the petticoat pets.
sent1: something is erythroid if it is not a kind of a welcome. sent2: the Vaishnava is not maxillodental. sent3: the silkgrass is carbonyl and caskets Varese if the Vaishnava is non-maxillodental. sent4: the Pollock is expansionist if the saver is plutocratic. sent5: something that leaches fluvastatin is a pet. sent6: the bronchiole does multiply telemetered if it is a kind of a pet. sent7: the silkgrass is cementitious if it does casket Varese. sent8: the petticoat is not a kind of a welcome. sent9: the erythroblast is not a kind of a pet if there is something such that it does ask Eburophyton. sent10: the petticoat is erythroid. sent11: if a dialectics is a bibliophile then the petticoat asks Eburophyton. sent12: if the petticoat is not a welcome then it is erythroid. sent13: if there exists something such that it is plutocratic then the saver is plutocratic or whistles or both. sent14: if that the petticoat does not welcome is true it is a kind of erythroid thing that does leach fluvastatin. sent15: the Gael is plutocratic. sent16: if that the petticoat is not expansionist is not wrong the fact that it is not a rummer is incorrect. sent17: if there is something such that it is cementitious the Pollock is a dialectics. sent18: if the saver is a kind of a whistling then the Pollock is expansionist. sent19: if something is expansionist it is a bibliophile.
sent14 & sent8 -> int1: the petticoat is erythroid and it does leach fluvastatin.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the petticoat leaches fluvastatin hold.; sent5 -> int3: the petticoat is a pet if it leaches fluvastatin.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the erythroblast is erythroid.
sent1 -> int4: the erythroblast is erythroid if it does not welcome.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the silkgrass is a kind of a carbonyl and it does casket Varese.; int5 -> int6: the silkgrass caskets Varese.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the silkgrass is cementitious.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is cementitious.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the Pollock is dialectics.; sent19 -> int10: if the Pollock is expansionist then it is a kind of a bibliophile.; sent15 -> int11: there exists something such that it is plutocratic.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: the saver is plutocratic or a whistling or both.; int12 & sent4 & sent18 -> int13: the fact that the Pollock is expansionist is right.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the Pollock is a bibliophile.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the Pollock is dialectics and it is a bibliophile.; int15 -> int16: that something is a dialectics and it is a bibliophile is true.; int16 & sent11 -> int17: the fact that the petticoat asks Eburophyton is not false.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it asks Eburophyton.; int18 & sent9 -> int19: the erythroblast is not a pet.;
$hypothesis$ = the petticoat pets. ; $context$ = sent1: something is erythroid if it is not a kind of a welcome. sent2: the Vaishnava is not maxillodental. sent3: the silkgrass is carbonyl and caskets Varese if the Vaishnava is non-maxillodental. sent4: the Pollock is expansionist if the saver is plutocratic. sent5: something that leaches fluvastatin is a pet. sent6: the bronchiole does multiply telemetered if it is a kind of a pet. sent7: the silkgrass is cementitious if it does casket Varese. sent8: the petticoat is not a kind of a welcome. sent9: the erythroblast is not a kind of a pet if there is something such that it does ask Eburophyton. sent10: the petticoat is erythroid. sent11: if a dialectics is a bibliophile then the petticoat asks Eburophyton. sent12: if the petticoat is not a welcome then it is erythroid. sent13: if there exists something such that it is plutocratic then the saver is plutocratic or whistles or both. sent14: if that the petticoat does not welcome is true it is a kind of erythroid thing that does leach fluvastatin. sent15: the Gael is plutocratic. sent16: if that the petticoat is not expansionist is not wrong the fact that it is not a rummer is incorrect. sent17: if there is something such that it is cementitious the Pollock is a dialectics. sent18: if the saver is a kind of a whistling then the Pollock is expansionist. sent19: if something is expansionist it is a bibliophile. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent8 -> int1: the petticoat is erythroid and it does leach fluvastatin.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the petticoat leaches fluvastatin hold.; sent5 -> int3: the petticoat is a pet if it leaches fluvastatin.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__