that there is something such that if it is not a JDAM then that it does not regenerate and it is not a Min is incorrect is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a hotplate it is both not a cyclooxygenase and not a gunmetal. sent2: the fact that something does not regenerate and it is not a Min is wrong if it is not a kind of a JDAM. sent3: if something is not a JDAM then that it does regenerate and it is not a kind of a Min does not hold. sent4: the Aborigine is not regenerating and it is not a kind of a Min if it is not a kind of a JDAM. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a creeper the fact that it is unapproachable but not a position is not true. sent6: if the hayrack does not regenerate that it does not enfeeble halothane and it is not euphonic is not right. sent7: if the Aborigine is not a JDAM then that it is a kind of non-regenerating a Min is incorrect. sent8: if the Aborigine is not a gravestone then that it does not enfeeble nylons and it is not ambassadorial is not true. sent9: that the Aborigine does regenerate but it is not a kind of a Min is incorrect if it is not a JDAM. sent10: if something is not a tesseract then that it is not a gravestone and does not suffer Chrysochloridae is wrong. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not recycle it is not palpebrate and it is not a tesseract. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not taxonomic is correct the fact that it is not a wrinkled and it is a kind of a beep is not correct. sent13: that something does not suffer Lombardy and is not proactive is wrong if it is not a kind of a wonder. sent14: if the fact that the halothane does befuddle does not hold the fact that it is a kind of non-euphonic thing that is not a JDAM is wrong. sent15: that the vibrator is not a cerebrum and not a drone is false if it is a JDAM. sent16: that something is not a curiosa but it is a kind of a thundershower does not hold if it is not a Etropus. sent17: that if something is not a JDAM then it is both not regenerating and not a Min hold. sent18: if that something is not a Mesoamerican is true then the fact that it does not enfeeble absconder and is a supernumerary is false. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of a JDAM then the fact that it is not regenerating and it is not a Min is wrong.
sent2 -> int1: if the Aborigine is not a JDAM the fact that it is not regenerating and is not a Min is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a JDAM then that it does not regenerate and it is not a Min is incorrect is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a hotplate it is both not a cyclooxygenase and not a gunmetal. sent2: the fact that something does not regenerate and it is not a Min is wrong if it is not a kind of a JDAM. sent3: if something is not a JDAM then that it does regenerate and it is not a kind of a Min does not hold. sent4: the Aborigine is not regenerating and it is not a kind of a Min if it is not a kind of a JDAM. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a creeper the fact that it is unapproachable but not a position is not true. sent6: if the hayrack does not regenerate that it does not enfeeble halothane and it is not euphonic is not right. sent7: if the Aborigine is not a JDAM then that it is a kind of non-regenerating a Min is incorrect. sent8: if the Aborigine is not a gravestone then that it does not enfeeble nylons and it is not ambassadorial is not true. sent9: that the Aborigine does regenerate but it is not a kind of a Min is incorrect if it is not a JDAM. sent10: if something is not a tesseract then that it is not a gravestone and does not suffer Chrysochloridae is wrong. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not recycle it is not palpebrate and it is not a tesseract. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not taxonomic is correct the fact that it is not a wrinkled and it is a kind of a beep is not correct. sent13: that something does not suffer Lombardy and is not proactive is wrong if it is not a kind of a wonder. sent14: if the fact that the halothane does befuddle does not hold the fact that it is a kind of non-euphonic thing that is not a JDAM is wrong. sent15: that the vibrator is not a cerebrum and not a drone is false if it is a JDAM. sent16: that something is not a curiosa but it is a kind of a thundershower does not hold if it is not a Etropus. sent17: that if something is not a JDAM then it is both not regenerating and not a Min hold. sent18: if that something is not a Mesoamerican is true then the fact that it does not enfeeble absconder and is a supernumerary is false. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of a JDAM then the fact that it is not regenerating and it is not a Min is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the Aborigine is not a JDAM the fact that it is not regenerating and is not a Min is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__