if the watering does not occur the unreproducibleness happens and the drinking dairy happens.
sent1: the apogamicness does not occur. sent2: the drinking dairy occurs. sent3: the complication happens. sent4: the vasovasostomy does not occur. sent5: the emoting Serkin happens if the fact that the misappropriation does not occur and the emoting Serkin does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the drinking disability happens is triggered by that both the disavowing invisibility and the distribution happens. sent7: that the watering and the misappropriation happens prevents that the unreproducibleness does not occur. sent8: the chlorophylloseness does not occur. sent9: the denationalizing crotchet happens if the drinking downshift does not occur and the demurring happens. sent10: if that the watering occurs is not wrong then the unreproducibleness occurs and the drinking dairy occurs. sent11: the drinking sax does not occur and the emoting Serkin happens. sent12: the denationalizing crotchet does not occur and the starlessness occurs. sent13: that the establishment does not occur brings about that both the emoting chartered and the denationalizing Nansen occurs. sent14: the giveaway occurs. sent15: that the Transfiguration happens is right. sent16: both the neglecting and the trading happens if the systematicness does not occur. sent17: that not the watering but the misappropriation occurs brings about that the unreproducibleness occurs. sent18: the cardiospasm occurs. sent19: both the chordateness and the drinking downshift occurs if the shattering does not occur. sent20: not the emoting Taurotragus but the plowing occurs. sent21: the Iberian does not occur. sent22: the misappropriation happens. sent23: the nonindustrialness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the watering does not occur.; assump1 & sent22 -> int1: not the watering but the misappropriation happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the unreproducibleness occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the unreproducibleness occurs and the drinking dairy happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the emoting Serkin happens and the systematicness happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the watering does not occur the unreproducibleness happens and the drinking dairy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the apogamicness does not occur. sent2: the drinking dairy occurs. sent3: the complication happens. sent4: the vasovasostomy does not occur. sent5: the emoting Serkin happens if the fact that the misappropriation does not occur and the emoting Serkin does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the drinking disability happens is triggered by that both the disavowing invisibility and the distribution happens. sent7: that the watering and the misappropriation happens prevents that the unreproducibleness does not occur. sent8: the chlorophylloseness does not occur. sent9: the denationalizing crotchet happens if the drinking downshift does not occur and the demurring happens. sent10: if that the watering occurs is not wrong then the unreproducibleness occurs and the drinking dairy occurs. sent11: the drinking sax does not occur and the emoting Serkin happens. sent12: the denationalizing crotchet does not occur and the starlessness occurs. sent13: that the establishment does not occur brings about that both the emoting chartered and the denationalizing Nansen occurs. sent14: the giveaway occurs. sent15: that the Transfiguration happens is right. sent16: both the neglecting and the trading happens if the systematicness does not occur. sent17: that not the watering but the misappropriation occurs brings about that the unreproducibleness occurs. sent18: the cardiospasm occurs. sent19: both the chordateness and the drinking downshift occurs if the shattering does not occur. sent20: not the emoting Taurotragus but the plowing occurs. sent21: the Iberian does not occur. sent22: the misappropriation happens. sent23: the nonindustrialness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the watering does not occur.; assump1 & sent22 -> int1: not the watering but the misappropriation happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the unreproducibleness occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the unreproducibleness occurs and the drinking dairy happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__