the abnegator does preempt Gidar.
sent1: the abnegator is a demurrage if the psychrometer does exceed hassle. sent2: if the clarinetist is not a limiting that the psychrometer does exceed hassle is right. sent3: if the abnegator is a hansom it does preempt Gidar. sent4: that the abnegator exceeds hassle but it does not limit does not hold if it is not a demurrage. sent5: the clarinetist does not limit if something that does not claim is not an amyloid. sent6: something is not a claim and it is not a kind of an amyloid. sent7: if something is a kind of a demurrage then it is a hansom.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the clarinetist is not a kind of a limiting.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the psychrometer does exceed hassle is right.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the abnegator is a demurrage.; sent7 -> int4: if the abnegator is a kind of a demurrage it is a hansom.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the abnegator is a hansom.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the abnegator does not preempt Gidar.
$hypothesis$ = the abnegator does preempt Gidar. ; $context$ = sent1: the abnegator is a demurrage if the psychrometer does exceed hassle. sent2: if the clarinetist is not a limiting that the psychrometer does exceed hassle is right. sent3: if the abnegator is a hansom it does preempt Gidar. sent4: that the abnegator exceeds hassle but it does not limit does not hold if it is not a demurrage. sent5: the clarinetist does not limit if something that does not claim is not an amyloid. sent6: something is not a claim and it is not a kind of an amyloid. sent7: if something is a kind of a demurrage then it is a hansom. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the clarinetist is not a kind of a limiting.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the psychrometer does exceed hassle is right.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the abnegator is a demurrage.; sent7 -> int4: if the abnegator is a kind of a demurrage it is a hansom.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the abnegator is a hansom.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__