the studio permits Calvinist.
sent1: if something is a hipbone it does permit Calvinist. sent2: the CD4 does stigmatize hornwort. sent3: the studio rivets and it is a broil. sent4: the CD4 is extropic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not boot prude and it is not a bolivar is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it does not boot prude and is not a bolivar is wrong. sent6: if the snailflower is not nonsyllabic it is backward thing that boots CD4. sent7: if the CD4 is cursorial it is a hipbone. sent8: The hornwort does stigmatize CD4. sent9: if there is something such that that it is both not cursorial and not orbital is not correct the CD4 is cursorial. sent10: that the studio is not cursorial and it is not orbital is incorrect if the fact that it is not backward is right. sent11: if the fact that the CD4 is not a rivet is not wrong then the studio permits Calvinist and is a rivet. sent12: the CD4 does not stigmatize hornwort if it is a kind of extropic thing that is a kind of a rivet. sent13: the studio is not backward if the snailflower is backward and it boots CD4. sent14: the snailflower is not nonsyllabic. sent15: the moray is not a kind of a bolivar if it is extropic.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the CD4 is extropic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the CD4 is a kind of a rivet.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the CD4 is extropic and is a rivet.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the CD4 does not stigmatize hornwort is not incorrect.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the CD4 is not a kind of a rivet.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the studio permits Calvinist and it is a rivet.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the moray is not a bolivar.
sent1 -> int7: if the CD4 is a hipbone it permits Calvinist.; sent6 & sent14 -> int8: the snailflower is backward and it boots CD4.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the studio is not backward.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: that the studio is both not cursorial and not orbital is false.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that the fact that it is a kind of non-cursorial thing that is not orbital hold is wrong.; int11 & sent9 -> int12: the CD4 is cursorial.; sent7 & int12 -> int13: the CD4 is a hipbone.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the CD4 does permit Calvinist.;
$hypothesis$ = the studio permits Calvinist. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a hipbone it does permit Calvinist. sent2: the CD4 does stigmatize hornwort. sent3: the studio rivets and it is a broil. sent4: the CD4 is extropic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not boot prude and it is not a bolivar is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it does not boot prude and is not a bolivar is wrong. sent6: if the snailflower is not nonsyllabic it is backward thing that boots CD4. sent7: if the CD4 is cursorial it is a hipbone. sent8: The hornwort does stigmatize CD4. sent9: if there is something such that that it is both not cursorial and not orbital is not correct the CD4 is cursorial. sent10: that the studio is not cursorial and it is not orbital is incorrect if the fact that it is not backward is right. sent11: if the fact that the CD4 is not a rivet is not wrong then the studio permits Calvinist and is a rivet. sent12: the CD4 does not stigmatize hornwort if it is a kind of extropic thing that is a kind of a rivet. sent13: the studio is not backward if the snailflower is backward and it boots CD4. sent14: the snailflower is not nonsyllabic. sent15: the moray is not a kind of a bolivar if it is extropic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the CD4 is extropic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the CD4 is a kind of a rivet.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the CD4 is extropic and is a rivet.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the CD4 does not stigmatize hornwort is not incorrect.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the CD4 is not a kind of a rivet.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the studio permits Calvinist and it is a rivet.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__