the fact that if the reductionistness happens the tiding does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the reductionistness occurs if the preservation occurs or the tide occurs or both. sent2: if the preservation happens and/or the tiding happens then the reductionistness does not occur. sent3: the alertness does not occur. sent4: the abusing goldfish does not occur if that the tiding does not occur and the abusing goldfish occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tiding occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the preservation happens or the tiding happens or both.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the reductionistness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the reductionistness happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tide does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the abusing goldfish does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the reductionistness happens the tiding does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the reductionistness occurs if the preservation occurs or the tide occurs or both. sent2: if the preservation happens and/or the tiding happens then the reductionistness does not occur. sent3: the alertness does not occur. sent4: the abusing goldfish does not occur if that the tiding does not occur and the abusing goldfish occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tiding occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the preservation happens or the tiding happens or both.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the reductionistness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the reductionistness happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tide does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__