the aquatics does not expire mapping.
sent1: the fact that the aquatics is not a brag and it is not unaggressive is not right. sent2: if the megatherian is not a kind of a salaam then that the aquatics does not broadside entellus but it is an attendant is not true. sent3: if the fact that the aquatics is not chimerical and does not broadside entellus is incorrect it expires mapping. sent4: that the pharmacist is not a kind of a numerator and it is not circulative is not correct if the megatherian is not an attendant. sent5: the megatherian is not a Doomsday. sent6: the aquatics is unaggressive if the fact that it does not expire mapping and it does not broadside entellus is incorrect. sent7: the fact that that the megatherian does clap and is a salaam does not hold is true if it is not a Doomsday. sent8: the fact that the aquatics is not chimerical and does not broadside entellus is false if the tollbooth is not unaggressive. sent9: that the megatherian is not unaggressive and it is not a salaam is wrong if the tollbooth is not an attendant. sent10: something is not an attendant if the fact that it does not clap is correct. sent11: something is not an attendant if the fact that it does clap and is a salaam is not correct. sent12: the fact that the tollbooth is not unaggressive is true if that the pharmacist is not a numerator and it is not circulative does not hold.
sent11 -> int1: the megatherian is not an attendant if that it claps and is a salaam does not hold.; sent7 & sent5 -> int2: that the megatherian claps and is a salaam is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the megatherian is not an attendant.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the pharmacist is not a numerator and is not circulative is incorrect.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the tollbooth is not unaggressive.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that the aquatics is non-chimerical thing that does not broadside entellus is not right.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the aquatics does not expire mapping. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the aquatics is not a brag and it is not unaggressive is not right. sent2: if the megatherian is not a kind of a salaam then that the aquatics does not broadside entellus but it is an attendant is not true. sent3: if the fact that the aquatics is not chimerical and does not broadside entellus is incorrect it expires mapping. sent4: that the pharmacist is not a kind of a numerator and it is not circulative is not correct if the megatherian is not an attendant. sent5: the megatherian is not a Doomsday. sent6: the aquatics is unaggressive if the fact that it does not expire mapping and it does not broadside entellus is incorrect. sent7: the fact that that the megatherian does clap and is a salaam does not hold is true if it is not a Doomsday. sent8: the fact that the aquatics is not chimerical and does not broadside entellus is false if the tollbooth is not unaggressive. sent9: that the megatherian is not unaggressive and it is not a salaam is wrong if the tollbooth is not an attendant. sent10: something is not an attendant if the fact that it does not clap is correct. sent11: something is not an attendant if the fact that it does clap and is a salaam is not correct. sent12: the fact that the tollbooth is not unaggressive is true if that the pharmacist is not a numerator and it is not circulative does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the megatherian is not an attendant if that it claps and is a salaam does not hold.; sent7 & sent5 -> int2: that the megatherian claps and is a salaam is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the megatherian is not an attendant.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the pharmacist is not a numerator and is not circulative is incorrect.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the tollbooth is not unaggressive.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that the aquatics is non-chimerical thing that does not broadside entellus is not right.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__