the night-line is a Weil and it is a gracefulness.
sent1: there is something such that it dilapidates minibar. sent2: if the Gable is a gracefulness that is a kind of a Weil then the nightwear does not dilapidate minibar. sent3: if something is not a gracefulness and it is not unexpansive it is not a kind of a Weil. sent4: the fact that something does dilapidate minibar and it is a kind of a medusa does not hold if it is not a akaryocyte. sent5: the shackle is not affixal but it is a kind of a Watergate if the nightwear does not uncork Gempylus. sent6: the Gable is not a kind of a medusa and does dilapidate minibar. sent7: if that the fact that something is not a lambrequin and it does not dilapidate night-line is correct is not correct it is not a Weil. sent8: if the shackle is not a lambrequin then that the nightwear is not a lambrequin and it does not dilapidate night-line is wrong. sent9: the night-line is not a eye-catcher if something does not narrate Benzoin. sent10: the shackle is not a kind of a lambrequin if the Gable does dilapidate minibar and is a kind of a akaryocyte. sent11: the night-line is a Weil and it is a gracefulness if the nightwear is not a Weil. sent12: there is something such that it is unexpansive. sent13: the shackle does not dilapidate night-line. sent14: if something is unexpansive the Gable is a akaryocyte. sent15: the termite is a lambrequin and is a medusa if the Gable does not dilapidate minibar. sent16: if the Gable is a lambrequin that does not dilapidate night-line it is not a kind of a akaryocyte. sent17: that something does not dilapidate night-line and is not a akaryocyte is not right if it is not a Weil. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a eye-catcher then the fact that the nightwear is a prod and does not uncork Gempylus is not wrong. sent19: if the shackle is not affixal the Gable is not a gracefulness and it is expansive. sent20: there is something such that that it does not narrate Benzoin hold. sent21: if something is not a medusa then that it is a Weil and is a gracefulness does not hold.
sent6 -> int1: the Gable dilapidates minibar.; sent12 & sent14 -> int2: the Gable is a akaryocyte.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Gable does dilapidate minibar and is a akaryocyte.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the shackle is not a kind of a lambrequin.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the nightwear is not a lambrequin and does not dilapidate night-line is not correct.; sent7 -> int6: the nightwear is not a Weil if that it is not a lambrequin and does not dilapidate night-line is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the nightwear is not a Weil.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the termite is a lambrequin.
sent17 -> int8: if the Gable is not a Weil that it does not dilapidate night-line and it is not a kind of a akaryocyte is wrong.; sent3 -> int9: if the Gable is not a gracefulness and it is not unexpansive it is not a kind of a Weil.; sent20 & sent9 -> int10: the night-line is not a eye-catcher.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is not a eye-catcher.; int11 & sent18 -> int12: the fact that the nightwear prods but it does not uncork Gempylus is not incorrect.; int12 -> int13: the nightwear does not uncork Gempylus.; sent5 & int13 -> int14: the shackle is non-affixal a Watergate.; int14 -> int15: the shackle is not affixal.; sent19 & int15 -> int16: the Gable is both not a gracefulness and not unexpansive.; int9 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the Gable is not a Weil is right.; int8 & int17 -> int18: that the Gable does not dilapidate night-line and is not a kind of a akaryocyte is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the night-line is a Weil and it is a gracefulness. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it dilapidates minibar. sent2: if the Gable is a gracefulness that is a kind of a Weil then the nightwear does not dilapidate minibar. sent3: if something is not a gracefulness and it is not unexpansive it is not a kind of a Weil. sent4: the fact that something does dilapidate minibar and it is a kind of a medusa does not hold if it is not a akaryocyte. sent5: the shackle is not affixal but it is a kind of a Watergate if the nightwear does not uncork Gempylus. sent6: the Gable is not a kind of a medusa and does dilapidate minibar. sent7: if that the fact that something is not a lambrequin and it does not dilapidate night-line is correct is not correct it is not a Weil. sent8: if the shackle is not a lambrequin then that the nightwear is not a lambrequin and it does not dilapidate night-line is wrong. sent9: the night-line is not a eye-catcher if something does not narrate Benzoin. sent10: the shackle is not a kind of a lambrequin if the Gable does dilapidate minibar and is a kind of a akaryocyte. sent11: the night-line is a Weil and it is a gracefulness if the nightwear is not a Weil. sent12: there is something such that it is unexpansive. sent13: the shackle does not dilapidate night-line. sent14: if something is unexpansive the Gable is a akaryocyte. sent15: the termite is a lambrequin and is a medusa if the Gable does not dilapidate minibar. sent16: if the Gable is a lambrequin that does not dilapidate night-line it is not a kind of a akaryocyte. sent17: that something does not dilapidate night-line and is not a akaryocyte is not right if it is not a Weil. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a eye-catcher then the fact that the nightwear is a prod and does not uncork Gempylus is not wrong. sent19: if the shackle is not affixal the Gable is not a gracefulness and it is expansive. sent20: there is something such that that it does not narrate Benzoin hold. sent21: if something is not a medusa then that it is a Weil and is a gracefulness does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the Gable dilapidates minibar.; sent12 & sent14 -> int2: the Gable is a akaryocyte.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Gable does dilapidate minibar and is a akaryocyte.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the shackle is not a kind of a lambrequin.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the nightwear is not a lambrequin and does not dilapidate night-line is not correct.; sent7 -> int6: the nightwear is not a Weil if that it is not a lambrequin and does not dilapidate night-line is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the nightwear is not a Weil.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__