there exists something such that if the fact that it is not unassertive and it does outshout wildlife does not hold then it is not irremediable.
sent1: if the fact that something does not sediment remark but it is a silvervine does not hold then it is not unfair. sent2: if the wildlife does not outshout wildlife but it is a kind of a scab it does not harangue. sent3: if the fact that the centromere is handless and unassertive is false it does not sediment mitzvah. sent4: there is something such that if that the fact that it is unassertive and does outshout wildlife is not false does not hold it is not irremediable. sent5: if that something does not vociferate and is Jamesian does not hold then it is not backless.
there is something such that if that it does not vociferate and is Jamesian is false then it is not backless.
sent5 -> int1: the trencher is not backless if the fact that it does not vociferate and is not non-Jamesian is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not unassertive and it does outshout wildlife does not hold then it is not irremediable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not sediment remark but it is a silvervine does not hold then it is not unfair. sent2: if the wildlife does not outshout wildlife but it is a kind of a scab it does not harangue. sent3: if the fact that the centromere is handless and unassertive is false it does not sediment mitzvah. sent4: there is something such that if that the fact that it is unassertive and does outshout wildlife is not false does not hold it is not irremediable. sent5: if that something does not vociferate and is Jamesian does not hold then it is not backless. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__