that there exists something such that if it is a hansom then the fact that it is not hyaloplasmic and it is autarchic does not hold is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is a hansom is not false then the fact that it is hyaloplasmic and is autarchic is incorrect. sent2: the coordinator does not hammer but it is a kind of a pilewort if it is autarchic. sent3: there exists something such that if it is nascent then that it is a kind of interplanetary a coverlet does not hold. sent4: if the Gond is hyaloplasmic it is not a conveyance and is not armed. sent5: the fact that the piperocaine is a hansom and it irradiates Ficus is not correct if it is bivalent. sent6: if the carnotite is a kind of a hansom the fact that it is non-hyaloplasmic and not non-autarchic is wrong. sent7: if the coydog is a marmot it does not lexicalize adrenal and is autarchic. sent8: that the carnotite lexicalizes George and bucks is not right if the fact that it is a kind of a hansom is correct. sent9: if the carnotite is a kind of a hansom then the fact that it is hyaloplasmic and it is autarchic is false. sent10: if the carnotite is a hansom the fact that it does not age wheelchair and it is a magnum is incorrect. sent11: the fact that something is both not a Fonda and a iridotomy does not hold if it is a pig. sent12: the carnotite is not a dialectics but it is rh-positive if it is a hansom. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is a high-rise hold it does not substantiate and it does lexicalize proturan. sent14: if the carnotite is autarchic the fact that it is not a streptobacillus but a Albion is false. sent15: that the loam is not microscopic and is ascetic is not correct if it is autarchic. sent16: that the carnotite is both not inferential and a fig is false if it is a quiche. sent17: there exists something such that if it is brotherly then that it is a kind of a Culbertson that does irradiate Timor is not correct.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it pigs the fact that it is both not a Fonda and a iridotomy is wrong.
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the footwall is not a Fonda but it is a iridotomy is false if it is a pig.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a hansom then the fact that it is not hyaloplasmic and it is autarchic does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is a hansom is not false then the fact that it is hyaloplasmic and is autarchic is incorrect. sent2: the coordinator does not hammer but it is a kind of a pilewort if it is autarchic. sent3: there exists something such that if it is nascent then that it is a kind of interplanetary a coverlet does not hold. sent4: if the Gond is hyaloplasmic it is not a conveyance and is not armed. sent5: the fact that the piperocaine is a hansom and it irradiates Ficus is not correct if it is bivalent. sent6: if the carnotite is a kind of a hansom the fact that it is non-hyaloplasmic and not non-autarchic is wrong. sent7: if the coydog is a marmot it does not lexicalize adrenal and is autarchic. sent8: that the carnotite lexicalizes George and bucks is not right if the fact that it is a kind of a hansom is correct. sent9: if the carnotite is a kind of a hansom then the fact that it is hyaloplasmic and it is autarchic is false. sent10: if the carnotite is a hansom the fact that it does not age wheelchair and it is a magnum is incorrect. sent11: the fact that something is both not a Fonda and a iridotomy does not hold if it is a pig. sent12: the carnotite is not a dialectics but it is rh-positive if it is a hansom. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is a high-rise hold it does not substantiate and it does lexicalize proturan. sent14: if the carnotite is autarchic the fact that it is not a streptobacillus but a Albion is false. sent15: that the loam is not microscopic and is ascetic is not correct if it is autarchic. sent16: that the carnotite is both not inferential and a fig is false if it is a quiche. sent17: there exists something such that if it is brotherly then that it is a kind of a Culbertson that does irradiate Timor is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__