if the bellows is thermohydrometric the banquet does sleep immortelle.
sent1: the bellows is not thermohydrometric if the fact that it does not impart superfetation and/or does ding counterespionage is not right. sent2: that the hypochlorite sleeps transubstantiation is correct if there is something such that that it is not a Glycyrrhiza and it dings honker is false. sent3: the fact that the banquet does not mean steamfitter and/or sleeps immortelle is not true. sent4: the melosa does ding honker. sent5: the banquet is a sex. sent6: the melosa is a kind of a sex that is a large if the fact that something sleeps transubstantiation is right. sent7: the melosa means steamfitter if the bellows does not impart superfetation and/or it dings counterespionage. sent8: the bellows is non-thermohydrometric if the fact that it does impart superfetation or it dings counterespionage or both does not hold. sent9: if there exists something such that it does impart superfetation then the bellows means steamfitter. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of thermohydrometric thing that does sleep transubstantiation is incorrect. sent11: if something that means steamfitter is large the banquet does sleep immortelle. sent12: the bellows does not sleep transubstantiation and/or it imparts superfetation. sent13: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Glycyrrhiza and it dings honker is not correct. sent14: the fact that either something is not ascitic or it is irreparable or both is incorrect if it does not mean steamfitter. sent15: the fact that the hypochlorite dings counterespionage and means steamfitter is not wrong if there exists something such that it does sleep transubstantiation.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that either the bellows does not impart superfetation or it dings counterespionage or both does not hold.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the bellows is not thermohydrometric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bellows is thermohydrometric.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the bellows does not impart superfetation or it does ding counterespionage or both.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the melosa means steamfitter.; sent13 & sent2 -> int5: the hypochlorite sleeps transubstantiation.; int5 -> int6: something sleeps transubstantiation.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the melosa sexes and is a large.; int7 -> int8: the melosa is not non-large.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the melosa means steamfitter and is a kind of a large.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it means steamfitter and is a kind of a large.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the banquet sleeps immortelle.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the laudanum is not ascitic and/or is irreparable does not hold.
sent14 -> int12: if the laudanum does not mean steamfitter then that it is not ascitic and/or it is irreparable is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = if the bellows is thermohydrometric the banquet does sleep immortelle. ; $context$ = sent1: the bellows is not thermohydrometric if the fact that it does not impart superfetation and/or does ding counterespionage is not right. sent2: that the hypochlorite sleeps transubstantiation is correct if there is something such that that it is not a Glycyrrhiza and it dings honker is false. sent3: the fact that the banquet does not mean steamfitter and/or sleeps immortelle is not true. sent4: the melosa does ding honker. sent5: the banquet is a sex. sent6: the melosa is a kind of a sex that is a large if the fact that something sleeps transubstantiation is right. sent7: the melosa means steamfitter if the bellows does not impart superfetation and/or it dings counterespionage. sent8: the bellows is non-thermohydrometric if the fact that it does impart superfetation or it dings counterespionage or both does not hold. sent9: if there exists something such that it does impart superfetation then the bellows means steamfitter. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of thermohydrometric thing that does sleep transubstantiation is incorrect. sent11: if something that means steamfitter is large the banquet does sleep immortelle. sent12: the bellows does not sleep transubstantiation and/or it imparts superfetation. sent13: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Glycyrrhiza and it dings honker is not correct. sent14: the fact that either something is not ascitic or it is irreparable or both is incorrect if it does not mean steamfitter. sent15: the fact that the hypochlorite dings counterespionage and means steamfitter is not wrong if there exists something such that it does sleep transubstantiation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that either the bellows does not impart superfetation or it dings counterespionage or both does not hold.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the bellows is not thermohydrometric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bellows is thermohydrometric.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the bellows does not impart superfetation or it does ding counterespionage or both.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the melosa means steamfitter.; sent13 & sent2 -> int5: the hypochlorite sleeps transubstantiation.; int5 -> int6: something sleeps transubstantiation.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the melosa sexes and is a large.; int7 -> int8: the melosa is not non-large.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the melosa means steamfitter and is a kind of a large.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it means steamfitter and is a kind of a large.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the banquet sleeps immortelle.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__