the fact that either the DSL is a Whittle or it is fibrillose or both is false.
sent1: the epee does shimmer. sent2: the haymaker is not fibrillose. sent3: that something is not a kind of a shimmer but it is a kind of a Franciscan is not correct if it is an idolatry. sent4: if the haymaker shimmers then the epee is fibrillose. sent5: if the epee is non-dormant thing that does dominate Tetrao then it does not shimmer. sent6: if the loom is not a Laughton that it does not symbolize suslik and is a lime is not correct. sent7: the haymaker is not dormant if the epee is not dormant. sent8: the loom is not a Laughton. sent9: the DSL is fibrillose if the epee is fibrillose. sent10: if the haymaker is not a Whittle the fact that the DSL either is a kind of a Whittle or is fibrillose or both is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epee is non-dormant and dominates Tetrao.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the epee is not a shimmer.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the epee is not dormant but it dominates Tetrao is incorrect.;
the DSL is a Whittle or it is fibrillose or both.
sent3 -> int4: the fact that the vulture is not a shimmer but Franciscan is not right if it is an idolatry.; sent6 & sent8 -> int5: that the loom does not symbolize suslik but it limes does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it does not symbolize suslik and it does lime is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the DSL is a Whittle or it is fibrillose or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the epee does shimmer. sent2: the haymaker is not fibrillose. sent3: that something is not a kind of a shimmer but it is a kind of a Franciscan is not correct if it is an idolatry. sent4: if the haymaker shimmers then the epee is fibrillose. sent5: if the epee is non-dormant thing that does dominate Tetrao then it does not shimmer. sent6: if the loom is not a Laughton that it does not symbolize suslik and is a lime is not correct. sent7: the haymaker is not dormant if the epee is not dormant. sent8: the loom is not a Laughton. sent9: the DSL is fibrillose if the epee is fibrillose. sent10: if the haymaker is not a Whittle the fact that the DSL either is a kind of a Whittle or is fibrillose or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epee is non-dormant and dominates Tetrao.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the epee is not a shimmer.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the epee is not dormant but it dominates Tetrao is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__