the aldehyde is not a Johnny-jump-up and is not on-the-job.
sent1: that the fiberboard is not on-the-job and it is not bridgeable does not hold. sent2: everything is a helicon. sent3: if something is not a kind of a helicon it is not disloyal and it is acceptive. sent4: the aldehyde is not acceptive. sent5: that the aldehyde is not a Johnny-jump-up but it is on-the-job does not hold. sent6: if the ground-shaker is not a Johnny-jump-up then that it is not a Athyrium and does not braid patroness does not hold. sent7: that the aldehyde is non-acceptive thing that does not braid shim is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the aldehyde is a Johnny-jump-up and is not on-the-job is false. sent9: that the aldehyde is not on-the-job and is not a kind of a juvenile is not true. sent10: a patriotic and acceptive thing is not a Johnny-jump-up. sent11: that the aldehyde is not a kind of a Johnny-jump-up but it is on-the-job is incorrect if it is not acceptive. sent12: that the painting does not flame chalice and is not a kind of a dysprosium is not true if it is not megakaryocytic. sent13: if the aldehyde does not braid shim the fact that it is not monocarpic and is not a Johnny-jump-up is not true. sent14: the chalice is not acceptive. sent15: the fact that the aldehyde is a Johnny-jump-up but not on-the-job is not correct if it is not acceptive. sent16: that the aldehyde is not a Johnny-jump-up and not on-the-job does not hold if it is not acceptive.
sent16 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the aldehyde is not a Johnny-jump-up and is not on-the-job.
sent10 -> int1: if the aldehyde is not disloyal but it is acceptive then the fact that it is not a Johnny-jump-up is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: if the aldehyde is not a kind of a helicon then it is not disloyal and is acceptive.;
$hypothesis$ = the aldehyde is not a Johnny-jump-up and is not on-the-job. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fiberboard is not on-the-job and it is not bridgeable does not hold. sent2: everything is a helicon. sent3: if something is not a kind of a helicon it is not disloyal and it is acceptive. sent4: the aldehyde is not acceptive. sent5: that the aldehyde is not a Johnny-jump-up but it is on-the-job does not hold. sent6: if the ground-shaker is not a Johnny-jump-up then that it is not a Athyrium and does not braid patroness does not hold. sent7: that the aldehyde is non-acceptive thing that does not braid shim is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the aldehyde is a Johnny-jump-up and is not on-the-job is false. sent9: that the aldehyde is not on-the-job and is not a kind of a juvenile is not true. sent10: a patriotic and acceptive thing is not a Johnny-jump-up. sent11: that the aldehyde is not a kind of a Johnny-jump-up but it is on-the-job is incorrect if it is not acceptive. sent12: that the painting does not flame chalice and is not a kind of a dysprosium is not true if it is not megakaryocytic. sent13: if the aldehyde does not braid shim the fact that it is not monocarpic and is not a Johnny-jump-up is not true. sent14: the chalice is not acceptive. sent15: the fact that the aldehyde is a Johnny-jump-up but not on-the-job is not correct if it is not acceptive. sent16: that the aldehyde is not a Johnny-jump-up and not on-the-job does not hold if it is not acceptive. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__