the fact that the panorama is both not Noachian and not a pane does not hold.
sent1: if something is a kind of a bowls the fact that the macrophage is not ultramicroscopic and it is not a Barbadian is not true. sent2: the officiant condoles macrophage if that it channels hold. sent3: something is not a pane if that that it is not ultramicroscopic and it is not a Barbadian is correct is not true. sent4: if the trend-setter does not condole macrophage and is not a throat then the panorama is a throat. sent5: if a diplomatic thing is not a kind of a throat it does condole private. sent6: if the macrophage is not a pane that the panorama is non-Noachian thing that is not a kind of a pane does not hold. sent7: the officiant is a channel. sent8: that the macrophage is not a Barbadian and it does not condole macrophage does not hold. sent9: the fact that the panorama is Noachian but it is not a pane is not correct. sent10: if something is not ultramicroscopic then that the fact that it is a bowls and is a kind of a broadloom hold is false. sent11: the opsin is a bowls if the private is a broadloom. sent12: something that is a kind of a throat is a kind of non-Noachian thing that is not a pane. sent13: if something does not condole macrophage it is diplomatic and is not a kind of a throat. sent14: the trend-setter is not ultramicroscopic. sent15: the private is a broadloom if the trend-setter is diplomatic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the trend-setter is not diplomatic is not incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: either the trend-setter is a throat or it is not diplomatic or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a throat and/or not diplomatic.; sent2 & sent7 -> int3: the officiant does condole macrophage.; sent3 -> int4: the macrophage is not a pane if the fact that it is not ultramicroscopic and it is not a kind of a Barbadian is false.;
the panorama is not Noachian and it is not a pane.
sent12 -> int5: if the panorama is a throat it is non-Noachian thing that is not a pane.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the panorama is both not Noachian and not a pane does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a bowls the fact that the macrophage is not ultramicroscopic and it is not a Barbadian is not true. sent2: the officiant condoles macrophage if that it channels hold. sent3: something is not a pane if that that it is not ultramicroscopic and it is not a Barbadian is correct is not true. sent4: if the trend-setter does not condole macrophage and is not a throat then the panorama is a throat. sent5: if a diplomatic thing is not a kind of a throat it does condole private. sent6: if the macrophage is not a pane that the panorama is non-Noachian thing that is not a kind of a pane does not hold. sent7: the officiant is a channel. sent8: that the macrophage is not a Barbadian and it does not condole macrophage does not hold. sent9: the fact that the panorama is Noachian but it is not a pane is not correct. sent10: if something is not ultramicroscopic then that the fact that it is a bowls and is a kind of a broadloom hold is false. sent11: the opsin is a bowls if the private is a broadloom. sent12: something that is a kind of a throat is a kind of non-Noachian thing that is not a pane. sent13: if something does not condole macrophage it is diplomatic and is not a kind of a throat. sent14: the trend-setter is not ultramicroscopic. sent15: the private is a broadloom if the trend-setter is diplomatic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the trend-setter is not diplomatic is not incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: either the trend-setter is a throat or it is not diplomatic or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a throat and/or not diplomatic.; sent2 & sent7 -> int3: the officiant does condole macrophage.; sent3 -> int4: the macrophage is not a pane if the fact that it is not ultramicroscopic and it is not a kind of a Barbadian is false.; __UNKNOWN__