the fact that there is something such that if that it absolves and does not undervalue is incorrect it is not subjective hold.
sent1: if that the Marshall is both a hyponatremia and not subjective is not correct then the fact that the fact that it surpasses is not wrong is not right. sent2: if something absolves and does not undervalue it is not subjective. sent3: if that something absolves and does undervalue is not right it is not subjective. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is pentecostal and is not an ala is not right it is a Vaseline. sent5: if the fact that the Marshall is a Bern but it does not undervalue is wrong it does not farm intrusion. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not absolve then it is not subjective. sent7: something is not subjective if it does not absolve. sent8: something is subjective if that it does absolve and does not undervalue does not hold. sent9: the Marshall is not subjective if the fact that it absolves and it undervalues is incorrect. sent10: if the sweetheart knots Lafayette and does not absolve it is not endothermic. sent11: the Marshall is subjective if that it does absolve and it does not undervalue does not hold. sent12: the myelocyte is non-blastomycotic if the fact that it does undervalue and it is a hacker is not correct. sent13: if the garnishee does not shift it does not undervalue. sent14: if something is baric but not a disgusting it is not a kind of a forehand. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it does absolve and it does not undervalue is wrong then it is subjective. sent16: there exists something such that if it does absolve and does not undervalue then it is not subjective. sent17: if the Marshall knots garnishee but it is not subjective then it does not seize. sent18: if that something does absolve and does not undervalue is incorrect then it is non-subjective. sent19: there is something such that if that it absolves and it undervalues does not hold then it is not subjective. sent20: the Marshall is not subjective if it does not absolve.
sent18 -> int1: the Marshall is not subjective if the fact that it absolves and it does not undervalue is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it absolves and does not undervalue is incorrect it is not subjective hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Marshall is both a hyponatremia and not subjective is not correct then the fact that the fact that it surpasses is not wrong is not right. sent2: if something absolves and does not undervalue it is not subjective. sent3: if that something absolves and does undervalue is not right it is not subjective. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is pentecostal and is not an ala is not right it is a Vaseline. sent5: if the fact that the Marshall is a Bern but it does not undervalue is wrong it does not farm intrusion. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not absolve then it is not subjective. sent7: something is not subjective if it does not absolve. sent8: something is subjective if that it does absolve and does not undervalue does not hold. sent9: the Marshall is not subjective if the fact that it absolves and it undervalues is incorrect. sent10: if the sweetheart knots Lafayette and does not absolve it is not endothermic. sent11: the Marshall is subjective if that it does absolve and it does not undervalue does not hold. sent12: the myelocyte is non-blastomycotic if the fact that it does undervalue and it is a hacker is not correct. sent13: if the garnishee does not shift it does not undervalue. sent14: if something is baric but not a disgusting it is not a kind of a forehand. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it does absolve and it does not undervalue is wrong then it is subjective. sent16: there exists something such that if it does absolve and does not undervalue then it is not subjective. sent17: if the Marshall knots garnishee but it is not subjective then it does not seize. sent18: if that something does absolve and does not undervalue is incorrect then it is non-subjective. sent19: there is something such that if that it absolves and it undervalues does not hold then it is not subjective. sent20: the Marshall is not subjective if it does not absolve. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the Marshall is not subjective if the fact that it absolves and it does not undervalue is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__