the remedying happens if the securing happens.
sent1: the bailing does not occur. sent2: the accelerating does not occur. sent3: the emptying soil does not occur. sent4: that the scouting acarid happens is not incorrect if the consolidating plumbago and the convenientness happens. sent5: if the paleolithicness occurs the recoiling happens. sent6: the Offertory yields the attachableness. sent7: the electromyography occurs. sent8: the omnivorousness happens if the scavenging does not occur and the unidirectionalness does not occur. sent9: that the consolidating incarnation occurs is not incorrect. sent10: the nonprescriptionness does not occur. sent11: the sniffing liberty occurs. sent12: the adjuration does not occur if both the cogitating and the floweriness occurs. sent13: the spamming happens. sent14: that the covering occurs and the speed occurs leads to that the secureness does not occur. sent15: that both the phonicness and the combinativeness occurs triggers the consolidating mandolin. sent16: if the diazoness happens and the synapticness occurs the consolableness does not occur. sent17: the caudateness happens. sent18: the covering happens. sent19: the campaigning happens. sent20: the fact that the surveying occurs is not wrong. sent21: the sniffing paraquat does not occur. sent22: that the remedying does not occur is prevented by that the bail does not occur and the speed does not occur. sent23: the unidirectionalness does not occur and the consolidating rallying does not occur. sent24: the autofluorescence occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the speeding occurs.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the covering and the speed occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the secureness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the securing occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the speed does not occur.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the bail does not occur and the speeding does not occur.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: the remedying happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the remedying happens if the securing happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the bailing does not occur. sent2: the accelerating does not occur. sent3: the emptying soil does not occur. sent4: that the scouting acarid happens is not incorrect if the consolidating plumbago and the convenientness happens. sent5: if the paleolithicness occurs the recoiling happens. sent6: the Offertory yields the attachableness. sent7: the electromyography occurs. sent8: the omnivorousness happens if the scavenging does not occur and the unidirectionalness does not occur. sent9: that the consolidating incarnation occurs is not incorrect. sent10: the nonprescriptionness does not occur. sent11: the sniffing liberty occurs. sent12: the adjuration does not occur if both the cogitating and the floweriness occurs. sent13: the spamming happens. sent14: that the covering occurs and the speed occurs leads to that the secureness does not occur. sent15: that both the phonicness and the combinativeness occurs triggers the consolidating mandolin. sent16: if the diazoness happens and the synapticness occurs the consolableness does not occur. sent17: the caudateness happens. sent18: the covering happens. sent19: the campaigning happens. sent20: the fact that the surveying occurs is not wrong. sent21: the sniffing paraquat does not occur. sent22: that the remedying does not occur is prevented by that the bail does not occur and the speed does not occur. sent23: the unidirectionalness does not occur and the consolidating rallying does not occur. sent24: the autofluorescence occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the speeding occurs.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the covering and the speed occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the secureness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the securing occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the speed does not occur.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the bail does not occur and the speeding does not occur.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: the remedying happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__