the lowland is Capetian.
sent1: the vantage is indusial if the Labor does not mingle antiperspirant and is empiric. sent2: the son is empiric. sent3: the Labor is a kind of a bone. sent4: if something is not tetravalent that it does mingle antiperspirant and it is non-Capetian is not true. sent5: the projectionist is not a kind of a Capetian. sent6: the Labor is not modern. sent7: that the son is non-anthropic is not incorrect. sent8: something is anthropic and/or it is empiric. sent9: the Labor is indusial if something mingles antiperspirant. sent10: the Labor is anthropic if the son is empiric. sent11: that the vantage is a Capetian is true. sent12: the vantage is a Capetian if the fact that something is indusial or is tetravalent or both is right. sent13: the son prices CPR. sent14: if the vantage is indusial then the lowland is a Capetian. sent15: the Labor is empiric. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is tetravalent is correct the son is anthropic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Labor mingles antiperspirant.; assump1 -> int1: the Labor mingles antiperspirant or it is tetravalent or both.; int1 -> int2: the fact that something mingles antiperspirant and/or is tetravalent is not wrong.;
the lowland is not a Capetian.
sent4 -> int3: that the Labor mingles antiperspirant but it is not Capetian does not hold if it is not tetravalent.;
$hypothesis$ = the lowland is Capetian. ; $context$ = sent1: the vantage is indusial if the Labor does not mingle antiperspirant and is empiric. sent2: the son is empiric. sent3: the Labor is a kind of a bone. sent4: if something is not tetravalent that it does mingle antiperspirant and it is non-Capetian is not true. sent5: the projectionist is not a kind of a Capetian. sent6: the Labor is not modern. sent7: that the son is non-anthropic is not incorrect. sent8: something is anthropic and/or it is empiric. sent9: the Labor is indusial if something mingles antiperspirant. sent10: the Labor is anthropic if the son is empiric. sent11: that the vantage is a Capetian is true. sent12: the vantage is a Capetian if the fact that something is indusial or is tetravalent or both is right. sent13: the son prices CPR. sent14: if the vantage is indusial then the lowland is a Capetian. sent15: the Labor is empiric. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is tetravalent is correct the son is anthropic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Labor mingles antiperspirant.; assump1 -> int1: the Labor mingles antiperspirant or it is tetravalent or both.; int1 -> int2: the fact that something mingles antiperspirant and/or is tetravalent is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__