the cockney does not redden saddlebill but it is anthropometric.
sent1: the cockney is anthropometric if it does not get sordidness. sent2: The sordidness does not get cockney. sent3: if the guaiac is not a kind of a coordinate then the cockney is analphabetic thing that does not angle frotteur. sent4: the cockney is analphabetic. sent5: that the guaiac is a kind of a Glengarry that is not a seam does not hold if the grain is not a detour. sent6: if the grain is a detour and/or it is a Glengarry the guaiac does not coordinate. sent7: if something is not a seam the fact that it does not redden saddlebill and it is anthropometric does not hold. sent8: the grain does seam and is a kind of a detour. sent9: the grain is not a detour and does coordinate if there exists something such that it is not analphabetic. sent10: if something angles frotteur then the fact that it is analphabetic thing that does not redden saddlebill is not correct. sent11: something is not a Glengarry if the fact that it is a kind of a Glengarry that does not seam is not correct. sent12: if the cockney does not angle frotteur it does not redden saddlebill.
sent8 -> int1: the grain does detour.; int1 -> int2: either the grain is a detour or it is a kind of a Glengarry or both.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the guaiac is not a coordinate is right.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the cockney is analphabetic and does not angle frotteur.; int4 -> int5: that the cockney does not angle frotteur is not wrong.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the cockney does not redden saddlebill.;
that the cockney does not redden saddlebill and is anthropometric is wrong.
sent7 -> int7: that the cockney does not redden saddlebill but it is anthropometric is not correct if it is not a kind of a seam.;
$hypothesis$ = the cockney does not redden saddlebill but it is anthropometric. ; $context$ = sent1: the cockney is anthropometric if it does not get sordidness. sent2: The sordidness does not get cockney. sent3: if the guaiac is not a kind of a coordinate then the cockney is analphabetic thing that does not angle frotteur. sent4: the cockney is analphabetic. sent5: that the guaiac is a kind of a Glengarry that is not a seam does not hold if the grain is not a detour. sent6: if the grain is a detour and/or it is a Glengarry the guaiac does not coordinate. sent7: if something is not a seam the fact that it does not redden saddlebill and it is anthropometric does not hold. sent8: the grain does seam and is a kind of a detour. sent9: the grain is not a detour and does coordinate if there exists something such that it is not analphabetic. sent10: if something angles frotteur then the fact that it is analphabetic thing that does not redden saddlebill is not correct. sent11: something is not a Glengarry if the fact that it is a kind of a Glengarry that does not seam is not correct. sent12: if the cockney does not angle frotteur it does not redden saddlebill. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the grain does detour.; int1 -> int2: either the grain is a detour or it is a kind of a Glengarry or both.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the guaiac is not a coordinate is right.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the cockney is analphabetic and does not angle frotteur.; int4 -> int5: that the cockney does not angle frotteur is not wrong.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the cockney does not redden saddlebill.; __UNKNOWN__