the fact that there exists something such that that it does not wheel lilt is not wrong is incorrect.
sent1: that the RA is not a campaigner or not causative or both is not true if the wild is not causative. sent2: the caliphate is a monte. sent3: that the RA is not periodontics or it is a kind of a hyperemia or both is not right. sent4: the RA is not a mutilation. sent5: if the wild is not noncausative then the RA is not noncausative. sent6: if the wild is noncausative the caliphate is a fantail. sent7: the RA is a Ojibwa if the wild is a campaigner. sent8: there exists something such that it wheels lilt. sent9: the wild is not a fantail. sent10: the caliphate is not a fantail. sent11: if the caliphate is not noncausative that the wild is not an uptown and/or it is ultimate does not hold. sent12: if that the RA is not a kind of a campaigner and/or is noncausative is not correct then the fact that it is a Ojibwa hold. sent13: if the RA is nonpregnant it does not rough. sent14: the RA does not wheel lilt if it is a Ojibwa. sent15: if the fact that the caliphate is not a Ojibwa is true the fact that the RA is not a fantail or it is a Ojibwa or both is not true. sent16: the lysosome does not outgeneral anarthria. sent17: the shrapnel wheels lilt. sent18: the RA is not noncausative. sent19: there exists something such that it is not noncausative. sent20: the RA is a fantail.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wild is noncausative.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the caliphate is a kind of a fantail.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the wild is not noncausative.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the RA is not a campaigner and/or it is noncausative is not right.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the RA is a Ojibwa hold.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the fact that the RA does not wheel lilt is not false.; int6 -> hypothesis;
that the wild is not an uptown and/or is ultimate is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it does not wheel lilt is not wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the RA is not a campaigner or not causative or both is not true if the wild is not causative. sent2: the caliphate is a monte. sent3: that the RA is not periodontics or it is a kind of a hyperemia or both is not right. sent4: the RA is not a mutilation. sent5: if the wild is not noncausative then the RA is not noncausative. sent6: if the wild is noncausative the caliphate is a fantail. sent7: the RA is a Ojibwa if the wild is a campaigner. sent8: there exists something such that it wheels lilt. sent9: the wild is not a fantail. sent10: the caliphate is not a fantail. sent11: if the caliphate is not noncausative that the wild is not an uptown and/or it is ultimate does not hold. sent12: if that the RA is not a kind of a campaigner and/or is noncausative is not correct then the fact that it is a Ojibwa hold. sent13: if the RA is nonpregnant it does not rough. sent14: the RA does not wheel lilt if it is a Ojibwa. sent15: if the fact that the caliphate is not a Ojibwa is true the fact that the RA is not a fantail or it is a Ojibwa or both is not true. sent16: the lysosome does not outgeneral anarthria. sent17: the shrapnel wheels lilt. sent18: the RA is not noncausative. sent19: there exists something such that it is not noncausative. sent20: the RA is a fantail. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wild is noncausative.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the caliphate is a kind of a fantail.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the wild is not noncausative.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the RA is not a campaigner and/or it is noncausative is not right.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the RA is a Ojibwa hold.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the fact that the RA does not wheel lilt is not false.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__