the storax does render genocide.
sent1: if the bricklayer is not polychromatic then the storax renders genocide and is crosswise. sent2: the fact that everything is crosswise and barytic hold. sent3: if the fact that the nuisance is not Slavonic but it is a canicule does not hold then the haloform is not a rough. sent4: the storax does not render genocide if the paleolith is allophonic and/or it is not planetary. sent5: if a non-Slavonic thing is a canicule then it is not polychromatic. sent6: the fact that the haloform is barytic is true. sent7: the bricklayer is non-crosswise if the nuisance is not polychromatic. sent8: if the haloform is not a rough then the paleolith is allophonic or it is not planetary or both.
sent5 -> int1: the nuisance is not polychromatic if it is not Slavonic and it is a kind of a canicule.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nuisance is not Slavonic but it is a canicule.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the nuisance is not polychromatic is not wrong.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the bricklayer is not crosswise.; sent2 -> int4: the bricklayer is not non-crosswise and it is barytic.; int4 -> int5: the bricklayer is crosswise.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the fact that the nuisance is non-Slavonic thing that is a kind of a canicule is false hold.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the haloform is non-rough.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the paleolith is allophonic and/or it is not planetary.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the storax does render genocide.
$hypothesis$ = the storax does render genocide. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bricklayer is not polychromatic then the storax renders genocide and is crosswise. sent2: the fact that everything is crosswise and barytic hold. sent3: if the fact that the nuisance is not Slavonic but it is a canicule does not hold then the haloform is not a rough. sent4: the storax does not render genocide if the paleolith is allophonic and/or it is not planetary. sent5: if a non-Slavonic thing is a canicule then it is not polychromatic. sent6: the fact that the haloform is barytic is true. sent7: the bricklayer is non-crosswise if the nuisance is not polychromatic. sent8: if the haloform is not a rough then the paleolith is allophonic or it is not planetary or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the nuisance is not polychromatic if it is not Slavonic and it is a kind of a canicule.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nuisance is not Slavonic but it is a canicule.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the nuisance is not polychromatic is not wrong.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the bricklayer is not crosswise.; sent2 -> int4: the bricklayer is not non-crosswise and it is barytic.; int4 -> int5: the bricklayer is crosswise.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the fact that the nuisance is non-Slavonic thing that is a kind of a canicule is false hold.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the haloform is non-rough.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the paleolith is allophonic and/or it is not planetary.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__