the punk is auscultatory and is a peneplain.
sent1: that the punk is both auscultatory and a peneplain is not correct if the maharaja is not a Qibla. sent2: if there is something such that it either is not an undesirable or is not a Qibla or both the punk is not a Pretender. sent3: if something is not revivalistic then it is a kind of a sinker and reunifies. sent4: if the pruning does bilk greenness then that the bowhead is not a kind of a Pretender is correct. sent5: the punk is a peneplain. sent6: if the allomorph is not a Pretender then the fact that either it does not extricate Wain or it is not an undesirable or both does not hold. sent7: if the Baedeker is a sinker and it does reunify then the hyssop is not a kind of a naivete. sent8: something is auscultatory and is a peneplain if it is not a Pretender. sent9: the maharaja is not a Pretender if that the bowhead is an undesirable and is homeopathic is not true. sent10: if there is something such that it does not extricate Wain either the bowhead is not undesirable or it is not a Qibla or both. sent11: if the maharaja is not a kind of a pull-through the allomorph does not extricate Wain. sent12: the bowhead is not an undesirable and/or it is a kind of a Qibla. sent13: if there is something such that it does not extricate Wain then the bowhead is an undesirable and/or not a Qibla. sent14: that the branchlet is not Liechtensteiner or is not revivalistic or both hold if it is not a kind of a pentlandite. sent15: either the bowhead is not desirable or it is not a Qibla or both. sent16: something does not bellow or it does not extricate abecedarius or both. sent17: if the hyssop is not a kind of a naivete then the pruning does bilk greenness and is a forties. sent18: that the maharaja is homeopathic and it is a kind of a pull-through is not right. sent19: there is something such that either it is not a kind of an undesirable or it is a kind of a Qibla or both. sent20: if the fact that the maharaja is both homeopathic and a pull-through is incorrect the allomorph does not extricate Wain. sent21: the allomorph is not a Pretender if the bowhead is not a Pretender.
sent20 & sent18 -> int1: the allomorph does not extricate Wain.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not extricate Wain.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the bowhead is either not an undesirable or not a Qibla or both.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an undesirable or it is not a kind of a Qibla or both.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the punk is not a Pretender is not wrong.; sent8 -> int6: if the punk is not a kind of a Pretender it is both auscultatory and a peneplain.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the punk is auscultatory and it is a peneplain is false.
sent3 -> int7: the Baedeker is a kind of a sinker and reunifies if it is not revivalistic.;
$hypothesis$ = the punk is auscultatory and is a peneplain. ; $context$ = sent1: that the punk is both auscultatory and a peneplain is not correct if the maharaja is not a Qibla. sent2: if there is something such that it either is not an undesirable or is not a Qibla or both the punk is not a Pretender. sent3: if something is not revivalistic then it is a kind of a sinker and reunifies. sent4: if the pruning does bilk greenness then that the bowhead is not a kind of a Pretender is correct. sent5: the punk is a peneplain. sent6: if the allomorph is not a Pretender then the fact that either it does not extricate Wain or it is not an undesirable or both does not hold. sent7: if the Baedeker is a sinker and it does reunify then the hyssop is not a kind of a naivete. sent8: something is auscultatory and is a peneplain if it is not a Pretender. sent9: the maharaja is not a Pretender if that the bowhead is an undesirable and is homeopathic is not true. sent10: if there is something such that it does not extricate Wain either the bowhead is not undesirable or it is not a Qibla or both. sent11: if the maharaja is not a kind of a pull-through the allomorph does not extricate Wain. sent12: the bowhead is not an undesirable and/or it is a kind of a Qibla. sent13: if there is something such that it does not extricate Wain then the bowhead is an undesirable and/or not a Qibla. sent14: that the branchlet is not Liechtensteiner or is not revivalistic or both hold if it is not a kind of a pentlandite. sent15: either the bowhead is not desirable or it is not a Qibla or both. sent16: something does not bellow or it does not extricate abecedarius or both. sent17: if the hyssop is not a kind of a naivete then the pruning does bilk greenness and is a forties. sent18: that the maharaja is homeopathic and it is a kind of a pull-through is not right. sent19: there is something such that either it is not a kind of an undesirable or it is a kind of a Qibla or both. sent20: if the fact that the maharaja is both homeopathic and a pull-through is incorrect the allomorph does not extricate Wain. sent21: the allomorph is not a Pretender if the bowhead is not a Pretender. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent18 -> int1: the allomorph does not extricate Wain.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not extricate Wain.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the bowhead is either not an undesirable or not a Qibla or both.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an undesirable or it is not a kind of a Qibla or both.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the punk is not a Pretender is not wrong.; sent8 -> int6: if the punk is not a kind of a Pretender it is both auscultatory and a peneplain.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__