the fact that the Sombrero is an anecdote and a Cleridae is false.
sent1: the turquoise is not an anarchy. sent2: if the three is a kind of an anarchy then the perennation is a kind of an anarchy. sent3: that the perennation is an anarchy hold. sent4: if something is a kind of an anarchy it is a Cleridae. sent5: that something is an anarchy is right if it does not brief ableism and it is a OV. sent6: if something is not a OV it does not brief Etruscan. sent7: the perennation is not hypothermic if that it does peruse Ultrasuede and/or it is an anarchy is incorrect. sent8: the Sombrero is not a kind of an anarchy and is a kind of an anecdote. sent9: the perennation briefs Etruscan and wilts if the turquoise is not a beige. sent10: that the three is hypothermic and/or it does not brief ableism is not correct if the perennation does brief ableism. sent11: the perennation is hypothermic. sent12: if that something peruses Ultrasuede and/or it is not an anarchy is not right then it is not hypothermic. sent13: that the perennation is a OV and hypothermic is not true. sent14: if the three is not a kind of a OV that it does not brief Etruscan is true. sent15: the fact that the perennation either peruses Ultrasuede or is not an anarchy or both is not correct if the three is an anarchy. sent16: the three is a OV. sent17: the Sombrero does not peruse Ultrasuede. sent18: if the three does not brief Etruscan the turquoise is not a kind of an anecdote. sent19: if the turquoise is not an anecdote the fact that the Sombrero is an anecdote and it is a Cleridae is wrong. sent20: if that something does not brief ableism but it is an anecdote does not hold then it is not a kind of an anarchy. sent21: the fact that the three is hypothermic and it does brief Etruscan is wrong. sent22: something is not hypothermic if the fact that it does peruse Ultrasuede and/or is a kind of an anarchy is false. sent23: if the perennation does brief Etruscan then the Sombrero is a kind of an anarchy.
sent5 -> int1: the three is an anarchy if it does not brief ableism and it is a OV.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the three does not brief ableism and is a OV.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the three is a kind of an anarchy hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: that either the perennation peruses Ultrasuede or it is not a kind of an anarchy or both does not hold.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the perennation does peruse Ultrasuede or is not an anarchy or both is not right then it is not hypothermic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the perennation is not hypothermic.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the three does not brief ableism and is a kind of a OV is not true.;
that the Sombrero is both an anecdote and a Cleridae is not false.
sent4 -> int8: the Sombrero is a Cleridae if it is an anarchy.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Sombrero is an anecdote and a Cleridae is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the turquoise is not an anarchy. sent2: if the three is a kind of an anarchy then the perennation is a kind of an anarchy. sent3: that the perennation is an anarchy hold. sent4: if something is a kind of an anarchy it is a Cleridae. sent5: that something is an anarchy is right if it does not brief ableism and it is a OV. sent6: if something is not a OV it does not brief Etruscan. sent7: the perennation is not hypothermic if that it does peruse Ultrasuede and/or it is an anarchy is incorrect. sent8: the Sombrero is not a kind of an anarchy and is a kind of an anecdote. sent9: the perennation briefs Etruscan and wilts if the turquoise is not a beige. sent10: that the three is hypothermic and/or it does not brief ableism is not correct if the perennation does brief ableism. sent11: the perennation is hypothermic. sent12: if that something peruses Ultrasuede and/or it is not an anarchy is not right then it is not hypothermic. sent13: that the perennation is a OV and hypothermic is not true. sent14: if the three is not a kind of a OV that it does not brief Etruscan is true. sent15: the fact that the perennation either peruses Ultrasuede or is not an anarchy or both is not correct if the three is an anarchy. sent16: the three is a OV. sent17: the Sombrero does not peruse Ultrasuede. sent18: if the three does not brief Etruscan the turquoise is not a kind of an anecdote. sent19: if the turquoise is not an anecdote the fact that the Sombrero is an anecdote and it is a Cleridae is wrong. sent20: if that something does not brief ableism but it is an anecdote does not hold then it is not a kind of an anarchy. sent21: the fact that the three is hypothermic and it does brief Etruscan is wrong. sent22: something is not hypothermic if the fact that it does peruse Ultrasuede and/or is a kind of an anarchy is false. sent23: if the perennation does brief Etruscan then the Sombrero is a kind of an anarchy. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the three is an anarchy if it does not brief ableism and it is a OV.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the three does not brief ableism and is a OV.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the three is a kind of an anarchy hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: that either the perennation peruses Ultrasuede or it is not a kind of an anarchy or both does not hold.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the perennation does peruse Ultrasuede or is not an anarchy or both is not right then it is not hypothermic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the perennation is not hypothermic.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the three does not brief ableism and is a kind of a OV is not true.; __UNKNOWN__