there is something such that if it refaces Pauling then it is not benthic and it is mealy.
sent1: if the Kurd refaces Pauling it is mealy. sent2: the Kurd is not benthic but it is not non-mealy if that it refaces Pauling is not incorrect. sent3: the Kurd is not mealy but it is repeatable if that it does reface fantan is true. sent4: there is something such that if it is a briquette then it does not reface deflector and it is alveolar. sent5: that there is something such that if it refaces mescal then it is not a DAT and it is a kind of a bluff is correct. sent6: there exists something such that if it does reface Pauling then it is not benthic. sent7: if something is saxicolous that it is non-benthic and it refaces meson is true. sent8: there is something such that if it refaces Pauling then it is mealy. sent9: there is something such that if it does reface Pauling it is benthic and it is mealy. sent10: the Kurd is benthic and is mealy if it does reface Pauling. sent11: the Kurd is not a Septobasidium but it refaces Pauling if it is a toxicity. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a looking it does not fracture Laffite and it does specify centime. sent13: there is something such that if it is a fatality then it does not underlie and it is a linchpin. sent14: there exists something such that if it is eutrophic then it is not a neutrino and fractures militarism. sent15: if that the Kurd does reface Pauling is true it is not a velar and it is a kind of a duffel. sent16: if the Kurd does reface Pauling then it is not phenomenal and it skimps. sent17: there is something such that if it does uncurl it is not eutrophic and is a Areopagite.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the bilges is saxicolous then it is non-benthic thing that refaces meson.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it refaces Pauling then it is not benthic and it is mealy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Kurd refaces Pauling it is mealy. sent2: the Kurd is not benthic but it is not non-mealy if that it refaces Pauling is not incorrect. sent3: the Kurd is not mealy but it is repeatable if that it does reface fantan is true. sent4: there is something such that if it is a briquette then it does not reface deflector and it is alveolar. sent5: that there is something such that if it refaces mescal then it is not a DAT and it is a kind of a bluff is correct. sent6: there exists something such that if it does reface Pauling then it is not benthic. sent7: if something is saxicolous that it is non-benthic and it refaces meson is true. sent8: there is something such that if it refaces Pauling then it is mealy. sent9: there is something such that if it does reface Pauling it is benthic and it is mealy. sent10: the Kurd is benthic and is mealy if it does reface Pauling. sent11: the Kurd is not a Septobasidium but it refaces Pauling if it is a toxicity. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a looking it does not fracture Laffite and it does specify centime. sent13: there is something such that if it is a fatality then it does not underlie and it is a linchpin. sent14: there exists something such that if it is eutrophic then it is not a neutrino and fractures militarism. sent15: if that the Kurd does reface Pauling is true it is not a velar and it is a kind of a duffel. sent16: if the Kurd does reface Pauling then it is not phenomenal and it skimps. sent17: there is something such that if it does uncurl it is not eutrophic and is a Areopagite. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__