that there exists something such that if that it is exegetic is not incorrect it is non-possessive thing that is not seamless is false.
sent1: there is something such that if it is exegetic it is not seamless. sent2: there exists something such that if it is exegetic it is not possessive and it is seamless. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a clast then it does not peep bilaterality and is not digital. sent4: something that is discordant is a kind of non-Beethovenian thing that does not photostat scanner. sent5: if the boll is exegetic then it is non-possessive thing that is not seamless.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is discordant then it is non-Beethovenian thing that does not photostat scanner.
sent4 -> int1: if the thulium is discordant then it is not Beethovenian and does not photostat scanner.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it is exegetic is not incorrect it is non-possessive thing that is not seamless is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is exegetic it is not seamless. sent2: there exists something such that if it is exegetic it is not possessive and it is seamless. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a clast then it does not peep bilaterality and is not digital. sent4: something that is discordant is a kind of non-Beethovenian thing that does not photostat scanner. sent5: if the boll is exegetic then it is non-possessive thing that is not seamless. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__