the fact that if the rendering Lir occurs the roulette does not occur is not true.
sent1: if the roulette occurs and the stifling overlay happens then the rendering Lir does not occur. sent2: the counterpunch occurs. sent3: that the rendering Lir happens triggers that the roulette happens. sent4: if the anthropometry and the rendering quatrain happens then the dripping happens. sent5: if the counterpunch happens the stifling overlay occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the rendering Lir happens is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roulette occurs.; sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the stifling overlay happens.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: both the roulette and the stifling overlay occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: that the rendering Lir does not occur is correct.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the roulette does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the rendering Lir occurs the roulette does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the roulette occurs and the stifling overlay happens then the rendering Lir does not occur. sent2: the counterpunch occurs. sent3: that the rendering Lir happens triggers that the roulette happens. sent4: if the anthropometry and the rendering quatrain happens then the dripping happens. sent5: if the counterpunch happens the stifling overlay occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the rendering Lir happens is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roulette occurs.; sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the stifling overlay happens.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: both the roulette and the stifling overlay occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: that the rendering Lir does not occur is correct.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the roulette does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__