that the Gore does not occur and the deregulation does not occur is not correct.
sent1: the success does not occur if the saddening or the lacing contrivance or both occurs. sent2: the ambassadorialness does not occur. sent3: if the high-low-jack does not occur the fact that the stabling does not occur but the substitution occurs is wrong. sent4: that the high-low-jack happens is triggered by that the substitution occurs. sent5: the high-low-jack prevents that the posting does not occur. sent6: the thespianness happens. sent7: the spray does not occur. sent8: if that the Gore does not occur and the deregulation does not occur is not right then the substitution happens. sent9: if the lacing contrivance occurs the saddening happens and/or the posting does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the fact that not the lacing contrivance but the success occurs does not hold is not incorrect then the lacing contrivance happens. sent11: that the lacing contrivance does not occur and the success does not occur prevents that the high-low-jack occurs. sent12: if the fact that not the stabling but the substitution happens is not right then the fact that the stabling happens is right. sent13: that the success happens is not incorrect if the smother happens but the spray does not occur. sent14: the expecting occurs. sent15: either the canonization or the superannuation or both happens. sent16: the posting causes that the saddening occurs. sent17: the twanging occurs. sent18: the gastroscopy occurs. sent19: if the spray occurs the fact that the lacing contrivance does not occur and the success happens is incorrect. sent20: the smother occurs and the twang occurs if the ambassadorialness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Gore does not occur and the deregulation does not occur is false.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the substitution occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the high-low-jack occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the posting occurs.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the saddening happens.; int4 -> int5: the saddening happens and/or the lacing contrivance happens.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the success does not occur.; sent20 & sent2 -> int7: both the smothering and the twanging occurs.; int7 -> int8: the smothering happens.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the smothering occurs and the spray does not occur.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the success occurs.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the stablingness and the psychotherapeuticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the Gore does not occur and the deregulation does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the success does not occur if the saddening or the lacing contrivance or both occurs. sent2: the ambassadorialness does not occur. sent3: if the high-low-jack does not occur the fact that the stabling does not occur but the substitution occurs is wrong. sent4: that the high-low-jack happens is triggered by that the substitution occurs. sent5: the high-low-jack prevents that the posting does not occur. sent6: the thespianness happens. sent7: the spray does not occur. sent8: if that the Gore does not occur and the deregulation does not occur is not right then the substitution happens. sent9: if the lacing contrivance occurs the saddening happens and/or the posting does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the fact that not the lacing contrivance but the success occurs does not hold is not incorrect then the lacing contrivance happens. sent11: that the lacing contrivance does not occur and the success does not occur prevents that the high-low-jack occurs. sent12: if the fact that not the stabling but the substitution happens is not right then the fact that the stabling happens is right. sent13: that the success happens is not incorrect if the smother happens but the spray does not occur. sent14: the expecting occurs. sent15: either the canonization or the superannuation or both happens. sent16: the posting causes that the saddening occurs. sent17: the twanging occurs. sent18: the gastroscopy occurs. sent19: if the spray occurs the fact that the lacing contrivance does not occur and the success happens is incorrect. sent20: the smother occurs and the twang occurs if the ambassadorialness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Gore does not occur and the deregulation does not occur is false.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the substitution occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the high-low-jack occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the posting occurs.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the saddening happens.; int4 -> int5: the saddening happens and/or the lacing contrivance happens.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the success does not occur.; sent20 & sent2 -> int7: both the smothering and the twanging occurs.; int7 -> int8: the smothering happens.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the smothering occurs and the spray does not occur.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the success occurs.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__