the fact that the dormancy and the non-medicalness happens if the enticement does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the dormancy happens and the medicalness occurs if the enticement does not occur. sent2: if that the attack and the pyrolatry occurs does not hold the whistling Blida does not occur. sent3: the ineffectiveness happens but the regimentation does not occur. sent4: the breast but not the attack happens. sent5: if that the ropiness does not occur hold then the climax but not the mandibulofacialness occurs. sent6: that both the exhaling condom and the drink happens is not right. sent7: that both the exhaling Unitarianism and the joyride happens does not hold. sent8: if the enticement does not occur then the dormancy occurs. sent9: that the whistling neoliberal does not occur and the smiting femtometer does not occur is false. sent10: that the smiting carriageway does not occur and the enticement happens does not hold. sent11: if that the dormancy happens but the medicalness does not occur does not hold the smiting carriageway does not occur. sent12: if the dormancy does not occur then the smiting carriageway does not occur. sent13: that the bacteriophagicness occurs and the hysteroscopy occurs does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the bacteriophagicness occurs and the hysteroscopy happens is not correct then the break does not occur. sent15: the ropiness occurs if that the breaking does not occur and the smiting carriageway occurs is not right. sent16: the fact that the smiting carriageway does not occur and the enticement does not occur is wrong if the breaking does not occur. sent17: the beam does not occur if that the whistling cattleman occurs and the supertwister occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that the dormancy occurs but the medicalness does not occur is not right hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the smiting carriageway does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the enticement does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the smiting carriageway does not occur and the enticement does not occur.; sent14 & sent13 -> int3: the break does not occur.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that the smiting carriageway does not occur and the enticement does not occur does not hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: both the dormancy and the non-medicalness happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the ropiness happens but the whistling Blida does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dormancy and the non-medicalness happens if the enticement does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the dormancy happens and the medicalness occurs if the enticement does not occur. sent2: if that the attack and the pyrolatry occurs does not hold the whistling Blida does not occur. sent3: the ineffectiveness happens but the regimentation does not occur. sent4: the breast but not the attack happens. sent5: if that the ropiness does not occur hold then the climax but not the mandibulofacialness occurs. sent6: that both the exhaling condom and the drink happens is not right. sent7: that both the exhaling Unitarianism and the joyride happens does not hold. sent8: if the enticement does not occur then the dormancy occurs. sent9: that the whistling neoliberal does not occur and the smiting femtometer does not occur is false. sent10: that the smiting carriageway does not occur and the enticement happens does not hold. sent11: if that the dormancy happens but the medicalness does not occur does not hold the smiting carriageway does not occur. sent12: if the dormancy does not occur then the smiting carriageway does not occur. sent13: that the bacteriophagicness occurs and the hysteroscopy occurs does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the bacteriophagicness occurs and the hysteroscopy happens is not correct then the break does not occur. sent15: the ropiness occurs if that the breaking does not occur and the smiting carriageway occurs is not right. sent16: the fact that the smiting carriageway does not occur and the enticement does not occur is wrong if the breaking does not occur. sent17: the beam does not occur if that the whistling cattleman occurs and the supertwister occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that the dormancy occurs but the medicalness does not occur is not right hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the smiting carriageway does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the enticement does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the smiting carriageway does not occur and the enticement does not occur.; sent14 & sent13 -> int3: the break does not occur.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that the smiting carriageway does not occur and the enticement does not occur does not hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: both the dormancy and the non-medicalness happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__