the fact that that the pestle does not occur leads to that the contemptibleness does not occur or that the stacks occurs or both is not right.
sent1: that the contemptibleness does not occur and the pestle does not occur is not right if the stacking does not occur. sent2: the contemptibleness or the stacking or both happens if the pestle does not occur. sent3: if the anisogamicness occurs the fact that the lurching quartzite happens and the verdict does not occur is wrong. sent4: if the pestle happens either the contemptibleness does not occur or the stacks happens or both. sent5: the non-hieraticness triggers that the coping picturesqueness does not occur or the fugalness occurs or both. sent6: the poeticsness does not occur if the fact that the contemptibleness does not occur and the pestling does not occur is false. sent7: that the caroling Antoninus does not occur or the elocutionariness happens or both is caused by that the ventilatoriness does not occur. sent8: the contemptibleness and/or the stacking occurs. sent9: if that the lurching quartzite but not the verdict happens is incorrect then the stacking does not occur. sent10: if the omnivorousness does not occur the Jamaican does not occur and/or the alikeness happens. sent11: the anisogamicness and the interception happens if the Jamaican does not occur. sent12: the lurching simultaneity happens. sent13: that the pestling happens is brought about by that the contemptibleness happens. sent14: the non-politicsness and/or that the incongruentness occurs is triggered by that the freeing does not occur. sent15: the non-littoralness and/or the gastrointestinalness happens if the fingerprinting does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the contemptibleness occurs.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the pestling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pestle does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the contemptibleness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the contemptibleness does not occur and/or the stacking occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the poeticsness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the pestle does not occur leads to that the contemptibleness does not occur or that the stacks occurs or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the contemptibleness does not occur and the pestle does not occur is not right if the stacking does not occur. sent2: the contemptibleness or the stacking or both happens if the pestle does not occur. sent3: if the anisogamicness occurs the fact that the lurching quartzite happens and the verdict does not occur is wrong. sent4: if the pestle happens either the contemptibleness does not occur or the stacks happens or both. sent5: the non-hieraticness triggers that the coping picturesqueness does not occur or the fugalness occurs or both. sent6: the poeticsness does not occur if the fact that the contemptibleness does not occur and the pestling does not occur is false. sent7: that the caroling Antoninus does not occur or the elocutionariness happens or both is caused by that the ventilatoriness does not occur. sent8: the contemptibleness and/or the stacking occurs. sent9: if that the lurching quartzite but not the verdict happens is incorrect then the stacking does not occur. sent10: if the omnivorousness does not occur the Jamaican does not occur and/or the alikeness happens. sent11: the anisogamicness and the interception happens if the Jamaican does not occur. sent12: the lurching simultaneity happens. sent13: that the pestling happens is brought about by that the contemptibleness happens. sent14: the non-politicsness and/or that the incongruentness occurs is triggered by that the freeing does not occur. sent15: the non-littoralness and/or the gastrointestinalness happens if the fingerprinting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the contemptibleness occurs.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the pestling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pestle does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the contemptibleness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the contemptibleness does not occur and/or the stacking occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__