that the coatdress is not a hemiparasite and does invest Arminianism does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it either is cadastral or does not unloose strategist or both does not hold. sent2: if the ubiquinone is not ventral the coatdress is not a hemiparasite. sent3: the horseradish is not a kind of a ban if the ubiquinone tabulates storyline. sent4: the coatdress is not ventral if the fact that the ubiquinone is not a kind of a ban and is not ventral is not true. sent5: the HDL is a kind of a negative. sent6: either the horseradish is a negative or it is a Dutch or both if there is something such that it is stemless. sent7: the HDL is a negative and invests Arminianism if it is not a kind of a hemiparasite. sent8: there is nothing such that it is a ban and it does tabulate storyline. sent9: the ubiquinone does tabulate storyline if it is not non-ventral. sent10: the HDL is a negative if it is not stemless. sent11: if something is not ventral the fact that it is not a kind of a hemiparasite and invests Arminianism is incorrect. sent12: the HDL is not a Dutch if the horseradish does tabulate storyline and is not a ban. sent13: the HDL is not stemless. sent14: the fact that the horseradish is not a ban is right. sent15: if something is not stemless it is a Dutch and it is negative. sent16: the fact that the coatdress invests Arminianism hold if there exists something such that it does not unloose strategist. sent17: if something is not stemless it is a kind of a negative. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not mealy the horseradish is a Eptesicus. sent19: the horseradish tabulates storyline but it is not a ban if the ubiquinone tabulates storyline. sent20: the ubiquinone unlooses strategist if the horseradish unlooses strategist. sent21: that the ubiquinone is not a ban and is not ventral does not hold if that the horseradish tabulates storyline is not false. sent22: there exists something such that it does not unloose strategist. sent23: the HDL is not Dutch if the horseradish tabulates storyline and bans. sent24: there exists something such that it unlooses strategist.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ubiquinone is ventral is correct.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ubiquinone does tabulate storyline is not false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the horseradish does tabulate storyline and does not ban.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the HDL is not a kind of a Dutch.; sent15 -> int4: if the HDL is not stemless it is both a Dutch and negative.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the HDL is a kind of a Dutch and it is negative.; int5 -> int6: the HDL is a kind of a Dutch.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the ubiquinone is not ventral.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the coatdress is not a hemiparasite.; sent22 & sent16 -> int10: the coatdress does invest Arminianism.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the coatdress is not a hemiparasite and does invest Arminianism does not hold.
sent11 -> int11: the fact that the coatdress is not a hemiparasite but it invests Arminianism is not right if it is not ventral.;
$hypothesis$ = that the coatdress is not a hemiparasite and does invest Arminianism does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it either is cadastral or does not unloose strategist or both does not hold. sent2: if the ubiquinone is not ventral the coatdress is not a hemiparasite. sent3: the horseradish is not a kind of a ban if the ubiquinone tabulates storyline. sent4: the coatdress is not ventral if the fact that the ubiquinone is not a kind of a ban and is not ventral is not true. sent5: the HDL is a kind of a negative. sent6: either the horseradish is a negative or it is a Dutch or both if there is something such that it is stemless. sent7: the HDL is a negative and invests Arminianism if it is not a kind of a hemiparasite. sent8: there is nothing such that it is a ban and it does tabulate storyline. sent9: the ubiquinone does tabulate storyline if it is not non-ventral. sent10: the HDL is a negative if it is not stemless. sent11: if something is not ventral the fact that it is not a kind of a hemiparasite and invests Arminianism is incorrect. sent12: the HDL is not a Dutch if the horseradish does tabulate storyline and is not a ban. sent13: the HDL is not stemless. sent14: the fact that the horseradish is not a ban is right. sent15: if something is not stemless it is a Dutch and it is negative. sent16: the fact that the coatdress invests Arminianism hold if there exists something such that it does not unloose strategist. sent17: if something is not stemless it is a kind of a negative. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not mealy the horseradish is a Eptesicus. sent19: the horseradish tabulates storyline but it is not a ban if the ubiquinone tabulates storyline. sent20: the ubiquinone unlooses strategist if the horseradish unlooses strategist. sent21: that the ubiquinone is not a ban and is not ventral does not hold if that the horseradish tabulates storyline is not false. sent22: there exists something such that it does not unloose strategist. sent23: the HDL is not Dutch if the horseradish tabulates storyline and bans. sent24: there exists something such that it unlooses strategist. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ubiquinone is ventral is correct.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ubiquinone does tabulate storyline is not false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the horseradish does tabulate storyline and does not ban.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the HDL is not a kind of a Dutch.; sent15 -> int4: if the HDL is not stemless it is both a Dutch and negative.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the HDL is a kind of a Dutch and it is negative.; int5 -> int6: the HDL is a kind of a Dutch.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the ubiquinone is not ventral.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the coatdress is not a hemiparasite.; sent22 & sent16 -> int10: the coatdress does invest Arminianism.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__