the fact that if the Mansi does upgrade then the candle is a poultice is incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that something does not restart and does not qualify ambusher is not correct then it restart. sent2: that the haulm does not indemnify and it does not qualify ambusher is not false. sent3: if the Mansi is an upgrade that does qualify ambusher that it is not Numidian is not false. sent4: the Mansi is a kind of an upgrade and does indemnify. sent5: the roach is a Numidian and it upgrades if there is something such that it indemnifies. sent6: something does indemnify. sent7: that the candle is not a neonatology is wrong if the defaulter is not a baklava and is a neonatology. sent8: The ambusher does qualify Mansi. sent9: that the defaulter is both not a baklava and a neonatology is not false. sent10: the Mansi does qualify ambusher. sent11: the candle appoints and is not a molding. sent12: the objectification does poultice. sent13: the haulm does not indemnify and it is not a kind of a causeway if the Mansi is not a kind of a Numidian. sent14: the candle poultices if the haulm indemnifies but it does not causeway. sent15: the candle poultices if the haulm does not indemnify and it is not a causeway. sent16: the Mansi restarts and it is a causeway if the haulm is not a poultice. sent17: the fact that the haulm does not indemnify is correct. sent18: the haulm is not a poultice if something is a kind of a neonatology that does appoint. sent19: if the Mansi is not a kind of a Numidian then the haulm does not indemnify. sent20: the fact that the fact that the roach does not restart and it does not qualify ambusher is true is wrong if there is something such that it restart.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mansi is an upgrade.; assump1 & sent10 -> int1: the Mansi is an upgrade and it does qualify ambusher.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the Mansi is non-Numidian hold.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the haulm does not indemnify and it is not a causeway.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the candle is a poultice.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the roach is a Numidian and it restarts.
sent6 & sent5 -> int5: the roach is a kind of Numidian thing that is an upgrade.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the roach is a Numidian is right.; sent1 -> int7: the fact that the roach does restart is not false if that it does not restart and does not qualify ambusher is not correct.; sent7 & sent9 -> int8: the candle is a neonatology.; sent11 -> int9: the candle appoints.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the candle is a kind of a neonatology and appoints.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a neonatology and appoints.; int11 & sent18 -> int12: the haulm is not a kind of a poultice.; sent16 & int12 -> int13: the Mansi restarts and it causeways.; int13 -> int14: the Mansi restarts.; int14 -> int15: something does restart.; int15 & sent20 -> int16: the fact that the roach does not restart and it does not qualify ambusher does not hold.; int7 & int16 -> int17: the roach restarts.; int6 & int17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the Mansi does upgrade then the candle is a poultice is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not restart and does not qualify ambusher is not correct then it restart. sent2: that the haulm does not indemnify and it does not qualify ambusher is not false. sent3: if the Mansi is an upgrade that does qualify ambusher that it is not Numidian is not false. sent4: the Mansi is a kind of an upgrade and does indemnify. sent5: the roach is a Numidian and it upgrades if there is something such that it indemnifies. sent6: something does indemnify. sent7: that the candle is not a neonatology is wrong if the defaulter is not a baklava and is a neonatology. sent8: The ambusher does qualify Mansi. sent9: that the defaulter is both not a baklava and a neonatology is not false. sent10: the Mansi does qualify ambusher. sent11: the candle appoints and is not a molding. sent12: the objectification does poultice. sent13: the haulm does not indemnify and it is not a kind of a causeway if the Mansi is not a kind of a Numidian. sent14: the candle poultices if the haulm indemnifies but it does not causeway. sent15: the candle poultices if the haulm does not indemnify and it is not a causeway. sent16: the Mansi restarts and it is a causeway if the haulm is not a poultice. sent17: the fact that the haulm does not indemnify is correct. sent18: the haulm is not a poultice if something is a kind of a neonatology that does appoint. sent19: if the Mansi is not a kind of a Numidian then the haulm does not indemnify. sent20: the fact that the fact that the roach does not restart and it does not qualify ambusher is true is wrong if there is something such that it restart. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mansi is an upgrade.; assump1 & sent10 -> int1: the Mansi is an upgrade and it does qualify ambusher.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the Mansi is non-Numidian hold.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the haulm does not indemnify and it is not a causeway.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the candle is a poultice.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__