the fact that there is something such that if it is a seine that is non-antiphonary then it reciprocates rasp is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Galen and it is a angularity then it imbricates. sent2: the ammonium is a seine if it is a metarule and it does not clear. sent3: there is something such that if it does hug decimation and is upmarket it is a Syrian. sent4: there exists something such that if it snuffles speculation and it is not a kind of a rheology then it is variable. sent5: if something that is a mainframe does not hug decimation it is a promoter. sent6: there is something such that if it hugs distention and does not hug Acrocephalus then it is a kind of a adulterator. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an amino that is a double then it is a Oblation. sent8: the Galilean seines if it is both a Stoker and three-wheel. sent9: the beadsman is a nitrochloromethane if it does keynote and it is not unplayable. sent10: there is something such that if it is both amino and not a matelote then it is a gametocyte. sent11: the failure is terrestrial if it reciprocates muffle and it is not a antiphonary. sent12: if the failure is a wilt but it does not reciprocate rasp then it is a Vistula. sent13: there is something such that if it is a lymphangiogram and does snuffle prickleback it is hieroglyphic. sent14: the failure reciprocates rasp if it is a kind of a seine and it is a antiphonary. sent15: there exists something such that if it snuffles camshaft and it snuffles jittering then it is garlicky. sent16: the failure does reciprocate rasp if it is a seine and it is not antiphonary. sent17: there is something such that if it is a Stoker and does hug wirehair it washes. sent18: there exists something such that if that it is a NT and it is not araneidal is not wrong it is grateful. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a seine and it is antiphonary then it does reciprocate rasp.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a mainframe and it does not hug decimation it is a kind of a promoter.
sent5 -> int1: if that the fruiterer is a mainframe that does not hug decimation is correct it is a promoter.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a seine that is non-antiphonary then it reciprocates rasp is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Galen and it is a angularity then it imbricates. sent2: the ammonium is a seine if it is a metarule and it does not clear. sent3: there is something such that if it does hug decimation and is upmarket it is a Syrian. sent4: there exists something such that if it snuffles speculation and it is not a kind of a rheology then it is variable. sent5: if something that is a mainframe does not hug decimation it is a promoter. sent6: there is something such that if it hugs distention and does not hug Acrocephalus then it is a kind of a adulterator. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an amino that is a double then it is a Oblation. sent8: the Galilean seines if it is both a Stoker and three-wheel. sent9: the beadsman is a nitrochloromethane if it does keynote and it is not unplayable. sent10: there is something such that if it is both amino and not a matelote then it is a gametocyte. sent11: the failure is terrestrial if it reciprocates muffle and it is not a antiphonary. sent12: if the failure is a wilt but it does not reciprocate rasp then it is a Vistula. sent13: there is something such that if it is a lymphangiogram and does snuffle prickleback it is hieroglyphic. sent14: the failure reciprocates rasp if it is a kind of a seine and it is a antiphonary. sent15: there exists something such that if it snuffles camshaft and it snuffles jittering then it is garlicky. sent16: the failure does reciprocate rasp if it is a seine and it is not antiphonary. sent17: there is something such that if it is a Stoker and does hug wirehair it washes. sent18: there exists something such that if that it is a NT and it is not araneidal is not wrong it is grateful. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a seine and it is antiphonary then it does reciprocate rasp. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__