if the Nesselrode is a Arabian that the Grenadian does not qualify gamba but it is cannibalistic is not true.
sent1: the Nesselrode shreds. sent2: the Grenadian does qualify lacteal. sent3: that the Grenadian qualifies gamba and it is cannibalistic is wrong. sent4: if the kike is not a brake then the fact that it is a kind of cannibalistic thing that qualifies gamba is not correct. sent5: if the fact that either the Nesselrode is not a Arabian or it does qualify lacteal or both is incorrect the bearer does not qualify lacteal. sent6: if the Nesselrode does not qualify lacteal then the fact that the Grenadian does not qualify gamba and is cannibalistic is not true. sent7: the fact that the Nesselrode is not Arabian and/or it does qualify lacteal is false if the Grenadian does not shred.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Nesselrode is a kind of a Arabian.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: the Nesselrode is a kind of Arabian thing that is a shred.;
the bearer does not qualify lacteal.
$hypothesis$ = if the Nesselrode is a Arabian that the Grenadian does not qualify gamba but it is cannibalistic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the Nesselrode shreds. sent2: the Grenadian does qualify lacteal. sent3: that the Grenadian qualifies gamba and it is cannibalistic is wrong. sent4: if the kike is not a brake then the fact that it is a kind of cannibalistic thing that qualifies gamba is not correct. sent5: if the fact that either the Nesselrode is not a Arabian or it does qualify lacteal or both is incorrect the bearer does not qualify lacteal. sent6: if the Nesselrode does not qualify lacteal then the fact that the Grenadian does not qualify gamba and is cannibalistic is not true. sent7: the fact that the Nesselrode is not Arabian and/or it does qualify lacteal is false if the Grenadian does not shred. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Nesselrode is a kind of a Arabian.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: the Nesselrode is a kind of Arabian thing that is a shred.; __UNKNOWN__