the fact that there exists something such that if that it is prenuptial and it does not whirl meltwater is incorrect then the fact that it is prenuptial is incorrect is wrong.
sent1: the gambrel is prenuptial if the fact that it is prenuptial and it does not whirl meltwater is false. sent2: if that the gambrel is a bait and is not a terminal is incorrect then it is not a bait. sent3: the gambrel does not whirl meltwater if there is something such that the fact that it does curdle and it is a Parthian does not hold. sent4: the fact that the meltwater is Proustian thing that does not shoplift does not hold. sent5: the fact that the gambrel beads but it is not chyliferous is right. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is prenuptial thing that whirls meltwater is false it is not prenuptial. sent7: the gambrel does not whirl meltwater if there exists something such that it is not a Parthian. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is prenuptial and does not whirl meltwater is not true it is prenuptial. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is a continuo and does investigate jawan is not true. sent10: the gambrel does not curdle if that it does curdle and it is not a Idaho does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that that it does curdle and it is a Parthian is not right. sent12: the pollinium is non-viral. sent13: if the fact that the gambrel is prenuptial and does not ascend does not hold it is prenuptial. sent14: if the fact that the refractory is sacerdotal but it does not whirl meltwater is wrong then it is not sacerdotal. sent15: the countrywoman investigates blacksmith and is not a kind of a revenant. sent16: there is something such that it does curdle and it is Parthian. sent17: the gambrel is a kind of a ptyalith but it is not a kind of a bait. sent18: the gambrel is not a Andrew. sent19: there exists something such that if it is prenuptial and it does not whirl meltwater it is not prenuptial.
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: the gambrel does not whirl meltwater.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gambrel is prenuptial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gambrel is prenuptial and does not whirl meltwater.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the gambrel is prenuptial and does not whirl meltwater is not true.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gambrel is not prenuptial.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the gambrel is not prenuptial is correct if the fact that it is prenuptial and it does not whirl meltwater is not true.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it is prenuptial and it does not whirl meltwater is incorrect then the fact that it is prenuptial is incorrect is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the gambrel is prenuptial if the fact that it is prenuptial and it does not whirl meltwater is false. sent2: if that the gambrel is a bait and is not a terminal is incorrect then it is not a bait. sent3: the gambrel does not whirl meltwater if there is something such that the fact that it does curdle and it is a Parthian does not hold. sent4: the fact that the meltwater is Proustian thing that does not shoplift does not hold. sent5: the fact that the gambrel beads but it is not chyliferous is right. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is prenuptial thing that whirls meltwater is false it is not prenuptial. sent7: the gambrel does not whirl meltwater if there exists something such that it is not a Parthian. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is prenuptial and does not whirl meltwater is not true it is prenuptial. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is a continuo and does investigate jawan is not true. sent10: the gambrel does not curdle if that it does curdle and it is not a Idaho does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that that it does curdle and it is a Parthian is not right. sent12: the pollinium is non-viral. sent13: if the fact that the gambrel is prenuptial and does not ascend does not hold it is prenuptial. sent14: if the fact that the refractory is sacerdotal but it does not whirl meltwater is wrong then it is not sacerdotal. sent15: the countrywoman investigates blacksmith and is not a kind of a revenant. sent16: there is something such that it does curdle and it is Parthian. sent17: the gambrel is a kind of a ptyalith but it is not a kind of a bait. sent18: the gambrel is not a Andrew. sent19: there exists something such that if it is prenuptial and it does not whirl meltwater it is not prenuptial. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: the gambrel does not whirl meltwater.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gambrel is prenuptial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gambrel is prenuptial and does not whirl meltwater.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the gambrel is prenuptial and does not whirl meltwater is not true.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gambrel is not prenuptial.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the gambrel is not prenuptial is correct if the fact that it is prenuptial and it does not whirl meltwater is not true.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__