that the combine is not praetorian and not monozygotic is not incorrect if the incendiary is aplacental.
sent1: there is nothing such that it is non-baboonish thing that is not a kind of a stretcher. sent2: the combine is not praetorian and it is not monozygotic if the intron is praetorian. sent3: if something is not bacchantic then the fact that it is not a quadratic and it is not a auriculare is not right. sent4: the incendiary is bacchantic if that the obstetrician is both not baboonish and not a stretcher is not true. sent5: if the obstetrician is a stretcher that the incendiary is bacchantic is correct.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the obstetrician is not baboonish and it is not a stretcher is not correct.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the incendiary is bacchantic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incendiary is aplacental.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the incendiary is bacchantic and it is aplacental.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is bacchantic and it is aplacental.;
the fact that the fact that the incendiary is a kind of non-quadratic thing that is not a auriculare is true is not correct.
sent3 -> int5: the fact that the incendiary is not a kind of a quadratic and is not a auriculare does not hold if it is not bacchantic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the combine is not praetorian and not monozygotic is not incorrect if the incendiary is aplacental. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that it is non-baboonish thing that is not a kind of a stretcher. sent2: the combine is not praetorian and it is not monozygotic if the intron is praetorian. sent3: if something is not bacchantic then the fact that it is not a quadratic and it is not a auriculare is not right. sent4: the incendiary is bacchantic if that the obstetrician is both not baboonish and not a stretcher is not true. sent5: if the obstetrician is a stretcher that the incendiary is bacchantic is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the obstetrician is not baboonish and it is not a stretcher is not correct.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the incendiary is bacchantic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incendiary is aplacental.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the incendiary is bacchantic and it is aplacental.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is bacchantic and it is aplacental.; __UNKNOWN__