the putamen is not a kind of a newt but it is a locoism.
sent1: if the buna is not proprietary the trophotropism defrays Wednesday and is a provincial. sent2: if the leaven is not a kind of a skinful then that it is a Swietinia and not a radical is false. sent3: something is aerological and salves wold if the fact that it is not a giraffe is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that something is not a newt but it is a locoism is incorrect if it is not a vermin. sent5: the balloon is not metrological if there exists something such that that it is a Swietinia but not a radical is not right. sent6: there is something such that it is a provincial. sent7: the trophotropism is a vermin. sent8: that the leaven is not a telecaster is right. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that it is a vermin hold. sent10: something is not a intellectualization if it is a cobber and it is not a kind of a telecaster. sent11: the insectivore is a kind of Socratic thing that does invoke. sent12: the fact that the trophotropism is provincial hold. sent13: the putamen is not a kind of a provincial but it reveals immunodeficiency. sent14: the putamen does defray Wednesday if it is not proprietary. sent15: the leaven is electrical and not a skinful if it is not a kind of a intellectualization. sent16: if something is not metrological that it is a belemnite and it is a simmer is not correct. sent17: the putamen is nonproprietary. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a vermin and it is provincial the fact that the putamen is not a kind of a newt is not wrong. sent19: if the shiksa is not Mishnaic then it is a locoism that is a Nacimiento. sent20: the leaven is a kind of a cobber.
sent7 & sent12 -> int1: the trophotropism is a vermin and is not non-provincial.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a vermin and it is a provincial is not wrong.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the putamen is not a newt.;
the clews is aerological and does salve wold if it is not a giraffe.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the putamen is not a kind of a newt but it is a locoism. ; $context$ = sent1: if the buna is not proprietary the trophotropism defrays Wednesday and is a provincial. sent2: if the leaven is not a kind of a skinful then that it is a Swietinia and not a radical is false. sent3: something is aerological and salves wold if the fact that it is not a giraffe is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that something is not a newt but it is a locoism is incorrect if it is not a vermin. sent5: the balloon is not metrological if there exists something such that that it is a Swietinia but not a radical is not right. sent6: there is something such that it is a provincial. sent7: the trophotropism is a vermin. sent8: that the leaven is not a telecaster is right. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that it is a vermin hold. sent10: something is not a intellectualization if it is a cobber and it is not a kind of a telecaster. sent11: the insectivore is a kind of Socratic thing that does invoke. sent12: the fact that the trophotropism is provincial hold. sent13: the putamen is not a kind of a provincial but it reveals immunodeficiency. sent14: the putamen does defray Wednesday if it is not proprietary. sent15: the leaven is electrical and not a skinful if it is not a kind of a intellectualization. sent16: if something is not metrological that it is a belemnite and it is a simmer is not correct. sent17: the putamen is nonproprietary. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a vermin and it is provincial the fact that the putamen is not a kind of a newt is not wrong. sent19: if the shiksa is not Mishnaic then it is a locoism that is a Nacimiento. sent20: the leaven is a kind of a cobber. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent12 -> int1: the trophotropism is a vermin and is not non-provincial.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a vermin and it is a provincial is not wrong.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the putamen is not a newt.; __UNKNOWN__