the multiflora jams stoker if the Cabernet thins.
sent1: if the multiflora is a taipan it is a kind of a cylinder. sent2: if the bathrobe jams stoker the multiflora is a cylinder. sent3: the fact that the sporangium is both non-thin and asyndetic does not hold. sent4: if the sporangium does jam stoker the fact that the multiflora is not tensile but it jams featherfoil is wrong. sent5: if the fact that the bathrobe does jam featherfoil is true it is asyndetic. sent6: if the fact that the Cabernet is both a compatibility and an inglenook does not hold it does not blanket rofecoxib. sent7: the bathrobe is a kind of a cylinder if the fact that the sporangium is not asyndetic but it is tensile is wrong. sent8: if something is atomistic then it services. sent9: that the Cabernet is a compatibility and an inglenook does not hold. sent10: the Cabernet is a kind of a ballcock. sent11: the fact that the Cabernet is not thin but it is a taipan is not correct. sent12: that the fact that the sporangium is not asyndetic and is tensile does not hold hold if the Cabernet is thin. sent13: that the bathrobe is not a cylinder and is tensile does not hold. sent14: if something is a kind of a taipan then it does jam stoker. sent15: if the Cabernet is tensile the sporangium does thin. sent16: if the fact that something jams featherfoil is not incorrect then it is tensile. sent17: something that is not thin and not a cylinder does not jam stoker. sent18: if something is a cylinder then it does jam featherfoil. sent19: if the bathrobe jams featherfoil then the multiflora is a taipan. sent20: the multiflora thins if the Cabernet does jam stoker. sent21: if something does not blanket rofecoxib it is a kind of a Ephesians that does jam diapason. sent22: the bathrobe is a cylinder if the sporangium is not tensile. sent23: if the Cabernet is Ephesians the sporangium is not a taipan and does not jam featherfoil.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cabernet is thin.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sporangium is non-asyndetic thing that is tensile is not true.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the bathrobe is a kind of a cylinder.; sent18 -> int3: the fact that the bathrobe does not jam featherfoil is incorrect if that it is a kind of a cylinder is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bathrobe jams featherfoil.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the multiflora is a kind of a taipan.; sent14 -> int6: if the multiflora is a kind of a taipan then it jams stoker.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the multiflora jams stoker.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the sporangium does jam stoker.
sent17 -> int8: the sporangium does jam stoker if it is non-thin thing that is not a cylinder.; sent21 -> int9: the fact that the Cabernet is the Ephesians and it does jam diapason if the Cabernet does not blanket rofecoxib is not incorrect.; sent6 & sent9 -> int10: the Cabernet does not blanket rofecoxib.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Cabernet is a Ephesians and it jams diapason.; int11 -> int12: the Cabernet is a kind of a Ephesians.; sent23 & int12 -> int13: the sporangium is not a taipan and it does not jam featherfoil.; int13 -> int14: that the sporangium does not jam featherfoil is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the multiflora jams stoker if the Cabernet thins. ; $context$ = sent1: if the multiflora is a taipan it is a kind of a cylinder. sent2: if the bathrobe jams stoker the multiflora is a cylinder. sent3: the fact that the sporangium is both non-thin and asyndetic does not hold. sent4: if the sporangium does jam stoker the fact that the multiflora is not tensile but it jams featherfoil is wrong. sent5: if the fact that the bathrobe does jam featherfoil is true it is asyndetic. sent6: if the fact that the Cabernet is both a compatibility and an inglenook does not hold it does not blanket rofecoxib. sent7: the bathrobe is a kind of a cylinder if the fact that the sporangium is not asyndetic but it is tensile is wrong. sent8: if something is atomistic then it services. sent9: that the Cabernet is a compatibility and an inglenook does not hold. sent10: the Cabernet is a kind of a ballcock. sent11: the fact that the Cabernet is not thin but it is a taipan is not correct. sent12: that the fact that the sporangium is not asyndetic and is tensile does not hold hold if the Cabernet is thin. sent13: that the bathrobe is not a cylinder and is tensile does not hold. sent14: if something is a kind of a taipan then it does jam stoker. sent15: if the Cabernet is tensile the sporangium does thin. sent16: if the fact that something jams featherfoil is not incorrect then it is tensile. sent17: something that is not thin and not a cylinder does not jam stoker. sent18: if something is a cylinder then it does jam featherfoil. sent19: if the bathrobe jams featherfoil then the multiflora is a taipan. sent20: the multiflora thins if the Cabernet does jam stoker. sent21: if something does not blanket rofecoxib it is a kind of a Ephesians that does jam diapason. sent22: the bathrobe is a cylinder if the sporangium is not tensile. sent23: if the Cabernet is Ephesians the sporangium is not a taipan and does not jam featherfoil. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cabernet is thin.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sporangium is non-asyndetic thing that is tensile is not true.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the bathrobe is a kind of a cylinder.; sent18 -> int3: the fact that the bathrobe does not jam featherfoil is incorrect if that it is a kind of a cylinder is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bathrobe jams featherfoil.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the multiflora is a kind of a taipan.; sent14 -> int6: if the multiflora is a kind of a taipan then it jams stoker.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the multiflora jams stoker.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__