there exists something such that if it is not abundant that it does not outsell cinnamon and it is osseous is false.
sent1: if the cinnamon is not abundant then it does not outsell cinnamon and it is osseous. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of inarticulate thing that is a kind of a limb is not correct if it is not incommodious. sent3: if something is not a Loxostege that it is not a dissolve and it is a bulrush is wrong. sent4: that something does outsell cinnamon and it is osseous is false if it is not abundant. sent5: that the alphabetizer does not outsell gamble but it does outsell cinnamon is incorrect if it is not contralateral. sent6: that something does not mold Cuculus and is a broad-mindedness is wrong if it is not Peruvian. sent7: the fact that something does not outsell cinnamon and is osseous is not correct if it is abundant. sent8: there is something such that if it is not abundant then the fact that it does outsell cinnamon and it is osseous is not true. sent9: if the cinnamon is not abundant the fact that it does outsell cinnamon and is osseous is not right. sent10: that the cinnamon does not outsell cinnamon but it is osseous is wrong if it is abundant. sent11: the fact that the cinnamon is not alienable but a tabor is false if it does not outsell cinnamon. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not abundant it does not outsell cinnamon and is osseous. sent13: there is something such that if it is not Nazi then the fact that it does not shillyshally Fechner and depends is wrong. sent14: that something does not outsell cinnamon but it is osseous if it is not abundant is true. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is abundant is right that it does not outsell cinnamon and is not non-osseous is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not abundant that it does not outsell cinnamon and it is osseous is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cinnamon is not abundant then it does not outsell cinnamon and it is osseous. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of inarticulate thing that is a kind of a limb is not correct if it is not incommodious. sent3: if something is not a Loxostege that it is not a dissolve and it is a bulrush is wrong. sent4: that something does outsell cinnamon and it is osseous is false if it is not abundant. sent5: that the alphabetizer does not outsell gamble but it does outsell cinnamon is incorrect if it is not contralateral. sent6: that something does not mold Cuculus and is a broad-mindedness is wrong if it is not Peruvian. sent7: the fact that something does not outsell cinnamon and is osseous is not correct if it is abundant. sent8: there is something such that if it is not abundant then the fact that it does outsell cinnamon and it is osseous is not true. sent9: if the cinnamon is not abundant the fact that it does outsell cinnamon and is osseous is not right. sent10: that the cinnamon does not outsell cinnamon but it is osseous is wrong if it is abundant. sent11: the fact that the cinnamon is not alienable but a tabor is false if it does not outsell cinnamon. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not abundant it does not outsell cinnamon and is osseous. sent13: there is something such that if it is not Nazi then the fact that it does not shillyshally Fechner and depends is wrong. sent14: that something does not outsell cinnamon but it is osseous if it is not abundant is true. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is abundant is right that it does not outsell cinnamon and is not non-osseous is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__