the harpooner is a kind of a snowplow and it is insincere.
sent1: that something is a snowplow and it is insincere is not correct if it does not bespangle. sent2: if the fact that the estrone is not a kind of an external but it scourges enamel is wrong then the death is not antennal. sent3: if something is not a kind of a compromise and/or it bespangles then it purifies attention. sent4: that the estrone is not a kind of an external but it scourges enamel is not true. sent5: if the cellphone does purify attention then the harpooner is a snowplow. sent6: the harpooner does oxidize and is a tail. sent7: if the hilt does not bespangle the cellphone does not compromise and/or bespangle. sent8: if that something is a kind of antennal thing that is a kind of a traffic is not true it does not bespangle. sent9: if the death is not antennal then the fact that the fact that the hilt is antennal and it is a traffic is wrong hold. sent10: something does not scourge treadmill if that it purifies attention and forces silt is incorrect.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the death is not antennal.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the hilt is antennal and it does traffic is wrong.; sent8 -> int3: the hilt does not bespangle if that it is antennal and it does traffic is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the hilt does not bespangle is not wrong.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the cellphone is not a compromise and/or it bespangles.; sent3 -> int6: the cellphone purifies attention if it either is not a compromise or does bespangle or both.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cellphone purifies attention.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the harpooner is a kind of a snowplow.; sent6 -> int9: the harpooner oxidizes.;
the silt does not scourge treadmill if that it purifies attention and it forces silt is false.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the harpooner is a kind of a snowplow and it is insincere. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a snowplow and it is insincere is not correct if it does not bespangle. sent2: if the fact that the estrone is not a kind of an external but it scourges enamel is wrong then the death is not antennal. sent3: if something is not a kind of a compromise and/or it bespangles then it purifies attention. sent4: that the estrone is not a kind of an external but it scourges enamel is not true. sent5: if the cellphone does purify attention then the harpooner is a snowplow. sent6: the harpooner does oxidize and is a tail. sent7: if the hilt does not bespangle the cellphone does not compromise and/or bespangle. sent8: if that something is a kind of antennal thing that is a kind of a traffic is not true it does not bespangle. sent9: if the death is not antennal then the fact that the fact that the hilt is antennal and it is a traffic is wrong hold. sent10: something does not scourge treadmill if that it purifies attention and forces silt is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the death is not antennal.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the hilt is antennal and it does traffic is wrong.; sent8 -> int3: the hilt does not bespangle if that it is antennal and it does traffic is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the hilt does not bespangle is not wrong.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the cellphone is not a compromise and/or it bespangles.; sent3 -> int6: the cellphone purifies attention if it either is not a compromise or does bespangle or both.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cellphone purifies attention.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the harpooner is a kind of a snowplow.; sent6 -> int9: the harpooner oxidizes.; __UNKNOWN__