the dictating expropriation happens.
sent1: if both the molestation and the sopping occurs the fact that the melting does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the tribalization does not occur and the dictating telencephalon happens if the oppositeness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the bootlegging and/or the fitting occurs is wrong the vivification does not occur. sent4: the cruise does not occur if the fact that the melioration does not occur is true. sent5: the combining happens if the fact that the lie-in does not occur and the Brazilianness does not occur does not hold. sent6: the fact that the lie-in occurs but the Brazilian does not occur is not true. sent7: not the faro but the Brazilianness occurs if the sagging background happens. sent8: if the coordinate does not occur then that both the gazing and the dictating expropriation occurs is wrong. sent9: that the melioration does not occur leads to that not the cruise but the sopping occurs. sent10: if the faro occurs then the fact that the lie-in does not occur and the Brazilianness does not occur is not correct. sent11: that both the malfeasance and the battue happens brings about that the telegraphicness does not occur. sent12: if the coordinating occurs then the molestation occurs. sent13: the cruising does not occur. sent14: the faro happens. sent15: the valvotomy occurs if the combining happens. sent16: the fact that that not the lie-in but the Brazilian occurs is not wrong does not hold. sent17: if that the vivification does not occur is correct then the sagging background happens. sent18: the gaze occurs. sent19: the coordinating occurs and the gazing occurs. sent20: if the faro happens the fact that the lie-in and the non-Brazilianness happens is not right. sent21: that not the lie-in but the Brazilian happens does not hold if the faro occurs. sent22: the melioration does not occur. sent23: the dictating expropriation does not occur if that both the gazing and the dictating expropriation happens is incorrect. sent24: that the lie-in happens is prevented by that the faro does not occur but the Brazilian occurs. sent25: the fact that both the melioration and the cruising happens is not true if the lie-in does not occur.
sent19 -> int1: the coordinating happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the molestation occurs.; sent9 & sent22 -> int3: not the cruising but the sop occurs.; int3 -> int4: the sopping occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the molestation happens and the sop happens.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the melting does not occur.; sent10 & sent14 -> int7: that the lie-in does not occur and the Brazilian does not occur is not correct.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the combining occurs.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the valvotomy happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the melting does not occur but the valvotomy occurs.;
the dictating expropriation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the dictating expropriation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if both the molestation and the sopping occurs the fact that the melting does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the tribalization does not occur and the dictating telencephalon happens if the oppositeness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the bootlegging and/or the fitting occurs is wrong the vivification does not occur. sent4: the cruise does not occur if the fact that the melioration does not occur is true. sent5: the combining happens if the fact that the lie-in does not occur and the Brazilianness does not occur does not hold. sent6: the fact that the lie-in occurs but the Brazilian does not occur is not true. sent7: not the faro but the Brazilianness occurs if the sagging background happens. sent8: if the coordinate does not occur then that both the gazing and the dictating expropriation occurs is wrong. sent9: that the melioration does not occur leads to that not the cruise but the sopping occurs. sent10: if the faro occurs then the fact that the lie-in does not occur and the Brazilianness does not occur is not correct. sent11: that both the malfeasance and the battue happens brings about that the telegraphicness does not occur. sent12: if the coordinating occurs then the molestation occurs. sent13: the cruising does not occur. sent14: the faro happens. sent15: the valvotomy occurs if the combining happens. sent16: the fact that that not the lie-in but the Brazilian occurs is not wrong does not hold. sent17: if that the vivification does not occur is correct then the sagging background happens. sent18: the gaze occurs. sent19: the coordinating occurs and the gazing occurs. sent20: if the faro happens the fact that the lie-in and the non-Brazilianness happens is not right. sent21: that not the lie-in but the Brazilian happens does not hold if the faro occurs. sent22: the melioration does not occur. sent23: the dictating expropriation does not occur if that both the gazing and the dictating expropriation happens is incorrect. sent24: that the lie-in happens is prevented by that the faro does not occur but the Brazilian occurs. sent25: the fact that both the melioration and the cruising happens is not true if the lie-in does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the coordinating happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the molestation occurs.; sent9 & sent22 -> int3: not the cruising but the sop occurs.; int3 -> int4: the sopping occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the molestation happens and the sop happens.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the melting does not occur.; sent10 & sent14 -> int7: that the lie-in does not occur and the Brazilian does not occur is not correct.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the combining occurs.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the valvotomy happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the melting does not occur but the valvotomy occurs.; __UNKNOWN__