the comet is a fang.
sent1: that the headwater is not aldermanic and is Lusitanian is not true if it does shine. sent2: the comet is imprecise and/or it does shine. sent3: if the Maraco is imprecise thing that is not a apperception then the fact that the comet is not imprecise is correct. sent4: the fact that the Maraco is imprecise but it is not infallible is wrong. sent5: the comet is not a fang if the Maraco is a kind of a apperception. sent6: if something is infallible then it is a fang. sent7: there exists something such that it is a apperception. sent8: if something is not imprecise or does shine or both then the fact that it is infallible is right. sent9: if something is aldermanic then it does shine. sent10: a Lusitanian thing is aldermanic. sent11: if the fact that the Maraco is imprecise and is not infallible is not right it does not shine. sent12: the comet is a Aristotelian and it is Lusitanian if there exists something such that it is a apperception.
sent7 & sent12 -> int1: the comet is a kind of Aristotelian thing that is Lusitanian.; int1 -> int2: the comet is Lusitanian.; sent10 -> int3: the comet is aldermanic if it is Lusitanian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the comet is aldermanic.; sent9 -> int5: the comet shines if it is aldermanic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the comet does shine.; int6 -> int7: the comet either is not imprecise or shines or both.; sent8 -> int8: if the comet is not imprecise and/or it shines it is infallible.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the comet is infallible.; sent6 -> int10: if the comet is infallible it is a kind of a fang.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the comet is not a fang.
sent11 & sent4 -> int11: the Maraco does not shine.;
$hypothesis$ = the comet is a fang. ; $context$ = sent1: that the headwater is not aldermanic and is Lusitanian is not true if it does shine. sent2: the comet is imprecise and/or it does shine. sent3: if the Maraco is imprecise thing that is not a apperception then the fact that the comet is not imprecise is correct. sent4: the fact that the Maraco is imprecise but it is not infallible is wrong. sent5: the comet is not a fang if the Maraco is a kind of a apperception. sent6: if something is infallible then it is a fang. sent7: there exists something such that it is a apperception. sent8: if something is not imprecise or does shine or both then the fact that it is infallible is right. sent9: if something is aldermanic then it does shine. sent10: a Lusitanian thing is aldermanic. sent11: if the fact that the Maraco is imprecise and is not infallible is not right it does not shine. sent12: the comet is a Aristotelian and it is Lusitanian if there exists something such that it is a apperception. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent12 -> int1: the comet is a kind of Aristotelian thing that is Lusitanian.; int1 -> int2: the comet is Lusitanian.; sent10 -> int3: the comet is aldermanic if it is Lusitanian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the comet is aldermanic.; sent9 -> int5: the comet shines if it is aldermanic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the comet does shine.; int6 -> int7: the comet either is not imprecise or shines or both.; sent8 -> int8: if the comet is not imprecise and/or it shines it is infallible.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the comet is infallible.; sent6 -> int10: if the comet is infallible it is a kind of a fang.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__