that the trapezius is not a shinny and it is not nonvolatile is not right.
sent1: if the roomette is a alizarin then the fact that it is not neurotropic and it is not a doggerel is not correct. sent2: that if the trapezius does degrade that the trapezius is not a shinny but it is nonvolatile is false is not incorrect. sent3: if something degrades then that it is not a kind of a shinny and it is not nonvolatile does not hold. sent4: the trapezius does degrade.
sent3 -> int1: if the trapezius degrades then the fact that it is not a shinny and not nonvolatile does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the trapezius is not a shinny and it is not nonvolatile is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the roomette is a alizarin then the fact that it is not neurotropic and it is not a doggerel is not correct. sent2: that if the trapezius does degrade that the trapezius is not a shinny but it is nonvolatile is false is not incorrect. sent3: if something degrades then that it is not a kind of a shinny and it is not nonvolatile does not hold. sent4: the trapezius does degrade. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the trapezius degrades then the fact that it is not a shinny and not nonvolatile does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__