that the distrustfulness happens causes that the detriment does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the depriving float does not occur and the conniving does not occur is not right if the narrating Hendrix does not occur. sent2: if that the distrustfulness and the pin occurs is incorrect then the fact that the distrustfulness occurs is not right. sent3: that the difference occurs and the distrustfulness happens leads to that the detriment does not occur. sent4: that the spangling does not occur is caused by the anguineness. sent5: that the repatriation happens brings about that the mentalness occurs. sent6: the impeaching does not occur if the fact that the depriving float does not occur and the conniving does not occur is not right. sent7: the ampullarness occurs. sent8: the detriment occurs. sent9: the narrating buffeted happens if that the narrating buffeted does not occur and the difference does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the improvidentness but not the detriment occurs then that the thwack occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the impregnation does not occur. sent12: that the impeaching does not occur results in that the improvidentness occurs but the detriment does not occur. sent13: that the narrating buffeted does not occur and the difference does not occur is wrong if the distrustfulness does not occur. sent14: if the difference and the distrustfulness happens then the detriment occurs. sent15: that the stocktaking does not occur yields that the unsanitariness happens and the narrating Hendrix does not occur. sent16: if the distrustfulness occurs the detriment happens. sent17: the fact that the distrustfulness occurs and the pinning happens does not hold if the backingness does not occur. sent18: that the mentalness and/or the upholstery happens prevents the stocktaking. sent19: the depriving Calymmatobacterium happens.
the thwack and the narrating buffeted happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the distrustfulness happens causes that the detriment does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the depriving float does not occur and the conniving does not occur is not right if the narrating Hendrix does not occur. sent2: if that the distrustfulness and the pin occurs is incorrect then the fact that the distrustfulness occurs is not right. sent3: that the difference occurs and the distrustfulness happens leads to that the detriment does not occur. sent4: that the spangling does not occur is caused by the anguineness. sent5: that the repatriation happens brings about that the mentalness occurs. sent6: the impeaching does not occur if the fact that the depriving float does not occur and the conniving does not occur is not right. sent7: the ampullarness occurs. sent8: the detriment occurs. sent9: the narrating buffeted happens if that the narrating buffeted does not occur and the difference does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the improvidentness but not the detriment occurs then that the thwack occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the impregnation does not occur. sent12: that the impeaching does not occur results in that the improvidentness occurs but the detriment does not occur. sent13: that the narrating buffeted does not occur and the difference does not occur is wrong if the distrustfulness does not occur. sent14: if the difference and the distrustfulness happens then the detriment occurs. sent15: that the stocktaking does not occur yields that the unsanitariness happens and the narrating Hendrix does not occur. sent16: if the distrustfulness occurs the detriment happens. sent17: the fact that the distrustfulness occurs and the pinning happens does not hold if the backingness does not occur. sent18: that the mentalness and/or the upholstery happens prevents the stocktaking. sent19: the depriving Calymmatobacterium happens. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__