that both the non-Shintoness and the non-Lithuanianness happens is not right.
sent1: the Ukrainianness does not occur and the revenant does not occur. sent2: the non-invertibleness does not occur. sent3: if the sexism does not occur that both the deglazing Majorana and the acculturationalness occurs is not correct. sent4: if the earful does not occur the Ukrainianness happens. sent5: if the extrasensoriness does not occur then the fact that the deglazing wistfulness occurs and the reassurance happens is not true. sent6: that the rectifying does not occur results in that the Ukrainianness happens. sent7: if that both the deglazing wistfulness and the reassurance occurs does not hold then that the Shinto does not occur is correct. sent8: if the non-invertibleness does not occur then the fact that both the sexism and the barring foster-son occurs is not correct. sent9: if that both the deglazing Majorana and the acculturationalness occurs is not correct that the Lithuanianness does not occur hold. sent10: if that that the sexism and the barring foster-son occurs is false is not false then the sexism does not occur. sent11: if that the earful does not occur and/or the rectifying does not occur is false the extrasensoriness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the earful does not occur or the rectifying does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the Ukrainianness occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the Ukrainianness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the earful does not occur and/or the rectifying does not occur is incorrect.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the extrasensoriness does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the deglazing wistfulness and the reassurance happens is false.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Shinto does not occur.; sent8 & sent2 -> int8: the fact that the sexism and the barring foster-son occurs does not hold.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the sexism does not occur.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: that the deglazing Majorana and the acculturationalness happens is not true.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the Lithuanianness does not occur is not incorrect.; int7 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the non-Shintoness and the non-Lithuanianness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the Ukrainianness does not occur and the revenant does not occur. sent2: the non-invertibleness does not occur. sent3: if the sexism does not occur that both the deglazing Majorana and the acculturationalness occurs is not correct. sent4: if the earful does not occur the Ukrainianness happens. sent5: if the extrasensoriness does not occur then the fact that the deglazing wistfulness occurs and the reassurance happens is not true. sent6: that the rectifying does not occur results in that the Ukrainianness happens. sent7: if that both the deglazing wistfulness and the reassurance occurs does not hold then that the Shinto does not occur is correct. sent8: if the non-invertibleness does not occur then the fact that both the sexism and the barring foster-son occurs is not correct. sent9: if that both the deglazing Majorana and the acculturationalness occurs is not correct that the Lithuanianness does not occur hold. sent10: if that that the sexism and the barring foster-son occurs is false is not false then the sexism does not occur. sent11: if that the earful does not occur and/or the rectifying does not occur is false the extrasensoriness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the earful does not occur or the rectifying does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the Ukrainianness occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the Ukrainianness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the earful does not occur and/or the rectifying does not occur is incorrect.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the extrasensoriness does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the deglazing wistfulness and the reassurance happens is false.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Shinto does not occur.; sent8 & sent2 -> int8: the fact that the sexism and the barring foster-son occurs does not hold.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the sexism does not occur.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: that the deglazing Majorana and the acculturationalness happens is not true.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the Lithuanianness does not occur is not incorrect.; int7 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__