the fact that the undeniableness yields the purchase does not hold.
sent1: if the unintelligibleness happens then the fact that the bob happens hold. sent2: if the undeniableness happens then the fusillading does not occur and the hair-raiser does not occur. sent3: if that the collegiateness does not occur is false the thickening does not occur and the operation does not occur. sent4: the extinguishing happens. sent5: that the fusillade does not occur and the hair-raiser does not occur triggers that the slenderizing happens. sent6: that the sponsorship happens is caused by that the oophorectomy happens. sent7: the overrunning occurs. sent8: the burglarizing oxyacetylene occurs. sent9: that the slenderizing happens leads to the purchase. sent10: that the slenderizing happens is triggered by that not the fusillade but the hair-raiser occurs. sent11: the undeniableness prevents the hair-raiser. sent12: the hair-raiser does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the undeniableness happens is right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fusillade does not occur and the hair-raiser does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the slenderizing occurs.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the purchase occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the undeniableness yields the purchase does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the unintelligibleness happens then the fact that the bob happens hold. sent2: if the undeniableness happens then the fusillading does not occur and the hair-raiser does not occur. sent3: if that the collegiateness does not occur is false the thickening does not occur and the operation does not occur. sent4: the extinguishing happens. sent5: that the fusillade does not occur and the hair-raiser does not occur triggers that the slenderizing happens. sent6: that the sponsorship happens is caused by that the oophorectomy happens. sent7: the overrunning occurs. sent8: the burglarizing oxyacetylene occurs. sent9: that the slenderizing happens leads to the purchase. sent10: that the slenderizing happens is triggered by that not the fusillade but the hair-raiser occurs. sent11: the undeniableness prevents the hair-raiser. sent12: the hair-raiser does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the undeniableness happens is right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fusillade does not occur and the hair-raiser does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the slenderizing occurs.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the purchase occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__