the fact that that the proximalness happens prevents that the bogging lizard's-tail does not occur is wrong.
sent1: that the fact that the fact that the pro-choiceness happens or the Bismarckianness does not occur or both is incorrect hold if the proximalness happens hold. sent2: if the fact that the pro-choiceness occurs and/or the Bismarckianness does not occur is not correct then the bogging lizard's-tail happens. sent3: the pro-choiceness does not occur. sent4: the pro-choiceness is prevented by that the proximalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the proximalness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pro-choiceness occurs or the Bismarckianness does not occur or both is not true.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the bogging lizard's-tail occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the proximalness happens prevents that the bogging lizard's-tail does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the fact that the pro-choiceness happens or the Bismarckianness does not occur or both is incorrect hold if the proximalness happens hold. sent2: if the fact that the pro-choiceness occurs and/or the Bismarckianness does not occur is not correct then the bogging lizard's-tail happens. sent3: the pro-choiceness does not occur. sent4: the pro-choiceness is prevented by that the proximalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the proximalness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pro-choiceness occurs or the Bismarckianness does not occur or both is not true.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the bogging lizard's-tail occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__