the extemporization does not occur.
sent1: if the supervention does not occur that the fact that not the testing but the perusing foryml occurs is true is wrong. sent2: the testing does not occur if the briefing coiled happens. sent3: that that the dissimulating does not occur and the hydrokineticness does not occur is brought about by that the immolation does not occur hold. sent4: the naturisticness does not occur if the heterosexualness occurs or the X-ray happens or both. sent5: the testing does not occur if the fact that the hat but not the briefing coiled occurs is wrong. sent6: the fact that the perusing tapa does not occur or the impinging walnut does not occur or both does not hold if the impinging habitat happens. sent7: if that the dissimulating does not occur is not incorrect both the X-ray and the Moorish occurs. sent8: the sophisticness happens. sent9: the supervention does not occur if that the perusing tapa does not occur and/or the impinging walnut does not occur is not correct. sent10: the perusing foryml does not occur. sent11: if the perusing foryml does not occur then that the hat occurs but the briefing coiled does not occur is not true. sent12: the supervention does not occur but the extemporization happens if the testing does not occur. sent13: that the impinging habitat and the commercialization occurs is caused by the non-naturisticness. sent14: if the auto-da-fe does not occur that the Moravianness but not the inconclusiveness happens does not hold. sent15: if the supervention does not occur the testing does not occur and the perusing foryml does not occur. sent16: that the multiple happens is prevented by that the parcel occurs. sent17: the proselytism does not occur.
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: that the hat but not the briefing coiled happens is not right.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the testing does not occur.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: not the supervention but the extemporization happens.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the extemporization does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the extemporization does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the supervention does not occur that the fact that not the testing but the perusing foryml occurs is true is wrong. sent2: the testing does not occur if the briefing coiled happens. sent3: that that the dissimulating does not occur and the hydrokineticness does not occur is brought about by that the immolation does not occur hold. sent4: the naturisticness does not occur if the heterosexualness occurs or the X-ray happens or both. sent5: the testing does not occur if the fact that the hat but not the briefing coiled occurs is wrong. sent6: the fact that the perusing tapa does not occur or the impinging walnut does not occur or both does not hold if the impinging habitat happens. sent7: if that the dissimulating does not occur is not incorrect both the X-ray and the Moorish occurs. sent8: the sophisticness happens. sent9: the supervention does not occur if that the perusing tapa does not occur and/or the impinging walnut does not occur is not correct. sent10: the perusing foryml does not occur. sent11: if the perusing foryml does not occur then that the hat occurs but the briefing coiled does not occur is not true. sent12: the supervention does not occur but the extemporization happens if the testing does not occur. sent13: that the impinging habitat and the commercialization occurs is caused by the non-naturisticness. sent14: if the auto-da-fe does not occur that the Moravianness but not the inconclusiveness happens does not hold. sent15: if the supervention does not occur the testing does not occur and the perusing foryml does not occur. sent16: that the multiple happens is prevented by that the parcel occurs. sent17: the proselytism does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: that the hat but not the briefing coiled happens is not right.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the testing does not occur.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: not the supervention but the extemporization happens.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__