the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is a worst that is limnological is wrong then it is not argentic is not correct.
sent1: if the gizzard is not worst it is not argentic. sent2: there is something such that if it is not limnological it is not argentic. sent3: the chokecherry is not a kind of a spank if that that it does modify and it is corvine is not false is incorrect. sent4: the gizzard is not argentic if it is worst and it is limnological. sent5: there is something such that if that it is distributional and it does japan Jungian does not hold then it is a irrepressibility. sent6: there is something such that if it is worst thing that is limnological it is not argentic. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it modifies and it is a conservancy is wrong it is a kind of a wax. sent8: something is not Muhammadan if that it is a beacon and Ruritanian is incorrect. sent9: that there is something such that if the fact that it is a Photius and does japan whitewashed is not true then it is not memberless is true. sent10: if the fact that something is a tern and subarctic does not hold then it is non-limnological. sent11: if the fact that something incinerates and it is a jug is false that it is not a xeroradiography is right. sent12: the gizzard is non-argentic if that it is worst and is limnological does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the gizzard is a worst that is limnological is false it is argentic. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is zygomatic and it does sensitize internationalization is not true it contributes feat. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a crucifixion and a falls is incorrect it is not a kind of a saddle. sent16: there exists something such that if it is non-worst it is not argentic. sent17: the fact that the gizzard is argentic hold if that it is judgmental and it is a kind of a Hokusai is not right. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it contributes feat and is a kind of a steppe is wrong then it is a nub. sent19: there is something such that if that that it is esophageal and is a Noruz is correct does not hold then it does sensitize grouping.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
that that the gizzard is Muhammadan is true is incorrect if that it is a beacon and is a Ruritanian is not correct.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is a worst that is limnological is wrong then it is not argentic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gizzard is not worst it is not argentic. sent2: there is something such that if it is not limnological it is not argentic. sent3: the chokecherry is not a kind of a spank if that that it does modify and it is corvine is not false is incorrect. sent4: the gizzard is not argentic if it is worst and it is limnological. sent5: there is something such that if that it is distributional and it does japan Jungian does not hold then it is a irrepressibility. sent6: there is something such that if it is worst thing that is limnological it is not argentic. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it modifies and it is a conservancy is wrong it is a kind of a wax. sent8: something is not Muhammadan if that it is a beacon and Ruritanian is incorrect. sent9: that there is something such that if the fact that it is a Photius and does japan whitewashed is not true then it is not memberless is true. sent10: if the fact that something is a tern and subarctic does not hold then it is non-limnological. sent11: if the fact that something incinerates and it is a jug is false that it is not a xeroradiography is right. sent12: the gizzard is non-argentic if that it is worst and is limnological does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the gizzard is a worst that is limnological is false it is argentic. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is zygomatic and it does sensitize internationalization is not true it contributes feat. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a crucifixion and a falls is incorrect it is not a kind of a saddle. sent16: there exists something such that if it is non-worst it is not argentic. sent17: the fact that the gizzard is argentic hold if that it is judgmental and it is a kind of a Hokusai is not right. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it contributes feat and is a kind of a steppe is wrong then it is a nub. sent19: there is something such that if that that it is esophageal and is a Noruz is correct does not hold then it does sensitize grouping. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__