the brit is not a kind of a pitching.
sent1: if something is unlikable the fact that the Hawaiian is a kind of a flat that is sessile is not correct. sent2: that the patio is a kind of sessile thing that is a kind of a flat is not correct. sent3: if something is sessile and/or it is not hairless then it is a kind of a mandatary. sent4: if the fact that the fact that the Hawaiian does not weave CD8 and is unadaptable is false is not wrong it is not hexangular. sent5: that something is a Rickover and it is hexangular if it is not a stop is not false. sent6: that the patio is sessile thing that is not a kind of a flat is false if that the strudel is a flat hold. sent7: the strudel is a flat if it is not a kind of a Rickover. sent8: a Rickover pitches. sent9: if the patio does cozen beech the strudel is unlikable. sent10: if the strudel is flat the fact that the patio is sessile and is flat is not true. sent11: if that the patio does weave spelldown hold the strudel is unlikable. sent12: the patio does not weave scuffle. sent13: that the patio is not unadaptable but sessile is not correct. sent14: if something is not hexangular then it is a kind of a Rickover. sent15: if the fact that the patio is a flat is correct the brit is not a pitching. sent16: either something weaves spelldown or it does cozen beech or both if it does not weave scuffle. sent17: something is a kind of a flat if it is not a Rickover. sent18: either the strudel does stop or it is a kind of a Rickover or both. sent19: if something is a stop and/or not a Rickover then it is not non-flat. sent20: that the Hawaiian does not weave CD8 but it is unadaptable is incorrect. sent21: the strudel stops and/or it is not a Rickover if the Hawaiian is a Rickover. sent22: the fact that the strudel does stop or it is a Rickover or both if the Hawaiian is a kind of a Rickover hold. sent23: the fact that the strudel is unadaptable but it is not a kind of a Rickover is not true if the Hawaiian is a Rickover. sent24: if the Hawaiian is not unadaptable then it is not hexangular.
sent4 & sent20 -> int1: the Hawaiian is non-hexangular.; sent14 -> int2: if the Hawaiian is not hexangular it is a kind of a Rickover.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Hawaiian is a kind of a Rickover.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the strudel is a kind of a stop and/or is not a kind of a Rickover.; sent19 -> int5: that if the strudel is a stop or it is not a kind of the Rickover or both then the strudel is a flat is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the strudel is a flat.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the patio is sessile and is not a flat is wrong.;
that if the monstrosity is sessile or is not hairless or both then the monstrosity is a mandatary is not false.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the brit is not a kind of a pitching. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is unlikable the fact that the Hawaiian is a kind of a flat that is sessile is not correct. sent2: that the patio is a kind of sessile thing that is a kind of a flat is not correct. sent3: if something is sessile and/or it is not hairless then it is a kind of a mandatary. sent4: if the fact that the fact that the Hawaiian does not weave CD8 and is unadaptable is false is not wrong it is not hexangular. sent5: that something is a Rickover and it is hexangular if it is not a stop is not false. sent6: that the patio is sessile thing that is not a kind of a flat is false if that the strudel is a flat hold. sent7: the strudel is a flat if it is not a kind of a Rickover. sent8: a Rickover pitches. sent9: if the patio does cozen beech the strudel is unlikable. sent10: if the strudel is flat the fact that the patio is sessile and is flat is not true. sent11: if that the patio does weave spelldown hold the strudel is unlikable. sent12: the patio does not weave scuffle. sent13: that the patio is not unadaptable but sessile is not correct. sent14: if something is not hexangular then it is a kind of a Rickover. sent15: if the fact that the patio is a flat is correct the brit is not a pitching. sent16: either something weaves spelldown or it does cozen beech or both if it does not weave scuffle. sent17: something is a kind of a flat if it is not a Rickover. sent18: either the strudel does stop or it is a kind of a Rickover or both. sent19: if something is a stop and/or not a Rickover then it is not non-flat. sent20: that the Hawaiian does not weave CD8 but it is unadaptable is incorrect. sent21: the strudel stops and/or it is not a Rickover if the Hawaiian is a Rickover. sent22: the fact that the strudel does stop or it is a Rickover or both if the Hawaiian is a kind of a Rickover hold. sent23: the fact that the strudel is unadaptable but it is not a kind of a Rickover is not true if the Hawaiian is a Rickover. sent24: if the Hawaiian is not unadaptable then it is not hexangular. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent20 -> int1: the Hawaiian is non-hexangular.; sent14 -> int2: if the Hawaiian is not hexangular it is a kind of a Rickover.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Hawaiian is a kind of a Rickover.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the strudel is a kind of a stop and/or is not a kind of a Rickover.; sent19 -> int5: that if the strudel is a stop or it is not a kind of the Rickover or both then the strudel is a flat is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the strudel is a flat.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the patio is sessile and is not a flat is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__