the fact that the director restores Catawba and does not restore subdivision is not correct.
sent1: the maul is connotative. sent2: there is something such that either it is a forte or it is not a kind of a theosophist or both. sent3: the director does dissimilate sashay and it restores Ming. sent4: that the director does restore Catawba but it does not restore subdivision is not correct if that the millrace is not nonpsychoactive is not false. sent5: if the millrace is not nonpsychoactive then the fact that the director restores Catawba and restores subdivision does not hold. sent6: if something is a relations then it does restore Catawba and it does not restore subdivision. sent7: if there is something such that either it is not a forte or it is not a theosophist or both then the petrolatum is a kind of a relations. sent8: something is non-forte and/or it is a theosophist. sent9: that the maul does fritter cesspool if the petrolatum is a kind of a relations hold. sent10: if the maul does fritter cesspool and it is a kind of a canine the millrace is not nonpsychoactive. sent11: something is a relations if it does fritter cesspool. sent12: the director is connotative. sent13: there is something such that it is non-forte and/or it is not a theosophist. sent14: if something is not a theosophist then the petrolatum is a kind of a relations. sent15: if the fact that the petrolatum does not fritter cesspool but it is a canine is not correct the director fritter cesspool. sent16: the petrolatum is a Drogheda. sent17: the fact that the director restores Catawba and restores subdivision does not hold. sent18: something is canine if it restores Ming. sent19: that something does not fritter cesspool and is a canine does not hold if it is not nonpsychoactive. sent20: if the maul is not a canine then the fact that the petrolatum is a kind of a relations and it restores Ming is incorrect. sent21: something is a kind of a llano if it is preventable. sent22: the maul does restore Ming and it is connotative.
sent13 & sent7 -> int1: the petrolatum is a relations.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the maul fritters cesspool.; sent18 -> int3: the maul is a kind of a canine if it restores Ming.; sent22 -> int4: the maul restores Ming.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the maul is canine.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the maul does fritter cesspool and it is canine.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the millrace is not nonpsychoactive.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
if the petrolatum is preventable then it is a llano.
sent21 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the director restores Catawba and does not restore subdivision is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the maul is connotative. sent2: there is something such that either it is a forte or it is not a kind of a theosophist or both. sent3: the director does dissimilate sashay and it restores Ming. sent4: that the director does restore Catawba but it does not restore subdivision is not correct if that the millrace is not nonpsychoactive is not false. sent5: if the millrace is not nonpsychoactive then the fact that the director restores Catawba and restores subdivision does not hold. sent6: if something is a relations then it does restore Catawba and it does not restore subdivision. sent7: if there is something such that either it is not a forte or it is not a theosophist or both then the petrolatum is a kind of a relations. sent8: something is non-forte and/or it is a theosophist. sent9: that the maul does fritter cesspool if the petrolatum is a kind of a relations hold. sent10: if the maul does fritter cesspool and it is a kind of a canine the millrace is not nonpsychoactive. sent11: something is a relations if it does fritter cesspool. sent12: the director is connotative. sent13: there is something such that it is non-forte and/or it is not a theosophist. sent14: if something is not a theosophist then the petrolatum is a kind of a relations. sent15: if the fact that the petrolatum does not fritter cesspool but it is a canine is not correct the director fritter cesspool. sent16: the petrolatum is a Drogheda. sent17: the fact that the director restores Catawba and restores subdivision does not hold. sent18: something is canine if it restores Ming. sent19: that something does not fritter cesspool and is a canine does not hold if it is not nonpsychoactive. sent20: if the maul is not a canine then the fact that the petrolatum is a kind of a relations and it restores Ming is incorrect. sent21: something is a kind of a llano if it is preventable. sent22: the maul does restore Ming and it is connotative. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent7 -> int1: the petrolatum is a relations.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the maul fritters cesspool.; sent18 -> int3: the maul is a kind of a canine if it restores Ming.; sent22 -> int4: the maul restores Ming.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the maul is canine.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the maul does fritter cesspool and it is canine.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the millrace is not nonpsychoactive.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__