the polymyxin is a kind of a joint.
sent1: the Illinoisan is not a progressiveness if there exists something such that it is both inertial and a move. sent2: the polymyxin is Adonic. sent3: the Illinoisan is not a move but it is a kind of a progressiveness. sent4: the neurasthenic is a bystander. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a progressiveness and it is a Adonic. sent6: if something is not Luxembourgian it is a kind of organic thing that does rubbish allemande. sent7: the fact that the polymyxin is not inertial is right. sent8: something is inertial and/or it is an organic if it does not rubbish allemande. sent9: the Illinoisan is inertial. sent10: the fact that the Illinoisan does rubbish allemande and it is Luxembourgian is incorrect if there exists something such that it does not rubbish allemande. sent11: if the polymyxin is not inertial it is a Adonic. sent12: the Illinoisan is not an organic if a joint is a kind of a Calvinist. sent13: that that the dietary moves but it is not a progressiveness does not hold is correct if something does not moves. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Calvinist. sent15: if the Illinoisan is not a move but a progressiveness then the fact that it is not Luxembourgian is correct. sent16: if the polymyxin is not inertial then it is both Adonic and Calvinist. sent17: the neurasthenic is not a move if that it is a bystander is not incorrect. sent18: if the polymyxin does not rubbish allemande but it is Luxembourgian that it is not a kind of a joint is correct. sent19: the saury does not rubbish allemande if the fact that the dietary is a move and not a progressiveness is not right.
sent16 & sent7 -> int1: the polymyxin is a Adonic and it is a Calvinist.; int1 -> int2: the polymyxin is Calvinist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polymyxin is a kind of a joint.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the polymyxin is a joint and is a kind of a Calvinist.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a joint and it is a Calvinist is true.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the Illinoisan is not organic.; sent6 -> int6: the Illinoisan is a kind of an organic and it does rubbish allemande if it is not Luxembourgian.; sent15 & sent3 -> int7: the Illinoisan is not Luxembourgian.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Illinoisan is an organic and it rubbishes allemande.; int8 -> int9: the Illinoisan is an organic.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the polymyxin joints.
sent8 -> int11: either the Illinoisan is inertial or it is an organic or both if it does not rubbish allemande.; sent17 & sent4 -> int12: the neurasthenic does not move.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it does not move.; int13 & sent13 -> int14: that the dietary is a move that is not a progressiveness is not right.; sent19 & int14 -> int15: the saury does not rubbish allemande.; int15 -> int16: something does not rubbish allemande.; int16 & sent10 -> int17: that the Illinoisan does rubbish allemande and it is Luxembourgian is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the polymyxin is a kind of a joint. ; $context$ = sent1: the Illinoisan is not a progressiveness if there exists something such that it is both inertial and a move. sent2: the polymyxin is Adonic. sent3: the Illinoisan is not a move but it is a kind of a progressiveness. sent4: the neurasthenic is a bystander. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a progressiveness and it is a Adonic. sent6: if something is not Luxembourgian it is a kind of organic thing that does rubbish allemande. sent7: the fact that the polymyxin is not inertial is right. sent8: something is inertial and/or it is an organic if it does not rubbish allemande. sent9: the Illinoisan is inertial. sent10: the fact that the Illinoisan does rubbish allemande and it is Luxembourgian is incorrect if there exists something such that it does not rubbish allemande. sent11: if the polymyxin is not inertial it is a Adonic. sent12: the Illinoisan is not an organic if a joint is a kind of a Calvinist. sent13: that that the dietary moves but it is not a progressiveness does not hold is correct if something does not moves. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Calvinist. sent15: if the Illinoisan is not a move but a progressiveness then the fact that it is not Luxembourgian is correct. sent16: if the polymyxin is not inertial then it is both Adonic and Calvinist. sent17: the neurasthenic is not a move if that it is a bystander is not incorrect. sent18: if the polymyxin does not rubbish allemande but it is Luxembourgian that it is not a kind of a joint is correct. sent19: the saury does not rubbish allemande if the fact that the dietary is a move and not a progressiveness is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent7 -> int1: the polymyxin is a Adonic and it is a Calvinist.; int1 -> int2: the polymyxin is Calvinist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polymyxin is a kind of a joint.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the polymyxin is a joint and is a kind of a Calvinist.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a joint and it is a Calvinist is true.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the Illinoisan is not organic.; sent6 -> int6: the Illinoisan is a kind of an organic and it does rubbish allemande if it is not Luxembourgian.; sent15 & sent3 -> int7: the Illinoisan is not Luxembourgian.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Illinoisan is an organic and it rubbishes allemande.; int8 -> int9: the Illinoisan is an organic.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__