not the denaturing but the suborning gyrfalcon occurs.
sent1: the livery happens. sent2: if the constitution occurs and the denaturing happens then the fact that the fortune does not occur is not wrong. sent3: if the sickening diazepam occurs then the barring seaward happens. sent4: that the apery occurs is true. sent5: the fact that the incongruentness happens is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the amauroticness happens is incorrect if the fortune does not occur. sent7: the suborning gyrfalcon happens. sent8: if the incongruentness happens the fact that the downtown and the non-amauroticness happens is not correct. sent9: the improvidentness and the unconventionalness happens. sent10: both the arboricalness and the sickening operative occurs. sent11: the sickening operative causes the obligatedness. sent12: if the arboricalness does not occur that the denaturing does not occur and the suborning gyrfalcon happens does not hold. sent13: if the obligatedness occurs the constitution occurs. sent14: the recirculation happens. sent15: that the sublimation happens prevents that the sickening gopher does not occur.
sent10 -> int1: the sickening operative occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the obligating happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the constitution happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the denaturing happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the constitution and the denaturing occurs.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fortune does not occur.; sent8 & sent5 -> int6: that the downtownness and the non-amauroticness happens is not true.;
that the fact that not the denaturing but the suborning gyrfalcon occurs is false is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = not the denaturing but the suborning gyrfalcon occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the livery happens. sent2: if the constitution occurs and the denaturing happens then the fact that the fortune does not occur is not wrong. sent3: if the sickening diazepam occurs then the barring seaward happens. sent4: that the apery occurs is true. sent5: the fact that the incongruentness happens is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the amauroticness happens is incorrect if the fortune does not occur. sent7: the suborning gyrfalcon happens. sent8: if the incongruentness happens the fact that the downtown and the non-amauroticness happens is not correct. sent9: the improvidentness and the unconventionalness happens. sent10: both the arboricalness and the sickening operative occurs. sent11: the sickening operative causes the obligatedness. sent12: if the arboricalness does not occur that the denaturing does not occur and the suborning gyrfalcon happens does not hold. sent13: if the obligatedness occurs the constitution occurs. sent14: the recirculation happens. sent15: that the sublimation happens prevents that the sickening gopher does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the sickening operative occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the obligating happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the constitution happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the denaturing happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the constitution and the denaturing occurs.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fortune does not occur.; sent8 & sent5 -> int6: that the downtownness and the non-amauroticness happens is not true.; __UNKNOWN__