the fact that the metastaticness and the non-lightingness happens does not hold.
sent1: the concocting blues does not occur. sent2: the hijacking happens. sent3: the metastaticness happens. sent4: the concocting positivity occurs. sent5: the yearning does not occur and the concocting inflammation does not occur. sent6: the elementariness does not occur. sent7: if that the bacteriolyticness does not occur and the lightingness does not occur is not right then the hijacking does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the bacteriolyticness does not occur and the lightingness does not occur is not wrong is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the hijacking does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the non-bacteriolyticness and the non-lightingness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the lightingness does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the metastaticness and the non-lightingness happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the concocting blues does not occur. sent2: the hijacking happens. sent3: the metastaticness happens. sent4: the concocting positivity occurs. sent5: the yearning does not occur and the concocting inflammation does not occur. sent6: the elementariness does not occur. sent7: if that the bacteriolyticness does not occur and the lightingness does not occur is not right then the hijacking does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the bacteriolyticness does not occur and the lightingness does not occur is not wrong is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the hijacking does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the non-bacteriolyticness and the non-lightingness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the lightingness does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__