the fact that the unsentness happens is not false.
sent1: if the metastaticness but not the deducing Reconstruction occurs the fact that the Bantu does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: the metastaticness occurs if the stoning happens. sent3: if the Bantuness does not occur and the stone does not occur the fact that the unsentness happens is not wrong. sent4: either the patellarness happens or the dimming happens or both. sent5: the annelidness happens. sent6: the fact that the skimming commentator does not occur is not wrong if that the skimming commentator and the obtainment happens is not right. sent7: the spiraling does not occur and/or the counterfeit occurs if the carotidness occurs. sent8: the counterfeit leads to that the spiraling does not occur. sent9: that both the carotidness and the fly occurs is triggered by that the subsidence does not occur. sent10: if the Bantu happens the metastaticness happens. sent11: if the skimming commentator does not occur both the deducing Reconstruction and the annelid happens. sent12: the amenorrheicness does not occur and the subsidence does not occur if the unbarring PLO does not occur. sent13: that the unsentness does not occur is triggered by that the deducing Reconstruction and the metastaticness happens. sent14: that the spiraling does not occur results in that the skimming commentator and/or the annelid occurs. sent15: the improperness happens and/or the Rousseauanness does not occur if the conducting happens. sent16: that the counterfeit happens or that the obtainment does not occur or both is caused by the carotidness. sent17: if the amenorrheicness occurs then the subsidence does not occur. sent18: if the annelid happens then the deducing Reconstruction occurs. sent19: if the improperness does not occur then the unbarring PLO and the amenorrheicness happens. sent20: the improperness does not occur. sent21: that the spiraling does not occur and/or the counterfeit occurs prevents that the spiraling occurs. sent22: both the subsequentness and the conducting happens. sent23: if that the fact that both the non-metastaticness and the Bantu happens does not hold is right that the Bantu does not occur is not wrong. sent24: if the improperness happens the unbarring PLO does not occur. sent25: either the stoning happens or the Bantu occurs or both.
sent25 & sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the metastaticness occurs.; sent18 & sent5 -> int2: the deducing Reconstruction happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the deducing Reconstruction occurs and the metastaticness occurs.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the misconstruing goblet happens.
sent19 & sent20 -> int4: the unbarring PLO happens and the amenorrheicness happens.; int4 -> int5: the amenorrheicness happens.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the subsidence does not occur.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the carotidness happens and the fly occurs.; int7 -> int8: that the carotidness does not occur is not correct.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: either the counterfeit happens or the obtainment does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the unsentness happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the metastaticness but not the deducing Reconstruction occurs the fact that the Bantu does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: the metastaticness occurs if the stoning happens. sent3: if the Bantuness does not occur and the stone does not occur the fact that the unsentness happens is not wrong. sent4: either the patellarness happens or the dimming happens or both. sent5: the annelidness happens. sent6: the fact that the skimming commentator does not occur is not wrong if that the skimming commentator and the obtainment happens is not right. sent7: the spiraling does not occur and/or the counterfeit occurs if the carotidness occurs. sent8: the counterfeit leads to that the spiraling does not occur. sent9: that both the carotidness and the fly occurs is triggered by that the subsidence does not occur. sent10: if the Bantu happens the metastaticness happens. sent11: if the skimming commentator does not occur both the deducing Reconstruction and the annelid happens. sent12: the amenorrheicness does not occur and the subsidence does not occur if the unbarring PLO does not occur. sent13: that the unsentness does not occur is triggered by that the deducing Reconstruction and the metastaticness happens. sent14: that the spiraling does not occur results in that the skimming commentator and/or the annelid occurs. sent15: the improperness happens and/or the Rousseauanness does not occur if the conducting happens. sent16: that the counterfeit happens or that the obtainment does not occur or both is caused by the carotidness. sent17: if the amenorrheicness occurs then the subsidence does not occur. sent18: if the annelid happens then the deducing Reconstruction occurs. sent19: if the improperness does not occur then the unbarring PLO and the amenorrheicness happens. sent20: the improperness does not occur. sent21: that the spiraling does not occur and/or the counterfeit occurs prevents that the spiraling occurs. sent22: both the subsequentness and the conducting happens. sent23: if that the fact that both the non-metastaticness and the Bantu happens does not hold is right that the Bantu does not occur is not wrong. sent24: if the improperness happens the unbarring PLO does not occur. sent25: either the stoning happens or the Bantu occurs or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 & sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the metastaticness occurs.; sent18 & sent5 -> int2: the deducing Reconstruction happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the deducing Reconstruction occurs and the metastaticness occurs.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__