if the enlarger does caper arrayed the centerfield is maxillodental.
sent1: the fuddy-duddy capers arrayed and it is bright if something is a ammobium. sent2: the subsection does caper landmark. sent3: the Lombard does not caper Kera if the enlarger capers arrayed and is bright. sent4: something is a kind of a ammobium. sent5: the enlarger does caper Kera if there is something such that it is bright. sent6: the fact that something is not a kind of a Statehouse and is a kind of a control is incorrect if it is not bright. sent7: that something is both not monoclonal and not maxillodental is incorrect if it capers Kera. sent8: the spherocyte does not bog propertied. sent9: if that something does not caper Kera and it does not bog sunroof is not true then it does caper Kera. sent10: if that the enlarger is a kind of a monoclonal is correct the fuddy-duddy is monoclonal. sent11: if that the enlarger is not a monoclonal and not maxillodental is not correct it is monoclonal. sent12: there exists something such that that it is violable and a slag does not hold. sent13: if something is bright it does bog propertied. sent14: The propertied does not bog Lombard. sent15: if the Lombard is a thrill then that the enlarger does not caper Kera and it does not bog sunroof is wrong. sent16: the centerfield is maxillodental if the Lombard does not caper Kera and it does not bog propertied. sent17: if there is something such that that that it is not violable and it is a slag hold does not hold then the enlarger is bright. sent18: the Lombard does not bog propertied.
the fuddy-duddy does bog propertied and it is a kind of a monoclonal.
sent13 -> int1: if the fuddy-duddy is bright the fact that it bogs propertied is right.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the fuddy-duddy does caper arrayed and is bright.; int2 -> int3: the fuddy-duddy is bright.; int1 & int3 -> int4: the fuddy-duddy does bog propertied.; sent7 -> int5: the fact that the enlarger is not monoclonal and it is not maxillodental does not hold if the fact that it capers Kera is right.; sent9 -> int6: if the fact that the fact that the enlarger does not caper Kera and it does not bog sunroof does not hold hold it does caper Kera.;
$hypothesis$ = if the enlarger does caper arrayed the centerfield is maxillodental. ; $context$ = sent1: the fuddy-duddy capers arrayed and it is bright if something is a ammobium. sent2: the subsection does caper landmark. sent3: the Lombard does not caper Kera if the enlarger capers arrayed and is bright. sent4: something is a kind of a ammobium. sent5: the enlarger does caper Kera if there is something such that it is bright. sent6: the fact that something is not a kind of a Statehouse and is a kind of a control is incorrect if it is not bright. sent7: that something is both not monoclonal and not maxillodental is incorrect if it capers Kera. sent8: the spherocyte does not bog propertied. sent9: if that something does not caper Kera and it does not bog sunroof is not true then it does caper Kera. sent10: if that the enlarger is a kind of a monoclonal is correct the fuddy-duddy is monoclonal. sent11: if that the enlarger is not a monoclonal and not maxillodental is not correct it is monoclonal. sent12: there exists something such that that it is violable and a slag does not hold. sent13: if something is bright it does bog propertied. sent14: The propertied does not bog Lombard. sent15: if the Lombard is a thrill then that the enlarger does not caper Kera and it does not bog sunroof is wrong. sent16: the centerfield is maxillodental if the Lombard does not caper Kera and it does not bog propertied. sent17: if there is something such that that that it is not violable and it is a slag hold does not hold then the enlarger is bright. sent18: the Lombard does not bog propertied. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__