the fact that the catalufa preserves nectary and is a kind of a baiza is correct.
sent1: the fact that there is something such that it is a kind of a cat is true. sent2: there is something such that it preserves nectary. sent3: something does preserve nectary if it is autobiographical. sent4: there is something such that that it is not microcephalic is not false. sent5: if the nutrient does not abjure Pushkin and/or it is not a kind of a baiza then it is a Shang. sent6: if either something is not microcephalic or it is a Myxine or both then it is not a baiza. sent7: if the delft is a scam the catalufa is not a cat and it is not autobiographical. sent8: something cats if it is autobiographical. sent9: the catalufa either is not autobiographical or is not acronymic or both. sent10: the delft is both a Myxine and acronymic if there is something such that the fact that it is not microcephalic hold. sent11: if something is a kind of a Myxine then it is a scam. sent12: if the catalufa is both not a cat and not autobiographical it preserves nectary. sent13: the catalufa is a kind of a baiza if it is not phylogenetic or does not evade or both. sent14: if the catalufa does not evade it is a baiza. sent15: the delft is acronymic if something is not microcephalic. sent16: the delft evades and/or is not a Myxine. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is a miconazole is not incorrect. sent18: that either the catalufa is not phylogenetic or it does not evade or both hold.
sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the delft is a Myxine and it is acronymic.; int1 -> int2: the delft is a kind of a Myxine.; sent11 -> int3: the delft is a scam if it is a kind of a Myxine.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the delft is a scam.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the catalufa is not a cat and it is not autobiographical.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the catalufa preserves nectary.; sent13 & sent18 -> int7: the catalufa is a baiza.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the catalufa preserves nectary and it is a baiza is not true.
sent6 -> int8: if the delft is not microcephalic and/or is a Myxine it is not a baiza.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the catalufa preserves nectary and is a kind of a baiza is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there is something such that it is a kind of a cat is true. sent2: there is something such that it preserves nectary. sent3: something does preserve nectary if it is autobiographical. sent4: there is something such that that it is not microcephalic is not false. sent5: if the nutrient does not abjure Pushkin and/or it is not a kind of a baiza then it is a Shang. sent6: if either something is not microcephalic or it is a Myxine or both then it is not a baiza. sent7: if the delft is a scam the catalufa is not a cat and it is not autobiographical. sent8: something cats if it is autobiographical. sent9: the catalufa either is not autobiographical or is not acronymic or both. sent10: the delft is both a Myxine and acronymic if there is something such that the fact that it is not microcephalic hold. sent11: if something is a kind of a Myxine then it is a scam. sent12: if the catalufa is both not a cat and not autobiographical it preserves nectary. sent13: the catalufa is a kind of a baiza if it is not phylogenetic or does not evade or both. sent14: if the catalufa does not evade it is a baiza. sent15: the delft is acronymic if something is not microcephalic. sent16: the delft evades and/or is not a Myxine. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is a miconazole is not incorrect. sent18: that either the catalufa is not phylogenetic or it does not evade or both hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the delft is a Myxine and it is acronymic.; int1 -> int2: the delft is a kind of a Myxine.; sent11 -> int3: the delft is a scam if it is a kind of a Myxine.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the delft is a scam.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the catalufa is not a cat and it is not autobiographical.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the catalufa preserves nectary.; sent13 & sent18 -> int7: the catalufa is a baiza.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__