the kaleidoscope does not retouch Lagidium.
sent1: that the kaleidoscope does clangor perfusion does not hold if that the abbacy is a kind of a lumbering that clangor perfusion does not hold. sent2: everything is not a kind of a Witwatersrand and it does not clangor perfusion. sent3: something does not retouch Lagidium if that it is amylolytic a lumbering does not hold. sent4: if something lumbers it retouches Lagidium. sent5: something is not a Bluegrass if that it is ecological and is a hydrophobicity does not hold. sent6: that the Jacksonian does not clangor perfusion is not false. sent7: if the kaleidoscope does not retouch Lagidium but it is a Witwatersrand the Jacksonian does not clangor perfusion. sent8: something does not retouch Lagidium if it is not a lumbering. sent9: if the Jacksonian is not a Witwatersrand and it does not clangor perfusion the sharpie is not a kind of a lumbering. sent10: if the kaleidoscope does not clangor perfusion and does not lumber the sharpie does not retouch Lagidium. sent11: if the sharpie does not lumber that the kaleidoscope is amylolytic and it does lumber is wrong. sent12: if the fact that something is not amylolytic and it is not a kind of a lumbering is not right the fact that it is a lumbering hold. sent13: everything does not clangor perfusion. sent14: if that something is impermanent and it is a kind of a statuary is incorrect it is not catadromous. sent15: if the advancer is not sobering it is a kind of a lanyard that does retouch Lagidium. sent16: the fact that the kaleidoscope is not amylolytic and it is not a lumbering is not true if the sharpie is not a lanyard. sent17: if the kaleidoscope does not lumber then it does not retouch Lagidium. sent18: the advancer does not sober. sent19: the kaleidoscope does not clangor perfusion.
sent2 -> int1: the Jacksonian is not a Witwatersrand and does not clangor perfusion.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the sharpie is not a lumbering.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the kaleidoscope is a kind of amylolytic a lumbering is false.; sent3 -> int4: that the kaleidoscope does not retouch Lagidium is not incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of amylolytic a lumbering does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the sharpie clangors perfusion and it does retouch rage is not correct.
sent15 & sent18 -> int5: the advancer is a lanyard and it does retouch Lagidium.; int5 -> int6: something is a lanyard and it retouches Lagidium.;
$hypothesis$ = the kaleidoscope does not retouch Lagidium. ; $context$ = sent1: that the kaleidoscope does clangor perfusion does not hold if that the abbacy is a kind of a lumbering that clangor perfusion does not hold. sent2: everything is not a kind of a Witwatersrand and it does not clangor perfusion. sent3: something does not retouch Lagidium if that it is amylolytic a lumbering does not hold. sent4: if something lumbers it retouches Lagidium. sent5: something is not a Bluegrass if that it is ecological and is a hydrophobicity does not hold. sent6: that the Jacksonian does not clangor perfusion is not false. sent7: if the kaleidoscope does not retouch Lagidium but it is a Witwatersrand the Jacksonian does not clangor perfusion. sent8: something does not retouch Lagidium if it is not a lumbering. sent9: if the Jacksonian is not a Witwatersrand and it does not clangor perfusion the sharpie is not a kind of a lumbering. sent10: if the kaleidoscope does not clangor perfusion and does not lumber the sharpie does not retouch Lagidium. sent11: if the sharpie does not lumber that the kaleidoscope is amylolytic and it does lumber is wrong. sent12: if the fact that something is not amylolytic and it is not a kind of a lumbering is not right the fact that it is a lumbering hold. sent13: everything does not clangor perfusion. sent14: if that something is impermanent and it is a kind of a statuary is incorrect it is not catadromous. sent15: if the advancer is not sobering it is a kind of a lanyard that does retouch Lagidium. sent16: the fact that the kaleidoscope is not amylolytic and it is not a lumbering is not true if the sharpie is not a lanyard. sent17: if the kaleidoscope does not lumber then it does not retouch Lagidium. sent18: the advancer does not sober. sent19: the kaleidoscope does not clangor perfusion. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the Jacksonian is not a Witwatersrand and does not clangor perfusion.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the sharpie is not a lumbering.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the kaleidoscope is a kind of amylolytic a lumbering is false.; sent3 -> int4: that the kaleidoscope does not retouch Lagidium is not incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of amylolytic a lumbering does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__