there exists something such that if it is tights then it compensates abscission.
sent1: that something is not a Teutonist but it is retentive is not right if it is tights. sent2: if something is a Teutonist then it is a kind of a landing. sent3: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Teutonist and is not unretentive is not true then it does land. sent4: the fact that something is both a Teutonist and retentive is wrong if it is tights.
sent1 -> int1: if the greengrocery is tights the fact that it is not a Teutonist and it is retentive is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the greengrocery is tights is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the greengrocery is not a Teutonist but it is retentive is not true.; sent3 -> int3: if the fact that the greengrocery is not a Teutonist and not unretentive is incorrect then that it is a landing is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the greengrocery does land.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is tights then it compensates abscission. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a Teutonist but it is retentive is not right if it is tights. sent2: if something is a Teutonist then it is a kind of a landing. sent3: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Teutonist and is not unretentive is not true then it does land. sent4: the fact that something is both a Teutonist and retentive is wrong if it is tights. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the greengrocery is tights the fact that it is not a Teutonist and it is retentive is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the greengrocery is tights is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the greengrocery is not a Teutonist but it is retentive is not true.; sent3 -> int3: if the fact that the greengrocery is not a Teutonist and not unretentive is incorrect then that it is a landing is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the greengrocery does land.; __UNKNOWN__