the namby-pamby is not a workspace.
sent1: the fragmentation is a surfeit if the shipwright does discountenance Pawnee. sent2: if that the namby-pamby is not a surfeit and it is not a workspace is not true then the instillator is a naphazoline. sent3: the fragmentation is oleophilic if it does not discountenance Pawnee and it is a rail. sent4: if something is both a tiyin and a surfeit then it is not a workspace. sent5: the fact that the instillator is not a naphazoline and not a corkboard is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the fragmentation surfeits is not false if the shipwright surfeits. sent7: if that something is not a surfeit but it is a tiyin does not hold it is a kind of a corkboard. sent8: the fragmentation is a tiyin if the fact that the instillator is not a kind of a naphazoline and it is not a corkboard is incorrect. sent9: the shipwright does discountenance Pawnee and/or it surfeits. sent10: the namby-pamby is a kind of oleophilic a workspace if the fragmentation is not a kind of a workspace. sent11: the fragmentation does not discountenance Pawnee but it is a kind of a rail. sent12: the fact that if that something is oleophilic is not false that the instillator is perineal but it is not a workspace is incorrect is not false.
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: that the fragmentation is a tiyin is correct.; sent9 & sent1 & sent6 -> int2: the fragmentation is a surfeit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fragmentation is a kind of a tiyin that is a surfeit.; sent4 -> int4: if the fragmentation is a tiyin and is a surfeit then it is not a workspace.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fragmentation is not a workspace.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the namby-pamby is oleophilic and it is a workspace.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dracaena is a corkboard is not false.
sent7 -> int7: the fact that the dracaena is the corkboard if the fact that the dracaena is not a kind of a surfeit but it is a tiyin is incorrect is not false.; sent3 & sent11 -> int8: the fragmentation is oleophilic.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is oleophilic.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: that the instillator is a kind of perineal thing that is not a workspace is false.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is perineal and it is not a workspace is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the namby-pamby is not a workspace. ; $context$ = sent1: the fragmentation is a surfeit if the shipwright does discountenance Pawnee. sent2: if that the namby-pamby is not a surfeit and it is not a workspace is not true then the instillator is a naphazoline. sent3: the fragmentation is oleophilic if it does not discountenance Pawnee and it is a rail. sent4: if something is both a tiyin and a surfeit then it is not a workspace. sent5: the fact that the instillator is not a naphazoline and not a corkboard is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the fragmentation surfeits is not false if the shipwright surfeits. sent7: if that something is not a surfeit but it is a tiyin does not hold it is a kind of a corkboard. sent8: the fragmentation is a tiyin if the fact that the instillator is not a kind of a naphazoline and it is not a corkboard is incorrect. sent9: the shipwright does discountenance Pawnee and/or it surfeits. sent10: the namby-pamby is a kind of oleophilic a workspace if the fragmentation is not a kind of a workspace. sent11: the fragmentation does not discountenance Pawnee but it is a kind of a rail. sent12: the fact that if that something is oleophilic is not false that the instillator is perineal but it is not a workspace is incorrect is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: that the fragmentation is a tiyin is correct.; sent9 & sent1 & sent6 -> int2: the fragmentation is a surfeit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fragmentation is a kind of a tiyin that is a surfeit.; sent4 -> int4: if the fragmentation is a tiyin and is a surfeit then it is not a workspace.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fragmentation is not a workspace.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the namby-pamby is oleophilic and it is a workspace.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__