there is something such that if that it is not a brassiere and is transatlantic does not hold then it does not encrimson northerly.
sent1: that something is not a brassiere is not wrong if that it is both truthful and supraorbital is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the aspirator is not transatlantic is right then it does not encrimson northerly. sent3: there exists something such that if it is both not a brassiere and transatlantic it does not encrimson northerly. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a brassiere and it is transatlantic is not true then it does not encrimson northerly. sent5: if the fact that the aspirator bestrews oilstove and is Malian is false then it is not a bathrobe. sent6: if that the aspirator is not a brassiere and is transatlantic does not hold then it does not encrimson northerly. sent7: if the aspirator is both not a serigraphy and untruthful then it is not a kind of a brassiere. sent8: the aspirator is not a kind of a brassiere if the fact that that it pelts and is a Brazilian is correct is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if that the fact that it does not perorate and is configurational is true does not hold then the fact that it is not an optimum is not false. sent10: something is not a brassiere if the fact that it is not rationalist and it does encrimson USAF is not true. sent11: if the cabochon is both not an irradiation and a serigraphy then it does not encrimson northerly.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the aspirator is not a kind of a brassiere if the fact that it is not untruthful and is supraorbital does not hold.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not a brassiere and is transatlantic does not hold then it does not encrimson northerly. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a brassiere is not wrong if that it is both truthful and supraorbital is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the aspirator is not transatlantic is right then it does not encrimson northerly. sent3: there exists something such that if it is both not a brassiere and transatlantic it does not encrimson northerly. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a brassiere and it is transatlantic is not true then it does not encrimson northerly. sent5: if the fact that the aspirator bestrews oilstove and is Malian is false then it is not a bathrobe. sent6: if that the aspirator is not a brassiere and is transatlantic does not hold then it does not encrimson northerly. sent7: if the aspirator is both not a serigraphy and untruthful then it is not a kind of a brassiere. sent8: the aspirator is not a kind of a brassiere if the fact that that it pelts and is a Brazilian is correct is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if that the fact that it does not perorate and is configurational is true does not hold then the fact that it is not an optimum is not false. sent10: something is not a brassiere if the fact that it is not rationalist and it does encrimson USAF is not true. sent11: if the cabochon is both not an irradiation and a serigraphy then it does not encrimson northerly. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__