the fact that the webbing is not a blackwater and/or is not obstetrics is not correct.
sent1: if the peafowl is bionics or it is lactic or both that the peneplain does not ding rangpur is right. sent2: the fact that something is either not a blackwater or not obstetrics or both if it is bionics hold. sent3: there is something such that it does not outgeneral glasnost. sent4: something is not a hypothalamus if it does not harness. sent5: something is not a dryopithecine if that it is a jiggered and it is a kind of a dryopithecine is incorrect. sent6: that something is a yellowcake and does not headquarter insurance is not right if it is not a dryopithecine. sent7: something is lactic. sent8: something is not a harness if the fact that it is a kind of a yellowcake and does not headquarter insurance is not correct. sent9: if there exists something such that that it does not outgeneral glasnost is right the peneplain does ding rangpur. sent10: if the peneplain is not lactic then the fact that the peafowl does not unfasten but it is bionics hold. sent11: something does not ding rangpur but it is lactic if it does outgeneral glasnost. sent12: if the webbing does ding rangpur and is lactic then the fact that the peneplain is not lactic is correct. sent13: if something is not lactic the webbing is obstetrics. sent14: the peneplain does not ding rangpur if the peafowl is bionics. sent15: the webbing is bionics if the peafowl is bionics. sent16: the Gaul is eosinophilic if the pyxie is Goethean. sent17: if the peneplain is bionics the peafowl is bionics. sent18: something is Goethean and it is a kind of a spell-checker if it is not a hypothalamus. sent19: there is nothing that is a jiggered and is a dryopithecine. sent20: that the webbing is not obstetrics is not correct. sent21: if the Gaul is eosinophilic then the skidpan does outgeneral glasnost.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peafowl is lactic.; assump1 -> int1: the peafowl is bionics and/or it is lactic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the peneplain does not ding rangpur.; sent3 & sent9 -> int3: the peneplain does ding rangpur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the peafowl is not lactic.; int5 -> int6: something is non-lactic.;
there exists something such that it does not unfasten.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the webbing is not a blackwater and/or is not obstetrics is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the peafowl is bionics or it is lactic or both that the peneplain does not ding rangpur is right. sent2: the fact that something is either not a blackwater or not obstetrics or both if it is bionics hold. sent3: there is something such that it does not outgeneral glasnost. sent4: something is not a hypothalamus if it does not harness. sent5: something is not a dryopithecine if that it is a jiggered and it is a kind of a dryopithecine is incorrect. sent6: that something is a yellowcake and does not headquarter insurance is not right if it is not a dryopithecine. sent7: something is lactic. sent8: something is not a harness if the fact that it is a kind of a yellowcake and does not headquarter insurance is not correct. sent9: if there exists something such that that it does not outgeneral glasnost is right the peneplain does ding rangpur. sent10: if the peneplain is not lactic then the fact that the peafowl does not unfasten but it is bionics hold. sent11: something does not ding rangpur but it is lactic if it does outgeneral glasnost. sent12: if the webbing does ding rangpur and is lactic then the fact that the peneplain is not lactic is correct. sent13: if something is not lactic the webbing is obstetrics. sent14: the peneplain does not ding rangpur if the peafowl is bionics. sent15: the webbing is bionics if the peafowl is bionics. sent16: the Gaul is eosinophilic if the pyxie is Goethean. sent17: if the peneplain is bionics the peafowl is bionics. sent18: something is Goethean and it is a kind of a spell-checker if it is not a hypothalamus. sent19: there is nothing that is a jiggered and is a dryopithecine. sent20: that the webbing is not obstetrics is not correct. sent21: if the Gaul is eosinophilic then the skidpan does outgeneral glasnost. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peafowl is lactic.; assump1 -> int1: the peafowl is bionics and/or it is lactic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the peneplain does not ding rangpur.; sent3 & sent9 -> int3: the peneplain does ding rangpur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the peafowl is not lactic.; int5 -> int6: something is non-lactic.; __UNKNOWN__