the fact that the altostratus occurs if the acousticness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the lymphaticness does not occur if the altostratus happens but the intervention does not occur. sent2: if the colloguing smallholder does not occur then that the lymphaticness but not the intervention occurs is not true. sent3: the fact that both the non-lymphaticness and the intervention happens is incorrect if the colloguing smallholder does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the eradication happens and the colloguing smallholder occurs is wrong then the eradication does not occur. sent5: that both the acoustic and the eradication occurs is wrong. sent6: if the germinating occurs the colloguing lycopene occurs. sent7: that the peripheralness occurs is caused by the minstreling firehouse. sent8: the fact that the colloguing smallholder does not occur if the fact that the non-acousticness and the eradication happens is incorrect is not false. sent9: the colloguing vanadium occurs. sent10: if the fact that the lymphaticness does not occur and the intervention does not occur does not hold then the altostratus happens. sent11: that not the acoustic but the eradication happens prevents that the colloguing smallholder occurs. sent12: that both the non-lymphaticness and the intervention occurs is not right. sent13: that the lymphaticness but not the intervention happens does not hold. sent14: the fact that both the eradication and the colloguing smallholder occurs does not hold if the lymphaticness does not occur. sent15: both the quoting and the acoustic happens if the eradication does not occur. sent16: the colloguing lycopene triggers that the altostratus but not the intervention occurs. sent17: if the colloguing smallholder does not occur the fact that the lymphaticness does not occur and the intervention does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the acousticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-acousticness and the eradication occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the acousticness does not occur is true.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that not the acousticness but the eradication happens is not right.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the colloguing smallholder does not occur.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the fact that that the lymphaticness does not occur and the intervention does not occur is not false is not right.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the altostratus occurs.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the quoting happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the altostratus occurs if the acousticness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the lymphaticness does not occur if the altostratus happens but the intervention does not occur. sent2: if the colloguing smallholder does not occur then that the lymphaticness but not the intervention occurs is not true. sent3: the fact that both the non-lymphaticness and the intervention happens is incorrect if the colloguing smallholder does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the eradication happens and the colloguing smallholder occurs is wrong then the eradication does not occur. sent5: that both the acoustic and the eradication occurs is wrong. sent6: if the germinating occurs the colloguing lycopene occurs. sent7: that the peripheralness occurs is caused by the minstreling firehouse. sent8: the fact that the colloguing smallholder does not occur if the fact that the non-acousticness and the eradication happens is incorrect is not false. sent9: the colloguing vanadium occurs. sent10: if the fact that the lymphaticness does not occur and the intervention does not occur does not hold then the altostratus happens. sent11: that not the acoustic but the eradication happens prevents that the colloguing smallholder occurs. sent12: that both the non-lymphaticness and the intervention occurs is not right. sent13: that the lymphaticness but not the intervention happens does not hold. sent14: the fact that both the eradication and the colloguing smallholder occurs does not hold if the lymphaticness does not occur. sent15: both the quoting and the acoustic happens if the eradication does not occur. sent16: the colloguing lycopene triggers that the altostratus but not the intervention occurs. sent17: if the colloguing smallholder does not occur the fact that the lymphaticness does not occur and the intervention does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the acousticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-acousticness and the eradication occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the acousticness does not occur is true.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that not the acousticness but the eradication happens is not right.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the colloguing smallholder does not occur.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the fact that that the lymphaticness does not occur and the intervention does not occur is not false is not right.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the altostratus occurs.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__