there is something such that if it does circularize locator then the fact that it is a Blida and it is not a dendrobium does not hold.
sent1: the fact that that the tropopause is a Blida but it is not a kind of a dendrobium is true is false if it circularizes locator. sent2: if the spinel circularizes Silphium then it genuflects and does not circularize locator. sent3: that something is alvine but it is not electrochemical does not hold if that it is a fingerboard is right.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Sorbian is both not non-alvine and non-electrochemical is not correct if it is a fingerboard.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does circularize locator then the fact that it is a Blida and it is not a dendrobium does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the tropopause is a Blida but it is not a kind of a dendrobium is true is false if it circularizes locator. sent2: if the spinel circularizes Silphium then it genuflects and does not circularize locator. sent3: that something is alvine but it is not electrochemical does not hold if that it is a fingerboard is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__