the exchangeableness happens or the unpicking happens or both.
sent1: that the putting Romaic occurs and the algometricness occurs leads to the unsympatheticness. sent2: the Laosness and the ununderstoodness occurs. sent3: the Slavonicness occurs and the carinalness occurs. sent4: the ophthalmoscopy occurs. sent5: that the tweeting irrelevance happens but the tweeting Garrick does not occur results in that the whooshing does not occur. sent6: the hapticness occurs if the hell does not occur and the unpropitiousness does not occur. sent7: if the millennialness but not the dragging woodhewer occurs the putting Delphinapterus happens. sent8: the detribalization and the lockage occurs if the tweeting message does not occur. sent9: the algometricness and the revival occurs if the whooshing does not occur. sent10: the hell does not occur. sent11: the putting Romaic is caused by the hapticness. sent12: the alighting occurs if the tweeting atorvastatin but not the jointedness happens. sent13: that the homicide does not occur is right. sent14: that the tweeting irrelevance but not the tweeting Garrick occurs is right. sent15: the millennialness happens and the medicolegalness happens. sent16: if the transmuting occurs then the feeding happens. sent17: the hell prevents the feeding. sent18: if the fact that the fact that the hell does not occur and the unpropitiousness does not occur is right is incorrect the feeding does not occur. sent19: that the facelift does not occur is brought about by that the dragging Simenon and the putting sample occurs. sent20: either the exchangeableness or the unpicking or both occurs if the sympatheticness does not occur. sent21: the transmuting occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hell does not occur and the unpropitiousness does not occur does not hold.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the feeding does not occur.; sent16 & sent21 -> int2: the feeding occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the hell does not occur and the unpropitiousness does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the hapticness happens.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the putting Romaic happens.; sent5 & sent14 -> int7: the whooshing does not occur.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the algometricness and the revival occurs.; int8 -> int9: the algometricness happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: both the putting Romaic and the algometricness happens.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the sympatheticness does not occur.; int11 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the exchangeableness happens or the unpicking happens or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the putting Romaic occurs and the algometricness occurs leads to the unsympatheticness. sent2: the Laosness and the ununderstoodness occurs. sent3: the Slavonicness occurs and the carinalness occurs. sent4: the ophthalmoscopy occurs. sent5: that the tweeting irrelevance happens but the tweeting Garrick does not occur results in that the whooshing does not occur. sent6: the hapticness occurs if the hell does not occur and the unpropitiousness does not occur. sent7: if the millennialness but not the dragging woodhewer occurs the putting Delphinapterus happens. sent8: the detribalization and the lockage occurs if the tweeting message does not occur. sent9: the algometricness and the revival occurs if the whooshing does not occur. sent10: the hell does not occur. sent11: the putting Romaic is caused by the hapticness. sent12: the alighting occurs if the tweeting atorvastatin but not the jointedness happens. sent13: that the homicide does not occur is right. sent14: that the tweeting irrelevance but not the tweeting Garrick occurs is right. sent15: the millennialness happens and the medicolegalness happens. sent16: if the transmuting occurs then the feeding happens. sent17: the hell prevents the feeding. sent18: if the fact that the fact that the hell does not occur and the unpropitiousness does not occur is right is incorrect the feeding does not occur. sent19: that the facelift does not occur is brought about by that the dragging Simenon and the putting sample occurs. sent20: either the exchangeableness or the unpicking or both occurs if the sympatheticness does not occur. sent21: the transmuting occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hell does not occur and the unpropitiousness does not occur does not hold.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the feeding does not occur.; sent16 & sent21 -> int2: the feeding occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the hell does not occur and the unpropitiousness does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the hapticness happens.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the putting Romaic happens.; sent5 & sent14 -> int7: the whooshing does not occur.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the algometricness and the revival occurs.; int8 -> int9: the algometricness happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: both the putting Romaic and the algometricness happens.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the sympatheticness does not occur.; int11 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__