the loge is a techno.
sent1: that the nighthawk is both ulnar and not a single-leaf does not hold if the spray is a thrall. sent2: the spray is a techno if there exists something such that that it is not coherent and it is ulnar does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of coherent thing that is not non-ulnar does not hold. sent4: the spray is a techno if there exists something such that it is not ulnar. sent5: the loge is not a thrall. sent6: if the fact that something is ulnar but it is not a single-leaf is false then it is not ulnar. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is not ulnar but a thrall is incorrect then the nighthawk is a kind of a techno. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not boot predomination is right the fact that the nighthawk is both not coherent and ulnar is false. sent9: there is something such that it boots predomination. sent10: there is something such that that it is both not a techno and a thrall does not hold. sent11: if the spray is a techno then the loge is not a thrall. sent12: that the loge is not a techno and is coherent is not true if something is not a kind of a thrall. sent13: if something is not ulnar then that it is coherent is true. sent14: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Babylonian. sent15: the fact that there is something such that it does not boot predomination is correct. sent16: the spray is a thrall if it is not a Entebbe and is a commemorative. sent17: the view is both not a techno and not coherent. sent18: there are incoherent and ulnar things. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is not coherent and it is a thrall is wrong. sent20: the loge is both not a techno and not a thrall if the spray is a techno. sent21: the fact that the nighthawk is non-pancreatic thing that is a Dictaphone is not true if the spray boots predomination.
sent15 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the nighthawk is both not coherent and ulnar is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is both incoherent and not non-ulnar is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the spray is a kind of a techno.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the loge is not a techno and is not a thrall.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the loge is a techno.
sent13 -> int5: if the nighthawk is not ulnar then that it is coherent is correct.; sent6 -> int6: the nighthawk is not ulnar if that it is a kind of ulnar thing that is not a single-leaf is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the loge is a techno. ; $context$ = sent1: that the nighthawk is both ulnar and not a single-leaf does not hold if the spray is a thrall. sent2: the spray is a techno if there exists something such that that it is not coherent and it is ulnar does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of coherent thing that is not non-ulnar does not hold. sent4: the spray is a techno if there exists something such that it is not ulnar. sent5: the loge is not a thrall. sent6: if the fact that something is ulnar but it is not a single-leaf is false then it is not ulnar. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is not ulnar but a thrall is incorrect then the nighthawk is a kind of a techno. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not boot predomination is right the fact that the nighthawk is both not coherent and ulnar is false. sent9: there is something such that it boots predomination. sent10: there is something such that that it is both not a techno and a thrall does not hold. sent11: if the spray is a techno then the loge is not a thrall. sent12: that the loge is not a techno and is coherent is not true if something is not a kind of a thrall. sent13: if something is not ulnar then that it is coherent is true. sent14: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Babylonian. sent15: the fact that there is something such that it does not boot predomination is correct. sent16: the spray is a thrall if it is not a Entebbe and is a commemorative. sent17: the view is both not a techno and not coherent. sent18: there are incoherent and ulnar things. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is not coherent and it is a thrall is wrong. sent20: the loge is both not a techno and not a thrall if the spray is a techno. sent21: the fact that the nighthawk is non-pancreatic thing that is a Dictaphone is not true if the spray boots predomination. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the nighthawk is both not coherent and ulnar is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is both incoherent and not non-ulnar is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the spray is a kind of a techno.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the loge is not a techno and is not a thrall.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__