that the planula does not outgeneral Gaudi is correct.
sent1: the fact that something does outgeneral Gaudi and is not numerical is not true if it is a Mesua. sent2: the outflow does not shore Plantago if there exists something such that it is not hairy. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is alkaloidal and shores Plantago does not hold the outflow is not numerical. sent4: if something is not numerical it is not a Reggane and is not a Mesua. sent5: the planula is numerical if the fact that it is a kind of non-antistrophic thing that is not a Reggane does not hold. sent6: the rear is not hairy and does not shore gaffer. sent7: if the planula is a Reggane then it is numerical. sent8: if the outflow is alkaloidal then that the Mycenaen is not numerical hold. sent9: the Mycenaen is not numerical. sent10: if something does not outgeneral Gaudi then that it is alkaloidal and it does shore Plantago is incorrect. sent11: the planula is not a Reggane. sent12: the Mycenaen is not a Reggane. sent13: if that the Mycenaen does outgeneral Gaudi but it is not numerical is wrong then the planula does outgeneral Gaudi. sent14: something is not alkaloidal if it is a Mesua or it is numerical or both. sent15: The gaffer does not shore outflow. sent16: that the planula is not antistrophic and is a Reggane is wrong. sent17: the Mycenaen does not shore Plantago if the planula is non-alkaloidal. sent18: if the fact that the outflow is not hairy is not incorrect then it is alkaloidal and it shores Plantago. sent19: the Mycenaen is hairy. sent20: the planula does not shore gaffer if it is non-numerical. sent21: the fact that the Mycenaen is hairy is not incorrect if the outflow does not shore gaffer. sent22: the outflow does not shore gaffer. sent23: something is not a Reggane if it is hairy and/or it outgenerals Gaudi. sent24: the Mycenaen shores Plantago and it is hairy if that the outflow does not shore gaffer is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the planula is non-antistrophic thing that is not a Reggane does not hold.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the planula is numerical.; int1 -> int2: the planula is a kind of a Mesua or it is numerical or both.; sent14 -> int3: if the planula is a Mesua and/or it is numerical it is not alkaloidal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the planula is not alkaloidal.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the Mycenaen does not shore Plantago.; sent24 & sent22 -> int6: the Mycenaen shores Plantago and is hairy.; int6 -> int7: the Mycenaen shores Plantago.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the planula is not antistrophic and is not a Reggane.; int9 -> int10: the planula is not antistrophic.;
the planula does outgeneral Gaudi.
$hypothesis$ = that the planula does not outgeneral Gaudi is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does outgeneral Gaudi and is not numerical is not true if it is a Mesua. sent2: the outflow does not shore Plantago if there exists something such that it is not hairy. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is alkaloidal and shores Plantago does not hold the outflow is not numerical. sent4: if something is not numerical it is not a Reggane and is not a Mesua. sent5: the planula is numerical if the fact that it is a kind of non-antistrophic thing that is not a Reggane does not hold. sent6: the rear is not hairy and does not shore gaffer. sent7: if the planula is a Reggane then it is numerical. sent8: if the outflow is alkaloidal then that the Mycenaen is not numerical hold. sent9: the Mycenaen is not numerical. sent10: if something does not outgeneral Gaudi then that it is alkaloidal and it does shore Plantago is incorrect. sent11: the planula is not a Reggane. sent12: the Mycenaen is not a Reggane. sent13: if that the Mycenaen does outgeneral Gaudi but it is not numerical is wrong then the planula does outgeneral Gaudi. sent14: something is not alkaloidal if it is a Mesua or it is numerical or both. sent15: The gaffer does not shore outflow. sent16: that the planula is not antistrophic and is a Reggane is wrong. sent17: the Mycenaen does not shore Plantago if the planula is non-alkaloidal. sent18: if the fact that the outflow is not hairy is not incorrect then it is alkaloidal and it shores Plantago. sent19: the Mycenaen is hairy. sent20: the planula does not shore gaffer if it is non-numerical. sent21: the fact that the Mycenaen is hairy is not incorrect if the outflow does not shore gaffer. sent22: the outflow does not shore gaffer. sent23: something is not a Reggane if it is hairy and/or it outgenerals Gaudi. sent24: the Mycenaen shores Plantago and it is hairy if that the outflow does not shore gaffer is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the planula is non-antistrophic thing that is not a Reggane does not hold.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the planula is numerical.; int1 -> int2: the planula is a kind of a Mesua or it is numerical or both.; sent14 -> int3: if the planula is a Mesua and/or it is numerical it is not alkaloidal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the planula is not alkaloidal.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the Mycenaen does not shore Plantago.; sent24 & sent22 -> int6: the Mycenaen shores Plantago and is hairy.; int6 -> int7: the Mycenaen shores Plantago.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the planula is not antistrophic and is not a Reggane.; int9 -> int10: the planula is not antistrophic.; __UNKNOWN__