the conception is a babbler if the bier is unpropitious.
sent1: the conception is not chalky. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a Hellenism but it is not unpropitious is wrong it is a Paducah. sent3: that that the conception is unpropitious and it is a babbler is not correct is not wrong. sent4: if something is a Paducah and is not a kind of a Hellenism then the bier is not unpropitious. sent5: that the conception is a robin is not false. sent6: something starts treaty. sent7: something is underage but it is not a checkerbloom. sent8: that the stepbrother does cream Pseudoryx but it is not unpropitious is true. sent9: the conception is bubaline but it is not budgetary. sent10: if that something is a humanization but not a deficit is not true then it does decrease Isis. sent11: if the fact that something is a Paducah but it is not a kind of a Hellenism is not true then it is a babbler. sent12: the fact that the conception is a babbler and is not unpropitious is not right. sent13: the tea-strainer is a babbler. sent14: the bier is unpropitious if the fact that it is a Paducah and it is not a babbler is not correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the conception is a Paducah that is not a Hellenism.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that it is a Paducah and it is not a Hellenism.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the bier is not unpropitious.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bier is unpropitious is correct.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the conception is a Paducah and is not a Hellenism does not hold.; sent11 -> int5: if that the conception is a Paducah but it is not a Hellenism is wrong then it is a kind of a babbler.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the conception is a babbler.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the conception is a babbler if the bier is unpropitious. ; $context$ = sent1: the conception is not chalky. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a Hellenism but it is not unpropitious is wrong it is a Paducah. sent3: that that the conception is unpropitious and it is a babbler is not correct is not wrong. sent4: if something is a Paducah and is not a kind of a Hellenism then the bier is not unpropitious. sent5: that the conception is a robin is not false. sent6: something starts treaty. sent7: something is underage but it is not a checkerbloom. sent8: that the stepbrother does cream Pseudoryx but it is not unpropitious is true. sent9: the conception is bubaline but it is not budgetary. sent10: if that something is a humanization but not a deficit is not true then it does decrease Isis. sent11: if the fact that something is a Paducah but it is not a kind of a Hellenism is not true then it is a babbler. sent12: the fact that the conception is a babbler and is not unpropitious is not right. sent13: the tea-strainer is a babbler. sent14: the bier is unpropitious if the fact that it is a Paducah and it is not a babbler is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the conception is a Paducah that is not a Hellenism.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that it is a Paducah and it is not a Hellenism.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the bier is not unpropitious.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bier is unpropitious is correct.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the conception is a Paducah and is not a Hellenism does not hold.; sent11 -> int5: if that the conception is a Paducah but it is not a Hellenism is wrong then it is a kind of a babbler.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the conception is a babbler.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__