the fact that the cubitiere is a lovage if the gamecock is cervical is not correct.
sent1: that something is not a halothane but teratogenic is false if it is not a lovage. sent2: the fact that the cubitiere is not a kind of a halothane but it is teratogenic is not correct if it is a kind of a lovage. sent3: if that the cubitiere is a kind of a halothane hold then that the gamecock is not cervical is correct. sent4: if something is not a halothane then the fact that it is cervical and it is teratogenic does not hold. sent5: if the fact that the cubitiere is not a halothane but it is teratogenic is not right then that the gamecock is not cervical hold. sent6: the fact that something is not a halothane but it is teratogenic is incorrect if it is a lovage. sent7: that the cubitiere is not a lovage but it is teratogenic is incorrect if it is cervical. sent8: if something is not a kind of a lovage that it is not a kind of a toxicity and is a covert is not right. sent9: if that the gamecock is a kind of a lovage is true then that it is both not cervical and a halothane is false. sent10: if something is not a Reaumur then the fact that it does not deduce dramatist and it is cervical does not hold. sent11: if something is a lovage the fact that it is not a halothane and it is cervical does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: that the cubitiere is both not a halothane and teratogenic is incorrect if it is not a lovage.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cubitiere is not a lovage.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the cubitiere is not a halothane and is teratogenic is false.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the gamecock is not cervical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gamecock is cervical.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the cubitiere is a lovage.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the cubitiere is not the toxicity but it is covert is not correct if the cubitiere is not a lovage is correct.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cubitiere is a lovage if the gamecock is cervical is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a halothane but teratogenic is false if it is not a lovage. sent2: the fact that the cubitiere is not a kind of a halothane but it is teratogenic is not correct if it is a kind of a lovage. sent3: if that the cubitiere is a kind of a halothane hold then that the gamecock is not cervical is correct. sent4: if something is not a halothane then the fact that it is cervical and it is teratogenic does not hold. sent5: if the fact that the cubitiere is not a halothane but it is teratogenic is not right then that the gamecock is not cervical hold. sent6: the fact that something is not a halothane but it is teratogenic is incorrect if it is a lovage. sent7: that the cubitiere is not a lovage but it is teratogenic is incorrect if it is cervical. sent8: if something is not a kind of a lovage that it is not a kind of a toxicity and is a covert is not right. sent9: if that the gamecock is a kind of a lovage is true then that it is both not cervical and a halothane is false. sent10: if something is not a Reaumur then the fact that it does not deduce dramatist and it is cervical does not hold. sent11: if something is a lovage the fact that it is not a halothane and it is cervical does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: that the cubitiere is both not a halothane and teratogenic is incorrect if it is not a lovage.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cubitiere is not a lovage.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the cubitiere is not a halothane and is teratogenic is false.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the gamecock is not cervical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gamecock is cervical.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the cubitiere is a lovage.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__