that the baronet is not aggressive is not false.
sent1: something sentimentalises soundtrack if it is a Brother. sent2: something is not aggressive if the fact that it is not a one-dimensionality and does rationalize aqualung does not hold. sent3: if the aconite does not abhor it is a Brother and it rationalizes Spitsbergen. sent4: the baronet does sentimentalise soundtrack if the aconite does sentimentalise soundtrack. sent5: if something sentimentalises soundtrack it is aggressive. sent6: there exists nothing such that it is not a one-dimensionality and does rationalize aqualung.
sent6 -> int1: that the baronet is not a kind of a one-dimensionality and does rationalize aqualung does not hold.; sent2 -> int2: if the fact that the baronet is not a one-dimensionality and rationalizes aqualung is not true it is not aggressive.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the baronet is aggressive.
sent5 -> int3: the baronet is aggressive if it does sentimentalise soundtrack.; sent1 -> int4: if that the aconite is a Brother is not false it sentimentalises soundtrack.;
$hypothesis$ = that the baronet is not aggressive is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something sentimentalises soundtrack if it is a Brother. sent2: something is not aggressive if the fact that it is not a one-dimensionality and does rationalize aqualung does not hold. sent3: if the aconite does not abhor it is a Brother and it rationalizes Spitsbergen. sent4: the baronet does sentimentalise soundtrack if the aconite does sentimentalise soundtrack. sent5: if something sentimentalises soundtrack it is aggressive. sent6: there exists nothing such that it is not a one-dimensionality and does rationalize aqualung. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: that the baronet is not a kind of a one-dimensionality and does rationalize aqualung does not hold.; sent2 -> int2: if the fact that the baronet is not a one-dimensionality and rationalizes aqualung is not true it is not aggressive.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__