the pyrimidine is a kind of a mustiness.
sent1: the fact that the clabber is not non-phonological but it does not tramp pyrimidine is wrong if the speck directs factor. sent2: if the fact that the speck is not a kind of a tocopherol and it does not tramp pyrimidine is not false the clabber is not a tocopherol. sent3: that the Hausa is phonological but it is not a kind of a mustiness is not correct if the screener does not direct factor. sent4: if something is not phonological it is not a kind of a tocopherol and does not tramp pyrimidine. sent5: if the fact that the Hausa is calcaneal and does brooch babbitt is wrong then the fact that it is not calcaneal hold. sent6: if the screener is not calcaneal that it is not a newness and does direct factor is not true. sent7: the fact that the clabber is not a kind of the fan if the clabber is not a kind of a LGB is right. sent8: if the screener does not tramp pyrimidine then the pyrimidine does direct factor. sent9: the nankeen is a fan and is a LGB if the clabber is not a kind of a tocopherol. sent10: the fact that the Hausa is not a kind of a newness is right. sent11: the fact that the screener does not tramp pyrimidine is not false if the Hausa is a tocopherol or not phonological or both. sent12: if the clabber is a kind of a LGB the speck is not a kind of a tocopherol. sent13: if something is not a tocopherol then it is a kind of a LGB and it does not fan. sent14: the clabber is a kind of a fan if it is calcaneal. sent15: the clabber is calcaneal. sent16: the Hausa is a tocopherol and/or it is phonological. sent17: the fact that the Hausa is calcaneal and it brooches babbitt is not correct if it is not a newness. sent18: something is a mustiness if it directs factor. sent19: something is not a tocopherol if that it is phonological and it does not tramp pyrimidine is false. sent20: something does not direct factor if that it is not a newness and it does direct factor is not true. sent21: the speck is not phonological if that the Hausa is phonological but it is not a mustiness is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clabber is not a LGB.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the clabber does not fan.; sent14 & sent15 -> int2: the clabber is a kind of a fan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the clabber is a kind of a LGB.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the speck is not a kind of a tocopherol.; sent18 -> int6: if the pyrimidine does direct factor it is a mustiness.;
that the nankeen is a kind of a fan is not false.
sent4 -> int7: if that the speck is not phonological is right then it is not a tocopherol and it does not tramp pyrimidine.; sent20 -> int8: the screener does not direct factor if the fact that it is not a newness and does direct factor is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the pyrimidine is a kind of a mustiness. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the clabber is not non-phonological but it does not tramp pyrimidine is wrong if the speck directs factor. sent2: if the fact that the speck is not a kind of a tocopherol and it does not tramp pyrimidine is not false the clabber is not a tocopherol. sent3: that the Hausa is phonological but it is not a kind of a mustiness is not correct if the screener does not direct factor. sent4: if something is not phonological it is not a kind of a tocopherol and does not tramp pyrimidine. sent5: if the fact that the Hausa is calcaneal and does brooch babbitt is wrong then the fact that it is not calcaneal hold. sent6: if the screener is not calcaneal that it is not a newness and does direct factor is not true. sent7: the fact that the clabber is not a kind of the fan if the clabber is not a kind of a LGB is right. sent8: if the screener does not tramp pyrimidine then the pyrimidine does direct factor. sent9: the nankeen is a fan and is a LGB if the clabber is not a kind of a tocopherol. sent10: the fact that the Hausa is not a kind of a newness is right. sent11: the fact that the screener does not tramp pyrimidine is not false if the Hausa is a tocopherol or not phonological or both. sent12: if the clabber is a kind of a LGB the speck is not a kind of a tocopherol. sent13: if something is not a tocopherol then it is a kind of a LGB and it does not fan. sent14: the clabber is a kind of a fan if it is calcaneal. sent15: the clabber is calcaneal. sent16: the Hausa is a tocopherol and/or it is phonological. sent17: the fact that the Hausa is calcaneal and it brooches babbitt is not correct if it is not a newness. sent18: something is a mustiness if it directs factor. sent19: something is not a tocopherol if that it is phonological and it does not tramp pyrimidine is false. sent20: something does not direct factor if that it is not a newness and it does direct factor is not true. sent21: the speck is not phonological if that the Hausa is phonological but it is not a mustiness is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clabber is not a LGB.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the clabber does not fan.; sent14 & sent15 -> int2: the clabber is a kind of a fan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the clabber is a kind of a LGB.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the speck is not a kind of a tocopherol.; sent18 -> int6: if the pyrimidine does direct factor it is a mustiness.; __UNKNOWN__