the excitation does not occur.
sent1: the soteriologicalness results in that the concocting leader occurs. sent2: the dragging does not occur if the glaring trimaran does not occur and the concocting leader occurs. sent3: if that the frowning and the non-Singhaleseness occurs is wrong then the frowning does not occur. sent4: the glaring trimaran does not occur. sent5: if the melodizing does not occur then the tonelessness occurs and the beginning does not occur. sent6: that the frown happens but the Singhaleseness does not occur is incorrect if the drag does not occur. sent7: the alimentativeness happens if either the vasotomy occurs or the concocting samba does not occur or both. sent8: if the frowning does not occur then the excitation or the spicateness or both happens. sent9: that the concocting volition does not occur is prevented by that the Singhaleseness occurs and/or the frown does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the melodizing does not occur and the beginning does not occur is not true then the fact that the beginning occurs hold. sent11: if that either the non-natriureticness or the non-spicateness or both happens is wrong then the excitation does not occur. sent12: the beginning and the melodizing occurs. sent13: the Singhaleseness occurs and/or the frown occurs. sent14: if the smother does not occur then the fact that the non-natriureticness and/or the non-spicateness occurs is not true. sent15: the decantation does not occur and the geminating Wellington does not occur. sent16: if the decantation does not occur then either the bacterialness or the erythropoieticness or both happens. sent17: if both the concocting volition and the melodizing occurs the smothering does not occur.
sent12 -> int1: the melodizing occurs.;
the tonelessness happens.
sent15 -> int2: the decantation does not occur.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the bacterialness and/or the erythropoieticness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the excitation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the soteriologicalness results in that the concocting leader occurs. sent2: the dragging does not occur if the glaring trimaran does not occur and the concocting leader occurs. sent3: if that the frowning and the non-Singhaleseness occurs is wrong then the frowning does not occur. sent4: the glaring trimaran does not occur. sent5: if the melodizing does not occur then the tonelessness occurs and the beginning does not occur. sent6: that the frown happens but the Singhaleseness does not occur is incorrect if the drag does not occur. sent7: the alimentativeness happens if either the vasotomy occurs or the concocting samba does not occur or both. sent8: if the frowning does not occur then the excitation or the spicateness or both happens. sent9: that the concocting volition does not occur is prevented by that the Singhaleseness occurs and/or the frown does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the melodizing does not occur and the beginning does not occur is not true then the fact that the beginning occurs hold. sent11: if that either the non-natriureticness or the non-spicateness or both happens is wrong then the excitation does not occur. sent12: the beginning and the melodizing occurs. sent13: the Singhaleseness occurs and/or the frown occurs. sent14: if the smother does not occur then the fact that the non-natriureticness and/or the non-spicateness occurs is not true. sent15: the decantation does not occur and the geminating Wellington does not occur. sent16: if the decantation does not occur then either the bacterialness or the erythropoieticness or both happens. sent17: if both the concocting volition and the melodizing occurs the smothering does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the melodizing occurs.; __UNKNOWN__