not the Nepalese but the indiscernibleness occurs.
sent1: if the bisectionalness happens that the precipitation occurs and the sparkling easiness does not occur is not correct. sent2: the justness does not occur if the fact that the precipitation but not the sparkling easiness occurs does not hold. sent3: the real-timeness does not occur. sent4: the unservileness but not the bridgeableness happens. sent5: that the sparkling Phragmipedium happens is prevented by that the indivisibleness occurs but the volubleness does not occur. sent6: if the justness does not occur both the indivisibleness and the civilian occurs. sent7: if the volubleness happens that the sparkling Phragmipedium does not occur or the embodiment does not occur or both does not hold. sent8: the fact that the orthopticsness happens is true. sent9: if the fact that the enucleation occurs hold the non-scotomatousness and the compacting tichodrome happens. sent10: the enucleation occurs. sent11: if the embodiment does not occur then the enucleation and the sparkling Phragmipedium happens. sent12: if the fact that the civilian happens hold then the indivisibleness and the non-volubleness occurs. sent13: the civilian and the justness occurs. sent14: the crutch does not occur if the eventuating but not the foremanship happens. sent15: the fact that both the non-Nepaleseness and the indiscernibleness happens is not correct if the fact that the enucleation does not occur is not wrong. sent16: if the fact that the non-Nepaleseness and the indiscernibleness occurs does not hold the embodiment does not occur. sent17: if the veil occurs the reprieving does not occur and the faithfulness does not occur. sent18: if the embodiment happens then the enucleation happens. sent19: both the investigating stovepipe and the springboard occurs. sent20: the fact that both the Nepalese and the indiscernibleness occurs is not right. sent21: the fact that the Nepaleseness does not occur is correct. sent22: the enucleation does not occur if the fact that either the sparkling Phragmipedium does not occur or the embodiment does not occur or both is false. sent23: that the reprieve does not occur and the faithfulness does not occur triggers that the bisectionalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that both the non-Nepaleseness and the indiscernibleness happens is incorrect.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the embodiment does not occur.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the enucleation happens and the sparkling Phragmipedium occurs.; int2 -> int3: that the sparkling Phragmipedium occurs hold.; sent13 -> int4: the civilian happens.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: both the indivisibleness and the non-volubleness happens.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the sparkling Phragmipedium does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that both the non-Nepaleseness and the indiscernibleness happens is not right.
$hypothesis$ = not the Nepalese but the indiscernibleness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bisectionalness happens that the precipitation occurs and the sparkling easiness does not occur is not correct. sent2: the justness does not occur if the fact that the precipitation but not the sparkling easiness occurs does not hold. sent3: the real-timeness does not occur. sent4: the unservileness but not the bridgeableness happens. sent5: that the sparkling Phragmipedium happens is prevented by that the indivisibleness occurs but the volubleness does not occur. sent6: if the justness does not occur both the indivisibleness and the civilian occurs. sent7: if the volubleness happens that the sparkling Phragmipedium does not occur or the embodiment does not occur or both does not hold. sent8: the fact that the orthopticsness happens is true. sent9: if the fact that the enucleation occurs hold the non-scotomatousness and the compacting tichodrome happens. sent10: the enucleation occurs. sent11: if the embodiment does not occur then the enucleation and the sparkling Phragmipedium happens. sent12: if the fact that the civilian happens hold then the indivisibleness and the non-volubleness occurs. sent13: the civilian and the justness occurs. sent14: the crutch does not occur if the eventuating but not the foremanship happens. sent15: the fact that both the non-Nepaleseness and the indiscernibleness happens is not correct if the fact that the enucleation does not occur is not wrong. sent16: if the fact that the non-Nepaleseness and the indiscernibleness occurs does not hold the embodiment does not occur. sent17: if the veil occurs the reprieving does not occur and the faithfulness does not occur. sent18: if the embodiment happens then the enucleation happens. sent19: both the investigating stovepipe and the springboard occurs. sent20: the fact that both the Nepalese and the indiscernibleness occurs is not right. sent21: the fact that the Nepaleseness does not occur is correct. sent22: the enucleation does not occur if the fact that either the sparkling Phragmipedium does not occur or the embodiment does not occur or both is false. sent23: that the reprieve does not occur and the faithfulness does not occur triggers that the bisectionalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that both the non-Nepaleseness and the indiscernibleness happens is incorrect.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the embodiment does not occur.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the enucleation happens and the sparkling Phragmipedium occurs.; int2 -> int3: that the sparkling Phragmipedium occurs hold.; sent13 -> int4: the civilian happens.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: both the indivisibleness and the non-volubleness happens.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the sparkling Phragmipedium does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__