the fact that that the walking Zalophus occurs triggers that the dilation but not the walking northland happens does not hold.
sent1: the intelligentness occurs if that the walking Zalophus does not occur and the intelligentness does not occur is incorrect. sent2: the inconsistentness does not occur if that the suppurativeness and the fossiliferousness happens is not true. sent3: that both the suppurativeness and the fossiliferousness occurs is wrong. sent4: if the walking northland happens that the walking Zalophus does not occur and the intelligentness does not occur does not hold. sent5: the dilation occurs and the re-formation happens if the inconsistentness does not occur. sent6: that the walking northland does not occur is true if that either the transfiguration occurs or the percussion does not occur or both does not hold. sent7: the walking Zalophus does not occur if the transfiguration occurs or the percussion does not occur or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transfiguration happens or the percussion does not occur or both.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the walking Zalophus does not occur is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the walking Zalophus occurs hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the transfiguration happens and/or the percussion does not occur is incorrect.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the walking northland does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int5: the inconsistentness does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the dilation occurs and the re-formation happens.; int6 -> int7: the dilation happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the dilation but not the walking northland occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the intelligentness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the walking Zalophus occurs triggers that the dilation but not the walking northland happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the intelligentness occurs if that the walking Zalophus does not occur and the intelligentness does not occur is incorrect. sent2: the inconsistentness does not occur if that the suppurativeness and the fossiliferousness happens is not true. sent3: that both the suppurativeness and the fossiliferousness occurs is wrong. sent4: if the walking northland happens that the walking Zalophus does not occur and the intelligentness does not occur does not hold. sent5: the dilation occurs and the re-formation happens if the inconsistentness does not occur. sent6: that the walking northland does not occur is true if that either the transfiguration occurs or the percussion does not occur or both does not hold. sent7: the walking Zalophus does not occur if the transfiguration occurs or the percussion does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transfiguration happens or the percussion does not occur or both.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the walking Zalophus does not occur is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the walking Zalophus occurs hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the transfiguration happens and/or the percussion does not occur is incorrect.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the walking northland does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int5: the inconsistentness does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the dilation occurs and the re-formation happens.; int6 -> int7: the dilation happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the dilation but not the walking northland occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__