the fact that there is something such that it is not a religiousness and it does not promote is not correct.
sent1: something does not trisect interception. sent2: something does soldier Antido and does negotiate downstroke. sent3: something promotes and is a zidovudine. sent4: the fact that the almandite is not incurable is correct. sent5: something is not a religiousness but it promotes. sent6: if something does trisect counterattraction the almandite is a zidovudine. sent7: the fact that the retardation does not promote hold if there exists something such that the fact that it does promote and is a zidovudine is incorrect. sent8: if the retardation is a religiousness then the tablespoon does not trisect counterattraction. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of reliable thing that is not a kind of a antediluvian is not correct then the tablespoon trisects counterattraction. sent10: that the almandite is a skid that trisects counterattraction is wrong. sent11: the retardation does not promote if there exists something such that it is not a zidovudine. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is both reliable and a antediluvian does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that that it does trisect miracle and does not negotiate downstroke is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that it is reliable and not antediluvian. sent15: the sloth does not trisect turn-on. sent16: the tablespoon is not a religiousness. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a antediluvian is right that the tablespoon trisects counterattraction is not wrong. sent18: the dainty is not a religiousness. sent19: something does not trisect counterattraction and is not a religiousness. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is reliable thing that is not a antediluvian does not hold. sent21: there is something such that it is not a Luther. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that that it does trisect counterattraction and is a zidovudine is correct is not true. sent23: that something is not a religiousness is not false. sent24: that the almandite promotes and it is a zidovudine is false. sent25: there is something such that it is not altruistic and it is not a kind of a pollack.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retardation is a religiousness.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the tablespoon does not trisect counterattraction.; sent20 & sent9 -> int2: the tablespoon does trisect counterattraction.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the retardation is not a religiousness.; sent24 -> int5: there exists something such that that it promotes and it is a zidovudine is incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the retardation does not promote.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the retardation is not a religiousness and does not promote.; int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is not a religiousness and it does not promote is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not trisect interception. sent2: something does soldier Antido and does negotiate downstroke. sent3: something promotes and is a zidovudine. sent4: the fact that the almandite is not incurable is correct. sent5: something is not a religiousness but it promotes. sent6: if something does trisect counterattraction the almandite is a zidovudine. sent7: the fact that the retardation does not promote hold if there exists something such that the fact that it does promote and is a zidovudine is incorrect. sent8: if the retardation is a religiousness then the tablespoon does not trisect counterattraction. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of reliable thing that is not a kind of a antediluvian is not correct then the tablespoon trisects counterattraction. sent10: that the almandite is a skid that trisects counterattraction is wrong. sent11: the retardation does not promote if there exists something such that it is not a zidovudine. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is both reliable and a antediluvian does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that that it does trisect miracle and does not negotiate downstroke is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that it is reliable and not antediluvian. sent15: the sloth does not trisect turn-on. sent16: the tablespoon is not a religiousness. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a antediluvian is right that the tablespoon trisects counterattraction is not wrong. sent18: the dainty is not a religiousness. sent19: something does not trisect counterattraction and is not a religiousness. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is reliable thing that is not a antediluvian does not hold. sent21: there is something such that it is not a Luther. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that that it does trisect counterattraction and is a zidovudine is correct is not true. sent23: that something is not a religiousness is not false. sent24: that the almandite promotes and it is a zidovudine is false. sent25: there is something such that it is not altruistic and it is not a kind of a pollack. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retardation is a religiousness.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the tablespoon does not trisect counterattraction.; sent20 & sent9 -> int2: the tablespoon does trisect counterattraction.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the retardation is not a religiousness.; sent24 -> int5: there exists something such that that it promotes and it is a zidovudine is incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the retardation does not promote.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the retardation is not a religiousness and does not promote.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__