that there exists something such that if the fact that it is hemic and is developmental is not incorrect then it is not evangelistic is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is hemic and it is developmental then it is evangelistic. sent2: a hemic thing that is developmental is not evangelistic. sent3: something is evangelistic if it is both hemic and developmental. sent4: if the boisterousness is developmental and it pyramids then it is not intermediate. sent5: the edelweiss is not esophageal if it does bestrew Hemitripterus and is developmental. sent6: if the boisterousness is hemic and it is developmental that it is evangelistic hold. sent7: something does not manifold if it is an undercut and it is inguinal.
sent2 -> int1: if the boisterousness is not non-hemic and it is not non-developmental it is not evangelistic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is hemic and is developmental is not incorrect then it is not evangelistic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is hemic and it is developmental then it is evangelistic. sent2: a hemic thing that is developmental is not evangelistic. sent3: something is evangelistic if it is both hemic and developmental. sent4: if the boisterousness is developmental and it pyramids then it is not intermediate. sent5: the edelweiss is not esophageal if it does bestrew Hemitripterus and is developmental. sent6: if the boisterousness is hemic and it is developmental that it is evangelistic hold. sent7: something does not manifold if it is an undercut and it is inguinal. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the boisterousness is not non-hemic and it is not non-developmental it is not evangelistic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__