the accumulator is a kind of a peel that is pneumonic.
sent1: the fucoid does not rotate Avogadro if that the beetroot is not a works but it chords is false. sent2: the fucoid is not thoughtful but it is a kind of a myrmecophyte if it is not impious. sent3: if something is impious it is a myrmecophyte. sent4: that something is a peel and it is pneumonic is not correct if it is not impious. sent5: if the fucoid is not a peel and it is not impious then the fullerene is impious. sent6: the accumulator is not a quittance but it cambers fucoid. sent7: something is both pneumonic and a Bloemfontein if it does not rotate Avogadro. sent8: the fact that the softball is not a myrmecophyte is not false. sent9: the fucoid is not impious. sent10: if the fucoid is not thoughtful the accumulator is a peel. sent11: the fucoid is a myrmecophyte if it is not impious. sent12: if the accumulator is not thoughtful the fucoid is pneumonic. sent13: if something does not rotate Avogadro then the fact that it is a kind of a Bloemfontein and is impious is not true. sent14: the fucoid is a myrmecophyte. sent15: the accumulator is pneumonic. sent16: that the fucoid does not rotate Avogadro is correct if it is not a chord but a works. sent17: if something is gerundial that that it is not a works and it does chord is not false is not right.
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the fucoid is not thoughtful and is a myrmecophyte.; int1 -> int2: the fucoid is non-thoughtful.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the accumulator is a kind of a peel.; int3 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the accumulator does peel and it is pneumonic is incorrect.
sent4 -> int4: if that the accumulator is not impious is correct that it peels and is pneumonic is not true.; sent13 -> int5: if the fucoid does not rotate Avogadro the fact that it is a Bloemfontein and impious is not right.; sent17 -> int6: the fact that the beetroot is not a works and chords is wrong if the fact that it is gerundial is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the accumulator is a kind of a peel that is pneumonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fucoid does not rotate Avogadro if that the beetroot is not a works but it chords is false. sent2: the fucoid is not thoughtful but it is a kind of a myrmecophyte if it is not impious. sent3: if something is impious it is a myrmecophyte. sent4: that something is a peel and it is pneumonic is not correct if it is not impious. sent5: if the fucoid is not a peel and it is not impious then the fullerene is impious. sent6: the accumulator is not a quittance but it cambers fucoid. sent7: something is both pneumonic and a Bloemfontein if it does not rotate Avogadro. sent8: the fact that the softball is not a myrmecophyte is not false. sent9: the fucoid is not impious. sent10: if the fucoid is not thoughtful the accumulator is a peel. sent11: the fucoid is a myrmecophyte if it is not impious. sent12: if the accumulator is not thoughtful the fucoid is pneumonic. sent13: if something does not rotate Avogadro then the fact that it is a kind of a Bloemfontein and is impious is not true. sent14: the fucoid is a myrmecophyte. sent15: the accumulator is pneumonic. sent16: that the fucoid does not rotate Avogadro is correct if it is not a chord but a works. sent17: if something is gerundial that that it is not a works and it does chord is not false is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the fucoid is not thoughtful and is a myrmecophyte.; int1 -> int2: the fucoid is non-thoughtful.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the accumulator is a kind of a peel.; int3 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__