there exists something such that if that it is not a desert is incorrect then it is not a antilogarithm and it does not glare Kartik.
sent1: if the fact that something does not cram and does signify is correct it is not thin. sent2: the Stayman trespasses and it is a dose. sent3: if the fact that something is either not a antilogarithm or not a Gymnosporangium or both is false then it is a desert. sent4: if the videodisk does desert and it is a Gymnosporangium then it is not a antilogarithm. sent5: there exists something such that if it deserts then it does not glare Kartik. sent6: the fact that the videodisk glares Kartik is false. sent7: there exists something such that if it is spherical then it is not an antique. sent8: a non-thin thing glares Kartik and is a dysgenesis. sent9: something does not cram but it does signify if it does rope headrest. sent10: if the videodisk glares Kartik then that the fact that the ropewalk is not a antilogarithm and/or it is not a Gymnosporangium is not true is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a desert then it is not a kind of a antilogarithm. sent12: The fact that the Kartik glares videodisk is false.
the ropewalk deserts.
sent3 -> int1: the ropewalk is a desert if the fact that it either is not a kind of a antilogarithm or is not a kind of a Gymnosporangium or both is not correct.; sent8 -> int2: the videodisk glares Kartik and is a dysgenesis if it does not thin.; sent1 -> int3: if the videodisk does not cram and signifies then it is not thin.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the videodisk does not cram and does signify is right if it does rope headrest.; sent2 -> int5: something is a trespass and it is a dose.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not a desert is incorrect then it is not a antilogarithm and it does not glare Kartik. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not cram and does signify is correct it is not thin. sent2: the Stayman trespasses and it is a dose. sent3: if the fact that something is either not a antilogarithm or not a Gymnosporangium or both is false then it is a desert. sent4: if the videodisk does desert and it is a Gymnosporangium then it is not a antilogarithm. sent5: there exists something such that if it deserts then it does not glare Kartik. sent6: the fact that the videodisk glares Kartik is false. sent7: there exists something such that if it is spherical then it is not an antique. sent8: a non-thin thing glares Kartik and is a dysgenesis. sent9: something does not cram but it does signify if it does rope headrest. sent10: if the videodisk glares Kartik then that the fact that the ropewalk is not a antilogarithm and/or it is not a Gymnosporangium is not true is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a desert then it is not a kind of a antilogarithm. sent12: The fact that the Kartik glares videodisk is false. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__