the wolf is a foreshank.
sent1: the boyfriend dilates cracker. sent2: the fact that something is a foreshank but not a tackle does not hold if the fact that it does not dilate cracker hold. sent3: the Mesa is not a Shawwal but aldermanic if the senna tackles. sent4: the senna does tackle. sent5: the wolf is a kind of a foreshank if there exists something such that it is prejudicial. sent6: if the isocyanate dilates cracker the boyfriend does dilates cracker. sent7: the isocyanate does dilate cracker if the Mesa is not a Shawwal but it is aldermanic. sent8: the Mesa is not a kind of a Shawwal if the senna tackles. sent9: if something is not a dermatology then that it is a lumber that does not dilate cracker is incorrect. sent10: the Mesa is not a Shawwal. sent11: if there is something such that it is a kind of a lumber and/or it is prejudicial then the wolf is a kind of a foreshank. sent12: the isocyanate does dilate cracker if the Mesa is a Shawwal and it is aldermanic. sent13: if the fact that the Mesa is a tackle is not false then the senna is not aldermanic and is a tackle. sent14: if the boyfriend is not a dermatology but it does dilate cracker then the myofibril is a lumber.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the Mesa is not a Shawwal but it is aldermanic.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the isocyanate dilates cracker.;
the wolf is not a foreshank.
sent2 -> int3: if the senna does not dilate cracker then the fact that it is a kind of a foreshank and it is not a tackle does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the wolf is a foreshank. ; $context$ = sent1: the boyfriend dilates cracker. sent2: the fact that something is a foreshank but not a tackle does not hold if the fact that it does not dilate cracker hold. sent3: the Mesa is not a Shawwal but aldermanic if the senna tackles. sent4: the senna does tackle. sent5: the wolf is a kind of a foreshank if there exists something such that it is prejudicial. sent6: if the isocyanate dilates cracker the boyfriend does dilates cracker. sent7: the isocyanate does dilate cracker if the Mesa is not a Shawwal but it is aldermanic. sent8: the Mesa is not a kind of a Shawwal if the senna tackles. sent9: if something is not a dermatology then that it is a lumber that does not dilate cracker is incorrect. sent10: the Mesa is not a Shawwal. sent11: if there is something such that it is a kind of a lumber and/or it is prejudicial then the wolf is a kind of a foreshank. sent12: the isocyanate does dilate cracker if the Mesa is a Shawwal and it is aldermanic. sent13: if the fact that the Mesa is a tackle is not false then the senna is not aldermanic and is a tackle. sent14: if the boyfriend is not a dermatology but it does dilate cracker then the myofibril is a lumber. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the Mesa is not a Shawwal but it is aldermanic.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the isocyanate dilates cracker.; __UNKNOWN__