that both the barking hoop and the replacement happens if the deploying does not occur is not right.
sent1: if the ethnocentricness and the raptorialness occurs then the toll-freeness does not occur. sent2: if that the beacon does not occur and the cannibalisticness happens is not correct the enumeration does not occur. sent3: the fact that the barking hoop occurs is true if the dyeing occurs. sent4: if the association does not occur that the beacon does not occur but the cannibalisticness occurs does not hold. sent5: that the volatile does not occur but the association happens is false. sent6: if the deploying occurs then both the barking hoop and the replacement occurs. sent7: both the replacement and the truckling happens. sent8: if the barking zarf does not occur that not the truckling but the replacement occurs is false. sent9: that the straight-arm happens triggers the fact that that the rehashing but not the facilitating attorneyship happens is right. sent10: if the drink occurs the barking zarf does not occur and the exculpatoriness happens. sent11: the barking hoop happens if the fact that not the dyeing but the misdirection occurs is incorrect. sent12: the truckling happens. sent13: the acyclicness occurs and the ethnocentricness happens if the enumeration does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the volatile does not occur and the association occurs is not true then the fact that the association does not occur hold. sent15: that the straight-arm occurs is right. sent16: the raptorialness is caused by that the rehash occurs and the facilitating attorneyship does not occur. sent17: if the toll-freeness does not occur the twining butterfly occurs and the drink happens. sent18: if the deploying does not occur that not the dyeing but the misdirection occurs is not true. sent19: the fact that both the dyeing and the misdirection occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deploying does not occur.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the dyeing but the misdirection happens is not correct.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the barking hoop occurs is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int3: the replacement occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the barking hoop occurs and the replacement occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the barking Pianola does not occur is correct.
sent14 & sent5 -> int5: the association does not occur.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that not the beaconing but the cannibalisticness happens is not correct.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the enumeration does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: both the acyclicness and the ethnocentricness happens.; int8 -> int9: the ethnocentricness happens.; sent9 & sent15 -> int10: the rehashing happens and the facilitating attorneyship does not occur.; sent16 & int10 -> int11: the raptorialness happens.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the ethnocentricness and the raptorialness occurs.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: the toll-freeness does not occur.; sent17 & int13 -> int14: the twining butterfly and the drinking occurs.; int14 -> int15: the drinking occurs.; sent10 & int15 -> int16: the barking zarf does not occur and the exculpatoriness occurs.; int16 -> int17: that the barking zarf happens is incorrect.; sent8 & int17 -> int18: that not the truckling but the replacement occurs is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that both the barking hoop and the replacement happens if the deploying does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ethnocentricness and the raptorialness occurs then the toll-freeness does not occur. sent2: if that the beacon does not occur and the cannibalisticness happens is not correct the enumeration does not occur. sent3: the fact that the barking hoop occurs is true if the dyeing occurs. sent4: if the association does not occur that the beacon does not occur but the cannibalisticness occurs does not hold. sent5: that the volatile does not occur but the association happens is false. sent6: if the deploying occurs then both the barking hoop and the replacement occurs. sent7: both the replacement and the truckling happens. sent8: if the barking zarf does not occur that not the truckling but the replacement occurs is false. sent9: that the straight-arm happens triggers the fact that that the rehashing but not the facilitating attorneyship happens is right. sent10: if the drink occurs the barking zarf does not occur and the exculpatoriness happens. sent11: the barking hoop happens if the fact that not the dyeing but the misdirection occurs is incorrect. sent12: the truckling happens. sent13: the acyclicness occurs and the ethnocentricness happens if the enumeration does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the volatile does not occur and the association occurs is not true then the fact that the association does not occur hold. sent15: that the straight-arm occurs is right. sent16: the raptorialness is caused by that the rehash occurs and the facilitating attorneyship does not occur. sent17: if the toll-freeness does not occur the twining butterfly occurs and the drink happens. sent18: if the deploying does not occur that not the dyeing but the misdirection occurs is not true. sent19: the fact that both the dyeing and the misdirection occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deploying does not occur.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the dyeing but the misdirection happens is not correct.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the barking hoop occurs is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int3: the replacement occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the barking hoop occurs and the replacement occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__