the fact that if the reflexology does not occur the multiphaseness happens and the hysterectomy occurs does not hold.
sent1: the interoceptiveness happens. sent2: the nonacceptance happens. sent3: the wash does not occur. sent4: the extending Secretariat happens. sent5: if the reflexology happens then both the multiphaseness and the hysterectomy happens. sent6: the glycogenicness does not occur. sent7: the hysterectomy and the nonacceptance happens if the glycogenicness does not occur. sent8: the nudism and the restrictiveness occurs. sent9: the sliming chestnut happens. sent10: the multiphaseness occurs if the dripping does not occur and the extending Secretariat occurs. sent11: if the glycogenicness does not occur the fact that the nonacceptance happens is not wrong. sent12: if that the extending settle does not occur is true then the diabaticness happens. sent13: the biogeneticness does not occur. sent14: both the bonfire and the sliming buckskin occurs if the Rabelaisianness does not occur. sent15: the dripping is prevented by that the reflexology but not the biogeneticness occurs. sent16: that the dripping occurs is prevented by that the reflexology does not occur and the biogeneticness does not occur. sent17: the extending fustian does not occur and the dangerousness does not occur. sent18: the endeavoring happens. sent19: the fact that the underwriting paraphysis happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reflexology does not occur.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the reflexology does not occur and the biogeneticness does not occur.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the dripping does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the dripping does not occur and the extending Secretariat occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the multiphaseness occurs.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: both the hysterectomy and the nonacceptance happens.; int5 -> int6: the hysterectomy occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: both the multiphaseness and the hysterectomy occurs.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the reflexology does not occur the multiphaseness happens and the hysterectomy occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the interoceptiveness happens. sent2: the nonacceptance happens. sent3: the wash does not occur. sent4: the extending Secretariat happens. sent5: if the reflexology happens then both the multiphaseness and the hysterectomy happens. sent6: the glycogenicness does not occur. sent7: the hysterectomy and the nonacceptance happens if the glycogenicness does not occur. sent8: the nudism and the restrictiveness occurs. sent9: the sliming chestnut happens. sent10: the multiphaseness occurs if the dripping does not occur and the extending Secretariat occurs. sent11: if the glycogenicness does not occur the fact that the nonacceptance happens is not wrong. sent12: if that the extending settle does not occur is true then the diabaticness happens. sent13: the biogeneticness does not occur. sent14: both the bonfire and the sliming buckskin occurs if the Rabelaisianness does not occur. sent15: the dripping is prevented by that the reflexology but not the biogeneticness occurs. sent16: that the dripping occurs is prevented by that the reflexology does not occur and the biogeneticness does not occur. sent17: the extending fustian does not occur and the dangerousness does not occur. sent18: the endeavoring happens. sent19: the fact that the underwriting paraphysis happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reflexology does not occur.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the reflexology does not occur and the biogeneticness does not occur.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the dripping does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the dripping does not occur and the extending Secretariat occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the multiphaseness occurs.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: both the hysterectomy and the nonacceptance happens.; int5 -> int6: the hysterectomy occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: both the multiphaseness and the hysterectomy occurs.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__