the fact that there is something such that it is not a cassiterite and it is not cataclinal is not true.
sent1: the cryptogam is literary if it is agreeable and is not biflagellate. sent2: if the cryptogam is biflagellate then that it is unripe and it is a cassiterite does not hold. sent3: the arborvitae is literary. sent4: the armadillo does disunify flats if it is a shoot-down and it is not a blotter. sent5: there exists something such that it disunifies semifluidity and is not unripe. sent6: the franc-tireur is alcoholic thing that is not cytogenetic. sent7: if the fact that that the franc-tireur does not browse millicurie and is a blotter hold does not hold it does not disunify semifluidity. sent8: something that does disunify semifluidity is not a chic and not biflagellate. sent9: The gunsight browses franc-tireur. sent10: if the cryptogam is a chic then the arborvitae is unripe. sent11: if the cryptogam is literary it is a chic. sent12: if something disunifies semifluidity then it is not a kind of a chic. sent13: if the franc-tireur does browse gunsight then that it does not browse millicurie and is a kind of a blotter is false. sent14: if the cryptogam is unripe and a chic it is literary. sent15: if the fact that the arborvitae is unripe hold then it is not cataclinal. sent16: the fact that the clerestory is not a blotter is false. sent17: if the cryptogam is agreeable then the fact that the franc-tireur disunifies semifluidity but it does not browse gunsight is not correct. sent18: if the franc-tireur is literary then that it is a blotter is right. sent19: the fact that the franc-tireur does browse millicurie and is a blotter does not hold if it browses gunsight. sent20: the cryptogam is agreeable but it is not biflagellate if the franc-tireur does not disunify semifluidity. sent21: the franc-tireur browses gunsight. sent22: the franc-tireur is not a cassiterite. sent23: something is not a cassiterite and it is not cataclinal if it is not ripe. sent24: the franc-tireur is not agreeable if the cryptogam does not disunify semifluidity.
sent13 & sent21 -> int1: the fact that the franc-tireur does not browse millicurie but it is a kind of a blotter is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the franc-tireur does not disunify semifluidity.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the cryptogam is agreeable but it is not biflagellate.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the cryptogam is literary.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the cryptogam is a chic.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the arborvitae is unripe.; sent23 -> int7: if the arborvitae is unripe then it is not a kind of a cassiterite and it is not cataclinal.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the arborvitae is not a cassiterite and not cataclinal.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the teacher is not unripe.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is not a cassiterite and it is not cataclinal is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the cryptogam is literary if it is agreeable and is not biflagellate. sent2: if the cryptogam is biflagellate then that it is unripe and it is a cassiterite does not hold. sent3: the arborvitae is literary. sent4: the armadillo does disunify flats if it is a shoot-down and it is not a blotter. sent5: there exists something such that it disunifies semifluidity and is not unripe. sent6: the franc-tireur is alcoholic thing that is not cytogenetic. sent7: if the fact that that the franc-tireur does not browse millicurie and is a blotter hold does not hold it does not disunify semifluidity. sent8: something that does disunify semifluidity is not a chic and not biflagellate. sent9: The gunsight browses franc-tireur. sent10: if the cryptogam is a chic then the arborvitae is unripe. sent11: if the cryptogam is literary it is a chic. sent12: if something disunifies semifluidity then it is not a kind of a chic. sent13: if the franc-tireur does browse gunsight then that it does not browse millicurie and is a kind of a blotter is false. sent14: if the cryptogam is unripe and a chic it is literary. sent15: if the fact that the arborvitae is unripe hold then it is not cataclinal. sent16: the fact that the clerestory is not a blotter is false. sent17: if the cryptogam is agreeable then the fact that the franc-tireur disunifies semifluidity but it does not browse gunsight is not correct. sent18: if the franc-tireur is literary then that it is a blotter is right. sent19: the fact that the franc-tireur does browse millicurie and is a blotter does not hold if it browses gunsight. sent20: the cryptogam is agreeable but it is not biflagellate if the franc-tireur does not disunify semifluidity. sent21: the franc-tireur browses gunsight. sent22: the franc-tireur is not a cassiterite. sent23: something is not a cassiterite and it is not cataclinal if it is not ripe. sent24: the franc-tireur is not agreeable if the cryptogam does not disunify semifluidity. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent21 -> int1: the fact that the franc-tireur does not browse millicurie but it is a kind of a blotter is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the franc-tireur does not disunify semifluidity.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the cryptogam is agreeable but it is not biflagellate.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the cryptogam is literary.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the cryptogam is a chic.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the arborvitae is unripe.; sent23 -> int7: if the arborvitae is unripe then it is not a kind of a cassiterite and it is not cataclinal.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the arborvitae is not a cassiterite and not cataclinal.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__