there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Paleozoic the fact that it is not a kind of a hippoboscid and/or does not bandy is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is Paleozoic then it is a hippoboscid. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Paleozoic that it is a hippoboscid and/or it does not bandy is not correct. sent3: that there is something such that if it immortalizes timekeeper that either it is not hemispheric or it does not immortalize Ernst or both does not hold is correct. sent4: there is something such that if that it immortalizes iceberg is correct then that either it does not squint or it does not permute axis or both does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a dowser is not incorrect the fact that it is not a Hartley or it is not a telemeter or both is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a Paleozoic then it is not a kind of a hippoboscid and/or does not bandy. sent7: if the Fez is a kind of a Paleozoic then that it is not a hippoboscid and/or it does not bandy is not right. sent8: the fact that the Fez is not a hippoboscid and/or does bandy does not hold if it is a Paleozoic. sent9: there is something such that if it does crack then that it is not an audition or is not a statics or both does not hold. sent10: if something does immortalize inconsistency then that it is non-Paleozoic and/or it is not myelic is incorrect. sent11: if that the Fez is a kind of a Paleozoic is true it is not a kind of a hippoboscid and/or it does not bandy. sent12: the fact that the Fez does not checkmate macon or it is not a sportswriter or both does not hold if it is a Sirius. sent13: if the Fez does crank then that it is not a hippoboscid and/or is not a Zagreb is not right. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Paleozoic then the fact that either it is not a hippoboscid or it bandies or both is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it deduces pomfret then the fact that it is not a Cockney or it does not checkmate macon or both is not true. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Paleozoic it bandies. sent17: if the macon is a roofed the fact that it is not an hour or it does not bandy or both is false. sent18: the Fez is a hippoboscid if it is a Paleozoic. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a alastrim is not incorrect the fact that it is not a renter and/or is not exculpatory is false.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
that either the female is not a kind of a Paleozoic or it is not myelic or both is not right if that it does immortalize inconsistency is not incorrect.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Paleozoic the fact that it is not a kind of a hippoboscid and/or does not bandy is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is Paleozoic then it is a hippoboscid. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Paleozoic that it is a hippoboscid and/or it does not bandy is not correct. sent3: that there is something such that if it immortalizes timekeeper that either it is not hemispheric or it does not immortalize Ernst or both does not hold is correct. sent4: there is something such that if that it immortalizes iceberg is correct then that either it does not squint or it does not permute axis or both does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a dowser is not incorrect the fact that it is not a Hartley or it is not a telemeter or both is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a Paleozoic then it is not a kind of a hippoboscid and/or does not bandy. sent7: if the Fez is a kind of a Paleozoic then that it is not a hippoboscid and/or it does not bandy is not right. sent8: the fact that the Fez is not a hippoboscid and/or does bandy does not hold if it is a Paleozoic. sent9: there is something such that if it does crack then that it is not an audition or is not a statics or both does not hold. sent10: if something does immortalize inconsistency then that it is non-Paleozoic and/or it is not myelic is incorrect. sent11: if that the Fez is a kind of a Paleozoic is true it is not a kind of a hippoboscid and/or it does not bandy. sent12: the fact that the Fez does not checkmate macon or it is not a sportswriter or both does not hold if it is a Sirius. sent13: if the Fez does crank then that it is not a hippoboscid and/or is not a Zagreb is not right. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Paleozoic then the fact that either it is not a hippoboscid or it bandies or both is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it deduces pomfret then the fact that it is not a Cockney or it does not checkmate macon or both is not true. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Paleozoic it bandies. sent17: if the macon is a roofed the fact that it is not an hour or it does not bandy or both is false. sent18: the Fez is a hippoboscid if it is a Paleozoic. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a alastrim is not incorrect the fact that it is not a renter and/or is not exculpatory is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__