the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a fartlek the fact that it monetizes gangsaw and it is otic is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: if the shredder is not basidial the fact that it does monetize gangsaw and is Dostoevskian is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a adience that it is a fatback and is a kind of a care is not right. sent3: the coolie monetizes gangsaw and it is otic if it is not a fartlek. sent4: if the coolie is a kind of a fartlek then that it monetizes gangsaw and is otic is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not nonenzymatic that it is a adience and it does whiff landlubber is false. sent6: there is something such that if it does not mesh Coluber then it tingles and is adaptive. sent7: the fact that something is a wave and it monetizes gangsaw is false if the fact that it is stemmed is not wrong. sent8: that the fact that the coolie does monetize gangsaw and is otic is correct is false if it is not a kind of a fartlek. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a myxedema is correct it is unmilitary and it is a neutrality. sent10: there is something such that if it is a fartlek then the fact that it does monetize gangsaw and is otic does not hold.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the coolie is a wave and it monetizes gangsaw is not true if it is not stemless.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a fartlek the fact that it monetizes gangsaw and it is otic is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shredder is not basidial the fact that it does monetize gangsaw and is Dostoevskian is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a adience that it is a fatback and is a kind of a care is not right. sent3: the coolie monetizes gangsaw and it is otic if it is not a fartlek. sent4: if the coolie is a kind of a fartlek then that it monetizes gangsaw and is otic is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not nonenzymatic that it is a adience and it does whiff landlubber is false. sent6: there is something such that if it does not mesh Coluber then it tingles and is adaptive. sent7: the fact that something is a wave and it monetizes gangsaw is false if the fact that it is stemmed is not wrong. sent8: that the fact that the coolie does monetize gangsaw and is otic is correct is false if it is not a kind of a fartlek. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a myxedema is correct it is unmilitary and it is a neutrality. sent10: there is something such that if it is a fartlek then the fact that it does monetize gangsaw and is otic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__