the overactivity clangors chapped.
sent1: the bluepoint is not a carbomycin. sent2: if something is not an exhumation it is not an inflexibility. sent3: if the freeholder is a altazimuth that the shiksa is ctenoid and it is a kind of a cusk does not hold. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a carbomycin and it capsules rangefinder then the freeholder is a altazimuth. sent5: there exists something such that that it does not capsule rangefinder is not false. sent6: the freeholder is a kind of a altazimuth if something that is a carbomycin does not capsule rangefinder. sent7: that something is not an exhumation and it is not an inflexibility is not true if that it clangors chapped is correct. sent8: if the bluepoint is not a carbomycin then it is a kind of a altazimuth and it clangors chapped. sent9: the overactivity does capsule rangefinder but it is not a Ondaatje. sent10: the shiksa is not a cusk. sent11: if that the bluepoint is a tablespoon and is not an inflexibility is not correct the overactivity does not clangor chapped. sent12: that something is not a kind of a cusk is true if it is an exhumation. sent13: if the shiksa is not an inflexibility then the fact that the bluepoint is a kind of a tablespoon but it is not an inflexibility does not hold. sent14: that the shiksa is ctenoid but it is not a kind of a cusk is not correct if the freeholder is a altazimuth. sent15: there is something such that it is a Ondaatje and it is a kind of a Melophagus. sent16: the fact that the shiksa is not non-ctenoid and it is a cusk is not right. sent17: if something is an exhumation it is a kind of ctenoid thing that is not a kind of a cusk. sent18: the fact that the bluepoint is a kind of a tablespoon and it is an inflexibility is not right. sent19: there is something such that it is a kind of a carbomycin and it does not capsule rangefinder. sent20: if that the bluepoint is a kind of an inflexibility is not incorrect then the overactivity does not clangor chapped. sent21: the shiksa is not a kind of a cusk if it is an exhumation. sent22: that the overactivity is not an exhumation and is an inflexibility is not true if the bluepoint is not a tablespoon. sent23: the fact that that the bluepoint is both a tablespoon and an inflexibility is not right if the shiksa is not an inflexibility is right.
sent17 -> int1: the shiksa is both not non-ctenoid and not a cusk if it is a kind of an exhumation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shiksa is an exhumation.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the shiksa is ctenoid and not a cusk.; sent19 & sent6 -> int3: the freeholder is a altazimuth.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the shiksa is ctenoid but it is not a kind of a cusk is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the shiksa is not an exhumation.; sent2 -> int7: if the shiksa is not an exhumation then it is not an inflexibility.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the shiksa is not an inflexibility.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the fact that the bluepoint is a tablespoon but it is not an inflexibility is not right.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the overactivity does clangor chapped.
$hypothesis$ = the overactivity clangors chapped. ; $context$ = sent1: the bluepoint is not a carbomycin. sent2: if something is not an exhumation it is not an inflexibility. sent3: if the freeholder is a altazimuth that the shiksa is ctenoid and it is a kind of a cusk does not hold. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a carbomycin and it capsules rangefinder then the freeholder is a altazimuth. sent5: there exists something such that that it does not capsule rangefinder is not false. sent6: the freeholder is a kind of a altazimuth if something that is a carbomycin does not capsule rangefinder. sent7: that something is not an exhumation and it is not an inflexibility is not true if that it clangors chapped is correct. sent8: if the bluepoint is not a carbomycin then it is a kind of a altazimuth and it clangors chapped. sent9: the overactivity does capsule rangefinder but it is not a Ondaatje. sent10: the shiksa is not a cusk. sent11: if that the bluepoint is a tablespoon and is not an inflexibility is not correct the overactivity does not clangor chapped. sent12: that something is not a kind of a cusk is true if it is an exhumation. sent13: if the shiksa is not an inflexibility then the fact that the bluepoint is a kind of a tablespoon but it is not an inflexibility does not hold. sent14: that the shiksa is ctenoid but it is not a kind of a cusk is not correct if the freeholder is a altazimuth. sent15: there is something such that it is a Ondaatje and it is a kind of a Melophagus. sent16: the fact that the shiksa is not non-ctenoid and it is a cusk is not right. sent17: if something is an exhumation it is a kind of ctenoid thing that is not a kind of a cusk. sent18: the fact that the bluepoint is a kind of a tablespoon and it is an inflexibility is not right. sent19: there is something such that it is a kind of a carbomycin and it does not capsule rangefinder. sent20: if that the bluepoint is a kind of an inflexibility is not incorrect then the overactivity does not clangor chapped. sent21: the shiksa is not a kind of a cusk if it is an exhumation. sent22: that the overactivity is not an exhumation and is an inflexibility is not true if the bluepoint is not a tablespoon. sent23: the fact that that the bluepoint is both a tablespoon and an inflexibility is not right if the shiksa is not an inflexibility is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the shiksa is both not non-ctenoid and not a cusk if it is a kind of an exhumation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shiksa is an exhumation.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the shiksa is ctenoid and not a cusk.; sent19 & sent6 -> int3: the freeholder is a altazimuth.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the shiksa is ctenoid but it is not a kind of a cusk is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the shiksa is not an exhumation.; sent2 -> int7: if the shiksa is not an exhumation then it is not an inflexibility.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the shiksa is not an inflexibility.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the fact that the bluepoint is a tablespoon but it is not an inflexibility is not right.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__