the Cabernet is not a layoff.
sent1: something is a firm. sent2: the fact that the Cabernet is not early but it is collarless is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a firm. sent3: that the fact that the airbrake is not collarless and not tellurian is incorrect is correct. sent4: the fact that the Cabernet is early and not collarless is incorrect. sent5: that the Cabernet is not a kind of a layoff and it is not collarless does not hold if there is something such that it is early. sent6: the fact that the Cabernet is not a whiteout and is not a Sheridan is not correct. sent7: the fact that the Cabernet is a kind of non-early thing that is not non-collarless is false. sent8: if there exists something such that it is collarless then that the Cabernet is not a layoff and is not early is wrong. sent9: the catabolism is not a kind of a loot if that it is not a kind of a layoff and it is not costive is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the Cabernet is not early and it is not collarless is not right it is not a layoff. sent11: the fact that the Cabernet is early thing that is non-collarless does not hold if the fact that there exists something such that it is a firm is true. sent12: if the fact that the Cabernet is non-collarless thing that is not appealable does not hold it is not a kind of an anonymity. sent13: the fact that the Cabernet is non-early thing that is not collarless is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a firm. sent14: if something is collarless then the fact that the Cabernet is a kind of non-early thing that is not a layoff is wrong. sent15: something that is a kind of a firm is a layoff. sent16: the aye-aye is not a kind of a firm if that it is both not a radioscopy and not a lusterware is incorrect. sent17: that the longbowman does not oppose wind is not incorrect if that it is non-articular but not a firm is incorrect.
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: that the Cabernet is not early and not collarless is wrong.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Cabernet is a layoff.
sent15 -> int2: the Cabernet is a layoff if it is a kind of a firm.;
$hypothesis$ = the Cabernet is not a layoff. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a firm. sent2: the fact that the Cabernet is not early but it is collarless is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a firm. sent3: that the fact that the airbrake is not collarless and not tellurian is incorrect is correct. sent4: the fact that the Cabernet is early and not collarless is incorrect. sent5: that the Cabernet is not a kind of a layoff and it is not collarless does not hold if there is something such that it is early. sent6: the fact that the Cabernet is not a whiteout and is not a Sheridan is not correct. sent7: the fact that the Cabernet is a kind of non-early thing that is not non-collarless is false. sent8: if there exists something such that it is collarless then that the Cabernet is not a layoff and is not early is wrong. sent9: the catabolism is not a kind of a loot if that it is not a kind of a layoff and it is not costive is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the Cabernet is not early and it is not collarless is not right it is not a layoff. sent11: the fact that the Cabernet is early thing that is non-collarless does not hold if the fact that there exists something such that it is a firm is true. sent12: if the fact that the Cabernet is non-collarless thing that is not appealable does not hold it is not a kind of an anonymity. sent13: the fact that the Cabernet is non-early thing that is not collarless is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a firm. sent14: if something is collarless then the fact that the Cabernet is a kind of non-early thing that is not a layoff is wrong. sent15: something that is a kind of a firm is a layoff. sent16: the aye-aye is not a kind of a firm if that it is both not a radioscopy and not a lusterware is incorrect. sent17: that the longbowman does not oppose wind is not incorrect if that it is non-articular but not a firm is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: that the Cabernet is not early and not collarless is wrong.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__