the airfoil does judge withstander and is a swoosh.
sent1: if that something is not scalic and it is not a chorister does not hold it is a swoosh. sent2: the switchboard is a kind of a nutrient if that it is not a chorister and is not scalic is not right. sent3: the airfoil does rice switchboard. sent4: if that the crooner is non-scalic and it is not a chorister is not incorrect the switchboard does not judge withstander. sent5: the fact that the fact that the airfoil is not a chorister and not the nutrient is not right if the airfoil does rice switchboard is not incorrect. sent6: the switchboard is scalic. sent7: if the airfoil rices switchboard then the fact that it is a chorister and it is not a nutrient is incorrect. sent8: that the switchboard does not rice switchboard and does not judge withstander is not right if it is scalic. sent9: something does judge withstander if the fact that it is not a chorister and it is not a kind of a nutrient is wrong. sent10: the crooner is a nutrient. sent11: that either the crooner snags ordered or it does not charm orchestrator or both does not hold if the switchboard is scalic. sent12: the switchboard charms orchestrator. sent13: the airfoil is a swoosh if that that the crooner either snags ordered or does not charm orchestrator or both is not true is not incorrect. sent14: the crooner is a swoosh. sent15: the fact that the airfoil is not a chorister but non-scapular does not hold. sent16: The switchboard does rice airfoil. sent17: that the crooner does charm orchestrator hold. sent18: if something is a chorister then it does judge withstander. sent19: the fact that the switchboard is scalic and is not a kind of a nutrient does not hold if it does rice switchboard.
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: that either the crooner snags ordered or it does not charm orchestrator or both is not correct.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the airfoil is a kind of a swoosh.; sent9 -> int3: the airfoil does judge withstander if that it is not a chorister and it is not a nutrient is false.; sent5 & sent3 -> int4: that the fact that the airfoil is not a chorister and it is not a nutrient is correct is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the airfoil judges withstander.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the airfoil judges withstander and it is a kind of a swoosh does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the airfoil does judge withstander and is a swoosh. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not scalic and it is not a chorister does not hold it is a swoosh. sent2: the switchboard is a kind of a nutrient if that it is not a chorister and is not scalic is not right. sent3: the airfoil does rice switchboard. sent4: if that the crooner is non-scalic and it is not a chorister is not incorrect the switchboard does not judge withstander. sent5: the fact that the fact that the airfoil is not a chorister and not the nutrient is not right if the airfoil does rice switchboard is not incorrect. sent6: the switchboard is scalic. sent7: if the airfoil rices switchboard then the fact that it is a chorister and it is not a nutrient is incorrect. sent8: that the switchboard does not rice switchboard and does not judge withstander is not right if it is scalic. sent9: something does judge withstander if the fact that it is not a chorister and it is not a kind of a nutrient is wrong. sent10: the crooner is a nutrient. sent11: that either the crooner snags ordered or it does not charm orchestrator or both does not hold if the switchboard is scalic. sent12: the switchboard charms orchestrator. sent13: the airfoil is a swoosh if that that the crooner either snags ordered or does not charm orchestrator or both is not true is not incorrect. sent14: the crooner is a swoosh. sent15: the fact that the airfoil is not a chorister but non-scapular does not hold. sent16: The switchboard does rice airfoil. sent17: that the crooner does charm orchestrator hold. sent18: if something is a chorister then it does judge withstander. sent19: the fact that the switchboard is scalic and is not a kind of a nutrient does not hold if it does rice switchboard. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: that either the crooner snags ordered or it does not charm orchestrator or both is not correct.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the airfoil is a kind of a swoosh.; sent9 -> int3: the airfoil does judge withstander if that it is not a chorister and it is not a nutrient is false.; sent5 & sent3 -> int4: that the fact that the airfoil is not a chorister and it is not a nutrient is correct is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the airfoil judges withstander.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__