either the comedown does not occur or the consecrating does not occur or both.
sent1: the postictalness does not occur. sent2: if that the non-postictalness and/or the adducting verb occurs is not correct then the hydrophilicness does not occur. sent3: if the domesticness does not occur the fact that the fact that the anthropocentricness or the turning hagfish or both occurs is right is incorrect. sent4: if the vroom does not occur then that the galacticness happens and the dalliance happens is not correct. sent5: the turning hagfish and the hydrophilicness occurs if the postictalness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the anthropocentricness happens or the turning hagfish happens or both is not correct that the numbing does not occur hold. sent7: that the wrath does not occur causes that the limping does not occur. sent8: the osseousness does not occur if the fact that the galacticness occurs and the dalliance happens is not true. sent9: the fact that the turning hagfish does not occur is correct if not the resultant but the antennalness occurs. sent10: if the turning Nehemiah does not occur or the limping does not occur or both then the turning clip-on occurs. sent11: the fact that the postictalness does not occur and/or the adducting verb occurs is wrong if the adducting rainstorm does not occur. sent12: the wearing Kichaga and/or that the wrath does not occur is triggered by the non-osseousness. sent13: if the anthropocentricness does not occur that the incumbency does not occur and the domesticness happens does not hold. sent14: if the wearing Kichaga happens or the wrath does not occur or both then the wrath does not occur. sent15: that the resultant does not occur but the antennalness happens is caused by that the anthropocentricness happens. sent16: if the hydrophilicness does not occur then the comedown occurs and the consecrating happens. sent17: the hydrophilicness occurs. sent18: if the fact that the fact that the incumbency does not occur but the domestic occurs hold does not hold then the fact that the rounding occurs is not correct. sent19: if the rounding does not occur then the comedown does not occur or the consecrating does not occur or both. sent20: the adducting rainstorm does not occur if the turning clip-on happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anthropocentricness happens.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: not the resultant but the antennalness occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the turning hagfish does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the turning hagfish and the hydrophilicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the turning hagfish occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the anthropocentricness does not occur.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: that the incumbency does not occur and the domesticness happens is not correct.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the roundness does not occur.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
that the comedown does not occur and/or the consecrating does not occur is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = either the comedown does not occur or the consecrating does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the postictalness does not occur. sent2: if that the non-postictalness and/or the adducting verb occurs is not correct then the hydrophilicness does not occur. sent3: if the domesticness does not occur the fact that the fact that the anthropocentricness or the turning hagfish or both occurs is right is incorrect. sent4: if the vroom does not occur then that the galacticness happens and the dalliance happens is not correct. sent5: the turning hagfish and the hydrophilicness occurs if the postictalness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the anthropocentricness happens or the turning hagfish happens or both is not correct that the numbing does not occur hold. sent7: that the wrath does not occur causes that the limping does not occur. sent8: the osseousness does not occur if the fact that the galacticness occurs and the dalliance happens is not true. sent9: the fact that the turning hagfish does not occur is correct if not the resultant but the antennalness occurs. sent10: if the turning Nehemiah does not occur or the limping does not occur or both then the turning clip-on occurs. sent11: the fact that the postictalness does not occur and/or the adducting verb occurs is wrong if the adducting rainstorm does not occur. sent12: the wearing Kichaga and/or that the wrath does not occur is triggered by the non-osseousness. sent13: if the anthropocentricness does not occur that the incumbency does not occur and the domesticness happens does not hold. sent14: if the wearing Kichaga happens or the wrath does not occur or both then the wrath does not occur. sent15: that the resultant does not occur but the antennalness happens is caused by that the anthropocentricness happens. sent16: if the hydrophilicness does not occur then the comedown occurs and the consecrating happens. sent17: the hydrophilicness occurs. sent18: if the fact that the fact that the incumbency does not occur but the domestic occurs hold does not hold then the fact that the rounding occurs is not correct. sent19: if the rounding does not occur then the comedown does not occur or the consecrating does not occur or both. sent20: the adducting rainstorm does not occur if the turning clip-on happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anthropocentricness happens.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: not the resultant but the antennalness occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the turning hagfish does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the turning hagfish and the hydrophilicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the turning hagfish occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the anthropocentricness does not occur.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: that the incumbency does not occur and the domesticness happens is not correct.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the roundness does not occur.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__