the fact that the canaliculus is not a oxtail and does not glare Acanthuridae does not hold.
sent1: if the hogan is not catalytic and it is not a Freon the gown is not inextinguishable. sent2: something is non-azotemic if that it is not a imperium and not a neuroplasty is wrong. sent3: if that something is azotemic and it is not inoffensive is not true then it is not inoffensive. sent4: that something is both not a imperium and not a neuroplasty does not hold if it geminates scrip. sent5: the photomicrograph does not rope Babyrousa and it is not a kind of a Freon if there is something such that it is not offensive. sent6: the fact that the canaliculus is not immature is correct. sent7: something is not a Freon if the fact that it is a Freon and it does glare loess does not hold. sent8: if that the Ingrian ropes braided but it is not offensive is not true then the canaliculus is not offensive. sent9: the canaliculus ropes braided. sent10: the fact that the canaliculus ropes braided and is azotemic is true. sent11: the canaliculus does not geminate dodge and does not rope crappie. sent12: the canaliculus is not a sower and is not a palmetto. sent13: everything is not catalytic. sent14: the reporter is not offensive. sent15: that something ropes braided but it is not offensive is not right if it is not azotemic. sent16: the myelocyte is not offensive. sent17: the canaliculus is not offensive and it is not a kind of a oxtail. sent18: the canaliculus is azotemic and it ropes braided. sent19: something is offensive if it is a oxtail. sent20: the canaliculus does not glare Acanthuridae but it does rope braided. sent21: there exists nothing that is a kind of a Freon and does glare loess.
sent17 -> int1: the canaliculus is not a oxtail.; sent20 -> int2: the canaliculus does not glare Acanthuridae.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the photomicrograph does not rope Babyrousa and is not a kind of a Freon.
sent18 -> int3: the canaliculus does rope braided.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the canaliculus is not a oxtail and does not glare Acanthuridae does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hogan is not catalytic and it is not a Freon the gown is not inextinguishable. sent2: something is non-azotemic if that it is not a imperium and not a neuroplasty is wrong. sent3: if that something is azotemic and it is not inoffensive is not true then it is not inoffensive. sent4: that something is both not a imperium and not a neuroplasty does not hold if it geminates scrip. sent5: the photomicrograph does not rope Babyrousa and it is not a kind of a Freon if there is something such that it is not offensive. sent6: the fact that the canaliculus is not immature is correct. sent7: something is not a Freon if the fact that it is a Freon and it does glare loess does not hold. sent8: if that the Ingrian ropes braided but it is not offensive is not true then the canaliculus is not offensive. sent9: the canaliculus ropes braided. sent10: the fact that the canaliculus ropes braided and is azotemic is true. sent11: the canaliculus does not geminate dodge and does not rope crappie. sent12: the canaliculus is not a sower and is not a palmetto. sent13: everything is not catalytic. sent14: the reporter is not offensive. sent15: that something ropes braided but it is not offensive is not right if it is not azotemic. sent16: the myelocyte is not offensive. sent17: the canaliculus is not offensive and it is not a kind of a oxtail. sent18: the canaliculus is azotemic and it ropes braided. sent19: something is offensive if it is a oxtail. sent20: the canaliculus does not glare Acanthuridae but it does rope braided. sent21: there exists nothing that is a kind of a Freon and does glare loess. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the canaliculus is not a oxtail.; sent20 -> int2: the canaliculus does not glare Acanthuridae.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__