the Conoy is disrespectful.
sent1: the fact that something is not non-Hertzian hold if the fact that it is not non-Hertzian and is disrespectful does not hold. sent2: if the Conoy is disrespectful and kneads then it is not a kind of a puddingwife. sent3: that something does act caste and it is an alkaloid does not hold if it is not disproportionate. sent4: either the loaner is meningeal or it is not a puddingwife or both if there exists something such that it is a colophony. sent5: the Conoy does condole constant. sent6: the Conoy is meningeal if it is not a puddingwife. sent7: that the muzzle does not act caste is correct if that the hillbilly does act caste and is an alkaloid is incorrect. sent8: if the muzzle condoles constant then that the cappuccino is not non-Hertzian is right. sent9: the Conoy kneads. sent10: The constant does condole Conoy. sent11: something does condole constant and it bends whey if it does not act caste. sent12: the Conoy is meningeal. sent13: if that the hillbilly is a kind of postmodernist thing that is disproportionate is wrong then it is not disproportionate. sent14: the Conoy is meningeal and a colophony if the fact that it is not a puddingwife is correct. sent15: the Conoy is Hertzian. sent16: that the hillbilly is postmodernist and is disproportionate is false. sent17: if the fact that the thulium is a kind of a puddingwife is incorrect the Conoy does not knead but it is not respectful. sent18: the whey is a colophony if the cappuccino is Hertzian. sent19: if the Conoy is Hertzian a colophony it does not condole constant.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Conoy is disrespectful.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the Conoy is disrespectful and does knead.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the Conoy is not a puddingwife is true.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Conoy is a kind of meningeal thing that is a colophony.; int3 -> int4: that the Conoy is a colophony is true.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the Conoy is Hertzian and it is a colophony.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the Conoy does not condole constant.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Conoy is disrespectful.
sent11 -> int8: the muzzle condoles constant and bends whey if it does not act caste.; sent3 -> int9: if the hillbilly is not disproportionate the fact that it acts caste and is an alkaloid does not hold.; sent13 & sent16 -> int10: the hillbilly is not disproportionate.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that that the hillbilly does act caste and it is an alkaloid does not hold is true.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the muzzle does not act caste is right.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the muzzle does condole constant and it does bend whey.; int13 -> int14: the muzzle condoles constant.; sent8 & int14 -> int15: the cappuccino is Hertzian.; sent18 & int15 -> int16: the whey is a kind of a colophony.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is a colophony.; int17 & sent4 -> int18: the loaner is meningeal and/or it is not a puddingwife.;
$hypothesis$ = the Conoy is disrespectful. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not non-Hertzian hold if the fact that it is not non-Hertzian and is disrespectful does not hold. sent2: if the Conoy is disrespectful and kneads then it is not a kind of a puddingwife. sent3: that something does act caste and it is an alkaloid does not hold if it is not disproportionate. sent4: either the loaner is meningeal or it is not a puddingwife or both if there exists something such that it is a colophony. sent5: the Conoy does condole constant. sent6: the Conoy is meningeal if it is not a puddingwife. sent7: that the muzzle does not act caste is correct if that the hillbilly does act caste and is an alkaloid is incorrect. sent8: if the muzzle condoles constant then that the cappuccino is not non-Hertzian is right. sent9: the Conoy kneads. sent10: The constant does condole Conoy. sent11: something does condole constant and it bends whey if it does not act caste. sent12: the Conoy is meningeal. sent13: if that the hillbilly is a kind of postmodernist thing that is disproportionate is wrong then it is not disproportionate. sent14: the Conoy is meningeal and a colophony if the fact that it is not a puddingwife is correct. sent15: the Conoy is Hertzian. sent16: that the hillbilly is postmodernist and is disproportionate is false. sent17: if the fact that the thulium is a kind of a puddingwife is incorrect the Conoy does not knead but it is not respectful. sent18: the whey is a colophony if the cappuccino is Hertzian. sent19: if the Conoy is Hertzian a colophony it does not condole constant. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Conoy is disrespectful.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the Conoy is disrespectful and does knead.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the Conoy is not a puddingwife is true.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Conoy is a kind of meningeal thing that is a colophony.; int3 -> int4: that the Conoy is a colophony is true.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the Conoy is Hertzian and it is a colophony.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the Conoy does not condole constant.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__