the Libyan is pneumonic.
sent1: something regenerates. sent2: the fact that the Libyan is pneumonic is not false if it is a terbium and transfers inkpot. sent3: if either the crumpet is a etymologist or it is not a ketch or both then it is not a ketch. sent4: something is a ketch but it is not an ignorance if it regenerates. sent5: the Libyan is a kind of a terbium that does not transfer inkpot if the crumpet is a terbium. sent6: if the panhandle is a leakiness then it is a kind of a barmaid. sent7: if something that is a terbium does not transfer inkpot it is pneumonic. sent8: something is not a kind of a terbium if it is not a kind of a ketch. sent9: the crumpet is a terbium and is a ketch if there is something such that it regenerates. sent10: the panhandle is a kind of a leakiness. sent11: the Libyan does not transfer inkpot. sent12: the fact that something is not pneumonic is not wrong if the fact that it is a terbium that is regenerating is wrong. sent13: the fact that the Libyan does not transfer inkpot hold if the crumpet is a terbium. sent14: if the crumpet does transfer inkpot it is a etymologist and/or it is not a ketch. sent15: the fact that the panhandle is not a coal or it is not a etymologist or both is incorrect if it is a barmaid. sent16: the crumpet is a ketch.
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the crumpet is a terbium and it is a ketch.; int1 -> int2: the crumpet is a terbium.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the Libyan is a terbium but it does not transfer inkpot hold.; sent7 -> int4: the Libyan is pneumonic if it is a kind of a terbium and does not transfer inkpot.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the storeroom is a kind of a ketch but it is not a kind of an ignorance.
sent4 -> int5: if the storeroom regenerates it is a ketch and it is not an ignorance.; sent6 & sent10 -> int6: the panhandle is a barmaid.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the panhandle either is not a coal or is not a etymologist or both is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a coal or not a etymologist or both is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the Libyan is pneumonic. ; $context$ = sent1: something regenerates. sent2: the fact that the Libyan is pneumonic is not false if it is a terbium and transfers inkpot. sent3: if either the crumpet is a etymologist or it is not a ketch or both then it is not a ketch. sent4: something is a ketch but it is not an ignorance if it regenerates. sent5: the Libyan is a kind of a terbium that does not transfer inkpot if the crumpet is a terbium. sent6: if the panhandle is a leakiness then it is a kind of a barmaid. sent7: if something that is a terbium does not transfer inkpot it is pneumonic. sent8: something is not a kind of a terbium if it is not a kind of a ketch. sent9: the crumpet is a terbium and is a ketch if there is something such that it regenerates. sent10: the panhandle is a kind of a leakiness. sent11: the Libyan does not transfer inkpot. sent12: the fact that something is not pneumonic is not wrong if the fact that it is a terbium that is regenerating is wrong. sent13: the fact that the Libyan does not transfer inkpot hold if the crumpet is a terbium. sent14: if the crumpet does transfer inkpot it is a etymologist and/or it is not a ketch. sent15: the fact that the panhandle is not a coal or it is not a etymologist or both is incorrect if it is a barmaid. sent16: the crumpet is a ketch. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the crumpet is a terbium and it is a ketch.; int1 -> int2: the crumpet is a terbium.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the Libyan is a terbium but it does not transfer inkpot hold.; sent7 -> int4: the Libyan is pneumonic if it is a kind of a terbium and does not transfer inkpot.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__