that that the witnessing occurs brings about that the divaricating dibranchiate does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the voicing happens. sent2: that the divaricating dibranchiate does not occur is caused by that both the anthropolatry and the witnessing happens. sent3: the diplomaticness and the meeting happens. sent4: the anthropolatry and the custodianship occurs. sent5: the fact that the custodianship happens hold.
sent4 -> int1: the anthropolatry happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the witnessing happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the anthropolatry occurs and the witnessing occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the divaricating dibranchiate does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the witnessing occurs brings about that the divaricating dibranchiate does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the voicing happens. sent2: that the divaricating dibranchiate does not occur is caused by that both the anthropolatry and the witnessing happens. sent3: the diplomaticness and the meeting happens. sent4: the anthropolatry and the custodianship occurs. sent5: the fact that the custodianship happens hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the anthropolatry happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the witnessing happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the anthropolatry occurs and the witnessing occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the divaricating dibranchiate does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__