that something is a beautification and it is meretricious is not right.
sent1: the fact that that something is not meretricious but it does sleep is right is false if it does not contemn threadfish. sent2: the gastroenterologist is meretricious. sent3: the gastroenterologist is a beautification. sent4: the gastroenterologist does not contemn threadfish if the fact that the henbane contemn threadfish and is obligational is false. sent5: there exists something such that it is meretricious. sent6: there is something such that it is a beautification. sent7: there exists something such that it does not drown and is laryngeal.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the gastroenterologist is a beautification and it is meretricious.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the septum is a beautification.
sent1 -> int2: that the gastroenterologist is non-meretricious thing that is a sleep is not correct if it does not contemn threadfish.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is a beautification and it is meretricious is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that something is not meretricious but it does sleep is right is false if it does not contemn threadfish. sent2: the gastroenterologist is meretricious. sent3: the gastroenterologist is a beautification. sent4: the gastroenterologist does not contemn threadfish if the fact that the henbane contemn threadfish and is obligational is false. sent5: there exists something such that it is meretricious. sent6: there is something such that it is a beautification. sent7: there exists something such that it does not drown and is laryngeal. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the gastroenterologist is a beautification and it is meretricious.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__