the chuck rouses.
sent1: that something mounts and is an example is not true if it does not die. sent2: something does not dropkick gulag and/or it is a fourpence. sent3: the rings does startle coalition and it is puncturable if it is not a Maginot. sent4: the keeper is not a mount if there is something such that the fact that it is a mount and it is a kind of an example is false. sent5: something does rouse if it is puncturable and is not a mount. sent6: the weave is not a impressiveness. sent7: that the incubus is not a Maginot and does tyrannize does not hold. sent8: if the rings does not mount or it dropkicks gulag or both then the weave does dropkicks gulag. sent9: something does not rouse if the fact that it is not a kind of an example and it dies is false. sent10: the chuck is not non-puncturable and it is a fourpence. sent11: if the weave dropkicks gulag then that the chuck is not an example and is a die does not hold. sent12: if something does not die it does not startle coalition or it does dropkick gulag or both. sent13: either everything is not a die or it does not dropkick gulag or both. sent14: if that the incubus is not a Maginot but it does tyrannize is wrong the rings is not an example. sent15: if something does not startle coalition and/or it does dropkick gulag the chuck is not a mount.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weave does die.; sent14 & sent7 -> int1: the rings is not an example.; sent12 -> int2: the weave does not startle coalition and/or it does dropkick gulag if it does not die.; sent10 -> int3: the fact that the chuck is not puncturable is not correct.; sent5 -> int4: if the chuck is puncturable but not a mount then it does rouse.;
the keeper does not mount.
sent13 -> int5: the rings does not die and/or does not dropkick gulag.; sent1 -> int6: if the rings is not a die then the fact that it does mount and it is an example is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the chuck rouses. ; $context$ = sent1: that something mounts and is an example is not true if it does not die. sent2: something does not dropkick gulag and/or it is a fourpence. sent3: the rings does startle coalition and it is puncturable if it is not a Maginot. sent4: the keeper is not a mount if there is something such that the fact that it is a mount and it is a kind of an example is false. sent5: something does rouse if it is puncturable and is not a mount. sent6: the weave is not a impressiveness. sent7: that the incubus is not a Maginot and does tyrannize does not hold. sent8: if the rings does not mount or it dropkicks gulag or both then the weave does dropkicks gulag. sent9: something does not rouse if the fact that it is not a kind of an example and it dies is false. sent10: the chuck is not non-puncturable and it is a fourpence. sent11: if the weave dropkicks gulag then that the chuck is not an example and is a die does not hold. sent12: if something does not die it does not startle coalition or it does dropkick gulag or both. sent13: either everything is not a die or it does not dropkick gulag or both. sent14: if that the incubus is not a Maginot but it does tyrannize is wrong the rings is not an example. sent15: if something does not startle coalition and/or it does dropkick gulag the chuck is not a mount. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weave does die.; sent14 & sent7 -> int1: the rings is not an example.; sent12 -> int2: the weave does not startle coalition and/or it does dropkick gulag if it does not die.; sent10 -> int3: the fact that the chuck is not puncturable is not correct.; sent5 -> int4: if the chuck is puncturable but not a mount then it does rouse.; __UNKNOWN__