that the roughlegness does not occur brings about that the immigrating does not occur and the proclamation does not occur.
sent1: the hieraticness does not occur and the observing does not occur. sent2: the naprapathy does not occur if the fact that the fact that the comforting and the slice occurs is not right is right. sent3: the unwrapping anima does not occur. sent4: the Napoleonicness is prevented by that the character happens and the carpellateness happens. sent5: if the pleasure does not occur the heaviness does not occur and the spieling disincentive does not occur. sent6: the bank does not occur. sent7: that the dyslexicness does not occur prevents the differing. sent8: the unwrapping segregator does not occur and the caseating does not occur. sent9: if the naming does not occur and the naprapathy does not occur the character happens. sent10: the censusing happens and the emergence happens. sent11: that the naming does not occur is brought about by that the unwrapping Vinson occurs and the recurrence occurs. sent12: the immigrating does not occur and the proclamation does not occur if the Napoleonicness does not occur. sent13: the unwrapping Vinson and the recurrence occurs. sent14: the fact that the strategicness does not occur hold. sent15: if the wiretaping does not occur then the colorimetry does not occur. sent16: the nourishment does not occur. sent17: the roughlegness happens if the mentalness happens. sent18: the spieling achondrite does not occur. sent19: the washableness does not occur. sent20: the spieling ammoniac does not occur. sent21: that the proclamation occurs is prevented by the non-roughlegness. sent22: that both the mentalness and the roughing occurs leads to that the obviousness does not occur. sent23: if the fact that the colorimetry happens and the differing occurs hold then the endorsement does not occur. sent24: if the mentalness does not occur then the carpellateness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mentalness occurs.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the roughleg happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the roughleg does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the mentalness does not occur.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the carpellateness occurs.; sent11 & sent13 -> int5: that the naming does not occur hold.;
the obviousness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the roughlegness does not occur brings about that the immigrating does not occur and the proclamation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the hieraticness does not occur and the observing does not occur. sent2: the naprapathy does not occur if the fact that the fact that the comforting and the slice occurs is not right is right. sent3: the unwrapping anima does not occur. sent4: the Napoleonicness is prevented by that the character happens and the carpellateness happens. sent5: if the pleasure does not occur the heaviness does not occur and the spieling disincentive does not occur. sent6: the bank does not occur. sent7: that the dyslexicness does not occur prevents the differing. sent8: the unwrapping segregator does not occur and the caseating does not occur. sent9: if the naming does not occur and the naprapathy does not occur the character happens. sent10: the censusing happens and the emergence happens. sent11: that the naming does not occur is brought about by that the unwrapping Vinson occurs and the recurrence occurs. sent12: the immigrating does not occur and the proclamation does not occur if the Napoleonicness does not occur. sent13: the unwrapping Vinson and the recurrence occurs. sent14: the fact that the strategicness does not occur hold. sent15: if the wiretaping does not occur then the colorimetry does not occur. sent16: the nourishment does not occur. sent17: the roughlegness happens if the mentalness happens. sent18: the spieling achondrite does not occur. sent19: the washableness does not occur. sent20: the spieling ammoniac does not occur. sent21: that the proclamation occurs is prevented by the non-roughlegness. sent22: that both the mentalness and the roughing occurs leads to that the obviousness does not occur. sent23: if the fact that the colorimetry happens and the differing occurs hold then the endorsement does not occur. sent24: if the mentalness does not occur then the carpellateness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mentalness occurs.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the roughleg happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the roughleg does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the mentalness does not occur.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the carpellateness occurs.; sent11 & sent13 -> int5: that the naming does not occur hold.; __UNKNOWN__