the elastase does not freeze-dry opopanax.
sent1: if the energizer is a annotator the elastase does freeze-dry opopanax. sent2: something does not approach arquebus and is chelicerous if it is a patient. sent3: the energizer is a kind of a compress if the calabash does housekeep broken. sent4: something does housekeep broken if that it does not redeposit and/or wangles does not hold. sent5: that something does housekeep broken and it freeze-dries opopanax is wrong if it does not approach arquebus. sent6: if the calabash does housekeep broken then the fact that the babbitt does not housekeep broken but it approaches arquebus is incorrect. sent7: the energizer is a compress if it is a patient. sent8: that the gatehouse does not approach arquebus but it is chelicerous is not right if that the babbitt does approach arquebus hold. sent9: the elastase does freeze-dry opopanax if it is not a kind of a wangle. sent10: the fact that the jackhammer does not approach periselene and/or it does approach Annwfn is incorrect. sent11: The Annwfn does not approach gatehouse. sent12: the babbitt approaches arquebus if the calabash does not redeposit or it wangles or both. sent13: if the calabash is a patient then that the gatehouse housekeeps broken hold. sent14: if the babbitt wangles the gatehouse does approach arquebus. sent15: if something approaches arquebus it is non-chelicerous thing that does approach Annwfn. sent16: if the gatehouse does not approach Annwfn the fact that it is patient is right. sent17: the elastase is a wangle. sent18: the fact that if the babbitt does not redeposit then the calabash approaches arquebus hold. sent19: if the fact that the energizer is not chelicerous is not false then the fact that the gatehouse is a compress hold. sent20: something does not freeze-dry opopanax if the fact that it housekeeps broken and does freeze-dry opopanax is false. sent21: the gatehouse does not approach Annwfn. sent22: if something is a compress it is a annotator.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calabash does not redeposit and/or it does wangle.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the babbitt does approach arquebus.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the gatehouse does not approach arquebus but it is chelicerous is not correct.; sent2 -> int3: the gatehouse does not approach arquebus but it is chelicerous if it is patient.; sent16 & sent21 -> int4: the gatehouse is patient.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the gatehouse does not approach arquebus but it is chelicerous.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the calabash does not redeposit and/or it is a wangle is not correct.; sent4 -> int8: if the fact that either the calabash does not redeposit or it does wangle or both does not hold then it housekeeps broken.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the calabash housekeeps broken.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the energizer is a compress.; sent22 -> int11: if the energizer is a compress it is a annotator.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the energizer is a annotator.; int12 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the elastase does not freeze-dry opopanax.
sent20 -> int13: if that the elastase does housekeep broken and it does freeze-dry opopanax is incorrect it does not freeze-dry opopanax.; sent5 -> int14: if the fact that the elastase does not approach arquebus is not incorrect the fact that it housekeeps broken and does freeze-dry opopanax does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the elastase does not freeze-dry opopanax. ; $context$ = sent1: if the energizer is a annotator the elastase does freeze-dry opopanax. sent2: something does not approach arquebus and is chelicerous if it is a patient. sent3: the energizer is a kind of a compress if the calabash does housekeep broken. sent4: something does housekeep broken if that it does not redeposit and/or wangles does not hold. sent5: that something does housekeep broken and it freeze-dries opopanax is wrong if it does not approach arquebus. sent6: if the calabash does housekeep broken then the fact that the babbitt does not housekeep broken but it approaches arquebus is incorrect. sent7: the energizer is a compress if it is a patient. sent8: that the gatehouse does not approach arquebus but it is chelicerous is not right if that the babbitt does approach arquebus hold. sent9: the elastase does freeze-dry opopanax if it is not a kind of a wangle. sent10: the fact that the jackhammer does not approach periselene and/or it does approach Annwfn is incorrect. sent11: The Annwfn does not approach gatehouse. sent12: the babbitt approaches arquebus if the calabash does not redeposit or it wangles or both. sent13: if the calabash is a patient then that the gatehouse housekeeps broken hold. sent14: if the babbitt wangles the gatehouse does approach arquebus. sent15: if something approaches arquebus it is non-chelicerous thing that does approach Annwfn. sent16: if the gatehouse does not approach Annwfn the fact that it is patient is right. sent17: the elastase is a wangle. sent18: the fact that if the babbitt does not redeposit then the calabash approaches arquebus hold. sent19: if the fact that the energizer is not chelicerous is not false then the fact that the gatehouse is a compress hold. sent20: something does not freeze-dry opopanax if the fact that it housekeeps broken and does freeze-dry opopanax is false. sent21: the gatehouse does not approach Annwfn. sent22: if something is a compress it is a annotator. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calabash does not redeposit and/or it does wangle.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the babbitt does approach arquebus.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the gatehouse does not approach arquebus but it is chelicerous is not correct.; sent2 -> int3: the gatehouse does not approach arquebus but it is chelicerous if it is patient.; sent16 & sent21 -> int4: the gatehouse is patient.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the gatehouse does not approach arquebus but it is chelicerous.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the calabash does not redeposit and/or it is a wangle is not correct.; sent4 -> int8: if the fact that either the calabash does not redeposit or it does wangle or both does not hold then it housekeeps broken.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the calabash housekeeps broken.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the energizer is a compress.; sent22 -> int11: if the energizer is a compress it is a annotator.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the energizer is a annotator.; int12 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__