the ceibo is not a RI if that the tearaway is carpellary is not wrong.
sent1: if the ceibo is not caesural it is not gloveless. sent2: the ceibo is full-term. sent3: the fact that the ceibo is both caesural and undesirable is not true if there exists something such that it is carpellary. sent4: the tearaway is not a kind of a Nymphalidae if it is not carpellary. sent5: the ceibo is non-carpellary. sent6: that the magneto is carpellary and it is a kind of an etymology is not true if there are adaptive things. sent7: if the tearaway is carpellary that the ceibo is a RI hold. sent8: the stayer is not a kind of a RI. sent9: the fact that the tearaway is desirable if that the tearaway is caesural and it is carpellary is wrong is correct. sent10: the ceibo is a kind of a RI. sent11: if there are caesural things then that the ceibo is carpellary and it is a RI is false. sent12: the tearaway is a RI if the fact that it is both undesirable and not non-carpellary is not right. sent13: the tearaway is a RI. sent14: the ceibo is homocercal. sent15: the ropewalker is not caesural. sent16: something is a RI. sent17: the tearaway is entrepreneurial. sent18: the ceibo is a kind of a RI if that it is caesural and it is an undesirable is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tearaway is not non-carpellary.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is carpellary.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the ceibo is caesural and it is not desirable is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the ceibo is not a RI if that the tearaway is carpellary is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ceibo is not caesural it is not gloveless. sent2: the ceibo is full-term. sent3: the fact that the ceibo is both caesural and undesirable is not true if there exists something such that it is carpellary. sent4: the tearaway is not a kind of a Nymphalidae if it is not carpellary. sent5: the ceibo is non-carpellary. sent6: that the magneto is carpellary and it is a kind of an etymology is not true if there are adaptive things. sent7: if the tearaway is carpellary that the ceibo is a RI hold. sent8: the stayer is not a kind of a RI. sent9: the fact that the tearaway is desirable if that the tearaway is caesural and it is carpellary is wrong is correct. sent10: the ceibo is a kind of a RI. sent11: if there are caesural things then that the ceibo is carpellary and it is a RI is false. sent12: the tearaway is a RI if the fact that it is both undesirable and not non-carpellary is not right. sent13: the tearaway is a RI. sent14: the ceibo is homocercal. sent15: the ropewalker is not caesural. sent16: something is a RI. sent17: the tearaway is entrepreneurial. sent18: the ceibo is a kind of a RI if that it is caesural and it is an undesirable is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tearaway is not non-carpellary.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is carpellary.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the ceibo is caesural and it is not desirable is false.; __UNKNOWN__