that the organism is undemonstrative but it is not doubling is not correct.
sent1: the organism is a kind of a tug-of-war and it is a gamine if the trellis is not a bidet. sent2: something is a gamine. sent3: the fact that the trellis is not the gamine if the trellis is both not a apothecium and a BMDO is not incorrect. sent4: the cine-film is belemnitic if the fact that the gurney is not a laryngospasm but it is belemnitic is false. sent5: if something is not a kind of a tug-of-war that it is not a gamine and is a kind of a doubling does not hold. sent6: the trellis is a kind of a BMDO. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a BMDO. sent8: the trellis is both not a apothecium and a BMDO. sent9: the fact that the radial is not a concession and updates storehouse is not right if the cine-film is belemnitic. sent10: if the twins is non-photoconductive then it is a laryngospasm and is a black. sent11: there is something such that it is not undemonstrative. sent12: the organism is undemonstrative but it does not double if there exists something such that it is not a gamine. sent13: the trellis is not a bidet if that the radial is not a concession and updates storehouse is not true. sent14: the fact that the organism is undemonstrative but it is not a apothecium hold if there is something such that the fact that it is not a gamine is right. sent15: if something is a gamine then that it is undemonstrative and it is not a doubling is not correct. sent16: the organism is not a thirtieth but it is a dermabrasion.
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the trellis is not a kind of a gamine.; int1 -> int2: something is not a kind of a gamine.; int2 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the organism is undemonstrative but not a doubling is not right.
sent15 -> int3: if the organism is a kind of a gamine the fact that it is undemonstrative and it is not a doubling is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the organism is undemonstrative but it is not doubling is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the organism is a kind of a tug-of-war and it is a gamine if the trellis is not a bidet. sent2: something is a gamine. sent3: the fact that the trellis is not the gamine if the trellis is both not a apothecium and a BMDO is not incorrect. sent4: the cine-film is belemnitic if the fact that the gurney is not a laryngospasm but it is belemnitic is false. sent5: if something is not a kind of a tug-of-war that it is not a gamine and is a kind of a doubling does not hold. sent6: the trellis is a kind of a BMDO. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a BMDO. sent8: the trellis is both not a apothecium and a BMDO. sent9: the fact that the radial is not a concession and updates storehouse is not right if the cine-film is belemnitic. sent10: if the twins is non-photoconductive then it is a laryngospasm and is a black. sent11: there is something such that it is not undemonstrative. sent12: the organism is undemonstrative but it does not double if there exists something such that it is not a gamine. sent13: the trellis is not a bidet if that the radial is not a concession and updates storehouse is not true. sent14: the fact that the organism is undemonstrative but it is not a apothecium hold if there is something such that the fact that it is not a gamine is right. sent15: if something is a gamine then that it is undemonstrative and it is not a doubling is not correct. sent16: the organism is not a thirtieth but it is a dermabrasion. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the trellis is not a kind of a gamine.; int1 -> int2: something is not a kind of a gamine.; int2 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__