the tenpins is open-hearth.
sent1: the incinerator does dado. sent2: that something is not Himalayan and it is not naturistic is incorrect if it is irreducible. sent3: if something that is not a flare does clangor sigmoidoscope it is a Nitella. sent4: the tenpins is open-hearth if the antimuon is not naturistic. sent5: the antimuon is a kind of a Nitella if there is something such that it is not inalienable. sent6: something is not open-hearth if it does not clangor sigmoidoscope. sent7: that if the fact that something is non-Himalayan thing that is not naturistic is not right it is not a dado is correct. sent8: that the incinerator is not a Nitella but it is Himalayan is not right. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not a selenology and is not loamy is incorrect. sent10: if that the antimuon is not Himalayan and is naturistic is not correct the tenpins is open-hearth. sent11: the tureen is not non-Himalayan. sent12: if the gulping is a Marshall then that the antimuon is both non-Himalayan and naturistic is false. sent13: the antimuon clangors sigmoidoscope. sent14: the incinerator clangors sigmoidoscope and it is a dado. sent15: the fact that the gulping does not flare hold if there is something such that it is a Marshall and a Nitella. sent16: the gulping clangors sigmoidoscope. sent17: the tenpins is a Nitella. sent18: the sigmoidoscope is not irreducible. sent19: the antimuon is a kind of a flare if the incinerator is not Himalayan. sent20: everything does not clangor dovecote. sent21: that something is not a Urey and it is not a kind of a Marshall is incorrect if it does not clangor dovecote. sent22: the antimuon is a Marshall if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Urey and not a Marshall is false. sent23: there exists something such that it is not inalienable. sent24: the gulping is a Marshall if the incinerator is a Nitella.
sent14 -> int1: the incinerator does clangor sigmoidoscope.; sent3 -> int2: the incinerator is a kind of a Nitella if it is not a kind of a flare and it clangors sigmoidoscope.;
the tenpins is not open-hearth.
sent21 -> int3: if the banneret does not clangor dovecote the fact that it is not a Urey and it is not a Marshall is false.; sent20 -> int4: that the banneret does not clangor dovecote is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the banneret is both not a Urey and not a Marshall is not true.; int5 -> int6: there is nothing such that it is not a Urey and it is not a Marshall.; int6 -> int7: that the end-plate is not a Urey and it is not a Marshall is not true.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Urey and it is not a kind of a Marshall is not correct.; sent22 & int8 -> int9: the antimuon is a kind of a Marshall.; sent23 & sent5 -> int10: the antimuon is a Nitella.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the antimuon is a Marshall that is a kind of a Nitella.; int11 -> int12: something is a Marshall and it is a Nitella.; sent15 & int12 -> int13: the gulping does not flare.; sent2 -> int14: if the incinerator is irreducible that it is not Himalayan and it is not naturistic is not true.; sent7 -> int15: the incinerator is not a dado if that it is both non-Himalayan and not naturistic is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the tenpins is open-hearth. ; $context$ = sent1: the incinerator does dado. sent2: that something is not Himalayan and it is not naturistic is incorrect if it is irreducible. sent3: if something that is not a flare does clangor sigmoidoscope it is a Nitella. sent4: the tenpins is open-hearth if the antimuon is not naturistic. sent5: the antimuon is a kind of a Nitella if there is something such that it is not inalienable. sent6: something is not open-hearth if it does not clangor sigmoidoscope. sent7: that if the fact that something is non-Himalayan thing that is not naturistic is not right it is not a dado is correct. sent8: that the incinerator is not a Nitella but it is Himalayan is not right. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not a selenology and is not loamy is incorrect. sent10: if that the antimuon is not Himalayan and is naturistic is not correct the tenpins is open-hearth. sent11: the tureen is not non-Himalayan. sent12: if the gulping is a Marshall then that the antimuon is both non-Himalayan and naturistic is false. sent13: the antimuon clangors sigmoidoscope. sent14: the incinerator clangors sigmoidoscope and it is a dado. sent15: the fact that the gulping does not flare hold if there is something such that it is a Marshall and a Nitella. sent16: the gulping clangors sigmoidoscope. sent17: the tenpins is a Nitella. sent18: the sigmoidoscope is not irreducible. sent19: the antimuon is a kind of a flare if the incinerator is not Himalayan. sent20: everything does not clangor dovecote. sent21: that something is not a Urey and it is not a kind of a Marshall is incorrect if it does not clangor dovecote. sent22: the antimuon is a Marshall if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Urey and not a Marshall is false. sent23: there exists something such that it is not inalienable. sent24: the gulping is a Marshall if the incinerator is a Nitella. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the incinerator does clangor sigmoidoscope.; sent3 -> int2: the incinerator is a kind of a Nitella if it is not a kind of a flare and it clangors sigmoidoscope.; __UNKNOWN__