the fact that the fact that the junction is not zymoid and it is not an equipment is not correct hold.
sent1: the blunderbuss peruses parasailing if it is Trojan thing that does not titrate. sent2: the fact that the Lister does not peruse parasailing and is not a kind of a Trojan is not correct if there is something such that it peruse parasailing. sent3: the Lister does peruse parasailing and is a kind of a Trojan. sent4: that the Lister is an equipment but it does not peruse parasailing does not hold. sent5: the blunderbuss is a tenderloin if it is an assault. sent6: if the fact that the blunderbuss is not a kind of a pike-perch and it does not titrate is true it is an assault. sent7: the Lister is not a pike-perch. sent8: if something that peruses parasailing is Trojan the blunderbuss is not a tenderloin. sent9: if the propellant is a rubberneck then the outdoorsman peruses parasailing. sent10: the blunderbuss is not a streamer and it is not a kind of an equipment if the junction is a Trojan. sent11: the junction is not zymoid and it is not an equipment if the blunderbuss is a streamer. sent12: something that is not an assault and/or is not a kind of a tenderloin is a kind of an equipment. sent13: the propellant is a rubberneck. sent14: something is a streamer if that it is not a pike-perch and does not titrate is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blunderbuss is not a pike-perch and does not titrate is right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the blunderbuss is an assault is true.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the blunderbuss is a tenderloin is right.; sent3 -> int3: something does peruse parasailing and it is Trojan.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the blunderbuss is not a kind of a tenderloin.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the blunderbuss is not a pike-perch and it does not titrate does not hold.; sent14 -> int7: if that the fact that the fact that the blunderbuss is not a pike-perch and does not titrate is true is incorrect is true then it is a streamer.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the blunderbuss is a kind of a streamer.; int8 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the junction is both non-zymoid and not an equipment is incorrect.
sent12 -> int9: the blunderbuss is a kind of an equipment if it is not an assault and/or it is not a tenderloin.; sent9 & sent13 -> int10: the outdoorsman does peruse parasailing.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it does peruse parasailing.; int11 & sent2 -> int12: the fact that that the Lister does not peruse parasailing and is not a Trojan does not hold hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the junction is not zymoid and it is not an equipment is not correct hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the blunderbuss peruses parasailing if it is Trojan thing that does not titrate. sent2: the fact that the Lister does not peruse parasailing and is not a kind of a Trojan is not correct if there is something such that it peruse parasailing. sent3: the Lister does peruse parasailing and is a kind of a Trojan. sent4: that the Lister is an equipment but it does not peruse parasailing does not hold. sent5: the blunderbuss is a tenderloin if it is an assault. sent6: if the fact that the blunderbuss is not a kind of a pike-perch and it does not titrate is true it is an assault. sent7: the Lister is not a pike-perch. sent8: if something that peruses parasailing is Trojan the blunderbuss is not a tenderloin. sent9: if the propellant is a rubberneck then the outdoorsman peruses parasailing. sent10: the blunderbuss is not a streamer and it is not a kind of an equipment if the junction is a Trojan. sent11: the junction is not zymoid and it is not an equipment if the blunderbuss is a streamer. sent12: something that is not an assault and/or is not a kind of a tenderloin is a kind of an equipment. sent13: the propellant is a rubberneck. sent14: something is a streamer if that it is not a pike-perch and does not titrate is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blunderbuss is not a pike-perch and does not titrate is right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the blunderbuss is an assault is true.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the blunderbuss is a tenderloin is right.; sent3 -> int3: something does peruse parasailing and it is Trojan.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the blunderbuss is not a kind of a tenderloin.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the blunderbuss is not a pike-perch and it does not titrate does not hold.; sent14 -> int7: if that the fact that the fact that the blunderbuss is not a pike-perch and does not titrate is true is incorrect is true then it is a streamer.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the blunderbuss is a kind of a streamer.; int8 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__