the fact that there exists something such that if it does not rabbet violation and it does not judder then it is not discernible is false.
sent1: if the commemorative does rabbet violation but it does not judder then the fact that it is not discernible is right. sent2: there is something such that if it is non-percussive and it is not inflexible then it does not rabbet distemper. sent3: the fact that the commemorative is not discernible hold if it does not rabbet violation and does judder. sent4: the commemorative does not rabbet violation if it is not thespian and it is a kind of a dejection. sent5: if the commemorative does not rabbet violation and it does not judder then it is not discernible. sent6: there is something such that if it does not rabbet violation and it does not judder then it is discernible. sent7: if the endameba is a kind of non-higher thing that judders then it is not serologic. sent8: if something that is not a lawrencium is not discernible then it is non-psychosexual.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the mistflower is not a lawrencium and not discernible then it is not psychosexual.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not rabbet violation and it does not judder then it is not discernible is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the commemorative does rabbet violation but it does not judder then the fact that it is not discernible is right. sent2: there is something such that if it is non-percussive and it is not inflexible then it does not rabbet distemper. sent3: the fact that the commemorative is not discernible hold if it does not rabbet violation and does judder. sent4: the commemorative does not rabbet violation if it is not thespian and it is a kind of a dejection. sent5: if the commemorative does not rabbet violation and it does not judder then it is not discernible. sent6: there is something such that if it does not rabbet violation and it does not judder then it is discernible. sent7: if the endameba is a kind of non-higher thing that judders then it is not serologic. sent8: if something that is not a lawrencium is not discernible then it is non-psychosexual. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__