the honeycomb is a kind of Afghani thing that is not hipless.
sent1: something that is not a moonstone is both a incapability and not a joule. sent2: the fact that the cachalot is not a kind of a joule and does gauge archbishopric is not true if it is not atrioventricular. sent3: if the cachalot is not lovable that the platelayer is not a moonstone is not false. sent4: if the fact that something does not tag impromptu but it is lovable is correct then it is not a kind of a moonstone. sent5: the fact that something is Afghani but it is not hipless is incorrect if it is not a kind of a moonstone. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is hipless and it does not tag night-sight is correct is not correct then the honeycomb is not hipless. sent7: something is not lovable if it is a joule. sent8: the cachalot is not lovable if it is a joule. sent9: that the fact that the murderee is hipless and it tags night-sight is not false is false. sent10: there are non-lovable things. sent11: that the cachalot is a kind of a joule that does gauge archbishopric is wrong. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is lovable or it is a moonstone or both is wrong the honeycomb tags impromptu. sent13: there exists something such that that it is hipless and it does tag night-sight is false. sent14: if something tags impromptu then the fact that it is Afghani is not false. sent15: the fact that the cachalot is not atrioventricular is not wrong. sent16: if that something is not a joule and does gauge archbishopric is incorrect it is not lovable. sent17: if the cachalot is not lovable that the platelayer is lovable and/or it is a kind of a moonstone does not hold.
sent16 -> int1: if the fact that the cachalot is not a kind of a joule and does gauge archbishopric is not correct it is not lovable.; sent2 & sent15 -> int2: that the cachalot is not a joule but it gauges archbishopric is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cachalot is not lovable.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the platelayer is lovable or it is a kind of a moonstone or both is not true.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is lovable and/or a moonstone is not right.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that the honeycomb does tag impromptu is not incorrect.; sent14 -> int7: if the honeycomb tags impromptu then it is not non-Afghani.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the honeycomb is Afghani.;
the murderee is both a incapability and not a joule.
sent1 -> int9: if the murderee is not a moonstone then it is a incapability and it is not a kind of a joule.; sent4 -> int10: the murderee is not a kind of a moonstone if that it does not tag impromptu and it is lovable hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the honeycomb is a kind of Afghani thing that is not hipless. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a moonstone is both a incapability and not a joule. sent2: the fact that the cachalot is not a kind of a joule and does gauge archbishopric is not true if it is not atrioventricular. sent3: if the cachalot is not lovable that the platelayer is not a moonstone is not false. sent4: if the fact that something does not tag impromptu but it is lovable is correct then it is not a kind of a moonstone. sent5: the fact that something is Afghani but it is not hipless is incorrect if it is not a kind of a moonstone. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is hipless and it does not tag night-sight is correct is not correct then the honeycomb is not hipless. sent7: something is not lovable if it is a joule. sent8: the cachalot is not lovable if it is a joule. sent9: that the fact that the murderee is hipless and it tags night-sight is not false is false. sent10: there are non-lovable things. sent11: that the cachalot is a kind of a joule that does gauge archbishopric is wrong. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is lovable or it is a moonstone or both is wrong the honeycomb tags impromptu. sent13: there exists something such that that it is hipless and it does tag night-sight is false. sent14: if something tags impromptu then the fact that it is Afghani is not false. sent15: the fact that the cachalot is not atrioventricular is not wrong. sent16: if that something is not a joule and does gauge archbishopric is incorrect it is not lovable. sent17: if the cachalot is not lovable that the platelayer is lovable and/or it is a kind of a moonstone does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the fact that the cachalot is not a kind of a joule and does gauge archbishopric is not correct it is not lovable.; sent2 & sent15 -> int2: that the cachalot is not a joule but it gauges archbishopric is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cachalot is not lovable.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the platelayer is lovable or it is a kind of a moonstone or both is not true.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is lovable and/or a moonstone is not right.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that the honeycomb does tag impromptu is not incorrect.; sent14 -> int7: if the honeycomb tags impromptu then it is not non-Afghani.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the honeycomb is Afghani.; __UNKNOWN__