the backpedaling does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the cycle does not occur hold. sent2: the backpedaling does not occur if the fact that the crouch occurs is true. sent3: the dousing happens and/or the counterfire occurs. sent4: that the fight does not occur is prevented by that the crouch does not occur and the revenging corruptness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the dousing occurs or the counterfire does not occur or both is false if the advising happens. sent6: the counterfire occurs if the advising happens. sent7: the fight brings about either that the dousing occurs or that the counterfire does not occur or both. sent8: that the crouch does not occur is correct. sent9: the counterfire happens. sent10: the advising occurs but the cycling does not occur. sent11: that that the crouch but not the revenging corruptness occurs does not hold is not false. sent12: that the fighting does not occur is prevented by that the crouching but not the revenging corruptness occurs. sent13: if the fighting happens then the fact that the dousing occurs or the counterfire occurs or both is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crouch does not occur and the revenging corruptness does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fighting occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the dousing happens and/or the counterfire does not occur.; sent10 -> int3: the fact that the advising occurs is not false.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the dousing occurs or the counterfire does not occur or both is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the crouch does not occur and the revenging corruptness does not occur is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the backpedaling does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cycle does not occur hold. sent2: the backpedaling does not occur if the fact that the crouch occurs is true. sent3: the dousing happens and/or the counterfire occurs. sent4: that the fight does not occur is prevented by that the crouch does not occur and the revenging corruptness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the dousing occurs or the counterfire does not occur or both is false if the advising happens. sent6: the counterfire occurs if the advising happens. sent7: the fight brings about either that the dousing occurs or that the counterfire does not occur or both. sent8: that the crouch does not occur is correct. sent9: the counterfire happens. sent10: the advising occurs but the cycling does not occur. sent11: that that the crouch but not the revenging corruptness occurs does not hold is not false. sent12: that the fighting does not occur is prevented by that the crouching but not the revenging corruptness occurs. sent13: if the fighting happens then the fact that the dousing occurs or the counterfire occurs or both is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crouch does not occur and the revenging corruptness does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fighting occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the dousing happens and/or the counterfire does not occur.; sent10 -> int3: the fact that the advising occurs is not false.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the dousing occurs or the counterfire does not occur or both is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the crouch does not occur and the revenging corruptness does not occur is not true.; __UNKNOWN__