that something is a kind of a adsorbate and does perfume spyware is not right.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is not a midnight and does not perfume spyware is wrong the boarhound is a midnight. sent2: the Chinook is both impressionistic and a Platystemon if the jersey does not perfume bastardization. sent3: that something is not a kind of a midnight and it does not perfume spyware does not hold if it does not assimilate. sent4: the crossover perfumes spyware and it assimilates. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a adsorbate and it is not incurious is false if it is tangible. sent6: that the cobbler is a kind of a throb but it does not brad kopek is false if that the Chinook is impressionistic hold. sent7: if something is a midnight that is not incurious then the crossover is a adsorbate. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the cobbler is not a adsorbate and is not incurious hold is not correct then the crossover does not assimilate. sent9: something is tangible if the fact that it is a kind of a throb and does not brad kopek is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a midnight and is curious.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the crossover does perfume spyware is not wrong.; sent10 & sent7 -> int2: the crossover is a adsorbate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crossover is a adsorbate and it does perfume spyware.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the boarhound is a midnight.
sent3 -> int4: that if the crossover does not assimilate then the fact that the crossover is not a midnight and it does not perfume spyware is wrong is correct.; sent5 -> int5: if the cobbler is tangible the fact that it is not a adsorbate and it is not incurious is not right.; sent9 -> int6: the cobbler is tangible if the fact that it is a throb and does not brad kopek is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is a kind of a adsorbate and does perfume spyware is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is not a midnight and does not perfume spyware is wrong the boarhound is a midnight. sent2: the Chinook is both impressionistic and a Platystemon if the jersey does not perfume bastardization. sent3: that something is not a kind of a midnight and it does not perfume spyware does not hold if it does not assimilate. sent4: the crossover perfumes spyware and it assimilates. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a adsorbate and it is not incurious is false if it is tangible. sent6: that the cobbler is a kind of a throb but it does not brad kopek is false if that the Chinook is impressionistic hold. sent7: if something is a midnight that is not incurious then the crossover is a adsorbate. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the cobbler is not a adsorbate and is not incurious hold is not correct then the crossover does not assimilate. sent9: something is tangible if the fact that it is a kind of a throb and does not brad kopek is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a midnight and is curious. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the crossover does perfume spyware is not wrong.; sent10 & sent7 -> int2: the crossover is a adsorbate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crossover is a adsorbate and it does perfume spyware.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__