the fact that the squash is a kind of a glued and is not a hippocampus is wrong.
sent1: the Sadducee is not liturgical if the Best does vitriol jaundiced and is a kind of a hippocampus. sent2: that the Sadducee is a hippocampus and a glued is wrong if that it is not non-endergonic is not false. sent3: that something is both corporeal and not non-endergonic is wrong if it is not liturgical. sent4: if the fact that the Sadducee is corporeal thing that is not endergonic is wrong it abdicates. sent5: the filicide is a kind of a hippocampus if that the squash does not die is correct. sent6: the filicide is not a die but it does redirect whitehead if the fact that the Sadducee does abdicate is not incorrect. sent7: the squash is a kind of a glued. sent8: if the Best is not a hippocampus then the squash does glue. sent9: if the filicide vitriols anglophobe then the fact that it is not a die and it does redirect whitehead is incorrect. sent10: if something is not liturgical then the fact that it is corporeal and is not endergonic is wrong. sent11: the squash does glue and is not a hippocampus if the Best is not a hippocampus. sent12: the Best does vitriol jaundiced. sent13: if the Sadducee glues the squash is both not corporeal and endergonic. sent14: that the squash is a glued and it is endergonic is not right. sent15: That the anglophobe vitriols filicide hold. sent16: the Best does abdicate and is corporeal if it is not a die. sent17: the fact that the habit is sublingual and is corporeal is not correct. sent18: The jaundiced does vitriol Best. sent19: that the filicide vitriols anglophobe hold. sent20: if something vitriols jaundiced then the fact that it is a kind of a glued that is not a hippocampus is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Best is a hippocampus.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the Best vitriols jaundiced and is a hippocampus.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Sadducee is non-liturgical.; sent10 -> int3: that the Sadducee is corporeal but it is not endergonic is not true if it is not liturgical.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the Sadducee is corporeal and is not endergonic does not hold.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the Sadducee does abdicate.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the filicide is not a die but it redirects whitehead.; sent9 & sent19 -> int7: the fact that the filicide is not a die but it does redirect whitehead is not true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Best is not a kind of a hippocampus.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the squash is a kind of a glued but it is not a hippocampus is not correct.
sent20 -> int10: if the squash vitriols jaundiced then the fact that it is a glued and it is not a hippocampus is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the squash is a kind of a glued and is not a hippocampus is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Sadducee is not liturgical if the Best does vitriol jaundiced and is a kind of a hippocampus. sent2: that the Sadducee is a hippocampus and a glued is wrong if that it is not non-endergonic is not false. sent3: that something is both corporeal and not non-endergonic is wrong if it is not liturgical. sent4: if the fact that the Sadducee is corporeal thing that is not endergonic is wrong it abdicates. sent5: the filicide is a kind of a hippocampus if that the squash does not die is correct. sent6: the filicide is not a die but it does redirect whitehead if the fact that the Sadducee does abdicate is not incorrect. sent7: the squash is a kind of a glued. sent8: if the Best is not a hippocampus then the squash does glue. sent9: if the filicide vitriols anglophobe then the fact that it is not a die and it does redirect whitehead is incorrect. sent10: if something is not liturgical then the fact that it is corporeal and is not endergonic is wrong. sent11: the squash does glue and is not a hippocampus if the Best is not a hippocampus. sent12: the Best does vitriol jaundiced. sent13: if the Sadducee glues the squash is both not corporeal and endergonic. sent14: that the squash is a glued and it is endergonic is not right. sent15: That the anglophobe vitriols filicide hold. sent16: the Best does abdicate and is corporeal if it is not a die. sent17: the fact that the habit is sublingual and is corporeal is not correct. sent18: The jaundiced does vitriol Best. sent19: that the filicide vitriols anglophobe hold. sent20: if something vitriols jaundiced then the fact that it is a kind of a glued that is not a hippocampus is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Best is a hippocampus.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the Best vitriols jaundiced and is a hippocampus.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Sadducee is non-liturgical.; sent10 -> int3: that the Sadducee is corporeal but it is not endergonic is not true if it is not liturgical.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the Sadducee is corporeal and is not endergonic does not hold.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the Sadducee does abdicate.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the filicide is not a die but it redirects whitehead.; sent9 & sent19 -> int7: the fact that the filicide is not a die but it does redirect whitehead is not true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Best is not a kind of a hippocampus.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__