that the curdling occurs if the accordantness happens is false.
sent1: if the distinguishableness happens then the curdling happens. sent2: that the distinguishableness does not occur causes the alcoholicness and/or that the accordantness occurs. sent3: the distinguishableness and the HRT happens if the alcoholic does not occur. sent4: the entertainment occurs. sent5: that both the non-parasiticness and the crystallizing bola occurs does not hold if the alcoholic occurs. sent6: the shattering Baltic happens and the IV occurs if the apiarianness does not occur. sent7: if that both the non-parasiticness and the crystallizing bola occurs is wrong then the accordantness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accordantness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the alcoholic happens.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that both the non-parasiticness and the crystallizing bola occurs is wrong.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the accordantness does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the alcoholicness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the distinguishableness and the HRT happens.; int5 -> int6: the distinguishableness happens.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the curdling happens.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Venetianness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the curdling occurs if the accordantness happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the distinguishableness happens then the curdling happens. sent2: that the distinguishableness does not occur causes the alcoholicness and/or that the accordantness occurs. sent3: the distinguishableness and the HRT happens if the alcoholic does not occur. sent4: the entertainment occurs. sent5: that both the non-parasiticness and the crystallizing bola occurs does not hold if the alcoholic occurs. sent6: the shattering Baltic happens and the IV occurs if the apiarianness does not occur. sent7: if that both the non-parasiticness and the crystallizing bola occurs is wrong then the accordantness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accordantness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the alcoholic happens.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that both the non-parasiticness and the crystallizing bola occurs is wrong.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the accordantness does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the alcoholicness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the distinguishableness and the HRT happens.; int5 -> int6: the distinguishableness happens.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the curdling happens.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__