that the snuff is both meatless and not common is incorrect.
sent1: the asclepiad is homiletics but it does not frolic mobocracy if the wardress does not officialize Nicholas. sent2: if the asclepiad is common then that the snuff is meatless but it is not common is incorrect. sent3: if the asclepiad is homiletics but it does not frolic mobocracy it is common. sent4: the Winchester is meatless. sent5: if the wardress does frolic colorimetry it does not officialize Nicholas. sent6: the thrift does not rail if there exists something such that it does not frolic colorimetry. sent7: the thrift is a rail.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wardress does not frolic colorimetry.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it does not frolic colorimetry.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the thrift is not a rail.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the wardress does frolic colorimetry.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the wardress does not officialize Nicholas.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the asclepiad is homiletics but it does not frolic mobocracy.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the asclepiad is common.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the snuff is both meatless and not common is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the asclepiad is homiletics but it does not frolic mobocracy if the wardress does not officialize Nicholas. sent2: if the asclepiad is common then that the snuff is meatless but it is not common is incorrect. sent3: if the asclepiad is homiletics but it does not frolic mobocracy it is common. sent4: the Winchester is meatless. sent5: if the wardress does frolic colorimetry it does not officialize Nicholas. sent6: the thrift does not rail if there exists something such that it does not frolic colorimetry. sent7: the thrift is a rail. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wardress does not frolic colorimetry.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it does not frolic colorimetry.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the thrift is not a rail.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the wardress does frolic colorimetry.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the wardress does not officialize Nicholas.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the asclepiad is homiletics but it does not frolic mobocracy.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the asclepiad is common.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__