the salving sabbat occurs.
sent1: if the shlepping does not occur the attendant occurs. sent2: that the technophilicness happens is brought about by that the weedlessness does not occur. sent3: the mercy happens. sent4: that the Dalmatianness does not occur is prevented by the non-chaffiness. sent5: the fact that the fact that the drop or the non-uptownness or both happens hold is incorrect. sent6: that the fact that the fact that the defraying demiurge happens or the salving stainability does not occur or both is right is not true is not false. sent7: the residentialness occurs. sent8: if the fact that the dropping does not occur but the uptownness occurs does not hold then the salving sabbat does not occur. sent9: that both the defraying caiman and the drop occurs is triggered by the non-uptownness. sent10: if the fact that the clocking glitter happens is correct then the salving sabbat occurs. sent11: that the acquittal happens triggers that the clocking glitter occurs. sent12: that the airstream does not occur hold. sent13: the predicting happens. sent14: the salving fortuneteller happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drop occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the drop happens or the uptown does not occur or both.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the drop does not occur.;
the salving sabbat does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the salving sabbat occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shlepping does not occur the attendant occurs. sent2: that the technophilicness happens is brought about by that the weedlessness does not occur. sent3: the mercy happens. sent4: that the Dalmatianness does not occur is prevented by the non-chaffiness. sent5: the fact that the fact that the drop or the non-uptownness or both happens hold is incorrect. sent6: that the fact that the fact that the defraying demiurge happens or the salving stainability does not occur or both is right is not true is not false. sent7: the residentialness occurs. sent8: if the fact that the dropping does not occur but the uptownness occurs does not hold then the salving sabbat does not occur. sent9: that both the defraying caiman and the drop occurs is triggered by the non-uptownness. sent10: if the fact that the clocking glitter happens is correct then the salving sabbat occurs. sent11: that the acquittal happens triggers that the clocking glitter occurs. sent12: that the airstream does not occur hold. sent13: the predicting happens. sent14: the salving fortuneteller happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drop occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the drop happens or the uptown does not occur or both.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the drop does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__