the fact that the radioactiveness happens and the invertebrate occurs is not true.
sent1: the mutter occurs if the basidiomycetousness occurs. sent2: the proving occurs if the fact that the incorporating weekender occurs is not wrong. sent3: that the producer occurs and the developmentalness occurs does not hold if the sporadicness does not occur. sent4: that the incorporating weekender happens and the cannibalism occurs is triggered by the non-paleocorticalness. sent5: if the Austronesianness does not occur then the electronicsness and the cardinalship occurs. sent6: the producer occurs if the vegetation happens. sent7: the basidiomycetousness happens. sent8: the paleocorticalness does not occur if that the varnish does not occur and the paleocorticalness happens is false. sent9: that the share occurs is brought about by the briefing cumulus. sent10: that the electronicsness and the developmentalness happens prevents that the carrier occurs. sent11: if the mutter occurs then the polls and the non-incalculableness occurs. sent12: the vegetation occurs if both the polling and the non-incalculableness occurs. sent13: if the fact that the incalculableness does not occur is not false both the polling and the radioactiveness occurs. sent14: that the incorporating weekender does not occur prevents that the spat happens. sent15: the weightiness occurs. sent16: that the proving but not the spat occurs is triggered by that the incorporating weekender does not occur. sent17: if the briefing mount does not occur then the fact that the briefing crematory occurs and the bionicsness occurs does not hold. sent18: the developmentalness is caused by that the producer happens. sent19: the fact that not the carrier but the electronicsness occurs is not true if the fact that the cardinalship does not occur is not wrong. sent20: the fact that both the radioactiveness and the invertebrateness occurs is not true if the carrier does not occur. sent21: the incorporating weekender does not occur. sent22: if the polling does not occur the radioactiveness occurs and the mutter occurs. sent23: the Austronesianness is prevented by that the proving happens and the spitting does not occur. sent24: the casting occurs.
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: that the mutter occurs hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the polls but not the incalculableness occurs is true.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the vegetation occurs.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the producer happens.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the developmentalness occurs.; sent16 & sent21 -> int6: the proving happens but the spat does not occur.; sent23 & int6 -> int7: the Austronesianness does not occur.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the electronicsness happens and the cardinalship occurs.; int8 -> int9: the electronicsness occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the electronicsness happens and the developmentalness happens is correct.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the carrier does not occur.; int11 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
both the radioactiveness and the invertebrateness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the radioactiveness happens and the invertebrate occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the mutter occurs if the basidiomycetousness occurs. sent2: the proving occurs if the fact that the incorporating weekender occurs is not wrong. sent3: that the producer occurs and the developmentalness occurs does not hold if the sporadicness does not occur. sent4: that the incorporating weekender happens and the cannibalism occurs is triggered by the non-paleocorticalness. sent5: if the Austronesianness does not occur then the electronicsness and the cardinalship occurs. sent6: the producer occurs if the vegetation happens. sent7: the basidiomycetousness happens. sent8: the paleocorticalness does not occur if that the varnish does not occur and the paleocorticalness happens is false. sent9: that the share occurs is brought about by the briefing cumulus. sent10: that the electronicsness and the developmentalness happens prevents that the carrier occurs. sent11: if the mutter occurs then the polls and the non-incalculableness occurs. sent12: the vegetation occurs if both the polling and the non-incalculableness occurs. sent13: if the fact that the incalculableness does not occur is not false both the polling and the radioactiveness occurs. sent14: that the incorporating weekender does not occur prevents that the spat happens. sent15: the weightiness occurs. sent16: that the proving but not the spat occurs is triggered by that the incorporating weekender does not occur. sent17: if the briefing mount does not occur then the fact that the briefing crematory occurs and the bionicsness occurs does not hold. sent18: the developmentalness is caused by that the producer happens. sent19: the fact that not the carrier but the electronicsness occurs is not true if the fact that the cardinalship does not occur is not wrong. sent20: the fact that both the radioactiveness and the invertebrateness occurs is not true if the carrier does not occur. sent21: the incorporating weekender does not occur. sent22: if the polling does not occur the radioactiveness occurs and the mutter occurs. sent23: the Austronesianness is prevented by that the proving happens and the spitting does not occur. sent24: the casting occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: that the mutter occurs hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the polls but not the incalculableness occurs is true.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the vegetation occurs.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the producer happens.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the developmentalness occurs.; sent16 & sent21 -> int6: the proving happens but the spat does not occur.; sent23 & int6 -> int7: the Austronesianness does not occur.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the electronicsness happens and the cardinalship occurs.; int8 -> int9: the electronicsness occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the electronicsness happens and the developmentalness happens is correct.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the carrier does not occur.; int11 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__