both the caulescentness and the infinitivalness happens if the lighting occurs.
sent1: the shining religion happens. sent2: that the reddening nudge does not occur and the law does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the option happens is brought about by that the immediateness does not occur and the stableness does not occur. sent4: if the shining pisiform occurs that both the overstraining and the non-flatsness happens does not hold. sent5: the disappearance does not occur. sent6: the shining pisiform occurs. sent7: the boomerang does not occur if that the glacialness occurs hold. sent8: the lightingness does not occur if the bellow does not occur and the coating Jewbush does not occur. sent9: the shining Delphi occurs. sent10: the overstrain does not occur if that the overstrain but not the flatsness occurs is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the stemlessness does not occur hold if the fact that the bellowing does not occur and the coating Jewbush does not occur does not hold. sent12: if that the stemlessness does not occur and/or the lightingness does not occur is right then the shining Steuben does not occur. sent13: if the overstraining does not occur both the infinitivalness and the imposture happens. sent14: that the coating Milanese occurs and the abscondment does not occur is not true. sent15: that the iconolatry but not the Sunnah occurs is not correct. sent16: the reddening nudge occurs and the meatiness happens if the permutation does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bellow does not occur and the coating Jewbush does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the lighting does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lighting occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the bellow does not occur and the coating Jewbush does not occur is not true.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the stemlessness does not occur.; sent4 & sent6 -> int5: that the overstraining occurs and the flatsness does not occur is not right.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the overstraining does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the infinitivalness occurs and the imposture happens.; int7 -> int8: the infinitivalness occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the stemlessness does not occur but the infinitivalness occurs.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the shining Steuben does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = both the caulescentness and the infinitivalness happens if the lighting occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the shining religion happens. sent2: that the reddening nudge does not occur and the law does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the option happens is brought about by that the immediateness does not occur and the stableness does not occur. sent4: if the shining pisiform occurs that both the overstraining and the non-flatsness happens does not hold. sent5: the disappearance does not occur. sent6: the shining pisiform occurs. sent7: the boomerang does not occur if that the glacialness occurs hold. sent8: the lightingness does not occur if the bellow does not occur and the coating Jewbush does not occur. sent9: the shining Delphi occurs. sent10: the overstrain does not occur if that the overstrain but not the flatsness occurs is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the stemlessness does not occur hold if the fact that the bellowing does not occur and the coating Jewbush does not occur does not hold. sent12: if that the stemlessness does not occur and/or the lightingness does not occur is right then the shining Steuben does not occur. sent13: if the overstraining does not occur both the infinitivalness and the imposture happens. sent14: that the coating Milanese occurs and the abscondment does not occur is not true. sent15: that the iconolatry but not the Sunnah occurs is not correct. sent16: the reddening nudge occurs and the meatiness happens if the permutation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bellow does not occur and the coating Jewbush does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the lighting does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lighting occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the bellow does not occur and the coating Jewbush does not occur is not true.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the stemlessness does not occur.; sent4 & sent6 -> int5: that the overstraining occurs and the flatsness does not occur is not right.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the overstraining does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the infinitivalness occurs and the imposture happens.; int7 -> int8: the infinitivalness occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the stemlessness does not occur but the infinitivalness occurs.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__