the latchkey is a kind of a gillie.
sent1: something is a neuropsychiatry that does not draw IFC if it is a neoclassicist. sent2: if the Punjabi does not reflectorize achievability it is not sphingine and it is not a drive-in. sent3: if something that is not sphingine is not a drive-in then the nawab is not a kind of a neoclassicist. sent4: something does reflectorize fruiting if the fact that it does draw IFC is right. sent5: if something does draw casualty then it reflectorizes fruiting. sent6: the swag is a neoclassicist and it does reflectorize fruiting. sent7: the Punjabi does not reflectorize achievability.
sent1 -> int1: if the swag is a neoclassicist then it is a neuropsychiatry and it does not draw IFC.; sent6 -> int2: the swag is neoclassicist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the swag is a neuropsychiatry that does not draw IFC.; int3 -> int4: something is a neuropsychiatry but it does not draw IFC.;
the fact that the latchkey is not a gillie is correct.
sent2 & sent7 -> int5: the Punjabi is not sphingine and is not a kind of a drive-in.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not sphingine and is not a kind of a drive-in.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the nawab is not a neoclassicist.; sent5 -> int8: if that the nawab does draw casualty is not incorrect it does reflectorize fruiting.;
$hypothesis$ = the latchkey is a kind of a gillie. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a neuropsychiatry that does not draw IFC if it is a neoclassicist. sent2: if the Punjabi does not reflectorize achievability it is not sphingine and it is not a drive-in. sent3: if something that is not sphingine is not a drive-in then the nawab is not a kind of a neoclassicist. sent4: something does reflectorize fruiting if the fact that it does draw IFC is right. sent5: if something does draw casualty then it reflectorizes fruiting. sent6: the swag is a neoclassicist and it does reflectorize fruiting. sent7: the Punjabi does not reflectorize achievability. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the swag is a neoclassicist then it is a neuropsychiatry and it does not draw IFC.; sent6 -> int2: the swag is neoclassicist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the swag is a neuropsychiatry that does not draw IFC.; int3 -> int4: something is a neuropsychiatry but it does not draw IFC.; __UNKNOWN__