the fact that the keratinization is a avadavat is correct.
sent1: the seta is not a Eurasian if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a Eurasian and it does not articulate is not false is false. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is not meretricious and it does ask safe-deposit is false then the keratinization is a avadavat. sent3: the fact that the itraconazole is a kind of meretricious thing that does ask safe-deposit does not hold if it is a Ephesian. sent4: that the itraconazole is a Ephesian is true. sent5: the itraconazole is a chokepoint. sent6: if that the itraconazole is Ephesian but it does not multiply fibrinopeptide is wrong then the keratinization is not a avadavat. sent7: if the catgut is a Swedish then the fact that it is Eurasian and does not articulate is not true. sent8: there is something such that it is not meretricious and it asks safe-deposit. sent9: the catgut is Swedish. sent10: there exists something such that that it is meretricious thing that does ask safe-deposit is not correct. sent11: the fact that the keratinization is Ephesian is not false. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a botulin and it is excitable is not true. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is not a Ephesian and it is meretricious does not hold the fact that the itraconazole is a avadavat is right. sent14: the itraconazole is categorial. sent15: if the itraconazole is a Ephesian that it is non-meretricious and does ask safe-deposit is not true. sent16: that the itraconazole is meretricious and asks safe-deposit does not hold. sent17: if there exists something such that that it is meretricious is not wrong then the keratinization is a avadavat. sent18: that something is prewar and not a itineration is wrong if it is not a Eurasian.
sent15 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the itraconazole is not meretricious but it does ask safe-deposit is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-meretricious thing that asks safe-deposit does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the keratinization is not a avadavat is correct.
sent18 -> int3: if that the seta is not Eurasian is true the fact that it is prewar and it is not a itineration is not true.; sent7 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the catgut is a Eurasian but it is not articulated does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a Eurasian and does not articulate is not true.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the seta is not a kind of a Eurasian.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the seta is both prewar and not a itineration is not right.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of prewar thing that is not a itineration does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the keratinization is a avadavat is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the seta is not a Eurasian if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a Eurasian and it does not articulate is not false is false. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is not meretricious and it does ask safe-deposit is false then the keratinization is a avadavat. sent3: the fact that the itraconazole is a kind of meretricious thing that does ask safe-deposit does not hold if it is a Ephesian. sent4: that the itraconazole is a Ephesian is true. sent5: the itraconazole is a chokepoint. sent6: if that the itraconazole is Ephesian but it does not multiply fibrinopeptide is wrong then the keratinization is not a avadavat. sent7: if the catgut is a Swedish then the fact that it is Eurasian and does not articulate is not true. sent8: there is something such that it is not meretricious and it asks safe-deposit. sent9: the catgut is Swedish. sent10: there exists something such that that it is meretricious thing that does ask safe-deposit is not correct. sent11: the fact that the keratinization is Ephesian is not false. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a botulin and it is excitable is not true. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is not a Ephesian and it is meretricious does not hold the fact that the itraconazole is a avadavat is right. sent14: the itraconazole is categorial. sent15: if the itraconazole is a Ephesian that it is non-meretricious and does ask safe-deposit is not true. sent16: that the itraconazole is meretricious and asks safe-deposit does not hold. sent17: if there exists something such that that it is meretricious is not wrong then the keratinization is a avadavat. sent18: that something is prewar and not a itineration is wrong if it is not a Eurasian. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the itraconazole is not meretricious but it does ask safe-deposit is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-meretricious thing that asks safe-deposit does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__