the endoscope is behavioristic.
sent1: if the sclerite does not heal sparrow and is nonpolitical the gemsbok is not stomatous. sent2: if the retrofit is not neuroglial but it is meningeal then it is an explosive. sent3: if the feedback is not defeasible then that that the retrofit is explosive but it is not auditory is not true hold. sent4: something is not a Anguillula and not defeasible if it is not a Syria. sent5: if the gemsbok is not stomatous then the skewer is not unairworthy but premenopausal. sent6: there exists something such that it does brevet and/or is not metatarsal. sent7: if the fact that the retrofit is not neuroglial but it is meningeal is not right the skewer is defeasible. sent8: the fact that the skewer is not a kind of a Anguillula does not hold. sent9: the retrofit is premenopausal. sent10: the retrofit is not a kind of a Syria. sent11: the feedback is not premenopausal. sent12: the sclerite is a kind of a brevet if something is a brevet and/or non-metatarsal. sent13: the retrofit is a M. sent14: the fact that the endoscope is a Syria is true if a defeasible thing is a Anguillula. sent15: if something is auditory the fact that it does not thrust erica or does transmit or both does not hold. sent16: the endoscope is not non-premenopausal or a Syria or both. sent17: that the endoscope is a kind of an explosive is true if the retrofit is a kind of an explosive. sent18: that the retrofit is the explosive if the retrofit is neuroglial thing that is meningeal hold. sent19: that the endoscope is behavioristic hold if it is a Syria. sent20: the sclerite does not heal sparrow but it is nonpolitical if it is a kind of a brevet. sent21: there is something such that it is meningeal. sent22: the feedback is not an explosive or is auditory or both if it is not premenopausal. sent23: if the retrofit is behavioristic the endoscope is explosive. sent24: there exists something such that it is behavioristic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retrofit is non-neuroglial and meningeal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the retrofit is explosive.; sent22 & sent11 -> int2: the feedback is not a kind of an explosive or is auditory or both.;
the endoscope is not behavioristic.
sent4 -> int3: if the fact that the feedback is not a Syria is not incorrect then it is not a Anguillula and it is not defeasible.; sent6 & sent12 -> int4: the sclerite is a brevet.; sent20 & int4 -> int5: that the sclerite does not heal sparrow and is nonpolitical is not incorrect.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the gemsbok is not stomatous.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the skewer is not unairworthy but it is premenopausal.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is not unairworthy and it is premenopausal is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the endoscope is behavioristic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sclerite does not heal sparrow and is nonpolitical the gemsbok is not stomatous. sent2: if the retrofit is not neuroglial but it is meningeal then it is an explosive. sent3: if the feedback is not defeasible then that that the retrofit is explosive but it is not auditory is not true hold. sent4: something is not a Anguillula and not defeasible if it is not a Syria. sent5: if the gemsbok is not stomatous then the skewer is not unairworthy but premenopausal. sent6: there exists something such that it does brevet and/or is not metatarsal. sent7: if the fact that the retrofit is not neuroglial but it is meningeal is not right the skewer is defeasible. sent8: the fact that the skewer is not a kind of a Anguillula does not hold. sent9: the retrofit is premenopausal. sent10: the retrofit is not a kind of a Syria. sent11: the feedback is not premenopausal. sent12: the sclerite is a kind of a brevet if something is a brevet and/or non-metatarsal. sent13: the retrofit is a M. sent14: the fact that the endoscope is a Syria is true if a defeasible thing is a Anguillula. sent15: if something is auditory the fact that it does not thrust erica or does transmit or both does not hold. sent16: the endoscope is not non-premenopausal or a Syria or both. sent17: that the endoscope is a kind of an explosive is true if the retrofit is a kind of an explosive. sent18: that the retrofit is the explosive if the retrofit is neuroglial thing that is meningeal hold. sent19: that the endoscope is behavioristic hold if it is a Syria. sent20: the sclerite does not heal sparrow but it is nonpolitical if it is a kind of a brevet. sent21: there is something such that it is meningeal. sent22: the feedback is not an explosive or is auditory or both if it is not premenopausal. sent23: if the retrofit is behavioristic the endoscope is explosive. sent24: there exists something such that it is behavioristic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retrofit is non-neuroglial and meningeal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the retrofit is explosive.; sent22 & sent11 -> int2: the feedback is not a kind of an explosive or is auditory or both.; __UNKNOWN__