the Po is not a kind of a lacteal but it does reward shegetz.
sent1: the fire is a kind of a mambo if there exists something such that the fact that it does not rummage decolletage and/or it is nonfictional is not true. sent2: that the fire is not a kind of a nitrobacterium and does not rummage decolletage is not correct if there is something such that it is a unwholesomeness. sent3: if something is a kind of a unwholesomeness then it rewards shegetz. sent4: if the sideroblast is a kind of a nitrobacterium then it does not rummage eccentric. sent5: that the Po does not reward shegetz but it does mambo is not correct. sent6: that the cryogen is a kind of a unwholesomeness is not false. sent7: something that is persuasive is nonfictional. sent8: there exists something such that that it rewards shegetz and/or it is not bloodless is not right. sent9: the decolletage does not reward shegetz if the fire is both nonfictional and bloodless. sent10: if the sideroblast is not iconic that it does not mambo or it does not rummage eccentric or both does not hold. sent11: if the sideroblast does triple then that it is not iconic is true. sent12: something is bloodless if the fact that it is not a kind of a nitrobacterium and does not rummage decolletage is false. sent13: if there is something such that it rummages decolletage then the fact that the cryogen is iconic and is not a unwholesomeness is not true. sent14: if there is something such that that either it does not rummage eccentric or it is not persuasive or both does not hold then that the fire does reward shegetz hold. sent15: something is a kind of a Witwatersrand. sent16: the Po is not persuasive. sent17: the fire is persuasive if there exists something such that that it does not mambo or does not rummage eccentric or both is wrong. sent18: the fact that either the Po does not rummage decolletage or it does not reward shegetz or both does not hold if it is not a lacteal. sent19: the sideroblast is a tripling. sent20: there is something such that it is not a nitrobacterium or it is not iconic or both. sent21: if the chipotle does rummage fire it is iconic. sent22: the fact that the decolletage does not rummage decolletage and/or does not reward shegetz is not true if it does not mambo. sent23: there is something such that it does rummage secularist. sent24: that the Po is not a kind of a lacteal but it does reward shegetz is incorrect if the decolletage does not reward shegetz. sent25: there is something such that the fact that it is catechetical or it is not a kind of a Varuna or both is false. sent26: if the fire is not a kind of a lacteal then the fact that it does not rummage eccentric or it is not nonfictional or both is not correct. sent27: the fact that the fire does not reward shegetz and is nonfictional is not true. sent28: that something is not an emissary and it is not an immersion is not correct if it is a tripling.
sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the sideroblast is not iconic.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that either the sideroblast does not mambo or it does not rummage eccentric or both is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is not a mambo and/or it does not rummage eccentric is not right.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fire is persuasive.; sent7 -> int5: the fire is nonfictional if the fact that it is persuasive is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fire is nonfictional.; sent12 -> int7: the fire is bloodless if that it is not a nitrobacterium and does not rummage decolletage is not true.; sent6 -> int8: something is a unwholesomeness.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: that the fact that the fire is not a nitrobacterium and does not rummage decolletage hold is incorrect.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fire is bloodless.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the fire is nonfictional and it is bloodless.; int11 & sent9 -> int12: the decolletage does not reward shegetz.; int12 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the rod is not a kind of an emissary and it is not an immersion is wrong is not incorrect.
sent28 -> int13: the fact that that the rod is not an emissary and it is not an immersion is not incorrect does not hold if the fact that it is a tripling is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the Po is not a kind of a lacteal but it does reward shegetz. ; $context$ = sent1: the fire is a kind of a mambo if there exists something such that the fact that it does not rummage decolletage and/or it is nonfictional is not true. sent2: that the fire is not a kind of a nitrobacterium and does not rummage decolletage is not correct if there is something such that it is a unwholesomeness. sent3: if something is a kind of a unwholesomeness then it rewards shegetz. sent4: if the sideroblast is a kind of a nitrobacterium then it does not rummage eccentric. sent5: that the Po does not reward shegetz but it does mambo is not correct. sent6: that the cryogen is a kind of a unwholesomeness is not false. sent7: something that is persuasive is nonfictional. sent8: there exists something such that that it rewards shegetz and/or it is not bloodless is not right. sent9: the decolletage does not reward shegetz if the fire is both nonfictional and bloodless. sent10: if the sideroblast is not iconic that it does not mambo or it does not rummage eccentric or both does not hold. sent11: if the sideroblast does triple then that it is not iconic is true. sent12: something is bloodless if the fact that it is not a kind of a nitrobacterium and does not rummage decolletage is false. sent13: if there is something such that it rummages decolletage then the fact that the cryogen is iconic and is not a unwholesomeness is not true. sent14: if there is something such that that either it does not rummage eccentric or it is not persuasive or both does not hold then that the fire does reward shegetz hold. sent15: something is a kind of a Witwatersrand. sent16: the Po is not persuasive. sent17: the fire is persuasive if there exists something such that that it does not mambo or does not rummage eccentric or both is wrong. sent18: the fact that either the Po does not rummage decolletage or it does not reward shegetz or both does not hold if it is not a lacteal. sent19: the sideroblast is a tripling. sent20: there is something such that it is not a nitrobacterium or it is not iconic or both. sent21: if the chipotle does rummage fire it is iconic. sent22: the fact that the decolletage does not rummage decolletage and/or does not reward shegetz is not true if it does not mambo. sent23: there is something such that it does rummage secularist. sent24: that the Po is not a kind of a lacteal but it does reward shegetz is incorrect if the decolletage does not reward shegetz. sent25: there is something such that the fact that it is catechetical or it is not a kind of a Varuna or both is false. sent26: if the fire is not a kind of a lacteal then the fact that it does not rummage eccentric or it is not nonfictional or both is not correct. sent27: the fact that the fire does not reward shegetz and is nonfictional is not true. sent28: that something is not an emissary and it is not an immersion is not correct if it is a tripling. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the sideroblast is not iconic.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that either the sideroblast does not mambo or it does not rummage eccentric or both is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is not a mambo and/or it does not rummage eccentric is not right.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fire is persuasive.; sent7 -> int5: the fire is nonfictional if the fact that it is persuasive is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fire is nonfictional.; sent12 -> int7: the fire is bloodless if that it is not a nitrobacterium and does not rummage decolletage is not true.; sent6 -> int8: something is a unwholesomeness.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: that the fact that the fire is not a nitrobacterium and does not rummage decolletage hold is incorrect.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fire is bloodless.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the fire is nonfictional and it is bloodless.; int11 & sent9 -> int12: the decolletage does not reward shegetz.; int12 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__