the fritter is Botswanan if the berm is a kind of a ablative.
sent1: if something is a kind of a pronator that the fact that it is a draw and it is Botswanan is not incorrect is not right. sent2: the fact that the fritter is a ablative and it is a duodenum is not true. sent3: if the berm flumps it is Demosthenic. sent4: the fritter is both not a duodenum and not a pronator if the asthmatic is not Demosthenic. sent5: the fact that something is a kind of a duodenum but it is not a kind of a ablative is not right if it is an ammunition. sent6: if something is life-support the fact that it is a kind of an ammunition that does not flump is false. sent7: the berm is not Demosthenic. sent8: the berm is a draw if it is a ablative. sent9: if the fritter is not a duodenum and is not a kind of a pronator then it is Botswanan. sent10: if the fritter is a duodenum but it is not a pronator that it is Botswanan is true. sent11: if the berm is a duodenum the fritter is not an ammunition. sent12: if something is unconscientious that it blankets shed and it is a cote is false. sent13: the fritter is an ammunition. sent14: the berm is latter. sent15: the asthmatic is not a kind of a ablative. sent16: the berm is Botswanan if it is life-support. sent17: the fritter is life-support. sent18: the berm does not flump if the fritter is not life-support. sent19: something that is a draw is life-support. sent20: that the asthmatic is not Demosthenic is right if the berm does flump. sent21: if the fritter does draw the berm is life-support. sent22: if the fritter is a draw the berm is not a kind of a ablative. sent23: that the asthmatic is not Demosthenic is right if that the berm is an ammunition but it does not flump is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the berm is a ablative.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the berm does draw.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the berm draws is not wrong it is life-support.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the berm is life-support.; sent6 -> int4: the fact that the berm is an ammunition and does not flump is incorrect if it is life-support.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the berm is an ammunition and does not flump is false.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the asthmatic is not Demosthenic.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the fritter is not a duodenum and not a pronator.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fritter is Botswanan.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fritter is Botswanan if the berm is a kind of a ablative. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a pronator that the fact that it is a draw and it is Botswanan is not incorrect is not right. sent2: the fact that the fritter is a ablative and it is a duodenum is not true. sent3: if the berm flumps it is Demosthenic. sent4: the fritter is both not a duodenum and not a pronator if the asthmatic is not Demosthenic. sent5: the fact that something is a kind of a duodenum but it is not a kind of a ablative is not right if it is an ammunition. sent6: if something is life-support the fact that it is a kind of an ammunition that does not flump is false. sent7: the berm is not Demosthenic. sent8: the berm is a draw if it is a ablative. sent9: if the fritter is not a duodenum and is not a kind of a pronator then it is Botswanan. sent10: if the fritter is a duodenum but it is not a pronator that it is Botswanan is true. sent11: if the berm is a duodenum the fritter is not an ammunition. sent12: if something is unconscientious that it blankets shed and it is a cote is false. sent13: the fritter is an ammunition. sent14: the berm is latter. sent15: the asthmatic is not a kind of a ablative. sent16: the berm is Botswanan if it is life-support. sent17: the fritter is life-support. sent18: the berm does not flump if the fritter is not life-support. sent19: something that is a draw is life-support. sent20: that the asthmatic is not Demosthenic is right if the berm does flump. sent21: if the fritter does draw the berm is life-support. sent22: if the fritter is a draw the berm is not a kind of a ablative. sent23: that the asthmatic is not Demosthenic is right if that the berm is an ammunition but it does not flump is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the berm is a ablative.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the berm does draw.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the berm draws is not wrong it is life-support.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the berm is life-support.; sent6 -> int4: the fact that the berm is an ammunition and does not flump is incorrect if it is life-support.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the berm is an ammunition and does not flump is false.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the asthmatic is not Demosthenic.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the fritter is not a duodenum and not a pronator.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fritter is Botswanan.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__