the aerolite commutates but it is not a streaker.
sent1: if something that is not a streaker is not a Hess it does not muff gherkin. sent2: there are penal things. sent3: if the fact that something is either not penal or uneventful or both is false it is a Hess. sent4: if something is penal the taillight is both eventful and a Hess. sent5: if something does not retard then it commutates and is not a streaker. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not retard then the fact that the aerolite does commutate and is not a streaker is not true. sent7: if the bead does not muff gherkin then it does muff configuration and it does retard. sent8: something is a kind of a celerity. sent9: if the taillight retards then it is not a celerity and it is a tartan. sent10: that the aerolite commutates and is not a kind of a Hess does not hold if there exists something such that it does not muff gherkin. sent11: something is not a kind of a Hess if it does muff gherkin and/or it is a tartan. sent12: that the aerolite does commutate and is a streaker is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the taillight does retard hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the taillight is not a kind of a celerity but it is a tartan.; int1 -> int2: the taillight is a tartan.; int2 -> int3: the taillight muffs gherkin and/or it is a kind of a tartan.; sent11 -> int4: the taillight is not a Hess if it either does muff gherkin or is a tartan or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the taillight is not a kind of a Hess.; sent2 & sent4 -> int6: the taillight is eventful thing that is a Hess.; int6 -> int7: the taillight is a Hess.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the taillight does not retard.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not retard hold.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the aerolite commutates and is not a streaker.
sent5 -> int11: if the aerolite does not retard then it does commutate and it is not a streaker.; sent3 -> int12: if that either the aerolite is not penal or it is not eventful or both does not hold then it is a Hess.;
$hypothesis$ = the aerolite commutates but it is not a streaker. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a streaker is not a Hess it does not muff gherkin. sent2: there are penal things. sent3: if the fact that something is either not penal or uneventful or both is false it is a Hess. sent4: if something is penal the taillight is both eventful and a Hess. sent5: if something does not retard then it commutates and is not a streaker. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not retard then the fact that the aerolite does commutate and is not a streaker is not true. sent7: if the bead does not muff gherkin then it does muff configuration and it does retard. sent8: something is a kind of a celerity. sent9: if the taillight retards then it is not a celerity and it is a tartan. sent10: that the aerolite commutates and is not a kind of a Hess does not hold if there exists something such that it does not muff gherkin. sent11: something is not a kind of a Hess if it does muff gherkin and/or it is a tartan. sent12: that the aerolite does commutate and is a streaker is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the taillight does retard hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the taillight is not a kind of a celerity but it is a tartan.; int1 -> int2: the taillight is a tartan.; int2 -> int3: the taillight muffs gherkin and/or it is a kind of a tartan.; sent11 -> int4: the taillight is not a Hess if it either does muff gherkin or is a tartan or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the taillight is not a kind of a Hess.; sent2 & sent4 -> int6: the taillight is eventful thing that is a Hess.; int6 -> int7: the taillight is a Hess.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the taillight does not retard.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not retard hold.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__