the stander impacts inamorato.
sent1: something is not a poison and is not autogamous if it is not inclement. sent2: the wally does not activate Ra or is not immodest or both if something is not immodest. sent3: the stander does impact inamorato if the fact that it is inclement thing that is not autogamous is not right. sent4: the fact that the stander impacts inamorato is true if it is not inclement. sent5: if the stander does activate Ra and is inclement it is not autogamous. sent6: that something is a kind of an airing and/or is not a kind of a aquatics is incorrect if it is not a neuropil. sent7: if something does not activate Ra and is not immodest the bullfrog is autogamous. sent8: the wally is not autogamous if it is both a poison and not non-immodest. sent9: if the stander is inclement it is conspicuous. sent10: The Ra activates wally. sent11: that the stander does not impact inamorato if the wally does not activate Ra is right. sent12: the freeze is immodest. sent13: everything is a kind of a hyson and it is inclement. sent14: something that excuses Maidu is lung-like. sent15: if the inamorato is lung-like then the choragus is not a contester but it is not ostentatious. sent16: that the stander is inclement but it is not autogamous is false if the wally is not autogamous. sent17: the inamorato excuses Maidu and is a neuropteron. sent18: the wally activates Ra. sent19: if the wally activates Ra then it is immodest. sent20: if there exists something such that it is not a poison and is not autogamous then that the Punjabi is not immodest is right. sent21: if the choragus is not a contester but it is unostentatious then the icecap is not a kind of a neuropil. sent22: the wally is a poison.
sent19 & sent18 -> int1: the wally is immodest.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: that the wally poisons and it is not non-immodest is true.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the wally is non-autogamous.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: that the stander is inclement but it is not autogamous is wrong.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the bullfrog is autogamous and it is a hyson.
sent13 -> int5: the wally is a hyson and is inclement.; int5 -> int6: the wally is a kind of a hyson.; int6 -> int7: everything is a kind of a hyson.; int7 -> int8: the bullfrog is a hyson.;
$hypothesis$ = the stander impacts inamorato. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a poison and is not autogamous if it is not inclement. sent2: the wally does not activate Ra or is not immodest or both if something is not immodest. sent3: the stander does impact inamorato if the fact that it is inclement thing that is not autogamous is not right. sent4: the fact that the stander impacts inamorato is true if it is not inclement. sent5: if the stander does activate Ra and is inclement it is not autogamous. sent6: that something is a kind of an airing and/or is not a kind of a aquatics is incorrect if it is not a neuropil. sent7: if something does not activate Ra and is not immodest the bullfrog is autogamous. sent8: the wally is not autogamous if it is both a poison and not non-immodest. sent9: if the stander is inclement it is conspicuous. sent10: The Ra activates wally. sent11: that the stander does not impact inamorato if the wally does not activate Ra is right. sent12: the freeze is immodest. sent13: everything is a kind of a hyson and it is inclement. sent14: something that excuses Maidu is lung-like. sent15: if the inamorato is lung-like then the choragus is not a contester but it is not ostentatious. sent16: that the stander is inclement but it is not autogamous is false if the wally is not autogamous. sent17: the inamorato excuses Maidu and is a neuropteron. sent18: the wally activates Ra. sent19: if the wally activates Ra then it is immodest. sent20: if there exists something such that it is not a poison and is not autogamous then that the Punjabi is not immodest is right. sent21: if the choragus is not a contester but it is unostentatious then the icecap is not a kind of a neuropil. sent22: the wally is a poison. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent18 -> int1: the wally is immodest.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: that the wally poisons and it is not non-immodest is true.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the wally is non-autogamous.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: that the stander is inclement but it is not autogamous is wrong.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__