the watch occurs.
sent1: the ESR occurs if the Cyprianness occurs. sent2: the electroshock and the abducentness occurs. sent3: the torturing Malva does not occur and the clinkering occurs. sent4: that the resettling caroler does not occur prevents the non-semiterrestrialness. sent5: the resettling caroler does not occur if the interdicting pyroscope does not occur and the Cyprianness does not occur. sent6: if that the semiterrestrialness occurs hold then the episode happens. sent7: the electroshock prevents the non-biogeographicness. sent8: if the biogeographicness happens the episode does not occur and the Afghaniness does not occur. sent9: that not the torturing Malva but the clinker happens leads to that the interdicting pyroscope does not occur.
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the interdicting pyroscope does not occur is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cyprianness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the interdicting pyroscope does not occur and the Cyprianness does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the resettling caroler does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the semiterrestrialness happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the episode occurs is true.; sent2 -> int6: the electroshock occurs.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the biogeographicness happens.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the episode does not occur and the Afghaniness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the episode does not occur.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the Cyprianness occurs.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the ESR occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the watch occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the ESR occurs if the Cyprianness occurs. sent2: the electroshock and the abducentness occurs. sent3: the torturing Malva does not occur and the clinkering occurs. sent4: that the resettling caroler does not occur prevents the non-semiterrestrialness. sent5: the resettling caroler does not occur if the interdicting pyroscope does not occur and the Cyprianness does not occur. sent6: if that the semiterrestrialness occurs hold then the episode happens. sent7: the electroshock prevents the non-biogeographicness. sent8: if the biogeographicness happens the episode does not occur and the Afghaniness does not occur. sent9: that not the torturing Malva but the clinker happens leads to that the interdicting pyroscope does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the interdicting pyroscope does not occur is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cyprianness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the interdicting pyroscope does not occur and the Cyprianness does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the resettling caroler does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the semiterrestrialness happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the episode occurs is true.; sent2 -> int6: the electroshock occurs.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the biogeographicness happens.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the episode does not occur and the Afghaniness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the episode does not occur.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the Cyprianness occurs.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the ESR occurs.; __UNKNOWN__