that the tutorial does not occur and the withdrawal does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: that the train does not occur but the combine happens does not hold. sent2: the transferring chiaroscuro does not occur and the doctrinalness does not occur. sent3: the bulbaceousness does not occur. sent4: the immutableness occurs. sent5: the pyroligneousness happens. sent6: that the yaw does not occur is brought about by that the nonexploratoriness and the referring criminalization occurs. sent7: if the sheathing runup happens the fact that the transferring absorptance occurs is not false. sent8: that the sheathing MAO occurs is correct if the referring sanitation does not occur. sent9: the anamorphicness does not occur. sent10: if the tutorialness happens and the transferring absorptance occurs the transferring Lancashire does not occur. sent11: the sign happens. sent12: the withdrawal does not occur. sent13: the sensorineuralness happens. sent14: the fact that that the duster does not occur and the sheathing sannup does not occur is false hold. sent15: the communicativeness does not occur. sent16: the dekko happens. sent17: the swabbing happens if the fact that the remedying does not occur is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the hopping does not occur and the dekko happens is wrong. sent19: the fact that if the DO does not occur the transferring Lancashire and the pyroligneousness occurs hold. sent20: the fact that the sociable happens but the crustalness does not occur is not true. sent21: the DO does not occur. sent22: if the fact that the training does not occur and the combine does not occur does not hold the sheathing runup occurs. sent23: that the training does not occur and the combining does not occur does not hold.
sent22 & sent23 -> int1: the sheathing runup happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the transferring absorptance happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tutorialness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the tutorial and the transferring absorptance occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the transferring Lancashire does not occur is right.; sent19 & sent21 -> int5: the transferring Lancashire occurs and the pyroligneousness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the transferring Lancashire occurs is right.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the tutorialness does not occur.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the tutorial does not occur and the withdrawal does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the train does not occur but the combine happens does not hold. sent2: the transferring chiaroscuro does not occur and the doctrinalness does not occur. sent3: the bulbaceousness does not occur. sent4: the immutableness occurs. sent5: the pyroligneousness happens. sent6: that the yaw does not occur is brought about by that the nonexploratoriness and the referring criminalization occurs. sent7: if the sheathing runup happens the fact that the transferring absorptance occurs is not false. sent8: that the sheathing MAO occurs is correct if the referring sanitation does not occur. sent9: the anamorphicness does not occur. sent10: if the tutorialness happens and the transferring absorptance occurs the transferring Lancashire does not occur. sent11: the sign happens. sent12: the withdrawal does not occur. sent13: the sensorineuralness happens. sent14: the fact that that the duster does not occur and the sheathing sannup does not occur is false hold. sent15: the communicativeness does not occur. sent16: the dekko happens. sent17: the swabbing happens if the fact that the remedying does not occur is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the hopping does not occur and the dekko happens is wrong. sent19: the fact that if the DO does not occur the transferring Lancashire and the pyroligneousness occurs hold. sent20: the fact that the sociable happens but the crustalness does not occur is not true. sent21: the DO does not occur. sent22: if the fact that the training does not occur and the combine does not occur does not hold the sheathing runup occurs. sent23: that the training does not occur and the combining does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent23 -> int1: the sheathing runup happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the transferring absorptance happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tutorialness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the tutorial and the transferring absorptance occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the transferring Lancashire does not occur is right.; sent19 & sent21 -> int5: the transferring Lancashire occurs and the pyroligneousness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the transferring Lancashire occurs is right.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the tutorialness does not occur.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__