the emmer does straighten gourde and/or is not a iridectomy.
sent1: the chine is gone. sent2: if something is bryophytic and/or it is a Argive it is not exilic. sent3: that the fact that the emmer straightens gourde and/or is not a iridectomy is true is false if the boiling is a FET. sent4: the boiling is not a FET. sent5: if the ghost does straighten stair-rod and is not exilic then the boiling is not a kind of a Argive. sent6: something does push sociometry if it is not a iridectomy. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is unimpressive thing that is unadoptable is wrong the encephalogram is bryophytic. sent8: if the chine straightens stair-rod then the astrakhan is not a iridectomy. sent9: if the astrakhan is not a iridectomy the emmer straightens gourde and/or is not a iridectomy. sent10: if the chine goes then it is linguistic. sent11: if something is not a Argive then that it is a FET and bryophytic is not correct. sent12: the astrakhan is not a iridectomy if the chine pushes sociometry. sent13: if the encephalogram pushes sociometry the ghost straightens stair-rod but it is non-exilic. sent14: the astrakhan is not linguistic if the pisser does go and it is linguistic. sent15: the encephalogram is not a iridectomy if something is a kind of a bark that does not straighten gourde. sent16: if something is not a bark then the fact that it does straighten stair-rod and it pushes sociometry does not hold. sent17: something that is linguistic does bark and does not straighten gourde. sent18: if something is not linguistic it is not a bark. sent19: the pisser is a gone that is linguistic if it does not ash innervation. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is a FET and is bryophytic does not hold then the flagfish is a OSHA. sent21: the fact that the pisser does not ash innervation is correct. sent22: if the encephalogram is a kind of a Argive but it is not bryophytic then the ghost is bryophytic. sent23: the boiling is a kind of a FET if the ghost is bryophytic. sent24: if the encephalogram is not exilic either the chine pushes sociometry or it straightens stair-rod or both.
sent2 -> int1: the encephalogram is not exilic if it is bryophytic and/or is Argive.;
either the flagfish is metaphysical or it is a OSHA or both.
sent11 -> int2: if the boiling is not Argive the fact that it is a kind of a FET and it is bryophytic is wrong.; sent6 -> int3: the encephalogram does push sociometry if it is not a kind of a iridectomy.; sent17 -> int4: if the chine is linguistic it barks and it does not straighten gourde.; sent10 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the chine is linguistic is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chine does bark but it does not straighten gourde.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a bark that does not straighten gourde.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the encephalogram is not a iridectomy.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the encephalogram pushes sociometry.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the ghost straightens stair-rod and is not exilic.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the boiling is non-Argive.; int2 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the boiling is a kind of a FET that is bryophytic does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is a FET and it is bryophytic is not right.; int13 & sent20 -> int14: the flagfish is a OSHA.; int14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the emmer does straighten gourde and/or is not a iridectomy. ; $context$ = sent1: the chine is gone. sent2: if something is bryophytic and/or it is a Argive it is not exilic. sent3: that the fact that the emmer straightens gourde and/or is not a iridectomy is true is false if the boiling is a FET. sent4: the boiling is not a FET. sent5: if the ghost does straighten stair-rod and is not exilic then the boiling is not a kind of a Argive. sent6: something does push sociometry if it is not a iridectomy. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is unimpressive thing that is unadoptable is wrong the encephalogram is bryophytic. sent8: if the chine straightens stair-rod then the astrakhan is not a iridectomy. sent9: if the astrakhan is not a iridectomy the emmer straightens gourde and/or is not a iridectomy. sent10: if the chine goes then it is linguistic. sent11: if something is not a Argive then that it is a FET and bryophytic is not correct. sent12: the astrakhan is not a iridectomy if the chine pushes sociometry. sent13: if the encephalogram pushes sociometry the ghost straightens stair-rod but it is non-exilic. sent14: the astrakhan is not linguistic if the pisser does go and it is linguistic. sent15: the encephalogram is not a iridectomy if something is a kind of a bark that does not straighten gourde. sent16: if something is not a bark then the fact that it does straighten stair-rod and it pushes sociometry does not hold. sent17: something that is linguistic does bark and does not straighten gourde. sent18: if something is not linguistic it is not a bark. sent19: the pisser is a gone that is linguistic if it does not ash innervation. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is a FET and is bryophytic does not hold then the flagfish is a OSHA. sent21: the fact that the pisser does not ash innervation is correct. sent22: if the encephalogram is a kind of a Argive but it is not bryophytic then the ghost is bryophytic. sent23: the boiling is a kind of a FET if the ghost is bryophytic. sent24: if the encephalogram is not exilic either the chine pushes sociometry or it straightens stair-rod or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the encephalogram is not exilic if it is bryophytic and/or is Argive.; __UNKNOWN__