the assassin is anaclinal.
sent1: that the assassin is anaclinal and is not a viscera is not right. sent2: if the fact that that something does not pole Suriname and it does not torture heater hold is incorrect it is not anaclinal. sent3: that the funambulist poles disrepair and it does pole Suriname is not true. sent4: if the heater is a viscera then the fact that the assassin does not pole Suriname and it does not torture heater is false. sent5: the funambulist is not a kind of a Westminster if there exists something such that it does not pole Suriname and it does torture heater. sent6: something that is a kind of a Westminster is a viscera. sent7: the heater does not pole Suriname and tortures heater if the sweetmeat does not mean Stizolobium. sent8: something does not nobble if it is unprovocative. sent9: the heater is a Westminster if the fact that the funambulist does torture software and does not pole disrepair is not right. sent10: that the heater is not a Westminster but it does torture heater is not true. sent11: the fact that that the funambulist does torture software and does not pole disrepair is wrong hold. sent12: that the shredder is a kind of a cyberpunk but it is not a lygaeid does not hold.
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the heater is a Westminster.; sent6 -> int2: if the heater is a Westminster it is a viscera.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the heater is a viscera.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the assassin does not pole Suriname and it does not torture heater does not hold is correct.; sent2 -> int5: the assassin is not anaclinal if the fact that it does not pole Suriname and it does not torture heater does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the assassin is anaclinal.
sent12 -> int6: there is something such that that it is a cyberpunk and it is not a lygaeid does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the assassin is anaclinal. ; $context$ = sent1: that the assassin is anaclinal and is not a viscera is not right. sent2: if the fact that that something does not pole Suriname and it does not torture heater hold is incorrect it is not anaclinal. sent3: that the funambulist poles disrepair and it does pole Suriname is not true. sent4: if the heater is a viscera then the fact that the assassin does not pole Suriname and it does not torture heater is false. sent5: the funambulist is not a kind of a Westminster if there exists something such that it does not pole Suriname and it does torture heater. sent6: something that is a kind of a Westminster is a viscera. sent7: the heater does not pole Suriname and tortures heater if the sweetmeat does not mean Stizolobium. sent8: something does not nobble if it is unprovocative. sent9: the heater is a Westminster if the fact that the funambulist does torture software and does not pole disrepair is not right. sent10: that the heater is not a Westminster but it does torture heater is not true. sent11: the fact that that the funambulist does torture software and does not pole disrepair is wrong hold. sent12: that the shredder is a kind of a cyberpunk but it is not a lygaeid does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the heater is a Westminster.; sent6 -> int2: if the heater is a Westminster it is a viscera.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the heater is a viscera.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the assassin does not pole Suriname and it does not torture heater does not hold is correct.; sent2 -> int5: the assassin is not anaclinal if the fact that it does not pole Suriname and it does not torture heater does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__