the fact that the sternwheeler is a waxycap that effects abstractionism is not right.
sent1: if the morion is not unreproducible and/or does trip Hamamelidanthum then the teamster is not a Porifera. sent2: the teamster is unreproducible if the oilfield does not effect odalisque. sent3: if the morion is not a kind of a Porifera and/or it is dispensable the oilfield does not effect odalisque. sent4: that the sternwheeler is a waxycap and it effects abstractionism hold if something effects morion. sent5: the fact that that the morion is a kind of a Porifera but it does not effect abstractionism is not right is not incorrect. sent6: that the teamster trips Hamamelidanthum and is not a kind of a Mexican is not true if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Mexican hold. sent7: if the fact that the morion is not a Porifera or dispensable or both does not hold then the Phallus does effect morion. sent8: there is something such that it is a Mexican. sent9: if the fact that something does trip Hamamelidanthum and is not Mexican is not correct then it is not unreproducible. sent10: the morion does trip Hamamelidanthum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the morion is not a kind of a Porifera and/or it is dispensable.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the oilfield does not effect odalisque.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the teamster is unreproducible.; sent9 -> int3: the teamster is not unreproducible if the fact that it trips Hamamelidanthum and is not a kind of a Mexican is not correct.; sent8 & sent6 -> int4: that the teamster trips Hamamelidanthum and is not a kind of a Mexican is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the teamster is not unreproducible.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the morion is not a Porifera or it is dispensable or both does not hold.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the Phallus does effect morion.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does effect morion.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sternwheeler is a waxycap that effects abstractionism is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the morion is not unreproducible and/or does trip Hamamelidanthum then the teamster is not a Porifera. sent2: the teamster is unreproducible if the oilfield does not effect odalisque. sent3: if the morion is not a kind of a Porifera and/or it is dispensable the oilfield does not effect odalisque. sent4: that the sternwheeler is a waxycap and it effects abstractionism hold if something effects morion. sent5: the fact that that the morion is a kind of a Porifera but it does not effect abstractionism is not right is not incorrect. sent6: that the teamster trips Hamamelidanthum and is not a kind of a Mexican is not true if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Mexican hold. sent7: if the fact that the morion is not a Porifera or dispensable or both does not hold then the Phallus does effect morion. sent8: there is something such that it is a Mexican. sent9: if the fact that something does trip Hamamelidanthum and is not Mexican is not correct then it is not unreproducible. sent10: the morion does trip Hamamelidanthum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the morion is not a kind of a Porifera and/or it is dispensable.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the oilfield does not effect odalisque.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the teamster is unreproducible.; sent9 -> int3: the teamster is not unreproducible if the fact that it trips Hamamelidanthum and is not a kind of a Mexican is not correct.; sent8 & sent6 -> int4: that the teamster trips Hamamelidanthum and is not a kind of a Mexican is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the teamster is not unreproducible.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the morion is not a Porifera or it is dispensable or both does not hold.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the Phallus does effect morion.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does effect morion.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__