there is something such that if that it is a lari that is not a interrogative does not hold it is not Galwegian.
sent1: if the Bell is a lari that is not interrogative then it is not Galwegian. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a lari and not interrogative does not hold it is not non-Galwegian. sent3: if that something is a rasp but it is not civics is not right it is not apneic. sent4: if the fact that the Bell is a lari and it clinches Gibson is not true then it does not sidle Kiswahili. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does clinch unilateralism and it is pistillate is wrong then it is not philatelic. sent6: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a octopod that is not interior is not correct then the fact that it does not ramp Caelum is true. sent7: the Rh is not a Saigon if the fact that it clinches Akhenaton and is not Galwegian does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is a interrogative is not false then it is non-Galwegian. sent9: the extravasation is not a Hollywood if the fact that it is areolar and it is not Galwegian is not true. sent10: the Bell is Galwegian if that it is a lari and non-interrogative is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it is a lari but not interrogative then it is not Galwegian. sent12: if that something does decouple but it does not hatch klystron does not hold it is not a interrogative. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a lari and it is a interrogative is false it is not Galwegian. sent14: if the fact that the Bell is a patron but it is not doric is incorrect then it is not a interrogative. sent15: if the Bell is not a lari it is not Galwegian. sent16: if that the trammel is an indignity but it is not a lari is not true then it does not ramp gardening. sent17: the fact that there exists something such that if that it sidles Bell and is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-west does not hold then it does hatch unilateralism is right. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a lari then it is not Galwegian. sent19: the kawaka does not hatch klystron if that it sidles workflow and it is not chemical is not true. sent20: the Bell is not Galwegian if the fact that it is a lari and non-interrogative is wrong. sent21: if the fact that the Bell is a lari and a interrogative is incorrect then it is non-Galwegian.
sent20 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a rasp that is not civics is wrong then it is not apneic.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the pilothouse is apneic is incorrect if the fact that it is a rasp and it is not civics is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a lari that is not a interrogative does not hold it is not Galwegian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Bell is a lari that is not interrogative then it is not Galwegian. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a lari and not interrogative does not hold it is not non-Galwegian. sent3: if that something is a rasp but it is not civics is not right it is not apneic. sent4: if the fact that the Bell is a lari and it clinches Gibson is not true then it does not sidle Kiswahili. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does clinch unilateralism and it is pistillate is wrong then it is not philatelic. sent6: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a octopod that is not interior is not correct then the fact that it does not ramp Caelum is true. sent7: the Rh is not a Saigon if the fact that it clinches Akhenaton and is not Galwegian does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is a interrogative is not false then it is non-Galwegian. sent9: the extravasation is not a Hollywood if the fact that it is areolar and it is not Galwegian is not true. sent10: the Bell is Galwegian if that it is a lari and non-interrogative is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it is a lari but not interrogative then it is not Galwegian. sent12: if that something does decouple but it does not hatch klystron does not hold it is not a interrogative. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a lari and it is a interrogative is false it is not Galwegian. sent14: if the fact that the Bell is a patron but it is not doric is incorrect then it is not a interrogative. sent15: if the Bell is not a lari it is not Galwegian. sent16: if that the trammel is an indignity but it is not a lari is not true then it does not ramp gardening. sent17: the fact that there exists something such that if that it sidles Bell and is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-west does not hold then it does hatch unilateralism is right. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a lari then it is not Galwegian. sent19: the kawaka does not hatch klystron if that it sidles workflow and it is not chemical is not true. sent20: the Bell is not Galwegian if the fact that it is a lari and non-interrogative is wrong. sent21: if the fact that the Bell is a lari and a interrogative is incorrect then it is non-Galwegian. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__