the threonine is a kind of a snakewood.
sent1: if something is a proprionamide then that either it does not stage or it is not a snakewood or both does not hold. sent2: something does communicate costermonger if it is a soft-shoe. sent3: the threonine is a shamefacedness and/or does not splay horsebean. sent4: the threonine is a snakewood and/or does control. sent5: the fieldfare is proportionate and it does communicate Polyangium. sent6: if the meatloaf is not a olivenite the earner is not a olivenite. sent7: something is transpolar but it is not a kind of a unneighborliness if it is a kind of a philately. sent8: the fieldfare is a kind of a soft-shoe and it is pituitary. sent9: if that the threonine is not a snakewood hold the fact that it does splay horsebean is not wrong. sent10: if something is not biological then the fact that it is a CER and/or it is not ink-jet is not right. sent11: the fact that the threonine is not a proprionamide but it stages does not hold if the earner is not a olivenite. sent12: if that the spadefoot does not communicate Polyangium is right the fact that either it is stemless or it does mass-produce wood or both does not hold. sent13: that if the Mogul is not the shim the Mogul splays horsebean is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the fact that either something is a kind of a shamefacedness or it does not splay horsebean or both is true is not right if it is not a snakewood. sent15: if either something is a Lorre or it is not a kind of a Pyrrhus or both then it is not a olivenite. sent16: if there is something such that that either it is not a staged or it is not a snakewood or both is not true the wood is a shamefacedness. sent17: if the fact that something is not a proprionamide and does stage is wrong then it is not a kind of a snakewood. sent18: the threonine is prepositional and/or it is not a snakewood. sent19: the spadefoot does not communicate Polyangium if the fieldfare communicates costermonger and it communicate Polyangium. sent20: the meatloaf is not a Pyrrhus if the allomorph is not a soldier or it is not a unneighborliness or both.
sent14 -> int1: that the threonine is a kind of a shamefacedness and/or it does not splay horsebean is incorrect if it is not a snakewood.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the threonine is not a kind of a snakewood.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the threonine is a kind of a shamefacedness and/or it does not splay horsebean is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the threonine is not a snakewood.
sent17 -> int4: the threonine is not a kind of a snakewood if the fact that it is not a proprionamide and it does stage is false.; sent15 -> int5: if the meatloaf is either a Lorre or not a Pyrrhus or both it is not a olivenite.; sent7 -> int6: if the allomorph is a kind of a philately then it is transpolar but not a unneighborliness.; sent2 -> int7: the fieldfare communicates costermonger if it is a kind of a soft-shoe.; sent8 -> int8: the fieldfare is a kind of a soft-shoe.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fieldfare does communicate costermonger.; sent5 -> int10: the fieldfare does communicate Polyangium.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fieldfare does communicate costermonger and does communicate Polyangium.; sent19 & int11 -> int12: the spadefoot does not communicate Polyangium.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: that the spadefoot is stemless and/or does mass-produce wood is not correct.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is stemless or does mass-produce wood or both does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the threonine is a kind of a snakewood. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a proprionamide then that either it does not stage or it is not a snakewood or both does not hold. sent2: something does communicate costermonger if it is a soft-shoe. sent3: the threonine is a shamefacedness and/or does not splay horsebean. sent4: the threonine is a snakewood and/or does control. sent5: the fieldfare is proportionate and it does communicate Polyangium. sent6: if the meatloaf is not a olivenite the earner is not a olivenite. sent7: something is transpolar but it is not a kind of a unneighborliness if it is a kind of a philately. sent8: the fieldfare is a kind of a soft-shoe and it is pituitary. sent9: if that the threonine is not a snakewood hold the fact that it does splay horsebean is not wrong. sent10: if something is not biological then the fact that it is a CER and/or it is not ink-jet is not right. sent11: the fact that the threonine is not a proprionamide but it stages does not hold if the earner is not a olivenite. sent12: if that the spadefoot does not communicate Polyangium is right the fact that either it is stemless or it does mass-produce wood or both does not hold. sent13: that if the Mogul is not the shim the Mogul splays horsebean is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the fact that either something is a kind of a shamefacedness or it does not splay horsebean or both is true is not right if it is not a snakewood. sent15: if either something is a Lorre or it is not a kind of a Pyrrhus or both then it is not a olivenite. sent16: if there is something such that that either it is not a staged or it is not a snakewood or both is not true the wood is a shamefacedness. sent17: if the fact that something is not a proprionamide and does stage is wrong then it is not a kind of a snakewood. sent18: the threonine is prepositional and/or it is not a snakewood. sent19: the spadefoot does not communicate Polyangium if the fieldfare communicates costermonger and it communicate Polyangium. sent20: the meatloaf is not a Pyrrhus if the allomorph is not a soldier or it is not a unneighborliness or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: that the threonine is a kind of a shamefacedness and/or it does not splay horsebean is incorrect if it is not a snakewood.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the threonine is not a kind of a snakewood.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the threonine is a kind of a shamefacedness and/or it does not splay horsebean is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__