the toy does not delineate.
sent1: the Adam does not squire bush and does scorch Transfiguration. sent2: that the flare is perigonal is not incorrect. sent3: the flare is not nonarbitrary if it is a kind of non-perigonal thing that squires bush. sent4: The bush does squire toy. sent5: if a non-greater thing is arthropodal the fact that it does not tour is not false. sent6: the fallboard is perigonal. sent7: the candlesnuffer is not perigonal. sent8: the toy is urinary. sent9: the toy is nonarbitrary. sent10: the flare is arbitrary and arthropodal if that the macintosh is a stickleback hold. sent11: the flare is concentric. sent12: the flare is not arthropodal if it does delineate and is not arbitrary. sent13: the flare is nonarbitrary. sent14: the spouse is perigonal. sent15: if the toy is both a stickleback and perigonal then it is not introspective. sent16: the toy kennels Cuba. sent17: the bunchgrass is not a collectivism if it is a cry that is calcific. sent18: the toy is not introspective if it is not nonarbitrary and it does delineate. sent19: the toy does squire bush. sent20: the flare is providential. sent21: if the flare is nonarbitrary then the toy is not non-arthropodal. sent22: the flare does not delineate if it is nonarbitrary and it is arthropodal. sent23: the toy does not delineate if it is non-introspective and does squire bush. sent24: the flare does not delineate. sent25: if that the toy is arthropodal is not incorrect then it is a stickleback. sent26: the toy does trisect libation and it is a jam. sent27: the jasper is pronounceable and is amethystine.
sent21 & sent13 -> int1: the toy is arthropodal.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the toy is a stickleback.;
if the tailrace is not greater but it is arthropodal then it is not a kind of a tour.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the toy does not delineate. ; $context$ = sent1: the Adam does not squire bush and does scorch Transfiguration. sent2: that the flare is perigonal is not incorrect. sent3: the flare is not nonarbitrary if it is a kind of non-perigonal thing that squires bush. sent4: The bush does squire toy. sent5: if a non-greater thing is arthropodal the fact that it does not tour is not false. sent6: the fallboard is perigonal. sent7: the candlesnuffer is not perigonal. sent8: the toy is urinary. sent9: the toy is nonarbitrary. sent10: the flare is arbitrary and arthropodal if that the macintosh is a stickleback hold. sent11: the flare is concentric. sent12: the flare is not arthropodal if it does delineate and is not arbitrary. sent13: the flare is nonarbitrary. sent14: the spouse is perigonal. sent15: if the toy is both a stickleback and perigonal then it is not introspective. sent16: the toy kennels Cuba. sent17: the bunchgrass is not a collectivism if it is a cry that is calcific. sent18: the toy is not introspective if it is not nonarbitrary and it does delineate. sent19: the toy does squire bush. sent20: the flare is providential. sent21: if the flare is nonarbitrary then the toy is not non-arthropodal. sent22: the flare does not delineate if it is nonarbitrary and it is arthropodal. sent23: the toy does not delineate if it is non-introspective and does squire bush. sent24: the flare does not delineate. sent25: if that the toy is arthropodal is not incorrect then it is a stickleback. sent26: the toy does trisect libation and it is a jam. sent27: the jasper is pronounceable and is amethystine. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent13 -> int1: the toy is arthropodal.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the toy is a stickleback.; __UNKNOWN__