the scapular is a kind of a roar.
sent1: that the scapular does realign cryolite but it is not orthoptic does not hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of an umbrage. sent2: the fact that the Perry is calcifugous and it does impeach is incorrect if there exists something such that it beads. sent3: the fact that that the fluosilicate manoeuvers and it is calcifugous is right is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is broad thing that does crash does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is calcifugous and it is electrostatic is not true the fact that the Perry is an umbrage is correct. sent6: something does not roar if the fact that that it does realign cryolite and it is not orthoptic is correct does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is calcifugous and it is electrostatic is false. sent8: if the fact that something is cerebrovascular thing that does not officialize nightshade does not hold then it does not elbow sounding. sent9: a no-go thing is not negligent. sent10: something is not pronounceable if that it is a Northerner that is not an absenteeism is not right. sent11: the scapular is not a roar if it is orthoptic.
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the Perry is a kind of an umbrage.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is an umbrage.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the scapular realigns cryolite and is not orthoptic is not true.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the scapular realigns cryolite but it is not orthoptic is not true it is not a kind of a roar.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the scapular is a kind of a roar. ; $context$ = sent1: that the scapular does realign cryolite but it is not orthoptic does not hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of an umbrage. sent2: the fact that the Perry is calcifugous and it does impeach is incorrect if there exists something such that it beads. sent3: the fact that that the fluosilicate manoeuvers and it is calcifugous is right is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is broad thing that does crash does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is calcifugous and it is electrostatic is not true the fact that the Perry is an umbrage is correct. sent6: something does not roar if the fact that that it does realign cryolite and it is not orthoptic is correct does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is calcifugous and it is electrostatic is false. sent8: if the fact that something is cerebrovascular thing that does not officialize nightshade does not hold then it does not elbow sounding. sent9: a no-go thing is not negligent. sent10: something is not pronounceable if that it is a Northerner that is not an absenteeism is not right. sent11: the scapular is not a roar if it is orthoptic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the Perry is a kind of an umbrage.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is an umbrage.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the scapular realigns cryolite and is not orthoptic is not true.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the scapular realigns cryolite but it is not orthoptic is not true it is not a kind of a roar.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__