the slipstream is controversial.
sent1: the slipstream is not controversial if something is not efficient and it does not stone stiffener. sent2: if something does not ammoniate Amianthum it is efficient. sent3: the wheatworm does clank mailing. sent4: something is controversial if it is a chilblain. sent5: everything does nutate and is not antipyretic. sent6: that the osteoclast stones stiffener is not false if the wheatworm is efficient. sent7: the fact that the wheatworm ammoniates Amianthum and is not unplayful is wrong if it clanks mailing. sent8: the fact that something clanks mailing and is not corrigible is not correct if it nutates. sent9: The mailing does clank wheatworm. sent10: the slipstream is a chilblain if the osteoclast stones stiffener.
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that that the wheatworm does ammoniate Amianthum and is not unplayful is not true is not false.; sent4 -> int2: if the slipstream is a chilblain then it is controversial.;
the slipstream is not controversial.
sent5 -> int3: the lining does nutate and is not antipyretic.; int3 -> int4: the lining does nutate.; int4 -> int5: everything does nutate.; int5 -> int6: the gastrulation nutates.; sent8 -> int7: if the fact that the gastrulation does nutate is correct that it clanks mailing and is not corrigible is not true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the gastrulation does clank mailing and is not corrigible is incorrect.; int8 -> int9: there is nothing that clanks mailing and is not corrigible.; int9 -> int10: that the revetment clanks mailing but it is not corrigible is not true.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it does clank mailing and it is incorrigible is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the slipstream is controversial. ; $context$ = sent1: the slipstream is not controversial if something is not efficient and it does not stone stiffener. sent2: if something does not ammoniate Amianthum it is efficient. sent3: the wheatworm does clank mailing. sent4: something is controversial if it is a chilblain. sent5: everything does nutate and is not antipyretic. sent6: that the osteoclast stones stiffener is not false if the wheatworm is efficient. sent7: the fact that the wheatworm ammoniates Amianthum and is not unplayful is wrong if it clanks mailing. sent8: the fact that something clanks mailing and is not corrigible is not correct if it nutates. sent9: The mailing does clank wheatworm. sent10: the slipstream is a chilblain if the osteoclast stones stiffener. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that that the wheatworm does ammoniate Amianthum and is not unplayful is not true is not false.; sent4 -> int2: if the slipstream is a chilblain then it is controversial.; __UNKNOWN__