the cookout dredges.
sent1: there exists something such that it does not oppose antagonism. sent2: the spinmeister does not ablate if there is something such that it does transitivize. sent3: the cookout is a plagiarism if it does dredge. sent4: the spinmeister is not a dredge. sent5: if the deterioration is a plagiarism it retrains. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not ablate and it is a plagiarism the spinmeister does not transitivize. sent7: if something is not a dredge then it is not acroscopic and it is hemispherical. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not hemispherical is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that that it is not numeric and it does not transitivize does not hold. sent10: if that the Creek is not numeric is false then it transitivizes. sent11: if the Creek transitivizes then the fact that it is not hemispherical and ablates does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it is numeric and it does not transitivize is wrong. sent13: the spinmeister does transitivize if there is something such that that it is not numeric and it does not transitivize does not hold. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not hemispherical the cookout does not ablate. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is not senatorial and is not hemispherical is false the cookout is hemispherical. sent16: if the artiodactyl does not ablate then the fact that the spinmeister does not dredge and it is not a plagiarism does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cookout dredges.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the cookout is a plagiarism.; sent8 & sent14 -> int2: the cookout does not ablate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cookout does not ablate and is a plagiarism.; int3 -> int4: something does not ablate and is a kind of a plagiarism.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the spinmeister does not transitivize.; sent9 & sent13 -> int6: the spinmeister transitivizes.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the enclosure is not acroscopic but it is hemispherical.
sent7 -> int8: the enclosure is both not acroscopic and hemispherical if it is not a dredge.;
$hypothesis$ = the cookout dredges. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does not oppose antagonism. sent2: the spinmeister does not ablate if there is something such that it does transitivize. sent3: the cookout is a plagiarism if it does dredge. sent4: the spinmeister is not a dredge. sent5: if the deterioration is a plagiarism it retrains. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not ablate and it is a plagiarism the spinmeister does not transitivize. sent7: if something is not a dredge then it is not acroscopic and it is hemispherical. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not hemispherical is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that that it is not numeric and it does not transitivize does not hold. sent10: if that the Creek is not numeric is false then it transitivizes. sent11: if the Creek transitivizes then the fact that it is not hemispherical and ablates does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it is numeric and it does not transitivize is wrong. sent13: the spinmeister does transitivize if there is something such that that it is not numeric and it does not transitivize does not hold. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not hemispherical the cookout does not ablate. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is not senatorial and is not hemispherical is false the cookout is hemispherical. sent16: if the artiodactyl does not ablate then the fact that the spinmeister does not dredge and it is not a plagiarism does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cookout dredges.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the cookout is a plagiarism.; sent8 & sent14 -> int2: the cookout does not ablate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cookout does not ablate and is a plagiarism.; int3 -> int4: something does not ablate and is a kind of a plagiarism.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the spinmeister does not transitivize.; sent9 & sent13 -> int6: the spinmeister transitivizes.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__