the airport is not an incumbency and not seedy.
sent1: if that the airport is not seedy is not false then it is not virile. sent2: if something is not virile it is a danseur that does not damp intensity. sent3: the Omaha is not seedy. sent4: there is something such that it is virile. sent5: the Omaha does not cluster. sent6: there exists something such that it is virile and it is not a danseur. sent7: something does not damp intensity if it does not cluster. sent8: if something does not cluster it is virile and does not damp intensity. sent9: the Omaha does not damp intensity if it is not a danseur. sent10: the airport is not an incumbency and it is not seedy if the connection is not a danseur. sent11: if the airport is not a danseur then the connection is not seedy and does not cluster. sent12: the airport is non-virile. sent13: the Omaha is both not a danseur and non-seedy if the airport does not cluster. sent14: the connection is not a danseur if something that is virile does not damp intensity. sent15: the connection is not a kind of a danseur if it is not virile. sent16: if the connection is not a danseur then that the airport is not a kind of an incumbency is true. sent17: the Omaha does not damp intensity. sent18: there is something such that it is not an incumbency. sent19: that the airport is not an incumbency and it is not seedy is not true if the connection clusters. sent20: if the Omaha does not damp intensity then it is a kind of an incumbency that is not seedy.
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the Omaha does not cluster is correct then it is a kind of virile thing that does not damp intensity.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the Omaha is a kind of virile thing that does not damp intensity.; int2 -> int3: something is virile and does not damp intensity.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the connection is not a danseur.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the airport is both not an incumbency and not seedy is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the airport is not an incumbency and not seedy. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the airport is not seedy is not false then it is not virile. sent2: if something is not virile it is a danseur that does not damp intensity. sent3: the Omaha is not seedy. sent4: there is something such that it is virile. sent5: the Omaha does not cluster. sent6: there exists something such that it is virile and it is not a danseur. sent7: something does not damp intensity if it does not cluster. sent8: if something does not cluster it is virile and does not damp intensity. sent9: the Omaha does not damp intensity if it is not a danseur. sent10: the airport is not an incumbency and it is not seedy if the connection is not a danseur. sent11: if the airport is not a danseur then the connection is not seedy and does not cluster. sent12: the airport is non-virile. sent13: the Omaha is both not a danseur and non-seedy if the airport does not cluster. sent14: the connection is not a danseur if something that is virile does not damp intensity. sent15: the connection is not a kind of a danseur if it is not virile. sent16: if the connection is not a danseur then that the airport is not a kind of an incumbency is true. sent17: the Omaha does not damp intensity. sent18: there is something such that it is not an incumbency. sent19: that the airport is not an incumbency and it is not seedy is not true if the connection clusters. sent20: if the Omaha does not damp intensity then it is a kind of an incumbency that is not seedy. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the Omaha does not cluster is correct then it is a kind of virile thing that does not damp intensity.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the Omaha is a kind of virile thing that does not damp intensity.; int2 -> int3: something is virile and does not damp intensity.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the connection is not a danseur.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__