the fact that there is something such that if it does not anticipate copyright then the fact that it is not a Chernobyl and does not anticipate Rilke is not correct is false.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not epicarpal the fact that the fact that it is a kind of an eightieth that is not a Alosa hold is not right. sent2: if the faller does not anticipate copyright the fact that it is a kind of a Chernobyl that does not anticipate Rilke is false. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not anticipate copyright then it is not a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke. sent4: there is something such that if it is not unintrusive then that it is not epicarpal and it is a kayak is not right. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it does anticipate copyright hold then that it is not a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke is not correct. sent6: if something does not bullshit jerky the fact that it is not a defervescence and is not a indiction is not true. sent7: there is something such that if it does not anticipate copyright that it is a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke is wrong. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke is wrong if it does not anticipate copyright. sent9: if something is not a Anoectochilus the fact that that it is a kind of non-comic thing that does anticipate scatter is correct is false.
sent8 -> int1: if the faller does not anticipate copyright the fact that it is not a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
that the mistflower is not a defervescence and it is not a indiction is not true if it does not bullshit jerky.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not anticipate copyright then the fact that it is not a Chernobyl and does not anticipate Rilke is not correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not epicarpal the fact that the fact that it is a kind of an eightieth that is not a Alosa hold is not right. sent2: if the faller does not anticipate copyright the fact that it is a kind of a Chernobyl that does not anticipate Rilke is false. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not anticipate copyright then it is not a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke. sent4: there is something such that if it is not unintrusive then that it is not epicarpal and it is a kayak is not right. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it does anticipate copyright hold then that it is not a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke is not correct. sent6: if something does not bullshit jerky the fact that it is not a defervescence and is not a indiction is not true. sent7: there is something such that if it does not anticipate copyright that it is a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke is wrong. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke is wrong if it does not anticipate copyright. sent9: if something is not a Anoectochilus the fact that that it is a kind of non-comic thing that does anticipate scatter is correct is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the faller does not anticipate copyright the fact that it is not a Chernobyl and it does not anticipate Rilke is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__