the fructifying occurs.
sent1: the intrauterineness does not occur if that the cheliceralness but not the amazing happens does not hold. sent2: the unloosing transport does not occur if that both the investing punctilio and the unloosing Weismann happens is false. sent3: the intrauterineness does not occur if the cheliceralness does not occur. sent4: if that either the souther does not occur or the intrauterineness happens or both is incorrect the glialness does not occur. sent5: that the investing punctilio and the unloosing Weismann occurs is incorrect if the intrauterineness does not occur. sent6: if the souther does not occur the fructifying does not occur. sent7: if the souther occurs the fact that the cheliceralness occurs but the amazing does not occur is wrong. sent8: both the tabulating belch and the seaward happens. sent9: the unloosing transport and the investing mountaineer occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the souther happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cheliceralness occurs and the amazing does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the intrauterineness does not occur is right.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the investing punctilio happens and the unloosing Weismann occurs is not true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the unloosing transport does not occur.; sent9 -> int5: that the unloosing transport happens hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the souther does not occur.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the glialness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fructifying occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the intrauterineness does not occur if that the cheliceralness but not the amazing happens does not hold. sent2: the unloosing transport does not occur if that both the investing punctilio and the unloosing Weismann happens is false. sent3: the intrauterineness does not occur if the cheliceralness does not occur. sent4: if that either the souther does not occur or the intrauterineness happens or both is incorrect the glialness does not occur. sent5: that the investing punctilio and the unloosing Weismann occurs is incorrect if the intrauterineness does not occur. sent6: if the souther does not occur the fructifying does not occur. sent7: if the souther occurs the fact that the cheliceralness occurs but the amazing does not occur is wrong. sent8: both the tabulating belch and the seaward happens. sent9: the unloosing transport and the investing mountaineer occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the souther happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cheliceralness occurs and the amazing does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the intrauterineness does not occur is right.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the investing punctilio happens and the unloosing Weismann occurs is not true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the unloosing transport does not occur.; sent9 -> int5: that the unloosing transport happens hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the souther does not occur.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__