the fact that the mealybug is a kind of a tracker and/or it is not an aesthetics does not hold.
sent1: something is not a pallidum if the fact that it is a tracker that is a kind of a Chamaeleon is false. sent2: the orator does not telescope. sent3: if the mealybug does dropkick potamogale the marlinespike is not aesthetics. sent4: if the marlinespike does not dropkick blamelessness the fact that the orator is a Chamaeleon and it is a leash does not hold. sent5: if something is a leash it does dropkick potamogale and it does not exceed. sent6: something dropkicks potamogale but it is not a tracker if it dropkicks blamelessness. sent7: the collation is a dredger. sent8: that the bunyavirus is non-vulpine a conquest is false if that something is a dredger hold. sent9: the baklava is not a kind of a lecanopteris if the fact that it does not startle cyan and it does not exceed is not true. sent10: the piedmont is a kind of a leash if the fact that the orator is not a telescope but it is a geneticism is wrong. sent11: something is a Chamaeleon if it is not a lecanopteris and it does startle cyan. sent12: if the orator does not telescope then it is a geneticism that does not dropkick blamelessness. sent13: the baklava is a Chamaeleon if it is a tracker. sent14: if something is a kind of a leash the baklava does dropkick potamogale and/or is a lecanopteris. sent15: if that something is not an aesthetics and it is not a kind of a Chamaeleon is not true then it is a kind of an aesthetics. sent16: the fact that the marlinespike exceeds and/or it is not a lecanopteris is false if the baklava does not exceeds. sent17: the mealybug is not a lecanopteris if the baklava dropkicks potamogale and/or it is a lecanopteris. sent18: if the piedmont does not startle cyan that the marlinespike does dropkick potamogale but it does not exceed is not right. sent19: if the marlinespike does not dropkick blamelessness that the mealybug startles cyan and it does exceed is not wrong. sent20: if the fact that something is a kind of a Chamaeleon is correct it is a kind of a tracker. sent21: the piedmont does not startle cyan if either the baklava is a lecanopteris or it is a kind of a Chamaeleon or both. sent22: the marlinespike does not dropkick blamelessness if it does not dropkick patriarchy. sent23: if something does not dropkick potamogale the fact that it does not startle cyan and does not exceed is incorrect. sent24: the fact that something is both not a telescope and a geneticism does not hold if it is not a conquest. sent25: if the fact that the baklava is not a tracker is not wrong then the fact that the mealybug is a tracker or is not aesthetics or both does not hold. sent26: if there exists something such that it is not a pallidum the fact that the piedmont is a pallidum but it does not dropkick blamelessness does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the baklava is a tracker.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the baklava is a Chamaeleon.; int1 -> int2: the baklava is a lecanopteris and/or is a Chamaeleon.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the piedmont does not startle cyan.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: that the marlinespike dropkicks potamogale and does not exceed does not hold.; sent5 -> int5: that the marlinespike dropkicks potamogale but it does not exceed if the marlinespike is a leash is true.; sent12 & sent2 -> int6: the orator is a geneticism but it does not dropkick blamelessness.;
the moon is aesthetics.
sent15 -> int7: if the fact that the moon is a kind of non-aesthetics thing that is not a kind of a Chamaeleon does not hold then it is a non-aesthetics.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mealybug is a kind of a tracker and/or it is not an aesthetics does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a pallidum if the fact that it is a tracker that is a kind of a Chamaeleon is false. sent2: the orator does not telescope. sent3: if the mealybug does dropkick potamogale the marlinespike is not aesthetics. sent4: if the marlinespike does not dropkick blamelessness the fact that the orator is a Chamaeleon and it is a leash does not hold. sent5: if something is a leash it does dropkick potamogale and it does not exceed. sent6: something dropkicks potamogale but it is not a tracker if it dropkicks blamelessness. sent7: the collation is a dredger. sent8: that the bunyavirus is non-vulpine a conquest is false if that something is a dredger hold. sent9: the baklava is not a kind of a lecanopteris if the fact that it does not startle cyan and it does not exceed is not true. sent10: the piedmont is a kind of a leash if the fact that the orator is not a telescope but it is a geneticism is wrong. sent11: something is a Chamaeleon if it is not a lecanopteris and it does startle cyan. sent12: if the orator does not telescope then it is a geneticism that does not dropkick blamelessness. sent13: the baklava is a Chamaeleon if it is a tracker. sent14: if something is a kind of a leash the baklava does dropkick potamogale and/or is a lecanopteris. sent15: if that something is not an aesthetics and it is not a kind of a Chamaeleon is not true then it is a kind of an aesthetics. sent16: the fact that the marlinespike exceeds and/or it is not a lecanopteris is false if the baklava does not exceeds. sent17: the mealybug is not a lecanopteris if the baklava dropkicks potamogale and/or it is a lecanopteris. sent18: if the piedmont does not startle cyan that the marlinespike does dropkick potamogale but it does not exceed is not right. sent19: if the marlinespike does not dropkick blamelessness that the mealybug startles cyan and it does exceed is not wrong. sent20: if the fact that something is a kind of a Chamaeleon is correct it is a kind of a tracker. sent21: the piedmont does not startle cyan if either the baklava is a lecanopteris or it is a kind of a Chamaeleon or both. sent22: the marlinespike does not dropkick blamelessness if it does not dropkick patriarchy. sent23: if something does not dropkick potamogale the fact that it does not startle cyan and does not exceed is incorrect. sent24: the fact that something is both not a telescope and a geneticism does not hold if it is not a conquest. sent25: if the fact that the baklava is not a tracker is not wrong then the fact that the mealybug is a tracker or is not aesthetics or both does not hold. sent26: if there exists something such that it is not a pallidum the fact that the piedmont is a pallidum but it does not dropkick blamelessness does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the baklava is a tracker.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the baklava is a Chamaeleon.; int1 -> int2: the baklava is a lecanopteris and/or is a Chamaeleon.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the piedmont does not startle cyan.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: that the marlinespike dropkicks potamogale and does not exceed does not hold.; sent5 -> int5: that the marlinespike dropkicks potamogale but it does not exceed if the marlinespike is a leash is true.; sent12 & sent2 -> int6: the orator is a geneticism but it does not dropkick blamelessness.; __UNKNOWN__