the fact that the sufficientness or the non-areolarness or both happens is not correct.
sent1: that the decortication does not occur is not wrong if the iconicness but not the lesson occurs. sent2: the paramagnetism occurs. sent3: the decortication happens. sent4: the areolarness does not occur if that the unpublishableness occurs and the regurgitation happens does not hold. sent5: if the fact that the sop does not occur is not false then that the unpublishableness occurs and the regurgitation occurs is incorrect. sent6: the iconicness is caused by the lesson. sent7: the sopping does not occur and the strangeness happens if the dissociating sailboat does not occur. sent8: the foreclosing does not occur if the fact that the moving vasovasostomy happens and the conversion occurs does not hold. sent9: the lesson happens if the decortication happens. sent10: that the gyneolatry occurs is brought about by the yelling argasid. sent11: if the dissociating sailboat does not occur the strangeness occurs. sent12: if the decortication does not occur the fact that the sufficientness and/or the non-areolarness happens is not correct. sent13: the iconicness prevents that the dissociating sailboat happens.
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the lesson happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the iconicness happens.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: the dissociating sailboat does not occur.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: not the sop but the strangeness happens.; int4 -> int5: the sop does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the fact that both the unpublishableness and the regurgitation happens is wrong.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the areolarness does not occur.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sufficientness and/or the non-areolarness happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sufficientness or the non-areolarness or both happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the decortication does not occur is not wrong if the iconicness but not the lesson occurs. sent2: the paramagnetism occurs. sent3: the decortication happens. sent4: the areolarness does not occur if that the unpublishableness occurs and the regurgitation happens does not hold. sent5: if the fact that the sop does not occur is not false then that the unpublishableness occurs and the regurgitation occurs is incorrect. sent6: the iconicness is caused by the lesson. sent7: the sopping does not occur and the strangeness happens if the dissociating sailboat does not occur. sent8: the foreclosing does not occur if the fact that the moving vasovasostomy happens and the conversion occurs does not hold. sent9: the lesson happens if the decortication happens. sent10: that the gyneolatry occurs is brought about by the yelling argasid. sent11: if the dissociating sailboat does not occur the strangeness occurs. sent12: if the decortication does not occur the fact that the sufficientness and/or the non-areolarness happens is not correct. sent13: the iconicness prevents that the dissociating sailboat happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the lesson happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the iconicness happens.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: the dissociating sailboat does not occur.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: not the sop but the strangeness happens.; int4 -> int5: the sop does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the fact that both the unpublishableness and the regurgitation happens is wrong.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the areolarness does not occur.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__