the fact that the Pitman does not cleave Ohio and it is not a icecream is wrong.
sent1: if the cafe does rear Plimsoll that the Pitman does not cleave Ohio but it is a kind of a icecream is incorrect. sent2: something does cleave Ohio and it is a icecream. sent3: if the Pitman is a esophagoscope that the Plimsoll does not cleave Ohio and is not a icecream is not true. sent4: the Plimsoll is not a kind of a esophagoscope and is decisive. sent5: the cafe does rear Plimsoll if the shedding is a kindheartedness. sent6: the Pitman is not a Otariidae if the fact that it cleaves focus and is eudemonic is not correct. sent7: if the fact that something is not a Otariidae is right it does not rear Plimsoll and is not a kindheartedness. sent8: if something is not a kindheartedness it does not cleave Ohio and it is not a icecream. sent9: the shedding is a kind of a kindheartedness if there is something such that it is both not a esophagoscope and decisive. sent10: if something is not monaural then the fact that it cleaves focus and is eudemonic does not hold. sent11: the Pitman is decisive. sent12: that the Plimsoll is not decisive and it is not a kindheartedness is not true. sent13: that the Pitman does cleave Ohio but it is not a icecream does not hold. sent14: if the cafe does rear Plimsoll then the fact that the Pitman does not cleave Ohio and it is not a icecream is not right.
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that it is both not a esophagoscope and decisive.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the shedding is a kindheartedness.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the cafe rears Plimsoll.; sent14 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Pitman does not cleave Ohio and it is not a icecream.
sent8 -> int4: the Pitman does not cleave Ohio and it is not a icecream if that it is not a kindheartedness hold.; sent7 -> int5: if the Pitman is not a Otariidae it does not rear Plimsoll and is not a kind of a kindheartedness.; sent10 -> int6: the fact that the Pitman cleaves focus and it is eudemonic is incorrect if it is not monaural.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Pitman does not cleave Ohio and it is not a icecream is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cafe does rear Plimsoll that the Pitman does not cleave Ohio but it is a kind of a icecream is incorrect. sent2: something does cleave Ohio and it is a icecream. sent3: if the Pitman is a esophagoscope that the Plimsoll does not cleave Ohio and is not a icecream is not true. sent4: the Plimsoll is not a kind of a esophagoscope and is decisive. sent5: the cafe does rear Plimsoll if the shedding is a kindheartedness. sent6: the Pitman is not a Otariidae if the fact that it cleaves focus and is eudemonic is not correct. sent7: if the fact that something is not a Otariidae is right it does not rear Plimsoll and is not a kindheartedness. sent8: if something is not a kindheartedness it does not cleave Ohio and it is not a icecream. sent9: the shedding is a kind of a kindheartedness if there is something such that it is both not a esophagoscope and decisive. sent10: if something is not monaural then the fact that it cleaves focus and is eudemonic does not hold. sent11: the Pitman is decisive. sent12: that the Plimsoll is not decisive and it is not a kindheartedness is not true. sent13: that the Pitman does cleave Ohio but it is not a icecream does not hold. sent14: if the cafe does rear Plimsoll then the fact that the Pitman does not cleave Ohio and it is not a icecream is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that it is both not a esophagoscope and decisive.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the shedding is a kindheartedness.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the cafe rears Plimsoll.; sent14 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__