the lamp enfranchises collagen.
sent1: something does not enfranchise collagen if the fact that it is a smoothed that is a kind of a connivance is not right. sent2: the lamp is not a kind of a potsherd. sent3: the fact that the lamp smooths and it is a connivance does not hold if it is not a potsherd. sent4: if something is not a kind of a ziggurat then it does enfranchise collagen and is a potsherd. sent5: that the lamp is cardinal and it is a steamer is wrong if it does not smooth.
sent1 -> int1: if that the lamp is smoothed and a connivance is false it does not enfranchise collagen.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: that the lamp does smooth and is a kind of a connivance is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the lamp does enfranchise collagen.
sent4 -> int3: the lamp does enfranchise collagen and it is a potsherd if it is not a ziggurat.;
$hypothesis$ = the lamp enfranchises collagen. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not enfranchise collagen if the fact that it is a smoothed that is a kind of a connivance is not right. sent2: the lamp is not a kind of a potsherd. sent3: the fact that the lamp smooths and it is a connivance does not hold if it is not a potsherd. sent4: if something is not a kind of a ziggurat then it does enfranchise collagen and is a potsherd. sent5: that the lamp is cardinal and it is a steamer is wrong if it does not smooth. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if that the lamp is smoothed and a connivance is false it does not enfranchise collagen.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: that the lamp does smooth and is a kind of a connivance is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__