the march leads to the lymphangiography.
sent1: the pole occurs. sent2: the petting occurs. sent3: the necessariness does not occur. sent4: the fandango occurs if the alliterating occurs. sent5: the lymphangiography occurs if the marching occurs and the necessariness does not occur. sent6: the jellifying rudderpost but not the passerineness occurs. sent7: the fact that the glide does not occur hold. sent8: the alliterating but not the exceeding millionaire occurs. sent9: the draping blowgun occurs. sent10: the cyprianness happens. sent11: the awainess occurs but the preempting evil does not occur. sent12: if the preempting penknife happens but the spectacle does not occur the euphoniousness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the marching happens.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the marching but not the necessariness occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the lymphangiography occurs is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the march leads to the lymphangiography. ; $context$ = sent1: the pole occurs. sent2: the petting occurs. sent3: the necessariness does not occur. sent4: the fandango occurs if the alliterating occurs. sent5: the lymphangiography occurs if the marching occurs and the necessariness does not occur. sent6: the jellifying rudderpost but not the passerineness occurs. sent7: the fact that the glide does not occur hold. sent8: the alliterating but not the exceeding millionaire occurs. sent9: the draping blowgun occurs. sent10: the cyprianness happens. sent11: the awainess occurs but the preempting evil does not occur. sent12: if the preempting penknife happens but the spectacle does not occur the euphoniousness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the marching happens.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the marching but not the necessariness occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the lymphangiography occurs is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__