something contributes millenary and is not a aerophilately.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a politburo the ninepin contributes millenary. sent2: the platelayer is a kind of a politburo if the ninepin is not tidal and is a politburo. sent3: the airbrush is tidal. sent4: there exists something such that it does contribute millenary. sent5: the ninepin is not a padauk if the fact that it is a kind of a Oswald and it is a kind of a padauk does not hold. sent6: the airbrush is not a politburo if it bespangles apodeme. sent7: the ninepin is not nonprescription but it is not a kind of a Cherbourg. sent8: there is something such that it does contribute millenary and it is a kind of a aerophilately. sent9: something is not a politburo if it does bespangle apodeme. sent10: there is something such that it is a politburo. sent11: if something is tidal then that it does not bespangle apodeme and it does japan uropathy is incorrect. sent12: the airbrush is a kind of a gain. sent13: the ninepin does contribute millenary. sent14: if that something does not bespangle apodeme and japans uropathy is false then it is not a politburo. sent15: the airbrush contributes millenary and is not anticyclonic. sent16: the fact that the fact that the airbrush bespangles apodeme and does japan uropathy is not correct if the airbrush is not non-tidal is not wrong. sent17: the ninepin does contribute millenary and/or is not philosophical if it is not a kind of a padauk. sent18: the fact that something does bespangle apodeme and does japan uropathy is false if the fact that it is tidal is right. sent19: if something is not a politburo then the ninepin does contribute millenary but it is not a aerophilately. sent20: the fact that that the airbrush bespangles apodeme and it does japan uropathy does not hold is right. sent21: the ninepin japans uropathy but it does not bespangle apodeme if there is something such that it does not contribute millenary. sent22: the executive contributes millenary. sent23: there is something such that it is not a kind of a aerophilately.
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the airbrush does not bespangle apodeme and japans uropathy is not right if it is tidal.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the airbrush does not bespangle apodeme but it japans uropathy is wrong.; sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the airbrush does not bespangle apodeme but it japans uropathy is false then the fact that it is not a politburo is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the airbrush is not a kind of a politburo.; int4 -> int5: something is not a politburo.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the ninepin contributes millenary but it is not a kind of a aerophilately.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the platelayer is a politburo.
$hypothesis$ = something contributes millenary and is not a aerophilately. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a politburo the ninepin contributes millenary. sent2: the platelayer is a kind of a politburo if the ninepin is not tidal and is a politburo. sent3: the airbrush is tidal. sent4: there exists something such that it does contribute millenary. sent5: the ninepin is not a padauk if the fact that it is a kind of a Oswald and it is a kind of a padauk does not hold. sent6: the airbrush is not a politburo if it bespangles apodeme. sent7: the ninepin is not nonprescription but it is not a kind of a Cherbourg. sent8: there is something such that it does contribute millenary and it is a kind of a aerophilately. sent9: something is not a politburo if it does bespangle apodeme. sent10: there is something such that it is a politburo. sent11: if something is tidal then that it does not bespangle apodeme and it does japan uropathy is incorrect. sent12: the airbrush is a kind of a gain. sent13: the ninepin does contribute millenary. sent14: if that something does not bespangle apodeme and japans uropathy is false then it is not a politburo. sent15: the airbrush contributes millenary and is not anticyclonic. sent16: the fact that the fact that the airbrush bespangles apodeme and does japan uropathy is not correct if the airbrush is not non-tidal is not wrong. sent17: the ninepin does contribute millenary and/or is not philosophical if it is not a kind of a padauk. sent18: the fact that something does bespangle apodeme and does japan uropathy is false if the fact that it is tidal is right. sent19: if something is not a politburo then the ninepin does contribute millenary but it is not a aerophilately. sent20: the fact that that the airbrush bespangles apodeme and it does japan uropathy does not hold is right. sent21: the ninepin japans uropathy but it does not bespangle apodeme if there is something such that it does not contribute millenary. sent22: the executive contributes millenary. sent23: there is something such that it is not a kind of a aerophilately. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the airbrush does not bespangle apodeme and japans uropathy is not right if it is tidal.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the airbrush does not bespangle apodeme but it japans uropathy is wrong.; sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the airbrush does not bespangle apodeme but it japans uropathy is false then the fact that it is not a politburo is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the airbrush is not a kind of a politburo.; int4 -> int5: something is not a politburo.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the ninepin contributes millenary but it is not a kind of a aerophilately.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__