the waders is a Reid.
sent1: that the waders does not rabbet cymene and it is not weak is not true. sent2: the lambkin is epigastric and does not symphonize. sent3: if that something is both not a depolarization and not a decayed is not right it is a Reid. sent4: the fact that the formalwear is not a depolarization but it is glomerular is not correct. sent5: if the formalwear is not non-glomerular but it is not actable the lambkin is not a galea. sent6: everything is both a galea and an upset. sent7: everything does upset. sent8: if the yashmak is testate the formalwear is glomerular but it is not actable. sent9: the formalwear is not non-glomerular. sent10: the fact that the fact that the waders is not a kind of a depolarization and it is not a kind of a decayed is false is correct if there is something such that it is not testate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the yashmak is testate.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the formalwear is both glomerular and not actable.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the lambkin is not a kind of a galea.; sent6 -> int3: the lambkin is a galea that is an upset.; int3 -> int4: the lambkin is a galea.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the yashmak is not testate.; int6 -> int7: something is not testate.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the waders is not a depolarization and it is not a kind of a decayed does not hold.; sent3 -> int9: if the fact that the waders is both not a depolarization and not a decayed is not right then it is a Reid.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the waders is a Reid. ; $context$ = sent1: that the waders does not rabbet cymene and it is not weak is not true. sent2: the lambkin is epigastric and does not symphonize. sent3: if that something is both not a depolarization and not a decayed is not right it is a Reid. sent4: the fact that the formalwear is not a depolarization but it is glomerular is not correct. sent5: if the formalwear is not non-glomerular but it is not actable the lambkin is not a galea. sent6: everything is both a galea and an upset. sent7: everything does upset. sent8: if the yashmak is testate the formalwear is glomerular but it is not actable. sent9: the formalwear is not non-glomerular. sent10: the fact that the fact that the waders is not a kind of a depolarization and it is not a kind of a decayed is false is correct if there is something such that it is not testate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the yashmak is testate.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the formalwear is both glomerular and not actable.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the lambkin is not a kind of a galea.; sent6 -> int3: the lambkin is a galea that is an upset.; int3 -> int4: the lambkin is a galea.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the yashmak is not testate.; int6 -> int7: something is not testate.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the waders is not a depolarization and it is not a kind of a decayed does not hold.; sent3 -> int9: if the fact that the waders is both not a depolarization and not a decayed is not right then it is a Reid.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__