that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Duncan and it does not blind does not hold then it is a rue does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Duncan and it is a blinded does not hold it is a kind of a rue. sent2: something is a rue if that it does not debut Acheson and is not modest is wrong. sent3: the juice furloughs timbered if that it is not a kind of a flatwork and it is not uninucleate is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a Duncan and is non-blinded then it is a kind of a rue. sent5: there exists something such that if that it does not tunnel halothane and it is not Mormons is not correct it does debut tenpin. sent6: the particle is a Duncan if that it does not recover and does not tunnel juice is false. sent7: if the tenpin is not a Duncan and it is not a blinded then it is a rue. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of an opened and it is non-metatarsal is not true then it is uninucleate. sent9: if that the fact that the tenpin is not a Duncan but blinded does not hold is correct then that it is a kind of a rue is correct. sent10: if that the tenpin is a Duncan is correct it is a rue. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Duncan that it is a rue is not wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a seigniory and does not monologuize does not hold it does personify. sent13: if the fact that the tenpin does not debut asynchronism and it is not a Duncan is not right it is curricular. sent14: there is something such that if that it does not tunnel Morley and it is not a kind of a Mormons is not true then it furloughs ascospore. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Duncan but not blinded is incorrect then it is a kind of a rue. sent16: the tenpin is a kind of a rue if the fact that it is not a Duncan and it is not a kind of a blinded is not true. sent17: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it does not devolve and it is not subhuman hold is incorrect then it is avascular. sent18: there is something such that if it blinds it is a rue.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
if that the jerky does not debut Acheson and is not modest is not right then it is a rue.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Duncan and it does not blind does not hold then it is a rue does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Duncan and it is a blinded does not hold it is a kind of a rue. sent2: something is a rue if that it does not debut Acheson and is not modest is wrong. sent3: the juice furloughs timbered if that it is not a kind of a flatwork and it is not uninucleate is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a Duncan and is non-blinded then it is a kind of a rue. sent5: there exists something such that if that it does not tunnel halothane and it is not Mormons is not correct it does debut tenpin. sent6: the particle is a Duncan if that it does not recover and does not tunnel juice is false. sent7: if the tenpin is not a Duncan and it is not a blinded then it is a rue. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of an opened and it is non-metatarsal is not true then it is uninucleate. sent9: if that the fact that the tenpin is not a Duncan but blinded does not hold is correct then that it is a kind of a rue is correct. sent10: if that the tenpin is a Duncan is correct it is a rue. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Duncan that it is a rue is not wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a seigniory and does not monologuize does not hold it does personify. sent13: if the fact that the tenpin does not debut asynchronism and it is not a Duncan is not right it is curricular. sent14: there is something such that if that it does not tunnel Morley and it is not a kind of a Mormons is not true then it furloughs ascospore. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Duncan but not blinded is incorrect then it is a kind of a rue. sent16: the tenpin is a kind of a rue if the fact that it is not a Duncan and it is not a kind of a blinded is not true. sent17: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it does not devolve and it is not subhuman hold is incorrect then it is avascular. sent18: there is something such that if it blinds it is a rue. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__