the mestiza is not cacodylic.
sent1: that the mestiza is cacodylic thing that is monozygotic is wrong if it is a kind of a schlepper. sent2: The Riksmal rigs Menorah. sent3: the Menorah rigs Riksmal. sent4: that the Menorah is not counterterror is not incorrect if the fact that it does not become hold. sent5: if something is monozygotic and a gendarme then the Menorah becomes. sent6: if something is a kind of a schlepper it becomes. sent7: the Menorah does become. sent8: the saiga is not a kind of a meaningfulness. sent9: the fact that if the mestiza is not cacodylic the fact that the mestiza does not become is correct hold. sent10: something is a meaningfulness but it does not rig Riksmal. sent11: the mestiza is cacodylic if there exists something such that it is a kind of a meaningfulness and it is not a kind of a schlepper. sent12: the dulse is not a schlepper. sent13: the saiga is a kind of a schlepper if the fact that the mestiza is a meaningfulness is true. sent14: if that the saiga does become is not incorrect then the fact that it is a kind of a gendarme and is not monozygotic is not right. sent15: if that the mestiza is not a meaningfulness is not wrong then it is not cacodylic. sent16: the Menorah does not rig Riksmal if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a gendarme and is not monozygotic is false. sent17: that the saiga is cacodylic and is a kind of a gendarme is incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of a schlepper is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mestiza is a kind of a meaningfulness.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the saiga is a schlepper.; sent6 -> int2: if the saiga is a schlepper then it becomes.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the saiga does become.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the saiga is both a gendarme and not monozygotic does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that that it is a gendarme and it is non-monozygotic is true is wrong.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the Menorah does not rig Riksmal.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the mestiza is not a meaningfulness.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the mestiza is cacodylic.
$hypothesis$ = the mestiza is not cacodylic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mestiza is cacodylic thing that is monozygotic is wrong if it is a kind of a schlepper. sent2: The Riksmal rigs Menorah. sent3: the Menorah rigs Riksmal. sent4: that the Menorah is not counterterror is not incorrect if the fact that it does not become hold. sent5: if something is monozygotic and a gendarme then the Menorah becomes. sent6: if something is a kind of a schlepper it becomes. sent7: the Menorah does become. sent8: the saiga is not a kind of a meaningfulness. sent9: the fact that if the mestiza is not cacodylic the fact that the mestiza does not become is correct hold. sent10: something is a meaningfulness but it does not rig Riksmal. sent11: the mestiza is cacodylic if there exists something such that it is a kind of a meaningfulness and it is not a kind of a schlepper. sent12: the dulse is not a schlepper. sent13: the saiga is a kind of a schlepper if the fact that the mestiza is a meaningfulness is true. sent14: if that the saiga does become is not incorrect then the fact that it is a kind of a gendarme and is not monozygotic is not right. sent15: if that the mestiza is not a meaningfulness is not wrong then it is not cacodylic. sent16: the Menorah does not rig Riksmal if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a gendarme and is not monozygotic is false. sent17: that the saiga is cacodylic and is a kind of a gendarme is incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of a schlepper is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mestiza is a kind of a meaningfulness.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the saiga is a schlepper.; sent6 -> int2: if the saiga is a schlepper then it becomes.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the saiga does become.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the saiga is both a gendarme and not monozygotic does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that that it is a gendarme and it is non-monozygotic is true is wrong.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the Menorah does not rig Riksmal.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the mestiza is not a meaningfulness.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__