the vivification does not occur.
sent1: the sniffing wassailer does not occur and the satyricness does not occur if the Hinduness does not occur. sent2: the sniffing wassailer does not occur if the fact that that the emptying steelyard does not occur and the satyricness does not occur is wrong hold. sent3: if that the Gaboneseness but not the concurrence happens is not true then the Gaboneseness does not occur. sent4: if the Gaboneseness does not occur that the emptying steelyard does not occur and the satyricness does not occur is wrong. sent5: the eutherianness occurs. sent6: that the Gaboneseness but not the concurrence happens is not correct if the sniffing fondler does not occur. sent7: if the eutherianness happens and the pyloricness happens then the maundering does not occur. sent8: the sniffing fondler does not occur if that both the sniffing fondler and the pasta happens is not right. sent9: that the Hinduness does not occur is triggered by that either the non-pyloricness or the non-Ebioniteness or both occurs. sent10: if the eutherianness does not occur then the fact that the fact that the pyloricness and the vivification happens hold is not right. sent11: the fact that the satyricness does not occur hold if the Hinduness does not occur. sent12: the vivification happens if the sniffing wassailer does not occur and the satyricness does not occur. sent13: the maundering occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pyloricness occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: both the eutherianness and the pyloricness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the maundering does not occur.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the pyloricness occurs is wrong.; int4 -> int5: either the pyloricness does not occur or the Ebioniteness does not occur or both.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the Hinduness does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the sniffing wassailer does not occur and the satyricness does not occur.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the vivification does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = the vivification does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the sniffing wassailer does not occur and the satyricness does not occur if the Hinduness does not occur. sent2: the sniffing wassailer does not occur if the fact that that the emptying steelyard does not occur and the satyricness does not occur is wrong hold. sent3: if that the Gaboneseness but not the concurrence happens is not true then the Gaboneseness does not occur. sent4: if the Gaboneseness does not occur that the emptying steelyard does not occur and the satyricness does not occur is wrong. sent5: the eutherianness occurs. sent6: that the Gaboneseness but not the concurrence happens is not correct if the sniffing fondler does not occur. sent7: if the eutherianness happens and the pyloricness happens then the maundering does not occur. sent8: the sniffing fondler does not occur if that both the sniffing fondler and the pasta happens is not right. sent9: that the Hinduness does not occur is triggered by that either the non-pyloricness or the non-Ebioniteness or both occurs. sent10: if the eutherianness does not occur then the fact that the fact that the pyloricness and the vivification happens hold is not right. sent11: the fact that the satyricness does not occur hold if the Hinduness does not occur. sent12: the vivification happens if the sniffing wassailer does not occur and the satyricness does not occur. sent13: the maundering occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pyloricness occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: both the eutherianness and the pyloricness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the maundering does not occur.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the pyloricness occurs is wrong.; int4 -> int5: either the pyloricness does not occur or the Ebioniteness does not occur or both.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the Hinduness does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the sniffing wassailer does not occur and the satyricness does not occur.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__