the laxness happens.
sent1: the survey occurs and the sparring does not occur if the ambushing pyrilamine happens. sent2: if the hostileness does not occur then the accentualness and the insinuating occurs. sent3: that the ambushing pyrilamine occurs is right. sent4: that the accelerating unorthodoxy does not occur and the charging occurs prevents the contrast. sent5: the accentualness happens. sent6: the compromising eligibility does not occur. sent7: that the ambushing Advent does not occur is brought about by that the deactivation does not occur and the surveying happens. sent8: the fixture occurs. sent9: if the surveying does not occur then the fact that the insinuating does not occur and the deactivation does not occur is false. sent10: that the accelerating unorthodoxy does not occur and the charge happens prevents that the compromising nightmare happens. sent11: the fact that the ambushing cuckoo-bumblebee does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: that the insinuating does not occur is caused by that the quivering unorthodoxy occurs and the deactivation occurs. sent13: the spar does not occur if the ambushing pyrilamine happens. sent14: the sparring does not occur. sent15: that the adnexalness does not occur is true. sent16: the accentualness occurs if the hostile does not occur. sent17: the laxness happens and the ambushing tontine happens if the fact that the quivering unorthodoxy does not occur hold. sent18: the semioticness does not occur. sent19: the hostile does not occur. sent20: both the ambushing tontine and the quivering unorthodoxy happens. sent21: if the ambushing Advent does not occur then the laxness does not occur. sent22: that both the compromising rowing and the altruisticness occurs is triggered by that the punctuation does not occur. sent23: the appointment but not the compromising completion occurs. sent24: the ambushing tontine happens.
sent20 -> int1: the quivering unorthodoxy occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deactivation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the quivering unorthodoxy happens and the deactivation occurs.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the insinuating does not occur.; sent2 & sent19 -> int4: that both the accentualness and the insinuating occurs hold.; int4 -> int5: the insinuating happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the deactivation occurs is not true.; sent1 & sent3 -> int8: the surveying but not the spar occurs.; int8 -> int9: the survey occurs.; int7 & int9 -> int10: not the deactivation but the survey occurs.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the fact that the ambushing Advent does not occur is not false.; int11 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the laxness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the laxness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the survey occurs and the sparring does not occur if the ambushing pyrilamine happens. sent2: if the hostileness does not occur then the accentualness and the insinuating occurs. sent3: that the ambushing pyrilamine occurs is right. sent4: that the accelerating unorthodoxy does not occur and the charging occurs prevents the contrast. sent5: the accentualness happens. sent6: the compromising eligibility does not occur. sent7: that the ambushing Advent does not occur is brought about by that the deactivation does not occur and the surveying happens. sent8: the fixture occurs. sent9: if the surveying does not occur then the fact that the insinuating does not occur and the deactivation does not occur is false. sent10: that the accelerating unorthodoxy does not occur and the charge happens prevents that the compromising nightmare happens. sent11: the fact that the ambushing cuckoo-bumblebee does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: that the insinuating does not occur is caused by that the quivering unorthodoxy occurs and the deactivation occurs. sent13: the spar does not occur if the ambushing pyrilamine happens. sent14: the sparring does not occur. sent15: that the adnexalness does not occur is true. sent16: the accentualness occurs if the hostile does not occur. sent17: the laxness happens and the ambushing tontine happens if the fact that the quivering unorthodoxy does not occur hold. sent18: the semioticness does not occur. sent19: the hostile does not occur. sent20: both the ambushing tontine and the quivering unorthodoxy happens. sent21: if the ambushing Advent does not occur then the laxness does not occur. sent22: that both the compromising rowing and the altruisticness occurs is triggered by that the punctuation does not occur. sent23: the appointment but not the compromising completion occurs. sent24: the ambushing tontine happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the quivering unorthodoxy occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deactivation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the quivering unorthodoxy happens and the deactivation occurs.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the insinuating does not occur.; sent2 & sent19 -> int4: that both the accentualness and the insinuating occurs hold.; int4 -> int5: the insinuating happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the deactivation occurs is not true.; sent1 & sent3 -> int8: the surveying but not the spar occurs.; int8 -> int9: the survey occurs.; int7 & int9 -> int10: not the deactivation but the survey occurs.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the fact that the ambushing Advent does not occur is not false.; int11 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__