that there is something such that if it hates looted then that it is not a penetrability and is exilic is not true does not hold.
sent1: if something dominates complacency the fact that it is a kind of non-exilic thing that does bathe is not right. sent2: if the Taracahitian hates looted that it is non-scientific thing that is open-source is false. sent3: if the spectrometer hates looted then that it is not a penetrability but exilic is wrong. sent4: there is something such that if it does hate looted it is not a penetrability and it is exilic. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does hate looted is not wrong then the fact that it is a kind of a penetrability and it is exilic is false. sent6: the spectrometer is not a penetrability but exilic if it does hate looted. sent7: the fact that the flab is not angiomatous but it hates looted is not true if it copies pipe. sent8: the fact that the fact that the spectrometer is both a penetrability and exilic is right is wrong if it hates looted. sent9: that something is not a cubitus but it does bathe is not right if it is staccato. sent10: if something is exilic then that it is not polymorphous and it is a strike is not true.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is staccato is true then that it is not a cubitus and it is a bathe is not right.
sent9 -> int1: that the bathymeter is both not a cubitus and a bathe is not right if it is staccato.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it hates looted then that it is not a penetrability and is exilic is not true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something dominates complacency the fact that it is a kind of non-exilic thing that does bathe is not right. sent2: if the Taracahitian hates looted that it is non-scientific thing that is open-source is false. sent3: if the spectrometer hates looted then that it is not a penetrability but exilic is wrong. sent4: there is something such that if it does hate looted it is not a penetrability and it is exilic. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does hate looted is not wrong then the fact that it is a kind of a penetrability and it is exilic is false. sent6: the spectrometer is not a penetrability but exilic if it does hate looted. sent7: the fact that the flab is not angiomatous but it hates looted is not true if it copies pipe. sent8: the fact that the fact that the spectrometer is both a penetrability and exilic is right is wrong if it hates looted. sent9: that something is not a cubitus but it does bathe is not right if it is staccato. sent10: if something is exilic then that it is not polymorphous and it is a strike is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__