the cobble does not occur.
sent1: the Sotho happens if that the Mercurialness occurs hold. sent2: that the yawing does not occur is prevented by that the preclinicalness happens. sent3: that the selfishness does not occur and the sufficing does not occur is false if the mastoidness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the mastoid and the finiteness occurs is wrong the sufficing does not occur. sent5: if that the selfishness does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur is not right then the hailstorm occurs. sent6: if that the finiteness does not occur and/or the mastoidness happens is not right the selfishness does not occur. sent7: that the sufficing does not occur is not false if the finiteness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the magnification does not occur and the newspapering does not occur is incorrect. sent9: if the yawing does not occur then the fact that the preclinicalness but not the hailstorm occurs does not hold. sent10: the Constitution occurs. sent11: if the reinforcing bacon does not occur then that either the infiniteness or the mastoidness or both occurs is incorrect. sent12: if that the yawing happens is right then that the cobbling happens is not false. sent13: the yaw happens if the preclinicalness or the non-Mercurialness or both occurs. sent14: that the reinforcing ramona does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur prevents the Sotho. sent15: if the fact that the selfishness does not occur is not false the fact that not the sufficing but the yawing occurs is false. sent16: if the sufficing does not occur then the fact that the selfishness does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur is not correct. sent17: that the fact that the non-selfishness and the hailstorm occurs does not hold hold. sent18: the fact that the Sotho but not the Mercurialness happens is wrong if the reinforcing ramona occurs. sent19: the yawing does not occur if that not the sufficing but the yawing happens does not hold. sent20: that the intruding foramen does not occur and the bibliothecalness does not occur is false. sent21: if the reinforcing ramona happens the hailstorm does not occur. sent22: if either the reinforcing ramona occurs or the Sotho happens or both then the hailstorm does not occur. sent23: if the preclinicalness happens the reinforcing ramona does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur. sent24: that the non-selfishness and the hailstorm occurs is wrong if the sufficing does not occur. sent25: that both the mastoid and the finiteness happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mercurialness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Sotho occurs.; int1 -> int2: the reinforcing ramona or the Sothoness or both occurs.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the hailstorm does not occur.; sent4 & sent25 -> int4: the fact that the sufficing does not occur is not wrong.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the selfishness does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur is incorrect.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the hailstorm occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Mercurialness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: either the preclinicalness or the non-Mercurialness or both occurs.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the yaw occurs.; int10 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the sweetening ordinand occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the cobble does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the Sotho happens if that the Mercurialness occurs hold. sent2: that the yawing does not occur is prevented by that the preclinicalness happens. sent3: that the selfishness does not occur and the sufficing does not occur is false if the mastoidness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the mastoid and the finiteness occurs is wrong the sufficing does not occur. sent5: if that the selfishness does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur is not right then the hailstorm occurs. sent6: if that the finiteness does not occur and/or the mastoidness happens is not right the selfishness does not occur. sent7: that the sufficing does not occur is not false if the finiteness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the magnification does not occur and the newspapering does not occur is incorrect. sent9: if the yawing does not occur then the fact that the preclinicalness but not the hailstorm occurs does not hold. sent10: the Constitution occurs. sent11: if the reinforcing bacon does not occur then that either the infiniteness or the mastoidness or both occurs is incorrect. sent12: if that the yawing happens is right then that the cobbling happens is not false. sent13: the yaw happens if the preclinicalness or the non-Mercurialness or both occurs. sent14: that the reinforcing ramona does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur prevents the Sotho. sent15: if the fact that the selfishness does not occur is not false the fact that not the sufficing but the yawing occurs is false. sent16: if the sufficing does not occur then the fact that the selfishness does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur is not correct. sent17: that the fact that the non-selfishness and the hailstorm occurs does not hold hold. sent18: the fact that the Sotho but not the Mercurialness happens is wrong if the reinforcing ramona occurs. sent19: the yawing does not occur if that not the sufficing but the yawing happens does not hold. sent20: that the intruding foramen does not occur and the bibliothecalness does not occur is false. sent21: if the reinforcing ramona happens the hailstorm does not occur. sent22: if either the reinforcing ramona occurs or the Sotho happens or both then the hailstorm does not occur. sent23: if the preclinicalness happens the reinforcing ramona does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur. sent24: that the non-selfishness and the hailstorm occurs is wrong if the sufficing does not occur. sent25: that both the mastoid and the finiteness happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mercurialness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Sotho occurs.; int1 -> int2: the reinforcing ramona or the Sothoness or both occurs.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the hailstorm does not occur.; sent4 & sent25 -> int4: the fact that the sufficing does not occur is not wrong.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the selfishness does not occur and the hailstorm does not occur is incorrect.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the hailstorm occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Mercurialness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: either the preclinicalness or the non-Mercurialness or both occurs.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the yaw occurs.; int10 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__