if the lambkin is not a faithful then the radiographer is a contradistinction and does tunnel Belarusian.
sent1: the radiographer is a Weimaraner if it does tunnel malocclusion. sent2: the radiographer does not tunnel malocclusion and does tunnel erethism if that the lambkin does not tunnel Belarusian is not incorrect. sent3: the radiographer does not tunnel erethism if the lambkin is not a Weimaraner. sent4: The Belarusian tunnels radiographer. sent5: the lambkin tunnels malocclusion and tunnels erethism. sent6: the latke does not tunnel Belarusian. sent7: that the lambkin tunnels malocclusion hold if it does not tunnel erethism and is a Weimaraner. sent8: something is Rabelaisian if it does galumph. sent9: the fact that the latke is a kind of a contradistinction is not false. sent10: the radiographer is a faithful if it is a Weimaraner and is a synchrocyclotron. sent11: the radiographer does operate. sent12: the radiographer is a contradistinction and does tunnel Belarusian if the lambkin is a kind of a faithful. sent13: the latke tunnels malocclusion. sent14: if something does not debut lecherousness and tunnels erethism it is a faithful. sent15: the lambkin tunnels erethism. sent16: if the fact that the latke is a kind of non-faithful thing that is not a contradistinction is not right the Africander is a contradistinction. sent17: if something is a kind of a synchrocyclotron the fact that it is not a kind of a faithful and it is not a kind of a contradistinction is not right. sent18: something is a contradistinction if it is a Weimaraner. sent19: the radiographer tunnels malocclusion if the latke is a synchrocyclotron. sent20: the radiographer tunnels Belarusian. sent21: the lambkin is a kind of a contradistinction. sent22: something is a Weimaraner if it does tunnel Belarusian and it is a kind of a synchrocyclotron.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the latke is not a synchrocyclotron.; sent14 -> int1: if the lambkin does not debut lecherousness but it does tunnel erethism then it is a faithful.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lambkin is not a faithful.; sent18 -> int2: that if the radiographer is the Weimaraner then the radiographer is a contradistinction is not wrong.;
the Africander is a kind of a contradistinction.
sent17 -> int3: that the lambkin is both not a faithful and not a contradistinction does not hold if it is a kind of a synchrocyclotron.;
$hypothesis$ = if the lambkin is not a faithful then the radiographer is a contradistinction and does tunnel Belarusian. ; $context$ = sent1: the radiographer is a Weimaraner if it does tunnel malocclusion. sent2: the radiographer does not tunnel malocclusion and does tunnel erethism if that the lambkin does not tunnel Belarusian is not incorrect. sent3: the radiographer does not tunnel erethism if the lambkin is not a Weimaraner. sent4: The Belarusian tunnels radiographer. sent5: the lambkin tunnels malocclusion and tunnels erethism. sent6: the latke does not tunnel Belarusian. sent7: that the lambkin tunnels malocclusion hold if it does not tunnel erethism and is a Weimaraner. sent8: something is Rabelaisian if it does galumph. sent9: the fact that the latke is a kind of a contradistinction is not false. sent10: the radiographer is a faithful if it is a Weimaraner and is a synchrocyclotron. sent11: the radiographer does operate. sent12: the radiographer is a contradistinction and does tunnel Belarusian if the lambkin is a kind of a faithful. sent13: the latke tunnels malocclusion. sent14: if something does not debut lecherousness and tunnels erethism it is a faithful. sent15: the lambkin tunnels erethism. sent16: if the fact that the latke is a kind of non-faithful thing that is not a contradistinction is not right the Africander is a contradistinction. sent17: if something is a kind of a synchrocyclotron the fact that it is not a kind of a faithful and it is not a kind of a contradistinction is not right. sent18: something is a contradistinction if it is a Weimaraner. sent19: the radiographer tunnels malocclusion if the latke is a synchrocyclotron. sent20: the radiographer tunnels Belarusian. sent21: the lambkin is a kind of a contradistinction. sent22: something is a Weimaraner if it does tunnel Belarusian and it is a kind of a synchrocyclotron. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the latke is not a synchrocyclotron.; sent14 -> int1: if the lambkin does not debut lecherousness but it does tunnel erethism then it is a faithful.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lambkin is not a faithful.; sent18 -> int2: that if the radiographer is the Weimaraner then the radiographer is a contradistinction is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__