the freestone does compensate saying.
sent1: that the investor does not forecast pul and is not a kind of a Beckett is not correct if the hawkbit is symphonic. sent2: the registrant is not a tocopherol if the fact that the investor does not forecast pul and is not a Beckett is not correct. sent3: if the registrant is not a tocopherol the Tungusic is not a tocopherol and/or it is a kind of a set. sent4: the fact that the investor does not forecast pul but it is a Beckett is wrong. sent5: if the freestone does not forecast sleekness but it is temperate the hawkbit is symphonic. sent6: if the Tungusic is not a kind of a Angolan then that it is not a tocopherol and/or it is a set is wrong. sent7: the freestone does not compensate saying if the fact that it does not forecast sleekness and is temperate is wrong. sent8: the Tungusic is not a Angolan. sent9: if the hawkbit is symphonic then the fact that the investor forecasts pul but it is not a kind of a Beckett does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freestone does not forecast sleekness and is temperate.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the hawkbit is symphonic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the investor does not forecast pul and is not a Beckett does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the registrant is not a tocopherol.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the Tungusic is not a tocopherol and/or it is a set.; sent6 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the Tungusic is not a tocopherol and/or does set does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the freestone does not forecast sleekness but it is temperate is incorrect.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the freestone does compensate saying. ; $context$ = sent1: that the investor does not forecast pul and is not a kind of a Beckett is not correct if the hawkbit is symphonic. sent2: the registrant is not a tocopherol if the fact that the investor does not forecast pul and is not a Beckett is not correct. sent3: if the registrant is not a tocopherol the Tungusic is not a tocopherol and/or it is a kind of a set. sent4: the fact that the investor does not forecast pul but it is a Beckett is wrong. sent5: if the freestone does not forecast sleekness but it is temperate the hawkbit is symphonic. sent6: if the Tungusic is not a kind of a Angolan then that it is not a tocopherol and/or it is a set is wrong. sent7: the freestone does not compensate saying if the fact that it does not forecast sleekness and is temperate is wrong. sent8: the Tungusic is not a Angolan. sent9: if the hawkbit is symphonic then the fact that the investor forecasts pul but it is not a kind of a Beckett does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freestone does not forecast sleekness and is temperate.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the hawkbit is symphonic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the investor does not forecast pul and is not a Beckett does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the registrant is not a tocopherol.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the Tungusic is not a tocopherol and/or it is a set.; sent6 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the Tungusic is not a tocopherol and/or does set does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the freestone does not forecast sleekness but it is temperate is incorrect.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__