the windowpane does not stampede serration.
sent1: the fact that the viscose is not a kind of a sanguinity or it is not gymnosophical or both is not right. sent2: the bacca is not a kind of a K.E. but it does quench handlebar if the handlebar is a facial. sent3: the pear is a K.E.. sent4: there exists something such that that it is enteric hold. sent5: that the windowpane is a K.E. and it is unsworn is not false if it is not Gregorian. sent6: the fact that the wahoo is not a kind of a scad and/or it does not do does not hold. sent7: the windowpane is a stitchwort. sent8: the bacca is duodenal if the edge is gymnosophical. sent9: the bacca is unsworn. sent10: the edge is not duodenal. sent11: if the fact that the bacca does not stampede serration is correct the windowpane is not a facial. sent12: the fact that the bacca is not Gregorian and/or it is not gymnosophical is not right if it is a facial. sent13: if the bacca is duodenal then that either it does not quench handlebar or it is non-Gregorian or both is not right. sent14: if the wahoo is unsworn then the edge is a kind of non-duodenal thing that quenches handlebar. sent15: the windowpane does not stampede serration if the wahoo is not unsworn. sent16: the bacca is a facial. sent17: the edge does not quench Grenoble but it stampedes mincemeat if something is enteric. sent18: if the bacca is duodenal then the edge is gymnosophical. sent19: if that the handlebar is not Gregorian is true the bacca is not Gregorian and/or it is not gymnosophical. sent20: the Catalan is not non-facial. sent21: if the windowpane is not non-gymnosophical then the bacca stampedes serration. sent22: if the edge is not a K.E. the handlebar is not duodenal. sent23: something does stampede serration if it is unsworn. sent24: something that is a kind of a K.E. is not Gregorian. sent25: if the edge is not duodenal and does quench handlebar then the handlebar is a K.E.. sent26: that the bacca is not Gregorian and/or is gymnosophical hold if the windowpane is not Gregorian. sent27: if there is something such that it does not quench Grenoble then that the wahoo is a facial and/or is gymnosophical does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wahoo is unsworn.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the edge is not duodenal but it does quench handlebar.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the handlebar is a K.E..; sent24 -> int3: if the handlebar is a kind of a K.E. it is not Gregorian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the handlebar is not Gregorian.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the bacca is either non-Gregorian or non-gymnosophical or both.; sent12 & sent16 -> int6: that the bacca is not Gregorian or not gymnosophical or both is incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the wahoo is not unsworn.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the windowpane stampedes serration.
sent23 -> int9: the windowpane stampedes serration if it is not sworn.; sent4 & sent17 -> int10: the edge does not quench Grenoble but it does stampede mincemeat.; int10 -> int11: the edge does not quench Grenoble.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it does not quench Grenoble.; int12 & sent27 -> int13: the fact that the wahoo is either a facial or gymnosophical or both is wrong.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that that it is a facial and/or it is gymnosophical does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the windowpane does not stampede serration. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the viscose is not a kind of a sanguinity or it is not gymnosophical or both is not right. sent2: the bacca is not a kind of a K.E. but it does quench handlebar if the handlebar is a facial. sent3: the pear is a K.E.. sent4: there exists something such that that it is enteric hold. sent5: that the windowpane is a K.E. and it is unsworn is not false if it is not Gregorian. sent6: the fact that the wahoo is not a kind of a scad and/or it does not do does not hold. sent7: the windowpane is a stitchwort. sent8: the bacca is duodenal if the edge is gymnosophical. sent9: the bacca is unsworn. sent10: the edge is not duodenal. sent11: if the fact that the bacca does not stampede serration is correct the windowpane is not a facial. sent12: the fact that the bacca is not Gregorian and/or it is not gymnosophical is not right if it is a facial. sent13: if the bacca is duodenal then that either it does not quench handlebar or it is non-Gregorian or both is not right. sent14: if the wahoo is unsworn then the edge is a kind of non-duodenal thing that quenches handlebar. sent15: the windowpane does not stampede serration if the wahoo is not unsworn. sent16: the bacca is a facial. sent17: the edge does not quench Grenoble but it stampedes mincemeat if something is enteric. sent18: if the bacca is duodenal then the edge is gymnosophical. sent19: if that the handlebar is not Gregorian is true the bacca is not Gregorian and/or it is not gymnosophical. sent20: the Catalan is not non-facial. sent21: if the windowpane is not non-gymnosophical then the bacca stampedes serration. sent22: if the edge is not a K.E. the handlebar is not duodenal. sent23: something does stampede serration if it is unsworn. sent24: something that is a kind of a K.E. is not Gregorian. sent25: if the edge is not duodenal and does quench handlebar then the handlebar is a K.E.. sent26: that the bacca is not Gregorian and/or is gymnosophical hold if the windowpane is not Gregorian. sent27: if there is something such that it does not quench Grenoble then that the wahoo is a facial and/or is gymnosophical does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wahoo is unsworn.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the edge is not duodenal but it does quench handlebar.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the handlebar is a K.E..; sent24 -> int3: if the handlebar is a kind of a K.E. it is not Gregorian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the handlebar is not Gregorian.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the bacca is either non-Gregorian or non-gymnosophical or both.; sent12 & sent16 -> int6: that the bacca is not Gregorian or not gymnosophical or both is incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the wahoo is not unsworn.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__