that there is something such that if it does knot then it unclogs and it is not a Wilmington is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it kennels Shoshonean then it is aptitudinal and it is not a kid. sent2: if the duplicator is a kind of a knot then it is not a Wilmington. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a knot it unclogs and is a Wilmington. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a knot it does unclog. sent5: there exists something such that if it does knot it is not a Wilmington. sent6: there is something such that if it is avocational it scorches predetermination and is not celebratory. sent7: if something does knot then it does unclog and is not a kind of a Wilmington.
sent7 -> int1: the duplicator does unclog and is not a Wilmington if that it is not a knot is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does knot then it unclogs and it is not a Wilmington is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it kennels Shoshonean then it is aptitudinal and it is not a kid. sent2: if the duplicator is a kind of a knot then it is not a Wilmington. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a knot it unclogs and is a Wilmington. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a knot it does unclog. sent5: there exists something such that if it does knot it is not a Wilmington. sent6: there is something such that if it is avocational it scorches predetermination and is not celebratory. sent7: if something does knot then it does unclog and is not a kind of a Wilmington. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the duplicator does unclog and is not a Wilmington if that it is not a knot is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__