the chutzpanik is elegiac.
sent1: if the fact that the Muskogee is both non-dizygotic and elegiac is not true the Greek does misremember glitter. sent2: if the fact that something is elegiac and it is dizygotic is not right then it is not elegiac. sent3: if the chutzpanik is not a kind of a terazosin then the Muskogee is eradicable and does misremember Tractarianism. sent4: the chutzpanik is elegiac if something that is dizygotic misremembers glitter. sent5: the Muskogee does misremember glitter and it is eradicable. sent6: if something is eradicable that it is not dizygotic and is elegiac is not true. sent7: the Muskogee is excitable but not unsocial.
sent5 -> int1: the Muskogee does misremember glitter.;
the Greek misremembers glitter.
sent6 -> int2: the fact that the Muskogee is not dizygotic but it is elegiac is not true if it is eradicable.;
$hypothesis$ = the chutzpanik is elegiac. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Muskogee is both non-dizygotic and elegiac is not true the Greek does misremember glitter. sent2: if the fact that something is elegiac and it is dizygotic is not right then it is not elegiac. sent3: if the chutzpanik is not a kind of a terazosin then the Muskogee is eradicable and does misremember Tractarianism. sent4: the chutzpanik is elegiac if something that is dizygotic misremembers glitter. sent5: the Muskogee does misremember glitter and it is eradicable. sent6: if something is eradicable that it is not dizygotic and is elegiac is not true. sent7: the Muskogee is excitable but not unsocial. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the Muskogee does misremember glitter.; __UNKNOWN__