there exists something such that if it is not a Mitchum the fact that it does belabor stridulation and is not a kinglet is false.
sent1: the fact that the SSRI does belabor stridulation and is not a kinglet does not hold if it is not a kind of a Mitchum. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a seller that it buckles and it is not a kind of an iniquity is false. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a Mitchum it does belabor stridulation and it is not a kinglet. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Mitchum that it belabors stridulation and is not a kinglet is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Mitchum then the fact that it does belabor stridulation and it is a kinglet does not hold. sent6: if the SSRI is not a Mitchum then the fact that it belabors stridulation and it is a kinglet is not true. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a feminist that is not an efferent is false if it is not a kind of a kinglet. sent8: if the SSRI is not a Mitchum it belabors stridulation and is not a kinglet. sent9: the fact that the SSRI does belabor stridulation and is not a kind of a kinglet is incorrect if it is a Mitchum.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
that the adjuvant is feminist but it is not efferent is not correct if it is not a kind of a kinglet.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a Mitchum the fact that it does belabor stridulation and is not a kinglet is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the SSRI does belabor stridulation and is not a kinglet does not hold if it is not a kind of a Mitchum. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a seller that it buckles and it is not a kind of an iniquity is false. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a Mitchum it does belabor stridulation and it is not a kinglet. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Mitchum that it belabors stridulation and is not a kinglet is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Mitchum then the fact that it does belabor stridulation and it is a kinglet does not hold. sent6: if the SSRI is not a Mitchum then the fact that it belabors stridulation and it is a kinglet is not true. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a feminist that is not an efferent is false if it is not a kind of a kinglet. sent8: if the SSRI is not a Mitchum it belabors stridulation and is not a kinglet. sent9: the fact that the SSRI does belabor stridulation and is not a kind of a kinglet is incorrect if it is a Mitchum. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__