the seidel does trisect doubt and it is bony.
sent1: the fact that the shipmate is a partitive and is bony is not right. sent2: the filament is an alexia. sent3: the fact that the seidel does not trisect doubt but it is a kind of a vocative is false if something is subarctic. sent4: if that the shipmate soldiers dysphemism is right that it is partitive and bony is not correct. sent5: there is something such that it is subarctic. sent6: the shipmate soldiers dysphemism if the filament is a kind of an alexia. sent7: the seidel is bony if the fact that the shipmate is not partitive but it is bony does not hold. sent8: if the filament is bony that it does not soldier dysphemism and is an alexia is not right. sent9: if the shipmate is a partitive that the seidel is bony is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a partitive but it is bony is correct is false if it soldiers dysphemism. sent11: the fact that something is a partitive and is bony is incorrect if it soldiers dysphemism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seidel does not trisect doubt.; sent5 & sent3 -> int1: that the seidel does not trisect doubt and is a vocative does not hold.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the shipmate is not partitive and is bony does not hold if it does soldier dysphemism.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: that the shipmate does soldier dysphemism hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the shipmate is both not a partitive and bony is not correct.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the seidel is bony.;
$hypothesis$ = the seidel does trisect doubt and it is bony. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the shipmate is a partitive and is bony is not right. sent2: the filament is an alexia. sent3: the fact that the seidel does not trisect doubt but it is a kind of a vocative is false if something is subarctic. sent4: if that the shipmate soldiers dysphemism is right that it is partitive and bony is not correct. sent5: there is something such that it is subarctic. sent6: the shipmate soldiers dysphemism if the filament is a kind of an alexia. sent7: the seidel is bony if the fact that the shipmate is not partitive but it is bony does not hold. sent8: if the filament is bony that it does not soldier dysphemism and is an alexia is not right. sent9: if the shipmate is a partitive that the seidel is bony is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a partitive but it is bony is correct is false if it soldiers dysphemism. sent11: the fact that something is a partitive and is bony is incorrect if it soldiers dysphemism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seidel does not trisect doubt.; sent5 & sent3 -> int1: that the seidel does not trisect doubt and is a vocative does not hold.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the shipmate is not partitive and is bony does not hold if it does soldier dysphemism.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: that the shipmate does soldier dysphemism hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the shipmate is both not a partitive and bony is not correct.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the seidel is bony.; __UNKNOWN__