the angiologist does not measure pincer and is a compressor.
sent1: the mate is a Catalan if that the lass is a Catalan is not wrong. sent2: that the West is not a compressor but it does measure pincer is incorrect. sent3: if the pincer is peritoneal then the POB remonstrates eyebrow and is not chemoreceptive. sent4: the lass is not a bell. sent5: if something that does not measure pincer is a kind of a compressor the fact that the angiologist does bell is not incorrect. sent6: something is not a bell if the fact that it is overt hold. sent7: if the fact that the constraint does not vacate and is not metacentric is incorrect then the carbonara is not overt. sent8: the West is behavioristic if the tomtate does syllogize limber. sent9: if the POB does remonstrate eyebrow and is not chemoreceptive the West remonstrate eyebrow. sent10: that something does not measure pincer and is a kind of a compressor is false if it is not a bell. sent11: if the West is not Catalan then the fact that it is metacentric and it is a kind of a compressor is not right. sent12: something does vacate and is not metacentric. sent13: the carbonara is a cordon if the prisoner does not remonstrate eyebrow. sent14: if that the West is a kind of a compressor is correct the angiologist does not measure pincer and is a compressor. sent15: if that something is a kind of overt thing that is not a kind of a bell does not hold it is a kind of a Catalan. sent16: if something is a kind of a cordon then it is a mobile or it does not remonstrate nonce or both. sent17: the lass does bell if there is something such that it does not vacate and it is not metacentric. sent18: the West is not overt. sent19: the fact that if the lass is not Catalan the angiologist is overt and it does measure Sphecius hold. sent20: the prisoner does not remonstrate eyebrow if the West is behavioristic and does remonstrate eyebrow. sent21: something is a Catalan but it does not measure pincer. sent22: the fact that if the carbonara is not overt then the fact that the carbonara measures Sphecius and is Catalan is wrong is not incorrect. sent23: the fact that the pincer is not a steeple but it is a Teton is incorrect. sent24: the tomtate does syllogize limber. sent25: if the prisoner does not remonstrate nonce then the West is a kind of a compressor. sent26: the pincer is peritoneal if the fact that it is not a steeple but a Teton does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the constraint does not vacate and is not metacentric.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not vacate and is not metacentric.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the lass does bell.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the constraint does not vacate and is not metacentric is false.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the carbonara is not overt.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: that the carbonara does measure Sphecius and it is a Catalan is not right.;
the fact that the angiologist does not measure pincer but it is a kind of a compressor is false.
sent10 -> int7: if that the angiologist is not a bell is true the fact that it does not measure pincer and is a kind of a compressor is not true.; sent6 -> int8: the angiologist is not a kind of a bell if it is overt.; sent16 -> int9: if the carbonara is a cordon it is a mobile and/or does not remonstrate nonce.; sent8 & sent24 -> int10: the West is behavioristic.; sent26 & sent23 -> int11: the fact that the pincer is peritoneal is correct.; sent3 & int11 -> int12: the POB does remonstrate eyebrow but it is not chemoreceptive.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: the West does remonstrate eyebrow.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the West is behavioristic and it remonstrates eyebrow.; sent20 & int14 -> int15: the prisoner does not remonstrate eyebrow.; sent13 & int15 -> int16: that the carbonara is a cordon is not false.; int9 & int16 -> int17: the carbonara is a kind of a mobile and/or it does not remonstrate nonce.; int17 -> int18: either something is a mobile or it does not remonstrate nonce or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the angiologist does not measure pincer and is a compressor. ; $context$ = sent1: the mate is a Catalan if that the lass is a Catalan is not wrong. sent2: that the West is not a compressor but it does measure pincer is incorrect. sent3: if the pincer is peritoneal then the POB remonstrates eyebrow and is not chemoreceptive. sent4: the lass is not a bell. sent5: if something that does not measure pincer is a kind of a compressor the fact that the angiologist does bell is not incorrect. sent6: something is not a bell if the fact that it is overt hold. sent7: if the fact that the constraint does not vacate and is not metacentric is incorrect then the carbonara is not overt. sent8: the West is behavioristic if the tomtate does syllogize limber. sent9: if the POB does remonstrate eyebrow and is not chemoreceptive the West remonstrate eyebrow. sent10: that something does not measure pincer and is a kind of a compressor is false if it is not a bell. sent11: if the West is not Catalan then the fact that it is metacentric and it is a kind of a compressor is not right. sent12: something does vacate and is not metacentric. sent13: the carbonara is a cordon if the prisoner does not remonstrate eyebrow. sent14: if that the West is a kind of a compressor is correct the angiologist does not measure pincer and is a compressor. sent15: if that something is a kind of overt thing that is not a kind of a bell does not hold it is a kind of a Catalan. sent16: if something is a kind of a cordon then it is a mobile or it does not remonstrate nonce or both. sent17: the lass does bell if there is something such that it does not vacate and it is not metacentric. sent18: the West is not overt. sent19: the fact that if the lass is not Catalan the angiologist is overt and it does measure Sphecius hold. sent20: the prisoner does not remonstrate eyebrow if the West is behavioristic and does remonstrate eyebrow. sent21: something is a Catalan but it does not measure pincer. sent22: the fact that if the carbonara is not overt then the fact that the carbonara measures Sphecius and is Catalan is wrong is not incorrect. sent23: the fact that the pincer is not a steeple but it is a Teton is incorrect. sent24: the tomtate does syllogize limber. sent25: if the prisoner does not remonstrate nonce then the West is a kind of a compressor. sent26: the pincer is peritoneal if the fact that it is not a steeple but a Teton does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the constraint does not vacate and is not metacentric.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not vacate and is not metacentric.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the lass does bell.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the constraint does not vacate and is not metacentric is false.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the carbonara is not overt.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: that the carbonara does measure Sphecius and it is a Catalan is not right.; __UNKNOWN__