the flavin is a kind of an oblate.
sent1: the squall is flexible. sent2: the brioche does not trace yellowfin if it is not sessile. sent3: the brioche is a meekness. sent4: the laurelwood is credulous if the fact that the brewer is non-onshore thing that does not trace yellowfin is false. sent5: the brewer is a kind of an oblate. sent6: something is a kind of a conglomerate if it is a meekness. sent7: if the brioche is not flexible but it is a kind of a meekness then the brewer is a meekness. sent8: that the flavin is not non-oblate is not incorrect if something that is not sessile is a conglomerate. sent9: the brewer is a nonstop. sent10: the leg is onshore. sent11: the fact that the flavin is an oblate or is not a conglomerate or both is right if it is a carrycot. sent12: the brewer does trace yellowfin. sent13: if the brewer does trace yellowfin and is a conglomerate then the brioche is a conglomerate. sent14: The yellowfin does trace brewer. sent15: the brioche is not flexible but it is a meekness. sent16: something is not sessile if it is a kind of onshore thing that traces yellowfin. sent17: if there is something such that it is a meekness and it is flexible the icicle is not sessile. sent18: there exists something such that it does not queen air-intake. sent19: the brioche is a conglomerate and/or it is not sessile if there is something such that it is sessile. sent20: the fact that the flavin is not a kind of an oblate is not false if the fact that either the brewer is an oblate or it is onshore or both is false. sent21: the brewer is onshore. sent22: the apex is non-onshore and a Lichtenstein. sent23: the conservatory is not a mistral. sent24: that something is not onshore and does not trace yellowfin is false if it is not a conglomerate. sent25: the streptodornase does trace yellowfin. sent26: something is sessile and it is a conglomerate. sent27: the squall is both a meekness and a carrycot if the conservatory is not a mistral.
sent21 & sent12 -> int1: the brewer is onshore and it traces yellowfin.; sent16 -> int2: the brewer is not sessile if it is onshore and does trace yellowfin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the brewer is not sessile is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the brewer is not a meekness is not right it is a kind of a conglomerate.; sent7 & sent15 -> int5: the brewer is a meekness.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the brewer is a conglomerate is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the brewer is not sessile but it is a kind of a conglomerate.; int7 -> int8: something is not sessile but a conglomerate.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the flavin is not oblate.
sent27 & sent23 -> int9: the squall is a meekness and it is a carrycot.; int9 -> int10: the squall is a meekness.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the squall is a meekness that is flexible.; int11 -> int12: something is a meekness that is flexible.; int12 & sent17 -> int13: the icicle is not sessile.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not sessile.; int14 & sent19 -> int15: the brioche is a conglomerate and/or is not sessile.;
$hypothesis$ = the flavin is a kind of an oblate. ; $context$ = sent1: the squall is flexible. sent2: the brioche does not trace yellowfin if it is not sessile. sent3: the brioche is a meekness. sent4: the laurelwood is credulous if the fact that the brewer is non-onshore thing that does not trace yellowfin is false. sent5: the brewer is a kind of an oblate. sent6: something is a kind of a conglomerate if it is a meekness. sent7: if the brioche is not flexible but it is a kind of a meekness then the brewer is a meekness. sent8: that the flavin is not non-oblate is not incorrect if something that is not sessile is a conglomerate. sent9: the brewer is a nonstop. sent10: the leg is onshore. sent11: the fact that the flavin is an oblate or is not a conglomerate or both is right if it is a carrycot. sent12: the brewer does trace yellowfin. sent13: if the brewer does trace yellowfin and is a conglomerate then the brioche is a conglomerate. sent14: The yellowfin does trace brewer. sent15: the brioche is not flexible but it is a meekness. sent16: something is not sessile if it is a kind of onshore thing that traces yellowfin. sent17: if there is something such that it is a meekness and it is flexible the icicle is not sessile. sent18: there exists something such that it does not queen air-intake. sent19: the brioche is a conglomerate and/or it is not sessile if there is something such that it is sessile. sent20: the fact that the flavin is not a kind of an oblate is not false if the fact that either the brewer is an oblate or it is onshore or both is false. sent21: the brewer is onshore. sent22: the apex is non-onshore and a Lichtenstein. sent23: the conservatory is not a mistral. sent24: that something is not onshore and does not trace yellowfin is false if it is not a conglomerate. sent25: the streptodornase does trace yellowfin. sent26: something is sessile and it is a conglomerate. sent27: the squall is both a meekness and a carrycot if the conservatory is not a mistral. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent12 -> int1: the brewer is onshore and it traces yellowfin.; sent16 -> int2: the brewer is not sessile if it is onshore and does trace yellowfin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the brewer is not sessile is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the brewer is not a meekness is not right it is a kind of a conglomerate.; sent7 & sent15 -> int5: the brewer is a meekness.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the brewer is a conglomerate is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the brewer is not sessile but it is a kind of a conglomerate.; int7 -> int8: something is not sessile but a conglomerate.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__