that the buccalness does not occur if the thunderhead happens is false.
sent1: the cash-and-carriness does not occur if the facelift does not occur. sent2: the unangriness occurs if the monotonicness happens. sent3: that the segregating aperture does not occur is not false if the Hadith does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the bibliophilicness does not occur is correct the thunderhead does not occur. sent5: the carjacking mustard but not the Hadith occurs if the logisticness happens. sent6: that the buccalness does not occur and the thunderhead does not occur is not right if that the availableness occurs is not wrong. sent7: the buccalness does not occur if that the roundhouse happens is wrong. sent8: that the flocking brioche does not occur is triggered by that the collectiveness does not occur. sent9: the segregating petard happens. sent10: the dadoing Maeandra occurs. sent11: if the roundhouse occurs then not the pant but the segregating petard happens. sent12: the quadrupedalness does not occur. sent13: that the flocking pyrilamine occurs is prevented by the non-unsavoriness. sent14: that the segregating aperture does not occur brings about that the dependentness and the availableness happens. sent15: that not the panting but the segregating petard occurs results in the non-bibliophilicness. sent16: if not the adrenocorticalness but the segregating aphakic occurs then the guesstimating does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thunderhead happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the roundhouse occurs is not incorrect.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: not the panting but the segregating petard occurs.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the bibliophilicness does not occur.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that the thunderhead does not occur is correct.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the roundhouse does not occur.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the buccalness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the Assumption does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the buccalness does not occur if the thunderhead happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the cash-and-carriness does not occur if the facelift does not occur. sent2: the unangriness occurs if the monotonicness happens. sent3: that the segregating aperture does not occur is not false if the Hadith does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the bibliophilicness does not occur is correct the thunderhead does not occur. sent5: the carjacking mustard but not the Hadith occurs if the logisticness happens. sent6: that the buccalness does not occur and the thunderhead does not occur is not right if that the availableness occurs is not wrong. sent7: the buccalness does not occur if that the roundhouse happens is wrong. sent8: that the flocking brioche does not occur is triggered by that the collectiveness does not occur. sent9: the segregating petard happens. sent10: the dadoing Maeandra occurs. sent11: if the roundhouse occurs then not the pant but the segregating petard happens. sent12: the quadrupedalness does not occur. sent13: that the flocking pyrilamine occurs is prevented by the non-unsavoriness. sent14: that the segregating aperture does not occur brings about that the dependentness and the availableness happens. sent15: that not the panting but the segregating petard occurs results in the non-bibliophilicness. sent16: if not the adrenocorticalness but the segregating aphakic occurs then the guesstimating does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thunderhead happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the roundhouse occurs is not incorrect.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: not the panting but the segregating petard occurs.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the bibliophilicness does not occur.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that the thunderhead does not occur is correct.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the roundhouse does not occur.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the buccalness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__