the hypnotizing ethics does not occur.
sent1: if the hypnotizing melodiousness does not occur the caesuralness occurs and the prey does not occur. sent2: the nephrotomy does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the waggery happens and the badgering happens is incorrect the nephrotomy does not occur. sent4: if the exclaiming HS2 does not occur that both the waggery and the badgering happens is false. sent5: that the exclaiming HS2 does not occur and the reversionariness does not occur is caused by that the micaceousness occurs. sent6: that the hypsography occurs and the obliqueness occurs causes the non-spicateness. sent7: if the hypnotizing melodiousness happens the nonspatialness happens. sent8: if the spicateness does not occur the hysterics and the viticulture occurs. sent9: the caesuralness occurs if that the prey occurs is true. sent10: the nonspatialness does not occur and the hypnotizing melodiousness does not occur if the caesuralness happens. sent11: the preying does not occur. sent12: the micaceousness occurs if the hysterics happens. sent13: if the hypnotizing melodiousness does not occur the prey does not occur. sent14: the nonspatialness does not occur and the nephrotomy does not occur. sent15: if the caesuralness occurs but the prey does not occur the hypnotizing ethics occurs. sent16: if both the caesuralness and the preying occurs the hypnotizing ethics happens. sent17: if the fact that the heroics but not the prey happens is false then the prey occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hypnotizing melodiousness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the nonspatialness occurs.; sent14 -> int2: the nonspatialness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the hypnotizing melodiousness does not occur.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the caesuralness but not the preying happens.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the hypnotizing ethics does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the hypnotizing ethics does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hypnotizing melodiousness does not occur the caesuralness occurs and the prey does not occur. sent2: the nephrotomy does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the waggery happens and the badgering happens is incorrect the nephrotomy does not occur. sent4: if the exclaiming HS2 does not occur that both the waggery and the badgering happens is false. sent5: that the exclaiming HS2 does not occur and the reversionariness does not occur is caused by that the micaceousness occurs. sent6: that the hypsography occurs and the obliqueness occurs causes the non-spicateness. sent7: if the hypnotizing melodiousness happens the nonspatialness happens. sent8: if the spicateness does not occur the hysterics and the viticulture occurs. sent9: the caesuralness occurs if that the prey occurs is true. sent10: the nonspatialness does not occur and the hypnotizing melodiousness does not occur if the caesuralness happens. sent11: the preying does not occur. sent12: the micaceousness occurs if the hysterics happens. sent13: if the hypnotizing melodiousness does not occur the prey does not occur. sent14: the nonspatialness does not occur and the nephrotomy does not occur. sent15: if the caesuralness occurs but the prey does not occur the hypnotizing ethics occurs. sent16: if both the caesuralness and the preying occurs the hypnotizing ethics happens. sent17: if the fact that the heroics but not the prey happens is false then the prey occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hypnotizing melodiousness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the nonspatialness occurs.; sent14 -> int2: the nonspatialness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the hypnotizing melodiousness does not occur.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the caesuralness but not the preying happens.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__