the beating sene does not occur.
sent1: the beating sene happens if the metastaticness does not occur. sent2: the dominating childlessness happens. sent3: the fact that the Salvadoranness occurs and the dominating malcontent happens is not incorrect if the typographicness does not occur. sent4: if either the rig does not occur or the dominating polonaise does not occur or both then the fact that the dominating polonaise does not occur is right. sent5: if the loudness happens and the Salvadoran happens the metastaticness does not occur. sent6: the reservation happens. sent7: the symbolizing BSE does not occur but the bibliophilicness happens. sent8: the typographicness is prevented by that the regress does not occur and/or the dominating Leon does not occur. sent9: if not the rig but the imperialism occurs the loudness occurs. sent10: the fact that the imperialism occurs is right if the symbolizing BSE does not occur but the bibliophilicness occurs. sent11: the dominating Leon does not occur. sent12: if both the dominating childlessness and the reservation occurs then the fact that the rigging does not occur is not false.
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: that the dominating childlessness occurs and the reservation happens is correct.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the rigging does not occur is not wrong.; sent10 & sent7 -> int3: the imperialism happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: not the rigging but the imperialism occurs.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the loudness occurs.; sent11 -> int6: the regress does not occur and/or the dominating Leon does not occur.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the typographicness does not occur.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the Salvadoran occurs and the dominating malcontent occurs.; int8 -> int9: the Salvadoranness occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the loudness happens and the Salvadoranness occurs.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the metastaticness does not occur.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the dominating polonaise does not occur but the courtesy occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the beating sene does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the beating sene happens if the metastaticness does not occur. sent2: the dominating childlessness happens. sent3: the fact that the Salvadoranness occurs and the dominating malcontent happens is not incorrect if the typographicness does not occur. sent4: if either the rig does not occur or the dominating polonaise does not occur or both then the fact that the dominating polonaise does not occur is right. sent5: if the loudness happens and the Salvadoran happens the metastaticness does not occur. sent6: the reservation happens. sent7: the symbolizing BSE does not occur but the bibliophilicness happens. sent8: the typographicness is prevented by that the regress does not occur and/or the dominating Leon does not occur. sent9: if not the rig but the imperialism occurs the loudness occurs. sent10: the fact that the imperialism occurs is right if the symbolizing BSE does not occur but the bibliophilicness occurs. sent11: the dominating Leon does not occur. sent12: if both the dominating childlessness and the reservation occurs then the fact that the rigging does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: that the dominating childlessness occurs and the reservation happens is correct.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the rigging does not occur is not wrong.; sent10 & sent7 -> int3: the imperialism happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: not the rigging but the imperialism occurs.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the loudness occurs.; sent11 -> int6: the regress does not occur and/or the dominating Leon does not occur.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the typographicness does not occur.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the Salvadoran occurs and the dominating malcontent occurs.; int8 -> int9: the Salvadoranness occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the loudness happens and the Salvadoranness occurs.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the metastaticness does not occur.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__