the fact that the agave is autarchic thing that does not commercialize keratoscope is not correct.
sent1: if the agave is not a kind of a demineralization the sleeve is not autarchic. sent2: if the keratoscope is not a hyoid the sleeve is not a demineralization. sent3: the sleeve is not a demineralization if either the keratoscope does not commercialize Ptilonorhynchidae or it is not a kind of a hyoid or both. sent4: the agave is autarchic but it does not commercialize keratoscope if the sleeve is not a kind of a demineralization. sent5: the fact that the Scottie is a myope but it is not a kind of a reverse does not hold. sent6: the Scottie is reverse if that the fact that it is a myope and is not reverse is correct is not true. sent7: the Scottie bilks and is not a kind of a reverse if the keratoscope commercializes Ptilonorhynchidae.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the keratoscope does commercialize Ptilonorhynchidae.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Scottie does bilk and is not a kind of a reverse.; int1 -> int2: the Scottie is not a reverse.; sent6 & sent5 -> int3: the Scottie is a reverse.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the keratoscope does not commercialize Ptilonorhynchidae.; int5 -> int6: that the keratoscope does not commercialize Ptilonorhynchidae and/or it is not hyoid is not wrong.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the sleeve is not a demineralization.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the agave is autarchic thing that does not commercialize keratoscope is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the agave is not a kind of a demineralization the sleeve is not autarchic. sent2: if the keratoscope is not a hyoid the sleeve is not a demineralization. sent3: the sleeve is not a demineralization if either the keratoscope does not commercialize Ptilonorhynchidae or it is not a kind of a hyoid or both. sent4: the agave is autarchic but it does not commercialize keratoscope if the sleeve is not a kind of a demineralization. sent5: the fact that the Scottie is a myope but it is not a kind of a reverse does not hold. sent6: the Scottie is reverse if that the fact that it is a myope and is not reverse is correct is not true. sent7: the Scottie bilks and is not a kind of a reverse if the keratoscope commercializes Ptilonorhynchidae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the keratoscope does commercialize Ptilonorhynchidae.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Scottie does bilk and is not a kind of a reverse.; int1 -> int2: the Scottie is not a reverse.; sent6 & sent5 -> int3: the Scottie is a reverse.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the keratoscope does not commercialize Ptilonorhynchidae.; int5 -> int6: that the keratoscope does not commercialize Ptilonorhynchidae and/or it is not hyoid is not wrong.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the sleeve is not a demineralization.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__