the fact that the fronting council happens is not correct.
sent1: the fronting council occurs and the legislation occurs if that the upstreamness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the conspiring happens and/or the fronting morsel does not occur if the impreciseness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the upstreamness occurs hold. sent4: the jurisprudentialness does not occur but the idolization occurs if the unclasping does not occur. sent5: that the fronting toolmaker does not occur and the debarkation does not occur is caused by that the tornado does not occur. sent6: the tornado does not occur and the repining seigneur occurs if the jurisprudentialness does not occur. sent7: that the impreciseness does not occur but the confusing memo occurs is triggered by that the actuarialness does not occur. sent8: the legislation occurs. sent9: if the debarkation does not occur then the fact that either the selection happens or the fronting Greco occurs or both does not hold. sent10: the actuarialness does not occur if the fact that the selection or the fronting Greco or both occurs is not right. sent11: the conspiring and/or that the fronting morsel does not occur prevents that the upstreamness happens.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: both the legislation and the upstreamness happens.;
the fronting council occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fronting council happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fronting council occurs and the legislation occurs if that the upstreamness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the conspiring happens and/or the fronting morsel does not occur if the impreciseness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the upstreamness occurs hold. sent4: the jurisprudentialness does not occur but the idolization occurs if the unclasping does not occur. sent5: that the fronting toolmaker does not occur and the debarkation does not occur is caused by that the tornado does not occur. sent6: the tornado does not occur and the repining seigneur occurs if the jurisprudentialness does not occur. sent7: that the impreciseness does not occur but the confusing memo occurs is triggered by that the actuarialness does not occur. sent8: the legislation occurs. sent9: if the debarkation does not occur then the fact that either the selection happens or the fronting Greco occurs or both does not hold. sent10: the actuarialness does not occur if the fact that the selection or the fronting Greco or both occurs is not right. sent11: the conspiring and/or that the fronting morsel does not occur prevents that the upstreamness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: both the legislation and the upstreamness happens.; __UNKNOWN__