that the brooklet is a kind of stainable a civilian is wrong.
sent1: the lacing is not interlobular. sent2: the fact that the brooklet shrinks quadruplet but it does not shrink carouse is right if there exists something such that it is stainable. sent3: the gharry is interlobular if something that is not piscatorial does not murmur captivation. sent4: the Parmesan is not percussive if it does not ding self-flagellation. sent5: if something that is piscatorial does not shrink quadruplet the lacing is not percussive. sent6: if the fact that the Addressograph is not a photograph but it murmurs immersion is not true then it is not piscatorial. sent7: if that the Parmesan is both percussive and tidal hold it does shrink carouse. sent8: something is not percussive and is tidal if it does not ding self-flagellation. sent9: the brooklet is civilian. sent10: the Parmesan does not shrink quadruplet. sent11: if that something is piscatorial and it is interlobular hold then the Parmesan does not shrink carouse. sent12: the brooklet is stainable if the Parmesan dings self-flagellation but it does not shrink quadruplet. sent13: the nondevelopment does not ding self-flagellation if the brooklet does shrink quadruplet and does not shrink carouse. sent14: that something is a civilian but it is not stainable does not hold if it is interlobular. sent15: if the lacing is not piscatorial then it is non-tidal thing that is stainable. sent16: The quadruplet does not shrink Parmesan. sent17: if something does not ding self-flagellation then it is not percussive. sent18: something shrinks carouse if it is percussive and it is tidal. sent19: something shrinks carouse if it is not percussive and it is tidal. sent20: that that the Addressograph is not a photograph and does murmur immersion does not hold is true. sent21: if there is something such that the fact that it is civilian and it is not stainable is incorrect the lacing is stainable. sent22: if something does not ding self-flagellation then that it is stainable and it is a civilian does not hold. sent23: the Parmesan is not percussive. sent24: if something that is piscatorial is not interlobular the Parmesan does not shrink carouse. sent25: the lacing is piscatorial but not interlobular. sent26: something is not interlobular. sent27: the fact that the Addressograph does not murmur captivation hold.
sent8 -> int1: if the Parmesan does not ding self-flagellation it is not percussive and it is tidal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Parmesan does not ding self-flagellation.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Parmesan is not percussive but it is tidal.; sent19 -> int3: the Parmesan shrinks carouse if it is not percussive and it is tidal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Parmesan does shrink carouse.; sent25 -> int5: there is something such that it is both piscatorial and not interlobular.; int5 & sent24 -> int6: the Parmesan does not shrink carouse.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Parmesan dings self-flagellation.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the Parmesan does ding self-flagellation and does not shrink quadruplet.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the brooklet is stainable.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the brooklet is stainable and is a kind of a civilian is incorrect.
sent22 -> int11: the fact that the brooklet is stainable and it is a civilian is incorrect if it does not ding self-flagellation.;
$hypothesis$ = that the brooklet is a kind of stainable a civilian is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the lacing is not interlobular. sent2: the fact that the brooklet shrinks quadruplet but it does not shrink carouse is right if there exists something such that it is stainable. sent3: the gharry is interlobular if something that is not piscatorial does not murmur captivation. sent4: the Parmesan is not percussive if it does not ding self-flagellation. sent5: if something that is piscatorial does not shrink quadruplet the lacing is not percussive. sent6: if the fact that the Addressograph is not a photograph but it murmurs immersion is not true then it is not piscatorial. sent7: if that the Parmesan is both percussive and tidal hold it does shrink carouse. sent8: something is not percussive and is tidal if it does not ding self-flagellation. sent9: the brooklet is civilian. sent10: the Parmesan does not shrink quadruplet. sent11: if that something is piscatorial and it is interlobular hold then the Parmesan does not shrink carouse. sent12: the brooklet is stainable if the Parmesan dings self-flagellation but it does not shrink quadruplet. sent13: the nondevelopment does not ding self-flagellation if the brooklet does shrink quadruplet and does not shrink carouse. sent14: that something is a civilian but it is not stainable does not hold if it is interlobular. sent15: if the lacing is not piscatorial then it is non-tidal thing that is stainable. sent16: The quadruplet does not shrink Parmesan. sent17: if something does not ding self-flagellation then it is not percussive. sent18: something shrinks carouse if it is percussive and it is tidal. sent19: something shrinks carouse if it is not percussive and it is tidal. sent20: that that the Addressograph is not a photograph and does murmur immersion does not hold is true. sent21: if there is something such that the fact that it is civilian and it is not stainable is incorrect the lacing is stainable. sent22: if something does not ding self-flagellation then that it is stainable and it is a civilian does not hold. sent23: the Parmesan is not percussive. sent24: if something that is piscatorial is not interlobular the Parmesan does not shrink carouse. sent25: the lacing is piscatorial but not interlobular. sent26: something is not interlobular. sent27: the fact that the Addressograph does not murmur captivation hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the Parmesan does not ding self-flagellation it is not percussive and it is tidal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Parmesan does not ding self-flagellation.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Parmesan is not percussive but it is tidal.; sent19 -> int3: the Parmesan shrinks carouse if it is not percussive and it is tidal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Parmesan does shrink carouse.; sent25 -> int5: there is something such that it is both piscatorial and not interlobular.; int5 & sent24 -> int6: the Parmesan does not shrink carouse.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Parmesan dings self-flagellation.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the Parmesan does ding self-flagellation and does not shrink quadruplet.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the brooklet is stainable.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__