the fact that there exists something such that if either it does not manacle Lilliputian or it is not a kind of an undercut or both it is not a branchiopod is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does manacle Lilliputian and/or it does not undercut it is not a branchiopod. sent2: if the tetrahymena does not manacle Lilliputian then it is not a branchiopod. sent3: the Brie is a kind of a bruise if it is not noncollapsible and/or it is not a branchiopod. sent4: if the tetrahymena either does steepen chicken or is not immodest or both it does not manacle Lilliputian. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is not faucal hold it is not a theory. sent6: if something is not an abstinence or it is not a beatnik or both then it is not a Meyerhof. sent7: if the halfback does not invite cytosol and/or is not a kind of a blast it is a double. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a Fructidor then it is not a vertical hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an abstinence or it is not a kind of a admass or both then it does not ebb Samanala. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not manacle Lilliputian then it is not branchiopod. sent11: the tetrahymena is not unfruitful if either it does not manacle apprehension or it is not entozoan or both. sent12: if something does not steepen chicken and/or it does not undercut it is not a kind of a garmentmaker. sent13: if the tetrahymena does not manacle Lilliputian or it is not an undercut or both it is not a kind of a branchiopod. sent14: if that the tetrahymena is not a kind of an undercut or is not a midwife or both is correct it is not a kind of a Arrhenatherum.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not an abstinence and/or is not a beatnik it is not a Meyerhof.
sent6 -> int1: the satellite is not a Meyerhof if it is not an abstinence or is not a beatnik or both.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if either it does not manacle Lilliputian or it is not a kind of an undercut or both it is not a branchiopod is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does manacle Lilliputian and/or it does not undercut it is not a branchiopod. sent2: if the tetrahymena does not manacle Lilliputian then it is not a branchiopod. sent3: the Brie is a kind of a bruise if it is not noncollapsible and/or it is not a branchiopod. sent4: if the tetrahymena either does steepen chicken or is not immodest or both it does not manacle Lilliputian. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is not faucal hold it is not a theory. sent6: if something is not an abstinence or it is not a beatnik or both then it is not a Meyerhof. sent7: if the halfback does not invite cytosol and/or is not a kind of a blast it is a double. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a Fructidor then it is not a vertical hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an abstinence or it is not a kind of a admass or both then it does not ebb Samanala. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not manacle Lilliputian then it is not branchiopod. sent11: the tetrahymena is not unfruitful if either it does not manacle apprehension or it is not entozoan or both. sent12: if something does not steepen chicken and/or it does not undercut it is not a kind of a garmentmaker. sent13: if the tetrahymena does not manacle Lilliputian or it is not an undercut or both it is not a kind of a branchiopod. sent14: if that the tetrahymena is not a kind of an undercut or is not a midwife or both is correct it is not a kind of a Arrhenatherum. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__