there is something such that if it does not formalize typing it is not a kelvin.
sent1: the fact that the nazi is non-biliary is not false. sent2: the quarterback is not a kind of a Berry. sent3: that the coville is not insane hold if the fact that it does not formalize Ki and is a Heloise is not correct. sent4: if the quarterback is not a prebendary but it is a kind of a Manichaeism then it is not a fatness. sent5: that if something is a pickle then the quarterback is not biliary hold. sent6: if the fact that the creep does not own quarterback but it is temperamental does not hold then it is a centrum. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not biliary and it is macroeconomics does not hold. sent8: if the quarterback is not a kind of a Stenocarpus it is not a dated. sent9: the quarterback is not a kind of a prebendary if there is something such that the fact that it is not a fatness and is a kind of a Manichaeism is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the creep is not a Stenocarpus but a fatness does not hold it is a prebendary. sent11: if the fact that the quarterback is not a prebendary and is a Manichaeism is not true then that it is not a kelvin is right. sent12: the creep is not a kind of a Stenocarpus if it is not a bath and it is unfavorable. sent13: if there is something such that that it is both not biliary and macroeconomics is incorrect the creep is not a Stenocarpus. sent14: there exists something such that it does not dismiss and is liberal. sent15: the fact that the creep is not an imitation is true. sent16: there exists something such that it is diffuse. sent17: the creep is not biliary. sent18: something is not biliary but it is macroeconomics. sent19: if that the basophil does not scram hold then it is a Manichaeism. sent20: the creep is macroeconomics. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Stenocarpus is not wrong then that the quarterback does not formalize typing but it is a Stenocarpus is incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the quarterback is not a prebendary but it is a Manichaeism.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the quarterback is not a fatness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quarterback does not formalize typing.; sent7 & sent13 -> int2: the creep is not a Stenocarpus.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a Stenocarpus.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the quarterback does not formalize typing and is a Stenocarpus is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not formalize typing it is not a kelvin. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the nazi is non-biliary is not false. sent2: the quarterback is not a kind of a Berry. sent3: that the coville is not insane hold if the fact that it does not formalize Ki and is a Heloise is not correct. sent4: if the quarterback is not a prebendary but it is a kind of a Manichaeism then it is not a fatness. sent5: that if something is a pickle then the quarterback is not biliary hold. sent6: if the fact that the creep does not own quarterback but it is temperamental does not hold then it is a centrum. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not biliary and it is macroeconomics does not hold. sent8: if the quarterback is not a kind of a Stenocarpus it is not a dated. sent9: the quarterback is not a kind of a prebendary if there is something such that the fact that it is not a fatness and is a kind of a Manichaeism is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the creep is not a Stenocarpus but a fatness does not hold it is a prebendary. sent11: if the fact that the quarterback is not a prebendary and is a Manichaeism is not true then that it is not a kelvin is right. sent12: the creep is not a kind of a Stenocarpus if it is not a bath and it is unfavorable. sent13: if there is something such that that it is both not biliary and macroeconomics is incorrect the creep is not a Stenocarpus. sent14: there exists something such that it does not dismiss and is liberal. sent15: the fact that the creep is not an imitation is true. sent16: there exists something such that it is diffuse. sent17: the creep is not biliary. sent18: something is not biliary but it is macroeconomics. sent19: if that the basophil does not scram hold then it is a Manichaeism. sent20: the creep is macroeconomics. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Stenocarpus is not wrong then that the quarterback does not formalize typing but it is a Stenocarpus is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the quarterback is not a prebendary but it is a Manichaeism.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the quarterback is not a fatness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quarterback does not formalize typing.; sent7 & sent13 -> int2: the creep is not a Stenocarpus.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a Stenocarpus.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the quarterback does not formalize typing and is a Stenocarpus is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__