the fact that there is something such that if it is a Leakey it is a sick and is not cataplastic is not correct.
sent1: that the paw is sick is correct if it is a Leakey. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Leakey it is not cataplastic is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Leakey it is sick and it is cataplastic. sent4: if the paw is a Leakey it is a sick and cataplastic. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a Leakey is not false it is a sick. sent6: there is something such that if it does empty paw it is hydrometric and it is not a smoothbore. sent7: there exists something such that if it is Cappadocian then it is a carry-over and it is not peritoneal. sent8: the paw is sick but it is not cataplastic if it is a kind of a Leakey.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a Leakey it is a sick and is not cataplastic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the paw is sick is correct if it is a Leakey. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Leakey it is not cataplastic is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Leakey it is sick and it is cataplastic. sent4: if the paw is a Leakey it is a sick and cataplastic. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a Leakey is not false it is a sick. sent6: there is something such that if it does empty paw it is hydrometric and it is not a smoothbore. sent7: there exists something such that if it is Cappadocian then it is a carry-over and it is not peritoneal. sent8: the paw is sick but it is not cataplastic if it is a kind of a Leakey. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__