the cornhusker does not unmake oddness.
sent1: the taxman is a kind of a rendezvous. sent2: if the ceftriaxone is non-commensal then that the leafhopper is not a raven but a rendezvous is not false. sent3: if a commensal thing is a squash the cornhusker is adnexal. sent4: if the pastern does unmake pipsissewa the Depokene is unworthy. sent5: the leafhopper is adnexal. sent6: the daffodil is a raven. sent7: the leafhopper is a kind of a pin that gluttonizes. sent8: the ceftriaxone does not raven. sent9: the ryegrass is adnexal. sent10: something does not squash if that it is adnexal and it squash is not correct. sent11: that the leafhopper is not bromidic is right if it is not a kind of a raven and rendezvous. sent12: the leafhopper is bromidic. sent13: there exists something such that it does rendezvous and it is commensal. sent14: either the pastern defibrillates monotheism or it does unmake pipsissewa or both if the deuterium does not eliminate winnings. sent15: that the leafhopper is adnexal and it is a kind of a squash is wrong if there exists something such that it eliminates usufruct. sent16: there are lower-class things. sent17: the ceftriaxone squashes. sent18: the cornhusker does unmake oddness if it is adnexal. sent19: if the pastern defibrillates monotheism then the Depokene is unworthy. sent20: the deuterium does not eliminate winnings. sent21: the cornhusker is a raven. sent22: an unworthy thing eliminates usufruct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ceftriaxone is not a commensal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the leafhopper is not a raven but a rendezvous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the leafhopper is not bromidic.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the ceftriaxone is a commensal is not false.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the ceftriaxone is a commensal and it does squash.; int5 -> int6: something is a commensal and it is a squash.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: that the cornhusker is adnexal hold.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the cornhusker does not unmake oddness.
sent10 -> int8: the leafhopper does not squash if the fact that it is adnexal and it is a kind of a squash is not right.; sent22 -> int9: if that the Depokene is unworthy is not false it eliminates usufruct.; sent14 & sent20 -> int10: either the pastern defibrillates monotheism or it does unmake pipsissewa or both.; int10 & sent19 & sent4 -> int11: the Depokene is unworthy.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the Depokene does eliminate usufruct.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does eliminate usufruct.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the fact that the leafhopper is adnexal and it squashes is incorrect.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the leafhopper is not a squash.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it does not squash.;
$hypothesis$ = the cornhusker does not unmake oddness. ; $context$ = sent1: the taxman is a kind of a rendezvous. sent2: if the ceftriaxone is non-commensal then that the leafhopper is not a raven but a rendezvous is not false. sent3: if a commensal thing is a squash the cornhusker is adnexal. sent4: if the pastern does unmake pipsissewa the Depokene is unworthy. sent5: the leafhopper is adnexal. sent6: the daffodil is a raven. sent7: the leafhopper is a kind of a pin that gluttonizes. sent8: the ceftriaxone does not raven. sent9: the ryegrass is adnexal. sent10: something does not squash if that it is adnexal and it squash is not correct. sent11: that the leafhopper is not bromidic is right if it is not a kind of a raven and rendezvous. sent12: the leafhopper is bromidic. sent13: there exists something such that it does rendezvous and it is commensal. sent14: either the pastern defibrillates monotheism or it does unmake pipsissewa or both if the deuterium does not eliminate winnings. sent15: that the leafhopper is adnexal and it is a kind of a squash is wrong if there exists something such that it eliminates usufruct. sent16: there are lower-class things. sent17: the ceftriaxone squashes. sent18: the cornhusker does unmake oddness if it is adnexal. sent19: if the pastern defibrillates monotheism then the Depokene is unworthy. sent20: the deuterium does not eliminate winnings. sent21: the cornhusker is a raven. sent22: an unworthy thing eliminates usufruct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ceftriaxone is not a commensal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the leafhopper is not a raven but a rendezvous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the leafhopper is not bromidic.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the ceftriaxone is a commensal is not false.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the ceftriaxone is a commensal and it does squash.; int5 -> int6: something is a commensal and it is a squash.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: that the cornhusker is adnexal hold.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__