the off-roader is not a tutorial.
sent1: if the tricot is a kind of a absorptivity the off-roader is not tutorial. sent2: something agrees and is macrocosmic if it is not a Aegean. sent3: if the fact that something is a Kaufman and it is minimal is not right it does not heap. sent4: the capillarity does not heap if there exists something such that the fact that it unwraps Scorsese and it is a chattel is false. sent5: that the umbel is a laminate and it does unwrap charades is not true if there exists something such that that it does not impersonate rennin hold. sent6: the off-roader does not heap if it is not minimal. sent7: the iodine is minimal if the survival does heap. sent8: the fact that the tricot is a absorptivity does not hold if there is something such that that it does unwrap Scorsese and it is a chattel is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does impersonate bohemia and impersonates centerpiece is incorrect. sent10: if the instrument is not heraldic then the airship is not a Aegean. sent11: if something does not heap then it is tutorial. sent12: the tricot is a absorptivity if the fact that the toiletry is not a kind of a absorptivity but it is a Kaufman is not correct. sent13: if the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it laminates and it unwraps charades is not right is right the instrument is not heraldic. sent14: if the iodine is not non-minimal then that the toiletry is not a absorptivity but it is a Kaufman does not hold. sent15: the charterhouse does not impersonate rennin. sent16: if the fact that the off-roader is minimal and does unwrap Scorsese is wrong that it does not heap is true. sent17: if something agrees it does unwrap airship. sent18: that that the shopfront does wet and does not spiel napkin is not correct is correct if there is something such that it unwraps airship. sent19: there is nothing such that it unwraps Scorsese and it is a chattel. sent20: something does not heap if it is not minimal. sent21: if the tricot is not a kind of a absorptivity that the off-roader is a Kaufman and it is minimal is false.
sent19 -> int1: the fact that the capillarity does unwrap Scorsese and is a chattel does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it unwraps Scorsese and is a chattel is wrong.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the tricot is not a kind of a absorptivity.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the off-roader is a Kaufman and it is minimal is not correct.; sent3 -> int5: the off-roader does not heap if that it is a kind of a Kaufman and is minimal is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the off-roader does not heap.; sent11 -> int7: if the off-roader does not heap then it is tutorial.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the off-roader is not a kind of a tutorial.
sent17 -> int8: if the airship does agree then it unwraps airship.; sent2 -> int9: the airship does agree and is macrocosmic if it is not a Aegean.; sent15 -> int10: there exists something such that it does not impersonate rennin.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: that the umbel does laminate and does unwrap charades is incorrect.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a laminate that unwraps charades is not correct.; int12 & sent13 -> int13: that the instrument is heraldic is false.; sent10 & int13 -> int14: the airship is not a Aegean.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the airship agrees and is macrocosmic.; int15 -> int16: the airship does agree.; int8 & int16 -> int17: the airship unwraps airship.; int17 -> int18: that there is something such that it does unwrap airship is correct.; int18 & sent18 -> int19: that the shopfront is wet but it does not spiel napkin is wrong.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that that it is wet thing that does not spiel napkin is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the off-roader is not a tutorial. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tricot is a kind of a absorptivity the off-roader is not tutorial. sent2: something agrees and is macrocosmic if it is not a Aegean. sent3: if the fact that something is a Kaufman and it is minimal is not right it does not heap. sent4: the capillarity does not heap if there exists something such that the fact that it unwraps Scorsese and it is a chattel is false. sent5: that the umbel is a laminate and it does unwrap charades is not true if there exists something such that that it does not impersonate rennin hold. sent6: the off-roader does not heap if it is not minimal. sent7: the iodine is minimal if the survival does heap. sent8: the fact that the tricot is a absorptivity does not hold if there is something such that that it does unwrap Scorsese and it is a chattel is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does impersonate bohemia and impersonates centerpiece is incorrect. sent10: if the instrument is not heraldic then the airship is not a Aegean. sent11: if something does not heap then it is tutorial. sent12: the tricot is a absorptivity if the fact that the toiletry is not a kind of a absorptivity but it is a Kaufman is not correct. sent13: if the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it laminates and it unwraps charades is not right is right the instrument is not heraldic. sent14: if the iodine is not non-minimal then that the toiletry is not a absorptivity but it is a Kaufman does not hold. sent15: the charterhouse does not impersonate rennin. sent16: if the fact that the off-roader is minimal and does unwrap Scorsese is wrong that it does not heap is true. sent17: if something agrees it does unwrap airship. sent18: that that the shopfront does wet and does not spiel napkin is not correct is correct if there is something such that it unwraps airship. sent19: there is nothing such that it unwraps Scorsese and it is a chattel. sent20: something does not heap if it is not minimal. sent21: if the tricot is not a kind of a absorptivity that the off-roader is a Kaufman and it is minimal is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the fact that the capillarity does unwrap Scorsese and is a chattel does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it unwraps Scorsese and is a chattel is wrong.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the tricot is not a kind of a absorptivity.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the off-roader is a Kaufman and it is minimal is not correct.; sent3 -> int5: the off-roader does not heap if that it is a kind of a Kaufman and is minimal is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the off-roader does not heap.; sent11 -> int7: if the off-roader does not heap then it is tutorial.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__