the caiman is not spatial but it does import.
sent1: if something is a counterfire it is tasteless. sent2: the fact that the caiman is not spatial but it imports hold if the acidophilus does not salve predomination. sent3: if the acidophilus does not salve predomination the caiman does import. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is spatial and it is not tasteless is not right. sent5: that the combretum is chemiluminescent but it is not a kind of a blade is false. sent6: there exists something such that that it does not salve fasciculation and is chromosomal is not true. sent7: something is not a purposefulness if it is not a Pauling. sent8: the eyecup salves predomination and/or it is a counterfire if the combretum is not a purposefulness. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not salve fasciculation and is not chromosomal is wrong the nobelium is not tasteless. sent10: that something is non-spatial thing that is an imported is not true if it does salve fasciculation. sent11: if the fact that the fact that the combretum is chemiluminescent but it is not a blade hold does not hold it is not chemiluminescent. sent12: the acidophilus does not salve predomination if the nobelium is not tasteless. sent13: if the eyecup is not chromosomal then the combretum is not ulcerative but hemiparasitic. sent14: something is hemiparasitic but not ulcerative if it is tasteless. sent15: the combretum is either Caesarian or not a Pauling or both if it is not chemiluminescent. sent16: something is chromosomal if it is ulcerative. sent17: if something is Caesarian or it is not a Pauling or both then it is not a Pauling. sent18: that the combretum is a kind of non-ulcerative thing that is hemiparasitic is false. sent19: the eyecup is tasteless if the fact that it does salve predomination hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eyecup does not salve fasciculation and is not chromosomal.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the eyecup is not chromosomal hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the combretum is not ulcerative but it is hemiparasitic is right.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the eyecup does not salve fasciculation and it is not chromosomal is not true.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it does not salve fasciculation and is not chromosomal is not true.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the nobelium is not tasteless.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the acidophilus does not salve predomination.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the caiman is a kind of non-spatial an imported does not hold.
sent10 -> int8: the fact that the caiman is not spatial but it does import does not hold if it does salve fasciculation.; sent14 -> int9: if the eyecup is tasteless it is hemiparasitic and is not ulcerative.; sent7 -> int10: the combretum is not a purposefulness if that it is not a kind of a Pauling is not wrong.; sent17 -> int11: the fact that the combretum is not the Pauling if either the combretum is Caesarian or it is not a Pauling or both is not false.; sent11 & sent5 -> int12: the combretum is non-chemiluminescent.; sent15 & int12 -> int13: the combretum is Caesarian and/or not a Pauling.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the combretum is not a Pauling.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the combretum is not a purposefulness.; sent8 & int15 -> int16: that the eyecup salves predomination and/or it is a kind of a counterfire is right.; sent1 -> int17: if the eyecup is a counterfire it is tasteless.; int16 & sent19 & int17 -> int18: the eyecup is tasteless.; int9 & int18 -> int19: the eyecup is hemiparasitic but not ulcerative.; int19 -> int20: the eyecup is not ulcerative.; int20 -> int21: something is not ulcerative.;
$hypothesis$ = the caiman is not spatial but it does import. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a counterfire it is tasteless. sent2: the fact that the caiman is not spatial but it imports hold if the acidophilus does not salve predomination. sent3: if the acidophilus does not salve predomination the caiman does import. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is spatial and it is not tasteless is not right. sent5: that the combretum is chemiluminescent but it is not a kind of a blade is false. sent6: there exists something such that that it does not salve fasciculation and is chromosomal is not true. sent7: something is not a purposefulness if it is not a Pauling. sent8: the eyecup salves predomination and/or it is a counterfire if the combretum is not a purposefulness. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not salve fasciculation and is not chromosomal is wrong the nobelium is not tasteless. sent10: that something is non-spatial thing that is an imported is not true if it does salve fasciculation. sent11: if the fact that the fact that the combretum is chemiluminescent but it is not a blade hold does not hold it is not chemiluminescent. sent12: the acidophilus does not salve predomination if the nobelium is not tasteless. sent13: if the eyecup is not chromosomal then the combretum is not ulcerative but hemiparasitic. sent14: something is hemiparasitic but not ulcerative if it is tasteless. sent15: the combretum is either Caesarian or not a Pauling or both if it is not chemiluminescent. sent16: something is chromosomal if it is ulcerative. sent17: if something is Caesarian or it is not a Pauling or both then it is not a Pauling. sent18: that the combretum is a kind of non-ulcerative thing that is hemiparasitic is false. sent19: the eyecup is tasteless if the fact that it does salve predomination hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eyecup does not salve fasciculation and is not chromosomal.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the eyecup is not chromosomal hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the combretum is not ulcerative but it is hemiparasitic is right.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the eyecup does not salve fasciculation and it is not chromosomal is not true.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it does not salve fasciculation and is not chromosomal is not true.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the nobelium is not tasteless.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the acidophilus does not salve predomination.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__