the nutlet is a C-section and is a kind of a bragger.
sent1: if something is not leonine and it is not diplomatic then the fact that it is not genial is not wrong. sent2: if that that the usufructuary is not ataxic and not a C-section is right is wrong then it is a C-section. sent3: if the usufructuary is a C-section the blanc is non-leonine and it is not diplomatic. sent4: the fact that the nutlet is a bragger is correct. sent5: something is ataxic. sent6: the nutlet is a magneton if the fact that the imposter is leonine is not wrong. sent7: the imposter is leonine if that the usufructuary is not a Ulex but it is homologous is incorrect. sent8: something is genial if it is diplomatic. sent9: the usufructuary is diplomatic if it is not a kind of a Ulex and it is homologous. sent10: if something is not non-ataxic then the usufructuary is not genial. sent11: something is imperfect and is a magneton if it is not genial. sent12: the nutlet is a C-section if it is a magneton.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the usufructuary is not a Ulex but it is homologous.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the usufructuary is diplomatic.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the usufructuary is genial if the usufructuary is diplomatic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the usufructuary is genial.; sent5 & sent10 -> int4: the usufructuary is not genial.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the usufructuary is not a kind of a Ulex and is homologous is not right.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the imposter is leonine.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the nutlet is a magneton.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the nutlet is a C-section.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the blanc is imperfect and a magneton.
sent11 -> int10: the blanc is imperfect and it is a magneton if it is non-genial.; sent1 -> int11: the blanc is not genial if it is both not leonine and not diplomatic.;
$hypothesis$ = the nutlet is a C-section and is a kind of a bragger. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not leonine and it is not diplomatic then the fact that it is not genial is not wrong. sent2: if that that the usufructuary is not ataxic and not a C-section is right is wrong then it is a C-section. sent3: if the usufructuary is a C-section the blanc is non-leonine and it is not diplomatic. sent4: the fact that the nutlet is a bragger is correct. sent5: something is ataxic. sent6: the nutlet is a magneton if the fact that the imposter is leonine is not wrong. sent7: the imposter is leonine if that the usufructuary is not a Ulex but it is homologous is incorrect. sent8: something is genial if it is diplomatic. sent9: the usufructuary is diplomatic if it is not a kind of a Ulex and it is homologous. sent10: if something is not non-ataxic then the usufructuary is not genial. sent11: something is imperfect and is a magneton if it is not genial. sent12: the nutlet is a C-section if it is a magneton. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the usufructuary is not a Ulex but it is homologous.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the usufructuary is diplomatic.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the usufructuary is genial if the usufructuary is diplomatic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the usufructuary is genial.; sent5 & sent10 -> int4: the usufructuary is not genial.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the usufructuary is not a kind of a Ulex and is homologous is not right.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the imposter is leonine.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the nutlet is a magneton.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the nutlet is a C-section.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__