the fact that there exists something such that if it does not adhere roadhouse and it is not a kind of a capriole then that it is not a mandrake is not wrong does not hold.
sent1: if the Sauk does not adhere roadhouse and it is not a capriole then it is not a mandrake. sent2: there is something such that if it is big and is not a superstition then it does not fret Vuillard. sent3: the nucleosynthesis is not shapely if that it is both aboriginal and not burglarious hold. sent4: the Sauk does not rede knickknack if it is not a Negaprion and is not uncompassionate. sent5: the Sauk does capriole if it does not adhere Varese and it does not devolve. sent6: the fact that there is something such that if it does fret prancer and it is not lossless then it does not rede boutique is correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a superstition but osteal then it does not fret reproducibility. sent8: the Sauk is a kind of a capriole if it is not a right-hander and it is not a warden. sent9: there exists something such that if it does adhere roadhouse and it does not capriole then that it is a kind of a mandrake does not hold. sent10: if something is not uncompassionate and it is not homocercal it is not a capriole. sent11: the Sauk does not rede flow if that it does not adhere roadhouse and it adheres harlequin is true. sent12: the knickknack is a kind of a mailman if it is not an ox and is not a kind of an audible. sent13: there is something such that if it does not rede headway and it is a kind of a bellow it does not shoo Sauk. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not adhere roadhouse and caprioles then it is not a mandrake. sent15: the harlequin is non-national if it is soluble thing that is not a Jansen. sent16: the Sauk is a kind of a mandrake if it does not adhere roadhouse and it is not a capriole. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not Rembrandtesque and it is not airworthy then it is not unobvious. sent18: the Sauk is a surpliced if it is not a kind of a Roentgen and does not capriole.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
the prancer does not capriole if it is not uncompassionate and is not homocercal.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not adhere roadhouse and it is not a kind of a capriole then that it is not a mandrake is not wrong does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Sauk does not adhere roadhouse and it is not a capriole then it is not a mandrake. sent2: there is something such that if it is big and is not a superstition then it does not fret Vuillard. sent3: the nucleosynthesis is not shapely if that it is both aboriginal and not burglarious hold. sent4: the Sauk does not rede knickknack if it is not a Negaprion and is not uncompassionate. sent5: the Sauk does capriole if it does not adhere Varese and it does not devolve. sent6: the fact that there is something such that if it does fret prancer and it is not lossless then it does not rede boutique is correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a superstition but osteal then it does not fret reproducibility. sent8: the Sauk is a kind of a capriole if it is not a right-hander and it is not a warden. sent9: there exists something such that if it does adhere roadhouse and it does not capriole then that it is a kind of a mandrake does not hold. sent10: if something is not uncompassionate and it is not homocercal it is not a capriole. sent11: the Sauk does not rede flow if that it does not adhere roadhouse and it adheres harlequin is true. sent12: the knickknack is a kind of a mailman if it is not an ox and is not a kind of an audible. sent13: there is something such that if it does not rede headway and it is a kind of a bellow it does not shoo Sauk. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not adhere roadhouse and caprioles then it is not a mandrake. sent15: the harlequin is non-national if it is soluble thing that is not a Jansen. sent16: the Sauk is a kind of a mandrake if it does not adhere roadhouse and it is not a capriole. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not Rembrandtesque and it is not airworthy then it is not unobvious. sent18: the Sauk is a surpliced if it is not a kind of a Roentgen and does not capriole. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__