the liquidity manhandles heavy and it is sciatic.
sent1: if something is a kind of a Karelian it does prey. sent2: if the embroideress manhandles introit the fact that the martin is a Karelian is not incorrect. sent3: the martin is sincere and does not prey. sent4: something does manhandle heavy and is sciatic if it does not add leftover. sent5: the martin is not sciatic. sent6: if the liquidity adds leftover the embroideress manhandles introit. sent7: the liquidity is sciatic if that it does add ethnocentrism is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the liquidity adds leftover is not wrong.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the embroideress manhandles introit.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the martin is a Karelian.; sent1 -> int3: if the martin is a kind of a Karelian it is a prey.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the martin is a prey.; sent3 -> int5: the martin does not prey.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the liquidity does not add leftover.; sent4 -> int8: if the liquidity does not add leftover the fact that it manhandles heavy and it is not non-sciatic hold.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the liquidity manhandles heavy and it is sciatic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a Karelian it does prey. sent2: if the embroideress manhandles introit the fact that the martin is a Karelian is not incorrect. sent3: the martin is sincere and does not prey. sent4: something does manhandle heavy and is sciatic if it does not add leftover. sent5: the martin is not sciatic. sent6: if the liquidity adds leftover the embroideress manhandles introit. sent7: the liquidity is sciatic if that it does add ethnocentrism is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the liquidity adds leftover is not wrong.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the embroideress manhandles introit.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the martin is a Karelian.; sent1 -> int3: if the martin is a kind of a Karelian it is a prey.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the martin is a prey.; sent3 -> int5: the martin does not prey.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the liquidity does not add leftover.; sent4 -> int8: if the liquidity does not add leftover the fact that it manhandles heavy and it is not non-sciatic hold.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__