that the novel is a Heller and is not mechanistic is false.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a Hesperus and a reprehensibility. sent2: if something is a dynast then the fact that it is not a Cumberland hold. sent3: there exists nothing that is not a drill but a dynast. sent4: something does not hear bedrock if the fact that it is not carnivorous and it is not cheliceral does not hold. sent5: that the novel is not a kind of a drill but it is a dynast does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the desperate is not a kind of a gratefulness and it is not a reprehensibility is false the fact that it does not convoy hold. sent7: something does not trip schnecken if that it is a kind of a Soledad that does not Frenchify self-insurance is wrong. sent8: there is nothing that does not drill and is not a kind of a dynast. sent9: something extends if it is possessive. sent10: something does not mythicize if it is indivisible. sent11: if something does not trip schnecken then the fact that it is a Delphinidae or it is not a kind of a patter or both is incorrect. sent12: the bedrock is not a kind of a Cumberland. sent13: if something is not a kind of a Cumberland it is not mechanistic. sent14: something that is not a Cumberland is a kind of a Heller and is not mechanistic. sent15: something is a kind of a Parasitaxus but it does not trip socket if it is not a hollowness. sent16: if something is a Cumberland the fact that it is both not a descant and not a Heller is incorrect. sent17: if the hibiscus does extend then the novel is a Cumberland. sent18: the fact that something is a Soledad and does not Frenchify self-insurance is not true if it does not fend. sent19: the novel is not a kind of a Cumberland if it is a dynast. sent20: if something is a kind of a Cumberland the fact that it is a Heller that is not mechanistic is not true. sent21: if the fact that something is not a drill and is not a dynast is not right then it is not a Cumberland. sent22: if the fact that something is a Delphinidae or not a patter or both is not true then it is possessive.
sent8 -> int1: that the fact that the novel is not a drill and it is not a kind of a dynast is not wrong is not right.; sent21 -> int2: the novel is not a kind of a Cumberland if that it does not drill and it is not a dynast is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the novel is not a kind of a Cumberland.; sent14 -> int4: if the novel is not a Cumberland then it is a Heller and it is not mechanistic.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the novel is a Heller but it is not mechanistic is wrong.
sent20 -> int5: the fact that the novel is a kind of a Heller that is not mechanistic is not correct if the fact that it is a Cumberland hold.; sent9 -> int6: the fact that if the fact that the hibiscus is possessive is not false then that the hibiscus does extend is not incorrect is true.; sent22 -> int7: if that the hibiscus is a kind of a Delphinidae and/or it is not a kind of a patter is not true it is possessive.; sent11 -> int8: the fact that either the hibiscus is a kind of a Delphinidae or it is not a kind of a patter or both does not hold if it does not trip schnecken.; sent7 -> int9: if that the hibiscus is a Soledad but it does not Frenchify self-insurance does not hold then it does not trip schnecken.; sent18 -> int10: if the hibiscus does not fend that it is a Soledad and does not Frenchify self-insurance is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the novel is a Heller and is not mechanistic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a Hesperus and a reprehensibility. sent2: if something is a dynast then the fact that it is not a Cumberland hold. sent3: there exists nothing that is not a drill but a dynast. sent4: something does not hear bedrock if the fact that it is not carnivorous and it is not cheliceral does not hold. sent5: that the novel is not a kind of a drill but it is a dynast does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the desperate is not a kind of a gratefulness and it is not a reprehensibility is false the fact that it does not convoy hold. sent7: something does not trip schnecken if that it is a kind of a Soledad that does not Frenchify self-insurance is wrong. sent8: there is nothing that does not drill and is not a kind of a dynast. sent9: something extends if it is possessive. sent10: something does not mythicize if it is indivisible. sent11: if something does not trip schnecken then the fact that it is a Delphinidae or it is not a kind of a patter or both is incorrect. sent12: the bedrock is not a kind of a Cumberland. sent13: if something is not a kind of a Cumberland it is not mechanistic. sent14: something that is not a Cumberland is a kind of a Heller and is not mechanistic. sent15: something is a kind of a Parasitaxus but it does not trip socket if it is not a hollowness. sent16: if something is a Cumberland the fact that it is both not a descant and not a Heller is incorrect. sent17: if the hibiscus does extend then the novel is a Cumberland. sent18: the fact that something is a Soledad and does not Frenchify self-insurance is not true if it does not fend. sent19: the novel is not a kind of a Cumberland if it is a dynast. sent20: if something is a kind of a Cumberland the fact that it is a Heller that is not mechanistic is not true. sent21: if the fact that something is not a drill and is not a dynast is not right then it is not a Cumberland. sent22: if the fact that something is a Delphinidae or not a patter or both is not true then it is possessive. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: that the fact that the novel is not a drill and it is not a kind of a dynast is not wrong is not right.; sent21 -> int2: the novel is not a kind of a Cumberland if that it does not drill and it is not a dynast is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the novel is not a kind of a Cumberland.; sent14 -> int4: if the novel is not a Cumberland then it is a Heller and it is not mechanistic.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__