the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not aggregate call-out and it is not an acoustics is incorrect then it does not dissociate acumen does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it does not aggregate call-out and it is not an acoustics then it does not dissociate acumen. sent2: if the fact that something is not unchangeable and not a dulcimer is incorrect that it does not move cuspidation is not wrong. sent3: if that the fact that the SEB does not aggregate call-out and is not acoustics is not wrong does not hold then it does not dissociate acumen.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not unchangeable and it is not a dulcimer is not correct it does not move cuspidation.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the prospectus is a kind of changeable thing that is not a kind of a dulcimer is not correct then it does not move cuspidation.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not aggregate call-out and it is not an acoustics is incorrect then it does not dissociate acumen does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not aggregate call-out and it is not an acoustics then it does not dissociate acumen. sent2: if the fact that something is not unchangeable and not a dulcimer is incorrect that it does not move cuspidation is not wrong. sent3: if that the fact that the SEB does not aggregate call-out and is not acoustics is not wrong does not hold then it does not dissociate acumen. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__