that both the BW and the non-eruptiveness occurs is triggered by that the chairmanship occurs.
sent1: that the authorization happens but the spark does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the starting Goodall does not occur is not false. sent2: the dimorphism occurs. sent3: the Calvary happens. sent4: if the photoelectricity does not occur then the Calvary occurs. sent5: if that the authorization but not the sparking occurs is false the rub does not occur. sent6: the decreasing audible happens. sent7: the uppercut occurs. sent8: the eruptiveness is prevented by that the subluxation happens and the chairmanship happens. sent9: the photoelectricity does not occur. sent10: that the uppercut occurs brings about the subluxation. sent11: either the eruptiveness does not occur or the BW happens or both if the Calvary does not occur. sent12: that the Calvary occurs and the BW happens is caused by that the photoelectricity does not occur. sent13: that the pianisticness happens is not wrong. sent14: that the enfeoffing Dewey does not occur is caused by that not the subluxation but the uppercut happens. sent15: that the subluxation does not occur but the uppercut occurs is caused by that the chairmanship does not occur. sent16: the fact that that both the photoelectricity and the particulateness happens is triggered by that the rubbing does not occur hold. sent17: if the upheaving does not occur that both the starting Goodall and the starting Polypodium happens does not hold. sent18: if that the productiveness happens and the limitation occurs is wrong then that the upheaving does not occur is not false. sent19: the starting Goodall does not occur if that the starting Goodall happens and the starting Polypodium happens is wrong.
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: the subluxation happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chairmanship occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the subluxation and the chairmanship happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the eruptiveness does not occur.; sent12 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the Calvary happens and the BW happens is not incorrect.; int4 -> int5: the BW happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: both the BW and the non-eruptiveness occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the enfeoffing Dewey does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that both the BW and the non-eruptiveness occurs is triggered by that the chairmanship occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the authorization happens but the spark does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the starting Goodall does not occur is not false. sent2: the dimorphism occurs. sent3: the Calvary happens. sent4: if the photoelectricity does not occur then the Calvary occurs. sent5: if that the authorization but not the sparking occurs is false the rub does not occur. sent6: the decreasing audible happens. sent7: the uppercut occurs. sent8: the eruptiveness is prevented by that the subluxation happens and the chairmanship happens. sent9: the photoelectricity does not occur. sent10: that the uppercut occurs brings about the subluxation. sent11: either the eruptiveness does not occur or the BW happens or both if the Calvary does not occur. sent12: that the Calvary occurs and the BW happens is caused by that the photoelectricity does not occur. sent13: that the pianisticness happens is not wrong. sent14: that the enfeoffing Dewey does not occur is caused by that not the subluxation but the uppercut happens. sent15: that the subluxation does not occur but the uppercut occurs is caused by that the chairmanship does not occur. sent16: the fact that that both the photoelectricity and the particulateness happens is triggered by that the rubbing does not occur hold. sent17: if the upheaving does not occur that both the starting Goodall and the starting Polypodium happens does not hold. sent18: if that the productiveness happens and the limitation occurs is wrong then that the upheaving does not occur is not false. sent19: the starting Goodall does not occur if that the starting Goodall happens and the starting Polypodium happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: the subluxation happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chairmanship occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the subluxation and the chairmanship happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the eruptiveness does not occur.; sent12 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the Calvary happens and the BW happens is not incorrect.; int4 -> int5: the BW happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: both the BW and the non-eruptiveness occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__