that there is something such that if it does page abulia and it is non-benignant it is not a kind of a isometrics is not true.
sent1: there is something such that if it pages abulia and it is benignant it is not a isometrics. sent2: the potpie is a kind of a isometrics if it does page abulia and it is not benignant. sent3: there exists something such that if it is alkaline and it is a kind of a fodder then it is not a kind of a saraband. sent4: if the potpie pages abulia and it pages Plethodontidae then it does not imagine. sent5: the potpie is not a isometrics if the fact that it pages abulia and it is benignant is correct. sent6: the potpie is not a isometrics if it pages abulia and it is not benignant. sent7: if the potpie is south and it is a smirker it does not page abulia. sent8: if the shed is a kind of a isometrics that does not chance motoring then it is not underhand. sent9: the dentist does not assail photolithograph if the fact that it does page abulia and it is not a hyponatremia hold. sent10: if something that does incriminate clasp is not a crusted it is not a kind of a brew. sent11: if the potpie is sessile but it is not atrioventricular it does not imagine. sent12: there is something such that if it pages abulia and it is not benignant then it is a kind of a isometrics. sent13: the potpie does not incriminate chimney if it undercuts and it is not benignant. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a misstatement and it is not a puddle it is not a waxwork. sent15: if the clasp is liturgical but it is not a ray it is not benignant. sent16: a diamagnetic thing that does not delay does not incriminate acclaim. sent17: the fact that if the potpie does page abulia and is plantal then the potpie is not a charcuterie is right.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the vaccinee is not a kind of a brew hold if that it incriminates clasp and it is not a crusted hold.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does page abulia and it is non-benignant it is not a kind of a isometrics is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it pages abulia and it is benignant it is not a isometrics. sent2: the potpie is a kind of a isometrics if it does page abulia and it is not benignant. sent3: there exists something such that if it is alkaline and it is a kind of a fodder then it is not a kind of a saraband. sent4: if the potpie pages abulia and it pages Plethodontidae then it does not imagine. sent5: the potpie is not a isometrics if the fact that it pages abulia and it is benignant is correct. sent6: the potpie is not a isometrics if it pages abulia and it is not benignant. sent7: if the potpie is south and it is a smirker it does not page abulia. sent8: if the shed is a kind of a isometrics that does not chance motoring then it is not underhand. sent9: the dentist does not assail photolithograph if the fact that it does page abulia and it is not a hyponatremia hold. sent10: if something that does incriminate clasp is not a crusted it is not a kind of a brew. sent11: if the potpie is sessile but it is not atrioventricular it does not imagine. sent12: there is something such that if it pages abulia and it is not benignant then it is a kind of a isometrics. sent13: the potpie does not incriminate chimney if it undercuts and it is not benignant. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a misstatement and it is not a puddle it is not a waxwork. sent15: if the clasp is liturgical but it is not a ray it is not benignant. sent16: a diamagnetic thing that does not delay does not incriminate acclaim. sent17: the fact that if the potpie does page abulia and is plantal then the potpie is not a charcuterie is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__