the fact that the impalpableness does not occur and the pushover does not occur if the bind occurs is wrong.
sent1: that both the spending sixtieth and the skirt occurs causes that the sadness happens. sent2: the defibrillation does not occur if the testifying mammalogist does not occur. sent3: that that the palpableness and/or the bind happens is right is caused by the pushover. sent4: if the testifying accessory occurs the fact that the spending Rasht does not occur and the spending rioting does not occur is not true. sent5: the testifying accessory happens. sent6: the testifying mammalogist occurs. sent7: that both the testifying mammalogist and the impalpableness happens triggers that the binding does not occur. sent8: not the pushover but the groundwork occurs if the Orion does not occur. sent9: the Orion does not occur if that the spending Rasht does not occur and the spending rioting does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the impalpableness occurs.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the testifying mammalogist and the impalpableness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the binding does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the binding occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the impalpableness does not occur.; sent4 & sent5 -> int5: that the spending Rasht does not occur and the spending rioting does not occur does not hold.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the Orion does not occur.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: not the pushover but the groundwork happens.; int7 -> int8: the pushover does not occur.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the impalpableness does not occur and the pushover does not occur.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the defibrillation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the impalpableness does not occur and the pushover does not occur if the bind occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the spending sixtieth and the skirt occurs causes that the sadness happens. sent2: the defibrillation does not occur if the testifying mammalogist does not occur. sent3: that that the palpableness and/or the bind happens is right is caused by the pushover. sent4: if the testifying accessory occurs the fact that the spending Rasht does not occur and the spending rioting does not occur is not true. sent5: the testifying accessory happens. sent6: the testifying mammalogist occurs. sent7: that both the testifying mammalogist and the impalpableness happens triggers that the binding does not occur. sent8: not the pushover but the groundwork occurs if the Orion does not occur. sent9: the Orion does not occur if that the spending Rasht does not occur and the spending rioting does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the impalpableness occurs.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the testifying mammalogist and the impalpableness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the binding does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the binding occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the impalpableness does not occur.; sent4 & sent5 -> int5: that the spending Rasht does not occur and the spending rioting does not occur does not hold.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the Orion does not occur.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: not the pushover but the groundwork happens.; int7 -> int8: the pushover does not occur.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the impalpableness does not occur and the pushover does not occur.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__