the obstetrician does not narrate Tachyglossus or is a carbonara or both.
sent1: that the crow is not a barilla and it is not coeliac is wrong if the scour is not maturational. sent2: if the fact that the crow is not a barilla but non-coeliac is wrong then the obstetrician is unfaithful. sent3: something does not narrate Methodism and/or is an ergotism if it narrates hostile. sent4: the fact that the obstetrician is not coeliac is right. sent5: if something is both not unfaithful and not non-coeliac it is not a barilla. sent6: the fact that the obstetrician does not narrate Tachyglossus and/or it is a carbonara is wrong if the crow is not a kind of a barilla. sent7: either something does not narrate Tachyglossus or it is a kind of a carbonara or both if it is unfaithful. sent8: the scour is a kind of a barilla if that that the crow is not maturational and is not a doubting is not false is false. sent9: everything is both a doubting and not maturational.
sent9 -> int1: the scour does doubt but it is not maturational.; int1 -> int2: the scour is not maturational.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the crow is not a barilla and not coeliac is false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the obstetrician is unfaithful.; sent7 -> int5: either the obstetrician does not narrate Tachyglossus or it is a carbonara or both if it is unfaithful.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the obstetrician does not narrate Tachyglossus and/or it is a carbonara is incorrect.
sent5 -> int6: if the crow is faithful thing that is coeliac it is not a kind of a barilla.;
$hypothesis$ = the obstetrician does not narrate Tachyglossus or is a carbonara or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the crow is not a barilla and it is not coeliac is wrong if the scour is not maturational. sent2: if the fact that the crow is not a barilla but non-coeliac is wrong then the obstetrician is unfaithful. sent3: something does not narrate Methodism and/or is an ergotism if it narrates hostile. sent4: the fact that the obstetrician is not coeliac is right. sent5: if something is both not unfaithful and not non-coeliac it is not a barilla. sent6: the fact that the obstetrician does not narrate Tachyglossus and/or it is a carbonara is wrong if the crow is not a kind of a barilla. sent7: either something does not narrate Tachyglossus or it is a kind of a carbonara or both if it is unfaithful. sent8: the scour is a kind of a barilla if that that the crow is not maturational and is not a doubting is not false is false. sent9: everything is both a doubting and not maturational. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the scour does doubt but it is not maturational.; int1 -> int2: the scour is not maturational.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the crow is not a barilla and not coeliac is false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the obstetrician is unfaithful.; sent7 -> int5: either the obstetrician does not narrate Tachyglossus or it is a carbonara or both if it is unfaithful.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__