there exists something such that it is both immunochemical and a vasopressin.
sent1: if the fact that the muscat is not paradigmatic but it is immunochemical is wrong then the hindquarter is paradigmatic. sent2: the hindquarter is paradigmatic and psychotherapeutic. sent3: something is not psychotherapeutic and it is not benthic if it does not deflower flannelette. sent4: if the muscat is psychotherapeutic the fact that it is not paradigmatic and not immunochemical is incorrect. sent5: there is nothing that is non-paradigmatic thing that is immunochemical. sent6: the amberbell deflowers flannelette if the hindquarter is psychotherapeutic. sent7: that the muscat is not a smoothhound but it is a glide is not right. sent8: that something is not a smoothhound and is not a glide does not hold if it is a kind of a flatbed. sent9: the hindquarter is flatbed. sent10: if something is paradigmatic then it is a pythoness. sent11: the muscat spins if the amberbell deflowers flannelette. sent12: if the muscat does spin then the fact that it is immunochemical hold. sent13: something is a vasopressin if that it is not a smoothhound and it does not glide is not right. sent14: the hindquarter is benthic if the amberbell is both not psychotherapeutic and benthic. sent15: the muscat is a flatbed and it is an assayer.
sent2 -> int1: the hindquarter is psychotherapeutic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the amberbell deflowers flannelette.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the muscat spins.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the muscat is immunochemical.; sent13 -> int5: if that the muscat is not a smoothhound and not a glide does not hold it is a vasopressin.; sent8 -> int6: the fact that the muscat is not a kind of a smoothhound and it is not a kind of a glide is wrong if it is a flatbed.; sent15 -> int7: the muscat is flatbed.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the muscat is not a smoothhound and it does not glide does not hold.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the muscat is a kind of a vasopressin.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the muscat is immunochemical and it is a vasopressin.; int10 -> hypothesis;
something is both a pythoness and benthic.
sent10 -> int11: the hindquarter is a pythoness if it is paradigmatic.; sent5 -> int12: the fact that the muscat is non-paradigmatic but it is immunochemical is not correct.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: the hindquarter is paradigmatic.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the hindquarter is a kind of a pythoness.; sent3 -> int15: the amberbell is not psychotherapeutic and it is not benthic if it does not deflower flannelette.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is both immunochemical and a vasopressin. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the muscat is not paradigmatic but it is immunochemical is wrong then the hindquarter is paradigmatic. sent2: the hindquarter is paradigmatic and psychotherapeutic. sent3: something is not psychotherapeutic and it is not benthic if it does not deflower flannelette. sent4: if the muscat is psychotherapeutic the fact that it is not paradigmatic and not immunochemical is incorrect. sent5: there is nothing that is non-paradigmatic thing that is immunochemical. sent6: the amberbell deflowers flannelette if the hindquarter is psychotherapeutic. sent7: that the muscat is not a smoothhound but it is a glide is not right. sent8: that something is not a smoothhound and is not a glide does not hold if it is a kind of a flatbed. sent9: the hindquarter is flatbed. sent10: if something is paradigmatic then it is a pythoness. sent11: the muscat spins if the amberbell deflowers flannelette. sent12: if the muscat does spin then the fact that it is immunochemical hold. sent13: something is a vasopressin if that it is not a smoothhound and it does not glide is not right. sent14: the hindquarter is benthic if the amberbell is both not psychotherapeutic and benthic. sent15: the muscat is a flatbed and it is an assayer. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the hindquarter is psychotherapeutic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the amberbell deflowers flannelette.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the muscat spins.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the muscat is immunochemical.; sent13 -> int5: if that the muscat is not a smoothhound and not a glide does not hold it is a vasopressin.; sent8 -> int6: the fact that the muscat is not a kind of a smoothhound and it is not a kind of a glide is wrong if it is a flatbed.; sent15 -> int7: the muscat is flatbed.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the muscat is not a smoothhound and it does not glide does not hold.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the muscat is a kind of a vasopressin.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the muscat is immunochemical and it is a vasopressin.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__