the fact that the mire is a kind of a Latrobe and it is a doctor is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the Galilean is not holographic but it is an ouster is false if there exists something such that it is not an outfitted. sent2: there exists something such that it is not unbreakable. sent3: something is not an outfitted. sent4: the fizgig is non-cybernetic if that the Galilean is a kind of non-holographic thing that is not a kind of an ouster is not true. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a Hedysarum then that the fizgig is not an outfitted but it is holographic does not hold. sent6: that the Galilean is holographic and is not an ouster does not hold. sent7: something is not an ouster but it is cybernetic if it reschedules Picasso. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not unbreakable the mire does reschedule Picasso and is neurogenic. sent9: something is not a Hedysarum or not a nay or both. sent10: there exists something such that it is an outfitted. sent11: the fact that the Galilean is holographic but it is not an ouster is wrong if something is not a kind of an outfitted. sent12: if the Galilean is a kind of an outfitted then the fact that the mire is a kind of a doctor is not wrong. sent13: the fact that the mire is a Latrobe and it is a kind of a doctor is wrong if the fizgig is not cybernetic. sent14: if something that is not a kind of an ouster is cybernetic then it is a Latrobe. sent15: the fact that the Galilean is not holographic and not an ouster is not right if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an outfitted. sent16: the Limburger is not a Hedysarum if there exists something such that it is either not a Hedysarum or not a nay or both.
sent3 & sent15 -> int1: that the Galilean is not holographic and it is not an ouster is incorrect.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the fizgig is not cybernetic.; sent13 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the mire is a Latrobe and is a doctor.
sent14 -> int3: if the mire is not an ouster and is cybernetic it is a Latrobe.; sent7 -> int4: if the mire does reschedule Picasso it is not an ouster and it is cybernetic.; sent2 & sent8 -> int5: the mire reschedules Picasso and it is not non-neurogenic.; int5 -> int6: the mire does reschedule Picasso.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the mire is not a kind of an ouster but it is cybernetic.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the mire is a kind of a Latrobe.; sent9 & sent16 -> int9: the Limburger is not a Hedysarum.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a Hedysarum.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: that the fizgig is not an outfitted but it is holographic is wrong.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is not an outfitted and it is holographic is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mire is a kind of a Latrobe and it is a doctor is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Galilean is not holographic but it is an ouster is false if there exists something such that it is not an outfitted. sent2: there exists something such that it is not unbreakable. sent3: something is not an outfitted. sent4: the fizgig is non-cybernetic if that the Galilean is a kind of non-holographic thing that is not a kind of an ouster is not true. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a Hedysarum then that the fizgig is not an outfitted but it is holographic does not hold. sent6: that the Galilean is holographic and is not an ouster does not hold. sent7: something is not an ouster but it is cybernetic if it reschedules Picasso. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not unbreakable the mire does reschedule Picasso and is neurogenic. sent9: something is not a Hedysarum or not a nay or both. sent10: there exists something such that it is an outfitted. sent11: the fact that the Galilean is holographic but it is not an ouster is wrong if something is not a kind of an outfitted. sent12: if the Galilean is a kind of an outfitted then the fact that the mire is a kind of a doctor is not wrong. sent13: the fact that the mire is a Latrobe and it is a kind of a doctor is wrong if the fizgig is not cybernetic. sent14: if something that is not a kind of an ouster is cybernetic then it is a Latrobe. sent15: the fact that the Galilean is not holographic and not an ouster is not right if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an outfitted. sent16: the Limburger is not a Hedysarum if there exists something such that it is either not a Hedysarum or not a nay or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent15 -> int1: that the Galilean is not holographic and it is not an ouster is incorrect.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the fizgig is not cybernetic.; sent13 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__