the oleander does respect Dermestidae.
sent1: the oleander is not a AB. sent2: if the oleander is non-bold that the wolfsbane is a kind of hyperthermal thing that does not respect Dermestidae does not hold. sent3: if that the antidiabetic is not a Blida but it is an opera is false the pichi is an opera. sent4: the pichi is bold if the deckle is hypovolemic. sent5: the fact that the deckle is secretory if that the deckle is not syncategorematic and it is not secretory is not right is correct. sent6: something that is not a kind of a AB is hypovolemic thing that is not a mainland. sent7: if the deckle is not a AB it is hypovolemic. sent8: something that does not grouch is a tucked that is a mainland. sent9: something is non-hyperthermal but it is bold if it is not an opera. sent10: the canoeist is not bold if the pichi is a kind of an opera and it is bold. sent11: if the oleander is hypovolemic and not a Blida it is not an opera. sent12: the fact that something does not grouch is true if it is azido. sent13: if the oleander is an opera it respects Dermestidae. sent14: the fact that the fact that something is not a Blida but it is an opera is not wrong is not right if it is a mainland. sent15: something is not a AB if it is not non-secretory. sent16: a non-secretory thing is not a Blida. sent17: that the deckle is not syncategorematic and it is not secretory is not true. sent18: the floe is not a makeshift. sent19: if the canoeist is not a tucked and not secretory then the oleander is not secretory. sent20: the oleander is not bold if the canoeist is not bold. sent21: that something is not unexcitable but it is not a makeshift is incorrect if it is bold. sent22: the floe is excitable but it is not a kind of a makeshift. sent23: if something is non-hyperthermal thing that is bold then it does not respect Dermestidae.
sent21 -> int1: that the floe is excitable and is not a makeshift is false if it is bold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the floe is not non-bold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the floe is a kind of excitable thing that is not a makeshift is incorrect.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the floe is not bold.;
the wolfsbane respects Dermestidae.
sent5 & sent17 -> int5: the deckle is secretory.; sent15 -> int6: the deckle is not a AB if it is secretory.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the deckle is not a AB.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the deckle is not non-hypovolemic.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the pichi is bold.; sent8 -> int10: the icepick does tuck and is a mainland if that it is not a grouch is not wrong.; sent12 -> int11: if the deterioration is azido then that it is not a kind of a grouch hold.; sent14 -> int12: if the antidiabetic is a mainland the fact that it is not a kind of a Blida and is a kind of an opera is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the oleander does respect Dermestidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the oleander is not a AB. sent2: if the oleander is non-bold that the wolfsbane is a kind of hyperthermal thing that does not respect Dermestidae does not hold. sent3: if that the antidiabetic is not a Blida but it is an opera is false the pichi is an opera. sent4: the pichi is bold if the deckle is hypovolemic. sent5: the fact that the deckle is secretory if that the deckle is not syncategorematic and it is not secretory is not right is correct. sent6: something that is not a kind of a AB is hypovolemic thing that is not a mainland. sent7: if the deckle is not a AB it is hypovolemic. sent8: something that does not grouch is a tucked that is a mainland. sent9: something is non-hyperthermal but it is bold if it is not an opera. sent10: the canoeist is not bold if the pichi is a kind of an opera and it is bold. sent11: if the oleander is hypovolemic and not a Blida it is not an opera. sent12: the fact that something does not grouch is true if it is azido. sent13: if the oleander is an opera it respects Dermestidae. sent14: the fact that the fact that something is not a Blida but it is an opera is not wrong is not right if it is a mainland. sent15: something is not a AB if it is not non-secretory. sent16: a non-secretory thing is not a Blida. sent17: that the deckle is not syncategorematic and it is not secretory is not true. sent18: the floe is not a makeshift. sent19: if the canoeist is not a tucked and not secretory then the oleander is not secretory. sent20: the oleander is not bold if the canoeist is not bold. sent21: that something is not unexcitable but it is not a makeshift is incorrect if it is bold. sent22: the floe is excitable but it is not a kind of a makeshift. sent23: if something is non-hyperthermal thing that is bold then it does not respect Dermestidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: that the floe is excitable and is not a makeshift is false if it is bold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the floe is not non-bold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the floe is a kind of excitable thing that is not a makeshift is incorrect.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the floe is not bold.; __UNKNOWN__