there exists something such that that it does excise binder and it is not a Sana is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the geezer excises binder and is a Sana does not hold. sent2: if something is echoic and it is a kind of a genipap it is not hermeneutic. sent3: the geezer is not nonechoic if it is testate. sent4: that something excises binder and is not a Sana is not true if it is not hermeneutic. sent5: the geezer is a kind of a genipap that stigmatizes Gielgud. sent6: something stigmatizes Aras. sent7: the geezer stigmatizes Gielgud. sent8: if there exists something such that it does stigmatize Aras the fact that the geezer is feudatory and Solomonic is false. sent9: the fact that the geezer is a kind of feudatory thing that is not Solomonic is not correct if there exists something such that it stigmatizes Aras. sent10: if something is antidotal then it is testate. sent11: that the geezer does excise binder and it is a kind of a Sana is not true if it is not hermeneutic. sent12: if the geezer is not a genus the fact that it is a kind of a genipap that is not hematologic does not hold. sent13: there is something such that that it excises binder and is a Sana is false. sent14: there is something such that it does excise binder and it is not a Sana. sent15: if something is testate then the fact that the mink is a Pycnanthemum but it is not a misuse is not correct. sent16: the fact that the geezer is a newswoman that is not hermeneutic is wrong. sent17: that the geezer is not antidotal is not true if that it is feudatory thing that is not Solomonic is not right. sent18: the fact that the geezer is feudatory and it is Solomonic does not hold. sent19: if the geezer is Solomonic it is antidotal. sent20: the fact that something excises binder and it is a Sana is wrong if it is non-hermeneutic.
sent6 & sent9 -> int1: that the geezer is feudatory and is not Solomonic is not right.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the geezer is antidotal.; sent10 -> int3: the geezer is testate if that it is antidotal is true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the geezer is testate.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the geezer is echoic.; sent5 -> int6: the geezer is a kind of a genipap.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the geezer is a kind of echoic thing that is a genipap.; sent2 -> int8: the geezer is not hermeneutic if it is echoic and it is a genipap.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the geezer is not hermeneutic.; sent4 -> int10: that the geezer excises binder but it is not a Sana is not true if it is not hermeneutic.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the fact that the geezer excises binder but it is not a kind of a Sana is right does not hold.; int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does excise binder and it is not a Sana is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the geezer excises binder and is a Sana does not hold. sent2: if something is echoic and it is a kind of a genipap it is not hermeneutic. sent3: the geezer is not nonechoic if it is testate. sent4: that something excises binder and is not a Sana is not true if it is not hermeneutic. sent5: the geezer is a kind of a genipap that stigmatizes Gielgud. sent6: something stigmatizes Aras. sent7: the geezer stigmatizes Gielgud. sent8: if there exists something such that it does stigmatize Aras the fact that the geezer is feudatory and Solomonic is false. sent9: the fact that the geezer is a kind of feudatory thing that is not Solomonic is not correct if there exists something such that it stigmatizes Aras. sent10: if something is antidotal then it is testate. sent11: that the geezer does excise binder and it is a kind of a Sana is not true if it is not hermeneutic. sent12: if the geezer is not a genus the fact that it is a kind of a genipap that is not hematologic does not hold. sent13: there is something such that that it excises binder and is a Sana is false. sent14: there is something such that it does excise binder and it is not a Sana. sent15: if something is testate then the fact that the mink is a Pycnanthemum but it is not a misuse is not correct. sent16: the fact that the geezer is a newswoman that is not hermeneutic is wrong. sent17: that the geezer is not antidotal is not true if that it is feudatory thing that is not Solomonic is not right. sent18: the fact that the geezer is feudatory and it is Solomonic does not hold. sent19: if the geezer is Solomonic it is antidotal. sent20: the fact that something excises binder and it is a Sana is wrong if it is non-hermeneutic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent9 -> int1: that the geezer is feudatory and is not Solomonic is not right.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the geezer is antidotal.; sent10 -> int3: the geezer is testate if that it is antidotal is true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the geezer is testate.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the geezer is echoic.; sent5 -> int6: the geezer is a kind of a genipap.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the geezer is a kind of echoic thing that is a genipap.; sent2 -> int8: the geezer is not hermeneutic if it is echoic and it is a genipap.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the geezer is not hermeneutic.; sent4 -> int10: that the geezer excises binder but it is not a Sana is not true if it is not hermeneutic.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the fact that the geezer excises binder but it is not a kind of a Sana is right does not hold.; int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__