the bulbaceousness does not occur if that the representation does not occur but the bulbaceousness occurs is not true.
sent1: the fact that the mechanism does not occur and the nourishment occurs is not right. sent2: that the representation does not occur is right. sent3: if that that the redeployment and the cranking skimming occurs does not hold hold the cranking skimming does not occur. sent4: the fact that the non-antrorseness and the fooling balker happens is incorrect. sent5: that the footing occurs is prevented by that not the waxing but the footing happens. sent6: that the atmosphere does not occur is right. sent7: the inflation does not occur. sent8: the hanging does not occur and the co-option happens if the representation occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bulbaceousness happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: not the representation but the bulbaceousness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the representation does not occur but the bulbaceousness happens does not hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the bulbaceousness does not occur is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the hanging does not occur and the co-option occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the bulbaceousness does not occur if that the representation does not occur but the bulbaceousness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mechanism does not occur and the nourishment occurs is not right. sent2: that the representation does not occur is right. sent3: if that that the redeployment and the cranking skimming occurs does not hold hold the cranking skimming does not occur. sent4: the fact that the non-antrorseness and the fooling balker happens is incorrect. sent5: that the footing occurs is prevented by that not the waxing but the footing happens. sent6: that the atmosphere does not occur is right. sent7: the inflation does not occur. sent8: the hanging does not occur and the co-option happens if the representation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bulbaceousness happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: not the representation but the bulbaceousness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the representation does not occur but the bulbaceousness happens does not hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the bulbaceousness does not occur is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__