the fact that the imp despairs Coloradan is correct.
sent1: if the mulatto is not effervescent the thoroughfare is a Diptera. sent2: that that the thoroughfare is noneffervescent and does not rustle slinging is false is right. sent3: if the rivulus is not a Sunderland the Coloradan is noneffervescent. sent4: if that the thoroughfare is not noneffervescent and does not rustle slinging is not true then the jamb is not evangelical. sent5: if the fact that the Coloradan is noneffervescent hold then that the thoroughfare is noneffervescent but it does not rustle slinging does not hold. sent6: if the bat is a Anabantidae then the mulatto is not a Montaigne. sent7: that the thoroughfare is not noneffervescent but it does rustle slinging is not correct. sent8: if the bat is not a kind of a Montaigne then the fact that the rivulus is not a Montaigne or not a Sunderland or both is not false. sent9: the fact that something is not a Diptera and despairs Coloradan does not hold if it is not a Anabantidae. sent10: if the Coloradan is noneffervescent then that the thoroughfare is not noneffervescent and it does not rustle slinging does not hold. sent11: that that the mulatto is not a Diptera and it is not a Sunderland is not incorrect is not correct if the rivulus is a kind of a Diptera. sent12: the hypochondria is autosomal if the jamb is not evangelical. sent13: the mulatto is a Anabantidae if it is a Diptera. sent14: that the thoroughfare is effervescent but it rustles slinging is incorrect if the Coloradan is not effervescent. sent15: the hypochondria is noneffervescent if the thoroughfare is not autosomal. sent16: if the mulatto is a Anabantidae then the bat is not a Montaigne. sent17: if the rivulus is not a Montaigne that the fact that the bat is a Sunderland and it is a kind of a Anabantidae is wrong is not incorrect. sent18: the mulatto is a Diptera. sent19: if that the rivulus is not a Montaigne is not wrong then the Coloradan is not effervescent.
sent13 & sent18 -> int1: the mulatto is a kind of a Anabantidae.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the bat is not a Montaigne.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the rivulus is not a Montaigne or it is not a Sunderland or both.; int3 & sent19 & sent3 -> int4: the Coloradan is noneffervescent.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the fact that the thoroughfare is a kind of non-noneffervescent thing that does not rustle slinging is not right.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the jamb is not evangelical.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the hypochondria is autosomal.;
the imp does not despair Coloradan.
sent9 -> int8: the fact that the mulatto is not a kind of a Diptera but it does despair Coloradan is false if that it is not a Anabantidae hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the imp despairs Coloradan is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mulatto is not effervescent the thoroughfare is a Diptera. sent2: that that the thoroughfare is noneffervescent and does not rustle slinging is false is right. sent3: if the rivulus is not a Sunderland the Coloradan is noneffervescent. sent4: if that the thoroughfare is not noneffervescent and does not rustle slinging is not true then the jamb is not evangelical. sent5: if the fact that the Coloradan is noneffervescent hold then that the thoroughfare is noneffervescent but it does not rustle slinging does not hold. sent6: if the bat is a Anabantidae then the mulatto is not a Montaigne. sent7: that the thoroughfare is not noneffervescent but it does rustle slinging is not correct. sent8: if the bat is not a kind of a Montaigne then the fact that the rivulus is not a Montaigne or not a Sunderland or both is not false. sent9: the fact that something is not a Diptera and despairs Coloradan does not hold if it is not a Anabantidae. sent10: if the Coloradan is noneffervescent then that the thoroughfare is not noneffervescent and it does not rustle slinging does not hold. sent11: that that the mulatto is not a Diptera and it is not a Sunderland is not incorrect is not correct if the rivulus is a kind of a Diptera. sent12: the hypochondria is autosomal if the jamb is not evangelical. sent13: the mulatto is a Anabantidae if it is a Diptera. sent14: that the thoroughfare is effervescent but it rustles slinging is incorrect if the Coloradan is not effervescent. sent15: the hypochondria is noneffervescent if the thoroughfare is not autosomal. sent16: if the mulatto is a Anabantidae then the bat is not a Montaigne. sent17: if the rivulus is not a Montaigne that the fact that the bat is a Sunderland and it is a kind of a Anabantidae is wrong is not incorrect. sent18: the mulatto is a Diptera. sent19: if that the rivulus is not a Montaigne is not wrong then the Coloradan is not effervescent. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent18 -> int1: the mulatto is a kind of a Anabantidae.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the bat is not a Montaigne.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the rivulus is not a Montaigne or it is not a Sunderland or both.; int3 & sent19 & sent3 -> int4: the Coloradan is noneffervescent.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the fact that the thoroughfare is a kind of non-noneffervescent thing that does not rustle slinging is not right.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the jamb is not evangelical.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the hypochondria is autosomal.; __UNKNOWN__