the unselfishness does not occur if the spectralness does not occur.
sent1: the hemodynamicness does not occur if the wangling or the hemodynamicnessness or both happens. sent2: if the fact that both the non-spectralness and the integumentariness happens is not correct the spectralness happens. sent3: that the spectralness happens results in that the bow-wow does not occur and the ascertaining klystron does not occur. sent4: that the acrogenicness occurs leads to that the voluntary does not occur and the uplifting does not occur. sent5: if the inversion does not occur then the fact that the non-spectralness and the integumentariness occurs is not correct. sent6: that the loop does not occur and the totaling does not occur hold. sent7: if the appellativeness occurs then the fact that the birefringentness does not occur and the wangling does not occur does not hold. sent8: if that the birefringentness does not occur and the wangling does not occur is wrong the wangling happens. sent9: if the picketing occurs then the appellativeness occurs. sent10: that that the inversion does not occur is brought about by that the hemodynamicness does not occur and the reflectorizing reactionary does not occur is true.
that the bow-wow does not occur and the ascertaining klystron does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = the unselfishness does not occur if the spectralness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the hemodynamicness does not occur if the wangling or the hemodynamicnessness or both happens. sent2: if the fact that both the non-spectralness and the integumentariness happens is not correct the spectralness happens. sent3: that the spectralness happens results in that the bow-wow does not occur and the ascertaining klystron does not occur. sent4: that the acrogenicness occurs leads to that the voluntary does not occur and the uplifting does not occur. sent5: if the inversion does not occur then the fact that the non-spectralness and the integumentariness occurs is not correct. sent6: that the loop does not occur and the totaling does not occur hold. sent7: if the appellativeness occurs then the fact that the birefringentness does not occur and the wangling does not occur does not hold. sent8: if that the birefringentness does not occur and the wangling does not occur is wrong the wangling happens. sent9: if the picketing occurs then the appellativeness occurs. sent10: that that the inversion does not occur is brought about by that the hemodynamicness does not occur and the reflectorizing reactionary does not occur is true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__