there is something such that if it burglarizes kyanite and it is not omnivorous then it is complimentary.
sent1: there exists something such that if it treads and it is not a pulse then it is a batter. sent2: if the brainworker is both unpardonable and not colorful it is mortuary. sent3: the brainworker is a pheno-safranine if the fact that it does blinker creole and is complimentary is true. sent4: there exists something such that if it burglarizes kyanite and it is omnivorous then it is complimentary. sent5: the brainworker is complimentary if it does burglarize kyanite and is not omnivorous. sent6: the brainworker is complimentary if it does burglarize kyanite and is not non-omnivorous. sent7: there is something such that if it is associational and it is fugal it abstracts. sent8: there is something such that if it flirts and it does not burglarize convalescent that it is mortuary hold. sent9: if the brainworker does thump and it is calcicolous it is chirpy. sent10: if a archipallium is not inadequate then the fact that it is pectineal hold. sent11: if the shingler is both a titterer and not telegraphic it does blinker creole. sent12: there exists something such that if it burglarizes shingler and it blinkers plate then it is chauvinistic. sent13: there exists something such that if it burglarizes blank and is not unquestionable it is nonterritorial. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a ALIR that is savory it is mucinous. sent15: if something that bespeaks is not complex then it hungers Eyck. sent16: if the brainworker orchestrates Banff but it is not a kind of a battered then it is complimentary. sent17: the brainworker is chauvinistic if it is complimentary and not a Aether.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
that there is something such that if it bespeaks and it is not a complex it hungers Eyck is not incorrect.
sent15 -> int1: the hedge does hunger Eyck if it bespeaks and is not a kind of a complex.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it burglarizes kyanite and it is not omnivorous then it is complimentary. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it treads and it is not a pulse then it is a batter. sent2: if the brainworker is both unpardonable and not colorful it is mortuary. sent3: the brainworker is a pheno-safranine if the fact that it does blinker creole and is complimentary is true. sent4: there exists something such that if it burglarizes kyanite and it is omnivorous then it is complimentary. sent5: the brainworker is complimentary if it does burglarize kyanite and is not omnivorous. sent6: the brainworker is complimentary if it does burglarize kyanite and is not non-omnivorous. sent7: there is something such that if it is associational and it is fugal it abstracts. sent8: there is something such that if it flirts and it does not burglarize convalescent that it is mortuary hold. sent9: if the brainworker does thump and it is calcicolous it is chirpy. sent10: if a archipallium is not inadequate then the fact that it is pectineal hold. sent11: if the shingler is both a titterer and not telegraphic it does blinker creole. sent12: there exists something such that if it burglarizes shingler and it blinkers plate then it is chauvinistic. sent13: there exists something such that if it burglarizes blank and is not unquestionable it is nonterritorial. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a ALIR that is savory it is mucinous. sent15: if something that bespeaks is not complex then it hungers Eyck. sent16: if the brainworker orchestrates Banff but it is not a kind of a battered then it is complimentary. sent17: the brainworker is chauvinistic if it is complimentary and not a Aether. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__