that there is something such that if it is not saprobic and/or is not a tensiometer then it is apopemptic is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a tensiometer it is apopemptic. sent2: if the quadruplicate is not saprobic or it is a kind of a tensiometer or both that it is apopemptic is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not an acquirer or does not awe instability or both it is a kind of an oblique. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not saprobic or it is a kind of a tensiometer or both it is apopemptic. sent5: if the quadruplicate is not a kind of a microorganism and/or is not a kind of a quinquennium it is saprobic. sent6: the berlin is a kind of a Scholastic if it is not a tensiometer and/or is not garlicky. sent7: the quadruplicate is a drape if it is not a mastodon and/or it is not apopemptic. sent8: if the quadruplicate is not a kind of a hysterosalpingogram and/or it is not a coloradillo it is a pederast. sent9: there exists something such that if it is saprobic or it is not a tensiometer or both it is apopemptic. sent10: the junk latches Prussian if it is not a kind of a tensiometer and/or it is not a Nauruan. sent11: the quadruplicate is a tensiometer if it is not a kind of a smash or it is not a penciled or both. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a unison and/or it does not discountenance pneumothorax it is a pederast. sent13: if the quadruplicate is not saprobic or it is not a kind of a tensiometer or both then it is apopemptic. sent14: that there is something such that if it is not a rubicelle or not a hunger or both then it does discountenance mainmast hold. sent15: the quadruplicate is apopemptic if it is not saprobic. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not saprobic then it is apopemptic. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a tissue and/or it is not a gigabyte it is a water.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not saprobic and/or is not a tensiometer then it is apopemptic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a tensiometer it is apopemptic. sent2: if the quadruplicate is not saprobic or it is a kind of a tensiometer or both that it is apopemptic is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not an acquirer or does not awe instability or both it is a kind of an oblique. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not saprobic or it is a kind of a tensiometer or both it is apopemptic. sent5: if the quadruplicate is not a kind of a microorganism and/or is not a kind of a quinquennium it is saprobic. sent6: the berlin is a kind of a Scholastic if it is not a tensiometer and/or is not garlicky. sent7: the quadruplicate is a drape if it is not a mastodon and/or it is not apopemptic. sent8: if the quadruplicate is not a kind of a hysterosalpingogram and/or it is not a coloradillo it is a pederast. sent9: there exists something such that if it is saprobic or it is not a tensiometer or both it is apopemptic. sent10: the junk latches Prussian if it is not a kind of a tensiometer and/or it is not a Nauruan. sent11: the quadruplicate is a tensiometer if it is not a kind of a smash or it is not a penciled or both. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a unison and/or it does not discountenance pneumothorax it is a pederast. sent13: if the quadruplicate is not saprobic or it is not a kind of a tensiometer or both then it is apopemptic. sent14: that there is something such that if it is not a rubicelle or not a hunger or both then it does discountenance mainmast hold. sent15: the quadruplicate is apopemptic if it is not saprobic. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not saprobic then it is apopemptic. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a tissue and/or it is not a gigabyte it is a water. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__