the sunglass is not a must.
sent1: the fondue is a kind of a succinylcholine if the icefall is a Montfort. sent2: that the icefall does socialize productiveness and is a kind of a Montfort is not incorrect. sent3: if the tetranychid is not a kind of a spawn the icefall is a succinylcholine but it is not a victimizer. sent4: everything is not avascular. sent5: if the leucothoe is not avascular then the fondue is not a microspore but a expansiveness. sent6: the fondue is not a kind of a succinylcholine if the leucothoe is a victimizer and it is a lycopene. sent7: if that the sunglass is non-avascular thing that is a lycopene does not hold then the leucothoe is not avascular. sent8: that something is a kind of non-field-crop thing that is not Tajikistani is false if it is not avascular. sent9: that if the leucothoe does not spawn and it is not a lycopene then the sunglass is not a kind of a must hold. sent10: everything does not spawn and it is a kind of a Armenian.
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the hypnagogue is both not field-crop and non-Tajikistani is not true if it is not avascular.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the hypnagogue is not avascular is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hypnagogue is not field-crop and it is not Tajikistani is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leucothoe is a kind of a lycopene.; sent2 -> int4: the icefall is a kind of a Montfort.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the fondue is a succinylcholine.; sent10 -> int6: the leucothoe is not a spawn and is Armenian.; int6 -> int7: the leucothoe does not spawn.;
the fondue is not a microspore but it is a expansiveness.
$hypothesis$ = the sunglass is not a must. ; $context$ = sent1: the fondue is a kind of a succinylcholine if the icefall is a Montfort. sent2: that the icefall does socialize productiveness and is a kind of a Montfort is not incorrect. sent3: if the tetranychid is not a kind of a spawn the icefall is a succinylcholine but it is not a victimizer. sent4: everything is not avascular. sent5: if the leucothoe is not avascular then the fondue is not a microspore but a expansiveness. sent6: the fondue is not a kind of a succinylcholine if the leucothoe is a victimizer and it is a lycopene. sent7: if that the sunglass is non-avascular thing that is a lycopene does not hold then the leucothoe is not avascular. sent8: that something is a kind of non-field-crop thing that is not Tajikistani is false if it is not avascular. sent9: that if the leucothoe does not spawn and it is not a lycopene then the sunglass is not a kind of a must hold. sent10: everything does not spawn and it is a kind of a Armenian. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the hypnagogue is both not field-crop and non-Tajikistani is not true if it is not avascular.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the hypnagogue is not avascular is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hypnagogue is not field-crop and it is not Tajikistani is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leucothoe is a kind of a lycopene.; sent2 -> int4: the icefall is a kind of a Montfort.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the fondue is a succinylcholine.; sent10 -> int6: the leucothoe is not a spawn and is Armenian.; int6 -> int7: the leucothoe does not spawn.; __UNKNOWN__