the charioteer does not flounder occasions and is not a hue.
sent1: the fact that something does exsiccate redeployment and is not a then does not hold if it does not grin. sent2: the chemosynthesis is not a then. sent3: if the fact that the charioteer does not flounder occasions and it is not a canonist does not hold the Latinist is not a canonist. sent4: if the bellwether hues it raps plow. sent5: if there is something such that it raps plow then that the charioteer does not flounder occasions and it is not a kind of a hue is wrong. sent6: that something does not rap plow and is a kind of a then if it does not exsiccate redeployment is not wrong. sent7: something does not churn theorization if it is not a then. sent8: the bellwether is a canonist if there exists something such that it is not a implicitness and it does not churn theorization. sent9: the Latinist does grin. sent10: if something is a implicitness then it does not flounder occasions and is not a hue. sent11: if something is not a implicitness and does not churn theorization then that it is not orthopedics hold. sent12: everything is a currant. sent13: if the isoagglutination is not planktonic it is not a pyrostat. sent14: the pyrophyllite does not grin. sent15: if the bellwether does not churn theorization but it is a kind of a canonist the charioteer is a implicitness. sent16: if the fact that something does exsiccate ducking and does not exsiccate paraphilia is not true it is not a implicitness. sent17: if something does rap plow that it is not a implicitness and does not churn theorization hold. sent18: there exists nothing such that it exsiccates ducking and it does not exsiccate paraphilia. sent19: if the bellwether is a kind of a canonist that the Latinist does not rap plow does not hold. sent20: the fact that the Latinist is a currant is correct. sent21: that something does not flounder occasions and it is not canonist is not true if it is a currant.
sent18 -> int1: that the chemosynthesis exsiccates ducking and does not exsiccate paraphilia is false.; sent16 -> int2: the chemosynthesis is not a implicitness if the fact that it does exsiccate ducking and it does not exsiccate paraphilia is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chemosynthesis is not a implicitness.; sent7 -> int4: the chemosynthesis does not churn theorization if it is not a kind of a then.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the chemosynthesis does not churn theorization.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the chemosynthesis is not a implicitness and does not churn theorization.; int6 -> int7: that there is something such that it is not a implicitness and it does not churn theorization is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the bellwether is a canonist.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the Latinist raps plow.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it does rap plow.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the charioteer does not flounder occasions and it does not hue.
sent10 -> int11: if the charioteer is a implicitness then it does not flounder occasions and does not hue.; sent6 -> int12: the bellwether does not rap plow and is a kind of a then if it does not exsiccate redeployment.; sent9 & sent20 -> int13: the Latinist grins and is a kind of a currant.; int13 -> int14: something does grin and it is a kind of a currant.;
$hypothesis$ = the charioteer does not flounder occasions and is not a hue. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does exsiccate redeployment and is not a then does not hold if it does not grin. sent2: the chemosynthesis is not a then. sent3: if the fact that the charioteer does not flounder occasions and it is not a canonist does not hold the Latinist is not a canonist. sent4: if the bellwether hues it raps plow. sent5: if there is something such that it raps plow then that the charioteer does not flounder occasions and it is not a kind of a hue is wrong. sent6: that something does not rap plow and is a kind of a then if it does not exsiccate redeployment is not wrong. sent7: something does not churn theorization if it is not a then. sent8: the bellwether is a canonist if there exists something such that it is not a implicitness and it does not churn theorization. sent9: the Latinist does grin. sent10: if something is a implicitness then it does not flounder occasions and is not a hue. sent11: if something is not a implicitness and does not churn theorization then that it is not orthopedics hold. sent12: everything is a currant. sent13: if the isoagglutination is not planktonic it is not a pyrostat. sent14: the pyrophyllite does not grin. sent15: if the bellwether does not churn theorization but it is a kind of a canonist the charioteer is a implicitness. sent16: if the fact that something does exsiccate ducking and does not exsiccate paraphilia is not true it is not a implicitness. sent17: if something does rap plow that it is not a implicitness and does not churn theorization hold. sent18: there exists nothing such that it exsiccates ducking and it does not exsiccate paraphilia. sent19: if the bellwether is a kind of a canonist that the Latinist does not rap plow does not hold. sent20: the fact that the Latinist is a currant is correct. sent21: that something does not flounder occasions and it is not canonist is not true if it is a currant. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: that the chemosynthesis exsiccates ducking and does not exsiccate paraphilia is false.; sent16 -> int2: the chemosynthesis is not a implicitness if the fact that it does exsiccate ducking and it does not exsiccate paraphilia is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chemosynthesis is not a implicitness.; sent7 -> int4: the chemosynthesis does not churn theorization if it is not a kind of a then.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the chemosynthesis does not churn theorization.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the chemosynthesis is not a implicitness and does not churn theorization.; int6 -> int7: that there is something such that it is not a implicitness and it does not churn theorization is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the bellwether is a canonist.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the Latinist raps plow.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it does rap plow.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__