the unhealthiness does not occur.
sent1: the spirometry happens and the transfiguration happens. sent2: both the acceptance and the stumbling occurs. sent3: the causativeness does not occur. sent4: that the idiographicness does not occur results in the fact that that the causativeness occurs and the indispensableness occurs is correct. sent5: the trial occurs. sent6: if the atrocity does not occur then the idiographicness and the trafficking reminiscence occurs. sent7: if the messaging does not occur then the unhealthiness and the fallibleness occurs. sent8: the cirrus happens and the asclepiadaceousness occurs. sent9: the flowage does not occur. sent10: if the hydraulicness occurs the trafficking western occurs but the atrocity does not occur. sent11: the idiographicness does not occur if that the idiographicness but not the hell occurs is false. sent12: if the asclepiadaceousness does not occur the unhealthiness and the cirrus happens. sent13: that the trafficking reminiscence occurs leads to that the asclepiadaceousness does not occur but the redirecting drawbridge occurs. sent14: the chronicness occurs. sent15: if the asclepiadaceousness does not occur then the specification but not the cirrus happens. sent16: if the causativeness occurs the fact that the trafficking reminiscence does not occur but the messaging happens is not true. sent17: the asclepiadaceousness happens. sent18: the messaging does not occur if that the messaging and the non-indispensableness happens is not true. sent19: that the messaging does not occur brings about that that the redirecting drawbridge but not the asclepiadaceousness happens hold. sent20: the messaging does not occur if that not the trafficking reminiscence but the messaging occurs is false. sent21: if the fact that the atrocity does not occur is not false the fact that the idiographicness happens and the hell does not occur is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unhealthiness happens.; sent8 -> int1: the cirrus occurs.;
the unhealthiness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the unhealthiness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the spirometry happens and the transfiguration happens. sent2: both the acceptance and the stumbling occurs. sent3: the causativeness does not occur. sent4: that the idiographicness does not occur results in the fact that that the causativeness occurs and the indispensableness occurs is correct. sent5: the trial occurs. sent6: if the atrocity does not occur then the idiographicness and the trafficking reminiscence occurs. sent7: if the messaging does not occur then the unhealthiness and the fallibleness occurs. sent8: the cirrus happens and the asclepiadaceousness occurs. sent9: the flowage does not occur. sent10: if the hydraulicness occurs the trafficking western occurs but the atrocity does not occur. sent11: the idiographicness does not occur if that the idiographicness but not the hell occurs is false. sent12: if the asclepiadaceousness does not occur the unhealthiness and the cirrus happens. sent13: that the trafficking reminiscence occurs leads to that the asclepiadaceousness does not occur but the redirecting drawbridge occurs. sent14: the chronicness occurs. sent15: if the asclepiadaceousness does not occur then the specification but not the cirrus happens. sent16: if the causativeness occurs the fact that the trafficking reminiscence does not occur but the messaging happens is not true. sent17: the asclepiadaceousness happens. sent18: the messaging does not occur if that the messaging and the non-indispensableness happens is not true. sent19: that the messaging does not occur brings about that that the redirecting drawbridge but not the asclepiadaceousness happens hold. sent20: the messaging does not occur if that not the trafficking reminiscence but the messaging occurs is false. sent21: if the fact that the atrocity does not occur is not false the fact that the idiographicness happens and the hell does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unhealthiness happens.; sent8 -> int1: the cirrus occurs.; __UNKNOWN__