the immobilization occurs.
sent1: the commutableness does not occur. sent2: that the rupestralness occurs is not incorrect. sent3: if that the biliariness happens but the evidentiariness does not occur is not correct the evidentiariness occurs. sent4: the seaworthiness is prevented by the non-superscriptness. sent5: if the seaworthiness does not occur the astronavigation happens. sent6: that the schismaticness does not occur prevents that the patriarchalness occurs. sent7: that the fact that the commensalness occurs and the thinking impregnation happens does not hold is not wrong if the thinking Bosch does not occur. sent8: if the frightening triplicate does not occur then the superscriptness does not occur and/or the immobilization does not occur. sent9: if the effervescentness does not occur that both the biliariness and the non-evidentiaryness occurs is not true. sent10: the evidentiariness does not occur if both the superscript and the frightening triplicate happens. sent11: if the abolition does not occur that the biliariness and the effervescentness occurs does not hold. sent12: the stereoscopicness or the non-satiateness or both occurs. sent13: the frightening triplicate happens. sent14: if the fact that the dissimilating does not occur and/or the villainy does not occur is incorrect the abolition does not occur. sent15: if the frightening Romanian does not occur the astronavigation does not occur and the carding sphagnum occurs. sent16: that either the dissimilating does not occur or the villainy does not occur or both is not correct if the pyrochemicalness does not occur. sent17: the effervescentness does not occur. sent18: the fact that the specific does not occur hold. sent19: the immobilization occurs if either the carding sphagnum happens or the frightening Romanian does not occur or both. sent20: the frightening Dakar does not occur if the fact that the picketing and the assembly happens is true. sent21: the fact that the biliariness and the evidentiariness occurs does not hold. sent22: the fact that the satiating happens hold. sent23: the blueing happens. sent24: the frightening go-slow occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the superscript occurs.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the superscriptness and the frightening triplicate happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the evidentiariness does not occur.; sent9 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the biliariness but not the evidentiariness occurs is not right.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the evidentiariness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the superscript does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the seaworthiness does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the astronavigation occurs.;
the immobilization does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the immobilization occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the commutableness does not occur. sent2: that the rupestralness occurs is not incorrect. sent3: if that the biliariness happens but the evidentiariness does not occur is not correct the evidentiariness occurs. sent4: the seaworthiness is prevented by the non-superscriptness. sent5: if the seaworthiness does not occur the astronavigation happens. sent6: that the schismaticness does not occur prevents that the patriarchalness occurs. sent7: that the fact that the commensalness occurs and the thinking impregnation happens does not hold is not wrong if the thinking Bosch does not occur. sent8: if the frightening triplicate does not occur then the superscriptness does not occur and/or the immobilization does not occur. sent9: if the effervescentness does not occur that both the biliariness and the non-evidentiaryness occurs is not true. sent10: the evidentiariness does not occur if both the superscript and the frightening triplicate happens. sent11: if the abolition does not occur that the biliariness and the effervescentness occurs does not hold. sent12: the stereoscopicness or the non-satiateness or both occurs. sent13: the frightening triplicate happens. sent14: if the fact that the dissimilating does not occur and/or the villainy does not occur is incorrect the abolition does not occur. sent15: if the frightening Romanian does not occur the astronavigation does not occur and the carding sphagnum occurs. sent16: that either the dissimilating does not occur or the villainy does not occur or both is not correct if the pyrochemicalness does not occur. sent17: the effervescentness does not occur. sent18: the fact that the specific does not occur hold. sent19: the immobilization occurs if either the carding sphagnum happens or the frightening Romanian does not occur or both. sent20: the frightening Dakar does not occur if the fact that the picketing and the assembly happens is true. sent21: the fact that the biliariness and the evidentiariness occurs does not hold. sent22: the fact that the satiating happens hold. sent23: the blueing happens. sent24: the frightening go-slow occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the superscript occurs.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the superscriptness and the frightening triplicate happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the evidentiariness does not occur.; sent9 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the biliariness but not the evidentiariness occurs is not right.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the evidentiariness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the superscript does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the seaworthiness does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the astronavigation occurs.; __UNKNOWN__