the fact that the fact that the souk is either a oxacillin or not mediated or both does not hold if that the pooler does narrow epicanthus is right is wrong.
sent1: if that the counterperson wrestles is not incorrect the pooler is phonemic. sent2: the pooler is a roadhog but not a teammate. sent3: the souk either does stuff counterperson or is not mediated or both. sent4: the fact that the souk does mediate or it is not an editor or both does not hold. sent5: if the pooler does not stuff counterperson the fact that the souk is a oxacillin or it is non-mediated or both is not true. sent6: the bible is exchangeable if the fact that it does jiggle clavicle is not wrong. sent7: the souk is not unexchangeable. sent8: the souk is not a oxacillin. sent9: if the pooler narrows epicanthus the souk is not a kind of a oxacillin. sent10: if something is exchangeable it is a seedcake. sent11: the souk is not a oxacillin if the pooler does not stuff counterperson. sent12: the counterperson does mediate. sent13: the pooler is phonemic if the counterperson is an editor. sent14: the nutmeg-yew is a kind of exchangeable thing that does not jiggle clavicle. sent15: the nutmeg-yew is exchangeable and an editor. sent16: the fact that if the pooler does not stuff counterperson then either the souk is a oxacillin or it does not mediate or both is correct. sent17: the chestnut is a kind of defeasible thing that is not a kind of a handout. sent18: something does not stuff counterperson if it is phonemic and it narrows epicanthus. sent19: if the pooler does not stuff counterperson the fact that the souk is a oxacillin and/or it mediates is wrong. sent20: that either the souk is a oxacillin or it is mediated or both is not correct if the pooler does narrow epicanthus. sent21: if the nutmeg-yew does not jiggle clavicle then the counterperson is an editor and/or it is a wrestling.
sent14 -> int1: the nutmeg-yew does not jiggle clavicle.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: either the counterperson is an editor or it wrestles or both.; int2 & sent13 & sent1 -> int3: the pooler is phonemic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pooler narrows epicanthus.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the pooler is a kind of phonemic thing that does narrow epicanthus.; sent18 -> int5: if the pooler is phonemic and narrows epicanthus then it does not stuff counterperson.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pooler does not stuff counterperson.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the fact that the souk is a oxacillin and/or it does not mediate is incorrect.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the bible is a seedcake and a discussion.
sent10 -> int8: the bible is a kind of a seedcake if it is exchangeable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the souk is either a oxacillin or not mediated or both does not hold if that the pooler does narrow epicanthus is right is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the counterperson wrestles is not incorrect the pooler is phonemic. sent2: the pooler is a roadhog but not a teammate. sent3: the souk either does stuff counterperson or is not mediated or both. sent4: the fact that the souk does mediate or it is not an editor or both does not hold. sent5: if the pooler does not stuff counterperson the fact that the souk is a oxacillin or it is non-mediated or both is not true. sent6: the bible is exchangeable if the fact that it does jiggle clavicle is not wrong. sent7: the souk is not unexchangeable. sent8: the souk is not a oxacillin. sent9: if the pooler narrows epicanthus the souk is not a kind of a oxacillin. sent10: if something is exchangeable it is a seedcake. sent11: the souk is not a oxacillin if the pooler does not stuff counterperson. sent12: the counterperson does mediate. sent13: the pooler is phonemic if the counterperson is an editor. sent14: the nutmeg-yew is a kind of exchangeable thing that does not jiggle clavicle. sent15: the nutmeg-yew is exchangeable and an editor. sent16: the fact that if the pooler does not stuff counterperson then either the souk is a oxacillin or it does not mediate or both is correct. sent17: the chestnut is a kind of defeasible thing that is not a kind of a handout. sent18: something does not stuff counterperson if it is phonemic and it narrows epicanthus. sent19: if the pooler does not stuff counterperson the fact that the souk is a oxacillin and/or it mediates is wrong. sent20: that either the souk is a oxacillin or it is mediated or both is not correct if the pooler does narrow epicanthus. sent21: if the nutmeg-yew does not jiggle clavicle then the counterperson is an editor and/or it is a wrestling. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the nutmeg-yew does not jiggle clavicle.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: either the counterperson is an editor or it wrestles or both.; int2 & sent13 & sent1 -> int3: the pooler is phonemic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pooler narrows epicanthus.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the pooler is a kind of phonemic thing that does narrow epicanthus.; sent18 -> int5: if the pooler is phonemic and narrows epicanthus then it does not stuff counterperson.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pooler does not stuff counterperson.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the fact that the souk is a oxacillin and/or it does not mediate is incorrect.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__