there exists something such that if it is greenhouse thing that is not a substitution it is not a kind of a aerophile.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of cherty thing that is not a fishpond then it does not perambulate. sent2: the snot is not a aerophile if it is a greenhouse and it is not a substitution. sent3: if something is both a dog-ear and not a vibraphone then it is not a kind of a aerophile. sent4: something does not devein cosmologist if it does watch homeless and is not allotropic. sent5: there is something such that if it is a greenhouse and it is a substitution it is not a kind of a aerophile. sent6: if the snot is a yellow but it is not orthographic it is not a kind of a foghorn. sent7: the snot does not watch democratization if it does cram escadrille and it is not a kind of a urbanity. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a greenhouse that is not a substitution then it is a aerophile. sent9: if the snot is a aerophile but it is not an interplay then it is not a dauntlessness. sent10: if the snot is a greenhouse that is not unconquerable then it does not hum innings. sent11: the hyperope is not a greenhouse if it is not grammatical and it is not arboreal. sent12: the snot is a aerophile if it is a kind of a greenhouse that is not a substitution. sent13: if the snot is greenhouse and is a substitution that it is not a aerophile hold. sent14: if the snot is satiate but it is not a aerophile the fact that it is not pneumatics is true. sent15: if the terebinth is both a dog-ear and not a aerophile then it does not angle.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it watches homeless and is not allotropic it does not devein cosmologist.
sent4 -> int1: that the Astragalus does not devein cosmologist is not wrong if it watches homeless and is not allotropic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is greenhouse thing that is not a substitution it is not a kind of a aerophile. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of cherty thing that is not a fishpond then it does not perambulate. sent2: the snot is not a aerophile if it is a greenhouse and it is not a substitution. sent3: if something is both a dog-ear and not a vibraphone then it is not a kind of a aerophile. sent4: something does not devein cosmologist if it does watch homeless and is not allotropic. sent5: there is something such that if it is a greenhouse and it is a substitution it is not a kind of a aerophile. sent6: if the snot is a yellow but it is not orthographic it is not a kind of a foghorn. sent7: the snot does not watch democratization if it does cram escadrille and it is not a kind of a urbanity. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a greenhouse that is not a substitution then it is a aerophile. sent9: if the snot is a aerophile but it is not an interplay then it is not a dauntlessness. sent10: if the snot is a greenhouse that is not unconquerable then it does not hum innings. sent11: the hyperope is not a greenhouse if it is not grammatical and it is not arboreal. sent12: the snot is a aerophile if it is a kind of a greenhouse that is not a substitution. sent13: if the snot is greenhouse and is a substitution that it is not a aerophile hold. sent14: if the snot is satiate but it is not a aerophile the fact that it is not pneumatics is true. sent15: if the terebinth is both a dog-ear and not a aerophile then it does not angle. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__