the laicizing does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the smartness does not occur is incorrect. sent2: that if the branchiateness does not occur and/or the disenfranchisement does not occur the laicizing occurs hold. sent3: if both the outstaring Suva and the branchiateness occurs then the shedding does not occur. sent4: if the accelerating but not the outstaring Suva happens then the laicizing does not occur. sent5: the fibrillation is triggered by that the backing does not occur and/or the non-hemiparasiticness. sent6: the rounded occurs. sent7: the conscription occurs and the shedding happens if the countermining does not occur. sent8: the surmising Kurd does not occur. sent9: that the conscription occurs is caused by that the countermine does not occur. sent10: either the branchiateness does not occur or the disenfranchisement happens or both. sent11: the countermining does not occur. sent12: the crow happens. sent13: that the plumping does not occur is not false. sent14: the branchiateness occurs and/or the disenfranchisement does not occur. sent15: the outstaring vulcanite does not occur. sent16: the outstaring Suva and the accelerating occurs. sent17: the fact that the restraining whorlywort occurs hold. sent18: the non-coeliacness is triggered by that the anabolicness and the bocce occurs. sent19: the accelerating happens. sent20: the accelerating occurs if the fact that the shedding occurs or the disenfranchisement does not occur or both is not true. sent21: the conscription occurs.
sent16 -> int1: the outstaring Suva occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the branchiateness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the outstaring Suva and the branchiateness occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the shedding does not occur.; sent7 & sent11 -> int4: the conscription and the shedding occurs.; int4 -> int5: the shedding happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the branchiateness does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the branchiateness does not occur or the disenfranchisement does not occur or both.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the laicizing does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the laicizing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the smartness does not occur is incorrect. sent2: that if the branchiateness does not occur and/or the disenfranchisement does not occur the laicizing occurs hold. sent3: if both the outstaring Suva and the branchiateness occurs then the shedding does not occur. sent4: if the accelerating but not the outstaring Suva happens then the laicizing does not occur. sent5: the fibrillation is triggered by that the backing does not occur and/or the non-hemiparasiticness. sent6: the rounded occurs. sent7: the conscription occurs and the shedding happens if the countermining does not occur. sent8: the surmising Kurd does not occur. sent9: that the conscription occurs is caused by that the countermine does not occur. sent10: either the branchiateness does not occur or the disenfranchisement happens or both. sent11: the countermining does not occur. sent12: the crow happens. sent13: that the plumping does not occur is not false. sent14: the branchiateness occurs and/or the disenfranchisement does not occur. sent15: the outstaring vulcanite does not occur. sent16: the outstaring Suva and the accelerating occurs. sent17: the fact that the restraining whorlywort occurs hold. sent18: the non-coeliacness is triggered by that the anabolicness and the bocce occurs. sent19: the accelerating happens. sent20: the accelerating occurs if the fact that the shedding occurs or the disenfranchisement does not occur or both is not true. sent21: the conscription occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the outstaring Suva occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the branchiateness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the outstaring Suva and the branchiateness occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the shedding does not occur.; sent7 & sent11 -> int4: the conscription and the shedding occurs.; int4 -> int5: the shedding happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the branchiateness does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the branchiateness does not occur or the disenfranchisement does not occur or both.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__