that the ghetto centers but it does not abjure omentum is not correct.
sent1: the mayfly does abjure omentum. sent2: if the oxalis is not centering but it is superficial it does abjure omentum. sent3: if the oxalis is not a slicer then the ghetto is a kind of a centering that does not abjure omentum. sent4: that the ghetto is centering and abjures omentum does not hold. sent5: if something is not a slicer then the oxalis is not interfacial but it is superficial. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not superficial then the oxalis is not a centering but it does abjure omentum. sent7: the fact that something is not interfacial or it is a slicer or both does not hold if it is not superficial. sent8: the fact that the ghetto centers and does not abjure omentum is not correct if the oxalis does abjure omentum. sent9: if something is a kind of a illogicality and does not extrapolate then it does blemish Kleenex. sent10: if something is non-interfacial and superficial then it does abjure omentum. sent11: the ghetto is not a slicer if that the oxalis is not interfacial or it is a slicer or both is false. sent12: if something that does not preserve Tiu cicatrizes then it is a Mailer. sent13: that that the ghetto is not non-centering and it abjures omentum does not hold if the oxalis abjures omentum is not wrong. sent14: the oxalis is superficial if there is something such that it is not a kind of a slicer. sent15: if that the sinciput is not cataphatic and it is non-demographic is wrong it does not blemish raglan. sent16: if the bootblack does blemish Kleenex the chlorthalidone is cataphatic. sent17: the fact that the oxalis is superficial is not false. sent18: the bootblack is a kind of a illogicality that does not extrapolate. sent19: there exists something such that it is a slicer. sent20: if something does not blemish raglan that it is superficial and it is not interfacial does not hold. sent21: something is not a kind of a slicer. sent22: the fact that if something is not a slicer then it centers and it does not abjure omentum is not false.
sent21 & sent5 -> int1: the oxalis is not interfacial but it is superficial.; sent10 -> int2: that if the oxalis is not interfacial but it is superficial then that the oxalis abjures omentum hold hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the oxalis abjures omentum.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the ghetto is a centering but it does not abjure omentum.
sent22 -> int4: if the ghetto is not a slicer then it is centering thing that does not abjure omentum.; sent7 -> int5: if the oxalis is not superficial then the fact that it is either not interfacial or a slicer or both is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ghetto centers but it does not abjure omentum is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the mayfly does abjure omentum. sent2: if the oxalis is not centering but it is superficial it does abjure omentum. sent3: if the oxalis is not a slicer then the ghetto is a kind of a centering that does not abjure omentum. sent4: that the ghetto is centering and abjures omentum does not hold. sent5: if something is not a slicer then the oxalis is not interfacial but it is superficial. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not superficial then the oxalis is not a centering but it does abjure omentum. sent7: the fact that something is not interfacial or it is a slicer or both does not hold if it is not superficial. sent8: the fact that the ghetto centers and does not abjure omentum is not correct if the oxalis does abjure omentum. sent9: if something is a kind of a illogicality and does not extrapolate then it does blemish Kleenex. sent10: if something is non-interfacial and superficial then it does abjure omentum. sent11: the ghetto is not a slicer if that the oxalis is not interfacial or it is a slicer or both is false. sent12: if something that does not preserve Tiu cicatrizes then it is a Mailer. sent13: that that the ghetto is not non-centering and it abjures omentum does not hold if the oxalis abjures omentum is not wrong. sent14: the oxalis is superficial if there is something such that it is not a kind of a slicer. sent15: if that the sinciput is not cataphatic and it is non-demographic is wrong it does not blemish raglan. sent16: if the bootblack does blemish Kleenex the chlorthalidone is cataphatic. sent17: the fact that the oxalis is superficial is not false. sent18: the bootblack is a kind of a illogicality that does not extrapolate. sent19: there exists something such that it is a slicer. sent20: if something does not blemish raglan that it is superficial and it is not interfacial does not hold. sent21: something is not a kind of a slicer. sent22: the fact that if something is not a slicer then it centers and it does not abjure omentum is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent5 -> int1: the oxalis is not interfacial but it is superficial.; sent10 -> int2: that if the oxalis is not interfacial but it is superficial then that the oxalis abjures omentum hold hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the oxalis abjures omentum.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__