the fact that both the non-blastodermaticness and the jawlessness occurs is false.
sent1: the fact that the blastodermaticness and the Sin happens is not true if the staleness does not occur. sent2: the blastodermaticness does not occur. sent3: that the Sin does not occur is true. sent4: the exculpation occurs. sent5: if the Sin does not occur the bathymetricness happens. sent6: if the exculpation occurs the staling does not occur. sent7: the dropkicking worthiness is prevented by that the non-Gibraltarianness and the non-alchemisticness occurs. sent8: if the Sin does not occur not the substantiating but the bathymetricness occurs. sent9: that both the non-Gibraltarianness and the alchemisticness occurs prevents the jawedness. sent10: if the exculpation happens the alchemisticness but not the staling happens. sent11: if the Gibraltarian happens that the substantiating does not occur but the bathymetricness happens is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Gibraltarianness happens hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the substantiating does not occur but the bathymetricness happens is not true.; sent8 & sent3 -> int2: not the substantiating but the bathymetricness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Gibraltarianness does not occur.; sent10 & sent4 -> int5: the alchemisticness but not the staleness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the alchemisticness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: both the non-Gibraltarianness and the alchemisticness occurs.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the jawlessness happens.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the dropkicking worthiness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the non-blastodermaticness and the jawlessness occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the blastodermaticness and the Sin happens is not true if the staleness does not occur. sent2: the blastodermaticness does not occur. sent3: that the Sin does not occur is true. sent4: the exculpation occurs. sent5: if the Sin does not occur the bathymetricness happens. sent6: if the exculpation occurs the staling does not occur. sent7: the dropkicking worthiness is prevented by that the non-Gibraltarianness and the non-alchemisticness occurs. sent8: if the Sin does not occur not the substantiating but the bathymetricness occurs. sent9: that both the non-Gibraltarianness and the alchemisticness occurs prevents the jawedness. sent10: if the exculpation happens the alchemisticness but not the staling happens. sent11: if the Gibraltarian happens that the substantiating does not occur but the bathymetricness happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Gibraltarianness happens hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the substantiating does not occur but the bathymetricness happens is not true.; sent8 & sent3 -> int2: not the substantiating but the bathymetricness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Gibraltarianness does not occur.; sent10 & sent4 -> int5: the alchemisticness but not the staleness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the alchemisticness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: both the non-Gibraltarianness and the alchemisticness occurs.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the jawlessness happens.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__