the monozygoticness happens if the attrition occurs.
sent1: the monozygoticness occurs if the fact that both the non-holisticness and the larceny occurs does not hold. sent2: the holisticness does not occur. sent3: the daciticness happens if either the larceny does not occur or the holisticness does not occur or both. sent4: that the holisticness happens causes the monozygoticness. sent5: that the tunneling verger occurs hold. sent6: that the larceny occurs and the tunneling verger occurs brings about that the attrition does not occur. sent7: if the jumpstart occurs the furloughing judgeship occurs. sent8: that the stylization and the boycotting happens is incorrect. sent9: the non-biographicness and the unlikableness happens. sent10: the bodywork occurs. sent11: if the larceny happens and the tunneling verger happens then the attrition occurs. sent12: the fact that both the holisticness and the larceny happens does not hold. sent13: the maritalness occurs and the tunneling hypoadrenalism occurs. sent14: the furloughing axiology does not occur but the furloughing Polyplacophora happens. sent15: the proverbialness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the holisticness but the larceny occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the larceny occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the larceny occurs and the tunneling verger happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the attrition does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the attrition occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the non-holisticness and the larceny happens is wrong.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the monozygoticness happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the daciticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the monozygoticness happens if the attrition occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the monozygoticness occurs if the fact that both the non-holisticness and the larceny occurs does not hold. sent2: the holisticness does not occur. sent3: the daciticness happens if either the larceny does not occur or the holisticness does not occur or both. sent4: that the holisticness happens causes the monozygoticness. sent5: that the tunneling verger occurs hold. sent6: that the larceny occurs and the tunneling verger occurs brings about that the attrition does not occur. sent7: if the jumpstart occurs the furloughing judgeship occurs. sent8: that the stylization and the boycotting happens is incorrect. sent9: the non-biographicness and the unlikableness happens. sent10: the bodywork occurs. sent11: if the larceny happens and the tunneling verger happens then the attrition occurs. sent12: the fact that both the holisticness and the larceny happens does not hold. sent13: the maritalness occurs and the tunneling hypoadrenalism occurs. sent14: the furloughing axiology does not occur but the furloughing Polyplacophora happens. sent15: the proverbialness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the holisticness but the larceny occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the larceny occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the larceny occurs and the tunneling verger happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the attrition does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the attrition occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the non-holisticness and the larceny happens is wrong.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the monozygoticness happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__