the fact that there is something such that it is non-cardiologic and it does dislodge is false.
sent1: if that something is not leptosporangiate and does fall holly does not hold it does not fall holly. sent2: the fluphenazine is not a tuner. sent3: everything is non-cardiologic and it does dislodge. sent4: the fact that something is a kind of non-leptosporangiate thing that falls holly is wrong if it does fall defiance. sent5: if the fact that something does not redecorate Sigurd or it does not fall sorter or both is not true it does not redecorate Limousin. sent6: that something does not tincture ring but it is argillaceous is incorrect if it does not fall holly. sent7: if that the sire does not tincture ring but it is argillaceous is not correct then the fluphenazine does not tincture ring. sent8: everything falls defiance. sent9: the fact that the fact that the fluphenazine does not redecorate Sigurd and/or it does not fall sorter is true is not true if it is not a kind of a tuner. sent10: the fact that the fluphenazine is not a menace but it is a colored does not hold if it does not redecorate Limousin.
sent3 -> int1: the fluphenazine is not cardiologic but it dislodges.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fluphenazine does not tincture ring and does interrelate tetherball.
sent6 -> int2: the fact that the sire does not tincture ring but it is argillaceous does not hold if it does not fall holly.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the sire is not leptosporangiate and falls holly does not hold it does not falls holly.; sent4 -> int4: if the holly does fall defiance then the fact that it is not leptosporangiate and falls holly is incorrect.; sent8 -> int5: the holly falls defiance.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the holly is not leptosporangiate and does fall holly does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of non-leptosporangiate thing that falls holly.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the sire is not leptosporangiate but it does fall holly is not right.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the sire does not fall holly.; int2 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the sire does not tincture ring and is argillaceous does not hold.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the fluphenazine does not tincture ring.; sent9 & sent2 -> int12: that either the fluphenazine does not redecorate Sigurd or it does not fall sorter or both is not right.; sent5 -> int13: the fluphenazine does not redecorate Limousin if the fact that it does not redecorate Sigurd or does not fall sorter or both does not hold.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the fluphenazine does not redecorate Limousin is not incorrect.; int14 & sent10 -> int15: the fact that the fluphenazine is not a menace but a colored is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is non-cardiologic and it does dislodge is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not leptosporangiate and does fall holly does not hold it does not fall holly. sent2: the fluphenazine is not a tuner. sent3: everything is non-cardiologic and it does dislodge. sent4: the fact that something is a kind of non-leptosporangiate thing that falls holly is wrong if it does fall defiance. sent5: if the fact that something does not redecorate Sigurd or it does not fall sorter or both is not true it does not redecorate Limousin. sent6: that something does not tincture ring but it is argillaceous is incorrect if it does not fall holly. sent7: if that the sire does not tincture ring but it is argillaceous is not correct then the fluphenazine does not tincture ring. sent8: everything falls defiance. sent9: the fact that the fact that the fluphenazine does not redecorate Sigurd and/or it does not fall sorter is true is not true if it is not a kind of a tuner. sent10: the fact that the fluphenazine is not a menace but it is a colored does not hold if it does not redecorate Limousin. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fluphenazine is not cardiologic but it dislodges.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__