that the handling does not occur and the earthliness occurs is not right.
sent1: the fact that the harmfulness does not occur hold. sent2: the diphthongizing does not occur but the differentiating happens. sent3: the offsetting marmot occurs. sent4: the handling does not occur if either the sledding or the deticking BIN or both occurs. sent5: the familiarity occurs if the objective happens. sent6: that that the snips happens is brought about by that the viatication does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: if the offsetting marmot happens the earthliness occurs. sent8: the deticking BIN occurs if the pharyngealness does not occur. sent9: if that the harmfulness does not occur is not false the offsetting result does not occur and the integration does not occur. sent10: if the pharyngealness occurs then the powering does not occur but the integration occurs. sent11: the deticking sprouted does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pharyngealness happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: not the powering but the integration occurs.; int1 -> int2: the integration occurs.; sent9 & sent1 -> int3: the offsetting result does not occur and the integration does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the integration does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the pharyngealness does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the deticking BIN occurs.; int7 -> int8: the sledding happens and/or the deticking BIN happens.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the handling does not occur.; sent7 & sent3 -> int10: the earthliness occurs.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the handling does not occur but the earthliness occurs is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the handling does not occur and the earthliness occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the harmfulness does not occur hold. sent2: the diphthongizing does not occur but the differentiating happens. sent3: the offsetting marmot occurs. sent4: the handling does not occur if either the sledding or the deticking BIN or both occurs. sent5: the familiarity occurs if the objective happens. sent6: that that the snips happens is brought about by that the viatication does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: if the offsetting marmot happens the earthliness occurs. sent8: the deticking BIN occurs if the pharyngealness does not occur. sent9: if that the harmfulness does not occur is not false the offsetting result does not occur and the integration does not occur. sent10: if the pharyngealness occurs then the powering does not occur but the integration occurs. sent11: the deticking sprouted does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pharyngealness happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: not the powering but the integration occurs.; int1 -> int2: the integration occurs.; sent9 & sent1 -> int3: the offsetting result does not occur and the integration does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the integration does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the pharyngealness does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the deticking BIN occurs.; int7 -> int8: the sledding happens and/or the deticking BIN happens.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the handling does not occur.; sent7 & sent3 -> int10: the earthliness occurs.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__