if the stadium is a hickory the coastland does tinkle Christendom but it is not stable.
sent1: if something learns then it is not inexhaustible and it is digital. sent2: the stadium is not inexhaustible if it does learn. sent3: the cobble is not inexhaustible. sent4: the coastland is not a stable if the stadium does not learn. sent5: the outsole tinkles Christendom. sent6: the outsole is digital. sent7: if something is inaccessible it is not non-metric and it is a Symplocus. sent8: the stadium is a kind of a hickory and does not tinkle Christendom. sent9: the kirtle is digital. sent10: the coastland does not learn and is inexhaustible if it does stable. sent11: if the coastland is digital then it is not a hickory and is not unstable. sent12: the stadium does not tinkle Christendom. sent13: that something is exhaustible is right if it does learn. sent14: the outsole is not inexhaustible but it does personify malcontent. sent15: the coastland is not digital if the stadium does not tinkle Christendom. sent16: if that the outsole tinkles Christendom is correct then the coastland does tinkles Christendom. sent17: the teaspoon is a kind of a ephemerality that is not digital. sent18: the stadium is not inexhaustible. sent19: the outsole learns. sent20: the stadium is not a kind of a hickory if it is not inexhaustible and it is digital. sent21: if the stadium is non-inexhaustible thing that is digital then it is a hickory. sent22: that the stadium is not a hickory is not wrong if it is inexhaustible and it is digital. sent23: The Christendom tinkles outsole.
sent1 -> int1: if the stadium learns then it is a kind of exhaustible thing that is digital.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the stadium learns is not false.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the stadium is not inexhaustible but it is digital.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the stadium is not a hickory.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stadium is a hickory.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the stadium does not learn hold.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the coastland is not a stable.; sent16 & sent5 -> int7: the coastland does tinkle Christendom.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the coastland does tinkle Christendom but it is not a stable.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the stadium is a hickory the coastland does tinkle Christendom but it is not stable. ; $context$ = sent1: if something learns then it is not inexhaustible and it is digital. sent2: the stadium is not inexhaustible if it does learn. sent3: the cobble is not inexhaustible. sent4: the coastland is not a stable if the stadium does not learn. sent5: the outsole tinkles Christendom. sent6: the outsole is digital. sent7: if something is inaccessible it is not non-metric and it is a Symplocus. sent8: the stadium is a kind of a hickory and does not tinkle Christendom. sent9: the kirtle is digital. sent10: the coastland does not learn and is inexhaustible if it does stable. sent11: if the coastland is digital then it is not a hickory and is not unstable. sent12: the stadium does not tinkle Christendom. sent13: that something is exhaustible is right if it does learn. sent14: the outsole is not inexhaustible but it does personify malcontent. sent15: the coastland is not digital if the stadium does not tinkle Christendom. sent16: if that the outsole tinkles Christendom is correct then the coastland does tinkles Christendom. sent17: the teaspoon is a kind of a ephemerality that is not digital. sent18: the stadium is not inexhaustible. sent19: the outsole learns. sent20: the stadium is not a kind of a hickory if it is not inexhaustible and it is digital. sent21: if the stadium is non-inexhaustible thing that is digital then it is a hickory. sent22: that the stadium is not a hickory is not wrong if it is inexhaustible and it is digital. sent23: The Christendom tinkles outsole. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the stadium learns then it is a kind of exhaustible thing that is digital.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the stadium learns is not false.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the stadium is not inexhaustible but it is digital.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the stadium is not a hickory.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stadium is a hickory.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the stadium does not learn hold.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the coastland is not a stable.; sent16 & sent5 -> int7: the coastland does tinkle Christendom.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the coastland does tinkle Christendom but it is not a stable.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__