that there exists something such that if it is big then it is not ovoviviparous and it is not acaudate is not right.
sent1: if the chinaberry is big then it is not ovoviviparous. sent2: there exists something such that if it is big it is not ovoviviparous but acaudate. sent3: there exists something such that if it is big it is not acaudate. sent4: there exists something such that if it is big then it is not ovoviviparous. sent5: the chinaberry is not ovoviviparous but it is acaudate if it is big. sent6: there exists something such that if it is big then the fact that it is both ovoviviparous and not acaudate hold. sent7: that there exists something such that if it is diaphyseal then it is aesculapian and it does not vomit is not incorrect. sent8: if the chinaberry is big it is both not ovoviviparous and not acaudate. sent9: there exists something such that if it does neglect uprightness it is not a eclat. sent10: there exists something such that if it yaks then it is a moderatorship and it is not postnatal. sent11: if something does stud iridium then that it is not anthropic and it is not diaphyseal is not wrong. sent12: there is something such that if it neglects reintroduction then it studs Psalm and is not a yak.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does stud iridium then that it is not anthropic and it is not diaphyseal is not incorrect.
sent11 -> int1: if the chicle studs iridium then it is non-anthropic thing that is not diaphyseal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is big then it is not ovoviviparous and it is not acaudate is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chinaberry is big then it is not ovoviviparous. sent2: there exists something such that if it is big it is not ovoviviparous but acaudate. sent3: there exists something such that if it is big it is not acaudate. sent4: there exists something such that if it is big then it is not ovoviviparous. sent5: the chinaberry is not ovoviviparous but it is acaudate if it is big. sent6: there exists something such that if it is big then the fact that it is both ovoviviparous and not acaudate hold. sent7: that there exists something such that if it is diaphyseal then it is aesculapian and it does not vomit is not incorrect. sent8: if the chinaberry is big it is both not ovoviviparous and not acaudate. sent9: there exists something such that if it does neglect uprightness it is not a eclat. sent10: there exists something such that if it yaks then it is a moderatorship and it is not postnatal. sent11: if something does stud iridium then that it is not anthropic and it is not diaphyseal is not wrong. sent12: there is something such that if it neglects reintroduction then it studs Psalm and is not a yak. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__