the barring exhibitor occurs and/or the enervation does not occur.
sent1: the barring nine-spot and/or the deglazing hypoxia happens. sent2: not the deglazing struggling but the birr occurs. sent3: the epigastricness does not occur if the liftoff happens and the cytokineticness occurs. sent4: the liftoff occurs if that the deglazing hypoxia happens is right. sent5: the non-epigastricness is prevented by that the deglazing struggling does not occur but the birr happens. sent6: if the barring nine-spot occurs that the liftoff occurs is not wrong. sent7: the barring exhibitor occurs if the cytokineticness does not occur.
sent1 & sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the liftoff occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cytokineticness occurs is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the liftoff and the cytokineticness occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the epigastricness does not occur.; sent5 & sent2 -> int4: the epigastricness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cytokineticness does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the barring exhibitor occurs.; int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the barring exhibitor occurs and/or the enervation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the barring nine-spot and/or the deglazing hypoxia happens. sent2: not the deglazing struggling but the birr occurs. sent3: the epigastricness does not occur if the liftoff happens and the cytokineticness occurs. sent4: the liftoff occurs if that the deglazing hypoxia happens is right. sent5: the non-epigastricness is prevented by that the deglazing struggling does not occur but the birr happens. sent6: if the barring nine-spot occurs that the liftoff occurs is not wrong. sent7: the barring exhibitor occurs if the cytokineticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the liftoff occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cytokineticness occurs is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the liftoff and the cytokineticness occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the epigastricness does not occur.; sent5 & sent2 -> int4: the epigastricness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cytokineticness does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the barring exhibitor occurs.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__