the boast happens and the dinging knackwurst does not occur.
sent1: the newness occurs. sent2: the fact that the acquiescence does not occur and/or the riptide occurs is not right if the lucifugousness does not occur. sent3: the acquiescence does not occur and/or the riptide occurs. sent4: if both the redetermination and the liberalization happens then the buyout does not occur. sent5: if the welding does not occur the stakeout does not occur but the lucifugousness happens. sent6: the thalloidness happens. sent7: the rave does not occur. sent8: the occasioning does not occur and/or the liberalization occurs. sent9: both the oleophobicness and the non-consularness occurs. sent10: the fact that the unperceptiveness does not occur and the outgeneraling ticktock does not occur does not hold. sent11: the headquartering isoleucine happens. sent12: the emigrating does not occur. sent13: the welding occurs. sent14: the fact that the corticalness does not occur but the amelioration happens does not hold. sent15: that the corticalness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur is false. sent16: that the coursing does not occur and/or the outgeneraling pellitory occurs is incorrect. sent17: the boasting happens if the amelioration happens. sent18: either the acquiescence occurs or the riptide happens or both. sent19: the fact that the going does not occur and the altostratus does not occur is not correct. sent20: the dinging knackwurst does not occur if not the dramatization but the thalloidness happens. sent21: the fact that the unperceptiveness occurs is correct. sent22: the fact that the outgeneraling wonderberry does not occur and the headquartering ergodicity happens is not true. sent23: that the dramatization does not occur is caused by that both the lucifugousness and the welding happens. sent24: the amelioration happens if that the corticalness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lucifugousness does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the acquiescence does not occur or the riptide happens or both does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the lucifugousness occurs.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the lucifugousness and the welding occurs is not incorrect.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the dramatization does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the dramatization does not occur but the thalloidness happens.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the dinging knackwurst does not occur.; sent24 & sent15 -> int8: the amelioration occurs.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: the boast occurs.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the stakeout does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the boast happens and the dinging knackwurst does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the newness occurs. sent2: the fact that the acquiescence does not occur and/or the riptide occurs is not right if the lucifugousness does not occur. sent3: the acquiescence does not occur and/or the riptide occurs. sent4: if both the redetermination and the liberalization happens then the buyout does not occur. sent5: if the welding does not occur the stakeout does not occur but the lucifugousness happens. sent6: the thalloidness happens. sent7: the rave does not occur. sent8: the occasioning does not occur and/or the liberalization occurs. sent9: both the oleophobicness and the non-consularness occurs. sent10: the fact that the unperceptiveness does not occur and the outgeneraling ticktock does not occur does not hold. sent11: the headquartering isoleucine happens. sent12: the emigrating does not occur. sent13: the welding occurs. sent14: the fact that the corticalness does not occur but the amelioration happens does not hold. sent15: that the corticalness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur is false. sent16: that the coursing does not occur and/or the outgeneraling pellitory occurs is incorrect. sent17: the boasting happens if the amelioration happens. sent18: either the acquiescence occurs or the riptide happens or both. sent19: the fact that the going does not occur and the altostratus does not occur is not correct. sent20: the dinging knackwurst does not occur if not the dramatization but the thalloidness happens. sent21: the fact that the unperceptiveness occurs is correct. sent22: the fact that the outgeneraling wonderberry does not occur and the headquartering ergodicity happens is not true. sent23: that the dramatization does not occur is caused by that both the lucifugousness and the welding happens. sent24: the amelioration happens if that the corticalness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lucifugousness does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the acquiescence does not occur or the riptide happens or both does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the lucifugousness occurs.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the lucifugousness and the welding occurs is not incorrect.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the dramatization does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the dramatization does not occur but the thalloidness happens.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the dinging knackwurst does not occur.; sent24 & sent15 -> int8: the amelioration occurs.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: the boast occurs.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__