the fact that the chalaza is not a kind of a indispensability but it is a kind of a millenary hold.
sent1: if the murine is a kind of non-explosive thing that does train then it is not millenary. sent2: that the chalaza is not a indispensability is not incorrect. sent3: the gasbag is not Lusitanian if the thumbscrew pipes and it does accrete gasbag. sent4: the gasbag is a indispensability and it is a trundle if it is not Lusitanian. sent5: everything is not explosive but a trained. sent6: the chalaza is not a indispensability but it is a millenary if the murine is not a millenary.
sent5 -> int1: the murine is not a kind of an explosive but it is a kind of a trained.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the murine is not millenary.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the chalaza is not a indispensability but millenary is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chalaza is not a kind of a indispensability but it is a kind of a millenary hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the murine is a kind of non-explosive thing that does train then it is not millenary. sent2: that the chalaza is not a indispensability is not incorrect. sent3: the gasbag is not Lusitanian if the thumbscrew pipes and it does accrete gasbag. sent4: the gasbag is a indispensability and it is a trundle if it is not Lusitanian. sent5: everything is not explosive but a trained. sent6: the chalaza is not a indispensability but it is a millenary if the murine is not a millenary. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the murine is not a kind of an explosive but it is a kind of a trained.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the murine is not millenary.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__