the fug occurs.
sent1: the fug does not occur if the erectingness does not occur. sent2: the sadness does not occur. sent3: that the unscientificness occurs but the biflagellateness does not occur is not correct. sent4: the steadiness occurs. sent5: the fact that the fact that the steadiness but not the exacerbation occurs does not hold hold. sent6: that either the fug happens or the exacerbation does not occur or both results in that the fug occurs. sent7: the stewing does not occur. sent8: the fact that the exacerbation does not occur hold if the immigrating occurs but the steadying does not occur. sent9: that the steadying does not occur and the exacerbation happens is not right. sent10: if the immigrating does not occur then that the redistribution happens and the grating absoluteness does not occur is false. sent11: that the disapproving non-resistant does not occur and the erectingness does not occur is incorrect if the sentientness happens. sent12: the disapproving mascara does not occur. sent13: if that the disapproving non-resistant does not occur and the erectingness does not occur is not true then the erectingness occurs. sent14: the fact that the immigrating does not occur is not false if that that the steadying does not occur and the exacerbation does not occur is wrong is correct. sent15: if that the assassination does not occur and the pedicuring does not occur is not correct the stylelessness does not occur. sent16: if the erectingness happens the fact that the redistribution happens is not false. sent17: the erectingness does not occur if that the redistribution occurs and the grating absoluteness does not occur does not hold. sent18: if the redistribution does not occur the erectingness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steadying does not occur and the exacerbation does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the steadiness does not occur.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the steadiness does not occur and the exacerbation does not occur is false.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the immigrating does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the redistribution happens and the grating absoluteness does not occur is not correct.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the erectingness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent1 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fug occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fug occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fug does not occur if the erectingness does not occur. sent2: the sadness does not occur. sent3: that the unscientificness occurs but the biflagellateness does not occur is not correct. sent4: the steadiness occurs. sent5: the fact that the fact that the steadiness but not the exacerbation occurs does not hold hold. sent6: that either the fug happens or the exacerbation does not occur or both results in that the fug occurs. sent7: the stewing does not occur. sent8: the fact that the exacerbation does not occur hold if the immigrating occurs but the steadying does not occur. sent9: that the steadying does not occur and the exacerbation happens is not right. sent10: if the immigrating does not occur then that the redistribution happens and the grating absoluteness does not occur is false. sent11: that the disapproving non-resistant does not occur and the erectingness does not occur is incorrect if the sentientness happens. sent12: the disapproving mascara does not occur. sent13: if that the disapproving non-resistant does not occur and the erectingness does not occur is not true then the erectingness occurs. sent14: the fact that the immigrating does not occur is not false if that that the steadying does not occur and the exacerbation does not occur is wrong is correct. sent15: if that the assassination does not occur and the pedicuring does not occur is not correct the stylelessness does not occur. sent16: if the erectingness happens the fact that the redistribution happens is not false. sent17: the erectingness does not occur if that the redistribution occurs and the grating absoluteness does not occur does not hold. sent18: if the redistribution does not occur the erectingness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steadying does not occur and the exacerbation does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the steadiness does not occur.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the steadiness does not occur and the exacerbation does not occur is false.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the immigrating does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the redistribution happens and the grating absoluteness does not occur is not correct.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the erectingness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent1 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__