the graverobber is not Homeric.
sent1: there is something such that it retouches cubism. sent2: that the graverobber is not Homeric if that the graverobber is a twenty-one but it does not retouch sashay does not hold is true. sent3: the fact that the graverobber is a twenty-one and it retouches sashay is not right. sent4: if there is something such that it does retouch sashay and it premises ethosuximide the flat is not Homeric. sent5: if something that does retouch sashay is a twenty-one the fact that the flat does not premise ethosuximide is right. sent6: the fact that the graverobber does not premise ethosuximide hold. sent7: that the flat does premise ethosuximide and it retouches sashay is not right. sent8: the flat does not premise ethosuximide if something is both a Paton and a carom. sent9: there is something such that it retouches sashay. sent10: something is a twenty-one. sent11: if the flat does not premise ethosuximide the fact that the graverobber is a twenty-one and does not retouch sashay is not true. sent12: the flat is not Homeric if it does premise ethosuximide. sent13: there exists something such that it is a twenty-one and it is Homeric. sent14: there is something such that that it is a Paton hold. sent15: there exists something such that it premises ethosuximide. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a carom is correct. sent17: something is expansionist.
$hypothesis$ = the graverobber is not Homeric. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it retouches cubism. sent2: that the graverobber is not Homeric if that the graverobber is a twenty-one but it does not retouch sashay does not hold is true. sent3: the fact that the graverobber is a twenty-one and it retouches sashay is not right. sent4: if there is something such that it does retouch sashay and it premises ethosuximide the flat is not Homeric. sent5: if something that does retouch sashay is a twenty-one the fact that the flat does not premise ethosuximide is right. sent6: the fact that the graverobber does not premise ethosuximide hold. sent7: that the flat does premise ethosuximide and it retouches sashay is not right. sent8: the flat does not premise ethosuximide if something is both a Paton and a carom. sent9: there is something such that it retouches sashay. sent10: something is a twenty-one. sent11: if the flat does not premise ethosuximide the fact that the graverobber is a twenty-one and does not retouch sashay is not true. sent12: the flat is not Homeric if it does premise ethosuximide. sent13: there exists something such that it is a twenty-one and it is Homeric. sent14: there is something such that that it is a Paton hold. sent15: there exists something such that it premises ethosuximide. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a carom is correct. sent17: something is expansionist. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__