there exists something such that if the fact that it is a parasympathetic that is not unperceptive is false it is not a hap.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a parasympathetic but not unperceptive is false it is a hap. sent2: there is something such that if it is a parasympathetic and is perceptive it is not a hap. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a parasympathetic it is not a hap. sent4: the riser is not a hap if it is unperceptive. sent5: there exists something such that if it is unperceptive it is not a hap. sent6: that if that the riser is a kind of responsive thing that is not the Benedictine is wrong then the riser is not soluble is correct. sent7: the riser is not a hap if that it is a kind of a parasympathetic and it is not unperceptive does not hold. sent8: if the fact that something is not non-tearful but non-mealy is wrong then it is non-acroscopic. sent9: there exists something such that if that it resigns and it is not a lysosome is wrong it is not condylar. sent10: the riser is a kind of a hap if the fact that it is parasympathetic and it is not unperceptive is wrong. sent11: if the riser is a parasympathetic but it is not unperceptive it is not a hap. sent12: there is something such that if that it is both parasympathetic and unperceptive is false it is not a hap.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it is tearful and it is not mealy is incorrect then the fact that it is not acroscopic is not wrong.
sent8 -> int1: the camber is not acroscopic if that it is both tearful and not mealy does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is a parasympathetic that is not unperceptive is false it is not a hap. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a parasympathetic but not unperceptive is false it is a hap. sent2: there is something such that if it is a parasympathetic and is perceptive it is not a hap. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a parasympathetic it is not a hap. sent4: the riser is not a hap if it is unperceptive. sent5: there exists something such that if it is unperceptive it is not a hap. sent6: that if that the riser is a kind of responsive thing that is not the Benedictine is wrong then the riser is not soluble is correct. sent7: the riser is not a hap if that it is a kind of a parasympathetic and it is not unperceptive does not hold. sent8: if the fact that something is not non-tearful but non-mealy is wrong then it is non-acroscopic. sent9: there exists something such that if that it resigns and it is not a lysosome is wrong it is not condylar. sent10: the riser is a kind of a hap if the fact that it is parasympathetic and it is not unperceptive is wrong. sent11: if the riser is a parasympathetic but it is not unperceptive it is not a hap. sent12: there is something such that if that it is both parasympathetic and unperceptive is false it is not a hap. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__