that if the fact that the melanizing biochip happens is not false the archaisticness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the non-archaisticness is prevented by that the titillation but not the guarantee occurs. sent2: the austeniticness and the non-biblicalness occurs if that the titillation does not occur is not false. sent3: that the platyrrhine does not occur is right. sent4: the collation happens if the repining nymphet happens. sent5: if the platyrrhine does not occur the mercifulness and the enumerating happens. sent6: the blotting does not occur. sent7: that the singularizing batik but not the chairmanship occurs prevents that the blazing does not occur. sent8: both the melanizing tread and the dicotyledonousness happens. sent9: both the collocation and the non-morbilliformness happens. sent10: the singularizing weasel occurs. sent11: the dicotyledonousness occurs. sent12: the fudging occurs. sent13: that the singularizing hydrofoil and the melanizing tread happens brings about that the diamagnetism does not occur. sent14: if the breathing happens then the fact that the melanizing biochip does not occur is true. sent15: the discriminatoriness occurs. sent16: the guarantee does not occur if the mercifulness occurs and the singularizing cambric happens. sent17: the breathing happens if both the austeniticness and the non-biblicalness happens. sent18: that the repining contralto occurs but the singularizing Microstomus does not occur causes that the dicotyledonousness occurs. sent19: that the alternatingness does not occur is not wrong. sent20: the extinction does not occur. sent21: the reconnaissance occurs. sent22: the singularizing weasel occurs if the asphalticness does not occur. sent23: both the chaplaincy and the Irishness occurs. sent24: if the congenericness happens but the spade does not occur the singularizing gabardine happens. sent25: the singularizing cambric occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the titillation does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the austeniticness but not the biblicalness happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the breathing occurs.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the melanizing biochip does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the melanizing biochip occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the titillation happens.; sent5 & sent3 -> int6: the mercifulness occurs and the enumerating happens.; int6 -> int7: the mercifulness occurs.; int7 & sent25 -> int8: both the mercifulness and the singularizing cambric happens.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: the guaranteeing does not occur.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the titillation but not the guaranteeing occurs.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the archaisticness occurs.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the melanizing biochip happens is not false the archaisticness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-archaisticness is prevented by that the titillation but not the guarantee occurs. sent2: the austeniticness and the non-biblicalness occurs if that the titillation does not occur is not false. sent3: that the platyrrhine does not occur is right. sent4: the collation happens if the repining nymphet happens. sent5: if the platyrrhine does not occur the mercifulness and the enumerating happens. sent6: the blotting does not occur. sent7: that the singularizing batik but not the chairmanship occurs prevents that the blazing does not occur. sent8: both the melanizing tread and the dicotyledonousness happens. sent9: both the collocation and the non-morbilliformness happens. sent10: the singularizing weasel occurs. sent11: the dicotyledonousness occurs. sent12: the fudging occurs. sent13: that the singularizing hydrofoil and the melanizing tread happens brings about that the diamagnetism does not occur. sent14: if the breathing happens then the fact that the melanizing biochip does not occur is true. sent15: the discriminatoriness occurs. sent16: the guarantee does not occur if the mercifulness occurs and the singularizing cambric happens. sent17: the breathing happens if both the austeniticness and the non-biblicalness happens. sent18: that the repining contralto occurs but the singularizing Microstomus does not occur causes that the dicotyledonousness occurs. sent19: that the alternatingness does not occur is not wrong. sent20: the extinction does not occur. sent21: the reconnaissance occurs. sent22: the singularizing weasel occurs if the asphalticness does not occur. sent23: both the chaplaincy and the Irishness occurs. sent24: if the congenericness happens but the spade does not occur the singularizing gabardine happens. sent25: the singularizing cambric occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the titillation does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the austeniticness but not the biblicalness happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the breathing occurs.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the melanizing biochip does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the melanizing biochip occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the titillation happens.; sent5 & sent3 -> int6: the mercifulness occurs and the enumerating happens.; int6 -> int7: the mercifulness occurs.; int7 & sent25 -> int8: both the mercifulness and the singularizing cambric happens.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: the guaranteeing does not occur.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the titillation but not the guaranteeing occurs.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the archaisticness occurs.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__