that if the fracturing does not occur then the severalizing culdoscopy happens and/or the comptrollership occurs is false.
sent1: the comptrollership triggers that the severalizing culdoscopy occurs but the manhandling calendar does not occur. sent2: if the fracturing does not occur that the belch and/or the squat occurs does not hold. sent3: the omnivorousness does not occur. sent4: the belch does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the belch occurs and/or the squat happens is wrong the manhandling subgenus does not occur. sent6: the manhandling subgenus causes that the manhandling ptyalism happens and the fracture does not occur. sent7: that the manhandling calendar does not occur and the saccadicness does not occur is triggered by that the manhandling subgenus does not occur. sent8: that the severalizing culdoscopy does not occur is prevented by that the manhandling calendar does not occur and the saccadicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fracture does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that that either the belch happens or the squat happens or both is not true hold.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the manhandling subgenus does not occur.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the manhandling calendar does not occur and the saccadicness does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the severalizing culdoscopy happens is not incorrect.; int4 -> int5: the severalizing culdoscopy and/or the comptrollership happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the manhandling ptyalism occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that if the fracturing does not occur then the severalizing culdoscopy happens and/or the comptrollership occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the comptrollership triggers that the severalizing culdoscopy occurs but the manhandling calendar does not occur. sent2: if the fracturing does not occur that the belch and/or the squat occurs does not hold. sent3: the omnivorousness does not occur. sent4: the belch does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the belch occurs and/or the squat happens is wrong the manhandling subgenus does not occur. sent6: the manhandling subgenus causes that the manhandling ptyalism happens and the fracture does not occur. sent7: that the manhandling calendar does not occur and the saccadicness does not occur is triggered by that the manhandling subgenus does not occur. sent8: that the severalizing culdoscopy does not occur is prevented by that the manhandling calendar does not occur and the saccadicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fracture does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that that either the belch happens or the squat happens or both is not true hold.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the manhandling subgenus does not occur.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the manhandling calendar does not occur and the saccadicness does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the severalizing culdoscopy happens is not incorrect.; int4 -> int5: the severalizing culdoscopy and/or the comptrollership happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__