that the molybdenite is a douche and does not hook retention is wrong.
sent1: if the candelabrum is not a campsite and it is not philanthropic then the molybdenite is not a campsite. sent2: something that does not cloud affiant and clouds aspect is philanthropic. sent3: if the countinghouse is a cable then the candelabrum is both not a campsite and not philanthropic. sent4: if the molybdenite does not cloud affiant and is a kind of a campsite it does inflate bastinado. sent5: if a non-virginal thing is a demander then it is not a dripstone. sent6: the molybdenite is a campsite if that the kelpie does not cloud affiant and clouds aspect is not true. sent7: if the fact that the candelabrum is not a dripstone and not non-philanthropic is not correct then the kelpie is not non-philanthropic. sent8: the countinghouse does not cable and does not inflate bastinado. sent9: something does cloud aspect if it does inflate bastinado. sent10: if the kieserite samples noiselessness then the coop is not a virginal and is a demander. sent11: if something is not a dripstone then it is not a cable and it does inflate bastinado. sent12: if something is a campsite then it is a douche. sent13: if the countinghouse is not a cable and it does not inflate bastinado then the molybdenite does not hook retention. sent14: the fact that the candelabrum is a dripstone and it is philanthropic is not true. sent15: if the coop is not a cable but it does inflate bastinado the countinghouse is a cable. sent16: the fact that the candelabrum is not a dripstone but philanthropic is incorrect. sent17: if something is not a campsite then that it is a kind of a douche that does not hook retention is incorrect.
sent2 -> int1: the kelpie is philanthropic if it does not cloud affiant and it does cloud aspect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kelpie does not cloud affiant but it does cloud aspect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the kelpie is philanthropic.; sent7 & sent16 -> int3: the kelpie is not philanthropic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the kelpie does not cloud affiant but it clouds aspect is wrong.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the molybdenite is a campsite.; sent12 -> int7: if the molybdenite is a campsite it does douche.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the molybdenite is a douche.; sent13 & sent8 -> int9: the molybdenite does not hook retention.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the molybdenite douches but it does not hook retention is not correct.
sent17 -> int10: that the molybdenite douches but it does not hook retention does not hold if it is not a kind of a campsite.; sent11 -> int11: that the coop is not a kind of the cable and inflates bastinado if the coop is not a dripstone is true.; sent5 -> int12: the coop is not a dripstone if it is not a virginal and it is a demander.;
$hypothesis$ = that the molybdenite is a douche and does not hook retention is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the candelabrum is not a campsite and it is not philanthropic then the molybdenite is not a campsite. sent2: something that does not cloud affiant and clouds aspect is philanthropic. sent3: if the countinghouse is a cable then the candelabrum is both not a campsite and not philanthropic. sent4: if the molybdenite does not cloud affiant and is a kind of a campsite it does inflate bastinado. sent5: if a non-virginal thing is a demander then it is not a dripstone. sent6: the molybdenite is a campsite if that the kelpie does not cloud affiant and clouds aspect is not true. sent7: if the fact that the candelabrum is not a dripstone and not non-philanthropic is not correct then the kelpie is not non-philanthropic. sent8: the countinghouse does not cable and does not inflate bastinado. sent9: something does cloud aspect if it does inflate bastinado. sent10: if the kieserite samples noiselessness then the coop is not a virginal and is a demander. sent11: if something is not a dripstone then it is not a cable and it does inflate bastinado. sent12: if something is a campsite then it is a douche. sent13: if the countinghouse is not a cable and it does not inflate bastinado then the molybdenite does not hook retention. sent14: the fact that the candelabrum is a dripstone and it is philanthropic is not true. sent15: if the coop is not a cable but it does inflate bastinado the countinghouse is a cable. sent16: the fact that the candelabrum is not a dripstone but philanthropic is incorrect. sent17: if something is not a campsite then that it is a kind of a douche that does not hook retention is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the kelpie is philanthropic if it does not cloud affiant and it does cloud aspect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kelpie does not cloud affiant but it does cloud aspect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the kelpie is philanthropic.; sent7 & sent16 -> int3: the kelpie is not philanthropic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the kelpie does not cloud affiant but it clouds aspect is wrong.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the molybdenite is a campsite.; sent12 -> int7: if the molybdenite is a campsite it does douche.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the molybdenite is a douche.; sent13 & sent8 -> int9: the molybdenite does not hook retention.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__