the linoleum does not brocade.
sent1: the abrogator is not a kind of a hyssop. sent2: the narrow-body samples linoleum if the linac is pilosebaceous. sent3: if something is not a hyssop then it is not violent. sent4: something is not violent but it is a Cephalotus if it is not a kind of a hyssop. sent5: the narrow-body does inflate killifish. sent6: if that the abrogator is violent and it is a Cephalotus is correct the snapper is not a Cephalotus. sent7: if that the narrow-body samples linoleum is not incorrect then that the snapper is a Cephalotus hold. sent8: the snapper is not a Cephalotus if the abrogator is not violent and is a kind of a Cephalotus. sent9: if the abrogator is not a kind of a hyssop that it is nonviolent is true. sent10: if the abrogator is a kind of a Cephalotus the fact that the snapper is violent is not wrong. sent11: something that is not a kind of a brocaded is not pilosebaceous and is a Cephalotus. sent12: the linoleum is not a kind of a hyssop. sent13: if something is not a brocaded then it is not violent. sent14: the abrogator is not violent. sent15: if the linoleum is pilosebaceous the linac is a brocaded. sent16: the fact that something that does not sample linoleum is not a brocaded but a Cephalotus is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the linoleum is a brocaded.; sent4 -> int1: if the abrogator is not a hyssop then it is non-violent a Cephalotus.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the abrogator is not violent but it is a Cephalotus.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the snapper is not a kind of a Cephalotus.;
$hypothesis$ = the linoleum does not brocade. ; $context$ = sent1: the abrogator is not a kind of a hyssop. sent2: the narrow-body samples linoleum if the linac is pilosebaceous. sent3: if something is not a hyssop then it is not violent. sent4: something is not violent but it is a Cephalotus if it is not a kind of a hyssop. sent5: the narrow-body does inflate killifish. sent6: if that the abrogator is violent and it is a Cephalotus is correct the snapper is not a Cephalotus. sent7: if that the narrow-body samples linoleum is not incorrect then that the snapper is a Cephalotus hold. sent8: the snapper is not a Cephalotus if the abrogator is not violent and is a kind of a Cephalotus. sent9: if the abrogator is not a kind of a hyssop that it is nonviolent is true. sent10: if the abrogator is a kind of a Cephalotus the fact that the snapper is violent is not wrong. sent11: something that is not a kind of a brocaded is not pilosebaceous and is a Cephalotus. sent12: the linoleum is not a kind of a hyssop. sent13: if something is not a brocaded then it is not violent. sent14: the abrogator is not violent. sent15: if the linoleum is pilosebaceous the linac is a brocaded. sent16: the fact that something that does not sample linoleum is not a brocaded but a Cephalotus is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the linoleum is a brocaded.; sent4 -> int1: if the abrogator is not a hyssop then it is non-violent a Cephalotus.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the abrogator is not violent but it is a Cephalotus.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the snapper is not a kind of a Cephalotus.; __UNKNOWN__