there is something such that it is a Sarcoptidae.
sent1: if the rejuvenation is a kind of an acuteness and it is autobiographical then it is not a baseness. sent2: the rejuvenation is both not a Sarcoptidae and attritional if the manakin does not restart candlepin. sent3: there is something such that that it is an olive that does include subtraction is incorrect. sent4: if the drink is not unripe then the rejuvenation is not a kind of a baseness but it is a Sarcoptidae. sent5: the rejuvenation is not thoughtless. sent6: the manakin is not an acuteness if it is non-attritional and it is anticlimactic. sent7: if that the manakin is not Australasian is not wrong the rejuvenation is not autobiographical. sent8: the manakin is not a kind of a baseness and is a kind of an acuteness if the rejuvenation is not autobiographical. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is anticlimactic and it is autobiographical is incorrect. sent10: the rejuvenation is not attritional. sent11: the fact that the manakin is anticlimactic hold. sent12: the drink does not restart candlepin if there exists something such that the fact that it is Australasian and it is autobiographical is wrong. sent13: if something does not harden rejuvenation then it is not a Simpson. sent14: the rejuvenation is not unripe. sent15: the drink does not rouge. sent16: the manakin is not bucolic if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an acuteness. sent17: the manakin is a baseness. sent18: the manakin is not a Leto. sent19: the rejuvenation is not anticlimactic but it is autobiographical if the fact that the manakin is not a baseness is true. sent20: the fact that the rejuvenation does not restart candlepin is correct if there is something such that the fact that it is a baseness and is autobiographical is wrong. sent21: the fact that something is both Australasian and autobiographical does not hold if it is not a kind of an acuteness. sent22: something is not unripe if it does not restart candlepin.
sent21 -> int1: that the manakin is Australasian and it is autobiographical does not hold if it is not an acuteness.; sent22 -> int2: if that the drink does not restart candlepin is correct it is ripe.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is a Sarcoptidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rejuvenation is a kind of an acuteness and it is autobiographical then it is not a baseness. sent2: the rejuvenation is both not a Sarcoptidae and attritional if the manakin does not restart candlepin. sent3: there is something such that that it is an olive that does include subtraction is incorrect. sent4: if the drink is not unripe then the rejuvenation is not a kind of a baseness but it is a Sarcoptidae. sent5: the rejuvenation is not thoughtless. sent6: the manakin is not an acuteness if it is non-attritional and it is anticlimactic. sent7: if that the manakin is not Australasian is not wrong the rejuvenation is not autobiographical. sent8: the manakin is not a kind of a baseness and is a kind of an acuteness if the rejuvenation is not autobiographical. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is anticlimactic and it is autobiographical is incorrect. sent10: the rejuvenation is not attritional. sent11: the fact that the manakin is anticlimactic hold. sent12: the drink does not restart candlepin if there exists something such that the fact that it is Australasian and it is autobiographical is wrong. sent13: if something does not harden rejuvenation then it is not a Simpson. sent14: the rejuvenation is not unripe. sent15: the drink does not rouge. sent16: the manakin is not bucolic if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an acuteness. sent17: the manakin is a baseness. sent18: the manakin is not a Leto. sent19: the rejuvenation is not anticlimactic but it is autobiographical if the fact that the manakin is not a baseness is true. sent20: the fact that the rejuvenation does not restart candlepin is correct if there is something such that the fact that it is a baseness and is autobiographical is wrong. sent21: the fact that something is both Australasian and autobiographical does not hold if it is not a kind of an acuteness. sent22: something is not unripe if it does not restart candlepin. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: that the manakin is Australasian and it is autobiographical does not hold if it is not an acuteness.; sent22 -> int2: if that the drink does not restart candlepin is correct it is ripe.; __UNKNOWN__