the tweedling minutes does not occur.
sent1: the nonstop does not occur if the fact that that the nonstop but not the associationalness happens is incorrect is not wrong. sent2: that the nonstop happens but the associationalness does not occur does not hold if the infiniteness happens. sent3: if the fact that both the noselessness and the conceiving happens does not hold then that the outriding does not occur is correct. sent4: the fact that the fact that both the tweedling louvar and the Canadian occurs is not false does not hold if the tweedling dawn does not occur. sent5: the infiniteness does not occur if the non-engagement does not occur. sent6: if the dolichocephalicness does not occur the Rhenish happens and the abdicating lacteal occurs. sent7: if the tweedling louvar does not occur then the fact that both the noselessness and the conceiving happens does not hold. sent8: the associationalness is prevented by the non-engagement and/or that the nonstop happens. sent9: the dolichocephalicness does not occur if the convenientness happens but the limacineness does not occur. sent10: if the Rhenish happens then that the infiniteness does not occur and the undomesticness does not occur is not right. sent11: if the fact that the tweedling louvar occurs and the Canadianness happens is not correct then the tweedling louvar does not occur. sent12: that the tweedling minutes does not occur and the undomesticness occurs is triggered by the non-infiniteness. sent13: the convenientness and the non-limacineness happens if the spluttering sourwood occurs. sent14: the spluttering sourwood occurs and the impoliticness occurs if the outriding does not occur. sent15: if the awakeness occurs then the tweedling dawn does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the non-engagement occurs is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: either the non-engagement occurs or the nonstop occurs or both.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the associationalness does not occur.;
the tweedling minutes occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the tweedling minutes does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the nonstop does not occur if the fact that that the nonstop but not the associationalness happens is incorrect is not wrong. sent2: that the nonstop happens but the associationalness does not occur does not hold if the infiniteness happens. sent3: if the fact that both the noselessness and the conceiving happens does not hold then that the outriding does not occur is correct. sent4: the fact that the fact that both the tweedling louvar and the Canadian occurs is not false does not hold if the tweedling dawn does not occur. sent5: the infiniteness does not occur if the non-engagement does not occur. sent6: if the dolichocephalicness does not occur the Rhenish happens and the abdicating lacteal occurs. sent7: if the tweedling louvar does not occur then the fact that both the noselessness and the conceiving happens does not hold. sent8: the associationalness is prevented by the non-engagement and/or that the nonstop happens. sent9: the dolichocephalicness does not occur if the convenientness happens but the limacineness does not occur. sent10: if the Rhenish happens then that the infiniteness does not occur and the undomesticness does not occur is not right. sent11: if the fact that the tweedling louvar occurs and the Canadianness happens is not correct then the tweedling louvar does not occur. sent12: that the tweedling minutes does not occur and the undomesticness occurs is triggered by the non-infiniteness. sent13: the convenientness and the non-limacineness happens if the spluttering sourwood occurs. sent14: the spluttering sourwood occurs and the impoliticness occurs if the outriding does not occur. sent15: if the awakeness occurs then the tweedling dawn does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the non-engagement occurs is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: either the non-engagement occurs or the nonstop occurs or both.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the associationalness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__