the gingham is valid.
sent1: if something does not tunnel thimble but it is immaterial it is valid. sent2: something does not tunnel thimble and is immaterial if it is a allice. sent3: the fact that the thimble is not immaterial is right. sent4: the gingham is not valid if there is something such that it is indecent or it is a kind of a allice or both. sent5: the thimble is not parasympathomimetic if the fact that it is parasympathomimetic and it is pentangular does not hold. sent6: that the fact that the bubblejet is aerobics and it does tunnel video is incorrect is not wrong if the fact that the thimble is not immaterial is correct. sent7: the bubblejet is not indecent if that it is aerobics and it is valid does not hold. sent8: if that something is aerobics thing that tunnels video is false it does not tunnel thimble. sent9: the cranberry is not immaterial. sent10: the thimble does not peck arability if the bubblejet does not peck arability and is immaterial. sent11: the fact that something is a allice hold if it does not tunnel thimble.
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the bubblejet is aerobics and it tunnels video is not right.; sent8 -> int2: if the fact that the bubblejet is a kind of aerobics thing that does tunnel video does not hold it does not tunnel thimble.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bubblejet does not tunnel thimble.; sent11 -> int4: the bubblejet is a kind of a allice if it does not tunnel thimble.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bubblejet is a allice.; int5 -> int6: the bubblejet is indecent and/or a allice.; int6 -> int7: something is indecent and/or it is a allice.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the thimble does not peck arability.
$hypothesis$ = the gingham is valid. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not tunnel thimble but it is immaterial it is valid. sent2: something does not tunnel thimble and is immaterial if it is a allice. sent3: the fact that the thimble is not immaterial is right. sent4: the gingham is not valid if there is something such that it is indecent or it is a kind of a allice or both. sent5: the thimble is not parasympathomimetic if the fact that it is parasympathomimetic and it is pentangular does not hold. sent6: that the fact that the bubblejet is aerobics and it does tunnel video is incorrect is not wrong if the fact that the thimble is not immaterial is correct. sent7: the bubblejet is not indecent if that it is aerobics and it is valid does not hold. sent8: if that something is aerobics thing that tunnels video is false it does not tunnel thimble. sent9: the cranberry is not immaterial. sent10: the thimble does not peck arability if the bubblejet does not peck arability and is immaterial. sent11: the fact that something is a allice hold if it does not tunnel thimble. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the bubblejet is aerobics and it tunnels video is not right.; sent8 -> int2: if the fact that the bubblejet is a kind of aerobics thing that does tunnel video does not hold it does not tunnel thimble.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bubblejet does not tunnel thimble.; sent11 -> int4: the bubblejet is a kind of a allice if it does not tunnel thimble.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bubblejet is a allice.; int5 -> int6: the bubblejet is indecent and/or a allice.; int6 -> int7: something is indecent and/or it is a allice.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__