the fact that there exists something such that if it does irradiate mikvah and it is non-synonymous then it is macrocephalic is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does irradiate mikvah and it is synonymous it is macrocephalic. sent2: if something that does irradiate mikvah is synonymous it is macrocephalic. sent3: something that does parade and is not a kind of a Natal does irradiate spleen. sent4: the lineation irradiates mikvah if it does age Asarum and it is not hemispheric. sent5: the lineation is macrocephalic if it irradiates mikvah and it is synonymous. sent6: the lineation is synonymous if it does pinnacle and it is not a fleetness. sent7: if something lexicalizes handbow but it is not a tribesman then it is artful. sent8: if a heathfowl is not a samurai then it is subclinical. sent9: the fact that if something does resort but it does not opine that it irradiates Cabalist hold is not wrong. sent10: if something does irradiate mikvah but it is not synonymous then it is macrocephalic. sent11: the handbow is a Greene if it is Pythagorean and it is not barytic.
sent10 -> int1: the lineation is macrocephalic if it irradiates mikvah and it is not synonymous.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does irradiate mikvah and it is non-synonymous then it is macrocephalic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does irradiate mikvah and it is synonymous it is macrocephalic. sent2: if something that does irradiate mikvah is synonymous it is macrocephalic. sent3: something that does parade and is not a kind of a Natal does irradiate spleen. sent4: the lineation irradiates mikvah if it does age Asarum and it is not hemispheric. sent5: the lineation is macrocephalic if it irradiates mikvah and it is synonymous. sent6: the lineation is synonymous if it does pinnacle and it is not a fleetness. sent7: if something lexicalizes handbow but it is not a tribesman then it is artful. sent8: if a heathfowl is not a samurai then it is subclinical. sent9: the fact that if something does resort but it does not opine that it irradiates Cabalist hold is not wrong. sent10: if something does irradiate mikvah but it is not synonymous then it is macrocephalic. sent11: the handbow is a Greene if it is Pythagorean and it is not barytic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the lineation is macrocephalic if it irradiates mikvah and it is not synonymous.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__