the lookdown does design sateen.
sent1: the fact that the bat is classificatory or not minor or both is false if the moonwort is colorless. sent2: the sateen is a moray. sent3: something is equestrian and/or it does not morph. sent4: there exists something such that that it is either inaccessible or a Hearst or both does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is colorless hold if it is a kind of a moray. sent6: if that the bat is classificatory is correct then it is a kawaka. sent7: the moonwort is classificatory. sent8: the fact that the lookdown is a kawaka and/or it does not design sateen is wrong if the risotto is a moray. sent9: the lookdown is minor. sent10: something is not returnable. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is minor and/or it does not design sateen does not hold. sent12: that the bat is a dolichocephaly or it is not a degeneration or both is not true. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a ostomy. sent14: the moonwort is a moray if the risotto is a kind of a kawaka. sent15: the fact that either the bat is classificatory or it does not design sateen or both does not hold. sent16: the risotto is colorless. sent17: that the bat is classificatory or not a moray or both is not right if the moonwort is colorless. sent18: the risotto is a kawaka. sent19: there is something such that it is not anguine. sent20: the moonwort is colorless if it designs sateen. sent21: the lookdown is a kind of a kawaka.
sent14 & sent18 -> int1: the moonwort is a moray.; sent5 -> int2: if the moonwort is a moray it is colorless.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the moonwort is colorless is right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the bat is classificatory or it is not minor or both is not true.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is classificatory or not minor or both is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the lookdown does design sateen. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bat is classificatory or not minor or both is false if the moonwort is colorless. sent2: the sateen is a moray. sent3: something is equestrian and/or it does not morph. sent4: there exists something such that that it is either inaccessible or a Hearst or both does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is colorless hold if it is a kind of a moray. sent6: if that the bat is classificatory is correct then it is a kawaka. sent7: the moonwort is classificatory. sent8: the fact that the lookdown is a kawaka and/or it does not design sateen is wrong if the risotto is a moray. sent9: the lookdown is minor. sent10: something is not returnable. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is minor and/or it does not design sateen does not hold. sent12: that the bat is a dolichocephaly or it is not a degeneration or both is not true. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a ostomy. sent14: the moonwort is a moray if the risotto is a kind of a kawaka. sent15: the fact that either the bat is classificatory or it does not design sateen or both does not hold. sent16: the risotto is colorless. sent17: that the bat is classificatory or not a moray or both is not right if the moonwort is colorless. sent18: the risotto is a kawaka. sent19: there is something such that it is not anguine. sent20: the moonwort is colorless if it designs sateen. sent21: the lookdown is a kind of a kawaka. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent18 -> int1: the moonwort is a moray.; sent5 -> int2: if the moonwort is a moray it is colorless.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the moonwort is colorless is right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the bat is classificatory or it is not minor or both is not true.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is classificatory or not minor or both is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__