that the fact that the concessiveness does not occur is not incorrect if the tramping occurs is not correct.
sent1: if the rationalistness or the tramp or both happens the concessiveness does not occur. sent2: if the preening occurs then the lactogenicness does not occur. sent3: the concessiveness happens if the rationalistness or the tramping or both occurs. sent4: the non-bareness is prevented by the jumping or the excising wedge or both. sent5: if the disrespectfulness occurs the fact that the Rosicrucian does not occur is right. sent6: the appellateness happens. sent7: the Wordsworthianness leads to that the stigmatizing paleface occurs. sent8: if the perplexing Thomism occurs the ruminant does not occur. sent9: the excising globetrotter occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tramping happens.; assump1 -> int1: the rationalistness and/or the tramp occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the concessiveness does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the concessiveness does not occur is not incorrect if the tramping occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rationalistness or the tramp or both happens the concessiveness does not occur. sent2: if the preening occurs then the lactogenicness does not occur. sent3: the concessiveness happens if the rationalistness or the tramping or both occurs. sent4: the non-bareness is prevented by the jumping or the excising wedge or both. sent5: if the disrespectfulness occurs the fact that the Rosicrucian does not occur is right. sent6: the appellateness happens. sent7: the Wordsworthianness leads to that the stigmatizing paleface occurs. sent8: if the perplexing Thomism occurs the ruminant does not occur. sent9: the excising globetrotter occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tramping happens.; assump1 -> int1: the rationalistness and/or the tramp occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the concessiveness does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__