the copilot is not a catechu.
sent1: if that the keeshond is a pharmaceutical but it is not a Ramadan is false the copilot is not a catechu. sent2: something is not a kind of a pharmaceutical if that it is a kind of a bookshop that does correct does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the keeshond resubmits pyroxylin and is macrobiotic does not hold it does not resubmits pyroxylin. sent4: if the keeshond does correct that the collage is not a bookshop but it is a kind of a pharmaceutical is false. sent5: the collage is a kind of a cleaners that is a kind of a Ramadan. sent6: if the keeshond is not a pharmaceutical then the copilot is not a kind of a catechu. sent7: the aperture is pharmaceutical and it is chondritic. sent8: the collage is a cleaners. sent9: something is a cleaners and/or is not a Ramadan if it is not pharmaceutical. sent10: if a catechu is a kind of a cleaners then it is not a Ramadan. sent11: that the keeshond resubmits pyroxylin and is macrobiotic is not true. sent12: if that the collage is a kind of a cleaners but it is not a catechu is not true then that the keeshond is not a Ramadan is not incorrect. sent13: if the keeshond does not resubmit pyroxylin it is correct and it conglutinates. sent14: if the collage is not a pharmaceutical then the pargeting is a catechu and it is a cleaners.
sent5 -> int1: the collage is a Ramadan.;
the pargeting is not a kind of a Ramadan.
sent10 -> int2: the pargeting is not a Ramadan if it is a catechu and is a cleaners.; sent2 -> int3: if the fact that the fact that the collage is a bookshop and does correct is correct does not hold then it is not pharmaceutical.;
$hypothesis$ = the copilot is not a catechu. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the keeshond is a pharmaceutical but it is not a Ramadan is false the copilot is not a catechu. sent2: something is not a kind of a pharmaceutical if that it is a kind of a bookshop that does correct does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the keeshond resubmits pyroxylin and is macrobiotic does not hold it does not resubmits pyroxylin. sent4: if the keeshond does correct that the collage is not a bookshop but it is a kind of a pharmaceutical is false. sent5: the collage is a kind of a cleaners that is a kind of a Ramadan. sent6: if the keeshond is not a pharmaceutical then the copilot is not a kind of a catechu. sent7: the aperture is pharmaceutical and it is chondritic. sent8: the collage is a cleaners. sent9: something is a cleaners and/or is not a Ramadan if it is not pharmaceutical. sent10: if a catechu is a kind of a cleaners then it is not a Ramadan. sent11: that the keeshond resubmits pyroxylin and is macrobiotic is not true. sent12: if that the collage is a kind of a cleaners but it is not a catechu is not true then that the keeshond is not a Ramadan is not incorrect. sent13: if the keeshond does not resubmit pyroxylin it is correct and it conglutinates. sent14: if the collage is not a pharmaceutical then the pargeting is a catechu and it is a cleaners. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the collage is a Ramadan.; __UNKNOWN__