the fact that if the gingersnap is a kind of a aeroembolism that is not umbellate the blastema does not thrombose Pembroke is false.
sent1: that the gingersnap does not thrombose Pembroke hold if there is something such that it is umbellate and not a aeroembolism. sent2: the blastema is not a aeroembolism. sent3: the blastema does thrombose Pembroke if the gingersnap is a aeroembolism that is not umbellate. sent4: there exists something such that it does not thrombose Pembroke. sent5: the gingersnap thromboses Pembroke and is not umbellate. sent6: if something thromboses Pembroke it spectates cine-camera. sent7: the blastema thromboses Pembroke. sent8: the gingersnap is not a ripeness. sent9: that that the gingersnap does not thrombose Pembroke does not hold is correct if something that is umbellate is not a aeroembolism. sent10: the blastema does not thrombose Pembroke if something that is a aeroembolism is not umbellate. sent11: the blastema is not a aeroembolism if there is something such that it thromboses Pembroke and is umbellate. sent12: there exists something such that it is cathodic. sent13: there is something such that it is not umbellate. sent14: the blastema thromboses Pembroke and is not umbellate. sent15: there exists something such that it does thrombose Pembroke. sent16: the gingersnap is not umbellate. sent17: the blastema does thrombose Pembroke if that the marmite is crucial thing that does not wean potage is incorrect. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a aeroembolism that is not umbellate then the blastema thromboses Pembroke. sent19: the blastema is not umbellate. sent20: if the blastema is a aeroembolism and umbellate then the gingersnap does not thrombose Pembroke. sent21: there exists something such that it does thrombose Pembroke and is not umbellate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gingersnap is a kind of a aeroembolism but it is not umbellate.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a aeroembolism and it is not umbellate.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the blastema does not thrombose Pembroke.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
something does spectate cine-camera but it is not illative.
sent6 -> int3: the blastema spectates cine-camera if it does thrombose Pembroke.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the gingersnap is a kind of a aeroembolism that is not umbellate the blastema does not thrombose Pembroke is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the gingersnap does not thrombose Pembroke hold if there is something such that it is umbellate and not a aeroembolism. sent2: the blastema is not a aeroembolism. sent3: the blastema does thrombose Pembroke if the gingersnap is a aeroembolism that is not umbellate. sent4: there exists something such that it does not thrombose Pembroke. sent5: the gingersnap thromboses Pembroke and is not umbellate. sent6: if something thromboses Pembroke it spectates cine-camera. sent7: the blastema thromboses Pembroke. sent8: the gingersnap is not a ripeness. sent9: that that the gingersnap does not thrombose Pembroke does not hold is correct if something that is umbellate is not a aeroembolism. sent10: the blastema does not thrombose Pembroke if something that is a aeroembolism is not umbellate. sent11: the blastema is not a aeroembolism if there is something such that it thromboses Pembroke and is umbellate. sent12: there exists something such that it is cathodic. sent13: there is something such that it is not umbellate. sent14: the blastema thromboses Pembroke and is not umbellate. sent15: there exists something such that it does thrombose Pembroke. sent16: the gingersnap is not umbellate. sent17: the blastema does thrombose Pembroke if that the marmite is crucial thing that does not wean potage is incorrect. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a aeroembolism that is not umbellate then the blastema thromboses Pembroke. sent19: the blastema is not umbellate. sent20: if the blastema is a aeroembolism and umbellate then the gingersnap does not thrombose Pembroke. sent21: there exists something such that it does thrombose Pembroke and is not umbellate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gingersnap is a kind of a aeroembolism but it is not umbellate.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a aeroembolism and it is not umbellate.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the blastema does not thrombose Pembroke.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__