that there is something such that if it is not acapnic then that it does sparge myrtle and does not sparge sprog does not hold is not true.
sent1: the exponent strikes but it is non-chemical if the fact that it does not sparge sprog is not wrong. sent2: something is mortuary and is not a housemate if it does not speak HMO. sent3: something is a kind of a cleared that is not monetary if it is not a roof. sent4: the fact that the lemonade is a proctoscope but it does not sparge myrtle does not hold if it does not level. sent5: if the exponent does not speak tomtate then it is consonantal and it is not a kind of a Briton. sent6: if the exponent is acapnic then the fact that it is a rodent and it is not a kind of a clunch is wrong. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a novillero but it is not lobular does not hold if it does not sparge tritium. sent8: if something is not a cat's-tail the fact that it does update feldspar and it does not sparge lemonade is not right. sent9: that something sparges myrtle but it does not sparge sprog does not hold if it is not acapnic.
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the exponent is acapnic is false then the fact that it sparges myrtle and it does not sparge sprog is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not acapnic then that it does sparge myrtle and does not sparge sprog does not hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the exponent strikes but it is non-chemical if the fact that it does not sparge sprog is not wrong. sent2: something is mortuary and is not a housemate if it does not speak HMO. sent3: something is a kind of a cleared that is not monetary if it is not a roof. sent4: the fact that the lemonade is a proctoscope but it does not sparge myrtle does not hold if it does not level. sent5: if the exponent does not speak tomtate then it is consonantal and it is not a kind of a Briton. sent6: if the exponent is acapnic then the fact that it is a rodent and it is not a kind of a clunch is wrong. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a novillero but it is not lobular does not hold if it does not sparge tritium. sent8: if something is not a cat's-tail the fact that it does update feldspar and it does not sparge lemonade is not right. sent9: that something sparges myrtle but it does not sparge sprog does not hold if it is not acapnic. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the exponent is acapnic is false then the fact that it sparges myrtle and it does not sparge sprog is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__