the fact that the ape-man does not strengthen conima and is inelastic is incorrect.
sent1: if the leveret does connect and does strengthen conima then the pisser is not a kind of an elastic. sent2: the cyclone does strengthen conima and is a nailbrush. sent3: the fact that the cyclone does not strengthen conima and does not strengthen Brigit is false if it is not a kind of an elastic. sent4: the ape-man does not append if the fact that the leveret is achondritic thing that connects is not right. sent5: that the ape-man is an elastic but it does not append is not correct. sent6: the leveret appends. sent7: that something is achondritic thing that does connect is false if it does not strengthen Brigit. sent8: the fact that the cyclone strengthens conima is not false. sent9: that the cyclone is not a kind of a compliment hold. sent10: the ape-man does not strengthen Brigit. sent11: the fact that the mercenary is a hydrolith but it is not gutless is not true if it does not strengthen conima. sent12: that the fact that the cyclone is not an elastic and does not strengthen Brigit is incorrect is not false if it is not achondritic. sent13: something does connect if the fact that it does not connect and does not strengthen Brigit is not true. sent14: something does strengthen Brigit if that it does not strengthen Brigit and does not append is not correct. sent15: if the cyclone is not achondritic the fact that it does connect and it does not strengthen Brigit is not right. sent16: that the cyclone does not connect and it does not strengthen Brigit is not correct if it is not achondritic. sent17: if the leveret is an elastic that does append the ape-man does not connect. sent18: if the ape-man is elastic thing that is achondritic the cyclone does not strengthen conima. sent19: if the leveret appends and it is elastic then the cyclone does not connect. sent20: if the leveret is inelastic that the ape-man does not strengthen conima and is not a kind of an inelastic is incorrect. sent21: if the cyclone does not append that it does not connect and it is not an elastic is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leveret is a kind of an elastic.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the leveret appends and it is an elastic.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the cyclone does not connect.; sent13 -> int3: if that that the cyclone does not connect and does not strengthen Brigit is not wrong is incorrect it connect.;
the ape-man does not strengthen conima and is not an elastic.
sent7 -> int4: if the leveret does not strengthen Brigit then the fact that it is achondritic and it does connect is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ape-man does not strengthen conima and is inelastic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the leveret does connect and does strengthen conima then the pisser is not a kind of an elastic. sent2: the cyclone does strengthen conima and is a nailbrush. sent3: the fact that the cyclone does not strengthen conima and does not strengthen Brigit is false if it is not a kind of an elastic. sent4: the ape-man does not append if the fact that the leveret is achondritic thing that connects is not right. sent5: that the ape-man is an elastic but it does not append is not correct. sent6: the leveret appends. sent7: that something is achondritic thing that does connect is false if it does not strengthen Brigit. sent8: the fact that the cyclone strengthens conima is not false. sent9: that the cyclone is not a kind of a compliment hold. sent10: the ape-man does not strengthen Brigit. sent11: the fact that the mercenary is a hydrolith but it is not gutless is not true if it does not strengthen conima. sent12: that the fact that the cyclone is not an elastic and does not strengthen Brigit is incorrect is not false if it is not achondritic. sent13: something does connect if the fact that it does not connect and does not strengthen Brigit is not true. sent14: something does strengthen Brigit if that it does not strengthen Brigit and does not append is not correct. sent15: if the cyclone is not achondritic the fact that it does connect and it does not strengthen Brigit is not right. sent16: that the cyclone does not connect and it does not strengthen Brigit is not correct if it is not achondritic. sent17: if the leveret is an elastic that does append the ape-man does not connect. sent18: if the ape-man is elastic thing that is achondritic the cyclone does not strengthen conima. sent19: if the leveret appends and it is elastic then the cyclone does not connect. sent20: if the leveret is inelastic that the ape-man does not strengthen conima and is not a kind of an inelastic is incorrect. sent21: if the cyclone does not append that it does not connect and it is not an elastic is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leveret is a kind of an elastic.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the leveret appends and it is an elastic.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the cyclone does not connect.; sent13 -> int3: if that that the cyclone does not connect and does not strengthen Brigit is not wrong is incorrect it connect.; __UNKNOWN__