the leotard does not clap aquatint.
sent1: if the fact that the pecan does clap aquatint and it does corrode stern does not hold then the leotard is not a kind of a bogeyman. sent2: the rotifer does not corrode sensing. sent3: that the leotard does clap aquatint and is a kind of a bogeyman is false. sent4: if the fact that the pecan is not a kind of a ranker and is a bogeyman is false the cautery is not a bogeyman. sent5: if something does not corrode sensing that it does corrode stern and is a bogeyman is not true. sent6: if something is not a bogeyman the fact that it does clap aquatint and corrodes sensing is not right. sent7: that the antiviral does not corrode sensing and it is not a bogeyman is not correct if the plug does not corrode stern. sent8: the leotard does not clap aquatint if the pecan is not a kind of a bogeyman. sent9: if the Aquarius corrodes sensing then the pecan is a kind of a ranker and/or it does not clap aquatint. sent10: if there is something such that it does not clap polyploid the fact that the pecan does not clap IDA is not wrong. sent11: the pecan does not corrode sensing if there exists something such that it is not a ranker. sent12: there exists something such that it does not clap aquatint. sent13: something corrodes archer. sent14: that the clemency is not adenocarcinomatous and does corrode Cnicus is not right if the lunch does not gnaw. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the leotard is a bogeyman and it corrodes stern is correct is false then the pecan does not clap aquatint. sent16: if the pecan does not corrode sensing then the fact that it claps aquatint and is a kind of a bogeyman is not true. sent17: the fact that the AU does cowl and is focal is not true. sent18: that the leotard is not a Trevithick hold if there is something such that it is not adenocarcinomatous. sent19: if the pecan is a ranker or it does not clap aquatint or both the leotard clap aquatint. sent20: if something does not exult cutler then the pecan is not a ranker. sent21: the pecan does not clap aquatint if there is something such that it does not corrode stern. sent22: there is something such that it is a ranker. sent23: there is something such that the fact that that it is a ranker is correct is not right. sent24: that the leotard does not clap aquatint if the fact that the pecan does corrode stern and it is a bogeyman is wrong is not incorrect.
sent23 & sent11 -> int1: the pecan does not corrode sensing.; sent5 -> int2: if the pecan does not corrode sensing then the fact that it corrodes stern and is a bogeyman is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the pecan corrodes stern and is a bogeyman is incorrect.; int3 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
that the cautery is a bogeyman is false.
$hypothesis$ = the leotard does not clap aquatint. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the pecan does clap aquatint and it does corrode stern does not hold then the leotard is not a kind of a bogeyman. sent2: the rotifer does not corrode sensing. sent3: that the leotard does clap aquatint and is a kind of a bogeyman is false. sent4: if the fact that the pecan is not a kind of a ranker and is a bogeyman is false the cautery is not a bogeyman. sent5: if something does not corrode sensing that it does corrode stern and is a bogeyman is not true. sent6: if something is not a bogeyman the fact that it does clap aquatint and corrodes sensing is not right. sent7: that the antiviral does not corrode sensing and it is not a bogeyman is not correct if the plug does not corrode stern. sent8: the leotard does not clap aquatint if the pecan is not a kind of a bogeyman. sent9: if the Aquarius corrodes sensing then the pecan is a kind of a ranker and/or it does not clap aquatint. sent10: if there is something such that it does not clap polyploid the fact that the pecan does not clap IDA is not wrong. sent11: the pecan does not corrode sensing if there exists something such that it is not a ranker. sent12: there exists something such that it does not clap aquatint. sent13: something corrodes archer. sent14: that the clemency is not adenocarcinomatous and does corrode Cnicus is not right if the lunch does not gnaw. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the leotard is a bogeyman and it corrodes stern is correct is false then the pecan does not clap aquatint. sent16: if the pecan does not corrode sensing then the fact that it claps aquatint and is a kind of a bogeyman is not true. sent17: the fact that the AU does cowl and is focal is not true. sent18: that the leotard is not a Trevithick hold if there is something such that it is not adenocarcinomatous. sent19: if the pecan is a ranker or it does not clap aquatint or both the leotard clap aquatint. sent20: if something does not exult cutler then the pecan is not a ranker. sent21: the pecan does not clap aquatint if there is something such that it does not corrode stern. sent22: there is something such that it is a ranker. sent23: there is something such that the fact that that it is a ranker is correct is not right. sent24: that the leotard does not clap aquatint if the fact that the pecan does corrode stern and it is a bogeyman is wrong is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent11 -> int1: the pecan does not corrode sensing.; sent5 -> int2: if the pecan does not corrode sensing then the fact that it corrodes stern and is a bogeyman is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the pecan corrodes stern and is a bogeyman is incorrect.; int3 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__