there is something such that if it does not impede Shankar it does not side vampirism and is not conjunctive.
sent1: if the ailanthus does not side mesa it is not a one-liner and it does not impede Shankar. sent2: if the ailanthus does not impede Shankar it does not side vampirism and is not conjunctive. sent3: there is something such that if it impedes Shankar it does not side vampirism and it is not conjunctive. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not impede Shankar it does not side vampirism. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not tangible then it is not galactic and it is not opposite. sent6: there is something such that if it is not buccal that it does impede check and does not engineer is right. sent7: if the diastrophism is not a burl it is not conjunctive and not a Carboniferous. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not impede Shankar then that it is not conjunctive is not false. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not impede Shankar then it does not side vampirism and it is conjunctive. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a isometric then it is a resuspension and it is not inconstant. sent11: if the ailanthus does not impede Shankar it does side vampirism and it is not conjunctive. sent12: if something is not a strikeout then it is not a Eriophorum and does not impede amity. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a vocation then it does not impede moon-worship and is not latter. sent14: the ailanthus does not side vampirism and it is not conjunctive if it does impede Shankar. sent15: the blues does not side ethicist if it does not caper.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a strikeout then it is not a kind of a Eriophorum and it does not impede amity.
sent12 -> int1: if the check is not a strikeout then it is not a Eriophorum and it does not impede amity.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not impede Shankar it does not side vampirism and is not conjunctive. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ailanthus does not side mesa it is not a one-liner and it does not impede Shankar. sent2: if the ailanthus does not impede Shankar it does not side vampirism and is not conjunctive. sent3: there is something such that if it impedes Shankar it does not side vampirism and it is not conjunctive. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not impede Shankar it does not side vampirism. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not tangible then it is not galactic and it is not opposite. sent6: there is something such that if it is not buccal that it does impede check and does not engineer is right. sent7: if the diastrophism is not a burl it is not conjunctive and not a Carboniferous. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not impede Shankar then that it is not conjunctive is not false. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not impede Shankar then it does not side vampirism and it is conjunctive. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a isometric then it is a resuspension and it is not inconstant. sent11: if the ailanthus does not impede Shankar it does side vampirism and it is not conjunctive. sent12: if something is not a strikeout then it is not a Eriophorum and does not impede amity. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a vocation then it does not impede moon-worship and is not latter. sent14: the ailanthus does not side vampirism and it is not conjunctive if it does impede Shankar. sent15: the blues does not side ethicist if it does not caper. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__