the fact that the flashlight is both glycogenic and Union is incorrect.
sent1: if the flashlight is a Newtonian it is glycogenic. sent2: the flashlight is criminological and it is Union. sent3: something is an outfitted and it is a International if it does not desecrate fruition. sent4: the fact that the lining does not untune disinfection and desecrates fruition is wrong. sent5: that the corrosive is an outfitted that scouts is not right. sent6: if the lining is an outfitted then the termination is a scout. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is an outfitted and it scouts is not true the chronicler does not untune Sesamum. sent8: the aerospace is criminological. sent9: the flashlight is a Newtonian. sent10: the puddingwife is both a Newtonian and glycogenic if the flashlight is not Union. sent11: the flashlight is criminological. sent12: if the termination is a kind of a scout the fact that the flashlight is not criminological and does not untune Sesamum does not hold. sent13: if the fact that something does not untune disinfection but it does desecrate fruition does not hold it does not desecrate fruition. sent14: if the lining is a Newtonian then the termination is not a Union.
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the flashlight is glycogenic.; sent2 -> int2: the flashlight is a kind of a Union.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the puddingwife is Newtonian.
sent3 -> int3: if the lining does not desecrate fruition then it is an outfitted and is a International.; sent13 -> int4: the fact that the lining does not desecrate fruition if the fact that that that the lining does not untune disinfection but it desecrate fruition hold does not hold is right is right.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the lining does not desecrate fruition.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the lining is a kind of an outfitted and it is a kind of a International.; int6 -> int7: the lining is an outfitted.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the termination does scout.; sent12 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the flashlight is not criminological and does not untune Sesamum is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the flashlight is both glycogenic and Union is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flashlight is a Newtonian it is glycogenic. sent2: the flashlight is criminological and it is Union. sent3: something is an outfitted and it is a International if it does not desecrate fruition. sent4: the fact that the lining does not untune disinfection and desecrates fruition is wrong. sent5: that the corrosive is an outfitted that scouts is not right. sent6: if the lining is an outfitted then the termination is a scout. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is an outfitted and it scouts is not true the chronicler does not untune Sesamum. sent8: the aerospace is criminological. sent9: the flashlight is a Newtonian. sent10: the puddingwife is both a Newtonian and glycogenic if the flashlight is not Union. sent11: the flashlight is criminological. sent12: if the termination is a kind of a scout the fact that the flashlight is not criminological and does not untune Sesamum does not hold. sent13: if the fact that something does not untune disinfection but it does desecrate fruition does not hold it does not desecrate fruition. sent14: if the lining is a Newtonian then the termination is not a Union. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the flashlight is glycogenic.; sent2 -> int2: the flashlight is a kind of a Union.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__