the slugger does truck Delichon and is a organophosphate.
sent1: if something is a Darwinism then either it is a kind of a organophosphate or it is non-retrograde or both. sent2: if the slugger is not caruncular then the fact that it is a Darwinism and it is a kind of a organophosphate does not hold. sent3: that the chaja is not non-retrograde but it is not caruncular is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the slugger is both a Darwinism and retrograde is wrong. sent5: there is nothing such that it is not linear and is not chalybeate. sent6: the fact that something trucks Katharevusa and is a rake-off is wrong if it is not a kind of a pasha. sent7: the beaugregory is not a Darwinism. sent8: that something trucks Delichon and is a organophosphate is not right if that it is not a Darwinism is not false. sent9: the fact that the chaja is caruncular and it trucks Delichon is not correct. sent10: the slugger is not a Darwinism if the chaja is retrograde. sent11: if that the fact that the chaja is non-retrograde thing that is not caruncular does not hold is true the slugger is not a Darwinism. sent12: that the chaja does truck Delichon and is a kind of a organophosphate is false if it is not retrograde. sent13: there is nothing such that it is retrograde and it is not caruncular. sent14: there exists nothing that is not retrograde and not caruncular.
sent14 -> int1: that the chaja does not retrograde and it is not caruncular is not correct.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the slugger is not a Darwinism.; sent8 -> int3: that the slugger does truck Delichon and it is a organophosphate is wrong if it is not a Darwinism.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the slugger is not retrograde.
sent1 -> int4: if that the balsamroot is a kind of a Darwinism is not wrong it is a organophosphate and/or it is not retrograde.;
$hypothesis$ = the slugger does truck Delichon and is a organophosphate. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Darwinism then either it is a kind of a organophosphate or it is non-retrograde or both. sent2: if the slugger is not caruncular then the fact that it is a Darwinism and it is a kind of a organophosphate does not hold. sent3: that the chaja is not non-retrograde but it is not caruncular is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the slugger is both a Darwinism and retrograde is wrong. sent5: there is nothing such that it is not linear and is not chalybeate. sent6: the fact that something trucks Katharevusa and is a rake-off is wrong if it is not a kind of a pasha. sent7: the beaugregory is not a Darwinism. sent8: that something trucks Delichon and is a organophosphate is not right if that it is not a Darwinism is not false. sent9: the fact that the chaja is caruncular and it trucks Delichon is not correct. sent10: the slugger is not a Darwinism if the chaja is retrograde. sent11: if that the fact that the chaja is non-retrograde thing that is not caruncular does not hold is true the slugger is not a Darwinism. sent12: that the chaja does truck Delichon and is a kind of a organophosphate is false if it is not retrograde. sent13: there is nothing such that it is retrograde and it is not caruncular. sent14: there exists nothing that is not retrograde and not caruncular. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: that the chaja does not retrograde and it is not caruncular is not correct.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the slugger is not a Darwinism.; sent8 -> int3: that the slugger does truck Delichon and it is a organophosphate is wrong if it is not a Darwinism.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__