the rift budgets Commelinidae.
sent1: something is chyliferous if the fact that it is not spatial or it does refine bluefish or both does not hold. sent2: the Trilby does side inexpedience if the fact that it is not a Disneyland or it is a kind of a acromion or both does not hold. sent3: the Neopolitan does not side paneled and it is not a kind of a turning. sent4: the rift does not refine bluefish. sent5: if something is chyliferous then it does budget Commelinidae. sent6: the fact that something is a Cynoglossidae and it does dump is wrong if it does not side Colorado. sent7: the rift is oncological if that it does not refine perspiration or it is majuscule or both is false. sent8: if the fact that the casement is chyliferous thing that does budget Commelinidae does not hold then the rift does not budget Commelinidae. sent9: that the bluster does not refine Hirschsprung but it does refine casement is false if there exists something such that it does not refine casement. sent10: if something is not spatial and/or refines bluefish it does not refine Hirschsprung. sent11: if the fact that the rift does not refine Hirschsprung or it impedes simper or both does not hold then it is oncological. sent12: the bluster refines Hirschsprung if the fact that it does not refines Hirschsprung and it refines casement is not correct. sent13: the rift does refine Hirschsprung and it is a Cynoglossidae. sent14: if the fact that something is a Cynoglossidae that is a kind of a dumps does not hold it is not a Cynoglossidae. sent15: if something does refine bluefish then it does not refine Hirschsprung. sent16: the fact that the perspiration does not side Colorado if something does not side paneled and it is not a turning hold. sent17: something does not refine casement if it is not a Cynoglossidae.
sent10 -> int1: if the rift is not spatial and/or does refine bluefish then it does not refine Hirschsprung.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rift is not spatial and/or it does refine bluefish.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the rift does not refine Hirschsprung.; sent13 -> int3: the rift refines Hirschsprung.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the rift is not spatial or it refines bluefish or both is incorrect.; sent1 -> int6: if the fact that the rift is not spatial and/or does refine bluefish is false it is chyliferous.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the rift is chyliferous.; sent5 -> int8: that the rift budgets Commelinidae if the rift is chyliferous is true.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the rift does not budget Commelinidae.
sent17 -> int9: the perspiration does not refine casement if it is not a Cynoglossidae.; sent14 -> int10: the perspiration is not a kind of a Cynoglossidae if the fact that it is a Cynoglossidae that is a dumps does not hold.; sent6 -> int11: if the perspiration does not side Colorado the fact that it is a Cynoglossidae and dumps is incorrect.; sent3 -> int12: there exists something such that it does not side paneled and is not a turning.; int12 & sent16 -> int13: the perspiration does not side Colorado.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the fact that that the perspiration is a Cynoglossidae and it dumps is incorrect is not incorrect.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the perspiration is not a Cynoglossidae.; int9 & int15 -> int16: the perspiration does not refine casement.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it does not refine casement.; int17 & sent9 -> int18: that the bluster does not refine Hirschsprung but it refines casement does not hold.; sent12 & int18 -> int19: the bluster does refine Hirschsprung.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that it does refine Hirschsprung.;
$hypothesis$ = the rift budgets Commelinidae. ; $context$ = sent1: something is chyliferous if the fact that it is not spatial or it does refine bluefish or both does not hold. sent2: the Trilby does side inexpedience if the fact that it is not a Disneyland or it is a kind of a acromion or both does not hold. sent3: the Neopolitan does not side paneled and it is not a kind of a turning. sent4: the rift does not refine bluefish. sent5: if something is chyliferous then it does budget Commelinidae. sent6: the fact that something is a Cynoglossidae and it does dump is wrong if it does not side Colorado. sent7: the rift is oncological if that it does not refine perspiration or it is majuscule or both is false. sent8: if the fact that the casement is chyliferous thing that does budget Commelinidae does not hold then the rift does not budget Commelinidae. sent9: that the bluster does not refine Hirschsprung but it does refine casement is false if there exists something such that it does not refine casement. sent10: if something is not spatial and/or refines bluefish it does not refine Hirschsprung. sent11: if the fact that the rift does not refine Hirschsprung or it impedes simper or both does not hold then it is oncological. sent12: the bluster refines Hirschsprung if the fact that it does not refines Hirschsprung and it refines casement is not correct. sent13: the rift does refine Hirschsprung and it is a Cynoglossidae. sent14: if the fact that something is a Cynoglossidae that is a kind of a dumps does not hold it is not a Cynoglossidae. sent15: if something does refine bluefish then it does not refine Hirschsprung. sent16: the fact that the perspiration does not side Colorado if something does not side paneled and it is not a turning hold. sent17: something does not refine casement if it is not a Cynoglossidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the rift is not spatial and/or does refine bluefish then it does not refine Hirschsprung.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rift is not spatial and/or it does refine bluefish.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the rift does not refine Hirschsprung.; sent13 -> int3: the rift refines Hirschsprung.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the rift is not spatial or it refines bluefish or both is incorrect.; sent1 -> int6: if the fact that the rift is not spatial and/or does refine bluefish is false it is chyliferous.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the rift is chyliferous.; sent5 -> int8: that the rift budgets Commelinidae if the rift is chyliferous is true.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__