the fact that if that the authoress is not a Saracen and it does not moor Adenium is not correct the prodigal does not prop manse is not right.
sent1: that the authoress is not a kind of a Saracen and does moor Adenium is not true. sent2: the prodigal is not immunosuppressive if that the facing is both a tramp and immunosuppressive is not right. sent3: if something is not immunosuppressive then that it does not moor histamine and is not carnal does not hold. sent4: if the authoress does moor Adenium the prodigal is an acquisition. sent5: if something is malicious and/or non-carnal it is malicious. sent6: something is a kind of a Alnus if it is malicious. sent7: if the authoress is not a kind of a Saracen and does not moor Adenium then the fact that the prodigal is a kind of an acquisition hold. sent8: if the fact that the authoress is not a Saracen and does not moor Adenium is not right then the prodigal is a kind of an acquisition. sent9: the facing is not a Alnus if the prodigal is a kind of an acquisition and does prop manse. sent10: something is an acquisition and/or does not prop manse if it is a Alnus. sent11: the prodigal is an acquisition if the fact that the authoress is a Saracen that does not moor Adenium is wrong. sent12: if the fact that the authoress is a kind of a Saracen and does not moor Adenium does not hold then the fact that the prodigal does not prop manse is not false. sent13: if the authoress does moor Adenium then the prodigal does not prop manse. sent14: if the authoress is not a Saracen and does not moor Adenium the prodigal does not prop manse. sent15: if something is an acquisition it is carnal. sent16: the facing does not prop manse. sent17: the authoress is carnal. sent18: the facing is malicious or it is not carnal or both. sent19: something props thiouracil if the fact that it does hold is right. sent20: if either the Mozambican is medieval or it is not autotypic or both it is not medieval. sent21: if the fact that the facing is both not malicious and not an acquisition is not right then the prodigal is carnal. sent22: the authoress is not a Alnus if the fact that the prodigal does not prop manse and does not moor Adenium is not correct. sent23: the Yahi is a Alnus if the authoress is malicious. sent24: the authoress is a Saracen. sent25: the fact that the facing does not moor Adenium and it is not malicious is false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the authoress is not a kind of a Saracen and does not moor Adenium does not hold.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: that the prodigal is an acquisition hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prodigal props manse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the prodigal is an acquisition and props manse.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the facing is not a kind of a Alnus.; sent6 -> int4: that the facing is a Alnus is not false if it is malicious.; sent5 -> int5: if the facing is either malicious or not carnal or both it is malicious.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the facing is malicious.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the facing is a kind of a Alnus.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the prodigal does not prop manse.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the Yahi does not moor Adenium.
sent10 -> int10: that if the Yahi is the Alnus the Yahi is a kind of an acquisition and/or does not prop manse is not wrong.; sent3 -> int11: the fact that the prodigal does not moor histamine and it is non-carnal is wrong if it is not immunosuppressive.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the authoress is not a Saracen and it does not moor Adenium is not correct the prodigal does not prop manse is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the authoress is not a kind of a Saracen and does moor Adenium is not true. sent2: the prodigal is not immunosuppressive if that the facing is both a tramp and immunosuppressive is not right. sent3: if something is not immunosuppressive then that it does not moor histamine and is not carnal does not hold. sent4: if the authoress does moor Adenium the prodigal is an acquisition. sent5: if something is malicious and/or non-carnal it is malicious. sent6: something is a kind of a Alnus if it is malicious. sent7: if the authoress is not a kind of a Saracen and does not moor Adenium then the fact that the prodigal is a kind of an acquisition hold. sent8: if the fact that the authoress is not a Saracen and does not moor Adenium is not right then the prodigal is a kind of an acquisition. sent9: the facing is not a Alnus if the prodigal is a kind of an acquisition and does prop manse. sent10: something is an acquisition and/or does not prop manse if it is a Alnus. sent11: the prodigal is an acquisition if the fact that the authoress is a Saracen that does not moor Adenium is wrong. sent12: if the fact that the authoress is a kind of a Saracen and does not moor Adenium does not hold then the fact that the prodigal does not prop manse is not false. sent13: if the authoress does moor Adenium then the prodigal does not prop manse. sent14: if the authoress is not a Saracen and does not moor Adenium the prodigal does not prop manse. sent15: if something is an acquisition it is carnal. sent16: the facing does not prop manse. sent17: the authoress is carnal. sent18: the facing is malicious or it is not carnal or both. sent19: something props thiouracil if the fact that it does hold is right. sent20: if either the Mozambican is medieval or it is not autotypic or both it is not medieval. sent21: if the fact that the facing is both not malicious and not an acquisition is not right then the prodigal is carnal. sent22: the authoress is not a Alnus if the fact that the prodigal does not prop manse and does not moor Adenium is not correct. sent23: the Yahi is a Alnus if the authoress is malicious. sent24: the authoress is a Saracen. sent25: the fact that the facing does not moor Adenium and it is not malicious is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the authoress is not a kind of a Saracen and does not moor Adenium does not hold.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: that the prodigal is an acquisition hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prodigal props manse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the prodigal is an acquisition and props manse.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the facing is not a kind of a Alnus.; sent6 -> int4: that the facing is a Alnus is not false if it is malicious.; sent5 -> int5: if the facing is either malicious or not carnal or both it is malicious.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the facing is malicious.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the facing is a kind of a Alnus.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the prodigal does not prop manse.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__