that the kayak does not occur is right.
sent1: both the condoling hurry and the unretentiveness occurs. sent2: the consulship does not occur. sent3: the fact that the kvetch does not occur hold if the fact that that the non-offsideness and/or the non-backwardness occurs is not incorrect is wrong. sent4: that the benthicness but not the descant occurs results in that the prelims does not occur. sent5: if the anecdotalness does not occur then the fact that the kayaking and the prelims happens does not hold. sent6: if the Platonicness does not occur then the anecdotalness occurs and/or the prelims does not occur. sent7: the bending fallaciousness happens and the slurping occurs if the consulship does not occur. sent8: that the non-Platonicness and the anecdotalness happens is caused by that the prelims does not occur. sent9: the kvetch happens if that the benthicness occurs and the descant does not occur is not true. sent10: the kayak is brought about by that the offsideness occurs and the backwardness does not occur. sent11: if the slurping does not occur the condoling hurry happens and/or the condoling yoke does not occur. sent12: if the condoling yoke happens the fact that the unretentiveness happens and the condoling hurry does not occur does not hold. sent13: that the offsideness and the non-backwardness happens is brought about by the kvetch. sent14: that the slurping occurs leads to that the condoling yoke occurs. sent15: if the unretentiveness does not occur that the non-offsideness or the non-backwardness or both occurs is not correct. sent16: if the unretentiveness happens that the Platonicness does not occur but the anecdotalness happens is false. sent17: the benthicness happens. sent18: that the backwardness happens causes that the kvetch does not occur and the Platonicness does not occur. sent19: the kayaking does not occur if the fact that the kayaking occurs and the prelims occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the benthicness happens but the descanting does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the prelims does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the Platonicness does not occur but the anecdotalness occurs.; sent1 -> int3: the unretentiveness occurs.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that not the Platonicness but the anecdotalness happens is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the benthicness happens but the descanting does not occur is not true.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the kvetch happens.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the offside and the non-backwardness happens.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the kayaking does not occur is right.
$hypothesis$ = that the kayak does not occur is right. ; $context$ = sent1: both the condoling hurry and the unretentiveness occurs. sent2: the consulship does not occur. sent3: the fact that the kvetch does not occur hold if the fact that that the non-offsideness and/or the non-backwardness occurs is not incorrect is wrong. sent4: that the benthicness but not the descant occurs results in that the prelims does not occur. sent5: if the anecdotalness does not occur then the fact that the kayaking and the prelims happens does not hold. sent6: if the Platonicness does not occur then the anecdotalness occurs and/or the prelims does not occur. sent7: the bending fallaciousness happens and the slurping occurs if the consulship does not occur. sent8: that the non-Platonicness and the anecdotalness happens is caused by that the prelims does not occur. sent9: the kvetch happens if that the benthicness occurs and the descant does not occur is not true. sent10: the kayak is brought about by that the offsideness occurs and the backwardness does not occur. sent11: if the slurping does not occur the condoling hurry happens and/or the condoling yoke does not occur. sent12: if the condoling yoke happens the fact that the unretentiveness happens and the condoling hurry does not occur does not hold. sent13: that the offsideness and the non-backwardness happens is brought about by the kvetch. sent14: that the slurping occurs leads to that the condoling yoke occurs. sent15: if the unretentiveness does not occur that the non-offsideness or the non-backwardness or both occurs is not correct. sent16: if the unretentiveness happens that the Platonicness does not occur but the anecdotalness happens is false. sent17: the benthicness happens. sent18: that the backwardness happens causes that the kvetch does not occur and the Platonicness does not occur. sent19: the kayaking does not occur if the fact that the kayaking occurs and the prelims occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the benthicness happens but the descanting does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the prelims does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the Platonicness does not occur but the anecdotalness occurs.; sent1 -> int3: the unretentiveness occurs.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that not the Platonicness but the anecdotalness happens is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the benthicness happens but the descanting does not occur is not true.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the kvetch happens.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the offside and the non-backwardness happens.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__