the flourish is a millenary.
sent1: if the no does not sniff escadrille then the halibut does not sniff escadrille and does not empty distillery. sent2: if the zoril empties distillery then the halibut is a Becquerel. sent3: the flourish is a prolapse. sent4: the summation is not corporate and it is not nordic. sent5: if the fact that something is not a deviationist but it is a millenary is not true then it is not millenary. sent6: if the no is not a short it does not sniff escadrille. sent7: if something does not sniff escadrille and does not consolidate animatism it is not a prolapse. sent8: the zoril is a Becquerel. sent9: the halibut does not empty distillery and does not consolidate animatism. sent10: the fact that the zoril is a kind of a prolapse hold. sent11: the no is not short if the zoril is both a deviationist and a prolapse. sent12: the no does not sniff escadrille and does not consolidate animatism if it does not empty distillery. sent13: the flourish is a millenary if the summation does consolidate animatism. sent14: if something is not a prolapse then it is not a kind of a short and it is a kind of a Becquerel. sent15: if the no is not short and is a Becquerel the zoril is a Becquerel. sent16: the no prolapses. sent17: the zoril is a Becquerel and it is a kind of a deviationist. sent18: if the halibut does not sniff escadrille and it does not empty distillery that the summation consolidates animatism is not false. sent19: the flourish does consolidate animatism if the no is non-short thing that is not a millenary. sent20: the summation is millenary if the flourish does sniff escadrille and does not consolidate animatism. sent21: the halibut does sniff subjectivist and it does sniff Monsieur.
sent17 -> int1: the zoril is a deviationist.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the zoril is a deviationist and it is a kind of a prolapse.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the no is not short.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the no does not sniff escadrille.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the halibut does not sniff escadrille and it does not empty distillery.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the summation does consolidate animatism.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the flourish is not millenary.
sent5 -> int7: if the fact that the flourish is not a deviationist but it is a kind of a millenary is not right then it is not a millenary.; sent14 -> int8: if that the no is not a kind of a prolapse is not false it is not a kind of a short and it is a Becquerel.; sent7 -> int9: the no does not prolapse if it does not sniff escadrille and does not consolidate animatism.; sent21 -> int10: something sniffs subjectivist and it does sniff Monsieur.;
$hypothesis$ = the flourish is a millenary. ; $context$ = sent1: if the no does not sniff escadrille then the halibut does not sniff escadrille and does not empty distillery. sent2: if the zoril empties distillery then the halibut is a Becquerel. sent3: the flourish is a prolapse. sent4: the summation is not corporate and it is not nordic. sent5: if the fact that something is not a deviationist but it is a millenary is not true then it is not millenary. sent6: if the no is not a short it does not sniff escadrille. sent7: if something does not sniff escadrille and does not consolidate animatism it is not a prolapse. sent8: the zoril is a Becquerel. sent9: the halibut does not empty distillery and does not consolidate animatism. sent10: the fact that the zoril is a kind of a prolapse hold. sent11: the no is not short if the zoril is both a deviationist and a prolapse. sent12: the no does not sniff escadrille and does not consolidate animatism if it does not empty distillery. sent13: the flourish is a millenary if the summation does consolidate animatism. sent14: if something is not a prolapse then it is not a kind of a short and it is a kind of a Becquerel. sent15: if the no is not short and is a Becquerel the zoril is a Becquerel. sent16: the no prolapses. sent17: the zoril is a Becquerel and it is a kind of a deviationist. sent18: if the halibut does not sniff escadrille and it does not empty distillery that the summation consolidates animatism is not false. sent19: the flourish does consolidate animatism if the no is non-short thing that is not a millenary. sent20: the summation is millenary if the flourish does sniff escadrille and does not consolidate animatism. sent21: the halibut does sniff subjectivist and it does sniff Monsieur. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the zoril is a deviationist.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the zoril is a deviationist and it is a kind of a prolapse.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the no is not short.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the no does not sniff escadrille.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the halibut does not sniff escadrille and it does not empty distillery.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the summation does consolidate animatism.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__