the frittering happens.
sent1: that the allopatricness does not occur hold. sent2: the forgiveness occurs. sent3: the Ephesiansness does not occur if the flinging and/or the clinking disbarment occurs. sent4: the non-synergisticness prevents that the frittering does not occur. sent5: the synergisticness is prevented by that the sneering Chlorophthalmidae but not the flinging happens. sent6: the cataclinalness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the sneering Chlorophthalmidae occurs is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fling happens.; assump1 -> int1: the fling or the clinking disbarment or both happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Ephesiansness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the frittering happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the allopatricness does not occur hold. sent2: the forgiveness occurs. sent3: the Ephesiansness does not occur if the flinging and/or the clinking disbarment occurs. sent4: the non-synergisticness prevents that the frittering does not occur. sent5: the synergisticness is prevented by that the sneering Chlorophthalmidae but not the flinging happens. sent6: the cataclinalness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the sneering Chlorophthalmidae occurs is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fling happens.; assump1 -> int1: the fling or the clinking disbarment or both happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Ephesiansness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__