the featheredge is non-Keynesian.
sent1: if the ulna does add gentile then the featheredge is ischemic. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not a decisiveness and severalizes yataghan is wrong then the cellarage is Democratic. sent3: the pessimist does not add gearbox. sent4: the pessimist adds gearbox if something that is not a decisiveness severalizes yataghan. sent5: if the cellarage is Democratic then that the ulna adds gentile is correct. sent6: The gearbox does not add pessimist. sent7: the featheredge is not Keynesian if it is ischemic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the babbitt is not a decisiveness and does severalize yataghan.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a decisiveness and it does severalize yataghan.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the pessimist adds gearbox.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the babbitt is not a decisiveness and does severalize yataghan is not true.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a decisiveness and does severalize yataghan is not true.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the cellarage is Democratic.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the ulna adds gentile.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the featheredge is ischemic.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the featheredge is non-Keynesian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ulna does add gentile then the featheredge is ischemic. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not a decisiveness and severalizes yataghan is wrong then the cellarage is Democratic. sent3: the pessimist does not add gearbox. sent4: the pessimist adds gearbox if something that is not a decisiveness severalizes yataghan. sent5: if the cellarage is Democratic then that the ulna adds gentile is correct. sent6: The gearbox does not add pessimist. sent7: the featheredge is not Keynesian if it is ischemic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the babbitt is not a decisiveness and does severalize yataghan.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a decisiveness and it does severalize yataghan.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the pessimist adds gearbox.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the babbitt is not a decisiveness and does severalize yataghan is not true.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a decisiveness and does severalize yataghan is not true.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the cellarage is Democratic.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the ulna adds gentile.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the featheredge is ischemic.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__