the stroking scene-stealer occurs.
sent1: if the bridgeableness happens then that that the amaranthineness but not the singling characin occurs is correct does not hold. sent2: if the fact that that the distributionalness but not the skateboarding happens is true is false the distributionalness does not occur. sent3: the airdrop occurs. sent4: the epistemicness happens. sent5: if that the distributionalness and the tearfulness happens is wrong then the tearfulness does not occur. sent6: that the bridgeableness and the non-amaranthineness happens is caused by the singling characin. sent7: if the distributionalness does not occur then the fact that the tearfulness does not occur and the birdying does not occur is false. sent8: that the stroking scene-stealer does not occur and the epistemicness does not occur is brought about by that the amaranthineness happens. sent9: that the fact that the singling characin does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the tearfulness does not occur and the birdying does not occur is not right is correct. sent10: the roughing happens. sent11: the fact that the Sisypheanness does not occur is right. sent12: if the stroking scene-stealer happens and the epistemicness occurs then the fibrocalcificness does not occur. sent13: that that the amaranthineness but not the bridgeableness occurs is caused by that the singling characin does not occur hold. sent14: if the singling heliograph does not occur the concurrence does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the amaranthineness but not the singling characin occurs is not true the amaranthineness does not occur.
the fact that the stroking scene-stealer does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = the stroking scene-stealer occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bridgeableness happens then that that the amaranthineness but not the singling characin occurs is correct does not hold. sent2: if the fact that that the distributionalness but not the skateboarding happens is true is false the distributionalness does not occur. sent3: the airdrop occurs. sent4: the epistemicness happens. sent5: if that the distributionalness and the tearfulness happens is wrong then the tearfulness does not occur. sent6: that the bridgeableness and the non-amaranthineness happens is caused by the singling characin. sent7: if the distributionalness does not occur then the fact that the tearfulness does not occur and the birdying does not occur is false. sent8: that the stroking scene-stealer does not occur and the epistemicness does not occur is brought about by that the amaranthineness happens. sent9: that the fact that the singling characin does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the tearfulness does not occur and the birdying does not occur is not right is correct. sent10: the roughing happens. sent11: the fact that the Sisypheanness does not occur is right. sent12: if the stroking scene-stealer happens and the epistemicness occurs then the fibrocalcificness does not occur. sent13: that that the amaranthineness but not the bridgeableness occurs is caused by that the singling characin does not occur hold. sent14: if the singling heliograph does not occur the concurrence does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the amaranthineness but not the singling characin occurs is not true the amaranthineness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__