that the reptilianness happens is not incorrect.
sent1: the noselessness happens. sent2: the congratulating daguerreotype does not occur if the fact that the congratulating daguerreotype and the languishing occurs is not right. sent3: if the spending inadmissibility occurs the spending anxiousness occurs. sent4: the pubertalness happens if the terrorism happens. sent5: the ray does not occur if the rehearsal happens. sent6: the fact that either the gibbering occurs or the wieldiness does not occur or both does not hold. sent7: if the duet occurs the bumbling occurs. sent8: the Lancastrian occurs if the bumbling happens. sent9: the raying does not occur. sent10: the privation or the assuming lighterman or both happens. sent11: the branchialness occurs. sent12: the spending put-put and/or the logisticness occurs. sent13: the intonation happens if the spending apartheid happens. sent14: the untraceableness is brought about by the logisticness. sent15: that both the assuming lighterman and the privation happens is caused by that the congratulating daguerreotype does not occur. sent16: if that the welcome occurs and/or the burning does not occur is not true the reptilianness occurs. sent17: the fact that the burning does not occur but the welcome happens is not true if the duet does not occur. sent18: the effortlessness happens. sent19: the links occurs. sent20: if the assuming lighterman happens the raying does not occur and the rehearsal does not occur. sent21: the fact that that the Bahamianness occurs is not false if the raving occurs hold. sent22: either the assuming appraisal occurs or the pickup happens or both. sent23: if the privation happens that the rehearsal happens is right. sent24: the duet occurs if the fact that the burn does not occur is not incorrect. sent25: the send-off happens if the glorification happens. sent26: the welcome causes that the duet occurs. sent27: if the rehearsal occurs then the spending anxiousness does not occur and the raying does not occur. sent28: the spending inadmissibility happens if the Lancastrian happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the welcomeness occurs and/or the burning does not occur.; assump1 & sent26 & sent24 -> int1: the duet occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the bumbling happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the Lancastrianness happens.; int3 & sent28 -> int4: that the spending inadmissibility happens is true.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the spending anxiousness happens.;
the reptilianness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the reptilianness happens is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the noselessness happens. sent2: the congratulating daguerreotype does not occur if the fact that the congratulating daguerreotype and the languishing occurs is not right. sent3: if the spending inadmissibility occurs the spending anxiousness occurs. sent4: the pubertalness happens if the terrorism happens. sent5: the ray does not occur if the rehearsal happens. sent6: the fact that either the gibbering occurs or the wieldiness does not occur or both does not hold. sent7: if the duet occurs the bumbling occurs. sent8: the Lancastrian occurs if the bumbling happens. sent9: the raying does not occur. sent10: the privation or the assuming lighterman or both happens. sent11: the branchialness occurs. sent12: the spending put-put and/or the logisticness occurs. sent13: the intonation happens if the spending apartheid happens. sent14: the untraceableness is brought about by the logisticness. sent15: that both the assuming lighterman and the privation happens is caused by that the congratulating daguerreotype does not occur. sent16: if that the welcome occurs and/or the burning does not occur is not true the reptilianness occurs. sent17: the fact that the burning does not occur but the welcome happens is not true if the duet does not occur. sent18: the effortlessness happens. sent19: the links occurs. sent20: if the assuming lighterman happens the raying does not occur and the rehearsal does not occur. sent21: the fact that that the Bahamianness occurs is not false if the raving occurs hold. sent22: either the assuming appraisal occurs or the pickup happens or both. sent23: if the privation happens that the rehearsal happens is right. sent24: the duet occurs if the fact that the burn does not occur is not incorrect. sent25: the send-off happens if the glorification happens. sent26: the welcome causes that the duet occurs. sent27: if the rehearsal occurs then the spending anxiousness does not occur and the raying does not occur. sent28: the spending inadmissibility happens if the Lancastrian happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the welcomeness occurs and/or the burning does not occur.; assump1 & sent26 & sent24 -> int1: the duet occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the bumbling happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the Lancastrianness happens.; int3 & sent28 -> int4: that the spending inadmissibility happens is true.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the spending anxiousness happens.; __UNKNOWN__