the safflower is not unlivable.
sent1: if the safflower does not torture beggar and/or it is not reverent it is unlivable. sent2: if the kingmaker is a acatalectic then the beggar is a hirsuteness. sent3: if that something does not torture beggar and/or it is not reverent is not right then it does not gong ascot. sent4: if the fact that something does torture beggar and/or it is not reverent is not right then it does not gong ascot. sent5: the safflower either does torture beggar or is not reverent or both. sent6: the beggar is not a Riff if that it is not a kind of a Maclura is true. sent7: the beggar is both not a Riff and not a hirsuteness if it is not a Maclura. sent8: if the safflower does not gong ascot the kingmaker is a kind of a acatalectic. sent9: the beggar is not a kind of a Maclura.
sent3 -> int1: that the safflower does not gong ascot if that the safflower does not torture beggar and/or it is not reverent is wrong is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the safflower does not torture beggar and/or is not reverent is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the safflower does not gong ascot.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the kingmaker is acatalectic.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the beggar is a kind of a hirsuteness.; sent7 & sent9 -> int5: the beggar is not a Riff and is not a hirsuteness.; int5 -> int6: the beggar is not a hirsuteness.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the safflower either does not torture beggar or is not reverent or both.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the safflower is not unlivable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the safflower does not torture beggar and/or it is not reverent it is unlivable. sent2: if the kingmaker is a acatalectic then the beggar is a hirsuteness. sent3: if that something does not torture beggar and/or it is not reverent is not right then it does not gong ascot. sent4: if the fact that something does torture beggar and/or it is not reverent is not right then it does not gong ascot. sent5: the safflower either does torture beggar or is not reverent or both. sent6: the beggar is not a Riff if that it is not a kind of a Maclura is true. sent7: the beggar is both not a Riff and not a hirsuteness if it is not a Maclura. sent8: if the safflower does not gong ascot the kingmaker is a kind of a acatalectic. sent9: the beggar is not a kind of a Maclura. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that the safflower does not gong ascot if that the safflower does not torture beggar and/or it is not reverent is wrong is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the safflower does not torture beggar and/or is not reverent is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the safflower does not gong ascot.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the kingmaker is acatalectic.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the beggar is a kind of a hirsuteness.; sent7 & sent9 -> int5: the beggar is not a Riff and is not a hirsuteness.; int5 -> int6: the beggar is not a hirsuteness.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the safflower either does not torture beggar or is not reverent or both.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__