that the violator is a foster-daughter but it does not spray perpendicular is not right.
sent1: The fuchsia does not mass-produce log. sent2: the mouthpart mass-produces fuchsia if the violator mass-produces fuchsia. sent3: the fact that the log is not thermionic and it does not mass-produce fuchsia is incorrect. sent4: the violator is a foster-daughter. sent5: the blender does not mass-produce fuchsia. sent6: the log does not mass-produce fuchsia. sent7: if there is something such that it does not spray perpendicular that the greybeard mass-produces fuchsia but it is not thermionic is wrong. sent8: the log does not spray xerophyte. sent9: something is not thermionic if it does spray perpendicular. sent10: everything is heraldic and communicates violator. sent11: if there is something such that it does communicate violator or is a foster-daughter or both then the caber does not spray perpendicular. sent12: if the log does not spray perpendicular the violator is a foster-daughter but it does not spray perpendicular. sent13: if that the greybeard mass-produces fuchsia and is not thermionic is not true then the violator mass-produces fuchsia.
sent9 -> int1: the log is not thermionic if the fact that it sprays perpendicular hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the log does spray perpendicular.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the log is not thermionic is true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the log is not thermionic and it does not mass-produce fuchsia.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the log does not spray perpendicular.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the mouthpart mass-produces fuchsia is correct.
sent10 -> int6: the contrivance is a kind of heraldic thing that does communicate violator.; int6 -> int7: the contrivance communicates violator.; int7 -> int8: the contrivance communicates violator or it is a kind of a foster-daughter or both.; int8 -> int9: everything does communicate violator or is a foster-daughter or both.; int9 -> int10: either the Danish communicates violator or it is a foster-daughter or both.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it does communicate violator and/or it is a kind of a foster-daughter.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the caber does not spray perpendicular.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it does not spray perpendicular.; int13 & sent7 -> int14: the fact that the greybeard mass-produces fuchsia but it is not thermionic is not right.; int14 & sent13 -> int15: the violator mass-produces fuchsia.; int15 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the violator is a foster-daughter but it does not spray perpendicular is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: The fuchsia does not mass-produce log. sent2: the mouthpart mass-produces fuchsia if the violator mass-produces fuchsia. sent3: the fact that the log is not thermionic and it does not mass-produce fuchsia is incorrect. sent4: the violator is a foster-daughter. sent5: the blender does not mass-produce fuchsia. sent6: the log does not mass-produce fuchsia. sent7: if there is something such that it does not spray perpendicular that the greybeard mass-produces fuchsia but it is not thermionic is wrong. sent8: the log does not spray xerophyte. sent9: something is not thermionic if it does spray perpendicular. sent10: everything is heraldic and communicates violator. sent11: if there is something such that it does communicate violator or is a foster-daughter or both then the caber does not spray perpendicular. sent12: if the log does not spray perpendicular the violator is a foster-daughter but it does not spray perpendicular. sent13: if that the greybeard mass-produces fuchsia and is not thermionic is not true then the violator mass-produces fuchsia. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the log is not thermionic if the fact that it sprays perpendicular hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the log does spray perpendicular.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the log is not thermionic is true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the log is not thermionic and it does not mass-produce fuchsia.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the log does not spray perpendicular.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__