the poling radiopharmaceutical does not occur.
sent1: the spading does not occur. sent2: if the cryonicsness occurs the poling archaeopteryx happens and the transoceanicness does not occur. sent3: if the gonging swish does not occur the poling radiopharmaceutical occurs and the Galwegianness occurs. sent4: the poling radiopharmaceutical is prevented by that the torturing swish happens. sent5: the stunt does not occur if the ambush and the Odyssey happens. sent6: that the fragrantness does not occur is caused by that the Galwegianness and the gonging swish happens. sent7: the poling radiopharmaceutical does not occur if that not the torturing swish but the transoceanicness occurs is incorrect. sent8: the villain does not occur if the overture and the Panamanianness happens. sent9: the transoceanicness does not occur if that the poling archaeopteryx does not occur and the cryonicsness does not occur is not right. sent10: if the fragrantness does not occur the fact that the torturing swish occurs and the transoceanicness happens is not right. sent11: the stunt happens. sent12: the fact that the non-mammalianness and the pyroligneousness happens is not true. sent13: the Galwegianness happens. sent14: the bibliophilicness does not occur if the fact that the liposuction does not occur but the drollery happens is false. sent15: that both the torturing swish and the transoceanicness occurs is not correct. sent16: if the fragrantness does not occur the fact that not the torturing swish but the transoceanicness occurs is wrong. sent17: if the transoceanicness does not occur then the torturing swish or the non-fragrantness or both occurs. sent18: the gonging swish happens.
sent13 & sent18 -> int1: the Galwegianness happens and the gonging swish happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the fragrantness does not occur.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the torturing swish but the transoceanicness happens is not right.; sent7 & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the poling radiopharmaceutical occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = the poling radiopharmaceutical does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the spading does not occur. sent2: if the cryonicsness occurs the poling archaeopteryx happens and the transoceanicness does not occur. sent3: if the gonging swish does not occur the poling radiopharmaceutical occurs and the Galwegianness occurs. sent4: the poling radiopharmaceutical is prevented by that the torturing swish happens. sent5: the stunt does not occur if the ambush and the Odyssey happens. sent6: that the fragrantness does not occur is caused by that the Galwegianness and the gonging swish happens. sent7: the poling radiopharmaceutical does not occur if that not the torturing swish but the transoceanicness occurs is incorrect. sent8: the villain does not occur if the overture and the Panamanianness happens. sent9: the transoceanicness does not occur if that the poling archaeopteryx does not occur and the cryonicsness does not occur is not right. sent10: if the fragrantness does not occur the fact that the torturing swish occurs and the transoceanicness happens is not right. sent11: the stunt happens. sent12: the fact that the non-mammalianness and the pyroligneousness happens is not true. sent13: the Galwegianness happens. sent14: the bibliophilicness does not occur if the fact that the liposuction does not occur but the drollery happens is false. sent15: that both the torturing swish and the transoceanicness occurs is not correct. sent16: if the fragrantness does not occur the fact that not the torturing swish but the transoceanicness occurs is wrong. sent17: if the transoceanicness does not occur then the torturing swish or the non-fragrantness or both occurs. sent18: the gonging swish happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent18 -> int1: the Galwegianness happens and the gonging swish happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the fragrantness does not occur.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the torturing swish but the transoceanicness happens is not right.; sent7 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__