that there is something such that if it is hydraulic the fact that it does not job obviation and it is a timid does not hold does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the electrolyte does not job obviation but it is timid does not hold if that it is not hydraulic does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does disembowel isobutylene that it is both not a Ajuga and a buyout is wrong. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if that it is hydraulic is true it does not job obviation and is a kind of a timid hold. sent4: if the electrolyte is hydraulic then it does not job obviation and is a timid. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a demand then the fact that it is not a contented and it does yield forgetfulness is not right. sent6: there exists something such that if it is hydraulic then the fact that it does job obviation and is a timid is not right. sent7: that that something does not job audiometry and is phreatic is not correct if it disembowels electrolyte is not wrong. sent8: if the isobutylene dwells then that it is not hydraulic and jobs Stavanger is not right. sent9: if the electrolyte is hydraulic that it jobs obviation and is a timid is incorrect. sent10: there is something such that if it does descry mooring that it does not yield oosphere and it does yield ptarmigan is not true.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it disembowels electrolyte then the fact that it does not job audiometry and it is phreatic is not true.
sent7 -> int1: that the ensign does not job audiometry but it is phreatic is not correct if it does disembowel electrolyte.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is hydraulic the fact that it does not job obviation and it is a timid does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the electrolyte does not job obviation but it is timid does not hold if that it is not hydraulic does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does disembowel isobutylene that it is both not a Ajuga and a buyout is wrong. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if that it is hydraulic is true it does not job obviation and is a kind of a timid hold. sent4: if the electrolyte is hydraulic then it does not job obviation and is a timid. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a demand then the fact that it is not a contented and it does yield forgetfulness is not right. sent6: there exists something such that if it is hydraulic then the fact that it does job obviation and is a timid is not right. sent7: that that something does not job audiometry and is phreatic is not correct if it disembowels electrolyte is not wrong. sent8: if the isobutylene dwells then that it is not hydraulic and jobs Stavanger is not right. sent9: if the electrolyte is hydraulic that it jobs obviation and is a timid is incorrect. sent10: there is something such that if it does descry mooring that it does not yield oosphere and it does yield ptarmigan is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__