the LPN skims stoat but it does not rice.
sent1: something does mobilize if it is a kind of a sexton. sent2: the spicule skims stoat. sent3: if something is a twist the fact that it is undeniable is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the spicule is not a refilling but undeniable does not hold. sent5: the fact that the LPN is a sudatorium that does demulsify is false. sent6: if the spicule is not undeniable then it does skim cask. sent7: the spicule does demulsify. sent8: the LPN is a kind of a refilling. sent9: the spicule is a forward if it skims stoat and is a kind of a refilling. sent10: the LPN is not forward. sent11: the LPN demulsifies if it is a twist and it does not forward. sent12: if the spicule does skim cask the LPN is not a forward. sent13: the spicule is inelegant. sent14: the LPN is undeniable but not a rice. sent15: the Liverpudlian is a rice. sent16: if the spicule is a kind of a forward then the LPN is not a rice. sent17: the LPN does skim cask if it is an inductor. sent18: the LPN is a kind of a twist and is not a forward if the spicule does skim cask. sent19: the wright does skim stoat. sent20: the spicule skims cask if the fact that it is not a kind of a refilling and it is undeniable does not hold. sent21: if the LPN is a kind of a pinkroot it is impolitic. sent22: if something demulsifies it skims stoat and is not a rice. sent23: if something forwards then it does skim stoat. sent24: the LPN skims cask and does not forward.
sent20 & sent4 -> int1: the spicule does skim cask.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the LPN is both a twist and non-forward.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the LPN does demulsify.; sent22 -> int4: if that the LPN does demulsify is not false then it does skim stoat and it does not rice.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the LPN skims stoat but it does not rice. ; $context$ = sent1: something does mobilize if it is a kind of a sexton. sent2: the spicule skims stoat. sent3: if something is a twist the fact that it is undeniable is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the spicule is not a refilling but undeniable does not hold. sent5: the fact that the LPN is a sudatorium that does demulsify is false. sent6: if the spicule is not undeniable then it does skim cask. sent7: the spicule does demulsify. sent8: the LPN is a kind of a refilling. sent9: the spicule is a forward if it skims stoat and is a kind of a refilling. sent10: the LPN is not forward. sent11: the LPN demulsifies if it is a twist and it does not forward. sent12: if the spicule does skim cask the LPN is not a forward. sent13: the spicule is inelegant. sent14: the LPN is undeniable but not a rice. sent15: the Liverpudlian is a rice. sent16: if the spicule is a kind of a forward then the LPN is not a rice. sent17: the LPN does skim cask if it is an inductor. sent18: the LPN is a kind of a twist and is not a forward if the spicule does skim cask. sent19: the wright does skim stoat. sent20: the spicule skims cask if the fact that it is not a kind of a refilling and it is undeniable does not hold. sent21: if the LPN is a kind of a pinkroot it is impolitic. sent22: if something demulsifies it skims stoat and is not a rice. sent23: if something forwards then it does skim stoat. sent24: the LPN skims cask and does not forward. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent4 -> int1: the spicule does skim cask.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the LPN is both a twist and non-forward.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the LPN does demulsify.; sent22 -> int4: if that the LPN does demulsify is not false then it does skim stoat and it does not rice.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__