the paging jonquil occurs.
sent1: that the paging jonquil happens is prevented by that both the indefeasibleness and the overrefining bottle-grass occurs. sent2: the levying occurs. sent3: the congratulating material happens if that the redshift does not occur and the antibioticness does not occur is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the carding does not occur but the levy occurs does not hold the carding happens. sent5: the fact that not the terror but the ceremoniousness occurs is wrong. sent6: the overrefining bottle-grass happens if the pride occurs. sent7: if the congratulating calorimetry and the untheatricalness occurs then the brutality does not occur. sent8: the reactiveness occurs. sent9: that the meridionalness but not the effects occurs is not true. sent10: that not the card but the levying occurs is not right if the indefeasibleness does not occur. sent11: that the jumpstarting does not occur is caused by that both the warpath and the resinlikeness occurs. sent12: that that the indefeasibleness does not occur and the paging jonquil does not occur is not true if the levying happens is not false. sent13: the fact that the priding does not occur and the bimorphemicness does not occur is incorrect. sent14: if that that the pride does not occur and the bimorphemicness does not occur is not incorrect does not hold then the overrefining bottle-grass occurs. sent15: both the indefeasibleness and the levying happens. sent16: the fact that the debarment occurs is correct. sent17: the fact that the pride happens and the bimorphemicness does not occur is incorrect.
sent15 -> int1: the indefeasibleness occurs.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: the overrefining bottle-grass happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the indefeasibleness happens and the overrefining bottle-grass happens.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the card occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the paging jonquil occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the paging jonquil happens is prevented by that both the indefeasibleness and the overrefining bottle-grass occurs. sent2: the levying occurs. sent3: the congratulating material happens if that the redshift does not occur and the antibioticness does not occur is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the carding does not occur but the levy occurs does not hold the carding happens. sent5: the fact that not the terror but the ceremoniousness occurs is wrong. sent6: the overrefining bottle-grass happens if the pride occurs. sent7: if the congratulating calorimetry and the untheatricalness occurs then the brutality does not occur. sent8: the reactiveness occurs. sent9: that the meridionalness but not the effects occurs is not true. sent10: that not the card but the levying occurs is not right if the indefeasibleness does not occur. sent11: that the jumpstarting does not occur is caused by that both the warpath and the resinlikeness occurs. sent12: that that the indefeasibleness does not occur and the paging jonquil does not occur is not true if the levying happens is not false. sent13: the fact that the priding does not occur and the bimorphemicness does not occur is incorrect. sent14: if that that the pride does not occur and the bimorphemicness does not occur is not incorrect does not hold then the overrefining bottle-grass occurs. sent15: both the indefeasibleness and the levying happens. sent16: the fact that the debarment occurs is correct. sent17: the fact that the pride happens and the bimorphemicness does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the indefeasibleness occurs.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: the overrefining bottle-grass happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the indefeasibleness happens and the overrefining bottle-grass happens.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__