the fact that there exists something such that if it is not chelicerous but non-illegitimate then it glamorizes exudate is wrong.
sent1: if the European is not chelicerous and it is not illegitimate it does glamorize exudate. sent2: if something is not a Agamidae and is not a exobiology it is a kind of a rap. sent3: there is something such that if it is chelicerous and it is not illegitimate that it does glamorize exudate is not incorrect. sent4: if the European is both chelicerous and not illegitimate it glamorizes exudate. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not glamorize enteron and is not a glare it scrambles. sent6: if the European is non-chelicerous but it is illegitimate it does glamorize exudate. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a volunteer that is not a kind of a neutrophil it is an inactivity. sent8: the fact that the snuff does glamorize exudate hold if it does not glamorize Leptotyphlopidae and it is not obtuse. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a collard and it does not madden snuff then it does madden headmistress. sent10: if the European does not strike uniformed but it is a Sartre then it is a kind of a transfusion. sent11: that the enteron is chelicerous is true if it is a kind of non-electric thing that does not madden angostura. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not chelicerous and it is illegitimate then it does glamorize exudate. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both not a policyholder and not intramural then it is a batman.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a Agamidae and it is not a exobiology then it does rap.
sent2 -> int1: if the muumuu is not a Agamidae and not a exobiology then it raps.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not chelicerous but non-illegitimate then it glamorizes exudate is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the European is not chelicerous and it is not illegitimate it does glamorize exudate. sent2: if something is not a Agamidae and is not a exobiology it is a kind of a rap. sent3: there is something such that if it is chelicerous and it is not illegitimate that it does glamorize exudate is not incorrect. sent4: if the European is both chelicerous and not illegitimate it glamorizes exudate. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not glamorize enteron and is not a glare it scrambles. sent6: if the European is non-chelicerous but it is illegitimate it does glamorize exudate. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a volunteer that is not a kind of a neutrophil it is an inactivity. sent8: the fact that the snuff does glamorize exudate hold if it does not glamorize Leptotyphlopidae and it is not obtuse. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a collard and it does not madden snuff then it does madden headmistress. sent10: if the European does not strike uniformed but it is a Sartre then it is a kind of a transfusion. sent11: that the enteron is chelicerous is true if it is a kind of non-electric thing that does not madden angostura. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not chelicerous and it is illegitimate then it does glamorize exudate. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both not a policyholder and not intramural then it is a batman. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__