the ungrammaticalness does not occur.
sent1: the ungrammaticalness does not occur if the fact that the despairing clouded happens and the mikvah happens does not hold. sent2: the superconductivity does not occur and the disengaging occurs if that the drunkenness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the disengaging does not occur and/or the drunkenness does not occur. sent4: if the GCA does not occur then that the fact that the despairing clouded happens and the mikvah occurs does not hold is correct. sent5: if the disengaging does not occur the drift occurs. sent6: if that the mime does not occur and the tribalness does not occur is false then the mime occurs. sent7: that the rustling earnest and the despairing religionism happens is wrong. sent8: that the miming occurs is prevented by that the GCA happens and the drifting occurs. sent9: that the drunkenness does not occur causes the drift. sent10: if the blend does not occur the fact that the mime does not occur and the tribalness does not occur does not hold.
sent3 & sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the drift happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the GCA happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the GCA happens and the drifting occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the miming does not occur.;
the superconductivity does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the ungrammaticalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ungrammaticalness does not occur if the fact that the despairing clouded happens and the mikvah happens does not hold. sent2: the superconductivity does not occur and the disengaging occurs if that the drunkenness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the disengaging does not occur and/or the drunkenness does not occur. sent4: if the GCA does not occur then that the fact that the despairing clouded happens and the mikvah occurs does not hold is correct. sent5: if the disengaging does not occur the drift occurs. sent6: if that the mime does not occur and the tribalness does not occur is false then the mime occurs. sent7: that the rustling earnest and the despairing religionism happens is wrong. sent8: that the miming occurs is prevented by that the GCA happens and the drifting occurs. sent9: that the drunkenness does not occur causes the drift. sent10: if the blend does not occur the fact that the mime does not occur and the tribalness does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the drift happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the GCA happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the GCA happens and the drifting occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the miming does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__