the elastomer bleeps.
sent1: the elastomer does not bleep if the fact that the mangabey is a rumba that is not unimpressive does not hold. sent2: that the mangabey is both not a rumba and a repeat does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not bleep and it is a rumba is false. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a rumba and not hydroxy is false. sent5: something does not alternate and is not a rumba. sent6: the fact that the lost-and-found is not a repeat and it is not acetylic is not true. sent7: the elastomer does bleep if the lost-and-found is a kind of a rumba. sent8: the modillion is not a rumba if there exists something such that the fact that it does not repeat and is non-hydroxy is not true. sent9: something does alternate and it is amphitheatric if it does not powwow. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a rumba and does not bleep is false. sent11: the fact that the mangabey is not a repeat and not hydroxy is not correct if it is not unimpressive. sent12: there is something such that that it is not unimpressive and it bleeps is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the mangabey is a kind of a repeat and it is a kind of a rumba is not correct. sent14: the elastomer bleeps if the fact that the lost-and-found is not a rumba and is not non-alternate is incorrect. sent15: that the lost-and-found is not a rumba and is alternate is wrong if the modillion is not a rumba. sent16: the elastomer does slice valgus. sent17: that the mangabey is a kind of a repeat that is not hydroxy is incorrect.
the elastomer does not bleep.
sent9 -> int1: if the modillion is not a powwow it is alternate and is amphitheatric.;
$hypothesis$ = the elastomer bleeps. ; $context$ = sent1: the elastomer does not bleep if the fact that the mangabey is a rumba that is not unimpressive does not hold. sent2: that the mangabey is both not a rumba and a repeat does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not bleep and it is a rumba is false. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a rumba and not hydroxy is false. sent5: something does not alternate and is not a rumba. sent6: the fact that the lost-and-found is not a repeat and it is not acetylic is not true. sent7: the elastomer does bleep if the lost-and-found is a kind of a rumba. sent8: the modillion is not a rumba if there exists something such that the fact that it does not repeat and is non-hydroxy is not true. sent9: something does alternate and it is amphitheatric if it does not powwow. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a rumba and does not bleep is false. sent11: the fact that the mangabey is not a repeat and not hydroxy is not correct if it is not unimpressive. sent12: there is something such that that it is not unimpressive and it bleeps is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the mangabey is a kind of a repeat and it is a kind of a rumba is not correct. sent14: the elastomer bleeps if the fact that the lost-and-found is not a rumba and is not non-alternate is incorrect. sent15: that the lost-and-found is not a rumba and is alternate is wrong if the modillion is not a rumba. sent16: the elastomer does slice valgus. sent17: that the mangabey is a kind of a repeat that is not hydroxy is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__