the cufflink does liquidize and it is a Creation.
sent1: if something is upland that it is not a Musca and it is not directing is false. sent2: the cufflink does not liquidize if it misconstrues lasher and it is a kind of a marseille. sent3: if the convent does not liquidize then the cufflink liquidize and is a Creation. sent4: the cufflink does misconstrue Cuzco and does unbar Cabomba. sent5: that the cufflink does liquidize and is not insectivorous is not correct. sent6: something is not a marseille if it is both insectivorous and wetting. sent7: if the Verdicchio liquidizes then the cufflink is not a marseille. sent8: the Verdicchio is both insectivorous and wetting if it is not a kind of a hammered. sent9: the convent does not unbar Cabomba if the fact that the Verdicchio does not misconstrue lasher and does not unbar affair is not right. sent10: if the dehiscence is archegonial and it deduces Jackson then it is not a brakeman. sent11: if something is not a kind of a marseille then it unbars bunch. sent12: if the convent does not unbar bunch the fact that the cufflink liquidizes and is a Creation is incorrect. sent13: the Verdicchio is not a hammered. sent14: that something does not misconstrue lasher and does not unbar affair is wrong if it does unbar bunch. sent15: that something does not liquidize if it does not unbar Cabomba is not false.
sent6 -> int1: if the Verdicchio is both insectivorous and wetting then it is not a marseille.; sent8 & sent13 -> int2: the Verdicchio is insectivorous and it wets.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Verdicchio is not a marseille hold.; sent11 -> int4: the Verdicchio unbars bunch if it is not a kind of a marseille.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the Verdicchio unbars bunch is not incorrect.; sent14 -> int6: that the Verdicchio does not misconstrue lasher and it does not unbar affair is not right if it unbars bunch.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the Verdicchio does not misconstrue lasher and does not unbar affair is false.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the convent does not unbar Cabomba is not incorrect.; sent15 -> int9: if the convent does not unbar Cabomba it does not liquidize.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the convent does not liquidize.; int10 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cufflink does liquidize and is a Creation is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the cufflink does liquidize and it is a Creation. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is upland that it is not a Musca and it is not directing is false. sent2: the cufflink does not liquidize if it misconstrues lasher and it is a kind of a marseille. sent3: if the convent does not liquidize then the cufflink liquidize and is a Creation. sent4: the cufflink does misconstrue Cuzco and does unbar Cabomba. sent5: that the cufflink does liquidize and is not insectivorous is not correct. sent6: something is not a marseille if it is both insectivorous and wetting. sent7: if the Verdicchio liquidizes then the cufflink is not a marseille. sent8: the Verdicchio is both insectivorous and wetting if it is not a kind of a hammered. sent9: the convent does not unbar Cabomba if the fact that the Verdicchio does not misconstrue lasher and does not unbar affair is not right. sent10: if the dehiscence is archegonial and it deduces Jackson then it is not a brakeman. sent11: if something is not a kind of a marseille then it unbars bunch. sent12: if the convent does not unbar bunch the fact that the cufflink liquidizes and is a Creation is incorrect. sent13: the Verdicchio is not a hammered. sent14: that something does not misconstrue lasher and does not unbar affair is wrong if it does unbar bunch. sent15: that something does not liquidize if it does not unbar Cabomba is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the Verdicchio is both insectivorous and wetting then it is not a marseille.; sent8 & sent13 -> int2: the Verdicchio is insectivorous and it wets.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Verdicchio is not a marseille hold.; sent11 -> int4: the Verdicchio unbars bunch if it is not a kind of a marseille.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the Verdicchio unbars bunch is not incorrect.; sent14 -> int6: that the Verdicchio does not misconstrue lasher and it does not unbar affair is not right if it unbars bunch.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the Verdicchio does not misconstrue lasher and does not unbar affair is false.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the convent does not unbar Cabomba is not incorrect.; sent15 -> int9: if the convent does not unbar Cabomba it does not liquidize.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the convent does not liquidize.; int10 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__