the fact that the Irishwoman alters and it is dendritic is not true.
sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of a mentality and is numerological is wrong it is not Tantric. sent2: that the Irishwoman is a kind of a distinction that is a deaf-aid is not correct if the Norinyl is not a distinction. sent3: if the cirrostratus leans detribalization it does accouter uptown. sent4: the cirrostratus does lean detribalization if that the fact that the henna does not renege and is not a Rus is incorrect is true. sent5: that something does alter and it is not non-dendritic does not hold if it is not a Guatemalan. sent6: the Norinyl is not dendritic. sent7: that the Irishwoman reneges and it is dendritic is false if the henna does not reneges. sent8: that the henna does not renege and is not a Rus does not hold. sent9: the cirrostratus accouters uptown. sent10: the Irishwoman is not a Guatemalan if it is not a kind of a deaf-aid. sent11: if the henna is not a kind of a bandwidth but it is a Rus then the Irishwoman is not a Guatemalan. sent12: if something does lean detribalization then it accouters uptown. sent13: the Norinyl is not a distinction if the cirrostratus is not a bandwidth and does accouter uptown. sent14: that the Norinyl does renege and is a distinction is wrong. sent15: the fact that the Norinyl accouters uptown and is a distinction is wrong. sent16: the Irishwoman is a Rus if that the henna is not a Guatemalan and is not a kind of a deaf-aid is wrong. sent17: if that something is a deaf-aid and a Guatemalan is not correct it does not renege. sent18: that the cirrostratus does lean detribalization hold if the henna reneges. sent19: the henna is not a kind of a deaf-aid. sent20: if the cirrostratus is not a distinction but it is a kind of a deaf-aid then that the Irishwoman does not accouter uptown is not wrong. sent21: the mouthpart is not an excellence if it does not lean detribalization. sent22: something alters if the fact that it does not alters and is not a Guatemalan does not hold. sent23: that the Irishwoman does not alter and it is not a kind of a Guatemalan is not right if it is not a deaf-aid. sent24: the henna is not a distinction if it is not a Rus. sent25: if something does lean detribalization then it is not a bandwidth and accouters uptown.
sent25 -> int1: the cirrostratus is not a bandwidth and accouters uptown if it leans detribalization.; sent4 & sent8 -> int2: the cirrostratus leans detribalization.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cirrostratus is not a bandwidth but it accouters uptown.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the Norinyl is not a kind of a distinction.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the Irishwoman is a kind of a distinction and it is a deaf-aid is not right.; sent5 -> int6: the fact that the Irishwoman does alter and is dendritic is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Guatemalan.;
the Irishwoman alters and it is dendritic.
sent22 -> int7: if the fact that the Irishwoman does not alter and is not Guatemalan is not right it alter.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Irishwoman alters and it is dendritic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of a mentality and is numerological is wrong it is not Tantric. sent2: that the Irishwoman is a kind of a distinction that is a deaf-aid is not correct if the Norinyl is not a distinction. sent3: if the cirrostratus leans detribalization it does accouter uptown. sent4: the cirrostratus does lean detribalization if that the fact that the henna does not renege and is not a Rus is incorrect is true. sent5: that something does alter and it is not non-dendritic does not hold if it is not a Guatemalan. sent6: the Norinyl is not dendritic. sent7: that the Irishwoman reneges and it is dendritic is false if the henna does not reneges. sent8: that the henna does not renege and is not a Rus does not hold. sent9: the cirrostratus accouters uptown. sent10: the Irishwoman is not a Guatemalan if it is not a kind of a deaf-aid. sent11: if the henna is not a kind of a bandwidth but it is a Rus then the Irishwoman is not a Guatemalan. sent12: if something does lean detribalization then it accouters uptown. sent13: the Norinyl is not a distinction if the cirrostratus is not a bandwidth and does accouter uptown. sent14: that the Norinyl does renege and is a distinction is wrong. sent15: the fact that the Norinyl accouters uptown and is a distinction is wrong. sent16: the Irishwoman is a Rus if that the henna is not a Guatemalan and is not a kind of a deaf-aid is wrong. sent17: if that something is a deaf-aid and a Guatemalan is not correct it does not renege. sent18: that the cirrostratus does lean detribalization hold if the henna reneges. sent19: the henna is not a kind of a deaf-aid. sent20: if the cirrostratus is not a distinction but it is a kind of a deaf-aid then that the Irishwoman does not accouter uptown is not wrong. sent21: the mouthpart is not an excellence if it does not lean detribalization. sent22: something alters if the fact that it does not alters and is not a Guatemalan does not hold. sent23: that the Irishwoman does not alter and it is not a kind of a Guatemalan is not right if it is not a deaf-aid. sent24: the henna is not a distinction if it is not a Rus. sent25: if something does lean detribalization then it is not a bandwidth and accouters uptown. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 -> int1: the cirrostratus is not a bandwidth and accouters uptown if it leans detribalization.; sent4 & sent8 -> int2: the cirrostratus leans detribalization.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cirrostratus is not a bandwidth but it accouters uptown.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the Norinyl is not a kind of a distinction.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the Irishwoman is a kind of a distinction and it is a deaf-aid is not right.; sent5 -> int6: the fact that the Irishwoman does alter and is dendritic is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Guatemalan.; __UNKNOWN__