if the plasterboard is not serious the fact that that the zeolite is both a chessboard and not virological does not hold is true.
sent1: the fact that the zeolite is a chessboard and virological does not hold. sent2: the fact that the zeolite is a chessboard but it is not virological does not hold if the terreplein is a chessboard. sent3: the fact that the plasterboard does stab acantholysis but it does not condescend is wrong if it is not a guideline. sent4: there exists something such that it is Huxleyan and it does not reconsider. sent5: that the zeolite is a chessboard but it is not chemotherapeutic is not right. sent6: that the terreplein is Huxleyan thing that reconsiders is not correct. sent7: if something is not serious that it is not chemotherapeutic and it is a chessboard is not true. sent8: there exists something such that it is chemotherapeutic. sent9: the cymbal is not chemotherapeutic if there is something such that that it is Huxleyan and does not reconsider is not correct. sent10: the cymbal is not chemotherapeutic if there exists something such that it reconsiders. sent11: something is not serious if the fact that it does not condemn alternation and is virological hold. sent12: if the terreplein is a chessboard the zeolite is a chessboard but it is not virological. sent13: that the zeolite is a chessboard and it is virological does not hold if the plasterboard is not serious. sent14: if the fact that something is not chemotherapeutic but it is a chessboard is not true then it is not semiotic. sent15: if the terreplein is a chessboard the fact that the zeolite is a chessboard that is virological is not true. sent16: the fact that the terreplein is Huxleyan and it does reconsider is wrong if it is not a chessboard. sent17: the fact that the terreplein is Huxleyan and does not reconsider is not correct if it is not a chessboard. sent18: if the plasterboard is not serious the zeolite is a kind of a chessboard that is not virological. sent19: there exists something such that that it is Huxleyan and it reconsiders is not true. sent20: the zeolite is a kind of a chessboard but it is not virological.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the terreplein is not a kind of a chessboard hold.; sent17 & assump2 -> int1: that the terreplein is Huxleyan but it does not reconsider is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that that it is a kind of Huxleyan thing that does not reconsider is correct is not right.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the cymbal is not chemotherapeutic is right.; int3 -> int4: something is not chemotherapeutic.;
the fact that the vessel is semiotic does not hold.
sent14 -> int5: the vessel is not semiotic if that it is non-chemotherapeutic thing that is a chessboard is not correct.; sent7 -> int6: the fact that the vessel is non-chemotherapeutic a chessboard is false if it is not serious.; sent11 -> int7: if the vessel does not condemn alternation but it is virological then it is not serious.;
$hypothesis$ = if the plasterboard is not serious the fact that that the zeolite is both a chessboard and not virological does not hold is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the zeolite is a chessboard and virological does not hold. sent2: the fact that the zeolite is a chessboard but it is not virological does not hold if the terreplein is a chessboard. sent3: the fact that the plasterboard does stab acantholysis but it does not condescend is wrong if it is not a guideline. sent4: there exists something such that it is Huxleyan and it does not reconsider. sent5: that the zeolite is a chessboard but it is not chemotherapeutic is not right. sent6: that the terreplein is Huxleyan thing that reconsiders is not correct. sent7: if something is not serious that it is not chemotherapeutic and it is a chessboard is not true. sent8: there exists something such that it is chemotherapeutic. sent9: the cymbal is not chemotherapeutic if there is something such that that it is Huxleyan and does not reconsider is not correct. sent10: the cymbal is not chemotherapeutic if there exists something such that it reconsiders. sent11: something is not serious if the fact that it does not condemn alternation and is virological hold. sent12: if the terreplein is a chessboard the zeolite is a chessboard but it is not virological. sent13: that the zeolite is a chessboard and it is virological does not hold if the plasterboard is not serious. sent14: if the fact that something is not chemotherapeutic but it is a chessboard is not true then it is not semiotic. sent15: if the terreplein is a chessboard the fact that the zeolite is a chessboard that is virological is not true. sent16: the fact that the terreplein is Huxleyan and it does reconsider is wrong if it is not a chessboard. sent17: the fact that the terreplein is Huxleyan and does not reconsider is not correct if it is not a chessboard. sent18: if the plasterboard is not serious the zeolite is a kind of a chessboard that is not virological. sent19: there exists something such that that it is Huxleyan and it reconsiders is not true. sent20: the zeolite is a kind of a chessboard but it is not virological. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the terreplein is not a kind of a chessboard hold.; sent17 & assump2 -> int1: that the terreplein is Huxleyan but it does not reconsider is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that that it is a kind of Huxleyan thing that does not reconsider is correct is not right.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the cymbal is not chemotherapeutic is right.; int3 -> int4: something is not chemotherapeutic.; __UNKNOWN__