if the conscientiousness does not occur then the dripping and the debuting metamorphism happens.
sent1: the knockout does not occur and the wiring does not occur if the furloughing unpalatability happens. sent2: the dripping does not occur if the fact that the dripping happens but the debuting metamorphism does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the debuting metamorphism occurs and the flipping happens is correct if the wiring does not occur. sent4: the fact that the furloughing unpalatability happens is not wrong. sent5: that the tunneling preconditioned happens triggers the conscientiousness. sent6: the dripping occurs if the tunneling preconditioned does not occur. sent7: that the dripping happens and the debuting metamorphism does not occur is incorrect if the flipping occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tunneling preconditioned occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the conscientiousness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conscientiousness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the tunneling preconditioned does not occur is right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the drip occurs.; sent1 & sent4 -> int5: the knockout does not occur and the wiring does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the wiring does not occur.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the debuting metamorphism occurs and the flipping occurs.; int7 -> int8: the debuting metamorphism occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: both the dripping and the debuting metamorphism occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the pyknoticness does not occur and the debuting maintenance does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the conscientiousness does not occur then the dripping and the debuting metamorphism happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the knockout does not occur and the wiring does not occur if the furloughing unpalatability happens. sent2: the dripping does not occur if the fact that the dripping happens but the debuting metamorphism does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the debuting metamorphism occurs and the flipping happens is correct if the wiring does not occur. sent4: the fact that the furloughing unpalatability happens is not wrong. sent5: that the tunneling preconditioned happens triggers the conscientiousness. sent6: the dripping occurs if the tunneling preconditioned does not occur. sent7: that the dripping happens and the debuting metamorphism does not occur is incorrect if the flipping occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tunneling preconditioned occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the conscientiousness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conscientiousness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the tunneling preconditioned does not occur is right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the drip occurs.; sent1 & sent4 -> int5: the knockout does not occur and the wiring does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the wiring does not occur.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the debuting metamorphism occurs and the flipping occurs.; int7 -> int8: the debuting metamorphism occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: both the dripping and the debuting metamorphism occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__