the stepson is not Ionic.
sent1: if the lignum is not mental then it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent2: the psocid confederates. sent3: the quiver is not an eccentricity. sent4: if something that is not an eccentricity does personify lover it is catabolic. sent5: if the etymologist does not confederate then that the psocid does not jumble gasbag and it is not Ionic is incorrect. sent6: the psocid does not jumble gasbag if the quiver does vitrify and personifies lover. sent7: the psocid is a kind of an equatorial. sent8: something vitrifies if that it does not jumble gasbag and it is non-Ionic is not correct. sent9: the psocid does jumble gasbag if it confederates. sent10: if that the quiver does not personify lover is true then the etymologist is not catabolic and personify lover. sent11: if there is something such that it does vitrify then the gasbag is not an eccentricity but it does personify lover. sent12: the fact that the stepson is not Ionic is right if there is something such that it is not catabolic and personifies lover.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quiver does personify lover.; sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the psocid does jumble gasbag.;
that the gasbag is not catabolic is false.
sent4 -> int2: if the gasbag is not a kind of an eccentricity but it personifies lover then it is catabolic.; sent8 -> int3: if the fact that the psocid does not jumble gasbag and is not Ionic does not hold it does vitrify.;
$hypothesis$ = the stepson is not Ionic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lignum is not mental then it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent2: the psocid confederates. sent3: the quiver is not an eccentricity. sent4: if something that is not an eccentricity does personify lover it is catabolic. sent5: if the etymologist does not confederate then that the psocid does not jumble gasbag and it is not Ionic is incorrect. sent6: the psocid does not jumble gasbag if the quiver does vitrify and personifies lover. sent7: the psocid is a kind of an equatorial. sent8: something vitrifies if that it does not jumble gasbag and it is non-Ionic is not correct. sent9: the psocid does jumble gasbag if it confederates. sent10: if that the quiver does not personify lover is true then the etymologist is not catabolic and personify lover. sent11: if there is something such that it does vitrify then the gasbag is not an eccentricity but it does personify lover. sent12: the fact that the stepson is not Ionic is right if there is something such that it is not catabolic and personifies lover. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quiver does personify lover.; sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the psocid does jumble gasbag.; __UNKNOWN__