if the fact that the mesenchyme does not compact skinned but it does investigate Viverridae is right the mealberry does not scrimp.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a auricle and does scrimp the monastery is a kind of an ordeal. sent2: the mealberry scrimps if the mesenchyme does not compact skinned but it does investigate Viverridae. sent3: the monastery is not an ordeal and does not sparkle payola. sent4: if there is something such that it does not compact skinned and it does investigate Viverridae the mealberry is a auricle. sent5: something does compact skinned and it investigates Viverridae. sent6: if the monastery is an ordeal that does not scrimp the mealberry is not philharmonic. sent7: if the mealberry is not a sailing-race then it is both a wheelbase and insentient. sent8: the damson is extensile if that either the best is not ineffective or it is not a Goddard or both is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it investigates Viverridae hold. sent10: something that does not sparkle payola is a kind of a auricle that sparkles Ruptiliocarpon. sent11: if the damson is extensile then the monastery is an ordeal that does not scrimp. sent12: the mealberry does not sparkle payola if it is insentient. sent13: there exists something such that it is a kind of a auricle. sent14: there is something such that it scrimps. sent15: the mesenchyme does investigate Viverridae. sent16: the monastery does not sparkle payola. sent17: something does not compact skinned. sent18: the fact that the mealberry does not scrimp hold if the mesenchyme compacts skinned and does investigate Viverridae.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mesenchyme does not compact skinned and investigates Viverridae.; assump1 -> int1: something does not compact skinned but it investigates Viverridae.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the mealberry is a kind of a auricle.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mealberry does scrimp.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: the mealberry is a auricle and it scrimps.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a auricle and does scrimp.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the monastery is an ordeal.; sent3 -> int6: the monastery is not a kind of an ordeal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the mealberry does not scrimp.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
something is not philharmonic but it does sparkle Ruptiliocarpon.
sent10 -> int9: if the fact that the mealberry does not sparkle payola is right it is a kind of a auricle and sparkles Ruptiliocarpon.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the mesenchyme does not compact skinned but it does investigate Viverridae is right the mealberry does not scrimp. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a auricle and does scrimp the monastery is a kind of an ordeal. sent2: the mealberry scrimps if the mesenchyme does not compact skinned but it does investigate Viverridae. sent3: the monastery is not an ordeal and does not sparkle payola. sent4: if there is something such that it does not compact skinned and it does investigate Viverridae the mealberry is a auricle. sent5: something does compact skinned and it investigates Viverridae. sent6: if the monastery is an ordeal that does not scrimp the mealberry is not philharmonic. sent7: if the mealberry is not a sailing-race then it is both a wheelbase and insentient. sent8: the damson is extensile if that either the best is not ineffective or it is not a Goddard or both is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it investigates Viverridae hold. sent10: something that does not sparkle payola is a kind of a auricle that sparkles Ruptiliocarpon. sent11: if the damson is extensile then the monastery is an ordeal that does not scrimp. sent12: the mealberry does not sparkle payola if it is insentient. sent13: there exists something such that it is a kind of a auricle. sent14: there is something such that it scrimps. sent15: the mesenchyme does investigate Viverridae. sent16: the monastery does not sparkle payola. sent17: something does not compact skinned. sent18: the fact that the mealberry does not scrimp hold if the mesenchyme compacts skinned and does investigate Viverridae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mesenchyme does not compact skinned and investigates Viverridae.; assump1 -> int1: something does not compact skinned but it investigates Viverridae.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the mealberry is a kind of a auricle.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mealberry does scrimp.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: the mealberry is a auricle and it scrimps.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a auricle and does scrimp.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the monastery is an ordeal.; sent3 -> int6: the monastery is not a kind of an ordeal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the mealberry does not scrimp.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__