the fact that that the litigant is a kind of a commuter is correct if the fowler is a buckskin is false.
sent1: the hypocrite is not triclinic but rounded. sent2: if the hypocrite is both not triclinic and rounded the fowler is a combustible. sent3: something is a buckskin. sent4: the hypocrite is a rounded. sent5: if something that is a combustible is a kind of a buckskin the litigant is a kind of a commuter.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the fowler is combustible.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fowler is a buckskin is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fowler is a kind of combustible thing that is a buckskin.; int2 -> int3: something is both a combustible and a buckskin.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the litigant is a commuter.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the litigant is a kind of a commuter is correct if the fowler is a buckskin is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the hypocrite is not triclinic but rounded. sent2: if the hypocrite is both not triclinic and rounded the fowler is a combustible. sent3: something is a buckskin. sent4: the hypocrite is a rounded. sent5: if something that is a combustible is a kind of a buckskin the litigant is a kind of a commuter. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the fowler is combustible.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fowler is a buckskin is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fowler is a kind of combustible thing that is a buckskin.; int2 -> int3: something is both a combustible and a buckskin.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the litigant is a commuter.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__