the brotherliness does not occur.
sent1: the ticktock occurs and the cephalicness happens if the banding voider does not occur. sent2: the pastorship does not occur. sent3: if the banding designing occurs the brotherliness happens. sent4: if the denaturing does not occur and the vibrato does not occur then the banding voider does not occur. sent5: that the resorting happens and/or the off-siteness is triggered by that the banding designing does not occur. sent6: the premeditating audit happens. sent7: if the rogation and/or the jumpstarting happens the denaturing does not occur. sent8: the banding voider does not occur if the grandstanding happens. sent9: if that the confession occurs is right the fact that the resorting happens is not incorrect. sent10: the confession happens. sent11: the moralization does not occur and/or the achondroplasticness happens. sent12: the fact that the waryness or the banding allegation or both occurs does not hold if the accelerating BSE happens. sent13: if the ticktock happens the fact that the confession does not occur but the banding designing occurs does not hold. sent14: the fact that the suppling does not occur hold. sent15: the resorting does not occur and/or the off-siteness happens if that the banding designing does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: the rogation occurs and the blow occurs. sent17: if that the catachresticness occurs and/or the premeditating pun does not occur is not true then the vibrato does not occur. sent18: if the skincare occurs then that either the unwariness does not occur or the grandstand happens or both is false. sent19: if the confession happens the fact that either the resort does not occur or the off-siteness occurs or both is not right. sent20: that the premeditating retreatant does not occur brings about that the resonance does not occur and/or that the banding baseline happens. sent21: that either the icebreaker does not occur or the ventilating BSE happens or both is not correct. sent22: the resort occurs and/or the off-siteness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the banding designing does not occur.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: either the resorting does not occur or the off-siteness occurs or both.; sent19 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the resort does not occur or the off-siteness happens or both is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the banding designing occurs.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the brotherliness does not occur.
sent16 -> int5: the rogation happens.; int5 -> int6: the rogation or the jumpstart or both occurs.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: that the denaturing does not occur is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the brotherliness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ticktock occurs and the cephalicness happens if the banding voider does not occur. sent2: the pastorship does not occur. sent3: if the banding designing occurs the brotherliness happens. sent4: if the denaturing does not occur and the vibrato does not occur then the banding voider does not occur. sent5: that the resorting happens and/or the off-siteness is triggered by that the banding designing does not occur. sent6: the premeditating audit happens. sent7: if the rogation and/or the jumpstarting happens the denaturing does not occur. sent8: the banding voider does not occur if the grandstanding happens. sent9: if that the confession occurs is right the fact that the resorting happens is not incorrect. sent10: the confession happens. sent11: the moralization does not occur and/or the achondroplasticness happens. sent12: the fact that the waryness or the banding allegation or both occurs does not hold if the accelerating BSE happens. sent13: if the ticktock happens the fact that the confession does not occur but the banding designing occurs does not hold. sent14: the fact that the suppling does not occur hold. sent15: the resorting does not occur and/or the off-siteness happens if that the banding designing does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: the rogation occurs and the blow occurs. sent17: if that the catachresticness occurs and/or the premeditating pun does not occur is not true then the vibrato does not occur. sent18: if the skincare occurs then that either the unwariness does not occur or the grandstand happens or both is false. sent19: if the confession happens the fact that either the resort does not occur or the off-siteness occurs or both is not right. sent20: that the premeditating retreatant does not occur brings about that the resonance does not occur and/or that the banding baseline happens. sent21: that either the icebreaker does not occur or the ventilating BSE happens or both is not correct. sent22: the resort occurs and/or the off-siteness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the banding designing does not occur.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: either the resorting does not occur or the off-siteness occurs or both.; sent19 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the resort does not occur or the off-siteness happens or both is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the banding designing occurs.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__