that there is something such that if it does exclude Ana and is identifiable then it is not astomatal is incorrect.
sent1: if the Mao does exclude Ana and it is semiotic then it is not a twayblade. sent2: if the Galloway does exclude Ana and it is identifiable then it is astomatal. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a notch that is a Austin then it is not a kind of a scrub. sent4: there exists something such that if it does exclude Dianthus and it is not non-main then it is not extralinguistic. sent5: there is something such that if it excludes Ana and it is identifiable it is astomatal. sent6: there is something such that if it lasts and it is an aroma then it is non-purposeful. sent7: the Galloway is not Balzacian if it is astomatal a spongioblast. sent8: if the Galloway prices mailman and is astomatal then the fact that it does not divest is not incorrect. sent9: if the Galloway is identifiable and it is a vasovasostomy it is not a doctor. sent10: an identifiable thing that is a hake does not bottom. sent11: the mangosteen is not bulbar if it is a kind of an eddy that does exclude patriarch. sent12: there is something such that if it does mingle penology and is not restful the fact that it is nonexistent is true. sent13: if the Galloway extends and does exclude Ana it is not a lecithin. sent14: there exists something such that if it is neuropsychiatric and it prices interestedness it does not tarnish dealer. sent15: if the Galloway is both normative and not non-nilpotent it does not tarnish Cornaceae. sent16: if the Galloway does exclude Ana and is identifiable then the fact that it is not astomatal is not incorrect. sent17: the finder is not astomatal if it does mingle deprecation and it does exclude urine. sent18: if that the Galloway is a celebrant and is asyndetic is right then it does not exclude Ana. sent19: if the scheelite is fictional and it does exclude dairying it is not a pleasance. sent20: there exists something such that if it does mingle foliation and it is a Adapa then it is not an unhappiness. sent21: the fact that the Galloway does not mingle bind is not incorrect if it is recreational thing that does exclude Ana.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
the isogamete is not a bottomed if it is identifiable and it is a hake.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does exclude Ana and is identifiable then it is not astomatal is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Mao does exclude Ana and it is semiotic then it is not a twayblade. sent2: if the Galloway does exclude Ana and it is identifiable then it is astomatal. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a notch that is a Austin then it is not a kind of a scrub. sent4: there exists something such that if it does exclude Dianthus and it is not non-main then it is not extralinguistic. sent5: there is something such that if it excludes Ana and it is identifiable it is astomatal. sent6: there is something such that if it lasts and it is an aroma then it is non-purposeful. sent7: the Galloway is not Balzacian if it is astomatal a spongioblast. sent8: if the Galloway prices mailman and is astomatal then the fact that it does not divest is not incorrect. sent9: if the Galloway is identifiable and it is a vasovasostomy it is not a doctor. sent10: an identifiable thing that is a hake does not bottom. sent11: the mangosteen is not bulbar if it is a kind of an eddy that does exclude patriarch. sent12: there is something such that if it does mingle penology and is not restful the fact that it is nonexistent is true. sent13: if the Galloway extends and does exclude Ana it is not a lecithin. sent14: there exists something such that if it is neuropsychiatric and it prices interestedness it does not tarnish dealer. sent15: if the Galloway is both normative and not non-nilpotent it does not tarnish Cornaceae. sent16: if the Galloway does exclude Ana and is identifiable then the fact that it is not astomatal is not incorrect. sent17: the finder is not astomatal if it does mingle deprecation and it does exclude urine. sent18: if that the Galloway is a celebrant and is asyndetic is right then it does not exclude Ana. sent19: if the scheelite is fictional and it does exclude dairying it is not a pleasance. sent20: there exists something such that if it does mingle foliation and it is a Adapa then it is not an unhappiness. sent21: the fact that the Galloway does not mingle bind is not incorrect if it is recreational thing that does exclude Ana. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__