the hemoprotein is not extrusive.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a netball the fact that it does not mesh plum and it does design antistrophe is not true. sent2: there are polarographic things. sent3: if the microorganism is a Buphthalmum the prospect whiffs Thule. sent4: that if the prospect is not a kind of a bit the servant is a Buphthalmum that whiffs Thule is not incorrect. sent5: if the hiker is penetrable then the striatum does whiff Nazareth and/or it is not black-and-white. sent6: the hemoprotein is a Buphthalmum. sent7: if something that is not black-and-white is not smokeless the peasant monetizes Tyson. sent8: the hiker is both non-black-and-white and non-smokeless if there exists something such that it is not penetrable. sent9: the prospect does whiff Thule if the microorganism does whiff Thule. sent10: if something does not monetize Tyson the fact that it is smokeless and it does not monetize devil does not hold. sent11: if the peasant monetizes Tyson then the servant does monetize devil. sent12: if there is something such that it is not extrusive then the fact that the hemoprotein does not mesh footman and is a kind of a netball is not correct. sent13: if something is polarographic the prospect is not a bit. sent14: if the servant does monetize Tyson then that the fact that the peasant does not monetize devil and it is not smokeless is not false is false. sent15: if the servant does not design antistrophe it monetizes Tyson and does mesh plum. sent16: if the servant does monetize devil but it does not mesh plum then the focus does not design antistrophe. sent17: the peasant is smokeless if that the servant is smokeless and does not monetize devil is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that the peasant does not monetize devil and is not smokeless is wrong then the hiker is not smokeless. sent19: if there is something such that that it does not mesh footman and it is a netball is false the focus is not a kind of a netball. sent20: the microorganism does whiff Thule or is a Buphthalmum or both. sent21: something does not mesh plum if it is a Buphthalmum and does whiff Thule. sent22: the hiker is penetrable if the peasant is penetrable. sent23: the prospect is not extrusive if it does whiff Thule. sent24: something that does not design antistrophe either is a netball or does not mesh footman or both. sent25: if the focus is a netball and/or it does not mesh footman the hemoprotein is not extrusive. sent26: there is something such that it is not penetrable. sent27: something is penetrable if it is smokeless.
sent26 & sent8 -> int1: the hiker is both not black-and-white and not smokeless.; int1 -> int2: something is not black-and-white and is not smokeless.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the peasant monetizes Tyson.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: that the servant monetizes devil is not incorrect.; sent21 -> int5: if the servant is a Buphthalmum and it whiffs Thule it does not mesh plum.; sent2 & sent13 -> int6: the prospect is not a bit.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the servant is a Buphthalmum and it whiffs Thule.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the servant does not mesh plum.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the servant does monetize devil but it does not mesh plum.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the focus does not design antistrophe.; sent24 -> int11: if the focus does not design antistrophe then either it is a kind of a netball or it does not mesh footman or both.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the focus is a netball or does not mesh footman or both.; int12 & sent25 -> hypothesis;
the hemoprotein is extrusive.
$hypothesis$ = the hemoprotein is not extrusive. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a netball the fact that it does not mesh plum and it does design antistrophe is not true. sent2: there are polarographic things. sent3: if the microorganism is a Buphthalmum the prospect whiffs Thule. sent4: that if the prospect is not a kind of a bit the servant is a Buphthalmum that whiffs Thule is not incorrect. sent5: if the hiker is penetrable then the striatum does whiff Nazareth and/or it is not black-and-white. sent6: the hemoprotein is a Buphthalmum. sent7: if something that is not black-and-white is not smokeless the peasant monetizes Tyson. sent8: the hiker is both non-black-and-white and non-smokeless if there exists something such that it is not penetrable. sent9: the prospect does whiff Thule if the microorganism does whiff Thule. sent10: if something does not monetize Tyson the fact that it is smokeless and it does not monetize devil does not hold. sent11: if the peasant monetizes Tyson then the servant does monetize devil. sent12: if there is something such that it is not extrusive then the fact that the hemoprotein does not mesh footman and is a kind of a netball is not correct. sent13: if something is polarographic the prospect is not a bit. sent14: if the servant does monetize Tyson then that the fact that the peasant does not monetize devil and it is not smokeless is not false is false. sent15: if the servant does not design antistrophe it monetizes Tyson and does mesh plum. sent16: if the servant does monetize devil but it does not mesh plum then the focus does not design antistrophe. sent17: the peasant is smokeless if that the servant is smokeless and does not monetize devil is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that the peasant does not monetize devil and is not smokeless is wrong then the hiker is not smokeless. sent19: if there is something such that that it does not mesh footman and it is a netball is false the focus is not a kind of a netball. sent20: the microorganism does whiff Thule or is a Buphthalmum or both. sent21: something does not mesh plum if it is a Buphthalmum and does whiff Thule. sent22: the hiker is penetrable if the peasant is penetrable. sent23: the prospect is not extrusive if it does whiff Thule. sent24: something that does not design antistrophe either is a netball or does not mesh footman or both. sent25: if the focus is a netball and/or it does not mesh footman the hemoprotein is not extrusive. sent26: there is something such that it is not penetrable. sent27: something is penetrable if it is smokeless. ; $proof$ = 
sent26 & sent8 -> int1: the hiker is both not black-and-white and not smokeless.; int1 -> int2: something is not black-and-white and is not smokeless.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the peasant monetizes Tyson.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: that the servant monetizes devil is not incorrect.; sent21 -> int5: if the servant is a Buphthalmum and it whiffs Thule it does not mesh plum.; sent2 & sent13 -> int6: the prospect is not a bit.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the servant is a Buphthalmum and it whiffs Thule.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the servant does not mesh plum.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the servant does monetize devil but it does not mesh plum.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the focus does not design antistrophe.; sent24 -> int11: if the focus does not design antistrophe then either it is a kind of a netball or it does not mesh footman or both.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the focus is a netball or does not mesh footman or both.; int12 & sent25 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__