there is something such that if it is a Japanese either it is not a kind of an objective or it does jumble concreteness or both.
sent1: if the heronry does jumble clostridium and does not consummate the forger does not jumble clostridium. sent2: if the agapanthus either is not an objective or does jumble concreteness or both it is not a Japanese. sent3: if the agapanthus is Japanese it is not non-objective and/or it does jumble concreteness. sent4: there is something such that if it is metallic it does not crowd and/or it is a kind of a mew. sent5: if that the odonate crowds but it is not a metallic is not correct the heronry does not crowds. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a crowd but it is not metallic is not correct if it is not a bassist. sent7: if the odonate is a kind of hydrophilic thing that is cryonic that it is not a kind of a bassist is right. sent8: if something does not crowd the fact that it is a kind of revivalistic a alehoof hold. sent9: something that is revivalistic does jumble clostridium and does not consummate. sent10: if the fact that the agapanthus is not objective or jumbles concreteness or both is incorrect then it is Japanese. sent11: if the forger does not jumble clostridium the fact that the chatterbox does not jumble ogress and it is not a Japanese is false. sent12: the agapanthus is objective. sent13: the agapanthus does jumble ogress if the fact that the chatterbox does not jumble ogress and it is not a kind of a Japanese is false. sent14: that the pentail either is not a chlorobenzene or interlocks bighorn or both is not true. sent15: the agapanthus is not a Japanese if the fact that it is an objective or does jumble concreteness or both is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the agapanthus is not objective or it does jumble concreteness or both is not correct.;
the fact that the agapanthus jumbles ogress is true.
sent9 -> int1: the heronry jumbles clostridium but it does not consummate if it is revivalistic.; sent8 -> int2: if the heronry is not a kind of a crowd then it is revivalistic and it is a alehoof.; sent6 -> int3: that the odonate is a crowd but it is not metallic does not hold if the fact that it is not a bassist is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a Japanese either it is not a kind of an objective or it does jumble concreteness or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the heronry does jumble clostridium and does not consummate the forger does not jumble clostridium. sent2: if the agapanthus either is not an objective or does jumble concreteness or both it is not a Japanese. sent3: if the agapanthus is Japanese it is not non-objective and/or it does jumble concreteness. sent4: there is something such that if it is metallic it does not crowd and/or it is a kind of a mew. sent5: if that the odonate crowds but it is not a metallic is not correct the heronry does not crowds. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a crowd but it is not metallic is not correct if it is not a bassist. sent7: if the odonate is a kind of hydrophilic thing that is cryonic that it is not a kind of a bassist is right. sent8: if something does not crowd the fact that it is a kind of revivalistic a alehoof hold. sent9: something that is revivalistic does jumble clostridium and does not consummate. sent10: if the fact that the agapanthus is not objective or jumbles concreteness or both is incorrect then it is Japanese. sent11: if the forger does not jumble clostridium the fact that the chatterbox does not jumble ogress and it is not a Japanese is false. sent12: the agapanthus is objective. sent13: the agapanthus does jumble ogress if the fact that the chatterbox does not jumble ogress and it is not a kind of a Japanese is false. sent14: that the pentail either is not a chlorobenzene or interlocks bighorn or both is not true. sent15: the agapanthus is not a Japanese if the fact that it is an objective or does jumble concreteness or both is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the agapanthus is not objective or it does jumble concreteness or both is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__