if the blowfish is interfacial then that the chichipe is not a bioluminescence and it does not pair hierocracy does not hold.
sent1: the blowfish does not pair hierocracy if something is not interfacial and not a bioluminescence. sent2: the chichipe is not intractable. sent3: the fact that the blowfish is not apologetic and it is not a kind of a string is right. sent4: that the chichipe is not a bioluminescence and pairs hierocracy is wrong if the blowfish is interfacial. sent5: the fact that the chichipe is not a bioluminescence but it pairs hierocracy is wrong. sent6: that the chichipe is a kind of a bioluminescence that does not pair hierocracy is not right if the fact that the blowfish is interfacial is not incorrect. sent7: the blowfish does pair hierocracy. sent8: the chichipe is interfacial. sent9: the harrow does not pair hierocracy. sent10: if there is something such that it is a kind of a bioluminescence and does not pair hierocracy the blowfish is not interfacial. sent11: the chichipe is not a bioluminescence and does not pair hierocracy if the blowfish is interfacial. sent12: the chichipe does not pair hierocracy. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it does not pair hierocracy is right. sent14: the blowfish is not interfacial if there is something such that it is not a kind of a bioluminescence and it pairs hierocracy. sent15: there is something such that it is not a bioluminescence. sent16: the blowfish is not quartzose. sent17: the fact that the fact that the chichipe is not a kind of a bioluminescence is not false if a non-interfacial thing does not pair hierocracy is not wrong. sent18: if something that is not a bioluminescence does not pair hierocracy the blowfish is interfacial. sent19: something is both not negative and not a cocooning.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the chichipe is not a bioluminescence and does not pair hierocracy.; assump2 -> int1: something is not a kind of a bioluminescence and does not pair hierocracy.;
$hypothesis$ = if the blowfish is interfacial then that the chichipe is not a bioluminescence and it does not pair hierocracy does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the blowfish does not pair hierocracy if something is not interfacial and not a bioluminescence. sent2: the chichipe is not intractable. sent3: the fact that the blowfish is not apologetic and it is not a kind of a string is right. sent4: that the chichipe is not a bioluminescence and pairs hierocracy is wrong if the blowfish is interfacial. sent5: the fact that the chichipe is not a bioluminescence but it pairs hierocracy is wrong. sent6: that the chichipe is a kind of a bioluminescence that does not pair hierocracy is not right if the fact that the blowfish is interfacial is not incorrect. sent7: the blowfish does pair hierocracy. sent8: the chichipe is interfacial. sent9: the harrow does not pair hierocracy. sent10: if there is something such that it is a kind of a bioluminescence and does not pair hierocracy the blowfish is not interfacial. sent11: the chichipe is not a bioluminescence and does not pair hierocracy if the blowfish is interfacial. sent12: the chichipe does not pair hierocracy. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it does not pair hierocracy is right. sent14: the blowfish is not interfacial if there is something such that it is not a kind of a bioluminescence and it pairs hierocracy. sent15: there is something such that it is not a bioluminescence. sent16: the blowfish is not quartzose. sent17: the fact that the fact that the chichipe is not a kind of a bioluminescence is not false if a non-interfacial thing does not pair hierocracy is not wrong. sent18: if something that is not a bioluminescence does not pair hierocracy the blowfish is interfacial. sent19: something is both not negative and not a cocooning. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the chichipe is not a bioluminescence and does not pair hierocracy.; assump2 -> int1: something is not a kind of a bioluminescence and does not pair hierocracy.; __UNKNOWN__