that if the weather is not dysphemistic that the nailhead does not need but it does sputter Langtry is wrong is incorrect.
sent1: that the weather is a capulin and it is a kind of a Jonson is not correct. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a Jonson then the nailhead sputters Langtry and is a kind of a capulin. sent3: if the weather is not dysphemistic then the fact that the nailhead is a kind of a need that does sputter Langtry is false. sent4: if that the weather is not a kind of a capulin hold the fact that the nailhead is a Jonson and sputters Langtry is not right. sent5: the nailhead is not a Jonson but it does sputter Langtry. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a capulin then the weather is both dysphemistic and a Jonson. sent7: the fact that the weather does not sputter Langtry is correct. sent8: that the nailhead is not dysphemistic but it is a kind of a need is incorrect. sent9: that the weather is a kind of a crottle and it is a Villahermosa is incorrect. sent10: if the weather sputters Langtry and is a Jonson then it is a kind of a need. sent11: the nailhead does not need and sputters Langtry if the weather is not dysphemistic. sent12: the nailhead does sputter Langtry. sent13: if the nailhead is a Jonson and is dysphemistic it is a need. sent14: the bobcat needs. sent15: the nailhead is a capulin if it needs and it does sputter Langtry. sent16: the weather is a Jonson if there exists something such that it is a kind of a capulin. sent17: that the nailhead is not a need but it sputters Langtry is false if the weather is dysphemistic. sent18: something needs. sent19: if the weather is not a kind of a need but it is dysphemistic then it is a capulin. sent20: the weather is not a need but it is a capulin if the nailhead is not dysphemistic. sent21: if the nailhead is not a need and does sputter Langtry it is a kind of a capulin.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nailhead is not a need and sputters Langtry.; sent21 & assump2 -> int1: the nailhead is a kind of a capulin.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a capulin.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the weather is dysphemistic and it is a Jonson.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the weather is dysphemistic is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weather is not dysphemistic.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the nailhead does not need and does sputter Langtry is not true.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the weather is not dysphemistic that the nailhead does not need but it does sputter Langtry is wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the weather is a capulin and it is a kind of a Jonson is not correct. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a Jonson then the nailhead sputters Langtry and is a kind of a capulin. sent3: if the weather is not dysphemistic then the fact that the nailhead is a kind of a need that does sputter Langtry is false. sent4: if that the weather is not a kind of a capulin hold the fact that the nailhead is a Jonson and sputters Langtry is not right. sent5: the nailhead is not a Jonson but it does sputter Langtry. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a capulin then the weather is both dysphemistic and a Jonson. sent7: the fact that the weather does not sputter Langtry is correct. sent8: that the nailhead is not dysphemistic but it is a kind of a need is incorrect. sent9: that the weather is a kind of a crottle and it is a Villahermosa is incorrect. sent10: if the weather sputters Langtry and is a Jonson then it is a kind of a need. sent11: the nailhead does not need and sputters Langtry if the weather is not dysphemistic. sent12: the nailhead does sputter Langtry. sent13: if the nailhead is a Jonson and is dysphemistic it is a need. sent14: the bobcat needs. sent15: the nailhead is a capulin if it needs and it does sputter Langtry. sent16: the weather is a Jonson if there exists something such that it is a kind of a capulin. sent17: that the nailhead is not a need but it sputters Langtry is false if the weather is dysphemistic. sent18: something needs. sent19: if the weather is not a kind of a need but it is dysphemistic then it is a capulin. sent20: the weather is not a need but it is a capulin if the nailhead is not dysphemistic. sent21: if the nailhead is not a need and does sputter Langtry it is a kind of a capulin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nailhead is not a need and sputters Langtry.; sent21 & assump2 -> int1: the nailhead is a kind of a capulin.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a capulin.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the weather is dysphemistic and it is a Jonson.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the weather is dysphemistic is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weather is not dysphemistic.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the nailhead does not need and does sputter Langtry is not true.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__