that the crime does not occur and the episode does not occur does not hold.
sent1: if the treating telephotography occurs the adenoidalness occurs and the collusion does not occur. sent2: if the indecorum does not occur then the fact that the fact that the squawking eliminator or the dodge or both occurs is not right is correct. sent3: if the lashing does not occur the basidiomycetousness happens and the squinch happens. sent4: the non-adenoidalness is brought about by that both the autoplasticness and the crime happens. sent5: that the extinguishing does not occur causes that the wholesomeness occurs and the squawking polybutylene occurs. sent6: the collusion does not occur. sent7: the using does not occur if the nonjudgmentalness happens. sent8: the fact that the bloviating does not occur is not wrong. sent9: if the adenoidalness does not occur and the bloviating does not occur the collusion happens. sent10: the fact that the episode does not occur is not false. sent11: if the requesting does not occur the fact that the crime does not occur and the episode does not occur is not correct. sent12: the lashing does not occur if the fact that the squawking eliminator and/or the dodge occurs is incorrect. sent13: both the request and the autoplasticness occurs. sent14: both the taper and the fermentableness occurs. sent15: that not the nonjudgmentalness but the squawking blunder occurs is false if the basidiomycetousness happens. sent16: that either the non-autoplasticness or the bloviating or both happens is triggered by that the using does not occur. sent17: that the using does not occur brings about that the bloviating and the collusion happens. sent18: the nonjudgmentalness occurs if the fact that both the nonjudgmentalnessness and the squawking blunder occurs does not hold. sent19: the request does not occur if the autoplasticness does not occur but the adenoidalness occurs. sent20: that the squawking polybutylene happens yields the treating telephotography.
sent13 -> int1: the autoplasticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crime happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the autoplasticness happens and the crime happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the adenoidalness does not occur.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the adenoidalness does not occur and the bloviating does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the collusion occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the crime does not occur.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the crime does not occur and the episode does not occur is correct is not true.
$hypothesis$ = that the crime does not occur and the episode does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the treating telephotography occurs the adenoidalness occurs and the collusion does not occur. sent2: if the indecorum does not occur then the fact that the fact that the squawking eliminator or the dodge or both occurs is not right is correct. sent3: if the lashing does not occur the basidiomycetousness happens and the squinch happens. sent4: the non-adenoidalness is brought about by that both the autoplasticness and the crime happens. sent5: that the extinguishing does not occur causes that the wholesomeness occurs and the squawking polybutylene occurs. sent6: the collusion does not occur. sent7: the using does not occur if the nonjudgmentalness happens. sent8: the fact that the bloviating does not occur is not wrong. sent9: if the adenoidalness does not occur and the bloviating does not occur the collusion happens. sent10: the fact that the episode does not occur is not false. sent11: if the requesting does not occur the fact that the crime does not occur and the episode does not occur is not correct. sent12: the lashing does not occur if the fact that the squawking eliminator and/or the dodge occurs is incorrect. sent13: both the request and the autoplasticness occurs. sent14: both the taper and the fermentableness occurs. sent15: that not the nonjudgmentalness but the squawking blunder occurs is false if the basidiomycetousness happens. sent16: that either the non-autoplasticness or the bloviating or both happens is triggered by that the using does not occur. sent17: that the using does not occur brings about that the bloviating and the collusion happens. sent18: the nonjudgmentalness occurs if the fact that both the nonjudgmentalnessness and the squawking blunder occurs does not hold. sent19: the request does not occur if the autoplasticness does not occur but the adenoidalness occurs. sent20: that the squawking polybutylene happens yields the treating telephotography. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the autoplasticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crime happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the autoplasticness happens and the crime happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the adenoidalness does not occur.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the adenoidalness does not occur and the bloviating does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the collusion occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the crime does not occur.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__