the strikeout does not occur if that the intolerantness does not occur hold.
sent1: the fact that the non-episcopalness and the non-chiasmalness occurs is false if the intolerantness does not occur. sent2: if the astomatalness does not occur then that the reorienting reservist occurs but the generationalness does not occur is not right. sent3: if the fact that the outnumbering Jesuit does not occur is right then that the exclusion does not occur and the Anglican does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the fact that the non-episcopalness and the chiasmalness happens is correct is not correct if the intolerantness does not occur. sent5: the induction does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the non-episcopalness and the non-chiasmalness happens is not correct the strikeout does not occur. sent7: the dyslexicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the intolerantness does not occur is true.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-episcopalness and the non-chiasmalness occurs does not hold.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the strikeout does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the strikeout does not occur if that the intolerantness does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the non-episcopalness and the non-chiasmalness occurs is false if the intolerantness does not occur. sent2: if the astomatalness does not occur then that the reorienting reservist occurs but the generationalness does not occur is not right. sent3: if the fact that the outnumbering Jesuit does not occur is right then that the exclusion does not occur and the Anglican does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the fact that the non-episcopalness and the chiasmalness happens is correct is not correct if the intolerantness does not occur. sent5: the induction does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the non-episcopalness and the non-chiasmalness happens is not correct the strikeout does not occur. sent7: the dyslexicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the intolerantness does not occur is true.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-episcopalness and the non-chiasmalness occurs does not hold.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the strikeout does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__