the fact that the toner is limbless is right.
sent1: the woodcock is a kind of a self-criticism. sent2: the toner is not limbless if a hydrophobicity is not actual. sent3: if something is not non-basic then that it is actual hold. sent4: there is something such that it is not a Tolstoy. sent5: if something is actual then it is a kind of a hydrophobicity. sent6: the oriole is not a kind of a Tolstoy and it is not a kind of a skank if the lumper is not a hydrophobicity. sent7: if the fact that the lumper is a sextant is not false then the toner is limbless. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not actual then the lumper is not actual. sent9: the zill is not a kind of a pick-off. sent10: if there is something such that either it is not actual or it is not compatible or both then the lumper is not actual. sent11: the woodcock is not actual and/or is not compatible. sent12: there exists something such that it is a timer that is not epiphytic. sent13: if the fact that something is not compatible but it is an insider does not hold then it is basic. sent14: the course is not a sextant if something is not a Tolstoy and it is not a skank. sent15: if the fact that there is something such that it is a kind of a self-criticism is correct then the course does school Petauristidae and it is a hat. sent16: the course is a sextant and not non-basic. sent17: the lumper is a sextant or it is limbless or both if something is a hydrophobicity. sent18: there exists nothing that is a kind of a hydrophobicity and is a kummel. sent19: there is something such that it is not a skank. sent20: the course is not uricosuric. sent21: that the oriole is incompatible but it is an insider is not right if the course does school Petauristidae.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lumper is not a hydrophobicity.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the oriole is both not a Tolstoy and not a skank hold.; int1 -> int2: something is not a Tolstoy and it is not a skank.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the course is not a sextant.; sent16 -> int4: the course is a kind of a sextant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the lumper is a hydrophobicity.; sent11 -> int7: something is not actual and/or it is not compatible.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the lumper is not actual.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the lumper is a hydrophobicity and is not actual.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a hydrophobicity and it is not actual.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is not a kummel and it is not a tumult.
sent18 -> int11: that the oriole is a hydrophobicity and it is a kind of a kummel is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the toner is limbless is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the woodcock is a kind of a self-criticism. sent2: the toner is not limbless if a hydrophobicity is not actual. sent3: if something is not non-basic then that it is actual hold. sent4: there is something such that it is not a Tolstoy. sent5: if something is actual then it is a kind of a hydrophobicity. sent6: the oriole is not a kind of a Tolstoy and it is not a kind of a skank if the lumper is not a hydrophobicity. sent7: if the fact that the lumper is a sextant is not false then the toner is limbless. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not actual then the lumper is not actual. sent9: the zill is not a kind of a pick-off. sent10: if there is something such that either it is not actual or it is not compatible or both then the lumper is not actual. sent11: the woodcock is not actual and/or is not compatible. sent12: there exists something such that it is a timer that is not epiphytic. sent13: if the fact that something is not compatible but it is an insider does not hold then it is basic. sent14: the course is not a sextant if something is not a Tolstoy and it is not a skank. sent15: if the fact that there is something such that it is a kind of a self-criticism is correct then the course does school Petauristidae and it is a hat. sent16: the course is a sextant and not non-basic. sent17: the lumper is a sextant or it is limbless or both if something is a hydrophobicity. sent18: there exists nothing that is a kind of a hydrophobicity and is a kummel. sent19: there is something such that it is not a skank. sent20: the course is not uricosuric. sent21: that the oriole is incompatible but it is an insider is not right if the course does school Petauristidae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lumper is not a hydrophobicity.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the oriole is both not a Tolstoy and not a skank hold.; int1 -> int2: something is not a Tolstoy and it is not a skank.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the course is not a sextant.; sent16 -> int4: the course is a kind of a sextant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the lumper is a hydrophobicity.; sent11 -> int7: something is not actual and/or it is not compatible.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the lumper is not actual.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the lumper is a hydrophobicity and is not actual.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a hydrophobicity and it is not actual.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__