the lacquer is not a giggle and does not stoop.
sent1: that the lacquer is not cerebrospinal and it is not subtropical is true. sent2: the checkroom is a feathertop. sent3: if the checkroom is not a tumescence that that the vitrification is a kind of a tumescence and it is a sweatshop is not false is not right. sent4: the vitrification is not a stoop. sent5: if the checkroom is not linguistic then it is not a kind of a tumescence and it is not cerebrospinal. sent6: the vitrification is not cerebrospinal. sent7: the lacquer is linguistic. sent8: the fact that the vitrification is a kind of a tumescence but it is not a sweatshop does not hold if the checkroom is not a tumescence. sent9: the checkroom does single decision if it is a kind of a feathertop. sent10: the republican is not a tumescence. sent11: the vitrification is not linguistic. sent12: the vitrification is not a feathertop if the checkroom is not a tumescence. sent13: the oracle is not linguistic. sent14: the fact that the checkroom is a plop hold. sent15: if that the checkroom does single decision and does not plop is not right then the republican is not a tumescence. sent16: if the lacquer is linguistic the checkroom does not stoop. sent17: that the lacquer is a kind of non-cerebrospinal thing that is not a stoop hold. sent18: if the checkroom is linguistic and it plops it does not single decision. sent19: the checkroom is a sweatshop. sent20: the lacquer is not a giggle and is not a stoop if the republican does not giggle.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the checkroom is linguistic.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the checkroom is linguistic and a plop.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the checkroom does not single decision.; sent9 & sent2 -> int3: that the checkroom does single decision is true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the checkroom is nonlinguistic.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the checkroom is both not a tumescence and not cerebrospinal.; int6 -> int7: the checkroom is not a tumescence.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the vitrification is a tumescence but it is not a sweatshop is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the lacquer is not a giggle and does not stoop. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lacquer is not cerebrospinal and it is not subtropical is true. sent2: the checkroom is a feathertop. sent3: if the checkroom is not a tumescence that that the vitrification is a kind of a tumescence and it is a sweatshop is not false is not right. sent4: the vitrification is not a stoop. sent5: if the checkroom is not linguistic then it is not a kind of a tumescence and it is not cerebrospinal. sent6: the vitrification is not cerebrospinal. sent7: the lacquer is linguistic. sent8: the fact that the vitrification is a kind of a tumescence but it is not a sweatshop does not hold if the checkroom is not a tumescence. sent9: the checkroom does single decision if it is a kind of a feathertop. sent10: the republican is not a tumescence. sent11: the vitrification is not linguistic. sent12: the vitrification is not a feathertop if the checkroom is not a tumescence. sent13: the oracle is not linguistic. sent14: the fact that the checkroom is a plop hold. sent15: if that the checkroom does single decision and does not plop is not right then the republican is not a tumescence. sent16: if the lacquer is linguistic the checkroom does not stoop. sent17: that the lacquer is a kind of non-cerebrospinal thing that is not a stoop hold. sent18: if the checkroom is linguistic and it plops it does not single decision. sent19: the checkroom is a sweatshop. sent20: the lacquer is not a giggle and is not a stoop if the republican does not giggle. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the checkroom is linguistic.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the checkroom is linguistic and a plop.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the checkroom does not single decision.; sent9 & sent2 -> int3: that the checkroom does single decision is true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the checkroom is nonlinguistic.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the checkroom is both not a tumescence and not cerebrospinal.; int6 -> int7: the checkroom is not a tumescence.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the vitrification is a tumescence but it is not a sweatshop is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__