the intruding happens and/or the grill does not occur.
sent1: if the propulsiveness does not occur the referring does not occur and the ostentatiousness does not occur. sent2: the fact that either the plagioclasticness happens or the Corsicanness does not occur or both is wrong if that the tastelessness does not occur is not false. sent3: that the referring does not occur and the ostentatiousness does not occur is not right if the thronging happens. sent4: that the propulsiveness does not occur is right. sent5: the nebularness does not occur and the rearing fuss does not occur. sent6: the ostentatiousness does not occur. sent7: if that the coffining brimstone occurs and/or the streaming does not occur is not true the existentialness does not occur. sent8: if the playing does not occur the branchiness does not occur. sent9: the plagioclasticness does not occur if the tastelessness does not occur. sent10: the glissading does not occur. sent11: if the fact that either the plagioclasticness or the non-Corsicanness or both occurs is incorrect the grill does not occur. sent12: the coffining lineage does not occur. sent13: the existentialness does not occur. sent14: the tastelessness does not occur if the thronging does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thronging occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the referring does not occur and the ostentatiousness does not occur is wrong.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the referring does not occur and the ostentatiousness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the thronging does not occur hold.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the tastelessness does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the plagioclasticness and/or the non-Corsicanness happens is wrong.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the grill does not occur.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the intruding occurs and/or the grilling does not occur is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the intruding happens and/or the grill does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the propulsiveness does not occur the referring does not occur and the ostentatiousness does not occur. sent2: the fact that either the plagioclasticness happens or the Corsicanness does not occur or both is wrong if that the tastelessness does not occur is not false. sent3: that the referring does not occur and the ostentatiousness does not occur is not right if the thronging happens. sent4: that the propulsiveness does not occur is right. sent5: the nebularness does not occur and the rearing fuss does not occur. sent6: the ostentatiousness does not occur. sent7: if that the coffining brimstone occurs and/or the streaming does not occur is not true the existentialness does not occur. sent8: if the playing does not occur the branchiness does not occur. sent9: the plagioclasticness does not occur if the tastelessness does not occur. sent10: the glissading does not occur. sent11: if the fact that either the plagioclasticness or the non-Corsicanness or both occurs is incorrect the grill does not occur. sent12: the coffining lineage does not occur. sent13: the existentialness does not occur. sent14: the tastelessness does not occur if the thronging does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thronging occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the referring does not occur and the ostentatiousness does not occur is wrong.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the referring does not occur and the ostentatiousness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the thronging does not occur hold.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the tastelessness does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the plagioclasticness and/or the non-Corsicanness happens is wrong.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the grill does not occur.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__