the applique is not circadian.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of fisheye thing that is not anamorphic does not hold. sent2: the applique is non-circadian if there exists something such that it fudges channels. sent3: that the triiodothyronine is brisant and it does fudge channels is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that that it is brisant and it fudges channels does not hold. sent5: the applique is circadian if the triiodothyronine is circadian. sent6: the triiodothyronine is circadian and does warm if the fact that the megaspore is not brisant hold. sent7: there are warmed things. sent8: the perfluorocarbon does not warm if the fact that the triiodothyronine is not brisant and does fudge channels does not hold. sent9: the applique is not circadian if there is something such that that it is brisant and it does not fudge channels does not hold. sent10: the fact that the triiodothyronine is circadian but it does not fudge channels is not right. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a Saratov and it is not associative is not correct. sent12: if there is something such that it is brisant then the triiodothyronine is not litigious. sent13: the fact that the triiodothyronine is not circadian is not incorrect if something is brisant. sent14: the fact that the applique does fudge channels and is not circadian is wrong if there are brisant things. sent15: if there exists something such that it does warm the fact that the fact that the triiodothyronine is brisant and it fudges channels is wrong hold. sent16: there exists something such that it is brisant and does not fudge channels. sent17: if there is something such that it is brisant the fact that the fact that the triiodothyronine is circadian but it does not fudge channels is not false does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that it is circadian. sent19: everything does not spot barberry. sent20: if something does not spot barberry that it is not brisant and it fudges channels is not correct. sent21: if there are warmed things then that the triiodothyronine is brisant but it does not fudge channels does not hold.
sent7 & sent21 -> int1: that the triiodothyronine is not non-brisant and does not fudge channels is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is brisant and it does not fudge channels is not right.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the applique is circadian is not incorrect.
sent20 -> int3: if the megaspore does not spot barberry that it is not brisant and fudges channels is wrong.; sent19 -> int4: the megaspore does not spot barberry.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the megaspore is non-brisant thing that does fudge channels is not right.; int5 -> int6: there is nothing that is a kind of non-brisant thing that fudges channels.; int6 -> int7: that the triiodothyronine is not brisant but it fudges channels is false.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not brisant and does fudge channels does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the applique is not circadian. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of fisheye thing that is not anamorphic does not hold. sent2: the applique is non-circadian if there exists something such that it fudges channels. sent3: that the triiodothyronine is brisant and it does fudge channels is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that that it is brisant and it fudges channels does not hold. sent5: the applique is circadian if the triiodothyronine is circadian. sent6: the triiodothyronine is circadian and does warm if the fact that the megaspore is not brisant hold. sent7: there are warmed things. sent8: the perfluorocarbon does not warm if the fact that the triiodothyronine is not brisant and does fudge channels does not hold. sent9: the applique is not circadian if there is something such that that it is brisant and it does not fudge channels does not hold. sent10: the fact that the triiodothyronine is circadian but it does not fudge channels is not right. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a Saratov and it is not associative is not correct. sent12: if there is something such that it is brisant then the triiodothyronine is not litigious. sent13: the fact that the triiodothyronine is not circadian is not incorrect if something is brisant. sent14: the fact that the applique does fudge channels and is not circadian is wrong if there are brisant things. sent15: if there exists something such that it does warm the fact that the fact that the triiodothyronine is brisant and it fudges channels is wrong hold. sent16: there exists something such that it is brisant and does not fudge channels. sent17: if there is something such that it is brisant the fact that the fact that the triiodothyronine is circadian but it does not fudge channels is not false does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that it is circadian. sent19: everything does not spot barberry. sent20: if something does not spot barberry that it is not brisant and it fudges channels is not correct. sent21: if there are warmed things then that the triiodothyronine is brisant but it does not fudge channels does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent21 -> int1: that the triiodothyronine is not non-brisant and does not fudge channels is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is brisant and it does not fudge channels is not right.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__