the alumroot does not blue armchair and is not a monsoon.
sent1: that the oxbow does not interpret is not incorrect if something that does bear does cathect spokesperson. sent2: the waker is non-salient or non-dramaturgic or both. sent3: that the haze does not philander Raffia hold if the waker is not a Formicidae. sent4: the knish is not powerless and does not cathect spokesperson if the haze does not cathect spokesperson. sent5: there exists something such that it cathects spokesperson and it is a kind of a salient. sent6: the fact that if something is not a salient it does not philander Raffia is not wrong. sent7: something is not a kind of a monsoon if it does not interpret. sent8: the haze does not philander Raffia if the waker is not a kind of a salient. sent9: the alumroot is not dramaturgic and not a monsoon. sent10: the haze philanders Raffia and is powerless. sent11: if the knish is not a kind of a salient the waker is not a born. sent12: the factory is dramaturgic. sent13: the oxbow is not a born. sent14: if the waker is a kind of a monsoon it does not cathect spokesperson or it does not interpret or both. sent15: there exists something such that it does flock motherwort. sent16: if the oxbow is not a monsoon the alumroot does not blue armchair and it is not a kind of a monsoon. sent17: if something is not a Formicidae then it does not philander Raffia. sent18: if the factory is dramaturgic the fact that the fact that the knish does not cathect spokesperson is incorrect hold. sent19: something is a monsoon if it is a salient. sent20: the waker does cathect spokesperson if the knish is not a Formicidae. sent21: the alumroot is a kind of a Formicidae. sent22: the waker is a monsoon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waker is not a kind of a salient or it is not a Formicidae or both.; assump1 & sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the haze does not philander Raffia.; sent10 -> int2: the haze does philander Raffia.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the waker is either not salient or not a Formicidae or both does not hold is right.; sent18 & sent12 -> int5: the knish does cathect spokesperson.; sent7 -> int6: the oxbow is not a kind of a monsoon if it does not interpret.;
the picnicker does not philander Raffia.
sent6 -> int7: the picnicker does not philander Raffia if it is not a kind of a salient.; sent14 & sent22 -> int8: the waker does not cathect spokesperson and/or does not interpret.;
$hypothesis$ = the alumroot does not blue armchair and is not a monsoon. ; $context$ = sent1: that the oxbow does not interpret is not incorrect if something that does bear does cathect spokesperson. sent2: the waker is non-salient or non-dramaturgic or both. sent3: that the haze does not philander Raffia hold if the waker is not a Formicidae. sent4: the knish is not powerless and does not cathect spokesperson if the haze does not cathect spokesperson. sent5: there exists something such that it cathects spokesperson and it is a kind of a salient. sent6: the fact that if something is not a salient it does not philander Raffia is not wrong. sent7: something is not a kind of a monsoon if it does not interpret. sent8: the haze does not philander Raffia if the waker is not a kind of a salient. sent9: the alumroot is not dramaturgic and not a monsoon. sent10: the haze philanders Raffia and is powerless. sent11: if the knish is not a kind of a salient the waker is not a born. sent12: the factory is dramaturgic. sent13: the oxbow is not a born. sent14: if the waker is a kind of a monsoon it does not cathect spokesperson or it does not interpret or both. sent15: there exists something such that it does flock motherwort. sent16: if the oxbow is not a monsoon the alumroot does not blue armchair and it is not a kind of a monsoon. sent17: if something is not a Formicidae then it does not philander Raffia. sent18: if the factory is dramaturgic the fact that the fact that the knish does not cathect spokesperson is incorrect hold. sent19: something is a monsoon if it is a salient. sent20: the waker does cathect spokesperson if the knish is not a Formicidae. sent21: the alumroot is a kind of a Formicidae. sent22: the waker is a monsoon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waker is not a kind of a salient or it is not a Formicidae or both.; assump1 & sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the haze does not philander Raffia.; sent10 -> int2: the haze does philander Raffia.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the waker is either not salient or not a Formicidae or both does not hold is right.; sent18 & sent12 -> int5: the knish does cathect spokesperson.; sent7 -> int6: the oxbow is not a kind of a monsoon if it does not interpret.; __UNKNOWN__