that the Father does not tweak or it is not dishonest or both is incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that something is sciatic but it is not developmental is wrong then it is not sciatic. sent2: that the treadmill is a one-upmanship and it is a gitano is right. sent3: the swatch is dermatologic thing that is noncellular. sent4: if something does not spring-clean apophatism then the fact that the parishioner is both sciatic and not developmental is false. sent5: there exists something such that that it is not cementitious and it does spring-clean apophatism does not hold. sent6: the treadmill does not spring-clean apophatism if there is something such that the fact that it is not cementitious and it does spring-clean apophatism is not correct. sent7: if the swatch is not a gitano the parishioner does not spring-clean TLC. sent8: if the parishioner is not sciatic the swatch is not sciatic. sent9: The TLC spring-cleans parishioner. sent10: either something is a matricide or it does wallop or both if it is not sciatic. sent11: that the swatch is a gitano and a prang is false if it is not an amputation. sent12: if the fact that something is dermatologic and does not spring-clean TLC does not hold then it is an amputation. sent13: the parishioner spring-cleans TLC. sent14: if the fact that the treadmill is noncellular thing that does tweak does not hold then the swatch does not spring-clean TLC. sent15: if something is a matricide it is sexual. sent16: the Father is dishonest. sent17: either something does not tweak or it is not dishonest or both if it is a kind of an amputation. sent18: the fact that the Father does not tweak or is honest or both is false if the treadmill does not tweak. sent19: if something is not dishonest then the fact that it is noncellular and it does tweak is not correct. sent20: that the treadmill does not tweak is correct if the swatch is an amputation and it is not non-dermatologic. sent21: if the treadmill does not tweak then the Father is dishonest. sent22: the parishioner dances parishioner and it is saprophytic if it is not an amputation. sent23: the swatch is noncellular. sent24: something is noncellular if it is sexual. sent25: if the swatch is a matricide then the Father is a kind of a matricide. sent26: if the parishioner does not spring-clean TLC then the treadmill does spring-clean TLC.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the swatch is not an amputation.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the swatch is a gitano and it is a prang is false.; sent3 -> int2: the swatch is dermatologic.;
the parishioner dances parishioner and is saprophytic.
sent19 -> int3: that the treadmill is noncellular thing that tweaks is wrong if it is honest.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Father does not tweak or it is not dishonest or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is sciatic but it is not developmental is wrong then it is not sciatic. sent2: that the treadmill is a one-upmanship and it is a gitano is right. sent3: the swatch is dermatologic thing that is noncellular. sent4: if something does not spring-clean apophatism then the fact that the parishioner is both sciatic and not developmental is false. sent5: there exists something such that that it is not cementitious and it does spring-clean apophatism does not hold. sent6: the treadmill does not spring-clean apophatism if there is something such that the fact that it is not cementitious and it does spring-clean apophatism is not correct. sent7: if the swatch is not a gitano the parishioner does not spring-clean TLC. sent8: if the parishioner is not sciatic the swatch is not sciatic. sent9: The TLC spring-cleans parishioner. sent10: either something is a matricide or it does wallop or both if it is not sciatic. sent11: that the swatch is a gitano and a prang is false if it is not an amputation. sent12: if the fact that something is dermatologic and does not spring-clean TLC does not hold then it is an amputation. sent13: the parishioner spring-cleans TLC. sent14: if the fact that the treadmill is noncellular thing that does tweak does not hold then the swatch does not spring-clean TLC. sent15: if something is a matricide it is sexual. sent16: the Father is dishonest. sent17: either something does not tweak or it is not dishonest or both if it is a kind of an amputation. sent18: the fact that the Father does not tweak or is honest or both is false if the treadmill does not tweak. sent19: if something is not dishonest then the fact that it is noncellular and it does tweak is not correct. sent20: that the treadmill does not tweak is correct if the swatch is an amputation and it is not non-dermatologic. sent21: if the treadmill does not tweak then the Father is dishonest. sent22: the parishioner dances parishioner and it is saprophytic if it is not an amputation. sent23: the swatch is noncellular. sent24: something is noncellular if it is sexual. sent25: if the swatch is a matricide then the Father is a kind of a matricide. sent26: if the parishioner does not spring-clean TLC then the treadmill does spring-clean TLC. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the swatch is not an amputation.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the swatch is a gitano and it is a prang is false.; sent3 -> int2: the swatch is dermatologic.; __UNKNOWN__