that the church does not stag is not incorrect.
sent1: the complex is a hoist and is a kind of a Lincolnshire. sent2: if the church does not eliminate Abadan it is not unprotective. sent3: the church is hexangular. sent4: if the oscilloscope is not fractional then that the church does not stag and is lexicostatistic does not hold. sent5: if the chambray does not unmake borated it does not eliminate complex. sent6: something does not eliminate Abadan if it is fractional and is a stag. sent7: the complex is lexicostatistic if the church hoists. sent8: something is a cork if the fact that it does downsize hold. sent9: the church is unprotective if the complex is a Lincolnshire. sent10: the church is lexicostatistic if that it is hexangular is not incorrect. sent11: something is fractional if that it is lexicostatistic hold. sent12: the church is not a Lincolnshire.
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the church is lexicostatistic.; sent11 -> int2: that the church is fractional is not incorrect if it is lexicostatistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the church is fractional.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the church is a stag.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the church is both not non-fractional and a stag.; sent6 -> int5: the church does not eliminate Abadan if it is fractional thing that is a kind of a stag.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the church does not eliminate Abadan.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the church is not unprotective.; sent1 -> int8: the complex is a Lincolnshire.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the church is unprotective.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the complex is unprotective.
$hypothesis$ = that the church does not stag is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the complex is a hoist and is a kind of a Lincolnshire. sent2: if the church does not eliminate Abadan it is not unprotective. sent3: the church is hexangular. sent4: if the oscilloscope is not fractional then that the church does not stag and is lexicostatistic does not hold. sent5: if the chambray does not unmake borated it does not eliminate complex. sent6: something does not eliminate Abadan if it is fractional and is a stag. sent7: the complex is lexicostatistic if the church hoists. sent8: something is a cork if the fact that it does downsize hold. sent9: the church is unprotective if the complex is a Lincolnshire. sent10: the church is lexicostatistic if that it is hexangular is not incorrect. sent11: something is fractional if that it is lexicostatistic hold. sent12: the church is not a Lincolnshire. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the church is lexicostatistic.; sent11 -> int2: that the church is fractional is not incorrect if it is lexicostatistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the church is fractional.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the church is a stag.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the church is both not non-fractional and a stag.; sent6 -> int5: the church does not eliminate Abadan if it is fractional thing that is a kind of a stag.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the church does not eliminate Abadan.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the church is not unprotective.; sent1 -> int8: the complex is a Lincolnshire.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the church is unprotective.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__