the allergen is not a reintroduction.
sent1: if something clanks room but it is not a kind of an amortization it is not a Winchester. sent2: the allergen does clank lunette. sent3: the gastropod is a yield. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not a muishond and it does not jockey is wrong then the cholecystokinin does crook poem. sent5: the fact that the allergen does not intussuscept is wrong. sent6: a reintroduction does intussuscept. sent7: if there is something such that it is a kind of a mooring then the saxifrage is not a kind of a Lagarostrobus. sent8: the weigher is a kind of a partridge. sent9: the room is a mooring if the gastropod is a Lepus and does not clank disrepair. sent10: if the allergen is a Philistine then it is a by-line. sent11: something does clank inflation if it crooks poem. sent12: the allergen is both a partridge and a Philistine. sent13: something that does clank inflation is a reintroduction but not a partridge. sent14: something is a kind of a Lepus but it does not clank disrepair if it is not a kind of a Winchester. sent15: the martensite is not a Philistine. sent16: something intussuscepts and is not a Philistine if it is a reintroduction. sent17: that the gastropod clanks room but it is not an amortization hold if it is a yield. sent18: that the shoulder is not a muishond and it is not a jockey is not correct if the saxifrage is not a kind of a Lagarostrobus. sent19: the allergen does crook allergen and it is radical.
sent16 -> int1: the allergen intussuscepts and is not a Philistine if it is a reintroduction.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allergen is a reintroduction.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the allergen intussuscepts but it is not a kind of a Philistine.; int2 -> int3: the allergen is not a Philistine.; sent12 -> int4: the allergen is Philistine.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the cholecystokinin is a kind of a reintroduction hold.
sent13 -> int6: if the cholecystokinin does clank inflation then it is a reintroduction and it is not a partridge.; sent11 -> int7: if the cholecystokinin does crook poem then it clanks inflation.; sent14 -> int8: if the gastropod is not a Winchester it is a kind of a Lepus and does not clank disrepair.; sent1 -> int9: the gastropod is not a kind of a Winchester if it clanks room and it is not a kind of an amortization.; sent17 & sent3 -> int10: the gastropod does clank room and is not an amortization.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the gastropod is not a Winchester.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the gastropod is a Lepus that does not clank disrepair.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: the room does moor.; int13 -> int14: something moors.; int14 & sent7 -> int15: the saxifrage is not a kind of a Lagarostrobus.; sent18 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the shoulder is not a muishond and it is not a jockey is not true.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it is not a muishond and it is not a jockey does not hold.; int17 & sent4 -> int18: the cholecystokinin does crook poem.; int7 & int18 -> int19: the fact that the cholecystokinin clanks inflation hold.; int6 & int19 -> int20: the cholecystokinin is both a reintroduction and not a partridge.; int20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the allergen is not a reintroduction. ; $context$ = sent1: if something clanks room but it is not a kind of an amortization it is not a Winchester. sent2: the allergen does clank lunette. sent3: the gastropod is a yield. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not a muishond and it does not jockey is wrong then the cholecystokinin does crook poem. sent5: the fact that the allergen does not intussuscept is wrong. sent6: a reintroduction does intussuscept. sent7: if there is something such that it is a kind of a mooring then the saxifrage is not a kind of a Lagarostrobus. sent8: the weigher is a kind of a partridge. sent9: the room is a mooring if the gastropod is a Lepus and does not clank disrepair. sent10: if the allergen is a Philistine then it is a by-line. sent11: something does clank inflation if it crooks poem. sent12: the allergen is both a partridge and a Philistine. sent13: something that does clank inflation is a reintroduction but not a partridge. sent14: something is a kind of a Lepus but it does not clank disrepair if it is not a kind of a Winchester. sent15: the martensite is not a Philistine. sent16: something intussuscepts and is not a Philistine if it is a reintroduction. sent17: that the gastropod clanks room but it is not an amortization hold if it is a yield. sent18: that the shoulder is not a muishond and it is not a jockey is not correct if the saxifrage is not a kind of a Lagarostrobus. sent19: the allergen does crook allergen and it is radical. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the allergen intussuscepts and is not a Philistine if it is a reintroduction.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allergen is a reintroduction.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the allergen intussuscepts but it is not a kind of a Philistine.; int2 -> int3: the allergen is not a Philistine.; sent12 -> int4: the allergen is Philistine.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__