if the departer is a floodhead the fact that that the communist is non-Palladian thing that resets edacity hold does not hold.
sent1: that the communist is not Palladian but it resets edacity is not correct if the departer is a kind of a Passero. sent2: that the communist is non-Palladian a Passero does not hold if the departer resets edacity. sent3: if the departer is a floodhead the fact that it is a Monocanthidae hold. sent4: that something does not still rebozo and is unrepeatable is incorrect if it is not a floodhead. sent5: the fact that the communist is Palladian and does reset edacity is not right if the departer is a kind of a Passero. sent6: the fact that the communist is Palladian and it does reset edacity is wrong if the departer is a floodhead. sent7: the departer is a floodhead if it resets edacity. sent8: a Monocanthidae is a kind of a Passero. sent9: the fact that the departer does not reset edacity but it is a Passero is not right if the fact that the communist is Palladian is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the departer is a kind of a floodhead is true.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the departer is a kind of a Monocanthidae.; sent8 -> int2: the departer is a Passero if it is a Monocanthidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the departer is a Passero.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the communist is not Palladian but it resets edacity is incorrect.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the tapioca does not still rebozo but it is unrepeatable is not correct.
sent4 -> int5: if the tapioca is not a floodhead then the fact that the fact that it does not still rebozo and is unrepeatable is not incorrect is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = if the departer is a floodhead the fact that that the communist is non-Palladian thing that resets edacity hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the communist is not Palladian but it resets edacity is not correct if the departer is a kind of a Passero. sent2: that the communist is non-Palladian a Passero does not hold if the departer resets edacity. sent3: if the departer is a floodhead the fact that it is a Monocanthidae hold. sent4: that something does not still rebozo and is unrepeatable is incorrect if it is not a floodhead. sent5: the fact that the communist is Palladian and does reset edacity is not right if the departer is a kind of a Passero. sent6: the fact that the communist is Palladian and it does reset edacity is wrong if the departer is a floodhead. sent7: the departer is a floodhead if it resets edacity. sent8: a Monocanthidae is a kind of a Passero. sent9: the fact that the departer does not reset edacity but it is a Passero is not right if the fact that the communist is Palladian is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the departer is a kind of a floodhead is true.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the departer is a kind of a Monocanthidae.; sent8 -> int2: the departer is a Passero if it is a Monocanthidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the departer is a Passero.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the communist is not Palladian but it resets edacity is incorrect.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__