there exists something such that if it is not an airbus then that it is not a ethnographer and is Rousseauan is not true.
sent1: the fact that the bayou does not unmake alum and does interrelate parent is not true if the fact that it is not independent hold. sent2: if something is a kind of an airbus then the fact that it is not a ethnographer but Rousseauan is not true. sent3: if something does not defibrillate printmaker then the fact that it is not a trouble and it is neotenic does not hold. sent4: if the parent is not an airbus then that it is a kind of a ethnographer and it is Rousseauan does not hold. sent5: that something is a ethnographer and Rousseauan does not hold if it is not an airbus. sent6: there is something such that if it is not an airbus the fact that it is a ethnographer and it is Rousseauan is wrong. sent7: something that is not an airbus is both not a ethnographer and Rousseauan. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an airbus then it is not a ethnographer and is Rousseauan. sent9: the fact that that the parent is both not a ethnographer and Rousseauan does not hold is not false if it is an airbus. sent10: the parent is not a ethnographer and is not non-Rousseauan if the fact that it is not an airbus is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it is an airbus that it is not a ethnographer and it is not non-Rousseauan is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not an airbus then that it is not a ethnographer and is Rousseauan is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bayou does not unmake alum and does interrelate parent is not true if the fact that it is not independent hold. sent2: if something is a kind of an airbus then the fact that it is not a ethnographer but Rousseauan is not true. sent3: if something does not defibrillate printmaker then the fact that it is not a trouble and it is neotenic does not hold. sent4: if the parent is not an airbus then that it is a kind of a ethnographer and it is Rousseauan does not hold. sent5: that something is a ethnographer and Rousseauan does not hold if it is not an airbus. sent6: there is something such that if it is not an airbus the fact that it is a ethnographer and it is Rousseauan is wrong. sent7: something that is not an airbus is both not a ethnographer and Rousseauan. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an airbus then it is not a ethnographer and is Rousseauan. sent9: the fact that that the parent is both not a ethnographer and Rousseauan does not hold is not false if it is an airbus. sent10: the parent is not a ethnographer and is not non-Rousseauan if the fact that it is not an airbus is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it is an airbus that it is not a ethnographer and it is not non-Rousseauan is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__