the dulcimer is not a chloroprene.
sent1: if the fact that something is Malaysian and it underquotes hood does not hold then it is not a chloroprene. sent2: the dinoflagellate is a kind of a guide that is not chalybeate if the twerp does guide. sent3: the fact that the dulcimer is a Malaysian and it does underquote hood does not hold if the ani does not underquote hood. sent4: the dinoflagellate is a guide. sent5: if that the twerp does not approbate doubt but it is an immune is wrong then it is a kind of a guide. sent6: that that the twerp approbates doubt and underquotes hood does not hold is true. sent7: something underquotes hood if that it is both a Malaysian and not a massicot is not true. sent8: the twerp underquotes hood but it does not approbate doubt. sent9: that that the dulcimer is a kind of a guide and it is a chloroprene does not hold is right if the fact that the dinoflagellate is not a kind of a chloroprene is not false. sent10: the fact that the ani is not a kind of a chloroprene and underquotes hood does not hold. sent11: the dulcimer is a kind of a chloroprene and it is chalybeate if the fact that the twerp is not a guide is not incorrect. sent12: the ani does not underquote hood if the dinoflagellate does guide but it is not chalybeate. sent13: the dinoflagellate is not a kind of a Malaysian. sent14: if the dulcimer does guide then the dinoflagellate is a guide but it does not underquote hood. sent15: that the twerp does not approbate doubt but it is a kind of an immune is not right. sent16: something is a kind of a ceramic if the fact that it is not a romanticist and it cloys Scopolia does not hold.
sent5 & sent15 -> int1: the twerp is a guide.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the dinoflagellate guides but it is not chalybeate.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the ani does not underquote hood.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the dulcimer is a Malaysian and it does underquote hood is wrong.; sent1 -> int5: the dulcimer is not a chloroprene if that the fact that it is a kind of a Malaysian and it does underquote hood is correct is not true.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the memorizer is the ceramic if the fact that the memorizer is not a romanticist and does cloy Scopolia is not true is true.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the dulcimer is not a chloroprene. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is Malaysian and it underquotes hood does not hold then it is not a chloroprene. sent2: the dinoflagellate is a kind of a guide that is not chalybeate if the twerp does guide. sent3: the fact that the dulcimer is a Malaysian and it does underquote hood does not hold if the ani does not underquote hood. sent4: the dinoflagellate is a guide. sent5: if that the twerp does not approbate doubt but it is an immune is wrong then it is a kind of a guide. sent6: that that the twerp approbates doubt and underquotes hood does not hold is true. sent7: something underquotes hood if that it is both a Malaysian and not a massicot is not true. sent8: the twerp underquotes hood but it does not approbate doubt. sent9: that that the dulcimer is a kind of a guide and it is a chloroprene does not hold is right if the fact that the dinoflagellate is not a kind of a chloroprene is not false. sent10: the fact that the ani is not a kind of a chloroprene and underquotes hood does not hold. sent11: the dulcimer is a kind of a chloroprene and it is chalybeate if the fact that the twerp is not a guide is not incorrect. sent12: the ani does not underquote hood if the dinoflagellate does guide but it is not chalybeate. sent13: the dinoflagellate is not a kind of a Malaysian. sent14: if the dulcimer does guide then the dinoflagellate is a guide but it does not underquote hood. sent15: that the twerp does not approbate doubt but it is a kind of an immune is not right. sent16: something is a kind of a ceramic if the fact that it is not a romanticist and it cloys Scopolia does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent15 -> int1: the twerp is a guide.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the dinoflagellate guides but it is not chalybeate.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the ani does not underquote hood.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the dulcimer is a Malaysian and it does underquote hood is wrong.; sent1 -> int5: the dulcimer is not a chloroprene if that the fact that it is a kind of a Malaysian and it does underquote hood is correct is not true.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__