that the W is a kind of non-antisatellite thing that does not sputter Sidney is wrong.
sent1: the tripe is not unobtrusive if the fact that the dent is isotropic and is not unobtrusive does not hold. sent2: if the dent is not unobtrusive that the tripe attests and it is a samekh is false. sent3: the tripe is unobtrusive if the W is a samekh. sent4: that the tripe is both unobtrusive and not isotropic is not true. sent5: if something is not unregenerate then the catarrhine is interplanetary and it is a Icarus. sent6: the W is non-antisatellite if that it is not a samekh is not false. sent7: the W does not attest if there exists something such that the fact that it does attest and is a samekh is not right. sent8: that the W is not antisatellite and does not sputter Sidney does not hold if the tripe is a kind of a samekh. sent9: if the dent is not isotropic then the tripe is not unobtrusive. sent10: the W is not antisatellite. sent11: if there is something such that it is interplanetary that the Libra is a kind of a rational and it sputters barbican is not true. sent12: if the W is not a kind of a samekh then it is not antisatellite and it does not sputter Sidney. sent13: if the dent is not isotropic then the tripe is both a samekh and unobtrusive. sent14: the patentee is docile. sent15: the fact that the dent is isotropic and is not unobtrusive does not hold. sent16: if the W does not sputter Sidney it is not a samekh and is not unobtrusive.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the W is a kind of a samekh.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the tripe is unobtrusive.; sent1 & sent15 -> int2: the tripe is not unobtrusive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the W is not a samekh.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the W does not attest.
$hypothesis$ = that the W is a kind of non-antisatellite thing that does not sputter Sidney is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the tripe is not unobtrusive if the fact that the dent is isotropic and is not unobtrusive does not hold. sent2: if the dent is not unobtrusive that the tripe attests and it is a samekh is false. sent3: the tripe is unobtrusive if the W is a samekh. sent4: that the tripe is both unobtrusive and not isotropic is not true. sent5: if something is not unregenerate then the catarrhine is interplanetary and it is a Icarus. sent6: the W is non-antisatellite if that it is not a samekh is not false. sent7: the W does not attest if there exists something such that the fact that it does attest and is a samekh is not right. sent8: that the W is not antisatellite and does not sputter Sidney does not hold if the tripe is a kind of a samekh. sent9: if the dent is not isotropic then the tripe is not unobtrusive. sent10: the W is not antisatellite. sent11: if there is something such that it is interplanetary that the Libra is a kind of a rational and it sputters barbican is not true. sent12: if the W is not a kind of a samekh then it is not antisatellite and it does not sputter Sidney. sent13: if the dent is not isotropic then the tripe is both a samekh and unobtrusive. sent14: the patentee is docile. sent15: the fact that the dent is isotropic and is not unobtrusive does not hold. sent16: if the W does not sputter Sidney it is not a samekh and is not unobtrusive. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the W is a kind of a samekh.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the tripe is unobtrusive.; sent1 & sent15 -> int2: the tripe is not unobtrusive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the W is not a samekh.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__