the fact that there is something such that if it straws that it is not a fetterbush and blasphemes pastorale is incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the calpac blasphemes pastorale is correct. sent2: something is a straw if it is not a fetterbush and blasphemes pastorale. sent3: if the heteroploid is not surface-to-air it is both worsted and a payable. sent4: if something is not a fetterbush and blasphemes pastorale then it is not a straw. sent5: there is something such that if it is a charlock the fact that it does surprise IMF and it is ritualistic is not right. sent6: something is allowable thing that is not a straw if it is a worsted. sent7: if the calpac is a fetterbush that does blaspheme pastorale the fact that it is not a straw hold. sent8: if the calpac is a fetterbush it is not a kind of a fling and it does blaspheme Lovelace. sent9: the fact that the heteroploid is not surface-to-air hold if the fact that the fact that it is a carboxyl and is surface-to-air is right is not correct. sent10: something does not lag hebetude if the fact that it does boogie and is a balloonfish is right.
sent4 -> int1: if the calpac is not a kind of a fetterbush and does blaspheme pastorale then it is not a straw.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calpac is not a fetterbush and blasphemes pastorale.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the calpac is not a straw.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the calpac is a straw.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the calpac is not a fetterbush but it blasphemes pastorale is correct is incorrect.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the calpac is not a fetterbush but it blasphemes pastorale is false if it is a kind of a straw.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the calpac does not evaporate and does bull.
sent6 -> int6: if the heteroploid does worst it is allowable and it does not straw.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it straws that it is not a fetterbush and blasphemes pastorale is incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the calpac blasphemes pastorale is correct. sent2: something is a straw if it is not a fetterbush and blasphemes pastorale. sent3: if the heteroploid is not surface-to-air it is both worsted and a payable. sent4: if something is not a fetterbush and blasphemes pastorale then it is not a straw. sent5: there is something such that if it is a charlock the fact that it does surprise IMF and it is ritualistic is not right. sent6: something is allowable thing that is not a straw if it is a worsted. sent7: if the calpac is a fetterbush that does blaspheme pastorale the fact that it is not a straw hold. sent8: if the calpac is a fetterbush it is not a kind of a fling and it does blaspheme Lovelace. sent9: the fact that the heteroploid is not surface-to-air hold if the fact that the fact that it is a carboxyl and is surface-to-air is right is not correct. sent10: something does not lag hebetude if the fact that it does boogie and is a balloonfish is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the calpac is not a kind of a fetterbush and does blaspheme pastorale then it is not a straw.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calpac is not a fetterbush and blasphemes pastorale.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the calpac is not a straw.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the calpac is a straw.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the calpac is not a fetterbush but it blasphemes pastorale is correct is incorrect.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the calpac is not a fetterbush but it blasphemes pastorale is false if it is a kind of a straw.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__