the fact that there exists something such that that it does not multiply pul and/or is not noncompetitive is wrong is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that that it does not patronage Provo and/or does poultice Gelsemium is wrong. sent2: something is not competitive. sent3: the overcompensation is not lexicostatistic if the poorwill does not poultice acre-foot and is traceable. sent4: if the boneshaker is not a kind of a Montreal it is not competitive. sent5: if something does not patronage Provo it is not a Montreal. sent6: that something either does not multiply pul or is competitive or both is not right if it is not a Montreal. sent7: if the fact that the boneshaker is external and it poultices Gelsemium is incorrect then it does not patronage Provo. sent8: the fact that the boneshaker is an external and it does poultice Gelsemium is not right. sent9: that something is competitive and/or it does not multiply pul does not hold if that it is not lexicostatistic is not false. sent10: there is something such that it multiplies pul. sent11: if the hands is not competitive either the boneshaker does patronage Provo or it is not a Montreal or both. sent12: that if the fact that the overcompensation is competitive or does not multiply pul or both does not hold then the hands is not competitive is true. sent13: something that is not a nostalgia and/or is a cascade does not multiply mulch. sent14: there is something such that that either it does multiply pul or it is competitive or both is wrong. sent15: the poorwill does not poultice acre-foot and it is not untraceable if it does not multiply mulch.
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the boneshaker does not patronage Provo.; sent5 -> int2: that the boneshaker is not a Montreal is true if it does not patronage Provo.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the boneshaker is not a kind of a Montreal.; sent6 -> int4: that that the boneshaker does not multiply pul and/or is competitive is incorrect if the boneshaker is not a Montreal is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the boneshaker does not multiply pul and/or is competitive is not correct.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the helmet does not patronage camisole hold.
sent9 -> int6: the fact that the overcompensation either is competitive or does not multiply pul or both is incorrect if it is not lexicostatistic.; sent13 -> int7: if either the poorwill is not a nostalgia or it is a cascade or both then that it does not multiply mulch is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it does not multiply pul and/or is not noncompetitive is wrong is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it does not patronage Provo and/or does poultice Gelsemium is wrong. sent2: something is not competitive. sent3: the overcompensation is not lexicostatistic if the poorwill does not poultice acre-foot and is traceable. sent4: if the boneshaker is not a kind of a Montreal it is not competitive. sent5: if something does not patronage Provo it is not a Montreal. sent6: that something either does not multiply pul or is competitive or both is not right if it is not a Montreal. sent7: if the fact that the boneshaker is external and it poultices Gelsemium is incorrect then it does not patronage Provo. sent8: the fact that the boneshaker is an external and it does poultice Gelsemium is not right. sent9: that something is competitive and/or it does not multiply pul does not hold if that it is not lexicostatistic is not false. sent10: there is something such that it multiplies pul. sent11: if the hands is not competitive either the boneshaker does patronage Provo or it is not a Montreal or both. sent12: that if the fact that the overcompensation is competitive or does not multiply pul or both does not hold then the hands is not competitive is true. sent13: something that is not a nostalgia and/or is a cascade does not multiply mulch. sent14: there is something such that that either it does multiply pul or it is competitive or both is wrong. sent15: the poorwill does not poultice acre-foot and it is not untraceable if it does not multiply mulch. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the boneshaker does not patronage Provo.; sent5 -> int2: that the boneshaker is not a Montreal is true if it does not patronage Provo.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the boneshaker is not a kind of a Montreal.; sent6 -> int4: that that the boneshaker does not multiply pul and/or is competitive is incorrect if the boneshaker is not a Montreal is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the boneshaker does not multiply pul and/or is competitive is not correct.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__