the fact that not the magnetizing security but the mercifulness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: if the cancan does not occur the one-stepping does not occur. sent2: the abjuring langlaufer does not occur. sent3: that the frosting and the unsocialness happens is wrong if the autoeciousness does not occur. sent4: that both the autoeciousness and the mercifulness occurs is brought about by the non-unsocialness. sent5: the cytokineticness does not occur if the fact that both the frosting and the unsocialness occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the native does not occur the fact that the magnetizing security does not occur and the mercifulness occurs is false. sent7: the criticizing outpost occurs if the frost happens. sent8: if the fact that both the non-alternatingness and the chalybeateness happens is incorrect the autoeciousness does not occur. sent9: the autoeciousness does not occur if the alternatingness happens. sent10: if the unsocialness does not occur the autoeciousness happens and the frost occurs. sent11: the alternating does not occur. sent12: the avianness occurs. sent13: that both the alternating and the chalybeateness occurs prevents the native. sent14: the native does not occur if the non-alternatingness and the chalybeateness happens. sent15: the fact that the magnetizing captain does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: that the abjuring langlaufer does not occur triggers that the cytokineticness happens and the magnetizing scout occurs. sent17: the frost prevents the magnetizing security.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that not the alternatingness but the chalybeateness happens is not false does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the autoeciousness does not occur is correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the frosting happens and the unsocialness occurs does not hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the cytokineticness does not occur.; sent16 & sent2 -> int4: the cytokineticness and the magnetizing scout occurs.; int4 -> int5: the cytokineticness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the alternatingness does not occur but the chalybeateness happens.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the native does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
not the magnetizing security but the mercifulness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the magnetizing security but the mercifulness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cancan does not occur the one-stepping does not occur. sent2: the abjuring langlaufer does not occur. sent3: that the frosting and the unsocialness happens is wrong if the autoeciousness does not occur. sent4: that both the autoeciousness and the mercifulness occurs is brought about by the non-unsocialness. sent5: the cytokineticness does not occur if the fact that both the frosting and the unsocialness occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the native does not occur the fact that the magnetizing security does not occur and the mercifulness occurs is false. sent7: the criticizing outpost occurs if the frost happens. sent8: if the fact that both the non-alternatingness and the chalybeateness happens is incorrect the autoeciousness does not occur. sent9: the autoeciousness does not occur if the alternatingness happens. sent10: if the unsocialness does not occur the autoeciousness happens and the frost occurs. sent11: the alternating does not occur. sent12: the avianness occurs. sent13: that both the alternating and the chalybeateness occurs prevents the native. sent14: the native does not occur if the non-alternatingness and the chalybeateness happens. sent15: the fact that the magnetizing captain does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: that the abjuring langlaufer does not occur triggers that the cytokineticness happens and the magnetizing scout occurs. sent17: the frost prevents the magnetizing security. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that not the alternatingness but the chalybeateness happens is not false does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the autoeciousness does not occur is correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the frosting happens and the unsocialness occurs does not hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the cytokineticness does not occur.; sent16 & sent2 -> int4: the cytokineticness and the magnetizing scout occurs.; int4 -> int5: the cytokineticness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the alternatingness does not occur but the chalybeateness happens.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the native does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__