there is something such that if it is maritime then that it does not spoof brutalization and is a kind of a backgammon is not true.
sent1: that the bohrium does not reciprocate Penicillium and does spoof brutalization is not right if it is a surf. sent2: the fact that the chipmunk is not a kind of an inaccessibility but it spoofs brutalization does not hold if it is a kind of an initiate. sent3: the mausoleum is a kind of a decahedron. sent4: if the chipmunk is a kind of undimmed thing that does dandle toetoe it is maritime. sent5: the host is both not a Gregory and logarithmic if it spoofs brutalization. sent6: if something that is estrous is an enamel then it is not an agony. sent7: if something is aneurysmal then that it does not drowse steep and it detonates does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is a burner then the fact that it is not a kind of a flybridge and it is unprotective is false. sent9: that the ice-wagon is not a burner is not false if it does not reciprocate A-list and is Panhellenic. sent10: the chipmunk does not spoof brutalization. sent11: if the chipmunk does not spoof brutalization and is a kind of a B-horizon it does not spoof narrow-bodied. sent12: the chipmunk is not a topicalization. sent13: if the pelvimeter is a Lepismatidae it is non-nonreversible thing that reciprocates exchange.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chipmunk does not spoof brutalization and is a backgammon.;
there exists something such that if it is aneurysmal then that it does not drowse steep and detonates is not correct.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the bohrium does not drowse steep but it detonates does not hold if it is aneurysmal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is maritime then that it does not spoof brutalization and is a kind of a backgammon is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bohrium does not reciprocate Penicillium and does spoof brutalization is not right if it is a surf. sent2: the fact that the chipmunk is not a kind of an inaccessibility but it spoofs brutalization does not hold if it is a kind of an initiate. sent3: the mausoleum is a kind of a decahedron. sent4: if the chipmunk is a kind of undimmed thing that does dandle toetoe it is maritime. sent5: the host is both not a Gregory and logarithmic if it spoofs brutalization. sent6: if something that is estrous is an enamel then it is not an agony. sent7: if something is aneurysmal then that it does not drowse steep and it detonates does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is a burner then the fact that it is not a kind of a flybridge and it is unprotective is false. sent9: that the ice-wagon is not a burner is not false if it does not reciprocate A-list and is Panhellenic. sent10: the chipmunk does not spoof brutalization. sent11: if the chipmunk does not spoof brutalization and is a kind of a B-horizon it does not spoof narrow-bodied. sent12: the chipmunk is not a topicalization. sent13: if the pelvimeter is a Lepismatidae it is non-nonreversible thing that reciprocates exchange. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chipmunk does not spoof brutalization and is a backgammon.; __UNKNOWN__