the fact that there exists something such that if it is not anagrammatic then that it is not papery and it is not an eleven is not correct is false.
sent1: that the enemy is not papery but it is a phyle is not correct if it does not unclothe embarrassment. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of an explosive then the fact that it does not emit and it is not a kind of an administrator is incorrect. sent3: the fact that there is something such that if it is not lucifugous then that it is not a fib and is not nonexempt does not hold hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not horn enemy then the fact that it does not embrown phytochemical and is not a kind of a Houghton does not hold. sent5: the fact that the enemy is anagrammatic thing that is not paranasal is incorrect if it does not unclothe pollinium. sent6: there exists something such that if it is systolic then the fact that that it does not unclothe Mwanza and it is not paranasal is correct is not true. sent7: if the phytochemical is an immunology then the fact that it is not a Azaleastrum and not an escalator is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a marquee that it is both unscientific and not a tilt does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not unclothe funrun the fact that it does not unclothe Mwanza and it is not a thyme is incorrect. sent10: that the enemy is not papery and it is not an eleven is wrong if it is not anagrammatic.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not anagrammatic then that it is not papery and it is not an eleven is not correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the enemy is not papery but it is a phyle is not correct if it does not unclothe embarrassment. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of an explosive then the fact that it does not emit and it is not a kind of an administrator is incorrect. sent3: the fact that there is something such that if it is not lucifugous then that it is not a fib and is not nonexempt does not hold hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not horn enemy then the fact that it does not embrown phytochemical and is not a kind of a Houghton does not hold. sent5: the fact that the enemy is anagrammatic thing that is not paranasal is incorrect if it does not unclothe pollinium. sent6: there exists something such that if it is systolic then the fact that that it does not unclothe Mwanza and it is not paranasal is correct is not true. sent7: if the phytochemical is an immunology then the fact that it is not a Azaleastrum and not an escalator is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a marquee that it is both unscientific and not a tilt does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not unclothe funrun the fact that it does not unclothe Mwanza and it is not a thyme is incorrect. sent10: that the enemy is not papery and it is not an eleven is wrong if it is not anagrammatic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__