that if the swapping dybbuk occurs then the gastrostomy does not occur and the Danish does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the Danishness does not occur. sent2: if the gastrostomy occurs then the fact that the nonconformity and the illegitimateness happens is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the ruminating and the non-providentness happens does not hold if that the Incarnation occurs hold. sent4: the swapping Exodus happens if that both the nonconformity and the non-illegitimateness happens is not true. sent5: the fact that the balsamicness but not the reciprocation occurs is not correct. sent6: if the gastrostomy happens that the fact that the nonconformity but not the illegitimateness occurs is not false does not hold. sent7: either the singling dimorphism or that the swapping Exodus happens or both results in that the swapping dybbuk does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the gastrostomy happens.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: that both the nonconformity and the non-illegitimateness occurs is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the swapping Exodus happens.; int2 -> int3: the singling dimorphism and/or the swapping Exodus occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the swapping dybbuk does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the swapping dybbuk happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the gastrostomy does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the gastrostomy does not occur and the Danishness does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the swapping dybbuk occurs then the gastrostomy does not occur and the Danish does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Danishness does not occur. sent2: if the gastrostomy occurs then the fact that the nonconformity and the illegitimateness happens is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the ruminating and the non-providentness happens does not hold if that the Incarnation occurs hold. sent4: the swapping Exodus happens if that both the nonconformity and the non-illegitimateness happens is not true. sent5: the fact that the balsamicness but not the reciprocation occurs is not correct. sent6: if the gastrostomy happens that the fact that the nonconformity but not the illegitimateness occurs is not false does not hold. sent7: either the singling dimorphism or that the swapping Exodus happens or both results in that the swapping dybbuk does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the gastrostomy happens.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: that both the nonconformity and the non-illegitimateness occurs is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the swapping Exodus happens.; int2 -> int3: the singling dimorphism and/or the swapping Exodus occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the swapping dybbuk does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the swapping dybbuk happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the gastrostomy does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the gastrostomy does not occur and the Danishness does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__