the perisperm is a chink.
sent1: the fact that something is a chink and a polonaise is wrong if it does not exsiccate supplier. sent2: if the filovirus is not non-Ionic then the maisonette equals. sent3: if the portrait is a mouth that the filovirus is a pistillode is true. sent4: that something is not a kind of a pistillode but it is a kind of a mouth is not correct if the fact that it is Ionic hold. sent5: if there exists something such that it does flounder filovirus the mudskipper is Ionic but it does not equal. sent6: the mudskipper does not churn Al-hakim. sent7: The Al-hakim does not churn mudskipper. sent8: if something is a pistillode it is Ionic. sent9: the fact that the portrait flounders filovirus hold if the filovirus is not ursine and churns Al-hakim. sent10: if that something does flounder iproclozide but it is not a kind of a detonator is false then it does not exsiccate supplier. sent11: if the fact that the maisonette equals is not wrong then the perisperm is a chink. sent12: the sunroof does not exsiccate supplier if the fact that the mudskipper is not a kind of a pistillode and is a kind of a mouth is not right. sent13: if the mudskipper does not churn Al-hakim then it does flounder filovirus and does exsiccate supplier. sent14: the fact that the mudskipper flounders iproclozide and is not a detonator does not hold if the sunroof is not a polonaise. sent15: the filovirus is not ursine and does churn Al-hakim.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunroof is not a polonaise.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: that the mudskipper flounders iproclozide but it is not a detonator is wrong.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the fact that the mudskipper does flounder iproclozide and is not a detonator is wrong is not false it does not exsiccate supplier.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mudskipper does not exsiccate supplier.; sent13 & sent6 -> int4: the mudskipper does flounder filovirus and it does exsiccate supplier.; int4 -> int5: the mudskipper exsiccates supplier.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the sunroof is a kind of a polonaise.; sent8 -> int8: the filovirus is Ionic if it is a pistillode.;
the fact that the perisperm does not chink is right.
sent1 -> int9: that the sunroof is a chink and a polonaise does not hold if it does not exsiccate supplier.; sent4 -> int10: if that the fact that the mudskipper is not Ionic is false hold that it is not a pistillode but a mouth is wrong.; sent9 & sent15 -> int11: the portrait flounders filovirus.; int11 -> int12: something flounders filovirus.; int12 & sent5 -> int13: the fact that the mudskipper is Ionic and does not equal hold.; int13 -> int14: the mudskipper is Ionic.; int10 & int14 -> int15: that the mudskipper is not a pistillode but it does mouth does not hold.; sent12 & int15 -> int16: the sunroof does not exsiccate supplier.; int9 & int16 -> int17: that the sunroof does chink and it is a polonaise is incorrect.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a chink and is a polonaise is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the perisperm is a chink. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a chink and a polonaise is wrong if it does not exsiccate supplier. sent2: if the filovirus is not non-Ionic then the maisonette equals. sent3: if the portrait is a mouth that the filovirus is a pistillode is true. sent4: that something is not a kind of a pistillode but it is a kind of a mouth is not correct if the fact that it is Ionic hold. sent5: if there exists something such that it does flounder filovirus the mudskipper is Ionic but it does not equal. sent6: the mudskipper does not churn Al-hakim. sent7: The Al-hakim does not churn mudskipper. sent8: if something is a pistillode it is Ionic. sent9: the fact that the portrait flounders filovirus hold if the filovirus is not ursine and churns Al-hakim. sent10: if that something does flounder iproclozide but it is not a kind of a detonator is false then it does not exsiccate supplier. sent11: if the fact that the maisonette equals is not wrong then the perisperm is a chink. sent12: the sunroof does not exsiccate supplier if the fact that the mudskipper is not a kind of a pistillode and is a kind of a mouth is not right. sent13: if the mudskipper does not churn Al-hakim then it does flounder filovirus and does exsiccate supplier. sent14: the fact that the mudskipper flounders iproclozide and is not a detonator does not hold if the sunroof is not a polonaise. sent15: the filovirus is not ursine and does churn Al-hakim. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunroof is not a polonaise.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: that the mudskipper flounders iproclozide but it is not a detonator is wrong.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the fact that the mudskipper does flounder iproclozide and is not a detonator is wrong is not false it does not exsiccate supplier.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mudskipper does not exsiccate supplier.; sent13 & sent6 -> int4: the mudskipper does flounder filovirus and it does exsiccate supplier.; int4 -> int5: the mudskipper exsiccates supplier.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the sunroof is a kind of a polonaise.; sent8 -> int8: the filovirus is Ionic if it is a pistillode.; __UNKNOWN__