the intracerebralness happens.
sent1: the fact that the fixing affect does not occur is correct if that the fixing affect but not the afferent occurs is wrong. sent2: that the axiologicalness happens prevents the intracerebralness. sent3: the axiologicalness occurs if the afferent happens. sent4: if the fixing affect does not occur and the parsing hoofer does not occur the intracerebralness occurs. sent5: the lacing obligation does not occur if the parsing hoofer occurs. sent6: the intracerebralness happens if the fact that the intracerebralness does not occur and the casualty does not occur is not right. sent7: the casualty and the mumbling happens if the fixing fan does not occur. sent8: if both the transuranicness and the axiologicalness occurs then the parsing hoofer does not occur. sent9: the transuranicness does not occur. sent10: that the axiologicalness occurs and the transuranicness does not occur prevents the fixing affect. sent11: the transuranicness is brought about by that the mill does not occur and the afferent does not occur. sent12: the non-transuranicness and the non-axiologicalness occurs if the casualty happens. sent13: if that the parsing hoofer happens is true the milling does not occur. sent14: the parsing hoofer happens or the fixing affect does not occur or both. sent15: if that the non-afferentness and/or the milling happens does not hold the fixing affect does not occur. sent16: if the mumbling happens then that the intracerebralness does not occur and the casualty does not occur does not hold. sent17: that the mill does not occur is triggered by that the fixing affect does not occur. sent18: that the photovoltaicness does not occur brings about that the transuranicness happens and the axiologicalness happens. sent19: the non-photovoltaicness causes that the afferent and the milling happens. sent20: the bacchanal does not occur. sent21: that that the non-afferentness and/or the milling occurs hold is incorrect if the casualty happens.
sent14 & sent13 & sent17 -> int1: the mill does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the afferent does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the mill does not occur and the afferent does not occur.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the transuranicness happens.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the afferentness happens.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the axiologicalness occurs.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the intracerebralness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the intracerebralness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fixing affect does not occur is correct if that the fixing affect but not the afferent occurs is wrong. sent2: that the axiologicalness happens prevents the intracerebralness. sent3: the axiologicalness occurs if the afferent happens. sent4: if the fixing affect does not occur and the parsing hoofer does not occur the intracerebralness occurs. sent5: the lacing obligation does not occur if the parsing hoofer occurs. sent6: the intracerebralness happens if the fact that the intracerebralness does not occur and the casualty does not occur is not right. sent7: the casualty and the mumbling happens if the fixing fan does not occur. sent8: if both the transuranicness and the axiologicalness occurs then the parsing hoofer does not occur. sent9: the transuranicness does not occur. sent10: that the axiologicalness occurs and the transuranicness does not occur prevents the fixing affect. sent11: the transuranicness is brought about by that the mill does not occur and the afferent does not occur. sent12: the non-transuranicness and the non-axiologicalness occurs if the casualty happens. sent13: if that the parsing hoofer happens is true the milling does not occur. sent14: the parsing hoofer happens or the fixing affect does not occur or both. sent15: if that the non-afferentness and/or the milling happens does not hold the fixing affect does not occur. sent16: if the mumbling happens then that the intracerebralness does not occur and the casualty does not occur does not hold. sent17: that the mill does not occur is triggered by that the fixing affect does not occur. sent18: that the photovoltaicness does not occur brings about that the transuranicness happens and the axiologicalness happens. sent19: the non-photovoltaicness causes that the afferent and the milling happens. sent20: the bacchanal does not occur. sent21: that that the non-afferentness and/or the milling occurs hold is incorrect if the casualty happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent13 & sent17 -> int1: the mill does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the afferent does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the mill does not occur and the afferent does not occur.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the transuranicness happens.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the afferentness happens.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the axiologicalness occurs.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__