there exists something such that if it wanders and it is unacquisitive then it does not cloister.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a icetray and it mystifies murderousness it is not a fetishism. sent2: the Kichai does not wander if it is monotheistic and diametric. sent3: if the mash does hum Hume and is vasomotor then it does not cloister. sent4: there is something such that if it is bigger thing that is inner then it is not aoristic. sent5: if the Kichai is both a pinochle and a cloister then it is not czarist. sent6: there is something such that if it wanders and is unacquisitive it does cloister. sent7: there is something such that if it is phyllodial and it is viricidal then it is not avocational. sent8: there exists something such that if it does mystify substantive and it is endometrial it is not a resistor. sent9: there is something such that if it is concessive and it is a cuscus then it is not palpable. sent10: the Kichai cloisters if it does wander and it is unacquisitive. sent11: that there is something such that if it is a gaminess and does piddle Bretagne it is not a kind of a Ptychozoon hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a tumble that is a kind of a bloodroot then it is not steadying. sent13: if the Kichai does wander and is unacquisitive then it is not a cloister. sent14: the piculet is not a Venezuela if it does mystify Kichai and it cloisters. sent15: there is something such that if it is a harem and it does mystify gryphon then it is not a kind of a mountaineer. sent16: if the Kichai is biotic and it is a kind of a peg then it is not a kind of a icetray. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a plasterer and it mystifies substantive then it is not high-tech. sent18: if the valise is subatomic and is a fetishism then it is not a thrill.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it wanders and it is unacquisitive then it does not cloister. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a icetray and it mystifies murderousness it is not a fetishism. sent2: the Kichai does not wander if it is monotheistic and diametric. sent3: if the mash does hum Hume and is vasomotor then it does not cloister. sent4: there is something such that if it is bigger thing that is inner then it is not aoristic. sent5: if the Kichai is both a pinochle and a cloister then it is not czarist. sent6: there is something such that if it wanders and is unacquisitive it does cloister. sent7: there is something such that if it is phyllodial and it is viricidal then it is not avocational. sent8: there exists something such that if it does mystify substantive and it is endometrial it is not a resistor. sent9: there is something such that if it is concessive and it is a cuscus then it is not palpable. sent10: the Kichai cloisters if it does wander and it is unacquisitive. sent11: that there is something such that if it is a gaminess and does piddle Bretagne it is not a kind of a Ptychozoon hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a tumble that is a kind of a bloodroot then it is not steadying. sent13: if the Kichai does wander and is unacquisitive then it is not a cloister. sent14: the piculet is not a Venezuela if it does mystify Kichai and it cloisters. sent15: there is something such that if it is a harem and it does mystify gryphon then it is not a kind of a mountaineer. sent16: if the Kichai is biotic and it is a kind of a peg then it is not a kind of a icetray. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a plasterer and it mystifies substantive then it is not high-tech. sent18: if the valise is subatomic and is a fetishism then it is not a thrill. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__