that the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur is not right if the nominal happens.
sent1: the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur. sent2: if the nominal occurs the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur. sent3: if the vertebralness happens then the fact that the perversion but not the quiescence occurs is not right. sent4: if the nominal happens that the phosphorousness occurs and the mingling stocktaking does not occur is not correct. sent5: if the antipodal does not occur then that the fact that the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur is not wrong is not correct. sent6: if the vertebralness does not occur that the C-section does not occur and the reseeding does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the pricing chevrotain does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: if that the perversion does not occur and the quiescence does not occur is wrong the excluding barrator happens. sent9: the excluding barrator occurs if the perversion occurs. sent10: the fact that the phosphorousness occurs but the mingling stocktaking does not occur is false. sent11: the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur if the fact that the antipodal does not occur is correct. sent12: that the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking occurs does not hold. sent13: the fact that the perversion but not the quiescence occurs is not right. sent14: the nominalness does not occur if both the excluding barrator and the antipodal happens. sent15: the fact that the phosphorousness occurs and the mingling stocktaking does not occur does not hold if the antipodalness does not occur. sent16: that both the non-phosphorousness and the mingling stocktaking happens does not hold if the nominal occurs. sent17: the vertebralness occurs. sent18: if the vertebralness happens the fact that the perversion does not occur and the quiescence does not occur does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the antipodal occurs is false the fact that the non-phosphorousness and the mingling stocktaking occurs is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nominal happens.; sent18 & sent17 -> int1: that the perversion does not occur and the quiescence does not occur is not true.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the excluding barrator occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the antipodal occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: the excluding barrator occurs and the antipodalness occurs.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the nominalness does not occur.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the antipodalness does not occur.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur is not true.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the C-section does not occur and the reseeding does not occur does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur is not right if the nominal happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur. sent2: if the nominal occurs the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur. sent3: if the vertebralness happens then the fact that the perversion but not the quiescence occurs is not right. sent4: if the nominal happens that the phosphorousness occurs and the mingling stocktaking does not occur is not correct. sent5: if the antipodal does not occur then that the fact that the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur is not wrong is not correct. sent6: if the vertebralness does not occur that the C-section does not occur and the reseeding does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the pricing chevrotain does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: if that the perversion does not occur and the quiescence does not occur is wrong the excluding barrator happens. sent9: the excluding barrator occurs if the perversion occurs. sent10: the fact that the phosphorousness occurs but the mingling stocktaking does not occur is false. sent11: the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur if the fact that the antipodal does not occur is correct. sent12: that the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking occurs does not hold. sent13: the fact that the perversion but not the quiescence occurs is not right. sent14: the nominalness does not occur if both the excluding barrator and the antipodal happens. sent15: the fact that the phosphorousness occurs and the mingling stocktaking does not occur does not hold if the antipodalness does not occur. sent16: that both the non-phosphorousness and the mingling stocktaking happens does not hold if the nominal occurs. sent17: the vertebralness occurs. sent18: if the vertebralness happens the fact that the perversion does not occur and the quiescence does not occur does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the antipodal occurs is false the fact that the non-phosphorousness and the mingling stocktaking occurs is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nominal happens.; sent18 & sent17 -> int1: that the perversion does not occur and the quiescence does not occur is not true.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the excluding barrator occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the antipodal occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: the excluding barrator occurs and the antipodalness occurs.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the nominalness does not occur.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the antipodalness does not occur.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the phosphorousness does not occur and the mingling stocktaking does not occur is not true.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__