the msasa does not copy Kiowa.
sent1: if that something does not brecciate but it gentles is not correct then that it does copy Kiowa is not wrong. sent2: something is downstream if the fact that it is an absorption is true. sent3: something that is not a kind of a catapult and is not a Rhabdoviridae is not punctual. sent4: if something is punctual then the fact that it does not brecciate and does gentle is false. sent5: if something does gentle and does brecciate the msasa does copy Kiowa. sent6: something is a kind of an absorption if it is a Durant. sent7: the Hindustani is not a kind of a catapult and it is not a kind of a Rhabdoviridae if the cytochrome is downstream. sent8: the cytochrome does gentle. sent9: everything is a WAN and is a Durant. sent10: the cytochrome does brecciate. sent11: something does brecciate if it is punctual. sent12: the nominator does copy Kiowa.
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the cytochrome gentles and it brecciates.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does gentle and it does brecciate.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the Hindustani does copy Kiowa is true.
sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the Hindustani does not brecciate and does gentle is incorrect then it does copy Kiowa.; sent4 -> int4: if the Hindustani is punctual then the fact that it does not brecciate and gentles is wrong.; sent3 -> int5: if the Hindustani is both not a catapult and not a Rhabdoviridae then that it is punctual is not incorrect.; sent2 -> int6: if the cytochrome is an absorption then it is downstream.; sent6 -> int7: if the cytochrome is a kind of a Durant it is an absorption.; sent9 -> int8: the cytochrome is a kind of a WAN that is a Durant.; int8 -> int9: the cytochrome is a Durant.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the cytochrome is an absorption.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the cytochrome is downstream.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the Hindustani is not a catapult and is not a Rhabdoviridae.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the Hindustani is punctual.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the Hindustani does not brecciate and does gentle does not hold.; int3 & int14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the msasa does not copy Kiowa. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does not brecciate but it gentles is not correct then that it does copy Kiowa is not wrong. sent2: something is downstream if the fact that it is an absorption is true. sent3: something that is not a kind of a catapult and is not a Rhabdoviridae is not punctual. sent4: if something is punctual then the fact that it does not brecciate and does gentle is false. sent5: if something does gentle and does brecciate the msasa does copy Kiowa. sent6: something is a kind of an absorption if it is a Durant. sent7: the Hindustani is not a kind of a catapult and it is not a kind of a Rhabdoviridae if the cytochrome is downstream. sent8: the cytochrome does gentle. sent9: everything is a WAN and is a Durant. sent10: the cytochrome does brecciate. sent11: something does brecciate if it is punctual. sent12: the nominator does copy Kiowa. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the cytochrome gentles and it brecciates.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does gentle and it does brecciate.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__