the loofa does weed leapfrog.
sent1: if something is collarless then it corners incorruptness. sent2: something that does not better enalapril is not a one-twelfth and does not corner Belostomatidae. sent3: the fact that the Samnite is a one-twelfth but it is not a Senorita is not right. sent4: if the fact that the loofa does not weed leapfrog and does not corner incorruptness is not right the scanning does not better enalapril. sent5: that something is not a one-twelfth and is not a Senorita does not hold if it does not better enalapril. sent6: that the loofa does weed leapfrog is not wrong if the fact that the Samnite is not a one-twelfth and it is not a Senorita is not true. sent7: if the Samnite does not better enalapril that it is a one-twelfth and it is not a Senorita is not correct. sent8: if the Samnite is a one-twelfth the loofa does weed leapfrog. sent9: the Samnite does weed leapfrog if the loofa is a kind of a one-twelfth. sent10: the Samnite does not light and does not weed supermarketer. sent11: the Samnite does not better enalapril and does not corner incorruptness.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the Samnite is not a one-twelfth and it is not a Senorita is not right is not incorrect if it does not better enalapril.; sent11 -> int2: the Samnite does not better enalapril.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Samnite is not a one-twelfth and it is not a kind of a Senorita is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the scanning is not a one-twelfth and does not corner Belostomatidae.
sent2 -> int4: the scanning is not a one-twelfth and does not corner Belostomatidae if it does not better enalapril.; sent1 -> int5: the hydrant does corner incorruptness if it is collarless.;
$hypothesis$ = the loofa does weed leapfrog. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is collarless then it corners incorruptness. sent2: something that does not better enalapril is not a one-twelfth and does not corner Belostomatidae. sent3: the fact that the Samnite is a one-twelfth but it is not a Senorita is not right. sent4: if the fact that the loofa does not weed leapfrog and does not corner incorruptness is not right the scanning does not better enalapril. sent5: that something is not a one-twelfth and is not a Senorita does not hold if it does not better enalapril. sent6: that the loofa does weed leapfrog is not wrong if the fact that the Samnite is not a one-twelfth and it is not a Senorita is not true. sent7: if the Samnite does not better enalapril that it is a one-twelfth and it is not a Senorita is not correct. sent8: if the Samnite is a one-twelfth the loofa does weed leapfrog. sent9: the Samnite does weed leapfrog if the loofa is a kind of a one-twelfth. sent10: the Samnite does not light and does not weed supermarketer. sent11: the Samnite does not better enalapril and does not corner incorruptness. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the Samnite is not a one-twelfth and it is not a Senorita is not right is not incorrect if it does not better enalapril.; sent11 -> int2: the Samnite does not better enalapril.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Samnite is not a one-twelfth and it is not a kind of a Senorita is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__