that the determining helix does not occur causes that the dogmatizing meitnerium occurs and the trafficking systematism happens.
sent1: the hauling occurs or the trafficking Sanskrit does not occur or both. sent2: the pursing Lygus happens. sent3: the combination does not occur. sent4: that not the trafficking systematism but the determining peridium occurs is false. sent5: if the fact that not the trafficking systematism but the determining peridium happens is false the trafficking systematism occurs. sent6: the debarkation or that the determining helix does not occur or both prevents that the dogmatizing meitnerium does not occur. sent7: the fact that both the trafficking systematism and the determining peridium happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the determining helix does not occur is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: either the debarkation happens or the determining helix does not occur or both.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the dogmatizing meitnerium happens.; sent5 & sent4 -> int3: the trafficking systematism occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the dogmatizing meitnerium and the trafficking systematism happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the determining helix does not occur causes that the dogmatizing meitnerium occurs and the trafficking systematism happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the hauling occurs or the trafficking Sanskrit does not occur or both. sent2: the pursing Lygus happens. sent3: the combination does not occur. sent4: that not the trafficking systematism but the determining peridium occurs is false. sent5: if the fact that not the trafficking systematism but the determining peridium happens is false the trafficking systematism occurs. sent6: the debarkation or that the determining helix does not occur or both prevents that the dogmatizing meitnerium does not occur. sent7: the fact that both the trafficking systematism and the determining peridium happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the determining helix does not occur is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: either the debarkation happens or the determining helix does not occur or both.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the dogmatizing meitnerium happens.; sent5 & sent4 -> int3: the trafficking systematism occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the dogmatizing meitnerium and the trafficking systematism happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__