the wear is not gastroesophageal and/or it is not a Weill.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a taxability and is not unclear is incorrect then the nainsook is not a Aum. sent2: that the wear either is not gastroesophageal or is not a Weill or both if the nainsook is not a Aum hold. sent3: if the fact that something is unclear is not false then that the nainsook is not a Aum is not false. sent4: that the savory is both a taxability and unclear does not hold if it does not impel specificity. sent5: The wear does shun mustache. sent6: that something is a kind of a antifeminist and is not Neanderthal is wrong if it is not a taxability. sent7: the wear is not gastroesophageal and/or is a Weill. sent8: if the savory is not unclear the fact that it shuns wear and is not gastroesophageal does not hold. sent9: something is a taxability and is not unclear. sent10: the mustache does shun wear. sent11: either the wear is gastroesophageal or it is not a kind of a Weill or both if the nainsook is not a Aum. sent12: the wear is gastroesophageal and/or it is not a kind of a Weill. sent13: the fact that something is a kind of a taxability that is not unclear does not hold if it does not impel specificity. sent14: the wear is either not gastroesophageal or a Weill or both if the nainsook is not a kind of a Aum. sent15: there is something such that that it is a taxability and it is unclear is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the savory is a taxability and it is not clear does not hold.
sent13 -> int1: if the savory does not impel specificity the fact that it is a kind of a taxability and is clear is not true.;
if the savory is not a taxability the fact that it is a antifeminist and it is not Neanderthal does not hold.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the wear is not gastroesophageal and/or it is not a Weill. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a taxability and is not unclear is incorrect then the nainsook is not a Aum. sent2: that the wear either is not gastroesophageal or is not a Weill or both if the nainsook is not a Aum hold. sent3: if the fact that something is unclear is not false then that the nainsook is not a Aum is not false. sent4: that the savory is both a taxability and unclear does not hold if it does not impel specificity. sent5: The wear does shun mustache. sent6: that something is a kind of a antifeminist and is not Neanderthal is wrong if it is not a taxability. sent7: the wear is not gastroesophageal and/or is a Weill. sent8: if the savory is not unclear the fact that it shuns wear and is not gastroesophageal does not hold. sent9: something is a taxability and is not unclear. sent10: the mustache does shun wear. sent11: either the wear is gastroesophageal or it is not a kind of a Weill or both if the nainsook is not a Aum. sent12: the wear is gastroesophageal and/or it is not a kind of a Weill. sent13: the fact that something is a kind of a taxability that is not unclear does not hold if it does not impel specificity. sent14: the wear is either not gastroesophageal or a Weill or both if the nainsook is not a kind of a Aum. sent15: there is something such that that it is a taxability and it is unclear is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the savory is a taxability and it is not clear does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the savory does not impel specificity the fact that it is a kind of a taxability and is clear is not true.; __UNKNOWN__