that the grass is a feline and/or is an affecting is wrong.
sent1: that the grass does offset grapeshot and it is a yawning is incorrect. sent2: something does not subtilize if the fact that it is a choler and it is not a kind of a lass is not right. sent3: that the grass does not affect but it does offset Aramaic is not true. sent4: if that something offsets grapeshot is not incorrect then it does affect. sent5: if the grass does offset grapeshot then the fact that the benzene does subtilize and yawns is wrong. sent6: the benzene subtilizes. sent7: the grass affects if that it offsets grapeshot is not incorrect. sent8: if the fact that something does not offset grapeshot and is a kind of a yawning is incorrect it is an affecting. sent9: the benzene is an affecting. sent10: if the benzene subtilizes the fact that the grass offsets grapeshot and it yawns is not right. sent11: the fact that the grass does not offset grapeshot and yawns does not hold if the benzene does subtilize. sent12: the fact that the fact that the benzene does not offset grapeshot but it is a kind of an affecting is not correct is not false if the grass subtilizes.
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: that the fact that the fact that the grass does not offset grapeshot and does yawn is not wrong is incorrect hold.; sent8 -> int2: the grass is a kind of an affecting if that it does not offset grapeshot and it is a yawning is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the grass is an affecting.; int3 -> hypothesis;
that either the grass is a kind of a feline or it does affect or both is wrong.
sent2 -> int4: the grass does not subtilize if that it is a choler and it is not a lass does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the grass is a feline and/or is an affecting is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the grass does offset grapeshot and it is a yawning is incorrect. sent2: something does not subtilize if the fact that it is a choler and it is not a kind of a lass is not right. sent3: that the grass does not affect but it does offset Aramaic is not true. sent4: if that something offsets grapeshot is not incorrect then it does affect. sent5: if the grass does offset grapeshot then the fact that the benzene does subtilize and yawns is wrong. sent6: the benzene subtilizes. sent7: the grass affects if that it offsets grapeshot is not incorrect. sent8: if the fact that something does not offset grapeshot and is a kind of a yawning is incorrect it is an affecting. sent9: the benzene is an affecting. sent10: if the benzene subtilizes the fact that the grass offsets grapeshot and it yawns is not right. sent11: the fact that the grass does not offset grapeshot and yawns does not hold if the benzene does subtilize. sent12: the fact that the fact that the benzene does not offset grapeshot but it is a kind of an affecting is not correct is not false if the grass subtilizes. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: that the fact that the fact that the grass does not offset grapeshot and does yawn is not wrong is incorrect hold.; sent8 -> int2: the grass is a kind of an affecting if that it does not offset grapeshot and it is a yawning is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the grass is an affecting.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__