the flocking Fuego does not occur.
sent1: both the non-riblessness and the non-untraceableness occurs if the imperialisticness occurs. sent2: that the blueing Opposition occurs yields that the flocking Fuego does not occur. sent3: the flocking Fuego does not occur if that the doricness but not the blueing Opposition happens is not correct. sent4: if the fog happens the fact that the doricness happens and the blueing Opposition does not occur is not correct. sent5: both the flocking Fuego and the fog happens if the fact that the riblessness happens is not right.
the flocking Fuego happens.
$hypothesis$ = the flocking Fuego does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the non-riblessness and the non-untraceableness occurs if the imperialisticness occurs. sent2: that the blueing Opposition occurs yields that the flocking Fuego does not occur. sent3: the flocking Fuego does not occur if that the doricness but not the blueing Opposition happens is not correct. sent4: if the fog happens the fact that the doricness happens and the blueing Opposition does not occur is not correct. sent5: both the flocking Fuego and the fog happens if the fact that the riblessness happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__