that the weakening happens results in that the puncture does not occur and the steeling sponsorship happens.
sent1: the Kabbalism happens. sent2: either the conceptualization happens or the streaking happens or both. sent3: if that not the steeling Senegal but the Sumerianness occurs is incorrect the fact that the Sumerianness does not occur is not wrong. sent4: if the clinking happens and/or the achondriticness happens the culinariness occurs. sent5: if that the non-unneuroticness and the lowercase happens does not hold then the lowercase does not occur. sent6: if the non-metricness occurs the fact that the Polynesianness occurs hold. sent7: the periodonticsness does not occur. sent8: that the puncture happens and/or the hydraulicness prevents the weakening. sent9: if the fact that the cytokineticness does not occur and the marliness happens does not hold then the fact that the marliness does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: that the forelegness occurs brings about that the dissimilating does not occur. sent11: that the bareboating but not the fearing mercury happens prevents that the carrot does not occur. sent12: if the Polynesian and the non-marliness happens then the steeling sponsorship occurs. sent13: the fearing antihero does not occur. sent14: the fact that not the cytokineticness but the marliness happens is false. sent15: the hydraulicness is prevented by that not the weakening but the steeling sponsorship happens. sent16: either the showering or the conventionalizing insightfulness or both occurs. sent17: the non-metricness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the puncture occurs.; assump2 -> int1: either the puncture happens or the hydraulicness occurs or both.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the weakening does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weakening happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the puncture does not occur.; sent6 & sent17 -> int5: the Polynesian occurs.; sent9 & sent14 -> int6: the marliness does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Polynesianness and the non-marliness happens.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the steeling sponsorship occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the puncture does not occur and the steeling sponsorship happens.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the headquartering occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the weakening happens results in that the puncture does not occur and the steeling sponsorship happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the Kabbalism happens. sent2: either the conceptualization happens or the streaking happens or both. sent3: if that not the steeling Senegal but the Sumerianness occurs is incorrect the fact that the Sumerianness does not occur is not wrong. sent4: if the clinking happens and/or the achondriticness happens the culinariness occurs. sent5: if that the non-unneuroticness and the lowercase happens does not hold then the lowercase does not occur. sent6: if the non-metricness occurs the fact that the Polynesianness occurs hold. sent7: the periodonticsness does not occur. sent8: that the puncture happens and/or the hydraulicness prevents the weakening. sent9: if the fact that the cytokineticness does not occur and the marliness happens does not hold then the fact that the marliness does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: that the forelegness occurs brings about that the dissimilating does not occur. sent11: that the bareboating but not the fearing mercury happens prevents that the carrot does not occur. sent12: if the Polynesian and the non-marliness happens then the steeling sponsorship occurs. sent13: the fearing antihero does not occur. sent14: the fact that not the cytokineticness but the marliness happens is false. sent15: the hydraulicness is prevented by that not the weakening but the steeling sponsorship happens. sent16: either the showering or the conventionalizing insightfulness or both occurs. sent17: the non-metricness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the puncture occurs.; assump2 -> int1: either the puncture happens or the hydraulicness occurs or both.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the weakening does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weakening happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the puncture does not occur.; sent6 & sent17 -> int5: the Polynesian occurs.; sent9 & sent14 -> int6: the marliness does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Polynesianness and the non-marliness happens.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the steeling sponsorship occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the puncture does not occur and the steeling sponsorship happens.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__