there exists something such that if it is a kind of a manifesto that it does not deafen volution and/or is not high-tech is not correct.
sent1: either the weekender does not deafen volution or it is not a kind of a lingual or both if it mourns. sent2: the fact that the striatum does not deafen volution or it does not summer or both is not right if it is axial. sent3: the weekender does not deafen volution and/or is not high-tech if it is a manifesto. sent4: the weekender is high-tech if it is a kind of a manifesto. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a manifesto is correct then the fact that it deafens volution and/or it is not high-tech is not true. sent6: that something is not a burbot and/or it is not a putrefaction is false if it is a kind of a today. sent7: there is something such that if it is a manifesto then either it does not deafen volution or it is not high-tech or both. sent8: the fact that the fact that the weekender is not a kind of a Lyly and/or it does not stripe hold is not right if it is a lady's-eardrop. sent9: if the weekender is high-tech it is not a kind of a putrefaction and/or it does not read vanguard. sent10: if the beneficiary captures Hymen that either it is not a Chaetodontidae or it does not discharge or both does not hold. sent11: the weekender does not deafen Arrhenius and/or it does not deafen communication if it deafens volution. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a manifesto it is high-tech. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a manifesto then the fact that it either does not deafen volution or is high-tech or both is false. sent14: that the redstart is not a Shavian and/or it is not high-tech does not hold if it is subatomic. sent15: there is something such that if it is a manifesto then it deafens volution. sent16: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a guard the fact that it is not radiolucent or does not fume or both is not right is correct. sent17: if the weekender is noncaloric it either is not high-tech or does not read trey or both. sent18: the fact that the trey is not a bank and/or it does not deafen volution is false if it does capture Milk. sent19: if the weekender is a manifesto that either it does not deafen volution or it is not high-tech or both is false. sent20: if the weekender is a manifesto then the fact that it does deafen volution or it is not high-tech or both does not hold. sent21: if something is communal then that it is not demagogic or it is not a Saharan or both is incorrect.
sent19 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the weekender is not demagogic and/or is not a Saharan is wrong if it is communal.
sent21 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a manifesto that it does not deafen volution and/or is not high-tech is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: either the weekender does not deafen volution or it is not a kind of a lingual or both if it mourns. sent2: the fact that the striatum does not deafen volution or it does not summer or both is not right if it is axial. sent3: the weekender does not deafen volution and/or is not high-tech if it is a manifesto. sent4: the weekender is high-tech if it is a kind of a manifesto. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a manifesto is correct then the fact that it deafens volution and/or it is not high-tech is not true. sent6: that something is not a burbot and/or it is not a putrefaction is false if it is a kind of a today. sent7: there is something such that if it is a manifesto then either it does not deafen volution or it is not high-tech or both. sent8: the fact that the fact that the weekender is not a kind of a Lyly and/or it does not stripe hold is not right if it is a lady's-eardrop. sent9: if the weekender is high-tech it is not a kind of a putrefaction and/or it does not read vanguard. sent10: if the beneficiary captures Hymen that either it is not a Chaetodontidae or it does not discharge or both does not hold. sent11: the weekender does not deafen Arrhenius and/or it does not deafen communication if it deafens volution. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a manifesto it is high-tech. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a manifesto then the fact that it either does not deafen volution or is high-tech or both is false. sent14: that the redstart is not a Shavian and/or it is not high-tech does not hold if it is subatomic. sent15: there is something such that if it is a manifesto then it deafens volution. sent16: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a guard the fact that it is not radiolucent or does not fume or both is not right is correct. sent17: if the weekender is noncaloric it either is not high-tech or does not read trey or both. sent18: the fact that the trey is not a bank and/or it does not deafen volution is false if it does capture Milk. sent19: if the weekender is a manifesto that either it does not deafen volution or it is not high-tech or both is false. sent20: if the weekender is a manifesto then the fact that it does deafen volution or it is not high-tech or both does not hold. sent21: if something is communal then that it is not demagogic or it is not a Saharan or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__