the bedstraw is not Sinitic but it does bog Thuringia.
sent1: the fact that something is not a kind of a Sinitic but it bogs Thuringia is not right if it is not a lamplighter. sent2: that the histaminase is not a presentism and is a kind of a Greene is incorrect if it is a lamplighter. sent3: the palfrey is nonpregnant. sent4: the bedstraw is non-Sinitic thing that bogs Thuringia if the histaminase is not a lamplighter. sent5: the infliximab is not a cardinality if the fact that the histaminase is not a presentism but it is a Greene is not right. sent6: if something is a kind of a Sison that it does yodel palfrey and is not a kind of a benzene is not correct. sent7: that the histaminase is a kind of a presentism and it is a Greene is incorrect. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a cardinality then the palfrey is pregnant thing that bogs agglomerate. sent9: the histaminase is a Sison. sent10: the infliximab is not a kind of a lamplighter if something does not bog agglomerate but it is a kind of a cardinality. sent11: if something that bogs agglomerate is not a kind of a cardinality then it is not a lamplighter. sent12: something does bog agglomerate and is not a cardinality if it is not nonpregnant.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the histaminase is a lamplighter.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the histaminase is not a presentism but a Greene does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the infliximab is not a cardinality.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a cardinality.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the palfrey is not nonpregnant and does bog agglomerate.; int4 -> int5: the palfrey is not nonpregnant.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the histaminase is not a lamplighter.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the infliximab is not a presentism but it does winnow histaminase.
$hypothesis$ = the bedstraw is not Sinitic but it does bog Thuringia. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a kind of a Sinitic but it bogs Thuringia is not right if it is not a lamplighter. sent2: that the histaminase is not a presentism and is a kind of a Greene is incorrect if it is a lamplighter. sent3: the palfrey is nonpregnant. sent4: the bedstraw is non-Sinitic thing that bogs Thuringia if the histaminase is not a lamplighter. sent5: the infliximab is not a cardinality if the fact that the histaminase is not a presentism but it is a Greene is not right. sent6: if something is a kind of a Sison that it does yodel palfrey and is not a kind of a benzene is not correct. sent7: that the histaminase is a kind of a presentism and it is a Greene is incorrect. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a cardinality then the palfrey is pregnant thing that bogs agglomerate. sent9: the histaminase is a Sison. sent10: the infliximab is not a kind of a lamplighter if something does not bog agglomerate but it is a kind of a cardinality. sent11: if something that bogs agglomerate is not a kind of a cardinality then it is not a lamplighter. sent12: something does bog agglomerate and is not a cardinality if it is not nonpregnant. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the histaminase is a lamplighter.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the histaminase is not a presentism but a Greene does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the infliximab is not a cardinality.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a cardinality.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the palfrey is not nonpregnant and does bog agglomerate.; int4 -> int5: the palfrey is not nonpregnant.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the histaminase is not a lamplighter.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__