that the faithfulness occurs if the fact that the conquest does not occur is not false is incorrect.
sent1: the sit-down does not occur. sent2: that the saurianness occurs prevents that the Arabic does not occur. sent3: the klondike happens. sent4: the fact that the efficaciousness occurs is correct. sent5: the fact that the harrying Rous does not occur and the encrusting utmost does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the faithful does not occur is right. sent6: that the paganizing does not occur hold. sent7: the verbolatry occurs. sent8: the transoceanicness does not occur and the comber does not occur if the ribbing does not occur. sent9: if the reissuing RFD happens then the faithfulness occurs. sent10: if the fact that the faithfulness and the Arabicness happens is not right the faithfulness does not occur. sent11: the Ravel happens and the bedewing wicker happens. sent12: if that the comber does not occur hold then the immunochemicalness and the reissuing RFD happens. sent13: the lecturing happens. sent14: the conquest occurs and the klondike happens if the reissuing RFD does not occur. sent15: the papilliformness does not occur. sent16: the overexploitation happens. sent17: the harrying Rous occurs if the fact that the harrying Rous does not occur and the encrusting utmost does not occur is false. sent18: that the klondike happens is triggered by that the reissuing RFD does not occur. sent19: the southeaster occurs and the gnarling occurs. sent20: if the conquest occurs the faithful happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the reissuing RFD does not occur.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: both the conquest and the klondike occurs.; int1 -> int2: the conquest occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the conquest does not occur is right.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the reissuing RFD happens.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the faithful happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the immunochemicalness and the harrying Rous occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the faithfulness occurs if the fact that the conquest does not occur is not false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the sit-down does not occur. sent2: that the saurianness occurs prevents that the Arabic does not occur. sent3: the klondike happens. sent4: the fact that the efficaciousness occurs is correct. sent5: the fact that the harrying Rous does not occur and the encrusting utmost does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the faithful does not occur is right. sent6: that the paganizing does not occur hold. sent7: the verbolatry occurs. sent8: the transoceanicness does not occur and the comber does not occur if the ribbing does not occur. sent9: if the reissuing RFD happens then the faithfulness occurs. sent10: if the fact that the faithfulness and the Arabicness happens is not right the faithfulness does not occur. sent11: the Ravel happens and the bedewing wicker happens. sent12: if that the comber does not occur hold then the immunochemicalness and the reissuing RFD happens. sent13: the lecturing happens. sent14: the conquest occurs and the klondike happens if the reissuing RFD does not occur. sent15: the papilliformness does not occur. sent16: the overexploitation happens. sent17: the harrying Rous occurs if the fact that the harrying Rous does not occur and the encrusting utmost does not occur is false. sent18: that the klondike happens is triggered by that the reissuing RFD does not occur. sent19: the southeaster occurs and the gnarling occurs. sent20: if the conquest occurs the faithful happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the reissuing RFD does not occur.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: both the conquest and the klondike occurs.; int1 -> int2: the conquest occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the conquest does not occur is right.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the reissuing RFD happens.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the faithful happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__