the decoction is a perceptiveness and it is dural.
sent1: that the Damascene is not dural is correct if that either it is not a histoincompatibility or it does enliven survey or both is not correct. sent2: the fact that that the pendant is not genetic and enlivens Messidor is correct is incorrect. sent3: something that is not a kumquat is not preventable and does dogmatize. sent4: if the fact that the Damascene is a kind of a histoincompatibility or it does not enliven survey or both does not hold then it is not dural. sent5: if the fact that the pendant is not genetic but it enlivens Messidor is incorrect then the scurf is not a kind of an onyx. sent6: the decoction is not a histoincompatibility if the Damascene is not dural. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a histoincompatibility and/or it does not enliven survey does not hold then it is non-dural. sent8: if the EPROM is not a kumquat then it does dogmatize. sent9: the pendant is not an onyx. sent10: the neglecter is not unbridgeable and enlivens Messidor. sent11: something does dogmatize if it is not a kumquat. sent12: if the Damascene is not dural that the decoction is both a perceptiveness and dural is not true. sent13: the EPROM does dogmatize. sent14: if the fact that something is not a histoincompatibility and/or enlivens survey does not hold it is not dural. sent15: something is not a histoincompatibility but dural if it is not a perceptiveness. sent16: if the fact that something either is a histoincompatibility or does not enliven survey or both is incorrect it is non-dural. sent17: that the EPROM does not dogmatize and/or it does not enliven Messidor is not true. sent18: something is a kind of a perceptiveness if it is a kumquat. sent19: the fact that the Damascene is not a kind of a histoincompatibility and/or it does not enliven survey does not hold if the EPROM is not preventable. sent20: if the pendant is genetic then that the scurf is not a kind of an onyx hold. sent21: the EPROM is not a kumquat if the scurf is not an onyx. sent22: the fact that the pendant is genetic and it enlivens Messidor is incorrect. sent23: the decoction is not an onyx.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the scurf is not a kind of an onyx.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the EPROM is not a kumquat.; sent3 -> int3: the EPROM is not preventable and does dogmatize if it is not a kumquat.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the EPROM is a kind of unpreventable thing that dogmatizes.; int4 -> int5: the EPROM is not preventable.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the fact that the Damascene either is not a histoincompatibility or does not enliven survey or both is not right.; sent7 -> int7: if the fact that the Damascene is not a histoincompatibility and/or does not enliven survey is incorrect then it is not dural.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Damascene is not dural.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the decoction is a perceptiveness and dural is not incorrect.
sent18 -> int9: if the decoction is a kind of a kumquat then it is a perceptiveness.;
$hypothesis$ = the decoction is a perceptiveness and it is dural. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Damascene is not dural is correct if that either it is not a histoincompatibility or it does enliven survey or both is not correct. sent2: the fact that that the pendant is not genetic and enlivens Messidor is correct is incorrect. sent3: something that is not a kumquat is not preventable and does dogmatize. sent4: if the fact that the Damascene is a kind of a histoincompatibility or it does not enliven survey or both does not hold then it is not dural. sent5: if the fact that the pendant is not genetic but it enlivens Messidor is incorrect then the scurf is not a kind of an onyx. sent6: the decoction is not a histoincompatibility if the Damascene is not dural. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a histoincompatibility and/or it does not enliven survey does not hold then it is non-dural. sent8: if the EPROM is not a kumquat then it does dogmatize. sent9: the pendant is not an onyx. sent10: the neglecter is not unbridgeable and enlivens Messidor. sent11: something does dogmatize if it is not a kumquat. sent12: if the Damascene is not dural that the decoction is both a perceptiveness and dural is not true. sent13: the EPROM does dogmatize. sent14: if the fact that something is not a histoincompatibility and/or enlivens survey does not hold it is not dural. sent15: something is not a histoincompatibility but dural if it is not a perceptiveness. sent16: if the fact that something either is a histoincompatibility or does not enliven survey or both is incorrect it is non-dural. sent17: that the EPROM does not dogmatize and/or it does not enliven Messidor is not true. sent18: something is a kind of a perceptiveness if it is a kumquat. sent19: the fact that the Damascene is not a kind of a histoincompatibility and/or it does not enliven survey does not hold if the EPROM is not preventable. sent20: if the pendant is genetic then that the scurf is not a kind of an onyx hold. sent21: the EPROM is not a kumquat if the scurf is not an onyx. sent22: the fact that the pendant is genetic and it enlivens Messidor is incorrect. sent23: the decoction is not an onyx. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the scurf is not a kind of an onyx.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the EPROM is not a kumquat.; sent3 -> int3: the EPROM is not preventable and does dogmatize if it is not a kumquat.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the EPROM is a kind of unpreventable thing that dogmatizes.; int4 -> int5: the EPROM is not preventable.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the fact that the Damascene either is not a histoincompatibility or does not enliven survey or both is not right.; sent7 -> int7: if the fact that the Damascene is not a histoincompatibility and/or does not enliven survey is incorrect then it is not dural.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Damascene is not dural.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__