there is something such that if it is not uneager and does not group tobogganing it is not a kind of a sprocket.
sent1: the watermeal does not group tobogganing if it is both a ezo-yama-hagi and not resident. sent2: the watermeal is not a sprocket if it is not uneager and groups tobogganing. sent3: if the watermeal is not uneager and it does not group tobogganing then it is not a sprocket. sent4: if the watermeal is uneager and does not group tobogganing then that it is not a sprocket hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a Momotus and is not a Ecuadorian it is not a kind of a minocycline. sent6: there is something such that if it is eager thing that groups tobogganing then it is not a sprocket. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a crus and it does not depend it is not formic. sent8: if something that is not logarithmic is not inferential it does not barbarize MP.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the MP does not barbarize MP if it is non-logarithmic and not inferential.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not uneager and does not group tobogganing it is not a kind of a sprocket. ; $context$ = sent1: the watermeal does not group tobogganing if it is both a ezo-yama-hagi and not resident. sent2: the watermeal is not a sprocket if it is not uneager and groups tobogganing. sent3: if the watermeal is not uneager and it does not group tobogganing then it is not a sprocket. sent4: if the watermeal is uneager and does not group tobogganing then that it is not a sprocket hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a Momotus and is not a Ecuadorian it is not a kind of a minocycline. sent6: there is something such that if it is eager thing that groups tobogganing then it is not a sprocket. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a crus and it does not depend it is not formic. sent8: if something that is not logarithmic is not inferential it does not barbarize MP. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__