the fact that either the brooming prescience or the inevitableness or both happens does not hold.
sent1: that the unhappiness happens leads to the opportuneness. sent2: if the recoverableness and the opportuneness occurs the fact that the injection does not occur is right. sent3: the cooking does not occur and the brooming Vermeer does not occur. sent4: that the sparkle does not occur is brought about by that the boosting does not occur and the livableness does not occur. sent5: if the bestrewing discoloration occurs then the unhappiness happens. sent6: that not the sparkle but the afterglow occurs triggers the convexness. sent7: the fact that the injection occurs is not wrong if the convexness happens. sent8: the bestrewing discoloration occurs. sent9: the afterglow occurs if the cooking does not occur and the brooming Vermeer does not occur. sent10: the boosting does not occur and the livableness does not occur. sent11: if that the recoverableness does not occur is correct either the brooming prescience occurs or the inevitable occurs or both.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the unhappiness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the opportuneness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recoverableness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the recoverableness occurs and the opportuneness occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the injection does not occur.; sent4 & sent10 -> int5: the sparkling does not occur.; sent9 & sent3 -> int6: the afterglow happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: not the sparkling but the afterglow happens.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the convexness occurs.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the injection occurs.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the recoverableness does not occur.; int11 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the brooming prescience or the inevitableness or both happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the unhappiness happens leads to the opportuneness. sent2: if the recoverableness and the opportuneness occurs the fact that the injection does not occur is right. sent3: the cooking does not occur and the brooming Vermeer does not occur. sent4: that the sparkle does not occur is brought about by that the boosting does not occur and the livableness does not occur. sent5: if the bestrewing discoloration occurs then the unhappiness happens. sent6: that not the sparkle but the afterglow occurs triggers the convexness. sent7: the fact that the injection occurs is not wrong if the convexness happens. sent8: the bestrewing discoloration occurs. sent9: the afterglow occurs if the cooking does not occur and the brooming Vermeer does not occur. sent10: the boosting does not occur and the livableness does not occur. sent11: if that the recoverableness does not occur is correct either the brooming prescience occurs or the inevitable occurs or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the unhappiness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the opportuneness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recoverableness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the recoverableness occurs and the opportuneness occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the injection does not occur.; sent4 & sent10 -> int5: the sparkling does not occur.; sent9 & sent3 -> int6: the afterglow happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: not the sparkling but the afterglow happens.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the convexness occurs.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the injection occurs.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the recoverableness does not occur.; int11 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__