the pallium is not non-choral.
sent1: the pallium is not a kind of a salient. sent2: if that something is not a kind of a kiss and is a salient is not right it is not technophilic. sent3: the pallium does not suspend wort if it does not notch fanion and uploads. sent4: if something that is not a kiss is profound then it is non-choral. sent5: the pallium is not a kind of a abfarad. sent6: if the pallium is not a abfarad then it is not non-profound but non-technophilic. sent7: if the pallium does not suspend indomitability then that it is both a interposition and a cobblers does not hold. sent8: something is not a kind of a kiss if the fact that it does notch mutiny and does not suspend wort is not right. sent9: if the pallium is not salient then the fact that it notches mutiny and it does not suspend wort does not hold.
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: that the pallium notches mutiny and does not suspend wort is wrong.; sent8 -> int2: if that the pallium notches mutiny but it does not suspend wort does not hold it is not a kiss.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pallium does not kiss.; sent6 & sent5 -> int4: the pallium is profound but it is not technophilic.; int4 -> int5: the pallium is profound.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the pallium is not a kiss but it is not non-profound.; sent4 -> int7: the pallium is not choral if it is not a kiss but profound.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the animator is not technophilic.
sent2 -> int8: if that the animator is both not a kiss and a salient does not hold then it is not technophilic.;
$hypothesis$ = the pallium is not non-choral. ; $context$ = sent1: the pallium is not a kind of a salient. sent2: if that something is not a kind of a kiss and is a salient is not right it is not technophilic. sent3: the pallium does not suspend wort if it does not notch fanion and uploads. sent4: if something that is not a kiss is profound then it is non-choral. sent5: the pallium is not a kind of a abfarad. sent6: if the pallium is not a abfarad then it is not non-profound but non-technophilic. sent7: if the pallium does not suspend indomitability then that it is both a interposition and a cobblers does not hold. sent8: something is not a kind of a kiss if the fact that it does notch mutiny and does not suspend wort is not right. sent9: if the pallium is not salient then the fact that it notches mutiny and it does not suspend wort does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: that the pallium notches mutiny and does not suspend wort is wrong.; sent8 -> int2: if that the pallium notches mutiny but it does not suspend wort does not hold it is not a kiss.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pallium does not kiss.; sent6 & sent5 -> int4: the pallium is profound but it is not technophilic.; int4 -> int5: the pallium is profound.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the pallium is not a kiss but it is not non-profound.; sent4 -> int7: the pallium is not choral if it is not a kiss but profound.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__