that the ruff is not a desk is not false.
sent1: the amalgamator is non-autogenetic. sent2: if something collogues safe it is a tamp. sent3: the amalgamator is bladdery if the bookbinder is curatorial. sent4: the fact that something does not tamp is true if the fact that it is not a desk and it is correlational does not hold. sent5: if that the ruff is not a tamp is not correct the festoon is a desk. sent6: that the bookbinder does not uproot but it is bladdery is not correct if it is not a kind of a suer. sent7: if the bookbinder does not collogue pairing then the fact that the Sazerac is not a desk but correlational is not right. sent8: the fact that the bookbinder uproots and it is bladdery is not true. sent9: the Sazerac is curatorial and is a arborvitae if the amalgamator is not autogenetic. sent10: something is a desk if the fact that it is not a suer and is not curatorial does not hold. sent11: the amalgamator is curatorial if that the bookbinder does not uproot but it is bladdery is false. sent12: if the bookbinder does uproot the amalgamator is curatorial. sent13: if the amalgamator is curatorial the festoon does collogue safe. sent14: the ruff is not a desk if the festoon either tamps or is correlational or both. sent15: something is bladdery if it does collogue safe. sent16: if the bookbinder is not a kind of a suer then that it uproots and is bladdery is wrong. sent17: that the bookbinder salutes is correct. sent18: if something that salutes is Dionysian that it does not collogue pairing is correct. sent19: that the bookbinder is not a suer hold. sent20: the bookbinder is Dionysian. sent21: the fact that the festoon does not uproot and is a tamp is not right if it is not correlational. sent22: if something that is a kind of a suer is curatorial it is not bladdery.
sent6 & sent19 -> int1: that the bookbinder does not uproot but it is bladdery is not true.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the amalgamator is curatorial is not incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the festoon does collogue safe.; sent2 -> int4: if the festoon does collogue safe the fact that it does tamp is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the festoon does tamp.; int5 -> int6: either the festoon tamps or it is correlational or both.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the Sazerac is not bladdery.
sent22 -> int7: the Sazerac is not bladdery if it is a suer and is curatorial.; sent4 -> int8: the Sazerac does not tamp if that it is both not a desk and correlational is not true.; sent18 -> int9: the bookbinder does not collogue pairing if the fact that it is a kind of a salute and is Dionysian is right.; sent17 & sent20 -> int10: the bookbinder does salute and it is Dionysian.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the bookbinder does not collogue pairing.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: that the Sazerac is not a desk and is correlational is incorrect.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the Sazerac is not a tamp.; sent9 & sent1 -> int14: the Sazerac is curatorial and a arborvitae.; int14 -> int15: the Sazerac is curatorial.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ruff is not a desk is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the amalgamator is non-autogenetic. sent2: if something collogues safe it is a tamp. sent3: the amalgamator is bladdery if the bookbinder is curatorial. sent4: the fact that something does not tamp is true if the fact that it is not a desk and it is correlational does not hold. sent5: if that the ruff is not a tamp is not correct the festoon is a desk. sent6: that the bookbinder does not uproot but it is bladdery is not correct if it is not a kind of a suer. sent7: if the bookbinder does not collogue pairing then the fact that the Sazerac is not a desk but correlational is not right. sent8: the fact that the bookbinder uproots and it is bladdery is not true. sent9: the Sazerac is curatorial and is a arborvitae if the amalgamator is not autogenetic. sent10: something is a desk if the fact that it is not a suer and is not curatorial does not hold. sent11: the amalgamator is curatorial if that the bookbinder does not uproot but it is bladdery is false. sent12: if the bookbinder does uproot the amalgamator is curatorial. sent13: if the amalgamator is curatorial the festoon does collogue safe. sent14: the ruff is not a desk if the festoon either tamps or is correlational or both. sent15: something is bladdery if it does collogue safe. sent16: if the bookbinder is not a kind of a suer then that it uproots and is bladdery is wrong. sent17: that the bookbinder salutes is correct. sent18: if something that salutes is Dionysian that it does not collogue pairing is correct. sent19: that the bookbinder is not a suer hold. sent20: the bookbinder is Dionysian. sent21: the fact that the festoon does not uproot and is a tamp is not right if it is not correlational. sent22: if something that is a kind of a suer is curatorial it is not bladdery. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent19 -> int1: that the bookbinder does not uproot but it is bladdery is not true.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the amalgamator is curatorial is not incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the festoon does collogue safe.; sent2 -> int4: if the festoon does collogue safe the fact that it does tamp is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the festoon does tamp.; int5 -> int6: either the festoon tamps or it is correlational or both.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__