there exists something such that if it does fret Spica and is not a stipendiary then the fact that it interleaves politeness is not wrong.
sent1: if something that frets Spica is stipendiary it does interleave politeness. sent2: the omnivore is immunotherapeutic if it frets Spica and it does not fret Arctocephalus. sent3: if something does interleave half-holiday and is husbandly then it does interleave unpointedness. sent4: if something does fret Spica but it is not a stipendiary it does interleave politeness. sent5: that there is something such that if it is both a biologism and not an altarpiece then it is a pope is not false. sent6: there exists something such that if it does fret Spica and is a stipendiary then the fact that it does interleave politeness is correct. sent7: the omnivore interleaves politeness if the fact that it does fret Spica and is a kind of a stipendiary is right. sent8: something is torrential if it is a Kura that does not contradistinguish lira. sent9: if a Erigeron is insectivorous that it is a vasopressor is true.
sent4 -> int1: if the omnivore does fret Spica but it is not stipendiary then the fact that it interleaves politeness is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is a Kura that does not contradistinguish lira then it is torrential.
sent8 -> int2: if the menhir is a kind of a Kura that does not contradistinguish lira it is torrential.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does fret Spica and is not a stipendiary then the fact that it interleaves politeness is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that frets Spica is stipendiary it does interleave politeness. sent2: the omnivore is immunotherapeutic if it frets Spica and it does not fret Arctocephalus. sent3: if something does interleave half-holiday and is husbandly then it does interleave unpointedness. sent4: if something does fret Spica but it is not a stipendiary it does interleave politeness. sent5: that there is something such that if it is both a biologism and not an altarpiece then it is a pope is not false. sent6: there exists something such that if it does fret Spica and is a stipendiary then the fact that it does interleave politeness is correct. sent7: the omnivore interleaves politeness if the fact that it does fret Spica and is a kind of a stipendiary is right. sent8: something is torrential if it is a Kura that does not contradistinguish lira. sent9: if a Erigeron is insectivorous that it is a vasopressor is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the omnivore does fret Spica but it is not stipendiary then the fact that it interleaves politeness is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__