the fact that the lapin is an impossibility and it reprises scrawniness does not hold.
sent1: the assemblyman does not reprise scrawniness if there is something such that the fact that it does acquit and does reprise Muscidae does not hold. sent2: if there is something such that that either it is a kind of an opium or it is not rental or both is incorrect the guttersnipe is a West. sent3: there exists something such that it is not an opium. sent4: the cuttlefish is not a kind of a rental. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a diphenylhydantoin then the placer is not an impossibility. sent6: that the guttersnipe does rut and/or does acquit is right if the assemblyman is not a Marduk. sent7: the brasserie is a bride if it is a breakax. sent8: the fact that the lapin is an impossibility and reprises scrawniness is false if the assemblyman does not reprises scrawniness. sent9: the brasserie reprises Muscidae if it is a kind of a bride. sent10: the fact that something is not a diphenylhydantoin and is a West is not right if it does not acquit. sent11: the cuttlefish is not a rut but a West. sent12: if the cuttlefish is both not a rut and a West the guttersnipe is not a West. sent13: if the placer is a diphenylhydantoin then that either the brasserie is an opium or it is not a kind of a rental or both does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the brasserie does not disown placer and is areal is not right it is a kind of a breakax. sent15: if the fact that something is a sunbeam but it is not a Diervilla is not true it is a Diervilla. sent16: the lapin does reprise scrawniness if the fact that the placer is not a kind of a diphenylhydantoin but it is a West is wrong. sent17: if that that the cuttlefish is a kind of a Marduk that disowns phrenology is false is not false then the fact that the assemblyman is not a kind of a Marduk hold. sent18: that the brasserie does not disown placer but it is areal does not hold. sent19: if the brasserie reprises Muscidae then the lapin is an impossibility.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the placer is a diphenylhydantoin.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: that the brasserie is either an opium or not rental or both is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an opium and/or it is not rental is incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the guttersnipe is a West is not wrong.; sent12 & sent11 -> int4: the guttersnipe is not a West.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the placer is not a diphenylhydantoin.;
the lapin is an impossibility and it does reprise scrawniness.
sent14 & sent18 -> int7: the fact that the brasserie is a breakax is not false.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the brasserie is a bride.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the brasserie reprises Muscidae.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the lapin is a kind of an impossibility.; sent10 -> int11: the fact that the placer is not a diphenylhydantoin but it is a West does not hold if it does not acquit.; sent15 -> int12: if that the blunderbuss is a sunbeam and is not a Diervilla does not hold it is a Diervilla.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the lapin is an impossibility and it reprises scrawniness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the assemblyman does not reprise scrawniness if there is something such that the fact that it does acquit and does reprise Muscidae does not hold. sent2: if there is something such that that either it is a kind of an opium or it is not rental or both is incorrect the guttersnipe is a West. sent3: there exists something such that it is not an opium. sent4: the cuttlefish is not a kind of a rental. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a diphenylhydantoin then the placer is not an impossibility. sent6: that the guttersnipe does rut and/or does acquit is right if the assemblyman is not a Marduk. sent7: the brasserie is a bride if it is a breakax. sent8: the fact that the lapin is an impossibility and reprises scrawniness is false if the assemblyman does not reprises scrawniness. sent9: the brasserie reprises Muscidae if it is a kind of a bride. sent10: the fact that something is not a diphenylhydantoin and is a West is not right if it does not acquit. sent11: the cuttlefish is not a rut but a West. sent12: if the cuttlefish is both not a rut and a West the guttersnipe is not a West. sent13: if the placer is a diphenylhydantoin then that either the brasserie is an opium or it is not a kind of a rental or both does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the brasserie does not disown placer and is areal is not right it is a kind of a breakax. sent15: if the fact that something is a sunbeam but it is not a Diervilla is not true it is a Diervilla. sent16: the lapin does reprise scrawniness if the fact that the placer is not a kind of a diphenylhydantoin but it is a West is wrong. sent17: if that that the cuttlefish is a kind of a Marduk that disowns phrenology is false is not false then the fact that the assemblyman is not a kind of a Marduk hold. sent18: that the brasserie does not disown placer but it is areal does not hold. sent19: if the brasserie reprises Muscidae then the lapin is an impossibility. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the placer is a diphenylhydantoin.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: that the brasserie is either an opium or not rental or both is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an opium and/or it is not rental is incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the guttersnipe is a West is not wrong.; sent12 & sent11 -> int4: the guttersnipe is not a West.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the placer is not a diphenylhydantoin.; __UNKNOWN__