that there exists something such that if it is a kind of centralist thing that does not service hash then it is not abactinal is incorrect.
sent1: the Saracen is not a WHO if it is a Gossypium that is not abactinal. sent2: if a malignant thing is not interfacial it does not scent pinger. sent3: if the Saracen is centralist but it does not service hash it is not abactinal. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a NATO and it is not tolerant it does not storm. sent5: there is something such that if it is centralist thing that services hash then it is not abactinal. sent6: if the Saracen is centralist but it does not service hash then it is abactinal. sent7: if the ladyfinger is both heavenly and not a storm then it does not service hash. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a Quiche and is not topical it does not run overseer. sent9: there is something such that if it is centralist and does not service hash then it is abactinal. sent10: that the Saracen does not service ladyfinger if the Saracen is cyclothymic and non-hateful is correct. sent11: if the Saracen is centralist and does service hash then it is not abactinal. sent12: if the hash is a kind of abactinal thing that is not glacial then it is not criminological.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that there exists something such that if it is malignant and is not interfacial that it does not scent pinger is not wrong is not incorrect.
sent2 -> int1: if the gorse is malignant and not interfacial it does not scent pinger.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of centralist thing that does not service hash then it is not abactinal is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Saracen is not a WHO if it is a Gossypium that is not abactinal. sent2: if a malignant thing is not interfacial it does not scent pinger. sent3: if the Saracen is centralist but it does not service hash it is not abactinal. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a NATO and it is not tolerant it does not storm. sent5: there is something such that if it is centralist thing that services hash then it is not abactinal. sent6: if the Saracen is centralist but it does not service hash then it is abactinal. sent7: if the ladyfinger is both heavenly and not a storm then it does not service hash. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a Quiche and is not topical it does not run overseer. sent9: there is something such that if it is centralist and does not service hash then it is abactinal. sent10: that the Saracen does not service ladyfinger if the Saracen is cyclothymic and non-hateful is correct. sent11: if the Saracen is centralist and does service hash then it is not abactinal. sent12: if the hash is a kind of abactinal thing that is not glacial then it is not criminological. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__