the fact that the metaproterenol either is not serious or does sample upsetter or both is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that it does not perceive cronyism. sent2: something does not exalt rust if that it does not exalt Faulkner and it does exalt rust is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the hollandaise does not sever or it is serious or both is wrong. sent4: something is a Pilosella. sent5: the metaproterenol is serious. sent6: there is something such that it is not a Pilosella. sent7: something is not a logomachy or it is a kind of a bankruptcy or both if it does not exalt spin. sent8: that the rust exalts spin and is non-rhizoidal does not hold if there is something such that it does not perceive cronyism. sent9: there exists something such that it does not sample upsetter. sent10: if something is not a kind of a logomachy and/or it is a bankruptcy it is not a logomachy. sent11: something that is a kind of a Pilosella either is not serious or samples upsetter or both. sent12: the metaproterenol is a Pilosella if the vestry turtles. sent13: if there is something such that it is not a Pilosella the fact that the metaproterenol is not serious and/or it does sample upsetter is not right. sent14: the laminate does not exalt rust if that that the poncho does not exalt gaffe but it exalt rust is wrong hold. sent15: the metaproterenol is serious if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Pilosella. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is serious is not correct. sent17: if something does not exalt rust then that the poncho does not exalt gaffe but it does exalt rust is not true. sent18: if the metaproterenol is a Pilosella that the sleuth is not cubic and/or it is a kind of a sorrow is wrong. sent19: something does not exalt spin if that it does exalt spin and it is not rhizoidal is false. sent20: if the fact that the laminate does not exalt rust is not false the vestry is a kind of a turtle and/or is a kind of a Benny. sent21: that that something does not exalt Faulkner and does exalt rust is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a logomachy is correct is not wrong.
sent6 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
either the metaproterenol is not serious or it does sample upsetter or both.
sent11 -> int1: the metaproterenol is not serious and/or it samples upsetter if it is a Pilosella.; sent2 -> int2: if that the rust does not exalt Faulkner and does exalt rust is false then it does not exalt rust.; sent21 -> int3: if the rust is not a logomachy the fact that it does not exalt Faulkner and exalts rust is not right.; sent10 -> int4: if either the rust is not a logomachy or it is a kind of a bankruptcy or both the fact that it is not a kind of a logomachy is correct.; sent7 -> int5: the rust is not a kind of a logomachy and/or it is a bankruptcy if it does not exalt spin.; sent19 -> int6: the rust does not exalt spin if the fact that it exalt spin and is not rhizoidal does not hold.; sent1 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the rust does exalt spin and is not rhizoidal does not hold hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the rust does not exalt spin.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the rust is not a logomachy and/or is a bankruptcy.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the rust is not a logomachy.; int3 & int10 -> int11: that the rust does not exalt Faulkner but it exalts rust does not hold.; int2 & int11 -> int12: the rust does not exalt rust.; int12 -> int13: something does not exalt rust.; int13 & sent17 -> int14: the fact that the poncho does not exalt gaffe and does exalt rust is not correct.; sent14 & int14 -> int15: the laminate does not exalt rust.; sent20 & int15 -> int16: the vestry is a turtle or it is a Benny or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the metaproterenol either is not serious or does sample upsetter or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does not perceive cronyism. sent2: something does not exalt rust if that it does not exalt Faulkner and it does exalt rust is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the hollandaise does not sever or it is serious or both is wrong. sent4: something is a Pilosella. sent5: the metaproterenol is serious. sent6: there is something such that it is not a Pilosella. sent7: something is not a logomachy or it is a kind of a bankruptcy or both if it does not exalt spin. sent8: that the rust exalts spin and is non-rhizoidal does not hold if there is something such that it does not perceive cronyism. sent9: there exists something such that it does not sample upsetter. sent10: if something is not a kind of a logomachy and/or it is a bankruptcy it is not a logomachy. sent11: something that is a kind of a Pilosella either is not serious or samples upsetter or both. sent12: the metaproterenol is a Pilosella if the vestry turtles. sent13: if there is something such that it is not a Pilosella the fact that the metaproterenol is not serious and/or it does sample upsetter is not right. sent14: the laminate does not exalt rust if that that the poncho does not exalt gaffe but it exalt rust is wrong hold. sent15: the metaproterenol is serious if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Pilosella. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is serious is not correct. sent17: if something does not exalt rust then that the poncho does not exalt gaffe but it does exalt rust is not true. sent18: if the metaproterenol is a Pilosella that the sleuth is not cubic and/or it is a kind of a sorrow is wrong. sent19: something does not exalt spin if that it does exalt spin and it is not rhizoidal is false. sent20: if the fact that the laminate does not exalt rust is not false the vestry is a kind of a turtle and/or is a kind of a Benny. sent21: that that something does not exalt Faulkner and does exalt rust is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a logomachy is correct is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__