there exists something such that that it does not bespangle anamorphism and it is not scriptural is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a bog. sent2: if there exists something such that it does scald bravura the fact that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism and it is not scriptural is false. sent3: that the shirtmaker does bespangle anamorphism and is not scriptural is wrong if the fact that something scalds bravura hold. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does not bespangle anamorphism and it is scriptural is incorrect. sent5: the anamorphism is a doorkeeper. sent6: if something does bespangle anamorphism that the antineutron is not scriptural and it does not scald bravura is false. sent7: that something does not destine shirtmaker and does not scald Gulliver is incorrect if it does not scald bravura. sent8: The bravura scalds antineutron. sent9: the fact that the shirtmaker does bespangle anamorphism but it is not scriptural is false. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it does scald bravura hold the fact that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism but it is scriptural is false. sent11: the fact that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism and is scriptural does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it does bespangle anamorphism and is not scriptural is not right. sent13: there exists something such that it does not bespangle anamorphism and it is not scriptural. sent14: there is something such that it is a moderationist. sent15: if that something does not confide and it does not bespangle anamorphism does not hold then it does confide. sent16: if there exists something such that it is scriptural the fact that the antineutron does not bespangle anamorphism and it does not scald bravura is not right. sent17: if there exists something such that it is scriptural that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism but it does scald bravura does not hold. sent18: if that something is scriptural is not incorrect then the fact that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism and does not scald bravura does not hold.
the fact that the there confides is not incorrect.
sent15 -> int1: if the fact that the fact that the there does not confide and does not bespangle anamorphism does not hold is true that it confide hold.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does not bespangle anamorphism and it is not scriptural is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a bog. sent2: if there exists something such that it does scald bravura the fact that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism and it is not scriptural is false. sent3: that the shirtmaker does bespangle anamorphism and is not scriptural is wrong if the fact that something scalds bravura hold. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does not bespangle anamorphism and it is scriptural is incorrect. sent5: the anamorphism is a doorkeeper. sent6: if something does bespangle anamorphism that the antineutron is not scriptural and it does not scald bravura is false. sent7: that something does not destine shirtmaker and does not scald Gulliver is incorrect if it does not scald bravura. sent8: The bravura scalds antineutron. sent9: the fact that the shirtmaker does bespangle anamorphism but it is not scriptural is false. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it does scald bravura hold the fact that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism but it is scriptural is false. sent11: the fact that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism and is scriptural does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it does bespangle anamorphism and is not scriptural is not right. sent13: there exists something such that it does not bespangle anamorphism and it is not scriptural. sent14: there is something such that it is a moderationist. sent15: if that something does not confide and it does not bespangle anamorphism does not hold then it does confide. sent16: if there exists something such that it is scriptural the fact that the antineutron does not bespangle anamorphism and it does not scald bravura is not right. sent17: if there exists something such that it is scriptural that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism but it does scald bravura does not hold. sent18: if that something is scriptural is not incorrect then the fact that the shirtmaker does not bespangle anamorphism and does not scald bravura does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__