the afghan is a klaxon and architectural.
sent1: the fact that the beebalm is not unmusical hold. sent2: the demister does not muff urodele. sent3: if something does not muff urodele it is both a klaxon and architectural. sent4: the beebalm does muff urodele and it is a kind of a sectarian. sent5: the beebalm is a klaxon. sent6: if the beebalm is not architectural the fact that the afghan is a kind of a klaxon that is architectural does not hold. sent7: the hatchery is not a kind of a sectarian. sent8: the beebalm is non-freesia and it is not unmusical. sent9: if the beebalm is both not freesia and not unmusical then it is lexicographic. sent10: if something that muffs urodele is a sallet then it is not bacteroidal. sent11: if the afghan is architectural but it is not a klaxon it is unmusical. sent12: the beebalm is a sectarian. sent13: the beebalm is lexicographic if it is not a kind of a freesia and it is unmusical. sent14: if something muffs urodele and it is architectural it is not lexicographic.
sent4 -> int1: the beebalm does muff urodele.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beebalm is architectural.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the beebalm does muff urodele and is architectural.; sent14 -> int3: the beebalm is not lexicographic if it muffs urodele and is architectural.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the beebalm is not lexicographic.; sent9 & sent8 -> int5: the beebalm is lexicographic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the beebalm is not architectural.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the afghan is a kind of a klaxon and is architectural is true.
sent3 -> int8: if the afghan does not muff urodele then the fact that it is a klaxon and is architectural is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the afghan is a klaxon and architectural. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the beebalm is not unmusical hold. sent2: the demister does not muff urodele. sent3: if something does not muff urodele it is both a klaxon and architectural. sent4: the beebalm does muff urodele and it is a kind of a sectarian. sent5: the beebalm is a klaxon. sent6: if the beebalm is not architectural the fact that the afghan is a kind of a klaxon that is architectural does not hold. sent7: the hatchery is not a kind of a sectarian. sent8: the beebalm is non-freesia and it is not unmusical. sent9: if the beebalm is both not freesia and not unmusical then it is lexicographic. sent10: if something that muffs urodele is a sallet then it is not bacteroidal. sent11: if the afghan is architectural but it is not a klaxon it is unmusical. sent12: the beebalm is a sectarian. sent13: the beebalm is lexicographic if it is not a kind of a freesia and it is unmusical. sent14: if something muffs urodele and it is architectural it is not lexicographic. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the beebalm does muff urodele.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beebalm is architectural.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the beebalm does muff urodele and is architectural.; sent14 -> int3: the beebalm is not lexicographic if it muffs urodele and is architectural.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the beebalm is not lexicographic.; sent9 & sent8 -> int5: the beebalm is lexicographic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the beebalm is not architectural.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__