the fact that the demilitarizing rod occurs is correct.
sent1: the demilitarizing rod does not occur if the euclidianness does not occur and the pandiculation does not occur. sent2: the interleaving Verdi occurs. sent3: the fretting clothesbrush occurs. sent4: that both the interleaving Verdi and the fretting clothesbrush happens prevents that the pandiculation occurs. sent5: if that the aquiculturalness but not the pandiculation happens does not hold then the aquiculturalness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the non-euclidianness and the contradistinguishing hajj occurs is false the bicameralness does not occur. sent7: both the IOP and the bicameralness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the euclidianness but the contradistinguishing hajj occurs is not true.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the bicameralness does not occur.; sent7 -> int2: the bicameralness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: not the euclidianness but the contradistinguishing hajj happens.; int4 -> int5: the euclidianness does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int6: the interleaving Verdi and the fretting clothesbrush happens.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the pandiculation does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the euclidianness does not occur and the pandiculation does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the aquiculturalness does not occur and the courtship occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the demilitarizing rod occurs is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the demilitarizing rod does not occur if the euclidianness does not occur and the pandiculation does not occur. sent2: the interleaving Verdi occurs. sent3: the fretting clothesbrush occurs. sent4: that both the interleaving Verdi and the fretting clothesbrush happens prevents that the pandiculation occurs. sent5: if that the aquiculturalness but not the pandiculation happens does not hold then the aquiculturalness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the non-euclidianness and the contradistinguishing hajj occurs is false the bicameralness does not occur. sent7: both the IOP and the bicameralness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the euclidianness but the contradistinguishing hajj occurs is not true.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the bicameralness does not occur.; sent7 -> int2: the bicameralness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: not the euclidianness but the contradistinguishing hajj happens.; int4 -> int5: the euclidianness does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int6: the interleaving Verdi and the fretting clothesbrush happens.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the pandiculation does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the euclidianness does not occur and the pandiculation does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__