the scooter is imprecise.
sent1: if that something is not a buckthorn and it is not a kind of an inability is false then it does not remove Leptinotarsa. sent2: if the gunmetal is not belemnitic and it does not remove positivism the fact that the scooter is imprecise is correct. sent3: if the fact that the serjeant-at-law is convergent and not unreportable is not right then the Pueblo is a kind of a MB. sent4: if something does remove serjeant-at-law that that it is convergent and it is not unreportable hold is wrong. sent5: if the fact that the radicchio is barytic and is a Rhabdoviridae is not correct then it is barytic. sent6: that something is not a Rhabdoviridae and removes positivism is incorrect if it is a MB. sent7: the gunmetal is precise. sent8: the radicchio is barytic if it is not a buckthorn and not an inability. sent9: if that the radicchio is a kind of imprecise thing that does not remove Leptinotarsa is not correct then the scooter is imprecise. sent10: the serjeant-at-law removes serjeant-at-law. sent11: that the radicchio is barytic and it is a kind of a Rhabdoviridae is not true. sent12: if the rentier either does not remove positivism or is belemnitic or both the gunmetal is barytic. sent13: if the fact that something does remove positivism but it is not a Rhabdoviridae does not hold then it does not remove positivism. sent14: if something does not remove positivism it does remove Leptinotarsa and it is barytic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the radicchio is not a buckthorn and it is not an inability hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the radicchio is barytic.; sent5 & sent11 -> int2: that the radicchio is not barytic is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the radicchio is not a buckthorn and it is not an inability is not correct.; sent1 -> int5: if that the fact that the radicchio is not a kind of a buckthorn and it is not an inability does not hold hold then it does not remove Leptinotarsa.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the radicchio does not remove Leptinotarsa.;
the sweetmeat is belemnitic.
sent14 -> int7: if the radicchio does not remove positivism it does remove Leptinotarsa and is barytic.; sent13 -> int8: that the radicchio does not remove positivism is not wrong if the fact that it does remove positivism and it is not a Rhabdoviridae does not hold.; sent7 -> int9: something is not imprecise.;
$hypothesis$ = the scooter is imprecise. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a buckthorn and it is not a kind of an inability is false then it does not remove Leptinotarsa. sent2: if the gunmetal is not belemnitic and it does not remove positivism the fact that the scooter is imprecise is correct. sent3: if the fact that the serjeant-at-law is convergent and not unreportable is not right then the Pueblo is a kind of a MB. sent4: if something does remove serjeant-at-law that that it is convergent and it is not unreportable hold is wrong. sent5: if the fact that the radicchio is barytic and is a Rhabdoviridae is not correct then it is barytic. sent6: that something is not a Rhabdoviridae and removes positivism is incorrect if it is a MB. sent7: the gunmetal is precise. sent8: the radicchio is barytic if it is not a buckthorn and not an inability. sent9: if that the radicchio is a kind of imprecise thing that does not remove Leptinotarsa is not correct then the scooter is imprecise. sent10: the serjeant-at-law removes serjeant-at-law. sent11: that the radicchio is barytic and it is a kind of a Rhabdoviridae is not true. sent12: if the rentier either does not remove positivism or is belemnitic or both the gunmetal is barytic. sent13: if the fact that something does remove positivism but it is not a Rhabdoviridae does not hold then it does not remove positivism. sent14: if something does not remove positivism it does remove Leptinotarsa and it is barytic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the radicchio is not a buckthorn and it is not an inability hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the radicchio is barytic.; sent5 & sent11 -> int2: that the radicchio is not barytic is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the radicchio is not a buckthorn and it is not an inability is not correct.; sent1 -> int5: if that the fact that the radicchio is not a kind of a buckthorn and it is not an inability does not hold hold then it does not remove Leptinotarsa.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the radicchio does not remove Leptinotarsa.; __UNKNOWN__