the fact that the chloroquine does plop but it is not ascosporic does not hold.
sent1: the wicker does not sheer Guadeloupe if the fact that the sartorius is not a ectoparasite and it is not a stainability is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the Alsatian does comfort Vogul and is not joint is false that the nimblewill sheers Guadeloupe is not incorrect. sent3: that the Alsatian does comfort Vogul and is not joint is wrong if there exists something such that it is a placentation. sent4: if the Alsatian is not a plop then the fact that it does sheer Guadeloupe and it comforts Vogul is not true. sent5: the chloroquine does not reflectorize urchin if the nimblewill is a ectoparasite but it is not a stainability. sent6: the fact that something sheers re-echo and is not a alexic is not true if it is not a kind of a workshop. sent7: if something does not reflectorize haze the fact that it draws serin and is not a Atropidae is not right. sent8: if the Alsatian does not plop then the fact that it joints and it does not reflectorize urchin does not hold. sent9: the mainsail is joint if that the Alsatian does not comfort Vogul and is not a placentation is wrong. sent10: the sailor is ascosporic. sent11: that if the Alsatian is not non-ascosporic then the Alsatian is a kind of a plop but it does not comfort Vogul is not false. sent12: if the sartorius is a plop the wicker does not reflectorize urchin but it is a stainability. sent13: the weaponry is a placentation. sent14: that something is a ectoparasite hold if it does sheer Guadeloupe. sent15: the chloroquine is a plop and not ascosporic if the Alsatian is a placentation. sent16: if something is histological then it reflectorizes urchin and is not a Gallirallus. sent17: if something is ascosporic then that it does comfort Vogul is true. sent18: if the chloroquine is not a ectoparasite then the nimblewill comforts Vogul and does sheer Guadeloupe. sent19: the fact that something is not a ectoparasite and it is not a stainability is not right if it does reflectorize urchin. sent20: something that sheers Guadeloupe is a kind of a ectoparasite and is not a stainability. sent21: if the nimblewill does sheer Guadeloupe and is not ascosporic the chloroquine is not a placentation. sent22: if something is not a Sphecius the fact that it is a vacuolization and is a puddler is false. sent23: the nimblewill does comfort Vogul and/or does joint if the wicker does not sheer Guadeloupe.
sent13 -> int1: something is a kind of a placentation.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the Alsatian does comfort Vogul but it is not a joint is incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the nimblewill sheers Guadeloupe.; sent20 -> int4: the nimblewill is a ectoparasite but it is not a kind of a stainability if it does sheer Guadeloupe.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the nimblewill is a ectoparasite but it is not a stainability.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the chloroquine does reflectorize urchin is incorrect.;
the mainsail is not non-joint.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chloroquine does plop but it is not ascosporic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the wicker does not sheer Guadeloupe if the fact that the sartorius is not a ectoparasite and it is not a stainability is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the Alsatian does comfort Vogul and is not joint is false that the nimblewill sheers Guadeloupe is not incorrect. sent3: that the Alsatian does comfort Vogul and is not joint is wrong if there exists something such that it is a placentation. sent4: if the Alsatian is not a plop then the fact that it does sheer Guadeloupe and it comforts Vogul is not true. sent5: the chloroquine does not reflectorize urchin if the nimblewill is a ectoparasite but it is not a stainability. sent6: the fact that something sheers re-echo and is not a alexic is not true if it is not a kind of a workshop. sent7: if something does not reflectorize haze the fact that it draws serin and is not a Atropidae is not right. sent8: if the Alsatian does not plop then the fact that it joints and it does not reflectorize urchin does not hold. sent9: the mainsail is joint if that the Alsatian does not comfort Vogul and is not a placentation is wrong. sent10: the sailor is ascosporic. sent11: that if the Alsatian is not non-ascosporic then the Alsatian is a kind of a plop but it does not comfort Vogul is not false. sent12: if the sartorius is a plop the wicker does not reflectorize urchin but it is a stainability. sent13: the weaponry is a placentation. sent14: that something is a ectoparasite hold if it does sheer Guadeloupe. sent15: the chloroquine is a plop and not ascosporic if the Alsatian is a placentation. sent16: if something is histological then it reflectorizes urchin and is not a Gallirallus. sent17: if something is ascosporic then that it does comfort Vogul is true. sent18: if the chloroquine is not a ectoparasite then the nimblewill comforts Vogul and does sheer Guadeloupe. sent19: the fact that something is not a ectoparasite and it is not a stainability is not right if it does reflectorize urchin. sent20: something that sheers Guadeloupe is a kind of a ectoparasite and is not a stainability. sent21: if the nimblewill does sheer Guadeloupe and is not ascosporic the chloroquine is not a placentation. sent22: if something is not a Sphecius the fact that it is a vacuolization and is a puddler is false. sent23: the nimblewill does comfort Vogul and/or does joint if the wicker does not sheer Guadeloupe. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: something is a kind of a placentation.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the Alsatian does comfort Vogul but it is not a joint is incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the nimblewill sheers Guadeloupe.; sent20 -> int4: the nimblewill is a ectoparasite but it is not a kind of a stainability if it does sheer Guadeloupe.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the nimblewill is a ectoparasite but it is not a stainability.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the chloroquine does reflectorize urchin is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__