that the Sellotape is congruous and/or it is not a chigger is not true.
sent1: something condoles meniscus and/or is robotics if it does not concern Ostrya. sent2: there is nothing such that it is not robotics and it does condole meniscus. sent3: if that the conglomerate does not concern Ostrya but it is robotics does not hold then it is not congruous. sent4: the fact that the meniscus condoles meniscus is not incorrect. sent5: the Sellotape either is congruous or is not a kind of a chigger or both if the conglomerate is not congruous. sent6: there exists something such that it is chaetognathan. sent7: that the conglomerate does not concern Ostrya but it is robotics is not true if the meniscus is robotics. sent8: The fact that the meniscus condoles meniscus is not incorrect. sent9: the meniscus is not a kind of a chigger if the conglomerate is not a chigger and does not condole meniscus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meniscus is not robotics.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the meniscus is not robotics but it condoles meniscus.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the meniscus is not robotics but it does condole meniscus is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the meniscus is robotics.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: that the conglomerate does not concern Ostrya but it is robotics is wrong.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the conglomerate is not congruous.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the Sellotape either is congruous or is not a chigger or both does not hold.
sent1 -> int7: if the meniscus does not concern Ostrya it condoles meniscus and/or it is robotics.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Sellotape is congruous and/or it is not a chigger is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something condoles meniscus and/or is robotics if it does not concern Ostrya. sent2: there is nothing such that it is not robotics and it does condole meniscus. sent3: if that the conglomerate does not concern Ostrya but it is robotics does not hold then it is not congruous. sent4: the fact that the meniscus condoles meniscus is not incorrect. sent5: the Sellotape either is congruous or is not a kind of a chigger or both if the conglomerate is not congruous. sent6: there exists something such that it is chaetognathan. sent7: that the conglomerate does not concern Ostrya but it is robotics is not true if the meniscus is robotics. sent8: The fact that the meniscus condoles meniscus is not incorrect. sent9: the meniscus is not a kind of a chigger if the conglomerate is not a chigger and does not condole meniscus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meniscus is not robotics.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the meniscus is not robotics but it condoles meniscus.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the meniscus is not robotics but it does condole meniscus is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the meniscus is robotics.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: that the conglomerate does not concern Ostrya but it is robotics is wrong.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the conglomerate is not congruous.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__