the hosiery impels hosiery.
sent1: something does pith if either it is corporate or it is not a noisemaker or both. sent2: if something is a Mus then it is corporate and/or it is not sugary. sent3: the snuffler is corporate and/or it is not a noisemaker if it is not a Mus. sent4: if the snuffler is corporate then it is a kind of a pith. sent5: the hosiery impels hosiery if the snuffler is a pith. sent6: the snuffler is not a Mus.
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the snuffler is corporate and/or is not a noisemaker.; sent1 -> int2: the snuffler does pith if it is corporate and/or it is not a noisemaker.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snuffler is a pith.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the Kanarese is corporate and/or is not sugary.
sent2 -> int4: if the Kanarese is a Mus then it is corporate and/or it is not sugary.;
$hypothesis$ = the hosiery impels hosiery. ; $context$ = sent1: something does pith if either it is corporate or it is not a noisemaker or both. sent2: if something is a Mus then it is corporate and/or it is not sugary. sent3: the snuffler is corporate and/or it is not a noisemaker if it is not a Mus. sent4: if the snuffler is corporate then it is a kind of a pith. sent5: the hosiery impels hosiery if the snuffler is a pith. sent6: the snuffler is not a Mus. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the snuffler is corporate and/or is not a noisemaker.; sent1 -> int2: the snuffler does pith if it is corporate and/or it is not a noisemaker.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snuffler is a pith.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__