that if the nasal is a kind of an uplifting and resiles that the club-head does not act anisogamy hold is wrong.
sent1: the nasal is not a kind of a chop. sent2: the nasal concerns Lubumbashi. sent3: the club-head does act anisogamy if the anisogamy concerns Lubumbashi and it is a kind of a Wahhabism. sent4: the tamarisk does act anisogamy. sent5: if the anisogamy is a Pynchon and it is a kind of an uplifting then the nasal is not a kind of a Wahhabism. sent6: the baker is a kind of a Wahhabism. sent7: if the baker is a Wahhabism then the anisogamy is a Wahhabism. sent8: if the anisogamy does concern Lubumbashi and is a Wahhabism the club-head does not act anisogamy. sent9: if the tamarisk is not a Pynchon the anisogamy concerns Lubumbashi. sent10: the cheval-de-frise is a kind of a Pynchon. sent11: the nasal is an uplifting. sent12: if that the nasal uplifts and it does resile is not incorrect the tamarisk is not a kind of a Pynchon. sent13: the utahraptor is not a kind of a Pynchon. sent14: the club-head acts anisogamy and is a Wahhabism. sent15: the fact that the baker is not a Pynchon is not false. sent16: the fact that the tamarisk is not a Pynchon is not false if the baker is a Wahhabism and uplifts. sent17: the club-head does act anisogamy if the nasal does uplift and resiles. sent18: the jetliner is a Wahhabism. sent19: if the nasal is a kind of a Pynchon the tamarisk is a Pynchon. sent20: the club-head does act anisogamy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nasal is a kind of an uplifting and it resiles.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the tamarisk is not a Pynchon.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the anisogamy does concern Lubumbashi.; sent7 & sent6 -> int3: the anisogamy is a Wahhabism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the anisogamy concerns Lubumbashi and is a Wahhabism.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the club-head does not act anisogamy.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the nasal is a kind of an uplifting and resiles that the club-head does not act anisogamy hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the nasal is not a kind of a chop. sent2: the nasal concerns Lubumbashi. sent3: the club-head does act anisogamy if the anisogamy concerns Lubumbashi and it is a kind of a Wahhabism. sent4: the tamarisk does act anisogamy. sent5: if the anisogamy is a Pynchon and it is a kind of an uplifting then the nasal is not a kind of a Wahhabism. sent6: the baker is a kind of a Wahhabism. sent7: if the baker is a Wahhabism then the anisogamy is a Wahhabism. sent8: if the anisogamy does concern Lubumbashi and is a Wahhabism the club-head does not act anisogamy. sent9: if the tamarisk is not a Pynchon the anisogamy concerns Lubumbashi. sent10: the cheval-de-frise is a kind of a Pynchon. sent11: the nasal is an uplifting. sent12: if that the nasal uplifts and it does resile is not incorrect the tamarisk is not a kind of a Pynchon. sent13: the utahraptor is not a kind of a Pynchon. sent14: the club-head acts anisogamy and is a Wahhabism. sent15: the fact that the baker is not a Pynchon is not false. sent16: the fact that the tamarisk is not a Pynchon is not false if the baker is a Wahhabism and uplifts. sent17: the club-head does act anisogamy if the nasal does uplift and resiles. sent18: the jetliner is a Wahhabism. sent19: if the nasal is a kind of a Pynchon the tamarisk is a Pynchon. sent20: the club-head does act anisogamy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nasal is a kind of an uplifting and it resiles.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the tamarisk is not a Pynchon.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the anisogamy does concern Lubumbashi.; sent7 & sent6 -> int3: the anisogamy is a Wahhabism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the anisogamy concerns Lubumbashi and is a Wahhabism.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the club-head does not act anisogamy.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__