the flocking feist does not occur.
sent1: that the immorality does not occur and/or that the flocking Schnabel occurs is triggered by that the segregating rocker occurs. sent2: if the dadoing fugu does not occur then that the bonanza happens but the flocking feist does not occur is wrong. sent3: if that not the armillariness but the flocking feist happens is not true the armillariness occurs. sent4: if that the carjacking Google does not occur but the incomparableness happens does not hold then that the incomparableness does not occur hold. sent5: if the fact that the calico does not occur is not false then that the precentorship and the non-Ibsenianness occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the dadoing profanity occurs is not incorrect then the non-illegibleness and the muffling occurs. sent7: either that the immorality does not occur or that the flocking Schnabel occurs or both leads to that the reconciliation does not occur. sent8: the segregating Allen does not occur. sent9: the dadoing fugu does not occur if the segregating Allen does not occur. sent10: the cut-in happens. sent11: that that that not the dadoing fugu but the segregating Allen happens hold does not hold if the incomparableness happens is true. sent12: that the segregating sketchbook does not occur and the conic does not occur hold if that the illegibleness does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: if the conic does not occur the bonanza happens and/or the cut-in occurs. sent14: the carjacking Google does not occur if the fact that the carjacking Google and the illegibleness occurs does not hold. sent15: the fact that the non-armillaryness and the flocking feist occurs is not right if the dadoing fugu happens. sent16: the segregating Allen happens and the dadoing fugu occurs if the incomparableness does not occur. sent17: the dadoing profanity happens and the disruption occurs. sent18: the bonanza and the cut-in happens. sent19: if the cut-in does not occur then the flocking feist does not occur but the bonanza occurs. sent20: if the reconciliation does not occur then the fact that the carjacking Google does not occur and the incomparableness happens is not correct. sent21: that the flocking innateness but not the flocking pepperidge occurs does not hold if that the carjacking Trevithick does not occur is right.
sent18 -> int1: the bonanza occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flocking feist does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bonanza happens and the flocking feist does not occur.; sent9 & sent8 -> int3: the dadoing fugu does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: that the bonanza but not the flocking feist occurs does not hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the flocking feist does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the flocking feist does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the immorality does not occur and/or that the flocking Schnabel occurs is triggered by that the segregating rocker occurs. sent2: if the dadoing fugu does not occur then that the bonanza happens but the flocking feist does not occur is wrong. sent3: if that not the armillariness but the flocking feist happens is not true the armillariness occurs. sent4: if that the carjacking Google does not occur but the incomparableness happens does not hold then that the incomparableness does not occur hold. sent5: if the fact that the calico does not occur is not false then that the precentorship and the non-Ibsenianness occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the dadoing profanity occurs is not incorrect then the non-illegibleness and the muffling occurs. sent7: either that the immorality does not occur or that the flocking Schnabel occurs or both leads to that the reconciliation does not occur. sent8: the segregating Allen does not occur. sent9: the dadoing fugu does not occur if the segregating Allen does not occur. sent10: the cut-in happens. sent11: that that that not the dadoing fugu but the segregating Allen happens hold does not hold if the incomparableness happens is true. sent12: that the segregating sketchbook does not occur and the conic does not occur hold if that the illegibleness does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: if the conic does not occur the bonanza happens and/or the cut-in occurs. sent14: the carjacking Google does not occur if the fact that the carjacking Google and the illegibleness occurs does not hold. sent15: the fact that the non-armillaryness and the flocking feist occurs is not right if the dadoing fugu happens. sent16: the segregating Allen happens and the dadoing fugu occurs if the incomparableness does not occur. sent17: the dadoing profanity happens and the disruption occurs. sent18: the bonanza and the cut-in happens. sent19: if the cut-in does not occur then the flocking feist does not occur but the bonanza occurs. sent20: if the reconciliation does not occur then the fact that the carjacking Google does not occur and the incomparableness happens is not correct. sent21: that the flocking innateness but not the flocking pepperidge occurs does not hold if that the carjacking Trevithick does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the bonanza occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flocking feist does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bonanza happens and the flocking feist does not occur.; sent9 & sent8 -> int3: the dadoing fugu does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: that the bonanza but not the flocking feist occurs does not hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__