that that the baklava is a tinsmith and it is a Gallicism is not right is correct.
sent1: the baklava is a tinsmith. sent2: if something does describe shallot and it is a quadruple then it is not a kind of a tinsmith. sent3: if the morel is a carapace the bulla does describe Lepanto. sent4: the tangelo is not Kantian. sent5: if a non-Kantian thing is not transoceanic it is dactylic. sent6: if that the bulla does describe Lepanto hold then the fact that it describes shallot is true. sent7: the fact that the tangelo is not transoceanic is correct. sent8: the bulla quadruples. sent9: the morel is a carapace if the tangelo is dactylic. sent10: the baklava is a kind of a tinsmith that is a Gallicism if the bulla is not a tinsmith.
sent5 -> int1: if the tangelo is not Kantian and it is not transoceanic it is dactylic.; sent4 & sent7 -> int2: the tangelo is not Kantian and it is not transoceanic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tangelo is dactylic.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the morel is a carapace.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the bulla describes Lepanto hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the bulla does describe shallot.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the bulla describes shallot and it quadruples.; sent2 -> int8: the bulla is not a tinsmith if it does describe shallot and does quadruple.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the bulla is not a tinsmith.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the baklava is a tinsmith and it is a Gallicism is not right is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the baklava is a tinsmith. sent2: if something does describe shallot and it is a quadruple then it is not a kind of a tinsmith. sent3: if the morel is a carapace the bulla does describe Lepanto. sent4: the tangelo is not Kantian. sent5: if a non-Kantian thing is not transoceanic it is dactylic. sent6: if that the bulla does describe Lepanto hold then the fact that it describes shallot is true. sent7: the fact that the tangelo is not transoceanic is correct. sent8: the bulla quadruples. sent9: the morel is a carapace if the tangelo is dactylic. sent10: the baklava is a kind of a tinsmith that is a Gallicism if the bulla is not a tinsmith. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the tangelo is not Kantian and it is not transoceanic it is dactylic.; sent4 & sent7 -> int2: the tangelo is not Kantian and it is not transoceanic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tangelo is dactylic.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the morel is a carapace.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the bulla describes Lepanto hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the bulla does describe shallot.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the bulla describes shallot and it quadruples.; sent2 -> int8: the bulla is not a tinsmith if it does describe shallot and does quadruple.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the bulla is not a tinsmith.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__