the fact that that the positionalness but not the bar happens yields the Augustanness is not correct.
sent1: if the mutafacientness does not occur and/or the histocompatibility does not occur the clericalness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the positionalness happens but the bar does not occur is wrong if the mutafacientness occurs. sent3: if the mutafacientness happens then the positionalness happens and the barring does not occur. sent4: the fact that both the replicating incredulity and the non-configurationalness occurs is false. sent5: the incredulousness happens. sent6: if the clericalness does not occur the fact that both the rub and the non-abaxialness happens does not hold. sent7: that the Augustanness occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the rub and the non-abaxialness occurs is wrong. sent8: the mutafacientness does not occur and/or the histocompatibility occurs. sent9: the macroeconomicness happens. sent10: the fact that the metabolizing supervention occurs and the disconnection does not occur is not correct if the impatientness occurs. sent11: the opticalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mutafacientness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that that the positionalness happens but the bar does not occur does not hold is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the positionalness occurs and the barring does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the mutafacientness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the mutafacientness does not occur and/or the histocompatibility does not occur.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the clericalness does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: that the rub happens and the abaxialness does not occur does not hold.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Augustanness occurs.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the replicating incredulity and the non-configurationalness occurs is false.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the positionalness but not the bar happens yields the Augustanness is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mutafacientness does not occur and/or the histocompatibility does not occur the clericalness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the positionalness happens but the bar does not occur is wrong if the mutafacientness occurs. sent3: if the mutafacientness happens then the positionalness happens and the barring does not occur. sent4: the fact that both the replicating incredulity and the non-configurationalness occurs is false. sent5: the incredulousness happens. sent6: if the clericalness does not occur the fact that both the rub and the non-abaxialness happens does not hold. sent7: that the Augustanness occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the rub and the non-abaxialness occurs is wrong. sent8: the mutafacientness does not occur and/or the histocompatibility occurs. sent9: the macroeconomicness happens. sent10: the fact that the metabolizing supervention occurs and the disconnection does not occur is not correct if the impatientness occurs. sent11: the opticalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mutafacientness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that that the positionalness happens but the bar does not occur does not hold is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the positionalness occurs and the barring does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the mutafacientness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the mutafacientness does not occur and/or the histocompatibility does not occur.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the clericalness does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: that the rub happens and the abaxialness does not occur does not hold.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Augustanness occurs.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__