the cabin is a enervation that is a mnemonic.
sent1: the cabin does scallop Aristotelianism and is a mnemonic. sent2: the cabin is a enervation if the Burgundy is cinerary. sent3: the fact that the overlay is dialectal a enervation is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the Burgundy is a enervation and not cinerary is not right. sent5: that the cabin is pyloric but it does not scallop Curculionidae is wrong. sent6: the cabin is a enervation if that the Burgundy is a enervation that is not cinerary is incorrect. sent7: if that the Burgundy does scallop Aristotelianism but it is not a enervation is wrong then the fact that the cabin does scallop Aristotelianism hold. sent8: if there is something such that it is cinerary then that the Burgundy is not a volume and it does not scallop Aristotelianism does not hold. sent9: the Burgundy is mnemonic. sent10: the salad is not a Jakobson. sent11: the pavior is cinerary if it is a cubist. sent12: if the fact that the salad is a kind of a cubist hold then the pavior is cubist. sent13: the tot scallops Aristotelianism. sent14: if either the salad is not a Jakobson or it is cubist or both it is cubist.
sent1 -> int1: the cabin is mnemonic.; sent6 & sent4 -> int2: the cabin is a enervation.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cabin is a enervation and it is a kind of a mnemonic is not right.
sent10 -> int3: the salad is not a Jakobson or it is a cubist or both.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the salad is a cubist.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the pavior is a cubist.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: that the pavior is cinerary is correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is cinerary.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the Burgundy is not a kind of a volume and does not scallop Aristotelianism does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the cabin is a enervation that is a mnemonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the cabin does scallop Aristotelianism and is a mnemonic. sent2: the cabin is a enervation if the Burgundy is cinerary. sent3: the fact that the overlay is dialectal a enervation is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the Burgundy is a enervation and not cinerary is not right. sent5: that the cabin is pyloric but it does not scallop Curculionidae is wrong. sent6: the cabin is a enervation if that the Burgundy is a enervation that is not cinerary is incorrect. sent7: if that the Burgundy does scallop Aristotelianism but it is not a enervation is wrong then the fact that the cabin does scallop Aristotelianism hold. sent8: if there is something such that it is cinerary then that the Burgundy is not a volume and it does not scallop Aristotelianism does not hold. sent9: the Burgundy is mnemonic. sent10: the salad is not a Jakobson. sent11: the pavior is cinerary if it is a cubist. sent12: if the fact that the salad is a kind of a cubist hold then the pavior is cubist. sent13: the tot scallops Aristotelianism. sent14: if either the salad is not a Jakobson or it is cubist or both it is cubist. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the cabin is mnemonic.; sent6 & sent4 -> int2: the cabin is a enervation.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__