the harvestfish is a Sinitic but it is not telegraphic.
sent1: the fact that if the fact that something is not a heave is true it is a Sinitic and it is not classicistic hold. sent2: the subject is not a heave. sent3: something is a Sinitic but it is non-telegraphic if the fact that it is not a bigheartedness hold. sent4: the harvestfish is a heave. sent5: that the bennet does not heat adulation is right. sent6: the harvestfish is Sinitic. sent7: if something that is a snarer is a bigheartedness then the bennet is not classicistic. sent8: That the adulation does not heat bennet is right. sent9: the Sunni is classicistic. sent10: the bennet is not telegraphic. sent11: the Sunni is a kind of a bellied that does not heat adulation. sent12: the harvestfish is a snarer if it does heave. sent13: that the Sunni is non-classicistic thing that is not a heave does not hold. sent14: the harvestfish is not a Upanishad and it does not heat adulation. sent15: there exists something such that it does heat adulation. sent16: the Sunni is a spikemoss. sent17: that the bennet is not classicistic and it does not heat adulation is not correct if there exists something such that it is classicistic. sent18: something is a snarer. sent19: that the orthoepist does not paganize clinic is not true. sent20: the ear is telegraphic.
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the harvestfish is a snarer.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the harvestfish is a bigheartedness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the harvestfish is a kind of a snarer and it is a kind of a bigheartedness.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a kind of a snarer that is a kind of a bigheartedness.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the bennet is not classicistic.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the bennet is not classicistic and does not heat adulation.; sent9 -> int6: there exists something such that it is classicistic.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: that the bennet is a kind of non-classicistic thing that does not heat adulation is not right.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the harvestfish is not a kind of a bigheartedness hold.; sent3 -> int10: if the harvestfish is not a bigheartedness it is both not non-Sinitic and non-telegraphic.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the harvestfish is a Sinitic but it is not telegraphic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the fact that something is not a heave is true it is a Sinitic and it is not classicistic hold. sent2: the subject is not a heave. sent3: something is a Sinitic but it is non-telegraphic if the fact that it is not a bigheartedness hold. sent4: the harvestfish is a heave. sent5: that the bennet does not heat adulation is right. sent6: the harvestfish is Sinitic. sent7: if something that is a snarer is a bigheartedness then the bennet is not classicistic. sent8: That the adulation does not heat bennet is right. sent9: the Sunni is classicistic. sent10: the bennet is not telegraphic. sent11: the Sunni is a kind of a bellied that does not heat adulation. sent12: the harvestfish is a snarer if it does heave. sent13: that the Sunni is non-classicistic thing that is not a heave does not hold. sent14: the harvestfish is not a Upanishad and it does not heat adulation. sent15: there exists something such that it does heat adulation. sent16: the Sunni is a spikemoss. sent17: that the bennet is not classicistic and it does not heat adulation is not correct if there exists something such that it is classicistic. sent18: something is a snarer. sent19: that the orthoepist does not paganize clinic is not true. sent20: the ear is telegraphic. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the harvestfish is a snarer.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the harvestfish is a bigheartedness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the harvestfish is a kind of a snarer and it is a kind of a bigheartedness.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a kind of a snarer that is a kind of a bigheartedness.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the bennet is not classicistic.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the bennet is not classicistic and does not heat adulation.; sent9 -> int6: there exists something such that it is classicistic.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: that the bennet is a kind of non-classicistic thing that does not heat adulation is not right.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the harvestfish is not a kind of a bigheartedness hold.; sent3 -> int10: if the harvestfish is not a bigheartedness it is both not non-Sinitic and non-telegraphic.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__