the admeasuring Epinephelus does not occur.
sent1: if that the bombing occurs is not wrong then the covering mattock does not occur but the splash occurs. sent2: the examining happens if the fix happens but the accusing does not occur. sent3: if that the PET happens is not incorrect the easternness happens. sent4: if the examining occurs then the flogging occurs. sent5: the covering mattock occurs if the fact that the fixing but not the accusing occurs is wrong. sent6: the non-genericness prevents the covering salai. sent7: the bombing does not occur if the matrimony does not occur. sent8: the genericness does not occur. sent9: the PET happens. sent10: if the PET happens then the fact that the flogging happens and/or the easternness does not occur does not hold. sent11: if the covering mattock happens but the splash does not occur then the fact that the admeasuring Epinephelus does not occur is right. sent12: that the accusing does not occur is true. sent13: the bombing does not occur. sent14: that the fixing happens and the accusing occurs leads to that the examining occurs. sent15: the easternness occurs. sent16: if the fact that the examining and the easternness happens is not correct then the examining does not occur. sent17: that the covering salai does not occur and the matrimony does not occur is caused by that the generic does not occur. sent18: the fact that that the fix happens and the accusing occurs is false is not incorrect. sent19: that the matrimony does not occur leads to that the splash does not occur and the bombing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fixing but not the accusing occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the examining occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the flogging occurs.; int2 -> int3: that the flogging or the non-easternness or both occurs is true.; sent10 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the flogging happens and/or the easternness does not occur is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the fixing happens but the accusing does not occur is not true.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the covering mattock occurs.; sent17 & sent8 -> int8: the covering salai does not occur and the matrimony does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the matrimony does not occur.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the splashing does not occur and the bombing does not occur.; int10 -> int11: the splash does not occur.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the covering mattock but not the splashing happens.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the admeasuring Epinephelus does not occur is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the admeasuring Epinephelus does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the bombing occurs is not wrong then the covering mattock does not occur but the splash occurs. sent2: the examining happens if the fix happens but the accusing does not occur. sent3: if that the PET happens is not incorrect the easternness happens. sent4: if the examining occurs then the flogging occurs. sent5: the covering mattock occurs if the fact that the fixing but not the accusing occurs is wrong. sent6: the non-genericness prevents the covering salai. sent7: the bombing does not occur if the matrimony does not occur. sent8: the genericness does not occur. sent9: the PET happens. sent10: if the PET happens then the fact that the flogging happens and/or the easternness does not occur does not hold. sent11: if the covering mattock happens but the splash does not occur then the fact that the admeasuring Epinephelus does not occur is right. sent12: that the accusing does not occur is true. sent13: the bombing does not occur. sent14: that the fixing happens and the accusing occurs leads to that the examining occurs. sent15: the easternness occurs. sent16: if the fact that the examining and the easternness happens is not correct then the examining does not occur. sent17: that the covering salai does not occur and the matrimony does not occur is caused by that the generic does not occur. sent18: the fact that that the fix happens and the accusing occurs is false is not incorrect. sent19: that the matrimony does not occur leads to that the splash does not occur and the bombing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fixing but not the accusing occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the examining occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the flogging occurs.; int2 -> int3: that the flogging or the non-easternness or both occurs is true.; sent10 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the flogging happens and/or the easternness does not occur is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the fixing happens but the accusing does not occur is not true.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the covering mattock occurs.; sent17 & sent8 -> int8: the covering salai does not occur and the matrimony does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the matrimony does not occur.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the splashing does not occur and the bombing does not occur.; int10 -> int11: the splash does not occur.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the covering mattock but not the splashing happens.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__