the presenter is not an intrigue.
sent1: the flank does deprive driftage. sent2: if the fact that the videotape is not a cry and/or it is not pancreatic is not true the cabinet is temperamental. sent3: if the cabinet is temperamental the lanternfish is a skittishness. sent4: the presenter intrigues if the lanternfish is a kind of a skittishness. sent5: The driftage does deprive flank. sent6: the fact that the videotape does not cry and/or it is not pancreatic does not hold if the flank deprives driftage.
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: that the videotape does not cry or it is not pancreatic or both is not correct.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the cabinet is temperamental.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the lanternfish is a kind of a skittishness.; sent4 & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the presenter is not an intrigue. ; $context$ = sent1: the flank does deprive driftage. sent2: if the fact that the videotape is not a cry and/or it is not pancreatic is not true the cabinet is temperamental. sent3: if the cabinet is temperamental the lanternfish is a skittishness. sent4: the presenter intrigues if the lanternfish is a kind of a skittishness. sent5: The driftage does deprive flank. sent6: the fact that the videotape does not cry and/or it is not pancreatic does not hold if the flank deprives driftage. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: that the videotape does not cry or it is not pancreatic or both is not correct.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the cabinet is temperamental.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the lanternfish is a kind of a skittishness.; sent4 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__