if the sailboat is periodic that either the landmass does solemnize sailboat or it does not tease landmass or both is false.
sent1: that the landmass is a kind of a figurine but it is not a kind of a byway does not hold. sent2: the landmass is not acapnic if the fact that it is a figurine is true. sent3: that that the landmass either solemnizes sailboat or teases landmass or both is true is not right. sent4: the fact that the sailboat is not periodic is true if the digitigrade is not a scent and does not haze threat. sent5: if the digitigrade is a byway that the landmass is not a figurine and it is not a byway is not correct. sent6: the digitigrade is not a kind of a scent. sent7: the landmass is not acapnic if the fact that it is both not a figurine and not a byway is incorrect. sent8: the landmass does solemnize sailboat or it does not tease landmass or both. sent9: the landmass solemnizes sailboat and/or it does not tease landmass if the sailboat is periodic. sent10: the digitigrade is not a kind of a scent if it is not a byway. sent11: the digitigrade is not a scent and it does not haze threat if it is not a byway. sent12: if the sailboat is not a figurine then it is not periodic and it does not scent. sent13: if the sailboat is periodic the fact that the landmass does solemnize sailboat or teases landmass or both does not hold. sent14: the sailboat is not periodic if the digitigrade scents but it does not haze threat. sent15: if something is not acapnic it does not solemnize sailboat. sent16: if something is not acapnic then the fact that it solemnizes sailboat and/or it does not tease landmass is not right. sent17: if the landmass is not acapnic then it either solemnizes sailboat or does not tease landmass or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the digitigrade is not a byway.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the digitigrade is not a scent and does not haze threat.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the sailboat is not periodic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sailboat is periodic.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the digitigrade is a byway.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the landmass is not a figurine and is not a byway is not right.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the landmass is not acapnic.; sent16 -> int7: the fact that the landmass either solemnizes sailboat or does not tease landmass or both is incorrect if it is not acapnic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the landmass either solemnizes sailboat or does not tease landmass or both is false.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the sailboat is periodic that either the landmass does solemnize sailboat or it does not tease landmass or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the landmass is a kind of a figurine but it is not a kind of a byway does not hold. sent2: the landmass is not acapnic if the fact that it is a figurine is true. sent3: that that the landmass either solemnizes sailboat or teases landmass or both is true is not right. sent4: the fact that the sailboat is not periodic is true if the digitigrade is not a scent and does not haze threat. sent5: if the digitigrade is a byway that the landmass is not a figurine and it is not a byway is not correct. sent6: the digitigrade is not a kind of a scent. sent7: the landmass is not acapnic if the fact that it is both not a figurine and not a byway is incorrect. sent8: the landmass does solemnize sailboat or it does not tease landmass or both. sent9: the landmass solemnizes sailboat and/or it does not tease landmass if the sailboat is periodic. sent10: the digitigrade is not a kind of a scent if it is not a byway. sent11: the digitigrade is not a scent and it does not haze threat if it is not a byway. sent12: if the sailboat is not a figurine then it is not periodic and it does not scent. sent13: if the sailboat is periodic the fact that the landmass does solemnize sailboat or teases landmass or both does not hold. sent14: the sailboat is not periodic if the digitigrade scents but it does not haze threat. sent15: if something is not acapnic it does not solemnize sailboat. sent16: if something is not acapnic then the fact that it solemnizes sailboat and/or it does not tease landmass is not right. sent17: if the landmass is not acapnic then it either solemnizes sailboat or does not tease landmass or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the digitigrade is not a byway.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the digitigrade is not a scent and does not haze threat.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the sailboat is not periodic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sailboat is periodic.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the digitigrade is a byway.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the landmass is not a figurine and is not a byway is not right.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the landmass is not acapnic.; sent16 -> int7: the fact that the landmass either solemnizes sailboat or does not tease landmass or both is incorrect if it is not acapnic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the landmass either solemnizes sailboat or does not tease landmass or both is false.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__