the ghee is not a seek.
sent1: if the fact that the felo-de-se is a coastguard but it does not rehabilitate clampdown does not hold the beefwood is a kind of a giver. sent2: the tinkerer is a agreeableness. sent3: something does seek if it is not bursal. sent4: the tinkerer is not a kind of a radical if that the guidebook does rehabilitate clampdown and it is a kind of a manual is not true. sent5: something does spend uprightness if that it chastens cooper is not incorrect. sent6: the beefwood is a giver if the felo-de-se is not a coastguard. sent7: if the felo-de-se does not rehabilitate clampdown the fact that the guidebook rehabilitate clampdown and is a manual is wrong. sent8: that the tinkerer is a radical is not false if that the guidebook is a agreeableness and not manual does not hold. sent9: something that is a agreeableness is a radical. sent10: if the beefwood is a kind of a giver then the ghee is not bursal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the felo-de-se is a coastguard but it does not rehabilitate clampdown.; assump1 -> int1: that the felo-de-se does not rehabilitate clampdown hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the guidebook rehabilitates clampdown and it is a kind of a manual is not true.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the tinkerer is not radical.; sent9 -> int4: the tinkerer is a kind of a radical if it is a agreeableness.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the tinkerer is a radical.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the felo-de-se is a kind of a coastguard but it does not rehabilitate clampdown is false.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the beefwood is a giver.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the ghee is not bursal.; sent3 -> int10: the ghee seeks if it is not bursal.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
if the bluefin does chasten cooper then it does spend uprightness.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the ghee is not a seek. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the felo-de-se is a coastguard but it does not rehabilitate clampdown does not hold the beefwood is a kind of a giver. sent2: the tinkerer is a agreeableness. sent3: something does seek if it is not bursal. sent4: the tinkerer is not a kind of a radical if that the guidebook does rehabilitate clampdown and it is a kind of a manual is not true. sent5: something does spend uprightness if that it chastens cooper is not incorrect. sent6: the beefwood is a giver if the felo-de-se is not a coastguard. sent7: if the felo-de-se does not rehabilitate clampdown the fact that the guidebook rehabilitate clampdown and is a manual is wrong. sent8: that the tinkerer is a radical is not false if that the guidebook is a agreeableness and not manual does not hold. sent9: something that is a agreeableness is a radical. sent10: if the beefwood is a kind of a giver then the ghee is not bursal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the felo-de-se is a coastguard but it does not rehabilitate clampdown.; assump1 -> int1: that the felo-de-se does not rehabilitate clampdown hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the guidebook rehabilitates clampdown and it is a kind of a manual is not true.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the tinkerer is not radical.; sent9 -> int4: the tinkerer is a kind of a radical if it is a agreeableness.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the tinkerer is a radical.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the felo-de-se is a kind of a coastguard but it does not rehabilitate clampdown is false.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the beefwood is a giver.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the ghee is not bursal.; sent3 -> int10: the ghee seeks if it is not bursal.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__