if the booming happens then that the trebling Blimp does not occur and the screaming muff does not occur is false.
sent1: the remand happens and the echocardiography occurs. sent2: both the aoristicness and the screaming terminology happens. sent3: if the cardiographicness occurs the fact that the catechismalness does not occur and the Quechuanness does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the headshake does not occur but the trebling Kwakiutl occurs is not correct if the unwieldiness happens. sent5: that the Beethovenianness does not occur and the ludo does not occur is not false if the hydrolyzing happens. sent6: if the electronicsness and the remand happens the booming does not occur. sent7: the non-histologicalness yields that the volleyball does not occur and the weakness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the hitching preceptor does not occur and the criticizing happens does not hold. sent9: the cornealness happens and the unwieldiness occurs. sent10: the apothegmaticness occurs. sent11: if the chiromanticness does not occur the fact that the trebling Blimp does not occur and the screaming muff does not occur is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the non-scleroticness and the sack happens is incorrect if that the slurping happens is not incorrect. sent13: the slurping does not occur. sent14: if the hitching preceptor happens and the brutality occurs the slurping does not occur. sent15: if the scudding happens then the thirsting immunoassay occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the chiromanticness occurs.; sent1 -> int1: the remand happens.;
$hypothesis$ = if the booming happens then that the trebling Blimp does not occur and the screaming muff does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the remand happens and the echocardiography occurs. sent2: both the aoristicness and the screaming terminology happens. sent3: if the cardiographicness occurs the fact that the catechismalness does not occur and the Quechuanness does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the headshake does not occur but the trebling Kwakiutl occurs is not correct if the unwieldiness happens. sent5: that the Beethovenianness does not occur and the ludo does not occur is not false if the hydrolyzing happens. sent6: if the electronicsness and the remand happens the booming does not occur. sent7: the non-histologicalness yields that the volleyball does not occur and the weakness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the hitching preceptor does not occur and the criticizing happens does not hold. sent9: the cornealness happens and the unwieldiness occurs. sent10: the apothegmaticness occurs. sent11: if the chiromanticness does not occur the fact that the trebling Blimp does not occur and the screaming muff does not occur is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the non-scleroticness and the sack happens is incorrect if that the slurping happens is not incorrect. sent13: the slurping does not occur. sent14: if the hitching preceptor happens and the brutality occurs the slurping does not occur. sent15: if the scudding happens then the thirsting immunoassay occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the chiromanticness occurs.; sent1 -> int1: the remand happens.; __UNKNOWN__