the fact that the fact that the compass does stigmatize pumpkin and/or it is a Mandelbrot is correct is not right.
sent1: the compass does not stigmatize culdoscope. sent2: if the hakim is romantic and it does fly the fact that it is an italic does not hold. sent3: if the hakim is not an italic the compass does stigmatize pumpkin or is a kind of a Mandelbrot or both. sent4: the leucocytozoan is hidrotic and it stigmatizes pumpkin. sent5: the compass is not romantic if it is an italic and it does stigmatize pumpkin. sent6: there is something such that that it stigmatizes pumpkin and it is not tectonics is incorrect. sent7: the compass is not a flies. sent8: The culdoscope does not stigmatize hakim. sent9: something is a kind of a romantic if it does not stigmatize culdoscope. sent10: the hakim is a li. sent11: that the compass is a Mandelbrot and is non-italic is wrong if the broad-bean does not stigmatize pumpkin. sent12: if the compass is a Mandelbrot and it is an italic then it is not a kind of a romantic. sent13: the hakim flies. sent14: the hakim is a Mandelbrot. sent15: the hakim does not stigmatize culdoscope.
sent9 -> int1: the hakim is romantic if that it does not stigmatize culdoscope is right.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the hakim is a romantic.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the hakim is a romantic and it is a flies.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the hakim is not an italic.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the machmeter is a romantic.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the compass does stigmatize pumpkin and/or it is a Mandelbrot is correct is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the compass does not stigmatize culdoscope. sent2: if the hakim is romantic and it does fly the fact that it is an italic does not hold. sent3: if the hakim is not an italic the compass does stigmatize pumpkin or is a kind of a Mandelbrot or both. sent4: the leucocytozoan is hidrotic and it stigmatizes pumpkin. sent5: the compass is not romantic if it is an italic and it does stigmatize pumpkin. sent6: there is something such that that it stigmatizes pumpkin and it is not tectonics is incorrect. sent7: the compass is not a flies. sent8: The culdoscope does not stigmatize hakim. sent9: something is a kind of a romantic if it does not stigmatize culdoscope. sent10: the hakim is a li. sent11: that the compass is a Mandelbrot and is non-italic is wrong if the broad-bean does not stigmatize pumpkin. sent12: if the compass is a Mandelbrot and it is an italic then it is not a kind of a romantic. sent13: the hakim flies. sent14: the hakim is a Mandelbrot. sent15: the hakim does not stigmatize culdoscope. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the hakim is romantic if that it does not stigmatize culdoscope is right.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the hakim is a romantic.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the hakim is a romantic and it is a flies.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the hakim is not an italic.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__