the ohmage stows blended but it does not embrown shipper.
sent1: the greyhound is not a carangid. sent2: if something is a contextualism it is Modern. sent3: the aldose is both a trump and not mandibulofacial. sent4: the aldose does not unclothe pith. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Condorcet and it does not unclothe pith is not true. sent6: if the aldose is not Modern then the fact that that the fact that the greyhound is a contextualism and/or carangid is right is wrong is not incorrect. sent7: that the ohmage does stow blended and does embrown shipper is not correct. sent8: the fact that the ohmage does stow blended but it does not embrown shipper is not correct if the shipper is not a kind of a procession. sent9: the greyhound is a Condorcet. sent10: if the ohmage is a atropine the fact that it stows blended is not incorrect. sent11: if something does embrown Novial then the ohmage does unclothe Fischer. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is a Condorcet and it does not unclothe pith does not hold the aldose is a atropine. sent13: the shipper does trump if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a procession and a carangid is not right. sent14: if there is something such that that the fact that it is a contextualism and/or is a carangid hold does not hold the fact that the shipper is not a procession hold. sent15: something is a contextualism and/or is carangid. sent16: there is something such that that it is both not a procession and carangid is not right. sent17: the aldose is not Modern if it trumps and is a atropine. sent18: the shipper is a contextualism.
sent5 & sent12 -> int1: the aldose is a kind of a atropine.; sent3 -> int2: the aldose is a trump.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the aldose is both a trump and a atropine.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the aldose is not Modern.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the greyhound is a contextualism and/or it is a kind of a carangid is not correct.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it is a kind of a contextualism and/or it is a carangid is not correct.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the shipper is not a procession.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that that it is a Gnaphalium or unclothes kola or both does not hold.
sent2 -> int8: if the shipper is a contextualism then that it is Modern is not wrong.; int8 & sent18 -> int9: the shipper is Modern.; sent16 & sent13 -> int10: the fact that the shipper is a trump is not wrong.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the shipper is Modern and it is a kind of a trump.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is Modern a trump.;
$hypothesis$ = the ohmage stows blended but it does not embrown shipper. ; $context$ = sent1: the greyhound is not a carangid. sent2: if something is a contextualism it is Modern. sent3: the aldose is both a trump and not mandibulofacial. sent4: the aldose does not unclothe pith. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Condorcet and it does not unclothe pith is not true. sent6: if the aldose is not Modern then the fact that that the fact that the greyhound is a contextualism and/or carangid is right is wrong is not incorrect. sent7: that the ohmage does stow blended and does embrown shipper is not correct. sent8: the fact that the ohmage does stow blended but it does not embrown shipper is not correct if the shipper is not a kind of a procession. sent9: the greyhound is a Condorcet. sent10: if the ohmage is a atropine the fact that it stows blended is not incorrect. sent11: if something does embrown Novial then the ohmage does unclothe Fischer. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is a Condorcet and it does not unclothe pith does not hold the aldose is a atropine. sent13: the shipper does trump if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a procession and a carangid is not right. sent14: if there is something such that that the fact that it is a contextualism and/or is a carangid hold does not hold the fact that the shipper is not a procession hold. sent15: something is a contextualism and/or is carangid. sent16: there is something such that that it is both not a procession and carangid is not right. sent17: the aldose is not Modern if it trumps and is a atropine. sent18: the shipper is a contextualism. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent12 -> int1: the aldose is a kind of a atropine.; sent3 -> int2: the aldose is a trump.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the aldose is both a trump and a atropine.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the aldose is not Modern.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the greyhound is a contextualism and/or it is a kind of a carangid is not correct.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it is a kind of a contextualism and/or it is a carangid is not correct.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the shipper is not a procession.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__