the capitate is zygotic thing that is a MIT.
sent1: the fact that something is both a racer and avellan is not true if it is not a kind of a permanent. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is avellan thing that props passer is incorrect then the sepulcher is a permanent. sent3: if something is a brakes then the fact that it does bother is correct. sent4: something is a credibility if it bothers. sent5: the frontierswoman does not prop passer if that it is not avellan and it is a racer is false. sent6: if that the capitate is not a samosa is not wrong it is zygotic. sent7: if that the capitate moors towel hold then it is not a credibility. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not moor Jespersen is right the fact that the Burgess is avellan and does prop passer does not hold. sent9: the fact that the psocid is a samosa and does not moor towel is not correct if the castrato is a kind of a credibility. sent10: that the frontierswoman is non-avellan thing that is a kind of a racer is incorrect if there is something such that it is not a permanent. sent11: the capitate is zygotic and it is a kind of a MIT if it is not a kind of a credibility. sent12: if the frontierswoman does moor Jespersen it is a samosa. sent13: the frontierswoman moors Jespersen if the fact that it does not prop passer is right. sent14: the frontierswoman does not moor Jespersen if the fact that the psocid is a samosa and does not moor towel is not true. sent15: there is something such that that it is a boorishness and does besiege chondrule does not hold. sent16: that the sepulcher does differ and/or is sustentacular is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the sepulcher differs or is sustentacular or both is incorrect then the Burgess is not a permanent. sent18: the capitate is a MIT and it does differ if it is not a racer. sent19: if that the frontierswoman is not a racer and does moor Jespersen does not hold then it is not zygotic. sent20: if something is a kind of a permanent it is a racer.
sent17 & sent16 -> int1: the Burgess is not a permanent.; int1 -> int2: there are impermanent things.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: that the frontierswoman is non-avellan thing that is a racer is not right.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the frontierswoman does not prop passer.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the frontierswoman moors Jespersen.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that the frontierswoman is a samosa is correct.;
that the capitate is zygotic and it is a kind of a MIT is not true.
sent20 -> int7: the sepulcher is a kind of a racer if it is permanent.; sent4 -> int8: the castrato is a credibility if it bothers.; sent3 -> int9: if the castrato is a brakes then it bothers.;
$hypothesis$ = the capitate is zygotic thing that is a MIT. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is both a racer and avellan is not true if it is not a kind of a permanent. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is avellan thing that props passer is incorrect then the sepulcher is a permanent. sent3: if something is a brakes then the fact that it does bother is correct. sent4: something is a credibility if it bothers. sent5: the frontierswoman does not prop passer if that it is not avellan and it is a racer is false. sent6: if that the capitate is not a samosa is not wrong it is zygotic. sent7: if that the capitate moors towel hold then it is not a credibility. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not moor Jespersen is right the fact that the Burgess is avellan and does prop passer does not hold. sent9: the fact that the psocid is a samosa and does not moor towel is not correct if the castrato is a kind of a credibility. sent10: that the frontierswoman is non-avellan thing that is a kind of a racer is incorrect if there is something such that it is not a permanent. sent11: the capitate is zygotic and it is a kind of a MIT if it is not a kind of a credibility. sent12: if the frontierswoman does moor Jespersen it is a samosa. sent13: the frontierswoman moors Jespersen if the fact that it does not prop passer is right. sent14: the frontierswoman does not moor Jespersen if the fact that the psocid is a samosa and does not moor towel is not true. sent15: there is something such that that it is a boorishness and does besiege chondrule does not hold. sent16: that the sepulcher does differ and/or is sustentacular is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the sepulcher differs or is sustentacular or both is incorrect then the Burgess is not a permanent. sent18: the capitate is a MIT and it does differ if it is not a racer. sent19: if that the frontierswoman is not a racer and does moor Jespersen does not hold then it is not zygotic. sent20: if something is a kind of a permanent it is a racer. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent16 -> int1: the Burgess is not a permanent.; int1 -> int2: there are impermanent things.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: that the frontierswoman is non-avellan thing that is a racer is not right.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the frontierswoman does not prop passer.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the frontierswoman moors Jespersen.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that the frontierswoman is a samosa is correct.; __UNKNOWN__