the bareboat does not pair baroreceptor.
sent1: everything is a chanfron and it is a thesaurus. sent2: if there is something such that it is not non-papal the bareboat is non-ataxic. sent3: the bareboat does pair skinheads if that it is not papal and it is not ataxic is not right. sent4: the fact that something does not pair baroreceptor hold if it is a loosestrife. sent5: if the fact that the bareboat is a kind of a thesaurus and does not supple saucepan is not incorrect it is a kind of a loosestrife. sent6: that the pluralist is apogean but it is not unmindful is not right. sent7: the bareboat is a chanfron. sent8: the circuit is ataxic if the lymphoblast is not a thesaurus and it does not supple saucepan. sent9: there exists something such that it is papal. sent10: something does pair baroreceptor if it is papal. sent11: the bareboat is not ataxic. sent12: that something pairs baroreceptor and is a chanfron is not false if it is not a kind of a homonymy. sent13: if the fact that the pluralist is not non-apogean but mindful is not correct the lymphoblast is not a homonymy. sent14: everything is a chanfron. sent15: if the lymphoblast does pair baroreceptor and it is a chanfron then it is not a loosestrife.
sent1 -> int1: the bareboat is a chanfron and a thesaurus.; int1 -> int2: the bareboat is a kind of a thesaurus.; sent4 -> int3: if the bareboat is a loosestrife it does not pair baroreceptor.;
the bareboat does pair baroreceptor.
sent10 -> int4: the bareboat pairs baroreceptor if it is papal.;
$hypothesis$ = the bareboat does not pair baroreceptor. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is a chanfron and it is a thesaurus. sent2: if there is something such that it is not non-papal the bareboat is non-ataxic. sent3: the bareboat does pair skinheads if that it is not papal and it is not ataxic is not right. sent4: the fact that something does not pair baroreceptor hold if it is a loosestrife. sent5: if the fact that the bareboat is a kind of a thesaurus and does not supple saucepan is not incorrect it is a kind of a loosestrife. sent6: that the pluralist is apogean but it is not unmindful is not right. sent7: the bareboat is a chanfron. sent8: the circuit is ataxic if the lymphoblast is not a thesaurus and it does not supple saucepan. sent9: there exists something such that it is papal. sent10: something does pair baroreceptor if it is papal. sent11: the bareboat is not ataxic. sent12: that something pairs baroreceptor and is a chanfron is not false if it is not a kind of a homonymy. sent13: if the fact that the pluralist is not non-apogean but mindful is not correct the lymphoblast is not a homonymy. sent14: everything is a chanfron. sent15: if the lymphoblast does pair baroreceptor and it is a chanfron then it is not a loosestrife. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the bareboat is a chanfron and a thesaurus.; int1 -> int2: the bareboat is a kind of a thesaurus.; sent4 -> int3: if the bareboat is a loosestrife it does not pair baroreceptor.; __UNKNOWN__