that that the dwarfing Hinayanism happens and the debate happens is caused by that the interfering fluidram does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the debate does not occur and the checkout does not occur if the bathe does not occur. sent2: if the indulgentness occurs the intercession does not occur. sent3: the dwarfing Hinayanism occurs if the historiography happens. sent4: that the retrospective happens is brought about by that the intercession does not occur but the discounting happens. sent5: the dwarfing Hinayanism occurs if that the historiography does not occur but the insubstantialness happens is wrong. sent6: if the interfering fluidram occurs then that not the historiography but the insubstantialness occurs is not correct. sent7: the footstep occurs. sent8: not the checkout but the bathing occurs. sent9: if the interfering fluidram does not occur then that the historiography does not occur but the insubstantialness occurs is false. sent10: the bathe happens. sent11: the escorting manumission is triggered by that the interfering fluidram occurs. sent12: that the retrospective happens yields that the bathing does not occur but the abnormalness occurs. sent13: if the unmindfulness does not occur the sinistralness and the uplifting Sangay happens. sent14: if the feeling does not occur that not the uplifting Sangay but the scalding occurs does not hold. sent15: the debating is triggered by that the checkout does not occur. sent16: the insideness does not occur. sent17: the fact that both the historiography and the insubstantialness happens is not right. sent18: that the dwarfing planchet occurs is right. sent19: if the interfering fluidram does not occur then the fact that the historiography and the insubstantialness happens does not hold. sent20: if the interfering fluidram happens then both the dwarfing Hinayanism and the debating occurs. sent21: the riptide occurs. sent22: the chancing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the interfering fluidram does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the historiography but the insubstantialness occurs is not right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the dwarfing Hinayanism happens.; sent8 -> int3: the checkout does not occur.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the debating happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the dwarfing Hinayanism happens and the debate happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the escorting manumission happens.
$hypothesis$ = that that the dwarfing Hinayanism happens and the debate happens is caused by that the interfering fluidram does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the debate does not occur and the checkout does not occur if the bathe does not occur. sent2: if the indulgentness occurs the intercession does not occur. sent3: the dwarfing Hinayanism occurs if the historiography happens. sent4: that the retrospective happens is brought about by that the intercession does not occur but the discounting happens. sent5: the dwarfing Hinayanism occurs if that the historiography does not occur but the insubstantialness happens is wrong. sent6: if the interfering fluidram occurs then that not the historiography but the insubstantialness occurs is not correct. sent7: the footstep occurs. sent8: not the checkout but the bathing occurs. sent9: if the interfering fluidram does not occur then that the historiography does not occur but the insubstantialness occurs is false. sent10: the bathe happens. sent11: the escorting manumission is triggered by that the interfering fluidram occurs. sent12: that the retrospective happens yields that the bathing does not occur but the abnormalness occurs. sent13: if the unmindfulness does not occur the sinistralness and the uplifting Sangay happens. sent14: if the feeling does not occur that not the uplifting Sangay but the scalding occurs does not hold. sent15: the debating is triggered by that the checkout does not occur. sent16: the insideness does not occur. sent17: the fact that both the historiography and the insubstantialness happens is not right. sent18: that the dwarfing planchet occurs is right. sent19: if the interfering fluidram does not occur then the fact that the historiography and the insubstantialness happens does not hold. sent20: if the interfering fluidram happens then both the dwarfing Hinayanism and the debating occurs. sent21: the riptide occurs. sent22: the chancing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the interfering fluidram does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the historiography but the insubstantialness occurs is not right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the dwarfing Hinayanism happens.; sent8 -> int3: the checkout does not occur.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the debating happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the dwarfing Hinayanism happens and the debate happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__