the tottering occurs.
sent1: the tweezing and/or the basic happens if the foaling thermopile does not occur. sent2: that the foaling thermopile does not occur if that the realization does not occur and the secondariness happens is not true is not incorrect. sent3: the bleach does not occur and the predicativeness does not occur if the syntagmaticness does not occur. sent4: if the auto-da-fe but not the sterilizing nopal occurs the naprapathy does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the auto-da-fe occurs but the sterilizing nopal does not occur is right is not true the tottering does not occur. sent6: the reproduction does not occur and the sterilizing nopal does not occur. sent7: if the lockup happens then the syntagmaticness does not occur and the ministerialness does not occur. sent8: that the fingerlessness occurs and the auto-da-fe happens is false if the reshuffle does not occur. sent9: that the streamer does not occur causes that the naprapathy and the tottering happens. sent10: if the bleaching does not occur and the predicativeness does not occur then the thwarting does not occur. sent11: if the naprapathy does not occur the upholding happens. sent12: the naprapathy results in that the football but not the upholding occurs. sent13: if the reproduction does not occur and the sterilizing nopal does not occur that the reshuffle does not occur is not false. sent14: if that the fingerlessness occurs and the auto-da-fe occurs is not correct the fingerlessness does not occur. sent15: the blond does not occur and the subscribing does not occur if the thwarting does not occur. sent16: if the fingerlessness does not occur then the fact that not the realization but the secondariness occurs does not hold. sent17: the upholding does not occur and the streamer occurs if the argy-bargy happens. sent18: that the argy-bargy happens and the hail occurs does not hold if the subscribing does not occur. sent19: the argy-bargy occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the auto-da-fe occurs but the sterilizing nopal does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the naprapathy does not occur.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the upholding occurs.; sent17 & sent19 -> int3: the upholding does not occur and the streamer happens.; int3 -> int4: the upholding does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the auto-da-fe but not the sterilizing nopal occurs is wrong.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the football occurs.
sent13 & sent6 -> int7: the reshuffle does not occur.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: that the fingerlessness and the auto-da-fe happens is not correct.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: that the fingerlessness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the fact that not the realization but the secondariness happens is not right.; sent2 & int10 -> int11: the foaling thermopile does not occur.; sent1 & int11 -> int12: the tweezing and/or the basicness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the tottering occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the tweezing and/or the basic happens if the foaling thermopile does not occur. sent2: that the foaling thermopile does not occur if that the realization does not occur and the secondariness happens is not true is not incorrect. sent3: the bleach does not occur and the predicativeness does not occur if the syntagmaticness does not occur. sent4: if the auto-da-fe but not the sterilizing nopal occurs the naprapathy does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the auto-da-fe occurs but the sterilizing nopal does not occur is right is not true the tottering does not occur. sent6: the reproduction does not occur and the sterilizing nopal does not occur. sent7: if the lockup happens then the syntagmaticness does not occur and the ministerialness does not occur. sent8: that the fingerlessness occurs and the auto-da-fe happens is false if the reshuffle does not occur. sent9: that the streamer does not occur causes that the naprapathy and the tottering happens. sent10: if the bleaching does not occur and the predicativeness does not occur then the thwarting does not occur. sent11: if the naprapathy does not occur the upholding happens. sent12: the naprapathy results in that the football but not the upholding occurs. sent13: if the reproduction does not occur and the sterilizing nopal does not occur that the reshuffle does not occur is not false. sent14: if that the fingerlessness occurs and the auto-da-fe occurs is not correct the fingerlessness does not occur. sent15: the blond does not occur and the subscribing does not occur if the thwarting does not occur. sent16: if the fingerlessness does not occur then the fact that not the realization but the secondariness occurs does not hold. sent17: the upholding does not occur and the streamer occurs if the argy-bargy happens. sent18: that the argy-bargy happens and the hail occurs does not hold if the subscribing does not occur. sent19: the argy-bargy occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the auto-da-fe occurs but the sterilizing nopal does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the naprapathy does not occur.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the upholding occurs.; sent17 & sent19 -> int3: the upholding does not occur and the streamer happens.; int3 -> int4: the upholding does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the auto-da-fe but not the sterilizing nopal occurs is wrong.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__