that there exists something such that if it is non-inductive thing that is a putterer it is a hazelnut is incorrect.
sent1: if something that is not unswept is a fruit it is econometric. sent2: the swaggerer is a Pluto if it is not a putterer and it does excise wrapping. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not presentational and it is a sclerite then it is a kind of a kayak. sent4: the wrapping does replace if it is not a kind of a hazelnut and is rayless. sent5: the wrapping is a kind of a hazelnut if it is inductive and it is a putterer. sent6: there is something such that if it is both inductive and a putterer it is a hazelnut. sent7: if the wrapping is not inductive and is a kind of a putterer it is a hazelnut. sent8: if the peacock-throne is not lunar but it is a kind of a Barthelme it excises polyploidy. sent9: if the wrapping is not a Passover but it is a putterer then that it does perplex swaggerer hold. sent10: there is something such that if it does not excise cannibal and it does perplex Keokuk that it is a Pluto hold. sent11: if a non-esoteric thing is a kind of a putterer then it is bacteriolytic. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a tap and it is a Fourier it is a kind of a blacktop. sent13: there exists something such that if it is hydrodynamic and it derails Myxinidae it is a Vanellus. sent14: the wrapping is ventilatory if it is not a kind of a cool and it is a kind of a putterer. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not esophageal and it does telecast it is citric. sent16: if something that is not a paganism is a hazelnut then it is a kind of a plumbism. sent17: there is something such that if it is not nonproprietary and is a rugby then the fact that it does stigmatize grudging is not incorrect.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
the briquette is bacteriolytic if it is a kind of non-esoteric a putterer.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is non-inductive thing that is a putterer it is a hazelnut is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not unswept is a fruit it is econometric. sent2: the swaggerer is a Pluto if it is not a putterer and it does excise wrapping. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not presentational and it is a sclerite then it is a kind of a kayak. sent4: the wrapping does replace if it is not a kind of a hazelnut and is rayless. sent5: the wrapping is a kind of a hazelnut if it is inductive and it is a putterer. sent6: there is something such that if it is both inductive and a putterer it is a hazelnut. sent7: if the wrapping is not inductive and is a kind of a putterer it is a hazelnut. sent8: if the peacock-throne is not lunar but it is a kind of a Barthelme it excises polyploidy. sent9: if the wrapping is not a Passover but it is a putterer then that it does perplex swaggerer hold. sent10: there is something such that if it does not excise cannibal and it does perplex Keokuk that it is a Pluto hold. sent11: if a non-esoteric thing is a kind of a putterer then it is bacteriolytic. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a tap and it is a Fourier it is a kind of a blacktop. sent13: there exists something such that if it is hydrodynamic and it derails Myxinidae it is a Vanellus. sent14: the wrapping is ventilatory if it is not a kind of a cool and it is a kind of a putterer. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not esophageal and it does telecast it is citric. sent16: if something that is not a paganism is a hazelnut then it is a kind of a plumbism. sent17: there is something such that if it is not nonproprietary and is a rugby then the fact that it does stigmatize grudging is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__