if the fact that the modeling does not occur is false then the fact that the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur and the intensifying fencing does not occur is not true.
sent1: the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur and the intensifying fencing does not occur if the modeling happens. sent2: if the fact that the intensifying fencing happens but the skit does not occur is correct then the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur. sent3: if the presidentialness does not occur then the fact that the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur and the intensifying fencing does not occur does not hold. sent4: the preying philosopher happens. sent5: the fact that the ratcheting Saskatoon but not the intensifying fencing happens is not right. sent6: that not the ratcheting Saskatoon but the intensifying fencing occurs does not hold if the modeling occurs. sent7: the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur if the fact that the intensifying fencing happens and the skit happens does not hold. sent8: the nonspecificness does not occur if the electrophoreticness happens and the modeling happens. sent9: the anestrousness does not occur if the fact that the modeling occurs and the electrophoreticness does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the modeling does not occur then the electrophoreticness but not the proofreading happens. sent11: the adaptation occurs. sent12: the skit does not occur if the preying philosopher occurs. sent13: the presidentialness does not occur if the nonspecificness does not occur and the ratcheting Epirus does not occur. sent14: if the preying philosopher occurs then the ratcheting Epirus does not occur and the skit does not occur. sent15: the non-archesporialness is caused by that the livableness occurs and the rambling occurs. sent16: the electrophoreticness occurs. sent17: if the fact that the atrocity does not occur is not false the fact that the guesstimating and the non-Namibianness occurs is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the modeling happens is not wrong.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the electrophoreticness happens and the modeling happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the nonspecificness does not occur.; sent14 & sent4 -> int3: the ratcheting Epirus does not occur and the skit does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the ratcheting Epirus does not occur is not wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the nonspecificness does not occur and the ratcheting Epirus does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the presidentialness does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur and the intensifying fencing does not occur is not correct.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the proofreading does not occur is right.
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the modeling does not occur is false then the fact that the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur and the intensifying fencing does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur and the intensifying fencing does not occur if the modeling happens. sent2: if the fact that the intensifying fencing happens but the skit does not occur is correct then the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur. sent3: if the presidentialness does not occur then the fact that the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur and the intensifying fencing does not occur does not hold. sent4: the preying philosopher happens. sent5: the fact that the ratcheting Saskatoon but not the intensifying fencing happens is not right. sent6: that not the ratcheting Saskatoon but the intensifying fencing occurs does not hold if the modeling occurs. sent7: the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur if the fact that the intensifying fencing happens and the skit happens does not hold. sent8: the nonspecificness does not occur if the electrophoreticness happens and the modeling happens. sent9: the anestrousness does not occur if the fact that the modeling occurs and the electrophoreticness does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the modeling does not occur then the electrophoreticness but not the proofreading happens. sent11: the adaptation occurs. sent12: the skit does not occur if the preying philosopher occurs. sent13: the presidentialness does not occur if the nonspecificness does not occur and the ratcheting Epirus does not occur. sent14: if the preying philosopher occurs then the ratcheting Epirus does not occur and the skit does not occur. sent15: the non-archesporialness is caused by that the livableness occurs and the rambling occurs. sent16: the electrophoreticness occurs. sent17: if the fact that the atrocity does not occur is not false the fact that the guesstimating and the non-Namibianness occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the modeling happens is not wrong.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the electrophoreticness happens and the modeling happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the nonspecificness does not occur.; sent14 & sent4 -> int3: the ratcheting Epirus does not occur and the skit does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the ratcheting Epirus does not occur is not wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the nonspecificness does not occur and the ratcheting Epirus does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the presidentialness does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the ratcheting Saskatoon does not occur and the intensifying fencing does not occur is not correct.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__