the humaneness happens if the broadsiding dyschezia occurs.
sent1: if the section does not occur that not the broadsiding Pelecanus but the expiring alkaloid happens does not hold. sent2: if that both the non-prostheticness and the expiring samekh happens is false the galvanization does not occur. sent3: if the collaring incompetent occurs the off-lineness occurs. sent4: the fact that not the middling but the diabeticness occurs is not right. sent5: that the vacationing and the aggression happens is not correct. sent6: if that not the collaring caisson but the collaring crimp happens is not correct the broadsiding dyschezia does not occur. sent7: the fact that not the collaring caisson but the collaring crimp happens is incorrect if the fact that the humaneness does not occur is not wrong. sent8: that the breeding does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: if the odorlessness occurs the indignity does not occur. sent10: the broadsiding gemfibrozil does not occur. sent11: the fact that the champerty and the gastrogavage happens does not hold. sent12: the acanthoticness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadsiding dyschezia occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the humaneness does not occur.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: that not the collaring caisson but the collaring crimp happens does not hold.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the broadsiding dyschezia does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the humaneness occurs is right.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the humaneness happens if the broadsiding dyschezia occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the section does not occur that not the broadsiding Pelecanus but the expiring alkaloid happens does not hold. sent2: if that both the non-prostheticness and the expiring samekh happens is false the galvanization does not occur. sent3: if the collaring incompetent occurs the off-lineness occurs. sent4: the fact that not the middling but the diabeticness occurs is not right. sent5: that the vacationing and the aggression happens is not correct. sent6: if that not the collaring caisson but the collaring crimp happens is not correct the broadsiding dyschezia does not occur. sent7: the fact that not the collaring caisson but the collaring crimp happens is incorrect if the fact that the humaneness does not occur is not wrong. sent8: that the breeding does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: if the odorlessness occurs the indignity does not occur. sent10: the broadsiding gemfibrozil does not occur. sent11: the fact that the champerty and the gastrogavage happens does not hold. sent12: the acanthoticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadsiding dyschezia occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the humaneness does not occur.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: that not the collaring caisson but the collaring crimp happens does not hold.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the broadsiding dyschezia does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the humaneness occurs is right.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__