that the skylight does mellow potoroo is not false.
sent1: if the skylight is a kind of inconspicuous thing that is cataclinal then it is a kind of an outside. sent2: something is unbroken if the fact that it is a ingratiation is true. sent3: the fact that that the tabor does slate and it is Leibnizian is true is not true. sent4: that the skylight is a kind of a ingratiation hold. sent5: the skylight does not mellow potoroo and it is not a weeds if it is not calcific. sent6: something is not conspicuous if it does not synthesize farthingale. sent7: the skylight does not synthesize farthingale if there exists something such that the fact that it does not slate and it is Leibnizian is false. sent8: something is both not conspicuous and cataclinal if it does not synthesize farthingale. sent9: if the skylight is an outside and it is unbroken it is not calcific. sent10: if the scallion does not synthesize farthingale the fact that it is cataclinal and it is not deaf does not hold. sent11: that the tabor is not a slate but Leibnizian is not correct.
sent11 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a slate and it is Leibnizian is false.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the skylight does not synthesize farthingale.; sent8 -> int3: if the skylight does not synthesize farthingale it is not conspicuous and it is cataclinal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the skylight is not conspicuous and is not non-cataclinal.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the skylight is a kind of an outside.; sent2 -> int6: the skylight is unbroken if the fact that it is a ingratiation is correct.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the skylight is unbroken.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the skylight is an outside and is unbroken.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the skylight is not calcific.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the skylight does not mellow potoroo and is not a weeds.; int10 -> hypothesis;
that the plastic is not a deaf but it is a kind of a Ariocarpus is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the skylight does mellow potoroo is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the skylight is a kind of inconspicuous thing that is cataclinal then it is a kind of an outside. sent2: something is unbroken if the fact that it is a ingratiation is true. sent3: the fact that that the tabor does slate and it is Leibnizian is true is not true. sent4: that the skylight is a kind of a ingratiation hold. sent5: the skylight does not mellow potoroo and it is not a weeds if it is not calcific. sent6: something is not conspicuous if it does not synthesize farthingale. sent7: the skylight does not synthesize farthingale if there exists something such that the fact that it does not slate and it is Leibnizian is false. sent8: something is both not conspicuous and cataclinal if it does not synthesize farthingale. sent9: if the skylight is an outside and it is unbroken it is not calcific. sent10: if the scallion does not synthesize farthingale the fact that it is cataclinal and it is not deaf does not hold. sent11: that the tabor is not a slate but Leibnizian is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a slate and it is Leibnizian is false.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the skylight does not synthesize farthingale.; sent8 -> int3: if the skylight does not synthesize farthingale it is not conspicuous and it is cataclinal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the skylight is not conspicuous and is not non-cataclinal.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the skylight is a kind of an outside.; sent2 -> int6: the skylight is unbroken if the fact that it is a ingratiation is correct.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the skylight is unbroken.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the skylight is an outside and is unbroken.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the skylight is not calcific.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the skylight does not mellow potoroo and is not a weeds.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__