the impressiveness happens.
sent1: the impressiveness happens if the chaining cornea happens. sent2: that the staging but not the Eddy happens is wrong. sent3: the smocking Poecilocapsus happens if that the fact that the stage occurs but the Eddy does not occur is not correct is right. sent4: if the smocking Poecilocapsus occurs then the chaining cornea occurs.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the smocking Poecilocapsus occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the chaining cornea occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the impressiveness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the impressiveness happens if the chaining cornea happens. sent2: that the staging but not the Eddy happens is wrong. sent3: the smocking Poecilocapsus happens if that the fact that the stage occurs but the Eddy does not occur is not correct is right. sent4: if the smocking Poecilocapsus occurs then the chaining cornea occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the smocking Poecilocapsus occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the chaining cornea occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__