the immeasurableness happens.
sent1: the Eucharisticness occurs and the unclothing mutation occurs if the unclothing ubiquity does not occur. sent2: the unclothing ubiquity does not occur and the defoliation does not occur if the quadrupling happens. sent3: the summeriness does not occur. sent4: the Eucharisticness prevents that the summeriness does not occur. sent5: the quadrupling occurs and the stowing fridge happens if the impreciseness does not occur. sent6: the immeasurableness occurs if that the fact that the covertness does not occur and the stowing stogy does not occur is not right is not incorrect. sent7: the non-impreciseness and the undependableness occurs if the concretion does not occur. sent8: if the summeriness occurs then that the covertness does not occur and the stowing stogy does not occur is incorrect. sent9: the concretion does not occur if the fact that the restraining does not occur and the grade occurs is false. sent10: the stowing stogy occurs if the immeasurableness occurs. sent11: if the summeriness does not occur then the fact that the fact that the stowing stogy but not the covert happens is not wrong does not hold. sent12: that the covertness does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: if that both the inculpatoriness and the lubrication occurs is false the twirling does not occur. sent14: that the restraining does not occur and the grading occurs is not true if the twirling does not occur. sent15: if the unclothing dorbeetle does not occur then the fact that both the inculpatoriness and the lubrication occurs is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the immeasurableness occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the stowing stogy occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: both the stowing stogy and the non-covertness occurs.; sent11 & sent3 -> int3: that the stowing stogy occurs but the covert does not occur does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the immeasurableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the immeasurableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the Eucharisticness occurs and the unclothing mutation occurs if the unclothing ubiquity does not occur. sent2: the unclothing ubiquity does not occur and the defoliation does not occur if the quadrupling happens. sent3: the summeriness does not occur. sent4: the Eucharisticness prevents that the summeriness does not occur. sent5: the quadrupling occurs and the stowing fridge happens if the impreciseness does not occur. sent6: the immeasurableness occurs if that the fact that the covertness does not occur and the stowing stogy does not occur is not right is not incorrect. sent7: the non-impreciseness and the undependableness occurs if the concretion does not occur. sent8: if the summeriness occurs then that the covertness does not occur and the stowing stogy does not occur is incorrect. sent9: the concretion does not occur if the fact that the restraining does not occur and the grade occurs is false. sent10: the stowing stogy occurs if the immeasurableness occurs. sent11: if the summeriness does not occur then the fact that the fact that the stowing stogy but not the covert happens is not wrong does not hold. sent12: that the covertness does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: if that both the inculpatoriness and the lubrication occurs is false the twirling does not occur. sent14: that the restraining does not occur and the grading occurs is not true if the twirling does not occur. sent15: if the unclothing dorbeetle does not occur then the fact that both the inculpatoriness and the lubrication occurs is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the immeasurableness occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the stowing stogy occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: both the stowing stogy and the non-covertness occurs.; sent11 & sent3 -> int3: that the stowing stogy occurs but the covert does not occur does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__