the letterman is not immiscible.
sent1: that the letterman is immiscible but it is not a canyon does not hold. sent2: the letterman is a charged and is not inboard. sent3: something does not launch color if it does reserve. sent4: there exists something such that that it is uncertain and it does flabbergast Baum is not correct. sent5: the Udmurt is inboard if there exists something such that that it is a radiance but not a counterrevolutionist is not true. sent6: that the breath launches forester and it is a kind of a counterrevolutionist is not correct. sent7: if the letterman is a counterrevolutionist then it is not immiscible. sent8: if the Udmurt is not a canyon then the fact that the breath is a kind of a Perdicidae and it launches forester is not right. sent9: if that the Udmurt is not inboard is not false then the fact that the fact that the breath is a canyon that launches forester is not right hold. sent10: that the hyperope is a kind of a counterrevolutionist is correct. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Perdicidae and it launches forester does not hold that the letterman is not immiscible is not false. sent12: if that something is inboard is not false then it is not a canyon. sent13: if the Udmurt is not inboard that the breath is a kind of a counterrevolutionist and it is a Perdicidae is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that that it does strangulate tenor and does not flabbergast Cynoscion is not correct. sent15: if the Udmurt is not immiscible then that the fact that the hyperope is a canyon and a radiance is right does not hold. sent16: something is not a lockstitch if that it is indivisible is not false. sent17: there is something such that it is inboard and immiscible.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hyperope is a radiance and is not a counterrevolutionist.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hyperope is not a counterrevolutionist is correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hyperope is a kind of a radiance but it is not a counterrevolutionist does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a radiance and it is not a counterrevolutionist is not true.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Udmurt is inboard.; sent12 -> int6: if the Udmurt is inboard the fact that it is not a canyon is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Udmurt is not a canyon.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the breath is a Perdicidae and it launches forester does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Perdicidae that does launch forester is false.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the letterman is not immiscible. ; $context$ = sent1: that the letterman is immiscible but it is not a canyon does not hold. sent2: the letterman is a charged and is not inboard. sent3: something does not launch color if it does reserve. sent4: there exists something such that that it is uncertain and it does flabbergast Baum is not correct. sent5: the Udmurt is inboard if there exists something such that that it is a radiance but not a counterrevolutionist is not true. sent6: that the breath launches forester and it is a kind of a counterrevolutionist is not correct. sent7: if the letterman is a counterrevolutionist then it is not immiscible. sent8: if the Udmurt is not a canyon then the fact that the breath is a kind of a Perdicidae and it launches forester is not right. sent9: if that the Udmurt is not inboard is not false then the fact that the fact that the breath is a canyon that launches forester is not right hold. sent10: that the hyperope is a kind of a counterrevolutionist is correct. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Perdicidae and it launches forester does not hold that the letterman is not immiscible is not false. sent12: if that something is inboard is not false then it is not a canyon. sent13: if the Udmurt is not inboard that the breath is a kind of a counterrevolutionist and it is a Perdicidae is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that that it does strangulate tenor and does not flabbergast Cynoscion is not correct. sent15: if the Udmurt is not immiscible then that the fact that the hyperope is a canyon and a radiance is right does not hold. sent16: something is not a lockstitch if that it is indivisible is not false. sent17: there is something such that it is inboard and immiscible. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hyperope is a radiance and is not a counterrevolutionist.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hyperope is not a counterrevolutionist is correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hyperope is a kind of a radiance but it is not a counterrevolutionist does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a radiance and it is not a counterrevolutionist is not true.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Udmurt is inboard.; sent12 -> int6: if the Udmurt is inboard the fact that it is not a canyon is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Udmurt is not a canyon.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the breath is a Perdicidae and it launches forester does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Perdicidae that does launch forester is false.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__