the dolmen is both not unpropitious and not a haploid.
sent1: if the Chinaman is not caudal then the dolmen tipples and/or it is not a starship. sent2: there exists something such that it does not housekeep affirmative and justifies circumlocution. sent3: the dolmen does not volatilize. sent4: if that something is not a trichromacy but it does volatilize is not correct it is a trichromacy. sent5: that something is not unpropitious and it is not a haploid is not correct if it discriminates. sent6: the Chinaman is a kind of a radiophotography. sent7: that something is not a haploid is not incorrect if the fact that it is a canyonside is true. sent8: the fact that the counterterrorist is not a trichromacy is right if the Chinaman is discriminate and a radiophotography. sent9: the Chinaman justifies circumlocution. sent10: something does justify circumlocution. sent11: if something either tipples or is not a starship or both it is not a canyonside. sent12: something that is a trichromacy is a radiophotography. sent13: the dolmen is a kind of a canyonside if it does not volatilize. sent14: that the dolmen does not housekeep affirmative hold. sent15: something does not housekeep affirmative. sent16: the weathercock does not housekeep affirmative. sent17: there exists something such that it housekeeps affirmative and it does justify circumlocution. sent18: the dolmen is not unpropitious if that the counterterrorist is not a trichromacy is not incorrect. sent19: there is something such that it does not justify M3 and/or it does not justify acupuncture. sent20: if something is not a canyonside the fact that it is not a kind of a trichromacy and it does volatilize is not correct. sent21: that the Chinaman does discriminate hold if the fact that something does not housekeep affirmative and does justify circumlocution is not false.
sent2 & sent21 -> int1: the Chinaman does discriminate.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the Chinaman is discriminate thing that is a radiophotography.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the counterterrorist is not a trichromacy.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the dolmen is not unpropitious.; sent7 -> int5: if the dolmen is a canyonside then it is not a haploid.; sent13 & sent3 -> int6: the dolmen is a canyonside.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the dolmen is not a haploid.; int4 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dolmen is propitious thing that is not a haploid is incorrect.
sent5 -> int8: the fact that the dolmen is not unpropitious and is not a kind of a haploid is wrong if it discriminates.; sent12 -> int9: the dolmen is a radiophotography if it is a trichromacy.; sent4 -> int10: the dolmen is a kind of a trichromacy if the fact that it is not a kind of a trichromacy and does volatilize is not right.; sent20 -> int11: the fact that the dolmen is not a trichromacy but it volatilizes is wrong if it is not a canyonside.; sent11 -> int12: the dolmen is not a kind of a canyonside if either it does tipple or it is not a kind of a starship or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the dolmen is both not unpropitious and not a haploid. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Chinaman is not caudal then the dolmen tipples and/or it is not a starship. sent2: there exists something such that it does not housekeep affirmative and justifies circumlocution. sent3: the dolmen does not volatilize. sent4: if that something is not a trichromacy but it does volatilize is not correct it is a trichromacy. sent5: that something is not unpropitious and it is not a haploid is not correct if it discriminates. sent6: the Chinaman is a kind of a radiophotography. sent7: that something is not a haploid is not incorrect if the fact that it is a canyonside is true. sent8: the fact that the counterterrorist is not a trichromacy is right if the Chinaman is discriminate and a radiophotography. sent9: the Chinaman justifies circumlocution. sent10: something does justify circumlocution. sent11: if something either tipples or is not a starship or both it is not a canyonside. sent12: something that is a trichromacy is a radiophotography. sent13: the dolmen is a kind of a canyonside if it does not volatilize. sent14: that the dolmen does not housekeep affirmative hold. sent15: something does not housekeep affirmative. sent16: the weathercock does not housekeep affirmative. sent17: there exists something such that it housekeeps affirmative and it does justify circumlocution. sent18: the dolmen is not unpropitious if that the counterterrorist is not a trichromacy is not incorrect. sent19: there is something such that it does not justify M3 and/or it does not justify acupuncture. sent20: if something is not a canyonside the fact that it is not a kind of a trichromacy and it does volatilize is not correct. sent21: that the Chinaman does discriminate hold if the fact that something does not housekeep affirmative and does justify circumlocution is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent21 -> int1: the Chinaman does discriminate.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the Chinaman is discriminate thing that is a radiophotography.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the counterterrorist is not a trichromacy.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the dolmen is not unpropitious.; sent7 -> int5: if the dolmen is a canyonside then it is not a haploid.; sent13 & sent3 -> int6: the dolmen is a canyonside.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the dolmen is not a haploid.; int4 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__