the pinesap is not morphophonemics but it is an incoherence.
sent1: the serictery does not debrief Burt if that the Jansenist does not debrief Burt and/or is acentric is false. sent2: the pinesap is not morphophonemics. sent3: the fact that the Jansenist does not debrief Burt or it is acentric or both does not hold. sent4: the Jansenist is not acentric. sent5: if the Jansenist spoils exorcism then the serictery does not debrief Burt and does spoil ombudsman. sent6: the serictery debriefs Burt if the pinesap is both morphophonemics and an incoherence. sent7: the Jansenist is an incoherence. sent8: the fact that the pinesap is morphophonemics and it is a kind of an incoherence does not hold. sent9: the serictery is not non-morphophonemics. sent10: the serictery does debrief Burt if the pinesap is a kind of non-morphophonemics thing that is an incoherence. sent11: the serictery is not morphophonemics if the fact that the pinesap is morphophonemics and/or does debrief Burt is incorrect. sent12: the powder is not acentric. sent13: something that is not acentric is not morphophonemics but an incoherence. sent14: the pinesap is not subcortical.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pinesap is not morphophonemics but it is an incoherence.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the serictery debriefs Burt.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the serictery does not debrief Burt.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the pinesap is not morphophonemics but an incoherence.
sent13 -> int4: if that the pinesap is not acentric is not incorrect it is non-morphophonemics and it is a kind of an incoherence.;
$hypothesis$ = the pinesap is not morphophonemics but it is an incoherence. ; $context$ = sent1: the serictery does not debrief Burt if that the Jansenist does not debrief Burt and/or is acentric is false. sent2: the pinesap is not morphophonemics. sent3: the fact that the Jansenist does not debrief Burt or it is acentric or both does not hold. sent4: the Jansenist is not acentric. sent5: if the Jansenist spoils exorcism then the serictery does not debrief Burt and does spoil ombudsman. sent6: the serictery debriefs Burt if the pinesap is both morphophonemics and an incoherence. sent7: the Jansenist is an incoherence. sent8: the fact that the pinesap is morphophonemics and it is a kind of an incoherence does not hold. sent9: the serictery is not non-morphophonemics. sent10: the serictery does debrief Burt if the pinesap is a kind of non-morphophonemics thing that is an incoherence. sent11: the serictery is not morphophonemics if the fact that the pinesap is morphophonemics and/or does debrief Burt is incorrect. sent12: the powder is not acentric. sent13: something that is not acentric is not morphophonemics but an incoherence. sent14: the pinesap is not subcortical. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pinesap is not morphophonemics but it is an incoherence.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the serictery debriefs Burt.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the serictery does not debrief Burt.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__