if the whistling syllable happens then the prolixness happens.
sent1: the higherness happens if the vesper does not occur. sent2: the scrotalness happens. sent3: the tort does not occur. sent4: either the vesper occurs or the whistling splitter occurs or both. sent5: if the fact that either the vesper does not occur or the whistling splitter occurs or both is not correct then the fact that the whistling syllable happens hold. sent6: that the trample does not occur brings about the Frostianness. sent7: the whistling syllable does not occur if the fact that the vesper does not occur and/or the whistling splitter happens is not correct. sent8: either that the vesper does not occur or that the whistling splitter happens or both brings about the higherness. sent9: if the higherness happens then the prolixness occurs. sent10: if the Hadith occurs then the inferior occurs. sent11: if the moralizing does not occur or the laicizing occurs or both then the ornithologicalness happens. sent12: the vesper occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that either the vesper does not occur or the whistling splitter occurs or both is not true.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the whistling syllable does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whistling syllable occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: either the vesper does not occur or the whistling splitter happens or both.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the higherness occurs.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the prolixness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the whistling syllable happens then the prolixness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the higherness happens if the vesper does not occur. sent2: the scrotalness happens. sent3: the tort does not occur. sent4: either the vesper occurs or the whistling splitter occurs or both. sent5: if the fact that either the vesper does not occur or the whistling splitter occurs or both is not correct then the fact that the whistling syllable happens hold. sent6: that the trample does not occur brings about the Frostianness. sent7: the whistling syllable does not occur if the fact that the vesper does not occur and/or the whistling splitter happens is not correct. sent8: either that the vesper does not occur or that the whistling splitter happens or both brings about the higherness. sent9: if the higherness happens then the prolixness occurs. sent10: if the Hadith occurs then the inferior occurs. sent11: if the moralizing does not occur or the laicizing occurs or both then the ornithologicalness happens. sent12: the vesper occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that either the vesper does not occur or the whistling splitter occurs or both is not true.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the whistling syllable does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whistling syllable occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: either the vesper does not occur or the whistling splitter happens or both.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the higherness occurs.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the prolixness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__