if the tournament does not occur the fact that both the non-benzylicness and the exchangeableness occurs is false.
sent1: if the tournament does not occur but the shoplifting happens then the Gandhianness happens. sent2: that not the benzylicness but the exchangeableness happens is not correct if the tournament occurs. sent3: the fact that the conjunctness does not occur and the shoplifting does not occur does not hold if that the inextinguishableness happens hold. sent4: if not the biopiracy but the overpowering billfish happens then the fact that the barbing Verrazano happens is correct. sent5: the fact that the benzylicness and the exchangeableness occurs is not right. sent6: the inextinguishableness occurs and the shoplifting happens. sent7: if that the conjunctness does not occur and the shoplifting does not occur is not correct the conjunctness happens. sent8: the inextinguishableness occurs. sent9: the exchangeableness occurs if either the overpowering sonneteer does not occur or the benzylicness happens or both. sent10: the fact that the benzylicness does not occur but the exchangeableness happens is not right if the Gandhianness occurs. sent11: if the tournament happens then the inextinguishableness occurs. sent12: if the tournament does not occur then the benzylicness does not occur and the exchangeableness happens. sent13: the fact that the benzylicness happens and the exchangeableness occurs is not right if the tournament does not occur. sent14: the fact that the Gandhianness happens if the tournament and the shoplifting happens is not incorrect. sent15: that the overpowering sonneteer does not occur and/or the benzylicness occurs is triggered by that the overpowering billfish does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the Gandhianness occurs hold that the benzylicness and the exchangeableness happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tournament does not occur.; sent6 -> int1: the shoplifting occurs.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: not the tournament but the shoplifting occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the Gandhianness occurs.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the fact that that the benzylicness does not occur but the exchangeableness happens is true is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the conjunctness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the tournament does not occur the fact that both the non-benzylicness and the exchangeableness occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tournament does not occur but the shoplifting happens then the Gandhianness happens. sent2: that not the benzylicness but the exchangeableness happens is not correct if the tournament occurs. sent3: the fact that the conjunctness does not occur and the shoplifting does not occur does not hold if that the inextinguishableness happens hold. sent4: if not the biopiracy but the overpowering billfish happens then the fact that the barbing Verrazano happens is correct. sent5: the fact that the benzylicness and the exchangeableness occurs is not right. sent6: the inextinguishableness occurs and the shoplifting happens. sent7: if that the conjunctness does not occur and the shoplifting does not occur is not correct the conjunctness happens. sent8: the inextinguishableness occurs. sent9: the exchangeableness occurs if either the overpowering sonneteer does not occur or the benzylicness happens or both. sent10: the fact that the benzylicness does not occur but the exchangeableness happens is not right if the Gandhianness occurs. sent11: if the tournament happens then the inextinguishableness occurs. sent12: if the tournament does not occur then the benzylicness does not occur and the exchangeableness happens. sent13: the fact that the benzylicness happens and the exchangeableness occurs is not right if the tournament does not occur. sent14: the fact that the Gandhianness happens if the tournament and the shoplifting happens is not incorrect. sent15: that the overpowering sonneteer does not occur and/or the benzylicness occurs is triggered by that the overpowering billfish does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the Gandhianness occurs hold that the benzylicness and the exchangeableness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tournament does not occur.; sent6 -> int1: the shoplifting occurs.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: not the tournament but the shoplifting occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the Gandhianness occurs.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the fact that that the benzylicness does not occur but the exchangeableness happens is true is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__