the footbath conventionalizes reptile.
sent1: if the lyssavirus fears hadron and is not a dresser then it is not extrasensory. sent2: if the footbath is a dresser but it is not a MVP it does not conventionalize reptile. sent3: the cartouche is not ectodermal if the lyssavirus is not extrasensory and it does not fear malnutrition. sent4: the footbath does conventionalize reptile if the sandbank does conventionalize reptile. sent5: if the fact that something is not a walkabout and it is not ectodermal is incorrect then it does not fear malnutrition. sent6: the amberbell conventionalizes reptile if the sandbank is a lunatic but it does not conventionalizes reptile. sent7: something is not a lunatic. sent8: something is a kind of a lunatic but it does not conventionalize reptile if it is not a kind of a walkabout. sent9: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a lunatic then the fact that the fact that the sandbank is not a kind of a walkabout and it is not ectodermal is not wrong is not right. sent10: if the fact that something is not a MVP and it is not extrasensory is wrong the fact that it does not fear malnutrition is correct. sent11: the sandbank is not extrasensory. sent12: the chopine is a lunatic if the weigher is not a lunatic and/or it is a walkabout. sent13: the chopine is a kind of a MVP if the sandbank does not fear malnutrition and it is non-extrasensory. sent14: if that the chopine is a MVP is not wrong the footbath is a dresser and is not a MVP. sent15: the lyssavirus does fear hadron but it is not a kind of a dresser. sent16: if there exists something such that it is not a lunatic then the fact that the sandbank is not a kind of a walkabout but it is ectodermal is false.
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: that the fact that the sandbank is not a walkabout and is not ectodermal is not true is not false.; sent5 -> int2: if that the sandbank is not a walkabout and it is not ectodermal is wrong then it does not fear malnutrition.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sandbank does not fear malnutrition.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the sandbank does not fear malnutrition and it is not extrasensory hold.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the chopine is a MVP.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the footbath is a dresser but it is not a MVP.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the footbath conventionalizes reptile.
sent1 & sent15 -> int7: the lyssavirus is not extrasensory.;
$hypothesis$ = the footbath conventionalizes reptile. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lyssavirus fears hadron and is not a dresser then it is not extrasensory. sent2: if the footbath is a dresser but it is not a MVP it does not conventionalize reptile. sent3: the cartouche is not ectodermal if the lyssavirus is not extrasensory and it does not fear malnutrition. sent4: the footbath does conventionalize reptile if the sandbank does conventionalize reptile. sent5: if the fact that something is not a walkabout and it is not ectodermal is incorrect then it does not fear malnutrition. sent6: the amberbell conventionalizes reptile if the sandbank is a lunatic but it does not conventionalizes reptile. sent7: something is not a lunatic. sent8: something is a kind of a lunatic but it does not conventionalize reptile if it is not a kind of a walkabout. sent9: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a lunatic then the fact that the fact that the sandbank is not a kind of a walkabout and it is not ectodermal is not wrong is not right. sent10: if the fact that something is not a MVP and it is not extrasensory is wrong the fact that it does not fear malnutrition is correct. sent11: the sandbank is not extrasensory. sent12: the chopine is a lunatic if the weigher is not a lunatic and/or it is a walkabout. sent13: the chopine is a kind of a MVP if the sandbank does not fear malnutrition and it is non-extrasensory. sent14: if that the chopine is a MVP is not wrong the footbath is a dresser and is not a MVP. sent15: the lyssavirus does fear hadron but it is not a kind of a dresser. sent16: if there exists something such that it is not a lunatic then the fact that the sandbank is not a kind of a walkabout but it is ectodermal is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: that the fact that the sandbank is not a walkabout and is not ectodermal is not true is not false.; sent5 -> int2: if that the sandbank is not a walkabout and it is not ectodermal is wrong then it does not fear malnutrition.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sandbank does not fear malnutrition.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the sandbank does not fear malnutrition and it is not extrasensory hold.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the chopine is a MVP.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the footbath is a dresser but it is not a MVP.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__