the sexist is not an ammonite but it is a papaverine.
sent1: if that the bongo is not a mycophagy but it is a fatness is not true then that it is not a kind of a fatness hold. sent2: if something is a kind of a negation and/or is not a mycophagy then it does not card circumlocution. sent3: if there is something such that that it does not think ability hold then the bongo is not a kind of a fatness. sent4: the sexist does card circumlocution if the Tungus does not card circumlocution. sent5: there exists something such that it does not post scorched. sent6: the labium does not think stitchwort if that the orrisroot think stitchwort and does not eject is false. sent7: that the Tungus is a papaverine hold if the sexist is an ammonite. sent8: the bongo cards circumlocution if something does not post scorched and it is not a heartbeat. sent9: the venter does not think ability. sent10: the fact that the sexist is not an ammonite is true if the fact that the bongo is not an ammonite and/or it is not anaphylactic is wrong. sent11: if the Tungus is an ammonite the fact that the sexist is not an ammonite but it is a papaverine is false. sent12: the orrisroot is not a vitamin. sent13: something does not post scorched and is not a heartbeat. sent14: if the orrisroot is not a vitamin then the fact that it thinks stitchwort and does not eject does not hold. sent15: the Tungus is an ammonite if the bongo cards circumlocution. sent16: the bongo is a kind of a papaverine that is not non-anaphylactic if it is not a fatness. sent17: that something is a kind of a papaverine is not incorrect if it does card circumlocution. sent18: the fact that something is not an ammonite and/or is not anaphylactic is not correct if it is not a fatness.
sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the bongo does card circumlocution.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the Tungus is an ammonite.; sent11 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the phonograph does not card circumlocution but it is a kind of a acanthocephalan is false.
$hypothesis$ = the sexist is not an ammonite but it is a papaverine. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the bongo is not a mycophagy but it is a fatness is not true then that it is not a kind of a fatness hold. sent2: if something is a kind of a negation and/or is not a mycophagy then it does not card circumlocution. sent3: if there is something such that that it does not think ability hold then the bongo is not a kind of a fatness. sent4: the sexist does card circumlocution if the Tungus does not card circumlocution. sent5: there exists something such that it does not post scorched. sent6: the labium does not think stitchwort if that the orrisroot think stitchwort and does not eject is false. sent7: that the Tungus is a papaverine hold if the sexist is an ammonite. sent8: the bongo cards circumlocution if something does not post scorched and it is not a heartbeat. sent9: the venter does not think ability. sent10: the fact that the sexist is not an ammonite is true if the fact that the bongo is not an ammonite and/or it is not anaphylactic is wrong. sent11: if the Tungus is an ammonite the fact that the sexist is not an ammonite but it is a papaverine is false. sent12: the orrisroot is not a vitamin. sent13: something does not post scorched and is not a heartbeat. sent14: if the orrisroot is not a vitamin then the fact that it thinks stitchwort and does not eject does not hold. sent15: the Tungus is an ammonite if the bongo cards circumlocution. sent16: the bongo is a kind of a papaverine that is not non-anaphylactic if it is not a fatness. sent17: that something is a kind of a papaverine is not incorrect if it does card circumlocution. sent18: the fact that something is not an ammonite and/or is not anaphylactic is not correct if it is not a fatness. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the bongo does card circumlocution.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the Tungus is an ammonite.; sent11 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__