the footwear is disobedient thing that does descry clocksmith.
sent1: if the dimity does not descry splat it is a retrospective. sent2: if the fact that something is a hectare hold then that either it is not a retrospective or it is non-ready-made or both is not right. sent3: the dimity is not retrospective but obedient if the footwear is retrospective. sent4: the dimity is retrospective. sent5: if that something does not descry splat hold it is a retrospective and not ready-made. sent6: something is not a seasoner. sent7: if the footwear is obedient then it is not a kind of a ready-made and descries clocksmith. sent8: something descries deafness and it does fumble if that it does not descry splat is right. sent9: something does not descry splat but it descries deafness if it is a kind of a fumble. sent10: there is something such that it is not obedient. sent11: there is something such that it is archangelic. sent12: if that the dimity is meridional and it is a Grotius is false the fact that it is not a Grotius hold. sent13: the clocksmith is not a kind of a cope if something does concretize Primaxin but it is not Christological. sent14: if the dimity is not obedient the footwear is not obedient. sent15: the fact that something is disobedient thing that descries clocksmith is wrong if it is a fumble. sent16: there is something such that that it does not descry clocksmith hold. sent17: if the fact that something is salivary and is a fumble is not right then it is not salivary. sent18: if there is something such that it is a kind of a retrospective and it is not a ready-made the clocksmith is not a hectare. sent19: something is a hectare and it does lace climatology if the fact that it is not a Grotius hold. sent20: something is not non-retrospective. sent21: there exists something such that it is retrospective thing that is a ready-made. sent22: if that the clocksmith either does descry deafness or is not obedient or both is not true then the dimity does not fumble. sent23: the footwear is non-obedient thing that does descry clocksmith if the dimity is not obedient. sent24: the clocksmith is a hectare.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dimity is obedient.; sent9 -> int1: if the dimity is a fumble it does not descry splat and it descries deafness.; sent5 -> int2: if the dimity does not descry splat it is a retrospective and it is not a ready-made.;
the fact that the footwear is not obedient but it descries clocksmith is not true.
sent15 -> int3: the fact that the footwear is not obedient and does descry clocksmith is not correct if the fact that it fumbles is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int4: if the footwear does not descry splat then it descries deafness and it does fumble.; sent2 -> int5: that either the dimity is not a kind of a retrospective or it is not ready-made or both is not right if it is a kind of a hectare.; sent19 -> int6: the dimity is a hectare and does lace climatology if the fact that it is not a Grotius hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the footwear is disobedient thing that does descry clocksmith. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dimity does not descry splat it is a retrospective. sent2: if the fact that something is a hectare hold then that either it is not a retrospective or it is non-ready-made or both is not right. sent3: the dimity is not retrospective but obedient if the footwear is retrospective. sent4: the dimity is retrospective. sent5: if that something does not descry splat hold it is a retrospective and not ready-made. sent6: something is not a seasoner. sent7: if the footwear is obedient then it is not a kind of a ready-made and descries clocksmith. sent8: something descries deafness and it does fumble if that it does not descry splat is right. sent9: something does not descry splat but it descries deafness if it is a kind of a fumble. sent10: there is something such that it is not obedient. sent11: there is something such that it is archangelic. sent12: if that the dimity is meridional and it is a Grotius is false the fact that it is not a Grotius hold. sent13: the clocksmith is not a kind of a cope if something does concretize Primaxin but it is not Christological. sent14: if the dimity is not obedient the footwear is not obedient. sent15: the fact that something is disobedient thing that descries clocksmith is wrong if it is a fumble. sent16: there is something such that that it does not descry clocksmith hold. sent17: if the fact that something is salivary and is a fumble is not right then it is not salivary. sent18: if there is something such that it is a kind of a retrospective and it is not a ready-made the clocksmith is not a hectare. sent19: something is a hectare and it does lace climatology if the fact that it is not a Grotius hold. sent20: something is not non-retrospective. sent21: there exists something such that it is retrospective thing that is a ready-made. sent22: if that the clocksmith either does descry deafness or is not obedient or both is not true then the dimity does not fumble. sent23: the footwear is non-obedient thing that does descry clocksmith if the dimity is not obedient. sent24: the clocksmith is a hectare. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dimity is obedient.; sent9 -> int1: if the dimity is a fumble it does not descry splat and it descries deafness.; sent5 -> int2: if the dimity does not descry splat it is a retrospective and it is not a ready-made.; __UNKNOWN__