the cadastralness does not occur.
sent1: the summation does not occur if the wolflikeness happens and the controversy occurs. sent2: the fact that the abrasion does not occur and the cadastralness does not occur does not hold if the powdering does not occur. sent3: the launching lactobacillus occurs and the collecting Dalmatian occurs. sent4: the wolflikeness happens and the uncoiling occurs if the chicken does not occur. sent5: the rhinotomy or the non-unseductiveness or both prevents that the unseductiveness happens. sent6: if the launching lactobacillus occurs the hobbyism does not occur and the chicken does not occur. sent7: that the extricableness does not occur and the modernism does not occur is incorrect if the depredation does not occur. sent8: the controversy happens if that the extricableness does not occur and the modernism does not occur does not hold. sent9: the formality happens and the launching malfunctioning occurs. sent10: the crystallization occurs and the flabbergasting twitch occurs if the summation does not occur. sent11: if that both the misappropriation and the depredation occurs is wrong the depredation does not occur. sent12: the fact that the powdering does not occur and the unseductiveness happens is correct. sent13: the abrasion does not occur if the formality and the launching malfunctioning occurs. sent14: the rhinotomy happens or the unseductiveness does not occur or both if the fact that the flabbergasting twitch occurs is not incorrect. sent15: the powdering does not occur or the abrasion occurs or both if the unseductiveness does not occur.
sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the abrasion does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cadastralness does not occur hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the abrasion does not occur and the cadastralness does not occur.; sent12 -> int3: the powder does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the abrasion does not occur and the cadastralness does not occur is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the cadastralness does not occur.
sent3 -> int6: the launching lactobacillus occurs.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the hobbyism does not occur and the chicken does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the chicken does not occur.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the wolflikeness occurs and the uncoiling happens.; int9 -> int10: the wolflikeness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the cadastralness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the summation does not occur if the wolflikeness happens and the controversy occurs. sent2: the fact that the abrasion does not occur and the cadastralness does not occur does not hold if the powdering does not occur. sent3: the launching lactobacillus occurs and the collecting Dalmatian occurs. sent4: the wolflikeness happens and the uncoiling occurs if the chicken does not occur. sent5: the rhinotomy or the non-unseductiveness or both prevents that the unseductiveness happens. sent6: if the launching lactobacillus occurs the hobbyism does not occur and the chicken does not occur. sent7: that the extricableness does not occur and the modernism does not occur is incorrect if the depredation does not occur. sent8: the controversy happens if that the extricableness does not occur and the modernism does not occur does not hold. sent9: the formality happens and the launching malfunctioning occurs. sent10: the crystallization occurs and the flabbergasting twitch occurs if the summation does not occur. sent11: if that both the misappropriation and the depredation occurs is wrong the depredation does not occur. sent12: the fact that the powdering does not occur and the unseductiveness happens is correct. sent13: the abrasion does not occur if the formality and the launching malfunctioning occurs. sent14: the rhinotomy happens or the unseductiveness does not occur or both if the fact that the flabbergasting twitch occurs is not incorrect. sent15: the powdering does not occur or the abrasion occurs or both if the unseductiveness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the abrasion does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cadastralness does not occur hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the abrasion does not occur and the cadastralness does not occur.; sent12 -> int3: the powder does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the abrasion does not occur and the cadastralness does not occur is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__