both the listing and the flexibleness occurs.
sent1: the listing happens but the opacity does not occur if the flexibleness does not occur. sent2: that the fading happens but the smoldering does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the desecrating narcissus does not occur is caused by that the listing occurs but the opacity does not occur. sent4: that that the fading but not the smoldering occurs hold does not hold if the opacity occurs. sent5: if the opacity occurs the fact that the fading does not occur and the smoldering does not occur does not hold. sent6: both the separated and the physiotherapeuticness happens. sent7: the fact that the flexibleness happens is not false. sent8: if the fact that the sculpture does not occur hold the weaving does not occur and the exigency does not occur. sent9: if the nosohusialness does not occur then the Platonisticness happens. sent10: both the non-Platonisticness and the non-pemphigousness occurs. sent11: the sculpture does not occur and the searching does not occur if the debarring shopping occurs. sent12: the fade does not occur and the smoldering does not occur. sent13: the fading does not occur. sent14: that the TLC occurs is caused by that the debarring Comanche does not occur. sent15: the non-necromanticness is triggered by that the weaving does not occur and the exigency does not occur. sent16: the non-flexibleness and the non-necromanticness occurs if the weaving occurs. sent17: if the necromanticness does not occur then that the flexibleness occurs and the listing happens is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the opacity occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the fade does not occur and the smoldering does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the opacity does not occur.;
that both the listing and the flexibleness occurs is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = both the listing and the flexibleness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the listing happens but the opacity does not occur if the flexibleness does not occur. sent2: that the fading happens but the smoldering does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the desecrating narcissus does not occur is caused by that the listing occurs but the opacity does not occur. sent4: that that the fading but not the smoldering occurs hold does not hold if the opacity occurs. sent5: if the opacity occurs the fact that the fading does not occur and the smoldering does not occur does not hold. sent6: both the separated and the physiotherapeuticness happens. sent7: the fact that the flexibleness happens is not false. sent8: if the fact that the sculpture does not occur hold the weaving does not occur and the exigency does not occur. sent9: if the nosohusialness does not occur then the Platonisticness happens. sent10: both the non-Platonisticness and the non-pemphigousness occurs. sent11: the sculpture does not occur and the searching does not occur if the debarring shopping occurs. sent12: the fade does not occur and the smoldering does not occur. sent13: the fading does not occur. sent14: that the TLC occurs is caused by that the debarring Comanche does not occur. sent15: the non-necromanticness is triggered by that the weaving does not occur and the exigency does not occur. sent16: the non-flexibleness and the non-necromanticness occurs if the weaving occurs. sent17: if the necromanticness does not occur then that the flexibleness occurs and the listing happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the opacity occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the fade does not occur and the smoldering does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the opacity does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__