the witch is fibrocalcific.
sent1: if the manservant is not a Turnix it is not a busker. sent2: if the manservant is not salvific and is not a kind of a comprehensive then the witch is a warm-up. sent3: if something that is a kind of a Iranian does depressurize ESE then the band is inhumane. sent4: the fact that the manservant is a Turnix and it does enter Sabahan is not true. sent5: that something is not salvific and it is not a comprehensive hold if the fact that it is not a busker is right. sent6: if something is Aleutians it is a Iranian. sent7: the witch is a kind of a warm-up if the manservant is salvific but it is not a kind of a comprehensive. sent8: that something dulls and it is Norwegian is not correct if it is not humane. sent9: if that the pancake is not a busker or is not fibrocalcific or both is false the witch is not fibrocalcific. sent10: the Saudi does not enter depopulation if the Sabahan sneaks. sent11: the fact that if something does not enter depopulation that it does depressurize ESE is correct is not false. sent12: the manservant is not salvific. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a liberalism and a demonstrability is not right. sent14: if something is not a kind of a busker then it is not salvific. sent15: if the crampbark is not a kind of a demonstrability the Saudi is Aleutians and/or does depressurize strikeout. sent16: the fact that something does not enter Sabahan but it is a Turnix is not right if it does not dull. sent17: the Sabahan sneaks. sent18: the fact that something is Iranian is not wrong if it depressurizes strikeout. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a liberalism and is a kind of a demonstrability is not correct the crampbark is not a demonstrability. sent20: if that the fact that the manservant is a kind of a Turnix and it enters Sabahan is not true is not false then it is not a busker. sent21: if something is a kind of a warm-up it is fibrocalcific. sent22: if that something dulls and it is a Norwegian is not correct then it is not dulls.
sent5 -> int1: if the manservant is not a kind of a busker then it is non-salvific and is noncomprehensive.; sent20 & sent4 -> int2: the manservant is not a kind of a busker.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the manservant is non-salvific and is not a comprehensive.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the witch is a warm-up.; sent21 -> int5: the witch is fibrocalcific if it is a kind of a warm-up.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the witch is not fibrocalcific.
sent16 -> int6: if the band does not dull then that it does not enter Sabahan and is a kind of a Turnix is wrong.; sent22 -> int7: that the band does not dull if the fact that the band is a kind of dull a Norwegian does not hold is not false.; sent8 -> int8: that the band does dull and it is Norwegian does not hold if it is not humane.; sent13 & sent19 -> int9: the fact that the crampbark is not a demonstrability is right.; sent15 & int9 -> int10: the Saudi either is Aleutians or depressurizes strikeout or both.; sent6 -> int11: that the Saudi is a kind of a Iranian hold if it is Aleutians.; sent18 -> int12: if the Saudi does depressurize strikeout it is Iranian.; int10 & int11 & int12 -> int13: the Saudi is a Iranian.; sent11 -> int14: if the Saudi does not enter depopulation it depressurizes ESE.; sent10 & sent17 -> int15: the fact that the Saudi does not enter depopulation is correct.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the Saudi does depressurize ESE.; int13 & int16 -> int17: the Saudi is a Iranian and does depressurize ESE.; int17 -> int18: something is a kind of a Iranian and depressurizes ESE.; int18 & sent3 -> int19: the fact that the band is not humane is right.; int8 & int19 -> int20: that the band is dulled and Norwegian is not right.; int7 & int20 -> int21: the band does not dull.; int6 & int21 -> int22: the fact that the band does not enter Sabahan and is a kind of a Turnix is false.; int22 -> int23: there is something such that that it does not enter Sabahan and is a kind of a Turnix is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the witch is fibrocalcific. ; $context$ = sent1: if the manservant is not a Turnix it is not a busker. sent2: if the manservant is not salvific and is not a kind of a comprehensive then the witch is a warm-up. sent3: if something that is a kind of a Iranian does depressurize ESE then the band is inhumane. sent4: the fact that the manservant is a Turnix and it does enter Sabahan is not true. sent5: that something is not salvific and it is not a comprehensive hold if the fact that it is not a busker is right. sent6: if something is Aleutians it is a Iranian. sent7: the witch is a kind of a warm-up if the manservant is salvific but it is not a kind of a comprehensive. sent8: that something dulls and it is Norwegian is not correct if it is not humane. sent9: if that the pancake is not a busker or is not fibrocalcific or both is false the witch is not fibrocalcific. sent10: the Saudi does not enter depopulation if the Sabahan sneaks. sent11: the fact that if something does not enter depopulation that it does depressurize ESE is correct is not false. sent12: the manservant is not salvific. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a liberalism and a demonstrability is not right. sent14: if something is not a kind of a busker then it is not salvific. sent15: if the crampbark is not a kind of a demonstrability the Saudi is Aleutians and/or does depressurize strikeout. sent16: the fact that something does not enter Sabahan but it is a Turnix is not right if it does not dull. sent17: the Sabahan sneaks. sent18: the fact that something is Iranian is not wrong if it depressurizes strikeout. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a liberalism and is a kind of a demonstrability is not correct the crampbark is not a demonstrability. sent20: if that the fact that the manservant is a kind of a Turnix and it enters Sabahan is not true is not false then it is not a busker. sent21: if something is a kind of a warm-up it is fibrocalcific. sent22: if that something dulls and it is a Norwegian is not correct then it is not dulls. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the manservant is not a kind of a busker then it is non-salvific and is noncomprehensive.; sent20 & sent4 -> int2: the manservant is not a kind of a busker.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the manservant is non-salvific and is not a comprehensive.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the witch is a warm-up.; sent21 -> int5: the witch is fibrocalcific if it is a kind of a warm-up.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__