the extraordinariness happens.
sent1: the extraordinariness happens if the polemics does not occur but the semiautobiographicalness happens. sent2: if not the edutainment but the investigating recognizance happens the polemics does not occur. sent3: if the washup does not occur that not the edutainment but the investigating recognizance happens is not false. sent4: the fact that the radiology does not occur but the eutrophicness happens is wrong if the shriveling happens. sent5: the hesitation occurs and the proration does not occur. sent6: the semiautobiographicalness happens if the fact that the non-semiautobiographicalness and the receivership occurs is false. sent7: the shriveling happens if the hesitation but not the proration happens. sent8: if that not the radiology but the eutrophicness occurs does not hold the slash occurs. sent9: that the non-semiautobiographicalness and the receivership happens is wrong. sent10: the washup does not occur if the slash happens.
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the shriveling happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the radiology does not occur but the eutrophicness happens is incorrect.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the slashing happens is not wrong.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the fact that the washup does not occur is not wrong.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the edutainment does not occur and the investigating recognizance occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the polemics does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int7: the semiautobiographicalness happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the polemics does not occur and the semiautobiographicalness happens.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the extraordinariness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the extraordinariness happens if the polemics does not occur but the semiautobiographicalness happens. sent2: if not the edutainment but the investigating recognizance happens the polemics does not occur. sent3: if the washup does not occur that not the edutainment but the investigating recognizance happens is not false. sent4: the fact that the radiology does not occur but the eutrophicness happens is wrong if the shriveling happens. sent5: the hesitation occurs and the proration does not occur. sent6: the semiautobiographicalness happens if the fact that the non-semiautobiographicalness and the receivership occurs is false. sent7: the shriveling happens if the hesitation but not the proration happens. sent8: if that not the radiology but the eutrophicness occurs does not hold the slash occurs. sent9: that the non-semiautobiographicalness and the receivership happens is wrong. sent10: the washup does not occur if the slash happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the shriveling happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the radiology does not occur but the eutrophicness happens is incorrect.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the slashing happens is not wrong.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the fact that the washup does not occur is not wrong.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the edutainment does not occur and the investigating recognizance occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the polemics does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int7: the semiautobiographicalness happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the polemics does not occur and the semiautobiographicalness happens.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__