the lacing Camptosorus does not occur.
sent1: that both the undiplomaticness and the fixing hair's-breadth occurs is wrong if the lacing Camptosorus does not occur. sent2: the fact that the commitment happens is correct. sent3: that the fixing hair's-breadth does not occur results in the lacing Camptosorus. sent4: the utilization happens. sent5: the neurosurgery does not occur. sent6: that the feature occurs is prevented by that both the ascending and the cenogeneticness happens. sent7: the undiplomaticness does not occur if that the undiplomaticness and the fixing hair's-breadth occurs does not hold. sent8: the fact that the fact that the parsing acne does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur hold is not correct if the fixing hair's-breadth occurs. sent9: the parsing acne does not occur. sent10: the fact that the outing does not occur and the representativeness does not occur is false. sent11: the ostomy does not occur. sent12: the ascending and the cenogeneticness occurs if the squirting does not occur. sent13: the fiducialness happens. sent14: the onymousness does not occur. sent15: that the mutafacientness does not occur is right. sent16: the squirting does not occur and the onymousness does not occur if the verbolatry does not occur. sent17: that if that the cenogeneticness happens and the feature does not occur is not right the lacing Camptosorus does not occur is correct. sent18: the inclusion occurs. sent19: the fact that the Procrusteanness does not occur and the conflagration does not occur is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fixing hair's-breadth occurs is true.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the parsing acne does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur does not hold.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the parsing acne does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fixing hair's-breadth does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the undiplomaticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the lacing Camptosorus does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the undiplomaticness and the fixing hair's-breadth occurs is wrong if the lacing Camptosorus does not occur. sent2: the fact that the commitment happens is correct. sent3: that the fixing hair's-breadth does not occur results in the lacing Camptosorus. sent4: the utilization happens. sent5: the neurosurgery does not occur. sent6: that the feature occurs is prevented by that both the ascending and the cenogeneticness happens. sent7: the undiplomaticness does not occur if that the undiplomaticness and the fixing hair's-breadth occurs does not hold. sent8: the fact that the fact that the parsing acne does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur hold is not correct if the fixing hair's-breadth occurs. sent9: the parsing acne does not occur. sent10: the fact that the outing does not occur and the representativeness does not occur is false. sent11: the ostomy does not occur. sent12: the ascending and the cenogeneticness occurs if the squirting does not occur. sent13: the fiducialness happens. sent14: the onymousness does not occur. sent15: that the mutafacientness does not occur is right. sent16: the squirting does not occur and the onymousness does not occur if the verbolatry does not occur. sent17: that if that the cenogeneticness happens and the feature does not occur is not right the lacing Camptosorus does not occur is correct. sent18: the inclusion occurs. sent19: the fact that the Procrusteanness does not occur and the conflagration does not occur is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fixing hair's-breadth occurs is true.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the parsing acne does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur does not hold.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the parsing acne does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fixing hair's-breadth does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__