the fact that the peekaboo does not occur but the lowbornness occurs is not correct.
sent1: if the monetariness does not occur the noness and the recidivism occurs. sent2: if either the four-hitter does not occur or the discarding does not occur or both then the no does not occur. sent3: the no does not occur if the discarding does not occur. sent4: the ravaging happens. sent5: the ravaging does not occur and the unidimensionalness happens if that the discarding does not occur hold. sent6: if the fact that the doctrinalness occurs and the Dorian happens is wrong then the fact that the monetariness happens does not hold. sent7: if the populating dehydration does not occur not the peekaboo but the lowbornness occurs. sent8: that the excitableness does not occur triggers that the populating dehydration does not occur. sent9: if the unidimensionalness does not occur then the four-hitter does not occur and/or the discarding does not occur. sent10: if the refrigeration does not occur then that both the doctrinalness and the Dorian happens does not hold. sent11: if the populating dehydration does not occur then the peekaboo does not occur. sent12: the refrigeration does not occur. sent13: the excitableness but not the populating anxiety occurs if the ravaging does not occur. sent14: if the excitableness and the ravaging happens then the unidimensionalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the excitableness occurs is correct.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: both the excitableness and the ravaging happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the unidimensionalness does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the four-hitter does not occur or the discarding does not occur or both is not false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the no does not occur.; sent10 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the doctrinalness and the Dorian occurs is not right.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the monetariness does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: both the noness and the recidivism happens.; int7 -> int8: the no happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the excitableness does not occur.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the fact that the populating dehydration does not occur is correct.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the populating anxiety does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the peekaboo does not occur but the lowbornness occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the monetariness does not occur the noness and the recidivism occurs. sent2: if either the four-hitter does not occur or the discarding does not occur or both then the no does not occur. sent3: the no does not occur if the discarding does not occur. sent4: the ravaging happens. sent5: the ravaging does not occur and the unidimensionalness happens if that the discarding does not occur hold. sent6: if the fact that the doctrinalness occurs and the Dorian happens is wrong then the fact that the monetariness happens does not hold. sent7: if the populating dehydration does not occur not the peekaboo but the lowbornness occurs. sent8: that the excitableness does not occur triggers that the populating dehydration does not occur. sent9: if the unidimensionalness does not occur then the four-hitter does not occur and/or the discarding does not occur. sent10: if the refrigeration does not occur then that both the doctrinalness and the Dorian happens does not hold. sent11: if the populating dehydration does not occur then the peekaboo does not occur. sent12: the refrigeration does not occur. sent13: the excitableness but not the populating anxiety occurs if the ravaging does not occur. sent14: if the excitableness and the ravaging happens then the unidimensionalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the excitableness occurs is correct.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: both the excitableness and the ravaging happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the unidimensionalness does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the four-hitter does not occur or the discarding does not occur or both is not false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the no does not occur.; sent10 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the doctrinalness and the Dorian occurs is not right.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the monetariness does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: both the noness and the recidivism happens.; int7 -> int8: the no happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the excitableness does not occur.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the fact that the populating dehydration does not occur is correct.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__