that the broody is a kind of a constituency but it does not endeavor is not true.
sent1: something is absorbable if the fact that it is not a Anthyllis and not a foreword does not hold. sent2: if that something does not beat tricycle and is not a Sabin is not true then it fudges one-sixteenth. sent3: the urbanization is not a foreword and not a Anthyllis if it does not spot sweatshop. sent4: the esophagoscope is a Anthyllis if the buckram is not a consideration and it is not inconspicuous. sent5: if the urbanization is absorbable then the broody does not spot sweatshop. sent6: that the fact that the urbanization is not a Anthyllis and not a foreword is right is wrong if the esophagoscope is a Anthyllis. sent7: if something does not spot sweatshop then the fact that it is a kind of a constituency that does not endeavor is not right. sent8: everything is not a consideration and not inconspicuous. sent9: if the esophagoscope is not a Anthyllis then the fact that the thermopile does not fudge limit and it is not absorbable does not hold. sent10: if something is a kind of a Scyliorhinidae it is a constituency.
sent8 -> int1: the buckram is not a kind of a consideration and is not inconspicuous.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the esophagoscope is a kind of a Anthyllis.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that the urbanization is not a Anthyllis and is not a kind of a foreword does not hold.; sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the urbanization is not a Anthyllis and is not a foreword is incorrect then it is absorbable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the urbanization is absorbable.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the broody does not spot sweatshop.; sent7 -> int7: if that the broody does not spot sweatshop is not incorrect then that it is a constituency and does not endeavor does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the thermopile does not fudge limit and it is not absorbable is not true.
sent10 -> int8: if the broody is a kind of a Scyliorhinidae then it is a constituency.;
$hypothesis$ = that the broody is a kind of a constituency but it does not endeavor is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is absorbable if the fact that it is not a Anthyllis and not a foreword does not hold. sent2: if that something does not beat tricycle and is not a Sabin is not true then it fudges one-sixteenth. sent3: the urbanization is not a foreword and not a Anthyllis if it does not spot sweatshop. sent4: the esophagoscope is a Anthyllis if the buckram is not a consideration and it is not inconspicuous. sent5: if the urbanization is absorbable then the broody does not spot sweatshop. sent6: that the fact that the urbanization is not a Anthyllis and not a foreword is right is wrong if the esophagoscope is a Anthyllis. sent7: if something does not spot sweatshop then the fact that it is a kind of a constituency that does not endeavor is not right. sent8: everything is not a consideration and not inconspicuous. sent9: if the esophagoscope is not a Anthyllis then the fact that the thermopile does not fudge limit and it is not absorbable does not hold. sent10: if something is a kind of a Scyliorhinidae it is a constituency. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the buckram is not a kind of a consideration and is not inconspicuous.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the esophagoscope is a kind of a Anthyllis.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that the urbanization is not a Anthyllis and is not a kind of a foreword does not hold.; sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the urbanization is not a Anthyllis and is not a foreword is incorrect then it is absorbable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the urbanization is absorbable.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the broody does not spot sweatshop.; sent7 -> int7: if that the broody does not spot sweatshop is not incorrect then that it is a constituency and does not endeavor does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__