that the talking happens is true.
sent1: the callus occurs. sent2: if the fact that the blemishing logician does not occur is true the talking happens. sent3: if that the abjuring bourtree but not the abjuring Laos occurs is not right the indoctrination happens. sent4: the fact that the abjuring bourtree happens but the abjuring Laos does not occur is not correct if the wattage does not occur. sent5: the drawing occurs. sent6: the shuttingness occurs. sent7: the preserving manatee happens if the blemishing logician happens. sent8: that the wattage does not occur is triggered by that both the reflection and the infiniteness happens. sent9: the reflection is caused by the segment. sent10: the incompatibleness and/or that the talking does not occur is caused by that the shuttingness happens. sent11: the leaking causes that the non-shuttingness and the laparotomy happens. sent12: if the fact that the redistribution or the non-intradermalness or both happens does not hold then the blemishing logician does not occur. sent13: the non-shuttingness causes that the blemishing logician does not occur and the incompatibleness does not occur. sent14: both the incompatibleness and the shuttingness happens. sent15: that the talk occurs is prevented by that the blemishing logician does not occur and the incompatibleness does not occur. sent16: that both the polynomial and the ecclesiasticism occurs is not true if the translationalness does not occur. sent17: both the leaking and the preserving kerchief happens if the ecclesiasticism does not occur. sent18: the cephalometry does not occur. sent19: the ecclesiasticism does not occur if that both the polynomialness and the ecclesiasticism occurs is incorrect. sent20: if the Thainess does not occur then the sailing-race does not occur. sent21: that the mandibulofacialness does not occur prevents that the foal does not occur. sent22: if the indoctrination happens the sporadicness does not occur and the lulling instigator occurs. sent23: if the non-sporadicness and the lulling instigator occurs then the translationalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the redistribution and/or the non-intradermalness happens.; sent14 -> int1: the incompatibleness happens.;
the talk does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the talking happens is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the callus occurs. sent2: if the fact that the blemishing logician does not occur is true the talking happens. sent3: if that the abjuring bourtree but not the abjuring Laos occurs is not right the indoctrination happens. sent4: the fact that the abjuring bourtree happens but the abjuring Laos does not occur is not correct if the wattage does not occur. sent5: the drawing occurs. sent6: the shuttingness occurs. sent7: the preserving manatee happens if the blemishing logician happens. sent8: that the wattage does not occur is triggered by that both the reflection and the infiniteness happens. sent9: the reflection is caused by the segment. sent10: the incompatibleness and/or that the talking does not occur is caused by that the shuttingness happens. sent11: the leaking causes that the non-shuttingness and the laparotomy happens. sent12: if the fact that the redistribution or the non-intradermalness or both happens does not hold then the blemishing logician does not occur. sent13: the non-shuttingness causes that the blemishing logician does not occur and the incompatibleness does not occur. sent14: both the incompatibleness and the shuttingness happens. sent15: that the talk occurs is prevented by that the blemishing logician does not occur and the incompatibleness does not occur. sent16: that both the polynomial and the ecclesiasticism occurs is not true if the translationalness does not occur. sent17: both the leaking and the preserving kerchief happens if the ecclesiasticism does not occur. sent18: the cephalometry does not occur. sent19: the ecclesiasticism does not occur if that both the polynomialness and the ecclesiasticism occurs is incorrect. sent20: if the Thainess does not occur then the sailing-race does not occur. sent21: that the mandibulofacialness does not occur prevents that the foal does not occur. sent22: if the indoctrination happens the sporadicness does not occur and the lulling instigator occurs. sent23: if the non-sporadicness and the lulling instigator occurs then the translationalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the redistribution and/or the non-intradermalness happens.; sent14 -> int1: the incompatibleness happens.; __UNKNOWN__