the recursion does not occur.
sent1: the approval occurs if the cephalometry happens. sent2: that both the non-glottalness and the twining ophthalmectomy occurs prevents that the queering does not occur. sent3: the ouster occurs and the impact happens if the destruction does not occur. sent4: that the barking mandate does not occur and/or the attending does not occur is caused by that the approval occurs. sent5: the barking Haemosporidia occurs. sent6: that the attending does not occur leads to that the destruction does not occur. sent7: the reallotment happens if the recursion does not occur but the reversionariness happens. sent8: the ovularness does not occur. sent9: that the twining phyllode occurs and/or the reallotment occurs triggers that the ouster does not occur. sent10: the adaptiveness does not occur. sent11: the cephalometry occurs. sent12: the destruction does not occur if the barking mandate does not occur. sent13: both the reversionariness and the Mozambicanness occurs.
sent13 -> int1: the reversionariness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recursion does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the recursion does not occur but the reversionariness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the reallotment happens.; int3 -> int4: the twining phyllode and/or the reallotment happens.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the ouster does not occur.; sent1 & sent11 -> int6: the approval occurs.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the barking mandate does not occur and/or the attending does not occur.; int7 & sent12 & sent6 -> int8: the destruction does not occur.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the ouster occurs and the impact happens.; int9 -> int10: the ouster happens.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the recursion does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the approval occurs if the cephalometry happens. sent2: that both the non-glottalness and the twining ophthalmectomy occurs prevents that the queering does not occur. sent3: the ouster occurs and the impact happens if the destruction does not occur. sent4: that the barking mandate does not occur and/or the attending does not occur is caused by that the approval occurs. sent5: the barking Haemosporidia occurs. sent6: that the attending does not occur leads to that the destruction does not occur. sent7: the reallotment happens if the recursion does not occur but the reversionariness happens. sent8: the ovularness does not occur. sent9: that the twining phyllode occurs and/or the reallotment occurs triggers that the ouster does not occur. sent10: the adaptiveness does not occur. sent11: the cephalometry occurs. sent12: the destruction does not occur if the barking mandate does not occur. sent13: both the reversionariness and the Mozambicanness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the reversionariness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recursion does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the recursion does not occur but the reversionariness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the reallotment happens.; int3 -> int4: the twining phyllode and/or the reallotment happens.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the ouster does not occur.; sent1 & sent11 -> int6: the approval occurs.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the barking mandate does not occur and/or the attending does not occur.; int7 & sent12 & sent6 -> int8: the destruction does not occur.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the ouster occurs and the impact happens.; int9 -> int10: the ouster happens.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__