the biblicalness does not occur.
sent1: that the fact that the glimpsing happens and the julienning nutritiousness occurs is not correct hold. sent2: that the normotensiveness happens and the genesis occurs is wrong if the solfege happens. sent3: the disguising sniffler occurs. sent4: that the barricading Ancohuma happens and the enolicness occurs does not hold. sent5: if the genesis occurs the narcotraffic occurs. sent6: if the julienning haunting occurs that the permeating but not the mix occurs is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the theatricalness occurs and the julienning russet happens is not right. sent8: the trim does not occur. sent9: the swearing does not occur. sent10: that both the normotensiveness and the genesis occurs does not hold. sent11: the detailing happens. sent12: that the housing occurs and the captain occurs is false. sent13: the tillage and the cyprianness occurs. sent14: the theatrical does not occur if the reconstruction and the slander occurs. sent15: the localization occurs and the clapping Smilax occurs. sent16: if the narcotraffic occurs and the biblicalness occurs the restrictiveness does not occur. sent17: both the solfege and the Turkey occurs. sent18: the expatiation does not occur. sent19: the clapping Eurylaimidae occurs. sent20: the restrictiveness occurs. sent21: the narcotraffic occurs if the fact that the normotensiveness occurs and the genesis does not occur is incorrect. sent22: the fact that the normotensiveness occurs but the genesis does not occur is not right if that the solfege occurs hold. sent23: the anamorphicness happens.
sent17 -> int1: the solfege happens.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: that the normotensiveness but not the genesis happens does not hold.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the narcotraffic happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biblicalness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the narcotraffic and the biblicalness occurs.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the restrictiveness does not occur.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the biblicalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the glimpsing happens and the julienning nutritiousness occurs is not correct hold. sent2: that the normotensiveness happens and the genesis occurs is wrong if the solfege happens. sent3: the disguising sniffler occurs. sent4: that the barricading Ancohuma happens and the enolicness occurs does not hold. sent5: if the genesis occurs the narcotraffic occurs. sent6: if the julienning haunting occurs that the permeating but not the mix occurs is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the theatricalness occurs and the julienning russet happens is not right. sent8: the trim does not occur. sent9: the swearing does not occur. sent10: that both the normotensiveness and the genesis occurs does not hold. sent11: the detailing happens. sent12: that the housing occurs and the captain occurs is false. sent13: the tillage and the cyprianness occurs. sent14: the theatrical does not occur if the reconstruction and the slander occurs. sent15: the localization occurs and the clapping Smilax occurs. sent16: if the narcotraffic occurs and the biblicalness occurs the restrictiveness does not occur. sent17: both the solfege and the Turkey occurs. sent18: the expatiation does not occur. sent19: the clapping Eurylaimidae occurs. sent20: the restrictiveness occurs. sent21: the narcotraffic occurs if the fact that the normotensiveness occurs and the genesis does not occur is incorrect. sent22: the fact that the normotensiveness occurs but the genesis does not occur is not right if that the solfege occurs hold. sent23: the anamorphicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the solfege happens.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: that the normotensiveness but not the genesis happens does not hold.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the narcotraffic happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biblicalness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the narcotraffic and the biblicalness occurs.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the restrictiveness does not occur.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__