the fact that if the fact that the coalescence happens is right the nontaxableness does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the stockpiling and the crunch happens if the coalescence does not occur. sent2: that the ambiversiveness does not occur and/or the suppling pipeline does not occur is true. sent3: that the stockpiling does not occur and/or the crunch does not occur is not true. sent4: if the incompressibleness occurs then the suppling patterned occurs and the swimming Argyreia does not occur. sent5: the nontaxableness happens. sent6: the decalescence occurs. sent7: the nontaxableness does not occur if the crunching happens and the coalescence happens. sent8: that the nontaxableness occurs and the hatting occurs is triggered by that the splashiness does not occur. sent9: either the stockpiling does not occur or the crunching happens or both. sent10: the headmistressship does not occur and the elegantness does not occur if the suppling patterned happens. sent11: the nontaxableness happens if the crunching and the coalescence happens. sent12: the sop does not occur. sent13: that not the trophotropicness but the opinion happens leads to that the splashiness does not occur. sent14: the stockpiling happens and/or the crunch does not occur. sent15: that the stockpiling occurs results in the implicationalness. sent16: the paring DBA happens. sent17: the nontaxableness occurs if the coalescence occurs. sent18: that the elegantness does not occur but the nontaxableness occurs prevents that the coalescence happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crunching does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: either the stockpiling does not occur or the crunch does not occur or both.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the crunch occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the coalescence happens.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: the crunch and the coalescence happens.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the nontaxableness does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the implicationalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fact that the coalescence happens is right the nontaxableness does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the stockpiling and the crunch happens if the coalescence does not occur. sent2: that the ambiversiveness does not occur and/or the suppling pipeline does not occur is true. sent3: that the stockpiling does not occur and/or the crunch does not occur is not true. sent4: if the incompressibleness occurs then the suppling patterned occurs and the swimming Argyreia does not occur. sent5: the nontaxableness happens. sent6: the decalescence occurs. sent7: the nontaxableness does not occur if the crunching happens and the coalescence happens. sent8: that the nontaxableness occurs and the hatting occurs is triggered by that the splashiness does not occur. sent9: either the stockpiling does not occur or the crunching happens or both. sent10: the headmistressship does not occur and the elegantness does not occur if the suppling patterned happens. sent11: the nontaxableness happens if the crunching and the coalescence happens. sent12: the sop does not occur. sent13: that not the trophotropicness but the opinion happens leads to that the splashiness does not occur. sent14: the stockpiling happens and/or the crunch does not occur. sent15: that the stockpiling occurs results in the implicationalness. sent16: the paring DBA happens. sent17: the nontaxableness occurs if the coalescence occurs. sent18: that the elegantness does not occur but the nontaxableness occurs prevents that the coalescence happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crunching does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: either the stockpiling does not occur or the crunch does not occur or both.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the crunch occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the coalescence happens.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: the crunch and the coalescence happens.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the nontaxableness does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__