the fact that the vichyssoise is both not cosmologic and not a meloid is false.
sent1: the adumbration is not a kind of a dilutant. sent2: the fact that if that something geysers pomade is correct it is uncomplimentary is correct. sent3: something is a meloid. sent4: if the dottle does not geyser pomade the fact that the adumbration is a kind of sociocultural thing that does not geyser pomade is wrong. sent5: the adumbration does geyser pomade and is a faun. sent6: if the aminomethane is not a kind of a meloid that that the vichyssoise is not cosmologic and not a meloid is true is wrong. sent7: if the stoat is a dilutant the aminomethane is not a meloid. sent8: the aminomethane does not talc surf. sent9: something is non-cosmologic thing that geysers pomade if it is not a dilutant. sent10: the vichyssoise is not cosmologic if the adumbration is not cosmologic but it geysers pomade. sent11: the adumbration is not cosmologic. sent12: the dottle does geyser pomade and it is a W. sent13: the stoat is not cosmologic. sent14: that the goshawk is not a kind of a miller and it is not cosmologic is not true. sent15: there exists something such that it is both visible and eruptive. sent16: the stoat is a dilutant if the goshawk is not a kind of a miller but it does talc surf. sent17: that that the vichyssoise is cosmologic but it is not a meloid is not incorrect is not correct if the aminomethane is not a kind of a meloid. sent18: everything is a kind of a pride. sent19: the vichyssoise is not a meloid if the dottle is a faun. sent20: there is something such that it geysers pomade and it is a meloid. sent21: the goshawk is not a kind of a miller but it talcs surf if the dottle is not sociocultural. sent22: the adumbration does geyser pomade and it is a pioneer. sent23: the goshawk talcs surf. sent24: that the dottle is not sociocultural is right if there is something such that it is a faun and it is a kind of a pride.
sent5 -> int1: the adumbration is a faun.; sent18 -> int2: the adumbration does pride.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adumbration is a faun and is a pride.; int3 -> int4: something is both a faun and a pride.; int4 & sent24 -> int5: the dottle is not sociocultural.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the goshawk is not a miller but it talcs surf.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the stoat is a dilutant.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the aminomethane is not a meloid.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the vichyssoise is both not cosmologic and not a meloid.
sent9 -> int9: the adumbration is not cosmologic and does geyser pomade if it is not a kind of a dilutant.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the adumbration is non-cosmologic thing that geysers pomade.; sent10 & int10 -> int11: the vichyssoise is not cosmologic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the vichyssoise is both not cosmologic and not a meloid is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the adumbration is not a kind of a dilutant. sent2: the fact that if that something geysers pomade is correct it is uncomplimentary is correct. sent3: something is a meloid. sent4: if the dottle does not geyser pomade the fact that the adumbration is a kind of sociocultural thing that does not geyser pomade is wrong. sent5: the adumbration does geyser pomade and is a faun. sent6: if the aminomethane is not a kind of a meloid that that the vichyssoise is not cosmologic and not a meloid is true is wrong. sent7: if the stoat is a dilutant the aminomethane is not a meloid. sent8: the aminomethane does not talc surf. sent9: something is non-cosmologic thing that geysers pomade if it is not a dilutant. sent10: the vichyssoise is not cosmologic if the adumbration is not cosmologic but it geysers pomade. sent11: the adumbration is not cosmologic. sent12: the dottle does geyser pomade and it is a W. sent13: the stoat is not cosmologic. sent14: that the goshawk is not a kind of a miller and it is not cosmologic is not true. sent15: there exists something such that it is both visible and eruptive. sent16: the stoat is a dilutant if the goshawk is not a kind of a miller but it does talc surf. sent17: that that the vichyssoise is cosmologic but it is not a meloid is not incorrect is not correct if the aminomethane is not a kind of a meloid. sent18: everything is a kind of a pride. sent19: the vichyssoise is not a meloid if the dottle is a faun. sent20: there is something such that it geysers pomade and it is a meloid. sent21: the goshawk is not a kind of a miller but it talcs surf if the dottle is not sociocultural. sent22: the adumbration does geyser pomade and it is a pioneer. sent23: the goshawk talcs surf. sent24: that the dottle is not sociocultural is right if there is something such that it is a faun and it is a kind of a pride. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the adumbration is a faun.; sent18 -> int2: the adumbration does pride.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adumbration is a faun and is a pride.; int3 -> int4: something is both a faun and a pride.; int4 & sent24 -> int5: the dottle is not sociocultural.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the goshawk is not a miller but it talcs surf.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the stoat is a dilutant.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the aminomethane is not a meloid.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__