the chow is not deep-sea.
sent1: if the fact that the ester is not a kind of a portiere is right then the fact that the surety is both reactive and eschatological is not right. sent2: if the chow does not premeditate valued or bands consultancy or both then it is not a deep-sea. sent3: the fact that the codpiece is not a psychopomp or it does band consultancy or both is not correct. sent4: if the Kirghiz is a kind of a portiere and it is a kind of a loom the ester is not a portiere. sent5: the codpiece is a kind of a deep-sea if the surety is a kind of a cruse. sent6: the Kirghiz is a portiere if it is centigrade. sent7: the Kirghiz is centigrade. sent8: if the chow is not a psychopomp it premeditates valued or it does destain or both. sent9: the fact that the domestic does not premeditate valued is true if it is not a foghorn and/or it is a kind of a one-seventh. sent10: either something does not premeditate valued or it destains or both if it is not a psychopomp. sent11: if that something is not unreactive and is eschatological is false then it is unreactive. sent12: the fact that the Kirghiz is not a march and is not a loom is wrong. sent13: if the codpiece is not a cruse that the chow is deep-sea and it is a kind of a psychopomp is not false. sent14: if the fact that the codpiece is not a psychopomp and/or bands consultancy does not hold the chow is not a psychopomp. sent15: if the chow does not premeditate valued or it does destain or both it is not a kind of a deep-sea. sent16: if the fact that something is not a kind of a march and is not a loom is wrong it is a loom. sent17: the fact that something is a preparation but it does not band consultancy is not right if it is unreactive.
sent10 -> int1: if the chow is not a psychopomp then it does not premeditate valued or destains or both.; sent14 & sent3 -> int2: the chow is not a psychopomp.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chow does not premeditate valued and/or it does destain.; int3 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the pinger is not a kind of a psychopomp.
$hypothesis$ = the chow is not deep-sea. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the ester is not a kind of a portiere is right then the fact that the surety is both reactive and eschatological is not right. sent2: if the chow does not premeditate valued or bands consultancy or both then it is not a deep-sea. sent3: the fact that the codpiece is not a psychopomp or it does band consultancy or both is not correct. sent4: if the Kirghiz is a kind of a portiere and it is a kind of a loom the ester is not a portiere. sent5: the codpiece is a kind of a deep-sea if the surety is a kind of a cruse. sent6: the Kirghiz is a portiere if it is centigrade. sent7: the Kirghiz is centigrade. sent8: if the chow is not a psychopomp it premeditates valued or it does destain or both. sent9: the fact that the domestic does not premeditate valued is true if it is not a foghorn and/or it is a kind of a one-seventh. sent10: either something does not premeditate valued or it destains or both if it is not a psychopomp. sent11: if that something is not unreactive and is eschatological is false then it is unreactive. sent12: the fact that the Kirghiz is not a march and is not a loom is wrong. sent13: if the codpiece is not a cruse that the chow is deep-sea and it is a kind of a psychopomp is not false. sent14: if the fact that the codpiece is not a psychopomp and/or bands consultancy does not hold the chow is not a psychopomp. sent15: if the chow does not premeditate valued or it does destain or both it is not a kind of a deep-sea. sent16: if the fact that something is not a kind of a march and is not a loom is wrong it is a loom. sent17: the fact that something is a preparation but it does not band consultancy is not right if it is unreactive. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the chow is not a psychopomp then it does not premeditate valued or destains or both.; sent14 & sent3 -> int2: the chow is not a psychopomp.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chow does not premeditate valued and/or it does destain.; int3 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__