that the tinter is not a slander is right.
sent1: if the fact that that the Sodom is a kind of a piccolo and it is medullary is not right is not false that the fingertip is not medullary hold. sent2: the sour is not scalable. sent3: if there is something such that it is realistic the shellfish is a kind of fat thing that contemns latte. sent4: the Sodom does not sideline rhododendron. sent5: there is something such that it does ridicule procedure. sent6: the fact that the shellfish contemns latte is not wrong. sent7: the sour is not a Carmichael if the shellfish is not scalable and does not ridicule procedure. sent8: the shellfish contemns latte if there is something such that it is realistic. sent9: the sour is not a Carmichael if the shellfish is a kind of unscalable thing that does not contemn latte. sent10: there is something such that it is realistic. sent11: if the omission is not a Carmichael then the sour is not scalable. sent12: the omission is not a Carmichael if the shellfish does ridicule procedure. sent13: if that the shellfish is a fat or it does ridicule procedure or both is not wrong the omission is not a Carmichael. sent14: if the sour is not a kind of a Carmichael and is scalable then the tinter is not a kind of a slander. sent15: that something is fat and is not realistic is not correct if it does not contemn latte. sent16: the fact that the Sodom is a piccolo and medullary is not true if it does not sideline rhododendron. sent17: if the fingertip is not medullary then the sour does not ridicule procedure and it is not scalable. sent18: if the sour is not a Carmichael and is not scalable then the tinter is not a kind of a slander. sent19: the fact that the omission is not a Carmichael but it contemns latte is not correct if the sour does not ridicule procedure.
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the shellfish is a fat and it contemns latte.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the shellfish is fat hold.; int2 -> int3: the shellfish either is fat or does ridicule procedure or both.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the omission is not a kind of a Carmichael.;
the tinter is a slander.
sent15 -> int5: if the shellfish does not contemn latte the fact that it is a fat and it is not realistic does not hold.; sent16 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the Sodom is a piccolo and is medullary is not right.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the fingertip is not medullary.; sent17 & int7 -> int8: the sour does not ridicule procedure and is not scalable.; int8 -> int9: the sour does not ridicule procedure.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: that the omission is not a kind of a Carmichael and contemns latte is not correct.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Carmichael and it contemns latte is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the tinter is not a slander is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that that the Sodom is a kind of a piccolo and it is medullary is not right is not false that the fingertip is not medullary hold. sent2: the sour is not scalable. sent3: if there is something such that it is realistic the shellfish is a kind of fat thing that contemns latte. sent4: the Sodom does not sideline rhododendron. sent5: there is something such that it does ridicule procedure. sent6: the fact that the shellfish contemns latte is not wrong. sent7: the sour is not a Carmichael if the shellfish is not scalable and does not ridicule procedure. sent8: the shellfish contemns latte if there is something such that it is realistic. sent9: the sour is not a Carmichael if the shellfish is a kind of unscalable thing that does not contemn latte. sent10: there is something such that it is realistic. sent11: if the omission is not a Carmichael then the sour is not scalable. sent12: the omission is not a Carmichael if the shellfish does ridicule procedure. sent13: if that the shellfish is a fat or it does ridicule procedure or both is not wrong the omission is not a Carmichael. sent14: if the sour is not a kind of a Carmichael and is scalable then the tinter is not a kind of a slander. sent15: that something is fat and is not realistic is not correct if it does not contemn latte. sent16: the fact that the Sodom is a piccolo and medullary is not true if it does not sideline rhododendron. sent17: if the fingertip is not medullary then the sour does not ridicule procedure and it is not scalable. sent18: if the sour is not a Carmichael and is not scalable then the tinter is not a kind of a slander. sent19: the fact that the omission is not a Carmichael but it contemns latte is not correct if the sour does not ridicule procedure. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the shellfish is a fat and it contemns latte.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the shellfish is fat hold.; int2 -> int3: the shellfish either is fat or does ridicule procedure or both.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the omission is not a kind of a Carmichael.; __UNKNOWN__