that the orangery is a monocarp and a gun is not correct.
sent1: if the minister is a kind of a monocarp the bourtree is not a monocarp. sent2: something is a monocarp and a gun if the fact that that it is not a eremite is false is not true. sent3: if the alpenstock does not steel Republican that the cafe is non-Singaporean thing that tarries is incorrect. sent4: that the northeast is gluteal and does not steel Republican is not right. sent5: the fact that the cafe does not tarry is correct if that it is not a Singaporean and tarry is incorrect. sent6: the zombie is not ferric and not an individual if the cafe is a stinker. sent7: the minister is not a eremite and it is not a kind of a lunula if the bookseller is not ferric. sent8: the orangery is not a lunula. sent9: the fact that something is not a olive-green but it is a stinker is not wrong if that it does not tarry hold. sent10: the fact that either the bookseller is a kind of a eremite or it is not a kind of a lunula or both is not right if there exists something such that it is not ferric. sent11: if the orangery is not a lunula then it is not a kind of a eremite. sent12: the alpenstock does not steel Republican if the fact that the northeast is a kind of gluteal thing that does not steel Republican does not hold.
sent2 -> int1: if the orangery is not a eremite it is a kind of a monocarp and it guns.; sent11 & sent8 -> int2: the orangery is not a eremite.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the orangery is a monocarp and a gun does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the orangery is a monocarp and a gun is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the minister is a kind of a monocarp the bourtree is not a monocarp. sent2: something is a monocarp and a gun if the fact that that it is not a eremite is false is not true. sent3: if the alpenstock does not steel Republican that the cafe is non-Singaporean thing that tarries is incorrect. sent4: that the northeast is gluteal and does not steel Republican is not right. sent5: the fact that the cafe does not tarry is correct if that it is not a Singaporean and tarry is incorrect. sent6: the zombie is not ferric and not an individual if the cafe is a stinker. sent7: the minister is not a eremite and it is not a kind of a lunula if the bookseller is not ferric. sent8: the orangery is not a lunula. sent9: the fact that something is not a olive-green but it is a stinker is not wrong if that it does not tarry hold. sent10: the fact that either the bookseller is a kind of a eremite or it is not a kind of a lunula or both is not right if there exists something such that it is not ferric. sent11: if the orangery is not a lunula then it is not a kind of a eremite. sent12: the alpenstock does not steel Republican if the fact that the northeast is a kind of gluteal thing that does not steel Republican does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the orangery is not a eremite it is a kind of a monocarp and it guns.; sent11 & sent8 -> int2: the orangery is not a eremite.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__