the fact that the radome does not sign Merton is not false.
sent1: if the foreshore is not a wrinkle and it is not a nurse-midwife the pyinma is not a nurse-midwife. sent2: if the logwood is non-coastal it does not totter. sent3: there exists something such that it does lapse. sent4: if the radome is a nurse-midwife it signs Merton. sent5: if the pyinma is not a nurse-midwife the rifampin stages homosexuality and it is a viceroyalty. sent6: the ghetto is not a crock if that the goatherd does not sign Newman and it is not discordant is incorrect. sent7: if the jujube is not a cirque the foreshore does not wrinkle and it is not a nurse-midwife. sent8: that the goatherd does not sign Newman and it is not discordant is incorrect if the logwood does not totter. sent9: if a non-technophobic thing is siliceous then it is not a cirque. sent10: if the word-painter does not company eccentricity the venter is not a eversion. sent11: that something is not a lapsed but it signs Merton is wrong if it stages homosexuality. sent12: if that the radome stages homosexuality but it is not a viceroyalty does not hold it is a nurse-midwife. sent13: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a lapsed that the fact that the radome does stage homosexuality and is not a kind of a viceroyalty is right does not hold. sent14: if the Florentine does company eccentricity and is not a retronym then the fact that the word-painter does not company eccentricity is not wrong. sent15: if the ghetto does not crock the Florentine companies eccentricity and is not a retronym. sent16: the fact that the radome does not sign Merton hold if that the rifampin is not a lapsed but it sign Merton is false.
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: that the radome does stage homosexuality and is not a viceroyalty is not right.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the radome is a nurse-midwife.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the radome does not sign Merton.
sent11 -> int3: that the rifampin is not a lapsed and signs Merton does not hold if it does stage homosexuality.; sent9 -> int4: if the fact that the jujube is non-technophobic thing that is siliceous is true then it is not a cirque.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the radome does not sign Merton is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the foreshore is not a wrinkle and it is not a nurse-midwife the pyinma is not a nurse-midwife. sent2: if the logwood is non-coastal it does not totter. sent3: there exists something such that it does lapse. sent4: if the radome is a nurse-midwife it signs Merton. sent5: if the pyinma is not a nurse-midwife the rifampin stages homosexuality and it is a viceroyalty. sent6: the ghetto is not a crock if that the goatherd does not sign Newman and it is not discordant is incorrect. sent7: if the jujube is not a cirque the foreshore does not wrinkle and it is not a nurse-midwife. sent8: that the goatherd does not sign Newman and it is not discordant is incorrect if the logwood does not totter. sent9: if a non-technophobic thing is siliceous then it is not a cirque. sent10: if the word-painter does not company eccentricity the venter is not a eversion. sent11: that something is not a lapsed but it signs Merton is wrong if it stages homosexuality. sent12: if that the radome stages homosexuality but it is not a viceroyalty does not hold it is a nurse-midwife. sent13: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a lapsed that the fact that the radome does stage homosexuality and is not a kind of a viceroyalty is right does not hold. sent14: if the Florentine does company eccentricity and is not a retronym then the fact that the word-painter does not company eccentricity is not wrong. sent15: if the ghetto does not crock the Florentine companies eccentricity and is not a retronym. sent16: the fact that the radome does not sign Merton hold if that the rifampin is not a lapsed but it sign Merton is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: that the radome does stage homosexuality and is not a viceroyalty is not right.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the radome is a nurse-midwife.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__