the balaclava is not an inverse.
sent1: the fact that that the fact that something is bacteriophagic and direct hold does not hold if it encircles environmentalism is correct. sent2: if the fact that the balaclava is a malmsey and/or does snow furlough is not correct then the fact that it is not bacteriophagic is true. sent3: if something does not federalize phytotoxin the balaclava does not encircle environmentalism. sent4: if something is not a kind of an inverse it is not a malmsey. sent5: there is something such that that it does federalize phytotoxin and it encircles balaclava does not hold. sent6: the balaclava is not a kind of an inverse if the pedicel is inverse and it is bacteriophagic. sent7: the syllogist does encircle environmentalism if the pedicel does encircle balaclava. sent8: the balaclava does not encircle environmentalism if there exists something such that that it federalizes phytotoxin and it does not encircle balaclava is wrong. sent9: something does encircle environmentalism if it is not bacteriophagic and it is not a Kuomintang. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it federalizes phytotoxin and it does not encircle balaclava does not hold. sent11: the balaclava is not a Kuomintang. sent12: that the pedicel is a kind of an inverse if the service is inverse hold. sent13: the fact that the balaclava is not a kind of a malmsey is not false. sent14: the balaclava is not a kind of a malmsey if it is not an inverse. sent15: if the fact that something is not an inverse is right the fact that it is a kind of a malmsey and/or snows furlough does not hold.
sent15 -> int1: if the balaclava is not inverse that it is a malmsey or it does snow furlough or both is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the balaclava is not an inverse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the balaclava is a kind of a malmsey and/or it does snow furlough is not true.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the balaclava is not bacteriophagic.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the balaclava is non-bacteriophagic thing that is not a kind of a Kuomintang.; sent9 -> int5: the balaclava does encircle environmentalism if it is not bacteriophagic and it is not a Kuomintang.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the balaclava does encircle environmentalism.; sent10 & sent8 -> int7: the balaclava does not encircle environmentalism.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the balaclava is not an inverse.
$hypothesis$ = the balaclava is not an inverse. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the fact that something is bacteriophagic and direct hold does not hold if it encircles environmentalism is correct. sent2: if the fact that the balaclava is a malmsey and/or does snow furlough is not correct then the fact that it is not bacteriophagic is true. sent3: if something does not federalize phytotoxin the balaclava does not encircle environmentalism. sent4: if something is not a kind of an inverse it is not a malmsey. sent5: there is something such that that it does federalize phytotoxin and it encircles balaclava does not hold. sent6: the balaclava is not a kind of an inverse if the pedicel is inverse and it is bacteriophagic. sent7: the syllogist does encircle environmentalism if the pedicel does encircle balaclava. sent8: the balaclava does not encircle environmentalism if there exists something such that that it federalizes phytotoxin and it does not encircle balaclava is wrong. sent9: something does encircle environmentalism if it is not bacteriophagic and it is not a Kuomintang. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it federalizes phytotoxin and it does not encircle balaclava does not hold. sent11: the balaclava is not a Kuomintang. sent12: that the pedicel is a kind of an inverse if the service is inverse hold. sent13: the fact that the balaclava is not a kind of a malmsey is not false. sent14: the balaclava is not a kind of a malmsey if it is not an inverse. sent15: if the fact that something is not an inverse is right the fact that it is a kind of a malmsey and/or snows furlough does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if the balaclava is not inverse that it is a malmsey or it does snow furlough or both is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the balaclava is not an inverse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the balaclava is a kind of a malmsey and/or it does snow furlough is not true.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the balaclava is not bacteriophagic.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the balaclava is non-bacteriophagic thing that is not a kind of a Kuomintang.; sent9 -> int5: the balaclava does encircle environmentalism if it is not bacteriophagic and it is not a Kuomintang.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the balaclava does encircle environmentalism.; sent10 & sent8 -> int7: the balaclava does not encircle environmentalism.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__