the fact that if the cinch is non-nasty then the fact that the haggler is not carposporic but it is a kind of a Schrodinger is not correct does not hold.
sent1: the telethermometer is not a kind of a homospory. sent2: the fact that the dashboard is a kind of a jack that is not a ribbonfish is not true. sent3: the dashboard does jack if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a jack and it is not a law is not true. sent4: if the haggler is not a kind of a Schrodinger then the fact that that the dashboard is not an overkill but electrostatic does not hold is not false. sent5: if the cinch is not a decasyllable then the haggler is not nasty but it is carposporic. sent6: the haggler is a Schrodinger and a decasyllable. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not nasty that the cyst is a ribbonfish and it is an overkill is not right. sent8: the atom is not a decasyllable if that the haggler is a kind of a homospory and it is a kind of a Schrodinger does not hold. sent9: if the telethermometer is not a homospory the fact that the dragnet is not a jack and it is not a law does not hold. sent10: the cyst is not a ribbonfish if the atom is not a kind of a ribbonfish and it is not a kind of a decasyllable. sent11: the fact that the haggler is not carposporic and is a Schrodinger is not true if the dashboard is not a kind of a Schrodinger. sent12: if that the cyst is a ribbonfish and is an overkill is incorrect then the atom is not a decasyllable. sent13: if the atom is not a decasyllable the dashboard consummates and is not electrostatic. sent14: that the cyst is a kind of an overkill but it is not nasty is incorrect if it is not a kind of a ribbonfish. sent15: if the dashboard is a kind of a jack and does consummate it is not a Schrodinger.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cinch is non-nasty is true.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not nasty.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that that the cyst is a ribbonfish and it is an overkill is right does not hold.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the atom is not a kind of a decasyllable.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the dashboard consummates and is not electrostatic.; int4 -> int5: the dashboard consummates.; sent9 & sent1 -> int6: that the fact that the dragnet does not jack and it is not a kind of a law does not hold is correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not jack and is not a law does not hold.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the dashboard is a kind of a jack.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the dashboard does jack and consummates.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the dashboard is not a Schrodinger.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the fact that the haggler is not carposporic but it is a Schrodinger is wrong.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the leftovers does not consummate hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the cinch is non-nasty then the fact that the haggler is not carposporic but it is a kind of a Schrodinger is not correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the telethermometer is not a kind of a homospory. sent2: the fact that the dashboard is a kind of a jack that is not a ribbonfish is not true. sent3: the dashboard does jack if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a jack and it is not a law is not true. sent4: if the haggler is not a kind of a Schrodinger then the fact that that the dashboard is not an overkill but electrostatic does not hold is not false. sent5: if the cinch is not a decasyllable then the haggler is not nasty but it is carposporic. sent6: the haggler is a Schrodinger and a decasyllable. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not nasty that the cyst is a ribbonfish and it is an overkill is not right. sent8: the atom is not a decasyllable if that the haggler is a kind of a homospory and it is a kind of a Schrodinger does not hold. sent9: if the telethermometer is not a homospory the fact that the dragnet is not a jack and it is not a law does not hold. sent10: the cyst is not a ribbonfish if the atom is not a kind of a ribbonfish and it is not a kind of a decasyllable. sent11: the fact that the haggler is not carposporic and is a Schrodinger is not true if the dashboard is not a kind of a Schrodinger. sent12: if that the cyst is a ribbonfish and is an overkill is incorrect then the atom is not a decasyllable. sent13: if the atom is not a decasyllable the dashboard consummates and is not electrostatic. sent14: that the cyst is a kind of an overkill but it is not nasty is incorrect if it is not a kind of a ribbonfish. sent15: if the dashboard is a kind of a jack and does consummate it is not a Schrodinger. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cinch is non-nasty is true.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not nasty.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that that the cyst is a ribbonfish and it is an overkill is right does not hold.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the atom is not a kind of a decasyllable.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the dashboard consummates and is not electrostatic.; int4 -> int5: the dashboard consummates.; sent9 & sent1 -> int6: that the fact that the dragnet does not jack and it is not a kind of a law does not hold is correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not jack and is not a law does not hold.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the dashboard is a kind of a jack.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the dashboard does jack and consummates.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the dashboard is not a Schrodinger.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the fact that the haggler is not carposporic but it is a Schrodinger is wrong.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__