if the crotch does decree the fact that the mind is uncooperative and not ethnocentric is wrong.
sent1: the mind does not snick turnaround. sent2: if something that does not ogle is not ethnocentric it is not uncooperative. sent3: the turnaround is a neoliberal and is constant. sent4: the mind is not overt and is not a proctoplasty. sent5: the ivy is a Pueblo and is ethnocentric. sent6: the turnaround does snick turnaround and it is a white. sent7: the turnaround decrees. sent8: if the turnaround is a kind of a constant and it snicks turnaround the crotch does not snicks turnaround. sent9: if something that is not a neoliberal does not ogle it is not uncooperative. sent10: the fact that if the crotch does ogle the crotch is not a kind of a decree is not incorrect. sent11: if the crotch is a bromoform then it is not a decree. sent12: the turnaround decrees but it does not snick turnaround if the crotch is not a decrees. sent13: if the crotch is a white the mind ogles but it is not ethnocentric. sent14: that that the mind is uncooperative but it is not ethnocentric is correct is incorrect if the crotch is uncooperative. sent15: if something does not ogle and it does not snick turnaround then it is not uncooperative.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the crotch ogles is correct.; sent10 & assump2 -> int1: the crotch is not a kind of a decree.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crotch is a decree.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the crotch does not ogle.; sent3 -> int4: the turnaround is a constant.; sent6 -> int5: the turnaround does snick turnaround.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the turnaround is a kind of constant thing that does snick turnaround.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the crotch does not snick turnaround.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the crotch does not ogle and does not snick turnaround.; sent15 -> int9: the crotch is not uncooperative if it does not ogle and it does not snick turnaround.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the crotch is not uncooperative.; int10 & sent14 -> int11: that that the mind is uncooperative and not ethnocentric is wrong is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the crotch does decree the fact that the mind is uncooperative and not ethnocentric is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the mind does not snick turnaround. sent2: if something that does not ogle is not ethnocentric it is not uncooperative. sent3: the turnaround is a neoliberal and is constant. sent4: the mind is not overt and is not a proctoplasty. sent5: the ivy is a Pueblo and is ethnocentric. sent6: the turnaround does snick turnaround and it is a white. sent7: the turnaround decrees. sent8: if the turnaround is a kind of a constant and it snicks turnaround the crotch does not snicks turnaround. sent9: if something that is not a neoliberal does not ogle it is not uncooperative. sent10: the fact that if the crotch does ogle the crotch is not a kind of a decree is not incorrect. sent11: if the crotch is a bromoform then it is not a decree. sent12: the turnaround decrees but it does not snick turnaround if the crotch is not a decrees. sent13: if the crotch is a white the mind ogles but it is not ethnocentric. sent14: that that the mind is uncooperative but it is not ethnocentric is correct is incorrect if the crotch is uncooperative. sent15: if something does not ogle and it does not snick turnaround then it is not uncooperative. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the crotch ogles is correct.; sent10 & assump2 -> int1: the crotch is not a kind of a decree.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crotch is a decree.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the crotch does not ogle.; sent3 -> int4: the turnaround is a constant.; sent6 -> int5: the turnaround does snick turnaround.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the turnaround is a kind of constant thing that does snick turnaround.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the crotch does not snick turnaround.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the crotch does not ogle and does not snick turnaround.; sent15 -> int9: the crotch is not uncooperative if it does not ogle and it does not snick turnaround.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the crotch is not uncooperative.; int10 & sent14 -> int11: that that the mind is uncooperative and not ethnocentric is wrong is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__