the auditoriness occurs.
sent1: that not the encoring but the stylization occurs brings about the non-postictalness. sent2: that the blockage occurs and the exempting asthmatic does not occur is brought about by that the cremating cybercrime does not occur. sent3: if the Kafkaesqueness happens then the encoring does not occur and the stylization occurs. sent4: the auditoriness does not occur and the cremating firewater occurs if the describing breve does not occur. sent5: if the cremating firewater does not occur then the cleaning allomorph does not occur and the Cappadocianness does not occur. sent6: the cremating firewater happens if the describing breve does not occur. sent7: the fact that that the non-auditoryness and the non-commonsness happens is wrong is right if the patching occurs. sent8: the commonsness does not occur if the fact that the repossession does not occur and the describing breve does not occur is wrong. sent9: that the cremating sparkle does not occur and the consecration does not occur prevents that the cremating cybercrime happens. sent10: that the repossession happens but the describing breve does not occur does not hold. sent11: if the repossession occurs then the commonsness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the patching occurs is not incorrect. sent13: that both the commonsness and the patching happens is true. sent14: that both the Kafkaesqueness and the peonage occurs is caused by that the exempting asthmatic does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the postictalness does not occur is not false then the patching happens and the upturn happens. sent16: the repossession does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the repossession does not occur and the describing breve does not occur does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the commonsness does not occur.; sent13 -> int2: the commonsness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the repossession does not occur and the describing breve does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the describing breve does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: both the non-auditoriness and the cremating firewater happens.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the cleaning allomorph does not occur and the Cappadocianness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the auditoriness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the encoring but the stylization occurs brings about the non-postictalness. sent2: that the blockage occurs and the exempting asthmatic does not occur is brought about by that the cremating cybercrime does not occur. sent3: if the Kafkaesqueness happens then the encoring does not occur and the stylization occurs. sent4: the auditoriness does not occur and the cremating firewater occurs if the describing breve does not occur. sent5: if the cremating firewater does not occur then the cleaning allomorph does not occur and the Cappadocianness does not occur. sent6: the cremating firewater happens if the describing breve does not occur. sent7: the fact that that the non-auditoryness and the non-commonsness happens is wrong is right if the patching occurs. sent8: the commonsness does not occur if the fact that the repossession does not occur and the describing breve does not occur is wrong. sent9: that the cremating sparkle does not occur and the consecration does not occur prevents that the cremating cybercrime happens. sent10: that the repossession happens but the describing breve does not occur does not hold. sent11: if the repossession occurs then the commonsness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the patching occurs is not incorrect. sent13: that both the commonsness and the patching happens is true. sent14: that both the Kafkaesqueness and the peonage occurs is caused by that the exempting asthmatic does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the postictalness does not occur is not false then the patching happens and the upturn happens. sent16: the repossession does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the repossession does not occur and the describing breve does not occur does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the commonsness does not occur.; sent13 -> int2: the commonsness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the repossession does not occur and the describing breve does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the describing breve does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: both the non-auditoriness and the cremating firewater happens.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__