the fact that the fruiterer does not ensnare hold.
sent1: if that something is not a Trichodontidae and it is not scalene is not right then it does not furrow. sent2: the fact that the cuprite is excusable and does not ensnare does not hold. sent3: everything does not salt Haemoproteus. sent4: if the fact that the cuprite is not inexcusable is not wrong the fact that the fruiterer is not a vulgarizer and it is not inexcusable is not true. sent5: if something is inexcusable it does not ensnare. sent6: if the fruiterer is not a vulgarizer that the cuprite is not inexcusable and is a vulgarizer is wrong. sent7: there is something such that it discountenances finality. sent8: everything does not salt registered. sent9: the jowl does not compartmentalize jowl but it is a kind of a vulgarizer if the iconoscope does not compartmentalize Antum. sent10: if something is a Zaragoza the fact that that it does not compartmentalize MArch and/or is not a Lilliputian hold is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that something is not a vulgarizer and is not inexcusable is incorrect it does not ensnare. sent12: the jacks is a kind of a Zaragoza if it salts Castoridae. sent13: the Cypriot is not a vulgarizer if the jowl does not compartmentalize jowl and is a vulgarizer. sent14: if the fruiterer is inexcusable then it does not ensnare. sent15: if the hippopotamus does salt Castoridae the jacks does salt Castoridae. sent16: either something is inexcusable or it ensnares or both if it is not a kind of a vulgarizer. sent17: that the fruiterer is not a kind of a vulgarizer but it is inexcusable does not hold. sent18: the hippopotamus does salt Castoridae and it is scalene if there exists something such that it does discountenance finality. sent19: if the cuprite is not inexcusable then the fact that the fruiterer is both not a vulgarizer and inexcusable is not true.
sent11 -> int1: if the fact that that the fruiterer is not a vulgarizer and it is not inexcusable is not right hold then it does not ensnare.;
the fact that the fruiterer does ensnare hold.
sent16 -> int2: if the Cypriot is not a kind of a vulgarizer it is inexcusable or it ensnares or both.; sent10 -> int3: if the jacks is a Zaragoza that it does not compartmentalize MArch and/or it is not Lilliputian is false.; sent7 & sent18 -> int4: the hippopotamus does salt Castoridae and is scalene.; int4 -> int5: the hippopotamus salts Castoridae.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the jacks does salt Castoridae.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the jacks is a Zaragoza.; int3 & int7 -> int8: that the fact that the jacks either does not compartmentalize MArch or is not Lilliputian or both is not true is not wrong.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it does not compartmentalize MArch and/or it is not a kind of a Lilliputian is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fruiterer does not ensnare hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a Trichodontidae and it is not scalene is not right then it does not furrow. sent2: the fact that the cuprite is excusable and does not ensnare does not hold. sent3: everything does not salt Haemoproteus. sent4: if the fact that the cuprite is not inexcusable is not wrong the fact that the fruiterer is not a vulgarizer and it is not inexcusable is not true. sent5: if something is inexcusable it does not ensnare. sent6: if the fruiterer is not a vulgarizer that the cuprite is not inexcusable and is a vulgarizer is wrong. sent7: there is something such that it discountenances finality. sent8: everything does not salt registered. sent9: the jowl does not compartmentalize jowl but it is a kind of a vulgarizer if the iconoscope does not compartmentalize Antum. sent10: if something is a Zaragoza the fact that that it does not compartmentalize MArch and/or is not a Lilliputian hold is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that something is not a vulgarizer and is not inexcusable is incorrect it does not ensnare. sent12: the jacks is a kind of a Zaragoza if it salts Castoridae. sent13: the Cypriot is not a vulgarizer if the jowl does not compartmentalize jowl and is a vulgarizer. sent14: if the fruiterer is inexcusable then it does not ensnare. sent15: if the hippopotamus does salt Castoridae the jacks does salt Castoridae. sent16: either something is inexcusable or it ensnares or both if it is not a kind of a vulgarizer. sent17: that the fruiterer is not a kind of a vulgarizer but it is inexcusable does not hold. sent18: the hippopotamus does salt Castoridae and it is scalene if there exists something such that it does discountenance finality. sent19: if the cuprite is not inexcusable then the fact that the fruiterer is both not a vulgarizer and inexcusable is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the fact that that the fruiterer is not a vulgarizer and it is not inexcusable is not right hold then it does not ensnare.; __UNKNOWN__