the dipteran is not bubonic.
sent1: the cote is an anticipation if that it is not a kind of an anticipation and galls lady is false. sent2: if the cote is not sensory but it is bubonic then the lady is not bimodal. sent3: that the warren is not an anticipation is not wrong if the cote is both a like and an anticipation. sent4: if the warren is both not an anticipation and not sensory then that the internee is not an anticipation hold. sent5: the lady is not a monoblast and jets befoulment if the saint is a kind of a one-and-one. sent6: that the cote is not a kind of an anticipation and does gall lady is wrong. sent7: the warren does not redeploy Olympus if the internee is omnidirectional. sent8: the fact that the lady is not regimental but it is a postdiluvian is incorrect. sent9: if something is bimodal it is both bubonic and not omnidirectional. sent10: the saint is a one-and-one. sent11: that the mid-water is non-sensory hold. sent12: if the lady is bubonic or it is an anticipation or both the dipteran is non-bimodal. sent13: if the fact that something is not regimental but it is a postdiluvian is false then it is a runaway. sent14: if the fact that the internee is an anticipation does not hold then the dipteran is a kind of bimodal thing that redeploys Olympus. sent15: if that the internee is not bimodal is not wrong then the lady is an anticipation. sent16: the lady is both not bimodal and an anticipation if the internee is not bimodal. sent17: if the cote does redeploy Olympus the warren does redeploy Olympus. sent18: the dipteran is not bubonic if the lady is not bimodal but it is an anticipation. sent19: the cote is both not unlike and not non-Eurafrican. sent20: that the warren does not redeploy Olympus is correct if the internee is omnidirectional or it is bimodal or both. sent21: if the cote is sensory then the warren redeploys Olympus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the internee is bimodal.; assump1 -> int1: the internee is omnidirectional or not non-bimodal or both.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the warren does not redeploy Olympus.;
the dipteran is bubonic.
sent9 -> int3: if the dipteran is bimodal it is bubonic and it is not omnidirectional.; sent19 -> int4: the fact that the cote likes hold.; sent1 & sent6 -> int5: the cote is an anticipation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the cote is a kind of a like and it is a kind of an anticipation.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the warren is not an anticipation.; sent13 -> int8: if that the lady is both not regimental and a postdiluvian is not true then it is a runaway.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the lady is a kind of a runaway.; sent5 & sent10 -> int10: the lady is not a monoblast and does jet befoulment.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the lady is not a monoblast is right.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the lady is a kind of a runaway that is not a kind of a monoblast.; int12 -> int13: something is both a runaway and not a monoblast.;
$hypothesis$ = the dipteran is not bubonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the cote is an anticipation if that it is not a kind of an anticipation and galls lady is false. sent2: if the cote is not sensory but it is bubonic then the lady is not bimodal. sent3: that the warren is not an anticipation is not wrong if the cote is both a like and an anticipation. sent4: if the warren is both not an anticipation and not sensory then that the internee is not an anticipation hold. sent5: the lady is not a monoblast and jets befoulment if the saint is a kind of a one-and-one. sent6: that the cote is not a kind of an anticipation and does gall lady is wrong. sent7: the warren does not redeploy Olympus if the internee is omnidirectional. sent8: the fact that the lady is not regimental but it is a postdiluvian is incorrect. sent9: if something is bimodal it is both bubonic and not omnidirectional. sent10: the saint is a one-and-one. sent11: that the mid-water is non-sensory hold. sent12: if the lady is bubonic or it is an anticipation or both the dipteran is non-bimodal. sent13: if the fact that something is not regimental but it is a postdiluvian is false then it is a runaway. sent14: if the fact that the internee is an anticipation does not hold then the dipteran is a kind of bimodal thing that redeploys Olympus. sent15: if that the internee is not bimodal is not wrong then the lady is an anticipation. sent16: the lady is both not bimodal and an anticipation if the internee is not bimodal. sent17: if the cote does redeploy Olympus the warren does redeploy Olympus. sent18: the dipteran is not bubonic if the lady is not bimodal but it is an anticipation. sent19: the cote is both not unlike and not non-Eurafrican. sent20: that the warren does not redeploy Olympus is correct if the internee is omnidirectional or it is bimodal or both. sent21: if the cote is sensory then the warren redeploys Olympus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the internee is bimodal.; assump1 -> int1: the internee is omnidirectional or not non-bimodal or both.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the warren does not redeploy Olympus.; __UNKNOWN__