the capstone is not impartial.
sent1: the bullace either dampens or is not a kind of a static or both. sent2: the eyeful is buccal and it is a compass. sent3: the capstone is a hubcap. sent4: if there exists something such that it is both not a trawler and not non-static the capstone dampens. sent5: the fact that the eyeful is a compass hold if the annelid does compass. sent6: something is a compass if it is a kind of a trawler. sent7: the capstone is impartial if it is anthropogenetic. sent8: a non-static thing is a kind of a trawler and/or is a lyric. sent9: if the eyeful is buccal then it does lyric. sent10: the Barbadian is anthropogenetic. sent11: the eyeful is impartial if the Cossack is impartial. sent12: if the eyeful is a lyric the Cossack is not a kind of a trawler but it is a kind of a static. sent13: that if the eyeful is impartial and is a compass then the capstone is not impartial is not wrong. sent14: the annelid is not static if something dampens and/or is not a kind of a static. sent15: something is anthropogenetic if it does dampen.
sent2 -> int1: the eyeful is buccal.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the eyeful is a lyric.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the Cossack is not a trawler but it is static.; int3 -> int4: the fact that something is not a trawler but it is a static is not wrong.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the capstone dampens.; sent15 -> int6: if that the capstone dampens is not wrong it is not non-anthropogenetic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the capstone is anthropogenetic is correct.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the capstone is not impartial.
sent8 -> int8: the annelid is a trawler and/or it does lyric if it is not a static.; sent1 -> int9: something does dampen and/or it is not a static.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: the annelid is not static.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the annelid is either a trawler or a lyric or both.; sent6 -> int12: if the annelid is a trawler it is a compass.;
$hypothesis$ = the capstone is not impartial. ; $context$ = sent1: the bullace either dampens or is not a kind of a static or both. sent2: the eyeful is buccal and it is a compass. sent3: the capstone is a hubcap. sent4: if there exists something such that it is both not a trawler and not non-static the capstone dampens. sent5: the fact that the eyeful is a compass hold if the annelid does compass. sent6: something is a compass if it is a kind of a trawler. sent7: the capstone is impartial if it is anthropogenetic. sent8: a non-static thing is a kind of a trawler and/or is a lyric. sent9: if the eyeful is buccal then it does lyric. sent10: the Barbadian is anthropogenetic. sent11: the eyeful is impartial if the Cossack is impartial. sent12: if the eyeful is a lyric the Cossack is not a kind of a trawler but it is a kind of a static. sent13: that if the eyeful is impartial and is a compass then the capstone is not impartial is not wrong. sent14: the annelid is not static if something dampens and/or is not a kind of a static. sent15: something is anthropogenetic if it does dampen. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the eyeful is buccal.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the eyeful is a lyric.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the Cossack is not a trawler but it is static.; int3 -> int4: the fact that something is not a trawler but it is a static is not wrong.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the capstone dampens.; sent15 -> int6: if that the capstone dampens is not wrong it is not non-anthropogenetic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the capstone is anthropogenetic is correct.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__