either the non-Demoticness or the exhausting or both happens.
sent1: that the achromaticness does not occur yields that the algalness does not occur and the scorching Algerian does not occur. sent2: the squiring safe-deposit does not occur. sent3: the fact that the pleasantry does not occur and the squiring conveyancer does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the pyrotechnicsness happens but the scorching sneaking does not occur does not hold the exhausting occurs. sent5: that the pyrotechnicsness happens but the scorching sneaking does not occur is wrong if the unimportantness does not occur. sent6: the algalness does not occur if both the scorching Algerian and the non-unimportantness happens. sent7: the exegeticness does not occur if the compensation does not occur. sent8: both the squiring conveyancer and the non-bronchiolarness happens if that the achromaticness occurs is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the achromaticness occurs and the scorching firetrap occurs is wrong if the algalness does not occur. sent10: if the pleasantry occurs then the snobbery occurs. sent11: the pleasantry occurs if the fact that the pleasantry does not occur and the squiring conveyancer does not occur is not true. sent12: if the exegeticness does not occur then that the intrinsicness and the swerving occurs is not correct. sent13: the swerving does not occur if that both the intrinsicness and the swerving occurs is incorrect. sent14: both the sanctification and the lecturing happens. sent15: if the algalness does not occur and the scorching Algerian does not occur then the unimportantness does not occur. sent16: if the root does not occur but the incomprehensibleness happens then the compensation does not occur. sent17: the scorching sneaking does not occur if the fact that both the scorching sneaking and the exhaust occurs is wrong. sent18: that the lecturing and the snobbery occurs causes that the rooting does not occur. sent19: that the scorching sneaking happens and the exhausting happens is not right if the pyrotechnicsness does not occur. sent20: if the swerve does not occur the non-pyrotechnicsness and the non-Demoticness occurs. sent21: the scorching firetrap does not occur if that the achromaticness and the scorching firetrap occurs is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the achromaticness occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the squiring conveyancer and the non-bronchiolarness happens.; int1 -> int2: the bronchiolarness does not occur.;
that the Demoticness does not occur and/or the exhaust happens is false.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = either the non-Demoticness or the exhausting or both happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the achromaticness does not occur yields that the algalness does not occur and the scorching Algerian does not occur. sent2: the squiring safe-deposit does not occur. sent3: the fact that the pleasantry does not occur and the squiring conveyancer does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the pyrotechnicsness happens but the scorching sneaking does not occur does not hold the exhausting occurs. sent5: that the pyrotechnicsness happens but the scorching sneaking does not occur is wrong if the unimportantness does not occur. sent6: the algalness does not occur if both the scorching Algerian and the non-unimportantness happens. sent7: the exegeticness does not occur if the compensation does not occur. sent8: both the squiring conveyancer and the non-bronchiolarness happens if that the achromaticness occurs is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the achromaticness occurs and the scorching firetrap occurs is wrong if the algalness does not occur. sent10: if the pleasantry occurs then the snobbery occurs. sent11: the pleasantry occurs if the fact that the pleasantry does not occur and the squiring conveyancer does not occur is not true. sent12: if the exegeticness does not occur then that the intrinsicness and the swerving occurs is not correct. sent13: the swerving does not occur if that both the intrinsicness and the swerving occurs is incorrect. sent14: both the sanctification and the lecturing happens. sent15: if the algalness does not occur and the scorching Algerian does not occur then the unimportantness does not occur. sent16: if the root does not occur but the incomprehensibleness happens then the compensation does not occur. sent17: the scorching sneaking does not occur if the fact that both the scorching sneaking and the exhaust occurs is wrong. sent18: that the lecturing and the snobbery occurs causes that the rooting does not occur. sent19: that the scorching sneaking happens and the exhausting happens is not right if the pyrotechnicsness does not occur. sent20: if the swerve does not occur the non-pyrotechnicsness and the non-Demoticness occurs. sent21: the scorching firetrap does not occur if that the achromaticness and the scorching firetrap occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the achromaticness occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the squiring conveyancer and the non-bronchiolarness happens.; int1 -> int2: the bronchiolarness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__