that the nephrolith does not hunger neuroanatomy hold.
sent1: something is an atoll and does not burglarize checkpoint. sent2: if something is consonantal the fact that it is anaclinal and it is not a Blucher is incorrect. sent3: that the fact that the loiterer hungers yew but it is not a French is wrong if there is something such that it is not a caster is not incorrect. sent4: the loiterer is not tender if the fact that the HF does not burglarize checkpoint and is a kind of an atoll is not right. sent5: that the greenskeeper is a tiebreaker is true if that it is both anaclinal and not a Blucher is incorrect. sent6: that the fact that the HF does not burglarize checkpoint but it is an atoll is true is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a tiebreaker. sent7: there exists something such that it orchestrates nonviolence. sent8: if that the loiterer does hunger yew but it is non-French is wrong the HF does not tender. sent9: the fact that the Winchester is worldly and a homebuilder is not true if something orchestrates nonviolence. sent10: the fact that either something is a caster or it is an astringent or both does not hold if it does not hunger yew. sent11: if either the Winchester is not a Pelecanidae or it is not consonantal or both then the greenskeeper is consonantal. sent12: something is not a Pelecanidae and/or it is not consonantal if the fact that it does not hunger Schopenhauer is not false. sent13: the Winchester does not hunger Schopenhauer if the fact that it is both not unworldly and a homebuilder does not hold. sent14: if the East-sider is a caster then the energizer is a kind of an astringent. sent15: the energizer is a French and it does hunger yew if there is something such that it is not a kind of a tender. sent16: something is an atoll. sent17: if the fact that the HF is non-tender is true the nephrolith does hunger neuroanatomy. sent18: the energizer is not an astringent if there is something such that it is a kind of an atoll and it does not burglarize checkpoint. sent19: there exists something such that it is a kind of a caster. sent20: the fact that the East-sider is nonastringent thing that is not a caster does not hold if the energizer does hunger yew.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the East-sider is a kind of a caster.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the energizer is an astringent.; sent1 & sent18 -> int2: the energizer is not an astringent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the East-sider is not a caster.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a caster.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the fact that the loiterer hungers yew but it is not a French is not incorrect is not correct.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the HF does not tender.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the nephrolith does not hunger neuroanatomy.
sent2 -> int8: that the fact that the greenskeeper is anaclinal but it is not a Blucher is right is false if it is not non-consonantal.; sent12 -> int9: the Winchester is not a Pelecanidae or it is not consonantal or both if it does not hunger Schopenhauer.; sent7 & sent9 -> int10: that the Winchester is worldly and it is a homebuilder is not correct.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the Winchester does not hunger Schopenhauer.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the Winchester is not a Pelecanidae and/or is not consonantal.; sent11 & int12 -> int13: that the greenskeeper is consonantal is true.; int8 & int13 -> int14: that the greenskeeper is anaclinal and is not a Blucher is false.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the greenskeeper is a tiebreaker.; int15 -> int16: something is a tiebreaker.; int16 & sent6 -> int17: that the HF does not burglarize checkpoint but it is an atoll is false.; sent4 & int17 -> int18: the loiterer is not a tender.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that it does not tender.; int19 & sent15 -> int20: the energizer is a French and hungers yew.; int20 -> int21: the energizer hungers yew.; sent20 & int21 -> int22: the fact that the East-sider is not an astringent and it is not a caster is incorrect.; int22 -> int23: there exists something such that that it is not an astringent and not a caster does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the nephrolith does not hunger neuroanatomy hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is an atoll and does not burglarize checkpoint. sent2: if something is consonantal the fact that it is anaclinal and it is not a Blucher is incorrect. sent3: that the fact that the loiterer hungers yew but it is not a French is wrong if there is something such that it is not a caster is not incorrect. sent4: the loiterer is not tender if the fact that the HF does not burglarize checkpoint and is a kind of an atoll is not right. sent5: that the greenskeeper is a tiebreaker is true if that it is both anaclinal and not a Blucher is incorrect. sent6: that the fact that the HF does not burglarize checkpoint but it is an atoll is true is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a tiebreaker. sent7: there exists something such that it orchestrates nonviolence. sent8: if that the loiterer does hunger yew but it is non-French is wrong the HF does not tender. sent9: the fact that the Winchester is worldly and a homebuilder is not true if something orchestrates nonviolence. sent10: the fact that either something is a caster or it is an astringent or both does not hold if it does not hunger yew. sent11: if either the Winchester is not a Pelecanidae or it is not consonantal or both then the greenskeeper is consonantal. sent12: something is not a Pelecanidae and/or it is not consonantal if the fact that it does not hunger Schopenhauer is not false. sent13: the Winchester does not hunger Schopenhauer if the fact that it is both not unworldly and a homebuilder does not hold. sent14: if the East-sider is a caster then the energizer is a kind of an astringent. sent15: the energizer is a French and it does hunger yew if there is something such that it is not a kind of a tender. sent16: something is an atoll. sent17: if the fact that the HF is non-tender is true the nephrolith does hunger neuroanatomy. sent18: the energizer is not an astringent if there is something such that it is a kind of an atoll and it does not burglarize checkpoint. sent19: there exists something such that it is a kind of a caster. sent20: the fact that the East-sider is nonastringent thing that is not a caster does not hold if the energizer does hunger yew. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the East-sider is a kind of a caster.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the energizer is an astringent.; sent1 & sent18 -> int2: the energizer is not an astringent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the East-sider is not a caster.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a caster.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the fact that the loiterer hungers yew but it is not a French is not incorrect is not correct.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the HF does not tender.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__