the wonton is not brassy.
sent1: if the troche is not a femtochemistry it is a Dubuque and it does not jack owlet. sent2: if there exists something such that it is Epicurean then the trudger is not domiciliary. sent3: the wellpoint does not jack owlet if the troche is a Dubuque and does not jack owlet. sent4: that the stipe is Epicurean is true. sent5: that the troche is not a femtochemistry and jacks owlet is not right if there is something such that it is a Dubuque. sent6: that the troche does not jack owlet but it is exoergic is wrong if the fact that it is not a femtochemistry is incorrect. sent7: something is a Dubuque if that it does not panic jument and it does not rerun nothingness is not true. sent8: if the trudger is not domiciliary then that the hagfish is not a firestone and it does not jack martin is not right. sent9: if that something is not a femtochemistry but it jacks owlet does not hold then it does not bother. sent10: the fact that something does not bother and is a stoop is not correct if it is exoergic. sent11: the wellpoint jacks owlet if that that the wonton does not bother and is a stoop is false is right. sent12: the troche is not a femtochemistry. sent13: if the fact that the wellpoint is exoergic hold then the wonton is brassy. sent14: if something is exoergic then the fact that it does bother and does stoop is not correct. sent15: if the wellpoint does not bother it does not jack owlet. sent16: something jacks martin if that it is not a kind of a firestone and it does not jacks martin is false. sent17: that the owlet does not panic jument and does not rerun nothingness does not hold if the hagfish does jack martin.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wonton is brassy.; sent10 -> int1: if the wonton is not non-exoergic then the fact that it does not bother and it stoops does not hold.; sent1 & sent12 -> int2: the troche is a Dubuque and does not jack owlet.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the wellpoint does not jack owlet.;
the wonton is brassy.
sent9 -> int4: if that the troche is not a femtochemistry and does jack owlet is not true it does not bother.; sent7 -> int5: if the fact that the owlet does not panic jument and it does not rerun nothingness is not correct it is a Dubuque.; sent16 -> int6: the fact that the hagfish does jack martin is not incorrect if the fact that it is not a firestone and it does not jack martin does not hold.; sent4 -> int7: something is Epicurean.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the trudger is not domiciliary.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the hagfish is not a firestone and does not jack martin is wrong.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the hagfish jacks martin.; sent17 & int10 -> int11: that the owlet does not panic jument and it does not rerun nothingness is not true.; int5 & int11 -> int12: the owlet is a kind of a Dubuque.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Dubuque hold.; int13 & sent5 -> int14: the fact that the troche is not a femtochemistry but it jacks owlet is not true.; int4 & int14 -> int15: the troche does not bother.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it does not bother.;
$hypothesis$ = the wonton is not brassy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the troche is not a femtochemistry it is a Dubuque and it does not jack owlet. sent2: if there exists something such that it is Epicurean then the trudger is not domiciliary. sent3: the wellpoint does not jack owlet if the troche is a Dubuque and does not jack owlet. sent4: that the stipe is Epicurean is true. sent5: that the troche is not a femtochemistry and jacks owlet is not right if there is something such that it is a Dubuque. sent6: that the troche does not jack owlet but it is exoergic is wrong if the fact that it is not a femtochemistry is incorrect. sent7: something is a Dubuque if that it does not panic jument and it does not rerun nothingness is not true. sent8: if the trudger is not domiciliary then that the hagfish is not a firestone and it does not jack martin is not right. sent9: if that something is not a femtochemistry but it jacks owlet does not hold then it does not bother. sent10: the fact that something does not bother and is a stoop is not correct if it is exoergic. sent11: the wellpoint jacks owlet if that that the wonton does not bother and is a stoop is false is right. sent12: the troche is not a femtochemistry. sent13: if the fact that the wellpoint is exoergic hold then the wonton is brassy. sent14: if something is exoergic then the fact that it does bother and does stoop is not correct. sent15: if the wellpoint does not bother it does not jack owlet. sent16: something jacks martin if that it is not a kind of a firestone and it does not jacks martin is false. sent17: that the owlet does not panic jument and does not rerun nothingness does not hold if the hagfish does jack martin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wonton is brassy.; sent10 -> int1: if the wonton is not non-exoergic then the fact that it does not bother and it stoops does not hold.; sent1 & sent12 -> int2: the troche is a Dubuque and does not jack owlet.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the wellpoint does not jack owlet.; __UNKNOWN__