the fact that the Welsh is transeunt is true.
sent1: that the fact that something jockeys reluctance and is not a flag does not hold if it is not a staleness is right. sent2: the bedroll is unsarcastic if the fact that the potentiation is not a flag but it does vaticinate is not false. sent3: something does not jockey gargoylism and it is not a staleness if it is unsarcastic. sent4: if that the potentiation does jockey reluctance but it does not flag is not true the Welsh is a flag. sent5: the potentiation is not a staleness. sent6: the potentiation does jockey reluctance. sent7: the bedroll does vaticinate if the potentiation does not jockey gargoylism and is not a staleness. sent8: the bioluminescence does not clank mariner and is not a magnesium. sent9: if something does not jockey reluctance and is unsarcastic it is transeunt. sent10: if the potentiation is not vinaceous then that either it does not vaticinate or it is not a kind of a staleness or both is not correct. sent11: the Welsh does not jockey reluctance if there is something such that that it does not vaticinate or it is not a staleness or both does not hold. sent12: the Welsh does not jockey reluctance. sent13: the Welsh is heterodactyl. sent14: the NB is a staleness and jockeys gargoylism. sent15: the bedroll vaticinates if the potentiation does not jockey gargoylism and is a staleness. sent16: the bedroll is a staleness. sent17: something is vinaceous if it does vaticinate. sent18: the bedroll is not a Izmir and it does not jockey reluctance. sent19: if the promulgator is a vinegarroon it does jockey gargoylism. sent20: if something is unsarcastic then it is not a staleness. sent21: if the potentiation is unsarcastic then that it is not a staleness hold. sent22: the potentiation is not vinaceous if the fact that it is a kind of a pirouette and does consort amount is correct. sent23: the Welsh is not transeunt if the bedroll is vinaceous and a flag. sent24: the bedroll does flag. sent25: the potentiation does jockey reluctance and is unsarcastic.
sent25 -> int1: the potentiation is unsarcastic.; sent3 -> int2: if the potentiation is unsarcastic then it does not jockey gargoylism and it is not a staleness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the potentiation does not jockey gargoylism and is not a staleness.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the bedroll does vaticinate.; sent17 -> int5: the bedroll is vinaceous if it vaticinates.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bedroll is vinaceous.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: the bedroll is vinaceous and it is a flag.; int7 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
the Welsh is transeunt.
sent9 -> int8: the Welsh is transeunt if it does not jockey reluctance and is unsarcastic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Welsh is transeunt is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that something jockeys reluctance and is not a flag does not hold if it is not a staleness is right. sent2: the bedroll is unsarcastic if the fact that the potentiation is not a flag but it does vaticinate is not false. sent3: something does not jockey gargoylism and it is not a staleness if it is unsarcastic. sent4: if that the potentiation does jockey reluctance but it does not flag is not true the Welsh is a flag. sent5: the potentiation is not a staleness. sent6: the potentiation does jockey reluctance. sent7: the bedroll does vaticinate if the potentiation does not jockey gargoylism and is not a staleness. sent8: the bioluminescence does not clank mariner and is not a magnesium. sent9: if something does not jockey reluctance and is unsarcastic it is transeunt. sent10: if the potentiation is not vinaceous then that either it does not vaticinate or it is not a kind of a staleness or both is not correct. sent11: the Welsh does not jockey reluctance if there is something such that that it does not vaticinate or it is not a staleness or both does not hold. sent12: the Welsh does not jockey reluctance. sent13: the Welsh is heterodactyl. sent14: the NB is a staleness and jockeys gargoylism. sent15: the bedroll vaticinates if the potentiation does not jockey gargoylism and is a staleness. sent16: the bedroll is a staleness. sent17: something is vinaceous if it does vaticinate. sent18: the bedroll is not a Izmir and it does not jockey reluctance. sent19: if the promulgator is a vinegarroon it does jockey gargoylism. sent20: if something is unsarcastic then it is not a staleness. sent21: if the potentiation is unsarcastic then that it is not a staleness hold. sent22: the potentiation is not vinaceous if the fact that it is a kind of a pirouette and does consort amount is correct. sent23: the Welsh is not transeunt if the bedroll is vinaceous and a flag. sent24: the bedroll does flag. sent25: the potentiation does jockey reluctance and is unsarcastic. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 -> int1: the potentiation is unsarcastic.; sent3 -> int2: if the potentiation is unsarcastic then it does not jockey gargoylism and it is not a staleness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the potentiation does not jockey gargoylism and is not a staleness.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the bedroll does vaticinate.; sent17 -> int5: the bedroll is vinaceous if it vaticinates.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bedroll is vinaceous.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: the bedroll is vinaceous and it is a flag.; int7 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__