the coir is a bungler.
sent1: the signorina is a rebozo. sent2: if the coir is not astronomic and it is not maladroit the Chilean is not a bungler. sent3: that the coir is not maladroit and it is not a bungler does not hold if it does not snuff hemp. sent4: the quackgrass is not maladroit or it does not snuff hemp or both. sent5: either the Chilean is a carboxyl or it does not snuff shtik or both if it is not maladroit. sent6: the Chilean is not non-maladroit and/or it is not a kind of a bungler. sent7: if that the tunic is not a kind of a carboxyl hold it is both not econometric and not a fiberboard. sent8: if the tunic is not a carboxyl it is not econometric. sent9: that the coir is a kind of a bungler is not wrong if the Chilean is not maladroit. sent10: the plutocrat is not non-carboxyl if the tunic is a kind of a non-carboxyl. sent11: the Chilean is not a carboxyl if the tunic does snuff shtik but it is not maladroit. sent12: if that the tunic does snuff shtik is not false then the Chilean is a carboxyl. sent13: the coir does not snuff hemp if that either the quackgrass snuff hemp or it does not din coir or both is not correct. sent14: the coot is a kind of a bungler. sent15: that the Chilean does not snuff shtik is right if the tunic is econometric but not a fiberboard. sent16: the tunic is not econometric. sent17: the tunic is not carboxyl. sent18: if the Chilean is astronomic the coir is a bungler. sent19: if the tunic is not econometric and it is not a fiberboard the Chilean does not snuff shtik. sent20: if the Chilean does not snuff shtik then it is astronomic and/or not maladroit. sent21: if that the tunic does not snuff shtik but it is a bungler does not hold the coir is not a bungler. sent22: the Chilean is astronomic and/or it is not econometric.
sent7 & sent17 -> int1: the tunic is not econometric and it is not a fiberboard.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the Chilean does not snuff shtik.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the Chilean is astronomic or it is non-maladroit or both.; int3 & sent18 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the plutocrat is carboxyl is not incorrect.
sent1 -> int4: there is something such that it is a rebozo.;
$hypothesis$ = the coir is a bungler. ; $context$ = sent1: the signorina is a rebozo. sent2: if the coir is not astronomic and it is not maladroit the Chilean is not a bungler. sent3: that the coir is not maladroit and it is not a bungler does not hold if it does not snuff hemp. sent4: the quackgrass is not maladroit or it does not snuff hemp or both. sent5: either the Chilean is a carboxyl or it does not snuff shtik or both if it is not maladroit. sent6: the Chilean is not non-maladroit and/or it is not a kind of a bungler. sent7: if that the tunic is not a kind of a carboxyl hold it is both not econometric and not a fiberboard. sent8: if the tunic is not a carboxyl it is not econometric. sent9: that the coir is a kind of a bungler is not wrong if the Chilean is not maladroit. sent10: the plutocrat is not non-carboxyl if the tunic is a kind of a non-carboxyl. sent11: the Chilean is not a carboxyl if the tunic does snuff shtik but it is not maladroit. sent12: if that the tunic does snuff shtik is not false then the Chilean is a carboxyl. sent13: the coir does not snuff hemp if that either the quackgrass snuff hemp or it does not din coir or both is not correct. sent14: the coot is a kind of a bungler. sent15: that the Chilean does not snuff shtik is right if the tunic is econometric but not a fiberboard. sent16: the tunic is not econometric. sent17: the tunic is not carboxyl. sent18: if the Chilean is astronomic the coir is a bungler. sent19: if the tunic is not econometric and it is not a fiberboard the Chilean does not snuff shtik. sent20: if the Chilean does not snuff shtik then it is astronomic and/or not maladroit. sent21: if that the tunic does not snuff shtik but it is a bungler does not hold the coir is not a bungler. sent22: the Chilean is astronomic and/or it is not econometric. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent17 -> int1: the tunic is not econometric and it is not a fiberboard.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the Chilean does not snuff shtik.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the Chilean is astronomic or it is non-maladroit or both.; int3 & sent18 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__