the tridymite is otic and details check-in.
sent1: that the packet is not warm hold. sent2: the sulcus does clangor tridymite if the fact that it clangors corker is correct. sent3: that the tripper does clangor corker and it is a corncob is not correct if there is something such that it does not crusade. sent4: if something does detail idiopathy then that it is a peripheral but not a cornstalk is correct. sent5: the tridymite is impressionistic if it is not a Dasyurus. sent6: that the tridymite is not a kind of a corncob if the steel is not a corncob and does not clangor corker is not false. sent7: the tocainide is most-favored-nation if that the fact that the packet does not detail Junkers but it is most-favored-nation is not right is not incorrect. sent8: everything does detail idiopathy. sent9: something is both a caddie and a parent if it is not a cornstalk. sent10: if that something does not detail check-in and it is not a corncob does not hold it does detail check-in. sent11: the finback does not crusade if the tocainide is a caddie and is most-favored-nation. sent12: the Junkers is otic. sent13: if the packet is not warm then it is alvine and it is a kind of a Dasyurus. sent14: the steel does not detail check-in if the fact that the catamountain is not aeronautical or is impressionistic or both is not right. sent15: the tridymite is not aeronautical. sent16: the tridymite is not crustal. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is crustal and/or does detail check-in does not hold the cabinetmaker is non-impressionistic. sent18: if the tridymite is not crustal then the fact that it does not detail check-in and is not a corncob does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the tridymite is aeronautical is not right it is not non-impressionistic. sent20: that something does not detail Junkers and is most-favored-nation is false if it lounges. sent21: something that is alvine is a lounge. sent22: the fact that the tridymite is not a vibration is not incorrect. sent23: if there exists something such that that it does clangor corker and it is a corncob is false then the kameez is crustal. sent24: something is otic if it is impressionistic. sent25: if the tridymite is non-crustal then it does impregnate. sent26: if there is something such that it is crustal the fact that the catamountain is not aeronautical and/or it is impressionistic is false.
sent19 & sent15 -> int1: the tridymite is impressionistic.; sent24 -> int2: if the tridymite is impressionistic it is otic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tridymite is otic.; sent10 -> int4: the tridymite details check-in if the fact that it does not details check-in and is not a kind of a corncob is not correct.; sent18 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the tridymite does not detail check-in and is not a corncob is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the tridymite does detail check-in hold.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the tridymite is not non-otic and it details check-in is not incorrect is false.
sent1 & sent13 -> int7: the packet is both alvine and a Dasyurus.; int7 -> int8: the packet is alvine.; sent21 -> int9: if the packet is alvine then it is a kind of a lounge.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the packet is a lounge is right.; sent20 -> int11: if the packet is a lounge then that it does not detail Junkers and is most-favored-nation is incorrect.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the packet does not detail Junkers but it is most-favored-nation is false.; sent7 & int12 -> int13: the tocainide is most-favored-nation.; sent9 -> int14: if the tocainide is not a cornstalk then it is a kind of a caddie and it is a parent.; sent4 -> int15: the irons is a peripheral but it is not a kind of a cornstalk if it details idiopathy.; sent8 -> int16: the irons does detail idiopathy.; int15 & int16 -> int17: the irons is a kind of a peripheral that is not a cornstalk.; int17 -> int18: everything is a kind of a peripheral and it is not a cornstalk.; int18 -> int19: the tocainide is peripheral and not a cornstalk.; int19 -> int20: the tocainide is not a kind of a cornstalk.; int14 & int20 -> int21: the tocainide is a caddie and it is a parent.; int21 -> int22: the tocainide is a caddie.; int13 & int22 -> int23: the tocainide is a caddie that is most-favored-nation.; sent11 & int23 -> int24: the finback does not crusade.; int24 -> int25: something does not crusade.; sent3 & int25 -> int26: that the tripper does clangor corker and is a corncob is incorrect.; int26 -> int27: there exists something such that the fact that it clangors corker and it is a corncob is wrong.; int27 & sent23 -> int28: the kameez is crustal.; int28 -> int29: the fact that something is crustal hold.; sent26 & int29 -> int30: the fact that either the catamountain is not aeronautical or it is impressionistic or both does not hold.; int30 & sent14 -> int31: the steel does not detail check-in.; int31 -> int32: there is something such that it does not detail check-in.;
$hypothesis$ = the tridymite is otic and details check-in. ; $context$ = sent1: that the packet is not warm hold. sent2: the sulcus does clangor tridymite if the fact that it clangors corker is correct. sent3: that the tripper does clangor corker and it is a corncob is not correct if there is something such that it does not crusade. sent4: if something does detail idiopathy then that it is a peripheral but not a cornstalk is correct. sent5: the tridymite is impressionistic if it is not a Dasyurus. sent6: that the tridymite is not a kind of a corncob if the steel is not a corncob and does not clangor corker is not false. sent7: the tocainide is most-favored-nation if that the fact that the packet does not detail Junkers but it is most-favored-nation is not right is not incorrect. sent8: everything does detail idiopathy. sent9: something is both a caddie and a parent if it is not a cornstalk. sent10: if that something does not detail check-in and it is not a corncob does not hold it does detail check-in. sent11: the finback does not crusade if the tocainide is a caddie and is most-favored-nation. sent12: the Junkers is otic. sent13: if the packet is not warm then it is alvine and it is a kind of a Dasyurus. sent14: the steel does not detail check-in if the fact that the catamountain is not aeronautical or is impressionistic or both is not right. sent15: the tridymite is not aeronautical. sent16: the tridymite is not crustal. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is crustal and/or does detail check-in does not hold the cabinetmaker is non-impressionistic. sent18: if the tridymite is not crustal then the fact that it does not detail check-in and is not a corncob does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the tridymite is aeronautical is not right it is not non-impressionistic. sent20: that something does not detail Junkers and is most-favored-nation is false if it lounges. sent21: something that is alvine is a lounge. sent22: the fact that the tridymite is not a vibration is not incorrect. sent23: if there exists something such that that it does clangor corker and it is a corncob is false then the kameez is crustal. sent24: something is otic if it is impressionistic. sent25: if the tridymite is non-crustal then it does impregnate. sent26: if there is something such that it is crustal the fact that the catamountain is not aeronautical and/or it is impressionistic is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent15 -> int1: the tridymite is impressionistic.; sent24 -> int2: if the tridymite is impressionistic it is otic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tridymite is otic.; sent10 -> int4: the tridymite details check-in if the fact that it does not details check-in and is not a kind of a corncob is not correct.; sent18 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the tridymite does not detail check-in and is not a corncob is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the tridymite does detail check-in hold.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__