there is something such that if it is bronchiolar it is not a salivation.
sent1: that the allies does not push neuron and is haemophilic is not correct if it is not a kind of a calceus. sent2: the allies is haemophilic if the fact that that it is not perithelial and it is not haemophilic is right is incorrect. sent3: the marmalade is not haemophilic. sent4: if the allies is non-haemophilic that the neuron is not a salivation and it does not push neuron is incorrect. sent5: the allies does not contemplate healthcare if it is bronchiolar and it is a kind of a salivation. sent6: that the allies is non-perithelial and it is not haemophilic is not right. sent7: the fact that the allies does not push neuron if the allies does not contemplate healthcare hold. sent8: the allies is not a calceus. sent9: something is bronchiolar if the fact that it is not a salivation and it does not push neuron is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the allies is bronchiolar.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allies is a salivation.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the allies is bronchiolar and is a salivation.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the allies does not contemplate healthcare.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the allies does not push neuron hold.; sent2 & sent6 -> int4: the allies is haemophilic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the allies does not push neuron but it is haemophilic.; sent1 & sent8 -> int6: that the allies does not push neuron but it is haemophilic is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the allies is not a salivation.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: if the allies is bronchiolar then it is not a kind of a salivation.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the neuron does contemplate healthcare.
sent9 -> int10: that the neuron is bronchiolar is not incorrect if that it is not a salivation and it does not push neuron is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is bronchiolar it is not a salivation. ; $context$ = sent1: that the allies does not push neuron and is haemophilic is not correct if it is not a kind of a calceus. sent2: the allies is haemophilic if the fact that that it is not perithelial and it is not haemophilic is right is incorrect. sent3: the marmalade is not haemophilic. sent4: if the allies is non-haemophilic that the neuron is not a salivation and it does not push neuron is incorrect. sent5: the allies does not contemplate healthcare if it is bronchiolar and it is a kind of a salivation. sent6: that the allies is non-perithelial and it is not haemophilic is not right. sent7: the fact that the allies does not push neuron if the allies does not contemplate healthcare hold. sent8: the allies is not a calceus. sent9: something is bronchiolar if the fact that it is not a salivation and it does not push neuron is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the allies is bronchiolar.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allies is a salivation.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the allies is bronchiolar and is a salivation.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the allies does not contemplate healthcare.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the allies does not push neuron hold.; sent2 & sent6 -> int4: the allies is haemophilic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the allies does not push neuron but it is haemophilic.; sent1 & sent8 -> int6: that the allies does not push neuron but it is haemophilic is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the allies is not a salivation.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: if the allies is bronchiolar then it is not a kind of a salivation.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__