the fact that there is something such that if it does not coach thurifer then it is a kind of a learner and is not a oxyacetylene is not true.
sent1: the stub does not corkscrew refractometer if it is not a kind of an absorbent and it is a shot. sent2: if the fact that the phylloquinone does coach thurifer and is branchless is not incorrect it is not a oxyacetylene. sent3: that the stub does smell stub and is not resolute does not hold. sent4: the fact that the phylloquinone smells stub and it is a oxyacetylene does not hold. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it muzzles hold then the draft is branchless. sent6: that the stub is a kind of offshore thing that is irresolute is false. sent7: there is something such that if it does not coach thurifer then it is not a oxyacetylene. sent8: the phylloquinone is a learner if there exists something such that that it does smell stub and it is not resolute is wrong. sent9: if the phylloquinone does coach thurifer it is a learner and it is not a kind of a oxyacetylene. sent10: the chaffinch is offshore. sent11: if the chaffinch is offshore then the draft muzzles. sent12: the phylloquinone does muzzle if the draft is a kind of a learner. sent13: the bedpan is not a oxyacetylene if that the chaffinch is not offshore and it is not a oxyacetylene is wrong. sent14: there is something such that if it does coach thurifer it is a learner and it is not a kind of a oxyacetylene. sent15: if something is a kind of a heroism then it is branchless. sent16: if the draft does muzzle the fact that the phylloquinone is a kind of a heroism is not incorrect. sent17: if there is something such that it does not smell stub the phylloquinone is a learner. sent18: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not coach thurifer then it is a learner and it is a kind of a oxyacetylene is not wrong. sent19: the phylloquinone is not a oxyacetylene if it does not coach thurifer and it is branchless.
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the draft is a muzzle.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the phylloquinone is a kind of a heroism.; sent15 -> int3: the phylloquinone is branchless if it is a kind of a heroism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the phylloquinone is branchless.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phylloquinone does not coach thurifer.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the phylloquinone does not coach thurifer and is branchless.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the phylloquinone is not a oxyacetylene.; sent3 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it smells stub and is irresolute is not right.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the phylloquinone is a learner.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the phylloquinone is a learner but it is not a kind of a oxyacetylene.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: if the phylloquinone does not coach thurifer then it is a learner and is not a oxyacetylene.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the bedpan is not a kind of a oxyacetylene.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not coach thurifer then it is a kind of a learner and is not a oxyacetylene is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the stub does not corkscrew refractometer if it is not a kind of an absorbent and it is a shot. sent2: if the fact that the phylloquinone does coach thurifer and is branchless is not incorrect it is not a oxyacetylene. sent3: that the stub does smell stub and is not resolute does not hold. sent4: the fact that the phylloquinone smells stub and it is a oxyacetylene does not hold. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it muzzles hold then the draft is branchless. sent6: that the stub is a kind of offshore thing that is irresolute is false. sent7: there is something such that if it does not coach thurifer then it is not a oxyacetylene. sent8: the phylloquinone is a learner if there exists something such that that it does smell stub and it is not resolute is wrong. sent9: if the phylloquinone does coach thurifer it is a learner and it is not a kind of a oxyacetylene. sent10: the chaffinch is offshore. sent11: if the chaffinch is offshore then the draft muzzles. sent12: the phylloquinone does muzzle if the draft is a kind of a learner. sent13: the bedpan is not a oxyacetylene if that the chaffinch is not offshore and it is not a oxyacetylene is wrong. sent14: there is something such that if it does coach thurifer it is a learner and it is not a kind of a oxyacetylene. sent15: if something is a kind of a heroism then it is branchless. sent16: if the draft does muzzle the fact that the phylloquinone is a kind of a heroism is not incorrect. sent17: if there is something such that it does not smell stub the phylloquinone is a learner. sent18: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not coach thurifer then it is a learner and it is a kind of a oxyacetylene is not wrong. sent19: the phylloquinone is not a oxyacetylene if it does not coach thurifer and it is branchless. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the draft is a muzzle.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the phylloquinone is a kind of a heroism.; sent15 -> int3: the phylloquinone is branchless if it is a kind of a heroism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the phylloquinone is branchless.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phylloquinone does not coach thurifer.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the phylloquinone does not coach thurifer and is branchless.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the phylloquinone is not a oxyacetylene.; sent3 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it smells stub and is irresolute is not right.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the phylloquinone is a learner.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the phylloquinone is a learner but it is not a kind of a oxyacetylene.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: if the phylloquinone does not coach thurifer then it is a learner and is not a oxyacetylene.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__