the yeoman is a Lin.
sent1: the kunzite is an umpire if it is a kind of a yardage. sent2: that the kunzite is unjust and it is a survey is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the western does study yeoman and does not arouse if the Roquefort is not restless is not false. sent4: if the western does arouse the Roquefort studies yeoman. sent5: that the western is not rh-negative but it is an umpire is false if the fact that it does not arouse hold. sent6: something is rh-negative and is an umpire. sent7: if the yeoman is a kind of an umpire then the kunzite is a Lin. sent8: the kunzite is not rh-negative if that it is unjust and it is a survey is not true. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-rh-negative thing that is an umpire then that the western does arouse is not incorrect. sent10: the kunzite is a yardage. sent11: the linsey-woolsey is restless if the Roquefort does study yeoman.
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the kunzite is not rh-negative.; sent1 & sent10 -> int2: the kunzite is an umpire.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the kunzite is not rh-negative but it is an umpire.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is non-rh-negative thing that is an umpire.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the western does arouse.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the Roquefort does study yeoman hold.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the linsey-woolsey is restless.;
that the fact that the particulate is a kind of a survey that is a neckpiece is not wrong is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the yeoman is a Lin. ; $context$ = sent1: the kunzite is an umpire if it is a kind of a yardage. sent2: that the kunzite is unjust and it is a survey is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the western does study yeoman and does not arouse if the Roquefort is not restless is not false. sent4: if the western does arouse the Roquefort studies yeoman. sent5: that the western is not rh-negative but it is an umpire is false if the fact that it does not arouse hold. sent6: something is rh-negative and is an umpire. sent7: if the yeoman is a kind of an umpire then the kunzite is a Lin. sent8: the kunzite is not rh-negative if that it is unjust and it is a survey is not true. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-rh-negative thing that is an umpire then that the western does arouse is not incorrect. sent10: the kunzite is a yardage. sent11: the linsey-woolsey is restless if the Roquefort does study yeoman. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the kunzite is not rh-negative.; sent1 & sent10 -> int2: the kunzite is an umpire.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the kunzite is not rh-negative but it is an umpire.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is non-rh-negative thing that is an umpire.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the western does arouse.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the Roquefort does study yeoman hold.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the linsey-woolsey is restless.; __UNKNOWN__