the Yemeni does not blast.
sent1: the fact that the five-spot is nectariferous and/or is a fruit is not correct. sent2: the ketch is not blastospheric. sent3: if the fact that the five-spot is arithmetical and/or it wrests rebellion does not hold the fact that it is not a clinker is right. sent4: the fact that the five-spot is a kind of a cirrocumulus and/or it wrests rebellion is wrong. sent5: if the ketch is not blastospheric but it is a kind of a clinker then the Yemeni does not blast. sent6: the ketch is not blastospheric if the five-spot is not a clinker. sent7: the federalist is arithmetical if that the expurgator clinkers but it is not arithmetical is not correct. sent8: the ketch is not blastospheric and clinkers if the five-spot is not a clinkers. sent9: if the federalist does not mystify rosemary then the five-spot does not wrest rebellion. sent10: that the expurgator is a clinker but not arithmetical is not correct. sent11: if the fact that the federalist is a Jacksonian but it is not a kind of a blast does not hold the Yemeni blast. sent12: the expurgator wrests bluebonnet if the fact that it is a cirrocumulus and/or it does not jazz Azaleastrum is wrong. sent13: the fact that the federalist is a Jacksonian hold. sent14: the five-spot is not a Jacksonian. sent15: that the welterweight is not a clinker is not incorrect. sent16: if the federalist does not mystify rosemary the fact that the five-spot either is arithmetical or wrests rebellion or both is not right. sent17: the yarrow is not a cirrocumulus. sent18: the ketch mystifies rosemary. sent19: if the five-spot is not blastospheric the ketch is not a kind of a clinker. sent20: that the expurgator is a cirrocumulus or does not jazz Azaleastrum or both is not true. sent21: if the federalist is a Jacksonian and mystifies rosemary then the expurgator does not wrest bluebonnet.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the federalist mystifies rosemary.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the federalist is a kind of Jacksonian thing that mystifies rosemary.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the expurgator does not wrest bluebonnet.; sent12 & sent20 -> int3: the expurgator does wrest bluebonnet.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the federalist does not mystify rosemary.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: that the five-spot is arithmetical or it wrests rebellion or both is incorrect.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the five-spot does not clinker.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the ketch is not blastospheric and does clinker.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the enophile is a kind of a cirrocumulus.
sent7 & sent10 -> int9: the federalist is arithmetical.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is arithmetical.;
$hypothesis$ = the Yemeni does not blast. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the five-spot is nectariferous and/or is a fruit is not correct. sent2: the ketch is not blastospheric. sent3: if the fact that the five-spot is arithmetical and/or it wrests rebellion does not hold the fact that it is not a clinker is right. sent4: the fact that the five-spot is a kind of a cirrocumulus and/or it wrests rebellion is wrong. sent5: if the ketch is not blastospheric but it is a kind of a clinker then the Yemeni does not blast. sent6: the ketch is not blastospheric if the five-spot is not a clinker. sent7: the federalist is arithmetical if that the expurgator clinkers but it is not arithmetical is not correct. sent8: the ketch is not blastospheric and clinkers if the five-spot is not a clinkers. sent9: if the federalist does not mystify rosemary then the five-spot does not wrest rebellion. sent10: that the expurgator is a clinker but not arithmetical is not correct. sent11: if the fact that the federalist is a Jacksonian but it is not a kind of a blast does not hold the Yemeni blast. sent12: the expurgator wrests bluebonnet if the fact that it is a cirrocumulus and/or it does not jazz Azaleastrum is wrong. sent13: the fact that the federalist is a Jacksonian hold. sent14: the five-spot is not a Jacksonian. sent15: that the welterweight is not a clinker is not incorrect. sent16: if the federalist does not mystify rosemary the fact that the five-spot either is arithmetical or wrests rebellion or both is not right. sent17: the yarrow is not a cirrocumulus. sent18: the ketch mystifies rosemary. sent19: if the five-spot is not blastospheric the ketch is not a kind of a clinker. sent20: that the expurgator is a cirrocumulus or does not jazz Azaleastrum or both is not true. sent21: if the federalist is a Jacksonian and mystifies rosemary then the expurgator does not wrest bluebonnet. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the federalist mystifies rosemary.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the federalist is a kind of Jacksonian thing that mystifies rosemary.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the expurgator does not wrest bluebonnet.; sent12 & sent20 -> int3: the expurgator does wrest bluebonnet.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the federalist does not mystify rosemary.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: that the five-spot is arithmetical or it wrests rebellion or both is incorrect.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the five-spot does not clinker.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the ketch is not blastospheric and does clinker.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__