the amorist is either not Satanic or interdepartmental or both.
sent1: the cat is unsteady if it is both a links and apogean. sent2: something that is a links and is not apogean is unsteady. sent3: if something is a polysaccharide the fact that it is both not a cloaca and not a otolaryngologist is not true. sent4: the fact that the amorist is Satanic and/or is interdepartmental hold. sent5: the fact that the yam is not unservile is true. sent6: that the amorist is interdepartmental hold if the cat is unsteady. sent7: if the fact that the cat is not unsteady but it is a primatology is not false then the fact that the amorist is not a links is right. sent8: everything is a polysaccharide. sent9: the fact that the cat is not apogean is right. sent10: the cat is both a links and not apogean if there is something such that it is not unservile. sent11: if that something is not carinal and/or it is a burbot is not false then the cat is not daisylike. sent12: if something is not a kind of a links and is apogean then the fact that it is unservile hold. sent13: there is something such that it is unservile. sent14: either something is not carinal or it is a burbot or both. sent15: if a unservile thing is not Satanic then it is not non-apogean. sent16: something is unsteady if it is a links and apogean. sent17: if something is unservile then that it is not Satanic and/or it is interdepartmental does not hold. sent18: the cat is not apogean if there are non-unservile things. sent19: the cat is either not interdepartmental or a links or both.
sent5 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not unservile.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the cat is a kind of a links but it is not apogean.; sent2 -> int3: if the cat is a links and is not apogean then it is unsteady.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cat is unsteady.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the amorist is interdepartmental.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that the amorist is not Satanic or it is interdepartmental or both is wrong.
sent17 -> int6: the fact that the amorist either is not Satanic or is interdepartmental or both does not hold if it is unservile.; sent12 -> int7: if the amorist is both not a links and apogean then that it is unservile hold.; sent14 & sent11 -> int8: the cat is not daisylike.; sent3 -> int9: if the meitnerium is a polysaccharide the fact that it is not a kind of a cloaca and it is not a otolaryngologist is incorrect.; sent8 -> int10: the meitnerium is a polysaccharide.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the meitnerium is not a cloaca and it is not a otolaryngologist is false.; int11 -> int12: there exists nothing such that it is not a cloaca and not a otolaryngologist.; int12 -> int13: that the cold is not a cloaca and is not a kind of a otolaryngologist is not correct.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a cloaca and it is not a otolaryngologist is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the amorist is either not Satanic or interdepartmental or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the cat is unsteady if it is both a links and apogean. sent2: something that is a links and is not apogean is unsteady. sent3: if something is a polysaccharide the fact that it is both not a cloaca and not a otolaryngologist is not true. sent4: the fact that the amorist is Satanic and/or is interdepartmental hold. sent5: the fact that the yam is not unservile is true. sent6: that the amorist is interdepartmental hold if the cat is unsteady. sent7: if the fact that the cat is not unsteady but it is a primatology is not false then the fact that the amorist is not a links is right. sent8: everything is a polysaccharide. sent9: the fact that the cat is not apogean is right. sent10: the cat is both a links and not apogean if there is something such that it is not unservile. sent11: if that something is not carinal and/or it is a burbot is not false then the cat is not daisylike. sent12: if something is not a kind of a links and is apogean then the fact that it is unservile hold. sent13: there is something such that it is unservile. sent14: either something is not carinal or it is a burbot or both. sent15: if a unservile thing is not Satanic then it is not non-apogean. sent16: something is unsteady if it is a links and apogean. sent17: if something is unservile then that it is not Satanic and/or it is interdepartmental does not hold. sent18: the cat is not apogean if there are non-unservile things. sent19: the cat is either not interdepartmental or a links or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not unservile.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the cat is a kind of a links but it is not apogean.; sent2 -> int3: if the cat is a links and is not apogean then it is unsteady.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cat is unsteady.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the amorist is interdepartmental.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__