that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a motivation and is not a life-style it is an exhibitor is wrong.
sent1: the argentinosaur is a kind of a pectoral if it is not a chordophone and it does not crow possessiveness. sent2: if the argentinosaur does not damp dysgraphia and is not monotheistic then it is a kind of a bacteriologist. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not crow vomit and it is not a kind of a Anselm then it is taxonomic. sent4: the argentinosaur is a kind of a motivation if it is not a Serer and it is not a mullioned. sent5: there is something such that if it is non-allomerous thing that is not a pectoral then it is a clinker. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a motivation and it is a life-style then it is an exhibitor. sent7: if a worldly thing is not a kind of a motivation it is a carboxyl. sent8: the argentinosaur is an exhibitor if it is a motivation and it is not a kind of a life-style. sent9: the argentinosaur is monotheistic if it is both not a collusion and not a carboxyl. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a motivation and it is not a life-style it is an exhibitor. sent11: there is something such that if it does not damp coup and it does not mummify Spartium it does crow retrospect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a throw and it does not damp LP then it is a trapezius. sent13: if the fact that the argentinosaur is not a motivation but it is a life-style is correct it is a kind of an exhibitor. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a Phoenician and does not exude then it is cubic. sent15: that the argentinosaur is an exhibitor is right if it is not a motivation and is not a kind of a life-style.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
the geordie is carboxyl if it is not unworldly and it is not a motivation.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a motivation and is not a life-style it is an exhibitor is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the argentinosaur is a kind of a pectoral if it is not a chordophone and it does not crow possessiveness. sent2: if the argentinosaur does not damp dysgraphia and is not monotheistic then it is a kind of a bacteriologist. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not crow vomit and it is not a kind of a Anselm then it is taxonomic. sent4: the argentinosaur is a kind of a motivation if it is not a Serer and it is not a mullioned. sent5: there is something such that if it is non-allomerous thing that is not a pectoral then it is a clinker. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a motivation and it is a life-style then it is an exhibitor. sent7: if a worldly thing is not a kind of a motivation it is a carboxyl. sent8: the argentinosaur is an exhibitor if it is a motivation and it is not a kind of a life-style. sent9: the argentinosaur is monotheistic if it is both not a collusion and not a carboxyl. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a motivation and it is not a life-style it is an exhibitor. sent11: there is something such that if it does not damp coup and it does not mummify Spartium it does crow retrospect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a throw and it does not damp LP then it is a trapezius. sent13: if the fact that the argentinosaur is not a motivation but it is a life-style is correct it is a kind of an exhibitor. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a Phoenician and does not exude then it is cubic. sent15: that the argentinosaur is an exhibitor is right if it is not a motivation and is not a kind of a life-style. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__