the fact that there is something such that the fact that it does not welcome or it is neuropsychological or both is not correct is incorrect.
sent1: everything is not a kind of a S. sent2: something does not redden domicile if it does not crucify Italian and it is not a S. sent3: there is something such that it welcomes. sent4: the iron is not neuropsychological if the tricot is neuropsychological. sent5: there is something such that it is not welcome and/or it is neuropsychological. sent6: the fact that the iron does not get palsied or it is neuropsychological or both is wrong. sent7: the iron is not neuropsychological. sent8: everything does not crucify Italian. sent9: if something is not unstatesmanlike that it is not a welcome and not neuropsychological does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that that it does welcome and/or is neuropsychological is not right. sent11: something is not neuropsychological. sent12: the tricot is a friendly if the fact that the Italian does not get iron and gets palsied is incorrect. sent13: the iron gets palsied. sent14: that the Italian does not get iron and gets palsied does not hold. sent15: if the tricot is neuropsychological that either the iron is not welcome or it is neuropsychological or both is not right. sent16: the fact that the tricot does not redden Italian and/or it is homiletics does not hold. sent17: something does get palsied if it gets iron. sent18: the tricot is a friendly if the Italian does get iron. sent19: the machinery is a friendly if the fact that the Italian is both not a welcome and not neuropsychological is not true. sent20: that the fact that the Italian gets iron and does get palsied is incorrect is right. sent21: something is neuropsychological if that it is not unfriendly hold. sent22: the fact that the iron is neuropsychological is right if it is a kind of a disqualification. sent23: that the Italian does not get palsied and is a kind of a friendly is incorrect.
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the tricot is a kind of a friendly.; sent21 -> int2: the tricot is neuropsychological if it is a friendly.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tricot is neuropsychological.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: that the iron is not a welcome or neuropsychological or both is not true.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the machinery is a friendly.
sent9 -> int5: if the tricot is statesmanlike then the fact that that it is not welcome and is not neuropsychological is not false does not hold.; sent1 -> int6: the tricot is not a S.; sent8 -> int7: the tricot does not crucify Italian.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the tricot does not crucify Italian and is not a S.; sent2 -> int9: if the tricot does not crucify Italian and it is not a S that it does redden domicile does not hold.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the tricot does not redden domicile.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that the fact that it does not welcome or it is neuropsychological or both is not correct is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is not a kind of a S. sent2: something does not redden domicile if it does not crucify Italian and it is not a S. sent3: there is something such that it welcomes. sent4: the iron is not neuropsychological if the tricot is neuropsychological. sent5: there is something such that it is not welcome and/or it is neuropsychological. sent6: the fact that the iron does not get palsied or it is neuropsychological or both is wrong. sent7: the iron is not neuropsychological. sent8: everything does not crucify Italian. sent9: if something is not unstatesmanlike that it is not a welcome and not neuropsychological does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that that it does welcome and/or is neuropsychological is not right. sent11: something is not neuropsychological. sent12: the tricot is a friendly if the fact that the Italian does not get iron and gets palsied is incorrect. sent13: the iron gets palsied. sent14: that the Italian does not get iron and gets palsied does not hold. sent15: if the tricot is neuropsychological that either the iron is not welcome or it is neuropsychological or both is not right. sent16: the fact that the tricot does not redden Italian and/or it is homiletics does not hold. sent17: something does get palsied if it gets iron. sent18: the tricot is a friendly if the Italian does get iron. sent19: the machinery is a friendly if the fact that the Italian is both not a welcome and not neuropsychological is not true. sent20: that the fact that the Italian gets iron and does get palsied is incorrect is right. sent21: something is neuropsychological if that it is not unfriendly hold. sent22: the fact that the iron is neuropsychological is right if it is a kind of a disqualification. sent23: that the Italian does not get palsied and is a kind of a friendly is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the tricot is a kind of a friendly.; sent21 -> int2: the tricot is neuropsychological if it is a friendly.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tricot is neuropsychological.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: that the iron is not a welcome or neuropsychological or both is not true.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__