the agnate does ammoniate Epicurus.
sent1: that the uke does not crook agnate but it is a cassava is incorrect if it is not admissible. sent2: if the uke is not admissible then the fact that it does not crook agnate and it is not a cassava is false. sent3: the agnate does ammoniate Epicurus if the fact that the uke does not crook agnate and it is not a cassava is not right. sent4: if the uke is not admissible the fact that it does crook agnate and is not a cassava does not hold. sent5: if that something is inadmissible thing that is not impressionistic is not true the fact that it does not ammoniate Epicurus is not incorrect. sent6: that the jar does not crook symbolatry and is not penumbral is not right. sent7: if the uke does not crook Gettysburg the fact that the agnate is non-admissible thing that is not impressionistic is incorrect. sent8: the fact that something is not impressionistic and it does not ammoniate Epicurus is not correct if it is admissible. sent9: the uke is not admissible. sent10: the Delaware does ammoniate Epicurus if that that the uke is not impressionistic and it does not ammoniate Epicurus is not correct is right.
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: that the uke does not crook agnate and it is not a kind of a cassava does not hold.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the agnate does not ammoniate Epicurus.
sent5 -> int2: if that the agnate is not admissible and it is not impressionistic does not hold then it does not ammoniate Epicurus.;
$hypothesis$ = the agnate does ammoniate Epicurus. ; $context$ = sent1: that the uke does not crook agnate but it is a cassava is incorrect if it is not admissible. sent2: if the uke is not admissible then the fact that it does not crook agnate and it is not a cassava is false. sent3: the agnate does ammoniate Epicurus if the fact that the uke does not crook agnate and it is not a cassava is not right. sent4: if the uke is not admissible the fact that it does crook agnate and is not a cassava does not hold. sent5: if that something is inadmissible thing that is not impressionistic is not true the fact that it does not ammoniate Epicurus is not incorrect. sent6: that the jar does not crook symbolatry and is not penumbral is not right. sent7: if the uke does not crook Gettysburg the fact that the agnate is non-admissible thing that is not impressionistic is incorrect. sent8: the fact that something is not impressionistic and it does not ammoniate Epicurus is not correct if it is admissible. sent9: the uke is not admissible. sent10: the Delaware does ammoniate Epicurus if that that the uke is not impressionistic and it does not ammoniate Epicurus is not correct is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: that the uke does not crook agnate and it is not a kind of a cassava does not hold.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__