that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a twinkle that it is a aquatics and does not protrude is incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the phyllode is a kind of aquatics thing that does not protrude is not true if the fact that it twinkles is right. sent2: the fact that the toddy is a twinkle but not a soleus does not hold if it adapts Rome. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a twinkle it is aquatics and does not protrude is not false. sent4: if the fact that the return is a mistreatment is not false the fact that it is anabolic and it does not protrude is incorrect. sent5: the shirt does adapt regosol and is not a aquatics if it does adapt ponce. sent6: if the phyllode is a kind of a twinkle then it is a aquatics and it does not protrude. sent7: that something is unstoppable thing that does not protrude is wrong if it does recover. sent8: if the phyllode twinkles that it is aquatics thing that does protrude does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a twinkle is right the fact that it is a kind of a aquatics and does protrude is wrong. sent10: if the phyllode decorates that it does adapt endoscope and it is not a kind of a commute is wrong. sent11: that something does discard but it is not a punch does not hold if it is a celebration. sent12: the fact that the phyllode is domestic but not a bonheur is false if it does adapt sulfate.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
if the phyllode recovers then the fact that it is a kind of unstoppable thing that does not protrude is incorrect.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a twinkle that it is a aquatics and does not protrude is incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the phyllode is a kind of aquatics thing that does not protrude is not true if the fact that it twinkles is right. sent2: the fact that the toddy is a twinkle but not a soleus does not hold if it adapts Rome. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a twinkle it is aquatics and does not protrude is not false. sent4: if the fact that the return is a mistreatment is not false the fact that it is anabolic and it does not protrude is incorrect. sent5: the shirt does adapt regosol and is not a aquatics if it does adapt ponce. sent6: if the phyllode is a kind of a twinkle then it is a aquatics and it does not protrude. sent7: that something is unstoppable thing that does not protrude is wrong if it does recover. sent8: if the phyllode twinkles that it is aquatics thing that does protrude does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a twinkle is right the fact that it is a kind of a aquatics and does protrude is wrong. sent10: if the phyllode decorates that it does adapt endoscope and it is not a kind of a commute is wrong. sent11: that something does discard but it is not a punch does not hold if it is a celebration. sent12: the fact that the phyllode is domestic but not a bonheur is false if it does adapt sulfate. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__