the leveret does maintain Vietnam and/or it is not non-cytotoxic.
sent1: that the fact that the leveret does maintain Vietnam and is not a Rubia is not wrong is not correct. sent2: something maintains Vietnam if it is artistic. sent3: if that something is non-artistic and it is not a concentrated is incorrect then it maintains Vietnam. sent4: the fact that the leveret is not artistic and is not a kind of a concentrated does not hold if there exists something such that that it is a Rubia is true. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Boswellia and is a blanket does not hold then the viewpoint is a kind of a Rubia. sent6: there exists something such that that it is both not a Boswellia and a blanket is wrong.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the viewpoint is a kind of a Rubia.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Rubia.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the leveret is not artistic and is not a kind of a concentrated does not hold.; sent3 -> int4: the leveret does maintain Vietnam if that the fact that it is not artistic and does not concentrate is true is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the leveret does maintain Vietnam.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the leveret does maintain Vietnam and/or it is not non-cytotoxic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the leveret does maintain Vietnam and is not a Rubia is not wrong is not correct. sent2: something maintains Vietnam if it is artistic. sent3: if that something is non-artistic and it is not a concentrated is incorrect then it maintains Vietnam. sent4: the fact that the leveret is not artistic and is not a kind of a concentrated does not hold if there exists something such that that it is a Rubia is true. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Boswellia and is a blanket does not hold then the viewpoint is a kind of a Rubia. sent6: there exists something such that that it is both not a Boswellia and a blanket is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the viewpoint is a kind of a Rubia.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Rubia.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the leveret is not artistic and is not a kind of a concentrated does not hold.; sent3 -> int4: the leveret does maintain Vietnam if that the fact that it is not artistic and does not concentrate is true is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the leveret does maintain Vietnam.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__