the sparkling Acipenseridae does not occur.
sent1: that the headway occurs hold if that the headway occurs and/or the banishment does not occur hold. sent2: the censoring but not the kissing happens if that that the sparkling satyr occurs is not incorrect is not true. sent3: that the thrilling does not occur triggers that the couple but not the autoplasticness happens. sent4: the realness does not occur. sent5: if the flawing does not occur the immutableness occurs. sent6: not the Indianness but the headway occurs. sent7: the biding happens. sent8: the prolonging happens. sent9: the divisionalness happens. sent10: if the kiss does not occur the sparkling Acipenseridae does not occur. sent11: that the kissing occurs triggers that the Indian does not occur and/or the sparkling satyr. sent12: the banishment does not occur if that the investigating kanchil does not occur and the banishment occurs is not true. sent13: if the sparkling Acipenseridae occurs then that the censoring does not occur and the kiss does not occur does not hold. sent14: if the subscriptness does not occur the compacting inferior occurs. sent15: that not the sparkling satyr but the Indian occurs causes the non-saurianness. sent16: the investigating Dhahran occurs. sent17: the sparkling fender-bender occurs. sent18: the Indianness happens if that the sparkling satyr occurs is right. sent19: if the sparkling satyr does not occur then the censoring occurs. sent20: not the immutableness but the compacting catsup occurs. sent21: the bestness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sparkling satyr happens.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the Indianness occurs.; sent6 -> int2: the Indian does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sparkling satyr does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the censoring happens but the kissing does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the kissing does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the sparkling Acipenseridae happens.
$hypothesis$ = the sparkling Acipenseridae does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the headway occurs hold if that the headway occurs and/or the banishment does not occur hold. sent2: the censoring but not the kissing happens if that that the sparkling satyr occurs is not incorrect is not true. sent3: that the thrilling does not occur triggers that the couple but not the autoplasticness happens. sent4: the realness does not occur. sent5: if the flawing does not occur the immutableness occurs. sent6: not the Indianness but the headway occurs. sent7: the biding happens. sent8: the prolonging happens. sent9: the divisionalness happens. sent10: if the kiss does not occur the sparkling Acipenseridae does not occur. sent11: that the kissing occurs triggers that the Indian does not occur and/or the sparkling satyr. sent12: the banishment does not occur if that the investigating kanchil does not occur and the banishment occurs is not true. sent13: if the sparkling Acipenseridae occurs then that the censoring does not occur and the kiss does not occur does not hold. sent14: if the subscriptness does not occur the compacting inferior occurs. sent15: that not the sparkling satyr but the Indian occurs causes the non-saurianness. sent16: the investigating Dhahran occurs. sent17: the sparkling fender-bender occurs. sent18: the Indianness happens if that the sparkling satyr occurs is right. sent19: if the sparkling satyr does not occur then the censoring occurs. sent20: not the immutableness but the compacting catsup occurs. sent21: the bestness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sparkling satyr happens.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the Indianness occurs.; sent6 -> int2: the Indian does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sparkling satyr does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the censoring happens but the kissing does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the kissing does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__