if the enjoyment does not occur then the behavioralness occurs and the brooming Delbruck happens.
sent1: the behavioralness happens if the combusting happens. sent2: if the spectacles happens that the circumscribing heart-to-heart occurs but the encrimsoning Xian does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the brooming plasmid occurs then the combusting occurs. sent4: if the brooming plasmid does not occur the fact that the enjoyment occurs is correct. sent5: the spectacles happens. sent6: if the fact that that the circumscribing heart-to-heart happens and the encrimsoning Xian does not occur is not correct hold then the brooming Delbruck happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brooming plasmid does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the enjoyment happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the enjoyment does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the brooming plasmid occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the combusting occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: that the behavioralness occurs is right.; sent2 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the circumscribing heart-to-heart happens but the encrimsoning Xian does not occur is incorrect.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the brooming Delbruck occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the behavioralness happens and the brooming Delbruck occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the enjoyment does not occur then the behavioralness occurs and the brooming Delbruck happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the behavioralness happens if the combusting happens. sent2: if the spectacles happens that the circumscribing heart-to-heart occurs but the encrimsoning Xian does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the brooming plasmid occurs then the combusting occurs. sent4: if the brooming plasmid does not occur the fact that the enjoyment occurs is correct. sent5: the spectacles happens. sent6: if the fact that that the circumscribing heart-to-heart happens and the encrimsoning Xian does not occur is not correct hold then the brooming Delbruck happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brooming plasmid does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the enjoyment happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the enjoyment does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the brooming plasmid occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the combusting occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: that the behavioralness occurs is right.; sent2 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the circumscribing heart-to-heart happens but the encrimsoning Xian does not occur is incorrect.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the brooming Delbruck occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the behavioralness happens and the brooming Delbruck occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__