the blastopore is not an integration.
sent1: the cigarette is not endermic. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a Stern. sent3: something does pitch kat but it does not gladden sibilation if it does delete. sent4: there is something such that it does not gladden Donetsk. sent5: something is iridic. sent6: something is autosomal if that it is not a velum and it repairs Jacobite is not right. sent7: if the cigarette does not pitch kat then the fact that the kat is not an integration and is not a kind of a Stern is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the kat deletes but it is not iridic does not hold if the cigarette is not endermic. sent9: that something either is not iridic or is non-endermic or both does not hold if that it is autosomal is correct. sent10: that the baguet is not a kind of a velum and repairs Jacobite does not hold. sent11: that the kat is a Stern and does not pitch kat is wrong if there exists something such that it is not a Stern. sent12: the blastopore is a Stern. sent13: if the cigarette is not endermic that the kat does delete and is iridic is incorrect. sent14: the cigarette does not pitch kat if the hoist does pitch kat and does not gladden sibilation. sent15: the kat is a Stern. sent16: the blastopore is a kind of an integration if there exists something such that it does gladden sibilation and it pitches kat. sent17: the kat does gladden sibilation if that it deletes and it is not iridic is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kat does not pitch kat.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the kat is a Stern and does not pitch kat.; sent2 & sent11 -> int2: that the kat is a kind of a Stern that does not pitch kat is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the kat pitches kat.; sent8 & sent1 -> int5: that the kat deletes and is not iridic is false.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the kat does gladden sibilation.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the kat gladdens sibilation and does pitch kat.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it gladdens sibilation and it pitches kat.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the blastopore is not a kind of an integration.
sent3 -> int9: if the hoist does delete then it does pitch kat and it does not gladden sibilation.; sent9 -> int10: if the baguet is autosomal then the fact that it is either not iridic or not endermic or both is wrong.; sent6 -> int11: if the fact that the baguet is not a velum and repairs Jacobite is not correct it is autosomal.; int11 & sent10 -> int12: the baguet is autosomal.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the baguet is non-iridic or non-endermic or both is not right.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that either it is not iridic or it is not endermic or both is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the blastopore is not an integration. ; $context$ = sent1: the cigarette is not endermic. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a Stern. sent3: something does pitch kat but it does not gladden sibilation if it does delete. sent4: there is something such that it does not gladden Donetsk. sent5: something is iridic. sent6: something is autosomal if that it is not a velum and it repairs Jacobite is not right. sent7: if the cigarette does not pitch kat then the fact that the kat is not an integration and is not a kind of a Stern is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the kat deletes but it is not iridic does not hold if the cigarette is not endermic. sent9: that something either is not iridic or is non-endermic or both does not hold if that it is autosomal is correct. sent10: that the baguet is not a kind of a velum and repairs Jacobite does not hold. sent11: that the kat is a Stern and does not pitch kat is wrong if there exists something such that it is not a Stern. sent12: the blastopore is a Stern. sent13: if the cigarette is not endermic that the kat does delete and is iridic is incorrect. sent14: the cigarette does not pitch kat if the hoist does pitch kat and does not gladden sibilation. sent15: the kat is a Stern. sent16: the blastopore is a kind of an integration if there exists something such that it does gladden sibilation and it pitches kat. sent17: the kat does gladden sibilation if that it deletes and it is not iridic is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kat does not pitch kat.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the kat is a Stern and does not pitch kat.; sent2 & sent11 -> int2: that the kat is a kind of a Stern that does not pitch kat is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the kat pitches kat.; sent8 & sent1 -> int5: that the kat deletes and is not iridic is false.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the kat does gladden sibilation.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the kat gladdens sibilation and does pitch kat.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it gladdens sibilation and it pitches kat.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__