the kohlrabi does not tribulate calcium but it is a shitwork.
sent1: the magician is a kind of a suit. sent2: if the magician is a suit then it is a Slavic. sent3: if the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium then that the kohlrabi does not tribulate calcium but it is a shitwork is not right. sent4: the antibacterial is not accusatorial if that the secretary is a bowler but it is not a single does not hold. sent5: the lugworm does not tribulate calcium. sent6: something does not tribulate calcium but it is circulatory if it is not accusatorial. sent7: if the secretary is a bowler and not a single then the magician is not a kind of a Slavic. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a cavity and it is not a say-so is wrong the magician is a say-so. sent9: if the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium the fact that the kohlrabi tribulate calcium and it is a shitwork is false. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a cavity and not a say-so is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the secretary is a bowler and is not a single.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the magician is not a Slavic.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the magician is a kind of a Slavic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the secretary is a kind of a bowler but it does not single is not right.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the antibacterial is not accusatorial is right.; sent6 -> int6: the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium but it is circulatory if it is not accusatorial.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium but it is circulatory.; int7 -> int8: the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the kohlrabi does not tribulate calcium and is a kind of a shitwork.
sent10 & sent8 -> int9: the magician is a say-so.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a say-so.;
$hypothesis$ = the kohlrabi does not tribulate calcium but it is a shitwork. ; $context$ = sent1: the magician is a kind of a suit. sent2: if the magician is a suit then it is a Slavic. sent3: if the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium then that the kohlrabi does not tribulate calcium but it is a shitwork is not right. sent4: the antibacterial is not accusatorial if that the secretary is a bowler but it is not a single does not hold. sent5: the lugworm does not tribulate calcium. sent6: something does not tribulate calcium but it is circulatory if it is not accusatorial. sent7: if the secretary is a bowler and not a single then the magician is not a kind of a Slavic. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a cavity and it is not a say-so is wrong the magician is a say-so. sent9: if the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium the fact that the kohlrabi tribulate calcium and it is a shitwork is false. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a cavity and not a say-so is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the secretary is a bowler and is not a single.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the magician is not a Slavic.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the magician is a kind of a Slavic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the secretary is a kind of a bowler but it does not single is not right.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the antibacterial is not accusatorial is right.; sent6 -> int6: the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium but it is circulatory if it is not accusatorial.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium but it is circulatory.; int7 -> int8: the antibacterial does not tribulate calcium.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__