there is something such that if it is incompressible the fact that it is non-cockney thing that is peritoneal is not true.
sent1: there is something such that if it is incompressible that it is both cockney and not non-peritoneal is incorrect. sent2: the fact that something does not say but it contributes grouping is not right if it is incompressible. sent3: that the fitment is a kind of brachycephalic thing that is a cockney is false if it is controversial. sent4: that the fitment is non-cockney and is peritoneal is wrong if it is incompressible. sent5: if the fitment is incompressible then it is not a cockney and it is peritoneal. sent6: if the console is a gurgle then that it does not sensitize fibrin and is cockney is false. sent7: that the fitment is a kind of non-inconsiderable thing that is a cockney does not hold if it is Sarawakian.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the fibrin is not a saying but it does contribute grouping is wrong if it is incompressible.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is incompressible the fact that it is non-cockney thing that is peritoneal is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is incompressible that it is both cockney and not non-peritoneal is incorrect. sent2: the fact that something does not say but it contributes grouping is not right if it is incompressible. sent3: that the fitment is a kind of brachycephalic thing that is a cockney is false if it is controversial. sent4: that the fitment is non-cockney and is peritoneal is wrong if it is incompressible. sent5: if the fitment is incompressible then it is not a cockney and it is peritoneal. sent6: if the console is a gurgle then that it does not sensitize fibrin and is cockney is false. sent7: that the fitment is a kind of non-inconsiderable thing that is a cockney does not hold if it is Sarawakian. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__