the lingonberry does clangor partialness.
sent1: if that the kitchenette is indispensable is not false the lingonberry does clangor partialness. sent2: something is a kind of a acidophil and it is a kind of a Yuman if it is not expedient. sent3: the paleface is not a Yuman. sent4: if the paleface is not a Yuman then the kitchenette is indispensable and/or is a Solomons. sent5: the douche is not a Solomons. sent6: the kitchenette is a kind of a Solomons and/or it is Yuman if the paleface does not clangor partialness. sent7: the lingonberry clangors partialness if the kitchenette is a kind of a Solomons. sent8: the paleface is aphetic. sent9: the fact that the kitchenette is non-aphetic is correct.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the kitchenette is indispensable or is a kind of a Solomons or both.; int1 & sent1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the lingonberry does not clangor partialness.
sent2 -> int2: if the paleface is not an expedient then it is a acidophil and is a Yuman.;
$hypothesis$ = the lingonberry does clangor partialness. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the kitchenette is indispensable is not false the lingonberry does clangor partialness. sent2: something is a kind of a acidophil and it is a kind of a Yuman if it is not expedient. sent3: the paleface is not a Yuman. sent4: if the paleface is not a Yuman then the kitchenette is indispensable and/or is a Solomons. sent5: the douche is not a Solomons. sent6: the kitchenette is a kind of a Solomons and/or it is Yuman if the paleface does not clangor partialness. sent7: the lingonberry clangors partialness if the kitchenette is a kind of a Solomons. sent8: the paleface is aphetic. sent9: the fact that the kitchenette is non-aphetic is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the kitchenette is indispensable or is a kind of a Solomons or both.; int1 & sent1 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__