the coxsackievirus does flock lath.
sent1: if that the bishop is stimulative and does not philander psalmody is incorrect then the stressor is stimulative. sent2: if there exists something such that it cathects Bihar then the coxsackievirus is stimulative. sent3: The fact that the Bihar does cathect spermatophyte is not false. sent4: if that something is not stimulative or does not philander psalmody or both is not right it is not a kind of a grab. sent5: something is a grab if it cathects Bihar. sent6: something that is not a grab flocks lath. sent7: the female does not philander Glenn if the fact that it is a kind of a shy and cathects consuetude is not incorrect. sent8: the coxsackievirus does not flock lath if the stressor does not flock lath and does not cathect Bihar. sent9: if the fact that the coxsackievirus is stimulative and/or it does not philander psalmody is not right it is not a grab. sent10: the shard is not a grab but it is credible if there exists something such that it does not philander Glenn. sent11: if there is something such that it does cathect Bihar the fact that the coxsackievirus is not stimulative and/or does not philander psalmody is not correct. sent12: the female is a kind of shy thing that cathects consuetude. sent13: the fact that the spermatophyte does cathect Bihar is not false.
sent13 -> int1: something does cathect Bihar.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the coxsackievirus either is not stimulative or does not philander psalmody or both is false.; sent4 -> int3: if the fact that the coxsackievirus is not stimulative and/or it does not philander psalmody is wrong the fact that it is not a grab hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the coxsackievirus does not grab.; sent6 -> int5: if the coxsackievirus is not a grab then it does flock lath.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the ziggurat is a kind of a grab.
sent5 -> int6: that if the ziggurat cathects Bihar the ziggurat grabs is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the coxsackievirus does flock lath. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the bishop is stimulative and does not philander psalmody is incorrect then the stressor is stimulative. sent2: if there exists something such that it cathects Bihar then the coxsackievirus is stimulative. sent3: The fact that the Bihar does cathect spermatophyte is not false. sent4: if that something is not stimulative or does not philander psalmody or both is not right it is not a kind of a grab. sent5: something is a grab if it cathects Bihar. sent6: something that is not a grab flocks lath. sent7: the female does not philander Glenn if the fact that it is a kind of a shy and cathects consuetude is not incorrect. sent8: the coxsackievirus does not flock lath if the stressor does not flock lath and does not cathect Bihar. sent9: if the fact that the coxsackievirus is stimulative and/or it does not philander psalmody is not right it is not a grab. sent10: the shard is not a grab but it is credible if there exists something such that it does not philander Glenn. sent11: if there is something such that it does cathect Bihar the fact that the coxsackievirus is not stimulative and/or does not philander psalmody is not correct. sent12: the female is a kind of shy thing that cathects consuetude. sent13: the fact that the spermatophyte does cathect Bihar is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: something does cathect Bihar.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the coxsackievirus either is not stimulative or does not philander psalmody or both is false.; sent4 -> int3: if the fact that the coxsackievirus is not stimulative and/or it does not philander psalmody is wrong the fact that it is not a grab hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the coxsackievirus does not grab.; sent6 -> int5: if the coxsackievirus is not a grab then it does flock lath.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__