the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is a hole and is not dystopian does not hold then it is a excitability is not correct.
sent1: the copyholder is a excitability if it is a discrepancy and it is not a kind of a zydeco. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a sleep but it does not wear is not true it is polytheistic. sent3: there is something such that if it is phylogenetic and it is not a diastrophism then it is appendicular. sent4: the armyworm is an empiricist if it does enter. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a ASALA is not false then it coos Passover. sent6: if the fact that the armyworm holes and is not dystopian is not true then it is a kind of a excitability. sent7: the armyworm is a kind of a excitability if it holes and it is not dystopian. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a tramontane and it is lidless is wrong it does immortalize PAC. sent9: if the hubcap is a kind of a Klaproth it is a sprinkler.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a sleep and it is not a wear does not hold then it is polytheistic.
sent2 -> int1: the cocoon is polytheistic if that it is a sleep and it is not a wear is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is a hole and is not dystopian does not hold then it is a excitability is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the copyholder is a excitability if it is a discrepancy and it is not a kind of a zydeco. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a sleep but it does not wear is not true it is polytheistic. sent3: there is something such that if it is phylogenetic and it is not a diastrophism then it is appendicular. sent4: the armyworm is an empiricist if it does enter. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a ASALA is not false then it coos Passover. sent6: if the fact that the armyworm holes and is not dystopian is not true then it is a kind of a excitability. sent7: the armyworm is a kind of a excitability if it holes and it is not dystopian. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a tramontane and it is lidless is wrong it does immortalize PAC. sent9: if the hubcap is a kind of a Klaproth it is a sprinkler. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__