the Lady is not a clearness.
sent1: if something does not individuate Shakespearian then it does not irrigate and is not a compendium. sent2: that the trout is polymorphic is correct. sent3: if that the call does not irrigate and is not a string is not incorrect the flagfish is not a string. sent4: the strontium is divisional and sightsees if there is something such that it is polymorphic. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both luteal and not a clearness does not hold the Lady is a dishtowel. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is lipless and it is not violent is not true the minimum is luteal. sent7: everything does not individuate Shakespearian. sent8: that that the Shakespearian is a kind of a dishtowel and is not a kind of a string is true is not true. sent9: the fact that the call is a string is false if that the strontium is divisional and it sightsees is true. sent10: the fact that the Shakespearian is luteal thing that is not a kind of a string is false. sent11: if something is a kind of a clearness then the Lady is luteal. sent12: if the minimum is a dishtowel then the fact that the Lady is a dishtowel is not wrong. sent13: if something is not a string then that it is luteal and it is not a kind of a team does not hold. sent14: if something is not a kind of a dishtowel then the fact that it is not lipped and it is not violent is wrong. sent15: that something is lipless and is violent does not hold if it is not a dishtowel. sent16: if the minimum is luteal then the Lady is not a clearness and it is not luteal. sent17: the Lady is not violent if the kazoo is not violent. sent18: the fact that the kazoo is a kind of violent thing that is not luteal does not hold. sent19: the minimum is a kind of a dishtowel if the fact that the Shakespearian is a dishtowel hold. sent20: that that the kazoo is a kind of a clearness but it is not lipless does not hold is right. sent21: the arbiter does not sunburn. sent22: if something is not a kind of a dishtowel it is not divisional. sent23: something is not luteal if the fact that it is luteal but not a team does not hold. sent24: if the flagfish is not luteal the Shakespearian is a kind of a dishtowel.
sent14 -> int1: that the kazoo is lipless but it is not violent is not correct if it is not a dishtowel.;
the fact that the Lady is not divisional is correct.
sent22 -> int2: the Lady is non-divisional if it is not a dishtowel.;
$hypothesis$ = the Lady is not a clearness. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not individuate Shakespearian then it does not irrigate and is not a compendium. sent2: that the trout is polymorphic is correct. sent3: if that the call does not irrigate and is not a string is not incorrect the flagfish is not a string. sent4: the strontium is divisional and sightsees if there is something such that it is polymorphic. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both luteal and not a clearness does not hold the Lady is a dishtowel. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is lipless and it is not violent is not true the minimum is luteal. sent7: everything does not individuate Shakespearian. sent8: that that the Shakespearian is a kind of a dishtowel and is not a kind of a string is true is not true. sent9: the fact that the call is a string is false if that the strontium is divisional and it sightsees is true. sent10: the fact that the Shakespearian is luteal thing that is not a kind of a string is false. sent11: if something is a kind of a clearness then the Lady is luteal. sent12: if the minimum is a dishtowel then the fact that the Lady is a dishtowel is not wrong. sent13: if something is not a string then that it is luteal and it is not a kind of a team does not hold. sent14: if something is not a kind of a dishtowel then the fact that it is not lipped and it is not violent is wrong. sent15: that something is lipless and is violent does not hold if it is not a dishtowel. sent16: if the minimum is luteal then the Lady is not a clearness and it is not luteal. sent17: the Lady is not violent if the kazoo is not violent. sent18: the fact that the kazoo is a kind of violent thing that is not luteal does not hold. sent19: the minimum is a kind of a dishtowel if the fact that the Shakespearian is a dishtowel hold. sent20: that that the kazoo is a kind of a clearness but it is not lipless does not hold is right. sent21: the arbiter does not sunburn. sent22: if something is not a kind of a dishtowel it is not divisional. sent23: something is not luteal if the fact that it is luteal but not a team does not hold. sent24: if the flagfish is not luteal the Shakespearian is a kind of a dishtowel. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: that the kazoo is lipless but it is not violent is not correct if it is not a dishtowel.; __UNKNOWN__