the Parks does not govern cattalo.
sent1: the tractor is non-Tudor if the Parks is a periodical and governs cattalo. sent2: the incompetent is concentric if it governs lode. sent3: the incompetent governs lode. sent4: The lode governs incompetent. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that either it is retrorse or it is a plier or both is not correct then the Parks is a periodical. sent6: the tractor is a Tudor if the fact that the incompetent is concentric is correct. sent7: that the Galliano is retrorse and/or a plier is incorrect. sent8: the incompetent does duplicate. sent9: if something duplicates that it is a kind of concentric thing that is not a zinfandel is wrong. sent10: if the fact that something is concentric thing that is not a kind of a zinfandel does not hold it is a kind of a Tudor.
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is retrorse and/or it is a plier does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the Parks is a periodical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Parks does govern cattalo.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Parks is a kind of a periodical that does govern cattalo.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the tractor is non-Tudor.; sent2 & sent3 -> int5: the incompetent is concentric.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the tractor is not non-Tudor.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Parks does not govern lode.
sent10 -> int8: if that the incompetent is concentric thing that is not a kind of a zinfandel is not correct then it is a Tudor.; sent9 -> int9: the fact that the incompetent is concentric and is not a zinfandel is not correct if it is a duplicate.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: that the incompetent is concentric but it is not a zinfandel is false.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the incompetent is a Tudor.; int11 -> int12: something is a Tudor.;
$hypothesis$ = the Parks does not govern cattalo. ; $context$ = sent1: the tractor is non-Tudor if the Parks is a periodical and governs cattalo. sent2: the incompetent is concentric if it governs lode. sent3: the incompetent governs lode. sent4: The lode governs incompetent. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that either it is retrorse or it is a plier or both is not correct then the Parks is a periodical. sent6: the tractor is a Tudor if the fact that the incompetent is concentric is correct. sent7: that the Galliano is retrorse and/or a plier is incorrect. sent8: the incompetent does duplicate. sent9: if something duplicates that it is a kind of concentric thing that is not a zinfandel is wrong. sent10: if the fact that something is concentric thing that is not a kind of a zinfandel does not hold it is a kind of a Tudor. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is retrorse and/or it is a plier does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the Parks is a periodical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Parks does govern cattalo.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Parks is a kind of a periodical that does govern cattalo.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the tractor is non-Tudor.; sent2 & sent3 -> int5: the incompetent is concentric.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the tractor is not non-Tudor.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__