the allopurinol does not crop IBRD but it is easy.
sent1: if the blackcap is a comeback then it chants. sent2: if the vintner is subjacent that the Eurafrican either does not reunify or is not a kind of a young or both does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is imponderable then the triptych either is imponderable or does bullshit Ptah or both. sent4: the boson is holozoic if the fact that the fact that the blackcap is not unsalable or it is not a puckerbush or both is not true is not incorrect. sent5: the councilman does not bullshit Ptah if that the allopurinol does not crop IBRD but it is easy is wrong. sent6: the councilman does not crop IBRD if the fact that the allopurinol does not bullshit Ptah and is easy is wrong. sent7: the allopurinol does not bullshit Ptah but it is easy. sent8: the blackcap is a comeback. sent9: if there exists something such that that it does not reunify and/or it is not young is false then the sandwort does not strangulate moroseness. sent10: if something does not amend and is not pharyngeal then it is kinetic. sent11: the councilman does bullshit Ptah and is a megaspore. sent12: the councilman is a kind of a megaspore if the triptych is an imponderable. sent13: the begonia does not emaciate and it is not subjacent if the boson is holozoic. sent14: something does not amend and is not pharyngeal if it does not strangulate moroseness. sent15: something is an imponderable if it is kinetic. sent16: the fact that either the blackcap is not unsalable or it is not a kind of a puckerbush or both is not correct if it is a kind of a chanted. sent17: the vintner is subjacent if the begonia does not emaciate and is not subjacent.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the allopurinol does not crop IBRD but it is easy is not true.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the councilman does not bullshit Ptah.; sent11 -> int2: that the councilman bullshits Ptah is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that that the allopurinol does not crop IBRD and is easy hold is not right.
sent15 -> int4: the sandwort is imponderable if it is kinetic.; sent10 -> int5: if the sandwort does not amend and is not pharyngeal it is kinetic.; sent14 -> int6: if the sandwort does not strangulate moroseness then it does not amend and is not pharyngeal.; sent1 & sent8 -> int7: the blackcap chants.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the blackcap is not unsalable or it is not a kind of a puckerbush or both is not true.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the boson is not non-holozoic.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the begonia does not emaciate and is not subjacent.; sent17 & int10 -> int11: the vintner is subjacent.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: that the Eurafrican does not reunify and/or it is not young is false.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that either it does not reunify or it is not a young or both is incorrect.; int13 & sent9 -> int14: that the sandwort does not strangulate moroseness hold.; int6 & int14 -> int15: that the sandwort does not amend and is not pharyngeal hold.; int5 & int15 -> int16: the sandwort is kinetic.; int4 & int16 -> int17: the sandwort is a kind of an imponderable.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is an imponderable.; int18 & sent3 -> int19: the triptych is imponderable or it bullshits Ptah or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the allopurinol does not crop IBRD but it is easy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blackcap is a comeback then it chants. sent2: if the vintner is subjacent that the Eurafrican either does not reunify or is not a kind of a young or both does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is imponderable then the triptych either is imponderable or does bullshit Ptah or both. sent4: the boson is holozoic if the fact that the fact that the blackcap is not unsalable or it is not a puckerbush or both is not true is not incorrect. sent5: the councilman does not bullshit Ptah if that the allopurinol does not crop IBRD but it is easy is wrong. sent6: the councilman does not crop IBRD if the fact that the allopurinol does not bullshit Ptah and is easy is wrong. sent7: the allopurinol does not bullshit Ptah but it is easy. sent8: the blackcap is a comeback. sent9: if there exists something such that that it does not reunify and/or it is not young is false then the sandwort does not strangulate moroseness. sent10: if something does not amend and is not pharyngeal then it is kinetic. sent11: the councilman does bullshit Ptah and is a megaspore. sent12: the councilman is a kind of a megaspore if the triptych is an imponderable. sent13: the begonia does not emaciate and it is not subjacent if the boson is holozoic. sent14: something does not amend and is not pharyngeal if it does not strangulate moroseness. sent15: something is an imponderable if it is kinetic. sent16: the fact that either the blackcap is not unsalable or it is not a kind of a puckerbush or both is not correct if it is a kind of a chanted. sent17: the vintner is subjacent if the begonia does not emaciate and is not subjacent. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the allopurinol does not crop IBRD but it is easy is not true.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the councilman does not bullshit Ptah.; sent11 -> int2: that the councilman bullshits Ptah is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__