the reconnaissance but not the masking words occurs.
sent1: the reconnaissance and the embrowning firelight occurs. sent2: that the quickie happens and the jamming reissue happens causes that the masking words does not occur. sent3: the fact that the jamming piedmont occurs is false if that that the jamming piedmont occurs and the verdict happens is not false is not right. sent4: that the quickie does not occur or that the embrowning firelight does not occur or both leads to that the quickie does not occur. sent5: the embrowning firelight occurs. sent6: the fact that the embrowning Elbe does not occur but the prepositionalness happens does not hold if the moving does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the embrowning Elbe does not occur but the prepositionalness happens is incorrect the jamming reissue does not occur. sent8: the jamming reissue happens. sent9: that the jamming piedmont does not occur causes that the siege but not the moving occurs. sent10: the quickie happens. sent11: if the quickie does not occur then that the reconnaissance occurs and the masking words does not occur is false.
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the quickie occurs and the jamming reissue occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the masking words does not occur.; sent1 -> int3: the reconnaissance occurs.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the reconnaissance happens and the masking words does not occur is incorrect is right.
$hypothesis$ = the reconnaissance but not the masking words occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the reconnaissance and the embrowning firelight occurs. sent2: that the quickie happens and the jamming reissue happens causes that the masking words does not occur. sent3: the fact that the jamming piedmont occurs is false if that that the jamming piedmont occurs and the verdict happens is not false is not right. sent4: that the quickie does not occur or that the embrowning firelight does not occur or both leads to that the quickie does not occur. sent5: the embrowning firelight occurs. sent6: the fact that the embrowning Elbe does not occur but the prepositionalness happens does not hold if the moving does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the embrowning Elbe does not occur but the prepositionalness happens is incorrect the jamming reissue does not occur. sent8: the jamming reissue happens. sent9: that the jamming piedmont does not occur causes that the siege but not the moving occurs. sent10: the quickie happens. sent11: if the quickie does not occur then that the reconnaissance occurs and the masking words does not occur is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the quickie occurs and the jamming reissue occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the masking words does not occur.; sent1 -> int3: the reconnaissance occurs.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__