the cottontail does not guarantee folderol.
sent1: if something is not serologic it is not a syphilitic and is not a tacker. sent2: if something does process auto-mechanic that it is unseasonable and not a Tarsiidae is not true. sent3: if that the clam is a harmony and is not a Harlem does not hold that the influence is a cayenne is not false. sent4: there exists something such that it is unseasonable. sent5: the fact that the buckleya does dissent Lorenz but it is not unmanly does not hold. sent6: that the influence is an ad is right if that it is a cayenne is not wrong. sent7: the auto-mechanic is not unseasonable if something that does guarantee folderol is an ad. sent8: if something is not syphilitic then it dissents Lorenz and it is not unmanly. sent9: that the auto-mechanic is a kind of a brewer that is non-perennial is false if the buckleya is not harsh. sent10: if that something is a brewer but not perennial is wrong then it is not serologic. sent11: if the influence is not a Tarsiidae then the cottontail is a Tarsiidae and is a kind of a cayenne. sent12: everything is a tin and is a field. sent13: if there exists something such that it does dissent Rambouillet then the buckleya is not harsh. sent14: if something is a kind of a cayenne it is a kind of an ad. sent15: there is something such that that it is athletic and it is ostentatious is not correct. sent16: something dissents Rambouillet. sent17: the fact that the influence is not a Tarsiidae hold if there is something such that it is not ostentatious. sent18: something is an ad. sent19: if the clam processes auto-mechanic then the auto-mechanic is unseasonable. sent20: if something is a tin then the fact that it is a harmony and it is not a Harlem is wrong. sent21: something is not unmanly but it is a kind of an ad. sent22: if the influence is not a Tarsiidae then the cottontail is a kind of a Tarsiidae. sent23: the buckleya guarantees folderol. sent24: the influence is not a Tarsiidae if there is something such that that it is not athletic and it is ostentatious is not correct. sent25: if something that dissents Lorenz is not unmanly then it processes auto-mechanic. sent26: if that the buckleya does dissent Lorenz but it is not unmanly is incorrect that the clam does process auto-mechanic is true.
sent14 -> int1: if the cottontail is a cayenne then it is an ad.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cottontail guarantees folderol is right.; sent26 & sent5 -> int2: the clam processes auto-mechanic.; sent19 & int2 -> int3: the auto-mechanic is unseasonable.;
the cottontail does guarantee folderol.
sent25 -> int4: the auto-mechanic processes auto-mechanic if it dissents Lorenz and is not unmanly.; sent8 -> int5: the auto-mechanic does dissent Lorenz and is not unmanly if it is not a kind of a syphilitic.; sent13 & sent16 -> int6: the buckleya is not harsh.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the auto-mechanic is a brewer that is not a perennial is not correct.; sent10 -> int8: if the fact that the auto-mechanic is a kind of a brewer but it is not a kind of a perennial does not hold it is not serologic.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the auto-mechanic is not serologic.; sent1 -> int10: if the auto-mechanic is not serologic the fact that it is not a kind of a syphilitic and it is not a tacker hold.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the auto-mechanic is both not a syphilitic and not a tacker.; int11 -> int12: the auto-mechanic is not a syphilitic.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the auto-mechanic dissents Lorenz but it is not unmanly.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the auto-mechanic does process auto-mechanic.; sent2 -> int15: if the auto-mechanic processes auto-mechanic the fact that it is unseasonable and it is not a Tarsiidae is incorrect.; int14 & int15 -> int16: that the auto-mechanic is unseasonable but it is not a Tarsiidae is incorrect.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that that it is both unseasonable and not a Tarsiidae is not right.; sent20 -> int18: that the cologne is a kind of a harmony that is not a kind of a Harlem is false if that it is a kind of a tin is not incorrect.; sent12 -> int19: the broiler is a tin and a field.; int19 -> int20: the broiler does tin.; int20 -> int21: everything tins.; int21 -> int22: the cologne does tin.; int18 & int22 -> int23: that the cologne is a harmony but it is not a Harlem does not hold.; int23 -> int24: there exists nothing such that it is a harmony but not a Harlem.; int24 -> int25: that the fact that the clam is a harmony but it is not a Harlem is true is not right.; int25 & sent3 -> int26: the influence is a cayenne.; sent6 & int26 -> int27: the influence is an ad.;
$hypothesis$ = the cottontail does not guarantee folderol. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not serologic it is not a syphilitic and is not a tacker. sent2: if something does process auto-mechanic that it is unseasonable and not a Tarsiidae is not true. sent3: if that the clam is a harmony and is not a Harlem does not hold that the influence is a cayenne is not false. sent4: there exists something such that it is unseasonable. sent5: the fact that the buckleya does dissent Lorenz but it is not unmanly does not hold. sent6: that the influence is an ad is right if that it is a cayenne is not wrong. sent7: the auto-mechanic is not unseasonable if something that does guarantee folderol is an ad. sent8: if something is not syphilitic then it dissents Lorenz and it is not unmanly. sent9: that the auto-mechanic is a kind of a brewer that is non-perennial is false if the buckleya is not harsh. sent10: if that something is a brewer but not perennial is wrong then it is not serologic. sent11: if the influence is not a Tarsiidae then the cottontail is a Tarsiidae and is a kind of a cayenne. sent12: everything is a tin and is a field. sent13: if there exists something such that it does dissent Rambouillet then the buckleya is not harsh. sent14: if something is a kind of a cayenne it is a kind of an ad. sent15: there is something such that that it is athletic and it is ostentatious is not correct. sent16: something dissents Rambouillet. sent17: the fact that the influence is not a Tarsiidae hold if there is something such that it is not ostentatious. sent18: something is an ad. sent19: if the clam processes auto-mechanic then the auto-mechanic is unseasonable. sent20: if something is a tin then the fact that it is a harmony and it is not a Harlem is wrong. sent21: something is not unmanly but it is a kind of an ad. sent22: if the influence is not a Tarsiidae then the cottontail is a kind of a Tarsiidae. sent23: the buckleya guarantees folderol. sent24: the influence is not a Tarsiidae if there is something such that that it is not athletic and it is ostentatious is not correct. sent25: if something that dissents Lorenz is not unmanly then it processes auto-mechanic. sent26: if that the buckleya does dissent Lorenz but it is not unmanly is incorrect that the clam does process auto-mechanic is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the cottontail is a cayenne then it is an ad.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cottontail guarantees folderol is right.; sent26 & sent5 -> int2: the clam processes auto-mechanic.; sent19 & int2 -> int3: the auto-mechanic is unseasonable.; __UNKNOWN__