there is something such that it is not a disharmony.
sent1: if the fact that the ascocarp is both not an advisory and not a Southwestern is false it is not a recoil. sent2: something that is not a recoil does not perseverate Sceloporus. sent3: the tetracycline is not binaural if it is a kind of a disharmony. sent4: if the tetracycline does not impede snapshot it is not a disharmony. sent5: if that something is not a calcium-cyanamide is not incorrect then it does not impede snapshot or is a kind of a disharmony or both. sent6: that the wattle is theosophical and is non-binaural is not true if the tetracycline does not bank Callorhinus. sent7: the wattle is theosophical thing that is binaural. sent8: if something is not non-binaural then it does not bank Callorhinus. sent9: the wattle is theosophical. sent10: if that something is theosophical thing that is not binaural is not correct the fact that it is not reticulate is not false. sent11: something does not impede snapshot if it is binaural. sent12: if the wattle does not bank Callorhinus that the tetracycline bank Callorhinus and it impedes snapshot is not right. sent13: that the tetracycline is not a calcium-cyanamide is correct if the ascocarp does not perseverate Sceloporus.
sent7 -> int1: that the wattle is not binaural is not true.; sent8 -> int2: if the wattle is binaural then it does not bank Callorhinus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wattle does not bank Callorhinus.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the tetracycline banks Callorhinus and it impedes snapshot is false is correct.;
the wattle is not reticulate.
sent10 -> int5: the wattle is not reticulate if that it is theosophical and it is not binaural is wrong.; sent5 -> int6: if the tetracycline is not a kind of a calcium-cyanamide either it does not impede snapshot or it is a kind of a disharmony or both.; sent2 -> int7: if the ascocarp is not a recoil then it does not perseverate Sceloporus.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not a disharmony. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the ascocarp is both not an advisory and not a Southwestern is false it is not a recoil. sent2: something that is not a recoil does not perseverate Sceloporus. sent3: the tetracycline is not binaural if it is a kind of a disharmony. sent4: if the tetracycline does not impede snapshot it is not a disharmony. sent5: if that something is not a calcium-cyanamide is not incorrect then it does not impede snapshot or is a kind of a disharmony or both. sent6: that the wattle is theosophical and is non-binaural is not true if the tetracycline does not bank Callorhinus. sent7: the wattle is theosophical thing that is binaural. sent8: if something is not non-binaural then it does not bank Callorhinus. sent9: the wattle is theosophical. sent10: if that something is theosophical thing that is not binaural is not correct the fact that it is not reticulate is not false. sent11: something does not impede snapshot if it is binaural. sent12: if the wattle does not bank Callorhinus that the tetracycline bank Callorhinus and it impedes snapshot is not right. sent13: that the tetracycline is not a calcium-cyanamide is correct if the ascocarp does not perseverate Sceloporus. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the wattle is not binaural is not true.; sent8 -> int2: if the wattle is binaural then it does not bank Callorhinus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wattle does not bank Callorhinus.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the tetracycline banks Callorhinus and it impedes snapshot is false is correct.; __UNKNOWN__