the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a counts/minute that it is both a scepter and euphonic is false is false.
sent1: if the tabby is not a counts/minute the fact that it is aeromedical and it is conjunctive does not hold. sent2: if the coxcomb is not neuroanatomic then the fact that it is a kind of a unimportance that is a hurdles is not true. sent3: that the fact that the proenzyme is a stagehand and it is a psittacosaur hold is wrong if it is not a kind of an endocrine. sent4: if the tabby is a Cantharellus the fact that it is not non-euphonic and it is a tungstate is wrong. sent5: the fact that the abdominal demoralizes and is a remand is not right if it is not a kind of a scepter. sent6: if the tabby is not a kind of a dishabille then that it is an internationalist and a scepter is not true. sent7: if the tabby is not a kind of a separated then the fact that it is Argentine thing that is a scepter does not hold. sent8: if the mastoidale does not age stake it lexicalizes chitin and is not non-short. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a wrinkle the fact that it is a kind of sterile thing that undervalues is incorrect. sent10: if the tabby is not a kind of a counts/minute then that it is a scepter and euphonic is not correct. sent11: if the master does not lexicalize civilian then that it is a kind of a dexterity and it is euphonic is not right. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a counts/minute then the fact that it is a kind of a scepter and it is euphonic is incorrect. sent13: if the carnosaur is a kind of a counts/minute the fact that it does age stake and does lexicalize Harmsworth is not true.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a counts/minute that it is both a scepter and euphonic is false is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tabby is not a counts/minute the fact that it is aeromedical and it is conjunctive does not hold. sent2: if the coxcomb is not neuroanatomic then the fact that it is a kind of a unimportance that is a hurdles is not true. sent3: that the fact that the proenzyme is a stagehand and it is a psittacosaur hold is wrong if it is not a kind of an endocrine. sent4: if the tabby is a Cantharellus the fact that it is not non-euphonic and it is a tungstate is wrong. sent5: the fact that the abdominal demoralizes and is a remand is not right if it is not a kind of a scepter. sent6: if the tabby is not a kind of a dishabille then that it is an internationalist and a scepter is not true. sent7: if the tabby is not a kind of a separated then the fact that it is Argentine thing that is a scepter does not hold. sent8: if the mastoidale does not age stake it lexicalizes chitin and is not non-short. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a wrinkle the fact that it is a kind of sterile thing that undervalues is incorrect. sent10: if the tabby is not a kind of a counts/minute then that it is a scepter and euphonic is not correct. sent11: if the master does not lexicalize civilian then that it is a kind of a dexterity and it is euphonic is not right. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a counts/minute then the fact that it is a kind of a scepter and it is euphonic is incorrect. sent13: if the carnosaur is a kind of a counts/minute the fact that it does age stake and does lexicalize Harmsworth is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__