the shrimp housekeeps neurophysiology.
sent1: That the counterterrorist does not justify counterterrorist is not false. sent2: the windmill is not a kind of a symbol. sent3: the shrimp does housekeep neurophysiology if the windmill is profound. sent4: something housekeeps humanist and is not mesenteric if it does justify counterterrorist. sent5: that something is non-cryonics and it does not justify counterterrorist is not right if the fact that it does not housekeep neurophysiology hold. sent6: if the counterterrorist does not justify counterterrorist then the windmill is not a symbol. sent7: that the tailpipe is both not a novillero and a Texan is incorrect. sent8: the shopaholic justifies counterterrorist but it is not frictional. sent9: if the fact that the counterterrorist is a kind of non-cryonics thing that does not justify counterterrorist is incorrect the shrimp does justify counterterrorist. sent10: the gymslip is profound. sent11: the counterterrorist does not housekeep neurophysiology if there is something such that it does not justify fruiting. sent12: if the counterterrorist does not justify counterterrorist the windmill is profound thing that is not a symbol. sent13: that the counterterrorist does not justify counterterrorist is not false. sent14: the counterterrorist is profound but it does not justify sweat. sent15: the sweat is not a kind of a Texan if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a novillero and is a kind of a Texan is false. sent16: something is partitive and does not housekeep shopaholic if it is not a Texan. sent17: if the sweat is partitive the windmill does not justify fruiting. sent18: the windmill does justify counterterrorist.
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the windmill is profound but it is not a symbol.; int1 -> int2: the windmill is profound.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the shrimp does housekeep humanist and is not mesenteric.
sent4 -> int3: the shrimp housekeeps humanist but it is not mesenteric if it does justify counterterrorist.; sent5 -> int4: if the counterterrorist does not housekeep neurophysiology then that it is a kind of non-cryonics thing that does not justify counterterrorist is incorrect.; sent16 -> int5: the sweat is a partitive that does not housekeep shopaholic if it is not a Texan.; sent7 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a novillero and a Texan is wrong.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the sweat is non-Texan.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the sweat is a kind of a partitive and does not housekeep shopaholic.; int8 -> int9: the sweat is a kind of a partitive.; sent17 & int9 -> int10: the windmill does not justify fruiting.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it does not justify fruiting.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the counterterrorist does not housekeep neurophysiology.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the counterterrorist is non-cryonics thing that does not justify counterterrorist is not right.; sent9 & int13 -> int14: the shrimp justifies counterterrorist.; int3 & int14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the shrimp housekeeps neurophysiology. ; $context$ = sent1: That the counterterrorist does not justify counterterrorist is not false. sent2: the windmill is not a kind of a symbol. sent3: the shrimp does housekeep neurophysiology if the windmill is profound. sent4: something housekeeps humanist and is not mesenteric if it does justify counterterrorist. sent5: that something is non-cryonics and it does not justify counterterrorist is not right if the fact that it does not housekeep neurophysiology hold. sent6: if the counterterrorist does not justify counterterrorist then the windmill is not a symbol. sent7: that the tailpipe is both not a novillero and a Texan is incorrect. sent8: the shopaholic justifies counterterrorist but it is not frictional. sent9: if the fact that the counterterrorist is a kind of non-cryonics thing that does not justify counterterrorist is incorrect the shrimp does justify counterterrorist. sent10: the gymslip is profound. sent11: the counterterrorist does not housekeep neurophysiology if there is something such that it does not justify fruiting. sent12: if the counterterrorist does not justify counterterrorist the windmill is profound thing that is not a symbol. sent13: that the counterterrorist does not justify counterterrorist is not false. sent14: the counterterrorist is profound but it does not justify sweat. sent15: the sweat is not a kind of a Texan if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a novillero and is a kind of a Texan is false. sent16: something is partitive and does not housekeep shopaholic if it is not a Texan. sent17: if the sweat is partitive the windmill does not justify fruiting. sent18: the windmill does justify counterterrorist. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the windmill is profound but it is not a symbol.; int1 -> int2: the windmill is profound.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__