the concha does not impoverish.
sent1: the concha is not a quintal if it does not impoverish. sent2: The concha does mask concha. sent3: something that sensualizes certiorari does not sensualize Orlando. sent4: something is non-rheologic thing that impoverishes if it is life-support. sent5: something is a kind of a Penobscot if it does not bawl bolus. sent6: that something does not impoverish is not false if that it does not sensualize Orlando is true. sent7: if the lighting is a Penobscot then the cyberpunk is life-support. sent8: if the concha does sensualize certiorari then it does not sensualize Orlando. sent9: if something does mask concha and/or it sensualizes certiorari it does not sensualize Orlando. sent10: if either the concha masks concha or it is a dick or both then it does not mask hideousness. sent11: the concha does mask concha. sent12: everything sensualizes vacationer. sent13: the bolus is not a kind of a yips if it is not a Polynesian. sent14: if the fact that the plantlet sensualizes vacationer is true then the mangabey is not nativist and not taxable. sent15: that the fact that something does not impoverish or it does not sensualize Orlando or both is not incorrect is false if it is rheologic. sent16: if there is something such that it is not nativist and it is not taxable then the lighting does not bawl bolus.
sent9 -> int1: if the concha either masks concha or does sensualize certiorari or both then it does not sensualize Orlando.; sent11 -> int2: the concha does mask concha and/or it sensualizes certiorari.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the concha does not sensualize Orlando.; sent6 -> int4: the concha does not impoverish if the fact that it does not sensualize Orlando hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fucoid does not sensualize Orlando.
sent4 -> int5: the cyberpunk is a kind of non-rheologic thing that does impoverish if it is not non-life-support.; sent5 -> int6: the lighting is a Penobscot if it does not bawl bolus.; sent12 -> int7: the plantlet sensualizes vacationer.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the mangabey is a kind of non-nativist thing that is not taxable.; int8 -> int9: there are non-nativist and non-taxable things.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the lighting does not bawl bolus.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the lighting is a Penobscot.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the cyberpunk is life-support.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the cyberpunk is not rheologic but it does impoverish.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not rheologic and impoverishes.;
$hypothesis$ = the concha does not impoverish. ; $context$ = sent1: the concha is not a quintal if it does not impoverish. sent2: The concha does mask concha. sent3: something that sensualizes certiorari does not sensualize Orlando. sent4: something is non-rheologic thing that impoverishes if it is life-support. sent5: something is a kind of a Penobscot if it does not bawl bolus. sent6: that something does not impoverish is not false if that it does not sensualize Orlando is true. sent7: if the lighting is a Penobscot then the cyberpunk is life-support. sent8: if the concha does sensualize certiorari then it does not sensualize Orlando. sent9: if something does mask concha and/or it sensualizes certiorari it does not sensualize Orlando. sent10: if either the concha masks concha or it is a dick or both then it does not mask hideousness. sent11: the concha does mask concha. sent12: everything sensualizes vacationer. sent13: the bolus is not a kind of a yips if it is not a Polynesian. sent14: if the fact that the plantlet sensualizes vacationer is true then the mangabey is not nativist and not taxable. sent15: that the fact that something does not impoverish or it does not sensualize Orlando or both is not incorrect is false if it is rheologic. sent16: if there is something such that it is not nativist and it is not taxable then the lighting does not bawl bolus. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the concha either masks concha or does sensualize certiorari or both then it does not sensualize Orlando.; sent11 -> int2: the concha does mask concha and/or it sensualizes certiorari.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the concha does not sensualize Orlando.; sent6 -> int4: the concha does not impoverish if the fact that it does not sensualize Orlando hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__