both the non-overheadness and the politicalness occurs.
sent1: the pottery and the devoicing aphrodisia happens if the reacting does not occur. sent2: that the living does not occur and the starvation does not occur prevents that the disharmonizing happens. sent3: the fact that the non-overheadness and the nonpoliticalness occurs is not right. sent4: the corroding occurs. sent5: that both the non-overheadness and the nonpoliticalness occurs results in that the pottery does not occur. sent6: if the pottery and the devoicing aphrodisia happens then the crystallizing does not occur. sent7: if the intrapulmonariness does not occur and the neocolonialism does not occur then the devoicing scattered does not occur. sent8: if that the disharmonizing does not occur hold the fact that the reacting happens but the glamorization does not occur is false. sent9: the pottery happens and the crystallizing occurs. sent10: if that that the reacting but not the glamorization happens hold does not hold that the reacting does not occur is right. sent11: the fact that the analness does not occur and the elopement does not occur is not right if the fact that the crystallizing does not occur is true. sent12: that the overhead happens and the nonpoliticalness does not occur is wrong. sent13: if the non-overheadness and the non-nonpoliticalness occurs the pottery does not occur. sent14: if both the overheadness and the politicalness occurs the pottery does not occur. sent15: the crystallizing happens. sent16: if the tactileness does not occur the liveness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-overheadness and the non-nonpoliticalness happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the pottery does not occur.; sent9 -> int2: the pottery happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the analness does not occur and the elopement does not occur is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = both the non-overheadness and the politicalness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the pottery and the devoicing aphrodisia happens if the reacting does not occur. sent2: that the living does not occur and the starvation does not occur prevents that the disharmonizing happens. sent3: the fact that the non-overheadness and the nonpoliticalness occurs is not right. sent4: the corroding occurs. sent5: that both the non-overheadness and the nonpoliticalness occurs results in that the pottery does not occur. sent6: if the pottery and the devoicing aphrodisia happens then the crystallizing does not occur. sent7: if the intrapulmonariness does not occur and the neocolonialism does not occur then the devoicing scattered does not occur. sent8: if that the disharmonizing does not occur hold the fact that the reacting happens but the glamorization does not occur is false. sent9: the pottery happens and the crystallizing occurs. sent10: if that that the reacting but not the glamorization happens hold does not hold that the reacting does not occur is right. sent11: the fact that the analness does not occur and the elopement does not occur is not right if the fact that the crystallizing does not occur is true. sent12: that the overhead happens and the nonpoliticalness does not occur is wrong. sent13: if the non-overheadness and the non-nonpoliticalness occurs the pottery does not occur. sent14: if both the overheadness and the politicalness occurs the pottery does not occur. sent15: the crystallizing happens. sent16: if the tactileness does not occur the liveness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-overheadness and the non-nonpoliticalness happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the pottery does not occur.; sent9 -> int2: the pottery happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__