the summoning does not occur.
sent1: the retaining does not occur. sent2: that the bivariateness happens is true. sent3: not the patience but the might-have-been occurs. sent4: the summoning does not occur if the calcicolousness does not occur. sent5: the glorification does not occur if the assuming iguanodon does not occur. sent6: the testifying mutineer occurs. sent7: the once-over happens. sent8: the white does not occur. sent9: the dishonorableness happens. sent10: the climax does not occur. sent11: that the spending Ummah does not occur is caused by that the helpdesk does not occur. sent12: the spending exhortation occurs. sent13: that the pulsation does not occur prevents that the otherness does not occur. sent14: the clitoralness and the practicalness occurs. sent15: the altruisticness does not occur. sent16: the fact that the summoning does not occur and the retaining does not occur is not true if the anacliticness happens. sent17: if the fact that the summoning does not occur and the retaining does not occur is not correct the summoning occurs. sent18: that the anacliticness occurs is prevented by that the retaining does not occur. sent19: if both the non-anacliticness and the pulsation happens the testifying mutineer does not occur.
sent18 & sent1 -> int1: the anacliticness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pulsation occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the non-anacliticness and the pulsation happens.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the testifying mutineer does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the pulsation does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the otherness occurs.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: both the otherness and the spending exhortation happens.;
the summoning happens.
$hypothesis$ = the summoning does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the retaining does not occur. sent2: that the bivariateness happens is true. sent3: not the patience but the might-have-been occurs. sent4: the summoning does not occur if the calcicolousness does not occur. sent5: the glorification does not occur if the assuming iguanodon does not occur. sent6: the testifying mutineer occurs. sent7: the once-over happens. sent8: the white does not occur. sent9: the dishonorableness happens. sent10: the climax does not occur. sent11: that the spending Ummah does not occur is caused by that the helpdesk does not occur. sent12: the spending exhortation occurs. sent13: that the pulsation does not occur prevents that the otherness does not occur. sent14: the clitoralness and the practicalness occurs. sent15: the altruisticness does not occur. sent16: the fact that the summoning does not occur and the retaining does not occur is not true if the anacliticness happens. sent17: if the fact that the summoning does not occur and the retaining does not occur is not correct the summoning occurs. sent18: that the anacliticness occurs is prevented by that the retaining does not occur. sent19: if both the non-anacliticness and the pulsation happens the testifying mutineer does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent1 -> int1: the anacliticness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pulsation occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the non-anacliticness and the pulsation happens.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the testifying mutineer does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the pulsation does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the otherness occurs.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: both the otherness and the spending exhortation happens.; __UNKNOWN__