the benthicness happens.
sent1: the fact that the acting spadefoot does not occur and the bending trespass does not occur is not true. sent2: the phylogeneticness does not occur. sent3: the bending crosier does not occur and the bending unison does not occur. sent4: that the condoling polka happens is correct. sent5: the accomplishment happens. sent6: that the acidimetry does not occur and the refresher does not occur is not right. sent7: the Oblation does not occur. sent8: the celebration does not occur. sent9: the fragrantness does not occur. sent10: the program does not occur and the socialisticness does not occur. sent11: that the bending crosier occurs and the clapping does not occur does not hold. sent12: the non-benthicness is triggered by either that the chauvinisticness does not occur or that the accomplishment does not occur or both. sent13: the biosyntheticness happens if that the bending rancidity does not occur and the agroundness does not occur is not right. sent14: the bending crosier results in the agroundness. sent15: the quadratics happens. sent16: the fact that the Huxleyanness does not occur is true. sent17: if that the tankage does not occur and the bibliothecalness does not occur does not hold then the glottochronologicalness happens. sent18: the concerning huckster does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the chauvinisticness does not occur and the accomplishment does not occur is not true then the benthicness occurs. sent20: the gladiatorialness does not occur and the conventionalization does not occur. sent21: that the preoccupation happens and the concerning huckster does not occur does not hold. sent22: if the fact that the concerning dado does not occur and the acting embankment does not occur does not hold the latinateness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chauvinisticness does not occur and the accomplishment does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the accomplishment does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the chauvinisticness does not occur and the accomplishment does not occur is not right.; sent19 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the benthicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the benthicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the acting spadefoot does not occur and the bending trespass does not occur is not true. sent2: the phylogeneticness does not occur. sent3: the bending crosier does not occur and the bending unison does not occur. sent4: that the condoling polka happens is correct. sent5: the accomplishment happens. sent6: that the acidimetry does not occur and the refresher does not occur is not right. sent7: the Oblation does not occur. sent8: the celebration does not occur. sent9: the fragrantness does not occur. sent10: the program does not occur and the socialisticness does not occur. sent11: that the bending crosier occurs and the clapping does not occur does not hold. sent12: the non-benthicness is triggered by either that the chauvinisticness does not occur or that the accomplishment does not occur or both. sent13: the biosyntheticness happens if that the bending rancidity does not occur and the agroundness does not occur is not right. sent14: the bending crosier results in the agroundness. sent15: the quadratics happens. sent16: the fact that the Huxleyanness does not occur is true. sent17: if that the tankage does not occur and the bibliothecalness does not occur does not hold then the glottochronologicalness happens. sent18: the concerning huckster does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the chauvinisticness does not occur and the accomplishment does not occur is not true then the benthicness occurs. sent20: the gladiatorialness does not occur and the conventionalization does not occur. sent21: that the preoccupation happens and the concerning huckster does not occur does not hold. sent22: if the fact that the concerning dado does not occur and the acting embankment does not occur does not hold the latinateness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chauvinisticness does not occur and the accomplishment does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the accomplishment does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the chauvinisticness does not occur and the accomplishment does not occur is not right.; sent19 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__