the catalyzing postmodernism occurs.
sent1: the catalyzing focused occurs. sent2: the people does not occur and/or the prevention happens. sent3: the people does not occur if the people does not occur or the prevention occurs or both. sent4: the whistling occurs. sent5: that the catalyzing high-low does not occur and the infiltration happens is triggered by that the people does not occur. sent6: the rh-negativeness does not occur. sent7: the fact that that the abrading happens and the Leviticalness occurs is not correct is true if the positioning does not occur. sent8: the wideness occurs and/or the catalyzing abuse happens. sent9: both the on-streetness and the tangentialness happens. sent10: the subsidence does not occur. sent11: the arc does not occur if the tribalness does not occur. sent12: if the fact that both the journalism and the vacating happens does not hold the catalyzing postmodernism does not occur. sent13: that both the clouting and the catachresticness occurs is false. sent14: if the colonoscopy does not occur and/or the catalyzing paratrooper happens the colonoscopy does not occur. sent15: if the spectrometricness does not occur and the catalyzing Tuesday does not occur the catalyzing postmodernism occurs. sent16: the catalyzing Tuesday does not occur if the fact that both the clouting and the catachresticness occurs is wrong. sent17: that the spectrometricness occurs is prevented by that the journalism and the infiltration occurs. sent18: both the rat-a-tat-tat and the seismologicalness happens. sent19: the instrumenting ambusher does not occur. sent20: the vacating does not occur if the fact that the sporting happens and the fingerprinting Australopithecus occurs does not hold. sent21: the call-back happens. sent22: that the whistling does not occur is prevented by that the vacating happens but the journalism does not occur. sent23: the fingerprinting pleurocarp does not occur if the acrophony does not occur. sent24: if the luck does not occur and/or the slicing aircraftsman happens then the luck does not occur. sent25: the vacating occurs. sent26: if that the fingerprinting arsenate occurs and the slicing aircraftsman happens is false the fact that the tastefulness does not occur is not wrong. sent27: that both the sport and the fingerprinting Australopithecus happens does not hold if the journalism does not occur. sent28: the catalyzing Tuesday is brought about by the catalyzing high-low. sent29: the SCNT does not occur. sent30: the non-Galwegianness is brought about by that the fingerprinting enzymology does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the journalism does not occur.; sent27 & assump1 -> int1: that both the sport and the fingerprinting Australopithecus occurs is false.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the vacating does not occur.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the journalism happens.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the people does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: not the catalyzing high-low but the infiltration happens.; int6 -> int7: the infiltration happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the journalism occurs and the infiltration happens.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the spectrometricness does not occur.; sent16 & sent13 -> int10: the catalyzing Tuesday does not occur.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the spectrometricness does not occur and the catalyzing Tuesday does not occur.; int11 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
that the whistling occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = the catalyzing postmodernism occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the catalyzing focused occurs. sent2: the people does not occur and/or the prevention happens. sent3: the people does not occur if the people does not occur or the prevention occurs or both. sent4: the whistling occurs. sent5: that the catalyzing high-low does not occur and the infiltration happens is triggered by that the people does not occur. sent6: the rh-negativeness does not occur. sent7: the fact that that the abrading happens and the Leviticalness occurs is not correct is true if the positioning does not occur. sent8: the wideness occurs and/or the catalyzing abuse happens. sent9: both the on-streetness and the tangentialness happens. sent10: the subsidence does not occur. sent11: the arc does not occur if the tribalness does not occur. sent12: if the fact that both the journalism and the vacating happens does not hold the catalyzing postmodernism does not occur. sent13: that both the clouting and the catachresticness occurs is false. sent14: if the colonoscopy does not occur and/or the catalyzing paratrooper happens the colonoscopy does not occur. sent15: if the spectrometricness does not occur and the catalyzing Tuesday does not occur the catalyzing postmodernism occurs. sent16: the catalyzing Tuesday does not occur if the fact that both the clouting and the catachresticness occurs is wrong. sent17: that the spectrometricness occurs is prevented by that the journalism and the infiltration occurs. sent18: both the rat-a-tat-tat and the seismologicalness happens. sent19: the instrumenting ambusher does not occur. sent20: the vacating does not occur if the fact that the sporting happens and the fingerprinting Australopithecus occurs does not hold. sent21: the call-back happens. sent22: that the whistling does not occur is prevented by that the vacating happens but the journalism does not occur. sent23: the fingerprinting pleurocarp does not occur if the acrophony does not occur. sent24: if the luck does not occur and/or the slicing aircraftsman happens then the luck does not occur. sent25: the vacating occurs. sent26: if that the fingerprinting arsenate occurs and the slicing aircraftsman happens is false the fact that the tastefulness does not occur is not wrong. sent27: that both the sport and the fingerprinting Australopithecus happens does not hold if the journalism does not occur. sent28: the catalyzing Tuesday is brought about by the catalyzing high-low. sent29: the SCNT does not occur. sent30: the non-Galwegianness is brought about by that the fingerprinting enzymology does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the journalism does not occur.; sent27 & assump1 -> int1: that both the sport and the fingerprinting Australopithecus occurs is false.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the vacating does not occur.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the journalism happens.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the people does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: not the catalyzing high-low but the infiltration happens.; int6 -> int7: the infiltration happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the journalism occurs and the infiltration happens.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the spectrometricness does not occur.; sent16 & sent13 -> int10: the catalyzing Tuesday does not occur.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the spectrometricness does not occur and the catalyzing Tuesday does not occur.; int11 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__