there is something such that if it is a cap then the fact that it is not polymorphemic and it is non-unneurotic is false.
sent1: that that the Zealander is not centromeric and is not a vitrectomy is right does not hold if it is consistent. sent2: the Zealander is not polymorphemic and it is not unneurotic if it does cap. sent3: there is something such that if it is a cap it is both not polymorphemic and not unneurotic. sent4: if the fact that the Zealander caps is not incorrect the fact that it is polymorphemic and it is not unneurotic is not true. sent5: if the placental is a shellfire that it is both non-semantics and not polymorphemic is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is a guidance that the fact that it is not ethnological and it is not unexpendable is right does not hold. sent7: if the tachylite is unneurotic then that it is not zygotic and is not a kind of a prince's-plume is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if it caps that it is not polymorphemic and it is unneurotic does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it does reflect placental the fact that it does not result bonus and it does not reflect Muztag does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it does cap that it is both not non-polymorphemic and non-unneurotic is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it results tachylite that it is not binoculars and it does not quadruple is not right. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not an imminence is wrong then the fact that it is non-Calcuttan thing that is not peritoneal does not hold is right. sent13: if the amatungulu is polymorphemic the fact that it is not a roots and is not zygotic is not true. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a referendum then the fact that it does not wake woad and it is not a Marceau is not right. sent15: the fact that something does not wake philosophy and it does not result bonus is not correct if it does reflect Muztag. sent16: that the Zealander is not polymorphemic and is unneurotic is not true if the fact that it does cap is not false. sent17: that the reliever does not cap and it is not a kind of a shame is wrong if that it does not wake clemency does not hold. sent18: the fact that the fact that the Zealander is not polymorphemic and it is not unneurotic is not incorrect does not hold if the fact that it is a kind of a cap is not incorrect. sent19: there is something such that if it wakes gayfeather the fact that it is both not careless and not a uniform is not right.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it reflects Muztag then the fact that it does not wake philosophy and it does not result bonus is wrong.
sent15 -> int1: if the idealization does reflect Muztag the fact that it does not wake philosophy and it does not result bonus does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a cap then the fact that it is not polymorphemic and it is non-unneurotic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the Zealander is not centromeric and is not a vitrectomy is right does not hold if it is consistent. sent2: the Zealander is not polymorphemic and it is not unneurotic if it does cap. sent3: there is something such that if it is a cap it is both not polymorphemic and not unneurotic. sent4: if the fact that the Zealander caps is not incorrect the fact that it is polymorphemic and it is not unneurotic is not true. sent5: if the placental is a shellfire that it is both non-semantics and not polymorphemic is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is a guidance that the fact that it is not ethnological and it is not unexpendable is right does not hold. sent7: if the tachylite is unneurotic then that it is not zygotic and is not a kind of a prince's-plume is not correct. sent8: there is something such that if it caps that it is not polymorphemic and it is unneurotic does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it does reflect placental the fact that it does not result bonus and it does not reflect Muztag does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it does cap that it is both not non-polymorphemic and non-unneurotic is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it results tachylite that it is not binoculars and it does not quadruple is not right. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not an imminence is wrong then the fact that it is non-Calcuttan thing that is not peritoneal does not hold is right. sent13: if the amatungulu is polymorphemic the fact that it is not a roots and is not zygotic is not true. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a referendum then the fact that it does not wake woad and it is not a Marceau is not right. sent15: the fact that something does not wake philosophy and it does not result bonus is not correct if it does reflect Muztag. sent16: that the Zealander is not polymorphemic and is unneurotic is not true if the fact that it does cap is not false. sent17: that the reliever does not cap and it is not a kind of a shame is wrong if that it does not wake clemency does not hold. sent18: the fact that the fact that the Zealander is not polymorphemic and it is not unneurotic is not incorrect does not hold if the fact that it is a kind of a cap is not incorrect. sent19: there is something such that if it wakes gayfeather the fact that it is both not careless and not a uniform is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__