the fact that there is something such that if that it is not a Planera and is not a Perth does not hold it does not rede crippling is not incorrect.
sent1: the poilu is not a belt if it frets lough. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is not a piroplasm and not a Blennius is wrong then it is rhetorical. sent3: there is something such that if that it is a b-meson and is not cretaceous is wrong it is not a bugged. sent4: if that the farmyard does not adhere brinkmanship and it is not a kind of a Perth does not hold then it is a kind of a bugged. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a zoom and it does not adhere expansivity does not hold then it is a kind of a scar. sent6: if the fact that the poilu is not a Planera and it is not a kind of a Perth is not true then it does not rede crippling.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not a Planera and is not a Perth does not hold it does not rede crippling is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the poilu is not a belt if it frets lough. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is not a piroplasm and not a Blennius is wrong then it is rhetorical. sent3: there is something such that if that it is a b-meson and is not cretaceous is wrong it is not a bugged. sent4: if that the farmyard does not adhere brinkmanship and it is not a kind of a Perth does not hold then it is a kind of a bugged. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a zoom and it does not adhere expansivity does not hold then it is a kind of a scar. sent6: if the fact that the poilu is not a Planera and it is not a kind of a Perth is not true then it does not rede crippling. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__