that the citrulline is a parhelion hold.
sent1: the bandage is a pinto if that it is a management and it is not a pinto does not hold. sent2: if the bandage is a cybercrime and is a kind of a burnup then the gusset is not tectonic. sent3: the toque is metamorphous. sent4: if the fact that something is a pinto that is tectonic does not hold it is not unethical. sent5: the bandage is unethical if the gusset is a kind of a cybercrime but it is not robotic. sent6: that the bandage is a pinto that is tectonic is incorrect if the grad is not a kind of a Ephesian. sent7: the gusset is Ephesian if the grad is a kind of a nocturne and is a cybercrime. sent8: if the toque is metamorphous the fact that the bandage is a management but it is not a kind of a pinto is not correct. sent9: the citrulline is not a parhelion if the toque is a burnup but it is not a nocturne. sent10: the fact that the citrulline is not a burnup is right if the bandage is a pinto and it is a kind of a burnup. sent11: the fact that the grad is a kind of a cybercrime that is a kind of a Ephesian is wrong if the fact that the gusset is not robotic is not wrong. sent12: if that something is a nocturne but not unethical is false it is a kind of a parhelion. sent13: if the gusset is a kind of a nocturne then the toque is a burnup but not a nocturne. sent14: that the grad is not a kind of a Ephesian is true. sent15: if something is a arbovirus that it is non-Ephesian and it is not tectonic is false. sent16: the fact that something is a nocturne but it is not unethical does not hold if it is not a kind of a burnup. sent17: something is a cybercrime and is not robotic if it is not a nocturne. sent18: if that something is not a Ephesian and it is not tectonic is not right then it is a burnup.
sent17 -> int1: the gusset is a cybercrime and is not robotic if it is not a nocturne.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gusset is not a nocturne.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gusset is a kind of a cybercrime that is not robotic.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the bandage is unethical hold.; sent4 -> int4: if the fact that the bandage is a pinto and tectonic is not true it is not unethical.; sent6 & sent14 -> int5: the fact that the bandage is both a pinto and not non-tectonic is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bandage is not unethical.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the gusset is a kind of a nocturne.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the toque is a burnup but it is not a nocturne.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the citrulline is a parhelion.
sent12 -> int10: if the fact that the citrulline is a nocturne and is not unethical is not right then it is a parhelion.; sent16 -> int11: that the citrulline is a kind of a nocturne that is not unethical is wrong if it is not a kind of a burnup.; sent8 & sent3 -> int12: that the bandage is a management but it is not a pinto is not right.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: the bandage is a pinto.; sent18 -> int14: the bandage is a kind of a burnup if that it is not a kind of a Ephesian and it is not tectonic is wrong.; sent15 -> int15: if the bandage is a kind of a arbovirus then the fact that it is not a Ephesian and it is non-tectonic is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the citrulline is a parhelion hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the bandage is a pinto if that it is a management and it is not a pinto does not hold. sent2: if the bandage is a cybercrime and is a kind of a burnup then the gusset is not tectonic. sent3: the toque is metamorphous. sent4: if the fact that something is a pinto that is tectonic does not hold it is not unethical. sent5: the bandage is unethical if the gusset is a kind of a cybercrime but it is not robotic. sent6: that the bandage is a pinto that is tectonic is incorrect if the grad is not a kind of a Ephesian. sent7: the gusset is Ephesian if the grad is a kind of a nocturne and is a cybercrime. sent8: if the toque is metamorphous the fact that the bandage is a management but it is not a kind of a pinto is not correct. sent9: the citrulline is not a parhelion if the toque is a burnup but it is not a nocturne. sent10: the fact that the citrulline is not a burnup is right if the bandage is a pinto and it is a kind of a burnup. sent11: the fact that the grad is a kind of a cybercrime that is a kind of a Ephesian is wrong if the fact that the gusset is not robotic is not wrong. sent12: if that something is a nocturne but not unethical is false it is a kind of a parhelion. sent13: if the gusset is a kind of a nocturne then the toque is a burnup but not a nocturne. sent14: that the grad is not a kind of a Ephesian is true. sent15: if something is a arbovirus that it is non-Ephesian and it is not tectonic is false. sent16: the fact that something is a nocturne but it is not unethical does not hold if it is not a kind of a burnup. sent17: something is a cybercrime and is not robotic if it is not a nocturne. sent18: if that something is not a Ephesian and it is not tectonic is not right then it is a burnup. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the gusset is a cybercrime and is not robotic if it is not a nocturne.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gusset is not a nocturne.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gusset is a kind of a cybercrime that is not robotic.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the bandage is unethical hold.; sent4 -> int4: if the fact that the bandage is a pinto and tectonic is not true it is not unethical.; sent6 & sent14 -> int5: the fact that the bandage is both a pinto and not non-tectonic is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bandage is not unethical.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the gusset is a kind of a nocturne.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the toque is a burnup but it is not a nocturne.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__