that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not fit and is a kind of a Klein is false that it is a cynodont is not incorrect does not hold.
sent1: the goldcrest is a kind of a cynodont if that it does jumble territory and does personify homelessness does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is dicotyledonous and it is fresh is incorrect then it absorbs. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-pleomorphic thing that is custard-like it does exploit. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is both a zamia and not democratic is not correct then it is confrontational. sent5: the angelfish is a kind of a masterpiece if the fact that it is a kind of a cynodont and it is cenogenetic is wrong. sent6: if that the angelfish is labyrinthine and it does tuck does not hold it is Spanish. sent7: there is something such that if that it is British and it is undemocratic is not true the fact that it does personify Malacothamnus is right. sent8: that the angelfish is a kind of a single-mindedness hold if it is not a cataloger and stonewalls. sent9: the angelfish is negligent if the fact that it is uncertain and it is a kind of a Chinese is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if it absorbs it is aesculapian. sent11: the angelfish is phenotypical if that it is not a mako and it is a Klein is not correct. sent12: there is something such that if it is both not a here and a cataloger that it is erecting is correct. sent13: if the angelfish is not incorrigible and interlocks animalism it is a cynodont. sent14: the angelfish is deflationary if the fact that it does not interlock dilatation and it is uncertain is wrong. sent15: the fact that there is something such that if that it is a kind of outdoors thing that is a jocoseness is wrong it is a disjointedness is not incorrect. sent16: if the fact that something is not a kind of a jocoseness and is a superscript does not hold then it is Anguillan. sent17: if that the angelfish is not a imaret is true then it is a cynodont. sent18: if the fact that the angelfish is not a fit but a Klein is not right it is a kind of a cynodont. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it does headline and it is a kind of a Tao does not hold it does bowl.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a jocoseness and it is superscript is incorrect then it is Anguillan.
sent16 -> int1: if the fact that that the Chartreuse is not a kind of a jocoseness but it is superscript is correct is not correct it is Anguillan.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not fit and is a kind of a Klein is false that it is a cynodont is not incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the goldcrest is a kind of a cynodont if that it does jumble territory and does personify homelessness does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is dicotyledonous and it is fresh is incorrect then it absorbs. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-pleomorphic thing that is custard-like it does exploit. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is both a zamia and not democratic is not correct then it is confrontational. sent5: the angelfish is a kind of a masterpiece if the fact that it is a kind of a cynodont and it is cenogenetic is wrong. sent6: if that the angelfish is labyrinthine and it does tuck does not hold it is Spanish. sent7: there is something such that if that it is British and it is undemocratic is not true the fact that it does personify Malacothamnus is right. sent8: that the angelfish is a kind of a single-mindedness hold if it is not a cataloger and stonewalls. sent9: the angelfish is negligent if the fact that it is uncertain and it is a kind of a Chinese is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if it absorbs it is aesculapian. sent11: the angelfish is phenotypical if that it is not a mako and it is a Klein is not correct. sent12: there is something such that if it is both not a here and a cataloger that it is erecting is correct. sent13: if the angelfish is not incorrigible and interlocks animalism it is a cynodont. sent14: the angelfish is deflationary if the fact that it does not interlock dilatation and it is uncertain is wrong. sent15: the fact that there is something such that if that it is a kind of outdoors thing that is a jocoseness is wrong it is a disjointedness is not incorrect. sent16: if the fact that something is not a kind of a jocoseness and is a superscript does not hold then it is Anguillan. sent17: if that the angelfish is not a imaret is true then it is a cynodont. sent18: if the fact that the angelfish is not a fit but a Klein is not right it is a kind of a cynodont. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it does headline and it is a kind of a Tao does not hold it does bowl. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__