the disobeying Spitsbergen does not occur.
sent1: the disobeying transferer does not occur or the parching spareribs occurs or both if the hymenopterousness does not occur. sent2: if that the say-so does not occur or the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur or both is not correct the immunodeficientness does not occur. sent3: that the intenseness does not occur brings about that the hymenopterousness does not occur and the whining does not occur. sent4: the disobeying transferer occurs. sent5: the fact that both the disobeying Spitsbergen and the say-so happens is not correct if the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur. sent6: the glaring does not occur but the disobeying Spitsbergen happens if that the immunodeficientness does not occur is not false. sent7: the calibration does not occur if the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur. sent8: if the say-so does not occur the fact that the calibration occurs hold. sent9: the disobeying Spitsbergen does not occur if that the disobeying Spitsbergen occurs and the say-so happens is not correct. sent10: the say-so happens but the parching faience does not occur if the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur. sent11: that the disobeying transferer does not occur results in that both the immunodeficientness and the glaring occurs. sent12: that either the disobeying transferer does not occur or the parching spareribs occurs or both prevents that the disobeying transferer occurs. sent13: if the say-so does not occur then the calibration does not occur. sent14: the non-immunodeficientness prevents that the glare happens. sent15: if that the disobeying transferer happens is correct then the calibration happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the say-so does not occur or the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent13 & sent7 -> int1: the calibration does not occur.; sent15 & sent4 -> int2: the calibration happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the say-so does not occur and/or the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur is not right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the immunodeficientness does not occur hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the glare does not occur and the disobeying Spitsbergen happens.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the disobeying Spitsbergen does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the disobeying Spitsbergen does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the disobeying transferer does not occur or the parching spareribs occurs or both if the hymenopterousness does not occur. sent2: if that the say-so does not occur or the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur or both is not correct the immunodeficientness does not occur. sent3: that the intenseness does not occur brings about that the hymenopterousness does not occur and the whining does not occur. sent4: the disobeying transferer occurs. sent5: the fact that both the disobeying Spitsbergen and the say-so happens is not correct if the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur. sent6: the glaring does not occur but the disobeying Spitsbergen happens if that the immunodeficientness does not occur is not false. sent7: the calibration does not occur if the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur. sent8: if the say-so does not occur the fact that the calibration occurs hold. sent9: the disobeying Spitsbergen does not occur if that the disobeying Spitsbergen occurs and the say-so happens is not correct. sent10: the say-so happens but the parching faience does not occur if the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur. sent11: that the disobeying transferer does not occur results in that both the immunodeficientness and the glaring occurs. sent12: that either the disobeying transferer does not occur or the parching spareribs occurs or both prevents that the disobeying transferer occurs. sent13: if the say-so does not occur then the calibration does not occur. sent14: the non-immunodeficientness prevents that the glare happens. sent15: if that the disobeying transferer happens is correct then the calibration happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the say-so does not occur or the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent13 & sent7 -> int1: the calibration does not occur.; sent15 & sent4 -> int2: the calibration happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the say-so does not occur and/or the disobeying Porphyrio does not occur is not right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the immunodeficientness does not occur hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the glare does not occur and the disobeying Spitsbergen happens.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__