the sealant does not solemnize peepshow.
sent1: the fact that something is stenographic thing that is not urinary does not hold if that it does solemnize saint is true. sent2: if something is a clapboard it solemnizes manners. sent3: the benedick does solemnize manners and is not a clapboard. sent4: the sealant is stenographic if it does not solemnize peepshow. sent5: if something is non-Peruvian it does not tease protozoologist. sent6: if that something is not a metrification and/or it is stenographic is false it does not solemnize peepshow. sent7: the metaproterenol does haze Rush. sent8: if the haemosporidian is a kind of a metrification the benedick teases protozoologist. sent9: that if the sealant is stenographic then the fact that the haemosporidian is a metrification is not incorrect hold. sent10: the fact that something is not a metrification or stenographic or both is false if that that it does tease protozoologist hold is not correct. sent11: the haemosporidian solemnizes godfather if the fact that it is a rigger and does not solemnizes godfather does not hold. sent12: the sealant is a clapboard if the haemosporidian does solemnize godfather. sent13: the fact that something is a kind of Peruvian thing that does not haze Rush does not hold if it solemnizes manners. sent14: if the fact that something is a Peruvian but it does not haze Rush is not right then it does not tease protozoologist. sent15: if something solemnizes manners that it does haze Rush and it is not a Peruvian is false. sent16: if that the haemosporidian does not solemnize peepshow and is stenographic is not correct the sealant does not solemnize peepshow. sent17: the benedick does not clapboard. sent18: if the benedick is non-Peruvian the fact that it does not tease protozoologist is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sealant does not solemnize peepshow.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the sealant is stenographic.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the haemosporidian is a metrification.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the benedick does tease protozoologist.; sent14 -> int4: if that the fact that the benedick is a Peruvian that does not haze Rush is right does not hold it does not tease protozoologist.; sent13 -> int5: that the benedick is a Peruvian that does not haze Rush is not true if it solemnizes manners.; sent3 -> int6: the benedick solemnizes manners.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the benedick is a Peruvian and does not haze Rush is false.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the benedick does not tease protozoologist.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the sealant does not solemnize peepshow.
sent6 -> int10: the fact that the sealant does not solemnize peepshow is correct if that it is not a metrification and/or it is not non-stenographic is not true.; sent10 -> int11: if the sealant does not tease protozoologist then that it is not a metrification or it is not non-stenographic or both is not true.; sent15 -> int12: the fact that if the sealant does solemnize manners that the sealant hazes Rush but it is not a Peruvian is incorrect is not wrong.; sent2 -> int13: if the sealant does clapboard it solemnizes manners.;
$hypothesis$ = the sealant does not solemnize peepshow. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is stenographic thing that is not urinary does not hold if that it does solemnize saint is true. sent2: if something is a clapboard it solemnizes manners. sent3: the benedick does solemnize manners and is not a clapboard. sent4: the sealant is stenographic if it does not solemnize peepshow. sent5: if something is non-Peruvian it does not tease protozoologist. sent6: if that something is not a metrification and/or it is stenographic is false it does not solemnize peepshow. sent7: the metaproterenol does haze Rush. sent8: if the haemosporidian is a kind of a metrification the benedick teases protozoologist. sent9: that if the sealant is stenographic then the fact that the haemosporidian is a metrification is not incorrect hold. sent10: the fact that something is not a metrification or stenographic or both is false if that that it does tease protozoologist hold is not correct. sent11: the haemosporidian solemnizes godfather if the fact that it is a rigger and does not solemnizes godfather does not hold. sent12: the sealant is a clapboard if the haemosporidian does solemnize godfather. sent13: the fact that something is a kind of Peruvian thing that does not haze Rush does not hold if it solemnizes manners. sent14: if the fact that something is a Peruvian but it does not haze Rush is not right then it does not tease protozoologist. sent15: if something solemnizes manners that it does haze Rush and it is not a Peruvian is false. sent16: if that the haemosporidian does not solemnize peepshow and is stenographic is not correct the sealant does not solemnize peepshow. sent17: the benedick does not clapboard. sent18: if the benedick is non-Peruvian the fact that it does not tease protozoologist is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sealant does not solemnize peepshow.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the sealant is stenographic.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the haemosporidian is a metrification.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the benedick does tease protozoologist.; sent14 -> int4: if that the fact that the benedick is a Peruvian that does not haze Rush is right does not hold it does not tease protozoologist.; sent13 -> int5: that the benedick is a Peruvian that does not haze Rush is not true if it solemnizes manners.; sent3 -> int6: the benedick solemnizes manners.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the benedick is a Peruvian and does not haze Rush is false.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the benedick does not tease protozoologist.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__