the constituting does not occur.
sent1: the land does not occur if the fact that the Leviticalness but not the fattism happens does not hold. sent2: the fact that the fact that the brachiation but not the Ascension occurs does not hold if the perfidy does not occur is not false. sent3: the amnioticness does not occur if the fact that both the Romanceness and the empyreanness happens hold. sent4: the revenging countersuit does not occur. sent5: the fact that the stooging but not the absentness occurs does not hold if the fact that the howling does not occur hold. sent6: the Sudanese does not occur. sent7: the constituting does not occur if the howling and the heedlessness happens. sent8: the striating happens. sent9: the striating brings about that the complimentariness and the non-Sudaneseness happens. sent10: the March does not occur and the heedlessness occurs. sent11: that the emblazoning Casmerodius and the non-microelectronicsness happens is incorrect if the culdoscopy does not occur. sent12: that the Romance and the capacity happens triggers that the settling zoolatry does not occur. sent13: the logogrammaticness occurs. sent14: the fact that both the complimentariness and the non-Sudaneseness happens is incorrect if the counterfire does not occur. sent15: if the fact that that the stooging and the non-absentness occurs is false hold the counterfire does not occur. sent16: not the settling compound but the emblazoning broil occurs. sent17: the fact that both the congenericness and the non-acidicness happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the howl does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that that the stooging but not the absentness happens is true is wrong.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the counterfire does not occur.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: that the complimentariness occurs but the Sudanese does not occur is false.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: the complimentariness but not the Sudanese occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the howling occurs.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the heedlessness occurs is right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the howling occurs and the heedlessness happens.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the constituting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the land does not occur if the fact that the Leviticalness but not the fattism happens does not hold. sent2: the fact that the fact that the brachiation but not the Ascension occurs does not hold if the perfidy does not occur is not false. sent3: the amnioticness does not occur if the fact that both the Romanceness and the empyreanness happens hold. sent4: the revenging countersuit does not occur. sent5: the fact that the stooging but not the absentness occurs does not hold if the fact that the howling does not occur hold. sent6: the Sudanese does not occur. sent7: the constituting does not occur if the howling and the heedlessness happens. sent8: the striating happens. sent9: the striating brings about that the complimentariness and the non-Sudaneseness happens. sent10: the March does not occur and the heedlessness occurs. sent11: that the emblazoning Casmerodius and the non-microelectronicsness happens is incorrect if the culdoscopy does not occur. sent12: that the Romance and the capacity happens triggers that the settling zoolatry does not occur. sent13: the logogrammaticness occurs. sent14: the fact that both the complimentariness and the non-Sudaneseness happens is incorrect if the counterfire does not occur. sent15: if the fact that that the stooging and the non-absentness occurs is false hold the counterfire does not occur. sent16: not the settling compound but the emblazoning broil occurs. sent17: the fact that both the congenericness and the non-acidicness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the howl does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that that the stooging but not the absentness happens is true is wrong.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the counterfire does not occur.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: that the complimentariness occurs but the Sudanese does not occur is false.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: the complimentariness but not the Sudanese occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the howling occurs.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the heedlessness occurs is right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the howling occurs and the heedlessness happens.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__