the fact that there exists something such that if it is a postdoctoral then it Frenchifies scrape is incorrect.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a postdoctoral it does Frenchify scrape and buys. sent2: something is not a postdoctoral if that it is not intensive and/or it is unprofessional is not true. sent3: if the effacement does trip amalgamation then the homosexual trip amalgamation. sent4: the fact that the berm does Frenchify scrape is not wrong if it is unprofessional. sent5: if something is not a kind of a second it is a kind of a segment that is congruent. sent6: if something is not intensive or it is unprofessional or both then it Frenchifies scrape. sent7: if something is not a supremacist then the effacement is thenal and/or it does trip amalgamation. sent8: the berm is not unprofessional. sent9: if the effacement is thenal then the fact that the homosexual does trip amalgamation hold. sent10: the berm is a kind of a postdoctoral if that it is not intensive or it is unprofessional or both is not correct. sent11: if the fact that something is not intensive and/or it is unprofessional is incorrect then it is a kind of a postdoctoral. sent12: an unprofessional thing does Frenchify scrape. sent13: the fact that that the homosexual is both not a Spalacidae and the second is not true if the homosexual trips amalgamation is not wrong. sent14: the telomere is not unprofessional if the fact that it is Apocryphal and/or implodes is wrong. sent15: the lionfish is not a kind of a second if there exists something such that that it is both not a Spalacidae and a second is wrong. sent16: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a supremacist.
sent2 -> int1: if that the berm is either non-intensive or not professional or both is incorrect then it is not postdoctoral.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the berm is not intensive or is unprofessional or both is wrong.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the berm is not a postdoctoral.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the berm is postdoctoral.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the berm is either not intensive or unprofessional or both.; sent6 -> int5: if the berm is not intensive and/or is unprofessional that it does Frenchify scrape is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the berm does Frenchify scrape.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: if the berm is a postdoctoral it does Frenchify scrape.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the tillage is not tractive or it does buy or both.
sent1 -> int8: the tillage does Frenchify scrape and does buy if it is not postdoctoral.; sent5 -> int9: the lionfish segments and is congruent if it does not second.; sent16 & sent7 -> int10: the effacement is thenal and/or does trip amalgamation.; int10 & sent9 & sent3 -> int11: the homosexual does trip amalgamation.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: that the homosexual is not a Spalacidae but it is a second does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is not a Spalacidae and it seconds is wrong.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the lionfish is non-second.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the lionfish does segment and is congruent.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is a kind of a segment and is congruent.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a postdoctoral then it Frenchifies scrape is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a postdoctoral it does Frenchify scrape and buys. sent2: something is not a postdoctoral if that it is not intensive and/or it is unprofessional is not true. sent3: if the effacement does trip amalgamation then the homosexual trip amalgamation. sent4: the fact that the berm does Frenchify scrape is not wrong if it is unprofessional. sent5: if something is not a kind of a second it is a kind of a segment that is congruent. sent6: if something is not intensive or it is unprofessional or both then it Frenchifies scrape. sent7: if something is not a supremacist then the effacement is thenal and/or it does trip amalgamation. sent8: the berm is not unprofessional. sent9: if the effacement is thenal then the fact that the homosexual does trip amalgamation hold. sent10: the berm is a kind of a postdoctoral if that it is not intensive or it is unprofessional or both is not correct. sent11: if the fact that something is not intensive and/or it is unprofessional is incorrect then it is a kind of a postdoctoral. sent12: an unprofessional thing does Frenchify scrape. sent13: the fact that that the homosexual is both not a Spalacidae and the second is not true if the homosexual trips amalgamation is not wrong. sent14: the telomere is not unprofessional if the fact that it is Apocryphal and/or implodes is wrong. sent15: the lionfish is not a kind of a second if there exists something such that that it is both not a Spalacidae and a second is wrong. sent16: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a supremacist. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if that the berm is either non-intensive or not professional or both is incorrect then it is not postdoctoral.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the berm is not intensive or is unprofessional or both is wrong.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the berm is not a postdoctoral.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the berm is postdoctoral.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the berm is either not intensive or unprofessional or both.; sent6 -> int5: if the berm is not intensive and/or is unprofessional that it does Frenchify scrape is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the berm does Frenchify scrape.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: if the berm is a postdoctoral it does Frenchify scrape.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__