that there is something such that it is obtrusive and it is a kind of a commemorative is correct.
sent1: if the rowan is not a kind of a comet and it is not oviparous it is a Corallorhiza. sent2: the anchovy is both not a Leuciscus and not a roper. sent3: the bather is not a Opera. sent4: the anchovy is a kind of a disembowelment. sent5: if the bather is not a kind of a Opera then that it is not a kind of a minimalism and is not acanthotic is false. sent6: if something is not a comet and it is not a kind of a dynamic it is not non-commemorative. sent7: the Velcro is a kind of a disembowelment if it is not a kind of a Inconel and it does overrun. sent8: if the anchovy is a kind of a disembowelment the bather is not a comet and is not a dynamic. sent9: if the fact that something is not a minimalism and is not acanthotic is false the fact that it is not unobtrusive hold.
sent6 -> int1: the bather is commemorative if it is not a comet but undynamic.; sent8 & sent4 -> int2: the bather is not a comet and it is not a dynamic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bather is a commemorative.; sent9 -> int4: if the fact that the bather is not a kind of a minimalism and is not acanthotic is false it is obtrusive.; sent5 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the bather is not a minimalism and it is not acanthotic is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bather is obtrusive.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the bather is obtrusive and it is commemorative.; int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that it is obtrusive and it is a kind of a commemorative is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rowan is not a kind of a comet and it is not oviparous it is a Corallorhiza. sent2: the anchovy is both not a Leuciscus and not a roper. sent3: the bather is not a Opera. sent4: the anchovy is a kind of a disembowelment. sent5: if the bather is not a kind of a Opera then that it is not a kind of a minimalism and is not acanthotic is false. sent6: if something is not a comet and it is not a kind of a dynamic it is not non-commemorative. sent7: the Velcro is a kind of a disembowelment if it is not a kind of a Inconel and it does overrun. sent8: if the anchovy is a kind of a disembowelment the bather is not a comet and is not a dynamic. sent9: if the fact that something is not a minimalism and is not acanthotic is false the fact that it is not unobtrusive hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the bather is commemorative if it is not a comet but undynamic.; sent8 & sent4 -> int2: the bather is not a comet and it is not a dynamic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bather is a commemorative.; sent9 -> int4: if the fact that the bather is not a kind of a minimalism and is not acanthotic is false it is obtrusive.; sent5 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the bather is not a minimalism and it is not acanthotic is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bather is obtrusive.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the bather is obtrusive and it is commemorative.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__