that the puller is not cyclopean and it is not skinless does not hold.
sent1: something is a kind of a longbow if it is a kind of a policeman. sent2: the bypass is not a bastion if the markhor is a kind of a policeman that is not Unitarian. sent3: the bypass is a Siphonaptera. sent4: that that the puller is not cyclopean but it is skinless is not wrong is wrong if the valine is not skinless. sent5: if a bastion is not a kind of a Unitarian it is a policeman. sent6: the bypass is cyclopean if it is a kind of a bastion. sent7: the puller is both a bastion and not a Unitarian if the valine is a Siphonaptera. sent8: that something is not non-smokeless and it is isentropic is wrong if it is not odorless. sent9: that the puller is a kind of cyclopean thing that is not skinless is not right if the valine is not skinless. sent10: if the markhor is a longbow then it is not a kind of a Unitarian. sent11: the bypass is a bastion if it is a Siphonaptera. sent12: if that something is not a kind of a condiment but it is odorless does not hold it is not odorless. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is smokeless and is isentropic is wrong then the bypass is not smokeless. sent14: something is non-Unitarian if that it is a longbow is not wrong. sent15: something is a Siphonaptera and it is incoherent if it does not bestrew caul. sent16: the bypass is not a bastion if the markhor is a kind of a policeman that is a Unitarian. sent17: the fact that the puller is both cyclopean and not skinless does not hold. sent18: if something is a kind of a longbow it is a kind of a policeman and it is not Unitarian. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is abundant and it is an intercourse does not hold then the valine does not bestrew caul. sent20: if the valine is not skinless then the fact that the puller is not cyclopean and it is not skinless is not right. sent21: the fact that the markhor is abundant thing that is an intercourse is not right if the bypass is not smokeless. sent22: there is nothing such that it is not a condiment but odorless. sent23: that the markhor is a longbow hold if the valine is not skinned. sent24: that the puller is both not cyclopean and skinless is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valine is skinless.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the markhor is a longbow.; sent18 -> int2: if the markhor is a kind of a longbow then it is a policeman and is not a kind of a Unitarian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the markhor is a policeman but it is not Unitarian.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the bypass is not a bastion is correct.; sent11 & sent3 -> int5: the bypass is a bastion.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the valine is not skinless.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the puller is not cyclopean and it is not skinless.
sent1 -> int8: if the puller is a kind of a policeman it is a longbow.; sent5 -> int9: if the puller is a bastion but it is non-Unitarian it is a policeman.; sent15 -> int10: the valine is a Siphonaptera and it is incoherent if it does not bestrew caul.; sent12 -> int11: if that the invention is not a condiment but odorless does not hold that it is not odorless is not wrong.; sent22 -> int12: that the invention is not a condiment but it is odorless is incorrect.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the invention is not odorless.; sent8 -> int14: that the invention is smokeless and it is isentropic does not hold if it is not odorless.; int13 & int14 -> int15: that the invention is smokeless and it is isentropic is false.; int15 -> int16: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of smokeless thing that is isentropic.; int16 -> int17: the fact that the one-spot is smokeless and is isentropic is not correct.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that the fact that it is smokeless and is isentropic is incorrect.; int18 & sent13 -> int19: the bypass is non-smokeless.; int19 & sent21 -> int20: that the markhor is not non-abundant but an intercourse is not right.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that that it is abundant and it is a kind of an intercourse is wrong.; int21 & sent19 -> int22: the valine does not bestrew caul.; int10 & int22 -> int23: the valine is a Siphonaptera and incoherent.; int23 -> int24: the valine is a kind of a Siphonaptera.; int24 & sent7 -> int25: the puller is a bastion but it is not Unitarian.; int9 & int25 -> int26: the puller is a policeman.; int8 & int26 -> int27: the puller is a longbow.;
$hypothesis$ = that the puller is not cyclopean and it is not skinless does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a longbow if it is a kind of a policeman. sent2: the bypass is not a bastion if the markhor is a kind of a policeman that is not Unitarian. sent3: the bypass is a Siphonaptera. sent4: that that the puller is not cyclopean but it is skinless is not wrong is wrong if the valine is not skinless. sent5: if a bastion is not a kind of a Unitarian it is a policeman. sent6: the bypass is cyclopean if it is a kind of a bastion. sent7: the puller is both a bastion and not a Unitarian if the valine is a Siphonaptera. sent8: that something is not non-smokeless and it is isentropic is wrong if it is not odorless. sent9: that the puller is a kind of cyclopean thing that is not skinless is not right if the valine is not skinless. sent10: if the markhor is a longbow then it is not a kind of a Unitarian. sent11: the bypass is a bastion if it is a Siphonaptera. sent12: if that something is not a kind of a condiment but it is odorless does not hold it is not odorless. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is smokeless and is isentropic is wrong then the bypass is not smokeless. sent14: something is non-Unitarian if that it is a longbow is not wrong. sent15: something is a Siphonaptera and it is incoherent if it does not bestrew caul. sent16: the bypass is not a bastion if the markhor is a kind of a policeman that is a Unitarian. sent17: the fact that the puller is both cyclopean and not skinless does not hold. sent18: if something is a kind of a longbow it is a kind of a policeman and it is not Unitarian. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is abundant and it is an intercourse does not hold then the valine does not bestrew caul. sent20: if the valine is not skinless then the fact that the puller is not cyclopean and it is not skinless is not right. sent21: the fact that the markhor is abundant thing that is an intercourse is not right if the bypass is not smokeless. sent22: there is nothing such that it is not a condiment but odorless. sent23: that the markhor is a longbow hold if the valine is not skinned. sent24: that the puller is both not cyclopean and skinless is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valine is skinless.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the markhor is a longbow.; sent18 -> int2: if the markhor is a kind of a longbow then it is a policeman and is not a kind of a Unitarian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the markhor is a policeman but it is not Unitarian.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the bypass is not a bastion is correct.; sent11 & sent3 -> int5: the bypass is a bastion.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the valine is not skinless.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__