the nook is not a kind of an android.
sent1: there exists something such that that the fact that it is consonantal and canes Myrtus hold is wrong. sent2: the crevasse is perceptive. sent3: if the fact that the chatterer is anemometric and it is a bars does not hold then the crevasse is not a bars. sent4: if the fact that something is not subclavian and it is not contralateral does not hold it is subclavian. sent5: the fact that the whitethorn does not cane Myrtus is not false if there is something such that the fact that it is both perceptive and not non-dactylic does not hold. sent6: the fact that the crevasse is not subclavian but it is consonantal is wrong. sent7: the whitethorn is not an android. sent8: if the crevasse is consonantal the nook is an android. sent9: the crevasse does loom worn. sent10: the crevasse canes Myrtus if the jack-in-the-pulpit is consonantal. sent11: if the jack-in-the-pulpit canes Myrtus the whitethorn is not non-subclavian. sent12: that the jack-in-the-pulpit does not cane Myrtus but it is subclavian is not correct if the whitethorn does not cane Myrtus. sent13: something is both perceptive and dactylic. sent14: that the nook does cane Myrtus and is an android is not true if the whitethorn does not cane Myrtus. sent15: the crevasse does not cane Myrtus if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is an android that is consonantal is right does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the jack-in-the-pulpit does not cane Myrtus and is subclavian is not correct the crevasse is consonantal. sent17: the crevasse is not an android if there is something such that the fact that it is consonantal thing that canes Myrtus is not right. sent18: if the whitethorn is not a kind of an android but it is consonantal the nook is not an android. sent19: if the jack-in-the-pulpit canes Myrtus the whitethorn is not an android and is consonantal. sent20: if something is not a bars the fact that it is not subclavian and it is not contralateral does not hold. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is perceptive and it is dactylic is false. sent22: if there is something such that that it is an android and it is consonantal is not right then the fact that the nook does not cane Myrtus is right. sent23: the nook does not cane Myrtus if there exists something such that it is not an android.
sent21 & sent5 -> int1: that the whitethorn does not cane Myrtus is correct.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the fact that that the fact that the jack-in-the-pulpit does not cane Myrtus but it is subclavian is right is not correct is correct.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the crevasse is consonantal.; sent8 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the nook is not an android.
sent4 -> int4: if the fact that the crevasse is not subclavian and is not contralateral is not correct it is subclavian.; sent20 -> int5: that the fact that the crevasse is both non-subclavian and non-contralateral is wrong is right if it does not bar.;
$hypothesis$ = the nook is not a kind of an android. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that the fact that it is consonantal and canes Myrtus hold is wrong. sent2: the crevasse is perceptive. sent3: if the fact that the chatterer is anemometric and it is a bars does not hold then the crevasse is not a bars. sent4: if the fact that something is not subclavian and it is not contralateral does not hold it is subclavian. sent5: the fact that the whitethorn does not cane Myrtus is not false if there is something such that the fact that it is both perceptive and not non-dactylic does not hold. sent6: the fact that the crevasse is not subclavian but it is consonantal is wrong. sent7: the whitethorn is not an android. sent8: if the crevasse is consonantal the nook is an android. sent9: the crevasse does loom worn. sent10: the crevasse canes Myrtus if the jack-in-the-pulpit is consonantal. sent11: if the jack-in-the-pulpit canes Myrtus the whitethorn is not non-subclavian. sent12: that the jack-in-the-pulpit does not cane Myrtus but it is subclavian is not correct if the whitethorn does not cane Myrtus. sent13: something is both perceptive and dactylic. sent14: that the nook does cane Myrtus and is an android is not true if the whitethorn does not cane Myrtus. sent15: the crevasse does not cane Myrtus if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is an android that is consonantal is right does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the jack-in-the-pulpit does not cane Myrtus and is subclavian is not correct the crevasse is consonantal. sent17: the crevasse is not an android if there is something such that the fact that it is consonantal thing that canes Myrtus is not right. sent18: if the whitethorn is not a kind of an android but it is consonantal the nook is not an android. sent19: if the jack-in-the-pulpit canes Myrtus the whitethorn is not an android and is consonantal. sent20: if something is not a bars the fact that it is not subclavian and it is not contralateral does not hold. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is perceptive and it is dactylic is false. sent22: if there is something such that that it is an android and it is consonantal is not right then the fact that the nook does not cane Myrtus is right. sent23: the nook does not cane Myrtus if there exists something such that it is not an android. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent5 -> int1: that the whitethorn does not cane Myrtus is correct.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the fact that that the fact that the jack-in-the-pulpit does not cane Myrtus but it is subclavian is right is not correct is correct.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the crevasse is consonantal.; sent8 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__