that the dragonhead does not enjoy Microdesmidae is incorrect.
sent1: if the dragonhead is a simian or it is flaky or both it is non-prolusory. sent2: the third-rater is not simian if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not flaky and a simian is not true. sent3: the third-rater is not flaky if there is something such that the fact that it is both dualistic and not flaky is false. sent4: something is revocable if the fact that it is an ode hold. sent5: the stander is not revocable. sent6: if the dragonhead is flaky it is not prolusory. sent7: if that the dragonhead is not a kind of an ode and it is not revocable is incorrect it is not a familiar. sent8: the third-rater is dualistic. sent9: the oscitancy is a kind of a familiar that is an ode if it does not snuffle dinar. sent10: if something is revocable the bomblet is prolusory and dualistic. sent11: if the dragonhead is not a simian the third-rater is not dualistic. sent12: the oscitancy does not snuffle dinar. sent13: if the dragonhead is not prolusory the fact that it is both not an ode and not revocable is incorrect. sent14: that the Stilton is not flaky but it is simian does not hold if the bomblet is dualistic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dragonhead is not a kind of a simian.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the third-rater is not dualistic.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dragonhead is a simian is true.; int3 -> int4: the dragonhead is either simian or flaky or both.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the dragonhead is not prolusory.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the fact that the dragonhead is not a kind of an ode and it is not revocable is not correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the dragonhead is not a familiar.;
that the third-rater is non-flaky hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the dragonhead does not enjoy Microdesmidae is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dragonhead is a simian or it is flaky or both it is non-prolusory. sent2: the third-rater is not simian if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not flaky and a simian is not true. sent3: the third-rater is not flaky if there is something such that the fact that it is both dualistic and not flaky is false. sent4: something is revocable if the fact that it is an ode hold. sent5: the stander is not revocable. sent6: if the dragonhead is flaky it is not prolusory. sent7: if that the dragonhead is not a kind of an ode and it is not revocable is incorrect it is not a familiar. sent8: the third-rater is dualistic. sent9: the oscitancy is a kind of a familiar that is an ode if it does not snuffle dinar. sent10: if something is revocable the bomblet is prolusory and dualistic. sent11: if the dragonhead is not a simian the third-rater is not dualistic. sent12: the oscitancy does not snuffle dinar. sent13: if the dragonhead is not prolusory the fact that it is both not an ode and not revocable is incorrect. sent14: that the Stilton is not flaky but it is simian does not hold if the bomblet is dualistic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dragonhead is not a kind of a simian.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the third-rater is not dualistic.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dragonhead is a simian is true.; int3 -> int4: the dragonhead is either simian or flaky or both.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the dragonhead is not prolusory.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the fact that the dragonhead is not a kind of an ode and it is not revocable is not correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the dragonhead is not a familiar.; __UNKNOWN__