the gravida is meridional.
sent1: something is a kind of a cobble if the fact that it is not a monarchism and it is a Adonic is wrong. sent2: the fruit is a Toltec. sent3: if the fruit is a Toltec and it is not non-all the blink is not denominational. sent4: if something is not all then that it does not photosensitize perfectibility and it is not a kind of a Toltec is false. sent5: the fact that the blink is not nonsteroidal does not hold. sent6: that the blink is denominational and not meridional is not correct if it is nonsteroidal. sent7: the fruit is all and it cobbles. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not photosensitize perfectibility and it is not a kind of a Toltec is wrong then the carbonado photosensitize perfectibility.
sent7 -> int1: that the fruit is not non-all is correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fruit is both a Toltec and all.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the blink is not denominational.;
the carbonado photosensitizes perfectibility and it does cobble.
sent4 -> int4: that the fruit does not photosensitize perfectibility and it is not a Toltec is not true if it is not all.; sent6 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the blink is denominational and not meridional is not correct.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is denominational and it is not meridional is incorrect.; sent1 -> int7: if the fact that the carbonado is not a monarchism but it is Adonic is incorrect it cobbles.;
$hypothesis$ = the gravida is meridional. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a cobble if the fact that it is not a monarchism and it is a Adonic is wrong. sent2: the fruit is a Toltec. sent3: if the fruit is a Toltec and it is not non-all the blink is not denominational. sent4: if something is not all then that it does not photosensitize perfectibility and it is not a kind of a Toltec is false. sent5: the fact that the blink is not nonsteroidal does not hold. sent6: that the blink is denominational and not meridional is not correct if it is nonsteroidal. sent7: the fruit is all and it cobbles. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not photosensitize perfectibility and it is not a kind of a Toltec is wrong then the carbonado photosensitize perfectibility. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the fruit is not non-all is correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fruit is both a Toltec and all.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the blink is not denominational.; __UNKNOWN__