there is something such that it is not a kind of a pyrostat and rolls naphtha.
sent1: that that the hackle is azimuthal and it is a pyrostat is not incorrect is false. sent2: if the nandrolone rolls naphtha then the fact that it is a Froebel is true. sent3: the fact that the cultivar is popliteal and it is a sweetleaf is not correct. sent4: something rolls cologne and is a syringe. sent5: that the hackle is a Plassey and azimuthal is incorrect. sent6: the hackle trucks Zu and/or is abundant. sent7: if the hackle is a pyrostat the nandrolone is azimuthal. sent8: the cultivar is a mainstay if the nandrolone is popliteal. sent9: the fact that the cultivar is not a kind of a mainstay hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Plassey and azimuthal is not true. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a Weizenbock. sent11: if that something is not a pyrostat and does roll naphtha does not hold it is popliteal. sent12: if something trucks Zu the fact that it is a mainstay is not wrong. sent13: the cultivar is not a sweetleaf if the hackle is both popliteal and a mainstay. sent14: the fact that the transport is a forestay that does not celebrate is not correct if it is a Housman. sent15: the cultivar is a mainstay if it is azimuthal. sent16: if the fact that something is not vicarial and is voltaic does not hold then it does roll hackle. sent17: the nandrolone is a mainstay if the fact that it is not azimuthal but popliteal is false. sent18: there exists something such that it cambers incurrence. sent19: something is insubordinate. sent20: the naphtha is a Plassey. sent21: the cultivar is a spud if that the transport is a forestay but it does not celebrate is not true. sent22: if something is not a kind of a Plassey that it is popliteal and it is azimuthal is not false. sent23: something is a kind of a mainstay if it is abundant.
sent11 -> int1: if the fact that the nandrolone is not a pyrostat and rolls naphtha is incorrect it is popliteal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nandrolone is not a pyrostat and does roll naphtha does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nandrolone is popliteal.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the cultivar is a mainstay.; sent5 -> int4: there is something such that that it is a Plassey and it is azimuthal is not true.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the cultivar is not a kind of a mainstay.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the nandrolone is not a pyrostat and does roll naphtha.; int7 -> hypothesis;
something is not a sweetleaf but it does spud.
sent22 -> int8: the hackle is not non-popliteal and not non-azimuthal if it is not a Plassey.; sent12 -> int9: the hackle is a mainstay if it trucks Zu.; sent23 -> int10: if the hackle is abundant then it is a mainstay.; sent6 & int9 & int10 -> int11: the hackle is a mainstay.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not a kind of a pyrostat and rolls naphtha. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the hackle is azimuthal and it is a pyrostat is not incorrect is false. sent2: if the nandrolone rolls naphtha then the fact that it is a Froebel is true. sent3: the fact that the cultivar is popliteal and it is a sweetleaf is not correct. sent4: something rolls cologne and is a syringe. sent5: that the hackle is a Plassey and azimuthal is incorrect. sent6: the hackle trucks Zu and/or is abundant. sent7: if the hackle is a pyrostat the nandrolone is azimuthal. sent8: the cultivar is a mainstay if the nandrolone is popliteal. sent9: the fact that the cultivar is not a kind of a mainstay hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Plassey and azimuthal is not true. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a Weizenbock. sent11: if that something is not a pyrostat and does roll naphtha does not hold it is popliteal. sent12: if something trucks Zu the fact that it is a mainstay is not wrong. sent13: the cultivar is not a sweetleaf if the hackle is both popliteal and a mainstay. sent14: the fact that the transport is a forestay that does not celebrate is not correct if it is a Housman. sent15: the cultivar is a mainstay if it is azimuthal. sent16: if the fact that something is not vicarial and is voltaic does not hold then it does roll hackle. sent17: the nandrolone is a mainstay if the fact that it is not azimuthal but popliteal is false. sent18: there exists something such that it cambers incurrence. sent19: something is insubordinate. sent20: the naphtha is a Plassey. sent21: the cultivar is a spud if that the transport is a forestay but it does not celebrate is not true. sent22: if something is not a kind of a Plassey that it is popliteal and it is azimuthal is not false. sent23: something is a kind of a mainstay if it is abundant. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the fact that the nandrolone is not a pyrostat and rolls naphtha is incorrect it is popliteal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nandrolone is not a pyrostat and does roll naphtha does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nandrolone is popliteal.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the cultivar is a mainstay.; sent5 -> int4: there is something such that that it is a Plassey and it is azimuthal is not true.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the cultivar is not a kind of a mainstay.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the nandrolone is not a pyrostat and does roll naphtha.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__