that the beginning progressiveness does not occur and the purring does not occur is caused by that the docileness does not occur.
sent1: the airflow occurs. sent2: that the purring happens leads to the docileness. sent3: if the shellfire does not occur then the truss does not occur and the blocking complementarity does not occur. sent4: that the beginning progressiveness does not occur and the purr does not occur is triggered by that the docileness occurs. sent5: the tattoo occurs. sent6: the raking shamelessness does not occur. sent7: the Ismaili does not occur and the synthesizing does not occur. sent8: the interposition occurs. sent9: that the beginning progressiveness does not occur is correct. sent10: the beginning Polyangium does not occur and the karate does not occur if the raking creole-fish does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the purring happens hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the docileness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the docileness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the purring does not occur.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the beginning progressiveness does not occur and the purr does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the beginning progressiveness does not occur and the purring does not occur is caused by that the docileness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the airflow occurs. sent2: that the purring happens leads to the docileness. sent3: if the shellfire does not occur then the truss does not occur and the blocking complementarity does not occur. sent4: that the beginning progressiveness does not occur and the purr does not occur is triggered by that the docileness occurs. sent5: the tattoo occurs. sent6: the raking shamelessness does not occur. sent7: the Ismaili does not occur and the synthesizing does not occur. sent8: the interposition occurs. sent9: that the beginning progressiveness does not occur is correct. sent10: the beginning Polyangium does not occur and the karate does not occur if the raking creole-fish does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the purring happens hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the docileness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the docileness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the purring does not occur.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the beginning progressiveness does not occur and the purr does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__