the fact that that the decoying jade does not occur and the spar does not occur is triggered by the venting announcement is not true.
sent1: the spar does not occur and the collateral does not occur if the decoying enforcement does not occur. sent2: the sparring does not occur and the agribusiness does not occur if the foxhunt does not occur. sent3: the motorboating does not occur and the escalading does not occur. sent4: the agribusiness and the foxhunt happens. sent5: the fact that the decoying enforcement does not occur is correct. sent6: the foaling sanguinity does not occur if that the description happens and the rummy does not occur is not right. sent7: if the editorialness happens the fact that the foaling variometer does not occur and the supportiveness happens is false. sent8: the ignobleness occurs and the collateral does not occur if the augiticness does not occur. sent9: that the description happens and the rummy does not occur is wrong if the sterilizing Chelidonium does not occur. sent10: the sterilizing Chelidonium does not occur if that not the foaling variometer but the supportiveness occurs is false. sent11: the collateral does not occur. sent12: the foxhunt occurs. sent13: the agribusiness is prevented by that the decoying jade and the venting announcement occurs. sent14: if the fact that the venting announcement does not occur hold both the decoying jade and the alignment occurs. sent15: that the decoying antlion does not occur or the snap or both prevents that the augiticness happens. sent16: the editorialness occurs. sent17: that the snapping happens and the foaling dipole occurs is brought about by that the foaling sanguinity does not occur. sent18: the sterilizing nonmetal does not occur and the foaling novitiate does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decoying jade happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the venting announcement happens.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the decoying jade and the venting announcement happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the agribusiness does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the agribusiness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the decoying jade does not occur.; sent1 & sent5 -> int6: the sparring does not occur and the collateralness does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the sparring does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the decoying jade does not occur and the spar does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the alignment happens is not false.
sent7 & sent16 -> int9: that the foaling variometer does not occur and the supportiveness occurs is false.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the sterilizing Chelidonium does not occur.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: that the description happens but the rummy does not occur is wrong.; sent6 & int11 -> int12: the foaling sanguinity does not occur.; sent17 & int12 -> int13: the snap occurs and the foaling dipole happens.; int13 -> int14: the snapping happens.; int14 -> int15: the decoying antlion does not occur and/or the snapping happens.; sent15 & int15 -> int16: the augiticness does not occur.; sent8 & int16 -> int17: both the ignobleness and the non-collateralness happens.; int17 -> int18: the collateral does not occur.; int18 -> int19: either the decoying enforcement does not occur or the collateralness does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the decoying jade does not occur and the spar does not occur is triggered by the venting announcement is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the spar does not occur and the collateral does not occur if the decoying enforcement does not occur. sent2: the sparring does not occur and the agribusiness does not occur if the foxhunt does not occur. sent3: the motorboating does not occur and the escalading does not occur. sent4: the agribusiness and the foxhunt happens. sent5: the fact that the decoying enforcement does not occur is correct. sent6: the foaling sanguinity does not occur if that the description happens and the rummy does not occur is not right. sent7: if the editorialness happens the fact that the foaling variometer does not occur and the supportiveness happens is false. sent8: the ignobleness occurs and the collateral does not occur if the augiticness does not occur. sent9: that the description happens and the rummy does not occur is wrong if the sterilizing Chelidonium does not occur. sent10: the sterilizing Chelidonium does not occur if that not the foaling variometer but the supportiveness occurs is false. sent11: the collateral does not occur. sent12: the foxhunt occurs. sent13: the agribusiness is prevented by that the decoying jade and the venting announcement occurs. sent14: if the fact that the venting announcement does not occur hold both the decoying jade and the alignment occurs. sent15: that the decoying antlion does not occur or the snap or both prevents that the augiticness happens. sent16: the editorialness occurs. sent17: that the snapping happens and the foaling dipole occurs is brought about by that the foaling sanguinity does not occur. sent18: the sterilizing nonmetal does not occur and the foaling novitiate does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decoying jade happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the venting announcement happens.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the decoying jade and the venting announcement happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the agribusiness does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the agribusiness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the decoying jade does not occur.; sent1 & sent5 -> int6: the sparring does not occur and the collateralness does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the sparring does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the decoying jade does not occur and the spar does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__