the bicarbonate is not a nonaggression.
sent1: the madnep veils ostentation if it is a kind of non-fascist thing that trices FHLMC. sent2: if the fact that the madnep does not veil ostentation is not wrong then the layman does trice barbed. sent3: if the layman is not fascist the madnep is a fascist. sent4: that the bicarbonate does trice FHLMC and is a kind of a immotility is not true. sent5: the fact that the Ottawa does occult stub and it veils ostentation is wrong. sent6: if something that does not veil tappet is acronymic then it is not non-fascist. sent7: if something does trice FHLMC and/or it is a immotility then it does not dim critter. sent8: something does trice barbed and is a kind of a nonaggression if it does not veil ostentation. sent9: if that something does not trice barbed and it is not a nonaggression is wrong then it is a kind of a nonaggression. sent10: if something transmits or it does dim critter or both it is not a nonaggression. sent11: that if the madnep is a kind of a fascist then the galena is a kind of acronymic thing that does not veil tappet is not wrong. sent12: if the galena does not veil ostentation then the bicarbonate veil ostentation. sent13: that that the galena is not a creditworthiness and/or it trices watercourse hold does not hold. sent14: if the bicarbonate is a kind of a fascist it does transmit. sent15: if the fact that the spoor is a acromegaly and is a kind of a Eckhart is false it is not a kind of a fascist. sent16: the bicarbonate is not acronymic if the galena is acronymic thing that does not veil tappet. sent17: if the layman does trice barbed then the bicarbonate is not non-acronymic. sent18: if something is not acronymic then the fact that it does not veil ostentation is correct. sent19: the bicarbonate does not veil tappet if that it trices FHLMC and is a immotility is incorrect. sent20: the madnep does not veil ostentation if that the galena either is not a creditworthiness or trices watercourse or both is not true. sent21: if the madnep is not a kind of a fascist the fact that the galena veils tappet but it is not acronymic does not hold. sent22: that the madnep trices barbed hold. sent23: something that does dim critter and does not transmit is not fascist.
sent20 & sent13 -> int1: the madnep does not veil ostentation.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the layman does trice barbed.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the bicarbonate is acronymic.; sent19 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the bicarbonate does not veil tappet is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bicarbonate does not veil tappet but it is acronymic.; sent6 -> int6: the bicarbonate is a fascist if it does not veil tappet and is acronymic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bicarbonate is not non-fascist.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the bicarbonate transmits.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the bicarbonate either transmits or dims critter or both hold.; sent10 -> int10: the bicarbonate is not a nonaggression if either it transmits or it does dim critter or both.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the bicarbonate is a kind of a nonaggression is right.
sent8 -> int11: if the bicarbonate does not veil ostentation it does trice barbed and it is a nonaggression.; sent18 -> int12: if the bicarbonate is not acronymic it does not veil ostentation.; sent23 -> int13: the layman is not a kind of a fascist if it dims critter and it does not transmit.;
$hypothesis$ = the bicarbonate is not a nonaggression. ; $context$ = sent1: the madnep veils ostentation if it is a kind of non-fascist thing that trices FHLMC. sent2: if the fact that the madnep does not veil ostentation is not wrong then the layman does trice barbed. sent3: if the layman is not fascist the madnep is a fascist. sent4: that the bicarbonate does trice FHLMC and is a kind of a immotility is not true. sent5: the fact that the Ottawa does occult stub and it veils ostentation is wrong. sent6: if something that does not veil tappet is acronymic then it is not non-fascist. sent7: if something does trice FHLMC and/or it is a immotility then it does not dim critter. sent8: something does trice barbed and is a kind of a nonaggression if it does not veil ostentation. sent9: if that something does not trice barbed and it is not a nonaggression is wrong then it is a kind of a nonaggression. sent10: if something transmits or it does dim critter or both it is not a nonaggression. sent11: that if the madnep is a kind of a fascist then the galena is a kind of acronymic thing that does not veil tappet is not wrong. sent12: if the galena does not veil ostentation then the bicarbonate veil ostentation. sent13: that that the galena is not a creditworthiness and/or it trices watercourse hold does not hold. sent14: if the bicarbonate is a kind of a fascist it does transmit. sent15: if the fact that the spoor is a acromegaly and is a kind of a Eckhart is false it is not a kind of a fascist. sent16: the bicarbonate is not acronymic if the galena is acronymic thing that does not veil tappet. sent17: if the layman does trice barbed then the bicarbonate is not non-acronymic. sent18: if something is not acronymic then the fact that it does not veil ostentation is correct. sent19: the bicarbonate does not veil tappet if that it trices FHLMC and is a immotility is incorrect. sent20: the madnep does not veil ostentation if that the galena either is not a creditworthiness or trices watercourse or both is not true. sent21: if the madnep is not a kind of a fascist the fact that the galena veils tappet but it is not acronymic does not hold. sent22: that the madnep trices barbed hold. sent23: something that does dim critter and does not transmit is not fascist. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent13 -> int1: the madnep does not veil ostentation.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the layman does trice barbed.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the bicarbonate is acronymic.; sent19 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the bicarbonate does not veil tappet is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bicarbonate does not veil tappet but it is acronymic.; sent6 -> int6: the bicarbonate is a fascist if it does not veil tappet and is acronymic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bicarbonate is not non-fascist.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the bicarbonate transmits.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the bicarbonate either transmits or dims critter or both hold.; sent10 -> int10: the bicarbonate is not a nonaggression if either it transmits or it does dim critter or both.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__