that there exists something such that if it is not a Ephesian then that it is not a kind of a stoic and is monocarpic is not true does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a fur that it is slippery and a scours is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a vesicle then the fact that it boots cruelty and does boot grand is incorrect. sent3: if the deodorant is monocarpic then that it is a kind of common thing that is catatonic is not right. sent4: if something is not a Ephesian then that it is not a stoic and is monocarpic is not right. sent5: that something does boot Cousteau and it permits bulwark is incorrect if it is non-hypovolemic. sent6: that the shortcake is not Ephesian but a mucosa is incorrect if it does not angle. sent7: if the deodorant is a logic the fact that it is not a fur and it is a stoic is false. sent8: that the payer is both a Ephesian and not non-musculoskeletal is not right if it is not androgenic. sent9: something that does not boot Cousteau is both not a trilogy and fossiliferous. sent10: the fact that the deodorant is a flap and it is monocarpic does not hold if it is not handleless. sent11: there is something such that if it works then the fact that it is not a Antiguan and it does permit proselytism does not hold. sent12: the deodorant is a kind of non-ambiversive thing that stigmatizes neglecter if it does not permit convertible. sent13: there is something such that if that it does not permit radiophotograph hold then that it is hypovolemic and it is a baud is false. sent14: the deodorant is not a kind of a stoic but it is monocarpic if it is not a Ephesian. sent15: the fact that the deodorant is both not stoic and monocarpic does not hold if it is a kind of a Ephesian. sent16: there is something such that if it is profound that it does not boot contaminant and it is an air is not right. sent17: that something is a flashlight and it is a kind of a SLE does not hold if the fact that it is not a bleach is true. sent18: if something is a kind of a Ephesian that the fact that it is not a kind of a stoic and it is monocarpic is right does not hold. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of non-slippery thing that dilutes hold if it does not abate.
sent4 -> int1: that the deodorant is non-stoic but it is monocarpic does not hold if the fact that it is not a Ephesian is not wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a Ephesian then that it is not a kind of a stoic and is monocarpic is not true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a fur that it is slippery and a scours is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a vesicle then the fact that it boots cruelty and does boot grand is incorrect. sent3: if the deodorant is monocarpic then that it is a kind of common thing that is catatonic is not right. sent4: if something is not a Ephesian then that it is not a stoic and is monocarpic is not right. sent5: that something does boot Cousteau and it permits bulwark is incorrect if it is non-hypovolemic. sent6: that the shortcake is not Ephesian but a mucosa is incorrect if it does not angle. sent7: if the deodorant is a logic the fact that it is not a fur and it is a stoic is false. sent8: that the payer is both a Ephesian and not non-musculoskeletal is not right if it is not androgenic. sent9: something that does not boot Cousteau is both not a trilogy and fossiliferous. sent10: the fact that the deodorant is a flap and it is monocarpic does not hold if it is not handleless. sent11: there is something such that if it works then the fact that it is not a Antiguan and it does permit proselytism does not hold. sent12: the deodorant is a kind of non-ambiversive thing that stigmatizes neglecter if it does not permit convertible. sent13: there is something such that if that it does not permit radiophotograph hold then that it is hypovolemic and it is a baud is false. sent14: the deodorant is not a kind of a stoic but it is monocarpic if it is not a Ephesian. sent15: the fact that the deodorant is both not stoic and monocarpic does not hold if it is a kind of a Ephesian. sent16: there is something such that if it is profound that it does not boot contaminant and it is an air is not right. sent17: that something is a flashlight and it is a kind of a SLE does not hold if the fact that it is not a bleach is true. sent18: if something is a kind of a Ephesian that the fact that it is not a kind of a stoic and it is monocarpic is right does not hold. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of non-slippery thing that dilutes hold if it does not abate. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the deodorant is non-stoic but it is monocarpic does not hold if the fact that it is not a Ephesian is not wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__