the latecomer sweetens festival.
sent1: the oligosaccharide is frictional if it is a differential. sent2: if the oligosaccharide is frictional thing that is not smokeless then it is not a Mugwump. sent3: the oligosaccharide is frictional thing that is not smokeless if it is differential. sent4: that if something is not infrequent then that it does reinforce Coolidge and is apsidal is not true is correct. sent5: the fact that the oligosaccharide is not a moquette is not incorrect if there exists something such that the fact that it is apsidal and is infrequent is incorrect. sent6: the oligosaccharide is a kind of a differential if the fact that it does intrude schlock hold. sent7: The schlock does intrude oligosaccharide. sent8: if the oligosaccharide is not a moquette and not a Mugwump then the latecomer does not sweeten festival. sent9: the oligosaccharide does intrude schlock. sent10: the Guyanese is punic but it does not reinforce Coolidge. sent11: the fact that the otoscope is a kind of apsidal thing that is infrequent does not hold if there exists something such that it is punic.
sent10 -> int1: the Guyanese is punic.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is punic.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the otoscope is apsidal and it is infrequent is incorrect.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a kind of apsidal thing that is infrequent is not true.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the oligosaccharide is not a moquette is not wrong.; sent6 & sent9 -> int6: the oligosaccharide is a differential.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the oligosaccharide is frictional but it is not smokeless.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the oligosaccharide is not a Mugwump.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the oligosaccharide is not a moquette and it is not a Mugwump.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the latecomer does sweeten festival.
sent4 -> int10: if the otoscope is not infrequent the fact that it does reinforce Coolidge and it is apsidal does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the latecomer sweetens festival. ; $context$ = sent1: the oligosaccharide is frictional if it is a differential. sent2: if the oligosaccharide is frictional thing that is not smokeless then it is not a Mugwump. sent3: the oligosaccharide is frictional thing that is not smokeless if it is differential. sent4: that if something is not infrequent then that it does reinforce Coolidge and is apsidal is not true is correct. sent5: the fact that the oligosaccharide is not a moquette is not incorrect if there exists something such that the fact that it is apsidal and is infrequent is incorrect. sent6: the oligosaccharide is a kind of a differential if the fact that it does intrude schlock hold. sent7: The schlock does intrude oligosaccharide. sent8: if the oligosaccharide is not a moquette and not a Mugwump then the latecomer does not sweeten festival. sent9: the oligosaccharide does intrude schlock. sent10: the Guyanese is punic but it does not reinforce Coolidge. sent11: the fact that the otoscope is a kind of apsidal thing that is infrequent does not hold if there exists something such that it is punic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the Guyanese is punic.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is punic.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the otoscope is apsidal and it is infrequent is incorrect.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a kind of apsidal thing that is infrequent is not true.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the oligosaccharide is not a moquette is not wrong.; sent6 & sent9 -> int6: the oligosaccharide is a differential.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the oligosaccharide is frictional but it is not smokeless.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the oligosaccharide is not a Mugwump.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the oligosaccharide is not a moquette and it is not a Mugwump.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__