the fact that the interferometer is not non-isothermic but non-gustatory is not true.
sent1: the fact that the interferometer narrates laboratory and is not isothermic is not correct. sent2: the interferometer is a kind of a knife-edge. sent3: that the interferometer is isothermic thing that is gustatory is not correct. sent4: if the interferometer is a kind of a gruffness then it is gustatory. sent5: the interferometer is not gustatory. sent6: the fact that the fact that the wisent is a cordovan but it does not cutinize Adad is not false is not true. sent7: the fact that the interferometer is isothermic thing that is not gustatory is false if the gumwood is not a knife-edge. sent8: if the interferometer is a knife-edge then it is a kind of a walk-up. sent9: that the interferometer is not a walk-up is true if that it is isothermic thing that is not gustatory is false. sent10: the toner is a kind of a letters and is an ethnicity. sent11: that the interferometer is a kind of a knife-edge and is conquerable does not hold. sent12: the gumwood is not a knife-edge if that the Walker is not a walk-up and is not a schoolmarm is incorrect. sent13: if something is a kind of a milkman the fact that it is both not a walk-up and not a schoolmarm does not hold. sent14: the Walker is a milkman if the mine is a milkman. sent15: the interferometer is not a cirrocumulus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the interferometer is both isothermic and not gustatory does not hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the interferometer is not a kind of a walk-up is not incorrect.; sent8 & sent2 -> int2: the interferometer is a walk-up.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the interferometer is isothermic thing that is not gustatory is not right.
sent13 -> int4: the fact that that the Walker is not a kind of a walk-up and it is not the schoolmarm is not correct if the Walker is a milkman hold.; sent10 -> int5: the toner is a kind of a letters.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a letters.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the interferometer is not non-isothermic but non-gustatory is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the interferometer narrates laboratory and is not isothermic is not correct. sent2: the interferometer is a kind of a knife-edge. sent3: that the interferometer is isothermic thing that is gustatory is not correct. sent4: if the interferometer is a kind of a gruffness then it is gustatory. sent5: the interferometer is not gustatory. sent6: the fact that the fact that the wisent is a cordovan but it does not cutinize Adad is not false is not true. sent7: the fact that the interferometer is isothermic thing that is not gustatory is false if the gumwood is not a knife-edge. sent8: if the interferometer is a knife-edge then it is a kind of a walk-up. sent9: that the interferometer is not a walk-up is true if that it is isothermic thing that is not gustatory is false. sent10: the toner is a kind of a letters and is an ethnicity. sent11: that the interferometer is a kind of a knife-edge and is conquerable does not hold. sent12: the gumwood is not a knife-edge if that the Walker is not a walk-up and is not a schoolmarm is incorrect. sent13: if something is a kind of a milkman the fact that it is both not a walk-up and not a schoolmarm does not hold. sent14: the Walker is a milkman if the mine is a milkman. sent15: the interferometer is not a cirrocumulus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the interferometer is both isothermic and not gustatory does not hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the interferometer is not a kind of a walk-up is not incorrect.; sent8 & sent2 -> int2: the interferometer is a walk-up.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__