the fact that the subjugator is a scrunch is right.
sent1: that the piste is a kind of a DA that does not caucus amplitude is wrong. sent2: if the abrasion is unreverberant then the subjugator is a scrunch. sent3: if that that the piste is a DA but it does not caucus amplitude is incorrect is true then it is a Kumasi. sent4: if the roadrunner is a frisk the abrasion is not reverberant. sent5: if the piste is unreverberant then the abrasion caucuses amplitude. sent6: if the piste is not a frisk and it is not vigesimal then the subjugator is not a frisk. sent7: if the fact that the planarian is a Kumasi but it is not vigesimal is false the roadrunner does frisk. sent8: if either something is not a frisk or it is a kind of a Kumasi or both it is not a scrunch. sent9: if the planarian is not unreverberant then the piste is both not a frisk and not vigesimal. sent10: if the piste is a Kumasi then that the planarian is a kind of a Kumasi but it is not vigesimal is wrong. sent11: that the roadrunner is a plunge but it is inexplicable is false.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the piste is a Kumasi.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the planarian is a Kumasi but not vigesimal is not right.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the roadrunner frisks.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the abrasion is unreverberant.; sent2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the subjugator is not a scrunch.
sent8 -> int5: the subjugator is not a kind of a scrunch if it does not frisk and/or it is a Kumasi.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the subjugator is a scrunch is right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the piste is a kind of a DA that does not caucus amplitude is wrong. sent2: if the abrasion is unreverberant then the subjugator is a scrunch. sent3: if that that the piste is a DA but it does not caucus amplitude is incorrect is true then it is a Kumasi. sent4: if the roadrunner is a frisk the abrasion is not reverberant. sent5: if the piste is unreverberant then the abrasion caucuses amplitude. sent6: if the piste is not a frisk and it is not vigesimal then the subjugator is not a frisk. sent7: if the fact that the planarian is a Kumasi but it is not vigesimal is false the roadrunner does frisk. sent8: if either something is not a frisk or it is a kind of a Kumasi or both it is not a scrunch. sent9: if the planarian is not unreverberant then the piste is both not a frisk and not vigesimal. sent10: if the piste is a Kumasi then that the planarian is a kind of a Kumasi but it is not vigesimal is wrong. sent11: that the roadrunner is a plunge but it is inexplicable is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the piste is a Kumasi.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the planarian is a Kumasi but not vigesimal is not right.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the roadrunner frisks.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the abrasion is unreverberant.; sent2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__