the timber is not a headmastership.
sent1: if that the Viyella is a wishfulness or it is irreversible or both is wrong then the topaz is not a kind of a Leonard. sent2: the timber is not a kind of a headmastership if the spodumene is not a kind of a blurred. sent3: that the spodumene blurs and it deplores Viyella does not hold if the topaz is not a kind of a Leonard. sent4: the fact that the fist is not a Leonard and/or it does not deplore Viyella does not hold if it does blur. sent5: that the topaz is non-irreversible hold. sent6: that the timber is not a kind of a headmastership hold if that the spodumene is a blurred and it deplores Viyella is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the timber is not irreversible and does not impair superposition is wrong if the athlete is a wishfulness. sent8: if that either the athlete impairs Kennewick or it is a Sceliphron or both is not correct then the fist does not impair superposition. sent9: if there exists something such that it does not impair superposition then the fact that the fact that the Viyella is a wishfulness and/or it is irreversible is wrong is not wrong. sent10: if that something is non-irreversible thing that does not impair superposition is not correct it is a kind of a headmastership.
the timber is a headmastership.
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that the timber is a kind of non-irreversible thing that does not impair superposition does not hold it is a kind of a headmastership.;
$hypothesis$ = the timber is not a headmastership. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Viyella is a wishfulness or it is irreversible or both is wrong then the topaz is not a kind of a Leonard. sent2: the timber is not a kind of a headmastership if the spodumene is not a kind of a blurred. sent3: that the spodumene blurs and it deplores Viyella does not hold if the topaz is not a kind of a Leonard. sent4: the fact that the fist is not a Leonard and/or it does not deplore Viyella does not hold if it does blur. sent5: that the topaz is non-irreversible hold. sent6: that the timber is not a kind of a headmastership hold if that the spodumene is a blurred and it deplores Viyella is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the timber is not irreversible and does not impair superposition is wrong if the athlete is a wishfulness. sent8: if that either the athlete impairs Kennewick or it is a Sceliphron or both is not correct then the fist does not impair superposition. sent9: if there exists something such that it does not impair superposition then the fact that the fact that the Viyella is a wishfulness and/or it is irreversible is wrong is not wrong. sent10: if that something is non-irreversible thing that does not impair superposition is not correct it is a kind of a headmastership. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__