the caliche is graceful.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Malawian hold. sent2: something is not experiential and it is not Peruvian if it is not anaclitic. sent3: if something is perineal then the fact that it is not a kind of a undulation and it is comprehensible is not correct. sent4: if the fact that the pesthole is not arborical but it suckles bounder is not true then the amethyst is not perineal. sent5: an incomprehensible thing does not suckle bounder. sent6: something is a tweet if it is not non-Malawian. sent7: the cote is a Malawian if the Land is not Malawian. sent8: the caliche is graceful if the Land is graceful. sent9: there are non-arborical things. sent10: the caliche is non-graceful if there exists something such that that it does tweet or is not non-arborical or both is wrong. sent11: the cote is a Malawian if the Land is incomprehensible. sent12: the parachutist is not comprehensible if the amethyst is comprehensible. sent13: the fact that the amethyst does not suckle bounder is not wrong if either the parachutist is perineal or it is a kind of a undulation or both. sent14: that the fact that the pesthole either is a tweet or is arborical or both is not wrong does not hold if the amethyst is not arborical. sent15: if the Land is not comprehensible the parachutist is a undulation. sent16: the pesthole is not arborical. sent17: if something does not suckle bounder it is not arborical. sent18: if something that demagnetizes wormhole is not aphetic the suit is not anaclitic. sent19: the Land is not comprehensible if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Malawian. sent20: something is a Picidae. sent21: the Land is graceful and is Malawian if the parachutist is incomprehensible. sent22: the Scribe does demagnetize wormhole and is not aphetic if something is a kind of a Picidae. sent23: if the supermodel is not a kind of a tweet then the fact that the pesthole is not arborical but it suckles bounder is incorrect.
sent1 & sent19 -> int1: the Land is not comprehensible.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the parachutist is a undulation.; int2 -> int3: either the parachutist is perineal or it is a undulation or both.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the amethyst does not suckle bounder.; sent17 -> int5: the amethyst is not arborical if it does not suckle bounder.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the amethyst is not arborical.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: that the pesthole is a tweet and/or is arborical does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that either it tweets or it is arborical or both is not correct.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the cote is a kind of a tweet.
sent6 -> int9: if the cote is a kind of a Malawian then it does tweet.; sent3 -> int10: if the parachutist is perineal then the fact that it is both not a undulation and comprehensible is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the caliche is graceful. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Malawian hold. sent2: something is not experiential and it is not Peruvian if it is not anaclitic. sent3: if something is perineal then the fact that it is not a kind of a undulation and it is comprehensible is not correct. sent4: if the fact that the pesthole is not arborical but it suckles bounder is not true then the amethyst is not perineal. sent5: an incomprehensible thing does not suckle bounder. sent6: something is a tweet if it is not non-Malawian. sent7: the cote is a Malawian if the Land is not Malawian. sent8: the caliche is graceful if the Land is graceful. sent9: there are non-arborical things. sent10: the caliche is non-graceful if there exists something such that that it does tweet or is not non-arborical or both is wrong. sent11: the cote is a Malawian if the Land is incomprehensible. sent12: the parachutist is not comprehensible if the amethyst is comprehensible. sent13: the fact that the amethyst does not suckle bounder is not wrong if either the parachutist is perineal or it is a kind of a undulation or both. sent14: that the fact that the pesthole either is a tweet or is arborical or both is not wrong does not hold if the amethyst is not arborical. sent15: if the Land is not comprehensible the parachutist is a undulation. sent16: the pesthole is not arborical. sent17: if something does not suckle bounder it is not arborical. sent18: if something that demagnetizes wormhole is not aphetic the suit is not anaclitic. sent19: the Land is not comprehensible if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Malawian. sent20: something is a Picidae. sent21: the Land is graceful and is Malawian if the parachutist is incomprehensible. sent22: the Scribe does demagnetize wormhole and is not aphetic if something is a kind of a Picidae. sent23: if the supermodel is not a kind of a tweet then the fact that the pesthole is not arborical but it suckles bounder is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent19 -> int1: the Land is not comprehensible.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the parachutist is a undulation.; int2 -> int3: either the parachutist is perineal or it is a undulation or both.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the amethyst does not suckle bounder.; sent17 -> int5: the amethyst is not arborical if it does not suckle bounder.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the amethyst is not arborical.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: that the pesthole is a tweet and/or is arborical does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that either it tweets or it is arborical or both is not correct.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__