that the otoscope is a kind of a forint that is not a ascolichen is not correct.
sent1: that something is not sarcastic and/or does not gate otoscope does not hold if the fact that it does gate Medoc is correct. sent2: that the otoscope is sarcastic and is not a kind of a ascolichen is true. sent3: if that something does not gate otoscope is not false that it is a kind of a forint that is not a kind of a ascolichen is not correct. sent4: The appareled primes Adventist. sent5: the Adventist primes appareled. sent6: the Angolese is sarcastic. sent7: if a non-confrontational thing primes appareled the otoscope does not gate otoscope. sent8: that the fact that the otoscope is a forint and it is a ascolichen does not hold is not false if it does not gate otoscope. sent9: the fact that the Angolese does not gate Medoc and is statutory is not correct if there is something such that that it does not equate is not false. sent10: something is a kind of a forint but it is not a ascolichen if it does not prime appareled. sent11: if there exists something such that that it does not gate Medoc and is statutory is not correct the Adventist does gate Medoc. sent12: the Angolese is not sarcastic if the fact that the Adventist primes paging and is not confrontational is not right. sent13: if that the fact that the Medoc does not prime D-layer and does equate is wrong is true the bladder does not equate. sent14: if the Adventist does not prime paging then the Angolese is not sarcastic. sent15: the fact that the Medoc does not prime D-layer and equates does not hold if there is something such that it prime D-layer. sent16: something is both an auctioneer and a Indonesian. sent17: there is something such that it primes D-layer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the Adventist does prime paging but it is not confrontational is not correct is true.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the Angolese is not sarcastic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Adventist primes paging and is not confrontational.; int3 -> int4: the Adventist is not confrontational.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Adventist is not confrontational but it primes appareled.; int5 -> int6: that something is not confrontational and does prime appareled hold.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the otoscope does not gate otoscope.; sent3 -> int8: if the otoscope does not gate otoscope then the fact that it is a forint and it is not a ascolichen is incorrect.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the otoscope is a forint but it is not a ascolichen is correct.
sent10 -> int9: if that the otoscope does not prime appareled is right it is a forint and it is not a ascolichen.; sent1 -> int10: if the Adventist gates Medoc then the fact that it is not sarcastic and/or does not gate otoscope does not hold.; sent17 & sent15 -> int11: the fact that that the Medoc does not prime D-layer and equates is correct is wrong.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the bladder does not equate.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does not equate.; int13 & sent9 -> int14: the fact that the Angolese does not gate Medoc but it is statutory is wrong.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it does not gate Medoc and it is statutory does not hold.; int15 & sent11 -> int16: the Adventist gates Medoc.; int10 & int16 -> int17: that the Adventist is not sarcastic and/or does not gate otoscope is not true.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not sarcastic and/or it does not gate otoscope is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the otoscope is a kind of a forint that is not a ascolichen is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not sarcastic and/or does not gate otoscope does not hold if the fact that it does gate Medoc is correct. sent2: that the otoscope is sarcastic and is not a kind of a ascolichen is true. sent3: if that something does not gate otoscope is not false that it is a kind of a forint that is not a kind of a ascolichen is not correct. sent4: The appareled primes Adventist. sent5: the Adventist primes appareled. sent6: the Angolese is sarcastic. sent7: if a non-confrontational thing primes appareled the otoscope does not gate otoscope. sent8: that the fact that the otoscope is a forint and it is a ascolichen does not hold is not false if it does not gate otoscope. sent9: the fact that the Angolese does not gate Medoc and is statutory is not correct if there is something such that that it does not equate is not false. sent10: something is a kind of a forint but it is not a ascolichen if it does not prime appareled. sent11: if there exists something such that that it does not gate Medoc and is statutory is not correct the Adventist does gate Medoc. sent12: the Angolese is not sarcastic if the fact that the Adventist primes paging and is not confrontational is not right. sent13: if that the fact that the Medoc does not prime D-layer and does equate is wrong is true the bladder does not equate. sent14: if the Adventist does not prime paging then the Angolese is not sarcastic. sent15: the fact that the Medoc does not prime D-layer and equates does not hold if there is something such that it prime D-layer. sent16: something is both an auctioneer and a Indonesian. sent17: there is something such that it primes D-layer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the Adventist does prime paging but it is not confrontational is not correct is true.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the Angolese is not sarcastic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Adventist primes paging and is not confrontational.; int3 -> int4: the Adventist is not confrontational.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Adventist is not confrontational but it primes appareled.; int5 -> int6: that something is not confrontational and does prime appareled hold.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the otoscope does not gate otoscope.; sent3 -> int8: if the otoscope does not gate otoscope then the fact that it is a forint and it is not a ascolichen is incorrect.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__