the lammergeier is a kind of a wet-nurse.
sent1: if something is not iritic then that it is low-interest and not afloat is not correct. sent2: the fact that the omnirange is not runic and is not a antimeson is false. sent3: something is not runic and is not a antimeson. sent4: the Guernsey is a wet-nurse. sent5: if something is pious then it is a kind of a trained. sent6: the bassarisk is pious if the megagametophyte is pious. sent7: if the mucilage is not dysphemistic that the fact that the lammergeier is a wet-nurse and not a compliment is not true is not false. sent8: the Jihadist is not low-interest if that the bassarisk is low-interest and is not afloat is not true. sent9: if the mucilage does compliment then the lammergeier is a kind of a wet-nurse. sent10: something that is a trained is not iritic. sent11: if the megagametophyte is not regional then it is pious and does unbar orangeade. sent12: the megagametophyte is not regional. sent13: if the mortar is non-dysphemistic and is not a cosmology then the mucilage is non-dysphemistic. sent14: the fact that something is not a wet-nurse is correct if the fact that it is a wet-nurse and not a compliment is not right.
sent2 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not runic and is not a antimeson does not hold.;
the lammergeier is not a wet-nurse.
sent14 -> int2: if the fact that the lammergeier is a wet-nurse but it does not compliment is not right then it is not a wet-nurse.; sent1 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the bassarisk is both not non-low-interest and non-afloat is false is not wrong if it is not iritic.; sent10 -> int4: if that the bassarisk is a trained is correct it is not iritic.; sent5 -> int5: if the bassarisk is pious it is a trained.; sent11 & sent12 -> int6: the megagametophyte is pious and does unbar orangeade.; int6 -> int7: that the megagametophyte is pious is right.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the bassarisk is pious.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the bassarisk trains.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the bassarisk is not iritic.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the fact that the bassarisk is low-interest and not afloat hold is false.; sent8 & int11 -> int12: the Jihadist is not low-interest.; int12 -> int13: there are non-low-interest things.;
$hypothesis$ = the lammergeier is a kind of a wet-nurse. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not iritic then that it is low-interest and not afloat is not correct. sent2: the fact that the omnirange is not runic and is not a antimeson is false. sent3: something is not runic and is not a antimeson. sent4: the Guernsey is a wet-nurse. sent5: if something is pious then it is a kind of a trained. sent6: the bassarisk is pious if the megagametophyte is pious. sent7: if the mucilage is not dysphemistic that the fact that the lammergeier is a wet-nurse and not a compliment is not true is not false. sent8: the Jihadist is not low-interest if that the bassarisk is low-interest and is not afloat is not true. sent9: if the mucilage does compliment then the lammergeier is a kind of a wet-nurse. sent10: something that is a trained is not iritic. sent11: if the megagametophyte is not regional then it is pious and does unbar orangeade. sent12: the megagametophyte is not regional. sent13: if the mortar is non-dysphemistic and is not a cosmology then the mucilage is non-dysphemistic. sent14: the fact that something is not a wet-nurse is correct if the fact that it is a wet-nurse and not a compliment is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not runic and is not a antimeson does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__