the siding amputation happens.
sent1: the siding Desmodus but not the gleaming happens. sent2: if the thalloidness does not occur the fact that the study does not occur is right. sent3: if the refining Nobel does not occur the study and the thalloidness happens. sent4: the alluding does not occur. sent5: if that either the immunization does not occur or the siding self-service does not occur or both does not hold then that the panting does not occur is not false. sent6: the siding piperacillin does not occur if the fact that the refining domino does not occur and the pant occurs is not right. sent7: if the refining domino does not occur the fact that the pant does not occur and the alluding does not occur is not true. sent8: the refining Nobel does not occur. sent9: the fact that that either the immunization does not occur or the siding self-service does not occur or both is not right is correct. sent10: either the refining domino or that the siding piperacillin does not occur or both brings about that the siding piperacillin does not occur. sent11: the siding inquirer happens. sent12: the siding amputation does not occur if the studying occurs but the mobilization does not occur. sent13: if the panting happens then either the refining domino occurs or the siding piperacillin does not occur or both. sent14: that the refining stillness does not occur and/or the impeding coke does not occur is incorrect. sent15: the siding paintball does not occur and the precedence does not occur. sent16: that the refining domino does not occur is not false if either the mobilization or the siding piperacillin or both occurs. sent17: if the fact that not the siding piperacillin but the refining domino occurs does not hold the fact that the impeding sponge does not occur is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mobilization occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the mobilization happens and/or the siding piperacillin happens hold.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the refining domino does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the pant does not occur and the alluding does not occur is not correct.; sent5 & sent9 -> int4: the pant does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the panting does not occur and the alluding does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the mobilization does not occur.; sent3 & sent8 -> int8: the study happens and the thalloidness happens.; int8 -> int9: the study occurs.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the studying happens but the mobilization does not occur.; int10 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the siding amputation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the siding amputation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the siding Desmodus but not the gleaming happens. sent2: if the thalloidness does not occur the fact that the study does not occur is right. sent3: if the refining Nobel does not occur the study and the thalloidness happens. sent4: the alluding does not occur. sent5: if that either the immunization does not occur or the siding self-service does not occur or both does not hold then that the panting does not occur is not false. sent6: the siding piperacillin does not occur if the fact that the refining domino does not occur and the pant occurs is not right. sent7: if the refining domino does not occur the fact that the pant does not occur and the alluding does not occur is not true. sent8: the refining Nobel does not occur. sent9: the fact that that either the immunization does not occur or the siding self-service does not occur or both is not right is correct. sent10: either the refining domino or that the siding piperacillin does not occur or both brings about that the siding piperacillin does not occur. sent11: the siding inquirer happens. sent12: the siding amputation does not occur if the studying occurs but the mobilization does not occur. sent13: if the panting happens then either the refining domino occurs or the siding piperacillin does not occur or both. sent14: that the refining stillness does not occur and/or the impeding coke does not occur is incorrect. sent15: the siding paintball does not occur and the precedence does not occur. sent16: that the refining domino does not occur is not false if either the mobilization or the siding piperacillin or both occurs. sent17: if the fact that not the siding piperacillin but the refining domino occurs does not hold the fact that the impeding sponge does not occur is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mobilization occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the mobilization happens and/or the siding piperacillin happens hold.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the refining domino does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the pant does not occur and the alluding does not occur is not correct.; sent5 & sent9 -> int4: the pant does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the panting does not occur and the alluding does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the mobilization does not occur.; sent3 & sent8 -> int8: the study happens and the thalloidness happens.; int8 -> int9: the study occurs.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the studying happens but the mobilization does not occur.; int10 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__