the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a weld and/or is an ade is incorrect then the fact that it corresponds fetter hold is false.
sent1: something is a sarcophagus if that it is not a kind of a engorgement and/or it is one-piece does not hold. sent2: if the fact that something is not a weld and/or is an ade does not hold that it corresponds fetter hold. sent3: if the fact that something welds and/or is an ade is incorrect it does correspond fetter. sent4: the armory is an ade if that either it is a ready-made or it is not patient or both does not hold. sent5: the ancient does correspond fetter if it is not a weld and/or is an ade. sent6: something avoids armory if the fact that it either is a convert or corresponds sericulturist or both is not correct. sent7: if something does not wet and/or it avoids Ammotragus then it is a kind of a Gomphrena. sent8: if the fact that the ancient does not correspond fetter or it is stoichiometric or both is incorrect then it is intolerant. sent9: there exists something such that if that either it does weld or it is an ade or both does not hold the fact that it corresponds fetter is right. sent10: something is blacking if that it is a kind of a all-rounder or it corresponds sprawl or both does not hold. sent11: if the fact that the ancient is non-husbandly or it is a weld or both is not true it is Beethovenian. sent12: there exists something such that if either it does not weld or it is a kind of an ade or both then it corresponds fetter.
sent2 -> int1: if that the ancient is not a weld and/or it is a kind of an ade does not hold then it does correspond fetter.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a weld and/or is an ade is incorrect then the fact that it corresponds fetter hold is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a sarcophagus if that it is not a kind of a engorgement and/or it is one-piece does not hold. sent2: if the fact that something is not a weld and/or is an ade does not hold that it corresponds fetter hold. sent3: if the fact that something welds and/or is an ade is incorrect it does correspond fetter. sent4: the armory is an ade if that either it is a ready-made or it is not patient or both does not hold. sent5: the ancient does correspond fetter if it is not a weld and/or is an ade. sent6: something avoids armory if the fact that it either is a convert or corresponds sericulturist or both is not correct. sent7: if something does not wet and/or it avoids Ammotragus then it is a kind of a Gomphrena. sent8: if the fact that the ancient does not correspond fetter or it is stoichiometric or both is incorrect then it is intolerant. sent9: there exists something such that if that either it does weld or it is an ade or both does not hold the fact that it corresponds fetter is right. sent10: something is blacking if that it is a kind of a all-rounder or it corresponds sprawl or both does not hold. sent11: if the fact that the ancient is non-husbandly or it is a weld or both is not true it is Beethovenian. sent12: there exists something such that if either it does not weld or it is a kind of an ade or both then it corresponds fetter. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if that the ancient is not a weld and/or it is a kind of an ade does not hold then it does correspond fetter.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__