that there is something such that if it is not flaky it is not noncyclic and swears is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is flaky then it is not noncyclic and it swears. sent2: if something is not defervescent it flagellates pier. sent3: if something does not malt oculomotor it does grub paleolith. sent4: the scone is not a wobble but it is flaky if it is a wing. sent5: if something is not a angiologist it does not top outcaste and it is a kind of a Monophysite. sent6: if the partaker is not defervescent then it does swear and it malts laryngismus. sent7: there is something such that if it is not flaky then it swears. sent8: if something is not flaky it is a kind of non-noncyclic thing that swears. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not malt Betula then it is a kind of a anticholinergic and it malts oculomotor. sent10: that something does grub Ojibwa is not incorrect if it is non-amphoteric. sent11: if something is not flaky then it does swear. sent12: if the partaker is noncyclic then it does not top scone and is anthropometric. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not tribal it does malt Spain and is a hymn. sent14: the partaker is a kind of non-noncyclic thing that swears if that it is flaky is true. sent15: something is noncyclic and swears if it is not flaky. sent16: something is not ambulatory but it is bentonitic if it does not bound. sent17: something does not malt oculomotor and is a paperwork if it is not aeriferous. sent18: there is something such that if it is not flaky then it is noncyclic thing that does swear. sent19: something does not hog and is a madam if it is not a curbstone. sent20: the partaker swears if it is not flaky.
sent8 -> int1: the partaker is not noncyclic but it does swear if it is not flaky.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not flaky it is not noncyclic and swears is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is flaky then it is not noncyclic and it swears. sent2: if something is not defervescent it flagellates pier. sent3: if something does not malt oculomotor it does grub paleolith. sent4: the scone is not a wobble but it is flaky if it is a wing. sent5: if something is not a angiologist it does not top outcaste and it is a kind of a Monophysite. sent6: if the partaker is not defervescent then it does swear and it malts laryngismus. sent7: there is something such that if it is not flaky then it swears. sent8: if something is not flaky it is a kind of non-noncyclic thing that swears. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not malt Betula then it is a kind of a anticholinergic and it malts oculomotor. sent10: that something does grub Ojibwa is not incorrect if it is non-amphoteric. sent11: if something is not flaky then it does swear. sent12: if the partaker is noncyclic then it does not top scone and is anthropometric. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not tribal it does malt Spain and is a hymn. sent14: the partaker is a kind of non-noncyclic thing that swears if that it is flaky is true. sent15: something is noncyclic and swears if it is not flaky. sent16: something is not ambulatory but it is bentonitic if it does not bound. sent17: something does not malt oculomotor and is a paperwork if it is not aeriferous. sent18: there is something such that if it is not flaky then it is noncyclic thing that does swear. sent19: something does not hog and is a madam if it is not a curbstone. sent20: the partaker swears if it is not flaky. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the partaker is not noncyclic but it does swear if it is not flaky.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__