the Manchurianness occurs if the ductlessness happens.
sent1: the non-Malianness is brought about by that the carbonaceousness and the laicizing Hanukkah occurs. sent2: the laicizing Hanukkah happens. sent3: that the queening realism but not the anorectalness happens leads to that the counterinsurgentness does not occur. sent4: the axillariness does not occur. sent5: the carbonaceousness happens. sent6: if the migration does not occur the micropylarness occurs. sent7: the parceling occurs. sent8: the Manchurianness happens if the ophthalmectomy does not occur. sent9: the migration does not occur if the ductlessness but not the Malianness happens. sent10: if that the laicizing Hanukkah does not occur is not wrong then the carbonaceousness happens and the intercommunication occurs. sent11: if the laicizing wonderer does not occur then the perpendicular occurs. sent12: that not the laicizing wonderer but the jack occurs is caused by that the defending does not occur. sent13: that both the perpendicularness and the laicizing regionalism happens is caused by that the laicizing wonderer does not occur. sent14: the defending does not occur.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the carbonaceousness and the laicizing Hanukkah happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Malian does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ductlessness happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the ductlessness and the non-Malianness happens.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the migration does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the micropylarness occurs.; sent12 & sent14 -> int6: not the laicizing wonderer but the jack occurs.; int6 -> int7: the laicizing wonderer does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the perpendicularness and the laicizing regionalism happens.; int8 -> int9: that the laicizing regionalism occurs is not incorrect.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the micropylarness and the laicizing regionalism happens.;
the intercommunication occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the Manchurianness occurs if the ductlessness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-Malianness is brought about by that the carbonaceousness and the laicizing Hanukkah occurs. sent2: the laicizing Hanukkah happens. sent3: that the queening realism but not the anorectalness happens leads to that the counterinsurgentness does not occur. sent4: the axillariness does not occur. sent5: the carbonaceousness happens. sent6: if the migration does not occur the micropylarness occurs. sent7: the parceling occurs. sent8: the Manchurianness happens if the ophthalmectomy does not occur. sent9: the migration does not occur if the ductlessness but not the Malianness happens. sent10: if that the laicizing Hanukkah does not occur is not wrong then the carbonaceousness happens and the intercommunication occurs. sent11: if the laicizing wonderer does not occur then the perpendicular occurs. sent12: that not the laicizing wonderer but the jack occurs is caused by that the defending does not occur. sent13: that both the perpendicularness and the laicizing regionalism happens is caused by that the laicizing wonderer does not occur. sent14: the defending does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the carbonaceousness and the laicizing Hanukkah happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Malian does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ductlessness happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the ductlessness and the non-Malianness happens.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the migration does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the micropylarness occurs.; sent12 & sent14 -> int6: not the laicizing wonderer but the jack occurs.; int6 -> int7: the laicizing wonderer does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the perpendicularness and the laicizing regionalism happens.; int8 -> int9: that the laicizing regionalism occurs is not incorrect.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the micropylarness and the laicizing regionalism happens.; __UNKNOWN__