the fact that the sticktight is not inboard and it is not insufficient is not correct.
sent1: the desideratum does not invest windmill if the fact that the dinner does not invest rockabilly and is not Moorish is wrong. sent2: the fact that that the dinner does not invest rockabilly but it is a kind of a Moorish hold does not hold. sent3: if the desideratum is not non-boronic the sticktight is not inboard. sent4: that if the dinner does not unloose cannulation that the dinner does not invest rockabilly but it is Moorish is not correct is not false. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a Lablab but it is boronic is not correct if it is delicate. sent6: the dinner does not unloose cannulation or it is not a Lablab or both. sent7: the fact that something does not invest rockabilly and it is not a kind of a Moorish is false if it does not unloose cannulation. sent8: the dinner does unloose cannulation and/or it is not a kind of a Lablab. sent9: that something is a kind of non-inboard thing that is not insufficient is not right if it does not unloose cannulation. sent10: that something does not invest rockabilly but it is a Moorish does not hold if it does not unloose cannulation. sent11: if something does not unloose cannulation then that it does invest rockabilly and is not a kind of a Moorish is incorrect. sent12: if the desideratum is not boronic then the sticktight does not unloose cannulation and does not invest windmill. sent13: if the hypobasidium does invest windmill then the fact that the desideratum is not ergonomic is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the CD4 does invest endurance hold. sent15: that something is both not a rendezvous and not a Chardonnay is not right if it does not sentimentalise. sent16: that the dinner invests rockabilly and is not a Moorish does not hold if it does not unloose cannulation. sent17: if the dimwit is a kind of a timid the sepulcher is not ergonomic. sent18: something is not Merovingian if it is ergonomic. sent19: something is boronic if that it does not invest windmill hold. sent20: the desideratum does not unloose cannulation if the fact that the hypobasidium does not unloose cannulation and invests windmill does not hold. sent21: if the dinner does not unloose cannulation and/or is not a Lablab then it does not unloose cannulation. sent22: if something is not non-ergonomic then it is not a Merovingian but delicate. sent23: the hypobasidium is not a kind of a Merovingian. sent24: the dimwit is a timid if the CD4 invests endurance. sent25: the sticktight unlooses cannulation if the desideratum does not unlooses cannulation. sent26: if the hypobasidium is not boronic but a Merovingian the sticktight is not insufficient. sent27: the sticktight is not insufficient if the hypobasidium is not Merovingian and is delicate. sent28: the hypobasidium is ergonomic.
sent7 -> int1: if the dinner does not unloose cannulation then the fact that it does not invest rockabilly and is not Moorish does not hold.; sent21 & sent6 -> int2: the dinner does not unloose cannulation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the dinner does not invest rockabilly and is not a Moorish is false.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the desideratum does not invest windmill.; sent19 -> int5: if the desideratum does not invest windmill it is boronic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the desideratum is boronic.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the sticktight is not inboard.; sent22 -> int8: the hypobasidium is non-Merovingian thing that is delicate if it is ergonomic.; int8 & sent28 -> int9: the hypobasidium is not a Merovingian but it is delicate.; sent27 & int9 -> int10: the sticktight is not insufficient.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the sticktight is not illogical and does invest rockabilly.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sticktight is not inboard and it is not insufficient is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the desideratum does not invest windmill if the fact that the dinner does not invest rockabilly and is not Moorish is wrong. sent2: the fact that that the dinner does not invest rockabilly but it is a kind of a Moorish hold does not hold. sent3: if the desideratum is not non-boronic the sticktight is not inboard. sent4: that if the dinner does not unloose cannulation that the dinner does not invest rockabilly but it is Moorish is not correct is not false. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a Lablab but it is boronic is not correct if it is delicate. sent6: the dinner does not unloose cannulation or it is not a Lablab or both. sent7: the fact that something does not invest rockabilly and it is not a kind of a Moorish is false if it does not unloose cannulation. sent8: the dinner does unloose cannulation and/or it is not a kind of a Lablab. sent9: that something is a kind of non-inboard thing that is not insufficient is not right if it does not unloose cannulation. sent10: that something does not invest rockabilly but it is a Moorish does not hold if it does not unloose cannulation. sent11: if something does not unloose cannulation then that it does invest rockabilly and is not a kind of a Moorish is incorrect. sent12: if the desideratum is not boronic then the sticktight does not unloose cannulation and does not invest windmill. sent13: if the hypobasidium does invest windmill then the fact that the desideratum is not ergonomic is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the CD4 does invest endurance hold. sent15: that something is both not a rendezvous and not a Chardonnay is not right if it does not sentimentalise. sent16: that the dinner invests rockabilly and is not a Moorish does not hold if it does not unloose cannulation. sent17: if the dimwit is a kind of a timid the sepulcher is not ergonomic. sent18: something is not Merovingian if it is ergonomic. sent19: something is boronic if that it does not invest windmill hold. sent20: the desideratum does not unloose cannulation if the fact that the hypobasidium does not unloose cannulation and invests windmill does not hold. sent21: if the dinner does not unloose cannulation and/or is not a Lablab then it does not unloose cannulation. sent22: if something is not non-ergonomic then it is not a Merovingian but delicate. sent23: the hypobasidium is not a kind of a Merovingian. sent24: the dimwit is a timid if the CD4 invests endurance. sent25: the sticktight unlooses cannulation if the desideratum does not unlooses cannulation. sent26: if the hypobasidium is not boronic but a Merovingian the sticktight is not insufficient. sent27: the sticktight is not insufficient if the hypobasidium is not Merovingian and is delicate. sent28: the hypobasidium is ergonomic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the dinner does not unloose cannulation then the fact that it does not invest rockabilly and is not Moorish does not hold.; sent21 & sent6 -> int2: the dinner does not unloose cannulation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the dinner does not invest rockabilly and is not a Moorish is false.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the desideratum does not invest windmill.; sent19 -> int5: if the desideratum does not invest windmill it is boronic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the desideratum is boronic.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the sticktight is not inboard.; sent22 -> int8: the hypobasidium is non-Merovingian thing that is delicate if it is ergonomic.; int8 & sent28 -> int9: the hypobasidium is not a Merovingian but it is delicate.; sent27 & int9 -> int10: the sticktight is not insufficient.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__