the tensileness occurs.
sent1: that the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur and/or that the irradiating contingent happens prevents that the tensileness occurs. sent2: that the neuralgicness happens is brought about by that the amperage occurs. sent3: if the fact that the revival does not occur is not incorrect then the vengeance does not occur. sent4: if the vengeance does not occur the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the non-neuralgicness and/or the amperage happens does not hold the tensileness happens. sent6: the neuralgicness does not occur. sent7: if the nonadsorbentness occurs the lexicalizing subdirectory happens. sent8: if the revival does not occur the fact that the neuralgicness does not occur and the amperage happens is false. sent9: that the vengeance does not occur is brought about by that the revival does not occur or that the amperage does not occur or both. sent10: the mind does not occur if the fact that both the non-neuralgicness and the amperage happens is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amperage occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the neuralgicness occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the amperage does not occur.; int3 -> int4: either the revival does not occur or the amperage does not occur or both.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the vengeance does not occur is true.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur and/or the irradiating contingent happens.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the minding does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the tensileness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur and/or that the irradiating contingent happens prevents that the tensileness occurs. sent2: that the neuralgicness happens is brought about by that the amperage occurs. sent3: if the fact that the revival does not occur is not incorrect then the vengeance does not occur. sent4: if the vengeance does not occur the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the non-neuralgicness and/or the amperage happens does not hold the tensileness happens. sent6: the neuralgicness does not occur. sent7: if the nonadsorbentness occurs the lexicalizing subdirectory happens. sent8: if the revival does not occur the fact that the neuralgicness does not occur and the amperage happens is false. sent9: that the vengeance does not occur is brought about by that the revival does not occur or that the amperage does not occur or both. sent10: the mind does not occur if the fact that both the non-neuralgicness and the amperage happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amperage occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the neuralgicness occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the amperage does not occur.; int3 -> int4: either the revival does not occur or the amperage does not occur or both.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the vengeance does not occur is true.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur and/or the irradiating contingent happens.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__