the fact that either something rendezvous salting or it is a crackle or both does not hold.
sent1: if the matelote is a kind of a Powhatan that it is not attachable and is social is not right. sent2: the matelote is both not attachable and social if that the iridium is not a kind of a crackle hold. sent3: the matelote is a Powhatan.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the iridium is not a crackle.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the matelote is non-attachable but it is social.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: that the matelote is not attachable and is social does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the iridium crackles.; int4 -> int5: the iridium rendezvous salting or does crackle or both.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either something rendezvous salting or it is a crackle or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the matelote is a kind of a Powhatan that it is not attachable and is social is not right. sent2: the matelote is both not attachable and social if that the iridium is not a kind of a crackle hold. sent3: the matelote is a Powhatan. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the iridium is not a crackle.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the matelote is non-attachable but it is social.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: that the matelote is not attachable and is social does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the iridium crackles.; int4 -> int5: the iridium rendezvous salting or does crackle or both.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__