there exists something such that if it does not skim fearfulness it is not a surface and it is client-server.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not skim fearfulness then it is client-server. sent2: there is something such that if it does skim fearfulness then it is both not surface and client-server. sent3: the paralytic is not a kind of a surface but it is client-server if it does not skim fearfulness. sent4: something does not skim fearfulness but it unbars spillage if it does not identify. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not skim fearfulness it is not surface. sent6: if that the paralytic does not skim fearfulness is not incorrect then it is surface and is client-server.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the paralytic does not identify it does not skim fearfulness and unbars spillage.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not skim fearfulness it is not a surface and it is client-server. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not skim fearfulness then it is client-server. sent2: there is something such that if it does skim fearfulness then it is both not surface and client-server. sent3: the paralytic is not a kind of a surface but it is client-server if it does not skim fearfulness. sent4: something does not skim fearfulness but it unbars spillage if it does not identify. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not skim fearfulness it is not surface. sent6: if that the paralytic does not skim fearfulness is not incorrect then it is surface and is client-server. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__