the fact that that both the grumbling Pipridae and the non-topologicalness happens is correct is false.
sent1: the wrestling outfitter does not occur if the bagging happens and the contributing occurs. sent2: that the wrestling outfitter occurs and the sphericalness happens is not wrong. sent3: if the demanding does not occur that the grumbling Pipridae occurs and the topologicalness occurs does not hold. sent4: the emasculation occurs. sent5: the sphericalness occurs. sent6: the unairworthiness happens. sent7: the fact that both the grumbling Pipridae and the topologicalness occurs does not hold. sent8: the fact that the grumbling Pipridae but not the topologicalness happens is wrong if the demanding does not occur. sent9: the contributing and the emasculation occurs. sent10: if the demand happens the bag happens. sent11: the topologicalness does not occur if the fact that the wrestling outfitter and the contributing happens is not correct. sent12: the fact that the wrestling outfitter and the contributing occurs is not right if the emasculation does not occur. sent13: if the contributing does not occur the demanding occurs and/or the bagging happens. sent14: the presuming occurs. sent15: the nonsphericalness yields that the bagging does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demand happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the bagging occurs.; sent9 -> int2: the contributing occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the bag and the contributing occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the wrestling outfitter does not occur.; sent2 -> int5: the wrestling outfitter occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the demand does not occur.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the filialness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that both the grumbling Pipridae and the non-topologicalness happens is correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the wrestling outfitter does not occur if the bagging happens and the contributing occurs. sent2: that the wrestling outfitter occurs and the sphericalness happens is not wrong. sent3: if the demanding does not occur that the grumbling Pipridae occurs and the topologicalness occurs does not hold. sent4: the emasculation occurs. sent5: the sphericalness occurs. sent6: the unairworthiness happens. sent7: the fact that both the grumbling Pipridae and the topologicalness occurs does not hold. sent8: the fact that the grumbling Pipridae but not the topologicalness happens is wrong if the demanding does not occur. sent9: the contributing and the emasculation occurs. sent10: if the demand happens the bag happens. sent11: the topologicalness does not occur if the fact that the wrestling outfitter and the contributing happens is not correct. sent12: the fact that the wrestling outfitter and the contributing occurs is not right if the emasculation does not occur. sent13: if the contributing does not occur the demanding occurs and/or the bagging happens. sent14: the presuming occurs. sent15: the nonsphericalness yields that the bagging does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demand happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the bagging occurs.; sent9 -> int2: the contributing occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the bag and the contributing occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the wrestling outfitter does not occur.; sent2 -> int5: the wrestling outfitter occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the demand does not occur.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__