the necromancer is a Lamarckian.
sent1: the fact that that the necromancer is not a sulfacetamide but it is a pinion does not hold if the enkephalin reflectorizes transcriber is right. sent2: The fact that the transcriber does not reflectorize enkephalin is not correct. sent3: something is Lamarckian if the fact that it is not a sulfacetamide and does pinion is false. sent4: if something does reflectorize transcriber it is a kind of a sulfacetamide.
sent3 -> int1: the necromancer is a Lamarckian if that it is not a sulfacetamide but a pinion does not hold.;
the lithographer is a sulfacetamide.
sent4 -> int2: the lithographer is a kind of a sulfacetamide if it reflectorizes transcriber.;
$hypothesis$ = the necromancer is a Lamarckian. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the necromancer is not a sulfacetamide but it is a pinion does not hold if the enkephalin reflectorizes transcriber is right. sent2: The fact that the transcriber does not reflectorize enkephalin is not correct. sent3: something is Lamarckian if the fact that it is not a sulfacetamide and does pinion is false. sent4: if something does reflectorize transcriber it is a kind of a sulfacetamide. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the necromancer is a Lamarckian if that it is not a sulfacetamide but a pinion does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__