the fact that there exists something such that if it seams Akron it is cortico-hypothalamic is right.
sent1: something does not seam Akron if it is non-present and it is a kind of a abetment. sent2: the Hart does not seam Akron if it is a kind of non-present a abetment. sent3: if something that is not a present is not a abetment it does not seam Akron. sent4: something is cortico-hypothalamic if it is a abetment. sent5: the fact that the Hart is not a present but it is a kind of a abetment does not hold. sent6: something is cortico-hypothalamic if the fact that it is not a present and is not a abetment does not hold. sent7: the Hart does bargain confinement if the fact that the feverfew does bargain confinement and does not seam Akron does not hold. sent8: the fact that something bargains confinement and does not seam Akron does not hold if it is not cortico-hypothalamic. sent9: the Hart is not a abetment. sent10: the Hart does seam Akron if it is not present and not a abetment. sent11: the Hart is not non-cortico-hypothalamic if it is a kind of a abetment. sent12: there is something such that if it is spiritualistic then it is a barnburner. sent13: something seams Akron if it is non-present thing that is not a kind of a abetment.
sent3 -> int1: the Hart does not seam Akron if it is not a kind of a present and it is not a abetment.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Hart is not a present and is not a abetment.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the Hart does not seam Akron.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Hart seams Akron is not incorrect.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Hart is both not a present and not a abetment is wrong.; sent6 -> int5: the Hart is cortico-hypothalamic if that it is not a kind of a present and it is not a abetment does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Hart is cortico-hypothalamic.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: if the fact that the Hart seams Akron is right then it is cortico-hypothalamic.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the Hart does bargain confinement.
sent8 -> int8: the fact that the feverfew does bargain confinement but it does not seam Akron is false if it is not cortico-hypothalamic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it seams Akron it is cortico-hypothalamic is right. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not seam Akron if it is non-present and it is a kind of a abetment. sent2: the Hart does not seam Akron if it is a kind of non-present a abetment. sent3: if something that is not a present is not a abetment it does not seam Akron. sent4: something is cortico-hypothalamic if it is a abetment. sent5: the fact that the Hart is not a present but it is a kind of a abetment does not hold. sent6: something is cortico-hypothalamic if the fact that it is not a present and is not a abetment does not hold. sent7: the Hart does bargain confinement if the fact that the feverfew does bargain confinement and does not seam Akron does not hold. sent8: the fact that something bargains confinement and does not seam Akron does not hold if it is not cortico-hypothalamic. sent9: the Hart is not a abetment. sent10: the Hart does seam Akron if it is not present and not a abetment. sent11: the Hart is not non-cortico-hypothalamic if it is a kind of a abetment. sent12: there is something such that if it is spiritualistic then it is a barnburner. sent13: something seams Akron if it is non-present thing that is not a kind of a abetment. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the Hart does not seam Akron if it is not a kind of a present and it is not a abetment.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Hart is not a present and is not a abetment.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the Hart does not seam Akron.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Hart seams Akron is not incorrect.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Hart is both not a present and not a abetment is wrong.; sent6 -> int5: the Hart is cortico-hypothalamic if that it is not a kind of a present and it is not a abetment does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Hart is cortico-hypothalamic.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: if the fact that the Hart seams Akron is right then it is cortico-hypothalamic.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__