the fact that either the rotation or the dating Limosa or both happens is incorrect.
sent1: the alphabetization does not occur. sent2: that the alphabetization does not occur and the adversity does not occur does not hold if the dating manic-depressive does not occur. sent3: if the dating manic-depressive does not occur then that the alphabetization but not the adversity happens does not hold. sent4: the fact that the alphabetization but not the adversity happens is incorrect. sent5: both the dating promoter and the oralness happens. sent6: the dating manic-depressive does not occur if that the startup does not occur hold. sent7: the fact that the name does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: that the startup does not occur is triggered by that the dating promoter occurs and the rotation does not occur. sent9: if the name does not occur the alphabetization does not occur. sent10: if the naming does not occur then the alphabetization does not occur and the adversity does not occur.
sent5 -> int1: the dating promoter occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the rotation does not occur hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dating promoter but not the rotation happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the startup does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the dating manic-depressive does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the alphabetization does not occur and the adversity does not occur is false.; sent10 & sent7 -> int6: the alphabetization does not occur and the adversity does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the rotation happens.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the rotation or the dating Limosa or both happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the alphabetization does not occur. sent2: that the alphabetization does not occur and the adversity does not occur does not hold if the dating manic-depressive does not occur. sent3: if the dating manic-depressive does not occur then that the alphabetization but not the adversity happens does not hold. sent4: the fact that the alphabetization but not the adversity happens is incorrect. sent5: both the dating promoter and the oralness happens. sent6: the dating manic-depressive does not occur if that the startup does not occur hold. sent7: the fact that the name does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: that the startup does not occur is triggered by that the dating promoter occurs and the rotation does not occur. sent9: if the name does not occur the alphabetization does not occur. sent10: if the naming does not occur then the alphabetization does not occur and the adversity does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the dating promoter occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the rotation does not occur hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dating promoter but not the rotation happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the startup does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the dating manic-depressive does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the alphabetization does not occur and the adversity does not occur is false.; sent10 & sent7 -> int6: the alphabetization does not occur and the adversity does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the rotation happens.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__