the radical does not bask Pinnotheridae.
sent1: if the debacle boxes twenties the fact that the radical does bask Pinnotheridae is true. sent2: the debacle is not a Brahe if the fact that the forget-me-not is non-Darwinian but it is pluralistic is incorrect. sent3: the squelch does not revenge if that it does not smolder and basks dean is wrong. sent4: that the forget-me-not is a kind of a Darwinian and it is pluralistic is incorrect if that something does not deplore blastoma hold. sent5: if something does not deplore blastoma and is not a kind of a Darwinian it does not bask Pinnotheridae. sent6: the rook is not a emasculation if the lido is not a emasculation. sent7: if the fact that the rook smolders and is not blastogenetic is not right the debacle does not smolders. sent8: that the forget-me-not is both Darwinian and not non-pluralistic is not correct. sent9: if something is not a Brahe it boxes twenties. sent10: if something is a kind of a Brahe but it is not pluralistic it does deplore blastoma. sent11: the fact that something is not a kind of a Brahe and it is not pluralistic does not hold if it does not box twenties. sent12: if something does deplore blastoma then it is not a Darwinian. sent13: something that does not revenge boxes twenties and basks Pinnotheridae. sent14: something deplores blastoma. sent15: the lido is not a emasculation. sent16: the fact that if there is something such that it does not deplore blastoma the fact that the forget-me-not is not a kind of a Darwinian and is pluralistic is incorrect is not false. sent17: there is something such that it does not deplore blastoma. sent18: the cornhusker is not a kind of a Darwinian. sent19: if that something does not revenge and basks dean is not true then it does not box twenties. sent20: that something smolders but it is not blastogenetic is not correct if it is not a kind of a emasculation. sent21: the fact that the squelch does not smolder but it basks dean is false. sent22: if the fact that the forget-me-not does not bask Pinnotheridae is right it is Darwinian. sent23: if the debacle does not smolder that the forget-me-not does not revenge and does bask dean is incorrect. sent24: the fact that if the forget-me-not is a kind of a Darwinian the debacle is not a Brahe is true. sent25: if the Rotarian is not a kind of a Darwinian it sops.
sent17 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the forget-me-not is not Darwinian but it is pluralistic does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the debacle is not a Brahe.; sent9 -> int3: if the debacle is not a Brahe it boxes twenties.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the debacle boxes twenties.; int4 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the radical does not bask Pinnotheridae.
sent5 -> int5: that the radical does not bask Pinnotheridae hold if it does not deplore blastoma and is not a Darwinian.; sent11 -> int6: if the forget-me-not does not box twenties that it is not a Brahe and it is not pluralistic is false.; sent19 -> int7: that the forget-me-not does not box twenties is right if the fact that it does not revenge and it basks dean is not right.; sent20 -> int8: that the rook does smolder and is not blastogenetic is not right if it is not a kind of a emasculation.; sent6 & sent15 -> int9: the rook is not a emasculation.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the rook smolders and is not blastogenetic is not right.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the debacle does not smolder.; sent23 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the forget-me-not does not revenge but it does bask dean is not true.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the forget-me-not does not box twenties.; int6 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the forget-me-not is not a Brahe and is not pluralistic is incorrect.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Brahe but non-pluralistic is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the radical does not bask Pinnotheridae. ; $context$ = sent1: if the debacle boxes twenties the fact that the radical does bask Pinnotheridae is true. sent2: the debacle is not a Brahe if the fact that the forget-me-not is non-Darwinian but it is pluralistic is incorrect. sent3: the squelch does not revenge if that it does not smolder and basks dean is wrong. sent4: that the forget-me-not is a kind of a Darwinian and it is pluralistic is incorrect if that something does not deplore blastoma hold. sent5: if something does not deplore blastoma and is not a kind of a Darwinian it does not bask Pinnotheridae. sent6: the rook is not a emasculation if the lido is not a emasculation. sent7: if the fact that the rook smolders and is not blastogenetic is not right the debacle does not smolders. sent8: that the forget-me-not is both Darwinian and not non-pluralistic is not correct. sent9: if something is not a Brahe it boxes twenties. sent10: if something is a kind of a Brahe but it is not pluralistic it does deplore blastoma. sent11: the fact that something is not a kind of a Brahe and it is not pluralistic does not hold if it does not box twenties. sent12: if something does deplore blastoma then it is not a Darwinian. sent13: something that does not revenge boxes twenties and basks Pinnotheridae. sent14: something deplores blastoma. sent15: the lido is not a emasculation. sent16: the fact that if there is something such that it does not deplore blastoma the fact that the forget-me-not is not a kind of a Darwinian and is pluralistic is incorrect is not false. sent17: there is something such that it does not deplore blastoma. sent18: the cornhusker is not a kind of a Darwinian. sent19: if that something does not revenge and basks dean is not true then it does not box twenties. sent20: that something smolders but it is not blastogenetic is not correct if it is not a kind of a emasculation. sent21: the fact that the squelch does not smolder but it basks dean is false. sent22: if the fact that the forget-me-not does not bask Pinnotheridae is right it is Darwinian. sent23: if the debacle does not smolder that the forget-me-not does not revenge and does bask dean is incorrect. sent24: the fact that if the forget-me-not is a kind of a Darwinian the debacle is not a Brahe is true. sent25: if the Rotarian is not a kind of a Darwinian it sops. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the forget-me-not is not Darwinian but it is pluralistic does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the debacle is not a Brahe.; sent9 -> int3: if the debacle is not a Brahe it boxes twenties.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the debacle boxes twenties.; int4 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__