there is something such that if it skips charitableness it is immature and is not a kind of a Nymphicus.
sent1: that there exists something such that if it is unassertive then it does not subtilize Ni-resist and does not ovulate is correct. sent2: the acerola is not untidy and it is spirited if it does appropriate Barthelme. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a woodbine it is not a Megadermatidae. sent4: there is something such that if it is a fun then it is a vac that is not cortico-hypothalamic. sent5: the acerola does not mature but it is a kind of a Nymphicus if it does skip charitableness. sent6: the acerola does not mature if it does skip charitableness. sent7: there exists something such that if it does subtilize carport it is not unemployable. sent8: there is something such that if it is oleophilic it is dull thing that is not a hike. sent9: if something is electrocardiographic then it is both non-cortico-hypothalamic and not a Sculptor. sent10: the fact that the acerola is immature and it is not the Carya if the acerola is a Rosicrucianism is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it appropriates jackhammer it does subtilize Moschus and is not a privation. sent12: there is something such that if it is lumbosacral it does not skip manometer and does not revolve. sent13: if the acerola does skip charitableness then it is a kind of non-mature thing that is not a Nymphicus. sent14: there exists something such that if it reflects it is not macroeconomics and it is not a Megadermatidae.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is electrocardiographic it is not cortico-hypothalamic and is not a Sculptor.
sent9 -> int1: the monotreme is not cortico-hypothalamic and not a Sculptor if it is electrocardiographic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it skips charitableness it is immature and is not a kind of a Nymphicus. ; $context$ = sent1: that there exists something such that if it is unassertive then it does not subtilize Ni-resist and does not ovulate is correct. sent2: the acerola is not untidy and it is spirited if it does appropriate Barthelme. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a woodbine it is not a Megadermatidae. sent4: there is something such that if it is a fun then it is a vac that is not cortico-hypothalamic. sent5: the acerola does not mature but it is a kind of a Nymphicus if it does skip charitableness. sent6: the acerola does not mature if it does skip charitableness. sent7: there exists something such that if it does subtilize carport it is not unemployable. sent8: there is something such that if it is oleophilic it is dull thing that is not a hike. sent9: if something is electrocardiographic then it is both non-cortico-hypothalamic and not a Sculptor. sent10: the fact that the acerola is immature and it is not the Carya if the acerola is a Rosicrucianism is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it appropriates jackhammer it does subtilize Moschus and is not a privation. sent12: there is something such that if it is lumbosacral it does not skip manometer and does not revolve. sent13: if the acerola does skip charitableness then it is a kind of non-mature thing that is not a Nymphicus. sent14: there exists something such that if it reflects it is not macroeconomics and it is not a Megadermatidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__