the genet does bestrew roundtable and it bestrews miss.
sent1: something is not an internist if the fact that it does not bestrew Bennington and is a kind of an internist is incorrect. sent2: the gumbo-limbo does not bestrew miss if that it is not a kind of an internist and is not exilic does not hold. sent3: the gumbo-limbo is a kind of an internist. sent4: the fact that the genet does not tarry and it is not an internist is not right. sent5: that the candle is not lexicostatistics and is not a kind of an adversity is not true. sent6: the genet does bestrew miss if the gumbo-limbo does not bestrew miss. sent7: that the gumbo-limbo is not an internist but it is exilic is false. sent8: the gumbo-limbo is not exilic. sent9: that the antiparticle is not an internist and is not a Yankee is not false. sent10: the genet bestrews miss. sent11: if something is not an internist that it does bestrew roundtable and does bestrew miss is not correct. sent12: if the gumbo-limbo is exilic it does not bestrew miss.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gumbo-limbo is not a kind of an internist and it is not exilic.; assump1 -> int1: the gumbo-limbo is not an internist.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the gumbo-limbo is not an internist and it is not exilic is not true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the gumbo-limbo does not bestrew miss is not false.;
the fact that the genet bestrews roundtable and it does bestrew miss is wrong.
sent11 -> int5: that the genet does bestrew roundtable and bestrews miss is incorrect if it is not an internist.; sent1 -> int6: the genet is not an internist if the fact that the fact that it does not bestrew Bennington and is a kind of an internist is not false is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the genet does bestrew roundtable and it bestrews miss. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not an internist if the fact that it does not bestrew Bennington and is a kind of an internist is incorrect. sent2: the gumbo-limbo does not bestrew miss if that it is not a kind of an internist and is not exilic does not hold. sent3: the gumbo-limbo is a kind of an internist. sent4: the fact that the genet does not tarry and it is not an internist is not right. sent5: that the candle is not lexicostatistics and is not a kind of an adversity is not true. sent6: the genet does bestrew miss if the gumbo-limbo does not bestrew miss. sent7: that the gumbo-limbo is not an internist but it is exilic is false. sent8: the gumbo-limbo is not exilic. sent9: that the antiparticle is not an internist and is not a Yankee is not false. sent10: the genet bestrews miss. sent11: if something is not an internist that it does bestrew roundtable and does bestrew miss is not correct. sent12: if the gumbo-limbo is exilic it does not bestrew miss. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gumbo-limbo is not a kind of an internist and it is not exilic.; assump1 -> int1: the gumbo-limbo is not an internist.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the gumbo-limbo is not an internist and it is not exilic is not true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the gumbo-limbo does not bestrew miss is not false.; __UNKNOWN__