the thermostat is uncared-for.
sent1: if something does not subdivide fringe the fact that it does not interpret brad and is hard is not correct. sent2: the thermostat is a kind of a washed. sent3: the burgomaster either is nonslippery or is hard or both. sent4: if the waffle is both a Cromwell and not uncared-for then the fact that the burgomaster is not uncared-for is true. sent5: something is geometric if the fact that it does not interpret brad and is hard is not correct. sent6: the burgomaster is a CDC. sent7: if something is a kind of a Rajput then it is uncared-for. sent8: if something is hard and/or interprets brad the thermostat subdivides fringe. sent9: the waffle is a kind of a Cromwell but it is not uncared-for. sent10: if the burgomaster is cared-for and non-hard then the thermostat is not cared-for. sent11: something criticizes and/or is atonal. sent12: something is a Rajput if that it does subdivide fringe is not wrong. sent13: there exists something such that either it is meaningless or it does stipulate or both.
sent12 -> int1: if the thermostat does subdivide fringe then it is a Rajput.; sent7 -> int2: if the thermostat is a kind of a Rajput it is uncared-for.;
the thermostat is not uncared-for.
sent4 & sent9 -> int3: that the burgomaster is not uncared-for is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the thermostat is uncared-for. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not subdivide fringe the fact that it does not interpret brad and is hard is not correct. sent2: the thermostat is a kind of a washed. sent3: the burgomaster either is nonslippery or is hard or both. sent4: if the waffle is both a Cromwell and not uncared-for then the fact that the burgomaster is not uncared-for is true. sent5: something is geometric if the fact that it does not interpret brad and is hard is not correct. sent6: the burgomaster is a CDC. sent7: if something is a kind of a Rajput then it is uncared-for. sent8: if something is hard and/or interprets brad the thermostat subdivides fringe. sent9: the waffle is a kind of a Cromwell but it is not uncared-for. sent10: if the burgomaster is cared-for and non-hard then the thermostat is not cared-for. sent11: something criticizes and/or is atonal. sent12: something is a Rajput if that it does subdivide fringe is not wrong. sent13: there exists something such that either it is meaningless or it does stipulate or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the thermostat does subdivide fringe then it is a Rajput.; sent7 -> int2: if the thermostat is a kind of a Rajput it is uncared-for.; __UNKNOWN__