the fact that the fact that not the geeing but the carunculateness occurs is incorrect if the fact that the slaughter happens hold does not hold.
sent1: if the slaughter does not occur and/or the resubmitting Townsend happens the resubmitting Townsend occurs. sent2: that not the geeing but the carunculateness occurs causes the cartographicness. sent3: the mercurialness does not occur if the dissenting occurs. sent4: if both the geeing and the carunculateness occurs the cartographicness occurs. sent5: the fact that the dissent occurs is true. sent6: the geeing does not occur. sent7: the cartographicness does not occur if the fact that the inexplicableness happens and the cartographicness happens does not hold. sent8: the carunculateness occurs. sent9: the slaughter does not occur if the fact that the cartographicness occurs is correct. sent10: if the angling occurs that that the decentralization occurs and the resubmitting parathion occurs is incorrect is not incorrect. sent11: the non-cartographicness brings about that that the slaughter does not occur or that the resubmitting Townsend occurs or both is not wrong. sent12: the perceptibleness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slaughter occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the geeing does not occur and the carunculateness happens is not false.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the cartographicness happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the slaughter does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the geeing does not occur but the carunculateness happens does not hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the resubmitting Townsend occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that not the geeing but the carunculateness occurs is incorrect if the fact that the slaughter happens hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the slaughter does not occur and/or the resubmitting Townsend happens the resubmitting Townsend occurs. sent2: that not the geeing but the carunculateness occurs causes the cartographicness. sent3: the mercurialness does not occur if the dissenting occurs. sent4: if both the geeing and the carunculateness occurs the cartographicness occurs. sent5: the fact that the dissent occurs is true. sent6: the geeing does not occur. sent7: the cartographicness does not occur if the fact that the inexplicableness happens and the cartographicness happens does not hold. sent8: the carunculateness occurs. sent9: the slaughter does not occur if the fact that the cartographicness occurs is correct. sent10: if the angling occurs that that the decentralization occurs and the resubmitting parathion occurs is incorrect is not incorrect. sent11: the non-cartographicness brings about that that the slaughter does not occur or that the resubmitting Townsend occurs or both is not wrong. sent12: the perceptibleness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slaughter occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the geeing does not occur and the carunculateness happens is not false.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the cartographicness happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the slaughter does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the geeing does not occur but the carunculateness happens does not hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__