the fact that the haymaker does not lather fettuccine or it does not seel or both does not hold.
sent1: if there is something such that that it does not variegate and is not a separationism does not hold then the Nanticoke variegate. sent2: the fact that something does not lather falangist but it is transcendental is not correct if it is Jungian. sent3: the amiodarone is a kind of transcendental thing that is not a Jungian. sent4: that the aculeus is a Jungian is not wrong if the fact that the Nanticoke does variegate hold. sent5: the ureter is a kind of a Jungian if the aculeus is a kind of a Jungian. sent6: if there is something such that that it is non-cosmic thing that is not a bilby is not right the amiodarone does not lather fettuccine. sent7: if something is not cosmic or it is not careful or both it does denature. sent8: if the Tatar is not an isomer that it does not denaturalize Morrison is not wrong. sent9: that the beaver is not cosmic and it is not a bilby does not hold if the ureter is not transcendental. sent10: if something is cosmic then it is a bilby. sent11: the Tatar is not a kind of an isomer. sent12: if that something does not lather falangist and is transcendental is false it is not transcendental. sent13: if the haymaker is a bilby then the fact that the amiodarone is transcendental but it is not a kind of a Jungian does not hold. sent14: if the Tatar does not denaturalize Morrison then that it does not variegate and it is not a kind of a separationism does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the haymaker does not lather fettuccine or it does not seel or both.; sent10 -> int1: if the haymaker is not non-cosmic then it is a kind of a bilby.;
if the slope is not cosmic and/or is not careful then it denatures.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the haymaker does not lather fettuccine or it does not seel or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it does not variegate and is not a separationism does not hold then the Nanticoke variegate. sent2: the fact that something does not lather falangist but it is transcendental is not correct if it is Jungian. sent3: the amiodarone is a kind of transcendental thing that is not a Jungian. sent4: that the aculeus is a Jungian is not wrong if the fact that the Nanticoke does variegate hold. sent5: the ureter is a kind of a Jungian if the aculeus is a kind of a Jungian. sent6: if there is something such that that it is non-cosmic thing that is not a bilby is not right the amiodarone does not lather fettuccine. sent7: if something is not cosmic or it is not careful or both it does denature. sent8: if the Tatar is not an isomer that it does not denaturalize Morrison is not wrong. sent9: that the beaver is not cosmic and it is not a bilby does not hold if the ureter is not transcendental. sent10: if something is cosmic then it is a bilby. sent11: the Tatar is not a kind of an isomer. sent12: if that something does not lather falangist and is transcendental is false it is not transcendental. sent13: if the haymaker is a bilby then the fact that the amiodarone is transcendental but it is not a kind of a Jungian does not hold. sent14: if the Tatar does not denaturalize Morrison then that it does not variegate and it is not a kind of a separationism does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the haymaker does not lather fettuccine or it does not seel or both.; sent10 -> int1: if the haymaker is not non-cosmic then it is a kind of a bilby.; __UNKNOWN__