that the stirrup does not hitch Poyang is not false.
sent1: if something is postictal it hitches Poyang. sent2: something does not hitch Poyang if the fact that it does hitch Poyang and is not postictal does not hold. sent3: there exists nothing such that the fact that it does supplicate and it does thirst buffalofish is true. sent4: there exists something such that it does not disjoint. sent5: the fact that the incendiary does hitch Poyang but it is not postictal is not correct if the Maratha is not resident. sent6: that the Maratha is a glare and is a kind of an iodide hold if there is something such that it does not disjoint. sent7: the fact that the AFP is a rapper and it does hitch Poyang does not hold. sent8: the stirrup is postictal if the incendiary is a nonresident. sent9: if something is choric it is low-tech. sent10: if the fact that something thirsts feeding and does single is not correct it does not hitch Poyang. sent11: if that something does not treble sprout and it is not intense is not correct then it is a nonresident. sent12: that the Maratha is intense is correct if the premolar does treble sprout. sent13: the fact that the incendiary does not treble sprout and is not intense is wrong if the Maratha is not a kind of a clipping. sent14: if the stirrup is non-singles it does not hitch Poyang. sent15: if something is not mild it is a kind of a nonresident. sent16: if the premolar is low-tech the fact that it trebles sprout and is not a kind of a clipping hold. sent17: if something that is a glare is low-tech then it is not a clipping. sent18: something does not hitch Poyang if it is not a singles.
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that the stirrup does thirst feeding and is singles is false it does not hitch Poyang.;
that the sprout is corymbose and it is a kilovolt does not hold.
sent2 -> int2: the incendiary does not hitch Poyang if the fact that it hitch Poyang and it is not postictal is wrong.; sent15 -> int3: if that the Maratha is intense is not incorrect it is a nonresident.;
$hypothesis$ = that the stirrup does not hitch Poyang is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is postictal it hitches Poyang. sent2: something does not hitch Poyang if the fact that it does hitch Poyang and is not postictal does not hold. sent3: there exists nothing such that the fact that it does supplicate and it does thirst buffalofish is true. sent4: there exists something such that it does not disjoint. sent5: the fact that the incendiary does hitch Poyang but it is not postictal is not correct if the Maratha is not resident. sent6: that the Maratha is a glare and is a kind of an iodide hold if there is something such that it does not disjoint. sent7: the fact that the AFP is a rapper and it does hitch Poyang does not hold. sent8: the stirrup is postictal if the incendiary is a nonresident. sent9: if something is choric it is low-tech. sent10: if the fact that something thirsts feeding and does single is not correct it does not hitch Poyang. sent11: if that something does not treble sprout and it is not intense is not correct then it is a nonresident. sent12: that the Maratha is intense is correct if the premolar does treble sprout. sent13: the fact that the incendiary does not treble sprout and is not intense is wrong if the Maratha is not a kind of a clipping. sent14: if the stirrup is non-singles it does not hitch Poyang. sent15: if something is not mild it is a kind of a nonresident. sent16: if the premolar is low-tech the fact that it trebles sprout and is not a kind of a clipping hold. sent17: if something that is a glare is low-tech then it is not a clipping. sent18: something does not hitch Poyang if it is not a singles. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that the stirrup does thirst feeding and is singles is false it does not hitch Poyang.; __UNKNOWN__