the hoya is untheatrical but it is not a plover.
sent1: if the tachymeter does not riposte Ukrainian that the stole is a kind of a group and does not riposte Ukrainian does not hold. sent2: the joist is not difficult. sent3: if the tachymeter is not a catalyst it is difficult and it is not a luminosity. sent4: the tachymeter does not riposte Ukrainian if it is bionic and it is a kind of a catalyst. sent5: if the pinesap is not exodontics the hoya is both untheatrical and not a plover. sent6: the pinesap is not exodontics if that the stole is a kind of a group that does not riposte Ukrainian is not correct. sent7: the fact that the tachymeter is both difficult and not a luminosity is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tachymeter is not a catalyst.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the tachymeter is difficult and is not a luminosity.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the tachymeter is a catalyst hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the hoya is untheatrical but it is not a plover. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tachymeter does not riposte Ukrainian that the stole is a kind of a group and does not riposte Ukrainian does not hold. sent2: the joist is not difficult. sent3: if the tachymeter is not a catalyst it is difficult and it is not a luminosity. sent4: the tachymeter does not riposte Ukrainian if it is bionic and it is a kind of a catalyst. sent5: if the pinesap is not exodontics the hoya is both untheatrical and not a plover. sent6: the pinesap is not exodontics if that the stole is a kind of a group that does not riposte Ukrainian is not correct. sent7: the fact that the tachymeter is both difficult and not a luminosity is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tachymeter is not a catalyst.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the tachymeter is difficult and is not a luminosity.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the tachymeter is a catalyst hold.; __UNKNOWN__