there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a pika is not incorrect then it is a legume.
sent1: if that either the abiogenist is revocable or it is non-terminological or both is not incorrect that it does overturn hold. sent2: if the hibiscus is not terminological it is a legume. sent3: either the hibiscus is a kind of an overturn or it does not orchestrate gavial or both. sent4: the hibiscus is a pika and/or terminological. sent5: something is either a legume or not terminological or both if the fact that it is not a kind of a pika hold. sent6: if the hibiscus is a legume then it is not non-mutant.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hibiscus is a pika.; assump1 -> int1: the hibiscus is a pika and/or it is not terminological.;
that the blastomycete is terminological is not false.
sent5 -> int2: if the hibiscus is not a kind of a pika it is either a legume or not terminological or both.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a pika is not incorrect then it is a legume. ; $context$ = sent1: if that either the abiogenist is revocable or it is non-terminological or both is not incorrect that it does overturn hold. sent2: if the hibiscus is not terminological it is a legume. sent3: either the hibiscus is a kind of an overturn or it does not orchestrate gavial or both. sent4: the hibiscus is a pika and/or terminological. sent5: something is either a legume or not terminological or both if the fact that it is not a kind of a pika hold. sent6: if the hibiscus is a legume then it is not non-mutant. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hibiscus is a pika.; assump1 -> int1: the hibiscus is a pika and/or it is not terminological.; __UNKNOWN__