the fact that the earth is not a kind of a Hasidim is not false.
sent1: the eyecup is not a Mead but it is a kind of a whistling if the stockade is not lethargic. sent2: everything is stylish. sent3: the waitress is not a obloquy. sent4: the cabinetmaker is a kind of a Hasidim if there exists something such that that it is not a tailed and it is not cretaceous is incorrect. sent5: if something that is a obloquy is a Hasidim that the cabinetmaker is not a kind of a Mead is right. sent6: if there is something such that it is not succinic then the masdevallia defrays eyecup. sent7: the earth does tail if the cabinetmaker is cretaceous. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Hasidim. sent9: the cabinetmaker is a kind of a Mead. sent10: the ornithischian is not inertial. sent11: that if the eyecup does not entrance intention and is a obloquy the assimilation is a obloquy is correct. sent12: everything is a leaseholder. sent13: the ptyalith is not odorous if something is a kind of cretaceous thing that does entrance intention. sent14: the fact that if the masdevallia defrays eyecup the stockade does scallop syncope hold. sent15: if the ornithischian is stylish then the earth is cretaceous. sent16: there exists something such that it is a obloquy. sent17: if something scallops syncope it is not lethargic but a mycologist. sent18: if the earth is stylish then the ornithischian is cretaceous. sent19: if the earth is cretaceous then it is a tailed. sent20: something is a obloquy and it is a kind of a Mead. sent21: the fact that that the assimilation is not a tailed and not cretaceous is wrong is true if it is a obloquy. sent22: there is something such that it is not succinic. sent23: if something is not a Mead it does not entrance intention and it is a kind of a obloquy.
sent2 -> int1: the ornithischian is stylish.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the earth is cretaceous.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: that the earth is a kind of a tailed is not incorrect.;
the earth is a kind of a Hasidim.
sent23 -> int4: that if the eyecup is not the Mead then the eyecup does not entrance intention but it is a obloquy is not false.; sent17 -> int5: if the stockade does scallop syncope then it is not lethargic and is a mycologist.; sent22 & sent6 -> int6: the masdevallia does defray eyecup.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: that the stockade scallops syncope is correct.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the stockade is not lethargic but a mycologist.; int8 -> int9: the stockade is not lethargic.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the eyecup is both not a Mead and a whistling.; int10 -> int11: the eyecup is not a kind of a Mead.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the eyecup does not entrance intention but it is a obloquy.; sent11 & int12 -> int13: the assimilation is a obloquy.; sent21 & int13 -> int14: that the assimilation is not a tailed and not cretaceous is wrong.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a tailed and not cretaceous is incorrect.; int15 & sent4 -> int16: the cabinetmaker is a Hasidim.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is a Hasidim.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the earth is not a kind of a Hasidim is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the eyecup is not a Mead but it is a kind of a whistling if the stockade is not lethargic. sent2: everything is stylish. sent3: the waitress is not a obloquy. sent4: the cabinetmaker is a kind of a Hasidim if there exists something such that that it is not a tailed and it is not cretaceous is incorrect. sent5: if something that is a obloquy is a Hasidim that the cabinetmaker is not a kind of a Mead is right. sent6: if there is something such that it is not succinic then the masdevallia defrays eyecup. sent7: the earth does tail if the cabinetmaker is cretaceous. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Hasidim. sent9: the cabinetmaker is a kind of a Mead. sent10: the ornithischian is not inertial. sent11: that if the eyecup does not entrance intention and is a obloquy the assimilation is a obloquy is correct. sent12: everything is a leaseholder. sent13: the ptyalith is not odorous if something is a kind of cretaceous thing that does entrance intention. sent14: the fact that if the masdevallia defrays eyecup the stockade does scallop syncope hold. sent15: if the ornithischian is stylish then the earth is cretaceous. sent16: there exists something such that it is a obloquy. sent17: if something scallops syncope it is not lethargic but a mycologist. sent18: if the earth is stylish then the ornithischian is cretaceous. sent19: if the earth is cretaceous then it is a tailed. sent20: something is a obloquy and it is a kind of a Mead. sent21: the fact that that the assimilation is not a tailed and not cretaceous is wrong is true if it is a obloquy. sent22: there is something such that it is not succinic. sent23: if something is not a Mead it does not entrance intention and it is a kind of a obloquy. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the ornithischian is stylish.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the earth is cretaceous.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: that the earth is a kind of a tailed is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__