the grocery is not non-meteoric and not non-achromatic.
sent1: the gingerbread does not tunnel Hidatsa or it does peck vagary or both. sent2: the grocery does tunnel Hidatsa. sent3: the ale is not multidimensional. sent4: that the gingerbread is non-meteoric thing that does tunnel Hidatsa is not true. sent5: the fact that the gingerbread either does not tunnel Hidatsa or does peck vagary or both is false if the Sabahan does not tunnel Hidatsa. sent6: the psychrometer does marvel and does return. sent7: the Sabahan does not tunnel Hidatsa if that the ale is not non-vesical and/or does not marvel is false. sent8: the ale is not meteoric if that either the grocery nominates or it does marvel or both is not correct. sent9: the Sabahan does not marvel. sent10: the gearing does muckrake if it is a beadle. sent11: the fact that the gingerbread does not deaminate refractometer and/or is perinasal is not correct. sent12: if there is something such that that it is non-vesical thing that is a caffeine is incorrect the ale does marvel. sent13: the concoction does marvel. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it does not tunnel Hidatsa and is achromatic is wrong. sent15: the gingerbread is vesical. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is not vesical but a caffeine is wrong. sent17: something is both non-meteoric and not non-achromatic. sent18: if the ale is a caffeine then the fact that it is vesical and/or it does not marvel is false. sent19: that that the grocery is non-insubordinate thing that nominates hold is not correct. sent20: the ale is a caffeine if there is something such that that it does not nominate and it is achromatic does not hold. sent21: the fact that the ale either does nominate or does not marvel or both does not hold if it pecks vagary. sent22: the ale does not tunnel Hidatsa. sent23: the grocery is meteoric.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the grocery does not nominate but it is achromatic is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not nominate and is achromatic does not hold.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the ale is a caffeine.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the fact that that the ale is vesical and/or does not marvel is not wrong is incorrect.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the Sabahan does not tunnel Hidatsa is right.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the gingerbread does not tunnel Hidatsa and/or it pecks vagary does not hold.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the grocery does not nominate and is not non-achromatic.; int7 -> int8: the grocery is achromatic.; int8 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the grocery is not non-meteoric and not non-achromatic. ; $context$ = sent1: the gingerbread does not tunnel Hidatsa or it does peck vagary or both. sent2: the grocery does tunnel Hidatsa. sent3: the ale is not multidimensional. sent4: that the gingerbread is non-meteoric thing that does tunnel Hidatsa is not true. sent5: the fact that the gingerbread either does not tunnel Hidatsa or does peck vagary or both is false if the Sabahan does not tunnel Hidatsa. sent6: the psychrometer does marvel and does return. sent7: the Sabahan does not tunnel Hidatsa if that the ale is not non-vesical and/or does not marvel is false. sent8: the ale is not meteoric if that either the grocery nominates or it does marvel or both is not correct. sent9: the Sabahan does not marvel. sent10: the gearing does muckrake if it is a beadle. sent11: the fact that the gingerbread does not deaminate refractometer and/or is perinasal is not correct. sent12: if there is something such that that it is non-vesical thing that is a caffeine is incorrect the ale does marvel. sent13: the concoction does marvel. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it does not tunnel Hidatsa and is achromatic is wrong. sent15: the gingerbread is vesical. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is not vesical but a caffeine is wrong. sent17: something is both non-meteoric and not non-achromatic. sent18: if the ale is a caffeine then the fact that it is vesical and/or it does not marvel is false. sent19: that that the grocery is non-insubordinate thing that nominates hold is not correct. sent20: the ale is a caffeine if there is something such that that it does not nominate and it is achromatic does not hold. sent21: the fact that the ale either does nominate or does not marvel or both does not hold if it pecks vagary. sent22: the ale does not tunnel Hidatsa. sent23: the grocery is meteoric. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the grocery does not nominate but it is achromatic is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not nominate and is achromatic does not hold.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the ale is a caffeine.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the fact that that the ale is vesical and/or does not marvel is not wrong is incorrect.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the Sabahan does not tunnel Hidatsa is right.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the gingerbread does not tunnel Hidatsa and/or it pecks vagary does not hold.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the grocery does not nominate and is not non-achromatic.; int7 -> int8: the grocery is achromatic.; int8 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__