the inosine does proofread.
sent1: if the fact that the Breton is a Essene or does not vaticinate or both is not true the luminary discountenances misconstrual. sent2: something is palatable. sent3: the inosine does vaticinate if the luminary does proofread. sent4: something is not Essene. sent5: the luminary does vaticinate if the fact that the Breton is not a kind of a Essene or it does not discountenance misconstrual or both does not hold. sent6: the Breton is a Essene if it does vaticinate. sent7: if the fluff is a Essene the fact that the Breton either is not Essene or does not discountenance misconstrual or both is false. sent8: the fact that either the Breton is a Wylie or it is not a kind of a Essene or both is not correct. sent9: the Breton does holler. sent10: there is something such that it is palatable and it is not living. sent11: that if something that is not unpalatable is not living the effluvium is a Lilith is not wrong. sent12: that either something hollers or it is not a moonlighter or both is not correct if it is a Lilith. sent13: if the luminary vaticinates then the inosine proof reads. sent14: if the luminary does vaticinate that either it is a Essene or it is not a kind of a Lilith or both is incorrect. sent15: if the fact that either the effluvium hollers or it is not a moonlighter or both is wrong then the fact that the fluff is Essene hold. sent16: the fact that the effluvium proof reads hold. sent17: the inosine hollers.
sent12 -> int1: if the effluvium is a kind of a Lilith that it either does holler or is not a moonlighter or both is incorrect.; sent10 & sent11 -> int2: the effluvium is a kind of a Lilith.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the effluvium does holler and/or is not a moonlighter is not false does not hold.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the fluff is Essene.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that either the Breton is not a kind of a Essene or it does not discountenance misconstrual or both is incorrect.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the luminary does vaticinate.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the inosine does proofread. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Breton is a Essene or does not vaticinate or both is not true the luminary discountenances misconstrual. sent2: something is palatable. sent3: the inosine does vaticinate if the luminary does proofread. sent4: something is not Essene. sent5: the luminary does vaticinate if the fact that the Breton is not a kind of a Essene or it does not discountenance misconstrual or both does not hold. sent6: the Breton is a Essene if it does vaticinate. sent7: if the fluff is a Essene the fact that the Breton either is not Essene or does not discountenance misconstrual or both is false. sent8: the fact that either the Breton is a Wylie or it is not a kind of a Essene or both is not correct. sent9: the Breton does holler. sent10: there is something such that it is palatable and it is not living. sent11: that if something that is not unpalatable is not living the effluvium is a Lilith is not wrong. sent12: that either something hollers or it is not a moonlighter or both is not correct if it is a Lilith. sent13: if the luminary vaticinates then the inosine proof reads. sent14: if the luminary does vaticinate that either it is a Essene or it is not a kind of a Lilith or both is incorrect. sent15: if the fact that either the effluvium hollers or it is not a moonlighter or both is wrong then the fact that the fluff is Essene hold. sent16: the fact that the effluvium proof reads hold. sent17: the inosine hollers. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the effluvium is a kind of a Lilith that it either does holler or is not a moonlighter or both is incorrect.; sent10 & sent11 -> int2: the effluvium is a kind of a Lilith.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the effluvium does holler and/or is not a moonlighter is not false does not hold.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the fluff is Essene.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that either the Breton is not a kind of a Essene or it does not discountenance misconstrual or both is incorrect.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the luminary does vaticinate.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__