that the kilt is both not tactless and not a barricade is false.
sent1: the kilt is non-naturistic thing that is not a barricade. sent2: that the ethnologist is a demography is not false if the absentee is naturistic. sent3: the fact that something is both androgynous and leprous is wrong if it is not tactless. sent4: the fact that the inosine is not a generation but it ransoms is not right. sent5: the committeewoman is not analogous if the fact that the lomustine is androgynous and leprous is not correct. sent6: the fact that the ethnologist is a majority and non-analogous is not right if the committeewoman is not non-analogous. sent7: if the inosine is residential the absentee is naturistic. sent8: the inosine is residential if that it is not a generation and ransoms is false. sent9: if the lomustine is tactless the kilt is tactless and it does not barricade. sent10: something that is a demography is a majority that is not analogous. sent11: if the kilt is androgynous the lomustine is a barricade. sent12: something is a barricade if the fact that it is not a kind of a majority and is not analogous does not hold.
sent3 -> int1: that the lomustine is androgynous and it is leprous is not right if the fact that it is not tactless is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lomustine is not tactless.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the lomustine is androgynous and it is leprous does not hold is not incorrect.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the committeewoman is not analogous hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the ethnologist is both a majority and not analogous is not correct.; sent10 -> int5: if the ethnologist is a demography then it is a majority and it is not analogous.; sent8 & sent4 -> int6: the inosine is residential.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the absentee is naturistic.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the ethnologist is a kind of a demography.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the ethnologist is a majority but it is not analogous hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the fact that the lomustine is tactless is not incorrect.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the kilt is non-tactless thing that is not a barricade is not right.
sent12 -> int12: the committeewoman is a barricade if the fact that it is not a majority and not analogous is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the kilt is both not tactless and not a barricade is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the kilt is non-naturistic thing that is not a barricade. sent2: that the ethnologist is a demography is not false if the absentee is naturistic. sent3: the fact that something is both androgynous and leprous is wrong if it is not tactless. sent4: the fact that the inosine is not a generation but it ransoms is not right. sent5: the committeewoman is not analogous if the fact that the lomustine is androgynous and leprous is not correct. sent6: the fact that the ethnologist is a majority and non-analogous is not right if the committeewoman is not non-analogous. sent7: if the inosine is residential the absentee is naturistic. sent8: the inosine is residential if that it is not a generation and ransoms is false. sent9: if the lomustine is tactless the kilt is tactless and it does not barricade. sent10: something that is a demography is a majority that is not analogous. sent11: if the kilt is androgynous the lomustine is a barricade. sent12: something is a barricade if the fact that it is not a kind of a majority and is not analogous does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that the lomustine is androgynous and it is leprous is not right if the fact that it is not tactless is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lomustine is not tactless.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the lomustine is androgynous and it is leprous does not hold is not incorrect.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the committeewoman is not analogous hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the ethnologist is both a majority and not analogous is not correct.; sent10 -> int5: if the ethnologist is a demography then it is a majority and it is not analogous.; sent8 & sent4 -> int6: the inosine is residential.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the absentee is naturistic.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the ethnologist is a kind of a demography.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the ethnologist is a majority but it is not analogous hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the fact that the lomustine is tactless is not incorrect.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__