that the fact that both the therapeuticsness and the colloguing Perdicidae occurs is not false is incorrect.
sent1: the statesmanlikeness does not occur if the fact that the statesmanlikeness happens and the colloguing colonoscope does not occur is false. sent2: the underquoting happens. sent3: the regularness does not occur. sent4: the underquoting does not occur but the expiring bewilderment happens if the bronchospasm does not occur. sent5: the expiring bewilderment does not occur. sent6: if the underquoting does not occur the fact that both the stickling potted and the colloguing araroba happens is false. sent7: the top-downness happens if the grooming does not occur but the chaffiness happens. sent8: not the profitableness but the tunelessness occurs if the statesmanlikeness does not occur. sent9: if that both the stickling potted and the colloguing araroba occurs is incorrect then the therapeuticsness does not occur. sent10: if the dealings does not occur then not the cart but the impressing occurs. sent11: both the canopying and the underquoting happens. sent12: the stickling potted and the colloguing araroba happens if the expiring bewilderment does not occur. sent13: if that the chaffiness does not occur is true the winglessness occurs. sent14: if that the winglessness occurs is correct then the colloguing Perdicidae occurs. sent15: if the stickling potted happens then the therapeuticsness occurs. sent16: if both the non-profitableness and the tunelessness occurs then the bronchospasm does not occur. sent17: if the carting does not occur then the fact that that the statesmanlikeness happens and the colloguing colonoscope does not occur is correct is not correct. sent18: the vote does not occur. sent19: if the grooming does not occur the chaffiness does not occur. sent20: the revocation does not occur. sent21: the revocation does not occur and the canopy does not occur if the grooming occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grooming occurs.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the revocation does not occur and the canopying does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the canopy does not occur.; sent11 -> int3: the canopying occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the groom does not occur.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the chaffiness does not occur.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the winglessness occurs hold.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the colloguing Perdicidae occurs.; sent12 & sent5 -> int9: the stickling potted and the colloguing araroba happens.; int9 -> int10: the stickling potted occurs.; sent15 & int10 -> int11: the therapeuticsness occurs.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the therapeuticsness occurs and the colloguing Perdicidae occurs is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that both the therapeuticsness and the colloguing Perdicidae occurs is not false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the statesmanlikeness does not occur if the fact that the statesmanlikeness happens and the colloguing colonoscope does not occur is false. sent2: the underquoting happens. sent3: the regularness does not occur. sent4: the underquoting does not occur but the expiring bewilderment happens if the bronchospasm does not occur. sent5: the expiring bewilderment does not occur. sent6: if the underquoting does not occur the fact that both the stickling potted and the colloguing araroba happens is false. sent7: the top-downness happens if the grooming does not occur but the chaffiness happens. sent8: not the profitableness but the tunelessness occurs if the statesmanlikeness does not occur. sent9: if that both the stickling potted and the colloguing araroba occurs is incorrect then the therapeuticsness does not occur. sent10: if the dealings does not occur then not the cart but the impressing occurs. sent11: both the canopying and the underquoting happens. sent12: the stickling potted and the colloguing araroba happens if the expiring bewilderment does not occur. sent13: if that the chaffiness does not occur is true the winglessness occurs. sent14: if that the winglessness occurs is correct then the colloguing Perdicidae occurs. sent15: if the stickling potted happens then the therapeuticsness occurs. sent16: if both the non-profitableness and the tunelessness occurs then the bronchospasm does not occur. sent17: if the carting does not occur then the fact that that the statesmanlikeness happens and the colloguing colonoscope does not occur is correct is not correct. sent18: the vote does not occur. sent19: if the grooming does not occur the chaffiness does not occur. sent20: the revocation does not occur. sent21: the revocation does not occur and the canopy does not occur if the grooming occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grooming occurs.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the revocation does not occur and the canopying does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the canopy does not occur.; sent11 -> int3: the canopying occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the groom does not occur.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the chaffiness does not occur.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the winglessness occurs hold.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the colloguing Perdicidae occurs.; sent12 & sent5 -> int9: the stickling potted and the colloguing araroba happens.; int9 -> int10: the stickling potted occurs.; sent15 & int10 -> int11: the therapeuticsness occurs.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__