if the stereoscope mythologizes Coricidin then the fact that the drop-leaf is not a leftover and is not imperialistic is not true.
sent1: the fact that the console does not mythologize Coricidin and is not an impress does not hold if the fact that the stereoscope is not non-Celtic is not incorrect. sent2: if the console impresses the drop-leaf is not imperialistic and it does not mythologize transposon. sent3: the fact that the stereoscope does stuff hemlock and it is not non-imperialistic is not true. sent4: the console is not a kind of a leftover. sent5: that the menhaden is both an impress and meritocratic does not hold if something is not a Celtic. sent6: if something does not mythologize transposon the fact that it is a leftover that is not a Celtic is not correct. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not meritocratic the poultry is non-low-level and piscatorial. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the console is a Celtic but it is not meritocratic is false is correct then the stereoscope does not mythologize Coricidin. sent9: that the drop-leaf is not a leftover and is not imperialistic is false if the menhaden is not imperialistic. sent10: the stereoscope is a leftover. sent11: if the menhaden does not mythologize transposon but it fleshes hydra then the console is not a kind of an impress. sent12: if the drop-leaf is a Celtic the menhaden does not mythologize transposon and is not a leftover. sent13: if the menhaden does not flesh hydra then it is not imperialistic. sent14: something is not imperialistic if the fact that it does not mythologize transposon and it fleshes hydra is not right. sent15: if that the menhaden is imperialistic and is not an impress is incorrect then the console does not mythologize transposon. sent16: if that something is an impress and is meritocratic is not true it is not meritocratic. sent17: there exists nothing such that it is both Celtic and not imperialistic. sent18: that something is a Celtic but it is not meritocratic is incorrect if it does not impress. sent19: the fact that the console is a kind of a leftover and is meritocratic does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the menhaden does not mythologize transposon but it fleshes hydra.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the console is not an impress.; sent18 -> int2: that the console is both not non-Celtic and not meritocratic does not hold if it is not an impress.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the console is a Celtic and is not meritocratic is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the stereoscope does not mythologize Coricidin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stereoscope mythologizes Coricidin.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the menhaden does not mythologize transposon and does flesh hydra is not correct.; sent14 -> int7: the menhaden is not imperialistic if that it does not mythologize transposon and it fleshes hydra is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the menhaden is not imperialistic.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the drop-leaf is not a leftover and it is not imperialistic does not hold.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the poultry is not low-level but piscatorial.
sent16 -> int10: if the fact that the menhaden is an impress and meritocratic is wrong then it is not meritocratic.; sent17 -> int11: that the stereoscope is a kind of a Celtic but it is not imperialistic is incorrect.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is a kind of Celtic thing that is not imperialistic is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = if the stereoscope mythologizes Coricidin then the fact that the drop-leaf is not a leftover and is not imperialistic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the console does not mythologize Coricidin and is not an impress does not hold if the fact that the stereoscope is not non-Celtic is not incorrect. sent2: if the console impresses the drop-leaf is not imperialistic and it does not mythologize transposon. sent3: the fact that the stereoscope does stuff hemlock and it is not non-imperialistic is not true. sent4: the console is not a kind of a leftover. sent5: that the menhaden is both an impress and meritocratic does not hold if something is not a Celtic. sent6: if something does not mythologize transposon the fact that it is a leftover that is not a Celtic is not correct. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not meritocratic the poultry is non-low-level and piscatorial. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the console is a Celtic but it is not meritocratic is false is correct then the stereoscope does not mythologize Coricidin. sent9: that the drop-leaf is not a leftover and is not imperialistic is false if the menhaden is not imperialistic. sent10: the stereoscope is a leftover. sent11: if the menhaden does not mythologize transposon but it fleshes hydra then the console is not a kind of an impress. sent12: if the drop-leaf is a Celtic the menhaden does not mythologize transposon and is not a leftover. sent13: if the menhaden does not flesh hydra then it is not imperialistic. sent14: something is not imperialistic if the fact that it does not mythologize transposon and it fleshes hydra is not right. sent15: if that the menhaden is imperialistic and is not an impress is incorrect then the console does not mythologize transposon. sent16: if that something is an impress and is meritocratic is not true it is not meritocratic. sent17: there exists nothing such that it is both Celtic and not imperialistic. sent18: that something is a Celtic but it is not meritocratic is incorrect if it does not impress. sent19: the fact that the console is a kind of a leftover and is meritocratic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the menhaden does not mythologize transposon but it fleshes hydra.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the console is not an impress.; sent18 -> int2: that the console is both not non-Celtic and not meritocratic does not hold if it is not an impress.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the console is a Celtic and is not meritocratic is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the stereoscope does not mythologize Coricidin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stereoscope mythologizes Coricidin.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the menhaden does not mythologize transposon and does flesh hydra is not correct.; sent14 -> int7: the menhaden is not imperialistic if that it does not mythologize transposon and it fleshes hydra is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the menhaden is not imperialistic.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the drop-leaf is not a leftover and it is not imperialistic does not hold.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__