the underwriting pinkroot does not occur.
sent1: the offside does not occur and the balminess does not occur. sent2: that the non-neotenicness and the underwriting acceptation occurs is caused by the sliming hydrosphere. sent3: the underwriting pinkroot does not occur if not the neotenicness but the underwriting acceptation happens. sent4: if the appeal happens and the looping does not occur then the sliming hydrosphere does not occur. sent5: the sensitization occurs. sent6: if the X-raying occurs then the fact that the Dipylonness does not occur and the spectrometricness does not occur is not true. sent7: the appeal but not the loop occurs. sent8: the agonisticness does not occur if the underwriting hyphenation and the non-foreness occurs. sent9: either the encephalography occurs or the underwriting pentagon does not occur or both. sent10: the locking does not occur if that the underwriting acceptation does not occur and the neotenicness does not occur is not correct. sent11: the underwriting pinkroot happens if the neotenicness occurs. sent12: that the extending catechumen does not occur and/or that the feud does not occur prevents that the extending catechumen happens. sent13: if the underwriting acceptation happens the fact that the encephalography does not occur and the sliming hydrosphere does not occur is false. sent14: that the encephalography does not occur or the underwriting pentagon does not occur or both prevents the encephalography. sent15: the setup but not the cash-and-carriness happens. sent16: the sanitariness is prevented by that the Marathon but not the extending feast happens. sent17: the extending putout does not occur. sent18: the encephalography does not occur and/or the underwriting pentagon does not occur. sent19: the looping does not occur. sent20: the sliming favorite occurs if the carotidness does not occur. sent21: that the looping and the appealing occurs is wrong if the fact that the underwriting pentagon does not occur is not incorrect. sent22: the sliming hydrosphere does not occur if both the appeal and the loop happens. sent23: if the neotenicness does not occur then that the underwriting acceptation happens is right. sent24: the inappropriateness does not occur if the extending Odontophorus but not the balancing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the neotenicness does not occur is not false.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the underwriting acceptation occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the encephalography does not occur and the sliming hydrosphere does not occur does not hold.; sent14 & sent18 -> int3: that the encephalography does not occur is true.; sent4 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the sliming hydrosphere does not occur is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the encephalography does not occur and the sliming hydrosphere does not occur.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the neotenicness happens.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the underwriting pinkroot does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the underwriting pinkroot does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the offside does not occur and the balminess does not occur. sent2: that the non-neotenicness and the underwriting acceptation occurs is caused by the sliming hydrosphere. sent3: the underwriting pinkroot does not occur if not the neotenicness but the underwriting acceptation happens. sent4: if the appeal happens and the looping does not occur then the sliming hydrosphere does not occur. sent5: the sensitization occurs. sent6: if the X-raying occurs then the fact that the Dipylonness does not occur and the spectrometricness does not occur is not true. sent7: the appeal but not the loop occurs. sent8: the agonisticness does not occur if the underwriting hyphenation and the non-foreness occurs. sent9: either the encephalography occurs or the underwriting pentagon does not occur or both. sent10: the locking does not occur if that the underwriting acceptation does not occur and the neotenicness does not occur is not correct. sent11: the underwriting pinkroot happens if the neotenicness occurs. sent12: that the extending catechumen does not occur and/or that the feud does not occur prevents that the extending catechumen happens. sent13: if the underwriting acceptation happens the fact that the encephalography does not occur and the sliming hydrosphere does not occur is false. sent14: that the encephalography does not occur or the underwriting pentagon does not occur or both prevents the encephalography. sent15: the setup but not the cash-and-carriness happens. sent16: the sanitariness is prevented by that the Marathon but not the extending feast happens. sent17: the extending putout does not occur. sent18: the encephalography does not occur and/or the underwriting pentagon does not occur. sent19: the looping does not occur. sent20: the sliming favorite occurs if the carotidness does not occur. sent21: that the looping and the appealing occurs is wrong if the fact that the underwriting pentagon does not occur is not incorrect. sent22: the sliming hydrosphere does not occur if both the appeal and the loop happens. sent23: if the neotenicness does not occur then that the underwriting acceptation happens is right. sent24: the inappropriateness does not occur if the extending Odontophorus but not the balancing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the neotenicness does not occur is not false.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the underwriting acceptation occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the encephalography does not occur and the sliming hydrosphere does not occur does not hold.; sent14 & sent18 -> int3: that the encephalography does not occur is true.; sent4 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the sliming hydrosphere does not occur is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the encephalography does not occur and the sliming hydrosphere does not occur.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the neotenicness happens.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__