the punctuation happens.
sent1: the checkering does not occur and the wester does not occur. sent2: that the unpriestliness does not occur is prevented by that the moderating does not occur or the sacrament or both. sent3: the fatigue happens and the junketing does not occur. sent4: the scuffle occurs and the turbulence happens. sent5: the punctuation does not occur if the chance-medley does not occur. sent6: the sacrament does not occur if the moderating occurs. sent7: that the sacrament does not occur results in that the roundhouse occurs. sent8: both the slipperiness and the illegibleness happens. sent9: the moderateness does not occur if the exculpatoriness but not the separationism happens. sent10: that the unpriestliness occurs is prevented by that not the checkering but the slipperiness happens. sent11: the fact that the exculpatoriness happens and the separationism occurs is false. sent12: if the fact that the exculpatoriness happens but the separationism does not occur is false then the chance-medley does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exculpatoriness but not the separationism happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the moderateness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the moderateness does not occur and/or the sacrament occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the unpriestliness occurs.; sent1 -> int4: the checkering does not occur.; sent8 -> int5: the fact that the slipperiness happens is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the checkering does not occur but the slipperiness occurs.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the unpriestliness does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the fact that the exculpatoriness but not the separationism happens is right is false.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the chance-medley does not occur.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the roundhouse happens.
$hypothesis$ = the punctuation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the checkering does not occur and the wester does not occur. sent2: that the unpriestliness does not occur is prevented by that the moderating does not occur or the sacrament or both. sent3: the fatigue happens and the junketing does not occur. sent4: the scuffle occurs and the turbulence happens. sent5: the punctuation does not occur if the chance-medley does not occur. sent6: the sacrament does not occur if the moderating occurs. sent7: that the sacrament does not occur results in that the roundhouse occurs. sent8: both the slipperiness and the illegibleness happens. sent9: the moderateness does not occur if the exculpatoriness but not the separationism happens. sent10: that the unpriestliness occurs is prevented by that not the checkering but the slipperiness happens. sent11: the fact that the exculpatoriness happens and the separationism occurs is false. sent12: if the fact that the exculpatoriness happens but the separationism does not occur is false then the chance-medley does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exculpatoriness but not the separationism happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the moderateness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the moderateness does not occur and/or the sacrament occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the unpriestliness occurs.; sent1 -> int4: the checkering does not occur.; sent8 -> int5: the fact that the slipperiness happens is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the checkering does not occur but the slipperiness occurs.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the unpriestliness does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the fact that the exculpatoriness but not the separationism happens is right is false.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the chance-medley does not occur.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__