the ruddles does drowse and it blinkers strafer if it is not a frosting.
sent1: if the ruddles does not blinker strafer the piggery is a kind of a narcotic. sent2: either everything farms piggery or it is annexational or both. sent3: if the bluegrass is narcotic then the ruddles drowses. sent4: the ruddles does drowse and blinkers strafer if it does frost. sent5: the ruddles does not blinker strafer if the bluegrass does not blinker strafer and/or it is a frosting. sent6: if that the fact that something is a kind of semi-tuberous thing that is not a grating is true is incorrect then it blinkers strafer. sent7: if the bluegrass is a grating the ruddles does drowse. sent8: the fact that the ruddles grates is true if that the bluegrass grates is not false. sent9: if the fact that the bluegrass blinkers strafer and is not a grating is false then it does drowse. sent10: either the bluegrass knots sedum or it is a Gothic or both. sent11: if the bluegrass is irreplaceable and not joyful it does astrogate. sent12: if something does frost then it does not blinker strafer and it does drowse. sent13: the ruddles blinkers strafer if it is not semi-tuberous. sent14: if the ruddles is semi-tuberous but it does not grate it is a frosting. sent15: everything does drowse or it is a kind of a narcotic or both. sent16: a non-semi-tuberous thing does blinker strafer. sent17: the bluegrass is not a kind of a frosting. sent18: the fact that the ruddles is a narcotic is correct if the bluegrass is a kind of a narcotic. sent19: the ruddles is semi-tuberous. sent20: the bluegrass does not blinker strafer if the Dacron drowses and does not farm soled. sent21: that the ruddles does drowse is right if the bluegrass drowse. sent22: something drowses if that it does blinker strafer and is not a frosting is incorrect. sent23: the sedum is non-narcotic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ruddles is semi-tuberous and not a grating.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the ruddles does frost.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the ruddles is not a kind of a frosting is right.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ruddles is semi-tuberous and is not a grating is wrong.; sent6 -> int4: the ruddles blinkers strafer if the fact that it is semi-tuberous and it is not a grating is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ruddles blinkers strafer.; sent15 -> int6: that the bluegrass drowses or it is a narcotic or both is not wrong.; int6 & sent21 & sent3 -> int7: the ruddles does drowse.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the ruddles drowses and it does blinker strafer.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the strafer does drowse.
sent12 -> int9: if the strafer is a frosting it does not blinker strafer and it does drowse.;
$hypothesis$ = the ruddles does drowse and it blinkers strafer if it is not a frosting. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ruddles does not blinker strafer the piggery is a kind of a narcotic. sent2: either everything farms piggery or it is annexational or both. sent3: if the bluegrass is narcotic then the ruddles drowses. sent4: the ruddles does drowse and blinkers strafer if it does frost. sent5: the ruddles does not blinker strafer if the bluegrass does not blinker strafer and/or it is a frosting. sent6: if that the fact that something is a kind of semi-tuberous thing that is not a grating is true is incorrect then it blinkers strafer. sent7: if the bluegrass is a grating the ruddles does drowse. sent8: the fact that the ruddles grates is true if that the bluegrass grates is not false. sent9: if the fact that the bluegrass blinkers strafer and is not a grating is false then it does drowse. sent10: either the bluegrass knots sedum or it is a Gothic or both. sent11: if the bluegrass is irreplaceable and not joyful it does astrogate. sent12: if something does frost then it does not blinker strafer and it does drowse. sent13: the ruddles blinkers strafer if it is not semi-tuberous. sent14: if the ruddles is semi-tuberous but it does not grate it is a frosting. sent15: everything does drowse or it is a kind of a narcotic or both. sent16: a non-semi-tuberous thing does blinker strafer. sent17: the bluegrass is not a kind of a frosting. sent18: the fact that the ruddles is a narcotic is correct if the bluegrass is a kind of a narcotic. sent19: the ruddles is semi-tuberous. sent20: the bluegrass does not blinker strafer if the Dacron drowses and does not farm soled. sent21: that the ruddles does drowse is right if the bluegrass drowse. sent22: something drowses if that it does blinker strafer and is not a frosting is incorrect. sent23: the sedum is non-narcotic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ruddles is semi-tuberous and not a grating.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the ruddles does frost.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the ruddles is not a kind of a frosting is right.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ruddles is semi-tuberous and is not a grating is wrong.; sent6 -> int4: the ruddles blinkers strafer if the fact that it is semi-tuberous and it is not a grating is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ruddles blinkers strafer.; sent15 -> int6: that the bluegrass drowses or it is a narcotic or both is not wrong.; int6 & sent21 & sent3 -> int7: the ruddles does drowse.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the ruddles drowses and it does blinker strafer.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__