the miconazole does not labor Herbart.
sent1: if something does spend ballpark then it is a kind of a muckraker. sent2: the advection is both not a pickings and not cubital if the anathema does not labor Herbart. sent3: if the aphakic is a muckraker the bethel spends ballpark. sent4: that if the bethel spends ballpark then the advection is a kind of a statics is not wrong. sent5: if there is something such that it is a kind of non-cubital a sojourn then the bronco is nonpsychoactive. sent6: if something is not a Yucatan but it is a kind of a pickings that it does not labor Herbart is not false. sent7: if something is not a Yucatan and is not a pickings then that it does not labor Herbart is not wrong. sent8: that the miconazole is not a kind of a pickings is true. sent9: something that does labor infelicity is nonpsychoactive. sent10: something does labor infelicity if it is a muckraker. sent11: if there is something such that it is not cubital and it is not a sojourn then the bronco is nonpsychoactive. sent12: the aphakic is a muckraker if the fact that it does labor infelicity is not false. sent13: The infelicity labors aphakic. sent14: the aphakic labors infelicity. sent15: if the advection is a pickings that is statics the bronco is not nonpsychoactive. sent16: the miconazole is not a Yucatan and it is not a kind of a pickings if the advection is not a kind of a pickings. sent17: if the miconazole is not a Yucatan and is a pickings then that it does not labor Herbart is right. sent18: the anathema is not a kind of a sojourn. sent19: something is not non-cubital but it is not a sojourn. sent20: the anathema is not a sojourn if the double-crosser is not a kind of a stress. sent21: the double-crosser is not a stress. sent22: the miconazole is not a kind of a pickings if the advection is not a kind of a pickings.
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the aphakic is a muckraker.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the bethel does spend ballpark.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the advection is a statics.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the advection is a pickings hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the advection is a pickings and it is a statics.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the bronco is not nonpsychoactive.; sent7 -> int6: if the miconazole is both not a Yucatan and not a pickings then it does not labor Herbart.;
the tostada is nonpsychoactive.
sent9 -> int7: if the tostada labors infelicity then it is nonpsychoactive.; sent10 -> int8: if the tostada is a kind of a muckraker it labors infelicity.; sent1 -> int9: the tostada is a muckraker if it does spend ballpark.;
$hypothesis$ = the miconazole does not labor Herbart. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does spend ballpark then it is a kind of a muckraker. sent2: the advection is both not a pickings and not cubital if the anathema does not labor Herbart. sent3: if the aphakic is a muckraker the bethel spends ballpark. sent4: that if the bethel spends ballpark then the advection is a kind of a statics is not wrong. sent5: if there is something such that it is a kind of non-cubital a sojourn then the bronco is nonpsychoactive. sent6: if something is not a Yucatan but it is a kind of a pickings that it does not labor Herbart is not false. sent7: if something is not a Yucatan and is not a pickings then that it does not labor Herbart is not wrong. sent8: that the miconazole is not a kind of a pickings is true. sent9: something that does labor infelicity is nonpsychoactive. sent10: something does labor infelicity if it is a muckraker. sent11: if there is something such that it is not cubital and it is not a sojourn then the bronco is nonpsychoactive. sent12: the aphakic is a muckraker if the fact that it does labor infelicity is not false. sent13: The infelicity labors aphakic. sent14: the aphakic labors infelicity. sent15: if the advection is a pickings that is statics the bronco is not nonpsychoactive. sent16: the miconazole is not a Yucatan and it is not a kind of a pickings if the advection is not a kind of a pickings. sent17: if the miconazole is not a Yucatan and is a pickings then that it does not labor Herbart is right. sent18: the anathema is not a kind of a sojourn. sent19: something is not non-cubital but it is not a sojourn. sent20: the anathema is not a sojourn if the double-crosser is not a kind of a stress. sent21: the double-crosser is not a stress. sent22: the miconazole is not a kind of a pickings if the advection is not a kind of a pickings. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the aphakic is a muckraker.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the bethel does spend ballpark.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the advection is a statics.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the advection is a pickings hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the advection is a pickings and it is a statics.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the bronco is not nonpsychoactive.; sent7 -> int6: if the miconazole is both not a Yucatan and not a pickings then it does not labor Herbart.; __UNKNOWN__