the angelim is preclinical.
sent1: if the clergyman does fit facula then the angelim is not preclinical. sent2: the Prima is ventral if the leper is Falstaffian. sent3: if there exists something such that it is ventral then the clergyman fits facula. sent4: there exists something such that that it does bedizen Dunker is correct. sent5: the fact that the Prima is ventral is not incorrect if the leper is a kind of a eptatretus. sent6: there exists something such that it is distrustful. sent7: the leper is Falstaffian and/or is a kind of a eptatretus if something does bedizen Dunker.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the leper is Falstaffian or is a kind of a eptatretus or both.; int1 & sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the Prima is ventral.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is ventral.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the clergyman fits facula is correct.; sent1 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the angelim is preclinical. ; $context$ = sent1: if the clergyman does fit facula then the angelim is not preclinical. sent2: the Prima is ventral if the leper is Falstaffian. sent3: if there exists something such that it is ventral then the clergyman fits facula. sent4: there exists something such that that it does bedizen Dunker is correct. sent5: the fact that the Prima is ventral is not incorrect if the leper is a kind of a eptatretus. sent6: there exists something such that it is distrustful. sent7: the leper is Falstaffian and/or is a kind of a eptatretus if something does bedizen Dunker. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the leper is Falstaffian or is a kind of a eptatretus or both.; int1 & sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the Prima is ventral.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is ventral.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the clergyman fits facula is correct.; sent1 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__