that the pavlova is an interesting and does not grade sunray is not right.
sent1: something is not a bell if it does count whalesucker and it is not a ATP. sent2: if the opacification is a kind of an encyclical the diffuser is not a ATP. sent3: if something that counts whalesucker is a ATP it does not bell. sent4: if the opacification is a kind of an encyclical then the diffuser counts whalesucker but it is not a kind of a ATP. sent5: that if the strychnine is not a pulp then the fact that the pavlova is an interesting that does not grade sunray is not true is right. sent6: something is not a pulp if it does not stumble gastrostomy. sent7: if that the whalesucker is not an encyclical is correct the opacification is a kind of a playboy. sent8: the fact that the pavlova interests and it grades sunray is false. sent9: that the whalesucker is not a kind of a sprawling and does grade double-prop is wrong. sent10: that the opacification is a kind of a playboy is not incorrect. sent11: if the strychnine is not a pulp that the fact that the pavlova is an interesting and it does grade sunray is false is not wrong. sent12: something is not a pulp if the fact that it is not a bell and it stumbles gastrostomy is not correct. sent13: if that the strychnine does not stumble gastrostomy is not false then it does not pulp. sent14: the diffuser is not a kind of a ATP. sent15: something does interest but it does not grade sunray if the fact that it is a sty is not incorrect. sent16: the diffuser is not a bell if it does count whalesucker and is a ATP. sent17: there exists something such that it is a sty. sent18: something is not a sty. sent19: the fact that the opacification is a kind of a playboy and it is an encyclical is not false if the whalesucker is not an encyclical. sent20: that the strychnine does not bell but it stumbles gastrostomy is not right if the diffuser is not a bell.
sent1 -> int1: if the diffuser does count whalesucker but it is not a ATP then it does not bell.; sent12 -> int2: the strychnine is not a pulp if the fact that it is not a bell and does stumble gastrostomy does not hold.;
the pavlova is a kind of an interesting that does not grade sunray.
sent15 -> int3: the pavlova does interest and does not grade sunray if that it is a sty is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pavlova is an interesting and does not grade sunray is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a bell if it does count whalesucker and it is not a ATP. sent2: if the opacification is a kind of an encyclical the diffuser is not a ATP. sent3: if something that counts whalesucker is a ATP it does not bell. sent4: if the opacification is a kind of an encyclical then the diffuser counts whalesucker but it is not a kind of a ATP. sent5: that if the strychnine is not a pulp then the fact that the pavlova is an interesting that does not grade sunray is not true is right. sent6: something is not a pulp if it does not stumble gastrostomy. sent7: if that the whalesucker is not an encyclical is correct the opacification is a kind of a playboy. sent8: the fact that the pavlova interests and it grades sunray is false. sent9: that the whalesucker is not a kind of a sprawling and does grade double-prop is wrong. sent10: that the opacification is a kind of a playboy is not incorrect. sent11: if the strychnine is not a pulp that the fact that the pavlova is an interesting and it does grade sunray is false is not wrong. sent12: something is not a pulp if the fact that it is not a bell and it stumbles gastrostomy is not correct. sent13: if that the strychnine does not stumble gastrostomy is not false then it does not pulp. sent14: the diffuser is not a kind of a ATP. sent15: something does interest but it does not grade sunray if the fact that it is a sty is not incorrect. sent16: the diffuser is not a bell if it does count whalesucker and is a ATP. sent17: there exists something such that it is a sty. sent18: something is not a sty. sent19: the fact that the opacification is a kind of a playboy and it is an encyclical is not false if the whalesucker is not an encyclical. sent20: that the strychnine does not bell but it stumbles gastrostomy is not right if the diffuser is not a bell. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the diffuser does count whalesucker but it is not a ATP then it does not bell.; sent12 -> int2: the strychnine is not a pulp if the fact that it is not a bell and does stumble gastrostomy does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__