the folio does not elongate.
sent1: the caper does not squawk Cariama. sent2: the caper is not a spyware. sent3: a cohesiveness is a hallux. sent4: if the caper does squawk Cariama and is a celebrity the motmot is a jitters. sent5: the fact that the arenavirus is both not unreproducible and a cohesiveness is not correct. sent6: if something is not a cohesiveness then the fact that it is a kind of a hallux and is naturistic is not correct. sent7: the fact that the motmot is a cohesiveness is correct. sent8: if the fact that the arenavirus is not unreproducible but it is a cohesiveness is incorrect the vitriol is not a cohesiveness. sent9: if the caper is not a spyware it does not squawk Cariama. sent10: the cyclotron is both not associative and a cohesiveness. sent11: if the caper does not squawk Cariama and is a kind of a celebrity the motmot is a jitters. sent12: if the motmot is not a kind of a spyware and is a jitters then the fact that the caper is a spyware hold. sent13: there exists something such that it is a kind of a hallux. sent14: the vitriol is naturistic if something that is a jitters is a kind of a hallux. sent15: if the caper is not a kind of a spyware then it does not squawk Cariama and it is a kind of a celebrity. sent16: that there exists something such that it is a jitters is correct. sent17: the folio elongates if the vitriol is naturistic.
sent15 & sent2 -> int1: the caper does not squawk Cariama but it is a celebrity.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the motmot is a kind of a jitters.; sent3 -> int3: the motmot is a hallux if it is a cohesiveness.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the motmot is a hallux is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: that the motmot is a kind of a jitters and it is a hallux is correct.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a jitters and it is a kind of a hallux.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the vitriol is naturistic.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the folio does not elongate.
sent6 -> int8: if the vitriol is not a kind of a cohesiveness the fact that it is a kind of a hallux and it is not non-naturistic is not true.; sent8 & sent5 -> int9: the vitriol is not a cohesiveness.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the vitriol is a hallux that is naturistic is incorrect.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it is a hallux and naturistic is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the folio does not elongate. ; $context$ = sent1: the caper does not squawk Cariama. sent2: the caper is not a spyware. sent3: a cohesiveness is a hallux. sent4: if the caper does squawk Cariama and is a celebrity the motmot is a jitters. sent5: the fact that the arenavirus is both not unreproducible and a cohesiveness is not correct. sent6: if something is not a cohesiveness then the fact that it is a kind of a hallux and is naturistic is not correct. sent7: the fact that the motmot is a cohesiveness is correct. sent8: if the fact that the arenavirus is not unreproducible but it is a cohesiveness is incorrect the vitriol is not a cohesiveness. sent9: if the caper is not a spyware it does not squawk Cariama. sent10: the cyclotron is both not associative and a cohesiveness. sent11: if the caper does not squawk Cariama and is a kind of a celebrity the motmot is a jitters. sent12: if the motmot is not a kind of a spyware and is a jitters then the fact that the caper is a spyware hold. sent13: there exists something such that it is a kind of a hallux. sent14: the vitriol is naturistic if something that is a jitters is a kind of a hallux. sent15: if the caper is not a kind of a spyware then it does not squawk Cariama and it is a kind of a celebrity. sent16: that there exists something such that it is a jitters is correct. sent17: the folio elongates if the vitriol is naturistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent2 -> int1: the caper does not squawk Cariama but it is a celebrity.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the motmot is a kind of a jitters.; sent3 -> int3: the motmot is a hallux if it is a cohesiveness.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the motmot is a hallux is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: that the motmot is a kind of a jitters and it is a hallux is correct.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a jitters and it is a kind of a hallux.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the vitriol is naturistic.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__