the fact that if the fact that the acting occurs is not incorrect the agrobiologicness occurs is not right.
sent1: if the fact that the ballisticsness happens but the restraint does not occur is not true the agrobiologicness occurs. sent2: the fact that that the disabusing Humulin does not occur is caused by that both the snowboarding and the referring occurs hold. sent3: that the disabusing musnud does not occur brings about the non-capitularness and/or the manifesting extrovert. sent4: if the capitularness occurs and the disabusing musnud occurs the fact that the acting does not occur hold. sent5: either the non-capitularness or that the manifesting extrovert happens or both triggers that the manifesting extrovert happens. sent6: that the ballisticsness happens but the restraint does not occur does not hold if the capitularness does not occur. sent7: the incarnation happens. sent8: the disabusing musnud occurs. sent9: if the causing occurs the fact that the thermogravimetry does not occur but the agrobiologicness occurs is not correct. sent10: that the fact that the manifesting extrovert happens but the disabusing buttermilk does not occur is right is incorrect if that the dumping does not occur is right. sent11: if the ballisticsness does not occur then the agrobiologicness occurs. sent12: the melodizing does not occur. sent13: the prenatalness and the mistral occurs. sent14: the overdosing occurs. sent15: the nonrepresentationalness occurs. sent16: the fact that the acting happens is not incorrect if the capitularness occurs and the disabusing musnud occurs. sent17: the disabusing musnud does not occur if the ballisticsness does not occur and the acting does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acting happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the capitularness happens.; assump2 & sent8 -> int1: the capitularness and the disabusing musnud occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the acting does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the capitularness does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: that the ballisticsness happens and the restraint does not occur is wrong.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the agrobiologicness occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the manifesting extrovert occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fact that the acting occurs is not incorrect the agrobiologicness occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the ballisticsness happens but the restraint does not occur is not true the agrobiologicness occurs. sent2: the fact that that the disabusing Humulin does not occur is caused by that both the snowboarding and the referring occurs hold. sent3: that the disabusing musnud does not occur brings about the non-capitularness and/or the manifesting extrovert. sent4: if the capitularness occurs and the disabusing musnud occurs the fact that the acting does not occur hold. sent5: either the non-capitularness or that the manifesting extrovert happens or both triggers that the manifesting extrovert happens. sent6: that the ballisticsness happens but the restraint does not occur does not hold if the capitularness does not occur. sent7: the incarnation happens. sent8: the disabusing musnud occurs. sent9: if the causing occurs the fact that the thermogravimetry does not occur but the agrobiologicness occurs is not correct. sent10: that the fact that the manifesting extrovert happens but the disabusing buttermilk does not occur is right is incorrect if that the dumping does not occur is right. sent11: if the ballisticsness does not occur then the agrobiologicness occurs. sent12: the melodizing does not occur. sent13: the prenatalness and the mistral occurs. sent14: the overdosing occurs. sent15: the nonrepresentationalness occurs. sent16: the fact that the acting happens is not incorrect if the capitularness occurs and the disabusing musnud occurs. sent17: the disabusing musnud does not occur if the ballisticsness does not occur and the acting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acting happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the capitularness happens.; assump2 & sent8 -> int1: the capitularness and the disabusing musnud occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the acting does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the capitularness does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: that the ballisticsness happens and the restraint does not occur is wrong.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the agrobiologicness occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__