the narco-state is behavioristic.
sent1: if the fact that the yoke is not behavioristic is not incorrect the narco-state is not behavioristic. sent2: the fetter is not a kind of a Helipterum. sent3: that the yoke honeys is not incorrect. sent4: that the fetter redecorates one-quintillionth hold. sent5: if the narco-state does not tincture marc then it is behavioristic. sent6: the yoke is a honey if the fetter redecorates locative. sent7: the narco-state is a honey. sent8: the fact that the reticulation redecorates locative and it is behavioristic is wrong if the transmitter does not tincture marc. sent9: something redecorates one-quintillionth and it is a kind of a Helipterum if it does not redecorate locative. sent10: the yoke honeys and does not redecorate locative if the fetter redecorate locative. sent11: something does redecorate one-quintillionth if it does not redecorate locative. sent12: if the fetter does not redecorate locative then that it does redecorate one-quintillionth is right.
sent9 -> int1: the fetter redecorates one-quintillionth and it is a Helipterum if the fact that it does redecorate locative does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fetter does not redecorate locative.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fetter redecorates one-quintillionth and it is a Helipterum.; int2 -> int3: the fetter is a Helipterum.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fetter redecorates locative.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the yoke does honey but it does not redecorate locative.;
the narco-state is not behavioristic.
$hypothesis$ = the narco-state is behavioristic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the yoke is not behavioristic is not incorrect the narco-state is not behavioristic. sent2: the fetter is not a kind of a Helipterum. sent3: that the yoke honeys is not incorrect. sent4: that the fetter redecorates one-quintillionth hold. sent5: if the narco-state does not tincture marc then it is behavioristic. sent6: the yoke is a honey if the fetter redecorates locative. sent7: the narco-state is a honey. sent8: the fact that the reticulation redecorates locative and it is behavioristic is wrong if the transmitter does not tincture marc. sent9: something redecorates one-quintillionth and it is a kind of a Helipterum if it does not redecorate locative. sent10: the yoke honeys and does not redecorate locative if the fetter redecorate locative. sent11: something does redecorate one-quintillionth if it does not redecorate locative. sent12: if the fetter does not redecorate locative then that it does redecorate one-quintillionth is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the fetter redecorates one-quintillionth and it is a Helipterum if the fact that it does redecorate locative does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fetter does not redecorate locative.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fetter redecorates one-quintillionth and it is a Helipterum.; int2 -> int3: the fetter is a Helipterum.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fetter redecorates locative.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the yoke does honey but it does not redecorate locative.; __UNKNOWN__