the mobcap is not a kind of a cefotaxime.
sent1: everything is not a kind of a ramus. sent2: something does prey neopallium or is proportionate or both. sent3: if the mobcap is not well then that the piston is a kind of a ramus that is not proportionate does not hold. sent4: something is a well if it is a ramus. sent5: the piston does well. sent6: the mobcap is a cefotaxime if the conidiophore is a kind of a cefotaxime. sent7: if the orthoptist does not intensify cause the fact that that the mobcap preys neopallium and is disproportionate is true is false. sent8: that the conidiophore does not ratchet sectionalism and it is non-monolingual does not hold if the fact that the piston is a non-monolingual is not wrong. sent9: the piston is a monolingual if it is not a ramus and wells. sent10: that the conidiophore does intensify cause or it does not ratchet sectionalism or both is right if the orthoptist is proportionate. sent11: if the mobcap is proportionate then it is not a kind of a cefotaxime. sent12: if that the paddle-box does not instruct but it does ratchet Seanad is not correct it does not ratchet Seanad. sent13: the orthoptist does not intensify cause if the fact that the conidiophore does not ratchet sectionalism and it is not a monolingual is not true. sent14: the mobcap is not a cefotaxime if that it preys neopallium and is not proportionate is false. sent15: if there exists something such that that it preys neopallium and it is proportionate is incorrect then the borderland is not proportionate. sent16: the orthoptist is not a kind of a monolingual if the demagogue does not intensify cause and it does not ratchet sectionalism. sent17: the fact that the conidiophore does not ratchet sectionalism but it is a monolingual is false. sent18: the conidiophore is a kind of a cefotaxime or it is a well or both if there is something such that it is a kind of a cefotaxime. sent19: if there exists something such that it is not proportionate the demagogue does not intensify cause and does not ratchet sectionalism. sent20: the fact that something does prey neopallium and is proportionate is not correct if it does not ratchet Seanad. sent21: the fact that the paddle-box does not instruct but it ratchets Seanad is false.
sent1 -> int1: the piston is not a ramus.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the piston is not a ramus and wells is not incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the piston is monolingual.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the conidiophore does not ratchet sectionalism and is not a monolingual is incorrect.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the orthoptist does not intensify cause.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the mobcap does prey neopallium and is not proportionate does not hold.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the mobcap is a well.
sent4 -> int7: if the mobcap is a ramus then it is well.;
$hypothesis$ = the mobcap is not a kind of a cefotaxime. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is not a kind of a ramus. sent2: something does prey neopallium or is proportionate or both. sent3: if the mobcap is not well then that the piston is a kind of a ramus that is not proportionate does not hold. sent4: something is a well if it is a ramus. sent5: the piston does well. sent6: the mobcap is a cefotaxime if the conidiophore is a kind of a cefotaxime. sent7: if the orthoptist does not intensify cause the fact that that the mobcap preys neopallium and is disproportionate is true is false. sent8: that the conidiophore does not ratchet sectionalism and it is non-monolingual does not hold if the fact that the piston is a non-monolingual is not wrong. sent9: the piston is a monolingual if it is not a ramus and wells. sent10: that the conidiophore does intensify cause or it does not ratchet sectionalism or both is right if the orthoptist is proportionate. sent11: if the mobcap is proportionate then it is not a kind of a cefotaxime. sent12: if that the paddle-box does not instruct but it does ratchet Seanad is not correct it does not ratchet Seanad. sent13: the orthoptist does not intensify cause if the fact that the conidiophore does not ratchet sectionalism and it is not a monolingual is not true. sent14: the mobcap is not a cefotaxime if that it preys neopallium and is not proportionate is false. sent15: if there exists something such that that it preys neopallium and it is proportionate is incorrect then the borderland is not proportionate. sent16: the orthoptist is not a kind of a monolingual if the demagogue does not intensify cause and it does not ratchet sectionalism. sent17: the fact that the conidiophore does not ratchet sectionalism but it is a monolingual is false. sent18: the conidiophore is a kind of a cefotaxime or it is a well or both if there is something such that it is a kind of a cefotaxime. sent19: if there exists something such that it is not proportionate the demagogue does not intensify cause and does not ratchet sectionalism. sent20: the fact that something does prey neopallium and is proportionate is not correct if it does not ratchet Seanad. sent21: the fact that the paddle-box does not instruct but it ratchets Seanad is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the piston is not a ramus.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the piston is not a ramus and wells is not incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the piston is monolingual.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the conidiophore does not ratchet sectionalism and is not a monolingual is incorrect.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the orthoptist does not intensify cause.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the mobcap does prey neopallium and is not proportionate does not hold.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__