the accepting misalignment happens.
sent1: the worsting and the dialectics occurs. sent2: if the numericalness occurs then the entraining does not occur. sent3: the articulating brings about that the hurl happens. sent4: the breakfasting Phlebotomus and the slider happens if the entraining does not occur. sent5: the surfaceness happens. sent6: if the articulateness does not occur the siege occurs but the improvement does not occur. sent7: that the surface occurs brings about that the numericalness occurs. sent8: that the accepting misalignment does not occur is prevented by that the siege but not the improvement happens. sent9: the breakfasting Phlebotomus does not occur if the sights does not occur. sent10: that the siege does not occur brings about that the breakfasting Phlebotomus happens and the sighting occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the articulateness occurs hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the hurl occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the worst happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hurling occurs and the worst happens.; sent7 & sent5 -> int4: the numericalness occurs.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the entraining does not occur.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: both the breakfasting Phlebotomus and the slider occurs.; int6 -> int7: the breakfasting Phlebotomus occurs.;
the polo does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the accepting misalignment happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the worsting and the dialectics occurs. sent2: if the numericalness occurs then the entraining does not occur. sent3: the articulating brings about that the hurl happens. sent4: the breakfasting Phlebotomus and the slider happens if the entraining does not occur. sent5: the surfaceness happens. sent6: if the articulateness does not occur the siege occurs but the improvement does not occur. sent7: that the surface occurs brings about that the numericalness occurs. sent8: that the accepting misalignment does not occur is prevented by that the siege but not the improvement happens. sent9: the breakfasting Phlebotomus does not occur if the sights does not occur. sent10: that the siege does not occur brings about that the breakfasting Phlebotomus happens and the sighting occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the articulateness occurs hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the hurl occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the worst happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hurling occurs and the worst happens.; sent7 & sent5 -> int4: the numericalness occurs.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the entraining does not occur.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: both the breakfasting Phlebotomus and the slider occurs.; int6 -> int7: the breakfasting Phlebotomus occurs.; __UNKNOWN__