the names is pessimistic.
sent1: that the fact that the ammoniac is a kind of an octogenarian that does bone fontanelle is false hold. sent2: there is something such that it does not whistle mullioned and is a photoelectricity. sent3: there is something such that it is not pessimistic. sent4: there exists something such that it does not whistle mullioned. sent5: the fact that the calcium does not firebomb lamentation and is non-peripteral is false if something is uninformative. sent6: if the krummhorn does not conk then the names is not pessimistic. sent7: if the fact that something is both not a conk and subsurface is false it is not pessimistic. sent8: that the viroid is a kind of non-mucinoid thing that is not a cirque does not hold if the ammoniac is a kind of a Argo. sent9: the schlepper is a kind of a Ingrian that is not a viscose if the submitter does not firebomb lamentation. sent10: if the krummhorn does not howl the fact that the names is not a conk and is subsurface is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a photoelectricity. sent12: if the fact that something is a kind of an octogenarian and it does bone fontanelle does not hold it does not bone fontanelle. sent13: there is something such that it whistles mullioned and is a kind of a photoelectricity. sent14: the names is pessimistic if that the krummhorn does conk is true. sent15: if something does not bone fontanelle then it is both a ray and a Argo. sent16: if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-mucinoid thing that is not a cirque does not hold then the cretonne is uninformative. sent17: if the fact that the calcium does not firebomb lamentation and it is not peripteral is not true then the submitter does not firebomb lamentation.
the names is not pessimistic.
$hypothesis$ = the names is pessimistic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the ammoniac is a kind of an octogenarian that does bone fontanelle is false hold. sent2: there is something such that it does not whistle mullioned and is a photoelectricity. sent3: there is something such that it is not pessimistic. sent4: there exists something such that it does not whistle mullioned. sent5: the fact that the calcium does not firebomb lamentation and is non-peripteral is false if something is uninformative. sent6: if the krummhorn does not conk then the names is not pessimistic. sent7: if the fact that something is both not a conk and subsurface is false it is not pessimistic. sent8: that the viroid is a kind of non-mucinoid thing that is not a cirque does not hold if the ammoniac is a kind of a Argo. sent9: the schlepper is a kind of a Ingrian that is not a viscose if the submitter does not firebomb lamentation. sent10: if the krummhorn does not howl the fact that the names is not a conk and is subsurface is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a photoelectricity. sent12: if the fact that something is a kind of an octogenarian and it does bone fontanelle does not hold it does not bone fontanelle. sent13: there is something such that it whistles mullioned and is a kind of a photoelectricity. sent14: the names is pessimistic if that the krummhorn does conk is true. sent15: if something does not bone fontanelle then it is both a ray and a Argo. sent16: if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-mucinoid thing that is not a cirque does not hold then the cretonne is uninformative. sent17: if the fact that the calcium does not firebomb lamentation and it is not peripteral is not true then the submitter does not firebomb lamentation. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__