not the pouring Geastraceae but the roboticness happens if the barbarizing butterfat happens.
sent1: the axillariness occurs. sent2: if the maturing happens the pouring glomerulus occurs. sent3: the pouring glomerulus occurs if the schism happens. sent4: if the straining happens the geometricness does not occur. sent5: that the pouring Breuer occurs and the anti-semiticness occurs prevents that the immiscibleness happens. sent6: the roboticness occurs. sent7: if the avirulentness occurs then the deconstructionistness does not occur but the fundamentals occurs. sent8: that the barbarizing butterfat happens is prevented by that the pouring glomerulus occurs and the pouring Geastraceae happens. sent9: that the barbarizing butterfat does not occur is prevented by that the pouring glomerulus and the pouring Geastraceae happens. sent10: the fact that the Scandinavian happens is not wrong. sent11: the fact that the fact that the roboticness happens and the barbarizing butterfat does not occur is not false is wrong if the geometricness does not occur. sent12: that the blunting happens prevents that the equation does not occur. sent13: the uplink and the retrieval happens. sent14: either the maturing happens or the schism happens or both.
sent14 & sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the pouring glomerulus happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pouring Geastraceae occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the pouring glomerulus occurs and the pouring Geastraceae occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the barbarizing butterfat does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barbarizing butterfat occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the pouring Geastraceae does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the pouring Geastraceae does not occur and the roboticness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the kowtow occurs.
$hypothesis$ = not the pouring Geastraceae but the roboticness happens if the barbarizing butterfat happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the axillariness occurs. sent2: if the maturing happens the pouring glomerulus occurs. sent3: the pouring glomerulus occurs if the schism happens. sent4: if the straining happens the geometricness does not occur. sent5: that the pouring Breuer occurs and the anti-semiticness occurs prevents that the immiscibleness happens. sent6: the roboticness occurs. sent7: if the avirulentness occurs then the deconstructionistness does not occur but the fundamentals occurs. sent8: that the barbarizing butterfat happens is prevented by that the pouring glomerulus occurs and the pouring Geastraceae happens. sent9: that the barbarizing butterfat does not occur is prevented by that the pouring glomerulus and the pouring Geastraceae happens. sent10: the fact that the Scandinavian happens is not wrong. sent11: the fact that the fact that the roboticness happens and the barbarizing butterfat does not occur is not false is wrong if the geometricness does not occur. sent12: that the blunting happens prevents that the equation does not occur. sent13: the uplink and the retrieval happens. sent14: either the maturing happens or the schism happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the pouring glomerulus happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pouring Geastraceae occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the pouring glomerulus occurs and the pouring Geastraceae occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the barbarizing butterfat does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barbarizing butterfat occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the pouring Geastraceae does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the pouring Geastraceae does not occur and the roboticness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__