that the Neapolitan occurs hold.
sent1: that both the Zephyr and the Neapolitanness happens leads to that the schooling drawer does not occur. sent2: the deserving electrolyte occurs. sent3: if the infiltration occurs but the supporting does not occur the Zephyr happens. sent4: that the transactinide does not occur is brought about by that not the lunging but the locker-roomness happens. sent5: if the fact that the deserving electrolyte occurs is not incorrect not the lunging but the locker-roomness occurs. sent6: that the schooling drawer occurs and the hand-heldness happens is right. sent7: if the transactinide does not occur the infiltration occurs and the support does not occur.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: not the lunge but the locker-roomness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the transactinideness does not occur hold.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the infiltration happens but the supporting does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the Zephyr occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Neapolitan happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: both the Zephyr and the Neapolitanness happens.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the schooling drawer does not occur is correct.; sent6 -> int7: the schooling drawer happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Neapolitan occurs hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the Zephyr and the Neapolitanness happens leads to that the schooling drawer does not occur. sent2: the deserving electrolyte occurs. sent3: if the infiltration occurs but the supporting does not occur the Zephyr happens. sent4: that the transactinide does not occur is brought about by that not the lunging but the locker-roomness happens. sent5: if the fact that the deserving electrolyte occurs is not incorrect not the lunging but the locker-roomness occurs. sent6: that the schooling drawer occurs and the hand-heldness happens is right. sent7: if the transactinide does not occur the infiltration occurs and the support does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: not the lunge but the locker-roomness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the transactinideness does not occur hold.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the infiltration happens but the supporting does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the Zephyr occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Neapolitan happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: both the Zephyr and the Neapolitanness happens.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the schooling drawer does not occur is correct.; sent6 -> int7: the schooling drawer happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__