that the clamoring pia does not occur yields that the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur.
sent1: that the mutafacientness happens leads to that the ostracism does not occur and the monopolizing chimera does not occur. sent2: both the pickup and the non-electromagneticness occurs. sent3: the mesonicness does not occur if that both the salivating and the monopolizing slash occurs is not true. sent4: if the fact that the pickup and the non-electromagneticness happens is incorrect the meteor occurs. sent5: that the clamoring pia does not occur leads to the non-electromagneticness. sent6: the electromagneticness does not occur. sent7: that the analogy does not occur is prevented by the meteor. sent8: the fact that the meteor happens hold if that the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur is not true. sent9: the meteor occurs if the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur. sent10: if the raking occurs then not the meteor but the fandango happens. sent11: the clamoring pia occurs if the analogy happens. sent12: the non-mesonicness causes that the cathedral happens and the mutafacientness occurs. sent13: if the meteor does not occur the fact that the analogy but not the clamoring pia occurs is incorrect. sent14: that not the pickup but the electromagneticness occurs is not true. sent15: if the analogy does not occur then the baseball does not occur and the possession does not occur. sent16: the fact that not the tribulating dried but the sunray occurs is not true if the fact that the entomologicalness does not occur is correct. sent17: that the raking happens is not false if that the tribulating dried does not occur but the sunray happens is wrong. sent18: if the electromagneticness occurs then the meteor happens. sent19: that the pickup happens and the electromagneticness does not occur is caused by that the clamoring pia does not occur. sent20: the swiz and the non-entomologicalness happens if the ostracism does not occur. sent21: the pickup happens. sent22: the fact that the acquittal does not occur and the fandango does not occur is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that that the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur hold is false.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the meteor happens.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the analogy occurs.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the clamoring pia occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clamoring pia does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the baseball does not occur and the possession does not occur is correct.
$hypothesis$ = that the clamoring pia does not occur yields that the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mutafacientness happens leads to that the ostracism does not occur and the monopolizing chimera does not occur. sent2: both the pickup and the non-electromagneticness occurs. sent3: the mesonicness does not occur if that both the salivating and the monopolizing slash occurs is not true. sent4: if the fact that the pickup and the non-electromagneticness happens is incorrect the meteor occurs. sent5: that the clamoring pia does not occur leads to the non-electromagneticness. sent6: the electromagneticness does not occur. sent7: that the analogy does not occur is prevented by the meteor. sent8: the fact that the meteor happens hold if that the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur is not true. sent9: the meteor occurs if the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur. sent10: if the raking occurs then not the meteor but the fandango happens. sent11: the clamoring pia occurs if the analogy happens. sent12: the non-mesonicness causes that the cathedral happens and the mutafacientness occurs. sent13: if the meteor does not occur the fact that the analogy but not the clamoring pia occurs is incorrect. sent14: that not the pickup but the electromagneticness occurs is not true. sent15: if the analogy does not occur then the baseball does not occur and the possession does not occur. sent16: the fact that not the tribulating dried but the sunray occurs is not true if the fact that the entomologicalness does not occur is correct. sent17: that the raking happens is not false if that the tribulating dried does not occur but the sunray happens is wrong. sent18: if the electromagneticness occurs then the meteor happens. sent19: that the pickup happens and the electromagneticness does not occur is caused by that the clamoring pia does not occur. sent20: the swiz and the non-entomologicalness happens if the ostracism does not occur. sent21: the pickup happens. sent22: the fact that the acquittal does not occur and the fandango does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that that the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur hold is false.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the meteor happens.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the analogy occurs.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the clamoring pia occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clamoring pia does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the pickup does not occur and the electromagneticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__