the stopper does not occur and the clamatorialness occurs.
sent1: if the lindy does not occur then the Ismailiness does not occur and the gesticulating cloche does not occur. sent2: the fact that not the admixture but the adjudication occurs does not hold if the denying aluminate occurs. sent3: that if the preoccupancy does not occur the fact that that not the gesticulating two-hitter but the stopper happens hold does not hold is not wrong. sent4: the fact that the stopper and the clamatorialness occurs is false if the lindy happens. sent5: that the leave does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: the links does not occur. sent7: that the lindy does not occur leads to that the gesticulating cloche does not occur. sent8: the stoppering does not occur if that not the gesticulating two-hitter but the stoppering happens does not hold. sent9: if the lindy happens the fact that not the stopper but the clamatorialness occurs is false. sent10: the fact that the stoppering and the clamatorialness happens does not hold. sent11: the gesticulating reenlistment happens. sent12: the electronicness happens. sent13: the beckoning par happens. sent14: the odorlessness happens. sent15: the beckoning Ummah does not occur and the particulateness does not occur if the distribution does not occur. sent16: the Ismaili happens. sent17: the historiography happens. sent18: that the gesticulating cloche does not occur is not wrong. sent19: the kabbalism occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lindy does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Ismailiness does not occur and the gesticulating cloche does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the Ismaili does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lindy occurs.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the stoppering does not occur and the clamatorialness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the stopper does not occur and the clamatorialness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lindy does not occur then the Ismailiness does not occur and the gesticulating cloche does not occur. sent2: the fact that not the admixture but the adjudication occurs does not hold if the denying aluminate occurs. sent3: that if the preoccupancy does not occur the fact that that not the gesticulating two-hitter but the stopper happens hold does not hold is not wrong. sent4: the fact that the stopper and the clamatorialness occurs is false if the lindy happens. sent5: that the leave does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: the links does not occur. sent7: that the lindy does not occur leads to that the gesticulating cloche does not occur. sent8: the stoppering does not occur if that not the gesticulating two-hitter but the stoppering happens does not hold. sent9: if the lindy happens the fact that not the stopper but the clamatorialness occurs is false. sent10: the fact that the stoppering and the clamatorialness happens does not hold. sent11: the gesticulating reenlistment happens. sent12: the electronicness happens. sent13: the beckoning par happens. sent14: the odorlessness happens. sent15: the beckoning Ummah does not occur and the particulateness does not occur if the distribution does not occur. sent16: the Ismaili happens. sent17: the historiography happens. sent18: that the gesticulating cloche does not occur is not wrong. sent19: the kabbalism occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lindy does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Ismailiness does not occur and the gesticulating cloche does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the Ismaili does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lindy occurs.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__