that the fishhook is a kind of resistible thing that is retractile is wrong if the geyser is not non-chondritic.
sent1: the fishhook is not resistless but retractile. sent2: the fishhook is not resistless but retractile if the borate does tweeze Ariidae. sent3: the fact that the borate does not tweeze Ariidae but it is chondritic does not hold if that the geyser is retractile is true. sent4: the fact that the geyser is not chondritic and tweezes Ariidae is incorrect. sent5: that the fishhook is not resistless but it is retractile is incorrect if the borate tweezes Ariidae. sent6: the fishhook is both not resistless and retractile if the geyser is not non-chondritic. sent7: if the borate does tweeze Ariidae the fact that the fishhook is resistless and is retractile is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the fishhook is resistless thing that is retractile does not hold if the geyser is chondritic. sent9: the borate is retractile if the fishhook tweezes Ariidae. sent10: the simian tweezes Ariidae. sent11: if the fishhook is retractile the fact that the borate does not tweeze Ariidae but it is resistless is false. sent12: that the geyser is resistless hold. sent13: the borate is chondritic. sent14: that the fishhook is resistless and it is retractile is not correct. sent15: the fact that the borate does not tweeze Ariidae but it is retractile is not right. sent16: that the borate is non-chondritic thing that does tweeze Ariidae is wrong. sent17: the hoarder does tweeze Ariidae.
$hypothesis$ = that the fishhook is a kind of resistible thing that is retractile is wrong if the geyser is not non-chondritic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fishhook is not resistless but retractile. sent2: the fishhook is not resistless but retractile if the borate does tweeze Ariidae. sent3: the fact that the borate does not tweeze Ariidae but it is chondritic does not hold if that the geyser is retractile is true. sent4: the fact that the geyser is not chondritic and tweezes Ariidae is incorrect. sent5: that the fishhook is not resistless but it is retractile is incorrect if the borate tweezes Ariidae. sent6: the fishhook is both not resistless and retractile if the geyser is not non-chondritic. sent7: if the borate does tweeze Ariidae the fact that the fishhook is resistless and is retractile is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the fishhook is resistless thing that is retractile does not hold if the geyser is chondritic. sent9: the borate is retractile if the fishhook tweezes Ariidae. sent10: the simian tweezes Ariidae. sent11: if the fishhook is retractile the fact that the borate does not tweeze Ariidae but it is resistless is false. sent12: that the geyser is resistless hold. sent13: the borate is chondritic. sent14: that the fishhook is resistless and it is retractile is not correct. sent15: the fact that the borate does not tweeze Ariidae but it is retractile is not right. sent16: that the borate is non-chondritic thing that does tweeze Ariidae is wrong. sent17: the hoarder does tweeze Ariidae. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__