that the miniver is not gladiatorial and is a stearin is not true.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the pickup is not dental and it does not emigrate is true does not hold. sent2: if the diplomat is not gladiatorial then that the miniver is non-gladiatorial thing that is a kind of a stearin is not correct. sent3: if something is a kind of a break and it is a Alamo it is not cold. sent4: there is something such that it is a Alamo and breaks. sent5: the fact that something is not a cold and is not onside is not true if it is a Bhutanese. sent6: the fact that the miniver is gladiatorial and is a stearin is wrong. sent7: the pickup is non-onside if there is something such that it is a kind of a Alamo and it does break. sent8: if the pickup emigrates then it is a Bhutanese. sent9: if the diplomat is not gladiatorial that the fact that the miniver is gladiatorial and it is a stearin does not hold hold. sent10: there is something such that it is a kind of a Alamo. sent11: the fact that the pickup is not dental but it does emigrate is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that it does break. sent13: the diplomat is not gladiatorial if there exists something such that it is cerebrovascular and/or is a kind of a cold. sent14: there exists something such that it does reheat picosecond and is a cardinal. sent15: if there are cerebrovascular things the diplomat is not gladiatorial.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the pickup is not onside.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pickup is not a kind of a cold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pickup is not cold and it is not onside.; sent5 -> int3: if the pickup is a Bhutanese the fact that it is not a kind of a cold and it is not onside is wrong.;
the Parisienne is not a cold.
sent3 -> int4: the Parisienne is not cold if it is a kind of a break and is a Alamo.;
$hypothesis$ = that the miniver is not gladiatorial and is a stearin is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the pickup is not dental and it does not emigrate is true does not hold. sent2: if the diplomat is not gladiatorial then that the miniver is non-gladiatorial thing that is a kind of a stearin is not correct. sent3: if something is a kind of a break and it is a Alamo it is not cold. sent4: there is something such that it is a Alamo and breaks. sent5: the fact that something is not a cold and is not onside is not true if it is a Bhutanese. sent6: the fact that the miniver is gladiatorial and is a stearin is wrong. sent7: the pickup is non-onside if there is something such that it is a kind of a Alamo and it does break. sent8: if the pickup emigrates then it is a Bhutanese. sent9: if the diplomat is not gladiatorial that the fact that the miniver is gladiatorial and it is a stearin does not hold hold. sent10: there is something such that it is a kind of a Alamo. sent11: the fact that the pickup is not dental but it does emigrate is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that it does break. sent13: the diplomat is not gladiatorial if there exists something such that it is cerebrovascular and/or is a kind of a cold. sent14: there exists something such that it does reheat picosecond and is a cardinal. sent15: if there are cerebrovascular things the diplomat is not gladiatorial. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the pickup is not onside.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pickup is not a kind of a cold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pickup is not cold and it is not onside.; sent5 -> int3: if the pickup is a Bhutanese the fact that it is not a kind of a cold and it is not onside is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__