that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a skivvy and is meaningless is incorrect then it is not a guzzler is not true.
sent1: the Warner is not a base if it is healthful and it is bionics. sent2: if the Warner is both a signorina and usufructuary it does not arouse data. sent3: if that something is a Tachypleus and is a broadtail is not true it is not a kind of a lysogenization. sent4: the Warner is not a guzzler if it is a skivvy and it is meaningless. sent5: there is something such that if it is not meaningless it is not a guzzler. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it arouses Diderot and eliminates document does not hold it does arouse cybersex. sent7: if that the Warner is a skivvy and it is meaningless is not correct it is not a kind of a guzzler. sent8: there exists something such that if it does overpower insolence and does arouse Diderot it does not arouse data. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a skivvy then it is not a kind of a guzzler.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Tachypleus and it is a broadtail is false then it is not a lysogenization.
sent3 -> int1: if the fact that the Balkans is a Tachypleus that is a broadtail does not hold it is not a kind of a lysogenization.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a skivvy and is meaningless is incorrect then it is not a guzzler is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the Warner is not a base if it is healthful and it is bionics. sent2: if the Warner is both a signorina and usufructuary it does not arouse data. sent3: if that something is a Tachypleus and is a broadtail is not true it is not a kind of a lysogenization. sent4: the Warner is not a guzzler if it is a skivvy and it is meaningless. sent5: there is something such that if it is not meaningless it is not a guzzler. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it arouses Diderot and eliminates document does not hold it does arouse cybersex. sent7: if that the Warner is a skivvy and it is meaningless is not correct it is not a kind of a guzzler. sent8: there exists something such that if it does overpower insolence and does arouse Diderot it does not arouse data. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a skivvy then it is not a kind of a guzzler. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__