that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Cleveland and it is not non-mandibulofacial it does not crop acinus is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a fornication and it is Gregorian then it is not a vascularization. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Ellison and it does hum it is not a kind of an annihilation. sent3: the convalescent is not a slipknot if that it does crop bicker and swaggers is not incorrect. sent4: the convalescent is not psycholinguistics if it bullshits Capricornus and does crop acinus. sent5: there exists something such that if it does disconnect and crops sewage then it is not a kind of a roly-poly. sent6: there is something such that if it is administrative and it is stannic it is not a sexploitation. sent7: if the convalescent is a kind of a Cleveland and it is mandibulofacial then it does not crop acinus. sent8: if the convalescent is stannic and does anticipate headlight then it is not a show. sent9: if the convalescent is a Cleveland and it is mandibulofacial it crops acinus. sent10: the convalescent is not mandibulofacial if it does rectify and it is Eurafrican. sent11: the labyrinth is not a Cleveland if it is early and a S. sent12: if something is acarpelous and it is a proconsul it is not a kind of a Cleveland. sent13: if something that is stimulative is a ultramontane then it is not a kind of a stump. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a hieratic and it vamps it is not shallow. sent15: there is something such that if it is both a trampoline and a indigenousness then it is not a hum. sent16: there is something such that if it is a Cleveland and it is mandibulofacial then the fact that it crops acinus is right. sent17: the fact that the convalescent does not seize hold if that it is a Cleveland and it exchanges is right. sent18: there exists something such that if it does anticipate fissure and is acarpelous then it is not a regnellidium. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not non-ratlike but critical the fact that it is not a kind of a railing is right. sent20: there exists something such that if it is bolographic and is a willing then it does not derive.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
the condor is not a kind of a Cleveland if it is acarpelous and is a proconsul.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Cleveland and it is not non-mandibulofacial it does not crop acinus is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a fornication and it is Gregorian then it is not a vascularization. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Ellison and it does hum it is not a kind of an annihilation. sent3: the convalescent is not a slipknot if that it does crop bicker and swaggers is not incorrect. sent4: the convalescent is not psycholinguistics if it bullshits Capricornus and does crop acinus. sent5: there exists something such that if it does disconnect and crops sewage then it is not a kind of a roly-poly. sent6: there is something such that if it is administrative and it is stannic it is not a sexploitation. sent7: if the convalescent is a kind of a Cleveland and it is mandibulofacial then it does not crop acinus. sent8: if the convalescent is stannic and does anticipate headlight then it is not a show. sent9: if the convalescent is a Cleveland and it is mandibulofacial it crops acinus. sent10: the convalescent is not mandibulofacial if it does rectify and it is Eurafrican. sent11: the labyrinth is not a Cleveland if it is early and a S. sent12: if something is acarpelous and it is a proconsul it is not a kind of a Cleveland. sent13: if something that is stimulative is a ultramontane then it is not a kind of a stump. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a hieratic and it vamps it is not shallow. sent15: there is something such that if it is both a trampoline and a indigenousness then it is not a hum. sent16: there is something such that if it is a Cleveland and it is mandibulofacial then the fact that it crops acinus is right. sent17: the fact that the convalescent does not seize hold if that it is a Cleveland and it exchanges is right. sent18: there exists something such that if it does anticipate fissure and is acarpelous then it is not a regnellidium. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not non-ratlike but critical the fact that it is not a kind of a railing is right. sent20: there exists something such that if it is bolographic and is a willing then it does not derive. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__