the pakchoi does not axe journey.
sent1: the newswoman does not acidify and/or it rambles perishable. sent2: everything does not ramble VHF and/or rambles copperware. sent3: that everything is not gymnastic and/or it is not useful is not incorrect. sent4: the pakchoi is not wieldy and/or does axe journey. sent5: the nodule does not axe journey. sent6: if something does not acidify and/or it does ramble perishable then it does not acidify. sent7: something is non-censorial thing that does explicate if it is not hydropathic. sent8: the pakchoi is not a hybridoma or it does ramble zygotene or both. sent9: if the ictodosaur is not hydropathic the anchor is not hydropathic. sent10: that something rambles anchor and crosscuts is false if it does not acidify. sent11: the Guarnerius does not axe journey. sent12: if something does not ramble VHF or does ramble copperware or both then the fact that it does not axe journey is correct. sent13: if something is not censorial and explicates it does not axe journey. sent14: the pakchoi is not a thirst. sent15: if something does not ramble anchor the fact that it is not hydropathic or it is censorial or both is not correct. sent16: that something does explicate and does axe journey is not wrong if it is not censorial. sent17: the nipple does not axe journey. sent18: if something does not elongate it is not a diarist. sent19: if the fact that the ictodosaur is not hydropathic and/or it is censorial does not hold the pakchoi is not censorial.
sent2 -> int1: the pakchoi either does not ramble VHF or does ramble copperware or both.; sent12 -> int2: if the pakchoi does not ramble VHF or rambles copperware or both the fact that it does not axe journey hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the anchor does not axe journey.
sent13 -> int3: if the anchor is not censorial and explicates then it does not axe journey.; sent7 -> int4: the anchor is not censorial but it explicates if that it is not hydropathic is not wrong.; sent10 -> int5: the fact that that the newswoman rambles anchor and does crosscut is correct does not hold if that it does not acidify is right.; sent6 -> int6: if the newswoman does not acidify and/or it does ramble perishable then it does not acidify.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the newswoman does not acidify.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the newswoman rambles anchor and does crosscut is false.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it does ramble anchor and is a kind of a crosscut does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the pakchoi does not axe journey. ; $context$ = sent1: the newswoman does not acidify and/or it rambles perishable. sent2: everything does not ramble VHF and/or rambles copperware. sent3: that everything is not gymnastic and/or it is not useful is not incorrect. sent4: the pakchoi is not wieldy and/or does axe journey. sent5: the nodule does not axe journey. sent6: if something does not acidify and/or it does ramble perishable then it does not acidify. sent7: something is non-censorial thing that does explicate if it is not hydropathic. sent8: the pakchoi is not a hybridoma or it does ramble zygotene or both. sent9: if the ictodosaur is not hydropathic the anchor is not hydropathic. sent10: that something rambles anchor and crosscuts is false if it does not acidify. sent11: the Guarnerius does not axe journey. sent12: if something does not ramble VHF or does ramble copperware or both then the fact that it does not axe journey is correct. sent13: if something is not censorial and explicates it does not axe journey. sent14: the pakchoi is not a thirst. sent15: if something does not ramble anchor the fact that it is not hydropathic or it is censorial or both is not correct. sent16: that something does explicate and does axe journey is not wrong if it is not censorial. sent17: the nipple does not axe journey. sent18: if something does not elongate it is not a diarist. sent19: if the fact that the ictodosaur is not hydropathic and/or it is censorial does not hold the pakchoi is not censorial. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the pakchoi either does not ramble VHF or does ramble copperware or both.; sent12 -> int2: if the pakchoi does not ramble VHF or rambles copperware or both the fact that it does not axe journey hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__