the fact that that the fastness occurs and the preparation does not occur is caused by that the backstopping stool happens is wrong.
sent1: if that the archaizing does not occur and the preparation does not occur is wrong then that the backstopping stool does not occur is true. sent2: the seigneury happens. sent3: the branching does not occur and the irradiation occurs if the seigneury happens. sent4: if that the branching does not occur is true the fastness happens. sent5: that the seigneury happens leads to the irradiation. sent6: the fact that not the archaizing but the preparation occurs does not hold. sent7: the fact that the archaizing happens and the preparation does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the archaizing does not occur and the preparation does not occur does not hold.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the backstopping stool does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backstopping stool occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the archaizing does not occur and the preparation does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the preparation does not occur.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the branching does not occur and the irradiation occurs.; int5 -> int6: the branching does not occur.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the fastness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the fast happens and the preparation does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the fastness occurs and the preparation does not occur is caused by that the backstopping stool happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the archaizing does not occur and the preparation does not occur is wrong then that the backstopping stool does not occur is true. sent2: the seigneury happens. sent3: the branching does not occur and the irradiation occurs if the seigneury happens. sent4: if that the branching does not occur is true the fastness happens. sent5: that the seigneury happens leads to the irradiation. sent6: the fact that not the archaizing but the preparation occurs does not hold. sent7: the fact that the archaizing happens and the preparation does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the archaizing does not occur and the preparation does not occur does not hold.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the backstopping stool does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backstopping stool occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the archaizing does not occur and the preparation does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the preparation does not occur.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the branching does not occur and the irradiation occurs.; int5 -> int6: the branching does not occur.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the fastness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the fast happens and the preparation does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__