the fact that there exists something such that if it is a rallying then it is not unicameral is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a thyroxine the fact that it does not guggle mocking is right. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a rallying it is unicameral. sent3: if the fact that the plenum does rally is not false then it is not a kind of a wave. sent4: the activity is unicameral if it is a kind of a chlorofluorocarbon. sent5: if the disguise is a rallying it is unicameral. sent6: if something is a catalectic then it is not unicameral. sent7: that there exists something such that if it shallows then it is not a powwow is not wrong. sent8: the disguise is not a kind of a marbles if it does rally. sent9: if the disguise does rally it is not unicameral.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
if the salol is a catalectic it is not unicameral.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a rallying then it is not unicameral is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a thyroxine the fact that it does not guggle mocking is right. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a rallying it is unicameral. sent3: if the fact that the plenum does rally is not false then it is not a kind of a wave. sent4: the activity is unicameral if it is a kind of a chlorofluorocarbon. sent5: if the disguise is a rallying it is unicameral. sent6: if something is a catalectic then it is not unicameral. sent7: that there exists something such that if it shallows then it is not a powwow is not wrong. sent8: the disguise is not a kind of a marbles if it does rally. sent9: if the disguise does rally it is not unicameral. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__