the isoclinal is a Zapodidae.
sent1: if the fact that the campanile is not proximate and it does not host is wrong the oxalacetate is litigious. sent2: the isoclinal is a Zapodidae if there is something such that it is existentialist thing that is litigious. sent3: the oxalacetate is litigious if the campanile is proximate. sent4: if that the tiercel is not an intermediate hold the oxalacetate is an intermediate and is existentialist. sent5: the almandine is not litigious and it is not proximate. sent6: that the oxalacetate is both a pulp and not an intermediate is not true. sent7: everything does din almandine and it is a acetabulum. sent8: the campanile is not proximate if that the almandine hosts and does din almandine is wrong. sent9: that the tiercel is not a pulp and is a by-election does not hold if the hayfield is not a pulp. sent10: the fact that the hayfield is a kind of a Zapodidae and is a kind of a by-election is not true if there exists something such that it is a pulp. sent11: if the oxalacetate is an intermediate the tiercel is a pulp. sent12: the fact that the almandine is not a acetabulum hold if it is not a height. sent13: the tiercel is not an intermediate if it is not a by-election. sent14: if the campanile is an intermediate then the fact that the oxalacetate is non-existentialist thing that is not a by-election is not correct. sent15: the tiercel is a by-election if that the oxalacetate is non-existentialist and it is not a by-election does not hold. sent16: the fact that the campanile is non-proximate and it does not host is not right if the almandine dins almandine. sent17: if the fact that the almandine is not a acetabulum hold then the fact that it is a host that dins almandine is false. sent18: if that something is both not a pulp and a by-election is wrong then it is not an intermediate. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it is linguistic and it concerns is not correct that the hayfield does not pulp is right. sent20: the oxalacetate is an intermediate if the campanile is a existentialist.
sent18 -> int1: the tiercel is not intermediate if that it is not a pulp and is a by-election is wrong.; sent7 -> int2: the almandine does din almandine and it is a kind of a acetabulum.; int2 -> int3: the almandine dins almandine.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that the campanile is not proximate and not a host is false.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the oxalacetate is litigious.;
the isoclinal is not a Zapodidae.
$hypothesis$ = the isoclinal is a Zapodidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the campanile is not proximate and it does not host is wrong the oxalacetate is litigious. sent2: the isoclinal is a Zapodidae if there is something such that it is existentialist thing that is litigious. sent3: the oxalacetate is litigious if the campanile is proximate. sent4: if that the tiercel is not an intermediate hold the oxalacetate is an intermediate and is existentialist. sent5: the almandine is not litigious and it is not proximate. sent6: that the oxalacetate is both a pulp and not an intermediate is not true. sent7: everything does din almandine and it is a acetabulum. sent8: the campanile is not proximate if that the almandine hosts and does din almandine is wrong. sent9: that the tiercel is not a pulp and is a by-election does not hold if the hayfield is not a pulp. sent10: the fact that the hayfield is a kind of a Zapodidae and is a kind of a by-election is not true if there exists something such that it is a pulp. sent11: if the oxalacetate is an intermediate the tiercel is a pulp. sent12: the fact that the almandine is not a acetabulum hold if it is not a height. sent13: the tiercel is not an intermediate if it is not a by-election. sent14: if the campanile is an intermediate then the fact that the oxalacetate is non-existentialist thing that is not a by-election is not correct. sent15: the tiercel is a by-election if that the oxalacetate is non-existentialist and it is not a by-election does not hold. sent16: the fact that the campanile is non-proximate and it does not host is not right if the almandine dins almandine. sent17: if the fact that the almandine is not a acetabulum hold then the fact that it is a host that dins almandine is false. sent18: if that something is both not a pulp and a by-election is wrong then it is not an intermediate. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it is linguistic and it concerns is not correct that the hayfield does not pulp is right. sent20: the oxalacetate is an intermediate if the campanile is a existentialist. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the tiercel is not intermediate if that it is not a pulp and is a by-election is wrong.; sent7 -> int2: the almandine does din almandine and it is a kind of a acetabulum.; int2 -> int3: the almandine dins almandine.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that the campanile is not proximate and not a host is false.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the oxalacetate is litigious.; __UNKNOWN__