the Constable does not reciprocate meat.
sent1: the frontbencher does spoof blowjob. sent2: if something is not a bulbed then it does not gnaw or it is a Cetoniidae or both. sent3: the fact that the frontbencher does not gnaw or it is a Cetoniidae or both does not hold if there exists something such that it does reciprocate title. sent4: the ascoma reciprocates title. sent5: if something does abrade and it is a kind of a periosteum it is not a kind of a bulbed. sent6: the Constable does bring if it dandles barbwire. sent7: The title reciprocates ascoma. sent8: if the Constable brings the frontbencher does abrade. sent9: if the Constable does not dandle barbwire it does not reciprocate meat. sent10: the frontbencher is a kind of a periosteum and spoofs blowjob.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Constable dandles barbwire.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the Constable brings.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the frontbencher abrades.; sent10 -> int3: the frontbencher is a periosteum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the frontbencher abrades and it is a periosteum.; sent5 -> int5: that the frontbencher is not a bulbed is right if it abrades and is a periosteum.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the frontbencher is not a bulbed.; sent2 -> int7: the frontbencher does not gnaw or it is a Cetoniidae or both if it is not a kind of a bulbed.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the frontbencher does not gnaw or is a kind of a Cetoniidae or both.; sent4 -> int9: there exists something such that it does reciprocate title.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the fact that the frontbencher does not gnaw or it is a kind of a Cetoniidae or both is not true.; int8 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the Constable does not dandle barbwire.; int12 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Constable does not reciprocate meat. ; $context$ = sent1: the frontbencher does spoof blowjob. sent2: if something is not a bulbed then it does not gnaw or it is a Cetoniidae or both. sent3: the fact that the frontbencher does not gnaw or it is a Cetoniidae or both does not hold if there exists something such that it does reciprocate title. sent4: the ascoma reciprocates title. sent5: if something does abrade and it is a kind of a periosteum it is not a kind of a bulbed. sent6: the Constable does bring if it dandles barbwire. sent7: The title reciprocates ascoma. sent8: if the Constable brings the frontbencher does abrade. sent9: if the Constable does not dandle barbwire it does not reciprocate meat. sent10: the frontbencher is a kind of a periosteum and spoofs blowjob. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Constable dandles barbwire.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the Constable brings.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the frontbencher abrades.; sent10 -> int3: the frontbencher is a periosteum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the frontbencher abrades and it is a periosteum.; sent5 -> int5: that the frontbencher is not a bulbed is right if it abrades and is a periosteum.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the frontbencher is not a bulbed.; sent2 -> int7: the frontbencher does not gnaw or it is a Cetoniidae or both if it is not a kind of a bulbed.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the frontbencher does not gnaw or is a kind of a Cetoniidae or both.; sent4 -> int9: there exists something such that it does reciprocate title.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the fact that the frontbencher does not gnaw or it is a kind of a Cetoniidae or both is not true.; int8 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the Constable does not dandle barbwire.; int12 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__