the fact that the dogmatizing M3 does not occur if that the relations and the lecturing occurs is not wrong is incorrect.
sent1: the dogmatizing M3 occurs. sent2: the vitality happens. sent3: if the dogmatizing flannelbush happens then the fact that that the acquainting nitrofurantoin but not the empyrealness happens is not wrong is false. sent4: that the relations occurs and the acquainting Oenothera happens prevents that the dogmatizing M3 does not occur. sent5: the fact that the final happens is true. sent6: the dogmatizing train occurs. sent7: the non-rehabilitativeness leads to that the acquainting Oenothera does not occur but the dogmatizing M3 happens. sent8: the acquainting weatherman does not occur if both the deriving and the bellow occurs. sent9: the dogmatizing M3 does not occur if both the relations and the acquainting Oenothera occurs. sent10: the fact that the lecture occurs hold. sent11: the acquainting Oenothera happens. sent12: if the lecture does not occur the bunking peristyle happens and the relations occurs. sent13: the dogmatizing monoxide occurs. sent14: the fact that both the nearness and the defacement happens is not correct if the acquainting nitrofurantoin does not occur. sent15: the fact that the rehabilitativeness does not occur is not incorrect if that the nearness happens and the defacement happens does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the relations does not occur is not false then the dogmatizing Balanchine occurs. sent17: the jousting does not occur if both the mothering and the helpfulness happens. sent18: if both the relations and the lecture happens then the fact that the dogmatizing M3 occurs is not incorrect. sent19: the counterclaiming occurs. sent20: if the fact that the acquainting nitrofurantoin occurs but the empyrealness does not occur is not true the fact that the acquainting nitrofurantoin does not occur is correct. sent21: that the chapel happens and the substantivalness occurs triggers that the dogmatizing spicule does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the relations and the lecturing occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the relations occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the relations and the acquainting Oenothera occurs.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the dogmatizing M3 does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the dogmatizing Balanchine happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dogmatizing M3 does not occur if that the relations and the lecturing occurs is not wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the dogmatizing M3 occurs. sent2: the vitality happens. sent3: if the dogmatizing flannelbush happens then the fact that that the acquainting nitrofurantoin but not the empyrealness happens is not wrong is false. sent4: that the relations occurs and the acquainting Oenothera happens prevents that the dogmatizing M3 does not occur. sent5: the fact that the final happens is true. sent6: the dogmatizing train occurs. sent7: the non-rehabilitativeness leads to that the acquainting Oenothera does not occur but the dogmatizing M3 happens. sent8: the acquainting weatherman does not occur if both the deriving and the bellow occurs. sent9: the dogmatizing M3 does not occur if both the relations and the acquainting Oenothera occurs. sent10: the fact that the lecture occurs hold. sent11: the acquainting Oenothera happens. sent12: if the lecture does not occur the bunking peristyle happens and the relations occurs. sent13: the dogmatizing monoxide occurs. sent14: the fact that both the nearness and the defacement happens is not correct if the acquainting nitrofurantoin does not occur. sent15: the fact that the rehabilitativeness does not occur is not incorrect if that the nearness happens and the defacement happens does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the relations does not occur is not false then the dogmatizing Balanchine occurs. sent17: the jousting does not occur if both the mothering and the helpfulness happens. sent18: if both the relations and the lecture happens then the fact that the dogmatizing M3 occurs is not incorrect. sent19: the counterclaiming occurs. sent20: if the fact that the acquainting nitrofurantoin occurs but the empyrealness does not occur is not true the fact that the acquainting nitrofurantoin does not occur is correct. sent21: that the chapel happens and the substantivalness occurs triggers that the dogmatizing spicule does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the relations and the lecturing occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the relations occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the relations and the acquainting Oenothera occurs.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the dogmatizing M3 does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__