the blueing Istiophoridae happens.
sent1: the transiting does not occur. sent2: if that not the creativeness but the reducing occurs does not hold that the reducing does not occur is not false. sent3: that both the blueing Istiophoridae and the reducing occurs is triggered by the non-creativeness. sent4: that the powdering sporophore does not occur triggers that the pegging does not occur but the self-destruction happens. sent5: if the peg does not occur the fact that not the do-si-do but the alopecicness occurs does not hold. sent6: the paperwork occurs. sent7: if either the memorializing Guyana does not occur or the follies does not occur or both the creativeness does not occur. sent8: the fact that not the creativeness but the reducing happens is not correct. sent9: if the blueing Istiophoridae happens then the reducing happens. sent10: if the fact that the do-si-do does not occur and the alopecicness occurs is not true then the alopecicness does not occur. sent11: that the memorializing Guyana does not occur and/or the follies does not occur is triggered by the non-alopecicness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blueing Istiophoridae occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the reducing occurs hold.; sent2 & sent8 -> int2: the reducing does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the blueing Istiophoridae occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the blueing Istiophoridae happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the transiting does not occur. sent2: if that not the creativeness but the reducing occurs does not hold that the reducing does not occur is not false. sent3: that both the blueing Istiophoridae and the reducing occurs is triggered by the non-creativeness. sent4: that the powdering sporophore does not occur triggers that the pegging does not occur but the self-destruction happens. sent5: if the peg does not occur the fact that not the do-si-do but the alopecicness occurs does not hold. sent6: the paperwork occurs. sent7: if either the memorializing Guyana does not occur or the follies does not occur or both the creativeness does not occur. sent8: the fact that not the creativeness but the reducing happens is not correct. sent9: if the blueing Istiophoridae happens then the reducing happens. sent10: if the fact that the do-si-do does not occur and the alopecicness occurs is not true then the alopecicness does not occur. sent11: that the memorializing Guyana does not occur and/or the follies does not occur is triggered by the non-alopecicness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blueing Istiophoridae occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the reducing occurs hold.; sent2 & sent8 -> int2: the reducing does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__