the leaning preemption occurs.
sent1: the leaning FSH happens and the leaning funicular happens. sent2: if the indication occurs then the microbialness does not occur but the leaning partner occurs. sent3: that both the superscript and the climbing occurs is brought about by that the microbialness does not occur. sent4: the climb happens and the microbialness occurs if the leaning partner does not occur. sent5: if the cruciferousness and/or the cruise happens the superscriptness does not occur. sent6: if the leaning FSH happens the indication does not occur and the leaning partner does not occur. sent7: if that the superscriptness does not occur is true then the climbing does not occur. sent8: if the leaning preemption happens then the fact that the spectating happens is correct. sent9: if the spectating occurs the cruciferousness occurs. sent10: that the cruciferousness happens is prevented by that the cruise happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leaning preemption happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the spectating happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the cruciferousness happens.; int2 -> int3: either the cruciferousness or the cruising or both occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the superscript does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the climb does not occur.; sent1 -> int6: the leaning FSH occurs.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the indication does not occur and the leaning partner does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the leaning partner does not occur.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the climb and the microbialness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the climb happens.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the leaning preemption happens.
$hypothesis$ = the leaning preemption occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the leaning FSH happens and the leaning funicular happens. sent2: if the indication occurs then the microbialness does not occur but the leaning partner occurs. sent3: that both the superscript and the climbing occurs is brought about by that the microbialness does not occur. sent4: the climb happens and the microbialness occurs if the leaning partner does not occur. sent5: if the cruciferousness and/or the cruise happens the superscriptness does not occur. sent6: if the leaning FSH happens the indication does not occur and the leaning partner does not occur. sent7: if that the superscriptness does not occur is true then the climbing does not occur. sent8: if the leaning preemption happens then the fact that the spectating happens is correct. sent9: if the spectating occurs the cruciferousness occurs. sent10: that the cruciferousness happens is prevented by that the cruise happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leaning preemption happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the spectating happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the cruciferousness happens.; int2 -> int3: either the cruciferousness or the cruising or both occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the superscript does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the climb does not occur.; sent1 -> int6: the leaning FSH occurs.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the indication does not occur and the leaning partner does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the leaning partner does not occur.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the climb and the microbialness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the climb happens.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__