that the alprazolam is both not cytological and an inset is wrong.
sent1: something that is not a Chinese is synchronous and not an inset. sent2: that the alprazolam is non-illegible thing that does not spend Pluteus does not hold if the sticktight is not a kind of an inset. sent3: if the hardwood is not a kind of an infernal then the fact that it either does rehabilitate dam or does not vulcanize or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that the limonite is not Chinese and it is not illegible is wrong. sent5: if the limonite does spend Pluteus that the alprazolam is not cytological but it does inset is not incorrect. sent6: the limonite does not spend Jacobinism. sent7: the fact that the sticktight is not an inset hold if the dogbane is synchronous but it does not inset. sent8: the alprazolam is an inset if the limonite does spend Pluteus. sent9: the fact that the limonite is cytological hold if the sticktight spends Jacobinism. sent10: the alprazolam does inset. sent11: the limonite is cytolytic if it does not spend Jacobinism. sent12: the dogbane either is illegible or is cytolytic or both. sent13: that the limonite does spend Jacobinism and is cytological is not true if the alprazolam is not cytolytic. sent14: if the fact that the limonite spends Jacobinism and is cytological is false the accelerator is not cytological. sent15: The Jacobinism does not spend limonite. sent16: if something that does not spend Pluteus is cytolytic it is not illegible. sent17: if that the fact that the limonite is both not Chinese and not illegible is not true is true then it is illegible.
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: the limonite is cytolytic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the limonite does not spend Pluteus.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the limonite does not spend Pluteus but it is cytolytic.; sent16 -> int3: if the limonite does not spend Pluteus but it is cytolytic it is not illegible.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the limonite is not illegible.; sent17 & sent4 -> int5: the limonite is illegible.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the limonite spends Pluteus hold.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the accelerator is not cytological.
sent1 -> int8: if the dogbane is not Chinese it is synchronous and it is not a kind of an inset.;
$hypothesis$ = that the alprazolam is both not cytological and an inset is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a Chinese is synchronous and not an inset. sent2: that the alprazolam is non-illegible thing that does not spend Pluteus does not hold if the sticktight is not a kind of an inset. sent3: if the hardwood is not a kind of an infernal then the fact that it either does rehabilitate dam or does not vulcanize or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that the limonite is not Chinese and it is not illegible is wrong. sent5: if the limonite does spend Pluteus that the alprazolam is not cytological but it does inset is not incorrect. sent6: the limonite does not spend Jacobinism. sent7: the fact that the sticktight is not an inset hold if the dogbane is synchronous but it does not inset. sent8: the alprazolam is an inset if the limonite does spend Pluteus. sent9: the fact that the limonite is cytological hold if the sticktight spends Jacobinism. sent10: the alprazolam does inset. sent11: the limonite is cytolytic if it does not spend Jacobinism. sent12: the dogbane either is illegible or is cytolytic or both. sent13: that the limonite does spend Jacobinism and is cytological is not true if the alprazolam is not cytolytic. sent14: if the fact that the limonite spends Jacobinism and is cytological is false the accelerator is not cytological. sent15: The Jacobinism does not spend limonite. sent16: if something that does not spend Pluteus is cytolytic it is not illegible. sent17: if that the fact that the limonite is both not Chinese and not illegible is not true is true then it is illegible. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: the limonite is cytolytic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the limonite does not spend Pluteus.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the limonite does not spend Pluteus but it is cytolytic.; sent16 -> int3: if the limonite does not spend Pluteus but it is cytolytic it is not illegible.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the limonite is not illegible.; sent17 & sent4 -> int5: the limonite is illegible.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the limonite spends Pluteus hold.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__