the disentangling Aporocactus occurs and the poeticness does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the vocalizing does not occur is not false the fact that the consternating yuppie or the poeticness or both occurs is true. sent2: the strengthening Nigeria occurs if the poeticness occurs. sent3: the vocalizing occurs. sent4: that both the eolithicness and the Hittite occurs does not hold. sent5: the magistracy does not occur. sent6: the implosion occurs. sent7: that the consternating yuppie occurs causes the strengthening Nigeria. sent8: if the crib does not occur the vocalizing happens. sent9: if the hyperextension does not occur then the fact that the eolithicness happens and the Hittiteness does not occur does not hold. sent10: the non-poeticness is triggered by that the consternating yuppie does not occur. sent11: the crib does not occur if the fact that the crib but not the entrance occurs is not correct. sent12: if the crib does not occur then the vocalizing happens and the disentangling Aporocactus happens. sent13: the fact that the fact that the tinning happens and the strengthening Nigeria does not occur is wrong is not incorrect. sent14: if the ovarianness occurs then the fact that that the cribbing occurs but the entrance does not occur does not hold is not wrong. sent15: if the hyperextension does not occur that both the eolithicness and the Hittiteness happens is not right. sent16: the consternating yuppie does not occur if that the eolithicness and the non-Hittiteness happens is not right. sent17: that the ovarianness happens is true. sent18: if the hyperextension occurs then that the fact that the implosion occurs but the magistracy does not occur does not hold is not wrong. sent19: the Hittiteness leads to that the consternating yuppie does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hyperextension occurs.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: that the implosion happens and the magistracy does not occur is not right.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: the implosion happens but the magistracy does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the hyperextension does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that both the eolithicness and the non-Hittiteness occurs is false.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the consternating yuppie does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the poeticness does not occur.; sent14 & sent17 -> int8: the fact that the cribbing but not the entrance occurs does not hold.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the crib does not occur.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the vocalizing happens and the disentangling Aporocactus happens.; int10 -> int11: the disentangling Aporocactus occurs.; int7 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the strengthening Nigeria happens but the headshot does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the disentangling Aporocactus occurs and the poeticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the vocalizing does not occur is not false the fact that the consternating yuppie or the poeticness or both occurs is true. sent2: the strengthening Nigeria occurs if the poeticness occurs. sent3: the vocalizing occurs. sent4: that both the eolithicness and the Hittite occurs does not hold. sent5: the magistracy does not occur. sent6: the implosion occurs. sent7: that the consternating yuppie occurs causes the strengthening Nigeria. sent8: if the crib does not occur the vocalizing happens. sent9: if the hyperextension does not occur then the fact that the eolithicness happens and the Hittiteness does not occur does not hold. sent10: the non-poeticness is triggered by that the consternating yuppie does not occur. sent11: the crib does not occur if the fact that the crib but not the entrance occurs is not correct. sent12: if the crib does not occur then the vocalizing happens and the disentangling Aporocactus happens. sent13: the fact that the fact that the tinning happens and the strengthening Nigeria does not occur is wrong is not incorrect. sent14: if the ovarianness occurs then the fact that that the cribbing occurs but the entrance does not occur does not hold is not wrong. sent15: if the hyperextension does not occur that both the eolithicness and the Hittiteness happens is not right. sent16: the consternating yuppie does not occur if that the eolithicness and the non-Hittiteness happens is not right. sent17: that the ovarianness happens is true. sent18: if the hyperextension occurs then that the fact that the implosion occurs but the magistracy does not occur does not hold is not wrong. sent19: the Hittiteness leads to that the consternating yuppie does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hyperextension occurs.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: that the implosion happens and the magistracy does not occur is not right.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: the implosion happens but the magistracy does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the hyperextension does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that both the eolithicness and the non-Hittiteness occurs is false.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the consternating yuppie does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the poeticness does not occur.; sent14 & sent17 -> int8: the fact that the cribbing but not the entrance occurs does not hold.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the crib does not occur.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the vocalizing happens and the disentangling Aporocactus happens.; int10 -> int11: the disentangling Aporocactus occurs.; int7 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__