the titmouse does not sample felwort and it is not barometric.
sent1: if something is not a ELF the fact that it is a skyrocket and it does intensify is wrong. sent2: everything does not hook summit. sent3: if the titmouse is not a XYY but a skyrocket then the supernumerary is not barometric. sent4: the nutrition is not a ELF. sent5: the titmouse is not barometric. sent6: if that the supernumerary does not intensify and it is not a kind of a XYY is incorrect it is not a skyrocket. sent7: that that the supernumerary does intensify but it is not a kind of a XYY does not hold hold. sent8: the titmouse does not sample felwort if the nutrition is both not a ELF and a rapper. sent9: that the supernumerary does not intensify but it is a XYY is incorrect if the chaff is not a ELF. sent10: if the chaff is a ELF the nutrition is not a kind of a ELF but it is a rapper. sent11: the supernumerary is a skyrocket. sent12: if that something is a ELF is not wrong then the fact that it does not sample felwort and is not barometric is wrong. sent13: that that the supernumerary intensifies and is not a XYY is not true is not false if the chaff is not a ELF.
the nutrition does not intensify and it does not hook summit.
sent2 -> int1: the chaff does not hook summit.; sent1 -> int2: that the supernumerary is a kind of a skyrocket and it does intensify does not hold if it is not a ELF.;
$hypothesis$ = the titmouse does not sample felwort and it is not barometric. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a ELF the fact that it is a skyrocket and it does intensify is wrong. sent2: everything does not hook summit. sent3: if the titmouse is not a XYY but a skyrocket then the supernumerary is not barometric. sent4: the nutrition is not a ELF. sent5: the titmouse is not barometric. sent6: if that the supernumerary does not intensify and it is not a kind of a XYY is incorrect it is not a skyrocket. sent7: that that the supernumerary does intensify but it is not a kind of a XYY does not hold hold. sent8: the titmouse does not sample felwort if the nutrition is both not a ELF and a rapper. sent9: that the supernumerary does not intensify but it is a XYY is incorrect if the chaff is not a ELF. sent10: if the chaff is a ELF the nutrition is not a kind of a ELF but it is a rapper. sent11: the supernumerary is a skyrocket. sent12: if that something is a ELF is not wrong then the fact that it does not sample felwort and is not barometric is wrong. sent13: that that the supernumerary intensifies and is not a XYY is not true is not false if the chaff is not a ELF. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__