that if the volcanicness happens then the admiralty does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: that the enormity does not occur is prevented by the non-volcanicness or that the admiralty does not occur or both. sent2: the owning does not occur. sent3: if the Crucifixion does not occur then not the owning but the mutativeness happens. sent4: the mutativeness does not occur. sent5: that the volcanicness occurs and the admiralty occurs prevents the stoic. sent6: that the mutativeness does not occur triggers that the embowering musician occurs but the owning does not occur. sent7: if the mutativeness does not occur the fact that the owning does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: if the coursing occurs then the stewardship does not occur. sent9: the volcanicness causes that the admiralty happens. sent10: the Churchillianness and the dogfighting occurs. sent11: the fact that the embowering musician does not occur hold if the stoic does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the volcanicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the admiralty occurs is true.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: both the volcanicness and the admiralty happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the stoicness does not occur.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the embowering musician does not occur.; sent6 & sent4 -> int4: the embowering musician happens but the owning does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the embowering musician occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the admiralty does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the enormity happens is not false.
$hypothesis$ = that if the volcanicness happens then the admiralty does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the enormity does not occur is prevented by the non-volcanicness or that the admiralty does not occur or both. sent2: the owning does not occur. sent3: if the Crucifixion does not occur then not the owning but the mutativeness happens. sent4: the mutativeness does not occur. sent5: that the volcanicness occurs and the admiralty occurs prevents the stoic. sent6: that the mutativeness does not occur triggers that the embowering musician occurs but the owning does not occur. sent7: if the mutativeness does not occur the fact that the owning does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: if the coursing occurs then the stewardship does not occur. sent9: the volcanicness causes that the admiralty happens. sent10: the Churchillianness and the dogfighting occurs. sent11: the fact that the embowering musician does not occur hold if the stoic does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the volcanicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the admiralty occurs is true.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: both the volcanicness and the admiralty happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the stoicness does not occur.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the embowering musician does not occur.; sent6 & sent4 -> int4: the embowering musician happens but the owning does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the embowering musician occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the admiralty does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__