there exists something such that if the fact that it is not jittery is correct that that it is not a Sioux and it is ritualistic is not false does not hold.
sent1: if the heron is not a kind of a Angola then that it is jittery and does jellify pocket is not correct. sent2: that the heron is not a Sioux but it is ritualistic does not hold if it is not jittery. sent3: if the heron does preempt atom then that it is not a sax but ritualistic is not correct. sent4: the fact that the amphitheater is both not rhythmical and a Sioux is incorrect if it is not a Angola. sent5: if the heron does not exceed amphitheater the fact that it is non-ritualistic and it is a Venezuela is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the heron is a Sioux and ritualistic is not true if it is not jittery. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a dogging that that it is a dripstone and it is a kind of a Hawaiian is not incorrect does not hold. sent8: the fact that the heron is not a stuffiness but it is a beacon is wrong if it is feudatory. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not jittery then it is not a Sioux and it is ritualistic. sent10: if the heron is jittery that it is both not a Sioux and ritualistic does not hold. sent11: if the heron is not jittery then the fact that it does not thrive and it is a Galahad is not correct. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not jittery hold the fact that it is a Sioux and it is ritualistic does not hold. sent13: the heron is both not a Sioux and ritualistic if that it is non-jittery is true. sent14: there is something such that if it is jittery then that it is not a Sioux but ritualistic is not right. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not prepositional is true it is a kind of non-ventricular a blur.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not jittery is correct that that it is not a Sioux and it is ritualistic is not false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the heron is not a kind of a Angola then that it is jittery and does jellify pocket is not correct. sent2: that the heron is not a Sioux but it is ritualistic does not hold if it is not jittery. sent3: if the heron does preempt atom then that it is not a sax but ritualistic is not correct. sent4: the fact that the amphitheater is both not rhythmical and a Sioux is incorrect if it is not a Angola. sent5: if the heron does not exceed amphitheater the fact that it is non-ritualistic and it is a Venezuela is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the heron is a Sioux and ritualistic is not true if it is not jittery. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a dogging that that it is a dripstone and it is a kind of a Hawaiian is not incorrect does not hold. sent8: the fact that the heron is not a stuffiness but it is a beacon is wrong if it is feudatory. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not jittery then it is not a Sioux and it is ritualistic. sent10: if the heron is jittery that it is both not a Sioux and ritualistic does not hold. sent11: if the heron is not jittery then the fact that it does not thrive and it is a Galahad is not correct. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not jittery hold the fact that it is a Sioux and it is ritualistic does not hold. sent13: the heron is both not a Sioux and ritualistic if that it is non-jittery is true. sent14: there is something such that if it is jittery then that it is not a Sioux but ritualistic is not right. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not prepositional is true it is a kind of non-ventricular a blur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__