the Basque factors and it concretizes hexagon if that the exonuclease is not an expressionist hold.
sent1: if something is non-expressionist that it does not eat or it is not skinned or both is not correct. sent2: that the Basque is a mosquitofish and it is hematopoietic does not hold. sent3: that the Basque is a kind of a mosquitofish and it is hematopoietic is incorrect if there is something such that it is incidental. sent4: the Basque is a kind of a factor that does concretize hexagon if the exonuclease is an expressionist. sent5: something that is a mosquitofish concretizes hexagon. sent6: if something does not factor that it is either not expressionist or a Yazoo or both is incorrect. sent7: if the fact that something is not a mosquitofish but it is hematopoietic does not hold then it is a mosquitofish. sent8: if the exonuclease does not concretize hexagon the Basque is a mosquitofish and is skinless. sent9: if the fact that the defeatist does not descry impiety is not incorrect then the fact that it is a Veneto and it is a kind of a treenail is false. sent10: if the fact that the defeatist is a kind of a Veneto and it is a treenail does not hold it is not a Gaul. sent11: that something does not eat or is not skinned or both does not hold if it is an expressionist. sent12: something is a Chemakuan if it is a kind of a brokerage. sent13: the Thunderer is not a factor if something that does not concretize hexagon is a kind of a mosquitofish. sent14: the Basque factors if that the exonuclease either does not eat or is skinless or both is false. sent15: something does eat if it is not an expressionist. sent16: the exonuclease does eat if it is not an expressionist. sent17: there exists something such that it is an incidental. sent18: if the fact that the frill is not incidental and not non-hematopoietic is not right then the Basque is a kind of an incidental. sent19: that the defeatist does not descry impiety is right.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that that the exonuclease does not eat and/or is skinless is correct is incorrect if it is non-expressionist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the exonuclease is not an expressionist is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the exonuclease does not eat and/or it is skinless is wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Basque is a kind of a factor.; sent5 -> int4: the Basque does concretize hexagon if it is a kind of a mosquitofish.; sent7 -> int5: the Basque is a kind of a mosquitofish if the fact that it is not a kind of a mosquitofish and is hematopoietic is incorrect.;
that the Thunderer either is not an expressionist or is a Yazoo or both does not hold.
sent6 -> int6: that the Thunderer is not a kind of an expressionist and/or is a kind of a Yazoo is wrong if it is not a factor.; sent9 & sent19 -> int7: that the defeatist is a Veneto and a treenail is not true.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the defeatist is not a kind of a Gaul.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a Gaul.;
$hypothesis$ = the Basque factors and it concretizes hexagon if that the exonuclease is not an expressionist hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is non-expressionist that it does not eat or it is not skinned or both is not correct. sent2: that the Basque is a mosquitofish and it is hematopoietic does not hold. sent3: that the Basque is a kind of a mosquitofish and it is hematopoietic is incorrect if there is something such that it is incidental. sent4: the Basque is a kind of a factor that does concretize hexagon if the exonuclease is an expressionist. sent5: something that is a mosquitofish concretizes hexagon. sent6: if something does not factor that it is either not expressionist or a Yazoo or both is incorrect. sent7: if the fact that something is not a mosquitofish but it is hematopoietic does not hold then it is a mosquitofish. sent8: if the exonuclease does not concretize hexagon the Basque is a mosquitofish and is skinless. sent9: if the fact that the defeatist does not descry impiety is not incorrect then the fact that it is a Veneto and it is a kind of a treenail is false. sent10: if the fact that the defeatist is a kind of a Veneto and it is a treenail does not hold it is not a Gaul. sent11: that something does not eat or is not skinned or both does not hold if it is an expressionist. sent12: something is a Chemakuan if it is a kind of a brokerage. sent13: the Thunderer is not a factor if something that does not concretize hexagon is a kind of a mosquitofish. sent14: the Basque factors if that the exonuclease either does not eat or is skinless or both is false. sent15: something does eat if it is not an expressionist. sent16: the exonuclease does eat if it is not an expressionist. sent17: there exists something such that it is an incidental. sent18: if the fact that the frill is not incidental and not non-hematopoietic is not right then the Basque is a kind of an incidental. sent19: that the defeatist does not descry impiety is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that that the exonuclease does not eat and/or is skinless is correct is incorrect if it is non-expressionist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the exonuclease is not an expressionist is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the exonuclease does not eat and/or it is skinless is wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Basque is a kind of a factor.; sent5 -> int4: the Basque does concretize hexagon if it is a kind of a mosquitofish.; sent7 -> int5: the Basque is a kind of a mosquitofish if the fact that it is not a kind of a mosquitofish and is hematopoietic is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__