that the practice does not occur and the speaking squeak does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the quoits does not occur. sent2: the exteroceptiveness does not occur if the tragicness occurs and the occasions happens. sent3: if the outbreak happens then that the sparging annoyance occurs is not incorrect. sent4: if the process does not occur then the fact that the non-premedicalness and the Pythagoreanness happens does not hold. sent5: the fact that the practicing occurs and the speaking squeak does not occur does not hold if the Pythagoreanness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the practicing occurs but the speaking squeak does not occur is not correct. sent7: the fact that that the scarceness happens but the frying does not occur is incorrect hold if the endergonicness does not occur. sent8: the exteroceptiveness occurs. sent9: not the exteroceptiveness but the occasioning occurs if the protrusion does not occur. sent10: the fact that that the practicing does not occur but the speaking squeak happens is not true is correct. sent11: that the non-exteroceptiveness and the occasioning occurs triggers that the speaking squeak does not occur. sent12: if the defending and the mayhem happens the taekwondo does not occur. sent13: if the Pythagoreanness does not occur the fact that that the practice does not occur and the speaking squeak does not occur is true is incorrect. sent14: the premedicalness happens. sent15: if the fact that the unrentableness does not occur is true that both the practice and the non-tragicness occurs is not true. sent16: the unrentableness happens. sent17: that the practice does not occur is brought about by the non-unrentableness. sent18: the tragicness occurs if the unrentableness occurs. sent19: the trisecting pepperwood occurs and the sparging ideality occurs.
sent18 & sent16 -> int1: the tragicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the occasioning occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tragicness occurs and the occasioning happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the exteroceptiveness does not occur is not incorrect.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the occasioning does not occur.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the premedicalness happens and the occasions does not occur.;
the practice does not occur and the speaking squeak does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the practice does not occur and the speaking squeak does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the quoits does not occur. sent2: the exteroceptiveness does not occur if the tragicness occurs and the occasions happens. sent3: if the outbreak happens then that the sparging annoyance occurs is not incorrect. sent4: if the process does not occur then the fact that the non-premedicalness and the Pythagoreanness happens does not hold. sent5: the fact that the practicing occurs and the speaking squeak does not occur does not hold if the Pythagoreanness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the practicing occurs but the speaking squeak does not occur is not correct. sent7: the fact that that the scarceness happens but the frying does not occur is incorrect hold if the endergonicness does not occur. sent8: the exteroceptiveness occurs. sent9: not the exteroceptiveness but the occasioning occurs if the protrusion does not occur. sent10: the fact that that the practicing does not occur but the speaking squeak happens is not true is correct. sent11: that the non-exteroceptiveness and the occasioning occurs triggers that the speaking squeak does not occur. sent12: if the defending and the mayhem happens the taekwondo does not occur. sent13: if the Pythagoreanness does not occur the fact that that the practice does not occur and the speaking squeak does not occur is true is incorrect. sent14: the premedicalness happens. sent15: if the fact that the unrentableness does not occur is true that both the practice and the non-tragicness occurs is not true. sent16: the unrentableness happens. sent17: that the practice does not occur is brought about by the non-unrentableness. sent18: the tragicness occurs if the unrentableness occurs. sent19: the trisecting pepperwood occurs and the sparging ideality occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent16 -> int1: the tragicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the occasioning occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tragicness occurs and the occasioning happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the exteroceptiveness does not occur is not incorrect.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the occasioning does not occur.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the premedicalness happens and the occasions does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__