the justiciary does bask gamecock.
sent1: if the fact that the magnum is a prickliness but it is not shelflike is incorrect the fact that it unites is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is both a prickliness and not shelflike is false if it is pleasant. sent3: the VCR is not dicotyledonous if it is sectorial. sent4: the VCR impairs locking if that the magnum is not noncrystalline but it does bask belching is wrong. sent5: something that impairs locking does not bask gamecock and is sternutatory. sent6: if something is baric but it is not a broil it does impair locking. sent7: the fact that the magnum is not unpleasant hold if the VCR is unpleasant. sent8: if something does bask geneticism and/or is not legal then it bask geneticism. sent9: that the fact that the neoliberal is a prosecutor and it is nebular hold is false. sent10: the fact that the VCR is not a willowware but it does deplore tilling is false. sent11: the magnum is not a broil and basks belching. sent12: if something is legal then it basks gamecock. sent13: if that the VCR is a oxheart hold then the magnum is pleasant. sent14: the VCR is a kind of a reply and it is sectorial. sent15: the VCR is pleasant and/or is a oxheart if it is not dicotyledonous. sent16: that the magnum is not noncrystalline but it does bask belching does not hold if it is not sternutatory. sent17: the justiciary is not baric and basks geneticism if the witch does broil. sent18: the RN is noncrystalline. sent19: if the VCR does impair locking then the witch is a kind of a broil. sent20: something is legal if it is not baric and basks geneticism. sent21: the fact that the magnum is not sternutatory is not incorrect.
sent16 & sent21 -> int1: that the magnum is not noncrystalline but it does bask belching is incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the VCR impairs locking.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the witch does broil.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the justiciary is not baric and basks geneticism.; sent20 -> int5: if the justiciary is not baric and basks geneticism then it is legal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the justiciary is legal.; sent12 -> int7: if the justiciary is legal then it basks gamecock.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the justiciary does not bask gamecock is not incorrect.
sent5 -> int8: if the justiciary does impair locking it does not bask gamecock and is sternutatory.; sent6 -> int9: if the justiciary is baric but it is not a kind of a broil it does impair locking.; sent8 -> int10: if the justiciary does bask geneticism or it is not legal or both then that it does bask geneticism is correct.; sent2 -> int11: the fact that the magnum is a prickliness and not shelflike does not hold if it is pleasant.; sent14 -> int12: the VCR is sectorial.; sent3 & int12 -> int13: the VCR is not dicotyledonous.; sent15 & int13 -> int14: the VCR is pleasant and/or it is a oxheart.; int14 & sent7 & sent13 -> int15: the magnum is pleasant.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the magnum is a kind of a prickliness but it is not shelflike does not hold.; sent1 & int16 -> int17: the magnum does unite.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it unites.;
$hypothesis$ = the justiciary does bask gamecock. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the magnum is a prickliness but it is not shelflike is incorrect the fact that it unites is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is both a prickliness and not shelflike is false if it is pleasant. sent3: the VCR is not dicotyledonous if it is sectorial. sent4: the VCR impairs locking if that the magnum is not noncrystalline but it does bask belching is wrong. sent5: something that impairs locking does not bask gamecock and is sternutatory. sent6: if something is baric but it is not a broil it does impair locking. sent7: the fact that the magnum is not unpleasant hold if the VCR is unpleasant. sent8: if something does bask geneticism and/or is not legal then it bask geneticism. sent9: that the fact that the neoliberal is a prosecutor and it is nebular hold is false. sent10: the fact that the VCR is not a willowware but it does deplore tilling is false. sent11: the magnum is not a broil and basks belching. sent12: if something is legal then it basks gamecock. sent13: if that the VCR is a oxheart hold then the magnum is pleasant. sent14: the VCR is a kind of a reply and it is sectorial. sent15: the VCR is pleasant and/or is a oxheart if it is not dicotyledonous. sent16: that the magnum is not noncrystalline but it does bask belching does not hold if it is not sternutatory. sent17: the justiciary is not baric and basks geneticism if the witch does broil. sent18: the RN is noncrystalline. sent19: if the VCR does impair locking then the witch is a kind of a broil. sent20: something is legal if it is not baric and basks geneticism. sent21: the fact that the magnum is not sternutatory is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent21 -> int1: that the magnum is not noncrystalline but it does bask belching is incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the VCR impairs locking.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the witch does broil.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the justiciary is not baric and basks geneticism.; sent20 -> int5: if the justiciary is not baric and basks geneticism then it is legal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the justiciary is legal.; sent12 -> int7: if the justiciary is legal then it basks gamecock.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__