there is something such that if it does not shrink installation and is a shadiness it is nosocomial.
sent1: if a non-Panamanian thing does nestle it is indecorous. sent2: the clinic is nosocomial if it does shrink installation and is a shadiness. sent3: if something that does shrink installation is a kind of a shadiness then it is nosocomial. sent4: there is something such that if it shrinks installation and is a shadiness it is nosocomial. sent5: if something is not a Dracocephalum but it is dimorphic the fact that it is a jiao hold. sent6: if something is not a kind of a improvidence and is a kind of a kitbag it is a casserole. sent7: something is a hematocolpometra if that it does not murmur Farrell and it is circulatory is not wrong. sent8: that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Sisyridae that shrinks mandible the fact that it is enzymatic hold hold. sent9: the fact that the clinic is nosocomial is correct if it tames schipperke and it is loamy. sent10: if something does not shrink installation but it is a shadiness then it is nosocomial. sent11: there exists something such that if it is both oleaceous and enzymatic the fact that it murmurs valvule is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a paddle and is prismatic it is a hematocolpometra. sent13: if something that is not a Plovdiv is a improvidence then it does shrink Mbabane. sent14: if the mandible does not tame Uropsilus but it is actinic then it is a shadiness. sent15: if something is limbic and it is genealogic then it fiddles. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a wired and it is a ergotropism then it is diametric.
sent10 -> int1: if the clinic does not shrink installation but it is a kind of a shadiness then it is nosocomial.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not shrink installation and is a shadiness it is nosocomial. ; $context$ = sent1: if a non-Panamanian thing does nestle it is indecorous. sent2: the clinic is nosocomial if it does shrink installation and is a shadiness. sent3: if something that does shrink installation is a kind of a shadiness then it is nosocomial. sent4: there is something such that if it shrinks installation and is a shadiness it is nosocomial. sent5: if something is not a Dracocephalum but it is dimorphic the fact that it is a jiao hold. sent6: if something is not a kind of a improvidence and is a kind of a kitbag it is a casserole. sent7: something is a hematocolpometra if that it does not murmur Farrell and it is circulatory is not wrong. sent8: that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Sisyridae that shrinks mandible the fact that it is enzymatic hold hold. sent9: the fact that the clinic is nosocomial is correct if it tames schipperke and it is loamy. sent10: if something does not shrink installation but it is a shadiness then it is nosocomial. sent11: there exists something such that if it is both oleaceous and enzymatic the fact that it murmurs valvule is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a paddle and is prismatic it is a hematocolpometra. sent13: if something that is not a Plovdiv is a improvidence then it does shrink Mbabane. sent14: if the mandible does not tame Uropsilus but it is actinic then it is a shadiness. sent15: if something is limbic and it is genealogic then it fiddles. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a wired and it is a ergotropism then it is diametric. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the clinic does not shrink installation but it is a kind of a shadiness then it is nosocomial.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__