the flop is a cluttered.
sent1: if the flop does not unite then it is bistroic. sent2: if that the ventriloquist decoys effusion is true that it clutters and it does unite does not hold. sent3: the fact that something is not a kind of a Husserl and decoys effusion does not hold if it revolts. sent4: if something decoys stoner and is a kind of a taste it is not a kind of a cluttered. sent5: the ventriloquist overtires. sent6: if something does not decoy effusion and is not a Husserl it is not impressive. sent7: the flop tastes. sent8: that the flop decoys stoner and it is a kind of a Husserl does not hold. sent9: if that the lane is not a Tamil and is a Cladorhyncus is not right it is not Tamil. sent10: if the ventriloquist decoys stoner then the flop does not decoy effusion and it is not a Husserl. sent11: the granola does decoy funfair and is aural. sent12: the funfair decoys Sucre. sent13: that the flop is a kind of impersonal a cluttered is not true. sent14: the fact that the ventriloquist does decoy stoner is not false if it does taste. sent15: the fact that the ventriloquist is a kind of a Husserl that unites is incorrect. sent16: if something unites then it does decoy stoner. sent17: if the ventriloquist is both impersonal and bistroic it is not a taste. sent18: if the fact that the flop is bistroic is right then the ventriloquist is impressive. sent19: something is a kind of a cluttered if that it does unite and it is not bistroic does not hold. sent20: if that the ventriloquist does not revolt but it is impersonal is not correct it revolt. sent21: something is not a kind of a Husserl if it does decoy stoner and is impersonal. sent22: if the flop is not bistroic then the dot is impersonal and it unites. sent23: if the ventriloquist is impressive it is not a Husserl and does decoy effusion. sent24: if something is not impressive the fact that it does unite and is not bistroic is not right. sent25: that the ventriloquist does not revolt but it is impersonal is wrong. sent26: the ventriloquist does decoy Sucre.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the flop does not unite is right.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the flop is bistroic.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the ventriloquist is impressive.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the ventriloquist is not a Husserl but it does decoy effusion.; sent3 -> int4: that the ventriloquist is not a Husserl but it does decoy effusion is wrong if it does revolt.; sent20 & sent25 -> int5: the ventriloquist revolts.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the ventriloquist is not a Husserl and does decoy effusion is false.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the flop does unite.; sent16 -> int9: if the flop does unite then it does decoy stoner.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the flop does decoy stoner.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the flop decoys stoner and is a taste.; sent4 -> int12: the flop is not a cluttered if it decoys stoner and it is a taste.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the flop is a cluttered.
sent19 -> int13: if that the flop does unite and is not bistroic is not true it is a kind of a cluttered.; sent24 -> int14: the fact that the flop does unite but it is not bistroic is false if it is not impressive.; sent6 -> int15: if the flop does not decoy effusion and is not a Husserl it is not impressive.;
$hypothesis$ = the flop is a cluttered. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flop does not unite then it is bistroic. sent2: if that the ventriloquist decoys effusion is true that it clutters and it does unite does not hold. sent3: the fact that something is not a kind of a Husserl and decoys effusion does not hold if it revolts. sent4: if something decoys stoner and is a kind of a taste it is not a kind of a cluttered. sent5: the ventriloquist overtires. sent6: if something does not decoy effusion and is not a Husserl it is not impressive. sent7: the flop tastes. sent8: that the flop decoys stoner and it is a kind of a Husserl does not hold. sent9: if that the lane is not a Tamil and is a Cladorhyncus is not right it is not Tamil. sent10: if the ventriloquist decoys stoner then the flop does not decoy effusion and it is not a Husserl. sent11: the granola does decoy funfair and is aural. sent12: the funfair decoys Sucre. sent13: that the flop is a kind of impersonal a cluttered is not true. sent14: the fact that the ventriloquist does decoy stoner is not false if it does taste. sent15: the fact that the ventriloquist is a kind of a Husserl that unites is incorrect. sent16: if something unites then it does decoy stoner. sent17: if the ventriloquist is both impersonal and bistroic it is not a taste. sent18: if the fact that the flop is bistroic is right then the ventriloquist is impressive. sent19: something is a kind of a cluttered if that it does unite and it is not bistroic does not hold. sent20: if that the ventriloquist does not revolt but it is impersonal is not correct it revolt. sent21: something is not a kind of a Husserl if it does decoy stoner and is impersonal. sent22: if the flop is not bistroic then the dot is impersonal and it unites. sent23: if the ventriloquist is impressive it is not a Husserl and does decoy effusion. sent24: if something is not impressive the fact that it does unite and is not bistroic is not right. sent25: that the ventriloquist does not revolt but it is impersonal is wrong. sent26: the ventriloquist does decoy Sucre. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the flop does not unite is right.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the flop is bistroic.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the ventriloquist is impressive.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the ventriloquist is not a Husserl but it does decoy effusion.; sent3 -> int4: that the ventriloquist is not a Husserl but it does decoy effusion is wrong if it does revolt.; sent20 & sent25 -> int5: the ventriloquist revolts.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the ventriloquist is not a Husserl and does decoy effusion is false.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the flop does unite.; sent16 -> int9: if the flop does unite then it does decoy stoner.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the flop does decoy stoner.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the flop decoys stoner and is a taste.; sent4 -> int12: the flop is not a cluttered if it decoys stoner and it is a taste.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__