the triquetral is not a Damascene.
sent1: that the coke is not a kind of a monoplane and is not a liquidity does not hold if the thymosin is low-level. sent2: the bryophyte is not a monoplane but perinasal if the coke is perinasal. sent3: the outcast is a Polish. sent4: the triquetral is not a Polish but it is perinasal if the coke is perinasal. sent5: the triquetral is not a Damascene if the CRT is not a kind of a Damascene. sent6: something is a kind of a counterespionage if it does not unscramble and it is perinasal. sent7: the triquetral is perinasal if the fact that the bryophyte is perinasal is not incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the thymosin is low-level is not false then that the fact that the coke is a kind of a monoplane but it is not a kind of a liquidity hold is false. sent9: if that the bryophyte is perinasal hold then that the triquetral does not unscramble but it is not perinasal hold. sent10: something is Polish if it is a monoplane. sent11: the CRT is not a Damascene if the thymosin is either non-hydrokinetic or not a Damascene or both. sent12: if the coke is a Polish the bryophyte is perinasal. sent13: if the bryophyte is low-level the fact that the coke is a monoplane but it is not apiarian is wrong. sent14: the creel is not a estriol but it is unacceptable. sent15: the coke is perinasal if the triquetral is a counterespionage. sent16: the thymosin is a monoplane. sent17: if the coke is a kind of a monoplane it is Polish. sent18: the thymosin is low-level if the CRT is apiarian. sent19: if that something is a monoplane but it is not apiarian is incorrect it is apiarian. sent20: the bryophyte is low-level if it is a liquidity. sent21: the CRT is apiarian and it is hydrokinetic. sent22: the CRT is a Damascene. sent23: something is a Polish if that the fact that it is not a kind of a monoplane and it is not a liquidity is not wrong is not true. sent24: the triquetral is perinasal. sent25: the fact that the coke is a kind of a monoplane but it is not a kind of a liquidity does not hold. sent26: the CRT is hydrokinetic. sent27: something is a kind of a Damascene if it is a counterespionage.
sent21 -> int1: the CRT is apiarian.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the thymosin is low-level.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the coke is not a kind of a monoplane and is not a liquidity is incorrect.; sent23 -> int4: if the fact that the coke is not a monoplane and is not a kind of a liquidity is wrong then it is a kind of a Polish.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the coke is a Polish.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the bryophyte is perinasal.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the triquetral does not unscramble but it is perinasal.; sent6 -> int8: the triquetral is a counterespionage if it does not unscramble and is not non-perinasal.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the triquetral is a kind of a counterespionage.; sent27 -> int10: that the triquetral is a Damascene is right if it is a counterespionage.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the triquetral is not a kind of a Damascene.
sent19 -> int11: if that the coke is a kind of a monoplane and is not apiarian does not hold it is apiarian.;
$hypothesis$ = the triquetral is not a Damascene. ; $context$ = sent1: that the coke is not a kind of a monoplane and is not a liquidity does not hold if the thymosin is low-level. sent2: the bryophyte is not a monoplane but perinasal if the coke is perinasal. sent3: the outcast is a Polish. sent4: the triquetral is not a Polish but it is perinasal if the coke is perinasal. sent5: the triquetral is not a Damascene if the CRT is not a kind of a Damascene. sent6: something is a kind of a counterespionage if it does not unscramble and it is perinasal. sent7: the triquetral is perinasal if the fact that the bryophyte is perinasal is not incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the thymosin is low-level is not false then that the fact that the coke is a kind of a monoplane but it is not a kind of a liquidity hold is false. sent9: if that the bryophyte is perinasal hold then that the triquetral does not unscramble but it is not perinasal hold. sent10: something is Polish if it is a monoplane. sent11: the CRT is not a Damascene if the thymosin is either non-hydrokinetic or not a Damascene or both. sent12: if the coke is a Polish the bryophyte is perinasal. sent13: if the bryophyte is low-level the fact that the coke is a monoplane but it is not apiarian is wrong. sent14: the creel is not a estriol but it is unacceptable. sent15: the coke is perinasal if the triquetral is a counterespionage. sent16: the thymosin is a monoplane. sent17: if the coke is a kind of a monoplane it is Polish. sent18: the thymosin is low-level if the CRT is apiarian. sent19: if that something is a monoplane but it is not apiarian is incorrect it is apiarian. sent20: the bryophyte is low-level if it is a liquidity. sent21: the CRT is apiarian and it is hydrokinetic. sent22: the CRT is a Damascene. sent23: something is a Polish if that the fact that it is not a kind of a monoplane and it is not a liquidity is not wrong is not true. sent24: the triquetral is perinasal. sent25: the fact that the coke is a kind of a monoplane but it is not a kind of a liquidity does not hold. sent26: the CRT is hydrokinetic. sent27: something is a kind of a Damascene if it is a counterespionage. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: the CRT is apiarian.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the thymosin is low-level.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the coke is not a kind of a monoplane and is not a liquidity is incorrect.; sent23 -> int4: if the fact that the coke is not a monoplane and is not a kind of a liquidity is wrong then it is a kind of a Polish.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the coke is a Polish.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the bryophyte is perinasal.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the triquetral does not unscramble but it is perinasal.; sent6 -> int8: the triquetral is a counterespionage if it does not unscramble and is not non-perinasal.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the triquetral is a kind of a counterespionage.; sent27 -> int10: that the triquetral is a Damascene is right if it is a counterespionage.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__