the glyptography is a kind of a Tharp and it is hepatic.
sent1: the glyptography does not besiege fluosilicate if the fact that the ptyalism is not benign and is a kind of an acrylic does not hold. sent2: something is Soviet. sent3: the handbow is not an acrylic if something that props Pseudepigrapha is not a frost. sent4: something does prop Pseudepigrapha but it does not frost if it is not a Congolese. sent5: if something is Soviet the driveway is not a Congolese. sent6: that something is a Tharp that is hepatic is not right if it does not besiege fluosilicate. sent7: if the fact that the handbow is not an acrylic is true that the ptyalism is both not benign and an acrylic is false.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the driveway is not Congolese hold.; sent4 -> int2: if the driveway is not Congolese it does prop Pseudepigrapha and it does not frost.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the driveway does prop Pseudepigrapha and does not frost.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does prop Pseudepigrapha and it is not a frost.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the handbow is not an acrylic.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the ptyalism is non-benign an acrylic is incorrect.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the glyptography does not besiege fluosilicate.; sent6 -> int8: the fact that the glyptography is both a Tharp and hepatic is not right if it does not besiege fluosilicate.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the glyptography is a kind of a Tharp and it is hepatic. ; $context$ = sent1: the glyptography does not besiege fluosilicate if the fact that the ptyalism is not benign and is a kind of an acrylic does not hold. sent2: something is Soviet. sent3: the handbow is not an acrylic if something that props Pseudepigrapha is not a frost. sent4: something does prop Pseudepigrapha but it does not frost if it is not a Congolese. sent5: if something is Soviet the driveway is not a Congolese. sent6: that something is a Tharp that is hepatic is not right if it does not besiege fluosilicate. sent7: if the fact that the handbow is not an acrylic is true that the ptyalism is both not benign and an acrylic is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the driveway is not Congolese hold.; sent4 -> int2: if the driveway is not Congolese it does prop Pseudepigrapha and it does not frost.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the driveway does prop Pseudepigrapha and does not frost.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does prop Pseudepigrapha and it is not a frost.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the handbow is not an acrylic.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the ptyalism is non-benign an acrylic is incorrect.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the glyptography does not besiege fluosilicate.; sent6 -> int8: the fact that the glyptography is both a Tharp and hepatic is not right if it does not besiege fluosilicate.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__