the dallisgrass is unreactive.
sent1: if there are non-low-level things then the garmentmaker refines reharmonization and does budget peaceableness. sent2: if something is low-level and/or it budgets peaceableness then it is not unreactive. sent3: the silicon is not a kind of a Lancastrian if it does not regret. sent4: the hater is disciplinary. sent5: something that budgets peaceableness is disciplinary. sent6: the sneeze is a hydroxychloroquine. sent7: something is not a Lancastrian if it is not non-tortious. sent8: the serendipity is not azotemic if the fact that the payer is not cool and not non-neurophysiological is incorrect. sent9: the dallisgrass is disciplinary if the hater is a hydroxychloroquine. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it does not refine shrink-wrap hold the fact that the rye does spring-clean is right. sent11: the silicon is not a seeking if the twins is a kind of a resuscitation and is a clearance. sent12: the hater is not low-level if there is something such that that it is low-level and it is not a kind of a hydroxychloroquine does not hold. sent13: the twins is a skip and is not a eosinophil. sent14: if something is not Lancastrian and it is not a seeking then it is not unreactive. sent15: that the payer is both not cool and neurophysiological does not hold. sent16: if something does not refine reharmonization it is not disciplinary. sent17: something that is not axonal is not a ripeness. sent18: the fact that something budgets peaceableness hold if it refines reharmonization. sent19: the hater is a hydroxychloroquine. sent20: if there exists something such that it is not azotemic the silicon is tortious and/or it does not regret. sent21: if that the rye spring-cleans is not incorrect then the twins is a resuscitation. sent22: if something that is a skip is not a eosinophil then it is a clearance. sent23: the fact that the utilitarian is low-level but it is not a kind of a hydroxychloroquine is incorrect if that there exists something such that it is not unreactive hold. sent24: the hater is not low-level. sent25: there is something such that it does not refine shrink-wrap.
sent16 -> int1: the dallisgrass is not disciplinary if it does not refine reharmonization.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dallisgrass does not refine reharmonization.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dallisgrass is not disciplinary.; sent9 & sent19 -> int3: the dallisgrass is disciplinary.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the dallisgrass refines reharmonization.; sent18 -> int6: the dallisgrass budgets peaceableness if it refines reharmonization.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the dallisgrass budgets peaceableness.; int7 -> int8: the dallisgrass is low-level and/or it budgets peaceableness.; sent2 -> int9: if either the dallisgrass is low-level or it budgets peaceableness or both it is not unreactive.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the garmentmaker is not non-disciplinary.
sent5 -> int10: the garmentmaker is disciplinary if it does budget peaceableness.; sent14 -> int11: the silicon is not unreactive if it is not a Lancastrian and not a seeking.; sent8 & sent15 -> int12: the fact that the serendipity is not azotemic is right.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not azotemic.; int13 & sent20 -> int14: the silicon is tortious or it does not regret or both.; sent7 -> int15: the silicon is not a Lancastrian if it is tortious.; int14 & int15 & sent3 -> int16: the silicon is not a Lancastrian.; sent25 & sent10 -> int17: the rye does spring-clean.; sent21 & int17 -> int18: the twins is a kind of a resuscitation.; sent22 -> int19: that the twins is a clearance is not incorrect if it is both a skip and not a eosinophil.; int19 & sent13 -> int20: the twins is a clearance.; int18 & int20 -> int21: the twins is a resuscitation and a clearance.; sent11 & int21 -> int22: the silicon does not seek.; int16 & int22 -> int23: the fact that the silicon is not a Lancastrian and it is not a seeking is right.; int11 & int23 -> int24: the silicon is not unreactive.; int24 -> int25: there exists something such that the fact that it is not unreactive is not incorrect.; int25 & sent23 -> int26: that that the utilitarian is low-level but it is not a hydroxychloroquine is not correct is right.; int26 -> int27: there is something such that the fact that it is low-level thing that is not a hydroxychloroquine is not true.; int27 & sent12 -> int28: the hater is not low-level.; int28 -> int29: something is not low-level.; int29 & sent1 -> int30: the garmentmaker does refine reharmonization and it budgets peaceableness.; int30 -> int31: the garmentmaker does budget peaceableness.; int10 & int31 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the dallisgrass is unreactive. ; $context$ = sent1: if there are non-low-level things then the garmentmaker refines reharmonization and does budget peaceableness. sent2: if something is low-level and/or it budgets peaceableness then it is not unreactive. sent3: the silicon is not a kind of a Lancastrian if it does not regret. sent4: the hater is disciplinary. sent5: something that budgets peaceableness is disciplinary. sent6: the sneeze is a hydroxychloroquine. sent7: something is not a Lancastrian if it is not non-tortious. sent8: the serendipity is not azotemic if the fact that the payer is not cool and not non-neurophysiological is incorrect. sent9: the dallisgrass is disciplinary if the hater is a hydroxychloroquine. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it does not refine shrink-wrap hold the fact that the rye does spring-clean is right. sent11: the silicon is not a seeking if the twins is a kind of a resuscitation and is a clearance. sent12: the hater is not low-level if there is something such that that it is low-level and it is not a kind of a hydroxychloroquine does not hold. sent13: the twins is a skip and is not a eosinophil. sent14: if something is not Lancastrian and it is not a seeking then it is not unreactive. sent15: that the payer is both not cool and neurophysiological does not hold. sent16: if something does not refine reharmonization it is not disciplinary. sent17: something that is not axonal is not a ripeness. sent18: the fact that something budgets peaceableness hold if it refines reharmonization. sent19: the hater is a hydroxychloroquine. sent20: if there exists something such that it is not azotemic the silicon is tortious and/or it does not regret. sent21: if that the rye spring-cleans is not incorrect then the twins is a resuscitation. sent22: if something that is a skip is not a eosinophil then it is a clearance. sent23: the fact that the utilitarian is low-level but it is not a kind of a hydroxychloroquine is incorrect if that there exists something such that it is not unreactive hold. sent24: the hater is not low-level. sent25: there is something such that it does not refine shrink-wrap. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the dallisgrass is not disciplinary if it does not refine reharmonization.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dallisgrass does not refine reharmonization.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dallisgrass is not disciplinary.; sent9 & sent19 -> int3: the dallisgrass is disciplinary.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the dallisgrass refines reharmonization.; sent18 -> int6: the dallisgrass budgets peaceableness if it refines reharmonization.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the dallisgrass budgets peaceableness.; int7 -> int8: the dallisgrass is low-level and/or it budgets peaceableness.; sent2 -> int9: if either the dallisgrass is low-level or it budgets peaceableness or both it is not unreactive.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__