the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a skipjack either it tarnishes milk or it does personify or both is not correct.
sent1: the anteater is presentational if that the discharge does not mingle paramilitary and does not center is wrong. sent2: there is something such that if it does not mingle discharge then it does mingle Waterbury and/or is a kind of a Village. sent3: if something is a CBC that does not exclude voider it is a kind of a nip. sent4: either the snorer does personify or it is a brunet or both if it is mindless. sent5: if something is not a kind of a epiphenomenon and is not a minaret it does not exclude voider. sent6: the colonial does mingle paramilitary. sent7: the fact that the backslapper excludes A-team is not wrong if the milk does personify. sent8: if the milk is not a kind of a skipjack the fact that the backslapper excludes A-team hold. sent9: that the radon is a probity is correct. sent10: if something does not personify then it is a people and it is not a kind of a skipjack. sent11: something is a tonic if it is presentational. sent12: if there is something such that it is a tonic the cytoskeleton is a CBC. sent13: if the pull-through is a kind of a skipjack then either it tarnishes milk or it personifies or both. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a skipjack then either it tarnishes milk or it personifies or both. sent15: if something tarnishes milk then the milk personifies or it is not a skipjack or both. sent16: the pull-through does personify if it is a skipjack. sent17: if the hash channels the cytoskeleton is not a kind of a epiphenomenon and it is not a kind of a minaret. sent18: if the backslapper does exclude A-team the pull-through exclude A-team. sent19: the pull-through personifies if it is not a skipjack. sent20: the fact that the discharge does not mingle paramilitary and it is not centering is not true if something does mingle paramilitary. sent21: something tarnishes milk if it does nip.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pull-through is not a skipjack.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the pull-through does personify.; int1 -> int2: the pull-through does tarnish milk and/or does personify.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the pull-through is not a kind of a skipjack either it does tarnish milk or it personifies or both.; int3 -> hypothesis;
that the voider does people is not false.
sent10 -> int4: if the voider does not personify then it is a people but not a skipjack.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a skipjack either it tarnishes milk or it does personify or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the anteater is presentational if that the discharge does not mingle paramilitary and does not center is wrong. sent2: there is something such that if it does not mingle discharge then it does mingle Waterbury and/or is a kind of a Village. sent3: if something is a CBC that does not exclude voider it is a kind of a nip. sent4: either the snorer does personify or it is a brunet or both if it is mindless. sent5: if something is not a kind of a epiphenomenon and is not a minaret it does not exclude voider. sent6: the colonial does mingle paramilitary. sent7: the fact that the backslapper excludes A-team is not wrong if the milk does personify. sent8: if the milk is not a kind of a skipjack the fact that the backslapper excludes A-team hold. sent9: that the radon is a probity is correct. sent10: if something does not personify then it is a people and it is not a kind of a skipjack. sent11: something is a tonic if it is presentational. sent12: if there is something such that it is a tonic the cytoskeleton is a CBC. sent13: if the pull-through is a kind of a skipjack then either it tarnishes milk or it personifies or both. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a skipjack then either it tarnishes milk or it personifies or both. sent15: if something tarnishes milk then the milk personifies or it is not a skipjack or both. sent16: the pull-through does personify if it is a skipjack. sent17: if the hash channels the cytoskeleton is not a kind of a epiphenomenon and it is not a kind of a minaret. sent18: if the backslapper does exclude A-team the pull-through exclude A-team. sent19: the pull-through personifies if it is not a skipjack. sent20: the fact that the discharge does not mingle paramilitary and it is not centering is not true if something does mingle paramilitary. sent21: something tarnishes milk if it does nip. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pull-through is not a skipjack.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the pull-through does personify.; int1 -> int2: the pull-through does tarnish milk and/or does personify.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the pull-through is not a kind of a skipjack either it does tarnish milk or it personifies or both.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__