the attrition is not a kind of a assessee.
sent1: if that the Chinook is not a kind of a verbiage is not incorrect the dihydrostreptomycin does staple yak. sent2: if the Chinook demonstrates then the fact that it is non-dipolar and it does not staple yak is false. sent3: the vardenafil is not noncritical if the fact that it is not a Arminian and is not stoic does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that it is a assessee and it is noncritical. sent5: if that the dihydrostreptomycin staples yak is correct then the fact that it does demonstrate is true. sent6: the Chinook demonstrates if that it does not staple Narthecium and is not a kirsch is not right. sent7: the fact that the Chinook does not staple Narthecium and it is not a kind of a kirsch does not hold. sent8: the dihydrostreptomycin staples Narthecium. sent9: if that the Chinook is not a assessee is correct then that the attrition is dipolar is not wrong. sent10: if there is something such that it demonstrates and staples Narthecium then the attrition is not a kind of a assessee. sent11: that the vardenafil is both not Arminian and not a stoic is wrong. sent12: the testee is not a assessee if the fact that the vardenafil is not a kind of a assessee but it is a verbiage is wrong. sent13: the Chinook is not a kind of a verbiage or it is not dipolar or both if the fact that the vardenafil is not noncritical is not incorrect. sent14: that that the vardenafil is a Arminian but it is not a stoic is false is not incorrect. sent15: the fact that the vardenafil is not a kind of a assessee but it is a verbiage is incorrect if the fact that the Chinook is noncritical hold. sent16: The Narthecium staples dihydrostreptomycin. sent17: the vardenafil either does not staple Narthecium or is not noncritical or both.
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the vardenafil is not noncritical.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the Chinook is not a verbiage and/or it is not dipolar.;
the testee is not a assessee.
$hypothesis$ = the attrition is not a kind of a assessee. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Chinook is not a kind of a verbiage is not incorrect the dihydrostreptomycin does staple yak. sent2: if the Chinook demonstrates then the fact that it is non-dipolar and it does not staple yak is false. sent3: the vardenafil is not noncritical if the fact that it is not a Arminian and is not stoic does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that it is a assessee and it is noncritical. sent5: if that the dihydrostreptomycin staples yak is correct then the fact that it does demonstrate is true. sent6: the Chinook demonstrates if that it does not staple Narthecium and is not a kirsch is not right. sent7: the fact that the Chinook does not staple Narthecium and it is not a kind of a kirsch does not hold. sent8: the dihydrostreptomycin staples Narthecium. sent9: if that the Chinook is not a assessee is correct then that the attrition is dipolar is not wrong. sent10: if there is something such that it demonstrates and staples Narthecium then the attrition is not a kind of a assessee. sent11: that the vardenafil is both not Arminian and not a stoic is wrong. sent12: the testee is not a assessee if the fact that the vardenafil is not a kind of a assessee but it is a verbiage is wrong. sent13: the Chinook is not a kind of a verbiage or it is not dipolar or both if the fact that the vardenafil is not noncritical is not incorrect. sent14: that that the vardenafil is a Arminian but it is not a stoic is false is not incorrect. sent15: the fact that the vardenafil is not a kind of a assessee but it is a verbiage is incorrect if the fact that the Chinook is noncritical hold. sent16: The Narthecium staples dihydrostreptomycin. sent17: the vardenafil either does not staple Narthecium or is not noncritical or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the vardenafil is not noncritical.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the Chinook is not a verbiage and/or it is not dipolar.; __UNKNOWN__