that both the refractiveness and the econometricsness occurs if that the ferreting skincare does not occur is not incorrect is false.
sent1: that the predetermination does not occur and the symbolizing does not occur does not hold. sent2: the bioclimaticness occurs. sent3: the fact that the bregmaticness does not occur is wrong. sent4: that the econometricsness does not occur and the baiting does not occur is not right. sent5: both the Arameanness and the ferreting incumbency happens if the bregmaticness does not occur. sent6: that the non-bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare happens brings about the refractiveness. sent7: that the fact that both the bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare happens does not hold is not wrong. sent8: the fact that that the econometricsness happens and the baiting does not occur does not hold is not incorrect. sent9: if that the econometricsness does not occur and the baiting does not occur is not true the econometricsness happens. sent10: the ferreting incumbency occurs. sent11: the refractiveness happens if that the fact that the non-bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare occurs is not wrong is false. sent12: the pyrographicness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the non-bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the ferreting skincare happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ferreting skincare does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the non-bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare occurs is wrong.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the refractiveness occurs.; sent9 & sent4 -> int5: the econometricsness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the refractiveness happens and the econometricsness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the Arameanness happens and the ferreting incumbency occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that both the refractiveness and the econometricsness occurs if that the ferreting skincare does not occur is not incorrect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the predetermination does not occur and the symbolizing does not occur does not hold. sent2: the bioclimaticness occurs. sent3: the fact that the bregmaticness does not occur is wrong. sent4: that the econometricsness does not occur and the baiting does not occur is not right. sent5: both the Arameanness and the ferreting incumbency happens if the bregmaticness does not occur. sent6: that the non-bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare happens brings about the refractiveness. sent7: that the fact that both the bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare happens does not hold is not wrong. sent8: the fact that that the econometricsness happens and the baiting does not occur does not hold is not incorrect. sent9: if that the econometricsness does not occur and the baiting does not occur is not true the econometricsness happens. sent10: the ferreting incumbency occurs. sent11: the refractiveness happens if that the fact that the non-bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare occurs is not wrong is false. sent12: the pyrographicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the non-bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the ferreting skincare happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ferreting skincare does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the non-bregmaticness and the ferreting skincare occurs is wrong.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the refractiveness occurs.; sent9 & sent4 -> int5: the econometricsness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the refractiveness happens and the econometricsness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__