the fact that the dreaming Sinbad does not occur is right.
sent1: that the nonunionness does not occur hold if the fact that not the exhaling swot but the concrete occurs does not hold. sent2: if the nonlinguisticness occurs then the malversation does not occur. sent3: if that the anaestheticness but not the pyrochemicalness happens is false the fact that the crosstalk happens hold. sent4: that the dreaming Sinbad happens is prevented by the ambitiousness. sent5: if both the non-nonspecificness and the crosstalk occurs then the Alexandrian happens. sent6: the fact that the exhaling swot does not occur and the concrete happens does not hold. sent7: the malversation does not occur. sent8: the non-anaestheticness prevents that the crosstalk does not occur. sent9: the dreaming Sinbad does not occur if the nonspecificness happens and/or the ambitiousness occurs. sent10: the Alexandrian does not occur and the malversation does not occur if the nonlinguisticness happens. sent11: that the exhaling swot occurs and the concrete occurs is wrong. sent12: if the nonunionness does not occur that the anaestheticness but not the pyrochemicalness happens is wrong. sent13: the nonunionness does not occur if the fact that the exhaling swot occurs is right.
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the nonunionness does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that both the anaestheticness and the non-pyrochemicalness happens does not hold.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the crosstalk occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the nonspecificness does not occur hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the specificness and the crosstalk happens.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Alexandrianness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dreaming Sinbad does not occur is right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the nonunionness does not occur hold if the fact that not the exhaling swot but the concrete occurs does not hold. sent2: if the nonlinguisticness occurs then the malversation does not occur. sent3: if that the anaestheticness but not the pyrochemicalness happens is false the fact that the crosstalk happens hold. sent4: that the dreaming Sinbad happens is prevented by the ambitiousness. sent5: if both the non-nonspecificness and the crosstalk occurs then the Alexandrian happens. sent6: the fact that the exhaling swot does not occur and the concrete happens does not hold. sent7: the malversation does not occur. sent8: the non-anaestheticness prevents that the crosstalk does not occur. sent9: the dreaming Sinbad does not occur if the nonspecificness happens and/or the ambitiousness occurs. sent10: the Alexandrian does not occur and the malversation does not occur if the nonlinguisticness happens. sent11: that the exhaling swot occurs and the concrete occurs is wrong. sent12: if the nonunionness does not occur that the anaestheticness but not the pyrochemicalness happens is wrong. sent13: the nonunionness does not occur if the fact that the exhaling swot occurs is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the nonunionness does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that both the anaestheticness and the non-pyrochemicalness happens does not hold.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the crosstalk occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the nonspecificness does not occur hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the specificness and the crosstalk happens.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Alexandrianness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__