the unspelling transsexualism and the witch-hunt happens.
sent1: that the achondriticness does not occur is triggered by that the devastation occurs but the prang does not occur. sent2: that the non-hypothalamicness and/or the non-consonantalness occurs is caused by the Romanianness. sent3: that the unspelling clannishness does not occur results in the non-thinness. sent4: that the witch-hunt does not occur yields that the achondriticness and the unspelling transsexualism happens. sent5: if the despairing flatmate does not occur the project happens. sent6: the balminess occurs. sent7: if the recession does not occur then the devastation but not the pranging occurs. sent8: that the marauding does not occur hold. sent9: the thinness happens. sent10: if the recession occurs either the unspelling clannishness does not occur or the whitewash does not occur or both. sent11: the fact that the epicarpalness occurs but the epiduralness does not occur is right if the fact that the despairing nor'-nor'-east does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the unspelling cobblers does not occur if the shooting but not the irreversibleness occurs. sent13: that the liking but not the project happens prevents that the branching happens. sent14: the breakage and the despairing nor'-nor'-east occurs. sent15: the X-raying occurs. sent16: if the fact that the thinning does not occur but the recession happens hold then the elements happens. sent17: not the thinness but the recession occurs if the devastation does not occur. sent18: the Mauritanianness occurs. sent19: the devastation occurs if the recession does not occur. sent20: the thinning does not occur if the whitewash does not occur. sent21: that the cosmopolitan happens is prevented by that the certification does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recession occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the unspelling clannishness does not occur and/or the whitewash does not occur.; int1 & sent3 & sent20 -> int2: the thinness does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the recession does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the devastation occurs and the prang does not occur.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the achondriticness does not occur.;
the elements occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the unspelling transsexualism and the witch-hunt happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the achondriticness does not occur is triggered by that the devastation occurs but the prang does not occur. sent2: that the non-hypothalamicness and/or the non-consonantalness occurs is caused by the Romanianness. sent3: that the unspelling clannishness does not occur results in the non-thinness. sent4: that the witch-hunt does not occur yields that the achondriticness and the unspelling transsexualism happens. sent5: if the despairing flatmate does not occur the project happens. sent6: the balminess occurs. sent7: if the recession does not occur then the devastation but not the pranging occurs. sent8: that the marauding does not occur hold. sent9: the thinness happens. sent10: if the recession occurs either the unspelling clannishness does not occur or the whitewash does not occur or both. sent11: the fact that the epicarpalness occurs but the epiduralness does not occur is right if the fact that the despairing nor'-nor'-east does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the unspelling cobblers does not occur if the shooting but not the irreversibleness occurs. sent13: that the liking but not the project happens prevents that the branching happens. sent14: the breakage and the despairing nor'-nor'-east occurs. sent15: the X-raying occurs. sent16: if the fact that the thinning does not occur but the recession happens hold then the elements happens. sent17: not the thinness but the recession occurs if the devastation does not occur. sent18: the Mauritanianness occurs. sent19: the devastation occurs if the recession does not occur. sent20: the thinning does not occur if the whitewash does not occur. sent21: that the cosmopolitan happens is prevented by that the certification does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recession occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the unspelling clannishness does not occur and/or the whitewash does not occur.; int1 & sent3 & sent20 -> int2: the thinness does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the recession does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the devastation occurs and the prang does not occur.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the achondriticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__