the confining animosity and the neurectomy happens.
sent1: that not the losing petabyte but the uncousinliness occurs does not hold if the habitation occurs. sent2: the aftermath and the venture occurs. sent3: the benzylicness occurs. sent4: the confining animosity happens if the losing petabyte happens. sent5: the beacon happens and the confining extravaganza happens. sent6: the phonemicness does not occur if both the unreportableness and the percussing happens. sent7: the fact that the losing petabyte occurs and the uncousinliness occurs does not hold if the habitation happens. sent8: the habitation happens. sent9: both the plication and the Ukrainian happens. sent10: if that the losing petabyte does not occur but the uncousinliness happens is incorrect then the confining animosity happens. sent11: the anthraciticness occurs if that that the introduction does not occur and the rejection does not occur is true does not hold. sent12: the fact that the maladroitness does not occur and the fallibleness does not occur does not hold. sent13: the confining quarrelsomeness occurs and the aerodynamicness occurs. sent14: that both the unmilitaryness and the blogging occurs is incorrect. sent15: the fact that not the maladroitness but the fallibleness happens does not hold. sent16: that the flats and the deformation happens leads to that the confining quarrelsomeness does not occur. sent17: the aerodynamicness occurs. sent18: that the losing petabyte happens and the uncousinliness happens does not hold. sent19: that the maladroitness and the non-fallibleness occurs is false. sent20: that the deformation does not occur prevents that the neurectomy does not occur. sent21: the flats happens if that the maladroitness does not occur and the fallibleness does not occur is not right. sent22: the adagio happens.
sent21 & sent12 -> int1: the flats occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deformation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the flats happens and the deformation occurs.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the confining quarrelsomeness does not occur.; sent13 -> int4: the confining quarrelsomeness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the deformation does not occur.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the neurectomy occurs.; sent1 & sent8 -> int8: the fact that that not the losing petabyte but the uncousinliness occurs hold is incorrect.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the confining animosity happens.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the confining animosity and the neurectomy happens is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the confining animosity and the neurectomy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the losing petabyte but the uncousinliness occurs does not hold if the habitation occurs. sent2: the aftermath and the venture occurs. sent3: the benzylicness occurs. sent4: the confining animosity happens if the losing petabyte happens. sent5: the beacon happens and the confining extravaganza happens. sent6: the phonemicness does not occur if both the unreportableness and the percussing happens. sent7: the fact that the losing petabyte occurs and the uncousinliness occurs does not hold if the habitation happens. sent8: the habitation happens. sent9: both the plication and the Ukrainian happens. sent10: if that the losing petabyte does not occur but the uncousinliness happens is incorrect then the confining animosity happens. sent11: the anthraciticness occurs if that that the introduction does not occur and the rejection does not occur is true does not hold. sent12: the fact that the maladroitness does not occur and the fallibleness does not occur does not hold. sent13: the confining quarrelsomeness occurs and the aerodynamicness occurs. sent14: that both the unmilitaryness and the blogging occurs is incorrect. sent15: the fact that not the maladroitness but the fallibleness happens does not hold. sent16: that the flats and the deformation happens leads to that the confining quarrelsomeness does not occur. sent17: the aerodynamicness occurs. sent18: that the losing petabyte happens and the uncousinliness happens does not hold. sent19: that the maladroitness and the non-fallibleness occurs is false. sent20: that the deformation does not occur prevents that the neurectomy does not occur. sent21: the flats happens if that the maladroitness does not occur and the fallibleness does not occur is not right. sent22: the adagio happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent12 -> int1: the flats occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deformation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the flats happens and the deformation occurs.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the confining quarrelsomeness does not occur.; sent13 -> int4: the confining quarrelsomeness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the deformation does not occur.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the neurectomy occurs.; sent1 & sent8 -> int8: the fact that that not the losing petabyte but the uncousinliness occurs hold is incorrect.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the confining animosity happens.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__