either the classics is a kind of a paraphrase or it does communicate tip or both.
sent1: if the burl does not disentangle and sprays hemostat the neutron is not phonemic. sent2: the neutron is antemeridian. sent3: the neutron communicates tip. sent4: if the neutron does not disentangle the vasopressor does communicate tip and it is phonemic. sent5: either the classics is a kind of an adolescent or it sprays widgeon or both. sent6: the neutron does paraphrase and/or it does communicate gumma. sent7: the neutron is phonemic. sent8: the neutron is a paraphrase. sent9: if that the classics does not spray hemostat and it does not disentangle is not right then the neutron does not disentangle. sent10: the burl is a paraphrase that does communicate thunk if it does not spray fuji. sent11: the top is phonemic. sent12: something sprays hemostat if it is a trajectory. sent13: that something does not spray fuji and does communicate thunk is not right if it is a trapshooter. sent14: the burl does not disentangle if there is something such that the fact that it does not spray fuji and communicates thunk does not hold. sent15: if the neutron is phonemic the classics disentangles. sent16: the classics communicates chauvinism. sent17: if the fact that the neutron is phonemic is correct it communicates tip. sent18: something that disentangles is a kind of a paraphrase. sent19: the hemostat is a trapshooter. sent20: the fact that the classics paraphrases or it communicates tip or both is not true if the neutron is not phonemic.
sent15 & sent7 -> int1: the classics disentangles.; sent18 -> int2: the classics paraphrases if it disentangles.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the classics paraphrases.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the vasopressor does communicate tip.
$hypothesis$ = either the classics is a kind of a paraphrase or it does communicate tip or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burl does not disentangle and sprays hemostat the neutron is not phonemic. sent2: the neutron is antemeridian. sent3: the neutron communicates tip. sent4: if the neutron does not disentangle the vasopressor does communicate tip and it is phonemic. sent5: either the classics is a kind of an adolescent or it sprays widgeon or both. sent6: the neutron does paraphrase and/or it does communicate gumma. sent7: the neutron is phonemic. sent8: the neutron is a paraphrase. sent9: if that the classics does not spray hemostat and it does not disentangle is not right then the neutron does not disentangle. sent10: the burl is a paraphrase that does communicate thunk if it does not spray fuji. sent11: the top is phonemic. sent12: something sprays hemostat if it is a trajectory. sent13: that something does not spray fuji and does communicate thunk is not right if it is a trapshooter. sent14: the burl does not disentangle if there is something such that the fact that it does not spray fuji and communicates thunk does not hold. sent15: if the neutron is phonemic the classics disentangles. sent16: the classics communicates chauvinism. sent17: if the fact that the neutron is phonemic is correct it communicates tip. sent18: something that disentangles is a kind of a paraphrase. sent19: the hemostat is a trapshooter. sent20: the fact that the classics paraphrases or it communicates tip or both is not true if the neutron is not phonemic. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent7 -> int1: the classics disentangles.; sent18 -> int2: the classics paraphrases if it disentangles.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the classics paraphrases.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__