the Clay does electroplate and/or it is not a ribaldry.
sent1: the Clay is a ballooning. sent2: something is both a indistinctness and a ballooning if it is not unaware. sent3: the fact that something quietens katamorphism is right. sent4: if something that is a ballooning is a ribaldry then the moccasin is a kind of a indistinctness. sent5: if something does not balloon then the fact that it is an electroplate and/or it is not a ribaldry is false. sent6: that the coelacanth is not unaware is not false if a congruent thing is alpine. sent7: the coelacanth is congruent if the Cancer is unaware. sent8: the coelacanth is unaware if the moccasin is a indistinctness. sent9: the Cancer is alpine. sent10: something is not a ballooning if the fact that it is a indistinctness but not unaware does not hold. sent11: if the moccasin is not non-alpine then the fact that the Clay is a indistinctness but it is not unaware does not hold. sent12: if something is unaware and it is a indistinctness then the coelacanth is not congruent.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Clay is a ribaldry.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Clay is a kind of a ballooning that is a kind of a ribaldry.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does balloon and it is a ribaldry.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the moccasin is a indistinctness.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the coelacanth is unaware.;
the plow either is a ribaldry or does not quieten consomme or both.
sent2 -> int5: if the Clay is aware it is a indistinctness and it balloons.;
$hypothesis$ = the Clay does electroplate and/or it is not a ribaldry. ; $context$ = sent1: the Clay is a ballooning. sent2: something is both a indistinctness and a ballooning if it is not unaware. sent3: the fact that something quietens katamorphism is right. sent4: if something that is a ballooning is a ribaldry then the moccasin is a kind of a indistinctness. sent5: if something does not balloon then the fact that it is an electroplate and/or it is not a ribaldry is false. sent6: that the coelacanth is not unaware is not false if a congruent thing is alpine. sent7: the coelacanth is congruent if the Cancer is unaware. sent8: the coelacanth is unaware if the moccasin is a indistinctness. sent9: the Cancer is alpine. sent10: something is not a ballooning if the fact that it is a indistinctness but not unaware does not hold. sent11: if the moccasin is not non-alpine then the fact that the Clay is a indistinctness but it is not unaware does not hold. sent12: if something is unaware and it is a indistinctness then the coelacanth is not congruent. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Clay is a ribaldry.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Clay is a kind of a ballooning that is a kind of a ribaldry.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does balloon and it is a ribaldry.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the moccasin is a indistinctness.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the coelacanth is unaware.; __UNKNOWN__