the youth-on-age is a kind of a deadhead.
sent1: the retrorocket is a kind of a flank and is a fitting. sent2: if the fact that the bonemeal does understand and twangs is not right then the killdeer does not respect macro. sent3: that something is a kind of a Buddhism and does not understand is wrong if it does not fit. sent4: if there exists something such that it is eager the bonemeal is imperialistic. sent5: the killdeer does not respect macro if the bonemeal is not a kind of a twang. sent6: if the oxime is a Buddhism and/or it understands the retrorocket is not fitting. sent7: the fact that the retrorocket does respect macro and is not a twang is not true if it is not a flank. sent8: if the oxime is a Buddhism then the retrorocket does not fit. sent9: if the killdeer does not respect macro then the youth-on-age is not a kind of a deadhead. sent10: the fact that the bonemeal understands and does twang is wrong if the oxime does not understands. sent11: the oxime is non-fitting if that the retrorocket respects macro and is not a kind of a twang is false. sent12: something is eager. sent13: something does not respect stuffed if it is imperialistic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oxime understands.; assump1 -> int1: that either the oxime is a kind of a Buddhism or it understands or both hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the retrorocket does not fit.; sent1 -> int3: the retrorocket does fit.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the oxime does not understand is not false.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the bonemeal does understand and does twang does not hold.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the killdeer does not respect macro.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the youth-on-age is a kind of a deadhead.
sent3 -> int8: that the oxime is a Buddhism and does not understand is false if it does not fit.; sent13 -> int9: the bonemeal does not respect stuffed if that it is not non-imperialistic is correct.; sent12 & sent4 -> int10: the bonemeal is not non-imperialistic.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the bonemeal does not respect stuffed.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it does not respect stuffed.;
$hypothesis$ = the youth-on-age is a kind of a deadhead. ; $context$ = sent1: the retrorocket is a kind of a flank and is a fitting. sent2: if the fact that the bonemeal does understand and twangs is not right then the killdeer does not respect macro. sent3: that something is a kind of a Buddhism and does not understand is wrong if it does not fit. sent4: if there exists something such that it is eager the bonemeal is imperialistic. sent5: the killdeer does not respect macro if the bonemeal is not a kind of a twang. sent6: if the oxime is a Buddhism and/or it understands the retrorocket is not fitting. sent7: the fact that the retrorocket does respect macro and is not a twang is not true if it is not a flank. sent8: if the oxime is a Buddhism then the retrorocket does not fit. sent9: if the killdeer does not respect macro then the youth-on-age is not a kind of a deadhead. sent10: the fact that the bonemeal understands and does twang is wrong if the oxime does not understands. sent11: the oxime is non-fitting if that the retrorocket respects macro and is not a kind of a twang is false. sent12: something is eager. sent13: something does not respect stuffed if it is imperialistic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oxime understands.; assump1 -> int1: that either the oxime is a kind of a Buddhism or it understands or both hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the retrorocket does not fit.; sent1 -> int3: the retrorocket does fit.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the oxime does not understand is not false.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the bonemeal does understand and does twang does not hold.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the killdeer does not respect macro.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__