the destroyer is indecent if the hellbender is proximal.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a services and it is a dragoon is incorrect. sent2: the hellbender does outgrow counterfeit. sent3: if the destroyer is proximal then the fact that the hellbender does outgrow counterfeit is not false. sent4: that the destroyer outgrows counterfeit and is indecent is false. sent5: if the hellbender is indecent then the destroyer is not non-proximal. sent6: there exists something such that that it outgrows counterfeit and it is indecent is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not outgrow counterfeit and is proximal is not correct. sent8: the hellbender is non-proximal if something does not outgrow counterfeit and is indecent. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-indecent thing that does outgrow counterfeit is incorrect then the destroyer is not proximal. sent10: the shark is not indecent. sent11: the downdraft is indecent. sent12: there exists something such that it does outgrow counterfeit. sent13: the destroyer is not proximal. sent14: that something is not an apricot but it is a hymnal is not incorrect. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is not indecent and it is proximal is not correct. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not proximal and it is indecent does not hold the destroyer does not outgrow counterfeit.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the destroyer does not outgrow counterfeit and is indecent does not hold.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not outgrow counterfeit and it is indecent does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the destroyer is indecent if the hellbender is proximal. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a services and it is a dragoon is incorrect. sent2: the hellbender does outgrow counterfeit. sent3: if the destroyer is proximal then the fact that the hellbender does outgrow counterfeit is not false. sent4: that the destroyer outgrows counterfeit and is indecent is false. sent5: if the hellbender is indecent then the destroyer is not non-proximal. sent6: there exists something such that that it outgrows counterfeit and it is indecent is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not outgrow counterfeit and is proximal is not correct. sent8: the hellbender is non-proximal if something does not outgrow counterfeit and is indecent. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-indecent thing that does outgrow counterfeit is incorrect then the destroyer is not proximal. sent10: the shark is not indecent. sent11: the downdraft is indecent. sent12: there exists something such that it does outgrow counterfeit. sent13: the destroyer is not proximal. sent14: that something is not an apricot but it is a hymnal is not incorrect. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is not indecent and it is proximal is not correct. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not proximal and it is indecent does not hold the destroyer does not outgrow counterfeit. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the destroyer does not outgrow counterfeit and is indecent does not hold.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not outgrow counterfeit and it is indecent does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__