the fact that the flattening wag does not occur but the puerileness happens is false if the halma occurs.
sent1: the calling does not occur. sent2: the flattening wag does not occur but the puerileness occurs. sent3: that both the thundering and the mindfulness occurs is not correct. sent4: that the turfing accent happens and the divaricating tuner occurs does not hold if the mewing does not occur. sent5: the inauspiciousness happens if the fact that the fact that the non-fermentableness and the flattening gravedigger occurs hold is not right. sent6: that the turn does not occur but the interlinearness occurs is not correct. sent7: if the notch occurs then not the conspicuousness but the turfing thromboplastin occurs. sent8: the fact that the casing push does not occur but the flattening Rastafarian happens is not correct if the stomatousness happens. sent9: the fact that the unmindfulness and the casing topolatry occurs is not right if the viceregalness happens. sent10: if that not the turning but the interlinearness occurs does not hold then the provision occurs. sent11: both the flattening Rolodex and the casing adapter happens. sent12: the fact that both the anestrousness and the casing steel occurs is not correct if the epilation does not occur. sent13: the dimming occurs. sent14: that the divaricating intentness occurs and the exploitation happens does not hold if the flattening Rastafarian occurs. sent15: the fact that both the training and the repercussion happens is not true. sent16: if the casing wheeze does not occur the fact that the fact that not the virologicalness but the rationing occurs is not incorrect is not right. sent17: the halma does not occur if the provision and the debarment happens. sent18: that the turfing accent does not occur but the negotiating happens is wrong if the kinestheticness happens. sent19: that not the flattening gravedigger but the acrogenicness occurs is wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the halma occurs is not false.; sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the provision happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the debarment occurs is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the provisioning and the debarment occurs.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the halma does not occur.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the debarment does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the flattening wag does not occur but the puerileness happens is false if the halma occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the calling does not occur. sent2: the flattening wag does not occur but the puerileness occurs. sent3: that both the thundering and the mindfulness occurs is not correct. sent4: that the turfing accent happens and the divaricating tuner occurs does not hold if the mewing does not occur. sent5: the inauspiciousness happens if the fact that the fact that the non-fermentableness and the flattening gravedigger occurs hold is not right. sent6: that the turn does not occur but the interlinearness occurs is not correct. sent7: if the notch occurs then not the conspicuousness but the turfing thromboplastin occurs. sent8: the fact that the casing push does not occur but the flattening Rastafarian happens is not correct if the stomatousness happens. sent9: the fact that the unmindfulness and the casing topolatry occurs is not right if the viceregalness happens. sent10: if that not the turning but the interlinearness occurs does not hold then the provision occurs. sent11: both the flattening Rolodex and the casing adapter happens. sent12: the fact that both the anestrousness and the casing steel occurs is not correct if the epilation does not occur. sent13: the dimming occurs. sent14: that the divaricating intentness occurs and the exploitation happens does not hold if the flattening Rastafarian occurs. sent15: the fact that both the training and the repercussion happens is not true. sent16: if the casing wheeze does not occur the fact that the fact that not the virologicalness but the rationing occurs is not incorrect is not right. sent17: the halma does not occur if the provision and the debarment happens. sent18: that the turfing accent does not occur but the negotiating happens is wrong if the kinestheticness happens. sent19: that not the flattening gravedigger but the acrogenicness occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the halma occurs is not false.; sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the provision happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the debarment occurs is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the provisioning and the debarment occurs.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the halma does not occur.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the debarment does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__