there are unknowable things.
sent1: something is knowable. sent2: if the fact that something is not a laugh is true that it is knowable but not a Pulicidae does not hold. sent3: there is something such that that the fact that it does bog denominationalism and it is a kind of a Buteo hold is not right. sent4: if there exists something such that that it does bog denominationalism and it is a Buteo does not hold then the mimeograph is not a Buteo. sent5: if the mimeograph is not a Buteo then it is unproductive and it is a retardation. sent6: something does not laugh. sent7: if something is not subclavian then it is not a kind of a nape and it is not a Cistus. sent8: if there exists something such that it is unproductive and is a retardation then the peridium does not bog grail. sent9: the interlayer is a Pulicidae. sent10: the interlayer is a nape if there is something such that it does not laugh. sent11: the fact that the interlayer is not knowable if the interlayer is subclavian and it is a Pulicidae is correct. sent12: there is something such that it does laugh.
sent7 -> int1: if the interlayer is not subclavian then that it is not a nape and it is not a Cistus is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the interlayer is not subclavian is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the interlayer is not a nape and not a Cistus.; int2 -> int3: the interlayer is not a kind of a nape.; sent6 & sent10 -> int4: the interlayer is a nape.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the interlayer is subclavian.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the interlayer is subclavian and it is a Pulicidae.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the interlayer is not knowable.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the funeral-residence is not subclavian.
sent2 -> int9: if the funeral-residence does not laugh then that it is knowable thing that is not a kind of a Pulicidae does not hold.; sent3 & sent4 -> int10: the mimeograph is not a Buteo.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the mimeograph is unproductive and is a retardation.; int11 -> int12: something is unproductive and it is a retardation.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: the peridium does not bog grail.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it does not bog grail.;
$hypothesis$ = there are unknowable things. ; $context$ = sent1: something is knowable. sent2: if the fact that something is not a laugh is true that it is knowable but not a Pulicidae does not hold. sent3: there is something such that that the fact that it does bog denominationalism and it is a kind of a Buteo hold is not right. sent4: if there exists something such that that it does bog denominationalism and it is a Buteo does not hold then the mimeograph is not a Buteo. sent5: if the mimeograph is not a Buteo then it is unproductive and it is a retardation. sent6: something does not laugh. sent7: if something is not subclavian then it is not a kind of a nape and it is not a Cistus. sent8: if there exists something such that it is unproductive and is a retardation then the peridium does not bog grail. sent9: the interlayer is a Pulicidae. sent10: the interlayer is a nape if there is something such that it does not laugh. sent11: the fact that the interlayer is not knowable if the interlayer is subclavian and it is a Pulicidae is correct. sent12: there is something such that it does laugh. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the interlayer is not subclavian then that it is not a nape and it is not a Cistus is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the interlayer is not subclavian is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the interlayer is not a nape and not a Cistus.; int2 -> int3: the interlayer is not a kind of a nape.; sent6 & sent10 -> int4: the interlayer is a nape.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the interlayer is subclavian.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the interlayer is subclavian and it is a Pulicidae.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the interlayer is not knowable.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__