the fact that there is something such that it does not fear allocution and does uniform does not hold.
sent1: the Carolingian does not fear allocution and/or it does not gladden ballot. sent2: if the Carolingian either does not fear allocution or does not gladden ballot or both then it does not fear allocution. sent3: the Carolingian does not fear mastership but it is a kind of a magnetometer. sent4: that the Carolingian is a kind of the uniformed if the Carolingian does not fear mastership and is a magnetometer is true.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the Carolingian is a kind of a uniformed.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the Carolingian does not fear allocution.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Carolingian does not fear allocution but it uniforms.; int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it does not fear allocution and does uniform does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Carolingian does not fear allocution and/or it does not gladden ballot. sent2: if the Carolingian either does not fear allocution or does not gladden ballot or both then it does not fear allocution. sent3: the Carolingian does not fear mastership but it is a kind of a magnetometer. sent4: that the Carolingian is a kind of the uniformed if the Carolingian does not fear mastership and is a magnetometer is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the Carolingian is a kind of a uniformed.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the Carolingian does not fear allocution.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Carolingian does not fear allocution but it uniforms.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__