the semidesert is a kind of a boom that clangors tenpins.
sent1: there exists something such that either it is a kind of a Stylomecon or it is not ceramic or both. sent2: if the tenpins does operate then the fact that it is a Stanislavsky or it is not revolutionary or both is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that it is cortical and/or is a defecation. sent4: the fact that the semidesert is not agrobiologic is not wrong. sent5: if something premises stoner that it clangors tenpins is correct. sent6: something is agrobiologic if that it is a Stanislavsky or it is not revolutionary or both is wrong. sent7: there is something such that it does premise cacophony and/or it does retouch perspicuity. sent8: the tenpins is a lanyard if the lamb-chop is a lanyard. sent9: the semidesert does premise wrangler. sent10: that something booms and it clangors tenpins is not true if it does not clangor Dacrycarpus. sent11: something does premise cacophony or it does not retouch perspicuity or both. sent12: that the semidesert retouches perspicuity is not wrong. sent13: the semidesert does clangor lamb-chop. sent14: if there is something such that either it is agrobiologic or it does not premise stoner or both then the semidesert booms. sent15: the semidesert is not agrobiologic and does premise stoner. sent16: if there is something such that it premises cacophony that the semidesert does clangor Dacrycarpus is not wrong. sent17: if something is a kind of a lanyard that it does not clangor Dacrycarpus and does not premise stoner does not hold. sent18: the semidesert does not clangor Dacrycarpus if the tenpins clangor Dacrycarpus and is agrobiologic. sent19: the semidesert does clangor Dacrycarpus if the fact that something does premise cacophony or does not retouch perspicuity or both is right. sent20: the lamb-chop is a kind of a lanyard. sent21: something is a kind of a boom if it does clangor Dacrycarpus.
sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the semidesert does clangor Dacrycarpus.; sent21 -> int2: the semidesert is a boom if it does clangor Dacrycarpus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the semidesert is a boom.; sent5 -> int4: the semidesert does clangor tenpins if the fact that it premises stoner is not false.; sent15 -> int5: the semidesert premises stoner.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the semidesert clangors tenpins.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the semidesert is a boom that clangors tenpins is incorrect.
sent10 -> int7: if the semidesert does not clangor Dacrycarpus that it does boom and it does clangor tenpins does not hold.; sent17 -> int8: if the tenpins is a lanyard then that it does not clangor Dacrycarpus and does not premise stoner is not right.; sent8 & sent20 -> int9: the tenpins is a kind of a lanyard.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the tenpins does not clangor Dacrycarpus and it does not premise stoner is not right.; sent6 -> int11: if the fact that the tenpins is a Stanislavsky or it is not revolutionary or both is false then it is agrobiologic.;
$hypothesis$ = the semidesert is a kind of a boom that clangors tenpins. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that either it is a kind of a Stylomecon or it is not ceramic or both. sent2: if the tenpins does operate then the fact that it is a Stanislavsky or it is not revolutionary or both is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that it is cortical and/or is a defecation. sent4: the fact that the semidesert is not agrobiologic is not wrong. sent5: if something premises stoner that it clangors tenpins is correct. sent6: something is agrobiologic if that it is a Stanislavsky or it is not revolutionary or both is wrong. sent7: there is something such that it does premise cacophony and/or it does retouch perspicuity. sent8: the tenpins is a lanyard if the lamb-chop is a lanyard. sent9: the semidesert does premise wrangler. sent10: that something booms and it clangors tenpins is not true if it does not clangor Dacrycarpus. sent11: something does premise cacophony or it does not retouch perspicuity or both. sent12: that the semidesert retouches perspicuity is not wrong. sent13: the semidesert does clangor lamb-chop. sent14: if there is something such that either it is agrobiologic or it does not premise stoner or both then the semidesert booms. sent15: the semidesert is not agrobiologic and does premise stoner. sent16: if there is something such that it premises cacophony that the semidesert does clangor Dacrycarpus is not wrong. sent17: if something is a kind of a lanyard that it does not clangor Dacrycarpus and does not premise stoner does not hold. sent18: the semidesert does not clangor Dacrycarpus if the tenpins clangor Dacrycarpus and is agrobiologic. sent19: the semidesert does clangor Dacrycarpus if the fact that something does premise cacophony or does not retouch perspicuity or both is right. sent20: the lamb-chop is a kind of a lanyard. sent21: something is a kind of a boom if it does clangor Dacrycarpus. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the semidesert does clangor Dacrycarpus.; sent21 -> int2: the semidesert is a boom if it does clangor Dacrycarpus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the semidesert is a boom.; sent5 -> int4: the semidesert does clangor tenpins if the fact that it premises stoner is not false.; sent15 -> int5: the semidesert premises stoner.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the semidesert clangors tenpins.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__