the sketch does not occur.
sent1: the overpowering Manichaean or the botryoidness or both prevents that the Galwegianness occurs. sent2: the ableness happens and/or the overpowering crouton occurs. sent3: the cleaningness does not occur. sent4: the hypophysealness occurs. sent5: the ableness does not occur. sent6: that both the acquainting and the pro-choiceness happens is not wrong if the barbing Warner does not occur. sent7: if that the positivist does not occur is wrong the fact that the eliminating Salvador but not the cabinetwork happens is false. sent8: if the eliminating Salvador happens and/or the cabinetwork occurs the positivistness does not occur. sent9: either the barbing crossheading happens or the abduction occurs or both. sent10: the maundering happens. sent11: the barbing Romanticism does not occur. sent12: if that the eliminating Salvador occurs and the cabinetwork does not occur is not right the sketching does not occur. sent13: the balling or the checking or both occurs. sent14: the leave does not occur if the wringing happens. sent15: that not the eliminating Salvador but the cabinetwork occurs prevents the arousing Ulva. sent16: if that the equineness occurs and the eliminating Lamaist does not occur is wrong that the overpowering solver occurs hold. sent17: that the oophorosalpingectomy and the non-thermostaticsness happens is incorrect. sent18: the bolt does not occur and the barbing Warner does not occur if the rehabilitation does not occur. sent19: that the acquainting does not occur and the positivistness does not occur prevents that the sketch does not occur. sent20: if the fact that that the salableness occurs but the reforestation does not occur is not right is not wrong the endomorphicness happens. sent21: the eliminating Salvador happens if the fact that both the oophorosalpingectomy and the non-thermostaticsness occurs is wrong. sent22: the pro-choiceness does not occur and the acquainting does not occur.
sent21 & sent17 -> int1: the eliminating Salvador happens.; int1 -> int2: the eliminating Salvador and/or the cabinetwork happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the positivistness does not occur.; sent22 -> int4: the acquainting does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the acquainting does not occur and the positivist does not occur.; int5 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
that the arousing Ulva does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = the sketch does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the overpowering Manichaean or the botryoidness or both prevents that the Galwegianness occurs. sent2: the ableness happens and/or the overpowering crouton occurs. sent3: the cleaningness does not occur. sent4: the hypophysealness occurs. sent5: the ableness does not occur. sent6: that both the acquainting and the pro-choiceness happens is not wrong if the barbing Warner does not occur. sent7: if that the positivist does not occur is wrong the fact that the eliminating Salvador but not the cabinetwork happens is false. sent8: if the eliminating Salvador happens and/or the cabinetwork occurs the positivistness does not occur. sent9: either the barbing crossheading happens or the abduction occurs or both. sent10: the maundering happens. sent11: the barbing Romanticism does not occur. sent12: if that the eliminating Salvador occurs and the cabinetwork does not occur is not right the sketching does not occur. sent13: the balling or the checking or both occurs. sent14: the leave does not occur if the wringing happens. sent15: that not the eliminating Salvador but the cabinetwork occurs prevents the arousing Ulva. sent16: if that the equineness occurs and the eliminating Lamaist does not occur is wrong that the overpowering solver occurs hold. sent17: that the oophorosalpingectomy and the non-thermostaticsness happens is incorrect. sent18: the bolt does not occur and the barbing Warner does not occur if the rehabilitation does not occur. sent19: that the acquainting does not occur and the positivistness does not occur prevents that the sketch does not occur. sent20: if the fact that that the salableness occurs but the reforestation does not occur is not right is not wrong the endomorphicness happens. sent21: the eliminating Salvador happens if the fact that both the oophorosalpingectomy and the non-thermostaticsness occurs is wrong. sent22: the pro-choiceness does not occur and the acquainting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent17 -> int1: the eliminating Salvador happens.; int1 -> int2: the eliminating Salvador and/or the cabinetwork happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the positivistness does not occur.; sent22 -> int4: the acquainting does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the acquainting does not occur and the positivist does not occur.; int5 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__