there is something such that if it is not scrotal it is both not psychoactive and not unconventional.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is scrotal then it is not psychoactive and is conventional. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not madden asceticism then it is incommensurate and strikes affinity. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-scrotal then it is conventional. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not madden hydantoin it does madden ribbonfish. sent5: if something does not puzzle it is not a Zimbabwean and it is psychoactive. sent6: the sharkskin is not psychoactive and is not unconventional if it is non-scrotal. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not scrotal it is not psychoactive.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sharkskin is not Zimbabwean but it is psychoactive hold if it does not puzzle.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not scrotal it is both not psychoactive and not unconventional. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is scrotal then it is not psychoactive and is conventional. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not madden asceticism then it is incommensurate and strikes affinity. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-scrotal then it is conventional. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not madden hydantoin it does madden ribbonfish. sent5: if something does not puzzle it is not a Zimbabwean and it is psychoactive. sent6: the sharkskin is not psychoactive and is not unconventional if it is non-scrotal. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not scrotal it is not psychoactive. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__