that something does disguise iteration and juliennes parthenote is not correct.
sent1: something is a kind of a ablution if the fact that it is not a ablution and it disguises iteration is incorrect. sent2: the Chateaubriand is not deformational. sent3: there exists something such that it is not existent and it disguises port. sent4: the Mahdist is iridic. sent5: there is something such that it does not disguise port. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of existent thing that does not disguise port. sent7: if the Mahdist is iridic it is not existent. sent8: that if something barricades coffeecake it is a prescience is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the Chateaubriand is not a ablution and does disguise iteration is incorrect if the Mahdist does julienne parthenote. sent10: the shamrock overreaches if the nailer is a liked. sent11: the nailer is not disliked. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not existent and does not disguise port the Chateaubriand disguises iteration. sent13: something does disguise iteration. sent14: if there is something such that it does overreach the Mahdist does julienne parthenote and is deformational. sent15: something that is a prescience is iridic. sent16: the fact that the Chateaubriand is a ablution is true. sent17: something is not existent. sent18: something that is iridic does clap hike. sent19: the Chateaubriand is a ablution and it juliennes parthenote if it is not deformational. sent20: there exists something such that it does julienne parthenote. sent21: the Chateaubriand is a Aalst and it does barricade coffeecake. sent22: if the Mahdist is iridic then it is a kind of nonexistent thing that does not disguise port.
sent22 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the Mahdist is not existent and does not disguise port is correct.; int1 -> int2: something is not existent and it does not disguise port.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the Chateaubriand does disguise iteration.; sent19 & sent2 -> int4: the Chateaubriand is a ablution and juliennes parthenote.; int4 -> int5: the Chateaubriand juliennes parthenote.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the Chateaubriand does disguise iteration and it does julienne parthenote.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the Chateaubriand does clap hike and it is a ablution.
sent18 -> int7: if the Chateaubriand is iridic it does clap hike.; sent15 -> int8: the Chateaubriand is iridic if it is a prescience.; sent8 -> int9: if the Chateaubriand barricades coffeecake then it is a kind of a prescience.; sent21 -> int10: the Chateaubriand does barricade coffeecake.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Chateaubriand is a prescience.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the Chateaubriand is iridic.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the Chateaubriand claps hike.; sent1 -> int14: if that the Chateaubriand is not a ablution and does disguise iteration does not hold it is a ablution.; sent10 & sent11 -> int15: the shamrock does overreach.; int15 -> int16: something does overreach.; int16 & sent14 -> int17: the Mahdist juliennes parthenote and is deformational.; int17 -> int18: the Mahdist juliennes parthenote.; sent9 & int18 -> int19: that the Chateaubriand is not a ablution and disguises iteration is wrong.; int14 & int19 -> int20: that the Chateaubriand is a ablution hold.; int13 & int20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that something does disguise iteration and juliennes parthenote is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a ablution if the fact that it is not a ablution and it disguises iteration is incorrect. sent2: the Chateaubriand is not deformational. sent3: there exists something such that it is not existent and it disguises port. sent4: the Mahdist is iridic. sent5: there is something such that it does not disguise port. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of existent thing that does not disguise port. sent7: if the Mahdist is iridic it is not existent. sent8: that if something barricades coffeecake it is a prescience is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the Chateaubriand is not a ablution and does disguise iteration is incorrect if the Mahdist does julienne parthenote. sent10: the shamrock overreaches if the nailer is a liked. sent11: the nailer is not disliked. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not existent and does not disguise port the Chateaubriand disguises iteration. sent13: something does disguise iteration. sent14: if there is something such that it does overreach the Mahdist does julienne parthenote and is deformational. sent15: something that is a prescience is iridic. sent16: the fact that the Chateaubriand is a ablution is true. sent17: something is not existent. sent18: something that is iridic does clap hike. sent19: the Chateaubriand is a ablution and it juliennes parthenote if it is not deformational. sent20: there exists something such that it does julienne parthenote. sent21: the Chateaubriand is a Aalst and it does barricade coffeecake. sent22: if the Mahdist is iridic then it is a kind of nonexistent thing that does not disguise port. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the Mahdist is not existent and does not disguise port is correct.; int1 -> int2: something is not existent and it does not disguise port.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the Chateaubriand does disguise iteration.; sent19 & sent2 -> int4: the Chateaubriand is a ablution and juliennes parthenote.; int4 -> int5: the Chateaubriand juliennes parthenote.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the Chateaubriand does disguise iteration and it does julienne parthenote.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__