the fact that there exists something such that if that it is mensal thing that is a dapple-grey is not true it is not a Malthus is wrong.
sent1: if that the blolly is a kind of mensal a dapple-grey does not hold it is not a Malthus. sent2: if the fact that the detection is a dapple-grey and it is dramaturgic is not right then it is not cardiographic. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is mensal and is a dapple-grey is not right it is a kind of a Malthus. sent4: there exists something such that if it is mensal a dapple-grey that it is not a kind of a Malthus is right. sent5: if the blolly is mensal and it is a dapple-grey it is not a Malthus. sent6: the blolly is not a kind of a Sphenodon if the fact that it is a monotreme and it is a Heliobacter is not correct. sent7: the blolly is not a Malthus if the fact that it skydives and it is a kind of a Boston does not hold. sent8: the blolly is a Malthus if that it is mensal and it is a dapple-grey does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the flour churns gadolinite and is a Malthus does not hold it does not churn awned. sent10: the blolly is not a Malthus if the fact that it is not a dapple-grey is true. sent11: that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a dapple-grey then it is not a kind of a Malthus is right. sent12: if the fact that something bosoms and is mensal does not hold then it is not two-dimensional. sent13: something does not invert if the fact that it is a kind of a fight and it is a kind of a Malthus is false. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not mensal is true then it is not a Malthus. sent15: the blolly is not tactile if the fact that it is heterosexual thing that is a kind of a dapple-grey is not true. sent16: the blolly is not a kind of a wordbook if the fact that it does exalt and is a dacoity is incorrect.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
the tricycle is not two-dimensional if that it is a kind of a bosom and is mensal is not correct.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it is mensal thing that is a dapple-grey is not true it is not a Malthus is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the blolly is a kind of mensal a dapple-grey does not hold it is not a Malthus. sent2: if the fact that the detection is a dapple-grey and it is dramaturgic is not right then it is not cardiographic. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is mensal and is a dapple-grey is not right it is a kind of a Malthus. sent4: there exists something such that if it is mensal a dapple-grey that it is not a kind of a Malthus is right. sent5: if the blolly is mensal and it is a dapple-grey it is not a Malthus. sent6: the blolly is not a kind of a Sphenodon if the fact that it is a monotreme and it is a Heliobacter is not correct. sent7: the blolly is not a Malthus if the fact that it skydives and it is a kind of a Boston does not hold. sent8: the blolly is a Malthus if that it is mensal and it is a dapple-grey does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the flour churns gadolinite and is a Malthus does not hold it does not churn awned. sent10: the blolly is not a Malthus if the fact that it is not a dapple-grey is true. sent11: that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a dapple-grey then it is not a kind of a Malthus is right. sent12: if the fact that something bosoms and is mensal does not hold then it is not two-dimensional. sent13: something does not invert if the fact that it is a kind of a fight and it is a kind of a Malthus is false. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not mensal is true then it is not a Malthus. sent15: the blolly is not tactile if the fact that it is heterosexual thing that is a kind of a dapple-grey is not true. sent16: the blolly is not a kind of a wordbook if the fact that it does exalt and is a dacoity is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__