the schistosome is Himalayan.
sent1: if something vitriols Lysimachus then it is Himalayan. sent2: that the track is not nonfinancial but it is a scleredema is wrong. sent3: that the schistosome does not vitriol Lysimachus and is unselfish is wrong if the track is non-phylogenetic. sent4: the track is not phylogenetic if it is a scleredema. sent5: the track is nonfinancial. sent6: the track is not a scleredema. sent7: that the track does not vitriol Lysimachus and is monumental does not hold. sent8: the fact that the schistosome vitriols Lysimachus and it is unselfish does not hold. sent9: the schistosome is not nonfinancial. sent10: if the fact that something is not nonfinancial and it is not a kind of a scleredema is not true it is not phylogenetic. sent11: if that something is a kind of non-inconsiderate thing that is not ametabolic is wrong then it is not a kind of a Vayu. sent12: the schistosome is Himalayan if it vitriols Lysimachus. sent13: the cattleman is not Himalayan. sent14: if that something is a kind of non-athletics thing that does not vitriol fetter is not true then it does not traffic Kandy. sent15: the schistosome is not phylogenetic if the fact that it is not unselfish and does not vitriol Lysimachus is wrong. sent16: something that is a scleredema is not phylogenetic. sent17: if that something does not vitriol Lysimachus and is unselfish does not hold it is Himalayan. sent18: the fact that the schistosome does vitriol Lysimachus and is unselfish is false if the track is not phylogenetic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the track is a kind of non-nonfinancial thing that is not a scleredema.; assump1 -> int1: the track is not nonfinancial.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the track is not nonfinancial and it is not a scleredema is incorrect.; sent10 -> int4: if the fact that the track is not nonfinancial and is not a scleredema is false then it is not phylogenetic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the track is not phylogenetic.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the schistosome does not vitriol Lysimachus but it is unselfish is not correct.; sent17 -> int7: if the fact that the schistosome does not vitriol Lysimachus but it is unselfish is not true then that it is Himalayan is not incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the schistosome is Himalayan. ; $context$ = sent1: if something vitriols Lysimachus then it is Himalayan. sent2: that the track is not nonfinancial but it is a scleredema is wrong. sent3: that the schistosome does not vitriol Lysimachus and is unselfish is wrong if the track is non-phylogenetic. sent4: the track is not phylogenetic if it is a scleredema. sent5: the track is nonfinancial. sent6: the track is not a scleredema. sent7: that the track does not vitriol Lysimachus and is monumental does not hold. sent8: the fact that the schistosome vitriols Lysimachus and it is unselfish does not hold. sent9: the schistosome is not nonfinancial. sent10: if the fact that something is not nonfinancial and it is not a kind of a scleredema is not true it is not phylogenetic. sent11: if that something is a kind of non-inconsiderate thing that is not ametabolic is wrong then it is not a kind of a Vayu. sent12: the schistosome is Himalayan if it vitriols Lysimachus. sent13: the cattleman is not Himalayan. sent14: if that something is a kind of non-athletics thing that does not vitriol fetter is not true then it does not traffic Kandy. sent15: the schistosome is not phylogenetic if the fact that it is not unselfish and does not vitriol Lysimachus is wrong. sent16: something that is a scleredema is not phylogenetic. sent17: if that something does not vitriol Lysimachus and is unselfish does not hold it is Himalayan. sent18: the fact that the schistosome does vitriol Lysimachus and is unselfish is false if the track is not phylogenetic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the track is a kind of non-nonfinancial thing that is not a scleredema.; assump1 -> int1: the track is not nonfinancial.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the track is not nonfinancial and it is not a scleredema is incorrect.; sent10 -> int4: if the fact that the track is not nonfinancial and is not a scleredema is false then it is not phylogenetic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the track is not phylogenetic.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the schistosome does not vitriol Lysimachus but it is unselfish is not correct.; sent17 -> int7: if the fact that the schistosome does not vitriol Lysimachus but it is unselfish is not true then that it is Himalayan is not incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__