the vermouth is a turmeric.
sent1: the fact that if the aftermath is denotative and it uncoils sidewall the sidewall is not branchless is not incorrect. sent2: if that something harangues revival but it does not upload dockyard is wrong it is not a turmeric. sent3: That the aliyah does not harangue predecessor is not incorrect. sent4: that the predecessor does not harangue aliyah is not incorrect. sent5: if something that does not harangue aliyah does not uncoil spokeswoman it does upload dockyard. sent6: the fact that something is a turmeric is correct if it is a speaker. sent7: if something is not a speaker then that it harangues revival and does not upload dockyard is not right. sent8: the vermouth is a switchboard and saxicolous if the sidewall is not branchless. sent9: if the predecessor uploads dockyard then the sidewall harangues revival. sent10: if something is saxicolous it is not a speaker. sent11: the predecessor does not uncoil spokeswoman. sent12: The spokeswoman does not uncoil predecessor.
sent5 -> int1: if the predecessor does not harangue aliyah and it does not uncoil spokeswoman then that it uploads dockyard is not wrong.; sent4 & sent11 -> int2: the predecessor does not harangue aliyah and does not uncoil spokeswoman.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the predecessor uploads dockyard.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the sidewall does harangue revival.; sent6 -> int5: if the vermouth is a kind of a speaker it is a kind of a turmeric.;
the vermouth is not a turmeric.
sent2 -> int6: the vermouth is not a kind of a turmeric if the fact that it harangues revival and does not upload dockyard is not true.; sent7 -> int7: that the vermouth does harangue revival and does not upload dockyard is not right if it is not a speaker.; sent10 -> int8: that the vermouth is not a kind of a speaker is correct if it is saxicolous.;
$hypothesis$ = the vermouth is a turmeric. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the aftermath is denotative and it uncoils sidewall the sidewall is not branchless is not incorrect. sent2: if that something harangues revival but it does not upload dockyard is wrong it is not a turmeric. sent3: That the aliyah does not harangue predecessor is not incorrect. sent4: that the predecessor does not harangue aliyah is not incorrect. sent5: if something that does not harangue aliyah does not uncoil spokeswoman it does upload dockyard. sent6: the fact that something is a turmeric is correct if it is a speaker. sent7: if something is not a speaker then that it harangues revival and does not upload dockyard is not right. sent8: the vermouth is a switchboard and saxicolous if the sidewall is not branchless. sent9: if the predecessor uploads dockyard then the sidewall harangues revival. sent10: if something is saxicolous it is not a speaker. sent11: the predecessor does not uncoil spokeswoman. sent12: The spokeswoman does not uncoil predecessor. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the predecessor does not harangue aliyah and it does not uncoil spokeswoman then that it uploads dockyard is not wrong.; sent4 & sent11 -> int2: the predecessor does not harangue aliyah and does not uncoil spokeswoman.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the predecessor uploads dockyard.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the sidewall does harangue revival.; sent6 -> int5: if the vermouth is a kind of a speaker it is a kind of a turmeric.; __UNKNOWN__