the blender either is not a Wessex or does not luminesce or both.
sent1: The spectrum does underquote footman. sent2: something that is a kind of a Chenopodium and underquotes spectrum is not a Wessex. sent3: the footman does not luminesce. sent4: the executrix is not a flickering and underquotes spectrum if there exists something such that it is Wittgensteinian. sent5: the footman is a Chenopodium. sent6: there is something such that that the fact that it approbates executrix and it is not Wittgensteinian is true is wrong. sent7: the boom is Wittgensteinian if there is something such that the fact that it does approbate executrix and is not Wittgensteinian is incorrect. sent8: something does not luminesce if that it is a Wessex and it is a kind of a Chenopodium is not false. sent9: if the footman is not a Wessex the blender is not a Wessex and/or does not luminesce. sent10: that the footman does not underquote boom and it is not a Chenopodium is false if the executrix does underquote spectrum.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the footman is not a Wessex hold if it is a kind of a Chenopodium and it does underquote spectrum.;
the fact that the blender is not a Wessex or does not luminesce or both is false.
sent6 & sent7 -> int2: the boom is Wittgensteinian.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is Wittgensteinian.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the executrix does not flicker and underquotes spectrum.; int4 -> int5: the executrix underquotes spectrum.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the footman does not underquote boom and is not a Chenopodium is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not underquote boom and is not a Chenopodium is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the blender either is not a Wessex or does not luminesce or both. ; $context$ = sent1: The spectrum does underquote footman. sent2: something that is a kind of a Chenopodium and underquotes spectrum is not a Wessex. sent3: the footman does not luminesce. sent4: the executrix is not a flickering and underquotes spectrum if there exists something such that it is Wittgensteinian. sent5: the footman is a Chenopodium. sent6: there is something such that that the fact that it approbates executrix and it is not Wittgensteinian is true is wrong. sent7: the boom is Wittgensteinian if there is something such that the fact that it does approbate executrix and is not Wittgensteinian is incorrect. sent8: something does not luminesce if that it is a Wessex and it is a kind of a Chenopodium is not false. sent9: if the footman is not a Wessex the blender is not a Wessex and/or does not luminesce. sent10: that the footman does not underquote boom and it is not a Chenopodium is false if the executrix does underquote spectrum. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the footman is not a Wessex hold if it is a kind of a Chenopodium and it does underquote spectrum.; __UNKNOWN__