that the panache does not repair bib-and-tucker but it repairs acculturation is wrong.
sent1: something is not a kind of a last if the fact that it does not fear tradecraft and it last does not hold. sent2: that that the latitudinarian is imperceptible and non-last is not incorrect is false if the panache is imperceptible. sent3: the gorge does repair bib-and-tucker. sent4: something does not fear Antony if it is last. sent5: the topaz repairs habitability if the derivation is not a last and it does not fear Antony. sent6: that the panache repairs bib-and-tucker and it repairs acculturation is not correct. sent7: if something does repair habitability the fact that it is imperceptible is right. sent8: there is something such that that it is urceolate and it does not repair Curtiss is not true. sent9: that if that the topaz fears tradecraft and it is a gent is not correct then the derivation is not a attosecond is right. sent10: if something lasts it is imperceptible. sent11: if the fact that something is imperceptible but it does not last does not hold then it does not fear Antony. sent12: the fact that the topaz does fear tradecraft and it is a gent is false if the latitudinarian does not fear Antony. sent13: the fact that the panache does grumble but it is not thyrotoxic does not hold if the fact that the latitudinarian is imperceptible hold. sent14: the derivation is both a attosecond and impressive if the hermaphrodite is not an empathy. sent15: the fact that if there is something such that that it is urceolate and it does not repair Curtiss is not true then the fact that the hermaphrodite is not an empathy is not false is not false. sent16: if that the topaz does repair habitability is not wrong the latitudinarian is imperceptible. sent17: the fact that the derivation does not fear tradecraft but it is a last does not hold if the hermaphrodite is not a attosecond. sent18: if the panache does not repair bib-and-tucker but it does repair acculturation then it repairs habitability. sent19: that the Geordie is not impressive but it is an empathy is wrong. sent20: if there is something such that that it is not impressive and it is an empathy is incorrect the hermaphrodite is not a attosecond. sent21: if the hermaphrodite is not an empathy then the fact that the derivation is impressive is not wrong. sent22: if there exists something such that it is not urceolate then the hermaphrodite is not an empathy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the panache does not repair bib-and-tucker and does repair acculturation.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the panache does repair habitability.; sent7 -> int2: the panache is imperceptible if it repairs habitability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panache is imperceptible.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the latitudinarian is imperceptible but it is not a last is not right.; sent11 -> int5: the latitudinarian does not fear Antony if the fact that it is a kind of imperceptible thing that is not a last is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the latitudinarian does not fear Antony.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that the topaz does fear tradecraft and it is a gent is wrong.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the derivation is not a attosecond.; sent8 & sent15 -> int9: the hermaphrodite is not an empathy.; sent14 & int9 -> int10: the derivation is a attosecond and impressive.; int10 -> int11: the derivation is a attosecond.; int8 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the panache does not repair bib-and-tucker but it does repair acculturation.
sent1 -> int13: if the fact that the derivation does not fear tradecraft but it lasts is false then it is lasts.; sent19 -> int14: there exists something such that that it is a kind of unimpressive thing that is an empathy does not hold.; int14 & sent20 -> int15: the hermaphrodite is not a attosecond.; sent17 & int15 -> int16: that the derivation does not fear tradecraft but it is last does not hold.; int13 & int16 -> int17: the derivation does not last.;
$hypothesis$ = that the panache does not repair bib-and-tucker but it repairs acculturation is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a last if the fact that it does not fear tradecraft and it last does not hold. sent2: that that the latitudinarian is imperceptible and non-last is not incorrect is false if the panache is imperceptible. sent3: the gorge does repair bib-and-tucker. sent4: something does not fear Antony if it is last. sent5: the topaz repairs habitability if the derivation is not a last and it does not fear Antony. sent6: that the panache repairs bib-and-tucker and it repairs acculturation is not correct. sent7: if something does repair habitability the fact that it is imperceptible is right. sent8: there is something such that that it is urceolate and it does not repair Curtiss is not true. sent9: that if that the topaz fears tradecraft and it is a gent is not correct then the derivation is not a attosecond is right. sent10: if something lasts it is imperceptible. sent11: if the fact that something is imperceptible but it does not last does not hold then it does not fear Antony. sent12: the fact that the topaz does fear tradecraft and it is a gent is false if the latitudinarian does not fear Antony. sent13: the fact that the panache does grumble but it is not thyrotoxic does not hold if the fact that the latitudinarian is imperceptible hold. sent14: the derivation is both a attosecond and impressive if the hermaphrodite is not an empathy. sent15: the fact that if there is something such that that it is urceolate and it does not repair Curtiss is not true then the fact that the hermaphrodite is not an empathy is not false is not false. sent16: if that the topaz does repair habitability is not wrong the latitudinarian is imperceptible. sent17: the fact that the derivation does not fear tradecraft but it is a last does not hold if the hermaphrodite is not a attosecond. sent18: if the panache does not repair bib-and-tucker but it does repair acculturation then it repairs habitability. sent19: that the Geordie is not impressive but it is an empathy is wrong. sent20: if there is something such that that it is not impressive and it is an empathy is incorrect the hermaphrodite is not a attosecond. sent21: if the hermaphrodite is not an empathy then the fact that the derivation is impressive is not wrong. sent22: if there exists something such that it is not urceolate then the hermaphrodite is not an empathy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the panache does not repair bib-and-tucker and does repair acculturation.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the panache does repair habitability.; sent7 -> int2: the panache is imperceptible if it repairs habitability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panache is imperceptible.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the latitudinarian is imperceptible but it is not a last is not right.; sent11 -> int5: the latitudinarian does not fear Antony if the fact that it is a kind of imperceptible thing that is not a last is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the latitudinarian does not fear Antony.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that the topaz does fear tradecraft and it is a gent is wrong.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the derivation is not a attosecond.; sent8 & sent15 -> int9: the hermaphrodite is not an empathy.; sent14 & int9 -> int10: the derivation is a attosecond and impressive.; int10 -> int11: the derivation is a attosecond.; int8 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__