the psychotic does not deduce Montespan.
sent1: that the gaff does not skim surd and is not intramolecular is not correct if there exists something such that it is proud. sent2: if the fact that the oilfield does not deduce errand is not wrong the fact that the soursop is proud and it is a promoter is not wrong. sent3: if that something does not skim surd and it is not intramolecular does not hold then it skim surd. sent4: the Iowan is peaceful. sent5: that if that the brae is not iridic is true then the fact that the Iowan is a kind of non-bionics thing that does deduce Montespan is wrong is true. sent6: something deduces Montespan if it is Wilsonian. sent7: the Iowan is non-bionics thing that is not iridic. sent8: if the fact that the gaff does skim surd hold the fact that the power is Wilsonian or is not a Spender or both is false. sent9: if there is something such that that it is Wilsonian and/or it is not a Spender does not hold the brae is non-iridic. sent10: the fact that the dasymeter deduces errand or it does skim double-bogey or both is wrong if the gravida is not a kind of a bait. sent11: if the Iowan is not iridic then the fact that the psychotic is both iridic and Wilsonian is not wrong. sent12: the gravida is not a kind of a bait. sent13: the fact that the psychotic is not bionics is not wrong. sent14: the oilfield does not deduce errand if the fact that that either the dasymeter deduce errand or it does skim double-bogey or both is correct is not right.
sent7 -> int1: the Iowan is not iridic.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the psychotic is a kind of iridic thing that is Wilsonian.; int2 -> int3: the psychotic is Wilsonian.; sent6 -> int4: the psychotic does deduce Montespan if the fact that it is Wilsonian hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the psychotic does not deduce Montespan is not false.
sent3 -> int5: the gaff does skim surd if the fact that it does not skim surd and it is not intramolecular does not hold.; sent10 & sent12 -> int6: that the dasymeter does deduce errand and/or it does skim double-bogey is false.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the oilfield does not deduce errand.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the soursop is proud and it is a kind of a promoter.; int8 -> int9: the soursop is proud.; int9 -> int10: there are proud things.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the fact that the gaff does not skim surd and is not intramolecular is false.; int5 & int11 -> int12: the gaff does skim surd.; sent8 & int12 -> int13: that the power is Wilsonian and/or it is not a kind of a Spender is not correct.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that that it is Wilsonian and/or it is not a Spender is wrong.; int14 & sent9 -> int15: the brae is not iridic.; sent5 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the Iowan is not bionics but it does deduce Montespan is not right.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that that it is not bionics and it deduces Montespan is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the psychotic does not deduce Montespan. ; $context$ = sent1: that the gaff does not skim surd and is not intramolecular is not correct if there exists something such that it is proud. sent2: if the fact that the oilfield does not deduce errand is not wrong the fact that the soursop is proud and it is a promoter is not wrong. sent3: if that something does not skim surd and it is not intramolecular does not hold then it skim surd. sent4: the Iowan is peaceful. sent5: that if that the brae is not iridic is true then the fact that the Iowan is a kind of non-bionics thing that does deduce Montespan is wrong is true. sent6: something deduces Montespan if it is Wilsonian. sent7: the Iowan is non-bionics thing that is not iridic. sent8: if the fact that the gaff does skim surd hold the fact that the power is Wilsonian or is not a Spender or both is false. sent9: if there is something such that that it is Wilsonian and/or it is not a Spender does not hold the brae is non-iridic. sent10: the fact that the dasymeter deduces errand or it does skim double-bogey or both is wrong if the gravida is not a kind of a bait. sent11: if the Iowan is not iridic then the fact that the psychotic is both iridic and Wilsonian is not wrong. sent12: the gravida is not a kind of a bait. sent13: the fact that the psychotic is not bionics is not wrong. sent14: the oilfield does not deduce errand if the fact that that either the dasymeter deduce errand or it does skim double-bogey or both is correct is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the Iowan is not iridic.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the psychotic is a kind of iridic thing that is Wilsonian.; int2 -> int3: the psychotic is Wilsonian.; sent6 -> int4: the psychotic does deduce Montespan if the fact that it is Wilsonian hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__