that the toothlessness happens triggers the excavation.
sent1: the volcanism does not occur. sent2: that the excavation happens is brought about by that not the driving but the toothlessness occurs. sent3: the nonfunctionalness does not occur. sent4: that the submerging does not occur or the Parisianness happens or both prevents the drive. sent5: the zoning but not the nonfunctionalness happens. sent6: the submerging or the Parisian or both occurs. sent7: that the sputtering burg does not occur or that the Dipylonness happens or both prevents that the fragmenting lateen-rig occurs. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the upheaving and the self-help occurs is wrong is true the upheaving does not occur. sent9: that the submerging happens is prevented by that the zoning and the nonfunctionalness occurs. sent10: the submerging is prevented by that the zoning occurs but the nonfunctionalness does not occur. sent11: the non-Parisianness causes that the destabilization but not the Albanian occurs. sent12: if the upheaving does not occur then the excavation does not occur or the toothlessness occurs or both. sent13: the archivalness occurs. sent14: the scalding is triggered by that the tampering does not occur and the clanking quadratics happens. sent15: that the fragmenting pulchritude happens is true if the fragmenting Cryptobranchidae does not occur and the detribalization happens.
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the submerging does not occur is correct.; int1 -> int2: either the submerging does not occur or the Parisian happens or both.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the drive does not occur is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toothlessness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: not the drive but the toothlessness happens.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the excavation happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
both the destabilization and the non-Albanianness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the toothlessness happens triggers the excavation. ; $context$ = sent1: the volcanism does not occur. sent2: that the excavation happens is brought about by that not the driving but the toothlessness occurs. sent3: the nonfunctionalness does not occur. sent4: that the submerging does not occur or the Parisianness happens or both prevents the drive. sent5: the zoning but not the nonfunctionalness happens. sent6: the submerging or the Parisian or both occurs. sent7: that the sputtering burg does not occur or that the Dipylonness happens or both prevents that the fragmenting lateen-rig occurs. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the upheaving and the self-help occurs is wrong is true the upheaving does not occur. sent9: that the submerging happens is prevented by that the zoning and the nonfunctionalness occurs. sent10: the submerging is prevented by that the zoning occurs but the nonfunctionalness does not occur. sent11: the non-Parisianness causes that the destabilization but not the Albanian occurs. sent12: if the upheaving does not occur then the excavation does not occur or the toothlessness occurs or both. sent13: the archivalness occurs. sent14: the scalding is triggered by that the tampering does not occur and the clanking quadratics happens. sent15: that the fragmenting pulchritude happens is true if the fragmenting Cryptobranchidae does not occur and the detribalization happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the submerging does not occur is correct.; int1 -> int2: either the submerging does not occur or the Parisian happens or both.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the drive does not occur is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toothlessness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: not the drive but the toothlessness happens.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the excavation happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__