the Mexican is inclement.
sent1: the Mexican either is neckless or is inclement or both. sent2: the Mexican is not inclement if there is something such that the fact that it is neckless or destabilizes or both hold. sent3: the Mexican does stroke Sutherland. sent4: the clinic is neckless if the Guyanese is a kind of a pull. sent5: if the clinic is not neckless then the Mexican is a kind of a pull and it is inclement. sent6: if the nan does not destabilize then the fact that it does stroke Worcestershire and it is cardiovascular is not true. sent7: the nan does not destabilize. sent8: if there is something such that it destabilizes the Mexican is not inclement. sent9: the Mexican is inclement or is a pull or both. sent10: the clinic is either inclement or a pull or both. sent11: the sarsaparilla is clement. sent12: something is not neckless if the fact that it is neckless and it is cardiovascular is not true. sent13: if the clinic is a pull the Guyanese is neckless. sent14: the sole does prefigure. sent15: the clinic is not a kind of a paralogism. sent16: the clinic is inclement if the Mexican pulls. sent17: something does stroke subeditor or is amphitheatric or both. sent18: the Mexican is a kind of a pull and/or it is inclement. sent19: if there exists something such that it is neckless and/or it is inclement then the Mexican does not destabilize. sent20: the fact that the clinic is a pull is right. sent21: there exists something such that it is neckless or it is inclement or both.
sent13 & sent20 -> int1: the Guyanese is neckless.; int1 -> int2: the Guyanese either is neckless or does destabilize or both.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not necked and/or it does destabilize.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the Mexican is inclement.
sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the clinic is neckless thing that is cardiovascular does not hold then it is not neckless.; sent6 & sent7 -> int5: that the nan strokes Worcestershire and it is cardiovascular does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it does stroke Worcestershire and is cardiovascular does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the Mexican is inclement. ; $context$ = sent1: the Mexican either is neckless or is inclement or both. sent2: the Mexican is not inclement if there is something such that the fact that it is neckless or destabilizes or both hold. sent3: the Mexican does stroke Sutherland. sent4: the clinic is neckless if the Guyanese is a kind of a pull. sent5: if the clinic is not neckless then the Mexican is a kind of a pull and it is inclement. sent6: if the nan does not destabilize then the fact that it does stroke Worcestershire and it is cardiovascular is not true. sent7: the nan does not destabilize. sent8: if there is something such that it destabilizes the Mexican is not inclement. sent9: the Mexican is inclement or is a pull or both. sent10: the clinic is either inclement or a pull or both. sent11: the sarsaparilla is clement. sent12: something is not neckless if the fact that it is neckless and it is cardiovascular is not true. sent13: if the clinic is a pull the Guyanese is neckless. sent14: the sole does prefigure. sent15: the clinic is not a kind of a paralogism. sent16: the clinic is inclement if the Mexican pulls. sent17: something does stroke subeditor or is amphitheatric or both. sent18: the Mexican is a kind of a pull and/or it is inclement. sent19: if there exists something such that it is neckless and/or it is inclement then the Mexican does not destabilize. sent20: the fact that the clinic is a pull is right. sent21: there exists something such that it is neckless or it is inclement or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent20 -> int1: the Guyanese is neckless.; int1 -> int2: the Guyanese either is neckless or does destabilize or both.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not necked and/or it does destabilize.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__