the fact that the arousal is not a agrobiology is right.
sent1: the fact that the Dunkers is not a kind of a streamer but it squires baud is not correct. sent2: if there is something such that that it is a Namibian and a tenebrionid is wrong the Dunkers is a kind of a homestretch. sent3: if something is corporate it is a agrobiology. sent4: the fact that the fact that the arousal is a Namibian and it is a kind of a tenebrionid is not true is correct if it is not corporate. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not squire baud the soutane is a tenebrionid. sent6: the soutane squires baud. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a agrobiology then the mire is not a kind of a homestretch. sent8: the soutane is a agrobiology. sent9: if there exists something such that that it squires baud hold then the fact that the Dunkers does not squires baud and is not a kind of a rhizotomy is not true. sent10: the Dunkers is a colonial and it chelates if it is not a kind of a tetroxide. sent11: something is a kind of a rhizotomy and it is corporate if it is not a homestretch. sent12: something is flaky. sent13: the fact that the fact that the arousal is a agrobiology and is not a kind of a rhizotomy hold is incorrect. sent14: the Dunkers is a kind of a tenebrionid. sent15: the pleaser is not a kind of a rhizotomy. sent16: the fact that if something is a Namibian then the fact that the Dunkers is not Namibian and it is not a kind of a rhizotomy is not true is not incorrect. sent17: if that something is not a streamer but it squires baud is incorrect then it does not squires baud. sent18: something is not a homestretch if that it does not squire baud and is not a rhizotomy is not correct. sent19: the fact that if the Dunkers does not squire baud but it is a colonial the arousal is not a agrobiology is true. sent20: The baud squires soutane.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arousal is not corporate.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the arousal is a kind of a Namibian and it is a tenebrionid is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is Namibian and it is a tenebrionid is not correct.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Dunkers is a homestretch.; sent18 -> int4: if the fact that the Dunkers does not squire baud and it is not a rhizotomy does not hold it is not a homestretch.; sent6 -> int5: there exists something such that it squires baud.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the Dunkers does not squire baud and it is not a kind of a rhizotomy is not correct.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the Dunkers is not a homestretch.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the arousal is corporate.; sent3 -> int10: the fact that the arousal is a kind of a agrobiology is correct if it is corporate.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the mire is a kind of a rhizotomy.
sent11 -> int11: the mire is a rhizotomy and it is corporate if it is not a kind of a homestretch.; sent17 -> int12: if that the Dunkers is not a streamer but it does squire baud is false then it does not squire baud.; int12 & sent1 -> int13: the Dunkers does not squire baud.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the arousal is not a agrobiology is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Dunkers is not a kind of a streamer but it squires baud is not correct. sent2: if there is something such that that it is a Namibian and a tenebrionid is wrong the Dunkers is a kind of a homestretch. sent3: if something is corporate it is a agrobiology. sent4: the fact that the fact that the arousal is a Namibian and it is a kind of a tenebrionid is not true is correct if it is not corporate. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not squire baud the soutane is a tenebrionid. sent6: the soutane squires baud. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a agrobiology then the mire is not a kind of a homestretch. sent8: the soutane is a agrobiology. sent9: if there exists something such that that it squires baud hold then the fact that the Dunkers does not squires baud and is not a kind of a rhizotomy is not true. sent10: the Dunkers is a colonial and it chelates if it is not a kind of a tetroxide. sent11: something is a kind of a rhizotomy and it is corporate if it is not a homestretch. sent12: something is flaky. sent13: the fact that the fact that the arousal is a agrobiology and is not a kind of a rhizotomy hold is incorrect. sent14: the Dunkers is a kind of a tenebrionid. sent15: the pleaser is not a kind of a rhizotomy. sent16: the fact that if something is a Namibian then the fact that the Dunkers is not Namibian and it is not a kind of a rhizotomy is not true is not incorrect. sent17: if that something is not a streamer but it squires baud is incorrect then it does not squires baud. sent18: something is not a homestretch if that it does not squire baud and is not a rhizotomy is not correct. sent19: the fact that if the Dunkers does not squire baud but it is a colonial the arousal is not a agrobiology is true. sent20: The baud squires soutane. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arousal is not corporate.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the arousal is a kind of a Namibian and it is a tenebrionid is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is Namibian and it is a tenebrionid is not correct.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Dunkers is a homestretch.; sent18 -> int4: if the fact that the Dunkers does not squire baud and it is not a rhizotomy does not hold it is not a homestretch.; sent6 -> int5: there exists something such that it squires baud.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the Dunkers does not squire baud and it is not a kind of a rhizotomy is not correct.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the Dunkers is not a homestretch.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the arousal is corporate.; sent3 -> int10: the fact that the arousal is a kind of a agrobiology is correct if it is corporate.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__