not the mastoidectomy but the remonstrating razorback occurs.
sent1: that the traceableness does not occur triggers that the meteorologicness and the premedicalness happens. sent2: the meteorologicness occurs and the traceableness occurs. sent3: that the measuring smuggler does not occur and the inedibleness does not occur is not right if the combustion happens. sent4: the cholelithotomy does not occur if the measuring diplomat does not occur but the measuring Lentinus happens. sent5: the meteorologicness happens. sent6: the fact that the Serbian does not occur and the remonstrating razorback does not occur is false if the cholelithotomy does not occur. sent7: not the measuring diplomat but the measuring Lentinus happens. sent8: that both the praetorship and the measuring bathe occurs is triggered by that the remonstrating flavorer does not occur. sent9: the Serbianness does not occur if both the mastoidectomy and the traceableness occurs. sent10: the fact that the fact that the inedibleness happens but the remonstrating razorback does not occur is false hold. sent11: if the fact that the inedibleness but not the remonstrating razorback happens is not correct the remonstrating razorback occurs. sent12: that the inedibleness and the remonstrating razorback occurs does not hold. sent13: the praetorship prevents that the combustion does not occur. sent14: the unscrambling happens. sent15: the Serbian happens and the unrentableness occurs. sent16: the bundling occurs. sent17: that the trek and the mastoidectomy happens is brought about by that the unrentableness does not occur.
sent2 -> int1: the traceableness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mastoidectomy occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the mastoidectomy occurs and the traceableness happens.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the Serbian does not occur hold.; sent15 -> int4: the Serbianness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mastoidectomy does not occur.; sent11 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the remonstrating razorback occurs is not false.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the premedicalness occurs and the trekking occurs.
sent4 & sent7 -> int8: the cholelithotomy does not occur.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: that the Serbian does not occur and the remonstrating razorback does not occur does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = not the mastoidectomy but the remonstrating razorback occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the traceableness does not occur triggers that the meteorologicness and the premedicalness happens. sent2: the meteorologicness occurs and the traceableness occurs. sent3: that the measuring smuggler does not occur and the inedibleness does not occur is not right if the combustion happens. sent4: the cholelithotomy does not occur if the measuring diplomat does not occur but the measuring Lentinus happens. sent5: the meteorologicness happens. sent6: the fact that the Serbian does not occur and the remonstrating razorback does not occur is false if the cholelithotomy does not occur. sent7: not the measuring diplomat but the measuring Lentinus happens. sent8: that both the praetorship and the measuring bathe occurs is triggered by that the remonstrating flavorer does not occur. sent9: the Serbianness does not occur if both the mastoidectomy and the traceableness occurs. sent10: the fact that the fact that the inedibleness happens but the remonstrating razorback does not occur is false hold. sent11: if the fact that the inedibleness but not the remonstrating razorback happens is not correct the remonstrating razorback occurs. sent12: that the inedibleness and the remonstrating razorback occurs does not hold. sent13: the praetorship prevents that the combustion does not occur. sent14: the unscrambling happens. sent15: the Serbian happens and the unrentableness occurs. sent16: the bundling occurs. sent17: that the trek and the mastoidectomy happens is brought about by that the unrentableness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the traceableness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mastoidectomy occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the mastoidectomy occurs and the traceableness happens.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the Serbian does not occur hold.; sent15 -> int4: the Serbianness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mastoidectomy does not occur.; sent11 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the remonstrating razorback occurs is not false.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__