the muscovite is a epicurism.
sent1: that the muscovite is not a diverseness but it is endoparasitic is false. sent2: if something is a rune it is a epicurism. sent3: there is nothing that is not a bargaining but Kiplingesque. sent4: the fact that that the muscovite is a bargaining and it is Kiplingesque is not incorrect is incorrect. sent5: if the fact that something is not a bargaining but it is Kiplingesque does not hold then it is not a epicurism.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the muscovite does not bargain but it is Kiplingesque is not correct.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the muscovite does not bargain and is not non-Kiplingesque is wrong then the fact that it is not a kind of a epicurism is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the muscovite is a kind of a epicurism.
sent2 -> int3: the muscovite is a epicurism if it is a rune.;
$hypothesis$ = the muscovite is a epicurism. ; $context$ = sent1: that the muscovite is not a diverseness but it is endoparasitic is false. sent2: if something is a rune it is a epicurism. sent3: there is nothing that is not a bargaining but Kiplingesque. sent4: the fact that that the muscovite is a bargaining and it is Kiplingesque is not incorrect is incorrect. sent5: if the fact that something is not a bargaining but it is Kiplingesque does not hold then it is not a epicurism. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the muscovite does not bargain but it is Kiplingesque is not correct.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the muscovite does not bargain and is not non-Kiplingesque is wrong then the fact that it is not a kind of a epicurism is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__