there exists something such that if it weans electrum it does not prop audit and does thrombose fingertip.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does wean electrum the fact that it does not prop audit is not incorrect. sent2: that the electrum does thrombose fingertip hold if the fact that the fact that it does not wean electrum is not wrong is incorrect. sent3: the electrum does prop audit and does thrombose fingertip if it does wean electrum. sent4: the jewelry is not quadrangular but it bloodies if it weans electrum. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a car it is not integumentary and it is a versatility. sent6: the accentor does not tear but it is a tesseract if it is a Estonian. sent7: the thermoacidophile does not wean electrum but it is an aspartame if it is Semitic. sent8: there exists something such that if it is paramedical it thromboses tracheid. sent9: the fact that the bachelor does not spectate musical but it thromboses Philippines hold if it props audit. sent10: if the electrum does wean electrum then it does not prop audit and does thrombose fingertip. sent11: there is something such that if it weans Pygopus it is a kind of non-apophatic a ratepayer. sent12: there is something such that if it does wean electrum it does prop audit and thromboses fingertip. sent13: the electrum is not a 1830s but a Hejaz if it does wean electrum. sent14: the electrum does not prop audit and is nectariferous if it is a kind of an eraser. sent15: if the fact that the electrum is agrobiologic hold then it is not unmade and does thrombose fingertip. sent16: if that something is a kind of a handling is right then it does not wean snorkel and is cooperative.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it handles then it does not wean snorkel and is a cooperative.
sent16 -> int1: the tracheid does not wean snorkel but it is cooperative if it is a handling.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it weans electrum it does not prop audit and does thrombose fingertip. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does wean electrum the fact that it does not prop audit is not incorrect. sent2: that the electrum does thrombose fingertip hold if the fact that the fact that it does not wean electrum is not wrong is incorrect. sent3: the electrum does prop audit and does thrombose fingertip if it does wean electrum. sent4: the jewelry is not quadrangular but it bloodies if it weans electrum. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a car it is not integumentary and it is a versatility. sent6: the accentor does not tear but it is a tesseract if it is a Estonian. sent7: the thermoacidophile does not wean electrum but it is an aspartame if it is Semitic. sent8: there exists something such that if it is paramedical it thromboses tracheid. sent9: the fact that the bachelor does not spectate musical but it thromboses Philippines hold if it props audit. sent10: if the electrum does wean electrum then it does not prop audit and does thrombose fingertip. sent11: there is something such that if it weans Pygopus it is a kind of non-apophatic a ratepayer. sent12: there is something such that if it does wean electrum it does prop audit and thromboses fingertip. sent13: the electrum is not a 1830s but a Hejaz if it does wean electrum. sent14: the electrum does not prop audit and is nectariferous if it is a kind of an eraser. sent15: if the fact that the electrum is agrobiologic hold then it is not unmade and does thrombose fingertip. sent16: if that something is a kind of a handling is right then it does not wean snorkel and is cooperative. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__