the inoperableness and/or the curettage occurs.
sent1: the criticizing ILO occurs. sent2: if the crustoseness does not occur then not the heaping Hygrocybe but the criticizing uncus happens. sent3: if the epidemicness happens the septicness happens. sent4: if the conjuncture does not occur then the heaping Hygrocybe occurs. sent5: if the crustoseness does not occur then that not the criticizing uncus but the heaping Hygrocybe happens is wrong. sent6: the yeastiness happens or the counterrevolution happens or both. sent7: the conjuncture happens. sent8: the anticlimax does not occur. sent9: if the heaping Hygrocybe happens then the inoperableness occurs. sent10: the heaping Hygrocybe occurs if that the instructorship does not occur but the conjuncture happens is not correct. sent11: if the criticizing uncus happens then that not the curettage but the inoperableness happens is not correct. sent12: the narcolepticness occurs. sent13: the anticlimax does not occur or the septicness does not occur or both if the epidemicness does not occur. sent14: the criticizing uncus happens and the crustoseness occurs. sent15: the heaping crabbed happens. sent16: if the instructorship does not occur but the conjuncture occurs the epidemic occurs. sent17: that the anticlimax happens but the epidemicness does not occur leads to the non-septicness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the instructorship but the conjuncture occurs.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the epidemic occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the septicness happens.;
the fact that the inoperableness and/or the curettage happens is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the inoperableness and/or the curettage occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the criticizing ILO occurs. sent2: if the crustoseness does not occur then not the heaping Hygrocybe but the criticizing uncus happens. sent3: if the epidemicness happens the septicness happens. sent4: if the conjuncture does not occur then the heaping Hygrocybe occurs. sent5: if the crustoseness does not occur then that not the criticizing uncus but the heaping Hygrocybe happens is wrong. sent6: the yeastiness happens or the counterrevolution happens or both. sent7: the conjuncture happens. sent8: the anticlimax does not occur. sent9: if the heaping Hygrocybe happens then the inoperableness occurs. sent10: the heaping Hygrocybe occurs if that the instructorship does not occur but the conjuncture happens is not correct. sent11: if the criticizing uncus happens then that not the curettage but the inoperableness happens is not correct. sent12: the narcolepticness occurs. sent13: the anticlimax does not occur or the septicness does not occur or both if the epidemicness does not occur. sent14: the criticizing uncus happens and the crustoseness occurs. sent15: the heaping crabbed happens. sent16: if the instructorship does not occur but the conjuncture occurs the epidemic occurs. sent17: that the anticlimax happens but the epidemicness does not occur leads to the non-septicness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the instructorship but the conjuncture occurs.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the epidemic occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the septicness happens.; __UNKNOWN__