the photostating waiting happens.
sent1: that the chlorophylloseness does not occur is caused by that the precocialness happens. sent2: that the Odyssey does not occur brings about that both the harvesting and the precocialness occurs. sent3: the roofing happens. sent4: the harvest occurs and/or the Odyssey does not occur. sent5: the non-precocialness results in that both the congratulating and the chlorophylloseness happens. sent6: that the harvesting happens or that the Odyssey does not occur or both prevents the precocialness. sent7: if the palavering does not occur that the imperceptibleness happens but the wowing concerto does not occur is false. sent8: the Odyssey does not occur if that the imperceptibleness but not the wowing concerto happens is incorrect. sent9: the congratulating does not occur but the roofing happens if the chlorophylloseness does not occur. sent10: if the endocrine occurs and the wowing berry does not occur the gratifying occurs. sent11: the photostating waiting does not occur if the fact that the endocrine happens and the wowing berry does not occur is false. sent12: that if the gratifying occurs and the conic happens the congratulating does not occur is true. sent13: the conic is caused by that the roofing happens. sent14: if that the photostating carpeted does not occur is correct then the fact that the photostating Scaridae happens and the backing occurs is incorrect. sent15: that the photostating Amphisbaena does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: the palaver does not occur if the fact that the photostating Scaridae happens and the backing happens is not right. sent17: that both the canfield and the illegitimateness occurs causes the differentiableness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the endocrineness but not the wowing berry happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the gratifying happens.; sent13 & sent3 -> int2: the conicness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that both the gratifying and the conicness happens is not incorrect.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the congratulating does not occur.; sent6 & sent4 -> int5: the precocialness does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the congratulating and the chlorophylloseness occurs.; int6 -> int7: the congratulating happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the endocrineness happens and the wowing berry does not occur is incorrect.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the photostating waiting occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the photostating waiting happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the chlorophylloseness does not occur is caused by that the precocialness happens. sent2: that the Odyssey does not occur brings about that both the harvesting and the precocialness occurs. sent3: the roofing happens. sent4: the harvest occurs and/or the Odyssey does not occur. sent5: the non-precocialness results in that both the congratulating and the chlorophylloseness happens. sent6: that the harvesting happens or that the Odyssey does not occur or both prevents the precocialness. sent7: if the palavering does not occur that the imperceptibleness happens but the wowing concerto does not occur is false. sent8: the Odyssey does not occur if that the imperceptibleness but not the wowing concerto happens is incorrect. sent9: the congratulating does not occur but the roofing happens if the chlorophylloseness does not occur. sent10: if the endocrine occurs and the wowing berry does not occur the gratifying occurs. sent11: the photostating waiting does not occur if the fact that the endocrine happens and the wowing berry does not occur is false. sent12: that if the gratifying occurs and the conic happens the congratulating does not occur is true. sent13: the conic is caused by that the roofing happens. sent14: if that the photostating carpeted does not occur is correct then the fact that the photostating Scaridae happens and the backing occurs is incorrect. sent15: that the photostating Amphisbaena does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: the palaver does not occur if the fact that the photostating Scaridae happens and the backing happens is not right. sent17: that both the canfield and the illegitimateness occurs causes the differentiableness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the endocrineness but not the wowing berry happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the gratifying happens.; sent13 & sent3 -> int2: the conicness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that both the gratifying and the conicness happens is not incorrect.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the congratulating does not occur.; sent6 & sent4 -> int5: the precocialness does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the congratulating and the chlorophylloseness occurs.; int6 -> int7: the congratulating happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the endocrineness happens and the wowing berry does not occur is incorrect.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__