the spinner is not cowardly.
sent1: the haplosporidian is not cowardly. sent2: if that something is cubital and it panics acanthion is wrong then that it is not cowardly is right. sent3: the spinner is not cowardly if it does not panic acanthion. sent4: the timbale is a dorbeetle and an adornment. sent5: the fact that the timbale is a revoke is not false. sent6: if that that something does not jack Reichstein but it is an adornment is correct does not hold then it is not an adornment. sent7: something is not zymoid if the fact that it is a lumen that jacks love-token is not correct. sent8: if that the timbale is a dorbeetle is not false then the acanthion is not a Mugilidae. sent9: if the acanthion is ontological the putrefaction is ontological. sent10: that something is cowardly hold if it reruns dumper. sent11: if the fact that something is pietistic and it is a millenarianism does not hold then it is not postal. sent12: that something is both not non-Viennese and not non-major is not true if it is not cowardly. sent13: that the spinner is a gar and it is cubital is wrong. sent14: the fact that either the acanthion is ontological or it does guide or both is right if there exists something such that it is ontological. sent15: if the timbale does revoke then the fact that it is ontological is not wrong. sent16: if the acanthion is a guide then the putrefaction is ontological. sent17: if the putrefaction is ontological the fact that it does not jack Reichstein and it is a kind of an adornment is incorrect. sent18: if something does not panic acanthion then the fact that it is not cowardly hold. sent19: something is a kind of a Mugilidae and it is a dorbeetle if it is not an adornment.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the spinner is cubital thing that does panic acanthion is not right it is not cowardly.;
the spinner is cowardly.
sent10 -> int2: the spinner is cowardly if it does rerun dumper.; sent19 -> int3: the putrefaction is a Mugilidae and it is a dorbeetle if it is not an adornment.; sent6 -> int4: the putrefaction is not an adornment if the fact that it does not jack Reichstein and is an adornment is not right.; sent15 & sent5 -> int5: the timbale is ontological.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is ontological.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the acanthion is ontological or it does guide or both.; int7 & sent9 & sent16 -> int8: the putrefaction is ontological.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the putrefaction does not jack Reichstein but it is an adornment is not right.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the putrefaction is not a kind of an adornment.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the putrefaction is a kind of a Mugilidae and is a dorbeetle.; int11 -> int12: the putrefaction is a Mugilidae.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is a Mugilidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the spinner is not cowardly. ; $context$ = sent1: the haplosporidian is not cowardly. sent2: if that something is cubital and it panics acanthion is wrong then that it is not cowardly is right. sent3: the spinner is not cowardly if it does not panic acanthion. sent4: the timbale is a dorbeetle and an adornment. sent5: the fact that the timbale is a revoke is not false. sent6: if that that something does not jack Reichstein but it is an adornment is correct does not hold then it is not an adornment. sent7: something is not zymoid if the fact that it is a lumen that jacks love-token is not correct. sent8: if that the timbale is a dorbeetle is not false then the acanthion is not a Mugilidae. sent9: if the acanthion is ontological the putrefaction is ontological. sent10: that something is cowardly hold if it reruns dumper. sent11: if the fact that something is pietistic and it is a millenarianism does not hold then it is not postal. sent12: that something is both not non-Viennese and not non-major is not true if it is not cowardly. sent13: that the spinner is a gar and it is cubital is wrong. sent14: the fact that either the acanthion is ontological or it does guide or both is right if there exists something such that it is ontological. sent15: if the timbale does revoke then the fact that it is ontological is not wrong. sent16: if the acanthion is a guide then the putrefaction is ontological. sent17: if the putrefaction is ontological the fact that it does not jack Reichstein and it is a kind of an adornment is incorrect. sent18: if something does not panic acanthion then the fact that it is not cowardly hold. sent19: something is a kind of a Mugilidae and it is a dorbeetle if it is not an adornment. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the spinner is cubital thing that does panic acanthion is not right it is not cowardly.; __UNKNOWN__