the squash occurs.
sent1: the positionableness does not occur and the croquet does not occur. sent2: both the righting lasso and the unmilitariness happens. sent3: the righting lasso occurs. sent4: that the obstructionism occurs is not incorrect. sent5: if the obstructionism does not occur then that the squashing but not the bronchospasm occurs is not correct. sent6: the strappado happens. sent7: that the cooling happens is prevented by that the non-campanulateness and the non-Martianness happens. sent8: that the bronchospasm does not occur and the subsidization does not occur prevents that the occupationalness occurs. sent9: the neocorticalness does not occur. sent10: that both the non-factorialness and the non-musculoskeletalness happens prevents that the assimilating does not occur. sent11: the shabbiness does not occur. sent12: both the non-doctrinalness and the prohibition happens. sent13: the progressive does not occur and the venesection happens. sent14: if the occupationalness does not occur and the microsurgery does not occur then the squashing occurs. sent15: the microsurgery does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the squashing happens but the bronchospasm does not occur is not true the squashing does not occur. sent17: the righting chondrite happens. sent18: the non-unmilitariness is triggered by that both the bronchospasm and the obstructionism occurs. sent19: if the doctrinalness and the snuffing exit occurs then the judgment does not occur. sent20: the acquiescence occurs. sent21: the appellateness happens. sent22: the righting steamfitter does not occur and the mushrooming does not occur. sent23: the defalcation occurs. sent24: that the strappado happens is correct if the acquiescence happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bronchospasm occurs.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: both the bronchospasm and the obstructionism occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the unmilitariness does not occur.; sent2 -> int3: the unmilitariness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the bronchospasm does not occur hold.;
the squash does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the squash occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the positionableness does not occur and the croquet does not occur. sent2: both the righting lasso and the unmilitariness happens. sent3: the righting lasso occurs. sent4: that the obstructionism occurs is not incorrect. sent5: if the obstructionism does not occur then that the squashing but not the bronchospasm occurs is not correct. sent6: the strappado happens. sent7: that the cooling happens is prevented by that the non-campanulateness and the non-Martianness happens. sent8: that the bronchospasm does not occur and the subsidization does not occur prevents that the occupationalness occurs. sent9: the neocorticalness does not occur. sent10: that both the non-factorialness and the non-musculoskeletalness happens prevents that the assimilating does not occur. sent11: the shabbiness does not occur. sent12: both the non-doctrinalness and the prohibition happens. sent13: the progressive does not occur and the venesection happens. sent14: if the occupationalness does not occur and the microsurgery does not occur then the squashing occurs. sent15: the microsurgery does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the squashing happens but the bronchospasm does not occur is not true the squashing does not occur. sent17: the righting chondrite happens. sent18: the non-unmilitariness is triggered by that both the bronchospasm and the obstructionism occurs. sent19: if the doctrinalness and the snuffing exit occurs then the judgment does not occur. sent20: the acquiescence occurs. sent21: the appellateness happens. sent22: the righting steamfitter does not occur and the mushrooming does not occur. sent23: the defalcation occurs. sent24: that the strappado happens is correct if the acquiescence happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bronchospasm occurs.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: both the bronchospasm and the obstructionism occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the unmilitariness does not occur.; sent2 -> int3: the unmilitariness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the bronchospasm does not occur hold.; __UNKNOWN__