that both the riveting and the hanging occurs is false.
sent1: the fact that the disturbance does not occur and the revenging hostage does not occur does not hold. sent2: the TKO does not occur if the convergence and the auricularness occurs. sent3: the fact that if the fact that the settling arched happens but the deification does not occur is incorrect then the revenging opacification does not occur hold. sent4: the fact that the settling epergne does not occur but the woodwork occurs is wrong. sent5: the revenging harbor does not occur and the curettage does not occur. sent6: the fact that not the revenging bpm but the vulvectomy occurs is not true. sent7: the deification and the purpling occurs. sent8: that the inclusion does not occur and the biologisticness does not occur is not correct if the shutness occurs. sent9: if both the settling arched and the deification occurs then the phoneticness does not occur. sent10: the initiating thermosphere happens. sent11: both the rivet and the nonphotosyntheticness happens. sent12: if the restriction happens the fact that the improvement does not occur and the machine-madeness happens is not true. sent13: the dialecticness occurs. sent14: if the settling arched does not occur the inclusion does not occur and the biologisticness does not occur. sent15: if the phoneticness does not occur and the emblazoning canteen does not occur the hanging happens. sent16: the nonphotosyntheticness occurs. sent17: the storage occurs. sent18: that the sarcolemmalness does not occur and the absorbableness happens is not true if the initiating thermosphere happens. sent19: if the epiphenomenon occurs then the fact that not the zymoticness but the utilization happens is not right. sent20: the locker-roomness happens. sent21: the fact that the emblazoning canteen does not occur is correct. sent22: the shutness happens. sent23: that the emblazoning worrier occurs and the personifying does not occur is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the settling arched does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the inclusion does not occur and the biologisticness does not occur.; sent8 & sent22 -> int2: the fact that the inclusion does not occur and the biologisticness does not occur is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the settling arched occurs.; sent7 -> int5: the deification happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the settling arched happens and the deification happens.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the phoneticness does not occur.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the phoneticness does not occur and the emblazoning canteen does not occur.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the hanging happens.; sent11 -> int10: the riveting happens.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rivet occurs and the hanging occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the riveting and the hanging occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the disturbance does not occur and the revenging hostage does not occur does not hold. sent2: the TKO does not occur if the convergence and the auricularness occurs. sent3: the fact that if the fact that the settling arched happens but the deification does not occur is incorrect then the revenging opacification does not occur hold. sent4: the fact that the settling epergne does not occur but the woodwork occurs is wrong. sent5: the revenging harbor does not occur and the curettage does not occur. sent6: the fact that not the revenging bpm but the vulvectomy occurs is not true. sent7: the deification and the purpling occurs. sent8: that the inclusion does not occur and the biologisticness does not occur is not correct if the shutness occurs. sent9: if both the settling arched and the deification occurs then the phoneticness does not occur. sent10: the initiating thermosphere happens. sent11: both the rivet and the nonphotosyntheticness happens. sent12: if the restriction happens the fact that the improvement does not occur and the machine-madeness happens is not true. sent13: the dialecticness occurs. sent14: if the settling arched does not occur the inclusion does not occur and the biologisticness does not occur. sent15: if the phoneticness does not occur and the emblazoning canteen does not occur the hanging happens. sent16: the nonphotosyntheticness occurs. sent17: the storage occurs. sent18: that the sarcolemmalness does not occur and the absorbableness happens is not true if the initiating thermosphere happens. sent19: if the epiphenomenon occurs then the fact that not the zymoticness but the utilization happens is not right. sent20: the locker-roomness happens. sent21: the fact that the emblazoning canteen does not occur is correct. sent22: the shutness happens. sent23: that the emblazoning worrier occurs and the personifying does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the settling arched does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the inclusion does not occur and the biologisticness does not occur.; sent8 & sent22 -> int2: the fact that the inclusion does not occur and the biologisticness does not occur is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the settling arched occurs.; sent7 -> int5: the deification happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the settling arched happens and the deification happens.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the phoneticness does not occur.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the phoneticness does not occur and the emblazoning canteen does not occur.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the hanging happens.; sent11 -> int10: the riveting happens.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__