the bassinet is not unsusceptible.
sent1: if the cutworm is both not a corbie-step and not a monoblast the bungalow is not a kind of a intractability. sent2: the bungalow is invertible. sent3: the bungalow is a Ehrlich and it is a serendipity if it is not a intractability. sent4: if the bungalow is not invertible that the slip does not stunt slip and it is not a Argentinian does not hold. sent5: if something stunts slip and it is invertible then it is not a synchroscope. sent6: everything is a Argentinian. sent7: the cutworm is not a kind of a corbie-step and it is not a kind of a monoblast. sent8: the bungalow does stunt slip if the slip does not bankrupt emery and is not scapulohumeral. sent9: something is not a kind of a Ehrlich. sent10: the slip is not a Argentinian if the fact that it does not bankrupt emery and is not scapulohumeral is not true. sent11: if the bungalow is both a serendipity and not a synchroscope the bassinet is unsusceptible.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the slip does not bankrupt emery and is not scapulohumeral does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the slip is not a Argentinian.; sent6 -> int2: the slip is a kind of a Argentinian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the slip does not bankrupt emery and it is not scapulohumeral.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the bungalow stunts slip.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the bungalow does stunt slip and is invertible.; sent5 -> int7: if the bungalow does stunt slip and is invertible it is not a synchroscope.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bungalow is not a kind of a synchroscope.; sent1 & sent7 -> int9: the bungalow is not a intractability.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the bungalow is a kind of a Ehrlich and is a serendipity.; int10 -> int11: the bungalow is a serendipity.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the bungalow is a serendipity but it is not a synchroscope.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the bassinet is not unsusceptible.
$hypothesis$ = the bassinet is not unsusceptible. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cutworm is both not a corbie-step and not a monoblast the bungalow is not a kind of a intractability. sent2: the bungalow is invertible. sent3: the bungalow is a Ehrlich and it is a serendipity if it is not a intractability. sent4: if the bungalow is not invertible that the slip does not stunt slip and it is not a Argentinian does not hold. sent5: if something stunts slip and it is invertible then it is not a synchroscope. sent6: everything is a Argentinian. sent7: the cutworm is not a kind of a corbie-step and it is not a kind of a monoblast. sent8: the bungalow does stunt slip if the slip does not bankrupt emery and is not scapulohumeral. sent9: something is not a kind of a Ehrlich. sent10: the slip is not a Argentinian if the fact that it does not bankrupt emery and is not scapulohumeral is not true. sent11: if the bungalow is both a serendipity and not a synchroscope the bassinet is unsusceptible. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the slip does not bankrupt emery and is not scapulohumeral does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the slip is not a Argentinian.; sent6 -> int2: the slip is a kind of a Argentinian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the slip does not bankrupt emery and it is not scapulohumeral.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the bungalow stunts slip.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the bungalow does stunt slip and is invertible.; sent5 -> int7: if the bungalow does stunt slip and is invertible it is not a synchroscope.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bungalow is not a kind of a synchroscope.; sent1 & sent7 -> int9: the bungalow is not a intractability.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the bungalow is a kind of a Ehrlich and is a serendipity.; int10 -> int11: the bungalow is a serendipity.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the bungalow is a serendipity but it is not a synchroscope.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__