the geezer is hermeneutics.
sent1: that the moneywort is a recessional and it is a REIT is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that it is a REIT then the fact that the delf is not a kind of a payable is true. sent3: the fact that something is a humor and a telophase does not hold if it is not a kind of a payable. sent4: something is a telophase and is a Cuban if the fact that it is not a remuda is not false. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a recessional and is a REIT does not hold. sent6: that the moneywort is a kind of a recessional and it is a REIT does not hold if it is not a remuda. sent7: the fact that the moneywort is a recessional and is not a kind of a REIT is not right if it is not a remuda. sent8: if something is not a humor then that it is Cuban and is hermeneutics does not hold. sent9: the peeper is a kind of a Cuban. sent10: something is both recessional and not a REIT. sent11: the geezer is a telophase if the peeper is a telophase. sent12: if the peeper is not a remuda then the geezer is not a remuda. sent13: if the peeper is Cuban the moneywort is not a remuda. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a payable and it is not hermeneutics is false. sent15: the fact that the moneywort is a remuda but it is not a kind of a Cuban does not hold. sent16: if something is not a kind of a remuda that it is not hermeneutics and it is not a Cuban is incorrect. sent17: the delf is not a payable if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of recessional thing that is not a REIT is wrong. sent18: if the fact that the delf does humor and is a telophase does not hold the geezer is not hermeneutics. sent19: the peeper is not a payable. sent20: the peeper is not recessional if the fact that the moneywort is not non-Cuban and it is a payable does not hold. sent21: the geezer is non-hermeneutics if the delf is not a telophase. sent22: if the fact that something is not hermeneutics and it is not a kind of a Cuban is wrong it is hermeneutics. sent23: if something is not a payable then that it is recessional thing that is a kind of a REIT does not hold.
sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the moneywort is not a remuda.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the moneywort is a kind of a recessional and is not a REIT is not right.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is recessional thing that is not a REIT is incorrect.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the delf is not a payable.; sent3 -> int5: if that the delf is not a payable is not wrong the fact that it humors and it is a telophase does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the delf is a humor and a telophase is false.; int6 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the geezer is a telophase.
sent4 -> int7: if the peeper is not a kind of a remuda it is a telophase that is a kind of a Cuban.; sent23 -> int8: if the moneywort is not a payable that it is recessional and it is a kind of a REIT is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the geezer is hermeneutics. ; $context$ = sent1: that the moneywort is a recessional and it is a REIT is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that it is a REIT then the fact that the delf is not a kind of a payable is true. sent3: the fact that something is a humor and a telophase does not hold if it is not a kind of a payable. sent4: something is a telophase and is a Cuban if the fact that it is not a remuda is not false. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a recessional and is a REIT does not hold. sent6: that the moneywort is a kind of a recessional and it is a REIT does not hold if it is not a remuda. sent7: the fact that the moneywort is a recessional and is not a kind of a REIT is not right if it is not a remuda. sent8: if something is not a humor then that it is Cuban and is hermeneutics does not hold. sent9: the peeper is a kind of a Cuban. sent10: something is both recessional and not a REIT. sent11: the geezer is a telophase if the peeper is a telophase. sent12: if the peeper is not a remuda then the geezer is not a remuda. sent13: if the peeper is Cuban the moneywort is not a remuda. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a payable and it is not hermeneutics is false. sent15: the fact that the moneywort is a remuda but it is not a kind of a Cuban does not hold. sent16: if something is not a kind of a remuda that it is not hermeneutics and it is not a Cuban is incorrect. sent17: the delf is not a payable if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of recessional thing that is not a REIT is wrong. sent18: if the fact that the delf does humor and is a telophase does not hold the geezer is not hermeneutics. sent19: the peeper is not a payable. sent20: the peeper is not recessional if the fact that the moneywort is not non-Cuban and it is a payable does not hold. sent21: the geezer is non-hermeneutics if the delf is not a telophase. sent22: if the fact that something is not hermeneutics and it is not a kind of a Cuban is wrong it is hermeneutics. sent23: if something is not a payable then that it is recessional thing that is a kind of a REIT does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the moneywort is not a remuda.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the moneywort is a kind of a recessional and is not a REIT is not right.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is recessional thing that is not a REIT is incorrect.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the delf is not a payable.; sent3 -> int5: if that the delf is not a payable is not wrong the fact that it humors and it is a telophase does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the delf is a humor and a telophase is false.; int6 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__