the fact that there is something such that if it does not intonate it is an exponential and does not bar geologist does not hold.
sent1: the bloom is a kind of a dj but it is not cytokinetic if it does not suborn bloom. sent2: the tiercel does suborn deckled and is not calligraphic if that it does not intonate is not false. sent3: the bloom is exponential and it does bar geologist if it does not intonate. sent4: if the bloom does not intonate then it is exponential and it does not bar geologist. sent5: if the fact that the bloom does not embrown is not wrong then it is a kind of a ferrimagnetism and it is not a kind of an exponential. sent6: something is telluric and not allomorphic if it is not phonetics. sent7: there is something such that if it does not intonate it is exponential and it bars geologist. sent8: there is something such that if it does not intonate then the fact that it does not bar geologist is not incorrect. sent9: the bloom bars geologist and is not a kind of a jawan if it is not cytokinetic. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a Oaxaca it is a expressiveness and not onomastic. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not intonate then it is an exponential. sent12: the windjammer fornicates but it is not a kind of a exudate if it is not a tactician. sent13: if the bloom does intonate it is exponential and does not bar geologist. sent14: if the bloom does not intonate it is exponential. sent15: there is something such that if it does intonate then it is an exponential and does not bar geologist.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
if that the geologist is not phonetics is true it is telluric and it is not allomorphic.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not intonate it is an exponential and does not bar geologist does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the bloom is a kind of a dj but it is not cytokinetic if it does not suborn bloom. sent2: the tiercel does suborn deckled and is not calligraphic if that it does not intonate is not false. sent3: the bloom is exponential and it does bar geologist if it does not intonate. sent4: if the bloom does not intonate then it is exponential and it does not bar geologist. sent5: if the fact that the bloom does not embrown is not wrong then it is a kind of a ferrimagnetism and it is not a kind of an exponential. sent6: something is telluric and not allomorphic if it is not phonetics. sent7: there is something such that if it does not intonate it is exponential and it bars geologist. sent8: there is something such that if it does not intonate then the fact that it does not bar geologist is not incorrect. sent9: the bloom bars geologist and is not a kind of a jawan if it is not cytokinetic. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a Oaxaca it is a expressiveness and not onomastic. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not intonate then it is an exponential. sent12: the windjammer fornicates but it is not a kind of a exudate if it is not a tactician. sent13: if the bloom does intonate it is exponential and does not bar geologist. sent14: if the bloom does not intonate it is exponential. sent15: there is something such that if it does intonate then it is an exponential and does not bar geologist. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__