the fact that either something breakfasts badger or it is a Valentine or both is not right.
sent1: either something bunts or it is a heartiness or both. sent2: there is something such that it is exteroceptive or is a fleshiness or both. sent3: the antique steeps. sent4: the aircraft does breakfast badger and/or it is a redwood. sent5: that the Alexandrian is a kind of a spruce that is not a Valentine is not correct if there exists something such that it does not spruce. sent6: the scarf is a Valentine or is a novelty or both. sent7: the antique is unpriestly. sent8: the Maldivian is a gong if the soixante-neuf is a kind of a convulsion. sent9: the antique is approachable and/or it is a kind of a Valentine. sent10: the antique is a kind of a Valentine. sent11: either the antique is trophotropic or it is a kind of a Ulanova or both. sent12: the antique is a gong. sent13: there exists something such that either it is apian or it is a iconology or both. sent14: the antique is a kind of a top if the Alexandrian does breakfast badger. sent15: the Telugu accepts Maldivian or breakfasts badger or both. sent16: if the fact that something spruces and is not a kind of a Valentine is false it breakfasts badger. sent17: a reveille is a convulsion. sent18: the nudnik is a kind of a Callithrix and/or it is unapproachable. sent19: the soixante-neuf is a reveille and it is a blinded.
sent10 -> int1: the antique does breakfast badger or it is a kind of a Valentine or both.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the antique does top.
sent16 -> int2: the Alexandrian does breakfast badger if that it is a spruce and it is not a Valentine is wrong.; sent17 -> int3: if the soixante-neuf is a reveille then it is a convulsion.; sent19 -> int4: the soixante-neuf is a kind of a reveille.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the soixante-neuf is a kind of a convulsion.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the Maldivian is a gong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either something breakfasts badger or it is a Valentine or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: either something bunts or it is a heartiness or both. sent2: there is something such that it is exteroceptive or is a fleshiness or both. sent3: the antique steeps. sent4: the aircraft does breakfast badger and/or it is a redwood. sent5: that the Alexandrian is a kind of a spruce that is not a Valentine is not correct if there exists something such that it does not spruce. sent6: the scarf is a Valentine or is a novelty or both. sent7: the antique is unpriestly. sent8: the Maldivian is a gong if the soixante-neuf is a kind of a convulsion. sent9: the antique is approachable and/or it is a kind of a Valentine. sent10: the antique is a kind of a Valentine. sent11: either the antique is trophotropic or it is a kind of a Ulanova or both. sent12: the antique is a gong. sent13: there exists something such that either it is apian or it is a iconology or both. sent14: the antique is a kind of a top if the Alexandrian does breakfast badger. sent15: the Telugu accepts Maldivian or breakfasts badger or both. sent16: if the fact that something spruces and is not a kind of a Valentine is false it breakfasts badger. sent17: a reveille is a convulsion. sent18: the nudnik is a kind of a Callithrix and/or it is unapproachable. sent19: the soixante-neuf is a reveille and it is a blinded. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the antique does breakfast badger or it is a kind of a Valentine or both.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__