the sawhorse is not a teff.
sent1: the yacht is not earless. sent2: something does not excel ilang-ilang if that it is a kind of Jain thing that owes is not right. sent3: if the fact that the sawhorse is a kind of chaetognathan thing that is not a boot is not right it is not a molluscum. sent4: if that the watchmaker excels diary and is not topological is wrong then it does not excels diary. sent5: if the watchmaker is a kind of a Photostat then the broad does abscond. sent6: everything is non-subclinical. sent7: the broad does abscond if the watchmaker does abscond. sent8: if something that is not a kind of a truancy does abscond it does not prioritize monopoly. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of chaetognathan thing that is not a boot does not hold if it is not a kind of a teff. sent10: the fact that the topside is a molluscum that does prioritize monopoly is false if there exists something such that it does not prioritize monopoly. sent11: the sawhorse does prioritize monopoly. sent12: if the sawhorse is not a molluscum then it does not prioritize monopoly. sent13: the fact that something is Jain and does owe is not correct if it is not subclinical. sent14: The monopoly does prioritize sawhorse. sent15: that the sawhorse boots but it is not a factor is not correct. sent16: if there is something such that it is a photosensitivity then that the watchmaker does excel diary and is not topological is incorrect. sent17: if that the osteoblast does heft urologist does not hold it is not chaetognathan. sent18: if the sawhorse does boot then the fact that it is not a kind of a molluscum hold. sent19: something that does not excel diary is a Photostat and/or absconds. sent20: that that the jodhpur prioritizes monopoly and does cohere Psilotum does not hold hold if it does not excel ilang-ilang. sent21: that the broad is not a truancy is not incorrect if the cabalist does not excel ilang-ilang. sent22: that the yacht does cohere Linum but it is not a kind of a photosensitivity is not true if it is not earless. sent23: if the fact that something is a kind of a molluscum and it does prioritize monopoly is not right it is not a teff. sent24: if there exists something such that that it coheres Linum and it is not a photosensitivity is not true the albuterol is a kind of a photosensitivity.
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the sawhorse is chaetognathan but not a boot is false if it is not a kind of a teff.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sawhorse is not a kind of a teff.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the sawhorse is chaetognathan but it is not a kind of a boot is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the sawhorse is not a kind of a molluscum.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: that the sawhorse does not prioritize monopoly is right.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the topside is not a teff is not false.
sent23 -> int6: the topside is not a kind of a teff if the fact that it is a kind of a molluscum and it prioritizes monopoly does not hold.; sent8 -> int7: if the broad is not a truancy but it absconds it does not prioritize monopoly.; sent22 & sent1 -> int8: the fact that the yacht does cohere Linum and is not a kind of a photosensitivity is false.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that the fact that it does cohere Linum and it is not a kind of a photosensitivity is not right.; int9 & sent24 -> int10: the albuterol is a photosensitivity.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is a kind of a photosensitivity.; sent16 & int11 -> int12: that the watchmaker does excel diary but it is not topological does not hold.; int12 & sent4 -> int13: the watchmaker does not excel diary.; sent19 -> int14: the watchmaker is a Photostat and/or does abscond if it does not excel diary.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the watchmaker is a kind of a Photostat and/or it absconds.; sent5 & sent7 & int15 -> int16: the broad absconds.; sent6 -> int17: the napery is not subclinical.; sent13 -> int18: the fact that the fact that the napery is Jain and it does owe is not right is correct if it is not subclinical.; int17 & int18 -> int19: the fact that the napery is a kind of Jain thing that owes is not true.; int19 -> int20: there exists nothing such that it is Jain and owes.; int20 -> int21: that the cabalist is a kind of Jain thing that owes is wrong.; sent2 -> int22: if the fact that the cabalist is Jain and it does owe is not correct it does not excel ilang-ilang.; int21 & int22 -> int23: the cabalist does not excel ilang-ilang.; int23 & sent21 -> int24: the broad is not a truancy.; int16 & int24 -> int25: the broad is not a truancy but it absconds.; int7 & int25 -> int26: the broad does not prioritize monopoly.; int26 -> int27: there is something such that it does not prioritize monopoly.; int27 & sent10 -> int28: the fact that the topside is a molluscum and prioritizes monopoly does not hold.; int6 & int28 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sawhorse is not a teff. ; $context$ = sent1: the yacht is not earless. sent2: something does not excel ilang-ilang if that it is a kind of Jain thing that owes is not right. sent3: if the fact that the sawhorse is a kind of chaetognathan thing that is not a boot is not right it is not a molluscum. sent4: if that the watchmaker excels diary and is not topological is wrong then it does not excels diary. sent5: if the watchmaker is a kind of a Photostat then the broad does abscond. sent6: everything is non-subclinical. sent7: the broad does abscond if the watchmaker does abscond. sent8: if something that is not a kind of a truancy does abscond it does not prioritize monopoly. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of chaetognathan thing that is not a boot does not hold if it is not a kind of a teff. sent10: the fact that the topside is a molluscum that does prioritize monopoly is false if there exists something such that it does not prioritize monopoly. sent11: the sawhorse does prioritize monopoly. sent12: if the sawhorse is not a molluscum then it does not prioritize monopoly. sent13: the fact that something is Jain and does owe is not correct if it is not subclinical. sent14: The monopoly does prioritize sawhorse. sent15: that the sawhorse boots but it is not a factor is not correct. sent16: if there is something such that it is a photosensitivity then that the watchmaker does excel diary and is not topological is incorrect. sent17: if that the osteoblast does heft urologist does not hold it is not chaetognathan. sent18: if the sawhorse does boot then the fact that it is not a kind of a molluscum hold. sent19: something that does not excel diary is a Photostat and/or absconds. sent20: that that the jodhpur prioritizes monopoly and does cohere Psilotum does not hold hold if it does not excel ilang-ilang. sent21: that the broad is not a truancy is not incorrect if the cabalist does not excel ilang-ilang. sent22: that the yacht does cohere Linum but it is not a kind of a photosensitivity is not true if it is not earless. sent23: if the fact that something is a kind of a molluscum and it does prioritize monopoly is not right it is not a teff. sent24: if there exists something such that that it coheres Linum and it is not a photosensitivity is not true the albuterol is a kind of a photosensitivity. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the sawhorse is chaetognathan but not a boot is false if it is not a kind of a teff.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sawhorse is not a kind of a teff.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the sawhorse is chaetognathan but it is not a kind of a boot is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the sawhorse is not a kind of a molluscum.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: that the sawhorse does not prioritize monopoly is right.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__