the incitement happens and the festooning call-board does not occur if the noninvasiveness occurs.
sent1: if the Puranicness does not occur the incitement but not the festooning call-board happens. sent2: the festooning marking prevents the stylelessness. sent3: that the noninvasiveness does not occur is not wrong if the Puranicness happens. sent4: the festooning call-board does not occur. sent5: the noninvasiveness occurs if the Puranicness happens. sent6: if the cantoning does not occur the ending occurs but the expiatoriness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noninvasiveness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Puranicness occurs.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the noninvasiveness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the Puranicness does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the incitement occurs but the festooning call-board does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the incitement happens and the festooning call-board does not occur if the noninvasiveness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Puranicness does not occur the incitement but not the festooning call-board happens. sent2: the festooning marking prevents the stylelessness. sent3: that the noninvasiveness does not occur is not wrong if the Puranicness happens. sent4: the festooning call-board does not occur. sent5: the noninvasiveness occurs if the Puranicness happens. sent6: if the cantoning does not occur the ending occurs but the expiatoriness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noninvasiveness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Puranicness occurs.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the noninvasiveness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the Puranicness does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the incitement occurs but the festooning call-board does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__