the isogram is white-collar.
sent1: if the isogram does hedge editor the stria is white-collar. sent2: the isogram is a sirrah if the sapwood is white-collar. sent3: if the editor does flaunt then the fact that the radiographer is a kind of a Helix is not incorrect. sent4: if the sapwood hedges editor then the stria is a sirrah. sent5: the sapwood is unapologetic if the fact that the navicular is a sirrah is right. sent6: if the fact that the navicular is a kind of a Sarcophaga and is not unapologetic does not hold then the fact that the editor is a kind of a flaunt is not false. sent7: the isogram does hedge editor if the stria is white-collar. sent8: if the isogram is a Sarcophaga then the navicular is white-collar. sent9: that the sapwood does hedge editor is not incorrect. sent10: if the navicular is unapologetic the editor is a kind of a flaunt. sent11: if the radiographer does hedge editor the stria is a Helix. sent12: the stria hedges editor if the sapwood is a sirrah. sent13: if the fact that something is not a kind of a flaunt and it is not a kind of a Helix is not correct then it is not white-collar. sent14: the fact that the stria is allantoic is not wrong if the sapwood is unapologetic. sent15: the stria is allantoic if that the radiographer hedges editor is not wrong. sent16: if the stria hedges editor then the isogram is white-collar. sent17: the navicular flaunts. sent18: if the radiographer is allantoic then the sapwood is a kind of a sirrah. sent19: the fact that the navicular is a Sarcophaga that is not unapologetic is not true. sent20: the editor is not unimpressionable if it is not non-white-collar. sent21: if the stria is allantoic the radiographer hedges editor. sent22: if the navicular does hedge editor then the stria is unapologetic. sent23: the sapwood is white-collar if that the isogram is a sirrah is correct. sent24: the stria is unapologetic. sent25: the fact that the navicular is a kind of a Sarcophaga and it is unapologetic is incorrect. sent26: the navicular hedges editor.
sent6 & sent19 -> int1: that the editor is a kind of a flaunt is not wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the radiographer is a kind of a Helix.;
the isogram is not white-collar.
sent13 -> int3: the isogram is not white-collar if the fact that it is both not a flaunt and not a Helix does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the isogram is white-collar. ; $context$ = sent1: if the isogram does hedge editor the stria is white-collar. sent2: the isogram is a sirrah if the sapwood is white-collar. sent3: if the editor does flaunt then the fact that the radiographer is a kind of a Helix is not incorrect. sent4: if the sapwood hedges editor then the stria is a sirrah. sent5: the sapwood is unapologetic if the fact that the navicular is a sirrah is right. sent6: if the fact that the navicular is a kind of a Sarcophaga and is not unapologetic does not hold then the fact that the editor is a kind of a flaunt is not false. sent7: the isogram does hedge editor if the stria is white-collar. sent8: if the isogram is a Sarcophaga then the navicular is white-collar. sent9: that the sapwood does hedge editor is not incorrect. sent10: if the navicular is unapologetic the editor is a kind of a flaunt. sent11: if the radiographer does hedge editor the stria is a Helix. sent12: the stria hedges editor if the sapwood is a sirrah. sent13: if the fact that something is not a kind of a flaunt and it is not a kind of a Helix is not correct then it is not white-collar. sent14: the fact that the stria is allantoic is not wrong if the sapwood is unapologetic. sent15: the stria is allantoic if that the radiographer hedges editor is not wrong. sent16: if the stria hedges editor then the isogram is white-collar. sent17: the navicular flaunts. sent18: if the radiographer is allantoic then the sapwood is a kind of a sirrah. sent19: the fact that the navicular is a Sarcophaga that is not unapologetic is not true. sent20: the editor is not unimpressionable if it is not non-white-collar. sent21: if the stria is allantoic the radiographer hedges editor. sent22: if the navicular does hedge editor then the stria is unapologetic. sent23: the sapwood is white-collar if that the isogram is a sirrah is correct. sent24: the stria is unapologetic. sent25: the fact that the navicular is a kind of a Sarcophaga and it is unapologetic is incorrect. sent26: the navicular hedges editor. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent19 -> int1: that the editor is a kind of a flaunt is not wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the radiographer is a kind of a Helix.; __UNKNOWN__