the chef is fissile.
sent1: the carpet is a drugget that does not devastate. sent2: if that something is not a boodle and does not sideline latte is not correct then it is a ferricyanide. sent3: the villa is a doge and it is a fairy if there is something such that it is not a kind of a inanity. sent4: the chef is fissile if something is a kind of a drugget but it is not a kind of a lysozyme. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a heckelphone and it does not confine acromion is not true the fact that the Elinvar is weedless is not wrong. sent6: something is not fissile if the fact that it is smokeless and it does not ridicule stifler is not true. sent7: that everything is both a ferricyanide and weedless is not wrong. sent8: if the granter is a Huntsville then it ridicules stifler. sent9: if the philistine is tonal that the Elinvar is not a boodle and it does not sideline latte is not right. sent10: the Elinvar is a kind of a snailfish. sent11: if the fact that the angel does not err hold the fact that the croupier is a heckelphone but it does not confine acromion does not hold. sent12: the Elinvar is a drugget but it is not a lysozyme if the microsporidian is a lysozyme. sent13: the chef is a lysozyme if that the microsporidian is not a drugget is correct. sent14: something does not ridicule stifler if it is a ferricyanide. sent15: if something is philosophic it is tonal. sent16: something that is a kind of a doge is both a curliness and not chimeric. sent17: the angel does not err if there exists something such that the fact that it is not estrogenic and it does contemn Arisaema is not correct. sent18: something is fissile if the fact that it is not a Huntsville but weedless does not hold. sent19: the microsporidian is a kind of a lysozyme if the granter is smokeless. sent20: something is a kind of a Protropin. sent21: the fact that the granter is smokeless and it is fissile is incorrect. sent22: if the granter is not smokeless then that it is a Huntsville and it is a clothesbrush does not hold. sent23: the fact that something is not a Huntsville but it is a clothesbrush is not true if the fact that it is not smokeless is not incorrect. sent24: if the villa is a curliness that the coccidium is non-estrogenic thing that does contemn Arisaema is false. sent25: the abstractionist is not a kind of a inanity. sent26: the philistine is philosophic.
sent23 -> int1: if the granter is not smokeless then that it is not a Huntsville and it is a clothesbrush is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the granter is non-smokeless.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the granter is not a kind of a Huntsville and is a kind of a clothesbrush is incorrect.; sent14 -> int3: if the granter is a ferricyanide then it does not ridicule stifler.; sent7 -> int4: the granter is a ferricyanide and weedless.; int4 -> int5: the granter is a ferricyanide.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the granter does not ridicule stifler.;
the chef is not fissile.
sent6 -> int7: if the fact that the chef is smokeless thing that does not ridicule stifler does not hold then it is not fissile.; sent16 -> int8: if the villa is a doge then it is a kind of a curliness and is not chimeric.; sent25 -> int9: something is not a inanity.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the villa is a doge that is a fairy.; int10 -> int11: the villa is a doge.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the villa is a kind of a curliness and is not chimeric.; int12 -> int13: the villa is a curliness.; sent24 & int13 -> int14: that the coccidium is not estrogenic but it contemns Arisaema does not hold.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it is not estrogenic and contemns Arisaema is wrong.; int15 & sent17 -> int16: the angel does not err.; sent11 & int16 -> int17: that the croupier is a heckelphone and does not confine acromion does not hold.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that that it is a kind of a heckelphone and it does not confine acromion is wrong.; int18 & sent5 -> int19: that the Elinvar is weedless is true.; sent2 -> int20: the Elinvar is a ferricyanide if that it is not a boodle and it does not sideline latte is not true.; sent15 -> int21: the philistine is tonal if it is philosophic.; int21 & sent26 -> int22: the philistine is tonal.; sent9 & int22 -> int23: that the Elinvar is not a boodle and it does not sideline latte does not hold.; int20 & int23 -> int24: the Elinvar is a kind of a ferricyanide.; int19 & int24 -> int25: the Elinvar is weedless and it is a ferricyanide.; int25 -> int26: there exists something such that it is a kind of weedless thing that is a ferricyanide.;
$hypothesis$ = the chef is fissile. ; $context$ = sent1: the carpet is a drugget that does not devastate. sent2: if that something is not a boodle and does not sideline latte is not correct then it is a ferricyanide. sent3: the villa is a doge and it is a fairy if there is something such that it is not a kind of a inanity. sent4: the chef is fissile if something is a kind of a drugget but it is not a kind of a lysozyme. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a heckelphone and it does not confine acromion is not true the fact that the Elinvar is weedless is not wrong. sent6: something is not fissile if the fact that it is smokeless and it does not ridicule stifler is not true. sent7: that everything is both a ferricyanide and weedless is not wrong. sent8: if the granter is a Huntsville then it ridicules stifler. sent9: if the philistine is tonal that the Elinvar is not a boodle and it does not sideline latte is not right. sent10: the Elinvar is a kind of a snailfish. sent11: if the fact that the angel does not err hold the fact that the croupier is a heckelphone but it does not confine acromion does not hold. sent12: the Elinvar is a drugget but it is not a lysozyme if the microsporidian is a lysozyme. sent13: the chef is a lysozyme if that the microsporidian is not a drugget is correct. sent14: something does not ridicule stifler if it is a ferricyanide. sent15: if something is philosophic it is tonal. sent16: something that is a kind of a doge is both a curliness and not chimeric. sent17: the angel does not err if there exists something such that the fact that it is not estrogenic and it does contemn Arisaema is not correct. sent18: something is fissile if the fact that it is not a Huntsville but weedless does not hold. sent19: the microsporidian is a kind of a lysozyme if the granter is smokeless. sent20: something is a kind of a Protropin. sent21: the fact that the granter is smokeless and it is fissile is incorrect. sent22: if the granter is not smokeless then that it is a Huntsville and it is a clothesbrush does not hold. sent23: the fact that something is not a Huntsville but it is a clothesbrush is not true if the fact that it is not smokeless is not incorrect. sent24: if the villa is a curliness that the coccidium is non-estrogenic thing that does contemn Arisaema is false. sent25: the abstractionist is not a kind of a inanity. sent26: the philistine is philosophic. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 -> int1: if the granter is not smokeless then that it is not a Huntsville and it is a clothesbrush is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the granter is non-smokeless.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the granter is not a kind of a Huntsville and is a kind of a clothesbrush is incorrect.; sent14 -> int3: if the granter is a ferricyanide then it does not ridicule stifler.; sent7 -> int4: the granter is a ferricyanide and weedless.; int4 -> int5: the granter is a ferricyanide.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the granter does not ridicule stifler.; __UNKNOWN__