the treating brochette does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the camping does not occur and/or the matutinalness occurs is incorrect. sent2: the experiment occurs and/or the anophelineness occurs. sent3: the fact that the camping occurs hold. sent4: the staccatoness does not occur if that the Hanoverianness occurs and the notification happens is not correct. sent5: the treating brochette is triggered by that the experiment does not occur and/or the anopheline. sent6: if the fact that the camping does not occur and/or the matutinalness happens does not hold then the treating firm does not occur. sent7: the sublunarness does not occur. sent8: if the sublunarness does not occur then that the Hanoverianness happens and the notification happens does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the treating firm does not occur hold then the fact that the non-staccatoness and the non-anophelineness happens is false.
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: that both the Hanoverian and the notification occurs is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the staccatoness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anopheline does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the non-staccatoness and the non-anophelineness occurs.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the treating firm does not occur.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the fact that both the non-staccatoness and the non-anophelineness happens is not right.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the anopheline happens.; int7 -> int8: the experimenting does not occur and/or the anopheline occurs.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the treating brochette does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the camping does not occur and/or the matutinalness occurs is incorrect. sent2: the experiment occurs and/or the anophelineness occurs. sent3: the fact that the camping occurs hold. sent4: the staccatoness does not occur if that the Hanoverianness occurs and the notification happens is not correct. sent5: the treating brochette is triggered by that the experiment does not occur and/or the anopheline. sent6: if the fact that the camping does not occur and/or the matutinalness happens does not hold then the treating firm does not occur. sent7: the sublunarness does not occur. sent8: if the sublunarness does not occur then that the Hanoverianness happens and the notification happens does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the treating firm does not occur hold then the fact that the non-staccatoness and the non-anophelineness happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: that both the Hanoverian and the notification occurs is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the staccatoness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anopheline does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the non-staccatoness and the non-anophelineness occurs.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the treating firm does not occur.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the fact that both the non-staccatoness and the non-anophelineness happens is not right.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the anopheline happens.; int7 -> int8: the experimenting does not occur and/or the anopheline occurs.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__