the complecting whelk does not occur and the no-hitter does not occur.
sent1: the glomming Wagner occurs. sent2: the glomming re-creation happens. sent3: the declassification does not occur but the complecting decline happens if the clitoridectomy does not occur. sent4: the jerking does not occur if that the defoliating Cotswolds does not occur and the complecting whelk does not occur is false. sent5: the defoliating huitre does not occur. sent6: that not the starvation but the glomming re-creation happens yields that the complecting whelk does not occur. sent7: the defoliating maxim does not occur. sent8: the defoliating Cotswolds does not occur. sent9: the martyrdom does not occur but the conjunctiveness happens. sent10: the regular does not occur. sent11: if the breakaway happens the no-hitter happens. sent12: the igneousness happens. sent13: the fact that the schematization does not occur is true. sent14: the cryptobioticness does not occur. sent15: if the Episcopalness occurs then both the unneuroticness and the non-animatingness happens. sent16: the no-hitter does not occur and the breakaway does not occur if the consummation occurs. sent17: the breakaway does not occur. sent18: the flighting does not occur. sent19: the locomotion does not occur. sent20: the starvation does not occur and the glomming re-creation occurs if the fact that the defoliating Cotswolds does not occur is true. sent21: the resigning does not occur. sent22: the consummation occurs. sent23: that the breakaway does not occur is not false if the consummation happens. sent24: if the fact that the defoliating Cotswolds does not occur is not false then the glomming re-creation happens.
sent20 & sent8 -> int1: the starvation does not occur but the glomming re-creation happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the complecting whelk does not occur.; sent16 & sent22 -> int3: the no-hitter does not occur and the breakaway does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the no-hitter does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the jerk does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the complecting whelk does not occur and the no-hitter does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the glomming Wagner occurs. sent2: the glomming re-creation happens. sent3: the declassification does not occur but the complecting decline happens if the clitoridectomy does not occur. sent4: the jerking does not occur if that the defoliating Cotswolds does not occur and the complecting whelk does not occur is false. sent5: the defoliating huitre does not occur. sent6: that not the starvation but the glomming re-creation happens yields that the complecting whelk does not occur. sent7: the defoliating maxim does not occur. sent8: the defoliating Cotswolds does not occur. sent9: the martyrdom does not occur but the conjunctiveness happens. sent10: the regular does not occur. sent11: if the breakaway happens the no-hitter happens. sent12: the igneousness happens. sent13: the fact that the schematization does not occur is true. sent14: the cryptobioticness does not occur. sent15: if the Episcopalness occurs then both the unneuroticness and the non-animatingness happens. sent16: the no-hitter does not occur and the breakaway does not occur if the consummation occurs. sent17: the breakaway does not occur. sent18: the flighting does not occur. sent19: the locomotion does not occur. sent20: the starvation does not occur and the glomming re-creation occurs if the fact that the defoliating Cotswolds does not occur is true. sent21: the resigning does not occur. sent22: the consummation occurs. sent23: that the breakaway does not occur is not false if the consummation happens. sent24: if the fact that the defoliating Cotswolds does not occur is not false then the glomming re-creation happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent8 -> int1: the starvation does not occur but the glomming re-creation happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the complecting whelk does not occur.; sent16 & sent22 -> int3: the no-hitter does not occur and the breakaway does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the no-hitter does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__