the fact that there are unlucky and grateful things does not hold.
sent1: the circumference is grateful. sent2: the Polish vents barrack. sent3: if the Polish does not replay but it is a kind of a Gwydion then the circumference decoys defense. sent4: there exists something such that it does decoy defense. sent5: the spinnaker is a replay. sent6: that the circumference does decoy defense and is a Gwydion is wrong. sent7: the spinnaker is a Gwydion if there is something such that it is grateful. sent8: if the fact that the circumference decoys defense and is not a Gwydion is wrong then the spinnaker is grateful. sent9: that that the Polish is a proline but it is not Jewish is not wrong is wrong. sent10: the poilu does decoy defense. sent11: something is grateful. sent12: the fact that the circumference decoys defense and is not a kind of a Gwydion is not correct. sent13: if there is something such that it does housebreak the spinnaker is unlucky. sent14: the Polish is grateful if something does replay. sent15: the fact that the Polish is a Gwydion but it is not a replay does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that it is unlucky. sent17: the Polish is a replay. sent18: the Polish is not minimal but a replay. sent19: the poilu is grateful. sent20: there are unpardonable and wholesome things. sent21: that something does decoy defense and it is grateful is true. sent22: if the circumference is a kind of a Gwydion the spinnaker is grateful. sent23: if the Polish is not minimal and replays that the poilu does housebreak is true. sent24: the fact that the defense is unlucky is not false.
sent23 & sent18 -> int1: the poilu housebreaks.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does housebreak.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the spinnaker is unlucky.; sent8 & sent12 -> int4: the spinnaker is grateful.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the spinnaker is both unlucky and grateful.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there are unlucky and grateful things does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the circumference is grateful. sent2: the Polish vents barrack. sent3: if the Polish does not replay but it is a kind of a Gwydion then the circumference decoys defense. sent4: there exists something such that it does decoy defense. sent5: the spinnaker is a replay. sent6: that the circumference does decoy defense and is a Gwydion is wrong. sent7: the spinnaker is a Gwydion if there is something such that it is grateful. sent8: if the fact that the circumference decoys defense and is not a Gwydion is wrong then the spinnaker is grateful. sent9: that that the Polish is a proline but it is not Jewish is not wrong is wrong. sent10: the poilu does decoy defense. sent11: something is grateful. sent12: the fact that the circumference decoys defense and is not a kind of a Gwydion is not correct. sent13: if there is something such that it does housebreak the spinnaker is unlucky. sent14: the Polish is grateful if something does replay. sent15: the fact that the Polish is a Gwydion but it is not a replay does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that it is unlucky. sent17: the Polish is a replay. sent18: the Polish is not minimal but a replay. sent19: the poilu is grateful. sent20: there are unpardonable and wholesome things. sent21: that something does decoy defense and it is grateful is true. sent22: if the circumference is a kind of a Gwydion the spinnaker is grateful. sent23: if the Polish is not minimal and replays that the poilu does housebreak is true. sent24: the fact that the defense is unlucky is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent18 -> int1: the poilu housebreaks.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does housebreak.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the spinnaker is unlucky.; sent8 & sent12 -> int4: the spinnaker is grateful.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the spinnaker is both unlucky and grateful.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__