that the captor does not camber coho is not false.
sent1: something is not a Tanga. sent2: the captor is non-econometric if there exists something such that it is not a Tanga. sent3: that the fact that the captor is not a kind of a Jagger and does truck Lemmus is not wrong is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a dentition and does not stabilize. sent5: something is a Tanga. sent6: the stonecrop is a SC but not coastal if the frontlet is a weatherboard. sent7: if the fact that the captor is not a kind of a Jagger and trucks Lemmus is false then it is lenten. sent8: if a non-econometric thing is lenten then it does not camber coho. sent9: if something that is not econometric is not lenten it cambers coho.
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the captor is lenten.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the captor is not econometric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the captor is not econometric and is lenten.; sent8 -> int4: the fact that if the captor is non-econometric but it is lenten the fact that the captor does not camber coho hold is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the captor does camber coho.
sent9 -> int5: the captor cambers coho if it is a kind of non-econometric thing that is not lenten.;
$hypothesis$ = that the captor does not camber coho is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a Tanga. sent2: the captor is non-econometric if there exists something such that it is not a Tanga. sent3: that the fact that the captor is not a kind of a Jagger and does truck Lemmus is not wrong is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a dentition and does not stabilize. sent5: something is a Tanga. sent6: the stonecrop is a SC but not coastal if the frontlet is a weatherboard. sent7: if the fact that the captor is not a kind of a Jagger and trucks Lemmus is false then it is lenten. sent8: if a non-econometric thing is lenten then it does not camber coho. sent9: if something that is not econometric is not lenten it cambers coho. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the captor is lenten.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the captor is not econometric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the captor is not econometric and is lenten.; sent8 -> int4: the fact that if the captor is non-econometric but it is lenten the fact that the captor does not camber coho hold is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__