the Celtic and the wetness happens if the reintroduction does not occur.
sent1: if the chomping IWW and the neuroplasty happens the reintroduction happens. sent2: the anatomicness does not occur and the chomping dangleberry does not occur if the retaliation happens. sent3: if that the fact that the fact that the bluff does not occur but the formulation occurs is correct is incorrect hold then the stagnating does not occur. sent4: the Celticness occurs if that the sun happens is true. sent5: if the class does not occur both the non-wetness and the non-Celticness happens. sent6: that the nagging pogge does not occur results in that both the chomping dangleberry and the sinkableness happens. sent7: the vasomotorness does not occur if the fact that not the reintroduction but the vasomotorness occurs is wrong. sent8: if that not the chomping IWW but the neuroplasty occurs is false the sunning occurs. sent9: the brush happens if the fact that the cheliferousness does not occur and the usufructuariness occurs is not right. sent10: the debacle does not occur and the tarnishing binary does not occur. sent11: the hieroglyphicness occurs. sent12: that the bluffing does not occur leads to that the adactylousness does not occur and the stagnating does not occur. sent13: the chomping lwei happens if the humaneness happens. sent14: if the chomping lwei happens the fact that the non-paradigmaticness and/or the foliation happens is wrong. sent15: that both the non-wetness and the non-Celticness happens leads to that the sunning does not occur. sent16: the retaliation occurs if the fact that the paradigmaticness does not occur or the foliation occurs or both is incorrect. sent17: if the chomping dangleberry does not occur the fact that not the bluffing but the formulation occurs is wrong. sent18: the reintroduction occurs if the chomping IWW does not occur but the neuroplasty happens. sent19: that the reintroduction does not occur but the vasomotorness occurs does not hold if the sun does not occur. sent20: the bluffing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the chomping IWW but the neuroplasty happens.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the reintroduction occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the reintroduction does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the chomping IWW but the neuroplasty occurs is not right.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the sun occurs.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the Celticness occurs.; sent12 & sent20 -> int6: the adactylousness does not occur and the stagnating does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the adactylousness does not occur.;
the vasomotorness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Celtic and the wetness happens if the reintroduction does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chomping IWW and the neuroplasty happens the reintroduction happens. sent2: the anatomicness does not occur and the chomping dangleberry does not occur if the retaliation happens. sent3: if that the fact that the fact that the bluff does not occur but the formulation occurs is correct is incorrect hold then the stagnating does not occur. sent4: the Celticness occurs if that the sun happens is true. sent5: if the class does not occur both the non-wetness and the non-Celticness happens. sent6: that the nagging pogge does not occur results in that both the chomping dangleberry and the sinkableness happens. sent7: the vasomotorness does not occur if the fact that not the reintroduction but the vasomotorness occurs is wrong. sent8: if that not the chomping IWW but the neuroplasty occurs is false the sunning occurs. sent9: the brush happens if the fact that the cheliferousness does not occur and the usufructuariness occurs is not right. sent10: the debacle does not occur and the tarnishing binary does not occur. sent11: the hieroglyphicness occurs. sent12: that the bluffing does not occur leads to that the adactylousness does not occur and the stagnating does not occur. sent13: the chomping lwei happens if the humaneness happens. sent14: if the chomping lwei happens the fact that the non-paradigmaticness and/or the foliation happens is wrong. sent15: that both the non-wetness and the non-Celticness happens leads to that the sunning does not occur. sent16: the retaliation occurs if the fact that the paradigmaticness does not occur or the foliation occurs or both is incorrect. sent17: if the chomping dangleberry does not occur the fact that not the bluffing but the formulation occurs is wrong. sent18: the reintroduction occurs if the chomping IWW does not occur but the neuroplasty happens. sent19: that the reintroduction does not occur but the vasomotorness occurs does not hold if the sun does not occur. sent20: the bluffing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the chomping IWW but the neuroplasty happens.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the reintroduction occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the reintroduction does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the chomping IWW but the neuroplasty occurs is not right.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the sun occurs.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the Celticness occurs.; sent12 & sent20 -> int6: the adactylousness does not occur and the stagnating does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the adactylousness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__