the fact that the part does not exacerbate Gracilariidae but it exacerbates dispensary is incorrect.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a whisk is not true that the apodeme does not exacerbate over and is a kind of a jellaba is not right. sent2: the phosphine does drain kiwi if the fact that the apodeme does not drain tarnish and it is not a kind of a jellaba does not hold. sent3: the part does not exacerbate Gracilariidae and exacerbates dispensary if the apodeme does exacerbate over. sent4: the apodeme is not a jellaba and/or does not whisk. sent5: the apodeme is pacific if it does not drain tarnish and is not a jellaba. sent6: there exists something such that that it does not exacerbate dispensary and is not a whisk is false. sent7: if the apodeme does not drain tarnish but it is a jellaba it is pacific. sent8: that the apodeme does drain tarnish and is not a jellaba is not correct. sent9: the fact that the part does not exacerbate Gracilariidae but it exacerbates dispensary does not hold if there exists something such that it drains kiwi. sent10: the phosphine does exacerbate Gracilariidae. sent11: the fact that the fact that something does drain kiwi or is not pacific or both is not wrong is not true if it does not exacerbate Gracilariidae. sent12: the part is not a kind of a guar and does not exacerbate Gracilariidae. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a English hold. sent14: something that does not exacerbate over and/or does not whisk does not exacerbate over. sent15: the phosphine does not exacerbate over. sent16: the fact that the part exacerbates Gracilariidae and it does exacerbate dispensary is not right. sent17: the dispensary exacerbates over if the apodeme is pacific. sent18: that the apodeme does not drain tarnish and is a jellaba is false. sent19: the dispensary does exacerbate dispensary if the part is a whisk. sent20: if there exists something such that it is non-English the dispensary does not exacerbate over or it is not a whisk or both. sent21: the dispensary does exacerbate over or it is not a kind of a whisk or both if there exists something such that it is not English. sent22: the apodeme is pacific if it does drain tarnish and is not a kind of a jellaba. sent23: the dispensary does exacerbate over and/or is not a whisk. sent24: that the part does exacerbate Gracilariidae and it does exacerbate dispensary is wrong if something does drain kiwi. sent25: the apodeme is a whisk if the dispensary is a whisk. sent26: if something is not pacific and drains kiwi then that it does exacerbate over is not incorrect. sent27: there is something such that it is a English.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apodeme does not drain tarnish and it is not a kind of a jellaba.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the apodeme is pacific.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the dispensary exacerbates over.; sent14 -> int3: if the dispensary does not exacerbate over and/or is not a whisk the fact that it does not exacerbate over is not false.; sent13 & sent20 -> int4: either the dispensary does not exacerbate over or it does not whisk or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the dispensary does not exacerbate over.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the apodeme does not drain tarnish and is not a jellaba is not correct.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the phosphine drains kiwi.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it drains kiwi.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the breakable does not exacerbate over.
sent11 -> int10: the fact that the apodeme drains kiwi and/or it is not pacific is false if it does not exacerbate Gracilariidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the part does not exacerbate Gracilariidae but it exacerbates dispensary is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a whisk is not true that the apodeme does not exacerbate over and is a kind of a jellaba is not right. sent2: the phosphine does drain kiwi if the fact that the apodeme does not drain tarnish and it is not a kind of a jellaba does not hold. sent3: the part does not exacerbate Gracilariidae and exacerbates dispensary if the apodeme does exacerbate over. sent4: the apodeme is not a jellaba and/or does not whisk. sent5: the apodeme is pacific if it does not drain tarnish and is not a jellaba. sent6: there exists something such that that it does not exacerbate dispensary and is not a whisk is false. sent7: if the apodeme does not drain tarnish but it is a jellaba it is pacific. sent8: that the apodeme does drain tarnish and is not a jellaba is not correct. sent9: the fact that the part does not exacerbate Gracilariidae but it exacerbates dispensary does not hold if there exists something such that it drains kiwi. sent10: the phosphine does exacerbate Gracilariidae. sent11: the fact that the fact that something does drain kiwi or is not pacific or both is not wrong is not true if it does not exacerbate Gracilariidae. sent12: the part is not a kind of a guar and does not exacerbate Gracilariidae. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a English hold. sent14: something that does not exacerbate over and/or does not whisk does not exacerbate over. sent15: the phosphine does not exacerbate over. sent16: the fact that the part exacerbates Gracilariidae and it does exacerbate dispensary is not right. sent17: the dispensary exacerbates over if the apodeme is pacific. sent18: that the apodeme does not drain tarnish and is a jellaba is false. sent19: the dispensary does exacerbate dispensary if the part is a whisk. sent20: if there exists something such that it is non-English the dispensary does not exacerbate over or it is not a whisk or both. sent21: the dispensary does exacerbate over or it is not a kind of a whisk or both if there exists something such that it is not English. sent22: the apodeme is pacific if it does drain tarnish and is not a kind of a jellaba. sent23: the dispensary does exacerbate over and/or is not a whisk. sent24: that the part does exacerbate Gracilariidae and it does exacerbate dispensary is wrong if something does drain kiwi. sent25: the apodeme is a whisk if the dispensary is a whisk. sent26: if something is not pacific and drains kiwi then that it does exacerbate over is not incorrect. sent27: there is something such that it is a English. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apodeme does not drain tarnish and it is not a kind of a jellaba.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the apodeme is pacific.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the dispensary exacerbates over.; sent14 -> int3: if the dispensary does not exacerbate over and/or is not a whisk the fact that it does not exacerbate over is not false.; sent13 & sent20 -> int4: either the dispensary does not exacerbate over or it does not whisk or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the dispensary does not exacerbate over.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the apodeme does not drain tarnish and is not a jellaba is not correct.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the phosphine drains kiwi.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it drains kiwi.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__