the fact that the fossil does not ambush hank and is occipital is not incorrect.
sent1: something is a Chavez and/or it is a kind of an escapement if it is not Ethiopian. sent2: the charlotte is a kind of a wrong and it is neurotropic. sent3: the fossil is an escapement. sent4: something is not non-occipital and it ambushes hank if it is not a Ethiopian. sent5: if something is a Jeroboam but it is not a kind of an escapement then the darmstadtium is citrous. sent6: the fossil does not ambush hank. sent7: the amateur is not a kind of a Ethiopian if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Ethiopian and it is not neutral does not hold. sent8: the ornithologist is not occipital if the fact that it is not a Jeroboam and it is occipital is not right. sent9: the fact that something is Ethiopian but it is not a neutral is not true if it is neurotropic. sent10: if the amateur is a kind of a Chavez then the ornithologist is an escapement. sent11: if the amateur is a kind of an escapement the ornithologist is an escapement. sent12: if the fossil is a Jeroboam it is occipital. sent13: if something is a kind of an escapement then that either it is citrous or it does not quiver linnet or both is false. sent14: that something is not a Jeroboam but it is occipital is not correct if it is an escapement. sent15: the fossil is a Jeroboam if that it is citrous and/or does not quiver linnet does not hold. sent16: The hank does not ambush fossil.
sent13 -> int1: if the fossil is an escapement then the fact that it is citrous and/or it does not quiver linnet is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the fossil is citrous or it does not quiver linnet or both is not correct.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fossil is a Jeroboam.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fossil is occipital.; int4 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the darmstadtium is citrous.
sent4 -> int5: if the ornithologist is not a Ethiopian then it is occipital and ambushes hank.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fossil does not ambush hank and is occipital is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Chavez and/or it is a kind of an escapement if it is not Ethiopian. sent2: the charlotte is a kind of a wrong and it is neurotropic. sent3: the fossil is an escapement. sent4: something is not non-occipital and it ambushes hank if it is not a Ethiopian. sent5: if something is a Jeroboam but it is not a kind of an escapement then the darmstadtium is citrous. sent6: the fossil does not ambush hank. sent7: the amateur is not a kind of a Ethiopian if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Ethiopian and it is not neutral does not hold. sent8: the ornithologist is not occipital if the fact that it is not a Jeroboam and it is occipital is not right. sent9: the fact that something is Ethiopian but it is not a neutral is not true if it is neurotropic. sent10: if the amateur is a kind of a Chavez then the ornithologist is an escapement. sent11: if the amateur is a kind of an escapement the ornithologist is an escapement. sent12: if the fossil is a Jeroboam it is occipital. sent13: if something is a kind of an escapement then that either it is citrous or it does not quiver linnet or both is false. sent14: that something is not a Jeroboam but it is occipital is not correct if it is an escapement. sent15: the fossil is a Jeroboam if that it is citrous and/or does not quiver linnet does not hold. sent16: The hank does not ambush fossil. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the fossil is an escapement then the fact that it is citrous and/or it does not quiver linnet is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the fossil is citrous or it does not quiver linnet or both is not correct.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fossil is a Jeroboam.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fossil is occipital.; int4 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__