the chlorophyll is antiapartheid.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is telegraphic and it is not a netting is wrong the snowball is not telegraphic. sent2: something does not excel Eisenstaedt if the fact that it excel Eisenstaedt and is not a Darwinian is not correct. sent3: if there exists something such that it excels Eisenstaedt the fact that the shiksa does not excels Eisenstaedt and is not microsomal is incorrect. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it coheres daub and is arthromeric is not correct the caravan is not antiapartheid. sent5: if the labor does not heft addressed and is a kind of a Darwinian then the chlorophyll is not antiapartheid. sent6: the fact that if the snowball is a kind of a Darwinian then the labor does not heft addressed but it is a kind of a Darwinian is right. sent7: if the basilica does not cohere skywalk then the fact that the labor is both telegraphic and not a netting is not correct. sent8: if the Pollack does not heft over the snowball heft over and does not excel Eisenstaedt. sent9: if that something does not excel Eisenstaedt and it is non-microsomal is not right then it does not heft over. sent10: something that either does not heft over or is not non-microsomal or both is antiapartheid. sent11: the creole is a Saxon and it is a Petrarch if it does not heft arced. sent12: the Pollack is not unworldly and/or it is not a kind of a Panthera if the snowball is not telegraphic. sent13: if the Pollack is not unworldly and/or is not a Panthera the WLAN is not a motmot. sent14: the Pollack does not heft over if the caravan defervesces and is not statistical. sent15: if that the fact that the WLAN is arthromeric and does not cohere daub is true is not correct the caravan cohere daub. sent16: that something is not non-arthromeric and does not cohere daub is false if it is not a motmot. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it coheres daub and is arthromeric is not right. sent18: if the fact that something hefts over and it is antiapartheid is true the fact that it does heft addressed is not false. sent19: if something does not heft over it is not a tonnage and hefts addressed. sent20: if something hefts addressed then that it does excel Eisenstaedt and it is not a kind of a Darwinian is not correct. sent21: the basilica does not cohere skywalk if something is Saxon and is a kind of a Petrarch. sent22: something does heft addressed if it coheres daub. sent23: if something does heft over but it does not excel Eisenstaedt then it is a Darwinian. sent24: the WLAN is microsomal and coheres daub. sent25: the WLAN is not microsomal if that the caravan defervesces and is not statistical is wrong. sent26: the creole does not heft arced.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the caravan does defervesce but it is not statistical is incorrect.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the WLAN is not microsomal.; sent24 -> int2: the fact that the WLAN is microsomal is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the caravan does defervesce but it is not statistical.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the fact that the Pollack does not heft over is right.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the snowball does heft over but it does not excel Eisenstaedt.; sent23 -> int7: the snowball is Darwinian if it does heft over and it does not excel Eisenstaedt.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the snowball is Darwinian.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the labor does not heft addressed but it is a kind of a Darwinian.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the chlorophyll is antiapartheid.
sent10 -> int10: the chlorophyll is antiapartheid if it does not heft over and/or it is microsomal.; sent2 -> int11: if the fact that the caravan does excel Eisenstaedt and is not a Darwinian does not hold it does not excel Eisenstaedt.; sent20 -> int12: if the caravan hefts addressed the fact that it excels Eisenstaedt and it is not Darwinian is not true.; sent22 -> int13: the caravan does heft addressed if it does cohere daub.; sent16 -> int14: if the WLAN is not a motmot then the fact that it is arthromeric and it does not cohere daub is wrong.; sent11 & sent26 -> int15: the creole is Saxon and it is a kind of a Petrarch.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is a kind of Saxon a Petrarch.; int16 & sent21 -> int17: the basilica does not cohere skywalk.; sent7 & int17 -> int18: that the labor is telegraphic but it is not netting is not true.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that that it is both telegraphic and non-netting is false.; int19 & sent1 -> int20: the fact that the snowball is not telegraphic is right.; sent12 & int20 -> int21: either the Pollack is not unworldly or it is not a Panthera or both.; sent13 & int21 -> int22: the WLAN is not a motmot.; int14 & int22 -> int23: the fact that the WLAN is arthromeric thing that does not cohere daub is not true.; sent15 & int23 -> int24: the caravan does cohere daub.; int13 & int24 -> int25: the caravan does heft addressed.; int12 & int25 -> int26: that the caravan does excel Eisenstaedt but it is not a Darwinian is not right.; int11 & int26 -> int27: the caravan does not excel Eisenstaedt.; int27 -> int28: there is something such that it does not excel Eisenstaedt.;
$hypothesis$ = the chlorophyll is antiapartheid. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is telegraphic and it is not a netting is wrong the snowball is not telegraphic. sent2: something does not excel Eisenstaedt if the fact that it excel Eisenstaedt and is not a Darwinian is not correct. sent3: if there exists something such that it excels Eisenstaedt the fact that the shiksa does not excels Eisenstaedt and is not microsomal is incorrect. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it coheres daub and is arthromeric is not correct the caravan is not antiapartheid. sent5: if the labor does not heft addressed and is a kind of a Darwinian then the chlorophyll is not antiapartheid. sent6: the fact that if the snowball is a kind of a Darwinian then the labor does not heft addressed but it is a kind of a Darwinian is right. sent7: if the basilica does not cohere skywalk then the fact that the labor is both telegraphic and not a netting is not correct. sent8: if the Pollack does not heft over the snowball heft over and does not excel Eisenstaedt. sent9: if that something does not excel Eisenstaedt and it is non-microsomal is not right then it does not heft over. sent10: something that either does not heft over or is not non-microsomal or both is antiapartheid. sent11: the creole is a Saxon and it is a Petrarch if it does not heft arced. sent12: the Pollack is not unworldly and/or it is not a kind of a Panthera if the snowball is not telegraphic. sent13: if the Pollack is not unworldly and/or is not a Panthera the WLAN is not a motmot. sent14: the Pollack does not heft over if the caravan defervesces and is not statistical. sent15: if that the fact that the WLAN is arthromeric and does not cohere daub is true is not correct the caravan cohere daub. sent16: that something is not non-arthromeric and does not cohere daub is false if it is not a motmot. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it coheres daub and is arthromeric is not right. sent18: if the fact that something hefts over and it is antiapartheid is true the fact that it does heft addressed is not false. sent19: if something does not heft over it is not a tonnage and hefts addressed. sent20: if something hefts addressed then that it does excel Eisenstaedt and it is not a kind of a Darwinian is not correct. sent21: the basilica does not cohere skywalk if something is Saxon and is a kind of a Petrarch. sent22: something does heft addressed if it coheres daub. sent23: if something does heft over but it does not excel Eisenstaedt then it is a Darwinian. sent24: the WLAN is microsomal and coheres daub. sent25: the WLAN is not microsomal if that the caravan defervesces and is not statistical is wrong. sent26: the creole does not heft arced. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the caravan does defervesce but it is not statistical is incorrect.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the WLAN is not microsomal.; sent24 -> int2: the fact that the WLAN is microsomal is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the caravan does defervesce but it is not statistical.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the fact that the Pollack does not heft over is right.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the snowball does heft over but it does not excel Eisenstaedt.; sent23 -> int7: the snowball is Darwinian if it does heft over and it does not excel Eisenstaedt.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the snowball is Darwinian.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the labor does not heft addressed but it is a kind of a Darwinian.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__