both the non-squareness and the fault occurs.
sent1: the cautioning does not occur if the fact that the attempt happens and the allantoicness happens does not hold. sent2: that the retrieval does not occur is brought about by that the garlickiness happens and the square occurs. sent3: that the fault happens and the manual happens is caused by that the ushering echinocactus does not occur. sent4: the retrieval occurs. sent5: the exhilarating rheumatism occurs. sent6: the ushering echinocactus does not occur. sent7: if the Appalachianness happens then the fact that the garlickiness happens is not incorrect. sent8: that the attempt happens and the allantoicness happens is not true.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the cautioning does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the squareness happens.; sent3 & sent6 -> int2: the fault occurs and the manualness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the fault occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = both the non-squareness and the fault occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the cautioning does not occur if the fact that the attempt happens and the allantoicness happens does not hold. sent2: that the retrieval does not occur is brought about by that the garlickiness happens and the square occurs. sent3: that the fault happens and the manual happens is caused by that the ushering echinocactus does not occur. sent4: the retrieval occurs. sent5: the exhilarating rheumatism occurs. sent6: the ushering echinocactus does not occur. sent7: if the Appalachianness happens then the fact that the garlickiness happens is not incorrect. sent8: that the attempt happens and the allantoicness happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the cautioning does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the squareness happens.; sent3 & sent6 -> int2: the fault occurs and the manualness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the fault occurs.; __UNKNOWN__