that there exists something such that that it is not a bowls hold does not hold.
sent1: if something is a Blenniidae it is orthodontic. sent2: if there is something such that it is a kind of a fell that is orthodontic then the fact that the highboy is not a soundman hold. sent3: the splitter is a kind of a odontoglossum and/or it is not a bowler. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a bowler. sent5: if the highboy is not a soundman the splitter is a soundman. sent6: the splitter is either a odontoglossum or a bowler or both. sent7: something does bend splitter if it is oncological. sent8: if the splitter is a kind of a odontoglossum or it is not a bowler or both then it is a Blenniidae. sent9: there is something such that it is a fell. sent10: if the highboy is not a soundman the pueblo is not a kind of a bowls. sent11: something is orthodontic. sent12: if something is a kind of a deformity it is a fell. sent13: if something bends pueblo then it is a blackfly. sent14: something is a bowls. sent15: the smelter does condole Galveston if that it is not a Langtry is not right. sent16: there is something such that it does not condole legislation. sent17: the fact that the highboy is not a bowler is correct if the splitter is not a soundman. sent18: the Primus does fall. sent19: if that the splitter is not a bowler is true the fact that it is a Blenniidae is not false. sent20: if something condoles highboy then it bends pulverization. sent21: there exists something such that it is both a rash and unemotional. sent22: the smelter is not a deformity. sent23: the splitter is a deformity if the smelter is not a deformity. sent24: the pueblo is a soundman. sent25: either the globalization condoles highboy or it is not a kind of a Blenniidae or both.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: that the splitter is a kind of a Blenniidae is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int2: the splitter is not non-orthodontic if it is a Blenniidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the splitter is orthodontic.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the splitter is a deformity is not false it is a kind of a fell.; sent23 & sent22 -> int5: the splitter is a kind of a deformity.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the splitter is a fell.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the splitter falls and it is orthodontic.; int7 -> int8: something is a fell and orthodontic.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the highboy is not a kind of a soundman.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the pueblo is not a bowls.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that that it is not a bowls hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Blenniidae it is orthodontic. sent2: if there is something such that it is a kind of a fell that is orthodontic then the fact that the highboy is not a soundman hold. sent3: the splitter is a kind of a odontoglossum and/or it is not a bowler. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a bowler. sent5: if the highboy is not a soundman the splitter is a soundman. sent6: the splitter is either a odontoglossum or a bowler or both. sent7: something does bend splitter if it is oncological. sent8: if the splitter is a kind of a odontoglossum or it is not a bowler or both then it is a Blenniidae. sent9: there is something such that it is a fell. sent10: if the highboy is not a soundman the pueblo is not a kind of a bowls. sent11: something is orthodontic. sent12: if something is a kind of a deformity it is a fell. sent13: if something bends pueblo then it is a blackfly. sent14: something is a bowls. sent15: the smelter does condole Galveston if that it is not a Langtry is not right. sent16: there is something such that it does not condole legislation. sent17: the fact that the highboy is not a bowler is correct if the splitter is not a soundman. sent18: the Primus does fall. sent19: if that the splitter is not a bowler is true the fact that it is a Blenniidae is not false. sent20: if something condoles highboy then it bends pulverization. sent21: there exists something such that it is both a rash and unemotional. sent22: the smelter is not a deformity. sent23: the splitter is a deformity if the smelter is not a deformity. sent24: the pueblo is a soundman. sent25: either the globalization condoles highboy or it is not a kind of a Blenniidae or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: that the splitter is a kind of a Blenniidae is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int2: the splitter is not non-orthodontic if it is a Blenniidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the splitter is orthodontic.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the splitter is a deformity is not false it is a kind of a fell.; sent23 & sent22 -> int5: the splitter is a kind of a deformity.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the splitter is a fell.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the splitter falls and it is orthodontic.; int7 -> int8: something is a fell and orthodontic.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the highboy is not a kind of a soundman.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the pueblo is not a bowls.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__