the airfoil is a Luther and does insufflate adenosine.
sent1: the endoparasite does reheat insentience if the airfoil is nidicolous. sent2: the endoparasite is an abbot if the airfoil is a fucoid. sent3: the airfoil reheats insentience if it is not a fucoid. sent4: The adenosine insufflates airfoil. sent5: the fact that something is a mixer but it is not unshockable is not correct if it clocks. sent6: the aeschynanthus is a diemaker. sent7: the accountant is a clock if the fact that it is both not a clock and not a cuddle does not hold. sent8: if the airfoil is a diemaker then it is a Luther. sent9: the accountant is nidicolous if the fact that the mahoe is nidicolous is true. sent10: if that the airfoil is nidicolous is correct it is a diemaker. sent11: that if the airfoil is the diemaker the airfoil is an abbot is right. sent12: if something reheats insentience then it is a diemaker. sent13: the endoparasite is not a fucoid if that the dimenhydrinate is a kind of an abbot that is a fucoid does not hold. sent14: the fact that the accountant does not clock and it does not cuddle is wrong. sent15: the fact that the dimenhydrinate is a kind of an abbot and it is a kind of a fucoid is false if the accountant does not reheat insentience. sent16: the mahoe does reheat suffragan and it is nidicolous. sent17: the endoparasite is not a kind of an abbot and is not nidicolous. sent18: if that the fact that something is both a mixer and not unshockable is not incorrect is incorrect then it is not a kind of a diemaker. sent19: the endoparasite is not nidicolous. sent20: something does not reheat insentience if it is nidicolous and is not a diemaker.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airfoil is a kind of a fucoid.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the endoparasite is an abbot.; sent17 -> int2: the endoparasite is not an abbot.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the airfoil is not a kind of a fucoid.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the airfoil does reheat insentience.; sent12 -> int6: the airfoil is a diemaker if it does reheat insentience.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the airfoil is a diemaker hold.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the airfoil is a Luther.;
that the airfoil is a Luther that does insufflate adenosine is incorrect.
sent20 -> int9: if the accountant is nidicolous but it is not a kind of a diemaker then the fact that it does not reheat insentience is not wrong.; sent16 -> int10: the mahoe is not non-nidicolous.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the accountant is nidicolous hold.; sent18 -> int12: if the fact that the fact that the accountant is both a mixer and not unshockable hold does not hold then it is not a diemaker.; sent5 -> int13: the fact that the accountant is a kind of a mixer that is not unshockable is not true if it does clock.; sent7 & sent14 -> int14: the accountant is a clock.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the accountant is a mixer that is not unshockable is not correct.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the accountant is not a diemaker.; int11 & int16 -> int17: the accountant is both nidicolous and not a diemaker.; int9 & int17 -> int18: that the accountant does not reheat insentience is true.; sent15 & int18 -> int19: that the dimenhydrinate is an abbot and it is a fucoid is not true.; sent13 & int19 -> int20: the endoparasite is not a fucoid.; int20 -> int21: something is not a fucoid.;
$hypothesis$ = the airfoil is a Luther and does insufflate adenosine. ; $context$ = sent1: the endoparasite does reheat insentience if the airfoil is nidicolous. sent2: the endoparasite is an abbot if the airfoil is a fucoid. sent3: the airfoil reheats insentience if it is not a fucoid. sent4: The adenosine insufflates airfoil. sent5: the fact that something is a mixer but it is not unshockable is not correct if it clocks. sent6: the aeschynanthus is a diemaker. sent7: the accountant is a clock if the fact that it is both not a clock and not a cuddle does not hold. sent8: if the airfoil is a diemaker then it is a Luther. sent9: the accountant is nidicolous if the fact that the mahoe is nidicolous is true. sent10: if that the airfoil is nidicolous is correct it is a diemaker. sent11: that if the airfoil is the diemaker the airfoil is an abbot is right. sent12: if something reheats insentience then it is a diemaker. sent13: the endoparasite is not a fucoid if that the dimenhydrinate is a kind of an abbot that is a fucoid does not hold. sent14: the fact that the accountant does not clock and it does not cuddle is wrong. sent15: the fact that the dimenhydrinate is a kind of an abbot and it is a kind of a fucoid is false if the accountant does not reheat insentience. sent16: the mahoe does reheat suffragan and it is nidicolous. sent17: the endoparasite is not a kind of an abbot and is not nidicolous. sent18: if that the fact that something is both a mixer and not unshockable is not incorrect is incorrect then it is not a kind of a diemaker. sent19: the endoparasite is not nidicolous. sent20: something does not reheat insentience if it is nidicolous and is not a diemaker. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airfoil is a kind of a fucoid.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the endoparasite is an abbot.; sent17 -> int2: the endoparasite is not an abbot.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the airfoil is not a kind of a fucoid.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the airfoil does reheat insentience.; sent12 -> int6: the airfoil is a diemaker if it does reheat insentience.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the airfoil is a diemaker hold.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the airfoil is a Luther.; __UNKNOWN__