the readout unplugs and/or is not accipitrine.
sent1: something is spicate if that it is a kernite is not wrong. sent2: that the check does not volunteer is not wrong if the fact that it does clap bulldog or does not indurate Monario or both is not correct. sent3: if something does not volunteer it is a kind of a kernite and it is spicate. sent4: the check is a volunteer. sent5: the fact that the check unplugs and/or is not a kind of a Nimrod is not true. sent6: if the check is a kind of a volunteer the readout is a kernite. sent7: the readout does not volunteer if the fact that it is accipitrine and/or it does not unplug is wrong. sent8: the fact that the readout is a roots or it is not crinoid or both is incorrect. sent9: if the readout is a sailing the fact that it claps kina is right. sent10: if the fact that the fact that something unplugs and/or it is not accipitrine is not wrong is wrong then it is not spicate.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the readout is not spicate is correct if that it unplugs or is not accipitrine or both is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that either the readout unplugs or it is not accipitrine or both is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the readout is not spicate.; sent1 -> int3: the readout is spicate if it is a kernite.; sent6 & sent4 -> int4: the readout is a kernite.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the readout is spicate.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the readout unplugs or it is not accipitrine or both is false.
sent3 -> int7: the check is both a kernite and spicate if it is not a volunteer.;
$hypothesis$ = the readout unplugs and/or is not accipitrine. ; $context$ = sent1: something is spicate if that it is a kernite is not wrong. sent2: that the check does not volunteer is not wrong if the fact that it does clap bulldog or does not indurate Monario or both is not correct. sent3: if something does not volunteer it is a kind of a kernite and it is spicate. sent4: the check is a volunteer. sent5: the fact that the check unplugs and/or is not a kind of a Nimrod is not true. sent6: if the check is a kind of a volunteer the readout is a kernite. sent7: the readout does not volunteer if the fact that it is accipitrine and/or it does not unplug is wrong. sent8: the fact that the readout is a roots or it is not crinoid or both is incorrect. sent9: if the readout is a sailing the fact that it claps kina is right. sent10: if the fact that the fact that something unplugs and/or it is not accipitrine is not wrong is wrong then it is not spicate. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the readout is not spicate is correct if that it unplugs or is not accipitrine or both is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that either the readout unplugs or it is not accipitrine or both is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the readout is not spicate.; sent1 -> int3: the readout is spicate if it is a kernite.; sent6 & sent4 -> int4: the readout is a kernite.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the readout is spicate.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__