the pro-lifer does not dovetail and it is not a resident.
sent1: if the cryometer is not a trek that it does not roof absinthe and it is not doric does not hold. sent2: if the cryometer is doric then it does tin levirate. sent3: the delayer is a resident. sent4: if the delayer does not tin levirate or is not a kind of a dovetail or both that the pro-lifer does not tin levirate is not wrong. sent5: the cryometer is not a trek if there exists something such that that it is not radioactive and does discover is false. sent6: the barong is nonradioactive if that there exists something such that it does trek is not incorrect. sent7: there is something such that it is nonradioactive and discovers. sent8: if the cryometer is not a trek then the fact that it does not roof absinthe and is doric is not right. sent9: if something is doric it tins levirate. sent10: the pro-lifer is not a dovetail. sent11: the pro-lifer is not a dovetail and not resident if the cryometer tins levirate. sent12: the fact that something does not tin levirate and/or it is not a kind of a dovetail is not incorrect if it is a resident. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not radioactive and does discover is incorrect.
sent13 & sent5 -> int1: the cryometer does not trek.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the cryometer does not roof absinthe and it is non-doric does not hold.;
the barong is nonradioactive.
sent12 -> int3: the delayer does not tin levirate and/or it is not a dovetail if it is a kind of a resident.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the delayer does not tin levirate and/or it is not a dovetail.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the pro-lifer does not tin levirate.;
$hypothesis$ = the pro-lifer does not dovetail and it is not a resident. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cryometer is not a trek that it does not roof absinthe and it is not doric does not hold. sent2: if the cryometer is doric then it does tin levirate. sent3: the delayer is a resident. sent4: if the delayer does not tin levirate or is not a kind of a dovetail or both that the pro-lifer does not tin levirate is not wrong. sent5: the cryometer is not a trek if there exists something such that that it is not radioactive and does discover is false. sent6: the barong is nonradioactive if that there exists something such that it does trek is not incorrect. sent7: there is something such that it is nonradioactive and discovers. sent8: if the cryometer is not a trek then the fact that it does not roof absinthe and is doric is not right. sent9: if something is doric it tins levirate. sent10: the pro-lifer is not a dovetail. sent11: the pro-lifer is not a dovetail and not resident if the cryometer tins levirate. sent12: the fact that something does not tin levirate and/or it is not a kind of a dovetail is not incorrect if it is a resident. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not radioactive and does discover is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent5 -> int1: the cryometer does not trek.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the cryometer does not roof absinthe and it is non-doric does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__