that the jack is fluvial and it is a kind of an aftermath is wrong.
sent1: if the jack does not flame then it tastes one-seventh. sent2: if the instructions is apostrophic then the tensor is fluvial but it is not an aftermath. sent3: there is something such that that it is a kind of a nutlet and it is not electrophoretic is not true. sent4: the jack is not a indomitability. sent5: that something is fluvial is correct if it does taste one-seventh. sent6: the jack is an aftermath. sent7: if the tensor tastes one-seventh then the salvager does tastes one-seventh. sent8: if something is earthen then the fact that it is non-apostrophic and it is oleaceous is false. sent9: something does taste one-seventh if it does not flame. sent10: the fact that something is apostrophic if that it is apostrophic thing that is oleaceous is not true is not wrong. sent11: if something is not a nutlet then it is earthen and it is a barbwire. sent12: if something does not flame or it is not a indomitability or both it tastes one-seventh. sent13: if a fluvial thing is not an aftermath it does taste one-seventh.
sent12 -> int1: that the jack does taste one-seventh is right if it does not flame and/or it is not a indomitability.; sent4 -> int2: the jack does not flame and/or is not a kind of a indomitability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the jack tastes one-seventh.; sent5 -> int4: the jack is fluvial if it tastes one-seventh.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the jack is fluvial hold.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the salvager does taste one-seventh.
sent13 -> int6: if the tensor is not non-fluvial and is not an aftermath then it tastes one-seventh.; sent10 -> int7: if that the instructions is not apostrophic and is oleaceous is wrong it is apostrophic.; sent8 -> int8: the fact that if the instructions is earthen then the fact that the instructions is not apostrophic but it is oleaceous is false is not incorrect.; sent11 -> int9: if the instructions is not a kind of a nutlet it is earthen thing that is a barbwire.;
$hypothesis$ = that the jack is fluvial and it is a kind of an aftermath is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the jack does not flame then it tastes one-seventh. sent2: if the instructions is apostrophic then the tensor is fluvial but it is not an aftermath. sent3: there is something such that that it is a kind of a nutlet and it is not electrophoretic is not true. sent4: the jack is not a indomitability. sent5: that something is fluvial is correct if it does taste one-seventh. sent6: the jack is an aftermath. sent7: if the tensor tastes one-seventh then the salvager does tastes one-seventh. sent8: if something is earthen then the fact that it is non-apostrophic and it is oleaceous is false. sent9: something does taste one-seventh if it does not flame. sent10: the fact that something is apostrophic if that it is apostrophic thing that is oleaceous is not true is not wrong. sent11: if something is not a nutlet then it is earthen and it is a barbwire. sent12: if something does not flame or it is not a indomitability or both it tastes one-seventh. sent13: if a fluvial thing is not an aftermath it does taste one-seventh. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: that the jack does taste one-seventh is right if it does not flame and/or it is not a indomitability.; sent4 -> int2: the jack does not flame and/or is not a kind of a indomitability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the jack tastes one-seventh.; sent5 -> int4: the jack is fluvial if it tastes one-seventh.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the jack is fluvial hold.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__