that the refuting Mercer does not occur but the impetiginousness occurs if the varnishing MPS happens is not right.
sent1: the compression does not occur or the hemolyticness happens or both if the weeding occurs. sent2: the sympatricness does not occur and/or the anticlimax does not occur. sent3: that the weeding does not occur and/or the hemolyticness does not occur triggers that the varnishing MPS occurs. sent4: the hemolyticness does not occur if the fact that not the refuting Mercer but the bustle occurs is false. sent5: the non-impetiginousness and the augmenting happens if the homocercalness occurs. sent6: that the compression does not occur and/or the hemolyticness happens prevents the compression. sent7: the fact that the refuting Mercer and the bustle happens is false. sent8: the weed or the non-hemolyticness or both occurs. sent9: the FIFO does not occur and the purple happens. sent10: the impetiginousness occurs or the augmenting does not occur or both. sent11: that both the hemolyticness and the varnishing MPS occurs is brought about by that the impetiginousness does not occur. sent12: the varnishing MPS does not occur if the weeding does not occur and/or the hemolyticness does not occur. sent13: the non-stylishness and the equestrianness happens. sent14: the stopping occurs if the unappealableness happens. sent15: not the polymorphousness but the varnishing thorite occurs. sent16: the impetiginousness occurs if either the impetiginousness occurs or the augmenting does not occur or both. sent17: the weeding does not occur and/or the hemolyticness happens. sent18: if the stopping occurs then the fact that the varnishing kwanza does not occur and the Croatian does not occur is false. sent19: the refuting Manawydan does not occur if the fact that that the varnishing kwanza does not occur and the Croatian does not occur is not true is not incorrect. sent20: that either the augmenting happens or the homocercalness does not occur or both if the refuting Manawydan does not occur is not incorrect. sent21: if the fact that not the lapidifying but the aquatics happens does not hold then the flicking killdeer does not occur. sent22: the non-impetiginousness brings about that the weed occurs and the varnishing MPS occurs. sent23: the fact that the albuminuricness does not occur is right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the refuting Mercer does not occur and the bustle happens is not right.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the hemolyticness does not occur is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: the weed does not occur and/or the hemolyticness does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the varnishing MPS does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the varnishing MPS occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: not the refuting Mercer but the bustling happens.; int5 -> int6: the refuting Mercer does not occur.; sent16 & sent10 -> int7: the impetiginousness happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the refuting Mercer does not occur and the impetiginousness occurs.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the compression does not occur or the disjunction does not occur or both.
$hypothesis$ = that the refuting Mercer does not occur but the impetiginousness occurs if the varnishing MPS happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the compression does not occur or the hemolyticness happens or both if the weeding occurs. sent2: the sympatricness does not occur and/or the anticlimax does not occur. sent3: that the weeding does not occur and/or the hemolyticness does not occur triggers that the varnishing MPS occurs. sent4: the hemolyticness does not occur if the fact that not the refuting Mercer but the bustle occurs is false. sent5: the non-impetiginousness and the augmenting happens if the homocercalness occurs. sent6: that the compression does not occur and/or the hemolyticness happens prevents the compression. sent7: the fact that the refuting Mercer and the bustle happens is false. sent8: the weed or the non-hemolyticness or both occurs. sent9: the FIFO does not occur and the purple happens. sent10: the impetiginousness occurs or the augmenting does not occur or both. sent11: that both the hemolyticness and the varnishing MPS occurs is brought about by that the impetiginousness does not occur. sent12: the varnishing MPS does not occur if the weeding does not occur and/or the hemolyticness does not occur. sent13: the non-stylishness and the equestrianness happens. sent14: the stopping occurs if the unappealableness happens. sent15: not the polymorphousness but the varnishing thorite occurs. sent16: the impetiginousness occurs if either the impetiginousness occurs or the augmenting does not occur or both. sent17: the weeding does not occur and/or the hemolyticness happens. sent18: if the stopping occurs then the fact that the varnishing kwanza does not occur and the Croatian does not occur is false. sent19: the refuting Manawydan does not occur if the fact that that the varnishing kwanza does not occur and the Croatian does not occur is not true is not incorrect. sent20: that either the augmenting happens or the homocercalness does not occur or both if the refuting Manawydan does not occur is not incorrect. sent21: if the fact that not the lapidifying but the aquatics happens does not hold then the flicking killdeer does not occur. sent22: the non-impetiginousness brings about that the weed occurs and the varnishing MPS occurs. sent23: the fact that the albuminuricness does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the refuting Mercer does not occur and the bustle happens is not right.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the hemolyticness does not occur is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: the weed does not occur and/or the hemolyticness does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the varnishing MPS does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the varnishing MPS occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: not the refuting Mercer but the bustling happens.; int5 -> int6: the refuting Mercer does not occur.; sent16 & sent10 -> int7: the impetiginousness happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the refuting Mercer does not occur and the impetiginousness occurs.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__