the fact that if the confusion happens then the fact that the lithomanticness occurs but the anorthiticness does not occur is not true is not correct.
sent1: the directorship occurs and the sacrificing does not occur. sent2: the unaggressiveness does not occur if the choricness and the deveining Akhenaton occurs. sent3: the deveining maleficence does not occur if that the unmanliness does not occur and the deveining maleficence occurs is false. sent4: if both the humming neurectomy and the concretion occurs then the watching Hamamelidanthum does not occur. sent5: if the confusion occurs that the lithomanticness occurs and the anorthiticness happens is false. sent6: if the fact that not the confusion but the orient occurs does not hold the orient does not occur. sent7: the fact that not the confusion but the orienting occurs is not correct if the deveining maleficence does not occur. sent8: if the humming chenille happens then the watching limber happens but the pottery does not occur. sent9: the cloning but not the barbarization happens if the sclaffing happens. sent10: if the lithomanticness and the non-anorthiticness happens the confusion does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the non-unmanliness and the deveining maleficence happens is not correct if the baccarat happens. sent12: the abiogeneticness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the lithomanticness and the non-anorthiticness occurs.; sent10 & assump2 -> int1: the confusion does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the confusion occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the lithomanticness and the non-anorthiticness occurs does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the orient does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the confusion happens then the fact that the lithomanticness occurs but the anorthiticness does not occur is not true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the directorship occurs and the sacrificing does not occur. sent2: the unaggressiveness does not occur if the choricness and the deveining Akhenaton occurs. sent3: the deveining maleficence does not occur if that the unmanliness does not occur and the deveining maleficence occurs is false. sent4: if both the humming neurectomy and the concretion occurs then the watching Hamamelidanthum does not occur. sent5: if the confusion occurs that the lithomanticness occurs and the anorthiticness happens is false. sent6: if the fact that not the confusion but the orient occurs does not hold the orient does not occur. sent7: the fact that not the confusion but the orienting occurs is not correct if the deveining maleficence does not occur. sent8: if the humming chenille happens then the watching limber happens but the pottery does not occur. sent9: the cloning but not the barbarization happens if the sclaffing happens. sent10: if the lithomanticness and the non-anorthiticness happens the confusion does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the non-unmanliness and the deveining maleficence happens is not correct if the baccarat happens. sent12: the abiogeneticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the lithomanticness and the non-anorthiticness occurs.; sent10 & assump2 -> int1: the confusion does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the confusion occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the lithomanticness and the non-anorthiticness occurs does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__