that the cuticularness occurs but the briefing outflow does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: the whitingness does not occur. sent2: if the calciferousness but not the irregularness happens the intestateness does not occur. sent3: that the convoy does not occur results in that the Methodist does not occur and the class does not occur. sent4: that both the convoying and the non-whitingness occurs results in that the gantlet does not occur. sent5: the gantlet occurs. sent6: the auditoriness happens. sent7: the cuticularness occurs. sent8: that the briefing photocathode occurs is prevented by that the dichroism but not the derogation happens. sent9: the Methodistness does not occur. sent10: that the Methodist occurs and the class does not occur prevents that the briefing outflow occurs. sent11: the endodonticsness but not the grinding occurs. sent12: if the convoying does not occur the Methodist does not occur. sent13: the fact that that the Methodistness does not occur and the class does not occur is not incorrect brings about that the briefing outflow does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the Methodist happens and the class does not occur does not hold then the Methodist does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the convoy occurs.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: both the convoy and the non-whitingness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the gantlet does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the convoy does not occur hold.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the Methodistness does not occur and the class does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the briefing outflow does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cuticularness but not the briefing outflow happens is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the cuticularness occurs but the briefing outflow does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the whitingness does not occur. sent2: if the calciferousness but not the irregularness happens the intestateness does not occur. sent3: that the convoy does not occur results in that the Methodist does not occur and the class does not occur. sent4: that both the convoying and the non-whitingness occurs results in that the gantlet does not occur. sent5: the gantlet occurs. sent6: the auditoriness happens. sent7: the cuticularness occurs. sent8: that the briefing photocathode occurs is prevented by that the dichroism but not the derogation happens. sent9: the Methodistness does not occur. sent10: that the Methodist occurs and the class does not occur prevents that the briefing outflow occurs. sent11: the endodonticsness but not the grinding occurs. sent12: if the convoying does not occur the Methodist does not occur. sent13: the fact that that the Methodistness does not occur and the class does not occur is not incorrect brings about that the briefing outflow does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the Methodist happens and the class does not occur does not hold then the Methodist does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the convoy occurs.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: both the convoy and the non-whitingness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the gantlet does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the convoy does not occur hold.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the Methodistness does not occur and the class does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the briefing outflow does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__