the hyacinth is both non-deductive and epidemiologic.
sent1: the situation is a kind of a keep if the invite emulsifies escort. sent2: if the situation does snorkel it is a keep. sent3: the FSH is discriminatory if that it is a kind of a lasher is not incorrect. sent4: the invite is not a kind of a bicentennial and it does not read if the FSH is discriminatory. sent5: the hyacinth does read. sent6: the invite is a poor if that it does not adjoin hippoboscid is not correct. sent7: that the invite is both a snorkeling and not a poor is false. sent8: the hyacinth does not emulsify escort but it is deductive if the invite is not deductive. sent9: if the fact that something is not a kind of a fifteen and is not a kind of a Bolivar does not hold it is not nonexplosive. sent10: the fact that the Bahai does not clash and it is not a kind of a read is not right. sent11: the fact that the FSH is not a keep and it is not a lasher is not right. sent12: the invite is an encephalopathy. sent13: if something is a poor it does emulsify escort. sent14: something is not epidemiologic if the fact that it does not snorkel and it is not a keep is false. sent15: the fact that the sunshine is not a snorkeling and not a keep is wrong if the situation does keep. sent16: that the FSH is discriminatory is not incorrect if the hyacinth is not discriminatory. sent17: the Berry is deductive. sent18: if the sunshine is deductive then it is a snorkeling. sent19: if something is geopolitical then it adjoins calcium-cyanamide. sent20: the hyacinth is not deductive and does not adjoin hippoboscid. sent21: if the sunshine is not epidemiologic then the hyacinth is not deductive and is epidemiologic. sent22: something does adjoin hippoboscid if it is not a bicentennial and it does not read. sent23: something is allylic if it is quantitative. sent24: that the invite keeps but it is not a bicentennial does not hold. sent25: the hyacinth is not deductive but it is discriminatory.
sent22 -> int1: if the invite is non-bicentennial thing that is not a read it does adjoin hippoboscid.; sent13 -> int2: the invite emulsifies escort if it is not non-poor.; sent14 -> int3: if that the sunshine is not a snorkeling and it does not keep is false then it is non-epidemiologic.;
$hypothesis$ = the hyacinth is both non-deductive and epidemiologic. ; $context$ = sent1: the situation is a kind of a keep if the invite emulsifies escort. sent2: if the situation does snorkel it is a keep. sent3: the FSH is discriminatory if that it is a kind of a lasher is not incorrect. sent4: the invite is not a kind of a bicentennial and it does not read if the FSH is discriminatory. sent5: the hyacinth does read. sent6: the invite is a poor if that it does not adjoin hippoboscid is not correct. sent7: that the invite is both a snorkeling and not a poor is false. sent8: the hyacinth does not emulsify escort but it is deductive if the invite is not deductive. sent9: if the fact that something is not a kind of a fifteen and is not a kind of a Bolivar does not hold it is not nonexplosive. sent10: the fact that the Bahai does not clash and it is not a kind of a read is not right. sent11: the fact that the FSH is not a keep and it is not a lasher is not right. sent12: the invite is an encephalopathy. sent13: if something is a poor it does emulsify escort. sent14: something is not epidemiologic if the fact that it does not snorkel and it is not a keep is false. sent15: the fact that the sunshine is not a snorkeling and not a keep is wrong if the situation does keep. sent16: that the FSH is discriminatory is not incorrect if the hyacinth is not discriminatory. sent17: the Berry is deductive. sent18: if the sunshine is deductive then it is a snorkeling. sent19: if something is geopolitical then it adjoins calcium-cyanamide. sent20: the hyacinth is not deductive and does not adjoin hippoboscid. sent21: if the sunshine is not epidemiologic then the hyacinth is not deductive and is epidemiologic. sent22: something does adjoin hippoboscid if it is not a bicentennial and it does not read. sent23: something is allylic if it is quantitative. sent24: that the invite keeps but it is not a bicentennial does not hold. sent25: the hyacinth is not deductive but it is discriminatory. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: if the invite is non-bicentennial thing that is not a read it does adjoin hippoboscid.; sent13 -> int2: the invite emulsifies escort if it is not non-poor.; sent14 -> int3: if that the sunshine is not a snorkeling and it does not keep is false then it is non-epidemiologic.; __UNKNOWN__