the graffito extinguishes bunker and is a kind of a ferricyanide.
sent1: the fact that the graffito is not a kind of a fuschia is not incorrect if there is something such that it is not Balzacian. sent2: the drainboard is lathery if the Jezebel is extrusive. sent3: if the operator is not an umbra it is sensorineural and it is interlocutory. sent4: if the fact that something is not a fuschia is not wrong then it extinguishes bunker and it is a ferricyanide. sent5: the operator is not an umbra. sent6: if that the Jezebel is not interlocutory and is lathery is incorrect then it is interlocutory. sent7: the Jezebel is a ferricyanide and a countryman. sent8: the Jezebel is nonfinancial and it is extrusive if it is not sensorineural. sent9: if the Jezebel is not extrusive then that the Capsicum is a kind of Balzacian a countryman is wrong. sent10: that something is a kind of non-interlocutory thing that is lathery is not correct if it is a countryman. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of Balzacian a countryman is incorrect the graffito is not a fuschia.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jezebel is extrusive.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the drainboard is lathery.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the operator is sensorineural and it is interlocutory.; int2 -> int3: the operator is sensorineural.; sent4 -> int4: the graffito extinguishes bunker and is a ferricyanide if it is not a fuschia.;
the Jezebel is a kind of interlocutory thing that is nonfinancial.
sent10 -> int5: if the Jezebel is a kind of a countryman the fact that it is non-interlocutory and it is lathery is wrong.; sent7 -> int6: the Jezebel is a countryman.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the Jezebel is not interlocutory but it is lathery is not true.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the Jezebel is interlocutory.;
$hypothesis$ = the graffito extinguishes bunker and is a kind of a ferricyanide. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the graffito is not a kind of a fuschia is not incorrect if there is something such that it is not Balzacian. sent2: the drainboard is lathery if the Jezebel is extrusive. sent3: if the operator is not an umbra it is sensorineural and it is interlocutory. sent4: if the fact that something is not a fuschia is not wrong then it extinguishes bunker and it is a ferricyanide. sent5: the operator is not an umbra. sent6: if that the Jezebel is not interlocutory and is lathery is incorrect then it is interlocutory. sent7: the Jezebel is a ferricyanide and a countryman. sent8: the Jezebel is nonfinancial and it is extrusive if it is not sensorineural. sent9: if the Jezebel is not extrusive then that the Capsicum is a kind of Balzacian a countryman is wrong. sent10: that something is a kind of non-interlocutory thing that is lathery is not correct if it is a countryman. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of Balzacian a countryman is incorrect the graffito is not a fuschia. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jezebel is extrusive.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the drainboard is lathery.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the operator is sensorineural and it is interlocutory.; int2 -> int3: the operator is sensorineural.; sent4 -> int4: the graffito extinguishes bunker and is a ferricyanide if it is not a fuschia.; __UNKNOWN__