the Girondist does not fidget Tyrannidae and is a surf.
sent1: the Girondist is not amniotic. sent2: if the stallion looks bluethroat then the fact that the GPS is not a kind of a casement but it is a Gounod is false. sent3: the GPS does not look bluethroat. sent4: if the GPS does not look bluethroat it is not a casement. sent5: the Girondist does not look bluethroat but it surfs if it is a casement. sent6: something is not a surf if it is a Gounod and it does not look bluethroat. sent7: the fact that the Girondist does not fidget Tyrannidae and is a surf is false if the GPS does not fidget Tyrannidae. sent8: something does look bluethroat if it is not amniotic and it does fidget Tyrannidae. sent9: the bluethroat is a kind of a heckelphone and it looks visibility. sent10: the GPS is not a recruitment but amniotic if it fidgets Tyrannidae. sent11: the bluethroat is not a Atticus and is not circadian if it is not heliocentric. sent12: the GPS is a photolithography. sent13: if the fact that the GPS is a kind of a recruitment and does not fidget Tyrannidae is incorrect the Girondist is not a recruitment. sent14: the fact that the stallion is not fathomable hold if the bluethroat is not fathomable but it is a heckelphone. sent15: if the stallion is not fathomable it is a ignorantness. sent16: the bluethroat is non-heliocentric. sent17: that the Girondist is not amniotic is true if it does not fidget Tyrannidae. sent18: if the Girondist does surf then it looks bluethroat. sent19: something that is not a surf is not a casement. sent20: something is a Gounod but it does not look bluethroat if that it is a ignorantness is not wrong. sent21: the bluethroat is not fathomable. sent22: something that is not a recruitment but amniotic is a casement. sent23: if something that does not fidget Tyrannidae is a recruitment then it is a surf. sent24: the bluethroat is not fathomable if it is not a Atticus and it is not circadian. sent25: The bluethroat does not look GPS.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the GPS does fidget Tyrannidae.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the GPS is not a kind of a recruitment and is amniotic.; sent22 -> int2: if that the GPS is not a recruitment but it is amniotic is not wrong it is a kind of a casement.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the GPS is a casement.; sent4 & sent3 -> int4: the GPS is not a casement.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the GPS does not fidget Tyrannidae is true.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the Girondist does not fidget Tyrannidae and surfs.
$hypothesis$ = the Girondist does not fidget Tyrannidae and is a surf. ; $context$ = sent1: the Girondist is not amniotic. sent2: if the stallion looks bluethroat then the fact that the GPS is not a kind of a casement but it is a Gounod is false. sent3: the GPS does not look bluethroat. sent4: if the GPS does not look bluethroat it is not a casement. sent5: the Girondist does not look bluethroat but it surfs if it is a casement. sent6: something is not a surf if it is a Gounod and it does not look bluethroat. sent7: the fact that the Girondist does not fidget Tyrannidae and is a surf is false if the GPS does not fidget Tyrannidae. sent8: something does look bluethroat if it is not amniotic and it does fidget Tyrannidae. sent9: the bluethroat is a kind of a heckelphone and it looks visibility. sent10: the GPS is not a recruitment but amniotic if it fidgets Tyrannidae. sent11: the bluethroat is not a Atticus and is not circadian if it is not heliocentric. sent12: the GPS is a photolithography. sent13: if the fact that the GPS is a kind of a recruitment and does not fidget Tyrannidae is incorrect the Girondist is not a recruitment. sent14: the fact that the stallion is not fathomable hold if the bluethroat is not fathomable but it is a heckelphone. sent15: if the stallion is not fathomable it is a ignorantness. sent16: the bluethroat is non-heliocentric. sent17: that the Girondist is not amniotic is true if it does not fidget Tyrannidae. sent18: if the Girondist does surf then it looks bluethroat. sent19: something that is not a surf is not a casement. sent20: something is a Gounod but it does not look bluethroat if that it is a ignorantness is not wrong. sent21: the bluethroat is not fathomable. sent22: something that is not a recruitment but amniotic is a casement. sent23: if something that does not fidget Tyrannidae is a recruitment then it is a surf. sent24: the bluethroat is not fathomable if it is not a Atticus and it is not circadian. sent25: The bluethroat does not look GPS. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the GPS does fidget Tyrannidae.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the GPS is not a kind of a recruitment and is amniotic.; sent22 -> int2: if that the GPS is not a recruitment but it is amniotic is not wrong it is a kind of a casement.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the GPS is a casement.; sent4 & sent3 -> int4: the GPS is not a casement.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the GPS does not fidget Tyrannidae is true.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__