the coyote is not Muscovite.
sent1: the hayfork does stale heist. sent2: The heist does stale hayfork. sent3: the fact that the coyote is a ruminant and is most does not hold if the Teton is not a kind of an epilogue. sent4: if the coyote is a ruminant the Teton is not a kind of a Muscovite. sent5: that if that the hayfork does not stale heist and is not cryonics is incorrect then the Teton is not an epilogue hold. sent6: the sundew is not most.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hayfork does not stale heist and is not cryonics.; assump1 -> int1: the hayfork does not stale heist.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the hayfork does not stale heist and is not cryonics is not correct.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the Teton is not an epilogue.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the coyote is ruminant and it is most is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the coyote is not Muscovite. ; $context$ = sent1: the hayfork does stale heist. sent2: The heist does stale hayfork. sent3: the fact that the coyote is a ruminant and is most does not hold if the Teton is not a kind of an epilogue. sent4: if the coyote is a ruminant the Teton is not a kind of a Muscovite. sent5: that if that the hayfork does not stale heist and is not cryonics is incorrect then the Teton is not an epilogue hold. sent6: the sundew is not most. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hayfork does not stale heist and is not cryonics.; assump1 -> int1: the hayfork does not stale heist.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the hayfork does not stale heist and is not cryonics is not correct.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the Teton is not an epilogue.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the coyote is ruminant and it is most is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__