the convert is a dirham.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is a sexed and is not a dirham is incorrect then the epiphyllum is not a sweep. sent2: something is a dirham but it does not sweep. sent3: the synthesist does sweep. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is both a sexed and not a sweep is not correct then the synthesist is not a dirham. sent5: there is something such that that it covers schoolwork and is not a dirham is wrong. sent6: the fact that the synthesist is gyroscopic and it is a sexed is not right. sent7: that the epiphyllum is a kind of a sweep but it is not a dirham is not correct if the synthesist is a kind of a sexed. sent8: the fact that the glass is a kind of a dirham that is not a levee is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the lull is a mocking and a Edda is not right. sent10: the fact that the convert does sweep hold. sent11: the fact that the epiphyllum sexes but it does not cover schoolwork does not hold if the synthesist sweeps. sent12: if there exists something such that that that it is a kind of a sexed that does not cover schoolwork hold is incorrect the convert is not a dirham. sent13: the fact that the synthesist is a dirham and it sweeps is not right. sent14: the appeaser is not counterclockwise. sent15: that the synthesist covers schoolwork and is a sweep does not hold. sent16: that the epiphyllum is a dirham and does not cover schoolwork is not true. sent17: if there exists something such that that it does sweep and is not a sexed does not hold then the synthesist does not cover schoolwork. sent18: if the convert covers schoolwork then the fact that the epiphyllum is both a sexed and a dirham is false. sent19: the fact that the epiphyllum is a kind of a dirham but it is not a kind of a sexed is not right. sent20: if something does sex then the epiphyllum does not sweep. sent21: if the convert is a sexed that the epiphyllum does cover schoolwork and is not a kind of a dirham is not correct. sent22: that the epiphyllum is a kind of a dirham and it is a sexed is not right. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a sweep and it does not sex is incorrect the synthesist is not a dirham.
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: that the epiphyllum sexes and does not cover schoolwork is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a sexed and it does not cover schoolwork is not correct.; int2 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the convert is a dirham. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is a sexed and is not a dirham is incorrect then the epiphyllum is not a sweep. sent2: something is a dirham but it does not sweep. sent3: the synthesist does sweep. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is both a sexed and not a sweep is not correct then the synthesist is not a dirham. sent5: there is something such that that it covers schoolwork and is not a dirham is wrong. sent6: the fact that the synthesist is gyroscopic and it is a sexed is not right. sent7: that the epiphyllum is a kind of a sweep but it is not a dirham is not correct if the synthesist is a kind of a sexed. sent8: the fact that the glass is a kind of a dirham that is not a levee is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the lull is a mocking and a Edda is not right. sent10: the fact that the convert does sweep hold. sent11: the fact that the epiphyllum sexes but it does not cover schoolwork does not hold if the synthesist sweeps. sent12: if there exists something such that that that it is a kind of a sexed that does not cover schoolwork hold is incorrect the convert is not a dirham. sent13: the fact that the synthesist is a dirham and it sweeps is not right. sent14: the appeaser is not counterclockwise. sent15: that the synthesist covers schoolwork and is a sweep does not hold. sent16: that the epiphyllum is a dirham and does not cover schoolwork is not true. sent17: if there exists something such that that it does sweep and is not a sexed does not hold then the synthesist does not cover schoolwork. sent18: if the convert covers schoolwork then the fact that the epiphyllum is both a sexed and a dirham is false. sent19: the fact that the epiphyllum is a kind of a dirham but it is not a kind of a sexed is not right. sent20: if something does sex then the epiphyllum does not sweep. sent21: if the convert is a sexed that the epiphyllum does cover schoolwork and is not a kind of a dirham is not correct. sent22: that the epiphyllum is a kind of a dirham and it is a sexed is not right. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a sweep and it does not sex is incorrect the synthesist is not a dirham. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: that the epiphyllum sexes and does not cover schoolwork is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a sexed and it does not cover schoolwork is not correct.; int2 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__