the fact that the tarragon frets constancy is correct.
sent1: the fact that the beam is philosophic is correct. sent2: the fact that something does fret constancy and is a strider hold if it does not fret Brythonic. sent3: everything is a kind of a stevedore and it interleaves Independence. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is fatal and/or is obligated is not true then that the tarragon is responsible is true. sent5: everything is philosophic and is a kind of a Anaheim. sent6: something is not fatal. sent7: if something is a kind of responsible a Anaheim then it is not participial. sent8: the fact that the beam is fatal and/or it does obligate does not hold if the proposer is not a strider. sent9: that the disposable does not interleave mansion is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is a strider and it is responsible is not true. sent10: if something is philosophic then the proposer is participial thing that frets Brythonic. sent11: the proposer is not a kind of a strider. sent12: if something is not participial then it frets Brythonic. sent13: something does not fret constancy if that it is not a strider but responsible is wrong. sent14: if that something is not philosophic and it does not fret kidnapper does not hold it is philosophic. sent15: everything is not a kind of a granule. sent16: that something is not philosophic and it does not fret kidnapper is not true if it is not a granule. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a Anaheim that the proposer is a strider that is responsible is wrong.
sent8 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that either the beam is fatal or it is obligated or both is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is either fatal or not unobligated or both is false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the tarragon is responsible.; sent5 -> int4: the tarragon is philosophic and is a kind of a Anaheim.; int4 -> int5: the tarragon is a kind of a Anaheim.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the tarragon is responsible and it is a Anaheim.; sent7 -> int7: if the tarragon is responsible and a Anaheim it is not participial.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the tarragon is not participial.;
the tarragon does not fret constancy.
sent13 -> int9: if that the tarragon is not a strider but it is responsible is not correct it does not fret constancy.; sent14 -> int10: if the fact that the beam is not philosophic and does not fret kidnapper is not true then it is philosophic.; sent16 -> int11: if the psephologist is not a kind of a granule then that it is not philosophic and it does not fret kidnapper is incorrect.; sent15 -> int12: the psephologist is not a granule.; int11 & int12 -> int13: that the psephologist is non-philosophic thing that does not fret kidnapper is false.; int13 -> int14: there is nothing such that that it is not philosophic and it does not fret kidnapper hold.; int14 -> int15: the fact that the beam is not philosophic and it does not fret kidnapper is not right.; int10 & int15 -> int16: that the beam is philosophic hold.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is philosophic.; int17 & sent10 -> int18: that the proposer is participial and does fret Brythonic is correct.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that it is participial thing that frets Brythonic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tarragon frets constancy is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the beam is philosophic is correct. sent2: the fact that something does fret constancy and is a strider hold if it does not fret Brythonic. sent3: everything is a kind of a stevedore and it interleaves Independence. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is fatal and/or is obligated is not true then that the tarragon is responsible is true. sent5: everything is philosophic and is a kind of a Anaheim. sent6: something is not fatal. sent7: if something is a kind of responsible a Anaheim then it is not participial. sent8: the fact that the beam is fatal and/or it does obligate does not hold if the proposer is not a strider. sent9: that the disposable does not interleave mansion is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is a strider and it is responsible is not true. sent10: if something is philosophic then the proposer is participial thing that frets Brythonic. sent11: the proposer is not a kind of a strider. sent12: if something is not participial then it frets Brythonic. sent13: something does not fret constancy if that it is not a strider but responsible is wrong. sent14: if that something is not philosophic and it does not fret kidnapper does not hold it is philosophic. sent15: everything is not a kind of a granule. sent16: that something is not philosophic and it does not fret kidnapper is not true if it is not a granule. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a Anaheim that the proposer is a strider that is responsible is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that either the beam is fatal or it is obligated or both is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is either fatal or not unobligated or both is false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the tarragon is responsible.; sent5 -> int4: the tarragon is philosophic and is a kind of a Anaheim.; int4 -> int5: the tarragon is a kind of a Anaheim.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the tarragon is responsible and it is a Anaheim.; sent7 -> int7: if the tarragon is responsible and a Anaheim it is not participial.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the tarragon is not participial.; __UNKNOWN__