the fact that the sandpaper is a goldmine and it is a Rocroi is not right.
sent1: the Lauder is not a Kivu. sent2: the sandpaper is a Rocroi and is a goldmine if the salvager is not a Rocroi. sent3: if the fact that the Lauder is a habited is correct then the fact that the salvager is not a birdnest is incorrect. sent4: either something is a kind of an eclipse or it is a Kivu or both. sent5: the Lauder is both not non-veinal and a Rocroi. sent6: the Lauder does not accelerate aculeus. sent7: if something that is a kind of a habited is a birdnest it is not a kind of a goldmine. sent8: the salvager is not Gallican. sent9: if there is something such that it is a Kivu then the salvager is an eclipse. sent10: the salvager is not a birdnest but it trolls devisal. sent11: the fact that if something that is a kind of a habited is a kind of an eclipse then that it is not a kind of a birdnest is not wrong is not incorrect. sent12: the salvager is an eclipse if there exists something such that it eclipse and/or it is a Kivu. sent13: if the fact that the salvager is not a goldmine is not wrong then the sandpaper is a goldmine and it is a Rocroi. sent14: if the Lauder accelerates aculeus and it is a birdnest it is unfaithful. sent15: if the sandpaper is not unfaithful and is a kind of a goldmine it is a Rocroi. sent16: if something is a kind of a goldmine and it habits then it is not an eclipse. sent17: if the Lauder does not accelerate aculeus but it birdnests it is unfaithful. sent18: if the salvager is a goldmine that is an eclipse then it is not a birdnest. sent19: that the Lauder is a birdnest and a Rocroi is true if the sandpaper is not a kind of a birdnest. sent20: the sandpaper is not a habited. sent21: the salvager does not accelerate aculeus. sent22: the salvager is a kind of a habited if the Lauder is unfaithful. sent23: the Lauder does not accelerate aculeus but it is a kind of a birdnest. sent24: if the salvager is not a kind of a goldmine then that the sandpaper is a kind of a goldmine is not incorrect. sent25: the sandpaper is a goldmine. sent26: the fact that something is a habited and is not unfaithful is not correct if it is a goldmine.
sent17 & sent23 -> int1: the Lauder is unfaithful.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the fact that the salvager is a kind of a habited hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the salvager is a goldmine.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the salvager is a goldmine and it is a kind of a habited.; sent16 -> int4: if the salvager is a goldmine and it does habit it is not an eclipse.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the salvager is not an eclipse.; sent4 & sent12 -> int6: the salvager is an eclipse.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the salvager is not a goldmine.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the blank is not a Rocroi.
sent26 -> int9: if the Lauder is a goldmine that it does habit and it is faithful does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sandpaper is a goldmine and it is a Rocroi is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the Lauder is not a Kivu. sent2: the sandpaper is a Rocroi and is a goldmine if the salvager is not a Rocroi. sent3: if the fact that the Lauder is a habited is correct then the fact that the salvager is not a birdnest is incorrect. sent4: either something is a kind of an eclipse or it is a Kivu or both. sent5: the Lauder is both not non-veinal and a Rocroi. sent6: the Lauder does not accelerate aculeus. sent7: if something that is a kind of a habited is a birdnest it is not a kind of a goldmine. sent8: the salvager is not Gallican. sent9: if there is something such that it is a Kivu then the salvager is an eclipse. sent10: the salvager is not a birdnest but it trolls devisal. sent11: the fact that if something that is a kind of a habited is a kind of an eclipse then that it is not a kind of a birdnest is not wrong is not incorrect. sent12: the salvager is an eclipse if there exists something such that it eclipse and/or it is a Kivu. sent13: if the fact that the salvager is not a goldmine is not wrong then the sandpaper is a goldmine and it is a Rocroi. sent14: if the Lauder accelerates aculeus and it is a birdnest it is unfaithful. sent15: if the sandpaper is not unfaithful and is a kind of a goldmine it is a Rocroi. sent16: if something is a kind of a goldmine and it habits then it is not an eclipse. sent17: if the Lauder does not accelerate aculeus but it birdnests it is unfaithful. sent18: if the salvager is a goldmine that is an eclipse then it is not a birdnest. sent19: that the Lauder is a birdnest and a Rocroi is true if the sandpaper is not a kind of a birdnest. sent20: the sandpaper is not a habited. sent21: the salvager does not accelerate aculeus. sent22: the salvager is a kind of a habited if the Lauder is unfaithful. sent23: the Lauder does not accelerate aculeus but it is a kind of a birdnest. sent24: if the salvager is not a kind of a goldmine then that the sandpaper is a kind of a goldmine is not incorrect. sent25: the sandpaper is a goldmine. sent26: the fact that something is a habited and is not unfaithful is not correct if it is a goldmine. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent23 -> int1: the Lauder is unfaithful.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the fact that the salvager is a kind of a habited hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the salvager is a goldmine.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the salvager is a goldmine and it is a kind of a habited.; sent16 -> int4: if the salvager is a goldmine and it does habit it is not an eclipse.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the salvager is not an eclipse.; sent4 & sent12 -> int6: the salvager is an eclipse.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the salvager is not a goldmine.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__