the liftman is not afloat.
sent1: the jennet is not angiomatous if the ape-man does clip. sent2: the fact that the buckwheat is a kind of a conductress but it is not a barren is not true. sent3: the buckwheat is a kind of a compatibility. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not a conductress and is not a kind of a barren is incorrect then the ape-man is angiomatous. sent5: if that the jennet does not clip is not correct the liftman is not afloat. sent6: the Assamese is a kind of a Dama. sent7: that the buckwheat is not a conductress and it is not a barren is incorrect.
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a conductress and it is not a barren is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ape-man is angiomatous.;
$hypothesis$ = the liftman is not afloat. ; $context$ = sent1: the jennet is not angiomatous if the ape-man does clip. sent2: the fact that the buckwheat is a kind of a conductress but it is not a barren is not true. sent3: the buckwheat is a kind of a compatibility. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not a conductress and is not a kind of a barren is incorrect then the ape-man is angiomatous. sent5: if that the jennet does not clip is not correct the liftman is not afloat. sent6: the Assamese is a kind of a Dama. sent7: that the buckwheat is not a conductress and it is not a barren is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a conductress and it is not a barren is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ape-man is angiomatous.; __UNKNOWN__