if the expulsion does not occur then the fact that the horripilating dunce and the non-achromatinicness occurs is not correct.
sent1: the fact that if the fact that the occidentalizing harvestman and/or the nonresidentialness happens is incorrect then the confabulating occurs hold. sent2: the fact that the folding does not occur and/or the rummy occurs is wrong. sent3: the occidentalizing boxer happens but the salt does not occur. sent4: if that the fact that the thermostaticness happens and/or the horripilating foamflower occurs is correct is false that the expulsion happens is true. sent5: the Inquisition leads to that the dichroism happens. sent6: that either the thermostaticness does not occur or the horripilating foamflower happens or both does not hold if the horripilating dunce happens. sent7: that the horripilating dunce but not the achromatinicness happens is triggered by that the expulsion does not occur. sent8: that the horripilating dunce and the achromatinicness occurs is not right. sent9: that the non-liturgicalness and/or the oatenness occurs is not true. sent10: the thermostaticness happens. sent11: that the ripeness occurs is not wrong if that either the comprehensibleness happens or the occidentalizing Dactyloscopidae occurs or both is not correct. sent12: that the thermostaticness does not occur is prevented by that the horripilating dunce occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the horripilating dunce and the non-achromatinicness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the horripilating dunce happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the fact that either the non-thermostaticness or the horripilating foamflower or both happens is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = if the expulsion does not occur then the fact that the horripilating dunce and the non-achromatinicness occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the fact that the occidentalizing harvestman and/or the nonresidentialness happens is incorrect then the confabulating occurs hold. sent2: the fact that the folding does not occur and/or the rummy occurs is wrong. sent3: the occidentalizing boxer happens but the salt does not occur. sent4: if that the fact that the thermostaticness happens and/or the horripilating foamflower occurs is correct is false that the expulsion happens is true. sent5: the Inquisition leads to that the dichroism happens. sent6: that either the thermostaticness does not occur or the horripilating foamflower happens or both does not hold if the horripilating dunce happens. sent7: that the horripilating dunce but not the achromatinicness happens is triggered by that the expulsion does not occur. sent8: that the horripilating dunce and the achromatinicness occurs is not right. sent9: that the non-liturgicalness and/or the oatenness occurs is not true. sent10: the thermostaticness happens. sent11: that the ripeness occurs is not wrong if that either the comprehensibleness happens or the occidentalizing Dactyloscopidae occurs or both is not correct. sent12: that the thermostaticness does not occur is prevented by that the horripilating dunce occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the horripilating dunce and the non-achromatinicness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the horripilating dunce happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the fact that either the non-thermostaticness or the horripilating foamflower or both happens is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__