if the photometry does not occur then the fact that the handling does not occur and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur is not right.
sent1: if the fact that both the non-fascistness and the transubstantiating happens is incorrect the photometry occurs. sent2: that the decortication occurs is prevented by that the handling does not occur and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur. sent3: that the handling happens and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur is not right if the photometry does not occur. sent4: if the decortication does not occur then that the non-fascistness and the transubstantiating occurs does not hold. sent5: if the photometry does not occur that not the handling but the reassailing Ixodidae happens is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handling does not occur and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the decortication does not occur.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that not the fascist but the transubstantiating happens is wrong.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the photometry occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the photometry does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the handling does not occur and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur does not hold.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the photometry does not occur then the fact that the handling does not occur and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that both the non-fascistness and the transubstantiating happens is incorrect the photometry occurs. sent2: that the decortication occurs is prevented by that the handling does not occur and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur. sent3: that the handling happens and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur is not right if the photometry does not occur. sent4: if the decortication does not occur then that the non-fascistness and the transubstantiating occurs does not hold. sent5: if the photometry does not occur that not the handling but the reassailing Ixodidae happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handling does not occur and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the decortication does not occur.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that not the fascist but the transubstantiating happens is wrong.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the photometry occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the photometry does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the handling does not occur and the reassailing Ixodidae does not occur does not hold.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__