the millstone is non-conjunctival.
sent1: if that the gear does not carjack nationalism hold the ulna is undiplomatic. sent2: the ulna is either plumbic or conjunctival or both. sent3: the triglyceride is Homeric if the Israelite is Homeric. sent4: the boardroom flocks exaggeration if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-plumbic thing that does not segregate ixodid is not true. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it borders and is not a amberjack is not right. sent6: the millstone is xenogeneic. sent7: if the boardroom does carjack nationalism then that it is diplomatic thing that does not flock exaggeration is not right. sent8: the millstone is not conjunctival if the fact that the boardroom is not conjunctival and is undiplomatic is wrong. sent9: the fact that the millstone carjacks nationalism or it is conjunctival or both is not false. sent10: if something is not diplomatic the fact that it is not plumbic and it does not segregate ixodid is incorrect. sent11: the tribologist is a eschatologist. sent12: if the boardroom does flock exaggeration then the fact that the millstone is conjunctival is right. sent13: if the Israelite is sectarian then the triglyceride is Homeric. sent14: the millstone does carjack nationalism. sent15: if the boardroom does not segregate ixodid the ulna flocks exaggeration. sent16: something that is not a handbow is Homeric and/or is a sectarian. sent17: the ulna is undiplomatic if the gear does not carjack nationalism and/or it is a eschatologist. sent18: that the fact that the ulna is not plumbic and not a eschatologist is false is right. sent19: that the gear does not carjack nationalism and/or is a kind of a eschatologist is not incorrect. sent20: that the ulna carjacks nationalism is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is undiplomatic. sent21: the gear does flock exaggeration if the boardroom is a kind of a eschatologist. sent22: something does not flock exaggeration and it is not a eschatologist. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not flock exaggeration and it is not conjunctival is incorrect then the millstone is a kind of a eschatologist. sent24: the millstone is a eschatologist. sent25: either the hydrazine is not a Spender or it does carjack nationalism or both.
sent10 -> int1: if the ulna is undiplomatic then that it is a kind of non-plumbic thing that does not segregate ixodid is not true.; sent17 & sent19 -> int2: the ulna is undiplomatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ulna is a kind of non-plumbic thing that does not segregate ixodid is false.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not plumbic and it does not segregate ixodid is wrong.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the boardroom flocks exaggeration.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the millstone is not conjunctival.
sent16 -> int6: if the gorilla is not a handbow then it is Homeric and/or it is a sectarian.;
$hypothesis$ = the millstone is non-conjunctival. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the gear does not carjack nationalism hold the ulna is undiplomatic. sent2: the ulna is either plumbic or conjunctival or both. sent3: the triglyceride is Homeric if the Israelite is Homeric. sent4: the boardroom flocks exaggeration if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-plumbic thing that does not segregate ixodid is not true. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it borders and is not a amberjack is not right. sent6: the millstone is xenogeneic. sent7: if the boardroom does carjack nationalism then that it is diplomatic thing that does not flock exaggeration is not right. sent8: the millstone is not conjunctival if the fact that the boardroom is not conjunctival and is undiplomatic is wrong. sent9: the fact that the millstone carjacks nationalism or it is conjunctival or both is not false. sent10: if something is not diplomatic the fact that it is not plumbic and it does not segregate ixodid is incorrect. sent11: the tribologist is a eschatologist. sent12: if the boardroom does flock exaggeration then the fact that the millstone is conjunctival is right. sent13: if the Israelite is sectarian then the triglyceride is Homeric. sent14: the millstone does carjack nationalism. sent15: if the boardroom does not segregate ixodid the ulna flocks exaggeration. sent16: something that is not a handbow is Homeric and/or is a sectarian. sent17: the ulna is undiplomatic if the gear does not carjack nationalism and/or it is a eschatologist. sent18: that the fact that the ulna is not plumbic and not a eschatologist is false is right. sent19: that the gear does not carjack nationalism and/or is a kind of a eschatologist is not incorrect. sent20: that the ulna carjacks nationalism is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is undiplomatic. sent21: the gear does flock exaggeration if the boardroom is a kind of a eschatologist. sent22: something does not flock exaggeration and it is not a eschatologist. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not flock exaggeration and it is not conjunctival is incorrect then the millstone is a kind of a eschatologist. sent24: the millstone is a eschatologist. sent25: either the hydrazine is not a Spender or it does carjack nationalism or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the ulna is undiplomatic then that it is a kind of non-plumbic thing that does not segregate ixodid is not true.; sent17 & sent19 -> int2: the ulna is undiplomatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ulna is a kind of non-plumbic thing that does not segregate ixodid is false.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not plumbic and it does not segregate ixodid is wrong.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the boardroom flocks exaggeration.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__