the smoothening occurs if the leaping registrar happens.
sent1: if the ropiness does not occur the leaping registrar does not occur but the smoothening occurs. sent2: the guggling sulfapyridine occurs and the waiting occurs. sent3: that the self-fulfillment occurs is right. sent4: that the blaxploitation does not occur brings about the non-symmetricalness and/or that the leaping serratus does not occur. sent5: that both the non-promotionalness and the waiting happens does not hold if the leaping registrar does not occur. sent6: either the masterpiece or the discrepancy or both happens if the destructiveness does not occur. sent7: if both the leaping registrar and the wait happens the promotionalness does not occur. sent8: the radioscopy does not occur if both the swooping and the guggling Mott happens. sent9: the non-ropyness is caused by that the sweat occurs and/or the non-ropyness. sent10: that the wait does not occur results in that the permanent and the guggling sulfapyridine happens. sent11: the guggling sulfapyridine occurs. sent12: that the smoothening happens is triggered by the non-promotionalness. sent13: if the arousing occurs the sweating occurs or the ropiness does not occur or both. sent14: the blaxploitation does not occur if the fact that the guggling homily happens but the Oxonianness does not occur does not hold. sent15: the guggling sulfapyridine and the ulnarness happens if the wait does not occur.
sent2 -> int1: the waiting occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leaping registrar occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the leaping registrar and the waiting occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the promotionalness does not occur.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the smoothening occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the permanentness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the smoothening occurs if the leaping registrar happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ropiness does not occur the leaping registrar does not occur but the smoothening occurs. sent2: the guggling sulfapyridine occurs and the waiting occurs. sent3: that the self-fulfillment occurs is right. sent4: that the blaxploitation does not occur brings about the non-symmetricalness and/or that the leaping serratus does not occur. sent5: that both the non-promotionalness and the waiting happens does not hold if the leaping registrar does not occur. sent6: either the masterpiece or the discrepancy or both happens if the destructiveness does not occur. sent7: if both the leaping registrar and the wait happens the promotionalness does not occur. sent8: the radioscopy does not occur if both the swooping and the guggling Mott happens. sent9: the non-ropyness is caused by that the sweat occurs and/or the non-ropyness. sent10: that the wait does not occur results in that the permanent and the guggling sulfapyridine happens. sent11: the guggling sulfapyridine occurs. sent12: that the smoothening happens is triggered by the non-promotionalness. sent13: if the arousing occurs the sweating occurs or the ropiness does not occur or both. sent14: the blaxploitation does not occur if the fact that the guggling homily happens but the Oxonianness does not occur does not hold. sent15: the guggling sulfapyridine and the ulnarness happens if the wait does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the waiting occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leaping registrar occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the leaping registrar and the waiting occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the promotionalness does not occur.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the smoothening occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__