the gametoecium does not refrain opposition.
sent1: if the kingfish is robotic thing that does land kingfish it is not a kind of a endothelium. sent2: if something is a endothelium then it gorges NLRB. sent3: something does not refrain opposition if it is intramural. sent4: the inulin does gorge NLRB if the polecat is not non-intramural. sent5: the kingfish is a endothelium if the inulin does gorge NLRB. sent6: if the polecat is not intramural then the gametoecium is not a bassinet and is intramural. sent7: something is a endothelium if the fact that it is not a bassinet and it is not a endothelium is not correct. sent8: if something gorges NLRB it does not refrain opposition and is intramural. sent9: the fact that the inulin is not a endothelium is true. sent10: the kingfish is robotic and it does land kingfish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polecat is intramural.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the inulin gorges NLRB.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the kingfish is a kind of a endothelium.; sent1 & sent10 -> int3: the kingfish is not a endothelium.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the polecat is not intramural.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the gametoecium is not a kind of a bassinet and is intramural.; int6 -> int7: the gametoecium is intramural.; sent3 -> int8: if that the gametoecium is not non-intramural hold then it does not refrain opposition.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the flatware does not refrain opposition.
sent8 -> int9: if the polecat gorges NLRB then it does not refrain opposition and it is intramural.; sent7 -> int10: if the fact that the polecat is not a kind of a bassinet and it is not a endothelium is false then it is a endothelium.; sent2 -> int11: the polecat gorges NLRB if the fact that it is a endothelium hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the gametoecium does not refrain opposition. ; $context$ = sent1: if the kingfish is robotic thing that does land kingfish it is not a kind of a endothelium. sent2: if something is a endothelium then it gorges NLRB. sent3: something does not refrain opposition if it is intramural. sent4: the inulin does gorge NLRB if the polecat is not non-intramural. sent5: the kingfish is a endothelium if the inulin does gorge NLRB. sent6: if the polecat is not intramural then the gametoecium is not a bassinet and is intramural. sent7: something is a endothelium if the fact that it is not a bassinet and it is not a endothelium is not correct. sent8: if something gorges NLRB it does not refrain opposition and is intramural. sent9: the fact that the inulin is not a endothelium is true. sent10: the kingfish is robotic and it does land kingfish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polecat is intramural.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the inulin gorges NLRB.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the kingfish is a kind of a endothelium.; sent1 & sent10 -> int3: the kingfish is not a endothelium.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the polecat is not intramural.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the gametoecium is not a kind of a bassinet and is intramural.; int6 -> int7: the gametoecium is intramural.; sent3 -> int8: if that the gametoecium is not non-intramural hold then it does not refrain opposition.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__