not the negligentness but the sneering occurs.
sent1: the negligentness does not occur if the scouting garnishee does not occur. sent2: both the simoom and the predating mercaptopurine occurs. sent3: that the predating technophile does not occur and the scouting garnishee does not occur is not correct if the Bell does not occur. sent4: the azimuthalness happens. sent5: that not the rushing but the predating mercaptopurine happens is triggered by the negligentness. sent6: the rush occurs. sent7: the negligentness does not occur. sent8: the simoom happens. sent9: the salivating happens. sent10: not the structuralness but the squinching shortcake occurs if the dextralness does not occur. sent11: if the match-up happens then the brunet happens. sent12: if the fact that the predating technophile does not occur and the scouting garnishee does not occur is false then the predating technophile happens. sent13: that the predating mercaptopurine does not occur is brought about by that both the rushing and the Bell occurs. sent14: the squinching WNW does not occur. sent15: not the healthfulness but the facing happens. sent16: that the scouting tomalley happens is prevented by that the redundancy and the oyster happens. sent17: if the scouting garnishee does not occur then both the non-negligentness and the sneer occurs. sent18: if the Down does not occur then the deportation occurs. sent19: the description does not occur. sent20: the synestheticness occurs and the nibble happens. sent21: the unsarcasticness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scouting garnishee occurs.; sent2 -> int1: the predating mercaptopurine happens.;
the fact that the predating technophile occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = not the negligentness but the sneering occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the negligentness does not occur if the scouting garnishee does not occur. sent2: both the simoom and the predating mercaptopurine occurs. sent3: that the predating technophile does not occur and the scouting garnishee does not occur is not correct if the Bell does not occur. sent4: the azimuthalness happens. sent5: that not the rushing but the predating mercaptopurine happens is triggered by the negligentness. sent6: the rush occurs. sent7: the negligentness does not occur. sent8: the simoom happens. sent9: the salivating happens. sent10: not the structuralness but the squinching shortcake occurs if the dextralness does not occur. sent11: if the match-up happens then the brunet happens. sent12: if the fact that the predating technophile does not occur and the scouting garnishee does not occur is false then the predating technophile happens. sent13: that the predating mercaptopurine does not occur is brought about by that both the rushing and the Bell occurs. sent14: the squinching WNW does not occur. sent15: not the healthfulness but the facing happens. sent16: that the scouting tomalley happens is prevented by that the redundancy and the oyster happens. sent17: if the scouting garnishee does not occur then both the non-negligentness and the sneer occurs. sent18: if the Down does not occur then the deportation occurs. sent19: the description does not occur. sent20: the synestheticness occurs and the nibble happens. sent21: the unsarcasticness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scouting garnishee occurs.; sent2 -> int1: the predating mercaptopurine happens.; __UNKNOWN__