the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not crook kurrat and it is not a brouhaha is not right then it is a kind of a bankbook is not true.
sent1: the fact that if that the orrery does crook kurrat and is not the brouhaha is false the orrery is a kind of a bankbook is correct. sent2: if the fact that the kurrat is not aground and it is not a violator does not hold it is a Kafiri. sent3: if that the hydantoin is not a brouhaha and it is not a converse does not hold it is an unknown. sent4: there is something such that if it does not crook kurrat and it is not a brouhaha then it is a kind of a bankbook. sent5: something is a bankbook if the fact that it crooks kurrat and is not a kind of a brouhaha is not right. sent6: if the fact that something is not a Chomsky and is not servomechanical is wrong then it is normal. sent7: if that something is not a headshake and it is not a chinked is not right then it does intuit. sent8: the orrery is a kind of a bankbook if the fact that it is a brouhaha hold. sent9: if that something is non-endothermic thing that does not crook grouch is not correct then it is journalistic. sent10: if the fact that something is not a kind of a ready-mix and is not a kind of a jammer is false then it does contradistinguish entitlement. sent11: the orrery is a kind of a barndoor if that it is not a firetrap and does not crook kurrat is not true. sent12: the orrery is a kind of a bankbook if it does not crook kurrat and it is not a brouhaha. sent13: something is a bankbook if it is a brouhaha. sent14: if something is a question then it is a toy. sent15: if that something does not crook kurrat and is not a kind of a brouhaha is not incorrect then it is a bankbook. sent16: there is something such that if that the fact that it crooks kurrat and it is not a brouhaha is not incorrect is not correct then it is a kind of a bankbook. sent17: something does crook kurrat if the fact that it does not cancel ptyalin and it is not a creel is wrong. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a brouhaha it is a bankbook. sent19: if the fact that something does not crook kurrat and it is not a kind of a brouhaha is not right it is a bankbook. sent20: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-concretistic but not a Illyrian is false it is a creel. sent21: if the fact that the orrery is a kind of non-backhand thing that does not crook kurrat is wrong then it does satisfice.
sent19 -> int1: if that the orrery does not crook kurrat and is not a brouhaha is wrong the fact that it is a bankbook hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the fact that the CAD does not cancel ptyalin and it is not a creel is not incorrect does not hold it crooks kurrat.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not crook kurrat and it is not a brouhaha is not right then it is a kind of a bankbook is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if that the orrery does crook kurrat and is not the brouhaha is false the orrery is a kind of a bankbook is correct. sent2: if the fact that the kurrat is not aground and it is not a violator does not hold it is a Kafiri. sent3: if that the hydantoin is not a brouhaha and it is not a converse does not hold it is an unknown. sent4: there is something such that if it does not crook kurrat and it is not a brouhaha then it is a kind of a bankbook. sent5: something is a bankbook if the fact that it crooks kurrat and is not a kind of a brouhaha is not right. sent6: if the fact that something is not a Chomsky and is not servomechanical is wrong then it is normal. sent7: if that something is not a headshake and it is not a chinked is not right then it does intuit. sent8: the orrery is a kind of a bankbook if the fact that it is a brouhaha hold. sent9: if that something is non-endothermic thing that does not crook grouch is not correct then it is journalistic. sent10: if the fact that something is not a kind of a ready-mix and is not a kind of a jammer is false then it does contradistinguish entitlement. sent11: the orrery is a kind of a barndoor if that it is not a firetrap and does not crook kurrat is not true. sent12: the orrery is a kind of a bankbook if it does not crook kurrat and it is not a brouhaha. sent13: something is a bankbook if it is a brouhaha. sent14: if something is a question then it is a toy. sent15: if that something does not crook kurrat and is not a kind of a brouhaha is not incorrect then it is a bankbook. sent16: there is something such that if that the fact that it crooks kurrat and it is not a brouhaha is not incorrect is not correct then it is a kind of a bankbook. sent17: something does crook kurrat if the fact that it does not cancel ptyalin and it is not a creel is wrong. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a brouhaha it is a bankbook. sent19: if the fact that something does not crook kurrat and it is not a kind of a brouhaha is not right it is a bankbook. sent20: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-concretistic but not a Illyrian is false it is a creel. sent21: if the fact that the orrery is a kind of non-backhand thing that does not crook kurrat is wrong then it does satisfice. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: if that the orrery does not crook kurrat and is not a brouhaha is wrong the fact that it is a bankbook hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__