that the fact that the string is not a kind of a cryptograph and it does not japan Trinidadian is incorrect if the roadway is not anticoagulative is false.
sent1: the roadway is anticoagulative if it is milch and it is not arbitrary. sent2: the plumule is not anticoagulative if it is indistinct. sent3: if the roadway does not japan Trinidadian the string is not a cryptograph and is nonarbitrary. sent4: something does not japan Trinidadian if it is anticoagulative. sent5: if the roadway is not a cryptograph then the fact that the string is not a kind of a cryptograph and does not japan Trinidadian does not hold. sent6: something is not a cryptograph if that that it is milch and is not arbitrary is true is not correct. sent7: the string is not anticoagulative. sent8: the string is not milch and is not a kind of a cryptograph. sent9: the roadway is milch.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the roadway is milch but it is not arbitrary hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the roadway is anticoagulative.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the roadway is not anticoagulative.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the roadway is milch but it is not arbitrary is false.; sent6 -> int4: the roadway is not a cryptograph if the fact that it is milch thing that is not arbitrary is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the roadway is not a cryptograph is correct.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the string is not a kind of a cryptograph and it does not japan Trinidadian is not right.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the string is not a kind of a cryptograph and it does not japan Trinidadian is incorrect if the roadway is not anticoagulative is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the roadway is anticoagulative if it is milch and it is not arbitrary. sent2: the plumule is not anticoagulative if it is indistinct. sent3: if the roadway does not japan Trinidadian the string is not a cryptograph and is nonarbitrary. sent4: something does not japan Trinidadian if it is anticoagulative. sent5: if the roadway is not a cryptograph then the fact that the string is not a kind of a cryptograph and does not japan Trinidadian does not hold. sent6: something is not a cryptograph if that that it is milch and is not arbitrary is true is not correct. sent7: the string is not anticoagulative. sent8: the string is not milch and is not a kind of a cryptograph. sent9: the roadway is milch. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the roadway is milch but it is not arbitrary hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the roadway is anticoagulative.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the roadway is not anticoagulative.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the roadway is milch but it is not arbitrary is false.; sent6 -> int4: the roadway is not a cryptograph if the fact that it is milch thing that is not arbitrary is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the roadway is not a cryptograph is correct.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the string is not a kind of a cryptograph and it does not japan Trinidadian is not right.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__