the pteridophyte is a parasympathetic and it does loot selva.
sent1: something that is not a kind of a Phanerozoic and/or is not a kind of a Southeast is not caffeinic. sent2: if something is a parasympathetic it is exhaustible. sent3: the fact that the cine-film is a Phanerozoic hold. sent4: the cine-film is a combretum if that the starfish is not a topsail is correct. sent5: that the stop is exhaustible if the pteridophyte is exhaustible is not false. sent6: if something that is a combretum does not loot isopod then that it is parasympathetic is not false. sent7: if something is a Phanerozoic then it does loot isopod. sent8: the archdiocese does not disjoint and is not non-appropriative. sent9: the pteridophyte is not a Phanerozoic or not a Southeast or both if the sturgeon is not malodorous. sent10: if the cine-film does not loot selva the fact that the pteridophyte is a parasympathetic that does loot selva is wrong. sent11: if something is not inexhaustible and it does loot isopod it does not loot selva. sent12: the starfish is not caffeinic or casts stockbroker or both. sent13: that the pteridophyte is a combretum that does not loot isopod is correct if that it is not a kind of a topsail is correct. sent14: the starfish is not a topsail if the fact that either it is not caffeinic or it does cast stockbroker or both is not wrong. sent15: if there exists something such that it does not cast stockbroker then the stop is a kind of a combretum. sent16: if the vinifera is not a Phanerozoic the pteridophyte casts stockbroker or is not caffeinic or both. sent17: that the perfluorocarbon does grandstand and/or it is not unperceptive hold. sent18: the starfish is not a kind of a topsail if it does cast stockbroker. sent19: that the vinifera casts stockbroker and does cast archdiocese is incorrect if something populates unhealthiness. sent20: the vinifera is not a kind of a Phanerozoic if that the sturgeon is a Southeast is not false. sent21: something is not a combretum if it is not exhaustible. sent22: something is not non-parasympathetic and/or does loot selva if it is not caffeinic. sent23: the archdiocese populates unhealthiness if it does not disjoint and it is appropriative. sent24: if there is something such that either it does grandstand or it is not unperceptive or both then the sturgeon is not malodorous. sent25: the fact that the starfish does not cast stockbroker is not incorrect if that the vinifera cast stockbroker and it does cast archdiocese is wrong. sent26: a exhaustible thing that does not loot isopod is not a topsail.
sent21 -> int1: the cine-film is not a kind of a combretum if it is not exhaustible.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cine-film is not exhaustible.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cine-film is not a combretum.; sent14 & sent12 -> int3: the starfish is not a topsail.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the cine-film is a combretum.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cine-film is exhaustible.; sent7 -> int7: the cine-film loots isopod if it is a Phanerozoic.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the cine-film does loot isopod.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the cine-film is exhaustible and it does loot isopod.; sent11 -> int10: if the cine-film is exhaustible thing that does loot isopod then it does not loot selva.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the cine-film does not loot selva.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the stop is not a topsail.
sent26 -> int12: if the stop is exhaustible but it does not loot isopod then it is not a topsail.; sent22 -> int13: if the pteridophyte is not caffeinic either it is a parasympathetic or it does loot selva or both.; sent1 -> int14: if either the pteridophyte is not a kind of a Phanerozoic or it is not a Southeast or both then it is non-caffeinic.; sent17 -> int15: something is a kind of a grandstand and/or it is not unperceptive.; int15 & sent24 -> int16: the sturgeon is not malodorous.; sent9 & int16 -> int17: the pteridophyte is not a Phanerozoic or it is not a Southeast or both.; int14 & int17 -> int18: the pteridophyte is not caffeinic.; int13 & int18 -> int19: the pteridophyte is parasympathetic and/or it loots selva.; sent2 -> int20: the fact that that the pteridophyte is exhaustible is not false if the pteridophyte is a parasympathetic is right.; sent23 & sent8 -> int21: the archdiocese does populate unhealthiness.; int21 -> int22: there exists something such that it populates unhealthiness.; int22 & sent19 -> int23: that the vinifera does cast stockbroker and casts archdiocese is incorrect.; sent25 & int23 -> int24: the starfish does not cast stockbroker.; int24 -> int25: there is something such that it does not cast stockbroker.; int25 & sent15 -> int26: the stop is a combretum.;
$hypothesis$ = the pteridophyte is a parasympathetic and it does loot selva. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a kind of a Phanerozoic and/or is not a kind of a Southeast is not caffeinic. sent2: if something is a parasympathetic it is exhaustible. sent3: the fact that the cine-film is a Phanerozoic hold. sent4: the cine-film is a combretum if that the starfish is not a topsail is correct. sent5: that the stop is exhaustible if the pteridophyte is exhaustible is not false. sent6: if something that is a combretum does not loot isopod then that it is parasympathetic is not false. sent7: if something is a Phanerozoic then it does loot isopod. sent8: the archdiocese does not disjoint and is not non-appropriative. sent9: the pteridophyte is not a Phanerozoic or not a Southeast or both if the sturgeon is not malodorous. sent10: if the cine-film does not loot selva the fact that the pteridophyte is a parasympathetic that does loot selva is wrong. sent11: if something is not inexhaustible and it does loot isopod it does not loot selva. sent12: the starfish is not caffeinic or casts stockbroker or both. sent13: that the pteridophyte is a combretum that does not loot isopod is correct if that it is not a kind of a topsail is correct. sent14: the starfish is not a topsail if the fact that either it is not caffeinic or it does cast stockbroker or both is not wrong. sent15: if there exists something such that it does not cast stockbroker then the stop is a kind of a combretum. sent16: if the vinifera is not a Phanerozoic the pteridophyte casts stockbroker or is not caffeinic or both. sent17: that the perfluorocarbon does grandstand and/or it is not unperceptive hold. sent18: the starfish is not a kind of a topsail if it does cast stockbroker. sent19: that the vinifera casts stockbroker and does cast archdiocese is incorrect if something populates unhealthiness. sent20: the vinifera is not a kind of a Phanerozoic if that the sturgeon is a Southeast is not false. sent21: something is not a combretum if it is not exhaustible. sent22: something is not non-parasympathetic and/or does loot selva if it is not caffeinic. sent23: the archdiocese populates unhealthiness if it does not disjoint and it is appropriative. sent24: if there is something such that either it does grandstand or it is not unperceptive or both then the sturgeon is not malodorous. sent25: the fact that the starfish does not cast stockbroker is not incorrect if that the vinifera cast stockbroker and it does cast archdiocese is wrong. sent26: a exhaustible thing that does not loot isopod is not a topsail. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: the cine-film is not a kind of a combretum if it is not exhaustible.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cine-film is not exhaustible.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cine-film is not a combretum.; sent14 & sent12 -> int3: the starfish is not a topsail.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the cine-film is a combretum.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cine-film is exhaustible.; sent7 -> int7: the cine-film loots isopod if it is a Phanerozoic.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the cine-film does loot isopod.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the cine-film is exhaustible and it does loot isopod.; sent11 -> int10: if the cine-film is exhaustible thing that does loot isopod then it does not loot selva.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the cine-film does not loot selva.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__