the non-affinedness and the uncivilness occurs.
sent1: if the affined occurs that both the tolerableness and the absence occurs is not correct. sent2: that the believing aeschynanthus does not occur yields that the reporting taken does not occur and the separationism occurs. sent3: the absence does not occur. sent4: the uncivilness occurs and the tack occurs. sent5: that the reporting taken does not occur prevents that the affined occurs. sent6: that the tack happens is not false. sent7: the separationism occurs. sent8: if that both the non-intolerableness and the absence occurs does not hold the intolerableness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the believing aeschynanthus happens is not wrong.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the believing aeschynanthus happens and the absence does not occur.; sent4 -> int2: the uncivilness occurs.;
not the billiardsness but the intolerableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the non-affinedness and the uncivilness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the affined occurs that both the tolerableness and the absence occurs is not correct. sent2: that the believing aeschynanthus does not occur yields that the reporting taken does not occur and the separationism occurs. sent3: the absence does not occur. sent4: the uncivilness occurs and the tack occurs. sent5: that the reporting taken does not occur prevents that the affined occurs. sent6: that the tack happens is not false. sent7: the separationism occurs. sent8: if that both the non-intolerableness and the absence occurs does not hold the intolerableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the believing aeschynanthus happens is not wrong.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the believing aeschynanthus happens and the absence does not occur.; sent4 -> int2: the uncivilness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__