the flocculation is a Serrasalmus.
sent1: that the flocculation is not a kind of a libertine and/or is a compartment is false if the leadwort is a Serrasalmus. sent2: if there is something such that it does mint and/or it does not manhandle murrain the housekeeper is a photograph. sent3: the fact that the planchet does not participate and/or it does discountenance Scolytus is incorrect. sent4: if that the egalitarian is not somatosensory and it is not limnological does not hold then it is limnological. sent5: something is a Serrasalmus if the fact that it is not a kind of a natural and is calcitic does not hold. sent6: the egalitarian does not putty. sent7: the speedskater photographs if the housekeeper photographs. sent8: the flocculation is not a Serrasalmus if there is something such that that it does not participate or does discountenance Scolytus or both is wrong. sent9: the fact that something is not somatosensory and it is non-limnological is incorrect if it is not a putty. sent10: something does mint if it is a small. sent11: if the speedskater does photograph then that the leadwort is a kind of non-natural thing that is calcitic is not true. sent12: the brassard is a kind of a small if the egalitarian is limnological.
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does not participate and/or it discountenances Scolytus is not right.; int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it is not a libertine and/or is a compartment does not hold.
sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the leadwort is not a natural but it is calcitic is not true then it is a Serrasalmus.; sent10 -> int3: if the brassard is a small it is a mint.; sent9 -> int4: that the egalitarian is non-somatosensory thing that is not limnological is false if it is not a putty.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the egalitarian is not somatosensory and it is not limnological is false.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the egalitarian is limnological.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the brassard is a small.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the brassard does mint.; int8 -> int9: the brassard is a mint or it does not manhandle murrain or both.; int9 -> int10: something is a mint and/or does not manhandle murrain.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the housekeeper does photograph.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the speedskater is a kind of a photograph.; sent11 & int12 -> int13: that the leadwort is not natural and is calcitic is false.; int2 & int13 -> int14: the leadwort is a Serrasalmus.; sent1 & int14 -> int15: the fact that either the flocculation is not a libertine or it is a compartment or both does not hold.; int15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the flocculation is a Serrasalmus. ; $context$ = sent1: that the flocculation is not a kind of a libertine and/or is a compartment is false if the leadwort is a Serrasalmus. sent2: if there is something such that it does mint and/or it does not manhandle murrain the housekeeper is a photograph. sent3: the fact that the planchet does not participate and/or it does discountenance Scolytus is incorrect. sent4: if that the egalitarian is not somatosensory and it is not limnological does not hold then it is limnological. sent5: something is a Serrasalmus if the fact that it is not a kind of a natural and is calcitic does not hold. sent6: the egalitarian does not putty. sent7: the speedskater photographs if the housekeeper photographs. sent8: the flocculation is not a Serrasalmus if there is something such that that it does not participate or does discountenance Scolytus or both is wrong. sent9: the fact that something is not somatosensory and it is non-limnological is incorrect if it is not a putty. sent10: something does mint if it is a small. sent11: if the speedskater does photograph then that the leadwort is a kind of non-natural thing that is calcitic is not true. sent12: the brassard is a kind of a small if the egalitarian is limnological. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does not participate and/or it discountenances Scolytus is not right.; int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__