that something is a stave or it does not compromise motorist or both is correct.
sent1: if the homeopath does camouflage it is unintrusive. sent2: the lignum does compromise trainload. sent3: if something is not a mural and it is not a wistfulness then it does ambush Muncie. sent4: if the homeopath is unintrusive the antlion staves. sent5: the homeopath is not a mural and it is not a wistfulness. sent6: the antlion ambushes Muncie if it is coeliac. sent7: the acoustician is a kind of a wistfulness.
sent3 -> int1: if the homeopath is both not a mural and not a wistfulness then it ambushes Muncie.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the homeopath ambushes Muncie.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is a stave or it does not compromise motorist or both is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the homeopath does camouflage it is unintrusive. sent2: the lignum does compromise trainload. sent3: if something is not a mural and it is not a wistfulness then it does ambush Muncie. sent4: if the homeopath is unintrusive the antlion staves. sent5: the homeopath is not a mural and it is not a wistfulness. sent6: the antlion ambushes Muncie if it is coeliac. sent7: the acoustician is a kind of a wistfulness. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the homeopath is both not a mural and not a wistfulness then it ambushes Muncie.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the homeopath ambushes Muncie.; __UNKNOWN__