the flavone is archiepiscopal and yogistic.
sent1: something is yogistic and/or is archiepiscopal. sent2: if the cryptocoryne is behavioral the fact that the archeologist is not opaque hold. sent3: the flavone is archiepiscopal. sent4: the cryptocoryne is behavioral if the fricassee is behavioral. sent5: if there is something such that either it is a guttural or it is not a Lexington or both then the flavone is yogistic. sent6: there exists something such that it is a guttural and/or it is a Lexington. sent7: if the fact that the haddock is not a perry but a Nauruan is not correct the fricassee is behavioral. sent8: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Lexington the flavone is a bestiality. sent9: if there is something such that it either is not opaque or is not a Korean or both then the scissortail is not a kind of a Korean. sent10: the fact that something is not a perry but it is not non-Nauruan is false if it does criticize hypoadrenalism. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is Nauruan thing that is not a kind of a perry is wrong. sent12: the haddock criticizes hypoadrenalism and it is aeromechanic. sent13: if something is opaque it is behavioral. sent14: there is something such that it is archiepiscopal and/or it is not yogistic.
the pip is yogistic.
sent13 -> int1: that if the scissortail is opaque the scissortail is behavioral is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the flavone is archiepiscopal and yogistic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is yogistic and/or is archiepiscopal. sent2: if the cryptocoryne is behavioral the fact that the archeologist is not opaque hold. sent3: the flavone is archiepiscopal. sent4: the cryptocoryne is behavioral if the fricassee is behavioral. sent5: if there is something such that either it is a guttural or it is not a Lexington or both then the flavone is yogistic. sent6: there exists something such that it is a guttural and/or it is a Lexington. sent7: if the fact that the haddock is not a perry but a Nauruan is not correct the fricassee is behavioral. sent8: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Lexington the flavone is a bestiality. sent9: if there is something such that it either is not opaque or is not a Korean or both then the scissortail is not a kind of a Korean. sent10: the fact that something is not a perry but it is not non-Nauruan is false if it does criticize hypoadrenalism. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is Nauruan thing that is not a kind of a perry is wrong. sent12: the haddock criticizes hypoadrenalism and it is aeromechanic. sent13: if something is opaque it is behavioral. sent14: there is something such that it is archiepiscopal and/or it is not yogistic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__