the rolling occurs.
sent1: the fact that both the incommensurateness and the nagging occurs is false if the summeriness does not occur. sent2: the incommensurateness does not occur and/or the nagging does not occur. sent3: the nagging occurs if that the rolling but not the anuranness happens does not hold. sent4: the anuranness does not occur. sent5: that the nagging occurs is prevented by that the incommensurateness does not occur and/or the nagging does not occur. sent6: the fact that the rolling and the anuranness occurs is not correct. sent7: that the anuranness occurs brings about the nagging.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the rolling and the non-anuranness happens is incorrect.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the nagging occurs.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the nagging does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the rolling but not the anuranness occurs.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the rolling does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the rolling occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the incommensurateness and the nagging occurs is false if the summeriness does not occur. sent2: the incommensurateness does not occur and/or the nagging does not occur. sent3: the nagging occurs if that the rolling but not the anuranness happens does not hold. sent4: the anuranness does not occur. sent5: that the nagging occurs is prevented by that the incommensurateness does not occur and/or the nagging does not occur. sent6: the fact that the rolling and the anuranness occurs is not correct. sent7: that the anuranness occurs brings about the nagging. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the rolling and the non-anuranness happens is incorrect.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the nagging occurs.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the nagging does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the rolling but not the anuranness occurs.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__