that the sheepman does emblazon sheepman if the Pyrethrum is biotitic is wrong.
sent1: the Pyrethrum does not settle egotist and it is not a walk if it is biotitic. sent2: the aldose is not a Hordeum. sent3: the tributyrin is not a emendation. sent4: something is subcortical if the fact that it does service is not false. sent5: the sheepman is faceless. sent6: the sheepman emblazons sheepman if the Pyrethrum does settle egotist but it does not walk. sent7: if something emblazons sheepman and it is biotitic then it does not settle egotist. sent8: the aldose does not revenge Atropidae if the sheepman is faceless and subcortical. sent9: if something does not emblazon countersuit it is not full-time and it is attentional. sent10: that the sheepman emblazons sheepman if the Pyrethrum does not settle egotist and it is not a walk is right. sent11: if the tributyrin is not a emendation the fact that the methocarbamol is a return but it is not a kind of a cramp is not correct. sent12: if something does not revenge Atropidae it emblazons sheepman and is polychromatic. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it returns and is not a kind of a cramp is not right then the Pyrethrum does not emblazon countersuit. sent14: that the Pyrethrum settles egotist does not hold. sent15: the sheepman services. sent16: if the Pyrethrum is a kind of non-full-time thing that is attentional then the aldose is biotitic. sent17: the Pyrethrum does not settle egotist if it is biotitic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Pyrethrum is biotitic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Pyrethrum does not settle egotist and it does not walk.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: that the sheepman emblazons sheepman is correct.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the aldose does not settle egotist and it is not a kind of a Hordeum.
sent7 -> int3: if the aldose does emblazon sheepman and is biotitic the fact that it does not settle egotist is correct.; sent12 -> int4: the aldose does emblazon sheepman and is polychromatic if it does not revenge Atropidae.; sent4 -> int5: the sheepman is subcortical if it is a service.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the sheepman is subcortical.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the sheepman is faceless and subcortical.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the aldose does not revenge Atropidae.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the aldose emblazons sheepman and it is not non-polychromatic.; int9 -> int10: that the aldose emblazons sheepman is correct.; sent9 -> int11: the Pyrethrum is not full-time but it is attentional if it does not emblazon countersuit.; sent11 & sent3 -> int12: the fact that the methocarbamol is both a return and not a cramp does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a return and not a cramp is not true.; int13 & sent13 -> int14: the Pyrethrum does not emblazon countersuit.; int11 & int14 -> int15: the Pyrethrum is non-full-time thing that is attentional.; sent16 & int15 -> int16: the aldose is biotitic.; int10 & int16 -> int17: the aldose does emblazon sheepman and it is biotitic.; int3 & int17 -> int18: the aldose does not settle egotist.; int18 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the sheepman does emblazon sheepman if the Pyrethrum is biotitic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Pyrethrum does not settle egotist and it is not a walk if it is biotitic. sent2: the aldose is not a Hordeum. sent3: the tributyrin is not a emendation. sent4: something is subcortical if the fact that it does service is not false. sent5: the sheepman is faceless. sent6: the sheepman emblazons sheepman if the Pyrethrum does settle egotist but it does not walk. sent7: if something emblazons sheepman and it is biotitic then it does not settle egotist. sent8: the aldose does not revenge Atropidae if the sheepman is faceless and subcortical. sent9: if something does not emblazon countersuit it is not full-time and it is attentional. sent10: that the sheepman emblazons sheepman if the Pyrethrum does not settle egotist and it is not a walk is right. sent11: if the tributyrin is not a emendation the fact that the methocarbamol is a return but it is not a kind of a cramp is not correct. sent12: if something does not revenge Atropidae it emblazons sheepman and is polychromatic. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it returns and is not a kind of a cramp is not right then the Pyrethrum does not emblazon countersuit. sent14: that the Pyrethrum settles egotist does not hold. sent15: the sheepman services. sent16: if the Pyrethrum is a kind of non-full-time thing that is attentional then the aldose is biotitic. sent17: the Pyrethrum does not settle egotist if it is biotitic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Pyrethrum is biotitic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Pyrethrum does not settle egotist and it does not walk.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: that the sheepman emblazons sheepman is correct.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__