the Lamaist is either not astigmatic or not an affined or both.
sent1: something is foreign. sent2: if that something does not remember but it reinforces snailfish is not right then that it does not homologize hold. sent3: the fact that something either is not astigmatic or is non-affined or both is wrong if it hymns. sent4: if the joggle is not astigmatic then the Lamaist is not a hymn or not carpellary or both. sent5: if something does not homologize that it is an affined that does not reinforce Brosmius does not hold. sent6: something reinforces Brosmius but it does not homologize if it does not reinforce snailfish. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is an affined and it does not reinforce Brosmius is incorrect the astringent is not an affined. sent8: the fact that the oxbow does not remember but it does reinforce snailfish does not hold. sent9: the Lamaist is not a kind of a hymn. sent10: something is a kind of a hymn if it reinforces Brosmius.
the Lamaist is not a kind of a hymn or is non-carpellary or both.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the oxbow is affined but it does not reinforce Brosmius is wrong if it does not homologize.; sent2 -> int2: if the fact that the oxbow does not remember and does reinforce snailfish is not correct then the fact that it does not homologize is right.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the oxbow does not homologize.; int1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the oxbow is an affined but it does not reinforce Brosmius is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of an affined and it does not reinforce Brosmius does not hold.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the astringent is not affined.; int6 -> int7: there are non-affined things.;
$hypothesis$ = the Lamaist is either not astigmatic or not an affined or both. ; $context$ = sent1: something is foreign. sent2: if that something does not remember but it reinforces snailfish is not right then that it does not homologize hold. sent3: the fact that something either is not astigmatic or is non-affined or both is wrong if it hymns. sent4: if the joggle is not astigmatic then the Lamaist is not a hymn or not carpellary or both. sent5: if something does not homologize that it is an affined that does not reinforce Brosmius does not hold. sent6: something reinforces Brosmius but it does not homologize if it does not reinforce snailfish. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is an affined and it does not reinforce Brosmius is incorrect the astringent is not an affined. sent8: the fact that the oxbow does not remember but it does reinforce snailfish does not hold. sent9: the Lamaist is not a kind of a hymn. sent10: something is a kind of a hymn if it reinforces Brosmius. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__