that the vinaigrette is not a balm and it does not broil vinaigrette does not hold.
sent1: if the an is not Socratic then that it is unsuccessful and it is not a kind of a fracture is false. sent2: the fact that the vinaigrette is not a balm and does not broil vinaigrette is incorrect if the a does not broil vinaigrette. sent3: something is not a Glengarry and not a fund. sent4: the fact that the collard is unsuccessful hold if that the an is unsuccessful and is not a fracture is false. sent5: the vinaigrette is not azido if the fact that the spoilsport is a kind of azido thing that is a kind of an analyzer is not true. sent6: the collard is an analyzer if the spoilsport is both not a residual and premature. sent7: if that the spoilsport does not quarantine Waterloo hold then the fact that it is both not balletic and azido is false. sent8: if the collard is an analyzer and/or it is unsanitary then the a does not broil vinaigrette. sent9: something that is balletic is not a balm and does not broil vinaigrette. sent10: the fact that something does quarantine Waterloo and is not balletic is incorrect if it is not azido. sent11: that the fact that the spoilsport is azido an analyzer does not hold hold if the collard is sanitary. sent12: the spoilsport is not balletic but azido. sent13: if the fact that the spoilsport is not a kind of a residual but it is premature is false then it does not quarantine Waterloo. sent14: something is not unsanitary if it is unsuccessful.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the spoilsport is non-residual but it is premature is not true.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the spoilsport does not quarantine Waterloo.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the spoilsport is not balletic but it is azido is not true.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the spoilsport is not residual but it is premature.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the collard is an analyzer.; int5 -> int6: the collard is an analyzer and/or it is unsanitary.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the a does not broil vinaigrette.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the vinaigrette is not a balm and it does not broil vinaigrette.
sent9 -> int8: if the vinaigrette is balletic it is not a balm and does not broil vinaigrette.; sent10 -> int9: if the vinaigrette is not azido then that it quarantines Waterloo and it is not balletic does not hold.; sent14 -> int10: if the collard is unsuccessful it is not unsanitary.;
$hypothesis$ = that the vinaigrette is not a balm and it does not broil vinaigrette does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the an is not Socratic then that it is unsuccessful and it is not a kind of a fracture is false. sent2: the fact that the vinaigrette is not a balm and does not broil vinaigrette is incorrect if the a does not broil vinaigrette. sent3: something is not a Glengarry and not a fund. sent4: the fact that the collard is unsuccessful hold if that the an is unsuccessful and is not a fracture is false. sent5: the vinaigrette is not azido if the fact that the spoilsport is a kind of azido thing that is a kind of an analyzer is not true. sent6: the collard is an analyzer if the spoilsport is both not a residual and premature. sent7: if that the spoilsport does not quarantine Waterloo hold then the fact that it is both not balletic and azido is false. sent8: if the collard is an analyzer and/or it is unsanitary then the a does not broil vinaigrette. sent9: something that is balletic is not a balm and does not broil vinaigrette. sent10: the fact that something does quarantine Waterloo and is not balletic is incorrect if it is not azido. sent11: that the fact that the spoilsport is azido an analyzer does not hold hold if the collard is sanitary. sent12: the spoilsport is not balletic but azido. sent13: if the fact that the spoilsport is not a kind of a residual but it is premature is false then it does not quarantine Waterloo. sent14: something is not unsanitary if it is unsuccessful. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the spoilsport is non-residual but it is premature is not true.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the spoilsport does not quarantine Waterloo.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the spoilsport is not balletic but it is azido is not true.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the spoilsport is not residual but it is premature.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the collard is an analyzer.; int5 -> int6: the collard is an analyzer and/or it is unsanitary.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the a does not broil vinaigrette.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__