the fact that something kicks and it does reposition is not true.
sent1: the detergent magnetizes collectivism if the Chinaman does magnetizes collectivism. sent2: something repositions if that it does not repositions and it is not equestrian is not right. sent3: if there is something such that it does uniform that the ingenue is not a kind of a speakeasy and is not a uniform is wrong. sent4: the opopanax repositions but it is not a kick if the detergent does repositions. sent5: the fact that the Chinaman is a uniform is correct. sent6: the fact that the opopanax does reposition and is not equestrian is not true if there exists something such that it is equestrian. sent7: if that the Chinaman does magnetize collectivism is not incorrect the detergent does magnetize collectivism and is not a kick. sent8: the squinch does reposition. sent9: if the fact that something is both not uniform and non-equestrian does not hold it is a uniform. sent10: if that the detergent does kick is not true the opopanax is a kick and uniform. sent11: the Chinaman is reconcilable. sent12: the cornhusker does magnetize collectivism. sent13: there exists something such that it kicks. sent14: the opopanax does uniform if the detergent is not a kick. sent15: that the opopanax is a kick but not equestrian is right if the Chinaman kick. sent16: the opopanax is a uniform and it is equestrian if the Chinaman is uniform. sent17: that the borage is not equestrian is wrong. sent18: something does reposition. sent19: if that something is equestrian hold that that the opopanax does not reposition and is not equestrian is not incorrect is incorrect. sent20: the opopanax uniforms. sent21: there exists something such that it magnetizes collectivism and does reposition. sent22: the borage repositions. sent23: if the borage does not reposition the opopanax does reposition and it is equestrian. sent24: that the Chinaman does not magnetize collectivism is incorrect if that it is not reconcilable is not right. sent25: the detergent magnetizes collectivism. sent26: that the opopanax repositions but it is not equestrian is not true. sent27: the borage is reconcilable.
sent24 & sent11 -> int1: the Chinaman magnetizes collectivism.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the detergent does magnetize collectivism but it is not a kick.; int2 -> int3: the detergent is not a kick.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the opopanax is a kick and uniform.; int4 -> int5: the opopanax does kick.; sent2 -> int6: if the fact that the opopanax does not reposition and is not equestrian does not hold it reposition.; sent17 -> int7: there exists something such that it is equestrian.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the fact that the opopanax does not reposition and is not equestrian is incorrect.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the opopanax repositions.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the opopanax is a kind of a kick that repositions.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something kicks and it does reposition is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the detergent magnetizes collectivism if the Chinaman does magnetizes collectivism. sent2: something repositions if that it does not repositions and it is not equestrian is not right. sent3: if there is something such that it does uniform that the ingenue is not a kind of a speakeasy and is not a uniform is wrong. sent4: the opopanax repositions but it is not a kick if the detergent does repositions. sent5: the fact that the Chinaman is a uniform is correct. sent6: the fact that the opopanax does reposition and is not equestrian is not true if there exists something such that it is equestrian. sent7: if that the Chinaman does magnetize collectivism is not incorrect the detergent does magnetize collectivism and is not a kick. sent8: the squinch does reposition. sent9: if the fact that something is both not uniform and non-equestrian does not hold it is a uniform. sent10: if that the detergent does kick is not true the opopanax is a kick and uniform. sent11: the Chinaman is reconcilable. sent12: the cornhusker does magnetize collectivism. sent13: there exists something such that it kicks. sent14: the opopanax does uniform if the detergent is not a kick. sent15: that the opopanax is a kick but not equestrian is right if the Chinaman kick. sent16: the opopanax is a uniform and it is equestrian if the Chinaman is uniform. sent17: that the borage is not equestrian is wrong. sent18: something does reposition. sent19: if that something is equestrian hold that that the opopanax does not reposition and is not equestrian is not incorrect is incorrect. sent20: the opopanax uniforms. sent21: there exists something such that it magnetizes collectivism and does reposition. sent22: the borage repositions. sent23: if the borage does not reposition the opopanax does reposition and it is equestrian. sent24: that the Chinaman does not magnetize collectivism is incorrect if that it is not reconcilable is not right. sent25: the detergent magnetizes collectivism. sent26: that the opopanax repositions but it is not equestrian is not true. sent27: the borage is reconcilable. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent11 -> int1: the Chinaman magnetizes collectivism.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the detergent does magnetize collectivism but it is not a kick.; int2 -> int3: the detergent is not a kick.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the opopanax is a kick and uniform.; int4 -> int5: the opopanax does kick.; sent2 -> int6: if the fact that the opopanax does not reposition and is not equestrian does not hold it reposition.; sent17 -> int7: there exists something such that it is equestrian.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the fact that the opopanax does not reposition and is not equestrian is incorrect.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the opopanax repositions.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the opopanax is a kind of a kick that repositions.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__