the cementum is a Antwerpen.
sent1: the acervulus is a stand. sent2: the retardant is salable but not a jessamine. sent3: the bluing is ropy and a stand. sent4: the bluing is a kind of a stand. sent5: the bluing ulcerates if the retardant is a tapotement. sent6: if something is not a pointsman the retardant is not ropy and it is not a stand. sent7: if the retardant is salable and not a jessamine it is a kind of a tapotement. sent8: the bluing is salable. sent9: the bluing is not a kind of a pointsman. sent10: the bluing is a stand and it is a jessamine. sent11: something does stand if it is ropy. sent12: something is salable thing that ulcerates if that it is not a tapotement is not incorrect. sent13: the retardant is salable. sent14: if the bluing is not a Antwerpen but it is a menagerie then the retardant is not a tapotement. sent15: there exists something such that it is a menagerie. sent16: if something is a kind of non-ropy thing that is not a kind of a stand then it is not a menagerie. sent17: something is not a Antwerpen but it is a kind of a menagerie if it is a pointsman. sent18: something is a menagerie if it is ropy. sent19: there exists something such that it does ulcerate. sent20: if something is ropy and is not a stand it is psycholinguistics.
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: that the retardant is a tapotement hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the bluing ulcerates.; sent18 -> int3: if the bluing is ropy it is a kind of a menagerie.; sent3 -> int4: the bluing is ropy.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bluing is a menagerie.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the bluing does ulcerate and is a menagerie.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does ulcerate and is a menagerie.;
the retardant is salable thing that is psycholinguistics.
sent12 -> int8: if the retardant is not a tapotement it is salable and does ulcerate.; sent17 -> int9: if the bluing is a kind of a pointsman then it is not a Antwerpen and it is a kind of a menagerie.; sent20 -> int10: the retardant is psycholinguistics if it is ropy and does not stand.;
$hypothesis$ = the cementum is a Antwerpen. ; $context$ = sent1: the acervulus is a stand. sent2: the retardant is salable but not a jessamine. sent3: the bluing is ropy and a stand. sent4: the bluing is a kind of a stand. sent5: the bluing ulcerates if the retardant is a tapotement. sent6: if something is not a pointsman the retardant is not ropy and it is not a stand. sent7: if the retardant is salable and not a jessamine it is a kind of a tapotement. sent8: the bluing is salable. sent9: the bluing is not a kind of a pointsman. sent10: the bluing is a stand and it is a jessamine. sent11: something does stand if it is ropy. sent12: something is salable thing that ulcerates if that it is not a tapotement is not incorrect. sent13: the retardant is salable. sent14: if the bluing is not a Antwerpen but it is a menagerie then the retardant is not a tapotement. sent15: there exists something such that it is a menagerie. sent16: if something is a kind of non-ropy thing that is not a kind of a stand then it is not a menagerie. sent17: something is not a Antwerpen but it is a kind of a menagerie if it is a pointsman. sent18: something is a menagerie if it is ropy. sent19: there exists something such that it does ulcerate. sent20: if something is ropy and is not a stand it is psycholinguistics. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: that the retardant is a tapotement hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the bluing ulcerates.; sent18 -> int3: if the bluing is ropy it is a kind of a menagerie.; sent3 -> int4: the bluing is ropy.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bluing is a menagerie.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the bluing does ulcerate and is a menagerie.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does ulcerate and is a menagerie.; __UNKNOWN__