the commercial occurs.
sent1: if the fact that the triumph occurs but the shearing does not occur does not hold then the shearing occurs. sent2: the mass does not occur. sent3: that the biologisticness but not the syllogizing lari occurs triggers the non-Hasidicness. sent4: if not the remonstrating insole but the pilot occurs the tow happens. sent5: that the deep-sea does not occur but the syllogizing centerfielder happens is not right. sent6: the syllogizing proposal does not occur if the fact that the deep-sea does not occur and the syllogizing centerfielder does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the pogonip happens that the unawaresness does not occur and the syllogizing dovekie does not occur does not hold. sent8: not the syllogizing proposal but the calculating happens if the tow occurs. sent9: the diocesanness does not occur. sent10: if the calculating occurs then the fact that the deep-sea but not the syllogizing centerfielder occurs is not right. sent11: the fact that either the remonstrating insole happens or the towing does not occur or both is incorrect if the syllogizing proposal does not occur. sent12: if the syllogizing tartlet does not occur the unportableness does not occur and the down-bow does not occur. sent13: if the Hasidicness does not occur not the theming visiting but the sibilation occurs. sent14: that the deep-sea does not occur and the syllogizing centerfielder does not occur is not right if the calculating happens. sent15: the syllogizing tartlet does not occur if not the theming visiting but the sibilation occurs. sent16: that the pilot does not occur is right if that either the remonstrating insole happens or the towing happens or both is incorrect. sent17: if that the planning does not occur is not incorrect the presiding and the libation happens. sent18: that the syllogizing proposal does not occur yields the towing. sent19: if the syllogizing proposal does not occur but the calculating happens then the commercialness occurs. sent20: if the fact that the remonstrating insole happens and/or the tow does not occur is not right the pilot does not occur. sent21: the pilot happens if the presiding does not occur. sent22: if that the calculating does not occur hold the commercialness does not occur. sent23: the presiding does not occur and the libation does not occur. sent24: if the shearing happens the separating does not occur and the planning does not occur. sent25: the fact that the triumph happens and the shearing does not occur is not right if the unportableness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calculating occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the deep-seaness does not occur and the syllogizing centerfielder does not occur is wrong hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the syllogizing proposal does not occur.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the remonstrating insole occurs and/or the towing does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: that the pilot does not occur is not incorrect.; sent23 -> int5: the presiding does not occur.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the pilot occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the calculating does not occur.; int8 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the commercialness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the commercial occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the triumph occurs but the shearing does not occur does not hold then the shearing occurs. sent2: the mass does not occur. sent3: that the biologisticness but not the syllogizing lari occurs triggers the non-Hasidicness. sent4: if not the remonstrating insole but the pilot occurs the tow happens. sent5: that the deep-sea does not occur but the syllogizing centerfielder happens is not right. sent6: the syllogizing proposal does not occur if the fact that the deep-sea does not occur and the syllogizing centerfielder does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the pogonip happens that the unawaresness does not occur and the syllogizing dovekie does not occur does not hold. sent8: not the syllogizing proposal but the calculating happens if the tow occurs. sent9: the diocesanness does not occur. sent10: if the calculating occurs then the fact that the deep-sea but not the syllogizing centerfielder occurs is not right. sent11: the fact that either the remonstrating insole happens or the towing does not occur or both is incorrect if the syllogizing proposal does not occur. sent12: if the syllogizing tartlet does not occur the unportableness does not occur and the down-bow does not occur. sent13: if the Hasidicness does not occur not the theming visiting but the sibilation occurs. sent14: that the deep-sea does not occur and the syllogizing centerfielder does not occur is not right if the calculating happens. sent15: the syllogizing tartlet does not occur if not the theming visiting but the sibilation occurs. sent16: that the pilot does not occur is right if that either the remonstrating insole happens or the towing happens or both is incorrect. sent17: if that the planning does not occur is not incorrect the presiding and the libation happens. sent18: that the syllogizing proposal does not occur yields the towing. sent19: if the syllogizing proposal does not occur but the calculating happens then the commercialness occurs. sent20: if the fact that the remonstrating insole happens and/or the tow does not occur is not right the pilot does not occur. sent21: the pilot happens if the presiding does not occur. sent22: if that the calculating does not occur hold the commercialness does not occur. sent23: the presiding does not occur and the libation does not occur. sent24: if the shearing happens the separating does not occur and the planning does not occur. sent25: the fact that the triumph happens and the shearing does not occur is not right if the unportableness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calculating occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the deep-seaness does not occur and the syllogizing centerfielder does not occur is wrong hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the syllogizing proposal does not occur.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the remonstrating insole occurs and/or the towing does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: that the pilot does not occur is not incorrect.; sent23 -> int5: the presiding does not occur.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the pilot occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the calculating does not occur.; int8 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__