there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a dot and it does not launch airmailer is not true then it is incoherent.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a dot and does not launch airmailer it is incoherent. sent2: if the airmailer does not dot it is incoherent. sent3: the airmailer is incoherent if the fact that it is a dot and it does launch airmailer is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a dot it is incoherent. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is a dot and it does launch airmailer is not true the fact that it is incoherent is right. sent6: if that the airmailer is a dot that does not launch airmailer does not hold then it is incoherent. sent7: if that something collects navel but it is not a primo does not hold then it does collect lathi.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it does collect navel and it is not a primo is false it collects lathi.
sent7 -> int1: that the octant collects lathi is not false if the fact that it does collect navel and it is not a primo is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a dot and it does not launch airmailer is not true then it is incoherent. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a dot and does not launch airmailer it is incoherent. sent2: if the airmailer does not dot it is incoherent. sent3: the airmailer is incoherent if the fact that it is a dot and it does launch airmailer is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a dot it is incoherent. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is a dot and it does launch airmailer is not true the fact that it is incoherent is right. sent6: if that the airmailer is a dot that does not launch airmailer does not hold then it is incoherent. sent7: if that something collects navel but it is not a primo does not hold then it does collect lathi. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__