there exists something such that it is a kind of a Kuiper or does rejoin or both.
sent1: the butch does not rejoin if it is not a kind of a Lanzhou. sent2: that the butch does interpret ballup and is a kind of a Lanzhou is not correct if the satellite is not a Lanzhou. sent3: if the butch is a Ephesian that the satellite is a Ephesian is right. sent4: the butch is not a Lanzhou. sent5: that if the butch is benthic then the butch does interpret ballup but it is not a Lanzhou is not incorrect. sent6: a Kuiper is a kind of a call-back. sent7: if the satellite is not a Lanzhou then the fact that the butch does interpret ballup and is not a kind of a Lanzhou is not right. sent8: if the fact that the butch rejoins is correct it is epizoan and it is not a kind of a Lanzhou. sent9: the butch is benthic. sent10: the butch is not a Lanzhou if it is benthic. sent11: the fact that the butch interprets ballup and it is a kind of a Lanzhou is false. sent12: if something is not epizoan then it is not a Lanzhou. sent13: the butch interprets ballup and/or it is divergent. sent14: that the butch interprets ballup but it is not epizoan is not right if there is something such that the fact that it is epizoan is true. sent15: that the butch is both a Lanzhou and not a Kuiper does not hold. sent16: if the satellite is not a Lanzhou then the fact that the butch is epizoan but it is not a Lanzhou does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the satellite is not a Kuiper.; sent12 -> int1: the satellite is not a kind of a Lanzhou if it is not epizoan.; sent5 & sent9 -> int2: the butch does interpret ballup and is not a Lanzhou.;
the fact that the butch is a Lanzhou or a call-back or both is right.
sent6 -> int3: if the butch is a kind of a Kuiper then it is a kind of a call-back.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is a kind of a Kuiper or does rejoin or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the butch does not rejoin if it is not a kind of a Lanzhou. sent2: that the butch does interpret ballup and is a kind of a Lanzhou is not correct if the satellite is not a Lanzhou. sent3: if the butch is a Ephesian that the satellite is a Ephesian is right. sent4: the butch is not a Lanzhou. sent5: that if the butch is benthic then the butch does interpret ballup but it is not a Lanzhou is not incorrect. sent6: a Kuiper is a kind of a call-back. sent7: if the satellite is not a Lanzhou then the fact that the butch does interpret ballup and is not a kind of a Lanzhou is not right. sent8: if the fact that the butch rejoins is correct it is epizoan and it is not a kind of a Lanzhou. sent9: the butch is benthic. sent10: the butch is not a Lanzhou if it is benthic. sent11: the fact that the butch interprets ballup and it is a kind of a Lanzhou is false. sent12: if something is not epizoan then it is not a Lanzhou. sent13: the butch interprets ballup and/or it is divergent. sent14: that the butch interprets ballup but it is not epizoan is not right if there is something such that the fact that it is epizoan is true. sent15: that the butch is both a Lanzhou and not a Kuiper does not hold. sent16: if the satellite is not a Lanzhou then the fact that the butch is epizoan but it is not a Lanzhou does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the satellite is not a Kuiper.; sent12 -> int1: the satellite is not a kind of a Lanzhou if it is not epizoan.; sent5 & sent9 -> int2: the butch does interpret ballup and is not a Lanzhou.; __UNKNOWN__