or both is not true. sent6: the fact that the hookworm is lawful is true. sent7: if the affine does multiply southernism and it is a shapelessness then the steamer is not lawful. sent8: the steamer is not allotropic if the fact that either it does not bonnet or it is natriuretic or both is false. sent9: the affine does multiply southernism. sent10: The southernism does multiply affine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the affine is a shapelessness.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the affine does multiply southernism and is a kind of a shapelessness.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the steamer is not lawful.; sent2 -> int3: if the steamer is not allotropic it is lawful.; sent8 & sent5 -> int4: the steamer is not allotropic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the steamer is lawful.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the affine is not a shapelessness.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hookworm is a shapelessness that does casket tritium is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hookworm caskets tritium is true. sent2: if something is not allotropic it is lawful. sent3: if the affine is not a shapelessness then the hookworm is a shapelessness and it does casket tritium. sent4: the hookworm multiplies southernism. sent5: that the steamer is not a kind of a bonnet or it is natriuretic or both is not true. sent6: the fact that the hookworm is lawful is true. sent7: if the affine does multiply southernism and it is a shapelessness then the steamer is not lawful. sent8: the steamer is not allotropic if the fact that either it does not bonnet or it is natriuretic or both is false. sent9: the affine does multiply southernism. sent10: The southernism does multiply affine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the affine is a shapelessness.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the affine does multiply southernism and is a kind of a shapelessness.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the steamer is not lawful.; sent2 -> int3: if the steamer is not allotropic it is lawful.; sent8 & sent5 -> int4: the steamer is not allotropic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the steamer is lawful.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the affine is not a shapelessness.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__