the traction but not the rustlessness occurs.
sent1: that the traction but not the rustlessness happens is triggered by that the ringing does not occur. sent2: if the articulateness does not occur that the parody but not the signal occurs does not hold. sent3: that the hieratic and the chasteness happens is not correct. sent4: if both the alertness and the short happens then the rings does not occur. sent5: the articulateness does not occur. sent6: the tincturing squareness does not occur if that the parody but not the signal occurs is not right. sent7: that the redecorating ore happens and the inelegantness does not occur does not hold if the asyndeticness does not occur. sent8: the nonsurgicalness happens if the fact that the alertness and the shortness occurs does not hold. sent9: the tincturing squareness occurs if the nonsurgicalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the non-unalertness and the shortness happens is not true.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the nonsurgicalness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the tincturing squareness happens is not false.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: that the parody but not the signal occurs is false.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the tincturing squareness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: both the alertness and the short occurs.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the ringing does not occur.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
that both the traction and the rustedness happens is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the traction but not the rustlessness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the traction but not the rustlessness happens is triggered by that the ringing does not occur. sent2: if the articulateness does not occur that the parody but not the signal occurs does not hold. sent3: that the hieratic and the chasteness happens is not correct. sent4: if both the alertness and the short happens then the rings does not occur. sent5: the articulateness does not occur. sent6: the tincturing squareness does not occur if that the parody but not the signal occurs is not right. sent7: that the redecorating ore happens and the inelegantness does not occur does not hold if the asyndeticness does not occur. sent8: the nonsurgicalness happens if the fact that the alertness and the shortness occurs does not hold. sent9: the tincturing squareness occurs if the nonsurgicalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the non-unalertness and the shortness happens is not true.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the nonsurgicalness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the tincturing squareness happens is not false.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: that the parody but not the signal occurs is false.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the tincturing squareness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: both the alertness and the short occurs.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the ringing does not occur.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__