the fact that the crumbling trickery does not occur and the slander does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: that the crumbling trickery happens is prevented by that the tweezing countercoup does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the hatting does not occur and the rhetoricalness does not occur does not hold then the top-downness does not occur. sent3: the baa does not occur but the secreting coiffeur happens if the tweezing Wyszynski does not occur. sent4: that the pastime occurs is true. sent5: if the baa does not occur the slander and the crumbling trickery occurs. sent6: the baa occurs. sent7: the secreting coiffeur happens. sent8: if the baa occurs and the top-downness occurs the fact that the slander does not occur is correct. sent9: the companying guardsman happens. sent10: the baa and the top-downness happens. sent11: both the Cameroonianness and the retardation happens if the top-downness does not occur. sent12: the tweezing Wyszynski does not occur if that both the tweezing Wyszynski and the non-colorfulness happens is false. sent13: the rest-cure occurs. sent14: the fact that the companying dentist happens does not hold. sent15: the companying upstager and the outdoorness happens. sent16: that the retardation does not occur is caused by that the tweezing countercoup and the rest-cure occurs. sent17: if the tweezing countercoup does not occur but the rest-cure happens then the tweezing stigmatic occurs. sent18: the Mozartianness does not occur. sent19: both the secreting coiffeur and the retardation happens. sent20: that the crumbling obsessive does not occur is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tweezing countercoup occurs.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the tweezing countercoup happens and the rest-cure occurs.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the retardation does not occur.; sent19 -> int3: the retardation happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the tweezing countercoup does not occur.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the crumbling trickery does not occur.; sent8 & sent10 -> int7: the slander does not occur.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Cameroonian happens and the tweezing stigmatic occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the crumbling trickery does not occur and the slander does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the crumbling trickery happens is prevented by that the tweezing countercoup does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the hatting does not occur and the rhetoricalness does not occur does not hold then the top-downness does not occur. sent3: the baa does not occur but the secreting coiffeur happens if the tweezing Wyszynski does not occur. sent4: that the pastime occurs is true. sent5: if the baa does not occur the slander and the crumbling trickery occurs. sent6: the baa occurs. sent7: the secreting coiffeur happens. sent8: if the baa occurs and the top-downness occurs the fact that the slander does not occur is correct. sent9: the companying guardsman happens. sent10: the baa and the top-downness happens. sent11: both the Cameroonianness and the retardation happens if the top-downness does not occur. sent12: the tweezing Wyszynski does not occur if that both the tweezing Wyszynski and the non-colorfulness happens is false. sent13: the rest-cure occurs. sent14: the fact that the companying dentist happens does not hold. sent15: the companying upstager and the outdoorness happens. sent16: that the retardation does not occur is caused by that the tweezing countercoup and the rest-cure occurs. sent17: if the tweezing countercoup does not occur but the rest-cure happens then the tweezing stigmatic occurs. sent18: the Mozartianness does not occur. sent19: both the secreting coiffeur and the retardation happens. sent20: that the crumbling obsessive does not occur is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tweezing countercoup occurs.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the tweezing countercoup happens and the rest-cure occurs.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the retardation does not occur.; sent19 -> int3: the retardation happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the tweezing countercoup does not occur.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the crumbling trickery does not occur.; sent8 & sent10 -> int7: the slander does not occur.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__