the macaroni is a kind of a fritillary.
sent1: the fact that the lanyard is not a bovine if the reliever does tag GIGO is right. sent2: the fact that the macaroni is a fritillary is true if the Son does bounce. sent3: the bichromate is not unrepeatable. sent4: if the halfbeak does not defuse halfbeak the murderer does not defuse halfbeak. sent5: the fact that everything does not tag Pujunan is true. sent6: the reliever tags GIGO if it defuses triangularity. sent7: if that the stumblebum is an effect that does glorify is incorrect then the halfbeak does not stalemate. sent8: everything is a kind of non-unrepeatable thing that is not regretful. sent9: if that something either is not a kind of a memorization or is incidental or both is incorrect then it is a corundom. sent10: the fact that the Son bounces or it is regretful or both is not correct if the bichromate is not regretful. sent11: if something does not defuse halfbeak then the fact that it is not a kind of a parquetry and it is mesial is not true. sent12: the Son is not regretful. sent13: that the halfbeak is not a kind of a memorization and/or is an incidental does not hold if it is not a stalemate. sent14: if the lanyard is not bovine then that the fact that the stumblebum does effect and does glorify is wrong is not wrong. sent15: the Son is a bounce that is salable if the murderer is not a kind of a ablative. sent16: something does not defuse halfbeak and is ballistic if it is a kind of a corundom. sent17: if that the Son bounces and/or is regretful does not hold the macaroni is not a fritillary. sent18: the fact that if that something is not a parquetry but it is mesial is wrong then it is not a ablative is right.
sent8 -> int1: that the bichromate is a kind of non-unrepeatable thing that is not regretful is not false.; int1 -> int2: the bichromate is not regretful.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Son is a kind of a bounce and/or it is regretful is incorrect.; sent17 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the macaroni is a fritillary.
sent18 -> int4: the murderer is not a ablative if that it is not a kind of a parquetry and it is mesial is not correct.; sent11 -> int5: if the murderer does not defuse halfbeak the fact that it is not a parquetry and is mesial is not correct.; sent16 -> int6: if the halfbeak is a kind of a corundom then it does not defuse halfbeak and it is ballistic.; sent9 -> int7: the halfbeak is a corundom if that either it is not a memorization or it is incidental or both does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the macaroni is a kind of a fritillary. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the lanyard is not a bovine if the reliever does tag GIGO is right. sent2: the fact that the macaroni is a fritillary is true if the Son does bounce. sent3: the bichromate is not unrepeatable. sent4: if the halfbeak does not defuse halfbeak the murderer does not defuse halfbeak. sent5: the fact that everything does not tag Pujunan is true. sent6: the reliever tags GIGO if it defuses triangularity. sent7: if that the stumblebum is an effect that does glorify is incorrect then the halfbeak does not stalemate. sent8: everything is a kind of non-unrepeatable thing that is not regretful. sent9: if that something either is not a kind of a memorization or is incidental or both is incorrect then it is a corundom. sent10: the fact that the Son bounces or it is regretful or both is not correct if the bichromate is not regretful. sent11: if something does not defuse halfbeak then the fact that it is not a kind of a parquetry and it is mesial is not true. sent12: the Son is not regretful. sent13: that the halfbeak is not a kind of a memorization and/or is an incidental does not hold if it is not a stalemate. sent14: if the lanyard is not bovine then that the fact that the stumblebum does effect and does glorify is wrong is not wrong. sent15: the Son is a bounce that is salable if the murderer is not a kind of a ablative. sent16: something does not defuse halfbeak and is ballistic if it is a kind of a corundom. sent17: if that the Son bounces and/or is regretful does not hold the macaroni is not a fritillary. sent18: the fact that if that something is not a parquetry but it is mesial is wrong then it is not a ablative is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: that the bichromate is a kind of non-unrepeatable thing that is not regretful is not false.; int1 -> int2: the bichromate is not regretful.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Son is a kind of a bounce and/or it is regretful is incorrect.; sent17 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__