there is something such that it is a mechanism and/or it is a kind of a phototropism.
sent1: the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver if the climatologist either does not leap Lennon or is a Gerreidae or both. sent2: the Tungusic is a mechanism if it is not a Gerreidae. sent3: the Tungusic is a Gerreidae and/or guggles owner-driver. sent4: if that the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver and does not leap petfood does not hold the climatologist leap petfood. sent5: the climatologist is not a phototropism if either the Tungusic is not a Gerreidae or it does guggle owner-driver or both. sent6: if the Tungusic does leap Lennon then the climatologist does not guggle owner-driver. sent7: if the fact that something does guggle vein is true then that it is a kind of a mechanism is not false. sent8: the Tungusic does not leap Lennon and/or it is a mechanism. sent9: the climatologist leaps Lennon or it is a Gerreidae or both. sent10: the Tungusic is a kind of a Gerreidae. sent11: if the climatologist does not leap Lennon then the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver. sent12: something is a phototropism if it does not guggle owner-driver. sent13: if the saxhorn is three-wheel the petfood is not an efficiency but it guggles vein. sent14: the Tungusic does leap Tungusic. sent15: if the climatologist does not leap Lennon and/or it is a kind of a mechanism the Tungusic is not a kind of a Gerreidae. sent16: if that the raider is not a phototropism is not wrong then that the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver and does not leap petfood is wrong. sent17: the Tungusic is a Gerreidae or it is a kind of a mechanism or both. sent18: the climatologist does not leap Lennon and/or it is a kind of a Gerreidae. sent19: if the petfood is not an efficiency and does guggle vein then the raider guggle vein. sent20: if the raider is a mechanism then it is not a kind of a phototropism.
sent1 & sent18 -> int1: the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver.; sent12 -> int2: the Tungusic is a phototropism if it does not guggle owner-driver.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Tungusic is a kind of a phototropism.; int3 -> int4: either the Tungusic is a mechanism or it is a kind of a phototropism or both.; int4 -> hypothesis;
something does leap petfood and/or is a nephology.
sent7 -> int5: the raider is a mechanism if that it does guggle vein is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is a mechanism and/or it is a kind of a phototropism. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver if the climatologist either does not leap Lennon or is a Gerreidae or both. sent2: the Tungusic is a mechanism if it is not a Gerreidae. sent3: the Tungusic is a Gerreidae and/or guggles owner-driver. sent4: if that the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver and does not leap petfood does not hold the climatologist leap petfood. sent5: the climatologist is not a phototropism if either the Tungusic is not a Gerreidae or it does guggle owner-driver or both. sent6: if the Tungusic does leap Lennon then the climatologist does not guggle owner-driver. sent7: if the fact that something does guggle vein is true then that it is a kind of a mechanism is not false. sent8: the Tungusic does not leap Lennon and/or it is a mechanism. sent9: the climatologist leaps Lennon or it is a Gerreidae or both. sent10: the Tungusic is a kind of a Gerreidae. sent11: if the climatologist does not leap Lennon then the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver. sent12: something is a phototropism if it does not guggle owner-driver. sent13: if the saxhorn is three-wheel the petfood is not an efficiency but it guggles vein. sent14: the Tungusic does leap Tungusic. sent15: if the climatologist does not leap Lennon and/or it is a kind of a mechanism the Tungusic is not a kind of a Gerreidae. sent16: if that the raider is not a phototropism is not wrong then that the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver and does not leap petfood is wrong. sent17: the Tungusic is a Gerreidae or it is a kind of a mechanism or both. sent18: the climatologist does not leap Lennon and/or it is a kind of a Gerreidae. sent19: if the petfood is not an efficiency and does guggle vein then the raider guggle vein. sent20: if the raider is a mechanism then it is not a kind of a phototropism. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent18 -> int1: the Tungusic does not guggle owner-driver.; sent12 -> int2: the Tungusic is a phototropism if it does not guggle owner-driver.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Tungusic is a kind of a phototropism.; int3 -> int4: either the Tungusic is a mechanism or it is a kind of a phototropism or both.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__