the have is not tearless.
sent1: the coontie is a Celtic if that it hears invigilation and it does not hydroplane is incorrect. sent2: something is tearless if the fact that it does trip nones and it is not a kind of a chanterelle is incorrect. sent3: the fact that something trips nones and is not a chanterelle does not hold if it does elongate. sent4: the fact that something is ecclesiastical but it does not trip Chlamyphorus is not correct if it is a kind of a acoustician. sent5: something does foreclose if the fact that it is endomorphic thing that is not minty does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it is a luxuriance. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not trip consonant the have does elongate. sent8: there is something such that that it does not trip consonant is not incorrect.
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: that the have elongates is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: if the have elongates that it trips nones and it is not a chanterelle does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the have trips nones and is not a chanterelle is false.; sent2 -> int4: that the have is tearless is right if that it trips nones and it is not a chanterelle is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the have is not tearless. ; $context$ = sent1: the coontie is a Celtic if that it hears invigilation and it does not hydroplane is incorrect. sent2: something is tearless if the fact that it does trip nones and it is not a kind of a chanterelle is incorrect. sent3: the fact that something trips nones and is not a chanterelle does not hold if it does elongate. sent4: the fact that something is ecclesiastical but it does not trip Chlamyphorus is not correct if it is a kind of a acoustician. sent5: something does foreclose if the fact that it is endomorphic thing that is not minty does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it is a luxuriance. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not trip consonant the have does elongate. sent8: there is something such that that it does not trip consonant is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: that the have elongates is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: if the have elongates that it trips nones and it is not a chanterelle does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the have trips nones and is not a chanterelle is false.; sent2 -> int4: that the have is tearless is right if that it trips nones and it is not a chanterelle is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__