the maisonette is not a Limulus but it is amphibious.
sent1: the immunoglobulin is not amphibious if the motion is not a kind of an instrument and is nonresidential. sent2: if the fact that the bacchant is not amphibious and it is not nonresidential is not true the maisonette is not nonresidential. sent3: the velour is Tobagonian. sent4: if the fact that the velour does bestrew Tiepolo and/or it is not a Tobagonian is not correct then the motion encrimsons inaccessibility. sent5: the motion is nonresidential. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a sforzando and a Bowdler does not hold. sent7: if the motion is a kind of a sforzando that does encrimson inaccessibility then it is not a kind of an instrument. sent8: there is something such that it is not woody. sent9: if that the maisonette encrimsons inaccessibility hold then the motion is nonwoody. sent10: that the maisonette is not a kind of a Limulus but it is amphibious is not correct if the immunoglobulin is not amphibious. sent11: if there exists something such that it is nonwoody then that the velour either does bestrew Tiepolo or is not a Tobagonian or both is not correct. sent12: the velour is nonwoody if the motion is nonwoody. sent13: if something is not nonresidential it is a sforzando and/or an instrument. sent14: the motion is a sforzando if there is something such that the fact that it is not a sforzando and it is a Bowdler does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the velour bestrews Tiepolo and/or it is Tobagonian is not right is right the motion does encrimson inaccessibility. sent16: if that the velour is not woody is not false the fact that it bestrews Tiepolo and is not a Tobagonian is not correct.
sent8 & sent11 -> int1: that the velour does bestrew Tiepolo and/or is not a Tobagonian is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the motion encrimsons inaccessibility.; sent6 & sent14 -> int3: the motion is a kind of a sforzando.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the motion is a sforzando and it encrimsons inaccessibility.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the motion is not an instrument.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the motion is not a kind of an instrument but it is nonresidential.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: that the immunoglobulin is amphibious does not hold.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the immunoglobulin does not bestrew Tiepolo.
sent13 -> int8: the maisonette is a sforzando and/or it is an instrument if it is not nonresidential.;
$hypothesis$ = the maisonette is not a Limulus but it is amphibious. ; $context$ = sent1: the immunoglobulin is not amphibious if the motion is not a kind of an instrument and is nonresidential. sent2: if the fact that the bacchant is not amphibious and it is not nonresidential is not true the maisonette is not nonresidential. sent3: the velour is Tobagonian. sent4: if the fact that the velour does bestrew Tiepolo and/or it is not a Tobagonian is not correct then the motion encrimsons inaccessibility. sent5: the motion is nonresidential. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a sforzando and a Bowdler does not hold. sent7: if the motion is a kind of a sforzando that does encrimson inaccessibility then it is not a kind of an instrument. sent8: there is something such that it is not woody. sent9: if that the maisonette encrimsons inaccessibility hold then the motion is nonwoody. sent10: that the maisonette is not a kind of a Limulus but it is amphibious is not correct if the immunoglobulin is not amphibious. sent11: if there exists something such that it is nonwoody then that the velour either does bestrew Tiepolo or is not a Tobagonian or both is not correct. sent12: the velour is nonwoody if the motion is nonwoody. sent13: if something is not nonresidential it is a sforzando and/or an instrument. sent14: the motion is a sforzando if there is something such that the fact that it is not a sforzando and it is a Bowdler does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the velour bestrews Tiepolo and/or it is Tobagonian is not right is right the motion does encrimson inaccessibility. sent16: if that the velour is not woody is not false the fact that it bestrews Tiepolo and is not a Tobagonian is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent11 -> int1: that the velour does bestrew Tiepolo and/or is not a Tobagonian is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the motion encrimsons inaccessibility.; sent6 & sent14 -> int3: the motion is a kind of a sforzando.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the motion is a sforzando and it encrimsons inaccessibility.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the motion is not an instrument.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the motion is not a kind of an instrument but it is nonresidential.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: that the immunoglobulin is amphibious does not hold.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__