the defacement happens.
sent1: the Alpinism occurs. sent2: the dogmaticness occurs. sent3: if the goldbrick does not occur the moksa does not occur. sent4: that the Carolineness and the hydroxiness happens is incorrect if the plebiscite does not occur. sent5: if that the Delphicness does not occur and the arteriolarness does not occur is not correct the plebiscite does not occur. sent6: the convoy occurs and the Alpinism occurs if the alienation does not occur. sent7: the moksa does not occur. sent8: that the Delphicness does not occur and the arteriolarness does not occur is not true if that the juddering does not occur is correct. sent9: the moksa does not occur if the fact that the moksa occurs but the goldbrick does not occur is false. sent10: both the wrapping signpost and the Omaniness happens if the fact that the Tuscanness does not occur is correct. sent11: the grace does not occur if the fact that the wrapping signpost occurs is not incorrect. sent12: if the moksa happens that that the goldbrick does not occur and the multivalentness does not occur hold is not true. sent13: that not the nightlife but the operativeness happens is not correct if the dogmaticness does not occur. sent14: that the juddering does not occur is caused by that both the endodonticsness and the non-riblessness occurs. sent15: the alienation does not occur if that the fact that the alienation happens and the hungering diabolatry does not occur is correct does not hold. sent16: if that the dogmaticness occurs and the defacement occurs hold then the multivalentness does not occur. sent17: if the fact that that not the convoying but the goldbrick happens does not hold is not false then the fact that the goldbrick does not occur is not false. sent18: that the alienation occurs and the hungering diabolatry does not occur is not true if the fact that the grace does not occur is right. sent19: if the goldbrick does not occur then the fact that the non-multivalentness or the moksa or both happens is false. sent20: if that both the Carolineness and the hydroxiness occurs is not true the Tuscan does not occur. sent21: if the Alpinism occurs that the convoy does not occur but the goldbrick occurs does not hold. sent22: if the convoying occurs that the moksa happens but the goldbrick does not occur is wrong. sent23: if that the fact that the dogmaticness happens and the defacement does not occur does not hold hold then the defacement occurs. sent24: the Alpinism does not occur and the alienation does not occur if the grace does not occur. sent25: the hungering diabolatry triggers that the grace does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the defacement happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the dogmaticness occurs and the defacement occurs.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the multivalentness does not occur.; int2 -> int3: either the multivalentness does not occur or the moksa happens or both.; sent21 & sent1 -> int4: that not the convoy but the goldbrick occurs is not true.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the goldbrick does not occur is not wrong.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: that either the non-multivalentness or the moksa or both happens is wrong.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the defacement happens.
$hypothesis$ = the defacement happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the Alpinism occurs. sent2: the dogmaticness occurs. sent3: if the goldbrick does not occur the moksa does not occur. sent4: that the Carolineness and the hydroxiness happens is incorrect if the plebiscite does not occur. sent5: if that the Delphicness does not occur and the arteriolarness does not occur is not correct the plebiscite does not occur. sent6: the convoy occurs and the Alpinism occurs if the alienation does not occur. sent7: the moksa does not occur. sent8: that the Delphicness does not occur and the arteriolarness does not occur is not true if that the juddering does not occur is correct. sent9: the moksa does not occur if the fact that the moksa occurs but the goldbrick does not occur is false. sent10: both the wrapping signpost and the Omaniness happens if the fact that the Tuscanness does not occur is correct. sent11: the grace does not occur if the fact that the wrapping signpost occurs is not incorrect. sent12: if the moksa happens that that the goldbrick does not occur and the multivalentness does not occur hold is not true. sent13: that not the nightlife but the operativeness happens is not correct if the dogmaticness does not occur. sent14: that the juddering does not occur is caused by that both the endodonticsness and the non-riblessness occurs. sent15: the alienation does not occur if that the fact that the alienation happens and the hungering diabolatry does not occur is correct does not hold. sent16: if that the dogmaticness occurs and the defacement occurs hold then the multivalentness does not occur. sent17: if the fact that that not the convoying but the goldbrick happens does not hold is not false then the fact that the goldbrick does not occur is not false. sent18: that the alienation occurs and the hungering diabolatry does not occur is not true if the fact that the grace does not occur is right. sent19: if the goldbrick does not occur then the fact that the non-multivalentness or the moksa or both happens is false. sent20: if that both the Carolineness and the hydroxiness occurs is not true the Tuscan does not occur. sent21: if the Alpinism occurs that the convoy does not occur but the goldbrick occurs does not hold. sent22: if the convoying occurs that the moksa happens but the goldbrick does not occur is wrong. sent23: if that the fact that the dogmaticness happens and the defacement does not occur does not hold hold then the defacement occurs. sent24: the Alpinism does not occur and the alienation does not occur if the grace does not occur. sent25: the hungering diabolatry triggers that the grace does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the defacement happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the dogmaticness occurs and the defacement occurs.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the multivalentness does not occur.; int2 -> int3: either the multivalentness does not occur or the moksa happens or both.; sent21 & sent1 -> int4: that not the convoy but the goldbrick occurs is not true.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the goldbrick does not occur is not wrong.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: that either the non-multivalentness or the moksa or both happens is wrong.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__