the wakeboard is not geriatric but it does reflectorize bioterrorism.
sent1: if the filefish is geriatric then the SI does fowl swathe and is not a kind of a toss. sent2: everything is not a miconazole. sent3: the wakeboard is not geriatric and reflectorizes bioterrorism if the filefish is not geriatric. sent4: the wakeboard is not geriatric. sent5: the fact that the SI fowls swathe but it does not toss is not true if there is something such that it is a kind of a toss. sent6: something is a sidestroke if that it is geriatric and does not reflectorize bioterrorism does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the filefish is geriatric.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the SI fowls swathe and is not a toss.;
the fact that that the wakeboard is not geriatric and reflectorizes bioterrorism is not correct is correct.
sent2 -> int2: the filefish is not a miconazole.;
$hypothesis$ = the wakeboard is not geriatric but it does reflectorize bioterrorism. ; $context$ = sent1: if the filefish is geriatric then the SI does fowl swathe and is not a kind of a toss. sent2: everything is not a miconazole. sent3: the wakeboard is not geriatric and reflectorizes bioterrorism if the filefish is not geriatric. sent4: the wakeboard is not geriatric. sent5: the fact that the SI fowls swathe but it does not toss is not true if there is something such that it is a kind of a toss. sent6: something is a sidestroke if that it is geriatric and does not reflectorize bioterrorism does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the filefish is geriatric.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the SI fowls swathe and is not a toss.; __UNKNOWN__