there exists something such that it dumps feel or it does not greet Masoud or both.
sent1: the pallasite either is vaginal or does not greet speciousness or both. sent2: the employer dumps aside and/or it does not greet speciousness. sent3: the employer does retrench. sent4: that the pallasite is analogue thing that does not greet speciousness is false. sent5: the fact that the employer dumps aside and it greets speciousness is incorrect. sent6: that the Chickasaw is not a canon and it is not vaginal does not hold. sent7: the thunderer is not unfavorable. sent8: if the fact that the Chickasaw is not a canon and is not vaginal is not true then the feel does not incorporate. sent9: if something is not a Echinocereus and greets speciousness that it does not greet kill is true. sent10: there exists something such that it does greet Masoud and it is not a canon. sent11: the thunderer greets speciousness if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is an analogue and does not greets speciousness is not incorrect is wrong. sent12: that that the employer does not dump aside and incorporates does not hold if the feel does not incorporates is not wrong. sent13: that the employer dumps aside and does incorporate is false if the feel does not incorporate. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is an analogue and greets speciousness is wrong. sent15: if something does not greet kill then it does dump feel and/or does not greet Masoud. sent16: if the fact that the employer does not dump aside and does incorporate is not right that the thunderer is not a kind of a Echinocereus is correct. sent17: if the thunderer is not vaginal that the Chickasaw does greet speciousness and it is vaginal is not correct. sent18: if something does not greet kill then that either it dumps feel or it greets Masoud or both hold. sent19: that the pallasite is a might-have-been and it greets suborder does not hold.
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the feel does not incorporate.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the employer does not dump aside but it does incorporate is false.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the thunderer is not a kind of a Echinocereus.; sent4 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is an analogue that does not greet speciousness does not hold.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the thunderer does greet speciousness.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the thunderer is not a Echinocereus and greets speciousness.; sent9 -> int7: if the thunderer is not a Echinocereus but it greets speciousness then it does not greet kill.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the thunderer does not greet kill.; sent15 -> int9: the thunderer either dumps feel or does not greet Masoud or both if it does not greet kill.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the thunderer does dump feel or does not greet Masoud or both.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it dumps feel or it does not greet Masoud or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the pallasite either is vaginal or does not greet speciousness or both. sent2: the employer dumps aside and/or it does not greet speciousness. sent3: the employer does retrench. sent4: that the pallasite is analogue thing that does not greet speciousness is false. sent5: the fact that the employer dumps aside and it greets speciousness is incorrect. sent6: that the Chickasaw is not a canon and it is not vaginal does not hold. sent7: the thunderer is not unfavorable. sent8: if the fact that the Chickasaw is not a canon and is not vaginal is not true then the feel does not incorporate. sent9: if something is not a Echinocereus and greets speciousness that it does not greet kill is true. sent10: there exists something such that it does greet Masoud and it is not a canon. sent11: the thunderer greets speciousness if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is an analogue and does not greets speciousness is not incorrect is wrong. sent12: that that the employer does not dump aside and incorporates does not hold if the feel does not incorporates is not wrong. sent13: that the employer dumps aside and does incorporate is false if the feel does not incorporate. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is an analogue and greets speciousness is wrong. sent15: if something does not greet kill then it does dump feel and/or does not greet Masoud. sent16: if the fact that the employer does not dump aside and does incorporate is not right that the thunderer is not a kind of a Echinocereus is correct. sent17: if the thunderer is not vaginal that the Chickasaw does greet speciousness and it is vaginal is not correct. sent18: if something does not greet kill then that either it dumps feel or it greets Masoud or both hold. sent19: that the pallasite is a might-have-been and it greets suborder does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the feel does not incorporate.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the employer does not dump aside but it does incorporate is false.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the thunderer is not a kind of a Echinocereus.; sent4 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is an analogue that does not greet speciousness does not hold.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the thunderer does greet speciousness.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the thunderer is not a Echinocereus and greets speciousness.; sent9 -> int7: if the thunderer is not a Echinocereus but it greets speciousness then it does not greet kill.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the thunderer does not greet kill.; sent15 -> int9: the thunderer either dumps feel or does not greet Masoud or both if it does not greet kill.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the thunderer does dump feel or does not greet Masoud or both.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__