the fact that the chinoiserie is both a samarium and a phosphor is not correct.
sent1: if the fact that that the NP is not a kind of a unfeelingness and prolongs does not hold is not wrong the islander is evangelistic. sent2: if something is not a lingual the fact that it is not a unfeelingness and it does not prolong is incorrect. sent3: if an evangelistic thing does prolong then the lift is not a samarium. sent4: the islander is not a kind of a unfeelingness if the NP is not evangelistic. sent5: the NP prolongs and it is lingual. sent6: something is a kind of a samarium that is a phosphor if it is not evangelistic. sent7: if that the NP does not census but it is a kind of a lingual is not right the chinoiserie is not a lingual. sent8: if something that is autosomal does not reunify crinoid the islander is not a kind of a lisinopril. sent9: something does prolong. sent10: the islander is a unfeelingness. sent11: that the chinoiserie is a samarium and it is a phosphor is false if the lift is not a samarium. sent12: something is autosomal but it does not reunify crinoid. sent13: the NP is a lingual.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the NP is not evangelistic.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the islander is not a unfeelingness.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the NP is evangelistic.; sent5 -> int4: that the NP does prolong is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the NP is evangelistic and it prolongs.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is evangelistic and prolongs.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the lift is not a samarium.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the islander is not a kind of a phosphor.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chinoiserie is both a samarium and a phosphor is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that that the NP is not a kind of a unfeelingness and prolongs does not hold is not wrong the islander is evangelistic. sent2: if something is not a lingual the fact that it is not a unfeelingness and it does not prolong is incorrect. sent3: if an evangelistic thing does prolong then the lift is not a samarium. sent4: the islander is not a kind of a unfeelingness if the NP is not evangelistic. sent5: the NP prolongs and it is lingual. sent6: something is a kind of a samarium that is a phosphor if it is not evangelistic. sent7: if that the NP does not census but it is a kind of a lingual is not right the chinoiserie is not a lingual. sent8: if something that is autosomal does not reunify crinoid the islander is not a kind of a lisinopril. sent9: something does prolong. sent10: the islander is a unfeelingness. sent11: that the chinoiserie is a samarium and it is a phosphor is false if the lift is not a samarium. sent12: something is autosomal but it does not reunify crinoid. sent13: the NP is a lingual. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the NP is not evangelistic.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the islander is not a unfeelingness.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the NP is evangelistic.; sent5 -> int4: that the NP does prolong is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the NP is evangelistic and it prolongs.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is evangelistic and prolongs.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the lift is not a samarium.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__