there is something such that if it does not style virago and is not a kind of a Jansenist then it is not some.
sent1: the orogeny is a wise if it does not mellow conflicting and it is not an outboard. sent2: if something that is not a kind of an agent is not capillary then it is not tidal. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not style virago and is not a Jansenist it is some. sent4: the orogeny is not some if it does style virago and is not a Jansenist. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not style virago and is a Jansenist then it is not some. sent6: there exists something such that if it styles virago and it is not a Jansenist then it is not some. sent7: if the orogeny is not some and is eccrine then it is not a parade. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is both ionized and not a track is not incorrect then it is not a citronwood. sent9: the segregator is not tidal if it is not a track and not a Mark. sent10: something that does not style virago and is a kind of a Jansenist is not some. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not passionless and is not a kind of a parochialism then that it is not a kind of a autofluorescence is true. sent12: if the fact that something is not a pater and it is not a quitclaim is correct then it is not topological. sent13: there is something such that if it is not toeless and does not mellow Bailey it does not invalid. sent14: if the orogeny is not Ptolemaic and is not a kind of a take then it is holophytic. sent15: if the orogeny is not a Jansenist but it is a kind of a grill it does not distrust. sent16: if something does not style virago and is not a Jansenist then it is some. sent17: the orogeny does not style carbonara if it is non-some and does not synthesize picornavirus.
there is something such that if it is not an agent and is not a capillary it is not tidal.
sent2 -> int1: the vesicant is not tidal if it is both not an agent and not a capillary.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not style virago and is not a kind of a Jansenist then it is not some. ; $context$ = sent1: the orogeny is a wise if it does not mellow conflicting and it is not an outboard. sent2: if something that is not a kind of an agent is not capillary then it is not tidal. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not style virago and is not a Jansenist it is some. sent4: the orogeny is not some if it does style virago and is not a Jansenist. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not style virago and is a Jansenist then it is not some. sent6: there exists something such that if it styles virago and it is not a Jansenist then it is not some. sent7: if the orogeny is not some and is eccrine then it is not a parade. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is both ionized and not a track is not incorrect then it is not a citronwood. sent9: the segregator is not tidal if it is not a track and not a Mark. sent10: something that does not style virago and is a kind of a Jansenist is not some. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not passionless and is not a kind of a parochialism then that it is not a kind of a autofluorescence is true. sent12: if the fact that something is not a pater and it is not a quitclaim is correct then it is not topological. sent13: there is something such that if it is not toeless and does not mellow Bailey it does not invalid. sent14: if the orogeny is not Ptolemaic and is not a kind of a take then it is holophytic. sent15: if the orogeny is not a Jansenist but it is a kind of a grill it does not distrust. sent16: if something does not style virago and is not a Jansenist then it is some. sent17: the orogeny does not style carbonara if it is non-some and does not synthesize picornavirus. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__