that there exists something such that if the fact that it does resent tutorial and does not resent Crateva is not right then it does not mutate Anthony is not right.
sent1: if that the monstrosity does not resent tutorial is not wrong it does not mutate Anthony. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it does resent tutorial and does resent Crateva does not hold it does not mutate Anthony. sent3: the outflow is not reputable if it is a kind of a Danton and it is not a fumigator. sent4: if the monstrosity does resent tutorial but it does not resent Crateva it does not mutate Anthony. sent5: that the monstrosity mutates Anthony is not incorrect if the fact that it resents tutorial and does not resent Crateva is not correct. sent6: if the fact that that the monstrosity resents tutorial and resents Crateva does not hold hold it does not mutate Anthony. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not resent tutorial then it does not mutate Anthony is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it does overbear trifle and does not overbear changer is false then it is not a call-back. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a pit then it is not a kind of a witch-hunt. sent10: the fact that the monstrosity does not mutate Anthony is not incorrect if that it resents tutorial and it does not resent Crateva is not true. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it resents tutorial and it does not resent Crateva does not hold it mutates Anthony. sent12: there is something such that if it does resent Crateva then it does not mutate Anthony. sent13: there exists something such that if it does resent tutorial and does not resent Crateva then that it does not mutate Anthony is right. sent14: the fact that the monstrosity is not armorial is not incorrect if the fact that it resents Nanak and is not a sweatsuit does not hold. sent15: something is not a collar if that it is heliocentric and does not mutate Garrick does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it does taper and it is not detachable is false the fact that it does not laicize is not false. sent17: there exists something such that if the fact that it overbears Midi and does not resent Lawton is not correct then it does not leach.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is heliocentric and it does not mutate Garrick is not right it is not a collar.
sent15 -> int1: if that the great-uncle is heliocentric but it does not mutate Garrick is incorrect it is not a collar.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it does resent tutorial and does not resent Crateva is not right then it does not mutate Anthony is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the monstrosity does not resent tutorial is not wrong it does not mutate Anthony. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it does resent tutorial and does resent Crateva does not hold it does not mutate Anthony. sent3: the outflow is not reputable if it is a kind of a Danton and it is not a fumigator. sent4: if the monstrosity does resent tutorial but it does not resent Crateva it does not mutate Anthony. sent5: that the monstrosity mutates Anthony is not incorrect if the fact that it resents tutorial and does not resent Crateva is not correct. sent6: if the fact that that the monstrosity resents tutorial and resents Crateva does not hold hold it does not mutate Anthony. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not resent tutorial then it does not mutate Anthony is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it does overbear trifle and does not overbear changer is false then it is not a call-back. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a pit then it is not a kind of a witch-hunt. sent10: the fact that the monstrosity does not mutate Anthony is not incorrect if that it resents tutorial and it does not resent Crateva is not true. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it resents tutorial and it does not resent Crateva does not hold it mutates Anthony. sent12: there is something such that if it does resent Crateva then it does not mutate Anthony. sent13: there exists something such that if it does resent tutorial and does not resent Crateva then that it does not mutate Anthony is right. sent14: the fact that the monstrosity is not armorial is not incorrect if the fact that it resents Nanak and is not a sweatsuit does not hold. sent15: something is not a collar if that it is heliocentric and does not mutate Garrick does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it does taper and it is not detachable is false the fact that it does not laicize is not false. sent17: there exists something such that if the fact that it overbears Midi and does not resent Lawton is not correct then it does not leach. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__