that there is something such that it does not accrete Rastafarianism does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that it accretes Rastafarianism. sent2: that the BVD whisks is true if there exists something such that it is not Pharaonic. sent3: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a prompter and it is Pharaonic does not hold the BVD is a kind of a whisk. sent4: there exists something such that it is a whisk. sent5: the fact that the fact that something is not interlocutory and it does not accrete Rastafarianism hold is not correct if it does accrete forging. sent6: the eulogist does collar Alexandrian. sent7: the eulogist does not accrete forging and does collar Alexandrian. sent8: the understudy is both a whisk and Pharaonic. sent9: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a prompter and it is Pharaonic. sent10: there is something such that it collars Alexandrian. sent11: that the understudy does accrete Rastafarianism hold. sent12: the BVD expires lean-to and it does accrete forging. sent13: the eulogist is not solanaceous. sent14: the fact that if something does not accrete Rastafarianism the copyist is a whisk is true. sent15: if the eulogist does not accrete forging and collars Alexandrian then the BVD collars Alexandrian. sent16: the copyist does not accrete Rastafarianism if something that is a kind of a whisk does collar Alexandrian.
sent9 -> int1: that the understudy is a kind of a prompter and it is Pharaonic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a prompter that is Pharaonic is not right.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the BVD is a kind of a whisk is not incorrect.; sent15 & sent7 -> int4: the BVD collars Alexandrian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the BVD is a whisk and it does collar Alexandrian.; int5 -> int6: something is a kind of a whisk that collars Alexandrian.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the copyist does not accrete Rastafarianism.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the eulogist is not a kind of a whisk.
sent5 -> int8: that the BVD is not interlocutory and does not accrete Rastafarianism is wrong if it accretes forging.; sent12 -> int9: the BVD accretes forging.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the BVD is not interlocutory and it does not accrete Rastafarianism is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that it does not accrete Rastafarianism does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it accretes Rastafarianism. sent2: that the BVD whisks is true if there exists something such that it is not Pharaonic. sent3: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a prompter and it is Pharaonic does not hold the BVD is a kind of a whisk. sent4: there exists something such that it is a whisk. sent5: the fact that the fact that something is not interlocutory and it does not accrete Rastafarianism hold is not correct if it does accrete forging. sent6: the eulogist does collar Alexandrian. sent7: the eulogist does not accrete forging and does collar Alexandrian. sent8: the understudy is both a whisk and Pharaonic. sent9: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a prompter and it is Pharaonic. sent10: there is something such that it collars Alexandrian. sent11: that the understudy does accrete Rastafarianism hold. sent12: the BVD expires lean-to and it does accrete forging. sent13: the eulogist is not solanaceous. sent14: the fact that if something does not accrete Rastafarianism the copyist is a whisk is true. sent15: if the eulogist does not accrete forging and collars Alexandrian then the BVD collars Alexandrian. sent16: the copyist does not accrete Rastafarianism if something that is a kind of a whisk does collar Alexandrian. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the understudy is a kind of a prompter and it is Pharaonic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a prompter that is Pharaonic is not right.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the BVD is a kind of a whisk is not incorrect.; sent15 & sent7 -> int4: the BVD collars Alexandrian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the BVD is a whisk and it does collar Alexandrian.; int5 -> int6: something is a kind of a whisk that collars Alexandrian.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the copyist does not accrete Rastafarianism.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__