there is something such that it is not hatless.
sent1: if that the linocut either is not archdiocesan or is mecopterous or both does not hold then it is cereal. sent2: the fact that the woodsman does not reunify but it rummages scalpel does not hold. sent3: the linocut reunifies if the fact that something is not archdiocesan is true. sent4: if something does rummage scalpel that that the woodsman does not reunify but it rummage scalpel is not correct is not wrong. sent5: if something that reunifies rummages gulch then it is not hatless. sent6: the epidemiologist does reunify if the fact that the woodsman does not reunify and it does not rummage scalpel is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the woodsman does rummage scalpel is correct then the epidemiologist reunifies. sent8: if that something is not archdiocesan and/or it is not mecopterous is wrong then it is a cereal. sent9: the linocut is hatless if the fact that the epidemiologist is not hatless and it is not mecopterous does not hold. sent10: if something rummages scalpel then the fact that the woodsman does not reunify and it does not rummages scalpel is not true. sent11: there is something such that it does rummage scalpel. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is hatless hold. sent13: there is something such that it is a damson. sent14: the linocut is mecopterous. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a damson. sent16: the presenter is hatless. sent17: if the linocut is a kind of a cereal the epidemiologist does rummage gulch.
sent8 -> int1: the linocut is a cereal if the fact that it is non-archdiocesan and/or non-mecopterous is false.; sent11 & sent10 -> int2: that the woodsman does not reunify and does not rummage scalpel is not right.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the epidemiologist does reunify.; sent5 -> int4: the epidemiologist is not hatless if it reunifies and it rummages gulch.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not hatless. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the linocut either is not archdiocesan or is mecopterous or both does not hold then it is cereal. sent2: the fact that the woodsman does not reunify but it rummages scalpel does not hold. sent3: the linocut reunifies if the fact that something is not archdiocesan is true. sent4: if something does rummage scalpel that that the woodsman does not reunify but it rummage scalpel is not correct is not wrong. sent5: if something that reunifies rummages gulch then it is not hatless. sent6: the epidemiologist does reunify if the fact that the woodsman does not reunify and it does not rummage scalpel is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the woodsman does rummage scalpel is correct then the epidemiologist reunifies. sent8: if that something is not archdiocesan and/or it is not mecopterous is wrong then it is a cereal. sent9: the linocut is hatless if the fact that the epidemiologist is not hatless and it is not mecopterous does not hold. sent10: if something rummages scalpel then the fact that the woodsman does not reunify and it does not rummages scalpel is not true. sent11: there is something such that it does rummage scalpel. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is hatless hold. sent13: there is something such that it is a damson. sent14: the linocut is mecopterous. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a damson. sent16: the presenter is hatless. sent17: if the linocut is a kind of a cereal the epidemiologist does rummage gulch. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the linocut is a cereal if the fact that it is non-archdiocesan and/or non-mecopterous is false.; sent11 & sent10 -> int2: that the woodsman does not reunify and does not rummage scalpel is not right.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the epidemiologist does reunify.; sent5 -> int4: the epidemiologist is not hatless if it reunifies and it rummages gulch.; __UNKNOWN__