the cote is not pneumonic.
sent1: the Silex is a uncommonness if the dudeen is a devices. sent2: if the Silex is a uncommonness then the cote is not non-pneumonic. sent3: something does ossify if it is not a kind of a Norman. sent4: if the fact that something is both cupric and not a Norman does not hold then it is not pneumonic. sent5: the absorbate is cupric if the ionosphere is a Norman. sent6: if that the dudeen is not a uncommonness but it is a devices does not hold then the absorbate does not ossify. sent7: the ionosphere does not ossify. sent8: the fact that something is not a uncommonness but it is a kind of a devices is not correct if that it is not lethargic hold. sent9: if the absorbate is cupric then the dudeen is a devices.
sent3 -> int1: if the ionosphere is not a kind of a Norman then the fact that it ossifies is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ionosphere is not a kind of a Norman.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the ionosphere does ossify is correct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ionosphere is Norman.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the absorbate is cupric.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the dudeen is a devices hold.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the Silex is a uncommonness.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the cote is not pneumonic is correct.
sent4 -> int8: if that the cote is cupric but it is not a Norman is not right it is non-pneumonic.; sent8 -> int9: the fact that the dudeen is not a uncommonness and is a devices is not correct if it is not lethargic.;
$hypothesis$ = the cote is not pneumonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the Silex is a uncommonness if the dudeen is a devices. sent2: if the Silex is a uncommonness then the cote is not non-pneumonic. sent3: something does ossify if it is not a kind of a Norman. sent4: if the fact that something is both cupric and not a Norman does not hold then it is not pneumonic. sent5: the absorbate is cupric if the ionosphere is a Norman. sent6: if that the dudeen is not a uncommonness but it is a devices does not hold then the absorbate does not ossify. sent7: the ionosphere does not ossify. sent8: the fact that something is not a uncommonness but it is a kind of a devices is not correct if that it is not lethargic hold. sent9: if the absorbate is cupric then the dudeen is a devices. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the ionosphere is not a kind of a Norman then the fact that it ossifies is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ionosphere is not a kind of a Norman.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the ionosphere does ossify is correct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ionosphere is Norman.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the absorbate is cupric.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the dudeen is a devices hold.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the Silex is a uncommonness.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__