the applejack is not gnostic.
sent1: if the fact that the footing is not sarcolemmic but it is a anaplasty is false it is not canicular. sent2: the execution is a scratch. sent3: the applejack is gnostic if that the footing is not leafless hold. sent4: the footing is not leafless if that either it is canicular or it is sarcolemmic or both does not hold. sent5: if that the menstruation does not loom footing but it is gnostic is not correct then it is not canicular. sent6: something is not leafless if the fact that it is canicular or it is not sarcolemmic or both is incorrect. sent7: if something is not a kind of a anaplasty then it is non-sarcolemmic. sent8: something that does not loom menstruation is not sarcolemmic. sent9: The menstruation does not loom execution. sent10: if that something is canicular and/or sarcolemmic is false then it is not leafless. sent11: if the fact that the execution is either not canicular or leafy or both is wrong then the applejack is leafy. sent12: if the fact that something is not sarcolemmic and it does not loom menstruation does not hold it is not gnostic. sent13: the execution does not loom footing. sent14: if the execution does not loom menstruation then the fact that the menstruation does not loom footing and is a kind of a anaplasty is not correct. sent15: something is not canicular if that it does loom menstruation and/or it is not leafless does not hold. sent16: the supernatant does not loom menstruation. sent17: the execution does not loom menstruation. sent18: if that the footing is a kind of a anaplasty and/or does loom menstruation is not correct then it is not sarcolemmic. sent19: if that something does not loom footing but it is a kind of a anaplasty is not right it is not sarcolemmic. sent20: the fact that something is non-sarcolemmic thing that does not loom menstruation is not correct if it is leafless. sent21: if that the menstruation looms footing and/or is not canicular is not correct it is not sarcolemmic. sent22: the fact that the footing is canicular and/or it is not sarcolemmic is not right if the menstruation is not sarcolemmic. sent23: that either the menstruation is a anaplasty or it is not canicular or both does not hold if that the footing is not canicular is right.
sent14 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that the menstruation does not loom footing but it is a anaplasty is not right.; sent19 -> int2: the fact that if the fact that the menstruation does not loom footing and is the anaplasty is incorrect then the fact that the menstruation is not sarcolemmic is not wrong hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the menstruation is non-sarcolemmic is correct.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: that the footing is canicular and/or is not sarcolemmic does not hold.; sent6 -> int5: if that the footing is canicular and/or it is non-sarcolemmic is not right then it is not leafless.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the footing is not leafless.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the applejack is not gnostic.
sent12 -> int7: that the applejack is not gnostic is not false if that it is a kind of non-sarcolemmic thing that does not loom menstruation is not right.; sent20 -> int8: that the applejack is not sarcolemmic and does not loom menstruation is incorrect if it is not leafy.;
$hypothesis$ = the applejack is not gnostic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the footing is not sarcolemmic but it is a anaplasty is false it is not canicular. sent2: the execution is a scratch. sent3: the applejack is gnostic if that the footing is not leafless hold. sent4: the footing is not leafless if that either it is canicular or it is sarcolemmic or both does not hold. sent5: if that the menstruation does not loom footing but it is gnostic is not correct then it is not canicular. sent6: something is not leafless if the fact that it is canicular or it is not sarcolemmic or both is incorrect. sent7: if something is not a kind of a anaplasty then it is non-sarcolemmic. sent8: something that does not loom menstruation is not sarcolemmic. sent9: The menstruation does not loom execution. sent10: if that something is canicular and/or sarcolemmic is false then it is not leafless. sent11: if the fact that the execution is either not canicular or leafy or both is wrong then the applejack is leafy. sent12: if the fact that something is not sarcolemmic and it does not loom menstruation does not hold it is not gnostic. sent13: the execution does not loom footing. sent14: if the execution does not loom menstruation then the fact that the menstruation does not loom footing and is a kind of a anaplasty is not correct. sent15: something is not canicular if that it does loom menstruation and/or it is not leafless does not hold. sent16: the supernatant does not loom menstruation. sent17: the execution does not loom menstruation. sent18: if that the footing is a kind of a anaplasty and/or does loom menstruation is not correct then it is not sarcolemmic. sent19: if that something does not loom footing but it is a kind of a anaplasty is not right it is not sarcolemmic. sent20: the fact that something is non-sarcolemmic thing that does not loom menstruation is not correct if it is leafless. sent21: if that the menstruation looms footing and/or is not canicular is not correct it is not sarcolemmic. sent22: the fact that the footing is canicular and/or it is not sarcolemmic is not right if the menstruation is not sarcolemmic. sent23: that either the menstruation is a anaplasty or it is not canicular or both does not hold if that the footing is not canicular is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that the menstruation does not loom footing but it is a anaplasty is not right.; sent19 -> int2: the fact that if the fact that the menstruation does not loom footing and is the anaplasty is incorrect then the fact that the menstruation is not sarcolemmic is not wrong hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the menstruation is non-sarcolemmic is correct.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: that the footing is canicular and/or is not sarcolemmic does not hold.; sent6 -> int5: if that the footing is canicular and/or it is non-sarcolemmic is not right then it is not leafless.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the footing is not leafless.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__