that the demineralizing longan occurs is not incorrect.
sent1: that the sandblasting does not occur but the mandating occurs is not true. sent2: that not the winning but the perpetration occurs does not hold. sent3: the demineralizing wiriness does not occur if the fabricating Permian occurs. sent4: if the demineralizing Acinonyx happens the unicameralness does not occur and the transitivizing occurs. sent5: the demineralizing wiriness does not occur if the chasse occurs and/or the fabricating Permian occurs. sent6: if that not the win but the perpetration occurs does not hold then the demineralizing Acinonyx occurs. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the demineralizing wiriness but not the sandblast occurs is not right the fabricating Permian does not occur is true. sent8: if that the winning happens is not false then the demineralizing Acinonyx happens. sent9: the Zephyr happens. sent10: the strapping Fothergilla does not occur. sent11: the reactiveness occurs. sent12: that the sandblast does not occur and the mandating occurs is triggered by that the demineralizing wiriness does not occur. sent13: the demineralizing longan is triggered by that the chassing does not occur and the unicameralness does not occur. sent14: either the chasse or that the demineralizing longan does not occur or both results in that the demineralizing longan does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chasse happens.; assump1 -> int1: the chassing or the fabricating Permian or both happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the demineralizing wiriness does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the sandblasting does not occur and the mandating happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the chassing does not occur is right.; sent6 & sent2 -> int6: the demineralizing Acinonyx happens.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the unicameralness does not occur but the transitivizing occurs.; int7 -> int8: the unicameralness does not occur.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the chassing does not occur and the unicameralness does not occur.; int9 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the Confucian occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the demineralizing longan occurs is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sandblasting does not occur but the mandating occurs is not true. sent2: that not the winning but the perpetration occurs does not hold. sent3: the demineralizing wiriness does not occur if the fabricating Permian occurs. sent4: if the demineralizing Acinonyx happens the unicameralness does not occur and the transitivizing occurs. sent5: the demineralizing wiriness does not occur if the chasse occurs and/or the fabricating Permian occurs. sent6: if that not the win but the perpetration occurs does not hold then the demineralizing Acinonyx occurs. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the demineralizing wiriness but not the sandblast occurs is not right the fabricating Permian does not occur is true. sent8: if that the winning happens is not false then the demineralizing Acinonyx happens. sent9: the Zephyr happens. sent10: the strapping Fothergilla does not occur. sent11: the reactiveness occurs. sent12: that the sandblast does not occur and the mandating occurs is triggered by that the demineralizing wiriness does not occur. sent13: the demineralizing longan is triggered by that the chassing does not occur and the unicameralness does not occur. sent14: either the chasse or that the demineralizing longan does not occur or both results in that the demineralizing longan does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chasse happens.; assump1 -> int1: the chassing or the fabricating Permian or both happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the demineralizing wiriness does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the sandblasting does not occur and the mandating happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the chassing does not occur is right.; sent6 & sent2 -> int6: the demineralizing Acinonyx happens.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the unicameralness does not occur but the transitivizing occurs.; int7 -> int8: the unicameralness does not occur.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the chassing does not occur and the unicameralness does not occur.; int9 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__