the ash occurs.
sent1: that the score happens and the ballgame occurs prevents that the concealment occurs. sent2: the transubstantiating does not occur if that the spade does not occur but the transubstantiating occurs is incorrect. sent3: if that the anaglyphicness but not the reopening nonintervention happens does not hold the fact that the expensing abducent happens is right. sent4: the shampooing penicillamine does not occur. sent5: the reopening bushwhacker happens. sent6: the concerning Trafalgar does not occur. sent7: the lark does not occur. sent8: the documentary does not occur and/or the shampooing Assamese happens. sent9: that the non-mesialness or the non-genealogicness or both occurs prevents that the instruction does not occur. sent10: either the review occurs or the concerning jar does not occur or both. sent11: if the uninstructiveness and the non-dolomiticness happens then the spading does not occur. sent12: the adornment does not occur if the spade does not occur. sent13: if the consulting occurs the fact that the e-commerce happens hold. sent14: that not the spade but the transubstantiating occurs is not true if the adornment occurs. sent15: the scoring does not occur. sent16: the stress does not occur and/or the sweating happens. sent17: either the difficultness does not occur or the e-commerce occurs or both. sent18: the epentheticness happens. sent19: the non-geophysicalness or the governorship or both occurs. sent20: the non-geophysicalness and/or the governorship prevents that the non-geophysical occurs. sent21: if that the fact that the uninstructiveness but not the dolomiticness occurs is not correct is true then the concerning yoga happens. sent22: the ash occurs if the concerning yoga occurs. sent23: that the adornment does not occur and/or that the deduction does not occur prevents that the roughness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uninstructiveness but not the dolomiticness happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the spade does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the adornment does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the adornment does not occur and/or the deduction does not occur.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the roughness occurs.; sent20 & sent19 -> int5: the geophysicalness does not occur.;
the transubstantiating does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the ash occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the score happens and the ballgame occurs prevents that the concealment occurs. sent2: the transubstantiating does not occur if that the spade does not occur but the transubstantiating occurs is incorrect. sent3: if that the anaglyphicness but not the reopening nonintervention happens does not hold the fact that the expensing abducent happens is right. sent4: the shampooing penicillamine does not occur. sent5: the reopening bushwhacker happens. sent6: the concerning Trafalgar does not occur. sent7: the lark does not occur. sent8: the documentary does not occur and/or the shampooing Assamese happens. sent9: that the non-mesialness or the non-genealogicness or both occurs prevents that the instruction does not occur. sent10: either the review occurs or the concerning jar does not occur or both. sent11: if the uninstructiveness and the non-dolomiticness happens then the spading does not occur. sent12: the adornment does not occur if the spade does not occur. sent13: if the consulting occurs the fact that the e-commerce happens hold. sent14: that not the spade but the transubstantiating occurs is not true if the adornment occurs. sent15: the scoring does not occur. sent16: the stress does not occur and/or the sweating happens. sent17: either the difficultness does not occur or the e-commerce occurs or both. sent18: the epentheticness happens. sent19: the non-geophysicalness or the governorship or both occurs. sent20: the non-geophysicalness and/or the governorship prevents that the non-geophysical occurs. sent21: if that the fact that the uninstructiveness but not the dolomiticness occurs is not correct is true then the concerning yoga happens. sent22: the ash occurs if the concerning yoga occurs. sent23: that the adornment does not occur and/or that the deduction does not occur prevents that the roughness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uninstructiveness but not the dolomiticness happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the spade does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the adornment does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the adornment does not occur and/or the deduction does not occur.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the roughness occurs.; sent20 & sent19 -> int5: the geophysicalness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__