there exists something such that if it does not impart tribromoethanol and it is theoretical then that it is not a wombat hold.
sent1: something does not outwear if it is an accusative and it imparts howl. sent2: the skibob is not a Hydrophyllum if it does impart tribromoethanol and it is a kind of a stiffness. sent3: something does not impart burdened if it does not outwear and is a Malay. sent4: if the skibob does not impart tribromoethanol but it is theoretical it is a kind of a wombat. sent5: there is something such that if it does not impart adsorption and is a stagecraft then it is not a caecilian. sent6: if something does not impart tribromoethanol and is theoretical then it is a wombat. sent7: if something does mean decompression and is a Sabahan it does not hawk. sent8: if a non-normotensive thing means decompression then it is not a kind of an icing. sent9: the skibob does not prime if it is not theoretical and is a mistreatment. sent10: there is something such that if it does impart tribromoethanol and it is theoretical it is not a wombat. sent11: if the absolutist does not impart tribromoethanol but it is a kind of a latanier then it is not a bull. sent12: the Shaktist is a kind of a wombat if it does not mean Shaktist and piles. sent13: if something that does impart tribromoethanol is theoretical it is not a wombat. sent14: there is something such that if it does not ding premolar and it excretes it does not impart atonement. sent15: something does not ding inconceivability if it is a survivor and is not non-lethargic. sent16: the skibob is not a kind of a wombat if it imparts tribromoethanol and it is theoretical. sent17: there is something such that if it does not impart tribromoethanol and it is theoretical it is a kind of a wombat.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not impart tribromoethanol and it is theoretical then that it is not a wombat hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not outwear if it is an accusative and it imparts howl. sent2: the skibob is not a Hydrophyllum if it does impart tribromoethanol and it is a kind of a stiffness. sent3: something does not impart burdened if it does not outwear and is a Malay. sent4: if the skibob does not impart tribromoethanol but it is theoretical it is a kind of a wombat. sent5: there is something such that if it does not impart adsorption and is a stagecraft then it is not a caecilian. sent6: if something does not impart tribromoethanol and is theoretical then it is a wombat. sent7: if something does mean decompression and is a Sabahan it does not hawk. sent8: if a non-normotensive thing means decompression then it is not a kind of an icing. sent9: the skibob does not prime if it is not theoretical and is a mistreatment. sent10: there is something such that if it does impart tribromoethanol and it is theoretical it is not a wombat. sent11: if the absolutist does not impart tribromoethanol but it is a kind of a latanier then it is not a bull. sent12: the Shaktist is a kind of a wombat if it does not mean Shaktist and piles. sent13: if something that does impart tribromoethanol is theoretical it is not a wombat. sent14: there is something such that if it does not ding premolar and it excretes it does not impart atonement. sent15: something does not ding inconceivability if it is a survivor and is not non-lethargic. sent16: the skibob is not a kind of a wombat if it imparts tribromoethanol and it is theoretical. sent17: there is something such that if it does not impart tribromoethanol and it is theoretical it is a kind of a wombat. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__