the sponger is a sulk.
sent1: if that something is both not non-Protestant and a Brownie is false then the fact that it is not a kind of a sulk hold. sent2: if the rapporteur is a dermatoglyphic then the sponger is a kind of a sulk. sent3: the rift sulks if that it is not a pliancy and it is a clincher does not hold. sent4: the prefect is not a Brownie if that that the rift is a kind of a clincher or it is not a pliancy or both is incorrect hold. sent5: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a clincher and/or it is not a pliancy. sent6: the fact that the rapporteur is a Brownie and it is a Protestant is false. sent7: something is a dermatoglyphic if the fact that the fact that it is not a Brownie and it is a kind of a Protestant is not false is not correct. sent8: if the prefect is not a Brownie then the fact that the rapporteur is not a Brownie but Protestant is not correct.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the rift is a clincher and/or it is not a pliancy is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the prefect is not a Brownie.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the rapporteur is both not a Brownie and a Protestant is false.; sent7 -> int4: the rapporteur is a kind of a dermatoglyphic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Brownie and is a Protestant is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the rapporteur is a dermatoglyphic.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the sponger does not sulk.
sent1 -> int6: the sponger does not sulk if the fact that it is Protestant and it is a kind of a Brownie is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the sponger is a sulk. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is both not non-Protestant and a Brownie is false then the fact that it is not a kind of a sulk hold. sent2: if the rapporteur is a dermatoglyphic then the sponger is a kind of a sulk. sent3: the rift sulks if that it is not a pliancy and it is a clincher does not hold. sent4: the prefect is not a Brownie if that that the rift is a kind of a clincher or it is not a pliancy or both is incorrect hold. sent5: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a clincher and/or it is not a pliancy. sent6: the fact that the rapporteur is a Brownie and it is a Protestant is false. sent7: something is a dermatoglyphic if the fact that the fact that it is not a Brownie and it is a kind of a Protestant is not false is not correct. sent8: if the prefect is not a Brownie then the fact that the rapporteur is not a Brownie but Protestant is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the rift is a clincher and/or it is not a pliancy is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the prefect is not a Brownie.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the rapporteur is both not a Brownie and a Protestant is false.; sent7 -> int4: the rapporteur is a kind of a dermatoglyphic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Brownie and is a Protestant is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the rapporteur is a dermatoglyphic.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__