if the operation does not occur then the divaricating probability happens.
sent1: not the interpellation but the extortion happens. sent2: the immunoassay does not occur if the casing mercy does not occur and the lengthwiseness does not occur. sent3: if not the immunoassay but the vascularness occurs the operation occurs. sent4: the immunoassay does not occur if the casing mercy does not occur but the lengthwiseness occurs. sent5: that not the interpellation but the extortion happens results in that the intelligibleness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the divaricating probability occurs is not false if both the non-vascularness and the non-intelligibleness occurs. sent7: the casing mercy does not occur and the lengthwiseness does not occur.
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the immunoassay does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vascularness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the immunoassay does not occur and the vascularness happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the operation occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the operation does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the vascularness does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int6: that the intelligibleness does not occur is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the vascularness does not occur and the intelligibleness does not occur.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the divaricating probability happens.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the operation does not occur then the divaricating probability happens. ; $context$ = sent1: not the interpellation but the extortion happens. sent2: the immunoassay does not occur if the casing mercy does not occur and the lengthwiseness does not occur. sent3: if not the immunoassay but the vascularness occurs the operation occurs. sent4: the immunoassay does not occur if the casing mercy does not occur but the lengthwiseness occurs. sent5: that not the interpellation but the extortion happens results in that the intelligibleness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the divaricating probability occurs is not false if both the non-vascularness and the non-intelligibleness occurs. sent7: the casing mercy does not occur and the lengthwiseness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the immunoassay does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vascularness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the immunoassay does not occur and the vascularness happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the operation occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the operation does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the vascularness does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int6: that the intelligibleness does not occur is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the vascularness does not occur and the intelligibleness does not occur.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the divaricating probability happens.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__