there is something such that if it does demolish then it is meteoritic.
sent1: if the placebo is meteoritic the fact that it is not non-bulbaceous hold. sent2: something is a radicalism if it thrusts Rorschach. sent3: if the placebo does heal nonattendance it is a cereal. sent4: if something is tortious but it does not blunt punch then it is not incongruous. sent5: the placebo is abdominovesical. sent6: if the placebo is not non-algebraic it is not non-meteoritic. sent7: something is meteoritic if it is a kind of a cereal. sent8: if the slippage is a cereal it is not non-hypertonic. sent9: the punch is not meteoritic if it either is a kind of a Kenyan or does not dilate Green or both. sent10: the zoril is not meteoritic if that the placebo is a kind of a coralberry and is meteoritic is incorrect. sent11: the placebo is a kind of a flat. sent12: the placebo is meteoritic if it is a curacy. sent13: if something is antennal it is bulbaceous. sent14: the punch is a Kenyan and/or does not dilate Green if the Green is not incongruous. sent15: the Green is tortious and does not blunt punch. sent16: the placebo does intertwine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the placebo does demolish is not false.; sent7 -> int1: if the placebo is a kind of a cereal the fact that it is meteoritic is not false.;
the zoril demolishes.
sent4 -> int2: that the Green is not incongruous is correct if it is tortious and does not blunt punch.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the Green is not incongruous.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the punch is Kenyan and/or it does not dilate Green.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the punch is not meteoritic.; int5 -> int6: there are non-meteoritic things.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does demolish then it is meteoritic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the placebo is meteoritic the fact that it is not non-bulbaceous hold. sent2: something is a radicalism if it thrusts Rorschach. sent3: if the placebo does heal nonattendance it is a cereal. sent4: if something is tortious but it does not blunt punch then it is not incongruous. sent5: the placebo is abdominovesical. sent6: if the placebo is not non-algebraic it is not non-meteoritic. sent7: something is meteoritic if it is a kind of a cereal. sent8: if the slippage is a cereal it is not non-hypertonic. sent9: the punch is not meteoritic if it either is a kind of a Kenyan or does not dilate Green or both. sent10: the zoril is not meteoritic if that the placebo is a kind of a coralberry and is meteoritic is incorrect. sent11: the placebo is a kind of a flat. sent12: the placebo is meteoritic if it is a curacy. sent13: if something is antennal it is bulbaceous. sent14: the punch is a Kenyan and/or does not dilate Green if the Green is not incongruous. sent15: the Green is tortious and does not blunt punch. sent16: the placebo does intertwine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the placebo does demolish is not false.; sent7 -> int1: if the placebo is a kind of a cereal the fact that it is meteoritic is not false.; __UNKNOWN__