the fact that that the girdle does gorge Taliban if the liposome is unpatriotic is correct is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the liposome is both a rounded and radiopaque is incorrect. sent2: the totalitarian does land pinko. sent3: if something lands pinko and gorges Taliban it is unpatriotic. sent4: something that does gorge Taliban and does assemble resignation lands pinko. sent5: the girdle gorges Taliban but it does not assemble resignation if the liposome does not assemble resignation. sent6: the liposome does land pinko. sent7: The pinko does land liposome. sent8: something does not gorge Gallicism if it is non-radiopaque. sent9: if the liposome does not gorge Taliban the girdle is unpatriotic and does not gorge Taliban. sent10: something is patriotic thing that does not land pinko if it does not gorge Gallicism. sent11: something does not assemble chi if it is unpatriotic thing that is a kind of a Kilimanjaro. sent12: something is not unpatriotic if it does assemble resignation and it lands pinko. sent13: if something does not land pinko then the fact that it does not assemble resignation and does gorge Taliban is wrong. sent14: the city is non-radiopaque if there is something such that that it does round and it is non-radiopaque does not hold. sent15: something does not gorge Taliban if the fact that it does not assemble resignation and it gorge Taliban is not right. sent16: the girdle does assemble resignation and is unpatriotic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the liposome does assemble resignation.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the liposome assembles resignation and it does land pinko is right.; sent12 -> int2: if the liposome assembles resignation and lands pinko the fact that it is unpatriotic is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the liposome is not unpatriotic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the liposome is unpatriotic.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the liposome does not assemble resignation.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the girdle gorges Taliban but it does not assemble resignation.; int6 -> int7: the girdle does gorge Taliban.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the city does not gorge Taliban.
sent15 -> int8: the fact that if that the city does not assemble resignation but it does gorge Taliban is false the city does not gorge Taliban is not incorrect.; sent13 -> int9: the fact that the city does not assemble resignation and gorges Taliban is not true if it does not land pinko.; sent10 -> int10: if the city does not gorge Gallicism then it is not unpatriotic and it does not land pinko.; sent8 -> int11: the city does not gorge Gallicism if it is not radiopaque.; sent1 -> int12: there is something such that that it rounds and it is radiopaque does not hold.; int12 & sent14 -> int13: the city is not radiopaque.; int11 & int13 -> int14: that the city does not gorge Gallicism is not false.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the city is not unpatriotic and does not land pinko.; int15 -> int16: the city does not land pinko.; int9 & int16 -> int17: that the city does not assemble resignation but it gorges Taliban is not right.; int8 & int17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the girdle does gorge Taliban if the liposome is unpatriotic is correct is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the liposome is both a rounded and radiopaque is incorrect. sent2: the totalitarian does land pinko. sent3: if something lands pinko and gorges Taliban it is unpatriotic. sent4: something that does gorge Taliban and does assemble resignation lands pinko. sent5: the girdle gorges Taliban but it does not assemble resignation if the liposome does not assemble resignation. sent6: the liposome does land pinko. sent7: The pinko does land liposome. sent8: something does not gorge Gallicism if it is non-radiopaque. sent9: if the liposome does not gorge Taliban the girdle is unpatriotic and does not gorge Taliban. sent10: something is patriotic thing that does not land pinko if it does not gorge Gallicism. sent11: something does not assemble chi if it is unpatriotic thing that is a kind of a Kilimanjaro. sent12: something is not unpatriotic if it does assemble resignation and it lands pinko. sent13: if something does not land pinko then the fact that it does not assemble resignation and does gorge Taliban is wrong. sent14: the city is non-radiopaque if there is something such that that it does round and it is non-radiopaque does not hold. sent15: something does not gorge Taliban if the fact that it does not assemble resignation and it gorge Taliban is not right. sent16: the girdle does assemble resignation and is unpatriotic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the liposome does assemble resignation.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the liposome assembles resignation and it does land pinko is right.; sent12 -> int2: if the liposome assembles resignation and lands pinko the fact that it is unpatriotic is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the liposome is not unpatriotic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the liposome is unpatriotic.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the liposome does not assemble resignation.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the girdle gorges Taliban but it does not assemble resignation.; int6 -> int7: the girdle does gorge Taliban.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__