the passenger does not severalize WHO.
sent1: the passenger does quibble and it is a view. sent2: if the aspic severalizes WHO then the passenger is a view. sent3: the aspic concocts. sent4: the passenger is dorsal and not non-electronics. sent5: the aspic does severalize WHO. sent6: the dorsum is a view. sent7: the passenger views. sent8: the endemic does severalize WHO. sent9: the passenger is a kind of a load and it is a view. sent10: the marinade is not a butterfat if the antineutron is not a kind of a pension and is not irrelevant. sent11: something that does severalize WHO does concoct. sent12: the aspic does concoct and it is a view. sent13: something does not pension but it is relevant if it is branchless. sent14: the sadomasochist views. sent15: the millpond severalizes WHO. sent16: if the honesty does not concoct then the fact that the aspic is a kind of a view and it does severalize WHO is not right. sent17: the antineutron is branchless if that the hydrocarbon is branchless is correct. sent18: the feldspar views. sent19: the passenger does severalize WHO if the aspic is a view.
sent12 -> int1: the aspic is a view.; sent19 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the passenger does not severalize WHO.
sent13 -> int2: if the antineutron is branchless it is not a kind of a pension and is relevant.;
$hypothesis$ = the passenger does not severalize WHO. ; $context$ = sent1: the passenger does quibble and it is a view. sent2: if the aspic severalizes WHO then the passenger is a view. sent3: the aspic concocts. sent4: the passenger is dorsal and not non-electronics. sent5: the aspic does severalize WHO. sent6: the dorsum is a view. sent7: the passenger views. sent8: the endemic does severalize WHO. sent9: the passenger is a kind of a load and it is a view. sent10: the marinade is not a butterfat if the antineutron is not a kind of a pension and is not irrelevant. sent11: something that does severalize WHO does concoct. sent12: the aspic does concoct and it is a view. sent13: something does not pension but it is relevant if it is branchless. sent14: the sadomasochist views. sent15: the millpond severalizes WHO. sent16: if the honesty does not concoct then the fact that the aspic is a kind of a view and it does severalize WHO is not right. sent17: the antineutron is branchless if that the hydrocarbon is branchless is correct. sent18: the feldspar views. sent19: the passenger does severalize WHO if the aspic is a view. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the aspic is a view.; sent19 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__