the fact that if the gaze occurs then the undiplomaticness does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the undiplomaticness occurs. sent2: the non-Nazareneness leads to that the conjugation does not occur but the acropetalness occurs. sent3: that the undiplomaticness does not occur is triggered by that both the yielding and the gaze occurs. sent4: if the chapter does not occur the backup does not occur and the explanation occurs. sent5: if the tipping Masai does not occur then that both the smallness and the occipitalness occurs does not hold. sent6: that the tipping jesting does not occur results in that the flaking Tarbell occurs and the echolocation occurs. sent7: the Celticness does not occur. sent8: the yield happens if not the Celtic but the tipping Ibert occurs. sent9: the occipitalness does not occur if the fact that the smallness and the occipitalness happens does not hold. sent10: the gaze prevents the non-undiplomaticness. sent11: the tipping jesting does not occur if the occipitalness does not occur. sent12: if the echolocation happens the undiplomaticness does not occur and the grunting does not occur. sent13: the chapter occurs and the tipping Ibert happens. sent14: the nonexplosiveness does not occur. sent15: the gazing does not occur if the undiplomaticness does not occur and the grunt does not occur. sent16: that not the conjugation but the acropetalness happens yields that the tipping Masai does not occur. sent17: the undiplomaticness happens if the yielding and the gazing occurs. sent18: that the chapter occurs is not incorrect.
sent13 -> int1: the tipping Ibert happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the Celticness does not occur and the tipping Ibert occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the yielding happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gazing happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the yielding and the gaze happens.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the undiplomaticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
not the backup but the explanation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the gaze occurs then the undiplomaticness does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the undiplomaticness occurs. sent2: the non-Nazareneness leads to that the conjugation does not occur but the acropetalness occurs. sent3: that the undiplomaticness does not occur is triggered by that both the yielding and the gaze occurs. sent4: if the chapter does not occur the backup does not occur and the explanation occurs. sent5: if the tipping Masai does not occur then that both the smallness and the occipitalness occurs does not hold. sent6: that the tipping jesting does not occur results in that the flaking Tarbell occurs and the echolocation occurs. sent7: the Celticness does not occur. sent8: the yield happens if not the Celtic but the tipping Ibert occurs. sent9: the occipitalness does not occur if the fact that the smallness and the occipitalness happens does not hold. sent10: the gaze prevents the non-undiplomaticness. sent11: the tipping jesting does not occur if the occipitalness does not occur. sent12: if the echolocation happens the undiplomaticness does not occur and the grunting does not occur. sent13: the chapter occurs and the tipping Ibert happens. sent14: the nonexplosiveness does not occur. sent15: the gazing does not occur if the undiplomaticness does not occur and the grunt does not occur. sent16: that not the conjugation but the acropetalness happens yields that the tipping Masai does not occur. sent17: the undiplomaticness happens if the yielding and the gazing occurs. sent18: that the chapter occurs is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the tipping Ibert happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the Celticness does not occur and the tipping Ibert occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the yielding happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gazing happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the yielding and the gaze happens.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the undiplomaticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__