that the jack-o-lantern does not pleach death and/or it is not non-lighting is not correct.
sent1: that the reticule does pleach countess hold if the pepsin works austerity. sent2: the fact that the fruitcake is an accelerometer but it does not unpack is wrong. sent3: if the fact that something does work wrinkled but it is not an accelerometer is not correct then it is an accelerometer. sent4: either the jack-o-lantern pleaches death or it is lighting or both. sent5: if the countess is an accelerometer then the fact that the jack-o-lantern does not pleach death and/or it does light is not true. sent6: something that does not pleach countess does work wrinkled and/or is a feebleness. sent7: if the lees does not vex reticule or it does not work austerity or both the fact that the pepsin work austerity is true. sent8: something does not vex reticule or it does not work austerity or both if it is a Anaheim. sent9: something does not pleach countess if it does work austerity. sent10: the pepsin does work austerity. sent11: if the jack-o-lantern does pleach death then the countess is a kind of non-facial thing that is not a marshmallow. sent12: the jack-o-lantern is a kind of a facial if the countess is non-lighting thing that is not a marshmallow. sent13: the fruitcake does not pleach countess if the reticule pleach countess. sent14: if the countess is not a facial and it is not a marshmallow then the fruitcake is an accelerometer. sent15: if the fact that the fruitcake does work wrinkled is correct the countess does work wrinkled. sent16: the fruitcake does not unpack. sent17: the lees is a Anaheim. sent18: the fruitcake does not work wrinkled if the reticule does not unpack and is a feebleness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jack-o-lantern pleaches death.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the countess is non-facial but not a marshmallow.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fruitcake is an accelerometer.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the fruitcake is an accelerometer and does not unpack.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the jack-o-lantern does not pleach death.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the jack-o-lantern does not pleach death or lights or both is not right.
sent3 -> int6: if that the countess does work wrinkled and is not an accelerometer does not hold then it is an accelerometer.; sent9 -> int7: the pepsin does not pleach countess if it does work austerity.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the pepsin does not pleach countess.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does not pleach countess.;
$hypothesis$ = that the jack-o-lantern does not pleach death and/or it is not non-lighting is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the reticule does pleach countess hold if the pepsin works austerity. sent2: the fact that the fruitcake is an accelerometer but it does not unpack is wrong. sent3: if the fact that something does work wrinkled but it is not an accelerometer is not correct then it is an accelerometer. sent4: either the jack-o-lantern pleaches death or it is lighting or both. sent5: if the countess is an accelerometer then the fact that the jack-o-lantern does not pleach death and/or it does light is not true. sent6: something that does not pleach countess does work wrinkled and/or is a feebleness. sent7: if the lees does not vex reticule or it does not work austerity or both the fact that the pepsin work austerity is true. sent8: something does not vex reticule or it does not work austerity or both if it is a Anaheim. sent9: something does not pleach countess if it does work austerity. sent10: the pepsin does work austerity. sent11: if the jack-o-lantern does pleach death then the countess is a kind of non-facial thing that is not a marshmallow. sent12: the jack-o-lantern is a kind of a facial if the countess is non-lighting thing that is not a marshmallow. sent13: the fruitcake does not pleach countess if the reticule pleach countess. sent14: if the countess is not a facial and it is not a marshmallow then the fruitcake is an accelerometer. sent15: if the fact that the fruitcake does work wrinkled is correct the countess does work wrinkled. sent16: the fruitcake does not unpack. sent17: the lees is a Anaheim. sent18: the fruitcake does not work wrinkled if the reticule does not unpack and is a feebleness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jack-o-lantern pleaches death.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the countess is non-facial but not a marshmallow.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fruitcake is an accelerometer.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the fruitcake is an accelerometer and does not unpack.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the jack-o-lantern does not pleach death.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__