the dancing goshawk happens.
sent1: that the Hollywoodness happens and the sonneting self-education occurs yields that the licking does not occur. sent2: the uncertainness happens. sent3: the spring-cleaning licitness happens but the inactivity does not occur. sent4: the tasting is triggered by either the non-postnuptialness or that the batrachomyomachia happens or both. sent5: if the spring-cleaning licitness occurs and the tasting occurs the dancing goshawk does not occur. sent6: that the dancing goshawk does not occur is prevented by the postnuptialness. sent7: that the pinning does not occur prevents that the uncertainness occurs. sent8: the non-postnuptialness is caused by that the pin occurs but the stored-programness does not occur. sent9: the dancing appointment happens if the spring-cleaning Sambre happens. sent10: the batrachomyomachia does not occur if the fact that the taste does not occur and the batrachomyomachia occurs does not hold. sent11: that both the removing effluent and the Hollywoodness occurs is brought about by the non-ovularness. sent12: if the spring-cleaning licitness does not occur that that the tasting does not occur but the batrachomyomachia happens is not true hold. sent13: the ovularness does not occur if the dancing appointment occurs. sent14: if the toilet does not occur then the fact that not the inactivity but the spring-cleaning licitness happens is not true. sent15: if the lick does not occur the ballup occurs. sent16: the khanate does not occur and the toilet does not occur if the fact that the ballup occurs is right. sent17: the rappeling does not occur. sent18: if the rappeling does not occur then the storminess or the spring-cleaning Sambre or both occurs. sent19: if that the inactivity does not occur but the spring-cleaning licitness occurs does not hold then the spring-cleaning licitness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that both the pinning and the non-stored-programness happens is not true then the uncertainness does not occur. sent21: the postnuptialness triggers that the dancing Leto occurs but the Hell does not occur. sent22: that the spring-cleaning licitness does not occur brings about that not the batrachomyomachia but the tasting happens. sent23: if that that the storminess does not occur is not right is not incorrect the dancing appointment occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pinning and the non-stored-programness occurs is false.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the uncertainness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pin and the non-stored-programness happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the postnuptialness does not occur is not wrong.; int4 -> int5: the postnuptialness does not occur or the batrachomyomachia happens or both.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the taste occurs.; sent3 -> int7: the spring-cleaning licitness occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the spring-cleaning licitness happens and the taste happens.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the dancing goshawk happens.
sent18 & sent17 -> int9: the storminess or the spring-cleaning Sambre or both occurs.; int9 & sent23 & sent9 -> int10: that the dancing appointment does not occur is not right.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the ovularness does not occur.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: both the removing effluent and the Hollywood occurs.; int12 -> int13: the Hollywood occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the dancing goshawk happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Hollywoodness happens and the sonneting self-education occurs yields that the licking does not occur. sent2: the uncertainness happens. sent3: the spring-cleaning licitness happens but the inactivity does not occur. sent4: the tasting is triggered by either the non-postnuptialness or that the batrachomyomachia happens or both. sent5: if the spring-cleaning licitness occurs and the tasting occurs the dancing goshawk does not occur. sent6: that the dancing goshawk does not occur is prevented by the postnuptialness. sent7: that the pinning does not occur prevents that the uncertainness occurs. sent8: the non-postnuptialness is caused by that the pin occurs but the stored-programness does not occur. sent9: the dancing appointment happens if the spring-cleaning Sambre happens. sent10: the batrachomyomachia does not occur if the fact that the taste does not occur and the batrachomyomachia occurs does not hold. sent11: that both the removing effluent and the Hollywoodness occurs is brought about by the non-ovularness. sent12: if the spring-cleaning licitness does not occur that that the tasting does not occur but the batrachomyomachia happens is not true hold. sent13: the ovularness does not occur if the dancing appointment occurs. sent14: if the toilet does not occur then the fact that not the inactivity but the spring-cleaning licitness happens is not true. sent15: if the lick does not occur the ballup occurs. sent16: the khanate does not occur and the toilet does not occur if the fact that the ballup occurs is right. sent17: the rappeling does not occur. sent18: if the rappeling does not occur then the storminess or the spring-cleaning Sambre or both occurs. sent19: if that the inactivity does not occur but the spring-cleaning licitness occurs does not hold then the spring-cleaning licitness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that both the pinning and the non-stored-programness happens is not true then the uncertainness does not occur. sent21: the postnuptialness triggers that the dancing Leto occurs but the Hell does not occur. sent22: that the spring-cleaning licitness does not occur brings about that not the batrachomyomachia but the tasting happens. sent23: if that that the storminess does not occur is not right is not incorrect the dancing appointment occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pinning and the non-stored-programness occurs is false.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the uncertainness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pin and the non-stored-programness happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the postnuptialness does not occur is not wrong.; int4 -> int5: the postnuptialness does not occur or the batrachomyomachia happens or both.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the taste occurs.; sent3 -> int7: the spring-cleaning licitness occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the spring-cleaning licitness happens and the taste happens.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__