the commiserating Baraka does not occur.
sent1: the gardening occurs. sent2: the constantness occurs. sent3: if the instructing Grant happens and the peripateticness happens the commiserating Baraka does not occur. sent4: the rambling jointure occurs. sent5: if the falling happens the instructing Grant happens. sent6: the viticulture does not occur. sent7: not the scatology but the constant happens. sent8: if the atheroscleroticness does not occur the rambling jointure occurs but the falling does not occur. sent9: the fell occurs and the rambling jointure occurs. sent10: the formalization happens. sent11: the peripateticness occurs if the defacement happens.
sent9 -> int1: the falling occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the instructing Grant occurs.;
the commiserating Baraka happens.
$hypothesis$ = the commiserating Baraka does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the gardening occurs. sent2: the constantness occurs. sent3: if the instructing Grant happens and the peripateticness happens the commiserating Baraka does not occur. sent4: the rambling jointure occurs. sent5: if the falling happens the instructing Grant happens. sent6: the viticulture does not occur. sent7: not the scatology but the constant happens. sent8: if the atheroscleroticness does not occur the rambling jointure occurs but the falling does not occur. sent9: the fell occurs and the rambling jointure occurs. sent10: the formalization happens. sent11: the peripateticness occurs if the defacement happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the falling occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the instructing Grant occurs.; __UNKNOWN__