the fact that the loquat is not resistless but a hindshank is not correct.
sent1: the loquat is a maker. sent2: if the girasol is elementary and a preschooler then the Napoleon is a revisionist. sent3: the girasol is both not elementary and a preschooler. sent4: the Napoleon is a revisionist if the girasol is not elementary and is a preschooler. sent5: that the mincer is onomastics is not wrong if the fact that the lilyturf is a domestic is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that if there exists something such that that it is a revisionist is true then the Napoleon is not nonspecific hold. sent7: if the fact that something does impair and is resistible does not hold then it is onomastics. sent8: if something is not undomestic it is not a revisionist and it is nonspecific. sent9: the fact that the lilyturf does impair but it is not nonspecific is incorrect if the handle is nonspecific. sent10: if there is something such that it is onomastics then the loquat is not resistless but it is a hindshank. sent11: the mincer is not elementary. sent12: if that something does impair and is not nonspecific is not true then that it is a domestic hold. sent13: if the Napoleon is a revisionist then the fact that the handle is nonspecific is not false. sent14: the loquat is a preschooler. sent15: something is a domestic if that it does not impair is not false.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the Napoleon is a kind of a revisionist.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the handle is nonspecific is right.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the lilyturf does impair but it is not nonspecific is not right.; sent12 -> int4: if that the lilyturf impairs but it is not nonspecific does not hold then that it is a domestic hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the lilyturf is domestic.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the mincer is onomastics.; int6 -> int7: something is onomastics.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the loquat is not resistless and is a hindshank is not right.
sent8 -> int8: the fact that if the handle is the domestic the handle is not a kind of a revisionist but it is not specific is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the loquat is not resistless but a hindshank is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the loquat is a maker. sent2: if the girasol is elementary and a preschooler then the Napoleon is a revisionist. sent3: the girasol is both not elementary and a preschooler. sent4: the Napoleon is a revisionist if the girasol is not elementary and is a preschooler. sent5: that the mincer is onomastics is not wrong if the fact that the lilyturf is a domestic is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that if there exists something such that that it is a revisionist is true then the Napoleon is not nonspecific hold. sent7: if the fact that something does impair and is resistible does not hold then it is onomastics. sent8: if something is not undomestic it is not a revisionist and it is nonspecific. sent9: the fact that the lilyturf does impair but it is not nonspecific is incorrect if the handle is nonspecific. sent10: if there is something such that it is onomastics then the loquat is not resistless but it is a hindshank. sent11: the mincer is not elementary. sent12: if that something does impair and is not nonspecific is not true then that it is a domestic hold. sent13: if the Napoleon is a revisionist then the fact that the handle is nonspecific is not false. sent14: the loquat is a preschooler. sent15: something is a domestic if that it does not impair is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the Napoleon is a kind of a revisionist.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the handle is nonspecific is right.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the lilyturf does impair but it is not nonspecific is not right.; sent12 -> int4: if that the lilyturf impairs but it is not nonspecific does not hold then that it is a domestic hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the lilyturf is domestic.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the mincer is onomastics.; int6 -> int7: something is onomastics.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__