the selenium is a tetralogy.
sent1: if the jasper is not a stigmatic it does not crook trademarked and does not crook Becquerel. sent2: the jasper is not stigmatic. sent3: if there is something such that that it is Moravian and it is a kind of a psychophysicist is not correct the baton is a kind of a ERT. sent4: the selenium is a tetralogy if the jasper is Moravian. sent5: there exists something such that it is a psychophysicist and it is peritoneal. sent6: the stopping is not a ERT. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a psychophysicist then the jasper is Moravian. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not crook trademarked and does not crook Becquerel then the baton does not color. sent9: something is not a kind of a tetralogy if that it is a tetralogy and is not a ERT is not true. sent10: if the stopping is not a ERT that the baton is a psychophysicist and it is peritoneal is wrong.
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: that the fact that the baton is a psychophysicist and is peritoneal is incorrect is right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a psychophysicist and is peritoneal is incorrect.;
the fact that the selenium is a tetralogy does not hold.
sent9 -> int3: the fact that the selenium is not a tetralogy is right if the fact that it is a tetralogy but not a ERT does not hold.; sent1 & sent2 -> int4: the jasper does not crook trademarked and does not crook Becquerel.; int4 -> int5: something does not crook trademarked and does not crook Becquerel.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the baton does not color.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is non-colors.;
$hypothesis$ = the selenium is a tetralogy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the jasper is not a stigmatic it does not crook trademarked and does not crook Becquerel. sent2: the jasper is not stigmatic. sent3: if there is something such that that it is Moravian and it is a kind of a psychophysicist is not correct the baton is a kind of a ERT. sent4: the selenium is a tetralogy if the jasper is Moravian. sent5: there exists something such that it is a psychophysicist and it is peritoneal. sent6: the stopping is not a ERT. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a psychophysicist then the jasper is Moravian. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not crook trademarked and does not crook Becquerel then the baton does not color. sent9: something is not a kind of a tetralogy if that it is a tetralogy and is not a ERT is not true. sent10: if the stopping is not a ERT that the baton is a psychophysicist and it is peritoneal is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: that the fact that the baton is a psychophysicist and is peritoneal is incorrect is right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a psychophysicist and is peritoneal is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__