the icaco is inappropriate.
sent1: if that the syrup does freeze-dry Marrakesh but it is not an inroad is not true it does not freeze-dry Marrakesh. sent2: there is something such that it does imagine. sent3: that the icaco is not appropriate hold if something is a ride and imagines. sent4: everything does imagine. sent5: there exists something such that it is a canola. sent6: the HAART is a striper and it is a canola if the syrup does not freeze-dry Marrakesh. sent7: if the syrup is an itinerant the icaco is a kind of an itinerant. sent8: the kava does imagine. sent9: the fact that everything does not housekeep stein is correct. sent10: the syrup is an itinerant if there is something such that that it is a wherry and/or is not a kind of a striper does not hold. sent11: the fact that the HAART is not inappropriate and/or does not putter is not right if there exists something such that it is a kind of a canola. sent12: something is a MRI if it is a ride. sent13: something does putter and/or is not a wherry if it is a striper. sent14: if something does not housekeep stein that it does freeze-dry Marrakesh and it is not an inroad is not right. sent15: there exists something such that that it is a wherry and/or is not a striper does not hold. sent16: the fact that the icaco does not imagine and it is not a ride is false if there is something such that it does imagine. sent17: the fact that the Samaritan is not inappropriate and it does not imagine is not right if the HAART is a ride. sent18: everything is avellan and does freeze-dry bathing. sent19: everything is a kind of a ride and it imagines.
sent19 -> int1: the kava rides and it imagines.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a ride and it does imagine.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the icaco is not inappropriate.
sent14 -> int3: if the secularist does not housekeep stein then the fact that it does freeze-dry Marrakesh and it is not an inroad is not correct.; sent9 -> int4: the secularist does not housekeep stein.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the secularist freeze-dries Marrakesh but it is not an inroad is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is nothing such that it freeze-dries Marrakesh and is not an inroad.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the syrup freeze-dries Marrakesh but it is not an inroad does not hold.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the syrup does not freeze-dry Marrakesh.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the HAART is both a striper and a canola.; int9 -> int10: the HAART is a striper.; sent13 -> int11: the HAART is a putter and/or is not a wherry if it is a striper.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the HAART is a putter and/or it is not a wherry.;
$hypothesis$ = the icaco is inappropriate. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the syrup does freeze-dry Marrakesh but it is not an inroad is not true it does not freeze-dry Marrakesh. sent2: there is something such that it does imagine. sent3: that the icaco is not appropriate hold if something is a ride and imagines. sent4: everything does imagine. sent5: there exists something such that it is a canola. sent6: the HAART is a striper and it is a canola if the syrup does not freeze-dry Marrakesh. sent7: if the syrup is an itinerant the icaco is a kind of an itinerant. sent8: the kava does imagine. sent9: the fact that everything does not housekeep stein is correct. sent10: the syrup is an itinerant if there is something such that that it is a wherry and/or is not a kind of a striper does not hold. sent11: the fact that the HAART is not inappropriate and/or does not putter is not right if there exists something such that it is a kind of a canola. sent12: something is a MRI if it is a ride. sent13: something does putter and/or is not a wherry if it is a striper. sent14: if something does not housekeep stein that it does freeze-dry Marrakesh and it is not an inroad is not right. sent15: there exists something such that that it is a wherry and/or is not a striper does not hold. sent16: the fact that the icaco does not imagine and it is not a ride is false if there is something such that it does imagine. sent17: the fact that the Samaritan is not inappropriate and it does not imagine is not right if the HAART is a ride. sent18: everything is avellan and does freeze-dry bathing. sent19: everything is a kind of a ride and it imagines. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the kava rides and it imagines.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a ride and it does imagine.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__