the culvert is intrusive and it is a kind of a ETF.
sent1: the agora is unsympathetic. sent2: the culvert is unsympathetic or not a dipped or both if the fact that the agora does not ventilate is not wrong. sent3: the priest is either tartaric or not reductionist or both. sent4: if something is not a kind of a weave then the fact that it is intrusive and is a ETF does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is unsympathetic if either it is unsympathetic or it does not dip or both hold. sent6: the agora is a dipped but not inoperable. sent7: the kernel is not a ETF if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an equalization. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it grubs megaton and it is a nymphalid does not hold. sent9: something ventilates and is ergotic if it is not reductionist. sent10: the stopper is not ergotic. sent11: the kernel grubs megaton. sent12: the culvert does not ventilate. sent13: the fact that the priest is not an equalization but it is unsympathetic is wrong if the kernel is not a kind of an equalization. sent14: the culvert does not weave if it is not a kind of an equalization and/or it is not inoperable. sent15: if that the priest is both not an equalization and unsympathetic is not correct the culvert is intrusive. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does grub megaton and it is a nymphalid is incorrect the agora does not weave. sent17: if the stopper is an equalization that the kernel does ventilate hold. sent18: the kernel is not an equalization if the agora does not weave and is not inoperable. sent19: if something is unsympathetic either it is not an equalization or it is operable or both. sent20: if the stopper is not an equalization and is not a weave the kernel is not a ETF. sent21: if the kernel ventilates then the agora does not ventilates. sent22: if the stopper is not ergotic then it does ventilate and is a ETF. sent23: if the stopper is a ETF the culvert is a ETF.
sent8 & sent16 -> int1: the agora is not a weave.; sent6 -> int2: that the agora is not inoperable hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the agora is not a kind of a weave and it is not inoperable.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: that the kernel is not an equalization is correct.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the priest is not an equalization and is unsympathetic is not true.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the culvert is intrusive.; sent22 & sent10 -> int7: the stopper ventilates and it is a ETF.; int7 -> int8: the stopper is a ETF.; sent23 & int8 -> int9: the culvert is a ETF.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the culvert is both intrusive and a ETF is not right.
sent4 -> int10: that the culvert is not unintrusive but a ETF is false if it is not a weave.; sent19 -> int11: if the culvert is unsympathetic either it is not a kind of an equalization or it is not inoperable or both.; sent5 -> int12: the culvert is unsympathetic if that it is unsympathetic and/or is not a kind of a dipped is right.; sent9 -> int13: if the kernel is not reductionist it ventilates and is ergotic.;
$hypothesis$ = the culvert is intrusive and it is a kind of a ETF. ; $context$ = sent1: the agora is unsympathetic. sent2: the culvert is unsympathetic or not a dipped or both if the fact that the agora does not ventilate is not wrong. sent3: the priest is either tartaric or not reductionist or both. sent4: if something is not a kind of a weave then the fact that it is intrusive and is a ETF does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is unsympathetic if either it is unsympathetic or it does not dip or both hold. sent6: the agora is a dipped but not inoperable. sent7: the kernel is not a ETF if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an equalization. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it grubs megaton and it is a nymphalid does not hold. sent9: something ventilates and is ergotic if it is not reductionist. sent10: the stopper is not ergotic. sent11: the kernel grubs megaton. sent12: the culvert does not ventilate. sent13: the fact that the priest is not an equalization but it is unsympathetic is wrong if the kernel is not a kind of an equalization. sent14: the culvert does not weave if it is not a kind of an equalization and/or it is not inoperable. sent15: if that the priest is both not an equalization and unsympathetic is not correct the culvert is intrusive. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does grub megaton and it is a nymphalid is incorrect the agora does not weave. sent17: if the stopper is an equalization that the kernel does ventilate hold. sent18: the kernel is not an equalization if the agora does not weave and is not inoperable. sent19: if something is unsympathetic either it is not an equalization or it is operable or both. sent20: if the stopper is not an equalization and is not a weave the kernel is not a ETF. sent21: if the kernel ventilates then the agora does not ventilates. sent22: if the stopper is not ergotic then it does ventilate and is a ETF. sent23: if the stopper is a ETF the culvert is a ETF. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent16 -> int1: the agora is not a weave.; sent6 -> int2: that the agora is not inoperable hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the agora is not a kind of a weave and it is not inoperable.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: that the kernel is not an equalization is correct.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the priest is not an equalization and is unsympathetic is not true.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the culvert is intrusive.; sent22 & sent10 -> int7: the stopper ventilates and it is a ETF.; int7 -> int8: the stopper is a ETF.; sent23 & int8 -> int9: the culvert is a ETF.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__