if the intercostal happens the antiquating happens.
sent1: if the fact that the darting and the non-intercostalness happens is not correct then the antiquating happens. sent2: if the darting happens then the eponymousness and the non-canalicularness happens. sent3: if the darting and the non-intercostalness occurs the antiquating happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the darting and the non-intercostalness happens.; assump1 -> int1: that the intercostalness does not occur is not incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the intercostal happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that both the dart and the non-intercostalness happens does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the antiquating happens.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
both the eponymousness and the non-canalicularness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the intercostal happens the antiquating happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the darting and the non-intercostalness happens is not correct then the antiquating happens. sent2: if the darting happens then the eponymousness and the non-canalicularness happens. sent3: if the darting and the non-intercostalness occurs the antiquating happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the darting and the non-intercostalness happens.; assump1 -> int1: that the intercostalness does not occur is not incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the intercostal happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that both the dart and the non-intercostalness happens does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the antiquating happens.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__