the accruing and the Vedicness happens.
sent1: that the acrophony does not occur and/or that the salientness does not occur prevents that the acrophony happens. sent2: the tinker happens and/or the cacodylicness does not occur. sent3: both the Vedicness and the hyoid happens. sent4: if the sideness does not occur the fact that both the non-hydrostaticsness and the salient happens is not right. sent5: the acrophony occurs. sent6: the accruing happens if the blend but not the sculpture occurs. sent7: if that the non-hydrostaticsness and the salient occurs is not correct that the sculpture does not occur hold. sent8: that the blending happens but the presentment does not occur causes that the teratogenicness occurs. sent9: that the acrophony happens prevents that the presentment does not occur. sent10: that the presentment does not occur if the blending does not occur hold. sent11: the tinkering or that the cacodylicness does not occur or both prevents that the sideness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blend does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the presentment does not occur.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the presentment happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the blend happens.; sent11 & sent2 -> int5: the side does not occur.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that not the hydrostaticsness but the salientness happens does not hold.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: that the sculpture does not occur is not wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the blending but not the sculpture occurs.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the accruing occurs.; sent3 -> int10: the Vedicness occurs.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the teratogenicness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the accruing and the Vedicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the acrophony does not occur and/or that the salientness does not occur prevents that the acrophony happens. sent2: the tinker happens and/or the cacodylicness does not occur. sent3: both the Vedicness and the hyoid happens. sent4: if the sideness does not occur the fact that both the non-hydrostaticsness and the salient happens is not right. sent5: the acrophony occurs. sent6: the accruing happens if the blend but not the sculpture occurs. sent7: if that the non-hydrostaticsness and the salient occurs is not correct that the sculpture does not occur hold. sent8: that the blending happens but the presentment does not occur causes that the teratogenicness occurs. sent9: that the acrophony happens prevents that the presentment does not occur. sent10: that the presentment does not occur if the blending does not occur hold. sent11: the tinkering or that the cacodylicness does not occur or both prevents that the sideness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blend does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the presentment does not occur.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the presentment happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the blend happens.; sent11 & sent2 -> int5: the side does not occur.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that not the hydrostaticsness but the salientness happens does not hold.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: that the sculpture does not occur is not wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the blending but not the sculpture occurs.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the accruing occurs.; sent3 -> int10: the Vedicness occurs.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__