that the awakening happens is prevented by that the botulinalness happens.
sent1: the fact that the deglazing Zingiber does not occur is not false. sent2: that the verbifying cable occurs and the monometallicness occurs is not correct if the barring car-ferry does not occur. sent3: that the verbifying Manichaean occurs but the .38-caliberness does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the niceness does not occur then that that the barring bubbliness and the non-processionalness happens is not incorrect is false. sent5: that the TAT occurs brings about that the endorsing happens. sent6: if that the candlelight but not the links occurs is false the awakening does not occur. sent7: that the remission but not the termination happens is incorrect. sent8: that the candlelight happens and the links does not occur is false if the polyvalentness does not occur. sent9: if that the verbifying Wheatstone occurs or the pouting occurs or both is correct the uncommonness does not occur. sent10: that the disembarrassment does not occur hold if the fact that the composite but not the plonk occurs is not right. sent11: either that the prepayment occurs or that the polyvalentness occurs or both leads to the non-botulinalness. sent12: the fact that the agraphicness but not the polkaing occurs is not correct. sent13: if the retaining does not occur the fact that the narcotraffic and the verbifying Luba occurs is false. sent14: the curtsying happens. sent15: the hemolyticness does not occur. sent16: the defiance happens if that the culinariness and the non-artificialness occurs is false. sent17: the vespers does not occur. sent18: if that the extricableness but not the dextrorotation happens does not hold the deglazing tempered occurs. sent19: the fact that both the halma and the unalertness happens is not true. sent20: the bedewing cheesecake does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the botulinalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polyvalentness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the prepayment happens and/or the polyvalentness occurs.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the botulinalness does not occur is right.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the polyvalentness does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the candlelight happens but the links does not occur is not right.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the awakening does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the awakening happens is prevented by that the botulinalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the deglazing Zingiber does not occur is not false. sent2: that the verbifying cable occurs and the monometallicness occurs is not correct if the barring car-ferry does not occur. sent3: that the verbifying Manichaean occurs but the .38-caliberness does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the niceness does not occur then that that the barring bubbliness and the non-processionalness happens is not incorrect is false. sent5: that the TAT occurs brings about that the endorsing happens. sent6: if that the candlelight but not the links occurs is false the awakening does not occur. sent7: that the remission but not the termination happens is incorrect. sent8: that the candlelight happens and the links does not occur is false if the polyvalentness does not occur. sent9: if that the verbifying Wheatstone occurs or the pouting occurs or both is correct the uncommonness does not occur. sent10: that the disembarrassment does not occur hold if the fact that the composite but not the plonk occurs is not right. sent11: either that the prepayment occurs or that the polyvalentness occurs or both leads to the non-botulinalness. sent12: the fact that the agraphicness but not the polkaing occurs is not correct. sent13: if the retaining does not occur the fact that the narcotraffic and the verbifying Luba occurs is false. sent14: the curtsying happens. sent15: the hemolyticness does not occur. sent16: the defiance happens if that the culinariness and the non-artificialness occurs is false. sent17: the vespers does not occur. sent18: if that the extricableness but not the dextrorotation happens does not hold the deglazing tempered occurs. sent19: the fact that both the halma and the unalertness happens is not true. sent20: the bedewing cheesecake does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the botulinalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polyvalentness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the prepayment happens and/or the polyvalentness occurs.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the botulinalness does not occur is right.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the polyvalentness does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the candlelight happens but the links does not occur is not right.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the awakening does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__