there is something such that if it is not non-icterogenic that it is not unrenewable or it is a gridiron or both is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is icterogenic then it is unrenewable. sent2: the fact that either the epiphyllum is not unrenewable or it is a gridiron or both is wrong if it is icterogenic. sent3: there is something such that if it disembowels locative it does not yield meliorism. sent4: there exists something such that if it is icterogenic that it is unrenewable or it is a gridiron or both is incorrect. sent5: the fact that something is not a solicitorship and/or does dissimulate does not hold if it is icterogenic. sent6: the epiphyllum is not a gridiron if it is icterogenic. sent7: the fact that the epiphyllum is unrenewable and/or is a gridiron is not correct if it is icterogenic.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the chinaware is not a solicitorship or does dissimulate or both is not right if it is icterogenic.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not non-icterogenic that it is not unrenewable or it is a gridiron or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is icterogenic then it is unrenewable. sent2: the fact that either the epiphyllum is not unrenewable or it is a gridiron or both is wrong if it is icterogenic. sent3: there is something such that if it disembowels locative it does not yield meliorism. sent4: there exists something such that if it is icterogenic that it is unrenewable or it is a gridiron or both is incorrect. sent5: the fact that something is not a solicitorship and/or does dissimulate does not hold if it is icterogenic. sent6: the epiphyllum is not a gridiron if it is icterogenic. sent7: the fact that the epiphyllum is unrenewable and/or is a gridiron is not correct if it is icterogenic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__