the cohabitation does not occur.
sent1: the commutating quarantine results in that the unquestionableness happens. sent2: if that the immobileness happens and the commutating quarantine occurs does not hold then that the immobileness does not occur is true. sent3: the thrombosing happens. sent4: the commutating quarantine is caused by that the debut happens and the commutating polypropenonitrile does not occur. sent5: that the salting occurs results in that the aesculapianness occurs. sent6: if that the aesculapianness does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur is wrong then the fact that the thrombosing occurs is not wrong. sent7: the thrombosing happens if the aesculapianness does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the aesculapianness does not occur is correct then the three-hitter occurs and the thrombosing happens. sent9: if the debuting and the commutating polypropenonitrile occurs the commutating quarantine occurs. sent10: the fact that the aesculapianness does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur does not hold if the salting does not occur. sent11: the commutating mutilator occurs. sent12: the debut but not the commutating polypropenonitrile happens. sent13: the salting does not occur if the fact that the insectivorousness does not occur is not wrong. sent14: the consummating eremitism does not occur if the dyeing and the bewaring occurs. sent15: if the three-hitter does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur the commutating quarantine does not occur. sent16: the commutating polypropenonitrile does not occur. sent17: that the cohabitation occurs is prevented by that the unquestionableness occurs and the three-hitter occurs. sent18: the fact that the immobileness happens and the commutating quarantine happens is wrong if the unquestionableness does not occur.
sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the commutating quarantine happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the unquestionableness occurs.;
the immobileness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the cohabitation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the commutating quarantine results in that the unquestionableness happens. sent2: if that the immobileness happens and the commutating quarantine occurs does not hold then that the immobileness does not occur is true. sent3: the thrombosing happens. sent4: the commutating quarantine is caused by that the debut happens and the commutating polypropenonitrile does not occur. sent5: that the salting occurs results in that the aesculapianness occurs. sent6: if that the aesculapianness does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur is wrong then the fact that the thrombosing occurs is not wrong. sent7: the thrombosing happens if the aesculapianness does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the aesculapianness does not occur is correct then the three-hitter occurs and the thrombosing happens. sent9: if the debuting and the commutating polypropenonitrile occurs the commutating quarantine occurs. sent10: the fact that the aesculapianness does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur does not hold if the salting does not occur. sent11: the commutating mutilator occurs. sent12: the debut but not the commutating polypropenonitrile happens. sent13: the salting does not occur if the fact that the insectivorousness does not occur is not wrong. sent14: the consummating eremitism does not occur if the dyeing and the bewaring occurs. sent15: if the three-hitter does not occur and the thrombosing does not occur the commutating quarantine does not occur. sent16: the commutating polypropenonitrile does not occur. sent17: that the cohabitation occurs is prevented by that the unquestionableness occurs and the three-hitter occurs. sent18: the fact that the immobileness happens and the commutating quarantine happens is wrong if the unquestionableness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the commutating quarantine happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the unquestionableness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__