that both the non-jurisprudentialness and the folly occurs is wrong if the mooching selflessness does not occur.
sent1: the folly occurs. sent2: the lawsuit does not occur and the Guyaneseness does not occur if that the oligarchicness occurs is right. sent3: the fact that the jurisprudentialness occurs and the folly occurs is not correct. sent4: the jurisprudentialness does not occur. sent5: if the mooching selflessness does not occur then the jurisprudentialness does not occur and the folly occurs. sent6: if the glint occurs that the adapting stonecress does not occur is not wrong. sent7: if the jurisprudentialness occurs and the folly occurs then the mooching selflessness occurs. sent8: that the higherness occurs and the reorienting qepiq does not occur prevents that the glint does not occur. sent9: that the Guyaneseness does not occur brings about that the higherness happens but the reorienting qepiq does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the mooching selflessness does not occur hold the fact that the jurisprudentialness occurs and the folly happens is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the jurisprudentialness but the folly occurs.;
the adapting stonecress does not occur and the bust happens.
$hypothesis$ = that both the non-jurisprudentialness and the folly occurs is wrong if the mooching selflessness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the folly occurs. sent2: the lawsuit does not occur and the Guyaneseness does not occur if that the oligarchicness occurs is right. sent3: the fact that the jurisprudentialness occurs and the folly occurs is not correct. sent4: the jurisprudentialness does not occur. sent5: if the mooching selflessness does not occur then the jurisprudentialness does not occur and the folly occurs. sent6: if the glint occurs that the adapting stonecress does not occur is not wrong. sent7: if the jurisprudentialness occurs and the folly occurs then the mooching selflessness occurs. sent8: that the higherness occurs and the reorienting qepiq does not occur prevents that the glint does not occur. sent9: that the Guyaneseness does not occur brings about that the higherness happens but the reorienting qepiq does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the mooching selflessness does not occur hold the fact that the jurisprudentialness occurs and the folly happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the jurisprudentialness but the folly occurs.; __UNKNOWN__