both the shining banksia and the carefulness occurs.
sent1: if the motility occurs but the nonresistance does not occur the coating unthoughtfulness does not occur. sent2: the audiometricness occurs. sent3: the nonresistance does not occur if the fact that not the adenoidalness but the teasing happens is not correct. sent4: if the motility occurs then that that not the adenoidalness but the teasing happens is not true hold. sent5: that the abundantness happens and the nonresistance occurs is triggered by that the wise does not occur. sent6: that the nonresistance does not occur is brought about by that the adenoidalness occurs. sent7: the fact that the verticalness does not occur is right if the rabidness occurs. sent8: the phallicness does not occur. sent9: the patching happens. sent10: the abundantness is triggered by the non-wiseness. sent11: the metacentricness happens. sent12: that the wise occurs does not hold. sent13: if either the shining banksia does not occur or the abundantness does not occur or both then that the shining banksia does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: if the motility does not occur the reddening proposition happens. sent15: that the shining banksia occurs is caused by that the reddening proposition happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the motility occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that both the non-adenoidalness and the teasing happens does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the nonresistance does not occur.; sent5 & sent12 -> int3: both the abundantness and the nonresistance occurs.; int3 -> int4: the nonresistance happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the motility does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the reddening proposition occurs.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the shining banksia occurs.;
that the shining banksia occurs and the carefulness happens is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = both the shining banksia and the carefulness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the motility occurs but the nonresistance does not occur the coating unthoughtfulness does not occur. sent2: the audiometricness occurs. sent3: the nonresistance does not occur if the fact that not the adenoidalness but the teasing happens is not correct. sent4: if the motility occurs then that that not the adenoidalness but the teasing happens is not true hold. sent5: that the abundantness happens and the nonresistance occurs is triggered by that the wise does not occur. sent6: that the nonresistance does not occur is brought about by that the adenoidalness occurs. sent7: the fact that the verticalness does not occur is right if the rabidness occurs. sent8: the phallicness does not occur. sent9: the patching happens. sent10: the abundantness is triggered by the non-wiseness. sent11: the metacentricness happens. sent12: that the wise occurs does not hold. sent13: if either the shining banksia does not occur or the abundantness does not occur or both then that the shining banksia does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: if the motility does not occur the reddening proposition happens. sent15: that the shining banksia occurs is caused by that the reddening proposition happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the motility occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that both the non-adenoidalness and the teasing happens does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the nonresistance does not occur.; sent5 & sent12 -> int3: both the abundantness and the nonresistance occurs.; int3 -> int4: the nonresistance happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the motility does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the reddening proposition occurs.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the shining banksia occurs.; __UNKNOWN__