that the fact that the cricket does hop jaboncillo and does not bury sportscaster is not correct is not false.
sent1: that the cricket does hop jaboncillo but it does not bury sportscaster is false if the sportscaster hop jaboncillo. sent2: that the scallop does not hop pup and is not normal is incorrect if the Velcro is a P. sent3: if that the scallop does not hop pup and is not normal is not correct it abuses granadillo. sent4: something is bacteroidal and it does abuse phosphate if it does not ladle wonderberry. sent5: the sportscaster does not abuse phosphate. sent6: that the sportscaster ladles wonderberry does not hold if the Iowa does bury Belize and does not ladles wonderberry. sent7: The phosphate does not abuse sportscaster. sent8: if the sportscaster does not abuse phosphate then that it is not a technocrat and does hop jaboncillo is right. sent9: if the fact that the cricket is prosthetics and does not bury sportscaster is false then it is not prosthetics. sent10: the fact that the cricket is prosthetics and does not bury sportscaster is incorrect if it does abuse twenty-three. sent11: if the scallop does abuse granadillo then the Iowa abuses twenty-three. sent12: if that the sportscaster abuses phosphate is true then the cricket does abuses phosphate. sent13: something does bury Belize but it does not ladle wonderberry if that it does abuse twenty-three is right.
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the sportscaster is not a technocrat but it hops jaboncillo.; int1 -> int2: the sportscaster does hop jaboncillo.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the cricket hops jaboncillo but it does not bury sportscaster.
sent4 -> int3: if the sportscaster does not ladle wonderberry then it is a kind of bacteroidal thing that abuses phosphate.; sent13 -> int4: if the Iowa abuses twenty-three then it does bury Belize and does not ladle wonderberry.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the cricket does hop jaboncillo and does not bury sportscaster is not correct is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cricket does hop jaboncillo but it does not bury sportscaster is false if the sportscaster hop jaboncillo. sent2: that the scallop does not hop pup and is not normal is incorrect if the Velcro is a P. sent3: if that the scallop does not hop pup and is not normal is not correct it abuses granadillo. sent4: something is bacteroidal and it does abuse phosphate if it does not ladle wonderberry. sent5: the sportscaster does not abuse phosphate. sent6: that the sportscaster ladles wonderberry does not hold if the Iowa does bury Belize and does not ladles wonderberry. sent7: The phosphate does not abuse sportscaster. sent8: if the sportscaster does not abuse phosphate then that it is not a technocrat and does hop jaboncillo is right. sent9: if the fact that the cricket is prosthetics and does not bury sportscaster is false then it is not prosthetics. sent10: the fact that the cricket is prosthetics and does not bury sportscaster is incorrect if it does abuse twenty-three. sent11: if the scallop does abuse granadillo then the Iowa abuses twenty-three. sent12: if that the sportscaster abuses phosphate is true then the cricket does abuses phosphate. sent13: something does bury Belize but it does not ladle wonderberry if that it does abuse twenty-three is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the sportscaster is not a technocrat but it hops jaboncillo.; int1 -> int2: the sportscaster does hop jaboncillo.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__