the reprobate is gluteal.
sent1: that if the newmarket honeys uncreativeness the cyborg is aoristic is not incorrect. sent2: something does honey uncreativeness if the fact that it is sarcolemmal thing that is not a kind of a bowfin is not right. sent3: if something is not a saturation then that it is sarcolemmal and is not a kind of a bowfin does not hold. sent4: something is not gluteal if it honeys uncreativeness and it is ferric. sent5: that the astilbe is ferric is correct. sent6: if the outline is sarcolemmal then the epigenesis is a bowfin. sent7: the fact that the epigenesis honeys uncreativeness hold. sent8: the outline is sarcolemmal if the cyborg is aoristic. sent9: if the astilbe is ferric the newmarket honeys uncreativeness. sent10: if the epigenesis is a bowfin the reprobate is gluteal.
sent9 & sent5 -> int1: the newmarket honeys uncreativeness.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the cyborg is aoristic.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the outline is not non-sarcolemmal.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the epigenesis is a bowfin.; sent10 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the reprobate is not gluteal.
sent4 -> int5: if the reprobate does honey uncreativeness and it is ferric it is not gluteal.; sent2 -> int6: the reprobate does honey uncreativeness if the fact that it is sarcolemmal thing that is not a kind of a bowfin is not correct.; sent3 -> int7: if the reprobate is not a kind of a saturation then the fact that it is sarcolemmal and it is not a bowfin is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the reprobate is gluteal. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the newmarket honeys uncreativeness the cyborg is aoristic is not incorrect. sent2: something does honey uncreativeness if the fact that it is sarcolemmal thing that is not a kind of a bowfin is not right. sent3: if something is not a saturation then that it is sarcolemmal and is not a kind of a bowfin does not hold. sent4: something is not gluteal if it honeys uncreativeness and it is ferric. sent5: that the astilbe is ferric is correct. sent6: if the outline is sarcolemmal then the epigenesis is a bowfin. sent7: the fact that the epigenesis honeys uncreativeness hold. sent8: the outline is sarcolemmal if the cyborg is aoristic. sent9: if the astilbe is ferric the newmarket honeys uncreativeness. sent10: if the epigenesis is a bowfin the reprobate is gluteal. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent5 -> int1: the newmarket honeys uncreativeness.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the cyborg is aoristic.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the outline is not non-sarcolemmal.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the epigenesis is a bowfin.; sent10 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__