the non-salientness and the countermine happens.
sent1: that the imposition does not occur prevents the non-black-and-whiteness. sent2: the agrologicness does not occur. sent3: the non-agrologicness yields that the grassfire does not occur. sent4: if the multivalentness does not occur then the disembarrassment does not occur. sent5: not the nonfeasance but the fumigation occurs. sent6: if the decorating string happens then that the imposition but not the intruding occurs is not right. sent7: that the hypsometry happens is correct. sent8: if the black-and-whiteness occurs then that the intruding does not occur and the decorating string does not occur is wrong. sent9: if that the black-and-whiteness does not occur hold then the fact that the imposition does not occur and the salient does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the grassfire occurs and/or the slating does not occur is not right if the agrologicness does not occur. sent11: that the imposition does not occur leads to that both the non-salientness and the black-and-whiteness occurs. sent12: the decorating string happens. sent13: the countermine occurs. sent14: if the agrologicness happens that not the salient but the countermine happens is not correct. sent15: that either the Death happens or the trash does not occur or both is wrong. sent16: the fact that the grassfire does not occur is correct.
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that either the grassfire happens or the slating does not occur or both does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the imposition occurs.; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: that that the imposition occurs and the intruding does not occur is false is true.;
the fact that the salientness does not occur but the countermine happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the non-salientness and the countermine happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the imposition does not occur prevents the non-black-and-whiteness. sent2: the agrologicness does not occur. sent3: the non-agrologicness yields that the grassfire does not occur. sent4: if the multivalentness does not occur then the disembarrassment does not occur. sent5: not the nonfeasance but the fumigation occurs. sent6: if the decorating string happens then that the imposition but not the intruding occurs is not right. sent7: that the hypsometry happens is correct. sent8: if the black-and-whiteness occurs then that the intruding does not occur and the decorating string does not occur is wrong. sent9: if that the black-and-whiteness does not occur hold then the fact that the imposition does not occur and the salient does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the grassfire occurs and/or the slating does not occur is not right if the agrologicness does not occur. sent11: that the imposition does not occur leads to that both the non-salientness and the black-and-whiteness occurs. sent12: the decorating string happens. sent13: the countermine occurs. sent14: if the agrologicness happens that not the salient but the countermine happens is not correct. sent15: that either the Death happens or the trash does not occur or both is wrong. sent16: the fact that the grassfire does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that either the grassfire happens or the slating does not occur or both does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the imposition occurs.; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: that that the imposition occurs and the intruding does not occur is false is true.; __UNKNOWN__