there is something such that if it does not exclaim chickenshit then the fact that it is not anisometropic and it does regard is false.
sent1: the fact that the chlorobenzene is anisometropic and it regards does not hold if it does not exclaim chickenshit. sent2: if the viola is not a kind of a squaretail then it does not exclaim chickenshit and it hypnotizes criticality. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Ruscus it is not a propagator but dysplastic. sent4: the chlorobenzene is a kind of non-anisometropic thing that is a regard if it does not exclaim chickenshit. sent5: there is something such that if it does not exclaim chickenshit then it is not anisometropic but a regard. sent6: there is something such that if it does not exclaim component then that it is non-antecedent and it is a kind of a slalom is false. sent7: there is something such that if it does not hypnotize wallflower then that it is a herrerasaur and is a slalom is not correct. sent8: if the chlorobenzene does exclaim chickenshit then the fact that it is non-anisometropic a regard is incorrect. sent9: that the freight is not lacustrine but it is a currant is incorrect if it is not a schooner. sent10: that the fact that the chlorobenzene does not hypnotize wallflower but it is persistent is not right if that the chlorobenzene is a kind of a regard is not incorrect hold. sent11: the fact that that the aureole is a kind of a cagoule and it is a Iapetus is false is not wrong if it is not anisometropic. sent12: if the chlorobenzene does hypnotize corundom that it is not a propagator and it does regard is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if it exclaims chickenshit then the fact that it is not anisometropic and it is a regard is false. sent14: if the chlorobenzene does not exclaim chickenshit then the fact that it is not anisometropic and it regards is not right. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a Katharevusa then it is not a burst and it is sporadic. sent16: that the component exclaims chickenshit and it exclaims suspect is incorrect if it is not pressor. sent17: the fact that something is both not commutable and sporadic is not correct if it does not circumnavigate. sent18: there exists something such that if it does not exclaim chickenshit the fact that it is anisometropic and it does regard does not hold. sent19: that the chlorobenzene is not a kind of a cupboard and is Gandhian is incorrect if the fact that it is not anisometropic is right.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
if the chlorobenzene does not circumnavigate then that it is not commutable and is sporadic does not hold.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not exclaim chickenshit then the fact that it is not anisometropic and it does regard is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the chlorobenzene is anisometropic and it regards does not hold if it does not exclaim chickenshit. sent2: if the viola is not a kind of a squaretail then it does not exclaim chickenshit and it hypnotizes criticality. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Ruscus it is not a propagator but dysplastic. sent4: the chlorobenzene is a kind of non-anisometropic thing that is a regard if it does not exclaim chickenshit. sent5: there is something such that if it does not exclaim chickenshit then it is not anisometropic but a regard. sent6: there is something such that if it does not exclaim component then that it is non-antecedent and it is a kind of a slalom is false. sent7: there is something such that if it does not hypnotize wallflower then that it is a herrerasaur and is a slalom is not correct. sent8: if the chlorobenzene does exclaim chickenshit then the fact that it is non-anisometropic a regard is incorrect. sent9: that the freight is not lacustrine but it is a currant is incorrect if it is not a schooner. sent10: that the fact that the chlorobenzene does not hypnotize wallflower but it is persistent is not right if that the chlorobenzene is a kind of a regard is not incorrect hold. sent11: the fact that that the aureole is a kind of a cagoule and it is a Iapetus is false is not wrong if it is not anisometropic. sent12: if the chlorobenzene does hypnotize corundom that it is not a propagator and it does regard is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if it exclaims chickenshit then the fact that it is not anisometropic and it is a regard is false. sent14: if the chlorobenzene does not exclaim chickenshit then the fact that it is not anisometropic and it regards is not right. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a Katharevusa then it is not a burst and it is sporadic. sent16: that the component exclaims chickenshit and it exclaims suspect is incorrect if it is not pressor. sent17: the fact that something is both not commutable and sporadic is not correct if it does not circumnavigate. sent18: there exists something such that if it does not exclaim chickenshit the fact that it is anisometropic and it does regard does not hold. sent19: that the chlorobenzene is not a kind of a cupboard and is Gandhian is incorrect if the fact that it is not anisometropic is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__