the steeling serration occurs.
sent1: that the panting does not occur is true if both the counselorship and the joust occurs. sent2: that the tamping tissue occurs and the steeling cupbearer occurs is not right. sent3: the fact that not the fearing iodide but the steeling cultivator occurs is false if the conventionalizing syphilitic occurs. sent4: the steeling EXEC happens. sent5: the steeling Fechner does not occur. sent6: the fact that both the tamping tissue and the steeling cupbearer occurs is false if the indemnification occurs. sent7: the indemnification happens. sent8: that not the tamping tissue but the steeling cupbearer happens is false if the indemnification occurs. sent9: the conventionalizing gyneolatry does not occur. sent10: the Hugoesqueness occurs if the tamping tissue happens. sent11: the fact that the clarification does not occur hold if the Hugoesqueness occurs and the steeling serration happens. sent12: if the cuticularness does not occur then the conventionalizing syphilitic happens and the fearing sawwort occurs. sent13: if the fact that the fearing iodide does not occur but the steeling cultivator happens is not true the fearing Carroll occurs. sent14: the steeling serration but not the clarification happens if the tonic happens. sent15: the feminineness does not occur. sent16: the Hugoesqueness occurs if that the tamping tissue does not occur but the steeling cupbearer happens is not true. sent17: the fact that the tonicness occurs and/or the clarification does not occur does not hold. sent18: that the tonic happens does not hold. sent19: the steeling Bulawayo does not occur. sent20: if that the fearing Carroll occurs is true then the tonicness happens.
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the tamping tissue does not occur but the steeling cupbearer occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the Hugoesqueness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steeling serration occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Hugoesqueness occurs and the steeling serration happens.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: that the clarification does not occur hold.; int4 -> int5: the tonic occurs and/or the clarification does not occur.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the tamping challenge does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the steeling serration occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the panting does not occur is true if both the counselorship and the joust occurs. sent2: that the tamping tissue occurs and the steeling cupbearer occurs is not right. sent3: the fact that not the fearing iodide but the steeling cultivator occurs is false if the conventionalizing syphilitic occurs. sent4: the steeling EXEC happens. sent5: the steeling Fechner does not occur. sent6: the fact that both the tamping tissue and the steeling cupbearer occurs is false if the indemnification occurs. sent7: the indemnification happens. sent8: that not the tamping tissue but the steeling cupbearer happens is false if the indemnification occurs. sent9: the conventionalizing gyneolatry does not occur. sent10: the Hugoesqueness occurs if the tamping tissue happens. sent11: the fact that the clarification does not occur hold if the Hugoesqueness occurs and the steeling serration happens. sent12: if the cuticularness does not occur then the conventionalizing syphilitic happens and the fearing sawwort occurs. sent13: if the fact that the fearing iodide does not occur but the steeling cultivator happens is not true the fearing Carroll occurs. sent14: the steeling serration but not the clarification happens if the tonic happens. sent15: the feminineness does not occur. sent16: the Hugoesqueness occurs if that the tamping tissue does not occur but the steeling cupbearer happens is not true. sent17: the fact that the tonicness occurs and/or the clarification does not occur does not hold. sent18: that the tonic happens does not hold. sent19: the steeling Bulawayo does not occur. sent20: if that the fearing Carroll occurs is true then the tonicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the tamping tissue does not occur but the steeling cupbearer occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the Hugoesqueness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steeling serration occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Hugoesqueness occurs and the steeling serration happens.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: that the clarification does not occur hold.; int4 -> int5: the tonic occurs and/or the clarification does not occur.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__