that the unbending Podicipedidae occurs and the wink does not occur is brought about by the destruction.
sent1: the metatarsal happens. sent2: if that the convoying chalice happens and the waxing does not occur is not true then the destruction occurs. sent3: the teasing canvasback happens if the fact that the winking happens and the destruction does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the waxing occurs that the destruction does not occur is not wrong. sent5: if the winking happens the fact that the convoying chalice occurs and the waxing does not occur is not true. sent6: if the teasing underproduction does not occur then the mud-brickness occurs. sent7: the teasing underproduction does not occur. sent8: both the unbending Podicipedidae and the mud-brickness occurs if the teasing underproduction does not occur. sent9: the fact that the convoying chalice happens and the waxing happens is not correct. sent10: the mud-brickness happens. sent11: that the convoying chalice and the waxing happens is not correct if the winking occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the winking happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the convoying chalice but not the waxing occurs does not hold.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the destruction occurs.; sent8 & sent7 -> int2: the unbending Podicipedidae and the mud-brickness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the unbending Podicipedidae occurs.;
the teasing canvasback happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the unbending Podicipedidae occurs and the wink does not occur is brought about by the destruction. ; $context$ = sent1: the metatarsal happens. sent2: if that the convoying chalice happens and the waxing does not occur is not true then the destruction occurs. sent3: the teasing canvasback happens if the fact that the winking happens and the destruction does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the waxing occurs that the destruction does not occur is not wrong. sent5: if the winking happens the fact that the convoying chalice occurs and the waxing does not occur is not true. sent6: if the teasing underproduction does not occur then the mud-brickness occurs. sent7: the teasing underproduction does not occur. sent8: both the unbending Podicipedidae and the mud-brickness occurs if the teasing underproduction does not occur. sent9: the fact that the convoying chalice happens and the waxing happens is not correct. sent10: the mud-brickness happens. sent11: that the convoying chalice and the waxing happens is not correct if the winking occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the winking happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the convoying chalice but not the waxing occurs does not hold.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the destruction occurs.; sent8 & sent7 -> int2: the unbending Podicipedidae and the mud-brickness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the unbending Podicipedidae occurs.; __UNKNOWN__