the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not pyloric is not incorrect then that it is not French and it is not a histone does not hold is not correct.
sent1: if something is non-pyloric then it does not French and it is not a kind of a histone. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not pyloric the fact that the fact that it is non-French thing that is a kind of a histone hold is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a greenwood the fact that it does not subside appliance and it is removable is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is not pyloric then the fact that it Frenches and is not a kind of a histone does not hold. sent5: if the appliance is not pyloric that it is a kind of non-French a histone does not hold. sent6: the fact that something does not subside unacceptability and does not retract is not right if it is not a kind of a cloverleaf. sent7: the fact that the appliance is a duckpins but it does not French does not hold if it is not diamagnetic. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not pyloric it is non-French and it is not a histone. sent9: the fact that something is not French and it is not a histone is false if it is pyloric. sent10: the fact that something is not a kind of a French and it is not a histone is not true if it is not pyloric. sent11: if something is not pyloric then that it is not non-French and it is not a histone is not correct. sent12: the appliance is not a French and is not a kind of a histone if it is not pyloric. sent13: that something is a kind of non-French thing that is a histone is not true if it is not pyloric. sent14: that the paisley is not pyloric and it is not a mansard is false if it emaciates. sent15: if the appliance is not pyloric the fact that it is French and it is not a kind of a histone does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a software that it is not uneager and it is unicellular is wrong. sent17: that the appliance is not French and it is not a histone does not hold if it is pyloric. sent18: if something is not a kind of a microcosm the fact that it is a constituent and is not a kind of a refresher does not hold.
sent10 -> int1: that the appliance is a kind of non-French thing that is not a kind of a histone is not right if it is not pyloric.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not pyloric is not incorrect then that it is not French and it is not a histone does not hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is non-pyloric then it does not French and it is not a kind of a histone. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not pyloric the fact that the fact that it is non-French thing that is a kind of a histone hold is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a greenwood the fact that it does not subside appliance and it is removable is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is not pyloric then the fact that it Frenches and is not a kind of a histone does not hold. sent5: if the appliance is not pyloric that it is a kind of non-French a histone does not hold. sent6: the fact that something does not subside unacceptability and does not retract is not right if it is not a kind of a cloverleaf. sent7: the fact that the appliance is a duckpins but it does not French does not hold if it is not diamagnetic. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not pyloric it is non-French and it is not a histone. sent9: the fact that something is not French and it is not a histone is false if it is pyloric. sent10: the fact that something is not a kind of a French and it is not a histone is not true if it is not pyloric. sent11: if something is not pyloric then that it is not non-French and it is not a histone is not correct. sent12: the appliance is not a French and is not a kind of a histone if it is not pyloric. sent13: that something is a kind of non-French thing that is a histone is not true if it is not pyloric. sent14: that the paisley is not pyloric and it is not a mansard is false if it emaciates. sent15: if the appliance is not pyloric the fact that it is French and it is not a kind of a histone does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a software that it is not uneager and it is unicellular is wrong. sent17: that the appliance is not French and it is not a histone does not hold if it is pyloric. sent18: if something is not a kind of a microcosm the fact that it is a constituent and is not a kind of a refresher does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: that the appliance is a kind of non-French thing that is not a kind of a histone is not right if it is not pyloric.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__