there exists something such that if it is non-legato that it is not a ACC and it is a viticulture is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not legato then that it is a ACC and it is a viticulture does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is legato then the fact that it is not a ACC and it is a viticulture is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it does not recombine hellebore that it recombines pesto and creeps does not hold. sent4: if the feeding is not legato then the fact that it is a ACC and is a viticulture is wrong. sent5: if the feeding is not legato the fact that it is not a kind of a ACC and is a viticulture is wrong. sent6: the fact that if something is not premenstrual then that it does not tweedle gazpacho and does communicate is false is right.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not premenstrual the fact that it does not tweedle gazpacho and it communicates is not right.
sent6 -> int1: that that the ethchlorvynol does not tweedle gazpacho but it communicates is not wrong is not right if it is not premenstrual.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is non-legato that it is not a ACC and it is a viticulture is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not legato then that it is a ACC and it is a viticulture does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is legato then the fact that it is not a ACC and it is a viticulture is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it does not recombine hellebore that it recombines pesto and creeps does not hold. sent4: if the feeding is not legato then the fact that it is a ACC and is a viticulture is wrong. sent5: if the feeding is not legato the fact that it is not a kind of a ACC and is a viticulture is wrong. sent6: the fact that if something is not premenstrual then that it does not tweedle gazpacho and does communicate is false is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__