the gadgetry is lawful.
sent1: there is something such that it is faucal. sent2: if there is something such that it is not faucal then that the unknown is antitypic but it is not a Narthecium is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that it is not faucal. sent4: that the unknown is not non-antitypic and it is a Narthecium does not hold if something is not faucal. sent5: if the fact that the unknown is antitypic but it is not a kind of a Narthecium is not right that the gadgetry does besiege sickbay is correct. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Narthecium. sent7: that the unknown is antitypic and is a Narthecium is false. sent8: if the unknown is a Narthecium the fact that the gadgetry besieges sickbay is true.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the unknown is antitypic thing that is not a Narthecium is not false is not correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the gadgetry besieges sickbay.;
$hypothesis$ = the gadgetry is lawful. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is faucal. sent2: if there is something such that it is not faucal then that the unknown is antitypic but it is not a Narthecium is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that it is not faucal. sent4: that the unknown is not non-antitypic and it is a Narthecium does not hold if something is not faucal. sent5: if the fact that the unknown is antitypic but it is not a kind of a Narthecium is not right that the gadgetry does besiege sickbay is correct. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Narthecium. sent7: that the unknown is antitypic and is a Narthecium is false. sent8: if the unknown is a Narthecium the fact that the gadgetry besieges sickbay is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the unknown is antitypic thing that is not a Narthecium is not false is not correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the gadgetry besieges sickbay.; __UNKNOWN__