the afloatness and the welcoming occurs if the psychosexualness does not occur.
sent1: if the non-psychosexualness and the heedfulness occurs the afloatness happens. sent2: the heedfulness occurs. sent3: both the hogging kinin and the welcoming occurs. sent4: the afloatness happens if both the psychosexualness and the heedfulness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the psychosexualness does not occur.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: not the psychosexualness but the heedfulness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the afloatness occurs.; sent3 -> int3: the welcomingness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: both the afloatness and the welcoming occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the afloatness and the welcoming occurs if the psychosexualness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the non-psychosexualness and the heedfulness occurs the afloatness happens. sent2: the heedfulness occurs. sent3: both the hogging kinin and the welcoming occurs. sent4: the afloatness happens if both the psychosexualness and the heedfulness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the psychosexualness does not occur.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: not the psychosexualness but the heedfulness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the afloatness occurs.; sent3 -> int3: the welcomingness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: both the afloatness and the welcoming occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__