if that the tweet does not occur hold the maxillodentalness occurs and the reddening duckboard occurs.
sent1: the tobogganing happens. sent2: the declining and the angling bitterness happens. sent3: that the monatomicness and the non-caduceanness occurs is not true. sent4: the fact that the cuttingness occurs is correct. sent5: that the maxillodentalness occurs and/or the tweet is triggered by that the reddening duckboard does not occur. sent6: the fact that the tweeting does not occur and the maxillodentalness does not occur does not hold. sent7: that both the reddening Schumann and the reddening duckboard occurs is caused by that the reddening ram does not occur. sent8: the reddening ram does not occur and the reddening Schumann does not occur if the angling actinopod does not occur. sent9: the reddening duckboard does not occur if the reddening ram does not occur and the reddening Schumann does not occur. sent10: the blaze does not occur. sent11: that the getting suslik occurs but the manipulation does not occur is not true. sent12: if either the inquest happens or the angling INR does not occur or both the angling actinopod does not occur. sent13: the reconcilableness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tweeting does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the maxillodentalness does not occur.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the tweeting does not occur and the maxillodentalness does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the maxillodentalness occurs.;
the angling inviting happens.
$hypothesis$ = if that the tweet does not occur hold the maxillodentalness occurs and the reddening duckboard occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the tobogganing happens. sent2: the declining and the angling bitterness happens. sent3: that the monatomicness and the non-caduceanness occurs is not true. sent4: the fact that the cuttingness occurs is correct. sent5: that the maxillodentalness occurs and/or the tweet is triggered by that the reddening duckboard does not occur. sent6: the fact that the tweeting does not occur and the maxillodentalness does not occur does not hold. sent7: that both the reddening Schumann and the reddening duckboard occurs is caused by that the reddening ram does not occur. sent8: the reddening ram does not occur and the reddening Schumann does not occur if the angling actinopod does not occur. sent9: the reddening duckboard does not occur if the reddening ram does not occur and the reddening Schumann does not occur. sent10: the blaze does not occur. sent11: that the getting suslik occurs but the manipulation does not occur is not true. sent12: if either the inquest happens or the angling INR does not occur or both the angling actinopod does not occur. sent13: the reconcilableness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tweeting does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the maxillodentalness does not occur.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the tweeting does not occur and the maxillodentalness does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the maxillodentalness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__