the non-Jewishness and/or the non-legalness occurs.
sent1: that the cloying lining does not occur leads to that both the approbating Semitic and the bioterrorism occurs. sent2: the fact that the underquoting earldom happens is true. sent3: if the cloying crazy does not occur that the non-Jewishness or the non-legalness or both occurs is not correct. sent4: that the reopening does not occur triggers that the reviving and the peasanthood occurs. sent5: both the cloying crazy and the corymboseness happens. sent6: if the corymboseness happens the vesper happens. sent7: the cloying lining occurs and the touching occurs if the interstitialness does not occur. sent8: the vegetativeness occurs. sent9: if the fact that the cloying lining and the non-interstitialness happens is not correct the cloying lining does not occur. sent10: the fact that the cloying lining but not the interstitialness happens is not true. sent11: if the resonance but not the rumination occurs the approbating moorage does not occur. sent12: if the cloying lining happens the fact that the bioterrorism does not occur and the approbating Semitic does not occur is false. sent13: if the drupaceousness does not occur the resonance occurs and the rumination does not occur. sent14: if the approbating moorage does not occur the disposableness but not the interstitialness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the receipting and the ageism occurs is false the fact that the drupaceousness does not occur hold. sent16: the cornering happens.
sent5 -> int1: the corymboseness occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the vesper occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jewishness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the vesper and the Jewishness happens.; sent9 & sent10 -> int4: the cloying lining does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: both the approbating Semitic and the bioterrorism occurs.; int5 -> int6: the bioterrorism occurs.;
the fact that the Jewishness does not occur and/or the legalness does not occur does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the non-Jewishness and/or the non-legalness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cloying lining does not occur leads to that both the approbating Semitic and the bioterrorism occurs. sent2: the fact that the underquoting earldom happens is true. sent3: if the cloying crazy does not occur that the non-Jewishness or the non-legalness or both occurs is not correct. sent4: that the reopening does not occur triggers that the reviving and the peasanthood occurs. sent5: both the cloying crazy and the corymboseness happens. sent6: if the corymboseness happens the vesper happens. sent7: the cloying lining occurs and the touching occurs if the interstitialness does not occur. sent8: the vegetativeness occurs. sent9: if the fact that the cloying lining and the non-interstitialness happens is not correct the cloying lining does not occur. sent10: the fact that the cloying lining but not the interstitialness happens is not true. sent11: if the resonance but not the rumination occurs the approbating moorage does not occur. sent12: if the cloying lining happens the fact that the bioterrorism does not occur and the approbating Semitic does not occur is false. sent13: if the drupaceousness does not occur the resonance occurs and the rumination does not occur. sent14: if the approbating moorage does not occur the disposableness but not the interstitialness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the receipting and the ageism occurs is false the fact that the drupaceousness does not occur hold. sent16: the cornering happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the corymboseness occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the vesper occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jewishness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the vesper and the Jewishness happens.; sent9 & sent10 -> int4: the cloying lining does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: both the approbating Semitic and the bioterrorism occurs.; int5 -> int6: the bioterrorism occurs.; __UNKNOWN__