the discovering does not occur.
sent1: that the discovering does not occur is prevented by the sniping. sent2: the unservileness is brought about by either that the galvanism does not occur or the sniping or both. sent3: the concentration does not occur. sent4: that the clamor but not the hazard happens prevents that the galvanism happens. sent5: if the concentration does not occur then the galvanism but not the denying Thatcherism happens. sent6: if the sniping does not occur the clamoring occurs and the hazard does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snipe does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the clamoring but not the hazard occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the galvanism does not occur.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the galvanism but not the denying Thatcherism occurs.; int3 -> int4: the galvanism happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sniping occurs.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the unservileness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the discovering does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the discovering does not occur is prevented by the sniping. sent2: the unservileness is brought about by either that the galvanism does not occur or the sniping or both. sent3: the concentration does not occur. sent4: that the clamor but not the hazard happens prevents that the galvanism happens. sent5: if the concentration does not occur then the galvanism but not the denying Thatcherism happens. sent6: if the sniping does not occur the clamoring occurs and the hazard does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snipe does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the clamoring but not the hazard occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the galvanism does not occur.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the galvanism but not the denying Thatcherism occurs.; int3 -> int4: the galvanism happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sniping occurs.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__