that there exists something such that if it is a twinkler it is not antigenic and/or it is an effluent does not hold.
sent1: the evolution does not browse buttinsky. sent2: if the evolution is Australasian it is not a kind of a Meniere and/or it configures stymie. sent3: if that the evolution is myocardial is true it is not a tropic. sent4: something is not a twinkler if it is antigenic. sent5: the evolution is not a kind of a huckster if it is a parapsychologist. sent6: there is something such that if it does disunify Hydnaceae then either it is not an exporting or it corsets Qaddafi or both. sent7: the evolution is not botryoid and/or configures loonie. sent8: there exists something such that if it is hydrophobic then it is not a lumpenproletariat or it configures advocacy or both. sent9: if the carport is congregational it is not an effluent. sent10: the evolution is a twinkler if it is a kind of a pilocarpine. sent11: something is not a kind of a downtown if it is unreliable. sent12: if something is psychometric then it is not nonextensile. sent13: the evolution is a lumpenproletariat if it is antigenic. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a general then it is a kind of a Mariposan and/or it is an order. sent15: the fact that if the billy is the videotape then that the billy is hydrophobic is correct is not false. sent16: the bloomer is not an integument and/or is a kind of a Siouan. sent17: the intranet is Australasian. sent18: the evolution is not fearful. sent19: something is not a spore if it is masonic. sent20: the evolution is not glossopharyngeal.
sent4 -> int1: if the evolution is antigenic it is not a twinkler.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the evolution is antigenic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the evolution is not a kind of a twinkler.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the evolution is a twinkler.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the evolution is not antigenic.; int4 -> int5: the evolution is not antigenic and/or is an effluent.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the evolution is not antigenic or an effluent or both if that it is a twinkler is not incorrect.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a twinkler it is not antigenic and/or it is an effluent does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the evolution does not browse buttinsky. sent2: if the evolution is Australasian it is not a kind of a Meniere and/or it configures stymie. sent3: if that the evolution is myocardial is true it is not a tropic. sent4: something is not a twinkler if it is antigenic. sent5: the evolution is not a kind of a huckster if it is a parapsychologist. sent6: there is something such that if it does disunify Hydnaceae then either it is not an exporting or it corsets Qaddafi or both. sent7: the evolution is not botryoid and/or configures loonie. sent8: there exists something such that if it is hydrophobic then it is not a lumpenproletariat or it configures advocacy or both. sent9: if the carport is congregational it is not an effluent. sent10: the evolution is a twinkler if it is a kind of a pilocarpine. sent11: something is not a kind of a downtown if it is unreliable. sent12: if something is psychometric then it is not nonextensile. sent13: the evolution is a lumpenproletariat if it is antigenic. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a general then it is a kind of a Mariposan and/or it is an order. sent15: the fact that if the billy is the videotape then that the billy is hydrophobic is correct is not false. sent16: the bloomer is not an integument and/or is a kind of a Siouan. sent17: the intranet is Australasian. sent18: the evolution is not fearful. sent19: something is not a spore if it is masonic. sent20: the evolution is not glossopharyngeal. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the evolution is antigenic it is not a twinkler.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the evolution is antigenic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the evolution is not a kind of a twinkler.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the evolution is a twinkler.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the evolution is not antigenic.; int4 -> int5: the evolution is not antigenic and/or is an effluent.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the evolution is not antigenic or an effluent or both if that it is a twinkler is not incorrect.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__