the charger is not a kind of an agnostic.
sent1: if the ethosuximide does not overprint misology it is a Colon. sent2: if the particle is equivocal and it is an agnostic then the charger is not an agnostic. sent3: either the charger is phonics or it does not execute or both. sent4: if either something becomes crew or it is non-agnostic or both it is a Colon. sent5: the fact that everything does become crew and/or it does not become Viola is correct. sent6: if the declension is a Colon then the charger is an agnostic. sent7: something is a Colon if it either does become crew or does not become Viola or both.
sent5 -> int1: the declension becomes crew and/or it does not become Viola.; sent7 -> int2: if the declension does become crew or does not become Viola or both then it is a Colon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the declension is a Colon.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the charger is not an agnostic is right.
$hypothesis$ = the charger is not a kind of an agnostic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ethosuximide does not overprint misology it is a Colon. sent2: if the particle is equivocal and it is an agnostic then the charger is not an agnostic. sent3: either the charger is phonics or it does not execute or both. sent4: if either something becomes crew or it is non-agnostic or both it is a Colon. sent5: the fact that everything does become crew and/or it does not become Viola is correct. sent6: if the declension is a Colon then the charger is an agnostic. sent7: something is a Colon if it either does become crew or does not become Viola or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the declension becomes crew and/or it does not become Viola.; sent7 -> int2: if the declension does become crew or does not become Viola or both then it is a Colon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the declension is a Colon.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__