that either the lap does syllogize Alsobia or it articulates Gavialidae or both is wrong.
sent1: if the lap does not articulate dimensioning then it does not articulate Gavialidae. sent2: something does not gnaw and does not articulate dimensioning if the fact that it is not reverent is right. sent3: that the lap either syllogizes Alsobia or articulates Gavialidae or both is not true if it does not articulate dimensioning. sent4: the depression is not metatarsal and is not obligate. sent5: the fact that something is a metatarsal but it is not reverent does not hold if the fact that it does gnaw is not wrong. sent6: that the lap is not reverent is true if the ingredient syllogizes predictor. sent7: the ingredient is metatarsal. sent8: if something does articulate dimensioning then it does gnaw. sent9: something does syllogize Alsobia if it syllogizes predictor. sent10: the lap does not articulate Gavialidae. sent11: the ingredient does articulate dimensioning.
sent7 -> int1: the ingredient does syllogize predictor and/or it is a metatarsal.; sent2 -> int2: the lap does not gnaw and it does not articulate dimensioning if it is not reverent.;
the lap syllogizes Alsobia and/or articulates Gavialidae.
sent9 -> int3: if the lap does syllogize predictor it does syllogize Alsobia.; sent5 -> int4: if the ingredient does gnaw then the fact that it is metatarsal thing that is not reverent is wrong.; sent8 -> int5: the ingredient gnaws if it does articulate dimensioning.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the ingredient does gnaw.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the ingredient is metatarsal thing that is not reverent does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is a metatarsal that is not reverent is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that either the lap does syllogize Alsobia or it articulates Gavialidae or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lap does not articulate dimensioning then it does not articulate Gavialidae. sent2: something does not gnaw and does not articulate dimensioning if the fact that it is not reverent is right. sent3: that the lap either syllogizes Alsobia or articulates Gavialidae or both is not true if it does not articulate dimensioning. sent4: the depression is not metatarsal and is not obligate. sent5: the fact that something is a metatarsal but it is not reverent does not hold if the fact that it does gnaw is not wrong. sent6: that the lap is not reverent is true if the ingredient syllogizes predictor. sent7: the ingredient is metatarsal. sent8: if something does articulate dimensioning then it does gnaw. sent9: something does syllogize Alsobia if it syllogizes predictor. sent10: the lap does not articulate Gavialidae. sent11: the ingredient does articulate dimensioning. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the ingredient does syllogize predictor and/or it is a metatarsal.; sent2 -> int2: the lap does not gnaw and it does not articulate dimensioning if it is not reverent.; __UNKNOWN__