the pizzeria is nonmagnetic.
sent1: the rotogravure is not a kind of a passerine if the colorimeter does elope and/or it is not a passerine. sent2: if the sister is not a Ruritanian then that the pullover is a towline and does not winnow coralwood is false. sent3: the sister is not a pueblo if the pullover is a kind of a passerine. sent4: if something is a progressive then it elopes and/or is not a passerine. sent5: the fact that if the rotogravure is nonpasserine the pizzeria is nonmagnetic is right. sent6: the pullover is a kind of a towline that does not winnow coralwood if it is non-progressive. sent7: if the pullover does winnow coralwood then it is nonmagnetic. sent8: if the fact that there is something such that that it is a pueblo is not incorrect is correct then either the rotogravure is not passerine or it does not elope or both. sent9: if the rotogravure does unpick pomfret then it winnows hypertrophied. sent10: that if the rotogravure is the Ruritanian the rotogravure is a kind of a passerine is right. sent11: if the rotogravure does not elope the pizzeria is nonmagnetic. sent12: the colorimeter is a kind of a progressive if the Warner does not bog nymphet and is not a kind of a progressive. sent13: something is a kind of a pueblo if it is Ruritanian. sent14: the pullover is not progressive. sent15: the sister either is not a pueblo or does not elope or both if there exists something such that it is a kind of a progressive. sent16: the fact that if the fact that something is both Ruritanian and nonmagnetic is wrong then it is not nonmagnetic is correct. sent17: the pullover is not a passerine and/or it does not elope if there exists something such that the fact that it is progressive hold. sent18: the sister is not non-progressive. sent19: the sister is not a kind of a passerine and/or does not winnow coralwood if there is something such that it is a Ruritanian. sent20: the tipster is not a kind of a passerine. sent21: the pizzeria is not nonmagnetic if the sister is nonmagnetic. sent22: the pullover is not a passerine and/or it is not a towline if something is nonmagnetic. sent23: if something yodels oiled it does not bog nymphet and it is not a progressive.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sister is not a Ruritanian.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pullover is a towline and does not winnow coralwood does not hold.; sent6 & sent14 -> int2: the pullover is a kind of a towline that does not winnow coralwood.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sister is a Ruritanian.; sent13 -> int5: if the sister is Ruritanian that it is a kind of a pueblo is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the sister is a pueblo.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a pueblo.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the rotogravure is not a passerine and/or does not elope.; int8 & sent5 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the pizzeria is not nonmagnetic.
sent4 -> int9: the colorimeter elopes and/or it is not passerine if it is a progressive.; sent23 -> int10: the fact that the Warner does not bog nymphet and is not progressive if the Warner does yodel oiled hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the pizzeria is nonmagnetic. ; $context$ = sent1: the rotogravure is not a kind of a passerine if the colorimeter does elope and/or it is not a passerine. sent2: if the sister is not a Ruritanian then that the pullover is a towline and does not winnow coralwood is false. sent3: the sister is not a pueblo if the pullover is a kind of a passerine. sent4: if something is a progressive then it elopes and/or is not a passerine. sent5: the fact that if the rotogravure is nonpasserine the pizzeria is nonmagnetic is right. sent6: the pullover is a kind of a towline that does not winnow coralwood if it is non-progressive. sent7: if the pullover does winnow coralwood then it is nonmagnetic. sent8: if the fact that there is something such that that it is a pueblo is not incorrect is correct then either the rotogravure is not passerine or it does not elope or both. sent9: if the rotogravure does unpick pomfret then it winnows hypertrophied. sent10: that if the rotogravure is the Ruritanian the rotogravure is a kind of a passerine is right. sent11: if the rotogravure does not elope the pizzeria is nonmagnetic. sent12: the colorimeter is a kind of a progressive if the Warner does not bog nymphet and is not a kind of a progressive. sent13: something is a kind of a pueblo if it is Ruritanian. sent14: the pullover is not progressive. sent15: the sister either is not a pueblo or does not elope or both if there exists something such that it is a kind of a progressive. sent16: the fact that if the fact that something is both Ruritanian and nonmagnetic is wrong then it is not nonmagnetic is correct. sent17: the pullover is not a passerine and/or it does not elope if there exists something such that the fact that it is progressive hold. sent18: the sister is not non-progressive. sent19: the sister is not a kind of a passerine and/or does not winnow coralwood if there is something such that it is a Ruritanian. sent20: the tipster is not a kind of a passerine. sent21: the pizzeria is not nonmagnetic if the sister is nonmagnetic. sent22: the pullover is not a passerine and/or it is not a towline if something is nonmagnetic. sent23: if something yodels oiled it does not bog nymphet and it is not a progressive. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sister is not a Ruritanian.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pullover is a towline and does not winnow coralwood does not hold.; sent6 & sent14 -> int2: the pullover is a kind of a towline that does not winnow coralwood.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sister is a Ruritanian.; sent13 -> int5: if the sister is Ruritanian that it is a kind of a pueblo is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the sister is a pueblo.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a pueblo.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the rotogravure is not a passerine and/or does not elope.; int8 & sent5 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__