the Somerset does not occur.
sent1: the professional results in that the angriness happens but the foaling mesa does not occur. sent2: that the oral does not occur or the symbolizing does not occur or both does not hold. sent3: if the fact that either the oral does not occur or the symbolizing does not occur or both is not correct the fact that the bimetallisticness occurs is not false. sent4: the triage occurs and the angriness happens. sent5: the triage does not occur if the bimetallisticness happens and the Somerset happens.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the bimetallisticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Somerset happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bimetallisticness happens and the Somerset occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the triage does not occur.; sent4 -> int4: the triage occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the sterilizing comb happens.
$hypothesis$ = the Somerset does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the professional results in that the angriness happens but the foaling mesa does not occur. sent2: that the oral does not occur or the symbolizing does not occur or both does not hold. sent3: if the fact that either the oral does not occur or the symbolizing does not occur or both is not correct the fact that the bimetallisticness occurs is not false. sent4: the triage occurs and the angriness happens. sent5: the triage does not occur if the bimetallisticness happens and the Somerset happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the bimetallisticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Somerset happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bimetallisticness happens and the Somerset occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the triage does not occur.; sent4 -> int4: the triage occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__