the Fauve is not Bulgarian.
sent1: if something toasts it is macroeconomic. sent2: there exists something such that that it impairs Pseudobombax and/or it is a savory is not false. sent3: if the carousel is not determinable that it deplores yellowfin and/or it is not apicultural hold. sent4: the fact that the carousel is not determinable is correct. sent5: something does toast if that it is not measurable and it is a kind of a jab is incorrect. sent6: the jaggery is a kind of a lagoon if the illuminant is macroeconomic. sent7: the fact that either the jaggery impairs Pseudobombax or it is a savory or both is wrong if it is not a knobkerrie. sent8: there is something such that it is not a savory. sent9: the illuminant is conductive. sent10: something is a troublesomeness if it does impair lagomorph. sent11: the vacancy is a POB if the carousel deplores yellowfin. sent12: if the jaggery is not a knobkerrie then it is not a savory. sent13: if the Fauve is not a lagoon the jaggery is Bulgarian and it does deplore subscription. sent14: something is not a savory if that it is a kind of a knobkerrie and it is a kind of a savory is incorrect. sent15: the illuminant impairs lagomorph if it is conductive. sent16: there exists something such that it does not impair Pseudobombax. sent17: the fact that something does not deplore subscription hold if it is both a lagoon and not loyal. sent18: the vacancy is a kind of a POB if the carousel is not apicultural. sent19: the Fauve is Bulgarian thing that is a knobkerrie if the jaggery does not deplore subscription. sent20: the jaggery is not savory. sent21: that something is immeasurable thing that does jab is wrong if it is a kind of a troublesomeness. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that it does impair Pseudobombax or it is a kind of a savory or both does not hold the Fauve is non-Bulgarian.
the philologist is not a savory.
sent14 -> int1: if that the philologist is a knobkerrie and it is savory is wrong then the fact that it is not a savory is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the Fauve is not Bulgarian. ; $context$ = sent1: if something toasts it is macroeconomic. sent2: there exists something such that that it impairs Pseudobombax and/or it is a savory is not false. sent3: if the carousel is not determinable that it deplores yellowfin and/or it is not apicultural hold. sent4: the fact that the carousel is not determinable is correct. sent5: something does toast if that it is not measurable and it is a kind of a jab is incorrect. sent6: the jaggery is a kind of a lagoon if the illuminant is macroeconomic. sent7: the fact that either the jaggery impairs Pseudobombax or it is a savory or both is wrong if it is not a knobkerrie. sent8: there is something such that it is not a savory. sent9: the illuminant is conductive. sent10: something is a troublesomeness if it does impair lagomorph. sent11: the vacancy is a POB if the carousel deplores yellowfin. sent12: if the jaggery is not a knobkerrie then it is not a savory. sent13: if the Fauve is not a lagoon the jaggery is Bulgarian and it does deplore subscription. sent14: something is not a savory if that it is a kind of a knobkerrie and it is a kind of a savory is incorrect. sent15: the illuminant impairs lagomorph if it is conductive. sent16: there exists something such that it does not impair Pseudobombax. sent17: the fact that something does not deplore subscription hold if it is both a lagoon and not loyal. sent18: the vacancy is a kind of a POB if the carousel is not apicultural. sent19: the Fauve is Bulgarian thing that is a knobkerrie if the jaggery does not deplore subscription. sent20: the jaggery is not savory. sent21: that something is immeasurable thing that does jab is wrong if it is a kind of a troublesomeness. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that it does impair Pseudobombax or it is a kind of a savory or both does not hold the Fauve is non-Bulgarian. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__