that the fact that the thirsting feeding does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the hitching IMF does not occur but the macrobioticsness occurs does not hold is wrong.
sent1: that the intensification does not occur is prevented by the non-siderealness. sent2: if the cleaningness does not occur the metamorphousness happens and the thirsting Sabah occurs. sent3: that the thirsting feeding does not occur is brought about by that the trebling immunoassay happens but the thirsting Sabah does not occur. sent4: the oviparousness occurs and the chairmanship happens if the hypertonicity does not occur. sent5: that the plundering occurs is prevented by that the thirsting Sabah occurs and the cleaningness happens. sent6: the macrobioticsness does not occur. sent7: both the trebling immunoassay and the moorage happens. sent8: the thirsting feeding is prevented by that not the hitching IMF but the macrobioticsness occurs. sent9: the siderealness does not occur if the two-dimensionalness occurs. sent10: the plundering happens and the intensification occurs if the siderealness does not occur. sent11: that the trebling Philemon and the chair occurs is not wrong. sent12: if the intensification does not occur then the thirsting feeding happens and the moorage occurs. sent13: if the fact that the hitching IMF does not occur but the macrobioticsness occurs does not hold the cleaning occurs. sent14: that the two-dimensionalness does not occur and/or the siderealness yields that the intensification does not occur. sent15: the non-two-dimensionalness and/or the siderealness occurs if the oviparousness happens. sent16: the two-dimensionalness occurs. sent17: the hypertonicity does not occur if that both the non-bacteremicness and the hypertonicity occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hitching IMF does not occur but the macrobioticsness happens does not hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the cleaning occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the thirsting Sabah occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the thirsting Sabah and the cleaning happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the plundering does not occur.; sent9 & sent16 -> int4: the siderealness does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: both the plundering and the intensification happens.; int5 -> int6: the plundering occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the thirsting Sabah does not occur hold.; sent7 -> int9: the trebling immunoassay happens.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the trebling immunoassay happens but the thirsting Sabah does not occur.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the thirsting feeding does not occur.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the metamorphousness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the thirsting feeding does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the hitching IMF does not occur but the macrobioticsness occurs does not hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the intensification does not occur is prevented by the non-siderealness. sent2: if the cleaningness does not occur the metamorphousness happens and the thirsting Sabah occurs. sent3: that the thirsting feeding does not occur is brought about by that the trebling immunoassay happens but the thirsting Sabah does not occur. sent4: the oviparousness occurs and the chairmanship happens if the hypertonicity does not occur. sent5: that the plundering occurs is prevented by that the thirsting Sabah occurs and the cleaningness happens. sent6: the macrobioticsness does not occur. sent7: both the trebling immunoassay and the moorage happens. sent8: the thirsting feeding is prevented by that not the hitching IMF but the macrobioticsness occurs. sent9: the siderealness does not occur if the two-dimensionalness occurs. sent10: the plundering happens and the intensification occurs if the siderealness does not occur. sent11: that the trebling Philemon and the chair occurs is not wrong. sent12: if the intensification does not occur then the thirsting feeding happens and the moorage occurs. sent13: if the fact that the hitching IMF does not occur but the macrobioticsness occurs does not hold the cleaning occurs. sent14: that the two-dimensionalness does not occur and/or the siderealness yields that the intensification does not occur. sent15: the non-two-dimensionalness and/or the siderealness occurs if the oviparousness happens. sent16: the two-dimensionalness occurs. sent17: the hypertonicity does not occur if that both the non-bacteremicness and the hypertonicity occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hitching IMF does not occur but the macrobioticsness happens does not hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the cleaning occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the thirsting Sabah occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the thirsting Sabah and the cleaning happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the plundering does not occur.; sent9 & sent16 -> int4: the siderealness does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: both the plundering and the intensification happens.; int5 -> int6: the plundering occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the thirsting Sabah does not occur hold.; sent7 -> int9: the trebling immunoassay happens.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the trebling immunoassay happens but the thirsting Sabah does not occur.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the thirsting feeding does not occur.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__