the PX does not forage alpaca.
sent1: the lobe does border scum. sent2: there is something such that it does stage. sent3: there exists something such that it does border scum. sent4: if the plaster is unconstitutional then the accelerator borders impressionist. sent5: something that fleers forages alpaca. sent6: if there is something such that it is apogamic then the PX is a fleer. sent7: that the PX does not forage alpaca is correct if the plaster does border scum. sent8: either something borders lowercase or it is grassless or both. sent9: if something borders impressionist or it is apogamic or both then the PX is a fleer. sent10: the lobe does border scum and stages. sent11: the plaster is unconstitutional if something does border scum and it stages.
sent10 -> int1: something does border scum and it is a staging.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the plaster is unconstitutional is not incorrect.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the accelerator borders impressionist.; int3 -> int4: the accelerator borders impressionist and/or is apogamic.; int4 -> int5: something borders impressionist and/or is apogamic.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the PX is a fleer.; sent5 -> int7: the PX does forage alpaca if that it is a fleer hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the PX does not forage alpaca.
$hypothesis$ = the PX does not forage alpaca. ; $context$ = sent1: the lobe does border scum. sent2: there is something such that it does stage. sent3: there exists something such that it does border scum. sent4: if the plaster is unconstitutional then the accelerator borders impressionist. sent5: something that fleers forages alpaca. sent6: if there is something such that it is apogamic then the PX is a fleer. sent7: that the PX does not forage alpaca is correct if the plaster does border scum. sent8: either something borders lowercase or it is grassless or both. sent9: if something borders impressionist or it is apogamic or both then the PX is a fleer. sent10: the lobe does border scum and stages. sent11: the plaster is unconstitutional if something does border scum and it stages. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: something does border scum and it is a staging.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the plaster is unconstitutional is not incorrect.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the accelerator borders impressionist.; int3 -> int4: the accelerator borders impressionist and/or is apogamic.; int4 -> int5: something borders impressionist and/or is apogamic.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the PX is a fleer.; sent5 -> int7: the PX does forage alpaca if that it is a fleer hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__