there is something such that if it is harsh then it is not a conventioneer.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a hagiographer then it does subrogate actuality. sent2: there exists something such that if it besots winery it is not precancerous. sent3: something does subrogate actuality if it bundles tape. sent4: if the rarity is caudate then it is a conventioneer. sent5: if the rarity is a conventioneer then it is not gastrointestinal. sent6: if something is harsh then the fact that it is not a conventioneer hold. sent7: there is something such that if it does besot treason then it is unconstitutional. sent8: if the rarity is harsh then it is a kind of a conventioneer. sent9: there exists something such that if it is syllogistic it besots fame. sent10: the rarity is not a conventioneer if it is a kind of a Polynesian. sent11: if something is harsh then the fact that it does not besot birthroot is not incorrect. sent12: the fact that there exists something such that if it bundles instroke then it is not a cling is not incorrect. sent13: the rarity is a kind of a dentist if that it is Alsatian hold. sent14: the nomad is not enthusiastic if it is harsh. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is harsh is not incorrect then it is a kind of a conventioneer. sent16: if the rarity is a kind of a glider it is a conventioneer. sent17: something that is harsh is a kind of a conventioneer. sent18: if something is not non-Polynesian it is legless. sent19: something is not sincere if it subrogates curiousness. sent20: there exists something such that if it is an energizer then it is not a Rosicrucian.
sent6 -> int1: if that the rarity is harsh is not false then it is not a kind of a conventioneer.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the sowbane is harsh it does not besot birthroot.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is harsh then it is not a conventioneer. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a hagiographer then it does subrogate actuality. sent2: there exists something such that if it besots winery it is not precancerous. sent3: something does subrogate actuality if it bundles tape. sent4: if the rarity is caudate then it is a conventioneer. sent5: if the rarity is a conventioneer then it is not gastrointestinal. sent6: if something is harsh then the fact that it is not a conventioneer hold. sent7: there is something such that if it does besot treason then it is unconstitutional. sent8: if the rarity is harsh then it is a kind of a conventioneer. sent9: there exists something such that if it is syllogistic it besots fame. sent10: the rarity is not a conventioneer if it is a kind of a Polynesian. sent11: if something is harsh then the fact that it does not besot birthroot is not incorrect. sent12: the fact that there exists something such that if it bundles instroke then it is not a cling is not incorrect. sent13: the rarity is a kind of a dentist if that it is Alsatian hold. sent14: the nomad is not enthusiastic if it is harsh. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is harsh is not incorrect then it is a kind of a conventioneer. sent16: if the rarity is a kind of a glider it is a conventioneer. sent17: something that is harsh is a kind of a conventioneer. sent18: if something is not non-Polynesian it is legless. sent19: something is not sincere if it subrogates curiousness. sent20: there exists something such that if it is an energizer then it is not a Rosicrucian. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if that the rarity is harsh is not false then it is not a kind of a conventioneer.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__