the fact that the breakable is isotopic is not wrong.
sent1: the nanny is Neanderthal if something is not a kind of a celebrant but it is a grazing. sent2: the weather does not tire Anhingidae and grazes. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a celebrant. sent4: if the nanny is Neanderthal then the fact that the locksmith does tire Anhingidae but it is not Neanderthal is wrong. sent5: that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae but it is Neanderthal is false. sent6: the locksmith is not a chincapin if that the furrow is a kind of non-puerile thing that is not a kind of a Jakobson does not hold. sent7: the weather grazes. sent8: if the fact that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae and is not Neanderthal does not hold that the breakable is isotopic is not wrong. sent9: the weather is not a celebrant but it does graze. sent10: that the locksmith tires Anhingidae but it is not Neanderthal is not true. sent11: if the locksmith is not a chincapin the fact that the nanny is both an enumeration and not syncretic is not false. sent12: if something does not tire Anhingidae it is not isotopic and it is not Neanderthal. sent13: the weather is not non-isotopic if there is something such that it is not a grazing and it is Neanderthal. sent14: something is a grazing. sent15: if the nanny is Neanderthal the fact that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae and is Neanderthal does not hold. sent16: the fact that that the breakable does not tire Anhingidae is not false if the nanny is both an enumeration and non-syncretic is not wrong. sent17: that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae and is not Neanderthal is not correct if the nanny is Neanderthal. sent18: something is a celebrant and a grazing.
sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a celebrant and it is a kind of a grazing.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the nanny is Neanderthal.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae and is not Neanderthal does not hold.; sent8 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the breakable is not isotopic.
sent12 -> int4: the breakable is both not isotopic and not Neanderthal if it does not tire Anhingidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the breakable is isotopic is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the nanny is Neanderthal if something is not a kind of a celebrant but it is a grazing. sent2: the weather does not tire Anhingidae and grazes. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a celebrant. sent4: if the nanny is Neanderthal then the fact that the locksmith does tire Anhingidae but it is not Neanderthal is wrong. sent5: that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae but it is Neanderthal is false. sent6: the locksmith is not a chincapin if that the furrow is a kind of non-puerile thing that is not a kind of a Jakobson does not hold. sent7: the weather grazes. sent8: if the fact that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae and is not Neanderthal does not hold that the breakable is isotopic is not wrong. sent9: the weather is not a celebrant but it does graze. sent10: that the locksmith tires Anhingidae but it is not Neanderthal is not true. sent11: if the locksmith is not a chincapin the fact that the nanny is both an enumeration and not syncretic is not false. sent12: if something does not tire Anhingidae it is not isotopic and it is not Neanderthal. sent13: the weather is not non-isotopic if there is something such that it is not a grazing and it is Neanderthal. sent14: something is a grazing. sent15: if the nanny is Neanderthal the fact that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae and is Neanderthal does not hold. sent16: the fact that that the breakable does not tire Anhingidae is not false if the nanny is both an enumeration and non-syncretic is not wrong. sent17: that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae and is not Neanderthal is not correct if the nanny is Neanderthal. sent18: something is a celebrant and a grazing. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a celebrant and it is a kind of a grazing.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the nanny is Neanderthal.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: that the locksmith does not tire Anhingidae and is not Neanderthal does not hold.; sent8 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__