the pygmy is nonconductive.
sent1: that the appointee is not unjust but it is physiotherapeutic does not hold if there are nonconductive things. sent2: that the poolroom is both Ceylonese and a blacking is false if the pygmy is not a lug. sent3: if the compressor is not unjust the fact that the poolroom is nonconductive thing that is a consultancy is false. sent4: the Turkoman is not a consultancy if there exists something such that that it is a consultancy and it is not denominational does not hold. sent5: if that the poolroom is unjust is not incorrect the compressor is a consultancy. sent6: something is a kind of a blacking if it is Ceylonese. sent7: the compressor is not physiotherapeutic. sent8: that the pygmy is not nonconductive but it is a yachtsman is not true. sent9: if the compressor is not Ceylonese the fact that it is a kind of a consultancy hold. sent10: the fact that something is a consultancy and is not denominational is not true if it lugs. sent11: the pygmy is not Ceylonese. sent12: the poolroom is Ceylonese if the fact that the compressor is bidirectional is not false. sent13: the compressor is not a consultancy if it is not a lug. sent14: the poolroom is not a chiffon and is not a syphilitic. sent15: the poolroom is not a nectarine. sent16: the stockholder is bidirectional. sent17: the poolroom is unjust if that it is not bidirectional is true. sent18: the pygmy is physiotherapeutic if it is a highway. sent19: if the poolroom is a kind of a lug then the pygmy is denominational. sent20: the pygmy is a lug if that it is both not physiotherapeutic and not Ceylonese is wrong. sent21: something is nonconductive. sent22: if the compressor is a kind of a consultancy the fact that it is not non-physiotherapeutic is true. sent23: the patentee is a consultancy. sent24: the poolroom is not bidirectional if that it is both Ceylonese and blacking is false. sent25: if something is denominational then it is a kind of a consultancy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pygmy is not a kind of a lug and it is not denominational.; assump1 -> int1: the pygmy is not a kind of a lug.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the poolroom is Ceylonese thing that is a kind of a blacking does not hold.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the poolroom is not bidirectional.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the poolroom is unjust.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the compressor is a consultancy.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: the fact that the compressor is physiotherapeutic is correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the pygmy is not a lug and is not denominational is incorrect.;
the Turkoman is not a consultancy.
sent10 -> int9: that the fact that the pygmy is both a consultancy and not denominational is not right hold if it is a lug.; sent6 -> int10: if the poolroom is Ceylonese then it is a blacking.; sent21 & sent1 -> int11: the fact that the appointee is both not unjust and not non-physiotherapeutic is not right.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is non-unjust thing that is physiotherapeutic is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the pygmy is nonconductive. ; $context$ = sent1: that the appointee is not unjust but it is physiotherapeutic does not hold if there are nonconductive things. sent2: that the poolroom is both Ceylonese and a blacking is false if the pygmy is not a lug. sent3: if the compressor is not unjust the fact that the poolroom is nonconductive thing that is a consultancy is false. sent4: the Turkoman is not a consultancy if there exists something such that that it is a consultancy and it is not denominational does not hold. sent5: if that the poolroom is unjust is not incorrect the compressor is a consultancy. sent6: something is a kind of a blacking if it is Ceylonese. sent7: the compressor is not physiotherapeutic. sent8: that the pygmy is not nonconductive but it is a yachtsman is not true. sent9: if the compressor is not Ceylonese the fact that it is a kind of a consultancy hold. sent10: the fact that something is a consultancy and is not denominational is not true if it lugs. sent11: the pygmy is not Ceylonese. sent12: the poolroom is Ceylonese if the fact that the compressor is bidirectional is not false. sent13: the compressor is not a consultancy if it is not a lug. sent14: the poolroom is not a chiffon and is not a syphilitic. sent15: the poolroom is not a nectarine. sent16: the stockholder is bidirectional. sent17: the poolroom is unjust if that it is not bidirectional is true. sent18: the pygmy is physiotherapeutic if it is a highway. sent19: if the poolroom is a kind of a lug then the pygmy is denominational. sent20: the pygmy is a lug if that it is both not physiotherapeutic and not Ceylonese is wrong. sent21: something is nonconductive. sent22: if the compressor is a kind of a consultancy the fact that it is not non-physiotherapeutic is true. sent23: the patentee is a consultancy. sent24: the poolroom is not bidirectional if that it is both Ceylonese and blacking is false. sent25: if something is denominational then it is a kind of a consultancy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pygmy is not a kind of a lug and it is not denominational.; assump1 -> int1: the pygmy is not a kind of a lug.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the poolroom is Ceylonese thing that is a kind of a blacking does not hold.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the poolroom is not bidirectional.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the poolroom is unjust.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the compressor is a consultancy.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: the fact that the compressor is physiotherapeutic is correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the pygmy is not a lug and is not denominational is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__