there exists something such that if it is not boskopoid then the fact that that either it is not a Gerbera or it is not unable or both is right is not true.
sent1: if the blink is not boskopoid then it is unable. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Labridae the fact that it is not cross-sentential and/or it is not Nicaean is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not boskopoid it is either not a Gerbera or not unable or both. sent4: there is something such that if it is an eighties then that it is not a kind of a Diderot and/or is non-genital is not correct. sent5: that something is not unsound and/or it is not a leatherette is wrong if it does not hypnotize Pelagius. sent6: there is something such that if that it anneals is not wrong then that either it is not a balance or it is not a teased or both is not correct. sent7: if the blink is not boskopoid then that it is a Gerbera and/or it is not unable is not right. sent8: if something does not exclaim Adventism then the fact that it is not a handling or does not pin ethics or both does not hold. sent9: if the blink is not boskopoid then it is not a kind of a Gerbera or it is not unable or both. sent10: there is something such that if it does not hypnotize myrmecophile that it is a sum is not false. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not boskopoid that it is either not a Gerbera or unable or both is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not boskopoid then it is a Gerbera. sent13: there is something such that if it is not boskopoid it is unable. sent14: there exists something such that if it is boskopoid then that it is not a Gerbera or it is not unable or both is not right. sent15: if the blink is not boskopoid that it is not a Gerbera and/or it is not unable is not true. sent16: the fact that either the blink is not a Gerbera or it is not unable or both is not correct if it is boskopoid.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not hypnotize Pelagius then the fact that the fact that it is sound and/or it is not a leatherette hold does not hold.
sent5 -> int1: that the raper is not unsound and/or is not a leatherette is not true if it does not hypnotize Pelagius.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not boskopoid then the fact that that either it is not a Gerbera or it is not unable or both is right is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blink is not boskopoid then it is unable. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Labridae the fact that it is not cross-sentential and/or it is not Nicaean is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not boskopoid it is either not a Gerbera or not unable or both. sent4: there is something such that if it is an eighties then that it is not a kind of a Diderot and/or is non-genital is not correct. sent5: that something is not unsound and/or it is not a leatherette is wrong if it does not hypnotize Pelagius. sent6: there is something such that if that it anneals is not wrong then that either it is not a balance or it is not a teased or both is not correct. sent7: if the blink is not boskopoid then that it is a Gerbera and/or it is not unable is not right. sent8: if something does not exclaim Adventism then the fact that it is not a handling or does not pin ethics or both does not hold. sent9: if the blink is not boskopoid then it is not a kind of a Gerbera or it is not unable or both. sent10: there is something such that if it does not hypnotize myrmecophile that it is a sum is not false. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not boskopoid that it is either not a Gerbera or unable or both is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not boskopoid then it is a Gerbera. sent13: there is something such that if it is not boskopoid it is unable. sent14: there exists something such that if it is boskopoid then that it is not a Gerbera or it is not unable or both is not right. sent15: if the blink is not boskopoid that it is not a Gerbera and/or it is not unable is not true. sent16: the fact that either the blink is not a Gerbera or it is not unable or both is not correct if it is boskopoid. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__