the telpherage is not a kind of a solitaire.
sent1: there is something such that it does not minstrel Sarawak. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a Venice. sent3: if there exists something such that it does not minstrel Sarawak the fact that the shepherd is not a kind of a bundle and minstrels take-in does not hold. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does minstrel take-in and is a kind of a solitaire does not hold. sent5: the Bunsen is not antagonistic. sent6: if the fact that the shepherd is a solitaire and it does minstrel Sarawak is not right then the fact that the telpherage is not a solitaire is not false. sent7: there exists something such that it is a solitaire. sent8: that the Bunsen expires fir and is not an egret is not true if the fact that it is not antagonistic is true. sent9: if something is a easygoingness then that it does not combine and it does collogue deviltry is incorrect. sent10: that the luthier is non-raptorial thing that does collogue retention is not true. sent11: if there exists something such that it bundles then the telpherage is a solitaire. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not minstrel Sarawak the fact that the shepherd does bundle and it minstrels take-in does not hold. sent13: if the Capetian does not minstrel take-in then the shepherd is not a bundle. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a bundle that is a solitaire does not hold. sent15: if there is something such that that it is not a bundle and minstrels take-in does not hold then the telpherage is a solitaire. sent16: if that something does expire fir and is not an egret is not true it does not expire fir. sent17: the telpherage minstrels take-in. sent18: if the Bunsen does not expire fir then the Bahamian does exceed and it is a easygoingness. sent19: something either does not minstrel take-in or does not bundle or both if the fact that it does combine hold. sent20: something does not bundle and minstrels take-in. sent21: the protagonist minstrels take-in. sent22: the Capetian does combine if that the Bahamian is not a combine but it collogues deviltry is not right.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: that the shepherd is not a bundle but it minstrels take-in is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not a bundle and minstrels take-in is not right.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
that the telpherage is not a solitaire hold.
sent19 -> int3: if the Capetian is a combine then either it does not minstrel take-in or it does not bundle or both.; sent9 -> int4: if the Bahamian is a kind of a easygoingness that it does not combine and collogues deviltry is false.; sent16 -> int5: the fact that if the fact that the Bunsen does expire fir but it is not the egret is not correct the Bunsen does not expire fir is not incorrect.; sent8 & sent5 -> int6: that the Bunsen does expire fir and is not an egret is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Bunsen does not expire fir.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the Bahamian does exceed and is a kind of a easygoingness.; int8 -> int9: the Bahamian is a easygoingness.; int4 & int9 -> int10: that the Bahamian does not combine but it does collogue deviltry is not correct.; sent22 & int10 -> int11: the Capetian is a kind of a combine.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the Capetian does not minstrel take-in or it is not a bundle or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the telpherage is not a kind of a solitaire. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does not minstrel Sarawak. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a Venice. sent3: if there exists something such that it does not minstrel Sarawak the fact that the shepherd is not a kind of a bundle and minstrels take-in does not hold. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does minstrel take-in and is a kind of a solitaire does not hold. sent5: the Bunsen is not antagonistic. sent6: if the fact that the shepherd is a solitaire and it does minstrel Sarawak is not right then the fact that the telpherage is not a solitaire is not false. sent7: there exists something such that it is a solitaire. sent8: that the Bunsen expires fir and is not an egret is not true if the fact that it is not antagonistic is true. sent9: if something is a easygoingness then that it does not combine and it does collogue deviltry is incorrect. sent10: that the luthier is non-raptorial thing that does collogue retention is not true. sent11: if there exists something such that it bundles then the telpherage is a solitaire. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not minstrel Sarawak the fact that the shepherd does bundle and it minstrels take-in does not hold. sent13: if the Capetian does not minstrel take-in then the shepherd is not a bundle. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a bundle that is a solitaire does not hold. sent15: if there is something such that that it is not a bundle and minstrels take-in does not hold then the telpherage is a solitaire. sent16: if that something does expire fir and is not an egret is not true it does not expire fir. sent17: the telpherage minstrels take-in. sent18: if the Bunsen does not expire fir then the Bahamian does exceed and it is a easygoingness. sent19: something either does not minstrel take-in or does not bundle or both if the fact that it does combine hold. sent20: something does not bundle and minstrels take-in. sent21: the protagonist minstrels take-in. sent22: the Capetian does combine if that the Bahamian is not a combine but it collogues deviltry is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: that the shepherd is not a bundle but it minstrels take-in is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not a bundle and minstrels take-in is not right.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__