the fact that there is something such that if it is a crash then that it is not ecclesiastical and it is not bifilar is not true does not hold.
sent1: that something is not ecclesiastical but bifilar does not hold if it is a crash. sent2: that something is both ecclesiastical and not bifilar does not hold if it is a crash. sent3: the fact that the polymer is not a substantive and does not toilet-train Lorentz is not correct if it is ecclesiastical. sent4: that the fact that the polymer is not ecclesiastical and it does not syllogize Cappadocia is not wrong is incorrect if it is a delinquency. sent5: that the polymer is both discernible and non-bifilar is wrong if it crusades. sent6: something is not ecclesiastical and not bifilar if it is a crash. sent7: there is something such that if it does crash then that it is ecclesiastical and it is not bifilar does not hold. sent8: the fact that something is not ecclesiastical and it is not bifilar is false if it does crash. sent9: there is something such that if it is chalybeate then the fact that it is not a nutrient and it is not valid is incorrect. sent10: if the polymer crashes then it is not ecclesiastical and it is not bifilar. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a originalism then that the fact that it does not toilet-train thanatophobia and is not a antediluvian is not incorrect is incorrect. sent12: there is something such that if it does toilet-train Citlaltepetl then the fact that it does not syllogize toehold and does not syllogize goosefoot is not true. sent13: that the polymer is both not non-ecclesiastical and non-bifilar does not hold if the fact that it crashes is not false. sent14: the fact that the polymer is both not ecclesiastical and bifilar is not right if the fact that it crashes is correct. sent15: there is something such that if it is a crash then the fact that it is not ecclesiastical and it is bifilar is incorrect. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a crash it is not ecclesiastical and not bifilar.
sent8 -> int1: if the polymer does crash the fact that it is not ecclesiastical and not bifilar does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a crash then that it is not ecclesiastical and it is not bifilar is not true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not ecclesiastical but bifilar does not hold if it is a crash. sent2: that something is both ecclesiastical and not bifilar does not hold if it is a crash. sent3: the fact that the polymer is not a substantive and does not toilet-train Lorentz is not correct if it is ecclesiastical. sent4: that the fact that the polymer is not ecclesiastical and it does not syllogize Cappadocia is not wrong is incorrect if it is a delinquency. sent5: that the polymer is both discernible and non-bifilar is wrong if it crusades. sent6: something is not ecclesiastical and not bifilar if it is a crash. sent7: there is something such that if it does crash then that it is ecclesiastical and it is not bifilar does not hold. sent8: the fact that something is not ecclesiastical and it is not bifilar is false if it does crash. sent9: there is something such that if it is chalybeate then the fact that it is not a nutrient and it is not valid is incorrect. sent10: if the polymer crashes then it is not ecclesiastical and it is not bifilar. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a originalism then that the fact that it does not toilet-train thanatophobia and is not a antediluvian is not incorrect is incorrect. sent12: there is something such that if it does toilet-train Citlaltepetl then the fact that it does not syllogize toehold and does not syllogize goosefoot is not true. sent13: that the polymer is both not non-ecclesiastical and non-bifilar does not hold if the fact that it crashes is not false. sent14: the fact that the polymer is both not ecclesiastical and bifilar is not right if the fact that it crashes is correct. sent15: there is something such that if it is a crash then the fact that it is not ecclesiastical and it is bifilar is incorrect. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a crash it is not ecclesiastical and not bifilar. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the polymer does crash the fact that it is not ecclesiastical and not bifilar does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__