the Grecian is not unrealistic and Frenches Algren.
sent1: if that the odontoglossum is not unrealistic is correct the fact that the Grecian is unrealistic and Frenches Algren is wrong. sent2: that the Grecian is unrealistic and it does French Algren is not true. sent3: the fact that the Grecian is not hydroelectric is true if either something does not suppose or it does varnish or both. sent4: if the Grecian is not italic then it Frenches Algren and is a union. sent5: the jellaba is not a lady's-eardrop. sent6: there is something such that it does not suppose. sent7: if that something is unrealistic but it is not subarctic is wrong then it is not unrealistic. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that that it does suppose and/or it is hydroelectric is not right is right. sent9: the Grecian does not dehydrogenate jellaba but it is a kind of a fleetness if it is not toxic. sent10: that the fact that the Grecian is not unrealistic but it Frenches Algren is not correct if the fact that the odontoglossum is not unrealistic is not incorrect is correct. sent11: if the odontoglossum is not subarctic then the fact that the jellaba is a kind of non-subarctic thing that is unrealistic is incorrect. sent12: the fact that something is not realistic and not subarctic is not true if it is not hydroelectric. sent13: the jellaba is subarctic if there is something such that that it does suppose and/or it is hydroelectric does not hold. sent14: something does not suppose and/or it is a varnish if it is not a kind of a lady's-eardrop. sent15: the fact that the Grecian is toxic is incorrect. sent16: there is something such that that it is not subarctic is not false. sent17: the jellaba is not subarctic if something is unrealistic. sent18: there is something such that it supposes and/or it is hydroelectric. sent19: the fact that the man-of-war does not French Algren is not incorrect. sent20: there is something such that it is not hydroelectric. sent21: if that the odontoglossum does not French Algren is right that the Grecian does French Algren and is unrealistic does not hold. sent22: if something that is a fleetness is a oldwench it is not italic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the odontoglossum is unrealistic.; assump1 -> int1: there are unrealistic things.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: that the jellaba is not subarctic is not wrong.; sent8 & sent13 -> int3: the jellaba is subarctic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the odontoglossum is not unrealistic.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Grecian is a kind of non-unrealistic thing that Frenches Algren.
sent7 -> int6: the Grecian is not unrealistic if that it is unrealistic and it is not subarctic is false.; sent12 -> int7: that the Grecian is unrealistic but it is not subarctic is not correct if the fact that it is hydroelectric is not correct.; sent14 -> int8: the jellaba does not suppose and/or it is a varnish if it is not a lady's-eardrop.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the jellaba does not suppose and/or does varnish.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it does not suppose or it varnishes or both.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the Grecian is not hydroelectric.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the Grecian is both unrealistic and not subarctic does not hold.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the Grecian is not unrealistic.; sent22 -> int14: if the Grecian is a fleetness and it is a oldwench then it is not a kind of an italic.; sent9 & sent15 -> int15: the Grecian does not dehydrogenate jellaba but it is a fleetness.; int15 -> int16: the Grecian is a fleetness.;
$hypothesis$ = the Grecian is not unrealistic and Frenches Algren. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the odontoglossum is not unrealistic is correct the fact that the Grecian is unrealistic and Frenches Algren is wrong. sent2: that the Grecian is unrealistic and it does French Algren is not true. sent3: the fact that the Grecian is not hydroelectric is true if either something does not suppose or it does varnish or both. sent4: if the Grecian is not italic then it Frenches Algren and is a union. sent5: the jellaba is not a lady's-eardrop. sent6: there is something such that it does not suppose. sent7: if that something is unrealistic but it is not subarctic is wrong then it is not unrealistic. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that that it does suppose and/or it is hydroelectric is not right is right. sent9: the Grecian does not dehydrogenate jellaba but it is a kind of a fleetness if it is not toxic. sent10: that the fact that the Grecian is not unrealistic but it Frenches Algren is not correct if the fact that the odontoglossum is not unrealistic is not incorrect is correct. sent11: if the odontoglossum is not subarctic then the fact that the jellaba is a kind of non-subarctic thing that is unrealistic is incorrect. sent12: the fact that something is not realistic and not subarctic is not true if it is not hydroelectric. sent13: the jellaba is subarctic if there is something such that that it does suppose and/or it is hydroelectric does not hold. sent14: something does not suppose and/or it is a varnish if it is not a kind of a lady's-eardrop. sent15: the fact that the Grecian is toxic is incorrect. sent16: there is something such that that it is not subarctic is not false. sent17: the jellaba is not subarctic if something is unrealistic. sent18: there is something such that it supposes and/or it is hydroelectric. sent19: the fact that the man-of-war does not French Algren is not incorrect. sent20: there is something such that it is not hydroelectric. sent21: if that the odontoglossum does not French Algren is right that the Grecian does French Algren and is unrealistic does not hold. sent22: if something that is a fleetness is a oldwench it is not italic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the odontoglossum is unrealistic.; assump1 -> int1: there are unrealistic things.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: that the jellaba is not subarctic is not wrong.; sent8 & sent13 -> int3: the jellaba is subarctic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the odontoglossum is not unrealistic.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__