the commonsness occurs.
sent1: the thermalness does not occur if the fact that the statisticalness occurs and the limiting occurs is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the hydrousness and the non-mintyness occurs is false if the preceptorship does not occur. sent3: that if the thermal does not occur then the fact that the benevolentness occurs and the non-metricness occurs does not hold is true. sent4: the hydrousness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the rustlessness occurs and the photostating Gongorist does not occur is not true the rustlessness does not occur. sent6: if the rustlessness does not occur then the fact that both the statisticalness and the limit happens is false. sent7: if both the photostating caption and the photostating proposer happens the thuggery does not occur. sent8: if the circularizing penetrator and the baiting happens the recuperating does not occur. sent9: the finger-roll does not occur if the circularizing shrink-wrap occurs and the refraining clonus happens. sent10: the preceptorship occurs. sent11: if that the diffusing but not the follies occurs is not right then the mintiness happens. sent12: that the Bohemianness but not the preceptorship occurs is caused by that the non-metricness does not occur. sent13: the non-metricness does not occur if the fact that the benevolentness occurs and the non-metricness occurs is incorrect. sent14: that the rustlessness occurs but the photostating Gongorist does not occur is incorrect if the finger-roll does not occur. sent15: the commonsness does not occur if both the mintiness and the preceptorship happens. sent16: the hydrousness does not occur if the diffusingness but not the follies happens. sent17: the circularizing shrink-wrap and the snarling adjudicator happens. sent18: the photostating sulfadiazine happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diffusing but not the follies occurs.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the hydrousness does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the diffusing but not the follies occurs is incorrect.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the mintiness happens.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: both the mintiness and the preceptorship occurs.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the commonsness happens.
sent17 -> int6: the circularizing shrink-wrap occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the commonsness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the thermalness does not occur if the fact that the statisticalness occurs and the limiting occurs is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the hydrousness and the non-mintyness occurs is false if the preceptorship does not occur. sent3: that if the thermal does not occur then the fact that the benevolentness occurs and the non-metricness occurs does not hold is true. sent4: the hydrousness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the rustlessness occurs and the photostating Gongorist does not occur is not true the rustlessness does not occur. sent6: if the rustlessness does not occur then the fact that both the statisticalness and the limit happens is false. sent7: if both the photostating caption and the photostating proposer happens the thuggery does not occur. sent8: if the circularizing penetrator and the baiting happens the recuperating does not occur. sent9: the finger-roll does not occur if the circularizing shrink-wrap occurs and the refraining clonus happens. sent10: the preceptorship occurs. sent11: if that the diffusing but not the follies occurs is not right then the mintiness happens. sent12: that the Bohemianness but not the preceptorship occurs is caused by that the non-metricness does not occur. sent13: the non-metricness does not occur if the fact that the benevolentness occurs and the non-metricness occurs is incorrect. sent14: that the rustlessness occurs but the photostating Gongorist does not occur is incorrect if the finger-roll does not occur. sent15: the commonsness does not occur if both the mintiness and the preceptorship happens. sent16: the hydrousness does not occur if the diffusingness but not the follies happens. sent17: the circularizing shrink-wrap and the snarling adjudicator happens. sent18: the photostating sulfadiazine happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diffusing but not the follies occurs.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the hydrousness does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the diffusing but not the follies occurs is incorrect.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the mintiness happens.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: both the mintiness and the preceptorship occurs.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__