the keeshond is stubborn and premeditates haziness.
sent1: the approver is quartzose but not a dankness. sent2: the pocketknife is a kill if the uphill is a comfort. sent3: that the keeshond is stubborn thing that does premeditate haziness is not correct if the outcrop is not clausal. sent4: the outcrop is a Schiller but it is non-going if the pocketknife is not a blinded. sent5: the fact that the bullnose is not a dankness but evil does not hold if it is clausal. sent6: the bullnose is clausal. sent7: if there exists something such that it is illogical the uphill is a comfort and/or not illogical. sent8: if something that is a Schiller is not a going it is not clausal. sent9: if the stairway is not a megaton that the argasid is unsalable and/or is a seer is not true. sent10: if something is not chaetal then it does not blind. sent11: if the fact that something is not a dankness but it is an evil is not correct then it does not premeditate haziness. sent12: the approver is a PET if an oral thing is a kind of a reticle. sent13: if the bullnose does not premeditate haziness the keeshond is stubborn and it premeditate haziness. sent14: the theist is not unsalable if that the argasid is unsalable or is a seer or both is false. sent15: if the approver is a kind of a megaton that is a PET then the stairway is not a megaton. sent16: the styrene is penal thing that is illogical if the theist is not unsalable. sent17: the keeshond premeditates haziness if the bullnose does not premeditates haziness. sent18: something is a kind of an oral and it is a reticle. sent19: a kill is neuroendocrine and is not chaetal. sent20: the approver is a kind of a megaton that does not ventilate traitress if it is a Merckx. sent21: the approver is a kind of a Merckx if it is quartzose and it is not a dankness.
sent11 -> int1: that the bullnose does not premeditate haziness is not wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of a dankness and it is an evil is false.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the bullnose is not a dankness but an evil is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bullnose does not premeditate haziness.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the keeshond is stubborn and it premeditates haziness does not hold.
sent8 -> int4: the outcrop is not clausal if it is a Schiller and it is not a going.; sent10 -> int5: the pocketknife does not blind if it is not chaetal.; sent19 -> int6: the pocketknife is both neuroendocrine and not chaetal if it is a kind of a kill.; sent21 & sent1 -> int7: the approver is a Merckx.; sent20 & int7 -> int8: the approver is a megaton but it does not ventilate traitress.; int8 -> int9: the approver is a megaton.; sent18 & sent12 -> int10: the approver is a PET.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the approver is a megaton and is a PET.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the stairway is not a megaton.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: that the argasid is unsalable and/or is a kind of a seer is wrong.; sent14 & int13 -> int14: the theist is not unsalable.; sent16 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the styrene is penal and illogical is not incorrect.; int15 -> int16: the styrene is illogical.; int16 -> int17: something is illogical.; int17 & sent7 -> int18: the uphill is a comfort and/or illogical.;
$hypothesis$ = the keeshond is stubborn and premeditates haziness. ; $context$ = sent1: the approver is quartzose but not a dankness. sent2: the pocketknife is a kill if the uphill is a comfort. sent3: that the keeshond is stubborn thing that does premeditate haziness is not correct if the outcrop is not clausal. sent4: the outcrop is a Schiller but it is non-going if the pocketknife is not a blinded. sent5: the fact that the bullnose is not a dankness but evil does not hold if it is clausal. sent6: the bullnose is clausal. sent7: if there exists something such that it is illogical the uphill is a comfort and/or not illogical. sent8: if something that is a Schiller is not a going it is not clausal. sent9: if the stairway is not a megaton that the argasid is unsalable and/or is a seer is not true. sent10: if something is not chaetal then it does not blind. sent11: if the fact that something is not a dankness but it is an evil is not correct then it does not premeditate haziness. sent12: the approver is a PET if an oral thing is a kind of a reticle. sent13: if the bullnose does not premeditate haziness the keeshond is stubborn and it premeditate haziness. sent14: the theist is not unsalable if that the argasid is unsalable or is a seer or both is false. sent15: if the approver is a kind of a megaton that is a PET then the stairway is not a megaton. sent16: the styrene is penal thing that is illogical if the theist is not unsalable. sent17: the keeshond premeditates haziness if the bullnose does not premeditates haziness. sent18: something is a kind of an oral and it is a reticle. sent19: a kill is neuroendocrine and is not chaetal. sent20: the approver is a kind of a megaton that does not ventilate traitress if it is a Merckx. sent21: the approver is a kind of a Merckx if it is quartzose and it is not a dankness. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: that the bullnose does not premeditate haziness is not wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of a dankness and it is an evil is false.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the bullnose is not a dankness but an evil is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bullnose does not premeditate haziness.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__