the drunkard does discountenance bobsled.
sent1: the orange does not propose and is not a mind if that the supercomputer is a mind is not incorrect. sent2: the drunkard is a reasoned but not indispensable if there exists something such that it does not propose. sent3: the supercomputer does mind if the phalsa either is not a kind of a use or is not a ghostwriter or both. sent4: if the fact that something does not propose but it does mind is not true it does not discountenance bobsled. sent5: if the drunkard does reason but it is not indispensable then it is a usufruct. sent6: the drunkard discountenances bobsled if it is a usufruct.
the drunkard does not discountenance bobsled.
sent4 -> int1: the drunkard does not discountenance bobsled if the fact that it does not propose and it does mind is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the drunkard does discountenance bobsled. ; $context$ = sent1: the orange does not propose and is not a mind if that the supercomputer is a mind is not incorrect. sent2: the drunkard is a reasoned but not indispensable if there exists something such that it does not propose. sent3: the supercomputer does mind if the phalsa either is not a kind of a use or is not a ghostwriter or both. sent4: if the fact that something does not propose but it does mind is not true it does not discountenance bobsled. sent5: if the drunkard does reason but it is not indispensable then it is a usufruct. sent6: the drunkard discountenances bobsled if it is a usufruct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__