the typist does not prepose Edwardian.
sent1: everything is not a novelty and does kayak. sent2: if the Eskimo is cheerful then the Garland is not a left-hander. sent3: if the fact that the cirque is not a novelty but it is a kayak is correct then the Eskimo is cheerful. sent4: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a left-hander is right. sent5: the typist preposes Edwardian if the Eskimo preposes Edwardian. sent6: if the cirque is a novelty that kayaks then the fact that the Eskimo is not non-cheerful is not false. sent7: the cirque is not a novelty. sent8: if a appetitive thing is not a left-hander then the typist does not prepose Edwardian. sent9: the Garland is not a kind of a left-hander. sent10: if there exists something such that it is appetitive and it is a left-hander that the typist does not prepose Edwardian is true.
sent1 -> int1: the cirque is not a novelty but a kayak.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the Eskimo is cheerful.;
the typist does prepose Edwardian.
$hypothesis$ = the typist does not prepose Edwardian. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is not a novelty and does kayak. sent2: if the Eskimo is cheerful then the Garland is not a left-hander. sent3: if the fact that the cirque is not a novelty but it is a kayak is correct then the Eskimo is cheerful. sent4: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a left-hander is right. sent5: the typist preposes Edwardian if the Eskimo preposes Edwardian. sent6: if the cirque is a novelty that kayaks then the fact that the Eskimo is not non-cheerful is not false. sent7: the cirque is not a novelty. sent8: if a appetitive thing is not a left-hander then the typist does not prepose Edwardian. sent9: the Garland is not a kind of a left-hander. sent10: if there exists something such that it is appetitive and it is a left-hander that the typist does not prepose Edwardian is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the cirque is not a novelty but a kayak.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the Eskimo is cheerful.; __UNKNOWN__