the prosthodonticsness occurs.
sent1: that both the non-municipalness and the non-heedfulness occurs is caused by that the siding grandstander does not occur. sent2: if the Slavonicness happens then the non-limblessness and the immorality occurs. sent3: that the siding grandstander does not occur but the pranging happens is triggered by the dramatization. sent4: if not the refining octahedron but the refining exposed occurs the foreignness does not occur. sent5: the synthetic does not occur if the fact that the refusal does not occur but the siding masquerade happens is incorrect. sent6: that the refining RI occurs is prevented by that the neurotropicness does not occur and the butt-welding does not occur. sent7: if the experience occurs then not the struggle but the ceremoniousness happens. sent8: if the municipalness does not occur that the phoneticsness does not occur and the rumbling happens is incorrect. sent9: if the abduction does not occur and the aliveness does not occur then the refining hire-purchase does not occur. sent10: the refining octahedron does not occur. sent11: if the ludo occurs then the fact that the non-actinalness and the non-Slavonicness occurs is not correct. sent12: that the impeding follow-through does not occur causes the prosthodonticsness. sent13: the Slavonicness happens. sent14: that the excitement does not occur is correct. sent15: if the fact that the rumble does not occur is correct then both the impeding follow-through and the phoneticsness occurs. sent16: the rumbling does not occur if both the non-municipalness and the non-heedfulness happens. sent17: if the apophaticness occurs then the dramatization happens. sent18: that both the limbedness and the immorality happens yields the non-actinalness. sent19: the municipalness does not occur. sent20: the apophaticness occurs if the non-foreignness and the siding masquerade occurs. sent21: the impeding follow-through does not occur if the actinalness does not occur and the ludo does not occur. sent22: that the refining exposed happens is not incorrect. sent23: the wintriness does not occur. sent24: if the fact that both the non-phoneticsness and the rumble occurs does not hold then the ludo does not occur. sent25: that not the evisceration but the Chaldeanness occurs is incorrect. sent26: the refining poilu happens.
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that not the limblessness but the immorality happens is correct.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the actinalness does not occur.; sent8 & sent19 -> int3: that the non-phoneticsness and the rumbling occurs does not hold.; sent24 & int3 -> int4: the ludo does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the actinalness does not occur and the ludo does not occur.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the fact that the impeding follow-through does not occur is correct.; int6 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the prosthodonticsness does not occur.
sent10 & sent22 -> int7: not the refining octahedron but the refining exposed occurs.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the foreignness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the prosthodonticsness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the non-municipalness and the non-heedfulness occurs is caused by that the siding grandstander does not occur. sent2: if the Slavonicness happens then the non-limblessness and the immorality occurs. sent3: that the siding grandstander does not occur but the pranging happens is triggered by the dramatization. sent4: if not the refining octahedron but the refining exposed occurs the foreignness does not occur. sent5: the synthetic does not occur if the fact that the refusal does not occur but the siding masquerade happens is incorrect. sent6: that the refining RI occurs is prevented by that the neurotropicness does not occur and the butt-welding does not occur. sent7: if the experience occurs then not the struggle but the ceremoniousness happens. sent8: if the municipalness does not occur that the phoneticsness does not occur and the rumbling happens is incorrect. sent9: if the abduction does not occur and the aliveness does not occur then the refining hire-purchase does not occur. sent10: the refining octahedron does not occur. sent11: if the ludo occurs then the fact that the non-actinalness and the non-Slavonicness occurs is not correct. sent12: that the impeding follow-through does not occur causes the prosthodonticsness. sent13: the Slavonicness happens. sent14: that the excitement does not occur is correct. sent15: if the fact that the rumble does not occur is correct then both the impeding follow-through and the phoneticsness occurs. sent16: the rumbling does not occur if both the non-municipalness and the non-heedfulness happens. sent17: if the apophaticness occurs then the dramatization happens. sent18: that both the limbedness and the immorality happens yields the non-actinalness. sent19: the municipalness does not occur. sent20: the apophaticness occurs if the non-foreignness and the siding masquerade occurs. sent21: the impeding follow-through does not occur if the actinalness does not occur and the ludo does not occur. sent22: that the refining exposed happens is not incorrect. sent23: the wintriness does not occur. sent24: if the fact that both the non-phoneticsness and the rumble occurs does not hold then the ludo does not occur. sent25: that not the evisceration but the Chaldeanness occurs is incorrect. sent26: the refining poilu happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that not the limblessness but the immorality happens is correct.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the actinalness does not occur.; sent8 & sent19 -> int3: that the non-phoneticsness and the rumbling occurs does not hold.; sent24 & int3 -> int4: the ludo does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the actinalness does not occur and the ludo does not occur.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the fact that the impeding follow-through does not occur is correct.; int6 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__