that the sneering refusal does not occur and the electromechanicalness does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the short-orderness does not occur if the external happens. sent2: the sneering housework happens. sent3: that the fact that the sneering refusal and the non-canonicness occurs is not true if the electromechanicalness occurs is true. sent4: if that the consumption but not the sneering spandrel happens is not true the externalness happens. sent5: both the sneering housework and the consumption happens. sent6: if the sneering spandrel does not occur then the clinking dint does not occur. sent7: if the external occurs and/or the sneering spandrel happens the consumption does not occur. sent8: the canonicness does not occur if the clinking dint does not occur. sent9: the pecking does not occur. sent10: the fact that the sneering refusal does not occur and the electromechanicalness does not occur is incorrect if the canonicness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the sneering refusal does not occur but the electromechanicalness occurs is false. sent12: the sneering sanitariness happens and/or the Marks happens. sent13: the fact that the sneering refusal does not occur but the electromechanicalness happens is not true if the canonicness does not occur. sent14: that both the external and the non-canonicness occurs does not hold if the sneering housework does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the sneering spandrel happens hold.; assump1 -> int1: either the externalness or the sneering spandrel or both occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the consumption does not occur hold.; sent5 -> int3: the consumption occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sneering spandrel does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the clinking dint does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the canonicness does not occur.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the short-orderness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the sneering refusal does not occur and the electromechanicalness does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the short-orderness does not occur if the external happens. sent2: the sneering housework happens. sent3: that the fact that the sneering refusal and the non-canonicness occurs is not true if the electromechanicalness occurs is true. sent4: if that the consumption but not the sneering spandrel happens is not true the externalness happens. sent5: both the sneering housework and the consumption happens. sent6: if the sneering spandrel does not occur then the clinking dint does not occur. sent7: if the external occurs and/or the sneering spandrel happens the consumption does not occur. sent8: the canonicness does not occur if the clinking dint does not occur. sent9: the pecking does not occur. sent10: the fact that the sneering refusal does not occur and the electromechanicalness does not occur is incorrect if the canonicness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the sneering refusal does not occur but the electromechanicalness occurs is false. sent12: the sneering sanitariness happens and/or the Marks happens. sent13: the fact that the sneering refusal does not occur but the electromechanicalness happens is not true if the canonicness does not occur. sent14: that both the external and the non-canonicness occurs does not hold if the sneering housework does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the sneering spandrel happens hold.; assump1 -> int1: either the externalness or the sneering spandrel or both occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the consumption does not occur hold.; sent5 -> int3: the consumption occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sneering spandrel does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the clinking dint does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the canonicness does not occur.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__