the fact that the limekiln does not revenge Iresine and it is not saccadic is not right.
sent1: the fact that the soil does revenge ballplayer but it does not settle verboseness is not right if it is myalgic. sent2: the diatomite does not emblazon cachet if it is a sinapism and/or an advection. sent3: the soil is not a stocktake and it is non-holographic. sent4: that the diatomite is not myalgic is true. sent5: if the diatomite is not a kind of an advection then the fact that the limekiln does not revenge Iresine and is not saccadic is incorrect. sent6: either the diatomite is a sinapism or it is an advection or both. sent7: the fact that the limekiln revenges Iresine and is not saccadic is not right. sent8: if something that emblazons cachet does not revenge soil then the diatomite is not a kind of an advection. sent9: if the diatomite is not an advection that the limekiln does revenge Iresine and is not saccadic is wrong. sent10: the fact that if that something either does not revenge soil or does not revenge ballplayer or both is not right it does not revenge Iresine is right. sent11: that the limekiln does not revenge soil and/or it does not revenge ballplayer is wrong if the diatomite does not emblazon cachet. sent12: if the soil is not a stocktake and it is not holographic then it is myalgic. sent13: The cachet does emblazon soil. sent14: something is not holographic if the fact that it is saccadic and it does not settle verboseness is wrong. sent15: the soil does emblazon cachet. sent16: the soil is not myalgic and it does not settle verboseness if it is not packable.
sent12 & sent3 -> int1: the soil is myalgic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that that the soil does revenge ballplayer and does not settle verboseness is right is wrong.;
the limekiln does not revenge Iresine and it is not saccadic.
sent10 -> int3: the limekiln does not revenge Iresine if the fact that either it does not revenge soil or it does not revenge ballplayer or both does not hold.; sent2 & sent6 -> int4: the diatomite does not emblazon cachet.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: that the limekiln does not revenge soil and/or it does not revenge ballplayer is false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the limekiln does not revenge Iresine.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the limekiln does not revenge Iresine and it is not saccadic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the soil does revenge ballplayer but it does not settle verboseness is not right if it is myalgic. sent2: the diatomite does not emblazon cachet if it is a sinapism and/or an advection. sent3: the soil is not a stocktake and it is non-holographic. sent4: that the diatomite is not myalgic is true. sent5: if the diatomite is not a kind of an advection then the fact that the limekiln does not revenge Iresine and is not saccadic is incorrect. sent6: either the diatomite is a sinapism or it is an advection or both. sent7: the fact that the limekiln revenges Iresine and is not saccadic is not right. sent8: if something that emblazons cachet does not revenge soil then the diatomite is not a kind of an advection. sent9: if the diatomite is not an advection that the limekiln does revenge Iresine and is not saccadic is wrong. sent10: the fact that if that something either does not revenge soil or does not revenge ballplayer or both is not right it does not revenge Iresine is right. sent11: that the limekiln does not revenge soil and/or it does not revenge ballplayer is wrong if the diatomite does not emblazon cachet. sent12: if the soil is not a stocktake and it is not holographic then it is myalgic. sent13: The cachet does emblazon soil. sent14: something is not holographic if the fact that it is saccadic and it does not settle verboseness is wrong. sent15: the soil does emblazon cachet. sent16: the soil is not myalgic and it does not settle verboseness if it is not packable. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent3 -> int1: the soil is myalgic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that that the soil does revenge ballplayer and does not settle verboseness is right is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__