the lamb-chop is not a kind of an indium and does not ray toleration.
sent1: the fact that something is not an indium and it does not ray toleration is not right if that it is a kind of a quire is right. sent2: the ameba does not finger proprioceptor and is diligent. sent3: the ameba does not vacate teletypewriter. sent4: the ameba is an indium if a non-musculoskeletal thing does not ray toleration. sent5: something is a quire and a squeeze if it is not Hebridean. sent6: if the cytochrome is not a kind of a squeeze then the lotus-eater is a squeeze and Hebridean. sent7: something is not a squeeze and it is not musculoskeletal if it is not a kind of a quire. sent8: that the artery does not vacate teletypewriter and is a squeeze is not true if the lotus-eater does squeeze. sent9: if that the lamb-chop either is not an indium or vacates teletypewriter or both is false the fact that the amygdalin is not Hebridean hold. sent10: the ameba is musculoskeletal if it vacates Tenoretic. sent11: if something vacates Tenoretic but it is not a squeeze the lamb-chop does ray toleration. sent12: if something is a kind of nonsubmersible thing that does not finger astrakhan the ameba does vacate Tenoretic. sent13: something is not a menstruation and does not finger astrakhan if it is a quire. sent14: the cytochrome is musculoskeletal. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a submersible and does not finger astrakhan. sent16: that the cytochrome is not a squeeze is not incorrect if the lamb-chop is a kind of a quire. sent17: if the lamb-chop does not vacate Tenoretic it is not a kind of an indium and it is not a quire. sent18: if that the cytochrome does not ray toleration is not right then that the lamb-chop is a squeeze that does ray toleration is false. sent19: the fact that the cytochrome is not a squeeze and vacates teletypewriter does not hold. sent20: if something is not a quire it is not an indium and it does not ray toleration. sent21: there exists something such that it is not a squeeze. sent22: if something is not Hebridean it is not a squeeze but a quire. sent23: the artery does not vacate teletypewriter and squeezes if the ameba is musculoskeletal. sent24: the larch is not a americium and does not vacate teletypewriter.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lamb-chop is a quire.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the cytochrome is not a squeeze.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the lotus-eater squeezes and it is Hebridean.; int2 -> int3: the lotus-eater is a squeeze.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the artery does not vacate teletypewriter but it is a squeeze is wrong.; sent15 & sent12 -> int5: the ameba vacates Tenoretic.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: that the ameba is musculoskeletal is not wrong.; sent23 & int6 -> int7: the artery does not vacate teletypewriter but it is a kind of a squeeze.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the lamb-chop is not a quire.; sent20 -> int10: if the lamb-chop is not a kind of a quire then it is not an indium and it does not ray toleration.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the amygdalin is not a menstruation and does not finger astrakhan.
sent13 -> int11: if the amygdalin is a quire the fact that it is not a kind of a menstruation and does not finger astrakhan is not false.; sent5 -> int12: if the amygdalin is not Hebridean then it is a quire that does squeeze.;
$hypothesis$ = the lamb-chop is not a kind of an indium and does not ray toleration. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not an indium and it does not ray toleration is not right if that it is a kind of a quire is right. sent2: the ameba does not finger proprioceptor and is diligent. sent3: the ameba does not vacate teletypewriter. sent4: the ameba is an indium if a non-musculoskeletal thing does not ray toleration. sent5: something is a quire and a squeeze if it is not Hebridean. sent6: if the cytochrome is not a kind of a squeeze then the lotus-eater is a squeeze and Hebridean. sent7: something is not a squeeze and it is not musculoskeletal if it is not a kind of a quire. sent8: that the artery does not vacate teletypewriter and is a squeeze is not true if the lotus-eater does squeeze. sent9: if that the lamb-chop either is not an indium or vacates teletypewriter or both is false the fact that the amygdalin is not Hebridean hold. sent10: the ameba is musculoskeletal if it vacates Tenoretic. sent11: if something vacates Tenoretic but it is not a squeeze the lamb-chop does ray toleration. sent12: if something is a kind of nonsubmersible thing that does not finger astrakhan the ameba does vacate Tenoretic. sent13: something is not a menstruation and does not finger astrakhan if it is a quire. sent14: the cytochrome is musculoskeletal. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a submersible and does not finger astrakhan. sent16: that the cytochrome is not a squeeze is not incorrect if the lamb-chop is a kind of a quire. sent17: if the lamb-chop does not vacate Tenoretic it is not a kind of an indium and it is not a quire. sent18: if that the cytochrome does not ray toleration is not right then that the lamb-chop is a squeeze that does ray toleration is false. sent19: the fact that the cytochrome is not a squeeze and vacates teletypewriter does not hold. sent20: if something is not a quire it is not an indium and it does not ray toleration. sent21: there exists something such that it is not a squeeze. sent22: if something is not Hebridean it is not a squeeze but a quire. sent23: the artery does not vacate teletypewriter and squeezes if the ameba is musculoskeletal. sent24: the larch is not a americium and does not vacate teletypewriter. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lamb-chop is a quire.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the cytochrome is not a squeeze.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the lotus-eater squeezes and it is Hebridean.; int2 -> int3: the lotus-eater is a squeeze.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the artery does not vacate teletypewriter but it is a squeeze is wrong.; sent15 & sent12 -> int5: the ameba vacates Tenoretic.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: that the ameba is musculoskeletal is not wrong.; sent23 & int6 -> int7: the artery does not vacate teletypewriter but it is a kind of a squeeze.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the lamb-chop is not a quire.; sent20 -> int10: if the lamb-chop is not a kind of a quire then it is not an indium and it does not ray toleration.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__