if that not the jumbling fanjet but the automaticness occurs is not true then the deactivation does not occur.
sent1: the jumbling fanjet and the automaticness happens. sent2: that the personifying counterespionage does not occur leads to that the reckoning and the overjoying occurs. sent3: that the personifying rosebay but not the unreactiveness occurs is wrong if the pureness occurs. sent4: the serviceableness occurs. sent5: the greenhouseness occurs. sent6: the jumbling fanjet occurs and the automatic happens if the deactivation happens. sent7: the seguing does not occur if the non-supernaturalistness and the non-tacticalness occurs. sent8: if the seguing does not occur then the pureness occurs. sent9: the variableness and the personifying Norma happens. sent10: if that the personifying rosebay and the reactiveness occurs is false the shuffle does not occur. sent11: if the palatine does not occur the fueling does not occur. sent12: that the deactivation does not occur is not wrong if the jumbling fanjet does not occur but the automatic happens. sent13: the personifying GRAPO does not occur. sent14: if the shuffle does not occur both the interlocking zamia and the deactivation occurs. sent15: that the personifying counterespionage does not occur and the jumbling USCB does not occur is brought about by that the imitation does not occur. sent16: that the non-supernaturalistness and the non-tacticalness occurs is triggered by that the reckoning occurs. sent17: if the ducalness happens the jumbling Liston does not occur but the anchorage happens. sent18: if that the personifying artilleryman does not occur but the overpaying happens is false the tinkling sandarac does not occur. sent19: that the congruousness does not occur and the residuariness happens yields the non-Ugandanness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deactivation occurs.;
the interlocking zamia occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if that not the jumbling fanjet but the automaticness occurs is not true then the deactivation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the jumbling fanjet and the automaticness happens. sent2: that the personifying counterespionage does not occur leads to that the reckoning and the overjoying occurs. sent3: that the personifying rosebay but not the unreactiveness occurs is wrong if the pureness occurs. sent4: the serviceableness occurs. sent5: the greenhouseness occurs. sent6: the jumbling fanjet occurs and the automatic happens if the deactivation happens. sent7: the seguing does not occur if the non-supernaturalistness and the non-tacticalness occurs. sent8: if the seguing does not occur then the pureness occurs. sent9: the variableness and the personifying Norma happens. sent10: if that the personifying rosebay and the reactiveness occurs is false the shuffle does not occur. sent11: if the palatine does not occur the fueling does not occur. sent12: that the deactivation does not occur is not wrong if the jumbling fanjet does not occur but the automatic happens. sent13: the personifying GRAPO does not occur. sent14: if the shuffle does not occur both the interlocking zamia and the deactivation occurs. sent15: that the personifying counterespionage does not occur and the jumbling USCB does not occur is brought about by that the imitation does not occur. sent16: that the non-supernaturalistness and the non-tacticalness occurs is triggered by that the reckoning occurs. sent17: if the ducalness happens the jumbling Liston does not occur but the anchorage happens. sent18: if that the personifying artilleryman does not occur but the overpaying happens is false the tinkling sandarac does not occur. sent19: that the congruousness does not occur and the residuariness happens yields the non-Ugandanness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deactivation occurs.; __UNKNOWN__