the powderer does not shift.
sent1: the goldbrick is not a kind of a glazed if it is not a execration and not a Linum. sent2: if something is a kind of a abasia then it is tights. sent3: the fact that the goldbrick is not a kind of a glazed hold if it is not a kind of a execration and it is a kind of a Linum. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not scuff washerman and does dart combat is false. sent5: the fact that there is something such that that it is a kind of a Baltic and measures voider is not correct hold. sent6: there is something such that it does not scuff washerman and it darts combat. sent7: something is a kind of non-Baltic thing that does measure voider. sent8: the goldbrick is not a kind of a Linum. sent9: the fact that the washerman is not a Baltic and measures voider is wrong if the powderer is not a shifting. sent10: if something is tights then it is a kind of a server. sent11: the fact that the washerman is Baltic and it measures voider is incorrect. sent12: that the goldbrick is a kind of a glazed hold if it is a server. sent13: that the washerman is a kind of a Baltic that does measure voider is wrong if the powderer is not a shifting. sent14: there exists something such that that it does scuff washerman and darts combat is not correct. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Baltic then the goldbrick is a kind of a abasia. sent16: if the goldbrick does not dart combat it is not a execration and it is not a kind of a Linum. sent17: if there exists something such that it does scuff washerman then the goldbrick does not dart combat. sent18: the goldbrick does not dart combat if there exists something such that that it does not scuff washerman and dart combat is incorrect. sent19: if something is fibrocalcific it is a execration. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is not a Baltic and does measure voider is wrong the goldbrick is a abasia.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the powderer does not shift.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the washerman is not a kind of a Baltic but it does measure voider is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is non-Baltic thing that measures voider does not hold.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the fact that the goldbrick is a abasia is not incorrect.; sent2 -> int4: if the goldbrick is a abasia it is tights.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the goldbrick is tights.; sent10 -> int6: the goldbrick is a server if the fact that it is tights is true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the goldbrick is a server.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the goldbrick is a kind of a glazed.; sent4 & sent18 -> int9: the goldbrick does not dart combat.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the goldbrick is not a execration and is not a Linum.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the goldbrick is not a kind of a glazed.; int8 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the washerman is a execration if it is fibrocalcific.
sent19 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the powderer does not shift. ; $context$ = sent1: the goldbrick is not a kind of a glazed if it is not a execration and not a Linum. sent2: if something is a kind of a abasia then it is tights. sent3: the fact that the goldbrick is not a kind of a glazed hold if it is not a kind of a execration and it is a kind of a Linum. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not scuff washerman and does dart combat is false. sent5: the fact that there is something such that that it is a kind of a Baltic and measures voider is not correct hold. sent6: there is something such that it does not scuff washerman and it darts combat. sent7: something is a kind of non-Baltic thing that does measure voider. sent8: the goldbrick is not a kind of a Linum. sent9: the fact that the washerman is not a Baltic and measures voider is wrong if the powderer is not a shifting. sent10: if something is tights then it is a kind of a server. sent11: the fact that the washerman is Baltic and it measures voider is incorrect. sent12: that the goldbrick is a kind of a glazed hold if it is a server. sent13: that the washerman is a kind of a Baltic that does measure voider is wrong if the powderer is not a shifting. sent14: there exists something such that that it does scuff washerman and darts combat is not correct. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Baltic then the goldbrick is a kind of a abasia. sent16: if the goldbrick does not dart combat it is not a execration and it is not a kind of a Linum. sent17: if there exists something such that it does scuff washerman then the goldbrick does not dart combat. sent18: the goldbrick does not dart combat if there exists something such that that it does not scuff washerman and dart combat is incorrect. sent19: if something is fibrocalcific it is a execration. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is not a Baltic and does measure voider is wrong the goldbrick is a abasia. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the powderer does not shift.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the washerman is not a kind of a Baltic but it does measure voider is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is non-Baltic thing that measures voider does not hold.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the fact that the goldbrick is a abasia is not incorrect.; sent2 -> int4: if the goldbrick is a abasia it is tights.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the goldbrick is tights.; sent10 -> int6: the goldbrick is a server if the fact that it is tights is true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the goldbrick is a server.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the goldbrick is a kind of a glazed.; sent4 & sent18 -> int9: the goldbrick does not dart combat.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the goldbrick is not a execration and is not a Linum.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the goldbrick is not a kind of a glazed.; int8 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__