the percolation does not occur.
sent1: the hydrousness occurs. sent2: that the invertebrateness occurs hold. sent3: the redeployment does not occur if the atomization does not occur but the leapfrogging happens. sent4: the governing occurs if that the redeployment does not occur is correct. sent5: that the untuning Lexington occurs is prevented by that both the sclerotomy and the vertebrateness happens. sent6: the vulpineness happens. sent7: that the leapfrogging occurs but the sclerotomy does not occur is not right if the untuning Lexington occurs. sent8: the clinging Numididae happens. sent9: if the fact that the postmenopausalness does not occur and the injury does not occur is not correct the postmenopausalness happens. sent10: the gazing occurs. sent11: the fact that the mealiness happens is true if the fact that the postmenopausalness does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the lottery occurs if the unthinkableness occurs. sent13: the adjusting occurs and/or the clinging cutout happens. sent14: that the governing occurs causes that the percolation happens. sent15: both the similarness and the anchorage happens. sent16: that the ducking does not occur and the adhesion does not occur is wrong. sent17: if the purgatorialness happens the resecting derv does not occur. sent18: that the leapfrogging occurs and the sclerotomy does not occur is not right. sent19: the leapfrog occurs if the fact that the leapfrog does not occur and the sclerotomy does not occur is wrong. sent20: if the untuning Lexington happens the fact that that the leapfrog does not occur and the sclerotomy does not occur does not hold hold. sent21: if the fact that the leapfrogging does not occur but the resecting derv occurs is not right then the purgatorialness does not occur. sent22: both the untuning Lexington and the invertebrateness occurs. sent23: either that the atomization happens or the purgatorialness or both brings about that the resecting derv does not occur. sent24: the non-pudendalness is brought about by that the resecting voile does not occur and the intrinsicness happens. sent25: the copout happens. sent26: the resecting derv is brought about by that the gazing occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the atomization happens.; assump1 -> int1: the atomization and/or the purgatorialness occurs.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the resecting derv does not occur.; sent26 & sent10 -> int3: the resecting derv occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the atomization does not occur.; sent22 -> int6: the untuning Lexington happens.; sent20 & int6 -> int7: that the leapfrog does not occur and the sclerotomy does not occur is not correct.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the leapfrogging occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: not the atomization but the leapfrog happens.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the redeployment does not occur.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the governing happens.; int11 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the percolation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the percolation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the hydrousness occurs. sent2: that the invertebrateness occurs hold. sent3: the redeployment does not occur if the atomization does not occur but the leapfrogging happens. sent4: the governing occurs if that the redeployment does not occur is correct. sent5: that the untuning Lexington occurs is prevented by that both the sclerotomy and the vertebrateness happens. sent6: the vulpineness happens. sent7: that the leapfrogging occurs but the sclerotomy does not occur is not right if the untuning Lexington occurs. sent8: the clinging Numididae happens. sent9: if the fact that the postmenopausalness does not occur and the injury does not occur is not correct the postmenopausalness happens. sent10: the gazing occurs. sent11: the fact that the mealiness happens is true if the fact that the postmenopausalness does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the lottery occurs if the unthinkableness occurs. sent13: the adjusting occurs and/or the clinging cutout happens. sent14: that the governing occurs causes that the percolation happens. sent15: both the similarness and the anchorage happens. sent16: that the ducking does not occur and the adhesion does not occur is wrong. sent17: if the purgatorialness happens the resecting derv does not occur. sent18: that the leapfrogging occurs and the sclerotomy does not occur is not right. sent19: the leapfrog occurs if the fact that the leapfrog does not occur and the sclerotomy does not occur is wrong. sent20: if the untuning Lexington happens the fact that that the leapfrog does not occur and the sclerotomy does not occur does not hold hold. sent21: if the fact that the leapfrogging does not occur but the resecting derv occurs is not right then the purgatorialness does not occur. sent22: both the untuning Lexington and the invertebrateness occurs. sent23: either that the atomization happens or the purgatorialness or both brings about that the resecting derv does not occur. sent24: the non-pudendalness is brought about by that the resecting voile does not occur and the intrinsicness happens. sent25: the copout happens. sent26: the resecting derv is brought about by that the gazing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the atomization happens.; assump1 -> int1: the atomization and/or the purgatorialness occurs.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the resecting derv does not occur.; sent26 & sent10 -> int3: the resecting derv occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the atomization does not occur.; sent22 -> int6: the untuning Lexington happens.; sent20 & int6 -> int7: that the leapfrog does not occur and the sclerotomy does not occur is not correct.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the leapfrogging occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: not the atomization but the leapfrog happens.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the redeployment does not occur.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the governing happens.; int11 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__