the filer does nominate.
sent1: if the signor is a battery and not polyatomic then the filer is not polyatomic. sent2: the fact that the poppet is not scapulohumeral is not incorrect if the fact that the father is not scapulohumeral but it is a placidity does not hold. sent3: the signor is a kind of a battery and is not polyatomic. sent4: that the father is not scapulohumeral but it is a placidity does not hold. sent5: the poppet does dissociate droshky and it is a placidity. sent6: that that the platen does blow is not incorrect if the droshky does nominate is not incorrect. sent7: the signor is a battery. sent8: the fact that the fact that the father is scapulohumeral thing that is a placidity is right is wrong. sent9: if that something is not a kind of a term and it is not scapulohumeral does not hold then it is an otology. sent10: if the droshky is not a term then the filer is both a term and vulnerable. sent11: if something dissociates droshky and is a placidity it is not polyatomic. sent12: something is a blow if it is vulnerable. sent13: if a non-polyatomic thing does blow it does not nominate. sent14: if the droshky is not a term then the filer term. sent15: the filer is a kind of a term. sent16: the poppet is scapulohumeral if the droshky is a term. sent17: something terms and it nominates if it is not scapulohumeral. sent18: the fact that the poppet is not scapulohumeral is correct if the father is scapulohumeral. sent19: the Genoese is not a term. sent20: everything dissociates droshky and/or it is not a battery. sent21: the filer nominates and it is polyatomic if the signor does not nominates. sent22: the filer nominates if the fact that the droshky nominates is right. sent23: if the platen does blow then the fact that it is not a term and it is not scapulohumeral is incorrect. sent24: if the filer is vulnerable but it is not a kind of a placidity then the father is not a placidity. sent25: if something is not vulnerable and is a blow it is non-scapulohumeral.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the droshky does term.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the poppet is scapulohumeral hold.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the poppet is not scapulohumeral.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the droshky is not a kind of a term.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the filer is a term and it is vulnerable.; int5 -> int6: the filer is vulnerable.; sent12 -> int7: if the filer is vulnerable then it is a blow.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the filer does blow.; sent1 & sent3 -> int9: the filer is not polyatomic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the filer is a kind of non-polyatomic a blow.; sent13 -> int11: if the filer is not polyatomic and is a blow then it does not nominate.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the filer does nominate.
sent17 -> int12: the droshky is a kind of a term that does nominate if it is not scapulohumeral.; sent25 -> int13: if the droshky is not vulnerable and blows then it is not scapulohumeral.; sent11 -> int14: if the poppet does dissociate droshky and is a placidity then it is not polyatomic.; int14 & sent5 -> int15: the fact that the poppet is not polyatomic hold.; int15 -> int16: something is not polyatomic.;
$hypothesis$ = the filer does nominate. ; $context$ = sent1: if the signor is a battery and not polyatomic then the filer is not polyatomic. sent2: the fact that the poppet is not scapulohumeral is not incorrect if the fact that the father is not scapulohumeral but it is a placidity does not hold. sent3: the signor is a kind of a battery and is not polyatomic. sent4: that the father is not scapulohumeral but it is a placidity does not hold. sent5: the poppet does dissociate droshky and it is a placidity. sent6: that that the platen does blow is not incorrect if the droshky does nominate is not incorrect. sent7: the signor is a battery. sent8: the fact that the fact that the father is scapulohumeral thing that is a placidity is right is wrong. sent9: if that something is not a kind of a term and it is not scapulohumeral does not hold then it is an otology. sent10: if the droshky is not a term then the filer is both a term and vulnerable. sent11: if something dissociates droshky and is a placidity it is not polyatomic. sent12: something is a blow if it is vulnerable. sent13: if a non-polyatomic thing does blow it does not nominate. sent14: if the droshky is not a term then the filer term. sent15: the filer is a kind of a term. sent16: the poppet is scapulohumeral if the droshky is a term. sent17: something terms and it nominates if it is not scapulohumeral. sent18: the fact that the poppet is not scapulohumeral is correct if the father is scapulohumeral. sent19: the Genoese is not a term. sent20: everything dissociates droshky and/or it is not a battery. sent21: the filer nominates and it is polyatomic if the signor does not nominates. sent22: the filer nominates if the fact that the droshky nominates is right. sent23: if the platen does blow then the fact that it is not a term and it is not scapulohumeral is incorrect. sent24: if the filer is vulnerable but it is not a kind of a placidity then the father is not a placidity. sent25: if something is not vulnerable and is a blow it is non-scapulohumeral. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the droshky does term.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the poppet is scapulohumeral hold.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the poppet is not scapulohumeral.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the droshky is not a kind of a term.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the filer is a term and it is vulnerable.; int5 -> int6: the filer is vulnerable.; sent12 -> int7: if the filer is vulnerable then it is a blow.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the filer does blow.; sent1 & sent3 -> int9: the filer is not polyatomic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the filer is a kind of non-polyatomic a blow.; sent13 -> int11: if the filer is not polyatomic and is a blow then it does not nominate.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__