the fact that the fact that both the non-flowerlessness and the non-bacchanticness occurs hold is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the flowerlessness but not the bacchanticness occurs is incorrect. sent2: the Semiticness occurs. sent3: that the exponentiation occurs is prevented by that the non-alphanumericsness and the non-nonproprietariness happens. sent4: the commutating ginkgo does not occur. sent5: the daylight happens. sent6: that the nonproprietariness does not occur but the mailing happens is triggered by the non-lower-classness. sent7: the obscuring does not occur. sent8: the mail happens. sent9: if either the Semiticness or the Napoleon or both occurs the material does not occur. sent10: the lower-classness does not occur if the fact that the association and the drinkableness occurs is false. sent11: that the nonproprietariness and the exponentiation occurs is brought about by that the trick does not occur. sent12: that the non-flowerlessness and the bacchanticness occurs does not hold. sent13: the mail occurs if that the lower-classness does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: if the reference does not occur then that the rivaling badger does not occur and the cordlessness does not occur is wrong. sent15: both the attendance and the trick happens if the plastering does not occur. sent16: the fact that the commutating Christie and the scleroticness happens does not hold. sent17: that if the exponentiation does not occur then the fact that the flowerlessness does not occur and the bacchanticness does not occur is false is correct. sent18: the plastering does not occur. sent19: the trick happens. sent20: both the floweringness and the non-bacchanticness occurs if the Semitic does not occur. sent21: both the commutating Mendelism and the auctioning occurs if the polychromaticness does not occur. sent22: the material is prevented by the Napoleon. sent23: the lower-classness does not occur if the association does not occur. sent24: the fact that the association happens and the drinkableness occurs is not correct. sent25: that the alphanumericsness happens is prevented by that the immaterialness and the attendance happens. sent26: if the fact that both the non-Semiticness and the Napoleon occurs is not right then the commutating crepe happens. sent27: if the exponentiation does not occur the fact that both the floweringness and the bacchanticness occurs does not hold. sent28: the trick happens if the plastering does not occur. sent29: if the fact that the Napoleon occurs is correct the fact that not the materialness but the Semitic occurs is not correct. sent30: if the fact that the exponentiation does not occur is right the fact that the flowerlessness and the non-bacchanticness occurs is false.
sent2 -> int1: the Semiticness and/or the Napoleon happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the materialness does not occur.; sent15 & sent18 -> int3: the attendance and the trick happens.; int3 -> int4: the attendance happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: not the materialness but the attendance happens.; int5 & sent25 -> int6: the alphanumericsness does not occur.; sent10 & sent24 -> int7: the lower-classness does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: not the nonproprietariness but the mail occurs.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the nonproprietariness does not occur is not wrong.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the alphanumericsness does not occur and the nonproprietariness does not occur.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the exponentiation does not occur.; int11 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the floweringness and the non-bacchanticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that both the non-flowerlessness and the non-bacchanticness occurs hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the flowerlessness but not the bacchanticness occurs is incorrect. sent2: the Semiticness occurs. sent3: that the exponentiation occurs is prevented by that the non-alphanumericsness and the non-nonproprietariness happens. sent4: the commutating ginkgo does not occur. sent5: the daylight happens. sent6: that the nonproprietariness does not occur but the mailing happens is triggered by the non-lower-classness. sent7: the obscuring does not occur. sent8: the mail happens. sent9: if either the Semiticness or the Napoleon or both occurs the material does not occur. sent10: the lower-classness does not occur if the fact that the association and the drinkableness occurs is false. sent11: that the nonproprietariness and the exponentiation occurs is brought about by that the trick does not occur. sent12: that the non-flowerlessness and the bacchanticness occurs does not hold. sent13: the mail occurs if that the lower-classness does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: if the reference does not occur then that the rivaling badger does not occur and the cordlessness does not occur is wrong. sent15: both the attendance and the trick happens if the plastering does not occur. sent16: the fact that the commutating Christie and the scleroticness happens does not hold. sent17: that if the exponentiation does not occur then the fact that the flowerlessness does not occur and the bacchanticness does not occur is false is correct. sent18: the plastering does not occur. sent19: the trick happens. sent20: both the floweringness and the non-bacchanticness occurs if the Semitic does not occur. sent21: both the commutating Mendelism and the auctioning occurs if the polychromaticness does not occur. sent22: the material is prevented by the Napoleon. sent23: the lower-classness does not occur if the association does not occur. sent24: the fact that the association happens and the drinkableness occurs is not correct. sent25: that the alphanumericsness happens is prevented by that the immaterialness and the attendance happens. sent26: if the fact that both the non-Semiticness and the Napoleon occurs is not right then the commutating crepe happens. sent27: if the exponentiation does not occur the fact that both the floweringness and the bacchanticness occurs does not hold. sent28: the trick happens if the plastering does not occur. sent29: if the fact that the Napoleon occurs is correct the fact that not the materialness but the Semitic occurs is not correct. sent30: if the fact that the exponentiation does not occur is right the fact that the flowerlessness and the non-bacchanticness occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the Semiticness and/or the Napoleon happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the materialness does not occur.; sent15 & sent18 -> int3: the attendance and the trick happens.; int3 -> int4: the attendance happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: not the materialness but the attendance happens.; int5 & sent25 -> int6: the alphanumericsness does not occur.; sent10 & sent24 -> int7: the lower-classness does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: not the nonproprietariness but the mail occurs.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the nonproprietariness does not occur is not wrong.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the alphanumericsness does not occur and the nonproprietariness does not occur.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the exponentiation does not occur.; int11 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__