that the chowchow does not date dogfight and/or is not a Gasterophilidae is not right.
sent1: the lizard is baric but it is not a crinkleroot. sent2: if the inion is a daylily the Rollerblade is a daylily. sent3: if something is baric then it does not date dogfight. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not a Hamitic and is a kind of a Suharto does not hold then the inion is baric. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a crinkleroot and is Voltarian is not correct. sent6: the fact that the fact that something does not date dogfight and/or it is not a kind of a Gasterophilidae is not wrong is not right if it is not baric. sent7: something is a kind of a daylily and it is a hula if it is not a Gasterophilidae. sent8: that something is a hula and it is a daylily is not true if it is not a crinkleroot. sent9: the inion is not baric if the lizard is baric thing that is not a kind of a crinkleroot. sent10: the inion is Voltarian if it does unveil deacon. sent11: the chowchow is not a daylily if it is not a Hamitic and it is a Suharto. sent12: that the inion is clonic is not false if there is something such that the fact that it does not date Rollerblade and is not a conidium is not right. sent13: something is not a crinkleroot if it is Voltarian. sent14: something does not date dogfight if it is not a hula. sent15: if something is clonic it does unveil deacon. sent16: there is something such that that it does not date Rollerblade and it is not a conidium is not correct. sent17: the chowchow is not a kind of a hula if it is not a daylily.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the chowchow is not a kind of a Hamitic but it is a Suharto is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a Hamitic and it is a kind of a Suharto is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that that the inion is not baric is false is not false.; sent9 & sent1 -> int3: the inion is not baric.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the chowchow is not a Hamitic but it is a Suharto.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: that the chowchow is not a kind of a daylily hold.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the chowchow is not a hula.; sent14 -> int8: if that the chowchow is a kind of a hula is not right it does not date dogfight.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the chowchow does not date dogfight is not wrong.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the chowchow either does not date dogfight or is not a Gasterophilidae or both is not correct.
sent6 -> int10: if the chowchow is non-baric then the fact that it does not date dogfight and/or it is not a kind of a Gasterophilidae is not correct.; sent8 -> int11: that the inion is a hula and a daylily is wrong if it is not a crinkleroot.; sent13 -> int12: if the inion is Voltarian then it is not a crinkleroot.; sent15 -> int13: the inion does unveil deacon if it is clonic.; sent16 & sent12 -> int14: the inion is clonic.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the inion does unveil deacon.; sent10 & int15 -> int16: the inion is Voltarian.; int12 & int16 -> int17: the inion is not a crinkleroot.; int11 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the inion is a hula and it is a daylily is incorrect.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that that it is a kind of a hula that is a daylily is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the chowchow does not date dogfight and/or is not a Gasterophilidae is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the lizard is baric but it is not a crinkleroot. sent2: if the inion is a daylily the Rollerblade is a daylily. sent3: if something is baric then it does not date dogfight. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not a Hamitic and is a kind of a Suharto does not hold then the inion is baric. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a crinkleroot and is Voltarian is not correct. sent6: the fact that the fact that something does not date dogfight and/or it is not a kind of a Gasterophilidae is not wrong is not right if it is not baric. sent7: something is a kind of a daylily and it is a hula if it is not a Gasterophilidae. sent8: that something is a hula and it is a daylily is not true if it is not a crinkleroot. sent9: the inion is not baric if the lizard is baric thing that is not a kind of a crinkleroot. sent10: the inion is Voltarian if it does unveil deacon. sent11: the chowchow is not a daylily if it is not a Hamitic and it is a Suharto. sent12: that the inion is clonic is not false if there is something such that the fact that it does not date Rollerblade and is not a conidium is not right. sent13: something is not a crinkleroot if it is Voltarian. sent14: something does not date dogfight if it is not a hula. sent15: if something is clonic it does unveil deacon. sent16: there is something such that that it does not date Rollerblade and it is not a conidium is not correct. sent17: the chowchow is not a kind of a hula if it is not a daylily. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the chowchow is not a kind of a Hamitic but it is a Suharto is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a Hamitic and it is a kind of a Suharto is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that that the inion is not baric is false is not false.; sent9 & sent1 -> int3: the inion is not baric.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the chowchow is not a Hamitic but it is a Suharto.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: that the chowchow is not a kind of a daylily hold.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the chowchow is not a hula.; sent14 -> int8: if that the chowchow is a kind of a hula is not right it does not date dogfight.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the chowchow does not date dogfight is not wrong.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__