the cubing occurs.
sent1: the viatication happens if the restarting poor does not occur but the Procrusteanness happens. sent2: the jumping does not occur but the hardening khesari occurs. sent3: if the ballisticness does not occur then the cubing happens and the improvement happens. sent4: either the non-ballisticness or that the improvement does not occur or both prevents that the jumping occurs. sent5: the fact that the Procrusteanness occurs but the restarting poor does not occur is not correct if the countercurrent does not occur. sent6: if the bryophyticness happens but the neglecting does not occur the countercurrent does not occur. sent7: the ballisticness occurs. sent8: the fact that the fact that the Procrusteanness and the restarting poor occurs is not true hold if the countercurrent does not occur. sent9: the restarting eleventh does not occur if the anhydrousness happens and the hardening spike happens. sent10: that the ballisticness occurs but the hardening extraversion does not occur does not hold if the flame-out occurs. sent11: that if the fact that the Procrusteanness and the restarting poor occurs is not correct then the Procrusteanness does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: the restarting poor does not occur and the Procrusteanness does not occur. sent13: the hardening extraversion occurs if the viatication occurs. sent14: the justice happens. sent15: the fact that the improvement occurs is right. sent16: if the restarting poor does not occur and the Procrusteanness does not occur then the viatication occurs. sent17: that the viatication happens is caused by that the restarting poor happens and the Procrusteanness does not occur. sent18: the unnaturalness happens. sent19: the flame-out is prevented by that the improvement happens and the ballisticness happens. sent20: that the flame-out does not occur but the hardening extraversion happens prevents the cubing.
sent15 & sent7 -> int1: that the improvement occurs and the ballisticness occurs is correct.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the flame-out does not occur is true.; sent16 & sent12 -> int3: the viatication happens.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the hardening extraversion occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the flame-out does not occur but the hardening extraversion occurs.; int5 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cubing happens is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the cubing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the viatication happens if the restarting poor does not occur but the Procrusteanness happens. sent2: the jumping does not occur but the hardening khesari occurs. sent3: if the ballisticness does not occur then the cubing happens and the improvement happens. sent4: either the non-ballisticness or that the improvement does not occur or both prevents that the jumping occurs. sent5: the fact that the Procrusteanness occurs but the restarting poor does not occur is not correct if the countercurrent does not occur. sent6: if the bryophyticness happens but the neglecting does not occur the countercurrent does not occur. sent7: the ballisticness occurs. sent8: the fact that the fact that the Procrusteanness and the restarting poor occurs is not true hold if the countercurrent does not occur. sent9: the restarting eleventh does not occur if the anhydrousness happens and the hardening spike happens. sent10: that the ballisticness occurs but the hardening extraversion does not occur does not hold if the flame-out occurs. sent11: that if the fact that the Procrusteanness and the restarting poor occurs is not correct then the Procrusteanness does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: the restarting poor does not occur and the Procrusteanness does not occur. sent13: the hardening extraversion occurs if the viatication occurs. sent14: the justice happens. sent15: the fact that the improvement occurs is right. sent16: if the restarting poor does not occur and the Procrusteanness does not occur then the viatication occurs. sent17: that the viatication happens is caused by that the restarting poor happens and the Procrusteanness does not occur. sent18: the unnaturalness happens. sent19: the flame-out is prevented by that the improvement happens and the ballisticness happens. sent20: that the flame-out does not occur but the hardening extraversion happens prevents the cubing. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent7 -> int1: that the improvement occurs and the ballisticness occurs is correct.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the flame-out does not occur is true.; sent16 & sent12 -> int3: the viatication happens.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the hardening extraversion occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the flame-out does not occur but the hardening extraversion occurs.; int5 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__