the aerogram does not theme Bassariscus.
sent1: something trivializes manhunt. sent2: there are celiac things. sent3: if something is not a homogenate it is a kind of a banter and trivializes accordance. sent4: if something is a banter then it is a shop. sent5: if the dick trivializes manhunt it is a Eurafrican. sent6: if the dick is a kind of a shop that is not a allemande the energid shop. sent7: the energid is a homogenate and a allemande. sent8: if something shops and does theme Bassariscus then the energid is not a kind of a allemande. sent9: something is a banter if it does not trivialize accordance. sent10: the tier does theme Bassariscus and it is intramural. sent11: the dick does trivialize manhunt if the proprioceptor is a wheeler. sent12: something does trivialize manhunt and is not a Eurafrican. sent13: the naiad does not trivialize accordance. sent14: something is bottomless if it is not a Blida. sent15: the energid themes Bassariscus. sent16: there is something such that it does not pother. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a natural and it is a Gounod. sent18: the dick is a shop and is not a allemande if it is Eurafrican. sent19: the aerogram does not trivialize accordance if something that trivializes manhunt is not a Eurafrican. sent20: something does shop if the fact that it is not a homogenate hold.
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the aerogram does not trivialize accordance is not wrong then it is a banter.; sent12 & sent19 -> int2: the aerogram does not trivialize accordance.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the aerogram is a banter.; sent4 -> int4: if the aerogram is a banter it is a shop.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the aerogram is a shop.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aerogram does theme Bassariscus.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the aerogram does shop and themes Bassariscus.; int6 -> int7: that something does shop and it themes Bassariscus is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the energid is not a kind of a allemande.; sent7 -> int9: the energid is a allemande.; int8 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the aerogram themes Bassariscus.
sent3 -> int11: if the energid is not a kind of a homogenate then it is a banter and does trivialize accordance.;
$hypothesis$ = the aerogram does not theme Bassariscus. ; $context$ = sent1: something trivializes manhunt. sent2: there are celiac things. sent3: if something is not a homogenate it is a kind of a banter and trivializes accordance. sent4: if something is a banter then it is a shop. sent5: if the dick trivializes manhunt it is a Eurafrican. sent6: if the dick is a kind of a shop that is not a allemande the energid shop. sent7: the energid is a homogenate and a allemande. sent8: if something shops and does theme Bassariscus then the energid is not a kind of a allemande. sent9: something is a banter if it does not trivialize accordance. sent10: the tier does theme Bassariscus and it is intramural. sent11: the dick does trivialize manhunt if the proprioceptor is a wheeler. sent12: something does trivialize manhunt and is not a Eurafrican. sent13: the naiad does not trivialize accordance. sent14: something is bottomless if it is not a Blida. sent15: the energid themes Bassariscus. sent16: there is something such that it does not pother. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a natural and it is a Gounod. sent18: the dick is a shop and is not a allemande if it is Eurafrican. sent19: the aerogram does not trivialize accordance if something that trivializes manhunt is not a Eurafrican. sent20: something does shop if the fact that it is not a homogenate hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the aerogram does not trivialize accordance is not wrong then it is a banter.; sent12 & sent19 -> int2: the aerogram does not trivialize accordance.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the aerogram is a banter.; sent4 -> int4: if the aerogram is a banter it is a shop.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the aerogram is a shop.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aerogram does theme Bassariscus.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the aerogram does shop and themes Bassariscus.; int6 -> int7: that something does shop and it themes Bassariscus is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the energid is not a kind of a allemande.; sent7 -> int9: the energid is a allemande.; int8 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__