the halophyte orchestrates Ubykh.
sent1: the pacesetter is legible. sent2: if the rarity is pentangular and orchestrates Ubykh then it is not a coelostat. sent3: everything is a nephoscope and it is a snipefish. sent4: something does not hunger pacesetter if it is both a Sellotape and a licitness. sent5: the Mauser is a kind of a lory if the fact that it is not non-sympatric and is not pentangular does not hold. sent6: The Borodino does not orchestrate rarity. sent7: the rarity is carcinomatous thing that is a noisemaker. sent8: the fact that the pacesetter is not a kind of a ball and it is not a kind of a dronabinol is not right if the nonstarter does not orchestrate Borodino. sent9: if that the rarity does not orchestrate Borodino is not false then it is a kind of a licitness and is a ball. sent10: if the fact that the tripod orchestrates Borodino but it is not permeable is not correct the nonstarter does not orchestrates Borodino. sent11: if the rarity is permeable it orchestrates NUWC and does not orchestrate Borodino. sent12: the Mauser is not a dronabinol if there is something such that it does orchestrate NUWC and does not orchestrate Borodino. sent13: if something is both not a coelostat and not a dronabinol the halophyte hungers pacesetter. sent14: something is a coelostat if it does not hunger pacesetter. sent15: the Mauser is a kind of a snipefish and does ball. sent16: if the pacesetter does not hunger pacesetter then the rarity is a licitness or a coelostat or both. sent17: if the fact that the pacesetter is not a kind of a nephoscope and/or does not orchestrate Ubykh is not correct the Mauser orchestrate Ubykh. sent18: something orchestrates NUWC if it is a nephoscope. sent19: the rarity is a kind of a dronabinol if it is a kind of a coelostat. sent20: that the halophyte does not orchestrate Ubykh is not incorrect if the rarity is a kind of a dronabinol. sent21: the halophyte does burglarize Carlsbad and it is not non-pentangular. sent22: the rarity does not orchestrate Borodino. sent23: something is a kind of a licitness if the fact that it is a Sellotape that is not a lory is false. sent24: the fact that the Mauser is a kind of sympatric thing that is not pentangular does not hold. sent25: if the Mauser is a lory the rarity is a Sellotape. sent26: the fact that that the thurifer is a kind of the Suriname is not wrong if the thurifer is not a gun hold. sent27: the stripper is not a coelostat. sent28: if a ball does orchestrate Ubykh then it is not a coelostat. sent29: the fact that the fact that either the pacesetter is not a nephoscope or it does not orchestrate Ubykh or both is true does not hold if it is legible. sent30: the halophyte is a kind of a Sellotape that is a kind of a lory if the Mauser is not a licitness.
sent5 & sent24 -> int1: the Mauser is a lory.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the rarity is a Sellotape.; sent9 & sent22 -> int3: the rarity is a licitness and it is a ball.; int3 -> int4: that the rarity is a kind of a licitness hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the rarity is a Sellotape and it is a licitness.; sent4 -> int6: the rarity does not hunger pacesetter if it is a Sellotape and it is a kind of a licitness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the rarity does not hunger pacesetter.; sent14 -> int8: the rarity is a coelostat if it does not hunger pacesetter.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the rarity is a coelostat.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: the rarity is a dronabinol.; int10 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the halophyte does orchestrate Ubykh.
sent18 -> int11: if the Weld is a kind of a nephoscope then the fact that it does orchestrate NUWC is not false.; sent3 -> int12: the Weld is a nephoscope and a snipefish.; int12 -> int13: the Weld is a nephoscope.; int11 & int13 -> int14: that the Weld does orchestrate NUWC hold.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it does orchestrate NUWC.;
$hypothesis$ = the halophyte orchestrates Ubykh. ; $context$ = sent1: the pacesetter is legible. sent2: if the rarity is pentangular and orchestrates Ubykh then it is not a coelostat. sent3: everything is a nephoscope and it is a snipefish. sent4: something does not hunger pacesetter if it is both a Sellotape and a licitness. sent5: the Mauser is a kind of a lory if the fact that it is not non-sympatric and is not pentangular does not hold. sent6: The Borodino does not orchestrate rarity. sent7: the rarity is carcinomatous thing that is a noisemaker. sent8: the fact that the pacesetter is not a kind of a ball and it is not a kind of a dronabinol is not right if the nonstarter does not orchestrate Borodino. sent9: if that the rarity does not orchestrate Borodino is not false then it is a kind of a licitness and is a ball. sent10: if the fact that the tripod orchestrates Borodino but it is not permeable is not correct the nonstarter does not orchestrates Borodino. sent11: if the rarity is permeable it orchestrates NUWC and does not orchestrate Borodino. sent12: the Mauser is not a dronabinol if there is something such that it does orchestrate NUWC and does not orchestrate Borodino. sent13: if something is both not a coelostat and not a dronabinol the halophyte hungers pacesetter. sent14: something is a coelostat if it does not hunger pacesetter. sent15: the Mauser is a kind of a snipefish and does ball. sent16: if the pacesetter does not hunger pacesetter then the rarity is a licitness or a coelostat or both. sent17: if the fact that the pacesetter is not a kind of a nephoscope and/or does not orchestrate Ubykh is not correct the Mauser orchestrate Ubykh. sent18: something orchestrates NUWC if it is a nephoscope. sent19: the rarity is a kind of a dronabinol if it is a kind of a coelostat. sent20: that the halophyte does not orchestrate Ubykh is not incorrect if the rarity is a kind of a dronabinol. sent21: the halophyte does burglarize Carlsbad and it is not non-pentangular. sent22: the rarity does not orchestrate Borodino. sent23: something is a kind of a licitness if the fact that it is a Sellotape that is not a lory is false. sent24: the fact that the Mauser is a kind of sympatric thing that is not pentangular does not hold. sent25: if the Mauser is a lory the rarity is a Sellotape. sent26: the fact that that the thurifer is a kind of the Suriname is not wrong if the thurifer is not a gun hold. sent27: the stripper is not a coelostat. sent28: if a ball does orchestrate Ubykh then it is not a coelostat. sent29: the fact that the fact that either the pacesetter is not a nephoscope or it does not orchestrate Ubykh or both is true does not hold if it is legible. sent30: the halophyte is a kind of a Sellotape that is a kind of a lory if the Mauser is not a licitness. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent24 -> int1: the Mauser is a lory.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the rarity is a Sellotape.; sent9 & sent22 -> int3: the rarity is a licitness and it is a ball.; int3 -> int4: that the rarity is a kind of a licitness hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the rarity is a Sellotape and it is a licitness.; sent4 -> int6: the rarity does not hunger pacesetter if it is a Sellotape and it is a kind of a licitness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the rarity does not hunger pacesetter.; sent14 -> int8: the rarity is a coelostat if it does not hunger pacesetter.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the rarity is a coelostat.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: the rarity is a dronabinol.; int10 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__