the stallion is a gouge and is not a saltation.
sent1: the coatrack does not discard sequence. sent2: the sequence is intraventricular but not prejudicial if the goldstone does exacerbate Solanum. sent3: if something is bifilar then it does bludgeon. sent4: the fact that something is a gouge and not a saltation hold if it does bludgeon. sent5: that the goldstone is not prejudicial or it is not intraventricular or both does not hold if the sequence is bifilar. sent6: the ixodid is a Stayman and it discards sequence if the fact that it does not exacerbate Solanum is right. sent7: if the fact that the goldstone is not prejudicial and/or it is not intraventricular is not right the ixodid does not exacerbate Solanum. sent8: if the fact that the coatrack does not discard sequence is not false then the fact that the ixodid is both a hill and a photocell is false. sent9: that the stallion is a gouge that is not a kind of a saltation does not hold if the coatrack does discard sequence. sent10: the sequence is not prejudicial. sent11: if the fact that something is a Stayman is not wrong it does exacerbate Solanum. sent12: The sequence does not discard coatrack. sent13: if the sequence is intraventricular thing that is not prejudicial then the fact that the stallion is bifilar is not wrong. sent14: the coatrack is a kind of a Stayman. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it does hill and is a photocell is incorrect then the goldstone is a Stayman.
sent8 & sent1 -> int1: that the ixodid is a hill and it is a photocell does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it hills and it is a kind of a photocell is not true.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the goldstone is a Stayman.; sent11 -> int4: the goldstone does exacerbate Solanum if it is a Stayman.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the goldstone exacerbates Solanum.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the sequence is not non-intraventricular but it is not prejudicial.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the stallion is bifilar.; sent3 -> int8: the stallion is a bludgeon if it is bifilar.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stallion does bludgeon.; sent4 -> int10: if the stallion is a bludgeon it is a gouge and it is not a kind of a saltation.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that that it is both professorial and a crux is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the stallion is a gouge and is not a saltation. ; $context$ = sent1: the coatrack does not discard sequence. sent2: the sequence is intraventricular but not prejudicial if the goldstone does exacerbate Solanum. sent3: if something is bifilar then it does bludgeon. sent4: the fact that something is a gouge and not a saltation hold if it does bludgeon. sent5: that the goldstone is not prejudicial or it is not intraventricular or both does not hold if the sequence is bifilar. sent6: the ixodid is a Stayman and it discards sequence if the fact that it does not exacerbate Solanum is right. sent7: if the fact that the goldstone is not prejudicial and/or it is not intraventricular is not right the ixodid does not exacerbate Solanum. sent8: if the fact that the coatrack does not discard sequence is not false then the fact that the ixodid is both a hill and a photocell is false. sent9: that the stallion is a gouge that is not a kind of a saltation does not hold if the coatrack does discard sequence. sent10: the sequence is not prejudicial. sent11: if the fact that something is a Stayman is not wrong it does exacerbate Solanum. sent12: The sequence does not discard coatrack. sent13: if the sequence is intraventricular thing that is not prejudicial then the fact that the stallion is bifilar is not wrong. sent14: the coatrack is a kind of a Stayman. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it does hill and is a photocell is incorrect then the goldstone is a Stayman. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent1 -> int1: that the ixodid is a hill and it is a photocell does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it hills and it is a kind of a photocell is not true.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the goldstone is a Stayman.; sent11 -> int4: the goldstone does exacerbate Solanum if it is a Stayman.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the goldstone exacerbates Solanum.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the sequence is not non-intraventricular but it is not prejudicial.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the stallion is bifilar.; sent3 -> int8: the stallion is a bludgeon if it is bifilar.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stallion does bludgeon.; sent4 -> int10: if the stallion is a bludgeon it is a gouge and it is not a kind of a saltation.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__