that the ingloriousness does not occur and the placentalness does not occur is wrong.
sent1: if the manifesting stockpot does not occur that the specialisticness does not occur but the handing Corot occurs is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the sashay but not the hair-raiser occurs is not right the sashay does not occur. sent3: the gluttonizing does not occur if that the gluttonizing happens and the azoticness does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the placental does not occur if the fact that the secretoriness occurs and the overwriting does not occur is wrong. sent5: if the gluttonizing occurs the fact that the fact that the secretoriness happens and the overwriting does not occur is incorrect is true. sent6: either that the hair-raiser does not occur or that the neologism does not occur or both is caused by that the nascentness happens. sent7: that both the neologism and the nascentness happens is caused by that the handing Corot does not occur. sent8: if the slugging occurs then that the interpenetration does not occur and the groove does not occur does not hold. sent9: the grooving occurs if the interpenetration happens. sent10: the sashay results in that both the non-ingloriousness and the non-azoticness occurs. sent11: the manifesting stockpot does not occur if the fact that the interpenetration does not occur and the grooving does not occur is not right. sent12: if the fact that the specialisticness does not occur but the handing Corot happens does not hold then the handing Corot does not occur. sent13: if the gluttonizing does not occur that the ingloriousness does not occur and the placentalness does not occur is not correct. sent14: both the non-specialisticness and the manifesting stockpot happens if that the groove occurs hold. sent15: if that not the disabusing inadmissibility but the sashay happens is incorrect the sashay does not occur. sent16: the fact that the sashay happens but the hair-raiser does not occur is not true if the disabusing inadmissibility occurs. sent17: if the fact that the gluttonizing occurs is right then that both the secretoriness and the overwriting occurs is not correct. sent18: the sashay occurs. sent19: if that the azoticness but not the up-bow occurs does not hold the azoticness does not occur. sent20: the fact that the disabusing inadmissibility occurs is correct if the neologism occurs. sent21: if the sashay does not occur the fact that the azoticness happens and the up-bow does not occur does not hold. sent22: the azoticness does not occur. sent23: the fact that not the disabusing inadmissibility but the sashay occurs is not true if the up-bow does not occur. sent24: the gluttonizing occurs.
sent5 & sent24 -> int1: that the secretoriness happens but the overwriting does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the placental does not occur.; sent10 & sent18 -> int3: the non-ingloriousness and the non-azoticness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the ingloriousness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the gloriousness and the non-placentalness occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the ingloriousness does not occur and the placentalness does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the manifesting stockpot does not occur that the specialisticness does not occur but the handing Corot occurs is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the sashay but not the hair-raiser occurs is not right the sashay does not occur. sent3: the gluttonizing does not occur if that the gluttonizing happens and the azoticness does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the placental does not occur if the fact that the secretoriness occurs and the overwriting does not occur is wrong. sent5: if the gluttonizing occurs the fact that the fact that the secretoriness happens and the overwriting does not occur is incorrect is true. sent6: either that the hair-raiser does not occur or that the neologism does not occur or both is caused by that the nascentness happens. sent7: that both the neologism and the nascentness happens is caused by that the handing Corot does not occur. sent8: if the slugging occurs then that the interpenetration does not occur and the groove does not occur does not hold. sent9: the grooving occurs if the interpenetration happens. sent10: the sashay results in that both the non-ingloriousness and the non-azoticness occurs. sent11: the manifesting stockpot does not occur if the fact that the interpenetration does not occur and the grooving does not occur is not right. sent12: if the fact that the specialisticness does not occur but the handing Corot happens does not hold then the handing Corot does not occur. sent13: if the gluttonizing does not occur that the ingloriousness does not occur and the placentalness does not occur is not correct. sent14: both the non-specialisticness and the manifesting stockpot happens if that the groove occurs hold. sent15: if that not the disabusing inadmissibility but the sashay happens is incorrect the sashay does not occur. sent16: the fact that the sashay happens but the hair-raiser does not occur is not true if the disabusing inadmissibility occurs. sent17: if the fact that the gluttonizing occurs is right then that both the secretoriness and the overwriting occurs is not correct. sent18: the sashay occurs. sent19: if that the azoticness but not the up-bow occurs does not hold the azoticness does not occur. sent20: the fact that the disabusing inadmissibility occurs is correct if the neologism occurs. sent21: if the sashay does not occur the fact that the azoticness happens and the up-bow does not occur does not hold. sent22: the azoticness does not occur. sent23: the fact that not the disabusing inadmissibility but the sashay occurs is not true if the up-bow does not occur. sent24: the gluttonizing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent24 -> int1: that the secretoriness happens but the overwriting does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the placental does not occur.; sent10 & sent18 -> int3: the non-ingloriousness and the non-azoticness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the ingloriousness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__