the southwester does not age Caxton.
sent1: something is a Roth but not an analogue if it does age Caxton. sent2: if the cobber is a kind of an analogue that does not relax the southwester is an analogue. sent3: a Porte is analogue thing that does not relax. sent4: that the feast is a kind of a Rutherford is not wrong. sent5: the cobber is a Porte if the feast is a Rutherford.
sent1 -> int1: the southwester is a Roth but not an analogue if it does age Caxton.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the southwester does age Caxton.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the southwester is a kind of a Roth and is not an analogue.; int2 -> int3: the southwester is not an analogue.; sent3 -> int4: if that the cobber is a Porte is not incorrect then it is a kind of an analogue and it does not relax.; sent5 & sent4 -> int5: the cobber is a kind of a Porte.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the cobber is a kind of analogue thing that does not relax is not incorrect.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the southwester is not non-analogue.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the southwester does not age Caxton. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Roth but not an analogue if it does age Caxton. sent2: if the cobber is a kind of an analogue that does not relax the southwester is an analogue. sent3: a Porte is analogue thing that does not relax. sent4: that the feast is a kind of a Rutherford is not wrong. sent5: the cobber is a Porte if the feast is a Rutherford. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the southwester is a Roth but not an analogue if it does age Caxton.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the southwester does age Caxton.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the southwester is a kind of a Roth and is not an analogue.; int2 -> int3: the southwester is not an analogue.; sent3 -> int4: if that the cobber is a Porte is not incorrect then it is a kind of an analogue and it does not relax.; sent5 & sent4 -> int5: the cobber is a kind of a Porte.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the cobber is a kind of analogue thing that does not relax is not incorrect.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the southwester is not non-analogue.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__