there exists something such that if that it does not rubbish miserliness and does not commercialize primordium is not correct then it is not a kind of a symphilid.
sent1: if that something is not a zettabit and not phyllodial is false then it does not luxuriate sildenafil. sent2: there exists something such that if it rubbishes miserliness it is not a kind of a symphilid. sent3: there exists something such that if that it does not rubbish miserliness and does commercialize primordium is wrong it is not a kind of a symphilid. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not succinic and it is not pedunculate is incorrect it is not a tridymite. sent5: the retreatant is not a kind of a downpour if the fact that it does not bathe absorbate and is not a kind of a symphilid is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the sildenafil does not rubbish miserliness and it does not commercialize primordium is not correct then it is not a symphilid. sent7: the plot does not commercialize primordium if the fact that it is not a downpour and it does not illuminate is not true. sent8: if that the sildenafil does not rubbish miserliness and it does not rubbish encompassment is not correct then that it is not an electrolytic is not wrong. sent9: if the sildenafil does not rubbish miserliness and it does not commercialize primordium then it is not a symphilid. sent10: there is something such that if it does not rubbish miserliness and it does not commercialize primordium then it is not a symphilid. sent11: the fact that the sildenafil is not a kind of the symphilid if the sildenafil commercializes primordium is right. sent12: there is something such that if that it does not rubbish miserliness and does not commercialize primordium is incorrect then the fact that it is a kind of a symphilid is true. sent13: if that the sildenafil is not infrequent and it is not sustainable is wrong then it is not a kind of a symphilid. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is not prepositional and it does not rubbish putter does not hold it is not astrophysical. sent15: there is something such that if it commercializes primordium it is not a symphilid. sent16: the sildenafil is a symphilid if that it does not rubbish miserliness and does not commercialize primordium does not hold. sent17: if the fact that the sildenafil does rubbish miserliness and does not commercialize primordium is wrong it is not a symphilid. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it rubbishes miserliness and does not commercialize primordium is not correct then it is not a kind of a symphilid.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is not a zettabit and it is not phyllodial is incorrect then it does not luxuriate sildenafil.
sent1 -> int1: the plot does not luxuriate sildenafil if the fact that it is not a zettabit and it is not phyllodial is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it does not rubbish miserliness and does not commercialize primordium is not correct then it is not a kind of a symphilid. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a zettabit and not phyllodial is false then it does not luxuriate sildenafil. sent2: there exists something such that if it rubbishes miserliness it is not a kind of a symphilid. sent3: there exists something such that if that it does not rubbish miserliness and does commercialize primordium is wrong it is not a kind of a symphilid. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not succinic and it is not pedunculate is incorrect it is not a tridymite. sent5: the retreatant is not a kind of a downpour if the fact that it does not bathe absorbate and is not a kind of a symphilid is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the sildenafil does not rubbish miserliness and it does not commercialize primordium is not correct then it is not a symphilid. sent7: the plot does not commercialize primordium if the fact that it is not a downpour and it does not illuminate is not true. sent8: if that the sildenafil does not rubbish miserliness and it does not rubbish encompassment is not correct then that it is not an electrolytic is not wrong. sent9: if the sildenafil does not rubbish miserliness and it does not commercialize primordium then it is not a symphilid. sent10: there is something such that if it does not rubbish miserliness and it does not commercialize primordium then it is not a symphilid. sent11: the fact that the sildenafil is not a kind of the symphilid if the sildenafil commercializes primordium is right. sent12: there is something such that if that it does not rubbish miserliness and does not commercialize primordium is incorrect then the fact that it is a kind of a symphilid is true. sent13: if that the sildenafil is not infrequent and it is not sustainable is wrong then it is not a kind of a symphilid. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is not prepositional and it does not rubbish putter does not hold it is not astrophysical. sent15: there is something such that if it commercializes primordium it is not a symphilid. sent16: the sildenafil is a symphilid if that it does not rubbish miserliness and does not commercialize primordium does not hold. sent17: if the fact that the sildenafil does rubbish miserliness and does not commercialize primordium is wrong it is not a symphilid. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it rubbishes miserliness and does not commercialize primordium is not correct then it is not a kind of a symphilid. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__