the granulation is tutorial.
sent1: the granulation is resistive if the fact that the ribgrass does not stoke ribgrass but it is curricular does not hold. sent2: the anticipator is not curricular. sent3: The ribgrass does stoke ribgrass. sent4: the granulation is a kind of a archduchess. sent5: the ribgrass is a tutorial if the granulation is not curricular. sent6: the fact that the granulation does stoke ribgrass hold if that the ribgrass is non-curricular and resistive does not hold. sent7: if something is resistive it does stoke ribgrass. sent8: the ribgrass is non-resistive thing that is curricular. sent9: the ribgrass does stoke ribgrass. sent10: if something is resistive it is a tutorial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ribgrass does not stoke ribgrass but it is curricular.; assump1 -> int1: the ribgrass does not stoke ribgrass.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the ribgrass does not stoke ribgrass and is curricular is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the granulation is resistive.; sent10 -> int5: the granulation is a tutorial if it is not non-resistive.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the granulation is tutorial. ; $context$ = sent1: the granulation is resistive if the fact that the ribgrass does not stoke ribgrass but it is curricular does not hold. sent2: the anticipator is not curricular. sent3: The ribgrass does stoke ribgrass. sent4: the granulation is a kind of a archduchess. sent5: the ribgrass is a tutorial if the granulation is not curricular. sent6: the fact that the granulation does stoke ribgrass hold if that the ribgrass is non-curricular and resistive does not hold. sent7: if something is resistive it does stoke ribgrass. sent8: the ribgrass is non-resistive thing that is curricular. sent9: the ribgrass does stoke ribgrass. sent10: if something is resistive it is a tutorial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ribgrass does not stoke ribgrass but it is curricular.; assump1 -> int1: the ribgrass does not stoke ribgrass.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the ribgrass does not stoke ribgrass and is curricular is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the granulation is resistive.; sent10 -> int5: the granulation is a tutorial if it is not non-resistive.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__