the fact that the besieging subaltern and the non-distalness happens is false.
sent1: that the fatwa does not occur but the anisogamicness occurs prevents that the parcellation does not occur. sent2: the anisogamicness happens. sent3: that the sharpness happens is not false. sent4: the fact that the circumvolution happens and the besieging etamine happens is not wrong. sent5: the besieging etamine does not occur if that the catabolizing but not the fatwa happens is wrong. sent6: that the mooring dada does not occur is triggered by the parcellation. sent7: if the mooring dada does not occur the fact that the besieging subaltern occurs but the distalness does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the anisogamicness happens and/or the besieging etamine does not occur then the brawl happens. sent9: the scattering happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the catabolizing occurs but the fatwa does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the besieging etamine does not occur.; sent4 -> int2: the besieging etamine happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the catabolizing occurs and the fatwa does not occur.; int4 -> int5: that the fatwa does not occur hold.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fatwa does not occur and the anisogamicness happens.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the parcellation happens.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the mooring dada does not occur.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the brawl occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the besieging subaltern and the non-distalness happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fatwa does not occur but the anisogamicness occurs prevents that the parcellation does not occur. sent2: the anisogamicness happens. sent3: that the sharpness happens is not false. sent4: the fact that the circumvolution happens and the besieging etamine happens is not wrong. sent5: the besieging etamine does not occur if that the catabolizing but not the fatwa happens is wrong. sent6: that the mooring dada does not occur is triggered by the parcellation. sent7: if the mooring dada does not occur the fact that the besieging subaltern occurs but the distalness does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the anisogamicness happens and/or the besieging etamine does not occur then the brawl happens. sent9: the scattering happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the catabolizing occurs but the fatwa does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the besieging etamine does not occur.; sent4 -> int2: the besieging etamine happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the catabolizing occurs and the fatwa does not occur.; int4 -> int5: that the fatwa does not occur hold.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fatwa does not occur and the anisogamicness happens.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the parcellation happens.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the mooring dada does not occur.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__