the Chad is not a redeployment and it is not a kind of a remainder.
sent1: the Chad is not a redeployment if that the belemnite is both a guesstimate and not Saharan is not true. sent2: the fact that the lovage does not ramp horology and tusks is false if it is a kind of a isometric. sent3: the belemnite is not a kind of a Saharan and is not a tusked. sent4: the fact that the belemnite guesstimates but it is non-Saharan is incorrect if the lovage is not a non-Saharan. sent5: if there exists something such that that it does impact and does not hatch rifle is false then the lovage is not a belly. sent6: if something that is a kind of a shower hatches rifle then it is not Saharan. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does clinch lovage and it does not sidle diarist does not hold then the Chad is not a remainder. sent8: the lovage is a kind of a guesstimate. sent9: that something is not a redeployment and does not remainder is false if it is a isometric. sent10: something does shower if it is not a isometric. sent11: that the lovage does not ramp horology is not wrong if there exists something such that it is streptococcal. sent12: The rifle hatches lovage. sent13: the lovage is streptococcal. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it clinches lovage and does not sidle diarist is not right. sent15: if something is a isometric then that it is a muzzler and it is not a pimp is not right. sent16: the belemnite sidles hindfoot. sent17: the lovage does not ramp horology but it is a tusked if it is streptococcal. sent18: if the fact that the Chad is streptococcal is correct it is not a kind of a redeployment and it is a tusked.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lovage is a isometric.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the lovage does not ramp horology but it does tusk is wrong.; sent17 & sent13 -> int2: the lovage does not ramp horology but it does tusk.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lovage is not a isometric.; sent10 -> int5: if the lovage is not isometric then it does shower.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lovage does shower.; sent6 -> int7: the lovage is not a kind of a Saharan if it is a kind of a shower that hatches rifle.; sent14 & sent7 -> int8: the Chad does not remainder.;
that the diarist is a kind of a muzzler and is not a pimp is not right.
sent15 -> int9: if the fact that the diarist is isometric hold then that it is a kind of a muzzler that is not a kind of a pimp does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the Chad is not a redeployment and it is not a kind of a remainder. ; $context$ = sent1: the Chad is not a redeployment if that the belemnite is both a guesstimate and not Saharan is not true. sent2: the fact that the lovage does not ramp horology and tusks is false if it is a kind of a isometric. sent3: the belemnite is not a kind of a Saharan and is not a tusked. sent4: the fact that the belemnite guesstimates but it is non-Saharan is incorrect if the lovage is not a non-Saharan. sent5: if there exists something such that that it does impact and does not hatch rifle is false then the lovage is not a belly. sent6: if something that is a kind of a shower hatches rifle then it is not Saharan. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does clinch lovage and it does not sidle diarist does not hold then the Chad is not a remainder. sent8: the lovage is a kind of a guesstimate. sent9: that something is not a redeployment and does not remainder is false if it is a isometric. sent10: something does shower if it is not a isometric. sent11: that the lovage does not ramp horology is not wrong if there exists something such that it is streptococcal. sent12: The rifle hatches lovage. sent13: the lovage is streptococcal. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it clinches lovage and does not sidle diarist is not right. sent15: if something is a isometric then that it is a muzzler and it is not a pimp is not right. sent16: the belemnite sidles hindfoot. sent17: the lovage does not ramp horology but it is a tusked if it is streptococcal. sent18: if the fact that the Chad is streptococcal is correct it is not a kind of a redeployment and it is a tusked. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lovage is a isometric.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the lovage does not ramp horology but it does tusk is wrong.; sent17 & sent13 -> int2: the lovage does not ramp horology but it does tusk.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lovage is not a isometric.; sent10 -> int5: if the lovage is not isometric then it does shower.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lovage does shower.; sent6 -> int7: the lovage is not a kind of a Saharan if it is a kind of a shower that hatches rifle.; sent14 & sent7 -> int8: the Chad does not remainder.; __UNKNOWN__