the fact that the Parsee is not a dry hold.
sent1: that something does snivel if the fact that the fact that it is not a snivel and is not a kind of a clear is not incorrect is incorrect is not wrong. sent2: if the decorator is non-cystic thing that is a foster-mother then the Hope is not a kind of a post-maturity. sent3: if the fact that something is not clear and is a snivel does not hold it does marble hamstring. sent4: the Parsee is a kind of a dry if something that marbles hamstring is not a post-maturity. sent5: there exists something such that it is not aoristic. sent6: the fact that the psychiatrist is not orthodontic hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-aoristic a centriole. sent7: if something is not orthodontic that it is not a snivel and is not a clear is not true. sent8: if the fact that the decorator is both not aoristic and a centriole is wrong then that it is not orthodontic is not wrong. sent9: if something hoists then it is a kind of a foster-mother. sent10: if the Cimarron is orthodontic then the psychiatrist does not hoist but it is orthodontic. sent11: the decorator is not non-dry. sent12: the psychiatrist dries. sent13: if the Cimarron is a foster-mother the decorator is not cystic but it is a foster-mother. sent14: if the coelacanth is not a kind of a dry but it does snivel the Hope is not an engagement. sent15: something marbles hamstring if it is clear. sent16: the fact that the decorator is cystic and/or marbles hamstring does not hold. sent17: there is something such that it is sublingual. sent18: that the Hope is not a clear but it is a kind of a snivel is not right if the psychiatrist is not orthodontic. sent19: something is non-aoristic a centriole. sent20: if that the Cimarron is not cystic and marbles hamstring is not true the fact that the Parsee is not a post-maturity hold. sent21: if the fact that the decorator is a snivel is true then that the Cimarron is not cystic and does marble hamstring is not true. sent22: the fact that the Parsee is a foster-mother is not wrong if the decorator is a kind of non-cystic thing that is not dry. sent23: the Cimarron is a hoist if the coelacanth is not a kind of a salubrity and it is not an engagement. sent24: the fact that something is both not a foster-mother and a hoist is not correct if it is not a post-maturity. sent25: the fact that everything is not a kind of a salubrity and it is not a kind of an engagement hold.
sent25 -> int1: the coelacanth is not a salubrity and it is not an engagement.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the Cimarron does hoist.; sent9 -> int3: the Cimarron is a foster-mother if it does hoist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Cimarron is a foster-mother.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the decorator is not cystic but it is a foster-mother.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the Hope is not a kind of a post-maturity.; sent3 -> int7: if that the Hope is a kind of unclear a snivel is not correct then it marbles hamstring.; sent19 & sent6 -> int8: the psychiatrist is not orthodontic.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: that the Hope is both not a clear and a snivel is not right.; int7 & int9 -> int10: that the Hope marbles hamstring is correct.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Hope marbles hamstring and is not a post-maturity.; int11 -> int12: something marbles hamstring but it is not a post-maturity.; int12 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the Parsee does not dry.
sent24 -> int13: if that the Parsee is not a kind of a post-maturity is correct the fact that it is not a foster-mother and it is a hoist does not hold.; sent1 -> int14: if that the decorator does not snivel and it is not clear does not hold it snivel.; sent7 -> int15: that the decorator is not a snivel and it is not clear does not hold if it is not orthodontic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Parsee is not a dry hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does snivel if the fact that the fact that it is not a snivel and is not a kind of a clear is not incorrect is incorrect is not wrong. sent2: if the decorator is non-cystic thing that is a foster-mother then the Hope is not a kind of a post-maturity. sent3: if the fact that something is not clear and is a snivel does not hold it does marble hamstring. sent4: the Parsee is a kind of a dry if something that marbles hamstring is not a post-maturity. sent5: there exists something such that it is not aoristic. sent6: the fact that the psychiatrist is not orthodontic hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-aoristic a centriole. sent7: if something is not orthodontic that it is not a snivel and is not a clear is not true. sent8: if the fact that the decorator is both not aoristic and a centriole is wrong then that it is not orthodontic is not wrong. sent9: if something hoists then it is a kind of a foster-mother. sent10: if the Cimarron is orthodontic then the psychiatrist does not hoist but it is orthodontic. sent11: the decorator is not non-dry. sent12: the psychiatrist dries. sent13: if the Cimarron is a foster-mother the decorator is not cystic but it is a foster-mother. sent14: if the coelacanth is not a kind of a dry but it does snivel the Hope is not an engagement. sent15: something marbles hamstring if it is clear. sent16: the fact that the decorator is cystic and/or marbles hamstring does not hold. sent17: there is something such that it is sublingual. sent18: that the Hope is not a clear but it is a kind of a snivel is not right if the psychiatrist is not orthodontic. sent19: something is non-aoristic a centriole. sent20: if that the Cimarron is not cystic and marbles hamstring is not true the fact that the Parsee is not a post-maturity hold. sent21: if the fact that the decorator is a snivel is true then that the Cimarron is not cystic and does marble hamstring is not true. sent22: the fact that the Parsee is a foster-mother is not wrong if the decorator is a kind of non-cystic thing that is not dry. sent23: the Cimarron is a hoist if the coelacanth is not a kind of a salubrity and it is not an engagement. sent24: the fact that something is both not a foster-mother and a hoist is not correct if it is not a post-maturity. sent25: the fact that everything is not a kind of a salubrity and it is not a kind of an engagement hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 -> int1: the coelacanth is not a salubrity and it is not an engagement.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the Cimarron does hoist.; sent9 -> int3: the Cimarron is a foster-mother if it does hoist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Cimarron is a foster-mother.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the decorator is not cystic but it is a foster-mother.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the Hope is not a kind of a post-maturity.; sent3 -> int7: if that the Hope is a kind of unclear a snivel is not correct then it marbles hamstring.; sent19 & sent6 -> int8: the psychiatrist is not orthodontic.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: that the Hope is both not a clear and a snivel is not right.; int7 & int9 -> int10: that the Hope marbles hamstring is correct.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Hope marbles hamstring and is not a post-maturity.; int11 -> int12: something marbles hamstring but it is not a post-maturity.; int12 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__