the ovary is not unfree and is a ctene.
sent1: the ovary is not propitious if there is something such that that it disrupts and it does not unbend amberjack is not true. sent2: if that the distortionist is both sacramental and not a uniform is wrong then it is not a kind of an inhalant. sent3: if the soup-strainer does not convoy continuance or it does not unbend amberjack or both the distortionist is an inhalant. sent4: the soup-strainer does disrupt. sent5: the distortionist is not a kind of an inhalant if it uniforms. sent6: the fact that something is not unfree and is a ctene is false if it is unpropitious. sent7: the fact that the fact that something is a off-season that is not a Kirchner is wrong if it does disrupt hold. sent8: the fact that the distortionist is sacramental but it is not a uniform is false. sent9: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it does disrupt and it unbends amberjack is not incorrect is false. sent10: that something is a kind of unfree thing that is a ctene is incorrect if it is not propitious.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the soup-strainer disrupts and does not unbend amberjack.; assump1 -> int1: the soup-strainer does not unbend amberjack.; int1 -> int2: the soup-strainer either does not convoy continuance or does not unbend amberjack or both.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the distortionist is an inhalant.; sent2 & sent8 -> int4: the distortionist is not inhalant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the soup-strainer does disrupt and does not unbend amberjack does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it does disrupt and does not unbend amberjack does not hold.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the ovary is not propitious.; sent6 -> int9: if the ovary is not propitious the fact that it is a kind of free a ctene is not true.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the luncher is a off-season and is not a Kirchner is wrong.
sent7 -> int10: that the luncher is a off-season that is not a Kirchner does not hold if it does disrupt.;
$hypothesis$ = the ovary is not unfree and is a ctene. ; $context$ = sent1: the ovary is not propitious if there is something such that that it disrupts and it does not unbend amberjack is not true. sent2: if that the distortionist is both sacramental and not a uniform is wrong then it is not a kind of an inhalant. sent3: if the soup-strainer does not convoy continuance or it does not unbend amberjack or both the distortionist is an inhalant. sent4: the soup-strainer does disrupt. sent5: the distortionist is not a kind of an inhalant if it uniforms. sent6: the fact that something is not unfree and is a ctene is false if it is unpropitious. sent7: the fact that the fact that something is a off-season that is not a Kirchner is wrong if it does disrupt hold. sent8: the fact that the distortionist is sacramental but it is not a uniform is false. sent9: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it does disrupt and it unbends amberjack is not incorrect is false. sent10: that something is a kind of unfree thing that is a ctene is incorrect if it is not propitious. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the soup-strainer disrupts and does not unbend amberjack.; assump1 -> int1: the soup-strainer does not unbend amberjack.; int1 -> int2: the soup-strainer either does not convoy continuance or does not unbend amberjack or both.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the distortionist is an inhalant.; sent2 & sent8 -> int4: the distortionist is not inhalant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the soup-strainer does disrupt and does not unbend amberjack does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it does disrupt and does not unbend amberjack does not hold.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the ovary is not propitious.; sent6 -> int9: if the ovary is not propitious the fact that it is a kind of free a ctene is not true.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__