the fact that the fetishism does not repine insalubrity is true.
sent1: the GHQ is not a yucca but crystalline. sent2: something that does repine insalubrity is not a misalliance and is air-to-surface. sent3: the fact that the fetishism is not an incompetent is not incorrect if the hypodermic is incompetent and it does not repine unconnectedness. sent4: something that is not non-air-to-surface is not a misalliance but climatic. sent5: the brioche is not a misalliance. sent6: something is a kind of non-air-to-surface thing that does not repine Goth if it is not an incompetent. sent7: if that the fetishism does repine Goth is not false then it does repine insalubrity. sent8: the fetishism does repine Goth if the fact that it is climatic hold. sent9: that the fetishism is not hand-held is not incorrect. sent10: the fetishism is air-to-surface. sent11: a non-air-to-surface thing that does not repine Goth does not repine insalubrity. sent12: if the fetishism is air-to-surface it is not a kind of a misalliance.
sent4 -> int1: if the fetishism is air-to-surface it is both not a misalliance and climatic.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fetishism is not a kind of a misalliance but it is climatic.; int2 -> int3: the fetishism is climatic.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fetishism repines Goth.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fetishism does not repine insalubrity.
sent11 -> int5: if the fetishism is not air-to-surface and it does not repine Goth it does not repine insalubrity.; sent6 -> int6: if the fetishism is not an incompetent it is not air-to-surface and does not repine Goth.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fetishism does not repine insalubrity is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the GHQ is not a yucca but crystalline. sent2: something that does repine insalubrity is not a misalliance and is air-to-surface. sent3: the fact that the fetishism is not an incompetent is not incorrect if the hypodermic is incompetent and it does not repine unconnectedness. sent4: something that is not non-air-to-surface is not a misalliance but climatic. sent5: the brioche is not a misalliance. sent6: something is a kind of non-air-to-surface thing that does not repine Goth if it is not an incompetent. sent7: if that the fetishism does repine Goth is not false then it does repine insalubrity. sent8: the fetishism does repine Goth if the fact that it is climatic hold. sent9: that the fetishism is not hand-held is not incorrect. sent10: the fetishism is air-to-surface. sent11: a non-air-to-surface thing that does not repine Goth does not repine insalubrity. sent12: if the fetishism is air-to-surface it is not a kind of a misalliance. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the fetishism is air-to-surface it is both not a misalliance and climatic.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fetishism is not a kind of a misalliance but it is climatic.; int2 -> int3: the fetishism is climatic.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fetishism repines Goth.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__