that there is something such that if it is not a Gardner then that it does not enter Shebat or it is not unmalicious or both is not right is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Gardner is not wrong then the fact that it either does not enter Shebat or is not unmalicious or both is false. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a Gardner then it is unmalicious. sent3: the fact that something is either not a position or not a Gardner or both is false if it is not a DS. sent4: that either the beachball is not unmalicious or it is not ratty or both does not hold if it does not enter beachball. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Gardner then that it enters Shebat and/or it is not unmalicious is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a Gardner then that it does not enter Shebat or it is unmalicious or both does not hold. sent7: the fact that if the beachball is not the Gardner then the fact that either the beachball does not enter Shebat or it is not unmalicious or both does not hold is correct. sent8: there is something such that if it does duck then the fact that it does not depressurize diffidence or it is not toroidal or both is not correct. sent9: the fact that the beachball is not a Wiesenthal and/or it is not a kinglet does not hold if it is not a neurobiology. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a Gardner it enters Shebat. sent11: if the beachball is a Gardner that it does not enter Shebat and/or is not unmalicious does not hold. sent12: the beachball is not a Gothic and/or it is not a kind of a Serbian if it does not credit equivocation. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a lutefisk then the fact that it does not depressurize locator or it is not a kind of a submarine or both is not right. sent14: the fact that something does not foster or is not nasty or both does not hold if it is not allopatric. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Gardner then it does not enter Shebat and/or is not unmalicious. sent16: there exists something such that if that it does not credit Goa is right then it is gregarious. sent17: there is something such that if it is not uncritical the fact that it is not a kind of a redberry and/or is not a disinterestedness is incorrect. sent18: if the beachball is not a kind of a Gardner then the fact that it does not enter Shebat and/or is not unmalicious is correct. sent19: the beachball enters Shebat if it is not a Gardner. sent20: that the beachball does not enter Shebat and/or is unmalicious is false if it is not a Gardner.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not allopatric the fact that either it does not foster or it is not nasty or both is wrong.
sent14 -> int1: the fact that either the sensorium does not foster or it is not nasty or both is not true if the fact that it is not allopatric is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a Gardner then that it does not enter Shebat or it is not unmalicious or both is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Gardner is not wrong then the fact that it either does not enter Shebat or is not unmalicious or both is false. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a Gardner then it is unmalicious. sent3: the fact that something is either not a position or not a Gardner or both is false if it is not a DS. sent4: that either the beachball is not unmalicious or it is not ratty or both does not hold if it does not enter beachball. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Gardner then that it enters Shebat and/or it is not unmalicious is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a Gardner then that it does not enter Shebat or it is unmalicious or both does not hold. sent7: the fact that if the beachball is not the Gardner then the fact that either the beachball does not enter Shebat or it is not unmalicious or both does not hold is correct. sent8: there is something such that if it does duck then the fact that it does not depressurize diffidence or it is not toroidal or both is not correct. sent9: the fact that the beachball is not a Wiesenthal and/or it is not a kinglet does not hold if it is not a neurobiology. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a Gardner it enters Shebat. sent11: if the beachball is a Gardner that it does not enter Shebat and/or is not unmalicious does not hold. sent12: the beachball is not a Gothic and/or it is not a kind of a Serbian if it does not credit equivocation. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a lutefisk then the fact that it does not depressurize locator or it is not a kind of a submarine or both is not right. sent14: the fact that something does not foster or is not nasty or both does not hold if it is not allopatric. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Gardner then it does not enter Shebat and/or is not unmalicious. sent16: there exists something such that if that it does not credit Goa is right then it is gregarious. sent17: there is something such that if it is not uncritical the fact that it is not a kind of a redberry and/or is not a disinterestedness is incorrect. sent18: if the beachball is not a kind of a Gardner then the fact that it does not enter Shebat and/or is not unmalicious is correct. sent19: the beachball enters Shebat if it is not a Gardner. sent20: that the beachball does not enter Shebat and/or is unmalicious is false if it is not a Gardner. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__