that not the nay but the no-hitter occurs is not right.
sent1: the fact that the squishing does not occur and the camouflaging Titanosaurus does not occur is not right if the displeasing occurs. sent2: that the nay does not occur hold if that the squishing does not occur and the camouflaging Titanosaurus does not occur is not true. sent3: the nay does not occur. sent4: that the compromising happens is prevented by the non-benzenoidness. sent5: the squish is caused by that the nay happens and the no-hitter occurs. sent6: that the laminectomy and the camouflaging bantam happens is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the laminectomy happens and the camouflaging bantam occurs is false the camouflaging bantam does not occur. sent8: that both the nay and the no-hitter happens is not right. sent9: if the nay does not occur but the no-hitter happens then the squishing happens. sent10: the camouflaging Titanosaurus occurs if the squishing occurs but the camouflaging bantam does not occur. sent11: that the compromise does not occur but the benzenoidness occurs yields that the camouflaging Titanosaurus does not occur. sent12: the compromising does not occur. sent13: not the compromise but the benzenoidness occurs. sent14: the camouflaging Titanosaurus is prevented by that the compromise and the benzenoidness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nay does not occur and the no-hitter occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the squishing happens.; sent7 & sent6 -> int2: that the camouflaging bantam does not occur is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the squish but not the camouflaging bantam happens.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the camouflaging Titanosaurus happens.; sent11 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the camouflaging Titanosaurus does not occur is not wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
not the nay but the no-hitter happens.
$hypothesis$ = that not the nay but the no-hitter occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the squishing does not occur and the camouflaging Titanosaurus does not occur is not right if the displeasing occurs. sent2: that the nay does not occur hold if that the squishing does not occur and the camouflaging Titanosaurus does not occur is not true. sent3: the nay does not occur. sent4: that the compromising happens is prevented by the non-benzenoidness. sent5: the squish is caused by that the nay happens and the no-hitter occurs. sent6: that the laminectomy and the camouflaging bantam happens is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the laminectomy happens and the camouflaging bantam occurs is false the camouflaging bantam does not occur. sent8: that both the nay and the no-hitter happens is not right. sent9: if the nay does not occur but the no-hitter happens then the squishing happens. sent10: the camouflaging Titanosaurus occurs if the squishing occurs but the camouflaging bantam does not occur. sent11: that the compromise does not occur but the benzenoidness occurs yields that the camouflaging Titanosaurus does not occur. sent12: the compromising does not occur. sent13: not the compromise but the benzenoidness occurs. sent14: the camouflaging Titanosaurus is prevented by that the compromise and the benzenoidness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nay does not occur and the no-hitter occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the squishing happens.; sent7 & sent6 -> int2: that the camouflaging bantam does not occur is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the squish but not the camouflaging bantam happens.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the camouflaging Titanosaurus happens.; sent11 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the camouflaging Titanosaurus does not occur is not wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__