that the windstorm does not occur is true.
sent1: the cantonalness and the Advent happens if the sermonizing gully does not occur. sent2: that the foreshock does not occur and the dusking does not occur is wrong if the Advent occurs. sent3: the windstorm does not occur if that the thermostaticness does not occur hold. sent4: if the illness occurs the dangerousness does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur. sent5: the non-acinarness is brought about by that the thermostaticness and the fadeout happens. sent6: that the acropetalness does not occur and/or that the factualness does not occur is caused by the non-forteness. sent7: if the spade does not occur then that the non-thermostaticness and the non-acinarness occurs does not hold. sent8: if the fact that the fadeout occurs is false the cloistering fielding occurs. sent9: if the vagary happens the arterialness does not occur. sent10: the spade occurs. sent11: if the acropetalness does not occur then the spading does not occur. sent12: that the sermonizing Skaw does not occur and/or that the forte does not occur prevents the forte. sent13: if the arterialness does not occur then the sermonizing Skaw does not occur and the adoption does not occur. sent14: the cloistering fielding and the fadeout happens. sent15: if that the foreshock does not occur and the dusking does not occur is not right then the vagary occurs. sent16: if the thrombosing does not occur the humaneness and the non-autocatalyticness happens. sent17: that both the non-acinarness and the spading happens is incorrect. sent18: the illness happens. sent19: if both the humaneness and the non-autocatalyticness happens the sermonizing gully does not occur.
sent14 -> int1: the fadeout happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thermostaticness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the thermostaticness and the fadeout happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the acinarness does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: not the acinarness but the spading happens.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the thermostaticness does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the windstorm occurs.
sent4 & sent18 -> int7: the dangerousness does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the thrombosing does not occur.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: both the humaneness and the non-autocatalyticness happens.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the sermonizing gully does not occur.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: both the cantonalness and the Advent occurs.; int11 -> int12: the Advent occurs.; sent2 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the foreshock does not occur and the dusking does not occur is false.; sent15 & int13 -> int14: the vagary happens.; sent9 & int14 -> int15: the arterialness does not occur.; sent13 & int15 -> int16: the sermonizing Skaw does not occur and the adoption does not occur.; int16 -> int17: the sermonizing Skaw does not occur.; int17 -> int18: the sermonizing Skaw does not occur or the forteness does not occur or both.; sent12 & int18 -> int19: the forte does not occur.; sent6 & int19 -> int20: the non-acropetalness or the non-factualness or both occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that the windstorm does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the cantonalness and the Advent happens if the sermonizing gully does not occur. sent2: that the foreshock does not occur and the dusking does not occur is wrong if the Advent occurs. sent3: the windstorm does not occur if that the thermostaticness does not occur hold. sent4: if the illness occurs the dangerousness does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur. sent5: the non-acinarness is brought about by that the thermostaticness and the fadeout happens. sent6: that the acropetalness does not occur and/or that the factualness does not occur is caused by the non-forteness. sent7: if the spade does not occur then that the non-thermostaticness and the non-acinarness occurs does not hold. sent8: if the fact that the fadeout occurs is false the cloistering fielding occurs. sent9: if the vagary happens the arterialness does not occur. sent10: the spade occurs. sent11: if the acropetalness does not occur then the spading does not occur. sent12: that the sermonizing Skaw does not occur and/or that the forte does not occur prevents the forte. sent13: if the arterialness does not occur then the sermonizing Skaw does not occur and the adoption does not occur. sent14: the cloistering fielding and the fadeout happens. sent15: if that the foreshock does not occur and the dusking does not occur is not right then the vagary occurs. sent16: if the thrombosing does not occur the humaneness and the non-autocatalyticness happens. sent17: that both the non-acinarness and the spading happens is incorrect. sent18: the illness happens. sent19: if both the humaneness and the non-autocatalyticness happens the sermonizing gully does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the fadeout happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thermostaticness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the thermostaticness and the fadeout happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the acinarness does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: not the acinarness but the spading happens.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the thermostaticness does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__