there is something such that if it is a kind of insectan a figure then it does not copy geranium.
sent1: the flourish does not copy geranium if it is not non-insectan and it figures. sent2: there exists something such that if it is enzymatic a plural then it is drupaceous. sent3: something that is a Megaera and is an impossible is not a flamefish. sent4: if the flourish is a kind of a Sphyrna and it is insectan it is not colorimetric. sent5: if the flourish is insectan and it is a kind of a figure it copies geranium. sent6: something is not explicit if it is a teaberry and copies geranium. sent7: something is not a Arabian if it is both a mountaineer and insectan. sent8: there is something such that if that it dominates Cotonou and it does glamorize flourish is correct it is not procedural. sent9: there is something such that if it is insectan and a figure then that it copies geranium is not false. sent10: the fact that the storminess is not a ski-plane is not wrong if it does hate hauberk and it is a constant. sent11: the flourish is a bridal if it copies geranium and it is not personal. sent12: if the hauberk copies crupper and is lithic it is not a kind of a figure.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that there is something such that if it is a Megaera and it is an impossible it is not a flamefish is not false.
sent3 -> int1: if the msasa is a Megaera and it is an impossible it is not a flamefish.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of insectan a figure then it does not copy geranium. ; $context$ = sent1: the flourish does not copy geranium if it is not non-insectan and it figures. sent2: there exists something such that if it is enzymatic a plural then it is drupaceous. sent3: something that is a Megaera and is an impossible is not a flamefish. sent4: if the flourish is a kind of a Sphyrna and it is insectan it is not colorimetric. sent5: if the flourish is insectan and it is a kind of a figure it copies geranium. sent6: something is not explicit if it is a teaberry and copies geranium. sent7: something is not a Arabian if it is both a mountaineer and insectan. sent8: there is something such that if that it dominates Cotonou and it does glamorize flourish is correct it is not procedural. sent9: there is something such that if it is insectan and a figure then that it copies geranium is not false. sent10: the fact that the storminess is not a ski-plane is not wrong if it does hate hauberk and it is a constant. sent11: the flourish is a bridal if it copies geranium and it is not personal. sent12: if the hauberk copies crupper and is lithic it is not a kind of a figure. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__