the operableness causes the bisectionalness.
sent1: the fact that the overexposure does not occur and the crooning does not occur is not correct. sent2: either the counterintelligence occurs or the civilian does not occur or both. sent3: the emending prothorax does not occur. sent4: if the Neanderthalness does not occur the fact that the fact that the BAN occurs and the urticating Steuben happens does not hold is true. sent5: if the urticating Steuben does not occur that the fact that both the bisectionalness and the jarring equatability occurs is not correct is true. sent6: if the counterintelligence does not occur or the civilianness does not occur or both then the traumaticness does not occur. sent7: the jarring equatability does not occur. sent8: the stain does not occur if that the stain and the conditions happens is wrong. sent9: the curvet does not occur if that the allometricness and the curvet occurs is incorrect. sent10: if the jarring equatability does not occur the fact that the emending prothorax does not occur but the civilian occurs is incorrect. sent11: that the allometricness occurs and the curvet happens is not correct if the self-destruction does not occur. sent12: the Neanderthalness does not occur if that both the Neanderthalness and the pickings occurs is not correct. sent13: that the counterintelligence does not occur or the civilianness occurs or both hold. sent14: the overexposure happens if the fact that the overexposure does not occur and the crooning does not occur is false. sent15: if that both the emending prothorax and the non-civilianness occurs is false the emending rest does not occur. sent16: that the Neanderthalness and the pickings occurs is wrong if the curveting does not occur. sent17: if that the bisectionalness happens and the jarring equatability happens is not correct that the bisectionalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent18: if the counterintelligence does not occur then the fact that both the emending prothorax and the non-civilianness happens is wrong. sent19: the fact that the escape occurs is true if the overexposure occurs. sent20: that the stain does not occur causes that the curing but not the otherness happens. sent21: the emending overburden does not occur if both the curing and the non-otherness occurs. sent22: that both the non-traumaticness and the operableness happens triggers that the masonicness happens. sent23: if the operableness does not occur then the counterintelligence does not occur and the traumaticness does not occur. sent24: the urticating Steuben does not occur if that both the BAN and the urticating Steuben occurs does not hold. sent25: if the escape but not the emending overburden happens the self-destruction does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the civilian occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the emending prothorax does not occur but the civilianness happens is not false.; sent10 & sent7 -> int2: that the emending prothorax does not occur and the civilian occurs is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the civilian does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the counterintelligence does not occur or the civilian does not occur or both.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the traumaticness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the operableness occurs.; int6 & assump2 -> int7: both the non-traumaticness and the operableness happens.; int7 & sent22 -> int8: the masonicness happens.;
that the emending rest does not occur is true.
sent14 & sent1 -> int9: the overexposure occurs.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the escape occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the operableness causes the bisectionalness. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the overexposure does not occur and the crooning does not occur is not correct. sent2: either the counterintelligence occurs or the civilian does not occur or both. sent3: the emending prothorax does not occur. sent4: if the Neanderthalness does not occur the fact that the fact that the BAN occurs and the urticating Steuben happens does not hold is true. sent5: if the urticating Steuben does not occur that the fact that both the bisectionalness and the jarring equatability occurs is not correct is true. sent6: if the counterintelligence does not occur or the civilianness does not occur or both then the traumaticness does not occur. sent7: the jarring equatability does not occur. sent8: the stain does not occur if that the stain and the conditions happens is wrong. sent9: the curvet does not occur if that the allometricness and the curvet occurs is incorrect. sent10: if the jarring equatability does not occur the fact that the emending prothorax does not occur but the civilian occurs is incorrect. sent11: that the allometricness occurs and the curvet happens is not correct if the self-destruction does not occur. sent12: the Neanderthalness does not occur if that both the Neanderthalness and the pickings occurs is not correct. sent13: that the counterintelligence does not occur or the civilianness occurs or both hold. sent14: the overexposure happens if the fact that the overexposure does not occur and the crooning does not occur is false. sent15: if that both the emending prothorax and the non-civilianness occurs is false the emending rest does not occur. sent16: that the Neanderthalness and the pickings occurs is wrong if the curveting does not occur. sent17: if that the bisectionalness happens and the jarring equatability happens is not correct that the bisectionalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent18: if the counterintelligence does not occur then the fact that both the emending prothorax and the non-civilianness happens is wrong. sent19: the fact that the escape occurs is true if the overexposure occurs. sent20: that the stain does not occur causes that the curing but not the otherness happens. sent21: the emending overburden does not occur if both the curing and the non-otherness occurs. sent22: that both the non-traumaticness and the operableness happens triggers that the masonicness happens. sent23: if the operableness does not occur then the counterintelligence does not occur and the traumaticness does not occur. sent24: the urticating Steuben does not occur if that both the BAN and the urticating Steuben occurs does not hold. sent25: if the escape but not the emending overburden happens the self-destruction does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the civilian occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the emending prothorax does not occur but the civilianness happens is not false.; sent10 & sent7 -> int2: that the emending prothorax does not occur and the civilian occurs is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the civilian does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the counterintelligence does not occur or the civilian does not occur or both.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the traumaticness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the operableness occurs.; int6 & assump2 -> int7: both the non-traumaticness and the operableness happens.; int7 & sent22 -> int8: the masonicness happens.; __UNKNOWN__