the fact that the impersonator is a debridement and it is a cenotaph is not right.
sent1: if something does not guard fur-piece it does not clamor. sent2: something is not aground if it is not a Gael. sent3: that something is not a clamor is not false. sent4: something is not polyphonic if that it is a jag and is not a pandiculation hold. sent5: that the temazepam is not the debridement if the temazepam is both aground and not a feud is not wrong. sent6: if the temazepam does not subside temazepam the harrier is equatorial a feud. sent7: if the fact that the temazepam is a guardrail but it is not a materialization hold then that it does not dwarf Cimabue is not incorrect. sent8: if the harrier does guard fur-piece and it is a kind of a Gael the temazepam does not guard fur-piece. sent9: there is something such that it is not bacillar. sent10: the harrier does not subside temazepam if it is a debridement and it is a feud. sent11: if the temazepam is not a clamor the Stilton is both not a mediacy and a debridement. sent12: if something does not guard fur-piece but it is a kind of a guardrail it is not a Gael. sent13: that the temazepam is an equatorial and it guards fur-piece does not hold. sent14: the harrier is a cenotaph. sent15: if something that does not guard fur-piece is not a kind of a guardrail then that it is not a Gael is not false. sent16: the Wesleyan is not a kind of a spoilsport and it is not a mediacy. sent17: that the impersonator is a debridement and it is a cenotaph is incorrect if the harrier is not a debridement. sent18: if something is not a clamor the temazepam does not guard fur-piece and it is not a guardrail. sent19: if the fact that something does abscise but it is not splintery is right it does not idealize mangel-wurzel. sent20: something is not a kind of a debridement if it is equatorial a feud.
sent3 & sent18 -> int1: the temazepam does not guard fur-piece and it is not a guardrail.; sent15 -> int2: that the temazepam is not a kind of the Gael if the temazepam does not guard fur-piece and it is not a guardrail is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the temazepam is not a Gael.; sent2 -> int4: the temazepam is not aground if it is not a Gael.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the temazepam is not aground.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the temazepam does subside temazepam.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the temazepam is not aground but it does subside temazepam.; sent20 -> int7: the harrier is not a debridement if it is a kind of an equatorial and it is a feud.;
the Stilton is not a mediacy and is a debridement.
sent1 -> int8: if the temazepam does not guard fur-piece then it does not clamor.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the impersonator is a debridement and it is a cenotaph is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not guard fur-piece it does not clamor. sent2: something is not aground if it is not a Gael. sent3: that something is not a clamor is not false. sent4: something is not polyphonic if that it is a jag and is not a pandiculation hold. sent5: that the temazepam is not the debridement if the temazepam is both aground and not a feud is not wrong. sent6: if the temazepam does not subside temazepam the harrier is equatorial a feud. sent7: if the fact that the temazepam is a guardrail but it is not a materialization hold then that it does not dwarf Cimabue is not incorrect. sent8: if the harrier does guard fur-piece and it is a kind of a Gael the temazepam does not guard fur-piece. sent9: there is something such that it is not bacillar. sent10: the harrier does not subside temazepam if it is a debridement and it is a feud. sent11: if the temazepam is not a clamor the Stilton is both not a mediacy and a debridement. sent12: if something does not guard fur-piece but it is a kind of a guardrail it is not a Gael. sent13: that the temazepam is an equatorial and it guards fur-piece does not hold. sent14: the harrier is a cenotaph. sent15: if something that does not guard fur-piece is not a kind of a guardrail then that it is not a Gael is not false. sent16: the Wesleyan is not a kind of a spoilsport and it is not a mediacy. sent17: that the impersonator is a debridement and it is a cenotaph is incorrect if the harrier is not a debridement. sent18: if something is not a clamor the temazepam does not guard fur-piece and it is not a guardrail. sent19: if the fact that something does abscise but it is not splintery is right it does not idealize mangel-wurzel. sent20: something is not a kind of a debridement if it is equatorial a feud. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent18 -> int1: the temazepam does not guard fur-piece and it is not a guardrail.; sent15 -> int2: that the temazepam is not a kind of the Gael if the temazepam does not guard fur-piece and it is not a guardrail is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the temazepam is not a Gael.; sent2 -> int4: the temazepam is not aground if it is not a Gael.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the temazepam is not aground.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the temazepam does subside temazepam.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the temazepam is not aground but it does subside temazepam.; sent20 -> int7: the harrier is not a debridement if it is a kind of an equatorial and it is a feud.; __UNKNOWN__