the dubnium is maxillodental.
sent1: something is asexual and it does blunt if that it is not a groin is not false. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a groin that is not noncritical is not true if it is not descriptive. sent3: the dubnium scars if it is a kind of an organization and does not ferret specifier. sent4: that the coprolith ferrets specifier and does not grade is incorrect. sent5: the cradle is not maxillodental. sent6: that that the erythrite is not a groin is not wrong if there exists something such that that it is a groin and not noncritical is not right is not incorrect. sent7: the dubnium is not a scar if that the cradle is not a scar but it does wobble spare does not hold. sent8: something is not a rorqual if it does not wobble spare. sent9: the cradle wobbles spare and does not cloud imperativeness. sent10: if something does cloud imperativeness and is not a kind of a rorqual then it is not maxillodental. sent11: the fact that the dubnium is not a kind of a rorqual is not false. sent12: if the fact that the dubnium is an organization but it does not ferret specifier is incorrect it clouds imperativeness. sent13: the fact that the cradle is not a kind of a scar but it does wobble spare is false. sent14: if that the cradle does scar and does not cloud imperativeness does not hold then it is a rorqual. sent15: something is a reversible if it blunts. sent16: that the dubnium does not wobble spare but it is proud is incorrect. sent17: the damsel is a counterfire but it does not ferret specifier. sent18: if something is not Afghani it is not a rorqual. sent19: everything is nonlinguistic. sent20: if that something is not styleless and it is not capable is not true then it is not descriptive. sent21: the sambar does not wobble spare and/or it is not Afghani if the erythrite is reversible. sent22: the langouste clouds imperativeness if the decarboxylase does not clouds imperativeness. sent23: the cradle does cloud imperativeness if that the langouste does cloud imperativeness is true. sent24: if that the sambar does not scar and it does not cloud imperativeness is incorrect then the decarboxylase does not cloud imperativeness. sent25: that something is not styleless and it is not capable does not hold if it is nonlinguistic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dubnium is an organization and does not ferret specifier.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the dubnium does scar.; sent7 & sent13 -> int2: the dubnium does not scar.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the dubnium is an organization but it does not ferret specifier is incorrect.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the dubnium clouds imperativeness.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the dubnium does cloud imperativeness but it is not a rorqual.; sent10 -> int7: if the dubnium clouds imperativeness and is not a rorqual then it is not maxillodental.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the dubnium is maxillodental hold.
sent1 -> int8: if the erythrite is not a groin it is asexual and blunts.; sent2 -> int9: that the sild is a groin but it is not noncritical is not right if it is not descriptive.; sent20 -> int10: the sild is not descriptive if that the fact that it is not styleless and not capable hold does not hold.; sent25 -> int11: that the incarnation is not styleless and it is not capable is not true if it is nonlinguistic.; sent19 -> int12: the incarnation is nonlinguistic.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the fact that the incarnation is not styleless and it is not capable is not true is right.; int13 -> int14: there exists nothing such that it is not styleless and it is not capable.; int14 -> int15: that the sild is stylish and not capable is not correct.; int10 & int15 -> int16: the sild is not descriptive.; int9 & int16 -> int17: that the sild is a groin but it is not noncritical is wrong.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that the fact that it groins and is not noncritical is incorrect.; sent6 & int18 -> int19: the erythrite does not groin.; int8 & int19 -> int20: the erythrite is asexual thing that does blunt.; int20 -> int21: the erythrite blunts.; sent15 -> int22: if the erythrite blunts it is a reversible.; int21 & int22 -> int23: the erythrite is reversible.; sent21 & int23 -> int24: the sambar does not wobble spare and/or is not Afghani.; sent18 -> int25: if the sambar is non-Afghani it is not a rorqual.; sent8 -> int26: the sambar is not a rorqual if it does not wobble spare.; int24 & int25 & int26 -> int27: the sambar is not a kind of a rorqual.;
$hypothesis$ = the dubnium is maxillodental. ; $context$ = sent1: something is asexual and it does blunt if that it is not a groin is not false. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a groin that is not noncritical is not true if it is not descriptive. sent3: the dubnium scars if it is a kind of an organization and does not ferret specifier. sent4: that the coprolith ferrets specifier and does not grade is incorrect. sent5: the cradle is not maxillodental. sent6: that that the erythrite is not a groin is not wrong if there exists something such that that it is a groin and not noncritical is not right is not incorrect. sent7: the dubnium is not a scar if that the cradle is not a scar but it does wobble spare does not hold. sent8: something is not a rorqual if it does not wobble spare. sent9: the cradle wobbles spare and does not cloud imperativeness. sent10: if something does cloud imperativeness and is not a kind of a rorqual then it is not maxillodental. sent11: the fact that the dubnium is not a kind of a rorqual is not false. sent12: if the fact that the dubnium is an organization but it does not ferret specifier is incorrect it clouds imperativeness. sent13: the fact that the cradle is not a kind of a scar but it does wobble spare is false. sent14: if that the cradle does scar and does not cloud imperativeness does not hold then it is a rorqual. sent15: something is a reversible if it blunts. sent16: that the dubnium does not wobble spare but it is proud is incorrect. sent17: the damsel is a counterfire but it does not ferret specifier. sent18: if something is not Afghani it is not a rorqual. sent19: everything is nonlinguistic. sent20: if that something is not styleless and it is not capable is not true then it is not descriptive. sent21: the sambar does not wobble spare and/or it is not Afghani if the erythrite is reversible. sent22: the langouste clouds imperativeness if the decarboxylase does not clouds imperativeness. sent23: the cradle does cloud imperativeness if that the langouste does cloud imperativeness is true. sent24: if that the sambar does not scar and it does not cloud imperativeness is incorrect then the decarboxylase does not cloud imperativeness. sent25: that something is not styleless and it is not capable does not hold if it is nonlinguistic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dubnium is an organization and does not ferret specifier.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the dubnium does scar.; sent7 & sent13 -> int2: the dubnium does not scar.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the dubnium is an organization but it does not ferret specifier is incorrect.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the dubnium clouds imperativeness.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the dubnium does cloud imperativeness but it is not a rorqual.; sent10 -> int7: if the dubnium clouds imperativeness and is not a rorqual then it is not maxillodental.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__