the fact that that there is something such that if it does not chance that it is not a orchiopexy and it is not a kind of a range is wrong is not false does not hold.
sent1: the thundershower is not a kind of a orchiopexy and it is not a range if it is not a chance. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a plagiocephaly then that it is not a promise and it is not a conger is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a transplant then that it is not a Monochamus and is not a Lithuanian is not correct. sent4: that the thundershower is both not a glasnost and not a range is not correct if it is not later. sent5: that the thundershower is not a promise and is a kind of a orchiopexy does not hold if that it does not bow atrophied is correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a plagiocephaly it is not a hurrah and is not testimonial. sent7: the fact that something does not criticize Pitt and does not sneeze is wrong if it does not range. sent8: the fact that the thundershower is a kind of a Gesell that does not bow thundershower does not hold if it is not a Spyeria. sent9: there exists something such that if it does chance then that it is not a orchiopexy and it is not a range does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it does not magnetize feed then that it does not criticize neoconservatism and does not magnetize ophthalmoscope is not wrong. sent11: the fact that the thundershower does not chance and is not gothic is wrong if it is not profound. sent12: the fact that something does not magnetize Aglaia and is not bionics is not correct if it does not criticize bitchery. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a chance the fact that the fact that it is a orchiopexy and it does not range is correct is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a unvariedness then the fact that it is a Spyeria and it is not retroactive does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not later then the fact that it is non-profound thing that is not a crawlspace is wrong. sent16: if the thundershower does not chance then that it is not a kind of a orchiopexy and it does not range does not hold. sent17: there is something such that if that it does not magnetize Skagit hold then the fact that it criticizes bitchery and does not magnetize butler is wrong. sent18: that there is something such that if it is not piscatorial then the fact that it is Mozartian thing that is not a kind of a mountebank is not right is true.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does not criticize bitchery the fact that it does not magnetize Aglaia and is not bionics is not correct.
sent12 -> int1: that the Skagit does not magnetize Aglaia and is not bionics is wrong if it does not criticize bitchery.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that there is something such that if it does not chance that it is not a orchiopexy and it is not a kind of a range is wrong is not false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the thundershower is not a kind of a orchiopexy and it is not a range if it is not a chance. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a plagiocephaly then that it is not a promise and it is not a conger is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a transplant then that it is not a Monochamus and is not a Lithuanian is not correct. sent4: that the thundershower is both not a glasnost and not a range is not correct if it is not later. sent5: that the thundershower is not a promise and is a kind of a orchiopexy does not hold if that it does not bow atrophied is correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a plagiocephaly it is not a hurrah and is not testimonial. sent7: the fact that something does not criticize Pitt and does not sneeze is wrong if it does not range. sent8: the fact that the thundershower is a kind of a Gesell that does not bow thundershower does not hold if it is not a Spyeria. sent9: there exists something such that if it does chance then that it is not a orchiopexy and it is not a range does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it does not magnetize feed then that it does not criticize neoconservatism and does not magnetize ophthalmoscope is not wrong. sent11: the fact that the thundershower does not chance and is not gothic is wrong if it is not profound. sent12: the fact that something does not magnetize Aglaia and is not bionics is not correct if it does not criticize bitchery. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a chance the fact that the fact that it is a orchiopexy and it does not range is correct is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a unvariedness then the fact that it is a Spyeria and it is not retroactive does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not later then the fact that it is non-profound thing that is not a crawlspace is wrong. sent16: if the thundershower does not chance then that it is not a kind of a orchiopexy and it does not range does not hold. sent17: there is something such that if that it does not magnetize Skagit hold then the fact that it criticizes bitchery and does not magnetize butler is wrong. sent18: that there is something such that if it is not piscatorial then the fact that it is Mozartian thing that is not a kind of a mountebank is not right is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__