that there is something such that if the fact that it is both invisible and not a carrizo is not correct it is unmindful is not right.
sent1: the Croatian is a put if that it is genic and it is not visible is not true. sent2: if the Croatian is not visible and it is not a carrizo it is unmindful. sent3: if something is not visible and is not a carrizo then it is unmindful. sent4: if the fact that something is a kind of visible thing that is not a carrizo does not hold that it is unmindful is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not visible and it is not a carrizo then it is unmindful. sent6: there exists something such that if that it does dart burl and is not bicapsular is wrong it does bunker. sent7: if that something is not visible and it is not a carrizo is wrong then it is unmindful.
sent7 -> int1: the Croatian is unmindful if the fact that it is not visible and it is not a carrizo is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it is both invisible and not a carrizo is not correct it is unmindful is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the Croatian is a put if that it is genic and it is not visible is not true. sent2: if the Croatian is not visible and it is not a carrizo it is unmindful. sent3: if something is not visible and is not a carrizo then it is unmindful. sent4: if the fact that something is a kind of visible thing that is not a carrizo does not hold that it is unmindful is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not visible and it is not a carrizo then it is unmindful. sent6: there exists something such that if that it does dart burl and is not bicapsular is wrong it does bunker. sent7: if that something is not visible and it is not a carrizo is wrong then it is unmindful. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the Croatian is unmindful if the fact that it is not visible and it is not a carrizo is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__