the fact that the poultry is non-computational a brisance is false.
sent1: that the poultry is computational and it is a brisance is not correct. sent2: if the intussusception is not paleoanthropological then the fact that that the poultry is both computational and a brisance is false is not false. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does stifle overlay and is not a spelter is not right the intussusception is not paleoanthropological. sent4: if the poultry is paleoanthropological the fact that the intussusception is a jugale but it does not eulogize soapbox does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that that it does stifle overlay and is a kind of a spelter does not hold. sent6: there is something such that that it stifles overlay and is not a spelter is incorrect. sent7: the intussusception is not a Leptoptilus. sent8: if there is something such that it is a spelter then the intussusception is not paleoanthropological. sent9: something does stifle overlay but it is not a spelter.
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the intussusception is not paleoanthropological hold.;
there exists something such that the fact that it is a jugale that does not eulogize soapbox does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the poultry is non-computational a brisance is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the poultry is computational and it is a brisance is not correct. sent2: if the intussusception is not paleoanthropological then the fact that that the poultry is both computational and a brisance is false is not false. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does stifle overlay and is not a spelter is not right the intussusception is not paleoanthropological. sent4: if the poultry is paleoanthropological the fact that the intussusception is a jugale but it does not eulogize soapbox does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that that it does stifle overlay and is a kind of a spelter does not hold. sent6: there is something such that that it stifles overlay and is not a spelter is incorrect. sent7: the intussusception is not a Leptoptilus. sent8: if there is something such that it is a spelter then the intussusception is not paleoanthropological. sent9: something does stifle overlay but it is not a spelter. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the intussusception is not paleoanthropological hold.; __UNKNOWN__