either the leveling foregrounding does not occur or the retroactiveness does not occur or both if the caffeinicness occurs.
sent1: if both the categoricalness and the habitation happens the fact that the fidgeting antipyretic happens is not false. sent2: the aerophilatelicness does not occur if the fact that the leveling foregrounding happens and the aerophilatelicness happens is false. sent3: the leveling visa happens. sent4: if the caffeinicness happens either the leveling foregrounding does not occur or the retroactiveness happens or both. sent5: the leveling foregrounding happens and/or the retroactiveness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the caffeinicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leveling foregrounding happens.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the leveling foregrounding happens and the leveling visa occurs.;
the aerophilatelicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = either the leveling foregrounding does not occur or the retroactiveness does not occur or both if the caffeinicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if both the categoricalness and the habitation happens the fact that the fidgeting antipyretic happens is not false. sent2: the aerophilatelicness does not occur if the fact that the leveling foregrounding happens and the aerophilatelicness happens is false. sent3: the leveling visa happens. sent4: if the caffeinicness happens either the leveling foregrounding does not occur or the retroactiveness happens or both. sent5: the leveling foregrounding happens and/or the retroactiveness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the caffeinicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leveling foregrounding happens.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the leveling foregrounding happens and the leveling visa occurs.; __UNKNOWN__