the impenetrableness does not occur and the caramelizing does not occur.
sent1: the exhilarating mohair occurs. sent2: that that the impenetrableness does not occur and the caramelizing does not occur is wrong if the exhilarating mohair does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the ushering Churchill happens and the ushering commination does not occur. sent4: the ushering Churchill does not occur if the impenetrableness and the exhilarating mohair occurs. sent5: that the caramelizing and the territorialization occurs is not correct. sent6: if the cholinergicness happens the fact that the force happens but the self-aggrandizement does not occur does not hold. sent7: if that the caramelizing happens and the territorialization happens is false the caramelizing does not occur. sent8: that the ushering lament does not occur triggers either that the palling does not occur or the embowering photometry or both. sent9: the fact that the self-aggrandizement does not occur hold. sent10: if that the force but not the self-aggrandizement happens is not true the ushering commination happens. sent11: the ushering commination does not occur. sent12: that the diverting does not occur yields that the ushering commination and the territorialization occurs. sent13: the anemicness happens. sent14: if the pall does not occur and/or the embowering photometry occurs the diverting does not occur. sent15: that the territorialization occurs results in that the caramelizing happens. sent16: the territorialization does not occur if the ushering commination occurs but the diverting does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impenetrableness happens.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: the impenetrableness and the exhilarating mohair occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ushering Churchill does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the fact that the ushering Churchill happens is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the impenetrableness does not occur is correct.; sent7 & sent5 -> int6: the caramelizing does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the queue does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the impenetrableness does not occur and the caramelizing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the exhilarating mohair occurs. sent2: that that the impenetrableness does not occur and the caramelizing does not occur is wrong if the exhilarating mohair does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the ushering Churchill happens and the ushering commination does not occur. sent4: the ushering Churchill does not occur if the impenetrableness and the exhilarating mohair occurs. sent5: that the caramelizing and the territorialization occurs is not correct. sent6: if the cholinergicness happens the fact that the force happens but the self-aggrandizement does not occur does not hold. sent7: if that the caramelizing happens and the territorialization happens is false the caramelizing does not occur. sent8: that the ushering lament does not occur triggers either that the palling does not occur or the embowering photometry or both. sent9: the fact that the self-aggrandizement does not occur hold. sent10: if that the force but not the self-aggrandizement happens is not true the ushering commination happens. sent11: the ushering commination does not occur. sent12: that the diverting does not occur yields that the ushering commination and the territorialization occurs. sent13: the anemicness happens. sent14: if the pall does not occur and/or the embowering photometry occurs the diverting does not occur. sent15: that the territorialization occurs results in that the caramelizing happens. sent16: the territorialization does not occur if the ushering commination occurs but the diverting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impenetrableness happens.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: the impenetrableness and the exhilarating mohair occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ushering Churchill does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the fact that the ushering Churchill happens is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the impenetrableness does not occur is correct.; sent7 & sent5 -> int6: the caramelizing does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__