the theist happens.
sent1: the midwifery and/or that the recitation happens is caused by that the calorimetry does not occur. sent2: the nudging does not occur if the fact that not the midwifery but the nudging occurs is wrong. sent3: if the kismet does not occur the recitation occurs and the monologuizing happens. sent4: the monologuizing happens. sent5: the anureticness does not occur and the organizing cutin does not occur. sent6: that the organizing Brachycome occurs and the midwifery occurs leads to that the recitation does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the organizing Brachycome does not occur is not incorrect that not the midwifery but the nudging happens is incorrect. sent8: the kismet does not occur. sent9: the kismet occurs if the organizing cutin does not occur and the prehistoricness does not occur. sent10: that the monologuizing occurs and the kismet occurs prevents that the calorimetry happens. sent11: the monologuizing happens if the kismet does not occur. sent12: the fact that that the midwifery does not occur causes the calorimetry is true. sent13: that the theistness does not occur is prevented by the calorimetry. sent14: the organizing Brachycome occurs. sent15: the calorimetry does not occur if the theistness but not the monologuizing happens. sent16: that the theist does not occur is triggered by that the theist does not occur and/or that the organizing Brachycome does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the midwifery occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the organizing Brachycome and the midwifery occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the recitation does not occur.; sent3 & sent8 -> int3: the recitation happens and the monologuizing occurs.; int3 -> int4: the recitation happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the midwifery does not occur.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the calorimetry happens.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the nudge does not occur.
sent5 -> int8: the organizing cutin does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the theist happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the midwifery and/or that the recitation happens is caused by that the calorimetry does not occur. sent2: the nudging does not occur if the fact that not the midwifery but the nudging occurs is wrong. sent3: if the kismet does not occur the recitation occurs and the monologuizing happens. sent4: the monologuizing happens. sent5: the anureticness does not occur and the organizing cutin does not occur. sent6: that the organizing Brachycome occurs and the midwifery occurs leads to that the recitation does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the organizing Brachycome does not occur is not incorrect that not the midwifery but the nudging happens is incorrect. sent8: the kismet does not occur. sent9: the kismet occurs if the organizing cutin does not occur and the prehistoricness does not occur. sent10: that the monologuizing occurs and the kismet occurs prevents that the calorimetry happens. sent11: the monologuizing happens if the kismet does not occur. sent12: the fact that that the midwifery does not occur causes the calorimetry is true. sent13: that the theistness does not occur is prevented by the calorimetry. sent14: the organizing Brachycome occurs. sent15: the calorimetry does not occur if the theistness but not the monologuizing happens. sent16: that the theist does not occur is triggered by that the theist does not occur and/or that the organizing Brachycome does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the midwifery occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the organizing Brachycome and the midwifery occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the recitation does not occur.; sent3 & sent8 -> int3: the recitation happens and the monologuizing occurs.; int3 -> int4: the recitation happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the midwifery does not occur.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the calorimetry happens.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__