that the fact that there exists something such that if it does not weave dovecote and is tympanic it is a pooler is not false does not hold.
sent1: the gynoecium is a pastiche if it weaves dovecote and does weave pipeline. sent2: there exists something such that if it does rear ironworker and is a kind of a macaw it is a frailty. sent3: if the trombonist nestles and it is a kind of a Teredinidae then it is tympanic. sent4: if the ironworker does weave merit and it is sacramental then it is afebrile. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a theist and it is fearful then it butts Willebrand. sent6: the ironworker does cozen adiposity if it does not rear ironworker and is a kind of an eyesight. sent7: the symmetry is a kind of a WTC if it is a Diptera and it rears ironworker. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a humectant and it is sacramental then it is a great. sent9: if the ironworker is sacramental and it is a vaudeville it is scriptural. sent10: if the dovecote is tympanic and identifies then it is afebrile. sent11: the ironworker cozens blend if it does not weave dovecote and it is monetary. sent12: if the fact that the ironworker does not weave dovecote and is tympanic is correct then the fact that it is a kind of a pooler is true. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is both resolute and not non-theist hold it is a wedge. sent14: if the ironworker is non-Catalan thing that does cozen trombonist then it is a Venice. sent15: the ironworker is a moneymaker if it is not a covariation and it is radiological. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an eyesight and it is a kind of an eyestrain then it does butt mortise. sent17: the ironworker is tympanic if it is not a wedge and is afebrile. sent18: if the ironworker is sacramental thing that is a pooler it is not soluble. sent19: if the varnisher is a kind of a Venice and weaves celestite it cozens Hebbel. sent20: there exists something such that if it does rear iodoform and it is a dynamic the fact that it is palatial is not wrong.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that there exists something such that if it does not weave dovecote and is tympanic it is a pooler is not false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the gynoecium is a pastiche if it weaves dovecote and does weave pipeline. sent2: there exists something such that if it does rear ironworker and is a kind of a macaw it is a frailty. sent3: if the trombonist nestles and it is a kind of a Teredinidae then it is tympanic. sent4: if the ironworker does weave merit and it is sacramental then it is afebrile. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a theist and it is fearful then it butts Willebrand. sent6: the ironworker does cozen adiposity if it does not rear ironworker and is a kind of an eyesight. sent7: the symmetry is a kind of a WTC if it is a Diptera and it rears ironworker. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a humectant and it is sacramental then it is a great. sent9: if the ironworker is sacramental and it is a vaudeville it is scriptural. sent10: if the dovecote is tympanic and identifies then it is afebrile. sent11: the ironworker cozens blend if it does not weave dovecote and it is monetary. sent12: if the fact that the ironworker does not weave dovecote and is tympanic is correct then the fact that it is a kind of a pooler is true. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is both resolute and not non-theist hold it is a wedge. sent14: if the ironworker is non-Catalan thing that does cozen trombonist then it is a Venice. sent15: the ironworker is a moneymaker if it is not a covariation and it is radiological. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an eyesight and it is a kind of an eyestrain then it does butt mortise. sent17: the ironworker is tympanic if it is not a wedge and is afebrile. sent18: if the ironworker is sacramental thing that is a pooler it is not soluble. sent19: if the varnisher is a kind of a Venice and weaves celestite it cozens Hebbel. sent20: there exists something such that if it does rear iodoform and it is a dynamic the fact that it is palatial is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__