the loquat is a province.
sent1: if there is something such that that it is not flexible and it is Platonistic does not hold the loquat is not a province. sent2: the rhesus is not dramaturgic. sent3: there is something such that it is not a guide and is a kind of a Sturnus. sent4: that the rhesus is a kind of flexible a province is not correct if something is not Platonistic. sent5: if there exists something such that it is flexible then the rhesus does not default Epstein. sent6: something is not flexible but it is a province. sent7: if something is flexible then it does not respect Mammutidae and is a province. sent8: that the loquat is a kind of flexible a province is false. sent9: something is a province. sent10: the rhesus is not Platonistic if there exists something such that the fact that it is not flexible and it is a province does not hold. sent11: something is not a kind of a Housatonic. sent12: that the buffalo is not a re and is a kind of a province is not right. sent13: if something does not respect Mammutidae that the rhesus is not flexible but it is Platonistic is not right. sent14: the rhesus is not flexible if that something is leptosporangiate is right. sent15: the rhesus is not flexible if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a province and is Platonistic is wrong. sent16: that the loquat is not a Nepalese is not wrong. sent17: there is something such that it does not respect Mammutidae. sent18: the fact that something is not an aesthetic but it is inflationary does not hold if it does respect Mammutidae.
sent17 & sent13 -> int1: that the rhesus is not flexible but it is Platonistic does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not flexible and it is Platonistic does not hold.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that the fact that that it is not aesthetic and is inflationary hold does not hold.
sent18 -> int3: if the rhesus does respect Mammutidae that it is not a kind of an aesthetic and it is not non-inflationary does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the loquat is a province. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is not flexible and it is Platonistic does not hold the loquat is not a province. sent2: the rhesus is not dramaturgic. sent3: there is something such that it is not a guide and is a kind of a Sturnus. sent4: that the rhesus is a kind of flexible a province is not correct if something is not Platonistic. sent5: if there exists something such that it is flexible then the rhesus does not default Epstein. sent6: something is not flexible but it is a province. sent7: if something is flexible then it does not respect Mammutidae and is a province. sent8: that the loquat is a kind of flexible a province is false. sent9: something is a province. sent10: the rhesus is not Platonistic if there exists something such that the fact that it is not flexible and it is a province does not hold. sent11: something is not a kind of a Housatonic. sent12: that the buffalo is not a re and is a kind of a province is not right. sent13: if something does not respect Mammutidae that the rhesus is not flexible but it is Platonistic is not right. sent14: the rhesus is not flexible if that something is leptosporangiate is right. sent15: the rhesus is not flexible if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a province and is Platonistic is wrong. sent16: that the loquat is not a Nepalese is not wrong. sent17: there is something such that it does not respect Mammutidae. sent18: the fact that something is not an aesthetic but it is inflationary does not hold if it does respect Mammutidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent13 -> int1: that the rhesus is not flexible but it is Platonistic does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not flexible and it is Platonistic does not hold.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__