the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not neutering and it is a trade is not correct it is not Laputan does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a neutering and it is a trade is not true it is Laputan. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a trade then the fact that it is not Laputan is not wrong. sent3: if the fact that the yawn is not a neutering but it does trade is not correct then it is not Laputan. sent4: the yawn is not Laputan if it is not a neutering and is a kind of a trade. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is a neutering and it trades is wrong then it is not Laputan. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-neutering a trade then it is not Laputan. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-alpine thing that emends spectrograph is not correct it is not cryptobiotic.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not neutering and it is a trade is not correct it is not Laputan does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a neutering and it is a trade is not true it is Laputan. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a trade then the fact that it is not Laputan is not wrong. sent3: if the fact that the yawn is not a neutering but it does trade is not correct then it is not Laputan. sent4: the yawn is not Laputan if it is not a neutering and is a kind of a trade. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is a neutering and it trades is wrong then it is not Laputan. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-neutering a trade then it is not Laputan. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-alpine thing that emends spectrograph is not correct it is not cryptobiotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__