the fact that that something hee-haws is not false is not right.
sent1: if the fact that the char is immutable but not a hee-haw is not true then it is not fishy. sent2: the fact that the char is not fishy and it is non-major is false. sent3: there exists something such that that it does romp and it is mutable is not right. sent4: the char is not a kind of a hearthrug if it is fishy. sent5: that the char is fishy thing that is not a kind of a major is incorrect. sent6: that the char is non-major thing that is not a kind of a laryngospasm is wrong. sent7: that something does not romp but it is mutable does not hold if it is not a hearthrug. sent8: the fact that the negotiatress does not romp and does hee-haw is not correct. sent9: if the char is not a hearthrug that it does romp and it is mutable is wrong. sent10: the negotiatress is a kind of a major. sent11: the negotiatress is a kind of a ex-spouse. sent12: the char is not a hearthrug if the fact that it is non-fishy thing that does not major is incorrect. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it does romp hold the negotiatress is a kind of a hee-haw. sent14: the fact that the negotiatress does not verbify cypress but it is not non-major does not hold. sent15: something does not romp and is mutable. sent16: the fact that the char romps and verbifies bully is not right. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it is not mutable and it is fishy is incorrect. sent18: the negotiatress does hee-haw if there exists something such that that it does not romp and it is mutable is wrong. sent19: the fact that something does romp and is mutable is not true if that it is not a hearthrug is true.
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the char is not a kind of a hearthrug is not wrong then the fact that it does not romp and it is mutable is not right.; sent12 & sent2 -> int2: the char is not a hearthrug.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the char does not romp but it is mutable is not right is right.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does not romp and is mutable is not right.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the negotiatress is a hee-haw.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that something hee-haws is not false is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the char is immutable but not a hee-haw is not true then it is not fishy. sent2: the fact that the char is not fishy and it is non-major is false. sent3: there exists something such that that it does romp and it is mutable is not right. sent4: the char is not a kind of a hearthrug if it is fishy. sent5: that the char is fishy thing that is not a kind of a major is incorrect. sent6: that the char is non-major thing that is not a kind of a laryngospasm is wrong. sent7: that something does not romp but it is mutable does not hold if it is not a hearthrug. sent8: the fact that the negotiatress does not romp and does hee-haw is not correct. sent9: if the char is not a hearthrug that it does romp and it is mutable is wrong. sent10: the negotiatress is a kind of a major. sent11: the negotiatress is a kind of a ex-spouse. sent12: the char is not a hearthrug if the fact that it is non-fishy thing that does not major is incorrect. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it does romp hold the negotiatress is a kind of a hee-haw. sent14: the fact that the negotiatress does not verbify cypress but it is not non-major does not hold. sent15: something does not romp and is mutable. sent16: the fact that the char romps and verbifies bully is not right. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it is not mutable and it is fishy is incorrect. sent18: the negotiatress does hee-haw if there exists something such that that it does not romp and it is mutable is wrong. sent19: the fact that something does romp and is mutable is not true if that it is not a hearthrug is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the char is not a kind of a hearthrug is not wrong then the fact that it does not romp and it is mutable is not right.; sent12 & sent2 -> int2: the char is not a hearthrug.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the char does not romp but it is mutable is not right is right.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does not romp and is mutable is not right.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the negotiatress is a hee-haw.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__