the stabling does not troll vinyl and/or is conscientious if the vinyl is dietary.
sent1: the fact that the stabling is flatness hold. sent2: if the vinyl is a myope the fact that either the stabling is not a creditor or it is a dietary or both hold. sent3: the fact that the corkwood is not a creditor or does not clap or both is wrong if the vinyl is dietary. sent4: if the vinyl is a dietary the corkwood is a creditor. sent5: if the stabling is not a myope then it trolls vinyl or it is conscientious or both. sent6: the fact that the cachou is non-mediatorial and/or uncorrected does not hold. sent7: something that does not troll vinyl does not clap and/or is a myope. sent8: that the corkwood is a kind of a creditor is not incorrect. sent9: the vinyl does not troll Leicestershire or claps or both. sent10: the stabling does troll vinyl or is conscientious or both if the vinyl is a kind of a dietary. sent11: the vinyl is not conscientious. sent12: the stabling trolls vinyl and/or is conscientious. sent13: the corkwood is not a kind of a myope. sent14: the stabling is not a myope if that the corkwood is a kind of a creditor or it does not clap or both is wrong. sent15: something does troll vinyl and/or it is conscientious if that it is not a myope is not false. sent16: the stabling is not a myope if the fact that the corkwood is not a kind of a creditor and/or does not clap is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vinyl is a dietary.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the corkwood is not a creditor or it does not clap or both is not right.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the stabling is not a myope.;
$hypothesis$ = the stabling does not troll vinyl and/or is conscientious if the vinyl is dietary. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the stabling is flatness hold. sent2: if the vinyl is a myope the fact that either the stabling is not a creditor or it is a dietary or both hold. sent3: the fact that the corkwood is not a creditor or does not clap or both is wrong if the vinyl is dietary. sent4: if the vinyl is a dietary the corkwood is a creditor. sent5: if the stabling is not a myope then it trolls vinyl or it is conscientious or both. sent6: the fact that the cachou is non-mediatorial and/or uncorrected does not hold. sent7: something that does not troll vinyl does not clap and/or is a myope. sent8: that the corkwood is a kind of a creditor is not incorrect. sent9: the vinyl does not troll Leicestershire or claps or both. sent10: the stabling does troll vinyl or is conscientious or both if the vinyl is a kind of a dietary. sent11: the vinyl is not conscientious. sent12: the stabling trolls vinyl and/or is conscientious. sent13: the corkwood is not a kind of a myope. sent14: the stabling is not a myope if that the corkwood is a kind of a creditor or it does not clap or both is wrong. sent15: something does troll vinyl and/or it is conscientious if that it is not a myope is not false. sent16: the stabling is not a myope if the fact that the corkwood is not a kind of a creditor and/or does not clap is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vinyl is a dietary.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the corkwood is not a creditor or it does not clap or both is not right.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the stabling is not a myope.; __UNKNOWN__