the peephole does not stage peephole.
sent1: the Angolese is irreversible. sent2: the toadflax does lather petrolatum and is a czarina. sent3: that if the Angolese is not cardiovascular the pass lathers petrolatum and it is cardiovascular is not false. sent4: if the fact that something eviscerates pass and lathers petrolatum does not hold it is not adynamic. sent5: something does not stage peephole if that it stage peephole and it is not postbiblical is incorrect. sent6: the pass is cardiovascular. sent7: the fact that the coachbuilder is cardiovascular hold. sent8: if the Angolese is cardiovascular and it stages peephole then the peephole does not stages peephole. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is rhombic a halloo does not hold. sent10: the peephole is cardiovascular. sent11: the fact that something is a Sinitic and does lather Squalidae if that it is not cryogenic is right is true. sent12: the coachbuilder is adynamic if the Angolese is postbiblical. sent13: that something eviscerates pass and it lathers petrolatum does not hold if it is not a czarina. sent14: if something is not adynamic it is a kind of a fistfight and it is cardiovascular. sent15: either the Angolese is postbiblical or it does not fistfight or both. sent16: the toadflax is abstemious. sent17: the Angolese is not postbiblical and/or it fistfights. sent18: that that something stages peephole and is not postbiblical is not right if it does fistfight is not false. sent19: the peephole is not a czarina if the Angolese is a kind of a Sinitic and lathers Squalidae. sent20: the toadflax eviscerates pass and it is Sinitic. sent21: the pass does not lather petrolatum if the toadflax eviscerates pass and lather petrolatum. sent22: the Angolese is not cardiovascular if it is not postbiblical and/or it does not fistfight. sent23: if the Angolese is not cardiovascular then the pass is cardiovascular. sent24: the peephole does stage peephole if the coachbuilder is adynamic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Angolese is not postbiblical.; assump1 -> int1: the Angolese is non-postbiblical and/or it is not a fistfight.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the Angolese is non-cardiovascular.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the pass does lather petrolatum and is cardiovascular.; int3 -> int4: the pass does lather petrolatum.; sent20 -> int5: the toadflax eviscerates pass.; sent2 -> int6: the fact that the toadflax lathers petrolatum is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the toadflax does eviscerate pass and does lather petrolatum.; sent21 & int7 -> int8: the pass does not lather petrolatum.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the Angolese is postbiblical.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the coachbuilder is adynamic.; int11 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the peephole does not stage peephole.
sent5 -> int12: the peephole does not stage peephole if the fact that it stage peephole and is not postbiblical is wrong.; sent18 -> int13: if the fact that the peephole is a kind of a fistfight is correct then the fact that it stages peephole and is not postbiblical is not true.; sent14 -> int14: if the peephole is not adynamic then it is a fistfight and is cardiovascular.; sent4 -> int15: if that the peephole does eviscerate pass and lathers petrolatum does not hold it is not adynamic.; sent13 -> int16: if the peephole is not a kind of a czarina then the fact that it does eviscerate pass and it lathers petrolatum is incorrect.; sent11 -> int17: if the Angolese is not cryogenic then it is a Sinitic and does lather Squalidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the peephole does not stage peephole. ; $context$ = sent1: the Angolese is irreversible. sent2: the toadflax does lather petrolatum and is a czarina. sent3: that if the Angolese is not cardiovascular the pass lathers petrolatum and it is cardiovascular is not false. sent4: if the fact that something eviscerates pass and lathers petrolatum does not hold it is not adynamic. sent5: something does not stage peephole if that it stage peephole and it is not postbiblical is incorrect. sent6: the pass is cardiovascular. sent7: the fact that the coachbuilder is cardiovascular hold. sent8: if the Angolese is cardiovascular and it stages peephole then the peephole does not stages peephole. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is rhombic a halloo does not hold. sent10: the peephole is cardiovascular. sent11: the fact that something is a Sinitic and does lather Squalidae if that it is not cryogenic is right is true. sent12: the coachbuilder is adynamic if the Angolese is postbiblical. sent13: that something eviscerates pass and it lathers petrolatum does not hold if it is not a czarina. sent14: if something is not adynamic it is a kind of a fistfight and it is cardiovascular. sent15: either the Angolese is postbiblical or it does not fistfight or both. sent16: the toadflax is abstemious. sent17: the Angolese is not postbiblical and/or it fistfights. sent18: that that something stages peephole and is not postbiblical is not right if it does fistfight is not false. sent19: the peephole is not a czarina if the Angolese is a kind of a Sinitic and lathers Squalidae. sent20: the toadflax eviscerates pass and it is Sinitic. sent21: the pass does not lather petrolatum if the toadflax eviscerates pass and lather petrolatum. sent22: the Angolese is not cardiovascular if it is not postbiblical and/or it does not fistfight. sent23: if the Angolese is not cardiovascular then the pass is cardiovascular. sent24: the peephole does stage peephole if the coachbuilder is adynamic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Angolese is not postbiblical.; assump1 -> int1: the Angolese is non-postbiblical and/or it is not a fistfight.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the Angolese is non-cardiovascular.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the pass does lather petrolatum and is cardiovascular.; int3 -> int4: the pass does lather petrolatum.; sent20 -> int5: the toadflax eviscerates pass.; sent2 -> int6: the fact that the toadflax lathers petrolatum is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the toadflax does eviscerate pass and does lather petrolatum.; sent21 & int7 -> int8: the pass does not lather petrolatum.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the Angolese is postbiblical.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the coachbuilder is adynamic.; int11 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__