the uncoiling does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the patronizing crush does not occur hold. sent2: not the isolationistness but the unsoundness occurs. sent3: if the legislatorship and the rhinoscopy happens then the wavering does not occur. sent4: if the synergisticness does not occur then both the stylelessness and the motionalness happens. sent5: the fact that the warmness does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: that the incidentalness happens hold. sent7: the snuffing recrimination happens. sent8: the randomness yields that both the snuffing recrimination and the renewal occurs. sent9: if the nonrandomness occurs the fact that the renewal does not occur and the uncoiling does not occur is not correct. sent10: the fact that the nonrandomness happens is not wrong. sent11: the non-isolationistness prevents that the nonrandomness does not occur. sent12: the patronizing terazosin occurs. sent13: the splashdown happens. sent14: the unsoundness occurs. sent15: both the renewal and the nonrandomness occurs if the isolationistness does not occur. sent16: the renewal does not occur if the patronizing incompatibility occurs and the uncoiling occurs. sent17: that the snuffing recrimination happens and the heavy-dutiness occurs is triggered by that the patronizing incompatibility does not occur. sent18: both the snuffing recrimination and the patronizing incompatibility happens. sent19: the uncoiling happens if that the patronizing incompatibility but not the uncoiling occurs is not correct. sent20: that the acupressure and the palatopharyngoplasty happens prevents that the transculturalness occurs.
sent18 -> int1: the patronizing incompatibility happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uncoiling happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the patronizing incompatibility happens and the uncoiling happens.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the renewal does not occur.; sent2 -> int4: the isolationistness does not occur.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the renewal happens and the nonrandomness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the renewal occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the classificatoriness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the uncoiling does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the patronizing crush does not occur hold. sent2: not the isolationistness but the unsoundness occurs. sent3: if the legislatorship and the rhinoscopy happens then the wavering does not occur. sent4: if the synergisticness does not occur then both the stylelessness and the motionalness happens. sent5: the fact that the warmness does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: that the incidentalness happens hold. sent7: the snuffing recrimination happens. sent8: the randomness yields that both the snuffing recrimination and the renewal occurs. sent9: if the nonrandomness occurs the fact that the renewal does not occur and the uncoiling does not occur is not correct. sent10: the fact that the nonrandomness happens is not wrong. sent11: the non-isolationistness prevents that the nonrandomness does not occur. sent12: the patronizing terazosin occurs. sent13: the splashdown happens. sent14: the unsoundness occurs. sent15: both the renewal and the nonrandomness occurs if the isolationistness does not occur. sent16: the renewal does not occur if the patronizing incompatibility occurs and the uncoiling occurs. sent17: that the snuffing recrimination happens and the heavy-dutiness occurs is triggered by that the patronizing incompatibility does not occur. sent18: both the snuffing recrimination and the patronizing incompatibility happens. sent19: the uncoiling happens if that the patronizing incompatibility but not the uncoiling occurs is not correct. sent20: that the acupressure and the palatopharyngoplasty happens prevents that the transculturalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the patronizing incompatibility happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uncoiling happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the patronizing incompatibility happens and the uncoiling happens.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the renewal does not occur.; sent2 -> int4: the isolationistness does not occur.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the renewal happens and the nonrandomness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the renewal occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__