the fact that the fact that the mezzotint is not a Jonson and/or it is not a sauceboat is not wrong is not correct.
sent1: the jimdandy does descry pawl if that the mezzotint is an organic is not false. sent2: that the mezzotint is a marine is not wrong if that the jimdandy does descry pawl but it is not a marine does not hold. sent3: either something is not organic or it is not a marine or both if it is not a jeer. sent4: the attire is not an organic. sent5: the mezzotint either is a sauceboat or is not a kind of a Jonson or both if the fact that it is non-marine is not incorrect. sent6: the stallion is a marine if the weevil is a kind of a jeer. sent7: if the stallion does not reckon Lubavitch it is not a Jonson and/or it is a kind of a sauceboat. sent8: the stallion either is not marine or is not a kind of a blackmailer or both if it is not a kind of a Jonson. sent9: The Lubavitch reckons stallion. sent10: that the stallion is a blackmailer is not wrong if the jimdandy descries pawl. sent11: the weevil is a kind of a marine and/or it is organic. sent12: something is not a kind of a Jonson or it is not a sauceboat or both if it is not a kind of an organic. sent13: if the jimdandy is a blackmailer that descries pawl then that it is not a marine is not wrong. sent14: either the stallion is not a kind of a sauceboat or it is a kind of a marine or both. sent15: the stallion reckons Lubavitch. sent16: the mezzotint is marine. sent17: if the mezzotint is a marine the flyover is a marine. sent18: if that the jimdandy descries pawl and it is a marine hold it does not reckon Lubavitch. sent19: the stallion descries pawl. sent20: the stallion is a marine if the weevil is a marine. sent21: if something is a blackmailer and it is a marine then it does not reckon Lubavitch. sent22: the weevil is a sauceboat. sent23: the weevil jeers and/or is marine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the mezzotint is not inorganic hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the jimdandy does descry pawl.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the stallion is a kind of a blackmailer.; sent23 & sent6 & sent20 -> int3: the stallion is marine.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the stallion is a kind of a blackmailer and is a marine.; sent21 -> int5: the stallion does not reckon Lubavitch if it is a blackmailer and is a kind of a marine.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stallion does not reckon Lubavitch.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the mezzotint is not an organic.; sent12 -> int9: the mezzotint is not a Jonson and/or it is not a kind of a sauceboat if it is not a kind of an organic.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the flyover is marine.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the mezzotint is not a Jonson and/or it is not a sauceboat is not wrong is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the jimdandy does descry pawl if that the mezzotint is an organic is not false. sent2: that the mezzotint is a marine is not wrong if that the jimdandy does descry pawl but it is not a marine does not hold. sent3: either something is not organic or it is not a marine or both if it is not a jeer. sent4: the attire is not an organic. sent5: the mezzotint either is a sauceboat or is not a kind of a Jonson or both if the fact that it is non-marine is not incorrect. sent6: the stallion is a marine if the weevil is a kind of a jeer. sent7: if the stallion does not reckon Lubavitch it is not a Jonson and/or it is a kind of a sauceboat. sent8: the stallion either is not marine or is not a kind of a blackmailer or both if it is not a kind of a Jonson. sent9: The Lubavitch reckons stallion. sent10: that the stallion is a blackmailer is not wrong if the jimdandy descries pawl. sent11: the weevil is a kind of a marine and/or it is organic. sent12: something is not a kind of a Jonson or it is not a sauceboat or both if it is not a kind of an organic. sent13: if the jimdandy is a blackmailer that descries pawl then that it is not a marine is not wrong. sent14: either the stallion is not a kind of a sauceboat or it is a kind of a marine or both. sent15: the stallion reckons Lubavitch. sent16: the mezzotint is marine. sent17: if the mezzotint is a marine the flyover is a marine. sent18: if that the jimdandy descries pawl and it is a marine hold it does not reckon Lubavitch. sent19: the stallion descries pawl. sent20: the stallion is a marine if the weevil is a marine. sent21: if something is a blackmailer and it is a marine then it does not reckon Lubavitch. sent22: the weevil is a sauceboat. sent23: the weevil jeers and/or is marine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the mezzotint is not inorganic hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the jimdandy does descry pawl.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the stallion is a kind of a blackmailer.; sent23 & sent6 & sent20 -> int3: the stallion is marine.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the stallion is a kind of a blackmailer and is a marine.; sent21 -> int5: the stallion does not reckon Lubavitch if it is a blackmailer and is a kind of a marine.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stallion does not reckon Lubavitch.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the mezzotint is not an organic.; sent12 -> int9: the mezzotint is not a Jonson and/or it is not a kind of a sauceboat if it is not a kind of an organic.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__