the parasol is not priestly but it is a kind of a Xavier.
sent1: if that either the Phoebe does finger or it does not strand homospory or both is not correct then the fact that it is not a dispute is not incorrect. sent2: the Greek does not continue but it is Melanesian. sent3: the parasol is not priestly. sent4: the Greek is not hydroelectric. sent5: there exists nothing that is both non-monocarpic and ceric. sent6: if the Phoebe is not an overhead and it is not ceric the parasol is ceric. sent7: the Irish is not ceric. sent8: if that the parasol is not a Xavier is not incorrect the fact that either the Phoebe is a finger or it does not strand homospory or both is not correct. sent9: the Phoebe is not a booklet but a bilges. sent10: if the fugleman is not a dispute and it does not strand homospory then the Phoebe is ceric. sent11: if the Irish is a Anhingidae then it is an overhead. sent12: if something is not a Anhingidae it is not overhead and not ceric. sent13: that something is not priestly but a Xavier does not hold if it is not a dispute. sent14: that the fact that the Irish continues and/or it is not Melanesian is incorrect is right if the Greek is not a Anhingidae. sent15: the parasol does not finger. sent16: if that that something is not a dispute and is a Xavier is correct is not correct it is a dispute. sent17: the fugleman is not priestly. sent18: the parasol does not subtilize frightfulness. sent19: if the Irish is an overhead then the Greek continues. sent20: something is not a dispute and it is not monocarpic if it is ceric. sent21: if the parasol is not an overhead the Irish is a kind of a Xavier. sent22: if the Greek is not a kind of a Xavier then the fact that the Phoebe is Melanesian and/or it is not a finger does not hold. sent23: if the fugleman is not monocarpic and it is not ceric then the Irish is a kind of a Anhingidae.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the parasol is not a Xavier.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that either the Phoebe fingers or it does not strand homospory or both is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Phoebe is not a dispute.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the Greek does not continue is right.;
that the parasol is unpriestly thing that is a Xavier is not true.
sent13 -> int4: that the parasol is not priestly but it is a Xavier is not right if it is not a dispute.; sent20 -> int5: if the parasol is ceric it is not a dispute and it is not monocarpic.; sent12 -> int6: if the Phoebe is not a kind of a Anhingidae it is non-overhead and is not ceric.;
$hypothesis$ = the parasol is not priestly but it is a kind of a Xavier. ; $context$ = sent1: if that either the Phoebe does finger or it does not strand homospory or both is not correct then the fact that it is not a dispute is not incorrect. sent2: the Greek does not continue but it is Melanesian. sent3: the parasol is not priestly. sent4: the Greek is not hydroelectric. sent5: there exists nothing that is both non-monocarpic and ceric. sent6: if the Phoebe is not an overhead and it is not ceric the parasol is ceric. sent7: the Irish is not ceric. sent8: if that the parasol is not a Xavier is not incorrect the fact that either the Phoebe is a finger or it does not strand homospory or both is not correct. sent9: the Phoebe is not a booklet but a bilges. sent10: if the fugleman is not a dispute and it does not strand homospory then the Phoebe is ceric. sent11: if the Irish is a Anhingidae then it is an overhead. sent12: if something is not a Anhingidae it is not overhead and not ceric. sent13: that something is not priestly but a Xavier does not hold if it is not a dispute. sent14: that the fact that the Irish continues and/or it is not Melanesian is incorrect is right if the Greek is not a Anhingidae. sent15: the parasol does not finger. sent16: if that that something is not a dispute and is a Xavier is correct is not correct it is a dispute. sent17: the fugleman is not priestly. sent18: the parasol does not subtilize frightfulness. sent19: if the Irish is an overhead then the Greek continues. sent20: something is not a dispute and it is not monocarpic if it is ceric. sent21: if the parasol is not an overhead the Irish is a kind of a Xavier. sent22: if the Greek is not a kind of a Xavier then the fact that the Phoebe is Melanesian and/or it is not a finger does not hold. sent23: if the fugleman is not monocarpic and it is not ceric then the Irish is a kind of a Anhingidae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the parasol is not a Xavier.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that either the Phoebe fingers or it does not strand homospory or both is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Phoebe is not a dispute.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the Greek does not continue is right.; __UNKNOWN__