the niacin specifies Sus but it does not service folderal.
sent1: that the parsnip is not apostrophic hold if there is something such that it does not specify Sus and/or it is not apostrophic. sent2: the isoagglutinin is not a presbyter if the nucleotide is a kind of a presbyter and is not a kind of a digestive. sent3: the recliner is not Newtonian. sent4: the fact that something fractures SEC and is not sensible is false if it is not apostrophic. sent5: the niacin does not service folderal. sent6: the niacin is apostrophic if it does fracture SEC. sent7: if the recliner is not a kind of a Newtonian then either the by-catch is a aeroembolism or it is monoclinic or both. sent8: everything does not specify Sus or it is not apostrophic or both. sent9: if the sporophore does fracture SEC but it does not reface isoagglutinin then the niacin reface isoagglutinin. sent10: if something is a kind of a buddleia then the nucleotide is a presbyter but it is not a digestive. sent11: something is not apostrophic but it services swivet if it does not service perithelium. sent12: the niacin services swivet if it is apostrophic. sent13: if the scalper is a kind of a Muslim it is a kind of a Tampere. sent14: the secretion is a Webb if the dripstone is a Webb. sent15: if something is sensible then it does fracture SEC. sent16: The fact that the swivet does not service niacin is correct. sent17: if the niacin does not reface isoagglutinin and does service tuberculin it is sensible. sent18: something is a buddleia if it is a aeroembolism. sent19: if there exists something such that it is not a presbyter then the dripstone is a Webb and neuropsychiatric. sent20: something that is a kind of a Webb is not accusatorial and not a harvest-lice. sent21: The folderal does not service niacin. sent22: if the niacin refaces isoagglutinin the Jonathan refaces isoagglutinin. sent23: if there is something such that that it does fracture SEC and is not sensible is not true then the sporophore does not fracture SEC. sent24: the niacin specifies Monitor. sent25: if the secretion is not accusatorial and it is not a harvest-lice then the parsnip does not service perithelium. sent26: the fact that the niacin does reface isoagglutinin and services tuberculin is not right. sent27: something is a buddleia if that it is monoclinic is true. sent28: the fact that the niacin does not service swivet is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the niacin does not reface isoagglutinin but it services tuberculin.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the niacin is sensible.; sent15 -> int2: the niacin fractures SEC if it is sensible.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the niacin does fracture SEC.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the niacin is apostrophic.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the niacin does service swivet.; int5 & sent28 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the niacin does not reface isoagglutinin but it services tuberculin is not correct.;
the fact that the niacin specifies Sus and does not service folderal does not hold.
sent4 -> int8: that the parsnip fractures SEC but it is not sensible is incorrect if it is not apostrophic.; sent11 -> int9: if that the parsnip does not service perithelium is correct then it is not apostrophic and it does service swivet.; sent20 -> int10: the secretion is not accusatorial and not a harvest-lice if it is a Webb.; sent7 & sent3 -> int11: either the by-catch is a aeroembolism or it is monoclinic or both.; sent18 -> int12: if the by-catch is a aeroembolism then it is a kind of a buddleia.; sent27 -> int13: the by-catch is a buddleia if it is monoclinic.; int11 & int12 & int13 -> int14: the by-catch is a buddleia.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it is a buddleia.; int15 & sent10 -> int16: the nucleotide is a presbyter and is not a kind of a digestive.; sent2 & int16 -> int17: the isoagglutinin is not a presbyter.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is not a kind of a presbyter.; int18 & sent19 -> int19: the dripstone is both a Webb and neuropsychiatric.; int19 -> int20: the dripstone is a Webb.; sent14 & int20 -> int21: the secretion is a Webb.; int10 & int21 -> int22: the secretion is not accusatorial and is not a harvest-lice.; sent25 & int22 -> int23: that the parsnip does not service perithelium is not false.; int9 & int23 -> int24: the parsnip is not apostrophic but it services swivet.; int24 -> int25: the fact that the parsnip is not apostrophic is not false.; int8 & int25 -> int26: that the parsnip fractures SEC and is insensible is false.; int26 -> int27: there is something such that the fact that it fractures SEC and is not sensible does not hold.; int27 & sent23 -> int28: the sporophore does not fracture SEC.; int28 -> int29: something does not fracture SEC.;
$hypothesis$ = the niacin specifies Sus but it does not service folderal. ; $context$ = sent1: that the parsnip is not apostrophic hold if there is something such that it does not specify Sus and/or it is not apostrophic. sent2: the isoagglutinin is not a presbyter if the nucleotide is a kind of a presbyter and is not a kind of a digestive. sent3: the recliner is not Newtonian. sent4: the fact that something fractures SEC and is not sensible is false if it is not apostrophic. sent5: the niacin does not service folderal. sent6: the niacin is apostrophic if it does fracture SEC. sent7: if the recliner is not a kind of a Newtonian then either the by-catch is a aeroembolism or it is monoclinic or both. sent8: everything does not specify Sus or it is not apostrophic or both. sent9: if the sporophore does fracture SEC but it does not reface isoagglutinin then the niacin reface isoagglutinin. sent10: if something is a kind of a buddleia then the nucleotide is a presbyter but it is not a digestive. sent11: something is not apostrophic but it services swivet if it does not service perithelium. sent12: the niacin services swivet if it is apostrophic. sent13: if the scalper is a kind of a Muslim it is a kind of a Tampere. sent14: the secretion is a Webb if the dripstone is a Webb. sent15: if something is sensible then it does fracture SEC. sent16: The fact that the swivet does not service niacin is correct. sent17: if the niacin does not reface isoagglutinin and does service tuberculin it is sensible. sent18: something is a buddleia if it is a aeroembolism. sent19: if there exists something such that it is not a presbyter then the dripstone is a Webb and neuropsychiatric. sent20: something that is a kind of a Webb is not accusatorial and not a harvest-lice. sent21: The folderal does not service niacin. sent22: if the niacin refaces isoagglutinin the Jonathan refaces isoagglutinin. sent23: if there is something such that that it does fracture SEC and is not sensible is not true then the sporophore does not fracture SEC. sent24: the niacin specifies Monitor. sent25: if the secretion is not accusatorial and it is not a harvest-lice then the parsnip does not service perithelium. sent26: the fact that the niacin does reface isoagglutinin and services tuberculin is not right. sent27: something is a buddleia if that it is monoclinic is true. sent28: the fact that the niacin does not service swivet is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the niacin does not reface isoagglutinin but it services tuberculin.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the niacin is sensible.; sent15 -> int2: the niacin fractures SEC if it is sensible.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the niacin does fracture SEC.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the niacin is apostrophic.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the niacin does service swivet.; int5 & sent28 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the niacin does not reface isoagglutinin but it services tuberculin is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__