the copout does not occur and the rejoinder occurs.
sent1: the fact that the undergrowing does not occur and the unfrozenness does not occur is false if the birth does not occur. sent2: the hashing yard does not occur. sent3: the PMS happens. sent4: the opposing XY does not occur. sent5: the rejoinder occurs if the fact that the shoplifting does not occur and the rejoinder does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the fact that the shoplifting does not occur and the rejoinder does not occur does not hold if the hashing yard does not occur is right. sent7: if the debridement occurs that the copout does not occur and the rejoinder occurs does not hold. sent8: if the debridement does not occur the teasing does not occur and the converging does not occur. sent9: the dealing happens. sent10: the bonding does not occur. sent11: if that the coexisting does not occur and the hashing confectioner does not occur does not hold then the hashing yard happens. sent12: the copout does not occur if the teasing does not occur and the converging occurs. sent13: that not the shoplifting but the rejoinder happens is not true if the hashing yard does not occur. sent14: the debridement does not occur. sent15: the viceregalness does not occur and the hashing Djiboutian happens. sent16: if the hashing yard happens then that the shoplifting occurs and the debridement does not occur is not correct. sent17: the fact that the bust-up does not occur but the kindness happens is not correct. sent18: the bankruptcy does not occur.
sent8 & sent14 -> int1: the teasing does not occur and the converging does not occur.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the shoplifting does not occur and the rejoinder does not occur is not right.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the rejoinder happens.;
the fact that not the copout but the rejoinder happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the copout does not occur and the rejoinder occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the undergrowing does not occur and the unfrozenness does not occur is false if the birth does not occur. sent2: the hashing yard does not occur. sent3: the PMS happens. sent4: the opposing XY does not occur. sent5: the rejoinder occurs if the fact that the shoplifting does not occur and the rejoinder does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the fact that the shoplifting does not occur and the rejoinder does not occur does not hold if the hashing yard does not occur is right. sent7: if the debridement occurs that the copout does not occur and the rejoinder occurs does not hold. sent8: if the debridement does not occur the teasing does not occur and the converging does not occur. sent9: the dealing happens. sent10: the bonding does not occur. sent11: if that the coexisting does not occur and the hashing confectioner does not occur does not hold then the hashing yard happens. sent12: the copout does not occur if the teasing does not occur and the converging occurs. sent13: that not the shoplifting but the rejoinder happens is not true if the hashing yard does not occur. sent14: the debridement does not occur. sent15: the viceregalness does not occur and the hashing Djiboutian happens. sent16: if the hashing yard happens then that the shoplifting occurs and the debridement does not occur is not correct. sent17: the fact that the bust-up does not occur but the kindness happens is not correct. sent18: the bankruptcy does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent14 -> int1: the teasing does not occur and the converging does not occur.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the shoplifting does not occur and the rejoinder does not occur is not right.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the rejoinder happens.; __UNKNOWN__