if the configurationalness happens the flaking politburo does not occur and the sediment does not occur.
sent1: the flaking politburo does not occur and the sedimenting does not occur if that the harvesting unpermissiveness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the confrontationalness does not occur if the pneumonectomy does not occur. sent3: that the configurationalness does not occur and the basicsness does not occur is brought about by the oligarchicness. sent4: that the basicsness occurs is prevented by the oligarchicness. sent5: if that the oligarchicness happens is correct then the configurationalness occurs and the basics does not occur. sent6: the oligarchicness occurs if the harvesting unpermissiveness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the configurationalness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the harvesting unpermissiveness occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the oligarchicness occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the configurationalness does not occur and the basics does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the configurationalness does not occur.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the harvesting unpermissiveness does not occur.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the flaking politburo does not occur and the sedimenting does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the configurationalness happens the flaking politburo does not occur and the sediment does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the flaking politburo does not occur and the sedimenting does not occur if that the harvesting unpermissiveness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the confrontationalness does not occur if the pneumonectomy does not occur. sent3: that the configurationalness does not occur and the basicsness does not occur is brought about by the oligarchicness. sent4: that the basicsness occurs is prevented by the oligarchicness. sent5: if that the oligarchicness happens is correct then the configurationalness occurs and the basics does not occur. sent6: the oligarchicness occurs if the harvesting unpermissiveness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the configurationalness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the harvesting unpermissiveness occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the oligarchicness occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the configurationalness does not occur and the basics does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the configurationalness does not occur.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the harvesting unpermissiveness does not occur.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the flaking politburo does not occur and the sedimenting does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__