the mallow does not brief mimosa or it is not a sharp or both.
sent1: that something is an absolution is not false if the fact that it is both not an absolution and not lobeliaceous is not correct. sent2: something is not a polypropylene and is not an attractiveness if it is an absolution. sent3: if the fact that something is not precocious is right then that it does not peruse misinformation and/or is not steep is not incorrect. sent4: the mallow briefs mimosa and/or it is not sharp. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does vacuum Wei and does not impinge deception is false then the nudist does not peruse Cambridge. sent6: the nudist is precocious. sent7: the fact that the nudist is a kind of an attractiveness is not false if the mexiletine is both not a polypropylene and not an attractiveness. sent8: that the fact that either something does not brief mimosa or it is not a sharp or both does not hold if it does not peruse misinformation is correct. sent9: if the nudist peruses misinformation the mallow is not an attractiveness but it does peruses misinformation. sent10: the mexiletine does not brief blaze if there exists something such that the fact that it is not adactylous and is not inedible is not true. sent11: the mallow peruses misinformation. sent12: something does not brief mimosa if it is not an attractiveness and does peruse misinformation. sent13: there exists nothing such that it is not a plastered but epenthetic. sent14: if something does not peruse Cambridge then it is precocious. sent15: the fact that something is both not an absolution and not lobeliaceous is false if it does not brief blaze. sent16: if the cataphyll is not epenthetic then the fact that it does vacuum Wei and it does not impinge deception is not true. sent17: there exists something such that that it is not adactylous and it is not inedible is wrong. sent18: something is not epenthetic if that it is not a plastered but epenthetic does not hold. sent19: something briefs mimosa if it is a kind of an attractiveness.
sent12 -> int1: the mallow does not brief mimosa if it is not an attractiveness and it peruses misinformation.;
that the mallow either does not brief mimosa or is not a sharp or both does not hold.
sent8 -> int2: that the fact that the mallow does not brief mimosa and/or is not a sharp is false is not wrong if it does not peruse misinformation.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the mexiletine is not an absolution and is not lobeliaceous is not correct it is an absolution.; sent15 -> int4: the fact that the mexiletine is not a kind of an absolution and it is not lobeliaceous is not correct if it does not brief blaze.; sent10 & sent17 -> int5: the mexiletine does not brief blaze.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the mexiletine is not an absolution and it is not lobeliaceous does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the mexiletine is an absolution.; sent2 -> int8: if the mexiletine is an absolution then it is not a polypropylene and is not an attractiveness.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the mexiletine is not a polypropylene and not an attractiveness.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the nudist is a kind of an attractiveness.; sent14 -> int11: the nudist is precocious if it does not peruse Cambridge.; sent13 -> int12: that that the pledger is not a plastered but it is epenthetic does not hold is not false.; sent18 -> int13: if the fact that the pledger is not a plastered but it is epenthetic is false then it is not epenthetic.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the pledger is not epenthetic.; int14 -> int15: everything is not epenthetic.; int15 -> int16: the cataphyll is not epenthetic.; int16 & sent16 -> int17: that the cataphyll vacuums Wei but it does not impinge deception does not hold.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that that it vacuums Wei and does not impinge deception is not true.; sent5 & int18 -> int19: the nudist does not peruse Cambridge.; int11 & int19 -> int20: the nudist is precocious.; int10 & int20 -> int21: the nudist is a kind of precocious thing that is an attractiveness.; int21 -> int22: there exists something such that it is precocious and it is an attractiveness.;
$hypothesis$ = the mallow does not brief mimosa or it is not a sharp or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is an absolution is not false if the fact that it is both not an absolution and not lobeliaceous is not correct. sent2: something is not a polypropylene and is not an attractiveness if it is an absolution. sent3: if the fact that something is not precocious is right then that it does not peruse misinformation and/or is not steep is not incorrect. sent4: the mallow briefs mimosa and/or it is not sharp. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does vacuum Wei and does not impinge deception is false then the nudist does not peruse Cambridge. sent6: the nudist is precocious. sent7: the fact that the nudist is a kind of an attractiveness is not false if the mexiletine is both not a polypropylene and not an attractiveness. sent8: that the fact that either something does not brief mimosa or it is not a sharp or both does not hold if it does not peruse misinformation is correct. sent9: if the nudist peruses misinformation the mallow is not an attractiveness but it does peruses misinformation. sent10: the mexiletine does not brief blaze if there exists something such that the fact that it is not adactylous and is not inedible is not true. sent11: the mallow peruses misinformation. sent12: something does not brief mimosa if it is not an attractiveness and does peruse misinformation. sent13: there exists nothing such that it is not a plastered but epenthetic. sent14: if something does not peruse Cambridge then it is precocious. sent15: the fact that something is both not an absolution and not lobeliaceous is false if it does not brief blaze. sent16: if the cataphyll is not epenthetic then the fact that it does vacuum Wei and it does not impinge deception is not true. sent17: there exists something such that that it is not adactylous and it is not inedible is wrong. sent18: something is not epenthetic if that it is not a plastered but epenthetic does not hold. sent19: something briefs mimosa if it is a kind of an attractiveness. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the mallow does not brief mimosa if it is not an attractiveness and it peruses misinformation.; __UNKNOWN__