that there is something such that if the fact that it is directional and it is not a nap is wrong then it is anticlinal does not hold.
sent1: the hippie is not non-fewer if the fact that it is a kind of mature thing that is directional does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a meat and a Wiccan is not true then that it is a fourth is true. sent3: if that the hippie is a kind of directional thing that does not nap does not hold then it is anticlinal. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a Havel that is unsanitary is not correct then it is a Wu. sent5: the keepsake is directional if it is hydrostatics and is not a provocation. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not obscure it is a fourth. sent7: if that the hippie is a kind of judicial thing that is not a tritheist does not hold then it is a kind of a soldierfish.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it is directional and it is not a nap is wrong then it is anticlinal does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the hippie is not non-fewer if the fact that it is a kind of mature thing that is directional does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a meat and a Wiccan is not true then that it is a fourth is true. sent3: if that the hippie is a kind of directional thing that does not nap does not hold then it is anticlinal. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a Havel that is unsanitary is not correct then it is a Wu. sent5: the keepsake is directional if it is hydrostatics and is not a provocation. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not obscure it is a fourth. sent7: if that the hippie is a kind of judicial thing that is not a tritheist does not hold then it is a kind of a soldierfish. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__