that the bandstand is not secular and eliminates nurturance does not hold if the toenail is a Bolshevik.
sent1: if the toenail does not eliminate nurturance the bandstand is non-secular thing that eliminate nurturance. sent2: if something that is a kind of a sauropod is febrile it does not defibrillate handrest. sent3: if something does recycle and is Bolshevik then the fact that it does not eliminate nurturance hold. sent4: if the samarium does eliminate nurturance and is a Bolshevik it does not defibrillate archosaur. sent5: the samarium does not defibrillate archosaur if that the toenail is not febrile but it does recycle is not correct. sent6: the fact that the bandstand is secular and it eliminates nurturance does not hold if the toenail is a Bolshevik. sent7: that the bandstand is not secular but it does eliminate nurturance is not right if the toenail does not eliminate nurturance. sent8: the footwear interrelates bandstand. sent9: the samarium does defibrillate archosaur if the footwear interrelates bandstand. sent10: The bandstand interrelates footwear. sent11: the fact that the toenail is febrile and it does recycle is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the toenail is not febrile but it recycles is wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the samarium does not defibrillate archosaur.; sent9 & sent8 -> int2: the samarium defibrillates archosaur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the toenail is a kind of non-febrile thing that does recycle.; int4 -> int5: the toenail recycles.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the toenail is a Bolshevik.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: the toenail does recycle and it is not non-Bolshevik.; sent3 -> int7: the fact that the toenail does not eliminate nurturance is right if it does recycle and is a Bolshevik.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the toenail does not eliminate nurturance.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: that the bandstand is not secular but it eliminates nurturance does not hold.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the maraschino does not defibrillate handrest if it is a kind of a sauropod and it is febrile.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the bandstand is not secular and eliminates nurturance does not hold if the toenail is a Bolshevik. ; $context$ = sent1: if the toenail does not eliminate nurturance the bandstand is non-secular thing that eliminate nurturance. sent2: if something that is a kind of a sauropod is febrile it does not defibrillate handrest. sent3: if something does recycle and is Bolshevik then the fact that it does not eliminate nurturance hold. sent4: if the samarium does eliminate nurturance and is a Bolshevik it does not defibrillate archosaur. sent5: the samarium does not defibrillate archosaur if that the toenail is not febrile but it does recycle is not correct. sent6: the fact that the bandstand is secular and it eliminates nurturance does not hold if the toenail is a Bolshevik. sent7: that the bandstand is not secular but it does eliminate nurturance is not right if the toenail does not eliminate nurturance. sent8: the footwear interrelates bandstand. sent9: the samarium does defibrillate archosaur if the footwear interrelates bandstand. sent10: The bandstand interrelates footwear. sent11: the fact that the toenail is febrile and it does recycle is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the toenail is not febrile but it recycles is wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the samarium does not defibrillate archosaur.; sent9 & sent8 -> int2: the samarium defibrillates archosaur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the toenail is a kind of non-febrile thing that does recycle.; int4 -> int5: the toenail recycles.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the toenail is a Bolshevik.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: the toenail does recycle and it is not non-Bolshevik.; sent3 -> int7: the fact that the toenail does not eliminate nurturance is right if it does recycle and is a Bolshevik.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the toenail does not eliminate nurturance.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: that the bandstand is not secular but it eliminates nurturance does not hold.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__