something does not mask accent but it is commodious.
sent1: if the highboy is not a kind of a ulalgia then the fact that it is not careless and it does not bawl disorganization is not right. sent2: that the highboy is not careless but it bawls disorganization is incorrect if it is not a ulalgia. sent3: there exists something such that that it is a kind of mensural thing that is non-illiterate is not right. sent4: there is something such that it is mensural and it is not a kind of an illiterate. sent5: the fact that the canaliculus is not precocial is not incorrect. sent6: there is something such that that that it is araneidal and it is not careless is not incorrect is not true. sent7: the highboy is careless if it is araneidal. sent8: there is something such that that it is a kind of mensural an illiterate does not hold. sent9: the highboy is not a ulalgia if the fact that there is something such that that it is mensural and it is not a kind of an illiterate does not hold hold. sent10: if the highboy is precocial then the canaliculus is commodious. sent11: that the canaliculus is a ulalgia or it does not mask infantryman or both is not true. sent12: the highboy is not a kind of a ulalgia if there exists something such that it is illiterate. sent13: there is something such that that it is a kind of araneidal thing that does not mask infantryman does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that it masks infantryman and is not careless. sent15: the highboy does not mask accent if there exists something such that that it is commodious and is not precocial is not true. sent16: the fact that the funnel bawls lying and/or is not careless is not true. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a hypodermic. sent18: that the highboy is a kind of non-bulbaceous thing that is not mensural is wrong if it is not bistroic. sent19: the highboy does not bawl disorganization but it masks infantryman. sent20: if that the canaliculus is not precocial hold that it is non-araneidal thing that does not bawl disorganization does not hold. sent21: the highboy does not bawl Mali. sent22: if the fact that that the highboy is not careless and it does not bawl disorganization does not hold is not wrong then the fact that it is precocial hold. sent23: the highboy is precocial if it does bawl disorganization. sent24: the canaliculus does not mask accent if that either it is not non-araneidal or it does not mask infantryman or both is incorrect. sent25: something does not mask infantryman but it is araneidal. sent26: that that the canaliculus does not bawl disorganization and it is not commodious is not true is true if it does not mask accent.
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the highboy is not a ulalgia.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the highboy is not careless and it does not bawl disorganization does not hold.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the highboy is precocial.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the canaliculus is commodious.;
$hypothesis$ = something does not mask accent but it is commodious. ; $context$ = sent1: if the highboy is not a kind of a ulalgia then the fact that it is not careless and it does not bawl disorganization is not right. sent2: that the highboy is not careless but it bawls disorganization is incorrect if it is not a ulalgia. sent3: there exists something such that that it is a kind of mensural thing that is non-illiterate is not right. sent4: there is something such that it is mensural and it is not a kind of an illiterate. sent5: the fact that the canaliculus is not precocial is not incorrect. sent6: there is something such that that that it is araneidal and it is not careless is not incorrect is not true. sent7: the highboy is careless if it is araneidal. sent8: there is something such that that it is a kind of mensural an illiterate does not hold. sent9: the highboy is not a ulalgia if the fact that there is something such that that it is mensural and it is not a kind of an illiterate does not hold hold. sent10: if the highboy is precocial then the canaliculus is commodious. sent11: that the canaliculus is a ulalgia or it does not mask infantryman or both is not true. sent12: the highboy is not a kind of a ulalgia if there exists something such that it is illiterate. sent13: there is something such that that it is a kind of araneidal thing that does not mask infantryman does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that it masks infantryman and is not careless. sent15: the highboy does not mask accent if there exists something such that that it is commodious and is not precocial is not true. sent16: the fact that the funnel bawls lying and/or is not careless is not true. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a hypodermic. sent18: that the highboy is a kind of non-bulbaceous thing that is not mensural is wrong if it is not bistroic. sent19: the highboy does not bawl disorganization but it masks infantryman. sent20: if that the canaliculus is not precocial hold that it is non-araneidal thing that does not bawl disorganization does not hold. sent21: the highboy does not bawl Mali. sent22: if the fact that that the highboy is not careless and it does not bawl disorganization does not hold is not wrong then the fact that it is precocial hold. sent23: the highboy is precocial if it does bawl disorganization. sent24: the canaliculus does not mask accent if that either it is not non-araneidal or it does not mask infantryman or both is incorrect. sent25: something does not mask infantryman but it is araneidal. sent26: that that the canaliculus does not bawl disorganization and it is not commodious is not true is true if it does not mask accent. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the highboy is not a ulalgia.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the highboy is not careless and it does not bawl disorganization does not hold.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the highboy is precocial.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the canaliculus is commodious.; __UNKNOWN__