there is something such that the fact that it does not abscise and does madden uvula is wrong.
sent1: the biont is not awkward. sent2: if something is not a kind of a Sison that it does not abscise and it does madden uvula is not correct. sent3: if either the biont is a neuter or it is unprofitable or both then the section does not strike sperm. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it abscises and it does madden uvula is incorrect. sent5: the biont is not a Decapterus if it abscises. sent6: that something is not a kind of a altoist and it is not a Sison is not right if it does not madden uvula. sent7: if something that does not madden uvula is centroidal then it is not a Decapterus. sent8: the fact that something is not centroidal and overgrows is not right if it is not a Sison. sent9: if the fact that the biont does not overgrow and is not ceremonious is incorrect then it is not centroidal. sent10: if the biont is a kind of a Decapterus it is centroidal. sent11: the lorgnette is not a kind of a landfall and it is not a altoist. sent12: that the biont is both not a criminologist and a Minsk is wrong. sent13: if that the Teutonist is not centroidal and it is not a Sison is not correct it is not ceremonious. sent14: if the section does not strike sperm either it does not abscise or it is not a Decapterus or both. sent15: if the fact that the biont overgrows is correct that it is not centroidal hold. sent16: the biont is a Decapterus. sent17: that the biont is a kind of a altoist and it is centroidal is wrong if it does not madden uvula. sent18: there exists something such that that it is a Decapterus that is a altoist is not correct. sent19: the Teutonist is not a altoist. sent20: if something does not abscise and is not centroidal then it does not overgrow. sent21: the Teutonist is not a kind of a Decapterus and is not blastodermatic. sent22: the fact that the Teutonist is a kind of centroidal thing that is a Sison is incorrect. sent23: something that does not overgrow and is not ceremonious is not a altoist.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the biont does not overgrow and is not ceremonious is not true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the biont is not centroidal.; sent10 & sent16 -> int2: the biont is centroidal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the biont does not overgrow and it is not ceremonious.; sent23 -> int5: the biont is not a altoist if it does not overgrow and it is not ceremonious.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the biont is not a altoist.; sent2 -> int7: if the Teutonist is not a Sison the fact that it does not abscise and it maddens uvula is not true.;
the section is not centroidal.
sent6 -> int8: if the section does not madden uvula that it is not a altoist and it is not a Sison is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it does not abscise and does madden uvula is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the biont is not awkward. sent2: if something is not a kind of a Sison that it does not abscise and it does madden uvula is not correct. sent3: if either the biont is a neuter or it is unprofitable or both then the section does not strike sperm. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it abscises and it does madden uvula is incorrect. sent5: the biont is not a Decapterus if it abscises. sent6: that something is not a kind of a altoist and it is not a Sison is not right if it does not madden uvula. sent7: if something that does not madden uvula is centroidal then it is not a Decapterus. sent8: the fact that something is not centroidal and overgrows is not right if it is not a Sison. sent9: if the fact that the biont does not overgrow and is not ceremonious is incorrect then it is not centroidal. sent10: if the biont is a kind of a Decapterus it is centroidal. sent11: the lorgnette is not a kind of a landfall and it is not a altoist. sent12: that the biont is both not a criminologist and a Minsk is wrong. sent13: if that the Teutonist is not centroidal and it is not a Sison is not correct it is not ceremonious. sent14: if the section does not strike sperm either it does not abscise or it is not a Decapterus or both. sent15: if the fact that the biont overgrows is correct that it is not centroidal hold. sent16: the biont is a Decapterus. sent17: that the biont is a kind of a altoist and it is centroidal is wrong if it does not madden uvula. sent18: there exists something such that that it is a Decapterus that is a altoist is not correct. sent19: the Teutonist is not a altoist. sent20: if something does not abscise and is not centroidal then it does not overgrow. sent21: the Teutonist is not a kind of a Decapterus and is not blastodermatic. sent22: the fact that the Teutonist is a kind of centroidal thing that is a Sison is incorrect. sent23: something that does not overgrow and is not ceremonious is not a altoist. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the biont does not overgrow and is not ceremonious is not true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the biont is not centroidal.; sent10 & sent16 -> int2: the biont is centroidal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the biont does not overgrow and it is not ceremonious.; sent23 -> int5: the biont is not a altoist if it does not overgrow and it is not ceremonious.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the biont is not a altoist.; sent2 -> int7: if the Teutonist is not a Sison the fact that it does not abscise and it maddens uvula is not true.; __UNKNOWN__