there is something such that if the fact that it is not an ethics and does not wrest treachery does not hold then it does admit.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is not biotypic and does not swear is false the fact that it is a mantissa hold. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not an ethics and does wrest treachery is not correct it admits. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is an ethics and it does not wrest treachery is incorrect it admits. sent4: if the priory is an ethics then it admits. sent5: the priory does admit if that it is not an ethics and it does wrest treachery is wrong. sent6: there is something such that if it wrests treachery then it admits. sent7: if the fact that something is not an ethics and does not wrest treachery is wrong then it admits. sent8: that the priory admits if that the priory is not an ethics and does not wrest treachery hold is right. sent9: if something is not an ethics and it does not wrest treachery it does admit. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is not a Methodism and it is not a kind of a microphage does not hold it is sobering. sent11: there exists something such that if it is an ethics it does admit. sent12: there is something such that if it is not an ethics and it does not wrest treachery it does admit.
sent7 -> int1: the priory admits if the fact that it is not an ethics and it does not wrest treachery is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is not an ethics and does not wrest treachery does not hold then it does admit. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is not biotypic and does not swear is false the fact that it is a mantissa hold. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not an ethics and does wrest treachery is not correct it admits. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is an ethics and it does not wrest treachery is incorrect it admits. sent4: if the priory is an ethics then it admits. sent5: the priory does admit if that it is not an ethics and it does wrest treachery is wrong. sent6: there is something such that if it wrests treachery then it admits. sent7: if the fact that something is not an ethics and does not wrest treachery is wrong then it admits. sent8: that the priory admits if that the priory is not an ethics and does not wrest treachery hold is right. sent9: if something is not an ethics and it does not wrest treachery it does admit. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is not a Methodism and it is not a kind of a microphage does not hold it is sobering. sent11: there exists something such that if it is an ethics it does admit. sent12: there is something such that if it is not an ethics and it does not wrest treachery it does admit. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the priory admits if the fact that it is not an ethics and it does not wrest treachery is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__