there is something such that if it is not monovalent and it does sag readmission it is not vigesimal.
sent1: the alpaca is non-vigesimal if it is monovalent and does sag readmission. sent2: if something that is monovalent sags readmission then it is not vigesimal. sent3: something dictates turquoise if it is not a swineherd and is scenic. sent4: there is something such that if it is not weedless and seeps scyphus the fact that it does dictate alpaca is not incorrect. sent5: if something is not monovalent but it sags readmission then it is not vigesimal. sent6: there is something such that if it is not non-monovalent and sags readmission then it is not vigesimal.
sent5 -> int1: if the alpaca is not monovalent but it sags readmission then it is not vigesimal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not monovalent and it does sag readmission it is not vigesimal. ; $context$ = sent1: the alpaca is non-vigesimal if it is monovalent and does sag readmission. sent2: if something that is monovalent sags readmission then it is not vigesimal. sent3: something dictates turquoise if it is not a swineherd and is scenic. sent4: there is something such that if it is not weedless and seeps scyphus the fact that it does dictate alpaca is not incorrect. sent5: if something is not monovalent but it sags readmission then it is not vigesimal. sent6: there is something such that if it is not non-monovalent and sags readmission then it is not vigesimal. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the alpaca is not monovalent but it sags readmission then it is not vigesimal.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__