the shallow-draftness does not occur.
sent1: if the abusing paroxysm happens that the non-lowlandness and the abusing dramatist happens is incorrect. sent2: if the abusing appendicle happens then the abusing ply does not occur and the praetorianness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that that the eosinophilicness but not the floodhead happens hold is not true the eosinophilicness does not occur. sent4: that if that not the lowland but the abusing dramatist occurs is incorrect the harmonization occurs is right. sent5: if the sidling does not occur then the burying Vaishnavism happens. sent6: that the surmounting happens prevents that the abusing paroxysm does not occur. sent7: the fact that the abusing appendicle happens is not incorrect if the harmonization happens. sent8: the criminologicalness does not occur if that both the criminologicalness and the intramuscularness happens is false. sent9: the sidling does not occur if the Homer does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the non-nonenzymaticness and the Homer occurs is incorrect. sent11: the ladder happens and the abdominoplasty happens if the criminologicalness does not occur. sent12: the Homer happens. sent13: if the ladder happens that the eosinophilicness but not the floodhead occurs does not hold. sent14: the antiapartheidness or the plantarness or both happens if the coronary does not occur. sent15: the surmounting occurs if the capture occurs. sent16: if the eosinophilicness happens then the shallow-draftness does not occur. sent17: if the abusing ply does not occur then that the criminologicalness and the intramuscularness occurs is not true. sent18: that the ladling purse does not occur hold if the scald occurs. sent19: that the Homer happens and the nonenzymaticness happens leads to that the coronariness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that the non-nonenzymaticness and the Homer happens is false then the sidling does not occur.
sent20 & sent10 -> int1: the sidling does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the burying Vaishnavism occurs.; int2 -> int3: the eosinophilicness or the burying Vaishnavism or both occurs.;
the shallow-draftness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the shallow-draftness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the abusing paroxysm happens that the non-lowlandness and the abusing dramatist happens is incorrect. sent2: if the abusing appendicle happens then the abusing ply does not occur and the praetorianness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that that the eosinophilicness but not the floodhead happens hold is not true the eosinophilicness does not occur. sent4: that if that not the lowland but the abusing dramatist occurs is incorrect the harmonization occurs is right. sent5: if the sidling does not occur then the burying Vaishnavism happens. sent6: that the surmounting happens prevents that the abusing paroxysm does not occur. sent7: the fact that the abusing appendicle happens is not incorrect if the harmonization happens. sent8: the criminologicalness does not occur if that both the criminologicalness and the intramuscularness happens is false. sent9: the sidling does not occur if the Homer does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the non-nonenzymaticness and the Homer occurs is incorrect. sent11: the ladder happens and the abdominoplasty happens if the criminologicalness does not occur. sent12: the Homer happens. sent13: if the ladder happens that the eosinophilicness but not the floodhead occurs does not hold. sent14: the antiapartheidness or the plantarness or both happens if the coronary does not occur. sent15: the surmounting occurs if the capture occurs. sent16: if the eosinophilicness happens then the shallow-draftness does not occur. sent17: if the abusing ply does not occur then that the criminologicalness and the intramuscularness occurs is not true. sent18: that the ladling purse does not occur hold if the scald occurs. sent19: that the Homer happens and the nonenzymaticness happens leads to that the coronariness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that the non-nonenzymaticness and the Homer happens is false then the sidling does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent10 -> int1: the sidling does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the burying Vaishnavism occurs.; int2 -> int3: the eosinophilicness or the burying Vaishnavism or both occurs.; __UNKNOWN__