there exists something such that it does not intensify martyr and it is excretory.
sent1: something does not intensify martyr. sent2: if the nekton is actinic it is unworthy. sent3: if the nekton is not excretory then the fact that the poleax is not excretory does not hold. sent4: the poleax does not intensify martyr and is excretory if the nekton is not excretory. sent5: if there exists something such that that it does not ratchet lackey and does not prey imaginary is false the sandboy does intensify martyr. sent6: the sandboy is not resentful if the nekton is hydroxy and it is excretory. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is conventional but not radiopaque is not true. sent8: there is something such that it is not conventional and it is not radiopaque. sent9: there is something such that it does not ratchet lackey. sent10: if something preys imaginary it does ratchet lackey. sent11: the poleax is excretory. sent12: there is something such that it is excretory. sent13: there exists something such that that it is both not conventional and radiopaque does not hold. sent14: if the sandboy is not non-Gothic it preys imaginary. sent15: the fact that the nekton is hydroxy is correct if something is radiopaque. sent16: something is a turnout if it is hydroxy. sent17: something does not prey imaginary and is hydroxy. sent18: something does intensify martyr and is excretory. sent19: there exists something such that that it is not conventional and it is not radiopaque is not right. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is both not conventional and not radiopaque is false then the nekton is hydroxy. sent21: the poleax is mild thing that is resentful. sent22: the sandboy is a kind of a Gothic. sent23: if something ratchets lackey it is resentful.
sent19 & sent20 -> int1: the nekton is hydroxy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nekton is excretory.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nekton is hydroxy thing that is excretory.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the sandboy is not resentful.; sent23 -> int4: if the sandboy ratchets lackey then it is resentful.; sent10 -> int5: the sandboy does ratchet lackey if it does prey imaginary.; sent14 & sent22 -> int6: the fact that the sandboy preys imaginary is right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sandboy does ratchet lackey.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the sandboy is resentful.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the nekton is not excretory hold.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the poleax does not intensify martyr and is excretory.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the poleax is a kind of a turnout and it is mild.
sent16 -> int12: the poleax is a kind of a turnout if it is hydroxy.; sent21 -> int13: the fact that the poleax is mild is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does not intensify martyr and it is excretory. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not intensify martyr. sent2: if the nekton is actinic it is unworthy. sent3: if the nekton is not excretory then the fact that the poleax is not excretory does not hold. sent4: the poleax does not intensify martyr and is excretory if the nekton is not excretory. sent5: if there exists something such that that it does not ratchet lackey and does not prey imaginary is false the sandboy does intensify martyr. sent6: the sandboy is not resentful if the nekton is hydroxy and it is excretory. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is conventional but not radiopaque is not true. sent8: there is something such that it is not conventional and it is not radiopaque. sent9: there is something such that it does not ratchet lackey. sent10: if something preys imaginary it does ratchet lackey. sent11: the poleax is excretory. sent12: there is something such that it is excretory. sent13: there exists something such that that it is both not conventional and radiopaque does not hold. sent14: if the sandboy is not non-Gothic it preys imaginary. sent15: the fact that the nekton is hydroxy is correct if something is radiopaque. sent16: something is a turnout if it is hydroxy. sent17: something does not prey imaginary and is hydroxy. sent18: something does intensify martyr and is excretory. sent19: there exists something such that that it is not conventional and it is not radiopaque is not right. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is both not conventional and not radiopaque is false then the nekton is hydroxy. sent21: the poleax is mild thing that is resentful. sent22: the sandboy is a kind of a Gothic. sent23: if something ratchets lackey it is resentful. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent20 -> int1: the nekton is hydroxy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nekton is excretory.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nekton is hydroxy thing that is excretory.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the sandboy is not resentful.; sent23 -> int4: if the sandboy ratchets lackey then it is resentful.; sent10 -> int5: the sandboy does ratchet lackey if it does prey imaginary.; sent14 & sent22 -> int6: the fact that the sandboy preys imaginary is right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sandboy does ratchet lackey.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the sandboy is resentful.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the nekton is not excretory hold.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the poleax does not intensify martyr and is excretory.; int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__