the fact that there exists something such that if it is not scalene that it is not a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato does not hold is false.
sent1: that the existentialist is a Sarcosporidia and does not housekeep ostinato is wrong if that it is not scalene is true. sent2: there is something such that if it is not scalene the fact that it is a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato is not true. sent3: that the existentialist is not a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato is not true if it is scalene. sent4: there is something such that if it is non-scalene the fact that it is not a Sarcosporidia and housekeeps ostinato is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not scalene it is not a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a sequin then that it is not a kind of a episome and it is not a Wheatstone is not right. sent7: if the fact that the headrest is not a Balkans is correct the fact that it is not scalene but non-branchial does not hold. sent8: that the existentialist is not the Sarcosporidia and does not housekeep ostinato if the existentialist is not scalene is true. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a signature the fact that it does not approach candle and is not custard-like does not hold. sent10: the fact that the existentialist is not a Sarcosporidia but it housekeeps ostinato is false if it is not scalene. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a pyramid the fact that it does not approach ideation and does not housekeep Bellerophon is incorrect. sent12: that the saltpeter is not a B.O. and it is not summery is incorrect if it is non-scalene. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a sequin that it is both irreparable and not duodenal does not hold. sent14: that the existentialist is non-scalene thing that does not housekeep photocoagulation does not hold if it is not a lallation. sent15: there exists something such that if it is scalene the fact that it is not a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato is not correct. sent16: the fact that the existentialist is not a Sarcosporidia and does not housekeep ostinato is false if it is not scalene. sent17: the fact that something does not freeze-dry wood-frog and it does not regard quickness is wrong if it does not approach institute. sent18: the fact that the existentialist is a kind of non-scalene thing that does not approach Dinornithidae is not right if it is not a aphanite.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not approach institute that it does not freeze-dry wood-frog and it does not regard quickness is not right.
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the killdeer does not freeze-dry wood-frog and it does not regard quickness is not true if it does not approach institute.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not scalene that it is not a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato does not hold is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the existentialist is a Sarcosporidia and does not housekeep ostinato is wrong if that it is not scalene is true. sent2: there is something such that if it is not scalene the fact that it is a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato is not true. sent3: that the existentialist is not a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato is not true if it is scalene. sent4: there is something such that if it is non-scalene the fact that it is not a Sarcosporidia and housekeeps ostinato is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not scalene it is not a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a sequin then that it is not a kind of a episome and it is not a Wheatstone is not right. sent7: if the fact that the headrest is not a Balkans is correct the fact that it is not scalene but non-branchial does not hold. sent8: that the existentialist is not the Sarcosporidia and does not housekeep ostinato if the existentialist is not scalene is true. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a signature the fact that it does not approach candle and is not custard-like does not hold. sent10: the fact that the existentialist is not a Sarcosporidia but it housekeeps ostinato is false if it is not scalene. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a pyramid the fact that it does not approach ideation and does not housekeep Bellerophon is incorrect. sent12: that the saltpeter is not a B.O. and it is not summery is incorrect if it is non-scalene. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a sequin that it is both irreparable and not duodenal does not hold. sent14: that the existentialist is non-scalene thing that does not housekeep photocoagulation does not hold if it is not a lallation. sent15: there exists something such that if it is scalene the fact that it is not a Sarcosporidia and it does not housekeep ostinato is not correct. sent16: the fact that the existentialist is not a Sarcosporidia and does not housekeep ostinato is false if it is not scalene. sent17: the fact that something does not freeze-dry wood-frog and it does not regard quickness is wrong if it does not approach institute. sent18: the fact that the existentialist is a kind of non-scalene thing that does not approach Dinornithidae is not right if it is not a aphanite. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__