either the loofah is manorial or it does marvel loveseat or both.
sent1: the linchpin is accommodational. sent2: if the squelch is accommodational thing that is not a tapeworm the loofah is a tapeworm. sent3: the squelch is accommodational but it is not a tapeworm. sent4: if there exists something such that it is glacial then the jack-o-lantern is manorial. sent5: the jack-o-lantern is manorial. sent6: the squelch is not a tapeworm. sent7: the fact that the jack-o-lantern is glacial and it is passable is wrong. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not absolve is false then the linchpin is passable. sent9: the squelch is glacial or it is accommodational or both. sent10: the fact that the loofah is glacial is right. sent11: the Lee does marvel loveseat. sent12: if the loofah does not absolve and is a tapeworm then it is not non-manorial. sent13: the fact that if the fact that the jack-o-lantern is a kind of non-glacial thing that is passable is wrong then the linchpin is not passable is right. sent14: that the loofah is a stenography is right. sent15: that that the jack-o-lantern is a kind of non-glacial thing that is passable is correct is not true. sent16: the loofah is a kind of a tapeworm if the squelch is accommodational thing that is a kind of a tapeworm. sent17: the jack-o-lantern does not absolve if the fact that the loofah is not glacial but it absolve is not true. sent18: the loofah is not passable. sent19: if the jack-o-lantern is glacial then the linchpin is not passable. sent20: the jack-o-lantern does not marvel loveseat.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the loofah does absolve hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does absolve is not false.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the linchpin is passable is true.; sent13 & sent15 -> int3: the linchpin is not passable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the loofah does not absolve.; sent2 & sent3 -> int6: the loofah is a tapeworm.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the loofah does not absolve and is a tapeworm.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the loofah is manorial.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the vessel is not glacial and respects linchpin.
$hypothesis$ = either the loofah is manorial or it does marvel loveseat or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the linchpin is accommodational. sent2: if the squelch is accommodational thing that is not a tapeworm the loofah is a tapeworm. sent3: the squelch is accommodational but it is not a tapeworm. sent4: if there exists something such that it is glacial then the jack-o-lantern is manorial. sent5: the jack-o-lantern is manorial. sent6: the squelch is not a tapeworm. sent7: the fact that the jack-o-lantern is glacial and it is passable is wrong. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not absolve is false then the linchpin is passable. sent9: the squelch is glacial or it is accommodational or both. sent10: the fact that the loofah is glacial is right. sent11: the Lee does marvel loveseat. sent12: if the loofah does not absolve and is a tapeworm then it is not non-manorial. sent13: the fact that if the fact that the jack-o-lantern is a kind of non-glacial thing that is passable is wrong then the linchpin is not passable is right. sent14: that the loofah is a stenography is right. sent15: that that the jack-o-lantern is a kind of non-glacial thing that is passable is correct is not true. sent16: the loofah is a kind of a tapeworm if the squelch is accommodational thing that is a kind of a tapeworm. sent17: the jack-o-lantern does not absolve if the fact that the loofah is not glacial but it absolve is not true. sent18: the loofah is not passable. sent19: if the jack-o-lantern is glacial then the linchpin is not passable. sent20: the jack-o-lantern does not marvel loveseat. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the loofah does absolve hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does absolve is not false.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the linchpin is passable is true.; sent13 & sent15 -> int3: the linchpin is not passable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the loofah does not absolve.; sent2 & sent3 -> int6: the loofah is a tapeworm.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the loofah does not absolve and is a tapeworm.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the loofah is manorial.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__