the fact that the achondroplasticness does not occur is not incorrect if the underlying does not occur.
sent1: the wrangling happens if both the non-westness and the ratcheting happens. sent2: if the west happens then the fact that the settling does not occur and the flattening fireplug does not occur is incorrect. sent3: the statisticalness occurs. sent4: the flattening fireplug does not occur. sent5: the sweat happens. sent6: that not the settling but the flattening fireplug occurs is not right. sent7: the non-achondroplasticness is prevented by that the wrangling happens and the underlying does not occur. sent8: that the support does not occur causes that the ratcheting occurs and the sweat occurs. sent9: the achondroplasticness is brought about by that the underlying does not occur. sent10: the supporting does not occur. sent11: the flattening fireplug does not occur if the statisticalness happens. sent12: the statisticalness results in that the settling does not occur and the flattening fireplug does not occur. sent13: the non-structuralness and the non-westness happens if the ratcheting does not occur. sent14: the achondroplasticness does not occur if the underlying occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the west occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the settling does not occur and the flattening fireplug does not occur is false.; sent12 & sent3 -> int2: the settling does not occur and the flattening fireplug does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the westness does not occur is not wrong.; sent8 & sent10 -> int5: the ratchet happens and the sweat occurs.; int5 -> int6: the ratchet occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the west does not occur and the ratcheting occurs.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the wrangling occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the underlying does not occur.; int8 & assump2 -> int9: the wrangling occurs and the underlying does not occur.;
the structuralness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the achondroplasticness does not occur is not incorrect if the underlying does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the wrangling happens if both the non-westness and the ratcheting happens. sent2: if the west happens then the fact that the settling does not occur and the flattening fireplug does not occur is incorrect. sent3: the statisticalness occurs. sent4: the flattening fireplug does not occur. sent5: the sweat happens. sent6: that not the settling but the flattening fireplug occurs is not right. sent7: the non-achondroplasticness is prevented by that the wrangling happens and the underlying does not occur. sent8: that the support does not occur causes that the ratcheting occurs and the sweat occurs. sent9: the achondroplasticness is brought about by that the underlying does not occur. sent10: the supporting does not occur. sent11: the flattening fireplug does not occur if the statisticalness happens. sent12: the statisticalness results in that the settling does not occur and the flattening fireplug does not occur. sent13: the non-structuralness and the non-westness happens if the ratcheting does not occur. sent14: the achondroplasticness does not occur if the underlying occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the west occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the settling does not occur and the flattening fireplug does not occur is false.; sent12 & sent3 -> int2: the settling does not occur and the flattening fireplug does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the westness does not occur is not wrong.; sent8 & sent10 -> int5: the ratchet happens and the sweat occurs.; int5 -> int6: the ratchet occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the west does not occur and the ratcheting occurs.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the wrangling occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the underlying does not occur.; int8 & assump2 -> int9: the wrangling occurs and the underlying does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__