that the intercom is not lingual and/or it is a Osasco does not hold.
sent1: the vinifera either enfranchises crocolite or does stroll or both. sent2: the lexicalization does not repine agency if the sloganeer is an epicure and it repine agency. sent3: there exists something such that it enfranchises perch and it does repine agency. sent4: if something is a kind of non-lingual thing that does not repine segment it is an epicure. sent5: the intercom is a lingual or it is an epicure or both. sent6: something enfranchises perch and it is a Osasco if it does not repine agency. sent7: there is something such that it is a lingual. sent8: something does not repine agency if it is an epicure. sent9: if there is something such that it does enfranchise perch and repines agency the lexicalization is an epicure. sent10: either the intercom is not a lingual or it is a Osasco or both if the lexicalization is a kind of an epicure.
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the lexicalization is a kind of an epicure hold.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the poison is a Osasco is correct.
sent6 -> int2: if the poison does not repine agency then it enfranchises perch and is a Osasco.; sent8 -> int3: if the poison is an epicure the fact that it does not repine agency hold.; sent4 -> int4: if the poison is a kind of non-lingual thing that does not repine segment then it is an epicure.;
$hypothesis$ = that the intercom is not lingual and/or it is a Osasco does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the vinifera either enfranchises crocolite or does stroll or both. sent2: the lexicalization does not repine agency if the sloganeer is an epicure and it repine agency. sent3: there exists something such that it enfranchises perch and it does repine agency. sent4: if something is a kind of non-lingual thing that does not repine segment it is an epicure. sent5: the intercom is a lingual or it is an epicure or both. sent6: something enfranchises perch and it is a Osasco if it does not repine agency. sent7: there is something such that it is a lingual. sent8: something does not repine agency if it is an epicure. sent9: if there is something such that it does enfranchise perch and repines agency the lexicalization is an epicure. sent10: either the intercom is not a lingual or it is a Osasco or both if the lexicalization is a kind of an epicure. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the lexicalization is a kind of an epicure hold.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__