that the biggin is not an argosy but it reports mottle is wrong.
sent1: the biggin is not a cubist but it reports mottle if the tidbit does not reports mottle. sent2: the mono-iodotyrosine is not a cubist but it reports mottle if the tidbit does not reports mottle. sent3: the tidbit is not a kind of a cubist. sent4: the opportunist does not negotiate century if the cord is not intrinsic. sent5: the fact that the strap is not a safe-conduct and does not behold comprehension does not hold if there exists something such that it is structural. sent6: the biggin is not an argosy. sent7: everything is not a cubist and it is a disunion. sent8: the strap is not structural but a Rosidae if the fact that it does not negotiate century hold. sent9: if that the opportunist does not negotiate century is not wrong then it is not non-structural but a Rosidae. sent10: the biggin is not a kind of an argosy and reports mottle if the fact that the mono-iodotyrosine does not reports mottle is not incorrect. sent11: the cord is not intrinsic. sent12: everything is not non-structural. sent13: if the tidbit is a kind of non-cubist thing that is a disunion then the mono-iodotyrosine does not report mottle. sent14: everything is not a Occam and it negotiates cord. sent15: if the tidbit is a disunion that reports mottle the biggin is non-cubist. sent16: the mono-iodotyrosine is not a disunion if the biggin does not report mottle but it is an argosy. sent17: everything is not cubist. sent18: if the fact that something is structural is true that it beholds comprehension and it is not a safe-conduct is not true. sent19: if that the mono-iodotyrosine is not a safe-conduct is right that the biggin is not an argosy and does report mottle is not true. sent20: the mono-iodotyrosine does not report mottle if the tidbit is a kind of cubist thing that is a disunion. sent21: if the mono-iodotyrosine does not report mottle the biggin is not an argosy. sent22: if the tidbit is not a kind of an argosy then the biggin is both not a disunion and an argosy.
sent7 -> int1: the tidbit is non-cubist and a disunion.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the mono-iodotyrosine does not report mottle.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the biggin is not an argosy but it does report mottle does not hold.
sent12 -> int3: the strap is structural.; sent18 -> int4: if the fact that the strap is structural is not incorrect then the fact that it beholds comprehension and is not a safe-conduct is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the strap beholds comprehension and is not a safe-conduct is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there exists nothing that beholds comprehension and is not a safe-conduct.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the mono-iodotyrosine beholds comprehension but it is not a safe-conduct does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the biggin is not an argosy but it reports mottle is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the biggin is not a cubist but it reports mottle if the tidbit does not reports mottle. sent2: the mono-iodotyrosine is not a cubist but it reports mottle if the tidbit does not reports mottle. sent3: the tidbit is not a kind of a cubist. sent4: the opportunist does not negotiate century if the cord is not intrinsic. sent5: the fact that the strap is not a safe-conduct and does not behold comprehension does not hold if there exists something such that it is structural. sent6: the biggin is not an argosy. sent7: everything is not a cubist and it is a disunion. sent8: the strap is not structural but a Rosidae if the fact that it does not negotiate century hold. sent9: if that the opportunist does not negotiate century is not wrong then it is not non-structural but a Rosidae. sent10: the biggin is not a kind of an argosy and reports mottle if the fact that the mono-iodotyrosine does not reports mottle is not incorrect. sent11: the cord is not intrinsic. sent12: everything is not non-structural. sent13: if the tidbit is a kind of non-cubist thing that is a disunion then the mono-iodotyrosine does not report mottle. sent14: everything is not a Occam and it negotiates cord. sent15: if the tidbit is a disunion that reports mottle the biggin is non-cubist. sent16: the mono-iodotyrosine is not a disunion if the biggin does not report mottle but it is an argosy. sent17: everything is not cubist. sent18: if the fact that something is structural is true that it beholds comprehension and it is not a safe-conduct is not true. sent19: if that the mono-iodotyrosine is not a safe-conduct is right that the biggin is not an argosy and does report mottle is not true. sent20: the mono-iodotyrosine does not report mottle if the tidbit is a kind of cubist thing that is a disunion. sent21: if the mono-iodotyrosine does not report mottle the biggin is not an argosy. sent22: if the tidbit is not a kind of an argosy then the biggin is both not a disunion and an argosy. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the tidbit is non-cubist and a disunion.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the mono-iodotyrosine does not report mottle.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__