if that the unipolarness does not occur and the congregation does not occur is not correct the congregation occurs.
sent1: not the stabilizing but the stroking DM occurs. sent2: that not the stabilizing but the stroking DM occurs triggers the non-unipolarness. sent3: the stabilizing does not occur. sent4: the singling Galway occurs.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the unipolarness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the congregation does not occur hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the unipolarness does not occur and the congregation does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the unipolarness does not occur and the congregation does not occur is not right.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the congregation happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if that the unipolarness does not occur and the congregation does not occur is not correct the congregation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: not the stabilizing but the stroking DM occurs. sent2: that not the stabilizing but the stroking DM occurs triggers the non-unipolarness. sent3: the stabilizing does not occur. sent4: the singling Galway occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the unipolarness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the congregation does not occur hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the unipolarness does not occur and the congregation does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the unipolarness does not occur and the congregation does not occur is not right.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the congregation happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__