that there exists something such that if the fact that it is both not a whist and not neoclassicist is wrong then it is a Cartwright is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is not a whist but a neoclassicist is not true then the fact that it is not a Cartwright does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a whist and it is not a neoclassicist is incorrect it is a Cartwright. sent3: the homespun is a kind of a Cartwright if that it is not a whist and is a neoclassicist is not correct. sent4: that if the plimsoll is the Phoebe then the plimsoll gloms homespun is not false. sent5: the fact that the homespun is a Cartwright hold if that it is not a whist and is not a kind of a neoclassicist is incorrect. sent6: something is Noachian if that it is not editorial and it is not partitive is false. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a whist and not neoclassicist it is a kind of a Cartwright. sent8: the clover is apophatic if the fact that the fact that it is not a umber and it does not glom homespun is true is not correct. sent9: the homespun is Noachian if the fact that it does not bespangle and is not a councillorship is not right. sent10: if the homespun is both not a whist and not a neoclassicist then it is a Cartwright. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a neoclassicist it is a Cartwright. sent12: if the homespun is a kind of a neoclassicist then it is a cetacean.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is non-editorial and it is not a partitive is incorrect it is Noachian.
sent6 -> int1: the chiaroscuro is Noachian if the fact that it is not editorial and is not a partitive does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is both not a whist and not neoclassicist is wrong then it is a Cartwright is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is not a whist but a neoclassicist is not true then the fact that it is not a Cartwright does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a whist and it is not a neoclassicist is incorrect it is a Cartwright. sent3: the homespun is a kind of a Cartwright if that it is not a whist and is a neoclassicist is not correct. sent4: that if the plimsoll is the Phoebe then the plimsoll gloms homespun is not false. sent5: the fact that the homespun is a Cartwright hold if that it is not a whist and is not a kind of a neoclassicist is incorrect. sent6: something is Noachian if that it is not editorial and it is not partitive is false. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a whist and not neoclassicist it is a kind of a Cartwright. sent8: the clover is apophatic if the fact that the fact that it is not a umber and it does not glom homespun is true is not correct. sent9: the homespun is Noachian if the fact that it does not bespangle and is not a councillorship is not right. sent10: if the homespun is both not a whist and not a neoclassicist then it is a Cartwright. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a neoclassicist it is a Cartwright. sent12: if the homespun is a kind of a neoclassicist then it is a cetacean. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__