the periosteum reciprocates bugler.
sent1: that the periosteum does relive and is anserine is not correct. sent2: something is not a tour if it is comatose and it reciprocates bugler. sent3: the periosteum is a kind of a tour. sent4: if that the fact that the periosteum does relive and is anserine hold is wrong then it is not nominal. sent5: something is non-metrological thing that is not a prophetess. sent6: if something is not a nominal it is comatose. sent7: if the parsnip is not anserine the fact that the imam does not relive but it is comatose is not correct.
sent6 -> int1: if the periosteum is not a nominal it is comatose.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the periosteum is non-nominal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the periosteum is not non-comatose.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the periosteum does reciprocate bugler.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the periosteum is comatose and reciprocates bugler.; sent2 -> int5: if the periosteum is comatose and does reciprocate bugler that it is not a tour hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the periosteum is not a tour is not false.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the imam does tour.
$hypothesis$ = the periosteum reciprocates bugler. ; $context$ = sent1: that the periosteum does relive and is anserine is not correct. sent2: something is not a tour if it is comatose and it reciprocates bugler. sent3: the periosteum is a kind of a tour. sent4: if that the fact that the periosteum does relive and is anserine hold is wrong then it is not nominal. sent5: something is non-metrological thing that is not a prophetess. sent6: if something is not a nominal it is comatose. sent7: if the parsnip is not anserine the fact that the imam does not relive but it is comatose is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the periosteum is not a nominal it is comatose.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the periosteum is non-nominal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the periosteum is not non-comatose.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the periosteum does reciprocate bugler.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the periosteum is comatose and reciprocates bugler.; sent2 -> int5: if the periosteum is comatose and does reciprocate bugler that it is not a tour hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the periosteum is not a tour is not false.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__