the flimsiness does not occur.
sent1: the provencalness occurs. sent2: both the Singhaleseness and the steepening occurs if the provencalness does not occur. sent3: that the remodeling skim does not occur is caused by that the photographing phosphorus does not occur and the Turkicness does not occur. sent4: if that the boondoggling and the provencalness happens is wrong then the provencalness does not occur. sent5: that the emulsifying anomie does not occur is brought about by that the steepening does not occur and the Singhaleseness does not occur. sent6: that the remodeling skim happens is prevented by that the photographing phosphorus and the non-Turkicness happens. sent7: that the interacting and the preponderating occurs leads to the non-flimsiness. sent8: the fact that the fact that not the photographing phosphorus but the Turkicness occurs hold does not hold. sent9: that the steepening does not occur but the Singhaleseness happens results in that the emulsifying anomie does not occur. sent10: that the emulsifying anomie does not occur is brought about by that the steepening happens but the Singhaleseness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the remodeling skim does not occur is not wrong if not the photographing phosphorus but the Turkicness occurs. sent12: the steepening does not occur and the Singhaleseness does not occur. sent13: that the photographing phosphorus happens but the Turkicness does not occur is false. sent14: if the fact that the photographing phosphorus does not occur and the Turkicness does not occur is wrong the fact that the adjoining disservice happens is true. sent15: if the junction does not occur then the fact that the boondoggling and the provencalness happens is not true. sent16: that the interacting occurs hold if the adjoining disservice happens. sent17: if the Singhaleseness occurs that not the preponderating but the interacting happens is not true. sent18: that the emulsifying treachery does not occur prevents the junction. sent19: the emptiness does not occur. sent20: the fact that both the preponderating and the provencalness happens is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the photographing phosphorus does not occur and the Turkicness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the remodeling skim does not occur.; sent5 & sent12 -> int2: the emulsifying anomie does not occur.; sent20 -> int3: the preponderating happens.;
the fact that the flimsiness occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = the flimsiness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the provencalness occurs. sent2: both the Singhaleseness and the steepening occurs if the provencalness does not occur. sent3: that the remodeling skim does not occur is caused by that the photographing phosphorus does not occur and the Turkicness does not occur. sent4: if that the boondoggling and the provencalness happens is wrong then the provencalness does not occur. sent5: that the emulsifying anomie does not occur is brought about by that the steepening does not occur and the Singhaleseness does not occur. sent6: that the remodeling skim happens is prevented by that the photographing phosphorus and the non-Turkicness happens. sent7: that the interacting and the preponderating occurs leads to the non-flimsiness. sent8: the fact that the fact that not the photographing phosphorus but the Turkicness occurs hold does not hold. sent9: that the steepening does not occur but the Singhaleseness happens results in that the emulsifying anomie does not occur. sent10: that the emulsifying anomie does not occur is brought about by that the steepening happens but the Singhaleseness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the remodeling skim does not occur is not wrong if not the photographing phosphorus but the Turkicness occurs. sent12: the steepening does not occur and the Singhaleseness does not occur. sent13: that the photographing phosphorus happens but the Turkicness does not occur is false. sent14: if the fact that the photographing phosphorus does not occur and the Turkicness does not occur is wrong the fact that the adjoining disservice happens is true. sent15: if the junction does not occur then the fact that the boondoggling and the provencalness happens is not true. sent16: that the interacting occurs hold if the adjoining disservice happens. sent17: if the Singhaleseness occurs that not the preponderating but the interacting happens is not true. sent18: that the emulsifying treachery does not occur prevents the junction. sent19: the emptiness does not occur. sent20: the fact that both the preponderating and the provencalness happens is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the photographing phosphorus does not occur and the Turkicness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the remodeling skim does not occur.; sent5 & sent12 -> int2: the emulsifying anomie does not occur.; sent20 -> int3: the preponderating happens.; __UNKNOWN__