the fact that the eye-lotion is non-polemoniaceous and not a festoon is false.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a kaph and is a kind of a provocateur. sent2: if something is a firewood then that it is not polemoniaceous and it does not festoon is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it is a firewood or is substantival or both. sent4: the editor either does not grow or does embrown eye-lotion or both. sent5: the buttermilk is not coarse and it does not festoon. sent6: the haircloth does not festoon if the eye-lotion is not noxious. sent7: the editor grows or does embrown eye-lotion or both. sent8: if that the haircloth is not surficial but noxious is false the becket is not substantival. sent9: the editor does not embrown amarelle. sent10: something does embrown jerky if it is substantival. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not tyrannize acceleration is right. sent12: if the buttermilk is a firewood then the reductase does not embrown jerky but it is a kind of a firewood. sent13: something does grow and is a kind of a firewood. sent14: the buttermilk is a firewood if something is non-surficial thing that is noxious. sent15: the reductase is a kind of a firewood. sent16: the operations is not a rubidium but it grows. sent17: the eye-lotion is not polemoniaceous if the fact that the becket is not substantival is right. sent18: the fact that that the haircloth is both surficial and noxious is incorrect hold. sent19: the eye-lotion does not embrown jerky if the reductase is not a kind of a festoon. sent20: the reductase embrowns amarelle and does embrown jerky. sent21: there exists something such that it is not a firewood and it is a festoon. sent22: if something does embrown eye-lotion then it is substantival. sent23: if there is something such that it does not grow and/or it embrowns eye-lotion the eye-lotion is not a kind of a festoon. sent24: if something does embrown jerky it is a kind of a firewood. sent25: that the reductase is a kind of a firewood is not false if the buttermilk is a kind of a firewood.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the haircloth is not surficial but it is noxious.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not surficial and is noxious.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the buttermilk is a firewood.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the reductase does not embrown jerky but it is a firewood.; int3 -> int4: the reductase does not embrown jerky.; sent20 -> int5: the reductase embrowns jerky.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the fact that the haircloth is not surficial but it is noxious is incorrect hold.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the becket is not substantival.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the eye-lotion is not polemoniaceous.; sent4 -> int10: there exists something such that it does not grow or it embrowns eye-lotion or both.; int10 & sent23 -> int11: the eye-lotion is not a festoon.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the eye-lotion is not polemoniaceous and it does not festoon is incorrect.
sent2 -> int12: if the eye-lotion is a firewood then that it is not polemoniaceous and it is not a festoon is not true.; sent24 -> int13: the eye-lotion is a firewood if it does embrown jerky.; sent10 -> int14: that if the eye-lotion is substantival then the eye-lotion does embrown jerky hold.; sent22 -> int15: the eye-lotion is substantival if the fact that it embrowns eye-lotion is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the eye-lotion is non-polemoniaceous and not a festoon is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a kaph and is a kind of a provocateur. sent2: if something is a firewood then that it is not polemoniaceous and it does not festoon is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it is a firewood or is substantival or both. sent4: the editor either does not grow or does embrown eye-lotion or both. sent5: the buttermilk is not coarse and it does not festoon. sent6: the haircloth does not festoon if the eye-lotion is not noxious. sent7: the editor grows or does embrown eye-lotion or both. sent8: if that the haircloth is not surficial but noxious is false the becket is not substantival. sent9: the editor does not embrown amarelle. sent10: something does embrown jerky if it is substantival. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not tyrannize acceleration is right. sent12: if the buttermilk is a firewood then the reductase does not embrown jerky but it is a kind of a firewood. sent13: something does grow and is a kind of a firewood. sent14: the buttermilk is a firewood if something is non-surficial thing that is noxious. sent15: the reductase is a kind of a firewood. sent16: the operations is not a rubidium but it grows. sent17: the eye-lotion is not polemoniaceous if the fact that the becket is not substantival is right. sent18: the fact that that the haircloth is both surficial and noxious is incorrect hold. sent19: the eye-lotion does not embrown jerky if the reductase is not a kind of a festoon. sent20: the reductase embrowns amarelle and does embrown jerky. sent21: there exists something such that it is not a firewood and it is a festoon. sent22: if something does embrown eye-lotion then it is substantival. sent23: if there is something such that it does not grow and/or it embrowns eye-lotion the eye-lotion is not a kind of a festoon. sent24: if something does embrown jerky it is a kind of a firewood. sent25: that the reductase is a kind of a firewood is not false if the buttermilk is a kind of a firewood. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the haircloth is not surficial but it is noxious.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not surficial and is noxious.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the buttermilk is a firewood.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the reductase does not embrown jerky but it is a firewood.; int3 -> int4: the reductase does not embrown jerky.; sent20 -> int5: the reductase embrowns jerky.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the fact that the haircloth is not surficial but it is noxious is incorrect hold.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the becket is not substantival.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the eye-lotion is not polemoniaceous.; sent4 -> int10: there exists something such that it does not grow or it embrowns eye-lotion or both.; int10 & sent23 -> int11: the eye-lotion is not a festoon.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__