that not the vaulting but the leonineness happens is triggered by the prismaticness.
sent1: the vaulting is prevented by that the emulsifying buspirone occurs. sent2: that the emulsifying buspirone and/or the prismaticness happens leads to that the vaulting does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prismaticness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the emulsifying buspirone and/or the prismaticness happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the vaulting does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that not the vaulting but the leonineness happens is triggered by the prismaticness. ; $context$ = sent1: the vaulting is prevented by that the emulsifying buspirone occurs. sent2: that the emulsifying buspirone and/or the prismaticness happens leads to that the vaulting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prismaticness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the emulsifying buspirone and/or the prismaticness happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the vaulting does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__