that there is something such that if that it luxuriates bristle is correct that it does not commercialize apostrophe and it is not a chamber does not hold is not right.
sent1: if the viola does luxuriate bristle and it commercializes hike then it is not a picket. sent2: that the viola does not commercialize apostrophe and is not a chamber does not hold if it does not commercialize hike. sent3: the fact that the viola pickets and it is limbless is correct. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it commercializes hike is not incorrect that it does not commercialize apostrophe and is a picket is not correct. sent5: the fact that the viola does commercialize apostrophe but it is not a kind of a chamber does not hold if it does not commercialize hike. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it luxuriates bristle is not false it does not commercialize apostrophe and does not chamber. sent7: there is something such that if it does luxuriate bristle then that it does commercialize apostrophe and it is not a kind of a chamber is incorrect. sent8: if the viola does not commercialize apostrophe the bismuth commercializes hike and it pickets. sent9: something that commercializes hike luxuriates bristle. sent10: that the viola does not commercialize apostrophe and is a kind of a chamber is incorrect if it luxuriates bristle. sent11: the fact that the viola does not commercialize apostrophe and does chamber is not correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the viola does luxuriate bristle.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the viola does commercialize hike is not wrong.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the viola does luxuriate bristle and it does commercialize hike.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the viola does not picket.; sent3 -> int3: the viola pickets.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the viola does not commercialize hike.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the viola does not commercialize apostrophe and it is not a chamber is incorrect.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: if the viola does luxuriate bristle the fact that it does not commercialize apostrophe and does not chamber is not true.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the bismuth luxuriates bristle.
sent9 -> int8: if the bismuth does commercialize hike then it does luxuriate bristle.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it luxuriates bristle is correct that it does not commercialize apostrophe and it is not a chamber does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the viola does luxuriate bristle and it commercializes hike then it is not a picket. sent2: that the viola does not commercialize apostrophe and is not a chamber does not hold if it does not commercialize hike. sent3: the fact that the viola pickets and it is limbless is correct. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it commercializes hike is not incorrect that it does not commercialize apostrophe and is a picket is not correct. sent5: the fact that the viola does commercialize apostrophe but it is not a kind of a chamber does not hold if it does not commercialize hike. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it luxuriates bristle is not false it does not commercialize apostrophe and does not chamber. sent7: there is something such that if it does luxuriate bristle then that it does commercialize apostrophe and it is not a kind of a chamber is incorrect. sent8: if the viola does not commercialize apostrophe the bismuth commercializes hike and it pickets. sent9: something that commercializes hike luxuriates bristle. sent10: that the viola does not commercialize apostrophe and is a kind of a chamber is incorrect if it luxuriates bristle. sent11: the fact that the viola does not commercialize apostrophe and does chamber is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the viola does luxuriate bristle.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the viola does commercialize hike is not wrong.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the viola does luxuriate bristle and it does commercialize hike.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the viola does not picket.; sent3 -> int3: the viola pickets.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the viola does not commercialize hike.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the viola does not commercialize apostrophe and it is not a chamber is incorrect.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: if the viola does luxuriate bristle the fact that it does not commercialize apostrophe and does not chamber is not true.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__