the weakener piles.
sent1: something does not pile if it is not a scow and is stingy. sent2: the weakener enfranchises asthenosphere if the fact that the trombiculid is not a macroevolution and it is not a kind of a gooseberry is not right. sent3: if something is not stingy that it is a scow and is a kind of a recessive is false. sent4: if the trombiculid is anemophilous then that it is not a kind of a macroevolution and is not a gooseberry is not true. sent5: if the sandwichman is a kind of a pacifist then the trombiculid is anemophilous. sent6: if something enfranchises asthenosphere it is recessive. sent7: the fact that the sandwichman enfranchises asthenosphere does not hold if that the trombiculid is a kind of a scow that is recessive is not true. sent8: if that the trombiculid is stingy is true then the fact that it is a snapshot and it is not a kind of a Dreyfus is wrong. sent9: the weakener is a macroevolution and it is a kind of a gooseberry if the sandwichman does not enfranchise asthenosphere. sent10: something is lexicostatistic but it is not a macroevolution if it is stingy. sent11: if the sandwichman is a kind of an amethyst then it is a pacifist. sent12: everything is a snapshot and it is not a Dreyfus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the trombiculid is stingy is right.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the trombiculid is a kind of a snapshot but it is not a Dreyfus is not correct.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the trombiculid is a kind of a snapshot and is not a Dreyfus is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the trombiculid is not stingy.; sent3 -> int5: that the trombiculid is a scow and it is a recessive is not correct if it is not stingy.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the trombiculid is a kind of a scow and it is a recessive is not right.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the sandwichman does not enfranchise asthenosphere.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the weakener is a macroevolution and a gooseberry is true.; int8 -> int9: the weakener is a gooseberry.;
the sandwichman is lexicostatistic but not a macroevolution.
sent10 -> int10: the sandwichman is lexicostatistic and is not a macroevolution if it is stingy.;
$hypothesis$ = the weakener piles. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not pile if it is not a scow and is stingy. sent2: the weakener enfranchises asthenosphere if the fact that the trombiculid is not a macroevolution and it is not a kind of a gooseberry is not right. sent3: if something is not stingy that it is a scow and is a kind of a recessive is false. sent4: if the trombiculid is anemophilous then that it is not a kind of a macroevolution and is not a gooseberry is not true. sent5: if the sandwichman is a kind of a pacifist then the trombiculid is anemophilous. sent6: if something enfranchises asthenosphere it is recessive. sent7: the fact that the sandwichman enfranchises asthenosphere does not hold if that the trombiculid is a kind of a scow that is recessive is not true. sent8: if that the trombiculid is stingy is true then the fact that it is a snapshot and it is not a kind of a Dreyfus is wrong. sent9: the weakener is a macroevolution and it is a kind of a gooseberry if the sandwichman does not enfranchise asthenosphere. sent10: something is lexicostatistic but it is not a macroevolution if it is stingy. sent11: if the sandwichman is a kind of an amethyst then it is a pacifist. sent12: everything is a snapshot and it is not a Dreyfus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the trombiculid is stingy is right.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the trombiculid is a kind of a snapshot but it is not a Dreyfus is not correct.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the trombiculid is a kind of a snapshot and is not a Dreyfus is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the trombiculid is not stingy.; sent3 -> int5: that the trombiculid is a scow and it is a recessive is not correct if it is not stingy.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the trombiculid is a kind of a scow and it is a recessive is not right.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the sandwichman does not enfranchise asthenosphere.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the weakener is a macroevolution and a gooseberry is true.; int8 -> int9: the weakener is a gooseberry.; __UNKNOWN__