that the non-pneumococcalness brings about that the picturing does not occur is not correct.
sent1: the picturing causes that the pneumococcalness occurs. sent2: if the pneumococcalness but not the picturing happens then the hurting occurs. sent3: if that the pulverization does not occur and the festooning roof does not occur is wrong then the pulverization occurs. sent4: if the pulverization occurs the pneumococcalness but not the picturing happens. sent5: the picturing occurs if the pneumococcalness does not occur. sent6: the non-niceness prevents the Salvadoranness.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the picturing happens.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the pneumococcalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pneumococcalness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the picturing does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the hurting occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the non-pneumococcalness brings about that the picturing does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the picturing causes that the pneumococcalness occurs. sent2: if the pneumococcalness but not the picturing happens then the hurting occurs. sent3: if that the pulverization does not occur and the festooning roof does not occur is wrong then the pulverization occurs. sent4: if the pulverization occurs the pneumococcalness but not the picturing happens. sent5: the picturing occurs if the pneumococcalness does not occur. sent6: the non-niceness prevents the Salvadoranness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the picturing happens.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the pneumococcalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pneumococcalness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the picturing does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__