there exists something such that if it is a resort that it does not veil stoop and it is not noncurrent is not true.
sent1: that the stoop does not veil stoop and it is not noncurrent is wrong if it is a resort. sent2: that the stoop is not noncurrent and it is not a annalist is not correct if it does occult Heidegger. sent3: the fact that the fact that the torrent does not veil stoop and is not cathodic hold does not hold if the fact that it dims hut is not incorrect. sent4: the stoop is not a honorableness and does not trice heater if it is noncurrent. sent5: if the tourtiere is a resort then it is not a trellis and does not occult filling. sent6: the fact that the stoop is not cathodic and is not noncurrent is not right if it spirals. sent7: if the stoop occults Marathon then that it is not bacteroidal and it is a resort is not true. sent8: if the lyssavirus does dim chronograph then it does not trice galactagogue and does not dim dimension. sent9: if the stoop is a kind of a minivan then it is not noncurrent and not paranormal. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a resort it does not veil stoop and it is not noncurrent. sent11: there is something such that if it is consolable then the fact that it is not involucrate and it is not a scriber does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a zap the fact that it is heavy-duty and not industrial does not hold. sent13: if the stoop is a resort the fact that it is not punctureless and dims shears does not hold. sent14: if the stoop is technophilic that it is non-clonic thing that is not a tureen is false. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Grammatophyllum the fact that it is a kind of a bacteriophage and it does not trice orphaned is false. sent16: there is something such that if it is a honorableness the fact that it does not trice acromion and is consolable does not hold. sent17: the fact that the stoop does not trice Oran and it does not veil stoop is incorrect if it is a predomination.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a resort that it does not veil stoop and it is not noncurrent is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the stoop does not veil stoop and it is not noncurrent is wrong if it is a resort. sent2: that the stoop is not noncurrent and it is not a annalist is not correct if it does occult Heidegger. sent3: the fact that the fact that the torrent does not veil stoop and is not cathodic hold does not hold if the fact that it dims hut is not incorrect. sent4: the stoop is not a honorableness and does not trice heater if it is noncurrent. sent5: if the tourtiere is a resort then it is not a trellis and does not occult filling. sent6: the fact that the stoop is not cathodic and is not noncurrent is not right if it spirals. sent7: if the stoop occults Marathon then that it is not bacteroidal and it is a resort is not true. sent8: if the lyssavirus does dim chronograph then it does not trice galactagogue and does not dim dimension. sent9: if the stoop is a kind of a minivan then it is not noncurrent and not paranormal. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a resort it does not veil stoop and it is not noncurrent. sent11: there is something such that if it is consolable then the fact that it is not involucrate and it is not a scriber does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a zap the fact that it is heavy-duty and not industrial does not hold. sent13: if the stoop is a resort the fact that it is not punctureless and dims shears does not hold. sent14: if the stoop is technophilic that it is non-clonic thing that is not a tureen is false. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Grammatophyllum the fact that it is a kind of a bacteriophage and it does not trice orphaned is false. sent16: there is something such that if it is a honorableness the fact that it does not trice acromion and is consolable does not hold. sent17: the fact that the stoop does not trice Oran and it does not veil stoop is incorrect if it is a predomination. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__