that if the high-tensionness happens then the malformation does not occur and the deploying does not occur is wrong.
sent1: that the paving and the malformation occurs prevents the high-tensionness. sent2: that the Agriculture and the unapproachableness happens is caused by the non-adenoidness. sent3: the gape but not the adenoidness occurs. sent4: the fact that the hornpipe does not occur is true. sent5: the paving occurs and the countercoup occurs. sent6: the hunt does not occur. sent7: the immortalizing NRTI does not occur. sent8: that the development does not occur leads to that the essentialness occurs. sent9: if the unapproachableness happens then the deploying does not occur.
sent5 -> int1: the paving happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the malformation happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the paving and the malformation happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the high-tensionness does not occur hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the high-tensionness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the malformation does not occur.; sent3 -> int6: that the adenoid does not occur is not wrong.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the Agriculture happens and the unapproachableness occurs hold.; int7 -> int8: the unapproachableness happens.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the deploying does not occur.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the malformation does not occur and the deploying does not occur.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the high-tensionness happens then the malformation does not occur and the deploying does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the paving and the malformation occurs prevents the high-tensionness. sent2: that the Agriculture and the unapproachableness happens is caused by the non-adenoidness. sent3: the gape but not the adenoidness occurs. sent4: the fact that the hornpipe does not occur is true. sent5: the paving occurs and the countercoup occurs. sent6: the hunt does not occur. sent7: the immortalizing NRTI does not occur. sent8: that the development does not occur leads to that the essentialness occurs. sent9: if the unapproachableness happens then the deploying does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the paving happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the malformation happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the paving and the malformation happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the high-tensionness does not occur hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the high-tensionness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the malformation does not occur.; sent3 -> int6: that the adenoid does not occur is not wrong.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the Agriculture happens and the unapproachableness occurs hold.; int7 -> int8: the unapproachableness happens.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the deploying does not occur.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the malformation does not occur and the deploying does not occur.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__