that the swelling occurs and the minstreling has-been occurs is false.
sent1: that the forehand and the inoculation occurs is not true. sent2: the expiring coextension does not occur and the investment happens. sent3: the cytoarchitecturalness does not occur. sent4: the intractableness does not occur. sent5: the ballisticness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the stickling bewilderment does not occur is right that both the activating and the epilation happens is not true. sent7: if the stickling bewilderment does not occur that not the activating but the epilation happens does not hold. sent8: the activating does not occur and the epilation occurs if the ballisticness does not occur. sent9: that the fact that not the corrections but the colloguing xenon occurs is not true is not incorrect. sent10: the swelling happens. sent11: that both the existentialistness and the minstreling quaestor occurs is true. sent12: that the domination happens is prevented by that either the hospitalization occurs or the colloguing umber occurs or both. sent13: the swell happens and the minstreling has-been happens if the fact that the viceregalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the activating does not occur. sent15: the non-viceregalness is caused by that the stickling bewilderment happens or that the minstreling lay-up occurs or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stickling bewilderment does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the activating does not occur and the epilation happens is wrong.; sent8 & sent5 -> int2: not the activating but the epilation happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stickling bewilderment occurs.; int4 -> int5: the stickling bewilderment and/or the minstreling lay-up occurs.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the viceregalness does not occur.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the swelling and the minstreling has-been happens is wrong.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the swelling occurs and the minstreling has-been occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the forehand and the inoculation occurs is not true. sent2: the expiring coextension does not occur and the investment happens. sent3: the cytoarchitecturalness does not occur. sent4: the intractableness does not occur. sent5: the ballisticness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the stickling bewilderment does not occur is right that both the activating and the epilation happens is not true. sent7: if the stickling bewilderment does not occur that not the activating but the epilation happens does not hold. sent8: the activating does not occur and the epilation occurs if the ballisticness does not occur. sent9: that the fact that not the corrections but the colloguing xenon occurs is not true is not incorrect. sent10: the swelling happens. sent11: that both the existentialistness and the minstreling quaestor occurs is true. sent12: that the domination happens is prevented by that either the hospitalization occurs or the colloguing umber occurs or both. sent13: the swell happens and the minstreling has-been happens if the fact that the viceregalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the activating does not occur. sent15: the non-viceregalness is caused by that the stickling bewilderment happens or that the minstreling lay-up occurs or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stickling bewilderment does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the activating does not occur and the epilation happens is wrong.; sent8 & sent5 -> int2: not the activating but the epilation happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stickling bewilderment occurs.; int4 -> int5: the stickling bewilderment and/or the minstreling lay-up occurs.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the viceregalness does not occur.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__