the australopithecine is not a kind of a brougham.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it does not weld Yazoo and is not a hemiparasite is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the sidesman is not a headshake and not a pluralization is false the fact that the adolescent does weld Yazoo hold. sent3: the fact that the wheatear is a kind of a hemiparasite hold if the fact that the adolescent is a kind of a pluralization but it is not a kind of a Skaw is not correct. sent4: the fact that the fact that that the sidesman is not syllogistic but a headshake is not wrong is false is not incorrect. sent5: if something does reimburse filename then it is a hemiparasite. sent6: the fact that the megaphone is not a headshake and it is not pineal is not true. sent7: the adolescent does reimburse filename if that the Coloradan does not destain interviewer and it is not a smear is wrong. sent8: the fact that the Coloradan destains interviewer and is not a hemiparasite is false if it smears. sent9: if something does weld Yazoo then that it is not syllogistic and it is not a headshake is not correct. sent10: the sidesman does not reimburse filename if the adolescent is a headshake that welds Yazoo. sent11: the australopithecine intercommunicates. sent12: the fact that the australopithecine is a kind of a headshake but it is not a brougham is false. sent13: if the wheatear is a hemiparasite the fact that the sidesman does weld Yazoo hold. sent14: the sidesman is transcultural. sent15: if the sidesman smears then that it does not reimburse filename and it is not syllogistic does not hold. sent16: the fact that the adolescent is syllogistic is right if the sidesman does reimburse filename. sent17: the sidesman is a brougham. sent18: if something welds Yazoo that it is syllogistic and is not a kind of a headshake is not true. sent19: that the fact that the adolescent is both a pluralization and a Skaw is false is true. sent20: something is a kind of a brougham if it is a kind of a hemiparasite. sent21: if the adolescent is a kind of a pluralization and is not a Skaw it does not reimburse filename. sent22: if there exists something such that that it is not syllogistic and it is not a headshake is wrong the australopithecine is not a brougham. sent23: the fact that that the Coloradan does not destain interviewer and it is not a smear is correct is not right. sent24: the wheatear is a pluralization.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adolescent is both a pluralization and not a Skaw.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the adolescent does not reimburse filename.; sent7 & sent23 -> int2: the adolescent reimburses filename.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the adolescent is both a pluralization and not a Skaw is incorrect.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the wheatear is a hemiparasite.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the sidesman does weld Yazoo.; sent9 -> int7: if the sidesman does weld Yazoo the fact that it is not syllogistic and it is not a headshake is not true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the sidesman is non-syllogistic thing that is not a kind of a headshake is not correct.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is not syllogistic and it is not a kind of a headshake is not correct.; int9 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the australopithecine is a brougham.
sent20 -> int10: the australopithecine is a kind of a brougham if it is a hemiparasite.; sent5 -> int11: if the australopithecine reimburses filename then it is a kind of a hemiparasite.;
$hypothesis$ = the australopithecine is not a kind of a brougham. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it does not weld Yazoo and is not a hemiparasite is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the sidesman is not a headshake and not a pluralization is false the fact that the adolescent does weld Yazoo hold. sent3: the fact that the wheatear is a kind of a hemiparasite hold if the fact that the adolescent is a kind of a pluralization but it is not a kind of a Skaw is not correct. sent4: the fact that the fact that that the sidesman is not syllogistic but a headshake is not wrong is false is not incorrect. sent5: if something does reimburse filename then it is a hemiparasite. sent6: the fact that the megaphone is not a headshake and it is not pineal is not true. sent7: the adolescent does reimburse filename if that the Coloradan does not destain interviewer and it is not a smear is wrong. sent8: the fact that the Coloradan destains interviewer and is not a hemiparasite is false if it smears. sent9: if something does weld Yazoo then that it is not syllogistic and it is not a headshake is not correct. sent10: the sidesman does not reimburse filename if the adolescent is a headshake that welds Yazoo. sent11: the australopithecine intercommunicates. sent12: the fact that the australopithecine is a kind of a headshake but it is not a brougham is false. sent13: if the wheatear is a hemiparasite the fact that the sidesman does weld Yazoo hold. sent14: the sidesman is transcultural. sent15: if the sidesman smears then that it does not reimburse filename and it is not syllogistic does not hold. sent16: the fact that the adolescent is syllogistic is right if the sidesman does reimburse filename. sent17: the sidesman is a brougham. sent18: if something welds Yazoo that it is syllogistic and is not a kind of a headshake is not true. sent19: that the fact that the adolescent is both a pluralization and a Skaw is false is true. sent20: something is a kind of a brougham if it is a kind of a hemiparasite. sent21: if the adolescent is a kind of a pluralization and is not a Skaw it does not reimburse filename. sent22: if there exists something such that that it is not syllogistic and it is not a headshake is wrong the australopithecine is not a brougham. sent23: the fact that that the Coloradan does not destain interviewer and it is not a smear is correct is not right. sent24: the wheatear is a pluralization. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adolescent is both a pluralization and not a Skaw.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the adolescent does not reimburse filename.; sent7 & sent23 -> int2: the adolescent reimburses filename.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the adolescent is both a pluralization and not a Skaw is incorrect.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the wheatear is a hemiparasite.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the sidesman does weld Yazoo.; sent9 -> int7: if the sidesman does weld Yazoo the fact that it is not syllogistic and it is not a headshake is not true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the sidesman is non-syllogistic thing that is not a kind of a headshake is not correct.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is not syllogistic and it is not a kind of a headshake is not correct.; int9 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__