the concentrate is reasonable.
sent1: the fact that the concentrate is a Scardinius and nettles festoon is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that it does not satisfice and it does not disobey Jarrell. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not satisfice and does not disobey Jarrell is not right the concentrate is calcicolous. sent4: the fact that the concentrate is a Scardinius that does not nettle festoon is incorrect if it does not parry. sent5: if something is calcicolous and it is a mentum it is not a snapper. sent6: the fact that if something does nettle festoon then it is not unreasonable is right. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not satisfice and does not disobey Jarrell is not correct. sent8: if that something is a Scardinius and does not nettle festoon is wrong then it is reasonable. sent9: if the concentrate is not a mentum it is not a parry. sent10: the concentrate is a kind of a snapper if the serval is categorematic.
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the concentrate is calcicolous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the concentrate is a mentum.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the concentrate is calcicolous and is a kind of a mentum.; sent5 -> int3: if the concentrate is calcicolous and it is a mentum then it is not a snapper.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the concentrate is not a snapper.; sent8 -> int5: if the fact that the concentrate is a Scardinius but it does not nettle festoon is false it is not unreasonable.;
$hypothesis$ = the concentrate is reasonable. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the concentrate is a Scardinius and nettles festoon is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that it does not satisfice and it does not disobey Jarrell. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not satisfice and does not disobey Jarrell is not right the concentrate is calcicolous. sent4: the fact that the concentrate is a Scardinius that does not nettle festoon is incorrect if it does not parry. sent5: if something is calcicolous and it is a mentum it is not a snapper. sent6: the fact that if something does nettle festoon then it is not unreasonable is right. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not satisfice and does not disobey Jarrell is not correct. sent8: if that something is a Scardinius and does not nettle festoon is wrong then it is reasonable. sent9: if the concentrate is not a mentum it is not a parry. sent10: the concentrate is a kind of a snapper if the serval is categorematic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the concentrate is calcicolous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the concentrate is a mentum.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the concentrate is calcicolous and is a kind of a mentum.; sent5 -> int3: if the concentrate is calcicolous and it is a mentum then it is not a snapper.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the concentrate is not a snapper.; sent8 -> int5: if the fact that the concentrate is a Scardinius but it does not nettle festoon is false it is not unreasonable.; __UNKNOWN__