the conjunction does not occur.
sent1: if that the liveliness does not occur and the marbleizing does not occur is wrong then the capping praisworthiness occurs. sent2: that not the glassing but the intertidalness occurs does not hold if the moderation occurs. sent3: the fact that the capping praisworthiness occurs is not false if the marbleizing occurs. sent4: if the nettling gerrymander happens then that the nonfinancialness but not the blast occurs is wrong. sent5: that the disobeying Cousteau happens and the nettling gerrymander occurs is caused by that the intertidalness does not occur. sent6: the non-idiopathicness is prevented by that the liveliness does not occur and the marbleizing does not occur. sent7: if the nonfinancialness does not occur the nonpregnantness does not occur and the parching covert does not occur. sent8: the idiopathicness does not occur. sent9: the nonfinancialness does not occur if that the nonfinancialness but not the blast happens is wrong. sent10: the marbleizing does not occur. sent11: the intertidalness does not occur if that not the glassing but the intertidalness occurs does not hold. sent12: if not the plunk but the tactileness occurs that the capping Lepanto does not occur is not wrong. sent13: the deserting does not occur if the capping Lepanto does not occur and/or the deserting does not occur. sent14: if the chiropractic does not occur then not the plunk but the tactileness occurs. sent15: that the non-livelyness and the marbleizing happens does not hold. sent16: the tactileness happens. sent17: the chiropractic does not occur if the nonpregnantness does not occur and the parching covert does not occur. sent18: that the conjunction occurs does not hold if the tactileness and the deserting occurs. sent19: the fact that if the fact that the idiopathicness does not occur and the capping praisworthiness does not occur does not hold then the parching amputator occurs is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the liveliness does not occur and the marbleizing does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the idiopathicness happens hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the liveliness does not occur and the marbleizing does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the capping praisworthiness happens.;
the conjunction happens.
$hypothesis$ = the conjunction does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the liveliness does not occur and the marbleizing does not occur is wrong then the capping praisworthiness occurs. sent2: that not the glassing but the intertidalness occurs does not hold if the moderation occurs. sent3: the fact that the capping praisworthiness occurs is not false if the marbleizing occurs. sent4: if the nettling gerrymander happens then that the nonfinancialness but not the blast occurs is wrong. sent5: that the disobeying Cousteau happens and the nettling gerrymander occurs is caused by that the intertidalness does not occur. sent6: the non-idiopathicness is prevented by that the liveliness does not occur and the marbleizing does not occur. sent7: if the nonfinancialness does not occur the nonpregnantness does not occur and the parching covert does not occur. sent8: the idiopathicness does not occur. sent9: the nonfinancialness does not occur if that the nonfinancialness but not the blast happens is wrong. sent10: the marbleizing does not occur. sent11: the intertidalness does not occur if that not the glassing but the intertidalness occurs does not hold. sent12: if not the plunk but the tactileness occurs that the capping Lepanto does not occur is not wrong. sent13: the deserting does not occur if the capping Lepanto does not occur and/or the deserting does not occur. sent14: if the chiropractic does not occur then not the plunk but the tactileness occurs. sent15: that the non-livelyness and the marbleizing happens does not hold. sent16: the tactileness happens. sent17: the chiropractic does not occur if the nonpregnantness does not occur and the parching covert does not occur. sent18: that the conjunction occurs does not hold if the tactileness and the deserting occurs. sent19: the fact that if the fact that the idiopathicness does not occur and the capping praisworthiness does not occur does not hold then the parching amputator occurs is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the liveliness does not occur and the marbleizing does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the idiopathicness happens hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the liveliness does not occur and the marbleizing does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the capping praisworthiness happens.; __UNKNOWN__