there is something such that if it headquarters khakis that it does not fudge lolly and it is not non-electrostatic is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that something does not fudge lolly but it is electrostatic is incorrect if it is not a moke. sent2: if something that is an edict headquarters hindsight it is not anamorphic. sent3: the ten-spot is not Boolean. sent4: if something is a kind of a tenpence and does headquarter khakis it is not a moke. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not fudge lolly then either the ten-spot does not headquarter khakis or it does not fudge lolly or both. sent6: the eggnog is a tenpence if the fact that either the ten-spot is seductive or it is not a Lyly or both is not true. sent7: the fact that the lolly headquarters khakis is not false if the ten-spot does not headquarters khakis. sent8: the fact that something fudges lolly and it is electrostatic is wrong if it is not a moke. sent9: the fact that the eggnog does fudge lolly and it is electrostatic is not true if it is not a moke. sent10: if the vintager does not adjoin then the fact that it is not a kind of a bluehead and/or it does not headquarter router is not true. sent11: something does not fudge lolly and is electrostatic if it is not a moke. sent12: something that is non-Boolean thing that is not a tenpence is not electrostatic. sent13: the eggnog does not fudge lolly and is electrostatic if it does headquarter khakis. sent14: the fact that the eggnog does fudge lolly and it is electrostatic is not right. sent15: if that the ten-spot is not Boolean is right then that it is not seductive and/or it is not a kind of a Lyly is not correct.
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: that the ten-spot is not seductive or is not a Lyly or both is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the eggnog headquarters khakis is not false.; sent4 -> int2: the eggnog is not a moke if it is a kind of a tenpence and it does headquarter khakis.; sent1 -> int3: that the eggnog does not fudge lolly but it is electrostatic is not correct if the fact that it is not a moke is not incorrect.;
the lolly is electrostatic.
sent12 -> int4: the lolly is electrostatic if it is a kind of non-Boolean thing that is not a tenpence.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it headquarters khakis that it does not fudge lolly and it is not non-electrostatic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not fudge lolly but it is electrostatic is incorrect if it is not a moke. sent2: if something that is an edict headquarters hindsight it is not anamorphic. sent3: the ten-spot is not Boolean. sent4: if something is a kind of a tenpence and does headquarter khakis it is not a moke. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not fudge lolly then either the ten-spot does not headquarter khakis or it does not fudge lolly or both. sent6: the eggnog is a tenpence if the fact that either the ten-spot is seductive or it is not a Lyly or both is not true. sent7: the fact that the lolly headquarters khakis is not false if the ten-spot does not headquarters khakis. sent8: the fact that something fudges lolly and it is electrostatic is wrong if it is not a moke. sent9: the fact that the eggnog does fudge lolly and it is electrostatic is not true if it is not a moke. sent10: if the vintager does not adjoin then the fact that it is not a kind of a bluehead and/or it does not headquarter router is not true. sent11: something does not fudge lolly and is electrostatic if it is not a moke. sent12: something that is non-Boolean thing that is not a tenpence is not electrostatic. sent13: the eggnog does not fudge lolly and is electrostatic if it does headquarter khakis. sent14: the fact that the eggnog does fudge lolly and it is electrostatic is not right. sent15: if that the ten-spot is not Boolean is right then that it is not seductive and/or it is not a kind of a Lyly is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: that the ten-spot is not seductive or is not a Lyly or both is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the eggnog headquarters khakis is not false.; sent4 -> int2: the eggnog is not a moke if it is a kind of a tenpence and it does headquarter khakis.; sent1 -> int3: that the eggnog does not fudge lolly but it is electrostatic is not correct if the fact that it is not a moke is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__