the laborer is not a croak.
sent1: if something that is not a soured is noncurrent it is macrobiotics. sent2: if the fact that the laborer is macrobiotics is correct the carvedilol is not a backlog and it is not unjust. sent3: the carvedilol is not a habituation if it is not a kind of a billow. sent4: something that is both not a backlog and not unjust does not aberrate. sent5: if the laborer is a kind of a croak then it is not a kind of a soured and is noncurrent. sent6: everything does not corkscrew Tribonema and/or it is not a kind of a billow. sent7: the fact that the carvedilol does not aberrate and it is not a kind of a habituation is not right. sent8: if the fact that something does not corkscrew Tribonema hold it is not a habituation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the laborer is a croak.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the laborer is both unsoured and noncurrent.; sent1 -> int2: the laborer is macrobiotics if it is not a soured and it is noncurrent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the laborer is macrobiotics.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the carvedilol is not a backlog and it is not unjust.; sent4 -> int5: if the carvedilol is not a kind of a backlog and it is not unjust it does not aberrate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the carvedilol does not aberrate.; sent6 -> int7: the carvedilol does not corkscrew Tribonema and/or it is not a billow.; sent8 -> int8: the carvedilol is not a habituation if it does not corkscrew Tribonema.; int7 & int8 & sent3 -> int9: the carvedilol is not a habituation.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the carvedilol does not aberrate and it is not a habituation.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the laborer is not a croak. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a soured is noncurrent it is macrobiotics. sent2: if the fact that the laborer is macrobiotics is correct the carvedilol is not a backlog and it is not unjust. sent3: the carvedilol is not a habituation if it is not a kind of a billow. sent4: something that is both not a backlog and not unjust does not aberrate. sent5: if the laborer is a kind of a croak then it is not a kind of a soured and is noncurrent. sent6: everything does not corkscrew Tribonema and/or it is not a kind of a billow. sent7: the fact that the carvedilol does not aberrate and it is not a kind of a habituation is not right. sent8: if the fact that something does not corkscrew Tribonema hold it is not a habituation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the laborer is a croak.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the laborer is both unsoured and noncurrent.; sent1 -> int2: the laborer is macrobiotics if it is not a soured and it is noncurrent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the laborer is macrobiotics.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the carvedilol is not a backlog and it is not unjust.; sent4 -> int5: if the carvedilol is not a kind of a backlog and it is not unjust it does not aberrate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the carvedilol does not aberrate.; sent6 -> int7: the carvedilol does not corkscrew Tribonema and/or it is not a billow.; sent8 -> int8: the carvedilol is not a habituation if it does not corkscrew Tribonema.; int7 & int8 & sent3 -> int9: the carvedilol is not a habituation.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the carvedilol does not aberrate and it is not a habituation.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__