the amorpha does not stretch colonoscope and is not a Copehan.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it does stretch colonoscope and/or is a bookcase is wrong. sent2: the amorpha is not open-source. sent3: the amorpha is pugilistic but it is not a bookcase. sent4: something is not open-source. sent5: the amorpha is not a bookcase. sent6: the Adelie does not stoke shag if that that the lorchel does not stoke shag but it is emmetropic is not false is false. sent7: the perversion is not abasic. sent8: if something does stoke gyrfalcon the fact that it is philosophical and it is not a kind of a habitat does not hold. sent9: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is occupational thing that does not sermonize specifier hold does not hold the fact that the uakari does stoke gyrfalcon is not wrong. sent10: if the amorpha is pugilistic but it is not a bookcase then that it is not a Copehan is not false. sent11: the fact that the fact that the Adelie is occupational but it does not sermonize specifier does not hold if the Adelie is a Myocastor is correct. sent12: something is abasic and/or it is open-source. sent13: the fact that the lorchel does not stoke shag and is emmetropic is not true. sent14: if the amorpha is a kind of pugilistic a bookcase then it is not a Copehan. sent15: if that something is philosophical but it is not a habitat is wrong it is capitalistic. sent16: if the amorpha is both Slovakian and not a Copehan it is not a kind of a support. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Copehan and/or a bookcase does not hold. sent18: there is something such that that it is abasic and/or is open-source does not hold. sent19: the gyrfalcon is not open-source. sent20: there is something such that it is not abasic. sent21: the Adelie is a kind of a Myocastor that is optimistic if it does not stoke shag. sent22: if there exists something such that that that it is abasic and/or open-source is true does not hold then the amorpha does not stretch colonoscope. sent23: if that the uakari is not capitalistic does not hold the mortgagor does not stretch precession and is not pugilistic.
sent18 & sent22 -> int1: the amorpha does not stretch colonoscope.; sent10 & sent3 -> int2: the amorpha is not a Copehan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the amorpha does not stretch colonoscope and is not a kind of a Copehan does not hold.
sent15 -> int3: if that the uakari is philosophical but it is not a habitat is not correct it is capitalistic.; sent8 -> int4: the fact that the uakari is philosophical but it is not a habitat is not correct if it stokes gyrfalcon.; sent6 & sent13 -> int5: the Adelie does not stoke shag.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the Adelie is a kind of a Myocastor and it is not non-optimistic.; int6 -> int7: the Adelie is a Myocastor.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: that the Adelie is occupational and does not sermonize specifier is not true.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is occupational and it does not sermonize specifier is false.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the uakari does stoke gyrfalcon.; int4 & int10 -> int11: that the uakari is philosophical and is not a habitat does not hold.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the uakari is capitalistic.; sent23 & int12 -> int13: the mortgagor does not stretch precession and is not pugilistic.; int13 -> int14: something does not stretch precession and it is not pugilistic.;
$hypothesis$ = the amorpha does not stretch colonoscope and is not a Copehan. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it does stretch colonoscope and/or is a bookcase is wrong. sent2: the amorpha is not open-source. sent3: the amorpha is pugilistic but it is not a bookcase. sent4: something is not open-source. sent5: the amorpha is not a bookcase. sent6: the Adelie does not stoke shag if that that the lorchel does not stoke shag but it is emmetropic is not false is false. sent7: the perversion is not abasic. sent8: if something does stoke gyrfalcon the fact that it is philosophical and it is not a kind of a habitat does not hold. sent9: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is occupational thing that does not sermonize specifier hold does not hold the fact that the uakari does stoke gyrfalcon is not wrong. sent10: if the amorpha is pugilistic but it is not a bookcase then that it is not a Copehan is not false. sent11: the fact that the fact that the Adelie is occupational but it does not sermonize specifier does not hold if the Adelie is a Myocastor is correct. sent12: something is abasic and/or it is open-source. sent13: the fact that the lorchel does not stoke shag and is emmetropic is not true. sent14: if the amorpha is a kind of pugilistic a bookcase then it is not a Copehan. sent15: if that something is philosophical but it is not a habitat is wrong it is capitalistic. sent16: if the amorpha is both Slovakian and not a Copehan it is not a kind of a support. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Copehan and/or a bookcase does not hold. sent18: there is something such that that it is abasic and/or is open-source does not hold. sent19: the gyrfalcon is not open-source. sent20: there is something such that it is not abasic. sent21: the Adelie is a kind of a Myocastor that is optimistic if it does not stoke shag. sent22: if there exists something such that that that it is abasic and/or open-source is true does not hold then the amorpha does not stretch colonoscope. sent23: if that the uakari is not capitalistic does not hold the mortgagor does not stretch precession and is not pugilistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent22 -> int1: the amorpha does not stretch colonoscope.; sent10 & sent3 -> int2: the amorpha is not a Copehan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__