if not the contraction but the preying unreality occurs the preying turning does not occur.
sent1: if not the contraction but the preying unreality happens the manhunt occurs. sent2: if the winding occurs the surfacing happens. sent3: the thyrotoxicness occurs. sent4: if the shading does not occur and the segregation occurs then the magnetizing does not occur. sent5: the imponderableness is triggered by the swilling. sent6: the preying wooded happens and the offering happens. sent7: the jeremiad does not occur if the lithographicness does not occur but the preying wooded occurs. sent8: if the intensifying Florida happens then the mutter occurs. sent9: the fact that the misdemeanor occurs hold if the SNP happens. sent10: both the impedance and the scouting happens. sent11: the eruption happens. sent12: if the jeremiad does not occur and the corseting superposition occurs the preying Glaser happens. sent13: if the manhunt and the preying turning occurs the liberating does not occur. sent14: that the priorship does not occur is caused by that the unpaintableness happens and the unshrinkableness happens. sent15: that the mutter happens prevents that the liberating does not occur. sent16: the nonproprietariness happens. sent17: that the unpaintableness happens and the expounding occurs prevents the earlessness. sent18: the slivering happens or the unpreventableness happens or both. sent19: if the eruption does not occur but the stoning occurs the imponderable occurs. sent20: the solidifying happens. sent21: the generousness is prevented by that the legation occurs. sent22: the intensifying Florida and/or the unbuttoning occurs. sent23: that the unbuttoning occurs results in that the mutter occurs. sent24: that both the non-liveliness and the stave happens brings about that the ratcheting currier happens. sent25: the fact that the elongation happens is not incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the contraction does not occur but the preying unreality happens.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the manhunt occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the preying turning occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the manhunt and the preying turning occurs.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the liberating does not occur.; sent22 & sent8 & sent23 -> int4: the mutter happens.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the liberating occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the preying turning does not occur is correct.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if not the contraction but the preying unreality occurs the preying turning does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if not the contraction but the preying unreality happens the manhunt occurs. sent2: if the winding occurs the surfacing happens. sent3: the thyrotoxicness occurs. sent4: if the shading does not occur and the segregation occurs then the magnetizing does not occur. sent5: the imponderableness is triggered by the swilling. sent6: the preying wooded happens and the offering happens. sent7: the jeremiad does not occur if the lithographicness does not occur but the preying wooded occurs. sent8: if the intensifying Florida happens then the mutter occurs. sent9: the fact that the misdemeanor occurs hold if the SNP happens. sent10: both the impedance and the scouting happens. sent11: the eruption happens. sent12: if the jeremiad does not occur and the corseting superposition occurs the preying Glaser happens. sent13: if the manhunt and the preying turning occurs the liberating does not occur. sent14: that the priorship does not occur is caused by that the unpaintableness happens and the unshrinkableness happens. sent15: that the mutter happens prevents that the liberating does not occur. sent16: the nonproprietariness happens. sent17: that the unpaintableness happens and the expounding occurs prevents the earlessness. sent18: the slivering happens or the unpreventableness happens or both. sent19: if the eruption does not occur but the stoning occurs the imponderable occurs. sent20: the solidifying happens. sent21: the generousness is prevented by that the legation occurs. sent22: the intensifying Florida and/or the unbuttoning occurs. sent23: that the unbuttoning occurs results in that the mutter occurs. sent24: that both the non-liveliness and the stave happens brings about that the ratcheting currier happens. sent25: the fact that the elongation happens is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the contraction does not occur but the preying unreality happens.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the manhunt occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the preying turning occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the manhunt and the preying turning occurs.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the liberating does not occur.; sent22 & sent8 & sent23 -> int4: the mutter happens.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the liberating occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the preying turning does not occur is correct.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__