there exists something such that if it is an appraisal then it does not smite leaker or it dreams border or both.
sent1: the fact that either the tribesman is not a boy or it is a warm-up or both is not true. sent2: either the Peacemaker smites leaker or it does dream border or both if it is an appraisal. sent3: that the sensationalist is not a weatherman is true. sent4: if that the Peacemaker does not smite leaker and/or it dreams border is not correct that it is not an appraisal is correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an appraisal then it either does smite leaker or dreams border or both. sent6: either the Peacemaker is not an appraisal or it is pedunculate or both. sent7: if the fact that either the Peacemaker does not smite leaker or it dreams border or both is not true it is an appraisal. sent8: everything is a geoduck. sent9: that the Peacemaker is not chondritic or it whistles health or both does not hold. sent10: the Peacemaker does not dream border and/or it is restful. sent11: the Peacemaker is not an appraisal if the fact that either it does smite leaker or it does dream border or both is not true. sent12: the ossuary is not paleolithic or is a kind of a chair or both. sent13: if something is a geoduck then it is not scholastic and smites sensationalist. sent14: there exists something such that if it does fib then it is not polydactyl and/or it is unconscientious. sent15: the Peacemaker is not an appraisal if it either does not smite leaker or dreams border or both. sent16: if the Peacemaker is not a kind of an appraisal and is not a kind of a sporangiophore the apparel is not impressive. sent17: the fact that something does not smite leaker and/or it is a weatherman is not right if it is not impressive. sent18: the Peacemaker does not dream border. sent19: that the Peacemaker is a parterre is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Peacemaker either does not smite leaker or dreams border or both is incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Peacemaker is not an appraisal.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Peacemaker is an appraisal.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Peacemaker does not smite leaker or it does dream border or both.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Peacemaker does not smite leaker and/or dreams border if it is an appraisal.; int4 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the apparel does not smite leaker and/or it is a weatherman is right is wrong.
sent17 -> int5: that the apparel does not smite leaker and/or it is a weatherman is incorrect if it is not impressive.; sent8 -> int6: the corer is a geoduck.; sent13 -> int7: if the corer is a geoduck it is non-scholastic and it smites sensationalist.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the corer is not scholastic but it does smite sensationalist.; int8 -> int9: the corer is not scholastic.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is an appraisal then it does not smite leaker or it dreams border or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that either the tribesman is not a boy or it is a warm-up or both is not true. sent2: either the Peacemaker smites leaker or it does dream border or both if it is an appraisal. sent3: that the sensationalist is not a weatherman is true. sent4: if that the Peacemaker does not smite leaker and/or it dreams border is not correct that it is not an appraisal is correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an appraisal then it either does smite leaker or dreams border or both. sent6: either the Peacemaker is not an appraisal or it is pedunculate or both. sent7: if the fact that either the Peacemaker does not smite leaker or it dreams border or both is not true it is an appraisal. sent8: everything is a geoduck. sent9: that the Peacemaker is not chondritic or it whistles health or both does not hold. sent10: the Peacemaker does not dream border and/or it is restful. sent11: the Peacemaker is not an appraisal if the fact that either it does smite leaker or it does dream border or both is not true. sent12: the ossuary is not paleolithic or is a kind of a chair or both. sent13: if something is a geoduck then it is not scholastic and smites sensationalist. sent14: there exists something such that if it does fib then it is not polydactyl and/or it is unconscientious. sent15: the Peacemaker is not an appraisal if it either does not smite leaker or dreams border or both. sent16: if the Peacemaker is not a kind of an appraisal and is not a kind of a sporangiophore the apparel is not impressive. sent17: the fact that something does not smite leaker and/or it is a weatherman is not right if it is not impressive. sent18: the Peacemaker does not dream border. sent19: that the Peacemaker is a parterre is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Peacemaker either does not smite leaker or dreams border or both is incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Peacemaker is not an appraisal.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Peacemaker is an appraisal.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Peacemaker does not smite leaker or it does dream border or both.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Peacemaker does not smite leaker and/or dreams border if it is an appraisal.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__