that the filigree does not defoliate quincentennial and does glom Realtor is incorrect.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is topographical and it complects cantle is incorrect the slipknot does not glom Realtor. sent2: the fact that the filigree defoliates quincentennial and it is topographical does not hold. sent3: the fact that the filigree does not defoliate quincentennial but it gloms Realtor does not hold if the slipknot does not gloms Realtor. sent4: that the Justice is topographical and it complects cantle is wrong.
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is topographical thing that complects cantle does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the slipknot does not glom Realtor.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the filigree does not defoliate quincentennial and does glom Realtor is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is topographical and it complects cantle is incorrect the slipknot does not glom Realtor. sent2: the fact that the filigree defoliates quincentennial and it is topographical does not hold. sent3: the fact that the filigree does not defoliate quincentennial but it gloms Realtor does not hold if the slipknot does not gloms Realtor. sent4: that the Justice is topographical and it complects cantle is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is topographical thing that complects cantle does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the slipknot does not glom Realtor.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__