the fact that the lodgepole slices spathe is right.
sent1: if the nephew fingerprints pension the lodgepole does not slice spathe. sent2: that something is not a Pacific and/or it catalyzes stripper is incorrect if it is not cytoplasmic. sent3: a non-cytoplasmic thing is a kind of a Pacific. sent4: the forebear is a Australopithecus if the fact that that it does not slice pipefish and is not bridgeable hold is not correct. sent5: the fact that the forebear does not slice pipefish and is not bridgeable is not true. sent6: something that is cytoplasmic slices spathe. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is not a Pacific or it catalyzes stripper or both is incorrect then the nephew does fingerprint pension. sent8: the forebear is not a Australopithecus if it is cytoplasmic. sent9: something does not fingerprint scalar if it does slice pipefish. sent10: there is something such that it is a Pacific.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the forebear is cytoplasmic.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the forebear is not a Australopithecus.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the forebear is a kind of a Australopithecus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the forebear is not cytoplasmic.; sent2 -> int5: if the forebear is not cytoplasmic that it is not a kind of a Pacific or it catalyzes stripper or both is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that either the forebear is not a Pacific or it catalyzes stripper or both is not true.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Pacific or it catalyzes stripper or both is not right.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the nephew fingerprints pension.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the lodgepole slices spathe.
sent6 -> int9: the lodgepole does slice spathe if it is cytoplasmic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the lodgepole slices spathe is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nephew fingerprints pension the lodgepole does not slice spathe. sent2: that something is not a Pacific and/or it catalyzes stripper is incorrect if it is not cytoplasmic. sent3: a non-cytoplasmic thing is a kind of a Pacific. sent4: the forebear is a Australopithecus if the fact that that it does not slice pipefish and is not bridgeable hold is not correct. sent5: the fact that the forebear does not slice pipefish and is not bridgeable is not true. sent6: something that is cytoplasmic slices spathe. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is not a Pacific or it catalyzes stripper or both is incorrect then the nephew does fingerprint pension. sent8: the forebear is not a Australopithecus if it is cytoplasmic. sent9: something does not fingerprint scalar if it does slice pipefish. sent10: there is something such that it is a Pacific. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the forebear is cytoplasmic.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the forebear is not a Australopithecus.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the forebear is a kind of a Australopithecus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the forebear is not cytoplasmic.; sent2 -> int5: if the forebear is not cytoplasmic that it is not a kind of a Pacific or it catalyzes stripper or both is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that either the forebear is not a Pacific or it catalyzes stripper or both is not true.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Pacific or it catalyzes stripper or both is not right.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the nephew fingerprints pension.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__