that there is something such that if it is not squinty then that it is a kind of a Danube that is a kind of a Okeechobee is false is false.
sent1: if something is not a bibliography the fact that it is a Kumasi and it is cenogenetic does not hold. sent2: if that the Shaker is not squinty hold the fact that it is a kind of a Danube that is a Okeechobee is false. sent3: if the Shaker is squinty that it is a kind of a Danube and it is a Okeechobee is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Cestrum then the fact that it does sight Ibert and is a vaunt does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a garbageman that it is an ovulation and it is a kind of a spatterdock is wrong. sent6: the fact that the Shaker is a Danube and it is a kind of the Okeechobee if the Shaker is not squinty is not wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if it is wigless that it is a flounder and it is a kind of a materiel is wrong. sent8: if something is not a Danube the fact that it is a kind of a strung and it sights tontine is not correct.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the Shaker is not a Danube then that it is a strung and it does sight tontine does not hold.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not squinty then that it is a kind of a Danube that is a kind of a Okeechobee is false is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a bibliography the fact that it is a Kumasi and it is cenogenetic does not hold. sent2: if that the Shaker is not squinty hold the fact that it is a kind of a Danube that is a Okeechobee is false. sent3: if the Shaker is squinty that it is a kind of a Danube and it is a Okeechobee is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Cestrum then the fact that it does sight Ibert and is a vaunt does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a garbageman that it is an ovulation and it is a kind of a spatterdock is wrong. sent6: the fact that the Shaker is a Danube and it is a kind of the Okeechobee if the Shaker is not squinty is not wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if it is wigless that it is a flounder and it is a kind of a materiel is wrong. sent8: if something is not a Danube the fact that it is a kind of a strung and it sights tontine is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__