that the plunging does not occur and/or the ecologicalness does not occur is wrong if the clinching occurs.
sent1: the looting Cantabrigian does not occur if the clinch and the populating Merrimac occurs. sent2: the riveting curvature and the populating Merrimac happens. sent3: if that the looting Cantabrigian does not occur hold the fact that that the plunging does not occur and/or the ecologicalness does not occur does not hold is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clinch happens.; sent2 -> int1: the populating Merrimac occurs.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: both the clinching and the populating Merrimac occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the looting Cantabrigian does not occur is not false.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: that the plunging does not occur or the ecologicalness does not occur or both is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the plunging does not occur and/or the ecologicalness does not occur is wrong if the clinching occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the looting Cantabrigian does not occur if the clinch and the populating Merrimac occurs. sent2: the riveting curvature and the populating Merrimac happens. sent3: if that the looting Cantabrigian does not occur hold the fact that that the plunging does not occur and/or the ecologicalness does not occur does not hold is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clinch happens.; sent2 -> int1: the populating Merrimac occurs.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: both the clinching and the populating Merrimac occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the looting Cantabrigian does not occur is not false.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: that the plunging does not occur or the ecologicalness does not occur or both is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__