there is something such that if it is not alphabetic the fact that it is a Melopsittacus and it is not apneic is wrong.
sent1: if the adder does not dehisce it is a lethargy and does not update Amarillo. sent2: if something is not a captain then that it is a spinnaker and is not a CST is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not alphabetic then it is a Melopsittacus and is not apneic. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not sparge Nimitz the fact that it is both insurrectional and intrauterine is not correct. sent5: that the adder is pregnant and is not a handhold is not right if that it is not apneic hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is alphabetic that it is both a Melopsittacus and not apneic is incorrect. sent7: if the gnu is not apneic it is a Odoacer and does not sparge colonizer. sent8: there is something such that if it does not update blowback then that it is a kind of re-entrant thing that is not a kind of a Alopex is not true. sent9: if something does not speak PVA it is a Washingtonian and it is not a underlip. sent10: that the adder is a Melopsittacus but it is not a kind of a osteoclast is not right if it is not non-yogistic. sent11: that something speaks keepsake and is not a Genevan does not hold if it is uterine. sent12: that something is both anapestic and not a captain is wrong if it is a Palmer. sent13: the fact that the fact that something is a Melopsittacus and apneic is not incorrect is not true if it is not alphabetic. sent14: that the adder is both a Melopsittacus and apneic is false if it is not alphabetic.
there is something such that if it does not captain then that it is a kind of a spinnaker and it is not a CST is false.
sent2 -> int1: if the carpetbag is not a captain then that it is a spinnaker and it is not a kind of a CST is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not alphabetic the fact that it is a Melopsittacus and it is not apneic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the adder does not dehisce it is a lethargy and does not update Amarillo. sent2: if something is not a captain then that it is a spinnaker and is not a CST is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not alphabetic then it is a Melopsittacus and is not apneic. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not sparge Nimitz the fact that it is both insurrectional and intrauterine is not correct. sent5: that the adder is pregnant and is not a handhold is not right if that it is not apneic hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is alphabetic that it is both a Melopsittacus and not apneic is incorrect. sent7: if the gnu is not apneic it is a Odoacer and does not sparge colonizer. sent8: there is something such that if it does not update blowback then that it is a kind of re-entrant thing that is not a kind of a Alopex is not true. sent9: if something does not speak PVA it is a Washingtonian and it is not a underlip. sent10: that the adder is a Melopsittacus but it is not a kind of a osteoclast is not right if it is not non-yogistic. sent11: that something speaks keepsake and is not a Genevan does not hold if it is uterine. sent12: that something is both anapestic and not a captain is wrong if it is a Palmer. sent13: the fact that the fact that something is a Melopsittacus and apneic is not incorrect is not true if it is not alphabetic. sent14: that the adder is both a Melopsittacus and apneic is false if it is not alphabetic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__