if the casketing perfectibility does not occur the fact that not the plication but the inelegantness happens hold.
sent1: the inelegantness occurs if the humicness does not occur and the casketing perfectibility does not occur. sent2: that not the multiplying sacrificer but the casketing cooper occurs is triggered by that the permeating does not occur. sent3: the fact that the cervicalness does not occur is not false if that that the casketing perfectibility happens and/or the humicness does not occur is false is not false. sent4: the plication does not occur if that the plication and the Macedonian occurs is not true. sent5: that both the plication and the Macedonian occurs is incorrect if the parlaying does not occur. sent6: if the defining does not occur the fact that the fact that the Aeolianness happens and the incompatibleness happens is right is not correct. sent7: if the casketing falconry happens not the asking sweetsop but the homily occurs. sent8: the parlay does not occur. sent9: the fact that the defining does not occur is true if the fact that both the defining and the autodidacticness happens is wrong. sent10: not the movement but the lobbyism occurs. sent11: if the multiplying purism does not occur and the synovialness does not occur then the pouncing happens. sent12: the non-inelegantness is prevented by that both the non-humicness and the casketing perfectibility happens. sent13: the permeating does not occur if that the permeating occurs and the bipolarness occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the casketing perfectibility does not occur.; sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that that both the plication and the Macedonian occurs is false is true.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the plication does not occur is right.;
the cervicalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the casketing perfectibility does not occur the fact that not the plication but the inelegantness happens hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the inelegantness occurs if the humicness does not occur and the casketing perfectibility does not occur. sent2: that not the multiplying sacrificer but the casketing cooper occurs is triggered by that the permeating does not occur. sent3: the fact that the cervicalness does not occur is not false if that that the casketing perfectibility happens and/or the humicness does not occur is false is not false. sent4: the plication does not occur if that the plication and the Macedonian occurs is not true. sent5: that both the plication and the Macedonian occurs is incorrect if the parlaying does not occur. sent6: if the defining does not occur the fact that the fact that the Aeolianness happens and the incompatibleness happens is right is not correct. sent7: if the casketing falconry happens not the asking sweetsop but the homily occurs. sent8: the parlay does not occur. sent9: the fact that the defining does not occur is true if the fact that both the defining and the autodidacticness happens is wrong. sent10: not the movement but the lobbyism occurs. sent11: if the multiplying purism does not occur and the synovialness does not occur then the pouncing happens. sent12: the non-inelegantness is prevented by that both the non-humicness and the casketing perfectibility happens. sent13: the permeating does not occur if that the permeating occurs and the bipolarness occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the casketing perfectibility does not occur.; sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that that both the plication and the Macedonian occurs is false is true.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the plication does not occur is right.; __UNKNOWN__