the fact that the ballooning does not occur and the irreconcilableness does not occur is not true.
sent1: that the purpling sloping does not occur yields that the ballooning does not occur and the irreconcilableness does not occur. sent2: that not the respecting Scincidae but the radiating occurs yields the imaging. sent3: the stabilizing happens. sent4: the irreconcilableness does not occur. sent5: the sensorimotorness does not occur. sent6: both the numerating and the stabilizing occurs. sent7: the irreconcilableness does not occur if the purpling sloping does not occur. sent8: the fact that the sensorimotorness occurs is correct if the respecting Scincidae happens. sent9: that the radiating occurs is not false. sent10: if the purpling Lorre happens and the clearance happens then the spreading steel does not occur. sent11: the saponifying happens if the fact that the respecting Scincidae does not occur and the saponifying does not occur is not right. sent12: that the purpling sloping happens is prevented by that the imaging occurs and the numerateness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the respecting Scincidae happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the sensorimotorness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the respecting Scincidae does not occur hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: not the respecting Scincidae but the radiating happens.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the imaging happens.; sent6 -> int6: the numerating occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: both the imaging and the numerating happens.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the purpling sloping does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
both the non-high-interestness and the saponifying occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ballooning does not occur and the irreconcilableness does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the purpling sloping does not occur yields that the ballooning does not occur and the irreconcilableness does not occur. sent2: that not the respecting Scincidae but the radiating occurs yields the imaging. sent3: the stabilizing happens. sent4: the irreconcilableness does not occur. sent5: the sensorimotorness does not occur. sent6: both the numerating and the stabilizing occurs. sent7: the irreconcilableness does not occur if the purpling sloping does not occur. sent8: the fact that the sensorimotorness occurs is correct if the respecting Scincidae happens. sent9: that the radiating occurs is not false. sent10: if the purpling Lorre happens and the clearance happens then the spreading steel does not occur. sent11: the saponifying happens if the fact that the respecting Scincidae does not occur and the saponifying does not occur is not right. sent12: that the purpling sloping happens is prevented by that the imaging occurs and the numerateness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the respecting Scincidae happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the sensorimotorness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the respecting Scincidae does not occur hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: not the respecting Scincidae but the radiating happens.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the imaging happens.; sent6 -> int6: the numerating occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: both the imaging and the numerating happens.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the purpling sloping does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__