the aquanaut is not a salad.
sent1: the arrowworm does not commit. sent2: the treat does not quirk if that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not window-shop is right. sent3: if the arrowworm quirks the aquanaut is a quirks. sent4: something is a quirk and inhales. sent5: the fact that the aquanaut is a salad hold if something that commits is not a quirk. sent6: if that something is utopian is correct the arrowworm is anoxic but it is not planktonic. sent7: there exists nothing that is both not a quirk and intelligent. sent8: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not window-shop the treat does commit and is not a kind of a quirk. sent9: that something is utopian and a salad is not right if it does not window-shop. sent10: if something that does commit does not inhale then the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does window-shop. sent11: that the aquanaut does window-shop is correct if that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not a salad is not wrong. sent12: there is something such that it is a quirk and it does not inhale. sent13: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not commit then the treat does window-shop. sent14: something is not a kind of a salad if the fact that it is utopian and it is a kind of a salad is incorrect. sent15: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is provencal. sent16: the fact that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not window-shop if the fact that that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not provencal or it does not inhale or both is incorrect is not false is true. sent17: something does not window-shop if the fact that it is a quirk hold. sent18: the arrowworm is not utopian. sent19: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not utopian the fact that the arrowworm does not inhale and/or it is not provencal is not true. sent20: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is provencal if the arrowworm is not utopian. sent21: if the arrowworm is not utopian then the fact that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not provencal or it does not inhale or both does not hold.
sent21 & sent18 -> int1: that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon either is not provencal or does not inhale or both is not correct.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not window-shop.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the treat commits and is not a quirk.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does commit and does not quirk.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the aquanaut is not a salad is not incorrect.
sent14 -> int5: the aquanaut is not a salad if the fact that it is utopian and it is a kind of a salad is not true.; sent9 -> int6: the fact that the aquanaut is utopian and it is a salad is incorrect if that it does not window-shop is true.; sent17 -> int7: if the aquanaut does quirk it does not window-shop.; sent7 -> int8: that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not a quirk and is intelligent does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is not a quirk and not unintelligent is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the aquanaut is not a salad. ; $context$ = sent1: the arrowworm does not commit. sent2: the treat does not quirk if that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not window-shop is right. sent3: if the arrowworm quirks the aquanaut is a quirks. sent4: something is a quirk and inhales. sent5: the fact that the aquanaut is a salad hold if something that commits is not a quirk. sent6: if that something is utopian is correct the arrowworm is anoxic but it is not planktonic. sent7: there exists nothing that is both not a quirk and intelligent. sent8: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not window-shop the treat does commit and is not a kind of a quirk. sent9: that something is utopian and a salad is not right if it does not window-shop. sent10: if something that does commit does not inhale then the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does window-shop. sent11: that the aquanaut does window-shop is correct if that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not a salad is not wrong. sent12: there is something such that it is a quirk and it does not inhale. sent13: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not commit then the treat does window-shop. sent14: something is not a kind of a salad if the fact that it is utopian and it is a kind of a salad is incorrect. sent15: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is provencal. sent16: the fact that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not window-shop if the fact that that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not provencal or it does not inhale or both is incorrect is not false is true. sent17: something does not window-shop if the fact that it is a quirk hold. sent18: the arrowworm is not utopian. sent19: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not utopian the fact that the arrowworm does not inhale and/or it is not provencal is not true. sent20: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is provencal if the arrowworm is not utopian. sent21: if the arrowworm is not utopian then the fact that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not provencal or it does not inhale or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent18 -> int1: that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon either is not provencal or does not inhale or both is not correct.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon does not window-shop.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the treat commits and is not a quirk.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does commit and does not quirk.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__