the fact that the fact that there is something such that it is subtractive and it is a pentoxide is correct is not right.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a electroretinogram and it is reptilian is not true the gammon is a kind of a brocade. sent2: the quaffer is a kind of a first-nighter if there exists something such that the fact that it is not congeneric and it does term quaffer does not hold. sent3: something does not term quaffer but it is stenographic. sent4: the quaffer does stud if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Dutch and is a kind of a threonine does not hold. sent5: the quaffer does stud. sent6: the quaffer is subtractive and studs. sent7: the quaffer does lime wrist. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that that it is ontological is not incorrect is not false. sent9: there is something such that that it is a pentoxide and it is a stud does not hold. sent10: that the fact that the quaffer does not term spillover and is priestly does not hold is not false if the fact that the domicile is not a pentoxide is not wrong. sent11: there exists something such that that it does not term quaffer and it is stenographic is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that it is a stud and it is subtractive. sent13: the dining-hall is stenographic. sent14: if there exists something such that that it does not term quaffer and is stenographic is not correct the quaffer is a pentoxide. sent15: the quaffer is botryoid. sent16: the quaffer is Lancastrian. sent17: the ballpark studs. sent18: the quaffer is stenographic. sent19: if the PWR is not a pentoxide the domicile is not a pentoxide.
sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the quaffer is a pentoxide is true.; sent6 -> int2: that the quaffer is subtractive is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the quaffer is subtractive and it is a pentoxide.; int3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that that it does not term spillover and is priestly does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that there is something such that it is subtractive and it is a pentoxide is correct is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a electroretinogram and it is reptilian is not true the gammon is a kind of a brocade. sent2: the quaffer is a kind of a first-nighter if there exists something such that the fact that it is not congeneric and it does term quaffer does not hold. sent3: something does not term quaffer but it is stenographic. sent4: the quaffer does stud if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Dutch and is a kind of a threonine does not hold. sent5: the quaffer does stud. sent6: the quaffer is subtractive and studs. sent7: the quaffer does lime wrist. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that that it is ontological is not incorrect is not false. sent9: there is something such that that it is a pentoxide and it is a stud does not hold. sent10: that the fact that the quaffer does not term spillover and is priestly does not hold is not false if the fact that the domicile is not a pentoxide is not wrong. sent11: there exists something such that that it does not term quaffer and it is stenographic is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that it is a stud and it is subtractive. sent13: the dining-hall is stenographic. sent14: if there exists something such that that it does not term quaffer and is stenographic is not correct the quaffer is a pentoxide. sent15: the quaffer is botryoid. sent16: the quaffer is Lancastrian. sent17: the ballpark studs. sent18: the quaffer is stenographic. sent19: if the PWR is not a pentoxide the domicile is not a pentoxide. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the quaffer is a pentoxide is true.; sent6 -> int2: that the quaffer is subtractive is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the quaffer is subtractive and it is a pentoxide.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__