that something brads alluvium and it demotes Landau is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that it does brad alluvium. sent2: if the alluvium is a kind of a grind then that the fence does not brad prince's-plume and is not current is not right. sent3: the alluvium is a grind. sent4: something demotes Landau. sent5: the fence does not brad prince's-plume. sent6: that the fence brads prince's-plume and it is noncurrent is not true. sent7: the fence does not brad prince's-plume if the prince's-plume is not non-morphophonemics. sent8: the conima is noncurrent. sent9: if the conima demotes Landau the fact that the alluvium is morphophonemics and is a grind is incorrect. sent10: the fact that something does not demote Landau and is a seedcake is false if it is not morphophonemics. sent11: if the fact that the alluvium grinds is right the fact that the fence does brad prince's-plume and it is noncurrent does not hold. sent12: if the fact that the sutler is not a grind and does brad alluvium is not true then it does not brad alluvium. sent13: that the conima is nonindulgent is correct if the prince's-plume is not morphophonemics. sent14: the conima does brad alluvium if it is nonindulgent. sent15: the fence does not brad prince's-plume and is noncurrent if the prince's-plume is morphophonemics. sent16: The Landau does demote conima. sent17: the conima does demote Landau.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prince's-plume is morphophonemics.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fence does not brad prince's-plume and is noncurrent.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the fence does not brad prince's-plume but it is noncurrent does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the prince's-plume is not morphophonemics.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the conima is nonindulgent.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the conima does brad alluvium.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the conima does brad alluvium and it demotes Landau.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the shocker does not demote Landau and is a seedcake is not correct.
sent10 -> int8: that the shocker does not demote Landau and is a seedcake is incorrect if it is non-morphophonemics.;
$hypothesis$ = that something brads alluvium and it demotes Landau is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does brad alluvium. sent2: if the alluvium is a kind of a grind then that the fence does not brad prince's-plume and is not current is not right. sent3: the alluvium is a grind. sent4: something demotes Landau. sent5: the fence does not brad prince's-plume. sent6: that the fence brads prince's-plume and it is noncurrent is not true. sent7: the fence does not brad prince's-plume if the prince's-plume is not non-morphophonemics. sent8: the conima is noncurrent. sent9: if the conima demotes Landau the fact that the alluvium is morphophonemics and is a grind is incorrect. sent10: the fact that something does not demote Landau and is a seedcake is false if it is not morphophonemics. sent11: if the fact that the alluvium grinds is right the fact that the fence does brad prince's-plume and it is noncurrent does not hold. sent12: if the fact that the sutler is not a grind and does brad alluvium is not true then it does not brad alluvium. sent13: that the conima is nonindulgent is correct if the prince's-plume is not morphophonemics. sent14: the conima does brad alluvium if it is nonindulgent. sent15: the fence does not brad prince's-plume and is noncurrent if the prince's-plume is morphophonemics. sent16: The Landau does demote conima. sent17: the conima does demote Landau. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prince's-plume is morphophonemics.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fence does not brad prince's-plume and is noncurrent.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the fence does not brad prince's-plume but it is noncurrent does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the prince's-plume is not morphophonemics.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the conima is nonindulgent.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the conima does brad alluvium.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the conima does brad alluvium and it demotes Landau.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__