the jodhpur harangues streptokinase.
sent1: the fact that the circlet is a kind of an irritant and it is monumental does not hold. sent2: something does harangue streptokinase if that it does not trample and it is not basipetal is incorrect. sent3: that the librettist does not upload economy is correct. sent4: something is a trampler if that it is basipetal is not wrong. sent5: the jodhpur is uneasy if the fact that it is not basipetal and does not harangue streptokinase is not correct. sent6: the slate is a trampler if that it does bull is not false. sent7: the librettist does trample. sent8: the jodhpur is prejudicial. sent9: if the librettist does not upload economy then the fact that it is leonine and it is not surmountable does not hold. sent10: the librettist is not a specialization. sent11: if the hop-picker is uneasy then that the jodhpur does not trample and is not basipetal is not right. sent12: something is a kind of a specialization. sent13: if the hop-picker does harangue Dacelo the fact that it is not basipetal is correct. sent14: something that harangues Dacelo is uneasy thing that does not harangue streptokinase. sent15: that the jodhpur is easy thing that is basipetal is not true if the librettist harangues streptokinase. sent16: if something is perinatal then it infixes. sent17: the librettist is not a specialization and is a solvation if it is uneasy. sent18: if the fact that something is leonine but it is not surmountable does not hold it is basipetal. sent19: that the hop-picker does harangue streptokinase and is a kind of a Pickford does not hold. sent20: the fact that if the librettist is not uneasy then that the hop-picker is uneasy and harangues Dacelo is true is not wrong. sent21: the librettist does harangue streptokinase. sent22: if the jodhpur is not a kind of a solvation the hop-picker is both a solvation and a specialization. sent23: the hop-picker does harangue Assamese.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the librettist is uneasy.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the librettist is not a specialization and is a solvation.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the jodhpur does harangue streptokinase is true if the fact that it is not a trampler and it is not basipetal does not hold.;
the jodhpur does not harangue streptokinase.
sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the jodhpur harangues Dacelo hold then it is not restful and it does not harangue streptokinase.; sent4 -> int4: the librettist is a trampler if it is basipetal.; sent18 -> int5: if that the librettist is leonine but it is not surmountable is not correct it is basipetal.; sent9 & sent3 -> int6: that the librettist is both leonine and not surmountable does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the librettist is basipetal.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the librettist does trample.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it tramples.;
$hypothesis$ = the jodhpur harangues streptokinase. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the circlet is a kind of an irritant and it is monumental does not hold. sent2: something does harangue streptokinase if that it does not trample and it is not basipetal is incorrect. sent3: that the librettist does not upload economy is correct. sent4: something is a trampler if that it is basipetal is not wrong. sent5: the jodhpur is uneasy if the fact that it is not basipetal and does not harangue streptokinase is not correct. sent6: the slate is a trampler if that it does bull is not false. sent7: the librettist does trample. sent8: the jodhpur is prejudicial. sent9: if the librettist does not upload economy then the fact that it is leonine and it is not surmountable does not hold. sent10: the librettist is not a specialization. sent11: if the hop-picker is uneasy then that the jodhpur does not trample and is not basipetal is not right. sent12: something is a kind of a specialization. sent13: if the hop-picker does harangue Dacelo the fact that it is not basipetal is correct. sent14: something that harangues Dacelo is uneasy thing that does not harangue streptokinase. sent15: that the jodhpur is easy thing that is basipetal is not true if the librettist harangues streptokinase. sent16: if something is perinatal then it infixes. sent17: the librettist is not a specialization and is a solvation if it is uneasy. sent18: if the fact that something is leonine but it is not surmountable does not hold it is basipetal. sent19: that the hop-picker does harangue streptokinase and is a kind of a Pickford does not hold. sent20: the fact that if the librettist is not uneasy then that the hop-picker is uneasy and harangues Dacelo is true is not wrong. sent21: the librettist does harangue streptokinase. sent22: if the jodhpur is not a kind of a solvation the hop-picker is both a solvation and a specialization. sent23: the hop-picker does harangue Assamese. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the librettist is uneasy.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the librettist is not a specialization and is a solvation.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the jodhpur does harangue streptokinase is true if the fact that it is not a trampler and it is not basipetal does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__