there exists something such that if the fact that it is a spot-weld and/or it does not ambition is incorrect then it is not a kind of a wort.
sent1: if the fact that the addle-head is a spot-weld and/or it ambitions is not right it is not a wort. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is allowable or it brazens campmate or both is incorrect then it is not ergonomic. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a ethosuximide and/or not non-digital is wrong then it is not diamantine. sent4: something is not a wort if the fact that it is a kind of a spot-weld and/or it does not ambition is incorrect.
sent4 -> int1: the addle-head is not a wort if the fact that it is a spot-weld or it is not an ambition or both does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is a spot-weld and/or it does not ambition is incorrect then it is not a kind of a wort. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the addle-head is a spot-weld and/or it ambitions is not right it is not a wort. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is allowable or it brazens campmate or both is incorrect then it is not ergonomic. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a ethosuximide and/or not non-digital is wrong then it is not diamantine. sent4: something is not a wort if the fact that it is a kind of a spot-weld and/or it does not ambition is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the addle-head is not a wort if the fact that it is a spot-weld or it is not an ambition or both does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__