that the chlorofluorocarbon is not canalicular if the airdock is a Chiron and large-capitalization is not correct.
sent1: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy if the airdock is a kind of a monochromacy. sent2: the airdock saponifies. sent3: the chlorofluorocarbon is a kind of a Chiron if it is large-capitalization. sent4: if something is evangelical then it is a monochromacy. sent5: if the gouger is not non-large-capitalization then the chlorofluorocarbon is non-large-capitalization but it is not a kind of a monochromacy. sent6: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy that is canalicular. sent7: the chlorofluorocarbon is not a monochromacy if the airdock is a Chiron and it is canalicular. sent8: that the chlorofluorocarbon is canalicular is not wrong if the airdock is a kind of a Chiron and is large-capitalization. sent9: the airdock is large-capitalization. sent10: everything is not non-intercostal. sent11: the Benjamin is not canalicular if the fact that the airdock is non-large-capitalization thing that is a Chiron is false. sent12: if the airdock is a kind of a monochromacy then the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy but it is not canalicular. sent13: if the airdock is canalicular then the chlorofluorocarbon is canalicular but it is not a kind of a Chiron. sent14: the airdock is a steal. sent15: that something is not large-capitalization and is a Chiron does not hold if it is a monochromacy. sent16: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy. sent17: if the airdock is a kind of a monochromacy the chlorofluorocarbon is a kind of a monochromacy and it is canalicular. sent18: if the airdock is a Chiron then it is a monochromacy. sent19: if the airdock is a Chiron then the chlorofluorocarbon is a Chiron. sent20: the chlorofluorocarbon is canalicular. sent21: if that something does not reign Salome and is not thalassic is wrong then that it is evangelical is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airdock is a kind of a Chiron and is large-capitalization.; assump1 -> int1: the airdock is a Chiron.; sent18 & int1 -> int2: the airdock is a monochromacy.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy but it is not canalicular.; int3 -> int4: the chlorofluorocarbon is not canalicular.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the Benjamin is non-canalicular.
sent4 -> int5: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy if it is evangelical.; sent21 -> int6: the chlorofluorocarbon is evangelical if the fact that it does not reign Salome and is not thalassic does not hold.; sent10 -> int7: the chlorofluorocarbon is a kind of a intercostal.; sent15 -> int8: if the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy the fact that it is not large-capitalization and it is a Chiron does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the chlorofluorocarbon is not canalicular if the airdock is a Chiron and large-capitalization is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy if the airdock is a kind of a monochromacy. sent2: the airdock saponifies. sent3: the chlorofluorocarbon is a kind of a Chiron if it is large-capitalization. sent4: if something is evangelical then it is a monochromacy. sent5: if the gouger is not non-large-capitalization then the chlorofluorocarbon is non-large-capitalization but it is not a kind of a monochromacy. sent6: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy that is canalicular. sent7: the chlorofluorocarbon is not a monochromacy if the airdock is a Chiron and it is canalicular. sent8: that the chlorofluorocarbon is canalicular is not wrong if the airdock is a kind of a Chiron and is large-capitalization. sent9: the airdock is large-capitalization. sent10: everything is not non-intercostal. sent11: the Benjamin is not canalicular if the fact that the airdock is non-large-capitalization thing that is a Chiron is false. sent12: if the airdock is a kind of a monochromacy then the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy but it is not canalicular. sent13: if the airdock is canalicular then the chlorofluorocarbon is canalicular but it is not a kind of a Chiron. sent14: the airdock is a steal. sent15: that something is not large-capitalization and is a Chiron does not hold if it is a monochromacy. sent16: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy. sent17: if the airdock is a kind of a monochromacy the chlorofluorocarbon is a kind of a monochromacy and it is canalicular. sent18: if the airdock is a Chiron then it is a monochromacy. sent19: if the airdock is a Chiron then the chlorofluorocarbon is a Chiron. sent20: the chlorofluorocarbon is canalicular. sent21: if that something does not reign Salome and is not thalassic is wrong then that it is evangelical is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airdock is a kind of a Chiron and is large-capitalization.; assump1 -> int1: the airdock is a Chiron.; sent18 & int1 -> int2: the airdock is a monochromacy.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the chlorofluorocarbon is a monochromacy but it is not canalicular.; int3 -> int4: the chlorofluorocarbon is not canalicular.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__