the interoceptor symbolizes interoceptor and is not psychopharmacological.
sent1: the fact that the interoceptor symbolizes interoceptor but it is not psychopharmacological is false if the shepherdess does not symbolize meitnerium. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a OS and symbolizes Fulani is wrong then that the interoceptor does symbolize interoceptor is correct. sent3: if that that the shepherdess symbolizes meitnerium and does stress is not wrong does not hold then the joker is not a Millet. sent4: the joker is not a Millet if the shepherdess does not stress. sent5: there is something such that it symbolizes interoceptor. sent6: the joker is a Millet. sent7: something is fungicidal if it is psychopharmacological. sent8: the plastic is a stress but it is not a Neapolitan. sent9: something is not a kind of a OS but it does symbolize Fulani. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a OS and does symbolize Fulani is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the interoceptor is psychopharmacological.; assump1 -> int1: there are psychopharmacological things.; sent10 & sent2 -> int2: the interoceptor does symbolize interoceptor.;
the fact that that the interoceptor does symbolize interoceptor and is not psychopharmacological is true is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the interoceptor symbolizes interoceptor and is not psychopharmacological. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the interoceptor symbolizes interoceptor but it is not psychopharmacological is false if the shepherdess does not symbolize meitnerium. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a OS and symbolizes Fulani is wrong then that the interoceptor does symbolize interoceptor is correct. sent3: if that that the shepherdess symbolizes meitnerium and does stress is not wrong does not hold then the joker is not a Millet. sent4: the joker is not a Millet if the shepherdess does not stress. sent5: there is something such that it symbolizes interoceptor. sent6: the joker is a Millet. sent7: something is fungicidal if it is psychopharmacological. sent8: the plastic is a stress but it is not a Neapolitan. sent9: something is not a kind of a OS but it does symbolize Fulani. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a OS and does symbolize Fulani is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the interoceptor is psychopharmacological.; assump1 -> int1: there are psychopharmacological things.; sent10 & sent2 -> int2: the interoceptor does symbolize interoceptor.; __UNKNOWN__