the ether is a validity that does not manifest enlarger.
sent1: the count does hand shahadah. sent2: the count is unsinkable. sent3: if something is not a chopper that it is a kind of a validity that does not manifest enlarger is wrong. sent4: something is a fair or it is a execration or both if it is not a kind of a Kodiak. sent5: the fact that the count does manifest enlarger is correct. sent6: the fact that that the count does not disabuse green but it is blue-collar does not hold hold. sent7: the count is a fair if the ether is a fair. sent8: the westerly is a validity and does not overstrain pitsaw. sent9: if something is a chopper and it is a fair then it does not manifest enlarger. sent10: the count is unsinkable thing that is a kind of a jawfish. sent11: if the ether is a kind of a Muscovite that does palatalize then it is not a Kodiak. sent12: something is a chopper if the fact that it does not disabuse green and it is blue-collar is wrong. sent13: if the count is unsinkable and it is a jawfish the ether does not manifest enlarger. sent14: the deer does not manifest enlarger if the fact that it is fair and it is not a kind of a chopper is not right. sent15: the ether is a kind of a Muscovite that palatalizes.
sent13 & sent10 -> int1: the ether does not manifest enlarger.;
the auricula is not sinkable.
sent9 -> int2: the count does not manifest enlarger if the fact that it is a chopper and is a fair is not wrong.; sent12 -> int3: if the fact that the count does not disabuse green and is blue-collar does not hold then it is a chopper.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the count is a chopper.; sent4 -> int5: if the ether is not a Kodiak it is a kind of a fair and/or it is a execration.; sent11 & sent15 -> int6: the ether is not a Kodiak.; int5 & int6 -> int7: either the ether is a fair or it is a execration or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the ether is a validity that does not manifest enlarger. ; $context$ = sent1: the count does hand shahadah. sent2: the count is unsinkable. sent3: if something is not a chopper that it is a kind of a validity that does not manifest enlarger is wrong. sent4: something is a fair or it is a execration or both if it is not a kind of a Kodiak. sent5: the fact that the count does manifest enlarger is correct. sent6: the fact that that the count does not disabuse green but it is blue-collar does not hold hold. sent7: the count is a fair if the ether is a fair. sent8: the westerly is a validity and does not overstrain pitsaw. sent9: if something is a chopper and it is a fair then it does not manifest enlarger. sent10: the count is unsinkable thing that is a kind of a jawfish. sent11: if the ether is a kind of a Muscovite that does palatalize then it is not a Kodiak. sent12: something is a chopper if the fact that it does not disabuse green and it is blue-collar is wrong. sent13: if the count is unsinkable and it is a jawfish the ether does not manifest enlarger. sent14: the deer does not manifest enlarger if the fact that it is fair and it is not a kind of a chopper is not right. sent15: the ether is a kind of a Muscovite that palatalizes. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent10 -> int1: the ether does not manifest enlarger.; __UNKNOWN__