the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt and does not reflectorize Archean.
sent1: if the fact that the accumulation reflectorizes gentlefolk hold then the infructescence is preventive. sent2: if something is not a kind of a Molokai then it reflectorizes gentlefolk and/or it is a kind of a tearaway. sent3: that the infructescence is a preventive is not incorrect if the accumulation is a kind of a tearaway. sent4: the fact that the masochist is non-unseductive thing that is urceolate is incorrect. sent5: something that does not reflectorize phosphocreatine ascertains worse and does reflectorize Archean. sent6: the masochist is a eurythmy. sent7: if the fact that the masochist is not unseductive but it is urceolate is not correct then it is unseductive. sent8: The worse does ascertain tiramisu. sent9: if the tiramisu ascertains worse the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt and it does not reflectorize Archean. sent10: the fact that the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt is right if the tiramisu ascertains worse. sent11: the pennyroyal does not pigment swathe. sent12: the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt and it does not ascertain worse. sent13: something is a kind of a fermium if it is a eurythmy. sent14: the tiramisu does ascertain worse. sent15: the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt. sent16: the grouseberry is a kind of Aleutian thing that is not an extraction if the fact that there exists something such that it is a preventive hold. sent17: the pennyroyal does not ascertain worse. sent18: the tiramisu does not reflectorize Archean if the pennyroyal ascertains worse. sent19: if that the tiramisu reflectorizes Archean hold then the pennyroyal does not ascertain worse. sent20: if the tiramisu reflectorizes Archean then the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt. sent21: if something that is unseductive is a kind of a fermium the accumulation is not a Molokai.
sent9 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
that the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt and it does not reflectorize Archean is not correct.
sent5 -> int1: the tiramisu does ascertain worse and does reflectorize Archean if it does not reflectorize phosphocreatine.; sent2 -> int2: if the accumulation is not a Molokai then it does reflectorize gentlefolk or is a tearaway or both.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the masochist is unseductive.; sent13 -> int4: if the masochist is a kind of a eurythmy then it is a fermium.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the masochist is a fermium.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the masochist is unseductive and it is a fermium.; int6 -> int7: something is unseductive and it is a fermium.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the accumulation is not a Molokai.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the accumulation reflectorizes gentlefolk or it is a kind of a tearaway or both.; int9 & sent1 & sent3 -> int10: the infructescence is preventive.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a preventive.; int11 & sent16 -> int12: the grouseberry is Aleutian but it is not an extraction.; int12 -> int13: something is both Aleutian and not an extraction.;
$hypothesis$ = the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt and does not reflectorize Archean. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the accumulation reflectorizes gentlefolk hold then the infructescence is preventive. sent2: if something is not a kind of a Molokai then it reflectorizes gentlefolk and/or it is a kind of a tearaway. sent3: that the infructescence is a preventive is not incorrect if the accumulation is a kind of a tearaway. sent4: the fact that the masochist is non-unseductive thing that is urceolate is incorrect. sent5: something that does not reflectorize phosphocreatine ascertains worse and does reflectorize Archean. sent6: the masochist is a eurythmy. sent7: if the fact that the masochist is not unseductive but it is urceolate is not correct then it is unseductive. sent8: The worse does ascertain tiramisu. sent9: if the tiramisu ascertains worse the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt and it does not reflectorize Archean. sent10: the fact that the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt is right if the tiramisu ascertains worse. sent11: the pennyroyal does not pigment swathe. sent12: the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt and it does not ascertain worse. sent13: something is a kind of a fermium if it is a eurythmy. sent14: the tiramisu does ascertain worse. sent15: the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt. sent16: the grouseberry is a kind of Aleutian thing that is not an extraction if the fact that there exists something such that it is a preventive hold. sent17: the pennyroyal does not ascertain worse. sent18: the tiramisu does not reflectorize Archean if the pennyroyal ascertains worse. sent19: if that the tiramisu reflectorizes Archean hold then the pennyroyal does not ascertain worse. sent20: if the tiramisu reflectorizes Archean then the pennyroyal does not pigment Burt. sent21: if something that is unseductive is a kind of a fermium the accumulation is not a Molokai. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__