the canoeist is non-antidotal a walnut.
sent1: something is not antidotal and is a kind of a walnut if it is not a kind of a Neosporin. sent2: that something is not antidotal but it is a kind of a walnut is not correct if it does suck. sent3: the bisque is a kind of a walnut if that the pantaloon does not forage scarab but it is antidotal is not correct. sent4: something does effect if it borders hominy. sent5: something that sucks effects. sent6: the fact that something is a Neosporin but it does not border hominy does not hold if it is a kind of an effects. sent7: if something is a Neosporin then that it is representative thing that is easy is not true. sent8: if the bisque sucks it borders hominy. sent9: if something forages scarab then it does suck. sent10: the skinhead is a kind of a Neosporin if the fact that the pantaloon effects hold. sent11: the canoeist does suck if something does border hominy. sent12: if something is a Neosporin then it borders hominy. sent13: the fact that the bisque is not easy but it is a notion does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the bisque is a kind of non-easy a notion is wrong then the pantaloon is a kind of an effects.
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the pantaloon effects.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the skinhead is a Neosporin.; sent12 -> int3: the skinhead borders hominy if it is a kind of a Neosporin.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the skinhead borders hominy.; int4 -> int5: something does border hominy.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the canoeist sucks.; sent2 -> int7: if the canoeist sucks the fact that it is not antidotal but a walnut is not right.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the scarab is not nonrepresentative and not uneasy is false.
sent7 -> int8: that the scarab is not nonrepresentative and is easy is not correct if it is a Neosporin.; sent6 -> int9: if the bisque is a kind of an effects then the fact that it is a kind of a Neosporin that does not border hominy is not right.; sent5 -> int10: if the bisque sucks then it is an effects.;
$hypothesis$ = the canoeist is non-antidotal a walnut. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not antidotal and is a kind of a walnut if it is not a kind of a Neosporin. sent2: that something is not antidotal but it is a kind of a walnut is not correct if it does suck. sent3: the bisque is a kind of a walnut if that the pantaloon does not forage scarab but it is antidotal is not correct. sent4: something does effect if it borders hominy. sent5: something that sucks effects. sent6: the fact that something is a Neosporin but it does not border hominy does not hold if it is a kind of an effects. sent7: if something is a Neosporin then that it is representative thing that is easy is not true. sent8: if the bisque sucks it borders hominy. sent9: if something forages scarab then it does suck. sent10: the skinhead is a kind of a Neosporin if the fact that the pantaloon effects hold. sent11: the canoeist does suck if something does border hominy. sent12: if something is a Neosporin then it borders hominy. sent13: the fact that the bisque is not easy but it is a notion does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the bisque is a kind of non-easy a notion is wrong then the pantaloon is a kind of an effects. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the pantaloon effects.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the skinhead is a Neosporin.; sent12 -> int3: the skinhead borders hominy if it is a kind of a Neosporin.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the skinhead borders hominy.; int4 -> int5: something does border hominy.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the canoeist sucks.; sent2 -> int7: if the canoeist sucks the fact that it is not antidotal but a walnut is not right.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__