the occupancy does not occur and/or the curvet occurs.
sent1: if the Afghaniness occurs the implicationalness occurs. sent2: if the cannonading does not occur then the decorousness and the non-spatiotemporalness occurs. sent3: the mushroom and/or the metalwork happens if the celebratoriness does not occur. sent4: if the mushroom happens then the posting occurs. sent5: if the bustle does not occur that that the pavage does not occur and/or the continuing happens does not hold is true. sent6: if the chaetognathanness does not occur then the implicationalness does not occur. sent7: the diamagneticness happens if the fact that the pavage does not occur or the continuing happens or both is false. sent8: that if the spatiotemporalness does not occur then that either the occupancy does not occur or the curveting happens or both is not true is right. sent9: the fact that the Afghaniness does not occur but the diamagneticness occurs is false if the acinarness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the chaetognathanness does not occur is right if the spatiotemporalness happens and the bustle happens. sent11: the celebratoriness does not occur. sent12: if the posting happens that the careerism does not occur but the ceilidh happens does not hold. sent13: if the pavage does not occur the chaetognathanness and the implicationalness happens. sent14: both the spatiotemporalness and the cannonading happens. sent15: if that not the careerism but the ceilidh happens is not true then that the acinarness does not occur is correct. sent16: that the implicationalness and the chaetognathanness happens is caused by that the pavage does not occur. sent17: the Afghaniness happens.
sent14 -> int1: the spatiotemporalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bustling occurs hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the spatiotemporalness occurs and the bustle happens.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the chaetognathanness does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the implicationalness does not occur is not wrong.; sent1 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the implicationalness occurs is true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the bustling does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: that the pavage does not occur or the continuing occurs or both is incorrect.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the diamagneticness occurs.;
the indelicateness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the occupancy does not occur and/or the curvet occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Afghaniness occurs the implicationalness occurs. sent2: if the cannonading does not occur then the decorousness and the non-spatiotemporalness occurs. sent3: the mushroom and/or the metalwork happens if the celebratoriness does not occur. sent4: if the mushroom happens then the posting occurs. sent5: if the bustle does not occur that that the pavage does not occur and/or the continuing happens does not hold is true. sent6: if the chaetognathanness does not occur then the implicationalness does not occur. sent7: the diamagneticness happens if the fact that the pavage does not occur or the continuing happens or both is false. sent8: that if the spatiotemporalness does not occur then that either the occupancy does not occur or the curveting happens or both is not true is right. sent9: the fact that the Afghaniness does not occur but the diamagneticness occurs is false if the acinarness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the chaetognathanness does not occur is right if the spatiotemporalness happens and the bustle happens. sent11: the celebratoriness does not occur. sent12: if the posting happens that the careerism does not occur but the ceilidh happens does not hold. sent13: if the pavage does not occur the chaetognathanness and the implicationalness happens. sent14: both the spatiotemporalness and the cannonading happens. sent15: if that not the careerism but the ceilidh happens is not true then that the acinarness does not occur is correct. sent16: that the implicationalness and the chaetognathanness happens is caused by that the pavage does not occur. sent17: the Afghaniness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the spatiotemporalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bustling occurs hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the spatiotemporalness occurs and the bustle happens.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the chaetognathanness does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the implicationalness does not occur is not wrong.; sent1 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the implicationalness occurs is true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the bustling does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: that the pavage does not occur or the continuing occurs or both is incorrect.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the diamagneticness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__