the minting Lancelot is prevented by the fumbling napery.
sent1: the purifying occurs. sent2: the fact that the minting gigolo occurs is correct. sent3: the minting Pepin occurs. sent4: the drooping occurs. sent5: the non-agonadalness and the alopecicness occurs. sent6: if the fact that the minting aftertaste happens hold that the slicing Trichoptera occurs is correct. sent7: the noise does not occur. sent8: the slicing markhor does not occur. sent9: the fumbling DAT occurs and the fumbling hull happens. sent10: the minting Lancelot occurs. sent11: the minting Lancelot does not occur and the minting Styx does not occur if that the slicing markhor happens is correct. sent12: if both the minting Styx and the upping happens the minting Lancelot does not occur. sent13: the gang-raping happens. sent14: the fumbling napery or the non-upness or both happens if the minting Styx does not occur. sent15: the illicitness happens. sent16: the minting Lancelot occurs if the fumbling napery occurs. sent17: the sadisticness happens if the marbleizing occurs. sent18: if the fumbling napery occurs then the upping happens. sent19: the remise does not occur but the aftershock happens. sent20: that the minting Lancelot occurs is caused by that both the minting Styx and the upness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fumbling napery happens.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the upping occurs.;
that the hypoglycemicness does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = the minting Lancelot is prevented by the fumbling napery. ; $context$ = sent1: the purifying occurs. sent2: the fact that the minting gigolo occurs is correct. sent3: the minting Pepin occurs. sent4: the drooping occurs. sent5: the non-agonadalness and the alopecicness occurs. sent6: if the fact that the minting aftertaste happens hold that the slicing Trichoptera occurs is correct. sent7: the noise does not occur. sent8: the slicing markhor does not occur. sent9: the fumbling DAT occurs and the fumbling hull happens. sent10: the minting Lancelot occurs. sent11: the minting Lancelot does not occur and the minting Styx does not occur if that the slicing markhor happens is correct. sent12: if both the minting Styx and the upping happens the minting Lancelot does not occur. sent13: the gang-raping happens. sent14: the fumbling napery or the non-upness or both happens if the minting Styx does not occur. sent15: the illicitness happens. sent16: the minting Lancelot occurs if the fumbling napery occurs. sent17: the sadisticness happens if the marbleizing occurs. sent18: if the fumbling napery occurs then the upping happens. sent19: the remise does not occur but the aftershock happens. sent20: that the minting Lancelot occurs is caused by that both the minting Styx and the upness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fumbling napery happens.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the upping occurs.; __UNKNOWN__