the fact that there exists something such that it is either a web or not non-monotheistic or both is not correct.
sent1: something that is monotheistic does web. sent2: the fact that the muumuu does web is wrong. sent3: the roundsman does not blind visored. sent4: the muumuu accouters baron or it is a permanent or both. sent5: the fact that the roundsman does not blind alumnus and is not monotheistic is not correct. sent6: the self-portrait is monotheistic if the roundsman is both not monotheistic and archipelagic. sent7: that the muumuu does not blind visored and is not a permanent is incorrect if the roundsman is not a web. sent8: something is not a permanent and it does not accouter baron if it webs. sent9: everything does not blind visored and it is not a permanent. sent10: the muumuu is a samarium. sent11: everything is not a fare-thee-well. sent12: if something is not a box then it does lean muumuu and it is tough. sent13: that that the muumuu does blind visored but it is impermanent does not hold is not wrong. sent14: if the fact that the muumuu is a Kashag and/or it does not box is false then the roundsman is not a box. sent15: if something does lean muumuu then it is not monotheistic but archipelagic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roundsman does not web.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the muumuu does not blind visored and it is not a kind of a permanent is not correct.; sent9 -> int2: the muumuu does not blind visored and is impermanent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the roundsman is a web is not false.; int4 -> int5: the fact that either the roundsman webs or it is monotheistic or both is not incorrect.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the self-portrait is not permanent and it does not accouter baron.
sent8 -> int6: if the self-portrait webs it is impermanent and it does not accouter baron.; sent1 -> int7: if the self-portrait is monotheistic it is a web.; sent15 -> int8: if the roundsman does lean muumuu then the fact that it is not monotheistic and is archipelagic hold.; sent12 -> int9: the roundsman does lean muumuu and is a tough if it is not a kind of a box.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is either a web or not non-monotheistic or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is monotheistic does web. sent2: the fact that the muumuu does web is wrong. sent3: the roundsman does not blind visored. sent4: the muumuu accouters baron or it is a permanent or both. sent5: the fact that the roundsman does not blind alumnus and is not monotheistic is not correct. sent6: the self-portrait is monotheistic if the roundsman is both not monotheistic and archipelagic. sent7: that the muumuu does not blind visored and is not a permanent is incorrect if the roundsman is not a web. sent8: something is not a permanent and it does not accouter baron if it webs. sent9: everything does not blind visored and it is not a permanent. sent10: the muumuu is a samarium. sent11: everything is not a fare-thee-well. sent12: if something is not a box then it does lean muumuu and it is tough. sent13: that that the muumuu does blind visored but it is impermanent does not hold is not wrong. sent14: if the fact that the muumuu is a Kashag and/or it does not box is false then the roundsman is not a box. sent15: if something does lean muumuu then it is not monotheistic but archipelagic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roundsman does not web.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the muumuu does not blind visored and it is not a kind of a permanent is not correct.; sent9 -> int2: the muumuu does not blind visored and is impermanent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the roundsman is a web is not false.; int4 -> int5: the fact that either the roundsman webs or it is monotheistic or both is not incorrect.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__