the fact that something is cambial and it is crystalline is incorrect.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is not antipollution then the homunculus is cambial. sent2: there is something such that it is a kind of aneuploid thing that is a kind of a asexuality. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is a catalog and does galumph is not correct then the homunculus is crystalline. sent4: that the chapel is both antipollution and univalent is false if the peludo does not gin Ouse. sent5: the peludo is non-agronomic thing that is a Gaelic if it is bimodal. sent6: the typhoon is not a catalog but it is agronomic if it is a Gaelic. sent7: the peludo does not gin Ouse if it is a kind of non-agronomic thing that is crystalline. sent8: something is both not non-antipollution and univalent. sent9: the peludo is not agronomic if it is bimodal. sent10: the homunculus is not non-cambial if there is something such that that it is antipollution and is univalent is not correct. sent11: the typhoon is albuminuric and it is a Shoshone. sent12: there exists something such that it is rustless thing that gins expletive. sent13: the typhoon is not bimodal but it does galumph. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is bimodal a catalog does not hold. sent15: the peludo is bimodal. sent16: the chapel is not a submarine. sent17: that the typhoon is a catalog and it does galumph is false. sent18: the peludo is not agronomic. sent19: if the chapel does not galumph then the fact that that the typhoon is both antipollution and agronomic is not correct hold. sent20: if something is not agronomic but a Gaelic it does not gin Ouse. sent21: the homunculus is not bimodal.
sent5 & sent15 -> int1: the peludo is not agronomic but it is a Gaelic.; sent20 -> int2: if the peludo is a kind of non-agronomic thing that is a Gaelic then it does not gin Ouse.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the peludo does not gin Ouse.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the chapel is antipollution and it is univalent is not true.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is antipollution and it is univalent is not right.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the homunculus is cambial.; sent17 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a catalog and it galumphs is incorrect.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the homunculus is crystalline.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the homunculus is cambial and it is crystalline.; int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is cambial and it is crystalline is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is not antipollution then the homunculus is cambial. sent2: there is something such that it is a kind of aneuploid thing that is a kind of a asexuality. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is a catalog and does galumph is not correct then the homunculus is crystalline. sent4: that the chapel is both antipollution and univalent is false if the peludo does not gin Ouse. sent5: the peludo is non-agronomic thing that is a Gaelic if it is bimodal. sent6: the typhoon is not a catalog but it is agronomic if it is a Gaelic. sent7: the peludo does not gin Ouse if it is a kind of non-agronomic thing that is crystalline. sent8: something is both not non-antipollution and univalent. sent9: the peludo is not agronomic if it is bimodal. sent10: the homunculus is not non-cambial if there is something such that that it is antipollution and is univalent is not correct. sent11: the typhoon is albuminuric and it is a Shoshone. sent12: there exists something such that it is rustless thing that gins expletive. sent13: the typhoon is not bimodal but it does galumph. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is bimodal a catalog does not hold. sent15: the peludo is bimodal. sent16: the chapel is not a submarine. sent17: that the typhoon is a catalog and it does galumph is false. sent18: the peludo is not agronomic. sent19: if the chapel does not galumph then the fact that that the typhoon is both antipollution and agronomic is not correct hold. sent20: if something is not agronomic but a Gaelic it does not gin Ouse. sent21: the homunculus is not bimodal. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent15 -> int1: the peludo is not agronomic but it is a Gaelic.; sent20 -> int2: if the peludo is a kind of non-agronomic thing that is a Gaelic then it does not gin Ouse.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the peludo does not gin Ouse.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the chapel is antipollution and it is univalent is not true.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is antipollution and it is univalent is not right.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the homunculus is cambial.; sent17 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a catalog and it galumphs is incorrect.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the homunculus is crystalline.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the homunculus is cambial and it is crystalline.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__