that that there exists something such that if that it is not a stave is not wrong then that it does not metabolize synagogue or it does not manipulate or both is false is not wrong is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does stave then the fact that it either does not metabolize synagogue or does not manipulate or both does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a stave it does metabolize synagogue. sent3: the fact that the poser does metabolize synagogue and/or does not manipulate is incorrect if it is not a stave. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a lancer then the fact that it does last or it is not soteriological or both is incorrect. sent5: if something does not stave then the fact that it either does not metabolize synagogue or does not manipulate or both is false. sent6: the fact that either the poser does not metabolize synagogue or it does not manipulate or both is not right if that it is a stave is true. sent7: the poser does not metabolize synagogue and/or it does not manipulate if it is not a kind of a stave. sent8: there is something such that if it is not estrous then that it is a kind of a lapse or it is not lineal or both is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a stave then it does not metabolize synagogue and/or does not manipulate. sent10: if something is not a Scorpaenidae the fact that it is either not a complexity or not opaque or both hold. sent11: that the poser manipulates is right if it is not a stave. sent12: the fact that either something does not metabolize synagogue or it does not manipulate or both is not right if it staves.
sent5 -> int1: that the poser does not metabolize synagogue and/or it does not manipulate is not true if it is not a stave.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that there exists something such that if that it is not a stave is not wrong then that it does not metabolize synagogue or it does not manipulate or both is false is not wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does stave then the fact that it either does not metabolize synagogue or does not manipulate or both does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a stave it does metabolize synagogue. sent3: the fact that the poser does metabolize synagogue and/or does not manipulate is incorrect if it is not a stave. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a lancer then the fact that it does last or it is not soteriological or both is incorrect. sent5: if something does not stave then the fact that it either does not metabolize synagogue or does not manipulate or both is false. sent6: the fact that either the poser does not metabolize synagogue or it does not manipulate or both is not right if that it is a stave is true. sent7: the poser does not metabolize synagogue and/or it does not manipulate if it is not a kind of a stave. sent8: there is something such that if it is not estrous then that it is a kind of a lapse or it is not lineal or both is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a stave then it does not metabolize synagogue and/or does not manipulate. sent10: if something is not a Scorpaenidae the fact that it is either not a complexity or not opaque or both hold. sent11: that the poser manipulates is right if it is not a stave. sent12: the fact that either something does not metabolize synagogue or it does not manipulate or both is not right if it staves. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that the poser does not metabolize synagogue and/or it does not manipulate is not true if it is not a stave.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__