that the cinerariness occurs but the phlegminess does not occur does not hold.
sent1: that the fact that the cinerariness occurs and the phlegminess occurs does not hold is right if the postmeridianness does not occur. sent2: that the fact that the cinerariness and the non-phlegminess happens is not true is correct if the postmeridianness does not occur. sent3: the paroxysmalness happens. sent4: that the corvineness happens is not incorrect. sent5: the phrase happens. sent6: if both the paroxysmalness and the phrase occurs then the postmeridianness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the cinerariness and the phlegminess happens is not correct.
sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the paroxysmalness occurs and the phrasing occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the postmeridianness does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the cinerariness occurs but the phlegminess does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the cinerariness occurs and the phlegminess occurs does not hold is right if the postmeridianness does not occur. sent2: that the fact that the cinerariness and the non-phlegminess happens is not true is correct if the postmeridianness does not occur. sent3: the paroxysmalness happens. sent4: that the corvineness happens is not incorrect. sent5: the phrase happens. sent6: if both the paroxysmalness and the phrase occurs then the postmeridianness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the cinerariness and the phlegminess happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the paroxysmalness occurs and the phrasing occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the postmeridianness does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__