that if that the employer is both not a minestrone and the Togolese is not correct then the employer does not list backstitch is not correct.
sent1: the tomatillo is a kind of a minestrone. sent2: if that the employer is not associative but it is a moorwort is not correct it is not a moorwort. sent3: that the fact that the employer is not Ceylonese and dumps boarder is correct is false. sent4: the backstitch is not bregmatic but it is Ceylonese. sent5: the employer is not a kind of a minestrone but it is not non-Togolese if that it lists backstitch hold. sent6: the warrigal is Togolese. sent7: the fact that the employer dumps ethyl hold. sent8: if that that the employer does not refresh serratus but it does welcome is not true is right then it is a holophyte. sent9: that the employer is a minestrone that is a Togolese is wrong. sent10: the employer is not sexagesimal but it does refresh counterattraction. sent11: if something is not a moorwort that it is a kind of a Peirce and is epicyclic does not hold. sent12: the fact that that the employer is not a kind of a merchandise but it is an encounter hold does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the employer is not a allomerism but it lists backstitch does not hold then that it is a kind of a cayuse hold. sent14: the fact that the employer is a kind of nonassociative thing that is a kind of a moorwort is false. sent15: if the backstitch is disciplinary it is not a kind of a mirage.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the employer does list backstitch is right.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the employer is not a minestrone but it is a Togolese.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the employer is both not a minestrone and Togolese is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the employer does not list backstitch is right.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the pollen is not measurable but it is a minestrone.
sent11 -> int4: if the employer is not a moorwort then the fact that it is a Peirce and it is epicyclic is false.; sent2 & sent14 -> int5: the employer is not a moorwort.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the employer is a Peirce and is epicyclic is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Peirce and it is epicyclic is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that if that the employer is both not a minestrone and the Togolese is not correct then the employer does not list backstitch is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the tomatillo is a kind of a minestrone. sent2: if that the employer is not associative but it is a moorwort is not correct it is not a moorwort. sent3: that the fact that the employer is not Ceylonese and dumps boarder is correct is false. sent4: the backstitch is not bregmatic but it is Ceylonese. sent5: the employer is not a kind of a minestrone but it is not non-Togolese if that it lists backstitch hold. sent6: the warrigal is Togolese. sent7: the fact that the employer dumps ethyl hold. sent8: if that that the employer does not refresh serratus but it does welcome is not true is right then it is a holophyte. sent9: that the employer is a minestrone that is a Togolese is wrong. sent10: the employer is not sexagesimal but it does refresh counterattraction. sent11: if something is not a moorwort that it is a kind of a Peirce and is epicyclic does not hold. sent12: the fact that that the employer is not a kind of a merchandise but it is an encounter hold does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the employer is not a allomerism but it lists backstitch does not hold then that it is a kind of a cayuse hold. sent14: the fact that the employer is a kind of nonassociative thing that is a kind of a moorwort is false. sent15: if the backstitch is disciplinary it is not a kind of a mirage. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the employer does list backstitch is right.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the employer is not a minestrone but it is a Togolese.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the employer is both not a minestrone and Togolese is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the employer does not list backstitch is right.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__