the toxin is not a kind of a metallic.
sent1: the kohlrabi is not a bray if either the interoceptor is a kind of a bray or it is adventuristic or both. sent2: the interoceptor does horn interoceptor. sent3: the interoceptor is manly and/or it unclothes liquidator. sent4: the toxin does desquamate. sent5: if the toxin does not unclothe liquidator then that the kohlrabi does not unclothe Melpomene and/or it does embrown Serkin is wrong. sent6: there is something such that it does horn interoceptor and it is not nonfunctional. sent7: the interoceptor is adventuristic if there exists something such that it horns interoceptor and is not nonfunctional. sent8: if the toxin is a kind of a Villard and/or it does not desquamate then it does not unclothe liquidator. sent9: something is not a metallic if the fact that that it is a kind of a Villard and/or it does not desquamate is not wrong does not hold. sent10: something is a bray if that it does not unclothe Melpomene and/or it embrowns Serkin is not true. sent11: the kohlrabi does not stow menorah if it does desquamate. sent12: if the fact that the kohlrabi does desquamate and/or unclothes Melpomene is false it does embrown Serkin.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toxin is a kind of a Villard or it does not desquamate or both.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the toxin does not unclothe liquidator is not incorrect.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the kohlrabi does not unclothe Melpomene or it embrowns Serkin or both is not true.; sent10 -> int3: the kohlrabi is a bray if that either it does not unclothe Melpomene or it does embrown Serkin or both is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the kohlrabi does bray is not wrong.; sent6 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the interoceptor is adventuristic is true.; int5 -> int6: the interoceptor is a bray and/or adventuristic.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the kohlrabi is not a bray.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the fact that the toxin is a kind of a Villard or does not desquamate or both is not correct is true.; sent9 -> int10: the toxin is not a metallic if the fact that it either is a Villard or does not desquamate or both does not hold.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the toxin is not a kind of a metallic. ; $context$ = sent1: the kohlrabi is not a bray if either the interoceptor is a kind of a bray or it is adventuristic or both. sent2: the interoceptor does horn interoceptor. sent3: the interoceptor is manly and/or it unclothes liquidator. sent4: the toxin does desquamate. sent5: if the toxin does not unclothe liquidator then that the kohlrabi does not unclothe Melpomene and/or it does embrown Serkin is wrong. sent6: there is something such that it does horn interoceptor and it is not nonfunctional. sent7: the interoceptor is adventuristic if there exists something such that it horns interoceptor and is not nonfunctional. sent8: if the toxin is a kind of a Villard and/or it does not desquamate then it does not unclothe liquidator. sent9: something is not a metallic if the fact that that it is a kind of a Villard and/or it does not desquamate is not wrong does not hold. sent10: something is a bray if that it does not unclothe Melpomene and/or it embrowns Serkin is not true. sent11: the kohlrabi does not stow menorah if it does desquamate. sent12: if the fact that the kohlrabi does desquamate and/or unclothes Melpomene is false it does embrown Serkin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toxin is a kind of a Villard or it does not desquamate or both.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the toxin does not unclothe liquidator is not incorrect.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the kohlrabi does not unclothe Melpomene or it embrowns Serkin or both is not true.; sent10 -> int3: the kohlrabi is a bray if that either it does not unclothe Melpomene or it does embrown Serkin or both is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the kohlrabi does bray is not wrong.; sent6 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the interoceptor is adventuristic is true.; int5 -> int6: the interoceptor is a bray and/or adventuristic.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the kohlrabi is not a bray.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the fact that the toxin is a kind of a Villard or does not desquamate or both is not correct is true.; sent9 -> int10: the toxin is not a metallic if the fact that it either is a Villard or does not desquamate or both does not hold.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__