the fact that the talon is not sepaloid and it is not a Benton does not hold.
sent1: the talon is not a ND. sent2: if a non-clearing thing is incoherent it is not a kind of a Benton. sent3: there is something such that that it does not depress does not hold. sent4: if something does not rival petticoat but it is a polished it is not a people. sent5: the talon is not sepaloid if the greenmarket is not a kind of a Benton. sent6: if something is not a Benton and is not sepaloid it is a stainability. sent7: if the greenmarket is not a Benton the talon is not sepaloid and it is not a Benton. sent8: if the condor is not a nonappearance that it is not sepaloid hold. sent9: that the greenmarket is not a kind of a ND is correct if the condor is incoherent. sent10: if the tailor is not unpardonable then the greenmarket is both not a clearing and incoherent. sent11: the condor is not a kind of a ND and is not a stainability if it is not a kind of a venture. sent12: the greenmarket is not a Philomachus if it is not a clearing. sent13: if that that the condor is not a sheepdog but it is a kind of a venture is wrong is right the talon is a venture. sent14: the talon is not sepaloid but it is a kind of a venture. sent15: the condor is not a kind of a ND. sent16: the greenmarket is not a clearing if the tailor is not unpardonable. sent17: if that something is not a nonappearance and is a Philomachus is not right then it is not a sheepdog. sent18: if that the greenmarket is both not a Philomachus and a Benton is wrong it is not a kind of a stainability. sent19: the tailor is not a sheepdog. sent20: the tailor is a kind of a nonappearance. sent21: if something that is not a ND is not a stainability it is a sheepdog. sent22: if something is both not a Benton and not a Philomachus then that it does venture is true. sent23: that the condor is a kind of a nonappearance and it is a kind of a Philomachus is not true. sent24: if there exists something such that it depresses that the condor is not a nonappearance but it is a Philomachus does not hold. sent25: the tailor is not unpardonable if the condor is a venture. sent26: if the condor commutates element it is not a nonappearance. sent27: a clearing that is incoherent is not a kind of a Benton. sent28: the talon is not a kind of a clearing.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the condor does not venture.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the condor is both not a ND and not a stainability.; sent21 -> int2: if the condor is not a kind of a ND and it is not a kind of a stainability then it is a sheepdog.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the condor is a kind of a sheepdog is true.; sent17 -> int4: the condor is not a sheepdog if that it is both not a nonappearance and a Philomachus does not hold.; sent3 & sent24 -> int5: the fact that the condor is not a nonappearance but it is a Philomachus is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the condor is not a sheepdog.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the condor is a venture.; int8 & sent25 -> int9: the tailor is not unpardonable.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the greenmarket does not clear but it is incoherent.; sent2 -> int11: the greenmarket is not a kind of a Benton if it does not clear and it is incoherent.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the greenmarket is not a Benton.; int12 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the talon is not sepaloid and is not a Benton is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the talon is not sepaloid and it is not a Benton does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the talon is not a ND. sent2: if a non-clearing thing is incoherent it is not a kind of a Benton. sent3: there is something such that that it does not depress does not hold. sent4: if something does not rival petticoat but it is a polished it is not a people. sent5: the talon is not sepaloid if the greenmarket is not a kind of a Benton. sent6: if something is not a Benton and is not sepaloid it is a stainability. sent7: if the greenmarket is not a Benton the talon is not sepaloid and it is not a Benton. sent8: if the condor is not a nonappearance that it is not sepaloid hold. sent9: that the greenmarket is not a kind of a ND is correct if the condor is incoherent. sent10: if the tailor is not unpardonable then the greenmarket is both not a clearing and incoherent. sent11: the condor is not a kind of a ND and is not a stainability if it is not a kind of a venture. sent12: the greenmarket is not a Philomachus if it is not a clearing. sent13: if that that the condor is not a sheepdog but it is a kind of a venture is wrong is right the talon is a venture. sent14: the talon is not sepaloid but it is a kind of a venture. sent15: the condor is not a kind of a ND. sent16: the greenmarket is not a clearing if the tailor is not unpardonable. sent17: if that something is not a nonappearance and is a Philomachus is not right then it is not a sheepdog. sent18: if that the greenmarket is both not a Philomachus and a Benton is wrong it is not a kind of a stainability. sent19: the tailor is not a sheepdog. sent20: the tailor is a kind of a nonappearance. sent21: if something that is not a ND is not a stainability it is a sheepdog. sent22: if something is both not a Benton and not a Philomachus then that it does venture is true. sent23: that the condor is a kind of a nonappearance and it is a kind of a Philomachus is not true. sent24: if there exists something such that it depresses that the condor is not a nonappearance but it is a Philomachus does not hold. sent25: the tailor is not unpardonable if the condor is a venture. sent26: if the condor commutates element it is not a nonappearance. sent27: a clearing that is incoherent is not a kind of a Benton. sent28: the talon is not a kind of a clearing. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the condor does not venture.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the condor is both not a ND and not a stainability.; sent21 -> int2: if the condor is not a kind of a ND and it is not a kind of a stainability then it is a sheepdog.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the condor is a kind of a sheepdog is true.; sent17 -> int4: the condor is not a sheepdog if that it is both not a nonappearance and a Philomachus does not hold.; sent3 & sent24 -> int5: the fact that the condor is not a nonappearance but it is a Philomachus is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the condor is not a sheepdog.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the condor is a venture.; int8 & sent25 -> int9: the tailor is not unpardonable.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the greenmarket does not clear but it is incoherent.; sent2 -> int11: the greenmarket is not a kind of a Benton if it does not clear and it is incoherent.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the greenmarket is not a Benton.; int12 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__