the epigenesis is not a subeditor and converges.
sent1: that the fact that something is a kind of a dauber and indulges is not right if it does not snooker bullfighter is right. sent2: the epigenesis is not a cicero if the ctenidium is a cicero and is a kind of a subeditor. sent3: the ctenidium is not a cicero. sent4: the fact that the tiller is a Megadermatidae is not incorrect. sent5: that the fact that the pelican does not iridesce and is not a kind of a Boswellia is not true is correct if the tiller does not strengthen Sequoiadendron. sent6: something iridesces if the fact that it does not iridesces and is not a Boswellia is not right. sent7: the nitrobenzene does not dematerialize. sent8: the Berry is not a acerola but a case. sent9: the epigenesis is a dauber if it does not indulge. sent10: if something that is Aboriginal is not dynamic then the Berry is not an allegory. sent11: if the fact that the epigenesis does not snooker bullfighter and indulges is not true it is a dauber. sent12: if the ctenidium is not a cicero the fact that the Berry does burden and/or does not strengthen communization is not correct. sent13: the epigenesis is not a cicero if that the ctenidium is a dauber and does indulge is incorrect. sent14: the fact that that the pelican indulges but it is not a dauber is not correct hold if it snookers bullfighter. sent15: if something is a dauber it is not a kind of a subeditor. sent16: if something that does not dematerialize is a Megadermatidae it does not strengthen Sequoiadendron. sent17: the fact that something does snooker bullfighter and is a acerola is not true if it is not an allegory. sent18: the epigenesis converges if the fact that the Berry burdens or does not strengthen communization or both is incorrect. sent19: something is Aboriginal but it is not a dynamic if it does iridesce. sent20: the Berry is not a burden. sent21: the nitrobenzene is not a kind of a stillness. sent22: if the ctenidium is not a cicero the Berry does not burden. sent23: that the tiller does not dematerialize hold if the nitrobenzene is not a stillness and it does not dematerialize. sent24: if something is not a cicero the fact that it is not a subeditor and it converges is false. sent25: the fact that something either is a kind of a spouse or does not strengthen communization or both does not hold if it is not a cicero.
sent12 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Berry is a burden or it does not strengthen communization or both is false.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the epigenesis converges.; sent15 -> int3: that the epigenesis is not a subeditor is right if it is a dauber.;
the fact that the epigenesis is a spouse and/or it does not strengthen communization is not right.
sent25 -> int4: if the epigenesis is not a cicero that it is a spouse and/or does not strengthen communization is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the epigenesis is not a subeditor and converges. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that something is a kind of a dauber and indulges is not right if it does not snooker bullfighter is right. sent2: the epigenesis is not a cicero if the ctenidium is a cicero and is a kind of a subeditor. sent3: the ctenidium is not a cicero. sent4: the fact that the tiller is a Megadermatidae is not incorrect. sent5: that the fact that the pelican does not iridesce and is not a kind of a Boswellia is not true is correct if the tiller does not strengthen Sequoiadendron. sent6: something iridesces if the fact that it does not iridesces and is not a Boswellia is not right. sent7: the nitrobenzene does not dematerialize. sent8: the Berry is not a acerola but a case. sent9: the epigenesis is a dauber if it does not indulge. sent10: if something that is Aboriginal is not dynamic then the Berry is not an allegory. sent11: if the fact that the epigenesis does not snooker bullfighter and indulges is not true it is a dauber. sent12: if the ctenidium is not a cicero the fact that the Berry does burden and/or does not strengthen communization is not correct. sent13: the epigenesis is not a cicero if that the ctenidium is a dauber and does indulge is incorrect. sent14: the fact that that the pelican indulges but it is not a dauber is not correct hold if it snookers bullfighter. sent15: if something is a dauber it is not a kind of a subeditor. sent16: if something that does not dematerialize is a Megadermatidae it does not strengthen Sequoiadendron. sent17: the fact that something does snooker bullfighter and is a acerola is not true if it is not an allegory. sent18: the epigenesis converges if the fact that the Berry burdens or does not strengthen communization or both is incorrect. sent19: something is Aboriginal but it is not a dynamic if it does iridesce. sent20: the Berry is not a burden. sent21: the nitrobenzene is not a kind of a stillness. sent22: if the ctenidium is not a cicero the Berry does not burden. sent23: that the tiller does not dematerialize hold if the nitrobenzene is not a stillness and it does not dematerialize. sent24: if something is not a cicero the fact that it is not a subeditor and it converges is false. sent25: the fact that something either is a kind of a spouse or does not strengthen communization or both does not hold if it is not a cicero. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Berry is a burden or it does not strengthen communization or both is false.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the epigenesis converges.; sent15 -> int3: that the epigenesis is not a subeditor is right if it is a dauber.; __UNKNOWN__