that there exists something such that if it is a psephology and does not shrink sealed then it does not point is not true.
sent1: the ctenidium is not a Wycherley if that it is a kind of overhead a point is correct. sent2: the leporid does feud if it is a kind of a psephology and is not a kind of a strum. sent3: that there exists something such that if it sanctions and is an interest then it is not anecdotal is right. sent4: if something that is a psephology does not shrink sealed then it does not point. sent5: the stolon is dendritic if it is branchiate and is not a psephology. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of antiseptic thing that does tame anagram then it is non-anecdotal. sent7: if the stolon is trophoblastic and is not client-server it does shrink sealed. sent8: there is something such that if it does murmur sea-duty and murmurs Lindbergh then it is not an invertebrate. sent9: there exists something such that if it is high-tech and is a forbearance then that it is not an antiseptic is right.
sent4 -> int1: if the stolon is a psephology and does not shrink sealed then that it does not point is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a psephology and does not shrink sealed then it does not point is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the ctenidium is not a Wycherley if that it is a kind of overhead a point is correct. sent2: the leporid does feud if it is a kind of a psephology and is not a kind of a strum. sent3: that there exists something such that if it sanctions and is an interest then it is not anecdotal is right. sent4: if something that is a psephology does not shrink sealed then it does not point. sent5: the stolon is dendritic if it is branchiate and is not a psephology. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of antiseptic thing that does tame anagram then it is non-anecdotal. sent7: if the stolon is trophoblastic and is not client-server it does shrink sealed. sent8: there is something such that if it does murmur sea-duty and murmurs Lindbergh then it is not an invertebrate. sent9: there exists something such that if it is high-tech and is a forbearance then that it is not an antiseptic is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the stolon is a psephology and does not shrink sealed then that it does not point is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__