the munj is not a kind of a gnathostome and it is not a kind of a Campeche.
sent1: the fact that the neuron is not a kind of a Apogon is correct if the fact that that the intumescence is not a kind of a pigment and it is not adaptable is false hold. sent2: the neuron does resubmit Carnosaura if it resubmits fer-de-lance. sent3: the crampfish resubmits troponym. sent4: if the fer-de-lance is not adaptable the fact that the intumescence is not a pigment and it is not adaptable is not right. sent5: if the crampfish is not a kind of a condiment then the munj is not a kind of a gnathostome and it is not a Campeche. sent6: if the crampfish is not a condiment the munj is not a kind of a gnathostome. sent7: the fixture does resubmit fer-de-lance and/or it is a brand. sent8: if the fixture is a brand then the neuron does resubmit fer-de-lance. sent9: the neuron is a Apogon if it does resubmit Carnosaura. sent10: that the munj is not a condiment but a gnathostome is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that the fact that that it is not a pigment and it is not a Apogon is true is false. sent12: if the fixture resubmits fer-de-lance then the neuron does resubmits fer-de-lance. sent13: there exists something such that it resubmits troponym. sent14: the munj is not a gnathostome. sent15: that the intumescence is a pigment and is not adaptable does not hold. sent16: The troponym resubmits crampfish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crampfish is a kind of a condiment.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the crampfish does resubmit troponym and it is a kind of a condiment.; int1 -> int2: something does resubmit troponym and is a kind of a condiment.; sent7 & sent12 & sent8 -> int3: the neuron resubmits fer-de-lance.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the neuron resubmits Carnosaura.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the neuron is a Apogon.;
that the munj is not a gnathostome and it is not a Campeche is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the munj is not a kind of a gnathostome and it is not a kind of a Campeche. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the neuron is not a kind of a Apogon is correct if the fact that that the intumescence is not a kind of a pigment and it is not adaptable is false hold. sent2: the neuron does resubmit Carnosaura if it resubmits fer-de-lance. sent3: the crampfish resubmits troponym. sent4: if the fer-de-lance is not adaptable the fact that the intumescence is not a pigment and it is not adaptable is not right. sent5: if the crampfish is not a kind of a condiment then the munj is not a kind of a gnathostome and it is not a Campeche. sent6: if the crampfish is not a condiment the munj is not a kind of a gnathostome. sent7: the fixture does resubmit fer-de-lance and/or it is a brand. sent8: if the fixture is a brand then the neuron does resubmit fer-de-lance. sent9: the neuron is a Apogon if it does resubmit Carnosaura. sent10: that the munj is not a condiment but a gnathostome is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that the fact that that it is not a pigment and it is not a Apogon is true is false. sent12: if the fixture resubmits fer-de-lance then the neuron does resubmits fer-de-lance. sent13: there exists something such that it resubmits troponym. sent14: the munj is not a gnathostome. sent15: that the intumescence is a pigment and is not adaptable does not hold. sent16: The troponym resubmits crampfish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crampfish is a kind of a condiment.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the crampfish does resubmit troponym and it is a kind of a condiment.; int1 -> int2: something does resubmit troponym and is a kind of a condiment.; sent7 & sent12 & sent8 -> int3: the neuron resubmits fer-de-lance.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the neuron resubmits Carnosaura.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the neuron is a Apogon.; __UNKNOWN__