the fact that the palingenesis is low-resolution and it is a Simpson is wrong.
sent1: the paste-up is impenetrable and it is inner. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a guitarfish the fact that the paparazzo is both not a guitarfish and not a Scutigera does not hold. sent3: something is non-inner thing that is not isotonic if it is not a kind of a reproducer. sent4: the fact that the antipope is a kind of a Simpson but it is not sentential is incorrect if it does not negotiate counterattraction. sent5: the fact that something does not negotiate counterattraction and it is not a kind of a stentor does not hold if it is not inner. sent6: there exists something such that it is a guitarfish. sent7: the palingenesis is a Simpson. sent8: something is a Simpson if it is a kind of a stentor. sent9: something is not a reproducer if the fact that it is not a kind of a guitarfish and it is not a Scutigera is not correct. sent10: the palingenesis does negotiate counterattraction and is sentential. sent11: the palingenesis is freelance and it is a Kursk. sent12: if there is something such that that it is a Simpson but not sentential does not hold the fiber is not a kind of a Simpson. sent13: something is inner if that it is sentential is not wrong. sent14: if something is a kind of a Service then it is low-resolution. sent15: that the palingenesis is not sentential hold if the fiber is a kind of low-resolution thing that is not inner. sent16: if something is inner it is low-resolution. sent17: the antipope is a stentor if that the paparazzo is not a kind of a reproducer and it is not isotonic is incorrect. sent18: the antipope does not negotiate counterattraction if that the paparazzo does not negotiate counterattraction and it is not a stentor is wrong. sent19: the palingenesis negotiates counterattraction.
sent10 -> int1: the palingenesis is sentential.; sent13 -> int2: if the palingenesis is sentential then it is inner.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the palingenesis is inner.; sent16 -> int4: the palingenesis is low-resolution if it is inner.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the palingenesis is low-resolution.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the palingenesis is low-resolution if it is a Service.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the palingenesis is low-resolution and it is a Simpson is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the paste-up is impenetrable and it is inner. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a guitarfish the fact that the paparazzo is both not a guitarfish and not a Scutigera does not hold. sent3: something is non-inner thing that is not isotonic if it is not a kind of a reproducer. sent4: the fact that the antipope is a kind of a Simpson but it is not sentential is incorrect if it does not negotiate counterattraction. sent5: the fact that something does not negotiate counterattraction and it is not a kind of a stentor does not hold if it is not inner. sent6: there exists something such that it is a guitarfish. sent7: the palingenesis is a Simpson. sent8: something is a Simpson if it is a kind of a stentor. sent9: something is not a reproducer if the fact that it is not a kind of a guitarfish and it is not a Scutigera is not correct. sent10: the palingenesis does negotiate counterattraction and is sentential. sent11: the palingenesis is freelance and it is a Kursk. sent12: if there is something such that that it is a Simpson but not sentential does not hold the fiber is not a kind of a Simpson. sent13: something is inner if that it is sentential is not wrong. sent14: if something is a kind of a Service then it is low-resolution. sent15: that the palingenesis is not sentential hold if the fiber is a kind of low-resolution thing that is not inner. sent16: if something is inner it is low-resolution. sent17: the antipope is a stentor if that the paparazzo is not a kind of a reproducer and it is not isotonic is incorrect. sent18: the antipope does not negotiate counterattraction if that the paparazzo does not negotiate counterattraction and it is not a stentor is wrong. sent19: the palingenesis negotiates counterattraction. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the palingenesis is sentential.; sent13 -> int2: if the palingenesis is sentential then it is inner.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the palingenesis is inner.; sent16 -> int4: the palingenesis is low-resolution if it is inner.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the palingenesis is low-resolution.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__