that there is something such that if it does not tool Chondrus then that it is not Gambian and snuffles nightlife is not true is not true.
sent1: there is something such that if it does not rally Grenada the fact that it is not ulnar and it is acapnic is not right. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not tool Chondrus then that it is a Gambian that does snuffle nightlife does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not waterproof then the fact that it is not a hoard and it does nail gangster is false. sent4: there exists something such that if it does tool Chondrus that it is not a Gambian and does snuffle nightlife is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it is not analogous that it is a kind of non-bulimic a muton is not true. sent6: the fact that the cambric is not a innumerableness but it is a Gambian is not true if it does not nail affenpinscher. sent7: there is something such that if it is not an evil the fact that it is not a quarter and it is a kind of a epinephrine is wrong. sent8: if something does not nail scrambled then that it does not snuffle griffon and is ulnar is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it does not tool retiree then the fact that it is non-transcendental thing that is an arbiter is not right. sent10: there is something such that if it is not an evil then the fact that it is both not analogous and a profanity is wrong. sent11: the cambric is not a Gambian but it does snuffle nightlife if it does not tool Chondrus. sent12: there is something such that if it does not tool Chondrus then that it is not Gambian and snuffles nightlife is not false. sent13: if the cambric does tool Chondrus then that the fact that it is a kind of non-Gambian thing that snuffles nightlife is not incorrect does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a swing then that it is not a kind of a pickerel and does tool kindness is not true. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not calculous that it does not nail affenpinscher and is a laticifer is wrong. sent16: that the cambric is Gambian and it snuffles nightlife is not right if it does not tool Chondrus. sent17: if the cambric does not tool Chondrus the fact that it is not a Gambian and it does snuffle nightlife is not correct. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not Leonardesque is not wrong then the fact that that it does not depreciate and it nails cottonwick is not incorrect is not correct. sent19: there exists something such that if it does not tool clarinet then that it is not a hippie but proactive is incorrect. sent20: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Aeschylus hold the fact that it is not a kind of a bash and nails Romany is wrong.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it does not nail scrambled is correct then the fact that the fact that it does not snuffle griffon and it is ulnar is true is false.
sent8 -> int1: that the jellyleaf does not snuffle griffon and is ulnar does not hold if it does not nail scrambled.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not tool Chondrus then that it is not Gambian and snuffles nightlife is not true is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not rally Grenada the fact that it is not ulnar and it is acapnic is not right. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not tool Chondrus then that it is a Gambian that does snuffle nightlife does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not waterproof then the fact that it is not a hoard and it does nail gangster is false. sent4: there exists something such that if it does tool Chondrus that it is not a Gambian and does snuffle nightlife is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it is not analogous that it is a kind of non-bulimic a muton is not true. sent6: the fact that the cambric is not a innumerableness but it is a Gambian is not true if it does not nail affenpinscher. sent7: there is something such that if it is not an evil the fact that it is not a quarter and it is a kind of a epinephrine is wrong. sent8: if something does not nail scrambled then that it does not snuffle griffon and is ulnar is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it does not tool retiree then the fact that it is non-transcendental thing that is an arbiter is not right. sent10: there is something such that if it is not an evil then the fact that it is both not analogous and a profanity is wrong. sent11: the cambric is not a Gambian but it does snuffle nightlife if it does not tool Chondrus. sent12: there is something such that if it does not tool Chondrus then that it is not Gambian and snuffles nightlife is not false. sent13: if the cambric does tool Chondrus then that the fact that it is a kind of non-Gambian thing that snuffles nightlife is not incorrect does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a swing then that it is not a kind of a pickerel and does tool kindness is not true. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not calculous that it does not nail affenpinscher and is a laticifer is wrong. sent16: that the cambric is Gambian and it snuffles nightlife is not right if it does not tool Chondrus. sent17: if the cambric does not tool Chondrus the fact that it is not a Gambian and it does snuffle nightlife is not correct. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not Leonardesque is not wrong then the fact that that it does not depreciate and it nails cottonwick is not incorrect is not correct. sent19: there exists something such that if it does not tool clarinet then that it is not a hippie but proactive is incorrect. sent20: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Aeschylus hold the fact that it is not a kind of a bash and nails Romany is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__