the fact that there exists something such that if it is a cirrus that it does not levitate and/or is not a stob is incorrect is not true.
sent1: there is something such that if that it does power is true then it is a TCP. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a cirrus it does not levitate and/or it is not a stob. sent3: that the pleaser is a kind of a stob and/or is not a prizefighter is incorrect if it paints. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a cirrus then that it either levitates or is not a stob or both is incorrect. sent5: that the pleaser does not levitate or is not a stob or both does not hold if it is a cirrus. sent6: if the ten-spot does front alliance it is not unawares and/or it does not levitate. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sorrow the fact that it is not a harmonization and/or it nestles is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it sleepwalks that it is not Danish or it does not repine Monroe or both is not correct. sent9: that the pleaser does not jeer or it is not a stob or both is wrong if it is a kind of a revoke. sent10: the fact that something is not a scrupulousness and/or is not a kind of a allergology is incorrect if that it does galvanize is not wrong. sent11: if the pleaser is a cirrus that it does levitate and/or is not a stob is not right.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does galvanize that it is not a scrupulousness or is not a allergology or both is not correct.
sent10 -> int1: if the Mason galvanizes then the fact that it is not a kind of a scrupulousness and/or is not a kind of a allergology is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a cirrus that it does not levitate and/or is not a stob is incorrect is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it does power is true then it is a TCP. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a cirrus it does not levitate and/or it is not a stob. sent3: that the pleaser is a kind of a stob and/or is not a prizefighter is incorrect if it paints. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a cirrus then that it either levitates or is not a stob or both is incorrect. sent5: that the pleaser does not levitate or is not a stob or both does not hold if it is a cirrus. sent6: if the ten-spot does front alliance it is not unawares and/or it does not levitate. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sorrow the fact that it is not a harmonization and/or it nestles is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it sleepwalks that it is not Danish or it does not repine Monroe or both is not correct. sent9: that the pleaser does not jeer or it is not a stob or both is wrong if it is a kind of a revoke. sent10: the fact that something is not a scrupulousness and/or is not a kind of a allergology is incorrect if that it does galvanize is not wrong. sent11: if the pleaser is a cirrus that it does levitate and/or is not a stob is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__