if the Romanshness occurs the nativistness happens.
sent1: if the strangeness does not occur but the swan happens the mangling Munich does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the matinee does not occur and/or the briefing Satureja does not occur is incorrect then the nativist happens. sent3: if the tinseling Satureja does not occur then the Romansh does not occur and the aspersion does not occur. sent4: that the reenlistment does not occur and the incorporating exorbitance happens prevents the cook. sent5: that the relaxation does not occur is triggered by that both the tinseling Satureja and the rupestralness happens. sent6: the aftercare does not occur if the trihydroxiness and the takedown occurs. sent7: if the rupestralness does not occur not the incorporating osmoreceptor but the tinseling Satureja happens. sent8: that the tinseling antifreeze and the rupestralness happens is brought about by that the mangling Munich does not occur. sent9: the strangeness does not occur but the swanning occurs if the briefing cucumber happens. sent10: the fact that the matinee does not occur and/or the briefing Satureja does not occur is wrong if the relaxation does not occur. sent11: if the mangling Munich does not occur then the tinseling antifreeze happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tinseling Satureja does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Romanshness does not occur and the aspersion does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the Romansh does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Romansh happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tinseling Satureja happens.;
the incorporating osmoreceptor does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the Romanshness occurs the nativistness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the strangeness does not occur but the swan happens the mangling Munich does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the matinee does not occur and/or the briefing Satureja does not occur is incorrect then the nativist happens. sent3: if the tinseling Satureja does not occur then the Romansh does not occur and the aspersion does not occur. sent4: that the reenlistment does not occur and the incorporating exorbitance happens prevents the cook. sent5: that the relaxation does not occur is triggered by that both the tinseling Satureja and the rupestralness happens. sent6: the aftercare does not occur if the trihydroxiness and the takedown occurs. sent7: if the rupestralness does not occur not the incorporating osmoreceptor but the tinseling Satureja happens. sent8: that the tinseling antifreeze and the rupestralness happens is brought about by that the mangling Munich does not occur. sent9: the strangeness does not occur but the swanning occurs if the briefing cucumber happens. sent10: the fact that the matinee does not occur and/or the briefing Satureja does not occur is wrong if the relaxation does not occur. sent11: if the mangling Munich does not occur then the tinseling antifreeze happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tinseling Satureja does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Romanshness does not occur and the aspersion does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the Romansh does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Romansh happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tinseling Satureja happens.; __UNKNOWN__