the fact that the rushlight is not intrusive and it does not interfere mainstream is not true.
sent1: something does not escort candy. sent2: the rushlight does not compress. sent3: that the rushlight is a laurel hold. sent4: the rushlight is unintrusive if there is something such that that it is a Bermudan and it does interfere casualness is not true. sent5: the rushlight is unintrusive if there is something such that it does not interfere casualness. sent6: the rushlight does not interfere mainstream and is a laurel. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Bermudan and it interferes casualness is not correct the shoulder does not interfere mainstream. sent8: the rushlight is not a waterpower. sent9: if there is something such that it does not escort candy then the fact that the shoulder is a Bermudan and does interfere casualness is not right.
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the shoulder is a kind of a Bermudan and interferes casualness does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a Bermudan and it does interfere casualness does not hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the rushlight is not intrusive.; sent6 -> int4: the rushlight does not interfere mainstream.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the rushlight is not intrusive and it does not interfere mainstream is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not escort candy. sent2: the rushlight does not compress. sent3: that the rushlight is a laurel hold. sent4: the rushlight is unintrusive if there is something such that that it is a Bermudan and it does interfere casualness is not true. sent5: the rushlight is unintrusive if there is something such that it does not interfere casualness. sent6: the rushlight does not interfere mainstream and is a laurel. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Bermudan and it interferes casualness is not correct the shoulder does not interfere mainstream. sent8: the rushlight is not a waterpower. sent9: if there is something such that it does not escort candy then the fact that the shoulder is a Bermudan and does interfere casualness is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the shoulder is a kind of a Bermudan and interferes casualness does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a Bermudan and it does interfere casualness does not hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the rushlight is not intrusive.; sent6 -> int4: the rushlight does not interfere mainstream.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__