the letting does not occur if the campanulateness occurs.
sent1: that both the campanulateness and the employableness occurs yields the letting. sent2: the symbolizing cyprinodont does not occur and the devolving does not occur. sent3: that the efferent happens and/or the polka does not occur does not hold. sent4: the letting occurs. sent5: that the greenhouseness happens hold. sent6: the numerating does not occur. sent7: if that the dominating bacon happens and/or the roundup happens does not hold the dominating quitter does not occur. sent8: if the campanulateness happens then the let happens. sent9: that the let occurs is prevented by that the campanulateness and the employable occurs. sent10: both the non-chlorophylloseness and the non-numerateness happens. sent11: the ctenoidness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the dominating bacon happens or the roundup does not occur or both is false. sent13: the dominating quitter does not occur if the fact that the fact that the dominating bacon happens and/or the roundup does not occur is not incorrect is not true. sent14: the antitrade does not occur and the allocution does not occur. sent15: that the popery occurs is prevented by that both the employable and the dominating quitter happens. sent16: the fact that the bigness occurs or the spending does not occur or both is false. sent17: the dialing does not occur. sent18: if the bigness does not occur the fact that the cockneiness does not occur and the ecoterrorism does not occur does not hold. sent19: if the chlorophylloseness does not occur then that the fact that the dominating quitter does not occur and the employable does not occur is not right is right. sent20: the roundup happens. sent21: if the fact that either the span occurs or the supplicating does not occur or both is wrong then the fibrinousness does not occur. sent22: the symbolizing middy does not occur if that either the parasiticness happens or the expatiation does not occur or both is false.
sent13 & sent12 -> int1: that the dominating quitter does not occur is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the employable does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dominating quitter does not occur and the employableness does not occur.; sent10 -> int3: the chlorophylloseness does not occur.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: that the dominating quitter does not occur and the employableness does not occur is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the employableness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the campanulateness occurs.; int6 & assump2 -> int7: both the campanulateness and the employableness happens.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the let does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the popery does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = the letting does not occur if the campanulateness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the campanulateness and the employableness occurs yields the letting. sent2: the symbolizing cyprinodont does not occur and the devolving does not occur. sent3: that the efferent happens and/or the polka does not occur does not hold. sent4: the letting occurs. sent5: that the greenhouseness happens hold. sent6: the numerating does not occur. sent7: if that the dominating bacon happens and/or the roundup happens does not hold the dominating quitter does not occur. sent8: if the campanulateness happens then the let happens. sent9: that the let occurs is prevented by that the campanulateness and the employable occurs. sent10: both the non-chlorophylloseness and the non-numerateness happens. sent11: the ctenoidness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the dominating bacon happens or the roundup does not occur or both is false. sent13: the dominating quitter does not occur if the fact that the fact that the dominating bacon happens and/or the roundup does not occur is not incorrect is not true. sent14: the antitrade does not occur and the allocution does not occur. sent15: that the popery occurs is prevented by that both the employable and the dominating quitter happens. sent16: the fact that the bigness occurs or the spending does not occur or both is false. sent17: the dialing does not occur. sent18: if the bigness does not occur the fact that the cockneiness does not occur and the ecoterrorism does not occur does not hold. sent19: if the chlorophylloseness does not occur then that the fact that the dominating quitter does not occur and the employable does not occur is not right is right. sent20: the roundup happens. sent21: if the fact that either the span occurs or the supplicating does not occur or both is wrong then the fibrinousness does not occur. sent22: the symbolizing middy does not occur if that either the parasiticness happens or the expatiation does not occur or both is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent12 -> int1: that the dominating quitter does not occur is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the employable does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dominating quitter does not occur and the employableness does not occur.; sent10 -> int3: the chlorophylloseness does not occur.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: that the dominating quitter does not occur and the employableness does not occur is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the employableness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the campanulateness occurs.; int6 & assump2 -> int7: both the campanulateness and the employableness happens.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the let does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__