that the Christmasberry is idiopathic but it does not admeasure Illampu is not incorrect.
sent1: if the bluejacket is not idiopathic the Christmasberry is idiopathic but it does not admeasure Illampu. sent2: the Christmasberry does not admeasure Illampu. sent3: if the bluejacket is not a Decapterus and caucuses osier then it is not idiopathic. sent4: the bluejacket is not a Decapterus and does caucus osier. sent5: if something either is a larghetto or is not a tracked or both then it is a candlepins. sent6: the bluejacket does not admeasure Illampu if the Christmasberry does not caucus osier.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the bluejacket is not idiopathic is not wrong.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Christmasberry is idiopathic and does not admeasure Illampu does not hold.
sent5 -> int2: the fact that the bluejacket is a kind of a candlepins is not false if it is a larghetto and/or it is not a kind of a tracked.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Christmasberry is idiopathic but it does not admeasure Illampu is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bluejacket is not idiopathic the Christmasberry is idiopathic but it does not admeasure Illampu. sent2: the Christmasberry does not admeasure Illampu. sent3: if the bluejacket is not a Decapterus and caucuses osier then it is not idiopathic. sent4: the bluejacket is not a Decapterus and does caucus osier. sent5: if something either is a larghetto or is not a tracked or both then it is a candlepins. sent6: the bluejacket does not admeasure Illampu if the Christmasberry does not caucus osier. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the bluejacket is not idiopathic is not wrong.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__