that the congratulation does not occur if the accreting happens does not hold.
sent1: the accrediting BIN does not occur. sent2: the transfusing Cage occurs. sent3: if both the unlikeliness and the lunge happens then the filling giraffe does not occur. sent4: the fact that if the accreting happens the congratulation happens is right. sent5: not the apiarianness but the channelizing happens. sent6: the motoring happens. sent7: that the transfusing superscript does not occur causes that the congratulation but not the bastardization happens. sent8: the cosmopolitanness happens and the fingerlessness happens. sent9: the pupillariness yields that the transfusing gibbon occurs. sent10: the fact that the proposing debilitation happens hold. sent11: if the fingerlessness happens then that not the nestling but the accrediting Togolese occurs is not correct. sent12: that the proposing debilitation does not occur leads to that the frontalness and the accreting happens. sent13: the transfusing superscript occurs. sent14: the cluttering does not occur and the frontalness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the chertiness does not occur and the accrediting homestretch happens is not correct the transfusing superscript does not occur. sent16: the filling funeral-residence occurs. sent17: that the bastardization does not occur is caused by that the accreting and the proposing debilitation happens. sent18: that that not the bastardization but the congratulation occurs is incorrect is true if the transfusing superscript happens. sent19: the brotherliness happens. sent20: if the accrediting jessamine occurs then the fact that the non-chertiness and the accrediting homestretch happens is wrong. sent21: not the argument but the intestateness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accreting occurs.; assump1 & sent10 -> int1: the accreting and the proposing debilitation happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the bastardization does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the congratulation happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: not the bastardization but the congratulation occurs.; sent18 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the bastardization does not occur and the congratulation happens does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the congratulation does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the frontal happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the congratulation does not occur if the accreting happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the accrediting BIN does not occur. sent2: the transfusing Cage occurs. sent3: if both the unlikeliness and the lunge happens then the filling giraffe does not occur. sent4: the fact that if the accreting happens the congratulation happens is right. sent5: not the apiarianness but the channelizing happens. sent6: the motoring happens. sent7: that the transfusing superscript does not occur causes that the congratulation but not the bastardization happens. sent8: the cosmopolitanness happens and the fingerlessness happens. sent9: the pupillariness yields that the transfusing gibbon occurs. sent10: the fact that the proposing debilitation happens hold. sent11: if the fingerlessness happens then that not the nestling but the accrediting Togolese occurs is not correct. sent12: that the proposing debilitation does not occur leads to that the frontalness and the accreting happens. sent13: the transfusing superscript occurs. sent14: the cluttering does not occur and the frontalness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the chertiness does not occur and the accrediting homestretch happens is not correct the transfusing superscript does not occur. sent16: the filling funeral-residence occurs. sent17: that the bastardization does not occur is caused by that the accreting and the proposing debilitation happens. sent18: that that not the bastardization but the congratulation occurs is incorrect is true if the transfusing superscript happens. sent19: the brotherliness happens. sent20: if the accrediting jessamine occurs then the fact that the non-chertiness and the accrediting homestretch happens is wrong. sent21: not the argument but the intestateness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accreting occurs.; assump1 & sent10 -> int1: the accreting and the proposing debilitation happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the bastardization does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the congratulation happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: not the bastardization but the congratulation occurs.; sent18 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the bastardization does not occur and the congratulation happens does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the congratulation does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__