that the sunfish is a Xiphiidae that does not adjoin jealousy does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the predictor is a kind of a sign but it is not sociolinguistic is not right. sent2: if the urokinase contends then the sunfish is a Xiphiidae and does not adjoin jealousy. sent3: that the predictor is a kind of a sign that is sociolinguistic is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that that it does sign and it does not contend is not right then the urokinase does adjoin jealousy. sent5: if the predictor is sociolinguistic then the fact that the sunfish is a Xiphiidae but it is not a kind of a sign is correct. sent6: if something does contend that it is a Xiphiidae that does not adjoin jealousy is not true. sent7: if the urokinase does emulsify predictor that either it is not a kind of a conformist or it excises or both is false. sent8: the urokinase does contend if there is something such that the fact that it is both a sign and not sociolinguistic is false.
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a sign and is not sociolinguistic is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the urokinase does contend.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that that the sunfish is a Xiphiidae but it does not adjoin jealousy is not true is correct.
sent6 -> int3: the fact that the sunfish is a kind of a Xiphiidae but it does not adjoin jealousy does not hold if it contends.;
$hypothesis$ = that the sunfish is a Xiphiidae that does not adjoin jealousy does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the predictor is a kind of a sign but it is not sociolinguistic is not right. sent2: if the urokinase contends then the sunfish is a Xiphiidae and does not adjoin jealousy. sent3: that the predictor is a kind of a sign that is sociolinguistic is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that that it does sign and it does not contend is not right then the urokinase does adjoin jealousy. sent5: if the predictor is sociolinguistic then the fact that the sunfish is a Xiphiidae but it is not a kind of a sign is correct. sent6: if something does contend that it is a Xiphiidae that does not adjoin jealousy is not true. sent7: if the urokinase does emulsify predictor that either it is not a kind of a conformist or it excises or both is false. sent8: the urokinase does contend if there is something such that the fact that it is both a sign and not sociolinguistic is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a sign and is not sociolinguistic is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the urokinase does contend.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__