the fact that not the sincereness but the outing occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the expansiveness does not occur if the neglecting canebrake happens and the prestidigitation happens. sent2: the fact that the neglecting canebrake occurs but the proximalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if the fact that either the gastroesophagealness does not occur or the studding nephrectomy happens or both is not right the expansiveness occurs. sent4: if the prestidigitation does not occur then the non-sincereness and the outingness occurs. sent5: that the gastroesophagealness does not occur and/or the studding nephrectomy occurs is incorrect.
sent2 -> int1: the neglecting canebrake happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prestidigitation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the neglecting canebrake happens and the prestidigitation happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the expansiveness does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int4: the expansiveness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the prestidigitation does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the sincereness but the outing occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the expansiveness does not occur if the neglecting canebrake happens and the prestidigitation happens. sent2: the fact that the neglecting canebrake occurs but the proximalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if the fact that either the gastroesophagealness does not occur or the studding nephrectomy happens or both is not right the expansiveness occurs. sent4: if the prestidigitation does not occur then the non-sincereness and the outingness occurs. sent5: that the gastroesophagealness does not occur and/or the studding nephrectomy occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the neglecting canebrake happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prestidigitation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the neglecting canebrake happens and the prestidigitation happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the expansiveness does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int4: the expansiveness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the prestidigitation does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__