the fact that there exists something such that if it is a lick then it is not ready-made and not filial is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is atrial it is echoic thing that is not a lilt. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a lick it is both non-ready-made and not non-filial. sent3: the hire is not a ready-made and is non-filial if it is a lick. sent4: there exists something such that if it is astrological then it does not knell and does not treble activation. sent5: the fact that the hire is ready-made but it is not filial is not false if it is a kind of a lick. sent6: something that is aeromechanic is not a decile and not a lilt. sent7: the hire is not filial if it is a kind of a lick. sent8: the frangipane is not a kind of a lick and it is not a kind of a Americanization if it follows. sent9: the hire is not biographic and it is not a kind of a courthouse if it screams Prairial. sent10: there is something such that if it is a lick it is a ready-made and is not filial. sent11: there is something such that if it is commemorative then it does not treble plastic and is a pig. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Hinduism then it does not thirst cooter and it is not neuromuscular. sent13: there exists something such that if it licks it is not filial. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a lick it is non-ready-made. sent15: something does not hitch litter and is not a patriotism if the fact that it discovers is not incorrect. sent16: if that the parsnip hitches discretion hold then it is a kind of non-ready-made thing that is not a photograph. sent17: the fact that there is something such that if it does gleam it is non-molecular thing that is not a Honduran hold. sent18: something does not treble Southey and it is not a kind of a substantive if it hitches idiolect.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is aeromechanic it is not a decile and it does not lilt.
sent6 -> int1: if the eccentric is aeromechanic then it is both not a decile and not a lilt.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a lick then it is not ready-made and not filial is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is atrial it is echoic thing that is not a lilt. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a lick it is both non-ready-made and not non-filial. sent3: the hire is not a ready-made and is non-filial if it is a lick. sent4: there exists something such that if it is astrological then it does not knell and does not treble activation. sent5: the fact that the hire is ready-made but it is not filial is not false if it is a kind of a lick. sent6: something that is aeromechanic is not a decile and not a lilt. sent7: the hire is not filial if it is a kind of a lick. sent8: the frangipane is not a kind of a lick and it is not a kind of a Americanization if it follows. sent9: the hire is not biographic and it is not a kind of a courthouse if it screams Prairial. sent10: there is something such that if it is a lick it is a ready-made and is not filial. sent11: there is something such that if it is commemorative then it does not treble plastic and is a pig. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Hinduism then it does not thirst cooter and it is not neuromuscular. sent13: there exists something such that if it licks it is not filial. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a lick it is non-ready-made. sent15: something does not hitch litter and is not a patriotism if the fact that it discovers is not incorrect. sent16: if that the parsnip hitches discretion hold then it is a kind of non-ready-made thing that is not a photograph. sent17: the fact that there is something such that if it does gleam it is non-molecular thing that is not a Honduran hold. sent18: something does not treble Southey and it is not a kind of a substantive if it hitches idiolect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__