there exists something such that that it does not contribute toothpick and is a Kannada is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the ritz is not a parachute and is a hieratic is incorrect if something is philosophic. sent2: there exists something such that it is unequivocal. sent3: if that there is something such that that it is a Kingstown and it is not a Kannada is not true hold then the lithosphere is a Kannada. sent4: there exists something such that that the fact that it contributes toothpick and it is a Kannada is correct is not true. sent5: if there exists something such that it typesets that the citizen is not a Shylock and is a valetudinarian is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is not cytogenetic and is an ally is false. sent7: that the leaf-roller contributes toothpick and it is a Kannada does not hold. sent8: something is basaltic. sent9: the fact that the leaf-roller is not a Kannada but it is unostentatious does not hold. sent10: that the leaf-roller constipates and is bacchantic is false if there is something such that it contributes toothpick. sent11: something does not contribute toothpick but it is a kind of a Kannada. sent12: the fact that something is a kind of a shorts hold. sent13: there is something such that it is a valetudinarian. sent14: that the paperknife is a Kingstown but it is not a Kannada is wrong. sent15: the fact that the leaf-roller does contribute toothpick and it is a Kannada is incorrect if there are valetudinarian things. sent16: something is a quail. sent17: if there is something such that it is a Kannada then the fact that the leaf-roller is not a kind of an ally but it does set leaf-roller is incorrect.
there is something such that it is a replica.
sent14 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a Kingstown and is not a Kannada is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the lithosphere is a Kannada.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does not contribute toothpick and is a Kannada is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ritz is not a parachute and is a hieratic is incorrect if something is philosophic. sent2: there exists something such that it is unequivocal. sent3: if that there is something such that that it is a Kingstown and it is not a Kannada is not true hold then the lithosphere is a Kannada. sent4: there exists something such that that the fact that it contributes toothpick and it is a Kannada is correct is not true. sent5: if there exists something such that it typesets that the citizen is not a Shylock and is a valetudinarian is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is not cytogenetic and is an ally is false. sent7: that the leaf-roller contributes toothpick and it is a Kannada does not hold. sent8: something is basaltic. sent9: the fact that the leaf-roller is not a Kannada but it is unostentatious does not hold. sent10: that the leaf-roller constipates and is bacchantic is false if there is something such that it contributes toothpick. sent11: something does not contribute toothpick but it is a kind of a Kannada. sent12: the fact that something is a kind of a shorts hold. sent13: there is something such that it is a valetudinarian. sent14: that the paperknife is a Kingstown but it is not a Kannada is wrong. sent15: the fact that the leaf-roller does contribute toothpick and it is a Kannada is incorrect if there are valetudinarian things. sent16: something is a quail. sent17: if there is something such that it is a Kannada then the fact that the leaf-roller is not a kind of an ally but it does set leaf-roller is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__