the garnet is not a kind of a amiodarone.
sent1: if the slicer is not a dissolubility that the cigar does not drink brushed but it is a kind of a dissolubility is wrong. sent2: the argyll does not drink epicure if that the slicer is a dissolubility and/or does not drink epicure does not hold. sent3: the potassium does emote reasoning if that the cigar does not drink brushed and is a kind of a dissolubility is not true. sent4: the slicer is not a dissolubility if there is something such that that it is not aspectual and does emote blogger is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is not aspectual and it does emote blogger is wrong. sent6: that if that something does emote reasoning and it is a kind of a amiodarone is not correct then it does not emote reasoning hold. sent7: if there exists something such that it does emote reasoning the garnet is not a kind of a amiodarone. sent8: if something does drink brushed and it is a ingress then it is not a amiodarone. sent9: the fact that the potassium does not emote reasoning and is a kind of a dissolubility is wrong if the slicer is not a kind of a dissolubility. sent10: if the cigar does drink brushed the potassium does emote reasoning. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a amiodarone is not wrong the fact that the slicer does emote reasoning and is a amiodarone is incorrect.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the slicer is not a dissolubility.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: that the cigar does not drink brushed but it is a dissolubility is not right.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the potassium does emote reasoning.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it emotes reasoning.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the argyll does not drink epicure.
sent6 -> int5: if the fact that the slicer does emote reasoning and it is a kind of a amiodarone is incorrect then the fact that it does not emote reasoning is right.; sent8 -> int6: that the cigar is not the amiodarone if the cigar does drink brushed and is a ingress is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the garnet is not a kind of a amiodarone. ; $context$ = sent1: if the slicer is not a dissolubility that the cigar does not drink brushed but it is a kind of a dissolubility is wrong. sent2: the argyll does not drink epicure if that the slicer is a dissolubility and/or does not drink epicure does not hold. sent3: the potassium does emote reasoning if that the cigar does not drink brushed and is a kind of a dissolubility is not true. sent4: the slicer is not a dissolubility if there is something such that that it is not aspectual and does emote blogger is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is not aspectual and it does emote blogger is wrong. sent6: that if that something does emote reasoning and it is a kind of a amiodarone is not correct then it does not emote reasoning hold. sent7: if there exists something such that it does emote reasoning the garnet is not a kind of a amiodarone. sent8: if something does drink brushed and it is a ingress then it is not a amiodarone. sent9: the fact that the potassium does not emote reasoning and is a kind of a dissolubility is wrong if the slicer is not a kind of a dissolubility. sent10: if the cigar does drink brushed the potassium does emote reasoning. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a amiodarone is not wrong the fact that the slicer does emote reasoning and is a amiodarone is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the slicer is not a dissolubility.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: that the cigar does not drink brushed but it is a dissolubility is not right.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the potassium does emote reasoning.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it emotes reasoning.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__