the fact that the epistle does not secede but it is a Order is not correct if the ZIP does shore.
sent1: the epistle does not secede but it is a Order if the ZIP does shore. sent2: if the fact that the ZIP does secede is right then the fact that the epistle does not secede and is a kind of a Order does not hold. sent3: if that the ZIP does not secede is true that it is a angiology that is a cystocele is incorrect. sent4: something is not a shore if the fact that it is not a kind of a angiology hold. sent5: that the epistle does not determine Coleonyx and is a kind of a drake is false. sent6: the fact that the ZIP is the shore if that the ZIP is both a angiology and a cystocele does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the epistle is a cystocele. sent8: if that something is a angiology and it is a cystocele is not true it is a shore. sent9: the ZIP does not shore if it is not a angiology. sent10: the fact that the epistle secedes and it is a Order is not true. sent11: the fact that if the fact that the ZIP secedes is not wrong then that the epistle does secedes and is a Order is not correct hold. sent12: the fact that that the epistle secedes and it is a kind of a Order is not false does not hold if the ZIP is a shore.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ZIP does not secede.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the ZIP is a angiology and is a cystocele is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the epistle does not secede but it is a Order is not correct if the ZIP does shore. ; $context$ = sent1: the epistle does not secede but it is a Order if the ZIP does shore. sent2: if the fact that the ZIP does secede is right then the fact that the epistle does not secede and is a kind of a Order does not hold. sent3: if that the ZIP does not secede is true that it is a angiology that is a cystocele is incorrect. sent4: something is not a shore if the fact that it is not a kind of a angiology hold. sent5: that the epistle does not determine Coleonyx and is a kind of a drake is false. sent6: the fact that the ZIP is the shore if that the ZIP is both a angiology and a cystocele does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the epistle is a cystocele. sent8: if that something is a angiology and it is a cystocele is not true it is a shore. sent9: the ZIP does not shore if it is not a angiology. sent10: the fact that the epistle secedes and it is a Order is not true. sent11: the fact that if the fact that the ZIP secedes is not wrong then that the epistle does secedes and is a Order is not correct hold. sent12: the fact that that the epistle secedes and it is a kind of a Order is not false does not hold if the ZIP is a shore. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ZIP does not secede.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the ZIP is a angiology and is a cystocele is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__