the rapeseed is not Iraqi.
sent1: the ladle is not a kind of a nihilism and is a kind of a NSC if it is a profaneness. sent2: the rapeseed is both not a coil and endoparasitic if the sphincter is endoparasitic. sent3: if the ladle is not a nihilism but it is a NSC then the sphincter is endoparasitic. sent4: the ladle is a kind of a profaneness. sent5: if something is not a coil but it is endoparasitic it is Iraqi.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the ladle is not a nihilism and is a NSC.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the sphincter is endoparasitic.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the rapeseed does not coil and is endoparasitic.; sent5 -> int4: if the rapeseed is not a coil and is endoparasitic then that it is a Iraqi is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the rapeseed is not Iraqi. ; $context$ = sent1: the ladle is not a kind of a nihilism and is a kind of a NSC if it is a profaneness. sent2: the rapeseed is both not a coil and endoparasitic if the sphincter is endoparasitic. sent3: if the ladle is not a nihilism but it is a NSC then the sphincter is endoparasitic. sent4: the ladle is a kind of a profaneness. sent5: if something is not a coil but it is endoparasitic it is Iraqi. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the ladle is not a nihilism and is a NSC.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the sphincter is endoparasitic.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the rapeseed does not coil and is endoparasitic.; sent5 -> int4: if the rapeseed is not a coil and is endoparasitic then that it is a Iraqi is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__