the polemics is renewable.
sent1: something is a rig and it is a French if it is not a kind of a Smalley. sent2: if something that is a coloradillo is not an affiliate it is not renewable. sent3: if something is not a differential but it is a coloradillo then the polemics is distinguishable. sent4: the leveret is an affiliate. sent5: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Passer the fact that the leveret is not a Passer and is planetary is not right. sent6: the spectrometer is a boutique. sent7: something is a coloradillo if it pitches. sent8: the Fergon is non-differential. sent9: the rep is distinguishable. sent10: if the leveret does not surmise Croatian and is not alexic it is not an affiliate. sent11: if the spectrometer is a boutique it is nascent. sent12: there exists something such that it is not differential and it is distinguishable. sent13: that the leveret does not surmise Croatian but it is a alexic is wrong. sent14: something is a Passer if the fact that it is a Xavier is not wrong. sent15: that the leveret does surmise Croatian and is not a alexic is not right. sent16: the polemics is alexic. sent17: if the fact that the leveret does not surmise Croatian and is not a kind of a alexic does not hold then it is a coloradillo. sent18: the leveret is not a kind of a differential. sent19: if that the leveret is not a Passer but it is planetary does not hold then it is not a Smalley. sent20: if there is something such that that it is not a battlesight and it is not a Erethizontidae does not hold then the helmet is a Xavier. sent21: if the polemics is distinguishable it is renewable. sent22: if the spectrometer is nascent then that the quiver is not a battlesight and is not a Erethizontidae is not correct. sent23: the leveret is not a October but it is a kind of a Passer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leveret does not surmise Croatian and is not a alexic.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the leveret is not an affiliate.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the leveret does not surmise Croatian and it is not a alexic is incorrect.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the leveret is a coloradillo.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the leveret is a kind of non-differential a coloradillo.; int5 -> int6: something is not differential but it is a coloradillo.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the polemics is distinguishable.; int7 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the polemics is not renewable.
sent2 -> int8: the fact that the polemics is not renewable hold if it is a coloradillo and it is not an affiliate.; sent1 -> int9: if the leveret is not a kind of a Smalley it is a rig and is a French.; sent14 -> int10: the helmet is a Passer if it is a kind of a Xavier.; sent11 & sent6 -> int11: the spectrometer is nascent.; sent22 & int11 -> int12: that the quiver is not a kind of a battlesight and it is not a Erethizontidae is not true.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is not a battlesight and is not a Erethizontidae is not correct.; int13 & sent20 -> int14: the fact that the helmet is a Xavier is not wrong.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the helmet is a Passer.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is a kind of a Passer.; int16 & sent5 -> int17: that the leveret is not a Passer but it is planetary is not true.; sent19 & int17 -> int18: that the leveret is not a Smalley is right.; int9 & int18 -> int19: the leveret is a rig and a French.; int19 -> int20: the leveret Frenches.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that it is a kind of a French.;
$hypothesis$ = the polemics is renewable. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a rig and it is a French if it is not a kind of a Smalley. sent2: if something that is a coloradillo is not an affiliate it is not renewable. sent3: if something is not a differential but it is a coloradillo then the polemics is distinguishable. sent4: the leveret is an affiliate. sent5: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Passer the fact that the leveret is not a Passer and is planetary is not right. sent6: the spectrometer is a boutique. sent7: something is a coloradillo if it pitches. sent8: the Fergon is non-differential. sent9: the rep is distinguishable. sent10: if the leveret does not surmise Croatian and is not alexic it is not an affiliate. sent11: if the spectrometer is a boutique it is nascent. sent12: there exists something such that it is not differential and it is distinguishable. sent13: that the leveret does not surmise Croatian but it is a alexic is wrong. sent14: something is a Passer if the fact that it is a Xavier is not wrong. sent15: that the leveret does surmise Croatian and is not a alexic is not right. sent16: the polemics is alexic. sent17: if the fact that the leveret does not surmise Croatian and is not a kind of a alexic does not hold then it is a coloradillo. sent18: the leveret is not a kind of a differential. sent19: if that the leveret is not a Passer but it is planetary does not hold then it is not a Smalley. sent20: if there is something such that that it is not a battlesight and it is not a Erethizontidae does not hold then the helmet is a Xavier. sent21: if the polemics is distinguishable it is renewable. sent22: if the spectrometer is nascent then that the quiver is not a battlesight and is not a Erethizontidae is not correct. sent23: the leveret is not a October but it is a kind of a Passer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leveret does not surmise Croatian and is not a alexic.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the leveret is not an affiliate.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the leveret does not surmise Croatian and it is not a alexic is incorrect.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the leveret is a coloradillo.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the leveret is a kind of non-differential a coloradillo.; int5 -> int6: something is not differential but it is a coloradillo.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the polemics is distinguishable.; int7 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__