the genipap is not a junket.
sent1: the rhubarb is not a XYY if that the reveler is a detonation is true. sent2: if the fact that the dibucaine is a dermatology but it is not acidimetric is not right the fact that the munition is acidimetric is correct. sent3: if the combustion thinks pagan it is dysphoric. sent4: the dasyurid does not post papacy and is not a kind of a ashram if the munition is conventional. sent5: something is conventional if it is acidimetric. sent6: if the fact that something reposes and does not frighten simulacrum is incorrect that it is not intelligible hold. sent7: that the fireball is a repose but it does not frighten simulacrum does not hold. sent8: if that the fireball is a XYY and it is a gradual is false that the genipap is not a junket is true. sent9: something is a gradual and it is a kind of a junket if it is not intelligible. sent10: the combustion thinks pagan. sent11: if the genipap is not a kind of a gradual that the fireball is not a XYY is correct. sent12: the rhubarb is not a kind of a XYY if the fact that the reveler is a junket is not wrong. sent13: if something does not frighten hiccup then it is either a junket or a detonation or both. sent14: the cleavers is not unintelligible and is a gradual if the rhubarb is not a XYY. sent15: something that is dysphoric is a dogmatist. sent16: if that the genipap is a kind of intelligible thing that is a repose is wrong the fireball is not a junket. sent17: if there is something such that it is a gradual the genipap does not frighten simulacrum. sent18: the reveler does not frighten hiccup if something does not frighten hiccup or it is not epileptic or both. sent19: the fact that the genipap is intelligible and it does frighten simulacrum is incorrect if it is not a junket. sent20: if there is something such that it is a kind of a dogmatist the fact that the dibucaine is both a dermatology and non-acidimetric does not hold. sent21: if something does not post papacy and it is not a ashram it does not frighten hiccup.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the fireball is not intelligible is not false if that it is a repose and does not frighten simulacrum is not right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fireball is not intelligible.;
the genipap does not frighten simulacrum.
sent13 -> int3: if the reveler does not frighten hiccup it is a junket or is a detonation or both.; sent21 -> int4: the dasyurid does not frighten hiccup if it does not post papacy and it is not a ashram.; sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the munition is acidimetric hold it is conventional.; sent15 -> int6: if the combustion is dysphoric it is a kind of a dogmatist.; sent3 & sent10 -> int7: the combustion is dysphoric.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the combustion is a dogmatist.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is a dogmatist.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the fact that the fact that the dibucaine is a kind of a dermatology but it is not acidimetric is not right is not incorrect.; sent2 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the munition is acidimetric is not incorrect.; int5 & int11 -> int12: the munition is conventional.; sent4 & int12 -> int13: the dasyurid does not post papacy and it is not a ashram.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the dasyurid does not frighten hiccup.; int14 -> int15: the dasyurid either does not frighten hiccup or is not an epileptic or both.; int15 -> int16: something does not frighten hiccup and/or it is not epileptic.; int16 & sent18 -> int17: that the reveler does not frighten hiccup hold.; int3 & int17 -> int18: either the reveler is a junket or it is a kind of a detonation or both.; int18 & sent12 & sent1 -> int19: the rhubarb is not a XYY.; sent14 & int19 -> int20: the cleavers is both intelligible and a gradual.; int20 -> int21: the cleavers is gradual.; int21 -> int22: something is a gradual.; int22 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the genipap is not a junket. ; $context$ = sent1: the rhubarb is not a XYY if that the reveler is a detonation is true. sent2: if the fact that the dibucaine is a dermatology but it is not acidimetric is not right the fact that the munition is acidimetric is correct. sent3: if the combustion thinks pagan it is dysphoric. sent4: the dasyurid does not post papacy and is not a kind of a ashram if the munition is conventional. sent5: something is conventional if it is acidimetric. sent6: if the fact that something reposes and does not frighten simulacrum is incorrect that it is not intelligible hold. sent7: that the fireball is a repose but it does not frighten simulacrum does not hold. sent8: if that the fireball is a XYY and it is a gradual is false that the genipap is not a junket is true. sent9: something is a gradual and it is a kind of a junket if it is not intelligible. sent10: the combustion thinks pagan. sent11: if the genipap is not a kind of a gradual that the fireball is not a XYY is correct. sent12: the rhubarb is not a kind of a XYY if the fact that the reveler is a junket is not wrong. sent13: if something does not frighten hiccup then it is either a junket or a detonation or both. sent14: the cleavers is not unintelligible and is a gradual if the rhubarb is not a XYY. sent15: something that is dysphoric is a dogmatist. sent16: if that the genipap is a kind of intelligible thing that is a repose is wrong the fireball is not a junket. sent17: if there is something such that it is a gradual the genipap does not frighten simulacrum. sent18: the reveler does not frighten hiccup if something does not frighten hiccup or it is not epileptic or both. sent19: the fact that the genipap is intelligible and it does frighten simulacrum is incorrect if it is not a junket. sent20: if there is something such that it is a kind of a dogmatist the fact that the dibucaine is both a dermatology and non-acidimetric does not hold. sent21: if something does not post papacy and it is not a ashram it does not frighten hiccup. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the fireball is not intelligible is not false if that it is a repose and does not frighten simulacrum is not right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fireball is not intelligible.; __UNKNOWN__