the supremacist is non-sepaloid thing that is not a kind of a Teller.
sent1: there are non-interoceptive things. sent2: if there is something such that it is not interoceptive then the fact that the crayon does guggle verge and is interoceptive is wrong. sent3: the patroness does not dangle siege if that it is a clear is right. sent4: the supremacist is not sepaloid if the patroness does not dangle siege. sent5: the patroness is sepaloid if that it does clear and it is not sepaloid does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the patroness does not dangle siege hold then the supremacist is not sepaloid and it is not a kind of a Teller. sent7: if the crayon is not interoceptive then it is not a Casper. sent8: the fact that the rung is a Casper that is a kind of a clear does not hold. sent9: if that something does guggle verge and it is interoceptive is not correct then it is not a kind of a Casper. sent10: if that something is not a clear and not a Casper is wrong that it does not dangle siege is right. sent11: the bubo is not sepaloid.
sent9 -> int1: if that the crayon guggles verge and it is interoceptive does not hold it is not a Casper.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the crayon does guggle verge and it is interoceptive does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crayon is not a Casper.; sent10 -> int4: the patroness does not dangle siege if the fact that it is both not a clear and not a Casper is not correct.;
the fact that the supremacist is both not sepaloid and not a Teller is false.
sent8 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a Casper and it is a kind of a clear is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the supremacist is non-sepaloid thing that is not a kind of a Teller. ; $context$ = sent1: there are non-interoceptive things. sent2: if there is something such that it is not interoceptive then the fact that the crayon does guggle verge and is interoceptive is wrong. sent3: the patroness does not dangle siege if that it is a clear is right. sent4: the supremacist is not sepaloid if the patroness does not dangle siege. sent5: the patroness is sepaloid if that it does clear and it is not sepaloid does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the patroness does not dangle siege hold then the supremacist is not sepaloid and it is not a kind of a Teller. sent7: if the crayon is not interoceptive then it is not a Casper. sent8: the fact that the rung is a Casper that is a kind of a clear does not hold. sent9: if that something does guggle verge and it is interoceptive is not correct then it is not a kind of a Casper. sent10: if that something is not a clear and not a Casper is wrong that it does not dangle siege is right. sent11: the bubo is not sepaloid. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if that the crayon guggles verge and it is interoceptive does not hold it is not a Casper.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the crayon does guggle verge and it is interoceptive does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crayon is not a Casper.; sent10 -> int4: the patroness does not dangle siege if the fact that it is both not a clear and not a Casper is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__