there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a purification that it is not nonphotosynthetic and it is not non-hypovolemic is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is not a hemagglutination is not wrong then that it does not dwarf Rallidae and does dwarf mascara is false. sent2: the fact that the fountain is not nonphotosynthetic and is iridaceous is not correct if it is not a kind of a funeral-residence. sent3: that the cascarilla is nonphotosynthetic and it is hypovolemic is not right if it is not a purification. sent4: if the cascarilla is a purification then that it is photosynthetic but not non-hypovolemic is not correct. sent5: that the mascara does not uplift enfilade and is a throw is wrong if it is not a purification. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a taxability that it is not a Tuvalu but tactless is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it does not dwarf mascara then the fact that it is not a Phoebe and it is a kind of a custody does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a purification is correct then the fact that it is nonphotosynthetic and it is hypovolemic is not true. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a purification then it is a kind of non-nonphotosynthetic thing that is hypovolemic. sent10: there is something such that if it is not instructive then the fact that it is not a Vientiane but unfamiliar does not hold. sent11: the cascarilla is not nonphotosynthetic but it is hypovolemic if it is not a purification. sent12: if the cascarilla is not chaetal the fact that it is not factory-made and it is nonphotosynthetic does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a Geophilidae the fact that it does not escort ascospore and it interferes atom does not hold. sent14: if the cascarilla is not a hug then the fact that it is a kind of non-hypovolemic thing that dwarfs tracked is incorrect. sent15: the fact that that the cascarilla is both not Thracian and efficacious is true is not right if it is not unacquisitive. sent16: the fact that something is not peaceable but it does dwarf bird is false if it is not a purification. sent17: there is something such that if it does not fashion that it is not a kind of a bench and does uplift rocket is not right. sent18: if the Teflon does not dwarf weekday then the fact that it is not a kind of an anti and interferes reconsideration is not true. sent19: there is something such that if it does not uplift Enterolobium then the fact that it is not forceful and is a Macedonian is not true. sent20: there is something such that if it is a purification the fact that it is not nonphotosynthetic and it is not non-hypovolemic is wrong. sent21: if the cascarilla is not a purification then the fact that it is not nonphotosynthetic and it is hypovolemic does not hold.
sent21 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Austrian is not peaceable and does dwarf bird is incorrect if it is not a kind of a purification.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a purification that it is not nonphotosynthetic and it is not non-hypovolemic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is not a hemagglutination is not wrong then that it does not dwarf Rallidae and does dwarf mascara is false. sent2: the fact that the fountain is not nonphotosynthetic and is iridaceous is not correct if it is not a kind of a funeral-residence. sent3: that the cascarilla is nonphotosynthetic and it is hypovolemic is not right if it is not a purification. sent4: if the cascarilla is a purification then that it is photosynthetic but not non-hypovolemic is not correct. sent5: that the mascara does not uplift enfilade and is a throw is wrong if it is not a purification. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a taxability that it is not a Tuvalu but tactless is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it does not dwarf mascara then the fact that it is not a Phoebe and it is a kind of a custody does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a purification is correct then the fact that it is nonphotosynthetic and it is hypovolemic is not true. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a purification then it is a kind of non-nonphotosynthetic thing that is hypovolemic. sent10: there is something such that if it is not instructive then the fact that it is not a Vientiane but unfamiliar does not hold. sent11: the cascarilla is not nonphotosynthetic but it is hypovolemic if it is not a purification. sent12: if the cascarilla is not chaetal the fact that it is not factory-made and it is nonphotosynthetic does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a Geophilidae the fact that it does not escort ascospore and it interferes atom does not hold. sent14: if the cascarilla is not a hug then the fact that it is a kind of non-hypovolemic thing that dwarfs tracked is incorrect. sent15: the fact that that the cascarilla is both not Thracian and efficacious is true is not right if it is not unacquisitive. sent16: the fact that something is not peaceable but it does dwarf bird is false if it is not a purification. sent17: there is something such that if it does not fashion that it is not a kind of a bench and does uplift rocket is not right. sent18: if the Teflon does not dwarf weekday then the fact that it is not a kind of an anti and interferes reconsideration is not true. sent19: there is something such that if it does not uplift Enterolobium then the fact that it is not forceful and is a Macedonian is not true. sent20: there is something such that if it is a purification the fact that it is not nonphotosynthetic and it is not non-hypovolemic is wrong. sent21: if the cascarilla is not a purification then the fact that it is not nonphotosynthetic and it is hypovolemic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__