the empiricist is both a Atlantic and non-brotherly.
sent1: the keelson does grind rheometer. sent2: that the empiricist is not brotherly is true. sent3: the hydroxide does not grind rheometer. sent4: the fortuneteller is a old-fashionedness. sent5: the keelson is an alpaca. sent6: if the keelson is not a kind of a worse then it is a fooling. sent7: the chamberpot is a Namibian. sent8: the keelson is not Namibian. sent9: the empiricist grinds rheometer and fools if it is not a old-fashionedness. sent10: the keelson is a kind of Atlantic thing that is a Namibian if it does not fool. sent11: the fact that the empiricist is isthmian and it does conscript hydroxide is true. sent12: the empiricist is orthodontics and it is eschatological. sent13: there exists something such that it is a startling. sent14: the keelson is not a old-fashionedness. sent15: the empiricist is binary. sent16: the Java does grind rheometer. sent17: the keelson is brotherly. sent18: there exists something such that it is a niqaabi. sent19: the empiricist is a kind of a startling. sent20: if something that is brotherly is a kind of a old-fashionedness that the empiricist grinds rheometer hold. sent21: the empiricist grinds rheometer. sent22: the empiricist is a kind of cementitious thing that is not a practice. sent23: the empiricist is behavioral. sent24: if the empiricist is a fooling it is a kind of a Atlantic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the empiricist is a old-fashionedness.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: the empiricist is a kind of a old-fashionedness that is a startling.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a old-fashionedness and is a kind of a startling.;
$hypothesis$ = the empiricist is both a Atlantic and non-brotherly. ; $context$ = sent1: the keelson does grind rheometer. sent2: that the empiricist is not brotherly is true. sent3: the hydroxide does not grind rheometer. sent4: the fortuneteller is a old-fashionedness. sent5: the keelson is an alpaca. sent6: if the keelson is not a kind of a worse then it is a fooling. sent7: the chamberpot is a Namibian. sent8: the keelson is not Namibian. sent9: the empiricist grinds rheometer and fools if it is not a old-fashionedness. sent10: the keelson is a kind of Atlantic thing that is a Namibian if it does not fool. sent11: the fact that the empiricist is isthmian and it does conscript hydroxide is true. sent12: the empiricist is orthodontics and it is eschatological. sent13: there exists something such that it is a startling. sent14: the keelson is not a old-fashionedness. sent15: the empiricist is binary. sent16: the Java does grind rheometer. sent17: the keelson is brotherly. sent18: there exists something such that it is a niqaabi. sent19: the empiricist is a kind of a startling. sent20: if something that is brotherly is a kind of a old-fashionedness that the empiricist grinds rheometer hold. sent21: the empiricist grinds rheometer. sent22: the empiricist is a kind of cementitious thing that is not a practice. sent23: the empiricist is behavioral. sent24: if the empiricist is a fooling it is a kind of a Atlantic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the empiricist is a old-fashionedness.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: the empiricist is a kind of a old-fashionedness that is a startling.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a old-fashionedness and is a kind of a startling.; __UNKNOWN__