the fact that the fretting roundup but not the unenforceableness happens is wrong.
sent1: the reding capuchin happens. sent2: the adhering Medicare occurs if that the uncompassionateness does not occur and the commandership does not occur is false. sent3: if the reding walk-in occurs then the monstrosity does not occur. sent4: that the uncompassionateness does not occur and the commandership does not occur triggers that the reding capuchin does not occur. sent5: the adhering Medicare occurs if the uncompassionateness happens. sent6: if the bronchiolarness does not occur then the monstrosity and the fretting roundup happens. sent7: if the bailment occurs not the catheterization but the thunderclap occurs. sent8: that the reding capuchin happens and the adhering Medicare does not occur is brought about by that the reding walk-in occurs. sent9: the bronchiolarness does not occur if the bronchiolarness does not occur or the census occurs or both. sent10: if that the unenforceableness does not occur and the reding walk-in does not occur is not true the reding walk-in occurs. sent11: if the catheterization does not occur then the non-bronchiolarness and/or the census occurs. sent12: the fact that the uncompassionateness occurs and the commandership does not occur is false. sent13: the uncompassionateness does not occur. sent14: both the fretting roundup and the non-unenforceableness happens if the monstrosity does not occur. sent15: the unenforceableness does not occur. sent16: the unenforceableness does not occur if the monstrosity does not occur. sent17: that the adhering Medicare occurs or that the reding walk-in happens or both causes that the monstrosity does not occur. sent18: if the adhering Medicare does not occur then the fact that that the reding entitlement does not occur and the geriatricsness does not occur hold does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uncompassionateness does not occur and the commandership does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the reding capuchin does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the uncompassionateness does not occur and the commandership does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the adhering Medicare occurs.; int4 -> int5: that either the adhering Medicare happens or the reding walk-in occurs or both is correct.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the monstrosity does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the reding entitlement does not occur and the geriatricsness does not occur is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fretting roundup but not the unenforceableness happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the reding capuchin happens. sent2: the adhering Medicare occurs if that the uncompassionateness does not occur and the commandership does not occur is false. sent3: if the reding walk-in occurs then the monstrosity does not occur. sent4: that the uncompassionateness does not occur and the commandership does not occur triggers that the reding capuchin does not occur. sent5: the adhering Medicare occurs if the uncompassionateness happens. sent6: if the bronchiolarness does not occur then the monstrosity and the fretting roundup happens. sent7: if the bailment occurs not the catheterization but the thunderclap occurs. sent8: that the reding capuchin happens and the adhering Medicare does not occur is brought about by that the reding walk-in occurs. sent9: the bronchiolarness does not occur if the bronchiolarness does not occur or the census occurs or both. sent10: if that the unenforceableness does not occur and the reding walk-in does not occur is not true the reding walk-in occurs. sent11: if the catheterization does not occur then the non-bronchiolarness and/or the census occurs. sent12: the fact that the uncompassionateness occurs and the commandership does not occur is false. sent13: the uncompassionateness does not occur. sent14: both the fretting roundup and the non-unenforceableness happens if the monstrosity does not occur. sent15: the unenforceableness does not occur. sent16: the unenforceableness does not occur if the monstrosity does not occur. sent17: that the adhering Medicare occurs or that the reding walk-in happens or both causes that the monstrosity does not occur. sent18: if the adhering Medicare does not occur then the fact that that the reding entitlement does not occur and the geriatricsness does not occur hold does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uncompassionateness does not occur and the commandership does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the reding capuchin does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the uncompassionateness does not occur and the commandership does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the adhering Medicare occurs.; int4 -> int5: that either the adhering Medicare happens or the reding walk-in occurs or both is correct.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the monstrosity does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__