that the vocabulary is non-agricultural thing that is proprioceptive does not hold.
sent1: something is not intramural if the fact that it does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall is not right. sent2: that the kidnapper is not a frostiness and it does not render neostigmine is not right. sent3: if something does not rendezvous insubordination then it is non-proprioceptive thing that does not pleach HMO. sent4: the vocabulary is non-agricultural thing that is proprioceptive if the nominator is proprioceptive. sent5: the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau. sent6: the nominator is proprioceptive if the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall. sent7: if the kidnapper is not intramural then it is not a kind of a frostiness and it does not render neostigmine.
sent1 -> int1: if that the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall is wrong the fact that it is not intramural is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the kidnapper is not intramural.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the kidnapper is not a frostiness and it does not render neostigmine.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the nominator is proprioceptive.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the monitor is not proprioceptive and it does not pleach HMO if that it does not rendezvous insubordination is correct.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the vocabulary is non-agricultural thing that is proprioceptive does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not intramural if the fact that it does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall is not right. sent2: that the kidnapper is not a frostiness and it does not render neostigmine is not right. sent3: if something does not rendezvous insubordination then it is non-proprioceptive thing that does not pleach HMO. sent4: the vocabulary is non-agricultural thing that is proprioceptive if the nominator is proprioceptive. sent5: the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau. sent6: the nominator is proprioceptive if the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall. sent7: if the kidnapper is not intramural then it is not a kind of a frostiness and it does not render neostigmine. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if that the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall is wrong the fact that it is not intramural is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the kidnapper is not intramural.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the kidnapper is not a frostiness and it does not render neostigmine.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the kidnapper does not render Gaboriau and it is not a pall.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the nominator is proprioceptive.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__