that the meloid is a kind of a mood and it is a side-glance is not true.
sent1: there is nothing that is both a scald and not a mood. sent2: the lap is a kind of a scald and it is a mood. sent3: the Pepsi is a mood. sent4: if that that the lap is a scald but not conscious is not true hold then that the meloid is a kind of a mood hold. sent5: the meloid is a side-glance. sent6: the supply is a mood. sent7: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a scald and is not conscious. sent8: if something is a kind of a mood the fact that it does disunify layered and it does not scald is not true.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the lap is a scald but it is not conscious does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the meloid is a kind of a mood.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the deltoid does disunify layered and is not a kind of a scald is not true.
sent8 -> int3: if the deltoid is a mood then that it does disunify layered and it is not a scald is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the meloid is a kind of a mood and it is a side-glance is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing that is both a scald and not a mood. sent2: the lap is a kind of a scald and it is a mood. sent3: the Pepsi is a mood. sent4: if that that the lap is a scald but not conscious is not true hold then that the meloid is a kind of a mood hold. sent5: the meloid is a side-glance. sent6: the supply is a mood. sent7: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a scald and is not conscious. sent8: if something is a kind of a mood the fact that it does disunify layered and it does not scald is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the lap is a scald but it is not conscious does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the meloid is a kind of a mood.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__