that there is something such that if it empties RUF then it is not experiential or it does empty transmogrification or both is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the chloropicrin either does not empty RUF or empties peer or both is true if it consolidates chloropicrin. sent2: if the fact that the tam empties RUF is true it is experiential and/or empties transmogrification. sent3: if the tam does empty RUF the fact that it is not experiential and/or empties transmogrification is right. sent4: that the tam is either not experiential or a love or both hold if it does consolidate abvolt. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a disembarrassment then it is not Slavonic and/or sniffs intermittence. sent6: there exists something such that if it does empty RUF then it is experiential and/or it does empty transmogrification. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a teleportation then it is not precancerous and/or consolidates Raskolnikov. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a mane it is not a kind of a monkfish or it inflates or both. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if it is defervescent then it is not a Soubise and/or does sniff tam is not false. sent10: something is not a catalase or is a Passover or both if it is a night-line.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a night-line it is not a catalase or it is a Passover or both.
sent10 -> int1: either the inductor is not a kind of a catalase or it is a kind of a Passover or both if it is a night-line.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it empties RUF then it is not experiential or it does empty transmogrification or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the chloropicrin either does not empty RUF or empties peer or both is true if it consolidates chloropicrin. sent2: if the fact that the tam empties RUF is true it is experiential and/or empties transmogrification. sent3: if the tam does empty RUF the fact that it is not experiential and/or empties transmogrification is right. sent4: that the tam is either not experiential or a love or both hold if it does consolidate abvolt. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a disembarrassment then it is not Slavonic and/or sniffs intermittence. sent6: there exists something such that if it does empty RUF then it is experiential and/or it does empty transmogrification. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a teleportation then it is not precancerous and/or consolidates Raskolnikov. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a mane it is not a kind of a monkfish or it inflates or both. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if it is defervescent then it is not a Soubise and/or does sniff tam is not false. sent10: something is not a catalase or is a Passover or both if it is a night-line. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__