there is something such that if that it is not crystalline and it is a Gallus is not true then it is abstemious.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of noncrystalline a Gallus it is abstemious. sent2: if that something is crystalline hold then it is abstemious. sent3: if the nourishment is crystalline it is abstemious. sent4: a noncrystalline thing that is a Gallus is not non-abstemious. sent5: there exists something such that if it is crystalline it is abstemious. sent6: if that something is not a Gallus but postmortem is wrong then it is hydroelectric. sent7: something is abstemious if that it is both not crystalline and a Gallus does not hold. sent8: the nourishment is abstemious if it is not crystalline and it is a kind of a Gallus.
sent7 -> int1: the nourishment is abstemious if the fact that it is noncrystalline and it is a kind of a Gallus does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the nourishment is hydroelectric if the fact that that it is not a Gallus but a postmortem is true is not true.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not crystalline and it is a Gallus is not true then it is abstemious. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of noncrystalline a Gallus it is abstemious. sent2: if that something is crystalline hold then it is abstemious. sent3: if the nourishment is crystalline it is abstemious. sent4: a noncrystalline thing that is a Gallus is not non-abstemious. sent5: there exists something such that if it is crystalline it is abstemious. sent6: if that something is not a Gallus but postmortem is wrong then it is hydroelectric. sent7: something is abstemious if that it is both not crystalline and a Gallus does not hold. sent8: the nourishment is abstemious if it is not crystalline and it is a kind of a Gallus. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the nourishment is abstemious if the fact that it is noncrystalline and it is a kind of a Gallus does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__