that the endoscopy does not occur but the discountenancing acquittal occurs does not hold.
sent1: the intrusion brings about that the orient happens. sent2: if the presentationalness happens and the reminiscing does not occur then the manhandling bellboy happens. sent3: the abasicness occurs. sent4: if the percolating occurs the rendezvousing occurs. sent5: the intrusion happens. sent6: the presentationalness does not occur and the reminiscing does not occur if the theoterrorism occurs. sent7: if the gastroduodenalness does not occur and the constitution does not occur then the obligatoriness happens. sent8: both the non-prandialness and the non-side-to-sideness occurs if the filling occurs. sent9: that the endoscopy does not occur but the discountenancing acquittal occurs is wrong if the theoterrorism does not occur. sent10: that the demarche occurs hold. sent11: that the theoterrorism occurs results in the non-presentationalness. sent12: the discountenancing audible occurs. sent13: the acrocentricness triggers the solidness. sent14: the fastball does not occur and the internment occurs. sent15: if the manhandling mounted happens the fact that the endoscopy does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: the discountenancing pock does not occur and the blot does not occur if the isomerization happens. sent17: the theoterrorism occurs. sent18: the presentationalness does not occur. sent19: if the manhandling bellboy and/or the manhandling mounted occurs the fact that the endoscopy occurs does not hold. sent20: the aweing Marxist does not occur but the telocentricness happens. sent21: the absentness happens. sent22: the orient triggers the discountenancing acquittal. sent23: that the manhandling bellboy does not occur is prevented by that the presentationalness does not occur and the reminiscing does not occur.
sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the presentationalness does not occur and the reminiscing does not occur.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the manhandling bellboy occurs.; int2 -> int3: the manhandling bellboy or the manhandling mounted or both occurs.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: that the endoscopy does not occur is right.; sent1 & sent5 -> int5: the orienting occurs.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the discountenancing acquittal happens.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that that not the endoscopy but the discountenancing acquittal occurs is right is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the endoscopy does not occur but the discountenancing acquittal occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the intrusion brings about that the orient happens. sent2: if the presentationalness happens and the reminiscing does not occur then the manhandling bellboy happens. sent3: the abasicness occurs. sent4: if the percolating occurs the rendezvousing occurs. sent5: the intrusion happens. sent6: the presentationalness does not occur and the reminiscing does not occur if the theoterrorism occurs. sent7: if the gastroduodenalness does not occur and the constitution does not occur then the obligatoriness happens. sent8: both the non-prandialness and the non-side-to-sideness occurs if the filling occurs. sent9: that the endoscopy does not occur but the discountenancing acquittal occurs is wrong if the theoterrorism does not occur. sent10: that the demarche occurs hold. sent11: that the theoterrorism occurs results in the non-presentationalness. sent12: the discountenancing audible occurs. sent13: the acrocentricness triggers the solidness. sent14: the fastball does not occur and the internment occurs. sent15: if the manhandling mounted happens the fact that the endoscopy does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: the discountenancing pock does not occur and the blot does not occur if the isomerization happens. sent17: the theoterrorism occurs. sent18: the presentationalness does not occur. sent19: if the manhandling bellboy and/or the manhandling mounted occurs the fact that the endoscopy occurs does not hold. sent20: the aweing Marxist does not occur but the telocentricness happens. sent21: the absentness happens. sent22: the orient triggers the discountenancing acquittal. sent23: that the manhandling bellboy does not occur is prevented by that the presentationalness does not occur and the reminiscing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the presentationalness does not occur and the reminiscing does not occur.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the manhandling bellboy occurs.; int2 -> int3: the manhandling bellboy or the manhandling mounted or both occurs.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: that the endoscopy does not occur is right.; sent1 & sent5 -> int5: the orienting occurs.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the discountenancing acquittal happens.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__