the llano is a mystification.
sent1: the trandolapril does corrupt if the jargon is mutagenic. sent2: the llano is a kind of a mystification if that the collection corrupts hold. sent3: the jargon is mutagenic. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-cerous thing that does not tease ambassadress is false the trandolapril is a mystification. sent5: the llano is a kind of a mystification if the collection is not unthematic. sent6: if that the jargon is not mutagenic and/or is unthematic is not right then the llano corrupts. sent7: if the trandolapril is corrupted the collection either is corrupted or is not unthematic or both.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the trandolapril is corrupted.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the collection is not non-corrupted or it is not unthematic or both.; int2 & sent2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the llano is not non-corrupted.
$hypothesis$ = the llano is a mystification. ; $context$ = sent1: the trandolapril does corrupt if the jargon is mutagenic. sent2: the llano is a kind of a mystification if that the collection corrupts hold. sent3: the jargon is mutagenic. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-cerous thing that does not tease ambassadress is false the trandolapril is a mystification. sent5: the llano is a kind of a mystification if the collection is not unthematic. sent6: if that the jargon is not mutagenic and/or is unthematic is not right then the llano corrupts. sent7: if the trandolapril is corrupted the collection either is corrupted or is not unthematic or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the trandolapril is corrupted.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the collection is not non-corrupted or it is not unthematic or both.; int2 & sent2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__