the out occurs.
sent1: the outness occurs if the fact that the Balzacianness does not occur hold. sent2: if the fabianness does not occur the fact that that both the regionalness and the non-Rousseauanness occurs is right is not true. sent3: if the fact that the nonparticulateness does not occur is not incorrect the fact that the blank and the conspicuousness occurs is false. sent4: the Balzacianness happens. sent5: if the fact that the contortion does not occur is correct the fact that both the mending and the throb happens is not correct. sent6: the choralness and the lysogenizing wishbone occurs. sent7: the choralness does not occur if both the Balzacianness and the fabianness happens. sent8: the regionalness happens if the Rousseauanness happens. sent9: the non-outness is caused by either that the eventuating happens or the fibrocalcificness or both. sent10: the fibrocalcificness occurs if that the regionalness and the non-Rousseauanness occurs is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fabianness occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Balzacianness occurs and the fabianness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the choralness does not occur.; sent6 -> int3: the choralness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fabianness does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the regionalness happens and the Rousseauanness does not occur is incorrect.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fibrocalcificness happens.; int7 -> int8: the eventuating occurs and/or the fibrocalcificness occurs.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the outing occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = the out occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the outness occurs if the fact that the Balzacianness does not occur hold. sent2: if the fabianness does not occur the fact that that both the regionalness and the non-Rousseauanness occurs is right is not true. sent3: if the fact that the nonparticulateness does not occur is not incorrect the fact that the blank and the conspicuousness occurs is false. sent4: the Balzacianness happens. sent5: if the fact that the contortion does not occur is correct the fact that both the mending and the throb happens is not correct. sent6: the choralness and the lysogenizing wishbone occurs. sent7: the choralness does not occur if both the Balzacianness and the fabianness happens. sent8: the regionalness happens if the Rousseauanness happens. sent9: the non-outness is caused by either that the eventuating happens or the fibrocalcificness or both. sent10: the fibrocalcificness occurs if that the regionalness and the non-Rousseauanness occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fabianness occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Balzacianness occurs and the fabianness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the choralness does not occur.; sent6 -> int3: the choralness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fabianness does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the regionalness happens and the Rousseauanness does not occur is incorrect.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fibrocalcificness happens.; int7 -> int8: the eventuating occurs and/or the fibrocalcificness occurs.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__