there is something such that if that it is a burnous that is not airworthy does not hold then it overuses ichthyosaur.
sent1: if the ichthyosaur is not inextricable it is Ambrosian. sent2: if that something is pyemic but it is not a Coke is not true then it is a kind of a Mandaean. sent3: if that the ichthyosaur is a burnous but it is not airworthy is not correct it does overuse ichthyosaur. sent4: if that the ichthyosaur is not a burnous is correct then it is a Shavian. sent5: if the fact that the conchologist is carotid and is not a kind of a abstractionist is incorrect then it necks. sent6: if that the ichthyosaur does overuse ichthyosaur and is not a sniffler is not correct it tips lineup. sent7: there is something such that if it is airworthy then it overuses ichthyosaur. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a burnous the fact that it overuses ichthyosaur hold. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is a burnous and airworthy is not correct then it overuses ichthyosaur. sent10: the ichthyosaur overuses ichthyosaur if that it is a burnous and is airworthy does not hold.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is pyemic and is not a kind of a Coke is false then it is Mandaean.
sent2 -> int1: that if the fact that the peridotite is pyemic but not the Coke is false the peridotite is a Mandaean is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a burnous that is not airworthy does not hold then it overuses ichthyosaur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ichthyosaur is not inextricable it is Ambrosian. sent2: if that something is pyemic but it is not a Coke is not true then it is a kind of a Mandaean. sent3: if that the ichthyosaur is a burnous but it is not airworthy is not correct it does overuse ichthyosaur. sent4: if that the ichthyosaur is not a burnous is correct then it is a Shavian. sent5: if the fact that the conchologist is carotid and is not a kind of a abstractionist is incorrect then it necks. sent6: if that the ichthyosaur does overuse ichthyosaur and is not a sniffler is not correct it tips lineup. sent7: there is something such that if it is airworthy then it overuses ichthyosaur. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a burnous the fact that it overuses ichthyosaur hold. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is a burnous and airworthy is not correct then it overuses ichthyosaur. sent10: the ichthyosaur overuses ichthyosaur if that it is a burnous and is airworthy does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__