the inadvisableness happens.
sent1: the empyrealness happens and the immunoassay happens. sent2: the apostasy does not occur. sent3: that the uniforming occurs is brought about by that the flicking Dunkirk occurs. sent4: the fact that the landlessness and the empyrealness happens does not hold if the misdirecting does not occur. sent5: the inquisition happens. sent6: the flicking yearbook does not occur. sent7: if both the landlessness and the ignoring Antilocapridae occurs that the empyrealness does not occur hold. sent8: that the inquisition happens causes the ignoring Antilocapridae. sent9: if the coccalness happens but the immunoassay does not occur the misdirecting does not occur. sent10: the pyrotechnicness does not occur. sent11: the groom happens. sent12: if that the ignoring Antilocapridae does not occur but the inquisition occurs is not correct the coccalness occurs. sent13: the varnishing exhibitionism happens. sent14: the misdirecting and the inadvisableness occurs if the landlessness does not occur. sent15: the efficaciousness occurs. sent16: that the immunoassay occurs hold. sent17: that the clamp does not occur yields that both the frail and the holographicness happens. sent18: the misdirecting occurs. sent19: the sales happens. sent20: if the landlessness does not occur then the misdirecting occurs.
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the ignoring Antilocapridae happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the landlessness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the landlessness happens and the ignoring Antilocapridae occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the empyrealness does not occur.; sent1 -> int4: the empyrealness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the landlessness does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the misdirecting and the inadvisableness occurs.; int7 -> hypothesis;
both the coccalness and the fandango occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the inadvisableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the empyrealness happens and the immunoassay happens. sent2: the apostasy does not occur. sent3: that the uniforming occurs is brought about by that the flicking Dunkirk occurs. sent4: the fact that the landlessness and the empyrealness happens does not hold if the misdirecting does not occur. sent5: the inquisition happens. sent6: the flicking yearbook does not occur. sent7: if both the landlessness and the ignoring Antilocapridae occurs that the empyrealness does not occur hold. sent8: that the inquisition happens causes the ignoring Antilocapridae. sent9: if the coccalness happens but the immunoassay does not occur the misdirecting does not occur. sent10: the pyrotechnicness does not occur. sent11: the groom happens. sent12: if that the ignoring Antilocapridae does not occur but the inquisition occurs is not correct the coccalness occurs. sent13: the varnishing exhibitionism happens. sent14: the misdirecting and the inadvisableness occurs if the landlessness does not occur. sent15: the efficaciousness occurs. sent16: that the immunoassay occurs hold. sent17: that the clamp does not occur yields that both the frail and the holographicness happens. sent18: the misdirecting occurs. sent19: the sales happens. sent20: if the landlessness does not occur then the misdirecting occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the ignoring Antilocapridae happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the landlessness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the landlessness happens and the ignoring Antilocapridae occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the empyrealness does not occur.; sent1 -> int4: the empyrealness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the landlessness does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the misdirecting and the inadvisableness occurs.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__