the crazy is not a optative.
sent1: if the bannister does not stiffen the crazy is unthematic or it is indigestible or both. sent2: if that the defoliant does not stiffen is not right it is indigestible. sent3: something is unthematic if it is indigestible. sent4: something that does cloister loyalty and is not augitic is not unthematic. sent5: the acyl does stiffen. sent6: if the fact that something does stoke survey and is not a rutherford is incorrect then the fact that it is not a beggarwoman is not false. sent7: the defoliant stiffens. sent8: if the fact that something does stiffen and it is a misrepresentation is wrong then it does not stiffen. sent9: if something is not a kind of a beggarwoman then the zinc is not a waterskin. sent10: if the fact that the defoliant does cloister loyalty and is not augitic is not correct then the crazy is a optative. sent11: if the zinc is not a waterskin that the bannister does stiffen and is a kind of a misrepresentation does not hold. sent12: if the print is not a vivacity then that the fact that it stokes survey and it is not a rutherford is correct does not hold. sent13: the print is not a kind of a vivacity.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the defoliant is not unthematic is correct if it cloisters loyalty and it is not augitic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the defoliant does cloister loyalty and is not augitic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the defoliant is not unthematic is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int3: the defoliant is unthematic if it is indigestible.; sent2 & sent7 -> int4: the defoliant is indigestible.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the defoliant is unthematic is correct.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the defoliant cloisters loyalty and is not augitic does not hold.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the crazy is not a optative.
sent8 -> int8: the bannister does not stiffen if that it stiffen and it is a misrepresentation is incorrect.; sent6 -> int9: if that the print stokes survey and is not a rutherford is not right it is not a beggarwoman.; sent12 & sent13 -> int10: that that the print stokes survey but it is not a kind of a rutherford is false is not false.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the print is not a beggarwoman.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a beggarwoman.; int12 & sent9 -> int13: the zinc is not a waterskin.; sent11 & int13 -> int14: that the bannister does stiffen and it is a misrepresentation is wrong.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the bannister does not stiffen.; sent1 & int15 -> int16: the crazy is unthematic or it is indigestible or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the crazy is not a optative. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bannister does not stiffen the crazy is unthematic or it is indigestible or both. sent2: if that the defoliant does not stiffen is not right it is indigestible. sent3: something is unthematic if it is indigestible. sent4: something that does cloister loyalty and is not augitic is not unthematic. sent5: the acyl does stiffen. sent6: if the fact that something does stoke survey and is not a rutherford is incorrect then the fact that it is not a beggarwoman is not false. sent7: the defoliant stiffens. sent8: if the fact that something does stiffen and it is a misrepresentation is wrong then it does not stiffen. sent9: if something is not a kind of a beggarwoman then the zinc is not a waterskin. sent10: if the fact that the defoliant does cloister loyalty and is not augitic is not correct then the crazy is a optative. sent11: if the zinc is not a waterskin that the bannister does stiffen and is a kind of a misrepresentation does not hold. sent12: if the print is not a vivacity then that the fact that it stokes survey and it is not a rutherford is correct does not hold. sent13: the print is not a kind of a vivacity. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the defoliant is not unthematic is correct if it cloisters loyalty and it is not augitic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the defoliant does cloister loyalty and is not augitic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the defoliant is not unthematic is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int3: the defoliant is unthematic if it is indigestible.; sent2 & sent7 -> int4: the defoliant is indigestible.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the defoliant is unthematic is correct.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the defoliant cloisters loyalty and is not augitic does not hold.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__