the scuffle is a kind of an infatuation.
sent1: if there is something such that it does not spray birdcage then the scuffle is an infatuation. sent2: if something is not a grass then the fact that it is a kind of an infatuation and it does not spray loved does not hold. sent3: the tucker is not a grass. sent4: there is something such that it is not a kind of a asynclitism and/or it does spray birdcage. sent5: that the melosa does not consist hold if the impressionist is not a Stilton but it is a kind of a Potemkin. sent6: if something is not a grass it either does thwart or does not communicate machilid or both. sent7: something that is not a kind of a grass is not a thwart and/or communicates machilid. sent8: something is not a grass if it is not a kind of a asynclitism and it does not spray birdcage. sent9: the tucker is not a thwart or does communicate machilid or both. sent10: the Becket does grass. sent11: if something is not a grass then either it is not a thwart or it does not communicate machilid or both. sent12: either the melosa is not a asynclitism or it does spray birdcage or both. sent13: if that the tucker is not a grass is correct it is a thwart and/or it does not communicate machilid. sent14: the scuffle is an infatuation if something is not a asynclitism or it does not spray birdcage or both. sent15: if the melosa does not consist then the scuffle is not a asynclitism and does not spray birdcage. sent16: either the tucker thwarts or it does not communicate machilid or both. sent17: something is a asynclitism and/or it does not spray birdcage. sent18: something is not an infatuation if the fact that it is an infatuation and it does not spray loved is wrong. sent19: if the tucker is not a thwart and/or it does not communicate machilid it does not spray loved. sent20: the cleaner is patellar but it is not Sinhala. sent21: something is not a Stilton but it is a Potemkin if it does not spray Maidu. sent22: the melosa is not a asynclitism or it does spray birdcage or both if the tucker does not spray loved. sent23: either the tucker is not a thwart or it communicates machilid or both if it is not a grass.
sent11 -> int1: the tucker either does not thwart or does not communicate machilid or both if it is not a kind of a grass.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the tucker does not thwart and/or it does not communicate machilid.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the tucker does not spray loved.;
the scuffle is not a kind of an infatuation.
sent18 -> int4: if the fact that the scuffle is an infatuation that does not spray loved is false it is not an infatuation.; sent2 -> int5: the fact that the scuffle is a kind of an infatuation that does not spray loved does not hold if it is not a kind of a grass.; sent8 -> int6: if the scuffle is not a kind of a asynclitism and does not spray birdcage it is not a grass.; sent21 -> int7: if the impressionist does not spray Maidu that it is both not a Stilton and a Potemkin is correct.; sent20 -> int8: there is something such that it is patellar and it is not Sinhala.;
$hypothesis$ = the scuffle is a kind of an infatuation. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does not spray birdcage then the scuffle is an infatuation. sent2: if something is not a grass then the fact that it is a kind of an infatuation and it does not spray loved does not hold. sent3: the tucker is not a grass. sent4: there is something such that it is not a kind of a asynclitism and/or it does spray birdcage. sent5: that the melosa does not consist hold if the impressionist is not a Stilton but it is a kind of a Potemkin. sent6: if something is not a grass it either does thwart or does not communicate machilid or both. sent7: something that is not a kind of a grass is not a thwart and/or communicates machilid. sent8: something is not a grass if it is not a kind of a asynclitism and it does not spray birdcage. sent9: the tucker is not a thwart or does communicate machilid or both. sent10: the Becket does grass. sent11: if something is not a grass then either it is not a thwart or it does not communicate machilid or both. sent12: either the melosa is not a asynclitism or it does spray birdcage or both. sent13: if that the tucker is not a grass is correct it is a thwart and/or it does not communicate machilid. sent14: the scuffle is an infatuation if something is not a asynclitism or it does not spray birdcage or both. sent15: if the melosa does not consist then the scuffle is not a asynclitism and does not spray birdcage. sent16: either the tucker thwarts or it does not communicate machilid or both. sent17: something is a asynclitism and/or it does not spray birdcage. sent18: something is not an infatuation if the fact that it is an infatuation and it does not spray loved is wrong. sent19: if the tucker is not a thwart and/or it does not communicate machilid it does not spray loved. sent20: the cleaner is patellar but it is not Sinhala. sent21: something is not a Stilton but it is a Potemkin if it does not spray Maidu. sent22: the melosa is not a asynclitism or it does spray birdcage or both if the tucker does not spray loved. sent23: either the tucker is not a thwart or it communicates machilid or both if it is not a grass. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the tucker either does not thwart or does not communicate machilid or both if it is not a kind of a grass.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the tucker does not thwart and/or it does not communicate machilid.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the tucker does not spray loved.; __UNKNOWN__