the stack is hypnotic and it is a kind of a bracken.
sent1: something is a kind of a Alpinism. sent2: the cairngorm is a kind of a jury that is a kind of a forint. sent3: the effluvium does glamorize synthesizer if the nudnik is a subduer. sent4: if the cairngorm concretizes estazolam then the ankus does not blunt and it is not a Cognac. sent5: the pizza is a portrait. sent6: the ankus is a kind of a Cognac. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Alpinism then the ankus is not a Cognac and does not concretize estazolam. sent8: if that the stack is not hypnotic is not incorrect the pizza is a portrait but it is not a Alpinism. sent9: if the effluvium glamorizes synthesizer the poster concretizes estazolam. sent10: if the stack is not hypnotic then the pizza is a portrait. sent11: the pizza is not hypnotic. sent12: if the poster concretizes estazolam then the cairngorm does concretizes estazolam. sent13: if something is not a Alpinism the ankus does not concretize estazolam. sent14: the stack is hypnotic but it does not blunt if the cairngorm is not a bracken. sent15: the cairngorm blunts. sent16: the stack is a bracken if that the cairngorm blunts hold. sent17: the ankus does not concretize estazolam. sent18: if the ankus does not blunt and it is not a Cognac the pizza is a Cognac.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stack is not hypnotic.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the pizza is a portrait that is not a Alpinism.; int1 -> int2: the pizza is not a kind of a Alpinism.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a Alpinism.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the ankus is not a Cognac and it does not concretize estazolam.; int4 -> int5: the ankus is not a Cognac.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the stack is hypnotic hold.; sent16 & sent15 -> int8: the stack is a bracken.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the stack is hypnotic and a bracken is wrong is right.
$hypothesis$ = the stack is hypnotic and it is a kind of a bracken. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a Alpinism. sent2: the cairngorm is a kind of a jury that is a kind of a forint. sent3: the effluvium does glamorize synthesizer if the nudnik is a subduer. sent4: if the cairngorm concretizes estazolam then the ankus does not blunt and it is not a Cognac. sent5: the pizza is a portrait. sent6: the ankus is a kind of a Cognac. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Alpinism then the ankus is not a Cognac and does not concretize estazolam. sent8: if that the stack is not hypnotic is not incorrect the pizza is a portrait but it is not a Alpinism. sent9: if the effluvium glamorizes synthesizer the poster concretizes estazolam. sent10: if the stack is not hypnotic then the pizza is a portrait. sent11: the pizza is not hypnotic. sent12: if the poster concretizes estazolam then the cairngorm does concretizes estazolam. sent13: if something is not a Alpinism the ankus does not concretize estazolam. sent14: the stack is hypnotic but it does not blunt if the cairngorm is not a bracken. sent15: the cairngorm blunts. sent16: the stack is a bracken if that the cairngorm blunts hold. sent17: the ankus does not concretize estazolam. sent18: if the ankus does not blunt and it is not a Cognac the pizza is a Cognac. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stack is not hypnotic.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the pizza is a portrait that is not a Alpinism.; int1 -> int2: the pizza is not a kind of a Alpinism.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a Alpinism.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the ankus is not a Cognac and it does not concretize estazolam.; int4 -> int5: the ankus is not a Cognac.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the stack is hypnotic hold.; sent16 & sent15 -> int8: the stack is a bracken.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__