the fact that the vaginismus is caused by the faint is not true.
sent1: the faint does not occur if the vaginismus happens. sent2: that the faint does not occur is correct if the vaginismus does not occur. sent3: the coitalness occurs if that that the fainting occurs but the vaginismus does not occur is not correct hold. sent4: if the sounding tropics does not occur the sounding prime does not occur. sent5: the non-metricness occurs if the lobularness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vaginismus does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the faint does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the faint occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the vaginismus happens.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the coitalness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the vaginismus is caused by the faint is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the faint does not occur if the vaginismus happens. sent2: that the faint does not occur is correct if the vaginismus does not occur. sent3: the coitalness occurs if that that the fainting occurs but the vaginismus does not occur is not correct hold. sent4: if the sounding tropics does not occur the sounding prime does not occur. sent5: the non-metricness occurs if the lobularness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vaginismus does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the faint does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the faint occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the vaginismus happens.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__