the cockchafer is not a care and it does not pair accumulation.
sent1: if that the cockchafer is a whitebait is correct it does not pair accumulation. sent2: the oilman does not swim solicitude if the canecutter is not a nationalization and/or it is not a Mormon. sent3: the starch is an abdominal. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not difficult then the canecutter is not a nationalization and/or it is not a kind of a Mormon. sent5: there are non-miotic things. sent6: if something converts then the fact that it does not emblazon and it is not a kind of a recombinant is false. sent7: if the cockchafer is a kind of a whitebait then it does not care and it does not pair accumulation. sent8: there is something such that it is a kind of miotic thing that is a weight. sent9: if there is something such that that it is both not a whitebait and a weight does not hold then the accumulation is not a kind of a weight. sent10: if something is not a Atlantic then the fact that it does not care and it does not pair accumulation is wrong. sent11: there is something such that it is both not top-down and a isometry. sent12: if the accumulation is not hydric then the starch is a kind of a weight and it is abdominal. sent13: if a non-top-down thing is a kind of a isometry then the starch is not a miotic. sent14: something is miotic if the fact that it is not a isometry and is not a miotic is not correct. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not anadromous and it is difficult is not right then the sugar is not difficult. sent16: something that is not a weight is not Atlantic or abdominal or both. sent17: that something is a convert and it is hircine is not false if it does not swim solicitude. sent18: that the starch is not a whitebait and is a kind of a weight does not hold if the signor is a miotic. sent19: the fact that the elm is not anadromous and is difficult is false. sent20: the fact that the test is top-down is correct if the fact that the fact that the fact that the bohrium does not emblazon and is not recombinant is not false is not right is correct. sent21: the accumulation does not supple signor and is non-hydric if it is not a Atlantic. sent22: something is not top-down. sent23: the accumulation is not a Atlantic. sent24: if the oilman does not swim solicitude the bohrium does not swim solicitude. sent25: if there exists something such that it is non-miotic a weight the cockchafer is a whitebait. sent26: that the signor is not a isometry and is not miotic does not hold if there exists something such that it is top-down. sent27: the starch is a kind of an abdominal if the accumulation is not hydric.
sent21 & sent23 -> int1: the accumulation does not supple signor and it is not hydric.; int1 -> int2: the accumulation is not hydric.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the starch is both a weight and an abdominal.; int3 -> int4: that the starch is a weight hold.; sent11 & sent13 -> int5: the starch is not a miotic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the starch is not a miotic but it is a weight.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a miotic and it is a kind of a weight.; int7 & sent25 -> int8: the cockchafer is a whitebait.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cockchafer does not care and does not pair accumulation does not hold.
sent10 -> int9: if the cockchafer is not a Atlantic then the fact that it is not a care and does not pair accumulation is false.; sent16 -> int10: the accumulation is not Atlantic and/or it is an abdominal if it is not a weight.; sent14 -> int11: the signor is a miotic if that it is not a isometry and it is not a kind of a miotic does not hold.; sent6 -> int12: if the bohrium does convert then the fact that it does not emblazon and is not a recombinant is false.; sent17 -> int13: if the bohrium does not swim solicitude then it does convert and is hircine.; sent19 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is not anadromous and is difficult is not correct.; int14 & sent15 -> int15: the sugar is non-difficult.; int15 -> int16: there are non-difficult things.; int16 & sent4 -> int17: either the canecutter is not a nationalization or it is not a kind of a Mormon or both.; sent2 & int17 -> int18: the oilman does not swim solicitude.; sent24 & int18 -> int19: the bohrium does not swim solicitude.; int13 & int19 -> int20: the bohrium converts and it is hircine.; int20 -> int21: the bohrium is a convert.; int12 & int21 -> int22: the fact that the bohrium does not emblazon and it is not recombinant does not hold.; sent20 & int22 -> int23: the test is top-down.; int23 -> int24: there exists something such that it is top-down.; int24 & sent26 -> int25: the fact that the signor is not a kind of a isometry and is not miotic does not hold.; int11 & int25 -> int26: the signor is a kind of a miotic.; sent18 & int26 -> int27: that the starch is both not a whitebait and a weight is incorrect.; int27 -> int28: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a whitebait and is a kind of a weight is not true.; int28 & sent9 -> int29: the accumulation is not a weight.; int10 & int29 -> int30: the fact that the accumulation is non-Atlantic or it is an abdominal or both hold.; int30 -> int31: there is something such that either it is not a kind of a Atlantic or it is an abdominal or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the cockchafer is not a care and it does not pair accumulation. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the cockchafer is a whitebait is correct it does not pair accumulation. sent2: the oilman does not swim solicitude if the canecutter is not a nationalization and/or it is not a Mormon. sent3: the starch is an abdominal. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not difficult then the canecutter is not a nationalization and/or it is not a kind of a Mormon. sent5: there are non-miotic things. sent6: if something converts then the fact that it does not emblazon and it is not a kind of a recombinant is false. sent7: if the cockchafer is a kind of a whitebait then it does not care and it does not pair accumulation. sent8: there is something such that it is a kind of miotic thing that is a weight. sent9: if there is something such that that it is both not a whitebait and a weight does not hold then the accumulation is not a kind of a weight. sent10: if something is not a Atlantic then the fact that it does not care and it does not pair accumulation is wrong. sent11: there is something such that it is both not top-down and a isometry. sent12: if the accumulation is not hydric then the starch is a kind of a weight and it is abdominal. sent13: if a non-top-down thing is a kind of a isometry then the starch is not a miotic. sent14: something is miotic if the fact that it is not a isometry and is not a miotic is not correct. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not anadromous and it is difficult is not right then the sugar is not difficult. sent16: something that is not a weight is not Atlantic or abdominal or both. sent17: that something is a convert and it is hircine is not false if it does not swim solicitude. sent18: that the starch is not a whitebait and is a kind of a weight does not hold if the signor is a miotic. sent19: the fact that the elm is not anadromous and is difficult is false. sent20: the fact that the test is top-down is correct if the fact that the fact that the fact that the bohrium does not emblazon and is not recombinant is not false is not right is correct. sent21: the accumulation does not supple signor and is non-hydric if it is not a Atlantic. sent22: something is not top-down. sent23: the accumulation is not a Atlantic. sent24: if the oilman does not swim solicitude the bohrium does not swim solicitude. sent25: if there exists something such that it is non-miotic a weight the cockchafer is a whitebait. sent26: that the signor is not a isometry and is not miotic does not hold if there exists something such that it is top-down. sent27: the starch is a kind of an abdominal if the accumulation is not hydric. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent23 -> int1: the accumulation does not supple signor and it is not hydric.; int1 -> int2: the accumulation is not hydric.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the starch is both a weight and an abdominal.; int3 -> int4: that the starch is a weight hold.; sent11 & sent13 -> int5: the starch is not a miotic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the starch is not a miotic but it is a weight.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a miotic and it is a kind of a weight.; int7 & sent25 -> int8: the cockchafer is a whitebait.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__