the fact that there exists something such that if it does not dilate aunt then it is a kind of a stridulation and is not a kind of a downside is not right.
sent1: something is a rubato if the fact that it is a stridulation and it is a downside does not hold. sent2: something dilates aunt if it is a rubato. sent3: the Guernsey is a rubato if it is exhaustible and it is not a kind of a Pseudowintera. sent4: if the aunt is not a gibbsite it is a downside and a counteroffensive. sent5: the aunt is a downside. sent6: there is something such that if it does not dilate aunt then the fact that it is a stridulation is correct. sent7: something is harsh if it is oncological. sent8: if that the aunt is both a stridulation and a downside is false then it is a kind of a rubato. sent9: if the fact that something is a kind of intraventricular thing that is not creedal is not true then it drills. sent10: the aunt is a stridulation and it is a downside. sent11: the aunt scissors. sent12: the fact that something is not a fixative hold if it does not dilate aunt. sent13: if that something is a stridulation that is not a downside is false then it is a rubato.
sent13 -> int1: the aunt is a rubato if that it is a stridulation that is not a downside is not right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the fact that the aunt is a kind of a stridulation that is not a downside is not wrong does not hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the aunt is a rubato.; sent2 -> int3: the aunt does dilate aunt if it is a kind of a rubato.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the aunt does dilate aunt.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the aunt does not dilate aunt is not false.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the aunt is a stridulation but not a downside.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: if the aunt does not dilate aunt then it is a stridulation and it is not a downside.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the aunt is a fixative that does not blunt louvar is wrong.
sent12 -> int8: the slippage is not a fixative if it does not dilate aunt.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not dilate aunt then it is a kind of a stridulation and is not a kind of a downside is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a rubato if the fact that it is a stridulation and it is a downside does not hold. sent2: something dilates aunt if it is a rubato. sent3: the Guernsey is a rubato if it is exhaustible and it is not a kind of a Pseudowintera. sent4: if the aunt is not a gibbsite it is a downside and a counteroffensive. sent5: the aunt is a downside. sent6: there is something such that if it does not dilate aunt then the fact that it is a stridulation is correct. sent7: something is harsh if it is oncological. sent8: if that the aunt is both a stridulation and a downside is false then it is a kind of a rubato. sent9: if the fact that something is a kind of intraventricular thing that is not creedal is not true then it drills. sent10: the aunt is a stridulation and it is a downside. sent11: the aunt scissors. sent12: the fact that something is not a fixative hold if it does not dilate aunt. sent13: if that something is a stridulation that is not a downside is false then it is a rubato. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the aunt is a rubato if that it is a stridulation that is not a downside is not right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the fact that the aunt is a kind of a stridulation that is not a downside is not wrong does not hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the aunt is a rubato.; sent2 -> int3: the aunt does dilate aunt if it is a kind of a rubato.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the aunt does dilate aunt.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the aunt does not dilate aunt is not false.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the aunt is a stridulation but not a downside.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: if the aunt does not dilate aunt then it is a stridulation and it is not a downside.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__