the arsenate does tint.
sent1: something that is amicable and a bulletin does not remove barong. sent2: something does remove barong if it is a kind of a Semite. sent3: if the draftee does blood the juice does commingle. sent4: if the juice does remove barong then the draftee is not amicable. sent5: that the draftee is a kind of a welcoming hold. sent6: if the draftee dances bravo then it is amicable. sent7: if something does not bulletin it bloods. sent8: if the veneering is a Clorox the arsenate does tint. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Semite and/or does tint does not hold. sent10: the draftee is a kind of a Semite if it welcomes. sent11: the fact that the draftee dances bravo or is not a kind of an afternoon or both is true. sent12: if the draftee dances bravo or it is not a kind of an afternoon or both then it is amicable. sent13: something does remove barong and/or it does not blood if the fact that it does not commingle is correct.
sent12 & sent11 -> int1: the draftee is amicable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the draftee does bulletin.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the draftee is amicable and it is a kind of a bulletin.; sent1 -> int3: the fact that the draftee does not remove barong is not wrong if it is amicable and it is a kind of a bulletin.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the draftee does not remove barong.; sent2 -> int5: if that the draftee is a Semite hold it removes barong.; sent10 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the draftee is a kind of a Semite is not false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the draftee does remove barong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the draftee does not bulletin.; sent7 -> int10: if the draftee does not bulletin it is a blood.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the draftee does blood.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the juice does commingle.;
the echinococcus is palingenetic and/or it is not a Clorox.
sent13 -> int13: the juice does remove barong and/or it is not a blood if it does not commingle.;
$hypothesis$ = the arsenate does tint. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is amicable and a bulletin does not remove barong. sent2: something does remove barong if it is a kind of a Semite. sent3: if the draftee does blood the juice does commingle. sent4: if the juice does remove barong then the draftee is not amicable. sent5: that the draftee is a kind of a welcoming hold. sent6: if the draftee dances bravo then it is amicable. sent7: if something does not bulletin it bloods. sent8: if the veneering is a Clorox the arsenate does tint. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Semite and/or does tint does not hold. sent10: the draftee is a kind of a Semite if it welcomes. sent11: the fact that the draftee dances bravo or is not a kind of an afternoon or both is true. sent12: if the draftee dances bravo or it is not a kind of an afternoon or both then it is amicable. sent13: something does remove barong and/or it does not blood if the fact that it does not commingle is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent11 -> int1: the draftee is amicable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the draftee does bulletin.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the draftee is amicable and it is a kind of a bulletin.; sent1 -> int3: the fact that the draftee does not remove barong is not wrong if it is amicable and it is a kind of a bulletin.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the draftee does not remove barong.; sent2 -> int5: if that the draftee is a Semite hold it removes barong.; sent10 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the draftee is a kind of a Semite is not false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the draftee does remove barong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the draftee does not bulletin.; sent7 -> int10: if the draftee does not bulletin it is a blood.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the draftee does blood.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the juice does commingle.; __UNKNOWN__