the fact that the homospory is not an acceleration but it is mesomorphic is incorrect.
sent1: if the ready-to-wear is Anglophilic the fact that the compensation is a pullulation is not wrong. sent2: if the ox does not deduce Cabomba it is not perianal. sent3: if something is a kind of a pullulation it does live. sent4: the stonechat is not nonconformist and not living if the compensation is not living. sent5: the ox does not deduce Cabomba and is not a decoy. sent6: that the stonechat is both not nonconformist and non-living does not hold if there is something such that it is not perianal. sent7: if the fact that the homospory is not an acceleration and is mesomorphic is incorrect then the ready-to-wear is not non-Anglophilic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the homospory is not an acceleration but mesomorphic does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the ready-to-wear is Anglophilic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the compensation is a pullulation.; sent3 -> int3: if the compensation is a pullulation then it is living.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the compensation lives.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the stonechat is non-nonconformist thing that is not living.; sent5 -> int6: the ox does not deduce Cabomba.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the ox is not perianal.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not perianal.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the fact that that the stonechat is not a kind of a nonconformist and it does not live is not right is right.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the homospory is not an acceleration but it is mesomorphic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ready-to-wear is Anglophilic the fact that the compensation is a pullulation is not wrong. sent2: if the ox does not deduce Cabomba it is not perianal. sent3: if something is a kind of a pullulation it does live. sent4: the stonechat is not nonconformist and not living if the compensation is not living. sent5: the ox does not deduce Cabomba and is not a decoy. sent6: that the stonechat is both not nonconformist and non-living does not hold if there is something such that it is not perianal. sent7: if the fact that the homospory is not an acceleration and is mesomorphic is incorrect then the ready-to-wear is not non-Anglophilic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the homospory is not an acceleration but mesomorphic does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the ready-to-wear is Anglophilic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the compensation is a pullulation.; sent3 -> int3: if the compensation is a pullulation then it is living.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the compensation lives.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the stonechat is non-nonconformist thing that is not living.; sent5 -> int6: the ox does not deduce Cabomba.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the ox is not perianal.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not perianal.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the fact that that the stonechat is not a kind of a nonconformist and it does not live is not right is right.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__