the overload does not abandon Klee and does not investigate overload.
sent1: that the overload does abandon Klee but it does not investigate overload is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the overload does not abandon Klee but it does investigate overload does not hold. sent3: if the overload does debrief Hypericum it does investigate Tetragrammaton. sent4: there is nothing that is both a prospect and not unhealthful. sent5: if the overload is not a dallisgrass then the fact that it does not abandon Klee and does not investigate overload is not true. sent6: something is a crouch if it is a kind of a etymologist. sent7: that the overload does not debrief charterhouse and does not diffuse powderpuff is wrong. sent8: if something that abandons Klee is a kind of a dallisgrass then the Hittite does not investigate Tetragrammaton. sent9: the fact that the secretion investigates Tetragrammaton if the mademoiselle is not a dallisgrass and it is not orthopedics is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the overload does abandon Klee and does not investigate overload is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a dallisgrass hold. sent11: if something does investigate Tetragrammaton it debriefs Hypericum. sent12: The Tetragrammaton does not investigate overload. sent13: the overload is not earlier. sent14: the overload does not abandon Klee and it does not investigate overload if the secretion debriefs Hypericum. sent15: the secretion is a kind of a etymologist. sent16: the overload is a dallisgrass if the fact that it is not a crouch or it is not orthopedics or both does not hold. sent17: the bluecoat does investigate overload. sent18: the overload does not investigate Tetragrammaton. sent19: the fact that that the overload does not abandon Klee but it investigates overload does not hold hold if it is not a dallisgrass. sent20: if the fact that something is a prospect but it is not unhealthful is not correct it is a etymologist. sent21: the overload is not a dallisgrass if it does not debrief Hypericum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the overload debriefs Hypericum.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the overload does investigate Tetragrammaton.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the overload does not debrief Hypericum.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the overload is not a dallisgrass is true.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the overload does not abandon Klee and does not investigate overload.
sent11 -> int5: the secretion debriefs Hypericum if it does investigate Tetragrammaton.; sent6 -> int6: if the sharpener is a etymologist the fact that it is a crouch hold.; sent20 -> int7: the sharpener is a etymologist if that it does prospect and it is not unhealthful is false.; sent4 -> int8: the fact that the sharpener does prospect and is sanitary does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the sharpener is a etymologist.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the sharpener is a kind of a crouch.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it crouches.;
$hypothesis$ = the overload does not abandon Klee and does not investigate overload. ; $context$ = sent1: that the overload does abandon Klee but it does not investigate overload is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the overload does not abandon Klee but it does investigate overload does not hold. sent3: if the overload does debrief Hypericum it does investigate Tetragrammaton. sent4: there is nothing that is both a prospect and not unhealthful. sent5: if the overload is not a dallisgrass then the fact that it does not abandon Klee and does not investigate overload is not true. sent6: something is a crouch if it is a kind of a etymologist. sent7: that the overload does not debrief charterhouse and does not diffuse powderpuff is wrong. sent8: if something that abandons Klee is a kind of a dallisgrass then the Hittite does not investigate Tetragrammaton. sent9: the fact that the secretion investigates Tetragrammaton if the mademoiselle is not a dallisgrass and it is not orthopedics is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the overload does abandon Klee and does not investigate overload is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a dallisgrass hold. sent11: if something does investigate Tetragrammaton it debriefs Hypericum. sent12: The Tetragrammaton does not investigate overload. sent13: the overload is not earlier. sent14: the overload does not abandon Klee and it does not investigate overload if the secretion debriefs Hypericum. sent15: the secretion is a kind of a etymologist. sent16: the overload is a dallisgrass if the fact that it is not a crouch or it is not orthopedics or both does not hold. sent17: the bluecoat does investigate overload. sent18: the overload does not investigate Tetragrammaton. sent19: the fact that that the overload does not abandon Klee but it investigates overload does not hold hold if it is not a dallisgrass. sent20: if the fact that something is a prospect but it is not unhealthful is not correct it is a etymologist. sent21: the overload is not a dallisgrass if it does not debrief Hypericum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the overload debriefs Hypericum.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the overload does investigate Tetragrammaton.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the overload does not debrief Hypericum.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the overload is not a dallisgrass is true.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__