there exists something such that if it does peruse partygoer it is Markovian.
sent1: if the hearthrug is igneous then it does not peruse partygoer. sent2: if the hearthrug does not overshoot but it vacuums Leguminosae then it is igneous. sent3: the hearthrug is a Fabianism. sent4: the hearthrug is Markovian if it is igneous and it does brief forefront. sent5: the hearthrug is not igneous. sent6: something that is not a kind of an overshot is igneous thing that is Uzbekistani. sent7: that the hearthrug is igneous thing that does brief forefront is wrong. sent8: the hearthrug is igneous if the fact that it is not Huxleyan and it does imbue is incorrect. sent9: if something that peruses partygoer is Markovian then the tetrahalide does not brief automat. sent10: if something is igneous thing that briefs forefront it is Markovian. sent11: that the hearthrug does not peruse partygoer is not false if that that it is non-igneous thing that briefs forefront is true is incorrect. sent12: if something is non-igneous but it does brief forefront then it is Markovian. sent13: the hearthrug is not cross-ply. sent14: if that the hearthrug is not igneous but it does brief forefront is false it does peruse partygoer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hearthrug is a kind of non-igneous thing that briefs forefront is not true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the hearthrug does not peruse partygoer.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hearthrug peruses partygoer.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the hearthrug is not igneous but it briefs forefront.; sent12 -> int4: if the hearthrug is not igneous but it does brief forefront then it is Markovian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hearthrug is Markovian.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the hearthrug is Markovian if it peruses partygoer.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the tetrahalide does not brief automat but it is igneous.
sent6 -> int7: if the duckboard is not an overshot it is igneous and it is Uzbekistani.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does peruse partygoer it is Markovian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hearthrug is igneous then it does not peruse partygoer. sent2: if the hearthrug does not overshoot but it vacuums Leguminosae then it is igneous. sent3: the hearthrug is a Fabianism. sent4: the hearthrug is Markovian if it is igneous and it does brief forefront. sent5: the hearthrug is not igneous. sent6: something that is not a kind of an overshot is igneous thing that is Uzbekistani. sent7: that the hearthrug is igneous thing that does brief forefront is wrong. sent8: the hearthrug is igneous if the fact that it is not Huxleyan and it does imbue is incorrect. sent9: if something that peruses partygoer is Markovian then the tetrahalide does not brief automat. sent10: if something is igneous thing that briefs forefront it is Markovian. sent11: that the hearthrug does not peruse partygoer is not false if that that it is non-igneous thing that briefs forefront is true is incorrect. sent12: if something is non-igneous but it does brief forefront then it is Markovian. sent13: the hearthrug is not cross-ply. sent14: if that the hearthrug is not igneous but it does brief forefront is false it does peruse partygoer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hearthrug is a kind of non-igneous thing that briefs forefront is not true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the hearthrug does not peruse partygoer.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hearthrug peruses partygoer.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the hearthrug is not igneous but it briefs forefront.; sent12 -> int4: if the hearthrug is not igneous but it does brief forefront then it is Markovian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hearthrug is Markovian.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the hearthrug is Markovian if it peruses partygoer.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__