the trilobite is not non-photoconductive.
sent1: the trilobite is not breathless and it does not immortalize toothpowder if it is photoconductive. sent2: the trilobite is not breathless. sent3: if something is breathless but it does not immortalize toothpowder it is not a unaffectedness. sent4: the bloomers does not rib decentralization and/or it is not reductionist if the decentralization is a sociology. sent5: the decentralization is a sociology. sent6: if something is not salient and it is not a fingerling that it is not a kind of an aerospace hold. sent7: something that gates cathartid and/or is not a hisser coos sore. sent8: if something is salient then it does not coo virulence. sent9: that the toxin is a kind of non-granulocytic thing that is not a salient is wrong if the trilobite is not a unaffectedness. sent10: the slacks does not coo virulence if the agua is not splintery and does not coo virulence. sent11: if something is non-photoconductive thing that is not a kind of an airlift then it is not splintery. sent12: the toxin coos virulence if the slacks is not an airlift. sent13: the trilobite is a kind of non-splintery thing that is not conscientious. sent14: the toxin is not a kind of a salient if the slacks is not granulocytic but it is a kind of a salient. sent15: if the trilobite is breathless but it does not immortalize toothpowder it is not a unaffectedness. sent16: if the slacks is splintery the toxin coos virulence. sent17: the agua gates cathartid and/or it is not a kind of a hisser. sent18: the fact that the trilobite does not coo virulence and it is not photoconductive is not correct. sent19: the slacks is splintery and/or it is not an airlift. sent20: if something is archegonial or it does coo sore or both it is not splintery. sent21: if something does not immortalize toothpowder and is not granulocytic it is not a kind of an airlift. sent22: something is non-granulocytic a salient if it does not coo virulence. sent23: if the fact that something is not granulocytic and it is not a salient does not hold it does not coo virulence. sent24: if the fact that the joggle does not rib decentralization is not incorrect either the agua does not coo virulence or it is not an airlift or both. sent25: that something is not a unaffectedness is not false if it is not breathless and it does not immortalize toothpowder.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trilobite is photoconductive.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the trilobite is not breathless and it does not immortalize toothpowder.; sent25 -> int2: the trilobite is not a unaffectedness if it is a kind of non-breathless thing that does not immortalize toothpowder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the trilobite is not a unaffectedness is not wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the toxin is not granulocytic and it is not salient is incorrect.; sent23 -> int5: if that that the toxin is not granulocytic and is not salient is not wrong does not hold the fact that it does not coo virulence is true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the toxin does not coo virulence.; sent19 & sent16 & sent12 -> int7: the toxin coos virulence.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the trilobite is photoconductive.
sent22 -> int9: if the slacks does not coo virulence then it is not granulocytic and is a salient.; sent20 -> int10: if either the agua is not non-archegonial or it does coo sore or both it is not splintery.; sent7 -> int11: if the fact that the agua gates cathartid and/or is not a hisser is not incorrect then it coos sore.; int11 & sent17 -> int12: the agua does coo sore.; int12 -> int13: the agua either is archegonial or coos sore or both.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the agua is not splintery.; sent4 & sent5 -> int15: the bloomers does not rib decentralization or it is not reductionist or both.; int15 -> int16: something does not rib decentralization or it is not reductionist or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the trilobite is not non-photoconductive. ; $context$ = sent1: the trilobite is not breathless and it does not immortalize toothpowder if it is photoconductive. sent2: the trilobite is not breathless. sent3: if something is breathless but it does not immortalize toothpowder it is not a unaffectedness. sent4: the bloomers does not rib decentralization and/or it is not reductionist if the decentralization is a sociology. sent5: the decentralization is a sociology. sent6: if something is not salient and it is not a fingerling that it is not a kind of an aerospace hold. sent7: something that gates cathartid and/or is not a hisser coos sore. sent8: if something is salient then it does not coo virulence. sent9: that the toxin is a kind of non-granulocytic thing that is not a salient is wrong if the trilobite is not a unaffectedness. sent10: the slacks does not coo virulence if the agua is not splintery and does not coo virulence. sent11: if something is non-photoconductive thing that is not a kind of an airlift then it is not splintery. sent12: the toxin coos virulence if the slacks is not an airlift. sent13: the trilobite is a kind of non-splintery thing that is not conscientious. sent14: the toxin is not a kind of a salient if the slacks is not granulocytic but it is a kind of a salient. sent15: if the trilobite is breathless but it does not immortalize toothpowder it is not a unaffectedness. sent16: if the slacks is splintery the toxin coos virulence. sent17: the agua gates cathartid and/or it is not a kind of a hisser. sent18: the fact that the trilobite does not coo virulence and it is not photoconductive is not correct. sent19: the slacks is splintery and/or it is not an airlift. sent20: if something is archegonial or it does coo sore or both it is not splintery. sent21: if something does not immortalize toothpowder and is not granulocytic it is not a kind of an airlift. sent22: something is non-granulocytic a salient if it does not coo virulence. sent23: if the fact that something is not granulocytic and it is not a salient does not hold it does not coo virulence. sent24: if the fact that the joggle does not rib decentralization is not incorrect either the agua does not coo virulence or it is not an airlift or both. sent25: that something is not a unaffectedness is not false if it is not breathless and it does not immortalize toothpowder. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trilobite is photoconductive.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the trilobite is not breathless and it does not immortalize toothpowder.; sent25 -> int2: the trilobite is not a unaffectedness if it is a kind of non-breathless thing that does not immortalize toothpowder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the trilobite is not a unaffectedness is not wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the toxin is not granulocytic and it is not salient is incorrect.; sent23 -> int5: if that that the toxin is not granulocytic and is not salient is not wrong does not hold the fact that it does not coo virulence is true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the toxin does not coo virulence.; sent19 & sent16 & sent12 -> int7: the toxin coos virulence.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__