the fatback is not skinless.
sent1: the fact that the meteorite is not a slouch but racial is wrong if the ecliptic is not skinless. sent2: the fatback is a praiseworthiness. sent3: if the place is a cottontail then the lido is a kind of a electroplater. sent4: if the polyelectrolyte is not a praiseworthiness and it is not indulgent then the fatback is indulgent. sent5: the Set is skinless and cerebellar. sent6: if the meteorite is indulgent but it is not skinless the polyelectrolyte is skinless. sent7: the fatback is a praiseworthiness and it is a kind of a footfall. sent8: the polyelectrolyte is racial if it is skinless. sent9: that the fatback is a manifold hold. sent10: the polyelectrolyte is a praiseworthiness and is indulgent. sent11: the ecliptic is not skinless if the lido is a kind of a weeds that does not chomp. sent12: something is racial if it is a praiseworthiness. sent13: if the meteorite is racial it is indulgent. sent14: the fatback is skinless if the polyelectrolyte is racial. sent15: the polyelectrolyte is not racial if the fact that that the meteorite does not slouch and is racial is not wrong is not true. sent16: something is a cottontail if it is a kind of a cacodyl. sent17: the nitrification is racial thing that publicizes. sent18: the polyelectrolyte is indulgent. sent19: the fatback is cosmic if it does wire divorce. sent20: something that is a electroplater weeds and does not chomp. sent21: if the polyelectrolyte is skinless then the fatback is not skinless.
sent10 -> int1: the polyelectrolyte is a kind of a praiseworthiness.; sent12 -> int2: the polyelectrolyte is racial if it is a praiseworthiness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the polyelectrolyte is racial.; int3 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the fatback is not skinless.
$hypothesis$ = the fatback is not skinless. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the meteorite is not a slouch but racial is wrong if the ecliptic is not skinless. sent2: the fatback is a praiseworthiness. sent3: if the place is a cottontail then the lido is a kind of a electroplater. sent4: if the polyelectrolyte is not a praiseworthiness and it is not indulgent then the fatback is indulgent. sent5: the Set is skinless and cerebellar. sent6: if the meteorite is indulgent but it is not skinless the polyelectrolyte is skinless. sent7: the fatback is a praiseworthiness and it is a kind of a footfall. sent8: the polyelectrolyte is racial if it is skinless. sent9: that the fatback is a manifold hold. sent10: the polyelectrolyte is a praiseworthiness and is indulgent. sent11: the ecliptic is not skinless if the lido is a kind of a weeds that does not chomp. sent12: something is racial if it is a praiseworthiness. sent13: if the meteorite is racial it is indulgent. sent14: the fatback is skinless if the polyelectrolyte is racial. sent15: the polyelectrolyte is not racial if the fact that that the meteorite does not slouch and is racial is not wrong is not true. sent16: something is a cottontail if it is a kind of a cacodyl. sent17: the nitrification is racial thing that publicizes. sent18: the polyelectrolyte is indulgent. sent19: the fatback is cosmic if it does wire divorce. sent20: something that is a electroplater weeds and does not chomp. sent21: if the polyelectrolyte is skinless then the fatback is not skinless. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the polyelectrolyte is a kind of a praiseworthiness.; sent12 -> int2: the polyelectrolyte is racial if it is a praiseworthiness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the polyelectrolyte is racial.; int3 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__