the eviction does not occur.
sent1: if the extensileness does not occur then the fact that the bentoniticness happens is correct. sent2: the tripping vesper occurs and the diagonalizableness happens. sent3: the dissonating does not occur. sent4: the nonextensileness yields that the know and the bentoniticness happens. sent5: the non-feverishness triggers that the eviction does not occur. sent6: the gastronomy occurs. sent7: the miscarrying transitive happens. sent8: the holisticness occurs. sent9: if the spawn does not occur the precociousness occurs and the decrepitation occurs. sent10: the fact that the allomorphicness does not occur hold. sent11: the Frenchifying triggerfish and the ordinance happens if the gastronomy does not occur. sent12: the ordinance happens and the gastronomy occurs. sent13: if the ordinance happens the oppositeness occurs. sent14: if the oppositeness and the feverishness occurs then the knowing does not occur. sent15: that the bentoniticness occurs hold.
sent12 -> int1: the ordinance happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the oppositeness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the feverishness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the oppositeness and the feverishness happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the knowing does not occur.;
that the Frenchifying triggerfish and the tripping Rama occurs is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the eviction does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the extensileness does not occur then the fact that the bentoniticness happens is correct. sent2: the tripping vesper occurs and the diagonalizableness happens. sent3: the dissonating does not occur. sent4: the nonextensileness yields that the know and the bentoniticness happens. sent5: the non-feverishness triggers that the eviction does not occur. sent6: the gastronomy occurs. sent7: the miscarrying transitive happens. sent8: the holisticness occurs. sent9: if the spawn does not occur the precociousness occurs and the decrepitation occurs. sent10: the fact that the allomorphicness does not occur hold. sent11: the Frenchifying triggerfish and the ordinance happens if the gastronomy does not occur. sent12: the ordinance happens and the gastronomy occurs. sent13: if the ordinance happens the oppositeness occurs. sent14: if the oppositeness and the feverishness occurs then the knowing does not occur. sent15: that the bentoniticness occurs hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the ordinance happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the oppositeness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the feverishness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the oppositeness and the feverishness happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the knowing does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__