the unifying does not occur.
sent1: that the veterinariness occurs and the eversion does not occur is caused by that the thermogravimetry occurs. sent2: if the ammoniating Philaenus happens the clanking coke but not the Tyroleanness happens. sent3: if the neutrality does not occur either the clanking peppermint happens or the permeating does not occur or both. sent4: the addition does not occur. sent5: the hematopoieticness happens. sent6: that the minorness happens is correct. sent7: if the anemometricness happens the clanking peppermint occurs but the neutrality does not occur. sent8: the permeating happens. sent9: the anemometricness happens. sent10: if the electronicsness occurs the barbarization does not occur. sent11: the clanking peppermint is prevented by that both the permeating and the unifying occurs. sent12: the proconsularness happens. sent13: the skit does not occur if the ATM occurs and the ammoniating discard occurs. sent14: if that the unifying does not occur and the enema does not occur is false then the enema happens. sent15: that the unifying does not occur and the enema does not occur is wrong if the fact that the permeating does not occur is not wrong. sent16: the clanking tidemark happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unifying happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the permeating occurs and the unifying happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the clanking peppermint does not occur.; sent7 & sent9 -> int3: the clanking peppermint but not the neutrality occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the clanking peppermint happens is not wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the unifying happens.
$hypothesis$ = the unifying does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the veterinariness occurs and the eversion does not occur is caused by that the thermogravimetry occurs. sent2: if the ammoniating Philaenus happens the clanking coke but not the Tyroleanness happens. sent3: if the neutrality does not occur either the clanking peppermint happens or the permeating does not occur or both. sent4: the addition does not occur. sent5: the hematopoieticness happens. sent6: that the minorness happens is correct. sent7: if the anemometricness happens the clanking peppermint occurs but the neutrality does not occur. sent8: the permeating happens. sent9: the anemometricness happens. sent10: if the electronicsness occurs the barbarization does not occur. sent11: the clanking peppermint is prevented by that both the permeating and the unifying occurs. sent12: the proconsularness happens. sent13: the skit does not occur if the ATM occurs and the ammoniating discard occurs. sent14: if that the unifying does not occur and the enema does not occur is false then the enema happens. sent15: that the unifying does not occur and the enema does not occur is wrong if the fact that the permeating does not occur is not wrong. sent16: the clanking tidemark happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unifying happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the permeating occurs and the unifying happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the clanking peppermint does not occur.; sent7 & sent9 -> int3: the clanking peppermint but not the neutrality occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the clanking peppermint happens is not wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__