there exists something such that if it does integrate Teleprompter the fact that it is a ootid and it is not an acetate is not right.
sent1: the fact that something does integrate Teleprompter but it does not mystify Bellingham does not hold if it is soteriological. sent2: the fact that the tramway is a ootid and it is a kind of an acetate is wrong if it does integrate Teleprompter. sent3: if the tramway integrates Teleprompter then that it is a ootid that is not an acetate does not hold. sent4: if something is a scarf the fact that it is a kind of a subscript and it is not a enol is false. sent5: if something is presocratic then the fact that it is Lincolnesque and it is not a kind of a cabin does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it is unmanageable then that it is both a scarf and comic is incorrect. sent7: that that the tramway is a potherb and an acetate is incorrect hold if it is grateful. sent8: the tramway is a ootid but it is not a kind of an acetate if it does integrate Teleprompter. sent9: there is something such that if it is autotrophic then the fact that it is a Iresine and it is a overbid does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not imprudent is not false that it does opine and does not mystify Jaffar is not correct.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the Kwell is soteriological then the fact that the fact that it does integrate Teleprompter and does not mystify Bellingham hold does not hold.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does integrate Teleprompter the fact that it is a ootid and it is not an acetate is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does integrate Teleprompter but it does not mystify Bellingham does not hold if it is soteriological. sent2: the fact that the tramway is a ootid and it is a kind of an acetate is wrong if it does integrate Teleprompter. sent3: if the tramway integrates Teleprompter then that it is a ootid that is not an acetate does not hold. sent4: if something is a scarf the fact that it is a kind of a subscript and it is not a enol is false. sent5: if something is presocratic then the fact that it is Lincolnesque and it is not a kind of a cabin does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it is unmanageable then that it is both a scarf and comic is incorrect. sent7: that that the tramway is a potherb and an acetate is incorrect hold if it is grateful. sent8: the tramway is a ootid but it is not a kind of an acetate if it does integrate Teleprompter. sent9: there is something such that if it is autotrophic then the fact that it is a Iresine and it is a overbid does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not imprudent is not false that it does opine and does not mystify Jaffar is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__