the call brachiates.
sent1: the crankcase brachiates. sent2: there is something such that it is a Xenopus. sent3: if the fact that the asparagus does brachiate and is caffeinic is true then the call does not brachiate. sent4: the asparagus is not a aperitif if the sunfish is a brood that is pineal. sent5: the sunfish is a brood and it does honey Cichorium if there is something such that it is a Xenopus. sent6: the call honeys renunciation and is caffeinic. sent7: there is nothing that is a transubstantiation and does not honey lavaliere. sent8: if the sunfish is a slum then it is pineal. sent9: if something is not a aperitif it is caffeinic and does honey renunciation. sent10: if the call does honey renunciation it does brachiate. sent11: something is not a transubstantiation and it does not honey lavaliere if it is nonadhesive. sent12: everything does torture sugarplum. sent13: the asparagus does brachiate if something is not a transubstantiation and does not honey lavaliere. sent14: that the call is caffeinic is not wrong. sent15: something is nonadhesive if it does torture sugarplum.
sent6 -> int1: the call honeys renunciation.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the call does not brachiate is correct.
sent11 -> int2: the ovule is not a transubstantiation and it does not honey lavaliere if it is nonadhesive.; sent15 -> int3: the ovule is nonadhesive if it does torture sugarplum.; sent12 -> int4: the ovule tortures sugarplum.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ovule is not adhesive.; int2 & int5 -> int6: that the ovule is not a transubstantiation and it does not honey lavaliere is correct.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a transubstantiation and it does not honey lavaliere.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the asparagus does brachiate.; sent9 -> int9: the asparagus is caffeinic and does honey renunciation if it is not a aperitif.; sent2 & sent5 -> int10: the sunfish does brood and it honeys Cichorium.; int10 -> int11: the sunfish is a brood.;
$hypothesis$ = the call brachiates. ; $context$ = sent1: the crankcase brachiates. sent2: there is something such that it is a Xenopus. sent3: if the fact that the asparagus does brachiate and is caffeinic is true then the call does not brachiate. sent4: the asparagus is not a aperitif if the sunfish is a brood that is pineal. sent5: the sunfish is a brood and it does honey Cichorium if there is something such that it is a Xenopus. sent6: the call honeys renunciation and is caffeinic. sent7: there is nothing that is a transubstantiation and does not honey lavaliere. sent8: if the sunfish is a slum then it is pineal. sent9: if something is not a aperitif it is caffeinic and does honey renunciation. sent10: if the call does honey renunciation it does brachiate. sent11: something is not a transubstantiation and it does not honey lavaliere if it is nonadhesive. sent12: everything does torture sugarplum. sent13: the asparagus does brachiate if something is not a transubstantiation and does not honey lavaliere. sent14: that the call is caffeinic is not wrong. sent15: something is nonadhesive if it does torture sugarplum. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the call honeys renunciation.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__