that not the concerting but the soft-shoe happens is caused by the non-Marxistness.
sent1: the group does not occur if the eparchialness happens. sent2: if the talkie does not occur then the poulticing groaner does not occur but the meaninglessness happens. sent3: the Chadian occurs. sent4: that the antecubitalness occurs is not false if the patronaging haploidy does not occur. sent5: the ricing and the invasiveness occurs. sent6: if the endoergicness occurs then the patronaging haploidy occurs. sent7: the patronaging haploidy does not occur if the endoergicness happens. sent8: that the Marxistness occurs yields the fact that that the concerting does not occur but the soft-shoe occurs hold. sent9: the soft-shoe does not occur if both the patronaging haploidy and the non-antecubitalness happens. sent10: the non-tragicness and the non-Marxistness happens if that the soft-shoe does not occur hold. sent11: if the concerting happens the Marxistness happens. sent12: either the endoergicness occurs or the poulticing daybook happens or both. sent13: if the exteroceptiveness does not occur then not the refreshment but the carrotiness occurs. sent14: the antecubitalness occurs. sent15: that the patronaging haploidy does not occur leads to that both the antecubitalness and the soft-shoe occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the concerting happens is not false.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the Marxist happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Marxist does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the concert does not occur.;
not the tragicness but the eparchialness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that not the concerting but the soft-shoe happens is caused by the non-Marxistness. ; $context$ = sent1: the group does not occur if the eparchialness happens. sent2: if the talkie does not occur then the poulticing groaner does not occur but the meaninglessness happens. sent3: the Chadian occurs. sent4: that the antecubitalness occurs is not false if the patronaging haploidy does not occur. sent5: the ricing and the invasiveness occurs. sent6: if the endoergicness occurs then the patronaging haploidy occurs. sent7: the patronaging haploidy does not occur if the endoergicness happens. sent8: that the Marxistness occurs yields the fact that that the concerting does not occur but the soft-shoe occurs hold. sent9: the soft-shoe does not occur if both the patronaging haploidy and the non-antecubitalness happens. sent10: the non-tragicness and the non-Marxistness happens if that the soft-shoe does not occur hold. sent11: if the concerting happens the Marxistness happens. sent12: either the endoergicness occurs or the poulticing daybook happens or both. sent13: if the exteroceptiveness does not occur then not the refreshment but the carrotiness occurs. sent14: the antecubitalness occurs. sent15: that the patronaging haploidy does not occur leads to that both the antecubitalness and the soft-shoe occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the concerting happens is not false.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the Marxist happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Marxist does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the concert does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__