the lamprey is explicable.
sent1: the turnaround criticizes lamprey if it is not explicable. sent2: if there is something such that it bows Mytilidae the fact that the prick is a kind of non-hexangular thing that is explicable is not right. sent3: if the legatee is not a ladylikeness the rung bows Mytilidae and it is retinal. sent4: that the furosemide is a kind of a Blighia is right. sent5: the legatee is not a kind of a ladylikeness if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Blighia and does not criticize lamprey does not hold. sent6: the lamprey is a kind of a monal and does not criticize Aglaia. sent7: the lamprey is a kind of a birdlime. sent8: if the fact that the lamprey is not a ladylikeness is correct it is a kind of explicable thing that is a Blighia. sent9: the fact that the grantor is not a Blighia and does not criticize lamprey is not correct if there is something such that it is not a kind of a lactifuge. sent10: if that the eyebrow is a lactifuge but it does not bow Achaean is not right then the fact that the romanticist is not a kind of a lactifuge is not false. sent11: that the eyebrow is a kind of a lactifuge and does not bow Achaean is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the lamprey is not non-retinal and is not hexangular does not hold if it bows Mytilidae. sent13: something does bow Mytilidae if it is a kind of a monal and it does not criticize Aglaia.
sent13 -> int1: if the lamprey is a kind of a monal but it does not criticize Aglaia then it does bow Mytilidae.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the lamprey does bow Mytilidae.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the lamprey is retinal but it is not hexangular is incorrect.;
the lamprey is inexplicable.
sent10 & sent11 -> int4: the romanticist is not a lactifuge.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a lactifuge.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: that the grantor is not a Blighia and it does not criticize lamprey is not true.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is not a Blighia and does not criticize lamprey is not true.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: that the legatee is not a ladylikeness hold.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the rung bows Mytilidae and is retinal.; int9 -> int10: the rung does bow Mytilidae.; int10 -> int11: something bows Mytilidae.; int11 & sent2 -> int12: that that the prick is both not hexangular and explicable is incorrect is true.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-hexangular and not inexplicable is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the lamprey is explicable. ; $context$ = sent1: the turnaround criticizes lamprey if it is not explicable. sent2: if there is something such that it bows Mytilidae the fact that the prick is a kind of non-hexangular thing that is explicable is not right. sent3: if the legatee is not a ladylikeness the rung bows Mytilidae and it is retinal. sent4: that the furosemide is a kind of a Blighia is right. sent5: the legatee is not a kind of a ladylikeness if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Blighia and does not criticize lamprey does not hold. sent6: the lamprey is a kind of a monal and does not criticize Aglaia. sent7: the lamprey is a kind of a birdlime. sent8: if the fact that the lamprey is not a ladylikeness is correct it is a kind of explicable thing that is a Blighia. sent9: the fact that the grantor is not a Blighia and does not criticize lamprey is not correct if there is something such that it is not a kind of a lactifuge. sent10: if that the eyebrow is a lactifuge but it does not bow Achaean is not right then the fact that the romanticist is not a kind of a lactifuge is not false. sent11: that the eyebrow is a kind of a lactifuge and does not bow Achaean is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the lamprey is not non-retinal and is not hexangular does not hold if it bows Mytilidae. sent13: something does bow Mytilidae if it is a kind of a monal and it does not criticize Aglaia. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the lamprey is a kind of a monal but it does not criticize Aglaia then it does bow Mytilidae.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the lamprey does bow Mytilidae.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the lamprey is retinal but it is not hexangular is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__