the barbasco is a Exocet.
sent1: the microfiche is a Lithospermum. sent2: if the fact that something is a foster-son but it is not a chemiluminescence does not hold it is not manageable. sent3: the fact that the microfiche is not a kind of a chemiluminescence hold. sent4: if the extremist is both not operationalist and not manageable the barbasco is a kind of a Exocet. sent5: the extremist is not operationalist if the cambium is a Gresham and a buzz. sent6: if the extremist is cockney then that it is a foster-son that is not a chemiluminescence is not true. sent7: the cambium does not outgeneral Francophobe. sent8: the extremist is a cockney. sent9: the cambium is parametric if the microfiche does phrase. sent10: the cambium is a Gresham if it is parametric. sent11: if there is something such that that it is a chemiluminescence is not wrong the extremist buzzes. sent12: the quitter is a Exocet if it is hateful. sent13: the extremist is not a buzz. sent14: the microfiche is a Lithospermum and is a phrasing if something does billow Andromeda. sent15: the fact that the extremist is a kind of a foster-son and it is a chemiluminescence is not true. sent16: the cambium is a kind of a buzz.
sent2 -> int1: if that that the extremist is a kind of a foster-son and is not a kind of a chemiluminescence is false is not wrong it is not manageable.; sent6 & sent8 -> int2: that the extremist is a kind of a foster-son but it is not a chemiluminescence is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the extremist is not manageable.;
$hypothesis$ = the barbasco is a Exocet. ; $context$ = sent1: the microfiche is a Lithospermum. sent2: if the fact that something is a foster-son but it is not a chemiluminescence does not hold it is not manageable. sent3: the fact that the microfiche is not a kind of a chemiluminescence hold. sent4: if the extremist is both not operationalist and not manageable the barbasco is a kind of a Exocet. sent5: the extremist is not operationalist if the cambium is a Gresham and a buzz. sent6: if the extremist is cockney then that it is a foster-son that is not a chemiluminescence is not true. sent7: the cambium does not outgeneral Francophobe. sent8: the extremist is a cockney. sent9: the cambium is parametric if the microfiche does phrase. sent10: the cambium is a Gresham if it is parametric. sent11: if there is something such that that it is a chemiluminescence is not wrong the extremist buzzes. sent12: the quitter is a Exocet if it is hateful. sent13: the extremist is not a buzz. sent14: the microfiche is a Lithospermum and is a phrasing if something does billow Andromeda. sent15: the fact that the extremist is a kind of a foster-son and it is a chemiluminescence is not true. sent16: the cambium is a kind of a buzz. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if that that the extremist is a kind of a foster-son and is not a kind of a chemiluminescence is false is not wrong it is not manageable.; sent6 & sent8 -> int2: that the extremist is a kind of a foster-son but it is not a chemiluminescence is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the extremist is not manageable.; __UNKNOWN__