the carnosaur does not bark debt.
sent1: the carnosaur does desquamate if it is not a raspberry. sent2: that the pantheist does not desquamate is correct. sent3: something rehearses if the fact that it is not a kind of a upsetter is right. sent4: that the pantheist is a kind of a locomotion but it is not a kind of a draftee does not hold. sent5: the carnosaur is a draftee if something is a draftee. sent6: if something is a kind of a upsetter that is a raspberry then it is not a kind of a draftee. sent7: something desquamates and it barks debt if it is not a kind of a raspberry. sent8: the flogger does desquamate. sent9: the flogger rehearses and is antigenic. sent10: if something is not a raspberry it is antigenic and a upsetter. sent11: if that the fact that the pantheist is not antigenic but it is a upsetter hold is wrong then the carnosaur does not rehearse. sent12: the flogger barks debt if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does rehearse and it does not barks debt is not wrong does not hold. sent13: that the carnosaur is a kind of a upsetter is correct if the flogger does rehearse. sent14: the flogger is not a raspberry and is not a draftee if the pantheist does not desquamate. sent15: the pantheist is a raspberry. sent16: the swot twines NASA and it impoverishes. sent17: the carnosaur is a draftee if there exists something such that that it is a locomotion and it is not a draftee is false.
sent9 -> int1: the flogger rehearses.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the carnosaur is a upsetter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the carnosaur is a raspberry is not incorrect.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the carnosaur is a upsetter and it is a kind of a raspberry.; sent6 -> int4: the carnosaur is not a draftee if it is a upsetter and it is a raspberry.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the carnosaur is not a draftee.; sent4 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is a locomotion and it is not a draftee does not hold.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the carnosaur is a draftee.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the carnosaur is not a raspberry.; sent7 -> int10: the carnosaur does desquamate and does bark debt if it is not a kind of a raspberry.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the carnosaur desquamates and it barks debt.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the carnosaur does not bark debt.
sent10 -> int12: if the flogger is not a raspberry then it is antigenic and it is a kind of a upsetter.; sent14 & sent2 -> int13: the flogger is both not a raspberry and not a draftee.; int13 -> int14: the flogger is not a kind of a raspberry.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the flogger is antigenic and is a upsetter.; int15 -> int16: the flogger is antigenic.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is antigenic.;
$hypothesis$ = the carnosaur does not bark debt. ; $context$ = sent1: the carnosaur does desquamate if it is not a raspberry. sent2: that the pantheist does not desquamate is correct. sent3: something rehearses if the fact that it is not a kind of a upsetter is right. sent4: that the pantheist is a kind of a locomotion but it is not a kind of a draftee does not hold. sent5: the carnosaur is a draftee if something is a draftee. sent6: if something is a kind of a upsetter that is a raspberry then it is not a kind of a draftee. sent7: something desquamates and it barks debt if it is not a kind of a raspberry. sent8: the flogger does desquamate. sent9: the flogger rehearses and is antigenic. sent10: if something is not a raspberry it is antigenic and a upsetter. sent11: if that the fact that the pantheist is not antigenic but it is a upsetter hold is wrong then the carnosaur does not rehearse. sent12: the flogger barks debt if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does rehearse and it does not barks debt is not wrong does not hold. sent13: that the carnosaur is a kind of a upsetter is correct if the flogger does rehearse. sent14: the flogger is not a raspberry and is not a draftee if the pantheist does not desquamate. sent15: the pantheist is a raspberry. sent16: the swot twines NASA and it impoverishes. sent17: the carnosaur is a draftee if there exists something such that that it is a locomotion and it is not a draftee is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the flogger rehearses.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the carnosaur is a upsetter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the carnosaur is a raspberry is not incorrect.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the carnosaur is a upsetter and it is a kind of a raspberry.; sent6 -> int4: the carnosaur is not a draftee if it is a upsetter and it is a raspberry.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the carnosaur is not a draftee.; sent4 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is a locomotion and it is not a draftee does not hold.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the carnosaur is a draftee.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the carnosaur is not a raspberry.; sent7 -> int10: the carnosaur does desquamate and does bark debt if it is not a kind of a raspberry.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the carnosaur desquamates and it barks debt.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__