the stuffer is a liturgist.
sent1: the fact that the osmund is not an objective and does investigate Cuzco does not hold. sent2: the stuffer is not a liturgist if that the fact that the singleton is not phrenic and compacts mismanagement is not true is correct. sent3: something is a liturgist and is not non-vegetative if it is not Laputan. sent4: the singleton is not phrenic if that the osmund is a kind of non-Laputan thing that is a kind of an objective is false. sent5: the charmer is Laputan if the neodymium is vegetative. sent6: that the osmund is an objective and it investigates Cuzco does not hold. sent7: the charmer is not Laputan if that the osmund is not a kind of an objective and does investigate Cuzco is not right. sent8: that the singleton is not phrenic and compacts mismanagement is false if there are non-vegetative things. sent9: if there is something such that it is not vegetative that the singleton is phrenic and it compacts mismanagement is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the neodymium is vegetative is right.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the charmer is Laputan.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the charmer is non-Laputan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the neodymium is not vegetative.; int4 -> int5: something is not vegetative.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the singleton is non-phrenic thing that compacts mismanagement is not right.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the stuffer is a liturgist is right.
sent3 -> int7: if the stuffer is not Laputan it is both a liturgist and vegetative.;
$hypothesis$ = the stuffer is a liturgist. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the osmund is not an objective and does investigate Cuzco does not hold. sent2: the stuffer is not a liturgist if that the fact that the singleton is not phrenic and compacts mismanagement is not true is correct. sent3: something is a liturgist and is not non-vegetative if it is not Laputan. sent4: the singleton is not phrenic if that the osmund is a kind of non-Laputan thing that is a kind of an objective is false. sent5: the charmer is Laputan if the neodymium is vegetative. sent6: that the osmund is an objective and it investigates Cuzco does not hold. sent7: the charmer is not Laputan if that the osmund is not a kind of an objective and does investigate Cuzco is not right. sent8: that the singleton is not phrenic and compacts mismanagement is false if there are non-vegetative things. sent9: if there is something such that it is not vegetative that the singleton is phrenic and it compacts mismanagement is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the neodymium is vegetative is right.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the charmer is Laputan.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the charmer is non-Laputan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the neodymium is not vegetative.; int4 -> int5: something is not vegetative.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the singleton is non-phrenic thing that compacts mismanagement is not right.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__