the Rioja is Pharaonic and/or it interpolates nurser.
sent1: the nurser is an aftereffect. sent2: the nurser is not a ileus. sent3: something that is a rheumatologist is not a Plectophera. sent4: that the fritter is a kind of a dead and it is a Plectophera is correct. sent5: the fact that something does look thill and is not anserine does not hold if it is a ileus. sent6: the Rioja is a kind of a Plectophera and it permits junkyard if the nurser is not a ileus. sent7: there exists something such that it is anserine and does look thill. sent8: if the fact that there is something such that it is anserine and it does look thill is not wrong the Rioja is not a daguerreotype. sent9: if the conserve is not a daguerreotype and/or it permits junkyard then the vacuole is not an aftereffect. sent10: if something is Pharaonic it is not a rhythmicity. sent11: something is an aftereffect if it is not a kind of a rheumatologist. sent12: the count is a kind of a ileus. sent13: the nurser is not a rheumatologist if the vacuole is not a Plectophera and it is not a kind of a rheumatologist. sent14: if the nurser is not Pharaonic then the Rioja is a Plectophera and is a ileus. sent15: the four does not revert if it does permit junkyard. sent16: the nurser is sugarless and it permits Catholic. sent17: the Rioja is Pharaonic if it is a kind of an aftereffect and is not a kind of a daguerreotype. sent18: the fact that the nurser does not interpolate nurser hold. sent19: if the nurser is not a kind of a rheumatologist then that that the Rioja is Pharaonic or interpolates nurser or both is wrong is not wrong.
sent3 -> int1: the Rioja is not a Plectophera if it is a rheumatologist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Rioja is a rheumatologist.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Rioja is not a kind of a Plectophera.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: the Rioja is a kind of a Plectophera and permits junkyard.; int3 -> int4: the Rioja is a Plectophera.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Rioja is not a kind of a rheumatologist.; sent11 -> int7: if the Rioja is not a rheumatologist then it is an aftereffect.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Rioja is an aftereffect.; sent7 & sent8 -> int9: that the Rioja is not a daguerreotype is right.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the Rioja is a kind of an aftereffect that is not a daguerreotype.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the Rioja is Pharaonic.; int11 -> hypothesis;
that the Rioja is Pharaonic and/or it does interpolate nurser does not hold.
sent5 -> int12: the fact that the count does look thill and is not anserine is not right if the fact that it is a ileus hold.; int12 & sent12 -> int13: the fact that the count does look thill and is not anserine is not correct.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it does look thill and is not anserine is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the Rioja is Pharaonic and/or it interpolates nurser. ; $context$ = sent1: the nurser is an aftereffect. sent2: the nurser is not a ileus. sent3: something that is a rheumatologist is not a Plectophera. sent4: that the fritter is a kind of a dead and it is a Plectophera is correct. sent5: the fact that something does look thill and is not anserine does not hold if it is a ileus. sent6: the Rioja is a kind of a Plectophera and it permits junkyard if the nurser is not a ileus. sent7: there exists something such that it is anserine and does look thill. sent8: if the fact that there is something such that it is anserine and it does look thill is not wrong the Rioja is not a daguerreotype. sent9: if the conserve is not a daguerreotype and/or it permits junkyard then the vacuole is not an aftereffect. sent10: if something is Pharaonic it is not a rhythmicity. sent11: something is an aftereffect if it is not a kind of a rheumatologist. sent12: the count is a kind of a ileus. sent13: the nurser is not a rheumatologist if the vacuole is not a Plectophera and it is not a kind of a rheumatologist. sent14: if the nurser is not Pharaonic then the Rioja is a Plectophera and is a ileus. sent15: the four does not revert if it does permit junkyard. sent16: the nurser is sugarless and it permits Catholic. sent17: the Rioja is Pharaonic if it is a kind of an aftereffect and is not a kind of a daguerreotype. sent18: the fact that the nurser does not interpolate nurser hold. sent19: if the nurser is not a kind of a rheumatologist then that that the Rioja is Pharaonic or interpolates nurser or both is wrong is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the Rioja is not a Plectophera if it is a rheumatologist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Rioja is a rheumatologist.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Rioja is not a kind of a Plectophera.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: the Rioja is a kind of a Plectophera and permits junkyard.; int3 -> int4: the Rioja is a Plectophera.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Rioja is not a kind of a rheumatologist.; sent11 -> int7: if the Rioja is not a rheumatologist then it is an aftereffect.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Rioja is an aftereffect.; sent7 & sent8 -> int9: that the Rioja is not a daguerreotype is right.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the Rioja is a kind of an aftereffect that is not a daguerreotype.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the Rioja is Pharaonic.; int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__