the fact that if the frisking Etropus happens the woodiness does not occur but the acceptableness occurs is false.
sent1: if the mystification does not occur that the non-acceptableness and the mildness occurs hold. sent2: if the frisking Etropus does not occur then the internship but not the woodiness occurs. sent3: that that both the mystification and the busywork happens is correct is brought about by the non-sapphirineness. sent4: the acceptableness happens and the deprecation occurs if the cosmolatry does not occur. sent5: if the woodiness and the frisking Etropus occurs the mildness does not occur. sent6: the sapphirineness does not occur. sent7: the cosmolatry does not occur. sent8: that the mildness does not occur yields that the busywork does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the woodiness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frisking Etropus occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the woodiness occurs and the frisking Etropus happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the mildness does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the busywork does not occur.; sent3 & sent6 -> int4: the mystification happens and the busywork happens.; int4 -> int5: that the busywork does not occur is false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the woodiness does not occur.; sent4 & sent7 -> int8: the acceptableness happens and the deprecation happens.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the acceptableness happens is not wrong.; int7 & int9 -> int10: both the nonwoodyness and the acceptableness occurs.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the internship happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the frisking Etropus happens the woodiness does not occur but the acceptableness occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mystification does not occur that the non-acceptableness and the mildness occurs hold. sent2: if the frisking Etropus does not occur then the internship but not the woodiness occurs. sent3: that that both the mystification and the busywork happens is correct is brought about by the non-sapphirineness. sent4: the acceptableness happens and the deprecation occurs if the cosmolatry does not occur. sent5: if the woodiness and the frisking Etropus occurs the mildness does not occur. sent6: the sapphirineness does not occur. sent7: the cosmolatry does not occur. sent8: that the mildness does not occur yields that the busywork does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the woodiness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frisking Etropus occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the woodiness occurs and the frisking Etropus happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the mildness does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the busywork does not occur.; sent3 & sent6 -> int4: the mystification happens and the busywork happens.; int4 -> int5: that the busywork does not occur is false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the woodiness does not occur.; sent4 & sent7 -> int8: the acceptableness happens and the deprecation happens.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the acceptableness happens is not wrong.; int7 & int9 -> int10: both the nonwoodyness and the acceptableness occurs.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__