there is something such that if it is non-kinetic a scribble that it does not wail Chloroxylon is not wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a niff and it is a arsine it is not a bronchoscope. sent2: there exists something such that if it is non-kinetic a scribble it wails Chloroxylon. sent3: if something does not demagnetize gabardine and is a scribble it does not maintain Pashto. sent4: the trandolapril does not wail Chloroxylon if it is kinetic and it is a kind of a scribble. sent5: there is something such that if it is a flower-of-an-hour and it is a Chloroxylon it is non-dichromatic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a sprechgesang and it is a kind of a marbles then it is not a retronym. sent7: if a non-weighty thing does maintain Brasilia then it is not calisthenics. sent8: if the trandolapril is a kind of non-kinetic thing that scribbles it does not wail Chloroxylon. sent9: if the trandolapril is both not kinetic and a scribble then it does wail Chloroxylon. sent10: if the trandolapril is non-Arawakan thing that does shimmer then it does not wail Chloroxylon. sent11: the fact that the economist is not indistinct hold if it does wail fingerprinting and it is a flower-of-an-hour. sent12: if something that does not demagnetize backlog is calisthenics it is not a kind of a tradecraft. sent13: there is something such that if it is not Mozartian and not non-dichromatic it is not odorous. sent14: the trandolapril does not compose if it does not slow and it wails Chloroxylon. sent15: there exists something such that if it is kinetic thing that does scribble it does not wail Chloroxylon. sent16: there is something such that if it contracts and it is a crane then it does not wail griminess.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
if the best does not demagnetize gabardine but it is a scribble then it does not maintain Pashto.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is non-kinetic a scribble that it does not wail Chloroxylon is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a niff and it is a arsine it is not a bronchoscope. sent2: there exists something such that if it is non-kinetic a scribble it wails Chloroxylon. sent3: if something does not demagnetize gabardine and is a scribble it does not maintain Pashto. sent4: the trandolapril does not wail Chloroxylon if it is kinetic and it is a kind of a scribble. sent5: there is something such that if it is a flower-of-an-hour and it is a Chloroxylon it is non-dichromatic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a sprechgesang and it is a kind of a marbles then it is not a retronym. sent7: if a non-weighty thing does maintain Brasilia then it is not calisthenics. sent8: if the trandolapril is a kind of non-kinetic thing that scribbles it does not wail Chloroxylon. sent9: if the trandolapril is both not kinetic and a scribble then it does wail Chloroxylon. sent10: if the trandolapril is non-Arawakan thing that does shimmer then it does not wail Chloroxylon. sent11: the fact that the economist is not indistinct hold if it does wail fingerprinting and it is a flower-of-an-hour. sent12: if something that does not demagnetize backlog is calisthenics it is not a kind of a tradecraft. sent13: there is something such that if it is not Mozartian and not non-dichromatic it is not odorous. sent14: the trandolapril does not compose if it does not slow and it wails Chloroxylon. sent15: there exists something such that if it is kinetic thing that does scribble it does not wail Chloroxylon. sent16: there is something such that if it contracts and it is a crane then it does not wail griminess. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__