that if the federalizing sugarcane does not occur then the fact that not the environmentalness but the subtracting Zaglossus happens is correct hold.
sent1: if the encircling countercheck does not occur and the focalness happens the fact that the snowing buffalo happens is right. sent2: the nonfatness does not occur if the encircling wrecked happens. sent3: the encircling wrecked occurs. sent4: that the federalizing sugarcane occurs yields that the non-environmentalness and the subtracting Zaglossus happens. sent5: if the snowing thermography does not occur the environmentalness does not occur. sent6: the surveying occurs. sent7: the Chinook happens. sent8: the fact that the snowing thermography does not occur is correct if the pinball and the snowing buffalo happens. sent9: the federalizing sugarcane happens if the fact that not the encircling countercheck but the focalness happens is wrong. sent10: that both the propulsiveness and the snowing Elamitic occurs is true. sent11: that the armlessness does not occur and the telefilm does not occur is triggered by the floodhead. sent12: the immoderateness occurs. sent13: the non-vertebralness and the politicalness occurs. sent14: the pinball and the immoderateness occurs. sent15: the fact that the snowing ignorantness occurs hold. sent16: the nonfatness does not occur. sent17: the telefilm does not occur. sent18: the subtracting Zaglossus occurs and the Chinook happens if the fact that the geriatricsness does not occur is true. sent19: if the focalness does not occur the federalizing sugarcane occurs. sent20: the realizing does not occur. sent21: if the suppression does not occur the March occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that not the encircling countercheck but the focalness happens is not correct.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the federalizing sugarcane happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the federalizing sugarcane does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the encircling countercheck does not occur and the focalness happens is not false.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the snowing buffalo happens.; sent14 -> int5: the pinball happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the pinball and the snowing buffalo happens.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the snowing thermography does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the environmentalness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the federalizing sugarcane does not occur then the fact that not the environmentalness but the subtracting Zaglossus happens is correct hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the encircling countercheck does not occur and the focalness happens the fact that the snowing buffalo happens is right. sent2: the nonfatness does not occur if the encircling wrecked happens. sent3: the encircling wrecked occurs. sent4: that the federalizing sugarcane occurs yields that the non-environmentalness and the subtracting Zaglossus happens. sent5: if the snowing thermography does not occur the environmentalness does not occur. sent6: the surveying occurs. sent7: the Chinook happens. sent8: the fact that the snowing thermography does not occur is correct if the pinball and the snowing buffalo happens. sent9: the federalizing sugarcane happens if the fact that not the encircling countercheck but the focalness happens is wrong. sent10: that both the propulsiveness and the snowing Elamitic occurs is true. sent11: that the armlessness does not occur and the telefilm does not occur is triggered by the floodhead. sent12: the immoderateness occurs. sent13: the non-vertebralness and the politicalness occurs. sent14: the pinball and the immoderateness occurs. sent15: the fact that the snowing ignorantness occurs hold. sent16: the nonfatness does not occur. sent17: the telefilm does not occur. sent18: the subtracting Zaglossus occurs and the Chinook happens if the fact that the geriatricsness does not occur is true. sent19: if the focalness does not occur the federalizing sugarcane occurs. sent20: the realizing does not occur. sent21: if the suppression does not occur the March occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that not the encircling countercheck but the focalness happens is not correct.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the federalizing sugarcane happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the federalizing sugarcane does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the encircling countercheck does not occur and the focalness happens is not false.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the snowing buffalo happens.; sent14 -> int5: the pinball happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the pinball and the snowing buffalo happens.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the snowing thermography does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the environmentalness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__