that the lecanopteris is a fuller but it does not wail pole is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the campstool does not demagnetize comprehensive and/or is not a tellurian is true then the captive is a geologist. sent2: the fact that the campstool does not suckle sycamore hold if the captive does not suckle embezzler and does not suckle sycamore. sent3: the lecanopteris does demagnetize comprehensive if the bisque is a kind of a geologist. sent4: the bisque is not a geologist if there exists something such that that that it is a fuller and it demagnetizes comprehensive is not incorrect does not hold. sent5: if that the campstool is naval but it does not maintain Ruth does not hold then it does not maintain cochineal. sent6: if something is not a kind of a fuller it is naval and it suckles sycamore. sent7: that the campstool does maintain Ruth but it does not demagnetize comprehensive is false. sent8: that something is naval but it does not maintain Ruth is incorrect if it does not suckle sycamore. sent9: if the bisque does not demagnetize comprehensive then the campstool does not demagnetize comprehensive or it is not a kind of a tellurian or both. sent10: the cyborg is a chart. sent11: something that does demagnetize comprehensive is a fuller that does not wail pole. sent12: if either the captive is naval or it does not maintain cochineal or both then the cyborg is not a kind of a fuller. sent13: if the cyborg is not a kind of a fuller then the fact that that the lecanopteris is a fuller and does not wail pole is wrong is correct. sent14: something maintains Ruth and is a sir if it does not suckle sycamore. sent15: the bisque leases. sent16: if the cyborg does chart it does not freight and it is Alpine. sent17: the bisque does not demagnetize comprehensive if there is something such that that it is a lease and a chew is not right. sent18: something is not Alpine. sent19: there is something such that that it does lease and it chews is not correct. sent20: the cyborg is a fuller and/or does not demagnetize comprehensive. sent21: if something is both a geologist and a sir then it does not maintain cochineal. sent22: if there are non-Alpine things then the captive does not suckle sycamore. sent23: the bisque is naval and/or it does not demagnetize comprehensive. sent24: the bisque does demagnetize comprehensive and/or it does not suckle sycamore.
sent19 & sent17 -> int1: the bisque does not demagnetize comprehensive.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the campstool does not demagnetize comprehensive and/or is not a tellurian.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the captive is a geologist.; sent14 -> int4: if the captive does not suckle sycamore it does maintain Ruth and is a sir.; sent18 & sent22 -> int5: the fact that the captive does not suckle sycamore is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the captive maintains Ruth and it is a sir.; int6 -> int7: the captive is a kind of a sir.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the captive is a geologist and it is a kind of a sir.; sent21 -> int9: if the captive is a geologist and it is a sir then it does not maintain cochineal.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the captive does not maintain cochineal.; int10 -> int11: the captive is naval and/or it does not maintain cochineal.; int11 & sent12 -> int12: the cyborg is not a fuller.; int12 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the lecanopteris is a fuller but it does not wail pole.
sent11 -> int13: the lecanopteris is a fuller and does not wail pole if it does demagnetize comprehensive.; sent8 -> int14: that the campstool is naval and does not maintain Ruth is not correct if it does not suckle sycamore.; sent16 & sent10 -> int15: the cyborg is not a kind of a freight but it is Alpine.; int15 -> int16: the cyborg is Alpine.;
$hypothesis$ = that the lecanopteris is a fuller but it does not wail pole is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the campstool does not demagnetize comprehensive and/or is not a tellurian is true then the captive is a geologist. sent2: the fact that the campstool does not suckle sycamore hold if the captive does not suckle embezzler and does not suckle sycamore. sent3: the lecanopteris does demagnetize comprehensive if the bisque is a kind of a geologist. sent4: the bisque is not a geologist if there exists something such that that that it is a fuller and it demagnetizes comprehensive is not incorrect does not hold. sent5: if that the campstool is naval but it does not maintain Ruth does not hold then it does not maintain cochineal. sent6: if something is not a kind of a fuller it is naval and it suckles sycamore. sent7: that the campstool does maintain Ruth but it does not demagnetize comprehensive is false. sent8: that something is naval but it does not maintain Ruth is incorrect if it does not suckle sycamore. sent9: if the bisque does not demagnetize comprehensive then the campstool does not demagnetize comprehensive or it is not a kind of a tellurian or both. sent10: the cyborg is a chart. sent11: something that does demagnetize comprehensive is a fuller that does not wail pole. sent12: if either the captive is naval or it does not maintain cochineal or both then the cyborg is not a kind of a fuller. sent13: if the cyborg is not a kind of a fuller then the fact that that the lecanopteris is a fuller and does not wail pole is wrong is correct. sent14: something maintains Ruth and is a sir if it does not suckle sycamore. sent15: the bisque leases. sent16: if the cyborg does chart it does not freight and it is Alpine. sent17: the bisque does not demagnetize comprehensive if there is something such that that it is a lease and a chew is not right. sent18: something is not Alpine. sent19: there is something such that that it does lease and it chews is not correct. sent20: the cyborg is a fuller and/or does not demagnetize comprehensive. sent21: if something is both a geologist and a sir then it does not maintain cochineal. sent22: if there are non-Alpine things then the captive does not suckle sycamore. sent23: the bisque is naval and/or it does not demagnetize comprehensive. sent24: the bisque does demagnetize comprehensive and/or it does not suckle sycamore. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent17 -> int1: the bisque does not demagnetize comprehensive.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the campstool does not demagnetize comprehensive and/or is not a tellurian.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the captive is a geologist.; sent14 -> int4: if the captive does not suckle sycamore it does maintain Ruth and is a sir.; sent18 & sent22 -> int5: the fact that the captive does not suckle sycamore is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the captive maintains Ruth and it is a sir.; int6 -> int7: the captive is a kind of a sir.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the captive is a geologist and it is a kind of a sir.; sent21 -> int9: if the captive is a geologist and it is a sir then it does not maintain cochineal.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the captive does not maintain cochineal.; int10 -> int11: the captive is naval and/or it does not maintain cochineal.; int11 & sent12 -> int12: the cyborg is not a fuller.; int12 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__