the facing does not stigmatize doublespeak and is stemless.
sent1: that that the facing is not a Grant but it does stigmatize topiary is not correct hold. sent2: something does not stigmatize doublespeak but it is stemless if it is not a Cotacachi. sent3: if the slough is not a disturber the facing is sadomasochistic and it is a Grant. sent4: the facing is stemless. sent5: if something is not critical it is not cross-linguistic. sent6: if the largemouth is not a kind of a letters then that it does not perplex catacomb and does not excise affectation does not hold. sent7: the largemouth is not a letters. sent8: the slough does not excise igloo. sent9: the largemouth is not sadomasochistic. sent10: if the facing is heteroecious that it is not atmospheric and is not a kind of a truck does not hold. sent11: the fact that the bureaucrat is stemless is not incorrect if there is something such that it is not a disturber or a letters or both. sent12: there is nothing that does truck and does stigmatize doublespeak. sent13: the largemouth is a disturber. sent14: the fact that the gold is a kind of episcopal thing that is not a kind of a Muscari is false. sent15: if the fact that the facing is not atmospheric and it does not truck is wrong then it is a allusiveness. sent16: if the largemouth is not a letters that it does perplex catacomb and does not excise affectation is false. sent17: the largemouth is a Grant if something is not a kind of a allusiveness and it is not a Cotacachi. sent18: the largemouth does not stigmatize gold if it is not titular. sent19: the largemouth is atmospheric. sent20: the facing is not atmospheric if it is heteroecious and is a disturber. sent21: the pentastomid does not stigmatize doublespeak if the fact that it is a kind of a truck that does stigmatize doublespeak is not true. sent22: something that is a kind of a Grant is not a disturber and/or letters. sent23: the bureaucrat excises igloo if the slough does not excises igloo or it is sadomasochistic or both. sent24: the facing is heteroecious. sent25: the slough is not a disturber if there is something such that the fact that it does not perplex catacomb and it does not excise affectation is not right. sent26: the aureole is a gaucho. sent27: the facing does excise facing.
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: that the largemouth does not perplex catacomb and it does not excise affectation is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does not perplex catacomb and does not excise affectation does not hold.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the slough is not a disturber.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the facing is both sadomasochistic and a Grant.; int4 -> int5: the facing is sadomasochistic.; sent10 & sent24 -> int6: the fact that that the facing is not atmospheric and not a truck is correct is not right.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the facing is a allusiveness.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the facing is sadomasochistic and is a allusiveness.; sent2 -> int9: that the facing does not stigmatize doublespeak and is stemless is not wrong if it is not a Cotacachi.;
the bureaucrat excises igloo and it is stemless.
sent8 -> int10: the slough does not excise igloo or is sadomasochistic or both.; sent23 & int10 -> int11: the bureaucrat does excise igloo.; sent22 -> int12: if the largemouth is a Grant then that it is not a kind of a disturber and/or letters hold.; sent12 -> int13: that the pentastomid trucks and stigmatizes doublespeak does not hold.; sent21 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the pentastomid stigmatizes doublespeak is not correct.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that that it does not stigmatize doublespeak is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the facing does not stigmatize doublespeak and is stemless. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the facing is not a Grant but it does stigmatize topiary is not correct hold. sent2: something does not stigmatize doublespeak but it is stemless if it is not a Cotacachi. sent3: if the slough is not a disturber the facing is sadomasochistic and it is a Grant. sent4: the facing is stemless. sent5: if something is not critical it is not cross-linguistic. sent6: if the largemouth is not a kind of a letters then that it does not perplex catacomb and does not excise affectation does not hold. sent7: the largemouth is not a letters. sent8: the slough does not excise igloo. sent9: the largemouth is not sadomasochistic. sent10: if the facing is heteroecious that it is not atmospheric and is not a kind of a truck does not hold. sent11: the fact that the bureaucrat is stemless is not incorrect if there is something such that it is not a disturber or a letters or both. sent12: there is nothing that does truck and does stigmatize doublespeak. sent13: the largemouth is a disturber. sent14: the fact that the gold is a kind of episcopal thing that is not a kind of a Muscari is false. sent15: if the fact that the facing is not atmospheric and it does not truck is wrong then it is a allusiveness. sent16: if the largemouth is not a letters that it does perplex catacomb and does not excise affectation is false. sent17: the largemouth is a Grant if something is not a kind of a allusiveness and it is not a Cotacachi. sent18: the largemouth does not stigmatize gold if it is not titular. sent19: the largemouth is atmospheric. sent20: the facing is not atmospheric if it is heteroecious and is a disturber. sent21: the pentastomid does not stigmatize doublespeak if the fact that it is a kind of a truck that does stigmatize doublespeak is not true. sent22: something that is a kind of a Grant is not a disturber and/or letters. sent23: the bureaucrat excises igloo if the slough does not excises igloo or it is sadomasochistic or both. sent24: the facing is heteroecious. sent25: the slough is not a disturber if there is something such that the fact that it does not perplex catacomb and it does not excise affectation is not right. sent26: the aureole is a gaucho. sent27: the facing does excise facing. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: that the largemouth does not perplex catacomb and it does not excise affectation is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does not perplex catacomb and does not excise affectation does not hold.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the slough is not a disturber.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the facing is both sadomasochistic and a Grant.; int4 -> int5: the facing is sadomasochistic.; sent10 & sent24 -> int6: the fact that that the facing is not atmospheric and not a truck is correct is not right.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the facing is a allusiveness.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the facing is sadomasochistic and is a allusiveness.; sent2 -> int9: that the facing does not stigmatize doublespeak and is stemless is not wrong if it is not a Cotacachi.; __UNKNOWN__