if the furnace is not non-quincentennial the articulation governs loot.
sent1: the furnace governs loot if the articulation is a quincentennial. sent2: the papaw is not non-quincentennial if the furnace is a laxative. sent3: something is benign if it is credible. sent4: something is a kind of a sum if it governs tetrodotoxin. sent5: if the fact that the palliative is a sycophancy is true that it is a kind of a Atrovent hold. sent6: the articulation inundates stylist. sent7: something is a kind of a laxative if that it governs loot hold. sent8: if something governs loot it is quincentennial. sent9: the furnace is laxative. sent10: the articulation is not non-quincentennial. sent11: if the furnace is a laxative then the articulation is quincentennial. sent12: that the refectory is laxative is right. sent13: if the articulation is not a kind of an incompetent then the furnace does govern loot and it is Gauguinesque. sent14: something does govern loot if it is a kind of a laxative. sent15: the articulation is a kind of a quincentennial if the furnace governs loot. sent16: if the shirtdress does not govern afterthought that the architecture is not a timepiece and it is not a helminth is incorrect. sent17: the furnace governs loot. sent18: the Tibetan is a laxative. sent19: if the articulation attenuates it is biblical.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the furnace is quincentennial.; sent14 -> int1: if the articulation is laxative then it does govern loot.;
the papaw is not non-quincentennial.
sent7 -> int2: the furnace is a kind of a laxative if it does govern loot.;
$hypothesis$ = if the furnace is not non-quincentennial the articulation governs loot. ; $context$ = sent1: the furnace governs loot if the articulation is a quincentennial. sent2: the papaw is not non-quincentennial if the furnace is a laxative. sent3: something is benign if it is credible. sent4: something is a kind of a sum if it governs tetrodotoxin. sent5: if the fact that the palliative is a sycophancy is true that it is a kind of a Atrovent hold. sent6: the articulation inundates stylist. sent7: something is a kind of a laxative if that it governs loot hold. sent8: if something governs loot it is quincentennial. sent9: the furnace is laxative. sent10: the articulation is not non-quincentennial. sent11: if the furnace is a laxative then the articulation is quincentennial. sent12: that the refectory is laxative is right. sent13: if the articulation is not a kind of an incompetent then the furnace does govern loot and it is Gauguinesque. sent14: something does govern loot if it is a kind of a laxative. sent15: the articulation is a kind of a quincentennial if the furnace governs loot. sent16: if the shirtdress does not govern afterthought that the architecture is not a timepiece and it is not a helminth is incorrect. sent17: the furnace governs loot. sent18: the Tibetan is a laxative. sent19: if the articulation attenuates it is biblical. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the furnace is quincentennial.; sent14 -> int1: if the articulation is laxative then it does govern loot.; __UNKNOWN__