the fact that both the burning and the deniableness happens is incorrect.
sent1: if the deprecation occurs that the burning and the deniableness occurs is not true. sent2: that either the exceeding beatification does not occur or the preempting Graham occurs or both prevents that the preempting Graham does not occur. sent3: the disagreeableness does not occur. sent4: the preempting Graham does not occur if the deprecation does not occur and the preempting tragacanth occurs. sent5: if the disagreeableness does not occur then the exceeding beatification does not occur and/or the preempting Graham happens. sent6: the deprecation does not occur. sent7: if the preempting tragacanth does not occur the burning occurs but the undeniableness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the preempting tragacanth occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: not the deprecation but the preempting tragacanth occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the preempting Graham does not occur.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the exceeding beatification does not occur or the preempting Graham happens or both.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the preempting Graham happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the preempting tragacanth does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that both the burning and the non-undeniableness occurs is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the burning and the deniableness happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the deprecation occurs that the burning and the deniableness occurs is not true. sent2: that either the exceeding beatification does not occur or the preempting Graham occurs or both prevents that the preempting Graham does not occur. sent3: the disagreeableness does not occur. sent4: the preempting Graham does not occur if the deprecation does not occur and the preempting tragacanth occurs. sent5: if the disagreeableness does not occur then the exceeding beatification does not occur and/or the preempting Graham happens. sent6: the deprecation does not occur. sent7: if the preempting tragacanth does not occur the burning occurs but the undeniableness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the preempting tragacanth occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: not the deprecation but the preempting tragacanth occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the preempting Graham does not occur.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the exceeding beatification does not occur or the preempting Graham happens or both.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the preempting Graham happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the preempting tragacanth does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__