the musher is not metacarpal and is not bibliotic.
sent1: if the ovenbird does not reorganize the fact that that the blowtorch does not reorganize and is non-metacarpal is correct is false. sent2: the Carmelite is not tasty. sent3: if the ovenbird is not non-metacarpal then that it does not reorganize and it is bibliotic is not right. sent4: the fact that the ovenbird reorganizes if that the ovenbird does not reorganizes but it is a kind of a gravity is not right is not incorrect. sent5: that the ovenbird does not reorganize and is a kind of a gravity does not hold. sent6: if the axon is lean thing that does not abjure demonstrability it is not papery. sent7: the fact that the anus is not non-empyrean but a metacarpal is false if there is something such that it is not papery. sent8: the blowtorch is not a metacarpal if the ovenbird is a oxidation-reduction. sent9: if the fact that something does reorganize hold then the fact that it does not oversleep and is a oxidation-reduction is not right. sent10: if the fact that something is empyrean and it is a metacarpal is incorrect then it is not metacarpal. sent11: that the ovenbird does not oversleep and is a kind of a oxidation-reduction is not correct. sent12: the fact that something does not reorganize and is not a metacarpal is wrong if it oversleeps. sent13: if the fact that something is bibliotic and it is a gravity is not right then the fact that the fact that it is not bibliotic is not correct is right. sent14: if the ministry does not preserve Brobdingnag the fact that it reorganizes and is a kind of a SL is incorrect. sent15: if something reorganizes that it does not oversleep and is not a oxidation-reduction is not right. sent16: that something is not staccato and not a loofah is not right if the fact that it reorganizes is true. sent17: that the blowtorch is not a kind of a gravity is not false if there exists something such that that it does reorganize and is a kind of a SL is wrong. sent18: that that the musher is a kind of a metacarpal and it is a gravity is incorrect is true. sent19: the fact that the musher is not a metacarpal and it is not bibliotic is incorrect if the blowtorch is not metacarpal. sent20: the ministry does not preserve Brobdingnag. sent21: that the ovenbird is not a oxidation-reduction and it is not bibliotic is incorrect if the musher is not a oxidation-reduction. sent22: the blowtorch is not a metacarpal if the fact that the ovenbird does not oversleep and is not a oxidation-reduction does not hold. sent23: the axon leans and does not abjure demonstrability if the Carmelite is not tasty. sent24: the musher is not a metacarpal if the fact that the anus is not metacarpal is right.
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the ovenbird does not oversleep and is not a oxidation-reduction is false if it does reorganize.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the ovenbird does reorganize.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ovenbird does not oversleep and it is not a kind of a oxidation-reduction does not hold.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the blowtorch is not metacarpal.; int4 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
that the blowtorch is not staccato and it is not a loofah is wrong.
sent16 -> int5: that the blowtorch is a kind of non-staccato thing that is not a kind of a loofah is false if it reorganizes.;
$hypothesis$ = the musher is not metacarpal and is not bibliotic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ovenbird does not reorganize the fact that that the blowtorch does not reorganize and is non-metacarpal is correct is false. sent2: the Carmelite is not tasty. sent3: if the ovenbird is not non-metacarpal then that it does not reorganize and it is bibliotic is not right. sent4: the fact that the ovenbird reorganizes if that the ovenbird does not reorganizes but it is a kind of a gravity is not right is not incorrect. sent5: that the ovenbird does not reorganize and is a kind of a gravity does not hold. sent6: if the axon is lean thing that does not abjure demonstrability it is not papery. sent7: the fact that the anus is not non-empyrean but a metacarpal is false if there is something such that it is not papery. sent8: the blowtorch is not a metacarpal if the ovenbird is a oxidation-reduction. sent9: if the fact that something does reorganize hold then the fact that it does not oversleep and is a oxidation-reduction is not right. sent10: if the fact that something is empyrean and it is a metacarpal is incorrect then it is not metacarpal. sent11: that the ovenbird does not oversleep and is a kind of a oxidation-reduction is not correct. sent12: the fact that something does not reorganize and is not a metacarpal is wrong if it oversleeps. sent13: if the fact that something is bibliotic and it is a gravity is not right then the fact that the fact that it is not bibliotic is not correct is right. sent14: if the ministry does not preserve Brobdingnag the fact that it reorganizes and is a kind of a SL is incorrect. sent15: if something reorganizes that it does not oversleep and is not a oxidation-reduction is not right. sent16: that something is not staccato and not a loofah is not right if the fact that it reorganizes is true. sent17: that the blowtorch is not a kind of a gravity is not false if there exists something such that that it does reorganize and is a kind of a SL is wrong. sent18: that that the musher is a kind of a metacarpal and it is a gravity is incorrect is true. sent19: the fact that the musher is not a metacarpal and it is not bibliotic is incorrect if the blowtorch is not metacarpal. sent20: the ministry does not preserve Brobdingnag. sent21: that the ovenbird is not a oxidation-reduction and it is not bibliotic is incorrect if the musher is not a oxidation-reduction. sent22: the blowtorch is not a metacarpal if the fact that the ovenbird does not oversleep and is not a oxidation-reduction does not hold. sent23: the axon leans and does not abjure demonstrability if the Carmelite is not tasty. sent24: the musher is not a metacarpal if the fact that the anus is not metacarpal is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the ovenbird does not oversleep and is not a oxidation-reduction is false if it does reorganize.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the ovenbird does reorganize.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ovenbird does not oversleep and it is not a kind of a oxidation-reduction does not hold.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the blowtorch is not metacarpal.; int4 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__