the diapir does not camouflage cellulosic.
sent1: if the propenoate does not camouflage Tachypleus and is a kind of a Leontodon the semimonthly does not camouflage Tachypleus. sent2: the Karok is not a Leontodon. sent3: the diapir camouflages Tachypleus if the fact that the fact that the semimonthly is identifiable and does not camouflages Tachypleus is true is not correct. sent4: if the semimonthly is thrifty it does not camouflage cellulosic. sent5: that the semimonthly is a kind of a pentlandite that is a NIJ does not hold. sent6: if the semimonthly does not camouflage Tachypleus the diapir does freshen and camouflages cellulosic. sent7: the fact that something does not camouflage Tachypleus but it camouflages cellulosic is not true if the fact that it is not identifiable is not wrong. sent8: if the semimonthly is not a Leontodon then that that it does not camouflage Tachypleus and does camouflage fractionation hold is not correct. sent9: the fact that something is not a Leontodon and does camouflage fractionation is not true if that it does not freshen is right. sent10: that the semimonthly is a kind of identifiable thing that does not camouflage Tachypleus is wrong. sent11: if the semimonthly is nonpregnant it does not clinch. sent12: something does not camouflage cellulosic if that it is not a kind of a Leontodon and it does camouflage fractionation does not hold. sent13: the diapir does not camouflage Tachypleus if it does freshen. sent14: that the semimonthly does freshen and it is identifiable is incorrect. sent15: the diapir is a kind of a gross. sent16: that the semimonthly is a kind of a Leontodon and it does camouflage Tachypleus is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the diapir freshens hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: that the diapir does not camouflage Tachypleus hold.; sent3 & sent10 -> int2: the diapir does camouflage Tachypleus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the diapir does not freshen.; sent9 -> int5: that the diapir is not a kind of a Leontodon but it does camouflage fractionation is incorrect if it does not freshen.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the diapir is not a kind of a Leontodon and camouflages fractionation is not correct.; sent12 -> int7: the diapir does not camouflage cellulosic if the fact that it is not a Leontodon and does camouflage fractionation does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the diapir does camouflage cellulosic.
$hypothesis$ = the diapir does not camouflage cellulosic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the propenoate does not camouflage Tachypleus and is a kind of a Leontodon the semimonthly does not camouflage Tachypleus. sent2: the Karok is not a Leontodon. sent3: the diapir camouflages Tachypleus if the fact that the fact that the semimonthly is identifiable and does not camouflages Tachypleus is true is not correct. sent4: if the semimonthly is thrifty it does not camouflage cellulosic. sent5: that the semimonthly is a kind of a pentlandite that is a NIJ does not hold. sent6: if the semimonthly does not camouflage Tachypleus the diapir does freshen and camouflages cellulosic. sent7: the fact that something does not camouflage Tachypleus but it camouflages cellulosic is not true if the fact that it is not identifiable is not wrong. sent8: if the semimonthly is not a Leontodon then that that it does not camouflage Tachypleus and does camouflage fractionation hold is not correct. sent9: the fact that something is not a Leontodon and does camouflage fractionation is not true if that it does not freshen is right. sent10: that the semimonthly is a kind of identifiable thing that does not camouflage Tachypleus is wrong. sent11: if the semimonthly is nonpregnant it does not clinch. sent12: something does not camouflage cellulosic if that it is not a kind of a Leontodon and it does camouflage fractionation does not hold. sent13: the diapir does not camouflage Tachypleus if it does freshen. sent14: that the semimonthly does freshen and it is identifiable is incorrect. sent15: the diapir is a kind of a gross. sent16: that the semimonthly is a kind of a Leontodon and it does camouflage Tachypleus is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the diapir freshens hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: that the diapir does not camouflage Tachypleus hold.; sent3 & sent10 -> int2: the diapir does camouflage Tachypleus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the diapir does not freshen.; sent9 -> int5: that the diapir is not a kind of a Leontodon but it does camouflage fractionation is incorrect if it does not freshen.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the diapir is not a kind of a Leontodon and camouflages fractionation is not correct.; sent12 -> int7: the diapir does not camouflage cellulosic if the fact that it is not a Leontodon and does camouflage fractionation does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__