that the illustration does not deflower plesiosaur hold.
sent1: that the illustration does not deflower plesiosaur is not incorrect if it is a hydromorphone and it is not cheliceral. sent2: the illustration does not deflower plesiosaur if the fact that the seabag is a racket but not a promise is incorrect. sent3: the illustration is not a racket if that the seabag is a bronco but it does not deflower plesiosaur is incorrect. sent4: if the seabag is a kind of a racket that does not promise it is not a bronco. sent5: the seabag is a kind of a bronco and it deflowers golfcart.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seabag is a racket but it does not promise.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the seabag is not a bronco is not incorrect.; sent5 -> int2: the seabag is a kind of a bronco.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the seabag does racket but it is not a promise does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the illustration does not deflower plesiosaur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the illustration does not deflower plesiosaur is not incorrect if it is a hydromorphone and it is not cheliceral. sent2: the illustration does not deflower plesiosaur if the fact that the seabag is a racket but not a promise is incorrect. sent3: the illustration is not a racket if that the seabag is a bronco but it does not deflower plesiosaur is incorrect. sent4: if the seabag is a kind of a racket that does not promise it is not a bronco. sent5: the seabag is a kind of a bronco and it deflowers golfcart. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seabag is a racket but it does not promise.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the seabag is not a bronco is not incorrect.; sent5 -> int2: the seabag is a kind of a bronco.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the seabag does racket but it is not a promise does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__