the kieserite does not jellify tumidity and it does not jellify kieserite.
sent1: the kieserite does not drape lagoon if something either is exoteric or does exceed Pamlico or both. sent2: if the toxin is not courteous but it is a panpipe it is not carunculate. sent3: that the toxin is non-courteous thing that is a panpipe is correct. sent4: something is not carunculate. sent5: that the toxin is exoteric and not a panpipe is not correct if it does not drape lagoon. sent6: if something does not exceed Pamlico then it does not jellify tumidity and it does not jellify kieserite. sent7: the surgeonfish exceeds Pamlico if that it is a kind of non-carunculate a lectureship is wrong. sent8: the fact that the surgeonfish is non-carunculate thing that is a lectureship is not true if the toxin is carunculate. sent9: that the kieserite does not jellify tumidity and it does not jellify kieserite does not hold if it does not drape lagoon.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the toxin is non-carunculate.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the surgeonfish is non-carunculate but it is a lectureship is incorrect.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the surgeonfish exceeds Pamlico is true.; int3 -> int4: the surgeonfish either is exoteric or exceeds Pamlico or both.; int4 -> int5: something is exoteric or it does exceed Pamlico or both.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the kieserite does not drape lagoon.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the kieserite is a lectureship.
$hypothesis$ = the kieserite does not jellify tumidity and it does not jellify kieserite. ; $context$ = sent1: the kieserite does not drape lagoon if something either is exoteric or does exceed Pamlico or both. sent2: if the toxin is not courteous but it is a panpipe it is not carunculate. sent3: that the toxin is non-courteous thing that is a panpipe is correct. sent4: something is not carunculate. sent5: that the toxin is exoteric and not a panpipe is not correct if it does not drape lagoon. sent6: if something does not exceed Pamlico then it does not jellify tumidity and it does not jellify kieserite. sent7: the surgeonfish exceeds Pamlico if that it is a kind of non-carunculate a lectureship is wrong. sent8: the fact that the surgeonfish is non-carunculate thing that is a lectureship is not true if the toxin is carunculate. sent9: that the kieserite does not jellify tumidity and it does not jellify kieserite does not hold if it does not drape lagoon. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the toxin is non-carunculate.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the surgeonfish is non-carunculate but it is a lectureship is incorrect.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the surgeonfish exceeds Pamlico is true.; int3 -> int4: the surgeonfish either is exoteric or exceeds Pamlico or both.; int4 -> int5: something is exoteric or it does exceed Pamlico or both.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the kieserite does not drape lagoon.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__