the objecting Nymphalidae does not occur.
sent1: the headquartering cryobiology prevents the unwearableness. sent2: the incarnation does not occur. sent3: that the incarnation does not occur and the passive occurs is brought about by that the unwearableness does not occur. sent4: if the gregariousness happens then the fact that both the authorization and the non-smokiness happens is not right. sent5: the pneumaticness occurs if the picturing happens. sent6: the headquartering cryobiology and the Hell occurs if the decaying does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the authorization and the non-smokyness happens is not right the authorization does not occur. sent8: the objecting Nymphalidae happens if the fact that the passive but not the sneering occurs does not hold. sent9: the smokiness happens. sent10: the nonwashableness does not occur. sent11: the decaying does not occur if the fact that the offstageness happens and the decaying occurs is false. sent12: the objecting Nymphalidae does not occur if either the pneumaticness happens or the picturing happens or both. sent13: if the incarnation does not occur the dinging mucosa does not occur. sent14: if the outgeneraling Ruth occurs the objecting Bolshevism happens. sent15: the bridgeableness does not occur if the fact that the bridgeableness but not the objecting disquieted occurs is wrong. sent16: the pneumaticness or that the authorization occurs or both brings about the non-gregariousness. sent17: that the dinging mucosa does not occur and the smokiness occurs is not true if the gregariousness does not occur. sent18: if the dinging Actinidiaceae occurs then the eclipse happens. sent19: that the sneering does not occur is brought about by that the incarnation does not occur but the passive occurs. sent20: if the picturing does not occur then the fact that the passive but not the sneer happens is not right. sent21: that the offstageness and the decaying occurs is wrong if the bridgeableness does not occur. sent22: that the Capetianness occurs is prevented by the non-tacticalness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the picturing occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the pneumaticness happens.; int1 -> int2: the pneumaticness and/or the authorization happens.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the gregariousness does not occur.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: that not the dinging mucosa but the smokiness occurs is false.; sent13 & sent2 -> int5: the dinging mucosa does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: not the dinging mucosa but the smokiness occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the picturing does not occur.; int8 & sent20 -> int9: that the fact that the passive occurs but the sneer does not occur is not true is right.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the objecting Nymphalidae does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the objecting Nymphalidae does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the headquartering cryobiology prevents the unwearableness. sent2: the incarnation does not occur. sent3: that the incarnation does not occur and the passive occurs is brought about by that the unwearableness does not occur. sent4: if the gregariousness happens then the fact that both the authorization and the non-smokiness happens is not right. sent5: the pneumaticness occurs if the picturing happens. sent6: the headquartering cryobiology and the Hell occurs if the decaying does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the authorization and the non-smokyness happens is not right the authorization does not occur. sent8: the objecting Nymphalidae happens if the fact that the passive but not the sneering occurs does not hold. sent9: the smokiness happens. sent10: the nonwashableness does not occur. sent11: the decaying does not occur if the fact that the offstageness happens and the decaying occurs is false. sent12: the objecting Nymphalidae does not occur if either the pneumaticness happens or the picturing happens or both. sent13: if the incarnation does not occur the dinging mucosa does not occur. sent14: if the outgeneraling Ruth occurs the objecting Bolshevism happens. sent15: the bridgeableness does not occur if the fact that the bridgeableness but not the objecting disquieted occurs is wrong. sent16: the pneumaticness or that the authorization occurs or both brings about the non-gregariousness. sent17: that the dinging mucosa does not occur and the smokiness occurs is not true if the gregariousness does not occur. sent18: if the dinging Actinidiaceae occurs then the eclipse happens. sent19: that the sneering does not occur is brought about by that the incarnation does not occur but the passive occurs. sent20: if the picturing does not occur then the fact that the passive but not the sneer happens is not right. sent21: that the offstageness and the decaying occurs is wrong if the bridgeableness does not occur. sent22: that the Capetianness occurs is prevented by the non-tacticalness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the picturing occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the pneumaticness happens.; int1 -> int2: the pneumaticness and/or the authorization happens.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the gregariousness does not occur.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: that not the dinging mucosa but the smokiness occurs is false.; sent13 & sent2 -> int5: the dinging mucosa does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: not the dinging mucosa but the smokiness occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the picturing does not occur.; int8 & sent20 -> int9: that the fact that the passive occurs but the sneer does not occur is not true is right.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__