the kaffiyeh is biauricular but it is not a kind of a Parthian.
sent1: the fowl is unperceptive. sent2: the fact that everything is not Parthian hold. sent3: if the matzo is non-Altaic a headset the kaffiyeh is unperceptive. sent4: if the fowl does not relive it is a Akeridae and it is a kind of a Altaic. sent5: the fact that the pilewort does not relive but it is younger is not true if that it is not unprophetic is right. sent6: if something does manhandle Oenothera and it is unperceptive it is not a headset. sent7: the kaffiyeh is not Parthian if there is something such that it is not a headset. sent8: something is not a kind of a Parthian if that it does not manhandle Oenothera and is unperceptive is false. sent9: the fowl does not relive. sent10: that something is biauricular but it is not a Parthian is not right if it is unperceptive. sent11: if the fact that something does not severalize signet but it does manhandle Oenothera is wrong it is not a Altaic. sent12: the kaffiyeh does not add amphidiploidy. sent13: the kaffiyeh does not relive. sent14: if the fowl does not relive it is a Akeridae. sent15: something is not a Altaic but a headset if it is not a Akeridae. sent16: if something does severalize signet that it is not Altaic is right. sent17: something is not a Akeridae.
sent11 -> int1: the fowl is not a kind of a Altaic if that it does not severalize signet and it does manhandle Oenothera does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fowl does not severalize signet but it manhandles Oenothera is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fowl is not a Altaic.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: the fowl is a Akeridae and Altaic.; int3 -> int4: the fowl is a Altaic.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fowl does not severalize signet but it does manhandle Oenothera.; int6 -> int7: the fowl does manhandle Oenothera.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the fowl does manhandle Oenothera and is unperceptive.; sent6 -> int9: if the fowl does manhandle Oenothera and it is unperceptive then it is not a headset.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fowl is not a headset.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a headset.;
the permafrost does not relive.
sent2 -> int12: the kaffiyeh is not a Parthian.;
$hypothesis$ = the kaffiyeh is biauricular but it is not a kind of a Parthian. ; $context$ = sent1: the fowl is unperceptive. sent2: the fact that everything is not Parthian hold. sent3: if the matzo is non-Altaic a headset the kaffiyeh is unperceptive. sent4: if the fowl does not relive it is a Akeridae and it is a kind of a Altaic. sent5: the fact that the pilewort does not relive but it is younger is not true if that it is not unprophetic is right. sent6: if something does manhandle Oenothera and it is unperceptive it is not a headset. sent7: the kaffiyeh is not Parthian if there is something such that it is not a headset. sent8: something is not a kind of a Parthian if that it does not manhandle Oenothera and is unperceptive is false. sent9: the fowl does not relive. sent10: that something is biauricular but it is not a Parthian is not right if it is unperceptive. sent11: if the fact that something does not severalize signet but it does manhandle Oenothera is wrong it is not a Altaic. sent12: the kaffiyeh does not add amphidiploidy. sent13: the kaffiyeh does not relive. sent14: if the fowl does not relive it is a Akeridae. sent15: something is not a Altaic but a headset if it is not a Akeridae. sent16: if something does severalize signet that it is not Altaic is right. sent17: something is not a Akeridae. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the fowl is not a kind of a Altaic if that it does not severalize signet and it does manhandle Oenothera does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fowl does not severalize signet but it manhandles Oenothera is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fowl is not a Altaic.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: the fowl is a Akeridae and Altaic.; int3 -> int4: the fowl is a Altaic.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fowl does not severalize signet but it does manhandle Oenothera.; int6 -> int7: the fowl does manhandle Oenothera.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the fowl does manhandle Oenothera and is unperceptive.; sent6 -> int9: if the fowl does manhandle Oenothera and it is unperceptive then it is not a headset.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fowl is not a headset.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a headset.; __UNKNOWN__