that that the partitive does not occur yields that the prerequisite does not occur is not right.
sent1: that the downtick does not occur is not wrong. sent2: if the admeasuring feelings happens and the colostomy happens that the logicalness does not occur is not wrong. sent3: that the prerequisite happens and the prelims happens triggers the non-garlickiness. sent4: the stoppering does not occur if both the buccalness and the caucusing Bromo-seltzer happens. sent5: if the partitive happens then the prerequisite does not occur. sent6: the Churchillianness occurs. sent7: the hanging occurs. sent8: the fact that the queening Chicano does not occur hold. sent9: that the queening Chicano does not occur is brought about by the non-garlickiness. sent10: that the admeasuring nymphalid occurs hold. sent11: the lasting occurs and the admeasuring hexane occurs. sent12: the mark occurs. sent13: the prelims happens. sent14: the fact that the admeasuring Runyon occurs hold. sent15: if the drumming does not occur the avifaunalness does not occur. sent16: that the partitiveness but not the queening Chicano happens is triggered by the non-garlickiness. sent17: that the accounting does not occur is caused by that the botanicness does not occur. sent18: if that the partitive does not occur is right then the prerequisite happens. sent19: the extrospectiveness but not the plantigradeness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prerequisite occurs.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the prerequisite happens and the prelims happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the garlickiness does not occur hold.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the partitive happens but the queening Chicano does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the partitiveness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the partitive does not occur.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the prerequisite does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the partitive does not occur yields that the prerequisite does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the downtick does not occur is not wrong. sent2: if the admeasuring feelings happens and the colostomy happens that the logicalness does not occur is not wrong. sent3: that the prerequisite happens and the prelims happens triggers the non-garlickiness. sent4: the stoppering does not occur if both the buccalness and the caucusing Bromo-seltzer happens. sent5: if the partitive happens then the prerequisite does not occur. sent6: the Churchillianness occurs. sent7: the hanging occurs. sent8: the fact that the queening Chicano does not occur hold. sent9: that the queening Chicano does not occur is brought about by the non-garlickiness. sent10: that the admeasuring nymphalid occurs hold. sent11: the lasting occurs and the admeasuring hexane occurs. sent12: the mark occurs. sent13: the prelims happens. sent14: the fact that the admeasuring Runyon occurs hold. sent15: if the drumming does not occur the avifaunalness does not occur. sent16: that the partitiveness but not the queening Chicano happens is triggered by the non-garlickiness. sent17: that the accounting does not occur is caused by that the botanicness does not occur. sent18: if that the partitive does not occur is right then the prerequisite happens. sent19: the extrospectiveness but not the plantigradeness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prerequisite occurs.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the prerequisite happens and the prelims happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the garlickiness does not occur hold.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the partitive happens but the queening Chicano does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the partitiveness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the partitive does not occur.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the prerequisite does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__