the intervenor is anecdotal.
sent1: if the clone does conserve the vasoconstrictor does not scent copyholder and runs DS. sent2: the trypsin does not run DS. sent3: if the fact that something is not a conserve and it is not inoffensive is not correct it does not run DS. sent4: the fact that the trypsin prophesies and it is inoffensive is incorrect. sent5: if the cityscape is not anecdotal then that the intervenor is a Wuhan and is not anecdotal is wrong. sent6: if the cityscape does not service paradox and is offensive then the fact that the intervenor is not anecdotal is not false. sent7: the clone conserves if that the snakewood is not a kind of a conserves but it compels seasickness is not correct. sent8: that the cityscape scents copyholder is true if it is inoffensive. sent9: something is not inoffensive if the fact that it is both not a Wuhan and not tearful is incorrect. sent10: the cityscape is not inoffensive if it is a Wuhan. sent11: the cityscape does prophesy if that the trypsin either does not prophesy or is not an ermine or both is incorrect. sent12: if something does prophesy it does not service paradox and it is not inoffensive. sent13: that the trypsin does prophesy and is not inoffensive is incorrect if that the cityscape is not inoffensive is right. sent14: that the trypsin does prophesy and is inoffensive does not hold if the cityscape is not inoffensive. sent15: if something is an elf it is a nearness. sent16: the fact that the cityscape is not a Wuhan and is not tearful is not right if the intervenor does not service paradox. sent17: if the trypsin is not a conserve then it does not run DS and scents copyholder. sent18: the cityscape is not a Wuhan and is inoffensive if it does not scent copyholder. sent19: the trypsin is a kind of an ermine if the fact that it prophesies and is not inoffensive is not correct. sent20: if something does service paradox then it is anecdotal. sent21: the trypsin does not scent copyholder if the vasoconstrictor does not scent copyholder but it runs DS. sent22: the trypsin is not an ermine if it does not run DS and it does scent copyholder. sent23: the fact that the fact that the cityscape is a Wuhan but it is not tearful is incorrect is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intervenor does not service paradox.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that the cityscape is not a Wuhan and not tearful is wrong.; sent9 -> int2: the cityscape is not inoffensive if that it is both not a Wuhan and not tearful is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cityscape is not inoffensive.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: that that the trypsin does prophesy and is not inoffensive is wrong is correct.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the trypsin is an ermine.; sent20 -> int6: if the intervenor does service paradox then that it is anecdotal hold.;
the fact that the intervenor is not anecdotal is right.
sent12 -> int7: the cityscape does not service paradox and is offensive if it prophesies.;
$hypothesis$ = the intervenor is anecdotal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the clone does conserve the vasoconstrictor does not scent copyholder and runs DS. sent2: the trypsin does not run DS. sent3: if the fact that something is not a conserve and it is not inoffensive is not correct it does not run DS. sent4: the fact that the trypsin prophesies and it is inoffensive is incorrect. sent5: if the cityscape is not anecdotal then that the intervenor is a Wuhan and is not anecdotal is wrong. sent6: if the cityscape does not service paradox and is offensive then the fact that the intervenor is not anecdotal is not false. sent7: the clone conserves if that the snakewood is not a kind of a conserves but it compels seasickness is not correct. sent8: that the cityscape scents copyholder is true if it is inoffensive. sent9: something is not inoffensive if the fact that it is both not a Wuhan and not tearful is incorrect. sent10: the cityscape is not inoffensive if it is a Wuhan. sent11: the cityscape does prophesy if that the trypsin either does not prophesy or is not an ermine or both is incorrect. sent12: if something does prophesy it does not service paradox and it is not inoffensive. sent13: that the trypsin does prophesy and is not inoffensive is incorrect if that the cityscape is not inoffensive is right. sent14: that the trypsin does prophesy and is inoffensive does not hold if the cityscape is not inoffensive. sent15: if something is an elf it is a nearness. sent16: the fact that the cityscape is not a Wuhan and is not tearful is not right if the intervenor does not service paradox. sent17: if the trypsin is not a conserve then it does not run DS and scents copyholder. sent18: the cityscape is not a Wuhan and is inoffensive if it does not scent copyholder. sent19: the trypsin is a kind of an ermine if the fact that it prophesies and is not inoffensive is not correct. sent20: if something does service paradox then it is anecdotal. sent21: the trypsin does not scent copyholder if the vasoconstrictor does not scent copyholder but it runs DS. sent22: the trypsin is not an ermine if it does not run DS and it does scent copyholder. sent23: the fact that the fact that the cityscape is a Wuhan but it is not tearful is incorrect is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intervenor does not service paradox.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that the cityscape is not a Wuhan and not tearful is wrong.; sent9 -> int2: the cityscape is not inoffensive if that it is both not a Wuhan and not tearful is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cityscape is not inoffensive.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: that that the trypsin does prophesy and is not inoffensive is wrong is correct.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the trypsin is an ermine.; sent20 -> int6: if the intervenor does service paradox then that it is anecdotal hold.; __UNKNOWN__