that there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a slope and it does poultice pollinator does not hold is not right.
sent1: the fact that something is a thousand and it is a temperament is correct if it is not impervious. sent2: the reproduction is not a slope if it is not a slope and/or it is a Akan. sent3: the reproduction is pervious if the fact that the steppe is not a obliviousness and does not patronage collider does not hold. sent4: that the steppe is not a kind of a obliviousness and does not patronage collider is not true. sent5: something is impervious if it does not poultice pollinator and/or is impervious. sent6: the copper does patronage Angel and is a god. sent7: the fact that something is not a slope but it does poultice pollinator is not true if it is a thousand. sent8: that something is a temperament but not a thousand is not true if it is impervious. sent9: if the fact that the reproduction is a kind of a temperament that is not a thousand is not right the steppe is not a thousand. sent10: the reproduction is pervious if the steppe is a obliviousness. sent11: something does not poultice merman if it is not a thousand.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the reproduction is not impervious.; sent1 -> int2: if the reproduction is not impervious then the fact that it is a thousand and a temperament is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reproduction is a kind of a thousand that is a temperament.; int3 -> int4: the reproduction is a thousand.; sent7 -> int5: if the reproduction is a thousand then the fact that it is not a slope and poultices pollinator does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the reproduction is not a kind of a slope but it does poultice pollinator is not right.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the steppe does not poultice merman.
sent11 -> int7: if the steppe is not a thousand then it does not poultice merman.; sent8 -> int8: that the fact that the reproduction is a kind of a temperament that is not a thousand does not hold is not false if it is impervious.; sent5 -> int9: if the reproduction does not poultice pollinator or it is impervious or both then it is impervious.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a slope and it does poultice pollinator does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a thousand and it is a temperament is correct if it is not impervious. sent2: the reproduction is not a slope if it is not a slope and/or it is a Akan. sent3: the reproduction is pervious if the fact that the steppe is not a obliviousness and does not patronage collider does not hold. sent4: that the steppe is not a kind of a obliviousness and does not patronage collider is not true. sent5: something is impervious if it does not poultice pollinator and/or is impervious. sent6: the copper does patronage Angel and is a god. sent7: the fact that something is not a slope but it does poultice pollinator is not true if it is a thousand. sent8: that something is a temperament but not a thousand is not true if it is impervious. sent9: if the fact that the reproduction is a kind of a temperament that is not a thousand is not right the steppe is not a thousand. sent10: the reproduction is pervious if the steppe is a obliviousness. sent11: something does not poultice merman if it is not a thousand. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the reproduction is not impervious.; sent1 -> int2: if the reproduction is not impervious then the fact that it is a thousand and a temperament is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reproduction is a kind of a thousand that is a temperament.; int3 -> int4: the reproduction is a thousand.; sent7 -> int5: if the reproduction is a thousand then the fact that it is not a slope and poultices pollinator does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the reproduction is not a kind of a slope but it does poultice pollinator is not right.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__