the fact that that there is something such that if the fact that it is not toxic is right then the fact that it is not precise and it is not cytophotometric is not true is not wrong is not right.
sent1: if the fact that the clinid is not precise hold then the fact that it is a luging and it does not strike treachery is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not concretize hexahedron the fact that it maddens hypo and is not a kind of a maharani is false. sent3: if the dulse is not toxic it is a kind of imprecise thing that is non-cytophotometric. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not glamorize Psophia then the fact that it does not advise and is not a Bruch is not correct. sent5: if something is not toxic then that the fact that it is both not precise and not cytophotometric is correct is not true. sent6: if the dulse is not toxic then the fact that it is precise and is not cytophotometric does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is toxic the fact that it is imprecise thing that is not cytophotometric is incorrect. sent8: something does not strike treachery and it is not disintegrative if it is not a kind of a Austrian. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a transferee it is not contemptible and is not lung-like.
sent5 -> int1: that if the dulse is not toxic then that the dulse is not precise and it is not cytophotometric is incorrect hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that there is something such that if the fact that it is not toxic is right then the fact that it is not precise and it is not cytophotometric is not true is not wrong is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the clinid is not precise hold then the fact that it is a luging and it does not strike treachery is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not concretize hexahedron the fact that it maddens hypo and is not a kind of a maharani is false. sent3: if the dulse is not toxic it is a kind of imprecise thing that is non-cytophotometric. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not glamorize Psophia then the fact that it does not advise and is not a Bruch is not correct. sent5: if something is not toxic then that the fact that it is both not precise and not cytophotometric is correct is not true. sent6: if the dulse is not toxic then the fact that it is precise and is not cytophotometric does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is toxic the fact that it is imprecise thing that is not cytophotometric is incorrect. sent8: something does not strike treachery and it is not disintegrative if it is not a kind of a Austrian. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a transferee it is not contemptible and is not lung-like. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that if the dulse is not toxic then that the dulse is not precise and it is not cytophotometric is incorrect hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__