the bedewing cymbal happens.
sent1: the fact that the modalness happens but the bedewing Yukon does not occur is incorrect if the diphthongizing does not occur. sent2: if both the encrusting Opisthocomus and the encrusting Brasov happens then the architecture does not occur. sent3: the readjustment occurs. sent4: that the encrusting Brasov does not occur yields that the bedewing cymbal and the encrusting Opisthocomus happens. sent5: both the readjustment and the corticalness happens. sent6: if the encrusting Opisthocomus does not occur but the corticalness happens the bedewing cymbal does not occur. sent7: the salableness does not occur. sent8: both the encrusting clawfoot and the bedewing pula happens if the salableness does not occur. sent9: the encrusting Brasov occurs. sent10: that both the readjustment and the aplacentalness happens prevents the corticalness. sent11: the architecture occurs. sent12: the diphthongizing does not occur if the encrusting clawfoot happens. sent13: the readjustment happens if the fact that the modalness happens and the bedewing Yukon does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the encrusting Opisthocomus occurs.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the encrusting Opisthocomus and the encrusting Brasov occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the architecture does not occur is not wrong.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the encrusting Opisthocomus does not occur.; sent5 -> int5: the corticalness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the encrusting Opisthocomus does not occur but the corticalness happens.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the bedewing cymbal occurs.
sent8 & sent7 -> int7: the encrusting clawfoot occurs and the bedewing pula occurs.; int7 -> int8: the encrusting clawfoot happens.; sent12 & int8 -> int9: the diphthongizing does not occur.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the modalness happens but the bedewing Yukon does not occur is incorrect.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the readjustment happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the bedewing cymbal happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the modalness happens but the bedewing Yukon does not occur is incorrect if the diphthongizing does not occur. sent2: if both the encrusting Opisthocomus and the encrusting Brasov happens then the architecture does not occur. sent3: the readjustment occurs. sent4: that the encrusting Brasov does not occur yields that the bedewing cymbal and the encrusting Opisthocomus happens. sent5: both the readjustment and the corticalness happens. sent6: if the encrusting Opisthocomus does not occur but the corticalness happens the bedewing cymbal does not occur. sent7: the salableness does not occur. sent8: both the encrusting clawfoot and the bedewing pula happens if the salableness does not occur. sent9: the encrusting Brasov occurs. sent10: that both the readjustment and the aplacentalness happens prevents the corticalness. sent11: the architecture occurs. sent12: the diphthongizing does not occur if the encrusting clawfoot happens. sent13: the readjustment happens if the fact that the modalness happens and the bedewing Yukon does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the encrusting Opisthocomus occurs.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the encrusting Opisthocomus and the encrusting Brasov occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the architecture does not occur is not wrong.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the encrusting Opisthocomus does not occur.; sent5 -> int5: the corticalness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the encrusting Opisthocomus does not occur but the corticalness happens.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__