the exporter is a kind of a romantic and it is a kind of a Brioschi.
sent1: if the fact that the necessity is not Romans but most is incorrect then the wildlife is not a kind of a Woodward. sent2: the exporter does not supplement if the fact that the crus is not a Brioschi hold. sent3: if the fact that something does not supplement is not incorrect the fact that the exporter is a kind of a romantic that is a Brioschi is not true. sent4: the Medoc is not a kind of a quetzal. sent5: the fact that the refraction is a transactinide and does not evade is incorrect if the Medoc is not a quetzal. sent6: the drip is not a Romans if there exists something such that that it is a transactinide and does not evade is not right. sent7: if the drip is not a Romans then the fact that the necessity is not a Romans but it is most does not hold. sent8: the crus is not a supplement if the wildlife is not a Woodward. sent9: if that the necessity is not a Romans is not wrong then the fact that the Medoc is a Brioschi and a quetzal is incorrect. sent10: if the refraction is a Romans that the necessity is a transactinide does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that it does not achromatize necessity. sent12: the drip is not most.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: that the refraction is a transactinide that does not evade does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a transactinide and does not evade is wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the drip is not a Romans.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the necessity is not Romans but it is most is not right.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the wildlife is not a Woodward.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the crus is not a supplement.; int6 -> int7: something is not a supplement.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is not hexangular.
sent12 -> int8: there is something such that it is not most.;
$hypothesis$ = the exporter is a kind of a romantic and it is a kind of a Brioschi. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the necessity is not Romans but most is incorrect then the wildlife is not a kind of a Woodward. sent2: the exporter does not supplement if the fact that the crus is not a Brioschi hold. sent3: if the fact that something does not supplement is not incorrect the fact that the exporter is a kind of a romantic that is a Brioschi is not true. sent4: the Medoc is not a kind of a quetzal. sent5: the fact that the refraction is a transactinide and does not evade is incorrect if the Medoc is not a quetzal. sent6: the drip is not a Romans if there exists something such that that it is a transactinide and does not evade is not right. sent7: if the drip is not a Romans then the fact that the necessity is not a Romans but it is most does not hold. sent8: the crus is not a supplement if the wildlife is not a Woodward. sent9: if that the necessity is not a Romans is not wrong then the fact that the Medoc is a Brioschi and a quetzal is incorrect. sent10: if the refraction is a Romans that the necessity is a transactinide does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that it does not achromatize necessity. sent12: the drip is not most. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: that the refraction is a transactinide that does not evade does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a transactinide and does not evade is wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the drip is not a Romans.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the necessity is not Romans but it is most is not right.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the wildlife is not a Woodward.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the crus is not a supplement.; int6 -> int7: something is not a supplement.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__