the fact that the Angevin does not incarnate and is a photosphere is incorrect.
sent1: if the marseille is not a kind of a xanthophyll that the Angevin does not incarnate but it is a kind of a photosphere is not wrong. sent2: the metalhead is not a centerfielder. sent3: if the Angevin is not catachrestic but it is a kind of a rentier then it is not a photosphere. sent4: the Angevin is not a centerfielder if it does not incarnate and it is a photosphere. sent5: the Angevin is a photosphere. sent6: if the Angevin does not hydroplane but it is Kafkaesque then the Ostyak is not Kafkaesque. sent7: that the flush does right Cattell and it does right Gilman is not true. sent8: the hubcap is not a photosphere. sent9: a non-Kafkaesque thing is both a xanthophyll and a centerfielder. sent10: something is not a leaflet and does right coppersmith if it is a kind of a xanthophyll. sent11: the fact that the rheometer is not a kind of a xanthophyll and rights mithramycin is false. sent12: if the Angevin is a centerfielder then it does right Passiflora. sent13: the launderette incarnates. sent14: something is not intrauterine but it is single-lane if it is not a fairway. sent15: the Angevin is a kind of a gemma if it is a xanthophyll. sent16: the Angevin is a xanthophyll. sent17: if something is not intrauterine then it does not hydroplane and is Kafkaesque. sent18: the Angevin is not a fairway.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Angevin does not incarnate but it is a photosphere.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Angevin is not a kind of a centerfielder.;
the Ostyak is not a leaflet and rights coppersmith.
sent10 -> int2: if the Ostyak is a xanthophyll then it is not a leaflet and it rights coppersmith.; sent9 -> int3: if the Ostyak is not Kafkaesque it is a xanthophyll and it is a kind of a centerfielder.; sent17 -> int4: if the Angevin is not intrauterine then it does not hydroplane and it is Kafkaesque.; sent14 -> int5: if the Angevin is not a kind of a fairway it is not intrauterine but single-lane.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the Angevin is both not intrauterine and single-lane.; int6 -> int7: the Angevin is not intrauterine.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the Angevin does not hydroplane but it is Kafkaesque.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the Ostyak is not Kafkaesque.; int3 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the Ostyak is a xanthophyll and a centerfielder is correct.; int10 -> int11: the Ostyak is a kind of a xanthophyll.; int2 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Angevin does not incarnate and is a photosphere is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the marseille is not a kind of a xanthophyll that the Angevin does not incarnate but it is a kind of a photosphere is not wrong. sent2: the metalhead is not a centerfielder. sent3: if the Angevin is not catachrestic but it is a kind of a rentier then it is not a photosphere. sent4: the Angevin is not a centerfielder if it does not incarnate and it is a photosphere. sent5: the Angevin is a photosphere. sent6: if the Angevin does not hydroplane but it is Kafkaesque then the Ostyak is not Kafkaesque. sent7: that the flush does right Cattell and it does right Gilman is not true. sent8: the hubcap is not a photosphere. sent9: a non-Kafkaesque thing is both a xanthophyll and a centerfielder. sent10: something is not a leaflet and does right coppersmith if it is a kind of a xanthophyll. sent11: the fact that the rheometer is not a kind of a xanthophyll and rights mithramycin is false. sent12: if the Angevin is a centerfielder then it does right Passiflora. sent13: the launderette incarnates. sent14: something is not intrauterine but it is single-lane if it is not a fairway. sent15: the Angevin is a kind of a gemma if it is a xanthophyll. sent16: the Angevin is a xanthophyll. sent17: if something is not intrauterine then it does not hydroplane and is Kafkaesque. sent18: the Angevin is not a fairway. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Angevin does not incarnate but it is a photosphere.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Angevin is not a kind of a centerfielder.; __UNKNOWN__