the foster-father does not pair Vanbrugh.
sent1: if the flan is a kind of a metalware but it is not unreverberant then the numismatist is not a kind of a metalware. sent2: if something is not a kind of a metalware it squirts or it is a ex-husband or both. sent3: something that is not a fireclay does pair Vanbrugh and concentrates. sent4: something is reverberant and is not a metalware if it is non-on-line. sent5: the foster-father does not pair Vanbrugh if something does not supple scouring. sent6: that the crabgrass is a kind of a colloquium that supples scouring is not right. sent7: if that the gumbo is not attitudinal but it does pair five-spot is false the garboard is not on-line. sent8: the fact that the foster-father does not pair Vanbrugh but it concentrates is not right if the numismatist is not a fireclay. sent9: the heating is not autogenous if the foster-father is autogenous and it does pair Vanbrugh. sent10: the flan is both a metalware and not unreverberant. sent11: the crabgrass does not pair Vanbrugh if there exists something such that that it is a colloquium that supples scouring is wrong. sent12: if the fact that something does not pair Vanbrugh and concentrates is not true then it pair Vanbrugh. sent13: if the cocozelle is not a kind of a capulin that the gumbo is not attitudinal but it pairs five-spot is not right. sent14: the foster-father is autogenous if the numismatist is a ex-husband. sent15: the cocozelle is not a capulin if that it does supple containerful and does supple ordered is not wrong. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a ex-husband that squirts does not hold the baluster is not a ex-husband. sent17: if the garboard is not unreverberant and it is not a kind of a metalware the flan is not a metalware. sent18: the foster-father does not pair Vanbrugh if there exists something such that that it is a colloquium and supples scouring is not correct. sent19: if the flan is not a metalware the fact that it is a kind of a ex-husband and it squirts does not hold. sent20: if the numismatist does squirt then the foster-father is autogenous. sent21: that something is not non-Cuban but it is not a guitarist is not correct if it is not a ex-husband.
sent6 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a colloquium and supples scouring is false.; int1 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the heating is not autogenous.
sent2 -> int2: the numismatist squirts or it is a ex-husband or both if it is not a kind of a metalware.; sent1 & sent10 -> int3: the numismatist is not a kind of a metalware.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the numismatist either squirts or is a ex-husband or both.; int4 & sent20 & sent14 -> int5: the foster-father is autogenous.; sent3 -> int6: if the foster-father is not a fireclay then it does pair Vanbrugh and it concentrates.;
$hypothesis$ = the foster-father does not pair Vanbrugh. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flan is a kind of a metalware but it is not unreverberant then the numismatist is not a kind of a metalware. sent2: if something is not a kind of a metalware it squirts or it is a ex-husband or both. sent3: something that is not a fireclay does pair Vanbrugh and concentrates. sent4: something is reverberant and is not a metalware if it is non-on-line. sent5: the foster-father does not pair Vanbrugh if something does not supple scouring. sent6: that the crabgrass is a kind of a colloquium that supples scouring is not right. sent7: if that the gumbo is not attitudinal but it does pair five-spot is false the garboard is not on-line. sent8: the fact that the foster-father does not pair Vanbrugh but it concentrates is not right if the numismatist is not a fireclay. sent9: the heating is not autogenous if the foster-father is autogenous and it does pair Vanbrugh. sent10: the flan is both a metalware and not unreverberant. sent11: the crabgrass does not pair Vanbrugh if there exists something such that that it is a colloquium that supples scouring is wrong. sent12: if the fact that something does not pair Vanbrugh and concentrates is not true then it pair Vanbrugh. sent13: if the cocozelle is not a kind of a capulin that the gumbo is not attitudinal but it pairs five-spot is not right. sent14: the foster-father is autogenous if the numismatist is a ex-husband. sent15: the cocozelle is not a capulin if that it does supple containerful and does supple ordered is not wrong. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a ex-husband that squirts does not hold the baluster is not a ex-husband. sent17: if the garboard is not unreverberant and it is not a kind of a metalware the flan is not a metalware. sent18: the foster-father does not pair Vanbrugh if there exists something such that that it is a colloquium and supples scouring is not correct. sent19: if the flan is not a metalware the fact that it is a kind of a ex-husband and it squirts does not hold. sent20: if the numismatist does squirt then the foster-father is autogenous. sent21: that something is not non-Cuban but it is not a guitarist is not correct if it is not a ex-husband. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a colloquium and supples scouring is false.; int1 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__