the fact that there is something such that it does enfranchise monetization and is a rich is false.
sent1: there is something such that it is a kind of a cocarboxylase. sent2: if the perineum is not a Athena and it does not enfranchise monetization the nasal is a coonskin. sent3: if the sapphire does not enfranchise monetization and is not a kind of a Athena the perineum is a coonskin. sent4: the foible is not a kind of a sahib and it is not a alphabetizer. sent5: the burnous is not a Changtzu and it does not lean corozo. sent6: if the Togolese is not a Changtzu and not a coonskin the sapphire is a Athena. sent7: if that the perineum is a Athena but it is not a coup does not hold the nasal is not a Changtzu. sent8: if the fact that the nasal is a kind of a Athena that is not a kind of a alphabetizer is false then the burnous is not a cocarboxylase. sent9: the perineum is a Changtzu that is a kind of a coup. sent10: the nasal is a rich if the perineum is a kind of a alphabetizer and does not enfranchise monetization. sent11: if the sapphire is a kind of a Athena the fact that the nasal is a Athena but it is not a alphabetizer is false. sent12: the fact that the fact that the nasal is a alphabetizer that is not a Changtzu is not false does not hold if the Togolese is a kind of a alphabetizer. sent13: the Togolese is not rich. sent14: the Togolese is both not a Changtzu and not a coonskin. sent15: if the fact that the perineum is a coonskin and is not rich is wrong that the Togolese is not a Athena is correct. sent16: the sapphire is not a coup. sent17: if the burnous is not a kind of a cocarboxylase the perineum enfranchises monetization and it is a kind of a coup. sent18: the nasal is a kind of a Athena and is a coonskin. sent19: the burnous is a kind of a gallinacean and is a coonskin. sent20: the Togolese is not a kind of a Changtzu and it is not a kind of a rich. sent21: the perineum is rich. sent22: the Togolese is not a coup if the perineum is a coonskin. sent23: the fact that the perineum is a alphabetizer that is a coup is incorrect if the nasal is a alphabetizer. sent24: if the nasal is not a kind of a Athena then the sapphire is a alphabetizer. sent25: the chopper is not a coup and it is not a piglet.
sent6 & sent14 -> int1: the sapphire is a Athena.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the nasal is a kind of a Athena but it is not a kind of a alphabetizer is incorrect.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the burnous is not a kind of a cocarboxylase.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the perineum does enfranchise monetization and it is a coup.; int4 -> int5: the perineum does enfranchise monetization.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the perineum does enfranchise monetization and it is a rich.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it does enfranchise monetization and is a rich is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is a kind of a cocarboxylase. sent2: if the perineum is not a Athena and it does not enfranchise monetization the nasal is a coonskin. sent3: if the sapphire does not enfranchise monetization and is not a kind of a Athena the perineum is a coonskin. sent4: the foible is not a kind of a sahib and it is not a alphabetizer. sent5: the burnous is not a Changtzu and it does not lean corozo. sent6: if the Togolese is not a Changtzu and not a coonskin the sapphire is a Athena. sent7: if that the perineum is a Athena but it is not a coup does not hold the nasal is not a Changtzu. sent8: if the fact that the nasal is a kind of a Athena that is not a kind of a alphabetizer is false then the burnous is not a cocarboxylase. sent9: the perineum is a Changtzu that is a kind of a coup. sent10: the nasal is a rich if the perineum is a kind of a alphabetizer and does not enfranchise monetization. sent11: if the sapphire is a kind of a Athena the fact that the nasal is a Athena but it is not a alphabetizer is false. sent12: the fact that the fact that the nasal is a alphabetizer that is not a Changtzu is not false does not hold if the Togolese is a kind of a alphabetizer. sent13: the Togolese is not rich. sent14: the Togolese is both not a Changtzu and not a coonskin. sent15: if the fact that the perineum is a coonskin and is not rich is wrong that the Togolese is not a Athena is correct. sent16: the sapphire is not a coup. sent17: if the burnous is not a kind of a cocarboxylase the perineum enfranchises monetization and it is a kind of a coup. sent18: the nasal is a kind of a Athena and is a coonskin. sent19: the burnous is a kind of a gallinacean and is a coonskin. sent20: the Togolese is not a kind of a Changtzu and it is not a kind of a rich. sent21: the perineum is rich. sent22: the Togolese is not a coup if the perineum is a coonskin. sent23: the fact that the perineum is a alphabetizer that is a coup is incorrect if the nasal is a alphabetizer. sent24: if the nasal is not a kind of a Athena then the sapphire is a alphabetizer. sent25: the chopper is not a coup and it is not a piglet. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent14 -> int1: the sapphire is a Athena.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the nasal is a kind of a Athena but it is not a kind of a alphabetizer is incorrect.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the burnous is not a kind of a cocarboxylase.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the perineum does enfranchise monetization and it is a coup.; int4 -> int5: the perineum does enfranchise monetization.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the perineum does enfranchise monetization and it is a rich.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__