the digit is binary thing that obeys steel.
sent1: The ignorance does clangor spongefly. sent2: if something is not lineal then it is not critical. sent3: if something is both a magnetron and not a footpad it is noncrucial. sent4: if something is a kind of a lawyer then it is a binary. sent5: that the fact that something is both crucial and direct is false if it is a lawyer is right. sent6: if the fact that something is not noncrucial and is not indirect is not correct then it is noncrucial. sent7: the fact that the pitch is both nontranslational and a Muybridge does not hold. sent8: if the dress is indirect then the digit is a lawyer. sent9: the dress is a lawyer and not crucial if the digit is not indirect. sent10: everything is not a footpad. sent11: if the constitutionalist is a kind of a magnetron and it is a kind of a footpad it is noncrucial. sent12: something that clangors ignorance clangors disinfectant. sent13: if that the pitch is nontranslational and it is a Muybridge is not true then it is not nontranslational. sent14: everything is a magnetron and it is not a footpad. sent15: if the pitch is not nontranslational then the fact that it is a kind of a binary and clangors disinfectant is not correct. sent16: the constitutionalist is not a footpad. sent17: if the constitutionalist is noncrucial then the dress is indirect. sent18: the fencer clangors disinfectant. sent19: the spongefly does clangor ignorance. sent20: if that the pitch is a binary that does clangor disinfectant is incorrect the spongefly is not a binary. sent21: if something is a kind of a magnetron that is a kind of a footpad it is noncrucial. sent22: if the spongefly does clangor disinfectant then the fact that the digit obeys steel is not wrong.
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the constitutionalist is a magnetron but not a footpad is correct.; sent3 -> int2: the constitutionalist is noncrucial if it is both a magnetron and not a footpad.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the constitutionalist is noncrucial.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the dress is indirect.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the digit is a kind of a lawyer hold.; sent4 -> int6: if the digit is a kind of a lawyer it is a binary.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the digit is a kind of a binary.; sent12 -> int8: if the fact that the spongefly does clangor ignorance is not incorrect then it clangors disinfectant.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the spongefly clangors disinfectant.; sent22 & int9 -> int10: that the digit does obey steel is not wrong.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the digit is a binary and it obeys steel is not true.
sent6 -> int11: if that the dress is a kind of non-noncrucial thing that is not indirect is not right then it is noncrucial.; sent5 -> int12: that the dress is critical thing that is not indirect is not correct if it is a kind of a lawyer.;
$hypothesis$ = the digit is binary thing that obeys steel. ; $context$ = sent1: The ignorance does clangor spongefly. sent2: if something is not lineal then it is not critical. sent3: if something is both a magnetron and not a footpad it is noncrucial. sent4: if something is a kind of a lawyer then it is a binary. sent5: that the fact that something is both crucial and direct is false if it is a lawyer is right. sent6: if the fact that something is not noncrucial and is not indirect is not correct then it is noncrucial. sent7: the fact that the pitch is both nontranslational and a Muybridge does not hold. sent8: if the dress is indirect then the digit is a lawyer. sent9: the dress is a lawyer and not crucial if the digit is not indirect. sent10: everything is not a footpad. sent11: if the constitutionalist is a kind of a magnetron and it is a kind of a footpad it is noncrucial. sent12: something that clangors ignorance clangors disinfectant. sent13: if that the pitch is nontranslational and it is a Muybridge is not true then it is not nontranslational. sent14: everything is a magnetron and it is not a footpad. sent15: if the pitch is not nontranslational then the fact that it is a kind of a binary and clangors disinfectant is not correct. sent16: the constitutionalist is not a footpad. sent17: if the constitutionalist is noncrucial then the dress is indirect. sent18: the fencer clangors disinfectant. sent19: the spongefly does clangor ignorance. sent20: if that the pitch is a binary that does clangor disinfectant is incorrect the spongefly is not a binary. sent21: if something is a kind of a magnetron that is a kind of a footpad it is noncrucial. sent22: if the spongefly does clangor disinfectant then the fact that the digit obeys steel is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the constitutionalist is a magnetron but not a footpad is correct.; sent3 -> int2: the constitutionalist is noncrucial if it is both a magnetron and not a footpad.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the constitutionalist is noncrucial.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the dress is indirect.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the digit is a kind of a lawyer hold.; sent4 -> int6: if the digit is a kind of a lawyer it is a binary.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the digit is a kind of a binary.; sent12 -> int8: if the fact that the spongefly does clangor ignorance is not incorrect then it clangors disinfectant.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the spongefly clangors disinfectant.; sent22 & int9 -> int10: that the digit does obey steel is not wrong.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__