there exists something such that if it is a Job that it does not peruse gametocyte and does not peruse atmometer is not true.
sent1: if something is a grandiosity it is not a leaker and it does not smoke. sent2: there is something such that if it briefs Nancere then that it does brief yak and is not predestinarian is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it briefs broad-bean then it is not neritic and it is not a loment. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a sapidity then it does not afford and it is not a kind of a loment. sent5: the fact that something does not peruse gametocyte and does not peruse atmometer is wrong if it is a kind of a Job. sent6: there exists something such that if it does average it is both not a territorial and not extraordinary. sent7: that something does not impinge covariance and peruses awn is not right if it is a tribuneship. sent8: there is something such that if it peruses chard that it is a kind of a maxwell and it is not predestinarian is false. sent9: there is something such that if it impinges statue then that it does not brief fascicle and is unprovocative is not right. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of a fanatic that is not a mountain does not hold if it is a naphthalene. sent11: if something is a computer then the fact that it is sudden and it is not fossorial is not correct. sent12: that something does not brief fascicle and is not a kind of a computer is not right if it is rigid. sent13: the fact that the Praetorian does not peruse gametocyte and it is not a kind of a basidiospore is not right if it is a litigation. sent14: if something is a kind of a dissolubility then the fact that it is not politic and it is a revoke is not correct.
sent5 -> int1: if the Praetorian is a kind of a Job that it does not peruse gametocyte and does not peruse atmometer is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a Job that it does not peruse gametocyte and does not peruse atmometer is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a grandiosity it is not a leaker and it does not smoke. sent2: there is something such that if it briefs Nancere then that it does brief yak and is not predestinarian is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it briefs broad-bean then it is not neritic and it is not a loment. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a sapidity then it does not afford and it is not a kind of a loment. sent5: the fact that something does not peruse gametocyte and does not peruse atmometer is wrong if it is a kind of a Job. sent6: there exists something such that if it does average it is both not a territorial and not extraordinary. sent7: that something does not impinge covariance and peruses awn is not right if it is a tribuneship. sent8: there is something such that if it peruses chard that it is a kind of a maxwell and it is not predestinarian is false. sent9: there is something such that if it impinges statue then that it does not brief fascicle and is unprovocative is not right. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of a fanatic that is not a mountain does not hold if it is a naphthalene. sent11: if something is a computer then the fact that it is sudden and it is not fossorial is not correct. sent12: that something does not brief fascicle and is not a kind of a computer is not right if it is rigid. sent13: the fact that the Praetorian does not peruse gametocyte and it is not a kind of a basidiospore is not right if it is a litigation. sent14: if something is a kind of a dissolubility then the fact that it is not politic and it is a revoke is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the Praetorian is a kind of a Job that it does not peruse gametocyte and does not peruse atmometer is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__