that there is something such that if it does rival Tayassuidae then the fact that it is not counterinsurgent or it is not a hypodermic or both is false is incorrect.
sent1: that either the fridge is not counterinsurgent or it is not a hypodermic or both is not true if it does rival Tayassuidae. sent2: the fridge is not counterinsurgent and/or is not a kind of a hypodermic if it rivals Tayassuidae. sent3: if that the fridge does rival Tayassuidae is right then it is counterinsurgent. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it rivals Tayassuidae then that it is counterinsurgent or not a hypodermic or both is incorrect is true. sent5: there exists something such that if it does rival Tayassuidae it is not counterinsurgent and/or it is not a kind of a hypodermic. sent6: there is something such that if it rivals Tayassuidae that it is not counterinsurgent and/or is hypodermic does not hold. sent7: if the fridge does rival Tayassuidae that it either is not counterinsurgent or is a hypodermic or both is not right. sent8: there exists something such that if it rivals Tayassuidae it is hypodermic. sent9: that the fridge is not counterinsurgent or it is not Hugoesque or both is wrong if it is a kind of an appealing. sent10: if something is a kind of a kirtle the fact that it does not rival electrode and/or it is not a hypodermic is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it rivals Tayassuidae it is counterinsurgent.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
if the spectrograph is a kirtle then that it does not rival electrode and/or it is not a hypodermic is wrong.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does rival Tayassuidae then the fact that it is not counterinsurgent or it is not a hypodermic or both is false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that either the fridge is not counterinsurgent or it is not a hypodermic or both is not true if it does rival Tayassuidae. sent2: the fridge is not counterinsurgent and/or is not a kind of a hypodermic if it rivals Tayassuidae. sent3: if that the fridge does rival Tayassuidae is right then it is counterinsurgent. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it rivals Tayassuidae then that it is counterinsurgent or not a hypodermic or both is incorrect is true. sent5: there exists something such that if it does rival Tayassuidae it is not counterinsurgent and/or it is not a kind of a hypodermic. sent6: there is something such that if it rivals Tayassuidae that it is not counterinsurgent and/or is hypodermic does not hold. sent7: if the fridge does rival Tayassuidae that it either is not counterinsurgent or is a hypodermic or both is not right. sent8: there exists something such that if it rivals Tayassuidae it is hypodermic. sent9: that the fridge is not counterinsurgent or it is not Hugoesque or both is wrong if it is a kind of an appealing. sent10: if something is a kind of a kirtle the fact that it does not rival electrode and/or it is not a hypodermic is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it rivals Tayassuidae it is counterinsurgent. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__