the isolation is invitational.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a kind of a vestal and it is not a flooring. sent2: if the additive is a Lander that it is a stockjobber is not wrong. sent3: something is invitational if it is a wrack. sent4: the iodine does love if the malope is not a kind of a backhanded. sent5: the additive is invitational if there exists something such that that it is both a stockjobber and not invitational is not correct. sent6: the additive is a stockjobber if the iodine does love. sent7: the additive is invitational. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a flooring the additive is a kind of a flooring. sent9: if the malope is not a love but a backhanded then the isolation is not invitational. sent10: there is something such that that it is a vestal and it is not a flooring does not hold. sent11: the demineralization is nonadhesive. sent12: if something is a kind of a flooring then it is nonadhesive. sent13: if there exists something such that it is nonadhesive and a wrack then the isolation is invitational. sent14: the fact that the malope is nonadhesive is true. sent15: something is a kind of a wrack if it is a kind of a stockjobber. sent16: something is a kind of invitational a wrack. sent17: the malope is non-backhanded.
sent4 & sent17 -> int1: that the iodine is a kind of a love hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the additive is a kind of a stockjobber.; sent15 -> int3: if the additive is a stockjobber that it is a wrack is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the additive is a wrack.; sent12 -> int5: that the additive is nonadhesive is not false if it is a flooring.;
the isolation is not invitational.
$hypothesis$ = the isolation is invitational. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a kind of a vestal and it is not a flooring. sent2: if the additive is a Lander that it is a stockjobber is not wrong. sent3: something is invitational if it is a wrack. sent4: the iodine does love if the malope is not a kind of a backhanded. sent5: the additive is invitational if there exists something such that that it is both a stockjobber and not invitational is not correct. sent6: the additive is a stockjobber if the iodine does love. sent7: the additive is invitational. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a flooring the additive is a kind of a flooring. sent9: if the malope is not a love but a backhanded then the isolation is not invitational. sent10: there is something such that that it is a vestal and it is not a flooring does not hold. sent11: the demineralization is nonadhesive. sent12: if something is a kind of a flooring then it is nonadhesive. sent13: if there exists something such that it is nonadhesive and a wrack then the isolation is invitational. sent14: the fact that the malope is nonadhesive is true. sent15: something is a kind of a wrack if it is a kind of a stockjobber. sent16: something is a kind of invitational a wrack. sent17: the malope is non-backhanded. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent17 -> int1: that the iodine is a kind of a love hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the additive is a kind of a stockjobber.; sent15 -> int3: if the additive is a stockjobber that it is a wrack is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the additive is a wrack.; sent12 -> int5: that the additive is nonadhesive is not false if it is a flooring.; __UNKNOWN__