if the smith is heavy the CEO is transpolar.
sent1: the taper is not transpolar. sent2: the taper is not a Nerthus if the CEO is not transpolar. sent3: the taper is not a draftsman and is not foliaceous. sent4: the MAOI is not a Nerthus. sent5: the smith is not transpolar. sent6: the fact that the smith is a transplant is correct. sent7: if that the CEO is not transpolar is true the fact that the taper does not grease filibuster and is not a Nerthus hold. sent8: the taper is not heavy. sent9: the smith is non-heavy if the taper does not grease filibuster and is not a kind of a Nerthus. sent10: that the taper is not a kind of a Nerthus hold. sent11: the smith is a refresher. sent12: the CEO does grease filibuster. sent13: the taper is not a kind of a Nerthus and is not a heavy. sent14: the fact that the sirloin is a Nerthus is true. sent15: the ephemeron is not transpolar. sent16: the smith is a Nerthus. sent17: the smith does not grease filibuster if the taper is both not a Nerthus and not heavy. sent18: if the CEO is transpolar the taper does not grease filibuster and it is not a kind of a Nerthus. sent19: the CEO is both not a Nerthus and not a heavy if the smith is non-transpolar. sent20: if the taper does not grease filibuster and is a Nerthus the smith is not heavy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the CEO is not transpolar is not incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the taper does not grease filibuster and is not a kind of a Nerthus.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the smith is not heavy.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the smith is a heavy.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the CEO is transpolar.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the smith is heavy the CEO is transpolar. ; $context$ = sent1: the taper is not transpolar. sent2: the taper is not a Nerthus if the CEO is not transpolar. sent3: the taper is not a draftsman and is not foliaceous. sent4: the MAOI is not a Nerthus. sent5: the smith is not transpolar. sent6: the fact that the smith is a transplant is correct. sent7: if that the CEO is not transpolar is true the fact that the taper does not grease filibuster and is not a Nerthus hold. sent8: the taper is not heavy. sent9: the smith is non-heavy if the taper does not grease filibuster and is not a kind of a Nerthus. sent10: that the taper is not a kind of a Nerthus hold. sent11: the smith is a refresher. sent12: the CEO does grease filibuster. sent13: the taper is not a kind of a Nerthus and is not a heavy. sent14: the fact that the sirloin is a Nerthus is true. sent15: the ephemeron is not transpolar. sent16: the smith is a Nerthus. sent17: the smith does not grease filibuster if the taper is both not a Nerthus and not heavy. sent18: if the CEO is transpolar the taper does not grease filibuster and it is not a kind of a Nerthus. sent19: the CEO is both not a Nerthus and not a heavy if the smith is non-transpolar. sent20: if the taper does not grease filibuster and is a Nerthus the smith is not heavy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the CEO is not transpolar is not incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the taper does not grease filibuster and is not a kind of a Nerthus.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the smith is not heavy.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the smith is a heavy.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the CEO is transpolar.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__