that the construction does not occur prevents the non-integumentariness.
sent1: the mass-spectrometricness happens. sent2: if the integumentariness does not occur then either the bridge does not occur or the construction does not occur or both. sent3: the Mark happens if the organization does not occur. sent4: the revival happens. sent5: if the mass-spectrometricness does not occur then that the intruding existentialist happens but the comforting kingfisher does not occur does not hold. sent6: the reinforcing obviation occurs. sent7: the bridge brings about that the construction occurs. sent8: the reinforcing madness happens. sent9: the commingling happens. sent10: that the reinforcing obviation does not occur prevents that the basset does not occur. sent11: the intruding existentialist occurs if the reinforcing chest happens. sent12: the integumentariness happens if the construction happens. sent13: if the fact that the intruding existentialist occurs and the comforting kingfisher does not occur is not true then the integumentariness does not occur. sent14: that the anionicness happens is not wrong. sent15: the fetometry occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bridge occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the construction happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the construction does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the bridge does not occur.;
the conciliatoriness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the construction does not occur prevents the non-integumentariness. ; $context$ = sent1: the mass-spectrometricness happens. sent2: if the integumentariness does not occur then either the bridge does not occur or the construction does not occur or both. sent3: the Mark happens if the organization does not occur. sent4: the revival happens. sent5: if the mass-spectrometricness does not occur then that the intruding existentialist happens but the comforting kingfisher does not occur does not hold. sent6: the reinforcing obviation occurs. sent7: the bridge brings about that the construction occurs. sent8: the reinforcing madness happens. sent9: the commingling happens. sent10: that the reinforcing obviation does not occur prevents that the basset does not occur. sent11: the intruding existentialist occurs if the reinforcing chest happens. sent12: the integumentariness happens if the construction happens. sent13: if the fact that the intruding existentialist occurs and the comforting kingfisher does not occur is not true then the integumentariness does not occur. sent14: that the anionicness happens is not wrong. sent15: the fetometry occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bridge occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the construction happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the construction does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the bridge does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__