the laryngectomy does not occur.
sent1: the sneering hydrosphere occurs. sent2: the embracing does not occur. sent3: the planktonicness happens if the sneering piloting does not occur. sent4: the clinking Sargent occurs if that the conscientiousness occurs is not wrong. sent5: if the sneering piloting happens then the laryngectomy occurs. sent6: if the anoxemicness occurs the complication happens. sent7: that the sneering piloting does not occur yields that the unionizing ratel and the planktonicness occurs. sent8: the embracing does not occur and the takeaway does not occur. sent9: the non-gastronomicness is prevented by that the stone happens. sent10: that both the non-chaffyness and the bipedalness happens is not true. sent11: that the fact that not the anoxemicness but the chaffiness occurs does not hold is not incorrect if the disinfection occurs. sent12: not the tort but the oblate happens. sent13: the planktonicness occurs. sent14: the incurvation happens. sent15: if the incurvation happens that the takeaway does not occur but the clinking Sargent happens is wrong. sent16: the thrashing occurs if the fact that not the thrashing but the conscientiousness occurs is not true. sent17: if the takeaway occurs then the fact that the thrash does not occur but the conscientiousness happens is incorrect. sent18: the unionizing ratel causes the conscientiousness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sneering piloting does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: both the unionizing ratel and the planktonicness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the unionizing ratel happens.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the conscientiousness occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the clinking Sargent happens.; sent8 -> int5: the takeaway does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the takeaway but the clinking Sargent happens.; sent15 & sent14 -> int7: that the takeaway does not occur but the clinking Sargent occurs is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the sneering piloting happens.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the thrashing happens and the electrotherapy occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the laryngectomy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the sneering hydrosphere occurs. sent2: the embracing does not occur. sent3: the planktonicness happens if the sneering piloting does not occur. sent4: the clinking Sargent occurs if that the conscientiousness occurs is not wrong. sent5: if the sneering piloting happens then the laryngectomy occurs. sent6: if the anoxemicness occurs the complication happens. sent7: that the sneering piloting does not occur yields that the unionizing ratel and the planktonicness occurs. sent8: the embracing does not occur and the takeaway does not occur. sent9: the non-gastronomicness is prevented by that the stone happens. sent10: that both the non-chaffyness and the bipedalness happens is not true. sent11: that the fact that not the anoxemicness but the chaffiness occurs does not hold is not incorrect if the disinfection occurs. sent12: not the tort but the oblate happens. sent13: the planktonicness occurs. sent14: the incurvation happens. sent15: if the incurvation happens that the takeaway does not occur but the clinking Sargent happens is wrong. sent16: the thrashing occurs if the fact that not the thrashing but the conscientiousness occurs is not true. sent17: if the takeaway occurs then the fact that the thrash does not occur but the conscientiousness happens is incorrect. sent18: the unionizing ratel causes the conscientiousness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sneering piloting does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: both the unionizing ratel and the planktonicness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the unionizing ratel happens.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the conscientiousness occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the clinking Sargent happens.; sent8 -> int5: the takeaway does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the takeaway but the clinking Sargent happens.; sent15 & sent14 -> int7: that the takeaway does not occur but the clinking Sargent occurs is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the sneering piloting happens.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__