that there exists something such that if it is multinucleate and does undercut Taichung it is not a baron is not right.
sent1: something is a baron if it is a kind of multinucleate thing that undercuts Taichung. sent2: if something that does grate womanliness is geomorphologic it is a kind of a metropolitan. sent3: if the shear is a kind of a generation and it is antiquarian then it is not a kind of a color. sent4: the narc is a cardiopathy if it is a lacertid and it is a baron. sent5: if the fact that something is multinucleate and undercuts Taichung is correct the fact that it is not a kind of a baron is true. sent6: if something that does acculturate is avitaminotic then it does not induce narc. sent7: there is something such that if it does grate womanliness and is postpositive it is a Munchener. sent8: if something that does disapprove hypoglossal is a tailfin then it is a echoencephalogram. sent9: if a monetary thing is a spongefly then it does not reference. sent10: if the narc is a Sauterne and does induce trembles then it is not multinucleate. sent11: if something is a birdnest and it is a rotl it is a kind of a cardiopathy. sent12: there is something such that if it is a echoencephalogram and it does induce craniometry it is tabular. sent13: if something is transeunt and it does grate Ishtar then that it is bismuthal hold. sent14: something does induce prestige if it is surfacing thing that grates DFLP. sent15: if something is a kind of a metropolitan and it is a kennel it is gestational. sent16: if something is corporeal thing that is a gracefulness it teethes. sent17: if something disapproves spectacle and it grates sprag then it is avitaminotic.
sent5 -> int1: the narc is not a kind of a baron if it is multinucleate and it undercuts Taichung.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is multinucleate and does undercut Taichung it is not a baron is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a baron if it is a kind of multinucleate thing that undercuts Taichung. sent2: if something that does grate womanliness is geomorphologic it is a kind of a metropolitan. sent3: if the shear is a kind of a generation and it is antiquarian then it is not a kind of a color. sent4: the narc is a cardiopathy if it is a lacertid and it is a baron. sent5: if the fact that something is multinucleate and undercuts Taichung is correct the fact that it is not a kind of a baron is true. sent6: if something that does acculturate is avitaminotic then it does not induce narc. sent7: there is something such that if it does grate womanliness and is postpositive it is a Munchener. sent8: if something that does disapprove hypoglossal is a tailfin then it is a echoencephalogram. sent9: if a monetary thing is a spongefly then it does not reference. sent10: if the narc is a Sauterne and does induce trembles then it is not multinucleate. sent11: if something is a birdnest and it is a rotl it is a kind of a cardiopathy. sent12: there is something such that if it is a echoencephalogram and it does induce craniometry it is tabular. sent13: if something is transeunt and it does grate Ishtar then that it is bismuthal hold. sent14: something does induce prestige if it is surfacing thing that grates DFLP. sent15: if something is a kind of a metropolitan and it is a kennel it is gestational. sent16: if something is corporeal thing that is a gracefulness it teethes. sent17: if something disapproves spectacle and it grates sprag then it is avitaminotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the narc is not a kind of a baron if it is multinucleate and it undercuts Taichung.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__