the fact that that the nonreflectiveness does not occur or that the studying acerbity does not occur or both is brought about by the thyroidness is incorrect.
sent1: the metabolizing sandblaster does not occur. sent2: either the Peloponnesianness does not occur or the shrouding does not occur or both. sent3: either the nonreflectiveness happens or the studying acerbity does not occur or both. sent4: the emigration occurs. sent5: that the replicating affusion happens and the generalship does not occur hold. sent6: the fact that the thyroidness does not occur is not false if that that the nonreflectiveness does not occur and the opening does not occur hold does not hold. sent7: the ohmage happens and/or the prosecution does not occur if that the slacks occurs is not incorrect. sent8: the grousing does not occur. sent9: the studying Arianism does not occur or the metabolizing declassification does not occur or both if the telecast happens. sent10: the replicating caviar does not occur and/or the priestliness does not occur. sent11: the syndicating occurs. sent12: that the edge does not occur or the interpellation does not occur or both is triggered by the studying acerbity. sent13: the nonreflectiveness happens. sent14: if the Armageddon does not occur then both the thyroidness and the studying acerbity occurs. sent15: if that the headline does not occur and the nuclearness does not occur is not correct then the studying mediant does not occur. sent16: if the unitariness occurs the depressing does not occur and/or the effusion does not occur. sent17: the Dutch does not occur and the sporting does not occur. sent18: the redeeming does not occur if the replicating breeziness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that both the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-openingness happens is not true.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the thyroid does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thyroidness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-openingness happens.; int3 -> int4: the nonreflectiveness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the nonreflectiveness does not occur and/or the studying acerbity does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the edge does not occur and/or the interpellation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the nonreflectiveness does not occur or that the studying acerbity does not occur or both is brought about by the thyroidness is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the metabolizing sandblaster does not occur. sent2: either the Peloponnesianness does not occur or the shrouding does not occur or both. sent3: either the nonreflectiveness happens or the studying acerbity does not occur or both. sent4: the emigration occurs. sent5: that the replicating affusion happens and the generalship does not occur hold. sent6: the fact that the thyroidness does not occur is not false if that that the nonreflectiveness does not occur and the opening does not occur hold does not hold. sent7: the ohmage happens and/or the prosecution does not occur if that the slacks occurs is not incorrect. sent8: the grousing does not occur. sent9: the studying Arianism does not occur or the metabolizing declassification does not occur or both if the telecast happens. sent10: the replicating caviar does not occur and/or the priestliness does not occur. sent11: the syndicating occurs. sent12: that the edge does not occur or the interpellation does not occur or both is triggered by the studying acerbity. sent13: the nonreflectiveness happens. sent14: if the Armageddon does not occur then both the thyroidness and the studying acerbity occurs. sent15: if that the headline does not occur and the nuclearness does not occur is not correct then the studying mediant does not occur. sent16: if the unitariness occurs the depressing does not occur and/or the effusion does not occur. sent17: the Dutch does not occur and the sporting does not occur. sent18: the redeeming does not occur if the replicating breeziness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that both the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-openingness happens is not true.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the thyroid does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thyroidness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-openingness happens.; int3 -> int4: the nonreflectiveness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the nonreflectiveness does not occur and/or the studying acerbity does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__