there is something such that if it does not mow the fact that it is celestial and it is not a kind of a centrifugation is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does mow then that it is not non-celestial and not a centrifugation does not hold. sent2: if the andrena does not mow the fact that it is celestial and it is not a kind of a centrifugation is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if that it does not gild nearside is not wrong that it does gild dowager and it is a chuck-will's-widow is wrong. sent4: the fact that the andrena is celestial but it is not a centrifugation is wrong if it does mow. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not mow it is celestial and is not a kind of a centrifugation. sent6: if something does not condemn megadeath then that the fact that it is a kind of a lights-out and it is not a clinocephaly is correct is incorrect. sent7: if the andrena does not mow that it is celestial and is not a centrifugation is incorrect.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it does not condemn megadeath hold then the fact that it is a lights-out and it is not a clinocephaly is not right.
sent6 -> int1: if the cant does not condemn megadeath that it is a kind of a lights-out that is not a clinocephaly does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not mow the fact that it is celestial and it is not a kind of a centrifugation is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does mow then that it is not non-celestial and not a centrifugation does not hold. sent2: if the andrena does not mow the fact that it is celestial and it is not a kind of a centrifugation is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if that it does not gild nearside is not wrong that it does gild dowager and it is a chuck-will's-widow is wrong. sent4: the fact that the andrena is celestial but it is not a centrifugation is wrong if it does mow. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not mow it is celestial and is not a kind of a centrifugation. sent6: if something does not condemn megadeath then that the fact that it is a kind of a lights-out and it is not a clinocephaly is correct is incorrect. sent7: if the andrena does not mow that it is celestial and is not a centrifugation is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__