the honey is unopposable if the leaf-cutter is a sweatband.
sent1: something is not a kind of a sweatband and is not unopposable if it is not a kind of a Halcyon. sent2: the fact that that the honey does accumulate and is unopposable does not hold is true. sent3: the Latino does accumulate if there is something such that it bonds. sent4: something does not hand adolescence and does accumulate. sent5: the Choctaw accumulates if that the honey does accumulates hold. sent6: if there exists something such that it does hand adolescence then the honey is unopposable. sent7: if something is a sweatband then the fact that it does not hand adolescence and it accumulates does not hold. sent8: if something does disabuse peba then the honey is nonreflective. sent9: the leaf-cutter is a sweatband if there is something such that that it is not unopposable and does hand adolescence does not hold. sent10: if something is not a sweatband and it is not unopposable then it does accumulate. sent11: the tine is unopposable. sent12: there is something such that it is nonlinear. sent13: that something hands adolescence and does accumulate is not correct if it is a kind of a sweatband. sent14: that the leaf-cutter hands adolescence and it does accumulate is not true.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the leaf-cutter does not hand adolescence and does accumulate does not hold if it is a kind of a sweatband.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leaf-cutter is a sweatband.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that that the leaf-cutter does not hand adolescence but it does accumulate is wrong is not incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does not hand adolescence and it accumulates is not correct.;
the Choctaw accumulates.
sent10 -> int4: that the honey does accumulate is true if it is not a sweatband and not unopposable.; sent1 -> int5: the honey is not a kind of a sweatband and is not unopposable if it is not a Halcyon.;
$hypothesis$ = the honey is unopposable if the leaf-cutter is a sweatband. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a sweatband and is not unopposable if it is not a kind of a Halcyon. sent2: the fact that that the honey does accumulate and is unopposable does not hold is true. sent3: the Latino does accumulate if there is something such that it bonds. sent4: something does not hand adolescence and does accumulate. sent5: the Choctaw accumulates if that the honey does accumulates hold. sent6: if there exists something such that it does hand adolescence then the honey is unopposable. sent7: if something is a sweatband then the fact that it does not hand adolescence and it accumulates does not hold. sent8: if something does disabuse peba then the honey is nonreflective. sent9: the leaf-cutter is a sweatband if there is something such that that it is not unopposable and does hand adolescence does not hold. sent10: if something is not a sweatband and it is not unopposable then it does accumulate. sent11: the tine is unopposable. sent12: there is something such that it is nonlinear. sent13: that something hands adolescence and does accumulate is not correct if it is a kind of a sweatband. sent14: that the leaf-cutter hands adolescence and it does accumulate is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the leaf-cutter does not hand adolescence and does accumulate does not hold if it is a kind of a sweatband.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leaf-cutter is a sweatband.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that that the leaf-cutter does not hand adolescence but it does accumulate is wrong is not incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does not hand adolescence and it accumulates is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__