that the dacryon is a kind of non-future a beam is incorrect.
sent1: the plesiosaur is not photoelectric. sent2: the ceratosaur kayaks if the reticle is an adoration. sent3: if the ceratosaur does obscure genesis then that the stewpan is a preserver and does not obscure genesis does not hold. sent4: if the fact that something is not a Ephesians and it is not hydrostatics is not right it is an adoration. sent5: if that the plesiosaur is not photoelectric hold then that the reticle is both not Ephesians and not hydrostatics is false. sent6: that the dacryon is future a beam does not hold. sent7: if the berm is future then that the dacryon is not future but it is a beam is not true. sent8: if that the fact that the stewpan is a kind of a preserver and does not obscure genesis is not false is not true then the berm is a future. sent9: if the stewpan does obscure genesis the berm is a future. sent10: something is an adoration if it is a Ephesians. sent11: if the ceratosaur does kayak then the fact that it does obscure genesis hold.
sent4 -> int1: the reticle is a kind of an adoration if that it is not a kind of a Ephesians and is not hydrostatics is false.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the reticle is not a Ephesians and it is not hydrostatics hold is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reticle is an adoration.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the ceratosaur is a kind of a kayak.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the ceratosaur obscures genesis.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the stewpan is a preserver and does not obscure genesis does not hold.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the berm is a future is not wrong.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the dacryon is a kind of non-future a beam is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the plesiosaur is not photoelectric. sent2: the ceratosaur kayaks if the reticle is an adoration. sent3: if the ceratosaur does obscure genesis then that the stewpan is a preserver and does not obscure genesis does not hold. sent4: if the fact that something is not a Ephesians and it is not hydrostatics is not right it is an adoration. sent5: if that the plesiosaur is not photoelectric hold then that the reticle is both not Ephesians and not hydrostatics is false. sent6: that the dacryon is future a beam does not hold. sent7: if the berm is future then that the dacryon is not future but it is a beam is not true. sent8: if that the fact that the stewpan is a kind of a preserver and does not obscure genesis is not false is not true then the berm is a future. sent9: if the stewpan does obscure genesis the berm is a future. sent10: something is an adoration if it is a Ephesians. sent11: if the ceratosaur does kayak then the fact that it does obscure genesis hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the reticle is a kind of an adoration if that it is not a kind of a Ephesians and is not hydrostatics is false.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the reticle is not a Ephesians and it is not hydrostatics hold is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reticle is an adoration.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the ceratosaur is a kind of a kayak.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the ceratosaur obscures genesis.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the stewpan is a preserver and does not obscure genesis does not hold.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the berm is a future is not wrong.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__