the psychologist is incompressible.
sent1: the psychologist is not a brakes. sent2: that the sociopath is a rial and it does hibernate does not hold. sent3: everything does not lunch and is a pedodontist. sent4: if the sociopath hibernates then the fact that the community determines proprietress is true. sent5: if the sociopath is a kind of a rial and it hibernates then it is not a subset. sent6: if the fact that the fact that the putty is not a kind of a sacerdotalism and it does not preserve is right is not true then the community is not a subset. sent7: the psychologist does not hibernate. sent8: if the putty does preserve then the sociopath is a subset. sent9: the sociopath does not hibernate. sent10: something is non-negligent if it is not a lunch but a pedodontist. sent11: the sociopath does determine proprietress if the community is a subset. sent12: that the sociopath is not a kind of a subset is not wrong if it is a kind of a rial that does not hibernate. sent13: the putty determines proprietress. sent14: if that there is something such that it is not a subset is not wrong then either the sociopath is not a subset or it does not determine proprietress or both. sent15: the community does determine proprietress if the fact that the sociopath is a rial that does not hibernate is not correct. sent16: the flick hibernates. sent17: the psychologist is not a kind of a preserve. sent18: if something is not negligent then the fact that it is not a sacerdotalism and is not a preserve is false. sent19: the psychologist is incompressible if the community determines proprietress. sent20: the putty does preserve. sent21: the sociopath is not incompressible.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sociopath is a rial but it does not hibernate.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the sociopath is not a subset.; sent8 & sent20 -> int2: the sociopath is a subset.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the sociopath is a kind of a rial and does not hibernate is not true.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the community does determine proprietress.; int5 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the psychologist is not incompressible.
sent18 -> int6: the fact that the Psalter is not a sacerdotalism and it does not preserve is not correct if it is not negligent.; sent10 -> int7: if the Psalter does not lunch but it is a pedodontist it is not negligent.; sent3 -> int8: the Psalter does not lunch but it is a pedodontist.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Psalter is not negligent.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that that the Psalter is not a sacerdotalism and it does not preserve is false is right.; int10 -> int11: that there is nothing that is not a sacerdotalism and does not preserve is not incorrect.; int11 -> int12: the fact that the putty is not a kind of a sacerdotalism and it is not a kind of a preserve is false.; sent6 & int12 -> int13: that the community is not a subset hold.; int13 -> int14: something is not a kind of a subset.; sent14 & int14 -> int15: the sociopath is not a subset and/or does not determine proprietress.;
$hypothesis$ = the psychologist is incompressible. ; $context$ = sent1: the psychologist is not a brakes. sent2: that the sociopath is a rial and it does hibernate does not hold. sent3: everything does not lunch and is a pedodontist. sent4: if the sociopath hibernates then the fact that the community determines proprietress is true. sent5: if the sociopath is a kind of a rial and it hibernates then it is not a subset. sent6: if the fact that the fact that the putty is not a kind of a sacerdotalism and it does not preserve is right is not true then the community is not a subset. sent7: the psychologist does not hibernate. sent8: if the putty does preserve then the sociopath is a subset. sent9: the sociopath does not hibernate. sent10: something is non-negligent if it is not a lunch but a pedodontist. sent11: the sociopath does determine proprietress if the community is a subset. sent12: that the sociopath is not a kind of a subset is not wrong if it is a kind of a rial that does not hibernate. sent13: the putty determines proprietress. sent14: if that there is something such that it is not a subset is not wrong then either the sociopath is not a subset or it does not determine proprietress or both. sent15: the community does determine proprietress if the fact that the sociopath is a rial that does not hibernate is not correct. sent16: the flick hibernates. sent17: the psychologist is not a kind of a preserve. sent18: if something is not negligent then the fact that it is not a sacerdotalism and is not a preserve is false. sent19: the psychologist is incompressible if the community determines proprietress. sent20: the putty does preserve. sent21: the sociopath is not incompressible. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sociopath is a rial but it does not hibernate.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the sociopath is not a subset.; sent8 & sent20 -> int2: the sociopath is a subset.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the sociopath is a kind of a rial and does not hibernate is not true.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the community does determine proprietress.; int5 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__