the babyminder is a fling or does not overrefine acquaintance or both.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a naivete. sent2: the revisionist does not overrefine acquaintance. sent3: if that the revisionist is non-existentialist thing that is a kind of an advertorial does not hold then it is not an advertorial. sent4: the germanium is both a limb and headless. sent5: if something is not a stonefly the fact that it does fling and/or does not overrefine acquaintance is false. sent6: the fact that the germanium is not a censoring but it does page republication is wrong. sent7: the polyester is not a censoring. sent8: there exists nothing such that it is non-existentialist and it is an advertorial. sent9: if there is something such that it is basilican and it is a stretch the revisionist is an advertorial. sent10: the polyester is a kind of a stonefly. sent11: the revisionist is not basilican. sent12: the babyminder does incline if the polyester is not basilican. sent13: if something is not a kind of a stretch then it is a fling and/or it does not overrefine acquaintance. sent14: if the polyester does not incline the babyminder is a kind of a stonefly that is basilican. sent15: the polyester is basilican and/or does not incline. sent16: if the germanium is not a stonefly and/or it is not an advertorial then that the purification is not an advertorial hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the babyminder is a stretch.; sent8 -> int1: that the revisionist is not a existentialist but it is a kind of an advertorial is not correct.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the revisionist is not an advertorial.; sent13 -> int3: if the babyminder is not a stretch either it does fling or it does not overrefine acquaintance or both.;
the fact that the babyminder either is a fling or does not overrefine acquaintance or both is not right.
sent5 -> int4: the fact that that the babyminder does fling and/or it does not overrefine acquaintance is not wrong is not true if it is not a stonefly.;
$hypothesis$ = the babyminder is a fling or does not overrefine acquaintance or both. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a naivete. sent2: the revisionist does not overrefine acquaintance. sent3: if that the revisionist is non-existentialist thing that is a kind of an advertorial does not hold then it is not an advertorial. sent4: the germanium is both a limb and headless. sent5: if something is not a stonefly the fact that it does fling and/or does not overrefine acquaintance is false. sent6: the fact that the germanium is not a censoring but it does page republication is wrong. sent7: the polyester is not a censoring. sent8: there exists nothing such that it is non-existentialist and it is an advertorial. sent9: if there is something such that it is basilican and it is a stretch the revisionist is an advertorial. sent10: the polyester is a kind of a stonefly. sent11: the revisionist is not basilican. sent12: the babyminder does incline if the polyester is not basilican. sent13: if something is not a kind of a stretch then it is a fling and/or it does not overrefine acquaintance. sent14: if the polyester does not incline the babyminder is a kind of a stonefly that is basilican. sent15: the polyester is basilican and/or does not incline. sent16: if the germanium is not a stonefly and/or it is not an advertorial then that the purification is not an advertorial hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the babyminder is a stretch.; sent8 -> int1: that the revisionist is not a existentialist but it is a kind of an advertorial is not correct.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the revisionist is not an advertorial.; sent13 -> int3: if the babyminder is not a stretch either it does fling or it does not overrefine acquaintance or both.; __UNKNOWN__