the fact that the midiron glares metalwork and is calligraphic hold.
sent1: if the stateroom is nonrepresentational then the midiron does glare metalwork. sent2: that if that something is nonrepresentational and it is a kind of a lagomorph is incorrect then it does not glare stateroom is correct. sent3: if the Stayman is cybernetic then the fact that the defense is not a high-mindedness is not false. sent4: if the stateroom is nonrepresentational then the defense does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe and it is not a lagomorph. sent5: if something does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe then the fact that it is a kind of nonrepresentational thing that is a lagomorph is not right. sent6: the midiron is not a high-mindedness if that the Stayman is not an antique but calligraphic is not true. sent7: something glares metalwork or is nonrepresentational or both if it is not a lagomorph. sent8: if the stateroom does not glare stateroom then that the defense does not glare stateroom and is cybernetic does not hold. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does concoct Dutchman's-pipe is not wrong then the midiron is not a Cambodian. sent10: the midiron glares metalwork if the stateroom does glares metalwork. sent11: the fact that the Stayman does geminate claimant is not false if it is a high-mindedness. sent12: if something is a greeter then it is calligraphic. sent13: something is a greeter if the fact that it does concoct Dutchman's-pipe and it is not a Cambodian is not true. sent14: if the stateroom is not a Cambodian that the midiron does glare metalwork and it is calligraphic does not hold. sent15: that that the stateroom does not geminate defense and it is not a toiletry is not correct is right. sent16: if something does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe it is both not non-Cambodian and a greeter. sent17: something is a kind of a high-mindedness if it is an antique. sent18: if the defense does not geminate claimant that the midiron does concoct Dutchman's-pipe but it is not a Cambodian is false. sent19: the defense does concoct Dutchman's-pipe or it is a kind of a Rutland or both if there exists something such that it is not a greeter. sent20: if the fact that the stateroom does not geminate defense and it is not a toiletry is not right then it geminate defense. sent21: if something is not representational it is a kind of a lagomorph. sent22: the Stayman is an antique. sent23: the stateroom does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe if it is a kind of a greeter or is a Cambodian or both. sent24: if that the defense does not glare stateroom and is cybernetic is not correct then the Stayman does not geminate claimant. sent25: if the stateroom geminates defense that it does not glare stateroom and is not cybernetic is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stateroom is Cambodian.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the stateroom is a greeter and/or it is Cambodian hold.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the stateroom does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe.; sent5 -> int3: if that the stateroom does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe is correct then the fact that it is nonrepresentational and it is a lagomorph is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the stateroom is a kind of nonrepresentational thing that is a lagomorph is not true.; sent2 -> int5: if that the stateroom is not representational and it is a kind of a lagomorph is incorrect then it does not glare stateroom.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stateroom does not glare stateroom.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the defense does not glare stateroom but it is cybernetic is not right.; int7 & sent24 -> int8: the Stayman does not geminate claimant.; sent17 -> int9: the Stayman is a kind of a high-mindedness if it is an antique.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the Stayman is a high-mindedness.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the Stayman does geminate claimant is true.; int8 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> int13: that the stateroom is not Cambodian is not wrong.; int13 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the defense does concoct Dutchman's-pipe and/or it is a Rutland.
sent21 -> int14: if the stateroom is nonrepresentational it is a lagomorph.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the midiron glares metalwork and is calligraphic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stateroom is nonrepresentational then the midiron does glare metalwork. sent2: that if that something is nonrepresentational and it is a kind of a lagomorph is incorrect then it does not glare stateroom is correct. sent3: if the Stayman is cybernetic then the fact that the defense is not a high-mindedness is not false. sent4: if the stateroom is nonrepresentational then the defense does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe and it is not a lagomorph. sent5: if something does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe then the fact that it is a kind of nonrepresentational thing that is a lagomorph is not right. sent6: the midiron is not a high-mindedness if that the Stayman is not an antique but calligraphic is not true. sent7: something glares metalwork or is nonrepresentational or both if it is not a lagomorph. sent8: if the stateroom does not glare stateroom then that the defense does not glare stateroom and is cybernetic does not hold. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does concoct Dutchman's-pipe is not wrong then the midiron is not a Cambodian. sent10: the midiron glares metalwork if the stateroom does glares metalwork. sent11: the fact that the Stayman does geminate claimant is not false if it is a high-mindedness. sent12: if something is a greeter then it is calligraphic. sent13: something is a greeter if the fact that it does concoct Dutchman's-pipe and it is not a Cambodian is not true. sent14: if the stateroom is not a Cambodian that the midiron does glare metalwork and it is calligraphic does not hold. sent15: that that the stateroom does not geminate defense and it is not a toiletry is not correct is right. sent16: if something does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe it is both not non-Cambodian and a greeter. sent17: something is a kind of a high-mindedness if it is an antique. sent18: if the defense does not geminate claimant that the midiron does concoct Dutchman's-pipe but it is not a Cambodian is false. sent19: the defense does concoct Dutchman's-pipe or it is a kind of a Rutland or both if there exists something such that it is not a greeter. sent20: if the fact that the stateroom does not geminate defense and it is not a toiletry is not right then it geminate defense. sent21: if something is not representational it is a kind of a lagomorph. sent22: the Stayman is an antique. sent23: the stateroom does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe if it is a kind of a greeter or is a Cambodian or both. sent24: if that the defense does not glare stateroom and is cybernetic is not correct then the Stayman does not geminate claimant. sent25: if the stateroom geminates defense that it does not glare stateroom and is not cybernetic is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stateroom is Cambodian.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the stateroom is a greeter and/or it is Cambodian hold.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the stateroom does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe.; sent5 -> int3: if that the stateroom does not concoct Dutchman's-pipe is correct then the fact that it is nonrepresentational and it is a lagomorph is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the stateroom is a kind of nonrepresentational thing that is a lagomorph is not true.; sent2 -> int5: if that the stateroom is not representational and it is a kind of a lagomorph is incorrect then it does not glare stateroom.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stateroom does not glare stateroom.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the defense does not glare stateroom but it is cybernetic is not right.; int7 & sent24 -> int8: the Stayman does not geminate claimant.; sent17 -> int9: the Stayman is a kind of a high-mindedness if it is an antique.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the Stayman is a high-mindedness.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the Stayman does geminate claimant is true.; int8 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> int13: that the stateroom is not Cambodian is not wrong.; int13 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__