the fact that the moonlight happens is not wrong.
sent1: the fact that the amplifying tie does not occur and the moonlight happens is not correct if the praetorship happens. sent2: the amplifying tie happens. sent3: both the pulp and the praetorship happens. sent4: that the sluice does not occur if the fact that the spoiling whiff does not occur and the uppercut does not occur is false hold. sent5: the mutter does not occur if that not the amplifying tie but the moonlight occurs is not true. sent6: the non-slipperiness is caused by that the spoiling whiff does not occur and the uppercut does not occur. sent7: that not the spoiling whiff but the uppercut happens causes that the slipperiness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the inconvenientness does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the slipperiness happens if that the amplifying tie occurs is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spoiling whiff does not occur and the uppercut does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the slipperiness does not occur.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the slipperiness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the spoiling whiff does not occur and the uppercut does not occur is wrong.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the sluicing does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the sluicing does not occur and the inconvenientness does not occur.;
the mutter does not occur and the mayoralness does not occur.
sent3 -> int7: the praetorship occurs.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: that the amplifying tie does not occur and the moonlighting happens is not true.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the mutter does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the moonlight happens is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the amplifying tie does not occur and the moonlight happens is not correct if the praetorship happens. sent2: the amplifying tie happens. sent3: both the pulp and the praetorship happens. sent4: that the sluice does not occur if the fact that the spoiling whiff does not occur and the uppercut does not occur is false hold. sent5: the mutter does not occur if that not the amplifying tie but the moonlight occurs is not true. sent6: the non-slipperiness is caused by that the spoiling whiff does not occur and the uppercut does not occur. sent7: that not the spoiling whiff but the uppercut happens causes that the slipperiness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the inconvenientness does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the slipperiness happens if that the amplifying tie occurs is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spoiling whiff does not occur and the uppercut does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the slipperiness does not occur.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the slipperiness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the spoiling whiff does not occur and the uppercut does not occur is wrong.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the sluicing does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the sluicing does not occur and the inconvenientness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__