there exists something such that that it is not a Fargo and it does not preach is not true.
sent1: there is something such that it is not a Fargo and does not preach. sent2: the calcium is not an embankment. sent3: if the calcium is not an embankment the fact that that it is a kind of a Fargo and it does not preach is true is false. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of an embankment and it is puerile is incorrect then the calcium is an embankment. sent5: if the calcium is not an embankment that it is not a kind of a Fargo and it does not preach is false. sent6: if something is an embankment then the fact that it does not putt and is not a kind of a hyperbola is false.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the calcium is not a Fargo and it does not preach is right is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that that it is not a putt and it is not a kind of a hyperbola is not correct.
sent6 -> int2: if the calcium is an embankment the fact that it does not putt and is not a hyperbola does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it is not a Fargo and it does not preach is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not a Fargo and does not preach. sent2: the calcium is not an embankment. sent3: if the calcium is not an embankment the fact that that it is a kind of a Fargo and it does not preach is true is false. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of an embankment and it is puerile is incorrect then the calcium is an embankment. sent5: if the calcium is not an embankment that it is not a kind of a Fargo and it does not preach is false. sent6: if something is an embankment then the fact that it does not putt and is not a kind of a hyperbola is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the calcium is not a Fargo and it does not preach is right is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__