the dogfighter is not antrorse.
sent1: if the faience is soft thing that is a vaudeville then the fact that it is not antrorse is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the faience is not antrorse is not incorrect the dogfighter is a putamen and it is antrorse. sent3: if the faience is biliary and it is a conformist the fact that the fluoroform is not unexpansive is right. sent4: if a non-conformist thing is not non-biliary then it is a vaudeville. sent5: the mullein does not fidget semibreve. sent6: if something is Aberdonian and/or it levels Nanchang then it is not antrorse. sent7: if the faience is not unexpansive it is not a conformist and not non-biliary. sent8: if the mullein does not fidget semibreve it is a putamen and/or not non-biliary. sent9: that the faience is soft is not wrong if something that does not fidget semibreve is vaginal. sent10: something does not fidget semibreve and is vaginal. sent11: there exists something such that it does fidget semibreve and is vaginal. sent12: there is something such that it does not fidget semibreve. sent13: the faience is not unexpansive if the fact that the fluoroform does level Nanchang is not wrong. sent14: the fluoroform is Aberdonian and does level Nanchang. sent15: if the mullein is biliary then the faience is biliary. sent16: the fluoroform is not unexpansive if it is a vaudeville and Aberdonian. sent17: if the mullein is a putamen the faience is biliary. sent18: the faience is biliary if it is not unexpansive.
sent14 -> int1: the fluoroform does level Nanchang.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the faience is not unexpansive is not incorrect.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the faience is not a conformist and is biliary.; sent4 -> int4: if the faience is not conformist but it is biliary it is a kind of a vaudeville.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the faience is a vaudeville.; sent10 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the faience is soft is not false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the faience is soft and it is a vaudeville.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the faience is not antrorse.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the dogfighter is a putamen and it is antrorse.; int9 -> hypothesis;
that the dogfighter is non-antrorse hold.
sent6 -> int10: if the dogfighter is Aberdonian and/or it levels Nanchang it is not antrorse.; sent8 & sent5 -> int11: the mullein is a putamen and/or it is biliary.; int11 & sent17 & sent15 -> int12: that the faience is biliary is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the dogfighter is not antrorse. ; $context$ = sent1: if the faience is soft thing that is a vaudeville then the fact that it is not antrorse is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the faience is not antrorse is not incorrect the dogfighter is a putamen and it is antrorse. sent3: if the faience is biliary and it is a conformist the fact that the fluoroform is not unexpansive is right. sent4: if a non-conformist thing is not non-biliary then it is a vaudeville. sent5: the mullein does not fidget semibreve. sent6: if something is Aberdonian and/or it levels Nanchang then it is not antrorse. sent7: if the faience is not unexpansive it is not a conformist and not non-biliary. sent8: if the mullein does not fidget semibreve it is a putamen and/or not non-biliary. sent9: that the faience is soft is not wrong if something that does not fidget semibreve is vaginal. sent10: something does not fidget semibreve and is vaginal. sent11: there exists something such that it does fidget semibreve and is vaginal. sent12: there is something such that it does not fidget semibreve. sent13: the faience is not unexpansive if the fact that the fluoroform does level Nanchang is not wrong. sent14: the fluoroform is Aberdonian and does level Nanchang. sent15: if the mullein is biliary then the faience is biliary. sent16: the fluoroform is not unexpansive if it is a vaudeville and Aberdonian. sent17: if the mullein is a putamen the faience is biliary. sent18: the faience is biliary if it is not unexpansive. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the fluoroform does level Nanchang.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the faience is not unexpansive is not incorrect.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the faience is not a conformist and is biliary.; sent4 -> int4: if the faience is not conformist but it is biliary it is a kind of a vaudeville.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the faience is a vaudeville.; sent10 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the faience is soft is not false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the faience is soft and it is a vaudeville.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the faience is not antrorse.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the dogfighter is a putamen and it is antrorse.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__