the limiter is not exaugural.
sent1: if the Numidian is not postural then the limiter is exaugural. sent2: the saltire is not a etui and it is not a Chlamydera. sent3: if that the saltire is not unintelligent is not false it is not metallurgical and/or it is not exaugural. sent4: the limiter is exaugural if the Numidian is not metallurgical. sent5: if that something is not a Jacobean and it does not nettle is not correct it is not nonexplosive. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a Chlamydera and it is a etui is incorrect if it is not unintelligent. sent7: the Numidian is not unintelligent if there exists something such that it is not metallurgical and/or it sends emigration. sent8: if something is not a kind of a Chlamydera then the fact that the saltire is a kind of exaugural thing that is not a etui does not hold. sent9: if there is something such that it is not unintelligent and/or it is metallurgical then the saltire is not unintelligent. sent10: something is not a Chlamydera if it is unintelligent. sent11: the littleneck does not consternate dining-room and injects if the jellyleaf is not nonexplosive. sent12: the plankton is plantal and it is a rabbitwood if the maisonette does not consternate windfall. sent13: if the limiter is not plantal then it is a kind of postural thing that is not non-exaugural. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is a Chlamydera and it is a etui is false the icepick does not send emigration. sent15: that the jellyleaf is both non-Jacobean and not a nettle is incorrect. sent16: if there is something such that it is postural then the Numidian is not unintelligent or it is metallurgical or both. sent17: that something is not metallurgical and is not postural is not true if it is plantal. sent18: if there exists something such that either it is not a Chlamydera or it is unintelligent or both the Numidian does not send emigration. sent19: there exists something such that it is either not exaugural or a etui or both. sent20: something that does not send emigration is either not metallurgical or not postural or both. sent21: the maisonette does not consternate windfall if there exists something such that it does not consternate dining-room and does inject.
sent2 -> int1: the saltire is not a kind of a Chlamydera.; int1 -> int2: the saltire is not a Chlamydera and/or it is unintelligent.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a Chlamydera and/or it is unintelligent.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the Numidian does not send emigration.; sent20 -> int5: the Numidian is not metallurgical and/or it is not postural if it does not send emigration.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Numidian is not metallurgical and/or it is non-postural.; int6 & sent4 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the icepick does not send emigration.
sent6 -> int7: if the saltire is not unintelligent that it is a Chlamydera that is a etui is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the limiter is not exaugural. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Numidian is not postural then the limiter is exaugural. sent2: the saltire is not a etui and it is not a Chlamydera. sent3: if that the saltire is not unintelligent is not false it is not metallurgical and/or it is not exaugural. sent4: the limiter is exaugural if the Numidian is not metallurgical. sent5: if that something is not a Jacobean and it does not nettle is not correct it is not nonexplosive. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a Chlamydera and it is a etui is incorrect if it is not unintelligent. sent7: the Numidian is not unintelligent if there exists something such that it is not metallurgical and/or it sends emigration. sent8: if something is not a kind of a Chlamydera then the fact that the saltire is a kind of exaugural thing that is not a etui does not hold. sent9: if there is something such that it is not unintelligent and/or it is metallurgical then the saltire is not unintelligent. sent10: something is not a Chlamydera if it is unintelligent. sent11: the littleneck does not consternate dining-room and injects if the jellyleaf is not nonexplosive. sent12: the plankton is plantal and it is a rabbitwood if the maisonette does not consternate windfall. sent13: if the limiter is not plantal then it is a kind of postural thing that is not non-exaugural. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is a Chlamydera and it is a etui is false the icepick does not send emigration. sent15: that the jellyleaf is both non-Jacobean and not a nettle is incorrect. sent16: if there is something such that it is postural then the Numidian is not unintelligent or it is metallurgical or both. sent17: that something is not metallurgical and is not postural is not true if it is plantal. sent18: if there exists something such that either it is not a Chlamydera or it is unintelligent or both the Numidian does not send emigration. sent19: there exists something such that it is either not exaugural or a etui or both. sent20: something that does not send emigration is either not metallurgical or not postural or both. sent21: the maisonette does not consternate windfall if there exists something such that it does not consternate dining-room and does inject. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the saltire is not a kind of a Chlamydera.; int1 -> int2: the saltire is not a Chlamydera and/or it is unintelligent.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a Chlamydera and/or it is unintelligent.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the Numidian does not send emigration.; sent20 -> int5: the Numidian is not metallurgical and/or it is not postural if it does not send emigration.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Numidian is not metallurgical and/or it is non-postural.; int6 & sent4 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__