that there is something such that if it is calisthenic it is not a soutache and it is not a sard is incorrect.
sent1: The ology does not subrogate frogbit. sent2: that the frogbit is not lawful is not incorrect if the Ostyak is lawful and it is osteal. sent3: the frogbit does not subrogate ology. sent4: the millionairess is not an abuse. sent5: if the frogbit subrogates ology that the coelostat is a sard but it is not a soutache is incorrect. sent6: if the millionairess is not an abuse and it is not unrighteous the grid subrogates epsilon. sent7: if the grid does subrogate epsilon then the Ostyak is unrenewable. sent8: that the millionairess is not unrighteous is not false. sent9: something that is unrenewable is lawful. sent10: the frogbit is not a sard if it does not subrogate ology. sent11: if the fact that the frogbit is a kind of a soutache is right it is not calisthenic. sent12: if something is not lawful then it subrogates ology and does lysogenize moo. sent13: if that the fact that something is a kind of a sard and is not a soutache is not incorrect is incorrect then it is calisthenic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frogbit is a soutache.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the frogbit is not calisthenic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the frogbit is calisthenic.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the frogbit is not a soutache.; sent10 & sent3 -> int4: the frogbit is not a sard.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the frogbit is not a soutache and is not a sard.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the frogbit is not a kind of a soutache and is not a sard if it is calisthenic.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the coelostat is calisthenic.
sent13 -> int7: if that the coelostat is a sard and is not a soutache does not hold then it is calisthenic.; sent12 -> int8: if the frogbit is not lawful then it subrogates ology and lysogenizes moo.; sent9 -> int9: if the Ostyak is unrenewable then it is lawful.; sent4 & sent8 -> int10: the millionairess is not a kind of an abuse and is not unrighteous.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the grid subrogates epsilon.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the Ostyak is unrenewable.; int9 & int12 -> int13: the Ostyak is lawful.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is calisthenic it is not a soutache and it is not a sard is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: The ology does not subrogate frogbit. sent2: that the frogbit is not lawful is not incorrect if the Ostyak is lawful and it is osteal. sent3: the frogbit does not subrogate ology. sent4: the millionairess is not an abuse. sent5: if the frogbit subrogates ology that the coelostat is a sard but it is not a soutache is incorrect. sent6: if the millionairess is not an abuse and it is not unrighteous the grid subrogates epsilon. sent7: if the grid does subrogate epsilon then the Ostyak is unrenewable. sent8: that the millionairess is not unrighteous is not false. sent9: something that is unrenewable is lawful. sent10: the frogbit is not a sard if it does not subrogate ology. sent11: if the fact that the frogbit is a kind of a soutache is right it is not calisthenic. sent12: if something is not lawful then it subrogates ology and does lysogenize moo. sent13: if that the fact that something is a kind of a sard and is not a soutache is not incorrect is incorrect then it is calisthenic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frogbit is a soutache.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the frogbit is not calisthenic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the frogbit is calisthenic.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the frogbit is not a soutache.; sent10 & sent3 -> int4: the frogbit is not a sard.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the frogbit is not a soutache and is not a sard.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the frogbit is not a kind of a soutache and is not a sard if it is calisthenic.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__