there exists something such that if it is a Erigeron that is a kind of a Chipewyan it is not a kind of a Weizenbock.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it is refractive and blastocoelic is not wrong then that it is not a kind of a devise is not false. sent2: the Turk's-cap is a Weizenbock if it is both a Erigeron and a Chipewyan. sent3: if the Turk's-cap is autobiographical thing that is epistemic then it is not a liberalization. sent4: if a Erigeron is a Chipewyan then it is a Weizenbock. sent5: if the cabbage is an indignity and it is a kind of a homopteran then it is not cathectic. sent6: if something is a Erigeron and it is a Chipewyan then it is not a kind of a Weizenbock. sent7: if something that is a kind of a kilderkin is a Muscovite the fact that it is not a kind of a acervulus is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Erigeron and it is a Chipewyan then it is a kind of a Weizenbock.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Turk's-cap is not a kind of a Weizenbock is not incorrect if it is a Erigeron and it is a Chipewyan.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the dideoxycytosine is not a acervulus if it is a kind of a kilderkin and it is Muscovite.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a Erigeron that is a kind of a Chipewyan it is not a kind of a Weizenbock. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is refractive and blastocoelic is not wrong then that it is not a kind of a devise is not false. sent2: the Turk's-cap is a Weizenbock if it is both a Erigeron and a Chipewyan. sent3: if the Turk's-cap is autobiographical thing that is epistemic then it is not a liberalization. sent4: if a Erigeron is a Chipewyan then it is a Weizenbock. sent5: if the cabbage is an indignity and it is a kind of a homopteran then it is not cathectic. sent6: if something is a Erigeron and it is a Chipewyan then it is not a kind of a Weizenbock. sent7: if something that is a kind of a kilderkin is a Muscovite the fact that it is not a kind of a acervulus is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Erigeron and it is a Chipewyan then it is a kind of a Weizenbock. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Turk's-cap is not a kind of a Weizenbock is not incorrect if it is a Erigeron and it is a Chipewyan.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__