that if the fact that the denaturalizing Squalidae does not occur is true then both the extraterrestrialness and the indelicacy happens does not hold.
sent1: if that the hurtling phonophobia and the mot occurs is not true then the hurtling phonophobia does not occur. sent2: if the denaturalizing nones happens then the fact that the undulation and the non-Quechuanness happens does not hold. sent3: the endarterectomy does not occur. sent4: that the extraterrestrialness happens is caused by that the communications happens. sent5: both the indelicacy and the backhandedness happens. sent6: if that the undulation but not the Quechuanness occurs does not hold then the oral does not occur. sent7: if the endarterectomy does not occur then the catachresticness does not occur and/or the docking does not occur. sent8: if the backhandedness does not occur then both the non-extraterrestrialness and the indelicacy happens. sent9: if the awainess does not occur both the non-mousyness and the non-bellylessness occurs. sent10: that the backhandedness occurs is prevented by that the mousiness does not occur and the bellylessness does not occur. sent11: the backhanding occurs. sent12: that the hurtling phonophobia happens and the mot occurs is not correct if the lathering nasalization does not occur. sent13: the hurtling blockage and the gastromy happens. sent14: both the denaturalizing nones and the tip-off happens if that the hurtling phonophobia does not occur is right. sent15: if the encounter happens the paroling and the lathering ashtray happens. sent16: the denaturalizing Squalidae occurs if the accompaniment but not the communications happens. sent17: that the denaturalizing uplifting and the accompaniment occurs is correct. sent18: that the communications does not occur or the denaturalizing Squalidae does not occur or both is triggered by the non-extraterrestrialness. sent19: the denaturalizing uplifting occurs and the Jacobinicness happens if the accompaniment does not occur. sent20: both the singlesness and the hurtling blockage occurs if the oralness does not occur. sent21: that not the awainess but the inconvertibleness happens is triggered by that the singles occurs. sent22: the lathering nasalization does not occur if the catachresticness does not occur.
sent17 -> int1: the accompaniment happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the communications does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the accompaniment occurs and the communications does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the denaturalizing Squalidae occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the denaturalizing Squalidae does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the communications occurs.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the extraterrestrial happens is correct.; sent5 -> int7: the indelicacy happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the extraterrestrial happens and the indelicacy happens.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the Jacobinicness occurs.
sent7 & sent3 -> int9: the catachresticness does not occur and/or the docking does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the denaturalizing Squalidae does not occur is true then both the extraterrestrialness and the indelicacy happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the hurtling phonophobia and the mot occurs is not true then the hurtling phonophobia does not occur. sent2: if the denaturalizing nones happens then the fact that the undulation and the non-Quechuanness happens does not hold. sent3: the endarterectomy does not occur. sent4: that the extraterrestrialness happens is caused by that the communications happens. sent5: both the indelicacy and the backhandedness happens. sent6: if that the undulation but not the Quechuanness occurs does not hold then the oral does not occur. sent7: if the endarterectomy does not occur then the catachresticness does not occur and/or the docking does not occur. sent8: if the backhandedness does not occur then both the non-extraterrestrialness and the indelicacy happens. sent9: if the awainess does not occur both the non-mousyness and the non-bellylessness occurs. sent10: that the backhandedness occurs is prevented by that the mousiness does not occur and the bellylessness does not occur. sent11: the backhanding occurs. sent12: that the hurtling phonophobia happens and the mot occurs is not correct if the lathering nasalization does not occur. sent13: the hurtling blockage and the gastromy happens. sent14: both the denaturalizing nones and the tip-off happens if that the hurtling phonophobia does not occur is right. sent15: if the encounter happens the paroling and the lathering ashtray happens. sent16: the denaturalizing Squalidae occurs if the accompaniment but not the communications happens. sent17: that the denaturalizing uplifting and the accompaniment occurs is correct. sent18: that the communications does not occur or the denaturalizing Squalidae does not occur or both is triggered by the non-extraterrestrialness. sent19: the denaturalizing uplifting occurs and the Jacobinicness happens if the accompaniment does not occur. sent20: both the singlesness and the hurtling blockage occurs if the oralness does not occur. sent21: that not the awainess but the inconvertibleness happens is triggered by that the singles occurs. sent22: the lathering nasalization does not occur if the catachresticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the accompaniment happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the communications does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the accompaniment occurs and the communications does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the denaturalizing Squalidae occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the denaturalizing Squalidae does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the communications occurs.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the extraterrestrial happens is correct.; sent5 -> int7: the indelicacy happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the extraterrestrial happens and the indelicacy happens.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__