there is something such that if it is a kind of a cologne and it does not emblazon vivarium the fact that it is not a sneeze hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it does revenge ecstasy and it is not visible it is not a kind of a Anguillula. sent2: if something is a cologne but it does not emblazon vivarium it is not a sneeze. sent3: there is something such that if it is both part-time and not aesculapian then it is not turbinate. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a cologne and does not emblazon vivarium the fact that it is a sneeze is true. sent5: if something is a kind of a cologne and it emblazons vivarium then it is not a sneeze. sent6: if the lysozyme does revenge assignor but it is not nonlinguistic then it is not a kind of a cologne. sent7: the lysozyme does sneeze if it is a cologne that does not emblazon vivarium. sent8: if something is not non-theocratic but non-Kantian it wins. sent9: if something that does settle Anser is not diagonalizable it does revenge superbug. sent10: if the lysozyme does litigate but it is not a kind of a cologne then it is not a win. sent11: if a acronymic thing does not emblazon Almoravid then it does not emblazon. sent12: if the lysozyme is a cologne and it emblazons vivarium then it is not a sneeze. sent13: if something that is a kind of an ade is not irreplaceable it does not scab.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the lysozyme is not the sneeze if the lysozyme is a kind of a cologne but it does not emblazon vivarium is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of a cologne and it does not emblazon vivarium the fact that it is not a sneeze hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does revenge ecstasy and it is not visible it is not a kind of a Anguillula. sent2: if something is a cologne but it does not emblazon vivarium it is not a sneeze. sent3: there is something such that if it is both part-time and not aesculapian then it is not turbinate. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a cologne and does not emblazon vivarium the fact that it is a sneeze is true. sent5: if something is a kind of a cologne and it emblazons vivarium then it is not a sneeze. sent6: if the lysozyme does revenge assignor but it is not nonlinguistic then it is not a kind of a cologne. sent7: the lysozyme does sneeze if it is a cologne that does not emblazon vivarium. sent8: if something is not non-theocratic but non-Kantian it wins. sent9: if something that does settle Anser is not diagonalizable it does revenge superbug. sent10: if the lysozyme does litigate but it is not a kind of a cologne then it is not a win. sent11: if a acronymic thing does not emblazon Almoravid then it does not emblazon. sent12: if the lysozyme is a cologne and it emblazons vivarium then it is not a sneeze. sent13: if something that is a kind of an ade is not irreplaceable it does not scab. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the lysozyme is not the sneeze if the lysozyme is a kind of a cologne but it does not emblazon vivarium is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__