that if the escape is a nomination that the drop-leaf either is a kind of a riot or is not a Durham or both is false does not hold.
sent1: that something either is scholastic or does not middle lazuli or both is wrong if that it does not redirect escape is not incorrect. sent2: if something is a kind of a nomination then the drop-leaf does not traffic radicchio. sent3: the fact that the drop-leaf is a nomination and/or traffics radicchio is wrong if the escape is a Durham. sent4: the fact that the drop-leaf is a riot and/or it is a Durham does not hold. sent5: the fact that something either is a riot or is a Durham or both is false if it does not traffic radicchio. sent6: something is a riot or it is not a Durham or both if the fact that it does not traffic radicchio is not false. sent7: something is paleontological. sent8: either the drop-leaf riots or it is not a kind of a Durham or both. sent9: the drop-leaf is a kind of a riot and/or is not a Durham if the escape is a nomination. sent10: if the drop-leaf does not traffic radicchio the fact that it does riot and/or it is a kind of a Durham is false. sent11: if the escape is a nomination then the drop-leaf is not a riot. sent12: that the lazuli is a kind of a extemporization or is not a Durham or both is wrong. sent13: the fact that something riots or is not a kind of a Durham or both does not hold if it does not traffic radicchio. sent14: the drop-leaf is a riot or not a Durham or both if it does not traffic radicchio. sent15: if the escape is a nomination the fact that the drop-leaf is a riot and/or a Durham is not right. sent16: if something does not traffic radicchio then it does not riot. sent17: if the drop-leaf does not traffic radicchio then it does not riot. sent18: the fact that the drop-leaf is not a riot is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the escape is a nomination.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a nomination.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the drop-leaf does not traffic radicchio.; sent13 -> int3: the fact that either the drop-leaf is a riot or it is not a Durham or both is wrong if it does not traffic radicchio.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the drop-leaf either is a kind of a riot or is not a Durham or both is false.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the escape is a nomination that the drop-leaf either is a kind of a riot or is not a Durham or both is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something either is scholastic or does not middle lazuli or both is wrong if that it does not redirect escape is not incorrect. sent2: if something is a kind of a nomination then the drop-leaf does not traffic radicchio. sent3: the fact that the drop-leaf is a nomination and/or traffics radicchio is wrong if the escape is a Durham. sent4: the fact that the drop-leaf is a riot and/or it is a Durham does not hold. sent5: the fact that something either is a riot or is a Durham or both is false if it does not traffic radicchio. sent6: something is a riot or it is not a Durham or both if the fact that it does not traffic radicchio is not false. sent7: something is paleontological. sent8: either the drop-leaf riots or it is not a kind of a Durham or both. sent9: the drop-leaf is a kind of a riot and/or is not a Durham if the escape is a nomination. sent10: if the drop-leaf does not traffic radicchio the fact that it does riot and/or it is a kind of a Durham is false. sent11: if the escape is a nomination then the drop-leaf is not a riot. sent12: that the lazuli is a kind of a extemporization or is not a Durham or both is wrong. sent13: the fact that something riots or is not a kind of a Durham or both does not hold if it does not traffic radicchio. sent14: the drop-leaf is a riot or not a Durham or both if it does not traffic radicchio. sent15: if the escape is a nomination the fact that the drop-leaf is a riot and/or a Durham is not right. sent16: if something does not traffic radicchio then it does not riot. sent17: if the drop-leaf does not traffic radicchio then it does not riot. sent18: the fact that the drop-leaf is not a riot is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the escape is a nomination.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a nomination.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the drop-leaf does not traffic radicchio.; sent13 -> int3: the fact that either the drop-leaf is a riot or it is not a Durham or both is wrong if it does not traffic radicchio.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the drop-leaf either is a kind of a riot or is not a Durham or both is false.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__