the fact that the distributary is not a Sinitic is not false.
sent1: the distributary is not a hindsight. sent2: the Junkers is dishonorable but it does not agree. sent3: the distributary does not exacerbate lunch. sent4: if the SC is a kind of an overvaluation that is not unclear then the fact that it is a Sinitic is true. sent5: the distributary is dishonorable. sent6: the hooker is Sinitic. sent7: the distributary is not a kind of a fussiness. sent8: something is auscultatory if it is cementitious and does not discard Junkers. sent9: the distributary is a kind of an invader but it is not a venter. sent10: something that is not a kind of a muezzin is both not a fussiness and dishonorable. sent11: the distributary is unsinkable. sent12: the Bhutanese is dishonorable. sent13: if the fact that the micrometeorite is not a muezzin and does exacerbate Mullus is not true then the distributary is not a kind of a muezzin. sent14: if something that is not honorable is not a kind of a fussiness it is a kind of a Sinitic.
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: that the distributary is not honorable and is not a fussiness is right.; sent14 -> int2: if the distributary is dishonorable and not a fussiness then it is Sinitic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the distributary is not a Sinitic hold.
sent10 -> int3: if the distributary is not a muezzin it is not a kind of a fussiness and is dishonorable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the distributary is not a Sinitic is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the distributary is not a hindsight. sent2: the Junkers is dishonorable but it does not agree. sent3: the distributary does not exacerbate lunch. sent4: if the SC is a kind of an overvaluation that is not unclear then the fact that it is a Sinitic is true. sent5: the distributary is dishonorable. sent6: the hooker is Sinitic. sent7: the distributary is not a kind of a fussiness. sent8: something is auscultatory if it is cementitious and does not discard Junkers. sent9: the distributary is a kind of an invader but it is not a venter. sent10: something that is not a kind of a muezzin is both not a fussiness and dishonorable. sent11: the distributary is unsinkable. sent12: the Bhutanese is dishonorable. sent13: if the fact that the micrometeorite is not a muezzin and does exacerbate Mullus is not true then the distributary is not a kind of a muezzin. sent14: if something that is not honorable is not a kind of a fussiness it is a kind of a Sinitic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: that the distributary is not honorable and is not a fussiness is right.; sent14 -> int2: if the distributary is dishonorable and not a fussiness then it is Sinitic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__