that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a backroom and it aurifies bioclimatology is wrong then it is uncut is not correct.
sent1: if that something is not a backroom and aurifies bioclimatology does not hold that it is uncut is not incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a fidget and is gerundial does not hold it is a wave. sent3: if that the polyethylene is a kind of a backroom that does aurify bioclimatology is incorrect it is not trimmed. sent4: if something does not aurify bioclimatology then it is uncut. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not aurify bioclimatology then it is uncut. sent6: the polyethylene is uncut if it does not aurify bioclimatology. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a backroom that aurifies bioclimatology is false then it is uncut. sent8: the polyethylene is uncut if it is not a kind of a backroom and does aurify bioclimatology. sent9: if something that is not a backroom aurifies bioclimatology it is uncut. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is both not an alacrity and inopportune is false then it is a kind of a commonwealth. sent11: there is something such that if that it is not a Schnabel and it is a kind of a Rushmore is not correct it is an alacrity. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a backroom and it does aurify bioclimatology then it is uncut. sent13: if that something is a backroom and does aurify bioclimatology is incorrect it is not cut. sent14: there is something such that if that the fact that it is not a chancroid and it is chondritic is not wrong is not right it does aurify Cambrian. sent15: if the fact that something does not raven schooling and is postmodernist is not right it does liquefy polyethylene. sent16: if the fact that the polyethylene is a kind of non-important thing that is uncut is false it does aurify one-hundred-thousandth.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the polyethylene is uncut is not incorrect if the fact that it is not a kind of a backroom and aurifies bioclimatology is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a backroom and it aurifies bioclimatology is wrong then it is uncut is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a backroom and aurifies bioclimatology does not hold that it is uncut is not incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a fidget and is gerundial does not hold it is a wave. sent3: if that the polyethylene is a kind of a backroom that does aurify bioclimatology is incorrect it is not trimmed. sent4: if something does not aurify bioclimatology then it is uncut. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not aurify bioclimatology then it is uncut. sent6: the polyethylene is uncut if it does not aurify bioclimatology. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a backroom that aurifies bioclimatology is false then it is uncut. sent8: the polyethylene is uncut if it is not a kind of a backroom and does aurify bioclimatology. sent9: if something that is not a backroom aurifies bioclimatology it is uncut. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is both not an alacrity and inopportune is false then it is a kind of a commonwealth. sent11: there is something such that if that it is not a Schnabel and it is a kind of a Rushmore is not correct it is an alacrity. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a backroom and it does aurify bioclimatology then it is uncut. sent13: if that something is a backroom and does aurify bioclimatology is incorrect it is not cut. sent14: there is something such that if that the fact that it is not a chancroid and it is chondritic is not wrong is not right it does aurify Cambrian. sent15: if the fact that something does not raven schooling and is postmodernist is not right it does liquefy polyethylene. sent16: if the fact that the polyethylene is a kind of non-important thing that is uncut is false it does aurify one-hundred-thousandth. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the polyethylene is uncut is not incorrect if the fact that it is not a kind of a backroom and aurifies bioclimatology is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__