the altostratus is sportive.
sent1: the predator cleaves if there are multinucleate things. sent2: the napkin is a waviness if it does cleave. sent3: if the fact that the napkin is not a waviness is not incorrect either it does doctor altostratus or it is billiard or both. sent4: the fact that the predator does cleave is not incorrect. sent5: the altostratus is sportive if the predator is non-multinucleate thing that is not sportive. sent6: something is fungal. sent7: the napkin is unsalable if the fact that the predator is Arminian or it does cleave or both is false. sent8: something is unsalable. sent9: the predator cleaves and is unadaptable. sent10: the predator is a Rasmussen. sent11: that something is unadaptable if it is billiard hold. sent12: that the napkin is not a waviness is correct. sent13: if something that is not salable is unadaptable the altostratus is not sportive. sent14: the altostratus is sportive and/or it is unsalable. sent15: the fact that the napkin is not salable is right if that either the predator is a Arminian or it does not cleave or both is not true. sent16: if there is something such that it is multinucleate then the fact that the predator either is a Arminian or does not cleave or both is not true. sent17: there is something such that it is a Arminian. sent18: that the altostratus is not Arminian is not false. sent19: there exists something such that it is a waviness. sent20: the mammal is not sportive. sent21: if the fact that the predator does doctor altostratus or is not sportive or both does not hold the napkin cleaves. sent22: if there exists something such that it scrambles Reduviidae the altostratus is not mercantile. sent23: the predator is not sportive. sent24: something is unadaptable. sent25: if something doctors altostratus it is unadaptable. sent26: there are multinucleate things.
sent26 & sent16 -> int1: that the predator is Arminian and/or does not cleave is incorrect.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the napkin is unsalable hold.; sent3 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the napkin does doctor altostratus and/or is billiard hold.; sent25 -> int4: if the napkin does doctor altostratus it is unadaptable.; sent11 -> int5: the napkin is not adaptable if it is billiard.; int3 & int4 & int5 -> int6: the napkin is unadaptable.; int2 & int6 -> int7: the napkin is unsalable and it is unadaptable.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is both not salable and not adaptable.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the altostratus is not non-sportive.
$hypothesis$ = the altostratus is sportive. ; $context$ = sent1: the predator cleaves if there are multinucleate things. sent2: the napkin is a waviness if it does cleave. sent3: if the fact that the napkin is not a waviness is not incorrect either it does doctor altostratus or it is billiard or both. sent4: the fact that the predator does cleave is not incorrect. sent5: the altostratus is sportive if the predator is non-multinucleate thing that is not sportive. sent6: something is fungal. sent7: the napkin is unsalable if the fact that the predator is Arminian or it does cleave or both is false. sent8: something is unsalable. sent9: the predator cleaves and is unadaptable. sent10: the predator is a Rasmussen. sent11: that something is unadaptable if it is billiard hold. sent12: that the napkin is not a waviness is correct. sent13: if something that is not salable is unadaptable the altostratus is not sportive. sent14: the altostratus is sportive and/or it is unsalable. sent15: the fact that the napkin is not salable is right if that either the predator is a Arminian or it does not cleave or both is not true. sent16: if there is something such that it is multinucleate then the fact that the predator either is a Arminian or does not cleave or both is not true. sent17: there is something such that it is a Arminian. sent18: that the altostratus is not Arminian is not false. sent19: there exists something such that it is a waviness. sent20: the mammal is not sportive. sent21: if the fact that the predator does doctor altostratus or is not sportive or both does not hold the napkin cleaves. sent22: if there exists something such that it scrambles Reduviidae the altostratus is not mercantile. sent23: the predator is not sportive. sent24: something is unadaptable. sent25: if something doctors altostratus it is unadaptable. sent26: there are multinucleate things. ; $proof$ = 
sent26 & sent16 -> int1: that the predator is Arminian and/or does not cleave is incorrect.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the napkin is unsalable hold.; sent3 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the napkin does doctor altostratus and/or is billiard hold.; sent25 -> int4: if the napkin does doctor altostratus it is unadaptable.; sent11 -> int5: the napkin is not adaptable if it is billiard.; int3 & int4 & int5 -> int6: the napkin is unadaptable.; int2 & int6 -> int7: the napkin is unsalable and it is unadaptable.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is both not salable and not adaptable.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__