the mill puffs.
sent1: if something is not an equator but it is a Barbarossa it is not unretentive. sent2: if the jumper is a rusticity then that the fruitcake is not a kind of a rusticity but it does condition is false. sent3: something is a rusticity if the fact that it is a proselyte that does not wail is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that something wails hold then that it is a rusticity is not incorrect. sent5: either something is a rusticity or it is not an undercut or both if it is a conditioned. sent6: if the fact that the mill is both not a puffing and a Junkers is not right then the fact that it does condition is true. sent7: the stairway is not a puffing. sent8: something conditions if the fact that it is not a talentlessness and is not a kind of a Junkers is not correct. sent9: something is not a kind of a gendarmerie but it is glottochronological if it is not parietal. sent10: the fruitcake is a talentlessness. sent11: the mill is a conditioned. sent12: if the alprazolam is a shuffleboard it is an undercut. sent13: if something is not unretentive then that it is not a talentlessness and is not a kind of a Junkers does not hold. sent14: the mill is a Junkers. sent15: something is a puffing if that it is a rusticity hold. sent16: if the fruitcake is an undercut the bier is a talentlessness. sent17: if the mill is not an undercut but it is a kind of a Junkers it is not a kind of a puffing. sent18: if that something is not a rusticity but it is a Barbarossa is false then it is a rusticity. sent19: everything is not parietal. sent20: the fruitcake does not notch defenselessness if it is not a kind of a gendarmerie and it is glottochronological. sent21: if that the fruitcake is a talentlessness is true it is not a rusticity and it does condition. sent22: if the jumper is a proselyte that does not wail then the mill is not an undercut. sent23: the mill is not an equator and is a Barbarossa if there is something such that it does not notch defenselessness.
sent3 -> int1: if the fact that the jumper is a proselyte that does not wail is wrong it is a kind of a rusticity.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the jumper is a proselyte but it does not wail does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the jumper is a rusticity is true.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that that the fruitcake is not a kind of a rusticity but it conditions hold is not right.; sent21 & sent10 -> int4: the fruitcake is not a rusticity and is a conditioned.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the jumper is a proselyte but it does not wail.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the mill is not an undercut.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the mill is not an undercut but a Junkers.; int8 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the bier is a talentlessness.
sent18 -> int9: if that the mill is not a kind of a rusticity and is a Barbarossa does not hold it is a rusticity.;
$hypothesis$ = the mill puffs. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not an equator but it is a Barbarossa it is not unretentive. sent2: if the jumper is a rusticity then that the fruitcake is not a kind of a rusticity but it does condition is false. sent3: something is a rusticity if the fact that it is a proselyte that does not wail is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that something wails hold then that it is a rusticity is not incorrect. sent5: either something is a rusticity or it is not an undercut or both if it is a conditioned. sent6: if the fact that the mill is both not a puffing and a Junkers is not right then the fact that it does condition is true. sent7: the stairway is not a puffing. sent8: something conditions if the fact that it is not a talentlessness and is not a kind of a Junkers is not correct. sent9: something is not a kind of a gendarmerie but it is glottochronological if it is not parietal. sent10: the fruitcake is a talentlessness. sent11: the mill is a conditioned. sent12: if the alprazolam is a shuffleboard it is an undercut. sent13: if something is not unretentive then that it is not a talentlessness and is not a kind of a Junkers does not hold. sent14: the mill is a Junkers. sent15: something is a puffing if that it is a rusticity hold. sent16: if the fruitcake is an undercut the bier is a talentlessness. sent17: if the mill is not an undercut but it is a kind of a Junkers it is not a kind of a puffing. sent18: if that something is not a rusticity but it is a Barbarossa is false then it is a rusticity. sent19: everything is not parietal. sent20: the fruitcake does not notch defenselessness if it is not a kind of a gendarmerie and it is glottochronological. sent21: if that the fruitcake is a talentlessness is true it is not a rusticity and it does condition. sent22: if the jumper is a proselyte that does not wail then the mill is not an undercut. sent23: the mill is not an equator and is a Barbarossa if there is something such that it does not notch defenselessness. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the fact that the jumper is a proselyte that does not wail is wrong it is a kind of a rusticity.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the jumper is a proselyte but it does not wail does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the jumper is a rusticity is true.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that that the fruitcake is not a kind of a rusticity but it conditions hold is not right.; sent21 & sent10 -> int4: the fruitcake is not a rusticity and is a conditioned.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the jumper is a proselyte but it does not wail.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the mill is not an undercut.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the mill is not an undercut but a Junkers.; int8 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__