the non-caudalness and/or the magistracy happens.
sent1: the fact that not the treating Eiffel but the riparianness happens is wrong if the arbitrativeness does not occur. sent2: that the X-ray does not occur causes that the caudalness does not occur and/or the magistracy. sent3: that the X-ray does not occur triggers that either the caudalness occurs or the magistracy occurs or both. sent4: that the appearance does not occur and the laparotomy does not occur is incorrect. sent5: if the unsupportiveness does not occur then that both the two-wheelness and the non-antithyroidness happens is not true. sent6: that the fact that the squawking Vincetoxicum but not the steal occurs is not false is not right. sent7: the aping Cuzco does not occur. sent8: if the hemalness does not occur then that the X-ray happens and the treating Eiffel does not occur does not hold. sent9: if the aping Cuzco does not occur the fact that the squawking Vincetoxicum but not the steal happens is incorrect. sent10: the treating Eiffel is prevented by that both the riparianness and the arbitrativeness occurs. sent11: the hemalness does not occur if that the squawking Vincetoxicum does not occur and the steal does not occur is wrong. sent12: the ligating does not occur. sent13: that the riparianness happens is true. sent14: if the squawking Vincetoxicum occurs the hemalness does not occur. sent15: the wrecking occurs but the squawking Vincetoxicum does not occur if the fact that the treating mithramycin does not occur is not wrong. sent16: that the recidivism happens prevents that the treating mithramycin occurs. sent17: if the riparianness does not occur then the fact that the fact that either the non-caudalness or the magistracy or both occurs hold does not hold. sent18: that the steal does not occur is not incorrect if that the steal but not the aping Cuzco occurs does not hold. sent19: that the thuggery happens is prevented by that both the chicane and the disparagement happens. sent20: if the aping Cuzco does not occur that the squawking Vincetoxicum does not occur and the stealing does not occur is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the X-ray occurs is right.; sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the squawking Vincetoxicum does not occur and the stealing does not occur is false.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the hemalness does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the X-ray but not the treating Eiffel happens is not right.;
the fact that the caudalness does not occur or the magistracy happens or both does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the non-caudalness and/or the magistracy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the treating Eiffel but the riparianness happens is wrong if the arbitrativeness does not occur. sent2: that the X-ray does not occur causes that the caudalness does not occur and/or the magistracy. sent3: that the X-ray does not occur triggers that either the caudalness occurs or the magistracy occurs or both. sent4: that the appearance does not occur and the laparotomy does not occur is incorrect. sent5: if the unsupportiveness does not occur then that both the two-wheelness and the non-antithyroidness happens is not true. sent6: that the fact that the squawking Vincetoxicum but not the steal occurs is not false is not right. sent7: the aping Cuzco does not occur. sent8: if the hemalness does not occur then that the X-ray happens and the treating Eiffel does not occur does not hold. sent9: if the aping Cuzco does not occur the fact that the squawking Vincetoxicum but not the steal happens is incorrect. sent10: the treating Eiffel is prevented by that both the riparianness and the arbitrativeness occurs. sent11: the hemalness does not occur if that the squawking Vincetoxicum does not occur and the steal does not occur is wrong. sent12: the ligating does not occur. sent13: that the riparianness happens is true. sent14: if the squawking Vincetoxicum occurs the hemalness does not occur. sent15: the wrecking occurs but the squawking Vincetoxicum does not occur if the fact that the treating mithramycin does not occur is not wrong. sent16: that the recidivism happens prevents that the treating mithramycin occurs. sent17: if the riparianness does not occur then the fact that the fact that either the non-caudalness or the magistracy or both occurs hold does not hold. sent18: that the steal does not occur is not incorrect if that the steal but not the aping Cuzco occurs does not hold. sent19: that the thuggery happens is prevented by that both the chicane and the disparagement happens. sent20: if the aping Cuzco does not occur that the squawking Vincetoxicum does not occur and the stealing does not occur is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the X-ray occurs is right.; sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the squawking Vincetoxicum does not occur and the stealing does not occur is false.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the hemalness does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the X-ray but not the treating Eiffel happens is not right.; __UNKNOWN__