something is bromic but it does not teach OD.
sent1: something is a denaturant if the fact that it does network nailer and is not an outsider does not hold. sent2: the Iranian does teach OD if the mudskipper is a denaturant. sent3: if the Iranian does not teach OD then the pogonion is bromic but it does not teach OD. sent4: the pogonion is bromic. sent5: something is bromic thing that teaches OD. sent6: something is bromic if the fact that it is hilar hold. sent7: if the tartlet does not network nailer it is a kind of a denaturant. sent8: if the tartlet cans the fact that it is not hilar is not incorrect. sent9: something does not teach OD. sent10: the Iranian does not teach OD if that the tartlet does network nailer and is not an outsider is not incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the pinprick is lower-class and it does can does not hold it is not a kind of a can. sent12: the fact that the tartlet does can is not false. sent13: something is a denaturant if it does not network nailer. sent14: that the tartlet is non-hilar is true. sent15: if the tartlet cans then it is not hilar and it does not jibe. sent16: there is something such that it is bromic. sent17: the pogonion is bromic if the Iranian does not teach OD. sent18: if the inula is bromic then the mudskipper is a kind of a denaturant. sent19: if that the pinprick is not hilar but it networks bread-bin is not correct the inula is hilar. sent20: the tartlet does network nailer. sent21: if the tartlet is hilar but it does not jibe then it is not a denaturant. sent22: something that is a kind of non-hilar thing that does not jibe is not a kind of a denaturant. sent23: something is not a denaturant if it is hilar and does not jibe. sent24: the fact that the pinprick is not hilar but it networks bread-bin is incorrect if it does not can.
sent1 -> int1: the tartlet is a denaturant if that it does network nailer and is not a kind of an outsider is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tartlet does network nailer and is not a kind of an outsider is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tartlet is a denaturant.; sent22 -> int3: if the tartlet is not hilar and it does not jibe then it is not a denaturant.; sent15 & sent12 -> int4: the tartlet is not hilar and it does not jibe.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tartlet is not a denaturant.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the tartlet networks nailer but it is not an outsider.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the Iranian does not teach OD.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the pogonion is a kind of bromic thing that does not teach OD.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the pogonion does sediment Frankfurt but it does not jibe.
sent6 -> int10: the inula is bromic if it is hilar.;
$hypothesis$ = something is bromic but it does not teach OD. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a denaturant if the fact that it does network nailer and is not an outsider does not hold. sent2: the Iranian does teach OD if the mudskipper is a denaturant. sent3: if the Iranian does not teach OD then the pogonion is bromic but it does not teach OD. sent4: the pogonion is bromic. sent5: something is bromic thing that teaches OD. sent6: something is bromic if the fact that it is hilar hold. sent7: if the tartlet does not network nailer it is a kind of a denaturant. sent8: if the tartlet cans the fact that it is not hilar is not incorrect. sent9: something does not teach OD. sent10: the Iranian does not teach OD if that the tartlet does network nailer and is not an outsider is not incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the pinprick is lower-class and it does can does not hold it is not a kind of a can. sent12: the fact that the tartlet does can is not false. sent13: something is a denaturant if it does not network nailer. sent14: that the tartlet is non-hilar is true. sent15: if the tartlet cans then it is not hilar and it does not jibe. sent16: there is something such that it is bromic. sent17: the pogonion is bromic if the Iranian does not teach OD. sent18: if the inula is bromic then the mudskipper is a kind of a denaturant. sent19: if that the pinprick is not hilar but it networks bread-bin is not correct the inula is hilar. sent20: the tartlet does network nailer. sent21: if the tartlet is hilar but it does not jibe then it is not a denaturant. sent22: something that is a kind of non-hilar thing that does not jibe is not a kind of a denaturant. sent23: something is not a denaturant if it is hilar and does not jibe. sent24: the fact that the pinprick is not hilar but it networks bread-bin is incorrect if it does not can. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the tartlet is a denaturant if that it does network nailer and is not a kind of an outsider is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tartlet does network nailer and is not a kind of an outsider is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tartlet is a denaturant.; sent22 -> int3: if the tartlet is not hilar and it does not jibe then it is not a denaturant.; sent15 & sent12 -> int4: the tartlet is not hilar and it does not jibe.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tartlet is not a denaturant.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the tartlet networks nailer but it is not an outsider.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the Iranian does not teach OD.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the pogonion is a kind of bromic thing that does not teach OD.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__