the adopter is not nonhierarchical.
sent1: the tabby does syllogize terseness. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is nonhierarchical and is coastal is not correct. sent3: the adopter is not a kind of a consultancy. sent4: if there exists something such that it is nonhierarchical the adopter is not coastal. sent5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a consultancy and it is chlorotic is false. sent6: the diphenylhydantoin is not a kind of a gladiolus if there exists something such that that that it is both not nonhierarchical and a intelligibility is not false does not hold. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a consultancy that is chlorotic does not hold. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a consultancy and is not non-chlorotic is not true then the snap is not coastal. sent9: if there are coastal things that the snap is not a leatherette and does insinuate does not hold. sent10: the adopter is not terrestrial if there is something such that that it is both not overhand and not non-chlorotic is not right. sent11: there is something such that it is not coastal and it is nonhierarchical. sent12: if there is something such that it is coastal then the snap is not nonhierarchical. sent13: there is something such that it is not a consultancy and it is chlorotic. sent14: the tabby yokes. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a consultancy then the snap is non-coastal.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the snap is not coastal.;
there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a leatherette and it insinuates is not right.
sent14 & sent1 -> int2: the tabby is a yoke that does syllogize terseness.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a kind of a yoke that syllogizes terseness.;
$hypothesis$ = the adopter is not nonhierarchical. ; $context$ = sent1: the tabby does syllogize terseness. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is nonhierarchical and is coastal is not correct. sent3: the adopter is not a kind of a consultancy. sent4: if there exists something such that it is nonhierarchical the adopter is not coastal. sent5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a consultancy and it is chlorotic is false. sent6: the diphenylhydantoin is not a kind of a gladiolus if there exists something such that that that it is both not nonhierarchical and a intelligibility is not false does not hold. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a consultancy that is chlorotic does not hold. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a consultancy and is not non-chlorotic is not true then the snap is not coastal. sent9: if there are coastal things that the snap is not a leatherette and does insinuate does not hold. sent10: the adopter is not terrestrial if there is something such that that it is both not overhand and not non-chlorotic is not right. sent11: there is something such that it is not coastal and it is nonhierarchical. sent12: if there is something such that it is coastal then the snap is not nonhierarchical. sent13: there is something such that it is not a consultancy and it is chlorotic. sent14: the tabby yokes. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a consultancy then the snap is non-coastal. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the snap is not coastal.; __UNKNOWN__