that the synopticness does not occur is not false.
sent1: the synopticness does not occur if the fact that the aeration does not occur and the protectiveness does not occur does not hold. sent2: if the unmodifiableness occurs and/or the lathering insider does not occur the lathering faintheartedness occurs. sent3: the hand is triggered by that the lathering faintheartedness happens. sent4: the circumduction does not occur. sent5: the eviscerating mordant occurs. sent6: if the handing occurs the mercuricness does not occur or the eviscerating rudder happens or both. sent7: the frying Sinatra does not occur and/or the cinerariness occurs. sent8: the fact that the non-episcopalness and the ballooning happens is wrong. sent9: the fact that the non-mercuricness and/or the eviscerating rudder occurs is not true if the eviscerating jonah occurs. sent10: that the cuisine happens is brought about by the neuroendocrineness. sent11: both the eviscerating jonah and the laugh occurs. sent12: the fact that the Chicago happens hold if the monomorphemicness occurs. sent13: that the scapulohumeralness occurs leads to that the acupuncture does not occur or the Rorschach occurs or both. sent14: the staging challis happens if either the coarseness or the non-neurotropicness or both occurs. sent15: the unmodifiableness and/or that the lathering insider does not occur is triggered by the unprotectiveness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aeration does not occur and the protectiveness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: that the protectiveness does not occur is not false.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the unmodifiableness happens and/or the lathering insider does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the lathering faintheartedness happens hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the handing happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the mercuricness does not occur and/or the eviscerating rudder occurs.; sent11 -> int6: the eviscerating jonah happens.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the mercuricness does not occur and/or the eviscerating rudder occurs is false.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the aeration does not occur and the protectiveness does not occur is wrong.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the synopticness does not occur is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the synopticness does not occur if the fact that the aeration does not occur and the protectiveness does not occur does not hold. sent2: if the unmodifiableness occurs and/or the lathering insider does not occur the lathering faintheartedness occurs. sent3: the hand is triggered by that the lathering faintheartedness happens. sent4: the circumduction does not occur. sent5: the eviscerating mordant occurs. sent6: if the handing occurs the mercuricness does not occur or the eviscerating rudder happens or both. sent7: the frying Sinatra does not occur and/or the cinerariness occurs. sent8: the fact that the non-episcopalness and the ballooning happens is wrong. sent9: the fact that the non-mercuricness and/or the eviscerating rudder occurs is not true if the eviscerating jonah occurs. sent10: that the cuisine happens is brought about by the neuroendocrineness. sent11: both the eviscerating jonah and the laugh occurs. sent12: the fact that the Chicago happens hold if the monomorphemicness occurs. sent13: that the scapulohumeralness occurs leads to that the acupuncture does not occur or the Rorschach occurs or both. sent14: the staging challis happens if either the coarseness or the non-neurotropicness or both occurs. sent15: the unmodifiableness and/or that the lathering insider does not occur is triggered by the unprotectiveness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aeration does not occur and the protectiveness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: that the protectiveness does not occur is not false.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the unmodifiableness happens and/or the lathering insider does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the lathering faintheartedness happens hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the handing happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the mercuricness does not occur and/or the eviscerating rudder occurs.; sent11 -> int6: the eviscerating jonah happens.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the mercuricness does not occur and/or the eviscerating rudder occurs is false.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the aeration does not occur and the protectiveness does not occur is wrong.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__