that the withe is a treatise is right.
sent1: if that the grill is a kind of a Lablab hold that the ani is not expiratory but it is a treatise is wrong. sent2: the withe is additive and/or it is not a Lablab if something is expiratory. sent3: if something is Kenyan then it does prepose grill. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not shoot the domicile is a kind of a Kenyan. sent5: the withe is not a reproduction. sent6: the fact that the service is not anabiotic but a shoot is not right. sent7: if something is additive and/or it is not a Lablab it is a treatise. sent8: the stewpan is a scaler and non-Episcopal if the grill is not expiratory. sent9: something is taxable if it is a Melville. sent10: if the withe is an additive it is a treatise. sent11: if that something is both not expiratory and a treatise is not true then it is not a treatise. sent12: that the stewpan is an additive but it is not a kind of a scaler is not correct if something is not a treatise. sent13: the fact that the stewpan is a scaler and is not Episcopal does not hold if there are non-iridaceous things. sent14: the grill is a Lablab if the stewpan is a Lablab. sent15: if the stewpan is iridaceous then the grill is a kind of a Lablab. sent16: something that preposes grill is a Melville. sent17: if something is additive the stewpan is iridaceous and/or is a Lablab. sent18: if that the service is not anabiotic but it shoots does not hold then it does not shoots. sent19: if the fact that either something is not a loupe or it is chimerical or both is incorrect then it is additive. sent20: there is something such that it is not iridaceous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grill is not expiratory.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the stewpan is a scaler that is non-Episcopal.; sent20 & sent13 -> int2: that the stewpan is a scaler but it is not Episcopal does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the grill is expiratory.; int4 -> int5: something is expiratory.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the withe is an additive and/or is not a Lablab.; sent7 -> int7: if the withe is additive and/or it is not a Lablab it is a treatise.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the ani is not a treatise is true.
sent11 -> int8: if the fact that the ani is not expiratory but a treatise is not correct it is not a treatise.; sent19 -> int9: the withe is an additive if that it is not a kind of a loupe or it is chimerical or both is not correct.; sent9 -> int10: if the domicile is a Melville then it is taxable.; sent16 -> int11: the fact that the domicile is a Melville hold if the fact that it preposes grill hold.; sent3 -> int12: if the domicile is a Kenyan it preposes grill.; sent18 & sent6 -> int13: the service does not shoot.; int13 -> int14: something is not a kind of a shoot.; int14 & sent4 -> int15: the domicile is Kenyan.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the domicile preposes grill.; int11 & int16 -> int17: the domicile is a kind of a Melville.; int10 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the domicile is taxable is true.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it is taxable.;
$hypothesis$ = that the withe is a treatise is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the grill is a kind of a Lablab hold that the ani is not expiratory but it is a treatise is wrong. sent2: the withe is additive and/or it is not a Lablab if something is expiratory. sent3: if something is Kenyan then it does prepose grill. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not shoot the domicile is a kind of a Kenyan. sent5: the withe is not a reproduction. sent6: the fact that the service is not anabiotic but a shoot is not right. sent7: if something is additive and/or it is not a Lablab it is a treatise. sent8: the stewpan is a scaler and non-Episcopal if the grill is not expiratory. sent9: something is taxable if it is a Melville. sent10: if the withe is an additive it is a treatise. sent11: if that something is both not expiratory and a treatise is not true then it is not a treatise. sent12: that the stewpan is an additive but it is not a kind of a scaler is not correct if something is not a treatise. sent13: the fact that the stewpan is a scaler and is not Episcopal does not hold if there are non-iridaceous things. sent14: the grill is a Lablab if the stewpan is a Lablab. sent15: if the stewpan is iridaceous then the grill is a kind of a Lablab. sent16: something that preposes grill is a Melville. sent17: if something is additive the stewpan is iridaceous and/or is a Lablab. sent18: if that the service is not anabiotic but it shoots does not hold then it does not shoots. sent19: if the fact that either something is not a loupe or it is chimerical or both is incorrect then it is additive. sent20: there is something such that it is not iridaceous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grill is not expiratory.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the stewpan is a scaler that is non-Episcopal.; sent20 & sent13 -> int2: that the stewpan is a scaler but it is not Episcopal does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the grill is expiratory.; int4 -> int5: something is expiratory.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the withe is an additive and/or is not a Lablab.; sent7 -> int7: if the withe is additive and/or it is not a Lablab it is a treatise.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__