if the fact that the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur hold then that the eliminating Cassiope does not occur and the frosting does not occur does not hold.
sent1: if that the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur and the deceleration does not occur does not hold then the ordination does not occur. sent2: the fact that not the eliminating Cassiope but the frost happens is wrong if the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur. sent3: that the eliminating Cassiope occurs but the frosting does not occur is not right. sent4: that the eliminating Cassiope does not occur but the frosting occurs is not true. sent5: the frosting does not occur. sent6: the anticlimacticness happens. sent7: the eliminating Hemiramphidae happens if the eliminating Cassiope occurs but the frost does not occur. sent8: the eliminating Cassiope does not occur. sent9: if that the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur is true that the eliminating Cassiope occurs but the frosting does not occur is wrong. sent10: the eliminating Cassiope does not occur and the frosting does not occur if the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur. sent11: if the eliminating Cassiope does not occur but the frost happens then the eliminating Hemiramphidae happens. sent12: the lodging happens if both the non-amphibiousness and the non-negligentness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the eliminating Cassiope does not occur and the frost does not occur.;
the ordination does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur hold then that the eliminating Cassiope does not occur and the frosting does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur and the deceleration does not occur does not hold then the ordination does not occur. sent2: the fact that not the eliminating Cassiope but the frost happens is wrong if the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur. sent3: that the eliminating Cassiope occurs but the frosting does not occur is not right. sent4: that the eliminating Cassiope does not occur but the frosting occurs is not true. sent5: the frosting does not occur. sent6: the anticlimacticness happens. sent7: the eliminating Hemiramphidae happens if the eliminating Cassiope occurs but the frost does not occur. sent8: the eliminating Cassiope does not occur. sent9: if that the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur is true that the eliminating Cassiope occurs but the frosting does not occur is wrong. sent10: the eliminating Cassiope does not occur and the frosting does not occur if the eliminating Hemiramphidae does not occur. sent11: if the eliminating Cassiope does not occur but the frost happens then the eliminating Hemiramphidae happens. sent12: the lodging happens if both the non-amphibiousness and the non-negligentness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the eliminating Cassiope does not occur and the frost does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__