the bridge is Beethovenian.
sent1: something is both not avitaminotic and a trot if it does malinger elephant's-foot. sent2: if something does malinger elephant's-foot then it trots. sent3: the bridge is avitaminotic. sent4: if the economist is avitaminotic the fact that it manipulates is correct. sent5: if something is not a Elizabethan the economist does not bop values and does brown. sent6: something is not avitaminotic. sent7: there is something such that it is a kind of a Elizabethan that does trot. sent8: if something is a kind of non-avitaminotic a trot the bridge is Beethovenian. sent9: the elephant's-foot is Beethovenian. sent10: the economist is a kind of Elizabethan thing that does malinger elephant's-foot.
sent10 -> int1: the economist does malinger elephant's-foot.; sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the economist malingers elephant's-foot is not false then it is non-avitaminotic and a trot.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the economist is non-avitaminotic a trot.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-avitaminotic a trot.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
something does not bop values and does brown.
$hypothesis$ = the bridge is Beethovenian. ; $context$ = sent1: something is both not avitaminotic and a trot if it does malinger elephant's-foot. sent2: if something does malinger elephant's-foot then it trots. sent3: the bridge is avitaminotic. sent4: if the economist is avitaminotic the fact that it manipulates is correct. sent5: if something is not a Elizabethan the economist does not bop values and does brown. sent6: something is not avitaminotic. sent7: there is something such that it is a kind of a Elizabethan that does trot. sent8: if something is a kind of non-avitaminotic a trot the bridge is Beethovenian. sent9: the elephant's-foot is Beethovenian. sent10: the economist is a kind of Elizabethan thing that does malinger elephant's-foot. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the economist does malinger elephant's-foot.; sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the economist malingers elephant's-foot is not false then it is non-avitaminotic and a trot.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the economist is non-avitaminotic a trot.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-avitaminotic a trot.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__