the fact that the reheating ciprofloxacin but not the insufflating bumptiousness occurs is not true if the point-of-saleness occurs.
sent1: if the comforts occurs then the fact that the drilling freckle occurs and the protectiveness does not occur is not true. sent2: that both the tailgating millime and the tango occurs does not hold if the fortunateness does not occur. sent3: that the reheating ciprofloxacin occurs and the insufflating bumptiousness happens is incorrect. sent4: the anisogameticness results in the non-point-of-saleness. sent5: the fact that the Scandinavianness and the non-triclinicness happens does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the reheating tipstaff does not occur is not incorrect that the reheating ciprofloxacin happens and the insufflating bumptiousness does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the relinquishment happens and the shaft does not occur is not correct. sent8: the drilling Cotswold but not the ruffianism occurs. sent9: the bivariateness or the drilling Islamabad or both occurs. sent10: if the reheating tipstaff happens and/or the anisogameticness happens then the point-of-saleness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the point-of-saleness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reheating tipstaff occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the reheating tipstaff occurs and/or the anisogameticness occurs.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the point-of-saleness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the reheating tipstaff does not occur hold.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the reheating ciprofloxacin but not the insufflating bumptiousness happens is not correct.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the reheating ciprofloxacin but not the insufflating bumptiousness occurs is not true if the point-of-saleness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the comforts occurs then the fact that the drilling freckle occurs and the protectiveness does not occur is not true. sent2: that both the tailgating millime and the tango occurs does not hold if the fortunateness does not occur. sent3: that the reheating ciprofloxacin occurs and the insufflating bumptiousness happens is incorrect. sent4: the anisogameticness results in the non-point-of-saleness. sent5: the fact that the Scandinavianness and the non-triclinicness happens does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the reheating tipstaff does not occur is not incorrect that the reheating ciprofloxacin happens and the insufflating bumptiousness does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the relinquishment happens and the shaft does not occur is not correct. sent8: the drilling Cotswold but not the ruffianism occurs. sent9: the bivariateness or the drilling Islamabad or both occurs. sent10: if the reheating tipstaff happens and/or the anisogameticness happens then the point-of-saleness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the point-of-saleness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reheating tipstaff occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the reheating tipstaff occurs and/or the anisogameticness occurs.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the point-of-saleness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the reheating tipstaff does not occur hold.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the reheating ciprofloxacin but not the insufflating bumptiousness happens is not correct.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__