the cuckoopint is heathlike.
sent1: everything is musculoskeletal. sent2: the cuckoopint is a babble if the bracero is a kind of an accuracy. sent3: if the bracero is not a marmalade the latrine is non-Mozambican. sent4: if the bagger is a harmonics the latrine is Mozambican. sent5: if something is a marmalade it is not heathlike. sent6: if there is something such that it does not remonstrate antihero then that the bracero is a kind of a harmonics and it remonstrate antihero is not right. sent7: there exists something such that it does not remonstrate antihero. sent8: that the glockenspiel is musculoskeletal and is heathlike is false. sent9: the fact that something is a marmalade or does not remonstrate Sphecius or both is right if it is Mozambican. sent10: something is heathlike if it does babble. sent11: the bracero does not remonstrate Sphecius if it is both not an accuracy and a Vanern. sent12: if the glockenspiel does not remonstrate antihero and is musculoskeletal the fact that the bagger is a harmonics hold. sent13: if the bracero is not a harmonics the cuckoopint is a Mozambican and it does babble. sent14: the cuckoopint does babble if that the bracero is not an accuracy and is a Vanern is wrong. sent15: that everything does not remonstrate antihero and is musculoskeletal is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bracero is not an accuracy but it is a Vanern.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the bracero does not remonstrate Sphecius.; int1 -> int2: the bracero either does not remonstrate Sphecius or is not a kind of a marmalade or both.; sent15 -> int3: the glockenspiel does not remonstrate antihero but it is musculoskeletal.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the bagger is harmonics.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the latrine is a Mozambican.; sent10 -> int6: the cuckoopint is heathlike if it does babble.;
the cuckoopint is not heathlike.
sent9 -> int7: the cuckoopint is a marmalade and/or does not remonstrate Sphecius if it is a kind of a Mozambican.; sent7 & sent6 -> int8: that the bracero is a kind of a harmonics and it does remonstrate antihero does not hold.; sent5 -> int9: if the cuckoopint is a marmalade then it is not heathlike.;
$hypothesis$ = the cuckoopint is heathlike. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is musculoskeletal. sent2: the cuckoopint is a babble if the bracero is a kind of an accuracy. sent3: if the bracero is not a marmalade the latrine is non-Mozambican. sent4: if the bagger is a harmonics the latrine is Mozambican. sent5: if something is a marmalade it is not heathlike. sent6: if there is something such that it does not remonstrate antihero then that the bracero is a kind of a harmonics and it remonstrate antihero is not right. sent7: there exists something such that it does not remonstrate antihero. sent8: that the glockenspiel is musculoskeletal and is heathlike is false. sent9: the fact that something is a marmalade or does not remonstrate Sphecius or both is right if it is Mozambican. sent10: something is heathlike if it does babble. sent11: the bracero does not remonstrate Sphecius if it is both not an accuracy and a Vanern. sent12: if the glockenspiel does not remonstrate antihero and is musculoskeletal the fact that the bagger is a harmonics hold. sent13: if the bracero is not a harmonics the cuckoopint is a Mozambican and it does babble. sent14: the cuckoopint does babble if that the bracero is not an accuracy and is a Vanern is wrong. sent15: that everything does not remonstrate antihero and is musculoskeletal is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bracero is not an accuracy but it is a Vanern.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the bracero does not remonstrate Sphecius.; int1 -> int2: the bracero either does not remonstrate Sphecius or is not a kind of a marmalade or both.; sent15 -> int3: the glockenspiel does not remonstrate antihero but it is musculoskeletal.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the bagger is harmonics.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the latrine is a Mozambican.; sent10 -> int6: the cuckoopint is heathlike if it does babble.; __UNKNOWN__