the bow-wow is not a vasovasostomy.
sent1: the bow-wow is a modern if the zeaxanthin is not non-punitive. sent2: that the glossy is not a kind of a Branchiostegidae hold. sent3: the kaon is an accelerometer. sent4: something that is not a vasovasostomy or is not inexplicable or both is modern. sent5: something is not a kind of a Meniscium if it does inherit. sent6: the fact that the mash is a kind of non-rhythmical thing that does not modernize does not hold if the falcon is not a Branchiostegidae. sent7: the zeaxanthin is both punitive and inexplicable if there is something such that it is not modern. sent8: the falcon is not a kind of a Branchiostegidae if the glossy is not a Branchiostegidae. sent9: that the kaon is not a Capetian and/or it is percussive does not hold. sent10: the bow-wow is not a kind of a vasovasostomy if the aposelene is both a modern and a puncture. sent11: if the fact that something is percussive and is not an accelerometer is false then it is Capetian. sent12: if the zeaxanthin is modern and it is punitive then the Frost is not a kind of a puncture. sent13: the zeaxanthin is not a vasovasostomy. sent14: the bow-wow is inexplicable if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a vasovasostomy. sent15: the mash is laryngeal if the fact that it is non-rhythmical thing that does not modernize is not correct. sent16: the aposelene is laryngeal. sent17: that the zeaxanthin is punitive if the kaon is not a kind of a puncture but it is inexplicable is right. sent18: if something is a kind of a Capetian then it is not a puncture and is inexplicable. sent19: if the fact that either the kaon is not a Capetian or it is percussive or both is incorrect then the zeaxanthin is not inexplicable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aposelene is not a modern.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not modern.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the zeaxanthin is punitive thing that is inexplicable is not wrong.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the zeaxanthin is inexplicable is not wrong.; sent19 & sent9 -> int4: the zeaxanthin is not inexplicable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the aposelene is a modern.;
the bow-wow is a vasovasostomy.
sent18 -> int7: the fact that if the kaon is a kind of the Capetian the kaon does not puncture and is inexplicable hold.; sent11 -> int8: the kaon is Capetian if that it is percussive but not an accelerometer is incorrect.; sent8 & sent2 -> int9: the falcon is not a Branchiostegidae.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: that the mash is not rhythmical and does not modernize does not hold.; sent15 & int10 -> int11: the mash is laryngeal.; int11 -> int12: something is laryngeal.;
$hypothesis$ = the bow-wow is not a vasovasostomy. ; $context$ = sent1: the bow-wow is a modern if the zeaxanthin is not non-punitive. sent2: that the glossy is not a kind of a Branchiostegidae hold. sent3: the kaon is an accelerometer. sent4: something that is not a vasovasostomy or is not inexplicable or both is modern. sent5: something is not a kind of a Meniscium if it does inherit. sent6: the fact that the mash is a kind of non-rhythmical thing that does not modernize does not hold if the falcon is not a Branchiostegidae. sent7: the zeaxanthin is both punitive and inexplicable if there is something such that it is not modern. sent8: the falcon is not a kind of a Branchiostegidae if the glossy is not a Branchiostegidae. sent9: that the kaon is not a Capetian and/or it is percussive does not hold. sent10: the bow-wow is not a kind of a vasovasostomy if the aposelene is both a modern and a puncture. sent11: if the fact that something is percussive and is not an accelerometer is false then it is Capetian. sent12: if the zeaxanthin is modern and it is punitive then the Frost is not a kind of a puncture. sent13: the zeaxanthin is not a vasovasostomy. sent14: the bow-wow is inexplicable if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a vasovasostomy. sent15: the mash is laryngeal if the fact that it is non-rhythmical thing that does not modernize is not correct. sent16: the aposelene is laryngeal. sent17: that the zeaxanthin is punitive if the kaon is not a kind of a puncture but it is inexplicable is right. sent18: if something is a kind of a Capetian then it is not a puncture and is inexplicable. sent19: if the fact that either the kaon is not a Capetian or it is percussive or both is incorrect then the zeaxanthin is not inexplicable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aposelene is not a modern.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not modern.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the zeaxanthin is punitive thing that is inexplicable is not wrong.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the zeaxanthin is inexplicable is not wrong.; sent19 & sent9 -> int4: the zeaxanthin is not inexplicable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the aposelene is a modern.; __UNKNOWN__