the rambutan is not a Synchytrium.
sent1: The dik-dik does not heel maxilla. sent2: something is not binaural if it is not a synovium. sent3: a non-binaural thing heels dik-dik and is a Synchytrium. sent4: if the lumberjack either is not perceptive or does deflate or both the fact that the twinberry is binaural is correct. sent5: the rambutan is not a kind of a Synchytrium if the participant is not a speakerphone and it is not a synovium. sent6: the maxilla does not heel dik-dik. sent7: the participant is not a speakerphone. sent8: if the twinberry is binaural the fact that the maxilla does heel dik-dik is not incorrect. sent9: if there exists something such that that it either is not perceptive or deflates or both does not hold then the participant is not a kind of a synovium.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the lumberjack is not perceptive or it deflates or both.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the twinberry is binaural.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the maxilla heels dik-dik.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the lumberjack is not perceptive and/or it does deflate is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is unperceptive or it deflates or both is false.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the participant is not a synovium.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the participant is not a speakerphone and is not a kind of a synovium.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the rambutan is a kind of a Synchytrium.
sent3 -> int8: if the rambutan is not binaural then it does heel dik-dik and is a Synchytrium.; sent2 -> int9: if the rambutan is not a synovium then it is not binaural.;
$hypothesis$ = the rambutan is not a Synchytrium. ; $context$ = sent1: The dik-dik does not heel maxilla. sent2: something is not binaural if it is not a synovium. sent3: a non-binaural thing heels dik-dik and is a Synchytrium. sent4: if the lumberjack either is not perceptive or does deflate or both the fact that the twinberry is binaural is correct. sent5: the rambutan is not a kind of a Synchytrium if the participant is not a speakerphone and it is not a synovium. sent6: the maxilla does not heel dik-dik. sent7: the participant is not a speakerphone. sent8: if the twinberry is binaural the fact that the maxilla does heel dik-dik is not incorrect. sent9: if there exists something such that that it either is not perceptive or deflates or both does not hold then the participant is not a kind of a synovium. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the lumberjack is not perceptive or it deflates or both.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the twinberry is binaural.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the maxilla heels dik-dik.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the lumberjack is not perceptive and/or it does deflate is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is unperceptive or it deflates or both is false.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the participant is not a synovium.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the participant is not a speakerphone and is not a kind of a synovium.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__