there exists something such that that it does not stud haying and it does stud Granada does not hold.
sent1: that the enclosure is a kind of non-calyculate thing that is sentient is not true. sent2: if the pincer is a Mongol the zygospore does not stud haying. sent3: the fact that the pincer studs haying and studs Granada is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the zygospore is non-Romany thing that pricks is incorrect it is not a gecko. sent5: the fact that the zygospore is not a satirist but wide is wrong if the pincer is not a prick. sent6: that the pincer is wide and it is a satirist is not correct. sent7: if the fisherman is not a gecko then that the pincer is both wide and a satirist is not right. sent8: if something is not Romany that it does not stud haying and studs Granada is false. sent9: the fact that something studs haying and studs Granada is not correct if it is not a Romany. sent10: if the pincer is wide it is not a Romany. sent11: something is not a Romany if that it is not wide and it is a satirist is not correct. sent12: the fisherman is not a gecko if the fact that the zygospore is a kind of a Mongol hold. sent13: the zygospore is a kind of a Mongol that is a prick. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it does stud haying and studs Granada is not right. sent15: the pincer is not a kind of a prick if the zygospore is a satirist. sent16: the zygospore is a kind of a prick.
sent13 -> int1: the zygospore is a kind of a Mongol.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fisherman is not a kind of a gecko.; sent11 -> int3: if that the pincer is non-wide but it is a kind of a satirist is wrong then that it is not Romany is correct.; sent8 -> int4: that the pincer does not stud haying and does stud Granada is not right if it is not a Romany.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does not stud haying and it does stud Granada does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the enclosure is a kind of non-calyculate thing that is sentient is not true. sent2: if the pincer is a Mongol the zygospore does not stud haying. sent3: the fact that the pincer studs haying and studs Granada is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the zygospore is non-Romany thing that pricks is incorrect it is not a gecko. sent5: the fact that the zygospore is not a satirist but wide is wrong if the pincer is not a prick. sent6: that the pincer is wide and it is a satirist is not correct. sent7: if the fisherman is not a gecko then that the pincer is both wide and a satirist is not right. sent8: if something is not Romany that it does not stud haying and studs Granada is false. sent9: the fact that something studs haying and studs Granada is not correct if it is not a Romany. sent10: if the pincer is wide it is not a Romany. sent11: something is not a Romany if that it is not wide and it is a satirist is not correct. sent12: the fisherman is not a gecko if the fact that the zygospore is a kind of a Mongol hold. sent13: the zygospore is a kind of a Mongol that is a prick. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it does stud haying and studs Granada is not right. sent15: the pincer is not a kind of a prick if the zygospore is a satirist. sent16: the zygospore is a kind of a prick. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the zygospore is a kind of a Mongol.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fisherman is not a kind of a gecko.; sent11 -> int3: if that the pincer is non-wide but it is a kind of a satirist is wrong then that it is not Romany is correct.; sent8 -> int4: that the pincer does not stud haying and does stud Granada is not right if it is not a Romany.; __UNKNOWN__