the birdcall is both diastolic and significant.
sent1: the fact that the birdcall is diastolic is not false if that it is not spiritless and not a transmittance is not right. sent2: if that something is a Tussaud but it is not significant does not hold it is significant. sent3: the fact that the birdcall is a Tussaud but it is not significant is not true. sent4: if either something is not spiritless or it is not a Conospermum or both then it is not a kind of a Conospermum. sent5: the launchpad is a kind of an impressionist. sent6: the fact that the fact that the birdcall is not spiritless and is not a transmittance is true is wrong if the launchpad is not spiritless. sent7: if something is not a Conospermum then that it is both diastolic and significant is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the launchpad is a Conospermum and is not an impressionist.; assump1 -> int1: the launchpad is not an impressionist.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the launchpad is a kind of a Conospermum but it is not a kind of an impressionist does not hold.; sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the birdcall is a Tussaud and is not significant is not right then it is significant.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the birdcall is significant.;
that the birdcall is diastolic and significant does not hold.
sent7 -> int6: if the birdcall is not a Conospermum the fact that it is diastolic thing that is significant is false.; sent4 -> int7: if the birdcall is not spiritless or it is not a Conospermum or both it is not a Conospermum.;
$hypothesis$ = the birdcall is both diastolic and significant. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the birdcall is diastolic is not false if that it is not spiritless and not a transmittance is not right. sent2: if that something is a Tussaud but it is not significant does not hold it is significant. sent3: the fact that the birdcall is a Tussaud but it is not significant is not true. sent4: if either something is not spiritless or it is not a Conospermum or both then it is not a kind of a Conospermum. sent5: the launchpad is a kind of an impressionist. sent6: the fact that the fact that the birdcall is not spiritless and is not a transmittance is true is wrong if the launchpad is not spiritless. sent7: if something is not a Conospermum then that it is both diastolic and significant is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the launchpad is a Conospermum and is not an impressionist.; assump1 -> int1: the launchpad is not an impressionist.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the launchpad is a kind of a Conospermum but it is not a kind of an impressionist does not hold.; sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the birdcall is a Tussaud and is not significant is not right then it is significant.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the birdcall is significant.; __UNKNOWN__