the midge is not a gantlet but it is Kantian.
sent1: the midge does rival atrophy and is not non-pressor if it does not rival philhellene. sent2: that the midge is both not clear and not low-interest is not true. sent3: something is not a valedictorian if that it rivals flavorlessness is not wrong. sent4: if the hatchway commutates midge then it is not Kantian. sent5: if the midge is not Kantian it is a gantlet and is pressor. sent6: that the midge is both not a gantlet and Kantian does not hold if the fact that the hatchway is not Kantian is not false. sent7: the hatchway is not obtuse. sent8: the philhellene consummates digestibility and is sessile. sent9: the hatchway commutates bismuth. sent10: that something is not condylar is not wrong if that it does not consummate maze and it does not consummate digestibility is not right. sent11: the hatchway does not commutate self-starter. sent12: that the hatchway is condylar and it is a gantlet is false if the midge is not a gantlet. sent13: the midge is not condylar. sent14: the fact that the hatchway commutates midge and commutates peasanthood hold if it is not pressor. sent15: the hatchway is condylar. sent16: the tossup does not consummate digestibility. sent17: that the hatchway does not consummate maze and it does not consummate digestibility is not true if it is not non-pressor. sent18: the hatchway is not a kind of a gantlet if it is not non-pressor. sent19: the midge consummates digestibility and it is Kantian if it is not pressor. sent20: the midge does not commutate midge. sent21: the midge does not commutate peasanthood if it is Kantian. sent22: the bismuth is a gantlet. sent23: if the hatchway is not pressor it does tail. sent24: if something does consummate digestibility then it is not condylar.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hatchway is pressor.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hatchway does not consummate maze and does not consummate digestibility is not correct.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the hatchway does not consummate maze and does not consummate digestibility is not right it is not condylar.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the hatchway is not condylar is not false.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the hatchway is not pressor.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the hatchway commutates midge and it does commutate peasanthood.; int6 -> int7: the hatchway commutates midge.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: that the hatchway is not Kantian hold.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the midge is not a gantlet but it is Kantian. ; $context$ = sent1: the midge does rival atrophy and is not non-pressor if it does not rival philhellene. sent2: that the midge is both not clear and not low-interest is not true. sent3: something is not a valedictorian if that it rivals flavorlessness is not wrong. sent4: if the hatchway commutates midge then it is not Kantian. sent5: if the midge is not Kantian it is a gantlet and is pressor. sent6: that the midge is both not a gantlet and Kantian does not hold if the fact that the hatchway is not Kantian is not false. sent7: the hatchway is not obtuse. sent8: the philhellene consummates digestibility and is sessile. sent9: the hatchway commutates bismuth. sent10: that something is not condylar is not wrong if that it does not consummate maze and it does not consummate digestibility is not right. sent11: the hatchway does not commutate self-starter. sent12: that the hatchway is condylar and it is a gantlet is false if the midge is not a gantlet. sent13: the midge is not condylar. sent14: the fact that the hatchway commutates midge and commutates peasanthood hold if it is not pressor. sent15: the hatchway is condylar. sent16: the tossup does not consummate digestibility. sent17: that the hatchway does not consummate maze and it does not consummate digestibility is not true if it is not non-pressor. sent18: the hatchway is not a kind of a gantlet if it is not non-pressor. sent19: the midge consummates digestibility and it is Kantian if it is not pressor. sent20: the midge does not commutate midge. sent21: the midge does not commutate peasanthood if it is Kantian. sent22: the bismuth is a gantlet. sent23: if the hatchway is not pressor it does tail. sent24: if something does consummate digestibility then it is not condylar. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hatchway is pressor.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hatchway does not consummate maze and does not consummate digestibility is not correct.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the hatchway does not consummate maze and does not consummate digestibility is not right it is not condylar.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the hatchway is not condylar is not false.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the hatchway is not pressor.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the hatchway commutates midge and it does commutate peasanthood.; int6 -> int7: the hatchway commutates midge.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: that the hatchway is not Kantian hold.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__