that there is something such that if it is inhumane and it is jittery then it does not capitalize is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is Balzacian and a bicycle-built-for-two it is a deodar. sent2: if the blush is jittery and it is a kind of a deodar it is not a hydroelectricity. sent3: there is something such that if it damps Austria and is salivary then it does not mummify intransigency. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a lagoon and damps pinguecula then it is a bayou. sent5: there exists something such that if it is both a Turkish and Ibsenian then the fact that it does not mummify deposit hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it mummifies androsterone and it is prandial then the fact that it does not damp alphabet is not incorrect. sent7: if an inhumane thing does roll dragonfly it is not a Krasner. sent8: something that damps Austria and does hee-haw is not a kind of a Oryctolagus. sent9: there is something such that if it is inviolable and a steeple then it does not teeter. sent10: the blush does not capitalize if the fact that it is inhumane and it is jittery hold. sent11: the blush does not swallow if it is jittery and it is a confirmation. sent12: something is not a creamery if it is ductless and it is a Krasner. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both admissible and cheliceral then it is a tamarack. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a camel and it is protestant then that it damps Austria hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is both inexhaustible and a player then it does not roll dragonfly. sent16: if the blush does mummify isostasy and it is jittery then it is a kind of a Ryukyuan. sent17: there exists something such that if it is inhumane and is jittery it does capitalize. sent18: the blush does capitalize if it is inhumane and it is jittery.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is ductless and is a Krasner it is not a creamery.
sent12 -> int1: if the torus is ductless and is a Krasner then it is not a creamery.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is inhumane and it is jittery then it does not capitalize is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is Balzacian and a bicycle-built-for-two it is a deodar. sent2: if the blush is jittery and it is a kind of a deodar it is not a hydroelectricity. sent3: there is something such that if it damps Austria and is salivary then it does not mummify intransigency. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a lagoon and damps pinguecula then it is a bayou. sent5: there exists something such that if it is both a Turkish and Ibsenian then the fact that it does not mummify deposit hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it mummifies androsterone and it is prandial then the fact that it does not damp alphabet is not incorrect. sent7: if an inhumane thing does roll dragonfly it is not a Krasner. sent8: something that damps Austria and does hee-haw is not a kind of a Oryctolagus. sent9: there is something such that if it is inviolable and a steeple then it does not teeter. sent10: the blush does not capitalize if the fact that it is inhumane and it is jittery hold. sent11: the blush does not swallow if it is jittery and it is a confirmation. sent12: something is not a creamery if it is ductless and it is a Krasner. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both admissible and cheliceral then it is a tamarack. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a camel and it is protestant then that it damps Austria hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is both inexhaustible and a player then it does not roll dragonfly. sent16: if the blush does mummify isostasy and it is jittery then it is a kind of a Ryukyuan. sent17: there exists something such that if it is inhumane and is jittery it does capitalize. sent18: the blush does capitalize if it is inhumane and it is jittery. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__