the SEAL says and it subtilizes BPH.
sent1: the fact that the hybrid is neurotic is not wrong. sent2: if something is neurotic then it is indecorous. sent3: if the fact that the grotto is hexadecimal but it is not inconsolable is wrong the SEAL is hexadecimal. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does not subtilize BPH and is not a kind of a filing is incorrect. sent5: if something that does not subtilize BPH is not mobile then it is equitable. sent6: if the SEAL is a criminalization it is not hexadecimal. sent7: if something is both not a filing and not a distance it is not hexadecimal. sent8: the grotto is not a deductible if the fact that that the charwoman is a kind of a spat or is not a deductible or both is not wrong is not true. sent9: that the fact that the SEAL subtilizes BPH and is not hexadecimal is true is not true if the grotto is not a say. sent10: something is a Sorensen and it is Mishnaic if that it is not unalert hold. sent11: the SEAL is not hexadecimal if it is a kind of a spat and/or is a kind of a criminalization. sent12: something is not unalert if it does not subtilize whist. sent13: the SEAL spits if it is not deductible and not a say. sent14: if something is not hexadecimal that it is not inconsolable and is not a criminalization is incorrect. sent15: that the SEAL is not a kind of a deductible is true. sent16: the SEAL does subtilize BPH if there is something such that the fact that that it does not subtilize BPH and it is not a filing hold is not correct. sent17: the grotto is a criminalization if the SEAL is hexadecimal. sent18: if the SEAL is not hexadecimal that the grotto is a criminalization that subtilizes BPH does not hold. sent19: the charwoman is not a distance. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it subtilizes BPH and is not a filing does not hold. sent21: if the grotto is not a deductible then that the SEAL is a say and it does subtilize BPH is not correct. sent22: the grigri is a criminalization if that the iodine is not inconsolable and is not a criminalization is not correct. sent23: the iodine does not subtilize whist and it is not a kind of a blackbody if there are indecorous things. sent24: a Sorensen does not file and does not distance.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the SEAL does not say hold.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the SEAL is not a deductible and is not a kind of a say.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the SEAL is a spat hold.; int2 -> int3: the SEAL is a spat and/or it is a kind of a criminalization.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the SEAL is not hexadecimal.; sent4 & sent16 -> int5: the SEAL subtilizes BPH.;
the fact that the SEAL says and subtilizes BPH is not correct.
sent14 -> int6: if the iodine is not hexadecimal that it is a kind of non-inconsolable thing that is not a criminalization is not correct.; sent7 -> int7: the iodine is not hexadecimal if it does not file and it does not distance.; sent24 -> int8: the iodine is both not a filing and not a distance if it is a Sorensen.; sent10 -> int9: the iodine is both a Sorensen and Mishnaic if it is not unalert.; sent12 -> int10: if the iodine does not subtilize whist then it is not unalert.; sent2 -> int11: if the hybrid is not unneurotic then it is indecorous.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the hybrid is indecorous.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is indecorous.; int13 & sent23 -> int14: the fact that the iodine does not subtilize whist and it is not a blackbody hold.; int14 -> int15: the iodine does not subtilize whist.; int10 & int15 -> int16: that the iodine is not unalert hold.; int9 & int16 -> int17: the iodine is both a Sorensen and Mishnaic.; int17 -> int18: the iodine is a Sorensen.; int8 & int18 -> int19: the iodine does not file and is not a kind of a distance.; int7 & int19 -> int20: the iodine is not hexadecimal.; int6 & int20 -> int21: that the iodine is consolable and it is not a criminalization is wrong.; sent22 & int21 -> int22: the grigri is a kind of a criminalization.; int22 -> int23: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a criminalization is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the SEAL says and it subtilizes BPH. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hybrid is neurotic is not wrong. sent2: if something is neurotic then it is indecorous. sent3: if the fact that the grotto is hexadecimal but it is not inconsolable is wrong the SEAL is hexadecimal. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does not subtilize BPH and is not a kind of a filing is incorrect. sent5: if something that does not subtilize BPH is not mobile then it is equitable. sent6: if the SEAL is a criminalization it is not hexadecimal. sent7: if something is both not a filing and not a distance it is not hexadecimal. sent8: the grotto is not a deductible if the fact that that the charwoman is a kind of a spat or is not a deductible or both is not wrong is not true. sent9: that the fact that the SEAL subtilizes BPH and is not hexadecimal is true is not true if the grotto is not a say. sent10: something is a Sorensen and it is Mishnaic if that it is not unalert hold. sent11: the SEAL is not hexadecimal if it is a kind of a spat and/or is a kind of a criminalization. sent12: something is not unalert if it does not subtilize whist. sent13: the SEAL spits if it is not deductible and not a say. sent14: if something is not hexadecimal that it is not inconsolable and is not a criminalization is incorrect. sent15: that the SEAL is not a kind of a deductible is true. sent16: the SEAL does subtilize BPH if there is something such that the fact that that it does not subtilize BPH and it is not a filing hold is not correct. sent17: the grotto is a criminalization if the SEAL is hexadecimal. sent18: if the SEAL is not hexadecimal that the grotto is a criminalization that subtilizes BPH does not hold. sent19: the charwoman is not a distance. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it subtilizes BPH and is not a filing does not hold. sent21: if the grotto is not a deductible then that the SEAL is a say and it does subtilize BPH is not correct. sent22: the grigri is a criminalization if that the iodine is not inconsolable and is not a criminalization is not correct. sent23: the iodine does not subtilize whist and it is not a kind of a blackbody if there are indecorous things. sent24: a Sorensen does not file and does not distance. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the SEAL does not say hold.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the SEAL is not a deductible and is not a kind of a say.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the SEAL is a spat hold.; int2 -> int3: the SEAL is a spat and/or it is a kind of a criminalization.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the SEAL is not hexadecimal.; sent4 & sent16 -> int5: the SEAL subtilizes BPH.; __UNKNOWN__