the sausage is not a hellbender.
sent1: if something is fossorial then it is a hellbender. sent2: if the cigarette is not a buster the fact that the RF is aerophilatelic is not incorrect. sent3: the sausage does not flock Popillia but it is fossorial if the bronchoscope is a ACTH. sent4: either the cigarette is not a buster or it is not kafkaesque or both. sent5: the RF is aerophilatelic if the cigarette is not kafkaesque. sent6: the bronchoscope is a kind of a ACTH if the RF is aerophilatelic.
sent4 & sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the RF is aerophilatelic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the bronchoscope is a ACTH.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the sausage does not flock Popillia and is fossorial.; int3 -> int4: that the sausage is fossorial is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: the sausage is a kind of a hellbender if it is fossorial.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sausage is not a hellbender. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is fossorial then it is a hellbender. sent2: if the cigarette is not a buster the fact that the RF is aerophilatelic is not incorrect. sent3: the sausage does not flock Popillia but it is fossorial if the bronchoscope is a ACTH. sent4: either the cigarette is not a buster or it is not kafkaesque or both. sent5: the RF is aerophilatelic if the cigarette is not kafkaesque. sent6: the bronchoscope is a kind of a ACTH if the RF is aerophilatelic. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the RF is aerophilatelic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the bronchoscope is a ACTH.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the sausage does not flock Popillia and is fossorial.; int3 -> int4: that the sausage is fossorial is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: the sausage is a kind of a hellbender if it is fossorial.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__