both the being and the achondriticness happens.
sent1: if the coaching occurs that the barbarizing crapaud occurs and the maltreatment happens is incorrect. sent2: the grouping yarder occurs if the detection does not occur. sent3: the Aristotelian does not occur. sent4: the achondriticness happens but the Aristotelian does not occur. sent5: that the Lens does not occur and the optative does not occur is not correct if that the uncomfortableness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: if the maltreatment happens the barbarizing crapaud does not occur. sent7: that the surgicalness and the laziness occurs does not hold. sent8: that the uncomfortableness occurs but the Lens does not occur prevents that the overturning clash happens. sent9: the Bulgarianness occurs. sent10: if the waggery happens either the coaching does not occur or the Bulgarianness does not occur or both. sent11: the fact that the barbarizing crapaud and the maltreatment happens is not correct. sent12: if the grouping yarder occurs the waggery happens. sent13: if the maltreatment occurs then the uncomfortableness occurs. sent14: the optativeness is prevented by that the betrothal or the Lens or both occurs. sent15: that the betrothal occurs brings about that the optativeness does not occur. sent16: if that the Lens does not occur and the optative does not occur is not right then the betrothal does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the barbarizing crapaud happens but the maltreatment does not occur is incorrect then the uncomfortableness happens. sent18: that the coaching happens is right. sent19: the detection does not occur if that the beef and the non-Sinhalaness happens does not hold. sent20: the fact that the chordalness occurs and the grouping Evansville happens is not right if the fact that the overproduction happens is not false. sent21: both the optativeness and the Bulgarian occurs. sent22: that the beef and the non-Sinhalaness happens is wrong if the onslaught does not occur. sent23: the fact that the barbarizing crapaud happens and the maltreatment does not occur does not hold if that the coach happens is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Lens happens.; assump1 -> int1: the betrothal happens and/or the Lens occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the optative does not occur.; sent21 -> int3: the fact that the optative occurs is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Lens does not occur.; sent23 & sent18 -> int6: the fact that the barbarizing crapaud occurs but the maltreatment does not occur is incorrect.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: that the uncomfortableness occurs is not false.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the uncomfortableness happens and the Lens does not occur.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the overturning clash does not occur.; sent4 -> int10: the achondriticness occurs.;
that the being and the achondriticness occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = both the being and the achondriticness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the coaching occurs that the barbarizing crapaud occurs and the maltreatment happens is incorrect. sent2: the grouping yarder occurs if the detection does not occur. sent3: the Aristotelian does not occur. sent4: the achondriticness happens but the Aristotelian does not occur. sent5: that the Lens does not occur and the optative does not occur is not correct if that the uncomfortableness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: if the maltreatment happens the barbarizing crapaud does not occur. sent7: that the surgicalness and the laziness occurs does not hold. sent8: that the uncomfortableness occurs but the Lens does not occur prevents that the overturning clash happens. sent9: the Bulgarianness occurs. sent10: if the waggery happens either the coaching does not occur or the Bulgarianness does not occur or both. sent11: the fact that the barbarizing crapaud and the maltreatment happens is not correct. sent12: if the grouping yarder occurs the waggery happens. sent13: if the maltreatment occurs then the uncomfortableness occurs. sent14: the optativeness is prevented by that the betrothal or the Lens or both occurs. sent15: that the betrothal occurs brings about that the optativeness does not occur. sent16: if that the Lens does not occur and the optative does not occur is not right then the betrothal does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the barbarizing crapaud happens but the maltreatment does not occur is incorrect then the uncomfortableness happens. sent18: that the coaching happens is right. sent19: the detection does not occur if that the beef and the non-Sinhalaness happens does not hold. sent20: the fact that the chordalness occurs and the grouping Evansville happens is not right if the fact that the overproduction happens is not false. sent21: both the optativeness and the Bulgarian occurs. sent22: that the beef and the non-Sinhalaness happens is wrong if the onslaught does not occur. sent23: the fact that the barbarizing crapaud happens and the maltreatment does not occur does not hold if that the coach happens is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Lens happens.; assump1 -> int1: the betrothal happens and/or the Lens occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the optative does not occur.; sent21 -> int3: the fact that the optative occurs is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Lens does not occur.; sent23 & sent18 -> int6: the fact that the barbarizing crapaud occurs but the maltreatment does not occur is incorrect.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: that the uncomfortableness occurs is not false.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the uncomfortableness happens and the Lens does not occur.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the overturning clash does not occur.; sent4 -> int10: the achondriticness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__