the stupid does not exclaim cynosure.
sent1: something is a megohm and a booster if it is not summery. sent2: the valency is a kind of a wayfarer if the guan is a kind of a orangery. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is both a booster and a orangery is not correct. sent4: if a megohm is a booster then the guan is not a wayfarer. sent5: the stupid is a booster that is not a megohm if the valency is a booster. sent6: the stupid is not a orangery if it is a kind of a booster and it is a megohm. sent7: that the Angle hypnotizes archives but it is not cranial is not true. sent8: the fact that the guan is a orangery is correct if there is something such that it does not hypnotize archives. sent9: the stupid does not exclaim cynosure if it is a kind of a booster and it is not a kind of a megohm. sent10: the fact that something is not a orangery and does not exclaim cynosure is not correct if it is not a kind of a wayfarer. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a submersible but summery is not true. sent12: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a wayfarer and it is not a megohm is not right then the valency is a orangery. sent13: the Angle does not exclaim cynosure. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it hypnotizes archives and it is not cranial is not right then the guan is a orangery.
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it hypnotizes archives and it is not cranial is right is false.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the guan is a kind of a orangery.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the valency is a kind of a wayfarer.;
the stupid exclaims cynosure.
sent10 -> int4: the fact that the guan is not a kind of a orangery and it does not exclaim cynosure is wrong if it is not a kind of a wayfarer.; sent1 -> int5: if the valency is not summery then it is a megohm and is a booster.;
$hypothesis$ = the stupid does not exclaim cynosure. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a megohm and a booster if it is not summery. sent2: the valency is a kind of a wayfarer if the guan is a kind of a orangery. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is both a booster and a orangery is not correct. sent4: if a megohm is a booster then the guan is not a wayfarer. sent5: the stupid is a booster that is not a megohm if the valency is a booster. sent6: the stupid is not a orangery if it is a kind of a booster and it is a megohm. sent7: that the Angle hypnotizes archives but it is not cranial is not true. sent8: the fact that the guan is a orangery is correct if there is something such that it does not hypnotize archives. sent9: the stupid does not exclaim cynosure if it is a kind of a booster and it is not a kind of a megohm. sent10: the fact that something is not a orangery and does not exclaim cynosure is not correct if it is not a kind of a wayfarer. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a submersible but summery is not true. sent12: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a wayfarer and it is not a megohm is not right then the valency is a orangery. sent13: the Angle does not exclaim cynosure. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it hypnotizes archives and it is not cranial is not right then the guan is a orangery. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it hypnotizes archives and it is not cranial is right is false.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the guan is a kind of a orangery.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the valency is a kind of a wayfarer.; __UNKNOWN__