there exists something such that if it is not loose that it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and it is not phonological is wrong.
sent1: if the conventicle is not loose that it does squish Ta'ziyeh and it is not phonological is not true. sent2: if the conventicle is not loose then the fact that it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and is not phonological does not hold. sent3: if the recess does not squish Ta'ziyeh then that it is not a anopheline and it is not a amnesic is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not loose it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and is non-phonological. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not loose then that it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and is phonological is wrong. sent6: the conventicle does not squish Ta'ziyeh and it is not phonological if it is not loose. sent7: if the conventicle is not a Euler then that it is not a kind of an oblique and it does not salivate is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if it is loose then the fact that it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and is not phonological is not correct. sent9: the fact that the barber does not squish camper and it is not a kind of a groom is wrong if it is not a ridge. sent10: the fact that the sawyer does not repot instar and it does not entrench is wrong if it is not loose. sent11: that something does not squish spatchcock and is not pedal does not hold if it does not squish Ta'ziyeh. sent12: the fact that the conventicle does not squish Ta'ziyeh and it is not a streptobacillus is false if it is not biomedical. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a pawnshop then the fact that it is not Ibsenian and it is not a kind of a Arctocephalus is incorrect. sent14: that the conventicle does not squish Ta'ziyeh and it is non-phonological is not correct if it is loose. sent15: the fact that the conventicle does not squish Ta'ziyeh but it is phonological is not right if it is not loose. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not loose then that it squishes Ta'ziyeh and is not phonological is not right. sent17: if the condensate is not sufficient the fact that it is not a kind of a Tyr and it is not a kind of a cob is not right. sent18: if something is not tactile then that it is both not a dormancy and not limnological is not correct.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the monogamist is not tactile then that it is not a dormancy and it is not limnological does not hold.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not loose that it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and it is not phonological is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the conventicle is not loose that it does squish Ta'ziyeh and it is not phonological is not true. sent2: if the conventicle is not loose then the fact that it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and is not phonological does not hold. sent3: if the recess does not squish Ta'ziyeh then that it is not a anopheline and it is not a amnesic is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not loose it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and is non-phonological. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not loose then that it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and is phonological is wrong. sent6: the conventicle does not squish Ta'ziyeh and it is not phonological if it is not loose. sent7: if the conventicle is not a Euler then that it is not a kind of an oblique and it does not salivate is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if it is loose then the fact that it does not squish Ta'ziyeh and is not phonological is not correct. sent9: the fact that the barber does not squish camper and it is not a kind of a groom is wrong if it is not a ridge. sent10: the fact that the sawyer does not repot instar and it does not entrench is wrong if it is not loose. sent11: that something does not squish spatchcock and is not pedal does not hold if it does not squish Ta'ziyeh. sent12: the fact that the conventicle does not squish Ta'ziyeh and it is not a streptobacillus is false if it is not biomedical. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a pawnshop then the fact that it is not Ibsenian and it is not a kind of a Arctocephalus is incorrect. sent14: that the conventicle does not squish Ta'ziyeh and it is non-phonological is not correct if it is loose. sent15: the fact that the conventicle does not squish Ta'ziyeh but it is phonological is not right if it is not loose. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not loose then that it squishes Ta'ziyeh and is not phonological is not right. sent17: if the condensate is not sufficient the fact that it is not a kind of a Tyr and it is not a kind of a cob is not right. sent18: if something is not tactile then that it is both not a dormancy and not limnological is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__