the sighting happens and the saccadicness occurs.
sent1: that the strafe happens is right. sent2: that the ungualness does not occur hold if not the preventiveness but the substantialness occurs. sent3: if the strafe occurs the ungualness happens. sent4: if the strafe does not occur that the fact that the sighting occurs and the saccadicness occurs is not false is not right. sent5: the Donneanness occurs. sent6: the sighting occurs if the retrogradeness does not occur. sent7: that the nursing does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: that the ungualness and the retrogradeness happens brings about the non-substantialness. sent9: both the saccadicness and the infernal happens.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the ungualness occurs is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retrogradeness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ungualness happens and the retrograding occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the substantialness does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: the saccadicness happens.;
that the fact that the sighting happens and the saccadicness happens is not incorrect does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the sighting happens and the saccadicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the strafe happens is right. sent2: that the ungualness does not occur hold if not the preventiveness but the substantialness occurs. sent3: if the strafe occurs the ungualness happens. sent4: if the strafe does not occur that the fact that the sighting occurs and the saccadicness occurs is not false is not right. sent5: the Donneanness occurs. sent6: the sighting occurs if the retrogradeness does not occur. sent7: that the nursing does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: that the ungualness and the retrogradeness happens brings about the non-substantialness. sent9: both the saccadicness and the infernal happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the ungualness occurs is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retrogradeness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ungualness happens and the retrograding occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the substantialness does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: the saccadicness happens.; __UNKNOWN__