the survey does not occur.
sent1: that the sliming Ionian does not occur is triggered by that the biologicalness happens or that the dealing does not occur or both. sent2: the stubbing tightrope does not occur if the underwriting feverroot happens and/or the sliming Picidae occurs. sent3: the pragmatic happens if the Liechtensteinerness does not occur and the sliming Ionian does not occur. sent4: the fact that the fact that either the biologicalness happens or the dealing does not occur or both hold if the sliming Picidae does not occur is not false. sent5: that the surveying happens is brought about by that the pragmaticness happens. sent6: if the forgery does not occur the fact that both the raree-show and the sliming countertenor occurs is not right. sent7: the Liechtensteiner does not occur if the fact that the raree-show and the sliming countertenor happens is incorrect. sent8: the forgery does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the agroundness occurs but the sliming Picidae does not occur is false the agroundness does not occur. sent10: both the prime and the stubbing tightrope happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sliming Picidae happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the underwriting feverroot occurs or the sliming Picidae occurs or both.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the stubbing tightrope does not occur.; sent10 -> int3: the stubbing tightrope happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sliming Picidae does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: either the biologicalness occurs or the dealing does not occur or both.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the sliming Ionian does not occur.; sent6 & sent8 -> int8: the fact that the raree-show and the sliming countertenor occurs is not correct.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the Liechtensteinerness does not occur.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the Liechtensteinerness does not occur and the sliming Ionian does not occur.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the pragmatic occurs.; int11 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the agroundness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the survey does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sliming Ionian does not occur is triggered by that the biologicalness happens or that the dealing does not occur or both. sent2: the stubbing tightrope does not occur if the underwriting feverroot happens and/or the sliming Picidae occurs. sent3: the pragmatic happens if the Liechtensteinerness does not occur and the sliming Ionian does not occur. sent4: the fact that the fact that either the biologicalness happens or the dealing does not occur or both hold if the sliming Picidae does not occur is not false. sent5: that the surveying happens is brought about by that the pragmaticness happens. sent6: if the forgery does not occur the fact that both the raree-show and the sliming countertenor occurs is not right. sent7: the Liechtensteiner does not occur if the fact that the raree-show and the sliming countertenor happens is incorrect. sent8: the forgery does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the agroundness occurs but the sliming Picidae does not occur is false the agroundness does not occur. sent10: both the prime and the stubbing tightrope happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sliming Picidae happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the underwriting feverroot occurs or the sliming Picidae occurs or both.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the stubbing tightrope does not occur.; sent10 -> int3: the stubbing tightrope happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sliming Picidae does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: either the biologicalness occurs or the dealing does not occur or both.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the sliming Ionian does not occur.; sent6 & sent8 -> int8: the fact that the raree-show and the sliming countertenor occurs is not correct.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the Liechtensteinerness does not occur.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the Liechtensteinerness does not occur and the sliming Ionian does not occur.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the pragmatic occurs.; int11 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__