the thaw is a transmittance.
sent1: if the commemorative is not a barter then the fact that the VCR is a homeotherm and is a kind of a toga does not hold. sent2: the thaw is not a paddy if it does not outgeneral tuition. sent3: the commemorative is not a barter. sent4: the thaw outgenerals cybercrime if there is something such that that it is a homeotherm and is a toga does not hold. sent5: if something does flow it does not outgeneral tuition. sent6: that that the thaw is non-wolflike thing that is not a kind of a Antrozous is not true hold. sent7: if the thaw is not non-wolflike then it is not sociological. sent8: the fact that the thaw is a kind of wolflike thing that is not a Antrozous is incorrect. sent9: the thaw does not outgeneral tuition if it is a flow. sent10: the fact that the caracolito is not wolflike but it is sociological does not hold. sent11: the fact that if there is something such that that it is both not wolflike and sociological is not correct the VCR is a paddy is right. sent12: something does not outgeneral cybercrime and is not a barter if it flows. sent13: if the fact that the thaw is non-wolflike and it is not a Antrozous is not true then it is not sociological. sent14: if the VCR does outgeneral tuition the commemorative is a flow. sent15: something does not outgeneral tuition if the fact that it either does outgeneral cybercrime or is a flow or both is not wrong. sent16: if something is not a paddy and is not sociological then it is a kind of a transmittance.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: that that the VCR is a kind of a homeotherm that is a kind of a toga is not true hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a homeotherm and is a toga is not correct.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the thaw does outgeneral cybercrime.; int3 -> int4: the thaw does outgeneral cybercrime and/or it is a kind of a flow.; sent15 -> int5: if the thaw outgenerals cybercrime and/or it flows that it does not outgeneral tuition is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the thaw does not outgeneral tuition.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the thaw is not a kind of a paddy.; sent13 & sent6 -> int8: the thaw is not sociological.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the thaw is not a paddy and is not sociological.; sent16 -> int10: if the thaw is not a paddy and is not sociological then it is a transmittance.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the thaw is not a transmittance.
sent12 -> int11: the commemorative does not outgeneral cybercrime and it does not barter if it is a flow.; sent10 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not wolflike and it is sociological does not hold.; int12 & sent11 -> int13: the VCR is a paddy.;
$hypothesis$ = the thaw is a transmittance. ; $context$ = sent1: if the commemorative is not a barter then the fact that the VCR is a homeotherm and is a kind of a toga does not hold. sent2: the thaw is not a paddy if it does not outgeneral tuition. sent3: the commemorative is not a barter. sent4: the thaw outgenerals cybercrime if there is something such that that it is a homeotherm and is a toga does not hold. sent5: if something does flow it does not outgeneral tuition. sent6: that that the thaw is non-wolflike thing that is not a kind of a Antrozous is not true hold. sent7: if the thaw is not non-wolflike then it is not sociological. sent8: the fact that the thaw is a kind of wolflike thing that is not a Antrozous is incorrect. sent9: the thaw does not outgeneral tuition if it is a flow. sent10: the fact that the caracolito is not wolflike but it is sociological does not hold. sent11: the fact that if there is something such that that it is both not wolflike and sociological is not correct the VCR is a paddy is right. sent12: something does not outgeneral cybercrime and is not a barter if it flows. sent13: if the fact that the thaw is non-wolflike and it is not a Antrozous is not true then it is not sociological. sent14: if the VCR does outgeneral tuition the commemorative is a flow. sent15: something does not outgeneral tuition if the fact that it either does outgeneral cybercrime or is a flow or both is not wrong. sent16: if something is not a paddy and is not sociological then it is a kind of a transmittance. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: that that the VCR is a kind of a homeotherm that is a kind of a toga is not true hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a homeotherm and is a toga is not correct.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the thaw does outgeneral cybercrime.; int3 -> int4: the thaw does outgeneral cybercrime and/or it is a kind of a flow.; sent15 -> int5: if the thaw outgenerals cybercrime and/or it flows that it does not outgeneral tuition is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the thaw does not outgeneral tuition.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the thaw is not a kind of a paddy.; sent13 & sent6 -> int8: the thaw is not sociological.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the thaw is not a paddy and is not sociological.; sent16 -> int10: if the thaw is not a paddy and is not sociological then it is a transmittance.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__