the pied-a-terre is a kind of a credenza.
sent1: The fact that the sandbag does clinch Tolectin is correct. sent2: if there exists something such that either it is not a kind of a nurse or it is not a kind of a courser or both then the vaquero is Eurocentric. sent3: the pied-a-terre does pigeonhole if the vaquero is Eurocentric. sent4: that the Tolectin is not a Delphinapterus is true. sent5: the fact that the Tolectin does clinch sandbag is correct. sent6: if that the Tolectin is a recurrence is not wrong then the fact that it clinches sandbag and is not a Delphinapterus does not hold. sent7: if something is not a recurrence it is not a kind of a nurse and/or it is not a courser.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tolectin is a kind of a recurrence.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the Tolectin does clinch sandbag but it is not a Delphinapterus does not hold.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the Tolectin does clinch sandbag but it is not a Delphinapterus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the Tolectin is not a recurrence is true.; sent7 -> int5: if that the Tolectin is a kind of a recurrence does not hold then it does not nurse and/or is not a courser.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Tolectin is not a nurse or it is not a courser or both.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nurse or it is not a courser or both hold.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the vaquero is Eurocentric.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the pied-a-terre is a pigeonhole.;
$hypothesis$ = the pied-a-terre is a kind of a credenza. ; $context$ = sent1: The fact that the sandbag does clinch Tolectin is correct. sent2: if there exists something such that either it is not a kind of a nurse or it is not a kind of a courser or both then the vaquero is Eurocentric. sent3: the pied-a-terre does pigeonhole if the vaquero is Eurocentric. sent4: that the Tolectin is not a Delphinapterus is true. sent5: the fact that the Tolectin does clinch sandbag is correct. sent6: if that the Tolectin is a recurrence is not wrong then the fact that it clinches sandbag and is not a Delphinapterus does not hold. sent7: if something is not a recurrence it is not a kind of a nurse and/or it is not a courser. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tolectin is a kind of a recurrence.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the Tolectin does clinch sandbag but it is not a Delphinapterus does not hold.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the Tolectin does clinch sandbag but it is not a Delphinapterus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the Tolectin is not a recurrence is true.; sent7 -> int5: if that the Tolectin is a kind of a recurrence does not hold then it does not nurse and/or is not a courser.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Tolectin is not a nurse or it is not a courser or both.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nurse or it is not a courser or both hold.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the vaquero is Eurocentric.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the pied-a-terre is a pigeonhole.; __UNKNOWN__