that the kraal is not a kind of a photopigment is true.
sent1: if the sodium does haze knight-errant and/or it is a kind of a analogist then the fact that the kraal is a proration is incorrect. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a analogist that the sodium is wearable thing that does not flake is not true. sent3: if the sodium does not flake then the kraal is not a photopigment. sent4: the owlet solemnizes clinch. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not haze knight-errant the kraal is not a analogist. sent6: the pantheist does not haze knight-errant. sent7: the sodium does not round. sent8: the sodium is not a Kurux but it is unwearable if there exists something such that it does not flake. sent9: the efflorescence is a proration. sent10: the spectrogram does not haze knight-errant or is a kind of a Kurux or both if there is something such that that it is not a analogist is right. sent11: if something is a Kurux that the souffle is not a kind of a Kurux but it is a photopigment is not true. sent12: something does not flake. sent13: if the fact that something is not a Kurux and is a photopigment does not hold it is not a photopigment. sent14: the sodium is a analogist if it is not a Kurux and is unwearable. sent15: that the pantheist does flake and is unwearable is not right if there is something such that it is a kind of a Kurux. sent16: the omentum is not a kind of a Kurux. sent17: that the kraal is not a proration and it is not a kind of a photopigment does not hold. sent18: the sodium is not a proration if there exists something such that it does not haze knight-errant. sent19: if the owlet is not a proration and is a analogist then the mortar is not a kind of a analogist. sent20: if there exists something such that it does not haze knight-errant and/or is a Kurux then the production is a Kurux. sent21: something is not a proration and is a analogist if it solemnizes clinch.
sent12 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the sodium is not a Kurux but it is unwearable is not incorrect.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the sodium is a analogist.; int2 -> int3: the sodium does haze knight-errant or it is a kind of a analogist or both.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the kraal is not a kind of a proration.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kraal is not a photopigment.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the kraal is not a kind of a proration and it is not a photopigment.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the kraal is not a photopigment.
sent21 -> int7: the owlet is not a proration and is a analogist if it does solemnize clinch.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the owlet is not a kind of a proration and is a analogist.; sent19 & int8 -> int9: the mortar is not a analogist.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a analogist.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the spectrogram does not haze knight-errant and/or it is a kind of a Kurux.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that either it does not haze knight-errant or it is a Kurux or both.; int12 & sent20 -> int13: the production is a Kurux.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is a Kurux.; int14 & sent15 -> int15: the fact that the pantheist flakes and is unwearable is incorrect.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it flakes and is unwearable is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the kraal is not a kind of a photopigment is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sodium does haze knight-errant and/or it is a kind of a analogist then the fact that the kraal is a proration is incorrect. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a analogist that the sodium is wearable thing that does not flake is not true. sent3: if the sodium does not flake then the kraal is not a photopigment. sent4: the owlet solemnizes clinch. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not haze knight-errant the kraal is not a analogist. sent6: the pantheist does not haze knight-errant. sent7: the sodium does not round. sent8: the sodium is not a Kurux but it is unwearable if there exists something such that it does not flake. sent9: the efflorescence is a proration. sent10: the spectrogram does not haze knight-errant or is a kind of a Kurux or both if there is something such that that it is not a analogist is right. sent11: if something is a Kurux that the souffle is not a kind of a Kurux but it is a photopigment is not true. sent12: something does not flake. sent13: if the fact that something is not a Kurux and is a photopigment does not hold it is not a photopigment. sent14: the sodium is a analogist if it is not a Kurux and is unwearable. sent15: that the pantheist does flake and is unwearable is not right if there is something such that it is a kind of a Kurux. sent16: the omentum is not a kind of a Kurux. sent17: that the kraal is not a proration and it is not a kind of a photopigment does not hold. sent18: the sodium is not a proration if there exists something such that it does not haze knight-errant. sent19: if the owlet is not a proration and is a analogist then the mortar is not a kind of a analogist. sent20: if there exists something such that it does not haze knight-errant and/or is a Kurux then the production is a Kurux. sent21: something is not a proration and is a analogist if it solemnizes clinch. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the sodium is not a Kurux but it is unwearable is not incorrect.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the sodium is a analogist.; int2 -> int3: the sodium does haze knight-errant or it is a kind of a analogist or both.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the kraal is not a kind of a proration.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kraal is not a photopigment.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the kraal is not a kind of a proration and it is not a photopigment.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__