both the non-pituitaryness and the counterpunch happens.
sent1: if the counterpunch does not occur both the servicing llano and the consumerism happens. sent2: the servicing llano does not occur if the Lusitanianness happens and the flatnessness happens. sent3: that that the servicing bulwark does not occur is brought about by that the Lusitanianness but not the flatnessness occurs is not false. sent4: if the Lusitanianness does not occur then that the pituitariness does not occur and the counterpunch happens is not true. sent5: the consumerism and the lymphoidness happens. sent6: the flatnessness happens. sent7: if the servicing llano does not occur the consumerism does not occur. sent8: that that the pituitariness and the counterpunch happens does not hold if the lymphoidness does not occur is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Lusitanianness happens.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the Lusitanianness occurs and the flatnessness occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the servicing llano does not occur is right.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the consumerism does not occur.; sent5 -> int4: the consumerism occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Lusitanianness does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the servicing bulwark does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = both the non-pituitaryness and the counterpunch happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the counterpunch does not occur both the servicing llano and the consumerism happens. sent2: the servicing llano does not occur if the Lusitanianness happens and the flatnessness happens. sent3: that that the servicing bulwark does not occur is brought about by that the Lusitanianness but not the flatnessness occurs is not false. sent4: if the Lusitanianness does not occur then that the pituitariness does not occur and the counterpunch happens is not true. sent5: the consumerism and the lymphoidness happens. sent6: the flatnessness happens. sent7: if the servicing llano does not occur the consumerism does not occur. sent8: that that the pituitariness and the counterpunch happens does not hold if the lymphoidness does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Lusitanianness happens.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the Lusitanianness occurs and the flatnessness occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the servicing llano does not occur is right.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the consumerism does not occur.; sent5 -> int4: the consumerism occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Lusitanianness does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__