that the toadfish is irreducible is right.
sent1: if the self-heal is a kind of bistroic thing that is not a kind of a Rhenish then the toadfish is not bistroic. sent2: if something is both not a demonstrative and bistroic then it is not a Rhenish. sent3: if the fact that the pinko gravitates is true the MA is Muhammadan. sent4: if the electrologist does not talk lumpfish and is Rhenish then the fact that it is not a regosol is right. sent5: if something that is a kind of a polyphony is Muhammadan then the trot is not a HF. sent6: the MA is not a dent but it is bistroic. sent7: the toadfish does not dissipate. sent8: if the toadfish is irreducible and it is a Rhenish then it is not bistroic. sent9: if the MA is both irreducible and demonstrative then it is not bistroic. sent10: the trot is a dent if there exists something such that that it is a salamander is not false. sent11: the MA is not a demonstrative but it is bistroic if the self-heal is bistroic. sent12: the MA is bistroic if the self-heal is bistroic. sent13: the MA is not irreducible if the fact that it is a kind of a demonstrative and it is not non-bistroic is true. sent14: something is not a kind of a dent if that it is a salamander that is a kind of a demonstrative is incorrect. sent15: the pinko does gravitate. sent16: if something is bistroic it is filial. sent17: the MA is bistroic. sent18: the trot is not a dent if the self-heal is not bistroic. sent19: that the MA is a polyphony is not wrong. sent20: the toadfish is a demonstrative. sent21: there exists something such that it is a kind of a salamander. sent22: if something is not bistroic it is irreducible. sent23: there exists something such that it is a Rhenish. sent24: the toadfish does not stratify and is demonstrative. sent25: if something is non-Rhenish the toadfish is not irreducible.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the self-heal is not bistroic.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the trot is not a dent.; sent21 & sent10 -> int2: the trot is a dent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the self-heal is bistroic.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the MA is not a demonstrative and is bistroic.; sent2 -> int6: the MA is not a Rhenish if it is not a demonstrative and not non-bistroic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the MA is not a Rhenish.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not Rhenish.; int8 & sent25 -> hypothesis;
the toadfish is irreducible.
sent22 -> int9: if that the toadfish is not bistroic is true it is irreducible.; sent14 -> int10: if the fact that the self-heal is a salamander and is a demonstrative is not right then it is not a dent.; sent3 & sent15 -> int11: the MA is Muhammadan.; sent19 & int11 -> int12: the MA is a polyphony and it is Muhammadan.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is a polyphony and is Muhammadan.; int13 & sent5 -> int14: the trot is not a kind of a HF.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it is not a HF.;
$hypothesis$ = that the toadfish is irreducible is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the self-heal is a kind of bistroic thing that is not a kind of a Rhenish then the toadfish is not bistroic. sent2: if something is both not a demonstrative and bistroic then it is not a Rhenish. sent3: if the fact that the pinko gravitates is true the MA is Muhammadan. sent4: if the electrologist does not talk lumpfish and is Rhenish then the fact that it is not a regosol is right. sent5: if something that is a kind of a polyphony is Muhammadan then the trot is not a HF. sent6: the MA is not a dent but it is bistroic. sent7: the toadfish does not dissipate. sent8: if the toadfish is irreducible and it is a Rhenish then it is not bistroic. sent9: if the MA is both irreducible and demonstrative then it is not bistroic. sent10: the trot is a dent if there exists something such that that it is a salamander is not false. sent11: the MA is not a demonstrative but it is bistroic if the self-heal is bistroic. sent12: the MA is bistroic if the self-heal is bistroic. sent13: the MA is not irreducible if the fact that it is a kind of a demonstrative and it is not non-bistroic is true. sent14: something is not a kind of a dent if that it is a salamander that is a kind of a demonstrative is incorrect. sent15: the pinko does gravitate. sent16: if something is bistroic it is filial. sent17: the MA is bistroic. sent18: the trot is not a dent if the self-heal is not bistroic. sent19: that the MA is a polyphony is not wrong. sent20: the toadfish is a demonstrative. sent21: there exists something such that it is a kind of a salamander. sent22: if something is not bistroic it is irreducible. sent23: there exists something such that it is a Rhenish. sent24: the toadfish does not stratify and is demonstrative. sent25: if something is non-Rhenish the toadfish is not irreducible. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the self-heal is not bistroic.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the trot is not a dent.; sent21 & sent10 -> int2: the trot is a dent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the self-heal is bistroic.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the MA is not a demonstrative and is bistroic.; sent2 -> int6: the MA is not a Rhenish if it is not a demonstrative and not non-bistroic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the MA is not a Rhenish.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not Rhenish.; int8 & sent25 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__