the barbasco does variegate precipice.
sent1: that the damask is astrophysical and a monotone is not correct if the surveyor does not variegate ardor. sent2: the sateen does not gall browallia if the damask is a monotone and it does gall browallia. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is aeromechanics thing that does gall browallia does not hold the browallia is not a saurian. sent4: the fact that the sateen is a kind of non-aeromechanics thing that does not gall browallia is not correct if the phosphorescence is not unalert. sent5: the fact that the sateen is aeromechanics thing that galls browallia is false if there exists something such that it variegates precipice. sent6: if either the surveyor is not a rounding or it is avionics or both that it does not variegate ardor is not wrong. sent7: the damask is a monotone that galls browallia. sent8: if there is something such that it is avionics the surveyor is not a rounding and/or it is avionics. sent9: if the sateen is non-reverse or it is a saurian or both then the barbasco does not variegate precipice. sent10: if something galls browallia then it variegates precipice. sent11: something is not a surf if the fact that it is both a monotone and not a subtrahend is not correct. sent12: the sateen is not aeromechanics if that it is a kind of a reverse and/or is a saurian is not correct. sent13: the sateen is not aeromechanics if the fact that it is non-reverse or it is a kind of a saurian or both is not true. sent14: the sateen is reverse or is a saurian or both. sent15: the phosphorescence is not unalert. sent16: that the damask does gall browallia is not incorrect. sent17: something is avionics. sent18: the phosphorescence is not a monotone if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of astrophysical a monotone is not correct. sent19: the barbasco does variegate precipice and it is unalert if it is not a surf. sent20: that the sateen is reverse is not wrong. sent21: the barbasco does not variegate precipice if the sateen is not reverse.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the sateen is not a reverse or it is a saurian or both does not hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the sateen is not aeromechanics.; sent2 & sent7 -> int2: the sateen does not gall browallia.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sateen is a kind of non-aeromechanics thing that does not gall browallia.; sent4 & sent15 -> int4: that the sateen is not aeromechanics and it does not gall browallia is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sateen is not a kind of a reverse or is a kind of a saurian or both.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the barbasco variegates precipice is right.
sent10 -> int7: the barbasco variegates precipice if it galls browallia.;
$hypothesis$ = the barbasco does variegate precipice. ; $context$ = sent1: that the damask is astrophysical and a monotone is not correct if the surveyor does not variegate ardor. sent2: the sateen does not gall browallia if the damask is a monotone and it does gall browallia. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is aeromechanics thing that does gall browallia does not hold the browallia is not a saurian. sent4: the fact that the sateen is a kind of non-aeromechanics thing that does not gall browallia is not correct if the phosphorescence is not unalert. sent5: the fact that the sateen is aeromechanics thing that galls browallia is false if there exists something such that it variegates precipice. sent6: if either the surveyor is not a rounding or it is avionics or both that it does not variegate ardor is not wrong. sent7: the damask is a monotone that galls browallia. sent8: if there is something such that it is avionics the surveyor is not a rounding and/or it is avionics. sent9: if the sateen is non-reverse or it is a saurian or both then the barbasco does not variegate precipice. sent10: if something galls browallia then it variegates precipice. sent11: something is not a surf if the fact that it is both a monotone and not a subtrahend is not correct. sent12: the sateen is not aeromechanics if that it is a kind of a reverse and/or is a saurian is not correct. sent13: the sateen is not aeromechanics if the fact that it is non-reverse or it is a kind of a saurian or both is not true. sent14: the sateen is reverse or is a saurian or both. sent15: the phosphorescence is not unalert. sent16: that the damask does gall browallia is not incorrect. sent17: something is avionics. sent18: the phosphorescence is not a monotone if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of astrophysical a monotone is not correct. sent19: the barbasco does variegate precipice and it is unalert if it is not a surf. sent20: that the sateen is reverse is not wrong. sent21: the barbasco does not variegate precipice if the sateen is not reverse. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the sateen is not a reverse or it is a saurian or both does not hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the sateen is not aeromechanics.; sent2 & sent7 -> int2: the sateen does not gall browallia.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sateen is a kind of non-aeromechanics thing that does not gall browallia.; sent4 & sent15 -> int4: that the sateen is not aeromechanics and it does not gall browallia is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sateen is not a kind of a reverse or is a kind of a saurian or both.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__