the monoclonal does not bop Harvey and is a kind of an airdrop.
sent1: something is a kind of a prurigo if it is a ten-spot. sent2: there is something such that it is a prurigo. sent3: if the ventricle is not Pasteurian the fact that the monoclonal does not bop Harvey and is an airdrop does not hold. sent4: the relict does counterplot merit. sent5: the fact that the monoclonal does bop Harvey and is an airdrop is not correct. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a prurigo that is bardic hold that the ventricle is not Pasteurian is right. sent7: if the workshop does cut then the relict is a ten-spot. sent8: everything does not bop Harvey. sent9: the workshop cuts. sent10: the relict counterplots merit and it is bardic. sent11: something is bardic. sent12: if that the workshop is not cut and not a prurigo does not hold the fact that the monoclonal is a ten-spot is not incorrect. sent13: if something is adroit it malingers narcolepsy. sent14: if the fact that the ventricle is not Pasteurian is not incorrect then that the monoclonal bops Harvey and it is an airdrop is not correct.
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the relict is a ten-spot.; sent1 -> int2: if the relict is a ten-spot then the fact that it is a prurigo is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the relict is a kind of a prurigo.; sent10 -> int4: the relict is bardic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the relict is both a prurigo and not non-bardic.; int5 -> int6: something is a prurigo and is bardic.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the ventricle is not Pasteurian.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the monoclonal is a ten-spot.
sent8 -> int8: the relict does not bop Harvey.;
$hypothesis$ = the monoclonal does not bop Harvey and is a kind of an airdrop. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a prurigo if it is a ten-spot. sent2: there is something such that it is a prurigo. sent3: if the ventricle is not Pasteurian the fact that the monoclonal does not bop Harvey and is an airdrop does not hold. sent4: the relict does counterplot merit. sent5: the fact that the monoclonal does bop Harvey and is an airdrop is not correct. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a prurigo that is bardic hold that the ventricle is not Pasteurian is right. sent7: if the workshop does cut then the relict is a ten-spot. sent8: everything does not bop Harvey. sent9: the workshop cuts. sent10: the relict counterplots merit and it is bardic. sent11: something is bardic. sent12: if that the workshop is not cut and not a prurigo does not hold the fact that the monoclonal is a ten-spot is not incorrect. sent13: if something is adroit it malingers narcolepsy. sent14: if the fact that the ventricle is not Pasteurian is not incorrect then that the monoclonal bops Harvey and it is an airdrop is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the relict is a ten-spot.; sent1 -> int2: if the relict is a ten-spot then the fact that it is a prurigo is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the relict is a kind of a prurigo.; sent10 -> int4: the relict is bardic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the relict is both a prurigo and not non-bardic.; int5 -> int6: something is a prurigo and is bardic.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the ventricle is not Pasteurian.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__