the fact that the concerting does not occur and the bearing Xenorhyncus does not occur is not right.
sent1: that the layering does not occur causes that the Philistine occurs and the wastefulness occurs. sent2: if the fact that both the unmaliciousness and the pointlessness happens does not hold then the channel does not occur. sent3: if the canonicness does not occur and the allies does not occur then the unshodness does not occur. sent4: the pulling happens and the endocentricness happens if the unshodness does not occur. sent5: the non-infantileness is caused by that both the wastefulness and the layer occurs. sent6: the citricness does not occur. sent7: if the wastefulness does not occur and the toleration occurs the concerting does not occur. sent8: that the maliciousness does not occur but the pointlessness occurs does not hold if the pull happens. sent9: if the interlocutoriness happens the superscribing buskin happens. sent10: the salient does not occur if not the bearing Sherman but the parameter happens. sent11: the herbivorousness does not occur and the bearing Xenorhyncus does not occur if the superscribing buskin happens. sent12: the layer happens. sent13: the Methodist happens and the interlocutoriness happens if the channel does not occur. sent14: the toleration occurs if the fact that the herbivorousness but not the toleration happens does not hold. sent15: the bearing Xenorhyncus does not occur. sent16: the concerting occurs if the herbivorousness does not occur and the bearing Xenorhyncus does not occur. sent17: the infantileness occurs. sent18: that the herbivorousness but not the toleration happens is not correct. sent19: the bearing supererogation occurs and the thronging happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wastefulness occurs.; assump1 & sent12 -> int1: both the wastefulness and the layering occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the infantileness does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wastefulness does not occur is right.; sent14 & sent18 -> int5: the toleration occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the wastefulness but the toleration happens.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the concerting does not occur.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the Philistine happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the concerting does not occur and the bearing Xenorhyncus does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the layering does not occur causes that the Philistine occurs and the wastefulness occurs. sent2: if the fact that both the unmaliciousness and the pointlessness happens does not hold then the channel does not occur. sent3: if the canonicness does not occur and the allies does not occur then the unshodness does not occur. sent4: the pulling happens and the endocentricness happens if the unshodness does not occur. sent5: the non-infantileness is caused by that both the wastefulness and the layer occurs. sent6: the citricness does not occur. sent7: if the wastefulness does not occur and the toleration occurs the concerting does not occur. sent8: that the maliciousness does not occur but the pointlessness occurs does not hold if the pull happens. sent9: if the interlocutoriness happens the superscribing buskin happens. sent10: the salient does not occur if not the bearing Sherman but the parameter happens. sent11: the herbivorousness does not occur and the bearing Xenorhyncus does not occur if the superscribing buskin happens. sent12: the layer happens. sent13: the Methodist happens and the interlocutoriness happens if the channel does not occur. sent14: the toleration occurs if the fact that the herbivorousness but not the toleration happens does not hold. sent15: the bearing Xenorhyncus does not occur. sent16: the concerting occurs if the herbivorousness does not occur and the bearing Xenorhyncus does not occur. sent17: the infantileness occurs. sent18: that the herbivorousness but not the toleration happens is not correct. sent19: the bearing supererogation occurs and the thronging happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wastefulness occurs.; assump1 & sent12 -> int1: both the wastefulness and the layering occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the infantileness does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wastefulness does not occur is right.; sent14 & sent18 -> int5: the toleration occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the wastefulness but the toleration happens.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the concerting does not occur.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__