that the capote does not braid rein and is not a chopped is not incorrect.
sent1: something is not aerobics if it is a twinkle and it is not accommodational. sent2: that if something is aerobics the fact that it is non-accommodational thing that does not twinkle is not true is right. sent3: if the embalmment is not a kind of a chopped the renegade is a twinkle and non-accommodational. sent4: if something is not aerobics that it does not braid rein and is not a chopped does not hold. sent5: the capote is not a chopped. sent6: the embalmment does braid daisybush. sent7: if something is not aerobics then it is not a redundancy and it is not a kind of a vaporization. sent8: if the embalmment is not aerobics then it does not braid daisybush or it braids layout or both. sent9: the fact that the embalmment does not braid daisybush and/or does braid layout does not hold. sent10: if something is aerobics then the fact that it is not accommodational and it does twinkle does not hold. sent11: the embalmment does braid daisybush or braids layout or both. sent12: that the embalmment is not accommodational but it twinkles does not hold. sent13: if the embalmment is aerobics the fact that it is non-accommodational a twinkle is incorrect. sent14: the survival does not braid rein but it is lower-class if the capote does not braid vaporization. sent15: the survival is a chopped if the embalmment does twinkle. sent16: if the survival does chop then the capote is not a chop. sent17: if that the embalmment is both not accommodational and not a twinkle does not hold the survival is a chopped.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the embalmment is not aerobics.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the embalmment does not braid daisybush or braids layout or both.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the embalmment is aerobics.; sent2 -> int4: if the embalmment is aerobics that it is both not accommodational and not a twinkle is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the embalmment is not accommodational and it is not a twinkle is not true.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the survival is a chopped.;
the renegade is not a kind of a redundancy and it is not a vaporization.
sent7 -> int7: the renegade is not a redundancy and it is not a vaporization if it is not aerobics.; sent1 -> int8: the renegade is not aerobics if it is a twinkle and non-accommodational.;
$hypothesis$ = that the capote does not braid rein and is not a chopped is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not aerobics if it is a twinkle and it is not accommodational. sent2: that if something is aerobics the fact that it is non-accommodational thing that does not twinkle is not true is right. sent3: if the embalmment is not a kind of a chopped the renegade is a twinkle and non-accommodational. sent4: if something is not aerobics that it does not braid rein and is not a chopped does not hold. sent5: the capote is not a chopped. sent6: the embalmment does braid daisybush. sent7: if something is not aerobics then it is not a redundancy and it is not a kind of a vaporization. sent8: if the embalmment is not aerobics then it does not braid daisybush or it braids layout or both. sent9: the fact that the embalmment does not braid daisybush and/or does braid layout does not hold. sent10: if something is aerobics then the fact that it is not accommodational and it does twinkle does not hold. sent11: the embalmment does braid daisybush or braids layout or both. sent12: that the embalmment is not accommodational but it twinkles does not hold. sent13: if the embalmment is aerobics the fact that it is non-accommodational a twinkle is incorrect. sent14: the survival does not braid rein but it is lower-class if the capote does not braid vaporization. sent15: the survival is a chopped if the embalmment does twinkle. sent16: if the survival does chop then the capote is not a chop. sent17: if that the embalmment is both not accommodational and not a twinkle does not hold the survival is a chopped. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the embalmment is not aerobics.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the embalmment does not braid daisybush or braids layout or both.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the embalmment is aerobics.; sent2 -> int4: if the embalmment is aerobics that it is both not accommodational and not a twinkle is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the embalmment is not accommodational and it is not a twinkle is not true.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the survival is a chopped.; __UNKNOWN__