the gouache is not a kind of a baffled.
sent1: if the flybridge impinges porkchop then the fact that it is not a inanimateness is right. sent2: something does levitate but it is not a Phoeniculidae. sent3: the lout snatches. sent4: if there is something such that that it is a flask and it is not a kind of a inanimateness does not hold then the butadiene is nonarboreal. sent5: something is not Britannic and it does not snatch if it baffles. sent6: the fact that the lout does not impinge oldness and it is not a flask is wrong if it is nonarboreal. sent7: something is not atonal and it is not Britannic if it does snatch. sent8: there exists something such that it impinges porkchop and it is not actinomorphic. sent9: the gouache does not baffle if the fact that it is a flask and it is not a kind of a inanimateness hold. sent10: the tree is atonal if it is brimless. sent11: if something is a sarcosporidian it is brimless. sent12: if the tree is atonal that the lout is not atonal and not Britannic is wrong. sent13: the tree is a sarcosporidian if the butadiene is nonarboreal. sent14: the fact that the bluenose is a flask is right. sent15: something is nonarboreal if it is a sarcosporidian. sent16: that something is not a lamppost and it does not revert is true if it is a funeral-residence. sent17: the papyrus is atonal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gouache is a flask but it is not a kind of a inanimateness is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a flask and it is not a inanimateness is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the butadiene is nonarboreal.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the tree is a kind of a sarcosporidian.; sent11 -> int4: the tree is brimless if it is a kind of a sarcosporidian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tree is brimless.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the tree is atonal.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that the lout is not atonal and it is not Britannic does not hold.; sent7 -> int8: if the lout is a snatch then it is not atonal and it is not Britannic.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the lout is not atonal and it is not Britannic.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the gouache is a flask but not a inanimateness.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the lout does not impinge oldness and it is not a flask is wrong.
sent15 -> int12: if the lout is a sarcosporidian the fact that it is nonarboreal is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the gouache is not a kind of a baffled. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flybridge impinges porkchop then the fact that it is not a inanimateness is right. sent2: something does levitate but it is not a Phoeniculidae. sent3: the lout snatches. sent4: if there is something such that that it is a flask and it is not a kind of a inanimateness does not hold then the butadiene is nonarboreal. sent5: something is not Britannic and it does not snatch if it baffles. sent6: the fact that the lout does not impinge oldness and it is not a flask is wrong if it is nonarboreal. sent7: something is not atonal and it is not Britannic if it does snatch. sent8: there exists something such that it impinges porkchop and it is not actinomorphic. sent9: the gouache does not baffle if the fact that it is a flask and it is not a kind of a inanimateness hold. sent10: the tree is atonal if it is brimless. sent11: if something is a sarcosporidian it is brimless. sent12: if the tree is atonal that the lout is not atonal and not Britannic is wrong. sent13: the tree is a sarcosporidian if the butadiene is nonarboreal. sent14: the fact that the bluenose is a flask is right. sent15: something is nonarboreal if it is a sarcosporidian. sent16: that something is not a lamppost and it does not revert is true if it is a funeral-residence. sent17: the papyrus is atonal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gouache is a flask but it is not a kind of a inanimateness is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a flask and it is not a inanimateness is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the butadiene is nonarboreal.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the tree is a kind of a sarcosporidian.; sent11 -> int4: the tree is brimless if it is a kind of a sarcosporidian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tree is brimless.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the tree is atonal.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that the lout is not atonal and it is not Britannic does not hold.; sent7 -> int8: if the lout is a snatch then it is not atonal and it is not Britannic.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the lout is not atonal and it is not Britannic.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the gouache is a flask but not a inanimateness.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__