the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Tuskegee and/or it is not a sax is incorrect it is nonaddictive does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Tuskegee and/or is not a sax it is nonaddictive. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is genic and/or it is not three-piece is not correct it is a kind of a Perodicticus. sent3: the crazy is nonaddictive if it is a Tuskegee or it is not a kind of a sax or both. sent4: that if the fact that the crazy is methodological and/or it is not nonaddictive is not right then the crazy is zoological is not false. sent5: if the fact that the crazy is a Tuskegee or not a sax or both is incorrect it is nonaddictive. sent6: if the fact that the crazy is a Tuskegee and/or it is a kind of a sax does not hold then it is not addictive. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is gerundial or is not dithyrambic or both does not hold then that it is headless is correct. sent8: if the fact that the crazy is a pabulum and/or not bibliopolic does not hold it does cloister crazy. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Tuskegee and/or it is a kind of a sax does not hold it is nonaddictive.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Tuskegee and/or it is not a sax is incorrect it is nonaddictive does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Tuskegee and/or is not a sax it is nonaddictive. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is genic and/or it is not three-piece is not correct it is a kind of a Perodicticus. sent3: the crazy is nonaddictive if it is a Tuskegee or it is not a kind of a sax or both. sent4: that if the fact that the crazy is methodological and/or it is not nonaddictive is not right then the crazy is zoological is not false. sent5: if the fact that the crazy is a Tuskegee or not a sax or both is incorrect it is nonaddictive. sent6: if the fact that the crazy is a Tuskegee and/or it is a kind of a sax does not hold then it is not addictive. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is gerundial or is not dithyrambic or both does not hold then that it is headless is correct. sent8: if the fact that the crazy is a pabulum and/or not bibliopolic does not hold it does cloister crazy. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Tuskegee and/or it is a kind of a sax does not hold it is nonaddictive. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__