if the fact that the bunghole does not hare and does disabuse tippet does not hold the porkchop is a banner.
sent1: something is cyclic and it is organizational if it is not a kind of a strategy. sent2: something is Norman if it is a kind of a Ceratopogonidae. sent3: the porkchop is a kind of a banner if that the bunghole is a kind of a hare and it disabuses tippet does not hold. sent4: if something is not monistic it is a Ceratopogonidae and it is a banner. sent5: if the fact that the jodhpurs does disabuse blustering and is a kind of a strategy does not hold then it is not a strategy. sent6: that the bunghole is a kind of a Norman is not wrong if the fact that the jodhpurs does not disabuse tippet and hares is incorrect. sent7: the shad is a Ceratopogonidae. sent8: the porkchop is a banner if the bunghole is not a hare and does disabuse tippet. sent9: if the bunghole does not disabuse tippet the porkchop is a banner. sent10: if the jodhpurs is not a malodorousness but non-monistic then that the bunghole is not non-monistic hold. sent11: the jodhpurs is Norman if the bunghole does not disabuse tippet. sent12: something is a CEO. sent13: the jodhpurs is Norman if the bunghole is not a hare and disabuses tippet. sent14: the jodhpurs does disabuse tippet. sent15: the fact that the bunghole is not a hare does not hold. sent16: if the jodhpurs is cyclic then it is not a malodorousness and is non-monistic. sent17: the jodhpurs is Norman if that the bunghole is a hare and it disabuses tippet is not true. sent18: the pfannkuchen is a Norman if the bunghole is a kind of a Norman. sent19: if the fact that the pouter is a Ceratopogonidae is right then the porkchop is a banner. sent20: if that that the bunghole does not hare and does disabuse tippet is right is wrong the jodhpurs is a kind of a Norman.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bunghole is not a hare but it does disabuse tippet does not hold.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the jodhpurs is a kind of a Norman.;
the pfannkuchen is Norman.
sent2 -> int2: the bunghole is Norman if it is a kind of a Ceratopogonidae.; sent4 -> int3: if the bunghole is not monistic then it is both a Ceratopogonidae and a banner.; sent1 -> int4: that if the jodhpurs is not the strategy then the jodhpurs is a kind of cyclic thing that is organizational is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the bunghole does not hare and does disabuse tippet does not hold the porkchop is a banner. ; $context$ = sent1: something is cyclic and it is organizational if it is not a kind of a strategy. sent2: something is Norman if it is a kind of a Ceratopogonidae. sent3: the porkchop is a kind of a banner if that the bunghole is a kind of a hare and it disabuses tippet does not hold. sent4: if something is not monistic it is a Ceratopogonidae and it is a banner. sent5: if the fact that the jodhpurs does disabuse blustering and is a kind of a strategy does not hold then it is not a strategy. sent6: that the bunghole is a kind of a Norman is not wrong if the fact that the jodhpurs does not disabuse tippet and hares is incorrect. sent7: the shad is a Ceratopogonidae. sent8: the porkchop is a banner if the bunghole is not a hare and does disabuse tippet. sent9: if the bunghole does not disabuse tippet the porkchop is a banner. sent10: if the jodhpurs is not a malodorousness but non-monistic then that the bunghole is not non-monistic hold. sent11: the jodhpurs is Norman if the bunghole does not disabuse tippet. sent12: something is a CEO. sent13: the jodhpurs is Norman if the bunghole is not a hare and disabuses tippet. sent14: the jodhpurs does disabuse tippet. sent15: the fact that the bunghole is not a hare does not hold. sent16: if the jodhpurs is cyclic then it is not a malodorousness and is non-monistic. sent17: the jodhpurs is Norman if that the bunghole is a hare and it disabuses tippet is not true. sent18: the pfannkuchen is a Norman if the bunghole is a kind of a Norman. sent19: if the fact that the pouter is a Ceratopogonidae is right then the porkchop is a banner. sent20: if that that the bunghole does not hare and does disabuse tippet is right is wrong the jodhpurs is a kind of a Norman. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bunghole is not a hare but it does disabuse tippet does not hold.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the jodhpurs is a kind of a Norman.; __UNKNOWN__