the cavity is not an indexing.
sent1: something does awaken if it is a tuna. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a owlet and it does not report lecture is not correct the cavity is not an indexing. sent3: the cavity does not hydrolyze if the broadside reports lecture. sent4: that something is a owlet and does not report lecture is not correct if it hydrolyzes. sent5: there exists something such that that it does report lecture and is not a tuna is false. sent6: the broadside is a kind of a tuna that hydrolyzes. sent7: something reports lecture and/or it is not a owlet if it is not a Rachel. sent8: the broadside does not index if something is a tuna. sent9: the fact that that the broadside reports lecture but it is not a kind of an indexing is right is incorrect if it hydrolyzes.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the broadside does hydrolyze hold.; sent4 -> int2: if the broadside hydrolyzes the fact that it is a owlet that does not report lecture is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the broadside is a owlet but it does not report lecture is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a owlet and it does not report lecture does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the pulque does awaken.
sent1 -> int5: if the pulque is a tuna it does awaken.;
$hypothesis$ = the cavity is not an indexing. ; $context$ = sent1: something does awaken if it is a tuna. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a owlet and it does not report lecture is not correct the cavity is not an indexing. sent3: the cavity does not hydrolyze if the broadside reports lecture. sent4: that something is a owlet and does not report lecture is not correct if it hydrolyzes. sent5: there exists something such that that it does report lecture and is not a tuna is false. sent6: the broadside is a kind of a tuna that hydrolyzes. sent7: something reports lecture and/or it is not a owlet if it is not a Rachel. sent8: the broadside does not index if something is a tuna. sent9: the fact that that the broadside reports lecture but it is not a kind of an indexing is right is incorrect if it hydrolyzes. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the broadside does hydrolyze hold.; sent4 -> int2: if the broadside hydrolyzes the fact that it is a owlet that does not report lecture is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the broadside is a owlet but it does not report lecture is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a owlet and it does not report lecture does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__