the roar does not occur.
sent1: the nastiness does not occur if the fact that the ribbing occurs or the Aramaic happens or both is incorrect. sent2: the fact that not the fell but the high-resolutionness happens is incorrect if the whitecap does not occur. sent3: the contemplating tug-of-war does not occur. sent4: that both the fishiness and the falling occurs is triggered by that the Curietherapy does not occur. sent5: the contemplating colorimeter does not occur. sent6: that the resettling and the high-resolutionness occurs leads to that the fell does not occur. sent7: the fact that the Curietherapy does not occur is right if the diffidentness and the contemplating colorimeter happens. sent8: the roaring does not occur if the fact that either the pushing instructions occurs or the whitecap occurs or both is incorrect. sent9: the pushing instructions happens if the high-resolutionness does not occur. sent10: the fishiness occurs. sent11: that the pushing instructions does not occur and/or the whitecap happens is not correct if the high-resolutionness does not occur. sent12: the pushing instructions occurs. sent13: the resettling occurs and the swindle happens. sent14: the fact that the Curietherapy does not occur is not wrong if the diffidentness occurs but the contemplating colorimeter does not occur. sent15: the roar does not occur if the fact that the pushing instructions does not occur and/or the whitecap happens is not right. sent16: if the fact that the dialing does not occur and/or the positionalness occurs does not hold the becoming does not occur. sent17: that the swindle does not occur leads to that both the roaring and the resettling occurs. sent18: the diffidentness but not the contemplating colorimeter happens. sent19: if that the diffidentness does not occur and the fishiness does not occur does not hold the fishiness happens.
sent13 -> int1: the resettling occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the high-resolutionness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the resettling happens and the high-resolutionness occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the falling does not occur.; sent14 & sent18 -> int4: the Curietherapy does not occur.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the fishiness and the fell occurs.; int5 -> int6: the falling happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the high-resolutionness does not occur.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: that the pushing instructions does not occur or the whitecap happens or both is not correct.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the roar happens.
$hypothesis$ = the roar does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the nastiness does not occur if the fact that the ribbing occurs or the Aramaic happens or both is incorrect. sent2: the fact that not the fell but the high-resolutionness happens is incorrect if the whitecap does not occur. sent3: the contemplating tug-of-war does not occur. sent4: that both the fishiness and the falling occurs is triggered by that the Curietherapy does not occur. sent5: the contemplating colorimeter does not occur. sent6: that the resettling and the high-resolutionness occurs leads to that the fell does not occur. sent7: the fact that the Curietherapy does not occur is right if the diffidentness and the contemplating colorimeter happens. sent8: the roaring does not occur if the fact that either the pushing instructions occurs or the whitecap occurs or both is incorrect. sent9: the pushing instructions happens if the high-resolutionness does not occur. sent10: the fishiness occurs. sent11: that the pushing instructions does not occur and/or the whitecap happens is not correct if the high-resolutionness does not occur. sent12: the pushing instructions occurs. sent13: the resettling occurs and the swindle happens. sent14: the fact that the Curietherapy does not occur is not wrong if the diffidentness occurs but the contemplating colorimeter does not occur. sent15: the roar does not occur if the fact that the pushing instructions does not occur and/or the whitecap happens is not right. sent16: if the fact that the dialing does not occur and/or the positionalness occurs does not hold the becoming does not occur. sent17: that the swindle does not occur leads to that both the roaring and the resettling occurs. sent18: the diffidentness but not the contemplating colorimeter happens. sent19: if that the diffidentness does not occur and the fishiness does not occur does not hold the fishiness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the resettling occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the high-resolutionness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the resettling happens and the high-resolutionness occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the falling does not occur.; sent14 & sent18 -> int4: the Curietherapy does not occur.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the fishiness and the fell occurs.; int5 -> int6: the falling happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the high-resolutionness does not occur.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: that the pushing instructions does not occur or the whitecap happens or both is not correct.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__