the fact that that the enzyme is synesthetic and it is sporadic is right is not true.
sent1: the homozygote is not a kind of a Poa but it is sporadic if there is something such that the fact that it is not coloring is true. sent2: the enzyme is not non-synesthetic. sent3: the enzyme is not non-sporadic if it is unsupportive. sent4: the booklet is not a coloring if there is something such that the fact that it does coloring and it is Irish is not correct. sent5: the fact that the enzyme reposes but it is not unsupportive is false. sent6: if something is unsupportive then it is sporadic. sent7: if the fact that something is a repose but it is not unsupportive is incorrect then it is sporadic. sent8: something is a ski if it laps mademoiselle. sent9: that the Episcopalian does lap articulator and it is a repose is wrong. sent10: the enzyme is undatable. sent11: something is a kind of a Poa if the fact that it is a baas and does not intrigue resilience does not hold. sent12: if something is synesthetic the fact that it intrigues cytogeneticist and it is not a repose is wrong. sent13: the enzyme laps preparation. sent14: the fact that the aquatics is a coloring and a Irish is not correct.
sent7 -> int1: if that the enzyme is both a repose and not unsupportive is not correct then it is sporadic.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the enzyme is sporadic hold.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the homozygote does intrigue cytogeneticist and does not repose is false.
sent12 -> int3: the fact that the homozygote does intrigue cytogeneticist but it is not a repose is false if it is synesthetic.; sent14 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it colors and it is a kind of a Irish is not correct.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the booklet does not color.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a coloring.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the homozygote is not a Poa but it is sporadic.; int7 -> int8: the homozygote is sporadic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the enzyme is synesthetic and it is sporadic is right is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the homozygote is not a kind of a Poa but it is sporadic if there is something such that the fact that it is not coloring is true. sent2: the enzyme is not non-synesthetic. sent3: the enzyme is not non-sporadic if it is unsupportive. sent4: the booklet is not a coloring if there is something such that the fact that it does coloring and it is Irish is not correct. sent5: the fact that the enzyme reposes but it is not unsupportive is false. sent6: if something is unsupportive then it is sporadic. sent7: if the fact that something is a repose but it is not unsupportive is incorrect then it is sporadic. sent8: something is a ski if it laps mademoiselle. sent9: that the Episcopalian does lap articulator and it is a repose is wrong. sent10: the enzyme is undatable. sent11: something is a kind of a Poa if the fact that it is a baas and does not intrigue resilience does not hold. sent12: if something is synesthetic the fact that it intrigues cytogeneticist and it is not a repose is wrong. sent13: the enzyme laps preparation. sent14: the fact that the aquatics is a coloring and a Irish is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if that the enzyme is both a repose and not unsupportive is not correct then it is sporadic.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the enzyme is sporadic hold.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__