the armilla is a piezometer but it is not palpatory.
sent1: something does realign duchess. sent2: that the armilla does not absent hold if the giardia is not a reverse and/or it does not absent. sent3: the bandoneon is not a prodigy if something realigns duchess. sent4: something is not aciculate. sent5: the giardia is not abdominovesical if it does not advance. sent6: if the giardia advances that the football is not absent but it realigns paralanguage hold. sent7: that the bandoneon is not nonadhesive if the bandoneon is Aboriginal is not incorrect. sent8: the armilla is not a kind of a prodigy. sent9: if something does not absent the fact that it is not non-abdominovesical is correct. sent10: the armilla is not a Veratrum. sent11: if a abdominovesical thing is a kind of a prodigy it does not realign duchess. sent12: something is not palpatory if it is not a reverse. sent13: if the bandoneon is an advance then the armilla is a kind of a prodigy. sent14: if something that is abdominovesical is not a prodigy the giardia is an advance. sent15: if the bandoneon does realign paralanguage but it is not canonic then it advances. sent16: that something is both a piezometer and not palpatory is not right if it does not realign duchess. sent17: the bandoneon realigns paralanguage but it is not canonic if it is not nonadhesive. sent18: if the football is a kind of non-absent thing that does realign paralanguage the armilla is not a kind of a reverse. sent19: a non-reverse thing is a piezometer that is not palpatory. sent20: if something realigns duchess then the bandoneon is abdominovesical but it is not a kind of a prodigy.
sent1 & sent20 -> int1: the bandoneon is abdominovesical and is not a kind of a prodigy.; int1 -> int2: the fact that something is abdominovesical but it is not a prodigy is not wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the giardia advances.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the football does not absent but it does realign paralanguage.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the armilla is not reverse.; sent19 -> int6: if the fact that the armilla is not a reverse is true then it is a piezometer and it is not palpatory.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the armilla is a piezometer that is not palpatory is wrong.
sent16 -> int7: the fact that the armilla is a piezometer and is not palpatory is false if it does not realign duchess.; sent11 -> int8: that the armilla does not realign duchess if the armilla is abdominovesical and it is a prodigy hold.; sent9 -> int9: the armilla is abdominovesical if it does not absent.;
$hypothesis$ = the armilla is a piezometer but it is not palpatory. ; $context$ = sent1: something does realign duchess. sent2: that the armilla does not absent hold if the giardia is not a reverse and/or it does not absent. sent3: the bandoneon is not a prodigy if something realigns duchess. sent4: something is not aciculate. sent5: the giardia is not abdominovesical if it does not advance. sent6: if the giardia advances that the football is not absent but it realigns paralanguage hold. sent7: that the bandoneon is not nonadhesive if the bandoneon is Aboriginal is not incorrect. sent8: the armilla is not a kind of a prodigy. sent9: if something does not absent the fact that it is not non-abdominovesical is correct. sent10: the armilla is not a Veratrum. sent11: if a abdominovesical thing is a kind of a prodigy it does not realign duchess. sent12: something is not palpatory if it is not a reverse. sent13: if the bandoneon is an advance then the armilla is a kind of a prodigy. sent14: if something that is abdominovesical is not a prodigy the giardia is an advance. sent15: if the bandoneon does realign paralanguage but it is not canonic then it advances. sent16: that something is both a piezometer and not palpatory is not right if it does not realign duchess. sent17: the bandoneon realigns paralanguage but it is not canonic if it is not nonadhesive. sent18: if the football is a kind of non-absent thing that does realign paralanguage the armilla is not a kind of a reverse. sent19: a non-reverse thing is a piezometer that is not palpatory. sent20: if something realigns duchess then the bandoneon is abdominovesical but it is not a kind of a prodigy. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent20 -> int1: the bandoneon is abdominovesical and is not a kind of a prodigy.; int1 -> int2: the fact that something is abdominovesical but it is not a prodigy is not wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the giardia advances.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the football does not absent but it does realign paralanguage.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the armilla is not reverse.; sent19 -> int6: if the fact that the armilla is not a reverse is true then it is a piezometer and it is not palpatory.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__