if the Jersey purifies diencephalon the fact that it is not an audible and it scourges Londoner does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the Jersey is a kind of non-nonmechanical thing that is an italic is wrong if the diencephalon does not scourge bookbinder. sent2: that something is a kind of inaudible thing that scourges Londoner is incorrect if it does not scourge bookbinder. sent3: that the Jersey is a kind of nonmechanical thing that is testaceous is false if it scourges bookbinder. sent4: if the Jersey does purify diencephalon then it is not audible and it does scourge Londoner. sent5: if the Coloradan scourges bookbinder and does not purify diencephalon then the diencephalon does not scourges bookbinder. sent6: if the fact that something is both mechanical and testaceous does not hold it does not purify diencephalon. sent7: the fact that the Jersey is not nonmechanical but it is not non-testaceous is not correct if that it does scourge bookbinder is true. sent8: if the Jersey does not scourge bookbinder it is a kind of non-audible thing that scourges Londoner. sent9: the fact that the Jersey is audible thing that does scourge Londoner does not hold. sent10: the fact that the frontal is not nonmechanical but a freelancer does not hold if it referees. sent11: the fact that the Jersey is nonmechanical and testaceous is wrong. sent12: if the Coloradan does not scourge Londoner it does scourge bookbinder and it does not purify diencephalon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jersey does scourge bookbinder.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the Jersey is not nonmechanical but it is testaceous does not hold.; sent6 -> int2: if that the Jersey is mechanical but it is testaceous is wrong then it does not purify diencephalon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Jersey does not purify diencephalon.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Jersey does purify diencephalon.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Jersey does not scourge bookbinder.; sent2 -> int6: if the Jersey does not scourge bookbinder then that it is not audible and does scourge Londoner does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the Jersey is not an audible but it does scourge Londoner is not right.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the Jersey is not nonmechanical and is an italic is true is false.
$hypothesis$ = if the Jersey purifies diencephalon the fact that it is not an audible and it scourges Londoner does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Jersey is a kind of non-nonmechanical thing that is an italic is wrong if the diencephalon does not scourge bookbinder. sent2: that something is a kind of inaudible thing that scourges Londoner is incorrect if it does not scourge bookbinder. sent3: that the Jersey is a kind of nonmechanical thing that is testaceous is false if it scourges bookbinder. sent4: if the Jersey does purify diencephalon then it is not audible and it does scourge Londoner. sent5: if the Coloradan scourges bookbinder and does not purify diencephalon then the diencephalon does not scourges bookbinder. sent6: if the fact that something is both mechanical and testaceous does not hold it does not purify diencephalon. sent7: the fact that the Jersey is not nonmechanical but it is not non-testaceous is not correct if that it does scourge bookbinder is true. sent8: if the Jersey does not scourge bookbinder it is a kind of non-audible thing that scourges Londoner. sent9: the fact that the Jersey is audible thing that does scourge Londoner does not hold. sent10: the fact that the frontal is not nonmechanical but a freelancer does not hold if it referees. sent11: the fact that the Jersey is nonmechanical and testaceous is wrong. sent12: if the Coloradan does not scourge Londoner it does scourge bookbinder and it does not purify diencephalon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jersey does scourge bookbinder.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the Jersey is not nonmechanical but it is testaceous does not hold.; sent6 -> int2: if that the Jersey is mechanical but it is testaceous is wrong then it does not purify diencephalon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Jersey does not purify diencephalon.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Jersey does purify diencephalon.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Jersey does not scourge bookbinder.; sent2 -> int6: if the Jersey does not scourge bookbinder then that it is not audible and does scourge Londoner does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the Jersey is not an audible but it does scourge Londoner is not right.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__