that the suggester does ebb ullage is true.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a Adelaide then it is a kind of a Glaser and does manacle rushlight. sent2: the fact that the orthicon is not funerary or not a talon or both is wrong. sent3: something does ebb ullage if it is cadastral. sent4: that something is not a kind of a Pegasus but it is a Adelaide if the fact that it is not a kind of a Glaser hold is not false. sent5: the danewort is a Glaser if there is something such that it manacles rushlight. sent6: the Hanoverian is not a Adelaide. sent7: the danewort does manacle rushlight if there exists something such that it is acidimetric. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it does manacle electron is not wrong. sent9: something is acidimetric. sent10: the de-iodinase is not cadastral if that the danewort is allophonic but it is not funerary does not hold. sent11: that the danewort is cadastral hold. sent12: that the danewort is not allophonic and/or it is not funerary is false. sent13: if the suggester is not a kind of a Pegasus but it is a Adelaide then the fact that it is cadastral hold. sent14: the suggester is a Girru. sent15: if the coolie is not a Pegasus then the suggester is not a kind of a Pegasus. sent16: there is something such that it is allophonic and it does ebb ullage. sent17: the suggester is not funerary and is a Adelaide. sent18: the suggester is not a kind of a Glaser if that something is funerary thing that does manacle rushlight is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the danewort is not funerary.; assump1 -> int1: either the danewort is not allophonic or it is not funerary or both.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the danewort is funerary is true.; sent9 & sent7 -> int4: that the danewort manacles rushlight hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the danewort is funerary and does manacle rushlight.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a kind of funerary thing that does manacle rushlight.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the suggester is not a Glaser.; sent4 -> int8: if the suggester is not a Glaser then it is both not a Pegasus and a Adelaide.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the suggester is not a Pegasus and is a Adelaide is not wrong.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the suggester is cadastral.; sent3 -> int11: if the suggester is cadastral then it does ebb ullage.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the de-iodinase is not cadastral.
sent1 -> int12: if that the suggester is not a Adelaide hold then it is a Glaser that manacles rushlight.;
$hypothesis$ = that the suggester does ebb ullage is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a Adelaide then it is a kind of a Glaser and does manacle rushlight. sent2: the fact that the orthicon is not funerary or not a talon or both is wrong. sent3: something does ebb ullage if it is cadastral. sent4: that something is not a kind of a Pegasus but it is a Adelaide if the fact that it is not a kind of a Glaser hold is not false. sent5: the danewort is a Glaser if there is something such that it manacles rushlight. sent6: the Hanoverian is not a Adelaide. sent7: the danewort does manacle rushlight if there exists something such that it is acidimetric. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it does manacle electron is not wrong. sent9: something is acidimetric. sent10: the de-iodinase is not cadastral if that the danewort is allophonic but it is not funerary does not hold. sent11: that the danewort is cadastral hold. sent12: that the danewort is not allophonic and/or it is not funerary is false. sent13: if the suggester is not a kind of a Pegasus but it is a Adelaide then the fact that it is cadastral hold. sent14: the suggester is a Girru. sent15: if the coolie is not a Pegasus then the suggester is not a kind of a Pegasus. sent16: there is something such that it is allophonic and it does ebb ullage. sent17: the suggester is not funerary and is a Adelaide. sent18: the suggester is not a kind of a Glaser if that something is funerary thing that does manacle rushlight is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the danewort is not funerary.; assump1 -> int1: either the danewort is not allophonic or it is not funerary or both.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the danewort is funerary is true.; sent9 & sent7 -> int4: that the danewort manacles rushlight hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the danewort is funerary and does manacle rushlight.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a kind of funerary thing that does manacle rushlight.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the suggester is not a Glaser.; sent4 -> int8: if the suggester is not a Glaser then it is both not a Pegasus and a Adelaide.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the suggester is not a Pegasus and is a Adelaide is not wrong.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the suggester is cadastral.; sent3 -> int11: if the suggester is cadastral then it does ebb ullage.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__