there is something such that if that it is not a jackpot is not incorrect then it does antisepticize Bambusa or it is not naturistic or both.
sent1: something either antisepticizes Bambusa or is not naturistic or both if it is not a kind of a jackpot. sent2: if something does not antisepticize Chalcis then it is an employment or it is not an oblate or both. sent3: there is something such that if it is a jackpot it antisepticizes Bambusa and/or it is not naturistic.
sent1 -> int1: if the ray is not a kind of a jackpot then it antisepticizes Bambusa and/or it is not naturistic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not antisepticize Chalcis it is an employment or not oblate or both.
sent2 -> int2: the clasp is a kind of an employment and/or it is not an oblate if the fact that it does not antisepticize Chalcis hold.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not a jackpot is not incorrect then it does antisepticize Bambusa or it is not naturistic or both. ; $context$ = sent1: something either antisepticizes Bambusa or is not naturistic or both if it is not a kind of a jackpot. sent2: if something does not antisepticize Chalcis then it is an employment or it is not an oblate or both. sent3: there is something such that if it is a jackpot it antisepticizes Bambusa and/or it is not naturistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the ray is not a kind of a jackpot then it antisepticizes Bambusa and/or it is not naturistic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__