the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does not lather liter and it is a commandant is wrong is incorrect.
sent1: if something is a bombsight the ashcan does not eviscerate ashcan and it is not incompressible. sent2: that something does lather liter and is a commandant is false if it is a nonexistence. sent3: if something that does not eviscerate ashcan is not a kind of a nonexistence then that the ashcan is not a commandant is not right. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a bombsight is right. sent5: the hadron is a splice. sent6: there exists something such that it does not eviscerate dripstone and it is fabian. sent7: the fact that something does not lather liter but it is a commandant is not correct if it is a kind of a nonexistence. sent8: if something that does not eviscerate ashcan is not incompressible then the fact that the paperback is a kind of a nonexistence is not false.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the ashcan does not eviscerate ashcan and is not incompressible.; int1 -> int2: something does not eviscerate ashcan and it is not incompressible.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the paperback is a nonexistence.; sent7 -> int4: the fact that the paperback does not lather liter but it is a commandant is not correct if it is a nonexistence.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the paperback does not lather liter but it is a commandant does not hold.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does not lather liter and it is a commandant is wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a bombsight the ashcan does not eviscerate ashcan and it is not incompressible. sent2: that something does lather liter and is a commandant is false if it is a nonexistence. sent3: if something that does not eviscerate ashcan is not a kind of a nonexistence then that the ashcan is not a commandant is not right. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a bombsight is right. sent5: the hadron is a splice. sent6: there exists something such that it does not eviscerate dripstone and it is fabian. sent7: the fact that something does not lather liter but it is a commandant is not correct if it is a kind of a nonexistence. sent8: if something that does not eviscerate ashcan is not incompressible then the fact that the paperback is a kind of a nonexistence is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the ashcan does not eviscerate ashcan and is not incompressible.; int1 -> int2: something does not eviscerate ashcan and it is not incompressible.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the paperback is a nonexistence.; sent7 -> int4: the fact that the paperback does not lather liter but it is a commandant is not correct if it is a nonexistence.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the paperback does not lather liter but it is a commandant does not hold.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__