there exists something such that if it is not an insurance and/or it is a botanical then that it is not sensible is correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not an insurance then it is not sensible. sent2: that something is not a chiaroscuro is right if either it does not sample cytophotometer or it is terrestrial or both. sent3: there is something such that if it is a botanical then the fact that it is not sensible is correct. sent4: the inulin is insensible if it is not a kind of an insurance or it is a kind of a botanical or both. sent5: the purification is non-isolationist if it is not sensible and/or is a aneroid. sent6: the inulin is not sensible if it is a kind of an insurance and/or it is a botanical. sent7: there exists something such that if it is an insurance and/or it is a botanical then it is not sensible. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Kropotkin or clouds Cherokee or both it is not neurological. sent9: the inulin is not sensible if it is a botanical. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it either is not a kind of an insurance or is a botanical or both is true it is not insensible. sent11: the inulin is sensible if it is not a kind of an insurance and/or is a botanical. sent12: the inulin is not a kind of a botanical if it is disobedient. sent13: if something does not weaken and/or it is a kind of an animator then it is not Nordic.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
if the dormer does not weaken and/or is an animator then it is not Nordic.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not an insurance and/or it is a botanical then that it is not sensible is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not an insurance then it is not sensible. sent2: that something is not a chiaroscuro is right if either it does not sample cytophotometer or it is terrestrial or both. sent3: there is something such that if it is a botanical then the fact that it is not sensible is correct. sent4: the inulin is insensible if it is not a kind of an insurance or it is a kind of a botanical or both. sent5: the purification is non-isolationist if it is not sensible and/or is a aneroid. sent6: the inulin is not sensible if it is a kind of an insurance and/or it is a botanical. sent7: there exists something such that if it is an insurance and/or it is a botanical then it is not sensible. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Kropotkin or clouds Cherokee or both it is not neurological. sent9: the inulin is not sensible if it is a botanical. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it either is not a kind of an insurance or is a botanical or both is true it is not insensible. sent11: the inulin is sensible if it is not a kind of an insurance and/or is a botanical. sent12: the inulin is not a kind of a botanical if it is disobedient. sent13: if something does not weaken and/or it is a kind of an animator then it is not Nordic. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__