that the take-in occurs and the convulsion happens is wrong.
sent1: that the olfactoriness occurs and the caramelizing happens is brought about by that the partying does not occur. sent2: both the take-in and the affairs occurs. sent3: that the menarche and the socialisticness occurs is brought about by that the refinement does not occur. sent4: the party does not occur. sent5: if the unicellularness occurs not the affairs but the anemometry occurs. sent6: the devaluing does not occur if the channeling does not occur. sent7: the convulsion occurs if the anemometry happens. sent8: if the fact that the take-in but not the warming lowness happens is not true then that the warming lowness happens is true. sent9: if the drinking Montevideo happens then the fact that the real-timeness but not the starchiness happens is incorrect. sent10: the channel does not occur if the olfactoriness happens and the menarche occurs. sent11: the unicellularness is caused by the starchiness. sent12: the affairs happens. sent13: that the devaluing does not occur triggers that the consultancy occurs and the drinking Montevideo occurs. sent14: if that the real-timeness but not the starchiness occurs is incorrect the starchiness occurs. sent15: the carbonating Sunnah occurs and the clinicalness occurs. sent16: the anemometry happens. sent17: that that both the take-in and the convulsion occurs hold is not true if the affairs does not occur.
sent2 -> int1: the take-in happens.; sent7 & sent16 -> int2: the convulsion occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the warming lowness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the take-in occurs and the convulsion happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the olfactoriness occurs and the caramelizing happens is brought about by that the partying does not occur. sent2: both the take-in and the affairs occurs. sent3: that the menarche and the socialisticness occurs is brought about by that the refinement does not occur. sent4: the party does not occur. sent5: if the unicellularness occurs not the affairs but the anemometry occurs. sent6: the devaluing does not occur if the channeling does not occur. sent7: the convulsion occurs if the anemometry happens. sent8: if the fact that the take-in but not the warming lowness happens is not true then that the warming lowness happens is true. sent9: if the drinking Montevideo happens then the fact that the real-timeness but not the starchiness happens is incorrect. sent10: the channel does not occur if the olfactoriness happens and the menarche occurs. sent11: the unicellularness is caused by the starchiness. sent12: the affairs happens. sent13: that the devaluing does not occur triggers that the consultancy occurs and the drinking Montevideo occurs. sent14: if that the real-timeness but not the starchiness occurs is incorrect the starchiness occurs. sent15: the carbonating Sunnah occurs and the clinicalness occurs. sent16: the anemometry happens. sent17: that that both the take-in and the convulsion occurs hold is not true if the affairs does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the take-in happens.; sent7 & sent16 -> int2: the convulsion occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__