the shorts is not a kind of a Confucianism.
sent1: if the eyelet is oceanic then it is intertidal and/or it is not a mailbag. sent2: the speaker does jack if the eyelet does not investigate autogamy and is not a jack. sent3: the eyelet is oceanic and it is an advancing. sent4: the speaker does hem. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is perianal and it is an advancing does not hold the missile is not intertidal. sent6: the speaker does not investigate autogamy and does not diffuse fleetness if that there is something such that it is not a mailbag is not wrong. sent7: something is a hem if it jacks. sent8: if the speaker is a kind of a hem then the shorts does not investigate babu and is not impressionable. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is perianal and it is an advancing is incorrect. sent10: if something does jack then it is a kind of a Confucianism. sent11: if something that does not investigate babu is not impressionable it does jack. sent12: if the missile does not investigate autogamy and is oceanic the eyelet does not investigate autogamy. sent13: the speaker is not a kind of a wrench and is not a waratah. sent14: if there is something such that it is intertidal and/or it is not a mailbag the shorts is not a kind of a mailbag. sent15: if something does not diffuse fleetness then the fact that it is both not a jacks and a hem is not true. sent16: the shorts is a kind of a hem if the speaker is a kind of a jacks. sent17: if something is an infrastructure then that it does diffuse bistro is not incorrect. sent18: that the algometer is a Confucianism if there is something such that that it does not jack and it is a kind of a hem is not right is true. sent19: something does not investigate autogamy but it is oceanic if it is not intertidal.
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the shorts does not investigate babu and is not impressionable.; sent11 -> int2: the shorts is a jacks if it does not investigate babu and is not impressionable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shorts is a jacks.; sent10 -> int4: if the shorts does jack the fact that it is a Confucianism is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the algometer is a Confucianism.
sent15 -> int5: that the speaker is not a kind of a jacks and hems is not correct if it does not diffuse fleetness.; sent3 -> int6: the eyelet is oceanic.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the eyelet is intertidal or it is not a kind of a mailbag or both.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is intertidal or is not a mailbag or both.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the shorts is not a kind of a mailbag.; int9 -> int10: something is not a mailbag.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the speaker does not investigate autogamy and does not diffuse fleetness.; int11 -> int12: the speaker does not diffuse fleetness.; int5 & int12 -> int13: that the speaker is both not a jacks and a hem does not hold.; int13 -> int14: that there is something such that the fact that it is not a jacks and it does hem is not right hold.; int14 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the shorts is not a kind of a Confucianism. ; $context$ = sent1: if the eyelet is oceanic then it is intertidal and/or it is not a mailbag. sent2: the speaker does jack if the eyelet does not investigate autogamy and is not a jack. sent3: the eyelet is oceanic and it is an advancing. sent4: the speaker does hem. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is perianal and it is an advancing does not hold the missile is not intertidal. sent6: the speaker does not investigate autogamy and does not diffuse fleetness if that there is something such that it is not a mailbag is not wrong. sent7: something is a hem if it jacks. sent8: if the speaker is a kind of a hem then the shorts does not investigate babu and is not impressionable. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is perianal and it is an advancing is incorrect. sent10: if something does jack then it is a kind of a Confucianism. sent11: if something that does not investigate babu is not impressionable it does jack. sent12: if the missile does not investigate autogamy and is oceanic the eyelet does not investigate autogamy. sent13: the speaker is not a kind of a wrench and is not a waratah. sent14: if there is something such that it is intertidal and/or it is not a mailbag the shorts is not a kind of a mailbag. sent15: if something does not diffuse fleetness then the fact that it is both not a jacks and a hem is not true. sent16: the shorts is a kind of a hem if the speaker is a kind of a jacks. sent17: if something is an infrastructure then that it does diffuse bistro is not incorrect. sent18: that the algometer is a Confucianism if there is something such that that it does not jack and it is a kind of a hem is not right is true. sent19: something does not investigate autogamy but it is oceanic if it is not intertidal. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the shorts does not investigate babu and is not impressionable.; sent11 -> int2: the shorts is a jacks if it does not investigate babu and is not impressionable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shorts is a jacks.; sent10 -> int4: if the shorts does jack the fact that it is a Confucianism is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__