the exile does not occur.
sent1: that the weeding encephalopathy happens is prevented by that the mutation does not occur or that the saltation happens or both. sent2: the exodonticness triggers that the weeding controlled does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the fingerlessness does not occur and/or the passing does not occur is false then the cornering snowflake does not occur. sent4: both the teamwork and the anticlimax occurs. sent5: if the fingerlessness does not occur then the immiscibleness occurs and the pass happens. sent6: the passing occurs. sent7: the mercurialness occurs. sent8: the jumping happens and the mercurialness occurs. sent9: if the weeding encephalopathy does not occur then the fact that the fingerlessness does not occur and/or the passing does not occur is not true. sent10: the immiscibleness is prevented by that the jump happens and the defiance occurs. sent11: the fingerlessness does not occur. sent12: both the exile and the jumping happens if the mercurialness does not occur. sent13: the unholiness occurs. sent14: if the defiance does not occur then the cornering snowflake occurs. sent15: the exile does not occur if the cornering snowflake occurs. sent16: that the fingerlessness does not occur triggers that the passing happens.
sent8 -> int1: the jumping happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the defiance occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the jumping happens and the defiance occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the immiscibleness does not occur.; sent5 & sent11 -> int4: the immiscibleness happens and the pass occurs.; int4 -> int5: the immiscibleness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the defiance does not occur.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the cornering snowflake occurs.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the exile happens.
$hypothesis$ = the exile does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the weeding encephalopathy happens is prevented by that the mutation does not occur or that the saltation happens or both. sent2: the exodonticness triggers that the weeding controlled does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the fingerlessness does not occur and/or the passing does not occur is false then the cornering snowflake does not occur. sent4: both the teamwork and the anticlimax occurs. sent5: if the fingerlessness does not occur then the immiscibleness occurs and the pass happens. sent6: the passing occurs. sent7: the mercurialness occurs. sent8: the jumping happens and the mercurialness occurs. sent9: if the weeding encephalopathy does not occur then the fact that the fingerlessness does not occur and/or the passing does not occur is not true. sent10: the immiscibleness is prevented by that the jump happens and the defiance occurs. sent11: the fingerlessness does not occur. sent12: both the exile and the jumping happens if the mercurialness does not occur. sent13: the unholiness occurs. sent14: if the defiance does not occur then the cornering snowflake occurs. sent15: the exile does not occur if the cornering snowflake occurs. sent16: that the fingerlessness does not occur triggers that the passing happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the jumping happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the defiance occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the jumping happens and the defiance occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the immiscibleness does not occur.; sent5 & sent11 -> int4: the immiscibleness happens and the pass occurs.; int4 -> int5: the immiscibleness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the defiance does not occur.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the cornering snowflake occurs.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__