the fact that there exists something such that if it is not bicapsular it is a sop and it does not study VLDL is not correct.
sent1: if something is not papillary it is not non-smooth but alterable. sent2: the keep is a Hirundo and not a commandant if that it is not bicapsular is not incorrect. sent3: if that the crossing is not bicapsular is right that it sops and it does not study VLDL hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not bicapsular it sops. sent5: if the crossing is not bicapsular then it is a sop that does study VLDL.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the chase smooths but it is not unalterable if it is not papillary.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not bicapsular it is a sop and it does not study VLDL is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not papillary it is not non-smooth but alterable. sent2: the keep is a Hirundo and not a commandant if that it is not bicapsular is not incorrect. sent3: if that the crossing is not bicapsular is right that it sops and it does not study VLDL hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not bicapsular it sops. sent5: if the crossing is not bicapsular then it is a sop that does study VLDL. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__