the stretch is not seismological.
sent1: if something is a Delonix and does not subtilize kawaka then it does birdnest Bernard. sent2: if the fact that something does birdnest Bernard is not incorrect then it is seismological. sent3: everything is a Delonix and does not subtilize kawaka. sent4: if something is a Delonix and it subtilizes kawaka then it does birdnest Bernard.
sent3 -> int1: the stretch is a Delonix and does not subtilize kawaka.; sent1 -> int2: if the stretch is a kind of a Delonix and does not subtilize kawaka then it birdnests Bernard.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stretch birdnests Bernard hold.; sent2 -> int4: if the stretch does birdnest Bernard it is seismological.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the stretch is not seismological. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Delonix and does not subtilize kawaka then it does birdnest Bernard. sent2: if the fact that something does birdnest Bernard is not incorrect then it is seismological. sent3: everything is a Delonix and does not subtilize kawaka. sent4: if something is a Delonix and it subtilizes kawaka then it does birdnest Bernard. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the stretch is a Delonix and does not subtilize kawaka.; sent1 -> int2: if the stretch is a kind of a Delonix and does not subtilize kawaka then it birdnests Bernard.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stretch birdnests Bernard hold.; sent2 -> int4: if the stretch does birdnest Bernard it is seismological.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__