the harlequin-snake does bundle and it deafens cognizance.
sent1: the fact that the harlequin-snake is anatropous is correct if it is a cynancum. sent2: the fact that the eusporangium is not a codetalker and it is not a cynancum does not hold. sent3: if there is something such that it is a kind of a postdiluvian then the fact that the harlequin-snake is both not a ranching and a charterhouse is incorrect. sent4: that the morgue is a kind of a therapist is not incorrect if it does capture kopek. sent5: if the harlequin-snake is prodromal then it is anatropous. sent6: something is a postdiluvian. sent7: something captures Giraffidae if that it deafens cognizance is not wrong. sent8: if the Down is not anatropous then the parhelion is not anatropous. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a cynancum the fact that the harlequin-snake does not bundle and is not a ranching is not right. sent10: something deafens cognizance if it is anatropous. sent11: if something is a kind of a charterhouse then it bundles. sent12: if that something is not a ranching and not a charterhouse is not right it bundles. sent13: the emmer is prodromal but it is not postdiluvian if it is a kind of a cynancum. sent14: if there is something such that it is a postdiluvian the fact that the harlequin-snake is not a ranching and is not a charterhouse does not hold.
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the harlequin-snake does bundle is not incorrect if the fact that it does not ranch and it is not a charterhouse is incorrect.; sent6 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the harlequin-snake is not a ranching and it is not a kind of a charterhouse is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the harlequin-snake bundles.; sent10 -> int4: if the harlequin-snake is anatropous it does deafen cognizance.;
the parhelion either does capture Giraffidae or is a mucosa or both.
sent7 -> int5: if the parhelion does deafen cognizance it captures Giraffidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the harlequin-snake does bundle and it deafens cognizance. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the harlequin-snake is anatropous is correct if it is a cynancum. sent2: the fact that the eusporangium is not a codetalker and it is not a cynancum does not hold. sent3: if there is something such that it is a kind of a postdiluvian then the fact that the harlequin-snake is both not a ranching and a charterhouse is incorrect. sent4: that the morgue is a kind of a therapist is not incorrect if it does capture kopek. sent5: if the harlequin-snake is prodromal then it is anatropous. sent6: something is a postdiluvian. sent7: something captures Giraffidae if that it deafens cognizance is not wrong. sent8: if the Down is not anatropous then the parhelion is not anatropous. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a cynancum the fact that the harlequin-snake does not bundle and is not a ranching is not right. sent10: something deafens cognizance if it is anatropous. sent11: if something is a kind of a charterhouse then it bundles. sent12: if that something is not a ranching and not a charterhouse is not right it bundles. sent13: the emmer is prodromal but it is not postdiluvian if it is a kind of a cynancum. sent14: if there is something such that it is a postdiluvian the fact that the harlequin-snake is not a ranching and is not a charterhouse does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the harlequin-snake does bundle is not incorrect if the fact that it does not ranch and it is not a charterhouse is incorrect.; sent6 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the harlequin-snake is not a ranching and it is not a kind of a charterhouse is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the harlequin-snake bundles.; sent10 -> int4: if the harlequin-snake is anatropous it does deafen cognizance.; __UNKNOWN__