the demagoguery and the flawing occurs if the foxhunting does not occur.
sent1: the advisableness does not occur. sent2: if the demagoguery does not occur then that the squeegeeing longroot does not occur and the housework does not occur does not hold. sent3: the foxhunt happens if the fact that the squeegeeing longroot does not occur and the housework does not occur is not right. sent4: the resolving does not occur and/or the restraint occurs if the practice does not occur. sent5: that the practicing does not occur and the pitching Trachelospermum does not occur is caused by the non-advisableness.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the demagoguery does not occur.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the squeegeeing longroot does not occur and the housework does not occur is correct does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the foxhunting happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the foxhunt does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the demagoguery happens.; sent5 & sent1 -> int5: that the practice does not occur and the pitching Trachelospermum does not occur is right.; int5 -> int6: the practicing does not occur.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: either the resolving does not occur or the restraint happens or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the demagoguery and the flawing occurs if the foxhunting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the advisableness does not occur. sent2: if the demagoguery does not occur then that the squeegeeing longroot does not occur and the housework does not occur does not hold. sent3: the foxhunt happens if the fact that the squeegeeing longroot does not occur and the housework does not occur is not right. sent4: the resolving does not occur and/or the restraint occurs if the practice does not occur. sent5: that the practicing does not occur and the pitching Trachelospermum does not occur is caused by the non-advisableness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the demagoguery does not occur.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the squeegeeing longroot does not occur and the housework does not occur is correct does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the foxhunting happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the foxhunt does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the demagoguery happens.; sent5 & sent1 -> int5: that the practice does not occur and the pitching Trachelospermum does not occur is right.; int5 -> int6: the practicing does not occur.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: either the resolving does not occur or the restraint happens or both.; __UNKNOWN__