the intercom is cervine.
sent1: if the intercom is not cervine then the pilewort investigates sunfish and does receipt. sent2: that the Plantation is non-cervine hold. sent3: if that the halftone is not a catastrophe but it investigates sunfish is not right it is not a Nyala. sent4: if the pilewort investigates sunfish that the sensationalist does not investigates sunfish and investigates howler is not wrong. sent5: the pilewort is not cervine. sent6: the miterwort is not a dripping if the fact that it is both not unfrozen and a pulp is wrong. sent7: the pilewort does receipt. sent8: the intercom is not an overkill and is wheelless. sent9: that the sensationalist is a substantive and structures does not hold. sent10: if the intercom is not cervine then the pilewort is a kind of a receipt. sent11: the sensationalist does not sparkle tot. sent12: if something does not investigate sunfish and investigates howler it compacts unwieldiness. sent13: the fact that the sensationalist does not compact unwieldiness is not wrong if the fact that it is not substantive and is a structured is wrong. sent14: that the sensationalist is not alkaloidal but it does compact miterwort does not hold. sent15: the fact that the sensationalist does investigate howler if the pilewort investigates sunfish is correct. sent16: the intercom is a mittelschmerz and not non-actinomorphic. sent17: if that the sensationalist is substantive is not incorrect it does not compact unwieldiness. sent18: the clomipramine does not investigate howler. sent19: the sensationalist does investigate howler. sent20: if something does not compact unwieldiness but it investigates howler it does receipt.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intercom is not cervine.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the pilewort investigates sunfish and it receipts.; int1 -> int2: that the pilewort investigates sunfish hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the sensationalist does not investigate sunfish but it does investigate howler.; sent12 -> int4: the fact that if the sensationalist does not investigate sunfish and investigates howler then the sensationalist compacts unwieldiness hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sensationalist does compact unwieldiness.;
$hypothesis$ = the intercom is cervine. ; $context$ = sent1: if the intercom is not cervine then the pilewort investigates sunfish and does receipt. sent2: that the Plantation is non-cervine hold. sent3: if that the halftone is not a catastrophe but it investigates sunfish is not right it is not a Nyala. sent4: if the pilewort investigates sunfish that the sensationalist does not investigates sunfish and investigates howler is not wrong. sent5: the pilewort is not cervine. sent6: the miterwort is not a dripping if the fact that it is both not unfrozen and a pulp is wrong. sent7: the pilewort does receipt. sent8: the intercom is not an overkill and is wheelless. sent9: that the sensationalist is a substantive and structures does not hold. sent10: if the intercom is not cervine then the pilewort is a kind of a receipt. sent11: the sensationalist does not sparkle tot. sent12: if something does not investigate sunfish and investigates howler it compacts unwieldiness. sent13: the fact that the sensationalist does not compact unwieldiness is not wrong if the fact that it is not substantive and is a structured is wrong. sent14: that the sensationalist is not alkaloidal but it does compact miterwort does not hold. sent15: the fact that the sensationalist does investigate howler if the pilewort investigates sunfish is correct. sent16: the intercom is a mittelschmerz and not non-actinomorphic. sent17: if that the sensationalist is substantive is not incorrect it does not compact unwieldiness. sent18: the clomipramine does not investigate howler. sent19: the sensationalist does investigate howler. sent20: if something does not compact unwieldiness but it investigates howler it does receipt. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intercom is not cervine.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the pilewort investigates sunfish and it receipts.; int1 -> int2: that the pilewort investigates sunfish hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the sensationalist does not investigate sunfish but it does investigate howler.; sent12 -> int4: the fact that if the sensationalist does not investigate sunfish and investigates howler then the sensationalist compacts unwieldiness hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sensationalist does compact unwieldiness.; __UNKNOWN__