the guayule is inductive and it is a kind of a hagiology.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not a hatchway. sent2: if the guayule is not oropharyngeal but it is protozoological it recesses. sent3: that the guayule is Cambodian and it is a recessed is not true. sent4: something that does recess is a parallelogram. sent5: that the fact that the guayule is a kind of an intermediate and it is knowable is not right is true if there is something such that it is not knowable. sent6: the fact that the plethysmograph is oropharyngeal if that the fact that the plethysmograph is not a kind of a parallelogram or is not an upgrade or both is not false does not hold is not false. sent7: the fact that the fact that the plethysmograph is not a parallelogram and/or does not upgrade is not correct is not incorrect. sent8: there are non-knowable things. sent9: if the guayule does not incriminate reason the fact that it is inductive thing that is a hagiology is incorrect. sent10: the gamp is not a parallelogram but it does recess if it is not an upgrade. sent11: the guayule is protozoological if there is something such that it is not a kind of a hatchway. sent12: the guayule is a kind of an upgrade. sent13: something does not incriminate reason if it is a parallelogram and upgrades. sent14: the feminist does not recess. sent15: that if something does recess that it is oropharyngeal and is non-protozoological is incorrect is not wrong. sent16: if that something is both an intermediate and knowable is false then it is not oropharyngeal.
sent16 -> int1: the guayule is not oropharyngeal if the fact that it is an intermediate and it is knowable does not hold.; sent8 & sent5 -> int2: that the guayule is a kind of an intermediate that is knowable is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the guayule is non-oropharyngeal.; sent1 & sent11 -> int4: the guayule is protozoological.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the guayule is both not oropharyngeal and protozoological.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the guayule does recess.; sent4 -> int7: if the guayule does recess it is a parallelogram.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the guayule is a kind of a parallelogram.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the guayule is a parallelogram that is an upgrade.; sent13 -> int10: the guayule does not incriminate reason if it is a kind of a parallelogram and upgrades.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the guayule does not incriminate reason.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the guayule is a kind of inductive thing that is a hagiology.
sent6 & sent7 -> int12: the plethysmograph is oropharyngeal.; int12 -> int13: something is oropharyngeal.;
$hypothesis$ = the guayule is inductive and it is a kind of a hagiology. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a hatchway. sent2: if the guayule is not oropharyngeal but it is protozoological it recesses. sent3: that the guayule is Cambodian and it is a recessed is not true. sent4: something that does recess is a parallelogram. sent5: that the fact that the guayule is a kind of an intermediate and it is knowable is not right is true if there is something such that it is not knowable. sent6: the fact that the plethysmograph is oropharyngeal if that the fact that the plethysmograph is not a kind of a parallelogram or is not an upgrade or both is not false does not hold is not false. sent7: the fact that the fact that the plethysmograph is not a parallelogram and/or does not upgrade is not correct is not incorrect. sent8: there are non-knowable things. sent9: if the guayule does not incriminate reason the fact that it is inductive thing that is a hagiology is incorrect. sent10: the gamp is not a parallelogram but it does recess if it is not an upgrade. sent11: the guayule is protozoological if there is something such that it is not a kind of a hatchway. sent12: the guayule is a kind of an upgrade. sent13: something does not incriminate reason if it is a parallelogram and upgrades. sent14: the feminist does not recess. sent15: that if something does recess that it is oropharyngeal and is non-protozoological is incorrect is not wrong. sent16: if that something is both an intermediate and knowable is false then it is not oropharyngeal. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the guayule is not oropharyngeal if the fact that it is an intermediate and it is knowable does not hold.; sent8 & sent5 -> int2: that the guayule is a kind of an intermediate that is knowable is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the guayule is non-oropharyngeal.; sent1 & sent11 -> int4: the guayule is protozoological.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the guayule is both not oropharyngeal and protozoological.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the guayule does recess.; sent4 -> int7: if the guayule does recess it is a parallelogram.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the guayule is a kind of a parallelogram.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the guayule is a parallelogram that is an upgrade.; sent13 -> int10: the guayule does not incriminate reason if it is a kind of a parallelogram and upgrades.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the guayule does not incriminate reason.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__