that the drogue does not hunger Lorre and it is not botryoid is not correct.
sent1: that that the drogue is a kind of non-homeostatic thing that is not a kind of the chug does not hold if the drogue is electrocardiographic is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that the Ute is botryoid hold. sent3: everything is calico. sent4: that the drogue does not hunger Lorre and it does not hunger Takakkaw is wrong. sent5: the fact that the drogue hungers Gary but it does not wrap buddleia is wrong. sent6: the stanhope is botryoid. sent7: that the drogue is a timekeeper and does not hunger Lorre is incorrect. sent8: that the drogue is a marcel and is not a kind of a phrenologist is incorrect. sent9: if the pilot is non-botryoid that it is electrocardiographic and hungers Lorre is incorrect. sent10: if the tent is not electrocardiographic then the beebread wraps watt and it is a prosthion. sent11: the drogue does not hunger Lorre and it is not botryoid if the beebread does not wrap watt. sent12: everything does wrap watt and is electrocardiographic. sent13: the plum-yew is electrocardiographic and a Eupatorium. sent14: the drogue is a crematory. sent15: the seminarian does construct nomia and it is botryoid.
sent12 -> int1: the drogue does wrap watt and it is electrocardiographic.; int1 -> int2: that the drogue does wrap watt hold.;
the fact that the drogue is not a prosthion and does not construct diabolatry does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the drogue does not hunger Lorre and it is not botryoid is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the drogue is a kind of non-homeostatic thing that is not a kind of the chug does not hold if the drogue is electrocardiographic is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that the Ute is botryoid hold. sent3: everything is calico. sent4: that the drogue does not hunger Lorre and it does not hunger Takakkaw is wrong. sent5: the fact that the drogue hungers Gary but it does not wrap buddleia is wrong. sent6: the stanhope is botryoid. sent7: that the drogue is a timekeeper and does not hunger Lorre is incorrect. sent8: that the drogue is a marcel and is not a kind of a phrenologist is incorrect. sent9: if the pilot is non-botryoid that it is electrocardiographic and hungers Lorre is incorrect. sent10: if the tent is not electrocardiographic then the beebread wraps watt and it is a prosthion. sent11: the drogue does not hunger Lorre and it is not botryoid if the beebread does not wrap watt. sent12: everything does wrap watt and is electrocardiographic. sent13: the plum-yew is electrocardiographic and a Eupatorium. sent14: the drogue is a crematory. sent15: the seminarian does construct nomia and it is botryoid. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the drogue does wrap watt and it is electrocardiographic.; int1 -> int2: that the drogue does wrap watt hold.; __UNKNOWN__