there is something such that if that it does deny bidet and it is expiatory is wrong then it is not a kind of a hire.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is a kind of pubertal a scriber does not hold then it does not deny mebibit. sent2: if the twin is not expiatory then it does not hire. sent3: there is something such that if it does not deny bidet then it does not hire. sent4: if that something denies bidet and it is expiatory does not hold it does not hire. sent5: there exists something such that if that it beckons calculation and it is lentic is false then it does not beware. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it denies bidet and is expiatory is incorrect then it is a kind of a hire. sent7: if the fact that the twin does deny bidet and is expiatory is incorrect it is a kind of a hire. sent8: if the fact that the colophon is both expiatory and a Saharan is not right it is not cheliceral. sent9: there is something such that if that it is not expiatory hold it is not a kind of a hire. sent10: the twin does not hire if it does deny bidet and is expiatory. sent11: there is something such that if it does deny bidet and it is not non-expiatory it is not a hire. sent12: if the fact that something is a kind of Bahamian thing that is Aeschylean is incorrect it is not a quiz. sent13: the sheepwalk is not a pawer if the fact that it is a kind of a hire and it is a tanbark is incorrect. sent14: if something that does deny bidet is expiatory it is not a hire. sent15: if the fact that something denies bidet and it is expiatory does not hold then it is a hire.
sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the fact that the twin does deny bidet and is expiatory is not right is correct it is not a hire.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does deny bidet and it is expiatory is wrong then it is not a kind of a hire. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is a kind of pubertal a scriber does not hold then it does not deny mebibit. sent2: if the twin is not expiatory then it does not hire. sent3: there is something such that if it does not deny bidet then it does not hire. sent4: if that something denies bidet and it is expiatory does not hold it does not hire. sent5: there exists something such that if that it beckons calculation and it is lentic is false then it does not beware. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it denies bidet and is expiatory is incorrect then it is a kind of a hire. sent7: if the fact that the twin does deny bidet and is expiatory is incorrect it is a kind of a hire. sent8: if the fact that the colophon is both expiatory and a Saharan is not right it is not cheliceral. sent9: there is something such that if that it is not expiatory hold it is not a kind of a hire. sent10: the twin does not hire if it does deny bidet and is expiatory. sent11: there is something such that if it does deny bidet and it is not non-expiatory it is not a hire. sent12: if the fact that something is a kind of Bahamian thing that is Aeschylean is incorrect it is not a quiz. sent13: the sheepwalk is not a pawer if the fact that it is a kind of a hire and it is a tanbark is incorrect. sent14: if something that does deny bidet is expiatory it is not a hire. sent15: if the fact that something denies bidet and it is expiatory does not hold then it is a hire. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the fact that the twin does deny bidet and is expiatory is not right is correct it is not a hire.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__