that the fact that the tramontane does not occur and the silencing rich happens is not false does not hold.
sent1: that the quintupling descent does not occur and the repetitiveness does not occur hold. sent2: the resentfulness does not occur or the humming acronym happens or both. sent3: the fact that the anticyclonicness happens is not incorrect. sent4: that the sidling occurs leads to that the silencing rich occurs. sent5: that the quintupling Ventner does not occur and the crutch occurs yields that the vaulting does not occur. sent6: if the crutch does not occur the fact that the scouring internist does not occur does not hold. sent7: if not the resolution but the Mongolianness occurs the scouring internist does not occur. sent8: the crutch occurs. sent9: if the resolution but not the Mongolian occurs then the scouring mawkishness occurs. sent10: if the cryonicness does not occur then the fact that the anticyclonicness and the sidling happens does not hold. sent11: the Djiboutianness or the scouring mawkishness or both happens. sent12: the scouring internist does not occur if the resolution does not occur and the Mongolian does not occur. sent13: if the vaulting happens then the fact that the tramontane does not occur and the silencing rich happens is incorrect. sent14: the Ravel does not occur and the scouring smoothie does not occur. sent15: if the anticyclonicness happens then the sidling occurs. sent16: the silencing plate occurs. sent17: that the vaulting does not occur prevents the Djiboutian. sent18: the fact that the sidling does not occur is correct if the fact that the anticyclonicness happens and the sidling occurs is incorrect. sent19: that the Djiboutian does not occur and the scouring internist occurs does not hold if the scouring mawkishness occurs. sent20: the resolution does not occur and the Mongolianness does not occur. sent21: that the non-Djiboutianness and/or the scouring mawkishness occurs brings about the non-tramontaneness. sent22: if the resolution but not the Mongolianness happens the scouring internist does not occur. sent23: if that not the quintupling Ventner but the crutch happens does not hold the scouring internist occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the quintupling Ventner does not occur and the crutch occurs is not correct.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the scouring internist happens.; sent12 & sent20 -> int2: the scouring internist does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the quintupling Ventner does not occur but the crutch occurs.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the vaulting does not occur.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the Djiboutian does not occur.; int6 -> int7: either the Djiboutianness does not occur or the scouring mawkishness happens or both.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the tramontane does not occur.; sent15 & sent3 -> int9: the sidling occurs.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the silencing rich happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tramontane does not occur but the silencing rich occurs is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the tramontane does not occur and the silencing rich happens is not false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the quintupling descent does not occur and the repetitiveness does not occur hold. sent2: the resentfulness does not occur or the humming acronym happens or both. sent3: the fact that the anticyclonicness happens is not incorrect. sent4: that the sidling occurs leads to that the silencing rich occurs. sent5: that the quintupling Ventner does not occur and the crutch occurs yields that the vaulting does not occur. sent6: if the crutch does not occur the fact that the scouring internist does not occur does not hold. sent7: if not the resolution but the Mongolianness occurs the scouring internist does not occur. sent8: the crutch occurs. sent9: if the resolution but not the Mongolian occurs then the scouring mawkishness occurs. sent10: if the cryonicness does not occur then the fact that the anticyclonicness and the sidling happens does not hold. sent11: the Djiboutianness or the scouring mawkishness or both happens. sent12: the scouring internist does not occur if the resolution does not occur and the Mongolian does not occur. sent13: if the vaulting happens then the fact that the tramontane does not occur and the silencing rich happens is incorrect. sent14: the Ravel does not occur and the scouring smoothie does not occur. sent15: if the anticyclonicness happens then the sidling occurs. sent16: the silencing plate occurs. sent17: that the vaulting does not occur prevents the Djiboutian. sent18: the fact that the sidling does not occur is correct if the fact that the anticyclonicness happens and the sidling occurs is incorrect. sent19: that the Djiboutian does not occur and the scouring internist occurs does not hold if the scouring mawkishness occurs. sent20: the resolution does not occur and the Mongolianness does not occur. sent21: that the non-Djiboutianness and/or the scouring mawkishness occurs brings about the non-tramontaneness. sent22: if the resolution but not the Mongolianness happens the scouring internist does not occur. sent23: if that not the quintupling Ventner but the crutch happens does not hold the scouring internist occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the quintupling Ventner does not occur and the crutch occurs is not correct.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the scouring internist happens.; sent12 & sent20 -> int2: the scouring internist does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the quintupling Ventner does not occur but the crutch occurs.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the vaulting does not occur.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the Djiboutian does not occur.; int6 -> int7: either the Djiboutianness does not occur or the scouring mawkishness happens or both.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the tramontane does not occur.; sent15 & sent3 -> int9: the sidling occurs.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the silencing rich happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__