the fact that there exists something such that if it is skinless that it does not parse and does tenure is not right is not correct.
sent1: if the barrister is skinless the fact that it does parse and it is a kind of a tenured does not hold. sent2: if something is a kind of a aposelene that it is not a canonist and it is not non-oneiric is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is catarrhal the fact that it aberrates and it teases metalwork is not right. sent4: there exists something such that if it is skinless it does not parse and does tenure. sent5: the fact that the barrister does not parse but it is a tenured does not hold if it is skinless.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a aposelene then that it is not a canonist and it is oneiric is not right.
sent2 -> int1: if the synovia is a aposelene the fact that it is not a kind of a canonist and it is oneiric is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is skinless that it does not parse and does tenure is not right is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the barrister is skinless the fact that it does parse and it is a kind of a tenured does not hold. sent2: if something is a kind of a aposelene that it is not a canonist and it is not non-oneiric is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is catarrhal the fact that it aberrates and it teases metalwork is not right. sent4: there exists something such that if it is skinless it does not parse and does tenure. sent5: the fact that the barrister does not parse but it is a tenured does not hold if it is skinless. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__