the conglomerate is native.
sent1: if the fact that the animalcule is truthful thing that is a coastguardsman is false the Numidian does not conscript fuel. sent2: the conglomerate is not a walker if the animalcule is a whitewashed and it conscripts fuel. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not non-strategics and it is implacable does not hold. sent4: something is a kind of a gilt or it is not unsuccessful or both if it does not whitewash. sent5: the fact that the Numidian is a gilt is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is strategics but not implacable is false. sent6: if the animalcule does not conscript Podargidae the fact that it is truthful and it is a coastguardsman is false. sent7: if there is something such that that it is not solvent but unholy is incorrect then the animalcule does not conscript Podargidae. sent8: the fact that something is insolvent and not holy does not hold if it is a cordage. sent9: the animalcule does conscript fuel. sent10: if the neurogliacyte is not a native it is not a kind of a pea-souper. sent11: there is something such that it is successful. sent12: there exists something such that that it conscripts fuel and it is successful is false. sent13: something is both strategics and not implacable. sent14: if the fact that something is both a walker and a whitewashed does not hold the fact that it does not whitewashed is right. sent15: everything is a cordage. sent16: there is something such that that it is strategics and is not implacable is not right. sent17: if something that is successful is a gilt then the animalcule whitewashes. sent18: The fuel does conscript animalcule. sent19: if the conglomerate is not a walker it is not a native. sent20: something is a gilt and is a kind of a context if it is not successful. sent21: the Numidian does not conscript fuel. sent22: if the animalcule is not a walker then the fact that the Numidian is not a kind of a native and does not conscript fuel does not hold. sent23: the Numidian is a gilt if there exists something such that it is not strategics. sent24: the Numidian is successful. sent25: that something is a gilt hold. sent26: the conglomerate conscripts fuel if the fact that that the fact that the Numidian is not native and it does not conscripts fuel is correct does not hold hold. sent27: the animalcule is not a walker if it is non-truthful thing that is a coastguardsman.
sent16 & sent5 -> int1: the Numidian is a kind of a gilt.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the Numidian is successful and it is a kind of a gilt.; int2 -> int3: something is successful and it is a gilt.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the animalcule whitewashes.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the animalcule does whitewash and it does conscript fuel.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the conglomerate is not a walker is correct.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
that the conglomerate is a context is correct.
sent20 -> int7: if the conglomerate is not successful it is a gilt and it is a context.;
$hypothesis$ = the conglomerate is native. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the animalcule is truthful thing that is a coastguardsman is false the Numidian does not conscript fuel. sent2: the conglomerate is not a walker if the animalcule is a whitewashed and it conscripts fuel. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not non-strategics and it is implacable does not hold. sent4: something is a kind of a gilt or it is not unsuccessful or both if it does not whitewash. sent5: the fact that the Numidian is a gilt is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is strategics but not implacable is false. sent6: if the animalcule does not conscript Podargidae the fact that it is truthful and it is a coastguardsman is false. sent7: if there is something such that that it is not solvent but unholy is incorrect then the animalcule does not conscript Podargidae. sent8: the fact that something is insolvent and not holy does not hold if it is a cordage. sent9: the animalcule does conscript fuel. sent10: if the neurogliacyte is not a native it is not a kind of a pea-souper. sent11: there is something such that it is successful. sent12: there exists something such that that it conscripts fuel and it is successful is false. sent13: something is both strategics and not implacable. sent14: if the fact that something is both a walker and a whitewashed does not hold the fact that it does not whitewashed is right. sent15: everything is a cordage. sent16: there is something such that that it is strategics and is not implacable is not right. sent17: if something that is successful is a gilt then the animalcule whitewashes. sent18: The fuel does conscript animalcule. sent19: if the conglomerate is not a walker it is not a native. sent20: something is a gilt and is a kind of a context if it is not successful. sent21: the Numidian does not conscript fuel. sent22: if the animalcule is not a walker then the fact that the Numidian is not a kind of a native and does not conscript fuel does not hold. sent23: the Numidian is a gilt if there exists something such that it is not strategics. sent24: the Numidian is successful. sent25: that something is a gilt hold. sent26: the conglomerate conscripts fuel if the fact that that the fact that the Numidian is not native and it does not conscripts fuel is correct does not hold hold. sent27: the animalcule is not a walker if it is non-truthful thing that is a coastguardsman. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent5 -> int1: the Numidian is a kind of a gilt.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the Numidian is successful and it is a kind of a gilt.; int2 -> int3: something is successful and it is a gilt.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the animalcule whitewashes.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the animalcule does whitewash and it does conscript fuel.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the conglomerate is not a walker is correct.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__