the response is a kind of an earnestness but it is not a kind of a footage.
sent1: the response is not a cerumen. sent2: something is a cerumen. sent3: if something is an earnestness then the fact that the response is not a kind of a footage is not incorrect. sent4: the response is not a footage. sent5: there exists something such that it is an earnestness. sent6: if the caparison is a cerumen that the fact that the response is a kind of an earnestness but it is not a footage does not hold is right. sent7: if something is not holistic then it is a cerumen and is a kind of a monohydrate. sent8: if there is something such that that it is a cerumen hold the response is an earnestness but not a footage. sent9: there is something such that it is a footage.
sent2 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the response is a kind of an earnestness that is not a footage does not hold.
sent7 -> int1: if the caparison is not holistic then it is a cerumen and it is a monohydrate.;
$hypothesis$ = the response is a kind of an earnestness but it is not a kind of a footage. ; $context$ = sent1: the response is not a cerumen. sent2: something is a cerumen. sent3: if something is an earnestness then the fact that the response is not a kind of a footage is not incorrect. sent4: the response is not a footage. sent5: there exists something such that it is an earnestness. sent6: if the caparison is a cerumen that the fact that the response is a kind of an earnestness but it is not a footage does not hold is right. sent7: if something is not holistic then it is a cerumen and is a kind of a monohydrate. sent8: if there is something such that that it is a cerumen hold the response is an earnestness but not a footage. sent9: there is something such that it is a footage. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__