the gig does not dangle transcendentalist.
sent1: if the gig is a panorama then it does dangle transcendentalist. sent2: the anthology is a putz. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that it is not a da'wah and it does not leap Nuytsia is not false. sent4: something is not a panorama if it is not a kind of a putz and it is not Bruneian. sent5: the gig is not a da'wah. sent6: that the saltine leaps dinocerate and/or is trophotropic is not correct if that there exists something such that it does leap con hold. sent7: something does dangle transcendentalist if that it is not a kind of a putz and is not a panorama is wrong. sent8: something is not a kind of a putz and it is not a Bruneian if it is a relative. sent9: the vamp is a relative if that the undergarment does not dangle ethane and does not predestine portcullis is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a da'wah and it leaps Nuytsia is incorrect. sent11: if the anthology is a da'wah then the bullfinch is a da'wah. sent12: if the anthology is not a panorama then that the gig is not a putz and it is not a panorama is false. sent13: if the turmeric does leap obstruction then the fundraiser is a lever. sent14: the fundraiser is a lever if the turmeric is a kind of a lodgment. sent15: the turmeric is not a Rebel. sent16: the gig is a ramie. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a da'wah and does not leap Nuytsia is right does not hold then the anthology is not a panorama. sent18: that the gig does not dangle transcendentalist hold if that the turmeric is not a Rebel and it does not dangle transcendentalist is incorrect. sent19: if the vamp is not a panorama then the anthology is a da'wah or leaps Nuytsia or both. sent20: that something does not dangle ethane and it does not predestine portcullis is wrong if it is non-apopemptic. sent21: the bullfinch is a da'wah if the anthology leaps Nuytsia. sent22: that something is not hydrostatic but it is a kind of a nautilus does not hold if it is non-pyrotechnic. sent23: the turmeric leaps obstruction and/or it is a kind of a lodgment if it is not a Rebel. sent24: that the bullfinch is not a da'wah and it does not leap Nuytsia is false if that the fundraiser is a lever is not wrong. sent25: if the fact that something either does leap dinocerate or is trophotropic or both does not hold then it is not pyrotechnic. sent26: the corset does leap con. sent27: the fundraiser is not a kind of a lever if that the bullfinch is a da'wah is right.
sent23 & sent15 -> int1: either the turmeric leaps obstruction or it is a lodgment or both.; int1 & sent13 & sent14 -> int2: the fundraiser is a lever.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the fact that the bullfinch is not a da'wah and does not leap Nuytsia does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a da'wah and does not leap Nuytsia does not hold.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the anthology is not a panorama.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that the gig is both not a putz and not a panorama is wrong.; sent7 -> int7: if the fact that the gig is not a kind of a putz and it is not a panorama is false it does dangle transcendentalist.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the gig does not dangle transcendentalist.
sent4 -> int8: if the vamp is not a putz and is not a kind of a Bruneian it is not a panorama.; sent8 -> int9: if the vamp is a relative then it is not a putz and is non-Bruneian.; sent20 -> int10: if that the undergarment is not apopemptic is true then the fact that it does not dangle ethane and does not predestine portcullis does not hold.; sent22 -> int11: that the saltine is not hydrostatic but it is a nautilus is not correct if the fact that it is not pyrotechnic hold.; sent25 -> int12: if the fact that the saltine leaps dinocerate and/or is trophotropic is not true it is not pyrotechnic.; sent26 -> int13: there is something such that it leaps con.; int13 & sent6 -> int14: the fact that the saltine leaps dinocerate and/or it is trophotropic is not right.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the saltine is not pyrotechnic.; int11 & int15 -> int16: that the fact that the saltine is not hydrostatic but it is a nautilus hold is false.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it is non-hydrostatic a nautilus is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the gig does not dangle transcendentalist. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gig is a panorama then it does dangle transcendentalist. sent2: the anthology is a putz. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that it is not a da'wah and it does not leap Nuytsia is not false. sent4: something is not a panorama if it is not a kind of a putz and it is not Bruneian. sent5: the gig is not a da'wah. sent6: that the saltine leaps dinocerate and/or is trophotropic is not correct if that there exists something such that it does leap con hold. sent7: something does dangle transcendentalist if that it is not a kind of a putz and is not a panorama is wrong. sent8: something is not a kind of a putz and it is not a Bruneian if it is a relative. sent9: the vamp is a relative if that the undergarment does not dangle ethane and does not predestine portcullis is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a da'wah and it leaps Nuytsia is incorrect. sent11: if the anthology is a da'wah then the bullfinch is a da'wah. sent12: if the anthology is not a panorama then that the gig is not a putz and it is not a panorama is false. sent13: if the turmeric does leap obstruction then the fundraiser is a lever. sent14: the fundraiser is a lever if the turmeric is a kind of a lodgment. sent15: the turmeric is not a Rebel. sent16: the gig is a ramie. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a da'wah and does not leap Nuytsia is right does not hold then the anthology is not a panorama. sent18: that the gig does not dangle transcendentalist hold if that the turmeric is not a Rebel and it does not dangle transcendentalist is incorrect. sent19: if the vamp is not a panorama then the anthology is a da'wah or leaps Nuytsia or both. sent20: that something does not dangle ethane and it does not predestine portcullis is wrong if it is non-apopemptic. sent21: the bullfinch is a da'wah if the anthology leaps Nuytsia. sent22: that something is not hydrostatic but it is a kind of a nautilus does not hold if it is non-pyrotechnic. sent23: the turmeric leaps obstruction and/or it is a kind of a lodgment if it is not a Rebel. sent24: that the bullfinch is not a da'wah and it does not leap Nuytsia is false if that the fundraiser is a lever is not wrong. sent25: if the fact that something either does leap dinocerate or is trophotropic or both does not hold then it is not pyrotechnic. sent26: the corset does leap con. sent27: the fundraiser is not a kind of a lever if that the bullfinch is a da'wah is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent15 -> int1: either the turmeric leaps obstruction or it is a lodgment or both.; int1 & sent13 & sent14 -> int2: the fundraiser is a lever.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the fact that the bullfinch is not a da'wah and does not leap Nuytsia does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a da'wah and does not leap Nuytsia does not hold.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the anthology is not a panorama.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that the gig is both not a putz and not a panorama is wrong.; sent7 -> int7: if the fact that the gig is not a kind of a putz and it is not a panorama is false it does dangle transcendentalist.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__