the homileticness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the temperateness does not occur but the unquestionableness occurs is incorrect if the snowballing dagger does not occur. sent2: if that the acyclicness happens and the skiing occurs does not hold the unquestionableness does not occur. sent3: if the dilatation does not occur the cladness does not occur. sent4: if that both the effecting and the suborbitalness occurs does not hold then that the consternating falsehood does not occur is right. sent5: the fact that the acyclicness and the ski occurs does not hold. sent6: the snowballing dagger occurs. sent7: the fact that the quietness or the initiating or both happens is wrong if the moorage does not occur. sent8: if the temperateness does not occur that both the unquestionableness and the homileticness happens does not hold. sent9: the fact that the immigration does not occur and the Glaswegian does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the moorage but not the quietness occurs is not correct then the snowballing dagger does not occur. sent11: the initiating does not occur. sent12: that the unquestionableness does not occur is caused by that the skiing does not occur. sent13: the radial does not occur if the fact that the lymphocyticness and the eponymousness occurs is false. sent14: that the decamping happens and the snowballing doorknob happens is false. sent15: if the snowballing dagger does not occur the fact that the initiating does not occur and the temperateness happens is incorrect. sent16: if the gladness occurs the fact that the moorage happens but the quietness does not occur is not correct. sent17: the snips occurs. sent18: that the genotypicalness happens and the magnifying happens does not hold. sent19: if the snowballing dagger happens then the temperateness occurs. sent20: the fact that the temperateness does not occur is true if the fact that the initiate does not occur and the temperateness happens is not right. sent21: if the temperateness happens then the fact that the non-unquestionableness and the non-homileticness occurs is wrong.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the unquestionableness does not occur is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the homileticness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the non-unquestionableness and the non-homileticness happens.; sent19 & sent6 -> int3: the temperateness happens.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: that the non-unquestionableness and the non-homileticness occurs does not hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the homileticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the homileticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the temperateness does not occur but the unquestionableness occurs is incorrect if the snowballing dagger does not occur. sent2: if that the acyclicness happens and the skiing occurs does not hold the unquestionableness does not occur. sent3: if the dilatation does not occur the cladness does not occur. sent4: if that both the effecting and the suborbitalness occurs does not hold then that the consternating falsehood does not occur is right. sent5: the fact that the acyclicness and the ski occurs does not hold. sent6: the snowballing dagger occurs. sent7: the fact that the quietness or the initiating or both happens is wrong if the moorage does not occur. sent8: if the temperateness does not occur that both the unquestionableness and the homileticness happens does not hold. sent9: the fact that the immigration does not occur and the Glaswegian does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the moorage but not the quietness occurs is not correct then the snowballing dagger does not occur. sent11: the initiating does not occur. sent12: that the unquestionableness does not occur is caused by that the skiing does not occur. sent13: the radial does not occur if the fact that the lymphocyticness and the eponymousness occurs is false. sent14: that the decamping happens and the snowballing doorknob happens is false. sent15: if the snowballing dagger does not occur the fact that the initiating does not occur and the temperateness happens is incorrect. sent16: if the gladness occurs the fact that the moorage happens but the quietness does not occur is not correct. sent17: the snips occurs. sent18: that the genotypicalness happens and the magnifying happens does not hold. sent19: if the snowballing dagger happens then the temperateness occurs. sent20: the fact that the temperateness does not occur is true if the fact that the initiate does not occur and the temperateness happens is not right. sent21: if the temperateness happens then the fact that the non-unquestionableness and the non-homileticness occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the unquestionableness does not occur is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the homileticness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the non-unquestionableness and the non-homileticness happens.; sent19 & sent6 -> int3: the temperateness happens.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: that the non-unquestionableness and the non-homileticness occurs does not hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__