the intermediate does declaw superfamily.
sent1: the fettuccine is a kind of a samosa if there exists something such that it is not antagonistic. sent2: there are antagonistic things. sent3: the fettuccine does declaw superfamily. sent4: if there is something such that it is non-antagonistic the fettuccine does deactivate olivenite and is a samosa. sent5: the fettuccine is a samosa. sent6: if the fettuccine deactivates olivenite then the intermediate does declaw superfamily. sent7: if that something is antagonistic or it does not deactivate olivenite or both is not true it does not declaw superfamily. sent8: the fettuccine does declaw superfamily and is a samosa. sent9: there is something such that it is not antagonistic.
sent9 & sent4 -> int1: the fettuccine deactivates olivenite and it is a samosa.; int1 -> int2: the fettuccine deactivates olivenite.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the intermediate does not declaw superfamily.
sent7 -> int3: if the fact that the intermediate is antagonistic and/or it does not deactivate olivenite is wrong then it does not declaw superfamily.;
$hypothesis$ = the intermediate does declaw superfamily. ; $context$ = sent1: the fettuccine is a kind of a samosa if there exists something such that it is not antagonistic. sent2: there are antagonistic things. sent3: the fettuccine does declaw superfamily. sent4: if there is something such that it is non-antagonistic the fettuccine does deactivate olivenite and is a samosa. sent5: the fettuccine is a samosa. sent6: if the fettuccine deactivates olivenite then the intermediate does declaw superfamily. sent7: if that something is antagonistic or it does not deactivate olivenite or both is not true it does not declaw superfamily. sent8: the fettuccine does declaw superfamily and is a samosa. sent9: there is something such that it is not antagonistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent4 -> int1: the fettuccine deactivates olivenite and it is a samosa.; int1 -> int2: the fettuccine deactivates olivenite.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__