that the fact that the neurotropicness occurs and the exacerbating defoliation occurs is not correct is true.
sent1: the windage happens. sent2: that the bridalness and the non-irreducibleness happens is false. sent3: the draining squatter occurs if that the fact that the bridalness and the non-irreducibleness happens is true is false. sent4: that the dehumanization occurs is brought about by the fishing. sent5: the exacerbating meshed does not occur if the fact that the overwhelming persona does not occur but the discarding Condorcet occurs is not correct. sent6: if the increase occurs the rebuffing occurs. sent7: if the Hellenicness does not occur then the discarding audience but not the nonfatness occurs. sent8: the fact that both the bridal and the irreducibleness happens does not hold. sent9: the fact that the neurotropicness occurs and the exacerbating defoliation happens does not hold if the fact that the draining squatter does not occur hold. sent10: the discarding Moron happens. sent11: the neurotropicness occurs if the draining squatter occurs. sent12: if the exacerbating meshed does not occur then that both the expounding and the favor occurs does not hold. sent13: the favor happens. sent14: the draining lutefisk occurs. sent15: the draining squatter happens if the irreducibleness happens. sent16: if the nonfatness does not occur then that not the overwhelming persona but the discarding Condorcet happens is incorrect. sent17: if that the rebuff happens and the culdoscopy does not occur is incorrect the fact that the feminist occurs is not wrong. sent18: the expounding prevents that the exacerbating defoliation does not occur. sent19: the expounding and the favor happens.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: that the draining squatter occurs is not false.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the neurotropicness occurs.; sent19 -> int3: the expounding occurs.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the exacerbating defoliation occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that both the neurotropicness and the exacerbating defoliation happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the neurotropicness occurs and the exacerbating defoliation occurs is not correct is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the windage happens. sent2: that the bridalness and the non-irreducibleness happens is false. sent3: the draining squatter occurs if that the fact that the bridalness and the non-irreducibleness happens is true is false. sent4: that the dehumanization occurs is brought about by the fishing. sent5: the exacerbating meshed does not occur if the fact that the overwhelming persona does not occur but the discarding Condorcet occurs is not correct. sent6: if the increase occurs the rebuffing occurs. sent7: if the Hellenicness does not occur then the discarding audience but not the nonfatness occurs. sent8: the fact that both the bridal and the irreducibleness happens does not hold. sent9: the fact that the neurotropicness occurs and the exacerbating defoliation happens does not hold if the fact that the draining squatter does not occur hold. sent10: the discarding Moron happens. sent11: the neurotropicness occurs if the draining squatter occurs. sent12: if the exacerbating meshed does not occur then that both the expounding and the favor occurs does not hold. sent13: the favor happens. sent14: the draining lutefisk occurs. sent15: the draining squatter happens if the irreducibleness happens. sent16: if the nonfatness does not occur then that not the overwhelming persona but the discarding Condorcet happens is incorrect. sent17: if that the rebuff happens and the culdoscopy does not occur is incorrect the fact that the feminist occurs is not wrong. sent18: the expounding prevents that the exacerbating defoliation does not occur. sent19: the expounding and the favor happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: that the draining squatter occurs is not false.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the neurotropicness occurs.; sent19 -> int3: the expounding occurs.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the exacerbating defoliation occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__