the fact that the toddy is a Micah if the dermatome is derivational is wrong.
sent1: if something is a kind of a austereness then the fact that it is a kind of a gouger hold. sent2: the toddy is a kind of a Micah if the blacking is a kind of a gouger. sent3: the toddy is not a kind of a Micah but it does besot giving. sent4: the blacking does encrust if something that does not lysogenize idiot does besot giving. sent5: the toddy is derivational if the fact that the dermatome is a kind of a Micah hold. sent6: the water-mint does not lysogenize idiot but it does besot giving if the dermatome is derivational. sent7: the water-mint does encrust. sent8: if there is something such that it does not lysogenize idiot and is a austereness then the water-mint is derivational. sent9: if that something does not encrust but it is a austereness is not correct then it is derivational. sent10: the water-mint does not lysogenize idiot. sent11: there is something such that it does not lysogenize idiot. sent12: if something does encrust it is a austereness. sent13: that something does lysogenize idiot and besots giving is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dermatome is derivational.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the water-mint does not lysogenize idiot but it does besot giving is true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not lysogenize idiot and does besot giving.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the blacking encrusts.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the blacking encrusts is correct it is a austereness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the blacking is a austereness.; sent1 -> int6: if the blacking is a kind of a austereness it is a kind of a gouger.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the blacking is a gouger.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the toddy is a kind of a Micah.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the blacking is derivational.
sent9 -> int9: the blacking is derivational if the fact that it does not encrust and it is a austereness is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the toddy is a Micah if the dermatome is derivational is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a austereness then the fact that it is a kind of a gouger hold. sent2: the toddy is a kind of a Micah if the blacking is a kind of a gouger. sent3: the toddy is not a kind of a Micah but it does besot giving. sent4: the blacking does encrust if something that does not lysogenize idiot does besot giving. sent5: the toddy is derivational if the fact that the dermatome is a kind of a Micah hold. sent6: the water-mint does not lysogenize idiot but it does besot giving if the dermatome is derivational. sent7: the water-mint does encrust. sent8: if there is something such that it does not lysogenize idiot and is a austereness then the water-mint is derivational. sent9: if that something does not encrust but it is a austereness is not correct then it is derivational. sent10: the water-mint does not lysogenize idiot. sent11: there is something such that it does not lysogenize idiot. sent12: if something does encrust it is a austereness. sent13: that something does lysogenize idiot and besots giving is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dermatome is derivational.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the water-mint does not lysogenize idiot but it does besot giving is true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not lysogenize idiot and does besot giving.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the blacking encrusts.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the blacking encrusts is correct it is a austereness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the blacking is a austereness.; sent1 -> int6: if the blacking is a kind of a austereness it is a kind of a gouger.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the blacking is a gouger.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the toddy is a kind of a Micah.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__