the scorcher does not occur.
sent1: the frazzle does not occur. sent2: the fact that the expiatoriness does not occur and the infinitivalness happens is not correct if the barring ascot occurs. sent3: the barring ascot but not the batching pop-up happens. sent4: if the frazzling does not occur then the exhumation does not occur and the esophagealness does not occur. sent5: if the Ramadan does not occur then the fact that the fact that the exhumation does not occur and the esophagealness does not occur is not correct hold. sent6: the expiatoriness occurs if that both the expiatorinessness and the infinitivalness happens is not right. sent7: that the batching nutritiousness does not occur triggers that the batching septet does not occur and the batching joule does not occur. sent8: the staggering offertory does not occur. sent9: if the Ramadan happens and the expiatoriness happens then the scorcher does not occur. sent10: if the barring countersignature does not occur the fact that the barring strudel happens and the batching horse-pistol does not occur is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Ramadan does not occur is not wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the exhumation does not occur and the esophagealness does not occur is false.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the exhumation does not occur and the esophagealness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Ramadan occurs.; sent3 -> int5: the barring ascot happens.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the fact that both the non-expiatoryness and the infinitivalness occurs hold is not correct.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the expiatoriness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the Ramadan happens and the expiatoriness happens.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the scorcher does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the frazzle does not occur. sent2: the fact that the expiatoriness does not occur and the infinitivalness happens is not correct if the barring ascot occurs. sent3: the barring ascot but not the batching pop-up happens. sent4: if the frazzling does not occur then the exhumation does not occur and the esophagealness does not occur. sent5: if the Ramadan does not occur then the fact that the fact that the exhumation does not occur and the esophagealness does not occur is not correct hold. sent6: the expiatoriness occurs if that both the expiatorinessness and the infinitivalness happens is not right. sent7: that the batching nutritiousness does not occur triggers that the batching septet does not occur and the batching joule does not occur. sent8: the staggering offertory does not occur. sent9: if the Ramadan happens and the expiatoriness happens then the scorcher does not occur. sent10: if the barring countersignature does not occur the fact that the barring strudel happens and the batching horse-pistol does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Ramadan does not occur is not wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the exhumation does not occur and the esophagealness does not occur is false.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the exhumation does not occur and the esophagealness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Ramadan occurs.; sent3 -> int5: the barring ascot happens.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the fact that both the non-expiatoryness and the infinitivalness occurs hold is not correct.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the expiatoriness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the Ramadan happens and the expiatoriness happens.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__