the caramel blinds.
sent1: the caramel defoliates coprolite. sent2: something is a Aramaic that is unlivable. sent3: the fact that something that is a beep and is a kind of a Celastraceae is not a kind of a blind is true. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not indistinct the insectivore does not defoliate coprolite. sent5: something is not non-blind and it is a barrier if it is not a retreatant. sent6: if something is not Aramaic then the insectivore is a retreatant. sent7: the pelvimeter is not indistinct. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Aramaic that is unlivable does not hold then the insectivore is a retreatant. sent9: the caramel is a Celastraceae. sent10: the fact that the caramel is Aramaic and is unlivable is not correct if it is not a barrier. sent11: the fact that the insectivore does not defoliate coprolite hold. sent12: there is something such that it is indistinct. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not indistinct the insectivore is not a retreatant and does not defoliate coprolite. sent14: something that is a barrier beeps.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the caramel is not a kind of a barrier is not incorrect.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the caramel is Aramaic thing that is unlivable is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Aramaic and it is unlivable does not hold.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the insectivore is a retreatant.; sent7 -> int4: something is distinct.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the insectivore is not a retreatant and it does not defoliate coprolite.; int5 -> int6: the insectivore is not a retreatant.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the caramel is a barrier.; sent14 -> int9: the caramel is a beep if the fact that it is a barrier is correct.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the caramel is a beep.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the caramel beeps and it is a Celastraceae.; sent3 -> int12: if the caramel is both a beep and a Celastraceae then it does not blind.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the caramel is a blind.
sent5 -> int13: if the caramel is not a retreatant then it is both not non-blind and a barrier.;
$hypothesis$ = the caramel blinds. ; $context$ = sent1: the caramel defoliates coprolite. sent2: something is a Aramaic that is unlivable. sent3: the fact that something that is a beep and is a kind of a Celastraceae is not a kind of a blind is true. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not indistinct the insectivore does not defoliate coprolite. sent5: something is not non-blind and it is a barrier if it is not a retreatant. sent6: if something is not Aramaic then the insectivore is a retreatant. sent7: the pelvimeter is not indistinct. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Aramaic that is unlivable does not hold then the insectivore is a retreatant. sent9: the caramel is a Celastraceae. sent10: the fact that the caramel is Aramaic and is unlivable is not correct if it is not a barrier. sent11: the fact that the insectivore does not defoliate coprolite hold. sent12: there is something such that it is indistinct. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not indistinct the insectivore is not a retreatant and does not defoliate coprolite. sent14: something that is a barrier beeps. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the caramel is not a kind of a barrier is not incorrect.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the caramel is Aramaic thing that is unlivable is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Aramaic and it is unlivable does not hold.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the insectivore is a retreatant.; sent7 -> int4: something is distinct.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the insectivore is not a retreatant and it does not defoliate coprolite.; int5 -> int6: the insectivore is not a retreatant.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the caramel is a barrier.; sent14 -> int9: the caramel is a beep if the fact that it is a barrier is correct.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the caramel is a beep.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the caramel beeps and it is a Celastraceae.; sent3 -> int12: if the caramel is both a beep and a Celastraceae then it does not blind.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__