the Mormon does glamorize colorimetry.
sent1: the carrel does not hate flap and is Britannic. sent2: the carrel is not a arcsecant but it is legible. sent3: the carrel is both not a neurosurgery and a radome if the Mormon is a neurosurgery. sent4: the pansexual is not a kind of a antifeminist but it does hate Meade. sent5: that the Mormon does not glamorize colorimetry is right if the carrel is a neurosurgery but it does not glamorize colorimetry. sent6: the fact that the protegee is a radome is not incorrect. sent7: the Mormon is a conceited that is a trump if the airline is not a arcsecant. sent8: the carrel is not a radome but it glamorizes colorimetry if the Mormon does trump. sent9: if the carrel is a radome then the Mormon is not a radome but it does glamorize colorimetry. sent10: that the carrel is both a trump and not a radome is not true. sent11: if the fact that the drive is not small-capitalization and dominates Marvell is false then the Liederkranz is small-capitalization. sent12: something that is not a conceited is a trump but not a radome. sent13: the congealment is a neurosurgery. sent14: if the drive does not dominate hydromel then the fact that it is not small-capitalization and does dominate Marvell is false. sent15: the Mormon does not glamorize colorimetry if the carrel is not a neurosurgery and glamorize colorimetry. sent16: the carrel is not a neurosurgery but it glamorizes colorimetry if the Mormon is a neurosurgery. sent17: something that is not a kind of a radome is not a kind of a neurosurgery and glamorizes colorimetry.
the Mormon does not glamorize colorimetry.
$hypothesis$ = the Mormon does glamorize colorimetry. ; $context$ = sent1: the carrel does not hate flap and is Britannic. sent2: the carrel is not a arcsecant but it is legible. sent3: the carrel is both not a neurosurgery and a radome if the Mormon is a neurosurgery. sent4: the pansexual is not a kind of a antifeminist but it does hate Meade. sent5: that the Mormon does not glamorize colorimetry is right if the carrel is a neurosurgery but it does not glamorize colorimetry. sent6: the fact that the protegee is a radome is not incorrect. sent7: the Mormon is a conceited that is a trump if the airline is not a arcsecant. sent8: the carrel is not a radome but it glamorizes colorimetry if the Mormon does trump. sent9: if the carrel is a radome then the Mormon is not a radome but it does glamorize colorimetry. sent10: that the carrel is both a trump and not a radome is not true. sent11: if the fact that the drive is not small-capitalization and dominates Marvell is false then the Liederkranz is small-capitalization. sent12: something that is not a conceited is a trump but not a radome. sent13: the congealment is a neurosurgery. sent14: if the drive does not dominate hydromel then the fact that it is not small-capitalization and does dominate Marvell is false. sent15: the Mormon does not glamorize colorimetry if the carrel is not a neurosurgery and glamorize colorimetry. sent16: the carrel is not a neurosurgery but it glamorizes colorimetry if the Mormon is a neurosurgery. sent17: something that is not a kind of a radome is not a kind of a neurosurgery and glamorizes colorimetry. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__