if the phone-in happens then the entr'acte does not occur but the bedewing hawala happens.
sent1: that the reissuing Highlander and the non-clockwiseness occurs is false. sent2: the entr'acte does not occur if the fact that the phone-in occurs hold. sent3: not the drum but the expiratoriness occurs if the makeready does not occur. sent4: the entr'acte does not occur. sent5: if the gonadalness happens the fact that the reissuing Highlander does not occur and the clockwiseness does not occur does not hold. sent6: the reissuing ruler happens. sent7: the entr'acte does not occur but the bedewing hawala occurs if the lunging does not occur. sent8: if the horseplay occurs then not the saccade but the bedewing amyl occurs. sent9: the lunging does not occur if the phone-in occurs and the acceptableness does not occur. sent10: that the reissuing Highlander and the non-clockwiseness occurs is wrong if the gonadalness happens. sent11: the theosophicalness does not occur if the comptrollership but not the matutinalness happens. sent12: if the goal happens the gonadalness occurs. sent13: that the acceptableness occurs or the bedewing Pseudoryx occurs or both results in that the trace does not occur. sent14: that the tracing does not occur causes that the reissuing Highlander does not occur and the clockwiseness does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the lunging does not occur is right then the entr'acte does not occur. sent16: the goal happens. sent17: both the non-estimableness and the backflow occurs. sent18: that the phoneticsness occurs is prevented by that the communing but not the raree-show happens. sent19: that the encrusting hexenbesen does not occur and the harrying honoring does not occur is not correct. sent20: if the caress happens and/or the mechanisticness occurs then the battery does not occur. sent21: the reissuing Highlander does not occur if the trace does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the acceptableness does not occur is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: the acceptableness or the bedewing Pseudoryx or both occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the trace does not occur.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the reissuing Highlander does not occur and the clockwiseness does not occur.; sent12 & sent16 -> int4: the gonadalness occurs.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: that the reissuing Highlander does not occur and the clockwiseness does not occur is incorrect.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the acceptableness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the phone-in occurs.; int7 & assump2 -> int8: both the phone-in and the non-acceptableness happens.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the lunge does not occur.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the entr'acte does not occur and the bedewing hawala occurs.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the phone-in happens then the entr'acte does not occur but the bedewing hawala happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the reissuing Highlander and the non-clockwiseness occurs is false. sent2: the entr'acte does not occur if the fact that the phone-in occurs hold. sent3: not the drum but the expiratoriness occurs if the makeready does not occur. sent4: the entr'acte does not occur. sent5: if the gonadalness happens the fact that the reissuing Highlander does not occur and the clockwiseness does not occur does not hold. sent6: the reissuing ruler happens. sent7: the entr'acte does not occur but the bedewing hawala occurs if the lunging does not occur. sent8: if the horseplay occurs then not the saccade but the bedewing amyl occurs. sent9: the lunging does not occur if the phone-in occurs and the acceptableness does not occur. sent10: that the reissuing Highlander and the non-clockwiseness occurs is wrong if the gonadalness happens. sent11: the theosophicalness does not occur if the comptrollership but not the matutinalness happens. sent12: if the goal happens the gonadalness occurs. sent13: that the acceptableness occurs or the bedewing Pseudoryx occurs or both results in that the trace does not occur. sent14: that the tracing does not occur causes that the reissuing Highlander does not occur and the clockwiseness does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the lunging does not occur is right then the entr'acte does not occur. sent16: the goal happens. sent17: both the non-estimableness and the backflow occurs. sent18: that the phoneticsness occurs is prevented by that the communing but not the raree-show happens. sent19: that the encrusting hexenbesen does not occur and the harrying honoring does not occur is not correct. sent20: if the caress happens and/or the mechanisticness occurs then the battery does not occur. sent21: the reissuing Highlander does not occur if the trace does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the acceptableness does not occur is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: the acceptableness or the bedewing Pseudoryx or both occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the trace does not occur.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the reissuing Highlander does not occur and the clockwiseness does not occur.; sent12 & sent16 -> int4: the gonadalness occurs.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: that the reissuing Highlander does not occur and the clockwiseness does not occur is incorrect.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the acceptableness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the phone-in occurs.; int7 & assump2 -> int8: both the phone-in and the non-acceptableness happens.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the lunge does not occur.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the entr'acte does not occur and the bedewing hawala occurs.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__