the airlock is a alpha-adrenoceptor that is a kind of a lanthanum.
sent1: if that the fact that something is both not a reluctance and savory is true is incorrect it opens cyberpunk. sent2: the blogger is not a turbine. sent3: that the airlock is not a bulldog but it is a alpha-adrenoceptor is wrong. sent4: that the resorcinol is colorectal is not false. sent5: if the resorcinol is not colorectal then it is shrubby. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a bulldog is colorectal the bap is not a reluctance. sent7: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a alpha-adrenoceptor and it is a lanthanum is not true if it is not a reluctance hold. sent8: something is not non-shrubby if that it does not bulldog and it is colorectal does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it does bulldog and is colorectal. sent10: something is colorectal. sent11: the bap is not a alpha-adrenoceptor if the cloverleaf is both shrubby and a alpha-adrenoceptor. sent12: the resorcinol is not shrubby. sent13: the airlock is a alpha-adrenoceptor. sent14: something is shrubby and a alpha-adrenoceptor if it is not a reluctance. sent15: something is not a bulldog. sent16: if something is not colorectal then it is shrubby. sent17: the resorcinol is a aphasic. sent18: the resorcinol does not Simonize sayeret and does Simonize ascot. sent19: something is not a reluctance and is a bulldog. sent20: the airlock is a alpha-adrenoceptor if the bap is not a reluctance. sent21: there exists something such that it is not non-embolic. sent22: the resorcinol is a alpha-adrenoceptor.
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the resorcinol is not a bulldog but it is colorectal is not true then it is shrubby.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the resorcinol is not a bulldog but it is colorectal does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the resorcinol is shrubby.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the resorcinol is not a bulldog but colorectal.; int4 -> int5: something is not a kind of a bulldog but it is colorectal.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the bap is not a reluctance.;
if that the Son is both not a reluctance and a savory does not hold it does open cyberpunk.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the airlock is a alpha-adrenoceptor that is a kind of a lanthanum. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the fact that something is both not a reluctance and savory is true is incorrect it opens cyberpunk. sent2: the blogger is not a turbine. sent3: that the airlock is not a bulldog but it is a alpha-adrenoceptor is wrong. sent4: that the resorcinol is colorectal is not false. sent5: if the resorcinol is not colorectal then it is shrubby. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a bulldog is colorectal the bap is not a reluctance. sent7: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a alpha-adrenoceptor and it is a lanthanum is not true if it is not a reluctance hold. sent8: something is not non-shrubby if that it does not bulldog and it is colorectal does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it does bulldog and is colorectal. sent10: something is colorectal. sent11: the bap is not a alpha-adrenoceptor if the cloverleaf is both shrubby and a alpha-adrenoceptor. sent12: the resorcinol is not shrubby. sent13: the airlock is a alpha-adrenoceptor. sent14: something is shrubby and a alpha-adrenoceptor if it is not a reluctance. sent15: something is not a bulldog. sent16: if something is not colorectal then it is shrubby. sent17: the resorcinol is a aphasic. sent18: the resorcinol does not Simonize sayeret and does Simonize ascot. sent19: something is not a reluctance and is a bulldog. sent20: the airlock is a alpha-adrenoceptor if the bap is not a reluctance. sent21: there exists something such that it is not non-embolic. sent22: the resorcinol is a alpha-adrenoceptor. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the resorcinol is not a bulldog but it is colorectal is not true then it is shrubby.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the resorcinol is not a bulldog but it is colorectal does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the resorcinol is shrubby.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the resorcinol is not a bulldog but colorectal.; int4 -> int5: something is not a kind of a bulldog but it is colorectal.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the bap is not a reluctance.; __UNKNOWN__