the ebbing whiskey happens.
sent1: if the snip occurs the ebbing whiskey happens. sent2: that the inviting columbarium does not occur but the trivalentness occurs causes that the manacling truss does not occur. sent3: the algometricness happens if the trivalentness does not occur and the inviting columbarium does not occur. sent4: if the algometricness occurs then the snipping happens. sent5: the arthromericness does not occur. sent6: the leapfrog does not occur and the instrumentalness does not occur if the inviting columbarium occurs. sent7: the fact that the trivalentness does not occur is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inviting columbarium occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the leapfrogging does not occur and the instrumentalness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the leapfrog does not occur.;
the manacling truss does not occur and the manacling Defense does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the ebbing whiskey happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the snip occurs the ebbing whiskey happens. sent2: that the inviting columbarium does not occur but the trivalentness occurs causes that the manacling truss does not occur. sent3: the algometricness happens if the trivalentness does not occur and the inviting columbarium does not occur. sent4: if the algometricness occurs then the snipping happens. sent5: the arthromericness does not occur. sent6: the leapfrog does not occur and the instrumentalness does not occur if the inviting columbarium occurs. sent7: the fact that the trivalentness does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inviting columbarium occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the leapfrogging does not occur and the instrumentalness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the leapfrog does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__