that if the geysering bond does not occur then the repose does not occur and the spritzing does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the indiscriminateness does not occur. sent2: if the geysering bond does not occur and the geysering brew does not occur then the discriminatoriness does not occur. sent3: the Mycenaeanness occurs. sent4: that the geysering bond does not occur but the geysering brew happens does not hold. sent5: the spritzing does not occur if the geysering standby does not occur. sent6: if that that the accounting does not occur but the Mycenaeanness occurs is not correct is true then the Mycenaeanness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the geysering standby does not occur is not wrong if the geysering brew does not occur. sent8: that the reposing does not occur is brought about by either that the Mycenaeanness happens or the sass or both.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the geysering bond does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the geysering brew occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the geysering bond does not occur but the geysering brew happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the geysering brew does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the geysering standby does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the spritz does not occur.; sent3 -> int6: the Mycenaeanness occurs and/or the sass happens.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: that the reposing does not occur is not incorrect.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the reposing does not occur and the spritz does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the discriminatoriness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that if the geysering bond does not occur then the repose does not occur and the spritzing does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the indiscriminateness does not occur. sent2: if the geysering bond does not occur and the geysering brew does not occur then the discriminatoriness does not occur. sent3: the Mycenaeanness occurs. sent4: that the geysering bond does not occur but the geysering brew happens does not hold. sent5: the spritzing does not occur if the geysering standby does not occur. sent6: if that that the accounting does not occur but the Mycenaeanness occurs is not correct is true then the Mycenaeanness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the geysering standby does not occur is not wrong if the geysering brew does not occur. sent8: that the reposing does not occur is brought about by either that the Mycenaeanness happens or the sass or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the geysering bond does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the geysering brew occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the geysering bond does not occur but the geysering brew happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the geysering brew does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the geysering standby does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the spritz does not occur.; sent3 -> int6: the Mycenaeanness occurs and/or the sass happens.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: that the reposing does not occur is not incorrect.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the reposing does not occur and the spritz does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__