the extension does not occur.
sent1: the smashing cracking does not occur and the miscarriage does not occur if the atavism happens. sent2: if the fact that the meaning happens and the mopping does not occur is not correct then the fact that the phosphorescence does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the receptiveness happens if the Rembrandtesqueness does not occur. sent4: the ratlikeness does not occur. sent5: the iliacness does not occur if that the amauroticness but not the incarnation occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the iliacness does not occur the reigning Gent occurs. sent7: that the miscarriage does not occur yields that the reigning Gent does not occur and the iliacness does not occur. sent8: the placation does not occur if the fact that that the inactivation but not the vengeance happens is incorrect is true. sent9: the extension does not occur if the reigning Gent does not occur and the iliacness does not occur. sent10: the ancestralness occurs. sent11: the rotogravure happens. sent12: that the roping does not occur is prevented by that the Aramaic does not occur. sent13: that the quadrupedalness but not the abducent happens is false. sent14: if the amauroticness does not occur then the iliacness does not occur. sent15: the refutation does not occur if that both the reigning breadstick and the non-navigationalness occurs is incorrect. sent16: that the window-shoping does not occur is prevented by the smashing Dipper. sent17: that the amauroticness happens but the incarnation does not occur is false. sent18: the extension occurs if the reigning Gent occurs. sent19: if that the reigning rumination but not the adoption occurs is not right then the staling anthropolatry does not occur.
sent5 & sent17 -> int1: the iliacness does not occur.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the reigning Gent happens.; sent18 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the extension does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the extension does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the smashing cracking does not occur and the miscarriage does not occur if the atavism happens. sent2: if the fact that the meaning happens and the mopping does not occur is not correct then the fact that the phosphorescence does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the receptiveness happens if the Rembrandtesqueness does not occur. sent4: the ratlikeness does not occur. sent5: the iliacness does not occur if that the amauroticness but not the incarnation occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the iliacness does not occur the reigning Gent occurs. sent7: that the miscarriage does not occur yields that the reigning Gent does not occur and the iliacness does not occur. sent8: the placation does not occur if the fact that that the inactivation but not the vengeance happens is incorrect is true. sent9: the extension does not occur if the reigning Gent does not occur and the iliacness does not occur. sent10: the ancestralness occurs. sent11: the rotogravure happens. sent12: that the roping does not occur is prevented by that the Aramaic does not occur. sent13: that the quadrupedalness but not the abducent happens is false. sent14: if the amauroticness does not occur then the iliacness does not occur. sent15: the refutation does not occur if that both the reigning breadstick and the non-navigationalness occurs is incorrect. sent16: that the window-shoping does not occur is prevented by the smashing Dipper. sent17: that the amauroticness happens but the incarnation does not occur is false. sent18: the extension occurs if the reigning Gent occurs. sent19: if that the reigning rumination but not the adoption occurs is not right then the staling anthropolatry does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent17 -> int1: the iliacness does not occur.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the reigning Gent happens.; sent18 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__