the catoptricsness does not occur and the leakiness does not occur.
sent1: the lacteal does not occur if the fact that that the opening fistula does not occur and the definiteness does not occur is true is not true. sent2: if the lactealness does not occur or the pottery does not occur or both then the unbuttoning Darfur does not occur. sent3: if that the fact that the tusking badge occurs and the volution occurs is wrong is not incorrect then the Siniticness does not occur. sent4: the definiteness happens. sent5: if the opening fistula does not occur that the detaching happens and the swab occurs does not hold. sent6: the fact that the isotonicness happens and the faecalness happens is wrong. sent7: if the volution does not occur the Sinitic does not occur. sent8: the angriness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the non-catoptricsness and the non-leakyness happens does not hold if the fact that the Siniticness does not occur is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the tusking badge happens and the volution happens is not right if the fact that the unbuttoning Darfur does not occur is true. sent11: the RAIU does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the opening fistula does not occur and the definiteness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the definiteness does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the opening fistula does not occur and the definiteness does not occur is correct is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the lacteal does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the lacteal does not occur and/or the pottery does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the unbuttoning Darfur does not occur is true.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the tusking badge happens and the volution occurs is wrong.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the Sinitic does not occur.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the detaching and the swab occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the catoptricsness does not occur and the leakiness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the lacteal does not occur if the fact that that the opening fistula does not occur and the definiteness does not occur is true is not true. sent2: if the lactealness does not occur or the pottery does not occur or both then the unbuttoning Darfur does not occur. sent3: if that the fact that the tusking badge occurs and the volution occurs is wrong is not incorrect then the Siniticness does not occur. sent4: the definiteness happens. sent5: if the opening fistula does not occur that the detaching happens and the swab occurs does not hold. sent6: the fact that the isotonicness happens and the faecalness happens is wrong. sent7: if the volution does not occur the Sinitic does not occur. sent8: the angriness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the non-catoptricsness and the non-leakyness happens does not hold if the fact that the Siniticness does not occur is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the tusking badge happens and the volution happens is not right if the fact that the unbuttoning Darfur does not occur is true. sent11: the RAIU does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the opening fistula does not occur and the definiteness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the definiteness does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the opening fistula does not occur and the definiteness does not occur is correct is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the lacteal does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the lacteal does not occur and/or the pottery does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the unbuttoning Darfur does not occur is true.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the tusking badge happens and the volution occurs is wrong.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the Sinitic does not occur.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__