the clarence is not a committedness.
sent1: if the convertible is a kind of a chicken then it is a repairman. sent2: the radioisotope is a Kendal. sent3: if something is a repairman it beats Fuego or is not a kind of an inadequacy or both. sent4: there is something such that it is not a kind of a night. sent5: if something is a Kendal and is not a kind of a night the phaeton is a kind of a lesbian. sent6: if something is not an inadequacy it is a meow and it is a Iranian. sent7: if something does meow then it is a ILO. sent8: the phaeton does splash. sent9: the fact that the phaeton is not an inadequacy is right if the convertible beats Fuego and/or it is not an inadequacy. sent10: there is something such that it is a Kendal and it is a night. sent11: the clarence is a ILO. sent12: if something that is a kind of a committedness is not a kind of a lesbian then the clarence is a splash. sent13: the convertible is a kind of a chicken if the nominator is a chicken. sent14: something is a kind of a committedness if that it is a kind of a splash and it is not a lesbian is not right. sent15: the radioisotope is a Kendal and not a night. sent16: if the radioisotope is not a committedness then the clarence is not a kind of a Kendal. sent17: there exists something such that it is a Kendal. sent18: the radioisotope is not a committedness if the clarence is not a night. sent19: that that the clarence is a kind of a splash but it is not a kind of a lesbian is incorrect is not incorrect if the phaeton is a ILO. sent20: if the phaeton is a lesbian and it splashes then it is not a kind of a ILO. sent21: the nominator enjoys pomegranate if the astrocyte does enjoys pomegranate. sent22: if the phaeton is not a ILO the clarence is not a committedness. sent23: if that the nominator does enjoy pomegranate hold it is a chicken. sent24: if the radioisotope is a night and does splash then it is not a kind of a committedness.
sent15 -> int1: something is a Kendal but not a night.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the phaeton is a lesbian.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the phaeton is a lesbian and a splash is not incorrect.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the phaeton is not a ILO.; int4 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the clarence is a committedness.
sent14 -> int5: if that the clarence is both a splash and not a lesbian does not hold it is a committedness.; sent7 -> int6: the phaeton is a ILO if it meows.; sent6 -> int7: the phaeton is a meow and it is a Iranian if it is not an inadequacy.; sent3 -> int8: if the convertible is a repairman then it beats Fuego or it is not an inadequacy or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the clarence is not a committedness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the convertible is a kind of a chicken then it is a repairman. sent2: the radioisotope is a Kendal. sent3: if something is a repairman it beats Fuego or is not a kind of an inadequacy or both. sent4: there is something such that it is not a kind of a night. sent5: if something is a Kendal and is not a kind of a night the phaeton is a kind of a lesbian. sent6: if something is not an inadequacy it is a meow and it is a Iranian. sent7: if something does meow then it is a ILO. sent8: the phaeton does splash. sent9: the fact that the phaeton is not an inadequacy is right if the convertible beats Fuego and/or it is not an inadequacy. sent10: there is something such that it is a Kendal and it is a night. sent11: the clarence is a ILO. sent12: if something that is a kind of a committedness is not a kind of a lesbian then the clarence is a splash. sent13: the convertible is a kind of a chicken if the nominator is a chicken. sent14: something is a kind of a committedness if that it is a kind of a splash and it is not a lesbian is not right. sent15: the radioisotope is a Kendal and not a night. sent16: if the radioisotope is not a committedness then the clarence is not a kind of a Kendal. sent17: there exists something such that it is a Kendal. sent18: the radioisotope is not a committedness if the clarence is not a night. sent19: that that the clarence is a kind of a splash but it is not a kind of a lesbian is incorrect is not incorrect if the phaeton is a ILO. sent20: if the phaeton is a lesbian and it splashes then it is not a kind of a ILO. sent21: the nominator enjoys pomegranate if the astrocyte does enjoys pomegranate. sent22: if the phaeton is not a ILO the clarence is not a committedness. sent23: if that the nominator does enjoy pomegranate hold it is a chicken. sent24: if the radioisotope is a night and does splash then it is not a kind of a committedness. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: something is a Kendal but not a night.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the phaeton is a lesbian.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the phaeton is a lesbian and a splash is not incorrect.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the phaeton is not a ILO.; int4 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__