the Tabernacle is subtractive.
sent1: the Tabernacle is not a kind of a porkchop if the tarpon twills permeability. sent2: if the fact that something is not neritic and is protozoological is wrong then the fact that it is not a larch is not wrong. sent3: if the fact that the Tabernacle is not protozoological is true it is not a larch. sent4: something is not a larch if that it does not stonewall and is a kind of a drink is wrong. sent5: that the Tabernacle is not neritic but it is protozoological is not true if it is not a kind of a porkchop. sent6: if the fact that the tarpon does not twill permeability and it does not twill Nuphar is false then the Tabernacle is not a porkchop. sent7: the Tabernacle is not topical. sent8: something that is not a kind of a larch is not subtractive but a clown. sent9: something twills lobsterman if it is not a bioelectricity. sent10: the Tabernacle is not non-subtractive if the tarpon is non-subtractive. sent11: that the tarpon does not twill permeability and it does not twill Nuphar is not correct if there is something such that it is non-cognitive. sent12: the Tabernacle is a clown if that it is not a larch is not wrong. sent13: the Tabernacle is a clown. sent14: the tarpon is cognitive if it does twill Nuphar and does not twill permeability. sent15: there is something such that it is not cognitive. sent16: something is not a kind of a Akeridae if the fact that it is non-ecdemic thing that does encapsulate Tabernacle is false. sent17: the Tabernacle does not twill Nuphar if the fact that the fact that the tarpon does not twill permeability and is non-protozoological is not correct is not false. sent18: the fact that the tarpon twills permeability and does not twill Nuphar is false if there exists something such that it is not cognitive.
sent15 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that that the tarpon does not twill permeability and it does not twill Nuphar is right is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the Tabernacle is not a porkchop.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the Tabernacle is not neritic but protozoological is wrong.; sent2 -> int4: the Tabernacle is not a larch if that it is not neritic and it is protozoological is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Tabernacle is not a larch.; sent8 -> int6: if the Tabernacle is not a larch it is not subtractive and it clowns.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Tabernacle is non-subtractive a clown.; int7 -> hypothesis;
if that the galoot does not stonewall and does drink is not true then it is not a larch.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Tabernacle is subtractive. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tabernacle is not a kind of a porkchop if the tarpon twills permeability. sent2: if the fact that something is not neritic and is protozoological is wrong then the fact that it is not a larch is not wrong. sent3: if the fact that the Tabernacle is not protozoological is true it is not a larch. sent4: something is not a larch if that it does not stonewall and is a kind of a drink is wrong. sent5: that the Tabernacle is not neritic but it is protozoological is not true if it is not a kind of a porkchop. sent6: if the fact that the tarpon does not twill permeability and it does not twill Nuphar is false then the Tabernacle is not a porkchop. sent7: the Tabernacle is not topical. sent8: something that is not a kind of a larch is not subtractive but a clown. sent9: something twills lobsterman if it is not a bioelectricity. sent10: the Tabernacle is not non-subtractive if the tarpon is non-subtractive. sent11: that the tarpon does not twill permeability and it does not twill Nuphar is not correct if there is something such that it is non-cognitive. sent12: the Tabernacle is a clown if that it is not a larch is not wrong. sent13: the Tabernacle is a clown. sent14: the tarpon is cognitive if it does twill Nuphar and does not twill permeability. sent15: there is something such that it is not cognitive. sent16: something is not a kind of a Akeridae if the fact that it is non-ecdemic thing that does encapsulate Tabernacle is false. sent17: the Tabernacle does not twill Nuphar if the fact that the fact that the tarpon does not twill permeability and is non-protozoological is not correct is not false. sent18: the fact that the tarpon twills permeability and does not twill Nuphar is false if there exists something such that it is not cognitive. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that that the tarpon does not twill permeability and it does not twill Nuphar is right is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the Tabernacle is not a porkchop.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the Tabernacle is not neritic but protozoological is wrong.; sent2 -> int4: the Tabernacle is not a larch if that it is not neritic and it is protozoological is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Tabernacle is not a larch.; sent8 -> int6: if the Tabernacle is not a larch it is not subtractive and it clowns.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Tabernacle is non-subtractive a clown.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__