the fact that the fact that the probing and the non-connotativeness happens is not correct if the Post happens is not right.
sent1: that that the yielding keratoscopy occurs and the seminar occurs is not incorrect is false. sent2: if the probing happens and the connotativeness does not occur the Post does not occur. sent3: if the Hunt occurs but the jobbing Marshall does not occur then the humbug does not occur. sent4: the domesticating does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the probe and the non-connotativeness occurs.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the Post does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Post occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the probe but not the connotativeness occurs is not correct.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the probing and the non-connotativeness happens is not correct if the Post happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the yielding keratoscopy occurs and the seminar occurs is not incorrect is false. sent2: if the probing happens and the connotativeness does not occur the Post does not occur. sent3: if the Hunt occurs but the jobbing Marshall does not occur then the humbug does not occur. sent4: the domesticating does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the probe and the non-connotativeness occurs.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the Post does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Post occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the probe but not the connotativeness occurs is not correct.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__