the catholicness does not occur.
sent1: the shrinking Pilgrim occurs if the stealing does not occur. sent2: both the energy and the unactableness occurs. sent3: that both the shrinking breadwinner and the bungling happens is wrong if the tread does not occur. sent4: the allomerism occurs. sent5: the phenotypicalness occurs. sent6: that the handicraft does not occur causes that the subrogation does not occur. sent7: that the rut occurs is not wrong. sent8: that the bungling does not occur is brought about by that the shrinking mizzenmast and the non-Tajikistaniness occurs. sent9: the tread does not occur if the obligateness and the handicraft happens. sent10: if the handicraft does not occur then that either the shrinking mizzenmast does not occur or the subrogation happens or both is incorrect. sent11: the non-transculturalness leads to that both the unidirectionalness and the bibliolatry happens. sent12: the obligating happens. sent13: if that the discriminatingness does not occur is not false the allomerism happens. sent14: that the catholicness occurs is not false if the fact that either the shrinking mizzenmast does not occur or the subrogation occurs or both does not hold. sent15: the discriminating does not occur. sent16: the fact that either the tread does not occur or the shrinking breadwinner does not occur or both is not right if the bungling does not occur. sent17: if that the shrinking breadwinner and the bungling happens does not hold the Tajikistaniness does not occur. sent18: the fact that the obscenity happens hold. sent19: the fact that the subrogation does not occur is not incorrect. sent20: the Tajikistaniness happens and the allomerism happens if the discriminating does not occur. sent21: that the chloroticness does not occur is not wrong if the handicraft does not occur and/or the obligating does not occur. sent22: the Tajikistaniness does not occur if the bungling does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handicraft happens.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the obligating and the handicraft occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the tread does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the shrinking breadwinner happens and the bungling occurs is not right.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the Tajikistaniness does not occur.; sent20 & sent15 -> int5: the Tajikistaniness happens and the allomerism happens.; int5 -> int6: the Tajikistaniness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the handicraft does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: that the shrinking mizzenmast does not occur and/or the subrogation occurs is not true.; int9 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the chloroticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the catholicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the shrinking Pilgrim occurs if the stealing does not occur. sent2: both the energy and the unactableness occurs. sent3: that both the shrinking breadwinner and the bungling happens is wrong if the tread does not occur. sent4: the allomerism occurs. sent5: the phenotypicalness occurs. sent6: that the handicraft does not occur causes that the subrogation does not occur. sent7: that the rut occurs is not wrong. sent8: that the bungling does not occur is brought about by that the shrinking mizzenmast and the non-Tajikistaniness occurs. sent9: the tread does not occur if the obligateness and the handicraft happens. sent10: if the handicraft does not occur then that either the shrinking mizzenmast does not occur or the subrogation happens or both is incorrect. sent11: the non-transculturalness leads to that both the unidirectionalness and the bibliolatry happens. sent12: the obligating happens. sent13: if that the discriminatingness does not occur is not false the allomerism happens. sent14: that the catholicness occurs is not false if the fact that either the shrinking mizzenmast does not occur or the subrogation occurs or both does not hold. sent15: the discriminating does not occur. sent16: the fact that either the tread does not occur or the shrinking breadwinner does not occur or both is not right if the bungling does not occur. sent17: if that the shrinking breadwinner and the bungling happens does not hold the Tajikistaniness does not occur. sent18: the fact that the obscenity happens hold. sent19: the fact that the subrogation does not occur is not incorrect. sent20: the Tajikistaniness happens and the allomerism happens if the discriminating does not occur. sent21: that the chloroticness does not occur is not wrong if the handicraft does not occur and/or the obligating does not occur. sent22: the Tajikistaniness does not occur if the bungling does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handicraft happens.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the obligating and the handicraft occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the tread does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the shrinking breadwinner happens and the bungling occurs is not right.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the Tajikistaniness does not occur.; sent20 & sent15 -> int5: the Tajikistaniness happens and the allomerism happens.; int5 -> int6: the Tajikistaniness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the handicraft does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: that the shrinking mizzenmast does not occur and/or the subrogation occurs is not true.; int9 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__