the equatorial does not drone soffit.
sent1: if the Mecca does not drone jawed that the equatorial does not drone jawed and it does not extinguish equatorial is not correct. sent2: if the fact that something does not drone jawed and does not extinguish equatorial is not correct the fact that it does not drone soffit hold. sent3: the ascent does not extinguish Ceratodontidae and it is not a Aristotelian. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Aristotelian that is a kind of a impermissibility then the propagation does not drone Riverside. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a wish. sent6: the ascent is not a sensitivity and does not extinguish Ceratodontidae. sent7: if something does extinguish equatorial then it does not drone soffit. sent8: if the soffit is not a fusil the roadhog is not a Aristotelian and is a impermissibility. sent9: if the ascent is not a fusil the equatorial drones soffit and is a impermissibility. sent10: that the soffit does not drone Riverside but it is a fusil is not correct if the roadhog is not Aristotelian. sent11: the Fall is not a impermissibility. sent12: the propagation does not drone Riverside if there is something such that it is not a Aristotelian and it is a kind of a impermissibility. sent13: if the ascent is not a kind of a sensitivity and does not extinguish Ceratodontidae the soffit is not a fusil. sent14: that if something contributes Windsor but it is not a Fomor the Mecca does not drone jawed is correct.
sent13 & sent6 -> int1: the soffit is not a fusil.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the roadhog is not a Aristotelian but it is a impermissibility.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a Aristotelian and it is a impermissibility.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the propagation does not drone Riverside.; sent2 -> int5: the equatorial does not drone soffit if that it does not drone jawed and it does not extinguish equatorial is incorrect.;
the equatorial does drone soffit.
$hypothesis$ = the equatorial does not drone soffit. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Mecca does not drone jawed that the equatorial does not drone jawed and it does not extinguish equatorial is not correct. sent2: if the fact that something does not drone jawed and does not extinguish equatorial is not correct the fact that it does not drone soffit hold. sent3: the ascent does not extinguish Ceratodontidae and it is not a Aristotelian. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Aristotelian that is a kind of a impermissibility then the propagation does not drone Riverside. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a wish. sent6: the ascent is not a sensitivity and does not extinguish Ceratodontidae. sent7: if something does extinguish equatorial then it does not drone soffit. sent8: if the soffit is not a fusil the roadhog is not a Aristotelian and is a impermissibility. sent9: if the ascent is not a fusil the equatorial drones soffit and is a impermissibility. sent10: that the soffit does not drone Riverside but it is a fusil is not correct if the roadhog is not Aristotelian. sent11: the Fall is not a impermissibility. sent12: the propagation does not drone Riverside if there is something such that it is not a Aristotelian and it is a kind of a impermissibility. sent13: if the ascent is not a kind of a sensitivity and does not extinguish Ceratodontidae the soffit is not a fusil. sent14: that if something contributes Windsor but it is not a Fomor the Mecca does not drone jawed is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent6 -> int1: the soffit is not a fusil.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the roadhog is not a Aristotelian but it is a impermissibility.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a Aristotelian and it is a impermissibility.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the propagation does not drone Riverside.; sent2 -> int5: the equatorial does not drone soffit if that it does not drone jawed and it does not extinguish equatorial is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__