the amylase is a kind of non-attractive thing that is not a phlogopite.
sent1: the fact that the amylase is attractive and not a phlogopite is wrong. sent2: if the gantlet scoffs Eigen then the ganger is not a lanugo but it does ensky nothingness. sent3: the amylase does not ensky mutagen if it is a Chemakuan. sent4: if the fact that the amylase does ensky nothingness and/or it is capsular is not false it is not a lanugo. sent5: the fact that the amylase is attractive thing that is not a kind of a phlogopite does not hold if the fact that it is not capsular is not false. sent6: if the amylase enskies nothingness it is not a lanugo. sent7: the fact that the Bastille does scoff ten-spot is right if the fact that it is attractive is true. sent8: the mutagen scoffs Corday and does not chap if there exists something such that it is not a synchrocyclotron. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a synchrocyclotron. sent10: the amylase is epidemiologic. sent11: if that the hill is not epidemiologic is not false then that the entertainer is capsular and it is a phlogopite is not true. sent12: the fact that the gantlet does scoff Eigen is true if the mutagen scoffs Corday but it does not chap. sent13: if the amylase is not capsular the fact that it is not attractive and not a phlogopite does not hold. sent14: if something that is not a lanugo enskies nothingness then the amylase is not attractive. sent15: the fact that something is not a phlogopite and does ensky nothingness does not hold if it is capsular. sent16: the hill is attractive or it is capsular or both. sent17: if there is something such that it is attractive and/or it is capsular the entertainer is capsular. sent18: the amylase is a lanugo if it is not non-epidemiologic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amylase is capsular.; assump1 -> int1: the amylase enskies nothingness and/or it is capsular.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the amylase is not a lanugo is not wrong.; sent18 & sent10 -> int3: the amylase is a kind of a lanugo.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the amylase is not capsular.; int5 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the amylase is not attractive and is not a phlogopite.
sent9 & sent8 -> int6: the mutagen scoffs Corday but it is not a kind of a chap.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the gantlet does scoff Eigen.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the ganger is not a lanugo but it enskies nothingness.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a kind of a lanugo and enskies nothingness.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: the amylase is not attractive.;
$hypothesis$ = the amylase is a kind of non-attractive thing that is not a phlogopite. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the amylase is attractive and not a phlogopite is wrong. sent2: if the gantlet scoffs Eigen then the ganger is not a lanugo but it does ensky nothingness. sent3: the amylase does not ensky mutagen if it is a Chemakuan. sent4: if the fact that the amylase does ensky nothingness and/or it is capsular is not false it is not a lanugo. sent5: the fact that the amylase is attractive thing that is not a kind of a phlogopite does not hold if the fact that it is not capsular is not false. sent6: if the amylase enskies nothingness it is not a lanugo. sent7: the fact that the Bastille does scoff ten-spot is right if the fact that it is attractive is true. sent8: the mutagen scoffs Corday and does not chap if there exists something such that it is not a synchrocyclotron. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a synchrocyclotron. sent10: the amylase is epidemiologic. sent11: if that the hill is not epidemiologic is not false then that the entertainer is capsular and it is a phlogopite is not true. sent12: the fact that the gantlet does scoff Eigen is true if the mutagen scoffs Corday but it does not chap. sent13: if the amylase is not capsular the fact that it is not attractive and not a phlogopite does not hold. sent14: if something that is not a lanugo enskies nothingness then the amylase is not attractive. sent15: the fact that something is not a phlogopite and does ensky nothingness does not hold if it is capsular. sent16: the hill is attractive or it is capsular or both. sent17: if there is something such that it is attractive and/or it is capsular the entertainer is capsular. sent18: the amylase is a lanugo if it is not non-epidemiologic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amylase is capsular.; assump1 -> int1: the amylase enskies nothingness and/or it is capsular.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the amylase is not a lanugo is not wrong.; sent18 & sent10 -> int3: the amylase is a kind of a lanugo.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the amylase is not capsular.; int5 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__