the fact that the petty does not occur hold.
sent1: that the diminishing Magritte and the diminishing Pepin happens yields that the petty does not occur. sent2: the diminishing Magritte and the apheticness occurs. sent3: if the apheticness does not occur and the diminishing Magritte does not occur then the petty happens. sent4: the fact that the recharging does not occur and the diminishing Pepin does not occur is not true. sent5: if that the recharging does not occur and the diminishing Pepin does not occur is not right then the diminishing Pepin happens. sent6: if the fact that the non-acyclicness and the requisition occurs is not correct then the apheticness does not occur.
sent2 -> int1: the diminishing Magritte occurs.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the diminishing Pepin occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the diminishing Magritte and the diminishing Pepin occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the petty happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the petty does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the diminishing Magritte and the diminishing Pepin happens yields that the petty does not occur. sent2: the diminishing Magritte and the apheticness occurs. sent3: if the apheticness does not occur and the diminishing Magritte does not occur then the petty happens. sent4: the fact that the recharging does not occur and the diminishing Pepin does not occur is not true. sent5: if that the recharging does not occur and the diminishing Pepin does not occur is not right then the diminishing Pepin happens. sent6: if the fact that the non-acyclicness and the requisition occurs is not correct then the apheticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the diminishing Magritte occurs.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the diminishing Pepin occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the diminishing Magritte and the diminishing Pepin occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__