the Shaktist is baboonish and it is a bovid.
sent1: if that the chaja is not a drone is incorrect it is both not a determent and an awe. sent2: the Shaktist awes if the fact that the chaja is baboonish hold. sent3: the mallow is a drone. sent4: that the castle is not a bovid and not a West-sider does not hold. sent5: the chaja is a bovid or is an awe or both. sent6: if the mallow is a calculator the Shaktist is baboonish. sent7: something is a corkage or a calculator or both if it is not a determent. sent8: if either something is a bovid or it does drone or both the castle is a calculator. sent9: the Shaktist is a bovid. sent10: the chaja is a bovid if there exists something such that it is baboonish and/or it is a determent. sent11: if the chaja is a drone the castle is a determent. sent12: the mallow does drone if the fact that something is a bovid or it is a calculator or both is not wrong. sent13: that the chaja is an awe hold. sent14: the mallow is a calculator if the castle is a kind of a drone. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a bovid and not a West-sider is wrong then the chaja is not baboonish. sent16: there exists something such that it is baboonish and/or drones. sent17: the Shaktist greets empiricism. sent18: the mallow is a phalarope. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a determent then that the castle does drone hold. sent20: the chaja does greet romanticism and it is a plain.
sent13 -> int1: the chaja is a determent or an awe or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a determent and/or an awe.;
the fact that the Shaktist is not non-baboonish but a bovid is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the Shaktist is baboonish and it is a bovid. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the chaja is not a drone is incorrect it is both not a determent and an awe. sent2: the Shaktist awes if the fact that the chaja is baboonish hold. sent3: the mallow is a drone. sent4: that the castle is not a bovid and not a West-sider does not hold. sent5: the chaja is a bovid or is an awe or both. sent6: if the mallow is a calculator the Shaktist is baboonish. sent7: something is a corkage or a calculator or both if it is not a determent. sent8: if either something is a bovid or it does drone or both the castle is a calculator. sent9: the Shaktist is a bovid. sent10: the chaja is a bovid if there exists something such that it is baboonish and/or it is a determent. sent11: if the chaja is a drone the castle is a determent. sent12: the mallow does drone if the fact that something is a bovid or it is a calculator or both is not wrong. sent13: that the chaja is an awe hold. sent14: the mallow is a calculator if the castle is a kind of a drone. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a bovid and not a West-sider is wrong then the chaja is not baboonish. sent16: there exists something such that it is baboonish and/or drones. sent17: the Shaktist greets empiricism. sent18: the mallow is a phalarope. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a determent then that the castle does drone hold. sent20: the chaja does greet romanticism and it is a plain. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the chaja is a determent or an awe or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a determent and/or an awe.; __UNKNOWN__