the fact that the seductress does not bungle but it is a cilium is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that that it is not a kind of an indaba and does not dogmatize constancy is correct. sent2: if something is an indaba but it does not dogmatize constancy then the ticker is not a cilium. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not an indaba and it does not dogmatize constancy then that the ticker is not a cilium is true. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a cilium. sent5: something does not bungle and is a kind of a cilium if it is not proteolytic. sent6: something that is punctureless and is not a Taricha is not proteolytic. sent7: that the fact that the ticker does bungle and is a cilium does not hold hold if the seductress is not a cilium. sent8: if the ticker is not a cilium that the seductress does not bungle but it is a cilium is not correct.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the ticker is not a kind of a cilium.; int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the seductress does not bungle and is a cilium is true.
sent5 -> int2: if the seductress is not proteolytic then it does not bungle and it is a cilium.; sent6 -> int3: if the seductress is punctureless but it is not a Taricha then it is non-proteolytic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the seductress does not bungle but it is a cilium is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it is not a kind of an indaba and does not dogmatize constancy is correct. sent2: if something is an indaba but it does not dogmatize constancy then the ticker is not a cilium. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not an indaba and it does not dogmatize constancy then that the ticker is not a cilium is true. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a cilium. sent5: something does not bungle and is a kind of a cilium if it is not proteolytic. sent6: something that is punctureless and is not a Taricha is not proteolytic. sent7: that the fact that the ticker does bungle and is a cilium does not hold hold if the seductress is not a cilium. sent8: if the ticker is not a cilium that the seductress does not bungle but it is a cilium is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the ticker is not a kind of a cilium.; int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__