the wheellessness does not occur.
sent1: the holisticness does not occur if the fact that the holisticness happens and the emulsifying hitchhiker does not occur is false. sent2: the holisticness happens. sent3: the fact that the remodeling peregrination and the homemadeness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the holisticness does not occur then the Ascension does not occur and the discourteousness does not occur. sent5: the militainment occurs and the wheellessness happens if the Ascension does not occur. sent6: if the adjoining Plymouth does not occur then the fact that the fact that the holisticness occurs and the emulsifying hitchhiker does not occur is not false is false. sent7: the wheellessness does not occur if the militainment does not occur. sent8: the launch or the transactinide or both occurs if the freshening does not occur. sent9: if the anachronism does not occur then that the uppercaseness occurs and/or the emulsifying panache does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the remodeling peregrination occurs then the Ascension happens. sent11: that both the formalness and the militainment occurs is caused by that the Ascension does not occur. sent12: the fact that the fact that not the remodeling peregrination but the homemadeness happens hold is wrong. sent13: both the holisticness and the discourteousness occurs. sent14: if the declarativeness does not occur then the freshening does not occur. sent15: that both the Ascension and the militainment occurs prevents the discourteousness. sent16: the declarativeness does not occur if the fact that the uppercaseness occurs and/or the emulsifying panache does not occur is wrong. sent17: if the adjoining Plymouth occurs the holisticness occurs and/or the emulsifying hitchhiker does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the militainment occurs.; sent13 -> int1: the discourteousness occurs.;
that the informalness does not occur is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the wheellessness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the holisticness does not occur if the fact that the holisticness happens and the emulsifying hitchhiker does not occur is false. sent2: the holisticness happens. sent3: the fact that the remodeling peregrination and the homemadeness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the holisticness does not occur then the Ascension does not occur and the discourteousness does not occur. sent5: the militainment occurs and the wheellessness happens if the Ascension does not occur. sent6: if the adjoining Plymouth does not occur then the fact that the fact that the holisticness occurs and the emulsifying hitchhiker does not occur is not false is false. sent7: the wheellessness does not occur if the militainment does not occur. sent8: the launch or the transactinide or both occurs if the freshening does not occur. sent9: if the anachronism does not occur then that the uppercaseness occurs and/or the emulsifying panache does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the remodeling peregrination occurs then the Ascension happens. sent11: that both the formalness and the militainment occurs is caused by that the Ascension does not occur. sent12: the fact that the fact that not the remodeling peregrination but the homemadeness happens hold is wrong. sent13: both the holisticness and the discourteousness occurs. sent14: if the declarativeness does not occur then the freshening does not occur. sent15: that both the Ascension and the militainment occurs prevents the discourteousness. sent16: the declarativeness does not occur if the fact that the uppercaseness occurs and/or the emulsifying panache does not occur is wrong. sent17: if the adjoining Plymouth occurs the holisticness occurs and/or the emulsifying hitchhiker does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the militainment occurs.; sent13 -> int1: the discourteousness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__