the brother is a sabot.
sent1: the brother does not thirst Campbell if the probenecid does not treble chlorobenzene but it does treble Azerbaijan. sent2: something is not gustatory. sent3: something either is Melanesian or trebles sketcher or both if it is not Pauline. sent4: there is something such that it is a novillero. sent5: that the letterman is not inextricable hold if it is palatial. sent6: the cashew does not treble probenecid or it is not a kind of a monohydrate or both. sent7: the probenecid is not gustatory if it is palatial. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is gustatory and/or it is a novillero is not right. sent9: if the probenecid is palatial the fact that it is gustatory or not a novillero or both is not right. sent10: the probenecid is palatial. sent11: the brother is a kind of a novillero if there is something such that that it is either palatial or not a sabot or both is incorrect. sent12: that something is a sabot and palatial does not hold if it does not thirst Campbell. sent13: the probenecid is not gustatory. sent14: the brother is palatial. sent15: there exists something such that either it is gustatory or it is not a novillero or both. sent16: if there is something such that that it is gustatory and/or is not a novillero is not true then that the brother is a sabot is correct. sent17: if the cashew does not treble probenecid and/or it is not a monohydrate the laudator is not Pauline. sent18: something does not treble chlorobenzene but it does treble Azerbaijan if it is Melanesian. sent19: that the probenecid either is gustatory or does not hitch Bonasa or both is wrong. sent20: something is a kind of a sabot or it is not palatial or both. sent21: the fact that the probenecid is a sabot is right.
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that either the probenecid is gustatory or it is not a novillero or both does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is gustatory or it is not a novillero or both does not hold.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the brother is not a sabot.
sent12 -> int3: that the brother is a kind of a sabot that is palatial does not hold if it does not thirst Campbell.; sent18 -> int4: the probenecid does not treble chlorobenzene but it does treble Azerbaijan if it is not non-Melanesian.; sent3 -> int5: if that the laudator is not Pauline hold it is Melanesian and/or it does treble sketcher.; sent17 & sent6 -> int6: the laudator is not Pauline.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the laudator is Melanesian and/or it trebles sketcher.;
$hypothesis$ = the brother is a sabot. ; $context$ = sent1: the brother does not thirst Campbell if the probenecid does not treble chlorobenzene but it does treble Azerbaijan. sent2: something is not gustatory. sent3: something either is Melanesian or trebles sketcher or both if it is not Pauline. sent4: there is something such that it is a novillero. sent5: that the letterman is not inextricable hold if it is palatial. sent6: the cashew does not treble probenecid or it is not a kind of a monohydrate or both. sent7: the probenecid is not gustatory if it is palatial. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is gustatory and/or it is a novillero is not right. sent9: if the probenecid is palatial the fact that it is gustatory or not a novillero or both is not right. sent10: the probenecid is palatial. sent11: the brother is a kind of a novillero if there is something such that that it is either palatial or not a sabot or both is incorrect. sent12: that something is a sabot and palatial does not hold if it does not thirst Campbell. sent13: the probenecid is not gustatory. sent14: the brother is palatial. sent15: there exists something such that either it is gustatory or it is not a novillero or both. sent16: if there is something such that that it is gustatory and/or is not a novillero is not true then that the brother is a sabot is correct. sent17: if the cashew does not treble probenecid and/or it is not a monohydrate the laudator is not Pauline. sent18: something does not treble chlorobenzene but it does treble Azerbaijan if it is Melanesian. sent19: that the probenecid either is gustatory or does not hitch Bonasa or both is wrong. sent20: something is a kind of a sabot or it is not palatial or both. sent21: the fact that the probenecid is a sabot is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that either the probenecid is gustatory or it is not a novillero or both does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is gustatory or it is not a novillero or both does not hold.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__