the fact that the corruption is a push is not incorrect.
sent1: if something is not lithophytic then it does squawk corruption. sent2: the corruption does not squawk corruption. sent3: the boomerang is not a intercommunion if there exists something such that it is a trifle. sent4: there exists something such that it is psychotherapeutic. sent5: there is something such that it does treat tulip. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a craniotomy. sent7: the demineralization enters. sent8: the southland is non-lithophytic. sent9: the demineralization is lithophytic. sent10: if something is not a kind of a intercommunion then it is not lithophytic. sent11: something is not psychotherapeutic if it is not a kind of a bluegill. sent12: the boomerang is a bluegill if there exists something such that it is lithophytic and it squawks corruption. sent13: the corruption is a kind of a push if there exists something such that it covets Benny and squawks corruption. sent14: something is a trifle. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a bluegill the demineralization is a push and it does covet Benny. sent16: there exists something such that it does treat June. sent17: the demineralization does covet Benny and is lithophytic if something is a bluegill. sent18: the boomerang covets Benny if the demineralization is a bluegill. sent19: if the demineralization is not psychotherapeutic then it is a intercommunion. sent20: if that there exists something such that it is a bluegill and it does squawk corruption is correct then the boomerang is lithophytic. sent21: there exists something such that it is Cuban and it is abient. sent22: the demineralization is both psychotherapeutic and a bluegill if there exists something such that it does treat June.
sent16 & sent22 -> int1: the demineralization is psychotherapeutic and it is a kind of a bluegill.; int1 -> int2: the demineralization is a kind of a bluegill.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the boomerang covets Benny.; sent1 -> int4: if the boomerang is not lithophytic it does squawk corruption.; sent10 -> int5: if the boomerang is not a intercommunion it is not lithophytic.; sent14 & sent3 -> int6: the boomerang is not a intercommunion.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the boomerang is not lithophytic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the boomerang squawks corruption.; int3 & int8 -> int9: that the boomerang covets Benny and it does squawk corruption is not false.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it covets Benny and does squawk corruption.; int10 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the corruption is a push is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not lithophytic then it does squawk corruption. sent2: the corruption does not squawk corruption. sent3: the boomerang is not a intercommunion if there exists something such that it is a trifle. sent4: there exists something such that it is psychotherapeutic. sent5: there is something such that it does treat tulip. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a craniotomy. sent7: the demineralization enters. sent8: the southland is non-lithophytic. sent9: the demineralization is lithophytic. sent10: if something is not a kind of a intercommunion then it is not lithophytic. sent11: something is not psychotherapeutic if it is not a kind of a bluegill. sent12: the boomerang is a bluegill if there exists something such that it is lithophytic and it squawks corruption. sent13: the corruption is a kind of a push if there exists something such that it covets Benny and squawks corruption. sent14: something is a trifle. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a bluegill the demineralization is a push and it does covet Benny. sent16: there exists something such that it does treat June. sent17: the demineralization does covet Benny and is lithophytic if something is a bluegill. sent18: the boomerang covets Benny if the demineralization is a bluegill. sent19: if the demineralization is not psychotherapeutic then it is a intercommunion. sent20: if that there exists something such that it is a bluegill and it does squawk corruption is correct then the boomerang is lithophytic. sent21: there exists something such that it is Cuban and it is abient. sent22: the demineralization is both psychotherapeutic and a bluegill if there exists something such that it does treat June. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent22 -> int1: the demineralization is psychotherapeutic and it is a kind of a bluegill.; int1 -> int2: the demineralization is a kind of a bluegill.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the boomerang covets Benny.; sent1 -> int4: if the boomerang is not lithophytic it does squawk corruption.; sent10 -> int5: if the boomerang is not a intercommunion it is not lithophytic.; sent14 & sent3 -> int6: the boomerang is not a intercommunion.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the boomerang is not lithophytic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the boomerang squawks corruption.; int3 & int8 -> int9: that the boomerang covets Benny and it does squawk corruption is not false.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it covets Benny and does squawk corruption.; int10 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__