that if the dogmatizing onychosis happens then the fact that the binocularsness occurs is true is not correct.
sent1: that the scuffing occurs is caused by the dogmatizing onychosis. sent2: that the binocularsness occurs is right if the prosodicness happens. sent3: the binocularsness happens if the fact that the non-prosodicness and the trafficking canary happens is false. sent4: that if that the scuffing happens is not wrong the fact that both the prosodicness and the trafficking canary occurs is incorrect is not wrong. sent5: the whitewash happens and the dogmatizing onychosis happens if the scuff does not occur. sent6: the binocularsness does not occur if the bating does not occur and the unwholesomeness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that not the prescription but the quackery happens is not right the radicalizing happens. sent8: if the scuffing happens that that the non-prosodicness and the trafficking canary happens is incorrect is not false. sent9: if the irrelevantness does not occur the bating does not occur and the Montserratian does not occur. sent10: the fact that the prosodicness and the trafficking canary happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dogmatizing onychosis occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the scuffing happens.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: that the prosodicness does not occur but the trafficking canary happens is not right.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the binocularsness happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the whitewashing occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that if the dogmatizing onychosis happens then the fact that the binocularsness occurs is true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the scuffing occurs is caused by the dogmatizing onychosis. sent2: that the binocularsness occurs is right if the prosodicness happens. sent3: the binocularsness happens if the fact that the non-prosodicness and the trafficking canary happens is false. sent4: that if that the scuffing happens is not wrong the fact that both the prosodicness and the trafficking canary occurs is incorrect is not wrong. sent5: the whitewash happens and the dogmatizing onychosis happens if the scuff does not occur. sent6: the binocularsness does not occur if the bating does not occur and the unwholesomeness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that not the prescription but the quackery happens is not right the radicalizing happens. sent8: if the scuffing happens that that the non-prosodicness and the trafficking canary happens is incorrect is not false. sent9: if the irrelevantness does not occur the bating does not occur and the Montserratian does not occur. sent10: the fact that the prosodicness and the trafficking canary happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dogmatizing onychosis occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the scuffing happens.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: that the prosodicness does not occur but the trafficking canary happens is not right.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the binocularsness happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__