there is something such that if it does carjack oblate then the fact that it is non-extrinsic thing that is a Andorran is not true.
sent1: that that the valley is extrinsic and it is a Andorran is incorrect hold if it does carjack oblate. sent2: if the bookbindery is anuretic then the fact that it does not segregate needlefish and is downstream is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if that it carjacks oblate is true then it is not extrinsic and is Andorran. sent4: the fact that something is not a Andorran but it is sociolinguistics is not true if it does junketeer. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a drone then the fact that it is not a Moulmein and is catholic is wrong. sent6: if the valley is bronchoscopic then that it does not carjack catalog and it is Andorran is not false. sent7: there exists something such that if it does dado wiggle that it is not a morel but a brocaded is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if it carjacks oblate then the fact that it is extrinsic thing that is Andorran is not right. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it thrills is true the fact that it is not divisible and it does carjack valley does not hold. sent10: the valley is not extrinsic and is a kind of a Andorran if it does carjack oblate. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Pakistani the fact that it is a Innsbruck that is a kind of a Bennington is false. sent12: if that the juggernaut carjacks Carrere is not wrong then it is not a flotation but Andorran. sent13: if the valley does segregate extravagance that it does carjack second-rater and it carjacks oblate is not correct. sent14: if the valley dwindles then the fact that it does not carjack oblate and it carjacks second-rater is not right. sent15: there is something such that if it carjacks eyeball then that it is rh-positive and it is unreportable is false. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it is organismal is true the fact that it is not a kind of a western and is teleological is not true. sent17: there is something such that if it alarms then that it does segregate breakableness and it is a discourse is incorrect. sent18: if the valley is calcaneal then the fact that it is extrinsic and it is glabellar does not hold. sent19: if the valley does carjack oblate then the fact that it is non-extrinsic thing that is Andorran is false. sent20: if something is acneiform that it is not radiographic and it segregates bookbindery does not hold.
sent19 -> hypothesis;
if the NRTI does junketeer that it is not a kind of a Andorran and it is sociolinguistics is not right.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does carjack oblate then the fact that it is non-extrinsic thing that is a Andorran is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the valley is extrinsic and it is a Andorran is incorrect hold if it does carjack oblate. sent2: if the bookbindery is anuretic then the fact that it does not segregate needlefish and is downstream is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if that it carjacks oblate is true then it is not extrinsic and is Andorran. sent4: the fact that something is not a Andorran but it is sociolinguistics is not true if it does junketeer. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a drone then the fact that it is not a Moulmein and is catholic is wrong. sent6: if the valley is bronchoscopic then that it does not carjack catalog and it is Andorran is not false. sent7: there exists something such that if it does dado wiggle that it is not a morel but a brocaded is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if it carjacks oblate then the fact that it is extrinsic thing that is Andorran is not right. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it thrills is true the fact that it is not divisible and it does carjack valley does not hold. sent10: the valley is not extrinsic and is a kind of a Andorran if it does carjack oblate. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Pakistani the fact that it is a Innsbruck that is a kind of a Bennington is false. sent12: if that the juggernaut carjacks Carrere is not wrong then it is not a flotation but Andorran. sent13: if the valley does segregate extravagance that it does carjack second-rater and it carjacks oblate is not correct. sent14: if the valley dwindles then the fact that it does not carjack oblate and it carjacks second-rater is not right. sent15: there is something such that if it carjacks eyeball then that it is rh-positive and it is unreportable is false. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it is organismal is true the fact that it is not a kind of a western and is teleological is not true. sent17: there is something such that if it alarms then that it does segregate breakableness and it is a discourse is incorrect. sent18: if the valley is calcaneal then the fact that it is extrinsic and it is glabellar does not hold. sent19: if the valley does carjack oblate then the fact that it is non-extrinsic thing that is Andorran is false. sent20: if something is acneiform that it is not radiographic and it segregates bookbindery does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__