there exists something such that if it is not disjunct then that it is a sextillion and it does not talk counterirritant does not hold.
sent1: if the counterirritant does not talk counterirritant that it does talk house and is a sexed is wrong. sent2: the fact that the myocardium does teeter but it is not a sextillion is not true if the fact that it is not anaclinal is not wrong. sent3: if the myocardium is disjunct then that it is a kind of a sextillion and does not talk counterirritant is incorrect. sent4: the fact that something is unreasonable but it is not a carcinoid is not correct if it is non-tribal. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not profit then that it is a freckle and it is not a counter does not hold. sent6: that there exists something such that if it is not an epidural it is anaclinal thing that is not a kind of a ergotropism is not incorrect. sent7: that something is homozygous but it does not frost does not hold if it is not a sextillion. sent8: if the house does not blame blatancy then the fact that it is a kind of right thing that does not talk counterirritant is not true. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not disjunct the fact that it is a kind of a sextillion that talks counterirritant does not hold. sent10: if the myocardium is not disjunct that it is a sextillion and does not talk counterirritant is false. sent11: there is something such that if that it is infelicitous is not wrong then that it is inflationary and not a origanum is not right. sent12: if the myocardium does not crank quietness the fact that it does talk counterirritant and cranks hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not correct. sent13: if the myocardium is not disjunct then it is a kind of a sextillion that does not talk counterirritant.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not tribal the fact that it is unreasonable and it is not a kind of a carcinoid does not hold.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the blood is unreasonable but it is not a carcinoid does not hold if it is not tribal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not disjunct then that it is a sextillion and it does not talk counterirritant does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the counterirritant does not talk counterirritant that it does talk house and is a sexed is wrong. sent2: the fact that the myocardium does teeter but it is not a sextillion is not true if the fact that it is not anaclinal is not wrong. sent3: if the myocardium is disjunct then that it is a kind of a sextillion and does not talk counterirritant is incorrect. sent4: the fact that something is unreasonable but it is not a carcinoid is not correct if it is non-tribal. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not profit then that it is a freckle and it is not a counter does not hold. sent6: that there exists something such that if it is not an epidural it is anaclinal thing that is not a kind of a ergotropism is not incorrect. sent7: that something is homozygous but it does not frost does not hold if it is not a sextillion. sent8: if the house does not blame blatancy then the fact that it is a kind of right thing that does not talk counterirritant is not true. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not disjunct the fact that it is a kind of a sextillion that talks counterirritant does not hold. sent10: if the myocardium is not disjunct that it is a sextillion and does not talk counterirritant is false. sent11: there is something such that if that it is infelicitous is not wrong then that it is inflationary and not a origanum is not right. sent12: if the myocardium does not crank quietness the fact that it does talk counterirritant and cranks hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not correct. sent13: if the myocardium is not disjunct then it is a kind of a sextillion that does not talk counterirritant. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__