the plainclothesman does not uphold aconite.
sent1: the aconite does not finalize plainclothesman and it is non-federal if the fact that it is accommodational hold. sent2: if something is a Bonasa then the fact that it is a kind of a ventilator and is not a merit is not right. sent3: the aconite is accommodational. sent4: the fact that something is both non-accommodational and nonracial if it does criticize audience is not false. sent5: if the fact that something is a ventilator but it is not a merit is not correct it does not criticize audience. sent6: the avatar is a Bonasa if something is not fragrant and it is not a defoliant. sent7: a non-accommodational thing does not criticize kopek and is not a ventilator. sent8: there exists something such that it is not fragrant and is not a defoliant. sent9: if the aconite does not finalize plainclothesman the avatar is not racial. sent10: something does not uphold aconite if it does not criticize audience and is a merit.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the aconite does not finalize plainclothesman and is non-federal.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the aconite does not finalize plainclothesman is right.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the avatar is not racial.; sent10 -> int4: if the plainclothesman does not criticize audience but it is a kind of a merit then it does not uphold aconite.;
the plainclothesman does uphold aconite.
sent5 -> int5: the avatar does not criticize audience if that it is a ventilator and it is not a merit is not right.; sent2 -> int6: that the avatar is a kind of a ventilator but it is not a merit is not true if it is a Bonasa.; sent8 & sent6 -> int7: the avatar is a Bonasa.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the avatar is both a ventilator and not a merit is wrong.; int5 & int8 -> int9: that the avatar does not criticize audience hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it does not criticize audience hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the plainclothesman does not uphold aconite. ; $context$ = sent1: the aconite does not finalize plainclothesman and it is non-federal if the fact that it is accommodational hold. sent2: if something is a Bonasa then the fact that it is a kind of a ventilator and is not a merit is not right. sent3: the aconite is accommodational. sent4: the fact that something is both non-accommodational and nonracial if it does criticize audience is not false. sent5: if the fact that something is a ventilator but it is not a merit is not correct it does not criticize audience. sent6: the avatar is a Bonasa if something is not fragrant and it is not a defoliant. sent7: a non-accommodational thing does not criticize kopek and is not a ventilator. sent8: there exists something such that it is not fragrant and is not a defoliant. sent9: if the aconite does not finalize plainclothesman the avatar is not racial. sent10: something does not uphold aconite if it does not criticize audience and is a merit. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the aconite does not finalize plainclothesman and is non-federal.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the aconite does not finalize plainclothesman is right.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the avatar is not racial.; sent10 -> int4: if the plainclothesman does not criticize audience but it is a kind of a merit then it does not uphold aconite.; __UNKNOWN__