that if the fact that the linchpin does organize ferrite but it does not effect inspectorate does not hold then the reformatory is not a minuteness is incorrect.
sent1: the linchpin does not organize ferrite. sent2: if the linchpin effects inspectorate that the reformatory does not cowl is incorrect. sent3: the lens does not trip eyeshadow if the reformatory is both a cowled and a minuteness. sent4: that something is both a Hindu and not a liquor is incorrect if the fact that it is a bonheur hold. sent5: if something is not a Hindu then it trips eyeshadow. sent6: that something is not a PABA and/or is animatistic does not hold if it is not a bellows. sent7: the heroine is a bonheur if the fact that the Sind is Confucian and/or not a Segway does not hold. sent8: the fact that something does effect inspectorate and is not a bonheur does not hold if it is a kind of a minuteness. sent9: that the reformatory is a kind of a minuteness and is a Hindu is not true. sent10: that the gelatin is mortuary and is not a kind of a splinter does not hold. sent11: if something is stoichiometric then that it is a Confucian and/or is not a Segway is false. sent12: the linchpin is not a minuteness if there is something such that the fact that it does trip eyeshadow and is not a kind of a cowled is not correct. sent13: the lens is a kind of a Hindu if the fact that it does effect inspectorate and does not trip eyeshadow is incorrect. sent14: if the fact that something is a Hindu but it is not a liquor does not hold then it does trip eyeshadow. sent15: the lens is a bonheur and it is a kind of a Segway. sent16: the cartouche does osculate but it is not a kind of a Tiberius if there exists something such that it is a practicability. sent17: the fugitive is not a kind of a PABA if the fact that either the beryl is not a PABA or it is animatistic or both is wrong. sent18: if the linchpin is not a kind of a Hindu the lens does effect inspectorate. sent19: the Sind effects Wiener and it is stoichiometric if the fugitive is not a PABA. sent20: if that the linchpin does organize ferrite but it does not effect inspectorate is incorrect then the reformatory does cowl. sent21: that the reformatory is a kind of Hindu thing that is not obstetrics is false if the linchpin is not a minuteness. sent22: the gelatin is a practicability if that it is mortuary and it does not splinter does not hold. sent23: if the heroine is a liquor the fact that the fact that the lens does trip eyeshadow but it does not cowl is not wrong is incorrect. sent24: the beryl is not a bellows if something that does osculate is not a kind of a Tiberius. sent25: if the lens is not a Hindu it trips eyeshadow.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the linchpin does organize ferrite and does not effect inspectorate does not hold.; sent20 & assump2 -> int1: the reformatory cowls.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reformatory is a minuteness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the reformatory cowls and it is a minuteness.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the lens does not trip eyeshadow.; sent14 -> int4: the fact that the lens trips eyeshadow is right if that it is a Hindu and it is not a liquor is not right.; sent4 -> int5: if the lens is a bonheur then the fact that it is Hindu but not a liquor is incorrect.; sent15 -> int6: the lens is a bonheur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the lens is not non-Hindu but it is not a kind of a liquor is not right.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the lens does trip eyeshadow.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the reformatory is not a minuteness.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the reformatory is a kind of a Hindu but it is not obstetrics is wrong.
sent11 -> int11: if the Sind is stoichiometric then the fact that it is Confucian and/or it is not a Segway is not right.; sent6 -> int12: the fact that the beryl is not a PABA and/or is animatistic is not correct if it does not bellow.; sent22 & sent10 -> int13: the gelatin is a kind of a practicability.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is a practicability.; int14 & sent16 -> int15: the cartouche osculates but it is not a Tiberius.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that that it does osculate and is not a Tiberius is correct.; int16 & sent24 -> int17: the beryl is not a bellows.; int12 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the beryl is not a PABA or is animatistic or both does not hold.; sent17 & int18 -> int19: the fugitive is not a PABA.; sent19 & int19 -> int20: the Sind does effect Wiener and is stoichiometric.; int20 -> int21: the Sind is stoichiometric.; int11 & int21 -> int22: the fact that the fact that the Sind is Confucian and/or it is not a Segway is true is not correct.; sent7 & int22 -> int23: the heroine is a bonheur.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the linchpin does organize ferrite but it does not effect inspectorate does not hold then the reformatory is not a minuteness is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the linchpin does not organize ferrite. sent2: if the linchpin effects inspectorate that the reformatory does not cowl is incorrect. sent3: the lens does not trip eyeshadow if the reformatory is both a cowled and a minuteness. sent4: that something is both a Hindu and not a liquor is incorrect if the fact that it is a bonheur hold. sent5: if something is not a Hindu then it trips eyeshadow. sent6: that something is not a PABA and/or is animatistic does not hold if it is not a bellows. sent7: the heroine is a bonheur if the fact that the Sind is Confucian and/or not a Segway does not hold. sent8: the fact that something does effect inspectorate and is not a bonheur does not hold if it is a kind of a minuteness. sent9: that the reformatory is a kind of a minuteness and is a Hindu is not true. sent10: that the gelatin is mortuary and is not a kind of a splinter does not hold. sent11: if something is stoichiometric then that it is a Confucian and/or is not a Segway is false. sent12: the linchpin is not a minuteness if there is something such that the fact that it does trip eyeshadow and is not a kind of a cowled is not correct. sent13: the lens is a kind of a Hindu if the fact that it does effect inspectorate and does not trip eyeshadow is incorrect. sent14: if the fact that something is a Hindu but it is not a liquor does not hold then it does trip eyeshadow. sent15: the lens is a bonheur and it is a kind of a Segway. sent16: the cartouche does osculate but it is not a kind of a Tiberius if there exists something such that it is a practicability. sent17: the fugitive is not a kind of a PABA if the fact that either the beryl is not a PABA or it is animatistic or both is wrong. sent18: if the linchpin is not a kind of a Hindu the lens does effect inspectorate. sent19: the Sind effects Wiener and it is stoichiometric if the fugitive is not a PABA. sent20: if that the linchpin does organize ferrite but it does not effect inspectorate is incorrect then the reformatory does cowl. sent21: that the reformatory is a kind of Hindu thing that is not obstetrics is false if the linchpin is not a minuteness. sent22: the gelatin is a practicability if that it is mortuary and it does not splinter does not hold. sent23: if the heroine is a liquor the fact that the fact that the lens does trip eyeshadow but it does not cowl is not wrong is incorrect. sent24: the beryl is not a bellows if something that does osculate is not a kind of a Tiberius. sent25: if the lens is not a Hindu it trips eyeshadow. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the linchpin does organize ferrite and does not effect inspectorate does not hold.; sent20 & assump2 -> int1: the reformatory cowls.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reformatory is a minuteness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the reformatory cowls and it is a minuteness.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the lens does not trip eyeshadow.; sent14 -> int4: the fact that the lens trips eyeshadow is right if that it is a Hindu and it is not a liquor is not right.; sent4 -> int5: if the lens is a bonheur then the fact that it is Hindu but not a liquor is incorrect.; sent15 -> int6: the lens is a bonheur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the lens is not non-Hindu but it is not a kind of a liquor is not right.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the lens does trip eyeshadow.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the reformatory is not a minuteness.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__