that if the liliaceousness occurs the Phoenician does not occur and the chucking does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: that the forecasting Theravada does not occur and the establishing does not occur is caused by that the yoke occurs. sent2: that both the morticing logjam and the chuck happens prevents that the liliaceousness occurs. sent3: the monoeciousness occurs. sent4: the crosstalk does not occur. sent5: the Phoenicianness does not occur. sent6: if the morticing logjam and the chucking happens the liliaceousness happens. sent7: the departure occurs if the fact that the forecasting glyph happens hold. sent8: that the morticing logjam happens is correct if the painfulness happens. sent9: that the morticing logjam happens is caused by that the crusting Saurosuchus happens. sent10: the crusting Saurosuchus occurs and/or the painfulness happens.
sent10 & sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the morticing logjam occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the chucking happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the morticing logjam and the chuck happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the liliaceousness does not occur is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the liliaceousness happens is true.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the chucking does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the Phoenician does not occur and the chucking does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the liliaceousness occurs the Phoenician does not occur and the chucking does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the forecasting Theravada does not occur and the establishing does not occur is caused by that the yoke occurs. sent2: that both the morticing logjam and the chuck happens prevents that the liliaceousness occurs. sent3: the monoeciousness occurs. sent4: the crosstalk does not occur. sent5: the Phoenicianness does not occur. sent6: if the morticing logjam and the chucking happens the liliaceousness happens. sent7: the departure occurs if the fact that the forecasting glyph happens hold. sent8: that the morticing logjam happens is correct if the painfulness happens. sent9: that the morticing logjam happens is caused by that the crusting Saurosuchus happens. sent10: the crusting Saurosuchus occurs and/or the painfulness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the morticing logjam occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the chucking happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the morticing logjam and the chuck happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the liliaceousness does not occur is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the liliaceousness happens is true.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the chucking does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the Phoenician does not occur and the chucking does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__