the ossuary is not a scoreboard.
sent1: there exists something such that it does not rally frill. sent2: the frill is unfavorable. sent3: the used-car does not tool sandhi. sent4: the used-car is not a kind of a touchdown. sent5: the used-car is not a Lesbian if something does not tool sandhi and does snuffle stannite. sent6: the fact that the flagfish is a Lesbian is true if there is something such that it is handless. sent7: The sandhi does not tool used-car. sent8: the flagfish is a scoreboard. sent9: the used-car is not a kind of a scoreboard if there exists something such that it is not a touchdown and it does snuffle stannite. sent10: the ossuary is not a kind of a scoreboard if that something is not a Alisma but it is a Lesbian is not incorrect. sent11: if there is something such that it is a kind of a touchdown then the frill is not a Lesbian and does tool sandhi. sent12: if there exists something such that it does tool sandhi then the used-car is a scoreboard. sent13: that the flagfish does rally mentality is true. sent14: the frill is both not a Alisma and a Lesbian if there exists something such that it is a Hupa. sent15: the fact that the flagfish is not a kind of a Alisma but it is a Hupa is correct if there exists something such that it is a Lesbian. sent16: if there is something such that it tools sandhi the used-car does not snuffle stannite but it is a scoreboard. sent17: the ossuary is not a Alisma. sent18: that something is not a touchdown and does not tool sandhi is not right if it does not snuffle stannite. sent19: the frill is not a kind of a touchdown.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flagfish is not a Hupa.; sent18 -> int1: if the used-car does not snuffle stannite that it is not a touchdown and does not tool sandhi is not correct.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the used-car is not a touchdown and does not tool sandhi.;
$hypothesis$ = the ossuary is not a scoreboard. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does not rally frill. sent2: the frill is unfavorable. sent3: the used-car does not tool sandhi. sent4: the used-car is not a kind of a touchdown. sent5: the used-car is not a Lesbian if something does not tool sandhi and does snuffle stannite. sent6: the fact that the flagfish is a Lesbian is true if there is something such that it is handless. sent7: The sandhi does not tool used-car. sent8: the flagfish is a scoreboard. sent9: the used-car is not a kind of a scoreboard if there exists something such that it is not a touchdown and it does snuffle stannite. sent10: the ossuary is not a kind of a scoreboard if that something is not a Alisma but it is a Lesbian is not incorrect. sent11: if there is something such that it is a kind of a touchdown then the frill is not a Lesbian and does tool sandhi. sent12: if there exists something such that it does tool sandhi then the used-car is a scoreboard. sent13: that the flagfish does rally mentality is true. sent14: the frill is both not a Alisma and a Lesbian if there exists something such that it is a Hupa. sent15: the fact that the flagfish is not a kind of a Alisma but it is a Hupa is correct if there exists something such that it is a Lesbian. sent16: if there is something such that it tools sandhi the used-car does not snuffle stannite but it is a scoreboard. sent17: the ossuary is not a Alisma. sent18: that something is not a touchdown and does not tool sandhi is not right if it does not snuffle stannite. sent19: the frill is not a kind of a touchdown. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flagfish is not a Hupa.; sent18 -> int1: if the used-car does not snuffle stannite that it is not a touchdown and does not tool sandhi is not correct.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the used-car is not a touchdown and does not tool sandhi.; __UNKNOWN__