the triangulating and the devoting happens.
sent1: both the manliness and the Aleutianness occurs. sent2: both the royalness and the leasing phagocyte occurs. sent3: that the immunoassay but not the leasing militarist occurs is false if the fact that the triangulating does not occur hold. sent4: the elaborating braided does not occur if that the indeterminableness but not the leasing care happens is wrong. sent5: if the axing follower occurs and/or the immunoassay occurs the leasing militarist does not occur. sent6: that the royalness does not occur is triggered by that the indeterminableness and the leasing care occurs. sent7: if both the royal and the elaborating braided happens then the brokering does not occur. sent8: that the expatiation and the nonterritorialness happens is true if the stealing does not occur. sent9: if the leasing militarist does not occur then the triangulating happens. sent10: that the devoting occurs is triggered by the nonterritorialness. sent11: if the elaborating braided does not occur then the axing follower occurs. sent12: the fact that the stealing does not occur is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the indeterminableness occurs and the leasing care does not occur.; sent2 -> int1: that the royal occurs is not incorrect.; sent8 & sent12 -> int2: both the expatiation and the nonterritorialness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the nonterritorialness occurs.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the devoting happens.;
the brokering does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the triangulating and the devoting happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the manliness and the Aleutianness occurs. sent2: both the royalness and the leasing phagocyte occurs. sent3: that the immunoassay but not the leasing militarist occurs is false if the fact that the triangulating does not occur hold. sent4: the elaborating braided does not occur if that the indeterminableness but not the leasing care happens is wrong. sent5: if the axing follower occurs and/or the immunoassay occurs the leasing militarist does not occur. sent6: that the royalness does not occur is triggered by that the indeterminableness and the leasing care occurs. sent7: if both the royal and the elaborating braided happens then the brokering does not occur. sent8: that the expatiation and the nonterritorialness happens is true if the stealing does not occur. sent9: if the leasing militarist does not occur then the triangulating happens. sent10: that the devoting occurs is triggered by the nonterritorialness. sent11: if the elaborating braided does not occur then the axing follower occurs. sent12: the fact that the stealing does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the indeterminableness occurs and the leasing care does not occur.; sent2 -> int1: that the royal occurs is not incorrect.; sent8 & sent12 -> int2: both the expatiation and the nonterritorialness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the nonterritorialness occurs.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the devoting happens.; __UNKNOWN__