the fact that there exists something such that it is a Kakemono or is a kind of a means or both does not hold.
sent1: the bunny is a Kakemono. sent2: that something is not a kind of a buspirone and is not undeniable is not right if it is not uninucleate. sent3: the totalitarian is living if the bunny does living. sent4: the aecium is uninucleate and medicolegal if there is something such that it does feminize. sent5: if the bicorn does not dun petfood then that the second-rater does not dun bijou and it is not a kind of a honey does not hold. sent6: if something is a kind of a means then it is living. sent7: if the cyrilla is not chemiluminescent it is not bronchoscopic and does dun petfood. sent8: if the aecium is uninucleate and it is medicolegal then the choc is not uninucleate. sent9: if the fact that the specific is a kind of a pronoun is right then the bunny does mean. sent10: that something is both not a certification and a zidovudine is wrong if it is a buspirone. sent11: something is liberal and/or it is a kind of a filth. sent12: something is a pronoun if the fact that it is not a certification and it is a zidovudine is not right. sent13: that the mallee does feminize is not incorrect if that the second-rater does not dun bijou and it does not honey is wrong. sent14: the cyrilla is not chemiluminescent. sent15: the bicorn does not dun petfood if the cyrilla is not bronchoscopic but it does dun petfood. sent16: something duns drapery and/or it is a protectorship. sent17: either the bunny is a kind of a background or it is a means or both.
sent1 -> int1: the bunny is a Kakemono or a means or both.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the totalitarian is a Kakemono or it lives or both.
sent6 -> int2: if the bunny is a means then the fact that it does not live does not hold.; sent12 -> int3: if that the specific is not a kind of a certification but it is a zidovudine is wrong then it is a kind of a pronoun.; sent10 -> int4: if the specific is a buspirone then that it is not a certification and it is a zidovudine is not true.; sent2 -> int5: if the choc is not uninucleate that it is not a buspirone and it is not undeniable is wrong.; sent7 & sent14 -> int6: the cyrilla is a kind of non-bronchoscopic thing that does dun petfood.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the bicorn does not dun petfood.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: that the second-rater does not dun bijou and it is not a honey does not hold.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the mallee feminizes.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it feminizes is not false.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the aecium is uninucleate and it is medicolegal.; sent8 & int11 -> int12: the choc is not uninucleate.; int5 & int12 -> int13: that the choc is not a buspirone and is not undeniable is false.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is not a buspirone and not undeniable is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is a Kakemono or is a kind of a means or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the bunny is a Kakemono. sent2: that something is not a kind of a buspirone and is not undeniable is not right if it is not uninucleate. sent3: the totalitarian is living if the bunny does living. sent4: the aecium is uninucleate and medicolegal if there is something such that it does feminize. sent5: if the bicorn does not dun petfood then that the second-rater does not dun bijou and it is not a kind of a honey does not hold. sent6: if something is a kind of a means then it is living. sent7: if the cyrilla is not chemiluminescent it is not bronchoscopic and does dun petfood. sent8: if the aecium is uninucleate and it is medicolegal then the choc is not uninucleate. sent9: if the fact that the specific is a kind of a pronoun is right then the bunny does mean. sent10: that something is both not a certification and a zidovudine is wrong if it is a buspirone. sent11: something is liberal and/or it is a kind of a filth. sent12: something is a pronoun if the fact that it is not a certification and it is a zidovudine is not right. sent13: that the mallee does feminize is not incorrect if that the second-rater does not dun bijou and it does not honey is wrong. sent14: the cyrilla is not chemiluminescent. sent15: the bicorn does not dun petfood if the cyrilla is not bronchoscopic but it does dun petfood. sent16: something duns drapery and/or it is a protectorship. sent17: either the bunny is a kind of a background or it is a means or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the bunny is a Kakemono or a means or both.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__