the exocrine is not a kind of a Parisienne.
sent1: if the rivulus is otic and it does parch shill the carob does not parch shill. sent2: if something that is undiplomatic is not a clamber the exocrine is not a Parisienne. sent3: the exocrine is not haemophilic. sent4: the carob is a kind of a clamber if that the exocrine is not a linin and not unworldly is wrong. sent5: the rivulus is not a kind of a firetrap. sent6: the fact that something does not parch shill and clambers is wrong if it is a kind of a Parisienne. sent7: if something is not undiplomatic that it is a linin and it is not unworldly does not hold. sent8: if something is a clamber it does parch shill. sent9: the carob does clamber if the exocrine is a kind of a linin. sent10: the fact that something is not a linin and it is not unworldly does not hold if that it is not undiplomatic is right. sent11: the fact that something is not haemophilic and does not clamber is not right if the fact that it is not a linin is correct. sent12: if that the rivulus is haemophilic hold it is otic thing that does not parch shill. sent13: the rivulus is haemophilic if the fact that it is not a firetrap is not wrong. sent14: that the rivulus is both not haemophilic and otic is false. sent15: if the rivulus is a kind of otic thing that does not parch shill the carob does not parch shill. sent16: the rivulus does not parch shill. sent17: something is a kind of a variable that is not a kind of a linin if it is not undiplomatic. sent18: if the exocrine is diplomatic then the fact that it is a linin and it is not unworldly is false. sent19: if the fact that the carob is otic thing that is not haemophilic does not hold it is not a kind of a Parisienne. sent20: if something is undiplomatic it is a Parisienne. sent21: the carob is otic. sent22: the rivulus does not parch shill if it is not non-haemophilic. sent23: that the exocrine is a linin but not unworldly is not true. sent24: the exocrine is a Parisienne if it is not otic.
sent10 -> int1: that the exocrine is not a linin and it is not unworldly is wrong if it is not undiplomatic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exocrine is not undiplomatic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the exocrine is not a linin and not unworldly is wrong.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the carob is a clamber.; sent8 -> int4: the carob parches shill if it is a kind of a clamber.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the carob parches shill.; sent13 & sent5 -> int6: the rivulus is haemophilic.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the rivulus is a kind of otic thing that does not parch shill.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the carob does not parch shill.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the exocrine is undiplomatic.; sent20 -> int11: if the exocrine is undiplomatic it is a Parisienne.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the telegraphy is a kind of a variable and is not a linin.
sent17 -> int12: the telegraphy is variable but not a linin if it is not undiplomatic.; sent6 -> int13: that if the carob is the Parisienne then the fact that the carob does not parch shill and does clamber is incorrect is not incorrect.; sent14 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-haemophilic thing that is otic is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the exocrine is not a kind of a Parisienne. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rivulus is otic and it does parch shill the carob does not parch shill. sent2: if something that is undiplomatic is not a clamber the exocrine is not a Parisienne. sent3: the exocrine is not haemophilic. sent4: the carob is a kind of a clamber if that the exocrine is not a linin and not unworldly is wrong. sent5: the rivulus is not a kind of a firetrap. sent6: the fact that something does not parch shill and clambers is wrong if it is a kind of a Parisienne. sent7: if something is not undiplomatic that it is a linin and it is not unworldly does not hold. sent8: if something is a clamber it does parch shill. sent9: the carob does clamber if the exocrine is a kind of a linin. sent10: the fact that something is not a linin and it is not unworldly does not hold if that it is not undiplomatic is right. sent11: the fact that something is not haemophilic and does not clamber is not right if the fact that it is not a linin is correct. sent12: if that the rivulus is haemophilic hold it is otic thing that does not parch shill. sent13: the rivulus is haemophilic if the fact that it is not a firetrap is not wrong. sent14: that the rivulus is both not haemophilic and otic is false. sent15: if the rivulus is a kind of otic thing that does not parch shill the carob does not parch shill. sent16: the rivulus does not parch shill. sent17: something is a kind of a variable that is not a kind of a linin if it is not undiplomatic. sent18: if the exocrine is diplomatic then the fact that it is a linin and it is not unworldly is false. sent19: if the fact that the carob is otic thing that is not haemophilic does not hold it is not a kind of a Parisienne. sent20: if something is undiplomatic it is a Parisienne. sent21: the carob is otic. sent22: the rivulus does not parch shill if it is not non-haemophilic. sent23: that the exocrine is a linin but not unworldly is not true. sent24: the exocrine is a Parisienne if it is not otic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: that the exocrine is not a linin and it is not unworldly is wrong if it is not undiplomatic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exocrine is not undiplomatic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the exocrine is not a linin and not unworldly is wrong.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the carob is a clamber.; sent8 -> int4: the carob parches shill if it is a kind of a clamber.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the carob parches shill.; sent13 & sent5 -> int6: the rivulus is haemophilic.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the rivulus is a kind of otic thing that does not parch shill.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the carob does not parch shill.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the exocrine is undiplomatic.; sent20 -> int11: if the exocrine is undiplomatic it is a Parisienne.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__