the segregator is rotatory.
sent1: the sporophyll is a kind of a whiff. sent2: the subtracter is not a kind of a chiffon. sent3: the darmstadtium is a whiff if there exists something such that it is a chiffon. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a chiffon that mismanages capitalism is incorrect. sent5: if something is a chiffon it is a paperhanger and it is not rotatory. sent6: that the darmstadtium is a kind of a chiffon and does mismanage capitalism is not right. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is not a chiffon and it is rotatory is not correct then the fact that the darmstadtium is not a whiff is not right. sent8: there exists something such that that it does not mismanage bullheaded and it is a deaf does not hold. sent9: something is not a kind of a chiffon and mismanages capitalism. sent10: there is something such that it is a whiff. sent11: if the darmstadtium does not nickel naif it is a kind of non-excrescent thing that does not whiff. sent12: if the darmstadtium is a paperhanger but it is not rotatory then that the segregator is rotatory is not wrong. sent13: the cairngorm is not non-excrescent if there is something such that the fact that it is not a chiffon and does mismanage capitalism is not correct. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a paperhanger the fact that the darmstadtium is not a chiffon and mismanages capitalism does not hold. sent15: if a excrescent thing is a whiff the segregator is not rotatory. sent16: there exists something such that it organizes Antum. sent17: that the cairngorm bloodies is not incorrect. sent18: there exists something such that it is excrescent. sent19: something is not a paperhanger. sent20: the segregator is not a whiff. sent21: the fact that the cairngorm is a chiffon and it is rotatory does not hold if something is not a whiff. sent22: that the sporophyll is not a toy is correct. sent23: the cairngorm is a whiff if the sporophyll does whiff.
sent19 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the darmstadtium is not a chiffon and mismanages capitalism is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a chiffon and it does mismanage capitalism is not true.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the cairngorm is excrescent.; sent23 & sent1 -> int4: the cairngorm whiffs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cairngorm is excrescent and is a whiff.; int5 -> int6: something is both excrescent and a whiff.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the segregator is not non-rotatory.
sent5 -> int7: if the darmstadtium is a chiffon it is a kind of a paperhanger that is not rotatory.;
$hypothesis$ = the segregator is rotatory. ; $context$ = sent1: the sporophyll is a kind of a whiff. sent2: the subtracter is not a kind of a chiffon. sent3: the darmstadtium is a whiff if there exists something such that it is a chiffon. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a chiffon that mismanages capitalism is incorrect. sent5: if something is a chiffon it is a paperhanger and it is not rotatory. sent6: that the darmstadtium is a kind of a chiffon and does mismanage capitalism is not right. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is not a chiffon and it is rotatory is not correct then the fact that the darmstadtium is not a whiff is not right. sent8: there exists something such that that it does not mismanage bullheaded and it is a deaf does not hold. sent9: something is not a kind of a chiffon and mismanages capitalism. sent10: there is something such that it is a whiff. sent11: if the darmstadtium does not nickel naif it is a kind of non-excrescent thing that does not whiff. sent12: if the darmstadtium is a paperhanger but it is not rotatory then that the segregator is rotatory is not wrong. sent13: the cairngorm is not non-excrescent if there is something such that the fact that it is not a chiffon and does mismanage capitalism is not correct. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a paperhanger the fact that the darmstadtium is not a chiffon and mismanages capitalism does not hold. sent15: if a excrescent thing is a whiff the segregator is not rotatory. sent16: there exists something such that it organizes Antum. sent17: that the cairngorm bloodies is not incorrect. sent18: there exists something such that it is excrescent. sent19: something is not a paperhanger. sent20: the segregator is not a whiff. sent21: the fact that the cairngorm is a chiffon and it is rotatory does not hold if something is not a whiff. sent22: that the sporophyll is not a toy is correct. sent23: the cairngorm is a whiff if the sporophyll does whiff. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the darmstadtium is not a chiffon and mismanages capitalism is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a chiffon and it does mismanage capitalism is not true.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the cairngorm is excrescent.; sent23 & sent1 -> int4: the cairngorm whiffs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cairngorm is excrescent and is a whiff.; int5 -> int6: something is both excrescent and a whiff.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__