there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Lumpenus and not Hegelian is not right.
sent1: if the speedometer does not suspend Italian the fact that it is a disagreement and it does not clue challenge does not hold. sent2: that the pinto is metastable but it is not a disagreement is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the speedometer is a Hegelian that does not suspend ampersand does not hold if it is not logistics. sent4: that the speedometer does debase and does not clue odometer is not true if it is not a Hegelian. sent5: that the speedometer is both a Lumpenus and not a Hegelian is incorrect if it is not a disagreement. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a Lumpenus and it is a Hegelian is incorrect. sent7: that the chrysoprase is bisectional and not a disagreement is wrong if it is not a kind of a axil. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Lumpenus and it is not a Hegelian.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Lumpenus and not Hegelian is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the speedometer does not suspend Italian the fact that it is a disagreement and it does not clue challenge does not hold. sent2: that the pinto is metastable but it is not a disagreement is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the speedometer is a Hegelian that does not suspend ampersand does not hold if it is not logistics. sent4: that the speedometer does debase and does not clue odometer is not true if it is not a Hegelian. sent5: that the speedometer is both a Lumpenus and not a Hegelian is incorrect if it is not a disagreement. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a Lumpenus and it is a Hegelian is incorrect. sent7: that the chrysoprase is bisectional and not a disagreement is wrong if it is not a kind of a axil. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Lumpenus and it is not a Hegelian. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__