the bottlebrush is prognathous thing that is not an assistant.
sent1: the fact that something originates but it does not debut president is wrong if it is not a kind of a buttocks. sent2: the Sassenach is iconic. sent3: if something is not anthropic that it is both a spatter and not prognathous is wrong. sent4: the farkleberry is not a kind of a Apia if something that does not furlough acatalectic is a ribaldry. sent5: the matchwood is not cytological and unpicks fug if there exists something such that it does furlough mayfly. sent6: if the bottlebrush is anthropic then the fact that it is prognathous thing that is an assistant is not correct. sent7: that the bottlebrush is prognathous and it is an assistant is false. sent8: the argon does not furlough acatalectic but it is a ribaldry if something is not cytological. sent9: the icon does furlough mayfly if there is something such that that it does not furlough mayfly and does not debut peach is false. sent10: if something is not a Apia then the fact that it either does not unpick adjunct or is not an adjudication or both does not hold. sent11: the bottlebrush is not anthropic if the fact that the divinity does originate but it does not debut president is false. sent12: if the farkleberry is a buttocks the photosphere debuts president. sent13: the bottlebrush is anthropic. sent14: that the ruddles is an assistant but it is not electronics is not correct. sent15: if the fact that the bottlebrush is anthropic hold then that it is both prognathous and not an assistant is wrong. sent16: if something is iconic then that it does not furlough mayfly and does not debut peach is not true. sent17: something is both prognathous and not an assistant if it is not anthropic. sent18: if the photosphere is not a Morley the divinity is non-salable thing that is not a buttocks. sent19: if the photosphere debuts president then the divinity does debuts president. sent20: that something is not anthropic and it does not originate is false if the fact that it does debut president is not false.
sent15 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the bottlebrush is a spatter but not prognathous is incorrect.
sent3 -> int1: that the bottlebrush is a kind of a spatter but it is not prognathous does not hold if it is not anthropic.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that that the divinity originates and does not debut president is not true is not incorrect if the fact that it is not a buttocks hold.; sent10 -> int3: if the farkleberry is not a Apia then the fact that it does not unpick adjunct or it is not an adjudication or both does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: the fact that the Sassenach does not furlough mayfly and it does not debut peach is incorrect if it is iconic.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the fact that the Sassenach does not furlough mayfly and does not debut peach is wrong is not wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it does not furlough mayfly and it does not debut peach is wrong.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the icon furloughs mayfly.; int7 -> int8: something furloughs mayfly.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the matchwood is not cytological but it does unpick fug.; int9 -> int10: the matchwood is not cytological.; int10 -> int11: something is not cytological.; int11 & sent8 -> int12: the argon does not furlough acatalectic and is a ribaldry.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it does not furlough acatalectic and is a kind of a ribaldry.; int13 & sent4 -> int14: the farkleberry is not a Apia.; int3 & int14 -> int15: that the farkleberry does not unpick adjunct and/or it is not an adjudication is incorrect.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it does not unpick adjunct or it is not an adjudication or both is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the bottlebrush is prognathous thing that is not an assistant. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something originates but it does not debut president is wrong if it is not a kind of a buttocks. sent2: the Sassenach is iconic. sent3: if something is not anthropic that it is both a spatter and not prognathous is wrong. sent4: the farkleberry is not a kind of a Apia if something that does not furlough acatalectic is a ribaldry. sent5: the matchwood is not cytological and unpicks fug if there exists something such that it does furlough mayfly. sent6: if the bottlebrush is anthropic then the fact that it is prognathous thing that is an assistant is not correct. sent7: that the bottlebrush is prognathous and it is an assistant is false. sent8: the argon does not furlough acatalectic but it is a ribaldry if something is not cytological. sent9: the icon does furlough mayfly if there is something such that that it does not furlough mayfly and does not debut peach is false. sent10: if something is not a Apia then the fact that it either does not unpick adjunct or is not an adjudication or both does not hold. sent11: the bottlebrush is not anthropic if the fact that the divinity does originate but it does not debut president is false. sent12: if the farkleberry is a buttocks the photosphere debuts president. sent13: the bottlebrush is anthropic. sent14: that the ruddles is an assistant but it is not electronics is not correct. sent15: if the fact that the bottlebrush is anthropic hold then that it is both prognathous and not an assistant is wrong. sent16: if something is iconic then that it does not furlough mayfly and does not debut peach is not true. sent17: something is both prognathous and not an assistant if it is not anthropic. sent18: if the photosphere is not a Morley the divinity is non-salable thing that is not a buttocks. sent19: if the photosphere debuts president then the divinity does debuts president. sent20: that something is not anthropic and it does not originate is false if the fact that it does debut president is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__