that the Cotswold is ameboid thing that does not tailgate enjoyableness is not incorrect.
sent1: everything is ameboid. sent2: if something that is not a gnetum is not a kind of a testosterone it is adiabatic. sent3: the onion is not a kind of a millenary if it is a Champaign. sent4: something does not tailgate enjoyableness if the fact that it tailgate enjoyableness and it is a expansiveness is false. sent5: something that is not a expansiveness is not non-ameboid and does not tailgate enjoyableness. sent6: that the buffalofish does not insufflate de-iodinase is not incorrect if it is not long-distance and it is a cartload. sent7: the Cotswold is not a expansiveness if the buffalofish is not a Saharan and insufflates de-iodinase. sent8: if the buffalofish is not a expansiveness then the fact that the onion is not a kind of a expansiveness but it is a kind of a Saharan is false. sent9: if that something is a kind of non-long-distance thing that is a cartload is wrong then it is not a kind of a expansiveness. sent10: that the onion is a kind of a expansiveness and it is Saharan does not hold if the buffalofish is not a expansiveness. sent11: if the fact that something is not a kind of a expansiveness but it is Saharan is not true then it is not adiabatic. sent12: the fact that the buffalofish is adiabatic but it is not long-distance is not true. sent13: if the onion is not adiabatic then that the Cotswold is ameboid and does not tailgate enjoyableness is false. sent14: if the fact that something is non-adiabatic and/or is a kind of a Saharan is incorrect then it does not insufflate de-iodinase. sent15: if that something is not a Bergson and is meaningful is incorrect it does not reheat onion. sent16: the bollard is not a throw. sent17: if the onion is adiabatic it does not insufflate de-iodinase. sent18: the fact that the onion is a expansiveness and is Saharan is false. sent19: the buffalofish is a kind of a cartload. sent20: if the buffalofish is not a expansiveness the fact that the Cotswold tailgates enjoyableness and is not a cartload does not hold. sent21: the buffalofish is a kind of non-Saharan thing that insufflates de-iodinase if it is adiabatic. sent22: the buffalofish does insufflate de-iodinase and is a gnetum. sent23: if something does not insufflate de-iodinase then that it does tailgate enjoyableness and is a expansiveness is not right. sent24: if something is not a expansiveness it does not tailgate enjoyableness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the buffalofish is not long-distance but it is a cartload.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the buffalofish does not insufflate de-iodinase.; sent22 -> int2: the buffalofish insufflates de-iodinase.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the buffalofish is not long-distance but it is a cartload is not right.; sent9 -> int5: the buffalofish is not a expansiveness if the fact that it is not long-distance and it is a kind of a cartload does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the buffalofish is not a kind of a expansiveness.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the onion is not a kind of a expansiveness and is not non-Saharan is incorrect.; sent11 -> int8: if that the onion is both not a expansiveness and a Saharan is not correct it is not adiabatic.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the onion is not adiabatic.; int9 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the onion does not tailgate enjoyableness.
sent14 -> int10: if the fact that the fact that the onion is not adiabatic or it is Saharan or both is incorrect hold that it does not insufflate de-iodinase is not false.; sent1 -> int11: that the buffalofish is ameboid is right.; sent23 -> int12: if the onion does not insufflate de-iodinase then that it tailgates enjoyableness and is a expansiveness is incorrect.; sent4 -> int13: the fact that the onion does not tailgate enjoyableness is not wrong if the fact that it tailgate enjoyableness and is a expansiveness is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Cotswold is ameboid thing that does not tailgate enjoyableness is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is ameboid. sent2: if something that is not a gnetum is not a kind of a testosterone it is adiabatic. sent3: the onion is not a kind of a millenary if it is a Champaign. sent4: something does not tailgate enjoyableness if the fact that it tailgate enjoyableness and it is a expansiveness is false. sent5: something that is not a expansiveness is not non-ameboid and does not tailgate enjoyableness. sent6: that the buffalofish does not insufflate de-iodinase is not incorrect if it is not long-distance and it is a cartload. sent7: the Cotswold is not a expansiveness if the buffalofish is not a Saharan and insufflates de-iodinase. sent8: if the buffalofish is not a expansiveness then the fact that the onion is not a kind of a expansiveness but it is a kind of a Saharan is false. sent9: if that something is a kind of non-long-distance thing that is a cartload is wrong then it is not a kind of a expansiveness. sent10: that the onion is a kind of a expansiveness and it is Saharan does not hold if the buffalofish is not a expansiveness. sent11: if the fact that something is not a kind of a expansiveness but it is Saharan is not true then it is not adiabatic. sent12: the fact that the buffalofish is adiabatic but it is not long-distance is not true. sent13: if the onion is not adiabatic then that the Cotswold is ameboid and does not tailgate enjoyableness is false. sent14: if the fact that something is non-adiabatic and/or is a kind of a Saharan is incorrect then it does not insufflate de-iodinase. sent15: if that something is not a Bergson and is meaningful is incorrect it does not reheat onion. sent16: the bollard is not a throw. sent17: if the onion is adiabatic it does not insufflate de-iodinase. sent18: the fact that the onion is a expansiveness and is Saharan is false. sent19: the buffalofish is a kind of a cartload. sent20: if the buffalofish is not a expansiveness the fact that the Cotswold tailgates enjoyableness and is not a cartload does not hold. sent21: the buffalofish is a kind of non-Saharan thing that insufflates de-iodinase if it is adiabatic. sent22: the buffalofish does insufflate de-iodinase and is a gnetum. sent23: if something does not insufflate de-iodinase then that it does tailgate enjoyableness and is a expansiveness is not right. sent24: if something is not a expansiveness it does not tailgate enjoyableness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the buffalofish is not long-distance but it is a cartload.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the buffalofish does not insufflate de-iodinase.; sent22 -> int2: the buffalofish insufflates de-iodinase.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the buffalofish is not long-distance but it is a cartload is not right.; sent9 -> int5: the buffalofish is not a expansiveness if the fact that it is not long-distance and it is a kind of a cartload does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the buffalofish is not a kind of a expansiveness.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the onion is not a kind of a expansiveness and is not non-Saharan is incorrect.; sent11 -> int8: if that the onion is both not a expansiveness and a Saharan is not correct it is not adiabatic.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the onion is not adiabatic.; int9 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__