the laboring c occurs.
sent1: the rehabilitating axolotl and the spending bastinado occurs if the commensal does not occur. sent2: the spending gulch but not the legislatorship happens. sent3: if the moiling does not occur the helpdesk but not the laboring c happens. sent4: if the fact that the commensal occurs and the spending bastinado does not occur does not hold then the spending bastinado occurs. sent5: the laboring dynamics occurs and the moiling happens. sent6: the fact that the commensal but not the spending bastinado happens is incorrect if the helpdesk occurs. sent7: the commensalness does not occur if that the prematureness occurs and/or the Javaneseness happens is false. sent8: if the spending bastinado happens then the albuminuricness occurs. sent9: if the spending gulch happens and the legislatorship does not occur the nonechoicness happens. sent10: the divarication does not occur. sent11: if the divarication does not occur that both the legislatorship and the spending gulch occurs is not true. sent12: the helpdesk does not occur if the laboring dynamics happens and the nonechoicness occurs. sent13: that the prematureness happens and/or the Javaneseness happens is incorrect. sent14: the laboring c does not occur if the rehabilitating axolotl but not the helpdesk occurs.
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the commensal does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the rehabilitating axolotl happens and the spending bastinado occurs.; int2 -> int3: the rehabilitating axolotl happens.; sent5 -> int4: the laboring dynamics happens.; sent9 & sent2 -> int5: the nonechoicness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the laboring dynamics and the nonechoicness happens.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: that the helpdesk does not occur is true.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the rehabilitating axolotl occurs and the helpdesk does not occur.; int8 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the albuminuricness happens and the pronouncing happens.
sent11 & sent10 -> int9: that the legislatorship and the spending gulch occurs does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the laboring c occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the rehabilitating axolotl and the spending bastinado occurs if the commensal does not occur. sent2: the spending gulch but not the legislatorship happens. sent3: if the moiling does not occur the helpdesk but not the laboring c happens. sent4: if the fact that the commensal occurs and the spending bastinado does not occur does not hold then the spending bastinado occurs. sent5: the laboring dynamics occurs and the moiling happens. sent6: the fact that the commensal but not the spending bastinado happens is incorrect if the helpdesk occurs. sent7: the commensalness does not occur if that the prematureness occurs and/or the Javaneseness happens is false. sent8: if the spending bastinado happens then the albuminuricness occurs. sent9: if the spending gulch happens and the legislatorship does not occur the nonechoicness happens. sent10: the divarication does not occur. sent11: if the divarication does not occur that both the legislatorship and the spending gulch occurs is not true. sent12: the helpdesk does not occur if the laboring dynamics happens and the nonechoicness occurs. sent13: that the prematureness happens and/or the Javaneseness happens is incorrect. sent14: the laboring c does not occur if the rehabilitating axolotl but not the helpdesk occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the commensal does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the rehabilitating axolotl happens and the spending bastinado occurs.; int2 -> int3: the rehabilitating axolotl happens.; sent5 -> int4: the laboring dynamics happens.; sent9 & sent2 -> int5: the nonechoicness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the laboring dynamics and the nonechoicness happens.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: that the helpdesk does not occur is true.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the rehabilitating axolotl occurs and the helpdesk does not occur.; int8 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__