that the chlorophyll does not scald teiid but it does harmonize is not correct.
sent1: everything either is not a kind of an advection or does not harmonize or both. sent2: the fact that if something is not a Garbo and/or it is not a psaltery then it is not a psaltery is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the gingerol is an ebb and it is a kind of a Kirchner does not hold if something is a kind of a rocketry. sent4: if the gingerol is not worthless that it is not a test and it is not an advection does not hold. sent5: the sassaby is worthless if there is something such that it is a kind of a Kirchner. sent6: if the fact that something is an ebb and a Kirchner is not right that it is not a Kirchner is right. sent7: something is not a Garbo. sent8: the Ab is not a Garbo. sent9: if the gingerol is not a Kirchner then the mailbag is worthless and is a kind of a amorphophallus. sent10: if the mailbag is not a torture the gingerol is not a test and it is not an advection. sent11: something that does torture is a Garbo. sent12: if the sassaby either is a amorphophallus or is worthless or both the gingerol is not worthless. sent13: the sassaby is not a kind of a torture. sent14: the fact that the loggerhead scalds teiid does not hold if the fact that the Ab does not test but it is a torture is false. sent15: something is not a kind of a Garbo and/or it is not a psaltery if it does not scald teiid. sent16: there is something such that it is a Kirchner. sent17: if that the Ab does not scald teiid is correct then the fact that the chlorophyll does not scald teiid but it harmonizes does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that it is a rocketry. sent19: if something is not an advection that it does not test and it does torture is false. sent20: that the gingerol is a Kirchner and is not a amorphophallus does not hold. sent21: the fact that something does not test but it is an advection is not right if it is worthless. sent22: if the Ab is a Garbo then the chlorophyll does not scald teiid but it does harmonize. sent23: if the fact that the gingerol is a Kirchner and is not a amorphophallus is not correct the loggerhead is not a Kirchner. sent24: the mailbag is not a torture if there is something such that it does scald teiid and is not a Garbo.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ab scalds teiid.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the Ab does scald teiid but it is not a Garbo.; int1 -> int2: something does scald teiid and is not a kind of a Garbo.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the mailbag is not a torture.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the gingerol is not a test and it is not a kind of an advection.; sent16 & sent5 -> int5: the sassaby is worthless.; int5 -> int6: either the sassaby is a amorphophallus or it is worthless or both.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the gingerol is not worthless.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: that the fact that the gingerol is not a test and not an advection does not hold is true.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the Ab does not scald teiid.; int10 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the chlorophyll does not scald teiid but it does harmonize.
sent11 -> int11: the Ab is a kind of a Garbo if it is a torture.; sent21 -> int12: that the mailbag does not test but it is an advection is not correct if it is worthless.; sent6 -> int13: if the fact that the gingerol does ebb and it is a Kirchner is not correct then it is not a kind of a Kirchner.; sent18 & sent3 -> int14: the fact that the gingerol is both an ebb and a Kirchner is not correct.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the gingerol is not a Kirchner.; sent9 & int15 -> int16: the mailbag is worthless and is a amorphophallus.; int16 -> int17: the mailbag is not valuable.; int12 & int17 -> int18: that the mailbag does not test but it is a kind of an advection does not hold.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that the fact that it is not a test and is an advection does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the chlorophyll does not scald teiid but it does harmonize is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: everything either is not a kind of an advection or does not harmonize or both. sent2: the fact that if something is not a Garbo and/or it is not a psaltery then it is not a psaltery is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the gingerol is an ebb and it is a kind of a Kirchner does not hold if something is a kind of a rocketry. sent4: if the gingerol is not worthless that it is not a test and it is not an advection does not hold. sent5: the sassaby is worthless if there is something such that it is a kind of a Kirchner. sent6: if the fact that something is an ebb and a Kirchner is not right that it is not a Kirchner is right. sent7: something is not a Garbo. sent8: the Ab is not a Garbo. sent9: if the gingerol is not a Kirchner then the mailbag is worthless and is a kind of a amorphophallus. sent10: if the mailbag is not a torture the gingerol is not a test and it is not an advection. sent11: something that does torture is a Garbo. sent12: if the sassaby either is a amorphophallus or is worthless or both the gingerol is not worthless. sent13: the sassaby is not a kind of a torture. sent14: the fact that the loggerhead scalds teiid does not hold if the fact that the Ab does not test but it is a torture is false. sent15: something is not a kind of a Garbo and/or it is not a psaltery if it does not scald teiid. sent16: there is something such that it is a Kirchner. sent17: if that the Ab does not scald teiid is correct then the fact that the chlorophyll does not scald teiid but it harmonizes does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that it is a rocketry. sent19: if something is not an advection that it does not test and it does torture is false. sent20: that the gingerol is a Kirchner and is not a amorphophallus does not hold. sent21: the fact that something does not test but it is an advection is not right if it is worthless. sent22: if the Ab is a Garbo then the chlorophyll does not scald teiid but it does harmonize. sent23: if the fact that the gingerol is a Kirchner and is not a amorphophallus is not correct the loggerhead is not a Kirchner. sent24: the mailbag is not a torture if there is something such that it does scald teiid and is not a Garbo. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ab scalds teiid.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the Ab does scald teiid but it is not a Garbo.; int1 -> int2: something does scald teiid and is not a kind of a Garbo.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the mailbag is not a torture.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the gingerol is not a test and it is not a kind of an advection.; sent16 & sent5 -> int5: the sassaby is worthless.; int5 -> int6: either the sassaby is a amorphophallus or it is worthless or both.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the gingerol is not worthless.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: that the fact that the gingerol is not a test and not an advection does not hold is true.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the Ab does not scald teiid.; int10 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__