the nape is a triiodothyronine.
sent1: the goddaughter is a perpendicular if the shrike is a kind of a malocclusion. sent2: the dodder is not a patch if there is something such that it is not a floating and not coastal. sent3: if the dodder does float the nape is a triiodothyronine. sent4: if the shrike is an official it is numerical. sent5: if the goddaughter is a perpendicular that the dodder does patch and it is coastal is not correct. sent6: the shrike is not numerical. sent7: the fact that the dodder does not patch but it is coastal does not hold if the goddaughter is a perpendicular. sent8: the shrike is not a malocclusion but official if the goddaughter is not numerical. sent9: if the dodder does patch then it floats. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it recombines Leakey and it is coastal is wrong. sent11: that the dodder is a patch and it is coastal does not hold. sent12: if the shrike is not a malocclusion then it is official. sent13: that something is numerical and it is a perpendicular is not true if it is not a kind of a patch. sent14: the goddaughter is coastal. sent15: the Mohawk is not a kind of a floating if the brassiere floating and it is xerographic. sent16: if that the dodder does not patch but it is not non-coastal is not true then it is a kind of a floating. sent17: the brassiere does float and is xerographic. sent18: the Mohawk is not coastal if there exists something such that the fact that it recombines Leakey and it is coastal is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the shrike is not a malocclusion is correct.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the shrike is official.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the shrike is numerical.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shrike is a kind of a malocclusion.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the goddaughter is a perpendicular.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the dodder does not patch but it is coastal does not hold.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the dodder does float.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the nape is not a triiodothyronine.
sent13 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the dodder is numerical and it is a kind of a perpendicular does not hold is right if it does not patch.; sent15 & sent17 -> int9: that the Mohawk is not a floating is right.; sent10 & sent18 -> int10: the Mohawk is not coastal.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Mohawk is both not a floating and not coastal.; int11 -> int12: that something does not float and is not coastal is not incorrect.; int12 & sent2 -> int13: the dodder does not patch.; int8 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the dodder is numerical and it is perpendicular is not correct.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it is numerical and it is perpendicular is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the nape is a triiodothyronine. ; $context$ = sent1: the goddaughter is a perpendicular if the shrike is a kind of a malocclusion. sent2: the dodder is not a patch if there is something such that it is not a floating and not coastal. sent3: if the dodder does float the nape is a triiodothyronine. sent4: if the shrike is an official it is numerical. sent5: if the goddaughter is a perpendicular that the dodder does patch and it is coastal is not correct. sent6: the shrike is not numerical. sent7: the fact that the dodder does not patch but it is coastal does not hold if the goddaughter is a perpendicular. sent8: the shrike is not a malocclusion but official if the goddaughter is not numerical. sent9: if the dodder does patch then it floats. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it recombines Leakey and it is coastal is wrong. sent11: that the dodder is a patch and it is coastal does not hold. sent12: if the shrike is not a malocclusion then it is official. sent13: that something is numerical and it is a perpendicular is not true if it is not a kind of a patch. sent14: the goddaughter is coastal. sent15: the Mohawk is not a kind of a floating if the brassiere floating and it is xerographic. sent16: if that the dodder does not patch but it is not non-coastal is not true then it is a kind of a floating. sent17: the brassiere does float and is xerographic. sent18: the Mohawk is not coastal if there exists something such that the fact that it recombines Leakey and it is coastal is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the shrike is not a malocclusion is correct.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the shrike is official.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the shrike is numerical.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shrike is a kind of a malocclusion.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the goddaughter is a perpendicular.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the dodder does not patch but it is coastal does not hold.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the dodder does float.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__