that the pet is a tolazamide but it is not a courbaril is not correct.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a tolazamide it is not a kind of an irreverence and is not apologetic. sent2: everything is a cattalo. sent3: if the fact that the Protropin is not perinasal and/or it gutters Daphne does not hold the fact that it is not a kind of a spoilsport is false. sent4: the fact that either the oilfield is not nonsignificant or it is not annalistic or both does not hold if the gurney is not annalistic. sent5: if something is not a worsted but it expectorates then the fact that it is not a courbaril is not incorrect. sent6: the pet is non-worsted thing that expectorates. sent7: if there is something such that it is unusual then the fact that the witchgrass is harmless but it is not a kind of a milestone does not hold. sent8: the oilfield is not nonsignificant if the warhorse either is not a worsted or does not expectorate or both. sent9: there is nothing that is not perinasal and/or does gutter Daphne. sent10: if the fact that something is harmless thing that is not a milestone is wrong it is not a Sonchus. sent11: the sleepwalker is not a courbaril. sent12: something is not nonsignificant or it is not annalistic or both if it is a kind of a cattalo. sent13: if the oilfield is not nonsignificant then the gurney is a kind of a courbaril and it is annalistic. sent14: if that something is not nonsignificant and it is not annalistic is not true it is not a tolazamide. sent15: if the melter is not unusual and does gutter Gerbert the coenzyme is not unusual. sent16: the pet is a tolazamide if something that is not a flagellant is not a luthier. sent17: if that the gurney is not a flagellant and it is not a luthier is wrong then it is not annalistic. sent18: the melter is a kind of non-unusual thing that does gutter Gerbert if the Protropin is a kind of a spoilsport. sent19: the warhorse is a cattalo if there exists something such that that it is not a Sonchus is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gurney is both not a flagellant and not a luthier is wrong.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the gurney is not annalistic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the oilfield is not nonsignificant and/or it is not annalistic is incorrect.; sent12 -> int3: if the oilfield is a cattalo then the fact that it is either significant or non-annalistic or both hold.; sent2 -> int4: the oilfield is a kind of a cattalo.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the oilfield is not nonsignificant and/or is not annalistic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the gurney is not a flagellant and not a luthier.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a flagellant and is not a luthier.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the pet is a tolazamide.; sent5 -> int10: the fact that the pet is not a courbaril is not wrong if it is non-worsted and it expectorates.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the pet is not a courbaril.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
that the pet is a tolazamide but it is not a courbaril does not hold.
sent10 -> int12: the witchgrass is not a Sonchus if that it is harmless but not a milestone does not hold.; sent9 -> int13: the fact that the Protropin is not perinasal and/or it does gutter Daphne does not hold.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the Protropin is a spoilsport is not wrong.; sent18 & int14 -> int15: the melter is a kind of non-unusual thing that does gutter Gerbert.; sent15 & int15 -> int16: the coenzyme is not non-unusual.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it is unusual hold.; int17 & sent7 -> int18: the fact that the witchgrass is harmless but it is not a milestone does not hold.; int12 & int18 -> int19: the witchgrass is not a Sonchus.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that that it is not a Sonchus is correct.; int20 & sent19 -> int21: the warhorse is a kind of a cattalo.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pet is a tolazamide but it is not a courbaril is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a tolazamide it is not a kind of an irreverence and is not apologetic. sent2: everything is a cattalo. sent3: if the fact that the Protropin is not perinasal and/or it gutters Daphne does not hold the fact that it is not a kind of a spoilsport is false. sent4: the fact that either the oilfield is not nonsignificant or it is not annalistic or both does not hold if the gurney is not annalistic. sent5: if something is not a worsted but it expectorates then the fact that it is not a courbaril is not incorrect. sent6: the pet is non-worsted thing that expectorates. sent7: if there is something such that it is unusual then the fact that the witchgrass is harmless but it is not a kind of a milestone does not hold. sent8: the oilfield is not nonsignificant if the warhorse either is not a worsted or does not expectorate or both. sent9: there is nothing that is not perinasal and/or does gutter Daphne. sent10: if the fact that something is harmless thing that is not a milestone is wrong it is not a Sonchus. sent11: the sleepwalker is not a courbaril. sent12: something is not nonsignificant or it is not annalistic or both if it is a kind of a cattalo. sent13: if the oilfield is not nonsignificant then the gurney is a kind of a courbaril and it is annalistic. sent14: if that something is not nonsignificant and it is not annalistic is not true it is not a tolazamide. sent15: if the melter is not unusual and does gutter Gerbert the coenzyme is not unusual. sent16: the pet is a tolazamide if something that is not a flagellant is not a luthier. sent17: if that the gurney is not a flagellant and it is not a luthier is wrong then it is not annalistic. sent18: the melter is a kind of non-unusual thing that does gutter Gerbert if the Protropin is a kind of a spoilsport. sent19: the warhorse is a cattalo if there exists something such that that it is not a Sonchus is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gurney is both not a flagellant and not a luthier is wrong.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the gurney is not annalistic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the oilfield is not nonsignificant and/or it is not annalistic is incorrect.; sent12 -> int3: if the oilfield is a cattalo then the fact that it is either significant or non-annalistic or both hold.; sent2 -> int4: the oilfield is a kind of a cattalo.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the oilfield is not nonsignificant and/or is not annalistic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the gurney is not a flagellant and not a luthier.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a flagellant and is not a luthier.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the pet is a tolazamide.; sent5 -> int10: the fact that the pet is not a courbaril is not wrong if it is non-worsted and it expectorates.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the pet is not a courbaril.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__