the smoothness does not occur.
sent1: the stunner occurs. sent2: the fact that the involvement occurs but the rendering sedative-hypnotic does not occur is not true if that the remaindering imagism does not occur is right. sent3: if the litigating does not occur then that the stifling analogy occurs is true. sent4: the fencing happens and the affiliating occurs. sent5: the catatonicness happens. sent6: that the terrestrialness happens is brought about by that the impasto does not occur and/or the eulogizing ANG happens. sent7: either the subcorticalness or the indexation or both occurs. sent8: the allowableness happens. sent9: if the involvement does not occur that both the ruling and the tap occurs is incorrect. sent10: the affiliate happens. sent11: if the stifling analogy and the fencing occurs then the smooth does not occur. sent12: either the litigating does not occur or the approval occurs or both. sent13: if the mudslide happens then the remaindering imagism does not occur but the emulousness occurs. sent14: that the rendering sexism and the colliding occurs yields that the urceolateness does not occur. sent15: the handlessness occurs if the involvement does not occur and/or the salt occurs. sent16: the chokehold happens. sent17: that the rendering defoliation does not occur causes that the subcorticalness occurs or the uncoiling occurs or both. sent18: if the fact that the involvement occurs and the rendering sedative-hypnotic does not occur is wrong then the involvement does not occur. sent19: the stifling pouter happens and the arterialness happens. sent20: if the fact that the ruling and the tapping occurs is not true the rendering defoliation does not occur. sent21: that the smoothing occurs is correct if the fencing does not occur. sent22: either the non-vertebrateness or that the dating occurs or both prevents that the youngness does not occur.
sent4 -> int1: the fencing occurs.;
the smooth occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the smoothness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the stunner occurs. sent2: the fact that the involvement occurs but the rendering sedative-hypnotic does not occur is not true if that the remaindering imagism does not occur is right. sent3: if the litigating does not occur then that the stifling analogy occurs is true. sent4: the fencing happens and the affiliating occurs. sent5: the catatonicness happens. sent6: that the terrestrialness happens is brought about by that the impasto does not occur and/or the eulogizing ANG happens. sent7: either the subcorticalness or the indexation or both occurs. sent8: the allowableness happens. sent9: if the involvement does not occur that both the ruling and the tap occurs is incorrect. sent10: the affiliate happens. sent11: if the stifling analogy and the fencing occurs then the smooth does not occur. sent12: either the litigating does not occur or the approval occurs or both. sent13: if the mudslide happens then the remaindering imagism does not occur but the emulousness occurs. sent14: that the rendering sexism and the colliding occurs yields that the urceolateness does not occur. sent15: the handlessness occurs if the involvement does not occur and/or the salt occurs. sent16: the chokehold happens. sent17: that the rendering defoliation does not occur causes that the subcorticalness occurs or the uncoiling occurs or both. sent18: if the fact that the involvement occurs and the rendering sedative-hypnotic does not occur is wrong then the involvement does not occur. sent19: the stifling pouter happens and the arterialness happens. sent20: if the fact that the ruling and the tapping occurs is not true the rendering defoliation does not occur. sent21: that the smoothing occurs is correct if the fencing does not occur. sent22: either the non-vertebrateness or that the dating occurs or both prevents that the youngness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fencing occurs.; __UNKNOWN__