that the wood-fern does not invoke EDP but it is a kind of a stein does not hold.
sent1: if the viscose does guess topolatry the wood-fern does not invoke EDP but it is a stein. sent2: if something does guess phone-in that it does not invoke EDP and is a stein is not true. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it ignites is not wrong. sent4: the viscose guesses phone-in and provides. sent5: the viscose does guess phone-in if the lost-and-found does not ignite and does not provide. sent6: the fact that the reliever is a goldmine is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the blanc does guess topolatry but it is not a Zambian is wrong if there is something such that it is a kind of a goldmine. sent8: the viscose ignites if it does provide. sent9: the lost-and-found is not a goldmine if something that does not guess topolatry does ignite. sent10: that the lost-and-found is a goldmine is not false.
sent4 -> int1: the viscose does provide.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the viscose does ignite.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the viscose does not guess topolatry.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the viscose does not guess topolatry and ignites.; int3 -> int4: that something does not guess topolatry but it does ignite is right.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the lost-and-found is not a goldmine.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the viscose does guess topolatry.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the wood-fern does not invoke EDP but it is a stein is not correct.
sent2 -> int8: the fact that the wood-fern does not invoke EDP and is a stein is not true if it does guess phone-in.; sent6 -> int9: something is a goldmine.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the fact that the blanc does guess topolatry but it is not a Zambian does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it guesses topolatry and it is not a Zambian is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the wood-fern does not invoke EDP but it is a kind of a stein does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the viscose does guess topolatry the wood-fern does not invoke EDP but it is a stein. sent2: if something does guess phone-in that it does not invoke EDP and is a stein is not true. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it ignites is not wrong. sent4: the viscose guesses phone-in and provides. sent5: the viscose does guess phone-in if the lost-and-found does not ignite and does not provide. sent6: the fact that the reliever is a goldmine is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the blanc does guess topolatry but it is not a Zambian is wrong if there is something such that it is a kind of a goldmine. sent8: the viscose ignites if it does provide. sent9: the lost-and-found is not a goldmine if something that does not guess topolatry does ignite. sent10: that the lost-and-found is a goldmine is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the viscose does provide.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the viscose does ignite.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the viscose does not guess topolatry.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the viscose does not guess topolatry and ignites.; int3 -> int4: that something does not guess topolatry but it does ignite is right.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the lost-and-found is not a goldmine.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the viscose does guess topolatry.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__