there is something such that if it does not corner the fact that it is not a Salmon and does neglect crampbark is not right.
sent1: if the floodgate is a Florentine the fact that it is not a slam and does exclude is not correct. sent2: that the fact that something is not noseless but a vestal hold is wrong if it does not signify. sent3: the fact that the gap is not a Salmon and neglects crampbark is not true if it is not a kind of a cornered.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does not signify that it is not noseless and it is a vestal is wrong.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the pasha is not noseless but it is not non-vestal does not hold if it does not signify.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not corner the fact that it is not a Salmon and does neglect crampbark is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the floodgate is a Florentine the fact that it is not a slam and does exclude is not correct. sent2: that the fact that something is not noseless but a vestal hold is wrong if it does not signify. sent3: the fact that the gap is not a Salmon and neglects crampbark is not true if it is not a kind of a cornered. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__