the fact that there is something such that if it is a atomism and it is not inculpatory then it does not ice exuberance is not true.
sent1: if something is a atomism that is not inculpatory it does not ice exuberance. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a atomism and is inculpatory is true it does not ice exuberance. sent3: if something that is a atomism is not inculpatory then it does ice exuberance. sent4: if the pothunter is a atomism and it is inculpatory then it does not ice exuberance. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a atomism and it is not inculpatory it does ice exuberance. sent6: if the pothunter is a kind of a atomism that is not inculpatory it does ice exuberance.
sent1 -> int1: the pothunter does not ice exuberance if it is a atomism and not inculpatory.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a atomism and it is not inculpatory then it does not ice exuberance is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a atomism that is not inculpatory it does not ice exuberance. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a atomism and is inculpatory is true it does not ice exuberance. sent3: if something that is a atomism is not inculpatory then it does ice exuberance. sent4: if the pothunter is a atomism and it is inculpatory then it does not ice exuberance. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a atomism and it is not inculpatory it does ice exuberance. sent6: if the pothunter is a kind of a atomism that is not inculpatory it does ice exuberance. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the pothunter does not ice exuberance if it is a atomism and not inculpatory.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__