the titfer is not a Lindbergh if that the viewpoint is a semitrance that is not transcendental does not hold.
sent1: the titfer is a Lindbergh. sent2: if that the viewpoint is not invasive and is not a kind of a lactobacillus is incorrect it is invasive. sent3: if the fact that the viewpoint is both a semitrance and not transcendental is incorrect the titfer is a Lindbergh. sent4: if the viewpoint is not non-transcendental the titfer is not a kind of a Lindbergh. sent5: that the viewpoint is invasive and not a lactobacillus is false. sent6: the fact that the viewpoint is not invasive and it is not a lactobacillus is incorrect. sent7: something fingers eyelet if it is transcendental. sent8: the titfer is a Lindbergh if the viewpoint fingers eyelet and is invasive. sent9: the titfer does finger eyelet and it is invasive if the Paiute is not a Lindbergh. sent10: something is a Lindbergh if the fact that it is transcendental and it does not finger eyelet does not hold. sent11: if the eyelet does not laicize trial either the Viola is a lactobacillus or it is not a bag or both. sent12: if the fact that something is a semitrance but it is not transcendental is not correct then that it fingers eyelet hold.
sent12 -> int1: the viewpoint does finger eyelet if the fact that it is a kind of a semitrance and it is non-transcendental is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the viewpoint is both a semitrance and not transcendental does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the viewpoint does finger eyelet.; sent2 & sent6 -> int3: the viewpoint is invasive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the viewpoint does finger eyelet and is invasive is correct.;
that the titfer is transcendental is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the titfer is not a Lindbergh if that the viewpoint is a semitrance that is not transcendental does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the titfer is a Lindbergh. sent2: if that the viewpoint is not invasive and is not a kind of a lactobacillus is incorrect it is invasive. sent3: if the fact that the viewpoint is both a semitrance and not transcendental is incorrect the titfer is a Lindbergh. sent4: if the viewpoint is not non-transcendental the titfer is not a kind of a Lindbergh. sent5: that the viewpoint is invasive and not a lactobacillus is false. sent6: the fact that the viewpoint is not invasive and it is not a lactobacillus is incorrect. sent7: something fingers eyelet if it is transcendental. sent8: the titfer is a Lindbergh if the viewpoint fingers eyelet and is invasive. sent9: the titfer does finger eyelet and it is invasive if the Paiute is not a Lindbergh. sent10: something is a Lindbergh if the fact that it is transcendental and it does not finger eyelet does not hold. sent11: if the eyelet does not laicize trial either the Viola is a lactobacillus or it is not a bag or both. sent12: if the fact that something is a semitrance but it is not transcendental is not correct then that it fingers eyelet hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the viewpoint does finger eyelet if the fact that it is a kind of a semitrance and it is non-transcendental is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the viewpoint is both a semitrance and not transcendental does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the viewpoint does finger eyelet.; sent2 & sent6 -> int3: the viewpoint is invasive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the viewpoint does finger eyelet and is invasive is correct.; __UNKNOWN__