that the slob does not bumble is not incorrect.
sent1: the roentgenogram is improvident and it is a stinkhorn. sent2: the slob does bumble if the roentgenogram is violent. sent3: if something is not violent then that it is a stinkhorn and is not improvident is false. sent4: there exists nothing such that it is violent and it confuses unprofitableness. sent5: if something is a kind of a stinkhorn then it is violent.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the roentgenogram is a stinkhorn is correct.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that the roentgenogram is violent is not incorrect if it is a stinkhorn.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the roentgenogram is violent.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the slob does not bumble.
sent3 -> int4: if the slob is not violent then that it is a stinkhorn and it is not improvident is wrong.; sent4 -> int5: that the roentgenogram is violent and it does confuse unprofitableness is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the slob does not bumble is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the roentgenogram is improvident and it is a stinkhorn. sent2: the slob does bumble if the roentgenogram is violent. sent3: if something is not violent then that it is a stinkhorn and is not improvident is false. sent4: there exists nothing such that it is violent and it confuses unprofitableness. sent5: if something is a kind of a stinkhorn then it is violent. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the roentgenogram is a stinkhorn is correct.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that the roentgenogram is violent is not incorrect if it is a stinkhorn.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the roentgenogram is violent.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__