the write-in and the bivalentness occurs.
sent1: if the telephonicness does not occur then the daciticness does not occur. sent2: if the stapling pollucite occurs then the fact that the effort does not occur and the dodge does not occur is not right. sent3: the stapling Gentianaceae occurs. sent4: that the stapling binnacle does not occur and the bibliolatry does not occur does not hold. sent5: the intramolecularness occurs and the acquainting platoon occurs. sent6: if that the dogmatizing arianist happens is not wrong the bivalentness occurs. sent7: if the fact that both the telephonicness and the stapling palmetto happens is false the daciticness does not occur. sent8: the impracticalness does not occur. sent9: the dogmatizing paleographer and the bunking recency occurs. sent10: the dogmatizing paleographer occurs. sent11: if the dogmatizing westerner does not occur the dogmatizing arianist and the acquainting elm happens. sent12: that the telephonicness and the stapling palmetto occurs is wrong if the stapling pollucite does not occur. sent13: the write-in happens if that the effort does not occur and the dodging does not occur is not right. sent14: if the concessiveness happens that the traction does not occur but the discernibleness happens is false. sent15: the dogmatizing westerner does not occur. sent16: the landing does not occur. sent17: the write-in happens if the dodging happens. sent18: that the dogmatizing westerner does not occur leads to that the acquainting elm occurs. sent19: the bunking glutethimide happens if the stapling chelate occurs. sent20: the bunking recency prevents that the daciticness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stapling pollucite does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the telephonicness and the stapling palmetto happens is not true.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the daciticness does not occur is right.; sent9 -> int3: the fact that the bunking recency occurs is right.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the daciticness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the stapling pollucite happens.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: that the effort does not occur and the dodge does not occur does not hold.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the write-in happens.; sent11 & sent15 -> int9: the dogmatizing arianist occurs and the acquainting elm happens.; int9 -> int10: the dogmatizing arianist occurs.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the bivalentness happens.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the write-in occurs and the bivalentness happens is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the write-in and the bivalentness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the telephonicness does not occur then the daciticness does not occur. sent2: if the stapling pollucite occurs then the fact that the effort does not occur and the dodge does not occur is not right. sent3: the stapling Gentianaceae occurs. sent4: that the stapling binnacle does not occur and the bibliolatry does not occur does not hold. sent5: the intramolecularness occurs and the acquainting platoon occurs. sent6: if that the dogmatizing arianist happens is not wrong the bivalentness occurs. sent7: if the fact that both the telephonicness and the stapling palmetto happens is false the daciticness does not occur. sent8: the impracticalness does not occur. sent9: the dogmatizing paleographer and the bunking recency occurs. sent10: the dogmatizing paleographer occurs. sent11: if the dogmatizing westerner does not occur the dogmatizing arianist and the acquainting elm happens. sent12: that the telephonicness and the stapling palmetto occurs is wrong if the stapling pollucite does not occur. sent13: the write-in happens if that the effort does not occur and the dodging does not occur is not right. sent14: if the concessiveness happens that the traction does not occur but the discernibleness happens is false. sent15: the dogmatizing westerner does not occur. sent16: the landing does not occur. sent17: the write-in happens if the dodging happens. sent18: that the dogmatizing westerner does not occur leads to that the acquainting elm occurs. sent19: the bunking glutethimide happens if the stapling chelate occurs. sent20: the bunking recency prevents that the daciticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stapling pollucite does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the telephonicness and the stapling palmetto happens is not true.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the daciticness does not occur is right.; sent9 -> int3: the fact that the bunking recency occurs is right.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the daciticness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the stapling pollucite happens.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: that the effort does not occur and the dodge does not occur does not hold.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the write-in happens.; sent11 & sent15 -> int9: the dogmatizing arianist occurs and the acquainting elm happens.; int9 -> int10: the dogmatizing arianist occurs.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the bivalentness happens.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__