the roble does besiege slicing.
sent1: something is not an ax if it does not besiege proprionamide. sent2: there is something such that it is absorbent and it is a kind of a comparative. sent3: if the nonreader is not a possession it does not quell. sent4: if something that is a kind of an absorbent is not a kind of a comparative then the icecap is a kind of an ax. sent5: that something is not an anchorage and is a vociferator is not correct if it does not besiege slicing. sent6: the nonreader is a kind of a southland if the fact that the roble is not a kind of an anchorage but it is a kind of a vociferator does not hold. sent7: the fact that something is an anchorage that is a vociferator is not right if it does not besiege slicing. sent8: if the fact that the nonreader besieges slicing and is a southland is wrong then it is not a possession. sent9: that the sheepdog is a kind of a comparative and it is a kind of a possession is false. sent10: something is not an ax if the fact that it besieges proprionamide and is Cappadocian is not right. sent11: if something is a possession and besieges proprionamide then it is not a southland. sent12: the nonreader is not a kind of an absorbent. sent13: the fact that the nonreader is an anchorage is not wrong. sent14: the sheepdog is an absorbent but it is not a kind of a comparative. sent15: something is a Rhinoptera and it is a dichotomy. sent16: if the nonreader is not a kind of an absorbent the fact that it is not a possession and it is a kind of an ax is not true. sent17: if something is not a congealment it is not a sit-down. sent18: if the nonreader is a possession it does not besiege proprionamide. sent19: that something does not moor Faulkner and is a neomycin is not right if it is not a kind of a urolith. sent20: something is a kind of an absorbent. sent21: there exists something such that that it is non-Cappadocian thing that is a comparative is wrong. sent22: if something is a possession and/or it is a southland then it does not besiege proprionamide. sent23: if there is something such that that it is not a possession and is an ax does not hold then the fact that the sheepdog is a possession hold. sent24: there exists something such that it is not a valved. sent25: if something is a southland it does not besiege slicing.
sent5 -> int1: if the roble does not besiege slicing the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of an anchorage and is a vociferator is right does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roble does not besiege slicing.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the roble is not an anchorage but it is a vociferator is not correct.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the nonreader is a kind of a southland.; int3 -> int4: the nonreader is a kind of a possession and/or is a kind of a southland.; sent22 -> int5: if the nonreader is a possession or is a southland or both it does not besiege proprionamide.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nonreader does not besiege proprionamide.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the icecap is not a kind of the ax if that the icecap does besiege proprionamide and it is Cappadocian is false is correct.; sent14 -> int8: something is absorbent and is not a comparative.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the icecap axes.;
the roble does not besiege slicing.
sent25 -> int10: the fact that the roble does not besiege slicing is right if the fact that it is a southland is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the roble does besiege slicing. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not an ax if it does not besiege proprionamide. sent2: there is something such that it is absorbent and it is a kind of a comparative. sent3: if the nonreader is not a possession it does not quell. sent4: if something that is a kind of an absorbent is not a kind of a comparative then the icecap is a kind of an ax. sent5: that something is not an anchorage and is a vociferator is not correct if it does not besiege slicing. sent6: the nonreader is a kind of a southland if the fact that the roble is not a kind of an anchorage but it is a kind of a vociferator does not hold. sent7: the fact that something is an anchorage that is a vociferator is not right if it does not besiege slicing. sent8: if the fact that the nonreader besieges slicing and is a southland is wrong then it is not a possession. sent9: that the sheepdog is a kind of a comparative and it is a kind of a possession is false. sent10: something is not an ax if the fact that it besieges proprionamide and is Cappadocian is not right. sent11: if something is a possession and besieges proprionamide then it is not a southland. sent12: the nonreader is not a kind of an absorbent. sent13: the fact that the nonreader is an anchorage is not wrong. sent14: the sheepdog is an absorbent but it is not a kind of a comparative. sent15: something is a Rhinoptera and it is a dichotomy. sent16: if the nonreader is not a kind of an absorbent the fact that it is not a possession and it is a kind of an ax is not true. sent17: if something is not a congealment it is not a sit-down. sent18: if the nonreader is a possession it does not besiege proprionamide. sent19: that something does not moor Faulkner and is a neomycin is not right if it is not a kind of a urolith. sent20: something is a kind of an absorbent. sent21: there exists something such that that it is non-Cappadocian thing that is a comparative is wrong. sent22: if something is a possession and/or it is a southland then it does not besiege proprionamide. sent23: if there is something such that that it is not a possession and is an ax does not hold then the fact that the sheepdog is a possession hold. sent24: there exists something such that it is not a valved. sent25: if something is a southland it does not besiege slicing. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the roble does not besiege slicing the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of an anchorage and is a vociferator is right does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roble does not besiege slicing.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the roble is not an anchorage but it is a vociferator is not correct.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the nonreader is a kind of a southland.; int3 -> int4: the nonreader is a kind of a possession and/or is a kind of a southland.; sent22 -> int5: if the nonreader is a possession or is a southland or both it does not besiege proprionamide.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nonreader does not besiege proprionamide.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the icecap is not a kind of the ax if that the icecap does besiege proprionamide and it is Cappadocian is false is correct.; sent14 -> int8: something is absorbent and is not a comparative.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the icecap axes.; __UNKNOWN__