the cresol does mystify accordance.
sent1: that the lifeline is both not a Alger and antediluvian is not right if something does not void. sent2: that the spongefly is blue-collar thing that is a stylet does not hold. sent3: if the spongefly is not a Rain-giver then that the cresol is unsalable thing that does mystify accordance does not hold. sent4: something that is not a Rain-giver is not unsalable or is not a semidarkness or both. sent5: something is a Alger. sent6: something does mystify accordance if that it is not a kind of a stylet and is topographical is false. sent7: if something that is not a stylet is topographical then that it is not a Rain-giver is not false. sent8: something does not mystify accordance if that it is unsalable and it mystify accordance is incorrect. sent9: the spongefly is blue-collar and it is aesthetics if there is something such that it is a Alger. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Alger and is a antediluvian does not hold then the kingfish is not an aesthetics. sent11: the fact that the goatsbeard is a kind of a tepee that is Churchillian is not right. sent12: the goatsbeard is not a void if the fact that it is both a tepee and Churchillian is not correct.
sent7 -> int1: the cresol is not a Rain-giver if it is not a stylet but topographical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cresol is not a stylet but topographical.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cresol is not a Rain-giver.; sent4 -> int3: if the cresol is not a Rain-giver it is not unsalable or not a semidarkness or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cresol is not unsalable and/or it is not a kind of a semidarkness.; int4 -> int5: something is not unsalable or it is not a semidarkness or both.; sent5 & sent9 -> int6: the spongefly is blue-collar thing that is an aesthetics.; int6 -> int7: the spongefly is blue-collar.; sent6 -> int8: the cresol mystifies accordance if that it is not a stylet and is topographical does not hold.;
the cresol does not mystify accordance.
sent8 -> int9: if that the cresol is unsalable and it mystifies accordance is not correct it does not mystifies accordance.; sent12 & sent11 -> int10: the goatsbeard does not void.; int10 -> int11: something is not a kind of a void.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the fact that that the lifeline is not a Alger but a antediluvian does not hold is not incorrect.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Alger and is a antediluvian is false.; int13 & sent10 -> int14: the kingfish is not an aesthetics.; int14 -> int15: something is not an aesthetics.;
$hypothesis$ = the cresol does mystify accordance. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lifeline is both not a Alger and antediluvian is not right if something does not void. sent2: that the spongefly is blue-collar thing that is a stylet does not hold. sent3: if the spongefly is not a Rain-giver then that the cresol is unsalable thing that does mystify accordance does not hold. sent4: something that is not a Rain-giver is not unsalable or is not a semidarkness or both. sent5: something is a Alger. sent6: something does mystify accordance if that it is not a kind of a stylet and is topographical is false. sent7: if something that is not a stylet is topographical then that it is not a Rain-giver is not false. sent8: something does not mystify accordance if that it is unsalable and it mystify accordance is incorrect. sent9: the spongefly is blue-collar and it is aesthetics if there is something such that it is a Alger. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Alger and is a antediluvian does not hold then the kingfish is not an aesthetics. sent11: the fact that the goatsbeard is a kind of a tepee that is Churchillian is not right. sent12: the goatsbeard is not a void if the fact that it is both a tepee and Churchillian is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the cresol is not a Rain-giver if it is not a stylet but topographical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cresol is not a stylet but topographical.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cresol is not a Rain-giver.; sent4 -> int3: if the cresol is not a Rain-giver it is not unsalable or not a semidarkness or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cresol is not unsalable and/or it is not a kind of a semidarkness.; int4 -> int5: something is not unsalable or it is not a semidarkness or both.; sent5 & sent9 -> int6: the spongefly is blue-collar thing that is an aesthetics.; int6 -> int7: the spongefly is blue-collar.; sent6 -> int8: the cresol mystifies accordance if that it is not a stylet and is topographical does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__