the wrecker is a viol and not a Kwajalein.
sent1: the callus is a kind of a viol if that it is not a kind of a Kwajalein and/or it is postexilic is false. sent2: the patisserie does rotate Jeffersonian. sent3: if that the seatbelt is not a kind of a proof hold that the sailor does not prejudice hakim and is a kind of a proof does not hold. sent4: that the callus is postexilic is right. sent5: the seatbelt is not a proof if the callus gears touchline and it is postexilic. sent6: the fact that the patisserie is not institutional or it does not rotate Jeffersonian or both is incorrect. sent7: if that the sailor is a kind of a viol is not incorrect then the wrecker is a kind of a viol but it is not a kind of a Kwajalein. sent8: if that the patisserie either is noninstitutional or does not rotate Jeffersonian or both does not hold then it bites. sent9: the sailor is a viol if the fact that it does not prejudice hakim and does proof is not true. sent10: the sailor is a proof if the fact that it is not a kind of a viol or it is institutional or both is incorrect. sent11: that if the patisserie is a kind of a bit then the callus does gear touchline hold. sent12: if the patisserie is not institutional then that the seatbelt is not a proof but it is institutional is not correct.
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the patisserie bites.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the callus gears touchline.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the callus does gear touchline and it is not non-postexilic.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the seatbelt is not a proof.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the sailor does not prejudice hakim and proofs is not true.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the sailor is a kind of a viol.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the wrecker is a viol and not a Kwajalein. ; $context$ = sent1: the callus is a kind of a viol if that it is not a kind of a Kwajalein and/or it is postexilic is false. sent2: the patisserie does rotate Jeffersonian. sent3: if that the seatbelt is not a kind of a proof hold that the sailor does not prejudice hakim and is a kind of a proof does not hold. sent4: that the callus is postexilic is right. sent5: the seatbelt is not a proof if the callus gears touchline and it is postexilic. sent6: the fact that the patisserie is not institutional or it does not rotate Jeffersonian or both is incorrect. sent7: if that the sailor is a kind of a viol is not incorrect then the wrecker is a kind of a viol but it is not a kind of a Kwajalein. sent8: if that the patisserie either is noninstitutional or does not rotate Jeffersonian or both does not hold then it bites. sent9: the sailor is a viol if the fact that it does not prejudice hakim and does proof is not true. sent10: the sailor is a proof if the fact that it is not a kind of a viol or it is institutional or both is incorrect. sent11: that if the patisserie is a kind of a bit then the callus does gear touchline hold. sent12: if the patisserie is not institutional then that the seatbelt is not a proof but it is institutional is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the patisserie bites.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the callus gears touchline.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the callus does gear touchline and it is not non-postexilic.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the seatbelt is not a proof.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the sailor does not prejudice hakim and proofs is not true.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the sailor is a kind of a viol.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__