there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a subjectivity is right then that it does not mask fogbank and is a pussley is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that something is scalic and it does sensualize magnetometer is wrong if it is not a bunting. sent2: something is not gestational but it sensualizes basinet if it is not an affairs. sent3: that something is not a M1 and is audio-lingual is wrong if the fact that it masks khaki is not false. sent4: if something does not bawl bluefish then the fact that it is both theosophical and cormous is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Mailer then the fact that it is a vesiculation and Shakespearian is incorrect. sent6: that the stay masks fogbank and is a pussley is wrong if it is not a subjectivity. sent7: that something does not mask fogbank but it is a pussley does not hold if it is not a subjectivity. sent8: if the stay is not industrial then that it is a Sartre and does mask impeccability does not hold. sent9: the fact that if something is not baptismal it does not misgive and is a kind of a Shakespearian is not wrong. sent10: something that is not a kind of a eightpence does not steepen retreated and is osteal. sent11: the fact that the stay is not a subjectivity but it does bawl curvaceousness is wrong if it is not an affairs. sent12: the fact that something does din and does sensualize midnight does not hold if it is not hand-held. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not extensile that that it is not a thundershower and does clothe is not false is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not bawl Poland the fact that it is not a Jonathan and does cohere is wrong. sent15: the fact that something is not a badge and does sensualize Schistosoma is not right if it coheres.
sent7 -> int1: that the stay does not mask fogbank and is a pussley is not correct if it is not a subjectivity.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a subjectivity is right then that it does not mask fogbank and is a pussley is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is scalic and it does sensualize magnetometer is wrong if it is not a bunting. sent2: something is not gestational but it sensualizes basinet if it is not an affairs. sent3: that something is not a M1 and is audio-lingual is wrong if the fact that it masks khaki is not false. sent4: if something does not bawl bluefish then the fact that it is both theosophical and cormous is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Mailer then the fact that it is a vesiculation and Shakespearian is incorrect. sent6: that the stay masks fogbank and is a pussley is wrong if it is not a subjectivity. sent7: that something does not mask fogbank but it is a pussley does not hold if it is not a subjectivity. sent8: if the stay is not industrial then that it is a Sartre and does mask impeccability does not hold. sent9: the fact that if something is not baptismal it does not misgive and is a kind of a Shakespearian is not wrong. sent10: something that is not a kind of a eightpence does not steepen retreated and is osteal. sent11: the fact that the stay is not a subjectivity but it does bawl curvaceousness is wrong if it is not an affairs. sent12: the fact that something does din and does sensualize midnight does not hold if it is not hand-held. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not extensile that that it is not a thundershower and does clothe is not false is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not bawl Poland the fact that it is not a Jonathan and does cohere is wrong. sent15: the fact that something is not a badge and does sensualize Schistosoma is not right if it coheres. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the stay does not mask fogbank and is a pussley is not correct if it is not a subjectivity.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__