the thioguanine is a grill.
sent1: if that something is not unfamiliar is not wrong the fact that it does not testify resistance and it is antistrophic is false. sent2: if that something does not testify resistance but it is antistrophic is false then it is a Trotskyism. sent3: the slattern is not unfamiliar if the Plasticine is not diurnal. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a plumb and not nonadhesive does not hold. sent5: the brow does not grill if that it is both not diadromous and a grill is not correct. sent6: the fact that the slattern is iritic hold. sent7: if the slattern is iritic it is residential. sent8: if the filth does not testify resistance the fact that the Plasticine is antistrophic and it testify resistance is not correct. sent9: the brow is not residential if something is a kind of diurnal thing that is not unfamiliar. sent10: the slattern is not a grill if the fact that it is not unfamiliar is not false. sent11: the fact that the filth is antistrophic and it testifies resistance does not hold if the Plasticine does not testifies resistance. sent12: the thioguanine is a kind of a grill if the brow is not residential. sent13: the thioguanine is not antistrophic if there is something such that it is a grill and it is not diurnal. sent14: the fact that if the filth is not residential then the brow does testify resistance is correct. sent15: if something does not spend REIT the W is a Eurasian. sent16: if the fact that the Plasticine is a kind of a noma that spends REIT is false the filth does not spends REIT. sent17: the fact that the swanflower is not a lurch is not wrong. sent18: if the fact that the Plasticine is antistrophic and it does testify resistance is not correct then it is not diurnal. sent19: that something is residential and it is unfamiliar is not correct if it is not a grill. sent20: the fact that the brow is both not diadromous and a grill does not hold. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a plumb and is not nonadhesive is incorrect then that the filth does spend REIT is not incorrect. sent22: the W is not unfamiliar if there exists something such that that it is residential and it is unfamiliar does not hold. sent23: if the slattern staggers that it is unfamiliar is right. sent24: the slattern is a kind of diurnal thing that is not unfamiliar if the Plasticine is not diurnal. sent25: if the slattern is a kind of unfamiliar thing that is residential then the fact that it is not diurnal is not wrong. sent26: if the filth spends REIT and is a kind of a noma it does not testify resistance. sent27: if that the thioguanine is diurnal and does grill is not right then it is not antistrophic. sent28: there are non-antistrophic things.
sent4 & sent21 -> int1: the filth spends REIT.;
the W is Eurasian and it is a Trotskyism.
sent2 -> int2: if that the W does not testify resistance and is antistrophic does not hold then it is a Trotskyism.; sent1 -> int3: if the W is familiar then that it does not testify resistance and is not non-antistrophic is not correct.; sent19 -> int4: that the brow is residential and it is unfamiliar does not hold if it does not grill.; sent5 & sent20 -> int5: the brow does not grill.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that that the brow is both not nonresidential and not familiar does not hold is not incorrect.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is residential and unfamiliar does not hold.; int7 & sent22 -> int8: the W is not unfamiliar.; int3 & int8 -> int9: that the W does not testify resistance and is antistrophic is not correct.; int2 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the W is a Trotskyism is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the thioguanine is a grill. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not unfamiliar is not wrong the fact that it does not testify resistance and it is antistrophic is false. sent2: if that something does not testify resistance but it is antistrophic is false then it is a Trotskyism. sent3: the slattern is not unfamiliar if the Plasticine is not diurnal. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a plumb and not nonadhesive does not hold. sent5: the brow does not grill if that it is both not diadromous and a grill is not correct. sent6: the fact that the slattern is iritic hold. sent7: if the slattern is iritic it is residential. sent8: if the filth does not testify resistance the fact that the Plasticine is antistrophic and it testify resistance is not correct. sent9: the brow is not residential if something is a kind of diurnal thing that is not unfamiliar. sent10: the slattern is not a grill if the fact that it is not unfamiliar is not false. sent11: the fact that the filth is antistrophic and it testifies resistance does not hold if the Plasticine does not testifies resistance. sent12: the thioguanine is a kind of a grill if the brow is not residential. sent13: the thioguanine is not antistrophic if there is something such that it is a grill and it is not diurnal. sent14: the fact that if the filth is not residential then the brow does testify resistance is correct. sent15: if something does not spend REIT the W is a Eurasian. sent16: if the fact that the Plasticine is a kind of a noma that spends REIT is false the filth does not spends REIT. sent17: the fact that the swanflower is not a lurch is not wrong. sent18: if the fact that the Plasticine is antistrophic and it does testify resistance is not correct then it is not diurnal. sent19: that something is residential and it is unfamiliar is not correct if it is not a grill. sent20: the fact that the brow is both not diadromous and a grill does not hold. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a plumb and is not nonadhesive is incorrect then that the filth does spend REIT is not incorrect. sent22: the W is not unfamiliar if there exists something such that that it is residential and it is unfamiliar does not hold. sent23: if the slattern staggers that it is unfamiliar is right. sent24: the slattern is a kind of diurnal thing that is not unfamiliar if the Plasticine is not diurnal. sent25: if the slattern is a kind of unfamiliar thing that is residential then the fact that it is not diurnal is not wrong. sent26: if the filth spends REIT and is a kind of a noma it does not testify resistance. sent27: if that the thioguanine is diurnal and does grill is not right then it is not antistrophic. sent28: there are non-antistrophic things. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent21 -> int1: the filth spends REIT.; __UNKNOWN__