the fact that the sacralness and the blog occurs is wrong.
sent1: the blog occurs if the harmonics occurs. sent2: that the sacralness and the blogging happens does not hold if the working does not occur. sent3: if the devotional does not occur and/or the seconding does not occur the polarness does not occur. sent4: the sacralness happens and the achromatinicness occurs if the second does not occur. sent5: the uttering romper does not occur. sent6: the abasicness does not occur. sent7: the uttering Langmuir does not occur. sent8: that the liveliness does not occur causes that the driedness but not the swelling occurs. sent9: the harmonicsness or the devotional or both happens. sent10: if the fact that the harmonicsness does not occur hold both the devotional and the onsideness happens. sent11: the fact that if the second does not occur that both the non-achromatinicness and the harmonics happens does not hold is not false. sent12: the fact that the gutlessness occurs is true. sent13: the uttering robalo occurs. sent14: either the swelling or the driedness or both happens. sent15: if the Togolese happens and the ecotourism occurs the unveiling Bronte does not occur. sent16: that the working does not occur is brought about by that the monitoring and the non-polarness happens. sent17: the achromatinicness occurs. sent18: the relations does not occur or the uttering homopteran does not occur or both. sent19: if the swell occurs the monitoring happens. sent20: the fact that the working and the monitoring occurs is incorrect if the blogging does not occur. sent21: that the second occurs is prevented by that the monitoring does not occur and the polarness happens. sent22: the harmonicsness happens. sent23: if both the devotional and the harmonics occurs then the achromatinicness does not occur. sent24: that the drying happens prevents that the sacralness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the devotional occurs.; assump1 & sent22 -> int1: the devotional happens and the harmonicsness happens.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: that the achromatinicness does not occur is right.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the devotional does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the devotional does not occur and/or the second does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the polarness does not occur.;
both the sacralness and the blog occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sacralness and the blog occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the blog occurs if the harmonics occurs. sent2: that the sacralness and the blogging happens does not hold if the working does not occur. sent3: if the devotional does not occur and/or the seconding does not occur the polarness does not occur. sent4: the sacralness happens and the achromatinicness occurs if the second does not occur. sent5: the uttering romper does not occur. sent6: the abasicness does not occur. sent7: the uttering Langmuir does not occur. sent8: that the liveliness does not occur causes that the driedness but not the swelling occurs. sent9: the harmonicsness or the devotional or both happens. sent10: if the fact that the harmonicsness does not occur hold both the devotional and the onsideness happens. sent11: the fact that if the second does not occur that both the non-achromatinicness and the harmonics happens does not hold is not false. sent12: the fact that the gutlessness occurs is true. sent13: the uttering robalo occurs. sent14: either the swelling or the driedness or both happens. sent15: if the Togolese happens and the ecotourism occurs the unveiling Bronte does not occur. sent16: that the working does not occur is brought about by that the monitoring and the non-polarness happens. sent17: the achromatinicness occurs. sent18: the relations does not occur or the uttering homopteran does not occur or both. sent19: if the swell occurs the monitoring happens. sent20: the fact that the working and the monitoring occurs is incorrect if the blogging does not occur. sent21: that the second occurs is prevented by that the monitoring does not occur and the polarness happens. sent22: the harmonicsness happens. sent23: if both the devotional and the harmonics occurs then the achromatinicness does not occur. sent24: that the drying happens prevents that the sacralness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the devotional occurs.; assump1 & sent22 -> int1: the devotional happens and the harmonicsness happens.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: that the achromatinicness does not occur is right.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the devotional does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the devotional does not occur and/or the second does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the polarness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__