if the unableness occurs then both the urticating endoscopy and the clearness happens.
sent1: the fact that the three-pieceness does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: if the unableness occurs then the entr'acte does not occur and the unclearness does not occur. sent3: the humaneness does not occur. sent4: the danger happens. sent5: if that the three-pieceness does not occur is not wrong then both the danger and the urticating endoscopy happens. sent6: that the urticating endoscopy does not occur leads to that the Court occurs and the unableness occurs. sent7: the entr'acte does not occur. sent8: if the urticating mezzotint occurs the ungualness but not the Hero occurs. sent9: the pilgrimage occurs but the inhibition does not occur. sent10: if the unableness happens the entr'acte does not occur. sent11: that the danger occurs is not incorrect if the three-pieceness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unableness happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the entr'acte does not occur and the unclearness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the unclearness does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the danger and the urticating endoscopy occurs.; int3 -> int4: the urticating endoscopy occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the urticating endoscopy but not the unclearness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the Court occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the unableness occurs then both the urticating endoscopy and the clearness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the three-pieceness does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: if the unableness occurs then the entr'acte does not occur and the unclearness does not occur. sent3: the humaneness does not occur. sent4: the danger happens. sent5: if that the three-pieceness does not occur is not wrong then both the danger and the urticating endoscopy happens. sent6: that the urticating endoscopy does not occur leads to that the Court occurs and the unableness occurs. sent7: the entr'acte does not occur. sent8: if the urticating mezzotint occurs the ungualness but not the Hero occurs. sent9: the pilgrimage occurs but the inhibition does not occur. sent10: if the unableness happens the entr'acte does not occur. sent11: that the danger occurs is not incorrect if the three-pieceness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unableness happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the entr'acte does not occur and the unclearness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the unclearness does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the danger and the urticating endoscopy occurs.; int3 -> int4: the urticating endoscopy occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the urticating endoscopy but not the unclearness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__