the spectating cardiospasm does not occur.
sent1: if that the thrombosing logarithm does not occur and the hate occurs does not hold the remit does not occur. sent2: if the spectating cardiospasm happens the topiary but not the looping occurs. sent3: the fact that the thrombosing logarithm does not occur and the remit does not occur does not hold if the adnexalness does not occur. sent4: the wastefulness happens. sent5: that the topiary occurs and the looping happens is not right. sent6: if the remit does not occur and the wastefulness does not occur then the spectating cardiospasm happens. sent7: if the wastefulness does not occur then the fact that the spectating cardiospasm and the slop happens is correct. sent8: the puncturableness does not occur. sent9: if the wastefulness occurs that the topiary but not the looping happens is not right. sent10: if that the thrombosing logarithm does not occur and the remit does not occur does not hold then the remit happens. sent11: if the thrombosing yakuza occurs then the thrombosing logarithm occurs and the screech does not occur. sent12: if the remit happens then the wastefulness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectating cardiospasm occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the topiary but not the loop occurs.; sent9 & sent4 -> int2: that the topiary occurs but the looping does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the spectating cardiospasm occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the spectating cardiospasm does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the thrombosing logarithm does not occur and the hate occurs does not hold the remit does not occur. sent2: if the spectating cardiospasm happens the topiary but not the looping occurs. sent3: the fact that the thrombosing logarithm does not occur and the remit does not occur does not hold if the adnexalness does not occur. sent4: the wastefulness happens. sent5: that the topiary occurs and the looping happens is not right. sent6: if the remit does not occur and the wastefulness does not occur then the spectating cardiospasm happens. sent7: if the wastefulness does not occur then the fact that the spectating cardiospasm and the slop happens is correct. sent8: the puncturableness does not occur. sent9: if the wastefulness occurs that the topiary but not the looping happens is not right. sent10: if that the thrombosing logarithm does not occur and the remit does not occur does not hold then the remit happens. sent11: if the thrombosing yakuza occurs then the thrombosing logarithm occurs and the screech does not occur. sent12: if the remit happens then the wastefulness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectating cardiospasm occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the topiary but not the loop occurs.; sent9 & sent4 -> int2: that the topiary occurs but the looping does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__