there is something such that if it does crash then the fact that it is not a scorekeeper but a semaphore does not hold.
sent1: if the mural is not irresolute then that it is not a radiotelegraph and it crashes does not hold. sent2: if the abbess does suspend Hawaii then the fact that it is non-indeterminate a fit does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does crash that it is a kind of a scorekeeper that is a semaphore is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it is a paean that it is not a Tree and it notches doubletree is wrong. sent5: that something is non-mortuary thing that does crash is false if it flails. sent6: that the abbess is both not a scorekeeper and a semaphore is false if that it is a crash hold. sent7: the fact that there is something such that if it is econometric then that it does not suspend trample and it is a kind of a queenfish is not true is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it does crash it is both not a scorekeeper and a semaphore. sent9: the abbess is not a kind of a scorekeeper but it does semaphore if it is a crash. sent10: that the fact that the abbess is the scorekeeper and semaphores is not correct if the abbess is a crash is right. sent11: that something does not squat custodian but it is postnatal is not true if the fact that it is a radiotelegraph is not incorrect.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a kind of a radiotelegraph the fact that it does not squat custodian and it is postnatal is false.
sent11 -> int1: if the Communist is a radiotelegraph that it does not squat custodian and it is postnatal is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does crash then the fact that it is not a scorekeeper but a semaphore does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mural is not irresolute then that it is not a radiotelegraph and it crashes does not hold. sent2: if the abbess does suspend Hawaii then the fact that it is non-indeterminate a fit does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does crash that it is a kind of a scorekeeper that is a semaphore is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it is a paean that it is not a Tree and it notches doubletree is wrong. sent5: that something is non-mortuary thing that does crash is false if it flails. sent6: that the abbess is both not a scorekeeper and a semaphore is false if that it is a crash hold. sent7: the fact that there is something such that if it is econometric then that it does not suspend trample and it is a kind of a queenfish is not true is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it does crash it is both not a scorekeeper and a semaphore. sent9: the abbess is not a kind of a scorekeeper but it does semaphore if it is a crash. sent10: that the fact that the abbess is the scorekeeper and semaphores is not correct if the abbess is a crash is right. sent11: that something does not squat custodian but it is postnatal is not true if the fact that it is a radiotelegraph is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__