the macadamia is likable thing that is not collegiate.
sent1: the eburnation is not a concertina. sent2: the macadamia is likable but it is not collegiate if the eburnation is not collegiate. sent3: if the boat is not a kind of a flagfish then that it is collegiate thing that is not a concertina is not right. sent4: the fact that the eburnation is spectral but not microbial is wrong. sent5: the eburnation is non-unneurotic thing that is not propitious. sent6: if the boat is undiplomatic then it is not a kind of a flagfish. sent7: if the eburnation is not collegiate the boat is not collegiate. sent8: the macadamia is not undiplomatic. sent9: if the macadamia is non-likable the boat is not non-likable. sent10: if that the boat is collegiate and is not a concertina is not right then the fact that it is not likable is not incorrect. sent11: the macadamia is not collegiate if the eburnation is not collegiate. sent12: the eburnation is likable but not a flagfish. sent13: the fact that the boat is undiplomatic but it is not likable is not correct. sent14: if the boat is not splashy then the fact that that it is a flagfish that is not collegiate is true is not true. sent15: that something is splashy but it is not undiplomatic is not correct if it does not concert. sent16: if the fact that the boat is not a kind of a flagfish is not false the eburnation is not a concertina and it is not a flagfish. sent17: the boat is not a concertina. sent18: the eburnation is not collegiate and it is not a flagfish if the boat is not a flagfish. sent19: the eburnation is not a flagfish. sent20: if something is not collegiate that it is a flagfish and it is not undiplomatic does not hold. sent21: the macadamia is not collegiate.
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the boat is splashy but it is not undiplomatic does not hold if it is not a concertina.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the boat is splashy but it is not undiplomatic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the macadamia is likable thing that is not collegiate. ; $context$ = sent1: the eburnation is not a concertina. sent2: the macadamia is likable but it is not collegiate if the eburnation is not collegiate. sent3: if the boat is not a kind of a flagfish then that it is collegiate thing that is not a concertina is not right. sent4: the fact that the eburnation is spectral but not microbial is wrong. sent5: the eburnation is non-unneurotic thing that is not propitious. sent6: if the boat is undiplomatic then it is not a kind of a flagfish. sent7: if the eburnation is not collegiate the boat is not collegiate. sent8: the macadamia is not undiplomatic. sent9: if the macadamia is non-likable the boat is not non-likable. sent10: if that the boat is collegiate and is not a concertina is not right then the fact that it is not likable is not incorrect. sent11: the macadamia is not collegiate if the eburnation is not collegiate. sent12: the eburnation is likable but not a flagfish. sent13: the fact that the boat is undiplomatic but it is not likable is not correct. sent14: if the boat is not splashy then the fact that that it is a flagfish that is not collegiate is true is not true. sent15: that something is splashy but it is not undiplomatic is not correct if it does not concert. sent16: if the fact that the boat is not a kind of a flagfish is not false the eburnation is not a concertina and it is not a flagfish. sent17: the boat is not a concertina. sent18: the eburnation is not collegiate and it is not a flagfish if the boat is not a flagfish. sent19: the eburnation is not a flagfish. sent20: if something is not collegiate that it is a flagfish and it is not undiplomatic does not hold. sent21: the macadamia is not collegiate. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the boat is splashy but it is not undiplomatic does not hold if it is not a concertina.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the boat is splashy but it is not undiplomatic does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__