that the citronwood revitalizes but it is not acidic does not hold.
sent1: if the fail-safe is not a Asteridae then the revenant is not consubstantial. sent2: if the fact that the brother-in-law is a kind of a PLF and/or it does not level SACLANT is wrong it is not caudal. sent3: the revenant is not a kind of a yoga. sent4: something revitalizes and is not acidic if it is not a kind of a Asteridae. sent5: the revenant is a fishpaste if the fact that that the citronwood is not consubstantial but it is acidic does not hold hold. sent6: that the citronwood revitalizes and is not a PLF is incorrect if the fail-safe does not fidget Brisbane. sent7: the belch is not a kind of a Asteridae. sent8: if that the serpent is not a PLF and is caudal is false the fact that the fail-safe fidgets Brisbane is correct. sent9: if the serpent is consubstantial then the revenant is Aboriginal. sent10: the fail-safe is Aboriginal if it does fidget Brisbane. sent11: the citronwood is not a Asteridae if the fail-safe is not a fishpaste but a Asteridae. sent12: that the citronwood revitalizes and it is acidic does not hold. sent13: the fail-safe does fidget Brisbane if the serpent is not caudal. sent14: if the brother-in-law is a MArch that it is a PLF and/or does not level SACLANT is not true. sent15: the fail-safe is not a fishpaste but it is a Asteridae if the revenant is Aboriginal. sent16: the revenant is a PLF if it is consubstantial. sent17: if the fail-safe is a Asteridae and not a fishpaste then it is not Aboriginal. sent18: the citronwood does not trickle. sent19: that the citronwood revitalizes and is acidic does not hold if the revenant does not trickle. sent20: the serpent does not revitalize if the fact that the citronwood is not caudal is correct. sent21: everything is a kind of a MArch. sent22: that the serpent is not a PLF but it is caudal is not correct. sent23: if the revenant is not consubstantial that it does not trickle is not false. sent24: the serpent is a Asteridae. sent25: the fail-safe is not a kind of a fishpaste. sent26: something is consubstantial and it does trickle if it does not fidget Brisbane.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fail-safe is a Asteridae.; assump1 & sent25 -> int1: the fail-safe is a Asteridae but it is not a fishpaste.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fail-safe is not Aboriginal.; sent8 & sent22 -> int3: the fail-safe fidgets Brisbane.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the fail-safe is Aboriginal.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fail-safe is not a Asteridae.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the revenant is not consubstantial.; int7 & sent23 -> int8: that the revenant does not trickle hold.;
the citronwood revitalizes and is not acidic.
sent4 -> int9: the citronwood does revitalize and is not acidic if the fact that it is not a Asteridae hold.; sent26 -> int10: the fact that the serpent is consubstantial and it does trickle is right if it does not fidget Brisbane.; sent21 -> int11: the brother-in-law is a MArch.; sent14 & int11 -> int12: that the brother-in-law either is a PLF or does not level SACLANT or both is wrong.; sent2 & int12 -> int13: the brother-in-law is not caudal.; int13 -> int14: something is not caudal.;
$hypothesis$ = that the citronwood revitalizes but it is not acidic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fail-safe is not a Asteridae then the revenant is not consubstantial. sent2: if the fact that the brother-in-law is a kind of a PLF and/or it does not level SACLANT is wrong it is not caudal. sent3: the revenant is not a kind of a yoga. sent4: something revitalizes and is not acidic if it is not a kind of a Asteridae. sent5: the revenant is a fishpaste if the fact that that the citronwood is not consubstantial but it is acidic does not hold hold. sent6: that the citronwood revitalizes and is not a PLF is incorrect if the fail-safe does not fidget Brisbane. sent7: the belch is not a kind of a Asteridae. sent8: if that the serpent is not a PLF and is caudal is false the fact that the fail-safe fidgets Brisbane is correct. sent9: if the serpent is consubstantial then the revenant is Aboriginal. sent10: the fail-safe is Aboriginal if it does fidget Brisbane. sent11: the citronwood is not a Asteridae if the fail-safe is not a fishpaste but a Asteridae. sent12: that the citronwood revitalizes and it is acidic does not hold. sent13: the fail-safe does fidget Brisbane if the serpent is not caudal. sent14: if the brother-in-law is a MArch that it is a PLF and/or does not level SACLANT is not true. sent15: the fail-safe is not a fishpaste but it is a Asteridae if the revenant is Aboriginal. sent16: the revenant is a PLF if it is consubstantial. sent17: if the fail-safe is a Asteridae and not a fishpaste then it is not Aboriginal. sent18: the citronwood does not trickle. sent19: that the citronwood revitalizes and is acidic does not hold if the revenant does not trickle. sent20: the serpent does not revitalize if the fact that the citronwood is not caudal is correct. sent21: everything is a kind of a MArch. sent22: that the serpent is not a PLF but it is caudal is not correct. sent23: if the revenant is not consubstantial that it does not trickle is not false. sent24: the serpent is a Asteridae. sent25: the fail-safe is not a kind of a fishpaste. sent26: something is consubstantial and it does trickle if it does not fidget Brisbane. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fail-safe is a Asteridae.; assump1 & sent25 -> int1: the fail-safe is a Asteridae but it is not a fishpaste.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fail-safe is not Aboriginal.; sent8 & sent22 -> int3: the fail-safe fidgets Brisbane.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the fail-safe is Aboriginal.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fail-safe is not a Asteridae.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the revenant is not consubstantial.; int7 & sent23 -> int8: that the revenant does not trickle hold.; __UNKNOWN__