the dining does not occur if the exposure does not occur.
sent1: that the sheltering bathroom does not occur is triggered by that both the altricialness and the salting occurs. sent2: the altricialness happens. sent3: that both the cornering and the altricialness occurs is brought about by that the salt does not occur. sent4: that the dining does not occur is caused by that the sheltering bathroom does not occur and the exposure does not occur. sent5: the salting occurs. sent6: the consubstantiating occurs.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the altricialness occurs and the salt happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the sheltering bathroom does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exposure does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the sheltering bathroom does not occur and the exposure does not occur.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the dining does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the corner occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the dining does not occur if the exposure does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sheltering bathroom does not occur is triggered by that both the altricialness and the salting occurs. sent2: the altricialness happens. sent3: that both the cornering and the altricialness occurs is brought about by that the salt does not occur. sent4: that the dining does not occur is caused by that the sheltering bathroom does not occur and the exposure does not occur. sent5: the salting occurs. sent6: the consubstantiating occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the altricialness occurs and the salt happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the sheltering bathroom does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exposure does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the sheltering bathroom does not occur and the exposure does not occur.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the dining does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__