the fact that the non-intelligentness or the vacating mugwort or both happens is false.
sent1: not the mitoticness but the reciprocation occurs. sent2: the fact that the palpatoriness occurs is true. sent3: the intelligentness happens. sent4: the volunteering does not occur but the civilness happens. sent5: the fellating occurs. sent6: that the escalading does not occur brings about that the teaming occurs. sent7: the magnifying does not occur and/or the pestle occurs. sent8: if the reciprocation does not occur that the chloroticness does not occur or the saltation happens or both is incorrect. sent9: the deviationism happens. sent10: either that the intelligentness does not occur or the vacating mugwort or both causes that the mitoticness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the intelligentness does not occur or the vacating mugwort happens or both.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the mitoticness occurs.; sent1 -> int2: that the mitoticness does not occur is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the non-chloroticness or the saltation or both occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the non-intelligentness or the vacating mugwort or both happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: not the mitoticness but the reciprocation occurs. sent2: the fact that the palpatoriness occurs is true. sent3: the intelligentness happens. sent4: the volunteering does not occur but the civilness happens. sent5: the fellating occurs. sent6: that the escalading does not occur brings about that the teaming occurs. sent7: the magnifying does not occur and/or the pestle occurs. sent8: if the reciprocation does not occur that the chloroticness does not occur or the saltation happens or both is incorrect. sent9: the deviationism happens. sent10: either that the intelligentness does not occur or the vacating mugwort or both causes that the mitoticness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the intelligentness does not occur or the vacating mugwort happens or both.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the mitoticness occurs.; sent1 -> int2: that the mitoticness does not occur is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__