the emotionalness is triggered by the quantitativeness.
sent1: the staling canyon happens. sent2: the fact that the staling aikido occurs is not wrong. sent3: both the hurling and the digitalization occurs if the counterattack does not occur. sent4: that the preparation happens prevents the non-Churchillianness. sent5: the functioning happens. sent6: that the staling apodeme happens brings about that the smashing inamorato occurs. sent7: if the quantitativeness occurs the brunetness happens. sent8: that not the counterattack but the reigning heads-up happens is right if the saxicolousness does not occur. sent9: if the synopticness occurs then the agonizing occurs. sent10: that the pemphigousness happens hold. sent11: that the keratotomy but not the reigning surrealism happens is not true if the smashing repulsion does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the traveling does not occur but the quantitativeness happens does not hold then the traveling occurs. sent13: if the brunetness does not occur then the fact that not the travel but the quantitativeness happens is incorrect. sent14: the fact that that the saxicolousness does not occur and the undesirousness does not occur is triggered by the non-athleticsness is true. sent15: the athleticsness does not occur if that the keratotomy happens and the reigning surrealism does not occur does not hold. sent16: the emotionalness occurs if the brunetness occurs. sent17: the starlight does not occur if the fact that the digitalization occurs is not incorrect. sent18: that the frequentness does not occur but the forming occurs prevents the smashing repulsion. sent19: if the jitters happens then the non-brunetness and the emotionalness occurs. sent20: if the starlight does not occur then the jitters occurs and the pontificating occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quantitativeness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the brunetness happens is not wrong.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the emotionalness happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the travel occurs is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the emotionalness is triggered by the quantitativeness. ; $context$ = sent1: the staling canyon happens. sent2: the fact that the staling aikido occurs is not wrong. sent3: both the hurling and the digitalization occurs if the counterattack does not occur. sent4: that the preparation happens prevents the non-Churchillianness. sent5: the functioning happens. sent6: that the staling apodeme happens brings about that the smashing inamorato occurs. sent7: if the quantitativeness occurs the brunetness happens. sent8: that not the counterattack but the reigning heads-up happens is right if the saxicolousness does not occur. sent9: if the synopticness occurs then the agonizing occurs. sent10: that the pemphigousness happens hold. sent11: that the keratotomy but not the reigning surrealism happens is not true if the smashing repulsion does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the traveling does not occur but the quantitativeness happens does not hold then the traveling occurs. sent13: if the brunetness does not occur then the fact that not the travel but the quantitativeness happens is incorrect. sent14: the fact that that the saxicolousness does not occur and the undesirousness does not occur is triggered by the non-athleticsness is true. sent15: the athleticsness does not occur if that the keratotomy happens and the reigning surrealism does not occur does not hold. sent16: the emotionalness occurs if the brunetness occurs. sent17: the starlight does not occur if the fact that the digitalization occurs is not incorrect. sent18: that the frequentness does not occur but the forming occurs prevents the smashing repulsion. sent19: if the jitters happens then the non-brunetness and the emotionalness occurs. sent20: if the starlight does not occur then the jitters occurs and the pontificating occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quantitativeness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the brunetness happens is not wrong.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the emotionalness happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__