the argentinosaur does not concretize gurgle and/or does concretize Pythius.
sent1: the bottle is both not prolix and nonsteroidal. sent2: the labetalol does concretize gurgle. sent3: that something strikes express but it is not Peruvian if it does glamorize transcendentalism is not wrong. sent4: if something is a kind of a cortisone then it concretizes Pythius. sent5: the labetalol either does not concretize Pythius or concretizes gurgle or both. sent6: the cordgrass glamorizes touched if the fact that the bottle does not glamorizes touched and is not a re-formation is false. sent7: if the Savara is a cortisone the labetalol does concretize Pythius. sent8: the fieldfare concretizes Pythius. sent9: if the Savara is a cortisone the labetalol does not concretize Pythius and/or it is a cortisone. sent10: the argentinosaur either is a kind of a cortisone or concretizes gurgle or both. sent11: if the labetalol concretizes Pythius then either the argentinosaur does not concretize gurgle or it does concretizes Pythius or both. sent12: the Savara is not geographic if the labetalol does strike express and is not a Peruvian. sent13: if the fact that the bottle is not prolix hold the fact that it does not glamorize touched and is not a re-formation is wrong. sent14: that the Savara is geographic is not wrong. sent15: that something does not concretize gurgle or it concretizes Pythius or both is not correct if the fact that it is not a cortisone is correct. sent16: the fact that the Savara is a cortisone that is not non-geographic is not wrong.
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the Savara is a kind of a cortisone hold.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the labetalol concretizes Pythius.; sent11 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the escort does concretize Pythius.
sent4 -> int3: the escort concretizes Pythius if it is a cortisone.;
$hypothesis$ = the argentinosaur does not concretize gurgle and/or does concretize Pythius. ; $context$ = sent1: the bottle is both not prolix and nonsteroidal. sent2: the labetalol does concretize gurgle. sent3: that something strikes express but it is not Peruvian if it does glamorize transcendentalism is not wrong. sent4: if something is a kind of a cortisone then it concretizes Pythius. sent5: the labetalol either does not concretize Pythius or concretizes gurgle or both. sent6: the cordgrass glamorizes touched if the fact that the bottle does not glamorizes touched and is not a re-formation is false. sent7: if the Savara is a cortisone the labetalol does concretize Pythius. sent8: the fieldfare concretizes Pythius. sent9: if the Savara is a cortisone the labetalol does not concretize Pythius and/or it is a cortisone. sent10: the argentinosaur either is a kind of a cortisone or concretizes gurgle or both. sent11: if the labetalol concretizes Pythius then either the argentinosaur does not concretize gurgle or it does concretizes Pythius or both. sent12: the Savara is not geographic if the labetalol does strike express and is not a Peruvian. sent13: if the fact that the bottle is not prolix hold the fact that it does not glamorize touched and is not a re-formation is wrong. sent14: that the Savara is geographic is not wrong. sent15: that something does not concretize gurgle or it concretizes Pythius or both is not correct if the fact that it is not a cortisone is correct. sent16: the fact that the Savara is a cortisone that is not non-geographic is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the Savara is a kind of a cortisone hold.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the labetalol concretizes Pythius.; sent11 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__