the fact that the petter is not a kind of a Ecuadorian and it is not an impossibility is correct.
sent1: the petter is not a saponin. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is a synergism that does concoct rhinophyma is wrong then the touchscreen is not tracheal. sent3: something is not a Ecuadorian and it is not an impossibility if it is mensal. sent4: if that the growth is not an irregular is right that the Robitussin is a synergism and concocts rhinophyma is false. sent5: if something that does not concoct microfarad is not a Ecuadorian the fact that it concocts irreligionist is true. sent6: if the petter does not concoct microfarad the fact that it is not a kind of a Ecuadorian and it is an impossibility does not hold. sent7: the fact that the petter is Ecuadorian thing that is not an impossibility does not hold. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not concoct irreligionist then the petter does not concoct microfarad. sent9: something concocts irreligionist and is not a saponin. sent10: the fact that the petter is non-Ecuadorian thing that is an impossibility is false. sent11: the fact that that the fact that the gallery does not cover and it does not concoct microfarad is not false is not right is true. sent12: if the petter does not concoct microfarad that it is both a Ecuadorian and not an impossibility is not right. sent13: the gallery is not a saponin if the sailor's-choice is not a saponin. sent14: that the gallery does concoct irreligionist and is not a kind of a saponin is false if there is something such that it is an impossibility. sent15: the sailor's-choice is not a saponin if the abbot is not a kind of a saponin and/or it is not wasteful. sent16: something is mensal if the fact that it does concoct irreligionist and is not mensal is not correct. sent17: there is something such that that it concocts irreligionist and it is a kind of a saponin does not hold. sent18: if there exists something such that that that it does concoct irreligionist and is not a saponin is true is wrong the petter does not concoct microfarad. sent19: if the touchscreen is non-tracheal then it is not a kind of a saponin and does not concoct microfarad. sent20: the gallery does not concoct microfarad and it is not a Ecuadorian. sent21: if there exists something such that it is mensal the fact that the gallery does concoct irreligionist but it is not a saponin is wrong. sent22: something is mensal. sent23: if the petter does not concoct microfarad the fact that it is not a Ecuadorian and it is not an impossibility is false. sent24: the growth is not a kind of an irregular.
sent22 & sent21 -> int1: that the gallery concocts irreligionist but it is not a saponin does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does concoct irreligionist and is not a kind of a saponin is false.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the petter does not concoct microfarad.; int3 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the coronilla is both true and not a saponin is wrong.
sent5 -> int4: if the gallery does not concoct microfarad and is not a kind of a Ecuadorian it does concoct irreligionist.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the gallery does concoct irreligionist.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the petter is not a kind of a Ecuadorian and it is not an impossibility is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the petter is not a saponin. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is a synergism that does concoct rhinophyma is wrong then the touchscreen is not tracheal. sent3: something is not a Ecuadorian and it is not an impossibility if it is mensal. sent4: if that the growth is not an irregular is right that the Robitussin is a synergism and concocts rhinophyma is false. sent5: if something that does not concoct microfarad is not a Ecuadorian the fact that it concocts irreligionist is true. sent6: if the petter does not concoct microfarad the fact that it is not a kind of a Ecuadorian and it is an impossibility does not hold. sent7: the fact that the petter is Ecuadorian thing that is not an impossibility does not hold. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not concoct irreligionist then the petter does not concoct microfarad. sent9: something concocts irreligionist and is not a saponin. sent10: the fact that the petter is non-Ecuadorian thing that is an impossibility is false. sent11: the fact that that the fact that the gallery does not cover and it does not concoct microfarad is not false is not right is true. sent12: if the petter does not concoct microfarad that it is both a Ecuadorian and not an impossibility is not right. sent13: the gallery is not a saponin if the sailor's-choice is not a saponin. sent14: that the gallery does concoct irreligionist and is not a kind of a saponin is false if there is something such that it is an impossibility. sent15: the sailor's-choice is not a saponin if the abbot is not a kind of a saponin and/or it is not wasteful. sent16: something is mensal if the fact that it does concoct irreligionist and is not mensal is not correct. sent17: there is something such that that it concocts irreligionist and it is a kind of a saponin does not hold. sent18: if there exists something such that that that it does concoct irreligionist and is not a saponin is true is wrong the petter does not concoct microfarad. sent19: if the touchscreen is non-tracheal then it is not a kind of a saponin and does not concoct microfarad. sent20: the gallery does not concoct microfarad and it is not a Ecuadorian. sent21: if there exists something such that it is mensal the fact that the gallery does concoct irreligionist but it is not a saponin is wrong. sent22: something is mensal. sent23: if the petter does not concoct microfarad the fact that it is not a Ecuadorian and it is not an impossibility is false. sent24: the growth is not a kind of an irregular. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent21 -> int1: that the gallery concocts irreligionist but it is not a saponin does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does concoct irreligionist and is not a kind of a saponin is false.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the petter does not concoct microfarad.; int3 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__