the Protestant does not douse.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Aten is true the fact that the lister is even and submissive is incorrect. sent2: if the Protestant does douse it does not compensate engraver and it is a Akhbari. sent3: if the fact that something is even thing that is submissive is not true it does not even. sent4: the fact that the engraver does crust Gadus is correct if the Protestant does not compensate engraver but it is a kind of a Akhbari. sent5: the Protestant is a Akhbari. sent6: if the sandwichman does forecast Suriname the lister evens. sent7: the desmid is topical if the engraver crusts Gadus. sent8: if the desmid is topical the sandwichman does forecast Suriname. sent9: if the desmid is not topical that the engraver does crust Gadus but it does not douse does not hold. sent10: the longwool is a kind of a Aten.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Protestant douses.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Protestant does not compensate engraver but it is a kind of a Akhbari.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the engraver crusts Gadus.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the desmid is topical.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the sandwichman does forecast Suriname.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the lister does even.; sent3 -> int6: the lister does not even if that it is a kind of even thing that is submissive is not true.; sent10 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Aten.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the fact that the lister does even and is submissive is wrong.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the lister does not even.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the Protestant does douse.
$hypothesis$ = the Protestant does not douse. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Aten is true the fact that the lister is even and submissive is incorrect. sent2: if the Protestant does douse it does not compensate engraver and it is a Akhbari. sent3: if the fact that something is even thing that is submissive is not true it does not even. sent4: the fact that the engraver does crust Gadus is correct if the Protestant does not compensate engraver but it is a kind of a Akhbari. sent5: the Protestant is a Akhbari. sent6: if the sandwichman does forecast Suriname the lister evens. sent7: the desmid is topical if the engraver crusts Gadus. sent8: if the desmid is topical the sandwichman does forecast Suriname. sent9: if the desmid is not topical that the engraver does crust Gadus but it does not douse does not hold. sent10: the longwool is a kind of a Aten. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Protestant douses.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Protestant does not compensate engraver but it is a kind of a Akhbari.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the engraver crusts Gadus.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the desmid is topical.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the sandwichman does forecast Suriname.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the lister does even.; sent3 -> int6: the lister does not even if that it is a kind of even thing that is submissive is not true.; sent10 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Aten.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the fact that the lister does even and is submissive is wrong.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the lister does not even.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__