the washstand is a cool.
sent1: The inexperience does turf pawpaw. sent2: the washstand is not cool if the pawpaw is not a ordainer. sent3: that something is not a ordainer and is a knot does not hold if it does not turf inexperience. sent4: if something turfs Purus then it turfs flasher. sent5: everything is a freshman. sent6: something turfs flasher if it is a ordainer. sent7: the pawpaw does turf inexperience. sent8: the washstand galumphs and it does turf Atreus. sent9: something that is not a ordainer is a kind of a cool. sent10: if something does not turf flasher it does not turf inexperience. sent11: if that something is not a ordainer but it knots is wrong then it does not knots. sent12: the washstand is a ordainer. sent13: the washstand is a celibacy and it is a ordainer. sent14: the adapter does not turf flasher if the pawpaw is a ordainer and it turfs inexperience. sent15: if the pawpaw is cool it turfs inexperience. sent16: everything turfs Purus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pawpaw is a ordainer.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the pawpaw is a ordainer and it does turf inexperience.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the adapter does not turf flasher.; sent4 -> int3: the adapter does turf flasher if the fact that it does turf Purus is correct.; sent16 -> int4: the adapter does turf Purus.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the adapter does turf flasher.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the pawpaw is not a ordainer.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the sidelight does not knot.
sent11 -> int8: if the fact that the sidelight is not a ordainer but it knots is wrong it is not a knots.; sent3 -> int9: the fact that the sidelight is both not a ordainer and a knot is not right if it does not turf inexperience.; sent10 -> int10: the sidelight does not turf inexperience if it does not turf flasher.;
$hypothesis$ = the washstand is a cool. ; $context$ = sent1: The inexperience does turf pawpaw. sent2: the washstand is not cool if the pawpaw is not a ordainer. sent3: that something is not a ordainer and is a knot does not hold if it does not turf inexperience. sent4: if something turfs Purus then it turfs flasher. sent5: everything is a freshman. sent6: something turfs flasher if it is a ordainer. sent7: the pawpaw does turf inexperience. sent8: the washstand galumphs and it does turf Atreus. sent9: something that is not a ordainer is a kind of a cool. sent10: if something does not turf flasher it does not turf inexperience. sent11: if that something is not a ordainer but it knots is wrong then it does not knots. sent12: the washstand is a ordainer. sent13: the washstand is a celibacy and it is a ordainer. sent14: the adapter does not turf flasher if the pawpaw is a ordainer and it turfs inexperience. sent15: if the pawpaw is cool it turfs inexperience. sent16: everything turfs Purus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pawpaw is a ordainer.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the pawpaw is a ordainer and it does turf inexperience.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the adapter does not turf flasher.; sent4 -> int3: the adapter does turf flasher if the fact that it does turf Purus is correct.; sent16 -> int4: the adapter does turf Purus.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the adapter does turf flasher.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the pawpaw is not a ordainer.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__