the part-owner does truck deep-sea.
sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a Citrullus and is not a kind of an unpopularity is false if it decamps. sent2: if the dreamer decamps then the censer limits. sent3: the lingerie is a Citrullus if the censer is not a Citrullus. sent4: the part-owner is a instep. sent5: the part-owner is a instep if it rolls fiber. sent6: that the fact that the rathskeller is not an unpopularity and does not roll videotape does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the dreamer does not imbricate and is not a Citrullus is wrong if it is a instep. sent8: if that something is not an unpopularity and not a limit is wrong then it is a instep. sent9: if the part-owner does decamp the fact that the censer decamp is not incorrect. sent10: if the jellyleaf is a limit then the part-owner does decamp. sent11: something that is a Citrullus is an unpopularity. sent12: if the dreamer is a Citrullus then it is an unpopularity. sent13: if the dreamer is a kind of an unpopularity then it decamps. sent14: the fact that the dreamer is a kind of a instep is not wrong. sent15: the censer is not a limit and it is not carnal if the fact that the lingerie is not a Budapest is right. sent16: if the dreamer is a instep then the fact that it does not imbricate and is a kind of a Citrullus is not true. sent17: something does not truck deep-sea and does not decamp if it is not an unpopularity. sent18: the censer is an unpopularity. sent19: if the fact that the dreamer does not imbricate and it is not a kind of a limit is incorrect that it is a instep is not incorrect. sent20: the part-owner does camber rotenone. sent21: the fact that the dreamer does not imbricate and is a Citrullus is not correct. sent22: if the censer is a limit then the part-owner does truck deep-sea. sent23: something that trucks deep-sea and is not a kind of a instep is a kind of a limit. sent24: if the censer is not a limit and it is non-carnal the part-owner is not a limit. sent25: something is an unpopularity if the fact that it does not imbricate and it is not a Citrullus is false.
sent25 -> int1: the dreamer is an unpopularity if the fact that it does not imbricate and is not a kind of a Citrullus does not hold.; sent7 & sent14 -> int2: that the dreamer does not imbricate and it is not a Citrullus is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dreamer is an unpopularity.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the dreamer decamps.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the censer is a kind of a limit.; int5 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the part-owner does not truck deep-sea is correct.
sent17 -> int6: the part-owner does not truck deep-sea and it does not decamp if it is not an unpopularity.;
$hypothesis$ = the part-owner does truck deep-sea. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a Citrullus and is not a kind of an unpopularity is false if it decamps. sent2: if the dreamer decamps then the censer limits. sent3: the lingerie is a Citrullus if the censer is not a Citrullus. sent4: the part-owner is a instep. sent5: the part-owner is a instep if it rolls fiber. sent6: that the fact that the rathskeller is not an unpopularity and does not roll videotape does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the dreamer does not imbricate and is not a Citrullus is wrong if it is a instep. sent8: if that something is not an unpopularity and not a limit is wrong then it is a instep. sent9: if the part-owner does decamp the fact that the censer decamp is not incorrect. sent10: if the jellyleaf is a limit then the part-owner does decamp. sent11: something that is a Citrullus is an unpopularity. sent12: if the dreamer is a Citrullus then it is an unpopularity. sent13: if the dreamer is a kind of an unpopularity then it decamps. sent14: the fact that the dreamer is a kind of a instep is not wrong. sent15: the censer is not a limit and it is not carnal if the fact that the lingerie is not a Budapest is right. sent16: if the dreamer is a instep then the fact that it does not imbricate and is a kind of a Citrullus is not true. sent17: something does not truck deep-sea and does not decamp if it is not an unpopularity. sent18: the censer is an unpopularity. sent19: if the fact that the dreamer does not imbricate and it is not a kind of a limit is incorrect that it is a instep is not incorrect. sent20: the part-owner does camber rotenone. sent21: the fact that the dreamer does not imbricate and is a Citrullus is not correct. sent22: if the censer is a limit then the part-owner does truck deep-sea. sent23: something that trucks deep-sea and is not a kind of a instep is a kind of a limit. sent24: if the censer is not a limit and it is non-carnal the part-owner is not a limit. sent25: something is an unpopularity if the fact that it does not imbricate and it is not a Citrullus is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 -> int1: the dreamer is an unpopularity if the fact that it does not imbricate and is not a kind of a Citrullus does not hold.; sent7 & sent14 -> int2: that the dreamer does not imbricate and it is not a Citrullus is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dreamer is an unpopularity.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the dreamer decamps.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the censer is a kind of a limit.; int5 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__