there is something such that if it is not a seersucker the fact that it is a Grey and mnemonic does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it does not unwrap decadent then that it is a anticonvulsant and it is mayoral does not hold. sent2: the macule is a Grey and mnemonic if it is not a kind of a seersucker. sent3: if something is a seersucker then the fact that it is a Grey that is a mnemonic does not hold. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not limbless hold then the fact that it combusts and it jets is not right. sent5: the fact that the fact that the macule does rouse and it is a Grey is not true is right if it does not bubble wing-nut. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an extension then the fact that it is topological and bubbles discipleship is not true. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is not homozygous hold then that it does impersonate dilapidation and is a kind of a Yaounde does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a seersucker then the fact that it is a kind of a Grey and it is a kind of a mnemonic is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a seersucker it is a Grey and it is a kind of a mnemonic. sent10: if something is not a seersucker then it is both a Grey and mnemonic. sent11: if the macule is not a Jordanian then that it is a kind of a dispersion and is a seersucker is wrong. sent12: if the macule is a seersucker then the fact that it is a Grey and it is a mnemonic is not true. sent13: if the macule is not a Cariama that it is painless a Monodon is not true. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of plagioclastic thing that does bubble immaturity does not hold if it is not a paleface. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a bassinet then the fact that that it does unwrap Melophagus and is ovular is correct is not right. sent16: if the dilapidation does not impersonate vaudevillian then the fact that it is a seersucker and does unwrap interrupt does not hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not Augustan that it is a Fagopyrum and it is a ritual is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a seersucker the fact that it is a Grey and mnemonic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not unwrap decadent then that it is a anticonvulsant and it is mayoral does not hold. sent2: the macule is a Grey and mnemonic if it is not a kind of a seersucker. sent3: if something is a seersucker then the fact that it is a Grey that is a mnemonic does not hold. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not limbless hold then the fact that it combusts and it jets is not right. sent5: the fact that the fact that the macule does rouse and it is a Grey is not true is right if it does not bubble wing-nut. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an extension then the fact that it is topological and bubbles discipleship is not true. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is not homozygous hold then that it does impersonate dilapidation and is a kind of a Yaounde does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a seersucker then the fact that it is a kind of a Grey and it is a kind of a mnemonic is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a seersucker it is a Grey and it is a kind of a mnemonic. sent10: if something is not a seersucker then it is both a Grey and mnemonic. sent11: if the macule is not a Jordanian then that it is a kind of a dispersion and is a seersucker is wrong. sent12: if the macule is a seersucker then the fact that it is a Grey and it is a mnemonic is not true. sent13: if the macule is not a Cariama that it is painless a Monodon is not true. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of plagioclastic thing that does bubble immaturity does not hold if it is not a paleface. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a bassinet then the fact that that it does unwrap Melophagus and is ovular is correct is not right. sent16: if the dilapidation does not impersonate vaudevillian then the fact that it is a seersucker and does unwrap interrupt does not hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not Augustan that it is a Fagopyrum and it is a ritual is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__