the fact that if the cygnet does not smoothen and is not non-oncological the subsection is not psychoanalytical is not right.
sent1: the subsection is not oncological if the cygnet smoothens and it is psychoanalytical. sent2: if the subsection does not smoothen and is psychoanalytical then the cygnet is oncological. sent3: if the subsection is psychoanalytical and it does smoothen the cygnet is not oncological. sent4: that the cygnet is not a kind of an excoriation hold. sent5: the waver is psychoanalytical. sent6: that the cygnet is psychoanalytical and it smoothens does not hold if the subsection is not non-oncological. sent7: if the cygnet is not oncological but it is psychoanalytical then the subsection smoothens. sent8: the fact that the subsection is psychoanalytical and it smoothens is incorrect. sent9: the nylons is not psychoanalytical. sent10: the cygnet is not ambitious. sent11: that the cygnet does not smoothen and is oncological is false if the subsection is psychoanalytical. sent12: the subsection is not oncological. sent13: that the subsection is both not oncological and psychoanalytical is incorrect if the cygnet smoothens. sent14: the fact that the cygnet is psychoanalytical and it smoothens does not hold. sent15: the cygnet is not psychoanalytical if the subsection is non-oncological thing that smoothens. sent16: the subsection does not smoothen but it is preclinical. sent17: the subsection does not smoothen. sent18: the fact that if the cygnet does smoothen that that the subsection is a kind of non-psychoanalytical thing that is oncological does not hold is not wrong is right. sent19: the cygnet does birch. sent20: if the subsection is oncological and smoothens then the cygnet is not psychoanalytical.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the subsection is psychoanalytical.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: that the cygnet does not smoothen but it is oncological is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cygnet does not smoothen and is oncological.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the subsection is not psychoanalytical.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the cygnet does not smoothen and is not non-oncological the subsection is not psychoanalytical is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the subsection is not oncological if the cygnet smoothens and it is psychoanalytical. sent2: if the subsection does not smoothen and is psychoanalytical then the cygnet is oncological. sent3: if the subsection is psychoanalytical and it does smoothen the cygnet is not oncological. sent4: that the cygnet is not a kind of an excoriation hold. sent5: the waver is psychoanalytical. sent6: that the cygnet is psychoanalytical and it smoothens does not hold if the subsection is not non-oncological. sent7: if the cygnet is not oncological but it is psychoanalytical then the subsection smoothens. sent8: the fact that the subsection is psychoanalytical and it smoothens is incorrect. sent9: the nylons is not psychoanalytical. sent10: the cygnet is not ambitious. sent11: that the cygnet does not smoothen and is oncological is false if the subsection is psychoanalytical. sent12: the subsection is not oncological. sent13: that the subsection is both not oncological and psychoanalytical is incorrect if the cygnet smoothens. sent14: the fact that the cygnet is psychoanalytical and it smoothens does not hold. sent15: the cygnet is not psychoanalytical if the subsection is non-oncological thing that smoothens. sent16: the subsection does not smoothen but it is preclinical. sent17: the subsection does not smoothen. sent18: the fact that if the cygnet does smoothen that that the subsection is a kind of non-psychoanalytical thing that is oncological does not hold is not wrong is right. sent19: the cygnet does birch. sent20: if the subsection is oncological and smoothens then the cygnet is not psychoanalytical. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the subsection is psychoanalytical.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: that the cygnet does not smoothen but it is oncological is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cygnet does not smoothen and is oncological.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the subsection is not psychoanalytical.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__