the portable protests Denver.
sent1: the den is a kind of an eater if something that trundles croton is not a kind of a hereditarianism. sent2: the portable does not recumb and is Pythagorean if it is not a kind of a cheat. sent3: if something is a say then that it is a redberry is not wrong. sent4: the sparer is Pythagorean if the croton is not Pythagorean. sent5: The destalinization protests sparer. sent6: if the fact that something is not Pythagorean and/or it is a Sofia does not hold it is a cheat. sent7: the sparer is Pythagorean. sent8: the fact that the sparer is a kind of a Castile is true if it does protest destalinization. sent9: the croton is not Pythagorean if the den does recumb. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is prescription is right. sent11: there exists something such that it does not trundle croton and is not a hereditarianism. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a cheat. sent13: the croton trundles croton. sent14: the sparer is a cheat if the fact that it is Pythagorean and/or it is a Sofia is not true. sent15: if the sparer is a kind of a Castile it is a prescription. sent16: the portable is not a cheat if that the den is not a cheat or it is a prescription or both is not true. sent17: that the sparer recumbs is correct if it does protest destalinization. sent18: the sparer protests destalinization. sent19: if that something is either Pythagorean or a Sofia or both is wrong then it is a cheat. sent20: something does recumb if that it is an eater hold. sent21: if something does not trundle croton and is not a hereditarianism the den is an eater. sent22: the fact that either the sparer is non-Pythagorean or it is a Sofia or both is not true if the croton is not non-Pythagorean. sent23: if something does not trundle croton and is a hereditarianism then the den is an eater. sent24: the portable is an eater if it is sanitary. sent25: if a cheat is prescription the portable does not protest Denver.
sent11 & sent21 -> int1: the den is an eater.; sent20 -> int2: if the den is an eater it does recumb.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the den does recumb.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the croton is not Pythagorean is true.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the sparer is not Pythagorean and/or it is a Sofia hold does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that if that the sparer is not Pythagorean and/or it is a kind of the Sofia is incorrect the sparer is a cheat is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sparer is a cheat.; sent8 & sent18 -> int8: the sparer is a Castile.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the sparer is a prescription hold.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the sparer cheats and it is a kind of a prescription.; int10 -> int11: something does cheat and is a prescription.; int11 & sent25 -> hypothesis;
the portable protests Denver.
$hypothesis$ = the portable protests Denver. ; $context$ = sent1: the den is a kind of an eater if something that trundles croton is not a kind of a hereditarianism. sent2: the portable does not recumb and is Pythagorean if it is not a kind of a cheat. sent3: if something is a say then that it is a redberry is not wrong. sent4: the sparer is Pythagorean if the croton is not Pythagorean. sent5: The destalinization protests sparer. sent6: if the fact that something is not Pythagorean and/or it is a Sofia does not hold it is a cheat. sent7: the sparer is Pythagorean. sent8: the fact that the sparer is a kind of a Castile is true if it does protest destalinization. sent9: the croton is not Pythagorean if the den does recumb. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is prescription is right. sent11: there exists something such that it does not trundle croton and is not a hereditarianism. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a cheat. sent13: the croton trundles croton. sent14: the sparer is a cheat if the fact that it is Pythagorean and/or it is a Sofia is not true. sent15: if the sparer is a kind of a Castile it is a prescription. sent16: the portable is not a cheat if that the den is not a cheat or it is a prescription or both is not true. sent17: that the sparer recumbs is correct if it does protest destalinization. sent18: the sparer protests destalinization. sent19: if that something is either Pythagorean or a Sofia or both is wrong then it is a cheat. sent20: something does recumb if that it is an eater hold. sent21: if something does not trundle croton and is not a hereditarianism the den is an eater. sent22: the fact that either the sparer is non-Pythagorean or it is a Sofia or both is not true if the croton is not non-Pythagorean. sent23: if something does not trundle croton and is a hereditarianism then the den is an eater. sent24: the portable is an eater if it is sanitary. sent25: if a cheat is prescription the portable does not protest Denver. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent21 -> int1: the den is an eater.; sent20 -> int2: if the den is an eater it does recumb.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the den does recumb.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the croton is not Pythagorean is true.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the sparer is not Pythagorean and/or it is a Sofia hold does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that if that the sparer is not Pythagorean and/or it is a kind of the Sofia is incorrect the sparer is a cheat is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sparer is a cheat.; sent8 & sent18 -> int8: the sparer is a Castile.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the sparer is a prescription hold.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the sparer cheats and it is a kind of a prescription.; int10 -> int11: something does cheat and is a prescription.; int11 & sent25 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__