that the entrusting HDTV does not occur if the parturientness occurs does not hold.
sent1: if the altostratus does not occur then the smacker does not occur and the anastigmaticness does not occur. sent2: that the pecticness happens results in that the gravy does not occur and the orbing excursion does not occur. sent3: not the orbing demur but the excursion happens if that the gravy does not occur is right. sent4: that either the curettage or that the banditry occurs or both hold causes that the interrogation does not occur. sent5: the non-anastigmaticness yields that the contralateralness happens and the pecticness occurs. sent6: that the parturientness happens is prevented by that the ethnographicness and/or the entrusting HDTV occurs. sent7: if the ethnographicness occurs the fact that the adiabaticness happens is not incorrect. sent8: if the ethnographicness happens then the parturientness does not occur. sent9: if the parturientness does not occur the ethnographicness happens. sent10: the conjunction does not occur but the rowing happens if the orbing demur does not occur. sent11: that the rowing happens causes that either the parturientness does not occur or the entrusting HDTV does not occur or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the entrusting HDTV happens.; assump1 -> int1: the ethnographicness and/or the entrusting HDTV occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the parturientness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the parturientness happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the entrusting HDTV does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the adiabaticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the entrusting HDTV does not occur if the parturientness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the altostratus does not occur then the smacker does not occur and the anastigmaticness does not occur. sent2: that the pecticness happens results in that the gravy does not occur and the orbing excursion does not occur. sent3: not the orbing demur but the excursion happens if that the gravy does not occur is right. sent4: that either the curettage or that the banditry occurs or both hold causes that the interrogation does not occur. sent5: the non-anastigmaticness yields that the contralateralness happens and the pecticness occurs. sent6: that the parturientness happens is prevented by that the ethnographicness and/or the entrusting HDTV occurs. sent7: if the ethnographicness occurs the fact that the adiabaticness happens is not incorrect. sent8: if the ethnographicness happens then the parturientness does not occur. sent9: if the parturientness does not occur the ethnographicness happens. sent10: the conjunction does not occur but the rowing happens if the orbing demur does not occur. sent11: that the rowing happens causes that either the parturientness does not occur or the entrusting HDTV does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the entrusting HDTV happens.; assump1 -> int1: the ethnographicness and/or the entrusting HDTV occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the parturientness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the parturientness happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the entrusting HDTV does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__