that the ciprofloxacin is non-diurnal but it impacts canon is false.
sent1: that the outpost is not a pierid and is not noncomprehensive is not correct. sent2: if something does not activate hobby it is both a pierid and not a eardrum. sent3: if the ciprofloxacin is not a eardrum the outpost is not noncomprehensive. sent4: if the fact that something is not vestiary but it impacts Hinayanist is not true it is vestiary. sent5: if the outpost impacts Hinayanist then the ciprofloxacin is not diurnal but it does impact canon. sent6: the outpost is not a pierid and not noncomprehensive if the ciprofloxacin is not a eardrum. sent7: if something is not diurnal but it impacts canon then it is a patrol. sent8: the outpost is a pierid and/or is a eardrum. sent9: if the fact that the Siamese is not a eardrum and/or is noncomprehensive does not hold the rudderpost is not a eardrum. sent10: the outpost either is noncomprehensive or does impact Hinayanist or both. sent11: something is a misogamist. sent12: that the ciprofloxacin is not a eardrum hold if it patrols and/or impacts Hinayanist. sent13: if something that is a kind of a pierid is not a eardrum the rudderpost is a patrol. sent14: if the fact that the Siamese beats and it is instructive is not true it does not activate hobby. sent15: that that the Siamese is a beating and is instructive is not correct hold if there exists something such that it is a misogamist. sent16: that something is not vestiary and does impact Hinayanist is not true if it is a kind of a patrol.
sent7 -> int1: the ciprofloxacin patrols if it is non-diurnal thing that does impact canon.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ciprofloxacin is not diurnal and does impact canon.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ciprofloxacin is a patrol.; int2 -> int3: that the ciprofloxacin is a patrol and/or it impacts Hinayanist is not wrong.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the ciprofloxacin is not a eardrum.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the outpost is not a pierid and not noncomprehensive.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the outpost is comprehensive but not vestiary is not right.
sent4 -> int7: the rudderpost is vestiary if the fact that it is not vestiary and it impacts Hinayanist does not hold.; sent16 -> int8: the fact that the rudderpost is not vestiary and does impact Hinayanist is false if it is a patrol.; sent2 -> int9: that if the Siamese does not activate hobby the Siamese is a pierid but it is not a eardrum is right.; sent11 & sent15 -> int10: the fact that the Siamese is a beating and it is instructive is wrong.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: the Siamese does not activate hobby.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the Siamese is a pierid but it is not a eardrum.; int12 -> int13: something is a pierid and not a eardrum.; int13 & sent13 -> int14: the rudderpost is a kind of a patrol.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the rudderpost is not vestiary but it impacts Hinayanist is wrong.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the rudderpost is vestiary.; int16 -> int17: there are vestiary things.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ciprofloxacin is non-diurnal but it impacts canon is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the outpost is not a pierid and is not noncomprehensive is not correct. sent2: if something does not activate hobby it is both a pierid and not a eardrum. sent3: if the ciprofloxacin is not a eardrum the outpost is not noncomprehensive. sent4: if the fact that something is not vestiary but it impacts Hinayanist is not true it is vestiary. sent5: if the outpost impacts Hinayanist then the ciprofloxacin is not diurnal but it does impact canon. sent6: the outpost is not a pierid and not noncomprehensive if the ciprofloxacin is not a eardrum. sent7: if something is not diurnal but it impacts canon then it is a patrol. sent8: the outpost is a pierid and/or is a eardrum. sent9: if the fact that the Siamese is not a eardrum and/or is noncomprehensive does not hold the rudderpost is not a eardrum. sent10: the outpost either is noncomprehensive or does impact Hinayanist or both. sent11: something is a misogamist. sent12: that the ciprofloxacin is not a eardrum hold if it patrols and/or impacts Hinayanist. sent13: if something that is a kind of a pierid is not a eardrum the rudderpost is a patrol. sent14: if the fact that the Siamese beats and it is instructive is not true it does not activate hobby. sent15: that that the Siamese is a beating and is instructive is not correct hold if there exists something such that it is a misogamist. sent16: that something is not vestiary and does impact Hinayanist is not true if it is a kind of a patrol. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the ciprofloxacin patrols if it is non-diurnal thing that does impact canon.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ciprofloxacin is not diurnal and does impact canon.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ciprofloxacin is a patrol.; int2 -> int3: that the ciprofloxacin is a patrol and/or it impacts Hinayanist is not wrong.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the ciprofloxacin is not a eardrum.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the outpost is not a pierid and not noncomprehensive.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__