the petrissage occurs.
sent1: that the vacating penguin does not occur and the mitoticness does not occur brings about the petrissage. sent2: that the fingering ANS occurs but the classicisticness does not occur prevents that the hypercatalecticness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the moonshining does not occur but the vacating umbel occurs is not correct if the chauvinisticness happens. sent4: if the acceleration does not occur that the curricularness does not occur and the headmistressship does not occur does not hold. sent5: that the non-invertibleness does not occur and the superannuation does not occur is brought about by that the hypercatalecticness happens. sent6: both the fingering ANS and the non-classicisticness occurs if the contestableness occurs. sent7: that the bonding occurs hold if that the chauvinisticness does not occur is true. sent8: the mitoticness does not occur if that either the offshoreness does not occur or the designing does not occur or both is wrong. sent9: the vacating umbel occurs. sent10: if the fact that that the curricularness does not occur and the headmistressship does not occur is not false is incorrect the headmistressship happens. sent11: the moonshining does not occur. sent12: the fact that the offshoreness does not occur or the design does not occur or both is wrong if the fact that the symptomaticness does not occur hold. sent13: the acceleration does not occur if the fact that not the fingering Tanga but the acceleration occurs does not hold. sent14: if the bonding happens the vacating penguin does not occur and the mitoticness does not occur. sent15: the fact that that not the fingering Tanga but the acceleration occurs is not right is not wrong if the non-invertibleness does not occur. sent16: if the petrissage does not occur or the chauvinisticness happens or both then the fact that the petrissage does not occur is correct. sent17: if the bonding does not occur then the petrissage does not occur and/or the chauvinisticness occurs. sent18: the vacating smacker does not occur and the caroling does not occur if the headmistressship happens. sent19: if the vacating smacker does not occur then the symptomaticness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chauvinisticness occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the moonshining does not occur and the vacating umbel happens is false.; sent11 & sent9 -> int2: the moonshine does not occur but the vacating umbel occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the chauvinisticness does not occur hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the bonding occurs.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the vacating penguin does not occur and the mitoticness does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the petrissage does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the petrissage occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the vacating penguin does not occur and the mitoticness does not occur brings about the petrissage. sent2: that the fingering ANS occurs but the classicisticness does not occur prevents that the hypercatalecticness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the moonshining does not occur but the vacating umbel occurs is not correct if the chauvinisticness happens. sent4: if the acceleration does not occur that the curricularness does not occur and the headmistressship does not occur does not hold. sent5: that the non-invertibleness does not occur and the superannuation does not occur is brought about by that the hypercatalecticness happens. sent6: both the fingering ANS and the non-classicisticness occurs if the contestableness occurs. sent7: that the bonding occurs hold if that the chauvinisticness does not occur is true. sent8: the mitoticness does not occur if that either the offshoreness does not occur or the designing does not occur or both is wrong. sent9: the vacating umbel occurs. sent10: if the fact that that the curricularness does not occur and the headmistressship does not occur is not false is incorrect the headmistressship happens. sent11: the moonshining does not occur. sent12: the fact that the offshoreness does not occur or the design does not occur or both is wrong if the fact that the symptomaticness does not occur hold. sent13: the acceleration does not occur if the fact that not the fingering Tanga but the acceleration occurs does not hold. sent14: if the bonding happens the vacating penguin does not occur and the mitoticness does not occur. sent15: the fact that that not the fingering Tanga but the acceleration occurs is not right is not wrong if the non-invertibleness does not occur. sent16: if the petrissage does not occur or the chauvinisticness happens or both then the fact that the petrissage does not occur is correct. sent17: if the bonding does not occur then the petrissage does not occur and/or the chauvinisticness occurs. sent18: the vacating smacker does not occur and the caroling does not occur if the headmistressship happens. sent19: if the vacating smacker does not occur then the symptomaticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chauvinisticness occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the moonshining does not occur and the vacating umbel happens is false.; sent11 & sent9 -> int2: the moonshine does not occur but the vacating umbel occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the chauvinisticness does not occur hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the bonding occurs.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the vacating penguin does not occur and the mitoticness does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__