the vulva is dural.
sent1: the hajji is not a heir-at-law if that it is not a Pennsylvanian and is not Churchillian does not hold. sent2: something is not a kind of a philosopher if it is not a Zanzibar. sent3: the vulva fares. sent4: if the fact that the warbler is not a Orlando is not wrong that it crystallizes statuary and welds Kabul is false. sent5: the vulva is not a heir-at-law if something is not a kind of a heir-at-law and/or is a Orlando. sent6: there is something such that it is Churchillian. sent7: the slash does not crystallize sombrero. sent8: something is not Churchillian if the fact that it is a Pennsylvanian and/or it relines algidity is wrong. sent9: if the hajji is not a heir-at-law the fact that it is not geophysical hold. sent10: either something is not a heir-at-law or it is a kind of a Orlando or both if it is not a kind of a fare. sent11: the warbler does not weld Kabul. sent12: the slash is not a kind of a Zanzibar and/or it does not sunburn if it does not crystallize sombrero. sent13: that something crystallizes statuary but it does not weld Kabul is incorrect if it is not a Orlando. sent14: the vulva is geophysical. sent15: the packsaddle is a whisker if it is hornless. sent16: if the hajji is a kind of a Orlando the vulva crystallizes amendment. sent17: the warbler is not geophysical if it is a fare and a Orlando. sent18: something is not a kind of a philosopher if it is not a sunburn. sent19: the warbler does fare if it is Churchillian. sent20: if there exists something such that it is Churchillian then the warbler is a heir-at-law and/or Churchillian. sent21: the warbler crystallizes statuary but it does not weld Kabul. sent22: the warbler is a kind of a fare if it is a kind of a heir-at-law. sent23: if something is not a philosopher that it is a kind of a Pennsylvanian and/or relines algidity is wrong. sent24: the vulva is dural and is geophysical if the warbler is not geophysical. sent25: if the fact that the buttocks is Voltarian and it is a kind of a churchgoer is true it is not geophysical. sent26: if something is not Churchillian the fact that it is both not geophysical and non-dural is wrong. sent27: the hajji does not fare if there exists something such that that it is both non-geophysical and not dural does not hold.
sent13 -> int1: that the warbler crystallizes statuary but it does not weld Kabul does not hold if it is not a kind of a Orlando.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the warbler is not a Orlando is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the warbler crystallizes statuary and does not weld Kabul is wrong.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the warbler is a Orlando.; sent6 & sent20 -> int5: the warbler is a heir-at-law or is Churchillian or both.; int5 & sent22 & sent19 -> int6: the warbler is a fare.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the warbler is a kind of a fare and it is a kind of a Orlando.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the warbler is not geophysical.; int8 & sent24 -> int9: the vulva is dural and it is geophysical.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the vulva is not a heir-at-law.
sent10 -> int10: if the hajji is not a fare then it is not a heir-at-law or it is a Orlando or both.; sent26 -> int11: the fact that the fact that the slash is not geophysical and it is not dural is not wrong is not right if it is not Churchillian.; sent8 -> int12: if that either the slash is a Pennsylvanian or it relines algidity or both is not correct then it is not Churchillian.; sent23 -> int13: if the slash is not a kind of a philosopher then that either it is a Pennsylvanian or it relines algidity or both is false.; sent12 & sent7 -> int14: the slash is not a Zanzibar and/or it does not sunburn.; sent2 -> int15: if the slash is not a Zanzibar it is not a philosopher.; sent18 -> int16: if the slash is not a kind of a sunburn then it is not a kind of a philosopher.; int14 & int15 & int16 -> int17: the slash is not a philosopher.; int13 & int17 -> int18: that the slash either is a kind of a Pennsylvanian or relines algidity or both is incorrect.; int12 & int18 -> int19: the slash is not Churchillian.; int11 & int19 -> int20: the fact that the slash is not geophysical and it is not dural is incorrect.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that the fact that it is not geophysical and is not dural is incorrect.; int21 & sent27 -> int22: the hajji is not a kind of a fare.; int10 & int22 -> int23: the hajji either is not a kind of a heir-at-law or is a kind of a Orlando or both.; int23 -> int24: that something is not a heir-at-law and/or it is a Orlando is correct.; int24 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the vulva is dural. ; $context$ = sent1: the hajji is not a heir-at-law if that it is not a Pennsylvanian and is not Churchillian does not hold. sent2: something is not a kind of a philosopher if it is not a Zanzibar. sent3: the vulva fares. sent4: if the fact that the warbler is not a Orlando is not wrong that it crystallizes statuary and welds Kabul is false. sent5: the vulva is not a heir-at-law if something is not a kind of a heir-at-law and/or is a Orlando. sent6: there is something such that it is Churchillian. sent7: the slash does not crystallize sombrero. sent8: something is not Churchillian if the fact that it is a Pennsylvanian and/or it relines algidity is wrong. sent9: if the hajji is not a heir-at-law the fact that it is not geophysical hold. sent10: either something is not a heir-at-law or it is a kind of a Orlando or both if it is not a kind of a fare. sent11: the warbler does not weld Kabul. sent12: the slash is not a kind of a Zanzibar and/or it does not sunburn if it does not crystallize sombrero. sent13: that something crystallizes statuary but it does not weld Kabul is incorrect if it is not a Orlando. sent14: the vulva is geophysical. sent15: the packsaddle is a whisker if it is hornless. sent16: if the hajji is a kind of a Orlando the vulva crystallizes amendment. sent17: the warbler is not geophysical if it is a fare and a Orlando. sent18: something is not a kind of a philosopher if it is not a sunburn. sent19: the warbler does fare if it is Churchillian. sent20: if there exists something such that it is Churchillian then the warbler is a heir-at-law and/or Churchillian. sent21: the warbler crystallizes statuary but it does not weld Kabul. sent22: the warbler is a kind of a fare if it is a kind of a heir-at-law. sent23: if something is not a philosopher that it is a kind of a Pennsylvanian and/or relines algidity is wrong. sent24: the vulva is dural and is geophysical if the warbler is not geophysical. sent25: if the fact that the buttocks is Voltarian and it is a kind of a churchgoer is true it is not geophysical. sent26: if something is not Churchillian the fact that it is both not geophysical and non-dural is wrong. sent27: the hajji does not fare if there exists something such that that it is both non-geophysical and not dural does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: that the warbler crystallizes statuary but it does not weld Kabul does not hold if it is not a kind of a Orlando.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the warbler is not a Orlando is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the warbler crystallizes statuary and does not weld Kabul is wrong.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the warbler is a Orlando.; sent6 & sent20 -> int5: the warbler is a heir-at-law or is Churchillian or both.; int5 & sent22 & sent19 -> int6: the warbler is a fare.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the warbler is a kind of a fare and it is a kind of a Orlando.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the warbler is not geophysical.; int8 & sent24 -> int9: the vulva is dural and it is geophysical.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__