that if both the housekeeping balaclava and the scrimping happens the strategicsness does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the tweeting is prevented by that the surficialness and the lunarness happens. sent2: the myopathicness does not occur. sent3: the clipping and the housekeeping precipice happens. sent4: that the scrimping happens and the freeze-drying hatful occurs results in the non-strategicsness. sent5: the housekeeping guayule happens. sent6: that the housekeeping dromaeosaur does not occur is brought about by that the radiotelephonicness occurs and the approaching Bush occurs. sent7: if the approaching ENE does not occur the stoic happens and the freeze-drying hatful happens. sent8: that both the housekeeping balaclava and the scrimping happens prevents the non-strategicsness. sent9: that the scrimping and the freeze-drying hatful happens prevents that the strategicsness does not occur. sent10: both the folding and the civilness happens. sent11: the fact that the housekeeping balaclava happens is true. sent12: the strategicsness occurs. sent13: the shaft occurs. sent14: the freeze-drying hatful occurs. sent15: the Indonesianness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the housekeeping balaclava and the scrimping occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the scrimping happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: both the scrimping and the freeze-drying hatful occurs.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the strategicsness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the stoicness and the approaching teaberry occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that if both the housekeeping balaclava and the scrimping happens the strategicsness does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the tweeting is prevented by that the surficialness and the lunarness happens. sent2: the myopathicness does not occur. sent3: the clipping and the housekeeping precipice happens. sent4: that the scrimping happens and the freeze-drying hatful occurs results in the non-strategicsness. sent5: the housekeeping guayule happens. sent6: that the housekeeping dromaeosaur does not occur is brought about by that the radiotelephonicness occurs and the approaching Bush occurs. sent7: if the approaching ENE does not occur the stoic happens and the freeze-drying hatful happens. sent8: that both the housekeeping balaclava and the scrimping happens prevents the non-strategicsness. sent9: that the scrimping and the freeze-drying hatful happens prevents that the strategicsness does not occur. sent10: both the folding and the civilness happens. sent11: the fact that the housekeeping balaclava happens is true. sent12: the strategicsness occurs. sent13: the shaft occurs. sent14: the freeze-drying hatful occurs. sent15: the Indonesianness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the housekeeping balaclava and the scrimping occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the scrimping happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: both the scrimping and the freeze-drying hatful occurs.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the strategicsness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__