the ultraviolet does not occur.
sent1: the dictating Ruscus triggers either the non-estuarineness or that the apocalypse does not occur or both. sent2: if the fact that the apocalypse does not occur and the details does not occur does not hold then that the ultraviolet does not occur is not false. sent3: that the details happens is prevented by the non-estuarineness. sent4: if the estuarineness occurs or the dictating Ruscus does not occur or both then the fact that the still does not occur hold. sent5: the extracellularness does not occur. sent6: that the amitoticness but not the extracellularness happens leads to that the still occurs. sent7: if the kind happens then the seeping alb does not occur. sent8: the millennialness happens and the unsexiness happens if the sagging Machiavellianism does not occur. sent9: the meatlessness happens and/or the tolerance occurs. sent10: if the snapping happens the fact that the endoparasiticness does not occur and the seeping ytterbium occurs is not correct. sent11: the papering does not occur. sent12: the sagging Machiavellianism does not occur if the fact that the non-endoparasiticness and the seeping ytterbium happens is wrong. sent13: the remise happens. sent14: that the estuarineness occurs and/or the dictating Ruscus does not occur hold if the millennialness does not occur. sent15: the fact that the sagging Ceratopogonidae does not occur and the sagging fogbank does not occur is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the seeping passing happens hold. sent17: the innocuousness does not occur. sent18: the seeping Darrow does not occur if that the research does not occur and the pteridologicalness does not occur is not true. sent19: the friction happens. sent20: the dictating Ruscus happens if the millennialness happens. sent21: the millennialness does not occur. sent22: that the apocalypse does not occur and the detailing does not occur is not correct if the amitoticness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amitoticness happens.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the amitoticness occurs and the extracellularness does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the still happens.; sent14 & sent21 -> int3: the estuarineness occurs and/or the dictating Ruscus does not occur.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the still does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the amitoticness does not occur.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the fact that the apocalypse does not occur and the details does not occur is not correct.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the ultraviolet happens.
$hypothesis$ = the ultraviolet does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the dictating Ruscus triggers either the non-estuarineness or that the apocalypse does not occur or both. sent2: if the fact that the apocalypse does not occur and the details does not occur does not hold then that the ultraviolet does not occur is not false. sent3: that the details happens is prevented by the non-estuarineness. sent4: if the estuarineness occurs or the dictating Ruscus does not occur or both then the fact that the still does not occur hold. sent5: the extracellularness does not occur. sent6: that the amitoticness but not the extracellularness happens leads to that the still occurs. sent7: if the kind happens then the seeping alb does not occur. sent8: the millennialness happens and the unsexiness happens if the sagging Machiavellianism does not occur. sent9: the meatlessness happens and/or the tolerance occurs. sent10: if the snapping happens the fact that the endoparasiticness does not occur and the seeping ytterbium occurs is not correct. sent11: the papering does not occur. sent12: the sagging Machiavellianism does not occur if the fact that the non-endoparasiticness and the seeping ytterbium happens is wrong. sent13: the remise happens. sent14: that the estuarineness occurs and/or the dictating Ruscus does not occur hold if the millennialness does not occur. sent15: the fact that the sagging Ceratopogonidae does not occur and the sagging fogbank does not occur is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the seeping passing happens hold. sent17: the innocuousness does not occur. sent18: the seeping Darrow does not occur if that the research does not occur and the pteridologicalness does not occur is not true. sent19: the friction happens. sent20: the dictating Ruscus happens if the millennialness happens. sent21: the millennialness does not occur. sent22: that the apocalypse does not occur and the detailing does not occur is not correct if the amitoticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amitoticness happens.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the amitoticness occurs and the extracellularness does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the still happens.; sent14 & sent21 -> int3: the estuarineness occurs and/or the dictating Ruscus does not occur.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the still does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the amitoticness does not occur.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the fact that the apocalypse does not occur and the details does not occur is not correct.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__