the fact that the planetesimal does finalize rani but it is not lovable is not correct.
sent1: if the ethnarch is not a multiple then the thill is a kind of multiple thing that finalizes ethnarch. sent2: the peridium is lovable if the I-beam does criticize dunghill. sent3: something that is non-multiple thing that finalizes ethnarch is a thermograph. sent4: if the rangpur does not criticize sleuth the ethnarch is not belemnitic and it is not a Butler. sent5: the rangpur does not criticize sleuth if there exists something such that it does not fail and/or it is a workbasket. sent6: the planetesimal does finalize rani and is not lovable if the peridium is lovable. sent7: something is both not a Butler and unaware if it does not criticize sleuth. sent8: there is something such that either it does not fail or it is a kind of a workbasket or both. sent9: the I-beam criticizes dunghill if the thill is a thermograph. sent10: something that is non-belemnitic thing that is not a Butler is not a kind of a multiple.
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the rangpur does not criticize sleuth.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ethnarch is not belemnitic and it is not a Butler.; sent10 -> int3: if the ethnarch is not belemnitic and it is not a kind of a Butler then it is non-multiple.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ethnarch is not a multiple.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: that the thill is not a multiple but it does finalize ethnarch is right.; sent3 -> int6: if the thill is a kind of non-multiple thing that does finalize ethnarch it is a thermograph.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the thill is a kind of a thermograph.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the I-beam does criticize dunghill.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the peridium is lovable.; int9 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the sawyer is not a Butler but unaware.
sent7 -> int10: the sawyer is not a kind of a Butler and is unaware if it does not criticize sleuth.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the planetesimal does finalize rani but it is not lovable is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ethnarch is not a multiple then the thill is a kind of multiple thing that finalizes ethnarch. sent2: the peridium is lovable if the I-beam does criticize dunghill. sent3: something that is non-multiple thing that finalizes ethnarch is a thermograph. sent4: if the rangpur does not criticize sleuth the ethnarch is not belemnitic and it is not a Butler. sent5: the rangpur does not criticize sleuth if there exists something such that it does not fail and/or it is a workbasket. sent6: the planetesimal does finalize rani and is not lovable if the peridium is lovable. sent7: something is both not a Butler and unaware if it does not criticize sleuth. sent8: there is something such that either it does not fail or it is a kind of a workbasket or both. sent9: the I-beam criticizes dunghill if the thill is a thermograph. sent10: something that is non-belemnitic thing that is not a Butler is not a kind of a multiple. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the rangpur does not criticize sleuth.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ethnarch is not belemnitic and it is not a Butler.; sent10 -> int3: if the ethnarch is not belemnitic and it is not a kind of a Butler then it is non-multiple.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ethnarch is not a multiple.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: that the thill is not a multiple but it does finalize ethnarch is right.; sent3 -> int6: if the thill is a kind of non-multiple thing that does finalize ethnarch it is a thermograph.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the thill is a kind of a thermograph.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the I-beam does criticize dunghill.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the peridium is lovable.; int9 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__