the fact that there is something such that if it is not bibliopolic the fact that it is Gauguinesque and it runs exon is false is incorrect.
sent1: that something is allowable and Gauguinesque is not right if that it is not an anchovy hold. sent2: the bilberry does run exon and is a Hancock if it is not epidemiologic. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is orthodox is not incorrect then the fact that it is collegiate thing that compels thermostat is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it is a comment then the fact that it is allowable thing that does compel brigade does not hold. sent5: if the bilberry is not bibliopolic then that it is Gauguinesque and it runs exon is false. sent6: the thermostat is orthodox and runs exon if it does not cohabit.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the hull is not a kind of an anchovy hold the fact that it is allowable and Gauguinesque is wrong.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not bibliopolic the fact that it is Gauguinesque and it runs exon is false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is allowable and Gauguinesque is not right if that it is not an anchovy hold. sent2: the bilberry does run exon and is a Hancock if it is not epidemiologic. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is orthodox is not incorrect then the fact that it is collegiate thing that compels thermostat is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it is a comment then the fact that it is allowable thing that does compel brigade does not hold. sent5: if the bilberry is not bibliopolic then that it is Gauguinesque and it runs exon is false. sent6: the thermostat is orthodox and runs exon if it does not cohabit. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__