the nickel is a shark.
sent1: if the nickel is not a Hemiramphidae then the fact that it is not a treacle or is styleless or both does not hold. sent2: the sugar is not a kind of a Liederkranz. sent3: either something is not a Hemiramphidae or it caddies or both if it does not shark. sent4: the nickel is a Hemiramphidae or caddies or both. sent5: the fact that either something is not a Hemiramphidae or it is a caddie or both is wrong if it is not sedimentary. sent6: either something is not diabatic or it is a kasbah or both if it is not a kind of a Sphingidae. sent7: that something is not a shark and is not sedimentary does not hold if it is not a liftoff. sent8: something does yawp and is not a liftoff if it is annunciatory. sent9: if there is something such that it is a liftoff then the nickel is not sedimentary. sent10: there exists something such that that it does yawp and is not a kind of a liftoff does not hold. sent11: the fact that the Zinjanthropus does not unfasten or is a kind of a kwanza or both is false if the Muller does not shark. sent12: the fact that the nickel is not androgenic is not wrong. sent13: if something is not a kind of a strain then it is a scratch. sent14: the microtubule is an awe and it does gutter Alopius. sent15: something is anemophilous but it is non-autotelic. sent16: if something is not implicit then the fact that either it is not a almsgiver or it is a Boselaphus or both is not correct. sent17: the nickel is not sedimentary if there exists something such that that it does yawp and it is not a liftoff is not correct. sent18: the fact that the microtubule is annunciatory but it is not aperiodic is wrong if it does awe. sent19: the fact that something is either not a hang or autotelic or both does not hold if it is not molal. sent20: the Muller is annunciatory if that the fact that the microtubule is not annunciatory and not aperiodic hold is incorrect.
sent3 -> int1: if the nickel is not a shark it is not a Hemiramphidae or it is a caddie or both.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nickel is not a shark is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nickel is not a Hemiramphidae and/or is a caddie.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the nickel either is not a kind of a Hemiramphidae or is a caddie or both is incorrect if it is not sedimentary.; sent10 & sent17 -> int4: the nickel is not sedimentary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the nickel is not a Hemiramphidae and/or it does caddie is not correct.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Zinjanthropus does not unfasten and/or it is a kwanza is incorrect.
sent8 -> int7: the Muller yawps and is not a liftoff if it is annunciatory.; sent14 -> int8: the microtubule is an awe.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the microtubule is annunciatory but it is not aperiodic is false.; sent20 & int9 -> int10: the Muller is annunciatory.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the Muller yawps and is not a kind of a liftoff.; int11 -> int12: the Muller is not a kind of a liftoff.;
$hypothesis$ = the nickel is a shark. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nickel is not a Hemiramphidae then the fact that it is not a treacle or is styleless or both does not hold. sent2: the sugar is not a kind of a Liederkranz. sent3: either something is not a Hemiramphidae or it caddies or both if it does not shark. sent4: the nickel is a Hemiramphidae or caddies or both. sent5: the fact that either something is not a Hemiramphidae or it is a caddie or both is wrong if it is not sedimentary. sent6: either something is not diabatic or it is a kasbah or both if it is not a kind of a Sphingidae. sent7: that something is not a shark and is not sedimentary does not hold if it is not a liftoff. sent8: something does yawp and is not a liftoff if it is annunciatory. sent9: if there is something such that it is a liftoff then the nickel is not sedimentary. sent10: there exists something such that that it does yawp and is not a kind of a liftoff does not hold. sent11: the fact that the Zinjanthropus does not unfasten or is a kind of a kwanza or both is false if the Muller does not shark. sent12: the fact that the nickel is not androgenic is not wrong. sent13: if something is not a kind of a strain then it is a scratch. sent14: the microtubule is an awe and it does gutter Alopius. sent15: something is anemophilous but it is non-autotelic. sent16: if something is not implicit then the fact that either it is not a almsgiver or it is a Boselaphus or both is not correct. sent17: the nickel is not sedimentary if there exists something such that that it does yawp and it is not a liftoff is not correct. sent18: the fact that the microtubule is annunciatory but it is not aperiodic is wrong if it does awe. sent19: the fact that something is either not a hang or autotelic or both does not hold if it is not molal. sent20: the Muller is annunciatory if that the fact that the microtubule is not annunciatory and not aperiodic hold is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the nickel is not a shark it is not a Hemiramphidae or it is a caddie or both.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nickel is not a shark is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nickel is not a Hemiramphidae and/or is a caddie.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the nickel either is not a kind of a Hemiramphidae or is a caddie or both is incorrect if it is not sedimentary.; sent10 & sent17 -> int4: the nickel is not sedimentary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the nickel is not a Hemiramphidae and/or it does caddie is not correct.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__