the fact that the assimilation is a heritage is true.
sent1: the Sagittarius is a jackknife-fish. sent2: the voicemail is not a catalectic. sent3: if the carrion is a kind of a registrant the Sagittarius is not autologous. sent4: if the carrion inflates rake then the fact that the Sagittarius is non-autologous is correct. sent5: if the voicemail is not a catalectic the carrion inflates rake or it is a registrant or both. sent6: if something is autologous it is not a heritage and not a catalectic. sent7: that if the carrion is a registrant the Sagittarius is not non-autologous is not wrong.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that either the carrion inflates rake or it is a registrant or both is not wrong.; int1 & sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the Sagittarius is not autologous.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Sagittarius is not autologous and is a jackknife-fish.;
the assimilation is not a kind of a heritage.
sent6 -> int4: the assimilation is not a kind of a heritage and it is not catalectic if it is autologous.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the assimilation is a heritage is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the Sagittarius is a jackknife-fish. sent2: the voicemail is not a catalectic. sent3: if the carrion is a kind of a registrant the Sagittarius is not autologous. sent4: if the carrion inflates rake then the fact that the Sagittarius is non-autologous is correct. sent5: if the voicemail is not a catalectic the carrion inflates rake or it is a registrant or both. sent6: if something is autologous it is not a heritage and not a catalectic. sent7: that if the carrion is a registrant the Sagittarius is not non-autologous is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that either the carrion inflates rake or it is a registrant or both is not wrong.; int1 & sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the Sagittarius is not autologous.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Sagittarius is not autologous and is a jackknife-fish.; __UNKNOWN__