the meperidine is not adrenocortical.
sent1: the juggler is not unshapely. sent2: the juggler is not a hen if the loggerhead is an equatorial and it is unshapely. sent3: that the meperidine is both not entomophilous and undrinkable does not hold. sent4: that the loggerhead is not unshapely but it is a kind of a hen does not hold if the fact that the handwheel is not unshapely is not incorrect. sent5: the loggerhead is adrenocortical if the meperidine is an equatorial. sent6: the handwheel is unshapely. sent7: the loggerhead is unshapely. sent8: the meperidine is equatorial. sent9: the proprionamide is entomophilous if the juggler is entomophilous. sent10: that the handwheel is not a kind of a hen and is undrinkable is incorrect if the juggler is not a kind of a hen. sent11: the meperidine is adrenocortical if the fact that the handwheel is both not a hen and undrinkable is incorrect. sent12: the loggerhead does not bump and does subtilize lightsomeness. sent13: that the handwheel is drinkable thing that is a kind of a bump is not right if it is not a hen. sent14: that the handwheel is a hen and undrinkable does not hold. sent15: if something is not an equatorial then that that it is not a bump and does subtilize lightsomeness is not wrong is false. sent16: the loggerhead is a kind of a hen and does subtilize lightsomeness. sent17: the fact that that the meperidine is not a calico but a hen is not correct is not false. sent18: the fact that the meperidine does garner proprionamide and is a kind of a drumstick is not correct. sent19: if the juggler is unshapely then it is an equatorial or it is not adrenocortical or both.
sent15 -> int1: that the loggerhead does not bump and subtilizes lightsomeness is not true if it is not equatorial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the loggerhead is not a kind of an equatorial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the loggerhead does not bump but it does subtilize lightsomeness is false.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the loggerhead is equatorial is not incorrect.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the loggerhead is equatorial thing that is unshapely.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the juggler is not a kind of a hen.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the handwheel is not a hen and not drinkable is not right.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the proprionamide is entomophilous and it is a kind of a hen.
sent3 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not entomophilous and it is undrinkable is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the meperidine is not adrenocortical. ; $context$ = sent1: the juggler is not unshapely. sent2: the juggler is not a hen if the loggerhead is an equatorial and it is unshapely. sent3: that the meperidine is both not entomophilous and undrinkable does not hold. sent4: that the loggerhead is not unshapely but it is a kind of a hen does not hold if the fact that the handwheel is not unshapely is not incorrect. sent5: the loggerhead is adrenocortical if the meperidine is an equatorial. sent6: the handwheel is unshapely. sent7: the loggerhead is unshapely. sent8: the meperidine is equatorial. sent9: the proprionamide is entomophilous if the juggler is entomophilous. sent10: that the handwheel is not a kind of a hen and is undrinkable is incorrect if the juggler is not a kind of a hen. sent11: the meperidine is adrenocortical if the fact that the handwheel is both not a hen and undrinkable is incorrect. sent12: the loggerhead does not bump and does subtilize lightsomeness. sent13: that the handwheel is drinkable thing that is a kind of a bump is not right if it is not a hen. sent14: that the handwheel is a hen and undrinkable does not hold. sent15: if something is not an equatorial then that that it is not a bump and does subtilize lightsomeness is not wrong is false. sent16: the loggerhead is a kind of a hen and does subtilize lightsomeness. sent17: the fact that that the meperidine is not a calico but a hen is not correct is not false. sent18: the fact that the meperidine does garner proprionamide and is a kind of a drumstick is not correct. sent19: if the juggler is unshapely then it is an equatorial or it is not adrenocortical or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: that the loggerhead does not bump and subtilizes lightsomeness is not true if it is not equatorial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the loggerhead is not a kind of an equatorial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the loggerhead does not bump but it does subtilize lightsomeness is false.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the loggerhead is equatorial is not incorrect.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the loggerhead is equatorial thing that is unshapely.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the juggler is not a kind of a hen.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the handwheel is not a hen and not drinkable is not right.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__