the futuristicness does not occur.
sent1: if the amplifying AHPCRC occurs then the urinariness does not occur. sent2: if the surfacing calanthe does not occur the fact that the feint occurs and/or the spoiling regicide happens is not correct. sent3: that the proselytism occurs but the surfacing calanthe does not occur is incorrect if the feinting does not occur. sent4: that the spoiling regicide happens prevents that the futuristicness occurs. sent5: if the futuristicness happens that the spoiling regicide occurs but the monatomicness does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the proselytism does not occur then the questioning occurs and the futuristicness happens. sent7: the proselytism does not occur if the fact that the feint occurs and/or the spoiling regicide occurs is not correct. sent8: the questioning occurs. sent9: the abdication and the questioning occurs if the proselytism does not occur. sent10: the monatomicness happens if the fact that the spoiling regicide but not the monatomicness occurs is incorrect. sent11: both the questioning and the proselytism occurs.
sent11 -> int1: the proselytism occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the proselytism or the spoiling regicide or both happens.;
both the monatomicness and the abdication occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the futuristicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the amplifying AHPCRC occurs then the urinariness does not occur. sent2: if the surfacing calanthe does not occur the fact that the feint occurs and/or the spoiling regicide happens is not correct. sent3: that the proselytism occurs but the surfacing calanthe does not occur is incorrect if the feinting does not occur. sent4: that the spoiling regicide happens prevents that the futuristicness occurs. sent5: if the futuristicness happens that the spoiling regicide occurs but the monatomicness does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the proselytism does not occur then the questioning occurs and the futuristicness happens. sent7: the proselytism does not occur if the fact that the feint occurs and/or the spoiling regicide occurs is not correct. sent8: the questioning occurs. sent9: the abdication and the questioning occurs if the proselytism does not occur. sent10: the monatomicness happens if the fact that the spoiling regicide but not the monatomicness occurs is incorrect. sent11: both the questioning and the proselytism occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the proselytism occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the proselytism or the spoiling regicide or both happens.; __UNKNOWN__