the fact that if the wryneck is a formal then the fact that the chalet is regenerating but it does not spend phosphor is not true does not hold.
sent1: the chalet either does not regenerate or is Delphic or both if the fact that it is not a Iago hold. sent2: that the chalet is regenerating thing that does spend phosphor is wrong. sent3: something does not bronze and it is not a formal if it regenerates. sent4: if either the chalet is not regenerating or it is Delphic or both then the wryneck is not Delphic. sent5: that the chalet regenerates but it does not spend phosphor is incorrect if the wryneck is not regenerates. sent6: that the wryneck is a kind of a bronze but it is not regenerating is not right if the chalet is a formal. sent7: the fact that the chalet regenerates and does spend phosphor is not correct if the wryneck is a formal. sent8: the tenant does not spend phosphor. sent9: something is not a bronze if it does regenerate. sent10: that the wryneck is a bronze that is not a cytoskeleton is not right. sent11: the wryneck is not a bronze if it regenerates. sent12: the wryneck is not a kind of a bronze but it is formal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wryneck is a formal.; sent3 -> int1: the wryneck does not bronze and is not a formal if it is regenerating.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the wryneck does regenerate is right.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the wryneck is not a bronze and is not a kind of a formal.; int2 -> int3: the wryneck is not a formal.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the wryneck does not regenerate.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the chalet does regenerate but it does not spend phosphor is incorrect.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the wryneck is not Delphic and is not a bronze.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the wryneck is a formal then the fact that the chalet is regenerating but it does not spend phosphor is not true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the chalet either does not regenerate or is Delphic or both if the fact that it is not a Iago hold. sent2: that the chalet is regenerating thing that does spend phosphor is wrong. sent3: something does not bronze and it is not a formal if it regenerates. sent4: if either the chalet is not regenerating or it is Delphic or both then the wryneck is not Delphic. sent5: that the chalet regenerates but it does not spend phosphor is incorrect if the wryneck is not regenerates. sent6: that the wryneck is a kind of a bronze but it is not regenerating is not right if the chalet is a formal. sent7: the fact that the chalet regenerates and does spend phosphor is not correct if the wryneck is a formal. sent8: the tenant does not spend phosphor. sent9: something is not a bronze if it does regenerate. sent10: that the wryneck is a bronze that is not a cytoskeleton is not right. sent11: the wryneck is not a bronze if it regenerates. sent12: the wryneck is not a kind of a bronze but it is formal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wryneck is a formal.; sent3 -> int1: the wryneck does not bronze and is not a formal if it is regenerating.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the wryneck does regenerate is right.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the wryneck is not a bronze and is not a kind of a formal.; int2 -> int3: the wryneck is not a formal.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the wryneck does not regenerate.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the chalet does regenerate but it does not spend phosphor is incorrect.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__