the fact that the switcher is not Singhalese is not incorrect.
sent1: if something is not a sparerib it is Singhalese thing that does batten. sent2: something orders if it is not vegetative. sent3: the fact that the shingle is not a sparerib and it is not systematic is not true if there is something such that it is not vegetative. sent4: if something is not a sparerib it is not vegetative. sent5: the fact that the shingle is not a kind of a sparerib but it is insecticidal is not correct. sent6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a batten. sent7: the supermodel is vegetative if the fact that the switcher is not Singhalese and is not a kind of an order is false. sent8: if the supermodel does order then the languisher is vegetative. sent9: if the switcher is not systematic the fact that it is not Singhalese is not wrong. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a batten then that the shingle is not a sparerib and it is not insecticidal is false. sent11: the fact that the shingle is a sparerib but it is not insecticidal is false. sent12: the fact that the shingle is a sparerib but it is not insecticidal is not right if there is something such that it does not batten. sent13: that the switcher is non-vegetative thing that is systematic is false if the languisher is non-vegetative. sent14: if something that is insecticidal is an order then it is not a kind of a sparerib. sent15: if the shingle is insecticidal the switcher is insecticidal. sent16: if the fact that the shingle is not a sparerib and it is not insecticidal is not right the supermodel does order. sent17: there exists something such that it is a batten. sent18: if that something is not vegetative and is systematic does not hold it is not Singhalese. sent19: that the languisher is not a kind of a sparerib and it is not vegetative does not hold. sent20: the switcher is a kind of a Syrian.
sent6 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the shingle is both not a sparerib and not insecticidal is not false is incorrect.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the supermodel is an order is correct.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the languisher is vegetative.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: that the fact that the switcher is not vegetative but it is systematic is not false is incorrect.; sent18 -> int5: the switcher is not Singhalese if that it is a kind of non-vegetative thing that is systematic does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the switcher is Singhalese.
sent1 -> int6: the switcher is Singhalese and it battens if it is not a kind of a sparerib.; sent14 -> int7: if the switcher is insecticidal and an order it is not a kind of a sparerib.; sent2 -> int8: if the switcher is not vegetative it is an order.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the switcher is not Singhalese is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a sparerib it is Singhalese thing that does batten. sent2: something orders if it is not vegetative. sent3: the fact that the shingle is not a sparerib and it is not systematic is not true if there is something such that it is not vegetative. sent4: if something is not a sparerib it is not vegetative. sent5: the fact that the shingle is not a kind of a sparerib but it is insecticidal is not correct. sent6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a batten. sent7: the supermodel is vegetative if the fact that the switcher is not Singhalese and is not a kind of an order is false. sent8: if the supermodel does order then the languisher is vegetative. sent9: if the switcher is not systematic the fact that it is not Singhalese is not wrong. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a batten then that the shingle is not a sparerib and it is not insecticidal is false. sent11: the fact that the shingle is a sparerib but it is not insecticidal is false. sent12: the fact that the shingle is a sparerib but it is not insecticidal is not right if there is something such that it does not batten. sent13: that the switcher is non-vegetative thing that is systematic is false if the languisher is non-vegetative. sent14: if something that is insecticidal is an order then it is not a kind of a sparerib. sent15: if the shingle is insecticidal the switcher is insecticidal. sent16: if the fact that the shingle is not a sparerib and it is not insecticidal is not right the supermodel does order. sent17: there exists something such that it is a batten. sent18: if that something is not vegetative and is systematic does not hold it is not Singhalese. sent19: that the languisher is not a kind of a sparerib and it is not vegetative does not hold. sent20: the switcher is a kind of a Syrian. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the shingle is both not a sparerib and not insecticidal is not false is incorrect.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the supermodel is an order is correct.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the languisher is vegetative.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: that the fact that the switcher is not vegetative but it is systematic is not false is incorrect.; sent18 -> int5: the switcher is not Singhalese if that it is a kind of non-vegetative thing that is systematic does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__