the spritzer is a kind of a Dreissena.
sent1: the fact that the suction either is not a dictate or does not elude or both is not right if it is a kind of a look. sent2: the suction is not a dictate or it does not elude or both if the fact that the glowworm is not a kind of a dictate hold. sent3: that the spritzer is not equal but it is pervious is wrong if it is a Dreissena. sent4: the suction looks. sent5: the glowworm is not a kind of a dictate if that the spritzer does not equal and it is not pervious is not correct. sent6: the fact that the spritzer is unequal and impervious is not correct if it is a Dreissena. sent7: the suction is not garlicky but it eludes if the anteater is not a cartage. sent8: if the glowworm is not pervious then the spritzer is not pervious or it dictates or both. sent9: if there is something such that it looks the fact that the spritzer does dictate but it is not a looks does not hold. sent10: everything is both not a cartage and not Argentine. sent11: the glowworm is a look if a non-garlicky thing does elude.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spritzer is a Dreissena.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the spritzer does not equal and it is not pervious is false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the glowworm does not dictate.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the suction does not dictate and/or it does not elude.; sent1 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the suction is not a kind of a dictate and/or does not elude is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the spritzer is a Dreissena.
sent10 -> int6: the plasticizer is both not a cartage and not Argentine.; int6 -> int7: the plasticizer is not a kind of a cartage.; int7 -> int8: everything is not a cartage.; int8 -> int9: the anteater is not a cartage.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the suction is non-garlicky thing that does elude.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is not garlicky and it does elude.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the glowworm is a kind of a look.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it looks.; sent9 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the spritzer is a dictate and is not a look does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the spritzer is a kind of a Dreissena. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the suction either is not a dictate or does not elude or both is not right if it is a kind of a look. sent2: the suction is not a dictate or it does not elude or both if the fact that the glowworm is not a kind of a dictate hold. sent3: that the spritzer is not equal but it is pervious is wrong if it is a Dreissena. sent4: the suction looks. sent5: the glowworm is not a kind of a dictate if that the spritzer does not equal and it is not pervious is not correct. sent6: the fact that the spritzer is unequal and impervious is not correct if it is a Dreissena. sent7: the suction is not garlicky but it eludes if the anteater is not a cartage. sent8: if the glowworm is not pervious then the spritzer is not pervious or it dictates or both. sent9: if there is something such that it looks the fact that the spritzer does dictate but it is not a looks does not hold. sent10: everything is both not a cartage and not Argentine. sent11: the glowworm is a look if a non-garlicky thing does elude. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spritzer is a Dreissena.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the spritzer does not equal and it is not pervious is false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the glowworm does not dictate.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the suction does not dictate and/or it does not elude.; sent1 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the suction is not a kind of a dictate and/or does not elude is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__