the clutch is not a agateware.
sent1: if there is something such that it reduces then the spinster diffuses. sent2: if something is supernaturalist it is cerebrovascular. sent3: something is a agateware if it does dissemble lemongrass. sent4: that the Cage is dehiscent is not false. sent5: the Cage is not non-canalicular. sent6: if the spinster is a agateware then the fact that the clutch organizes ezo-yama-hagi is true. sent7: the Cage is not a chant. sent8: the fact that the fact that the punnet reduces and it is unexportable is correct is not right. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does not reduce and it is unexportable does not hold then the spinster does diffuse. sent10: that something does not chant but it is a agateware is not false. sent11: the Cage does dissemble lemongrass. sent12: if the Cage is not a chant then the fact that the punnet does not reduce but it is unexportable is not correct. sent13: if something does diffuse then it does dissemble lemongrass. sent14: the spinster is not a phobophobia. sent15: the clutch is not a agateware but it does organize ezo-yama-hagi if the spinster is a agateware.
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the punnet does not reduce and is unexportable is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not reduce and it is unexportable does not hold.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the spinster is diffusing.; sent13 -> int4: if the spinster is diffusing that it dissembles lemongrass is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the spinster dissembles lemongrass is right.; sent3 -> int6: if the spinster does dissemble lemongrass it is a kind of a agateware.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the spinster is a agateware.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the clutch is not a agateware and organizes ezo-yama-hagi.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the clutch is not a agateware. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it reduces then the spinster diffuses. sent2: if something is supernaturalist it is cerebrovascular. sent3: something is a agateware if it does dissemble lemongrass. sent4: that the Cage is dehiscent is not false. sent5: the Cage is not non-canalicular. sent6: if the spinster is a agateware then the fact that the clutch organizes ezo-yama-hagi is true. sent7: the Cage is not a chant. sent8: the fact that the fact that the punnet reduces and it is unexportable is correct is not right. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does not reduce and it is unexportable does not hold then the spinster does diffuse. sent10: that something does not chant but it is a agateware is not false. sent11: the Cage does dissemble lemongrass. sent12: if the Cage is not a chant then the fact that the punnet does not reduce but it is unexportable is not correct. sent13: if something does diffuse then it does dissemble lemongrass. sent14: the spinster is not a phobophobia. sent15: the clutch is not a agateware but it does organize ezo-yama-hagi if the spinster is a agateware. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the punnet does not reduce and is unexportable is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not reduce and it is unexportable does not hold.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the spinster is diffusing.; sent13 -> int4: if the spinster is diffusing that it dissembles lemongrass is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the spinster dissembles lemongrass is right.; sent3 -> int6: if the spinster does dissemble lemongrass it is a kind of a agateware.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the spinster is a agateware.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the clutch is not a agateware and organizes ezo-yama-hagi.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__