if the drinking is a hint that it is non-unprophetic thing that is not a nonobservance does not hold.
sent1: if the drinking is a kind of a hint then it is prophetic thing that is not a kind of a nonobservance. sent2: the drinking does not hint if it is not unprophetic and is not a nonobservance. sent3: if something is acinar that it does not repot separation and it is not an itch is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the drinking is prophetic thing that is not a nonobservance is true.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the drinking is not a hint.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the drinking is a kind of a hint.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the drinking is prophetic thing that is not a nonobservance is not true.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the drinking does not repot separation and is not a kind of an itch is not right.
sent3 -> int4: that the drinking does not repot separation and it is not an itch is wrong if it is acinar.;
$hypothesis$ = if the drinking is a hint that it is non-unprophetic thing that is not a nonobservance does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the drinking is a kind of a hint then it is prophetic thing that is not a kind of a nonobservance. sent2: the drinking does not hint if it is not unprophetic and is not a nonobservance. sent3: if something is acinar that it does not repot separation and it is not an itch is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the drinking is prophetic thing that is not a nonobservance is true.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the drinking is not a hint.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the drinking is a kind of a hint.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the drinking is prophetic thing that is not a nonobservance is not true.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__