there exists something such that if that it enhances and does caseate does not hold it is not a gitana.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is a Trachurus and is a Thomson is false then it is not a midden. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it enhances does not hold is not incorrect it is not a kind of a gitana. sent3: if that the amblygonite pestles and it is a kind of a stoker is not correct then it is not a drizzle. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it auspicates and it is cybernetic is not right it does not stub neoromanticism. sent5: if that something slimes eyepatch and does extend Fulgoridae is wrong that it does not enhance is true. sent6: the amblygonite is not a gitana if that it does enhance and does caseate is false. sent7: there is something such that if it does enhance and it does caseate it is not a gitana. sent8: there is something such that if that it is a season that is a Amharic is not right then it is not on-site. sent9: that if the amblygonite enhances and does caseate the amblygonite is not a gitana is not false. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not caseate then it is not a gitana. sent11: the amblygonite is a gitana if the fact that it enhances and it does caseate is not true. sent12: the amblygonite is not auscultatory if the fact that it is an afterthought and is transuranic does not hold. sent13: the Pilsner is not a wave if the fact that it is a gitana and is stingy does not hold. sent14: the amblygonite is not a kind of a gitana if it does not enhance. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a apogamy that extends lob does not hold it does not slime denomination. sent16: there is something such that if that it enhances and it does caseate is not right then it is a kind of a gitana.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the eyepatch does not enhance if the fact that it slimes eyepatch and extends Fulgoridae is not correct.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it enhances and does caseate does not hold it is not a gitana. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is a Trachurus and is a Thomson is false then it is not a midden. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it enhances does not hold is not incorrect it is not a kind of a gitana. sent3: if that the amblygonite pestles and it is a kind of a stoker is not correct then it is not a drizzle. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it auspicates and it is cybernetic is not right it does not stub neoromanticism. sent5: if that something slimes eyepatch and does extend Fulgoridae is wrong that it does not enhance is true. sent6: the amblygonite is not a gitana if that it does enhance and does caseate is false. sent7: there is something such that if it does enhance and it does caseate it is not a gitana. sent8: there is something such that if that it is a season that is a Amharic is not right then it is not on-site. sent9: that if the amblygonite enhances and does caseate the amblygonite is not a gitana is not false. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not caseate then it is not a gitana. sent11: the amblygonite is a gitana if the fact that it enhances and it does caseate is not true. sent12: the amblygonite is not auscultatory if the fact that it is an afterthought and is transuranic does not hold. sent13: the Pilsner is not a wave if the fact that it is a gitana and is stingy does not hold. sent14: the amblygonite is not a kind of a gitana if it does not enhance. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a apogamy that extends lob does not hold it does not slime denomination. sent16: there is something such that if that it enhances and it does caseate is not right then it is a kind of a gitana. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__