there is something such that it is Eucharistic.
sent1: there exists something such that it is metastable and it does not weld musical. sent2: everything is not a FTO. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not weld musical is not wrong. sent4: there is something such that it does repossess. sent5: the fact that the upset is metastable is true if that the exegete does not destain wool and it is not Eucharistic does not hold. sent6: if that the fact that the upset does not weld musical and is non-Eucharistic is not wrong does not hold then the exegete is metastable. sent7: the upset does not weld musical. sent8: that the exegete is Eucharistic is not false if the upset does weld musical. sent9: if something that is not Eucharistic is not metastable then the exegete welds musical. sent10: the imp is metastable if something does not destain wool and it is not Eucharistic. sent11: everything does not destain wool. sent12: the fact that the upset is a kind of non-metastable thing that does weld musical is not true. sent13: the exegete does weld musical if there is something such that it is not Eucharistic and is metastable. sent14: if the fact that the upset is not Eucharistic and does not weld musical is not right then the exegete is metastable. sent15: the exegete is Eucharistic if that the upset does not weld musical and it does not destain wool is false. sent16: if that the upset is a kind of non-metastable thing that does not weld musical is incorrect then the exegete is Eucharistic. sent17: the imp destains wool if something is non-metastable thing that does weld musical. sent18: the fact that the upset is not technological and does not destain wool is not right. sent19: that the imp is not protrusive and is a Hylocereus is not true. sent20: the fact that the imp does weld musical is correct. sent21: the fact that the gulp is semiotics is correct. sent22: the upset does bid.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the upset is not metastable and does not weld musical.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not metastable and it does not weld musical.; sent11 -> int2: the imp does not destain wool.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is Eucharistic. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is metastable and it does not weld musical. sent2: everything is not a FTO. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not weld musical is not wrong. sent4: there is something such that it does repossess. sent5: the fact that the upset is metastable is true if that the exegete does not destain wool and it is not Eucharistic does not hold. sent6: if that the fact that the upset does not weld musical and is non-Eucharistic is not wrong does not hold then the exegete is metastable. sent7: the upset does not weld musical. sent8: that the exegete is Eucharistic is not false if the upset does weld musical. sent9: if something that is not Eucharistic is not metastable then the exegete welds musical. sent10: the imp is metastable if something does not destain wool and it is not Eucharistic. sent11: everything does not destain wool. sent12: the fact that the upset is a kind of non-metastable thing that does weld musical is not true. sent13: the exegete does weld musical if there is something such that it is not Eucharistic and is metastable. sent14: if the fact that the upset is not Eucharistic and does not weld musical is not right then the exegete is metastable. sent15: the exegete is Eucharistic if that the upset does not weld musical and it does not destain wool is false. sent16: if that the upset is a kind of non-metastable thing that does not weld musical is incorrect then the exegete is Eucharistic. sent17: the imp destains wool if something is non-metastable thing that does weld musical. sent18: the fact that the upset is not technological and does not destain wool is not right. sent19: that the imp is not protrusive and is a Hylocereus is not true. sent20: the fact that the imp does weld musical is correct. sent21: the fact that the gulp is semiotics is correct. sent22: the upset does bid. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the upset is not metastable and does not weld musical.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not metastable and it does not weld musical.; sent11 -> int2: the imp does not destain wool.; __UNKNOWN__