that the Icelander is not a kind of an intaglio is not incorrect.
sent1: if that the novillero is not a kind of a Ravel is not wrong that that the biocatalyst is tangible and it is carboniferous is not true hold. sent2: if the Blackburn is a rickey then it is not a Shostakovich. sent3: there exists something such that that it is a georgette and is an incurable does not hold. sent4: that the scyphozoan does consort possible or is not a Ravel or both is false. sent5: if something is not a kind of a rickey it is an intaglio and is a kind of a Havel. sent6: something that is both not a Shostakovich and not an intaglio is not a georgette. sent7: the gomphothere is not a rickey. sent8: the Icelander is not tangible. sent9: if the Icelander is a Havel then that the fact that it is a georgette and incurable hold is not correct. sent10: something is not an intaglio if it is not a kind of a Havel and it is not tangible. sent11: the Blackburn is a rickey if there is something such that the fact that it is a georgette and it is not an incurable is wrong. sent12: the fact that the Icelander is a georgette but it is not an incurable does not hold if it is a Havel. sent13: if that the Blackburn is a kind of a rickey is correct then it is not a Shostakovich but a tetrachloromethane. sent14: if that the scyphozoan does consort possible and/or it is not a kind of a Ravel is not right then the novillero is not a Ravel. sent15: that the Blackburn is a kind of a Shostakovich and it is a kind of a tetrachloromethane does not hold. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not non-carboniferous and not tangible is incorrect that the biocatalyst is a kind of a georgette hold. sent17: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Havel and it is a kind of a Shostakovich is incorrect. sent18: if the Blackburn is not tangible the fact that the Icelander is not a kind of a Shostakovich and is not a tetrachloromethane is false. sent19: that the Blackburn is not a Shostakovich but it is a kind of a tetrachloromethane is not correct if there is something such that that it is carboniferous hold. sent20: the Blackburn is a kind of an intaglio. sent21: the biocatalyst is carboniferous. sent22: if the Blackburn is a tetrachloromethane the fact that it is an intaglio and it is not a Havel is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Icelander is a kind of a Havel.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the Icelander is both a georgette and not an incurable is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a georgette that is not incurable is incorrect.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the Blackburn is a kind of a rickey.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the Blackburn is not a kind of a Shostakovich and is a kind of a tetrachloromethane.; sent21 -> int5: there exists something such that it is carboniferous.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: that the Blackburn is both not a Shostakovich and a tetrachloromethane is not true.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Icelander is not a kind of a Havel.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the Icelander is both not a Havel and not tangible.; sent10 -> int10: that if the Icelander is not the Havel and is not tangible the Icelander is not an intaglio is not false.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the Icelander is an intaglio.
sent5 -> int11: if the Icelander is not a kind of a rickey then it is a kind of an intaglio and is a kind of a Havel.; sent14 & sent4 -> int12: the novillero is not a Ravel.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the biocatalyst is tangible and it is carboniferous is not true.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is tangible and is carboniferous is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Icelander is not a kind of an intaglio is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the novillero is not a kind of a Ravel is not wrong that that the biocatalyst is tangible and it is carboniferous is not true hold. sent2: if the Blackburn is a rickey then it is not a Shostakovich. sent3: there exists something such that that it is a georgette and is an incurable does not hold. sent4: that the scyphozoan does consort possible or is not a Ravel or both is false. sent5: if something is not a kind of a rickey it is an intaglio and is a kind of a Havel. sent6: something that is both not a Shostakovich and not an intaglio is not a georgette. sent7: the gomphothere is not a rickey. sent8: the Icelander is not tangible. sent9: if the Icelander is a Havel then that the fact that it is a georgette and incurable hold is not correct. sent10: something is not an intaglio if it is not a kind of a Havel and it is not tangible. sent11: the Blackburn is a rickey if there is something such that the fact that it is a georgette and it is not an incurable is wrong. sent12: the fact that the Icelander is a georgette but it is not an incurable does not hold if it is a Havel. sent13: if that the Blackburn is a kind of a rickey is correct then it is not a Shostakovich but a tetrachloromethane. sent14: if that the scyphozoan does consort possible and/or it is not a kind of a Ravel is not right then the novillero is not a Ravel. sent15: that the Blackburn is a kind of a Shostakovich and it is a kind of a tetrachloromethane does not hold. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not non-carboniferous and not tangible is incorrect that the biocatalyst is a kind of a georgette hold. sent17: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Havel and it is a kind of a Shostakovich is incorrect. sent18: if the Blackburn is not tangible the fact that the Icelander is not a kind of a Shostakovich and is not a tetrachloromethane is false. sent19: that the Blackburn is not a Shostakovich but it is a kind of a tetrachloromethane is not correct if there is something such that that it is carboniferous hold. sent20: the Blackburn is a kind of an intaglio. sent21: the biocatalyst is carboniferous. sent22: if the Blackburn is a tetrachloromethane the fact that it is an intaglio and it is not a Havel is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Icelander is a kind of a Havel.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the Icelander is both a georgette and not an incurable is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a georgette that is not incurable is incorrect.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the Blackburn is a kind of a rickey.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the Blackburn is not a kind of a Shostakovich and is a kind of a tetrachloromethane.; sent21 -> int5: there exists something such that it is carboniferous.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: that the Blackburn is both not a Shostakovich and a tetrachloromethane is not true.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Icelander is not a kind of a Havel.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the Icelander is both not a Havel and not tangible.; sent10 -> int10: that if the Icelander is not the Havel and is not tangible the Icelander is not an intaglio is not false.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__