that the blacktail is a sonograph but it is not suppurative is wrong.
sent1: if the blower is a coagulant and trochaic the blacktail is not a gasoline. sent2: there is something such that it is viviparous and it is a kind of a hypsometry. sent3: the cruet is not a capuchin if something is both a convertible and a sonograph. sent4: the fact that the backsaw is not a convertible hold if the cruet is not a kind of a capuchin. sent5: that the cruet is a capuchin and it is convertible is false. sent6: the cruet does backstroke if that the blower is a kind of a coagulant but it is not trochaic is not correct. sent7: if something is not a gasoline then the fact that it is a kind of a sonograph and it is not suppurative does not hold. sent8: if the cruet does backstroke the fact that it does not level skipjack and is a capuchin is not correct. sent9: if there exists something such that it is viviparous and it is a hypsometry then the backsaw is a kind of a convertible. sent10: something does backstroke and does level skipjack if it is not a kind of a capuchin. sent11: if the fact that the cruet does not level skipjack but it is a capuchin is not right the backsaw is not a convertible. sent12: the backsaw is a kind of a convertible and is a sonograph if there exists something such that it is suppurative. sent13: the blacktail is not a gasoline if the blower is a coagulant that is not trochaic. sent14: if that something is both a hypsometry and not viviparous hold then it is not nonsuppurative. sent15: if something is not a gasoline the fact that it is both a sonograph and suppurative is wrong. sent16: the fact that the blower is not a backstroke and it does not level skipjack is not right if the cruet is not a kind of a capuchin.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blower is a coagulant but it is not trochaic is wrong.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the cruet is a kind of a backstroke.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the cruet does not level skipjack but it is a capuchin is not correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the backsaw is not a convertible.; sent2 & sent9 -> int4: the backsaw is a convertible.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the blower is a coagulant but it is not trochaic.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the blacktail is not a kind of a gasoline.; sent7 -> int8: that the blacktail is a sonograph that is not suppurative is false if it is not a gasoline.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the macrame is a gasoline.
sent14 -> int9: the blacktail is suppurative if it is a hypsometry and is not viviparous.;
$hypothesis$ = that the blacktail is a sonograph but it is not suppurative is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blower is a coagulant and trochaic the blacktail is not a gasoline. sent2: there is something such that it is viviparous and it is a kind of a hypsometry. sent3: the cruet is not a capuchin if something is both a convertible and a sonograph. sent4: the fact that the backsaw is not a convertible hold if the cruet is not a kind of a capuchin. sent5: that the cruet is a capuchin and it is convertible is false. sent6: the cruet does backstroke if that the blower is a kind of a coagulant but it is not trochaic is not correct. sent7: if something is not a gasoline then the fact that it is a kind of a sonograph and it is not suppurative does not hold. sent8: if the cruet does backstroke the fact that it does not level skipjack and is a capuchin is not correct. sent9: if there exists something such that it is viviparous and it is a hypsometry then the backsaw is a kind of a convertible. sent10: something does backstroke and does level skipjack if it is not a kind of a capuchin. sent11: if the fact that the cruet does not level skipjack but it is a capuchin is not right the backsaw is not a convertible. sent12: the backsaw is a kind of a convertible and is a sonograph if there exists something such that it is suppurative. sent13: the blacktail is not a gasoline if the blower is a coagulant that is not trochaic. sent14: if that something is both a hypsometry and not viviparous hold then it is not nonsuppurative. sent15: if something is not a gasoline the fact that it is both a sonograph and suppurative is wrong. sent16: the fact that the blower is not a backstroke and it does not level skipjack is not right if the cruet is not a kind of a capuchin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blower is a coagulant but it is not trochaic is wrong.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the cruet is a kind of a backstroke.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the cruet does not level skipjack but it is a capuchin is not correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the backsaw is not a convertible.; sent2 & sent9 -> int4: the backsaw is a convertible.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the blower is a coagulant but it is not trochaic.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the blacktail is not a kind of a gasoline.; sent7 -> int8: that the blacktail is a sonograph that is not suppurative is false if it is not a gasoline.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__