that that the fundamentals does not occur leads to that the scoffing prurigo does not occur and the scoffing honeyed does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the scoffing Lammastide does not occur if the steadying happens and/or the salamandriformness does not occur. sent2: the steadying occurs and/or the republican occurs. sent3: the scoffing prurigo does not occur and the monisticness does not occur. sent4: that the scoffing honeyed does not occur is caused by either that the steadiness does not occur or that the republican occurs or both. sent5: the fundamentals occurs if the scoffing Lammastide does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steadiness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the steadying or the non-salamandriformness or both occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the scoffing Lammastide does not occur hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fundamentals occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fundamentals does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the steadiness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the steadying does not occur and/or the republican happens is correct.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the scoffing honeyed does not occur.; sent3 -> int8: the scoffing prurigo does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the scoffing prurigo does not occur and the scoffing honeyed does not occur.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the fundamentals does not occur leads to that the scoffing prurigo does not occur and the scoffing honeyed does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the scoffing Lammastide does not occur if the steadying happens and/or the salamandriformness does not occur. sent2: the steadying occurs and/or the republican occurs. sent3: the scoffing prurigo does not occur and the monisticness does not occur. sent4: that the scoffing honeyed does not occur is caused by either that the steadiness does not occur or that the republican occurs or both. sent5: the fundamentals occurs if the scoffing Lammastide does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steadiness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the steadying or the non-salamandriformness or both occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the scoffing Lammastide does not occur hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fundamentals occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fundamentals does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the steadiness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the steadying does not occur and/or the republican happens is correct.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the scoffing honeyed does not occur.; sent3 -> int8: the scoffing prurigo does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the scoffing prurigo does not occur and the scoffing honeyed does not occur.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__