the incomprehensibleness happens.
sent1: that the investigating meteorite does not occur leads to the non-Kurdishness. sent2: the surmounting does not occur. sent3: if the Kurdishness does not occur the kineticness does not occur and the diffusing Parliamentarian does not occur. sent4: if the fact that not the revaluing but the kineticness occurs is wrong then the kineticness does not occur. sent5: the scanning does not occur if the invigilation occurs. sent6: the revaluing but not the diffusing briber happens if the mnemonicsness happens. sent7: the kineticness does not occur. sent8: that the incomprehensibleness happens is brought about by the revaluing. sent9: the landlessness but not the mediatorialness happens. sent10: the investigating viand does not occur and the investigating meteorite does not occur. sent11: the eparchialness occurs and the shrieking does not occur if the animatingness occurs. sent12: the non-mnemonicsness is triggered by the diffusing briber. sent13: the diffusing briber happens if the managerialness does not occur. sent14: that the mnemonicsness happens is caused by that the kineticness does not occur and the diffusing Parliamentarian does not occur. sent15: if the mnemonics does not occur then that not the revaluing but the kineticness occurs is wrong.
sent10 -> int1: the investigating meteorite does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Kurdish does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the kineticness does not occur and the diffusing Parliamentarian does not occur.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the mnemonics happens hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the revaluing but not the diffusing briber happens.; int5 -> int6: the revaluing happens.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the incomprehensibleness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the incomprehensibleness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the investigating meteorite does not occur leads to the non-Kurdishness. sent2: the surmounting does not occur. sent3: if the Kurdishness does not occur the kineticness does not occur and the diffusing Parliamentarian does not occur. sent4: if the fact that not the revaluing but the kineticness occurs is wrong then the kineticness does not occur. sent5: the scanning does not occur if the invigilation occurs. sent6: the revaluing but not the diffusing briber happens if the mnemonicsness happens. sent7: the kineticness does not occur. sent8: that the incomprehensibleness happens is brought about by the revaluing. sent9: the landlessness but not the mediatorialness happens. sent10: the investigating viand does not occur and the investigating meteorite does not occur. sent11: the eparchialness occurs and the shrieking does not occur if the animatingness occurs. sent12: the non-mnemonicsness is triggered by the diffusing briber. sent13: the diffusing briber happens if the managerialness does not occur. sent14: that the mnemonicsness happens is caused by that the kineticness does not occur and the diffusing Parliamentarian does not occur. sent15: if the mnemonics does not occur then that not the revaluing but the kineticness occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the investigating meteorite does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Kurdish does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the kineticness does not occur and the diffusing Parliamentarian does not occur.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the mnemonics happens hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the revaluing but not the diffusing briber happens.; int5 -> int6: the revaluing happens.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__