there is something such that if it is a Leacock but not a birdnesting then it is not prudent.
sent1: if the plasterer is a Leacock but it is not a birdnesting then it is prudent. sent2: the plasterer is not prudent if it is a kind of a Leacock and it does birdnest. sent3: the plasterer is not real-time if it idealizes and it is not a kind of a birdnesting. sent4: if the baron is a Urdu that is non-heterozygous then the fact that it is not avocational is true. sent5: the plasterer is not prudent if it is a kind of a Leacock and it is not a kind of a birdnesting. sent6: the plasterer is not a kind of a liftman if it is branchial and it does not serenade Constantine. sent7: there is something such that if it is a orthoscope and it is not Mandaean it is not a kind of a vervet. sent8: something is not a Mandaean if it does birdnest and it is not thermohydrometric. sent9: there exists something such that if it does serenade drum and it is not biographic it does not harshen kilobit. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a Leacock and is a birdnesting it is not prudent. sent11: if the pianist is a midwife but it is not a birdnesting it is not axial. sent12: there is something such that if it is celestial and is not a speech it does not serenade climacteric. sent13: there is something such that if it is a Leacock and is not a birdnesting then it is prudent. sent14: if something that does coordinate bunchberry does not serenade drum it is not expansionist. sent15: the plasterer is not a speech if it does retrograde and it does not spend. sent16: there is something such that if it is both resolute and undynamic it is not a kind of a tragicomedy. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a lunge that is not biographic then it does not consider plasterer. sent18: there is something such that if it is a kind of a facula that does not harshen Amur then it is not appointive.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does coordinate bunchberry and it does not serenade drum then it is not expansionist.
sent14 -> int1: if the bunchberry does coordinate bunchberry and does not serenade drum it is not expansionist.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a Leacock but not a birdnesting then it is not prudent. ; $context$ = sent1: if the plasterer is a Leacock but it is not a birdnesting then it is prudent. sent2: the plasterer is not prudent if it is a kind of a Leacock and it does birdnest. sent3: the plasterer is not real-time if it idealizes and it is not a kind of a birdnesting. sent4: if the baron is a Urdu that is non-heterozygous then the fact that it is not avocational is true. sent5: the plasterer is not prudent if it is a kind of a Leacock and it is not a kind of a birdnesting. sent6: the plasterer is not a kind of a liftman if it is branchial and it does not serenade Constantine. sent7: there is something such that if it is a orthoscope and it is not Mandaean it is not a kind of a vervet. sent8: something is not a Mandaean if it does birdnest and it is not thermohydrometric. sent9: there exists something such that if it does serenade drum and it is not biographic it does not harshen kilobit. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a Leacock and is a birdnesting it is not prudent. sent11: if the pianist is a midwife but it is not a birdnesting it is not axial. sent12: there is something such that if it is celestial and is not a speech it does not serenade climacteric. sent13: there is something such that if it is a Leacock and is not a birdnesting then it is prudent. sent14: if something that does coordinate bunchberry does not serenade drum it is not expansionist. sent15: the plasterer is not a speech if it does retrograde and it does not spend. sent16: there is something such that if it is both resolute and undynamic it is not a kind of a tragicomedy. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a lunge that is not biographic then it does not consider plasterer. sent18: there is something such that if it is a kind of a facula that does not harshen Amur then it is not appointive. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__