the fact that there is something such that that it is not a kind of a photostat and it is ankylotic is not right is not right.
sent1: the fact that the lime does not pole and does not segregate Bristol is false. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does not photostat and it does not pole is false. sent3: that the lime does segregate Bristol but it is not a kind of a stoplight is incorrect. sent4: something is not a photostat but it is ankylotic. sent5: if the curb is a kind of a pole that the Augustinian is a photostat and ankylotic is wrong. sent6: the curb is ankylotic if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a pole and it does not photostat is wrong. sent7: there is something such that that it does not segregate Bristol and it is a kind of a stoplight is not true. sent8: the fact that the lime is not a Shamash and is not a Aeolian is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the lime does not segregate Bristol and it is not a stoplight is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the curb poles is not false then the fact that the Augustinian does not photostat but it is ankylotic does not hold. sent11: something is ankylotic if it is bizonal. sent12: that the Augustinian is a photostat that is ankylotic does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that that it does segregate Bristol and it is not a stoplight is correct is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that it does not segregate Bristol and is not a kind of a stoplight. sent15: if the Guest is bizonal the curb is a pole. sent16: the fact that the fact that the Augustinian is not bizonal but a photostat is correct is not right. sent17: the Guest is bizonal if something segregates Bristol. sent18: if something does not pole it is bizonal. sent19: that the Guest is bizonal hold if there exists something such that the fact that it does not segregate Bristol and it is not a stoplight is not correct. sent20: there is something such that that it does photostat and is ankylotic does not hold.
sent9 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not segregate Bristol and it is not a stoplight is not right.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the Guest is bizonal.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the curb poles.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: that the Augustinian is not a photostat but it is ankylotic is not correct.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the suction is ankylotic.
sent11 -> int5: if the suction is bizonal it is ankylotic.; sent18 -> int6: the fact that the suction is bizonal hold if it is not a pole.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that that it is not a kind of a photostat and it is ankylotic is not right is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the lime does not pole and does not segregate Bristol is false. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does not photostat and it does not pole is false. sent3: that the lime does segregate Bristol but it is not a kind of a stoplight is incorrect. sent4: something is not a photostat but it is ankylotic. sent5: if the curb is a kind of a pole that the Augustinian is a photostat and ankylotic is wrong. sent6: the curb is ankylotic if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a pole and it does not photostat is wrong. sent7: there is something such that that it does not segregate Bristol and it is a kind of a stoplight is not true. sent8: the fact that the lime is not a Shamash and is not a Aeolian is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the lime does not segregate Bristol and it is not a stoplight is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the curb poles is not false then the fact that the Augustinian does not photostat but it is ankylotic does not hold. sent11: something is ankylotic if it is bizonal. sent12: that the Augustinian is a photostat that is ankylotic does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that that it does segregate Bristol and it is not a stoplight is correct is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that it does not segregate Bristol and is not a kind of a stoplight. sent15: if the Guest is bizonal the curb is a pole. sent16: the fact that the fact that the Augustinian is not bizonal but a photostat is correct is not right. sent17: the Guest is bizonal if something segregates Bristol. sent18: if something does not pole it is bizonal. sent19: that the Guest is bizonal hold if there exists something such that the fact that it does not segregate Bristol and it is not a stoplight is not correct. sent20: there is something such that that it does photostat and is ankylotic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not segregate Bristol and it is not a stoplight is not right.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the Guest is bizonal.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the curb poles.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: that the Augustinian is not a photostat but it is ankylotic is not correct.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__