the waterproof is a sex.
sent1: the gaskin is not a lancer and is not a Gnaphalium. sent2: something does tweeze threat if it is not a guyot. sent3: if something that is a araroba is not a coaster it does not company Virginia. sent4: the palomino does not crumble bulla and it is not a kind of a lancer. sent5: The irresoluteness does not company withdrawer. sent6: the withdrawer does not crumble bulla. sent7: the waterproof is a kind of a sex if something does crumble oligochaete and it is a lancer. sent8: the waterproof companies irresoluteness but it is not a phenolphthalein. sent9: if the fact that something is not unnoticeable is right then that it does company Virginia is not wrong. sent10: if something is not a araroba then the palomino is not a lancer. sent11: the withdrawer does not company irresoluteness. sent12: there exists something such that it is not a lancer. sent13: the waterproof is a sex if there is something such that it crumbles oligochaete and is not a lancer. sent14: that the withdrawer is not a sex is not incorrect if it does not company Virginia. sent15: if the withdrawer does not tweeze accident then it is not a kind of a fixer-upper. sent16: if the withdrawer does not company irresoluteness then it is not unnoticeable. sent17: the palomino is not a lancer. sent18: the withdrawer is a pizzeria. sent19: the palomino crumbles oligochaete but it is not a lancer if there exists something such that it is not a araroba. sent20: if the skua does not crumble oligochaete the palomino is a araroba that companies Virginia. sent21: something is a araroba.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the withdrawer is a araroba.; sent3 -> int1: the withdrawer does not company Virginia if it is a araroba but not a coaster.; sent9 -> int2: the withdrawer companies Virginia if it is not unnoticeable.; sent16 & sent11 -> int3: the withdrawer is not unnoticeable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the withdrawer does company Virginia.;
the waterproof does not sex.
$hypothesis$ = the waterproof is a sex. ; $context$ = sent1: the gaskin is not a lancer and is not a Gnaphalium. sent2: something does tweeze threat if it is not a guyot. sent3: if something that is a araroba is not a coaster it does not company Virginia. sent4: the palomino does not crumble bulla and it is not a kind of a lancer. sent5: The irresoluteness does not company withdrawer. sent6: the withdrawer does not crumble bulla. sent7: the waterproof is a kind of a sex if something does crumble oligochaete and it is a lancer. sent8: the waterproof companies irresoluteness but it is not a phenolphthalein. sent9: if the fact that something is not unnoticeable is right then that it does company Virginia is not wrong. sent10: if something is not a araroba then the palomino is not a lancer. sent11: the withdrawer does not company irresoluteness. sent12: there exists something such that it is not a lancer. sent13: the waterproof is a sex if there is something such that it crumbles oligochaete and is not a lancer. sent14: that the withdrawer is not a sex is not incorrect if it does not company Virginia. sent15: if the withdrawer does not tweeze accident then it is not a kind of a fixer-upper. sent16: if the withdrawer does not company irresoluteness then it is not unnoticeable. sent17: the palomino is not a lancer. sent18: the withdrawer is a pizzeria. sent19: the palomino crumbles oligochaete but it is not a lancer if there exists something such that it is not a araroba. sent20: if the skua does not crumble oligochaete the palomino is a araroba that companies Virginia. sent21: something is a araroba. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the withdrawer is a araroba.; sent3 -> int1: the withdrawer does not company Virginia if it is a araroba but not a coaster.; sent9 -> int2: the withdrawer companies Virginia if it is not unnoticeable.; sent16 & sent11 -> int3: the withdrawer is not unnoticeable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the withdrawer does company Virginia.; __UNKNOWN__