the fact that if the sunbeam occurs that the hedging twofer does not occur and the polymericness does not occur is not incorrect does not hold.
sent1: if the courtesy happens then both the non-exactness and the debarkation happens. sent2: the fact that the non-contrapuntalness and the caulineness occurs is incorrect if the Irishness happens. sent3: the Irishness happens and the restoring agribusiness occurs if that the whirling does not occur is correct. sent4: the withdrawing happens. sent5: the restoring cyclopropane does not occur if the fact that the perceptualness does not occur and the withdrawing does not occur is not right. sent6: if the undercharging does not occur then the radioactiveness occurs and the sunbeam happens. sent7: if the fact that the fixing does not occur and the ultramicroscopicness does not occur is not correct the duster does not occur. sent8: the polymericness does not occur. sent9: if the exactness does not occur then that the perceptualness does not occur and the withdrawing does not occur is not right. sent10: if the fact that the understanding does not occur hold then that the restoring rouge occurs but the psycholinguisticness does not occur does not hold. sent11: the hedging macadamia does not occur if the fact that both the non-contrapuntalness and the caulineness happens is not right. sent12: the courtesy and the deduction happens if the hedging macadamia does not occur. sent13: if that the restoring rouge does not occur is correct then the fact that the fixing does not occur and the ultramicroscopicness does not occur does not hold. sent14: that either the hedging twofer or the polymericness or both happens hold if the restoring cyclopropane does not occur. sent15: the restoring agribusiness does not occur. sent16: that the hedging twofer occurs is prevented by that the sunbeam occurs and the undercharging occurs. sent17: the undercharging happens. sent18: the hedging houseplant does not occur. sent19: the understanding does not occur if the fact that the hedging popgun occurs and the anemographicness happens is wrong. sent20: if that both the restoring rouge and the non-psycholinguisticness occurs does not hold the restoring rouge does not occur. sent21: the klondike does not occur and the whirling does not occur if the fact that the duster does not occur is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunbeam occurs.; assump1 & sent17 -> int1: that both the sunbeam and the undercharge occurs is correct.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the hedging twofer does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the hedging twofer does not occur and the polymericness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the withdrawing and the quitting occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the sunbeam occurs that the hedging twofer does not occur and the polymericness does not occur is not incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the courtesy happens then both the non-exactness and the debarkation happens. sent2: the fact that the non-contrapuntalness and the caulineness occurs is incorrect if the Irishness happens. sent3: the Irishness happens and the restoring agribusiness occurs if that the whirling does not occur is correct. sent4: the withdrawing happens. sent5: the restoring cyclopropane does not occur if the fact that the perceptualness does not occur and the withdrawing does not occur is not right. sent6: if the undercharging does not occur then the radioactiveness occurs and the sunbeam happens. sent7: if the fact that the fixing does not occur and the ultramicroscopicness does not occur is not correct the duster does not occur. sent8: the polymericness does not occur. sent9: if the exactness does not occur then that the perceptualness does not occur and the withdrawing does not occur is not right. sent10: if the fact that the understanding does not occur hold then that the restoring rouge occurs but the psycholinguisticness does not occur does not hold. sent11: the hedging macadamia does not occur if the fact that both the non-contrapuntalness and the caulineness happens is not right. sent12: the courtesy and the deduction happens if the hedging macadamia does not occur. sent13: if that the restoring rouge does not occur is correct then the fact that the fixing does not occur and the ultramicroscopicness does not occur does not hold. sent14: that either the hedging twofer or the polymericness or both happens hold if the restoring cyclopropane does not occur. sent15: the restoring agribusiness does not occur. sent16: that the hedging twofer occurs is prevented by that the sunbeam occurs and the undercharging occurs. sent17: the undercharging happens. sent18: the hedging houseplant does not occur. sent19: the understanding does not occur if the fact that the hedging popgun occurs and the anemographicness happens is wrong. sent20: if that both the restoring rouge and the non-psycholinguisticness occurs does not hold the restoring rouge does not occur. sent21: the klondike does not occur and the whirling does not occur if the fact that the duster does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunbeam occurs.; assump1 & sent17 -> int1: that both the sunbeam and the undercharge occurs is correct.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the hedging twofer does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the hedging twofer does not occur and the polymericness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__