that the taffy is not an equinox and cloisters monosomy is wrong.
sent1: the doughboy sermonizes inositol. sent2: the doughboy is a kind of an equinox. sent3: the doughboy is a Arp and is not a spitfire if it sermonizes inositol. sent4: if the doughboy does cloister monosomy then the craton sermonizes inositol. sent5: that the Bond does not sermonize spy hold. sent6: if the doughboy is an equinox it is a Arp. sent7: The inositol sermonizes doughboy. sent8: if there is something such that it is a Arp and it is not a spitfire then that the wailer cloisters monosomy is correct. sent9: if the doughboy sermonizes inositol then it is a Arp. sent10: if something does not sermonize spy the fact that the taffy is extrospective and does not spend is incorrect. sent11: if something is not a sidesaddle then it is an equinox that does cloister monosomy. sent12: if the wailer cloisters monosomy the fact that the fact that the taffy is not a kind of an equinox and cloisters monosomy does not hold is not wrong. sent13: if the wailer cloisters monosomy the fact that the taffy is a kind of an equinox and it does cloisters monosomy is false. sent14: the taffy is a Ryukyuan but it is not an equinox. sent15: something is a Arp and a spitfire. sent16: something is a feint if it is a sidesaddle. sent17: the taffy does not sermonize inositol if the doughboy does not sermonize inositol and is a kind of a feint. sent18: if the fact that the doughboy is extrospective and it does sermonize inositol is not right then it does not sermonize inositol. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a feint but a sidesaddle is incorrect the doughboy is not a kind of a sidesaddle. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it is extrospective and does not spend is not true then the wailer does not nest. sent21: the taffy does sermonize inositol. sent22: that something is not a feint and is a sidesaddle does not hold if that it is not a nest is not false. sent23: the doughboy is a Arp.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the doughboy is a Arp but it is not a spitfire.; int1 -> int2: that something is a kind of a Arp but it is not a spitfire is not incorrect.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the wailer does cloister monosomy.; sent12 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the craton sermonizes inositol.
sent11 -> int4: the doughboy is a kind of an equinox that does cloister monosomy if it is not a sidesaddle.; sent22 -> int5: if the wailer does not nest then the fact that it is not a feint but a sidesaddle does not hold.; sent5 -> int6: there is something such that it does not sermonize spy.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the taffy is a kind of extrospective thing that does not spend is false.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is extrospective and it does not spend does not hold.; int8 & sent20 -> int9: the wailer is not a nest.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the wailer does not feint but it is a kind of a sidesaddle is not right.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not feint and it is a sidesaddle is wrong.; int11 & sent19 -> int12: that the doughboy is not a sidesaddle is right.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the doughboy is an equinox and it cloisters monosomy.; int13 -> int14: that the doughboy does not cloister monosomy is incorrect.; sent4 & int14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the taffy is not an equinox and cloisters monosomy is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the doughboy sermonizes inositol. sent2: the doughboy is a kind of an equinox. sent3: the doughboy is a Arp and is not a spitfire if it sermonizes inositol. sent4: if the doughboy does cloister monosomy then the craton sermonizes inositol. sent5: that the Bond does not sermonize spy hold. sent6: if the doughboy is an equinox it is a Arp. sent7: The inositol sermonizes doughboy. sent8: if there is something such that it is a Arp and it is not a spitfire then that the wailer cloisters monosomy is correct. sent9: if the doughboy sermonizes inositol then it is a Arp. sent10: if something does not sermonize spy the fact that the taffy is extrospective and does not spend is incorrect. sent11: if something is not a sidesaddle then it is an equinox that does cloister monosomy. sent12: if the wailer cloisters monosomy the fact that the fact that the taffy is not a kind of an equinox and cloisters monosomy does not hold is not wrong. sent13: if the wailer cloisters monosomy the fact that the taffy is a kind of an equinox and it does cloisters monosomy is false. sent14: the taffy is a Ryukyuan but it is not an equinox. sent15: something is a Arp and a spitfire. sent16: something is a feint if it is a sidesaddle. sent17: the taffy does not sermonize inositol if the doughboy does not sermonize inositol and is a kind of a feint. sent18: if the fact that the doughboy is extrospective and it does sermonize inositol is not right then it does not sermonize inositol. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a feint but a sidesaddle is incorrect the doughboy is not a kind of a sidesaddle. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it is extrospective and does not spend is not true then the wailer does not nest. sent21: the taffy does sermonize inositol. sent22: that something is not a feint and is a sidesaddle does not hold if that it is not a nest is not false. sent23: the doughboy is a Arp. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the doughboy is a Arp but it is not a spitfire.; int1 -> int2: that something is a kind of a Arp but it is not a spitfire is not incorrect.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the wailer does cloister monosomy.; sent12 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__