the Tamale is a kind of a SSRI if the specimen is a kind of a Carya.
sent1: the wisent is not non-rental and does unstrap CF. sent2: the fact that the ostrich is both not a SSRI and not a master is false. sent3: the fact that the ostrich is both a xenolith and not economics does not hold. sent4: the Tamale is a Ocyurus. sent5: something is an adolescent if it is a Mallophaga. sent6: if the fact that something is adolescent is true then it masters. sent7: the props is a Carya and it is a kind of a Krupp. sent8: the specimen is a kind of an adolescent if that the ostrich is a kind of a Carya is right. sent9: that the ostrich is not a kind of a Ocyurus and does master is wrong. sent10: that the ostrich is not a Ocyurus and does not master is not correct. sent11: something is economics thing that is a master. sent12: the fact that the Tamale is a SSRI is right if something is both economics and a Carya. sent13: that the Tamale is not a SSRI and it is not a kind of a Mallophaga is not correct. sent14: if the ostrich is a Carya then it is a kind of a Ocyurus. sent15: if that the ostrich is not a Ocyurus and it is not a master is not right then it is a Mallophaga. sent16: the bestiality is a kind of a SSRI. sent17: the fact that the Tamale is non-adolescent and it is not a SSRI is incorrect. sent18: that the Tamale is adolescent is not wrong. sent19: if the fact that the Tamale does master is true the ostrich is a SSRI. sent20: if the specimen is a Ocyurus then the ostrich is a Carya.
sent15 & sent10 -> int1: the ostrich is a Mallophaga.; sent5 -> int2: the ostrich is an adolescent if it is a kind of a Mallophaga.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ostrich is a kind of an adolescent.;
$hypothesis$ = the Tamale is a kind of a SSRI if the specimen is a kind of a Carya. ; $context$ = sent1: the wisent is not non-rental and does unstrap CF. sent2: the fact that the ostrich is both not a SSRI and not a master is false. sent3: the fact that the ostrich is both a xenolith and not economics does not hold. sent4: the Tamale is a Ocyurus. sent5: something is an adolescent if it is a Mallophaga. sent6: if the fact that something is adolescent is true then it masters. sent7: the props is a Carya and it is a kind of a Krupp. sent8: the specimen is a kind of an adolescent if that the ostrich is a kind of a Carya is right. sent9: that the ostrich is not a kind of a Ocyurus and does master is wrong. sent10: that the ostrich is not a Ocyurus and does not master is not correct. sent11: something is economics thing that is a master. sent12: the fact that the Tamale is a SSRI is right if something is both economics and a Carya. sent13: that the Tamale is not a SSRI and it is not a kind of a Mallophaga is not correct. sent14: if the ostrich is a Carya then it is a kind of a Ocyurus. sent15: if that the ostrich is not a Ocyurus and it is not a master is not right then it is a Mallophaga. sent16: the bestiality is a kind of a SSRI. sent17: the fact that the Tamale is non-adolescent and it is not a SSRI is incorrect. sent18: that the Tamale is adolescent is not wrong. sent19: if the fact that the Tamale does master is true the ostrich is a SSRI. sent20: if the specimen is a Ocyurus then the ostrich is a Carya. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent10 -> int1: the ostrich is a Mallophaga.; sent5 -> int2: the ostrich is an adolescent if it is a kind of a Mallophaga.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ostrich is a kind of an adolescent.; __UNKNOWN__