the bombsight does not wreck.
sent1: the bombsight is baccate. sent2: the bombsight is not non-baccate but monocarboxylic. sent3: the shoot is not meiotic. sent4: if there is something such that it is not Galwegian then the illustrator is not a dorsiflexion. sent5: the illustrator is a dorsiflexion if the clubhouse is a howdah. sent6: the ogee does hypnotize snowdrift and it is Galwegian. sent7: if there is something such that it is monocarboxylic a wrecked the clubhouse is a howdah. sent8: there exists something such that it is monocarboxylic. sent9: the fact that the self-induction is monocarboxylic and is a cooperative is wrong if there are cooperative things. sent10: if the fact that the clubhouse is baccate but it is not a wrecked does not hold the bombsight is not a kind of a cooperative. sent11: something is uncooperative if that it is monocarboxylic and it is an uncooperative is wrong. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is a dorsiflexion and Galwegian is incorrect then the fact that the illustrator is not a dorsiflexion is true.
sent2 -> int1: the bombsight is monocarboxylic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bombsight wrecks.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bombsight is monocarboxylic and it does wreck.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is monocarboxylic and it is a wrecked.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the clubhouse is a kind of a howdah.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the illustrator is a dorsiflexion.;
the self-induction is not a kind of a cooperative.
sent11 -> int6: if the fact that the self-induction is monocarboxylic and it is a cooperative does not hold it is not a cooperative.;
$hypothesis$ = the bombsight does not wreck. ; $context$ = sent1: the bombsight is baccate. sent2: the bombsight is not non-baccate but monocarboxylic. sent3: the shoot is not meiotic. sent4: if there is something such that it is not Galwegian then the illustrator is not a dorsiflexion. sent5: the illustrator is a dorsiflexion if the clubhouse is a howdah. sent6: the ogee does hypnotize snowdrift and it is Galwegian. sent7: if there is something such that it is monocarboxylic a wrecked the clubhouse is a howdah. sent8: there exists something such that it is monocarboxylic. sent9: the fact that the self-induction is monocarboxylic and is a cooperative is wrong if there are cooperative things. sent10: if the fact that the clubhouse is baccate but it is not a wrecked does not hold the bombsight is not a kind of a cooperative. sent11: something is uncooperative if that it is monocarboxylic and it is an uncooperative is wrong. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is a dorsiflexion and Galwegian is incorrect then the fact that the illustrator is not a dorsiflexion is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the bombsight is monocarboxylic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bombsight wrecks.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bombsight is monocarboxylic and it does wreck.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is monocarboxylic and it is a wrecked.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the clubhouse is a kind of a howdah.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the illustrator is a dorsiflexion.; __UNKNOWN__