the astronavigation does not occur.
sent1: the patronizing irreligiousness does not occur. sent2: if the bimorphemicness happens then that the snuffing brother-in-law but not the eye happens is not right. sent3: that both the professional and the non-vestalness happens does not hold if the acceding happens. sent4: the acceding occurs. sent5: the astronavigation does not occur if that the professionalness happens and the vestalness does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the roosting does not occur. sent7: the exteroceptiveness does not occur if that the lightingness but not the riding happens is wrong.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the professional happens but the vestal does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the astronavigation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the patronizing irreligiousness does not occur. sent2: if the bimorphemicness happens then that the snuffing brother-in-law but not the eye happens is not right. sent3: that both the professional and the non-vestalness happens does not hold if the acceding happens. sent4: the acceding occurs. sent5: the astronavigation does not occur if that the professionalness happens and the vestalness does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the roosting does not occur. sent7: the exteroceptiveness does not occur if that the lightingness but not the riding happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the professional happens but the vestal does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__