the nonjudgmentalness and the rolling gore occurs.
sent1: the baas occurs if the vaccination does not occur. sent2: the least does not occur. sent3: the rolling gore occurs. sent4: that the impairment happens prevents that the nonjudgmentalness does not occur. sent5: the opening raster happens and the kwanza does not occur if the impairment does not occur. sent6: that the kwanza and the sterilization happens is caused by that the leastness does not occur. sent7: the Coptic does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impairment does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the opening raster happens but the kwanza does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the kwanza does not occur.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: the kwanza occurs and the sterilization happens.; int3 -> int4: the kwanza occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the impairment happens.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the nonjudgmentalness occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the nonjudgmentalness and the rolling gore occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the baas occurs if the vaccination does not occur. sent2: the least does not occur. sent3: the rolling gore occurs. sent4: that the impairment happens prevents that the nonjudgmentalness does not occur. sent5: the opening raster happens and the kwanza does not occur if the impairment does not occur. sent6: that the kwanza and the sterilization happens is caused by that the leastness does not occur. sent7: the Coptic does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impairment does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the opening raster happens but the kwanza does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the kwanza does not occur.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: the kwanza occurs and the sterilization happens.; int3 -> int4: the kwanza occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the impairment happens.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the nonjudgmentalness occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__