the cleaving Wintun happens.
sent1: if the chalybeateness does not occur then the fact that both the winglessness and the amalgamativeness occurs is not right. sent2: that the blowout does not occur is caused by that both the cleaving Wintun and the cabinetwork happens. sent3: that the Homericness occurs but the sponsorship does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the stealth occurs. sent5: the loading Garrulus does not occur. sent6: if the blowout happens then that the cleaving Wintun does not occur and the cabinetwork does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the rearing second-rater occurs is prevented by that the winglessness occurs. sent8: the Ephesiansness happens if that not the cleaving orientation but the stealth happens is wrong. sent9: that the Ephesiansness does not occur hold if that the Ephesiansness but not the cleaving orientation occurs is not correct. sent10: the chalybeateness happens if the amalgamativeness does not occur. sent11: that the Ephesians happens brings about the rearing second-rater and/or that the tyrannizing does not occur. sent12: that if the stealth occurs that the Ephesiansness occurs and the cleaving orientation does not occur is not true is not incorrect. sent13: if the Ephesiansness does not occur then both the rearing second-rater and the tyrannizing occurs. sent14: that the chalybeateness happens or that the winglessness happens or both prevents the rearing second-rater. sent15: the fact that the fact that not the cleaving orientation but the stealth happens does not hold if the footwork does not occur is right. sent16: if the blowout does not occur then either the brooding does not occur or the amalgamativeness does not occur or both. sent17: the fact that the chalybeateness happens is not false if the brood does not occur. sent18: the footwork does not occur if the tuition happens. sent19: the cabinetwork occurs. sent20: if that the tentacularness does not occur and the cleaving Abel does not occur is not correct then the tuition occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cleaving Wintun happens.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: both the cleaving Wintun and the cabinetwork happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the blowout does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the brood does not occur or the amalgamativeness does not occur or both.; int3 & sent17 & sent10 -> int4: the chalybeateness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the chalybeateness and/or the winglessness occurs.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the rearing second-rater does not occur.; sent12 & sent4 -> int7: that the Ephesiansness happens and the cleaving orientation does not occur is incorrect.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Ephesiansness does not occur is correct.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: both the rearing second-rater and the tyrannizing occurs.; int9 -> int10: the rearing second-rater occurs.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the cleaving Wintun happens.
$hypothesis$ = the cleaving Wintun happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chalybeateness does not occur then the fact that both the winglessness and the amalgamativeness occurs is not right. sent2: that the blowout does not occur is caused by that both the cleaving Wintun and the cabinetwork happens. sent3: that the Homericness occurs but the sponsorship does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the stealth occurs. sent5: the loading Garrulus does not occur. sent6: if the blowout happens then that the cleaving Wintun does not occur and the cabinetwork does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the rearing second-rater occurs is prevented by that the winglessness occurs. sent8: the Ephesiansness happens if that not the cleaving orientation but the stealth happens is wrong. sent9: that the Ephesiansness does not occur hold if that the Ephesiansness but not the cleaving orientation occurs is not correct. sent10: the chalybeateness happens if the amalgamativeness does not occur. sent11: that the Ephesians happens brings about the rearing second-rater and/or that the tyrannizing does not occur. sent12: that if the stealth occurs that the Ephesiansness occurs and the cleaving orientation does not occur is not true is not incorrect. sent13: if the Ephesiansness does not occur then both the rearing second-rater and the tyrannizing occurs. sent14: that the chalybeateness happens or that the winglessness happens or both prevents the rearing second-rater. sent15: the fact that the fact that not the cleaving orientation but the stealth happens does not hold if the footwork does not occur is right. sent16: if the blowout does not occur then either the brooding does not occur or the amalgamativeness does not occur or both. sent17: the fact that the chalybeateness happens is not false if the brood does not occur. sent18: the footwork does not occur if the tuition happens. sent19: the cabinetwork occurs. sent20: if that the tentacularness does not occur and the cleaving Abel does not occur is not correct then the tuition occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cleaving Wintun happens.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: both the cleaving Wintun and the cabinetwork happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the blowout does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the brood does not occur or the amalgamativeness does not occur or both.; int3 & sent17 & sent10 -> int4: the chalybeateness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the chalybeateness and/or the winglessness occurs.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the rearing second-rater does not occur.; sent12 & sent4 -> int7: that the Ephesiansness happens and the cleaving orientation does not occur is incorrect.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Ephesiansness does not occur is correct.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: both the rearing second-rater and the tyrannizing occurs.; int9 -> int10: the rearing second-rater occurs.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__