the obtainment does not occur.
sent1: that the obtainment does not occur hold if the exporting occurs and the becoming happens. sent2: if the guttering stagehand does not occur the exporting occurs. sent3: that the tasting Thessalian happens and/or that the guttering stagehand does not occur is brought about by that the pediatricsness occurs. sent4: if that the positioning occurs but the pothering does not occur is incorrect then the pothering happens. sent5: the specialism does not occur. sent6: the pipe does not occur. sent7: if the guttering stagehand does not occur that the tasting Thessalian occurs and the exporting happens is false. sent8: the hobby does not occur and the MPEG does not occur if the palatoglossalness occurs. sent9: the MPEG does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the MPEG and the palatoglossalness occurs is not right. sent11: that the position occurs but the pothering does not occur is wrong if that the pipe does not occur is true. sent12: if the obtainment happens the guttering stagehand does not occur or the becoming occurs or both. sent13: the skeleton happens. sent14: if the pothering occurs the becoming occurs. sent15: that the obtainment and the MPEG happens is brought about by the non-palatoglossalness. sent16: the pediatricsness happens if that both the MPEG and the non-palatoglossalness happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the MPEG and the non-palatoglossalness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the MPEG happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the MPEG and the non-palatoglossalness occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the pediatricsness occurs.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the tasting Thessalian happens or the guttering stagehand does not occur or both.; sent11 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the positioning but not the pothering occurs is not true.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the pothering happens.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the becoming occurs.;
the fact that the hobby does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = the obtainment does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the obtainment does not occur hold if the exporting occurs and the becoming happens. sent2: if the guttering stagehand does not occur the exporting occurs. sent3: that the tasting Thessalian happens and/or that the guttering stagehand does not occur is brought about by that the pediatricsness occurs. sent4: if that the positioning occurs but the pothering does not occur is incorrect then the pothering happens. sent5: the specialism does not occur. sent6: the pipe does not occur. sent7: if the guttering stagehand does not occur that the tasting Thessalian occurs and the exporting happens is false. sent8: the hobby does not occur and the MPEG does not occur if the palatoglossalness occurs. sent9: the MPEG does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the MPEG and the palatoglossalness occurs is not right. sent11: that the position occurs but the pothering does not occur is wrong if that the pipe does not occur is true. sent12: if the obtainment happens the guttering stagehand does not occur or the becoming occurs or both. sent13: the skeleton happens. sent14: if the pothering occurs the becoming occurs. sent15: that the obtainment and the MPEG happens is brought about by the non-palatoglossalness. sent16: the pediatricsness happens if that both the MPEG and the non-palatoglossalness happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the MPEG and the non-palatoglossalness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the MPEG happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the MPEG and the non-palatoglossalness occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the pediatricsness occurs.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the tasting Thessalian happens or the guttering stagehand does not occur or both.; sent11 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the positioning but not the pothering occurs is not true.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the pothering happens.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the becoming occurs.; __UNKNOWN__