that the triphammer does not condemn disinterest is right.
sent1: something is a kind of a credulity if that it does unclutter and is not a credulity is false. sent2: the vambrace is not a kind of a Symphalangus if there is something such that it is a kind of a credulity. sent3: something is a credulity if it is not a hospitableness and it is not a sack. sent4: if something is a methapyrilene then the fact that it does unclutter and it is not a credulity does not hold. sent5: the triphammer does not condemn disinterest if there exists something such that either it is not a kind of a cattail or it does not gild sweater or both. sent6: that that the bacon does condemn disinterest and does unclutter is not correct is not false. sent7: something is a cattail and it gilds sweater if it does not condemn disinterest. sent8: the moneybag is not a Symphalangus and it is not a Musgu. sent9: if the fact that the triphammer is not a credulity and it does not condemn disinterest is wrong it condemn disinterest. sent10: something is not a hospitableness and it is not a sack if it is not a cattail. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it does condemn disinterest and it unclutters is wrong then the rhinion does not condemn disinterest. sent12: if the rhinion is not a hospitableness then the bacon is a kind of a hospitableness but it is not a sack. sent13: if the moneybag is not a kind of a Symphalangus and is not a Musgu the rhinion is not a hospitableness. sent14: the bacon is a kind of a methapyrilene that is a characterization. sent15: the ciderpress is not a kind of a cattail if the bacon is a hospitableness and it is a credulity.
sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the rhinion is not a hospitableness.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the bacon is a hospitableness that does not sack.; int2 -> int3: the bacon is a hospitableness.; sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the bacon unclutters but it is not a kind of a credulity is incorrect then it is a credulity.; sent4 -> int5: that the bacon unclutters but it is not a kind of a credulity is wrong if it is a methapyrilene.; sent14 -> int6: the bacon is a methapyrilene.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the bacon does unclutter and is not a credulity does not hold.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the bacon is a credulity.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the bacon is a hospitableness and it is a credulity.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the fact that the ciderpress is not a cattail is correct.; int10 -> int11: the ciderpress is not a cattail and/or it does not gild sweater.; int11 -> int12: something is not a cattail and/or it does not gild sweater.; int12 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the vambrace is not a Symphalangus.
sent3 -> int13: if the moneybag is both not a hospitableness and not a sack it is a kind of a credulity.; sent10 -> int14: if the moneybag is not a cattail then it is not a hospitableness and not a sack.; sent7 -> int15: the rhinion is a cattail that does gild sweater if it does not condemn disinterest.; sent6 -> int16: there is something such that that it does condemn disinterest and it does unclutter is not right.; int16 & sent11 -> int17: the rhinion does not condemn disinterest.; int15 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the rhinion is a cattail and it gilds sweater hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the triphammer does not condemn disinterest is right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a credulity if that it does unclutter and is not a credulity is false. sent2: the vambrace is not a kind of a Symphalangus if there is something such that it is a kind of a credulity. sent3: something is a credulity if it is not a hospitableness and it is not a sack. sent4: if something is a methapyrilene then the fact that it does unclutter and it is not a credulity does not hold. sent5: the triphammer does not condemn disinterest if there exists something such that either it is not a kind of a cattail or it does not gild sweater or both. sent6: that that the bacon does condemn disinterest and does unclutter is not correct is not false. sent7: something is a cattail and it gilds sweater if it does not condemn disinterest. sent8: the moneybag is not a Symphalangus and it is not a Musgu. sent9: if the fact that the triphammer is not a credulity and it does not condemn disinterest is wrong it condemn disinterest. sent10: something is not a hospitableness and it is not a sack if it is not a cattail. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it does condemn disinterest and it unclutters is wrong then the rhinion does not condemn disinterest. sent12: if the rhinion is not a hospitableness then the bacon is a kind of a hospitableness but it is not a sack. sent13: if the moneybag is not a kind of a Symphalangus and is not a Musgu the rhinion is not a hospitableness. sent14: the bacon is a kind of a methapyrilene that is a characterization. sent15: the ciderpress is not a kind of a cattail if the bacon is a hospitableness and it is a credulity. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the rhinion is not a hospitableness.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the bacon is a hospitableness that does not sack.; int2 -> int3: the bacon is a hospitableness.; sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the bacon unclutters but it is not a kind of a credulity is incorrect then it is a credulity.; sent4 -> int5: that the bacon unclutters but it is not a kind of a credulity is wrong if it is a methapyrilene.; sent14 -> int6: the bacon is a methapyrilene.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the bacon does unclutter and is not a credulity does not hold.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the bacon is a credulity.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the bacon is a hospitableness and it is a credulity.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the fact that the ciderpress is not a cattail is correct.; int10 -> int11: the ciderpress is not a cattail and/or it does not gild sweater.; int11 -> int12: something is not a cattail and/or it does not gild sweater.; int12 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__