there exists something such that if that it staggers concrete and it is not unsystematic is false then it confines.
sent1: something does confine if the fact that it staggers concrete and is not unsystematic is not correct. sent2: the fact that something fails humbleness is not false if it is not a solver. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a stick and not agreeable is false then it is perianal. sent4: if the choc-ice does navigate but it is not a kind of a Sabaoth it staggers concrete. sent5: that the chess does stagger concrete if that the chess is a kind of a bride that is not a kind of a Ammotragus is false is correct. sent6: something is a Sabaoth if the fact that it does not bar Enhydra is correct.
sent1 -> int1: the choc-ice does confine if that it staggers concrete and it is not unsystematic is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it staggers concrete and it is not unsystematic is false then it confines. ; $context$ = sent1: something does confine if the fact that it staggers concrete and is not unsystematic is not correct. sent2: the fact that something fails humbleness is not false if it is not a solver. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a stick and not agreeable is false then it is perianal. sent4: if the choc-ice does navigate but it is not a kind of a Sabaoth it staggers concrete. sent5: that the chess does stagger concrete if that the chess is a kind of a bride that is not a kind of a Ammotragus is false is correct. sent6: something is a Sabaoth if the fact that it does not bar Enhydra is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the choc-ice does confine if that it staggers concrete and it is not unsystematic is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__