if the registration happens then that the rerunning flourish happens is not false.
sent1: that the destalinizing giantism does not occur brings about that the TELINT does not occur and the rerunning flourish does not occur. sent2: the destalinizing stowage occurs. sent3: if the registration happens and the makeshift happens then the destalinizing stowage does not occur. sent4: the fact that the springtide does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the nepotism occurs. sent6: the fact that the discord happens is not incorrect. sent7: both the moksa and the sympatricness happens. sent8: the crucialness does not occur. sent9: the by-product happens. sent10: the abstracting does not occur if the registration does not occur and/or the makeshift happens. sent11: the improvidentness occurs. sent12: the destalinizing hickey does not occur. sent13: the conventionalness does not occur. sent14: the protesting drafter occurs. sent15: the inroad occurs and the bodywork occurs. sent16: not the destalinizing Justice but the nepotism occurs if that the springtide does not occur is correct. sent17: both the reprieve and the ametabolicness happens. sent18: the destalinizing giantism does not occur and the trundling combined does not occur if the destalinizing Justice does not occur. sent19: the fact that the protesting blighted happens hold. sent20: if the makeshift does not occur the rerunning flourish happens. sent21: if that the pool does not occur is not wrong the fact that the handicraft occurs is not false. sent22: the throning happens and the basinalness happens. sent23: the rerunning Eyck happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the registration happens hold.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the makeshift occurs is true.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: both the registration and the makeshift occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the destalinizing stowage does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the makeshift does not occur.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the rerunning flourish occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the abstracting does not occur.
sent16 & sent4 -> int6: not the destalinizing Justice but the nepotism occurs.; int6 -> int7: that the destalinizing Justice does not occur hold.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the destalinizing giantism does not occur and the trundling combined does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the destalinizing giantism does not occur.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the TELINT does not occur and the rerunning flourish does not occur.; int10 -> int11: the rerunning flourish does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = if the registration happens then that the rerunning flourish happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the destalinizing giantism does not occur brings about that the TELINT does not occur and the rerunning flourish does not occur. sent2: the destalinizing stowage occurs. sent3: if the registration happens and the makeshift happens then the destalinizing stowage does not occur. sent4: the fact that the springtide does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the nepotism occurs. sent6: the fact that the discord happens is not incorrect. sent7: both the moksa and the sympatricness happens. sent8: the crucialness does not occur. sent9: the by-product happens. sent10: the abstracting does not occur if the registration does not occur and/or the makeshift happens. sent11: the improvidentness occurs. sent12: the destalinizing hickey does not occur. sent13: the conventionalness does not occur. sent14: the protesting drafter occurs. sent15: the inroad occurs and the bodywork occurs. sent16: not the destalinizing Justice but the nepotism occurs if that the springtide does not occur is correct. sent17: both the reprieve and the ametabolicness happens. sent18: the destalinizing giantism does not occur and the trundling combined does not occur if the destalinizing Justice does not occur. sent19: the fact that the protesting blighted happens hold. sent20: if the makeshift does not occur the rerunning flourish happens. sent21: if that the pool does not occur is not wrong the fact that the handicraft occurs is not false. sent22: the throning happens and the basinalness happens. sent23: the rerunning Eyck happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the registration happens hold.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the makeshift occurs is true.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: both the registration and the makeshift occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the destalinizing stowage does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the makeshift does not occur.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the rerunning flourish occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__