the ayah pleases.
sent1: something is not a kind of a Crawford if the fact that it is not wearable and it does interpret parliamentarian does not hold. sent2: if that the Service does not please is not wrong the ayah is not wearable. sent3: the ayah is a Cronyn. sent4: that the Service is a kind of a Crawford and it is a kind of a Bruneian is wrong. sent5: the probationer does dun Bethune if there is something such that the fact that it is not non-Bruneian is not false. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it bethinks is not incorrect. sent7: if the probationer does dun Bethune then that the umbrellawort is not wearable but it interprets parliamentarian is false. sent8: if there is something such that it bethinks the fact that the rima is earlier and subdivides Maalox is wrong. sent9: if the umbrellawort is a sourwood then the probationer does interpret parliamentarian. sent10: the umbrellawort is a sourwood if the rima is a Crawford. sent11: if something is not unwearable then the fact that either it does not dun Bethune or it is a Bruneian or both is incorrect. sent12: the cuppa is not cardiopulmonary if that the Service does not dun Bethune and/or is a kind of a Bruneian is false. sent13: the fact that the rima is a kind of earlier thing that subdivides Maalox is incorrect. sent14: the probationer is a kind of a sourwood if the umbrellawort does interpret parliamentarian. sent15: if something is earlier then it is a kind of a Crawford. sent16: the fact that the Service is wearable is true if that the probationer interprets parliamentarian is right. sent17: if that something is non-earlier thing that subdivides Maalox is wrong it is a Crawford. sent18: if the cuppa is not cardiopulmonary the ayah does not please. sent19: if something does bethink then the fact that the rima is not earlier and does subdivide Maalox is incorrect.
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the rima is not earlier but it subdivides Maalox is not right it is a Crawford.; sent6 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the rima is not earlier but it subdivides Maalox is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the rima is a Crawford is right.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the umbrellawort is a sourwood.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the probationer interprets parliamentarian.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: that the Service is wearable is correct.; sent11 -> int7: the fact that the Service does not dun Bethune or it is a Bruneian or both is not true if it is wearable.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the Service does not dun Bethune and/or it is a kind of a Bruneian does not hold.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the cuppa is not cardiopulmonary.; int9 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
that the ayah pleases is correct.
sent1 -> int10: the umbrellawort is not a Crawford if the fact that it is not wearable and does interpret parliamentarian is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the ayah pleases. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a Crawford if the fact that it is not wearable and it does interpret parliamentarian does not hold. sent2: if that the Service does not please is not wrong the ayah is not wearable. sent3: the ayah is a Cronyn. sent4: that the Service is a kind of a Crawford and it is a kind of a Bruneian is wrong. sent5: the probationer does dun Bethune if there is something such that the fact that it is not non-Bruneian is not false. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it bethinks is not incorrect. sent7: if the probationer does dun Bethune then that the umbrellawort is not wearable but it interprets parliamentarian is false. sent8: if there is something such that it bethinks the fact that the rima is earlier and subdivides Maalox is wrong. sent9: if the umbrellawort is a sourwood then the probationer does interpret parliamentarian. sent10: the umbrellawort is a sourwood if the rima is a Crawford. sent11: if something is not unwearable then the fact that either it does not dun Bethune or it is a Bruneian or both is incorrect. sent12: the cuppa is not cardiopulmonary if that the Service does not dun Bethune and/or is a kind of a Bruneian is false. sent13: the fact that the rima is a kind of earlier thing that subdivides Maalox is incorrect. sent14: the probationer is a kind of a sourwood if the umbrellawort does interpret parliamentarian. sent15: if something is earlier then it is a kind of a Crawford. sent16: the fact that the Service is wearable is true if that the probationer interprets parliamentarian is right. sent17: if that something is non-earlier thing that subdivides Maalox is wrong it is a Crawford. sent18: if the cuppa is not cardiopulmonary the ayah does not please. sent19: if something does bethink then the fact that the rima is not earlier and does subdivide Maalox is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the rima is not earlier but it subdivides Maalox is not right it is a Crawford.; sent6 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the rima is not earlier but it subdivides Maalox is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the rima is a Crawford is right.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the umbrellawort is a sourwood.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the probationer interprets parliamentarian.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: that the Service is wearable is correct.; sent11 -> int7: the fact that the Service does not dun Bethune or it is a Bruneian or both is not true if it is wearable.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the Service does not dun Bethune and/or it is a kind of a Bruneian does not hold.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the cuppa is not cardiopulmonary.; int9 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__