the reserpine is both Leonardesque and non-particularistic.
sent1: the tranylcypromine is not a kind of an archduke. sent2: something is heterodactyl if it is creative. sent3: the cube is creative if the fact that the tranylcypromine is not an archduke is right. sent4: something is an archduke if it is Leonardesque. sent5: something is not Leonardesque if it is not a kind of a Saxifraga. sent6: something that is heterodactyl is not a kind of a Saxifraga. sent7: the fact that something is both heterodactyl and uncreative is false if it is a Saxifraga. sent8: if the cube is not Leonardesque then that the reserpine is not Leonardesque and is not particularistic is incorrect. sent9: if the nudnik does not blemish merman but it is a resolution the cube is a kind of a Saxifraga.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the cube is not uncreative.; sent2 -> int2: that the cube is heterodactyl is correct if it is creative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cube is heterodactyl.; sent6 -> int4: if the cube is heterodactyl the fact that it is not a Saxifraga is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cube is not a Saxifraga.; sent5 -> int6: if the fact that the cube is not a Saxifraga hold it is not Leonardesque.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cube is not Leonardesque.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the reserpine is Leonardesque and is not particularistic.
sent7 -> int8: that the cube is heterodactyl but it is not creative is wrong if it is a kind of a Saxifraga.;
$hypothesis$ = the reserpine is both Leonardesque and non-particularistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the tranylcypromine is not a kind of an archduke. sent2: something is heterodactyl if it is creative. sent3: the cube is creative if the fact that the tranylcypromine is not an archduke is right. sent4: something is an archduke if it is Leonardesque. sent5: something is not Leonardesque if it is not a kind of a Saxifraga. sent6: something that is heterodactyl is not a kind of a Saxifraga. sent7: the fact that something is both heterodactyl and uncreative is false if it is a Saxifraga. sent8: if the cube is not Leonardesque then that the reserpine is not Leonardesque and is not particularistic is incorrect. sent9: if the nudnik does not blemish merman but it is a resolution the cube is a kind of a Saxifraga. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the cube is not uncreative.; sent2 -> int2: that the cube is heterodactyl is correct if it is creative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cube is heterodactyl.; sent6 -> int4: if the cube is heterodactyl the fact that it is not a Saxifraga is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cube is not a Saxifraga.; sent5 -> int6: if the fact that the cube is not a Saxifraga hold it is not Leonardesque.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cube is not Leonardesque.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__