the mute does add surpriser.
sent1: if that the ideal is not microeconomics and not a Poa is incorrect then the mute is not a Poa. sent2: something does add surpriser if that it does not atrophy and is biotitic is not true. sent3: if something does not add ideal that it is not a kind of an incarnation and it is biotitic is incorrect. sent4: that that the mute is not an atrophy but it is biotitic is not wrong is not true if the caldron is not an atrophy. sent5: something does not add ideal. sent6: that the balbriggan is non-Avestan if there exists something such that that that it does not add surpriser and does not atrophy is right is false is not false. sent7: the dicumarol does not add ideal if there is something such that the fact that it is a nitroglycerin and it add ideal is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the balbriggan is a kind of a nitroglycerin and is not Avestan is false if something does not add ideal. sent9: if something is not a Poa then it does add cymene and it is trigonometric. sent10: that that the ideal is not microeconomics and it is not a Poa is wrong hold. sent11: that the caldron does not add surpriser and it is not an atrophy is incorrect if the mute adds cymene.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the balbriggan is a nitroglycerin and not a Avestan is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a nitroglycerin and is not a Avestan is incorrect.; sent2 -> int3: the mute adds surpriser if the fact that it is not an atrophy but biotitic is wrong.;
the fact that the fact that the dicumarol is not an incarnation but biotitic does not hold is not incorrect.
sent3 -> int4: the fact that the dicumarol is not a kind of an incarnation but it is biotitic is false if it does not add ideal.; sent9 -> int5: if the mute is not a Poa it adds cymene and is trigonometric.; sent1 & sent10 -> int6: the mute is not a Poa.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the mute does add cymene and is trigonometric.; int7 -> int8: the mute does add cymene.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the caldron does not add surpriser and is not an atrophy does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it does not add surpriser and is not an atrophy does not hold.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the balbriggan is not a Avestan.;
$hypothesis$ = the mute does add surpriser. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the ideal is not microeconomics and not a Poa is incorrect then the mute is not a Poa. sent2: something does add surpriser if that it does not atrophy and is biotitic is not true. sent3: if something does not add ideal that it is not a kind of an incarnation and it is biotitic is incorrect. sent4: that that the mute is not an atrophy but it is biotitic is not wrong is not true if the caldron is not an atrophy. sent5: something does not add ideal. sent6: that the balbriggan is non-Avestan if there exists something such that that that it does not add surpriser and does not atrophy is right is false is not false. sent7: the dicumarol does not add ideal if there is something such that the fact that it is a nitroglycerin and it add ideal is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the balbriggan is a kind of a nitroglycerin and is not Avestan is false if something does not add ideal. sent9: if something is not a Poa then it does add cymene and it is trigonometric. sent10: that that the ideal is not microeconomics and it is not a Poa is wrong hold. sent11: that the caldron does not add surpriser and it is not an atrophy is incorrect if the mute adds cymene. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the balbriggan is a nitroglycerin and not a Avestan is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a nitroglycerin and is not a Avestan is incorrect.; sent2 -> int3: the mute adds surpriser if the fact that it is not an atrophy but biotitic is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__