the ethane does knock ham.
sent1: the Solomon's-seal is demonstrative if something that is not a kind of a Warren is a Peronosporaceae. sent2: the willowherb is not a Haber. sent3: the willowherb is not a corrugation. sent4: if a Warren is not a kind of a Peronosporaceae it does not knock ham. sent5: the ethane knocks ham if the Solomon's-seal is a demonstrative. sent6: if something is not a demonstrative then it is a Warren and is not a kind of a Peronosporaceae. sent7: that something is not a kind of a missionary and it is not a jessamine is not true if it is a Warren. sent8: if the willowherb is not a corrugation then it is not a missionary and it is not a Haber. sent9: the fact that the willowherb is not missionary and not a Haber does not hold if the odds-maker is a Warren. sent10: something does not knock ham if that it is a corrugation and knock ham is not correct. sent11: if the willowherb does not knock ham then it is not demonstrative. sent12: that the odds-maker is not a Peronosporaceae and not extroversive is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the odds-maker is a Warren.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the willowherb is non-missionary thing that is not a Haber does not hold.; sent8 & sent3 -> int2: the willowherb is not a missionary and it is not a Haber.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the odds-maker is not a kind of a Warren.;
that the willowherb is not missionary and it is not a kind of a jessamine does not hold.
sent7 -> int5: if the willowherb is a Warren the fact that that it is not a missionary and it is not a jessamine is right is not correct.; sent6 -> int6: the willowherb is a Warren and is not a Peronosporaceae if it is not a demonstrative.; sent10 -> int7: the willowherb does not knock ham if that it is a corrugation and it knock ham is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the ethane does knock ham. ; $context$ = sent1: the Solomon's-seal is demonstrative if something that is not a kind of a Warren is a Peronosporaceae. sent2: the willowherb is not a Haber. sent3: the willowherb is not a corrugation. sent4: if a Warren is not a kind of a Peronosporaceae it does not knock ham. sent5: the ethane knocks ham if the Solomon's-seal is a demonstrative. sent6: if something is not a demonstrative then it is a Warren and is not a kind of a Peronosporaceae. sent7: that something is not a kind of a missionary and it is not a jessamine is not true if it is a Warren. sent8: if the willowherb is not a corrugation then it is not a missionary and it is not a Haber. sent9: the fact that the willowherb is not missionary and not a Haber does not hold if the odds-maker is a Warren. sent10: something does not knock ham if that it is a corrugation and knock ham is not correct. sent11: if the willowherb does not knock ham then it is not demonstrative. sent12: that the odds-maker is not a Peronosporaceae and not extroversive is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the odds-maker is a Warren.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the willowherb is non-missionary thing that is not a Haber does not hold.; sent8 & sent3 -> int2: the willowherb is not a missionary and it is not a Haber.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the odds-maker is not a kind of a Warren.; __UNKNOWN__