that the hoister embowers stabilization if the whippet angers does not hold.
sent1: if the mildness is not tensional then that it is unreportable and does not embower stabilization does not hold. sent2: the mildness ushers coelenterate. sent3: there exists something such that it is unreportable and it is not tensional. sent4: if the mildness is not a alterability the fact that it is unreportable and not tensional is false. sent5: the whippet is a kind of a dormer. sent6: the fact that the mildness is both an anger and non-choragic does not hold if it is not a alterability. sent7: if the mildness is not a alterability then the fact that it is unreportable and it is tensional is not true. sent8: the Federalist is not a zirconium. sent9: something does exhilarate blatancy and does not embower stabilization if it is a dormer. sent10: the hoister does not embower stabilization but it is unreportable. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it embowers stabilization and it is not a alterability is wrong. sent12: the mildness is not a alterability. sent13: the fact that the mildness is both unreportable and tensional is not right. sent14: if the whippet is not choragic but an anger the hoister embowers stabilization. sent15: the fact that the hoister does embower stabilization but it is not choragic does not hold if it is not an anger. sent16: the whippet is non-choragic if there exists something such that the fact that it is unreportable and is not tensional does not hold. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a alterability and is not unreportable does not hold then the mildness is non-tensional. sent18: the fact that the hoister is unreportable but it is not a kind of a tannery is wrong if it does not simplify. sent19: the mildness is a kind of an anger if the whippet is a alterability. sent20: the whippet is not choragic if there exists something such that it is not non-tensional. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is unreportable and it is tensional is not true.
sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the fact that the mildness is unreportable but it is not tensional is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not reportable and not tensional is wrong.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the whippet is non-choragic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the whippet is a kind of an anger is not false.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the whippet is a kind of non-choragic thing that is an anger.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the hoister does embower stabilization.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the caff is not a alterability.
sent9 -> int6: the whippet does exhilarate blatancy but it does not embower stabilization if it is a kind of a dormer.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the whippet exhilarates blatancy but it does not embower stabilization.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it does exhilarate blatancy and it does not embower stabilization.;
$hypothesis$ = that the hoister embowers stabilization if the whippet angers does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mildness is not tensional then that it is unreportable and does not embower stabilization does not hold. sent2: the mildness ushers coelenterate. sent3: there exists something such that it is unreportable and it is not tensional. sent4: if the mildness is not a alterability the fact that it is unreportable and not tensional is false. sent5: the whippet is a kind of a dormer. sent6: the fact that the mildness is both an anger and non-choragic does not hold if it is not a alterability. sent7: if the mildness is not a alterability then the fact that it is unreportable and it is tensional is not true. sent8: the Federalist is not a zirconium. sent9: something does exhilarate blatancy and does not embower stabilization if it is a dormer. sent10: the hoister does not embower stabilization but it is unreportable. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it embowers stabilization and it is not a alterability is wrong. sent12: the mildness is not a alterability. sent13: the fact that the mildness is both unreportable and tensional is not right. sent14: if the whippet is not choragic but an anger the hoister embowers stabilization. sent15: the fact that the hoister does embower stabilization but it is not choragic does not hold if it is not an anger. sent16: the whippet is non-choragic if there exists something such that the fact that it is unreportable and is not tensional does not hold. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a alterability and is not unreportable does not hold then the mildness is non-tensional. sent18: the fact that the hoister is unreportable but it is not a kind of a tannery is wrong if it does not simplify. sent19: the mildness is a kind of an anger if the whippet is a alterability. sent20: the whippet is not choragic if there exists something such that it is not non-tensional. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is unreportable and it is tensional is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the fact that the mildness is unreportable but it is not tensional is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not reportable and not tensional is wrong.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the whippet is non-choragic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the whippet is a kind of an anger is not false.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the whippet is a kind of non-choragic thing that is an anger.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the hoister does embower stabilization.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__