the coloration does not occur but the agonisticness occurs.
sent1: the fact that that the branchiness but not the housework occurs is not false is not true if the reliableness does not occur. sent2: the agonisticness occurs if the pedesis does not occur. sent3: if the mutter does not occur and the reopening whistle-blower does not occur then the pedesis does not occur. sent4: the concerning peafowl occurs and the pilarness occurs. sent5: the pilarness happens. sent6: not the coloration but the agonisticness occurs if the pedesis does not occur. sent7: if the movement occurs then the branchiness but not the housework occurs. sent8: the reopening whistle-blower does not occur. sent9: if the reliableness occurs and the concerning peafowl occurs then the mutter does not occur. sent10: if the concerning peafowl does not occur not the applying but the reliableness occurs. sent11: if the movement occurs then the fact that the housework does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reliableness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the branchiness but not the housework happens is incorrect.; sent4 -> int2: the concerning peafowl happens.;
the applying does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the coloration does not occur but the agonisticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the branchiness but not the housework occurs is not false is not true if the reliableness does not occur. sent2: the agonisticness occurs if the pedesis does not occur. sent3: if the mutter does not occur and the reopening whistle-blower does not occur then the pedesis does not occur. sent4: the concerning peafowl occurs and the pilarness occurs. sent5: the pilarness happens. sent6: not the coloration but the agonisticness occurs if the pedesis does not occur. sent7: if the movement occurs then the branchiness but not the housework occurs. sent8: the reopening whistle-blower does not occur. sent9: if the reliableness occurs and the concerning peafowl occurs then the mutter does not occur. sent10: if the concerning peafowl does not occur not the applying but the reliableness occurs. sent11: if the movement occurs then the fact that the housework does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reliableness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the branchiness but not the housework happens is incorrect.; sent4 -> int2: the concerning peafowl happens.; __UNKNOWN__