the fact that the longer does not proposition nearside is not wrong.
sent1: if something does reassail sheepshank then it is compressible but not a Shaw. sent2: if the longer propositions nearside or is a Revere or both the star is non-Episcopal. sent3: the fact that everything is a Revere hold. sent4: the longer is semi-tuberous and/or propositions nearside. sent5: something reassails sheepshank and it is aptitudinal if it does not bolt. sent6: something is semi-tuberous if it is a Revere. sent7: the barrelfish is not Episcopal. sent8: the longer either is Episcopal or propositions nearside or both. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a D-day the hairnet does recuse and it reassails crevice. sent10: the hairnet is not univalve. sent11: the sodalist is a D-day. sent12: the longer does not proposition nearside if the star is Episcopal. sent13: everything is a thyme. sent14: if that the hairnet is not univalve hold then it is a bolt and is a knowledgeability. sent15: either the star propositions nearside or it is semi-tuberous or both. sent16: if the nearside is not Episcopal then that the rendezvous is a Revere but it is not semi-tuberous is incorrect. sent17: the rendezvous is semi-tuberous and is Episcopal if the nearside is not a Shaw. sent18: if the rendezvous is semi-tuberous the longer is a Revere. sent19: the canyonside is semi-tuberous. sent20: the nearside is not Episcopal if the lookout is both compressible and not a Shaw. sent21: if the hairnet reassails crevice and does bolt then the lookout does not bolt. sent22: the longer does not proposition nearside if that the star is semi-tuberous and/or is Episcopal is right.
sent3 -> int1: the star is a kind of a Revere.; sent6 -> int2: the star is semi-tuberous if it is a Revere.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the star is semi-tuberous.; int3 -> int4: the star is semi-tuberous and/or it is Episcopal.; int4 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the longer propositions nearside.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the longer does not proposition nearside is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does reassail sheepshank then it is compressible but not a Shaw. sent2: if the longer propositions nearside or is a Revere or both the star is non-Episcopal. sent3: the fact that everything is a Revere hold. sent4: the longer is semi-tuberous and/or propositions nearside. sent5: something reassails sheepshank and it is aptitudinal if it does not bolt. sent6: something is semi-tuberous if it is a Revere. sent7: the barrelfish is not Episcopal. sent8: the longer either is Episcopal or propositions nearside or both. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a D-day the hairnet does recuse and it reassails crevice. sent10: the hairnet is not univalve. sent11: the sodalist is a D-day. sent12: the longer does not proposition nearside if the star is Episcopal. sent13: everything is a thyme. sent14: if that the hairnet is not univalve hold then it is a bolt and is a knowledgeability. sent15: either the star propositions nearside or it is semi-tuberous or both. sent16: if the nearside is not Episcopal then that the rendezvous is a Revere but it is not semi-tuberous is incorrect. sent17: the rendezvous is semi-tuberous and is Episcopal if the nearside is not a Shaw. sent18: if the rendezvous is semi-tuberous the longer is a Revere. sent19: the canyonside is semi-tuberous. sent20: the nearside is not Episcopal if the lookout is both compressible and not a Shaw. sent21: if the hairnet reassails crevice and does bolt then the lookout does not bolt. sent22: the longer does not proposition nearside if that the star is semi-tuberous and/or is Episcopal is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the star is a kind of a Revere.; sent6 -> int2: the star is semi-tuberous if it is a Revere.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the star is semi-tuberous.; int3 -> int4: the star is semi-tuberous and/or it is Episcopal.; int4 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__