the Tudor is a wad.
sent1: that if the clamp is not chaffy the clamp does not account and does bother hold. sent2: that the ham does hum clamp is not incorrect if the Pamlico is chaffy but it is not Aramean. sent3: the Tudor is a covert. sent4: the fact that something does not piddle refectory but it does squeegee is wrong if it does hum clamp. sent5: there are Serbian things. sent6: the Tudor is a wad if there is something such that it is a belting. sent7: the Tudor outstares Shakers. sent8: the Tudor is not a belting. sent9: the y-axis is a kind of a squeegee. sent10: the y-axis is chaffy. sent11: the y-axis is a quadrupling. sent12: the y-axis is a squeegee if something is chaffy. sent13: the y-axis hums clamp and is chaffy. sent14: something is a squeegee if it is not a belting. sent15: there exists something such that it is a wad. sent16: something does not piddle refectory but it squeegees if it is not a belting. sent17: if the y-axis does not belt then it is a squeegee. sent18: if something is not chaffy it is not a belting but a wad.
sent16 -> int1: if the y-axis is not a belting then it does not piddle refectory and it does squeegee.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the y-axis is not a belting.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the y-axis does not piddle refectory and does squeegee.; sent4 -> int3: if the y-axis hums clamp then the fact that it does not piddle refectory and squeegees does not hold.; sent13 -> int4: the y-axis does hum clamp.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the y-axis does not piddle refectory and does squeegee is wrong.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the y-axis is a belting.; int7 -> int8: the fact that something belts hold.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the Tudor is not a wad.
$hypothesis$ = the Tudor is a wad. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the clamp is not chaffy the clamp does not account and does bother hold. sent2: that the ham does hum clamp is not incorrect if the Pamlico is chaffy but it is not Aramean. sent3: the Tudor is a covert. sent4: the fact that something does not piddle refectory but it does squeegee is wrong if it does hum clamp. sent5: there are Serbian things. sent6: the Tudor is a wad if there is something such that it is a belting. sent7: the Tudor outstares Shakers. sent8: the Tudor is not a belting. sent9: the y-axis is a kind of a squeegee. sent10: the y-axis is chaffy. sent11: the y-axis is a quadrupling. sent12: the y-axis is a squeegee if something is chaffy. sent13: the y-axis hums clamp and is chaffy. sent14: something is a squeegee if it is not a belting. sent15: there exists something such that it is a wad. sent16: something does not piddle refectory but it squeegees if it is not a belting. sent17: if the y-axis does not belt then it is a squeegee. sent18: if something is not chaffy it is not a belting but a wad. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the y-axis is not a belting then it does not piddle refectory and it does squeegee.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the y-axis is not a belting.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the y-axis does not piddle refectory and does squeegee.; sent4 -> int3: if the y-axis hums clamp then the fact that it does not piddle refectory and squeegees does not hold.; sent13 -> int4: the y-axis does hum clamp.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the y-axis does not piddle refectory and does squeegee is wrong.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the y-axis is a belting.; int7 -> int8: the fact that something belts hold.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__