the fact that the accumulator is both a move and not clad does not hold.
sent1: the chateau is clad if the reasoner is a Seseli. sent2: there is something such that that it fractures proctology and is Rousseauan does not hold. sent3: if the chateau is not a Seseli then that the reasoner is architectural and it is a kind of a lacteal is not correct. sent4: the accumulator is a kind of a move if there exists something such that that it fractures narcolepsy and is not a move is wrong. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does fracture proctology and is Rousseauan is incorrect then the reasoner is a kind of a Seseli. sent6: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Mosaic or it is not a Seseli or both is not wrong then it is not a Seseli. sent7: if the church is a kind of a condylion then the fact that the gelechiid does fracture narcolepsy and is not a move is incorrect. sent8: the church is a condylion.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the reasoner is a Seseli.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the chateau is clad.;
there is something such that that it is architectural and it is a lacteal is false.
sent6 -> int3: if the chateau is not Mosaic or it is not a Seseli or both then it is not a Seseli.; sent7 & sent8 -> int4: that the gelechiid fractures narcolepsy and is not a move is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it does fracture narcolepsy and it does not move is false.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the accumulator does move.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the accumulator is both a move and not clad does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the chateau is clad if the reasoner is a Seseli. sent2: there is something such that that it fractures proctology and is Rousseauan does not hold. sent3: if the chateau is not a Seseli then that the reasoner is architectural and it is a kind of a lacteal is not correct. sent4: the accumulator is a kind of a move if there exists something such that that it fractures narcolepsy and is not a move is wrong. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does fracture proctology and is Rousseauan is incorrect then the reasoner is a kind of a Seseli. sent6: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Mosaic or it is not a Seseli or both is not wrong then it is not a Seseli. sent7: if the church is a kind of a condylion then the fact that the gelechiid does fracture narcolepsy and is not a move is incorrect. sent8: the church is a condylion. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the reasoner is a Seseli.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the chateau is clad.; __UNKNOWN__