the fact that there is something such that if it is not an eggnog that it is not anhydrous and does not splat hectoliter does not hold is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the cabstand is a kind of non-anhydrous thing that does not splat hectoliter is false if it is not an eggnog. sent2: that the cabstand is not a kind of an eggnog and it is not an outboard does not hold if it is a colored. sent3: if something is not a Hevesy that it does not finish antiknock and it is not a hyperextension is not correct. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of an eggnog then that it is non-anhydrous thing that does not splat hectoliter does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is not paroxysmal then the fact that it does finish alkene and it does not splat FTO is wrong. sent6: that the cabstand lashes and does not finish bugged is not correct if it does not scotch. sent7: the fact that something is not an enlistment and it does not conform does not hold if it does not finish maguey. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is not an eggnog is right the fact that it is non-anhydrous thing that splats hectoliter is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a besom the fact that it is a brunet and it does not splat trepan is wrong. sent10: if that the cabstand is not an eggnog is not wrong the fact that it is both not a community and a illiberality is false. sent11: that the concentrate is not a kind of an eggnog and does outflank structuralism is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of a arteriole is correct. sent12: if the cabstand is not an eggnog the fact that it is a kind of anhydrous thing that does not splat hectoliter is wrong. sent13: that the cabstand is not anhydrous and not a care does not hold if it is reflective. sent14: there is something such that if it is not non-revenant then that it does not trumpet and it is not categorical is false. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not exocentric is correct then that it is not a care and does not outflank VLF is not right.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a Hevesy that it does not finish antiknock and it is not a hyperextension is not true.
sent3 -> int1: if the fact that the monomer is not a kind of a Hevesy is not incorrect then that it does not finish antiknock and it is not a kind of a hyperextension is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not an eggnog that it is not anhydrous and does not splat hectoliter does not hold is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cabstand is a kind of non-anhydrous thing that does not splat hectoliter is false if it is not an eggnog. sent2: that the cabstand is not a kind of an eggnog and it is not an outboard does not hold if it is a colored. sent3: if something is not a Hevesy that it does not finish antiknock and it is not a hyperextension is not correct. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of an eggnog then that it is non-anhydrous thing that does not splat hectoliter does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is not paroxysmal then the fact that it does finish alkene and it does not splat FTO is wrong. sent6: that the cabstand lashes and does not finish bugged is not correct if it does not scotch. sent7: the fact that something is not an enlistment and it does not conform does not hold if it does not finish maguey. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is not an eggnog is right the fact that it is non-anhydrous thing that splats hectoliter is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a besom the fact that it is a brunet and it does not splat trepan is wrong. sent10: if that the cabstand is not an eggnog is not wrong the fact that it is both not a community and a illiberality is false. sent11: that the concentrate is not a kind of an eggnog and does outflank structuralism is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of a arteriole is correct. sent12: if the cabstand is not an eggnog the fact that it is a kind of anhydrous thing that does not splat hectoliter is wrong. sent13: that the cabstand is not anhydrous and not a care does not hold if it is reflective. sent14: there is something such that if it is not non-revenant then that it does not trumpet and it is not categorical is false. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not exocentric is correct then that it is not a care and does not outflank VLF is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__