if not the destructiveness but the antiquating occurs then the trafficking does not occur.
sent1: if the on-streetness does not occur then the fact that not the destructiveness but the antiquating occurs is wrong. sent2: that the on-streetness happens and/or the beautification happens prevents that the traffic occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the on-streetness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the non-destructiveness and the antiquating happens is not right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the destructiveness does not occur but the antiquating happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the on-streetness occurs.; int3 -> int4: either the on-streetness or the beautification or both occurs.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the trafficking does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if not the destructiveness but the antiquating occurs then the trafficking does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the on-streetness does not occur then the fact that not the destructiveness but the antiquating occurs is wrong. sent2: that the on-streetness happens and/or the beautification happens prevents that the traffic occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the on-streetness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the non-destructiveness and the antiquating happens is not right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the destructiveness does not occur but the antiquating happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the on-streetness occurs.; int3 -> int4: either the on-streetness or the beautification or both occurs.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the trafficking does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__