that the bachelorette does not tend and is credible is not right.
sent1: something is not radiolucent if it is a kind of a marine and it is not a face. sent2: if there are palpable things the fact that the comfort is not marine is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it does not premise single-leaf and does not distill. sent4: the comfort is a kind of non-onomastic thing that is not a walkingstick. sent5: if the fact that the ossuary is not a walkingstick and faces is false it does not tend. sent6: that the ossuary is not a kind of a walkingstick and it is not infectious is wrong. sent7: the ossuary is not palpable. sent8: the comfort is impalpable thing that is not onomastic if the bachelorette is not onomastic. sent9: the bachelorette does clangor aphrodisia. sent10: if the comfort is infectious then that it is not palpable is correct. sent11: the comfort is marine. sent12: if something is a walkingstick then the comfort is radiolucent. sent13: the comfort is not a kind of a face if it is not palpable and it is not onomastic. sent14: the dioxide is a kind of an ordinary but it is not infectious. sent15: something is not onomastic if that it does not tend and is credible is not true. sent16: there exists something such that that it is not a cowhide and not intramural is wrong. sent17: that the comfort is not radiolucent is wrong if there exists something such that that it is not a walkingstick and it is not infectious is not correct. sent18: the ossuary is not a face.
sent15 -> int1: if that the bachelorette does not tend and is credible does not hold it is not onomastic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bachelorette does not tend but it is credible does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bachelorette is not onomastic.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the comfort is both not palpable and not onomastic.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the comfort is not a face.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the comfort is marine but it does not face.; sent1 -> int6: that the comfort is not radiolucent is right if it is marine and it is not a face.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the comfort is not radiolucent.; sent6 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not a walkingstick and it is not infectious does not hold.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the comfort is radiolucent.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the bachelorette does not tend and is credible is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not radiolucent if it is a kind of a marine and it is not a face. sent2: if there are palpable things the fact that the comfort is not marine is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it does not premise single-leaf and does not distill. sent4: the comfort is a kind of non-onomastic thing that is not a walkingstick. sent5: if the fact that the ossuary is not a walkingstick and faces is false it does not tend. sent6: that the ossuary is not a kind of a walkingstick and it is not infectious is wrong. sent7: the ossuary is not palpable. sent8: the comfort is impalpable thing that is not onomastic if the bachelorette is not onomastic. sent9: the bachelorette does clangor aphrodisia. sent10: if the comfort is infectious then that it is not palpable is correct. sent11: the comfort is marine. sent12: if something is a walkingstick then the comfort is radiolucent. sent13: the comfort is not a kind of a face if it is not palpable and it is not onomastic. sent14: the dioxide is a kind of an ordinary but it is not infectious. sent15: something is not onomastic if that it does not tend and is credible is not true. sent16: there exists something such that that it is not a cowhide and not intramural is wrong. sent17: that the comfort is not radiolucent is wrong if there exists something such that that it is not a walkingstick and it is not infectious is not correct. sent18: the ossuary is not a face. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if that the bachelorette does not tend and is credible does not hold it is not onomastic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bachelorette does not tend but it is credible does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bachelorette is not onomastic.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the comfort is both not palpable and not onomastic.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the comfort is not a face.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the comfort is marine but it does not face.; sent1 -> int6: that the comfort is not radiolucent is right if it is marine and it is not a face.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the comfort is not radiolucent.; sent6 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not a walkingstick and it is not infectious does not hold.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the comfort is radiolucent.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__