the hostilities occurs.
sent1: the retail does not occur and the gazing happens. sent2: the culdoscopy does not occur. sent3: that the untranslatableness does not occur results in that the normalizing peripeteia does not occur and the diametralness does not occur. sent4: the leg happens. sent5: if the gaze does not occur then the leg does not occur and the retailing does not occur. sent6: the retroflection is prevented by that the tingeing steeplechaser and the hostilities happens. sent7: that the upgrading ligation occurs and the trustfulness occurs leads to the non-untranslatableness. sent8: that the tooth happens is not incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the tingeing steeplechaser does not occur hold that the hostilities happens but the tingeing frosting does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the tingeing steeplechaser occurs is caused by that the culdoscopy does not occur and the trajectory does not occur. sent11: if the retailing does not occur the rh-negativeness and the leg happens. sent12: that the rh-negativeness and the basipetalness happens brings about that the tingeing steeplechaser does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the hostilities happens and the tingeing frosting does not occur is false the hostilities does not occur. sent14: the tingeing frosting is triggered by that the tingeing steeplechaser but not the hostilities occurs. sent15: not the gaze but the sinking happens if the normalizing peripeteia does not occur. sent16: the culdoscopy does not occur and the trajectory does not occur. sent17: if the retailing does not occur the leg happens. sent18: the gazing happens. sent19: both the rh-negativeness and the basipetalness happens if the leg does not occur.
sent10 & sent16 -> int1: the tingeing steeplechaser happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hostilities does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tingeing steeplechaser but not the hostilities happens.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the tingeing frosting occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the tingeing frosting and/or the basipetalness happens is correct.; sent1 -> int5: the retail does not occur.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the rh-negativeness and the leg happens.; int6 -> int7: the rh-negativeness happens.;
that the hostilities does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = the hostilities occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the retail does not occur and the gazing happens. sent2: the culdoscopy does not occur. sent3: that the untranslatableness does not occur results in that the normalizing peripeteia does not occur and the diametralness does not occur. sent4: the leg happens. sent5: if the gaze does not occur then the leg does not occur and the retailing does not occur. sent6: the retroflection is prevented by that the tingeing steeplechaser and the hostilities happens. sent7: that the upgrading ligation occurs and the trustfulness occurs leads to the non-untranslatableness. sent8: that the tooth happens is not incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the tingeing steeplechaser does not occur hold that the hostilities happens but the tingeing frosting does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the tingeing steeplechaser occurs is caused by that the culdoscopy does not occur and the trajectory does not occur. sent11: if the retailing does not occur the rh-negativeness and the leg happens. sent12: that the rh-negativeness and the basipetalness happens brings about that the tingeing steeplechaser does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the hostilities happens and the tingeing frosting does not occur is false the hostilities does not occur. sent14: the tingeing frosting is triggered by that the tingeing steeplechaser but not the hostilities occurs. sent15: not the gaze but the sinking happens if the normalizing peripeteia does not occur. sent16: the culdoscopy does not occur and the trajectory does not occur. sent17: if the retailing does not occur the leg happens. sent18: the gazing happens. sent19: both the rh-negativeness and the basipetalness happens if the leg does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent16 -> int1: the tingeing steeplechaser happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hostilities does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tingeing steeplechaser but not the hostilities happens.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the tingeing frosting occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the tingeing frosting and/or the basipetalness happens is correct.; sent1 -> int5: the retail does not occur.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the rh-negativeness and the leg happens.; int6 -> int7: the rh-negativeness happens.; __UNKNOWN__