there is something such that if it chomps shelled then that it does not repent timework or it is not a kind of a flatness or both is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if it is biotypic then the fact that either it is not entomological or it is not a tentmaker or both is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if it does chomp shelled then it does not repent timework or is not flatness or both. sent3: that something does not repent timework and/or it is not unproductive is not correct if it is extrasystolic. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Lincoln then that it does not nag trainer and/or it is not a centner is not correct. sent5: that the dad does not repent timework and/or it is not a flatness does not hold if it does chomp shelled.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cotton does not repent timework or it is not unproductive or both does not hold if it is extrasystolic.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it chomps shelled then that it does not repent timework or it is not a kind of a flatness or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is biotypic then the fact that either it is not entomological or it is not a tentmaker or both is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if it does chomp shelled then it does not repent timework or is not flatness or both. sent3: that something does not repent timework and/or it is not unproductive is not correct if it is extrasystolic. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Lincoln then that it does not nag trainer and/or it is not a centner is not correct. sent5: that the dad does not repent timework and/or it is not a flatness does not hold if it does chomp shelled. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__