the dronabinol is not a kind of a Quapaw.
sent1: that the microtubule is intensive and it is a flatterer is incorrect if the Barber is not a kind of a flatterer. sent2: if the fact that the Barber is not a flatterer and not a Quapaw is incorrect it is not adoptable. sent3: that that the Barber is a bombardment is right if the Bermudan is a kind of a bombardment is not false. sent4: if the Barber is intensive and an express then the dronabinol is not a memoir. sent5: if something is a bombardment then it is intensive. sent6: the hone does express. sent7: the fact that if something is not a kind of a memoir and it is not a flatterer then the microtubule is a kind of a Quapaw is not wrong. sent8: if the fact that something does not jump armorer and it does not jump baldachin is wrong then it does jump armorer. sent9: if something jumps armorer it is an express. sent10: the Bermudan is a bombardment. sent11: if the microtubule does not provide hone the fact that the Barber does not jump armorer and does not jump baldachin is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the dronabinol is not a memoir is not false if the fact that the Bermudan is a memoir and it is intensive is not right. sent13: the dronabinol is not intensive if the microtubule is not a kind of a Quapaw. sent14: if the fact that something does not shelter impiety and it is not adoptable is not right it is not a flatterer. sent15: the Bermudan is a kind of a memoir that expresses. sent16: the fact that the Barber does not shelter impiety and it is not adoptable is incorrect if the dronabinol is a Quapaw. sent17: something is a kind of a Quapaw and is a flatterer if it is not a memoir. sent18: the fact that something is a kind of non-Ionian thing that is not offshore is wrong if it is a Quapaw. sent19: if the fact that the Barber is not a kind of an express and it is not a kind of a flatterer is not correct then the dronabinol is not a flatterer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dronabinol is a Quapaw.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that the Barber does not shelter impiety and is not adoptable is false.; sent14 -> int2: if the fact that that the Barber does not shelter impiety and is not adoptable is wrong is not wrong it is not a flatterer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Barber is not a kind of a flatterer.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the microtubule is intensive a flatterer is not correct.; sent15 -> int5: the Bermudan is a kind of a memoir.;
the dronabinol is a kind of a Quapaw.
sent17 -> int6: the dronabinol is a Quapaw and it is a flatterer if it is not a memoir.; sent5 -> int7: the Barber is intensive if it is a bombardment.; sent3 & sent10 -> int8: the Barber is a bombardment.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Barber is intensive.; sent9 -> int10: if the Barber jumps armorer it is an express.; sent8 -> int11: if that the Barber does not jump armorer and it does not jump baldachin is wrong it jump armorer.;
$hypothesis$ = the dronabinol is not a kind of a Quapaw. ; $context$ = sent1: that the microtubule is intensive and it is a flatterer is incorrect if the Barber is not a kind of a flatterer. sent2: if the fact that the Barber is not a flatterer and not a Quapaw is incorrect it is not adoptable. sent3: that that the Barber is a bombardment is right if the Bermudan is a kind of a bombardment is not false. sent4: if the Barber is intensive and an express then the dronabinol is not a memoir. sent5: if something is a bombardment then it is intensive. sent6: the hone does express. sent7: the fact that if something is not a kind of a memoir and it is not a flatterer then the microtubule is a kind of a Quapaw is not wrong. sent8: if the fact that something does not jump armorer and it does not jump baldachin is wrong then it does jump armorer. sent9: if something jumps armorer it is an express. sent10: the Bermudan is a bombardment. sent11: if the microtubule does not provide hone the fact that the Barber does not jump armorer and does not jump baldachin is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the dronabinol is not a memoir is not false if the fact that the Bermudan is a memoir and it is intensive is not right. sent13: the dronabinol is not intensive if the microtubule is not a kind of a Quapaw. sent14: if the fact that something does not shelter impiety and it is not adoptable is not right it is not a flatterer. sent15: the Bermudan is a kind of a memoir that expresses. sent16: the fact that the Barber does not shelter impiety and it is not adoptable is incorrect if the dronabinol is a Quapaw. sent17: something is a kind of a Quapaw and is a flatterer if it is not a memoir. sent18: the fact that something is a kind of non-Ionian thing that is not offshore is wrong if it is a Quapaw. sent19: if the fact that the Barber is not a kind of an express and it is not a kind of a flatterer is not correct then the dronabinol is not a flatterer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dronabinol is a Quapaw.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that the Barber does not shelter impiety and is not adoptable is false.; sent14 -> int2: if the fact that that the Barber does not shelter impiety and is not adoptable is wrong is not wrong it is not a flatterer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Barber is not a kind of a flatterer.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the microtubule is intensive a flatterer is not correct.; sent15 -> int5: the Bermudan is a kind of a memoir.; __UNKNOWN__