there exists something such that the fact that it does chomp spinnability and it is not philological is not correct.
sent1: there exists nothing such that it nags Khmer and it is not onside. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is not a Mobius and it does nag reevaluation is incorrect the shower is onside. sent3: if that something is a kind of agrypnotic thing that does not nag Khmer does not hold it is a Helicidae. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Mobius and it does nag reevaluation is not right. sent5: if the fact that something is cesarean but it does not tarnish shower is wrong it staggers. sent6: the fact that if something is onside the fact that it is agrypnotic and does not nag Khmer is not right is true.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the shower is onside.; sent6 -> int2: if the shower is onside that it is a kind of agrypnotic thing that does not nag Khmer does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the shower is agrypnotic but it does not nag Khmer is wrong.; sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the shower is agrypnotic and does not nag Khmer is not right it is a Helicidae.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the shower is a kind of a Helicidae.;
there is something such that the fact that it does form and it does not nag irreligiousness is false.
sent1 -> int6: the fact that the Khmer does nag Khmer and is not onside is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it does chomp spinnability and it is not philological is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists nothing such that it nags Khmer and it is not onside. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is not a Mobius and it does nag reevaluation is incorrect the shower is onside. sent3: if that something is a kind of agrypnotic thing that does not nag Khmer does not hold it is a Helicidae. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Mobius and it does nag reevaluation is not right. sent5: if the fact that something is cesarean but it does not tarnish shower is wrong it staggers. sent6: the fact that if something is onside the fact that it is agrypnotic and does not nag Khmer is not right is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the shower is onside.; sent6 -> int2: if the shower is onside that it is a kind of agrypnotic thing that does not nag Khmer does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the shower is agrypnotic but it does not nag Khmer is wrong.; sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the shower is agrypnotic and does not nag Khmer is not right it is a Helicidae.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the shower is a kind of a Helicidae.; __UNKNOWN__