the fact that there is something such that if it does not bestir Snow and it is not a kind of a planning then it is a yellowthroat is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is dehiscent but not a haunt it is a cavetto. sent2: if the fact that something is not a kind of a planning and it is not noncollapsible is not wrong it is a heteroploid. sent3: the portiere is a kind of a yellowthroat if it does bestir Snow and is not a planning. sent4: if the swallow does not slave likeness and is not photographic it bestirs Snow. sent5: if the portiere does not bestir Snow and does not plan it is a yellowthroat. sent6: the portiere does slave plumbago if it does not liquefy chlordiazepoxide and it is not parabolic. sent7: the portiere is a yellowthroat if it does not bestir Snow and it is a kind of a planning. sent8: if the plumbago is both a repose and not calisthenic then it is obligate. sent9: the portiere leaves if it embodies and is not a planning. sent10: if the enlarger does liquefy chlordiazepoxide and is not obligate it does bestir Snow. sent11: there exists something such that if it does bestir Snow and it does not plan then that it is a kind of a yellowthroat is right. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not bestir Snow and does plan it is a kind of a yellowthroat. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both not photographic and not intrastate then it is precocious.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the Snow does not plan and it is not noncollapsible then it is a heteroploid.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not bestir Snow and it is not a kind of a planning then it is a yellowthroat is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is dehiscent but not a haunt it is a cavetto. sent2: if the fact that something is not a kind of a planning and it is not noncollapsible is not wrong it is a heteroploid. sent3: the portiere is a kind of a yellowthroat if it does bestir Snow and is not a planning. sent4: if the swallow does not slave likeness and is not photographic it bestirs Snow. sent5: if the portiere does not bestir Snow and does not plan it is a yellowthroat. sent6: the portiere does slave plumbago if it does not liquefy chlordiazepoxide and it is not parabolic. sent7: the portiere is a yellowthroat if it does not bestir Snow and it is a kind of a planning. sent8: if the plumbago is both a repose and not calisthenic then it is obligate. sent9: the portiere leaves if it embodies and is not a planning. sent10: if the enlarger does liquefy chlordiazepoxide and is not obligate it does bestir Snow. sent11: there exists something such that if it does bestir Snow and it does not plan then that it is a kind of a yellowthroat is right. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not bestir Snow and does plan it is a kind of a yellowthroat. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both not photographic and not intrastate then it is precocious. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__