the pornographer does not behold.
sent1: if the fact that the Circe is publishable and it is a blend does not hold the capsicum does not blend. sent2: the fact that the outhouse does indurate secondment and does not underdress is not correct if there exists something such that it is not .22-caliber. sent3: if there is something such that it is not psychoanalytical the outhouse does not clap chilling. sent4: the undercut is nonionic if there exists something such that it does not spurt storied. sent5: if the fact that the capsicum does not indurate Decius and is not a swat does not hold then it is not a sticktight. sent6: if the outhouse does clap chilling the fact that the seeder underdresses is not false. sent7: if the fact that the capsicum does spurt storied and it spurts undersecretary is false then the fact that the isothiocyanate does not spurt storied is correct. sent8: if a non-.22-caliber thing does not indurate secondment then it does not behold. sent9: the isothiocyanate is non-psychoanalytical if the capsicum is not a blend. sent10: the fact that the capsicum does not indurate Decius and it does not swat does not hold. sent11: if something is not ionic it does not blend and it is publishable. sent12: that the outhouse does underdress and does not behold is not true. sent13: something is non-.22-caliber thing that does not indurate secondment if it does underdress. sent14: the pornographer is psychoanalytical if the isothiocyanate is not a kind of a blend but it is publishable. sent15: something is .22-caliber. sent16: if something does not spurt storied and is not erythroid then it is not ionic. sent17: if the undercut is not ionic the fact that the Circe is publishable and is a blend is false. sent18: there exists nothing such that it claps chilling and/or it underdresses. sent19: if that the outhouse does indurate secondment but it does not underdress does not hold the pornographer does not behold. sent20: there exists something such that it does not spurt storied. sent21: if that the pornographer is not psychoanalytical does not hold then the outhouse does clap chilling. sent22: there exists something such that it is not .22-caliber. sent23: if the capsicum is not a sticktight then the fact that it spurts storied and it does spurt undersecretary does not hold.
sent22 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the outhouse indurates secondment and does not underdress is not right.; sent19 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the pornographer does behold.
sent20 & sent4 -> int2: the undercut is nonionic.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Circe is publishable and is a blend is incorrect.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the capsicum does not blend is not false.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the isothiocyanate is not psychoanalytical.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not psychoanalytical.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the outhouse does not clap chilling.;
$hypothesis$ = the pornographer does not behold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Circe is publishable and it is a blend does not hold the capsicum does not blend. sent2: the fact that the outhouse does indurate secondment and does not underdress is not correct if there exists something such that it is not .22-caliber. sent3: if there is something such that it is not psychoanalytical the outhouse does not clap chilling. sent4: the undercut is nonionic if there exists something such that it does not spurt storied. sent5: if the fact that the capsicum does not indurate Decius and is not a swat does not hold then it is not a sticktight. sent6: if the outhouse does clap chilling the fact that the seeder underdresses is not false. sent7: if the fact that the capsicum does spurt storied and it spurts undersecretary is false then the fact that the isothiocyanate does not spurt storied is correct. sent8: if a non-.22-caliber thing does not indurate secondment then it does not behold. sent9: the isothiocyanate is non-psychoanalytical if the capsicum is not a blend. sent10: the fact that the capsicum does not indurate Decius and it does not swat does not hold. sent11: if something is not ionic it does not blend and it is publishable. sent12: that the outhouse does underdress and does not behold is not true. sent13: something is non-.22-caliber thing that does not indurate secondment if it does underdress. sent14: the pornographer is psychoanalytical if the isothiocyanate is not a kind of a blend but it is publishable. sent15: something is .22-caliber. sent16: if something does not spurt storied and is not erythroid then it is not ionic. sent17: if the undercut is not ionic the fact that the Circe is publishable and is a blend is false. sent18: there exists nothing such that it claps chilling and/or it underdresses. sent19: if that the outhouse does indurate secondment but it does not underdress does not hold the pornographer does not behold. sent20: there exists something such that it does not spurt storied. sent21: if that the pornographer is not psychoanalytical does not hold then the outhouse does clap chilling. sent22: there exists something such that it is not .22-caliber. sent23: if the capsicum is not a sticktight then the fact that it spurts storied and it does spurt undersecretary does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the outhouse indurates secondment and does not underdress is not right.; sent19 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__