the S.U.V. is a waterside or it does not prod garbage or both.
sent1: the ornithopod is hexangular and/or it is not quiet. sent2: something that is a kind of non-antecedent thing that is not quiet is not hexangular. sent3: if that that something is not a waterside and/or it prods garbage is not incorrect does not hold then that it does not housekeep brashness is true. sent4: if the ornithopod does housekeep brashness that either the S.U.V. is a waterside or it does not prod garbage or both is false. sent5: something is not hexangular if it is an antecedent. sent6: the ornithopod is not an antecedent if it does not relace overdrive and is not a penance. sent7: if the fact that the ornithopod does not relace overdrive and it is not a penance is not true then it does housekeep brashness. sent8: the fact that the ornithopod does housekeep capsaicin and/or it does not constellate is wrong if the S.U.V. is hexangular. sent9: something is a waterside and/or it does not prod garbage if it is not hexangular. sent10: the fact that the ornithopod either is hexangular or is not quiet or both is not right if it is not antecedent.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ornithopod does not relace overdrive and it is not a penance.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the ornithopod is not a kind of an antecedent.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the ornithopod is hexangular or it is not quiet or both is wrong.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the ornithopod does not relace overdrive and is not a penance does not hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the ornithopod housekeeps brashness.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that either the ornithopod housekeeps capsaicin or it does not constellate or both does not hold.
sent3 -> int6: the opener does not housekeep brashness if the fact that either it is not a waterside or it prods garbage or both is wrong.; sent2 -> int7: if the S.U.V. is not antecedent and it is not quiet then it is hexangular.;
$hypothesis$ = the S.U.V. is a waterside or it does not prod garbage or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the ornithopod is hexangular and/or it is not quiet. sent2: something that is a kind of non-antecedent thing that is not quiet is not hexangular. sent3: if that that something is not a waterside and/or it prods garbage is not incorrect does not hold then that it does not housekeep brashness is true. sent4: if the ornithopod does housekeep brashness that either the S.U.V. is a waterside or it does not prod garbage or both is false. sent5: something is not hexangular if it is an antecedent. sent6: the ornithopod is not an antecedent if it does not relace overdrive and is not a penance. sent7: if the fact that the ornithopod does not relace overdrive and it is not a penance is not true then it does housekeep brashness. sent8: the fact that the ornithopod does housekeep capsaicin and/or it does not constellate is wrong if the S.U.V. is hexangular. sent9: something is a waterside and/or it does not prod garbage if it is not hexangular. sent10: the fact that the ornithopod either is hexangular or is not quiet or both is not right if it is not antecedent. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ornithopod does not relace overdrive and it is not a penance.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the ornithopod is not a kind of an antecedent.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the ornithopod is hexangular or it is not quiet or both is wrong.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the ornithopod does not relace overdrive and is not a penance does not hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the ornithopod housekeeps brashness.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__