the fact that the tribulating sapote occurs if the seigniory occurs does not hold.
sent1: that the Manchurianness does not occur leads to that the Arawakanness happens and the seigniory does not occur. sent2: if the resulting does not occur then the phytotherapy happens and the tolerableness occurs. sent3: the Manchurianness does not occur if the formation occurs. sent4: if that the tribulating inquirer happens hold then either the bestowing does not occur or the tribulating entelechy does not occur or both. sent5: if the tribulating sapote does not occur the ritualisticness happens. sent6: if the pyrography happens the fact that not the clamoring gnomon but the Britannicness occurs is incorrect. sent7: if the asceticism does not occur the expounding and the tribulating sapote occurs. sent8: if the riot occurs the pyrography occurs. sent9: the riot happens if the phytotherapy occurs. sent10: that the bestowing does not occur and/or the tribulating entelechy does not occur leads to that the asceticism does not occur. sent11: that the clamoring gnomon occurs results in that the rebellion does not occur and/or that the seigniory does not occur. sent12: the fact that the lymphaticness happens is true. sent13: if the tribulating sapote does not occur the formation and the ritualisticness occurs. sent14: the result does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the Manchurianness occurs and the monopolizing explosion happens is not right the monopolizing explosion does not occur. sent16: both the collectiveness and the non-syllabicness happens if the monopolizing treatise happens. sent17: if the syllabicness does not occur the stratus but not the postponement happens. sent18: if that the clamoring gnomon does not occur and the Britannicness happens is not true the fact that the clamoring gnomon happens is correct. sent19: if the postponement does not occur then the tribulating inquirer happens. sent20: if the fact that the Arawakanness does not occur hold that both the Manchurianness and the monopolizing explosion happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seigniory occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tribulating sapote does not occur.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: both the formation and the ritualisticness happens.; int1 -> int2: the formation happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the Manchurianness does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the Arawakanness but not the seigniory occurs.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the seigniory does not occur is not wrong.; assump1 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the tribulating sapote occurs.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the expounding occurs and the monopolizing explosion does not occur.
sent2 & sent14 -> int8: the phytotherapy occurs and the tolerableness happens.; int8 -> int9: the phytotherapy occurs.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the rioting happens.; sent8 & int10 -> int11: the pyrography occurs.; sent6 & int11 -> int12: that not the clamoring gnomon but the Britannicness happens is not correct.; sent18 & int12 -> int13: the clamoring gnomon occurs.; sent11 & int13 -> int14: the rebellion does not occur and/or the seigniory does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tribulating sapote occurs if the seigniory occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Manchurianness does not occur leads to that the Arawakanness happens and the seigniory does not occur. sent2: if the resulting does not occur then the phytotherapy happens and the tolerableness occurs. sent3: the Manchurianness does not occur if the formation occurs. sent4: if that the tribulating inquirer happens hold then either the bestowing does not occur or the tribulating entelechy does not occur or both. sent5: if the tribulating sapote does not occur the ritualisticness happens. sent6: if the pyrography happens the fact that not the clamoring gnomon but the Britannicness occurs is incorrect. sent7: if the asceticism does not occur the expounding and the tribulating sapote occurs. sent8: if the riot occurs the pyrography occurs. sent9: the riot happens if the phytotherapy occurs. sent10: that the bestowing does not occur and/or the tribulating entelechy does not occur leads to that the asceticism does not occur. sent11: that the clamoring gnomon occurs results in that the rebellion does not occur and/or that the seigniory does not occur. sent12: the fact that the lymphaticness happens is true. sent13: if the tribulating sapote does not occur the formation and the ritualisticness occurs. sent14: the result does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the Manchurianness occurs and the monopolizing explosion happens is not right the monopolizing explosion does not occur. sent16: both the collectiveness and the non-syllabicness happens if the monopolizing treatise happens. sent17: if the syllabicness does not occur the stratus but not the postponement happens. sent18: if that the clamoring gnomon does not occur and the Britannicness happens is not true the fact that the clamoring gnomon happens is correct. sent19: if the postponement does not occur then the tribulating inquirer happens. sent20: if the fact that the Arawakanness does not occur hold that both the Manchurianness and the monopolizing explosion happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seigniory occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tribulating sapote does not occur.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: both the formation and the ritualisticness happens.; int1 -> int2: the formation happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the Manchurianness does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the Arawakanness but not the seigniory occurs.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the seigniory does not occur is not wrong.; assump1 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the tribulating sapote occurs.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__