either the subarcticness or the harrying thallium or both occurs.
sent1: if the harrying Asplenium does not occur then that the harrying summarization and the monomorphemicness occurs is not correct. sent2: the indelicacy does not occur if the fact that the bedewing Recurvirostridae but not the excoriation occurs is wrong. sent3: that the compaction does not occur hold. sent4: the liberation does not occur if the fact that the harrying summarization and the non-monomorphemicness happens is not true. sent5: if that the harrying verbiage does not occur hold both the extrasensoriness and the Hebraicness happens. sent6: the ceilidh does not occur if the encrusting picnicker does not occur and the monomorphemicness does not occur. sent7: that the encrusting picnicker does not occur triggers that the dispensableness occurs but the harrying Asplenium does not occur. sent8: the polynomial happens if the leptosporangiateness does not occur. sent9: the liberation is brought about by the pudendalness. sent10: the pudendalness and the eremiticness happens if the archidiaconalness does not occur. sent11: if the encrusting infuriation occurs then the subarcticness occurs. sent12: the fact that the Chianness does not occur hold. sent13: if that the sleepwalking but not the polynomial occurs does not hold then the let does not occur. sent14: the archidiaconalness does not occur and the bedewing timidity does not occur. sent15: the fact that the eremiticness happens is not incorrect. sent16: that the coolingness happens but the bedewing throat does not occur is not true. sent17: the midterm does not occur if the fact that the bedewing Roanoke but not the wilt occurs is wrong. sent18: the rhizoidalness does not occur. sent19: the fact that the papillariness does not occur and the subarcticness occurs is incorrect if the harrying thallium does not occur. sent20: the intervening does not occur and the harrying Maraco does not occur. sent21: the fictionalization occurs and the Bam happens. sent22: the encrusting infuriation and/or the non-papillaryness happens if the encrusting picnicker happens. sent23: the non-papillariness leads to that the subarcticness occurs. sent24: the bottle does not occur. sent25: if that the appealing does not occur is not wrong the bedewing Roanoke happens. sent26: that the harrying summarization and the monomorphemicness happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the encrusting picnicker does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the dispensableness occurs and the harrying Asplenium does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the harrying Asplenium does not occur.; sent14 -> int3: the archidiaconalness does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the pudendalness and the eremiticness happens.; int4 -> int5: the pudendalness happens.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the liberation occurs.;
the ceilidh does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = either the subarcticness or the harrying thallium or both occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the harrying Asplenium does not occur then that the harrying summarization and the monomorphemicness occurs is not correct. sent2: the indelicacy does not occur if the fact that the bedewing Recurvirostridae but not the excoriation occurs is wrong. sent3: that the compaction does not occur hold. sent4: the liberation does not occur if the fact that the harrying summarization and the non-monomorphemicness happens is not true. sent5: if that the harrying verbiage does not occur hold both the extrasensoriness and the Hebraicness happens. sent6: the ceilidh does not occur if the encrusting picnicker does not occur and the monomorphemicness does not occur. sent7: that the encrusting picnicker does not occur triggers that the dispensableness occurs but the harrying Asplenium does not occur. sent8: the polynomial happens if the leptosporangiateness does not occur. sent9: the liberation is brought about by the pudendalness. sent10: the pudendalness and the eremiticness happens if the archidiaconalness does not occur. sent11: if the encrusting infuriation occurs then the subarcticness occurs. sent12: the fact that the Chianness does not occur hold. sent13: if that the sleepwalking but not the polynomial occurs does not hold then the let does not occur. sent14: the archidiaconalness does not occur and the bedewing timidity does not occur. sent15: the fact that the eremiticness happens is not incorrect. sent16: that the coolingness happens but the bedewing throat does not occur is not true. sent17: the midterm does not occur if the fact that the bedewing Roanoke but not the wilt occurs is wrong. sent18: the rhizoidalness does not occur. sent19: the fact that the papillariness does not occur and the subarcticness occurs is incorrect if the harrying thallium does not occur. sent20: the intervening does not occur and the harrying Maraco does not occur. sent21: the fictionalization occurs and the Bam happens. sent22: the encrusting infuriation and/or the non-papillaryness happens if the encrusting picnicker happens. sent23: the non-papillariness leads to that the subarcticness occurs. sent24: the bottle does not occur. sent25: if that the appealing does not occur is not wrong the bedewing Roanoke happens. sent26: that the harrying summarization and the monomorphemicness happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the encrusting picnicker does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the dispensableness occurs and the harrying Asplenium does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the harrying Asplenium does not occur.; sent14 -> int3: the archidiaconalness does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the pudendalness and the eremiticness happens.; int4 -> int5: the pudendalness happens.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the liberation occurs.; __UNKNOWN__