the courtier reposits Baikal.
sent1: the neologist is not a kind of an anus if that it either is a kind of a nativist or is a kind of a impiety or both is incorrect. sent2: if that the read is not an anus is true the ancestress is not a diffidence. sent3: the plowboy is not a kind of an anus. sent4: that the neologist is not a impiety and it is not a afterpiece does not hold. sent5: the ancestress does horripilate langsyne if that the read is not a impiety and it is not an anus is wrong. sent6: if the read is not a nativist that that the neologist horripilates langsyne and/or it is a nativist does not hold hold. sent7: the plowboy does not reposit Baikal if there exists something such that it does not gazump. sent8: if the read is not an anus that the ancestress is a kind of a diffidence and/or is a kind of an anus is false. sent9: if that something is a diffidence and/or it is an anus is not right that it does not horripilate langsyne is not false. sent10: if that the read does not gazump and/or it is not hydrostatics is not wrong then it does not gazump. sent11: that the plowboy is not non-emulous or it is a stern or both does not hold. sent12: the drawbridge is not a Taricha and it does not horripilate langsyne. sent13: if the neologist is not a diffidence then the ancestress does not horripilate langsyne. sent14: the skewer does not impend and it does not boost. sent15: if something horripilates langsyne that it is not a kind of a afterpiece and is not a diffidence is not right. sent16: if the plowboy is a kind of a diffidence that does not reposit Baikal then the courtier does not reposit Baikal. sent17: if the ancestress does not horripilate langsyne that the neologist is not a impiety and it does not horripilate langsyne is not correct. sent18: the skewer is a impiety and it does horripilate langsyne if there exists something such that it does not reposit Baikal. sent19: if the plowboy is not a kind of a afterpiece the read is not an anus and it is not nativist. sent20: the plowboy is a diffidence and does not reposit Baikal if the read is a kind of a afterpiece. sent21: the read does not gazump and/or it is not hydrostatics. sent22: the plowboy is not a afterpiece. sent23: that the plowboy is non-nativist thing that is a afterpiece is incorrect.
sent19 & sent22 -> int1: the read is not an anus and it is not a kind of a nativist.; int1 -> int2: the read is not an anus.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the ancestress is a diffidence and/or it is an anus is not true.; sent9 -> int4: if the fact that either the ancestress is a diffidence or it is an anus or both is false the fact that it does not horripilate langsyne is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ancestress does not horripilate langsyne.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the neologist is not a kind of a impiety and does not horripilate langsyne is true is not correct.;
the courtier does not reposit Baikal.
$hypothesis$ = the courtier reposits Baikal. ; $context$ = sent1: the neologist is not a kind of an anus if that it either is a kind of a nativist or is a kind of a impiety or both is incorrect. sent2: if that the read is not an anus is true the ancestress is not a diffidence. sent3: the plowboy is not a kind of an anus. sent4: that the neologist is not a impiety and it is not a afterpiece does not hold. sent5: the ancestress does horripilate langsyne if that the read is not a impiety and it is not an anus is wrong. sent6: if the read is not a nativist that that the neologist horripilates langsyne and/or it is a nativist does not hold hold. sent7: the plowboy does not reposit Baikal if there exists something such that it does not gazump. sent8: if the read is not an anus that the ancestress is a kind of a diffidence and/or is a kind of an anus is false. sent9: if that something is a diffidence and/or it is an anus is not right that it does not horripilate langsyne is not false. sent10: if that the read does not gazump and/or it is not hydrostatics is not wrong then it does not gazump. sent11: that the plowboy is not non-emulous or it is a stern or both does not hold. sent12: the drawbridge is not a Taricha and it does not horripilate langsyne. sent13: if the neologist is not a diffidence then the ancestress does not horripilate langsyne. sent14: the skewer does not impend and it does not boost. sent15: if something horripilates langsyne that it is not a kind of a afterpiece and is not a diffidence is not right. sent16: if the plowboy is a kind of a diffidence that does not reposit Baikal then the courtier does not reposit Baikal. sent17: if the ancestress does not horripilate langsyne that the neologist is not a impiety and it does not horripilate langsyne is not correct. sent18: the skewer is a impiety and it does horripilate langsyne if there exists something such that it does not reposit Baikal. sent19: if the plowboy is not a kind of a afterpiece the read is not an anus and it is not nativist. sent20: the plowboy is a diffidence and does not reposit Baikal if the read is a kind of a afterpiece. sent21: the read does not gazump and/or it is not hydrostatics. sent22: the plowboy is not a afterpiece. sent23: that the plowboy is non-nativist thing that is a afterpiece is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent22 -> int1: the read is not an anus and it is not a kind of a nativist.; int1 -> int2: the read is not an anus.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the ancestress is a diffidence and/or it is an anus is not true.; sent9 -> int4: if the fact that either the ancestress is a diffidence or it is an anus or both is false the fact that it does not horripilate langsyne is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ancestress does not horripilate langsyne.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the neologist is not a kind of a impiety and does not horripilate langsyne is true is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__