if the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur then that the armament does not occur and the idealization does not occur is false.
sent1: the fact that the armament but not the idealization occurs is false if the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur. sent2: if the Flemishness happens then the disqualification does not occur and the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur. sent3: if the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur the Flemish does not occur. sent4: if the lysogenizing maiden occurs that the transcription does not occur and the monitoring does not occur does not hold. sent5: if the besoting ball-buster does not occur then the lysogenizing maiden and the bundling chess occurs. sent6: that the idealization does not occur is not false if the fact that the transcription does not occur and the monitoring does not occur is false. sent7: the fact that the lexicostatisticness does not occur is correct. sent8: that the besoting ball-buster does not occur is triggered by that the insectanness does not occur and the imprisonment does not occur. sent9: that not the armament but the idealization occurs does not hold if the Flemish does not occur. sent10: the fact that that the armament does not occur and the idealization does not occur is wrong if the Flemish does not occur hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Flemish does not occur.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: that the armament does not occur and the idealization does not occur is not right.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the disqualification does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur then that the armament does not occur and the idealization does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the armament but not the idealization occurs is false if the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur. sent2: if the Flemishness happens then the disqualification does not occur and the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur. sent3: if the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur the Flemish does not occur. sent4: if the lysogenizing maiden occurs that the transcription does not occur and the monitoring does not occur does not hold. sent5: if the besoting ball-buster does not occur then the lysogenizing maiden and the bundling chess occurs. sent6: that the idealization does not occur is not false if the fact that the transcription does not occur and the monitoring does not occur is false. sent7: the fact that the lexicostatisticness does not occur is correct. sent8: that the besoting ball-buster does not occur is triggered by that the insectanness does not occur and the imprisonment does not occur. sent9: that not the armament but the idealization occurs does not hold if the Flemish does not occur. sent10: the fact that that the armament does not occur and the idealization does not occur is wrong if the Flemish does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hemingwayesqueness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Flemish does not occur.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: that the armament does not occur and the idealization does not occur is not right.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__