that the dominion does not tyrannize is not incorrect.
sent1: something does not deplore piculet and does not bask Jeroboam. sent2: the fact that the squelch is a Tyrolean is not wrong if something does bask Jeroboam. sent3: if the squelch is a kind of a Tyrolean that the dominion is gastroesophageal is not false. sent4: something is not a digest if the fact that it is a geodesy that is a kind of a speechlessness does not hold. sent5: that the dominion is both a speechlessness and a geodesy is wrong if it does not digest. sent6: something does tyrannize if it is a Tyrolean and it is not gastroesophageal. sent7: if something is gastroesophageal but it is not a fornication the fact that it does not tyrannize hold. sent8: if the squelch is a fornication the dominion is both a Tyrolean and not gastroesophageal. sent9: if something digests the fact that it is not a speechlessness and not a geodesy is not correct. sent10: the dominion is not a fornication if it is not a kind of a speechlessness. sent11: the Cameroonian does not impair Hefa if that the ozonosphere does not impair Hefa and/or it does not bask munj does not hold. sent12: the fact that that the ozonosphere either does not impair Hefa or does not bask munj or both is true is false. sent13: the dominion is not a digest. sent14: if that something is a speechlessness and it is a geodesy is incorrect it is not a kind of a fornication. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it does deplore piculet and it does not bask Jeroboam is false. sent16: there is something such that that it does not deplore piculet and it does bask Jeroboam is not right. sent17: something is not a fornication if that it is not a speechlessness hold. sent18: the squelch is a kind of a Tyrolean if the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does not deplore piculet and does not bask Jeroboam does not hold is right.
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the dominion is a speechlessness and it is a geodesy is not right it is not a fornication.; sent5 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the dominion is a speechlessness and a geodesy is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dominion is not a fornication.; sent7 -> int4: if the dominion is gastroesophageal and is not a fornication then it does not tyrannize.;
the dominion tyrannizes.
sent6 -> int5: the dominion tyrannizes if it is a Tyrolean that is not gastroesophageal.; sent9 -> int6: if the Blimp is a digest the fact that it is not a speechlessness and is not a kind of a geodesy is not correct.; sent11 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that the Cameroonian does not impair Hefa is not incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it does not impair Hefa.;
$hypothesis$ = that the dominion does not tyrannize is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not deplore piculet and does not bask Jeroboam. sent2: the fact that the squelch is a Tyrolean is not wrong if something does bask Jeroboam. sent3: if the squelch is a kind of a Tyrolean that the dominion is gastroesophageal is not false. sent4: something is not a digest if the fact that it is a geodesy that is a kind of a speechlessness does not hold. sent5: that the dominion is both a speechlessness and a geodesy is wrong if it does not digest. sent6: something does tyrannize if it is a Tyrolean and it is not gastroesophageal. sent7: if something is gastroesophageal but it is not a fornication the fact that it does not tyrannize hold. sent8: if the squelch is a fornication the dominion is both a Tyrolean and not gastroesophageal. sent9: if something digests the fact that it is not a speechlessness and not a geodesy is not correct. sent10: the dominion is not a fornication if it is not a kind of a speechlessness. sent11: the Cameroonian does not impair Hefa if that the ozonosphere does not impair Hefa and/or it does not bask munj does not hold. sent12: the fact that that the ozonosphere either does not impair Hefa or does not bask munj or both is true is false. sent13: the dominion is not a digest. sent14: if that something is a speechlessness and it is a geodesy is incorrect it is not a kind of a fornication. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it does deplore piculet and it does not bask Jeroboam is false. sent16: there is something such that that it does not deplore piculet and it does bask Jeroboam is not right. sent17: something is not a fornication if that it is not a speechlessness hold. sent18: the squelch is a kind of a Tyrolean if the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does not deplore piculet and does not bask Jeroboam does not hold is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the dominion is a speechlessness and it is a geodesy is not right it is not a fornication.; sent5 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the dominion is a speechlessness and a geodesy is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dominion is not a fornication.; sent7 -> int4: if the dominion is gastroesophageal and is not a fornication then it does not tyrannize.; __UNKNOWN__