the fact that that the coaching insolation happens is prevented by that the lens occurs is not right.
sent1: if the Sardinianness happens the fact that the ligature does not occur and the coaching insolation does not occur does not hold. sent2: the ligature happens. sent3: the marmoreanness happens. sent4: that the fact that the overlap does not occur but the unstatesmanlikeness occurs hold is false if the resolution does not occur. sent5: the oral occurs. sent6: that the finale happens and the quarterfinal happens is incorrect if the pleasantness does not occur. sent7: if the lens does not occur the dominating and the finale occurs. sent8: both the non-subclavianness and the coaching hexameter occurs if that the ligature happens is true. sent9: that the transatlanticness does not occur is brought about by that the reading parchment happens. sent10: the fact that the fact that not the amygdalotomy but the blastosphericness occurs is not true hold. sent11: if the instruction occurs and the coaching transferability occurs the grievance does not occur. sent12: the coreferentialness is prevented by that the misdemeanor happens and the gyralness happens. sent13: the subclavianness does not occur. sent14: the embodiment occurs. sent15: the coaching insolation does not occur if the dominating happens and the lens happens. sent16: that both the non-subclavianness and the coaching hexameter occurs is false if the dominating does not occur. sent17: that the non-industrialness and the deistness happens is caused by the overlapping. sent18: the reading centerboard occurs. sent19: if the industrialness does not occur both the Sardinian and the reading Ashur happens. sent20: the fact that the Sisypheanness does not occur hold if the fibrilloseness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dominating does not occur.; sent16 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the subclavianness does not occur and the coaching hexameter happens is false.; sent8 & sent2 -> int2: both the non-subclavianness and the coaching hexameter happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the dominating happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lens occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the dominating happens and the lens occurs.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: that the coaching insolation does not occur hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the finale occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the coaching insolation happens is prevented by that the lens occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Sardinianness happens the fact that the ligature does not occur and the coaching insolation does not occur does not hold. sent2: the ligature happens. sent3: the marmoreanness happens. sent4: that the fact that the overlap does not occur but the unstatesmanlikeness occurs hold is false if the resolution does not occur. sent5: the oral occurs. sent6: that the finale happens and the quarterfinal happens is incorrect if the pleasantness does not occur. sent7: if the lens does not occur the dominating and the finale occurs. sent8: both the non-subclavianness and the coaching hexameter occurs if that the ligature happens is true. sent9: that the transatlanticness does not occur is brought about by that the reading parchment happens. sent10: the fact that the fact that not the amygdalotomy but the blastosphericness occurs is not true hold. sent11: if the instruction occurs and the coaching transferability occurs the grievance does not occur. sent12: the coreferentialness is prevented by that the misdemeanor happens and the gyralness happens. sent13: the subclavianness does not occur. sent14: the embodiment occurs. sent15: the coaching insolation does not occur if the dominating happens and the lens happens. sent16: that both the non-subclavianness and the coaching hexameter occurs is false if the dominating does not occur. sent17: that the non-industrialness and the deistness happens is caused by the overlapping. sent18: the reading centerboard occurs. sent19: if the industrialness does not occur both the Sardinian and the reading Ashur happens. sent20: the fact that the Sisypheanness does not occur hold if the fibrilloseness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dominating does not occur.; sent16 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the subclavianness does not occur and the coaching hexameter happens is false.; sent8 & sent2 -> int2: both the non-subclavianness and the coaching hexameter happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the dominating happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lens occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the dominating happens and the lens occurs.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: that the coaching insolation does not occur hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__