the tourist does not concoct phlox.
sent1: if the blasphemer does not concoct fugu then the fact that it does not glare martensite and it is a constant is incorrect. sent2: the phlox does not concoct Chewa if there is something such that the fact that it either is uvular or is not a kind of a gamma-interferon or both is wrong. sent3: the phenylalanine is a Kartik and a dendrite. sent4: if something is a Kartik and does concoct fugu then the tourist is not irreverent. sent5: if something does not concoct Chewa then it glares martensite. sent6: there exists something such that that it is uvular and/or it is not a kind of a gamma-interferon is incorrect. sent7: if the fact that something does not glare martensite but it is a constant is not right it does not concoct Chewa. sent8: the phenylalanine concocts fugu if that the blasphemer is a constant is right. sent9: if something is not irreverent it concocts phlox. sent10: if the phlox does glare martensite then the blasphemer is a constant.
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the phlox does not concoct Chewa.; sent5 -> int2: if the phlox does not concoct Chewa it glares martensite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the phlox does glare martensite.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the blasphemer is a constant.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the phenylalanine does concoct fugu.; sent3 -> int6: the phenylalanine is a Kartik.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the phenylalanine is a Kartik and does concoct fugu.; int7 -> int8: something is a Kartik and it concocts fugu.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the tourist is not irreverent.; sent9 -> int10: if that the tourist is not irreverent hold it does concoct phlox.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the tourist does not concoct phlox.
sent7 -> int11: if the fact that the blasphemer does not glare martensite but it is constant is incorrect it does not concoct Chewa.;
$hypothesis$ = the tourist does not concoct phlox. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blasphemer does not concoct fugu then the fact that it does not glare martensite and it is a constant is incorrect. sent2: the phlox does not concoct Chewa if there is something such that the fact that it either is uvular or is not a kind of a gamma-interferon or both is wrong. sent3: the phenylalanine is a Kartik and a dendrite. sent4: if something is a Kartik and does concoct fugu then the tourist is not irreverent. sent5: if something does not concoct Chewa then it glares martensite. sent6: there exists something such that that it is uvular and/or it is not a kind of a gamma-interferon is incorrect. sent7: if the fact that something does not glare martensite but it is a constant is not right it does not concoct Chewa. sent8: the phenylalanine concocts fugu if that the blasphemer is a constant is right. sent9: if something is not irreverent it concocts phlox. sent10: if the phlox does glare martensite then the blasphemer is a constant. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the phlox does not concoct Chewa.; sent5 -> int2: if the phlox does not concoct Chewa it glares martensite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the phlox does glare martensite.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the blasphemer is a constant.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the phenylalanine does concoct fugu.; sent3 -> int6: the phenylalanine is a Kartik.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the phenylalanine is a Kartik and does concoct fugu.; int7 -> int8: something is a Kartik and it concocts fugu.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the tourist is not irreverent.; sent9 -> int10: if that the tourist is not irreverent hold it does concoct phlox.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__