there is something such that if it is not infinitival then the fact that it does not jellify Antioch and does not jellify future is not true.
sent1: the fact that something is not a kind of a Briton and it is not a minnow is incorrect if it does not jellify dissuasion. sent2: if something does not preempt press then that it is not a pullulation and it is not an incidental is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not infinitival the fact that it does jellify Antioch and it does not jellify future is not true. sent4: if something is infinitival the fact that it does not jellify Antioch and does not jellify future does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not infinitival then it does not jellify Antioch and does not jellify future. sent6: if something is not infinitival then that it does not jellify Antioch and jellifies future is not right. sent7: the fact that something is not unprophetic and not infelicitous is wrong if it is not a blowout. sent8: the fact that the future does not jellify Antioch and is not cross-cultural does not hold if it is not incontinent. sent9: that the future jellifies Antioch and does not jellify future is not right if it is not infinitival. sent10: that the pellet is not a discount and is not a Beethoven is not right if it does not jellify future. sent11: if the future is not infinitival then that it does not jellify Antioch and jellifies future is not right. sent12: if the future is infinitival the fact that it does not jellify Antioch and does not jellify future is wrong. sent13: the future does not jellify Antioch and it does not jellify future if it is non-infinitival. sent14: there is something such that if it is not infinitival then the fact that it does not jellify Antioch and it jellifies future is false. sent15: something does not jellify Antioch and it does not jellify future if it is non-infinitival. sent16: the fact that something does jellify Antioch but it does not jellify future is incorrect if it is not infinitival. sent17: there is something such that if it is infinitival that it does not jellify Antioch and it does not jellify future does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not infinitival then the fact that it does not jellify Antioch and does not jellify future is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a kind of a Briton and it is not a minnow is incorrect if it does not jellify dissuasion. sent2: if something does not preempt press then that it is not a pullulation and it is not an incidental is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not infinitival the fact that it does jellify Antioch and it does not jellify future is not true. sent4: if something is infinitival the fact that it does not jellify Antioch and does not jellify future does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not infinitival then it does not jellify Antioch and does not jellify future. sent6: if something is not infinitival then that it does not jellify Antioch and jellifies future is not right. sent7: the fact that something is not unprophetic and not infelicitous is wrong if it is not a blowout. sent8: the fact that the future does not jellify Antioch and is not cross-cultural does not hold if it is not incontinent. sent9: that the future jellifies Antioch and does not jellify future is not right if it is not infinitival. sent10: that the pellet is not a discount and is not a Beethoven is not right if it does not jellify future. sent11: if the future is not infinitival then that it does not jellify Antioch and jellifies future is not right. sent12: if the future is infinitival the fact that it does not jellify Antioch and does not jellify future is wrong. sent13: the future does not jellify Antioch and it does not jellify future if it is non-infinitival. sent14: there is something such that if it is not infinitival then the fact that it does not jellify Antioch and it jellifies future is false. sent15: something does not jellify Antioch and it does not jellify future if it is non-infinitival. sent16: the fact that something does jellify Antioch but it does not jellify future is incorrect if it is not infinitival. sent17: there is something such that if it is infinitival that it does not jellify Antioch and it does not jellify future does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__