the steam does not bow makomako.
sent1: the fact that something is frictional and is not diffusing is wrong if it does not fatten. sent2: if that the steam does not bow makomako and is a mericarp is incorrect then the polluter does not fatten. sent3: that the polluter does hesitate or is a kind of a Broglie or both is true. sent4: the polluter is not a cleaning if it does hesitate or is a Broglie or both. sent5: if something diffuses then it does bow makomako.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the steam does not bow makomako but it is a kind of a mericarp is incorrect.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the polluter does not fatten.; sent1 -> int2: if the polluter does not fatten then the fact that it is frictional and does not diffuse is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the polluter is frictional but it does not diffuse is false.; sent4 & sent3 -> int4: the polluter is not cleaning.;
the steam does bow makomako.
sent5 -> int5: if the steam does diffuse then it does bow makomako.;
$hypothesis$ = the steam does not bow makomako. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is frictional and is not diffusing is wrong if it does not fatten. sent2: if that the steam does not bow makomako and is a mericarp is incorrect then the polluter does not fatten. sent3: that the polluter does hesitate or is a kind of a Broglie or both is true. sent4: the polluter is not a cleaning if it does hesitate or is a Broglie or both. sent5: if something diffuses then it does bow makomako. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the steam does not bow makomako but it is a kind of a mericarp is incorrect.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the polluter does not fatten.; sent1 -> int2: if the polluter does not fatten then the fact that it is frictional and does not diffuse is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the polluter is frictional but it does not diffuse is false.; sent4 & sent3 -> int4: the polluter is not cleaning.; __UNKNOWN__