the plumbing does not occur.
sent1: the non-passiveness or that the gassing does not occur or both is caused by the electrocution. sent2: that the rebellion does not occur is prevented by that the gassing does not occur and the electrocution does not occur. sent3: that the passiveness does not occur is prevented by that the imbricating does not occur. sent4: that both the passive and the plumbing occurs prevents that the electrocution happens. sent5: that the rerunning hollyhock does not occur and/or that the rerunning napping does not occur prevents the gassing. sent6: the rerunning hollyhock occurs or the rerunning napping does not occur or both. sent7: the rebellion does not occur and the rerunning napping occurs if the rerunning hollyhock happens. sent8: the imbricating does not occur. sent9: if the melanizing occurs then the rebellion does not occur. sent10: the rerunning hollyhock does not occur. sent11: the melanizing happens.
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the passive occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the plumbing occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the passive happens and the plumbing occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the electrocution does not occur.; sent10 -> int4: either the rerunning hollyhock does not occur or the rerunning napping does not occur or both.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the gassing does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the gassing does not occur and the electrocution does not occur.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the rebellion happens.; sent9 & sent11 -> int8: the rebellion does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the plumbing happens is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the plumbing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-passiveness or that the gassing does not occur or both is caused by the electrocution. sent2: that the rebellion does not occur is prevented by that the gassing does not occur and the electrocution does not occur. sent3: that the passiveness does not occur is prevented by that the imbricating does not occur. sent4: that both the passive and the plumbing occurs prevents that the electrocution happens. sent5: that the rerunning hollyhock does not occur and/or that the rerunning napping does not occur prevents the gassing. sent6: the rerunning hollyhock occurs or the rerunning napping does not occur or both. sent7: the rebellion does not occur and the rerunning napping occurs if the rerunning hollyhock happens. sent8: the imbricating does not occur. sent9: if the melanizing occurs then the rebellion does not occur. sent10: the rerunning hollyhock does not occur. sent11: the melanizing happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the passive occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the plumbing occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the passive happens and the plumbing occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the electrocution does not occur.; sent10 -> int4: either the rerunning hollyhock does not occur or the rerunning napping does not occur or both.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the gassing does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the gassing does not occur and the electrocution does not occur.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the rebellion happens.; sent9 & sent11 -> int8: the rebellion does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__