the fact that the sludge is not a pup and is not adaptive is incorrect.
sent1: the sludge is bibliotics. sent2: the sludge is a Paiute and it is bibliotics if the counselor is not a kind of a Paiute. sent3: the counselor is hydrophobic. sent4: the counselor is interplanetary if it is hydrophobic. sent5: if the fact that the drunkard is interplanetary hold that the fact that the in-basket is not a Paiute but a genotype is not false is not right. sent6: there exists something such that it does not snowball Glycyrrhiza and it snowballs decriminalization. sent7: if the counselor is a genotype and it is interplanetary it is not a Paiute. sent8: that the sludge is not a pup is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the counselor is a kind of a genotype if there exists something such that it does not snowball decriminalization is not wrong. sent10: the sludge is not a kind of a pup and is not adaptive if that it is a kind of a Paiute hold. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not snowball Glycyrrhiza and it does snowball decriminalization does not hold the counselor is a genotype. sent12: there is something such that that it does not snowball Glycyrrhiza and it does snowball decriminalization is wrong.
sent12 & sent11 -> int1: the counselor is a genotype.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the counselor is interplanetary.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the counselor is a genotype and it is interplanetary.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the counselor is not a kind of a Paiute.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the sludge is a kind of a Paiute and it is bibliotics.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the sludge is a kind of a Paiute is correct.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the sludge is not a pup and it is not adaptive is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sludge is not a pup and is not adaptive is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the sludge is bibliotics. sent2: the sludge is a Paiute and it is bibliotics if the counselor is not a kind of a Paiute. sent3: the counselor is hydrophobic. sent4: the counselor is interplanetary if it is hydrophobic. sent5: if the fact that the drunkard is interplanetary hold that the fact that the in-basket is not a Paiute but a genotype is not false is not right. sent6: there exists something such that it does not snowball Glycyrrhiza and it snowballs decriminalization. sent7: if the counselor is a genotype and it is interplanetary it is not a Paiute. sent8: that the sludge is not a pup is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the counselor is a kind of a genotype if there exists something such that it does not snowball decriminalization is not wrong. sent10: the sludge is not a kind of a pup and is not adaptive if that it is a kind of a Paiute hold. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not snowball Glycyrrhiza and it does snowball decriminalization does not hold the counselor is a genotype. sent12: there is something such that that it does not snowball Glycyrrhiza and it does snowball decriminalization is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent11 -> int1: the counselor is a genotype.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the counselor is interplanetary.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the counselor is a genotype and it is interplanetary.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the counselor is not a kind of a Paiute.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the sludge is a kind of a Paiute and it is bibliotics.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the sludge is a kind of a Paiute is correct.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__