that the planter is maxillary and not a serendipity does not hold.
sent1: the di-iodotyrosine is not a Digitaria if it is arbitrable. sent2: that something is a gig and is a Digitaria is not correct if it does not panic Isaiah. sent3: that the Pollock is guttural and does deliver is not right. sent4: the abortionist is not a gig but it panics Isaiah if something is not a kind of a Digitaria. sent5: something delivers and it does panic Isaiah if it is not anthropocentric. sent6: if the Pollock is not a guttural then the clews is not a guttural. sent7: if the fact that the abortionist is anthropocentric hold then the fact that the planter is maxillary and it is a serendipity is not true. sent8: something does unstrap Pollock and/or is not costive. sent9: there exists something such that that it is not a pharmacopoeia does not hold. sent10: something is not a kind of a Digitaria if that it is arbitrable is true. sent11: if the abortionist is anthropocentric the fact that the planter is maxillary but it is not a serendipity is false. sent12: the clews is not a kind of a guttural if that the Pollock is a kind of a guttural that does deliver does not hold. sent13: the fact that that the planter is a kind of maxillary a serendipity does not hold is not false. sent14: if that something is a kind of nonarbitrable thing that unstraps Apterygidae is incorrect then it is not a Digitaria. sent15: if there is something such that it is not a Digitaria then the abortionist does panic Isaiah. sent16: something is nonarbitrable. sent17: that the di-iodotyrosine is arbitrable and it unstraps Apterygidae is false. sent18: that if there is something such that it is arbitrable and it does unstrap Apterygidae the clews is a kind of a guttural hold. sent19: the planter does not panic Isaiah if the clews delivers and panic Isaiah. sent20: if something is not guttural it is maxillary and is not a kind of a serendipity. sent21: the abortionist panics Isaiah. sent22: the di-iodotyrosine is not arbitrable. sent23: if something is not arbitrable and does unstrap Apterygidae the clews is a guttural. sent24: something is anthropocentric if it is not a kind of a gig and panics Isaiah.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the di-iodotyrosine is non-arbitrable thing that does unstrap Apterygidae.; assump1 -> int1: something is a kind of nonarbitrable thing that does unstrap Apterygidae.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the clews is a kind of a guttural.; sent12 & sent3 -> int3: the clews is not a kind of a guttural.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the di-iodotyrosine is not arbitrable and unstraps Apterygidae is wrong.; sent14 -> int6: the di-iodotyrosine is not a Digitaria if the fact that it is not arbitrable and does unstrap Apterygidae is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the di-iodotyrosine is not a Digitaria.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not a Digitaria.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: that the abortionist is not a gig and does panic Isaiah is not false.; sent24 -> int10: if the abortionist is not a gig but it panics Isaiah then it is anthropocentric.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the abortionist is anthropocentric.; int11 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the planter is maxillary thing that is not a serendipity.
sent20 -> int12: if the planter is not a guttural it is maxillary and it is not a kind of a serendipity.; sent2 -> int13: if the planter does not panic Isaiah that it is a kind of a gig and it is a Digitaria is incorrect.; sent5 -> int14: the clews does deliver and does panic Isaiah if it is not anthropocentric.;
$hypothesis$ = that the planter is maxillary and not a serendipity does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the di-iodotyrosine is not a Digitaria if it is arbitrable. sent2: that something is a gig and is a Digitaria is not correct if it does not panic Isaiah. sent3: that the Pollock is guttural and does deliver is not right. sent4: the abortionist is not a gig but it panics Isaiah if something is not a kind of a Digitaria. sent5: something delivers and it does panic Isaiah if it is not anthropocentric. sent6: if the Pollock is not a guttural then the clews is not a guttural. sent7: if the fact that the abortionist is anthropocentric hold then the fact that the planter is maxillary and it is a serendipity is not true. sent8: something does unstrap Pollock and/or is not costive. sent9: there exists something such that that it is not a pharmacopoeia does not hold. sent10: something is not a kind of a Digitaria if that it is arbitrable is true. sent11: if the abortionist is anthropocentric the fact that the planter is maxillary but it is not a serendipity is false. sent12: the clews is not a kind of a guttural if that the Pollock is a kind of a guttural that does deliver does not hold. sent13: the fact that that the planter is a kind of maxillary a serendipity does not hold is not false. sent14: if that something is a kind of nonarbitrable thing that unstraps Apterygidae is incorrect then it is not a Digitaria. sent15: if there is something such that it is not a Digitaria then the abortionist does panic Isaiah. sent16: something is nonarbitrable. sent17: that the di-iodotyrosine is arbitrable and it unstraps Apterygidae is false. sent18: that if there is something such that it is arbitrable and it does unstrap Apterygidae the clews is a kind of a guttural hold. sent19: the planter does not panic Isaiah if the clews delivers and panic Isaiah. sent20: if something is not guttural it is maxillary and is not a kind of a serendipity. sent21: the abortionist panics Isaiah. sent22: the di-iodotyrosine is not arbitrable. sent23: if something is not arbitrable and does unstrap Apterygidae the clews is a guttural. sent24: something is anthropocentric if it is not a kind of a gig and panics Isaiah. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the di-iodotyrosine is non-arbitrable thing that does unstrap Apterygidae.; assump1 -> int1: something is a kind of nonarbitrable thing that does unstrap Apterygidae.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the clews is a kind of a guttural.; sent12 & sent3 -> int3: the clews is not a kind of a guttural.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the di-iodotyrosine is not arbitrable and unstraps Apterygidae is wrong.; sent14 -> int6: the di-iodotyrosine is not a Digitaria if the fact that it is not arbitrable and does unstrap Apterygidae is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the di-iodotyrosine is not a Digitaria.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not a Digitaria.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: that the abortionist is not a gig and does panic Isaiah is not false.; sent24 -> int10: if the abortionist is not a gig but it panics Isaiah then it is anthropocentric.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the abortionist is anthropocentric.; int11 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__