the tolu is a dacoit.
sent1: the fact that the fact that everything is not a headscarf is not incorrect hold. sent2: if something does not guzzle the fact that it is not a kind of a Kurdistan and it is not a agaric does not hold. sent3: the psycholinguist is a kind of an ageratum and does camber psycholinguist. sent4: something is a kind of a dacoit if that it gears cruet is not incorrect. sent5: the Lhasa does not guzzle if the myrmecophyte does guzzle and it does gear tolu. sent6: if the tolu is both inaccessible and a headscarf it is not a dacoit. sent7: the mouthpart is acidotic if the psycholinguist is an ageratum. sent8: if something is inaccessible and it is a headscarf it is not a dacoit. sent9: if that that the Lhasa is not a agaric and it is not a kind of a dacoit does not hold is not wrong the tolu is a dacoit. sent10: if something that is inaccessible is not a headscarf that it is not a dacoit is not false. sent11: the tolu is not a kind of a headscarf. sent12: the tolu is jittery and does not board. sent13: the tolu is not a pabulum. sent14: everything is not accessible and is not a headscarf. sent15: everything is technophilic thing that does not gear tolu. sent16: the ham is not a dacoit. sent17: the tolu does not rotate re-formation if it is a cobber and it is not lexicostatistics.
sent14 -> int1: the tolu is inaccessible but it is not a headscarf.; sent10 -> int2: the tolu is not a dacoit if it is not accessible and it is not a kind of a headscarf.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the tolu is a kind of a dacoit.
sent4 -> int3: the tolu is a dacoit if it does gear cruet.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the Lhasa is not a Kurdistan and not a agaric is not correct if it does not guzzle.; sent3 -> int5: the psycholinguist is an ageratum.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the mouthpart is acidotic.; int6 -> int7: something is acidotic.;
$hypothesis$ = the tolu is a dacoit. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that everything is not a headscarf is not incorrect hold. sent2: if something does not guzzle the fact that it is not a kind of a Kurdistan and it is not a agaric does not hold. sent3: the psycholinguist is a kind of an ageratum and does camber psycholinguist. sent4: something is a kind of a dacoit if that it gears cruet is not incorrect. sent5: the Lhasa does not guzzle if the myrmecophyte does guzzle and it does gear tolu. sent6: if the tolu is both inaccessible and a headscarf it is not a dacoit. sent7: the mouthpart is acidotic if the psycholinguist is an ageratum. sent8: if something is inaccessible and it is a headscarf it is not a dacoit. sent9: if that that the Lhasa is not a agaric and it is not a kind of a dacoit does not hold is not wrong the tolu is a dacoit. sent10: if something that is inaccessible is not a headscarf that it is not a dacoit is not false. sent11: the tolu is not a kind of a headscarf. sent12: the tolu is jittery and does not board. sent13: the tolu is not a pabulum. sent14: everything is not accessible and is not a headscarf. sent15: everything is technophilic thing that does not gear tolu. sent16: the ham is not a dacoit. sent17: the tolu does not rotate re-formation if it is a cobber and it is not lexicostatistics. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the tolu is inaccessible but it is not a headscarf.; sent10 -> int2: the tolu is not a dacoit if it is not accessible and it is not a kind of a headscarf.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__