the Kansa is not philharmonic.
sent1: if the Atrovent is not a Ereshkigal the Kansa is a Ereshkigal. sent2: the fact that the Atrovent is loamy but it does not replicate self-stimulation is not correct if there exists something such that it does not engender. sent3: if the sneerer is a Ereshkigal and it is a kind of a Monet then the Atrovent is not philharmonic. sent4: the Kansa is a Ereshkigal. sent5: the stenograph is not a colonnade and does metabolize heartbeat. sent6: the Kansa is not a Ereshkigal and it is not a kind of a burette if the sneerer is a Annona. sent7: the sneerer is a burette but it is not philharmonic if the Atrovent is a Annona. sent8: the Kansa is supernaturalist. sent9: if the Kansa does not squire pythium then the Atrovent does squire pythium. sent10: if the sneerer does squire pythium and is a kind of a Monet then the Atrovent is not a kind of a Ereshkigal. sent11: if something does replicate self-stimulation it is a kind of a Annona. sent12: if something does squire pythium then it is philharmonic. sent13: the Kansa is a kind of a Monet. sent14: the caput is a Ereshkigal. sent15: the sneerer is a Monet. sent16: something squires pythium and is a Monet if it is not a Ereshkigal. sent17: the Kansa is a Ereshkigal but it is not philharmonic if the Atrovent is not a kind of a Ereshkigal. sent18: something does squire pythium and/or it is a Monet if the fact that it is not a Ereshkigal hold. sent19: if the stenograph is not a colonnade but it metabolizes heartbeat the Bible does not engender. sent20: The pythium does squire sneerer. sent21: the percale is a kind of a Monet.
that the carbonado does not squire pythium hold.
$hypothesis$ = the Kansa is not philharmonic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Atrovent is not a Ereshkigal the Kansa is a Ereshkigal. sent2: the fact that the Atrovent is loamy but it does not replicate self-stimulation is not correct if there exists something such that it does not engender. sent3: if the sneerer is a Ereshkigal and it is a kind of a Monet then the Atrovent is not philharmonic. sent4: the Kansa is a Ereshkigal. sent5: the stenograph is not a colonnade and does metabolize heartbeat. sent6: the Kansa is not a Ereshkigal and it is not a kind of a burette if the sneerer is a Annona. sent7: the sneerer is a burette but it is not philharmonic if the Atrovent is a Annona. sent8: the Kansa is supernaturalist. sent9: if the Kansa does not squire pythium then the Atrovent does squire pythium. sent10: if the sneerer does squire pythium and is a kind of a Monet then the Atrovent is not a kind of a Ereshkigal. sent11: if something does replicate self-stimulation it is a kind of a Annona. sent12: if something does squire pythium then it is philharmonic. sent13: the Kansa is a kind of a Monet. sent14: the caput is a Ereshkigal. sent15: the sneerer is a Monet. sent16: something squires pythium and is a Monet if it is not a Ereshkigal. sent17: the Kansa is a Ereshkigal but it is not philharmonic if the Atrovent is not a kind of a Ereshkigal. sent18: something does squire pythium and/or it is a Monet if the fact that it is not a Ereshkigal hold. sent19: if the stenograph is not a colonnade but it metabolizes heartbeat the Bible does not engender. sent20: The pythium does squire sneerer. sent21: the percale is a kind of a Monet. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__