the oticness happens and the homily happens.
sent1: both the homily and the scoffing spelldown happens. sent2: the redemption occurs if that the unrepeatableness does not occur or the Apocryphalness does not occur or both is not true. sent3: the feeding grillroom occurs if the enskying antibiotic happens. sent4: the surmising and/or the scoffing finnan happens. sent5: the scoffing survivor occurs if the surmising happens and/or the scoffing finnan does not occur. sent6: the fact that the leading does not occur and the commensurateness does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the exalting irreligionist happens is caused by that the Chileanness and/or the non-unapproachableness occurs. sent8: the feeding prurigo occurs. sent9: that the oticness and the homily happens is not true if the enskying antibiotic does not occur. sent10: the enskying antibiotic occurs. sent11: if the redemption occurs the oticness happens. sent12: the fact that the repeatableness and/or the non-Apocryphalness occurs is not correct if the fact that the vasoconstriction does not occur is not wrong. sent13: the surmising happens if that that the leading does not occur and the commensurateness does not occur is true does not hold. sent14: the fact that that the exalting hereditament does not occur and the ploy does not occur does not hold is not wrong.
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the feeding grillroom occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the vasoconstriction happens is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the feeding grillroom happens and the vasoconstriction happens.; sent13 & sent6 -> int3: the surmising occurs.; int3 -> int4: the surmising occurs or the scoffing finnan does not occur or both.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the scoffing survivor occurs.; sent1 -> int6: the homily occurs.;
the fact that the oticness occurs and the homily occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the oticness happens and the homily happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the homily and the scoffing spelldown happens. sent2: the redemption occurs if that the unrepeatableness does not occur or the Apocryphalness does not occur or both is not true. sent3: the feeding grillroom occurs if the enskying antibiotic happens. sent4: the surmising and/or the scoffing finnan happens. sent5: the scoffing survivor occurs if the surmising happens and/or the scoffing finnan does not occur. sent6: the fact that the leading does not occur and the commensurateness does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the exalting irreligionist happens is caused by that the Chileanness and/or the non-unapproachableness occurs. sent8: the feeding prurigo occurs. sent9: that the oticness and the homily happens is not true if the enskying antibiotic does not occur. sent10: the enskying antibiotic occurs. sent11: if the redemption occurs the oticness happens. sent12: the fact that the repeatableness and/or the non-Apocryphalness occurs is not correct if the fact that the vasoconstriction does not occur is not wrong. sent13: the surmising happens if that that the leading does not occur and the commensurateness does not occur is true does not hold. sent14: the fact that that the exalting hereditament does not occur and the ploy does not occur does not hold is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the feeding grillroom occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the vasoconstriction happens is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the feeding grillroom happens and the vasoconstriction happens.; sent13 & sent6 -> int3: the surmising occurs.; int3 -> int4: the surmising occurs or the scoffing finnan does not occur or both.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the scoffing survivor occurs.; sent1 -> int6: the homily occurs.; __UNKNOWN__