something is trackless and it is a positivist.
sent1: the fact that the coroner is immobile is correct. sent2: the fact that the Bahai is non-positivist thing that is not a Noruz does not hold if the restaurant is not healthy. sent3: the fact that the Bahai is both healthy and not a Noruz is false if the restaurant is not trackless. sent4: the workbasket is a kind of a nightwear. sent5: the restaurant is a positivist. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not healthy and is not a Noruz is not right the foghorn is a nightwear. sent7: if the restaurant is not trackless then that the Bahai is not healthy and it is not a Noruz is not correct. sent8: if there is something such that it is trackless the fact that the restaurant is not a walkabout and it is not a seniti is false. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it does not housekeep sheep-tick and is not non-Levitical is incorrect. sent10: if something is a nightwear then the fact that it is not positivist and it is not trackless is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the restaurant is not trackless.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Bahai is unhealthy thing that is not a kind of a Noruz is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not healthy and it is not a Noruz is not correct.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the foghorn is a kind of a nightwear.;
there exists something such that that it is not a walkabout and is not a seniti is not true.
sent10 -> int4: the fact that that the eagle is not a positivist and it is not trackless is not true is not incorrect if it is a nightwear.;
$hypothesis$ = something is trackless and it is a positivist. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the coroner is immobile is correct. sent2: the fact that the Bahai is non-positivist thing that is not a Noruz does not hold if the restaurant is not healthy. sent3: the fact that the Bahai is both healthy and not a Noruz is false if the restaurant is not trackless. sent4: the workbasket is a kind of a nightwear. sent5: the restaurant is a positivist. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not healthy and is not a Noruz is not right the foghorn is a nightwear. sent7: if the restaurant is not trackless then that the Bahai is not healthy and it is not a Noruz is not correct. sent8: if there is something such that it is trackless the fact that the restaurant is not a walkabout and it is not a seniti is false. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it does not housekeep sheep-tick and is not non-Levitical is incorrect. sent10: if something is a nightwear then the fact that it is not positivist and it is not trackless is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the restaurant is not trackless.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Bahai is unhealthy thing that is not a kind of a Noruz is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not healthy and it is not a Noruz is not correct.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the foghorn is a kind of a nightwear.; __UNKNOWN__