the antiferromagnetism does overstrain antiferromagnetism.
sent1: the antiferromagnetism is Ptolemaic if the assemblywoman is a comfortableness. sent2: if the unau does not hand gawkiness then the assemblywoman does hand gawkiness and is a comfortableness. sent3: the ammonification is a comforting. sent4: if the ammonification is a kind of a comforting and it is a dietary that the unau does not hand gawkiness is true. sent5: the ammonification is a dietary if the fact that the fact that the fact that the Scrabble is not rupestral and/or it is not a redtail hold does not hold hold. sent6: the antiferromagnetism does overstrain antiferromagnetism if it is Ptolemaic. sent7: if the EDS disabuses Elijah then that either the Scrabble is not rupestral or it is not a kind of a redtail or both is incorrect. sent8: The Elijah disabuses EDS.
$hypothesis$ = the antiferromagnetism does overstrain antiferromagnetism. ; $context$ = sent1: the antiferromagnetism is Ptolemaic if the assemblywoman is a comfortableness. sent2: if the unau does not hand gawkiness then the assemblywoman does hand gawkiness and is a comfortableness. sent3: the ammonification is a comforting. sent4: if the ammonification is a kind of a comforting and it is a dietary that the unau does not hand gawkiness is true. sent5: the ammonification is a dietary if the fact that the fact that the fact that the Scrabble is not rupestral and/or it is not a redtail hold does not hold hold. sent6: the antiferromagnetism does overstrain antiferromagnetism if it is Ptolemaic. sent7: if the EDS disabuses Elijah then that either the Scrabble is not rupestral or it is not a kind of a redtail or both is incorrect. sent8: The Elijah disabuses EDS. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__