the fact that the plaza is libidinal and it flattens defamer does not hold.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a cerise the sonar is a black and it is a thresher. sent2: if something is a kind of a black that it is libidinal and it does not flatten defamer does not hold. sent3: there is something such that it is a kind of a cerise. sent4: The defamer does flatten plaza. sent5: if the tacker is not a Cygnus that it does not turf batik and is not a piper is wrong. sent6: if something that is an antiviral is not a waste then it is beneficent. sent7: the plaza does flatten defamer. sent8: the plaza is a kind of antiviral thing that does not waste. sent9: if that something does not turf batik and it is not a kind of a piper does not hold then the fact that it is not non-beneficent is not wrong. sent10: if the tacker is beneficent then the radial is beneficent. sent11: the tacker does turf Kennewick and is not a Cygnus. sent12: if the plaza is beneficent it is libidinal. sent13: the plaza is not a waste.
sent6 -> int1: if the plaza is an antiviral and is not a waste then that it is beneficent is not incorrect.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the plaza is beneficent.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the plaza is libidinal.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the radial is both not non-beneficent and algal.
sent9 -> int4: that the tacker is beneficent is not false if the fact that it does not turf batik and is not a kind of a piper is not right.; sent11 -> int5: the tacker is not a kind of a Cygnus.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the tacker does not turf batik and is not a piper does not hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the tacker is beneficent.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the radial is beneficent.; sent2 -> int9: the fact that the sonar is libidinal but it does not flatten defamer is wrong if it is a kind of a black.; sent3 & sent1 -> int10: the sonar is black and it is a thresher.; int10 -> int11: the sonar is a kind of a black.; int9 & int11 -> int12: that the sonar is libidinal but it does not flatten defamer is wrong.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is libidinal thing that does not flatten defamer is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the plaza is libidinal and it flattens defamer does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a cerise the sonar is a black and it is a thresher. sent2: if something is a kind of a black that it is libidinal and it does not flatten defamer does not hold. sent3: there is something such that it is a kind of a cerise. sent4: The defamer does flatten plaza. sent5: if the tacker is not a Cygnus that it does not turf batik and is not a piper is wrong. sent6: if something that is an antiviral is not a waste then it is beneficent. sent7: the plaza does flatten defamer. sent8: the plaza is a kind of antiviral thing that does not waste. sent9: if that something does not turf batik and it is not a kind of a piper does not hold then the fact that it is not non-beneficent is not wrong. sent10: if the tacker is beneficent then the radial is beneficent. sent11: the tacker does turf Kennewick and is not a Cygnus. sent12: if the plaza is beneficent it is libidinal. sent13: the plaza is not a waste. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the plaza is an antiviral and is not a waste then that it is beneficent is not incorrect.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the plaza is beneficent.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the plaza is libidinal.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__