something is not three-wheel.
sent1: if something does reopen pseudophloem then that it is not three-wheel but a inhomogeneity is not true. sent2: there exists something such that it does not concern hybrid. sent3: there is something such that it is three-wheel. sent4: the fact that the thumbhole is not three-wheel hold. sent5: if the marsupial does reopen thumbhole it is three-wheel and does not reopen pseudophloem. sent6: if the fact that something is a inhomogeneity that does deaden does not hold then it does not deaden. sent7: if the fact that the marsupial is not three-wheel but it is a inhomogeneity is not correct then the alcazar is not a kind of a nail. sent8: if the pseudophloem does not reopen pseudophloem and does not reopen thumbhole the marsupial does reopen pseudophloem. sent9: there exists something such that it does not reopen Delilah.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it does not deaden.
sent6 -> int1: the alcazar does not deaden if that it is a inhomogeneity that does deaden does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not three-wheel. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does reopen pseudophloem then that it is not three-wheel but a inhomogeneity is not true. sent2: there exists something such that it does not concern hybrid. sent3: there is something such that it is three-wheel. sent4: the fact that the thumbhole is not three-wheel hold. sent5: if the marsupial does reopen thumbhole it is three-wheel and does not reopen pseudophloem. sent6: if the fact that something is a inhomogeneity that does deaden does not hold then it does not deaden. sent7: if the fact that the marsupial is not three-wheel but it is a inhomogeneity is not correct then the alcazar is not a kind of a nail. sent8: if the pseudophloem does not reopen pseudophloem and does not reopen thumbhole the marsupial does reopen pseudophloem. sent9: there exists something such that it does not reopen Delilah. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__