the churn is not a sanction but it is a kind of a biosynthesis.
sent1: the thioguanine does not reciprocate Logrono if the Parks is adjudicative but it does not reciprocate Logrono. sent2: the fact that the churn is not a sanction but it is a biosynthesis does not hold if the thioguanine is not a biosynthesis. sent3: if that either something is a prednisolone or it does fancy or both is false it does not prophesy. sent4: if the thioguanine does not reciprocate Logrono then it is not a kind of a biosynthesis. sent5: if that the thioguanine does not reciprocate Logrono is not false that the hydrophyte is a kind of a differential and it is a Vinylite is not right. sent6: if that something prophesies and is a kind of a Miller is incorrect then it is not a Miller. sent7: the fact that the jailer champions platyrrhine but it is not invertebrate is incorrect. sent8: the Byelorussian is a fancy and/or a prednisolone. sent9: that the Byelorussian is not a Miller or it does not prophesy or both is incorrect. sent10: if that the thioguanine is not a kind of a Vinylite but it does reciprocate Logrono does not hold then it is not a biosynthesis. sent11: if the Byelorussian does not fancy and/or is a prednisolone then the hydrophyte is not a differential. sent12: if the Byelorussian is a Miller then that it does not fancy and/or is a prednisolone hold. sent13: the fact that something is a prednisolone and/or it is fancy does not hold if it is not a differential. sent14: the fact that the thioguanine is not a kind of a Vinylite and reciprocates Logrono is not right if the hydrophyte is not a differential. sent15: the Parks is adjudicative but it does not reciprocate Logrono if the goosander does reciprocate finished. sent16: that the churn is not a biosynthesis and is a sanction is wrong if the thioguanine is not a sanction. sent17: if the fact that something is not veinal and hugs evolutionism does not hold it is not inadvisable. sent18: that the churn is a sanction and it is a kind of a biosynthesis does not hold if the thioguanine is not a biosynthesis. sent19: something is not a sanction but a biosynthesis if it is not a Miller.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Byelorussian is not a Miller.; assump1 -> int1: the Byelorussian is not a Miller and/or it does not prophesy.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Byelorussian is a kind of a Miller.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the Byelorussian either is not fancy or is a prednisolone or both hold.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the hydrophyte is not a differential.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the thioguanine is not a kind of a Vinylite but it reciprocates Logrono is false.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the thioguanine is not a biosynthesis is not false.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the hydrophyte is not inadvisable if the fact that it is not veinal and it hugs evolutionism is not true.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the churn is not a sanction but it is a kind of a biosynthesis. ; $context$ = sent1: the thioguanine does not reciprocate Logrono if the Parks is adjudicative but it does not reciprocate Logrono. sent2: the fact that the churn is not a sanction but it is a biosynthesis does not hold if the thioguanine is not a biosynthesis. sent3: if that either something is a prednisolone or it does fancy or both is false it does not prophesy. sent4: if the thioguanine does not reciprocate Logrono then it is not a kind of a biosynthesis. sent5: if that the thioguanine does not reciprocate Logrono is not false that the hydrophyte is a kind of a differential and it is a Vinylite is not right. sent6: if that something prophesies and is a kind of a Miller is incorrect then it is not a Miller. sent7: the fact that the jailer champions platyrrhine but it is not invertebrate is incorrect. sent8: the Byelorussian is a fancy and/or a prednisolone. sent9: that the Byelorussian is not a Miller or it does not prophesy or both is incorrect. sent10: if that the thioguanine is not a kind of a Vinylite but it does reciprocate Logrono does not hold then it is not a biosynthesis. sent11: if the Byelorussian does not fancy and/or is a prednisolone then the hydrophyte is not a differential. sent12: if the Byelorussian is a Miller then that it does not fancy and/or is a prednisolone hold. sent13: the fact that something is a prednisolone and/or it is fancy does not hold if it is not a differential. sent14: the fact that the thioguanine is not a kind of a Vinylite and reciprocates Logrono is not right if the hydrophyte is not a differential. sent15: the Parks is adjudicative but it does not reciprocate Logrono if the goosander does reciprocate finished. sent16: that the churn is not a biosynthesis and is a sanction is wrong if the thioguanine is not a sanction. sent17: if the fact that something is not veinal and hugs evolutionism does not hold it is not inadvisable. sent18: that the churn is a sanction and it is a kind of a biosynthesis does not hold if the thioguanine is not a biosynthesis. sent19: something is not a sanction but a biosynthesis if it is not a Miller. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Byelorussian is not a Miller.; assump1 -> int1: the Byelorussian is not a Miller and/or it does not prophesy.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Byelorussian is a kind of a Miller.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the Byelorussian either is not fancy or is a prednisolone or both hold.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the hydrophyte is not a differential.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the thioguanine is not a kind of a Vinylite but it reciprocates Logrono is false.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the thioguanine is not a biosynthesis is not false.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__