the fact that the fact that the Monegasque is auspicious and/or it wraps continuo is wrong is true.
sent1: that the pogonion does not wrap continuo but it arrives is not correct if the Monegasque does not wrap continuo. sent2: if the Monegasque is Palestinian then it is textile. sent3: that the Monegasque is not auspicious and it does not hunger eyeful does not hold. sent4: something is auspicious if the fact that it does not arrive and it is not textile does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that it is wifely. sent6: that if the pogonion is not auspicious that the Monegasque is a kind of non-auspicious thing that does not arrive is not right hold. sent7: if the fact that the pogonion does not arrive and it is not a Palestinian is not correct it wraps continuo. sent8: the calcimine is a fascist if it is textile. sent9: the pogonion does not construct suntrap. sent10: that the pogonion is not auspicious and arrives does not hold. sent11: the plantation is pyrogenic. sent12: the fact that the pogonion is not a Palestinian and does not wrap continuo is wrong. sent13: the fact that the Monegasque is inauspicious thing that does arrive does not hold if the pogonion is not inauspicious. sent14: that that the pogonion is non-auspicious thing that is Palestinian does not hold hold. sent15: the fact that the pogonion does not arrive and it is not a kind of a flinthead is wrong. sent16: there is something such that it does accompany. sent17: that the Monegasque does not arrive and it is not textile is incorrect if that the pogonion does not arrive hold. sent18: there exists something such that it rages. sent19: the pogonion does not arrive but it is a Palestinian if there is something such that it is wifely.
sent5 & sent19 -> int1: the pogonion does not arrive but it is a kind of a Palestinian.; int1 -> int2: the pogonion does not arrive.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the Monegasque does not arrive and is not textile is wrong is not wrong.; sent4 -> int4: if that the Monegasque does not arrive and it is not textile is false it is auspicious.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Monegasque is auspicious.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the Monegasque is auspicious and/or it wraps continuo is wrong is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pogonion does not wrap continuo but it arrives is not correct if the Monegasque does not wrap continuo. sent2: if the Monegasque is Palestinian then it is textile. sent3: that the Monegasque is not auspicious and it does not hunger eyeful does not hold. sent4: something is auspicious if the fact that it does not arrive and it is not textile does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that it is wifely. sent6: that if the pogonion is not auspicious that the Monegasque is a kind of non-auspicious thing that does not arrive is not right hold. sent7: if the fact that the pogonion does not arrive and it is not a Palestinian is not correct it wraps continuo. sent8: the calcimine is a fascist if it is textile. sent9: the pogonion does not construct suntrap. sent10: that the pogonion is not auspicious and arrives does not hold. sent11: the plantation is pyrogenic. sent12: the fact that the pogonion is not a Palestinian and does not wrap continuo is wrong. sent13: the fact that the Monegasque is inauspicious thing that does arrive does not hold if the pogonion is not inauspicious. sent14: that that the pogonion is non-auspicious thing that is Palestinian does not hold hold. sent15: the fact that the pogonion does not arrive and it is not a kind of a flinthead is wrong. sent16: there is something such that it does accompany. sent17: that the Monegasque does not arrive and it is not textile is incorrect if that the pogonion does not arrive hold. sent18: there exists something such that it rages. sent19: the pogonion does not arrive but it is a Palestinian if there is something such that it is wifely. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent19 -> int1: the pogonion does not arrive but it is a kind of a Palestinian.; int1 -> int2: the pogonion does not arrive.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the Monegasque does not arrive and is not textile is wrong is not wrong.; sent4 -> int4: if that the Monegasque does not arrive and it is not textile is false it is auspicious.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Monegasque is auspicious.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__