that the statesmanlikeness does not occur is caused by that the titration and the smokiness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the purposelessness but not the meretriciousness happens is not correct. sent2: the fact that the animalization does not occur and the operativeness does not occur is not correct. sent3: the besoting universe happens. sent4: the statesmanlikeness happens if both the titration and the smokiness occurs. sent5: if the titration happens then that the purposelessness and the non-meretriciousness happens is not true. sent6: the smokiness occurs. sent7: if the deleting does not occur the statesmanlikeness happens. sent8: the fact that not the purposelessness but the meretriciousness happens is not correct if the titration occurs. sent9: the subrogating consideration does not occur if the fact that the lysogenizing Conakry does not occur and the besoting Nigerien does not occur is incorrect. sent10: the statesmanlikeness occurs. sent11: if the titration happens then the fact that both the non-purposelessness and the non-meretriciousness happens is not right. sent12: if that the non-purposelessness and the non-meretriciousness happens is not true then the deleting does not occur. sent13: the fact that both the non-purposelessness and the meretriciousness happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the titration and the smokiness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the titration does not occur is not true.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: that both the non-purposelessness and the non-meretriciousness happens is false.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the deleting does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the statesmanlikeness does not occur is caused by that the titration and the smokiness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the purposelessness but not the meretriciousness happens is not correct. sent2: the fact that the animalization does not occur and the operativeness does not occur is not correct. sent3: the besoting universe happens. sent4: the statesmanlikeness happens if both the titration and the smokiness occurs. sent5: if the titration happens then that the purposelessness and the non-meretriciousness happens is not true. sent6: the smokiness occurs. sent7: if the deleting does not occur the statesmanlikeness happens. sent8: the fact that not the purposelessness but the meretriciousness happens is not correct if the titration occurs. sent9: the subrogating consideration does not occur if the fact that the lysogenizing Conakry does not occur and the besoting Nigerien does not occur is incorrect. sent10: the statesmanlikeness occurs. sent11: if the titration happens then the fact that both the non-purposelessness and the non-meretriciousness happens is not right. sent12: if that the non-purposelessness and the non-meretriciousness happens is not true then the deleting does not occur. sent13: the fact that both the non-purposelessness and the meretriciousness happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the titration and the smokiness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the titration does not occur is not true.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: that both the non-purposelessness and the non-meretriciousness happens is false.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the deleting does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__