the roasting does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the portraiture occurs is not incorrect the pitting impudence occurs. sent2: if the lineation does not occur that the roasting occurs hold. sent3: the roasting does not occur if the fact that both the massage and the roasting occurs does not hold. sent4: the lobbing vasovasostomy occurs. sent5: if the blues occurs the NMR happens. sent6: the portraiture occurs and the shipping occurs. sent7: if the fact that the pitting impudence does not occur is true then that both the homologizing and the wading happens does not hold. sent8: the unexchangeableness happens. sent9: if the fact that the whisk happens is true then the myringotomy does not occur. sent10: if the wading does not occur the homologizing does not occur. sent11: the massage happens. sent12: the roasting does not occur but the unexchangeableness occurs if the massaging does not occur. sent13: if the urging occurs and/or the intermediateness occurs then the lineation does not occur. sent14: the intermediate occurs if not the homologizing but the pitting impudence happens. sent15: if the unexchangeableness and the massaging happens then the wading does not occur. sent16: that the massage happens and the roast occurs is incorrect if the fact that the unexchangeableness does not occur is true.
sent8 & sent11 -> int1: both the unexchangeableness and the massaging occurs.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the wading does not occur.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the homologizing does not occur.; sent6 -> int4: the portraiture happens.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the pitting impudence happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the homologizing does not occur and the pitting impudence happens.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the intermediateness occurs.; int7 -> int8: the urging occurs and/or the intermediateness occurs.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the lineation does not occur.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the roast does not occur is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the roasting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the portraiture occurs is not incorrect the pitting impudence occurs. sent2: if the lineation does not occur that the roasting occurs hold. sent3: the roasting does not occur if the fact that both the massage and the roasting occurs does not hold. sent4: the lobbing vasovasostomy occurs. sent5: if the blues occurs the NMR happens. sent6: the portraiture occurs and the shipping occurs. sent7: if the fact that the pitting impudence does not occur is true then that both the homologizing and the wading happens does not hold. sent8: the unexchangeableness happens. sent9: if the fact that the whisk happens is true then the myringotomy does not occur. sent10: if the wading does not occur the homologizing does not occur. sent11: the massage happens. sent12: the roasting does not occur but the unexchangeableness occurs if the massaging does not occur. sent13: if the urging occurs and/or the intermediateness occurs then the lineation does not occur. sent14: the intermediate occurs if not the homologizing but the pitting impudence happens. sent15: if the unexchangeableness and the massaging happens then the wading does not occur. sent16: that the massage happens and the roast occurs is incorrect if the fact that the unexchangeableness does not occur is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent11 -> int1: both the unexchangeableness and the massaging occurs.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the wading does not occur.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the homologizing does not occur.; sent6 -> int4: the portraiture happens.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the pitting impudence happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the homologizing does not occur and the pitting impudence happens.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the intermediateness occurs.; int7 -> int8: the urging occurs and/or the intermediateness occurs.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the lineation does not occur.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__