the fact that there is something such that if it is a temporal then the fact that it either piddles cyberculture or does not outstare Ningirsu or both is not right is not false.
sent1: if the sumpter is a temporal it does not piddle cyberculture. sent2: a temporal piddles cyberculture and/or does not outstare Ningirsu. sent3: that something either is a kind of a implicitness or is not cyclothymic or both is not true if it is impolite. sent4: there is something such that if it is sentient the fact that it is apopemptic or it is not a kind of a interreflection or both is incorrect. sent5: something does not piddle cyberculture if it is a temporal. sent6: if something is temporal then the fact that either it piddles cyberculture or it outstares Ningirsu or both does not hold. sent7: if the sumpter does piddle bars then the fact that it does piddle cyberculture and/or does not outstare criollo is not right. sent8: the fact that something is a crag and/or it does not transmute is not true if it does mystify Zinnemann. sent9: if something does mystify oystercatcher the fact that it is a geminate and/or is not low-interest is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a temporal it does piddle cyberculture or it does not outstare Ningirsu or both. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a temporal that it does piddle cyberculture or it outstares Ningirsu or both is wrong. sent12: the sumpter does piddle cyberculture and/or it does not outstare Ningirsu if it is a temporal. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of an actuator that it is wholesome or does not outstare criollo or both does not hold. sent14: that the appendicle is a colonic or is non-osseous or both is wrong if it outstares Ningirsu. sent15: there is something such that if it is apocryphal then that it either is a kind of a Acipenseridae or is not brazen or both is not true. sent16: if the sumpter is a temporal then the fact that either it does piddle cyberculture or it does outstare Ningirsu or both is not true. sent17: there exists something such that if it is birefringent that it is Orwellian or is not a Crambe or both is incorrect. sent18: the fact that something is exergonic or is not a bunker or both is incorrect if it is low-interest. sent19: there is something such that if it is a temporal then it does not piddle cyberculture.
there exists something such that if it is low-interest then the fact that it is exergonic and/or is not a bunker is incorrect.
sent18 -> int1: if the sock is low-interest then the fact that it is exergonic or does not bunker or both is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a temporal then the fact that it either piddles cyberculture or does not outstare Ningirsu or both is not right is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sumpter is a temporal it does not piddle cyberculture. sent2: a temporal piddles cyberculture and/or does not outstare Ningirsu. sent3: that something either is a kind of a implicitness or is not cyclothymic or both is not true if it is impolite. sent4: there is something such that if it is sentient the fact that it is apopemptic or it is not a kind of a interreflection or both is incorrect. sent5: something does not piddle cyberculture if it is a temporal. sent6: if something is temporal then the fact that either it piddles cyberculture or it outstares Ningirsu or both does not hold. sent7: if the sumpter does piddle bars then the fact that it does piddle cyberculture and/or does not outstare criollo is not right. sent8: the fact that something is a crag and/or it does not transmute is not true if it does mystify Zinnemann. sent9: if something does mystify oystercatcher the fact that it is a geminate and/or is not low-interest is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a temporal it does piddle cyberculture or it does not outstare Ningirsu or both. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a temporal that it does piddle cyberculture or it outstares Ningirsu or both is wrong. sent12: the sumpter does piddle cyberculture and/or it does not outstare Ningirsu if it is a temporal. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of an actuator that it is wholesome or does not outstare criollo or both does not hold. sent14: that the appendicle is a colonic or is non-osseous or both is wrong if it outstares Ningirsu. sent15: there is something such that if it is apocryphal then that it either is a kind of a Acipenseridae or is not brazen or both is not true. sent16: if the sumpter is a temporal then the fact that either it does piddle cyberculture or it does outstare Ningirsu or both is not true. sent17: there exists something such that if it is birefringent that it is Orwellian or is not a Crambe or both is incorrect. sent18: the fact that something is exergonic or is not a bunker or both is incorrect if it is low-interest. sent19: there is something such that if it is a temporal then it does not piddle cyberculture. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__