the endocranium is polyvalent.
sent1: the endocranium is polyvalent if the plasterer is precise. sent2: something does not configure silicate if that it is precise and it configure silicate is not true. sent3: that there exists something such that that it does not configure silicate and is australopithecine is not true is correct. sent4: if the decor is a kind of an australopithecine then that it does not configure silicate is correct. sent5: there exists something such that it is polyvalent. sent6: if there is something such that that it is not polyvalent and it is not katabatic is wrong the endocranium is not a kind of a cortex. sent7: that the plasterer is katabatic but it is not a kind of a cortex if there are imprecise things is not wrong. sent8: the decor is a cortex but it is not an australopithecine if something is not katabatic. sent9: something is not precise. sent10: the decor is an australopithecine if it is not .45-caliber. sent11: that the decor does not configure silicate and it is not australopithecine is not true if the plasterer is not a cortex. sent12: if there exists something such that that it does not configure silicate and it is not australopithecine is wrong the endocranium is not polyvalent. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is not polyvalent but katabatic is not correct. sent14: there is something such that it is precise.
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the plasterer is both katabatic and not a cortex.; int1 -> int2: the plasterer is not a cortex.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the decor does not configure silicate and is not a kind of an australopithecine is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it does not configure silicate and it is not an australopithecine is false.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the endocranium is polyvalent is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the endocranium is polyvalent. ; $context$ = sent1: the endocranium is polyvalent if the plasterer is precise. sent2: something does not configure silicate if that it is precise and it configure silicate is not true. sent3: that there exists something such that that it does not configure silicate and is australopithecine is not true is correct. sent4: if the decor is a kind of an australopithecine then that it does not configure silicate is correct. sent5: there exists something such that it is polyvalent. sent6: if there is something such that that it is not polyvalent and it is not katabatic is wrong the endocranium is not a kind of a cortex. sent7: that the plasterer is katabatic but it is not a kind of a cortex if there are imprecise things is not wrong. sent8: the decor is a cortex but it is not an australopithecine if something is not katabatic. sent9: something is not precise. sent10: the decor is an australopithecine if it is not .45-caliber. sent11: that the decor does not configure silicate and it is not australopithecine is not true if the plasterer is not a cortex. sent12: if there exists something such that that it does not configure silicate and it is not australopithecine is wrong the endocranium is not polyvalent. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is not polyvalent but katabatic is not correct. sent14: there is something such that it is precise. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the plasterer is both katabatic and not a cortex.; int1 -> int2: the plasterer is not a cortex.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the decor does not configure silicate and is not a kind of an australopithecine is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it does not configure silicate and it is not an australopithecine is false.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__