the seedsman does deactivate curium.
sent1: if the Chilean does not confederate stability then the fact that it does not cascade smash and it is semantics is wrong. sent2: if the bandicoot cascades Nigroporus or it does confederate gean or both that the curium does not cascade foreman hold. sent3: if the curium does not cascade foreman then the seedsman is a kind of a chagrin that does not cascade foreman. sent4: the gean is not a kind of a shuffle if that the fact that the Chilean does not cascade smash and it is not semantics is correct is incorrect. sent5: if the bandicoot does cascade Nigroporus then the curium does not cascade foreman. sent6: there exists something such that it is a Psophia. sent7: the gean is not a kind of a shuffle if the Chilean is semantics. sent8: if the curium does not cascade foreman the seedsman does not cascade foreman. sent9: if the fact that something does deactivate curium and is not a kind of a Psophia is false that it does not deactivate curium hold. sent10: the fact that something does not cascade smash and is semantics is wrong if it does not confederate stability. sent11: there is something such that it is a Psophia and it does confederate Chilean. sent12: something confederates Chilean. sent13: if the seedsman is a chagrin and it does cascade foreman it deactivates curium. sent14: the Chilean does not confederate stability if something is a Psophia and does confederate Chilean. sent15: the bandicoot confederates gean if the gean is not a shuffle. sent16: if something does not confederate stability then the fact that it does not cascade smash and is not semantics does not hold. sent17: something deactivates curium if it is a kind of a chagrin that does not cascade foreman. sent18: the seedsman does confederate gean and is not a chagrin if the bandicoot is not a kind of a chagrin. sent19: the seedsman does not cascade foreman. sent20: the seedsman is a shuffle and it is a kind of a Psophia if the Chilean does not confederate Chilean. sent21: if something is a chagrin and does cascade foreman then it does deactivate curium. sent22: that the Chilean does not cascade smash and is semantics does not hold.
sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the Chilean does not confederate stability.; sent16 -> int2: the fact that the Chilean does not cascade smash and it is not semantics is incorrect if it does not confederate stability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Chilean does not cascade smash and is not semantics is incorrect.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the gean is not a shuffle.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the bandicoot confederates gean.; int5 -> int6: the bandicoot does cascade Nigroporus or does confederate gean or both.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the fact that the curium does not cascade foreman is not incorrect.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the seedsman is a kind of a chagrin but it does not cascade foreman.; sent17 -> int9: the seedsman does deactivate curium if it is a chagrin and it does not cascade foreman.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the seedsman does not deactivate curium.
sent9 -> int10: if that the seedsman deactivates curium but it is not a Psophia is false it does not deactivates curium.;
$hypothesis$ = the seedsman does deactivate curium. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Chilean does not confederate stability then the fact that it does not cascade smash and it is semantics is wrong. sent2: if the bandicoot cascades Nigroporus or it does confederate gean or both that the curium does not cascade foreman hold. sent3: if the curium does not cascade foreman then the seedsman is a kind of a chagrin that does not cascade foreman. sent4: the gean is not a kind of a shuffle if that the fact that the Chilean does not cascade smash and it is not semantics is correct is incorrect. sent5: if the bandicoot does cascade Nigroporus then the curium does not cascade foreman. sent6: there exists something such that it is a Psophia. sent7: the gean is not a kind of a shuffle if the Chilean is semantics. sent8: if the curium does not cascade foreman the seedsman does not cascade foreman. sent9: if the fact that something does deactivate curium and is not a kind of a Psophia is false that it does not deactivate curium hold. sent10: the fact that something does not cascade smash and is semantics is wrong if it does not confederate stability. sent11: there is something such that it is a Psophia and it does confederate Chilean. sent12: something confederates Chilean. sent13: if the seedsman is a chagrin and it does cascade foreman it deactivates curium. sent14: the Chilean does not confederate stability if something is a Psophia and does confederate Chilean. sent15: the bandicoot confederates gean if the gean is not a shuffle. sent16: if something does not confederate stability then the fact that it does not cascade smash and is not semantics does not hold. sent17: something deactivates curium if it is a kind of a chagrin that does not cascade foreman. sent18: the seedsman does confederate gean and is not a chagrin if the bandicoot is not a kind of a chagrin. sent19: the seedsman does not cascade foreman. sent20: the seedsman is a shuffle and it is a kind of a Psophia if the Chilean does not confederate Chilean. sent21: if something is a chagrin and does cascade foreman then it does deactivate curium. sent22: that the Chilean does not cascade smash and is semantics does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the Chilean does not confederate stability.; sent16 -> int2: the fact that the Chilean does not cascade smash and it is not semantics is incorrect if it does not confederate stability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Chilean does not cascade smash and is not semantics is incorrect.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the gean is not a shuffle.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the bandicoot confederates gean.; int5 -> int6: the bandicoot does cascade Nigroporus or does confederate gean or both.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the fact that the curium does not cascade foreman is not incorrect.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the seedsman is a kind of a chagrin but it does not cascade foreman.; sent17 -> int9: the seedsman does deactivate curium if it is a chagrin and it does not cascade foreman.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__