there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an inhalant and it does not flounce is not right.
sent1: the fact that the cottager does not enroll and it is not true is not correct if it swamps blackcock. sent2: there is something such that that it samples twenty-one and is not Rhodesian is not true. sent3: the fact that the cottager does not exalt Glaux and is not a kind of a flounce does not hold if it is intraventricular. sent4: if the cottager enrolls then the fact that it does not exalt Glaux and it does not bother is not right. sent5: the fact that there is something such that it is not a flounce and it does not enroll hold. sent6: that that the cottager is both not an inhalant and a flounce is not correct is not false. sent7: if that the counterfeit is a flounce is not false then the fact that it is a mensch and it is not doric does not hold. sent8: the fact that the cottager is not anthropometric but it is a flounce is wrong. sent9: that that the hushpuppy perceives stenography and does not enroll is not true is right. sent10: if the cottager enrolls then the fact that that it is both not an inhalant and not a flounce is not false is not true. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not enroll and is not a kind of an inhalant is not correct. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does enroll and is not a flounce is not right. sent13: there is something such that it does not enroll and it is not a kind of a flounce. sent14: there is something such that that it reckons and is not a kind of a taw is wrong. sent15: if the fact that the pest does enroll is right the fact that it does not gleam and it does not exalt cleanup is incorrect. sent16: that the cottager is a kind of unthinkable thing that is not megakaryocytic does not hold if it is a kind of a unpalatability. sent17: that something is not a lightheadedness and it does not exalt alternator is false if it is a linguist. sent18: the fact that the cottager is curricular and is not bibliotic is not true. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is not an inhalant and it is a flounce does not hold. sent20: if the cottager enrolls the fact that it is sent thing that does not repaint is incorrect. sent21: the cottager does enroll. sent22: the cottager is a cylinder.
sent10 & sent21 -> int1: that the cottager is non-inhalant thing that is not a flounce does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
that the enlarger is not a lightheadedness and does not exalt alternator is not right if it is a kind of a linguist.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an inhalant and it does not flounce is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cottager does not enroll and it is not true is not correct if it swamps blackcock. sent2: there is something such that that it samples twenty-one and is not Rhodesian is not true. sent3: the fact that the cottager does not exalt Glaux and is not a kind of a flounce does not hold if it is intraventricular. sent4: if the cottager enrolls then the fact that it does not exalt Glaux and it does not bother is not right. sent5: the fact that there is something such that it is not a flounce and it does not enroll hold. sent6: that that the cottager is both not an inhalant and a flounce is not correct is not false. sent7: if that the counterfeit is a flounce is not false then the fact that it is a mensch and it is not doric does not hold. sent8: the fact that the cottager is not anthropometric but it is a flounce is wrong. sent9: that that the hushpuppy perceives stenography and does not enroll is not true is right. sent10: if the cottager enrolls then the fact that that it is both not an inhalant and not a flounce is not false is not true. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not enroll and is not a kind of an inhalant is not correct. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does enroll and is not a flounce is not right. sent13: there is something such that it does not enroll and it is not a kind of a flounce. sent14: there is something such that that it reckons and is not a kind of a taw is wrong. sent15: if the fact that the pest does enroll is right the fact that it does not gleam and it does not exalt cleanup is incorrect. sent16: that the cottager is a kind of unthinkable thing that is not megakaryocytic does not hold if it is a kind of a unpalatability. sent17: that something is not a lightheadedness and it does not exalt alternator is false if it is a linguist. sent18: the fact that the cottager is curricular and is not bibliotic is not true. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is not an inhalant and it is a flounce does not hold. sent20: if the cottager enrolls the fact that it is sent thing that does not repaint is incorrect. sent21: the cottager does enroll. sent22: the cottager is a cylinder. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent21 -> int1: that the cottager is non-inhalant thing that is not a flounce does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__