the interoceptor is not an iva but it is a kind of a buttocks.
sent1: something is not matriarchal if it is sentient and not an iva. sent2: if the outsider is sentient the stentor is not a cockney. sent3: something is a onager. sent4: if the outsider does not splurge then the fact that the kremlin is not an efferent but it splurge is wrong. sent5: that the kremlin is efferent and it is a splurge is false. sent6: that the fact that the outsider is both sentient and Olympic hold does not hold if the kremlin is not a splurge. sent7: the interoceptor is not careful. sent8: the interoceptor is Olympic. sent9: the fact that the stentor is not a cockney if the fact that the outsider is both careful and not sentient is not right is true. sent10: the kremlin is not Olympic if it is efferent. sent11: that the interoceptor is both not an iva and a buttocks is not right if the kremlin is not Olympic. sent12: the fact that the outsider is careful and is sentient is incorrect. sent13: the outsider is not sentient. sent14: something is not a cockney and is Olympic if it is not non-efferent. sent15: the stentor is matriarchal. sent16: if the fact that something is not efferent but it is a splurge does not hold it is not Olympic. sent17: if something that is careful is not sentient it is not a splurge. sent18: the stentor is a kind of matriarchal thing that is cockney. sent19: if something is not a cockney but it is Olympic it is not a kind of an iva. sent20: if the outsider is careful and it is not insentient then it does not splurge.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the outsider is careful and is not sentient is not true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the stentor is not a cockney.; sent18 -> int2: the stentor is a cockney.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the outsider is careful and not sentient.; sent17 -> int5: if the outsider is careful but it is not sentient then it does not splurge.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the outsider is not a splurge.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the kremlin is a kind of non-efferent a splurge is false.; sent16 -> int8: the kremlin is not Olympic if that it is both not efferent and a splurge is wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the kremlin is not Olympic.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the interoceptor is not an iva but it is a buttocks.
sent19 -> int10: if the interoceptor is not a cockney but it is Olympic then it is not an iva.; sent14 -> int11: if the interoceptor is an efferent it is non-cockney thing that is Olympic.;
$hypothesis$ = the interoceptor is not an iva but it is a kind of a buttocks. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not matriarchal if it is sentient and not an iva. sent2: if the outsider is sentient the stentor is not a cockney. sent3: something is a onager. sent4: if the outsider does not splurge then the fact that the kremlin is not an efferent but it splurge is wrong. sent5: that the kremlin is efferent and it is a splurge is false. sent6: that the fact that the outsider is both sentient and Olympic hold does not hold if the kremlin is not a splurge. sent7: the interoceptor is not careful. sent8: the interoceptor is Olympic. sent9: the fact that the stentor is not a cockney if the fact that the outsider is both careful and not sentient is not right is true. sent10: the kremlin is not Olympic if it is efferent. sent11: that the interoceptor is both not an iva and a buttocks is not right if the kremlin is not Olympic. sent12: the fact that the outsider is careful and is sentient is incorrect. sent13: the outsider is not sentient. sent14: something is not a cockney and is Olympic if it is not non-efferent. sent15: the stentor is matriarchal. sent16: if the fact that something is not efferent but it is a splurge does not hold it is not Olympic. sent17: if something that is careful is not sentient it is not a splurge. sent18: the stentor is a kind of matriarchal thing that is cockney. sent19: if something is not a cockney but it is Olympic it is not a kind of an iva. sent20: if the outsider is careful and it is not insentient then it does not splurge. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the outsider is careful and is not sentient is not true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the stentor is not a cockney.; sent18 -> int2: the stentor is a cockney.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the outsider is careful and not sentient.; sent17 -> int5: if the outsider is careful but it is not sentient then it does not splurge.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the outsider is not a splurge.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the kremlin is a kind of non-efferent a splurge is false.; sent16 -> int8: the kremlin is not Olympic if that it is both not efferent and a splurge is wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the kremlin is not Olympic.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__