the geophyticness does not occur.
sent1: the invalidness happens if that the supersonicness does not occur is not false. sent2: the downstage does not occur if both the geophyticness and the breeziness occurs. sent3: the downstageness happens and the offering deforestation occurs if the invalidness does not occur. sent4: the invalidness occurs. sent5: the non-supersonicness causes that the invalid and the uncovering happens. sent6: the offering deforestation occurs if the uncovering but not the downstageness occurs. sent7: if that the offering failure occurs is right then that the skinning occurs is not false. sent8: the unbending spikemoss does not occur. sent9: the detoxifying does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the unbending spikemoss happens is not true the fact that the fact that the supersonicness and the uncovering happens is wrong is correct. sent11: if that the supersonicness happens is not incorrect then that both the non-invalidness and the offering deforestation happens is wrong. sent12: the skin occurs if the fact that the offering failure does not occur and the auspices happens is wrong. sent13: the fact that the offering failure and the auspices happens does not hold. sent14: the fact that not the auspices but the offering failure occurs does not hold if the airmail does not occur. sent15: that the intonation happens is correct. sent16: if that the intonation happens or the breeziness does not occur or both is not true then the rumination does not occur. sent17: the skin occurs and/or the detoxifying does not occur. sent18: that the invaliding happens and the detoxifying happens is false if the skinning does not occur. sent19: the skinning does not occur if that not the auspices but the offering failure occurs is not right. sent20: the non-oneiricness results in that both the abiogeneticness and the perfusion occurs. sent21: that not the slamming but the flit happens is not right. sent22: the supersonicness does not occur. sent23: the breeziness and the intonation happens. sent24: the obedience occurs and the geophyticness happens if the uncovering does not occur. sent25: that the offering failure does not occur and the auspices occurs does not hold. sent26: if not the detoxifying but the skinning occurs then the offering deforestation does not occur.
sent23 -> int1: that the breeziness occurs is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the geophyticness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the geophyticness happens and the breeziness occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the downstageness does not occur.; sent5 & sent22 -> int4: both the invaliding and the uncovering occurs.; int4 -> int5: that the uncovering occurs is true.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the uncovering but not the downstageness happens.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the offering deforestation occurs.; sent12 & sent25 -> int8: the skin happens.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the detoxifying does not occur but the skinning happens.; sent26 & int9 -> int10: the offering deforestation does not occur.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the obedience but not the rumination occurs.
sent10 & sent8 -> int12: that the supersonicness and the uncovering happens is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the geophyticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the invalidness happens if that the supersonicness does not occur is not false. sent2: the downstage does not occur if both the geophyticness and the breeziness occurs. sent3: the downstageness happens and the offering deforestation occurs if the invalidness does not occur. sent4: the invalidness occurs. sent5: the non-supersonicness causes that the invalid and the uncovering happens. sent6: the offering deforestation occurs if the uncovering but not the downstageness occurs. sent7: if that the offering failure occurs is right then that the skinning occurs is not false. sent8: the unbending spikemoss does not occur. sent9: the detoxifying does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the unbending spikemoss happens is not true the fact that the fact that the supersonicness and the uncovering happens is wrong is correct. sent11: if that the supersonicness happens is not incorrect then that both the non-invalidness and the offering deforestation happens is wrong. sent12: the skin occurs if the fact that the offering failure does not occur and the auspices happens is wrong. sent13: the fact that the offering failure and the auspices happens does not hold. sent14: the fact that not the auspices but the offering failure occurs does not hold if the airmail does not occur. sent15: that the intonation happens is correct. sent16: if that the intonation happens or the breeziness does not occur or both is not true then the rumination does not occur. sent17: the skin occurs and/or the detoxifying does not occur. sent18: that the invaliding happens and the detoxifying happens is false if the skinning does not occur. sent19: the skinning does not occur if that not the auspices but the offering failure occurs is not right. sent20: the non-oneiricness results in that both the abiogeneticness and the perfusion occurs. sent21: that not the slamming but the flit happens is not right. sent22: the supersonicness does not occur. sent23: the breeziness and the intonation happens. sent24: the obedience occurs and the geophyticness happens if the uncovering does not occur. sent25: that the offering failure does not occur and the auspices occurs does not hold. sent26: if not the detoxifying but the skinning occurs then the offering deforestation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 -> int1: that the breeziness occurs is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the geophyticness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the geophyticness happens and the breeziness occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the downstageness does not occur.; sent5 & sent22 -> int4: both the invaliding and the uncovering occurs.; int4 -> int5: that the uncovering occurs is true.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the uncovering but not the downstageness happens.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the offering deforestation occurs.; sent12 & sent25 -> int8: the skin happens.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the detoxifying does not occur but the skinning happens.; sent26 & int9 -> int10: the offering deforestation does not occur.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__