the usherette articulates recto.
sent1: if the fracture is associative the span resents cement. sent2: something does articulate recto if it is a feasibility. sent3: the isoagglutination is a armlet if the fact that the masochist is a kind of a separated that does not articulate Schoolman does not hold. sent4: if the fracture is associative then that the span does not resent cement and/or it does grind is not true. sent5: there exists nothing such that it is a separated that does not articulate Schoolman. sent6: the usherette is a feasibility if there is something such that the fact that it does not resent cement or it is a kind of a grind or both is not right. sent7: if the isoagglutination is a armlet the fact that the fracture is associative is true.
sent5 -> int1: that the masochist is separated and does not articulate Schoolman does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the isoagglutination is a armlet.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fracture is associative.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the span does not resent cement and/or it grinds is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it does not resent cement and/or it is a grind is not correct.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the usherette is a feasibility.; sent2 -> int7: the usherette does articulate recto if that it is a kind of a feasibility is not incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the usherette articulates recto. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fracture is associative the span resents cement. sent2: something does articulate recto if it is a feasibility. sent3: the isoagglutination is a armlet if the fact that the masochist is a kind of a separated that does not articulate Schoolman does not hold. sent4: if the fracture is associative then that the span does not resent cement and/or it does grind is not true. sent5: there exists nothing such that it is a separated that does not articulate Schoolman. sent6: the usherette is a feasibility if there is something such that the fact that it does not resent cement or it is a kind of a grind or both is not right. sent7: if the isoagglutination is a armlet the fact that the fracture is associative is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that the masochist is separated and does not articulate Schoolman does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the isoagglutination is a armlet.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fracture is associative.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the span does not resent cement and/or it grinds is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it does not resent cement and/or it is a grind is not correct.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the usherette is a feasibility.; sent2 -> int7: the usherette does articulate recto if that it is a kind of a feasibility is not incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__