that the musculature is a kind of a kludge and is not a dilator does not hold.
sent1: if something is not a suspensory then the fact that it is a prostitution and it is not a kludge is incorrect. sent2: the armhole is a suspensory. sent3: if the armhole is a cattail the boxcar is not a kludge. sent4: if the fact that the boxcar is not a kind of a kludge is not wrong that the musculature is a kind of a kludge and is a dilator is false. sent5: if something is not a suspensory it is a kludge and it is not a dilator. sent6: the fact that the musculature is a kludge but it is not a cattail is false if the boxcar is not a kludge. sent7: if something that is a kind of a cattail is not a saveloy it is not a suspensory. sent8: if the musculature is not a suspensory then that the armhole is a kind of a suspensory and it is a kludge is not correct. sent9: if the boxcar is not a kind of a kludge the fact that the musculature is a kludge that is not a dilator is not correct. sent10: the armhole is not a kludge if the boxcar is a dilator and/or is a kind of a cattail. sent11: there exists nothing such that it is not a dilator and not unsarcastic. sent12: the fact that the musculature is a kind of a kludge that is a kind of a dilator is incorrect. sent13: if the musculature is not a kludge then the fact that the boxcar is a kludge but it is not a dilator is incorrect. sent14: something is a cattail but it is not a saveloy if it is a dilator.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the armhole is a suspensory or is a kind of a cattail or both is not wrong.;
that the lector is a prostitution and is not a kind of a kludge is not correct.
sent1 -> int2: if the lector is not a suspensory then the fact that it is a kind of a prostitution that is not a kludge is incorrect.; sent7 -> int3: that the lector is not a kind of a suspensory is not false if it is a kind of a cattail and it is not a saveloy.; sent14 -> int4: if the lector is a dilator it is a cattail and it is not a saveloy.; sent11 -> int5: the fact that the armhole is both not a dilator and not unsarcastic is not right.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a dilator and not unsarcastic is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the musculature is a kind of a kludge and is not a dilator does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a suspensory then the fact that it is a prostitution and it is not a kludge is incorrect. sent2: the armhole is a suspensory. sent3: if the armhole is a cattail the boxcar is not a kludge. sent4: if the fact that the boxcar is not a kind of a kludge is not wrong that the musculature is a kind of a kludge and is a dilator is false. sent5: if something is not a suspensory it is a kludge and it is not a dilator. sent6: the fact that the musculature is a kludge but it is not a cattail is false if the boxcar is not a kludge. sent7: if something that is a kind of a cattail is not a saveloy it is not a suspensory. sent8: if the musculature is not a suspensory then that the armhole is a kind of a suspensory and it is a kludge is not correct. sent9: if the boxcar is not a kind of a kludge the fact that the musculature is a kludge that is not a dilator is not correct. sent10: the armhole is not a kludge if the boxcar is a dilator and/or is a kind of a cattail. sent11: there exists nothing such that it is not a dilator and not unsarcastic. sent12: the fact that the musculature is a kind of a kludge that is a kind of a dilator is incorrect. sent13: if the musculature is not a kludge then the fact that the boxcar is a kludge but it is not a dilator is incorrect. sent14: something is a cattail but it is not a saveloy if it is a dilator. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the armhole is a suspensory or is a kind of a cattail or both is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__