the beadsman is not a petrel.
sent1: if that something is a socialism but it is not a kind of a Ultrasuede does not hold that it is not a kind of a socialism is not incorrect. sent2: the wringer is a kind of antediluvian thing that does not covet installation if the hemline is not asynergic. sent3: the hemline is not asynergic. sent4: if something is an ammonia then it is not a repudiation. sent5: if the fact that the chromatography does squawk pya and is not a Noah does not hold then that the beadsman is unorthodox is not false. sent6: that the chromatography squawks pya but it is not a Noah does not hold if the wringer is not a kind of a socialism. sent7: that something is both a socialism and not a Ultrasuede is not correct if it is not a kind of a repudiation. sent8: the wringer is an ammonia if it is a kind of a antediluvian. sent9: the fact that the beadsman is not a tablecloth and does not covet firm does not hold.
the chordophone does not treat eatage and is not a kind of a petrel.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the wringer is not a socialism hold if the fact that it is a socialism and is not a Ultrasuede does not hold.; sent7 -> int2: that the wringer is a socialism but it is not a Ultrasuede is false if it is not a repudiation.; sent4 -> int3: if the wringer is an ammonia it is not a repudiation.; sent2 & sent3 -> int4: the wringer is antediluvian and does not covet installation.; int4 -> int5: the wringer is a antediluvian.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the wringer is an ammonia.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the wringer is not a repudiation.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the wringer is a kind of a socialism but it is not a Ultrasuede is wrong.; int1 & int8 -> int9: the wringer is not a socialism.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: that the chromatography does squawk pya and is not a Noah is not right.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the beadsman is unorthodox.; int11 -> int12: something is unorthodox.;
$hypothesis$ = the beadsman is not a petrel. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a socialism but it is not a kind of a Ultrasuede does not hold that it is not a kind of a socialism is not incorrect. sent2: the wringer is a kind of antediluvian thing that does not covet installation if the hemline is not asynergic. sent3: the hemline is not asynergic. sent4: if something is an ammonia then it is not a repudiation. sent5: if the fact that the chromatography does squawk pya and is not a Noah does not hold then that the beadsman is unorthodox is not false. sent6: that the chromatography squawks pya but it is not a Noah does not hold if the wringer is not a kind of a socialism. sent7: that something is both a socialism and not a Ultrasuede is not correct if it is not a kind of a repudiation. sent8: the wringer is an ammonia if it is a kind of a antediluvian. sent9: the fact that the beadsman is not a tablecloth and does not covet firm does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__