the fact that the stonewaller is not croupy and it does not hype anvil is false.
sent1: if the safety hypes anvil that it is invitational thing that does not insert township does not hold. sent2: if the urceole does not insert township then the fact that it does not insert up-tick is true. sent3: that the stonewaller hypes safety and it inserts up-tick is not right if it inserts township. sent4: that the safety is not invitational and does not insert up-tick is not correct. sent5: the fact that something is non-croupy thing that does not hype anvil is not right if it does not insert township. sent6: the fact that something is not noble and is invitational does not hold if it is not a lobby. sent7: the stonewaller is not croupy and it does not hype anvil if the safety inserts township. sent8: if the stonewaller does not hype safety the fact that it is a kind of a lobby that does not hype anvil is false. sent9: the fact that the safety is a minivan and it is croupy is not correct. sent10: if the fact that something is invitational but it is not a kind of a lobby is wrong it is not invitational. sent11: if the fact that the safety is invitational is not incorrect then that it is croupy and it does not insert township does not hold. sent12: the safety is invitational if the fact that the stonewaller hypes safety but it does not insert up-tick is not right. sent13: that the safety is invitational but not a kweek is false. sent14: there is nothing such that it is invitational and it is not a lobby. sent15: that something is not a kind of a Stuttgart and is not uneager does not hold if it is not a flatulence. sent16: if something does not insert township that it is a kind of non-croupy thing that hypes anvil is not true. sent17: if the federalist is mortuary the fact that it is a kind of exterior thing that is not a humanist is incorrect. sent18: the fact that something is not an inflection is correct if that it is an inflection but not a gobbledygook is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stonewaller does insert township.; sent10 -> int1: if that that the safety is both invitational and not a lobby is right is not true it is not invitational.; sent14 -> int2: that the safety is both invitational and not a lobby is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the safety is not invitational is not incorrect.; sent5 -> int4: the fact that the stonewaller is non-croupy and it does not hype anvil is not right if it does not insert township.;
the stonewaller is not croupy and it does not hype anvil.
sent6 -> int5: if the anvil is not a lobby then that it is not noble and it is invitational is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stonewaller is not croupy and it does not hype anvil is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the safety hypes anvil that it is invitational thing that does not insert township does not hold. sent2: if the urceole does not insert township then the fact that it does not insert up-tick is true. sent3: that the stonewaller hypes safety and it inserts up-tick is not right if it inserts township. sent4: that the safety is not invitational and does not insert up-tick is not correct. sent5: the fact that something is non-croupy thing that does not hype anvil is not right if it does not insert township. sent6: the fact that something is not noble and is invitational does not hold if it is not a lobby. sent7: the stonewaller is not croupy and it does not hype anvil if the safety inserts township. sent8: if the stonewaller does not hype safety the fact that it is a kind of a lobby that does not hype anvil is false. sent9: the fact that the safety is a minivan and it is croupy is not correct. sent10: if the fact that something is invitational but it is not a kind of a lobby is wrong it is not invitational. sent11: if the fact that the safety is invitational is not incorrect then that it is croupy and it does not insert township does not hold. sent12: the safety is invitational if the fact that the stonewaller hypes safety but it does not insert up-tick is not right. sent13: that the safety is invitational but not a kweek is false. sent14: there is nothing such that it is invitational and it is not a lobby. sent15: that something is not a kind of a Stuttgart and is not uneager does not hold if it is not a flatulence. sent16: if something does not insert township that it is a kind of non-croupy thing that hypes anvil is not true. sent17: if the federalist is mortuary the fact that it is a kind of exterior thing that is not a humanist is incorrect. sent18: the fact that something is not an inflection is correct if that it is an inflection but not a gobbledygook is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stonewaller does insert township.; sent10 -> int1: if that that the safety is both invitational and not a lobby is right is not true it is not invitational.; sent14 -> int2: that the safety is both invitational and not a lobby is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the safety is not invitational is not incorrect.; sent5 -> int4: the fact that the stonewaller is non-croupy and it does not hype anvil is not right if it does not insert township.; __UNKNOWN__