that the Savoyard does demagnetize greengage and does maintain grosbeak is false.
sent1: the fact that the roentgenogram is a kind of a name and it does suckle shooting is false. sent2: if that the roentgenogram is a kind of a name and it suckles shooting is not true then it is not a rhizopod. sent3: if the roentgenogram is not a rhizopod but a Liriope the cad is not a kind of a rhizopod. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is an entomologist is correct then the cad does demagnetize Defense and does not entrain. sent5: the fact that the cad does demagnetize Defense but it does not entrain is false. sent6: if there is something such that it is not an entomologist then the Savoyard does maintain grosbeak. sent7: that the alkyl is non-unwholesome a isoagglutinogen is not correct if it is not non-achromatinic. sent8: the cad does not entrain. sent9: the cad does not entrain if there exists something such that it is a kind of an entomologist. sent10: the alkyl is achromatinic. sent11: the Savoyard does demagnetize greengage. sent12: if something is not a kind of a rhizopod it suckles gelignite. sent13: The greengage does demagnetize Savoyard. sent14: the lumberjack demagnetizes Defense. sent15: there is something such that it does not demagnetize Defense. sent16: that the cad does demagnetize Defense and it does entrain does not hold. sent17: the cad ramifies. sent18: that something does not demagnetize Defense and does entrain is incorrect if it suckles gelignite.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Defense is an entomologist.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is an entomologist.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the cad demagnetizes Defense and does not entrain.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Defense is not a kind of an entomologist.; int4 -> int5: that something is not an entomologist hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the Savoyard does maintain grosbeak.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the lumberjack does entrain and is a kind of a blastula.
$hypothesis$ = that the Savoyard does demagnetize greengage and does maintain grosbeak is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the roentgenogram is a kind of a name and it does suckle shooting is false. sent2: if that the roentgenogram is a kind of a name and it suckles shooting is not true then it is not a rhizopod. sent3: if the roentgenogram is not a rhizopod but a Liriope the cad is not a kind of a rhizopod. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is an entomologist is correct then the cad does demagnetize Defense and does not entrain. sent5: the fact that the cad does demagnetize Defense but it does not entrain is false. sent6: if there is something such that it is not an entomologist then the Savoyard does maintain grosbeak. sent7: that the alkyl is non-unwholesome a isoagglutinogen is not correct if it is not non-achromatinic. sent8: the cad does not entrain. sent9: the cad does not entrain if there exists something such that it is a kind of an entomologist. sent10: the alkyl is achromatinic. sent11: the Savoyard does demagnetize greengage. sent12: if something is not a kind of a rhizopod it suckles gelignite. sent13: The greengage does demagnetize Savoyard. sent14: the lumberjack demagnetizes Defense. sent15: there is something such that it does not demagnetize Defense. sent16: that the cad does demagnetize Defense and it does entrain does not hold. sent17: the cad ramifies. sent18: that something does not demagnetize Defense and does entrain is incorrect if it suckles gelignite. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Defense is an entomologist.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is an entomologist.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the cad demagnetizes Defense and does not entrain.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Defense is not a kind of an entomologist.; int4 -> int5: that something is not an entomologist hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the Savoyard does maintain grosbeak.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__