the fact that the pick-off does not occur and the forcing cuisine does not occur hold.
sent1: the typhoon does not occur if the vaulting constitutionalism and the apprehension occurs. sent2: the gravure occurs or the cleaning happens or both. sent3: that the pick-off does not occur and the forcing cuisine does not occur is not true if the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent4: that that the pick-off occurs and the forcing cuisine does not occur hold is incorrect. sent5: if the idiopathicness and the postganglionicness occurs then the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent6: the pick-off does not occur if the fact that not the ECCM but the pick-off happens is not correct. sent7: the fact that the Sufiness occurs hold if the staggering occurs. sent8: the forcing pollster does not occur. sent9: if the Calvary occurs the purifying Poronotus occurs. sent10: the vaccination does not occur. sent11: the fact that that both the non-idiopathicness and the non-postganglionicness happens does not hold hold if the fact that the lunisolarness does not occur is right. sent12: if the cleaning happens the ECCM happens. sent13: if the radiopaqueness does not occur that the pick-off occurs but the forcing cuisine does not occur is not true. sent14: the lunisolarness does not occur. sent15: that the miffing happens is brought about by that the tessellating occurs and/or that the scourging FSB does not occur. sent16: the ECCM does not occur. sent17: the postganglionicness occurs. sent18: the fact that not the pick-off but the forcing cuisine happens is false if the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent19: the downturn occurs. sent20: that the fighting does not occur and the stream does not occur is incorrect. sent21: the fact that the pick-off does not occur but the forcing cuisine occurs is not correct. sent22: either that the gravure occurs or the non-cleaningness or both prevents the non-idiopathicness. sent23: the glandularness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cleaning happens hold.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the ECCM occurs.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the cleaningness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: either the gravure or the non-cleaningness or both happens.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the idiopathicness happens.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the idiopathicness happens and the postganglionicness occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the radiopaqueness does not occur.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the pick-off does not occur and the forcing cuisine does not occur.
sent11 & sent14 -> int8: the fact that both the non-idiopathicness and the non-postganglionicness happens is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pick-off does not occur and the forcing cuisine does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the typhoon does not occur if the vaulting constitutionalism and the apprehension occurs. sent2: the gravure occurs or the cleaning happens or both. sent3: that the pick-off does not occur and the forcing cuisine does not occur is not true if the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent4: that that the pick-off occurs and the forcing cuisine does not occur hold is incorrect. sent5: if the idiopathicness and the postganglionicness occurs then the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent6: the pick-off does not occur if the fact that not the ECCM but the pick-off happens is not correct. sent7: the fact that the Sufiness occurs hold if the staggering occurs. sent8: the forcing pollster does not occur. sent9: if the Calvary occurs the purifying Poronotus occurs. sent10: the vaccination does not occur. sent11: the fact that that both the non-idiopathicness and the non-postganglionicness happens does not hold hold if the fact that the lunisolarness does not occur is right. sent12: if the cleaning happens the ECCM happens. sent13: if the radiopaqueness does not occur that the pick-off occurs but the forcing cuisine does not occur is not true. sent14: the lunisolarness does not occur. sent15: that the miffing happens is brought about by that the tessellating occurs and/or that the scourging FSB does not occur. sent16: the ECCM does not occur. sent17: the postganglionicness occurs. sent18: the fact that not the pick-off but the forcing cuisine happens is false if the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent19: the downturn occurs. sent20: that the fighting does not occur and the stream does not occur is incorrect. sent21: the fact that the pick-off does not occur but the forcing cuisine occurs is not correct. sent22: either that the gravure occurs or the non-cleaningness or both prevents the non-idiopathicness. sent23: the glandularness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cleaning happens hold.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the ECCM occurs.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the cleaningness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: either the gravure or the non-cleaningness or both happens.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the idiopathicness happens.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the idiopathicness happens and the postganglionicness occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the radiopaqueness does not occur.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__