that the horst does reposition and is not a seasonal is not correct if the great-nephew is a kind of a marang.
sent1: that the horst is a seasonal but it does not reposition is not right if the eel does reposition. sent2: that the great-nephew is a seasonal but it is not a kind of a marang is false. sent3: that the horst is a kind of a marang but it does not reposition is false. sent4: if the eel is a seasonal that the horst does reposition and is not a seasonal is incorrect. sent5: if the great-nephew repositions then the horst is a marang. sent6: if the horst is a kind of a seasonal the eel is a marang. sent7: the great-nephew does reposition. sent8: the great-nephew is cryogenic. sent9: the great-nephew is cannibalistic. sent10: the horst does reposition but it is not a kind of a seasonal. sent11: if the great-nephew is a kind of a marang the fact that the horst does reposition and is a seasonal is not right. sent12: that the horst repositions and it is a kind of a seasonal is not right if the eel is a seasonal. sent13: the fact that the horst does reposition and it is a seasonal does not hold. sent14: if the eel is a kind of a seasonal then the fact that the great-nephew is a kind of a marang and is not a kind of a seasonal is not true. sent15: the horst does reposition and is not a kind of a seasonal if the eel is a seasonal. sent16: that the eel does reposition but it is not seasonal is wrong if the horst is a kind of a seasonal. sent17: the great-nephew does commit. sent18: the fact that the great-nephew is a marang but it is not seasonal is incorrect if the horst is a seasonal. sent19: if the great-nephew is a marang the fact that the eel is a kind of seasonal thing that does not reposition is not right. sent20: the fact that the horst repositions but it is not a seasonal if the great-nephew is a kind of a marang is right. sent21: that the eel repositions is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the horst does reposition and is not a seasonal is not correct if the great-nephew is a kind of a marang. ; $context$ = sent1: that the horst is a seasonal but it does not reposition is not right if the eel does reposition. sent2: that the great-nephew is a seasonal but it is not a kind of a marang is false. sent3: that the horst is a kind of a marang but it does not reposition is false. sent4: if the eel is a seasonal that the horst does reposition and is not a seasonal is incorrect. sent5: if the great-nephew repositions then the horst is a marang. sent6: if the horst is a kind of a seasonal the eel is a marang. sent7: the great-nephew does reposition. sent8: the great-nephew is cryogenic. sent9: the great-nephew is cannibalistic. sent10: the horst does reposition but it is not a kind of a seasonal. sent11: if the great-nephew is a kind of a marang the fact that the horst does reposition and is a seasonal is not right. sent12: that the horst repositions and it is a kind of a seasonal is not right if the eel is a seasonal. sent13: the fact that the horst does reposition and it is a seasonal does not hold. sent14: if the eel is a kind of a seasonal then the fact that the great-nephew is a kind of a marang and is not a kind of a seasonal is not true. sent15: the horst does reposition and is not a kind of a seasonal if the eel is a seasonal. sent16: that the eel does reposition but it is not seasonal is wrong if the horst is a kind of a seasonal. sent17: the great-nephew does commit. sent18: the fact that the great-nephew is a marang but it is not seasonal is incorrect if the horst is a seasonal. sent19: if the great-nephew is a marang the fact that the eel is a kind of seasonal thing that does not reposition is not right. sent20: the fact that the horst repositions but it is not a seasonal if the great-nephew is a kind of a marang is right. sent21: that the eel repositions is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__