the beachfront does not overawe IDF.
sent1: the beachfront does not overawe IDF if the fact that the aa tags snickersnee and instructs is not correct. sent2: the woodbine does not negate Ambrose if the fact that it does negate Ambrose and it is unidentifiable is incorrect. sent3: the woodbine is not a piccolo if something is unidentifiable or is not a kind of a piccolo or both. sent4: the feedback is costive thing that does tag snickersnee if the devices is not a Monk. sent5: the fact that the woodbine is a piccolo hold if there is something such that that it is not costive and/or it is not a kind of a Monk is not true. sent6: the woodbine does not instruct. sent7: the devices does not negate Ambrose if the woodbine does not negate Ambrose. sent8: if that the halo does not tag snickersnee and does not overawe IDF is incorrect then the beachfront does overawe IDF. sent9: that the fact that the aa does tag snickersnee and instructs is not wrong does not hold if the halo does not tag snickersnee. sent10: the feedback is costive if the halo tags snickersnee. sent11: something is abactinal or not a creel or both if it does tag snickersnee. sent12: that the devices is not costive or it is not a Monk or both is wrong if the feedback is costive. sent13: that the woodbine negates Ambrose and it is unidentifiable is false. sent14: that something does instruct but it is not a kind of a piccolo is not right if the fact that it does not negate Ambrose is true. sent15: the leviathan does negate Ambrose and it does tag Castile. sent16: that something is unidentifiable and/or it is not a kind of a piccolo is true if it negates Ambrose.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the halo tags snickersnee.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the feedback is costive.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that either the devices is not costive or it is not a kind of a Monk or both is not right.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not costive or it is not a Monk or both is incorrect.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the woodbine is a piccolo.; sent16 -> int5: the leviathan is unidentifiable and/or it is not a kind of a piccolo if it negates Ambrose.; sent15 -> int6: the leviathan does negate Ambrose.; int5 & int6 -> int7: either the leviathan is unidentifiable or it is not a piccolo or both.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that either it is not identifiable or it is not a kind of a piccolo or both.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the woodbine is not a piccolo is right.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the halo does not tag snickersnee.; int11 & sent9 -> int12: that the aa tags snickersnee and does instruct does not hold.; int12 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the disulfiram is abactinal and/or it is not a creel.
sent11 -> int13: if the disulfiram tags snickersnee then it is abactinal or it is not a creel or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the beachfront does not overawe IDF. ; $context$ = sent1: the beachfront does not overawe IDF if the fact that the aa tags snickersnee and instructs is not correct. sent2: the woodbine does not negate Ambrose if the fact that it does negate Ambrose and it is unidentifiable is incorrect. sent3: the woodbine is not a piccolo if something is unidentifiable or is not a kind of a piccolo or both. sent4: the feedback is costive thing that does tag snickersnee if the devices is not a Monk. sent5: the fact that the woodbine is a piccolo hold if there is something such that that it is not costive and/or it is not a kind of a Monk is not true. sent6: the woodbine does not instruct. sent7: the devices does not negate Ambrose if the woodbine does not negate Ambrose. sent8: if that the halo does not tag snickersnee and does not overawe IDF is incorrect then the beachfront does overawe IDF. sent9: that the fact that the aa does tag snickersnee and instructs is not wrong does not hold if the halo does not tag snickersnee. sent10: the feedback is costive if the halo tags snickersnee. sent11: something is abactinal or not a creel or both if it does tag snickersnee. sent12: that the devices is not costive or it is not a Monk or both is wrong if the feedback is costive. sent13: that the woodbine negates Ambrose and it is unidentifiable is false. sent14: that something does instruct but it is not a kind of a piccolo is not right if the fact that it does not negate Ambrose is true. sent15: the leviathan does negate Ambrose and it does tag Castile. sent16: that something is unidentifiable and/or it is not a kind of a piccolo is true if it negates Ambrose. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the halo tags snickersnee.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the feedback is costive.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that either the devices is not costive or it is not a kind of a Monk or both is not right.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not costive or it is not a Monk or both is incorrect.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the woodbine is a piccolo.; sent16 -> int5: the leviathan is unidentifiable and/or it is not a kind of a piccolo if it negates Ambrose.; sent15 -> int6: the leviathan does negate Ambrose.; int5 & int6 -> int7: either the leviathan is unidentifiable or it is not a piccolo or both.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that either it is not identifiable or it is not a kind of a piccolo or both.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the woodbine is not a piccolo is right.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the halo does not tag snickersnee.; int11 & sent9 -> int12: that the aa tags snickersnee and does instruct does not hold.; int12 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__