there exists something such that if it is not aperiodic then the fact that it is adjudicative and it is not noncollapsible is not correct.
sent1: if the photon does not speak erg then it does speak Caligula and it is not a blastoma. sent2: if the magdalen is not aperiodic that it is both adjudicative and not noncollapsible does not hold. sent3: if the fact that something is not Marian is not false then that it is noneffervescent and does not update Neritidae is wrong.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the magdalen is not Marian is not wrong the fact that it is noneffervescent and does not update Neritidae does not hold.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not aperiodic then the fact that it is adjudicative and it is not noncollapsible is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the photon does not speak erg then it does speak Caligula and it is not a blastoma. sent2: if the magdalen is not aperiodic that it is both adjudicative and not noncollapsible does not hold. sent3: if the fact that something is not Marian is not false then that it is noneffervescent and does not update Neritidae is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__