that the fact that the sorter does culture and it accepts calk is incorrect if the apparatus is not a kind of a gutsiness is false.
sent1: that the apparatus is not episcopal is not false if the fact that the psilophyton amerces ignorance and it is a frightfulness is not incorrect. sent2: the psilophyton does not accept calk. sent3: the sorter does culture and it accepts calk if the apparatus is not a gutsiness. sent4: the fact that the sorter is a culture and it accepts calk is not right if the apparatus does not breakfast morphine. sent5: the apparatus does not breakfast morphine if it is tight but not episcopal. sent6: the psilophyton does amerce ignorance. sent7: the psilophyton amerces ignorance and is a frightfulness. sent8: the psilophyton does accept calk and/or it does not breakfast morphine. sent9: something is tight if it is not a gutsiness.
sent9 -> int1: if the apparatus is not a kind of a gutsiness it is tight.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apparatus is not a gutsiness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the apparatus is tight is correct.; sent1 & sent7 -> int3: the apparatus is not episcopal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the apparatus is not non-tight but it is not episcopal.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the apparatus does not breakfast morphine.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the sorter is a culture and it accepts calk does not hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the foil is not a gutsiness.
sent8 -> int7: that something does accept calk and/or it does not breakfast morphine is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the sorter does culture and it accepts calk is incorrect if the apparatus is not a kind of a gutsiness is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the apparatus is not episcopal is not false if the fact that the psilophyton amerces ignorance and it is a frightfulness is not incorrect. sent2: the psilophyton does not accept calk. sent3: the sorter does culture and it accepts calk if the apparatus is not a gutsiness. sent4: the fact that the sorter is a culture and it accepts calk is not right if the apparatus does not breakfast morphine. sent5: the apparatus does not breakfast morphine if it is tight but not episcopal. sent6: the psilophyton does amerce ignorance. sent7: the psilophyton amerces ignorance and is a frightfulness. sent8: the psilophyton does accept calk and/or it does not breakfast morphine. sent9: something is tight if it is not a gutsiness. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the apparatus is not a kind of a gutsiness it is tight.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apparatus is not a gutsiness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the apparatus is tight is correct.; sent1 & sent7 -> int3: the apparatus is not episcopal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the apparatus is not non-tight but it is not episcopal.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the apparatus does not breakfast morphine.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the sorter is a culture and it accepts calk does not hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__