the cope is not a kind of a Fornax.
sent1: if something is Stravinskyan then it pinks glut. sent2: there is something such that it is not a wheelbase. sent3: there exists something such that it is postwar. sent4: something is Pythagorean thing that is a kind of a Melogale. sent5: something is not a wheelbase but postwar. sent6: there is something such that it does net. sent7: the plaster is Stravinskyan. sent8: if the fact that the plaster is not a wheelbase is correct then that it is postwar and it does pink glut does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the plaster does not pink glut is not incorrect it does not net and it is a kind of an elective. sent10: there exists something such that it is unobtrusive. sent11: the plaster is a kind of a net if it is Stravinskyan. sent12: the fact that something is a wheelbase that is postwar is not incorrect. sent13: if there exists something such that it is both not non-net and unobtrusive the fiberscope is an elective. sent14: the cope is not a kind of a Fornax if the plaster is not Stravinskyan. sent15: the plaster does not pink glut if that it is postwar thing that does pink glut does not hold. sent16: the fact that something is Stravinskyan and is not unobtrusive is not right if it is not a kind of a net. sent17: the cope is a Fornax if that the fiberscope does pink glut is not false. sent18: if the plaster is unobtrusive then it is not non-elective. sent19: if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a wheelbase and is postwar is not false the plaster is unobtrusive. sent20: the cope is a kind of an elective if something that does not pink glut is a kind of a Fornax. sent21: if the plaster is a kind of an elective then the fact that the fiberscope is unobtrusive hold. sent22: the fact that if the fiberscope is unobtrusive then the plaster is elective is not incorrect. sent23: the Orleanist is Stravinskyan. sent24: something pinks glut if that it is elective is not false. sent25: if there is something such that it is elective a net then that the fiberscope is unobtrusive is not incorrect.
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the plaster does net.; sent5 & sent19 -> int2: the plaster is unobtrusive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the plaster is a net and it is not obtrusive.; int3 -> int4: something is a net that is unobtrusive.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the fiberscope is elective.; sent24 -> int6: if the fiberscope is elective it pinks glut.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fiberscope does pink glut.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the cope is not a Fornax.
sent16 -> int8: if the plaster is not net then that it is Stravinskyan thing that is not unobtrusive is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the cope is not a kind of a Fornax. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is Stravinskyan then it pinks glut. sent2: there is something such that it is not a wheelbase. sent3: there exists something such that it is postwar. sent4: something is Pythagorean thing that is a kind of a Melogale. sent5: something is not a wheelbase but postwar. sent6: there is something such that it does net. sent7: the plaster is Stravinskyan. sent8: if the fact that the plaster is not a wheelbase is correct then that it is postwar and it does pink glut does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the plaster does not pink glut is not incorrect it does not net and it is a kind of an elective. sent10: there exists something such that it is unobtrusive. sent11: the plaster is a kind of a net if it is Stravinskyan. sent12: the fact that something is a wheelbase that is postwar is not incorrect. sent13: if there exists something such that it is both not non-net and unobtrusive the fiberscope is an elective. sent14: the cope is not a kind of a Fornax if the plaster is not Stravinskyan. sent15: the plaster does not pink glut if that it is postwar thing that does pink glut does not hold. sent16: the fact that something is Stravinskyan and is not unobtrusive is not right if it is not a kind of a net. sent17: the cope is a Fornax if that the fiberscope does pink glut is not false. sent18: if the plaster is unobtrusive then it is not non-elective. sent19: if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a wheelbase and is postwar is not false the plaster is unobtrusive. sent20: the cope is a kind of an elective if something that does not pink glut is a kind of a Fornax. sent21: if the plaster is a kind of an elective then the fact that the fiberscope is unobtrusive hold. sent22: the fact that if the fiberscope is unobtrusive then the plaster is elective is not incorrect. sent23: the Orleanist is Stravinskyan. sent24: something pinks glut if that it is elective is not false. sent25: if there is something such that it is elective a net then that the fiberscope is unobtrusive is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the plaster does net.; sent5 & sent19 -> int2: the plaster is unobtrusive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the plaster is a net and it is not obtrusive.; int3 -> int4: something is a net that is unobtrusive.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the fiberscope is elective.; sent24 -> int6: if the fiberscope is elective it pinks glut.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fiberscope does pink glut.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__