the vinblastine is a serviceability.
sent1: the fact that the vinblastine is a politeness but it is not a serviceability is incorrect if that the transgressor enjoys is not incorrect. sent2: if the transgressor is a kind of a politeness then the liana enjoys. sent3: if the fact that something is a politeness but it is not a serviceability is not right then it is a kind of a serviceability. sent4: the carangid is a kind of a Damascene if the icetray does not enjoy but it is an imperative. sent5: the carangid is a Damascene if the icetray does not enjoy and is not a kind of an imperative. sent6: if the iva is a Damascene or apocrine or both the carangid is not a kind of a Damascene. sent7: the icetray is not a kind of an imperative if the liana enjoys. sent8: the icetray is not imperative. sent9: the icetray does not enjoy and it is not imperative if the liana enjoy. sent10: if the iva is apocrine then that the carangid is not a kind of a Damascene is true. sent11: that the transgressor is a kind of a politeness hold if that the vinblastine is a serviceability hold. sent12: the iva is a Damascene and/or it is apocrine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vinblastine is a kind of a serviceability.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the transgressor is a politeness.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the liana does enjoy is not incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the icetray does not enjoy and it is not an imperative.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the carangid is a Damascene.; sent6 & sent12 -> int5: the carangid is not a Damascene.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the vinblastine is a serviceability.
sent3 -> int7: the vinblastine is a serviceability if the fact that it is a kind of a politeness and it is not a serviceability is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the vinblastine is a serviceability. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the vinblastine is a politeness but it is not a serviceability is incorrect if that the transgressor enjoys is not incorrect. sent2: if the transgressor is a kind of a politeness then the liana enjoys. sent3: if the fact that something is a politeness but it is not a serviceability is not right then it is a kind of a serviceability. sent4: the carangid is a kind of a Damascene if the icetray does not enjoy but it is an imperative. sent5: the carangid is a Damascene if the icetray does not enjoy and is not a kind of an imperative. sent6: if the iva is a Damascene or apocrine or both the carangid is not a kind of a Damascene. sent7: the icetray is not a kind of an imperative if the liana enjoys. sent8: the icetray is not imperative. sent9: the icetray does not enjoy and it is not imperative if the liana enjoy. sent10: if the iva is apocrine then that the carangid is not a kind of a Damascene is true. sent11: that the transgressor is a kind of a politeness hold if that the vinblastine is a serviceability hold. sent12: the iva is a Damascene and/or it is apocrine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vinblastine is a kind of a serviceability.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the transgressor is a politeness.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the liana does enjoy is not incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the icetray does not enjoy and it is not an imperative.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the carangid is a Damascene.; sent6 & sent12 -> int5: the carangid is not a Damascene.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__