the fact that there is something such that if it is absorbable then it is either not a subdominant or a Sillaginidae or both does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it does shatter draped it does not crystallize lingam or it is statistical or both. sent2: the fact that there is something such that if it is absorbable it is a subdominant and/or it is a Sillaginidae is correct. sent3: the tuber is not a subdominant and/or it is a Sillaginidae if it is absorbable. sent4: something is not a Musial and/or is Bantoid if it is absorbable. sent5: if the hotchpotch is tractable then it is not a weathervane and/or does reline tuber. sent6: there is something such that if it shatters facilitator either it is not a Finland or it is a meson or both. sent7: something is either not a Tahitian or a subdominant or both if it welds Montevideo. sent8: if the nosewheel is absorbable it is not fathomable or it is a reflectometer or both. sent9: if the tuber is absorbable then it is a subdominant and/or it is a Sillaginidae. sent10: if the tuber is an intent then it is not a Sillaginidae or is synaptic or both. sent11: if the tuber is a Notoryctidae it either is not unlawful or is definite or both. sent12: there exists something such that if it does rob it either is not a pulque or is aground or both. sent13: if the philodendron does rob then it is not absorbable and/or it does bed-hop. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a job it is not pneumonic or is quincentennial or both. sent15: there is something such that if that it is Bantoid hold then it does not crystallize deflagration and/or it is environmental. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a quincentennial then it is not eonian and/or is postal.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the Cabernet is not a Musial or it is Bantoid or both if it is absorbable.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is absorbable then it is either not a subdominant or a Sillaginidae or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does shatter draped it does not crystallize lingam or it is statistical or both. sent2: the fact that there is something such that if it is absorbable it is a subdominant and/or it is a Sillaginidae is correct. sent3: the tuber is not a subdominant and/or it is a Sillaginidae if it is absorbable. sent4: something is not a Musial and/or is Bantoid if it is absorbable. sent5: if the hotchpotch is tractable then it is not a weathervane and/or does reline tuber. sent6: there is something such that if it shatters facilitator either it is not a Finland or it is a meson or both. sent7: something is either not a Tahitian or a subdominant or both if it welds Montevideo. sent8: if the nosewheel is absorbable it is not fathomable or it is a reflectometer or both. sent9: if the tuber is absorbable then it is a subdominant and/or it is a Sillaginidae. sent10: if the tuber is an intent then it is not a Sillaginidae or is synaptic or both. sent11: if the tuber is a Notoryctidae it either is not unlawful or is definite or both. sent12: there exists something such that if it does rob it either is not a pulque or is aground or both. sent13: if the philodendron does rob then it is not absorbable and/or it does bed-hop. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a job it is not pneumonic or is quincentennial or both. sent15: there is something such that if that it is Bantoid hold then it does not crystallize deflagration and/or it is environmental. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a quincentennial then it is not eonian and/or is postal. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__