that the proconsularness does not occur and the whammy does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: the convoying exotherm happens or the fixture does not occur or both. sent2: the rumba does not occur. sent3: the straight-arm does not occur but the applauding happens. sent4: the horseshow happens. sent5: that the unwelcomeness does not occur is correct. sent6: the amnesticness does not occur. sent7: the screamer happens. sent8: that not the pinning but the horseshow occurs leads to that the whammy does not occur. sent9: not the convoying macroevolution but the backgrounding happens. sent10: that the unraveling does not occur but the pinning occurs does not hold. sent11: the autocatalyticness does not occur. sent12: the unbending diazepam happens. sent13: that the avoidance does not occur is not false if the rolling does not occur. sent14: the baseball does not occur. sent15: the pairing occurs. sent16: the offering groundsel or the non-demagogicness or both results in that the convoying sigma does not occur. sent17: the agon does not occur. sent18: the fact that the photoelectricity does not occur hold. sent19: if the convoying exotherm occurs the unraveling does not occur. sent20: the fact that the proconsularness does not occur is not incorrect. sent21: the reception occurs. sent22: the oxidizing happens and/or the dissipation does not occur. sent23: the unraveling is prevented by the fact that the convoying exotherm and/or that the fixture does not occur hold.
sent23 & sent1 -> int1: the unraveling does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pinning occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the unraveling but the pinning occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the pinning does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the pinning does not occur and the horseshow happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the whammy does not occur.; int6 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
that the proconsularness does not occur and the whammy does not occur is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the proconsularness does not occur and the whammy does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the convoying exotherm happens or the fixture does not occur or both. sent2: the rumba does not occur. sent3: the straight-arm does not occur but the applauding happens. sent4: the horseshow happens. sent5: that the unwelcomeness does not occur is correct. sent6: the amnesticness does not occur. sent7: the screamer happens. sent8: that not the pinning but the horseshow occurs leads to that the whammy does not occur. sent9: not the convoying macroevolution but the backgrounding happens. sent10: that the unraveling does not occur but the pinning occurs does not hold. sent11: the autocatalyticness does not occur. sent12: the unbending diazepam happens. sent13: that the avoidance does not occur is not false if the rolling does not occur. sent14: the baseball does not occur. sent15: the pairing occurs. sent16: the offering groundsel or the non-demagogicness or both results in that the convoying sigma does not occur. sent17: the agon does not occur. sent18: the fact that the photoelectricity does not occur hold. sent19: if the convoying exotherm occurs the unraveling does not occur. sent20: the fact that the proconsularness does not occur is not incorrect. sent21: the reception occurs. sent22: the oxidizing happens and/or the dissipation does not occur. sent23: the unraveling is prevented by the fact that the convoying exotherm and/or that the fixture does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent1 -> int1: the unraveling does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pinning occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the unraveling but the pinning occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the pinning does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the pinning does not occur and the horseshow happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the whammy does not occur.; int6 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__