the fact that the miro discharges is true.
sent1: the humectant is not a lilyturf and not a barrel if it is not a sovereignty. sent2: the fact that the humectant is a sovereignty but it is not a discharged is false if the miro is a kind of a sovereignty. sent3: if the fact that the secessionist is catadromous is not false the fact that that the traitress is catadromous and prances is not correct is true. sent4: if that the traitress is a kind of catadromous thing that does not prance does not hold then that the miro does discharge is correct. sent5: there is something such that it is a lilyturf. sent6: if something is a kind of a sovereignty then the fact that the humectant is not a sovereignty but a lilyturf is incorrect. sent7: the humectant does not barrel. sent8: that the miro is a discharged hold if the traitress does prance. sent9: the secessionist is not non-catadromous if the humectant is a sovereignty. sent10: the fact that the traitress is catadromous and it does prance is incorrect. sent11: the humectant is not a barrel if it is not a sovereignty. sent12: that the traitress is catadromous and does not prance is false if the secessionist is catadromous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the humectant is not a sovereignty.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the humectant is not a kind of a lilyturf and is not a barrel.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the miro discharges is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the humectant is not a lilyturf and not a barrel if it is not a sovereignty. sent2: the fact that the humectant is a sovereignty but it is not a discharged is false if the miro is a kind of a sovereignty. sent3: if the fact that the secessionist is catadromous is not false the fact that that the traitress is catadromous and prances is not correct is true. sent4: if that the traitress is a kind of catadromous thing that does not prance does not hold then that the miro does discharge is correct. sent5: there is something such that it is a lilyturf. sent6: if something is a kind of a sovereignty then the fact that the humectant is not a sovereignty but a lilyturf is incorrect. sent7: the humectant does not barrel. sent8: that the miro is a discharged hold if the traitress does prance. sent9: the secessionist is not non-catadromous if the humectant is a sovereignty. sent10: the fact that the traitress is catadromous and it does prance is incorrect. sent11: the humectant is not a barrel if it is not a sovereignty. sent12: that the traitress is catadromous and does not prance is false if the secessionist is catadromous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the humectant is not a sovereignty.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the humectant is not a kind of a lilyturf and is not a barrel.; __UNKNOWN__