the fact that the promulgator is both not a brandysnap and rectosigmoid does not hold.
sent1: if something does not complete that it is not a kind of a brandysnap and it is rectosigmoid is wrong. sent2: the promulgator falls if the envelope does not tinker. sent3: that that the carrageenin does not fracture menu but it is dormant hold does not hold. sent4: something that is not a kind of a tinker is not a Scolopax. sent5: the promulgator is not complete but it falls if the envelope does not tinker. sent6: if the envelope is a kind of a tinker then the carrageenin is not unlikely. sent7: if that the promulgator does not complete is true the fact that it is a kind of a brandysnap and it is rectosigmoid does not hold. sent8: if the fact that something does not fracture menu and it is not dormant is false then it is dormant. sent9: the promulgator is a fell. sent10: if the fact that something is not a brandysnap and it is not a tinker does not hold it does tinker. sent11: the carrageenin is not dormant if that it is not unlikely hold. sent12: that if something is not complete then that it is both a brandysnap and rectosigmoid does not hold is true. sent13: the fact that the promulgator is a brandysnap that is rectosigmoid is not correct. sent14: the fact that the carrageenin does not fracture menu and is not dormant is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the envelope is a tinker.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the carrageenin is not unlikely.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the carrageenin is not dormant.; sent8 -> int3: if the fact that the carrageenin does not fracture menu and is not dormant does not hold it is dormant.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the carrageenin is dormant is not incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the envelope does not tinker.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the promulgator does not complete but it is a kind of a fell.; int7 -> int8: the promulgator does not complete.; sent1 -> int9: that the promulgator is not a brandysnap but it is not non-rectosigmoid is incorrect if that it does not complete is not wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the carrageenin is not a Scolopax if it does not tinker.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the promulgator is both not a brandysnap and rectosigmoid does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not complete that it is not a kind of a brandysnap and it is rectosigmoid is wrong. sent2: the promulgator falls if the envelope does not tinker. sent3: that that the carrageenin does not fracture menu but it is dormant hold does not hold. sent4: something that is not a kind of a tinker is not a Scolopax. sent5: the promulgator is not complete but it falls if the envelope does not tinker. sent6: if the envelope is a kind of a tinker then the carrageenin is not unlikely. sent7: if that the promulgator does not complete is true the fact that it is a kind of a brandysnap and it is rectosigmoid does not hold. sent8: if the fact that something does not fracture menu and it is not dormant is false then it is dormant. sent9: the promulgator is a fell. sent10: if the fact that something is not a brandysnap and it is not a tinker does not hold it does tinker. sent11: the carrageenin is not dormant if that it is not unlikely hold. sent12: that if something is not complete then that it is both a brandysnap and rectosigmoid does not hold is true. sent13: the fact that the promulgator is a brandysnap that is rectosigmoid is not correct. sent14: the fact that the carrageenin does not fracture menu and is not dormant is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the envelope is a tinker.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the carrageenin is not unlikely.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the carrageenin is not dormant.; sent8 -> int3: if the fact that the carrageenin does not fracture menu and is not dormant does not hold it is dormant.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the carrageenin is dormant is not incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the envelope does not tinker.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the promulgator does not complete but it is a kind of a fell.; int7 -> int8: the promulgator does not complete.; sent1 -> int9: that the promulgator is not a brandysnap but it is not non-rectosigmoid is incorrect if that it does not complete is not wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__