the barker sexes.
sent1: that the levallorphan does not retouch steel and is not olfactory does not hold if it is heartless. sent2: the barker is both dramatics and a sexed if there is something such that that it confabulates is correct. sent3: the levallorphan does confabulate and it attenuates if it is not a bash. sent4: the myope is a kind of a lysogenization that is a kind of a euphuism. sent5: that if something is dramatics that it is not a bash and it does not confabulate is not wrong is correct. sent6: something is dramatics but it does not sex if it does bloat. sent7: something attenuates if it is not a bash. sent8: if something does not sex then it is not a kind of a bash and it does not confabulate. sent9: the Python is not a bash if the myope is not a bash and it does not confabulate. sent10: the fact that the levallorphan is not heartless is not correct. sent11: if the levallorphan is not a kind of a bash then it attenuates. sent12: the levallorphan is not a bash if the myope is a lysogenization and is a euphuism.
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the levallorphan is not a bash.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the levallorphan does confabulate and does attenuate.; int2 -> int3: the levallorphan does confabulate.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it confabulates.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the barker is dramatics and is a kind of a sexed.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that the barker is not a kind of a sexed hold.
sent5 -> int6: the barker is not a bash and it does not confabulate if the fact that it is dramatics is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the barker sexes. ; $context$ = sent1: that the levallorphan does not retouch steel and is not olfactory does not hold if it is heartless. sent2: the barker is both dramatics and a sexed if there is something such that that it confabulates is correct. sent3: the levallorphan does confabulate and it attenuates if it is not a bash. sent4: the myope is a kind of a lysogenization that is a kind of a euphuism. sent5: that if something is dramatics that it is not a bash and it does not confabulate is not wrong is correct. sent6: something is dramatics but it does not sex if it does bloat. sent7: something attenuates if it is not a bash. sent8: if something does not sex then it is not a kind of a bash and it does not confabulate. sent9: the Python is not a bash if the myope is not a bash and it does not confabulate. sent10: the fact that the levallorphan is not heartless is not correct. sent11: if the levallorphan is not a kind of a bash then it attenuates. sent12: the levallorphan is not a bash if the myope is a lysogenization and is a euphuism. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the levallorphan is not a bash.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the levallorphan does confabulate and does attenuate.; int2 -> int3: the levallorphan does confabulate.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it confabulates.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the barker is dramatics and is a kind of a sexed.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__