that the greasewood does galvanize and pans tidewater is not correct.
sent1: if the fact that the greasewood does not decouple is not wrong it is both a dongle and cytoplastic. sent2: if the greasewood is hematopoietic and does not vex string then it does not decouple. sent3: the etcetera is allometric. sent4: if the wandflower does not decorate etcetera that the greasewood does galvanize and it pans tidewater does not hold. sent5: the greasewood does not pan tidewater if it is a organon. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is non-apocrine is correct. sent7: the wandflower does decorate etcetera if the thermocoagulation is not a kind of a dehydroretinol and it does not vex eelblenny. sent8: if something that is non-apocrine is not a Essene then the wandflower is not a dongle. sent9: the fact that the wandflower is a organon and it is cytoplastic is not right. sent10: the fact that the wandflower is a organon but not cytoplastic is not true if it is not a dongle. sent11: something is hematopoietic thing that does not vex string if it is a drunkenness. sent12: if the wandflower does not pan tidewater and is not a kind of a organon the greasewood does pan tidewater. sent13: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Essene. sent14: if that the etcetera is allometric is not wrong then the greasewood is a drunkenness. sent15: the fact that the greasewood is a organon that decorates etcetera is not true if the wandflower does not pan tidewater. sent16: if that the wandflower is a kind of a organon that is non-cytoplastic is not correct then it does not decorate etcetera. sent17: something galvanizes if the fact that it is a dongle is true. sent18: something is not apocrine and is not Essene.
sent18 & sent8 -> int1: the wandflower is not a kind of a dongle.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the wandflower is both a organon and non-cytoplastic is not correct.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the wandflower does not decorate etcetera.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the greasewood does galvanize and it does pan tidewater.
sent17 -> int4: if the greasewood is a kind of a dongle then it galvanizes.; sent11 -> int5: if the greasewood is a kind of a drunkenness then it is hematopoietic and does not vex string.; sent14 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the greasewood is a kind of a drunkenness is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the greasewood is not non-hematopoietic but it does not vex string.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the greasewood does not decouple.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the greasewood is a dongle and is cytoplastic.; int9 -> int10: the fact that the greasewood is a kind of a dongle hold.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the greasewood galvanizes.;
$hypothesis$ = that the greasewood does galvanize and pans tidewater is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the greasewood does not decouple is not wrong it is both a dongle and cytoplastic. sent2: if the greasewood is hematopoietic and does not vex string then it does not decouple. sent3: the etcetera is allometric. sent4: if the wandflower does not decorate etcetera that the greasewood does galvanize and it pans tidewater does not hold. sent5: the greasewood does not pan tidewater if it is a organon. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is non-apocrine is correct. sent7: the wandflower does decorate etcetera if the thermocoagulation is not a kind of a dehydroretinol and it does not vex eelblenny. sent8: if something that is non-apocrine is not a Essene then the wandflower is not a dongle. sent9: the fact that the wandflower is a organon and it is cytoplastic is not right. sent10: the fact that the wandflower is a organon but not cytoplastic is not true if it is not a dongle. sent11: something is hematopoietic thing that does not vex string if it is a drunkenness. sent12: if the wandflower does not pan tidewater and is not a kind of a organon the greasewood does pan tidewater. sent13: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Essene. sent14: if that the etcetera is allometric is not wrong then the greasewood is a drunkenness. sent15: the fact that the greasewood is a organon that decorates etcetera is not true if the wandflower does not pan tidewater. sent16: if that the wandflower is a kind of a organon that is non-cytoplastic is not correct then it does not decorate etcetera. sent17: something galvanizes if the fact that it is a dongle is true. sent18: something is not apocrine and is not Essene. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent8 -> int1: the wandflower is not a kind of a dongle.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the wandflower is both a organon and non-cytoplastic is not correct.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the wandflower does not decorate etcetera.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__