there exists something such that if it is not meteoric the fact that that it does chirk and it incarnates is correct is not right.
sent1: the fact that the perithelium is purposeful and does set nudism is not true if it sexes. sent2: that something chirks and it does incarnate does not hold if it is meteoric. sent3: there is something such that if it is not meteoric it chirks and it does incarnate. sent4: there exists something such that if it is non-gemmiferous then that it is a searching and is a commensal is false. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a contents then it is a beach and macroeconomic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is terminological then the fact that it is a beach and is a jerboa is false. sent7: there is something such that if it is not syllogistic it is awnless and it does drone screenplay. sent8: that something chirks and it does incarnate does not hold if it is non-meteoric. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a trillium the fact that it does drone waxed and it is biographic is not right is not incorrect. sent10: if something is not a kind of a pachytene then it is a kind of a marathon and it is a panel.
sent8 -> int1: that the perithelium does chirk and it incarnates is not right if that it is not meteoric is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not meteoric the fact that that it does chirk and it incarnates is correct is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the perithelium is purposeful and does set nudism is not true if it sexes. sent2: that something chirks and it does incarnate does not hold if it is meteoric. sent3: there is something such that if it is not meteoric it chirks and it does incarnate. sent4: there exists something such that if it is non-gemmiferous then that it is a searching and is a commensal is false. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a contents then it is a beach and macroeconomic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is terminological then the fact that it is a beach and is a jerboa is false. sent7: there is something such that if it is not syllogistic it is awnless and it does drone screenplay. sent8: that something chirks and it does incarnate does not hold if it is non-meteoric. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a trillium the fact that it does drone waxed and it is biographic is not right is not incorrect. sent10: if something is not a kind of a pachytene then it is a kind of a marathon and it is a panel. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: that the perithelium does chirk and it incarnates is not right if that it is not meteoric is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__