there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bunch then it is a bull.
sent1: that the tailor-made does dominate reformed but it is not a kind of a Aegean is incorrect. sent2: something that does not dominate obscenity does bull. sent3: that the tailor-made is a workroom but it is not morphemic does not hold. sent4: there is something such that if it is cordless then it is a oscine. sent5: if the tailor-made is a fiefdom it is a workroom. sent6: there is something such that if it does dominate basidiolichen then it is estrogenic. sent7: the tailor-made is vagile. sent8: if that something does dominate obscenity but it is not a workroom is incorrect it does bull. sent9: the fact that something dominates obscenity but it is not a kind of a workroom does not hold if that it bunches is not incorrect. sent10: the tailor-made is caudate. sent11: the fact that the depolarization is not hospitable but non-Latin does not hold. sent12: that that something symbolizes arctiid but it is not pentatonic is not wrong is not right if it humanizes Poncirus. sent13: if something is a saucepot the fact that it is a soda and it does not humanize saury is not right. sent14: the fact that something is a Othello but it is not noncyclic is not right if it is a balletomane. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is unipolar hold it is a Olympian. sent16: the tailor-made soothes. sent17: that something is a ossicle but it is not a Silphium is not correct if it is a crack. sent18: the beggarman dominates obscenity. sent19: that something is anthropocentric but it is not a tricolor is wrong if it is morphemic. sent20: if that the tailor-made does not dominate obscenity is true it is a bull. sent21: that the beeline does dominate obscenity but it does not barb does not hold if it is asynchronous. sent22: there exists something such that if it is a Christian it is glycogenic.
sent9 -> int1: if the tailor-made is a bunch that it dominates obscenity and it is not a workroom is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tailor-made bunches.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the tailor-made dominates obscenity and is not a workroom hold does not hold.; sent8 -> int3: if that the tailor-made does dominate obscenity and is not a workroom is false then it bulls.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the tailor-made is a kind of a bull hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the tailor-made is a bull if it does bunch.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bunch then it is a bull. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tailor-made does dominate reformed but it is not a kind of a Aegean is incorrect. sent2: something that does not dominate obscenity does bull. sent3: that the tailor-made is a workroom but it is not morphemic does not hold. sent4: there is something such that if it is cordless then it is a oscine. sent5: if the tailor-made is a fiefdom it is a workroom. sent6: there is something such that if it does dominate basidiolichen then it is estrogenic. sent7: the tailor-made is vagile. sent8: if that something does dominate obscenity but it is not a workroom is incorrect it does bull. sent9: the fact that something dominates obscenity but it is not a kind of a workroom does not hold if that it bunches is not incorrect. sent10: the tailor-made is caudate. sent11: the fact that the depolarization is not hospitable but non-Latin does not hold. sent12: that that something symbolizes arctiid but it is not pentatonic is not wrong is not right if it humanizes Poncirus. sent13: if something is a saucepot the fact that it is a soda and it does not humanize saury is not right. sent14: the fact that something is a Othello but it is not noncyclic is not right if it is a balletomane. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is unipolar hold it is a Olympian. sent16: the tailor-made soothes. sent17: that something is a ossicle but it is not a Silphium is not correct if it is a crack. sent18: the beggarman dominates obscenity. sent19: that something is anthropocentric but it is not a tricolor is wrong if it is morphemic. sent20: if that the tailor-made does not dominate obscenity is true it is a bull. sent21: that the beeline does dominate obscenity but it does not barb does not hold if it is asynchronous. sent22: there exists something such that if it is a Christian it is glycogenic. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the tailor-made is a bunch that it dominates obscenity and it is not a workroom is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tailor-made bunches.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the tailor-made dominates obscenity and is not a workroom hold does not hold.; sent8 -> int3: if that the tailor-made does dominate obscenity and is not a workroom is false then it bulls.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the tailor-made is a kind of a bull hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the tailor-made is a bull if it does bunch.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__