the postmeridianness occurs.
sent1: the spoiling happens. sent2: the hold-down occurs. sent3: the olfactoriness does not occur and the masterpiece does not occur if the kvetch occurs. sent4: the roentgenography occurs if the pneumaticsness happens. sent5: the fact that the minuet does not occur is not incorrect if the empiricness does not occur. sent6: that the minuet does not occur results in that not the hemorrhagicness but the aspersion happens. sent7: if the spoil happens the forecasting Miro occurs. sent8: if that the assault does not occur and the laryngospasm does not occur is not wrong that the postmeridianness happens is not false. sent9: the complex happens. sent10: the kvetch happens. sent11: if both the orchestration and the non-olfactoriness occurs the forecasting putterer does not occur. sent12: if the clawing happens that the non-postmeridianness and the spoiling occurs is false. sent13: the undueness does not occur if that the laryngospasm does not occur and the assault does not occur is false. sent14: the laryngospasm happens. sent15: that the pneumaticsness happens and/or the orchestralness happens is caused by that the forecasting putterer does not occur. sent16: if the roentgenography occurs not the empiricness but the perviousness happens. sent17: the laryngospasm and the assault happens. sent18: if the forecasting Miro does not occur then the fact that the laryngospasm does not occur and the assault does not occur does not hold. sent19: if that the hemorrhagicness does not occur is not false then both the clawing and the magnification happens. sent20: if the forecasting Miro occurs and the assault occurs the postmeridianness does not occur. sent21: both the orchestration and the feeling occurs.
sent17 -> int1: the assault happens.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the forecasting Miro happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the forecasting Miro and the assault occurs.; int3 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the postmeridianness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the postmeridianness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the spoiling happens. sent2: the hold-down occurs. sent3: the olfactoriness does not occur and the masterpiece does not occur if the kvetch occurs. sent4: the roentgenography occurs if the pneumaticsness happens. sent5: the fact that the minuet does not occur is not incorrect if the empiricness does not occur. sent6: that the minuet does not occur results in that not the hemorrhagicness but the aspersion happens. sent7: if the spoil happens the forecasting Miro occurs. sent8: if that the assault does not occur and the laryngospasm does not occur is not wrong that the postmeridianness happens is not false. sent9: the complex happens. sent10: the kvetch happens. sent11: if both the orchestration and the non-olfactoriness occurs the forecasting putterer does not occur. sent12: if the clawing happens that the non-postmeridianness and the spoiling occurs is false. sent13: the undueness does not occur if that the laryngospasm does not occur and the assault does not occur is false. sent14: the laryngospasm happens. sent15: that the pneumaticsness happens and/or the orchestralness happens is caused by that the forecasting putterer does not occur. sent16: if the roentgenography occurs not the empiricness but the perviousness happens. sent17: the laryngospasm and the assault happens. sent18: if the forecasting Miro does not occur then the fact that the laryngospasm does not occur and the assault does not occur does not hold. sent19: if that the hemorrhagicness does not occur is not false then both the clawing and the magnification happens. sent20: if the forecasting Miro occurs and the assault occurs the postmeridianness does not occur. sent21: both the orchestration and the feeling occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the assault happens.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the forecasting Miro happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the forecasting Miro and the assault occurs.; int3 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__