the fact that the serape is voluble and is not determinate is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the serape is voluble but it is not determinate is false if the waterfront is not determinate. sent2: if something is not unfamiliar the waterfront is not a kind of a scandal and does not wire mosaicism. sent3: if the waterfront is not a scandal but it wires mosaicism then that it is not determinate hold. sent4: there exists something such that it is not unfamiliar. sent5: that the serape is not non-voluble and it is determinate does not hold. sent6: if something is unfamiliar it is voluble.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the waterfront is not a scandal and it does not wire mosaicism.;
the serape is both not non-voluble and indeterminate.
sent6 -> int2: if the serape is unfamiliar it is voluble.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the serape is voluble and is not determinate is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the serape is voluble but it is not determinate is false if the waterfront is not determinate. sent2: if something is not unfamiliar the waterfront is not a kind of a scandal and does not wire mosaicism. sent3: if the waterfront is not a scandal but it wires mosaicism then that it is not determinate hold. sent4: there exists something such that it is not unfamiliar. sent5: that the serape is not non-voluble and it is determinate does not hold. sent6: if something is unfamiliar it is voluble. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the waterfront is not a scandal and it does not wire mosaicism.; __UNKNOWN__