the afterpiece is not an adhesion.
sent1: that the twill does not platinize callosity if the afterpiece is not an adhesion and is ethical is right. sent2: if the twill is not Rousseauan but a innocense the basidiolichen is not a grapefruit. sent3: the twill is not a grapefruit if the fact that it does not platinize callosity and/or is non-adenocarcinomatous does not hold. sent4: if the twill is not a innocense that the afterpiece is not a innocense or it is not a grapefruit or both is wrong. sent5: that the afterpiece is not a grapefruit and/or it is not a tetherball is not true if the basidiolichen is not a kind of a grapefruit. sent6: the fact that the twill is ethical is correct if that it is not Rousseauan and is a kind of a innocense does not hold. sent7: the twill is not a kind of an adhesion. sent8: the cornerstone is not adenocarcinomatous. sent9: if the syconium is not agricultural then it is not a tetherball. sent10: if something is not a psephology the fact that the basidiolichen is both a psephology and thermodynamic is not true. sent11: if there exists something such that it blights then the cornerstone is a warship and/or it blights. sent12: the afterpiece platinizes callosity. sent13: something does blight. sent14: the fact that the twill does platinize callosity and is not adenocarcinomatous is not true if the basidiolichen is not thermodynamic. sent15: something is a kind of a anchusa if it is a kind of a blight. sent16: the fact that something is ethical and is a kind of a tetherball is false if it does not platinize callosity. sent17: something is not an adhesion if that it is not a kind of a grapefruit and/or it is not a tetherball does not hold. sent18: if the cornerstone is a anchusa then it is not vicinal and is a kind of a psephology. sent19: something is not thermodynamic if that it is a psephology and it is thermodynamic is not true. sent20: that the twill is adenocarcinomatous and platinizes callosity is incorrect. sent21: something is a anchusa if it is a warship. sent22: the twill is not ethical if that it is adenocarcinomatous and does platinize callosity does not hold. sent23: the coon is not a psephology if the cornerstone is non-vicinal thing that is a kind of a psephology. sent24: that the twill is not a grapefruit is true. sent25: the basidiolichen is not adenocarcinomatous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the twill is not Rousseauan and is a innocense is not right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the twill is ethical.; sent22 & sent20 -> int2: the twill is not ethical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the twill is both not Rousseauan and a innocense.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the basidiolichen is not a grapefruit.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the afterpiece is not a grapefruit and/or it is not a tetherball is true does not hold.; sent17 -> int7: if the fact that the afterpiece is not a grapefruit and/or it is not a tetherball does not hold it is not an adhesion.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the afterpiece is a kind of an adhesion.
sent16 -> int8: the fact that that the twill is ethical and a tetherball does not hold is not false if it does not platinize callosity.; sent19 -> int9: the basidiolichen is not thermodynamic if that it is a psephology and it is thermodynamic is not correct.; sent13 & sent11 -> int10: the cornerstone is a kind of a warship or it is a kind of a blight or both.; sent21 -> int11: the cornerstone is a kind of a anchusa if it is a warship.; sent15 -> int12: the cornerstone is a kind of a anchusa if it is a blight.; int10 & int11 & int12 -> int13: the cornerstone is a kind of a anchusa.; sent18 & int13 -> int14: the cornerstone is not vicinal but it is a kind of a psephology.; sent23 & int14 -> int15: the coon is not a psephology.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is not a psephology.; int16 & sent10 -> int17: the fact that the fact that the basidiolichen is a psephology and it is thermodynamic is right does not hold.; int9 & int17 -> int18: the basidiolichen is not thermodynamic.; sent14 & int18 -> int19: the fact that that the twill does platinize callosity but it is not adenocarcinomatous is not correct hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the afterpiece is not an adhesion. ; $context$ = sent1: that the twill does not platinize callosity if the afterpiece is not an adhesion and is ethical is right. sent2: if the twill is not Rousseauan but a innocense the basidiolichen is not a grapefruit. sent3: the twill is not a grapefruit if the fact that it does not platinize callosity and/or is non-adenocarcinomatous does not hold. sent4: if the twill is not a innocense that the afterpiece is not a innocense or it is not a grapefruit or both is wrong. sent5: that the afterpiece is not a grapefruit and/or it is not a tetherball is not true if the basidiolichen is not a kind of a grapefruit. sent6: the fact that the twill is ethical is correct if that it is not Rousseauan and is a kind of a innocense does not hold. sent7: the twill is not a kind of an adhesion. sent8: the cornerstone is not adenocarcinomatous. sent9: if the syconium is not agricultural then it is not a tetherball. sent10: if something is not a psephology the fact that the basidiolichen is both a psephology and thermodynamic is not true. sent11: if there exists something such that it blights then the cornerstone is a warship and/or it blights. sent12: the afterpiece platinizes callosity. sent13: something does blight. sent14: the fact that the twill does platinize callosity and is not adenocarcinomatous is not true if the basidiolichen is not thermodynamic. sent15: something is a kind of a anchusa if it is a kind of a blight. sent16: the fact that something is ethical and is a kind of a tetherball is false if it does not platinize callosity. sent17: something is not an adhesion if that it is not a kind of a grapefruit and/or it is not a tetherball does not hold. sent18: if the cornerstone is a anchusa then it is not vicinal and is a kind of a psephology. sent19: something is not thermodynamic if that it is a psephology and it is thermodynamic is not true. sent20: that the twill is adenocarcinomatous and platinizes callosity is incorrect. sent21: something is a anchusa if it is a warship. sent22: the twill is not ethical if that it is adenocarcinomatous and does platinize callosity does not hold. sent23: the coon is not a psephology if the cornerstone is non-vicinal thing that is a kind of a psephology. sent24: that the twill is not a grapefruit is true. sent25: the basidiolichen is not adenocarcinomatous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the twill is not Rousseauan and is a innocense is not right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the twill is ethical.; sent22 & sent20 -> int2: the twill is not ethical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the twill is both not Rousseauan and a innocense.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the basidiolichen is not a grapefruit.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the afterpiece is not a grapefruit and/or it is not a tetherball is true does not hold.; sent17 -> int7: if the fact that the afterpiece is not a grapefruit and/or it is not a tetherball does not hold it is not an adhesion.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__