the fact that the fact that the schoolmaster is a Wilder but it does not urticate hobbyism does not hold if the tusk is not a knuckle is not correct.
sent1: the schoolmaster is a Wilder. sent2: the tusk does not urticate hobbyism. sent3: the fact that the schoolmaster does not urticate hobbyism is correct. sent4: the fact that the schoolmaster is a kind of a Wilder and does urticate hobbyism is not right if the tusk is not a kind of a knuckle. sent5: if the schoolmaster is a Wilder that urticates hobbyism that the scabious is a conversation hold. sent6: if the tusk is not a knuckle the schoolmaster is a Wilder and does not urticate hobbyism. sent7: the tusk is a conversation. sent8: the scabious is a Guyanese. sent9: if the schoolmaster is a Wilder and does not urticate hobbyism the scabious is a conversation. sent10: the tusk is a Wilder. sent11: the fact that the schoolmaster is a knuckle and does not urticate hobbyism is incorrect. sent12: that the schoolmaster is a knuckle but it does not urticate hobbyism is wrong if the fact that the tusk is not a Wilder is not false. sent13: the fact that the scabious is a conversation and does not urticate hobbyism is not true. sent14: the schoolmaster is a kind of a conversation if the scabious urticates hobbyism and is not a Wilder. sent15: the tenpin is not a conversation. sent16: the schoolmaster is a Wilder and is not a knuckle. sent17: the tusk is a conversation but it does not mound Agrobacterium. sent18: the schoolmaster is a conversation that does not urticate hobbyism. sent19: that the schoolmaster is a Wilder and it does urticate hobbyism is not correct. sent20: if the scabious is a conversation the tusk is a kind of a knuckle. sent21: the schoolmaster is a conversation. sent22: the fireclay does knuckle.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schoolmaster is a Wilder but it does not urticate hobbyism.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the scabious is a conversation.; sent20 & int1 -> int2: the tusk is a kind of a knuckle.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the tusk does not knuckle is not false.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the schoolmaster is a kind of a Wilder but it does not urticate hobbyism is not true.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the schoolmaster is a Wilder but it does not urticate hobbyism does not hold if the tusk is not a knuckle is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the schoolmaster is a Wilder. sent2: the tusk does not urticate hobbyism. sent3: the fact that the schoolmaster does not urticate hobbyism is correct. sent4: the fact that the schoolmaster is a kind of a Wilder and does urticate hobbyism is not right if the tusk is not a kind of a knuckle. sent5: if the schoolmaster is a Wilder that urticates hobbyism that the scabious is a conversation hold. sent6: if the tusk is not a knuckle the schoolmaster is a Wilder and does not urticate hobbyism. sent7: the tusk is a conversation. sent8: the scabious is a Guyanese. sent9: if the schoolmaster is a Wilder and does not urticate hobbyism the scabious is a conversation. sent10: the tusk is a Wilder. sent11: the fact that the schoolmaster is a knuckle and does not urticate hobbyism is incorrect. sent12: that the schoolmaster is a knuckle but it does not urticate hobbyism is wrong if the fact that the tusk is not a Wilder is not false. sent13: the fact that the scabious is a conversation and does not urticate hobbyism is not true. sent14: the schoolmaster is a kind of a conversation if the scabious urticates hobbyism and is not a Wilder. sent15: the tenpin is not a conversation. sent16: the schoolmaster is a Wilder and is not a knuckle. sent17: the tusk is a conversation but it does not mound Agrobacterium. sent18: the schoolmaster is a conversation that does not urticate hobbyism. sent19: that the schoolmaster is a Wilder and it does urticate hobbyism is not correct. sent20: if the scabious is a conversation the tusk is a kind of a knuckle. sent21: the schoolmaster is a conversation. sent22: the fireclay does knuckle. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schoolmaster is a Wilder but it does not urticate hobbyism.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the scabious is a conversation.; sent20 & int1 -> int2: the tusk is a kind of a knuckle.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the tusk does not knuckle is not false.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the schoolmaster is a kind of a Wilder but it does not urticate hobbyism is not true.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__