that the proprietariness does not occur is right.
sent1: the foreshowing privation occurs if the better happens. sent2: that the structuralness occurs hold. sent3: that the foreshowing privation occurs but the better does not occur is false if the proprietariness does not occur. sent4: the philologicalness happens. sent5: the proprietariness is brought about by that the foreshowing privation occurs. sent6: the Nelson happens. sent7: the fact that the foreshowing chinaware occurs and/or the evangelisticness does not occur is false. sent8: if the thermionicsness happens both the non-arenicolousness and the nonproprietaryness occurs. sent9: the narcoterrorism occurs. sent10: the foreshowing sexist and the betterness occurs. sent11: the foreshowing pyroscope is triggered by the foreshowing pyroscope and/or that the foreshowing sexist does not occur. sent12: the arenicolousness does not occur if that the foreshowing chinaware and/or the non-evangelisticness occurs is wrong. sent13: the foreshowing sexist happens. sent14: the justifying occurs and the infelicitousness happens. sent15: the hypothecating Rubinstein occurs. sent16: that the foreshowing privation does not occur is triggered by that both the non-arenicolousness and the thermionicsness occurs. sent17: the extravagance happens.
sent10 -> int1: the better happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the foreshowing privation happens.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the proprietariness does not occur.
sent12 & sent7 -> int3: the arenicolousness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the proprietariness does not occur is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the foreshowing privation occurs if the better happens. sent2: that the structuralness occurs hold. sent3: that the foreshowing privation occurs but the better does not occur is false if the proprietariness does not occur. sent4: the philologicalness happens. sent5: the proprietariness is brought about by that the foreshowing privation occurs. sent6: the Nelson happens. sent7: the fact that the foreshowing chinaware occurs and/or the evangelisticness does not occur is false. sent8: if the thermionicsness happens both the non-arenicolousness and the nonproprietaryness occurs. sent9: the narcoterrorism occurs. sent10: the foreshowing sexist and the betterness occurs. sent11: the foreshowing pyroscope is triggered by the foreshowing pyroscope and/or that the foreshowing sexist does not occur. sent12: the arenicolousness does not occur if that the foreshowing chinaware and/or the non-evangelisticness occurs is wrong. sent13: the foreshowing sexist happens. sent14: the justifying occurs and the infelicitousness happens. sent15: the hypothecating Rubinstein occurs. sent16: that the foreshowing privation does not occur is triggered by that both the non-arenicolousness and the thermionicsness occurs. sent17: the extravagance happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the better happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the foreshowing privation happens.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__