the outlet does not occur.
sent1: if that the hawking does not occur and the jarring backpack does not occur is not true then the incursion does not occur. sent2: the output occurs if the hawking does not occur and the jarring backpack does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the emending Afrocarpus happens and the funrun happens does not hold then the urticating symbol does not occur. sent4: if that the dolichocephalicness does not occur is correct that the emending Afrocarpus happens and the funrun happens is incorrect. sent5: the casuisticness occurs and the cyberneticsness occurs if the emending precipitin does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the emending sunburst occurs but the urticating symbol does not occur is not true the funrun does not occur. sent7: not the output but the dolichocephalicness happens. sent8: if the jarring Lodge happens the rubbing does not occur. sent9: if the emending Afrocarpus does not occur the fact that the outlet does not occur hold. sent10: that the firmamentalness does not occur is caused by that the cyberneticsness occurs. sent11: if the fact that the gladdening happens or the emending denier does not occur or both is not correct then the dolichocephalic does not occur. sent12: that the gladdening occurs or the emending denier does not occur or both is not correct if the firmamentalness does not occur. sent13: if the incursion does not occur then the fact that the emending sunburst but not the urticating symbol occurs is not correct. sent14: the outlet is triggered by the incursion. sent15: the firstness happens if the incursion occurs. sent16: if that the urticating symbol does not occur hold the emending sunburst occurs and/or the outputting does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hawking does not occur and the jarring backpack does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the outputting happens.; sent7 -> int2: the output does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hawking does not occur and the jarring backpack does not occur is not correct.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the incursion does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: that the emending sunburst but not the urticating symbol happens is incorrect.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the funrun does not occur.;
the firstness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the outlet does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the hawking does not occur and the jarring backpack does not occur is not true then the incursion does not occur. sent2: the output occurs if the hawking does not occur and the jarring backpack does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the emending Afrocarpus happens and the funrun happens does not hold then the urticating symbol does not occur. sent4: if that the dolichocephalicness does not occur is correct that the emending Afrocarpus happens and the funrun happens is incorrect. sent5: the casuisticness occurs and the cyberneticsness occurs if the emending precipitin does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the emending sunburst occurs but the urticating symbol does not occur is not true the funrun does not occur. sent7: not the output but the dolichocephalicness happens. sent8: if the jarring Lodge happens the rubbing does not occur. sent9: if the emending Afrocarpus does not occur the fact that the outlet does not occur hold. sent10: that the firmamentalness does not occur is caused by that the cyberneticsness occurs. sent11: if the fact that the gladdening happens or the emending denier does not occur or both is not correct then the dolichocephalic does not occur. sent12: that the gladdening occurs or the emending denier does not occur or both is not correct if the firmamentalness does not occur. sent13: if the incursion does not occur then the fact that the emending sunburst but not the urticating symbol occurs is not correct. sent14: the outlet is triggered by the incursion. sent15: the firstness happens if the incursion occurs. sent16: if that the urticating symbol does not occur hold the emending sunburst occurs and/or the outputting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hawking does not occur and the jarring backpack does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the outputting happens.; sent7 -> int2: the output does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hawking does not occur and the jarring backpack does not occur is not correct.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the incursion does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: that the emending sunburst but not the urticating symbol happens is incorrect.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the funrun does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__