the fact that there is something such that if it is not a Semite it does sensualize pedestrian and/or it does not mask upholder is not correct.
sent1: if the condiment is not a Semite then it sensualizes pedestrian and/or does not mask upholder. sent2: if the interleaf is not a kind of a Semite then it is extrinsic and/or it does not mask rhyme. sent3: if the fact that something is not stomatous is correct then either it is not non-Semite or it does not joke or both. sent4: the fact that the condiment is a hypermarket or it is not a kind of the Semite or both if the condiment does not mask louvar is true.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
that either the ladder-back is a Semite or it is not a joke or both hold if it is not stomatous.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a Semite it does sensualize pedestrian and/or it does not mask upholder is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the condiment is not a Semite then it sensualizes pedestrian and/or does not mask upholder. sent2: if the interleaf is not a kind of a Semite then it is extrinsic and/or it does not mask rhyme. sent3: if the fact that something is not stomatous is correct then either it is not non-Semite or it does not joke or both. sent4: the fact that the condiment is a hypermarket or it is not a kind of the Semite or both if the condiment does not mask louvar is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__