the GAD is a kitsch but it does not measure Ignatius.
sent1: if that the GAD is not a kind of a tracer but it is lexical is false the fact that the corner is not a kind of a kitsch is correct. sent2: that the production is not a kitsch is right. sent3: the GAD does incubate if it is not a kitsch. sent4: the corner is not a allogamy if something that does not incubate is Florentine. sent5: the fact that the corner is a lerot and it is the acuity if the corner is not a epigastrium is true. sent6: the GAD is not lexical if something does not incubate and is a kind of a tracer. sent7: something is a kitsch but it does not measure Ignatius if it is not lexical. sent8: the GAD is a kitsch. sent9: if that the corner does not incubate but it is a tracer is not right then the production is not a allogamy. sent10: the fact that if the fact that something is not a allogamy is not wrong then it is lexical thing that is a kind of a Florentine is not wrong. sent11: the GAD deposits hydroxyl. sent12: the corner does not measure Ignatius. sent13: that the production is not a kind of a allogamy is not false if the corner does incubate. sent14: the corner is a kind of a kitsch if it is a kind of a lerot. sent15: the production is both a allogamy and Florentine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the corner does not incubate and is a tracer is false is true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the production is not a allogamy.; sent15 -> int2: the production is a allogamy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the corner does not incubate and is a tracer.; int4 -> int5: something does not incubate but it is a kind of a tracer.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the GAD is not lexical.; sent7 -> int7: if that the GAD is not lexical is correct then it is a kind of a kitsch that does not measure Ignatius.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the GAD is not non-Florentine.
sent10 -> int8: if the GAD is not a kind of a allogamy then it is not non-lexical and is a Florentine.;
$hypothesis$ = the GAD is a kitsch but it does not measure Ignatius. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the GAD is not a kind of a tracer but it is lexical is false the fact that the corner is not a kind of a kitsch is correct. sent2: that the production is not a kitsch is right. sent3: the GAD does incubate if it is not a kitsch. sent4: the corner is not a allogamy if something that does not incubate is Florentine. sent5: the fact that the corner is a lerot and it is the acuity if the corner is not a epigastrium is true. sent6: the GAD is not lexical if something does not incubate and is a kind of a tracer. sent7: something is a kitsch but it does not measure Ignatius if it is not lexical. sent8: the GAD is a kitsch. sent9: if that the corner does not incubate but it is a tracer is not right then the production is not a allogamy. sent10: the fact that if the fact that something is not a allogamy is not wrong then it is lexical thing that is a kind of a Florentine is not wrong. sent11: the GAD deposits hydroxyl. sent12: the corner does not measure Ignatius. sent13: that the production is not a kind of a allogamy is not false if the corner does incubate. sent14: the corner is a kind of a kitsch if it is a kind of a lerot. sent15: the production is both a allogamy and Florentine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the corner does not incubate and is a tracer is false is true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the production is not a allogamy.; sent15 -> int2: the production is a allogamy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the corner does not incubate and is a tracer.; int4 -> int5: something does not incubate but it is a kind of a tracer.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the GAD is not lexical.; sent7 -> int7: if that the GAD is not lexical is correct then it is a kind of a kitsch that does not measure Ignatius.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__