that if the phaeton is not point-of-sale the fact that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it does not qualify phaeton is not right is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the epinephrine is a salat but it is not attributive does not hold if the phaeton is not a salat. sent2: if the phaeton is not a salat that the epinephrine is a kind of a salat but it is bellied is not true. sent3: the fact that the epinephrine is bellyless and is attributive is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the fact that that the epinephrine is not bellyless but it does qualify phaeton is not false does not hold is true if that the phaeton is not point-of-sale is not false. sent5: if the phaeton is a salat the lac is not bellyless. sent6: the fact that the lac is point-of-sale but it is bellied is false if the phaeton is not a salat. sent7: the lac is bellied if that the phaeton is both attributive and not a salat does not hold. sent8: if the epinephrine is not bellyless that the lac is not bellyless and qualifies phaeton is not correct. sent9: that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it does not qualify phaeton does not hold if that the lac is not bellyless is right. sent10: that the phaeton is point-of-sale and not bellyless is not right. sent11: if the lac is not bellyless then that the epinephrine is not bellyless but it does qualify phaeton is incorrect. sent12: the phaeton is point-of-sale if it is not non-attributive and it is a salat. sent13: the fact that the grapnel is both a optative and not a hat is incorrect. sent14: the phaeton is not a kind of a salat. sent15: that the lac qualifies phaeton but it is not bellyless is not right. sent16: if the phaeton is attributive and is not a kind of a salat then it is point-of-sale. sent17: if the epinephrine is point-of-sale the phaeton is not bellyless. sent18: the lac is not point-of-sale if the phaeton is attributive. sent19: that the epinephrine does qualify phaeton but it is not attributive is not correct if the phaeton is not bellyless. sent20: the phaeton is not bellyless. sent21: if the phaeton is point-of-sale the fact that the fact that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it does not qualify phaeton is correct is false. sent22: if the phaeton is not bellyless the fact that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it is not point-of-sale does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phaeton is attributive but it is not a salat.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the phaeton is point-of-sale is true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the phaeton is not point-of-sale.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the phaeton is attributive but it is not a salat is false.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the lac is not bellyless.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it does not qualify phaeton is not true.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the phaeton is not point-of-sale the fact that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it does not qualify phaeton is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the epinephrine is a salat but it is not attributive does not hold if the phaeton is not a salat. sent2: if the phaeton is not a salat that the epinephrine is a kind of a salat but it is bellied is not true. sent3: the fact that the epinephrine is bellyless and is attributive is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the fact that that the epinephrine is not bellyless but it does qualify phaeton is not false does not hold is true if that the phaeton is not point-of-sale is not false. sent5: if the phaeton is a salat the lac is not bellyless. sent6: the fact that the lac is point-of-sale but it is bellied is false if the phaeton is not a salat. sent7: the lac is bellied if that the phaeton is both attributive and not a salat does not hold. sent8: if the epinephrine is not bellyless that the lac is not bellyless and qualifies phaeton is not correct. sent9: that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it does not qualify phaeton does not hold if that the lac is not bellyless is right. sent10: that the phaeton is point-of-sale and not bellyless is not right. sent11: if the lac is not bellyless then that the epinephrine is not bellyless but it does qualify phaeton is incorrect. sent12: the phaeton is point-of-sale if it is not non-attributive and it is a salat. sent13: the fact that the grapnel is both a optative and not a hat is incorrect. sent14: the phaeton is not a kind of a salat. sent15: that the lac qualifies phaeton but it is not bellyless is not right. sent16: if the phaeton is attributive and is not a kind of a salat then it is point-of-sale. sent17: if the epinephrine is point-of-sale the phaeton is not bellyless. sent18: the lac is not point-of-sale if the phaeton is attributive. sent19: that the epinephrine does qualify phaeton but it is not attributive is not correct if the phaeton is not bellyless. sent20: the phaeton is not bellyless. sent21: if the phaeton is point-of-sale the fact that the fact that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it does not qualify phaeton is correct is false. sent22: if the phaeton is not bellyless the fact that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it is not point-of-sale does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phaeton is attributive but it is not a salat.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the phaeton is point-of-sale is true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the phaeton is not point-of-sale.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the phaeton is attributive but it is not a salat is false.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the lac is not bellyless.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the epinephrine is not bellyless and it does not qualify phaeton is not true.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__