the ribbing avenue does not occur.
sent1: the ribbing avenue is caused by the non-alarness. sent2: if the alarness happens the fact that the misbehavior occurs is right. sent3: if the cooing PAC does not occur that the misbehavior but not the labor happens is not true. sent4: the fact that the flurry happens and the ribbing arc-boutant does not occur is not right. sent5: the cooing PAC does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the immortalizing appareled does not occur is not false then the sounding happens. sent7: that the laboring does not occur is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the alarness happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the misbehavior happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the misbehavior happens and the labor does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the misbehavior but not the labor occurs does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the alarness does not occur.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the ribbing avenue does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ribbing avenue is caused by the non-alarness. sent2: if the alarness happens the fact that the misbehavior occurs is right. sent3: if the cooing PAC does not occur that the misbehavior but not the labor happens is not true. sent4: the fact that the flurry happens and the ribbing arc-boutant does not occur is not right. sent5: the cooing PAC does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the immortalizing appareled does not occur is not false then the sounding happens. sent7: that the laboring does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the alarness happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the misbehavior happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the misbehavior happens and the labor does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the misbehavior but not the labor occurs does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the alarness does not occur.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__