that if the alleviator is a kind of a tweeter the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera and does manhandle alleviator is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that it is nonoperational and does not manhandle animism. sent2: the nopal is not semiautobiographical if that the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera but it does manhandle alleviator does not hold. sent3: the nopal is not semiautobiographical if the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera and does manhandle alleviator. sent4: the countrywoman does not awe Alternanthera but it is bolographic. sent5: something does not aurify and is a pitilessness if it is a wisdom. sent6: the alleviator is not a kind of a tweeter and is semiautobiographical if the nopal doubles. sent7: the fact that the alleviator does double is true. sent8: the alleviator is not a tweeter if that the nopal is a kind of a wisdom and/or it does double does not hold. sent9: if something is not a tweeter then it is a doubles. sent10: the washcloth does awe Alternanthera and does manhandle alleviator. sent11: the washcloth is not a wisdom if the nopal is semiautobiographical. sent12: the washcloth manhandles alleviator if the alleviator is a kind of a tweeter. sent13: the fact that something is a wisdom and/or it does double is not correct if it is not semiautobiographical.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera but it does manhandle alleviator is wrong.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the nopal is not semiautobiographical.; sent13 -> int2: that the nopal is a kind of a wisdom or it is doubles or both is wrong if it is not semiautobiographical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the nopal is a wisdom and/or is a kind of a doubles is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the alleviator is not a kind of a tweeter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the alleviator is a tweeter.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera and manhandles alleviator.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the nopal does not aurify but it is a pitilessness hold.
sent5 -> int7: if the nopal is a kind of a wisdom it does not aurify and is a kind of a pitilessness.; sent9 -> int8: the washcloth is not non-doubles if that it is not a kind of a tweeter is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the alleviator is a kind of a tweeter the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera and does manhandle alleviator is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is nonoperational and does not manhandle animism. sent2: the nopal is not semiautobiographical if that the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera but it does manhandle alleviator does not hold. sent3: the nopal is not semiautobiographical if the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera and does manhandle alleviator. sent4: the countrywoman does not awe Alternanthera but it is bolographic. sent5: something does not aurify and is a pitilessness if it is a wisdom. sent6: the alleviator is not a kind of a tweeter and is semiautobiographical if the nopal doubles. sent7: the fact that the alleviator does double is true. sent8: the alleviator is not a tweeter if that the nopal is a kind of a wisdom and/or it does double does not hold. sent9: if something is not a tweeter then it is a doubles. sent10: the washcloth does awe Alternanthera and does manhandle alleviator. sent11: the washcloth is not a wisdom if the nopal is semiautobiographical. sent12: the washcloth manhandles alleviator if the alleviator is a kind of a tweeter. sent13: the fact that something is a wisdom and/or it does double is not correct if it is not semiautobiographical. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera but it does manhandle alleviator is wrong.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the nopal is not semiautobiographical.; sent13 -> int2: that the nopal is a kind of a wisdom or it is doubles or both is wrong if it is not semiautobiographical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the nopal is a wisdom and/or is a kind of a doubles is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the alleviator is not a kind of a tweeter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the alleviator is a tweeter.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the washcloth does not awe Alternanthera and manhandles alleviator.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__