if the disavowing intercept does not occur then the fact that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur is not right.
sent1: the denationalizing three-decker does not occur. sent2: the spy or the challenging or both happens if that the dramaturgicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if the ski happens then the disavowing intercept happens and the postnatalness does not occur. sent4: that the allotropy does not occur and the daylight does not occur is triggered by that the atomization does not occur. sent5: if the interlinearness happens and the lignifying does not occur then the ski occurs. sent6: if the urging occurs that the interlinearness happens is true. sent7: that the disavowing intercept but not the postnatalness happens prevents the atomization. sent8: that not the alimentativeness but the contemptuousness happens is incorrect if the abranchiateness does not occur. sent9: that the denationalizing sword occurs and the lip does not occur does not hold. sent10: that the denationalizing sword occurs and the lip does not occur prevents that the allotropy happens. sent11: if the intralobularness does not occur and the northerly does not occur the dramaturgicness does not occur. sent12: that both the gavage and the non-blastocoelicness occurs is wrong. sent13: that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur does not hold if the disavowing intercept occurs. sent14: if the anecdote does not occur that the urging does not occur and the combinativeness occurs is incorrect. sent15: if the daylight does not occur then that the plutocraticness does not occur and the pet does not occur is false. sent16: if the fact that the drinking billet and the gavage occurs does not hold then the imponderable does not occur. sent17: that the postnatalness does not occur if that the daylight occurs and the atomization occurs is incorrect is true. sent18: the denationalizing sword does not occur. sent19: the fact that the postnatalness does not occur is correct if the atomization does not occur. sent20: if the postnatalness does not occur then the disavowing intercept happens. sent21: that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur causes that the allotropy does not occur. sent22: if the allotropy does not occur that both the daylight and the atomization happens does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur.; sent21 & assump2 -> int1: the allotropy does not occur.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: that the daylight happens and the atomization happens does not hold.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the postnatalness does not occur.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the disavowing intercept occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disavowing intercept does not occur.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur is wrong.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the plutocraticness does not occur and the pet does not occur does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = if the disavowing intercept does not occur then the fact that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the denationalizing three-decker does not occur. sent2: the spy or the challenging or both happens if that the dramaturgicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if the ski happens then the disavowing intercept happens and the postnatalness does not occur. sent4: that the allotropy does not occur and the daylight does not occur is triggered by that the atomization does not occur. sent5: if the interlinearness happens and the lignifying does not occur then the ski occurs. sent6: if the urging occurs that the interlinearness happens is true. sent7: that the disavowing intercept but not the postnatalness happens prevents the atomization. sent8: that not the alimentativeness but the contemptuousness happens is incorrect if the abranchiateness does not occur. sent9: that the denationalizing sword occurs and the lip does not occur does not hold. sent10: that the denationalizing sword occurs and the lip does not occur prevents that the allotropy happens. sent11: if the intralobularness does not occur and the northerly does not occur the dramaturgicness does not occur. sent12: that both the gavage and the non-blastocoelicness occurs is wrong. sent13: that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur does not hold if the disavowing intercept occurs. sent14: if the anecdote does not occur that the urging does not occur and the combinativeness occurs is incorrect. sent15: if the daylight does not occur then that the plutocraticness does not occur and the pet does not occur is false. sent16: if the fact that the drinking billet and the gavage occurs does not hold then the imponderable does not occur. sent17: that the postnatalness does not occur if that the daylight occurs and the atomization occurs is incorrect is true. sent18: the denationalizing sword does not occur. sent19: the fact that the postnatalness does not occur is correct if the atomization does not occur. sent20: if the postnatalness does not occur then the disavowing intercept happens. sent21: that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur causes that the allotropy does not occur. sent22: if the allotropy does not occur that both the daylight and the atomization happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur.; sent21 & assump2 -> int1: the allotropy does not occur.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: that the daylight happens and the atomization happens does not hold.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the postnatalness does not occur.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the disavowing intercept occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disavowing intercept does not occur.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: that the denationalizing sword does not occur and the lip does not occur is wrong.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__