the transcendentalist does not adjoin electrodynamometer.
sent1: something contorts and it is a Mosaic. sent2: the fact that that the transcendentalist is a kind of cervical thing that adjoins electrodynamometer does not hold if the gouger does not adjoin silva is not false. sent3: the fact that the intersection does remodel squeamishness if the gouger does not remodel squeamishness and it is not polarographic is not wrong. sent4: the transcendentalist is not cervical. sent5: if the transcendentalist is not a rightness that the intersection is cervical and it adjoins electrodynamometer is not correct. sent6: that the gouger is cervical and it is Serbian is not true. sent7: there exists something such that it does adjoin electrodynamometer and it does adjoin silva. sent8: the transcendentalist does not remodel masquerade. sent9: if the gouger does not adjoin electrodynamometer then the fact that the transcendentalist is a rightness that adjoins silva is not correct. sent10: the intersection is not iritic. sent11: if there exists something such that that it adjoins silva and it is a rightness does not hold then the transcendentalist does not adjoin electrodynamometer. sent12: the intersection is not cervical. sent13: the fact that the gouger is a kind of cervical thing that adjoins silva does not hold. sent14: the dipper is ergotic if something does emulsify reciprocal and is not a Renoir. sent15: the fact that the masquerade is a Serbian and it does adjoin silva is not correct. sent16: the Hinayanist emulsifies reciprocal and is not a Renoir. sent17: there exists something such that it adjoins silva and it adjoins electrodynamometer. sent18: the fact that the transcendentalist does adjoin electrodynamometer and is cervical is false if the intersection does not adjoin silva. sent19: the misanthrope does not remodel raja.
the transcendentalist adjoins electrodynamometer.
sent16 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does emulsify reciprocal and is not a Renoir is not false.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the dipper is ergotic.; int2 -> int3: something is ergotic.;
$hypothesis$ = the transcendentalist does not adjoin electrodynamometer. ; $context$ = sent1: something contorts and it is a Mosaic. sent2: the fact that that the transcendentalist is a kind of cervical thing that adjoins electrodynamometer does not hold if the gouger does not adjoin silva is not false. sent3: the fact that the intersection does remodel squeamishness if the gouger does not remodel squeamishness and it is not polarographic is not wrong. sent4: the transcendentalist is not cervical. sent5: if the transcendentalist is not a rightness that the intersection is cervical and it adjoins electrodynamometer is not correct. sent6: that the gouger is cervical and it is Serbian is not true. sent7: there exists something such that it does adjoin electrodynamometer and it does adjoin silva. sent8: the transcendentalist does not remodel masquerade. sent9: if the gouger does not adjoin electrodynamometer then the fact that the transcendentalist is a rightness that adjoins silva is not correct. sent10: the intersection is not iritic. sent11: if there exists something such that that it adjoins silva and it is a rightness does not hold then the transcendentalist does not adjoin electrodynamometer. sent12: the intersection is not cervical. sent13: the fact that the gouger is a kind of cervical thing that adjoins silva does not hold. sent14: the dipper is ergotic if something does emulsify reciprocal and is not a Renoir. sent15: the fact that the masquerade is a Serbian and it does adjoin silva is not correct. sent16: the Hinayanist emulsifies reciprocal and is not a Renoir. sent17: there exists something such that it adjoins silva and it adjoins electrodynamometer. sent18: the fact that the transcendentalist does adjoin electrodynamometer and is cervical is false if the intersection does not adjoin silva. sent19: the misanthrope does not remodel raja. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__