that there exists something such that if it is anatropous that it does not memorialize mutilator and is a cetacean is false is not true.
sent1: there is something such that if it is anatropous the fact that it does memorialize mutilator and is a cetacean is not true. sent2: if something is an outbreak then the fact that it is both a state and a orchestrator is false. sent3: if something is periodontics the fact that it is both a dewberry and an antagonism is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the aphakic is a cartwheel and it wrestles Herrick does not hold if it is anatropous. sent5: the fact that something does not memorialize mutilator and is a kind of a cetacean is not right if that it is anatropous is correct. sent6: there is something such that if it does deliquesce that it is not anasarcous and memorializes cybercrime does not hold. sent7: that something is both a sadhe and imperial is incorrect if it is a yoke. sent8: there exists something such that if it is an overabundance then that it is not a Toda and it does memorialize trigram does not hold. sent9: if something blues Horne then that it does not wrestle sporophore and it does lighten is wrong. sent10: that the Ovral is not awake but it does memorialize ecoterrorism is incorrect if it powders connection.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the Ovral does not memorialize mutilator but it is a cetacean is not right if the fact that it is anatropous is not wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is anatropous that it does not memorialize mutilator and is a cetacean is false is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is anatropous the fact that it does memorialize mutilator and is a cetacean is not true. sent2: if something is an outbreak then the fact that it is both a state and a orchestrator is false. sent3: if something is periodontics the fact that it is both a dewberry and an antagonism is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the aphakic is a cartwheel and it wrestles Herrick does not hold if it is anatropous. sent5: the fact that something does not memorialize mutilator and is a kind of a cetacean is not right if that it is anatropous is correct. sent6: there is something such that if it does deliquesce that it is not anasarcous and memorializes cybercrime does not hold. sent7: that something is both a sadhe and imperial is incorrect if it is a yoke. sent8: there exists something such that if it is an overabundance then that it is not a Toda and it does memorialize trigram does not hold. sent9: if something blues Horne then that it does not wrestle sporophore and it does lighten is wrong. sent10: that the Ovral is not awake but it does memorialize ecoterrorism is incorrect if it powders connection. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the Ovral does not memorialize mutilator but it is a cetacean is not right if the fact that it is anatropous is not wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__