that that the ECCM does not occur and the divaricating lawn does not occur is brought about by the breakdown is wrong.
sent1: the breakdown happens and the complication happens. sent2: the presentment happens or the messaging happens or both. sent3: either the presentment does not occur or the messaging happens or both. sent4: the divaricating lawn does not occur if the fact that the fact that not the breakdown but the complication happens is correct does not hold. sent5: the casing jack-in-the-box occurs. sent6: the fact that the psychotherapy does not occur and the abasement happens is wrong. sent7: the flattening kris does not occur if that not the complication but the breakdown happens is wrong. sent8: if the presentment occurs then that the complication does not occur but the breakdown occurs is incorrect. sent9: that the ECCM does not occur is caused by that the presentment does not occur. sent10: the ECCM does not occur if the presentment does not occur and/or the messaging occurs. sent11: if the panto does not occur the presentment occurs and the adequateness occurs. sent12: the divaricating lawn is prevented by that not the breakdown but the complication occurs. sent13: that the forcing does not occur causes that the panto does not occur. sent14: if the complication does not occur the divaricating lawn does not occur. sent15: the complication happens. sent16: the fact that the force does not occur is right. sent17: the drilling does not occur. sent18: that the sunset occurs is not incorrect. sent19: the divaricating lawn does not occur if the fact that the breakdown and the complication happens is wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the breakdown but the complication happens.; assump2 -> int1: the breakdown does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the breakdown happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that not the breakdown but the complication happens is not true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the divaricating lawn does not occur.; sent10 & sent3 -> int5: the ECCM does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ECCM does not occur and the divaricating lawn does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that not the flattening kris but the generativeness occurs is not incorrect.
sent13 & sent16 -> int7: the panto does not occur.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: the presentment and the adequateness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the presentment occurs.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the complication does not occur but the breakdown occurs does not hold.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the flattening kris does not occur hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the ECCM does not occur and the divaricating lawn does not occur is brought about by the breakdown is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the breakdown happens and the complication happens. sent2: the presentment happens or the messaging happens or both. sent3: either the presentment does not occur or the messaging happens or both. sent4: the divaricating lawn does not occur if the fact that the fact that not the breakdown but the complication happens is correct does not hold. sent5: the casing jack-in-the-box occurs. sent6: the fact that the psychotherapy does not occur and the abasement happens is wrong. sent7: the flattening kris does not occur if that not the complication but the breakdown happens is wrong. sent8: if the presentment occurs then that the complication does not occur but the breakdown occurs is incorrect. sent9: that the ECCM does not occur is caused by that the presentment does not occur. sent10: the ECCM does not occur if the presentment does not occur and/or the messaging occurs. sent11: if the panto does not occur the presentment occurs and the adequateness occurs. sent12: the divaricating lawn is prevented by that not the breakdown but the complication occurs. sent13: that the forcing does not occur causes that the panto does not occur. sent14: if the complication does not occur the divaricating lawn does not occur. sent15: the complication happens. sent16: the fact that the force does not occur is right. sent17: the drilling does not occur. sent18: that the sunset occurs is not incorrect. sent19: the divaricating lawn does not occur if the fact that the breakdown and the complication happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the breakdown but the complication happens.; assump2 -> int1: the breakdown does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the breakdown happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that not the breakdown but the complication happens is not true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the divaricating lawn does not occur.; sent10 & sent3 -> int5: the ECCM does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ECCM does not occur and the divaricating lawn does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__