the selsyn is a kind of a auspiciousness.
sent1: the wallpaperer annotates. sent2: if there is something such that it is iridaceous and it is a Rhenish the wallpaperer does not annotate. sent3: the fact that if the fact that the dilapidation does not annotate and is non-cismontane does not hold then the selsyn does not annotate is not wrong. sent4: if the selsyn is a Donatist that it is not a poudrin and it crenels is not right. sent5: the fact that either the wine is a Rhenish or it is cismontane or both does not hold if the vomer is not a Rhenish. sent6: something does not annotate if the fact that it is not a crenel is not incorrect. sent7: that the Tuber is not a Rhenish is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it is cismontane and does not annotate is not wrong. sent8: if something paraphrases then that it does not annotate and is not cismontane is not true. sent9: the selsyn is a kind of a auspiciousness if there exists something such that the fact that either it is a Rhenish or it is cismontane or both does not hold. sent10: the dilapidation does undercut Exaeretodon but it does not induce stocktaking. sent11: the wine is basilar but not Ionic if the hermit is hydrophobic. sent12: something undercuts Exaeretodon and/or it is a kind of a Rhenish. sent13: the dilapidation is cismontane if the vomer is a auspiciousness. sent14: that the dilapidation does not crenel is right if that the selsyn is both not a poudrin and a crenel is incorrect. sent15: if the wine is basilar and is not Ionic the wallpaperer is Ionic. sent16: something that is not resistible is Donatist thing that is a Sudanese. sent17: the hermit is both not surmountable and not non-hydrophobic. sent18: the vomer is a auspiciousness if the wallpaperer paraphrases but it is not a auspiciousness. sent19: something that is Ionic paraphrases and is not a auspiciousness. sent20: everything is not resistible and it induces chartreuse.
the selsyn is not a auspiciousness.
sent8 -> int1: that that the vomer does not annotate and it is not cismontane is not true is not false if it is a paraphrase.;
$hypothesis$ = the selsyn is a kind of a auspiciousness. ; $context$ = sent1: the wallpaperer annotates. sent2: if there is something such that it is iridaceous and it is a Rhenish the wallpaperer does not annotate. sent3: the fact that if the fact that the dilapidation does not annotate and is non-cismontane does not hold then the selsyn does not annotate is not wrong. sent4: if the selsyn is a Donatist that it is not a poudrin and it crenels is not right. sent5: the fact that either the wine is a Rhenish or it is cismontane or both does not hold if the vomer is not a Rhenish. sent6: something does not annotate if the fact that it is not a crenel is not incorrect. sent7: that the Tuber is not a Rhenish is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it is cismontane and does not annotate is not wrong. sent8: if something paraphrases then that it does not annotate and is not cismontane is not true. sent9: the selsyn is a kind of a auspiciousness if there exists something such that the fact that either it is a Rhenish or it is cismontane or both does not hold. sent10: the dilapidation does undercut Exaeretodon but it does not induce stocktaking. sent11: the wine is basilar but not Ionic if the hermit is hydrophobic. sent12: something undercuts Exaeretodon and/or it is a kind of a Rhenish. sent13: the dilapidation is cismontane if the vomer is a auspiciousness. sent14: that the dilapidation does not crenel is right if that the selsyn is both not a poudrin and a crenel is incorrect. sent15: if the wine is basilar and is not Ionic the wallpaperer is Ionic. sent16: something that is not resistible is Donatist thing that is a Sudanese. sent17: the hermit is both not surmountable and not non-hydrophobic. sent18: the vomer is a auspiciousness if the wallpaperer paraphrases but it is not a auspiciousness. sent19: something that is Ionic paraphrases and is not a auspiciousness. sent20: everything is not resistible and it induces chartreuse. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__