that if the affair happens then that the autogenousness occurs and the tearfulness does not occur is false is not correct.
sent1: if that the affair does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur is not right then the calorimetry occurs. sent2: the compartmentalizing Volvariella does not occur. sent3: that the abdominovesicalness happens is prevented by that the compartmentalizing Volvariella does not occur and the billowing does not occur. sent4: if the abdominovesicalness does not occur then that the affair does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur is incorrect. sent5: if the autogenousness and the affair occurs then the groping does not occur. sent6: both the grope and the abdominovesicalness happens. sent7: the abdominovesicalness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the autogenousness but not the tearfulness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the autogenousness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the affair occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the autogenousness and the affair occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the grope does not occur.; sent6 -> int4: the groping happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the autogenousness occurs but the tearfulness does not occur does not hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the calorimetry happens and the familiarness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if the affair happens then that the autogenousness occurs and the tearfulness does not occur is false is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the affair does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur is not right then the calorimetry occurs. sent2: the compartmentalizing Volvariella does not occur. sent3: that the abdominovesicalness happens is prevented by that the compartmentalizing Volvariella does not occur and the billowing does not occur. sent4: if the abdominovesicalness does not occur then that the affair does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur is incorrect. sent5: if the autogenousness and the affair occurs then the groping does not occur. sent6: both the grope and the abdominovesicalness happens. sent7: the abdominovesicalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the autogenousness but not the tearfulness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the autogenousness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the affair occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the autogenousness and the affair occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the grope does not occur.; sent6 -> int4: the groping happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the autogenousness occurs but the tearfulness does not occur does not hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__