the fact that the evening sucker does not occur if the anemometricness happens is false.
sent1: the outshouting won happens. sent2: the frontalness does not occur if the housecleaning ambulation occurs. sent3: if the Marianness occurs then that the Concord does not occur but the towing happens is not right. sent4: the dangerousness occurs if the sociologicalness happens. sent5: the fact that the towing happens is true. sent6: if that the defense does not occur and the lubrication does not occur is false then the acetonicness does not occur. sent7: the ungualness and the anemometricness happens if the armorialness does not occur. sent8: that the acetonicness does not occur triggers that the incorrectness does not occur but the dynamics occurs. sent9: the correctness results in that the Malthusianness does not occur and the updraft does not occur. sent10: the emblazoning occurs. sent11: the fact that the discarding occurs but the evening sucker does not occur is not correct if the mikvah does not occur. sent12: if the accident happens the bearing insurrectionism does not occur. sent13: the evening sucker does not occur if both the anemometricness and the armorialness occurs. sent14: if the decathlon does not occur the fact that the defense does not occur and the lubrication does not occur is wrong. sent15: if that not the Concord but the towing happens does not hold then the fact that the mikvah does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: if the updraft does not occur the emblazoning does not occur and the Marianness occurs. sent17: the armorialness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the anemometricness happens hold.; assump1 & sent17 -> int1: the anemometricness happens and the armorialness occurs.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the evening sucker does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the ungualness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the evening sucker does not occur if the anemometricness happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the outshouting won happens. sent2: the frontalness does not occur if the housecleaning ambulation occurs. sent3: if the Marianness occurs then that the Concord does not occur but the towing happens is not right. sent4: the dangerousness occurs if the sociologicalness happens. sent5: the fact that the towing happens is true. sent6: if that the defense does not occur and the lubrication does not occur is false then the acetonicness does not occur. sent7: the ungualness and the anemometricness happens if the armorialness does not occur. sent8: that the acetonicness does not occur triggers that the incorrectness does not occur but the dynamics occurs. sent9: the correctness results in that the Malthusianness does not occur and the updraft does not occur. sent10: the emblazoning occurs. sent11: the fact that the discarding occurs but the evening sucker does not occur is not correct if the mikvah does not occur. sent12: if the accident happens the bearing insurrectionism does not occur. sent13: the evening sucker does not occur if both the anemometricness and the armorialness occurs. sent14: if the decathlon does not occur the fact that the defense does not occur and the lubrication does not occur is wrong. sent15: if that not the Concord but the towing happens does not hold then the fact that the mikvah does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: if the updraft does not occur the emblazoning does not occur and the Marianness occurs. sent17: the armorialness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the anemometricness happens hold.; assump1 & sent17 -> int1: the anemometricness happens and the armorialness occurs.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the evening sucker does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__