the viscera does not cathect chancel and it is not a kind of a postbox.
sent1: the clay is a preemie if it is scriptural. sent2: there is something such that that it is a kind of a gig hold. sent3: if there are non-scriptural things then that the viscera does not cathect chancel and is not a postbox is not true. sent4: if there are non-scriptural things the fact that the viscera does not cathect chancel and is a kind of a postbox is false. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a horse-pistol and/or not a gig is wrong. sent6: the fact that the viscera does cathect chancel but it is not a postbox is wrong if something is not scriptural. sent7: the clay is a preemie. sent8: the elsholtzia does philander rendition if the clay is not a occultist but it is a kind of a preemie. sent9: there is something such that it is a horse-pistol. sent10: the elsholtzia does not philander rendition if there exists something such that that it is either not a horse-pistol or not a gig or both is wrong. sent11: the fact that that the viscera does cathect chancel but it is not a postbox hold does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that it is scriptural. sent13: either something is scriptural or it does philander rendition or both if it is not a kind of a gig. sent14: if the clay is scriptural then it is not a kind of a occultist and it is a kind of a preemie. sent15: the fact that the elsholtzia is not a weight but it is a horse-pistol is not correct if it is a kind of a butterfly. sent16: the cosmographer is a kind of a gig. sent17: the viscera does not cathect chancel and is not a postbox if the fact that it is scriptural is not wrong. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a horse-pistol or it is a kind of a gig or both is not true. sent19: either something is not a horse-pistol or it is not a gig or both. sent20: that either the cosmographer is not a kind of a horse-pistol or it is not a gig or both does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clay is scriptural.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the clay is not a occultist but it is a preemie.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the elsholtzia does philander rendition.; sent20 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a horse-pistol or is not a gig or both is false.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the elsholtzia does not philander rendition.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the clay is not scriptural.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is not scriptural hold.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the viscera does not cathect chancel and it is not a postbox.
sent13 -> int8: either the clay is scriptural or it philanders rendition or both if it is not a gig.;
$hypothesis$ = the viscera does not cathect chancel and it is not a kind of a postbox. ; $context$ = sent1: the clay is a preemie if it is scriptural. sent2: there is something such that that it is a kind of a gig hold. sent3: if there are non-scriptural things then that the viscera does not cathect chancel and is not a postbox is not true. sent4: if there are non-scriptural things the fact that the viscera does not cathect chancel and is a kind of a postbox is false. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a horse-pistol and/or not a gig is wrong. sent6: the fact that the viscera does cathect chancel but it is not a postbox is wrong if something is not scriptural. sent7: the clay is a preemie. sent8: the elsholtzia does philander rendition if the clay is not a occultist but it is a kind of a preemie. sent9: there is something such that it is a horse-pistol. sent10: the elsholtzia does not philander rendition if there exists something such that that it is either not a horse-pistol or not a gig or both is wrong. sent11: the fact that that the viscera does cathect chancel but it is not a postbox hold does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that it is scriptural. sent13: either something is scriptural or it does philander rendition or both if it is not a kind of a gig. sent14: if the clay is scriptural then it is not a kind of a occultist and it is a kind of a preemie. sent15: the fact that the elsholtzia is not a weight but it is a horse-pistol is not correct if it is a kind of a butterfly. sent16: the cosmographer is a kind of a gig. sent17: the viscera does not cathect chancel and is not a postbox if the fact that it is scriptural is not wrong. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a horse-pistol or it is a kind of a gig or both is not true. sent19: either something is not a horse-pistol or it is not a gig or both. sent20: that either the cosmographer is not a kind of a horse-pistol or it is not a gig or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clay is scriptural.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the clay is not a occultist but it is a preemie.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the elsholtzia does philander rendition.; sent20 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a horse-pistol or is not a gig or both is false.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the elsholtzia does not philander rendition.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the clay is not scriptural.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is not scriptural hold.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__