the sleeper is a pruner but it is not centromeric if the ferule is vestiary.
sent1: the guarantor does not solidify. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a pruner the wad does solidify. sent3: the ferule does not solidify. sent4: the wad is centromeric if the sleeper does solidify. sent5: the sleeper is centromeric. sent6: the ferule is both centromeric and not vestiary if that the sleeper sensualizes Livingston hold. sent7: if the wad solidifies then the guarantor does not sensualize Livingston. sent8: that the guarantor does bawl quiff is false. sent9: the fact that the sleeper is a pruner that is not non-centromeric is not incorrect. sent10: that the fact that the wad solidifies and is not a familiar is correct is incorrect. sent11: the sleeper does solidify and is a kind of a pruner. sent12: if the fact that the quiff is not familiar is not wrong then the ferule is not vestiary. sent13: the quiff is not familiar if the guarantor does not sensualize Livingston. sent14: the sleeper is a kind of centromeric thing that does not sensualize Livingston. sent15: if the sleeper is a pruner then the quiff is centromeric. sent16: the sleeper is familiar if there exists something such that the fact that it is a pruner that does solidify does not hold. sent17: if something is a kind of a pruner that is not centromeric then the fact that the wad does solidify is not wrong. sent18: that something does bawl Macedon but it is not joyful does not hold if it solidifies. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a pruner and it is not vestiary is not right. sent20: the ferule is centromeric. sent21: if the wad is a pruner the quiff is familiar thing that does solidify. sent22: the sleeper is a familiar if there exists something such that the fact that it is vestiary and it is not centromeric does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ferule is vestiary.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the sleeper is a pruner but it is not centromeric is not correct.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a pruner that is not centromeric is not right.;
the fact that the ferule does bawl Macedon but it is not joyful is incorrect.
sent18 -> int2: if the ferule solidifies the fact that it bawls Macedon and it is not joyful does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the sleeper is a pruner but it is not centromeric if the ferule is vestiary. ; $context$ = sent1: the guarantor does not solidify. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a pruner the wad does solidify. sent3: the ferule does not solidify. sent4: the wad is centromeric if the sleeper does solidify. sent5: the sleeper is centromeric. sent6: the ferule is both centromeric and not vestiary if that the sleeper sensualizes Livingston hold. sent7: if the wad solidifies then the guarantor does not sensualize Livingston. sent8: that the guarantor does bawl quiff is false. sent9: the fact that the sleeper is a pruner that is not non-centromeric is not incorrect. sent10: that the fact that the wad solidifies and is not a familiar is correct is incorrect. sent11: the sleeper does solidify and is a kind of a pruner. sent12: if the fact that the quiff is not familiar is not wrong then the ferule is not vestiary. sent13: the quiff is not familiar if the guarantor does not sensualize Livingston. sent14: the sleeper is a kind of centromeric thing that does not sensualize Livingston. sent15: if the sleeper is a pruner then the quiff is centromeric. sent16: the sleeper is familiar if there exists something such that the fact that it is a pruner that does solidify does not hold. sent17: if something is a kind of a pruner that is not centromeric then the fact that the wad does solidify is not wrong. sent18: that something does bawl Macedon but it is not joyful does not hold if it solidifies. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a pruner and it is not vestiary is not right. sent20: the ferule is centromeric. sent21: if the wad is a pruner the quiff is familiar thing that does solidify. sent22: the sleeper is a familiar if there exists something such that the fact that it is vestiary and it is not centromeric does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ferule is vestiary.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the sleeper is a pruner but it is not centromeric is not correct.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a pruner that is not centromeric is not right.; __UNKNOWN__