the reformer is non-Hasidic thing that is a fox-trot.
sent1: if the proconsul is not unreliable the fact that that the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah and it is not significant is wrong hold. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a Shina that the eel is a guesstimate that is not a passe-partout is incorrect. sent3: the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah and it is not significant if the joker is not a guesstimate. sent4: if the fact that something is a Austin that is ponderable is right the proconsul is not unreliable. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is a guesstimate and it is not a passe-partout is not true then the joker is not a guesstimate. sent6: if the torpedo is non-Hasidic the reformer is not non-Hasidic but a fox-trot. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a Shina. sent8: that the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah is not wrong. sent9: the fact that something is not Hasidic but it is a fox-trot is false if it is not a kind of a Austin. sent10: the anamorphism is billiards. sent11: the torpedo is not unreliable if the fact that the anamorphism is both significant and unreliable is not right. sent12: that the anamorphism is a Austin hold if the torpedo is Hasidic. sent13: the joker is not ponderable if there exists something such that the fact that it is ponderable and it is not a guesstimate is incorrect. sent14: the torpedo is not a fox-trot. sent15: the fact that that the anamorphism is significant and it is unreliable is not incorrect does not hold if something does not bonnet Utah. sent16: if that the anamorphism is not unreliable is correct the fact that the proconsul is not a Austin is true. sent17: the anamorphism is ponderable if it is billiards. sent18: there exists something such that that it is ponderable and it is not significant is wrong. sent19: there is something such that it is significant. sent20: that the proconsul is billiards and it is ponderable does not hold. sent21: the joker is not a kind of a Austin. sent22: if the lobule is Hasidic it is ponderable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the torpedo is Hasidic.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the anamorphism is a kind of a Austin.; sent17 & sent10 -> int2: the anamorphism is ponderable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the anamorphism is a kind of a Austin and it is ponderable.; int3 -> int4: the fact that something is a Austin and it is ponderable hold.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the proconsul is not unreliable.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah and it is not significant is incorrect.; sent7 & sent2 -> int7: that the eel is both a guesstimate and not a passe-partout is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a guesstimate but not a passe-partout is incorrect.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: that the joker is not a kind of a guesstimate hold.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah and it is not significant.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the torpedo is not Hasidic.; int12 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the reformer is a kind of non-Hasidic a fox-trot is not right.
sent9 -> int13: if the reformer is not a Austin the fact that it is both non-Hasidic and a fox-trot does not hold.; sent8 -> int14: something does not bonnet Utah.; int14 & sent15 -> int15: that the anamorphism is significant and it is not reliable does not hold.; sent11 & int15 -> int16: the torpedo is not unreliable.; sent20 -> int17: there is something such that that it is billiards and it is ponderable is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the reformer is non-Hasidic thing that is a fox-trot. ; $context$ = sent1: if the proconsul is not unreliable the fact that that the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah and it is not significant is wrong hold. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a Shina that the eel is a guesstimate that is not a passe-partout is incorrect. sent3: the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah and it is not significant if the joker is not a guesstimate. sent4: if the fact that something is a Austin that is ponderable is right the proconsul is not unreliable. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is a guesstimate and it is not a passe-partout is not true then the joker is not a guesstimate. sent6: if the torpedo is non-Hasidic the reformer is not non-Hasidic but a fox-trot. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a Shina. sent8: that the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah is not wrong. sent9: the fact that something is not Hasidic but it is a fox-trot is false if it is not a kind of a Austin. sent10: the anamorphism is billiards. sent11: the torpedo is not unreliable if the fact that the anamorphism is both significant and unreliable is not right. sent12: that the anamorphism is a Austin hold if the torpedo is Hasidic. sent13: the joker is not ponderable if there exists something such that the fact that it is ponderable and it is not a guesstimate is incorrect. sent14: the torpedo is not a fox-trot. sent15: the fact that that the anamorphism is significant and it is unreliable is not incorrect does not hold if something does not bonnet Utah. sent16: if that the anamorphism is not unreliable is correct the fact that the proconsul is not a Austin is true. sent17: the anamorphism is ponderable if it is billiards. sent18: there exists something such that that it is ponderable and it is not significant is wrong. sent19: there is something such that it is significant. sent20: that the proconsul is billiards and it is ponderable does not hold. sent21: the joker is not a kind of a Austin. sent22: if the lobule is Hasidic it is ponderable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the torpedo is Hasidic.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the anamorphism is a kind of a Austin.; sent17 & sent10 -> int2: the anamorphism is ponderable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the anamorphism is a kind of a Austin and it is ponderable.; int3 -> int4: the fact that something is a Austin and it is ponderable hold.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the proconsul is not unreliable.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah and it is not significant is incorrect.; sent7 & sent2 -> int7: that the eel is both a guesstimate and not a passe-partout is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a guesstimate but not a passe-partout is incorrect.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: that the joker is not a kind of a guesstimate hold.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the neoliberal does not bonnet Utah and it is not significant.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the torpedo is not Hasidic.; int12 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__