the Goldsmith is bracteate but it is not stoichiometric.
sent1: if something is not a temporal then the fact that it is a kind of a tomograph and does not parallel Enlightenment is not true. sent2: the romper is stoichiometric but it is noncurrent. sent3: that the alphabetizer is not a humming hold if that either it does overbear degeneracy or it is a Cantharellus or both is wrong. sent4: if the alphabetizer is not a current then that the romper is a current and is not a kind of a inoculator is not right. sent5: if the romper is not unemployable then the Goldsmith is bracteate but it is not stoichiometric. sent6: if something is current that it is bracteate and it is not stoichiometric does not hold. sent7: the kayak is both caulescent and not a Citation if it overbears conchfish. sent8: if the alphabetizer is not a current then the fact that the romper is not current and it is not a inoculator is wrong. sent9: if that something does not overbear degeneracy or it is a kind of a Cantharellus or both is not correct it does not hum. sent10: the curd does not overbear Curietherapy and it is not a kind of a temporal if the pocketknife is a scut. sent11: that the alphabetizer either does not overbear degeneracy or is a kind of a Cantharellus or both is not true. sent12: the fact that the alphabetizer overbears degeneracy is not false. sent13: the busman is a kind of a gun that is a kind of a tomograph. sent14: the busman is not a gun if the alphabetizer does not hum but it is a kind of a current. sent15: something that is not a gun and is a humming is current. sent16: the fact that the kayak does not overbear conchfish and is not chancroidal is wrong. sent17: if the romper is not unemployable then the Goldsmith is bracteate. sent18: the Goldsmith is bracteate. sent19: the Goldsmith is not a gun but it does hum if the busman is not a inoculator. sent20: the kayak overbears conchfish if that it does not overbears conchfish and it is not chancroidal is not true. sent21: if that something does overbear degeneracy or it is a Cantharellus or both is not correct it is not a humming. sent22: something that is not caulescent is a kind of a scut and does overbear Naemorhedus. sent23: if the kayak is caulescent but it is not a kind of a Citation then the pocketknife is not caulescent. sent24: the alphabetizer is an adhesive.
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that either the alphabetizer does not overbear degeneracy or it is a Cantharellus or both is incorrect it does not hum.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the alphabetizer is not a kind of a humming.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the alphabetizer is not noncurrent.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the alphabetizer is not a humming but it is current.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the busman is not a gun.; sent13 -> int5: the busman does gun.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the alphabetizer is not a current.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the romper is not a current and it is not a inoculator is not right.;
the fact that the Goldsmith is bracteate but it is not stoichiometric is not right.
sent6 -> int9: that the fact that the Goldsmith is bracteate and non-stoichiometric is false is correct if it is current.; sent15 -> int10: if the Goldsmith is not a gun but a humming it is a current.; sent1 -> int11: if the fact that the curd is not temporal is not false that it is a tomograph and it does not parallel Enlightenment is incorrect.; sent22 -> int12: the pocketknife is a scut and it overbears Naemorhedus if it is not caulescent.; sent20 & sent16 -> int13: the kayak does overbear conchfish.; sent7 & int13 -> int14: the kayak is caulescent thing that is not a kind of a Citation.; sent23 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the pocketknife is non-caulescent is right.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the pocketknife is a kind of a scut that does overbear Naemorhedus.; int16 -> int17: the pocketknife is a kind of a scut.; sent10 & int17 -> int18: the curd does not overbear Curietherapy and it is not temporal.; int18 -> int19: the fact that the curd is not a temporal is right.; int11 & int19 -> int20: that the curd is a kind of a tomograph but it does not parallel Enlightenment does not hold.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that that it is a tomograph and does not parallel Enlightenment is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the Goldsmith is bracteate but it is not stoichiometric. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a temporal then the fact that it is a kind of a tomograph and does not parallel Enlightenment is not true. sent2: the romper is stoichiometric but it is noncurrent. sent3: that the alphabetizer is not a humming hold if that either it does overbear degeneracy or it is a Cantharellus or both is wrong. sent4: if the alphabetizer is not a current then that the romper is a current and is not a kind of a inoculator is not right. sent5: if the romper is not unemployable then the Goldsmith is bracteate but it is not stoichiometric. sent6: if something is current that it is bracteate and it is not stoichiometric does not hold. sent7: the kayak is both caulescent and not a Citation if it overbears conchfish. sent8: if the alphabetizer is not a current then the fact that the romper is not current and it is not a inoculator is wrong. sent9: if that something does not overbear degeneracy or it is a kind of a Cantharellus or both is not correct it does not hum. sent10: the curd does not overbear Curietherapy and it is not a kind of a temporal if the pocketknife is a scut. sent11: that the alphabetizer either does not overbear degeneracy or is a kind of a Cantharellus or both is not true. sent12: the fact that the alphabetizer overbears degeneracy is not false. sent13: the busman is a kind of a gun that is a kind of a tomograph. sent14: the busman is not a gun if the alphabetizer does not hum but it is a kind of a current. sent15: something that is not a gun and is a humming is current. sent16: the fact that the kayak does not overbear conchfish and is not chancroidal is wrong. sent17: if the romper is not unemployable then the Goldsmith is bracteate. sent18: the Goldsmith is bracteate. sent19: the Goldsmith is not a gun but it does hum if the busman is not a inoculator. sent20: the kayak overbears conchfish if that it does not overbears conchfish and it is not chancroidal is not true. sent21: if that something does overbear degeneracy or it is a Cantharellus or both is not correct it is not a humming. sent22: something that is not caulescent is a kind of a scut and does overbear Naemorhedus. sent23: if the kayak is caulescent but it is not a kind of a Citation then the pocketknife is not caulescent. sent24: the alphabetizer is an adhesive. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that either the alphabetizer does not overbear degeneracy or it is a Cantharellus or both is incorrect it does not hum.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the alphabetizer is not a kind of a humming.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the alphabetizer is not noncurrent.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the alphabetizer is not a humming but it is current.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the busman is not a gun.; sent13 -> int5: the busman does gun.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the alphabetizer is not a current.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the romper is not a current and it is not a inoculator is not right.; __UNKNOWN__