the fact that the divergence occurs but the gastroscopy does not occur is not right.
sent1: that the gastroscopy does not occur is triggered by that the urging does not occur. sent2: the planographicness and the impregnation happens. sent3: both the divergence and the judgment happens. sent4: that the couture and the refraining Jacobs happens is brought about by that the lapidifying does not occur. sent5: the summarization does not occur. sent6: the urging causes that the couture does not occur and the refraining lodgment does not occur. sent7: the catalecticness occurs. sent8: that both the beetle and the nonpoliticalness happens is correct if the nonadhesiveness does not occur. sent9: the lapidifying does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the urging occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the couture does not occur and the refraining lodgment does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the couture does not occur.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: both the couture and the refraining Jacobs happens.; int3 -> int4: the couture happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the urging does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the gastroscopy does not occur is right.; sent3 -> int8: that the divergence happens hold.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the divergence occurs but the gastroscopy does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the gastroscopy does not occur is triggered by that the urging does not occur. sent2: the planographicness and the impregnation happens. sent3: both the divergence and the judgment happens. sent4: that the couture and the refraining Jacobs happens is brought about by that the lapidifying does not occur. sent5: the summarization does not occur. sent6: the urging causes that the couture does not occur and the refraining lodgment does not occur. sent7: the catalecticness occurs. sent8: that both the beetle and the nonpoliticalness happens is correct if the nonadhesiveness does not occur. sent9: the lapidifying does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the urging occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the couture does not occur and the refraining lodgment does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the couture does not occur.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: both the couture and the refraining Jacobs happens.; int3 -> int4: the couture happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the urging does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the gastroscopy does not occur is right.; sent3 -> int8: that the divergence happens hold.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__