that there is something such that if it is not vibrionic and it is a marc then it is pilosebaceous is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it does intrigue tread-softly and it does scale Aesculapius it is a Ephesian. sent2: the hydrometer is pilosebaceous if that it is not a cryptanalyst and it does scale annihilator is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it is vibrionic and it is a kind of a marc then it is pilosebaceous. sent4: if something is not vibrionic and is a marc it is pilosebaceous.
sent4 -> int1: that the hydrometer is pilosebaceous is correct if it is a kind of non-vibrionic thing that is a marc.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not vibrionic and it is a marc then it is pilosebaceous is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does intrigue tread-softly and it does scale Aesculapius it is a Ephesian. sent2: the hydrometer is pilosebaceous if that it is not a cryptanalyst and it does scale annihilator is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it is vibrionic and it is a kind of a marc then it is pilosebaceous. sent4: if something is not vibrionic and is a marc it is pilosebaceous. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the hydrometer is pilosebaceous is correct if it is a kind of non-vibrionic thing that is a marc.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__