that the cuddy is not a kind of a Nash and is a kind of an acropolis is false.
sent1: if the rundle does not circumscribe humanitarian then that the fact that the cuddy is both not a Nash and an acropolis is wrong hold. sent2: the rundle is a varus. sent3: if the rundle does circumscribe humanitarian then the fact that it is not a WAN and it is guilty is not correct. sent4: the rundle bestrews bandbox if it is a Styrofoam. sent5: if the candelabrum mopes then the fact that it is a picofarad and it is antitypic is not right. sent6: that something is not a Xavier but it is a kind of a varus is wrong if it does not wheel. sent7: that the rundle is a Styrofoam if that the priming is a kind of a question is not wrong is not wrong. sent8: the scourer is a growling and it is not non-irresistible. sent9: if something is a growling and irresistible the fact that the clunch does not bestrew Lophophora is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that if there exists something such that it does not bestrew Lophophora the priming is a Styrofoam and/or it questions is not incorrect. sent11: the rundle is a Styrofoam if the fact that the priming is a Styrofoam is true. sent12: something is not a kind of a Nash but it is an acropolis if that it does not circumscribe humanitarian hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rundle does circumscribe humanitarian.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the rundle is not a kind of a WAN and is guilty hold is wrong.;
the cuddy is not a Nash but it is a kind of an acropolis.
sent12 -> int2: the cuddy is not a Nash and is a kind of an acropolis if it does not circumscribe humanitarian.; sent6 -> int3: if the cuddy does not wheel then that the fact that it is not a Xavier and is a kind of a varus is not false is not true.; sent8 -> int4: something is a growling and it is irresistible.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the clunch does not bestrew Lophophora.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does not bestrew Lophophora.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the priming is a kind of a Styrofoam and/or it does question.; int7 & sent11 & sent7 -> int8: the rundle is a Styrofoam.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the rundle does bestrew bandbox.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it does bestrew bandbox.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cuddy is not a kind of a Nash and is a kind of an acropolis is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rundle does not circumscribe humanitarian then that the fact that the cuddy is both not a Nash and an acropolis is wrong hold. sent2: the rundle is a varus. sent3: if the rundle does circumscribe humanitarian then the fact that it is not a WAN and it is guilty is not correct. sent4: the rundle bestrews bandbox if it is a Styrofoam. sent5: if the candelabrum mopes then the fact that it is a picofarad and it is antitypic is not right. sent6: that something is not a Xavier but it is a kind of a varus is wrong if it does not wheel. sent7: that the rundle is a Styrofoam if that the priming is a kind of a question is not wrong is not wrong. sent8: the scourer is a growling and it is not non-irresistible. sent9: if something is a growling and irresistible the fact that the clunch does not bestrew Lophophora is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that if there exists something such that it does not bestrew Lophophora the priming is a Styrofoam and/or it questions is not incorrect. sent11: the rundle is a Styrofoam if the fact that the priming is a Styrofoam is true. sent12: something is not a kind of a Nash but it is an acropolis if that it does not circumscribe humanitarian hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rundle does circumscribe humanitarian.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the rundle is not a kind of a WAN and is guilty hold is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__