there exists something such that if it is not a antonym then it is nonintellectual thing that briefs illness.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a antonym then it is nonintellectual and it briefs illness. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a antonym it is nonintellectual. sent3: if the vower is not a antonym then it is nonintellectual and it does brief illness. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a antonym it does brief illness. sent5: if something is not nonintellectual it is Ceylonese and it does impinge covariance.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the vower is not nonintellectual then it is Ceylonese and it does impinge covariance.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a antonym then it is nonintellectual thing that briefs illness. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a antonym then it is nonintellectual and it briefs illness. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a antonym it is nonintellectual. sent3: if the vower is not a antonym then it is nonintellectual and it does brief illness. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a antonym it does brief illness. sent5: if something is not nonintellectual it is Ceylonese and it does impinge covariance. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__