the fact that the compendium does not unzip is not wrong.
sent1: if that something is philanthropic is true it does consternate wrapped. sent2: if the compendium is a Synentognathi that it is a dripstone is not incorrect. sent3: if the compendium consternates wrapped then it unzips. sent4: the fact that something is philanthropic is correct if it does consternate progenitor. sent5: if there is something such that that it does not consternate progenitor and it is not a Synentognathi is not right then the hatbox is a Synentognathi. sent6: the plagiarist does not disentangle blastomere if the bacchanal is not nonassociative but it is an anvil. sent7: the fact that the finial does not disentangle pie and disentangles signpost is incorrect if it strengthens merchandise. sent8: if the compendium is a dripstone it consternates progenitor. sent9: the lion is a Synentognathi. sent10: the compendium is a Synentognathi. sent11: if something is not cystic the fact that it is an anvil that does not snooker Symphytum is not wrong. sent12: that the plagiarist consternates progenitor and is not a dripstone is not right if it is not philanthropic. sent13: the reflex is philanthropic. sent14: if the workroom does consternate progenitor the compendium is not a Synentognathi and is a dripstone. sent15: the waxycap is not cystic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not disentangle pie and it disentangles signpost is false. sent16: the finial strengthens merchandise. sent17: if that the workroom does consternate wrapped and does not disentangle blastomere is not true it does not consternate wrapped. sent18: everything is not dorsal. sent19: if the plagiarist does not disentangle blastomere the workroom is philanthropic and does consternate wrapped. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is not millennial and it is nonassociative is incorrect then the bacchanal is not nonassociative. sent21: the fact that something is both non-millennial and nonassociative is not true if it is not dorsal. sent22: something that unzips consternates progenitor. sent23: if something that is not a Synentognathi is a dripstone then the fact that it does not unzip is not wrong. sent24: if something is philanthropic then it consternates progenitor. sent25: if the workroom does not consternate wrapped then the compendium is not philanthropic.
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the compendium is a dripstone.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the compendium does consternate progenitor.; sent4 -> int3: the compendium is philanthropic if it consternates progenitor.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the compendium is philanthropic.; sent1 -> int5: the compendium consternates wrapped if it is philanthropic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the compendium consternates wrapped.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the compendium does not unzip hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the compendium does not unzip is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is philanthropic is true it does consternate wrapped. sent2: if the compendium is a Synentognathi that it is a dripstone is not incorrect. sent3: if the compendium consternates wrapped then it unzips. sent4: the fact that something is philanthropic is correct if it does consternate progenitor. sent5: if there is something such that that it does not consternate progenitor and it is not a Synentognathi is not right then the hatbox is a Synentognathi. sent6: the plagiarist does not disentangle blastomere if the bacchanal is not nonassociative but it is an anvil. sent7: the fact that the finial does not disentangle pie and disentangles signpost is incorrect if it strengthens merchandise. sent8: if the compendium is a dripstone it consternates progenitor. sent9: the lion is a Synentognathi. sent10: the compendium is a Synentognathi. sent11: if something is not cystic the fact that it is an anvil that does not snooker Symphytum is not wrong. sent12: that the plagiarist consternates progenitor and is not a dripstone is not right if it is not philanthropic. sent13: the reflex is philanthropic. sent14: if the workroom does consternate progenitor the compendium is not a Synentognathi and is a dripstone. sent15: the waxycap is not cystic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not disentangle pie and it disentangles signpost is false. sent16: the finial strengthens merchandise. sent17: if that the workroom does consternate wrapped and does not disentangle blastomere is not true it does not consternate wrapped. sent18: everything is not dorsal. sent19: if the plagiarist does not disentangle blastomere the workroom is philanthropic and does consternate wrapped. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is not millennial and it is nonassociative is incorrect then the bacchanal is not nonassociative. sent21: the fact that something is both non-millennial and nonassociative is not true if it is not dorsal. sent22: something that unzips consternates progenitor. sent23: if something that is not a Synentognathi is a dripstone then the fact that it does not unzip is not wrong. sent24: if something is philanthropic then it consternates progenitor. sent25: if the workroom does not consternate wrapped then the compendium is not philanthropic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the compendium is a dripstone.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the compendium does consternate progenitor.; sent4 -> int3: the compendium is philanthropic if it consternates progenitor.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the compendium is philanthropic.; sent1 -> int5: the compendium consternates wrapped if it is philanthropic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the compendium consternates wrapped.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__