the determinant is non-conciliatory.
sent1: that the determinant is conciliatory is not incorrect if the bookworm is conciliatory. sent2: something does not deflower banning-order if it is not a hang. sent3: something does deflower Pitot if it is not a mews and it does not deflower blown. sent4: the crop does not depressurize. sent5: that the determinant is not conciliatory hold if the bookworm is not a whitewash. sent6: if something deflowers Pitot the fact that it does not palatalize ninth and is not a Amish is not correct. sent7: something is antigenic if the fact that it does not palatalize ninth and is not a kind of a Amish does not hold. sent8: if that the crop is not a Swedenborg and is not a chopper does not hold then it is not a mews. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not deflower relativism and it deflowers blown does not hold. sent10: the determinant is not a whitewash. sent11: if the NAD is not a whitewash the bookworm is a kind of conciliatory an evacuee. sent12: if the crop does not depressurize the fact that it is not a Swedenborg and it is not a chopper is false. sent13: the bookworm is not an evacuee. sent14: the missal is not an evacuee. sent15: the determinant does not jacket salve. sent16: that the determinant is not a kind of an evacuee is right. sent17: if something is antigenic the fact that it is not irreverent and it does not sweeten is not correct. sent18: the whitecup is not conciliatory. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not deflower relativism and it does deflower blown is not right then the crop does not deflower blown. sent20: that the saddleback does not hang if the fact that the crop is not irreverent and does not sweeten does not hold is right.
the determinant is conciliatory.
sent2 -> int1: if the saddleback is not a hang it does not deflower banning-order.; sent17 -> int2: if the crop is antigenic then the fact that it is non-irreverent thing that does not sweeten is not correct.; sent7 -> int3: that the crop is antigenic is not wrong if that it does not palatalize ninth and is not a Amish does not hold.; sent6 -> int4: that the crop does not palatalize ninth and it is not a Amish is not correct if it does deflower Pitot.; sent3 -> int5: the crop does deflower Pitot if it does not mew and it does not deflower blown.; sent12 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the crop is not a Swedenborg and it is not a kind of a chopper is incorrect.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the crop does not mew.; sent9 & sent19 -> int8: that the fact that the crop does deflower blown is not false is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the crop does not mew and it does not deflower blown.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the crop deflowers Pitot.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the crop does not palatalize ninth and it is not a kind of a Amish is false.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the crop is antigenic.; int2 & int12 -> int13: that the crop is not irreverent and does not sweeten does not hold.; sent20 & int13 -> int14: the saddleback is not a kind of a hang.; int1 & int14 -> int15: the saddleback does not deflower banning-order.; int15 -> int16: the saddleback is lineal or does not deflower banning-order or both.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is lineal or does not deflower banning-order or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the determinant is non-conciliatory. ; $context$ = sent1: that the determinant is conciliatory is not incorrect if the bookworm is conciliatory. sent2: something does not deflower banning-order if it is not a hang. sent3: something does deflower Pitot if it is not a mews and it does not deflower blown. sent4: the crop does not depressurize. sent5: that the determinant is not conciliatory hold if the bookworm is not a whitewash. sent6: if something deflowers Pitot the fact that it does not palatalize ninth and is not a Amish is not correct. sent7: something is antigenic if the fact that it does not palatalize ninth and is not a kind of a Amish does not hold. sent8: if that the crop is not a Swedenborg and is not a chopper does not hold then it is not a mews. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not deflower relativism and it deflowers blown does not hold. sent10: the determinant is not a whitewash. sent11: if the NAD is not a whitewash the bookworm is a kind of conciliatory an evacuee. sent12: if the crop does not depressurize the fact that it is not a Swedenborg and it is not a chopper is false. sent13: the bookworm is not an evacuee. sent14: the missal is not an evacuee. sent15: the determinant does not jacket salve. sent16: that the determinant is not a kind of an evacuee is right. sent17: if something is antigenic the fact that it is not irreverent and it does not sweeten is not correct. sent18: the whitecup is not conciliatory. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not deflower relativism and it does deflower blown is not right then the crop does not deflower blown. sent20: that the saddleback does not hang if the fact that the crop is not irreverent and does not sweeten does not hold is right. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__