the baggage is not instrumental.
sent1: the bugle does not barbarize if the saddler is not a perplexity and it does not tin linebacker. sent2: the fact that the bugle does tin linebacker and/or it tins feeblemindedness is not wrong. sent3: if something does not barbarize then either it does tin feeblemindedness or it does efface bugle or both. sent4: either the baggage does barbarize or it is politics or both. sent5: the saddler is not a kind of a perplexity and it does not tin linebacker. sent6: if the bugle does tin feeblemindedness the salami is a cravat. sent7: if that the saddler does not barbarize is right then either it is a kind of a perplexity or it is politics or both. sent8: either the bugle does tin linebacker or it is a kind of a perplexity or both if it does not tin feeblemindedness. sent9: if the fact that something is politics hold it tins animalism. sent10: that the bugle does not barbarize is correct if the saddler is a perplexity that does not tin linebacker. sent11: if the fact that something tins animalism is not wrong then it is instrumental. sent12: there exists something such that that it tins boxer and is not a kind of a Parisian is not true. sent13: if there is something such that it does not tin animalism the salami is not politics. sent14: the saddler is not a kind of a perplexity. sent15: the baggage effaces Salian. sent16: if something does not tin animalism then it does tin linebacker or it is instrumental or both. sent17: the bugle is a perplexity if the saddler barbarizes. sent18: if the salami is a cravat it tins feeblemindedness. sent19: if the bugle effaces bugle then the salami is a cravat. sent20: the baggage is not a perplexity. sent21: if the bugle does not tin feeblemindedness the saddler does not barbarize and does efface bugle. sent22: the sunbeam does not tin animalism if the porbeagle is a kind of a Parisian and it is miscible. sent23: the porbeagle is a Parisian if there is something such that the fact that it tins boxer and is not a kind of a Parisian does not hold. sent24: the porbeagle is miscible. sent25: the baggage is politics if the salami is a cravat.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: that the bugle does not barbarize hold.; sent3 -> int2: if the bugle does not barbarize then either it tins feeblemindedness or it does efface bugle or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bugle tins feeblemindedness and/or effaces bugle.; int3 & sent6 & sent19 -> int4: that the salami is a cravat is right.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the baggage is politics.; sent9 -> int6: if the baggage is politics it does tin animalism.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the baggage does tin animalism.; sent11 -> int8: if the baggage does tin animalism then it is instrumental.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the baggage is not instrumental is right.
sent12 & sent23 -> int9: the porbeagle is a Parisian.; int9 & sent24 -> int10: the porbeagle is Parisian and it is miscible.; sent22 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the sunbeam does not tin animalism is right.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it does not tin animalism.; int12 & sent13 -> int13: the salami is not politics.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not politics.;
$hypothesis$ = the baggage is not instrumental. ; $context$ = sent1: the bugle does not barbarize if the saddler is not a perplexity and it does not tin linebacker. sent2: the fact that the bugle does tin linebacker and/or it tins feeblemindedness is not wrong. sent3: if something does not barbarize then either it does tin feeblemindedness or it does efface bugle or both. sent4: either the baggage does barbarize or it is politics or both. sent5: the saddler is not a kind of a perplexity and it does not tin linebacker. sent6: if the bugle does tin feeblemindedness the salami is a cravat. sent7: if that the saddler does not barbarize is right then either it is a kind of a perplexity or it is politics or both. sent8: either the bugle does tin linebacker or it is a kind of a perplexity or both if it does not tin feeblemindedness. sent9: if the fact that something is politics hold it tins animalism. sent10: that the bugle does not barbarize is correct if the saddler is a perplexity that does not tin linebacker. sent11: if the fact that something tins animalism is not wrong then it is instrumental. sent12: there exists something such that that it tins boxer and is not a kind of a Parisian is not true. sent13: if there is something such that it does not tin animalism the salami is not politics. sent14: the saddler is not a kind of a perplexity. sent15: the baggage effaces Salian. sent16: if something does not tin animalism then it does tin linebacker or it is instrumental or both. sent17: the bugle is a perplexity if the saddler barbarizes. sent18: if the salami is a cravat it tins feeblemindedness. sent19: if the bugle effaces bugle then the salami is a cravat. sent20: the baggage is not a perplexity. sent21: if the bugle does not tin feeblemindedness the saddler does not barbarize and does efface bugle. sent22: the sunbeam does not tin animalism if the porbeagle is a kind of a Parisian and it is miscible. sent23: the porbeagle is a Parisian if there is something such that the fact that it tins boxer and is not a kind of a Parisian does not hold. sent24: the porbeagle is miscible. sent25: the baggage is politics if the salami is a cravat. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: that the bugle does not barbarize hold.; sent3 -> int2: if the bugle does not barbarize then either it tins feeblemindedness or it does efface bugle or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bugle tins feeblemindedness and/or effaces bugle.; int3 & sent6 & sent19 -> int4: that the salami is a cravat is right.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the baggage is politics.; sent9 -> int6: if the baggage is politics it does tin animalism.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the baggage does tin animalism.; sent11 -> int8: if the baggage does tin animalism then it is instrumental.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__