the fact that there exists something such that if it does not flabbergast hemstitch then it collects Casanova and is a chase is not correct.
sent1: if a non-Newtonian thing is journalistic the fact that it collects Casanova is not wrong. sent2: the hemstitch does chase. sent3: the airmailer is both non-Newtonian and journalistic if it flabbergasts hemstitch. sent4: the fact that the airmailer is a cheesemonger hold. sent5: if the airmailer does flabbergast hemstitch then it collects Casanova and is a chase. sent6: the airmailer does flabbergast shagbark. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not flabbergast hemstitch it collects Casanova. sent8: the airmailer is a kind of a cheesemonger that is a chase. sent9: something collects Casanova but it does not flabbergast hemstitch if it does launch tiered. sent10: if that the airmailer does not flabbergast hemstitch is true then it is not a kind of a Newtonian and it is journalistic. sent11: the airmailer is journalistic if it does not flabbergast hemstitch. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not flabbergast hemstitch it chases. sent13: if something chases then the risotto is a kind of a chases or it is not a cheesemonger or both. sent14: the advancer is not a FCC and does launch Armageddon. sent15: if something does collect Casanova but it does not flabbergast hemstitch then it is a accentuation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airmailer does not flabbergast hemstitch.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the airmailer is not a Newtonian but it is journalistic.; sent1 -> int2: if the airmailer is not Newtonian and is journalistic then it collects Casanova.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the airmailer does collect Casanova.; sent8 -> int4: the airmailer is a chase.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the airmailer collects Casanova and it is a chase.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the airmailer does not flabbergast hemstitch it collects Casanova and does chase.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the risotto is not Newtonian but it is a accentuation.
sent15 -> int7: the risotto is a kind of a accentuation if it collects Casanova and it does not flabbergast hemstitch.; sent9 -> int8: the fact that the airmailer collects Casanova and does not flabbergast hemstitch hold if it does launch tiered.; sent2 -> int9: something does chase.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the risotto either is a chase or is not a kind of a cheesemonger or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not flabbergast hemstitch then it collects Casanova and is a chase is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if a non-Newtonian thing is journalistic the fact that it collects Casanova is not wrong. sent2: the hemstitch does chase. sent3: the airmailer is both non-Newtonian and journalistic if it flabbergasts hemstitch. sent4: the fact that the airmailer is a cheesemonger hold. sent5: if the airmailer does flabbergast hemstitch then it collects Casanova and is a chase. sent6: the airmailer does flabbergast shagbark. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not flabbergast hemstitch it collects Casanova. sent8: the airmailer is a kind of a cheesemonger that is a chase. sent9: something collects Casanova but it does not flabbergast hemstitch if it does launch tiered. sent10: if that the airmailer does not flabbergast hemstitch is true then it is not a kind of a Newtonian and it is journalistic. sent11: the airmailer is journalistic if it does not flabbergast hemstitch. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not flabbergast hemstitch it chases. sent13: if something chases then the risotto is a kind of a chases or it is not a cheesemonger or both. sent14: the advancer is not a FCC and does launch Armageddon. sent15: if something does collect Casanova but it does not flabbergast hemstitch then it is a accentuation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airmailer does not flabbergast hemstitch.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the airmailer is not a Newtonian but it is journalistic.; sent1 -> int2: if the airmailer is not Newtonian and is journalistic then it collects Casanova.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the airmailer does collect Casanova.; sent8 -> int4: the airmailer is a chase.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the airmailer collects Casanova and it is a chase.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the airmailer does not flabbergast hemstitch it collects Casanova and does chase.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__