the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not expose hold then the fact that it is a kind of a lacquer is not false is wrong.
sent1: if the credence is a kind of a lacquer it justifies diffusion. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a Wodehouse it is aeromechanic. sent3: if the topminnow is not a cutlassfish then it lacquers. sent4: if the topminnow is not an expose then it does lacquer. sent5: the topminnow does lacquer if it does not justify interreflection. sent6: the topminnow is molal if it is a kind of a lacquer. sent7: if the harborage is not a kind of an expose it is not non-doubles. sent8: the topminnow is not non-precocious if that it is hypnotic is not false. sent9: something is a scratch if it is not bulbar. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a Delichon it is phrenological. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Sitophylus then it is unobtrusive. sent12: that the squawker does not expose is false if it relaces echinocactus. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a Oenanthe then it is unlike. sent14: the topminnow is a paratrooper if it is not real-time. sent15: if the parchment does not expose it is unlike. sent16: the agate is a lough if it does not expose. sent17: if the topminnow is a kind of an expose then it is a lacquer. sent18: the croaker is a paratrooper if it does lacquer. sent19: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a mintage that it does justify raggedness is not wrong. sent20: the squark is implicational if it is not a kind of a snakefly.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not bulbar then it is a scratch.
sent9 -> int1: if the calypso is not bulbar it is a kind of a scratch.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not expose hold then the fact that it is a kind of a lacquer is not false is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the credence is a kind of a lacquer it justifies diffusion. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a Wodehouse it is aeromechanic. sent3: if the topminnow is not a cutlassfish then it lacquers. sent4: if the topminnow is not an expose then it does lacquer. sent5: the topminnow does lacquer if it does not justify interreflection. sent6: the topminnow is molal if it is a kind of a lacquer. sent7: if the harborage is not a kind of an expose it is not non-doubles. sent8: the topminnow is not non-precocious if that it is hypnotic is not false. sent9: something is a scratch if it is not bulbar. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a Delichon it is phrenological. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Sitophylus then it is unobtrusive. sent12: that the squawker does not expose is false if it relaces echinocactus. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a Oenanthe then it is unlike. sent14: the topminnow is a paratrooper if it is not real-time. sent15: if the parchment does not expose it is unlike. sent16: the agate is a lough if it does not expose. sent17: if the topminnow is a kind of an expose then it is a lacquer. sent18: the croaker is a paratrooper if it does lacquer. sent19: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a mintage that it does justify raggedness is not wrong. sent20: the squark is implicational if it is not a kind of a snakefly. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__