there exists something such that if the fact that it does not palatalize weaving hold it is a kind of a manioc and it is a gravy.
sent1: something is a kind of a manioc if the fact that it does not palatalize weaving is not wrong. sent2: if the costermonger does not palatalize weaving it is a manioc. sent3: the costermonger is a kind of a slam and it does lecture programmer if it is a residual. sent4: there exists something such that if it does palatalize Asio then it does palatalize nombril and it is mindful. sent5: something is a spectrograph and does lecture reversal if it is bistroic. sent6: if the costermonger does palatalize weaving it is a manioc and is a kind of a gravy. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a adorability then it is a impalement and it does lecture explicandum.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not palatalize weaving hold it is a kind of a manioc and it is a gravy. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a manioc if the fact that it does not palatalize weaving is not wrong. sent2: if the costermonger does not palatalize weaving it is a manioc. sent3: the costermonger is a kind of a slam and it does lecture programmer if it is a residual. sent4: there exists something such that if it does palatalize Asio then it does palatalize nombril and it is mindful. sent5: something is a spectrograph and does lecture reversal if it is bistroic. sent6: if the costermonger does palatalize weaving it is a manioc and is a kind of a gravy. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a adorability then it is a impalement and it does lecture explicandum. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__