the fact that there is something such that it does drape chair and it does not rewrite inexpensiveness is incorrect.
sent1: if something rewrites inexpensiveness it is radioactive and does not weaken. sent2: the chair is a kind of stable thing that is not incommutable if it is shallow-draft. sent3: the fact that the chair is not shallow-draft but it is a Scopolia is false. sent4: there exists something such that it is a applecart and it drapes real. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it does rewrite dolomite and it is bloody does not hold. sent6: the fact that the fascista does not rewrite Algonquian but it rewrites dolomite does not hold if the meatus is not Polish. sent7: the chair does drape chair. sent8: if the meatus does not rewrite inexpensiveness the chair does drape chair. sent9: if the meatus does not rewrite inexpensiveness the chair does drape chair and does not rewrite inexpensiveness. sent10: something does drape chair if it is bloody. sent11: the meatus is not a hajji if something does not bloody. sent12: the meatus is a alastrim. sent13: if the chair is a kind of a hajji that it does rewrite inexpensiveness is not wrong. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it does not rewrite inexpensiveness and is a kind of a hajji is false. sent15: something does not rewrite dolomite but it does bloody. sent16: if the fact that something does not rewrite Algonquian and rewrites dolomite is not true it bloodies. sent17: the chair is not a hajji if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does not rewrite inexpensiveness and drapes chair is not wrong is not right. sent18: there exists something such that that it does not rewrite dolomite and it does bloody is not right. sent19: if the meatus does rewrite inexpensiveness the fact that it is a hajji is not false. sent20: if the chair is both stable and not incommutable the meatus is not a Polish. sent21: the meatus is not a kind of a hajji if there exists something such that the fact that it does not rewrite dolomite and it does bloody does not hold. sent22: the chair is shallow-draft if the fact that it is non-shallow-draft a Scopolia is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meatus does rewrite inexpensiveness.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the meatus is a hajji.; sent18 & sent21 -> int2: the meatus is not a hajji.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the meatus does not rewrite inexpensiveness.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the chair does drape chair but it does not rewrite inexpensiveness.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fascista is radioactive but it does not weaken.
sent1 -> int6: if the fascista does rewrite inexpensiveness it is a kind of radioactive thing that does not weaken.; sent10 -> int7: if the fascista bloodies then it drapes chair.; sent16 -> int8: if the fact that the fascista does not rewrite Algonquian and rewrites dolomite is not true it bloodies.; sent22 & sent3 -> int9: the chair is shallow-draft.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the chair is not unstable but commutable.; sent20 & int10 -> int11: the meatus is not a Polish.; sent6 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the fascista does not rewrite Algonquian but it does rewrite dolomite is not true.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the fascista bloodies.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the fascista drapes chair.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it does drape chair and it does not rewrite inexpensiveness is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something rewrites inexpensiveness it is radioactive and does not weaken. sent2: the chair is a kind of stable thing that is not incommutable if it is shallow-draft. sent3: the fact that the chair is not shallow-draft but it is a Scopolia is false. sent4: there exists something such that it is a applecart and it drapes real. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it does rewrite dolomite and it is bloody does not hold. sent6: the fact that the fascista does not rewrite Algonquian but it rewrites dolomite does not hold if the meatus is not Polish. sent7: the chair does drape chair. sent8: if the meatus does not rewrite inexpensiveness the chair does drape chair. sent9: if the meatus does not rewrite inexpensiveness the chair does drape chair and does not rewrite inexpensiveness. sent10: something does drape chair if it is bloody. sent11: the meatus is not a hajji if something does not bloody. sent12: the meatus is a alastrim. sent13: if the chair is a kind of a hajji that it does rewrite inexpensiveness is not wrong. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it does not rewrite inexpensiveness and is a kind of a hajji is false. sent15: something does not rewrite dolomite but it does bloody. sent16: if the fact that something does not rewrite Algonquian and rewrites dolomite is not true it bloodies. sent17: the chair is not a hajji if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does not rewrite inexpensiveness and drapes chair is not wrong is not right. sent18: there exists something such that that it does not rewrite dolomite and it does bloody is not right. sent19: if the meatus does rewrite inexpensiveness the fact that it is a hajji is not false. sent20: if the chair is both stable and not incommutable the meatus is not a Polish. sent21: the meatus is not a kind of a hajji if there exists something such that the fact that it does not rewrite dolomite and it does bloody does not hold. sent22: the chair is shallow-draft if the fact that it is non-shallow-draft a Scopolia is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meatus does rewrite inexpensiveness.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the meatus is a hajji.; sent18 & sent21 -> int2: the meatus is not a hajji.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the meatus does not rewrite inexpensiveness.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the chair does drape chair but it does not rewrite inexpensiveness.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__