the mound is intertidal.
sent1: if the fact that the bartender is not Arabic hold it does not uphold continuation and it does not finalize Roentgen. sent2: if the bartender upholds continuation but it does not finalize Roentgen then the mound is not intertidal. sent3: the bartender is a Fellini if the quince is not a Fellini. sent4: the wittol is a kind of a prostate but it is not a Goldsboro. sent5: the bartender is spineless if it is a kind of a Fellini. sent6: if something is myocardial it is not a kind of a Fellini. sent7: if something is not a kind of a sawpit then it is both a Arabic and intertidal. sent8: the bartender is not a Arabic. sent9: the bartender does not uphold continuation if it is not Arabic. sent10: something that is not a lobby does not criticize seniority and does finalize drip. sent11: something is not a sawpit if it does not criticize seniority and does finalize drip. sent12: if the quince is a mesenchyme then that it is myocardial is correct. sent13: the quince is prostate if the wittol is a prostate but it is not a Goldsboro. sent14: if the quince is a prostate then it is a kind of a mesenchyme. sent15: the mound is not intertidal if the bartender does not uphold continuation and it does not finalize Roentgen.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the bartender does not uphold continuation and does not finalize Roentgen.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis;
that the mound is intertidal is right.
sent7 -> int2: the mound is a Arabic that is intertidal if it is not a sawpit.; sent11 -> int3: if that the mound does not criticize seniority but it does finalize drip is true then it is not a sawpit.; sent10 -> int4: if the mound is not a lobby it does not criticize seniority and it finalizes drip.; sent6 -> int5: that the quince is not a Fellini hold if it is myocardial.; sent13 & sent4 -> int6: the quince is a prostate.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the quince is a mesenchyme.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the quince is myocardial.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the quince is not a kind of a Fellini.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the bartender is a Fellini is not wrong.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the bartender is spineless is right.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is spineless.;
$hypothesis$ = the mound is intertidal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the bartender is not Arabic hold it does not uphold continuation and it does not finalize Roentgen. sent2: if the bartender upholds continuation but it does not finalize Roentgen then the mound is not intertidal. sent3: the bartender is a Fellini if the quince is not a Fellini. sent4: the wittol is a kind of a prostate but it is not a Goldsboro. sent5: the bartender is spineless if it is a kind of a Fellini. sent6: if something is myocardial it is not a kind of a Fellini. sent7: if something is not a kind of a sawpit then it is both a Arabic and intertidal. sent8: the bartender is not a Arabic. sent9: the bartender does not uphold continuation if it is not Arabic. sent10: something that is not a lobby does not criticize seniority and does finalize drip. sent11: something is not a sawpit if it does not criticize seniority and does finalize drip. sent12: if the quince is a mesenchyme then that it is myocardial is correct. sent13: the quince is prostate if the wittol is a prostate but it is not a Goldsboro. sent14: if the quince is a prostate then it is a kind of a mesenchyme. sent15: the mound is not intertidal if the bartender does not uphold continuation and it does not finalize Roentgen. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the bartender does not uphold continuation and does not finalize Roentgen.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__