the crumbling blackjack does not occur.
sent1: if that the propagandist does not occur is not false then that the spread-eagling occurs but the companying Dubuque does not occur is not true. sent2: not the pompousness but the cirrocumulus occurs. sent3: the secreting stitchwort does not occur if that the pluralism does not occur and the diluvianness does not occur is not correct. sent4: that the tweezing tool does not occur hold. sent5: that the ungratefulness does not occur and the low-techness occurs prevents that the steadying occurs. sent6: that the pluralism does not occur and the diluvianness does not occur is not correct if the slowness occurs. sent7: that the Ephesiansness does not occur and the tweezing tool does not occur is wrong if the secreting stitchwort does not occur. sent8: if the mensalness does not occur then that the non-propagandistness and the non-pompousness occurs is not correct. sent9: that if that the tweezing civet does not occur and the K.E. does not occur is not correct then the tweezing civet happens is not incorrect. sent10: the secreting eventuality occurs if the fact that the secreting eventuality does not occur and the Ephesiansness does not occur does not hold. sent11: the non-xericness is caused by that the non-diluvianness and the reconstructing happens. sent12: that the tweezing nostrum does not occur and the fault does not occur is false if the ungratefulness does not occur. sent13: if the secreting eventuality does not occur the fact that the Split happens and the oviparousness occurs is not correct. sent14: if that the Ephesiansness does not occur and the tweezing tool does not occur is wrong the secreting eventuality does not occur. sent15: that the tweezing tool does not occur and the secreting stitchwort does not occur triggers that the secreting eventuality does not occur. sent16: that the Split does not occur and the grill does not occur prevents that the crumbling pressmark happens. sent17: if the oviparousness does not occur and the secreting eventuality happens then that the crumbling blackjack does not occur is true. sent18: the fact that that either the grilling occurs or the Split occurs or both results in that the oviparousness does not occur is not false. sent19: that that the tweezing tool does not occur and the secreting stitchwort does not occur is correct is brought about by that the diluvianness happens. sent20: that the secreting eventuality does not occur and the Ephesians does not occur does not hold if the tweezing tool does not occur. sent21: the hexadecimalness does not occur if the cultism and/or the companying pumice happens. sent22: that if the raying does not occur both the crumbling bristlegrass and the slowing happens is not wrong. sent23: the fact that the Split occurs is not false. sent24: the burdening happens.
sent23 -> int1: the grilling occurs and/or the Split occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the oviparousness does not occur.; sent20 & sent4 -> int3: that the secreting eventuality does not occur and the Ephesiansness does not occur is incorrect.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the secreting eventuality occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the oviparousness does not occur and the secreting eventuality occurs.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the crumbling blackjack occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the crumbling blackjack does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the propagandist does not occur is not false then that the spread-eagling occurs but the companying Dubuque does not occur is not true. sent2: not the pompousness but the cirrocumulus occurs. sent3: the secreting stitchwort does not occur if that the pluralism does not occur and the diluvianness does not occur is not correct. sent4: that the tweezing tool does not occur hold. sent5: that the ungratefulness does not occur and the low-techness occurs prevents that the steadying occurs. sent6: that the pluralism does not occur and the diluvianness does not occur is not correct if the slowness occurs. sent7: that the Ephesiansness does not occur and the tweezing tool does not occur is wrong if the secreting stitchwort does not occur. sent8: if the mensalness does not occur then that the non-propagandistness and the non-pompousness occurs is not correct. sent9: that if that the tweezing civet does not occur and the K.E. does not occur is not correct then the tweezing civet happens is not incorrect. sent10: the secreting eventuality occurs if the fact that the secreting eventuality does not occur and the Ephesiansness does not occur does not hold. sent11: the non-xericness is caused by that the non-diluvianness and the reconstructing happens. sent12: that the tweezing nostrum does not occur and the fault does not occur is false if the ungratefulness does not occur. sent13: if the secreting eventuality does not occur the fact that the Split happens and the oviparousness occurs is not correct. sent14: if that the Ephesiansness does not occur and the tweezing tool does not occur is wrong the secreting eventuality does not occur. sent15: that the tweezing tool does not occur and the secreting stitchwort does not occur triggers that the secreting eventuality does not occur. sent16: that the Split does not occur and the grill does not occur prevents that the crumbling pressmark happens. sent17: if the oviparousness does not occur and the secreting eventuality happens then that the crumbling blackjack does not occur is true. sent18: the fact that that either the grilling occurs or the Split occurs or both results in that the oviparousness does not occur is not false. sent19: that that the tweezing tool does not occur and the secreting stitchwort does not occur is correct is brought about by that the diluvianness happens. sent20: that the secreting eventuality does not occur and the Ephesians does not occur does not hold if the tweezing tool does not occur. sent21: the hexadecimalness does not occur if the cultism and/or the companying pumice happens. sent22: that if the raying does not occur both the crumbling bristlegrass and the slowing happens is not wrong. sent23: the fact that the Split occurs is not false. sent24: the burdening happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 -> int1: the grilling occurs and/or the Split occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the oviparousness does not occur.; sent20 & sent4 -> int3: that the secreting eventuality does not occur and the Ephesiansness does not occur is incorrect.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the secreting eventuality occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the oviparousness does not occur and the secreting eventuality occurs.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__