that the clarence is not wearable and is bibliothecal is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the clarence is wearable and is bibliothecal is false. sent2: if the fact that the rapier is Slavonic but it is not a matchwood does not hold then it is not bibliothecal. sent3: if the rapier is not a matchwood the fact that the clarence is wearable and is a matchwood does not hold. sent4: something is wearable and it is bibliothecal if it does not fold stridulation. sent5: the fact that the Ottawa is an express but it is not a thermoplastic is incorrect. sent6: the clarence does fold stridulation if the fact that the snailflower is a saturation is true. sent7: the fact that the rapier is not bibliothecal if the rapier is not Slavonic hold. sent8: if the rapier is not bibliothecal that the clarence is not wearable but it is not bibliothecal is wrong. sent9: that something is a saturation that is an armchair does not hold if it is not a sterol. sent10: there is nothing such that it is Slavonic thing that is not a kind of a matchwood. sent11: if that the Ottawa does express but it is not a thermoplastic does not hold it is not a sterol. sent12: the fact that the clarence is wearable and bibliothecal is incorrect if the rapier is not bibliothecal. sent13: if the snailflower is not a saturation or it is not nonmagnetic or both the clarence does not fold stridulation. sent14: the clarence is not hermeneutics if it is not Slavonic. sent15: the fact that the dealignment is not a matchwood but it is a piece is false if there are bibliothecal things. sent16: that the rapier is wearable and it is bibliothecal does not hold. sent17: the pyrolusite is not a saturation if that the Ottawa is a saturation and it is an armchair is wrong.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the rapier is not non-Slavonic but it is not a matchwood is not correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the rapier is not bibliothecal.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the clarence is not wearable but it is bibliothecal.
$hypothesis$ = that the clarence is not wearable and is bibliothecal is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the clarence is wearable and is bibliothecal is false. sent2: if the fact that the rapier is Slavonic but it is not a matchwood does not hold then it is not bibliothecal. sent3: if the rapier is not a matchwood the fact that the clarence is wearable and is a matchwood does not hold. sent4: something is wearable and it is bibliothecal if it does not fold stridulation. sent5: the fact that the Ottawa is an express but it is not a thermoplastic is incorrect. sent6: the clarence does fold stridulation if the fact that the snailflower is a saturation is true. sent7: the fact that the rapier is not bibliothecal if the rapier is not Slavonic hold. sent8: if the rapier is not bibliothecal that the clarence is not wearable but it is not bibliothecal is wrong. sent9: that something is a saturation that is an armchair does not hold if it is not a sterol. sent10: there is nothing such that it is Slavonic thing that is not a kind of a matchwood. sent11: if that the Ottawa does express but it is not a thermoplastic does not hold it is not a sterol. sent12: the fact that the clarence is wearable and bibliothecal is incorrect if the rapier is not bibliothecal. sent13: if the snailflower is not a saturation or it is not nonmagnetic or both the clarence does not fold stridulation. sent14: the clarence is not hermeneutics if it is not Slavonic. sent15: the fact that the dealignment is not a matchwood but it is a piece is false if there are bibliothecal things. sent16: that the rapier is wearable and it is bibliothecal does not hold. sent17: the pyrolusite is not a saturation if that the Ottawa is a saturation and it is an armchair is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the rapier is not non-Slavonic but it is not a matchwood is not correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the rapier is not bibliothecal.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__