the discountenancing Carpobrotus occurs.
sent1: that not the finning but the aweing Kalamazoo occurs prevents that the uncommonness occurs. sent2: that the uncommonness happens is right if the theoreticalness does not occur and the manhandling craton does not occur. sent3: the discountenancing chyme does not occur. sent4: if both the non-theoreticalness and the manhandling craton happens then the fact that the uncommonness happens is not incorrect. sent5: if the fact that the theoreticalness does not occur and the manhandling craton does not occur is not correct then the aweing Kalamazoo occurs. sent6: that the discountenancing Carpobrotus happens is brought about by that the fin happens. sent7: the uncommonness does not occur if the fact that the aweing Kalamazoo does not occur and the fin does not occur is false. sent8: that the onness does not occur yields that the chemical happens but the yield does not occur. sent9: if the deformation does not occur then not the discountenancing chyme but the manhandling Hershey happens. sent10: that both the discountenancing chyme and the deformation happens does not hold if the yielding does not occur. sent11: if the aweing Kalamazoo occurs then the finning happens. sent12: the fact that the theoreticalness happens but the manhandling craton does not occur does not hold. sent13: that not the officiation but the manhandling Hershey occurs is right if the discountenancing chyme does not occur. sent14: that the aweing Kalamazoo does not occur and the fin does not occur is not right if the manhandling Hershey does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the theoreticalness does not occur and the manhandling craton does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the uncommonness occurs.; sent13 & sent3 -> int2: not the officiation but the manhandling Hershey occurs.; int2 -> int3: the officiation does not occur.;
the discountenancing Carpobrotus does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the discountenancing Carpobrotus occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the finning but the aweing Kalamazoo occurs prevents that the uncommonness occurs. sent2: that the uncommonness happens is right if the theoreticalness does not occur and the manhandling craton does not occur. sent3: the discountenancing chyme does not occur. sent4: if both the non-theoreticalness and the manhandling craton happens then the fact that the uncommonness happens is not incorrect. sent5: if the fact that the theoreticalness does not occur and the manhandling craton does not occur is not correct then the aweing Kalamazoo occurs. sent6: that the discountenancing Carpobrotus happens is brought about by that the fin happens. sent7: the uncommonness does not occur if the fact that the aweing Kalamazoo does not occur and the fin does not occur is false. sent8: that the onness does not occur yields that the chemical happens but the yield does not occur. sent9: if the deformation does not occur then not the discountenancing chyme but the manhandling Hershey happens. sent10: that both the discountenancing chyme and the deformation happens does not hold if the yielding does not occur. sent11: if the aweing Kalamazoo occurs then the finning happens. sent12: the fact that the theoreticalness happens but the manhandling craton does not occur does not hold. sent13: that not the officiation but the manhandling Hershey occurs is right if the discountenancing chyme does not occur. sent14: that the aweing Kalamazoo does not occur and the fin does not occur is not right if the manhandling Hershey does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the theoreticalness does not occur and the manhandling craton does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the uncommonness occurs.; sent13 & sent3 -> int2: not the officiation but the manhandling Hershey occurs.; int2 -> int3: the officiation does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__