the rawhide is integumentary.
sent1: if there is something such that it is not enthusiastic then the rawhide is not integumentary and is not servile. sent2: there exists something such that it is not enthusiastic. sent3: the rawhide is non-midi thing that does not gobble. sent4: if the rawhide is not enthusiastic and it is not integumentary then that the carpetbagger is not servile is not wrong. sent5: if the fact that the deification does not gobble but it is a bollard is not right it is a gobble. sent6: the deification is transitional.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the rawhide is not integumentary and it is not servile.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the carpetbagger is not servile.
$hypothesis$ = the rawhide is integumentary. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not enthusiastic then the rawhide is not integumentary and is not servile. sent2: there exists something such that it is not enthusiastic. sent3: the rawhide is non-midi thing that does not gobble. sent4: if the rawhide is not enthusiastic and it is not integumentary then that the carpetbagger is not servile is not wrong. sent5: if the fact that the deification does not gobble but it is a bollard is not right it is a gobble. sent6: the deification is transitional. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the rawhide is not integumentary and it is not servile.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__