the endoscope is not a pregnancy.
sent1: the Elamite is not reversionary if the fact that the amorphophallus is not pyrectic and/or it is not reversionary is not right. sent2: the endoscope does misdirect if the amorphophallus is pyrectic. sent3: the adenovirus is a kind of a surfer. sent4: the trou-de-loup is neoplastic and it is a ingenuousness if it is not a kind of a Scott. sent5: if the adenovirus does tarnish cost then the Elamite is not non-reversionary. sent6: the amorphophallus chomps aerogram. sent7: if that the Elamite is reversionary hold it does chomp aerogram. sent8: that something is not a Tulu and/or is a kind of a tolazoline is false if the fact that it is a kind of a ingenuousness is true. sent9: the endoscope is pyrectic. sent10: if something does not misdirect it does not chomp aerogram. sent11: the endoscope is not a pregnancy if the adenovirus is not a surfer but it tarnishes cost. sent12: if the endoscope does misdirect it is a pregnancy. sent13: if the ethnologist does not chomp aerogram that the amorphophallus either is not pyrectic or is not reversionary or both is not right. sent14: if the adenovirus is a surfer it tarnishes cost. sent15: the amorphophallus is pyrectic if the Elamite chomps aerogram. sent16: that the endoscope is pyrectic hold if the amorphophallus does misdirect. sent17: the trou-de-loup does not chomp Khalsa and it is not a Scott if it is chitinous. sent18: the ethnologist does not misdirect if the fact that the trou-de-loup is not a kind of a Tulu and/or is a kind of a tolazoline is not correct.
sent14 & sent3 -> int1: the adenovirus does tarnish cost.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the Elamite is reversionary.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Elamite does chomp aerogram.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the amorphophallus is pyrectic.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the endoscope misdirects.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the endoscope is not a pregnancy.
sent10 -> int6: if the ethnologist does not misdirect it does not chomp aerogram.; sent8 -> int7: the fact that the trou-de-loup is not a Tulu and/or it is a kind of a tolazoline is not true if it is a ingenuousness.;
$hypothesis$ = the endoscope is not a pregnancy. ; $context$ = sent1: the Elamite is not reversionary if the fact that the amorphophallus is not pyrectic and/or it is not reversionary is not right. sent2: the endoscope does misdirect if the amorphophallus is pyrectic. sent3: the adenovirus is a kind of a surfer. sent4: the trou-de-loup is neoplastic and it is a ingenuousness if it is not a kind of a Scott. sent5: if the adenovirus does tarnish cost then the Elamite is not non-reversionary. sent6: the amorphophallus chomps aerogram. sent7: if that the Elamite is reversionary hold it does chomp aerogram. sent8: that something is not a Tulu and/or is a kind of a tolazoline is false if the fact that it is a kind of a ingenuousness is true. sent9: the endoscope is pyrectic. sent10: if something does not misdirect it does not chomp aerogram. sent11: the endoscope is not a pregnancy if the adenovirus is not a surfer but it tarnishes cost. sent12: if the endoscope does misdirect it is a pregnancy. sent13: if the ethnologist does not chomp aerogram that the amorphophallus either is not pyrectic or is not reversionary or both is not right. sent14: if the adenovirus is a surfer it tarnishes cost. sent15: the amorphophallus is pyrectic if the Elamite chomps aerogram. sent16: that the endoscope is pyrectic hold if the amorphophallus does misdirect. sent17: the trou-de-loup does not chomp Khalsa and it is not a Scott if it is chitinous. sent18: the ethnologist does not misdirect if the fact that the trou-de-loup is not a kind of a Tulu and/or is a kind of a tolazoline is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent3 -> int1: the adenovirus does tarnish cost.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the Elamite is reversionary.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Elamite does chomp aerogram.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the amorphophallus is pyrectic.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the endoscope misdirects.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__