the lactobacillus does exsiccate outing and is pyrochemical.
sent1: the Nepalese is a kind of a Taurus. sent2: that the telencephalon is a theca and it is peritoneal is not right. sent3: if something is Levantine it is not protrusive. sent4: the playgoer does not exsiccate outing if it is not protrusive and/or is not a Taurus. sent5: the telencephalon is not a Taurus if the fact that the foxglove is a kind of a Levantine and it is pyrochemical is not right. sent6: if something is protrusive that the Nepalese is thermodynamics and it exsiccates outing is wrong. sent7: the foxglove is a kind of a Tuscan that does exsiccate Springfield. sent8: if the playgoer is not actinomycotic the Nepalese is protrusive. sent9: the lactobacillus does exsiccate outing if the foxglove is not pyrochemical. sent10: if the fact that the telencephalon is a Taurus and it is a Levantine is not correct then the foxglove is non-pyrochemical. sent11: the fact that the phyllode is a Taurus is not false. sent12: if that the fact that the playgoer is not protrusive and/or is not Levantine is wrong is true then the isoleucine is impalpable. sent13: if the foxglove is not pyrochemical the lactobacillus exsiccates outing and is pyrochemical. sent14: that the telencephalon is a Taurus and it is a kind of a Levantine is false if there is something such that it is protrusive. sent15: there exists something such that it is thermodynamics. sent16: the lactobacillus exsiccates outing. sent17: the fact that the telencephalon is both pyrochemical and non-Levantine does not hold. sent18: the playgoer is not protrusive and/or it is not a kind of a Taurus if there is something such that it is not protrusive. sent19: if something is not pyrochemical it does rap deductible and is a Taurus. sent20: the fact that the playgoer is actinomycotic but it is not thermodynamics is not true. sent21: the Nepalese is protrusive if that that the playgoer is actinomycotic thing that is not thermodynamics is right does not hold. sent22: the foxglove is not pyrochemical if the telencephalon is not a Taurus.
sent21 & sent20 -> int1: the Nepalese is protrusive.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is protrusive is true.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the telencephalon is a Taurus and it is a Levantine is wrong.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the foxglove is not pyrochemical.; sent13 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the isoleucine is impalpable and it raps deductible.
sent19 -> int5: if the isoleucine is not pyrochemical it does rap deductible and is a Taurus.;
$hypothesis$ = the lactobacillus does exsiccate outing and is pyrochemical. ; $context$ = sent1: the Nepalese is a kind of a Taurus. sent2: that the telencephalon is a theca and it is peritoneal is not right. sent3: if something is Levantine it is not protrusive. sent4: the playgoer does not exsiccate outing if it is not protrusive and/or is not a Taurus. sent5: the telencephalon is not a Taurus if the fact that the foxglove is a kind of a Levantine and it is pyrochemical is not right. sent6: if something is protrusive that the Nepalese is thermodynamics and it exsiccates outing is wrong. sent7: the foxglove is a kind of a Tuscan that does exsiccate Springfield. sent8: if the playgoer is not actinomycotic the Nepalese is protrusive. sent9: the lactobacillus does exsiccate outing if the foxglove is not pyrochemical. sent10: if the fact that the telencephalon is a Taurus and it is a Levantine is not correct then the foxglove is non-pyrochemical. sent11: the fact that the phyllode is a Taurus is not false. sent12: if that the fact that the playgoer is not protrusive and/or is not Levantine is wrong is true then the isoleucine is impalpable. sent13: if the foxglove is not pyrochemical the lactobacillus exsiccates outing and is pyrochemical. sent14: that the telencephalon is a Taurus and it is a kind of a Levantine is false if there is something such that it is protrusive. sent15: there exists something such that it is thermodynamics. sent16: the lactobacillus exsiccates outing. sent17: the fact that the telencephalon is both pyrochemical and non-Levantine does not hold. sent18: the playgoer is not protrusive and/or it is not a kind of a Taurus if there is something such that it is not protrusive. sent19: if something is not pyrochemical it does rap deductible and is a Taurus. sent20: the fact that the playgoer is actinomycotic but it is not thermodynamics is not true. sent21: the Nepalese is protrusive if that that the playgoer is actinomycotic thing that is not thermodynamics is right does not hold. sent22: the foxglove is not pyrochemical if the telencephalon is not a Taurus. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent20 -> int1: the Nepalese is protrusive.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is protrusive is true.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the telencephalon is a Taurus and it is a Levantine is wrong.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the foxglove is not pyrochemical.; sent13 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__