that the wardroom is not a Yevtushenko is not incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that it is apocalyptic. sent2: a non-persistent thing is a kind of a Yevtushenko that is a kind of a cliffhanger. sent3: that the columnist is penumbral thing that is persistent is not true. sent4: that the Hindustani is a estazolam and it is erecting does not hold if something is apocalyptic. sent5: if the pecan is not a naprapath the fact that the skeleton is a kind of a naprapath that is not a estazolam is not correct. sent6: if the hutch is a cliffhanger that the columnist is not persistent and not a Yevtushenko is false. sent7: if something traffics descendants that it is not a kind of a cliffhanger and it is not penumbral is not right. sent8: something is a cliffhanger if the fact that it is not a cliffhanger and it is not penumbral is not right. sent9: that the hutch does not traffic descendants is true if the columnist is persistent. sent10: that the Hindustani is a kind of a naprapath and is penumbral is incorrect. sent11: the wardroom is a cliffhanger if it is a kind of a Yevtushenko. sent12: that the columnist traffics descendants but it is not persistent does not hold if the hutch does not traffics descendants. sent13: if that something is a Yevtushenko but it is not penumbral does not hold then it does not traffic descendants. sent14: the fact that the pecan is not a naprapath is true if the fact that that the Hindustani does not traffic descendants but it is penumbral is not wrong does not hold. sent15: something is not a naprapath if that it is penumbral and it does not traffic descendants does not hold. sent16: something does not traffic descendants if it is a kind of a estazolam. sent17: if that the Hindustani is a kind of a estazolam and it is erecting is wrong then the hutch is not a Methodist. sent18: the fact that the skeleton is Methodist is not wrong. sent19: if the wardroom is a cliffhanger the columnist is persistent. sent20: something is not a Methodist if the fact that it is a kind of a naprapath and it is not a estazolam does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wardroom is a Yevtushenko.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the wardroom is a kind of a cliffhanger.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the columnist is persistent.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the hutch does not traffic descendants.; sent20 -> int4: the skeleton is not a Methodist if that it is a kind of a naprapath that is not a estazolam does not hold.;
the wardroom is a Yevtushenko.
sent8 -> int5: if the fact that the hutch is not a kind of a cliffhanger and it is not penumbral is not right then it is a cliffhanger.; sent7 -> int6: that if the hutch does traffic descendants then that the hutch is not a cliffhanger and not penumbral does not hold is right.; sent1 & sent4 -> int7: that the fact that the Hindustani is a kind of a estazolam and is erecting does not hold is not incorrect.; sent17 & int7 -> int8: the hutch is not Methodist.;
$hypothesis$ = that the wardroom is not a Yevtushenko is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is apocalyptic. sent2: a non-persistent thing is a kind of a Yevtushenko that is a kind of a cliffhanger. sent3: that the columnist is penumbral thing that is persistent is not true. sent4: that the Hindustani is a estazolam and it is erecting does not hold if something is apocalyptic. sent5: if the pecan is not a naprapath the fact that the skeleton is a kind of a naprapath that is not a estazolam is not correct. sent6: if the hutch is a cliffhanger that the columnist is not persistent and not a Yevtushenko is false. sent7: if something traffics descendants that it is not a kind of a cliffhanger and it is not penumbral is not right. sent8: something is a cliffhanger if the fact that it is not a cliffhanger and it is not penumbral is not right. sent9: that the hutch does not traffic descendants is true if the columnist is persistent. sent10: that the Hindustani is a kind of a naprapath and is penumbral is incorrect. sent11: the wardroom is a cliffhanger if it is a kind of a Yevtushenko. sent12: that the columnist traffics descendants but it is not persistent does not hold if the hutch does not traffics descendants. sent13: if that something is a Yevtushenko but it is not penumbral does not hold then it does not traffic descendants. sent14: the fact that the pecan is not a naprapath is true if the fact that that the Hindustani does not traffic descendants but it is penumbral is not wrong does not hold. sent15: something is not a naprapath if that it is penumbral and it does not traffic descendants does not hold. sent16: something does not traffic descendants if it is a kind of a estazolam. sent17: if that the Hindustani is a kind of a estazolam and it is erecting is wrong then the hutch is not a Methodist. sent18: the fact that the skeleton is Methodist is not wrong. sent19: if the wardroom is a cliffhanger the columnist is persistent. sent20: something is not a Methodist if the fact that it is a kind of a naprapath and it is not a estazolam does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wardroom is a Yevtushenko.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the wardroom is a kind of a cliffhanger.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the columnist is persistent.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the hutch does not traffic descendants.; sent20 -> int4: the skeleton is not a Methodist if that it is a kind of a naprapath that is not a estazolam does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__