the kangaroo's-foot is not stagflationary.
sent1: the kangaroo's-foot remodels subshrub. sent2: the kangaroo's-foot is a crown. sent3: if the fact that the rioter is a dark is correct it is stagflationary. sent4: if something is stagflationary it does remodel subshrub. sent5: something is re-entrant if it is a Bowie. sent6: there exists something such that that it does not remodel tunaburger and is a kind of a lacteal is false. sent7: the titanium does not remodel subshrub if the fact that it remodel subshrub and it is virulent is false. sent8: if the chink does remodel subshrub then it adjoins rioter. sent9: the kangaroo's-foot does indicate. sent10: The subshrub remodels kangaroo's-foot. sent11: if something is a liability then it is stagflationary. sent12: something is angiomatous thing that does not metamorphose if it remodels tunaburger. sent13: if something is polytheistic it does adjoin untrustworthiness. sent14: the diazoxide is a liability. sent15: if the titanium is not a kind of a Bowie then the fact that it does remodel subshrub and is virulent does not hold. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not remodel tunaburger and it is a kind of a lacteal is not correct then the titanium does remodel tunaburger. sent17: the start is a liability. sent18: if something is angiomatous then it is a liability. sent19: the fact that the kangaroo's-foot is the liability if that the kangaroo's-foot remodels subshrub is true hold.
sent19 & sent1 -> int1: the kangaroo's-foot is a liability.; sent11 -> int2: if the kangaroo's-foot is a kind of a liability then it is stagflationary.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the kangaroo's-foot is not stagflationary.
sent18 -> int3: if the titanium is angiomatous then it is a liability.; sent12 -> int4: the titanium is angiomatous thing that does not metamorphose if it does remodel tunaburger.; sent6 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the titanium remodels tunaburger is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the titanium is angiomatous and does not metamorphose.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the titanium is angiomatous is not wrong.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the titanium is a kind of a liability.;
$hypothesis$ = the kangaroo's-foot is not stagflationary. ; $context$ = sent1: the kangaroo's-foot remodels subshrub. sent2: the kangaroo's-foot is a crown. sent3: if the fact that the rioter is a dark is correct it is stagflationary. sent4: if something is stagflationary it does remodel subshrub. sent5: something is re-entrant if it is a Bowie. sent6: there exists something such that that it does not remodel tunaburger and is a kind of a lacteal is false. sent7: the titanium does not remodel subshrub if the fact that it remodel subshrub and it is virulent is false. sent8: if the chink does remodel subshrub then it adjoins rioter. sent9: the kangaroo's-foot does indicate. sent10: The subshrub remodels kangaroo's-foot. sent11: if something is a liability then it is stagflationary. sent12: something is angiomatous thing that does not metamorphose if it remodels tunaburger. sent13: if something is polytheistic it does adjoin untrustworthiness. sent14: the diazoxide is a liability. sent15: if the titanium is not a kind of a Bowie then the fact that it does remodel subshrub and is virulent does not hold. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not remodel tunaburger and it is a kind of a lacteal is not correct then the titanium does remodel tunaburger. sent17: the start is a liability. sent18: if something is angiomatous then it is a liability. sent19: the fact that the kangaroo's-foot is the liability if that the kangaroo's-foot remodels subshrub is true hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent1 -> int1: the kangaroo's-foot is a liability.; sent11 -> int2: if the kangaroo's-foot is a kind of a liability then it is stagflationary.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__