the bilingual is a kind of a homicide.
sent1: if something does not harden zoanthropy but it is a primate it is a homicide. sent2: the hodman is a kind of a quahog if the jugale is subcortical. sent3: everything does harden zoanthropy and is a primate. sent4: if something is not preclinical then that it is not a homicide is right. sent5: if that the ergonovine is not a wholesale and includes tahini is wrong the acid does not includes tahini. sent6: if something hardens zoanthropy then it is subcortical. sent7: something hisses and is preclinical if it does not include tahini. sent8: if the acid is a hiss and it is preclinical then the arm is not a hiss. sent9: if the arm is not a hiss then the stunt is a quahog. sent10: the fact that the bilingual is not preclinical is not wrong if either the hodman does hiss or it is a quahog or both.
sent3 -> int1: the jugale does harden zoanthropy and is a kind of a primate.; int1 -> int2: the jugale hardens zoanthropy.; sent6 -> int3: if the jugale hardens zoanthropy that it is subcortical is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the jugale is subcortical.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the hodman is a quahog.; int5 -> int6: the hodman hisses or it is a kind of a quahog or both.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the bilingual is not preclinical.; sent4 -> int8: if the bilingual is not preclinical then it is not a kind of a homicide.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the bilingual is a homicide.
sent1 -> int9: if the bilingual does not harden zoanthropy and is a kind of a primate then it is a homicide.; sent7 -> int10: if the acid does not include tahini then it hisses and it is preclinical.;
$hypothesis$ = the bilingual is a kind of a homicide. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not harden zoanthropy but it is a primate it is a homicide. sent2: the hodman is a kind of a quahog if the jugale is subcortical. sent3: everything does harden zoanthropy and is a primate. sent4: if something is not preclinical then that it is not a homicide is right. sent5: if that the ergonovine is not a wholesale and includes tahini is wrong the acid does not includes tahini. sent6: if something hardens zoanthropy then it is subcortical. sent7: something hisses and is preclinical if it does not include tahini. sent8: if the acid is a hiss and it is preclinical then the arm is not a hiss. sent9: if the arm is not a hiss then the stunt is a quahog. sent10: the fact that the bilingual is not preclinical is not wrong if either the hodman does hiss or it is a quahog or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the jugale does harden zoanthropy and is a kind of a primate.; int1 -> int2: the jugale hardens zoanthropy.; sent6 -> int3: if the jugale hardens zoanthropy that it is subcortical is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the jugale is subcortical.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the hodman is a quahog.; int5 -> int6: the hodman hisses or it is a kind of a quahog or both.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the bilingual is not preclinical.; sent4 -> int8: if the bilingual is not preclinical then it is not a kind of a homicide.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__