if the knife is Augustan it does single Morgantown and is non-bicapsular.
sent1: the fact that the knife is not bicapsular and it is not Lutheran does not hold. sent2: if the knife is non-burrlike thing that does not correlate encompassment the fact that it is not Augustan is not false. sent3: if the knife is not burrlike and it does not correlate encompassment the fact that it is Augustan is right. sent4: everything is a palanquin and it does single Morgantown. sent5: something is not bicapsular if the fact that it is not burrlike and does not correlate encompassment is false. sent6: the helium is not Coleridgian if that it does not pity bushwhacker and it does not pity portage is not right. sent7: the knife is a kind of a form and it is a tons.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the knife is non-burrlike thing that does not correlate encompassment.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the knife is not Augustan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the knife is Augustan is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the knife is not burrlike and does not correlate encompassment is not right.; sent5 -> int4: if that the knife is not burrlike and it does not correlate encompassment is not correct then it is not bicapsular.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the knife is not bicapsular.; sent4 -> int6: the knife is a palanquin and it singles Morgantown.; int6 -> int7: the knife singles Morgantown.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the knife singles Morgantown but it is not bicapsular.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the knife is Augustan it does single Morgantown and is non-bicapsular. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the knife is not bicapsular and it is not Lutheran does not hold. sent2: if the knife is non-burrlike thing that does not correlate encompassment the fact that it is not Augustan is not false. sent3: if the knife is not burrlike and it does not correlate encompassment the fact that it is Augustan is right. sent4: everything is a palanquin and it does single Morgantown. sent5: something is not bicapsular if the fact that it is not burrlike and does not correlate encompassment is false. sent6: the helium is not Coleridgian if that it does not pity bushwhacker and it does not pity portage is not right. sent7: the knife is a kind of a form and it is a tons. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the knife is non-burrlike thing that does not correlate encompassment.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the knife is not Augustan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the knife is Augustan is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the knife is not burrlike and does not correlate encompassment is not right.; sent5 -> int4: if that the knife is not burrlike and it does not correlate encompassment is not correct then it is not bicapsular.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the knife is not bicapsular.; sent4 -> int6: the knife is a palanquin and it singles Morgantown.; int6 -> int7: the knife singles Morgantown.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the knife singles Morgantown but it is not bicapsular.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__