that there exists something such that if it is both instrumental and not a adventuress then that it is perinasal is wrong is false.
sent1: the smilo is perinasal if it is instrumental and it is not a adventuress. sent2: if something is instrumental but it is not a adventuress then it is not perinasal. sent3: something is not perinasal if it is instrumental and it is a adventuress. sent4: something that is both a whitewash and not a LPN does not grasp avower. sent5: if an instrumental thing is not a kind of a adventuress it is perinasal.
sent2 -> int1: if the smilo is a kind of instrumental thing that is not a adventuress then it is not perinasal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is a whitewash and it is not a LPN is correct it does not grasp avower.
sent4 -> int2: if the sulfadiazine does whitewash but it is not a LPN then it does not grasp avower.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is both instrumental and not a adventuress then that it is perinasal is wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the smilo is perinasal if it is instrumental and it is not a adventuress. sent2: if something is instrumental but it is not a adventuress then it is not perinasal. sent3: something is not perinasal if it is instrumental and it is a adventuress. sent4: something that is both a whitewash and not a LPN does not grasp avower. sent5: if an instrumental thing is not a kind of a adventuress it is perinasal. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the smilo is a kind of instrumental thing that is not a adventuress then it is not perinasal.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__