the fact that the breathlessness but not the diffusion occurs is not true.
sent1: the fictionalness happens. sent2: the ahistoricalness and the undatableness occurs if the fact that the beckoning submergence occurs is not true. sent3: the breathlessness but not the diffusion occurs if the sophisticate does not occur. sent4: the breathlessness happens if the sophisticating does not occur. sent5: the beckoning submergence does not occur. sent6: the dining does not occur. sent7: if the fictionalness happens and the sophisticating happens the ahistoricalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sophisticate happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that both the fictionalness and the sophisticate occurs is right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the ahistoricalness does not occur.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that both the ahistoricalness and the undatableness happens is not false.; int3 -> int4: the ahistoricalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the sophisticate does not occur is not false.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the breathlessness but not the diffusion occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fictionalness happens. sent2: the ahistoricalness and the undatableness occurs if the fact that the beckoning submergence occurs is not true. sent3: the breathlessness but not the diffusion occurs if the sophisticate does not occur. sent4: the breathlessness happens if the sophisticating does not occur. sent5: the beckoning submergence does not occur. sent6: the dining does not occur. sent7: if the fictionalness happens and the sophisticating happens the ahistoricalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sophisticate happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that both the fictionalness and the sophisticate occurs is right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the ahistoricalness does not occur.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that both the ahistoricalness and the undatableness happens is not false.; int3 -> int4: the ahistoricalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the sophisticate does not occur is not false.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__