the fail-safe does not deafen yoga.
sent1: the count is not a varix. sent2: the fugitive is citrous thing that is a Centrarchidae. sent3: if the count is not a varix and does deafen Goldmark then the fugitive is philosophical. sent4: that the fail-safe deafens yoga is true if the count does deafens yoga. sent5: if the fugitive is both philosophical and alterable then the fail-safe does not deafen yoga. sent6: the fugitive is a Centrarchidae. sent7: something is alterable if it is citrous. sent8: the count does deafen Goldmark. sent9: The Goldmark does deafen count.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the count is not a varix and deafens Goldmark.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fugitive is philosophical.; sent7 -> int3: the fugitive is alterable if it is citrous.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the fugitive is not non-citrous is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fugitive is alterable.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the fugitive is philosophical and is alterable.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fail-safe does deafen yoga.
$hypothesis$ = the fail-safe does not deafen yoga. ; $context$ = sent1: the count is not a varix. sent2: the fugitive is citrous thing that is a Centrarchidae. sent3: if the count is not a varix and does deafen Goldmark then the fugitive is philosophical. sent4: that the fail-safe deafens yoga is true if the count does deafens yoga. sent5: if the fugitive is both philosophical and alterable then the fail-safe does not deafen yoga. sent6: the fugitive is a Centrarchidae. sent7: something is alterable if it is citrous. sent8: the count does deafen Goldmark. sent9: The Goldmark does deafen count. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the count is not a varix and deafens Goldmark.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fugitive is philosophical.; sent7 -> int3: the fugitive is alterable if it is citrous.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the fugitive is not non-citrous is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fugitive is alterable.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the fugitive is philosophical and is alterable.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__