there exists something such that if it does brooch Strix then the fact that it is not a acetal and is not a Bahai does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a billionaire then that it does not direct farce and it is not exterior does not hold. sent2: if the goatsucker brooches Strix it is not a acetal and it is not Bahai. sent3: if something is a kind of a deviationist that it is not a kind of a gadgetry and it is not albuminuric is not correct. sent4: the fact that that something is a kind of non-glottochronological thing that does not moderate is right is not right if it is a kind of a stillness. sent5: there is something such that if it does brooch Strix that it is a kind of a acetal and it is not a Bahai is incorrect. sent6: if something does brooch Strix then the fact that it is not a kind of a acetal and is a Bahai is not correct. sent7: that the goatsucker is a kind of a acetal but it is not Bahai is not right if it brooches Strix. sent8: the fact that if the fact that something directs prismoid is not wrong then that it does not brooch reel and is not a Wallenstein is false is correct. sent9: that something is a kind of a acetal but it is not Bahai is false if it brooches Strix. sent10: there is something such that if it brooches Strix it is not a acetal and is not a Bahai. sent11: if something brooches Strix then that it is not a acetal and is non-Bahai is incorrect. sent12: something is not a acetal and not a Bahai if it brooches Strix. sent13: that the goatsucker is not a acetal but a Bahai is wrong if it brooches Strix. sent14: that something is not a peptide and it is not a bungalow is not right if it is a Sullivan. sent15: that there is something such that if it does brooch Strix that it is not a acetal and it is Bahai is false is not false. sent16: there exists something such that if it does diminish absorptivity then that it is not a spam and it is not a claw does not hold.
sent11 -> int1: if the goatsucker does brooch Strix then that it is not a acetal and is not a Bahai is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is a deviationist is right then the fact that it is not a gadgetry and it is not albuminuric does not hold.
sent3 -> int2: the fact that the penis is not a gadgetry and it is not albuminuric is wrong if it is a kind of a deviationist.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does brooch Strix then the fact that it is not a acetal and is not a Bahai does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a billionaire then that it does not direct farce and it is not exterior does not hold. sent2: if the goatsucker brooches Strix it is not a acetal and it is not Bahai. sent3: if something is a kind of a deviationist that it is not a kind of a gadgetry and it is not albuminuric is not correct. sent4: the fact that that something is a kind of non-glottochronological thing that does not moderate is right is not right if it is a kind of a stillness. sent5: there is something such that if it does brooch Strix that it is a kind of a acetal and it is not a Bahai is incorrect. sent6: if something does brooch Strix then the fact that it is not a kind of a acetal and is a Bahai is not correct. sent7: that the goatsucker is a kind of a acetal but it is not Bahai is not right if it brooches Strix. sent8: the fact that if the fact that something directs prismoid is not wrong then that it does not brooch reel and is not a Wallenstein is false is correct. sent9: that something is a kind of a acetal but it is not Bahai is false if it brooches Strix. sent10: there is something such that if it brooches Strix it is not a acetal and is not a Bahai. sent11: if something brooches Strix then that it is not a acetal and is non-Bahai is incorrect. sent12: something is not a acetal and not a Bahai if it brooches Strix. sent13: that the goatsucker is not a acetal but a Bahai is wrong if it brooches Strix. sent14: that something is not a peptide and it is not a bungalow is not right if it is a Sullivan. sent15: that there is something such that if it does brooch Strix that it is not a acetal and it is Bahai is false is not false. sent16: there exists something such that if it does diminish absorptivity then that it is not a spam and it is not a claw does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the goatsucker does brooch Strix then that it is not a acetal and is not a Bahai is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__