the mill-girl is not a partiality.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is not ascitic and does bead is not right the silkscreen does not revenge sultriness. sent2: the sultana does not emblazon depository. sent3: if something is a partiality then it is a precordium and does not revenge sultriness. sent4: the scrimshanker does initiate anomaly if the clozapine initiate anomaly. sent5: the clozapine initiates anomaly if there exists something such that that it is not apneic and does not initiates anomaly is not correct. sent6: the scrimshanker is non-dacitic a Brachychiton if it does initiate anomaly. sent7: the mill-girl is not a partiality if that the scrimshanker is a precordium that does diffuse is false. sent8: that the scrimshanker is a precordium and is diffused is false if the locust is not a precordium. sent9: the silkscreen revenges sultriness if it is not dacitic or it is not a Brachychiton or both. sent10: the silkscreen is not dacitic or it is not a Brachychiton or both. sent11: that the sultana is not apneic and does not initiate anomaly does not hold if the fact that it does not emblazon depository is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the locust is not ascitic but a beads is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that the fact that it is non-ascitic and it does bead hold is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the silkscreen does not revenge sultriness.; sent9 & sent10 -> int3: the silkscreen revenges sultriness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the locust is not ascitic and is a beads.;
the mill-girl is not diffused.
sent3 -> int6: if the silkscreen is a kind of a partiality it is a precordium that does not revenge sultriness.; sent11 & sent2 -> int7: the fact that the sultana is not apneic and does not initiate anomaly is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is non-apneic thing that does not initiate anomaly is not right.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the clozapine does initiate anomaly.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the scrimshanker initiates anomaly.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the scrimshanker is not dacitic but it is a kind of a Brachychiton.; int11 -> int12: something is not dacitic but a Brachychiton.;
$hypothesis$ = the mill-girl is not a partiality. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is not ascitic and does bead is not right the silkscreen does not revenge sultriness. sent2: the sultana does not emblazon depository. sent3: if something is a partiality then it is a precordium and does not revenge sultriness. sent4: the scrimshanker does initiate anomaly if the clozapine initiate anomaly. sent5: the clozapine initiates anomaly if there exists something such that that it is not apneic and does not initiates anomaly is not correct. sent6: the scrimshanker is non-dacitic a Brachychiton if it does initiate anomaly. sent7: the mill-girl is not a partiality if that the scrimshanker is a precordium that does diffuse is false. sent8: that the scrimshanker is a precordium and is diffused is false if the locust is not a precordium. sent9: the silkscreen revenges sultriness if it is not dacitic or it is not a Brachychiton or both. sent10: the silkscreen is not dacitic or it is not a Brachychiton or both. sent11: that the sultana is not apneic and does not initiate anomaly does not hold if the fact that it does not emblazon depository is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the locust is not ascitic but a beads is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that the fact that it is non-ascitic and it does bead hold is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the silkscreen does not revenge sultriness.; sent9 & sent10 -> int3: the silkscreen revenges sultriness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the locust is not ascitic and is a beads.; __UNKNOWN__