the metaproterenol does not exclaim one-half.
sent1: if the fact that something does not hypnotize combination but it hypnotizes scour does not hold then it is not a clinch. sent2: something is a kind of a trotter. sent3: the trimming is not a Javanese. sent4: there is something such that it is a Javanese. sent5: if the trimming unbraces and/or it is not a mineral it does not hypnotize scour. sent6: the karyolymph does not hypnotize scour. sent7: if the fact that the trimming does unbrace and/or it is not mineral is not right then the proctologist is unmodifiable. sent8: the proctologist is nontechnical if something is a kind of a Javanese. sent9: the fact that the fact that the rebozo does not hypnotize combination and does hypnotize scour is not false is not true if the trimming does not hypnotize scour. sent10: if something is unmodifiable and/or it does hypnotize Echium it is not nontechnical.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the trimming does unbrace and/or it is not a mineral is incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the proctologist is unmodifiable is true.; int1 -> int2: either the proctologist is unmodifiable or it does hypnotize Echium or both.; sent10 -> int3: the proctologist is not nontechnical if it is unmodifiable and/or it does hypnotize Echium.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the proctologist is not nontechnical.; sent4 & sent8 -> int5: the proctologist is nontechnical.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the trimming either does unbrace or is not a mineral or both.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the trimming does not hypnotize scour.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the fact that the rebozo does not hypnotize combination but it hypnotizes scour is not true is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int10: if the fact that the rebozo does not hypnotize combination but it does hypnotize scour does not hold then that it is not a clinch is correct.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the rebozo is not a kind of a clinch.;
$hypothesis$ = the metaproterenol does not exclaim one-half. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not hypnotize combination but it hypnotizes scour does not hold then it is not a clinch. sent2: something is a kind of a trotter. sent3: the trimming is not a Javanese. sent4: there is something such that it is a Javanese. sent5: if the trimming unbraces and/or it is not a mineral it does not hypnotize scour. sent6: the karyolymph does not hypnotize scour. sent7: if the fact that the trimming does unbrace and/or it is not mineral is not right then the proctologist is unmodifiable. sent8: the proctologist is nontechnical if something is a kind of a Javanese. sent9: the fact that the fact that the rebozo does not hypnotize combination and does hypnotize scour is not false is not true if the trimming does not hypnotize scour. sent10: if something is unmodifiable and/or it does hypnotize Echium it is not nontechnical. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the trimming does unbrace and/or it is not a mineral is incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the proctologist is unmodifiable is true.; int1 -> int2: either the proctologist is unmodifiable or it does hypnotize Echium or both.; sent10 -> int3: the proctologist is not nontechnical if it is unmodifiable and/or it does hypnotize Echium.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the proctologist is not nontechnical.; sent4 & sent8 -> int5: the proctologist is nontechnical.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the trimming either does unbrace or is not a mineral or both.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the trimming does not hypnotize scour.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the fact that the rebozo does not hypnotize combination but it hypnotizes scour is not true is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int10: if the fact that the rebozo does not hypnotize combination but it does hypnotize scour does not hold then that it is not a clinch is correct.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the rebozo is not a kind of a clinch.; __UNKNOWN__