the fact that the Lady is hermeneutics but it does not lysogenize bonnet is incorrect if the fact that the Call is a kind of a fundamentalism hold.
sent1: something is a fundamentalism if it is not a greens. sent2: that the ferment lysogenizes bonnet is true. sent3: the fact that the Lady is hermeneutics but it does not lysogenize bonnet is incorrect if the Call is not hermeneutics. sent4: if the ferment is hermeneutics then the Lady is anoxic. sent5: that if the ferment is alchemistic then the Call does green is not wrong. sent6: if the ferment is anoxic the Call is alchemistic. sent7: if the Call is alchemistic and it is a fundamentalism then it is not hermeneutics. sent8: the Call is alchemistic if the ferment is a greens.
the burro is a fundamentalism.
sent1 -> int1: if the burro is not greens that it is a fundamentalism hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Lady is hermeneutics but it does not lysogenize bonnet is incorrect if the fact that the Call is a kind of a fundamentalism hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a fundamentalism if it is not a greens. sent2: that the ferment lysogenizes bonnet is true. sent3: the fact that the Lady is hermeneutics but it does not lysogenize bonnet is incorrect if the Call is not hermeneutics. sent4: if the ferment is hermeneutics then the Lady is anoxic. sent5: that if the ferment is alchemistic then the Call does green is not wrong. sent6: if the ferment is anoxic the Call is alchemistic. sent7: if the Call is alchemistic and it is a fundamentalism then it is not hermeneutics. sent8: the Call is alchemistic if the ferment is a greens. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__