the nacreousness happens.
sent1: if that the makeover does not occur or the interjection occurs or both is wrong then the cerebralness does not occur. sent2: that the repayment does not occur and the breathlessness does not occur leads to that the skipping Marrano does not occur. sent3: if the interjection does not occur and the makeover does not occur the nacreousness does not occur. sent4: the glomming greatcoat occurs. sent5: if the skipping Marrano does not occur then the fossilization and the Singhaleseness occurs. sent6: the fact that the makeover does not occur or the interjection happens or both is not true. sent7: the subtilizing onomancer and/or the non-cerebralness occurs if the makeover does not occur. sent8: the makeover does not occur and the interjection does not occur if the woolenness does not occur. sent9: the cerebralness occurs if the fact that the subtilizing onomancer occurs is true. sent10: if the subtilizing onomancer does not occur then the nacreousness occurs. sent11: the cerebralness does not occur if the fact that that the makeover or the interjection or both occurs hold is false. sent12: the fact that the subtilizing onomancer does not occur but the cerebralness happens is not right if the nacreousness does not occur. sent13: the skipping idealist does not occur if the fact that the fact that the subtilizing onomancer does not occur but the cerebralness occurs is not correct is not wrong. sent14: the woolenness does not occur and the waltz happens if the fossilization happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subtilizing onomancer occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the cerebralness occurs.; sent1 & sent6 -> int2: the cerebralness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the subtilizing onomancer does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the nacreousness does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = the nacreousness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the makeover does not occur or the interjection occurs or both is wrong then the cerebralness does not occur. sent2: that the repayment does not occur and the breathlessness does not occur leads to that the skipping Marrano does not occur. sent3: if the interjection does not occur and the makeover does not occur the nacreousness does not occur. sent4: the glomming greatcoat occurs. sent5: if the skipping Marrano does not occur then the fossilization and the Singhaleseness occurs. sent6: the fact that the makeover does not occur or the interjection happens or both is not true. sent7: the subtilizing onomancer and/or the non-cerebralness occurs if the makeover does not occur. sent8: the makeover does not occur and the interjection does not occur if the woolenness does not occur. sent9: the cerebralness occurs if the fact that the subtilizing onomancer occurs is true. sent10: if the subtilizing onomancer does not occur then the nacreousness occurs. sent11: the cerebralness does not occur if the fact that that the makeover or the interjection or both occurs hold is false. sent12: the fact that the subtilizing onomancer does not occur but the cerebralness happens is not right if the nacreousness does not occur. sent13: the skipping idealist does not occur if the fact that the fact that the subtilizing onomancer does not occur but the cerebralness occurs is not correct is not wrong. sent14: the woolenness does not occur and the waltz happens if the fossilization happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subtilizing onomancer occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the cerebralness occurs.; sent1 & sent6 -> int2: the cerebralness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the subtilizing onomancer does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__