that the yodeller is a buttocks and does not dabble is wrong.
sent1: if something that is not geophytic is not a kind of a erasure the shaggymane is not a coo. sent2: if the shaggymane does wheel bard then it does twin. sent3: that the yodeller is a buttocks that does not dabble does not hold if something is not euphonious. sent4: the bowhead dabbles and is a buttocks. sent5: if something is a kind of a erasure then it is not geophytic and it is a kind of a Leymus. sent6: the fact that if the fact that the bladder is a Leymus hold the puttyroot is not geophytic and it is not a kind of a erasure is not wrong. sent7: if something is not euphonious and/or it is a Leymus then the bladder is a Leymus. sent8: something is non-euphonious if it is a kind of non-geophytic a Leymus. sent9: the bladder is not euphonious but it is geophytic if it is a homosexual. sent10: if the bladder is euphonious then it coos. sent11: the fact that the yodeller is a Leymus is not incorrect if there exists something such that it does dabble. sent12: the shaggymane is Homeric if something is porcine. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a kind of a antinode and it is not porcine is true is incorrect then the shaggymane is Homeric. sent14: there exists something such that that it is not a antinode and is not porcine does not hold. sent15: if the shaggymane is not a coo then the cachalot is Homeric and is a homosexual. sent16: if the puttyroot is a kind of a coo then the bladder is a erasure. sent17: if that the puttyroot is a kind of a homosexual is not wrong then it is a kind of a coo. sent18: if the shaggymane is Homeric the puttyroot is a homosexual.
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the shaggymane is Homeric.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the puttyroot is homosexual is not incorrect.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the puttyroot coos.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the bladder is a erasure.; sent5 -> int5: the bladder is both not geophytic and a Leymus if that it is a erasure hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bladder is not geophytic but it is a Leymus.; sent8 -> int7: the bladder is not euphonious if it is a kind of non-geophytic a Leymus.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bladder is not euphonious.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not euphonious.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the cachalot is a homosexual.
sent4 -> int10: the bowhead dabbles.; int10 -> int11: something does dabble.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the yodeller is a Leymus.; int12 -> int13: the yodeller is not euphonious and/or is a Leymus.; int13 -> int14: something is not euphonious or it is a kind of a Leymus or both.; int14 & sent7 -> int15: the bladder is a Leymus.; sent6 & int15 -> int16: the puttyroot is not geophytic and it is not a erasure.; int16 -> int17: something is both not geophytic and not a erasure.; int17 & sent1 -> int18: the fact that the shaggymane is not a kind of a coo is not incorrect.; sent15 & int18 -> int19: the cachalot is not non-Homeric and it is a homosexual.; int19 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the yodeller is a buttocks and does not dabble is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not geophytic is not a kind of a erasure the shaggymane is not a coo. sent2: if the shaggymane does wheel bard then it does twin. sent3: that the yodeller is a buttocks that does not dabble does not hold if something is not euphonious. sent4: the bowhead dabbles and is a buttocks. sent5: if something is a kind of a erasure then it is not geophytic and it is a kind of a Leymus. sent6: the fact that if the fact that the bladder is a Leymus hold the puttyroot is not geophytic and it is not a kind of a erasure is not wrong. sent7: if something is not euphonious and/or it is a Leymus then the bladder is a Leymus. sent8: something is non-euphonious if it is a kind of non-geophytic a Leymus. sent9: the bladder is not euphonious but it is geophytic if it is a homosexual. sent10: if the bladder is euphonious then it coos. sent11: the fact that the yodeller is a Leymus is not incorrect if there exists something such that it does dabble. sent12: the shaggymane is Homeric if something is porcine. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a kind of a antinode and it is not porcine is true is incorrect then the shaggymane is Homeric. sent14: there exists something such that that it is not a antinode and is not porcine does not hold. sent15: if the shaggymane is not a coo then the cachalot is Homeric and is a homosexual. sent16: if the puttyroot is a kind of a coo then the bladder is a erasure. sent17: if that the puttyroot is a kind of a homosexual is not wrong then it is a kind of a coo. sent18: if the shaggymane is Homeric the puttyroot is a homosexual. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the shaggymane is Homeric.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the puttyroot is homosexual is not incorrect.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the puttyroot coos.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the bladder is a erasure.; sent5 -> int5: the bladder is both not geophytic and a Leymus if that it is a erasure hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bladder is not geophytic but it is a Leymus.; sent8 -> int7: the bladder is not euphonious if it is a kind of non-geophytic a Leymus.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bladder is not euphonious.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not euphonious.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__