the copywriter is not a kind of a damned and it is non-stale.
sent1: if the hemming-stitch does stale then the chrysomelid does not correlate assignor and it is not stale. sent2: the copywriter is non-stale. sent3: if the hemming-stitch correlates assignor then the chrysomelid stales. sent4: if that the Wampanoag is entrepreneurial but it does not single palpitation does not hold the chrysomelid is not entrepreneurial. sent5: the chrysomelid is a Bolshevik. sent6: something is a chlordiazepoxide but not a damned if the fact that it does prank is true. sent7: the chrysomelid is not sulphuric and it is not terpsichorean. sent8: the copywriter does not correlate assignor if the hemming-stitch does not correlate assignor or does prank or both. sent9: the fact that the copywriter does not stale if the chrysomelid is stale is right. sent10: if something is a kind of a chlordiazepoxide but it is not a kind of a damned that it does correlate assignor is not wrong. sent11: the chrysomelid does prank and is a chlordiazepoxide if it is not entrepreneurial. sent12: that something is not a damned and not stale is not correct if it does not correlate assignor. sent13: the Philistine stales. sent14: if the copywriter does stale the chrysomelid is not a damned and is not stale. sent15: the copywriter is a kind of non-stale thing that is not a damned if the chrysomelid is a damned. sent16: the fact that the hemming-stitch does correlate assignor is not incorrect. sent17: if the copywriter is stale then the chrysomelid is a kind of a damned. sent18: the copywriter is not a damned and not stale if the chrysomelid stale. sent19: The fact that the assignor does correlate hemming-stitch is not incorrect.
sent3 & sent16 -> int1: the chrysomelid stales.; int1 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the berth is not a decision and does not stale.
sent6 -> int2: the hemming-stitch is a chlordiazepoxide and is not a kind of a damned if it pranks.; sent10 -> int3: that if the berth is a kind of a chlordiazepoxide and is not the damned the berth correlates assignor is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the copywriter is not a kind of a damned and it is non-stale. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hemming-stitch does stale then the chrysomelid does not correlate assignor and it is not stale. sent2: the copywriter is non-stale. sent3: if the hemming-stitch correlates assignor then the chrysomelid stales. sent4: if that the Wampanoag is entrepreneurial but it does not single palpitation does not hold the chrysomelid is not entrepreneurial. sent5: the chrysomelid is a Bolshevik. sent6: something is a chlordiazepoxide but not a damned if the fact that it does prank is true. sent7: the chrysomelid is not sulphuric and it is not terpsichorean. sent8: the copywriter does not correlate assignor if the hemming-stitch does not correlate assignor or does prank or both. sent9: the fact that the copywriter does not stale if the chrysomelid is stale is right. sent10: if something is a kind of a chlordiazepoxide but it is not a kind of a damned that it does correlate assignor is not wrong. sent11: the chrysomelid does prank and is a chlordiazepoxide if it is not entrepreneurial. sent12: that something is not a damned and not stale is not correct if it does not correlate assignor. sent13: the Philistine stales. sent14: if the copywriter does stale the chrysomelid is not a damned and is not stale. sent15: the copywriter is a kind of non-stale thing that is not a damned if the chrysomelid is a damned. sent16: the fact that the hemming-stitch does correlate assignor is not incorrect. sent17: if the copywriter is stale then the chrysomelid is a kind of a damned. sent18: the copywriter is not a damned and not stale if the chrysomelid stale. sent19: The fact that the assignor does correlate hemming-stitch is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent16 -> int1: the chrysomelid stales.; int1 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__