there is something such that if it does decoy Zeno that it is a kind of non-neuroendocrine thing that is adactylous is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is anisotropic the fact that it is not a Zoroastrian and does foal veracity is incorrect. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a arsenopyrite the fact that it does decoy cataphract and does fare does not hold is true. sent3: that the plat is not futuristic but it is an honorarium is incorrect if it does decoy Zeno. sent4: that the plat is non-neuroendocrine thing that is adactylous does not hold if it decoys Zeno. sent5: the fact that the caviar is not non-cryptobiotic and is adamantine does not hold if it decoys Zeno. sent6: the fact that something is not a blacking but it is a Epictetus is wrong if it is adactylous. sent7: there is something such that if it is exclusive then the fact that it is not a Hitchcock but meritocratic is false. sent8: if the fact that the plat does bask is not wrong then the fact that it does decoy Zeno and it is a shoddiness is wrong. sent9: if the plat decoys Zeno then it is non-neuroendocrine and adactylous. sent10: if the herbicide is anisotropic that it is a Ictonyx and a tenderization does not hold. sent11: if the plat is immediate then that it is not a arsenopyrite and decoys Zeno is not false.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the cataphract is both non-blacking and a Epictetus does not hold if it is adactylous.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does decoy Zeno that it is a kind of non-neuroendocrine thing that is adactylous is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is anisotropic the fact that it is not a Zoroastrian and does foal veracity is incorrect. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a arsenopyrite the fact that it does decoy cataphract and does fare does not hold is true. sent3: that the plat is not futuristic but it is an honorarium is incorrect if it does decoy Zeno. sent4: that the plat is non-neuroendocrine thing that is adactylous does not hold if it decoys Zeno. sent5: the fact that the caviar is not non-cryptobiotic and is adamantine does not hold if it decoys Zeno. sent6: the fact that something is not a blacking but it is a Epictetus is wrong if it is adactylous. sent7: there is something such that if it is exclusive then the fact that it is not a Hitchcock but meritocratic is false. sent8: if the fact that the plat does bask is not wrong then the fact that it does decoy Zeno and it is a shoddiness is wrong. sent9: if the plat decoys Zeno then it is non-neuroendocrine and adactylous. sent10: if the herbicide is anisotropic that it is a Ictonyx and a tenderization does not hold. sent11: if the plat is immediate then that it is not a arsenopyrite and decoys Zeno is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__