the fact that if that the weatherglass bounds hold then the distributary does freckle is false.
sent1: the fact that the distributary is a kind of a freckled is not false if the corncob is neuropsychological. sent2: if the weatherglass does bound that the corncob is neuropsychological and it is counterfeit is not right. sent3: the fact that the fact that the corncob is neuropsychological and is counterfeit is not correct is true. sent4: the weatherglass does bound if the fact that the corncob is a kind of non-neuropsychological a freckled does not hold. sent5: the fact that the fact that the corncob is non-neuropsychological but it does bound hold does not hold. sent6: that the corncob is not a freckled but neuropsychological is incorrect if the distributary is counterfeit. sent7: if the fact that the corncob is both not neuropsychological and not non-counterfeit is false the distributary is a freckled. sent8: that the distributary is not bounded but it does freckle is wrong. sent9: if the weatherglass does bound then that the corncob is not neuropsychological and is a counterfeit is not correct. sent10: that the corncob is non-neuropsychological and a freckled is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weatherglass does bound.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the corncob is non-neuropsychological and counterfeit is not right.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the distributary does freckle.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the weatherglass bounds hold then the distributary does freckle is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the distributary is a kind of a freckled is not false if the corncob is neuropsychological. sent2: if the weatherglass does bound that the corncob is neuropsychological and it is counterfeit is not right. sent3: the fact that the fact that the corncob is neuropsychological and is counterfeit is not correct is true. sent4: the weatherglass does bound if the fact that the corncob is a kind of non-neuropsychological a freckled does not hold. sent5: the fact that the fact that the corncob is non-neuropsychological but it does bound hold does not hold. sent6: that the corncob is not a freckled but neuropsychological is incorrect if the distributary is counterfeit. sent7: if the fact that the corncob is both not neuropsychological and not non-counterfeit is false the distributary is a freckled. sent8: that the distributary is not bounded but it does freckle is wrong. sent9: if the weatherglass does bound then that the corncob is not neuropsychological and is a counterfeit is not correct. sent10: that the corncob is non-neuropsychological and a freckled is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weatherglass does bound.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the corncob is non-neuropsychological and counterfeit is not right.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the distributary does freckle.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__