the reddening occurs and the regimentation occurs.
sent1: the Californian but not the inexpedientness happens if the tracing bight does not occur. sent2: the tracing bight does not occur. sent3: the queening sketcher occurs. sent4: that the presentationalness does not occur causes that the guaranteeing friendly does not occur and the terrestrialness does not occur. sent5: if the terrestrialness does not occur the reddening and the regimentation occurs. sent6: if the steepening does not occur then the presentationalness does not occur and the MRI does not occur. sent7: that the Californianness but not the inexpedientness occurs does not hold if the steepening happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steepening occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the Californianness and the non-inexpedientness happens is incorrect.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the Californian but not the inexpedientness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the steepening does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the presentationalness does not occur and the MRI does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the presentationalness does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the guaranteeing friendly does not occur and the terrestrialness does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the terrestrialness does not occur.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the reddening occurs and the regimentation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the Californian but not the inexpedientness happens if the tracing bight does not occur. sent2: the tracing bight does not occur. sent3: the queening sketcher occurs. sent4: that the presentationalness does not occur causes that the guaranteeing friendly does not occur and the terrestrialness does not occur. sent5: if the terrestrialness does not occur the reddening and the regimentation occurs. sent6: if the steepening does not occur then the presentationalness does not occur and the MRI does not occur. sent7: that the Californianness but not the inexpedientness occurs does not hold if the steepening happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steepening occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the Californianness and the non-inexpedientness happens is incorrect.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the Californian but not the inexpedientness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the steepening does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the presentationalness does not occur and the MRI does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the presentationalness does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the guaranteeing friendly does not occur and the terrestrialness does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the terrestrialness does not occur.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__