the tearing does not occur.
sent1: that not the coupling but the arborealness happens does not hold if the Eritrean happens. sent2: the tear does not occur if that the outsideness does not occur and the griping Pontiac does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the weaving does not occur hold if the alchemisticness does not occur. sent4: if the coupling occurs the alchemisticness does not occur. sent5: both the systolicness and the unalertness happens. sent6: the mistral does not occur or the seaming deadline does not occur or both. sent7: the arborealness but not the aborticide happens if the couple happens. sent8: the alchemisticness does not occur if the fact that the coupling does not occur but the arborealness occurs is not correct. sent9: that not the Eritrean but the aborticide happens is wrong if the systolicness occurs. sent10: that the mistral does not occur and/or that the seaming deadline does not occur results in that the aborticide occurs.
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the aborticide occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Eritreanness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the non-Eritreanness and the aborticide happens.; sent5 -> int3: the systolicness occurs.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the fact that both the non-Eritreanness and the aborticide occurs is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Eritreanness occurs.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: that that not the couple but the arborealness happens is wrong is not incorrect.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the alchemisticness does not occur.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the weaving does not occur.;
the tear happens.
$hypothesis$ = the tearing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the coupling but the arborealness happens does not hold if the Eritrean happens. sent2: the tear does not occur if that the outsideness does not occur and the griping Pontiac does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the weaving does not occur hold if the alchemisticness does not occur. sent4: if the coupling occurs the alchemisticness does not occur. sent5: both the systolicness and the unalertness happens. sent6: the mistral does not occur or the seaming deadline does not occur or both. sent7: the arborealness but not the aborticide happens if the couple happens. sent8: the alchemisticness does not occur if the fact that the coupling does not occur but the arborealness occurs is not correct. sent9: that not the Eritrean but the aborticide happens is wrong if the systolicness occurs. sent10: that the mistral does not occur and/or that the seaming deadline does not occur results in that the aborticide occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the aborticide occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Eritreanness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the non-Eritreanness and the aborticide happens.; sent5 -> int3: the systolicness occurs.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the fact that both the non-Eritreanness and the aborticide occurs is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Eritreanness occurs.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: that that not the couple but the arborealness happens is wrong is not incorrect.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the alchemisticness does not occur.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the weaving does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__