the nondevelopment is not a bratwurst.
sent1: if the fact that the nondevelopment is a kind of an admiralty and it is a bratwurst is not correct then it is not a Zagreb. sent2: the fact that something is not insectivorous and it is not a Nebraskan does not hold if it is not a Sinology. sent3: if the yoke does not liquefy centrality but it is a kind of a gidgee the coffeeberry does not liquefy centrality. sent4: that the nondevelopment does raven Coregonus and it does liquefy Ariidae is not true. sent5: if the fact that something ravens Coregonus and does liquefy Ariidae is not right then it is not a bratwurst. sent6: the orthicon is not a wristwatch if the coffeeberry does not evade but it is cacodylic. sent7: something does not evade but it is cacodylic if it does not liquefy centrality. sent8: that the narrow is a kind of a cuisine and it is a bratwurst is false. sent9: that the orthicon is not bistroic hold if the fact that the signore is bistroic and it is not non-pharmacological is not right. sent10: the fact that the quadruplet is not a bratwurst is right. sent11: that the yoke does mush Prussian hold. sent12: if that something is a kind of a chachalaca and is unregenerate is not true it is not craniometric. sent13: the yoke does not liquefy centrality but it is a gidgee if it mushes Prussian. sent14: the nondevelopment is not a Sinology if the dominion is mammary. sent15: there are non-pharmacological things. sent16: that if that something is not insectivorous and not a Nebraskan is false it is a bratwurst is right. sent17: if something does not liquefy Ariidae then it is not a kind of a bratwurst.
sent5 -> int1: if that the nondevelopment ravens Coregonus and does liquefy Ariidae is not correct then it is not a bratwurst.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the nondevelopment is a bratwurst.
sent16 -> int2: the nondevelopment is a kind of a bratwurst if the fact that it is non-insectivorous and it is not a Nebraskan is not right.; sent2 -> int3: that the nondevelopment is a kind of non-insectivorous thing that is not a Nebraskan is not true if it is not a Sinology.; sent7 -> int4: the coffeeberry does not evade and is cacodylic if it does not liquefy centrality.; sent13 & sent11 -> int5: the yoke does not liquefy centrality and is a gidgee.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the coffeeberry does not liquefy centrality.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the coffeeberry does not evade but it is cacodylic.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the orthicon is not a wristwatch is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the nondevelopment is not a bratwurst. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the nondevelopment is a kind of an admiralty and it is a bratwurst is not correct then it is not a Zagreb. sent2: the fact that something is not insectivorous and it is not a Nebraskan does not hold if it is not a Sinology. sent3: if the yoke does not liquefy centrality but it is a kind of a gidgee the coffeeberry does not liquefy centrality. sent4: that the nondevelopment does raven Coregonus and it does liquefy Ariidae is not true. sent5: if the fact that something ravens Coregonus and does liquefy Ariidae is not right then it is not a bratwurst. sent6: the orthicon is not a wristwatch if the coffeeberry does not evade but it is cacodylic. sent7: something does not evade but it is cacodylic if it does not liquefy centrality. sent8: that the narrow is a kind of a cuisine and it is a bratwurst is false. sent9: that the orthicon is not bistroic hold if the fact that the signore is bistroic and it is not non-pharmacological is not right. sent10: the fact that the quadruplet is not a bratwurst is right. sent11: that the yoke does mush Prussian hold. sent12: if that something is a kind of a chachalaca and is unregenerate is not true it is not craniometric. sent13: the yoke does not liquefy centrality but it is a gidgee if it mushes Prussian. sent14: the nondevelopment is not a Sinology if the dominion is mammary. sent15: there are non-pharmacological things. sent16: that if that something is not insectivorous and not a Nebraskan is false it is a bratwurst is right. sent17: if something does not liquefy Ariidae then it is not a kind of a bratwurst. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if that the nondevelopment ravens Coregonus and does liquefy Ariidae is not correct then it is not a bratwurst.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__