the abortus does not stave shoot but it is a kind of a folding.
sent1: the peregrine is Delphic. sent2: the abortus does fold and does stave tolazoline. sent3: if the peregrine is Delphic then the portfolio is abomasal. sent4: if the vinification does stave clavier the fact that the fact that either the intruder does not stave clavier or it is not polydactyl or both does not hold hold. sent5: if something does not stave clavier then that it does not stave shoot and does fold is not right. sent6: the portfolio staves hundredth if the peregrine blacklists Corvidae and does not staves hundredth. sent7: the vinification staves clavier if the abortus does stave shoot. sent8: the peregrine blacklists Corvidae but it does not stave hundredth. sent9: that the intruder staves tolazoline but it is not identical does not hold if the portfolio staves hundredth. sent10: the portfolio is not abomasal if there exists something such that that it does not stave clavier and/or is non-polydactyl is not correct. sent11: something is not abomasal and it is not polydactyl if it is Delphic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abortus staves shoot.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the vinification staves clavier.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the intruder does not stave clavier and/or it is not polydactyl is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not stave clavier and/or it is non-polydactyl does not hold.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the portfolio is not abomasal.; sent3 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the portfolio is not non-abomasal hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the abortus does not stave shoot.; sent2 -> int8: the abortus is a folding.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the abortus does not stave shoot but it is a folding is incorrect.
sent5 -> int9: if the abortus does not stave clavier then that it does not stave shoot and is a folding does not hold.; sent11 -> int10: if the vinification is Delphic it is not abomasal and not polydactyl.; sent6 & sent8 -> int11: the portfolio staves hundredth.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the intruder does stave tolazoline and is not identical is incorrect.; int12 -> int13: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does stave tolazoline and is not identical is not correct is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the abortus does not stave shoot but it is a kind of a folding. ; $context$ = sent1: the peregrine is Delphic. sent2: the abortus does fold and does stave tolazoline. sent3: if the peregrine is Delphic then the portfolio is abomasal. sent4: if the vinification does stave clavier the fact that the fact that either the intruder does not stave clavier or it is not polydactyl or both does not hold hold. sent5: if something does not stave clavier then that it does not stave shoot and does fold is not right. sent6: the portfolio staves hundredth if the peregrine blacklists Corvidae and does not staves hundredth. sent7: the vinification staves clavier if the abortus does stave shoot. sent8: the peregrine blacklists Corvidae but it does not stave hundredth. sent9: that the intruder staves tolazoline but it is not identical does not hold if the portfolio staves hundredth. sent10: the portfolio is not abomasal if there exists something such that that it does not stave clavier and/or is non-polydactyl is not correct. sent11: something is not abomasal and it is not polydactyl if it is Delphic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abortus staves shoot.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the vinification staves clavier.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the intruder does not stave clavier and/or it is not polydactyl is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not stave clavier and/or it is non-polydactyl does not hold.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the portfolio is not abomasal.; sent3 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the portfolio is not non-abomasal hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the abortus does not stave shoot.; sent2 -> int8: the abortus is a folding.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__