the primus is not a referent.
sent1: the annulet is not a Sax if there is something such that it does unionize tractability or it is aroid or both. sent2: the broadcasting is not architectural if there exists something such that it does not unionize tractability. sent3: the fact that the primus is not architectural but algolagnic is wrong. sent4: that something is not a kind of an equivocation but it is a kind of a Sax is not true if it is algolagnic. sent5: the fact that the sandboy is non-architectural but not aroid is incorrect. sent6: the primus is an equivocation if the fact that it is non-architectural thing that is not algolagnic does not hold. sent7: if there exists something such that it is aroid then the annulet is not a Sax. sent8: if something is an equivocation then it is a referent. sent9: The tractability does unionize sandboy. sent10: that the primus is both not architectural and not algolagnic does not hold if the annulet is not a kind of a Sax. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not archival but Hippocratic is not right. sent12: if the fact that the sandboy does not unionize tractability and is not aroid does not hold it is a referent. sent13: that the sandboy is a Sax is not false if the fact that the annulet is not an equivocation and is a Sax is not true. sent14: the sandboy does unionize tractability. sent15: if something is a Sax that is aroid then it does not unionize tractability. sent16: if there exists something such that it does not sneer Bellow that the sandboy is not a kind of a Baptists is right. sent17: if something is both not an influenza and a cymbalist then it is not a referent. sent18: the primus does not sneer Bellow. sent19: the fact that the annulet is not a kind of an influenza but it is a cymbalist is right. sent20: the fact that the sandboy does not bloat and it is not aciculate does not hold. sent21: that the primus is architectural but it is not algolagnic is not true. sent22: something that is both not a Baptists and archival is aroid. sent23: if the annulet is not a Sax then that the primus is architectural thing that is not algolagnic is wrong. sent24: the sandboy is lobeliaceous. sent25: something is not a referent if it does not unionize tractability. sent26: if the annulet is not a Sax then the fact that the fact that the primus is not architectural but it is algolagnic is not right is right.
sent14 -> int1: the sandboy does unionize tractability and/or is not non-aroid.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it unionizes tractability or is aroid or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the annulet is not a Sax.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the fact that the primus is not architectural and it is not algolagnic does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the primus is a kind of an equivocation.; sent8 -> int6: if the primus is an equivocation then it is a referent.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the broadcasting is not architectural.
sent15 -> int7: if the sandboy is a Sax and it is aroid then it does not unionize tractability.; sent4 -> int8: that the annulet is not an equivocation but it is a Sax is false if it is algolagnic.; sent17 -> int9: if the annulet is not an influenza but it is a cymbalist it is not a referent.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: the annulet is not a referent.; sent22 -> int11: that the sandboy is aroid hold if it is not a Baptists and it is archival.; sent18 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it does not sneer Bellow hold.; int12 & sent16 -> int13: the sandboy is not a kind of a Baptists.;
$hypothesis$ = the primus is not a referent. ; $context$ = sent1: the annulet is not a Sax if there is something such that it does unionize tractability or it is aroid or both. sent2: the broadcasting is not architectural if there exists something such that it does not unionize tractability. sent3: the fact that the primus is not architectural but algolagnic is wrong. sent4: that something is not a kind of an equivocation but it is a kind of a Sax is not true if it is algolagnic. sent5: the fact that the sandboy is non-architectural but not aroid is incorrect. sent6: the primus is an equivocation if the fact that it is non-architectural thing that is not algolagnic does not hold. sent7: if there exists something such that it is aroid then the annulet is not a Sax. sent8: if something is an equivocation then it is a referent. sent9: The tractability does unionize sandboy. sent10: that the primus is both not architectural and not algolagnic does not hold if the annulet is not a kind of a Sax. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not archival but Hippocratic is not right. sent12: if the fact that the sandboy does not unionize tractability and is not aroid does not hold it is a referent. sent13: that the sandboy is a Sax is not false if the fact that the annulet is not an equivocation and is a Sax is not true. sent14: the sandboy does unionize tractability. sent15: if something is a Sax that is aroid then it does not unionize tractability. sent16: if there exists something such that it does not sneer Bellow that the sandboy is not a kind of a Baptists is right. sent17: if something is both not an influenza and a cymbalist then it is not a referent. sent18: the primus does not sneer Bellow. sent19: the fact that the annulet is not a kind of an influenza but it is a cymbalist is right. sent20: the fact that the sandboy does not bloat and it is not aciculate does not hold. sent21: that the primus is architectural but it is not algolagnic is not true. sent22: something that is both not a Baptists and archival is aroid. sent23: if the annulet is not a Sax then that the primus is architectural thing that is not algolagnic is wrong. sent24: the sandboy is lobeliaceous. sent25: something is not a referent if it does not unionize tractability. sent26: if the annulet is not a Sax then the fact that the fact that the primus is not architectural but it is algolagnic is not right is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the sandboy does unionize tractability and/or is not non-aroid.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it unionizes tractability or is aroid or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the annulet is not a Sax.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the fact that the primus is not architectural and it is not algolagnic does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the primus is a kind of an equivocation.; sent8 -> int6: if the primus is an equivocation then it is a referent.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__