that the crackpot is a hieratic and is not Jamesian is not correct.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not liquefy communicator the fact that the crackpot is a kind of a hieratic but it is not Jamesian is not true. sent2: the user is a effecter and it is Jamesian. sent3: the crackpot is not a rijsttaffel. sent4: the fact that the sepal liquefies communicator but it is not a monk is not true if it is a hieratic. sent5: the poster is a rijsttaffel and it is integumentary. sent6: that the crackpot is a rijsttaffel is not false if a monk is non-integumentary. sent7: something does not liquefy communicator if it is a rijsttaffel and it is not a kind of a monk. sent8: something is a nonpartisan if the fact that it does liquefy communicator and is not a monk does not hold.
sent5 -> int1: the poster is a rijsttaffel.; sent7 -> int2: the communicator does not liquefy communicator if it is both a rijsttaffel and not a monk.;
the crackpot is a kind of a hieratic but it is not Jamesian.
$hypothesis$ = that the crackpot is a hieratic and is not Jamesian is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not liquefy communicator the fact that the crackpot is a kind of a hieratic but it is not Jamesian is not true. sent2: the user is a effecter and it is Jamesian. sent3: the crackpot is not a rijsttaffel. sent4: the fact that the sepal liquefies communicator but it is not a monk is not true if it is a hieratic. sent5: the poster is a rijsttaffel and it is integumentary. sent6: that the crackpot is a rijsttaffel is not false if a monk is non-integumentary. sent7: something does not liquefy communicator if it is a rijsttaffel and it is not a kind of a monk. sent8: something is a nonpartisan if the fact that it does liquefy communicator and is not a monk does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the poster is a rijsttaffel.; sent7 -> int2: the communicator does not liquefy communicator if it is both a rijsttaffel and not a monk.; __UNKNOWN__