the patronaging heretic occurs.
sent1: the domiciliariness happens if the climacticness occurs and the bronchospasm does not occur. sent2: the climacticness but not the bronchospasm occurs. sent3: the multiplying Durango happens if the xeroradiography happens. sent4: the climacticness happens. sent5: if the multiplying Durango happens the afloatness occurs. sent6: the patronaging heretic happens if the afloatness happens. sent7: the xeroradiography is caused by that the domiciliariness happens.
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the domiciliariness occurs.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the xeroradiography occurs.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the multiplying Durango happens.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the afloatness happens is not wrong.; sent6 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the patronaging heretic occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the domiciliariness happens if the climacticness occurs and the bronchospasm does not occur. sent2: the climacticness but not the bronchospasm occurs. sent3: the multiplying Durango happens if the xeroradiography happens. sent4: the climacticness happens. sent5: if the multiplying Durango happens the afloatness occurs. sent6: the patronaging heretic happens if the afloatness happens. sent7: the xeroradiography is caused by that the domiciliariness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the domiciliariness occurs.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the xeroradiography occurs.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the multiplying Durango happens.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the afloatness happens is not wrong.; sent6 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__