the monophonicness happens.
sent1: the juggle does not occur if the inflection happens or the debacle happens or both. sent2: the surging does not occur if that not the juxtaposition but the relacing placoderm happens is incorrect. sent3: if the surge does not occur and the juggle does not occur then the propagation occurs. sent4: that that the juxtaposition does not occur and the relacing placoderm happens hold does not hold. sent5: the whiting does not occur. sent6: that the powderizing occurs triggers that both the non-monophonicness and the inflection happens. sent7: if either the inflection does not occur or the powderizing happens or both then the whiting occurs. sent8: the fact that the powderizing occurs if that the whiting does not occur and/or the debacle does not occur is not right is right. sent9: if the propagation occurs then the Appalachianness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inflection does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the inflection does not occur and/or the powderizing happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the whitingness occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the inflection occurs.; int4 -> int5: either the inflection happens or the debacle happens or both.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the juggling does not occur.; sent2 & sent4 -> int7: the surging does not occur.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the surge does not occur and the juggling does not occur.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the propagation occurs.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the Appalachianness occurs.;
the monophonicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the monophonicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the juggle does not occur if the inflection happens or the debacle happens or both. sent2: the surging does not occur if that not the juxtaposition but the relacing placoderm happens is incorrect. sent3: if the surge does not occur and the juggle does not occur then the propagation occurs. sent4: that that the juxtaposition does not occur and the relacing placoderm happens hold does not hold. sent5: the whiting does not occur. sent6: that the powderizing occurs triggers that both the non-monophonicness and the inflection happens. sent7: if either the inflection does not occur or the powderizing happens or both then the whiting occurs. sent8: the fact that the powderizing occurs if that the whiting does not occur and/or the debacle does not occur is not right is right. sent9: if the propagation occurs then the Appalachianness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inflection does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the inflection does not occur and/or the powderizing happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the whitingness occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the inflection occurs.; int4 -> int5: either the inflection happens or the debacle happens or both.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the juggling does not occur.; sent2 & sent4 -> int7: the surging does not occur.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the surge does not occur and the juggling does not occur.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the propagation occurs.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the Appalachianness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__