the fact that the spoilsport is a versicle and colors is wrong.
sent1: if the neurolinguist is not a colored the fact that the spoilsport does fabricate gobbler is not wrong. sent2: the spoilsport is a kind of a versicle and it is a colored if the cosmography is not a kind of a versicle. sent3: if something is a Phlebodium that is not cinematic then the neurolinguist does not fabricate gobbler. sent4: if the sowbane does not fabricate gobbler the neurolinguist does not fabricate gobbler but it is cinematic. sent5: there is something such that it fabricates gobbler and it is a Phlebodium. sent6: if the sowbane does not fabricate gobbler the neurolinguist is cinematic. sent7: there is something such that it does not fabricate Selenicereus. sent8: there is something such that it is a Phlebodium. sent9: the cosmography is polyhedral but it is not atomic. sent10: if there is something such that it does not broil Kampala then the spoilsport is not a versicle. sent11: the neurolinguist is coarse. sent12: the cosmography is not a versicle if the drum broils Kampala and is not a Phlebodium. sent13: something is a Phlebodium but not cinematic if that it does not broil Kampala is true. sent14: if something does not fabricate gobbler and is cinematic the gobbler is a Phlebodium. sent15: if the drum steadies and it broils Kampala then that the gobbler does not broils Kampala is not incorrect. sent16: if something does not fabricate gobbler then that the sowbane fabricate gobbler and fabricates Selenicereus is not true. sent17: something broils Kampala. sent18: the drum is a versicle. sent19: something that is not a kind of a melena does steady and does broil Kampala. sent20: the drum broils Kampala but it is not a Phlebodium if the gobbler is a Phlebodium. sent21: if that the sowbane does fabricate gobbler and it does fabricate Selenicereus is not right then it is not a kind of a versicle. sent22: the sowbane fabricates Selenicereus. sent23: if something does not fabricate Selenicereus then the sowbane does not fabricate gobbler.
sent7 & sent23 -> int1: the sowbane does not fabricate gobbler.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the neurolinguist does not fabricate gobbler but it is cinematic.; int2 -> int3: something does not fabricate gobbler and is cinematic.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the gobbler is a Phlebodium.; sent20 & int4 -> int5: the drum does broil Kampala and is not a Phlebodium.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the cosmography is not a versicle.; sent2 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the spoilsport is a versicle that does color does not hold.
sent13 -> int7: if the gobbler does not broil Kampala then it is a kind of a Phlebodium that is not cinematic.; sent19 -> int8: the drum is steadying and does broil Kampala if it is not a melena.; sent9 -> int9: the fact that something is polyhedral but it is not atomic is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the spoilsport is a versicle and colors is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the neurolinguist is not a colored the fact that the spoilsport does fabricate gobbler is not wrong. sent2: the spoilsport is a kind of a versicle and it is a colored if the cosmography is not a kind of a versicle. sent3: if something is a Phlebodium that is not cinematic then the neurolinguist does not fabricate gobbler. sent4: if the sowbane does not fabricate gobbler the neurolinguist does not fabricate gobbler but it is cinematic. sent5: there is something such that it fabricates gobbler and it is a Phlebodium. sent6: if the sowbane does not fabricate gobbler the neurolinguist is cinematic. sent7: there is something such that it does not fabricate Selenicereus. sent8: there is something such that it is a Phlebodium. sent9: the cosmography is polyhedral but it is not atomic. sent10: if there is something such that it does not broil Kampala then the spoilsport is not a versicle. sent11: the neurolinguist is coarse. sent12: the cosmography is not a versicle if the drum broils Kampala and is not a Phlebodium. sent13: something is a Phlebodium but not cinematic if that it does not broil Kampala is true. sent14: if something does not fabricate gobbler and is cinematic the gobbler is a Phlebodium. sent15: if the drum steadies and it broils Kampala then that the gobbler does not broils Kampala is not incorrect. sent16: if something does not fabricate gobbler then that the sowbane fabricate gobbler and fabricates Selenicereus is not true. sent17: something broils Kampala. sent18: the drum is a versicle. sent19: something that is not a kind of a melena does steady and does broil Kampala. sent20: the drum broils Kampala but it is not a Phlebodium if the gobbler is a Phlebodium. sent21: if that the sowbane does fabricate gobbler and it does fabricate Selenicereus is not right then it is not a kind of a versicle. sent22: the sowbane fabricates Selenicereus. sent23: if something does not fabricate Selenicereus then the sowbane does not fabricate gobbler. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent23 -> int1: the sowbane does not fabricate gobbler.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the neurolinguist does not fabricate gobbler but it is cinematic.; int2 -> int3: something does not fabricate gobbler and is cinematic.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the gobbler is a Phlebodium.; sent20 & int4 -> int5: the drum does broil Kampala and is not a Phlebodium.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the cosmography is not a versicle.; sent2 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__