the fact that the ergotamine is both evaporative and some does not hold.
sent1: the joiner is not evaporative if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Pitot and/or is some. sent2: if the fact that the polyelectrolyte outstares ergotamine and outstares brocaded is wrong the ergotamine does not restrain dideoxycytosine. sent3: that something is evaporative and it is some is false if it is not a kind of a crapshooter. sent4: the fact that that the ergotamine is utopian and it is a crapshooter is right does not hold if something is not evaporative. sent5: if that the fact that the joiner does restrain Mitchum but it is not a cellularity is not correct is not wrong the fact that it does not restrain Mitchum is not wrong. sent6: the dideoxycytosine is not a crapshooter. sent7: the indusium is not harmful and is some if there is something such that it does not restrain dideoxycytosine. sent8: the ergotamine is some if the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative. sent9: that something is utopian but it is not a seventeenth is not true if it is not a kind of a crapshooter. sent10: if the fact that something is not a Pitot but it is harmful is false it is not a crapshooter. sent11: if the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative the ergotamine is evaporative and it is some. sent12: if the indusium does not surmise sesame then the fact that the joiner does restrain Mitchum and is not a kind of a cellularity is not right. sent13: the dideoxycytosine is evaporative if the ergotamine is not a kind of a seventeenth. sent14: if the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative that it is a crapshooter and it is a kind of a seventeenth is incorrect. sent15: the sesame does not restrain dideoxycytosine. sent16: the polyelectrolyte is not utopian if there exists something such that that it is utopian and is a crapshooter does not hold. sent17: if the fact that the dideoxycytosine is utopian but not a seventeenth does not hold then that the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative is true. sent18: that something is both not a Pitot and harmful does not hold if it does not restrain dideoxycytosine.
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the dideoxycytosine is utopian thing that is not the seventeenth does not hold if the dideoxycytosine is not a crapshooter is correct.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the dideoxycytosine is utopian but it is not a kind of a seventeenth is wrong.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative is right.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the ergotamine is both not non-evaporative and some does not hold.
sent3 -> int4: if that the ergotamine is not a crapshooter hold that it is evaporative and it is some is incorrect.; sent10 -> int5: the ergotamine is not a crapshooter if the fact that it is not a Pitot and is harmful is not right.; sent18 -> int6: that the fact that the ergotamine is not a kind of a Pitot and is harmful is false is not false if that it does not restrain dideoxycytosine hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ergotamine is both evaporative and some does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the joiner is not evaporative if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Pitot and/or is some. sent2: if the fact that the polyelectrolyte outstares ergotamine and outstares brocaded is wrong the ergotamine does not restrain dideoxycytosine. sent3: that something is evaporative and it is some is false if it is not a kind of a crapshooter. sent4: the fact that that the ergotamine is utopian and it is a crapshooter is right does not hold if something is not evaporative. sent5: if that the fact that the joiner does restrain Mitchum but it is not a cellularity is not correct is not wrong the fact that it does not restrain Mitchum is not wrong. sent6: the dideoxycytosine is not a crapshooter. sent7: the indusium is not harmful and is some if there is something such that it does not restrain dideoxycytosine. sent8: the ergotamine is some if the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative. sent9: that something is utopian but it is not a seventeenth is not true if it is not a kind of a crapshooter. sent10: if the fact that something is not a Pitot but it is harmful is false it is not a crapshooter. sent11: if the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative the ergotamine is evaporative and it is some. sent12: if the indusium does not surmise sesame then the fact that the joiner does restrain Mitchum and is not a kind of a cellularity is not right. sent13: the dideoxycytosine is evaporative if the ergotamine is not a kind of a seventeenth. sent14: if the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative that it is a crapshooter and it is a kind of a seventeenth is incorrect. sent15: the sesame does not restrain dideoxycytosine. sent16: the polyelectrolyte is not utopian if there exists something such that that it is utopian and is a crapshooter does not hold. sent17: if the fact that the dideoxycytosine is utopian but not a seventeenth does not hold then that the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative is true. sent18: that something is both not a Pitot and harmful does not hold if it does not restrain dideoxycytosine. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the dideoxycytosine is utopian thing that is not the seventeenth does not hold if the dideoxycytosine is not a crapshooter is correct.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the dideoxycytosine is utopian but it is not a kind of a seventeenth is wrong.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the polyelectrolyte is not evaporative is right.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__