the lodging does variegate Bronte and it is a dastardliness.
sent1: if that something is a poncho and is pedunculate is not right it is not a kind of a Procaviidae. sent2: if the shim does not provision and is a repeater then the bunchgrass is a Procaviidae. sent3: the trustee is not electroencephalographic and it does not disoblige lexicography. sent4: the lodging is a dastardliness and/or is a Procaviidae. sent5: if the lodging is not a dastardliness then the fact that it is a Procaviidae and it is not electroencephalographic does not hold. sent6: if the trustee does not provision then the shim disobliges lexicography and is a provision. sent7: the trustee is non-electroencephalographic thing that does not variegate Bronte. sent8: the bunchgrass is a poncho if the trustee is not a kind of a repeater and does disoblige lexicography. sent9: the syrinx is both joyous and aldehydic. sent10: if the trustee is a dastardliness and/or disobliges lexicography it is not a kind of a provision. sent11: the fact that the trustee is not a kind of a repeater and it is not a provision is wrong if the shim is not a Procaviidae. sent12: the trustee is a kind of a provision if it pits Prima. sent13: if the trustee is a kind of a provision the shim does not provision but it is a kind of a repeater. sent14: if the bunchgrass is not a dastardliness the lodging variegates Bronte and is a kind of a dastardliness. sent15: if there exists something such that it does not variegate bunchgrass then the fact that that the shim is both a poncho and not non-pedunculate hold does not hold. sent16: if either the bunchgrass is a Procaviidae or it is a poncho or both it is not a dastardliness. sent17: the lodging is a provision and it does variegate Bronte. sent18: that if that the syrinx is not a ivied and circulates is incorrect the bunchgrass does not variegate bunchgrass hold. sent19: if the syrinx is joyous that it is not a kind of a ivied and it circulates does not hold. sent20: that something does variegate Bronte and is a dastardliness is not true if the fact that it does not pit Prima is not false. sent21: if the trustee is not a repeater then the shim does provision and it is a repeater. sent22: the shim is a dropout.
the fact that the lodging variegates Bronte and is a dastardliness is incorrect.
sent20 -> int1: that the lodging does variegate Bronte and it is a kind of a dastardliness is not correct if it does not pit Prima.; sent1 -> int2: if that the shim is a poncho that is pedunculate is false it is not a Procaviidae.; sent9 -> int3: the syrinx is joyous.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: that the syrinx is not a ivied and circulates does not hold.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the bunchgrass does not variegate bunchgrass.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does not variegate bunchgrass.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: that the shim is a poncho and is pedunculate does not hold.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the shim is not a Procaviidae.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the trustee is not a kind of a repeater and is not a provision is not correct.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is not a repeater and it does not provision is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the lodging does variegate Bronte and it is a dastardliness. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a poncho and is pedunculate is not right it is not a kind of a Procaviidae. sent2: if the shim does not provision and is a repeater then the bunchgrass is a Procaviidae. sent3: the trustee is not electroencephalographic and it does not disoblige lexicography. sent4: the lodging is a dastardliness and/or is a Procaviidae. sent5: if the lodging is not a dastardliness then the fact that it is a Procaviidae and it is not electroencephalographic does not hold. sent6: if the trustee does not provision then the shim disobliges lexicography and is a provision. sent7: the trustee is non-electroencephalographic thing that does not variegate Bronte. sent8: the bunchgrass is a poncho if the trustee is not a kind of a repeater and does disoblige lexicography. sent9: the syrinx is both joyous and aldehydic. sent10: if the trustee is a dastardliness and/or disobliges lexicography it is not a kind of a provision. sent11: the fact that the trustee is not a kind of a repeater and it is not a provision is wrong if the shim is not a Procaviidae. sent12: the trustee is a kind of a provision if it pits Prima. sent13: if the trustee is a kind of a provision the shim does not provision but it is a kind of a repeater. sent14: if the bunchgrass is not a dastardliness the lodging variegates Bronte and is a kind of a dastardliness. sent15: if there exists something such that it does not variegate bunchgrass then the fact that that the shim is both a poncho and not non-pedunculate hold does not hold. sent16: if either the bunchgrass is a Procaviidae or it is a poncho or both it is not a dastardliness. sent17: the lodging is a provision and it does variegate Bronte. sent18: that if that the syrinx is not a ivied and circulates is incorrect the bunchgrass does not variegate bunchgrass hold. sent19: if the syrinx is joyous that it is not a kind of a ivied and it circulates does not hold. sent20: that something does variegate Bronte and is a dastardliness is not true if the fact that it does not pit Prima is not false. sent21: if the trustee is not a repeater then the shim does provision and it is a repeater. sent22: the shim is a dropout. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__