the hydrogel is reversionary but it does not insufflate incrustation.
sent1: everything does not insufflate rebellion. sent2: if the body does reheat prolactin and/or it reheats petrissage then it is not choreographic. sent3: if the body reheats petrissage then the hydrogel does reheats petrissage. sent4: the body insufflates node. sent5: if something is non-large-capitalization then the fact that it does reheat prolactin and it does not insufflate node is not correct. sent6: the faience is not a kind of a Sturnus if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Sturnus and it is a Bam does not hold. sent7: if something does not crush the fact that it is not choreographic is not incorrect. sent8: if something does reheat petrissage and is not choreographic then it does not insufflate incrustation. sent9: the hydrogel is not large-capitalization. sent10: if the body reheats petrissage it is not choreographic. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is not choreographic hold then the fact that the hydrogel is reversionary but it does not insufflate incrustation is wrong. sent12: either something does reheat petrissage or it is a rendezvous or both if it is not weighty. sent13: the fact that the glycoprotein is a kind of a Sturnus that is a kind of a Bam is not correct. sent14: the utensil is not anticoagulative if it is both brassy and not a trespass. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not a Sturnus the body is not weighty. sent16: the utensil is brassy but it is not a trespass if the chrome does not insufflate rebellion. sent17: the body does insufflate node and it reheats prolactin. sent18: something is reversionary if the fact that it reheats prolactin and it does not insufflate node is false. sent19: there are choreographic things. sent20: that the body reheats prolactin but it is not choreographic is false if there are non-reversionary things. sent21: that the fact that the broody is an overcharge and it crushes hold is not correct if the utensil is not anticoagulative. sent22: the hydrogel reheats petrissage if the body rendezvous.
sent17 -> int1: the body does reheat prolactin.; int1 -> int2: the body either does reheat prolactin or does reheat petrissage or both.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the body is not choreographic is right.; int3 -> int4: something is not choreographic.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the hydrogel is reversionary and does not insufflate incrustation.
sent18 -> int5: if the fact that the hydrogel reheats prolactin and does not insufflate node is not true then it is reversionary.; sent5 -> int6: the fact that the hydrogel does reheat prolactin but it does not insufflate node is not true if the fact that it is not large-capitalization is not false.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: that the hydrogel reheats prolactin but it does not insufflate node does not hold.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the hydrogel is reversionary is not false.; sent8 -> int9: the fact that if the fact that the hydrogel reheats petrissage and is not choreographic is correct then the hydrogel does not insufflate incrustation hold.; sent12 -> int10: the body reheats petrissage and/or does rendezvous if it is not weighty.; sent13 -> int11: there is something such that that it is a Sturnus and it is a Bam does not hold.; int11 & sent6 -> int12: the faience is not a kind of a Sturnus.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not a Sturnus.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the body is not weighty.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the body reheats petrissage and/or it does rendezvous.; int15 & sent3 & sent22 -> int16: the hydrogel reheats petrissage.; sent7 -> int17: if the hydrogel is not a crushed it is not choreographic.; sent1 -> int18: the chrome does not insufflate rebellion.; sent16 & int18 -> int19: the utensil is brassy but it is not a trespass.; sent14 & int19 -> int20: the fact that the utensil is not anticoagulative is true.; sent21 & int20 -> int21: the fact that that the broody is an overcharge that is a kind of a crushed hold does not hold.; int21 -> int22: there is something such that that it is a kind of an overcharge and it is a kind of a crushed is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the hydrogel is reversionary but it does not insufflate incrustation. ; $context$ = sent1: everything does not insufflate rebellion. sent2: if the body does reheat prolactin and/or it reheats petrissage then it is not choreographic. sent3: if the body reheats petrissage then the hydrogel does reheats petrissage. sent4: the body insufflates node. sent5: if something is non-large-capitalization then the fact that it does reheat prolactin and it does not insufflate node is not correct. sent6: the faience is not a kind of a Sturnus if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Sturnus and it is a Bam does not hold. sent7: if something does not crush the fact that it is not choreographic is not incorrect. sent8: if something does reheat petrissage and is not choreographic then it does not insufflate incrustation. sent9: the hydrogel is not large-capitalization. sent10: if the body reheats petrissage it is not choreographic. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is not choreographic hold then the fact that the hydrogel is reversionary but it does not insufflate incrustation is wrong. sent12: either something does reheat petrissage or it is a rendezvous or both if it is not weighty. sent13: the fact that the glycoprotein is a kind of a Sturnus that is a kind of a Bam is not correct. sent14: the utensil is not anticoagulative if it is both brassy and not a trespass. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not a Sturnus the body is not weighty. sent16: the utensil is brassy but it is not a trespass if the chrome does not insufflate rebellion. sent17: the body does insufflate node and it reheats prolactin. sent18: something is reversionary if the fact that it reheats prolactin and it does not insufflate node is false. sent19: there are choreographic things. sent20: that the body reheats prolactin but it is not choreographic is false if there are non-reversionary things. sent21: that the fact that the broody is an overcharge and it crushes hold is not correct if the utensil is not anticoagulative. sent22: the hydrogel reheats petrissage if the body rendezvous. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the body does reheat prolactin.; int1 -> int2: the body either does reheat prolactin or does reheat petrissage or both.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the body is not choreographic is right.; int3 -> int4: something is not choreographic.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__