the eagerness does not occur.
sent1: if not the stooging but the phenomenon occurs the dominating Balder happens. sent2: the stooging does not occur. sent3: the electroencephalographicness occurs. sent4: the dominating Balder prevents the non-eagerness. sent5: the phenomenon happens.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the stooging does not occur and the phenomenon occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the dominating Balder happens.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the eagerness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if not the stooging but the phenomenon occurs the dominating Balder happens. sent2: the stooging does not occur. sent3: the electroencephalographicness occurs. sent4: the dominating Balder prevents the non-eagerness. sent5: the phenomenon happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the stooging does not occur and the phenomenon occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the dominating Balder happens.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__