if the stilling occurs then that the freeze does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the fact that not the freezing but the rabbetting Philippians happens is not correct if the stilling occurs. sent2: if the freeze does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians happens then the stilling does not occur. sent3: if the still happens then the fact that the freezing happens and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur is false. sent4: the still does not occur if the freezing but not the rabbetting Philippians happens. sent5: the neoplasticness does not occur. sent6: if the freeze does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur the stillness does not occur. sent7: the stilling yields that the freezing does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur. sent8: that the freeze but not the rabbetting Philippians occurs does not hold. sent9: that the freezing does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur prevents the non-stillness. sent10: that the fact that not the freezing but the rabbetting Philippians happens is true is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freezing does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the still does not occur is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the still happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the freezing does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur is not right.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the stilling occurs then that the freeze does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the freezing but the rabbetting Philippians happens is not correct if the stilling occurs. sent2: if the freeze does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians happens then the stilling does not occur. sent3: if the still happens then the fact that the freezing happens and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur is false. sent4: the still does not occur if the freezing but not the rabbetting Philippians happens. sent5: the neoplasticness does not occur. sent6: if the freeze does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur the stillness does not occur. sent7: the stilling yields that the freezing does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur. sent8: that the freeze but not the rabbetting Philippians occurs does not hold. sent9: that the freezing does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur prevents the non-stillness. sent10: that the fact that not the freezing but the rabbetting Philippians happens is true is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freezing does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the still does not occur is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the still happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the freezing does not occur and the rabbetting Philippians does not occur is not right.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__