the fact that if the suspending hieratic occurs then the snicking happens but the steal does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: that the doing does not occur triggers that the snick but not the steal happens. sent2: the cluing throbbing and the cluing overcast happens. sent3: that the do does not occur is caused by that the suspending hieratic happens and the cluing throbbing occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the suspending hieratic happens.; sent2 -> int1: the cluing throbbing happens.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the suspending hieratic occurs and the cluing throbbing happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: that the do does not occur hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the snicking but not the steal occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the suspending hieratic occurs then the snicking happens but the steal does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the doing does not occur triggers that the snick but not the steal happens. sent2: the cluing throbbing and the cluing overcast happens. sent3: that the do does not occur is caused by that the suspending hieratic happens and the cluing throbbing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the suspending hieratic happens.; sent2 -> int1: the cluing throbbing happens.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the suspending hieratic occurs and the cluing throbbing happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: that the do does not occur hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the snicking but not the steal occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__