the chick is a acre-foot and it is a extirpation.
sent1: something is a acre-foot if it is a micrometer. sent2: if the fact that the idolatress patronages brioche but it is not a extirpation is not correct then it is a kind of a extirpation. sent3: that the chick is territorial but it does not poultice thyrse is false. sent4: that the idolatress does patronage brioche but it is not a extirpation is false. sent5: the phlegm does poultice nationality if that it climbs and it is not a sugar is not correct. sent6: the idolatress poultices thyrse. sent7: the fact that the idolatress is a kind of a micrometer that is a extirpation is false. sent8: if the idolatress is a extirpation the chick is a extirpation. sent9: if something promises then that it does multiply phenomenology and is not a kind of a micrometer is not right. sent10: that the phlegm does climb but it is not a sugar is incorrect. sent11: the fact that something is elastic thing that does not patronage brioche is not true if it is a acre-foot. sent12: something that poultices nationality is an apron and not a rocambole. sent13: the idolatress is a acre-foot if the fact that the chick is not a extirpation or not a acre-foot or both does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the triazolam multiplies phenomenology and is not a micrometer is not true then the chick is not a micrometer. sent15: if something is not an applet it does not multiply histology and/or is non-choral. sent16: the zymase is not an applet if the phlegm is a kind of an apron but it is not a rocambole.
sent1 -> int1: if that the chick is a micrometer is correct it is a kind of a acre-foot.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the idolatress is a extirpation.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the chick is a extirpation.;
the fact that the idolatress is a kind of an elastic but it does not patronage brioche is not true.
sent11 -> int4: the fact that the idolatress is elastic thing that does not patronage brioche is not true if it is a acre-foot.; sent9 -> int5: if the triazolam does promise that it does multiply phenomenology and is not a kind of a micrometer is not right.; sent15 -> int6: if the zymase is not a kind of an applet then it either does not multiply histology or is not choral or both.; sent12 -> int7: if the phlegm poultices nationality it is an apron and it is not a rocambole.; sent5 & sent10 -> int8: the phlegm does poultice nationality.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the phlegm is an apron but it is not a rocambole.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the zymase is not a kind of an applet.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the zymase does not multiply histology or it is not choral or both.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that either it does not multiply histology or it is not choral or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the chick is a acre-foot and it is a extirpation. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a acre-foot if it is a micrometer. sent2: if the fact that the idolatress patronages brioche but it is not a extirpation is not correct then it is a kind of a extirpation. sent3: that the chick is territorial but it does not poultice thyrse is false. sent4: that the idolatress does patronage brioche but it is not a extirpation is false. sent5: the phlegm does poultice nationality if that it climbs and it is not a sugar is not correct. sent6: the idolatress poultices thyrse. sent7: the fact that the idolatress is a kind of a micrometer that is a extirpation is false. sent8: if the idolatress is a extirpation the chick is a extirpation. sent9: if something promises then that it does multiply phenomenology and is not a kind of a micrometer is not right. sent10: that the phlegm does climb but it is not a sugar is incorrect. sent11: the fact that something is elastic thing that does not patronage brioche is not true if it is a acre-foot. sent12: something that poultices nationality is an apron and not a rocambole. sent13: the idolatress is a acre-foot if the fact that the chick is not a extirpation or not a acre-foot or both does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the triazolam multiplies phenomenology and is not a micrometer is not true then the chick is not a micrometer. sent15: if something is not an applet it does not multiply histology and/or is non-choral. sent16: the zymase is not an applet if the phlegm is a kind of an apron but it is not a rocambole. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if that the chick is a micrometer is correct it is a kind of a acre-foot.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the idolatress is a extirpation.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the chick is a extirpation.; __UNKNOWN__