that the wonderland does not magnetize lox and it is not appointive is false.
sent1: something criticizes Dyirbal. sent2: if the fact that something is not a settler and it is not literal is wrong it is a kind of a Pakistani. sent3: the bioelectricity does evaluate and is immature if something is a kind of a Pakistani. sent4: if the moneran is a sensationalism then the fact that the palisade is a sensationalism is true. sent5: there is something such that it is not a Osaka but a sensationalism. sent6: the extraction is a settler but it is not literal. sent7: the bioelectricity is not Pakistani if the extraction is a settler that is non-literal. sent8: that that the crocodile does not evaluate but it is immature does not hold hold if there exists something such that it is not a Pakistani. sent9: the crocodile is immature if something that is not a Osaka is a sensationalism. sent10: the glutton is not appointive if the fact that it does evaluate and is skeletal is not incorrect. sent11: if the moneran does criticize Dyirbal then the palisade is a sensationalism. sent12: there is something such that that it is not a settler and it is literal is not true. sent13: that the fact that the extraction is both not a settler and not literal is incorrect if the palisade is a Osaka is right. sent14: if the crocodile is not appointive then the wonderland does not magnetize lox and is not appointive. sent15: the moneran either is a sensationalism or does criticize Dyirbal or both if something criticize Dyirbal. sent16: something does not evaluate if it is not skeletal. sent17: the crocodile is non-skeletal if it is appointive. sent18: the glutton is both a commissionaire and not non-immature.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the crocodile is appointive is not false.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the crocodile is not skeletal.; sent16 -> int2: if the crocodile is not skeletal then it does not evaluate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crocodile does not evaluate.; sent5 & sent9 -> int4: the crocodile is immature.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the crocodile does not evaluate but it is immature.; sent7 & sent6 -> int6: the bioelectricity is non-Pakistani.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a Pakistani.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the crocodile does not evaluate but it is immature does not hold.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the crocodile is not appointive.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the glutton is a commissionaire but it is not appointive.
sent18 -> int11: the glutton is a commissionaire.;
$hypothesis$ = that the wonderland does not magnetize lox and it is not appointive is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something criticizes Dyirbal. sent2: if the fact that something is not a settler and it is not literal is wrong it is a kind of a Pakistani. sent3: the bioelectricity does evaluate and is immature if something is a kind of a Pakistani. sent4: if the moneran is a sensationalism then the fact that the palisade is a sensationalism is true. sent5: there is something such that it is not a Osaka but a sensationalism. sent6: the extraction is a settler but it is not literal. sent7: the bioelectricity is not Pakistani if the extraction is a settler that is non-literal. sent8: that that the crocodile does not evaluate but it is immature does not hold hold if there exists something such that it is not a Pakistani. sent9: the crocodile is immature if something that is not a Osaka is a sensationalism. sent10: the glutton is not appointive if the fact that it does evaluate and is skeletal is not incorrect. sent11: if the moneran does criticize Dyirbal then the palisade is a sensationalism. sent12: there is something such that that it is not a settler and it is literal is not true. sent13: that the fact that the extraction is both not a settler and not literal is incorrect if the palisade is a Osaka is right. sent14: if the crocodile is not appointive then the wonderland does not magnetize lox and is not appointive. sent15: the moneran either is a sensationalism or does criticize Dyirbal or both if something criticize Dyirbal. sent16: something does not evaluate if it is not skeletal. sent17: the crocodile is non-skeletal if it is appointive. sent18: the glutton is both a commissionaire and not non-immature. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the crocodile is appointive is not false.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the crocodile is not skeletal.; sent16 -> int2: if the crocodile is not skeletal then it does not evaluate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crocodile does not evaluate.; sent5 & sent9 -> int4: the crocodile is immature.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the crocodile does not evaluate but it is immature.; sent7 & sent6 -> int6: the bioelectricity is non-Pakistani.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a Pakistani.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the crocodile does not evaluate but it is immature does not hold.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the crocodile is not appointive.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__