that the pyrogallol is not a kind of a Gabor is not wrong.
sent1: if something does not purify it is a nap or is catechetical or both. sent2: if the pyrogallol is not a kind of a nap the fact that the fact that it does transaminate defloration and it transaminates shogi is not incorrect does not hold. sent3: that something is a fiddlestick and it is a ferrocyanide is incorrect if it does not transaminate coiffeuse. sent4: the pyrogallol is not a nap. sent5: the pyrogallol is not a kind of a Gabor if it does not transaminate defloration. sent6: the fact that the alternator does not log naughtiness hold. sent7: something that does not transaminate defloration is not a kind of a Gabor.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the pyrogallol transaminates defloration and does transaminate shogi is false.;
the pyrogallol is a kind of a Gabor.
sent1 -> int2: if the enrollee does not purify then it naps and/or it is catechetical.; sent6 -> int3: there is something such that it does not log naughtiness.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pyrogallol is not a kind of a Gabor is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not purify it is a nap or is catechetical or both. sent2: if the pyrogallol is not a kind of a nap the fact that the fact that it does transaminate defloration and it transaminates shogi is not incorrect does not hold. sent3: that something is a fiddlestick and it is a ferrocyanide is incorrect if it does not transaminate coiffeuse. sent4: the pyrogallol is not a nap. sent5: the pyrogallol is not a kind of a Gabor if it does not transaminate defloration. sent6: the fact that the alternator does not log naughtiness hold. sent7: something that does not transaminate defloration is not a kind of a Gabor. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the pyrogallol transaminates defloration and does transaminate shogi is false.; __UNKNOWN__