the potto is not viricidal.
sent1: if that that the wheeler is a kind of an antigen and/or it does not cathect pyx is not correct hold then the publican is not an antigen. sent2: the wheeler is not an antigen. sent3: that the bow is imperceptible or is not a photolithograph or both is false. sent4: the myofibril is not psychosexual. sent5: the publican is a kind of an antigen if the aristocrat is not non-nonnative. sent6: if the publican is not a kind of an antigen that it is both matriarchal and not a burn is not correct. sent7: that the aristocrat is not nonnative and it is not viricidal is not right if it is not an antigen. sent8: that the publican is nonnative and does not cathect pyx is not true if it is not an antigen. sent9: if the aristocrat is not psychosexual the fact that it is not nonnative and not evangelical does not hold. sent10: the publican is an antigen if that the aristocrat is both non-nonnative and not evangelical is not correct. sent11: that the aristocrat is nonnative but it is not evangelical is not true. sent12: the fact that the bow is both not an antigen and not a burn is false if it is non-evangelical. sent13: that the aristocrat is Nicaean or is not white or both does not hold. sent14: the fact that the Austrian is not non-matriarchal hold. sent15: if the potto is viricidal and it does detour then the aristocrat is not psychosexual. sent16: if the Austrian is matriarchal the bow is a burn. sent17: the potto is a kind of a detour. sent18: that either the aristocrat is nonnative or it is not a kind of an antigen or both does not hold. sent19: if the bow does burn the wheeler is not an antigen. sent20: the Austrian is psychosexual. sent21: the bow detours. sent22: if that the bow is a kind of a burn is not wrong that the wheeler is an antigen and/or it does not cathect pyx is incorrect. sent23: the publican does burn. sent24: the aristocrat is not matriarchal. sent25: that the spinach is matriarchal or it does not cathect lath or both is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potto is viricidal.; assump1 & sent17 -> int1: the potto is viricidal thing that detours.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the aristocrat is not psychosexual.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the aristocrat is not nonnative and not evangelical is false.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the publican is a kind of an antigen.; sent16 & sent14 -> int5: the bow is a kind of a burn.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: that the wheeler is an antigen and/or it does not cathect pyx is wrong.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the publican is not an antigen.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the potto is not viricidal. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that the wheeler is a kind of an antigen and/or it does not cathect pyx is not correct hold then the publican is not an antigen. sent2: the wheeler is not an antigen. sent3: that the bow is imperceptible or is not a photolithograph or both is false. sent4: the myofibril is not psychosexual. sent5: the publican is a kind of an antigen if the aristocrat is not non-nonnative. sent6: if the publican is not a kind of an antigen that it is both matriarchal and not a burn is not correct. sent7: that the aristocrat is not nonnative and it is not viricidal is not right if it is not an antigen. sent8: that the publican is nonnative and does not cathect pyx is not true if it is not an antigen. sent9: if the aristocrat is not psychosexual the fact that it is not nonnative and not evangelical does not hold. sent10: the publican is an antigen if that the aristocrat is both non-nonnative and not evangelical is not correct. sent11: that the aristocrat is nonnative but it is not evangelical is not true. sent12: the fact that the bow is both not an antigen and not a burn is false if it is non-evangelical. sent13: that the aristocrat is Nicaean or is not white or both does not hold. sent14: the fact that the Austrian is not non-matriarchal hold. sent15: if the potto is viricidal and it does detour then the aristocrat is not psychosexual. sent16: if the Austrian is matriarchal the bow is a burn. sent17: the potto is a kind of a detour. sent18: that either the aristocrat is nonnative or it is not a kind of an antigen or both does not hold. sent19: if the bow does burn the wheeler is not an antigen. sent20: the Austrian is psychosexual. sent21: the bow detours. sent22: if that the bow is a kind of a burn is not wrong that the wheeler is an antigen and/or it does not cathect pyx is incorrect. sent23: the publican does burn. sent24: the aristocrat is not matriarchal. sent25: that the spinach is matriarchal or it does not cathect lath or both is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potto is viricidal.; assump1 & sent17 -> int1: the potto is viricidal thing that detours.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the aristocrat is not psychosexual.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the aristocrat is not nonnative and not evangelical is false.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the publican is a kind of an antigen.; sent16 & sent14 -> int5: the bow is a kind of a burn.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: that the wheeler is an antigen and/or it does not cathect pyx is wrong.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the publican is not an antigen.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__