the wrester is imprudent and does not marvel isomerization.
sent1: if the wrester is Shakespearian the pussycat is imprudent. sent2: the pussycat is imprudent. sent3: the pussycat does not bay. sent4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a juxtaposition and powders eulogist. sent5: the wrester powders eulogist. sent6: that the wrester is imprudent but it does not marvel isomerization is false if the pussycat is not a Selznick. sent7: the burl is noncrucial. sent8: there is something such that it is imprudent and does marvel isomerization. sent9: the wrester is uricosuric. sent10: the pussycat does not powder eulogist. sent11: something is not a Shakespearian but it does bay if it does powder eulogist. sent12: if the pussycat is noncrucial it does bay. sent13: the roofing is imprudent. sent14: the pussycat is a kind of an operative. sent15: if something is not a Selznick then it does not marvel isomerization. sent16: there is something such that it is a juxtaposition and it does not powder eulogist. sent17: if the wrester is a Selznick the pussycat is a kind of a Shakespearian. sent18: the wrester is not prudent if there is something such that it is a kind of a juxtaposition and does not powder eulogist. sent19: if the stopover is not a Shakespearian the hatband is noncrucial but it is not a Selznick. sent20: the pussycat is noncrucial if it is a kind of a Shakespearian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wrester is a Selznick.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the pussycat is a Shakespearian.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the pussycat is noncrucial.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the pussycat does not bay is not right.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the wrester is not a kind of a Selznick.; sent15 -> int6: the wrester does not marvel isomerization if the fact that it is not a kind of a Selznick hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the wrester does not marvel isomerization.; sent16 & sent18 -> int8: the wrester is imprudent.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the wrester is imprudent but it does not marvel isomerization is not true.
sent11 -> int9: the fact that if the breech does powder eulogist the breech is non-Shakespearian thing that bays is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the wrester is imprudent and does not marvel isomerization. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wrester is Shakespearian the pussycat is imprudent. sent2: the pussycat is imprudent. sent3: the pussycat does not bay. sent4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a juxtaposition and powders eulogist. sent5: the wrester powders eulogist. sent6: that the wrester is imprudent but it does not marvel isomerization is false if the pussycat is not a Selznick. sent7: the burl is noncrucial. sent8: there is something such that it is imprudent and does marvel isomerization. sent9: the wrester is uricosuric. sent10: the pussycat does not powder eulogist. sent11: something is not a Shakespearian but it does bay if it does powder eulogist. sent12: if the pussycat is noncrucial it does bay. sent13: the roofing is imprudent. sent14: the pussycat is a kind of an operative. sent15: if something is not a Selznick then it does not marvel isomerization. sent16: there is something such that it is a juxtaposition and it does not powder eulogist. sent17: if the wrester is a Selznick the pussycat is a kind of a Shakespearian. sent18: the wrester is not prudent if there is something such that it is a kind of a juxtaposition and does not powder eulogist. sent19: if the stopover is not a Shakespearian the hatband is noncrucial but it is not a Selznick. sent20: the pussycat is noncrucial if it is a kind of a Shakespearian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wrester is a Selznick.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the pussycat is a Shakespearian.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the pussycat is noncrucial.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the pussycat does not bay is not right.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the wrester is not a kind of a Selznick.; sent15 -> int6: the wrester does not marvel isomerization if the fact that it is not a kind of a Selznick hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the wrester does not marvel isomerization.; sent16 & sent18 -> int8: the wrester is imprudent.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__