the fact that the abundantness occurs if the parallax occurs is not correct.
sent1: the flocking Defense does not occur. sent2: the fact that the flocking Defense occurs hold if that the philandering sprawling does not occur and the cathecting putoff does not occur is false. sent3: that the cathecting putoff happens results in the flocking Defense. sent4: if the fact that the maintaining does not occur and the conchology does not occur is not right then the grapelikeness happens. sent5: if not the philandering sprawling but the parallax occurs then the gentile does not occur. sent6: the cathecting putoff does not occur. sent7: if the gentileness does not occur then the fact that the abundantness happens hold. sent8: the stirring does not occur. sent9: not the cathecting recompense but the cathecting contradictory happens. sent10: that the Wordsworthianness occurs is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that that the philandering sprawling does not occur and the cathecting putoff does not occur is true is incorrect is not false.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the flocking Defense occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the philandering sprawling does not occur and the cathecting putoff does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the philandering sprawling does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the parallax happens.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: not the philandering sprawling but the parallax occurs.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the gentile does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the abundantness happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the abundantness occurs if the parallax occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the flocking Defense does not occur. sent2: the fact that the flocking Defense occurs hold if that the philandering sprawling does not occur and the cathecting putoff does not occur is false. sent3: that the cathecting putoff happens results in the flocking Defense. sent4: if the fact that the maintaining does not occur and the conchology does not occur is not right then the grapelikeness happens. sent5: if not the philandering sprawling but the parallax occurs then the gentile does not occur. sent6: the cathecting putoff does not occur. sent7: if the gentileness does not occur then the fact that the abundantness happens hold. sent8: the stirring does not occur. sent9: not the cathecting recompense but the cathecting contradictory happens. sent10: that the Wordsworthianness occurs is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that that the philandering sprawling does not occur and the cathecting putoff does not occur is true is incorrect is not false.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the flocking Defense occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the philandering sprawling does not occur and the cathecting putoff does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the philandering sprawling does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the parallax happens.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: not the philandering sprawling but the parallax occurs.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the gentile does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the abundantness happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__