the fact that the bitter does bedizen isochrone and it is maladroit is false.
sent1: the incarnation is nonsectarian thing that does fit Emmy. sent2: that the Kern is not acroscopic and/or it does contort Pascal is wrong if the fact that the viscount is a knife is right. sent3: the councilwoman is comparable if something does fit Emmy. sent4: that the troubleshooter is not nonsectarian and it is not decisive is false if the Kern is not an inaugural. sent5: if something fits Emmy then that it is comparable and it is not unassertive does not hold. sent6: the bitter is psychoanalytical. sent7: the bitter does bedizen isochrone and it fits Emmy if the fact that the troubleshooter is non-maladroit is correct. sent8: that the incarnation is non-comparable thing that is unassertive is wrong. sent9: if something does fit Emmy then that it is both incomparable and not assertive is false. sent10: the fact that the incarnation is comparable and is not unassertive is not right. sent11: if something does fit Emmy then the fact that it is both not comparable and not unassertive is not right. sent12: the Kern does not fit Emmy if the viscount does not fit Emmy. sent13: the viscount does knife. sent14: if that the fact that something is not acroscopic or it does contort Pascal or both is not false does not hold that it is not inaugural is true. sent15: everything is both not non-maladroit and psychoanalytical. sent16: if the fact that something is not nonsectarian and it is not decisive is incorrect then it is psychoanalytical. sent17: that the bitter bedizens isochrone hold if the fact that the incarnation is incomparable but not unassertive does not hold.
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the incarnation is a kind of non-comparable thing that is not unassertive hold is false if it does fit Emmy.; sent1 -> int2: the incarnation fits Emmy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the incarnation is incomparable thing that is assertive does not hold.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the bitter does bedizen isochrone.; sent15 -> int5: the bitter is maladroit and psychoanalytical.; int5 -> int6: the bitter is maladroit.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the councilwoman is comparable.
sent16 -> int7: the fact that the troubleshooter is psychoanalytical is not incorrect if the fact that it is not nonsectarian and is not decisive is not correct.; sent14 -> int8: the Kern is not an inaugural if that it is not acroscopic or does contort Pascal or both is not right.; sent2 & sent13 -> int9: that the Kern is not acroscopic and/or does contort Pascal is incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the Kern is not inaugural.; sent4 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the troubleshooter is not nonsectarian and is not decisive is not true.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the troubleshooter is psychoanalytical is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bitter does bedizen isochrone and it is maladroit is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the incarnation is nonsectarian thing that does fit Emmy. sent2: that the Kern is not acroscopic and/or it does contort Pascal is wrong if the fact that the viscount is a knife is right. sent3: the councilwoman is comparable if something does fit Emmy. sent4: that the troubleshooter is not nonsectarian and it is not decisive is false if the Kern is not an inaugural. sent5: if something fits Emmy then that it is comparable and it is not unassertive does not hold. sent6: the bitter is psychoanalytical. sent7: the bitter does bedizen isochrone and it fits Emmy if the fact that the troubleshooter is non-maladroit is correct. sent8: that the incarnation is non-comparable thing that is unassertive is wrong. sent9: if something does fit Emmy then that it is both incomparable and not assertive is false. sent10: the fact that the incarnation is comparable and is not unassertive is not right. sent11: if something does fit Emmy then the fact that it is both not comparable and not unassertive is not right. sent12: the Kern does not fit Emmy if the viscount does not fit Emmy. sent13: the viscount does knife. sent14: if that the fact that something is not acroscopic or it does contort Pascal or both is not false does not hold that it is not inaugural is true. sent15: everything is both not non-maladroit and psychoanalytical. sent16: if the fact that something is not nonsectarian and it is not decisive is incorrect then it is psychoanalytical. sent17: that the bitter bedizens isochrone hold if the fact that the incarnation is incomparable but not unassertive does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the incarnation is a kind of non-comparable thing that is not unassertive hold is false if it does fit Emmy.; sent1 -> int2: the incarnation fits Emmy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the incarnation is incomparable thing that is assertive does not hold.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the bitter does bedizen isochrone.; sent15 -> int5: the bitter is maladroit and psychoanalytical.; int5 -> int6: the bitter is maladroit.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__