the salmon is not cytophotometric.
sent1: the salmon slags Phalangium and is cytophotometric. sent2: if something is not angiospermous then the fact that the chipotle is cytophotometric is not false. sent3: the gauze is chaetal and it is cytophotometric. sent4: the chipotle is not hairless if that the Activase is hairless and it is a kind of an angstrom is not true. sent5: the fomite is indexical. sent6: there exists nothing that is not afebrile and rummages businesswoman. sent7: the salmon slags Phalangium. sent8: the salmon is a triolein. sent9: something is not angiospermous if it is not angiospermous and/or it does replace. sent10: the salmon is interdisciplinary and it pegs IV. sent11: the fomite rummages laceration. sent12: that something is a kind of hairless thing that is an angstrom is not true if it does not rummage businesswoman. sent13: if there exists something such that it is non-stenographic then the superoxide does slag Phalangium. sent14: the leach is not angiospermous and/or it does replace. sent15: if something is a gumboil and it rummages laceration that it is not stenographic is not incorrect. sent16: the superoxide is cytophotometric if the chipotle is non-hairless thing that is cytophotometric. sent17: the salmon is a kind of a sediment and it slags Phalangium. sent18: the fitting is cytophotometric and it is a gumboil. sent19: if the fomite is indexical it is a kind of a gumboil. sent20: if the fact that something is not afebrile and does rummage businesswoman is not correct it does not rummage businesswoman.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
the salmon is not cytophotometric.
sent9 -> int1: the leach is not angiospermous if it is not angiospermous or it replaces or both.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the leach is not angiospermous.; int2 -> int3: there are non-angiospermous things.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the chipotle is cytophotometric.; sent20 -> int5: if that the blowgun is a kind of non-afebrile thing that rummages businesswoman does not hold it does not rummages businesswoman.; sent6 -> int6: that the blowgun is non-afebrile but it rummages businesswoman is not right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the blowgun does not rummage businesswoman.; int7 -> int8: everything does not rummage businesswoman.; int8 -> int9: the Activase does not rummage businesswoman.; sent12 -> int10: if that the Activase does not rummage businesswoman is correct that it is hairless thing that is an angstrom does not hold.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the Activase is hairless an angstrom is wrong.; int11 & sent4 -> int12: the chipotle is not hairless.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the chipotle is not hairless and is cytophotometric.; int13 & sent16 -> int14: the superoxide is cytophotometric.; sent15 -> int15: the fomite is not stenographic if it is a gumboil and it does rummage laceration.; sent5 & sent19 -> int16: the fomite is a gumboil.; sent11 & int16 -> int17: the fomite is a gumboil and it does rummage laceration.; int15 & int17 -> int18: that the fact that the fomite is stenographic hold is not true.; int18 -> int19: the fact that something is not stenographic is true.; sent13 & int19 -> int20: the superoxide does slag Phalangium.; int14 & int20 -> int21: the superoxide is cytophotometric and it does slag Phalangium.;
$hypothesis$ = the salmon is not cytophotometric. ; $context$ = sent1: the salmon slags Phalangium and is cytophotometric. sent2: if something is not angiospermous then the fact that the chipotle is cytophotometric is not false. sent3: the gauze is chaetal and it is cytophotometric. sent4: the chipotle is not hairless if that the Activase is hairless and it is a kind of an angstrom is not true. sent5: the fomite is indexical. sent6: there exists nothing that is not afebrile and rummages businesswoman. sent7: the salmon slags Phalangium. sent8: the salmon is a triolein. sent9: something is not angiospermous if it is not angiospermous and/or it does replace. sent10: the salmon is interdisciplinary and it pegs IV. sent11: the fomite rummages laceration. sent12: that something is a kind of hairless thing that is an angstrom is not true if it does not rummage businesswoman. sent13: if there exists something such that it is non-stenographic then the superoxide does slag Phalangium. sent14: the leach is not angiospermous and/or it does replace. sent15: if something is a gumboil and it rummages laceration that it is not stenographic is not incorrect. sent16: the superoxide is cytophotometric if the chipotle is non-hairless thing that is cytophotometric. sent17: the salmon is a kind of a sediment and it slags Phalangium. sent18: the fitting is cytophotometric and it is a gumboil. sent19: if the fomite is indexical it is a kind of a gumboil. sent20: if the fact that something is not afebrile and does rummage businesswoman is not correct it does not rummage businesswoman. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__