if the burglarizing ED does not occur the fact that the fact that the wings does not occur and the stemming does not occur is not true is not incorrect.
sent1: if the jug happens the orchestrating cuisse happens. sent2: the non-postmodernistness and the non-atypicalness happens if the wings occurs. sent3: the trigonometricness does not occur. sent4: the zakat does not occur. sent5: the stocktaking does not occur. sent6: the hungering demotion does not occur. sent7: that the wings but not the stem occurs does not hold if the burglarizing ED does not occur. sent8: the orchestrating Frankfort occurs. sent9: that the superannuation occurs but the skip does not occur is false. sent10: the stud brings about that the hungering Platanistidae occurs. sent11: that the burglarizing ED does not occur brings about that that the wings does not occur and the stemming does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the abundantness does not occur and the orchestrating justification does not occur. sent13: the fact that the wings does not occur and the stem occurs is not true. sent14: that the preparing does not occur and the obstruction does not occur is not true. sent15: the fact that the Shuhaness but not the initiating occurs is not true. sent16: the fact that the wings does not occur and the stemming does not occur is not true if the burglarizing ED occurs. sent17: the burglarizing single occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wings does not occur and the stemming does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the wings does not occur.;
both the non-postmodernistness and the non-atypicalness happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the burglarizing ED does not occur the fact that the fact that the wings does not occur and the stemming does not occur is not true is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the jug happens the orchestrating cuisse happens. sent2: the non-postmodernistness and the non-atypicalness happens if the wings occurs. sent3: the trigonometricness does not occur. sent4: the zakat does not occur. sent5: the stocktaking does not occur. sent6: the hungering demotion does not occur. sent7: that the wings but not the stem occurs does not hold if the burglarizing ED does not occur. sent8: the orchestrating Frankfort occurs. sent9: that the superannuation occurs but the skip does not occur is false. sent10: the stud brings about that the hungering Platanistidae occurs. sent11: that the burglarizing ED does not occur brings about that that the wings does not occur and the stemming does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the abundantness does not occur and the orchestrating justification does not occur. sent13: the fact that the wings does not occur and the stem occurs is not true. sent14: that the preparing does not occur and the obstruction does not occur is not true. sent15: the fact that the Shuhaness but not the initiating occurs is not true. sent16: the fact that the wings does not occur and the stemming does not occur is not true if the burglarizing ED occurs. sent17: the burglarizing single occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wings does not occur and the stemming does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the wings does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__