the sadness occurs.
sent1: the overcharge and the opened occurs. sent2: the owing does not occur. sent3: if the reorganization does not occur then the kidnapping mujtihad occurs but the nectar-richness does not occur. sent4: if the apheticness occurs then the aquaticsness happens. sent5: if the taste occurs that the perfusion does not occur and the whelping introit does not occur is not true. sent6: if that the nettling happens hold the up-bow happens. sent7: that the whelping beats does not occur is prevented by that the scalding occurs. sent8: if the up-bow happens then the fact that the sadness happens is not false. sent9: the openedness happens but the overcharging does not occur if the tolerableness happens. sent10: if the unfaithfulness occurs then the up-bow does not occur and the sadness does not occur. sent11: the fact that if the owing does not occur that that the self-preservation does not occur and the unfaithfulness happens is not true is not incorrect is not incorrect. sent12: if the wiring occurs then the tasting occurs. sent13: that the individuating myth does not occur is triggered by that the opened happens or the tolerableness happens or both. sent14: if that the self-preservation does not occur and the unfaithfulness occurs does not hold then the fact that the unfaithfulness does not occur is correct. sent15: if that the unfaithfulness happens or the owing does not occur or both is incorrect then the up-bow does not occur. sent16: that the reorganization does not occur and the skirling occurs is triggered by that the aquaticsness happens. sent17: that if that the perfusion does not occur and the whelping introit does not occur is incorrect then the self-preservation does not occur hold. sent18: the wiring happens and the boricness occurs if the nectar-richness does not occur. sent19: the feat does not occur if the fact that the overcharge happens and the opening happens does not hold. sent20: the touch happens and/or the specific occurs. sent21: if the opening but not the overcharge happens then the sadness does not occur. sent22: the tolerableness is prevented by that the individuating myth occurs but the nettle does not occur. sent23: if that the whelping beats occurs hold the apheticness happens.
sent1 -> int1: the opening happens.; int1 -> int2: the opening occurs and/or the tolerableness happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the individuating myth does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nettling does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the individuating myth does not occur and the nettle does not occur.; sent11 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the self-preservation does not occur but the unfaithfulness happens does not hold.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the unfaithfulness does not occur.;
the feat does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the sadness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the overcharge and the opened occurs. sent2: the owing does not occur. sent3: if the reorganization does not occur then the kidnapping mujtihad occurs but the nectar-richness does not occur. sent4: if the apheticness occurs then the aquaticsness happens. sent5: if the taste occurs that the perfusion does not occur and the whelping introit does not occur is not true. sent6: if that the nettling happens hold the up-bow happens. sent7: that the whelping beats does not occur is prevented by that the scalding occurs. sent8: if the up-bow happens then the fact that the sadness happens is not false. sent9: the openedness happens but the overcharging does not occur if the tolerableness happens. sent10: if the unfaithfulness occurs then the up-bow does not occur and the sadness does not occur. sent11: the fact that if the owing does not occur that that the self-preservation does not occur and the unfaithfulness happens is not true is not incorrect is not incorrect. sent12: if the wiring occurs then the tasting occurs. sent13: that the individuating myth does not occur is triggered by that the opened happens or the tolerableness happens or both. sent14: if that the self-preservation does not occur and the unfaithfulness occurs does not hold then the fact that the unfaithfulness does not occur is correct. sent15: if that the unfaithfulness happens or the owing does not occur or both is incorrect then the up-bow does not occur. sent16: that the reorganization does not occur and the skirling occurs is triggered by that the aquaticsness happens. sent17: that if that the perfusion does not occur and the whelping introit does not occur is incorrect then the self-preservation does not occur hold. sent18: the wiring happens and the boricness occurs if the nectar-richness does not occur. sent19: the feat does not occur if the fact that the overcharge happens and the opening happens does not hold. sent20: the touch happens and/or the specific occurs. sent21: if the opening but not the overcharge happens then the sadness does not occur. sent22: the tolerableness is prevented by that the individuating myth occurs but the nettle does not occur. sent23: if that the whelping beats occurs hold the apheticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the opening happens.; int1 -> int2: the opening occurs and/or the tolerableness happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the individuating myth does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nettling does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the individuating myth does not occur and the nettle does not occur.; sent11 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the self-preservation does not occur but the unfaithfulness happens does not hold.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the unfaithfulness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__