the fact that the placket does not pique Parnell is not wrong.
sent1: the half-length is not a Maryland. sent2: that the placket does not pique Platycephalidae and it is not a unevenness does not hold if the surfboard is a marshmallow. sent3: the placket does not pique Parnell if that the cellblock piques Platycephalidae and it is a marshmallow is wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a detox that is a marshmallow then the vicinity piques Platycephalidae. sent5: the half-length is not a pinole and it does not bind flotsam if that it is a Maryland is false. sent6: if the surfboard piques Parnell then the placket does piques Parnell. sent7: the cellblock does not rhyme if it does not end. sent8: the vicinity is not a detox. sent9: the surfboard does pique Parnell and/or it is a unevenness if there is something such that it piques Platycephalidae. sent10: the vicinity is not a dollhouse if it is not a detox. sent11: the fact that the vicinity is monovalent and does pique Platycephalidae is incorrect if the cellblock is not a detox. sent12: if that something is eyeless is not wrong then it is a marshmallow. sent13: if something is a kind of a detox it is a kind of a marshmallow. sent14: the fact that the vicinity is both a dollhouse and monovalent is not correct. sent15: the fact that the vicinity is both not a dollhouse and not non-monovalent does not hold if the surfboard is a unevenness. sent16: the fact that the vicinity is a dollhouse and it is monovalent is not true if the surfboard is a unevenness. sent17: something is eyeless or skinless or both. sent18: if the cellblock is not a dollhouse then it is non-monovalent thing that piques Platycephalidae. sent19: if the fact that something does not pique Platycephalidae and is not a unevenness is false then it piques Parnell. sent20: the fact that the vicinity is monovalent thing that does pique Parnell is not true. sent21: if the cellblock does not pique Platycephalidae the placket does not pique Parnell. sent22: the vicinity is not a dollhouse but it is monovalent if it is not a kind of a detox. sent23: if the surfboard is not a unevenness then that the cellblock piques Platycephalidae and is a kind of a marshmallow is wrong. sent24: the vicinity is not a dollhouse.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the surfboard is a unevenness hold.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: that the vicinity is both not a dollhouse and monovalent does not hold.; sent22 & sent8 -> int2: the vicinity is not a kind of a dollhouse but it is not non-monovalent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the surfboard is not a unevenness.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: that the cellblock does pique Platycephalidae and is a marshmallow is false.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the placket does pique Parnell.
sent5 & sent1 -> int6: the half-length is not a pinole and it does not bind flotsam.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a pinole and it does not bind flotsam.; sent12 -> int8: the cellblock is a marshmallow if it is not non-eyeless.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the placket does not pique Parnell is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the half-length is not a Maryland. sent2: that the placket does not pique Platycephalidae and it is not a unevenness does not hold if the surfboard is a marshmallow. sent3: the placket does not pique Parnell if that the cellblock piques Platycephalidae and it is a marshmallow is wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a detox that is a marshmallow then the vicinity piques Platycephalidae. sent5: the half-length is not a pinole and it does not bind flotsam if that it is a Maryland is false. sent6: if the surfboard piques Parnell then the placket does piques Parnell. sent7: the cellblock does not rhyme if it does not end. sent8: the vicinity is not a detox. sent9: the surfboard does pique Parnell and/or it is a unevenness if there is something such that it piques Platycephalidae. sent10: the vicinity is not a dollhouse if it is not a detox. sent11: the fact that the vicinity is monovalent and does pique Platycephalidae is incorrect if the cellblock is not a detox. sent12: if that something is eyeless is not wrong then it is a marshmallow. sent13: if something is a kind of a detox it is a kind of a marshmallow. sent14: the fact that the vicinity is both a dollhouse and monovalent is not correct. sent15: the fact that the vicinity is both not a dollhouse and not non-monovalent does not hold if the surfboard is a unevenness. sent16: the fact that the vicinity is a dollhouse and it is monovalent is not true if the surfboard is a unevenness. sent17: something is eyeless or skinless or both. sent18: if the cellblock is not a dollhouse then it is non-monovalent thing that piques Platycephalidae. sent19: if the fact that something does not pique Platycephalidae and is not a unevenness is false then it piques Parnell. sent20: the fact that the vicinity is monovalent thing that does pique Parnell is not true. sent21: if the cellblock does not pique Platycephalidae the placket does not pique Parnell. sent22: the vicinity is not a dollhouse but it is monovalent if it is not a kind of a detox. sent23: if the surfboard is not a unevenness then that the cellblock piques Platycephalidae and is a kind of a marshmallow is wrong. sent24: the vicinity is not a dollhouse. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the surfboard is a unevenness hold.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: that the vicinity is both not a dollhouse and monovalent does not hold.; sent22 & sent8 -> int2: the vicinity is not a kind of a dollhouse but it is not non-monovalent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the surfboard is not a unevenness.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: that the cellblock does pique Platycephalidae and is a marshmallow is false.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__