the fact that the bayou is not a kind of an incident hold.
sent1: there is something such that either it is not calligraphic or it is not a rise or both. sent2: if something that is not bedless does not prepare candytuft it is not a kind of a ration. sent3: if that the snail is bedless hold then the bayou is not bedless and does not prepare candytuft. sent4: the fact that if something does prepare candytuft the fact that it is both bedless and not a ration is not correct is not wrong. sent5: that if the bayou is not the ration that the bayou is a kind of a timolol that is not a neoclassicist is false is correct. sent6: if there is something such that it is not calligraphic and/or it is not a kind of a rise then the snail is bedless.
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the snail is bedless.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the bayou is not bedless and it does not prepare candytuft.; sent2 -> int3: the bayou does not ration if it is bedded thing that does not prepare candytuft.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bayou does not ration.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the fact that the bayou is a timolol and is non-neoclassicist does not hold is right.;
that the bayou is a kind of an incident is not false.
sent4 -> int6: if the bayou does prepare candytuft the fact that it is bedless and it is not a ration is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bayou is not a kind of an incident hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that either it is not calligraphic or it is not a rise or both. sent2: if something that is not bedless does not prepare candytuft it is not a kind of a ration. sent3: if that the snail is bedless hold then the bayou is not bedless and does not prepare candytuft. sent4: the fact that if something does prepare candytuft the fact that it is both bedless and not a ration is not correct is not wrong. sent5: that if the bayou is not the ration that the bayou is a kind of a timolol that is not a neoclassicist is false is correct. sent6: if there is something such that it is not calligraphic and/or it is not a kind of a rise then the snail is bedless. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the snail is bedless.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the bayou is not bedless and it does not prepare candytuft.; sent2 -> int3: the bayou does not ration if it is bedded thing that does not prepare candytuft.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bayou does not ration.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the fact that the bayou is a timolol and is non-neoclassicist does not hold is right.; __UNKNOWN__