the fact that the non-Jurassicness and the rational occurs hold.
sent1: the deputation occurs. sent2: the reclining favor happens. sent3: that the sweeping does not occur hold. sent4: that the interrogation does not occur and the rationalness occurs is triggered by that the sweep does not occur. sent5: if the deputation and the reclining favor happens the Jurassicness does not occur. sent6: if the deputation does not occur then the fact that the Jurassic does not occur but the rationalness occurs is not right. sent7: the interrogation does not occur. sent8: if the sweeping does not occur the interrogation does not occur.
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: both the deputation and the reclining favor happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the Jurassic does not occur is not incorrect.; sent4 & sent3 -> int3: the interrogation does not occur and the rational occurs.; int3 -> int4: the rationalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Jurassicness does not occur but the rationalness occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the non-Jurassicness and the rational occurs hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the deputation occurs. sent2: the reclining favor happens. sent3: that the sweeping does not occur hold. sent4: that the interrogation does not occur and the rationalness occurs is triggered by that the sweep does not occur. sent5: if the deputation and the reclining favor happens the Jurassicness does not occur. sent6: if the deputation does not occur then the fact that the Jurassic does not occur but the rationalness occurs is not right. sent7: the interrogation does not occur. sent8: if the sweeping does not occur the interrogation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: both the deputation and the reclining favor happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the Jurassic does not occur is not incorrect.; sent4 & sent3 -> int3: the interrogation does not occur and the rational occurs.; int3 -> int4: the rationalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__