that the baryticness does not occur but the uncommunicativeness happens is false.
sent1: that not the Frostianness but the awarding speculator happens is false if the Argentineness happens. sent2: that the catholicness happens is triggered by that the bag does not occur and the beanball does not occur. sent3: the face-off happens. sent4: that the whitelash does not occur does not hold. sent5: the uncommunicativeness occurs if the dint happens and the hiking does not occur. sent6: the clamp but not the biting occurs if the unpermissiveness does not occur. sent7: the whitelash yields that the antitrade does not occur. sent8: if either the factorizing thymus does not occur or the catholicness happens or both then the Argentineness happens. sent9: if that the hike does not occur hold the fact that both the awarding speculator and the Frostianness happens is incorrect. sent10: that the antitrade does not occur leads to that the dint but not the hike happens. sent11: the beanball does not occur. sent12: if either the non-pectoralness or the grimacing or both happens the circling purposelessness happens. sent13: the fact that the tide does not occur hold. sent14: the bag does not occur. sent15: that the baryticness does not occur is true if the fact that the Frostianness does not occur and the awarding speculator happens is false. sent16: that the non-baryticness and the uncommunicativeness happens does not hold if the bagging happens. sent17: the hike is prevented by that the antitrade and the dint occurs.
sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the bagging does not occur and the beanball does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the catholicness occurs.; int2 -> int3: either the factorizing thymus does not occur or the catholicness happens or both.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the Argentineness occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the Frostianness does not occur and the awarding speculator occurs does not hold.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the baryticness does not occur.; sent7 & sent4 -> int7: the antitrade does not occur.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the dint occurs and the hike does not occur.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the uncommunicativeness occurs.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that both the non-baryticness and the uncommunicativeness happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the baryticness does not occur but the uncommunicativeness happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the Frostianness but the awarding speculator happens is false if the Argentineness happens. sent2: that the catholicness happens is triggered by that the bag does not occur and the beanball does not occur. sent3: the face-off happens. sent4: that the whitelash does not occur does not hold. sent5: the uncommunicativeness occurs if the dint happens and the hiking does not occur. sent6: the clamp but not the biting occurs if the unpermissiveness does not occur. sent7: the whitelash yields that the antitrade does not occur. sent8: if either the factorizing thymus does not occur or the catholicness happens or both then the Argentineness happens. sent9: if that the hike does not occur hold the fact that both the awarding speculator and the Frostianness happens is incorrect. sent10: that the antitrade does not occur leads to that the dint but not the hike happens. sent11: the beanball does not occur. sent12: if either the non-pectoralness or the grimacing or both happens the circling purposelessness happens. sent13: the fact that the tide does not occur hold. sent14: the bag does not occur. sent15: that the baryticness does not occur is true if the fact that the Frostianness does not occur and the awarding speculator happens is false. sent16: that the non-baryticness and the uncommunicativeness happens does not hold if the bagging happens. sent17: the hike is prevented by that the antitrade and the dint occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the bagging does not occur and the beanball does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the catholicness occurs.; int2 -> int3: either the factorizing thymus does not occur or the catholicness happens or both.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the Argentineness occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the Frostianness does not occur and the awarding speculator occurs does not hold.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the baryticness does not occur.; sent7 & sent4 -> int7: the antitrade does not occur.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the dint occurs and the hike does not occur.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the uncommunicativeness occurs.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__