that the fact that the rocker is not a endodontist and does compromise hold is wrong.
sent1: the ceratosaur is uneasy. sent2: the Burberry is not a kind of a tank if the ceratosaur is a Browning and it is a past. sent3: the ceratosaur is not archegonial if it is not a endodontist and it is a tank. sent4: the Burberry is not a titfer if that it does not subtilize bentonite and it is not a perimysium is wrong. sent5: if the ceratosaur is a Browning but it is not a past the Burberry does not tank. sent6: if the fact that something is archegonial and not industrial is not true then it is industrial. sent7: if the Burberry is not a kind of a Browning the fact that that the ceratosaur is not a tank but it is a titfer is wrong is not incorrect. sent8: the fact that the Burberry does not subtilize bentonite and is not a perimysium is not correct. sent9: if the ceratosaur does not compromise it is not a endodontist but a tank. sent10: the ceratosaur is archegonial. sent11: if the Burberry does subtilize bentonite then the ceratosaur is a kind of a tank. sent12: the rocker is not past. sent13: the fact that the Burberry is archegonial but it is not a tank does not hold if it is not a titfer. sent14: if the Burberry is not archegonial that the rocker is not a kind of a endodontist but it is a compromise is wrong. sent15: if something is archegonial then it is not a endodontist and it does compromise. sent16: the ceratosaur is a Browning that is not past.
sent5 & sent16 -> int1: the Burberry does not tank.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Burberry is archegonial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Burberry is archegonial but it is not a tank.; sent4 & sent8 -> int3: the Burberry is not a titfer.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Burberry is archegonial but not a tank is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Burberry is not archegonial.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the Burberry is industrial.
sent6 -> int7: if that that the Burberry is archegonial but it is not industrial is not correct hold then it is industrial.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the rocker is not a endodontist and does compromise hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the ceratosaur is uneasy. sent2: the Burberry is not a kind of a tank if the ceratosaur is a Browning and it is a past. sent3: the ceratosaur is not archegonial if it is not a endodontist and it is a tank. sent4: the Burberry is not a titfer if that it does not subtilize bentonite and it is not a perimysium is wrong. sent5: if the ceratosaur is a Browning but it is not a past the Burberry does not tank. sent6: if the fact that something is archegonial and not industrial is not true then it is industrial. sent7: if the Burberry is not a kind of a Browning the fact that that the ceratosaur is not a tank but it is a titfer is wrong is not incorrect. sent8: the fact that the Burberry does not subtilize bentonite and is not a perimysium is not correct. sent9: if the ceratosaur does not compromise it is not a endodontist but a tank. sent10: the ceratosaur is archegonial. sent11: if the Burberry does subtilize bentonite then the ceratosaur is a kind of a tank. sent12: the rocker is not past. sent13: the fact that the Burberry is archegonial but it is not a tank does not hold if it is not a titfer. sent14: if the Burberry is not archegonial that the rocker is not a kind of a endodontist but it is a compromise is wrong. sent15: if something is archegonial then it is not a endodontist and it does compromise. sent16: the ceratosaur is a Browning that is not past. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent16 -> int1: the Burberry does not tank.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Burberry is archegonial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Burberry is archegonial but it is not a tank.; sent4 & sent8 -> int3: the Burberry is not a titfer.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Burberry is archegonial but not a tank is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Burberry is not archegonial.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__