that the excuse does not cane menagerie but it is a slugger is not correct.
sent1: something is not a convert. sent2: if that the BLT canes menagerie but it is not a round is false then the fact that the unicyclist is not a slugger is not false. sent3: the driveway does not cane BLT. sent4: the instillator is a kind of conventional a receipt if the fact that the driveway does not cane BLT is not false. sent5: if something is not a slugger then it is a kind of a dominant that is smoky. sent6: the excuse is not etiological or it does not elute Mordva or both if there is something such that it is not etiological. sent7: either the excuse is etiological or it does not elute Mordva or both. sent8: something is both not a round and not a dominant if it does not cane Cynocephalus. sent9: the excuse does loom Hieracium. sent10: something is etiological. sent11: the excuse is etiological or it does not elute Mordva or both if there exists something such that it is not etiological. sent12: the excuse is round and it is dominant. sent13: there is something such that it is not etiological. sent14: that something does not cane menagerie but it is a slugger is wrong if it does not round. sent15: the excuse is not a kind of a round if the BLT is not a round and is not a dominant. sent16: something is an incursion if it is costal. sent17: if the fact that the dry does not cane Cynocephalus or is an incursion or both is not false the BLT does not cane Cynocephalus. sent18: the excuse is a dominant. sent19: that the dasyurid is not a title and does not elute philanthropist is not true if that the instillator is a kind of a receipt is not false. sent20: something is a kind of a slugger if that it is a kind of a round is not incorrect. sent21: the excuse either is not etiological or elutes Mordva or both. sent22: if something either is not etiological or does not elute Mordva or both then it does not cane menagerie. sent23: the excuse is not etiological and/or elutes Mordva if something is not etiological.
sent22 -> int1: the excuse does not cane menagerie if it is not etiological and/or does not elute Mordva.; sent13 & sent6 -> int2: the excuse is not etiological and/or it does not elute Mordva.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the excuse does not cane menagerie.; sent20 -> int4: if the excuse is round then it is a kind of a slugger.; sent12 -> int5: the excuse is round.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the excuse is a slugger.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the excuse does not cane menagerie and is a slugger is not right.
sent14 -> int7: if the excuse is not round then that it does not cane menagerie and it is a slugger is wrong.; sent8 -> int8: the BLT is not round and not dominant if the fact that it does not cane Cynocephalus is not wrong.; sent16 -> int9: if the dry is costal then it is a kind of an incursion.; sent4 & sent3 -> int10: the instillator is conventional and it does receipt.; int10 -> int11: the instillator is a kind of a receipt.; sent19 & int11 -> int12: that the dasyurid is not a title and does not elute philanthropist is not right.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is not a title and does not elute philanthropist is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the excuse does not cane menagerie but it is a slugger is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a convert. sent2: if that the BLT canes menagerie but it is not a round is false then the fact that the unicyclist is not a slugger is not false. sent3: the driveway does not cane BLT. sent4: the instillator is a kind of conventional a receipt if the fact that the driveway does not cane BLT is not false. sent5: if something is not a slugger then it is a kind of a dominant that is smoky. sent6: the excuse is not etiological or it does not elute Mordva or both if there is something such that it is not etiological. sent7: either the excuse is etiological or it does not elute Mordva or both. sent8: something is both not a round and not a dominant if it does not cane Cynocephalus. sent9: the excuse does loom Hieracium. sent10: something is etiological. sent11: the excuse is etiological or it does not elute Mordva or both if there exists something such that it is not etiological. sent12: the excuse is round and it is dominant. sent13: there is something such that it is not etiological. sent14: that something does not cane menagerie but it is a slugger is wrong if it does not round. sent15: the excuse is not a kind of a round if the BLT is not a round and is not a dominant. sent16: something is an incursion if it is costal. sent17: if the fact that the dry does not cane Cynocephalus or is an incursion or both is not false the BLT does not cane Cynocephalus. sent18: the excuse is a dominant. sent19: that the dasyurid is not a title and does not elute philanthropist is not true if that the instillator is a kind of a receipt is not false. sent20: something is a kind of a slugger if that it is a kind of a round is not incorrect. sent21: the excuse either is not etiological or elutes Mordva or both. sent22: if something either is not etiological or does not elute Mordva or both then it does not cane menagerie. sent23: the excuse is not etiological and/or elutes Mordva if something is not etiological. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: the excuse does not cane menagerie if it is not etiological and/or does not elute Mordva.; sent13 & sent6 -> int2: the excuse is not etiological and/or it does not elute Mordva.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the excuse does not cane menagerie.; sent20 -> int4: if the excuse is round then it is a kind of a slugger.; sent12 -> int5: the excuse is round.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the excuse is a slugger.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__