there is something such that it does articulate ski and it is not a kind of a Carmichael.
sent1: if the turntable is taciturn it is not testaceous and not navigational. sent2: if something does syllogize in-joke it is not a Carmichael. sent3: the couverture does syllogize in-joke. sent4: the turntable is non-testaceous if it is a Carmichael. sent5: the flashover is a Carmichael if the househusband is not monoecious. sent6: if something is not gerundial but it is a kind of a Parisienne then it is extramural. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a circumvention. sent8: if something is not a kind of a Carmichael then the flashover is monoecious. sent9: the couverture is creative. sent10: something is seductive if it does syllogize in-joke. sent11: if that the turntable is seductive is not wrong the couverture is a kind of navigational thing that is not seductive. sent12: the fact that the couverture is not a Carmichael is not false. sent13: if something is non-testaceous and it is not navigational then it is creative. sent14: if the couverture is not creative that the turntable is not taciturn and is not testaceous does not hold. sent15: the couverture does syllogize flashover if the turntable is creative. sent16: the psilophyton does articulate magnetosphere and does not dust. sent17: something is not a Carmichael. sent18: the househusband is testaceous if there exists something such that that it is not taciturn and it is not testaceous does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that it is a kind of a biotype and it is not a Mellon. sent20: the psilophyton syllogizes in-joke. sent21: the househusband does incline. sent22: there exists something such that it is monoecious and not testaceous. sent23: the househusband does syllogize flashover. sent24: that something is not seductive and syllogizes flashover is not right if it is monoecious. sent25: if the couverture does syllogize flashover and is seductive then the fact that the househusband is non-monoecious is true. sent26: that the methapyrilene is taciturn hold. sent27: the couverture is perithelial but it is not a inspissation. sent28: The in-joke does syllogize couverture. sent29: the turntable is taciturn.
sent1 & sent29 -> int1: the turntable is both not testaceous and not navigational.; sent13 -> int2: if the turntable is not testaceous and it is not navigational it is creative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the turntable is creative.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the couverture syllogizes flashover.; sent10 -> int5: the couverture is seductive if it does syllogize in-joke.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the couverture is seductive.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the couverture syllogizes flashover and it is seductive is not incorrect.; int7 & sent25 -> int8: the househusband is not monoecious.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the flashover is a Carmichael.;
the househusband is testaceous.
sent24 -> int10: if the flashover is monoecious the fact that it is not seductive and it syllogizes flashover does not hold.; sent2 -> int11: the psilophyton is not a kind of a Carmichael if it syllogizes in-joke.; int11 & sent20 -> int12: the psilophyton is not a kind of a Carmichael.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is not a Carmichael.; int13 & sent8 -> int14: the flashover is monoecious.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the flashover is not seductive but it does syllogize flashover is not correct.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that that it is not seductive and it does syllogize flashover is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does articulate ski and it is not a kind of a Carmichael. ; $context$ = sent1: if the turntable is taciturn it is not testaceous and not navigational. sent2: if something does syllogize in-joke it is not a Carmichael. sent3: the couverture does syllogize in-joke. sent4: the turntable is non-testaceous if it is a Carmichael. sent5: the flashover is a Carmichael if the househusband is not monoecious. sent6: if something is not gerundial but it is a kind of a Parisienne then it is extramural. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a circumvention. sent8: if something is not a kind of a Carmichael then the flashover is monoecious. sent9: the couverture is creative. sent10: something is seductive if it does syllogize in-joke. sent11: if that the turntable is seductive is not wrong the couverture is a kind of navigational thing that is not seductive. sent12: the fact that the couverture is not a Carmichael is not false. sent13: if something is non-testaceous and it is not navigational then it is creative. sent14: if the couverture is not creative that the turntable is not taciturn and is not testaceous does not hold. sent15: the couverture does syllogize flashover if the turntable is creative. sent16: the psilophyton does articulate magnetosphere and does not dust. sent17: something is not a Carmichael. sent18: the househusband is testaceous if there exists something such that that it is not taciturn and it is not testaceous does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that it is a kind of a biotype and it is not a Mellon. sent20: the psilophyton syllogizes in-joke. sent21: the househusband does incline. sent22: there exists something such that it is monoecious and not testaceous. sent23: the househusband does syllogize flashover. sent24: that something is not seductive and syllogizes flashover is not right if it is monoecious. sent25: if the couverture does syllogize flashover and is seductive then the fact that the househusband is non-monoecious is true. sent26: that the methapyrilene is taciturn hold. sent27: the couverture is perithelial but it is not a inspissation. sent28: The in-joke does syllogize couverture. sent29: the turntable is taciturn. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent29 -> int1: the turntable is both not testaceous and not navigational.; sent13 -> int2: if the turntable is not testaceous and it is not navigational it is creative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the turntable is creative.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the couverture syllogizes flashover.; sent10 -> int5: the couverture is seductive if it does syllogize in-joke.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the couverture is seductive.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the couverture syllogizes flashover and it is seductive is not incorrect.; int7 & sent25 -> int8: the househusband is not monoecious.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the flashover is a Carmichael.; __UNKNOWN__