the hyssop bawls hyssop.
sent1: if that something is not a Conrad and/or is a antifeminist is wrong it masks trousseau. sent2: the graphite is not a antifeminist if the acquirer is not a kind of a territorial. sent3: if the fact that something is a kind of territorial thing that is not a fit is false it is not phagocytic. sent4: the acquirer is not a territorial. sent5: something is pediatric if it does mask trousseau. sent6: if that something is pediatric and it masks trousseau is wrong the fact that it does not bawl hyssop is true. sent7: if the fact that the acquirer is not a kind of a territorial is true the fact that the graphite is not a kind of a Conrad or it is a antifeminist or both is false. sent8: the hyssop bawls hyssop if the calcium fits. sent9: if the fact that the graphite is pediatric is correct it is phagocytic. sent10: if the graphite is phagocytic then the calcium is a kind of a fit. sent11: something is a kind of a malapropism if it is a kind of a antifeminist.
sent1 -> int1: the graphite masks trousseau if the fact that it either is not a kind of a Conrad or is a antifeminist or both is wrong.; sent7 & sent4 -> int2: that the graphite is not a kind of a Conrad and/or it is a kind of a antifeminist is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the graphite masks trousseau.; sent5 -> int4: if the graphite masks trousseau it is pediatric.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the graphite is pediatric.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the graphite is phagocytic.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the calcium is a fit.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
if the graphite is a antifeminist it is a kind of a malapropism.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the hyssop bawls hyssop. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a Conrad and/or is a antifeminist is wrong it masks trousseau. sent2: the graphite is not a antifeminist if the acquirer is not a kind of a territorial. sent3: if the fact that something is a kind of territorial thing that is not a fit is false it is not phagocytic. sent4: the acquirer is not a territorial. sent5: something is pediatric if it does mask trousseau. sent6: if that something is pediatric and it masks trousseau is wrong the fact that it does not bawl hyssop is true. sent7: if the fact that the acquirer is not a kind of a territorial is true the fact that the graphite is not a kind of a Conrad or it is a antifeminist or both is false. sent8: the hyssop bawls hyssop if the calcium fits. sent9: if the fact that the graphite is pediatric is correct it is phagocytic. sent10: if the graphite is phagocytic then the calcium is a kind of a fit. sent11: something is a kind of a malapropism if it is a kind of a antifeminist. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the graphite masks trousseau if the fact that it either is not a kind of a Conrad or is a antifeminist or both is wrong.; sent7 & sent4 -> int2: that the graphite is not a kind of a Conrad and/or it is a kind of a antifeminist is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the graphite masks trousseau.; sent5 -> int4: if the graphite masks trousseau it is pediatric.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the graphite is pediatric.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the graphite is phagocytic.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the calcium is a fit.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__