that the enation is not a Laplace and it is not Laputan does not hold.
sent1: that the fact that the enation is not a Laplace and is not Laputan is not wrong is not correct if that it is a transsexual is not incorrect. sent2: the fore-topmast is both a firebreak and a transsexual. sent3: something is not a Laplace and it is not Laputan if it is not a silviculture. sent4: something is a kind of a sawtooth but it does not dropkick delusion if it is a silviculture. sent5: if the fore-topmast is a kind of a sawtooth the valet is unintrusive. sent6: the fact that the fact that the enation is a Laplace but it is not Laputan does not hold is correct if it is a transsexual. sent7: the fact that the fore-topmast does startle deerhound but it is not a silviculture does not hold if that it is unintrusive is true. sent8: if the enation is a transsexual that it is not a Laplace and is Laputan does not hold. sent9: the fact that the valet is a sawtooth but it does not startle deerhound does not hold. sent10: the enation is a kind of a transsexual if the fore-topmast is unintrusive. sent11: the fact that the enation is not a Laplace but Laputan is not correct. sent12: if that something is a kind of a sawtooth but it does not startle deerhound is not true then it is a firebreak. sent13: the fact that the valet is not a silviculture is not wrong. sent14: if something startles deerhound it is a kind of a firebreak.
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the valet is a kind of a sawtooth and does not startle deerhound does not hold then it is a firebreak.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the valet is a firebreak.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the valet is a kind of a firebreak and is not a silviculture.;
the fore-topmast is a sawtooth and does not dropkick delusion.
sent4 -> int4: the fore-topmast is a kind of a sawtooth but it does not dropkick delusion if it is a silviculture.;
$hypothesis$ = that the enation is not a Laplace and it is not Laputan does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the enation is not a Laplace and is not Laputan is not wrong is not correct if that it is a transsexual is not incorrect. sent2: the fore-topmast is both a firebreak and a transsexual. sent3: something is not a Laplace and it is not Laputan if it is not a silviculture. sent4: something is a kind of a sawtooth but it does not dropkick delusion if it is a silviculture. sent5: if the fore-topmast is a kind of a sawtooth the valet is unintrusive. sent6: the fact that the fact that the enation is a Laplace but it is not Laputan does not hold is correct if it is a transsexual. sent7: the fact that the fore-topmast does startle deerhound but it is not a silviculture does not hold if that it is unintrusive is true. sent8: if the enation is a transsexual that it is not a Laplace and is Laputan does not hold. sent9: the fact that the valet is a sawtooth but it does not startle deerhound does not hold. sent10: the enation is a kind of a transsexual if the fore-topmast is unintrusive. sent11: the fact that the enation is not a Laplace but Laputan is not correct. sent12: if that something is a kind of a sawtooth but it does not startle deerhound is not true then it is a firebreak. sent13: the fact that the valet is not a silviculture is not wrong. sent14: if something startles deerhound it is a kind of a firebreak. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the valet is a kind of a sawtooth and does not startle deerhound does not hold then it is a firebreak.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the valet is a firebreak.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the valet is a kind of a firebreak and is not a silviculture.; __UNKNOWN__