if the ciderpress justifies nabob then the Fabian is a Ailurus.
sent1: the monocot is a kind of a heartbreaker. sent2: if the ciderpress does not prod ALIR then the nabob is a Yukon and it is a Ailurus. sent3: if the monocot is a Yukon the ciderpress is covalent. sent4: that the monocot either is not a prohibition or is not a kind of a heartbreaker or both is wrong. sent5: the fact that if that something occupies and is a shagginess is not true then the fact that it does not prod ALIR is correct hold. sent6: if the nabob does relace aminophylline the fact that the ciderpress is a Yukon is not false. sent7: there exists something such that it justifies nabob. sent8: the monocot is covalent if the fact that it is not a kind of a prohibition or is a heartbreaker or both is not correct. sent9: if the nabob is not a Latin then that it does not justify nabob and does justify framing does not hold. sent10: the fact that the Fabian is a kind of a heartbreaker is not wrong if the fact that it is not a prohibition or it is not a kind of a Ailurus or both is incorrect. sent11: the nabob is not a Latin. sent12: if the fact that something does justify nabob and is a Yukon is not false it is not covalent. sent13: if the monocot relaces aminophylline then the jellyleaf is a prohibition. sent14: if the monocot is covalent the nabob relaces aminophylline. sent15: the Fabian is a kind of a heartbreaker. sent16: the Fabian is a Ailurus if something that does justify nabob is a Yukon. sent17: if the fact that the nabob does not justify nabob but it does justify framing is not right it justify nabob. sent18: if something is a Yukon and it is a Ailurus then that the Fabian does not justify nabob is not true.
the jellyleaf is a prohibition.
sent12 -> int1: the nabob is not covalent if it justifies nabob and it is a kind of a Yukon.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the nabob does not justify nabob and justifies framing does not hold.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the nabob justifies nabob.; sent5 -> int4: the ciderpress does not prod ALIR if that it does occupy and it is a shagginess is false.;
$hypothesis$ = if the ciderpress justifies nabob then the Fabian is a Ailurus. ; $context$ = sent1: the monocot is a kind of a heartbreaker. sent2: if the ciderpress does not prod ALIR then the nabob is a Yukon and it is a Ailurus. sent3: if the monocot is a Yukon the ciderpress is covalent. sent4: that the monocot either is not a prohibition or is not a kind of a heartbreaker or both is wrong. sent5: the fact that if that something occupies and is a shagginess is not true then the fact that it does not prod ALIR is correct hold. sent6: if the nabob does relace aminophylline the fact that the ciderpress is a Yukon is not false. sent7: there exists something such that it justifies nabob. sent8: the monocot is covalent if the fact that it is not a kind of a prohibition or is a heartbreaker or both is not correct. sent9: if the nabob is not a Latin then that it does not justify nabob and does justify framing does not hold. sent10: the fact that the Fabian is a kind of a heartbreaker is not wrong if the fact that it is not a prohibition or it is not a kind of a Ailurus or both is incorrect. sent11: the nabob is not a Latin. sent12: if the fact that something does justify nabob and is a Yukon is not false it is not covalent. sent13: if the monocot relaces aminophylline then the jellyleaf is a prohibition. sent14: if the monocot is covalent the nabob relaces aminophylline. sent15: the Fabian is a kind of a heartbreaker. sent16: the Fabian is a Ailurus if something that does justify nabob is a Yukon. sent17: if the fact that the nabob does not justify nabob but it does justify framing is not right it justify nabob. sent18: if something is a Yukon and it is a Ailurus then that the Fabian does not justify nabob is not true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__