there is something such that if it is not postmenopausal that it does not clap mesosphere and it is a loofah is not right.
sent1: the fact that something is not a Woden but it is time-release is wrong if it does not julienne archeologist. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not julienne C-section it is not a Erlang but a conviviality. sent3: the fact that the burden does clap mesosphere and it is a loofah is wrong if it is not postmenopausal. sent4: if the burden is not postmenopausal that it does not clap mesosphere and it is a loofah is not true.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
that there exists something such that if it does not julienne archeologist the fact that it is not a Woden and it is time-release is wrong is true.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the Comrade is both not a Woden and time-release hold is not true if that it does not julienne archeologist hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not postmenopausal that it does not clap mesosphere and it is a loofah is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a Woden but it is time-release is wrong if it does not julienne archeologist. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not julienne C-section it is not a Erlang but a conviviality. sent3: the fact that the burden does clap mesosphere and it is a loofah is wrong if it is not postmenopausal. sent4: if the burden is not postmenopausal that it does not clap mesosphere and it is a loofah is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__