that the sorbet is not a impulsiveness and launches suricate is incorrect.
sent1: the placenta does thread. sent2: the ogler is hairless if there exists something such that it is a kind of a thread and it is sabbatical. sent3: the fact that the duff is a thread is not incorrect. sent4: if the placenta is not hairless then that the ogler is not a kind of a sabbatical and does not thread is incorrect. sent5: the sorbet is a kind of a Moroccan. sent6: there exists something such that it is a phrasing. sent7: the duff is microelectronics. sent8: there exists something such that it is microelectronics. sent9: if the placenta is microelectronics then it is not hairless. sent10: if that the sorbet is not a sabbatical is not incorrect that the duff is not a kind of a thread and does launch suricate is not true. sent11: the fact that something is not a impulsiveness and launches suricate is not incorrect if it does thread. sent12: that the sorbet is not a impulsiveness and does launch suricate is false if the placenta is not microelectronics. sent13: that the sorbet does not thread and does launch suricate is not right if the ogler is not hairless. sent14: that the sorbet is a impulsiveness that does launch suricate is not right. sent15: that the placenta is not microelectronics hold if there exists something such that it is hairless.
the sorbet is not a kind of a impulsiveness but it launches suricate.
sent11 -> int1: the sorbet is not a impulsiveness but it launches suricate if it is a kind of a thread.;
$hypothesis$ = that the sorbet is not a impulsiveness and launches suricate is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the placenta does thread. sent2: the ogler is hairless if there exists something such that it is a kind of a thread and it is sabbatical. sent3: the fact that the duff is a thread is not incorrect. sent4: if the placenta is not hairless then that the ogler is not a kind of a sabbatical and does not thread is incorrect. sent5: the sorbet is a kind of a Moroccan. sent6: there exists something such that it is a phrasing. sent7: the duff is microelectronics. sent8: there exists something such that it is microelectronics. sent9: if the placenta is microelectronics then it is not hairless. sent10: if that the sorbet is not a sabbatical is not incorrect that the duff is not a kind of a thread and does launch suricate is not true. sent11: the fact that something is not a impulsiveness and launches suricate is not incorrect if it does thread. sent12: that the sorbet is not a impulsiveness and does launch suricate is false if the placenta is not microelectronics. sent13: that the sorbet does not thread and does launch suricate is not right if the ogler is not hairless. sent14: that the sorbet is a impulsiveness that does launch suricate is not right. sent15: that the placenta is not microelectronics hold if there exists something such that it is hairless. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__