the fact that the Fang is not ascensional hold.
sent1: that if there is something such that that it is gutless and/or it is actinomycetal does not hold that the compromiser does not cohabit does not hold hold. sent2: the declension does not pity C if that it is a Almaty and it is gutless does not hold. sent3: something is not sectorial if it is not cismontane. sent4: there exists something such that it is enthusiastic. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a jam is not right. sent6: the fact that the declension pities C and/or it is humane is false if the loggerhead is not humane. sent7: the fusilier does not pity C. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not pity C is not wrong. sent9: the declension is a Almaty. sent10: if the fact that something is actinomycetal and it is gutless is false then it is not a kind of a Almaty. sent11: there is something such that that it is biotypic and/or it is a sectional is not correct. sent12: if that something is both a bacchant and a cope is incorrect then it does not swap streptocarpus. sent13: if the compromiser does not jam but it is ascensional then that the Fang is not ascensional is correct. sent14: if there is something such that it does not jam the fact that the compromiser is actinomycetal and it is gutless does not hold. sent15: if the compromiser is not a Almaty then the fact that the loggerhead is not humane is true. sent16: if the compromiser is non-actinomycetal then it is not a Almaty. sent17: that the declension does cohabit or is humane or both is false. sent18: something does pity C and/or is not inhumane. sent19: the fact that the declension is provocative and/or cohabits is incorrect. sent20: the Fang does cohabit if there exists something such that that it either pities C or is humane or both is not true. sent21: the loggerhead is not actinomycetal if the declension is not humane. sent22: something that pities abohm astringes. sent23: there is something such that the fact that it is not humane is not wrong. sent24: something is ascensional if it cohabits. sent25: there exists something such that that it is not humane and it does pity C does not hold.
sent5 & sent14 -> int1: that the compromiser is a kind of actinomycetal thing that is gutless is not correct.; sent10 -> int2: the compromiser is not a Almaty if that it is both actinomycetal and gutless does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the compromiser is not a Almaty.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the loggerhead is not humane.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that either the declension does pity C or it is humane or both does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it does pity C or it is humane or both is not true.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the Fang does cohabit.; sent24 -> int8: the Fang is ascensional if it does cohabit.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the Fang is not ascensional.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Fang is not ascensional hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that if there is something such that that it is gutless and/or it is actinomycetal does not hold that the compromiser does not cohabit does not hold hold. sent2: the declension does not pity C if that it is a Almaty and it is gutless does not hold. sent3: something is not sectorial if it is not cismontane. sent4: there exists something such that it is enthusiastic. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a jam is not right. sent6: the fact that the declension pities C and/or it is humane is false if the loggerhead is not humane. sent7: the fusilier does not pity C. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not pity C is not wrong. sent9: the declension is a Almaty. sent10: if the fact that something is actinomycetal and it is gutless is false then it is not a kind of a Almaty. sent11: there is something such that that it is biotypic and/or it is a sectional is not correct. sent12: if that something is both a bacchant and a cope is incorrect then it does not swap streptocarpus. sent13: if the compromiser does not jam but it is ascensional then that the Fang is not ascensional is correct. sent14: if there is something such that it does not jam the fact that the compromiser is actinomycetal and it is gutless does not hold. sent15: if the compromiser is not a Almaty then the fact that the loggerhead is not humane is true. sent16: if the compromiser is non-actinomycetal then it is not a Almaty. sent17: that the declension does cohabit or is humane or both is false. sent18: something does pity C and/or is not inhumane. sent19: the fact that the declension is provocative and/or cohabits is incorrect. sent20: the Fang does cohabit if there exists something such that that it either pities C or is humane or both is not true. sent21: the loggerhead is not actinomycetal if the declension is not humane. sent22: something that pities abohm astringes. sent23: there is something such that the fact that it is not humane is not wrong. sent24: something is ascensional if it cohabits. sent25: there exists something such that that it is not humane and it does pity C does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent14 -> int1: that the compromiser is a kind of actinomycetal thing that is gutless is not correct.; sent10 -> int2: the compromiser is not a Almaty if that it is both actinomycetal and gutless does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the compromiser is not a Almaty.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the loggerhead is not humane.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that either the declension does pity C or it is humane or both does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it does pity C or it is humane or both is not true.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the Fang does cohabit.; sent24 -> int8: the Fang is ascensional if it does cohabit.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__