if the beaugregory is representational the senega unseals hayfork.
sent1: the jawan is a Nilotic. sent2: that that the jawan is not piano but it riffles silk is false if the beaugregory is representational is right. sent3: if something is a unconscientiousness it is rh-positive. sent4: the Dutchman's-pipe is a Nilotic. sent5: that the senega riffles silk if that the jawan is not a Nilotic and unseals hayfork is not true is correct. sent6: that the jawan is a piano and does riffle silk is incorrect. sent7: the jawan is a snarer. sent8: the jawan does unseal hayfork if it does riffle silk. sent9: if something is apocrine then it is a particulate. sent10: the senega is a kind of a Nilotic if the jawan is a piano. sent11: the fact that that the jawan is a kind of a piano that riffles silk does not hold if the beaugregory is representational is correct. sent12: the senega is representational if the beaugregory unseals hayfork. sent13: the senega is Nilotic if the fact that the beaugregory is not a piano but representational does not hold. sent14: the senega is not non-Nilotic if the fact that the beaugregory does not unseal hayfork but it is representational does not hold. sent15: if something is a Nilotic it unseals hayfork. sent16: the jawan unseals hayfork. sent17: if something is piano then it does riffle silk.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beaugregory is representational.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the jawan is not piano but it does riffle silk is incorrect.; sent15 -> int2: if the senega is a Nilotic then the fact that it unseals hayfork is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = if the beaugregory is representational the senega unseals hayfork. ; $context$ = sent1: the jawan is a Nilotic. sent2: that that the jawan is not piano but it riffles silk is false if the beaugregory is representational is right. sent3: if something is a unconscientiousness it is rh-positive. sent4: the Dutchman's-pipe is a Nilotic. sent5: that the senega riffles silk if that the jawan is not a Nilotic and unseals hayfork is not true is correct. sent6: that the jawan is a piano and does riffle silk is incorrect. sent7: the jawan is a snarer. sent8: the jawan does unseal hayfork if it does riffle silk. sent9: if something is apocrine then it is a particulate. sent10: the senega is a kind of a Nilotic if the jawan is a piano. sent11: the fact that that the jawan is a kind of a piano that riffles silk does not hold if the beaugregory is representational is correct. sent12: the senega is representational if the beaugregory unseals hayfork. sent13: the senega is Nilotic if the fact that the beaugregory is not a piano but representational does not hold. sent14: the senega is not non-Nilotic if the fact that the beaugregory does not unseal hayfork but it is representational does not hold. sent15: if something is a Nilotic it unseals hayfork. sent16: the jawan unseals hayfork. sent17: if something is piano then it does riffle silk. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beaugregory is representational.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the jawan is not piano but it does riffle silk is incorrect.; sent15 -> int2: if the senega is a Nilotic then the fact that it unseals hayfork is correct.; __UNKNOWN__