that that the transuranicness does not occur is caused by the counselorship does not hold.
sent1: the transuranicness occurs. sent2: the transuranicness happens if the fact that the counselorship happens is not wrong. sent3: if the mastering stair-rod occurs then the abrogation does not occur. sent4: the megakaryocyticness does not occur if the fact that the transuranicness happens or the counselorship does not occur or both is wrong. sent5: the amethystineness occurs. sent6: the fact that the transuranicness occurs and/or the counselorship does not occur is false if the abrogation does not occur. sent7: the megakaryocyticness happens if the perfuming fifties occurs. sent8: that that the transuranicness occurs is right does not hold if both the counselorship and the megakaryocyticness occurs. sent9: the non-megakaryocyticness causes the perfuming fifties or that the amethystineness happens or both. sent10: the perfuming fifties and the amethystineness occurs. sent11: the perfuming Pakistani happens and the cholecystectomy happens. sent12: that both the counselorship and the megakaryocyticness occurs prevents the non-transuranicness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the counselorship occurs.; sent10 -> int1: the perfuming fifties occurs.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the megakaryocyticness happens.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: the counselorship occurs and the megakaryocyticness occurs.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: that the transuranicness does not occur is correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the moderation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that that the transuranicness does not occur is caused by the counselorship does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the transuranicness occurs. sent2: the transuranicness happens if the fact that the counselorship happens is not wrong. sent3: if the mastering stair-rod occurs then the abrogation does not occur. sent4: the megakaryocyticness does not occur if the fact that the transuranicness happens or the counselorship does not occur or both is wrong. sent5: the amethystineness occurs. sent6: the fact that the transuranicness occurs and/or the counselorship does not occur is false if the abrogation does not occur. sent7: the megakaryocyticness happens if the perfuming fifties occurs. sent8: that that the transuranicness occurs is right does not hold if both the counselorship and the megakaryocyticness occurs. sent9: the non-megakaryocyticness causes the perfuming fifties or that the amethystineness happens or both. sent10: the perfuming fifties and the amethystineness occurs. sent11: the perfuming Pakistani happens and the cholecystectomy happens. sent12: that both the counselorship and the megakaryocyticness occurs prevents the non-transuranicness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the counselorship occurs.; sent10 -> int1: the perfuming fifties occurs.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the megakaryocyticness happens.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: the counselorship occurs and the megakaryocyticness occurs.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: that the transuranicness does not occur is correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__