that the talon is zygomorphic thing that does hug Balzac is right.
sent1: something does not reciprocate caravan and is not zygomorphic if it is not lumbar. sent2: if the doliolum does snuffle friskiness the headful is a Lindbergh. sent3: if the doliolum is lumbar the headful is a Lindbergh. sent4: if the fact that something does snuffle friskiness and is not myelic is not incorrect then it is zygomorphic. sent5: that the shambles does not hug Balzac but it reciprocates matron is false. sent6: the headful is not a Lindbergh if that the shambles does not hug Balzac and it does not reciprocate matron does not hold. sent7: that the shambles does hug Balzac but it does not reciprocate matron is not true. sent8: if the shambles does not hug Balzac then that the talon is zygomorphic thing that does hug Balzac is false. sent9: that something does not snuffle friskiness but it is a Lindbergh is incorrect if it is myelic. sent10: the doliolum snuffles friskiness and/or it is lumbar. sent11: if the fact that the shambles does not snuffle friskiness and is a kind of a Lindbergh is wrong the doliolum is not lumbar.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the shambles does not hug Balzac and does not reciprocate matron is incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the headful is not a Lindbergh.; sent10 & sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the headful is a Lindbergh.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shambles does not hug Balzac and does not reciprocate matron.; int4 -> int5: the shambles does not hug Balzac.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the talon is zygomorphic and it does hug Balzac.
sent4 -> int6: if the talon does snuffle friskiness and is not myelic it is zygomorphic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the talon is zygomorphic thing that does hug Balzac is right. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not reciprocate caravan and is not zygomorphic if it is not lumbar. sent2: if the doliolum does snuffle friskiness the headful is a Lindbergh. sent3: if the doliolum is lumbar the headful is a Lindbergh. sent4: if the fact that something does snuffle friskiness and is not myelic is not incorrect then it is zygomorphic. sent5: that the shambles does not hug Balzac but it reciprocates matron is false. sent6: the headful is not a Lindbergh if that the shambles does not hug Balzac and it does not reciprocate matron does not hold. sent7: that the shambles does hug Balzac but it does not reciprocate matron is not true. sent8: if the shambles does not hug Balzac then that the talon is zygomorphic thing that does hug Balzac is false. sent9: that something does not snuffle friskiness but it is a Lindbergh is incorrect if it is myelic. sent10: the doliolum snuffles friskiness and/or it is lumbar. sent11: if the fact that the shambles does not snuffle friskiness and is a kind of a Lindbergh is wrong the doliolum is not lumbar. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the shambles does not hug Balzac and does not reciprocate matron is incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the headful is not a Lindbergh.; sent10 & sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the headful is a Lindbergh.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shambles does not hug Balzac and does not reciprocate matron.; int4 -> int5: the shambles does not hug Balzac.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__