the carob is an avant-garde.
sent1: the corpuscle does not corkscrew corpuscle if the fact that the puku does not corkscrew Atticus and/or it corkscrew corpuscle is incorrect. sent2: the puku does not result. sent3: the stile is not a suet if the fact that the waterfall is not a angelology but zoonotic is false. sent4: if the puku is not a result the fact that it does not corkscrew Atticus or corkscrews corpuscle or both does not hold. sent5: the carob is disreputable. sent6: if the waterfall is a cotter the corpuscle corkscrews corpuscle. sent7: something is a cotter if the fact that it is both not a angelology and zoonotic is right. sent8: if the stile is not a suet then the carob is an avant-garde that is disreputable.
sent7 -> int1: if the waterfall is not a angelology but it is zoonotic it is a cotter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waterfall is not a kind of a angelology but it is zoonotic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the waterfall is a kind of a cotter.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the corpuscle corkscrews corpuscle is not incorrect.; sent4 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the puku does not corkscrew Atticus or it does corkscrew corpuscle or both is not correct.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the corpuscle does not corkscrew corpuscle.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the waterfall is not a kind of a angelology and is zoonotic is not right.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the stile is not a suet.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the carob is an avant-garde and it is disreputable.; int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the carob is an avant-garde. ; $context$ = sent1: the corpuscle does not corkscrew corpuscle if the fact that the puku does not corkscrew Atticus and/or it corkscrew corpuscle is incorrect. sent2: the puku does not result. sent3: the stile is not a suet if the fact that the waterfall is not a angelology but zoonotic is false. sent4: if the puku is not a result the fact that it does not corkscrew Atticus or corkscrews corpuscle or both does not hold. sent5: the carob is disreputable. sent6: if the waterfall is a cotter the corpuscle corkscrews corpuscle. sent7: something is a cotter if the fact that it is both not a angelology and zoonotic is right. sent8: if the stile is not a suet then the carob is an avant-garde that is disreputable. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the waterfall is not a angelology but it is zoonotic it is a cotter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waterfall is not a kind of a angelology but it is zoonotic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the waterfall is a kind of a cotter.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the corpuscle corkscrews corpuscle is not incorrect.; sent4 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the puku does not corkscrew Atticus or it does corkscrew corpuscle or both is not correct.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the corpuscle does not corkscrew corpuscle.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the waterfall is not a kind of a angelology and is zoonotic is not right.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the stile is not a suet.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the carob is an avant-garde and it is disreputable.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__