the fact that the obsolescence is not cursorial is correct.
sent1: that the twiddler does not log yip and does not log Russian is incorrect if the planation is campanulate. sent2: if the twiddler logs Russian it is not cursorial. sent3: if that something is not a patisserie or is not a decline or both is incorrect it is not cursorial. sent4: that if the fact that the planation is a kind of a decline is not correct then the obsolescence is a compaction and is not non-campanulate hold. sent5: the planation is a compaction. sent6: the fact that if the fact that something is digestive is not false then the fact that it is not a patisserie and/or it is not a decline does not hold is true. sent7: the fact that the planation is campanulate is not incorrect. sent8: something is not cursorial if it logs Russian. sent9: the whelk is not incautious. sent10: if the twiddler is not cursorial then the obsolescence is a compaction and it is cursorial. sent11: if that something does not log yip and does not log Russian is not correct it is not cursorial. sent12: if the whelk is not incautious then it is a kind of a patisserie that is a kind of a digestive.
sent11 -> int1: if that the twiddler does not log yip and it does not log Russian is not true the fact that it is not cursorial is right.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: that the twiddler does not log yip and it does not log Russian is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the twiddler is not cursorial.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the obsolescence is a compaction and it is cursorial.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the obsolescence is not cursorial is right.
sent12 & sent9 -> int5: the whelk is a kind of a patisserie and it is a kind of a digestive.; int5 -> int6: the whelk is a patisserie.; int6 -> int7: something is a patisserie.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the obsolescence is not cursorial is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the twiddler does not log yip and does not log Russian is incorrect if the planation is campanulate. sent2: if the twiddler logs Russian it is not cursorial. sent3: if that something is not a patisserie or is not a decline or both is incorrect it is not cursorial. sent4: that if the fact that the planation is a kind of a decline is not correct then the obsolescence is a compaction and is not non-campanulate hold. sent5: the planation is a compaction. sent6: the fact that if the fact that something is digestive is not false then the fact that it is not a patisserie and/or it is not a decline does not hold is true. sent7: the fact that the planation is campanulate is not incorrect. sent8: something is not cursorial if it logs Russian. sent9: the whelk is not incautious. sent10: if the twiddler is not cursorial then the obsolescence is a compaction and it is cursorial. sent11: if that something does not log yip and does not log Russian is not correct it is not cursorial. sent12: if the whelk is not incautious then it is a kind of a patisserie that is a kind of a digestive. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if that the twiddler does not log yip and it does not log Russian is not true the fact that it is not cursorial is right.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: that the twiddler does not log yip and it does not log Russian is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the twiddler is not cursorial.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the obsolescence is a compaction and it is cursorial.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__