the process-server is not a kind of a Oujda.
sent1: if something that is a volatile is not a kind of a crank it is not a carvedilol. sent2: if the process-server is a skepful it is a kind of a crank. sent3: the process-server is a crank. sent4: if the compromiser is a isoflurane then it is a skepful. sent5: the compromiser is a kind of a isoflurane. sent6: if something is not a fiddlestick the fact that it is not a Fahrenheit and is not a skepful is not correct. sent7: the fact that the process-server is a Oujda is false if it is a kind of a carvedilol and it cranks. sent8: the fact that the compromiser is not Fahrenheit is correct if there is something such that that it is both a Fahrenheit and not a fiddlestick does not hold. sent9: the process-server is a carvedilol if that the proconvertin is a kind of non-Fahrenheit a fiddlestick is wrong. sent10: the compromiser is a Oujda. sent11: if the compromiser is a kind of a skepful that the proconvertin is not a Fahrenheit but a fiddlestick is wrong. sent12: the proconvertin is a Oujda. sent13: that the fact that something is a Fahrenheit but not a fiddlestick is not incorrect does not hold if it is not a kind of a carvedilol. sent14: something is a Oujda if it is a isoflurane. sent15: that the process-server is a kind of a isoflurane but it is not a skepful is false if the compromiser is not a Fahrenheit. sent16: if that the proconvertin is not a fiddlestick hold then the process-server is a carvedilol.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the compromiser is a skepful.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the proconvertin is not Fahrenheit but it is a fiddlestick is false.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the process-server is a carvedilol.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the process-server is a kind of a carvedilol and it does crank.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the process-server is a Oujda.
sent14 -> int5: the process-server is a Oujda if it is a isoflurane.; sent6 -> int6: if the fact that the compromiser is a fiddlestick is not true then the fact that it is not a Fahrenheit and it is not a kind of a skepful does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the process-server is not a kind of a Oujda. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is a volatile is not a kind of a crank it is not a carvedilol. sent2: if the process-server is a skepful it is a kind of a crank. sent3: the process-server is a crank. sent4: if the compromiser is a isoflurane then it is a skepful. sent5: the compromiser is a kind of a isoflurane. sent6: if something is not a fiddlestick the fact that it is not a Fahrenheit and is not a skepful is not correct. sent7: the fact that the process-server is a Oujda is false if it is a kind of a carvedilol and it cranks. sent8: the fact that the compromiser is not Fahrenheit is correct if there is something such that that it is both a Fahrenheit and not a fiddlestick does not hold. sent9: the process-server is a carvedilol if that the proconvertin is a kind of non-Fahrenheit a fiddlestick is wrong. sent10: the compromiser is a Oujda. sent11: if the compromiser is a kind of a skepful that the proconvertin is not a Fahrenheit but a fiddlestick is wrong. sent12: the proconvertin is a Oujda. sent13: that the fact that something is a Fahrenheit but not a fiddlestick is not incorrect does not hold if it is not a kind of a carvedilol. sent14: something is a Oujda if it is a isoflurane. sent15: that the process-server is a kind of a isoflurane but it is not a skepful is false if the compromiser is not a Fahrenheit. sent16: if that the proconvertin is not a fiddlestick hold then the process-server is a carvedilol. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the compromiser is a skepful.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the proconvertin is not Fahrenheit but it is a fiddlestick is false.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the process-server is a carvedilol.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the process-server is a kind of a carvedilol and it does crank.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__