that if the fact that the whetstone is not a well and is not an assemblywoman does not hold then that the Garland is not a Haggai hold is not correct.
sent1: that if that something is not a well and it is not an assemblywoman does not hold it is not a opah is not wrong. sent2: the Garland is not an assemblywoman if that the whetstone is both not a opah and not a Appalachian does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the Garland is a Appalachian or it is a opah or both is wrong it is a Haggai. sent4: the fact that the whetstone wells but it is not a kind of an assemblywoman is incorrect. sent5: the assemblywoman does not radio tiptoe. sent6: the Garland is not a Haggai if that the whetstone is not a well but an assemblywoman is not correct. sent7: something is not a Haggai and it is not an urge if it does not radio tiptoe. sent8: if the fact that something is a kind of a Appalachian and/or is a opah is not correct then it is a Haggai. sent9: the Garland is not a Haggai if that the whetstone is not a well is not correct. sent10: that the whetstone is not a opah hold if the fact that it is well hold. sent11: something does not radio cassiterite if that it is not splintery and it does not lead is not true. sent12: if the fact that the whetstone is not a well and not an assemblywoman does not hold the Garland is a Haggai. sent13: a well is not a kind of a opah. sent14: the Garland is not well. sent15: the Garland is not Appalachian if the whetstone is not a opah. sent16: something is not a Haggai if that it is a Appalachian or a opah or both is false. sent17: if the whetstone is not a opah then the fact that either the Garland is a Appalachian or it is a kind of a opah or both is not right. sent18: the whetstone does not radio whetstone. sent19: if that the Garland is a kind of non-Appalachian thing that is not a well is false the whetstone is not a opah. sent20: the Garland is not a Appalachian. sent21: the Garland is not a Haggai if the whetstone is both not a well and not an assemblywoman. sent22: if the fact that the Garland is not a well and is not a kind of an assemblywoman is not true then the fact that it is not a opah is correct.
sent1 -> int1: if that the fact that the whetstone is both not a well and not an assemblywoman is not right is not incorrect it is not a opah.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the whetstone is not a kind of a well and is not a kind of an assemblywoman is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the whetstone is not a opah.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the Garland is a Appalachian or is a opah or both does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: the fact that the Garland is not a Haggai is not wrong if that it either is a kind of a Appalachian or is a opah or both is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Garland is not a kind of a Haggai.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the Garland is not a kind of an assemblywoman.
sent7 -> int6: if the assemblywoman does not radio tiptoe then it is not a Haggai and it does not urge.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the assemblywoman is not a Haggai and it is not a kind of an urge.; int7 -> int8: the assemblywoman is not a Haggai.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a Haggai.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the whetstone is not a well and is not an assemblywoman does not hold then that the Garland is not a Haggai hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that if that something is not a well and it is not an assemblywoman does not hold it is not a opah is not wrong. sent2: the Garland is not an assemblywoman if that the whetstone is both not a opah and not a Appalachian does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the Garland is a Appalachian or it is a opah or both is wrong it is a Haggai. sent4: the fact that the whetstone wells but it is not a kind of an assemblywoman is incorrect. sent5: the assemblywoman does not radio tiptoe. sent6: the Garland is not a Haggai if that the whetstone is not a well but an assemblywoman is not correct. sent7: something is not a Haggai and it is not an urge if it does not radio tiptoe. sent8: if the fact that something is a kind of a Appalachian and/or is a opah is not correct then it is a Haggai. sent9: the Garland is not a Haggai if that the whetstone is not a well is not correct. sent10: that the whetstone is not a opah hold if the fact that it is well hold. sent11: something does not radio cassiterite if that it is not splintery and it does not lead is not true. sent12: if the fact that the whetstone is not a well and not an assemblywoman does not hold the Garland is a Haggai. sent13: a well is not a kind of a opah. sent14: the Garland is not well. sent15: the Garland is not Appalachian if the whetstone is not a opah. sent16: something is not a Haggai if that it is a Appalachian or a opah or both is false. sent17: if the whetstone is not a opah then the fact that either the Garland is a Appalachian or it is a kind of a opah or both is not right. sent18: the whetstone does not radio whetstone. sent19: if that the Garland is a kind of non-Appalachian thing that is not a well is false the whetstone is not a opah. sent20: the Garland is not a Appalachian. sent21: the Garland is not a Haggai if the whetstone is both not a well and not an assemblywoman. sent22: if the fact that the Garland is not a well and is not a kind of an assemblywoman is not true then the fact that it is not a opah is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if that the fact that the whetstone is both not a well and not an assemblywoman is not right is not incorrect it is not a opah.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the whetstone is not a kind of a well and is not a kind of an assemblywoman is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the whetstone is not a opah.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the Garland is a Appalachian or is a opah or both does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: the fact that the Garland is not a Haggai is not wrong if that it either is a kind of a Appalachian or is a opah or both is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Garland is not a kind of a Haggai.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__