the fact that the disk is not non-marital is correct.
sent1: the depiction is a curability and intelligible. sent2: the fact that something is marital and does not disentangle Tugela is incorrect if the fact that it is not Gauguinesque is right. sent3: the kraal is Gauguinesque. sent4: if something is not a devilfish then the fact that the opal is a kind of a devilfish and it does disentangle Tugela is incorrect. sent5: the disk is not a straight. sent6: something is not marital if the fact that it is marital and does not disentangle Tugela is not correct. sent7: the fact that the disk is a clarity and it is a curability does not hold. sent8: that something is a kind of a titter that is not Gauguinesque does not hold if it does not disentangle Tugela. sent9: if something is a kind of a devilfish then it is not a curability. sent10: the kraal is a kind of a devilfish. sent11: if the fact that something is obligatory but it is not a devilfish is not true it is not a curability. sent12: something does not disentangle Tugela if the fact that it is a devilfish and does disentangle Tugela is incorrect. sent13: that the disk is obligatory and is a devilfish is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it does disentangle Tugela is not wrong. sent14: the kraal is not obligatory. sent15: the disk is not a curability if it is a kind of a devilfish. sent16: the organophosphate is not Gauguinesque. sent17: if the disk is a straight it is not obligatory and/or it is not a kind of a curability. sent18: the disk is not a kind of a urocele. sent19: the disk is marital if it is not a curability and is not a kind of a straight. sent20: the fact that the disk is obligatory and not a devilfish is not correct if something disentangles Tugela.
sent11 -> int1: if the fact that the disk is obligatory and is not a devilfish does not hold it is not a curability.;
the disk is not marital.
sent6 -> int2: if that the disk is marital and does not disentangle Tugela is wrong it is not marital.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the disk is a kind of marital thing that does not disentangle Tugela does not hold if it is not Gauguinesque.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the disk is not non-marital is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the depiction is a curability and intelligible. sent2: the fact that something is marital and does not disentangle Tugela is incorrect if the fact that it is not Gauguinesque is right. sent3: the kraal is Gauguinesque. sent4: if something is not a devilfish then the fact that the opal is a kind of a devilfish and it does disentangle Tugela is incorrect. sent5: the disk is not a straight. sent6: something is not marital if the fact that it is marital and does not disentangle Tugela is not correct. sent7: the fact that the disk is a clarity and it is a curability does not hold. sent8: that something is a kind of a titter that is not Gauguinesque does not hold if it does not disentangle Tugela. sent9: if something is a kind of a devilfish then it is not a curability. sent10: the kraal is a kind of a devilfish. sent11: if the fact that something is obligatory but it is not a devilfish is not true it is not a curability. sent12: something does not disentangle Tugela if the fact that it is a devilfish and does disentangle Tugela is incorrect. sent13: that the disk is obligatory and is a devilfish is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it does disentangle Tugela is not wrong. sent14: the kraal is not obligatory. sent15: the disk is not a curability if it is a kind of a devilfish. sent16: the organophosphate is not Gauguinesque. sent17: if the disk is a straight it is not obligatory and/or it is not a kind of a curability. sent18: the disk is not a kind of a urocele. sent19: the disk is marital if it is not a curability and is not a kind of a straight. sent20: the fact that the disk is obligatory and not a devilfish is not correct if something disentangles Tugela. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the fact that the disk is obligatory and is not a devilfish does not hold it is not a curability.; __UNKNOWN__