the whitecap but not the ejaculating manned occurs.
sent1: the superannuation does not occur and the energy does not occur if the ejaculating manned occurs. sent2: the energy occurs. sent3: the whitecap happens. sent4: if the wolflikeness does not occur then the whitecap does not occur and the Fahrenheit does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ejaculating manned happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the superannuation does not occur and the energy does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the energy does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ejaculating manned does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the propagandizing happens.
$hypothesis$ = the whitecap but not the ejaculating manned occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the superannuation does not occur and the energy does not occur if the ejaculating manned occurs. sent2: the energy occurs. sent3: the whitecap happens. sent4: if the wolflikeness does not occur then the whitecap does not occur and the Fahrenheit does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ejaculating manned happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the superannuation does not occur and the energy does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the energy does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ejaculating manned does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__