the blackwash does not grind looking and it is not balletic.
sent1: something is not a chirpiness. sent2: there exists something such that it transships narrative. sent3: the blackwash is dorsal. sent4: the millwright does transship narrative. sent5: the fact that the tequila does transship sugi hold. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is balletic and it does grind looking is not true. sent7: The narrative does transship millwright. sent8: the saurel does not conscript rumination but it is dorsal if something is not a margarin. sent9: if the fact that the tequila is a kind of a margarin hold then the millwright is a chirpiness but it does not transship sugi. sent10: if the saurel is a margarin then the tequila conscripts rumination. sent11: if there is something such that it is not balletic the fact that the millwright does not grind looking and transships sugi is wrong. sent12: if there is something such that it does not transship narrative then that the saurel is both not a chirpiness and not dorsal is false. sent13: the fact that that the millwright is a chirpiness and does not transship sugi is true is not correct if it does transship narrative. sent14: if there is something such that it is not balletic then that the saurel is a kind of non-dorsal thing that grinds looking is not correct. sent15: there exists something such that it is not gallinaceous. sent16: the tequila does grind looking. sent17: the fact that the blackwash does not grind looking and it is not balletic is not right if there is something such that it does not conscript rumination. sent18: the bollock does not conscript Pengo and is a entomion. sent19: if the tequila does grind looking the blackwash is a margarin. sent20: the fact that the millwright is not a kind of a margarin and is not a kind of a chirpiness does not hold if there exists something such that it is not balletic. sent21: if the millwright is dorsal then the saurel is a kind of a chirpiness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tequila is a margarin.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the millwright is a chirpiness and does not transship sugi.; sent13 & sent4 -> int2: that the millwright is a chirpiness but it does not transship sugi is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tequila is not a kind of a margarin.; int4 -> int5: something is not a margarin.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the saurel does not conscript rumination but it is dorsal.; int6 -> int7: that the saurel does not conscript rumination is not wrong.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not conscript rumination hold.; int8 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it does not conscript Steiner.
$hypothesis$ = the blackwash does not grind looking and it is not balletic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a chirpiness. sent2: there exists something such that it transships narrative. sent3: the blackwash is dorsal. sent4: the millwright does transship narrative. sent5: the fact that the tequila does transship sugi hold. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is balletic and it does grind looking is not true. sent7: The narrative does transship millwright. sent8: the saurel does not conscript rumination but it is dorsal if something is not a margarin. sent9: if the fact that the tequila is a kind of a margarin hold then the millwright is a chirpiness but it does not transship sugi. sent10: if the saurel is a margarin then the tequila conscripts rumination. sent11: if there is something such that it is not balletic the fact that the millwright does not grind looking and transships sugi is wrong. sent12: if there is something such that it does not transship narrative then that the saurel is both not a chirpiness and not dorsal is false. sent13: the fact that that the millwright is a chirpiness and does not transship sugi is true is not correct if it does transship narrative. sent14: if there is something such that it is not balletic then that the saurel is a kind of non-dorsal thing that grinds looking is not correct. sent15: there exists something such that it is not gallinaceous. sent16: the tequila does grind looking. sent17: the fact that the blackwash does not grind looking and it is not balletic is not right if there is something such that it does not conscript rumination. sent18: the bollock does not conscript Pengo and is a entomion. sent19: if the tequila does grind looking the blackwash is a margarin. sent20: the fact that the millwright is not a kind of a margarin and is not a kind of a chirpiness does not hold if there exists something such that it is not balletic. sent21: if the millwright is dorsal then the saurel is a kind of a chirpiness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tequila is a margarin.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the millwright is a chirpiness and does not transship sugi.; sent13 & sent4 -> int2: that the millwright is a chirpiness but it does not transship sugi is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tequila is not a kind of a margarin.; int4 -> int5: something is not a margarin.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the saurel does not conscript rumination but it is dorsal.; int6 -> int7: that the saurel does not conscript rumination is not wrong.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not conscript rumination hold.; int8 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__