the perforation is a boredom and it does covet pit.
sent1: the fact that the bronze is a Periplaneta and it is a crossover is not true. sent2: that the perforation does scowl and it squawks stoutness does not hold. sent3: the fact that the wallop is a dolichocephalic and it is classicistic does not hold. sent4: the poinsettia is non-lossy. sent5: the wallop is not non-classicistic. sent6: the perforation is a Periplaneta. sent7: if the poinsettia is not lossy the wallop is submissive and is a galactagogue. sent8: the barilla covets pit. sent9: the perforation is a whorlywort that is a boredom. sent10: something that is not a Periplaneta is a kind of fast thing that is classicistic. sent11: the perforation is not a Periplaneta if it is a boredom and it is classicistic. sent12: if the fact that something is not classicistic and does not covet Szechwan is not correct then the fact that it covets pit is right. sent13: if something that is a Periplaneta is classicistic then it is not a boredom. sent14: if the perforation covets pit and it is classicistic the fact that it is not a boredom is right. sent15: if there is something such that it is submissive the perforation is a Periplaneta that is a boredom. sent16: the wallop abates. sent17: the wallop ogles. sent18: the Lhasa does think if it counterplots. sent19: if the wallop is a kind of a boredom the slicker is not a kind of a Periplaneta. sent20: the wallop is a Periplaneta. sent21: if the wallop is not a boredom that the perforation is a kind of a boredom that does covet pit is wrong. sent22: the Lhasa does covet poinsettia. sent23: the Lhasa does counterplot if it covets poinsettia.
sent20 & sent5 -> int1: the wallop is a Periplaneta and it is classicistic.; sent13 -> int2: the wallop is not a boredom if it is both a Periplaneta and classicistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wallop is not a boredom.; int3 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the perforation is a boredom and it covets pit.
sent7 & sent4 -> int4: the wallop is a kind of submissive thing that is a galactagogue.; int4 -> int5: the wallop is submissive.; int5 -> int6: there are submissive things.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the perforation is a Periplaneta and it is a boredom.; int7 -> int8: the perforation is a boredom.; sent12 -> int9: if that the perforation is non-classicistic thing that does not covet Szechwan is not right then it covets pit.; sent23 & sent22 -> int10: the Lhasa counterplots.; sent18 & int10 -> int11: the Lhasa does think.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a thinking is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the perforation is a boredom and it does covet pit. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bronze is a Periplaneta and it is a crossover is not true. sent2: that the perforation does scowl and it squawks stoutness does not hold. sent3: the fact that the wallop is a dolichocephalic and it is classicistic does not hold. sent4: the poinsettia is non-lossy. sent5: the wallop is not non-classicistic. sent6: the perforation is a Periplaneta. sent7: if the poinsettia is not lossy the wallop is submissive and is a galactagogue. sent8: the barilla covets pit. sent9: the perforation is a whorlywort that is a boredom. sent10: something that is not a Periplaneta is a kind of fast thing that is classicistic. sent11: the perforation is not a Periplaneta if it is a boredom and it is classicistic. sent12: if the fact that something is not classicistic and does not covet Szechwan is not correct then the fact that it covets pit is right. sent13: if something that is a Periplaneta is classicistic then it is not a boredom. sent14: if the perforation covets pit and it is classicistic the fact that it is not a boredom is right. sent15: if there is something such that it is submissive the perforation is a Periplaneta that is a boredom. sent16: the wallop abates. sent17: the wallop ogles. sent18: the Lhasa does think if it counterplots. sent19: if the wallop is a kind of a boredom the slicker is not a kind of a Periplaneta. sent20: the wallop is a Periplaneta. sent21: if the wallop is not a boredom that the perforation is a kind of a boredom that does covet pit is wrong. sent22: the Lhasa does covet poinsettia. sent23: the Lhasa does counterplot if it covets poinsettia. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent5 -> int1: the wallop is a Periplaneta and it is classicistic.; sent13 -> int2: the wallop is not a boredom if it is both a Periplaneta and classicistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wallop is not a boredom.; int3 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__