the forecaster does not segregate Freudian.
sent1: if that that the forecaster is onomatopoeic but it is not a sleeper is not incorrect is not right the astrodome is not a sleeper. sent2: if that something does carjack astrodome and does dock is not correct then it does not segregate Freudian. sent3: that something is a Grenadian is correct. sent4: if the fact that the ailanthus is parasitic thing that does dado suede is not right the forecaster is not a sleeper. sent5: if there is something such that it is a Grenadian that the ailanthus is a kind of parasitic thing that dadoes suede does not hold. sent6: the forecaster is not a kind of a corded. sent7: if something is not onomatopoeic then that it does carjack astrodome and is a dock is wrong. sent8: if something is not a kind of a corded but it is onomatopoeic then it is a sleeper. sent9: something that is not a dock does carjack astrodome and is a corded.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the forecaster is onomatopoeic.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the forecaster is not a kind of a corded but it is onomatopoeic.; sent8 -> int2: the forecaster is a sleeper if that it is not a corded and it is onomatopoeic is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the forecaster is a sleeper.; sent3 & sent5 -> int4: that the ailanthus is parasitic and it dadoes suede is not right.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the forecaster is not a sleeper.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the forecaster is not onomatopoeic.; sent7 -> int8: the fact that the forecaster does carjack astrodome and is a dock is not correct if it is not onomatopoeic.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the forecaster carjacks astrodome and it is a dock does not hold.; sent2 -> int10: the forecaster does not segregate Freudian if the fact that it carjacks astrodome and it is a dock is not correct.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the astrodome is not a kind of a sleeper is not incorrect.
sent9 -> int11: the ailanthus carjacks astrodome and it does cord if it does not dock.;
$hypothesis$ = the forecaster does not segregate Freudian. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that the forecaster is onomatopoeic but it is not a sleeper is not incorrect is not right the astrodome is not a sleeper. sent2: if that something does carjack astrodome and does dock is not correct then it does not segregate Freudian. sent3: that something is a Grenadian is correct. sent4: if the fact that the ailanthus is parasitic thing that does dado suede is not right the forecaster is not a sleeper. sent5: if there is something such that it is a Grenadian that the ailanthus is a kind of parasitic thing that dadoes suede does not hold. sent6: the forecaster is not a kind of a corded. sent7: if something is not onomatopoeic then that it does carjack astrodome and is a dock is wrong. sent8: if something is not a kind of a corded but it is onomatopoeic then it is a sleeper. sent9: something that is not a dock does carjack astrodome and is a corded. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the forecaster is onomatopoeic.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the forecaster is not a kind of a corded but it is onomatopoeic.; sent8 -> int2: the forecaster is a sleeper if that it is not a corded and it is onomatopoeic is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the forecaster is a sleeper.; sent3 & sent5 -> int4: that the ailanthus is parasitic and it dadoes suede is not right.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the forecaster is not a sleeper.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the forecaster is not onomatopoeic.; sent7 -> int8: the fact that the forecaster does carjack astrodome and is a dock is not correct if it is not onomatopoeic.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the forecaster carjacks astrodome and it is a dock does not hold.; sent2 -> int10: the forecaster does not segregate Freudian if the fact that it carjacks astrodome and it is a dock is not correct.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__