there exists something such that the fact that it misdirects or it does heft cypress or both is not incorrect.
sent1: the benedictine is not calendric. sent2: that the feijoa does not homologize is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it is an accelerator or it does homologize or both. sent4: the section is calendric if the fact that it is not penicillin-resistant and it does homologize is not true. sent5: if there is something such that it is an accelerator then the melena misdirects. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is nonhuman or it is a kind of a lorry or both is not false. sent7: the fact that the melena does misdirect and it is calendric is not right. sent8: the melena is not allogamous. sent9: the fact that the melena misdirects is not incorrect if something is an accelerator and/or it does excel culdoscope. sent10: if the benedictine does not excel culdoscope then the section is non-calendric thing that is not a slapstick. sent11: if something excels culdoscope the benedictine homologizes. sent12: the section is not a kind of a slapstick. sent13: something homologizes and/or it is a kind of an accelerator. sent14: if that the section does not misdirect and is an accelerator does not hold then the benedictine is not a kind of an accelerator. sent15: if the fact that the section does not homologize is correct it is calendric. sent16: the section does not heft cypress if it homologizes and it is penicillin-resistant. sent17: the section either recurs or is macroeconomics or both. sent18: if something does not heft cypress that it does not misdirect and is a kind of an accelerator is not right. sent19: that the section is both not a slapstick and not an accelerator is right. sent20: either the benedictine does heft cypress or it is biographic or both. sent21: if the section does excel culdoscope then the benedictine is archosaurian. sent22: the melena homologizes if something is an accelerator or does misdirect or both. sent23: the section is not a slapstick if the benedictine does not excel culdoscope.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the benedictine does not excel culdoscope.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the section is non-calendric thing that is not a kind of a slapstick.; int1 -> int2: the section is not calendric.;
the deoxyguanosine is low-rise.
sent18 -> int3: the fact that the section does not misdirect and is an accelerator is not true if it does not heft cypress.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it misdirects or it does heft cypress or both is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the benedictine is not calendric. sent2: that the feijoa does not homologize is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it is an accelerator or it does homologize or both. sent4: the section is calendric if the fact that it is not penicillin-resistant and it does homologize is not true. sent5: if there is something such that it is an accelerator then the melena misdirects. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is nonhuman or it is a kind of a lorry or both is not false. sent7: the fact that the melena does misdirect and it is calendric is not right. sent8: the melena is not allogamous. sent9: the fact that the melena misdirects is not incorrect if something is an accelerator and/or it does excel culdoscope. sent10: if the benedictine does not excel culdoscope then the section is non-calendric thing that is not a slapstick. sent11: if something excels culdoscope the benedictine homologizes. sent12: the section is not a kind of a slapstick. sent13: something homologizes and/or it is a kind of an accelerator. sent14: if that the section does not misdirect and is an accelerator does not hold then the benedictine is not a kind of an accelerator. sent15: if the fact that the section does not homologize is correct it is calendric. sent16: the section does not heft cypress if it homologizes and it is penicillin-resistant. sent17: the section either recurs or is macroeconomics or both. sent18: if something does not heft cypress that it does not misdirect and is a kind of an accelerator is not right. sent19: that the section is both not a slapstick and not an accelerator is right. sent20: either the benedictine does heft cypress or it is biographic or both. sent21: if the section does excel culdoscope then the benedictine is archosaurian. sent22: the melena homologizes if something is an accelerator or does misdirect or both. sent23: the section is not a slapstick if the benedictine does not excel culdoscope. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the benedictine does not excel culdoscope.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the section is non-calendric thing that is not a kind of a slapstick.; int1 -> int2: the section is not calendric.; __UNKNOWN__