that the isthmianness does not occur is prevented by the undulation.
sent1: that the ginning lyric does not occur and the demolition does not occur is not right. sent2: the farandole happens. sent3: the reprising Edirne occurs if the reprising typography does not occur. sent4: the unhappiness does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the rehearsal does not occur and the staring shirtmaker does not occur is incorrect the disowning Hirundo occurs. sent6: the reprising paella happens if the ginning horology occurs. sent7: the fact that that the heaving does not occur and the liturgicalness does not occur is not incorrect is not correct. sent8: both the description and the trebling happens. sent9: if that the reprising asperity does not occur is correct the disowning Shaktism does not occur. sent10: that the ginning horology does not occur and the disowning dissolving does not occur is false. sent11: that the undulation occurs is prevented by that the reprising paella occurs and the waxenness occurs. sent12: the fact that the fact that the clitoralness does not occur hold does not hold. sent13: that the ginning horology but not the disowning dissolving occurs does not hold. sent14: that the referring does not occur and the circuiting does not occur does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the ginning horology does not occur and the disowning dissolving does not occur is not right then the reprising paella occurs. sent16: if both the reprising paella and the waxenness happens the undulation occurs. sent17: the reprising Herzberg happens if that the gin does not occur and the trebling does not occur is not right. sent18: the fact that the twinging does not occur and the radiation does not occur does not hold. sent19: the referring happens. sent20: the tiding occurs and the ovulating happens. sent21: that the reprising forced does not occur causes that the isthmianness occurs. sent22: the allomerousness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the undulation occurs.; sent15 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the reprising paella occurs is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waxenness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the reprising paella and the waxenness occurs.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the undulation does not occur is true.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the waxenness does not occur.;
the fact that that the heaving does not occur and the liturgicalness does not occur is not incorrect is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the isthmianness does not occur is prevented by the undulation. ; $context$ = sent1: that the ginning lyric does not occur and the demolition does not occur is not right. sent2: the farandole happens. sent3: the reprising Edirne occurs if the reprising typography does not occur. sent4: the unhappiness does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the rehearsal does not occur and the staring shirtmaker does not occur is incorrect the disowning Hirundo occurs. sent6: the reprising paella happens if the ginning horology occurs. sent7: the fact that that the heaving does not occur and the liturgicalness does not occur is not incorrect is not correct. sent8: both the description and the trebling happens. sent9: if that the reprising asperity does not occur is correct the disowning Shaktism does not occur. sent10: that the ginning horology does not occur and the disowning dissolving does not occur is false. sent11: that the undulation occurs is prevented by that the reprising paella occurs and the waxenness occurs. sent12: the fact that the fact that the clitoralness does not occur hold does not hold. sent13: that the ginning horology but not the disowning dissolving occurs does not hold. sent14: that the referring does not occur and the circuiting does not occur does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the ginning horology does not occur and the disowning dissolving does not occur is not right then the reprising paella occurs. sent16: if both the reprising paella and the waxenness happens the undulation occurs. sent17: the reprising Herzberg happens if that the gin does not occur and the trebling does not occur is not right. sent18: the fact that the twinging does not occur and the radiation does not occur does not hold. sent19: the referring happens. sent20: the tiding occurs and the ovulating happens. sent21: that the reprising forced does not occur causes that the isthmianness occurs. sent22: the allomerousness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the undulation occurs.; sent15 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the reprising paella occurs is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waxenness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the reprising paella and the waxenness occurs.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the undulation does not occur is true.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the waxenness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__