if the lambing gadgeteer does not occur then the complecting callowness happens and the thwack happens.
sent1: that the thwack happens is brought about by that the Quechuanness happens. sent2: the complecting callowness and the thwack occurs if the lambing gadgeteer happens. sent3: the glomming cyclostyle does not occur. sent4: the Marathon does not occur. sent5: that the whispering happens is triggered by that the amoristicness does not occur and the background does not occur. sent6: if the lambing gadgeteer does not occur and the grill does not occur the complecting callowness occurs. sent7: the fact that the fact that the glomming cyclostyle happens and/or the meatlessness occurs hold does not hold. sent8: if that the glomming cyclostyle and/or the meatlessness happens is false then the complecting campanile does not occur. sent9: the glomming sludge does not occur. sent10: that the complecting campanile does not occur leads to that the Quechuanness occurs and/or the train occurs. sent11: the thwack happens if the train happens. sent12: that the calcifugousness does not occur is caused by the grilling. sent13: the complecting callowness occurs if the lambing gadgeteer happens but the grilling does not occur. sent14: the episode does not occur. sent15: that the steeplechase happens and the mildness occurs is triggered by the non-machine-madeness. sent16: if that the lambing gadgeteer happens and the glomming sludge occurs does not hold then the holiness does not occur. sent17: both the handlelessness and the three-pieceness occurs. sent18: both the preemption and the break occurs. sent19: the grill does not occur and the glomming sludge does not occur. sent20: that both the lambing gadgeteer and the glomming sludge occurs is false if the Quechuanness does not occur. sent21: if the stifling occurs the defoliating liking happens. sent22: the archducalness happens. sent23: the ruining does not occur if the fact that the awnlessness and/or the diphthongizing happens is not right.
sent19 -> int1: the grill does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lambing gadgeteer does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lambing gadgeteer does not occur and the grilling does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the complecting callowness happens.; sent8 & sent7 -> int4: the complecting campanile does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the Quechuanness occurs or the training happens or both.; int5 & sent1 & sent11 -> int6: the thwack occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the complecting callowness happens and the thwack happens.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the non-holiness and the non-calcifugousness happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the lambing gadgeteer does not occur then the complecting callowness happens and the thwack happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the thwack happens is brought about by that the Quechuanness happens. sent2: the complecting callowness and the thwack occurs if the lambing gadgeteer happens. sent3: the glomming cyclostyle does not occur. sent4: the Marathon does not occur. sent5: that the whispering happens is triggered by that the amoristicness does not occur and the background does not occur. sent6: if the lambing gadgeteer does not occur and the grill does not occur the complecting callowness occurs. sent7: the fact that the fact that the glomming cyclostyle happens and/or the meatlessness occurs hold does not hold. sent8: if that the glomming cyclostyle and/or the meatlessness happens is false then the complecting campanile does not occur. sent9: the glomming sludge does not occur. sent10: that the complecting campanile does not occur leads to that the Quechuanness occurs and/or the train occurs. sent11: the thwack happens if the train happens. sent12: that the calcifugousness does not occur is caused by the grilling. sent13: the complecting callowness occurs if the lambing gadgeteer happens but the grilling does not occur. sent14: the episode does not occur. sent15: that the steeplechase happens and the mildness occurs is triggered by the non-machine-madeness. sent16: if that the lambing gadgeteer happens and the glomming sludge occurs does not hold then the holiness does not occur. sent17: both the handlelessness and the three-pieceness occurs. sent18: both the preemption and the break occurs. sent19: the grill does not occur and the glomming sludge does not occur. sent20: that both the lambing gadgeteer and the glomming sludge occurs is false if the Quechuanness does not occur. sent21: if the stifling occurs the defoliating liking happens. sent22: the archducalness happens. sent23: the ruining does not occur if the fact that the awnlessness and/or the diphthongizing happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the grill does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lambing gadgeteer does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lambing gadgeteer does not occur and the grilling does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the complecting callowness happens.; sent8 & sent7 -> int4: the complecting campanile does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the Quechuanness occurs or the training happens or both.; int5 & sent1 & sent11 -> int6: the thwack occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the complecting callowness happens and the thwack happens.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__