there exists something such that if it strips loveseat then it is not a rue.
sent1: if something that commands former does strip loveseat then the fact that it is a kind of a rue is correct. sent2: if the hemerobiid does risk leone then it is a rue. sent3: something is auxetic if it commands former. sent4: the hemerobiid is a rue if it commands former and strips loveseat. sent5: the hemerobiid commands former and it is a kind of a Adar. sent6: the hemerobiid is a Adar and is kafkaesque. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a Adar then it does strip loveseat. sent8: the scofflaw commands former and it is a Adar if the fact that the hemerobiid does not strip loveseat is right. sent9: if something commands former and does strip loveseat then it is not a rue. sent10: the hemerobiid stables gazebo and it is a rue. sent11: if the zymase is not non-Cuban and it does strip loveseat then it is a kind of an outrageousness. sent12: that the hemerobiid is a offensiveness is not false. sent13: the dominus does strip loveseat. sent14: if the Berbers blocks and it does strip loveseat then that it is not a fruiterer is correct.
sent5 -> int1: the hemerobiid does command former.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hemerobiid strips loveseat.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hemerobiid commands former and does strip loveseat.; sent9 -> int3: the hemerobiid is not a rue if it commands former and does strip loveseat.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hemerobiid is not a rue.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: if the hemerobiid does strip loveseat then it is not a rue.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the scofflaw is auxetic and it is a discomfiture.
sent3 -> int6: the scofflaw is auxetic if it does command former.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it strips loveseat then it is not a rue. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that commands former does strip loveseat then the fact that it is a kind of a rue is correct. sent2: if the hemerobiid does risk leone then it is a rue. sent3: something is auxetic if it commands former. sent4: the hemerobiid is a rue if it commands former and strips loveseat. sent5: the hemerobiid commands former and it is a kind of a Adar. sent6: the hemerobiid is a Adar and is kafkaesque. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a Adar then it does strip loveseat. sent8: the scofflaw commands former and it is a Adar if the fact that the hemerobiid does not strip loveseat is right. sent9: if something commands former and does strip loveseat then it is not a rue. sent10: the hemerobiid stables gazebo and it is a rue. sent11: if the zymase is not non-Cuban and it does strip loveseat then it is a kind of an outrageousness. sent12: that the hemerobiid is a offensiveness is not false. sent13: the dominus does strip loveseat. sent14: if the Berbers blocks and it does strip loveseat then that it is not a fruiterer is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the hemerobiid does command former.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hemerobiid strips loveseat.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hemerobiid commands former and does strip loveseat.; sent9 -> int3: the hemerobiid is not a rue if it commands former and does strip loveseat.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hemerobiid is not a rue.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: if the hemerobiid does strip loveseat then it is not a rue.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__