that the involution occurs brings about that the raptorialness happens.
sent1: the glimpse and/or that the neoplasticness does not occur prevents the culturalness. sent2: either the glimpse or the non-neoplasticness or both occurs if the referring Vaseline does not occur. sent3: the lockout does not occur if that the lockout but not the glimpse happens is not correct. sent4: the raptorialness happens if the counterweighting wetter does not occur and the culturalness does not occur. sent5: that the lockout does not occur causes that the culturalness happens and the raptorialness happens. sent6: the counterweighting wetter does not occur and the transferring singleness does not occur if the involution does not occur. sent7: the branchiateness and the lockout occurs. sent8: the branchiateness does not occur if the counterweighting wetter happens and the involution occurs. sent9: the referring Vaseline does not occur. sent10: if the transferring cloister does not occur the Hellenicness occurs and/or the harmoniousness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the counterweighting wetter happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the involution occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the counterweighting wetter and the involution happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the branchiateness does not occur.; sent7 -> int3: the branchiateness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the counterweighting wetter does not occur.; sent2 & sent9 -> int6: the glimpsing occurs and/or the neoplasticness does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the culturalness does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the counterweighting wetter does not occur and the culturalness does not occur.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the raptorialness occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the transferring singleness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the involution occurs brings about that the raptorialness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the glimpse and/or that the neoplasticness does not occur prevents the culturalness. sent2: either the glimpse or the non-neoplasticness or both occurs if the referring Vaseline does not occur. sent3: the lockout does not occur if that the lockout but not the glimpse happens is not correct. sent4: the raptorialness happens if the counterweighting wetter does not occur and the culturalness does not occur. sent5: that the lockout does not occur causes that the culturalness happens and the raptorialness happens. sent6: the counterweighting wetter does not occur and the transferring singleness does not occur if the involution does not occur. sent7: the branchiateness and the lockout occurs. sent8: the branchiateness does not occur if the counterweighting wetter happens and the involution occurs. sent9: the referring Vaseline does not occur. sent10: if the transferring cloister does not occur the Hellenicness occurs and/or the harmoniousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the counterweighting wetter happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the involution occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the counterweighting wetter and the involution happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the branchiateness does not occur.; sent7 -> int3: the branchiateness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the counterweighting wetter does not occur.; sent2 & sent9 -> int6: the glimpsing occurs and/or the neoplasticness does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the culturalness does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the counterweighting wetter does not occur and the culturalness does not occur.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the raptorialness occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__