that something is a kind of impious thing that does think didacticism is wrong.
sent1: everything posts Kurd and is ctenoid. sent2: the locknut does think didacticism if the buzzer does think didacticism. sent3: something is not impious and does concentrate if it is Alpine. sent4: there exists something such that that it is not Alpine and it is a kind of a Southwestern is false. sent5: the buzzer is a kind of a crabgrass. sent6: something does think didacticism and is Alpine. sent7: if the half-moon does think didacticism then the locknut think didacticism. sent8: the buzzer is not a antifeminist. sent9: there exists something such that it posts Persian. sent10: the fact that the buzzer is not a kind of a Southwestern hold. sent11: if the buzzer is ctenoid then the fact that it is not a kind of a Southwestern and it does not unclothe is false. sent12: that the half-moon is not a kind of a concentrated and thinks didacticism is not true if there is something such that it is a Southwestern. sent13: the buzzer does think didacticism and it is Alpine if it is not a Southwestern. sent14: the mastaba thinks didacticism or it does not post Persian or both if the fact that the half-moon is not a kind of a antifeminist is not false. sent15: the locknut is impious if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a antifeminist and it is a concentrated is false. sent16: if the locknut is Alpine then the buzzer is Alpine. sent17: if there is something such that it does post Persian the fact that the half-moon is not a kind of a antifeminist but it is a concentrated is not true. sent18: if the locknut is not impious but a concentrated the half-moon is not a antifeminist. sent19: something thinks didacticism if it thinks didacticism or it does not post Persian or both. sent20: the buzzer is Alpine if it is not a kind of a Southwestern.
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: that the half-moon is not a antifeminist and concentrates is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a antifeminist and it is a kind of a concentrated does not hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the locknut is impious.; sent13 & sent10 -> int4: the buzzer does think didacticism and is Alpine.; int4 -> int5: the buzzer does think didacticism.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the locknut thinks didacticism.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the locknut is impious thing that thinks didacticism.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the mastaba thinks didacticism.
sent19 -> int8: the mastaba thinks didacticism if it either thinks didacticism or does not post Persian or both.; sent3 -> int9: the locknut is a kind of non-impious thing that does concentrate if the fact that it is Alpine hold.; sent1 -> int10: the buzzer does post Kurd and it is ctenoid.; int10 -> int11: the buzzer is ctenoid.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: that the buzzer is not a Southwestern and it does not unclothe does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is not a Southwestern and does not unclothe is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is a kind of impious thing that does think didacticism is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: everything posts Kurd and is ctenoid. sent2: the locknut does think didacticism if the buzzer does think didacticism. sent3: something is not impious and does concentrate if it is Alpine. sent4: there exists something such that that it is not Alpine and it is a kind of a Southwestern is false. sent5: the buzzer is a kind of a crabgrass. sent6: something does think didacticism and is Alpine. sent7: if the half-moon does think didacticism then the locknut think didacticism. sent8: the buzzer is not a antifeminist. sent9: there exists something such that it posts Persian. sent10: the fact that the buzzer is not a kind of a Southwestern hold. sent11: if the buzzer is ctenoid then the fact that it is not a kind of a Southwestern and it does not unclothe is false. sent12: that the half-moon is not a kind of a concentrated and thinks didacticism is not true if there is something such that it is a Southwestern. sent13: the buzzer does think didacticism and it is Alpine if it is not a Southwestern. sent14: the mastaba thinks didacticism or it does not post Persian or both if the fact that the half-moon is not a kind of a antifeminist is not false. sent15: the locknut is impious if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a antifeminist and it is a concentrated is false. sent16: if the locknut is Alpine then the buzzer is Alpine. sent17: if there is something such that it does post Persian the fact that the half-moon is not a kind of a antifeminist but it is a concentrated is not true. sent18: if the locknut is not impious but a concentrated the half-moon is not a antifeminist. sent19: something thinks didacticism if it thinks didacticism or it does not post Persian or both. sent20: the buzzer is Alpine if it is not a kind of a Southwestern. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: that the half-moon is not a antifeminist and concentrates is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a antifeminist and it is a kind of a concentrated does not hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the locknut is impious.; sent13 & sent10 -> int4: the buzzer does think didacticism and is Alpine.; int4 -> int5: the buzzer does think didacticism.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the locknut thinks didacticism.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the locknut is impious thing that thinks didacticism.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__