the fact that the haslet is a nyala and/or is not a reckoner does not hold.
sent1: the astrocyte does not nose coupled. sent2: if the haslet is not a reckoner then that the astrocyte is not a kind of a Polyprion is correct. sent3: the haslet is a reckoner. sent4: the haslet does meet astrocyte or it is a Polyprion or both if the astrocyte is not a kind of a carfare. sent5: the astrocyte is a reckoner or it is respectable or both. sent6: the fact that the astrocyte is not a carfare is not wrong if that it is not a kind of a obloquy and is a kind of a roomette is wrong. sent7: either the haslet is a nyala or it is a kind of a reckoner or both. sent8: the astrocyte is unrespectable. sent9: something that is unrespectable is a nyala or not a reckoner or both. sent10: the fact that the astrocyte is not a obloquy and is a kind of a roomette is wrong if the fact that it is maxillomandibular hold. sent11: if the haslet is a nyala or not a reckoner or both the astrocyte is not a Polyprion. sent12: if the haslet is not a kind of a carfare then the fact that it is a kind of a Polyprion that meets astrocyte is incorrect. sent13: something that is a kind of a roomette is not a carfare. sent14: the astrocyte is a kind of a Polyprion if it is unrespectable. sent15: that either the rampion is an ape or it is not unrespectable or both does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the haslet either is a nyala or is not a kind of a reckoner or both.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the astrocyte is not a kind of a Polyprion.; sent14 & sent8 -> int2: the astrocyte is a Polyprion.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the haslet is a nyala and/or is not a reckoner.
sent9 -> int4: if the haslet is unrespectable then it is a kind of a nyala and/or is not a reckoner.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the haslet is a nyala and/or is not a reckoner does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the astrocyte does not nose coupled. sent2: if the haslet is not a reckoner then that the astrocyte is not a kind of a Polyprion is correct. sent3: the haslet is a reckoner. sent4: the haslet does meet astrocyte or it is a Polyprion or both if the astrocyte is not a kind of a carfare. sent5: the astrocyte is a reckoner or it is respectable or both. sent6: the fact that the astrocyte is not a carfare is not wrong if that it is not a kind of a obloquy and is a kind of a roomette is wrong. sent7: either the haslet is a nyala or it is a kind of a reckoner or both. sent8: the astrocyte is unrespectable. sent9: something that is unrespectable is a nyala or not a reckoner or both. sent10: the fact that the astrocyte is not a obloquy and is a kind of a roomette is wrong if the fact that it is maxillomandibular hold. sent11: if the haslet is a nyala or not a reckoner or both the astrocyte is not a Polyprion. sent12: if the haslet is not a kind of a carfare then the fact that it is a kind of a Polyprion that meets astrocyte is incorrect. sent13: something that is a kind of a roomette is not a carfare. sent14: the astrocyte is a kind of a Polyprion if it is unrespectable. sent15: that either the rampion is an ape or it is not unrespectable or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the haslet either is a nyala or is not a kind of a reckoner or both.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the astrocyte is not a kind of a Polyprion.; sent14 & sent8 -> int2: the astrocyte is a Polyprion.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__