that the incompleteness but not the silencing car occurs is incorrect if the falseness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the germfreeness but not the galling happens does not hold if the preciseness occurs. sent2: the quintupling handrest does not occur. sent3: the fact that the quintupling Scophthalmus occurs is correct. sent4: the fact that both the scouring skilly and the spectacular happens is incorrect. sent5: the incompleteness happens but the silencing car does not occur. sent6: if the vacationing does not occur that the calisthenicness and the courtship occurs is wrong. sent7: that not the voicing but the newmarket happens is false if the silencing Atropidae does not occur. sent8: if that not the voice but the newmarket occurs does not hold then the falseness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the dehumanization but not the silencing plate happens is not right if the compaction occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the falseness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the silencing Atropidae does not occur.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: that the voicing does not occur but the newmarket occurs does not hold.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the falseness does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the silencing Atropidae happens.;
$hypothesis$ = that the incompleteness but not the silencing car occurs is incorrect if the falseness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the germfreeness but not the galling happens does not hold if the preciseness occurs. sent2: the quintupling handrest does not occur. sent3: the fact that the quintupling Scophthalmus occurs is correct. sent4: the fact that both the scouring skilly and the spectacular happens is incorrect. sent5: the incompleteness happens but the silencing car does not occur. sent6: if the vacationing does not occur that the calisthenicness and the courtship occurs is wrong. sent7: that not the voicing but the newmarket happens is false if the silencing Atropidae does not occur. sent8: if that not the voice but the newmarket occurs does not hold then the falseness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the dehumanization but not the silencing plate happens is not right if the compaction occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the falseness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the silencing Atropidae does not occur.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: that the voicing does not occur but the newmarket occurs does not hold.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the falseness does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the silencing Atropidae happens.; __UNKNOWN__