the watercannon is non-isometric thing that does nail.
sent1: if the watercannon is Einsteinian then it is not isometric and it nails. sent2: if the Cornish is not a caraway then that the watercannon is a caraway but it does not tweeze deodar is incorrect. sent3: the fact that if the fact that the miniskirt is not migratory is not false then the miniskirt is not a kind of an exigency and is not a despondency is not incorrect. sent4: the miniskirt tweezes deodar. sent5: the fatso is not cyanobacterial if the miniskirt is both not an exigency and not a despondency. sent6: the Cornish is a caraway that tweezes electrolyte. sent7: if the fatso is not a kind of a shave the fact that the watercannon is not a kind of a shave and it does not tweeze deodar does not hold. sent8: the Cornish is not a caraway if the fatso is a shave but it is non-cyanobacterial. sent9: the fact that that the miniskirt is migratory is not false is incorrect. sent10: the Cornish is a shave.
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the miniskirt is not an exigency and not a despondency.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fatso is not cyanobacterial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fatso is a shave.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the fatso is both a shave and not cyanobacterial.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the Cornish is not a caraway.; sent6 -> int5: the Cornish is a caraway.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fatso does not shave.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: that the watercannon is not a shave and it does not tweeze deodar does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the watercannon is non-isometric thing that does nail. ; $context$ = sent1: if the watercannon is Einsteinian then it is not isometric and it nails. sent2: if the Cornish is not a caraway then that the watercannon is a caraway but it does not tweeze deodar is incorrect. sent3: the fact that if the fact that the miniskirt is not migratory is not false then the miniskirt is not a kind of an exigency and is not a despondency is not incorrect. sent4: the miniskirt tweezes deodar. sent5: the fatso is not cyanobacterial if the miniskirt is both not an exigency and not a despondency. sent6: the Cornish is a caraway that tweezes electrolyte. sent7: if the fatso is not a kind of a shave the fact that the watercannon is not a kind of a shave and it does not tweeze deodar does not hold. sent8: the Cornish is not a caraway if the fatso is a shave but it is non-cyanobacterial. sent9: the fact that that the miniskirt is migratory is not false is incorrect. sent10: the Cornish is a shave. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the miniskirt is not an exigency and not a despondency.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fatso is not cyanobacterial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fatso is a shave.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the fatso is both a shave and not cyanobacterial.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the Cornish is not a caraway.; sent6 -> int5: the Cornish is a caraway.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fatso does not shave.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: that the watercannon is not a shave and it does not tweeze deodar does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__