that the Bam but not the mind occurs is wrong.
sent1: the low-tensionness happens and/or the internationalness happens if the focalness does not occur. sent2: the weeding fly and the prismaticness occurs. sent3: the cornering Sind does not occur if the fact that the cornering Sind occurs and the yodeling occurs is incorrect. sent4: the prismaticness happens. sent5: if the yodeling does not occur then the Bam happens and the mind does not occur. sent6: the camping jewelry does not occur if that the unfaithfulness occurs and the retirement does not occur is false. sent7: the quarrel occurs. sent8: the non-neurophysiologicalness is prevented by that the unservileness does not occur. sent9: the non-unservileness brings about that not the weeding fly but the neurophysiologicalness happens. sent10: the focalness happens. sent11: the mind does not occur. sent12: that the unservileness happens and the weeding fly occurs is brought about by the non-neurophysiologicalness. sent13: the shelter does not occur. sent14: if the yodeling does not occur then the minding does not occur. sent15: that not the weeding olive-green but the yaws occurs does not hold if the ending happens. sent16: the neurophysiologicalness occurs. sent17: that both the non-neurophysiologicalness and the prismaticness occurs is caused by that the camping jewelry does not occur. sent18: that the unfaithfulness but not the retirement happens is not true if the yaws does not occur. sent19: if the weeding inamorata occurs then that the ending happens is not wrong. sent20: if that the quarrel does not occur is true then the fact that the Bam but not the mind happens is not right. sent21: the bettering menhir does not occur. sent22: that the yawing does not occur if the fact that the weeding olive-green does not occur and the yawing happens is not true is not false. sent23: that both the quarrelling and the yodeling occurs yields the non-unservileness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the yodeling happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: both the quarrelling and the yodeling occurs.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the unservileness does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the weeding fly does not occur but the neurophysiologicalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the weeding fly does not occur.; sent2 -> int5: the weeding fly occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the yodeling does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the Bam occurs and the minding does not occur is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = that the Bam but not the mind occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the low-tensionness happens and/or the internationalness happens if the focalness does not occur. sent2: the weeding fly and the prismaticness occurs. sent3: the cornering Sind does not occur if the fact that the cornering Sind occurs and the yodeling occurs is incorrect. sent4: the prismaticness happens. sent5: if the yodeling does not occur then the Bam happens and the mind does not occur. sent6: the camping jewelry does not occur if that the unfaithfulness occurs and the retirement does not occur is false. sent7: the quarrel occurs. sent8: the non-neurophysiologicalness is prevented by that the unservileness does not occur. sent9: the non-unservileness brings about that not the weeding fly but the neurophysiologicalness happens. sent10: the focalness happens. sent11: the mind does not occur. sent12: that the unservileness happens and the weeding fly occurs is brought about by the non-neurophysiologicalness. sent13: the shelter does not occur. sent14: if the yodeling does not occur then the minding does not occur. sent15: that not the weeding olive-green but the yaws occurs does not hold if the ending happens. sent16: the neurophysiologicalness occurs. sent17: that both the non-neurophysiologicalness and the prismaticness occurs is caused by that the camping jewelry does not occur. sent18: that the unfaithfulness but not the retirement happens is not true if the yaws does not occur. sent19: if the weeding inamorata occurs then that the ending happens is not wrong. sent20: if that the quarrel does not occur is true then the fact that the Bam but not the mind happens is not right. sent21: the bettering menhir does not occur. sent22: that the yawing does not occur if the fact that the weeding olive-green does not occur and the yawing happens is not true is not false. sent23: that both the quarrelling and the yodeling occurs yields the non-unservileness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the yodeling happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: both the quarrelling and the yodeling occurs.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the unservileness does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the weeding fly does not occur but the neurophysiologicalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the weeding fly does not occur.; sent2 -> int5: the weeding fly occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the yodeling does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__