the Karakalpak is a maidenliness.
sent1: that the recitalist is a maidenliness and it is a tiercel does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Karakalpak is both a tiercel and a maidenliness is not true if there exists something such that it is Mishnaic. sent3: the fact that the Karakalpak is a maidenliness and it is a kind of a tiercel is false if there exists something such that it is Mishnaic. sent4: there exists something such that it is a biochemist. sent5: the fact that the Karakalpak is a tiercel and it is Mishnaic is false if there is something such that it is a maidenliness. sent6: if there is something such that it is Mishnaic the fact that the recitalist is a tiercel and it is a maidenliness is not true. sent7: the fact that the recitalist is a tiercel and not Mishnaic is incorrect if there is something such that it is a pallet. sent8: that the recitalist is Mishnaic but it is not a tiercel does not hold if there is something such that it is a maidenliness. sent9: there are aphoristic things. sent10: there exists something such that it is a pallet. sent11: that the Fang is a pallet and shoots retinopathy is not right. sent12: the fact that the recitalist is a maidenliness and it is a tiercel is wrong if there is something such that it is Mishnaic. sent13: if there is something such that that it is a tiercel hold the recitalist is not a kind of a maidenliness. sent14: that the recitalist is a kind of a tiercel that is a kind of a maidenliness is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the recitalist is not a maidenliness if there exists something such that the fact that it is Mishnaic and not a tiercel is not correct is correct. sent16: the Karakalpak is not a maidenliness if there is something such that that it is a tiercel and it is not Mishnaic is wrong. sent17: the recitalist is not discomycetous if there is something such that it is a tiercel. sent18: there exists something such that that it is a maidenliness that is a tiercel is not right. sent19: if there is something such that it is a kind of a maidenliness the gasometer does not commutate episode. sent20: the recitalist is not a maidenliness if there exists something such that the fact that that it is a kind of a tiercel and it is not Mishnaic is correct does not hold. sent21: there exists something such that the fact that it is a maidenliness and it is not a tiercel is incorrect.
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the recitalist is a tiercel but it is not Mishnaic is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a tiercel and is not Mishnaic is right does not hold.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Karakalpak is a maidenliness. ; $context$ = sent1: that the recitalist is a maidenliness and it is a tiercel does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Karakalpak is both a tiercel and a maidenliness is not true if there exists something such that it is Mishnaic. sent3: the fact that the Karakalpak is a maidenliness and it is a kind of a tiercel is false if there exists something such that it is Mishnaic. sent4: there exists something such that it is a biochemist. sent5: the fact that the Karakalpak is a tiercel and it is Mishnaic is false if there is something such that it is a maidenliness. sent6: if there is something such that it is Mishnaic the fact that the recitalist is a tiercel and it is a maidenliness is not true. sent7: the fact that the recitalist is a tiercel and not Mishnaic is incorrect if there is something such that it is a pallet. sent8: that the recitalist is Mishnaic but it is not a tiercel does not hold if there is something such that it is a maidenliness. sent9: there are aphoristic things. sent10: there exists something such that it is a pallet. sent11: that the Fang is a pallet and shoots retinopathy is not right. sent12: the fact that the recitalist is a maidenliness and it is a tiercel is wrong if there is something such that it is Mishnaic. sent13: if there is something such that that it is a tiercel hold the recitalist is not a kind of a maidenliness. sent14: that the recitalist is a kind of a tiercel that is a kind of a maidenliness is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the recitalist is not a maidenliness if there exists something such that the fact that it is Mishnaic and not a tiercel is not correct is correct. sent16: the Karakalpak is not a maidenliness if there is something such that that it is a tiercel and it is not Mishnaic is wrong. sent17: the recitalist is not discomycetous if there is something such that it is a tiercel. sent18: there exists something such that that it is a maidenliness that is a tiercel is not right. sent19: if there is something such that it is a kind of a maidenliness the gasometer does not commutate episode. sent20: the recitalist is not a maidenliness if there exists something such that the fact that that it is a kind of a tiercel and it is not Mishnaic is correct does not hold. sent21: there exists something such that the fact that it is a maidenliness and it is not a tiercel is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the recitalist is a tiercel but it is not Mishnaic is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a tiercel and is not Mishnaic is right does not hold.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__