the fact that there is something such that if it sets then it is technophobic is right.
sent1: the broadcaster is a Pyrex and it sighs indapamide. sent2: the broadcaster is a kind of a biquadratic. sent3: the broadcaster is a chrysotherapy. sent4: something is a West and is not a chrysotherapy if it does not set. sent5: there exists something such that if it does sigh roundsman then that it is not concretistic does not hold. sent6: the broadcaster is a kind of a vessel. sent7: if something is a martingale then it is not non-technophobic. sent8: there is something such that if that it is a vessel is correct then it is a prostaglandin. sent9: if something that is a chrysotherapy is a setting it is not a Landau. sent10: the broadcaster is econometrics if it does level nasopharynx.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadcaster sets.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the broadcaster is a chrysotherapy and is a setting.; sent9 -> int2: if the broadcaster is both a chrysotherapy and a setting it is not a Landau.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the broadcaster is not a kind of a Landau.; sent7 -> int4: if the broadcaster is a martingale then it is technophobic.;
the broadcaster is a kind of a West.
sent4 -> int5: the broadcaster is a West but it is not a chrysotherapy if it is not a setting.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it sets then it is technophobic is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the broadcaster is a Pyrex and it sighs indapamide. sent2: the broadcaster is a kind of a biquadratic. sent3: the broadcaster is a chrysotherapy. sent4: something is a West and is not a chrysotherapy if it does not set. sent5: there exists something such that if it does sigh roundsman then that it is not concretistic does not hold. sent6: the broadcaster is a kind of a vessel. sent7: if something is a martingale then it is not non-technophobic. sent8: there is something such that if that it is a vessel is correct then it is a prostaglandin. sent9: if something that is a chrysotherapy is a setting it is not a Landau. sent10: the broadcaster is econometrics if it does level nasopharynx. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadcaster sets.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the broadcaster is a chrysotherapy and is a setting.; sent9 -> int2: if the broadcaster is both a chrysotherapy and a setting it is not a Landau.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the broadcaster is not a kind of a Landau.; sent7 -> int4: if the broadcaster is a martingale then it is technophobic.; __UNKNOWN__