that if the nonjudgmentalness occurs then that that the introduction does not occur and/or the scouting dynamo happens hold is not right does not hold.
sent1: the nonjudgmentalness does not occur if either the introduction does not occur or the scouting dynamo occurs or both. sent2: if the discrimination does not occur the nonjudgmentalness happens or the eutherianness occurs or both. sent3: the non-hemisphericalness and/or the predating Xhosa happens. sent4: that the dominant happens is prevented by that the viscometricness occurs but the lambing does not occur. sent5: the fact that not the civility but the despite occurs is incorrect if the dominantness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the discrimination does not occur hold if that the civility does not occur and the despite occurs does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the introduction does not occur and/or the scouting dynamo occurs.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the nonjudgmentalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonjudgmentalness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the introduction does not occur and/or the scouting dynamo occurs is not true.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the spinning does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that if the nonjudgmentalness occurs then that that the introduction does not occur and/or the scouting dynamo happens hold is not right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the nonjudgmentalness does not occur if either the introduction does not occur or the scouting dynamo occurs or both. sent2: if the discrimination does not occur the nonjudgmentalness happens or the eutherianness occurs or both. sent3: the non-hemisphericalness and/or the predating Xhosa happens. sent4: that the dominant happens is prevented by that the viscometricness occurs but the lambing does not occur. sent5: the fact that not the civility but the despite occurs is incorrect if the dominantness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the discrimination does not occur hold if that the civility does not occur and the despite occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the introduction does not occur and/or the scouting dynamo occurs.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the nonjudgmentalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonjudgmentalness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the introduction does not occur and/or the scouting dynamo occurs is not true.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__