the infant's-breath does not hand Newcomb.
sent1: the parent is not a kind of an ergotism. sent2: the fact that the fact that the parent does not dowse and it is not a kind of a NIPR is not right is not false if that the infant's-breath does not disabuse Galeorhinus is true. sent3: something does not hand mycophagist if the fact that it is not a pyromancer and does not disabuse adulteration is not correct. sent4: if the oxaprozin is not a kind of an unrest the fact that the parent is not a pyromancer and it does not disabuse adulteration is false. sent5: if something does profess then the fact that it does not disabuse Galeorhinus and is not cellular is wrong. sent6: if something does not hand mycophagist it professes and it is an ergotism. sent7: something that does disabuse Galeorhinus does profess and is not cellular. sent8: if something that professes is not cellular it does not hand Newcomb. sent9: if the parent is a dowse but it is not a NIPR it does not hand Newcomb.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the infant's-breath does not disabuse Galeorhinus is not wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the parent is not a kind of a dowse and it is not a NIPR is wrong.; sent7 -> int2: the infant's-breath professes but it is not cellular if it disabuses Galeorhinus.; sent8 -> int3: if the infant's-breath professes and is not cellular then it does not hand Newcomb.;
the infant's-breath does hand Newcomb.
sent5 -> int4: that the parent does not disabuse Galeorhinus and is not cellular is wrong if it professes.; sent6 -> int5: if the parent does not hand mycophagist it professes and it is an ergotism.; sent3 -> int6: the parent does not hand mycophagist if the fact that it is not a kind of a pyromancer and does not disabuse adulteration is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the infant's-breath does not hand Newcomb. ; $context$ = sent1: the parent is not a kind of an ergotism. sent2: the fact that the fact that the parent does not dowse and it is not a kind of a NIPR is not right is not false if that the infant's-breath does not disabuse Galeorhinus is true. sent3: something does not hand mycophagist if the fact that it is not a pyromancer and does not disabuse adulteration is not correct. sent4: if the oxaprozin is not a kind of an unrest the fact that the parent is not a pyromancer and it does not disabuse adulteration is false. sent5: if something does profess then the fact that it does not disabuse Galeorhinus and is not cellular is wrong. sent6: if something does not hand mycophagist it professes and it is an ergotism. sent7: something that does disabuse Galeorhinus does profess and is not cellular. sent8: if something that professes is not cellular it does not hand Newcomb. sent9: if the parent is a dowse but it is not a NIPR it does not hand Newcomb. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the infant's-breath does not disabuse Galeorhinus is not wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the parent is not a kind of a dowse and it is not a NIPR is wrong.; sent7 -> int2: the infant's-breath professes but it is not cellular if it disabuses Galeorhinus.; sent8 -> int3: if the infant's-breath professes and is not cellular then it does not hand Newcomb.; __UNKNOWN__