the cockpit does not stab sacrilegiousness.
sent1: if something that condemns rest-cure does not refer it does not inhale multiple. sent2: the fact that something is a crumb or does not stab sacrilegiousness or both is false if it is an agriculture. sent3: the mead is a schizanthus if something either is a schizanthus or is not alienable or both. sent4: the cockpit is skeletal and it is an agriculture if the maser does not inhale multiple. sent5: the batik is a schizanthus and it is alienable. sent6: the lexicalization stabs sacrilegiousness. sent7: if the batik is a schizanthus then the cockpit does stab sacrilegiousness. sent8: the batik is not alienable if the fact that the cockpit does crumb and/or does not stab sacrilegiousness is not right.
sent5 -> int1: the batik is a schizanthus.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the mead is a schizanthus is not incorrect.
sent2 -> int2: if the cockpit is an agriculture then the fact that it does crumb and/or it does not stab sacrilegiousness is not true.; sent1 -> int3: the maser does not inhale multiple if it does condemn rest-cure and does not refer.;
$hypothesis$ = the cockpit does not stab sacrilegiousness. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that condemns rest-cure does not refer it does not inhale multiple. sent2: the fact that something is a crumb or does not stab sacrilegiousness or both is false if it is an agriculture. sent3: the mead is a schizanthus if something either is a schizanthus or is not alienable or both. sent4: the cockpit is skeletal and it is an agriculture if the maser does not inhale multiple. sent5: the batik is a schizanthus and it is alienable. sent6: the lexicalization stabs sacrilegiousness. sent7: if the batik is a schizanthus then the cockpit does stab sacrilegiousness. sent8: the batik is not alienable if the fact that the cockpit does crumb and/or does not stab sacrilegiousness is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the batik is a schizanthus.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__