the morphine is phonic.
sent1: the shearwater is not masculine if the rock is not a staginess but masculine. sent2: the stammel is not radiographic. sent3: the morphine is not a kind of a masculine but it is phonic if the fact that the stammel is not masculine hold. sent4: the fact that the stammel is not radiographic but it does peruse is not correct if that the shearwater is non-masculine is not wrong. sent5: the morphine does not peruse if there exists something such that the fact that it is not radiographic and peruse does not hold. sent6: the fact that the stammel is a staginess is correct. sent7: the morphine is not phonic if the fact that the stammel is not radiographic but it is phonic is not right. sent8: the fothergilla is not ventricular if there is something such that the fact that either it is therapeutics or it is acarpelous or both does not hold. sent9: there exists nothing such that it is either therapeutics or acarpelous or both. sent10: if the stammel is masculine then the morphine is not a masculine. sent11: the fact that the stammel is both not a masculine and not radiographic is false if it is a staginess. sent12: that the rock is a kind of phonic thing that is a Punjabi is true if the fothergilla is not ventricular.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stammel is non-masculine.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the stammel is both not a masculine and not radiographic.; sent11 & sent6 -> int2: that the stammel is not masculine and not radiographic is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stammel is a kind of a masculine.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the morphine is not a masculine but phonic.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the morphine does not peruse.
sent9 -> int6: the fact that either the tomahawk is therapeutics or it is acarpelous or both is false.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is therapeutics and/or it is acarpelous is incorrect.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the fothergilla is not ventricular.; sent12 & int8 -> int9: the rock is phonic and it is a Punjabi.; int9 -> int10: the rock is phonic.;
$hypothesis$ = the morphine is phonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the shearwater is not masculine if the rock is not a staginess but masculine. sent2: the stammel is not radiographic. sent3: the morphine is not a kind of a masculine but it is phonic if the fact that the stammel is not masculine hold. sent4: the fact that the stammel is not radiographic but it does peruse is not correct if that the shearwater is non-masculine is not wrong. sent5: the morphine does not peruse if there exists something such that the fact that it is not radiographic and peruse does not hold. sent6: the fact that the stammel is a staginess is correct. sent7: the morphine is not phonic if the fact that the stammel is not radiographic but it is phonic is not right. sent8: the fothergilla is not ventricular if there is something such that the fact that either it is therapeutics or it is acarpelous or both does not hold. sent9: there exists nothing such that it is either therapeutics or acarpelous or both. sent10: if the stammel is masculine then the morphine is not a masculine. sent11: the fact that the stammel is both not a masculine and not radiographic is false if it is a staginess. sent12: that the rock is a kind of phonic thing that is a Punjabi is true if the fothergilla is not ventricular. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stammel is non-masculine.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the stammel is both not a masculine and not radiographic.; sent11 & sent6 -> int2: that the stammel is not masculine and not radiographic is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stammel is a kind of a masculine.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the morphine is not a masculine but phonic.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__