that the wet-nurse does cloud ethicist hold.
sent1: that if there is something such that the fact that it either does not optimize or is a completion or both is wrong the wet-nurse clouds ethicist is not wrong. sent2: the viewgraph is a kind of a fiduciary. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that that it does optimize and/or it is a completion is not wrong is not right then the wet-nurse clouds ethicist. sent4: if something is a kind of a surrender then it is not a kind of a fiduciary and it does cloud ethicist. sent5: the fact that the epicardium does not optimize or it does cloud ethicist or both does not hold if the fact that the wet-nurse is a completion is not false. sent6: that the fact that the epicardium does not optimize and/or it is a completion does not hold is right if the viewgraph is a fiduciary. sent7: there is something such that it does optimize. sent8: the epicardium is a jasper if it is wintry. sent9: the fact that the epicardium does not optimize and/or clouds ethicist does not hold. sent10: the epicardium optimizes. sent11: there exists something such that it does not optimize and/or is a completion. sent12: that the epicardium does optimize is not incorrect if the viewgraph is fiduciary. sent13: if the viewgraph is not a kind of a fiduciary and does cloud ethicist the wet-nurse does not cloud ethicist.
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the epicardium does not optimize and/or it is a completion does not hold is true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not optimize or it is a kind of a completion or both is wrong.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the wet-nurse does not cloud ethicist.
sent4 -> int3: the viewgraph is not a fiduciary and clouds ethicist if it is a surrender.;
$hypothesis$ = that the wet-nurse does cloud ethicist hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that if there is something such that the fact that it either does not optimize or is a completion or both is wrong the wet-nurse clouds ethicist is not wrong. sent2: the viewgraph is a kind of a fiduciary. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that that it does optimize and/or it is a completion is not wrong is not right then the wet-nurse clouds ethicist. sent4: if something is a kind of a surrender then it is not a kind of a fiduciary and it does cloud ethicist. sent5: the fact that the epicardium does not optimize or it does cloud ethicist or both does not hold if the fact that the wet-nurse is a completion is not false. sent6: that the fact that the epicardium does not optimize and/or it is a completion does not hold is right if the viewgraph is a fiduciary. sent7: there is something such that it does optimize. sent8: the epicardium is a jasper if it is wintry. sent9: the fact that the epicardium does not optimize and/or clouds ethicist does not hold. sent10: the epicardium optimizes. sent11: there exists something such that it does not optimize and/or is a completion. sent12: that the epicardium does optimize is not incorrect if the viewgraph is fiduciary. sent13: if the viewgraph is not a kind of a fiduciary and does cloud ethicist the wet-nurse does not cloud ethicist. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the epicardium does not optimize and/or it is a completion does not hold is true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not optimize or it is a kind of a completion or both is wrong.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__