the egomaniac does not frolic countess.
sent1: if something does officialize insincerity it is low-level. sent2: the egomaniac is not a Nudibranchia if there exists something such that it is not a Nudibranchia. sent3: something does officialize insincerity and officializes Proudhon if it is not a salon. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a salon and it is not a kind of a Nudibranchia is false. sent5: if something is low-level and it is blastodermatic it is not allelic. sent6: the Realtor is not a kind of a Eisenstein. sent7: the egomaniac is a kind of a conduit. sent8: that the egomaniac is blastodermatic is not incorrect if the fact that it is not a like or it is a Eisenstein or both is not right. sent9: the fact that the egomaniac does officialize insincerity is not wrong if it is not exocrine. sent10: the briar does not officialize insincerity. sent11: there is something such that that it is low-level and it is a kind of a Eisenstein is incorrect. sent12: there is something such that that it is a Eisenstein and it is not a salon is not correct. sent13: the beggar is low-level. sent14: the fact that either the demulcent is not a kind of a half-century or it officializes Proudhon or both does not hold. sent15: the egomaniac is a message if it is not a kind of a salon. sent16: that the egomaniac is not a like and/or it is a Eisenstein does not hold. sent17: something frolics countess if it is not allelic. sent18: the egomaniac is not a salon if there is something such that that it is a salon and it is not a Nudibranchia is not right. sent19: the egomaniac is not a bobsledding. sent20: the grits is a tiled if it officializes insincerity. sent21: the stayer is a kind of a Eisenstein.
sent3 -> int1: if the egomaniac is not a salon it officializes insincerity and it does officialize Proudhon.; sent4 & sent18 -> int2: the egomaniac is not a salon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the egomaniac officializes insincerity and officializes Proudhon.; int3 -> int4: the egomaniac does officialize insincerity.; sent1 -> int5: if the egomaniac officializes insincerity then it is low-level.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the egomaniac is low-level.; sent8 & sent16 -> int7: the egomaniac is blastodermatic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the egomaniac is low-level and blastodermatic.; sent5 -> int9: the egomaniac is not allelic if it is a kind of low-level thing that is blastodermatic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the egomaniac is not allelic hold.; sent17 -> int11: if the egomaniac is not allelic then it does frolic countess.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the egomaniac does not frolic countess. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does officialize insincerity it is low-level. sent2: the egomaniac is not a Nudibranchia if there exists something such that it is not a Nudibranchia. sent3: something does officialize insincerity and officializes Proudhon if it is not a salon. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a salon and it is not a kind of a Nudibranchia is false. sent5: if something is low-level and it is blastodermatic it is not allelic. sent6: the Realtor is not a kind of a Eisenstein. sent7: the egomaniac is a kind of a conduit. sent8: that the egomaniac is blastodermatic is not incorrect if the fact that it is not a like or it is a Eisenstein or both is not right. sent9: the fact that the egomaniac does officialize insincerity is not wrong if it is not exocrine. sent10: the briar does not officialize insincerity. sent11: there is something such that that it is low-level and it is a kind of a Eisenstein is incorrect. sent12: there is something such that that it is a Eisenstein and it is not a salon is not correct. sent13: the beggar is low-level. sent14: the fact that either the demulcent is not a kind of a half-century or it officializes Proudhon or both does not hold. sent15: the egomaniac is a message if it is not a kind of a salon. sent16: that the egomaniac is not a like and/or it is a Eisenstein does not hold. sent17: something frolics countess if it is not allelic. sent18: the egomaniac is not a salon if there is something such that that it is a salon and it is not a Nudibranchia is not right. sent19: the egomaniac is not a bobsledding. sent20: the grits is a tiled if it officializes insincerity. sent21: the stayer is a kind of a Eisenstein. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the egomaniac is not a salon it officializes insincerity and it does officialize Proudhon.; sent4 & sent18 -> int2: the egomaniac is not a salon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the egomaniac officializes insincerity and officializes Proudhon.; int3 -> int4: the egomaniac does officialize insincerity.; sent1 -> int5: if the egomaniac officializes insincerity then it is low-level.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the egomaniac is low-level.; sent8 & sent16 -> int7: the egomaniac is blastodermatic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the egomaniac is low-level and blastodermatic.; sent5 -> int9: the egomaniac is not allelic if it is a kind of low-level thing that is blastodermatic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the egomaniac is not allelic hold.; sent17 -> int11: if the egomaniac is not allelic then it does frolic countess.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__