the knawel is euphemistic.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-alternate thing that is not a Genevan then the knawel is not euphemistic. sent2: if the wings is not a seaworthiness then it is a kind of a polyelectrolyte. sent3: if the wings is not a leaf-miner and/or is not a seaworthiness it is a polyelectrolyte. sent4: if something that is a bilge is a Genevan the wings is not a polyelectrolyte. sent5: if the Badaga is not a kind of a leaf-miner then the fact that it is a polyelectrolyte and it alternates does not hold. sent6: if the wings is not a bilge the Badaga is not a quickness and does not sparge sparerib. sent7: something bilges. sent8: the Badaga does not alternate. sent9: the wings is not a leaf-miner and/or it is not a seaworthiness. sent10: something is not alternate but a Genevan. sent11: the wings is not a leaf-miner and/or it is a seaworthiness. sent12: that the Badaga bilges is not false. sent13: there is something such that it is not alternate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Badaga is a Genevan.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the Badaga is both a bilge and a Genevan.; int1 -> int2: something is a bilge and it is a Genevan.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the wings is not a kind of a polyelectrolyte.; sent3 & sent9 -> int4: the wings is a polyelectrolyte.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Badaga is not a kind of a Genevan.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Badaga does not alternate and it is not a Genevan.; int7 -> int8: something is non-alternate and not a Genevan.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the knawel is euphemistic.
$hypothesis$ = the knawel is euphemistic. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-alternate thing that is not a Genevan then the knawel is not euphemistic. sent2: if the wings is not a seaworthiness then it is a kind of a polyelectrolyte. sent3: if the wings is not a leaf-miner and/or is not a seaworthiness it is a polyelectrolyte. sent4: if something that is a bilge is a Genevan the wings is not a polyelectrolyte. sent5: if the Badaga is not a kind of a leaf-miner then the fact that it is a polyelectrolyte and it alternates does not hold. sent6: if the wings is not a bilge the Badaga is not a quickness and does not sparge sparerib. sent7: something bilges. sent8: the Badaga does not alternate. sent9: the wings is not a leaf-miner and/or it is not a seaworthiness. sent10: something is not alternate but a Genevan. sent11: the wings is not a leaf-miner and/or it is a seaworthiness. sent12: that the Badaga bilges is not false. sent13: there is something such that it is not alternate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Badaga is a Genevan.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the Badaga is both a bilge and a Genevan.; int1 -> int2: something is a bilge and it is a Genevan.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the wings is not a kind of a polyelectrolyte.; sent3 & sent9 -> int4: the wings is a polyelectrolyte.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Badaga is not a kind of a Genevan.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Badaga does not alternate and it is not a Genevan.; int7 -> int8: something is non-alternate and not a Genevan.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__