the hydroelectricity is not a kind of a skincare.
sent1: the celom is not unappealable and does not excel. sent2: if that something is not a SSA and it is not a gawkiness does not hold it does not deserve mobocracy. sent3: the fact that something does not deserve mobocracy and is not a littoral is not right if that it does not consecrate is not wrong. sent4: something that is not a gawkiness does not consecrate and does not deserve cymule. sent5: the fact that the hydroelectricity is not a SSA and it does not resist hidden does not hold. sent6: if the tricyclic consecrates then the hydroelectricity is a kind of a skincare. sent7: if the fact that the hydroelectricity is not a SSA and does not resist hidden is false it is not a gawkiness. sent8: the hydroelectricity is not a kind of a gawkiness if it resists hidden. sent9: the fact that the hydroelectricity does not deserve mobocracy but it is littoral is not true if the fact that it does not consecrate is right.
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the hydroelectricity is not a gawkiness.; sent4 -> int2: the hydroelectricity does not consecrate and does not deserve cymule if it is not a gawkiness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hydroelectricity does not consecrate and does not deserve cymule.; int3 -> int4: the hydroelectricity does not consecrate.; sent3 -> int5: that the fact that the hydroelectricity does not deserve mobocracy and it is non-littoral is true is not true if it does not consecrate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the hydroelectricity does not deserve mobocracy and is not a kind of a littoral does not hold.;
the hydroelectricity is a skincare.
$hypothesis$ = the hydroelectricity is not a kind of a skincare. ; $context$ = sent1: the celom is not unappealable and does not excel. sent2: if that something is not a SSA and it is not a gawkiness does not hold it does not deserve mobocracy. sent3: the fact that something does not deserve mobocracy and is not a littoral is not right if that it does not consecrate is not wrong. sent4: something that is not a gawkiness does not consecrate and does not deserve cymule. sent5: the fact that the hydroelectricity is not a SSA and it does not resist hidden does not hold. sent6: if the tricyclic consecrates then the hydroelectricity is a kind of a skincare. sent7: if the fact that the hydroelectricity is not a SSA and does not resist hidden is false it is not a gawkiness. sent8: the hydroelectricity is not a kind of a gawkiness if it resists hidden. sent9: the fact that the hydroelectricity does not deserve mobocracy but it is littoral is not true if the fact that it does not consecrate is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the hydroelectricity is not a gawkiness.; sent4 -> int2: the hydroelectricity does not consecrate and does not deserve cymule if it is not a gawkiness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hydroelectricity does not consecrate and does not deserve cymule.; int3 -> int4: the hydroelectricity does not consecrate.; sent3 -> int5: that the fact that the hydroelectricity does not deserve mobocracy and it is non-littoral is true is not true if it does not consecrate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the hydroelectricity does not deserve mobocracy and is not a kind of a littoral does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__