if the parhelicness occurs then the exodus does not occur.
sent1: the application does not occur. sent2: the figuration does not occur if the lie-in occurs. sent3: the blinding airplane does not occur and/or the staying does not occur. sent4: that the idiopathicness does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the parhelicness and the non-Mycenaeanness occurs does not hold. sent5: that the application occurs triggers that the repoting Coryphaenidae does not occur. sent6: if the non-impetiginousness or the non-machine-madeness or both occurs then the incarnating happens. sent7: the fact that the fact that not the nonwashableness but the intuitionistness happens is not incorrect is not correct. sent8: if that the box does not occur and the fastball does not occur is incorrect then the nonwashableness does not occur. sent9: the non-idiopathicness is brought about by that the parhelicness does not occur and the Mycenaeanness does not occur. sent10: the denunciation does not occur. sent11: the leaning desertification happens. sent12: the poising does not occur and the leaning yellow does not occur. sent13: either the transitioning does not occur or the idiopathicness occurs or both. sent14: that the exodus happens is prevented by that the transition does not occur or that the idiopathicness does not occur or both. sent15: that the landler does not occur and/or the non-Bohemianness prevents the non-anisogameticness. sent16: the fact that both the non-parhelicness and the Mycenaeanness occurs does not hold. sent17: the Mycenaeanness does not occur. sent18: the organicisticness does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the non-parhelicness and the non-Mycenaeanness occurs is not true the idiopathicness does not occur. sent20: the repoting instrumentation does not occur if that the fact that the parhelicness and the repoting instrumentation happens does not hold is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the parhelicness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the non-parhelicness and the non-Mycenaeanness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the parhelicness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that both the non-parhelicness and the non-Mycenaeanness happens does not hold.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: the idiopathicness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the transition does not occur and/or the idiopathicness does not occur.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the exodus does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Bohemianness does not occur and/or the repoting instrumentation does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = if the parhelicness occurs then the exodus does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the application does not occur. sent2: the figuration does not occur if the lie-in occurs. sent3: the blinding airplane does not occur and/or the staying does not occur. sent4: that the idiopathicness does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the parhelicness and the non-Mycenaeanness occurs does not hold. sent5: that the application occurs triggers that the repoting Coryphaenidae does not occur. sent6: if the non-impetiginousness or the non-machine-madeness or both occurs then the incarnating happens. sent7: the fact that the fact that not the nonwashableness but the intuitionistness happens is not incorrect is not correct. sent8: if that the box does not occur and the fastball does not occur is incorrect then the nonwashableness does not occur. sent9: the non-idiopathicness is brought about by that the parhelicness does not occur and the Mycenaeanness does not occur. sent10: the denunciation does not occur. sent11: the leaning desertification happens. sent12: the poising does not occur and the leaning yellow does not occur. sent13: either the transitioning does not occur or the idiopathicness occurs or both. sent14: that the exodus happens is prevented by that the transition does not occur or that the idiopathicness does not occur or both. sent15: that the landler does not occur and/or the non-Bohemianness prevents the non-anisogameticness. sent16: the fact that both the non-parhelicness and the Mycenaeanness occurs does not hold. sent17: the Mycenaeanness does not occur. sent18: the organicisticness does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the non-parhelicness and the non-Mycenaeanness occurs is not true the idiopathicness does not occur. sent20: the repoting instrumentation does not occur if that the fact that the parhelicness and the repoting instrumentation happens does not hold is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the parhelicness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the non-parhelicness and the non-Mycenaeanness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the parhelicness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that both the non-parhelicness and the non-Mycenaeanness happens does not hold.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: the idiopathicness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the transition does not occur and/or the idiopathicness does not occur.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the exodus does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__