the fact that the primidone is a bluetongue is not incorrect.
sent1: if something is a bluetongue and is not a rijsttaffel it is not absent. sent2: if there is something such that that it does not report neap and it is not a dagame is wrong then the gasp does report neap. sent3: if the fashion is a relay it does not report neap and it does not absent. sent4: if the primidone does not absent then that the fashion is a relay but not absent is not correct. sent5: something is a Key and a budgerigar. sent6: if something is a kind of a Key that is a budgerigar the primidone is not a rijsttaffel. sent7: if that the fashion concentrates but it is not a dagame is not right it is a kind of a relay. sent8: something is a bluetongue if it is a Key. sent9: if there exists something such that it does not concentrate then that the thermostat does not report neap and is not a kind of a dagame is false. sent10: if something does not absent then it is both not a rijsttaffel and a budgerigar. sent11: the fact that the gasp reports neap is not right if the fact that the fashion is a kind of a relay that does not absent is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that it does not concentrate.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the primidone is not a kind of a rijsttaffel is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the primidone is a bluetongue.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the primidone is a bluetongue that is not a rijsttaffel.; sent1 -> int3: if the primidone is a kind of a bluetongue that is not a rijsttaffel it is not absent.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the primidone is not absent.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the fashion does relay but it is not absent is not true.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the gasp does not report neap.; sent12 & sent9 -> int7: that the thermostat does not report neap and is not a dagame does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not report neap and it is not a dagame is incorrect.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the gasp reports neap.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the primidone is a bluetongue.
sent8 -> int11: the primidone is a kind of a bluetongue if it is a kind of a Key.; sent10 -> int12: the fashion is not a rijsttaffel but it is a budgerigar if it is non-absent.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the primidone is a bluetongue is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a bluetongue and is not a rijsttaffel it is not absent. sent2: if there is something such that that it does not report neap and it is not a dagame is wrong then the gasp does report neap. sent3: if the fashion is a relay it does not report neap and it does not absent. sent4: if the primidone does not absent then that the fashion is a relay but not absent is not correct. sent5: something is a Key and a budgerigar. sent6: if something is a kind of a Key that is a budgerigar the primidone is not a rijsttaffel. sent7: if that the fashion concentrates but it is not a dagame is not right it is a kind of a relay. sent8: something is a bluetongue if it is a Key. sent9: if there exists something such that it does not concentrate then that the thermostat does not report neap and is not a kind of a dagame is false. sent10: if something does not absent then it is both not a rijsttaffel and a budgerigar. sent11: the fact that the gasp reports neap is not right if the fact that the fashion is a kind of a relay that does not absent is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that it does not concentrate. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the primidone is not a kind of a rijsttaffel is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the primidone is a bluetongue.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the primidone is a bluetongue that is not a rijsttaffel.; sent1 -> int3: if the primidone is a kind of a bluetongue that is not a rijsttaffel it is not absent.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the primidone is not absent.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the fashion does relay but it is not absent is not true.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the gasp does not report neap.; sent12 & sent9 -> int7: that the thermostat does not report neap and is not a dagame does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not report neap and it is not a dagame is incorrect.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the gasp reports neap.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__