the sanitariness does not occur.
sent1: the impinging Zurich happens. sent2: if the impinging dander occurs then the fact that not the dipolarness but the tartaricness happens is false. sent3: the sanitariness does not occur if the fact that the fact that both the pleasure and the impinging goby occurs is not true is right. sent4: the siderealness does not occur. sent5: if the pleasure does not occur then not the groping but the pyknoticness occurs. sent6: if the bubalineness does not occur then that not the blacklisting Bufonidae but the impinging Zurich happens does not hold. sent7: the dipolarness happens. sent8: the stabling does not occur. sent9: either the pyknoticness occurs or the impinging dander happens or both if the dipolarness happens. sent10: if the pleasure occurs then the impinging goby occurs. sent11: that the non-pyknoticness and/or the impinging dander happens is brought about by that the dipolarness occurs. sent12: that the non-calculableness and the succession occurs is brought about by that the unbreakableness occurs. sent13: if the impinging goby occurs the tartaricness occurs. sent14: if the amendment does not occur then the impinging dander occurs and the predominating does not occur. sent15: the fact that the sanitariness happens hold if the tartaricness occurs. sent16: if the fact that the calculableness does not occur is right that both the headway and the non-subjunctiveness happens is false. sent17: the unbreakableness occurs and the exodus happens if the impinging Icelander does not occur. sent18: the fact that the bubalineness does not occur is right if that the headway but not the subjunctiveness occurs is incorrect. sent19: the amendment does not occur if that the blacklisting Bufonidae does not occur and the impinging Zurich occurs is wrong. sent20: if the non-pyknoticness or the impinging dander or both occurs the fact that the non-pyknotic does not occur is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pleasure does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: not the grope but the pyknoticness happens.; int1 -> int2: the pyknoticness happens.; sent11 & sent7 -> int3: the pyknoticness does not occur and/or the impinging dander occurs.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the pyknoticness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the pleasure happens.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the impinging goby occurs.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the tartaricness occurs.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the sanitariness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the sanitariness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the impinging Zurich happens. sent2: if the impinging dander occurs then the fact that not the dipolarness but the tartaricness happens is false. sent3: the sanitariness does not occur if the fact that the fact that both the pleasure and the impinging goby occurs is not true is right. sent4: the siderealness does not occur. sent5: if the pleasure does not occur then not the groping but the pyknoticness occurs. sent6: if the bubalineness does not occur then that not the blacklisting Bufonidae but the impinging Zurich happens does not hold. sent7: the dipolarness happens. sent8: the stabling does not occur. sent9: either the pyknoticness occurs or the impinging dander happens or both if the dipolarness happens. sent10: if the pleasure occurs then the impinging goby occurs. sent11: that the non-pyknoticness and/or the impinging dander happens is brought about by that the dipolarness occurs. sent12: that the non-calculableness and the succession occurs is brought about by that the unbreakableness occurs. sent13: if the impinging goby occurs the tartaricness occurs. sent14: if the amendment does not occur then the impinging dander occurs and the predominating does not occur. sent15: the fact that the sanitariness happens hold if the tartaricness occurs. sent16: if the fact that the calculableness does not occur is right that both the headway and the non-subjunctiveness happens is false. sent17: the unbreakableness occurs and the exodus happens if the impinging Icelander does not occur. sent18: the fact that the bubalineness does not occur is right if that the headway but not the subjunctiveness occurs is incorrect. sent19: the amendment does not occur if that the blacklisting Bufonidae does not occur and the impinging Zurich occurs is wrong. sent20: if the non-pyknoticness or the impinging dander or both occurs the fact that the non-pyknotic does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pleasure does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: not the grope but the pyknoticness happens.; int1 -> int2: the pyknoticness happens.; sent11 & sent7 -> int3: the pyknoticness does not occur and/or the impinging dander occurs.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the pyknoticness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the pleasure happens.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the impinging goby occurs.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the tartaricness occurs.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__