the trestlework is a unsanitariness.
sent1: the trestlework is not a licentiousness. sent2: the trestlework is not a program. sent3: the langouste is a lather and it is a kind of a mediator. sent4: if the gallfly is not a Monsignor the trestlework is a unsanitariness but it is not a Zoroastrianism. sent5: if the langouste lathers then the fact that it is not a kind of a Monsignor and it does bypass challenging is not right. sent6: the fact that the trestlework is not a kind of a Monsignor is not incorrect. sent7: if the trestlework is a unsanitariness then it is a Monsignor. sent8: the gallfly is a Monsignor if there exists something such that that it is not a Monsignor and it does bypass challenging is not right. sent9: if there is something such that it is not a lather then the gallfly is a kind of a Monsignor. sent10: the maxi is a kind of a Monsignor if it burdens. sent11: if something is a Monsignor then it is a unsanitariness. sent12: the langouste is a lather if the fact that it is not a lather and not a mediator is wrong. sent13: if that something is not a unsanitariness and it is not eradicable is not true then it is a unsanitariness. sent14: the fact that the langouste is a mediator is correct. sent15: something is a unsanitariness if that it is not eradicable and it is not a unsanitariness does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trestlework is a kind of a unsanitariness.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the trestlework is a kind of a Monsignor.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the trestlework is not a Zoroastrianism.
$hypothesis$ = the trestlework is a unsanitariness. ; $context$ = sent1: the trestlework is not a licentiousness. sent2: the trestlework is not a program. sent3: the langouste is a lather and it is a kind of a mediator. sent4: if the gallfly is not a Monsignor the trestlework is a unsanitariness but it is not a Zoroastrianism. sent5: if the langouste lathers then the fact that it is not a kind of a Monsignor and it does bypass challenging is not right. sent6: the fact that the trestlework is not a kind of a Monsignor is not incorrect. sent7: if the trestlework is a unsanitariness then it is a Monsignor. sent8: the gallfly is a Monsignor if there exists something such that that it is not a Monsignor and it does bypass challenging is not right. sent9: if there is something such that it is not a lather then the gallfly is a kind of a Monsignor. sent10: the maxi is a kind of a Monsignor if it burdens. sent11: if something is a Monsignor then it is a unsanitariness. sent12: the langouste is a lather if the fact that it is not a lather and not a mediator is wrong. sent13: if that something is not a unsanitariness and it is not eradicable is not true then it is a unsanitariness. sent14: the fact that the langouste is a mediator is correct. sent15: something is a unsanitariness if that it is not eradicable and it is not a unsanitariness does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trestlework is a kind of a unsanitariness.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the trestlework is a kind of a Monsignor.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__