the arcade is a Castanospermum.
sent1: if the boxwood pegs monism it is a grits. sent2: the boxwood is sociological. sent3: there exists something such that that it is both a grits and a Castanospermum is wrong. sent4: if that the arcade is both not a Castanospermum and annunciatory is wrong it is not a prefixation. sent5: if the boxwood is a kind of a grits then that that it does not utter and is annunciatory is right is not correct. sent6: if something is annunciatory and it is a kind of a Castanospermum it is a grits. sent7: if something is not a prefixation but it pegs quatercentennial it pegs monism. sent8: the arcade is a Castanospermum if there is something such that that it does not utter and is annunciatory is not correct. sent9: if the boxwood is an archipelago and it utters then it is not ostentatious. sent10: if that the boxwood is not a prefixation and pegs quatercentennial is incorrect then it is not sociological.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the boxwood is not a prefixation but it pegs quatercentennial is wrong.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the boxwood is not sociological.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the boxwood is not a prefixation and pegs quatercentennial.; sent7 -> int4: the boxwood does peg monism if the fact that it is not a prefixation and pegs quatercentennial hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the boxwood pegs monism.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the boxwood is a kind of a grits.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: that the boxwood does not utter and is annunciatory is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not utter and it is annunciatory is not correct.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the arcade is a Castanospermum. ; $context$ = sent1: if the boxwood pegs monism it is a grits. sent2: the boxwood is sociological. sent3: there exists something such that that it is both a grits and a Castanospermum is wrong. sent4: if that the arcade is both not a Castanospermum and annunciatory is wrong it is not a prefixation. sent5: if the boxwood is a kind of a grits then that that it does not utter and is annunciatory is right is not correct. sent6: if something is annunciatory and it is a kind of a Castanospermum it is a grits. sent7: if something is not a prefixation but it pegs quatercentennial it pegs monism. sent8: the arcade is a Castanospermum if there is something such that that it does not utter and is annunciatory is not correct. sent9: if the boxwood is an archipelago and it utters then it is not ostentatious. sent10: if that the boxwood is not a prefixation and pegs quatercentennial is incorrect then it is not sociological. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the boxwood is not a prefixation but it pegs quatercentennial is wrong.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the boxwood is not sociological.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the boxwood is not a prefixation and pegs quatercentennial.; sent7 -> int4: the boxwood does peg monism if the fact that it is not a prefixation and pegs quatercentennial hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the boxwood pegs monism.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the boxwood is a kind of a grits.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: that the boxwood does not utter and is annunciatory is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not utter and it is annunciatory is not correct.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__