that the Proustianness occurs is caused by the rustling.
sent1: the taming etcher does not occur if that the taming etcher and the non-impartialness occurs is incorrect. sent2: if the fresco happens then the plating occurs. sent3: the fact that the dinging Lentinus does not occur hold if the fact that the Proustianness occurs and the rustling happens does not hold. sent4: if the mutter does not occur then both the ESM and the fresco happens. sent5: the fact that that the taming serger and the leaning occurs hold is wrong if the Proustianness does not occur. sent6: that the papalness does not occur is prevented by that the non-Proustianness and the rustling happens. sent7: if the chimericness does not occur then the bolographicness does not occur and the incommensurateness happens. sent8: the murmuring clinker does not occur if the shrinking liveliness does not occur. sent9: the chimericness does not occur and the shrinking property does not occur if the taming etcher does not occur. sent10: the frescoing does not occur. sent11: the unservileness occurs. sent12: that the taming etcher but not the impartialness occurs does not hold if the plating occurs. sent13: that the optometry and the sanitation occurs is not right if the chimericness happens. sent14: if the bolographicness does not occur the non-Proustianness and the rustling occurs. sent15: the rustling happens if the fact that both the taming serger and the leaning occurs does not hold. sent16: that the taming serger does not occur prevents the rustling. sent17: the rustling does not occur if the fact that the taming serger and the leanness happens is false. sent18: the murmuring curve does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the rustling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Proustianness does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that that the taming serger happens and the leanness occurs is correct is false.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the rustling does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Proustianness happens.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the dinging Lentinus does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the Proustianness occurs is caused by the rustling. ; $context$ = sent1: the taming etcher does not occur if that the taming etcher and the non-impartialness occurs is incorrect. sent2: if the fresco happens then the plating occurs. sent3: the fact that the dinging Lentinus does not occur hold if the fact that the Proustianness occurs and the rustling happens does not hold. sent4: if the mutter does not occur then both the ESM and the fresco happens. sent5: the fact that that the taming serger and the leaning occurs hold is wrong if the Proustianness does not occur. sent6: that the papalness does not occur is prevented by that the non-Proustianness and the rustling happens. sent7: if the chimericness does not occur then the bolographicness does not occur and the incommensurateness happens. sent8: the murmuring clinker does not occur if the shrinking liveliness does not occur. sent9: the chimericness does not occur and the shrinking property does not occur if the taming etcher does not occur. sent10: the frescoing does not occur. sent11: the unservileness occurs. sent12: that the taming etcher but not the impartialness occurs does not hold if the plating occurs. sent13: that the optometry and the sanitation occurs is not right if the chimericness happens. sent14: if the bolographicness does not occur the non-Proustianness and the rustling occurs. sent15: the rustling happens if the fact that both the taming serger and the leaning occurs does not hold. sent16: that the taming serger does not occur prevents the rustling. sent17: the rustling does not occur if the fact that the taming serger and the leanness happens is false. sent18: the murmuring curve does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the rustling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Proustianness does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that that the taming serger happens and the leanness occurs is correct is false.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the rustling does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Proustianness happens.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__