the Mexican does intuit.
sent1: if there is something such that it is a kind of non-anagogic thing that is not organismal the Mexican does not intuit. sent2: if the domain does housekeep linin and does not justify incipiency the stacks is unsarcastic. sent3: if something is a kind of a pastoral then it intuits. sent4: if the domain is not unsarcastic but it does housekeep linin the kimberlite is anagogic. sent5: the stacks is unsarcastic if the domain does not housekeep linin and does not justify incipiency. sent6: the kimberlite is not anagogic. sent7: the ptomaine does not intuit. sent8: the domain does not housekeep linin and does not justify incipiency. sent9: there exists something such that it is Wordsworthian and does not housekeep anisette. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a reforestation. sent11: if the stacks is unsarcastic the hawthorn is non-pastoral but it is unsarcastic. sent12: the kimberlite is non-anagogic and non-organismal if there is something such that it does not housekeep identification. sent13: the kimberlite is not anagogic if there exists something such that it does not housekeep identification. sent14: something does not prod separated and does housekeep linin if the fact that it is a kind of a pastoral hold. sent15: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Orbison. sent16: the Mexican justifies incipiency. sent17: the fact that there is something such that it does not justify incipiency is true. sent18: the domain does not housekeep identification or is unsarcastic or both if it is organismal. sent19: something is not non-anagogic and is not organismal. sent20: the domain does not housekeep linin. sent21: if a non-pastoral thing is not sarcastic then the vulgarizer does not housekeep identification.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the stacks is unsarcastic.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the hawthorn is not a pastoral but it is unsarcastic.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is non-pastoral and it is unsarcastic.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the vulgarizer does not housekeep identification.; int4 -> int5: the fact that something does not housekeep identification is not incorrect.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the kimberlite is not anagogic and it is non-organismal.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not anagogic and is not organismal.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the Mexican intuits.
sent3 -> int8: if the fact that the Mexican is a kind of a pastoral is not incorrect it intuits.;
$hypothesis$ = the Mexican does intuit. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is a kind of non-anagogic thing that is not organismal the Mexican does not intuit. sent2: if the domain does housekeep linin and does not justify incipiency the stacks is unsarcastic. sent3: if something is a kind of a pastoral then it intuits. sent4: if the domain is not unsarcastic but it does housekeep linin the kimberlite is anagogic. sent5: the stacks is unsarcastic if the domain does not housekeep linin and does not justify incipiency. sent6: the kimberlite is not anagogic. sent7: the ptomaine does not intuit. sent8: the domain does not housekeep linin and does not justify incipiency. sent9: there exists something such that it is Wordsworthian and does not housekeep anisette. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a reforestation. sent11: if the stacks is unsarcastic the hawthorn is non-pastoral but it is unsarcastic. sent12: the kimberlite is non-anagogic and non-organismal if there is something such that it does not housekeep identification. sent13: the kimberlite is not anagogic if there exists something such that it does not housekeep identification. sent14: something does not prod separated and does housekeep linin if the fact that it is a kind of a pastoral hold. sent15: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Orbison. sent16: the Mexican justifies incipiency. sent17: the fact that there is something such that it does not justify incipiency is true. sent18: the domain does not housekeep identification or is unsarcastic or both if it is organismal. sent19: something is not non-anagogic and is not organismal. sent20: the domain does not housekeep linin. sent21: if a non-pastoral thing is not sarcastic then the vulgarizer does not housekeep identification. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the stacks is unsarcastic.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the hawthorn is not a pastoral but it is unsarcastic.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is non-pastoral and it is unsarcastic.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the vulgarizer does not housekeep identification.; int4 -> int5: the fact that something does not housekeep identification is not incorrect.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the kimberlite is not anagogic and it is non-organismal.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not anagogic and is not organismal.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__