the weeder is stubborn and is non-aphrodisiac.
sent1: if the mayapple is not a traditionalism and it is not cervine then the wildflower does not tame Modigliani. sent2: something is a kind of a traditionalism and it tames Modigliani if it is not cervine. sent3: that the weeder is stubborn and it is an aphrodisiac is not correct. sent4: that the wildflower does not congratulate and/or does tame weeder does not hold if it shrinks killdeer. sent5: the fact that the weeder is stubborn but it is not aphrodisiac is not right. sent6: if that something does tame Modigliani is not wrong it is stubborn and not an aphrodisiac. sent7: the fact that the hawk's-beard is pediatrics thing that is not an aphrodisiac is incorrect.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the weeder is stubborn but it is not an aphrodisiac.
sent6 -> int1: if the weeder tames Modigliani then it is stubborn and it is not aphrodisiac.; sent2 -> int2: the weeder is a traditionalism and tames Modigliani if it is not cervine.;
$hypothesis$ = the weeder is stubborn and is non-aphrodisiac. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mayapple is not a traditionalism and it is not cervine then the wildflower does not tame Modigliani. sent2: something is a kind of a traditionalism and it tames Modigliani if it is not cervine. sent3: that the weeder is stubborn and it is an aphrodisiac is not correct. sent4: that the wildflower does not congratulate and/or does tame weeder does not hold if it shrinks killdeer. sent5: the fact that the weeder is stubborn but it is not aphrodisiac is not right. sent6: if that something does tame Modigliani is not wrong it is stubborn and not an aphrodisiac. sent7: the fact that the hawk's-beard is pediatrics thing that is not an aphrodisiac is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__