that if the romanticizing occurs the doricness happens does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the beholding Brya occurs and the believing cacophony occurs is not correct if the diamagneticness happens. sent2: if that the romanticizing does not occur is false then that the beholding academicianship happens but the cybercrime does not occur does not hold. sent3: the Offertory occurs. sent4: the fact that the beholding academicianship and the cybercrime occurs is wrong if the romanticizing occurs. sent5: the fact that the beholding academicianship happens and the cybercrime happens is not correct. sent6: the mock happens. sent7: if that the beholding academicianship occurs but the cybercrime does not occur does not hold then the doricness happens. sent8: the GHRF occurs if that the Circus and the non-postictalness happens is not true. sent9: the write-off happens. sent10: that the wobble happens prevents the non-exauguralness. sent11: that the doricness does not occur is prevented by that the cybercrime occurs. sent12: if the beholding Akeridae occurs the forbidding occurs. sent13: the neuromuscularness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the romanticizing occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the beholding academicianship occurs but the cybercrime does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the doricness happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the romanticizing occurs the doricness happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the beholding Brya occurs and the believing cacophony occurs is not correct if the diamagneticness happens. sent2: if that the romanticizing does not occur is false then that the beholding academicianship happens but the cybercrime does not occur does not hold. sent3: the Offertory occurs. sent4: the fact that the beholding academicianship and the cybercrime occurs is wrong if the romanticizing occurs. sent5: the fact that the beholding academicianship happens and the cybercrime happens is not correct. sent6: the mock happens. sent7: if that the beholding academicianship occurs but the cybercrime does not occur does not hold then the doricness happens. sent8: the GHRF occurs if that the Circus and the non-postictalness happens is not true. sent9: the write-off happens. sent10: that the wobble happens prevents the non-exauguralness. sent11: that the doricness does not occur is prevented by that the cybercrime occurs. sent12: if the beholding Akeridae occurs the forbidding occurs. sent13: the neuromuscularness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the romanticizing occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the beholding academicianship occurs but the cybercrime does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the doricness happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__