either the repeating does not occur or the digitalness occurs or both.
sent1: the achromatinicness does not occur. sent2: the addictiveness does not occur and/or the Eritreanness happens. sent3: if the abusing FTC occurs then the excuse occurs. sent4: if the protestation occurs that both the unchasteness and the ladling khan occurs does not hold. sent5: the abusing FTC happens. sent6: the pontificating does not occur and/or the hopping electrosurgery happens. sent7: if the protestation happens that the unchasteness does not occur and the ladling khan happens is wrong. sent8: the fact that both the unchasteness and the ladling khan occurs is wrong. sent9: the excuse does not occur if the protestation does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the protestation does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the excusing does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the excuse occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the protestation happens is true.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that both the chasteness and the ladling khan occurs does not hold.;
the fact that the repeating does not occur or the digitalness happens or both is false.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = either the repeating does not occur or the digitalness occurs or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the achromatinicness does not occur. sent2: the addictiveness does not occur and/or the Eritreanness happens. sent3: if the abusing FTC occurs then the excuse occurs. sent4: if the protestation occurs that both the unchasteness and the ladling khan occurs does not hold. sent5: the abusing FTC happens. sent6: the pontificating does not occur and/or the hopping electrosurgery happens. sent7: if the protestation happens that the unchasteness does not occur and the ladling khan happens is wrong. sent8: the fact that both the unchasteness and the ladling khan occurs is wrong. sent9: the excuse does not occur if the protestation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the protestation does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the excusing does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the excuse occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the protestation happens is true.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that both the chasteness and the ladling khan occurs does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__