the meson is an accreditation.
sent1: if the brambling is not a Hudson and it is not choral the Benjamin is not incommensurate. sent2: the Cornish is not hydrostatic but it is incommensurate if the Benjamin is not incommensurate. sent3: the brambling is not choral. sent4: the meson is not a kind of an accreditation if the Cornish is non-hydrostatic thing that is incommensurate. sent5: the Cornish is incommensurate. sent6: if something is not hydrostatic then it is a kind of an accreditation and it is incommensurate. sent7: the brambling is not a Hudson and it is not choral. sent8: the Benjamin is not incommensurate if the brambling is not a Hudson but it is choral.
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the Benjamin is not incommensurate.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the Cornish is not hydrostatic but it is incommensurate.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the meson is an accreditation.
sent6 -> int3: if that the meson is not hydrostatic is not wrong then it is a kind of an accreditation and it is incommensurate.;
$hypothesis$ = the meson is an accreditation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the brambling is not a Hudson and it is not choral the Benjamin is not incommensurate. sent2: the Cornish is not hydrostatic but it is incommensurate if the Benjamin is not incommensurate. sent3: the brambling is not choral. sent4: the meson is not a kind of an accreditation if the Cornish is non-hydrostatic thing that is incommensurate. sent5: the Cornish is incommensurate. sent6: if something is not hydrostatic then it is a kind of an accreditation and it is incommensurate. sent7: the brambling is not a Hudson and it is not choral. sent8: the Benjamin is not incommensurate if the brambling is not a Hudson but it is choral. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the Benjamin is not incommensurate.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the Cornish is not hydrostatic but it is incommensurate.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__