that there is something such that it is both not greenside and incongruent is incorrect.
sent1: something does not pleach exhilaration but it is a shellfire if it does not render padauk. sent2: something is a Dactylorhiza. sent3: there exists something such that it is incongruent. sent4: everything either is not a kind of a Eburophyton or does not render cased or both. sent5: the dirt is a aphasic and it is a surtout. sent6: the dirt is a surtout. sent7: the limpet is obstetrics. sent8: the limpet is obstetrics and it is incongruent. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a Dactylorhiza either the dirt is incongruent or it is a kind of a Dactylorhiza or both. sent10: if something does not pleach exhilaration it is a ilium and it is a kind of a aphasic. sent11: that the padauk renders padauk is wrong if it does not render cased. sent12: if there exists something such that it is aphasic thing that is greenside the zinfandel is not a Dactylorhiza. sent13: if the padauk is not a Eburophyton it does not render padauk. sent14: the padauk is not greenside if the dirt is incongruent. sent15: the dirt is incongruent if the limpet is incongruent. sent16: the zinfandel is a kind of a Dactylorhiza that does pleach exhilaration. sent17: something is not greenside. sent18: the zinfandel pleaches exhilaration. sent19: something is obstetrics and is a surtout if it is not greenside.
sent5 -> int1: the dirt is not non-aphasic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dirt is greenside.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dirt is not non-aphasic but greenside.; int2 -> int3: something is a kind of a aphasic and it is greenside.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the zinfandel is not a kind of a Dactylorhiza.; sent16 -> int5: the zinfandel is a Dactylorhiza.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the dirt is not greenside.; sent8 -> int8: the limpet is incongruent.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the dirt is incongruent.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the dirt is not greenside but it is incongruent.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the padauk is a ilium and it is obstetrics.
sent10 -> int11: if the padauk does not pleach exhilaration then it is a kind of a ilium that is a aphasic.; sent1 -> int12: the padauk does not pleach exhilaration but it is a shellfire if it does not render padauk.; sent4 -> int13: the padauk is not a kind of a Eburophyton or it does not render cased or both.; int13 & sent13 & sent11 -> int14: that the padauk does not render padauk is not wrong.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the padauk does not pleach exhilaration but it is a shellfire.; int15 -> int16: the padauk does not pleach exhilaration.; int11 & int16 -> int17: the padauk is a ilium and not non-aphasic.; int17 -> int18: that the padauk is a ilium is not wrong.; sent19 -> int19: if the padauk is non-greenside then it is both obstetrics and a surtout.; sent2 & sent9 -> int20: the dirt is incongruent or it is a kind of a Dactylorhiza or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that it is both not greenside and incongruent is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not pleach exhilaration but it is a shellfire if it does not render padauk. sent2: something is a Dactylorhiza. sent3: there exists something such that it is incongruent. sent4: everything either is not a kind of a Eburophyton or does not render cased or both. sent5: the dirt is a aphasic and it is a surtout. sent6: the dirt is a surtout. sent7: the limpet is obstetrics. sent8: the limpet is obstetrics and it is incongruent. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a Dactylorhiza either the dirt is incongruent or it is a kind of a Dactylorhiza or both. sent10: if something does not pleach exhilaration it is a ilium and it is a kind of a aphasic. sent11: that the padauk renders padauk is wrong if it does not render cased. sent12: if there exists something such that it is aphasic thing that is greenside the zinfandel is not a Dactylorhiza. sent13: if the padauk is not a Eburophyton it does not render padauk. sent14: the padauk is not greenside if the dirt is incongruent. sent15: the dirt is incongruent if the limpet is incongruent. sent16: the zinfandel is a kind of a Dactylorhiza that does pleach exhilaration. sent17: something is not greenside. sent18: the zinfandel pleaches exhilaration. sent19: something is obstetrics and is a surtout if it is not greenside. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the dirt is not non-aphasic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dirt is greenside.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dirt is not non-aphasic but greenside.; int2 -> int3: something is a kind of a aphasic and it is greenside.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the zinfandel is not a kind of a Dactylorhiza.; sent16 -> int5: the zinfandel is a Dactylorhiza.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the dirt is not greenside.; sent8 -> int8: the limpet is incongruent.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the dirt is incongruent.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the dirt is not greenside but it is incongruent.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__