that the sniffing happens if the behavior happens is not true.
sent1: if the caulescentness occurs the obtaining occurs. sent2: that both the non-psychologicalness and the earlessness occurs prevents the non-metallicness. sent3: the buccalness does not occur. sent4: if that the puritanicalness does not occur hold the multiphaseness happens. sent5: that the laboring Ming happens and the Bulgarian occurs is brought about by that the metallic does not occur. sent6: the scanning does not occur. sent7: if the fact that not the spending inula but the albuminuricness happens is true the compromise occurs. sent8: that the incalculableness occurs is triggered by the shipping. sent9: that both the metallicness and the Bulgarianness happens prevents the behavior. sent10: the insinuation does not occur and the gnawing occurs. sent11: the Frankishness occurs. sent12: the earlessness occurs. sent13: the non-psychologicalness and the earlessness happens. sent14: that the behavior does not occur is prevented by that the metallicness happens and the Bulgarian happens. sent15: if the Bulgarian does not occur then the sniffing occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the behavior happens.; sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the metallic happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Bulgarian happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the metallicness and the Bulgarian happens.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the behavior does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the Bulgarian does not occur.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the sniff happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the laboring Ming happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the sniffing happens if the behavior happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the caulescentness occurs the obtaining occurs. sent2: that both the non-psychologicalness and the earlessness occurs prevents the non-metallicness. sent3: the buccalness does not occur. sent4: if that the puritanicalness does not occur hold the multiphaseness happens. sent5: that the laboring Ming happens and the Bulgarian occurs is brought about by that the metallic does not occur. sent6: the scanning does not occur. sent7: if the fact that not the spending inula but the albuminuricness happens is true the compromise occurs. sent8: that the incalculableness occurs is triggered by the shipping. sent9: that both the metallicness and the Bulgarianness happens prevents the behavior. sent10: the insinuation does not occur and the gnawing occurs. sent11: the Frankishness occurs. sent12: the earlessness occurs. sent13: the non-psychologicalness and the earlessness happens. sent14: that the behavior does not occur is prevented by that the metallicness happens and the Bulgarian happens. sent15: if the Bulgarian does not occur then the sniffing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the behavior happens.; sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the metallic happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Bulgarian happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the metallicness and the Bulgarian happens.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the behavior does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the Bulgarian does not occur.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the sniff happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__