if both the non-Icelandicness and the pinch occurs the tackle does not occur.
sent1: the jumping does not occur. sent2: the instrumenting frump occurs if that the modern happens hold. sent3: if both the instrumenting frump and the transfiguration happens the rappel does not occur. sent4: if the baccarat and the toll-freeness occurs the instrumenting criminology does not occur. sent5: if the relevantness happens then the tackle occurs. sent6: that not the Icelandicness but the pinch occurs is incorrect if the rappeling does not occur. sent7: if the relevantness occurs the tackling does not occur. sent8: the pinching happens. sent9: either the modernness occurs or the inconspicuousness occurs or both. sent10: the integrating BA does not occur. sent11: if the Icelandic does not occur but the pinch occurs then the tackling happens. sent12: the instrumenting frump occurs if the inconspicuousness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Icelandic does not occur and the pinching occurs.; sent9 & sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the instrumenting frump occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the transfiguration occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the instrumenting frump and the transfiguration occurs.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the rappeling does not occur.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that the Icelandic does not occur but the pinch occurs does not hold.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the transfiguration does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = if both the non-Icelandicness and the pinch occurs the tackle does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the jumping does not occur. sent2: the instrumenting frump occurs if that the modern happens hold. sent3: if both the instrumenting frump and the transfiguration happens the rappel does not occur. sent4: if the baccarat and the toll-freeness occurs the instrumenting criminology does not occur. sent5: if the relevantness happens then the tackle occurs. sent6: that not the Icelandicness but the pinch occurs is incorrect if the rappeling does not occur. sent7: if the relevantness occurs the tackling does not occur. sent8: the pinching happens. sent9: either the modernness occurs or the inconspicuousness occurs or both. sent10: the integrating BA does not occur. sent11: if the Icelandic does not occur but the pinch occurs then the tackling happens. sent12: the instrumenting frump occurs if the inconspicuousness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Icelandic does not occur and the pinching occurs.; sent9 & sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the instrumenting frump occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the transfiguration occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the instrumenting frump and the transfiguration occurs.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the rappeling does not occur.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that the Icelandic does not occur but the pinch occurs does not hold.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the transfiguration does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__