the metacentricness does not occur.
sent1: the metacentricness occurs if the fact that the emptying firmware does not occur and the edutainment does not occur is false. sent2: the metacentricness occurs if the edutainment occurs. sent3: the fact that not the emptying firmware but the edutainment occurs does not hold. sent4: that the metacentricness does not occur and the emptying bungee does not occur is right if the edutainment occurs. sent5: that the Hollywoodness does not occur and the validation does not occur is wrong. sent6: if the alcoholic happens then the beneficiariness happens and the siege does not occur. sent7: that the rarefaction but not the peritonealness occurs does not hold. sent8: that the emptying firmware does not occur and the edutainment does not occur is not correct if the emptying bungee does not occur. sent9: if the emptying bungee occurs then that the beneficiariness but not the siege occurs is incorrect. sent10: that the alcoholicness occurs is not false. sent11: that the beneficiariness occurs is triggered by that the alcoholic happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emptying bungee occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the beneficiary but not the siege happens is incorrect.; sent6 & sent10 -> int2: that the beneficiary happens but the siege does not occur is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the emptying bungee does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the emptying firmware does not occur and the edutainment does not occur does not hold.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
that the rarefaction but not the peritonealness occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the metacentricness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the metacentricness occurs if the fact that the emptying firmware does not occur and the edutainment does not occur is false. sent2: the metacentricness occurs if the edutainment occurs. sent3: the fact that not the emptying firmware but the edutainment occurs does not hold. sent4: that the metacentricness does not occur and the emptying bungee does not occur is right if the edutainment occurs. sent5: that the Hollywoodness does not occur and the validation does not occur is wrong. sent6: if the alcoholic happens then the beneficiariness happens and the siege does not occur. sent7: that the rarefaction but not the peritonealness occurs does not hold. sent8: that the emptying firmware does not occur and the edutainment does not occur is not correct if the emptying bungee does not occur. sent9: if the emptying bungee occurs then that the beneficiariness but not the siege occurs is incorrect. sent10: that the alcoholicness occurs is not false. sent11: that the beneficiariness occurs is triggered by that the alcoholic happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emptying bungee occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the beneficiary but not the siege happens is incorrect.; sent6 & sent10 -> int2: that the beneficiary happens but the siege does not occur is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the emptying bungee does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the emptying firmware does not occur and the edutainment does not occur does not hold.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__