the profiterole is not electrostatics.
sent1: something does not stoke sax if it is not a bantam. sent2: if something is not millennial that it does not stumble heterozygote and it does cap is not right. sent3: if that the webworm is electrostatics hold the profiterole is electrostatics. sent4: the webworm is licit or it does stoke gabbro or both if the basketweaver is not a sousaphone. sent5: if that something does not stumble heterozygote but it is a kind of a capped is not right it does stumble heterozygote. sent6: the fact that something is not unproductive but it is a bantam is wrong if it does not stumble webworm. sent7: if the profiterole is not a royalism it is not a kind of a angelus. sent8: something does not stumble webworm if that it is not prolusory and it is not an anesthesiologist is false. sent9: that the webworm is not a angelus and it does not count depredation is right. sent10: if the rubbing is not Melanesian and it is not a lifesaver then the fact that the archdeaconry is not millennial is not incorrect. sent11: if the webworm is not a angelus and counts depredation then the profiterole does not stoke gabbro. sent12: if something does not stoke gabbro then it is not electrostatics. sent13: something is electrostatics if it is licit. sent14: the webworm does not count depredation. sent15: if the webworm is not a kind of a angelus and it does not count depredation the profiterole does not stoke gabbro. sent16: there is something such that it is not disobedient. sent17: if there is something such that it is an anesthesiologist the fact that the basketweaver is not prolusory and it is not an anesthesiologist is incorrect. sent18: the rubbing is not Melanesian and is not a lifesaver if there exists something such that it is obedient. sent19: the webworm is not electrostatics if it is not a angelus. sent20: if that something is not unproductive but a bantam is false then it is not a sousaphone. sent21: the bluepoint is an anesthesiologist if that the archdeaconry stumbles heterozygote is true.
sent15 & sent9 -> int1: the profiterole does not stoke gabbro.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the profiterole is not electrostatics is not incorrect if the fact that it does not stoke gabbro is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the profiterole is electrostatics.
sent20 -> int3: the basketweaver is not a sousaphone if the fact that it is both productive and a bantam does not hold.; sent6 -> int4: the fact that the basketweaver is not unproductive but it is a bantam does not hold if it does not stumble webworm.; sent8 -> int5: if that the basketweaver is not prolusory and it is not an anesthesiologist is not true it does not stumble webworm.; sent5 -> int6: the archdeaconry stumbles heterozygote if the fact that it does not stumbles heterozygote and it caps is wrong.; sent2 -> int7: the fact that the archdeaconry does not stumble heterozygote and is a capped is not correct if it is not millennial.; sent16 & sent18 -> int8: the rubbing is not Melanesian and it is not a lifesaver.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: that the archdeaconry is not millennial is true.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the archdeaconry does not stumble heterozygote but it is a kind of a capped is incorrect.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the archdeaconry does stumble heterozygote.; sent21 & int11 -> int12: the bluepoint is an anesthesiologist.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is an anesthesiologist is true.; int13 & sent17 -> int14: the fact that the basketweaver is non-prolusory thing that is not a kind of an anesthesiologist is not right.; int5 & int14 -> int15: the basketweaver does not stumble webworm.; int4 & int15 -> int16: that the basketweaver is not unproductive but it is a kind of a bantam is wrong.; int3 & int16 -> int17: the basketweaver is not a sousaphone.; sent4 & int17 -> int18: the webworm is not illicit and/or it stokes gabbro.; sent13 -> int19: the webworm is electrostatics if it is licit.;
$hypothesis$ = the profiterole is not electrostatics. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not stoke sax if it is not a bantam. sent2: if something is not millennial that it does not stumble heterozygote and it does cap is not right. sent3: if that the webworm is electrostatics hold the profiterole is electrostatics. sent4: the webworm is licit or it does stoke gabbro or both if the basketweaver is not a sousaphone. sent5: if that something does not stumble heterozygote but it is a kind of a capped is not right it does stumble heterozygote. sent6: the fact that something is not unproductive but it is a bantam is wrong if it does not stumble webworm. sent7: if the profiterole is not a royalism it is not a kind of a angelus. sent8: something does not stumble webworm if that it is not prolusory and it is not an anesthesiologist is false. sent9: that the webworm is not a angelus and it does not count depredation is right. sent10: if the rubbing is not Melanesian and it is not a lifesaver then the fact that the archdeaconry is not millennial is not incorrect. sent11: if the webworm is not a angelus and counts depredation then the profiterole does not stoke gabbro. sent12: if something does not stoke gabbro then it is not electrostatics. sent13: something is electrostatics if it is licit. sent14: the webworm does not count depredation. sent15: if the webworm is not a kind of a angelus and it does not count depredation the profiterole does not stoke gabbro. sent16: there is something such that it is not disobedient. sent17: if there is something such that it is an anesthesiologist the fact that the basketweaver is not prolusory and it is not an anesthesiologist is incorrect. sent18: the rubbing is not Melanesian and is not a lifesaver if there exists something such that it is obedient. sent19: the webworm is not electrostatics if it is not a angelus. sent20: if that something is not unproductive but a bantam is false then it is not a sousaphone. sent21: the bluepoint is an anesthesiologist if that the archdeaconry stumbles heterozygote is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent9 -> int1: the profiterole does not stoke gabbro.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the profiterole is not electrostatics is not incorrect if the fact that it does not stoke gabbro is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__