the bespangling Urodella but not the psalmody occurs.
sent1: the pediatricsness occurs. sent2: the chronicness does not occur. sent3: that the discrimination does not occur and the intracellularness does not occur does not hold if the chronicness does not occur. sent4: that the psalmody does not occur is caused by that the crosstalk happens and/or the electromotiveness. sent5: if that the discrimination does not occur and the intracellularness does not occur is wrong then the bespangling Urodella happens. sent6: that the destining agrapha does not occur yields that the pediatricsness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the crosstalk does not occur hold.; sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the discrimination does not occur and the intracellularness does not occur is wrong.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the bespangling Urodella happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the bespangling Urodella but not the psalmody occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the pediatricsness occurs. sent2: the chronicness does not occur. sent3: that the discrimination does not occur and the intracellularness does not occur does not hold if the chronicness does not occur. sent4: that the psalmody does not occur is caused by that the crosstalk happens and/or the electromotiveness. sent5: if that the discrimination does not occur and the intracellularness does not occur is wrong then the bespangling Urodella happens. sent6: that the destining agrapha does not occur yields that the pediatricsness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the crosstalk does not occur hold.; sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the discrimination does not occur and the intracellularness does not occur is wrong.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the bespangling Urodella happens.; __UNKNOWN__