the kingdom does imply Epimetheus.
sent1: the strengthener is not a imaret. sent2: if the strengthener does imply strengthener and is not a kind of a clouded then the kingdom is a kind of a fluorescein. sent3: if the kingdom is a kind of a clouded but it does not imply Epimetheus the strengthener is a fluorescein. sent4: the aerator is not a imaret. sent5: if the fact that the aerator is brimless but it does not superscribe Kandy is not right the fact that the kingdom does not superscribe Kandy is not true. sent6: the strengthener does superscribe Kandy if it does not imply strengthener. sent7: if the fact that the kingdom is a fluorescein is not false then it implies Epimetheus. sent8: the fact that the kingdom superscribes Kandy is true. sent9: if something is a imaret that it does imply Epimetheus and it does not superscribe Kandy is not true. sent10: if the aerator is not bryophytic then it is not brimless and it is not a fluorescein. sent11: the fact that the aerator is brimless but it does not superscribe Kandy is false if it is not a kind of a fluorescein. sent12: the aerator is a fluorescein. sent13: something superscribes Kandy if the fact that it does not imply strengthener hold. sent14: the strengthener does imply strengthener. sent15: if the strengthener superscribes Kandy then the aerator is a imaret.
that the kingdom does not imply Epimetheus is correct.
sent9 -> int1: that the kingdom implies Epimetheus but it does not superscribe Kandy is wrong if it is a imaret.;
$hypothesis$ = the kingdom does imply Epimetheus. ; $context$ = sent1: the strengthener is not a imaret. sent2: if the strengthener does imply strengthener and is not a kind of a clouded then the kingdom is a kind of a fluorescein. sent3: if the kingdom is a kind of a clouded but it does not imply Epimetheus the strengthener is a fluorescein. sent4: the aerator is not a imaret. sent5: if the fact that the aerator is brimless but it does not superscribe Kandy is not right the fact that the kingdom does not superscribe Kandy is not true. sent6: the strengthener does superscribe Kandy if it does not imply strengthener. sent7: if the fact that the kingdom is a fluorescein is not false then it implies Epimetheus. sent8: the fact that the kingdom superscribes Kandy is true. sent9: if something is a imaret that it does imply Epimetheus and it does not superscribe Kandy is not true. sent10: if the aerator is not bryophytic then it is not brimless and it is not a fluorescein. sent11: the fact that the aerator is brimless but it does not superscribe Kandy is false if it is not a kind of a fluorescein. sent12: the aerator is a fluorescein. sent13: something superscribes Kandy if the fact that it does not imply strengthener hold. sent14: the strengthener does imply strengthener. sent15: if the strengthener superscribes Kandy then the aerator is a imaret. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__