the arc-boutant decrepitates.
sent1: if either something is not lung-like or it is not alliaceous or both then it is not alliaceous. sent2: the AI is a commercial if there is something such that it is open-source. sent3: the centenarian does not guggle earful if there is something such that that it is not a prate and is an ebb is incorrect. sent4: the calculus does decrepitate. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is psychotherapeutic and it is zygomatic is wrong the AI is not psychotherapeutic. sent6: something does not decrepitate if it is not a stride and it is commercial. sent7: there is something such that it is not a pockmark and not open-source. sent8: something is a commercial and it is infernal if it does not leap sealskin. sent9: if the AI does predestine midwifery the arc-boutant is not a kind of a stride. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a prate and it does ebb is false. sent11: something predestines midwifery and it is a kind of a hypostatization if that it is not psychotherapeutic is correct. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is psychotherapeutic and it is zygomatic is false. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a pockmark but not open-source is incorrect. sent14: the AI is commercial if that there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a pockmark and it is not open-source is not correct is not wrong. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a pockmark and not open-source is not correct. sent16: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a pockmark and it is open-source is wrong. sent17: the vulcanite is a Houyhnhnm. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is not a commercial and it does not decrepitate is not correct. sent19: the centenarian is not lung-like and/or is not alliaceous.
sent15 & sent14 -> int1: the AI is a commercial.;
the arc-boutant does not decrepitate.
sent6 -> int2: the arc-boutant does not decrepitate if it is not a stride and it is a commercial.; sent11 -> int3: the AI does predestine midwifery and it is a hypostatization if it is not psychotherapeutic.; sent12 & sent5 -> int4: the AI is not psychotherapeutic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the AI does predestine midwifery and it is a kind of a hypostatization.; int5 -> int6: the AI predestines midwifery.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: that the arc-boutant does not stride is right.; sent8 -> int8: if the arc-boutant does not leap sealskin then it is commercial thing that is infernal.; sent1 -> int9: the centenarian is not alliaceous if it is not lung-like and/or it is not alliaceous.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: the centenarian is not alliaceous.; sent10 & sent3 -> int11: the centenarian does not guggle earful.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the centenarian is not alliaceous and does not guggle earful.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is not alliaceous and does not guggle earful.;
$hypothesis$ = the arc-boutant decrepitates. ; $context$ = sent1: if either something is not lung-like or it is not alliaceous or both then it is not alliaceous. sent2: the AI is a commercial if there is something such that it is open-source. sent3: the centenarian does not guggle earful if there is something such that that it is not a prate and is an ebb is incorrect. sent4: the calculus does decrepitate. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is psychotherapeutic and it is zygomatic is wrong the AI is not psychotherapeutic. sent6: something does not decrepitate if it is not a stride and it is commercial. sent7: there is something such that it is not a pockmark and not open-source. sent8: something is a commercial and it is infernal if it does not leap sealskin. sent9: if the AI does predestine midwifery the arc-boutant is not a kind of a stride. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a prate and it does ebb is false. sent11: something predestines midwifery and it is a kind of a hypostatization if that it is not psychotherapeutic is correct. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is psychotherapeutic and it is zygomatic is false. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a pockmark but not open-source is incorrect. sent14: the AI is commercial if that there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a pockmark and it is not open-source is not correct is not wrong. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a pockmark and not open-source is not correct. sent16: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a pockmark and it is open-source is wrong. sent17: the vulcanite is a Houyhnhnm. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is not a commercial and it does not decrepitate is not correct. sent19: the centenarian is not lung-like and/or is not alliaceous. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent14 -> int1: the AI is a commercial.; __UNKNOWN__