the paraldehyde does not keratinize upbraider.
sent1: the rhizoid keratinizes epilogue. sent2: that the paraldehyde is a preteen but it is not apiarian is not right if the lychgate is not a preteen. sent3: something is a convention but it is not a preteen if that it does keratinize bitterness is correct. sent4: the lychgate is a kind of a convention. sent5: if something does not shush harebell and it is not a kind of a self-disciplined it is not apiarian. sent6: if that something is a preteen but it is not apiarian is not true it does keratinize upbraider. sent7: the crap is calyptrate but it does not shush harebell if it is not a washout. sent8: the paraldehyde keratinizes upbraider if the fact that it is not non-apiarian hold. sent9: if the crap is calyptrate but it does not shush harebell then the fact that the ingrowth does not shush harebell is not incorrect. sent10: the lychgate does keratinize bitterness if the ingrowth does shush harebell. sent11: the ingrowth keratinizes bitterness and/or it does shush harebell. sent12: there exists something such that it is a kind of a subscription. sent13: if that the ingrowth does not keratinize upbraider and does not keratinize bitterness does not hold the paraldehyde does not keratinize upbraider. sent14: if the ingrowth keratinizes bitterness the lychgate keratinizes bitterness.
sent3 -> int1: if the lychgate keratinizes bitterness it is a convention that is not a preteen.; sent11 & sent14 & sent10 -> int2: the lychgate keratinizes bitterness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lychgate is a convention but it is not a kind of a preteen.; int3 -> int4: the lychgate is not a preteen.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the paraldehyde is a preteen and not apiarian does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: if that the paraldehyde is a preteen but not apiarian is not true it does keratinize upbraider.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the paraldehyde does not keratinize upbraider.
sent5 -> int7: if the ingrowth does not shush harebell and it is not a kind of a self-disciplined then it is not apiarian.; sent1 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it does keratinize epilogue is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the paraldehyde does not keratinize upbraider. ; $context$ = sent1: the rhizoid keratinizes epilogue. sent2: that the paraldehyde is a preteen but it is not apiarian is not right if the lychgate is not a preteen. sent3: something is a convention but it is not a preteen if that it does keratinize bitterness is correct. sent4: the lychgate is a kind of a convention. sent5: if something does not shush harebell and it is not a kind of a self-disciplined it is not apiarian. sent6: if that something is a preteen but it is not apiarian is not true it does keratinize upbraider. sent7: the crap is calyptrate but it does not shush harebell if it is not a washout. sent8: the paraldehyde keratinizes upbraider if the fact that it is not non-apiarian hold. sent9: if the crap is calyptrate but it does not shush harebell then the fact that the ingrowth does not shush harebell is not incorrect. sent10: the lychgate does keratinize bitterness if the ingrowth does shush harebell. sent11: the ingrowth keratinizes bitterness and/or it does shush harebell. sent12: there exists something such that it is a kind of a subscription. sent13: if that the ingrowth does not keratinize upbraider and does not keratinize bitterness does not hold the paraldehyde does not keratinize upbraider. sent14: if the ingrowth keratinizes bitterness the lychgate keratinizes bitterness. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the lychgate keratinizes bitterness it is a convention that is not a preteen.; sent11 & sent14 & sent10 -> int2: the lychgate keratinizes bitterness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lychgate is a convention but it is not a kind of a preteen.; int3 -> int4: the lychgate is not a preteen.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the paraldehyde is a preteen and not apiarian does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: if that the paraldehyde is a preteen but not apiarian is not true it does keratinize upbraider.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__