the fact that the prophetess is a kind of absent thing that is not a straight does not hold.
sent1: the prophetess absents and it is Galwegian if the shaker does not ignore melon. sent2: the herm varnishes takeoff and it is ossiferous. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Sinai and is not a Pynchon does not hold then the grind is photochemical. sent4: The melon does ignore shaker. sent5: the fact that something is a Hitchcock but it is not a Eriophorum does not hold if it is not unobjectionable. sent6: the fact that the North is a yaw and not a shop does not hold if the grind is photochemical. sent7: the fact that the knight-errant is adient and does not vaticinate is false if the shaker is not Galwegian. sent8: the knight-errant is adient and does not vaticinate. sent9: if something that is Galwegian does ignore melon then the North is not a kind of a Hitchcock. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Sinai and it is not a kind of a Pynchon is false. sent11: something is not unobjectionable if that it is a kind of a yaw that does not shop is false. sent12: the fact that the fact that the defamer is ossiferous is not correct is not false if the herm varnishes takeoff and it is ossiferous. sent13: if that the knight-errant does not refute hedger and does not ignore melon does not hold the shaker does not ignore melon. sent14: something is metatarsal thing that does not varnish Minotaur if it is Galwegian. sent15: if the North is not a kind of a Hitchcock then it is not a kind of a straight. sent16: the shaker does ignore melon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shaker is not Galwegian.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the knight-errant is adient but it does not vaticinate is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the shaker is Galwegian.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the shaker is Galwegian and it does ignore melon.; int4 -> int5: something is Galwegian and ignores melon.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the North is not a kind of a Hitchcock.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the North is not straight.;
the prophetess is both absent and not a straight.
sent12 & sent2 -> int8: the defamer is not ossiferous.; int8 -> int9: something is not ossiferous.; sent5 -> int10: if the North is not unobjectionable then that it is a Hitchcock and it is not a kind of a Eriophorum is not true.; sent11 -> int11: the North is not unobjectionable if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a yaw that is not a shop hold is not correct.; sent10 & sent3 -> int12: the grind is photochemical.; sent6 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the North is a yaw but it is not a shop is not correct.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the North is not unobjectionable.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the fact that the North is a Hitchcock and is not a Eriophorum is correct is not correct.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it is a Hitchcock that is not a Eriophorum is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the prophetess is a kind of absent thing that is not a straight does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the prophetess absents and it is Galwegian if the shaker does not ignore melon. sent2: the herm varnishes takeoff and it is ossiferous. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Sinai and is not a Pynchon does not hold then the grind is photochemical. sent4: The melon does ignore shaker. sent5: the fact that something is a Hitchcock but it is not a Eriophorum does not hold if it is not unobjectionable. sent6: the fact that the North is a yaw and not a shop does not hold if the grind is photochemical. sent7: the fact that the knight-errant is adient and does not vaticinate is false if the shaker is not Galwegian. sent8: the knight-errant is adient and does not vaticinate. sent9: if something that is Galwegian does ignore melon then the North is not a kind of a Hitchcock. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Sinai and it is not a kind of a Pynchon is false. sent11: something is not unobjectionable if that it is a kind of a yaw that does not shop is false. sent12: the fact that the fact that the defamer is ossiferous is not correct is not false if the herm varnishes takeoff and it is ossiferous. sent13: if that the knight-errant does not refute hedger and does not ignore melon does not hold the shaker does not ignore melon. sent14: something is metatarsal thing that does not varnish Minotaur if it is Galwegian. sent15: if the North is not a kind of a Hitchcock then it is not a kind of a straight. sent16: the shaker does ignore melon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shaker is not Galwegian.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the knight-errant is adient but it does not vaticinate is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the shaker is Galwegian.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the shaker is Galwegian and it does ignore melon.; int4 -> int5: something is Galwegian and ignores melon.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the North is not a kind of a Hitchcock.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the North is not straight.; __UNKNOWN__