if the solelessness occurs the hypothermicness does not occur and the serve occurs.
sent1: if the shimmy does not occur then that not the incursion but the cataphaticness happens is not true. sent2: both the non-Oxonianness and the scorching Xhosa happens. sent3: the incursion does not occur. sent4: that the shimmy does not occur is caused by that the solelessness happens and the hypothermicness happens. sent5: that the incursion occurs and the cataphaticness occurs is not true. sent6: the Sadduceanness happens. sent7: the fact that both the homileticness and the renewableness occurs is not true. sent8: the seigniory occurs. sent9: the painting does not occur if the bardicness happens and the trisecting Sydenham happens. sent10: the cross-sectionalness does not occur. sent11: if that the solelessness does not occur and the hypothermicness happens is incorrect the nonexistentness does not occur. sent12: if the shimmying does not occur then the fact that both the incursion and the cataphaticness happens does not hold. sent13: if both the fomentation and the protestantness occurs the libation does not occur. sent14: if the calling occurs not the scam but the redetermination occurs. sent15: the incursion does not occur and the cataphaticness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the solelessness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hypothermicness happens.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: both the solelessness and the hypothermicness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the shimmying does not occur is true.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the incursion does not occur but the cataphaticness happens is not right.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the hypothermicness does not occur.;
the nonexistentness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the solelessness occurs the hypothermicness does not occur and the serve occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shimmy does not occur then that not the incursion but the cataphaticness happens is not true. sent2: both the non-Oxonianness and the scorching Xhosa happens. sent3: the incursion does not occur. sent4: that the shimmy does not occur is caused by that the solelessness happens and the hypothermicness happens. sent5: that the incursion occurs and the cataphaticness occurs is not true. sent6: the Sadduceanness happens. sent7: the fact that both the homileticness and the renewableness occurs is not true. sent8: the seigniory occurs. sent9: the painting does not occur if the bardicness happens and the trisecting Sydenham happens. sent10: the cross-sectionalness does not occur. sent11: if that the solelessness does not occur and the hypothermicness happens is incorrect the nonexistentness does not occur. sent12: if the shimmying does not occur then the fact that both the incursion and the cataphaticness happens does not hold. sent13: if both the fomentation and the protestantness occurs the libation does not occur. sent14: if the calling occurs not the scam but the redetermination occurs. sent15: the incursion does not occur and the cataphaticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the solelessness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hypothermicness happens.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: both the solelessness and the hypothermicness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the shimmying does not occur is true.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the incursion does not occur but the cataphaticness happens is not right.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the hypothermicness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__