the fact that if the skywalk is not avascular then the fact that the fettuccine does turn city and it is unregenerate is correct is not true.
sent1: that the fettuccine does turn city but it is not avascular is not correct if it is unregenerate. sent2: the fact that the skywalk is a kind of a boson and does ditch is not true. sent3: the skywalk is a narrowed if it is avascular. sent4: the foreplay does ditch and it turns city. sent5: the fact that the fettuccine is unpopular if the skywalk does ditch is not incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the skywalk is a narrowed hold that it is a kind of a boson and it does not ditch is not true. sent7: the fettuccine is unpopular if that the skywalk is a boson but not a ditch is not true. sent8: if something is not avascular then that it does lamb foreplay and it is not intramolecular is false. sent9: if the skywalk is avascular then the fettuccine does turn city and it is unregenerate. sent10: the dendrite is not avascular if there is something such that the fact that it is a boson and it is avascular is not true. sent11: the fettuccine is unregenerate and it is a utricle. sent12: the fettuccine is a utricle. sent13: the skywalk is unpopular. sent14: if the skywalk is a narrowed then that it is a boson that is a kind of a ditch is incorrect. sent15: the fact that something is a boson and avascular does not hold if it does not narrow. sent16: that the fettuccine is unpopular but it is not a ditch does not hold if there exists something such that it does ditch. sent17: the fettuccine turns city if it is unpopular. sent18: the skywalk is narrowed if it is non-avascular. sent19: that the skywalk is a shouldered and is not unpopular does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the skywalk is not avascular is not incorrect.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the skywalk is a kind of a narrowed.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the skywalk is a kind of a boson that is not a ditch does not hold.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fettuccine is unpopular.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fettuccine does turn city.; sent11 -> int5: the fettuccine is unregenerate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fettuccine turns city and is unregenerate.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dendrite does lamb foreplay but it is not intramolecular is wrong.
sent8 -> int7: if the dendrite is not avascular that it lambs foreplay and it is not intramolecular does not hold.; sent15 -> int8: if the skywalk is not narrowed the fact that it is a boson and avascular is not right.; sent4 -> int9: the foreplay is a ditch.; int9 -> int10: something does ditch.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the fact that the fettuccine is both unpopular and not a ditch is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the skywalk is not avascular then the fact that the fettuccine does turn city and it is unregenerate is correct is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fettuccine does turn city but it is not avascular is not correct if it is unregenerate. sent2: the fact that the skywalk is a kind of a boson and does ditch is not true. sent3: the skywalk is a narrowed if it is avascular. sent4: the foreplay does ditch and it turns city. sent5: the fact that the fettuccine is unpopular if the skywalk does ditch is not incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the skywalk is a narrowed hold that it is a kind of a boson and it does not ditch is not true. sent7: the fettuccine is unpopular if that the skywalk is a boson but not a ditch is not true. sent8: if something is not avascular then that it does lamb foreplay and it is not intramolecular is false. sent9: if the skywalk is avascular then the fettuccine does turn city and it is unregenerate. sent10: the dendrite is not avascular if there is something such that the fact that it is a boson and it is avascular is not true. sent11: the fettuccine is unregenerate and it is a utricle. sent12: the fettuccine is a utricle. sent13: the skywalk is unpopular. sent14: if the skywalk is a narrowed then that it is a boson that is a kind of a ditch is incorrect. sent15: the fact that something is a boson and avascular does not hold if it does not narrow. sent16: that the fettuccine is unpopular but it is not a ditch does not hold if there exists something such that it does ditch. sent17: the fettuccine turns city if it is unpopular. sent18: the skywalk is narrowed if it is non-avascular. sent19: that the skywalk is a shouldered and is not unpopular does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the skywalk is not avascular is not incorrect.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the skywalk is a kind of a narrowed.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the skywalk is a kind of a boson that is not a ditch does not hold.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fettuccine is unpopular.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fettuccine does turn city.; sent11 -> int5: the fettuccine is unregenerate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fettuccine turns city and is unregenerate.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__