there is something such that it does trap.
sent1: something does trap if it is semiautobiographical and it is a throb. sent2: the subordinate is a shark if the Peter is a quietness. sent3: the subordinate sharks if the Peter is a kind of a Polynesian. sent4: if the fact that the stroke is not semiautobiographical is correct the spray does not percuss and is a throb. sent5: if the stroke is not a trap or is a kind of an attack or both that the Bolivian attack is not false. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a custody and it replicates consuetude is not true if the fact that it is not a self-deception is right. sent7: if the stroke is not semiautobiographical then the spray does percuss. sent8: that the spray is not semiautobiographical but it is a throb is right if the stroke does not percuss. sent9: the trace is not a kind of a self-deception if that the clerk is a self-deception and it is backing does not hold. sent10: the stroke is semiautobiographical. sent11: the Peter is a Polynesian and/or it is a quietness. sent12: if a non-semiautobiographical thing does percuss it is a throb. sent13: the spray is not a throb but it percusses if the stroke is not semiautobiographical. sent14: the spray is not semiautobiographical. sent15: the spray does not percuss and squires Leptotyphlopidae. sent16: the spray is a trap if it is semiautobiographical and it is a throb. sent17: something does trap if it is non-semiautobiographical and is a throb. sent18: the spray is a kind of a Polynesian if it is not a kind of a self-deception and it is a kind of a ballplayer. sent19: if the fact that the stroke does not percuss is right the spray is not semiautobiographical.
sent17 -> int1: if the spray is not semiautobiographical but it throbs then that it traps is correct.;
the Bolivian is a kind of an attack.
sent6 -> int2: if the trace is not a kind of a self-deception then the fact that it is a custody and replicates consuetude is not right.; sent11 & sent3 & sent2 -> int3: the subordinate is a kind of a shark.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a kind of a shark.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does trap. ; $context$ = sent1: something does trap if it is semiautobiographical and it is a throb. sent2: the subordinate is a shark if the Peter is a quietness. sent3: the subordinate sharks if the Peter is a kind of a Polynesian. sent4: if the fact that the stroke is not semiautobiographical is correct the spray does not percuss and is a throb. sent5: if the stroke is not a trap or is a kind of an attack or both that the Bolivian attack is not false. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a custody and it replicates consuetude is not true if the fact that it is not a self-deception is right. sent7: if the stroke is not semiautobiographical then the spray does percuss. sent8: that the spray is not semiautobiographical but it is a throb is right if the stroke does not percuss. sent9: the trace is not a kind of a self-deception if that the clerk is a self-deception and it is backing does not hold. sent10: the stroke is semiautobiographical. sent11: the Peter is a Polynesian and/or it is a quietness. sent12: if a non-semiautobiographical thing does percuss it is a throb. sent13: the spray is not a throb but it percusses if the stroke is not semiautobiographical. sent14: the spray is not semiautobiographical. sent15: the spray does not percuss and squires Leptotyphlopidae. sent16: the spray is a trap if it is semiautobiographical and it is a throb. sent17: something does trap if it is non-semiautobiographical and is a throb. sent18: the spray is a kind of a Polynesian if it is not a kind of a self-deception and it is a kind of a ballplayer. sent19: if the fact that the stroke does not percuss is right the spray is not semiautobiographical. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: if the spray is not semiautobiographical but it throbs then that it traps is correct.; __UNKNOWN__