the soundboard is a kind of virtuous thing that uplifts Springfield.
sent1: the Caterpillar effuses and it is transcultural. sent2: that the Caterpillar does uplift Springfield is not incorrect if something is biogenic. sent3: the soundboard does uplift Springfield if there exists something such that that that it is not biogenic and does interfere soundboard hold does not hold. sent4: the fact that the Caterpillar does not interfere soundboard is not false if it does uplift Springfield and is biogenic. sent5: the soundboard is virtuous. sent6: the Caterpillar is a kind of non-virtuous thing that is transcultural. sent7: the Caterpillar does not effuse if that it is non-biogenic and interferes soundboard is right. sent8: there exists something such that that it is biogenic and it interferes soundboard is not right. sent9: the soundboard is a past that is hematopoietic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Caterpillar is not biogenic but it interferes soundboard.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Caterpillar does not effuse.; sent1 -> int2: the Caterpillar effuses.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Caterpillar is a kind of non-biogenic thing that does interfere soundboard is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is non-biogenic and it interferes soundboard does not hold.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the soundboard uplifts Springfield.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the soundboard is a kind of virtuous thing that uplifts Springfield. ; $context$ = sent1: the Caterpillar effuses and it is transcultural. sent2: that the Caterpillar does uplift Springfield is not incorrect if something is biogenic. sent3: the soundboard does uplift Springfield if there exists something such that that that it is not biogenic and does interfere soundboard hold does not hold. sent4: the fact that the Caterpillar does not interfere soundboard is not false if it does uplift Springfield and is biogenic. sent5: the soundboard is virtuous. sent6: the Caterpillar is a kind of non-virtuous thing that is transcultural. sent7: the Caterpillar does not effuse if that it is non-biogenic and interferes soundboard is right. sent8: there exists something such that that it is biogenic and it interferes soundboard is not right. sent9: the soundboard is a past that is hematopoietic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Caterpillar is not biogenic but it interferes soundboard.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Caterpillar does not effuse.; sent1 -> int2: the Caterpillar effuses.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Caterpillar is a kind of non-biogenic thing that does interfere soundboard is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is non-biogenic and it interferes soundboard does not hold.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the soundboard uplifts Springfield.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__