the palomino is monotypic.
sent1: the sampan is a bridal if there exists something such that the fact that it does not crochet Falconidae and is not a kind of a careerist is incorrect. sent2: that something is not monotypic and is not a bridal does not hold if it is saprobic. sent3: if there is something such that it is a bridal and/or it is saprobic the palomino is not monotypic. sent4: there is something such that that it does not crochet Falconidae and is not a careerist is not right.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the sampan is a bridal is true.; int1 -> int2: either the sampan is a kind of a bridal or it is saprobic or both.; int2 -> int3: either something is a bridal or it is saprobic or both.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the palomino is monotypic.
sent2 -> int4: if the sampan is saprobic then that it is not monotypic and it is not a bridal is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the palomino is monotypic. ; $context$ = sent1: the sampan is a bridal if there exists something such that the fact that it does not crochet Falconidae and is not a kind of a careerist is incorrect. sent2: that something is not monotypic and is not a bridal does not hold if it is saprobic. sent3: if there is something such that it is a bridal and/or it is saprobic the palomino is not monotypic. sent4: there is something such that that it does not crochet Falconidae and is not a careerist is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the sampan is a bridal is true.; int1 -> int2: either the sampan is a kind of a bridal or it is saprobic or both.; int2 -> int3: either something is a bridal or it is saprobic or both.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__