that that both the conjuncture and the misremembering occurs is brought about by that the glaring does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the Galwegianness happens. sent2: that the exercise and the cowardliness occurs is wrong. sent3: that both the exercising and the non-cowardliness happens is wrong. sent4: if the fact that that not the stooping but the glaring happens is correct is not true the conjuncture occurs. sent5: that the fact that both the stooping and the glare happens is correct is not true. sent6: the conjuncture is caused by that the stooping happens. sent7: if that the exercise happens and the cowardliness does not occur is not right then the misremembering occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the stoop but the glaring occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the glare occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the glaring does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stooping does not occur and the glaring happens is wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the conjuncture occurs.; sent7 & sent3 -> int5: the misremembering occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the conjuncture and the misremembering happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that both the conjuncture and the misremembering occurs is brought about by that the glaring does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Galwegianness happens. sent2: that the exercise and the cowardliness occurs is wrong. sent3: that both the exercising and the non-cowardliness happens is wrong. sent4: if the fact that that not the stooping but the glaring happens is correct is not true the conjuncture occurs. sent5: that the fact that both the stooping and the glare happens is correct is not true. sent6: the conjuncture is caused by that the stooping happens. sent7: if that the exercise happens and the cowardliness does not occur is not right then the misremembering occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the stoop but the glaring occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the glare occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the glaring does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stooping does not occur and the glaring happens is wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the conjuncture occurs.; sent7 & sent3 -> int5: the misremembering occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the conjuncture and the misremembering happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__