the toucanet does not gate Roridulaceae.
sent1: something that is not nonmodern is focal but not a sheared. sent2: the fact that the toucanet is neuromuscular and it achromatizes leap is not right if that it does not gate griffon is not wrong. sent3: if something is not sericultural then it does gate Roridulaceae and is neuromuscular. sent4: the toucanet is a kind of a adsorbent if the fact that it is three-dimensional and it does not achromatize Rhodosphaera is not correct. sent5: the toucanet does gate Roridulaceae if that it is neuromuscular thing that does not achromatize leap is not true. sent6: the IR is not nonmodern if the lionet is both nonmodern and uncharacteristic. sent7: if the toucanet does not gate griffon then that it is neuromuscular and it does not achromatize leap does not hold. sent8: if something is a kind of a washroom it is not a loanword and it is cross-sectional. sent9: the toucanet does not gate griffon if something is three-dimensional and it does achromatize llama. sent10: if something is focal then the fact that it is not a kind of a brag and is a kind of a graveness is false. sent11: something is not three-dimensional but it achromatizes llama. sent12: the toucanet does not gate griffon if there is something such that that it is not three-dimensional and it does achromatize llama is not incorrect. sent13: something is not three-dimensional. sent14: the Kali is a washroom if the fact that the llama is not a kind of a brag but it is a graveness is false. sent15: the shag is a loanword if the Kali is not a loanword and is cross-sectional. sent16: something that does gate Roridulaceae and is neuromuscular does not achromatize leap. sent17: if either something does not achromatize leap or it gates griffon or both the fact that it does not gate Roridulaceae hold. sent18: if the IR is focal but it is not a sheared the llama is focal. sent19: the toucanet is not sericultural if the shag is a kind of a loanword. sent20: the fact that the iteration does gate griffon but it is not a vellum is not correct if the toucanet does not achromatize leap.
sent11 & sent12 -> int1: the toucanet does not gate griffon.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that that the toucanet is neuromuscular thing that does not achromatize leap is right is not correct.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the iteration gates griffon and is not a vellum does not hold.
sent16 -> int3: the toucanet does not achromatize leap if it does gate Roridulaceae and is not non-neuromuscular.; sent3 -> int4: if the toucanet is not sericultural then it does gate Roridulaceae and it is neuromuscular.; sent8 -> int5: the Kali is not a loanword but it is cross-sectional if it is a washroom.; sent10 -> int6: that the llama is not a brag but a graveness is incorrect if it is focal.; sent1 -> int7: if the IR is not nonmodern it is focal and is not a kind of a sheared.;
$hypothesis$ = the toucanet does not gate Roridulaceae. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not nonmodern is focal but not a sheared. sent2: the fact that the toucanet is neuromuscular and it achromatizes leap is not right if that it does not gate griffon is not wrong. sent3: if something is not sericultural then it does gate Roridulaceae and is neuromuscular. sent4: the toucanet is a kind of a adsorbent if the fact that it is three-dimensional and it does not achromatize Rhodosphaera is not correct. sent5: the toucanet does gate Roridulaceae if that it is neuromuscular thing that does not achromatize leap is not true. sent6: the IR is not nonmodern if the lionet is both nonmodern and uncharacteristic. sent7: if the toucanet does not gate griffon then that it is neuromuscular and it does not achromatize leap does not hold. sent8: if something is a kind of a washroom it is not a loanword and it is cross-sectional. sent9: the toucanet does not gate griffon if something is three-dimensional and it does achromatize llama. sent10: if something is focal then the fact that it is not a kind of a brag and is a kind of a graveness is false. sent11: something is not three-dimensional but it achromatizes llama. sent12: the toucanet does not gate griffon if there is something such that that it is not three-dimensional and it does achromatize llama is not incorrect. sent13: something is not three-dimensional. sent14: the Kali is a washroom if the fact that the llama is not a kind of a brag but it is a graveness is false. sent15: the shag is a loanword if the Kali is not a loanword and is cross-sectional. sent16: something that does gate Roridulaceae and is neuromuscular does not achromatize leap. sent17: if either something does not achromatize leap or it gates griffon or both the fact that it does not gate Roridulaceae hold. sent18: if the IR is focal but it is not a sheared the llama is focal. sent19: the toucanet is not sericultural if the shag is a kind of a loanword. sent20: the fact that the iteration does gate griffon but it is not a vellum is not correct if the toucanet does not achromatize leap. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent12 -> int1: the toucanet does not gate griffon.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that that the toucanet is neuromuscular thing that does not achromatize leap is right is not correct.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__