there is something such that if it is not a polarity then the fact that it is a narcotic but not edible is wrong.
sent1: that the whip-scorpion is narcotic thing that is edible does not hold if it is not a polarity. sent2: there is something such that if it is a polarity that it is both a narcotic and inedible does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a polarity it is a kind of narcotic thing that is inedible. sent4: that the whip-scorpion is a narcotic but it is not edible is not true if the fact that it is not a polarity hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a Wilmut then the fact that it is righteous and perambulates is not correct.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a polarity then the fact that it is a narcotic but not edible is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the whip-scorpion is narcotic thing that is edible does not hold if it is not a polarity. sent2: there is something such that if it is a polarity that it is both a narcotic and inedible does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a polarity it is a kind of narcotic thing that is inedible. sent4: that the whip-scorpion is a narcotic but it is not edible is not true if the fact that it is not a polarity hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a Wilmut then the fact that it is righteous and perambulates is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__