that the disputant is not a conservative and it is not a nonintervention is not true.
sent1: something that is not a nonintervention is not a kind of a net and does not politicize. sent2: there is something such that it does not subtilize spectrophotometer. sent3: that if that the charioteer does not subtilize spectrophotometer but it is the Bantu is incorrect then the charioteer does not net hold. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of a kobo but it does skip inspissation does not hold if it does not politicize. sent5: something does not politicize if that it is not a trash and it is impressionable is incorrect. sent6: if the spectrophotometer is a nonintervention that the fact that the disputant is not a conservative and not a nonintervention is true is not right. sent7: that the disputant is non-conservative a nonintervention is false. sent8: if there exists something such that it does subtilize spectrophotometer and it is a Bantu the spectrophotometer is a nonintervention. sent9: the spectrophotometer is a nonintervention if there exists something such that that it does not subtilize spectrophotometer and it is a kind of a Bantu hold. sent10: if the fact that something is not a trash and is a kind of a stencil is false it is a trash. sent11: that something is not a trash and is a stencil is not right if it is not a kind of a topped. sent12: if the fact that the indinavir is not impressionable is correct the fact that it does not politicize is right. sent13: if that something is a kind of non-net thing that politicizes is false it does not politicizes. sent14: the indinavir either is a Genevan or does not glom vulgarian or both. sent15: the disputant is a kind of a Bantu if something is not a nonintervention but it is a net. sent16: that the disputant is not a conservative but it is a kind of a nonintervention is incorrect if the spectrophotometer is a nonintervention. sent17: if that the charioteer is a kind of a net is wrong then the fact that the indinavir politicizes is not false. sent18: the indinavir is not topped if it is a Genevan. sent19: the charioteer is not impressionable if something does trash. sent20: the charioteer does not subtilize spectrophotometer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the charioteer does not subtilize spectrophotometer but it is a Bantu does not hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the charioteer is not a net.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the indinavir does politicize.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the indinavir is not a trash and is impressionable is not correct then it does not politicize.;
there is nothing such that it is not a kobo and it skips inspissation.
sent1 -> int4: if the indinavir is not a kind of a nonintervention it is non-net thing that does not politicize.; sent4 -> int5: if the charioteer does not politicize the fact that it is not a kobo and does skip inspissation is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the disputant is not a conservative and it is not a nonintervention is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a nonintervention is not a kind of a net and does not politicize. sent2: there is something such that it does not subtilize spectrophotometer. sent3: that if that the charioteer does not subtilize spectrophotometer but it is the Bantu is incorrect then the charioteer does not net hold. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of a kobo but it does skip inspissation does not hold if it does not politicize. sent5: something does not politicize if that it is not a trash and it is impressionable is incorrect. sent6: if the spectrophotometer is a nonintervention that the fact that the disputant is not a conservative and not a nonintervention is true is not right. sent7: that the disputant is non-conservative a nonintervention is false. sent8: if there exists something such that it does subtilize spectrophotometer and it is a Bantu the spectrophotometer is a nonintervention. sent9: the spectrophotometer is a nonintervention if there exists something such that that it does not subtilize spectrophotometer and it is a kind of a Bantu hold. sent10: if the fact that something is not a trash and is a kind of a stencil is false it is a trash. sent11: that something is not a trash and is a stencil is not right if it is not a kind of a topped. sent12: if the fact that the indinavir is not impressionable is correct the fact that it does not politicize is right. sent13: if that something is a kind of non-net thing that politicizes is false it does not politicizes. sent14: the indinavir either is a Genevan or does not glom vulgarian or both. sent15: the disputant is a kind of a Bantu if something is not a nonintervention but it is a net. sent16: that the disputant is not a conservative but it is a kind of a nonintervention is incorrect if the spectrophotometer is a nonintervention. sent17: if that the charioteer is a kind of a net is wrong then the fact that the indinavir politicizes is not false. sent18: the indinavir is not topped if it is a Genevan. sent19: the charioteer is not impressionable if something does trash. sent20: the charioteer does not subtilize spectrophotometer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the charioteer does not subtilize spectrophotometer but it is a Bantu does not hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the charioteer is not a net.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the indinavir does politicize.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the indinavir is not a trash and is impressionable is not correct then it does not politicize.; __UNKNOWN__