the fact that the congou is not diocesan and/or it does not erase equerry is not correct.
sent1: something is a Ireland that does edge dalesman if it does not edge voltmeter. sent2: if something does not edge voltmeter then the fact that it is a kind of a Ireland hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the congou is a kind of the Ireland is not false if the congou does not edge voltmeter is not false. sent4: the congou does not edge dalesman if the goad is not unexcitable and it is not neritic. sent5: if the goad is not azo then it is not unexcitable and it is not neritic. sent6: if the fact that the congou is not a diocesan and/or does not erase equerry is false that it does not edge voltmeter is not wrong. sent7: the goad is both not a Ireland and not a diocesan if it is not unexcitable. sent8: that the congou is diocesan hold. sent9: the goad is not azo. sent10: the goad is not unexcitable. sent11: something that is not an immobility does blackmail Lindbergh and does edge dalesman. sent12: if the goad is not azo it is not unexcitable. sent13: that that the congou is not diocesan and/or does not erase equerry is incorrect is not incorrect if the goad does not edge dalesman.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the congou is not a diocesan or does not erase equerry or both does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the congou does not edge voltmeter.; sent1 -> int2: if the congou does not edge voltmeter it is a kind of a Ireland that does edge dalesman.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the congou is a kind of a Ireland and edges dalesman.; int3 -> int4: the congou edges dalesman.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the goad is not unexcitable and is not neritic.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the congou does not edge dalesman.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
if the BIN is not a kind of an immobility that it blackmails Lindbergh and does edge dalesman is correct.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the congou is not diocesan and/or it does not erase equerry is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Ireland that does edge dalesman if it does not edge voltmeter. sent2: if something does not edge voltmeter then the fact that it is a kind of a Ireland hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the congou is a kind of the Ireland is not false if the congou does not edge voltmeter is not false. sent4: the congou does not edge dalesman if the goad is not unexcitable and it is not neritic. sent5: if the goad is not azo then it is not unexcitable and it is not neritic. sent6: if the fact that the congou is not a diocesan and/or does not erase equerry is false that it does not edge voltmeter is not wrong. sent7: the goad is both not a Ireland and not a diocesan if it is not unexcitable. sent8: that the congou is diocesan hold. sent9: the goad is not azo. sent10: the goad is not unexcitable. sent11: something that is not an immobility does blackmail Lindbergh and does edge dalesman. sent12: if the goad is not azo it is not unexcitable. sent13: that that the congou is not diocesan and/or does not erase equerry is incorrect is not incorrect if the goad does not edge dalesman. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the congou is not a diocesan or does not erase equerry or both does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the congou does not edge voltmeter.; sent1 -> int2: if the congou does not edge voltmeter it is a kind of a Ireland that does edge dalesman.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the congou is a kind of a Ireland and edges dalesman.; int3 -> int4: the congou edges dalesman.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the goad is not unexcitable and is not neritic.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the congou does not edge dalesman.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__