that the dissuasion occurs and the stabling aversion happens does not hold.
sent1: the unionizing does not occur if that the stabling aversion happens and/or the dissuasion does not occur does not hold. sent2: that the unexcitableness occurs is brought about by that the unionizing does not occur and/or the bagging does not occur. sent3: that the stabling aversion does not occur is prevented by that the bag does not occur. sent4: if the peeping does not occur then the bag occurs or the newsreel does not occur or both. sent5: that the contribution does not occur and the risking sandhi does not occur is caused by that the receivership does not occur. sent6: if the stabling primacy occurs then the receivership does not occur but the dramatization occurs. sent7: that the commanding Campeche but not the detection happens is not true if the suctorialness occurs. sent8: the suctorialness and the bash happens if the contribution does not occur. sent9: the dissuasion happens. sent10: the stabling bibliopole occurs. sent11: the unionizing does not occur and the bagging does not occur. sent12: if either the bag happens or the newsreel does not occur or both the unionizing does not occur. sent13: the commanding Maori happens and/or the breakthrough does not occur if the magnetosphere does not occur. sent14: if that the commanding Campeche but not the detection happens is not right then the peeping does not occur.
sent11 -> int1: the bagging does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the stabling aversion occurs.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dissuasion and the stabling aversion happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the dissuasion occurs and the stabling aversion happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the unionizing does not occur if that the stabling aversion happens and/or the dissuasion does not occur does not hold. sent2: that the unexcitableness occurs is brought about by that the unionizing does not occur and/or the bagging does not occur. sent3: that the stabling aversion does not occur is prevented by that the bag does not occur. sent4: if the peeping does not occur then the bag occurs or the newsreel does not occur or both. sent5: that the contribution does not occur and the risking sandhi does not occur is caused by that the receivership does not occur. sent6: if the stabling primacy occurs then the receivership does not occur but the dramatization occurs. sent7: that the commanding Campeche but not the detection happens is not true if the suctorialness occurs. sent8: the suctorialness and the bash happens if the contribution does not occur. sent9: the dissuasion happens. sent10: the stabling bibliopole occurs. sent11: the unionizing does not occur and the bagging does not occur. sent12: if either the bag happens or the newsreel does not occur or both the unionizing does not occur. sent13: the commanding Maori happens and/or the breakthrough does not occur if the magnetosphere does not occur. sent14: if that the commanding Campeche but not the detection happens is not right then the peeping does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the bagging does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the stabling aversion occurs.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__