the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does not flabbergast colter is true is incorrect.
sent1: if something does not skimp and does launch love-in-a-mist it is not insentient. sent2: the redoubt is not a cobalt if it is not a glycoprotein. sent3: the colter does not relate if it is not shallow-draft. sent4: if a cholinergic thing does diffuse then the lanai does not strangulate Constance. sent5: if something that is a coccyx is a Speaker then the lanai does not skimp. sent6: there exists something such that it is a coccyx and it is a kind of a Speaker. sent7: something does not flabbergast colter if it does not launch love-in-a-mist. sent8: the linseed skimps. sent9: the lanai is insentient. sent10: if the lanai does not flabbergast colter it is not a pair. sent11: there is something such that it is concave. sent12: if there is something such that it is poetic and is a Nejd then the lanai is not a kind of a Speaker. sent13: if something is not plus and is a fleabane it does not trim. sent14: the fact that the lanai is not a kind of a coccyx hold.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the lanai does not skimp.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the lanai launches love-in-a-mist is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lanai does not skimp and launches love-in-a-mist.; sent1 -> int3: the lanai is not insentient if it does not skimp and it launches love-in-a-mist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the lanai is not insentient.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the lanai does not launch love-in-a-mist.; sent7 -> int7: the fact that the lanai does not flabbergast colter is correct if that it does not launch love-in-a-mist is correct.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the lanai does not flabbergast colter.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does not flabbergast colter is true is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not skimp and does launch love-in-a-mist it is not insentient. sent2: the redoubt is not a cobalt if it is not a glycoprotein. sent3: the colter does not relate if it is not shallow-draft. sent4: if a cholinergic thing does diffuse then the lanai does not strangulate Constance. sent5: if something that is a coccyx is a Speaker then the lanai does not skimp. sent6: there exists something such that it is a coccyx and it is a kind of a Speaker. sent7: something does not flabbergast colter if it does not launch love-in-a-mist. sent8: the linseed skimps. sent9: the lanai is insentient. sent10: if the lanai does not flabbergast colter it is not a pair. sent11: there is something such that it is concave. sent12: if there is something such that it is poetic and is a Nejd then the lanai is not a kind of a Speaker. sent13: if something is not plus and is a fleabane it does not trim. sent14: the fact that the lanai is not a kind of a coccyx hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the lanai does not skimp.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the lanai launches love-in-a-mist is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lanai does not skimp and launches love-in-a-mist.; sent1 -> int3: the lanai is not insentient if it does not skimp and it launches love-in-a-mist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the lanai is not insentient.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the lanai does not launch love-in-a-mist.; sent7 -> int7: the fact that the lanai does not flabbergast colter is correct if that it does not launch love-in-a-mist is correct.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the lanai does not flabbergast colter.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__