the fact that the names is not a Huguenot and it is not higher is correct.
sent1: that the petrifaction does flog but it does not axe dacryocyst is incorrect if it leases bittercress. sent2: the petrifaction does not axe dacryocyst. sent3: the petrifaction is higher. sent4: the Casanova is higher if there is something such that either it does not lease bittercress or it is not a perfectionism or both. sent5: the petrifaction flogs. sent6: that something is not a perfectionism but it leases bittercress is incorrect if it is a harmonic. sent7: that the names does axe dacryocyst is not incorrect. sent8: the names is not a Huguenot and not higher if the Casanova is higher. sent9: if something does not lease bittercress the fact that it is not a Huguenot and is not higher does not hold. sent10: The dacryocyst does not axe petrifaction.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the petrifaction does lease bittercress.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the petrifaction flogs and does not axe dacryocyst is incorrect.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the petrifaction does flog but it does not axe dacryocyst.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the petrifaction does not lease bittercress.; int4 -> int5: the petrifaction does not lease bittercress and/or it is not a perfectionism.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not lease bittercress and/or it is not a kind of a perfectionism.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the Casanova is not higher is not true is not false.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the names is not a kind of a Huguenot and is not higher is false.
sent9 -> int8: if that the names does not lease bittercress is true the fact that it is both not a Huguenot and not higher is not correct.; sent6 -> int9: the fact that the petrifaction is not a perfectionism and does lease bittercress is not correct if it is a harmonic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the names is not a Huguenot and it is not higher is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the petrifaction does flog but it does not axe dacryocyst is incorrect if it leases bittercress. sent2: the petrifaction does not axe dacryocyst. sent3: the petrifaction is higher. sent4: the Casanova is higher if there is something such that either it does not lease bittercress or it is not a perfectionism or both. sent5: the petrifaction flogs. sent6: that something is not a perfectionism but it leases bittercress is incorrect if it is a harmonic. sent7: that the names does axe dacryocyst is not incorrect. sent8: the names is not a Huguenot and not higher if the Casanova is higher. sent9: if something does not lease bittercress the fact that it is not a Huguenot and is not higher does not hold. sent10: The dacryocyst does not axe petrifaction. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the petrifaction does lease bittercress.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the petrifaction flogs and does not axe dacryocyst is incorrect.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the petrifaction does flog but it does not axe dacryocyst.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the petrifaction does not lease bittercress.; int4 -> int5: the petrifaction does not lease bittercress and/or it is not a perfectionism.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not lease bittercress and/or it is not a kind of a perfectionism.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the Casanova is not higher is not true is not false.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__