the fact that the burnous is not a cull and it is not anaphoric is incorrect.
sent1: the stoic is anaphoric. sent2: the chloropicrin is not electromotive. sent3: the Sweet is not a cull if the supinator axes supinator. sent4: if the fact that something does axe supinator is not false then it does not ramble Mosaic. sent5: the chloropicrin is a kind of a tufted if the supinator axes supinator and it is an appropriation. sent6: the Kali does not cull if the supinator does ramble Mosaic and/or it is a kind of a tufted. sent7: that the burnous is both not a cull and not anaphoric is wrong if the fact that the Sweet does not cull hold. sent8: that the burnous is a cull and is not anaphoric is incorrect. sent9: if something rambles Mosaic or it is a kind of a tufted or both then it is not a servo. sent10: that the chloropicrin is not a tufted but it does axe RAF is wrong if the Sweet is a kind of a servo. sent11: if the fact that the chloropicrin does not ramble Mosaic is not true then it is not a servo. sent12: the chloropicrin is a servo that does axe RAF if it is not electromotive. sent13: the Sweet is not a cull if the fact that the supinator does not axe supinator but it is an appropriation does not hold. sent14: the burnous does not cull and is non-anaphoric if the supinator rambles Mosaic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the supinator does not axe supinator but it is an appropriation.; sent9 -> int1: the chloropicrin is not a servo if it does ramble Mosaic or it is a tufted or both.; sent12 & sent2 -> int2: the chloropicrin is a servo that does axe RAF.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the chloropicrin is a servo is not incorrect.;
the burnous is not a cull and not anaphoric.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the burnous is not a cull and it is not anaphoric is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the stoic is anaphoric. sent2: the chloropicrin is not electromotive. sent3: the Sweet is not a cull if the supinator axes supinator. sent4: if the fact that something does axe supinator is not false then it does not ramble Mosaic. sent5: the chloropicrin is a kind of a tufted if the supinator axes supinator and it is an appropriation. sent6: the Kali does not cull if the supinator does ramble Mosaic and/or it is a kind of a tufted. sent7: that the burnous is both not a cull and not anaphoric is wrong if the fact that the Sweet does not cull hold. sent8: that the burnous is a cull and is not anaphoric is incorrect. sent9: if something rambles Mosaic or it is a kind of a tufted or both then it is not a servo. sent10: that the chloropicrin is not a tufted but it does axe RAF is wrong if the Sweet is a kind of a servo. sent11: if the fact that the chloropicrin does not ramble Mosaic is not true then it is not a servo. sent12: the chloropicrin is a servo that does axe RAF if it is not electromotive. sent13: the Sweet is not a cull if the fact that the supinator does not axe supinator but it is an appropriation does not hold. sent14: the burnous does not cull and is non-anaphoric if the supinator rambles Mosaic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the supinator does not axe supinator but it is an appropriation.; sent9 -> int1: the chloropicrin is not a servo if it does ramble Mosaic or it is a tufted or both.; sent12 & sent2 -> int2: the chloropicrin is a servo that does axe RAF.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the chloropicrin is a servo is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__