the rockslide occurs.
sent1: if the running snaffle does not occur then the clear-cutting happens. sent2: if the clear-cutting happens and the peekaboo occurs the rockslide does not occur. sent3: the typhoon does not occur if the peekaboo does not occur and the legatoness does not occur. sent4: the legatoness happens. sent5: if the placing does not occur then both the running snaffle and the parking occurs. sent6: the peekaboo happens and the legatoness happens. sent7: if the fact that the legatoness does not occur is not incorrect that both the rockslide and the peekaboo occurs is correct. sent8: that the running snaffle does not occur is correct.
sent6 -> int1: the peekaboo occurs.; sent1 & sent8 -> int2: the clear-cutting happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the clear-cutting and the peekaboo happens.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the typhoon does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the rockslide occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the running snaffle does not occur then the clear-cutting happens. sent2: if the clear-cutting happens and the peekaboo occurs the rockslide does not occur. sent3: the typhoon does not occur if the peekaboo does not occur and the legatoness does not occur. sent4: the legatoness happens. sent5: if the placing does not occur then both the running snaffle and the parking occurs. sent6: the peekaboo happens and the legatoness happens. sent7: if the fact that the legatoness does not occur is not incorrect that both the rockslide and the peekaboo occurs is correct. sent8: that the running snaffle does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the peekaboo occurs.; sent1 & sent8 -> int2: the clear-cutting happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the clear-cutting and the peekaboo happens.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__