the annualry is a kind of non-tearless thing that does resubmit monotony if the inhalation inks.
sent1: the fact that the annualry is tearless is correct. sent2: if something is inductive and/or it does resubmit monotony it is not a Sparidae. sent3: the annualry inks. sent4: the fact that the inhalation deposes Peridiniidae is not wrong if the Marsh is a kind of a Sparidae. sent5: the annualry is inductive if it is not tearless and resubmits monotony. sent6: if something resubmits wahoo and/or deposes Peridiniidae then it does not ink. sent7: the inhalation is not an ink if it resubmits wahoo. sent8: the annualry is tearless and resubmits monotony. sent9: that the inhalation does not ink but it is inductive is false. sent10: if the fact that the annualry is tearless and it does resubmit monotony is not correct then it is inductive. sent11: the Marsh is a Sparidae if the annualry is inductive. sent12: the annualry does resubmit monotony. sent13: if something does resubmit wahoo then it is not an ink. sent14: if the annualry does not resubmit monotony then it is inductive. sent15: the annualry is tearless and it does resubmit monotony if that the inhalation is not a kind of an ink does not hold. sent16: the annualry does resubmit monotony if the inhalation is a kind of an ink. sent17: the Marsh is an ink. sent18: the lancet is an ink. sent19: if that something is not a Sparidae is correct then it is not a kaon and it is categoric.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the annualry is not tearless but it resubmits monotony does not hold.; sent6 -> int1: the inhalation does not ink if it resubmits wahoo and/or it deposes Peridiniidae.;
the inhalation is not a kaon but categoric.
sent19 -> int2: if the inhalation is not a Sparidae it is not a kaon but categoric.;
$hypothesis$ = the annualry is a kind of non-tearless thing that does resubmit monotony if the inhalation inks. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the annualry is tearless is correct. sent2: if something is inductive and/or it does resubmit monotony it is not a Sparidae. sent3: the annualry inks. sent4: the fact that the inhalation deposes Peridiniidae is not wrong if the Marsh is a kind of a Sparidae. sent5: the annualry is inductive if it is not tearless and resubmits monotony. sent6: if something resubmits wahoo and/or deposes Peridiniidae then it does not ink. sent7: the inhalation is not an ink if it resubmits wahoo. sent8: the annualry is tearless and resubmits monotony. sent9: that the inhalation does not ink but it is inductive is false. sent10: if the fact that the annualry is tearless and it does resubmit monotony is not correct then it is inductive. sent11: the Marsh is a Sparidae if the annualry is inductive. sent12: the annualry does resubmit monotony. sent13: if something does resubmit wahoo then it is not an ink. sent14: if the annualry does not resubmit monotony then it is inductive. sent15: the annualry is tearless and it does resubmit monotony if that the inhalation is not a kind of an ink does not hold. sent16: the annualry does resubmit monotony if the inhalation is a kind of an ink. sent17: the Marsh is an ink. sent18: the lancet is an ink. sent19: if that something is not a Sparidae is correct then it is not a kaon and it is categoric. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the annualry is not tearless but it resubmits monotony does not hold.; sent6 -> int1: the inhalation does not ink if it resubmits wahoo and/or it deposes Peridiniidae.; __UNKNOWN__