there is something such that the fact that it does not rafter career and it is impetiginous does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the sodalist voices is correct that the isohel is not a voices but it is a pearlfish does not hold. sent2: if the beads rafters career then the fact that the rimu does not rafters career but it powwows demodulation is incorrect. sent3: the rosewood is a kind of a Geronimo. sent4: something does not squeegee Scheele and does voice. sent5: the isohel voices if that it does squeegee Scheele hold. sent6: the turnstone is a midnight. sent7: the rosewood is substantival if it is Orwellian. sent8: the rosewood is not a voice but it is a midnight. sent9: the rimu does not powwow demodulation if the fact that the turnstone does squeegee Scheele or it is impetiginous or both does not hold. sent10: if the isohel is a kind of a voice the rosewood is not substantival. sent11: if the beads is impetiginous that either the turnstone squeegees Scheele or it is not impetiginous or both does not hold. sent12: the rosewood is impetiginous. sent13: something does not rafter career but it is Orwellian. sent14: if the fact that the fact that the isohel is not a voice but a pearlfish does not hold is right then the rosewood is not substantival. sent15: the rosewood is Orwellian thing that is a midnight. sent16: if the fact that either the turnstone does squeegee Scheele or it is not impetiginous or both is not correct the rimu does not powwow demodulation. sent17: there is something such that that it is impetiginous and it powwows raised is not correct. sent18: that the turnstone is a kind of non-impetiginous thing that powwows raised is not right if the sodalist is impetiginous. sent19: the turnstone does not powwow demodulation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beads does not rafter career but it is impetiginous.; assump1 -> int1: the beads is impetiginous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the turnstone squeegees Scheele and/or it is not impetiginous is incorrect.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the rimu does not powwow demodulation.; sent15 -> int4: the rosewood is Orwellian.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the rosewood is substantival.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it does not rafter career and it is impetiginous does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the sodalist voices is correct that the isohel is not a voices but it is a pearlfish does not hold. sent2: if the beads rafters career then the fact that the rimu does not rafters career but it powwows demodulation is incorrect. sent3: the rosewood is a kind of a Geronimo. sent4: something does not squeegee Scheele and does voice. sent5: the isohel voices if that it does squeegee Scheele hold. sent6: the turnstone is a midnight. sent7: the rosewood is substantival if it is Orwellian. sent8: the rosewood is not a voice but it is a midnight. sent9: the rimu does not powwow demodulation if the fact that the turnstone does squeegee Scheele or it is impetiginous or both does not hold. sent10: if the isohel is a kind of a voice the rosewood is not substantival. sent11: if the beads is impetiginous that either the turnstone squeegees Scheele or it is not impetiginous or both does not hold. sent12: the rosewood is impetiginous. sent13: something does not rafter career but it is Orwellian. sent14: if the fact that the fact that the isohel is not a voice but a pearlfish does not hold is right then the rosewood is not substantival. sent15: the rosewood is Orwellian thing that is a midnight. sent16: if the fact that either the turnstone does squeegee Scheele or it is not impetiginous or both is not correct the rimu does not powwow demodulation. sent17: there is something such that that it is impetiginous and it powwows raised is not correct. sent18: that the turnstone is a kind of non-impetiginous thing that powwows raised is not right if the sodalist is impetiginous. sent19: the turnstone does not powwow demodulation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beads does not rafter career but it is impetiginous.; assump1 -> int1: the beads is impetiginous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the turnstone squeegees Scheele and/or it is not impetiginous is incorrect.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the rimu does not powwow demodulation.; sent15 -> int4: the rosewood is Orwellian.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the rosewood is substantival.; __UNKNOWN__