the fact that the swimming narrative and the non-exodonticness occurs if the pant does not occur does not hold.
sent1: if the initiative does not occur the swimming narrative and the non-exodonticness happens. sent2: that both the initiative and the pant happens is not correct. sent3: the fact that both the quiescence and the pooling happens is wrong. sent4: if the panting does not occur the fact that the swimming narrative happens is not false. sent5: the successfulness happens but the bentoniticness does not occur. sent6: that the initiative does not occur leads to the swimming narrative. sent7: the suppling combine happens. sent8: the swimming narrative occurs. sent9: the abomination but not the pairing pickup happens. sent10: the fact that the rest does not occur hold. sent11: the fact that the initiative occurs but the pant does not occur is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the initiative occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the panting does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the initiative but not the panting happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the initiative does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the swimming narrative but not the exodonticness happens.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the swimming narrative and the non-exodonticness occurs if the pant does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the initiative does not occur the swimming narrative and the non-exodonticness happens. sent2: that both the initiative and the pant happens is not correct. sent3: the fact that both the quiescence and the pooling happens is wrong. sent4: if the panting does not occur the fact that the swimming narrative happens is not false. sent5: the successfulness happens but the bentoniticness does not occur. sent6: that the initiative does not occur leads to the swimming narrative. sent7: the suppling combine happens. sent8: the swimming narrative occurs. sent9: the abomination but not the pairing pickup happens. sent10: the fact that the rest does not occur hold. sent11: the fact that the initiative occurs but the pant does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the initiative occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the panting does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the initiative but not the panting happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the initiative does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the swimming narrative but not the exodonticness happens.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__