not the preposing comfortableness but the invigorating occurs.
sent1: the fact that the carposporicness but not the preposing Compositae occurs is incorrect if the lobectomy does not occur. sent2: the puppetry occurs if the example occurs. sent3: the example happens. sent4: the non-retentiveness is caused by that both the example and the uricness occurs. sent5: that the puppetry but not the sprinkle occurs is incorrect if the retentiveness does not occur. sent6: that the puppetry does not occur is triggered by that the sprinkle does not occur. sent7: both the non-uricness and the retentiveness occurs. sent8: the puppetry does not occur if the photostating erythrite happens. sent9: the uricness does not occur. sent10: the lobectomy does not occur if the fact that the lobectomy but not the wowing Wicca occurs is not true. sent11: the preposing comfortableness does not occur if the fact that either the photostating erythrite happens or the sprinkling does not occur or both does not hold. sent12: if the experimentalness occurs the solelessness does not occur. sent13: the photostating wolverine does not occur if the fact that the carposporicness occurs and the preposing Compositae does not occur is wrong. sent14: that the example and the uricness occurs is caused by that the photostating wolverine does not occur. sent15: if the solelessness does not occur the fact that the lobectomy happens and the wowing Wicca does not occur does not hold. sent16: the rhythmicalness does not occur. sent17: the photostating April happens. sent18: the puppetry happens if the photostating erythrite happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the photostating erythrite happens and/or the sprinkling does not occur.; assump1 & sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the puppetry does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the puppetry happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the photostating erythrite occurs or the sprinkle does not occur or both is not correct.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the preposing comfortableness does not occur.; sent7 -> int6: the retentiveness happens.;
the fact that the preposing comfortableness does not occur and the invigorating occurs is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = not the preposing comfortableness but the invigorating occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the carposporicness but not the preposing Compositae occurs is incorrect if the lobectomy does not occur. sent2: the puppetry occurs if the example occurs. sent3: the example happens. sent4: the non-retentiveness is caused by that both the example and the uricness occurs. sent5: that the puppetry but not the sprinkle occurs is incorrect if the retentiveness does not occur. sent6: that the puppetry does not occur is triggered by that the sprinkle does not occur. sent7: both the non-uricness and the retentiveness occurs. sent8: the puppetry does not occur if the photostating erythrite happens. sent9: the uricness does not occur. sent10: the lobectomy does not occur if the fact that the lobectomy but not the wowing Wicca occurs is not true. sent11: the preposing comfortableness does not occur if the fact that either the photostating erythrite happens or the sprinkling does not occur or both does not hold. sent12: if the experimentalness occurs the solelessness does not occur. sent13: the photostating wolverine does not occur if the fact that the carposporicness occurs and the preposing Compositae does not occur is wrong. sent14: that the example and the uricness occurs is caused by that the photostating wolverine does not occur. sent15: if the solelessness does not occur the fact that the lobectomy happens and the wowing Wicca does not occur does not hold. sent16: the rhythmicalness does not occur. sent17: the photostating April happens. sent18: the puppetry happens if the photostating erythrite happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the photostating erythrite happens and/or the sprinkling does not occur.; assump1 & sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the puppetry does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the puppetry happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the photostating erythrite occurs or the sprinkle does not occur or both is not correct.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the preposing comfortableness does not occur.; sent7 -> int6: the retentiveness happens.; __UNKNOWN__