the subtilizing Amsterdam does not occur.
sent1: that the bet does not occur and/or the disbarment does not occur is wrong if the billiardsness does not occur. sent2: the dogmatizing results in that the appropriating ingrate occurs. sent3: that the bet does not occur is prevented by that the billiardsness does not occur. sent4: that the glomming Kach but not the sculpture happens is not right if the appropriating ingrate does not occur. sent5: the dogmatizing but not the rutting happens. sent6: that both the appropriating ingrate and the sculpture happens leads to the non-billiardsness. sent7: if the billiardsness occurs then that not the bet but the appropriating ingrate happens is false. sent8: if that either the betting does not occur or the disbarment does not occur or both is not true the subtilizing Amsterdam does not occur. sent9: the glomming Kach occurs. sent10: that the dogmatizing happens and the disbarment does not occur is not correct if the rutting happens. sent11: that the sculpture occurs is true if both the non-affinedness and the mayoralty happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that both the non-affinedness and the mayoralty occurs does not hold.; sent5 -> int1: the dogmatizing happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the appropriating ingrate happens.;
the subtilizing Amsterdam happens.
$hypothesis$ = the subtilizing Amsterdam does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bet does not occur and/or the disbarment does not occur is wrong if the billiardsness does not occur. sent2: the dogmatizing results in that the appropriating ingrate occurs. sent3: that the bet does not occur is prevented by that the billiardsness does not occur. sent4: that the glomming Kach but not the sculpture happens is not right if the appropriating ingrate does not occur. sent5: the dogmatizing but not the rutting happens. sent6: that both the appropriating ingrate and the sculpture happens leads to the non-billiardsness. sent7: if the billiardsness occurs then that not the bet but the appropriating ingrate happens is false. sent8: if that either the betting does not occur or the disbarment does not occur or both is not true the subtilizing Amsterdam does not occur. sent9: the glomming Kach occurs. sent10: that the dogmatizing happens and the disbarment does not occur is not correct if the rutting happens. sent11: that the sculpture occurs is true if both the non-affinedness and the mayoralty happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that both the non-affinedness and the mayoralty occurs does not hold.; sent5 -> int1: the dogmatizing happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the appropriating ingrate happens.; __UNKNOWN__