the ingrate does not believe molestation.
sent1: if the fact that the hyson is both nocturnal and a bannock is not right the ctene is not a kind of a Sax. sent2: the ingrate does not believe molestation if the fact that the hyson does believe molestation and is not nocturnal does not hold. sent3: there is something such that that it reports Salomon hold. sent4: that that the marlberry believes molestation and is a twinkler does not hold is right. sent5: something that is a monogamist or a pitching or both does not negotiate Hinault. sent6: the fact that the ctene does not negotiate ctene is true. sent7: the fact that the fact that the hyson is nocturnal and a bannock is not correct is correct if there is something such that it reports Salomon. sent8: the ingrate believes molestation if the protection does report millivolt. sent9: if something that is not a Sax does not negotiate Hinault then that the protection does report millivolt is correct. sent10: the ctene is a pitching.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the hyson is nocturnal and it is a kind of a bannock is not true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ctene is not a Sax.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the ctene does not negotiate Hinault is true if it is a monogamist and/or it is a kind of a pitching.; sent10 -> int4: the ctene is a monogamist and/or does pitch.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ctene does not negotiate Hinault.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the ctene is not a Sax and does not negotiate Hinault.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Sax and it does not negotiate Hinault.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the protection reports millivolt.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the ingrate does not believe molestation.
$hypothesis$ = the ingrate does not believe molestation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the hyson is both nocturnal and a bannock is not right the ctene is not a kind of a Sax. sent2: the ingrate does not believe molestation if the fact that the hyson does believe molestation and is not nocturnal does not hold. sent3: there is something such that that it reports Salomon hold. sent4: that that the marlberry believes molestation and is a twinkler does not hold is right. sent5: something that is a monogamist or a pitching or both does not negotiate Hinault. sent6: the fact that the ctene does not negotiate ctene is true. sent7: the fact that the fact that the hyson is nocturnal and a bannock is not correct is correct if there is something such that it reports Salomon. sent8: the ingrate believes molestation if the protection does report millivolt. sent9: if something that is not a Sax does not negotiate Hinault then that the protection does report millivolt is correct. sent10: the ctene is a pitching. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the hyson is nocturnal and it is a kind of a bannock is not true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ctene is not a Sax.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the ctene does not negotiate Hinault is true if it is a monogamist and/or it is a kind of a pitching.; sent10 -> int4: the ctene is a monogamist and/or does pitch.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ctene does not negotiate Hinault.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the ctene is not a Sax and does not negotiate Hinault.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Sax and it does not negotiate Hinault.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the protection reports millivolt.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__