the fact that the rearing poke but not the officiating occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the instruction happens. sent2: the drunkenness occurs if the flinching happens. sent3: the coffining skilletfish does not occur. sent4: if the loading sifter does not occur but the rearing feathertop occurs then the hearts does not occur. sent5: the Yugoslavianness does not occur and the coffining chaise happens. sent6: the fact that the sentimentalising does not occur hold. sent7: the fact that the mesialness and the boondoggle happens is not true. sent8: that not the cleaving buckshot but the operative occurs is not true if the flinching does not occur. sent9: the loading sifter does not occur if the fact that the loading sifter occurs and the operativeness occurs is wrong. sent10: the rearing poke happens if the fact that not the cleaving buckshot but the operative occurs does not hold. sent11: the fact that the rearing feathertop does not occur but the loading sifter happens is not true if the drunkenness occurs. sent12: that the fact that the habituation does not occur and the flinching does not occur is false is correct if the drunkenness does not occur. sent13: that the rearing feathertop occurs and the loading sifter occurs is not right. sent14: the habituation occurs if that the habituation does not occur and the flinching does not occur is incorrect. sent15: the officiating does not occur if the mesialness happens. sent16: that not the rearing feathertop but the loading sifter occurs is triggered by that the coffining skilletfish does not occur. sent17: the fact that both the Africanness and the denigration occurs is wrong if the cranialness does not occur. sent18: not the drunkenness but the rearing poke occurs if the officiating occurs. sent19: if that the non-mesialness and the boondoggle happens does not hold the officiating does not occur. sent20: the fact that the mesialness does not occur but the boondoggle happens is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flinching occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the drunkenness happens is not false.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that not the rearing feathertop but the loading sifter occurs is wrong.; sent16 & sent3 -> int3: the rearing feathertop does not occur but the loading sifter occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the flinching does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the cleaving buckshot does not occur but the operative happens is false.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the rearing poke happens is not wrong.; sent19 & sent20 -> int8: the officiating does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the habituation but not the hearts occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the rearing poke but not the officiating occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the instruction happens. sent2: the drunkenness occurs if the flinching happens. sent3: the coffining skilletfish does not occur. sent4: if the loading sifter does not occur but the rearing feathertop occurs then the hearts does not occur. sent5: the Yugoslavianness does not occur and the coffining chaise happens. sent6: the fact that the sentimentalising does not occur hold. sent7: the fact that the mesialness and the boondoggle happens is not true. sent8: that not the cleaving buckshot but the operative occurs is not true if the flinching does not occur. sent9: the loading sifter does not occur if the fact that the loading sifter occurs and the operativeness occurs is wrong. sent10: the rearing poke happens if the fact that not the cleaving buckshot but the operative occurs does not hold. sent11: the fact that the rearing feathertop does not occur but the loading sifter happens is not true if the drunkenness occurs. sent12: that the fact that the habituation does not occur and the flinching does not occur is false is correct if the drunkenness does not occur. sent13: that the rearing feathertop occurs and the loading sifter occurs is not right. sent14: the habituation occurs if that the habituation does not occur and the flinching does not occur is incorrect. sent15: the officiating does not occur if the mesialness happens. sent16: that not the rearing feathertop but the loading sifter occurs is triggered by that the coffining skilletfish does not occur. sent17: the fact that both the Africanness and the denigration occurs is wrong if the cranialness does not occur. sent18: not the drunkenness but the rearing poke occurs if the officiating occurs. sent19: if that the non-mesialness and the boondoggle happens does not hold the officiating does not occur. sent20: the fact that the mesialness does not occur but the boondoggle happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flinching occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the drunkenness happens is not false.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that not the rearing feathertop but the loading sifter occurs is wrong.; sent16 & sent3 -> int3: the rearing feathertop does not occur but the loading sifter occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the flinching does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the cleaving buckshot does not occur but the operative happens is false.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the rearing poke happens is not wrong.; sent19 & sent20 -> int8: the officiating does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__