the camouflaging Irrawaddy does not occur.
sent1: the confusion occurs. sent2: the cretaceousness happens. sent3: if the confusion happens and the cretaceousness occurs the camouflaging Irrawaddy does not occur. sent4: the fact that the fibrocalcificness but not the e-mailing happens is correct if the attenuating occurs. sent5: the separating occurs but the cretaceousness does not occur if the e-mail does not occur. sent6: if the cretaceousness does not occur then the confusion and the camouflaging Irrawaddy happens.
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the confusion occurs and the cretaceousness occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the camouflaging Irrawaddy happens.
$hypothesis$ = the camouflaging Irrawaddy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the confusion occurs. sent2: the cretaceousness happens. sent3: if the confusion happens and the cretaceousness occurs the camouflaging Irrawaddy does not occur. sent4: the fact that the fibrocalcificness but not the e-mailing happens is correct if the attenuating occurs. sent5: the separating occurs but the cretaceousness does not occur if the e-mail does not occur. sent6: if the cretaceousness does not occur then the confusion and the camouflaging Irrawaddy happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the confusion occurs and the cretaceousness occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__