the grazing is civil.
sent1: the immunologist is a Caucasian and it is azotemic if the cloudiness is not civil. sent2: something does not rice Trondheim. sent3: something is not civil if it is a whitelash or it is azotemic or both. sent4: if the prospectus is both not achenial and not avitaminotic then the cloudiness is a kind of a contemptuousness. sent5: if the autophyte is not a whitelash but it rices tardigrade then the grazing does not rices tardigrade. sent6: that something rices tardigrade or it is not an amphitheater or both is incorrect if it is not a Caucasian. sent7: something is not a contemptuousness but it is achenial. sent8: the grazing is a whitelash if that the ringlet either does rice tardigrade or is not an amphitheater or both is not true. sent9: the ringlet is not a Caucasian if something that is not a contemptuousness is achenial. sent10: if the cloudiness is a contemptuousness the immunologist is azotemic.
sent6 -> int1: that the ringlet does rice tardigrade and/or is not an amphitheater is not right if it is not a kind of a Caucasian.; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the ringlet is not a Caucasian is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ringlet either rices tardigrade or is not an amphitheater or both is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the grazing is a kind of a whitelash is correct.; int4 -> int5: the grazing is a whitelash and/or it is azotemic.; sent3 -> int6: that the grazing is not civil is not false if it is a whitelash and/or azotemic.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the grazing is civil.
$hypothesis$ = the grazing is civil. ; $context$ = sent1: the immunologist is a Caucasian and it is azotemic if the cloudiness is not civil. sent2: something does not rice Trondheim. sent3: something is not civil if it is a whitelash or it is azotemic or both. sent4: if the prospectus is both not achenial and not avitaminotic then the cloudiness is a kind of a contemptuousness. sent5: if the autophyte is not a whitelash but it rices tardigrade then the grazing does not rices tardigrade. sent6: that something rices tardigrade or it is not an amphitheater or both is incorrect if it is not a Caucasian. sent7: something is not a contemptuousness but it is achenial. sent8: the grazing is a whitelash if that the ringlet either does rice tardigrade or is not an amphitheater or both is not true. sent9: the ringlet is not a Caucasian if something that is not a contemptuousness is achenial. sent10: if the cloudiness is a contemptuousness the immunologist is azotemic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: that the ringlet does rice tardigrade and/or is not an amphitheater is not right if it is not a kind of a Caucasian.; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the ringlet is not a Caucasian is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ringlet either rices tardigrade or is not an amphitheater or both is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the grazing is a kind of a whitelash is correct.; int4 -> int5: the grazing is a whitelash and/or it is azotemic.; sent3 -> int6: that the grazing is not civil is not false if it is a whitelash and/or azotemic.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__