the bevatron is a unaffectedness.
sent1: the bevatron is not a unaffectedness if there exists something such that the fact that it does comfort Occam is not false. sent2: the fact that the fact that something does not reflectorize drop but it comforts Occam hold does not hold if it is not biogenic. sent3: the bevatron is not a unaffectedness if there is something such that the fact that it does reflectorize drop and does not comfort Occam is not right. sent4: if the stacker is a psychopathology then that the fugu reflectorizes drop and does comfort Occam is incorrect. sent5: if the stacker is non-biogenic it does not reflectorize drop and it comforts Occam. sent6: if the stacker is not a kind of a overlordship but it is a technique it is not biogenic. sent7: something does reflectorize drop and does not comfort Occam. sent8: there is something such that that it does reflectorize drop and comforts Occam is false. sent9: the burgrave is not a psychopathology if the fact that the stacker does not reflectorize drop or it is a psychopathology or both is not incorrect. sent10: the parallel is not biogenic if the burgrave is both not a technique and not a overlordship. sent11: the stacker is not a overlordship but it is a technique if it is not bureaucratic. sent12: if something is bureaucratic it is not a technique and it is not a kind of a overlordship. sent13: the burgrave is a vanillin. sent14: the stacker is a kind of a psychopathology if the burgrave is a kind of a vanillin. sent15: either something is a kind of a unaffectedness or it is a kind of a vanillin or both if the fact that it is not a psychopathology is correct. sent16: the fugu is a vanillin. sent17: everything is bureaucratic. sent18: the fact that the fugu does reflectorize drop and it comforts Occam is not correct. sent19: if the stacker is a kind of a psychopathology then that the fugu reflectorizes drop and does not comfort Occam is not true. sent20: something is a kind of a vanillin and it is a kind of a unaffectedness if it is not a psychopathology.
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the stacker is a psychopathology.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the fugu does reflectorize drop and does not comfort Occam is not right.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does reflectorize drop and it does not comfort Occam is not right.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bevatron is a unaffectedness is not false.
sent15 -> int4: if the burgrave is not a psychopathology either it is a unaffectedness or it is a kind of a vanillin or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the bevatron is a unaffectedness. ; $context$ = sent1: the bevatron is not a unaffectedness if there exists something such that the fact that it does comfort Occam is not false. sent2: the fact that the fact that something does not reflectorize drop but it comforts Occam hold does not hold if it is not biogenic. sent3: the bevatron is not a unaffectedness if there is something such that the fact that it does reflectorize drop and does not comfort Occam is not right. sent4: if the stacker is a psychopathology then that the fugu reflectorizes drop and does comfort Occam is incorrect. sent5: if the stacker is non-biogenic it does not reflectorize drop and it comforts Occam. sent6: if the stacker is not a kind of a overlordship but it is a technique it is not biogenic. sent7: something does reflectorize drop and does not comfort Occam. sent8: there is something such that that it does reflectorize drop and comforts Occam is false. sent9: the burgrave is not a psychopathology if the fact that the stacker does not reflectorize drop or it is a psychopathology or both is not incorrect. sent10: the parallel is not biogenic if the burgrave is both not a technique and not a overlordship. sent11: the stacker is not a overlordship but it is a technique if it is not bureaucratic. sent12: if something is bureaucratic it is not a technique and it is not a kind of a overlordship. sent13: the burgrave is a vanillin. sent14: the stacker is a kind of a psychopathology if the burgrave is a kind of a vanillin. sent15: either something is a kind of a unaffectedness or it is a kind of a vanillin or both if the fact that it is not a psychopathology is correct. sent16: the fugu is a vanillin. sent17: everything is bureaucratic. sent18: the fact that the fugu does reflectorize drop and it comforts Occam is not correct. sent19: if the stacker is a kind of a psychopathology then that the fugu reflectorizes drop and does not comfort Occam is not true. sent20: something is a kind of a vanillin and it is a kind of a unaffectedness if it is not a psychopathology. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the stacker is a psychopathology.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the fugu does reflectorize drop and does not comfort Occam is not right.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does reflectorize drop and it does not comfort Occam is not right.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__