the fact that the puff is not a Francophile and is not acneiform is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that it is episcopal and/or is spermicidal. sent2: the limelight is not a kind of a prick and/or it is not a net if that the granulocyte is not a charge is not wrong. sent3: there exists something such that it does bonnet telephone. sent4: something is not a charge if that it is not viviparous and it is a charge is false. sent5: there is something such that it is episcopal and/or is not spermicidal. sent6: the fact that the granulocyte is non-viviparous a charge is wrong if there is something such that it does not charge. sent7: the fact that something is not unconventional and not non-precocious is not right if that it is not a Swazi is true. sent8: that the fulmar is not a kind of a fire is right if it does not bonnet telephone. sent9: something is not a Leonardo if it is not a kind of a prick or it is non-net or both. sent10: that the neglecter is a bullace but it does not fire does not hold if the vinegarroon is macrocephalic. sent11: the fact that everything is not a Swazi is right. sent12: the fulmar is a pussycat if something is episcopal. sent13: if something is episcopal and/or it is not spermicidal the fulmar is a pussycat. sent14: the fact that the radiocarbon is a bullace is not false. sent15: if the fulmar does not fire the fact that the puff is both not a Francophile and acneiform does not hold. sent16: if the fulmar is not a fire the fact that the puff is both not a Francophile and not acneiform does not hold. sent17: the fact that something is not a kind of a zooplankton or it is macrocephalic or both is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Leonardo. sent18: if the radiocarbon is not parochial then it is not a Jagannath. sent19: if something that is a pussycat does bonnet telephone the radiocarbon is not a bullace. sent20: if the radiocarbon is a pussycat but it does not bonnet telephone then the fulmar is not a kind of a pussycat. sent21: if the fact that the neglecter is not a bullace hold then the radiocarbon is a pussycat that does not bonnet telephone. sent22: the fact that the puff is a kind of a Francophile and is not acneiform is false if the fulmar is not a fire. sent23: the puff is not a Francophile if something is a pussycat and it is a bullace. sent24: the vinegarroon is macrocephalic if that the limelight is not a kind of a zooplankton or it is not macrocephalic or both is incorrect. sent25: the munition does not charge but it clears validation if there exists something such that it is not precocious. sent26: if that something is a kind of conventional thing that is precocious is wrong then it is not precocious.
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the fulmar is a pussycat.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fulmar does bonnet telephone.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fulmar is a kind of a pussycat and it bonnets telephone.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a kind of a pussycat and bonnets telephone.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the radiocarbon is not a bullace.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fulmar does not bonnet telephone.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fulmar is not a kind of a fire.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the puff is not a Francophile and it is not acneiform.
sent9 -> int8: if the limelight either is not a prick or is not a kind of a net or both then the fact that it is not a Leonardo is right.; sent4 -> int9: if the fact that the granulocyte is not viviparous but it is a kind of a charge does not hold it does not charge.; sent11 -> int10: the girandole is not a Swazi.; sent7 -> int11: the fact that the girandole is conventional and it is precocious is not true if it is not a Swazi.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the girandole is conventional and it is precocious is false.; int12 -> int13: there exists nothing such that it is conventional and it is precocious.; int13 -> int14: that the chyme is conventional and it is precocious is not correct.; sent26 -> int15: the chyme is not precocious if that it is conventional and precocious is incorrect.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the chyme is not precocious.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is not precocious.; sent25 & int17 -> int18: the munition is not a charge and does clear validation.; int18 -> int19: the munition does not charge.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it is not a charge.; sent6 & int20 -> int21: that the granulocyte is non-viviparous a charge is not correct.; int9 & int21 -> int22: the granulocyte is not a charge.; sent2 & int22 -> int23: the limelight is either not a prick or not a net or both.; int8 & int23 -> int24: the limelight is not a kind of a Leonardo.; sent17 -> int25: that the limelight is not a zooplankton and/or it is macrocephalic is wrong if it is not a Leonardo.; int24 & int25 -> int26: the fact that the limelight is not a kind of a zooplankton or is macrocephalic or both is not correct.; int26 & sent24 -> int27: the vinegarroon is macrocephalic.; int27 & sent10 -> int28: the fact that the neglecter is a bullace but it is not a kind of a fire does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the puff is not a Francophile and is not acneiform is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is episcopal and/or is spermicidal. sent2: the limelight is not a kind of a prick and/or it is not a net if that the granulocyte is not a charge is not wrong. sent3: there exists something such that it does bonnet telephone. sent4: something is not a charge if that it is not viviparous and it is a charge is false. sent5: there is something such that it is episcopal and/or is not spermicidal. sent6: the fact that the granulocyte is non-viviparous a charge is wrong if there is something such that it does not charge. sent7: the fact that something is not unconventional and not non-precocious is not right if that it is not a Swazi is true. sent8: that the fulmar is not a kind of a fire is right if it does not bonnet telephone. sent9: something is not a Leonardo if it is not a kind of a prick or it is non-net or both. sent10: that the neglecter is a bullace but it does not fire does not hold if the vinegarroon is macrocephalic. sent11: the fact that everything is not a Swazi is right. sent12: the fulmar is a pussycat if something is episcopal. sent13: if something is episcopal and/or it is not spermicidal the fulmar is a pussycat. sent14: the fact that the radiocarbon is a bullace is not false. sent15: if the fulmar does not fire the fact that the puff is both not a Francophile and acneiform does not hold. sent16: if the fulmar is not a fire the fact that the puff is both not a Francophile and not acneiform does not hold. sent17: the fact that something is not a kind of a zooplankton or it is macrocephalic or both is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Leonardo. sent18: if the radiocarbon is not parochial then it is not a Jagannath. sent19: if something that is a pussycat does bonnet telephone the radiocarbon is not a bullace. sent20: if the radiocarbon is a pussycat but it does not bonnet telephone then the fulmar is not a kind of a pussycat. sent21: if the fact that the neglecter is not a bullace hold then the radiocarbon is a pussycat that does not bonnet telephone. sent22: the fact that the puff is a kind of a Francophile and is not acneiform is false if the fulmar is not a fire. sent23: the puff is not a Francophile if something is a pussycat and it is a bullace. sent24: the vinegarroon is macrocephalic if that the limelight is not a kind of a zooplankton or it is not macrocephalic or both is incorrect. sent25: the munition does not charge but it clears validation if there exists something such that it is not precocious. sent26: if that something is a kind of conventional thing that is precocious is wrong then it is not precocious. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the fulmar is a pussycat.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fulmar does bonnet telephone.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fulmar is a kind of a pussycat and it bonnets telephone.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a kind of a pussycat and bonnets telephone.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the radiocarbon is not a bullace.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fulmar does not bonnet telephone.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fulmar is not a kind of a fire.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__