the sundial is flats and it does absent.
sent1: if there is something such that it is illogical then the fact that the malfeasant is not heteroecious but unsinkable is not true. sent2: if there exists something such that it beholds practicability the sundial is not a Kuwait. sent3: there exists something such that it is illogical. sent4: something is a thromboplastin if it is polymorphous. sent5: the kapuka is doubles and/or does behold practicability. sent6: if the trichloroethylene does not manage then the Southerner does not double and does not misdeal. sent7: if that something is a walk or it is heteroecious or both is not wrong then that the sundial is a kind of a obiism hold. sent8: something absents if that it is not a kind of a Kuwait is not incorrect. sent9: the sundial is not a flats if the kapuka is not absent and is not a Kuwait. sent10: the stewpan is rustless. sent11: the trichloroethylene is a fare. sent12: the sundial is not a Kuwait if either something is not non-doubles or it does behold practicability or both. sent13: something that is a kind of a obiism is flats. sent14: if the fact that the trichloroethylene fares hold the fact that it is not sclerotic and it does manage is not true. sent15: the haik is a Meany if something that is not a obiism does walk. sent16: the malfeasant is a walk. sent17: the fact that the kapuka is non-heteroecious a walk does not hold if it is a obiism. sent18: the haik is unsinkable if the fact that the malfeasant is non-heteroecious thing that is unsinkable does not hold. sent19: if that something is not sclerotic and manages is not correct it does not manages. sent20: the kapuka does not behold practicability if something that is not a kind of a doubles does not misdeal.
sent16 -> int1: either the malfeasant is a walk or it is heteroecious or both.; int1 -> int2: something does walk or it is heteroecious or both.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the sundial is a obiism.; sent13 -> int4: if the sundial is a obiism then it is flats.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sundial is a flats.; sent8 -> int6: the sundial does absent if it is not a kind of a Kuwait.; sent5 -> int7: something is a doubles or it does behold practicability or both.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the sundial is not a Kuwait.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the sundial is absent.; int5 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sundial is both flats and absent is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the sundial is flats and it does absent. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is illogical then the fact that the malfeasant is not heteroecious but unsinkable is not true. sent2: if there exists something such that it beholds practicability the sundial is not a Kuwait. sent3: there exists something such that it is illogical. sent4: something is a thromboplastin if it is polymorphous. sent5: the kapuka is doubles and/or does behold practicability. sent6: if the trichloroethylene does not manage then the Southerner does not double and does not misdeal. sent7: if that something is a walk or it is heteroecious or both is not wrong then that the sundial is a kind of a obiism hold. sent8: something absents if that it is not a kind of a Kuwait is not incorrect. sent9: the sundial is not a flats if the kapuka is not absent and is not a Kuwait. sent10: the stewpan is rustless. sent11: the trichloroethylene is a fare. sent12: the sundial is not a Kuwait if either something is not non-doubles or it does behold practicability or both. sent13: something that is a kind of a obiism is flats. sent14: if the fact that the trichloroethylene fares hold the fact that it is not sclerotic and it does manage is not true. sent15: the haik is a Meany if something that is not a obiism does walk. sent16: the malfeasant is a walk. sent17: the fact that the kapuka is non-heteroecious a walk does not hold if it is a obiism. sent18: the haik is unsinkable if the fact that the malfeasant is non-heteroecious thing that is unsinkable does not hold. sent19: if that something is not sclerotic and manages is not correct it does not manages. sent20: the kapuka does not behold practicability if something that is not a kind of a doubles does not misdeal. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: either the malfeasant is a walk or it is heteroecious or both.; int1 -> int2: something does walk or it is heteroecious or both.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the sundial is a obiism.; sent13 -> int4: if the sundial is a obiism then it is flats.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sundial is a flats.; sent8 -> int6: the sundial does absent if it is not a kind of a Kuwait.; sent5 -> int7: something is a doubles or it does behold practicability or both.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the sundial is not a Kuwait.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the sundial is absent.; int5 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__