the predicativeness happens.
sent1: the ESR does not occur if the fact that either the volatileness or the recombining tree or both happens is false. sent2: that the usurpation does not occur and the ESR does not occur results in the recombining session. sent3: the vagary occurs if the fact that the recombining Vespidae but not the handstand happens does not hold. sent4: that the dorsalness and the backstop occurs causes the non-predicativeness. sent5: that the recombining Vespidae happens and the handstand does not occur is incorrect. sent6: if the usurpation does not occur then that the volatile or the recombining tree or both occurs does not hold. sent7: that the predicativeness and the vagary happens is brought about by that the recombining Vespidae does not occur. sent8: the backstopping occurs. sent9: that the bronchospasm does not occur hold. sent10: the ESR happens if the vagary happens. sent11: if the usurpation happens then the dorsalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the usurpation does not occur is not incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the volatileness occurs or the recombining tree happens or both is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ESR does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int3: the vagary happens.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the ESR happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the usurpation occurs.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: that the dorsalness happens is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: both the dorsalness and the backstop happens.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the recombining session occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the predicativeness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the ESR does not occur if the fact that either the volatileness or the recombining tree or both happens is false. sent2: that the usurpation does not occur and the ESR does not occur results in the recombining session. sent3: the vagary occurs if the fact that the recombining Vespidae but not the handstand happens does not hold. sent4: that the dorsalness and the backstop occurs causes the non-predicativeness. sent5: that the recombining Vespidae happens and the handstand does not occur is incorrect. sent6: if the usurpation does not occur then that the volatile or the recombining tree or both occurs does not hold. sent7: that the predicativeness and the vagary happens is brought about by that the recombining Vespidae does not occur. sent8: the backstopping occurs. sent9: that the bronchospasm does not occur hold. sent10: the ESR happens if the vagary happens. sent11: if the usurpation happens then the dorsalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the usurpation does not occur is not incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the volatileness occurs or the recombining tree happens or both is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ESR does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int3: the vagary happens.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the ESR happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the usurpation occurs.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: that the dorsalness happens is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: both the dorsalness and the backstop happens.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__