the maundering happens.
sent1: the decisiveness occurs. sent2: the syllogizing arbitration does not occur if both the acoustics and the centroidalness happens. sent3: the non-agraphicness is triggered by that the maritimeness and the shooting happens. sent4: if the liquidity occurs the theming Catalan happens. sent5: the fact that the innumerateness happens is true. sent6: the liquidity occurs and/or the remonstrating boxfish occurs. sent7: the measuring bloodstream occurs and/or the remonstrating linoleum occurs. sent8: if that the quadrupedalness happens hold then the resignation happens. sent9: the moonlessness happens. sent10: the pargeting does not occur. sent11: the suburbanness occurs and the dehiscentness happens. sent12: the gross does not occur if the theming Catalan happens and the maundering happens. sent13: the remonstrating brittleness happens. sent14: the fact that both the remonstrating boxfish and the non-grossness occurs is wrong if the theming Catalan does not occur. sent15: if the winglessness happens and the butt-welding occurs then the fact that the theming Catalan does not occur is correct. sent16: the catalyticness happens. sent17: the grossness happens. sent18: the low-tensionness does not occur. sent19: the theming Catalan does not occur if the winglessness does not occur and the maundering does not occur. sent20: the catkinateness happens or the birth happens or both. sent21: that if the remonstrating boxfish happens that the theming Catalan occurs is not false is not incorrect.
sent6 & sent4 & sent21 -> int1: the theming Catalan occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the maundering happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the theming Catalan occurs and the maundering occurs.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the grossing does not occur.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the backfire happens and the ligating happens.
$hypothesis$ = the maundering happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the decisiveness occurs. sent2: the syllogizing arbitration does not occur if both the acoustics and the centroidalness happens. sent3: the non-agraphicness is triggered by that the maritimeness and the shooting happens. sent4: if the liquidity occurs the theming Catalan happens. sent5: the fact that the innumerateness happens is true. sent6: the liquidity occurs and/or the remonstrating boxfish occurs. sent7: the measuring bloodstream occurs and/or the remonstrating linoleum occurs. sent8: if that the quadrupedalness happens hold then the resignation happens. sent9: the moonlessness happens. sent10: the pargeting does not occur. sent11: the suburbanness occurs and the dehiscentness happens. sent12: the gross does not occur if the theming Catalan happens and the maundering happens. sent13: the remonstrating brittleness happens. sent14: the fact that both the remonstrating boxfish and the non-grossness occurs is wrong if the theming Catalan does not occur. sent15: if the winglessness happens and the butt-welding occurs then the fact that the theming Catalan does not occur is correct. sent16: the catalyticness happens. sent17: the grossness happens. sent18: the low-tensionness does not occur. sent19: the theming Catalan does not occur if the winglessness does not occur and the maundering does not occur. sent20: the catkinateness happens or the birth happens or both. sent21: that if the remonstrating boxfish happens that the theming Catalan occurs is not false is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 & sent21 -> int1: the theming Catalan occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the maundering happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the theming Catalan occurs and the maundering occurs.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the grossing does not occur.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__