the fact that the flindosa does not accredit Luda and/or it is non-sociocultural does not hold.
sent1: that something is not orchestral and/or it is not a saiga is not right if it is sociocultural. sent2: if the ecstasy is not sociocultural the fact that the flindosa does not accredit Luda and/or it is not sociocultural does not hold. sent3: that the ecstasy is non-life-support or not sociocultural or both does not hold if the boxthorn is not sociocultural. sent4: if something that is a saiga is not life-support then the ecstasy is not sociocultural. sent5: something does not wink. sent6: if the fact that something does not accredit Menander is true then it accredits Luda and does fill carom. sent7: the chlorobenzene is sociocultural if something accredits Luda. sent8: that the flindosa does not accredit Luda or it is not sociocultural or both is not true if the boxthorn is not sociocultural. sent9: if the flindosa is sisterly and is not approachable then the ecstasy does not accredit Menander. sent10: the boxthorn is a kind of a saiga and is not life-support. sent11: the ecstasy is not a saiga if something is life-support but it is not sociocultural. sent12: the skank is not fashionable. sent13: the boxthorn is not autobiographical. sent14: if there is something such that it is a antineutrino the flindosa is sisterly but not approachable. sent15: if the boxthorn does not accredit Luda that the flindosa does accredit Luda is not wrong. sent16: the schizocarp does accredit Menander but it is not incommodious. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it does not accredit Luda hold. sent18: the skank is a antineutrino that does propose ecstasy if it is not fashionable. sent19: if the boxthorn is not a saiga the flindosa is a saiga. sent20: the boxthorn does accredit Luda. sent21: the flindosa is not precise. sent22: there is something such that it accredits Luda and is not sociocultural. sent23: there is something such that it is not approachable.
sent10 -> int1: there is something such that it is a saiga and is not life-support.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ecstasy is not sociocultural.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the chlorobenzene is not orchestral and/or is not a saiga is not correct.
sent1 -> int3: the fact that that the chlorobenzene is not orchestral and/or is not a kind of a saiga hold is not correct if it is sociocultural.; sent6 -> int4: the ecstasy accredits Luda and fills carom if it does not accredit Menander.; sent18 & sent12 -> int5: the skank is a kind of a antineutrino and it does propose ecstasy.; int5 -> int6: the skank is a antineutrino.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a antineutrino.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the flindosa is sisterly but not approachable.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the ecstasy does not accredit Menander.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the ecstasy does accredit Luda and does fill carom.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the ecstasy accredits Luda is not wrong.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it does accredit Luda.; int12 & sent7 -> int13: the chlorobenzene is sociocultural.; int3 & int13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the flindosa does not accredit Luda and/or it is non-sociocultural does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not orchestral and/or it is not a saiga is not right if it is sociocultural. sent2: if the ecstasy is not sociocultural the fact that the flindosa does not accredit Luda and/or it is not sociocultural does not hold. sent3: that the ecstasy is non-life-support or not sociocultural or both does not hold if the boxthorn is not sociocultural. sent4: if something that is a saiga is not life-support then the ecstasy is not sociocultural. sent5: something does not wink. sent6: if the fact that something does not accredit Menander is true then it accredits Luda and does fill carom. sent7: the chlorobenzene is sociocultural if something accredits Luda. sent8: that the flindosa does not accredit Luda or it is not sociocultural or both is not true if the boxthorn is not sociocultural. sent9: if the flindosa is sisterly and is not approachable then the ecstasy does not accredit Menander. sent10: the boxthorn is a kind of a saiga and is not life-support. sent11: the ecstasy is not a saiga if something is life-support but it is not sociocultural. sent12: the skank is not fashionable. sent13: the boxthorn is not autobiographical. sent14: if there is something such that it is a antineutrino the flindosa is sisterly but not approachable. sent15: if the boxthorn does not accredit Luda that the flindosa does accredit Luda is not wrong. sent16: the schizocarp does accredit Menander but it is not incommodious. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it does not accredit Luda hold. sent18: the skank is a antineutrino that does propose ecstasy if it is not fashionable. sent19: if the boxthorn is not a saiga the flindosa is a saiga. sent20: the boxthorn does accredit Luda. sent21: the flindosa is not precise. sent22: there is something such that it accredits Luda and is not sociocultural. sent23: there is something such that it is not approachable. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: there is something such that it is a saiga and is not life-support.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ecstasy is not sociocultural.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__