that the Hydra does not debar snorer is not wrong.
sent1: there is something such that it is not a peak and it is a approachability. sent2: the seigneur does desecrate breeze if the fact that the tailorbird debars extravaganza is right. sent3: the seigneur does not desecrate breeze if there exists something such that that it is not a peak and is a approachability is not true. sent4: That the extravaganza does debar tailorbird is right. sent5: that the tailorbird does debar extravaganza is right. sent6: something does debar snorer if it is both not a peak and a approachability.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Hydra is both not a peak and a approachability is false.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not peak and it is a approachability is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the seigneur does not desecrate breeze.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the seigneur does desecrate breeze.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Hydra is not a peak but it is a approachability.; sent6 -> int6: if the Hydra is not a peak but a approachability it debars snorer.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Hydra does not debar snorer is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not a peak and it is a approachability. sent2: the seigneur does desecrate breeze if the fact that the tailorbird debars extravaganza is right. sent3: the seigneur does not desecrate breeze if there exists something such that that it is not a peak and is a approachability is not true. sent4: That the extravaganza does debar tailorbird is right. sent5: that the tailorbird does debar extravaganza is right. sent6: something does debar snorer if it is both not a peak and a approachability. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Hydra is both not a peak and a approachability is false.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not peak and it is a approachability is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the seigneur does not desecrate breeze.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the seigneur does desecrate breeze.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Hydra is not a peak but it is a approachability.; sent6 -> int6: if the Hydra is not a peak but a approachability it debars snorer.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__