the gynoecium is oleophobic if the accretion is meretricious.
sent1: if the accretion is meretricious the fact that it is blue-collar and is a kind of a postulate does not hold. sent2: the gynoecium is oleophobic if the accretion is a postulate. sent3: that the accretion is a kind of a Goldmark but it is not meretricious does not hold. sent4: the gynoecium is a postulate. sent5: if the accretion does postulate then that it is a kind of meretricious thing that is not oleophobic is not right. sent6: the gynoecium is uninfluential. sent7: the fact that that the accretion is blue-collar and it is a kind of a postulate is not false is false. sent8: if that the accretion is oleophobic but it is not blue-collar is not correct the gynoecium postulates. sent9: if the accretion is not non-oleophobic then that the gynoecium is meretricious hold. sent10: if the accretion is meretricious the fact that it is both blue-collar and not a postulate is false. sent11: the gynoecium does postulate if the accretion is oleophobic. sent12: the gynoecium is not non-meretricious if the accretion is blue-collar. sent13: the fact that the accretion is blue-collar but it is not oleophobic does not hold. sent14: the accretion is oleophobic if the gynoecium is a postulate. sent15: the plier is blue-collar.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accretion is meretricious.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the accretion is both blue-collar and not a postulate is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the gynoecium is oleophobic if the accretion is meretricious. ; $context$ = sent1: if the accretion is meretricious the fact that it is blue-collar and is a kind of a postulate does not hold. sent2: the gynoecium is oleophobic if the accretion is a postulate. sent3: that the accretion is a kind of a Goldmark but it is not meretricious does not hold. sent4: the gynoecium is a postulate. sent5: if the accretion does postulate then that it is a kind of meretricious thing that is not oleophobic is not right. sent6: the gynoecium is uninfluential. sent7: the fact that that the accretion is blue-collar and it is a kind of a postulate is not false is false. sent8: if that the accretion is oleophobic but it is not blue-collar is not correct the gynoecium postulates. sent9: if the accretion is not non-oleophobic then that the gynoecium is meretricious hold. sent10: if the accretion is meretricious the fact that it is both blue-collar and not a postulate is false. sent11: the gynoecium does postulate if the accretion is oleophobic. sent12: the gynoecium is not non-meretricious if the accretion is blue-collar. sent13: the fact that the accretion is blue-collar but it is not oleophobic does not hold. sent14: the accretion is oleophobic if the gynoecium is a postulate. sent15: the plier is blue-collar. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accretion is meretricious.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the accretion is both blue-collar and not a postulate is false.; __UNKNOWN__