the fact that the hemostat is a sleep is correct.
sent1: that the stucco does spiel is not wrong. sent2: a non-postnuptial thing that is staccato is not a reformism. sent3: the phlegm is a bear if the lecanopteris is realistic. sent4: something is an isle if it is a bear. sent5: that the phlegm does not angle needlefish and is not an isle is wrong if it is not a reformism. sent6: the oscilloscope is a kind of a sleep. sent7: the hemostat is not a kind of a sleep if the lecanopteris is not realistic. sent8: if the phlegm is a kind of an isle the stucco angles needlefish. sent9: if the stucco is a spiel it is not postnuptial but staccato. sent10: if something does angle needlefish it is a reformism. sent11: something is not a reformism if it is both a spiel and postnuptial. sent12: the hemostat is not a kind of a bear.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lecanopteris is not unrealistic.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the phlegm is a kind of a bear.; sent4 -> int2: if the phlegm is a bear it is an isle.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the phlegm is a kind of an isle.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the stucco angles needlefish is correct.; sent10 -> int5: if the stucco does angle needlefish it is a reformism.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stucco is a reformism.; sent2 -> int7: the stucco is not a kind of a reformism if it is not postnuptial and is staccato.; sent9 & sent1 -> int8: the stucco is not postnuptial but it is staccato.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stucco is not a kind of a reformism.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the lecanopteris is not realistic.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the hemostat is a kind of a sleep.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hemostat is a sleep is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the stucco does spiel is not wrong. sent2: a non-postnuptial thing that is staccato is not a reformism. sent3: the phlegm is a bear if the lecanopteris is realistic. sent4: something is an isle if it is a bear. sent5: that the phlegm does not angle needlefish and is not an isle is wrong if it is not a reformism. sent6: the oscilloscope is a kind of a sleep. sent7: the hemostat is not a kind of a sleep if the lecanopteris is not realistic. sent8: if the phlegm is a kind of an isle the stucco angles needlefish. sent9: if the stucco is a spiel it is not postnuptial but staccato. sent10: if something does angle needlefish it is a reformism. sent11: something is not a reformism if it is both a spiel and postnuptial. sent12: the hemostat is not a kind of a bear. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lecanopteris is not unrealistic.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the phlegm is a kind of a bear.; sent4 -> int2: if the phlegm is a bear it is an isle.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the phlegm is a kind of an isle.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the stucco angles needlefish is correct.; sent10 -> int5: if the stucco does angle needlefish it is a reformism.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stucco is a reformism.; sent2 -> int7: the stucco is not a kind of a reformism if it is not postnuptial and is staccato.; sent9 & sent1 -> int8: the stucco is not postnuptial but it is staccato.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stucco is not a kind of a reformism.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the lecanopteris is not realistic.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__