there is something such that if it is not a one-step then that it is a lung and it is not a frostiness is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it does not refrain glucosamine then that it breaststrokes and it does not circularize slaveholder is not correct. sent2: if the lutefisk is nonabsorbent then the fact that it is protestant and it is not a one-step is not correct. sent3: something is a lung but it is not a frostiness if it is not a one-step. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a oxytetracycline the fact that it refrains Seymour and it does not photostat minesweeper is not right. sent5: that something is ill but it is not valuable is not right if it does not photostat Monongahela. sent6: if something does not one-step then the fact that it is a lung and it is a frostiness is not true. sent7: the lutefisk is a lung but it is not a frostiness if it is not a one-step. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a one-step then it is both a lung and not a frostiness. sent9: if the lutefisk is not a one-step that it is a lung and is a frostiness does not hold. sent10: something that is not a kind of a Veneridae is involuntary and does not refrain bootlace. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not involuntary that it is calendric and is not a Jeffersonian is not right. sent12: the fact that something is a halfpennyworth but it is not an oatmeal does not hold if it is a Creole. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not circularize Peleus then that it is ill and it does not cavil is not right. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a diuretic that it is telephonic and it is not tectonics is false. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a one-step then that it is a lung and it is a frostiness is not true.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a one-step then that it is a lung and it is not a frostiness is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not refrain glucosamine then that it breaststrokes and it does not circularize slaveholder is not correct. sent2: if the lutefisk is nonabsorbent then the fact that it is protestant and it is not a one-step is not correct. sent3: something is a lung but it is not a frostiness if it is not a one-step. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a oxytetracycline the fact that it refrains Seymour and it does not photostat minesweeper is not right. sent5: that something is ill but it is not valuable is not right if it does not photostat Monongahela. sent6: if something does not one-step then the fact that it is a lung and it is a frostiness is not true. sent7: the lutefisk is a lung but it is not a frostiness if it is not a one-step. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a one-step then it is both a lung and not a frostiness. sent9: if the lutefisk is not a one-step that it is a lung and is a frostiness does not hold. sent10: something that is not a kind of a Veneridae is involuntary and does not refrain bootlace. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not involuntary that it is calendric and is not a Jeffersonian is not right. sent12: the fact that something is a halfpennyworth but it is not an oatmeal does not hold if it is a Creole. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not circularize Peleus then that it is ill and it does not cavil is not right. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a diuretic that it is telephonic and it is not tectonics is false. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a one-step then that it is a lung and it is a frostiness is not true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__