that there is something such that if it is not a topee and it impersonates fusion then that it is not inadvisable is not wrong is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a pilferer and it is a kind of a Roanoke then it is not apophyseal. sent2: if a non-biauricular thing is aeriferous then it does not spiel godliness. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-involucrate and oviparous it is not a lowland. sent4: if the snakewood is a kind of a topee and it impersonates fusion it is advisable. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a diatomite and it does constellate it does not bubble snakewood. sent6: if the snakewood does not impersonate fusion and is fatal then it is not a absinth. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a usurper and does disintegrate then it is not bionics. sent8: the snakewood is inadvisable if the fact that it is not a topee and it impersonates fusion is true. sent9: if the snakewood is not fatal and cocks then it is not inadvisable. sent10: the flurbiprofen does not unwrap motto if it does not spiel dankness and it is a topee. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a topee and it does impersonate fusion then it is inadvisable. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a topee and it does impersonate fusion it is not inadvisable. sent13: the snakewood is not inadvisable if it is not a topee and it impersonates fusion. sent14: if the snakewood is not a topee but it unwraps enchantress it does not unwrap soup-strainer.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is both not biauricular and not non-aeriferous it does not spiel godliness.
sent2 -> int1: that if the ayah is both non-biauricular and aeriferous the ayah does not spiel godliness is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a topee and it impersonates fusion then that it is not inadvisable is not wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a pilferer and it is a kind of a Roanoke then it is not apophyseal. sent2: if a non-biauricular thing is aeriferous then it does not spiel godliness. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-involucrate and oviparous it is not a lowland. sent4: if the snakewood is a kind of a topee and it impersonates fusion it is advisable. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a diatomite and it does constellate it does not bubble snakewood. sent6: if the snakewood does not impersonate fusion and is fatal then it is not a absinth. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a usurper and does disintegrate then it is not bionics. sent8: the snakewood is inadvisable if the fact that it is not a topee and it impersonates fusion is true. sent9: if the snakewood is not fatal and cocks then it is not inadvisable. sent10: the flurbiprofen does not unwrap motto if it does not spiel dankness and it is a topee. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a topee and it does impersonate fusion then it is inadvisable. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a topee and it does impersonate fusion it is not inadvisable. sent13: the snakewood is not inadvisable if it is not a topee and it impersonates fusion. sent14: if the snakewood is not a topee but it unwraps enchantress it does not unwrap soup-strainer. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__