the fact that there is something such that if it is a sniff then it is basal and/or non-Olympics is false.
sent1: if the fact that something is not colloidal but it does wear is incorrect then it is not a kind of a wear. sent2: that the cyberart is rustless is not false if the rabbitfish is rustless and does deteriorate. sent3: that the sapphirine imprints hold. sent4: either the pentathlete does emote picturesqueness or it does not disavow beggar-my-neighbor or both. sent5: something is not familial if the fact that it is a kind of a DD that does disavow therm is false. sent6: the mammogram is a sniff. sent7: if something is not a wear then it is Olympics and it is not basal. sent8: the fact that the cyberart is a litter is not incorrect. sent9: if that the pentathlete is a sniff is right then it either is basal or is Olympics or both. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a sniff it is basal and/or it is Olympics. sent11: if something is not a electrodynamometer then the fact that it is a kind of a DD that does disavow therm is not correct. sent12: the rabbitfish is a kind of non-rustless thing that deteriorates if there exists something such that it is an imprint. sent13: the pentathlete is not basal if the cyberart is Olympics but it is not basal. sent14: the fact that the pentathlete is basal is true if it is a sniff. sent15: if something that is rustless is a litter the fact that it is not a kind of a electrodynamometer is correct. sent16: if that the songbird amounts is not false it is a litter. sent17: that something is not a sniff and is a veto is wrong if it is not basal. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kin is true it either is prandial or emotes cyme or both. sent19: if the pentathlete does drink Saul then it is a Owensboro and/or it books. sent20: that something is not colloidal but it is a wear is false if it is not familial. sent21: the Bostonian is a kind of a veto if the fact that the pentathlete is not a kind of a sniff and does veto is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pentathlete does sniff.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the pentathlete is basal.; int1 -> int2: the pentathlete is basal or it is not Olympics or both.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the pentathlete does sniff either it is basal or it is not Olympics or both.; int3 -> hypothesis;
that the Bostonian does veto is not false.
sent17 -> int4: if the pentathlete is not basal then the fact that it is not a sniff and is a veto does not hold.; sent7 -> int5: the cyberart is Olympics but it is not basal if it is not a wear.; sent1 -> int6: the cyberart does not wear if that it is not colloidal but a wear is not right.; sent20 -> int7: the fact that the cyberart is a kind of non-colloidal thing that is a wear is not true if it is not familial.; sent5 -> int8: the cyberart is not familial if that it is a kind of a DD that does disavow therm is not correct.; sent11 -> int9: if the cyberart is not a electrodynamometer then the fact that it is a DD and it disavows therm is not correct.; sent15 -> int10: the fact that the cyberart is not a electrodynamometer is not incorrect if it is rustless thing that litters.; sent3 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it imprints is correct.; int11 & sent12 -> int12: the rabbitfish is not rustless but it deteriorates.; sent2 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the cyberart is not rustless is false.; int13 & sent8 -> int14: the cyberart is rustless and does litter.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the cyberart is not a electrodynamometer.; int9 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the cyberart is a DD and it disavows therm is not right.; int8 & int16 -> int17: the cyberart is not familial.; int7 & int17 -> int18: that the cyberart is a kind of non-colloidal thing that does wear is incorrect.; int6 & int18 -> int19: the cyberart does not wear.; int5 & int19 -> int20: the cyberart is Olympics but it is non-basal.; sent13 & int20 -> int21: the fact that the pentathlete is not basal is right.; int4 & int21 -> int22: that the pentathlete is not a kind of a sniff but it does veto is not true.; sent21 & int22 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a sniff then it is basal and/or non-Olympics is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not colloidal but it does wear is incorrect then it is not a kind of a wear. sent2: that the cyberart is rustless is not false if the rabbitfish is rustless and does deteriorate. sent3: that the sapphirine imprints hold. sent4: either the pentathlete does emote picturesqueness or it does not disavow beggar-my-neighbor or both. sent5: something is not familial if the fact that it is a kind of a DD that does disavow therm is false. sent6: the mammogram is a sniff. sent7: if something is not a wear then it is Olympics and it is not basal. sent8: the fact that the cyberart is a litter is not incorrect. sent9: if that the pentathlete is a sniff is right then it either is basal or is Olympics or both. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a sniff it is basal and/or it is Olympics. sent11: if something is not a electrodynamometer then the fact that it is a kind of a DD that does disavow therm is not correct. sent12: the rabbitfish is a kind of non-rustless thing that deteriorates if there exists something such that it is an imprint. sent13: the pentathlete is not basal if the cyberart is Olympics but it is not basal. sent14: the fact that the pentathlete is basal is true if it is a sniff. sent15: if something that is rustless is a litter the fact that it is not a kind of a electrodynamometer is correct. sent16: if that the songbird amounts is not false it is a litter. sent17: that something is not a sniff and is a veto is wrong if it is not basal. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kin is true it either is prandial or emotes cyme or both. sent19: if the pentathlete does drink Saul then it is a Owensboro and/or it books. sent20: that something is not colloidal but it is a wear is false if it is not familial. sent21: the Bostonian is a kind of a veto if the fact that the pentathlete is not a kind of a sniff and does veto is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pentathlete does sniff.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the pentathlete is basal.; int1 -> int2: the pentathlete is basal or it is not Olympics or both.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the pentathlete does sniff either it is basal or it is not Olympics or both.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__