if the panatela is a Nijinsky that the rosette is a kind of a NT is not incorrect.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not open Pharisee hold the amiodarone either is a chelate or is a edibility or both. sent2: the Muskhogean does not Simonize ceratodus but it is a Ehrlich. sent3: there is something such that it does not open Pharisee. sent4: the panatela is diamagnetic. sent5: That the ceratodus does Simonize keurboom is not wrong. sent6: if the fact that something does not organize but it does cleave is wrong it organize. sent7: the keurboom is diamagnetic. sent8: the mangabey does chelate if the amiodarone chelate. sent9: that that the argent does not cleave and is a NT does not hold is right if there is something such that it does not Simonize ceratodus. sent10: that the keurboom does Simonize ceratodus is not wrong. sent11: if the amiodarone is a edibility then the mangabey does chelate. sent12: the panatela does Simonize ceratodus. sent13: if the fact that the keurboom Simonizes ceratodus is not false the fact that the panatela does organize and it cleaves is incorrect. sent14: something does not organize if it is not non-diamagnetic and it is voyeuristic. sent15: that if the keurboom is not a NT then the rosette is a Nijinsky and does organize is right. sent16: the rosette is a NT if the panatela is not voyeuristic but it is a kind of a Nijinsky. sent17: the fact that the panatela does organize and it cleaves is wrong. sent18: if the keurboom Simonizes ceratodus then the fact that the panatela does not organize but it cleaves is false. sent19: the stockist does not Simonize ceratodus and is not a deadlock if the mangabey is a chelate. sent20: if there exists something such that that it does not cleave and is a NT is wrong then the keurboom is not a kind of a NT.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the panatela is voyeuristic.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the panatela is diamagnetic and it is voyeuristic.; sent14 -> int2: the panatela does not organize if it is diamagnetic and is voyeuristic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panatela does not organize.; sent6 -> int4: the panatela does organize if that it does not organize and does cleave is not correct.; sent18 & sent10 -> int5: that the panatela does not organize and cleaves does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the panatela does organize.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the panatela is not voyeuristic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the panatela is a Nijinsky.; int8 & assump2 -> int9: the panatela is not voyeuristic but it is a Nijinsky.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the rosette is a NT.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the substation is diamagnetic.
sent3 & sent1 -> int11: either the amiodarone is not non-chelate or it is a kind of a edibility or both.; int11 & sent8 & sent11 -> int12: the mangabey chelates.; sent19 & int12 -> int13: the stockist does not Simonize ceratodus and it is not a deadlock.; int13 -> int14: that the stockist does not Simonize ceratodus is not incorrect.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it does not Simonize ceratodus.; int15 & sent9 -> int16: the fact that the argent does not cleave but it is a NT is not true.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that that it does not cleave and is a NT is not correct.; int17 & sent20 -> int18: the keurboom is not a NT.; sent15 & int18 -> int19: the rosette is a kind of a Nijinsky and it does organize.; int19 -> int20: the rosette organizes.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that it does organize.;
$hypothesis$ = if the panatela is a Nijinsky that the rosette is a kind of a NT is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not open Pharisee hold the amiodarone either is a chelate or is a edibility or both. sent2: the Muskhogean does not Simonize ceratodus but it is a Ehrlich. sent3: there is something such that it does not open Pharisee. sent4: the panatela is diamagnetic. sent5: That the ceratodus does Simonize keurboom is not wrong. sent6: if the fact that something does not organize but it does cleave is wrong it organize. sent7: the keurboom is diamagnetic. sent8: the mangabey does chelate if the amiodarone chelate. sent9: that that the argent does not cleave and is a NT does not hold is right if there is something such that it does not Simonize ceratodus. sent10: that the keurboom does Simonize ceratodus is not wrong. sent11: if the amiodarone is a edibility then the mangabey does chelate. sent12: the panatela does Simonize ceratodus. sent13: if the fact that the keurboom Simonizes ceratodus is not false the fact that the panatela does organize and it cleaves is incorrect. sent14: something does not organize if it is not non-diamagnetic and it is voyeuristic. sent15: that if the keurboom is not a NT then the rosette is a Nijinsky and does organize is right. sent16: the rosette is a NT if the panatela is not voyeuristic but it is a kind of a Nijinsky. sent17: the fact that the panatela does organize and it cleaves is wrong. sent18: if the keurboom Simonizes ceratodus then the fact that the panatela does not organize but it cleaves is false. sent19: the stockist does not Simonize ceratodus and is not a deadlock if the mangabey is a chelate. sent20: if there exists something such that that it does not cleave and is a NT is wrong then the keurboom is not a kind of a NT. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the panatela is voyeuristic.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the panatela is diamagnetic and it is voyeuristic.; sent14 -> int2: the panatela does not organize if it is diamagnetic and is voyeuristic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panatela does not organize.; sent6 -> int4: the panatela does organize if that it does not organize and does cleave is not correct.; sent18 & sent10 -> int5: that the panatela does not organize and cleaves does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the panatela does organize.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the panatela is not voyeuristic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the panatela is a Nijinsky.; int8 & assump2 -> int9: the panatela is not voyeuristic but it is a Nijinsky.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the rosette is a NT.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__