the appealableness does not occur.
sent1: the slaving ibex happens. sent2: the pump does not occur if both the bottomlessness and the punting happens. sent3: the fact that both the gunning and the bestirring VFW occurs is false if the psychiatricness does not occur. sent4: the pumping occurs if the gainer occurs. sent5: if that the bottomlessness does not occur and the designating does not occur does not hold the designating occurs. sent6: the bestirring VFW does not occur and the gainer happens. sent7: that if that the gun occurs and the bestirring VFW happens is not correct the bestirring VFW does not occur is not wrong. sent8: that the bottomlessness occurs is not incorrect if the bottomlessness occurs or the disjunctness does not occur or both. sent9: the fact that the liquefying Sistrurus does not occur and the holisticness occurs does not hold. sent10: if the appealableness happens the punting happens. sent11: the psychiatricness does not occur if that the liquefying Sistrurus does not occur and the holisticness occurs is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appealableness happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the punting occurs.; sent6 -> int2: the gainer occurs.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the pumping happens.;
the slaving heist and the designating happens.
sent11 & sent9 -> int4: the psychiatricness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that both the gun and the bestirring VFW happens does not hold.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: that the bestirring VFW does not occur hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the appealableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the slaving ibex happens. sent2: the pump does not occur if both the bottomlessness and the punting happens. sent3: the fact that both the gunning and the bestirring VFW occurs is false if the psychiatricness does not occur. sent4: the pumping occurs if the gainer occurs. sent5: if that the bottomlessness does not occur and the designating does not occur does not hold the designating occurs. sent6: the bestirring VFW does not occur and the gainer happens. sent7: that if that the gun occurs and the bestirring VFW happens is not correct the bestirring VFW does not occur is not wrong. sent8: that the bottomlessness occurs is not incorrect if the bottomlessness occurs or the disjunctness does not occur or both. sent9: the fact that the liquefying Sistrurus does not occur and the holisticness occurs does not hold. sent10: if the appealableness happens the punting happens. sent11: the psychiatricness does not occur if that the liquefying Sistrurus does not occur and the holisticness occurs is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appealableness happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the punting occurs.; sent6 -> int2: the gainer occurs.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the pumping happens.; __UNKNOWN__