that the unimpressionableness does not occur but the waving moonlighter happens is wrong.
sent1: the Rorschach is prevented by that both the trolling hanging and the protuberating Wylie happens. sent2: the non-bizonalness is prevented by that the low-levelness occurs. sent3: the authorialness happens. sent4: the bizonalness does not occur if the fact that the translatableness happens and the bimillenialness does not occur does not hold. sent5: the fact that the translatableness and the non-bimillenialness happens is incorrect. sent6: if the protuberating Wylie does not occur the fact that that the unimpressionableness does not occur and the waving moonlighter happens is not false is false. sent7: the unimpressionableness is prevented by the divesting. sent8: the trolling hanging occurs. sent9: if the protuberating Wylie does not occur the fact that both the unimpressionableness and the waving moonlighter occurs is false. sent10: that the bimillenialness does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: that the non-marsupialness and the billing occurs does not hold if the obstruction does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the chloroticness does not occur is not incorrect the fact that the end happens and the editorship happens is not right. sent13: the fact that the translatableness happens and the bimillenialness occurs is wrong. sent14: that the unimpressionableness and the waving moonlighter happens is not true. sent15: the fact that the divesting does not occur and the low-levelness occurs if the Rorschach does not occur is not wrong. sent16: the non-Manichaeanness is prevented by that the protuberating Wylie does not occur and the trolling hanging does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the protuberating Wylie occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: both the trolling hanging and the protuberating Wylie happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Rorschach does not occur.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: not the divesting but the low-levelness occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the low-levelness happens is not wrong.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the bizonalness happens.; sent4 & sent5 -> int6: the bizonalness does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the protuberating Wylie does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
not the unimpressionableness but the waving moonlighter happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the unimpressionableness does not occur but the waving moonlighter happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Rorschach is prevented by that both the trolling hanging and the protuberating Wylie happens. sent2: the non-bizonalness is prevented by that the low-levelness occurs. sent3: the authorialness happens. sent4: the bizonalness does not occur if the fact that the translatableness happens and the bimillenialness does not occur does not hold. sent5: the fact that the translatableness and the non-bimillenialness happens is incorrect. sent6: if the protuberating Wylie does not occur the fact that that the unimpressionableness does not occur and the waving moonlighter happens is not false is false. sent7: the unimpressionableness is prevented by the divesting. sent8: the trolling hanging occurs. sent9: if the protuberating Wylie does not occur the fact that both the unimpressionableness and the waving moonlighter occurs is false. sent10: that the bimillenialness does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: that the non-marsupialness and the billing occurs does not hold if the obstruction does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the chloroticness does not occur is not incorrect the fact that the end happens and the editorship happens is not right. sent13: the fact that the translatableness happens and the bimillenialness occurs is wrong. sent14: that the unimpressionableness and the waving moonlighter happens is not true. sent15: the fact that the divesting does not occur and the low-levelness occurs if the Rorschach does not occur is not wrong. sent16: the non-Manichaeanness is prevented by that the protuberating Wylie does not occur and the trolling hanging does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the protuberating Wylie occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: both the trolling hanging and the protuberating Wylie happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Rorschach does not occur.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: not the divesting but the low-levelness occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the low-levelness happens is not wrong.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the bizonalness happens.; sent4 & sent5 -> int6: the bizonalness does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the protuberating Wylie does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__