that there exists something such that it does dim biomedicine and it is not ecclesiastical is not true.
sent1: the Oklahoman is not a Swietinia if the cruse is not adjudicative but it is a kind of a Swietinia. sent2: something dims biomedicine. sent3: if that something is adjudicative but not a Swietinia does not hold it is ecclesiastical. sent4: the cruse is not adjudicative but it is a Swietinia if the Somali is not a hawk. sent5: if the Somali is not nontraditional then the fact that it is not a kind of a Swietinia or is not a hawk or both is not right. sent6: that something is nontraditional is not incorrect if that it does dim biomedicine and it is not ecclesiastical is wrong. sent7: if something is nontraditional it is a Swietinia. sent8: the Somali is uncontroversial but it does not hawk.
sent6 -> int1: the Oklahoman is nontraditional if that it dims biomedicine and it is not ecclesiastical is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Oklahoman does dim biomedicine but it is not ecclesiastical is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Oklahoman is nontraditional.; sent7 -> int3: if the Oklahoman is nontraditional then it is a Swietinia.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Oklahoman is a Swietinia.; sent8 -> int5: the fact that the Somali does not hawk is correct.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the cruse is a kind of non-adjudicative thing that is a Swietinia.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the Oklahoman is not a kind of a Swietinia.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Oklahoman dims biomedicine and is not ecclesiastical.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the whetstone dims biomedicine and is not aroid.
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that it does dim biomedicine and it is not ecclesiastical is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the Oklahoman is not a Swietinia if the cruse is not adjudicative but it is a kind of a Swietinia. sent2: something dims biomedicine. sent3: if that something is adjudicative but not a Swietinia does not hold it is ecclesiastical. sent4: the cruse is not adjudicative but it is a Swietinia if the Somali is not a hawk. sent5: if the Somali is not nontraditional then the fact that it is not a kind of a Swietinia or is not a hawk or both is not right. sent6: that something is nontraditional is not incorrect if that it does dim biomedicine and it is not ecclesiastical is wrong. sent7: if something is nontraditional it is a Swietinia. sent8: the Somali is uncontroversial but it does not hawk. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the Oklahoman is nontraditional if that it dims biomedicine and it is not ecclesiastical is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Oklahoman does dim biomedicine but it is not ecclesiastical is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Oklahoman is nontraditional.; sent7 -> int3: if the Oklahoman is nontraditional then it is a Swietinia.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Oklahoman is a Swietinia.; sent8 -> int5: the fact that the Somali does not hawk is correct.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the cruse is a kind of non-adjudicative thing that is a Swietinia.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the Oklahoman is not a kind of a Swietinia.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Oklahoman dims biomedicine and is not ecclesiastical.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__