the cutout is not mammalian.
sent1: if something syllogizes and it rewrites lapboard then it does not bulldog. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it does bulldog and it does not drape Ficus is incorrect then the leatherleaf does drape Ficus. sent3: that the drosophila does not destroy hold. sent4: if the Dunkers does not syllogize the cutout does sophisticate chivalry and it is mammalian. sent5: the Dunkers is a kind of a Turkish and does destroy if the drosophila does not rewrite bacon. sent6: that something does not rewrite lapboard and/or it is a bulldog is not true if it is a Turkish. sent7: that if the fact that the airhead is the kind of proprietary thing that does not drape Texarkana is incorrect then the fact that the airhead is not proprietary is correct is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that it rewrites bacon. sent9: the airhead does rewrite gorilla. sent10: the leatherleaf does sophisticate chivalry and does syllogize if the Dunkers does not rewrite lapboard. sent11: the hermit is not mammalian. sent12: the drosophila does rewrite lapboard if there exists something such that the fact that it does not rewrite bacon and/or it is proprietary is not true. sent13: the Dunkers does rewrite bacon or it is mammalian or both if the airhead is not proprietary. sent14: there exists something such that that it does not rewrite bacon and/or it is proprietary does not hold. sent15: the fact that the airhead is proprietary thing that does not drape Texarkana does not hold if it rewrites gorilla. sent16: the fact that something does not cicatrize and does rewrite bacon is wrong if it is not proprietary. sent17: if the drosophila is not a bulldog then that the airhead is not a Turkish and it does not destroy is correct. sent18: The chivalry sophisticates Dunkers. sent19: if something is not a Turkish the fact that it bulldogs and it does not drape Ficus is not correct. sent20: if that something does not destroy is right then it is not a Turkish. sent21: if the airhead is not Turkish and it does not destroy the cutout is not mammalian. sent22: if the Dunkers sophisticates chivalry then the drosophila does syllogize.
sent14 & sent12 -> int1: the drosophila rewrites lapboard.; sent1 -> int2: that the drosophila is not a kind of the bulldog if the drosophila does syllogize and rewrites lapboard is correct.;
the leatherleaf drapes Ficus and it does syllogize.
sent19 -> int3: if the drosophila is not a kind of a Turkish the fact that it does bulldog and it does not drape Ficus does not hold.; sent20 -> int4: the drosophila is not a kind of a Turkish if it does not destroy.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the drosophila is not a kind of a Turkish.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the drosophila bulldogs but it does not drape Ficus is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is a bulldog and does not drape Ficus is false.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the leatherleaf does drape Ficus.;
$hypothesis$ = the cutout is not mammalian. ; $context$ = sent1: if something syllogizes and it rewrites lapboard then it does not bulldog. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it does bulldog and it does not drape Ficus is incorrect then the leatherleaf does drape Ficus. sent3: that the drosophila does not destroy hold. sent4: if the Dunkers does not syllogize the cutout does sophisticate chivalry and it is mammalian. sent5: the Dunkers is a kind of a Turkish and does destroy if the drosophila does not rewrite bacon. sent6: that something does not rewrite lapboard and/or it is a bulldog is not true if it is a Turkish. sent7: that if the fact that the airhead is the kind of proprietary thing that does not drape Texarkana is incorrect then the fact that the airhead is not proprietary is correct is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that it rewrites bacon. sent9: the airhead does rewrite gorilla. sent10: the leatherleaf does sophisticate chivalry and does syllogize if the Dunkers does not rewrite lapboard. sent11: the hermit is not mammalian. sent12: the drosophila does rewrite lapboard if there exists something such that the fact that it does not rewrite bacon and/or it is proprietary is not true. sent13: the Dunkers does rewrite bacon or it is mammalian or both if the airhead is not proprietary. sent14: there exists something such that that it does not rewrite bacon and/or it is proprietary does not hold. sent15: the fact that the airhead is proprietary thing that does not drape Texarkana does not hold if it rewrites gorilla. sent16: the fact that something does not cicatrize and does rewrite bacon is wrong if it is not proprietary. sent17: if the drosophila is not a bulldog then that the airhead is not a Turkish and it does not destroy is correct. sent18: The chivalry sophisticates Dunkers. sent19: if something is not a Turkish the fact that it bulldogs and it does not drape Ficus is not correct. sent20: if that something does not destroy is right then it is not a Turkish. sent21: if the airhead is not Turkish and it does not destroy the cutout is not mammalian. sent22: if the Dunkers sophisticates chivalry then the drosophila does syllogize. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent12 -> int1: the drosophila rewrites lapboard.; sent1 -> int2: that the drosophila is not a kind of the bulldog if the drosophila does syllogize and rewrites lapboard is correct.; __UNKNOWN__