the lagoon is not nidifugous.
sent1: that the jammer is both not a quaver and not uncooperative is not right. sent2: if that the jammer is not a platter and it is not a kind of a phalanger is not right then it is not a kind of a pastime. sent3: there exists nothing such that it is syncarpous and it is a arsenical. sent4: the jammer is not syncarpous if the spar is not a platter. sent5: the spoiler is not a paste and not nidifugous. sent6: if that the autopilot is comfortable and it is a kind of a phalanger is false the jammer is not a kind of a arsenical. sent7: that the autopilot is both not an aircrew and not a platter does not hold. sent8: if that the spar is syncarpous and it is a kind of a arsenical does not hold the jammer is not a kind of a platter. sent9: the kitten is not baroque. sent10: if the spar is not uncooperative it is not syncarpous. sent11: if the fact that the kitten beholds and it is uncooperative is false then the jammer is not a phalanger. sent12: the spar is non-baroque thing that is arsenical. sent13: if something is not comfortable then it is not a pastime. sent14: if the proprionamide is not a baroque then the kitten is not a copyhold and beholds. sent15: that the fact that the proprionamide is not comfortable but a baroque does not hold hold. sent16: if the fact that the spar is not syncarpous and is not uncooperative is false it does not quaver. sent17: if the autopilot is a phalanger or is an aircrew or both then the proprionamide is not a kind of a baroque. sent18: the flytrap does not behold. sent19: the kitten is not a platter if the spar is a arsenical and/or it does behold. sent20: if that the jammer is not a quaver and is not uncooperative is false it is not comfortable. sent21: the fact that the autopilot is not a phalanger is incorrect if the jammer is not a kind of a platter and is not a pastime. sent22: the Gallus is a kind of an aircrew. sent23: the lagoon is not nidifugous if the kitten is not a kind of a copyhold but it beholds. sent24: the handmaid is non-nidifugous thing that is not a kind of a Stendhal.
sent3 -> int1: that the spar is syncarpous and it is a arsenical is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the jammer is not a platter.; sent13 -> int3: if the jammer is not comfortable then that it is not a kind of a pastime hold.; sent20 & sent1 -> int4: the jammer is not comfortable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the jammer is not a pastime hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the jammer is not a kind of a platter and is not a pastime.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the autopilot is a phalanger.; int7 -> int8: the autopilot is a phalanger and/or is a kind of an aircrew.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the proprionamide is not a baroque.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: the kitten is not a copyhold but it beholds.; int10 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the lagoon is not nidifugous. ; $context$ = sent1: that the jammer is both not a quaver and not uncooperative is not right. sent2: if that the jammer is not a platter and it is not a kind of a phalanger is not right then it is not a kind of a pastime. sent3: there exists nothing such that it is syncarpous and it is a arsenical. sent4: the jammer is not syncarpous if the spar is not a platter. sent5: the spoiler is not a paste and not nidifugous. sent6: if that the autopilot is comfortable and it is a kind of a phalanger is false the jammer is not a kind of a arsenical. sent7: that the autopilot is both not an aircrew and not a platter does not hold. sent8: if that the spar is syncarpous and it is a kind of a arsenical does not hold the jammer is not a kind of a platter. sent9: the kitten is not baroque. sent10: if the spar is not uncooperative it is not syncarpous. sent11: if the fact that the kitten beholds and it is uncooperative is false then the jammer is not a phalanger. sent12: the spar is non-baroque thing that is arsenical. sent13: if something is not comfortable then it is not a pastime. sent14: if the proprionamide is not a baroque then the kitten is not a copyhold and beholds. sent15: that the fact that the proprionamide is not comfortable but a baroque does not hold hold. sent16: if the fact that the spar is not syncarpous and is not uncooperative is false it does not quaver. sent17: if the autopilot is a phalanger or is an aircrew or both then the proprionamide is not a kind of a baroque. sent18: the flytrap does not behold. sent19: the kitten is not a platter if the spar is a arsenical and/or it does behold. sent20: if that the jammer is not a quaver and is not uncooperative is false it is not comfortable. sent21: the fact that the autopilot is not a phalanger is incorrect if the jammer is not a kind of a platter and is not a pastime. sent22: the Gallus is a kind of an aircrew. sent23: the lagoon is not nidifugous if the kitten is not a kind of a copyhold but it beholds. sent24: the handmaid is non-nidifugous thing that is not a kind of a Stendhal. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that the spar is syncarpous and it is a arsenical is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the jammer is not a platter.; sent13 -> int3: if the jammer is not comfortable then that it is not a kind of a pastime hold.; sent20 & sent1 -> int4: the jammer is not comfortable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the jammer is not a pastime hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the jammer is not a kind of a platter and is not a pastime.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the autopilot is a phalanger.; int7 -> int8: the autopilot is a phalanger and/or is a kind of an aircrew.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the proprionamide is not a baroque.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: the kitten is not a copyhold but it beholds.; int10 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__