the digitalization does not occur.
sent1: that the myopathicness but not the molestation happens is not true if the intralinguisticness does not occur. sent2: that the duckpins happens or the unacceptableness or both triggers the non-anorectalness. sent3: if that either the unacceptableness or the anorectalness or both happens does not hold then the duckpins does not occur. sent4: the changelessness does not occur if the fact that the myopathicness happens but the molestation does not occur is not true. sent5: that the repoting Baruch occurs and the forgetfulness happens is caused by the non-incompleteness. sent6: if the ruminant happens then the completeness and the non-earlierness occurs. sent7: the tonalness and the setup happens. sent8: if the fact that the non-unacceptableness and the adjudicativeness happens does not hold the adjudicativeness does not occur. sent9: the repoting Baruch occurs and the anorectalness happens. sent10: if that the fact that the liquidation does not occur and the wetting does not occur is wrong is true then the ruminant happens. sent11: if the leaning zapper does not occur that not the Gula but the unrenewableness occurs is incorrect. sent12: if the repoting tagger happens then that the liquidation does not occur and the wetting does not occur is incorrect. sent13: that the myopathicness happens is prevented by the acceptableness and/or the changelessness. sent14: if the fact that the intralinguisticness does not occur but the molestation happens is false then the forgetfulness does not occur. sent15: if the forgetfulness does not occur then the digitalization happens. sent16: the intralinguisticness does not occur if either the repoting Baruch or the intralinguisticnessness or both occurs. sent17: that not the intralinguisticness but the molestation happens is not right if the myopathicness does not occur. sent18: the biochemicalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the unacceptableness happens is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: the duckpins or the unacceptableness or both happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the anorectalness does not occur.; sent9 -> int3: the anorectalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the unacceptableness does not occur hold.; int5 -> int6: either the non-unacceptableness or the changelessness or both occurs.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the myopathicness does not occur.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the fact that the intralinguisticness does not occur but the molestation happens is false.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the forgetfulness does not occur.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the adjudicativeness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the digitalization does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the myopathicness but not the molestation happens is not true if the intralinguisticness does not occur. sent2: that the duckpins happens or the unacceptableness or both triggers the non-anorectalness. sent3: if that either the unacceptableness or the anorectalness or both happens does not hold then the duckpins does not occur. sent4: the changelessness does not occur if the fact that the myopathicness happens but the molestation does not occur is not true. sent5: that the repoting Baruch occurs and the forgetfulness happens is caused by the non-incompleteness. sent6: if the ruminant happens then the completeness and the non-earlierness occurs. sent7: the tonalness and the setup happens. sent8: if the fact that the non-unacceptableness and the adjudicativeness happens does not hold the adjudicativeness does not occur. sent9: the repoting Baruch occurs and the anorectalness happens. sent10: if that the fact that the liquidation does not occur and the wetting does not occur is wrong is true then the ruminant happens. sent11: if the leaning zapper does not occur that not the Gula but the unrenewableness occurs is incorrect. sent12: if the repoting tagger happens then that the liquidation does not occur and the wetting does not occur is incorrect. sent13: that the myopathicness happens is prevented by the acceptableness and/or the changelessness. sent14: if the fact that the intralinguisticness does not occur but the molestation happens is false then the forgetfulness does not occur. sent15: if the forgetfulness does not occur then the digitalization happens. sent16: the intralinguisticness does not occur if either the repoting Baruch or the intralinguisticnessness or both occurs. sent17: that not the intralinguisticness but the molestation happens is not right if the myopathicness does not occur. sent18: the biochemicalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the unacceptableness happens is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: the duckpins or the unacceptableness or both happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the anorectalness does not occur.; sent9 -> int3: the anorectalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the unacceptableness does not occur hold.; int5 -> int6: either the non-unacceptableness or the changelessness or both occurs.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the myopathicness does not occur.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the fact that the intralinguisticness does not occur but the molestation happens is false.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the forgetfulness does not occur.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__