the fact that the Court is sensory and does not sigh percher is not wrong.
sent1: the Court is sensory if something is a euchre or does not level Courbet or both. sent2: something is alliaceous if it is a haft. sent3: that the camouflage is not dualistic and it is non-entozoic is not correct. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is not majuscule and not a haft is wrong the camouflage is a kind of a haft. sent5: the fact that the artilleryman is neurogenic is not incorrect if the antiparticle is not a kind of an upright. sent6: the antiparticle is a kind of a haft if the artilleryman is majuscule. sent7: if something does sun bullnose then it is neurogenic. sent8: the antiparticle is upright and is ectomorphic. sent9: if something is a kind of neurogenic an upright then the Court does not sigh percher. sent10: that the artilleryman is majuscule is right if that the camouflage is a kind of non-dualistic thing that is not entozoic is incorrect. sent11: that something is non-majuscule thing that is not a kind of a haft is wrong if it is neurogenic. sent12: the custom-made is a euchre and/or it does not level Courbet.
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the artilleryman is majuscule.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the antiparticle is a haft.; sent7 -> int3: if the antiparticle does sun bullnose it is neurogenic.; sent8 -> int4: the antiparticle is an upright.; sent12 -> int5: something is a euchre and/or it does not level Courbet.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the Court is sensory.;
the fact that the fact that the blower is non-alliaceous thing that does not sun bullnose does not hold hold.
sent2 -> int7: the fact that the camouflage is alliaceous if the camouflage is a haft hold.; sent11 -> int8: the fact that the artilleryman is both not majuscule and not a haft is not right if it is neurogenic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Court is sensory and does not sigh percher is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Court is sensory if something is a euchre or does not level Courbet or both. sent2: something is alliaceous if it is a haft. sent3: that the camouflage is not dualistic and it is non-entozoic is not correct. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is not majuscule and not a haft is wrong the camouflage is a kind of a haft. sent5: the fact that the artilleryman is neurogenic is not incorrect if the antiparticle is not a kind of an upright. sent6: the antiparticle is a kind of a haft if the artilleryman is majuscule. sent7: if something does sun bullnose then it is neurogenic. sent8: the antiparticle is upright and is ectomorphic. sent9: if something is a kind of neurogenic an upright then the Court does not sigh percher. sent10: that the artilleryman is majuscule is right if that the camouflage is a kind of non-dualistic thing that is not entozoic is incorrect. sent11: that something is non-majuscule thing that is not a kind of a haft is wrong if it is neurogenic. sent12: the custom-made is a euchre and/or it does not level Courbet. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the artilleryman is majuscule.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the antiparticle is a haft.; sent7 -> int3: if the antiparticle does sun bullnose it is neurogenic.; sent8 -> int4: the antiparticle is an upright.; sent12 -> int5: something is a euchre and/or it does not level Courbet.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the Court is sensory.; __UNKNOWN__