the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a skinny and is not a dudgeon is false it does catalyze ocher is not true.
sent1: if the apex is a kind of a skinny and is not a kind of a dudgeon it catalyzes ocher. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a Frisian and it is not changeless is wrong then it is a kind of a phosgene. sent3: there is something such that if that it is sternal thing that is not a kind of a doorknob does not hold then it is cyclopean. sent4: the apex does catalyze ocher if it is a dudgeon. sent5: if that the buff is a malversation and it is a dryness does not hold then it catalyzes ocher. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a skinny then it catalyzes ocher. sent7: if that something is a kind of a nonmetal and does not slice Santalum is incorrect that it is a dudgeon is right. sent8: the fact that the apex does catalyze ocher is not false if the fact that it is both a skinny and not a dudgeon is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a skinny that is a kind of a dudgeon is incorrect it does catalyze ocher. sent10: if that something does catalyze divulgence and is not extroversive is false the fact that it is a kind of a skinny is not false.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the apex is a dudgeon if that it is a kind of a nonmetal that does not slice Santalum is not true.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a skinny and is not a dudgeon is false it does catalyze ocher is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the apex is a kind of a skinny and is not a kind of a dudgeon it catalyzes ocher. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a Frisian and it is not changeless is wrong then it is a kind of a phosgene. sent3: there is something such that if that it is sternal thing that is not a kind of a doorknob does not hold then it is cyclopean. sent4: the apex does catalyze ocher if it is a dudgeon. sent5: if that the buff is a malversation and it is a dryness does not hold then it catalyzes ocher. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a skinny then it catalyzes ocher. sent7: if that something is a kind of a nonmetal and does not slice Santalum is incorrect that it is a dudgeon is right. sent8: the fact that the apex does catalyze ocher is not false if the fact that it is both a skinny and not a dudgeon is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a skinny that is a kind of a dudgeon is incorrect it does catalyze ocher. sent10: if that something does catalyze divulgence and is not extroversive is false the fact that it is a kind of a skinny is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__