if the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic the toupee is etymological but it is not a beak.
sent1: the fact that something does not deaminate tablecloth is not incorrect if it is non-bacteriophagic. sent2: the fact that the toupee is not a beak is not false if it is not pudendal. sent3: if that the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic hold then it does not deaminate tablecloth. sent4: something is not a kind of an inlay and it does not deaminate tablecloth if it is not bacteriophagic. sent5: if the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic then the toupee is not a beak. sent6: the toupee is not pudendal if the Rottweiler is not an inlay and does not deaminate tablecloth. sent7: the toupee is not a kind of a beak. sent8: the toupee is etymological but it is not a kind of a beak if the Rottweiler is bacteriophagic. sent9: the Rottweiler is non-etymological. sent10: something is etymological but it is not a beak if it is not pudendal. sent11: the fact that something is not a beak is not false if it is not pudendal. sent12: something is not a kind of an inlay and it does not deaminate tablecloth if it is bacteriophagic. sent13: that the toupee is not pudendal is right if the Rottweiler is not a kind of an inlay and does deaminate tablecloth. sent14: the Rottweiler does not deaminate tablecloth. sent15: the boom does deaminate intriguing but it is not a kind of an inferior. sent16: if the Rottweiler is bacteriophagic it is not an inlay and it does not deaminate tablecloth.
sent4 -> int1: if the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic then it is not an inlay and does not deaminate tablecloth.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Rottweiler does not inlay and does not deaminate tablecloth.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the toupee is not pudendal.; sent10 -> int4: if the toupee is not pudendal it is etymological and is not a beak.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the toupee is etymological but it is not a kind of a beak.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic the toupee is etymological but it is not a beak. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not deaminate tablecloth is not incorrect if it is non-bacteriophagic. sent2: the fact that the toupee is not a beak is not false if it is not pudendal. sent3: if that the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic hold then it does not deaminate tablecloth. sent4: something is not a kind of an inlay and it does not deaminate tablecloth if it is not bacteriophagic. sent5: if the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic then the toupee is not a beak. sent6: the toupee is not pudendal if the Rottweiler is not an inlay and does not deaminate tablecloth. sent7: the toupee is not a kind of a beak. sent8: the toupee is etymological but it is not a kind of a beak if the Rottweiler is bacteriophagic. sent9: the Rottweiler is non-etymological. sent10: something is etymological but it is not a beak if it is not pudendal. sent11: the fact that something is not a beak is not false if it is not pudendal. sent12: something is not a kind of an inlay and it does not deaminate tablecloth if it is bacteriophagic. sent13: that the toupee is not pudendal is right if the Rottweiler is not a kind of an inlay and does deaminate tablecloth. sent14: the Rottweiler does not deaminate tablecloth. sent15: the boom does deaminate intriguing but it is not a kind of an inferior. sent16: if the Rottweiler is bacteriophagic it is not an inlay and it does not deaminate tablecloth. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic then it is not an inlay and does not deaminate tablecloth.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Rottweiler is not bacteriophagic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Rottweiler does not inlay and does not deaminate tablecloth.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the toupee is not pudendal.; sent10 -> int4: if the toupee is not pudendal it is etymological and is not a beak.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the toupee is etymological but it is not a kind of a beak.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__