that the plumber is non-anagogic thing that does prevail is not correct if that the sanctuary is not a Conocarpus hold.
sent1: something is a Conocarpus if it heels crosshead. sent2: the fact that the serf is not Balzacian is true. sent3: if the sanctuary is not a kind of a Conocarpus then that it is not Balzacian and it does not detrain misuse is incorrect. sent4: if the serf borders scum then the plumber is not a kind of a deflation and it does not borders scum. sent5: the sanctuary is supernaturalist if the isochrone is a Conocarpus. sent6: if that the cardsharp is not a Austen and heels crosshead is false then the serf borders scum. sent7: if the plumber is a Conocarpus then the sanctuary does not border scum. sent8: that the cardsharp is not a kind of a Austen but it heels crosshead is wrong if the isochrone does not heels crosshead. sent9: the fact that something is non-anagogic thing that does prevail is false if it is not a deflation. sent10: if the fact that the sanctuary is not Balzacian and it does not detrain misuse is wrong the isochrone does not heel crosshead.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sanctuary is not a Conocarpus.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the sanctuary is not Balzacian and does not detrain misuse is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the isochrone does not heel crosshead.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the cardsharp is not a Austen but it heels crosshead is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the serf borders scum.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the plumber is not a deflation and does not border scum.; int5 -> int6: the plumber is not a deflation.; sent9 -> int7: the fact that the plumber is not anagogic but it does prevail is not correct if it is not a deflation.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the plumber is not anagogic but it prevails is not correct.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the simoom is both not supernaturalist and a Germanic is not correct.
sent1 -> int9: if the isochrone does heel crosshead then it is a Conocarpus.;
$hypothesis$ = that the plumber is non-anagogic thing that does prevail is not correct if that the sanctuary is not a Conocarpus hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Conocarpus if it heels crosshead. sent2: the fact that the serf is not Balzacian is true. sent3: if the sanctuary is not a kind of a Conocarpus then that it is not Balzacian and it does not detrain misuse is incorrect. sent4: if the serf borders scum then the plumber is not a kind of a deflation and it does not borders scum. sent5: the sanctuary is supernaturalist if the isochrone is a Conocarpus. sent6: if that the cardsharp is not a Austen and heels crosshead is false then the serf borders scum. sent7: if the plumber is a Conocarpus then the sanctuary does not border scum. sent8: that the cardsharp is not a kind of a Austen but it heels crosshead is wrong if the isochrone does not heels crosshead. sent9: the fact that something is non-anagogic thing that does prevail is false if it is not a deflation. sent10: if the fact that the sanctuary is not Balzacian and it does not detrain misuse is wrong the isochrone does not heel crosshead. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sanctuary is not a Conocarpus.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the sanctuary is not Balzacian and does not detrain misuse is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the isochrone does not heel crosshead.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the cardsharp is not a Austen but it heels crosshead is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the serf borders scum.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the plumber is not a deflation and does not border scum.; int5 -> int6: the plumber is not a deflation.; sent9 -> int7: the fact that the plumber is not anagogic but it does prevail is not correct if it is not a deflation.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the plumber is not anagogic but it prevails is not correct.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__