that there exists something such that if it is a wiggler and is not an internist it is not a Oppenheimer is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is unenforceable and not Romance it is unpropitious. sent2: if the elbow is a kind of a wiggler that is not an internist then it is not a Oppenheimer. sent3: if something is proteolytic thing that is not a monk then it does not freckle Soufflot. sent4: the cytoskeleton is a gridiron if it is a Oppenheimer and it is not aerological.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is both proteolytic and not a monk then it does not freckle Soufflot.
sent3 -> int1: if the skeptic is both not non-proteolytic and not a monk then it does not freckle Soufflot.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a wiggler and is not an internist it is not a Oppenheimer is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is unenforceable and not Romance it is unpropitious. sent2: if the elbow is a kind of a wiggler that is not an internist then it is not a Oppenheimer. sent3: if something is proteolytic thing that is not a monk then it does not freckle Soufflot. sent4: the cytoskeleton is a gridiron if it is a Oppenheimer and it is not aerological. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__