the gasification is a grammar and is circadian.
sent1: the sommelier does not transpire. sent2: if the melanoblast does not casket siren then the fact that the gasification is a kind of a Toda and it is a grammar is not right. sent3: there exists something such that it is a nakedness. sent4: if something that is non-energetic does not casket bialy then it is not a Toda. sent5: if the technophobe is eponymous then the gasification is a undercharge. sent6: if the fact that something is a Toda and is a grammar does not hold then it is not eponymous. sent7: if that the sommelier does casket siren and it does casket bialy is false then the melanoblast does not casket siren. sent8: the fact that the gasification is a grammar hold. sent9: the melanoblast is a undercharge if the sommelier does undercharge. sent10: the sommelier does casket siren and is a undercharge if it does not transpire. sent11: if the technophobe is not eponymous that the gasification is a grammar and is circadian is not true. sent12: the gasification is circadian if it is a undercharge. sent13: there exists something such that that it does not casket siren is correct. sent14: something is not energetic and it does not casket bialy if that it is not a kind of a dope is right.
the fact that the gasification is a grammar and it is circadian is not correct.
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the sommelier caskets siren and does undercharge.; int1 -> int2: the sommelier is a undercharge.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the melanoblast does undercharge.; sent4 -> int4: if the melanoblast is not energetic and does not casket bialy it is not a Toda.; sent14 -> int5: the melanoblast is not energetic and it does not casket bialy if it does not dope.;
$hypothesis$ = the gasification is a grammar and is circadian. ; $context$ = sent1: the sommelier does not transpire. sent2: if the melanoblast does not casket siren then the fact that the gasification is a kind of a Toda and it is a grammar is not right. sent3: there exists something such that it is a nakedness. sent4: if something that is non-energetic does not casket bialy then it is not a Toda. sent5: if the technophobe is eponymous then the gasification is a undercharge. sent6: if the fact that something is a Toda and is a grammar does not hold then it is not eponymous. sent7: if that the sommelier does casket siren and it does casket bialy is false then the melanoblast does not casket siren. sent8: the fact that the gasification is a grammar hold. sent9: the melanoblast is a undercharge if the sommelier does undercharge. sent10: the sommelier does casket siren and is a undercharge if it does not transpire. sent11: if the technophobe is not eponymous that the gasification is a grammar and is circadian is not true. sent12: the gasification is circadian if it is a undercharge. sent13: there exists something such that that it does not casket siren is correct. sent14: something is not energetic and it does not casket bialy if that it is not a kind of a dope is right. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__