the Scotswoman is not a wear.
sent1: the manubrium is not a kind of a moment if either the Scotswoman does not wear or it displeases or both. sent2: that the megakaryocyte is phrenological thing that does sermonize SCLK does not hold if there is something such that it is not a Wac. sent3: if something is not dissimilar then it is nonexplosive and does recognize. sent4: if that the manubrium is a venture but it is not chromosomal is not correct then the Scotswoman is not a kind of a wear. sent5: either something does not wear or it does displease or both if it is nonexplosive. sent6: that the manubrium is a kind of a venture that is not chromosomal is incorrect. sent7: the Scotswoman is not a venture. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a Wac. sent9: that the manubrium is both a venture and not non-chromosomal is not right. sent10: the Scotswoman is not chromosomal. sent11: if that the megakaryocyte is not phrenological is not incorrect then the pallette does displease or it is a kind of a cable or both. sent12: if the manubrium is chromosomal the Scotswoman does not wear. sent13: something is not phrenological if the fact that the fact that it is phrenological and sermonizes SCLK hold is wrong. sent14: the Scotswoman is a wear if the manubrium is a moment.
sent4 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the seawater is not unpretentious but non-chromosomal does not hold.
sent5 -> int1: if the Scotswoman is nonexplosive then it either does not wear or does displease or both.; sent3 -> int2: if that the Scotswoman is not dissimilar hold it is nonexplosive and it recognizes.;
$hypothesis$ = the Scotswoman is not a wear. ; $context$ = sent1: the manubrium is not a kind of a moment if either the Scotswoman does not wear or it displeases or both. sent2: that the megakaryocyte is phrenological thing that does sermonize SCLK does not hold if there is something such that it is not a Wac. sent3: if something is not dissimilar then it is nonexplosive and does recognize. sent4: if that the manubrium is a venture but it is not chromosomal is not correct then the Scotswoman is not a kind of a wear. sent5: either something does not wear or it does displease or both if it is nonexplosive. sent6: that the manubrium is a kind of a venture that is not chromosomal is incorrect. sent7: the Scotswoman is not a venture. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a Wac. sent9: that the manubrium is both a venture and not non-chromosomal is not right. sent10: the Scotswoman is not chromosomal. sent11: if that the megakaryocyte is not phrenological is not incorrect then the pallette does displease or it is a kind of a cable or both. sent12: if the manubrium is chromosomal the Scotswoman does not wear. sent13: something is not phrenological if the fact that the fact that it is phrenological and sermonizes SCLK hold is wrong. sent14: the Scotswoman is a wear if the manubrium is a moment. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__