there is something such that if that it does obscure quiche and/or it is not a workbook is wrong it does not award butcher.
sent1: the dacoit is not a kind of a trash if that the fact that it is hydrostatics or it is not responsible or both is not incorrect is not true. sent2: there is something such that if that it either is auxinic or is not a Willebrand or both is incorrect then it does obscure intemperance. sent3: the dacoit accounts if that it is perinatal or is not a workbook or both is false. sent4: the dacoit is a Audubon if that it is a kind of a workbook or it is not a Mayday or both is not correct. sent5: the fact that the dacoit does award butcher is true if the fact that it obscures quiche and/or it is not a workbook is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of an obsidian and/or it is not appositional is incorrect that it is chirpy is right. sent7: if the fact that something does award Tocharian or it is not corporate or both is wrong then it is not a kind of a preserver. sent8: there is something such that if that that it is a scupper and/or it is a trash hold is false it is not a leucothoe. sent9: the dacoit is not Anglophilic if that it obscures quiche or it is not a kind of a Stenopelmatus or both is false. sent10: something does not obscure quiche if the fact that it is a driftwood or is not colorectal or both is not correct. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is a slaveholder or it is not Anglophilic or both does not hold it does not award bonus. sent12: if the fact that the dacoit does obscure quiche and/or it is not a workbook does not hold it does not award butcher. sent13: the dacoit does not award butcher if it does obscure quiche and/or it is not a workbook.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the dacoit does not obscure quiche is not wrong if the fact that it either is a kind of a driftwood or is not colorectal or both is false.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does obscure quiche and/or it is not a workbook is wrong it does not award butcher. ; $context$ = sent1: the dacoit is not a kind of a trash if that the fact that it is hydrostatics or it is not responsible or both is not incorrect is not true. sent2: there is something such that if that it either is auxinic or is not a Willebrand or both is incorrect then it does obscure intemperance. sent3: the dacoit accounts if that it is perinatal or is not a workbook or both is false. sent4: the dacoit is a Audubon if that it is a kind of a workbook or it is not a Mayday or both is not correct. sent5: the fact that the dacoit does award butcher is true if the fact that it obscures quiche and/or it is not a workbook is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of an obsidian and/or it is not appositional is incorrect that it is chirpy is right. sent7: if the fact that something does award Tocharian or it is not corporate or both is wrong then it is not a kind of a preserver. sent8: there is something such that if that that it is a scupper and/or it is a trash hold is false it is not a leucothoe. sent9: the dacoit is not Anglophilic if that it obscures quiche or it is not a kind of a Stenopelmatus or both is false. sent10: something does not obscure quiche if the fact that it is a driftwood or is not colorectal or both is not correct. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is a slaveholder or it is not Anglophilic or both does not hold it does not award bonus. sent12: if the fact that the dacoit does obscure quiche and/or it is not a workbook does not hold it does not award butcher. sent13: the dacoit does not award butcher if it does obscure quiche and/or it is not a workbook. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__