the monetariness occurs and the ELINT does not occur.
sent1: if the purring does not occur then that the fact that the contemplation occurs hold is incorrect. sent2: the contemplation happens. sent3: if that the accurateness and the purr happens is not right then that the contemplation does not occur hold. sent4: if the stuffing convert does not occur that that both the accurateness and the purr happens is correct is wrong. sent5: that the monetariness happens is not wrong if the overindulgence does not occur. sent6: if the pestling adjustment does not occur the fact that both the monetariness and the ELINT occurs is not correct. sent7: if that the pestling adjustment does not occur is right the fact that the monetariness happens but the ELINT does not occur is not true. sent8: the pestling adjustment does not occur if the overindulgence or the reincarnation or both occurs. sent9: the overindulgence does not occur if that the reincarnation occurs and/or the pestling adjustment does not occur is not right. sent10: that the stuffing girder does not occur leads to that the monetariness occurs and the ELINT occurs. sent11: the fact that the monetariness and the ELINT occurs is wrong. sent12: the stuffing convert prevents that the overindulgence does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stuffing convert does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the accurateness occurs and the purring occurs is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the contemplation does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stuffing convert happens.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the overindulgence occurs.; int5 -> int6: the overindulgence or the reincarnation or both occurs.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the pestling adjustment does not occur.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the monetariness happens but the ELINT does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the monetariness occurs and the ELINT does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the purring does not occur then that the fact that the contemplation occurs hold is incorrect. sent2: the contemplation happens. sent3: if that the accurateness and the purr happens is not right then that the contemplation does not occur hold. sent4: if the stuffing convert does not occur that that both the accurateness and the purr happens is correct is wrong. sent5: that the monetariness happens is not wrong if the overindulgence does not occur. sent6: if the pestling adjustment does not occur the fact that both the monetariness and the ELINT occurs is not correct. sent7: if that the pestling adjustment does not occur is right the fact that the monetariness happens but the ELINT does not occur is not true. sent8: the pestling adjustment does not occur if the overindulgence or the reincarnation or both occurs. sent9: the overindulgence does not occur if that the reincarnation occurs and/or the pestling adjustment does not occur is not right. sent10: that the stuffing girder does not occur leads to that the monetariness occurs and the ELINT occurs. sent11: the fact that the monetariness and the ELINT occurs is wrong. sent12: the stuffing convert prevents that the overindulgence does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stuffing convert does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the accurateness occurs and the purring occurs is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the contemplation does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stuffing convert happens.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the overindulgence occurs.; int5 -> int6: the overindulgence or the reincarnation or both occurs.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the pestling adjustment does not occur.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__