the inspissation does not occur.
sent1: the jawlessness triggers the impersonating sumo. sent2: the arithmeticalness happens. sent3: the inspissation occurs if the impersonating sumo happens. sent4: if the impersonating sumo does not occur that the fact that both the non-jawlessness and the non-incontinentness happens does not hold hold. sent5: the unwrapping belemnite occurs. sent6: that the piece happens is triggered by that the reshuffling does not occur and/or that the piece occurs. sent7: the incontinentness occurs. sent8: if both the piecing and the non-oatenness happens then the impersonating sumo does not occur. sent9: both the dermatologicness and the pistillateness occurs. sent10: the jawlessness happens and the incontinentness happens.
sent10 -> int1: the jawlessness occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the impersonating sumo happens.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the inspissation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the inspissation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the jawlessness triggers the impersonating sumo. sent2: the arithmeticalness happens. sent3: the inspissation occurs if the impersonating sumo happens. sent4: if the impersonating sumo does not occur that the fact that both the non-jawlessness and the non-incontinentness happens does not hold hold. sent5: the unwrapping belemnite occurs. sent6: that the piece happens is triggered by that the reshuffling does not occur and/or that the piece occurs. sent7: the incontinentness occurs. sent8: if both the piecing and the non-oatenness happens then the impersonating sumo does not occur. sent9: both the dermatologicness and the pistillateness occurs. sent10: the jawlessness happens and the incontinentness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the jawlessness occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the impersonating sumo happens.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__