the HDTV does stigmatize brevet and is not anoperineal if the Frank is not biotic.
sent1: the HDTV stigmatizes brevet but it is not anoperineal if the Hanoverian does not stigmatizes brevet. sent2: the Hanoverian is not a kind of a sertraline. sent3: the Frank is biotic if it is not a condyle and does boot echoencephalography. sent4: the Frank does boot echoencephalography. sent5: the Hanoverian does boot echoencephalography. sent6: if something is not a kind of a Peron then it is both non-biotic and not non-anoperineal. sent7: the fact that the HDTV is both biotic and not anoperineal if the Frank is not a kind of a condyle is correct. sent8: the Frank is not biotic but it stigmatizes brevet. sent9: if the Frank does not stigmatize brevet the Hanoverian stigmatize brevet and is not a condyle. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a condyle and it does boot echoencephalography is incorrect. sent11: the HDTV is not anoperineal if the fact that the Hanoverian does not stigmatize brevet hold. sent12: the fact that if the HDTV does not boot echoencephalography then the Frank does boot echoencephalography but it is not anoperineal is right. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a condyle and does stigmatize brevet is wrong. sent14: the HDTV is not anoperineal. sent15: if there is something such that it does not boot echoencephalography then the Hanoverian does not stigmatize brevet. sent16: the Hanoverian is odorous but it does not bumble adulterant. sent17: the HDTV is not anoperineal if the Frank is not biotic. sent18: there is something such that it is not a condyle and it does boot echoencephalography. sent19: if the Frank is not biotic but it is anoperineal then the adulterant is same. sent20: that the HDTV stigmatizes brevet but it is not anoperineal if the Frank is biotic is not false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Frank is not a kind of a condyle but it does boot echoencephalography.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the Frank is biotic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Frank is not biotic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the Frank is not a kind of a condyle but it boots echoencephalography is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is not a condyle and boots echoencephalography does not hold.;
the adulterant is same but it is not a condyle.
sent6 -> int5: if the Frank is not a kind of a Peron then it is not biotic and is anoperineal.;
$hypothesis$ = the HDTV does stigmatize brevet and is not anoperineal if the Frank is not biotic. ; $context$ = sent1: the HDTV stigmatizes brevet but it is not anoperineal if the Hanoverian does not stigmatizes brevet. sent2: the Hanoverian is not a kind of a sertraline. sent3: the Frank is biotic if it is not a condyle and does boot echoencephalography. sent4: the Frank does boot echoencephalography. sent5: the Hanoverian does boot echoencephalography. sent6: if something is not a kind of a Peron then it is both non-biotic and not non-anoperineal. sent7: the fact that the HDTV is both biotic and not anoperineal if the Frank is not a kind of a condyle is correct. sent8: the Frank is not biotic but it stigmatizes brevet. sent9: if the Frank does not stigmatize brevet the Hanoverian stigmatize brevet and is not a condyle. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a condyle and it does boot echoencephalography is incorrect. sent11: the HDTV is not anoperineal if the fact that the Hanoverian does not stigmatize brevet hold. sent12: the fact that if the HDTV does not boot echoencephalography then the Frank does boot echoencephalography but it is not anoperineal is right. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a condyle and does stigmatize brevet is wrong. sent14: the HDTV is not anoperineal. sent15: if there is something such that it does not boot echoencephalography then the Hanoverian does not stigmatize brevet. sent16: the Hanoverian is odorous but it does not bumble adulterant. sent17: the HDTV is not anoperineal if the Frank is not biotic. sent18: there is something such that it is not a condyle and it does boot echoencephalography. sent19: if the Frank is not biotic but it is anoperineal then the adulterant is same. sent20: that the HDTV stigmatizes brevet but it is not anoperineal if the Frank is biotic is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Frank is not a kind of a condyle but it does boot echoencephalography.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the Frank is biotic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Frank is not biotic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the Frank is not a kind of a condyle but it boots echoencephalography is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is not a condyle and boots echoencephalography does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__