the photojournalist is not faceless.
sent1: the fact that the photojournalist does not melanize disobedience and it is not an antitoxin is not true if the condom is not inelegant. sent2: that the fraction does not answer copyist and melanizes disobedience is not right. sent3: if something is not a sorority then it is both faceless and Bantoid. sent4: that the corral is angiocarpic but it is not a sorority is incorrect if the fraction is not a sorority. sent5: if the fact that the corral is angiocarpic but it is not a sorority is incorrect it is non-Bantoid. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not angiocarpic is true then the photojournalist is not a sorority. sent7: if something is not an antitoxin it is inelegant or is seedless or both. sent8: the condom is not inelegant if there is something such that it is not Bantoid and it is seedless. sent9: something does not melanize disobedience. sent10: something is non-angiocarpic if it is inelegant. sent11: if that the photojournalist does not melanize disobedience and is not an antitoxin does not hold it is not faceless. sent12: the corral is seedless. sent13: if the fraction is a kind of a marlin or does answer copyist or both it is not a sorority. sent14: everything is not a kind of an antitoxin.
the photojournalist is faceless.
sent3 -> int1: the photojournalist is faceless and Bantoid if it is not a sorority.; sent10 -> int2: if the fraction is inelegant then it is not angiocarpic.; sent7 -> int3: either the corral is not elegant or it is seedless or both if it is not an antitoxin.; sent14 -> int4: the corral is not an antitoxin.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the corral is inelegant or is seedless or both.; int5 -> int6: everything is inelegant or seedless or both.; int6 -> int7: the fraction is inelegant and/or is seedless.;
$hypothesis$ = the photojournalist is not faceless. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the photojournalist does not melanize disobedience and it is not an antitoxin is not true if the condom is not inelegant. sent2: that the fraction does not answer copyist and melanizes disobedience is not right. sent3: if something is not a sorority then it is both faceless and Bantoid. sent4: that the corral is angiocarpic but it is not a sorority is incorrect if the fraction is not a sorority. sent5: if the fact that the corral is angiocarpic but it is not a sorority is incorrect it is non-Bantoid. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not angiocarpic is true then the photojournalist is not a sorority. sent7: if something is not an antitoxin it is inelegant or is seedless or both. sent8: the condom is not inelegant if there is something such that it is not Bantoid and it is seedless. sent9: something does not melanize disobedience. sent10: something is non-angiocarpic if it is inelegant. sent11: if that the photojournalist does not melanize disobedience and is not an antitoxin does not hold it is not faceless. sent12: the corral is seedless. sent13: if the fraction is a kind of a marlin or does answer copyist or both it is not a sorority. sent14: everything is not a kind of an antitoxin. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__