the whole is not a Orczy.
sent1: something is not muciferous. sent2: if something is a kind of a management then the fact that it is both not a preposition and a canter is not right. sent3: if something is not anatomic the fact that it does not rope petroglyph and is not an invertebrate does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that it is not profaned and not non-figurative. sent5: the signboard is not soft if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a preposition and it is a canter is incorrect. sent6: the mammal does concoct antioxidant. sent7: if something is a preposition then it is a canter. sent8: the fact that something does not concoct antioxidant and is not a Orczy is incorrect if it is a kind of a stave. sent9: that the prosthetist is both muciferous and a management is false. sent10: if there exists something such that it is soft the whole is a preposition. sent11: the mammal is a stave if that the prosthetist is both a Mergus and not muciferous does not hold. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a think that does triangulate. sent13: the whole is a preposition if that there exists something such that it either is a Mergus or is soft or both is not incorrect. sent14: the Luxemburger is a thrombin if something is not profaned and is figurative. sent15: the Luxemburger is not anatomic if the fact that it is a thrombin is correct. sent16: if that something does not rope petroglyph and is not an invertebrate does not hold it is a management. sent17: The antioxidant does concoct mammal. sent18: the signboard does concoct antioxidant. sent19: if that the prosthetist is muciferous and it is a management is not true it is not muciferous. sent20: the prosthetist is a stave if the mammal does concoct antioxidant. sent21: the bloodberry does rope semitrance. sent22: if the signboard is not soft that the prosthetist is a Mergus but it is not muciferous is incorrect. sent23: the signboard is a Mergus if something is a stave but it is not muciferous.
sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the prosthetist does stave.; sent19 & sent9 -> int2: the prosthetist is not muciferous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the prosthetist is a stave that is non-muciferous.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it staves and is not muciferous.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the signboard is a Mergus.; int5 -> int6: the signboard either is a kind of a Mergus or is soft or both.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a kind of a Mergus and/or it is soft.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the fact that the whole is a kind of a preposition is not wrong.; sent7 -> int9: the whole does canter if it is a kind of a preposition.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the whole is a canter.;
the whole is a Orczy.
sent8 -> int11: if the mammal is a stave the fact that it does not concoct antioxidant and is not a Orczy is not right.; sent2 -> int12: if the Luxemburger is a management then the fact that it is not a preposition and is a kind of a canter is wrong.; sent16 -> int13: if the fact that the Luxemburger does not rope petroglyph and is not an invertebrate is not true it is a management.; sent3 -> int14: if the Luxemburger is not anatomic then the fact that it does not rope petroglyph and is not an invertebrate is false.; sent4 & sent14 -> int15: the Luxemburger is a thrombin.; sent15 & int15 -> int16: the Luxemburger is not anatomic.; int14 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the Luxemburger does not rope petroglyph and is not an invertebrate is not true.; int13 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the Luxemburger is a management hold.; int12 & int18 -> int19: that the Luxemburger is not a kind of a preposition and does canter is incorrect.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that the fact that it is not a preposition and is a canter is not right.; int20 & sent5 -> int21: the signboard is not soft.; sent22 & int21 -> int22: that the fact that the prosthetist is a kind of a Mergus and is not muciferous is not correct is not incorrect.; sent11 & int22 -> int23: the mammal is a stave.; int11 & int23 -> int24: that that the mammal does not concoct antioxidant and is not a kind of a Orczy is true is false.; int24 -> int25: there exists something such that that it does not concoct antioxidant and it is not a Orczy is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the whole is not a Orczy. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not muciferous. sent2: if something is a kind of a management then the fact that it is both not a preposition and a canter is not right. sent3: if something is not anatomic the fact that it does not rope petroglyph and is not an invertebrate does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that it is not profaned and not non-figurative. sent5: the signboard is not soft if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a preposition and it is a canter is incorrect. sent6: the mammal does concoct antioxidant. sent7: if something is a preposition then it is a canter. sent8: the fact that something does not concoct antioxidant and is not a Orczy is incorrect if it is a kind of a stave. sent9: that the prosthetist is both muciferous and a management is false. sent10: if there exists something such that it is soft the whole is a preposition. sent11: the mammal is a stave if that the prosthetist is both a Mergus and not muciferous does not hold. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a think that does triangulate. sent13: the whole is a preposition if that there exists something such that it either is a Mergus or is soft or both is not incorrect. sent14: the Luxemburger is a thrombin if something is not profaned and is figurative. sent15: the Luxemburger is not anatomic if the fact that it is a thrombin is correct. sent16: if that something does not rope petroglyph and is not an invertebrate does not hold it is a management. sent17: The antioxidant does concoct mammal. sent18: the signboard does concoct antioxidant. sent19: if that the prosthetist is muciferous and it is a management is not true it is not muciferous. sent20: the prosthetist is a stave if the mammal does concoct antioxidant. sent21: the bloodberry does rope semitrance. sent22: if the signboard is not soft that the prosthetist is a Mergus but it is not muciferous is incorrect. sent23: the signboard is a Mergus if something is a stave but it is not muciferous. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the prosthetist does stave.; sent19 & sent9 -> int2: the prosthetist is not muciferous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the prosthetist is a stave that is non-muciferous.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it staves and is not muciferous.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the signboard is a Mergus.; int5 -> int6: the signboard either is a kind of a Mergus or is soft or both.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a kind of a Mergus and/or it is soft.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the fact that the whole is a kind of a preposition is not wrong.; sent7 -> int9: the whole does canter if it is a kind of a preposition.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the whole is a canter.; __UNKNOWN__