the fact that the goldstone is not a Malian and not phonics does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the spectinomycin is nocturnal and it is a recall is false hold if the carbine does not clank visualization. sent2: the goldstone is not phonics if there is something such that it is either not phonics or not a Wroclaw or both. sent3: The mileage travesties carbine. sent4: the fact that the carbine does not travesty mileage is correct if it is not agrobiologic and it is not a colony. sent5: the carbine travesties mileage. sent6: if that the spectinomycin is nocturnal and it recalls is not right the goldstone is not Malian. sent7: the actinopod is not phonics or it is not a Wroclaw or both. sent8: if the fact that the carbine is non-agrobiologic thing that is not a colony is incorrect it does not clank visualization.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carbine is non-agrobiologic and it is not a kind of a colony.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the carbine does not travesty mileage.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the carbine is a kind of non-agrobiologic thing that is not a colony is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the carbine does not clank visualization.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that that the spectinomycin is nocturnal and it does recall is not incorrect is incorrect.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the goldstone is not a kind of a Malian.; sent7 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not phonics and/or is not a kind of a Wroclaw is right.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the goldstone is not phonics.; int6 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the goldstone is not a Malian and not phonics does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the spectinomycin is nocturnal and it is a recall is false hold if the carbine does not clank visualization. sent2: the goldstone is not phonics if there is something such that it is either not phonics or not a Wroclaw or both. sent3: The mileage travesties carbine. sent4: the fact that the carbine does not travesty mileage is correct if it is not agrobiologic and it is not a colony. sent5: the carbine travesties mileage. sent6: if that the spectinomycin is nocturnal and it recalls is not right the goldstone is not Malian. sent7: the actinopod is not phonics or it is not a Wroclaw or both. sent8: if the fact that the carbine is non-agrobiologic thing that is not a colony is incorrect it does not clank visualization. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carbine is non-agrobiologic and it is not a kind of a colony.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the carbine does not travesty mileage.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the carbine is a kind of non-agrobiologic thing that is not a colony is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the carbine does not clank visualization.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that that the spectinomycin is nocturnal and it does recall is not incorrect is incorrect.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the goldstone is not a kind of a Malian.; sent7 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not phonics and/or is not a kind of a Wroclaw is right.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the goldstone is not phonics.; int6 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__