the termer patrols Sparganium.
sent1: that something is not palatoglossal and does not patrol disclosure does not hold if it is monatomic. sent2: if something is prewar that it patrols Sparganium hold. sent3: the fact that the weightlifter does not acquaint khamsin if the weightlifter acidifies hold. sent4: if that something is non-palatoglossal thing that does not patrol disclosure is wrong it patrol disclosure. sent5: the snapline is not prewar if the weightlifter does not acidify and is a Hipsurus. sent6: the isopod is monatomic. sent7: if something is a kind of a reign or it does not acquaint khamsin or both it is prewar. sent8: the lutist does patrol disclosure if the snapline is not prewar. sent9: if something does not patrol disclosure then it is a reign and it is prewar. sent10: that the isopod does not patrol disclosure and is monatomic is not true. sent11: the weightlifter does not acidify. sent12: that the termer does not patrol Sparganium if the lutist is a reign and/or it is palatoglossal is not incorrect. sent13: that the weightlifter acidifies and is a Hipsurus does not hold. sent14: if that the weightlifter does not acidify and is a kind of a Hipsurus is false it does not acquaint khamsin. sent15: the weightlifter is prewar. sent16: that the lutist patrols Sparganium is right if the termer does not patrol disclosure. sent17: if the isopod is monatomic then the weightlifter acquaints khamsin. sent18: the termer is a reign and/or it does not acquaint khamsin if the weightlifter patrols disclosure. sent19: the lutist does patrol disclosure and does reign if the snapline is not prewar.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the weightlifter does not acidify and is a Hipsurus is wrong.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the weightlifter does not acquaint khamsin.; sent17 & sent6 -> int2: the weightlifter does acquaint khamsin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the weightlifter does not acidify and is a kind of a Hipsurus.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the snapline is not prewar.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the lutist patrols disclosure and does reign.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the lutist does not reign is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: the lutist does reign and/or it is palatoglossal.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the caroler does not acquaint khamsin.
sent9 -> int9: the fact that if the weightlifter does not patrol disclosure the weightlifter is a reign and it is not non-prewar is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the termer patrols Sparganium. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not palatoglossal and does not patrol disclosure does not hold if it is monatomic. sent2: if something is prewar that it patrols Sparganium hold. sent3: the fact that the weightlifter does not acquaint khamsin if the weightlifter acidifies hold. sent4: if that something is non-palatoglossal thing that does not patrol disclosure is wrong it patrol disclosure. sent5: the snapline is not prewar if the weightlifter does not acidify and is a Hipsurus. sent6: the isopod is monatomic. sent7: if something is a kind of a reign or it does not acquaint khamsin or both it is prewar. sent8: the lutist does patrol disclosure if the snapline is not prewar. sent9: if something does not patrol disclosure then it is a reign and it is prewar. sent10: that the isopod does not patrol disclosure and is monatomic is not true. sent11: the weightlifter does not acidify. sent12: that the termer does not patrol Sparganium if the lutist is a reign and/or it is palatoglossal is not incorrect. sent13: that the weightlifter acidifies and is a Hipsurus does not hold. sent14: if that the weightlifter does not acidify and is a kind of a Hipsurus is false it does not acquaint khamsin. sent15: the weightlifter is prewar. sent16: that the lutist patrols Sparganium is right if the termer does not patrol disclosure. sent17: if the isopod is monatomic then the weightlifter acquaints khamsin. sent18: the termer is a reign and/or it does not acquaint khamsin if the weightlifter patrols disclosure. sent19: the lutist does patrol disclosure and does reign if the snapline is not prewar. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the weightlifter does not acidify and is a Hipsurus is wrong.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the weightlifter does not acquaint khamsin.; sent17 & sent6 -> int2: the weightlifter does acquaint khamsin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the weightlifter does not acidify and is a kind of a Hipsurus.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the snapline is not prewar.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the lutist patrols disclosure and does reign.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the lutist does not reign is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: the lutist does reign and/or it is palatoglossal.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__