there exists something such that if it does not decline the fact that it is not prophetic and it is non-tactical is not right.
sent1: if the plywood does not decline that it is prophetic and is not tactical is not correct. sent2: if the plywood declines then that it is both not prophetic and not tactical is incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a hysteroscopy then the fact that it is not cytotoxic and it is not agonal does not hold. sent4: if something is not a kind of a Tudor then that it is not a flare and it is not Luxembourgian is not true. sent5: the fact that something is not an airspace and does not smash henry is wrong if it is not karyokinetic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a decline then that it is prophetic and it is not tactical is false. sent7: if something declines the fact that it is not prophetic and is not tactical does not hold. sent8: if the plywood is not a decline then that it is not prophetic and is tactical is not right. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a decline then it is not prophetic and it is not tactical. sent10: if something does not decline the fact that that it is not prophetic but tactical hold is false. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a decline hold the fact that it is a kind of unprophetic thing that is tactical does not hold. sent12: that the plywood does not smash clubroom and is not tactical is not right if it is not nondisposable. sent13: the fact that something is prophetic but it is not tactical is not correct if it is not a kind of a decline. sent14: if something is not a decline the fact that it is not prophetic and is not tactical is true.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not decline the fact that it is not prophetic and it is non-tactical is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the plywood does not decline that it is prophetic and is not tactical is not correct. sent2: if the plywood declines then that it is both not prophetic and not tactical is incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a hysteroscopy then the fact that it is not cytotoxic and it is not agonal does not hold. sent4: if something is not a kind of a Tudor then that it is not a flare and it is not Luxembourgian is not true. sent5: the fact that something is not an airspace and does not smash henry is wrong if it is not karyokinetic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a decline then that it is prophetic and it is not tactical is false. sent7: if something declines the fact that it is not prophetic and is not tactical does not hold. sent8: if the plywood is not a decline then that it is not prophetic and is tactical is not right. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a decline then it is not prophetic and it is not tactical. sent10: if something does not decline the fact that that it is not prophetic but tactical hold is false. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a decline hold the fact that it is a kind of unprophetic thing that is tactical does not hold. sent12: that the plywood does not smash clubroom and is not tactical is not right if it is not nondisposable. sent13: the fact that something is prophetic but it is not tactical is not correct if it is not a kind of a decline. sent14: if something is not a decline the fact that it is not prophetic and is not tactical is true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__