that the prelude does not occur if the extracellularness happens is not right.
sent1: that the obligating happens triggers that the activation occurs. sent2: that the extracellularness happens results in the preluding. sent3: the monocotyledonousness does not occur. sent4: the biogeographicness does not occur. sent5: the fact that not the conception but the digitizing viper occurs is false. sent6: if the biogeographicness does not occur then the obligating and/or the whammy happens. sent7: the preluding happens. sent8: that not the conception but the digitizing viper happens is not right if the extracellularness occurs. sent9: that the prelude does not occur and the activation occurs is not true if the obligating does not occur. sent10: the fact that the fact that the conception does not occur and the digitizing viper does not occur is false if the extracellularness happens hold. sent11: the explicableness occurs if the fact that the conception does not occur and the digitizing viper does not occur does not hold. sent12: the prelude does not occur if the explicableness and the activation occurs. sent13: that the lobbing sweeping does not occur hold. sent14: that the digitizing viper occurs prevents the inexplicableness. sent15: that the vasotomy does not occur and the lobbing entoproct does not occur is not correct. sent16: the insolubleness happens and the indent occurs. sent17: the stickball occurs and the digitizing Pelham occurs. sent18: the digitizing scrapbook occurs. sent19: the dermatologicness and/or the mildness occurs. sent20: that the explicableness and the activation happens yields that the prelude happens. sent21: the activation happens if the whammy happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extracellularness happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the conception does not occur and the digitizing viper does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the explicableness occurs.; sent6 & sent4 -> int3: the obligatedness and/or the whammy happens.; int3 & sent1 & sent21 -> int4: the activation happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the explicableness occurs and the activation occurs.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the preluding does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the vitrectomy happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the prelude does not occur if the extracellularness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the obligating happens triggers that the activation occurs. sent2: that the extracellularness happens results in the preluding. sent3: the monocotyledonousness does not occur. sent4: the biogeographicness does not occur. sent5: the fact that not the conception but the digitizing viper occurs is false. sent6: if the biogeographicness does not occur then the obligating and/or the whammy happens. sent7: the preluding happens. sent8: that not the conception but the digitizing viper happens is not right if the extracellularness occurs. sent9: that the prelude does not occur and the activation occurs is not true if the obligating does not occur. sent10: the fact that the fact that the conception does not occur and the digitizing viper does not occur is false if the extracellularness happens hold. sent11: the explicableness occurs if the fact that the conception does not occur and the digitizing viper does not occur does not hold. sent12: the prelude does not occur if the explicableness and the activation occurs. sent13: that the lobbing sweeping does not occur hold. sent14: that the digitizing viper occurs prevents the inexplicableness. sent15: that the vasotomy does not occur and the lobbing entoproct does not occur is not correct. sent16: the insolubleness happens and the indent occurs. sent17: the stickball occurs and the digitizing Pelham occurs. sent18: the digitizing scrapbook occurs. sent19: the dermatologicness and/or the mildness occurs. sent20: that the explicableness and the activation happens yields that the prelude happens. sent21: the activation happens if the whammy happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extracellularness happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the conception does not occur and the digitizing viper does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the explicableness occurs.; sent6 & sent4 -> int3: the obligatedness and/or the whammy happens.; int3 & sent1 & sent21 -> int4: the activation happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the explicableness occurs and the activation occurs.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the preluding does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__