that the caroling foredge occurs if the caroling Freon happens is not correct.
sent1: the caroling foredge happens if the unapologeticness does not occur. sent2: the aphakic happens. sent3: that both the caroling Freon and the aphakicness happens yields that the unapologeticness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caroling Freon occurs.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the caroling Freon occurs and the aphakic happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the unapologeticness does not occur is right.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the caroling foredge happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the caroling foredge occurs if the caroling Freon happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the caroling foredge happens if the unapologeticness does not occur. sent2: the aphakic happens. sent3: that both the caroling Freon and the aphakicness happens yields that the unapologeticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caroling Freon occurs.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the caroling Freon occurs and the aphakic happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the unapologeticness does not occur is right.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the caroling foredge happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__