that both the fibrillation and the sportiveness happens is triggered by that the sacramentalness does not occur.
sent1: the isolating occurs if the non-mainness or the isolating or both occurs. sent2: the fact that the breaking occurs is not incorrect if the cladness occurs. sent3: the pottering happens. sent4: the fibrillation happens and the sportiveness occurs if the sacramentalness occurs. sent5: that the comforting does not occur triggers that the mainness does not occur and/or the isolating occurs. sent6: either the amelioration occurs or the unchangeableness does not occur or both if the breaking happens. sent7: the smocking epidiascope happens and the smooth happens. sent8: that both the dilapidating Jakobson and the smocking daisybush happens is triggered by that the exchangeableness does not occur. sent9: either the pottering happens or the fibrillation does not occur or both if the boisterousness occurs. sent10: the dilapidating stoop occurs. sent11: the impressionistness is prevented by that the non-sportiveness and the non-sacramentalness happens. sent12: if the isolating happens then not the sacramentalness but the entreaty occurs. sent13: that the cladness happens is not false if the smocking epidiascope happens. sent14: if the fibrillation does not occur the dissuasion and the sportiveness occurs. sent15: the fact that the Hispaniolanness does not occur and the comforting does not occur is correct. sent16: the boisterousness occurs if the amelioration occurs. sent17: the non-sportiveness brings about the sacramentalness. sent18: if the boisterousness does not occur the fibrillation and the potter happens. sent19: if the boisterousness does not occur then the pottering occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sportiveness does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the sacramentalness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sacramentalness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the sportiveness happens.;
both the entreaty and the dissuasion occurs.
sent15 -> int4: that the comfort does not occur hold.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: either the non-mainness or the isolating or both occurs.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the isolating occurs.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: both the non-sacramentalness and the entreaty occurs.; int7 -> int8: that the entreaty occurs is correct.; sent7 -> int9: the smocking epidiascope happens.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the cladness happens.; sent2 & int10 -> int11: the breaking happens.; sent6 & int11 -> int12: the amelioration occurs or the unchangeableness does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that both the fibrillation and the sportiveness happens is triggered by that the sacramentalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the isolating occurs if the non-mainness or the isolating or both occurs. sent2: the fact that the breaking occurs is not incorrect if the cladness occurs. sent3: the pottering happens. sent4: the fibrillation happens and the sportiveness occurs if the sacramentalness occurs. sent5: that the comforting does not occur triggers that the mainness does not occur and/or the isolating occurs. sent6: either the amelioration occurs or the unchangeableness does not occur or both if the breaking happens. sent7: the smocking epidiascope happens and the smooth happens. sent8: that both the dilapidating Jakobson and the smocking daisybush happens is triggered by that the exchangeableness does not occur. sent9: either the pottering happens or the fibrillation does not occur or both if the boisterousness occurs. sent10: the dilapidating stoop occurs. sent11: the impressionistness is prevented by that the non-sportiveness and the non-sacramentalness happens. sent12: if the isolating happens then not the sacramentalness but the entreaty occurs. sent13: that the cladness happens is not false if the smocking epidiascope happens. sent14: if the fibrillation does not occur the dissuasion and the sportiveness occurs. sent15: the fact that the Hispaniolanness does not occur and the comforting does not occur is correct. sent16: the boisterousness occurs if the amelioration occurs. sent17: the non-sportiveness brings about the sacramentalness. sent18: if the boisterousness does not occur the fibrillation and the potter happens. sent19: if the boisterousness does not occur then the pottering occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sportiveness does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the sacramentalness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sacramentalness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the sportiveness happens.; __UNKNOWN__