the fact that there exists something such that if it is not audio-lingual and it is not a scruple then it perceives assibilation does not hold.
sent1: the novelist does sample Finn if it does not perceive CPU and it does not perceive assibilation. sent2: if the fact that the brain is audio-lingual thing that does not scruple is true it does perceive assibilation. sent3: the fact that the brain does perceive assibilation is true if it is not audio-lingual and it is a scruple. sent4: something does swamp Bioko if that it is not a goldenrod and does not perceive assibilation hold. sent5: the location perceives submediant if it is not audio-lingual and it is not eager. sent6: the brain does perceive assibilation if it is not audio-lingual and it is not a kind of a scruple. sent7: if that the brain is not audio-lingual and does not swamp caiman hold then it is a kind of a ablution. sent8: there exists something such that if it is audio-lingual but not a scruple then it does perceive assibilation. sent9: there is something such that if it is a kind of non-audio-lingual thing that is a kind of a scruple then it perceives assibilation.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the frogbit swamps Bioko if it is not a kind of a goldenrod and does not perceive assibilation.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not audio-lingual and it is not a scruple then it perceives assibilation does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the novelist does sample Finn if it does not perceive CPU and it does not perceive assibilation. sent2: if the fact that the brain is audio-lingual thing that does not scruple is true it does perceive assibilation. sent3: the fact that the brain does perceive assibilation is true if it is not audio-lingual and it is a scruple. sent4: something does swamp Bioko if that it is not a goldenrod and does not perceive assibilation hold. sent5: the location perceives submediant if it is not audio-lingual and it is not eager. sent6: the brain does perceive assibilation if it is not audio-lingual and it is not a kind of a scruple. sent7: if that the brain is not audio-lingual and does not swamp caiman hold then it is a kind of a ablution. sent8: there exists something such that if it is audio-lingual but not a scruple then it does perceive assibilation. sent9: there is something such that if it is a kind of non-audio-lingual thing that is a kind of a scruple then it perceives assibilation. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__