if the Papua tinges Cajanus then the cottontail is a crouch.
sent1: the waterway does not crouch. sent2: if the ceramic is not thoughtless then the mudhif is not thoughtless but a footlocker. sent3: the mudhif is both not thoughtless and a crouch if the cottontail is not thoughtless. sent4: the Papua tinges outcrop. sent5: there exists something such that it is not non-capitular. sent6: if the attic does tinge outcrop then the ceramic is unstable. sent7: there exists something such that that it does not tinge Cajanus is false. sent8: if the mudhif is not thoughtless but it is a footlocker the cottontail is a crouch. sent9: the ceramic is not thoughtless if a capitular thing does tinge Cajanus. sent10: the waterway is non-capitular but not diazo. sent11: if something is thoughtless thing that tinges Cajanus it is not unstable. sent12: something is capitular and it does tinge outcrop if it does not tinge Cajanus. sent13: the ceramic is not thoughtless if there is something such that it is both a crouch and a footlocker. sent14: the waterway is not diazo. sent15: if the ceramic is not thoughtless then the mudhif is a footlocker. sent16: the mudhif is a footlocker. sent17: if the attic is unstable then the waterway is not diazo. sent18: if the attic is unstable the waterway does not piffle and is not diazo. sent19: the Papua is capitular if the salicylate tinges outcrop. sent20: that the attic is unstable is not incorrect. sent21: the mudhif is not capitular. sent22: the attic is not unstable but capitular if the Papua is not unstable. sent23: the fact that the salicylate tinges outcrop hold if the waterway does not piffle and is diazo.
sent18 & sent20 -> int1: the waterway does not piffle and is not diazo.;
the ceramic is unstable.
sent12 -> int2: if the attic does not tinge Cajanus it is capitular and it does tinge outcrop.; sent1 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a crouch.;
$hypothesis$ = if the Papua tinges Cajanus then the cottontail is a crouch. ; $context$ = sent1: the waterway does not crouch. sent2: if the ceramic is not thoughtless then the mudhif is not thoughtless but a footlocker. sent3: the mudhif is both not thoughtless and a crouch if the cottontail is not thoughtless. sent4: the Papua tinges outcrop. sent5: there exists something such that it is not non-capitular. sent6: if the attic does tinge outcrop then the ceramic is unstable. sent7: there exists something such that that it does not tinge Cajanus is false. sent8: if the mudhif is not thoughtless but it is a footlocker the cottontail is a crouch. sent9: the ceramic is not thoughtless if a capitular thing does tinge Cajanus. sent10: the waterway is non-capitular but not diazo. sent11: if something is thoughtless thing that tinges Cajanus it is not unstable. sent12: something is capitular and it does tinge outcrop if it does not tinge Cajanus. sent13: the ceramic is not thoughtless if there is something such that it is both a crouch and a footlocker. sent14: the waterway is not diazo. sent15: if the ceramic is not thoughtless then the mudhif is a footlocker. sent16: the mudhif is a footlocker. sent17: if the attic is unstable then the waterway is not diazo. sent18: if the attic is unstable the waterway does not piffle and is not diazo. sent19: the Papua is capitular if the salicylate tinges outcrop. sent20: that the attic is unstable is not incorrect. sent21: the mudhif is not capitular. sent22: the attic is not unstable but capitular if the Papua is not unstable. sent23: the fact that the salicylate tinges outcrop hold if the waterway does not piffle and is diazo. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent20 -> int1: the waterway does not piffle and is not diazo.; __UNKNOWN__