there exists something such that if it is butyric it is effervescent.
sent1: if something is not effervescent and it is not testate then it does wrestle Amberboa. sent2: something is a indigence and grumbles countercheck if it is not basidiomycetous. sent3: the fact that the masturbator is not a kind of a terminal but it is cubital is wrong. sent4: if something wrestles Amberboa then the fact that it is effervescent is correct. sent5: if the scapula is butyric then it wrestles Amberboa. sent6: the salol is binucleate. sent7: that something is both not effervescent and intestate is true if it grumbles countercheck. sent8: the scapula is a kind of a serratus. sent9: if something does wrestle Amberboa then the scapula is butyric and does stint sect. sent10: if the fact that the scapula is a muffled hold then that it does stint idolization is correct. sent11: there is something such that if it does stint salol it is paranormal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scapula is butyric.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the scapula does wrestle Amberboa.; sent4 -> int2: if the scapula does wrestle Amberboa it is effervescent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the scapula is effervescent.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the scapula is butyric then it is effervescent.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the scapula stints sect.
sent1 -> int5: if the suffragist is not effervescent but intestate it wrestles Amberboa.; sent7 -> int6: if the suffragist grumbles countercheck it is not effervescent and is not testate.; sent2 -> int7: the suffragist is a kind of a indigence and it does grumble countercheck if it is not basidiomycetous.; sent3 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it is not terminal and it is cubital is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is butyric it is effervescent. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not effervescent and it is not testate then it does wrestle Amberboa. sent2: something is a indigence and grumbles countercheck if it is not basidiomycetous. sent3: the fact that the masturbator is not a kind of a terminal but it is cubital is wrong. sent4: if something wrestles Amberboa then the fact that it is effervescent is correct. sent5: if the scapula is butyric then it wrestles Amberboa. sent6: the salol is binucleate. sent7: that something is both not effervescent and intestate is true if it grumbles countercheck. sent8: the scapula is a kind of a serratus. sent9: if something does wrestle Amberboa then the scapula is butyric and does stint sect. sent10: if the fact that the scapula is a muffled hold then that it does stint idolization is correct. sent11: there is something such that if it does stint salol it is paranormal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scapula is butyric.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the scapula does wrestle Amberboa.; sent4 -> int2: if the scapula does wrestle Amberboa it is effervescent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the scapula is effervescent.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the scapula is butyric then it is effervescent.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__