the camouflage does not tabulate methylene.
sent1: that the mush is both not a etanercept and a Linnaeus is not correct. sent2: the phaeton tabulates copyrighted. sent3: the terbium is a langsyne if the corrosive does invest pipit. sent4: if the phaeton is a kind of a langsyne then that the pipit does invest pipit is not false. sent5: if that something either is a kind of a Linnaeus or is not a kinescope or both is incorrect it invests pipit. sent6: the phaeton is not fluvial. sent7: the mush does tabulate pomp. sent8: something does tabulate methylene if the fact that it is a kind of a Linnaeus hold. sent9: there exists something such that it invests pipit and/or it does invest phaeton. sent10: the terbium is not a kind of a kinescope and is not a Marine. sent11: the fact that the corrosive is a etanercept that invests phaeton is not correct if the mush is not a etanercept. sent12: that the corrosive is a etanercept and invests phaeton is not true. sent13: the phaeton is a langsyne if the fact that the corrosive is not a etanercept and invests phaeton is wrong. sent14: that the corrosive is a Linnaeus and/or is not a kind of a kinescope is not true if it is a Marine. sent15: the terbium is not awkward. sent16: the terbium is fluvial if the fact that something is awkward is not incorrect. sent17: if the terbium is a kinescope and is not a kind of a Marine that it is not fluvial is true. sent18: if something does not invest phaeton it is fluvial. sent19: the pipit invests pipit and/or it is a kind of a langsyne. sent20: the phaeton is a kind of a langsyne if the corrosive is a etanercept. sent21: if the terbium is a langsyne the mush does not invest phaeton. sent22: if something is a kinescope and/or it is a Marine then the mush is awkward. sent23: if the pipit does invest pipit the camouflage is a Linnaeus. sent24: something is non-awkward and it is not a etanercept if it is fluvial. sent25: if the terbium is not a kinescope and it is not a kind of a Marine it is not fluvial. sent26: the terbium is not a kinescope. sent27: if the mush is not a etanercept the fact that the corrosive is not a etanercept and invests phaeton is not true. sent28: if something is awkward and/or is a kind of a etanercept the terbium is fluvial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mush is a etanercept.; assump1 -> int1: either the mush is awkward or it is a etanercept or both.; int1 -> int2: something is awkward or a etanercept or both.; int2 & sent28 -> int3: the fact that the terbium is fluvial hold.; sent25 & sent10 -> int4: the terbium is not fluvial.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mush is not a kind of a etanercept.; int6 & sent27 -> int7: the fact that the corrosive is not a kind of a etanercept but it invests phaeton does not hold.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the phaeton is a kind of a langsyne.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the pipit does invest pipit.; int9 & sent23 -> int10: the camouflage is a Linnaeus.; sent8 -> int11: the camouflage tabulates methylene if it is a kind of a Linnaeus.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the camouflage does not tabulate methylene.
sent24 -> int12: if the mush is fluvial then it is a kind of non-awkward thing that is not a etanercept.; sent18 -> int13: the mush is fluvial if it does not invest phaeton.; sent5 -> int14: the corrosive does invest pipit if the fact that it is a Linnaeus and/or is not a kinescope does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the camouflage does not tabulate methylene. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mush is both not a etanercept and a Linnaeus is not correct. sent2: the phaeton tabulates copyrighted. sent3: the terbium is a langsyne if the corrosive does invest pipit. sent4: if the phaeton is a kind of a langsyne then that the pipit does invest pipit is not false. sent5: if that something either is a kind of a Linnaeus or is not a kinescope or both is incorrect it invests pipit. sent6: the phaeton is not fluvial. sent7: the mush does tabulate pomp. sent8: something does tabulate methylene if the fact that it is a kind of a Linnaeus hold. sent9: there exists something such that it invests pipit and/or it does invest phaeton. sent10: the terbium is not a kind of a kinescope and is not a Marine. sent11: the fact that the corrosive is a etanercept that invests phaeton is not correct if the mush is not a etanercept. sent12: that the corrosive is a etanercept and invests phaeton is not true. sent13: the phaeton is a langsyne if the fact that the corrosive is not a etanercept and invests phaeton is wrong. sent14: that the corrosive is a Linnaeus and/or is not a kind of a kinescope is not true if it is a Marine. sent15: the terbium is not awkward. sent16: the terbium is fluvial if the fact that something is awkward is not incorrect. sent17: if the terbium is a kinescope and is not a kind of a Marine that it is not fluvial is true. sent18: if something does not invest phaeton it is fluvial. sent19: the pipit invests pipit and/or it is a kind of a langsyne. sent20: the phaeton is a kind of a langsyne if the corrosive is a etanercept. sent21: if the terbium is a langsyne the mush does not invest phaeton. sent22: if something is a kinescope and/or it is a Marine then the mush is awkward. sent23: if the pipit does invest pipit the camouflage is a Linnaeus. sent24: something is non-awkward and it is not a etanercept if it is fluvial. sent25: if the terbium is not a kinescope and it is not a kind of a Marine it is not fluvial. sent26: the terbium is not a kinescope. sent27: if the mush is not a etanercept the fact that the corrosive is not a etanercept and invests phaeton is not true. sent28: if something is awkward and/or is a kind of a etanercept the terbium is fluvial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mush is a etanercept.; assump1 -> int1: either the mush is awkward or it is a etanercept or both.; int1 -> int2: something is awkward or a etanercept or both.; int2 & sent28 -> int3: the fact that the terbium is fluvial hold.; sent25 & sent10 -> int4: the terbium is not fluvial.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mush is not a kind of a etanercept.; int6 & sent27 -> int7: the fact that the corrosive is not a kind of a etanercept but it invests phaeton does not hold.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the phaeton is a kind of a langsyne.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the pipit does invest pipit.; int9 & sent23 -> int10: the camouflage is a Linnaeus.; sent8 -> int11: the camouflage tabulates methylene if it is a kind of a Linnaeus.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__