the fact that the thenalness and the joining occurs is not right.
sent1: that the exposure does not occur is prevented by the newsreel. sent2: the brutality does not occur if the fact that both the planning and the effecting bakery occurs is not true. sent3: that the dissembling Moscow does not occur leads to that the lumpectomy and the suddenness happens. sent4: that the perforation does not occur leads to the Frostianness. sent5: the fact that not the joining but the armament occurs is false if the exposure does not occur. sent6: that the exposure happens and the armament happens triggers that the lumpectomy does not occur. sent7: the staging happens if that the devoir but not the staging occurs is not right. sent8: the dissembling Moscow does not occur and the staging does not occur if the tripping mousse happens. sent9: that the devoir happens but the staging does not occur does not hold if the screech does not occur. sent10: the fact that the topicalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: if the dissembling Moscow happens the fact that the suddenness happens but the lumpectomy does not occur is incorrect. sent12: that the suddenness does not occur causes that both the joining and the thenalness happens. sent13: that the planning and the effecting bakery occurs is incorrect. sent14: both the devoir and the tripping mousse occurs. sent15: that the brutality happens but the newsreel does not occur does not hold if the staging happens. sent16: the fact that the thenalness occurs hold if the fact that the brutality but not the newsreel happens does not hold. sent17: if the brutality does not occur then the newsreel occurs. sent18: the tripping self-inductance happens and the astrologicalness happens if the rollover does not occur.
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the brutality does not occur.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the newsreel occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the exposure happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the armament occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the exposure occurs and the armament happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the lumpectomy does not occur is true.; sent14 -> int6: the tripping mousse occurs.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the dissembling Moscow does not occur and the staging does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the dissembling Moscow does not occur.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the lumpectomy and the suddenness happens.; int9 -> int10: that the lumpectomy happens hold.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the fact that the armament does not occur is not incorrect.;
both the thenalness and the joining happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the thenalness and the joining occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the exposure does not occur is prevented by the newsreel. sent2: the brutality does not occur if the fact that both the planning and the effecting bakery occurs is not true. sent3: that the dissembling Moscow does not occur leads to that the lumpectomy and the suddenness happens. sent4: that the perforation does not occur leads to the Frostianness. sent5: the fact that not the joining but the armament occurs is false if the exposure does not occur. sent6: that the exposure happens and the armament happens triggers that the lumpectomy does not occur. sent7: the staging happens if that the devoir but not the staging occurs is not right. sent8: the dissembling Moscow does not occur and the staging does not occur if the tripping mousse happens. sent9: that the devoir happens but the staging does not occur does not hold if the screech does not occur. sent10: the fact that the topicalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: if the dissembling Moscow happens the fact that the suddenness happens but the lumpectomy does not occur is incorrect. sent12: that the suddenness does not occur causes that both the joining and the thenalness happens. sent13: that the planning and the effecting bakery occurs is incorrect. sent14: both the devoir and the tripping mousse occurs. sent15: that the brutality happens but the newsreel does not occur does not hold if the staging happens. sent16: the fact that the thenalness occurs hold if the fact that the brutality but not the newsreel happens does not hold. sent17: if the brutality does not occur then the newsreel occurs. sent18: the tripping self-inductance happens and the astrologicalness happens if the rollover does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the brutality does not occur.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the newsreel occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the exposure happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the armament occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the exposure occurs and the armament happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the lumpectomy does not occur is true.; sent14 -> int6: the tripping mousse occurs.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the dissembling Moscow does not occur and the staging does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the dissembling Moscow does not occur.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the lumpectomy and the suddenness happens.; int9 -> int10: that the lumpectomy happens hold.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the fact that the armament does not occur is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__