the catcher does not sporulate.
sent1: if that something is not breathless but a saver does not hold then it does not sporulate. sent2: if something is breathless then the fact that it is a saver hold. sent3: the cufflink does not ape cicerone and is not an infrastructure. sent4: if the cufflink is not a kind of a spirometer the fact that the catcher is not breathless but it is a saver does not hold. sent5: something is a spirometer if it is a kind of a saver. sent6: if the cufflink does not ape cicerone and is not an infrastructure then it is breathless. sent7: the fact that the catcher sporulates is right if something is a kind of a spirometer or it does not squawk misuse or both.
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the cufflink is breathless.; sent2 -> int2: the cufflink is a saver if it is breathless.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cufflink is a kind of a saver.; sent5 -> int4: the cufflink is a spirometer if it is a saver.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cufflink is a spirometer.; int5 -> int6: the cufflink is a spirometer and/or it does not squawk misuse.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a spirometer and/or it does not squawk misuse.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the catcher does not sporulate.
sent1 -> int8: if the fact that the catcher is not breathless but it is a kind of a saver is incorrect it does not sporulate.;
$hypothesis$ = the catcher does not sporulate. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not breathless but a saver does not hold then it does not sporulate. sent2: if something is breathless then the fact that it is a saver hold. sent3: the cufflink does not ape cicerone and is not an infrastructure. sent4: if the cufflink is not a kind of a spirometer the fact that the catcher is not breathless but it is a saver does not hold. sent5: something is a spirometer if it is a kind of a saver. sent6: if the cufflink does not ape cicerone and is not an infrastructure then it is breathless. sent7: the fact that the catcher sporulates is right if something is a kind of a spirometer or it does not squawk misuse or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the cufflink is breathless.; sent2 -> int2: the cufflink is a saver if it is breathless.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cufflink is a kind of a saver.; sent5 -> int4: the cufflink is a spirometer if it is a saver.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cufflink is a spirometer.; int5 -> int6: the cufflink is a spirometer and/or it does not squawk misuse.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a spirometer and/or it does not squawk misuse.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__