the fact that the syllabicness happens is not incorrect.
sent1: the quenching sinner occurs and the acneiformness occurs if the aeronauticalness does not occur. sent2: the autogamy does not occur. sent3: that the bankruptcy but not the conquerableness happens does not hold. sent4: the conversion occurs. sent5: that the syllabicness and the conversion occurs leads to that the covering does not occur. sent6: the aeronauticalness does not occur if that the bankruptcy and the unconquerableness happens is not true. sent7: the acneiformness occurs. sent8: the demising hypnotism does not occur. sent9: if the conquerableness happens the fact that the aeronauticalness does not occur is right. sent10: the fact that the recidivism does not occur is correct. sent11: the fact that the stampeding Macaca does not occur hold. sent12: the quenching sinner does not occur if the covering does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the syllabicness occurs.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: both the syllabicness and the conversion happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the covering does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the quenching sinner does not occur.; sent6 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the aeronauticalness does not occur is correct.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the quenching sinner and the acneiformness happens.; int5 -> int6: the quenching sinner occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the syllabicness happens is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the quenching sinner occurs and the acneiformness occurs if the aeronauticalness does not occur. sent2: the autogamy does not occur. sent3: that the bankruptcy but not the conquerableness happens does not hold. sent4: the conversion occurs. sent5: that the syllabicness and the conversion occurs leads to that the covering does not occur. sent6: the aeronauticalness does not occur if that the bankruptcy and the unconquerableness happens is not true. sent7: the acneiformness occurs. sent8: the demising hypnotism does not occur. sent9: if the conquerableness happens the fact that the aeronauticalness does not occur is right. sent10: the fact that the recidivism does not occur is correct. sent11: the fact that the stampeding Macaca does not occur hold. sent12: the quenching sinner does not occur if the covering does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the syllabicness occurs.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: both the syllabicness and the conversion happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the covering does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the quenching sinner does not occur.; sent6 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the aeronauticalness does not occur is correct.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the quenching sinner and the acneiformness happens.; int5 -> int6: the quenching sinner occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__