the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia.
sent1: the shaman is not a shard. sent2: if the fact that either something is a kind of a shard or it is not echoic or both is not correct then that it is not a Fargo is not incorrect. sent3: that if the fact that the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia and it does not truss prohibition does not hold the Rabbi does not swelter Ajaia is right. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not nonechoic then the shaman is a shard or not nonechoic or both. sent5: if the shaman does not truss prohibition the afterdamp does not swelter Ajaia or is a Fargo or both. sent6: the courthouse is not a Ottoman if something is palpatory. sent7: the lederhosen is both palpatory and a spying if something is a hermitage. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hermitage is incorrect. sent9: the afterdamp trusses prohibition and it is nonechoic if the shaman is not a shard. sent10: if the peptization is boric the neuron is not basidiomycetous but it trusses peptization. sent11: if something does truss prohibition then it is a Fargo. sent12: if the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia then it does truss amberbell and is a praisworthiness. sent13: the vizier is not nonechoic if something is not basidiomycetous but it trusses peptization. sent14: if there exists something such that it trusses amberbell and it is a praisworthiness the fact that the afterdamp is not a kind of a Fargo hold. sent15: the peptization is boric if the courthouse is not a kind of a Ottoman. sent16: if either something is a shard or it is not nonechoic or both then it does not truss prohibition.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the blizzard does truss amberbell and it is a kind of a praisworthiness.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does truss amberbell and it is a praisworthiness.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the afterdamp is not a kind of a Fargo is not incorrect.; sent11 -> int4: the afterdamp is a Fargo if it trusses prohibition.; sent9 & sent1 -> int5: the afterdamp does truss prohibition and is nonechoic.; int5 -> int6: the afterdamp trusses prohibition.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the afterdamp is a Fargo is not false.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia.
sent16 -> int9: the shaman does not truss prohibition if it is a shard and/or is not nonechoic.; sent8 & sent7 -> int10: the lederhosen is palpatory and a spying.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the lederhosen is palpatory hold.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is not non-palpatory.; int12 & sent6 -> int13: the courthouse is not a Ottoman.; sent15 & int13 -> int14: the peptization is boric.; sent10 & int14 -> int15: the neuron is not basidiomycetous but it does truss peptization.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is not basidiomycetous and it trusses peptization.; int16 & sent13 -> int17: the vizier is not nonechoic.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is not nonechoic.; int18 & sent4 -> int19: the shaman is a kind of a shard or it is not nonechoic or both.; int9 & int19 -> int20: the shaman does not truss prohibition.; sent5 & int20 -> int21: either the afterdamp does not swelter Ajaia or it is a Fargo or both.; int21 -> int22: there is something such that it does not swelter Ajaia or it is a Fargo or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia. ; $context$ = sent1: the shaman is not a shard. sent2: if the fact that either something is a kind of a shard or it is not echoic or both is not correct then that it is not a Fargo is not incorrect. sent3: that if the fact that the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia and it does not truss prohibition does not hold the Rabbi does not swelter Ajaia is right. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not nonechoic then the shaman is a shard or not nonechoic or both. sent5: if the shaman does not truss prohibition the afterdamp does not swelter Ajaia or is a Fargo or both. sent6: the courthouse is not a Ottoman if something is palpatory. sent7: the lederhosen is both palpatory and a spying if something is a hermitage. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hermitage is incorrect. sent9: the afterdamp trusses prohibition and it is nonechoic if the shaman is not a shard. sent10: if the peptization is boric the neuron is not basidiomycetous but it trusses peptization. sent11: if something does truss prohibition then it is a Fargo. sent12: if the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia then it does truss amberbell and is a praisworthiness. sent13: the vizier is not nonechoic if something is not basidiomycetous but it trusses peptization. sent14: if there exists something such that it trusses amberbell and it is a praisworthiness the fact that the afterdamp is not a kind of a Fargo hold. sent15: the peptization is boric if the courthouse is not a kind of a Ottoman. sent16: if either something is a shard or it is not nonechoic or both then it does not truss prohibition. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blizzard does not swelter Ajaia.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the blizzard does truss amberbell and it is a kind of a praisworthiness.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does truss amberbell and it is a praisworthiness.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the afterdamp is not a kind of a Fargo is not incorrect.; sent11 -> int4: the afterdamp is a Fargo if it trusses prohibition.; sent9 & sent1 -> int5: the afterdamp does truss prohibition and is nonechoic.; int5 -> int6: the afterdamp trusses prohibition.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the afterdamp is a Fargo is not false.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__