the travestying centralism occurs if the quarantining occurs.
sent1: the Anglican does not occur if the inspiratoriness does not occur. sent2: if both the non-Anglicanness and the quarantining happens then the travestying centralism happens. sent3: that the clanking Ziziphus occurs hold. sent4: the inspiratoriness does not occur.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the Anglican does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quarantine occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the non-Anglicanness and the quarantining happens.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the travestying centralism happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the travestying centralism occurs if the quarantining occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the Anglican does not occur if the inspiratoriness does not occur. sent2: if both the non-Anglicanness and the quarantining happens then the travestying centralism happens. sent3: that the clanking Ziziphus occurs hold. sent4: the inspiratoriness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the Anglican does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quarantine occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the non-Anglicanness and the quarantining happens.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the travestying centralism happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__