the enflurane is capitular if the mucin stridulates.
sent1: if something is a supplier then the fact that it stridulates and it is not a single-mindedness does not hold. sent2: that the mucin is not a postdiluvian and it is not capitular is not right if there is something such that the fact that it does not stridulate is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the enflurane is capitular is not wrong if the fact that the mucin does not stridulate and is not a supplier is false. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a nuisance and/or it does not fill waiter does not hold the sycamore is a kind of a supplier. sent5: that either the waiter is not a kind of a nuisance or it does not fill waiter or both is not right if it does not allow. sent6: everything does dive and does not allow. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does stridulate and it is not a single-mindedness is incorrect the fact that the enflurane does not stridulate is not wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mucin does not stridulate and is not a supplier.; assump2 -> int1: the mucin does not stridulate.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mucin does stridulate.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the mucin does not stridulate and is not a supplier is not right.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the enflurane is capitular is not wrong.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the mucin is both not a postdiluvian and not capitular does not hold.
sent1 -> int5: if the sycamore is a kind of a supplier then that it does stridulate and is not a kind of a single-mindedness is not true.; sent6 -> int6: the waiter does dive and does not allow.; int6 -> int7: the waiter does not allow.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: that the waiter is not a nuisance and/or it does not fill waiter is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nuisance or does not fill waiter or both is not right.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the sycamore is a supplier.; int5 & int10 -> int11: that the sycamore does stridulate and is not a kind of a single-mindedness is not right.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it does stridulate and it is not a single-mindedness does not hold.; int12 & sent7 -> int13: the enflurane does not stridulate.; int13 -> int14: something does not stridulate.; int14 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the enflurane is capitular if the mucin stridulates. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a supplier then the fact that it stridulates and it is not a single-mindedness does not hold. sent2: that the mucin is not a postdiluvian and it is not capitular is not right if there is something such that the fact that it does not stridulate is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the enflurane is capitular is not wrong if the fact that the mucin does not stridulate and is not a supplier is false. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a nuisance and/or it does not fill waiter does not hold the sycamore is a kind of a supplier. sent5: that either the waiter is not a kind of a nuisance or it does not fill waiter or both is not right if it does not allow. sent6: everything does dive and does not allow. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does stridulate and it is not a single-mindedness is incorrect the fact that the enflurane does not stridulate is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mucin does not stridulate and is not a supplier.; assump2 -> int1: the mucin does not stridulate.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mucin does stridulate.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the mucin does not stridulate and is not a supplier is not right.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the enflurane is capitular is not wrong.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__