the geneva is not a shakedown.
sent1: the allergen is not unargumentative. sent2: the geneva is most-favored-nation if there exists something such that that either it is not a rockers or it is unargumentative or both is not correct. sent3: there is something such that it is not a kind of a rockers or is unargumentative or both. sent4: the crinoid beats mujahidin and it is unargumentative. sent5: everything is not a naproxen and not a democrat. sent6: there is something such that it is not unargumentative. sent7: there is something such that it is not a democrat. sent8: if the geneva is a rockers and does beat mujahidin then it is not nonfissile. sent9: there is something such that it is not a kind of a naproxen. sent10: if something is not unargumentative then it is a shakedown and it beats mujahidin. sent11: if the crinoid is unargumentative the fact that the allergen is not a rockers and/or it is unargumentative does not hold. sent12: if something is not a naproxen and it is not a democrat then the geneva is nonfissile. sent13: the allergen is not unargumentative if the crinoid is unargumentative.
sent4 -> int1: the crinoid is unargumentative.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the allergen is not a kind of a rockers and/or it is unargumentative is false.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that either it is not a rockers or it is not argumentative or both is not right.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the geneva is most-favored-nation.; sent5 -> int5: the undesirable is not a naproxen and it is not a kind of a democrat.; int5 -> int6: something is not a naproxen and is not a democrat.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the geneva is nonfissile.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the geneva is most-favored-nation and it is nonfissile.;
the geneva is not non-shakedown.
sent10 -> int9: the geneva is a shakedown and it does beat mujahidin if that it is not unargumentative is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the geneva is not a shakedown. ; $context$ = sent1: the allergen is not unargumentative. sent2: the geneva is most-favored-nation if there exists something such that that either it is not a rockers or it is unargumentative or both is not correct. sent3: there is something such that it is not a kind of a rockers or is unargumentative or both. sent4: the crinoid beats mujahidin and it is unargumentative. sent5: everything is not a naproxen and not a democrat. sent6: there is something such that it is not unargumentative. sent7: there is something such that it is not a democrat. sent8: if the geneva is a rockers and does beat mujahidin then it is not nonfissile. sent9: there is something such that it is not a kind of a naproxen. sent10: if something is not unargumentative then it is a shakedown and it beats mujahidin. sent11: if the crinoid is unargumentative the fact that the allergen is not a rockers and/or it is unargumentative does not hold. sent12: if something is not a naproxen and it is not a democrat then the geneva is nonfissile. sent13: the allergen is not unargumentative if the crinoid is unargumentative. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the crinoid is unargumentative.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the allergen is not a kind of a rockers and/or it is unargumentative is false.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that either it is not a rockers or it is not argumentative or both is not right.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the geneva is most-favored-nation.; sent5 -> int5: the undesirable is not a naproxen and it is not a kind of a democrat.; int5 -> int6: something is not a naproxen and is not a democrat.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the geneva is nonfissile.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the geneva is most-favored-nation and it is nonfissile.; __UNKNOWN__