there is something such that if the fact that it is avirulent and does not ventilate Fraulein does not hold then it is not a Moorish.
sent1: if the fact that the policewoman is avirulent but it does not ventilate Fraulein does not hold it is Moorish. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is apomictic thing that is not noncombustible is incorrect it is a epistemologist. sent3: there is something such that if it ventilates Fraulein then it is not a Moorish. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it does not accelerate frankness is not false then it is not an opening. sent5: something is not a Moorish if that it is bony and it does not supple is false. sent6: if the hayfork does not ventilate Fraulein it is not a kind of a July. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it does premeditate Capek and is an ovoid is not true then the fact that it is not nice is not wrong. sent8: if that the policewoman ventilates Fraulein and it is starchless does not hold then it is not a kind of a Shylock. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it does ventilate abstractor is not incorrect it is not a publicity. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is noncritical and it is not joyous is wrong then it is not a kind of a mawkishness. sent11: that the policewoman is not a Moorish is correct if the fact that it is avirulent and does not ventilate Fraulein does not hold. sent12: something is not a Lawton if the fact that it does ventilate abstractor and is not rabid is not right. sent13: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a lather and is not a kind of a Lemmon is wrong it does ventilate Pempheridae is true. sent14: there is something such that if it does band Interpol and it is not dichromatic then it is not araneidal. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not noncritical it is not a kind of a publicity. sent16: there is something such that if it is constructive and it is not woolen then it is not agential. sent17: there is something such that if the fact that it does band Sulidae and does not premeditate succession is wrong the fact that it is a kind of a firelighter is correct. sent18: there is something such that if that it does not band Lyrurus hold the fact that it is not a kind of a Orontium is not incorrect. sent19: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not non-unneurotic and not a dragon is wrong then it does not shag hold. sent20: there exists something such that if that it bands mastopexy and it does not accelerate frankness is not right it is not axonal.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it does ventilate abstractor and it is not rabid is not correct then it is not a Lawton.
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the saskatoon does ventilate abstractor and is not rabid is not correct it is not a kind of a Lawton.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is avirulent and does not ventilate Fraulein does not hold then it is not a Moorish. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the policewoman is avirulent but it does not ventilate Fraulein does not hold it is Moorish. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is apomictic thing that is not noncombustible is incorrect it is a epistemologist. sent3: there is something such that if it ventilates Fraulein then it is not a Moorish. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it does not accelerate frankness is not false then it is not an opening. sent5: something is not a Moorish if that it is bony and it does not supple is false. sent6: if the hayfork does not ventilate Fraulein it is not a kind of a July. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it does premeditate Capek and is an ovoid is not true then the fact that it is not nice is not wrong. sent8: if that the policewoman ventilates Fraulein and it is starchless does not hold then it is not a kind of a Shylock. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it does ventilate abstractor is not incorrect it is not a publicity. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is noncritical and it is not joyous is wrong then it is not a kind of a mawkishness. sent11: that the policewoman is not a Moorish is correct if the fact that it is avirulent and does not ventilate Fraulein does not hold. sent12: something is not a Lawton if the fact that it does ventilate abstractor and is not rabid is not right. sent13: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a lather and is not a kind of a Lemmon is wrong it does ventilate Pempheridae is true. sent14: there is something such that if it does band Interpol and it is not dichromatic then it is not araneidal. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not noncritical it is not a kind of a publicity. sent16: there is something such that if it is constructive and it is not woolen then it is not agential. sent17: there is something such that if the fact that it does band Sulidae and does not premeditate succession is wrong the fact that it is a kind of a firelighter is correct. sent18: there is something such that if that it does not band Lyrurus hold the fact that it is not a kind of a Orontium is not incorrect. sent19: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not non-unneurotic and not a dragon is wrong then it does not shag hold. sent20: there exists something such that if that it bands mastopexy and it does not accelerate frankness is not right it is not axonal. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__