the lisper is unseductive.
sent1: the connoisseur tabulates effort if it is a postern. sent2: the tailback does consort. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that that it is not a lye and it is not a commercialization is right is not true the Hinayanist is a syphilitic. sent4: the Hinayanist does not misgive tailback if the fact that it is a intercostal and does billow is wrong. sent5: something is not a syphilitic if the fact that it is not steroidal and does not tabulate effort is not true. sent6: if something does not misgive tailback the fact that it is nonsteroidal and it does not tabulate effort is not correct. sent7: if something does tabulate effort then the tailback is not steroidal. sent8: the Hinayanist is not non-syphilitic if there is something such that it is a kind of a lye. sent9: something is a billow and it does misgive tailback if it is not steroidal. sent10: something is not unseductive if that it is not a postern and is unseductive does not hold. sent11: there is something such that that it is not a lye and it is not a commercialization is not true. sent12: the tailback misgives tailback. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a lye and is not a commercialization is false. sent14: something misgives tailback if it is not steroidal. sent15: if the tailback is not steroidal then that it does misgive tailback is right. sent16: if the tailback does billow then the fact that the lisper is unseductive hold. sent17: there is something such that it is not a lye and is not a commercialization. sent18: something is steroidal and it is a billow if it is not unseductive. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a lye and it is a commercialization is not correct. sent20: if the Hinayanist is syphilitic that the connoisseur is not a postern is false.
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: the Hinayanist is a syphilitic.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the connoisseur is a kind of a postern.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the connoisseur does tabulate effort.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does tabulate effort.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the tailback is not steroidal.; sent9 -> int6: if the fact that the tailback is not steroidal is true then that it is a kind of a billow and misgives tailback is not incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the tailback is a billow and does misgive tailback.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the tailback is a billow hold.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the lisper is not unseductive.
sent10 -> int9: if the fact that the lisper is not a postern but it is unseductive does not hold then it is not unseductive.; sent5 -> int10: the Hinayanist is not a kind of a syphilitic if that it is not steroidal and it does not tabulate effort is false.; sent6 -> int11: if the Hinayanist does not misgive tailback that it is non-steroidal thing that does not tabulate effort is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the lisper is unseductive. ; $context$ = sent1: the connoisseur tabulates effort if it is a postern. sent2: the tailback does consort. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that that it is not a lye and it is not a commercialization is right is not true the Hinayanist is a syphilitic. sent4: the Hinayanist does not misgive tailback if the fact that it is a intercostal and does billow is wrong. sent5: something is not a syphilitic if the fact that it is not steroidal and does not tabulate effort is not true. sent6: if something does not misgive tailback the fact that it is nonsteroidal and it does not tabulate effort is not correct. sent7: if something does tabulate effort then the tailback is not steroidal. sent8: the Hinayanist is not non-syphilitic if there is something such that it is a kind of a lye. sent9: something is a billow and it does misgive tailback if it is not steroidal. sent10: something is not unseductive if that it is not a postern and is unseductive does not hold. sent11: there is something such that that it is not a lye and it is not a commercialization is not true. sent12: the tailback misgives tailback. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a lye and is not a commercialization is false. sent14: something misgives tailback if it is not steroidal. sent15: if the tailback is not steroidal then that it does misgive tailback is right. sent16: if the tailback does billow then the fact that the lisper is unseductive hold. sent17: there is something such that it is not a lye and is not a commercialization. sent18: something is steroidal and it is a billow if it is not unseductive. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a lye and it is a commercialization is not correct. sent20: if the Hinayanist is syphilitic that the connoisseur is not a postern is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: the Hinayanist is a syphilitic.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the connoisseur is a kind of a postern.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the connoisseur does tabulate effort.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does tabulate effort.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the tailback is not steroidal.; sent9 -> int6: if the fact that the tailback is not steroidal is true then that it is a kind of a billow and misgives tailback is not incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the tailback is a billow and does misgive tailback.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the tailback is a billow hold.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__