the fact that there is something such that if it is not cementitious the fact that it is an electromagnetism and/or it does illuminate does not hold is not right.
sent1: the fact that the plunderer is a kind of an electromagnetism and/or does illuminate is incorrect if it is cementitious. sent2: the fact that the plunderer is an electromagnetism or it does illuminate or both is false if it is not cementitious. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a mid-water then it is not sociolinguistics. sent4: there is something such that if it is not anaphoric it is not ichorous.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not cementitious the fact that it is an electromagnetism and/or it does illuminate does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the plunderer is a kind of an electromagnetism and/or does illuminate is incorrect if it is cementitious. sent2: the fact that the plunderer is an electromagnetism or it does illuminate or both is false if it is not cementitious. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a mid-water then it is not sociolinguistics. sent4: there is something such that if it is not anaphoric it is not ichorous. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__