the racist does not outstare Etropus and does not connect.
sent1: the fact that the racist does not mystify eyeful and does not mystify highball does not hold if that the Depokene connects is not incorrect. sent2: that the Depokene does back but it is not neurological is incorrect. sent3: if that something does not back and it is not neurological is false it does not mystify highball. sent4: if that the telomere is a midterm hold then the fact that the racist outstares Etropus and does not connect does not hold. sent5: that the sluggard is alternate and/or is not backed is false. sent6: if the Depokene does mystify eyeful then the fact that it is a backed and is not neurological is wrong. sent7: that the racist does not outstare Etropus but it does connect is false if the telomere is a midterm. sent8: the fact that the pelisse mystifies highball and it spears is false if the Depokene does not mystifies highball. sent9: the fact that the racist does outstare Etropus and does not connect is wrong. sent10: if the Depokene does not mystify highball that the pelisse does not mystify highball but it spears does not hold. sent11: something does not outstare Etropus and it does not connect if it mystifies eyeful. sent12: the sluggard does not alternate. sent13: that the racist does not connect but it does hum telomere is not true. sent14: the fact that the pelisse mystifies highball and is a spear does not hold. sent15: if the Depokene mystifies eyeful the fact that it is both not backed and neurological is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the Depokene is not a backed but it is neurological does not hold. sent17: the telomere is a midterm if the pelisse mystifies highball. sent18: the fact that the racist does not outstare Etropus and connects is not right. sent19: the fact that something is backed thing that is not neurological is wrong if it mystifies eyeful. sent20: that the sluggard does alternate and/or it does not mystify eyeful is incorrect. sent21: that the racist does not outstare Etropus and it does not connect does not hold if the telomere is a midterm. sent22: if the fact that the sluggard is alternate and/or it does not mystify eyeful does not hold then the Depokene mystify eyeful. sent23: if something does mystify eyeful the fact that it is both not a backed and not neurological does not hold. sent24: the telomere is a midterm if the fact that the pelisse does not mystify highball but it is a spear is false. sent25: that something is not a kind of a backed but it is neurological does not hold if the fact that it does mystify eyeful is not wrong.
sent23 -> int1: that the Depokene is not backed and it is not neurological is not true if it mystifies eyeful.; sent22 & sent20 -> int2: the Depokene does mystify eyeful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Depokene does not back and it is not neurological is not right.; sent3 -> int4: the Depokene does not mystify highball if that it is both not backed and not neurological is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Depokene does not mystify highball.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: that the fact that the pelisse does not mystify highball but it is a spear is incorrect hold.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: the telomere is a kind of a midterm.; int7 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the racist does not outstare Etropus and does not connect.
sent11 -> int8: if the fact that the racist does mystify eyeful hold it does not outstare Etropus and does not connect.;
$hypothesis$ = the racist does not outstare Etropus and does not connect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the racist does not mystify eyeful and does not mystify highball does not hold if that the Depokene connects is not incorrect. sent2: that the Depokene does back but it is not neurological is incorrect. sent3: if that something does not back and it is not neurological is false it does not mystify highball. sent4: if that the telomere is a midterm hold then the fact that the racist outstares Etropus and does not connect does not hold. sent5: that the sluggard is alternate and/or is not backed is false. sent6: if the Depokene does mystify eyeful then the fact that it is a backed and is not neurological is wrong. sent7: that the racist does not outstare Etropus but it does connect is false if the telomere is a midterm. sent8: the fact that the pelisse mystifies highball and it spears is false if the Depokene does not mystifies highball. sent9: the fact that the racist does outstare Etropus and does not connect is wrong. sent10: if the Depokene does not mystify highball that the pelisse does not mystify highball but it spears does not hold. sent11: something does not outstare Etropus and it does not connect if it mystifies eyeful. sent12: the sluggard does not alternate. sent13: that the racist does not connect but it does hum telomere is not true. sent14: the fact that the pelisse mystifies highball and is a spear does not hold. sent15: if the Depokene mystifies eyeful the fact that it is both not backed and neurological is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the Depokene is not a backed but it is neurological does not hold. sent17: the telomere is a midterm if the pelisse mystifies highball. sent18: the fact that the racist does not outstare Etropus and connects is not right. sent19: the fact that something is backed thing that is not neurological is wrong if it mystifies eyeful. sent20: that the sluggard does alternate and/or it does not mystify eyeful is incorrect. sent21: that the racist does not outstare Etropus and it does not connect does not hold if the telomere is a midterm. sent22: if the fact that the sluggard is alternate and/or it does not mystify eyeful does not hold then the Depokene mystify eyeful. sent23: if something does mystify eyeful the fact that it is both not a backed and not neurological does not hold. sent24: the telomere is a midterm if the fact that the pelisse does not mystify highball but it is a spear is false. sent25: that something is not a kind of a backed but it is neurological does not hold if the fact that it does mystify eyeful is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 -> int1: that the Depokene is not backed and it is not neurological is not true if it mystifies eyeful.; sent22 & sent20 -> int2: the Depokene does mystify eyeful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Depokene does not back and it is not neurological is not right.; sent3 -> int4: the Depokene does not mystify highball if that it is both not backed and not neurological is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Depokene does not mystify highball.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: that the fact that the pelisse does not mystify highball but it is a spear is incorrect hold.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: the telomere is a kind of a midterm.; int7 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__