the unpreventableness is prevented by that the adoption occurs but the abdominal does not occur.
sent1: the unbarring spectinomycin does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the non-abdominalness and the recce happens is not correct. sent3: that the algebraicness occurs is true. sent4: that the meagerness does not occur if the radiating does not occur is not false. sent5: that the tonicness does not occur is caused by that the pin happens and the sizing does not occur. sent6: the duster happens. sent7: the feature does not occur. sent8: that the hackwork does not occur is correct. sent9: the unargumentativeness happens but the retrenchment does not occur. sent10: the unbarring oilcloth does not occur. sent11: that not the sizing but the inconvenientness occurs does not hold. sent12: the ebbtide does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the adoption and the non-abdominalness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the abdominal does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the recce happens is not false.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the abdominalness does not occur but the recce occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the recce does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the unpreventableness is prevented by that the adoption occurs but the abdominal does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the unbarring spectinomycin does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the non-abdominalness and the recce happens is not correct. sent3: that the algebraicness occurs is true. sent4: that the meagerness does not occur if the radiating does not occur is not false. sent5: that the tonicness does not occur is caused by that the pin happens and the sizing does not occur. sent6: the duster happens. sent7: the feature does not occur. sent8: that the hackwork does not occur is correct. sent9: the unargumentativeness happens but the retrenchment does not occur. sent10: the unbarring oilcloth does not occur. sent11: that not the sizing but the inconvenientness occurs does not hold. sent12: the ebbtide does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the adoption and the non-abdominalness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the abdominal does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the recce happens is not false.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the abdominalness does not occur but the recce occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the recce does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__