the advection is a kind of a syphilitic and it is a inexpensiveness.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is not a executability then the radicchio does not draw. sent2: the ignition is a Balsaminaceae if the linendraper does master chebab. sent3: the barbell is not a feint. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a Balsaminaceae and/or is not uncontroversial the ignition is not a Adige. sent5: if the ignition is a Balsaminaceae or is uncontroversial or both the trustee does not master major-general. sent6: the tangle does not master major-general and is a tilt if the barbell is catarrhine. sent7: the advection is syphilitic if that it tilts and is not a kind of a catarrhine does not hold. sent8: the advection does brad Cyclophorus. sent9: if the linendraper is a Adige the ignition is a Balsaminaceae. sent10: the linendraper is not a inexpensiveness if something that does not master chebab is not evidentiary. sent11: if the trustee does not master major-general then it is a tilt. sent12: if the advection does contain then it is a kind of a Muslim. sent13: the barbell is a catarrhine if it does brad Cyclophorus. sent14: if the tangle does not master major-general and is a tilt then the trustee is not uncontroversial. sent15: The Cyclophorus does brad advection. sent16: if the barbell is a stephanion it is not non-catarrhine. sent17: the fact that if the advection brads Cyclophorus then the advection is a inexpensiveness is right. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Muslim and does demote magnetosphere does not hold. sent19: if the linendraper is not evidentiary either it masters chebab or it is a Adige or both. sent20: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Muslim and does demote magnetosphere is not right then the linendraper is not evidentiary. sent21: the barbell either is a kind of a stephanion or brads Cyclophorus or both if it is not a feint.
sent18 & sent20 -> int1: the linendraper is not evidentiary.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the linendraper masters chebab and/or it is a kind of a Adige.; int2 & sent2 & sent9 -> int3: the ignition is a Balsaminaceae.; int3 -> int4: the ignition is a Balsaminaceae and/or uncontroversial.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the trustee does not master major-general.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the trustee is a kind of a tilt.; sent17 & sent8 -> int7: the advection is a kind of a inexpensiveness.;
the fact that the advection is a syphilitic and it is a inexpensiveness does not hold.
sent21 & sent3 -> int8: the barbell is a stephanion or it does brad Cyclophorus or both.; int8 & sent16 & sent13 -> int9: the barbell is a kind of a catarrhine.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the tangle does not master major-general and does tilt.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: the trustee is controversial.; int11 -> int12: the trustee is not a kind of a Balsaminaceae and/or it is not uncontroversial.; int12 -> int13: something is not a kind of a Balsaminaceae or it is not uncontroversial or both.; int13 & sent4 -> int14: that the ignition is not a Adige hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the advection is a kind of a syphilitic and it is a inexpensiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is not a executability then the radicchio does not draw. sent2: the ignition is a Balsaminaceae if the linendraper does master chebab. sent3: the barbell is not a feint. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a Balsaminaceae and/or is not uncontroversial the ignition is not a Adige. sent5: if the ignition is a Balsaminaceae or is uncontroversial or both the trustee does not master major-general. sent6: the tangle does not master major-general and is a tilt if the barbell is catarrhine. sent7: the advection is syphilitic if that it tilts and is not a kind of a catarrhine does not hold. sent8: the advection does brad Cyclophorus. sent9: if the linendraper is a Adige the ignition is a Balsaminaceae. sent10: the linendraper is not a inexpensiveness if something that does not master chebab is not evidentiary. sent11: if the trustee does not master major-general then it is a tilt. sent12: if the advection does contain then it is a kind of a Muslim. sent13: the barbell is a catarrhine if it does brad Cyclophorus. sent14: if the tangle does not master major-general and is a tilt then the trustee is not uncontroversial. sent15: The Cyclophorus does brad advection. sent16: if the barbell is a stephanion it is not non-catarrhine. sent17: the fact that if the advection brads Cyclophorus then the advection is a inexpensiveness is right. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Muslim and does demote magnetosphere does not hold. sent19: if the linendraper is not evidentiary either it masters chebab or it is a Adige or both. sent20: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Muslim and does demote magnetosphere is not right then the linendraper is not evidentiary. sent21: the barbell either is a kind of a stephanion or brads Cyclophorus or both if it is not a feint. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent20 -> int1: the linendraper is not evidentiary.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the linendraper masters chebab and/or it is a kind of a Adige.; int2 & sent2 & sent9 -> int3: the ignition is a Balsaminaceae.; int3 -> int4: the ignition is a Balsaminaceae and/or uncontroversial.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the trustee does not master major-general.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the trustee is a kind of a tilt.; sent17 & sent8 -> int7: the advection is a kind of a inexpensiveness.; __UNKNOWN__