the erotic trices Indigofera and is not a Fox.
sent1: if that the voussoir does pertain and does not trice glove does not hold then the scattering is not unidentifiable. sent2: the scattering does not trice glove. sent3: something does percuss if it is wintry. sent4: if something is not unidentifiable then it occults internuncio. sent5: the fact that the scattering does not occult Durante and does occult schlockmeister is incorrect. sent6: if the voussoir does not trice Indigofera the fact that the erotic does trice Indigofera but it is not a Fox does not hold. sent7: the fact that the erotic does not trice glove and does trice Indigofera is not correct. sent8: that the erotic is monatomic and it does trice Indigofera is not wrong. sent9: if that something does not occult Durante but it occults schlockmeister does not hold it does not occults schlockmeister. sent10: if something trices Indigofera then that it pertains and does not trice glove is not true. sent11: the quarters does not trice glove. sent12: something is testicular if it is not a noiselessness. sent13: the seismologist does occult Durante. sent14: something that does occult internuncio occults schlockmeister.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the voussoir does pertain and does not trice glove is not right if it does trice Indigofera.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the voussoir trices Indigofera.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the voussoir does pertain and does not trice glove is not true.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the scattering is not unidentifiable.; sent4 -> int4: the scattering does occult internuncio if the fact that it is not unidentifiable hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the scattering occults internuncio.; sent14 -> int6: if the scattering does occult internuncio then it does occult schlockmeister.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the scattering does occult schlockmeister.; sent9 -> int8: that the scattering does not occult schlockmeister is correct if that it does not occult Durante and does occult schlockmeister does not hold.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the scattering does not occult schlockmeister.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the voussoir does not trice Indigofera.; int11 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the erotic does trice Indigofera and is not a Fox.
sent8 -> int12: the erotic trices Indigofera.;
$hypothesis$ = the erotic trices Indigofera and is not a Fox. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the voussoir does pertain and does not trice glove does not hold then the scattering is not unidentifiable. sent2: the scattering does not trice glove. sent3: something does percuss if it is wintry. sent4: if something is not unidentifiable then it occults internuncio. sent5: the fact that the scattering does not occult Durante and does occult schlockmeister is incorrect. sent6: if the voussoir does not trice Indigofera the fact that the erotic does trice Indigofera but it is not a Fox does not hold. sent7: the fact that the erotic does not trice glove and does trice Indigofera is not correct. sent8: that the erotic is monatomic and it does trice Indigofera is not wrong. sent9: if that something does not occult Durante but it occults schlockmeister does not hold it does not occults schlockmeister. sent10: if something trices Indigofera then that it pertains and does not trice glove is not true. sent11: the quarters does not trice glove. sent12: something is testicular if it is not a noiselessness. sent13: the seismologist does occult Durante. sent14: something that does occult internuncio occults schlockmeister. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the voussoir does pertain and does not trice glove is not right if it does trice Indigofera.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the voussoir trices Indigofera.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the voussoir does pertain and does not trice glove is not true.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the scattering is not unidentifiable.; sent4 -> int4: the scattering does occult internuncio if the fact that it is not unidentifiable hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the scattering occults internuncio.; sent14 -> int6: if the scattering does occult internuncio then it does occult schlockmeister.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the scattering does occult schlockmeister.; sent9 -> int8: that the scattering does not occult schlockmeister is correct if that it does not occult Durante and does occult schlockmeister does not hold.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the scattering does not occult schlockmeister.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the voussoir does not trice Indigofera.; int11 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__