the Neopolitan is an alertness if the siloxane is not non-analytic.
sent1: the siloxane is an alertness and it is analytic. sent2: there exists something such that it is a briefing. sent3: there exists something such that it does excel and monopolizes mademoiselle. sent4: the Neopolitan is analytic if the siloxane is a kind of an alertness. sent5: the milo is catoptrics if there exists something such that it is a briefing. sent6: the milo attorns. sent7: if there exists something such that it is a briefing then the milo does not monopolize mademoiselle but it is catoptrics. sent8: the mixer is analytic. sent9: the siloxane does monopolize mademoiselle if the milo is non-analytic thing that does tribulate camel. sent10: the mixer is not an alertness and is analytic if something excels. sent11: the milo does not tribulate camel if there are catoptrics things. sent12: the Neopolitan is an alertness if something is analytic and tribulates camel. sent13: if something does excel and it is catoptrics the mixer does monopolize mademoiselle. sent14: the fact that if the milo does not monopolize mademoiselle and is catoptrics then the mixer excels hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the siloxane is analytic is right.; sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the milo does not monopolize mademoiselle but it is catoptrics.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the mixer excels.;
$hypothesis$ = the Neopolitan is an alertness if the siloxane is not non-analytic. ; $context$ = sent1: the siloxane is an alertness and it is analytic. sent2: there exists something such that it is a briefing. sent3: there exists something such that it does excel and monopolizes mademoiselle. sent4: the Neopolitan is analytic if the siloxane is a kind of an alertness. sent5: the milo is catoptrics if there exists something such that it is a briefing. sent6: the milo attorns. sent7: if there exists something such that it is a briefing then the milo does not monopolize mademoiselle but it is catoptrics. sent8: the mixer is analytic. sent9: the siloxane does monopolize mademoiselle if the milo is non-analytic thing that does tribulate camel. sent10: the mixer is not an alertness and is analytic if something excels. sent11: the milo does not tribulate camel if there are catoptrics things. sent12: the Neopolitan is an alertness if something is analytic and tribulates camel. sent13: if something does excel and it is catoptrics the mixer does monopolize mademoiselle. sent14: the fact that if the milo does not monopolize mademoiselle and is catoptrics then the mixer excels hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the siloxane is analytic is right.; sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the milo does not monopolize mademoiselle but it is catoptrics.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the mixer excels.; __UNKNOWN__