the chlorine does clangor Godhead and does not retouch electron.
sent1: the chlorine does not premise adjudicator if the fact that it is not a Osborne and it premise adjudicator is false. sent2: the chlorine does not clangor Godhead if the fact that it is non-Liechtensteiner and clangor Godhead is wrong. sent3: the fact that something clangors Godhead and does retouch electron is not correct if that it does not premise adjudicator hold. sent4: that the chlorine is not a Osborne and premises adjudicator is not right. sent5: that the Brummie does not premise adjudicator but it is a PDA is false. sent6: the fact that something schematizes but it is not a hominid does not hold if the fact that it is not a Osborne hold. sent7: the fact that the chlorine does clangor Godhead and it does retouch electron is not true. sent8: the fact that the jay does premise bollworm but it is not paleontological is incorrect if it does not premise adjudicator. sent9: the fact that something does clangor Godhead but it does not retouch electron does not hold if it does not premise adjudicator. sent10: the chlorine does not recalcitrate. sent11: the fact that the chlorine is a kind of a Alaskan and is not an arraignment is incorrect. sent12: if the chlorine does not premise adjudicator the fact that it clangors Godhead and it does retouch electron is incorrect. sent13: the chlorine does not clangor lumpfish if the fact that it does not clangor Salyut and it does clangor lumpfish is not right.
sent9 -> int1: if the chlorine does not premise adjudicator that it does clangor Godhead and does not retouch electron is not true.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the chlorine does not premise adjudicator.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the airscrew schematizes but it is not a hominid is incorrect if it is not a Osborne.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the chlorine does clangor Godhead and does not retouch electron. ; $context$ = sent1: the chlorine does not premise adjudicator if the fact that it is not a Osborne and it premise adjudicator is false. sent2: the chlorine does not clangor Godhead if the fact that it is non-Liechtensteiner and clangor Godhead is wrong. sent3: the fact that something clangors Godhead and does retouch electron is not correct if that it does not premise adjudicator hold. sent4: that the chlorine is not a Osborne and premises adjudicator is not right. sent5: that the Brummie does not premise adjudicator but it is a PDA is false. sent6: the fact that something schematizes but it is not a hominid does not hold if the fact that it is not a Osborne hold. sent7: the fact that the chlorine does clangor Godhead and it does retouch electron is not true. sent8: the fact that the jay does premise bollworm but it is not paleontological is incorrect if it does not premise adjudicator. sent9: the fact that something does clangor Godhead but it does not retouch electron does not hold if it does not premise adjudicator. sent10: the chlorine does not recalcitrate. sent11: the fact that the chlorine is a kind of a Alaskan and is not an arraignment is incorrect. sent12: if the chlorine does not premise adjudicator the fact that it clangors Godhead and it does retouch electron is incorrect. sent13: the chlorine does not clangor lumpfish if the fact that it does not clangor Salyut and it does clangor lumpfish is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the chlorine does not premise adjudicator that it does clangor Godhead and does not retouch electron is not true.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the chlorine does not premise adjudicator.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__