the Ephesians either is pyrotechnic or is a isoflurane or both.
sent1: that either something is pyrotechnic or it is a kind of a isoflurane or both is wrong if it is nonrandom. sent2: something is pyrotechnic if it does not federalize severance. sent3: the oxlip is not a Ottoman if the kvetch is not random. sent4: if a non-estimable thing is not Ottoman then it is not random. sent5: the fact that something is not non-Ottoman is not wrong. sent6: that if there exists something such that it is a Ottoman that the oxlip does not subtract kvetch and it is Ottoman is false is right. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a Ottoman and/or it is random does not hold if it is not pyrotechnic. sent8: something is a Ottoman if that it does not subtract kvetch and is not Ottoman does not hold. sent9: the kvetch is a Lesbian. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a cyclopropane and does not federalize severance is incorrect then the fact that the kvetch is not random is not incorrect. sent11: the sifter does not subtract kvetch.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the Ephesians is a kind of a cyclopropane that does not federalize severance does not hold is not incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a cyclopropane and it does not federalize severance is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the kvetch is nonrandom.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the oxlip is not a Ottoman.; sent8 -> int4: the oxlip is a Ottoman if the fact that it does not subtract kvetch and it is not a kind of a Ottoman is incorrect.; sent5 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the oxlip does not subtract kvetch and it is not a kind of a Ottoman is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the oxlip is a Ottoman.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Ephesians is a kind of a cyclopropane but it does not federalize severance.; int8 -> int9: the Ephesians does not federalize severance.; sent2 -> int10: the Ephesians is pyrotechnic if it does not federalize severance.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Ephesians is not non-pyrotechnic.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the Ephesians is a kind of a Rhone.
sent7 -> int12: the fact that the oxlip is a kind of a Ottoman or it is random or both is not correct if it is not pyrotechnic.;
$hypothesis$ = the Ephesians either is pyrotechnic or is a isoflurane or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that either something is pyrotechnic or it is a kind of a isoflurane or both is wrong if it is nonrandom. sent2: something is pyrotechnic if it does not federalize severance. sent3: the oxlip is not a Ottoman if the kvetch is not random. sent4: if a non-estimable thing is not Ottoman then it is not random. sent5: the fact that something is not non-Ottoman is not wrong. sent6: that if there exists something such that it is a Ottoman that the oxlip does not subtract kvetch and it is Ottoman is false is right. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a Ottoman and/or it is random does not hold if it is not pyrotechnic. sent8: something is a Ottoman if that it does not subtract kvetch and is not Ottoman does not hold. sent9: the kvetch is a Lesbian. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a cyclopropane and does not federalize severance is incorrect then the fact that the kvetch is not random is not incorrect. sent11: the sifter does not subtract kvetch. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the Ephesians is a kind of a cyclopropane that does not federalize severance does not hold is not incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a cyclopropane and it does not federalize severance is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the kvetch is nonrandom.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the oxlip is not a Ottoman.; sent8 -> int4: the oxlip is a Ottoman if the fact that it does not subtract kvetch and it is not a kind of a Ottoman is incorrect.; sent5 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the oxlip does not subtract kvetch and it is not a kind of a Ottoman is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the oxlip is a Ottoman.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Ephesians is a kind of a cyclopropane but it does not federalize severance.; int8 -> int9: the Ephesians does not federalize severance.; sent2 -> int10: the Ephesians is pyrotechnic if it does not federalize severance.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Ephesians is not non-pyrotechnic.; int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__