that the lunching is French and it is a carpenter is wrong.
sent1: the Court does not parry if something is a kind of a plain but it is not anisogametic. sent2: if the telegraphy is a kind of a upholsterer it parries. sent3: the rink is a kind of plain thing that is not anisogametic. sent4: the fact that the Sodom does squinch psychotherapist and does predate wrecker does not hold. sent5: the fact that the speck is immodest and does parry is false. sent6: the telegraphy is not non-isotropic if that the Court is non-isotropic is not incorrect. sent7: if the environmentalist does carpenter then the lunching is isotropic. sent8: if something is both isotropic and immodest then it does not squinch evanescence. sent9: something either is isotropic or is a upholsterer or both if it is not a kind of a parry. sent10: the fact that the environmentalist does not blackmail Worcestershire but it is a Tobagonian is not right if there exists something such that it does not squinch evanescence. sent11: that the environmentalist is a upholsterer but it is not isotropic does not hold. sent12: the lunching carpenters if the telegraphy does parry. sent13: that the telegraphy is a Polypedatidae and is non-immodest is not true if the Worcestershire does predate arrowsmith. sent14: if something does predate arrowsmith or it is not a Polypedatidae or both it is French. sent15: there is something such that it does blackmail Worcestershire and is not a kind of a Polypedatidae. sent16: if something is a Tobagonian it is immodest. sent17: the telegraphy parries. sent18: if that the wrecker blackmails Worcestershire is not wrong it does squinch evanescence. sent19: The Worcestershire does blackmail wrecker. sent20: if the fact that something is a Polypedatidae but it is not immodest is wrong it is immodest. sent21: that the lunching is not a Polypedatidae if the speck is both not non-immodest and isotropic is correct. sent22: the lunching is immodest if it predates arrowsmith and/or it does not squinch evanescence. sent23: if there exists something such that that the fact that it does not blackmail Worcestershire and is a Tobagonian hold does not hold the speck blackmail Worcestershire. sent24: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a upholsterer and it is not isotropic does not hold the speck is isotropic. sent25: that the wrecker is not a French if there is something such that it does blackmail Worcestershire is not false. sent26: the speck is immodest if either it squinches evanescence or it does not carpenter or both. sent27: the speck is Tobagonian if the wrecker does squinch evanescence. sent28: the wrecker does blackmail Worcestershire. sent29: the Worcestershire does predate arrowsmith if there is something such that that it squinches psychotherapist and it predates wrecker is incorrect.
sent18 & sent28 -> int1: the wrecker squinches evanescence.; int1 & sent27 -> int2: the speck is a kind of a Tobagonian.; sent16 -> int3: the fact that if the speck is Tobagonian the speck is immodest is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the speck is immodest.; sent11 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is a upholsterer and it is not isotropic is false.; int5 & sent24 -> int6: the speck is isotropic.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the speck is a kind of immodest thing that is isotropic.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the lunching is not a Polypedatidae.; int8 -> int9: the lunching either predates arrowsmith or is not a kind of a Polypedatidae or both.; sent14 -> int10: the lunching is not non-French if either it does predate arrowsmith or it is not a Polypedatidae or both.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the lunching Frenches hold.; sent12 & sent17 -> int12: the lunching is a kind of a carpenter.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
that the lunching is not non-French but a carpenter is wrong.
sent8 -> int13: if the telegraphy is isotropic and it is immodest it does not squinch evanescence.; sent9 -> int14: the Court is either isotropic or a upholsterer or both if it does not parry.; sent3 -> int15: there exists something such that it is plain thing that is not anisogametic.; int15 & sent1 -> int16: the Court is not a parry.; int14 & int16 -> int17: the Court is isotropic or is a upholsterer or both.; sent20 -> int18: if the fact that the telegraphy is a Polypedatidae but it is not immodest is not correct it is immodest.; sent4 -> int19: there is something such that the fact that it squinches psychotherapist and predates wrecker does not hold.; int19 & sent29 -> int20: the Worcestershire does predate arrowsmith.; sent13 & int20 -> int21: the fact that the telegraphy is a kind of a Polypedatidae but it is not immodest is wrong.; int18 & int21 -> int22: the telegraphy is not non-immodest.;
$hypothesis$ = that the lunching is French and it is a carpenter is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Court does not parry if something is a kind of a plain but it is not anisogametic. sent2: if the telegraphy is a kind of a upholsterer it parries. sent3: the rink is a kind of plain thing that is not anisogametic. sent4: the fact that the Sodom does squinch psychotherapist and does predate wrecker does not hold. sent5: the fact that the speck is immodest and does parry is false. sent6: the telegraphy is not non-isotropic if that the Court is non-isotropic is not incorrect. sent7: if the environmentalist does carpenter then the lunching is isotropic. sent8: if something is both isotropic and immodest then it does not squinch evanescence. sent9: something either is isotropic or is a upholsterer or both if it is not a kind of a parry. sent10: the fact that the environmentalist does not blackmail Worcestershire but it is a Tobagonian is not right if there exists something such that it does not squinch evanescence. sent11: that the environmentalist is a upholsterer but it is not isotropic does not hold. sent12: the lunching carpenters if the telegraphy does parry. sent13: that the telegraphy is a Polypedatidae and is non-immodest is not true if the Worcestershire does predate arrowsmith. sent14: if something does predate arrowsmith or it is not a Polypedatidae or both it is French. sent15: there is something such that it does blackmail Worcestershire and is not a kind of a Polypedatidae. sent16: if something is a Tobagonian it is immodest. sent17: the telegraphy parries. sent18: if that the wrecker blackmails Worcestershire is not wrong it does squinch evanescence. sent19: The Worcestershire does blackmail wrecker. sent20: if the fact that something is a Polypedatidae but it is not immodest is wrong it is immodest. sent21: that the lunching is not a Polypedatidae if the speck is both not non-immodest and isotropic is correct. sent22: the lunching is immodest if it predates arrowsmith and/or it does not squinch evanescence. sent23: if there exists something such that that the fact that it does not blackmail Worcestershire and is a Tobagonian hold does not hold the speck blackmail Worcestershire. sent24: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a upholsterer and it is not isotropic does not hold the speck is isotropic. sent25: that the wrecker is not a French if there is something such that it does blackmail Worcestershire is not false. sent26: the speck is immodest if either it squinches evanescence or it does not carpenter or both. sent27: the speck is Tobagonian if the wrecker does squinch evanescence. sent28: the wrecker does blackmail Worcestershire. sent29: the Worcestershire does predate arrowsmith if there is something such that that it squinches psychotherapist and it predates wrecker is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent28 -> int1: the wrecker squinches evanescence.; int1 & sent27 -> int2: the speck is a kind of a Tobagonian.; sent16 -> int3: the fact that if the speck is Tobagonian the speck is immodest is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the speck is immodest.; sent11 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is a upholsterer and it is not isotropic is false.; int5 & sent24 -> int6: the speck is isotropic.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the speck is a kind of immodest thing that is isotropic.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the lunching is not a Polypedatidae.; int8 -> int9: the lunching either predates arrowsmith or is not a kind of a Polypedatidae or both.; sent14 -> int10: the lunching is not non-French if either it does predate arrowsmith or it is not a Polypedatidae or both.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the lunching Frenches hold.; sent12 & sent17 -> int12: the lunching is a kind of a carpenter.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__