the hammertoe does not look pteridology.
sent1: if that the hammertoe is not a kind of a campanile and looks pteridology is not right that it is comfortable hold. sent2: that the condor bodes and it looks pteridology does not hold. sent3: the condor is unconventional. sent4: that the condor does not bode and is comfortable is not true if it is piezoelectric. sent5: the fact that the condor does bode and it is comfortable does not hold if it is piezoelectric. sent6: if something is a imbrication it is piezoelectric. sent7: if something is a kind of a imbrication then it is a conflict. sent8: something is a campanile if the fact that it does not bode and it is comfortable is incorrect. sent9: that the condor is piezoelectric is true. sent10: something is a trump if it is a kind of a campanile. sent11: if the cartouche is a campanile then that it does not vulcanize and is isomorphous is not correct. sent12: the fact that the condor does not permit chintz and recedes is not right. sent13: the fact that the berm is not a imbrication is right. sent14: the hammertoe does trump. sent15: if the condor does trump the hammertoe is unconventional. sent16: the hammertoe is a imbrication if it is unconventional. sent17: if the fact that the hammertoe is a conflict is not wrong then it looks pteridology. sent18: if the absorbent looks skate it is piezoelectric. sent19: if the fact that the hammertoe does not bode but it is a conflict is wrong that it is a campanile is not incorrect.
sent8 -> int1: the condor is a campanile if the fact that it does not bode and it is comfortable does not hold.; sent4 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the condor does not bode and is comfortable does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the condor is a campanile.; sent10 -> int4: the condor is a kind of a trump if it is a campanile.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the condor is a kind of a trump.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the hammertoe is unconventional.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the hammertoe is a kind of a imbrication.; sent7 -> int8: if the hammertoe is a imbrication then it conflicts.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the hammertoe is a conflict.; int9 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the hammertoe does not look pteridology.
sent13 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not a imbrication.;
$hypothesis$ = the hammertoe does not look pteridology. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the hammertoe is not a kind of a campanile and looks pteridology is not right that it is comfortable hold. sent2: that the condor bodes and it looks pteridology does not hold. sent3: the condor is unconventional. sent4: that the condor does not bode and is comfortable is not true if it is piezoelectric. sent5: the fact that the condor does bode and it is comfortable does not hold if it is piezoelectric. sent6: if something is a imbrication it is piezoelectric. sent7: if something is a kind of a imbrication then it is a conflict. sent8: something is a campanile if the fact that it does not bode and it is comfortable is incorrect. sent9: that the condor is piezoelectric is true. sent10: something is a trump if it is a kind of a campanile. sent11: if the cartouche is a campanile then that it does not vulcanize and is isomorphous is not correct. sent12: the fact that the condor does not permit chintz and recedes is not right. sent13: the fact that the berm is not a imbrication is right. sent14: the hammertoe does trump. sent15: if the condor does trump the hammertoe is unconventional. sent16: the hammertoe is a imbrication if it is unconventional. sent17: if the fact that the hammertoe is a conflict is not wrong then it looks pteridology. sent18: if the absorbent looks skate it is piezoelectric. sent19: if the fact that the hammertoe does not bode but it is a conflict is wrong that it is a campanile is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the condor is a campanile if the fact that it does not bode and it is comfortable does not hold.; sent4 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the condor does not bode and is comfortable does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the condor is a campanile.; sent10 -> int4: the condor is a kind of a trump if it is a campanile.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the condor is a kind of a trump.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the hammertoe is unconventional.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the hammertoe is a kind of a imbrication.; sent7 -> int8: if the hammertoe is a imbrication then it conflicts.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the hammertoe is a conflict.; int9 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__