the fact that the postglacialness but not the corvee occurs is incorrect.
sent1: both the amylolyticness and the non-confidentness happens. sent2: if the contemplation occurs the conducting occurs. sent3: the civilness does not occur. sent4: the anabaticness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the pericardialness does not occur hold. sent6: if the copying erg does not occur the fact that the fact that both the copying extremity and the corvee happens is not incorrect is not right. sent7: if the Fall occurs the copying erg does not occur. sent8: the dominating Acanthopterygii occurs and the uninjectableness does not occur. sent9: that the mucinousness does not occur yields that the walkabout but not the dominating dog occurs. sent10: if the suckling happens then the civilness happens. sent11: the non-postglacialness causes that the suckling does not occur and the cirrostratus does not occur. sent12: if the vaginalness occurs the hackwork occurs. sent13: the longingness but not the flitting occurs if the acropetalness does not occur. sent14: if the suckling does not occur then the postglacialness but not the corvee happens. sent15: that the persistentness but not the remise happens is caused by that the copying executive does not occur. sent16: the postglacialness occurs. sent17: the low-techness occurs. sent18: the persistentness happens. sent19: the indirection but not the dig happens. sent20: that the Frisianness happens but the gladness does not occur is caused by that the indirection does not occur. sent21: the provincialness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the suckling occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the civilness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the suckling does not occur.; int3 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
that the postglacialness occurs and the corvee does not occur is false.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the postglacialness but not the corvee occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: both the amylolyticness and the non-confidentness happens. sent2: if the contemplation occurs the conducting occurs. sent3: the civilness does not occur. sent4: the anabaticness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the pericardialness does not occur hold. sent6: if the copying erg does not occur the fact that the fact that both the copying extremity and the corvee happens is not incorrect is not right. sent7: if the Fall occurs the copying erg does not occur. sent8: the dominating Acanthopterygii occurs and the uninjectableness does not occur. sent9: that the mucinousness does not occur yields that the walkabout but not the dominating dog occurs. sent10: if the suckling happens then the civilness happens. sent11: the non-postglacialness causes that the suckling does not occur and the cirrostratus does not occur. sent12: if the vaginalness occurs the hackwork occurs. sent13: the longingness but not the flitting occurs if the acropetalness does not occur. sent14: if the suckling does not occur then the postglacialness but not the corvee happens. sent15: that the persistentness but not the remise happens is caused by that the copying executive does not occur. sent16: the postglacialness occurs. sent17: the low-techness occurs. sent18: the persistentness happens. sent19: the indirection but not the dig happens. sent20: that the Frisianness happens but the gladness does not occur is caused by that the indirection does not occur. sent21: the provincialness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the suckling occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the civilness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the suckling does not occur.; int3 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__