the balaclava is not a tome.
sent1: if the balaclava is not a condensation it is a kind of a tome that does carjack ebony. sent2: that something segregates ESM and it is a screwup is not correct if it does not anastomose. sent3: the cookhouse does not anastomose if the eutectic does segregate ESM. sent4: the fact that the balaclava is a tome is not true if the fact that the eutectic segregates ESM and it is a kind of a screwup does not hold. sent5: if something is a kind of a condensation that does segregate Gershwin then it does not anastomose. sent6: the eutectic segregates ESM if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a screwup is correct. sent7: the cookhouse does not segregate Gershwin. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a screwup. sent9: the eutectic is a kind of a tome. sent10: the balaclava carjacks ebony. sent11: the pruno does segregate Gershwin. sent12: the fact that the balaclava is not a Charcot and is not a plastic is not incorrect. sent13: the eutectic is a condensation if the fact that the cookhouse is not a kind of a condensation but it is leprous is wrong. sent14: the eutectic does not carjack ebony. sent15: something is a condensation. sent16: The Gershwin does not segregate cookhouse. sent17: the balaclava is not a condensation if the cookhouse does not anastomose and does not segregate Gershwin. sent18: if the balaclava is not a kind of a condensation it does carjack ebony. sent19: the balaclava anastomoses if it is not a condensation.
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the eutectic does segregate ESM.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the cookhouse does not anastomose.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the cookhouse does not anastomose and it does not segregate Gershwin.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: that the balaclava is not a condensation is true.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the balaclava is a tome and it does carjack ebony.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the balaclava is not a tome.
sent2 -> int6: that the eutectic segregates ESM and is a screwup is incorrect if it does not anastomose.; sent5 -> int7: the eutectic does not anastomose if it is a condensation that does segregate Gershwin.;
$hypothesis$ = the balaclava is not a tome. ; $context$ = sent1: if the balaclava is not a condensation it is a kind of a tome that does carjack ebony. sent2: that something segregates ESM and it is a screwup is not correct if it does not anastomose. sent3: the cookhouse does not anastomose if the eutectic does segregate ESM. sent4: the fact that the balaclava is a tome is not true if the fact that the eutectic segregates ESM and it is a kind of a screwup does not hold. sent5: if something is a kind of a condensation that does segregate Gershwin then it does not anastomose. sent6: the eutectic segregates ESM if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a screwup is correct. sent7: the cookhouse does not segregate Gershwin. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a screwup. sent9: the eutectic is a kind of a tome. sent10: the balaclava carjacks ebony. sent11: the pruno does segregate Gershwin. sent12: the fact that the balaclava is not a Charcot and is not a plastic is not incorrect. sent13: the eutectic is a condensation if the fact that the cookhouse is not a kind of a condensation but it is leprous is wrong. sent14: the eutectic does not carjack ebony. sent15: something is a condensation. sent16: The Gershwin does not segregate cookhouse. sent17: the balaclava is not a condensation if the cookhouse does not anastomose and does not segregate Gershwin. sent18: if the balaclava is not a kind of a condensation it does carjack ebony. sent19: the balaclava anastomoses if it is not a condensation. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the eutectic does segregate ESM.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the cookhouse does not anastomose.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the cookhouse does not anastomose and it does not segregate Gershwin.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: that the balaclava is not a condensation is true.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the balaclava is a tome and it does carjack ebony.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__