the fact that there is something such that if it is not diagnostic it toasts is not correct.
sent1: something that is not a toasted is homeopathic. sent2: there exists something such that if it is diagnostic it toasts. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not subject extent then it is questionable. sent4: if something is not impartial then it is infinitival. sent5: if the component is not diagnostic then it toasts. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a maidenliness it is a Kennan. sent7: the component is a kind of a toasted if it is diagnostic.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the currant is infinitival if it is not impartial.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not diagnostic it toasts is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a toasted is homeopathic. sent2: there exists something such that if it is diagnostic it toasts. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not subject extent then it is questionable. sent4: if something is not impartial then it is infinitival. sent5: if the component is not diagnostic then it toasts. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a maidenliness it is a Kennan. sent7: the component is a kind of a toasted if it is diagnostic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__