there exists something such that if it is glabellar it is a sonnet and does not cloud gamesmanship.
sent1: the aviatrix is a kind of a sonnet and it clouds gamesmanship if it is glabellar. sent2: the aviatrix is a kind of a sonnet if it is glabellar. sent3: there is something such that if it is glabellar then that it does not cloud gamesmanship is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Pereskia then it is an interference and it is not a kind of a helplessness. sent5: something is biotitic and is not a doorstop if it is inharmonious. sent6: there is something such that if it is diurnal then it does hook whispered and it is not chemiluminescent. sent7: that there exists something such that if that it is glabellar is not false it is a kind of a sonnet that clouds gamesmanship is not false. sent8: the aviatrix does sonnet if it is stative. sent9: something is unsupportive but it is not a box if it is a kind of a jester. sent10: the aviatrix does sonnet but it does not cloud gamesmanship if the fact that it is glabellar is correct. sent11: there exists something such that if it is glabellar then it does sonnet.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the walnut is biotitic but it is not a kind of a doorstop if it is inharmonious.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is glabellar it is a sonnet and does not cloud gamesmanship. ; $context$ = sent1: the aviatrix is a kind of a sonnet and it clouds gamesmanship if it is glabellar. sent2: the aviatrix is a kind of a sonnet if it is glabellar. sent3: there is something such that if it is glabellar then that it does not cloud gamesmanship is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Pereskia then it is an interference and it is not a kind of a helplessness. sent5: something is biotitic and is not a doorstop if it is inharmonious. sent6: there is something such that if it is diurnal then it does hook whispered and it is not chemiluminescent. sent7: that there exists something such that if that it is glabellar is not false it is a kind of a sonnet that clouds gamesmanship is not false. sent8: the aviatrix does sonnet if it is stative. sent9: something is unsupportive but it is not a box if it is a kind of a jester. sent10: the aviatrix does sonnet but it does not cloud gamesmanship if the fact that it is glabellar is correct. sent11: there exists something such that if it is glabellar then it does sonnet. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__