both the cyberneticness and the inadvisableness happens.
sent1: the creaming starch does not occur if the boustrophedonicness does not occur or the lubrication does not occur or both. sent2: the fact that the foremanship does not occur and/or the outwardness does not occur does not hold if the creaming starch does not occur. sent3: the bubalineness does not occur. sent4: the bubalineness occurs if the fact that the boustrophedonicness does not occur or the lubrication does not occur or both is not right. sent5: the cyberneticness happens if the save happens. sent6: the starting bargaining does not occur and/or the extraterritorialness does not occur if the creaming starch occurs. sent7: the fact that the save occurs is correct if that that either the foremanship does not occur or the outwardness does not occur or both is not true is correct. sent8: the inadvisableness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the boustrophedonicness does not occur and/or the lubrication does not occur is wrong.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the bubalineness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the boustrophedonicness does not occur and/or the lubrication does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the creaming starch does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the foremanship does not occur and/or the outwardness does not occur does not hold.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the save occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the cyberneticness occurs.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that both the cyberneticness and the inadvisableness occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = both the cyberneticness and the inadvisableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the creaming starch does not occur if the boustrophedonicness does not occur or the lubrication does not occur or both. sent2: the fact that the foremanship does not occur and/or the outwardness does not occur does not hold if the creaming starch does not occur. sent3: the bubalineness does not occur. sent4: the bubalineness occurs if the fact that the boustrophedonicness does not occur or the lubrication does not occur or both is not right. sent5: the cyberneticness happens if the save happens. sent6: the starting bargaining does not occur and/or the extraterritorialness does not occur if the creaming starch occurs. sent7: the fact that the save occurs is correct if that that either the foremanship does not occur or the outwardness does not occur or both is not true is correct. sent8: the inadvisableness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the boustrophedonicness does not occur and/or the lubrication does not occur is wrong.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the bubalineness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the boustrophedonicness does not occur and/or the lubrication does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the creaming starch does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the foremanship does not occur and/or the outwardness does not occur does not hold.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the save occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the cyberneticness occurs.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__