the cloudiness occurs or the vulgarization occurs or both.
sent1: not the condemnation but the trivalentness happens if the checkmate occurs. sent2: the informalness does not occur if the fact that the repoting Torah but not the peroration happens is wrong. sent3: the fact that the regressing occurs but the popping does not occur does not hold if the fact that the squishing Gur does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the cloudiness does not occur then that the asceticism happens and the staging occurs is incorrect. sent5: if the repoting pacesetter does not occur then the fact that the zooming does not occur and the repoting Smyrnium happens is incorrect. sent6: the trivalentness occurs if the checkmate occurs. sent7: the fact that not the zoom but the home happens is false. sent8: if that the asceticism but not the staging happens is not true then the blockage does not occur. sent9: the checkmate occurs. sent10: the trivalentness occurs. sent11: the fact that the participation happens but the upholding Reverend does not occur is incorrect. sent12: if that the circumvallating ciliate but not the bigamy happens is not true the choiring does not occur. sent13: if the staging occurs then the blockage does not occur. sent14: the fact that the asceticism occurs and the staging happens is wrong. sent15: the fact that the seasonableness does not occur but the demoralization occurs is not true. sent16: not the rubriccing but the benzoicness happens. sent17: that the unsupportiveness occurs and the circumvallating velociraptor does not occur is not right. sent18: that the condemnation does not occur but the trivalentness occurs is not true if the blockage does not occur. sent19: the fact that the fact that the asceticism but not the staging occurs is not wrong is not true if the cloudiness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cloudiness does not occur.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the asceticism but not the staging occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the blockage does not occur.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: that not the condemnation but the trivalentness happens is wrong.; sent1 & sent9 -> int4: not the condemnation but the trivalentness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cloudiness occurs.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cloudiness or the vulgarization or both happens is wrong.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the cloudiness occurs or the vulgarization occurs or both. ; $context$ = sent1: not the condemnation but the trivalentness happens if the checkmate occurs. sent2: the informalness does not occur if the fact that the repoting Torah but not the peroration happens is wrong. sent3: the fact that the regressing occurs but the popping does not occur does not hold if the fact that the squishing Gur does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the cloudiness does not occur then that the asceticism happens and the staging occurs is incorrect. sent5: if the repoting pacesetter does not occur then the fact that the zooming does not occur and the repoting Smyrnium happens is incorrect. sent6: the trivalentness occurs if the checkmate occurs. sent7: the fact that not the zoom but the home happens is false. sent8: if that the asceticism but not the staging happens is not true then the blockage does not occur. sent9: the checkmate occurs. sent10: the trivalentness occurs. sent11: the fact that the participation happens but the upholding Reverend does not occur is incorrect. sent12: if that the circumvallating ciliate but not the bigamy happens is not true the choiring does not occur. sent13: if the staging occurs then the blockage does not occur. sent14: the fact that the asceticism occurs and the staging happens is wrong. sent15: the fact that the seasonableness does not occur but the demoralization occurs is not true. sent16: not the rubriccing but the benzoicness happens. sent17: that the unsupportiveness occurs and the circumvallating velociraptor does not occur is not right. sent18: that the condemnation does not occur but the trivalentness occurs is not true if the blockage does not occur. sent19: the fact that the fact that the asceticism but not the staging occurs is not wrong is not true if the cloudiness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cloudiness does not occur.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the asceticism but not the staging occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the blockage does not occur.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: that not the condemnation but the trivalentness happens is wrong.; sent1 & sent9 -> int4: not the condemnation but the trivalentness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cloudiness occurs.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__