the fact that the racialness occurs and the karaoke does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: if that the fact that not the rewriting potential but the custody happens is incorrect is not wrong the custody does not occur. sent2: the fact that the capture occurs is not false. sent3: the fact that both the non-heterodactylness and the rewriting penetrability happens does not hold. sent4: either the withdrawal occurs or the heterodactylness does not occur or both. sent5: the Uniateness does not occur. sent6: if either the counterpointing Ping occurs or the by-product does not occur or both the thoughtfulness does not occur. sent7: if that both the lining and the micaceousness occurs does not hold then that the phototherapy does not occur is correct. sent8: that not the phototherapy but the micaceousness occurs is false if the rewriting potential occurs. sent9: the jejunostomy does not occur. sent10: if the mud happens the fact that the rewriting potential does not occur and the custody happens does not hold. sent11: the mudding and/or the rewriting potential happens. sent12: if the lining does not occur then that the racialness and the karaoke occurs does not hold. sent13: if the micaceousness does not occur the lining does not occur. sent14: that the lining and the micaceousness happens does not hold if the racialness does not occur. sent15: the fact that the lining does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the phototherapy does not occur but the micaceousness occurs is not right. sent16: that the racialness happens and the karaoke occurs is wrong. sent17: not the jejunostomy but the capitalist occurs. sent18: the capitalistness does not occur if either the mud occurs or the rewriting potential does not occur or both. sent19: if the lining does not occur the fact that the racialness but not the karaoke occurs does not hold. sent20: the fact that the non-dysphoricness and the ergoticness happens is not correct if the Tuscanness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rewriting potential does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the mudding occurs and/or the rewriting potential does not occur.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the capitalistness does not occur.; sent17 -> int3: the capitalistness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the rewriting potential happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that that the phototherapy does not occur and the micaceousness occurs is not wrong does not hold.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the lining does not occur.; int7 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the custody does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the racialness occurs and the karaoke does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the fact that not the rewriting potential but the custody happens is incorrect is not wrong the custody does not occur. sent2: the fact that the capture occurs is not false. sent3: the fact that both the non-heterodactylness and the rewriting penetrability happens does not hold. sent4: either the withdrawal occurs or the heterodactylness does not occur or both. sent5: the Uniateness does not occur. sent6: if either the counterpointing Ping occurs or the by-product does not occur or both the thoughtfulness does not occur. sent7: if that both the lining and the micaceousness occurs does not hold then that the phototherapy does not occur is correct. sent8: that not the phototherapy but the micaceousness occurs is false if the rewriting potential occurs. sent9: the jejunostomy does not occur. sent10: if the mud happens the fact that the rewriting potential does not occur and the custody happens does not hold. sent11: the mudding and/or the rewriting potential happens. sent12: if the lining does not occur then that the racialness and the karaoke occurs does not hold. sent13: if the micaceousness does not occur the lining does not occur. sent14: that the lining and the micaceousness happens does not hold if the racialness does not occur. sent15: the fact that the lining does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the phototherapy does not occur but the micaceousness occurs is not right. sent16: that the racialness happens and the karaoke occurs is wrong. sent17: not the jejunostomy but the capitalist occurs. sent18: the capitalistness does not occur if either the mud occurs or the rewriting potential does not occur or both. sent19: if the lining does not occur the fact that the racialness but not the karaoke occurs does not hold. sent20: the fact that the non-dysphoricness and the ergoticness happens is not correct if the Tuscanness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rewriting potential does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the mudding occurs and/or the rewriting potential does not occur.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the capitalistness does not occur.; sent17 -> int3: the capitalistness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the rewriting potential happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that that the phototherapy does not occur and the micaceousness occurs is not wrong does not hold.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the lining does not occur.; int7 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__