not the welding groundsheet but the multilateralness occurs.
sent1: the relining millwork occurs and/or the democraticness does not occur. sent2: the headway occurs if that the welding barbasco does not occur and the welding Spartan does not occur is not right. sent3: that the runicness does not occur is prevented by that the legislation happens. sent4: both the educating and the syndeticness happens. sent5: the fact that that the eutherianness happens and the airstream does not occur does not hold hold. sent6: the fact that the irrigation does not occur and the shattering aerialist does not occur is not right. sent7: the ecclesiasticalness occurs if the fact that the irrigation does not occur and the shattering aerialist does not occur does not hold. sent8: the fact that the relining millwork happens and/or the democraticness does not occur is not true if the legislation does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the shattering aerialist does not occur is not false both the waxenness and the runicness occurs. sent10: the porphyriticness occurs. sent11: the multilateralness occurs and the scoffing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the legislation does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the relining millwork or the undemocraticness or both occurs is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the legislation happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the runicness does not occur is false.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: the ecclesiasticalness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the runicness and the ecclesiasticalness happens.; sent11 -> int7: the multilateralness happens.;
both the waxenness and the considerableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = not the welding groundsheet but the multilateralness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the relining millwork occurs and/or the democraticness does not occur. sent2: the headway occurs if that the welding barbasco does not occur and the welding Spartan does not occur is not right. sent3: that the runicness does not occur is prevented by that the legislation happens. sent4: both the educating and the syndeticness happens. sent5: the fact that that the eutherianness happens and the airstream does not occur does not hold hold. sent6: the fact that the irrigation does not occur and the shattering aerialist does not occur is not right. sent7: the ecclesiasticalness occurs if the fact that the irrigation does not occur and the shattering aerialist does not occur does not hold. sent8: the fact that the relining millwork happens and/or the democraticness does not occur is not true if the legislation does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the shattering aerialist does not occur is not false both the waxenness and the runicness occurs. sent10: the porphyriticness occurs. sent11: the multilateralness occurs and the scoffing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the legislation does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the relining millwork or the undemocraticness or both occurs is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the legislation happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the runicness does not occur is false.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: the ecclesiasticalness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the runicness and the ecclesiasticalness happens.; sent11 -> int7: the multilateralness happens.; __UNKNOWN__