if the decoying pizzicato occurs then the decoying palingenesis happens.
sent1: the decoying appearance and the developing occurs. sent2: both the sterilizing peasant and the shellfire happens. sent3: the indecentness happens and the salting occurs. sent4: the salting happens. sent5: the arbitraging does not occur. sent6: the econometricness does not occur. sent7: if the decoying pizzicato happens and the sterilizing brushwood happens then the indecentness does not occur. sent8: the electrocution does not occur. sent9: the anagrammaticness happens. sent10: that the sighting happens but the auditing does not occur is wrong if the sterilizing brushwood does not occur. sent11: the decoying Scorpio happens and the decoying Wellington happens. sent12: the catalecticness occurs. sent13: the sterilizing voltage occurs. sent14: the republican occurs. sent15: the fact that both the itineration and the non-urogenitalness occurs is false. sent16: the sexualness happens. sent17: the decoying inulin occurs if the classificatoriness does not occur and the insemination occurs. sent18: the republicanness occurs if the arbitrage does not occur. sent19: the sterilizing high-low does not occur if the fact that the sighting occurs and the auditing does not occur does not hold. sent20: if not the sterilizing high-low but the trajectory occurs the decoying palingenesis happens. sent21: that the sighting does not occur leads to that the sterilizing high-low does not occur. sent22: both the non-Mauritanianness and the scheduling occurs. sent23: the fact that the sterilizing abduction happens and the catalecticness does not occur does not hold. sent24: the sterilizing nummulite does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decoying pizzicato occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sterilizing brushwood occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the decoying pizzicato occurs and the sterilizing brushwood happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the indecentness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the indecentness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sterilizing brushwood does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: that the sighting happens but the audit does not occur is wrong.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the sterilizing high-low does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = if the decoying pizzicato occurs then the decoying palingenesis happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the decoying appearance and the developing occurs. sent2: both the sterilizing peasant and the shellfire happens. sent3: the indecentness happens and the salting occurs. sent4: the salting happens. sent5: the arbitraging does not occur. sent6: the econometricness does not occur. sent7: if the decoying pizzicato happens and the sterilizing brushwood happens then the indecentness does not occur. sent8: the electrocution does not occur. sent9: the anagrammaticness happens. sent10: that the sighting happens but the auditing does not occur is wrong if the sterilizing brushwood does not occur. sent11: the decoying Scorpio happens and the decoying Wellington happens. sent12: the catalecticness occurs. sent13: the sterilizing voltage occurs. sent14: the republican occurs. sent15: the fact that both the itineration and the non-urogenitalness occurs is false. sent16: the sexualness happens. sent17: the decoying inulin occurs if the classificatoriness does not occur and the insemination occurs. sent18: the republicanness occurs if the arbitrage does not occur. sent19: the sterilizing high-low does not occur if the fact that the sighting occurs and the auditing does not occur does not hold. sent20: if not the sterilizing high-low but the trajectory occurs the decoying palingenesis happens. sent21: that the sighting does not occur leads to that the sterilizing high-low does not occur. sent22: both the non-Mauritanianness and the scheduling occurs. sent23: the fact that the sterilizing abduction happens and the catalecticness does not occur does not hold. sent24: the sterilizing nummulite does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decoying pizzicato occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sterilizing brushwood occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the decoying pizzicato occurs and the sterilizing brushwood happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the indecentness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the indecentness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sterilizing brushwood does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: that the sighting happens but the audit does not occur is wrong.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the sterilizing high-low does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__