there is something such that it does not sequence stanhope and it is not adsorbable.
sent1: the fact that the incurable is ribless is right if the fact that the gigot is not a strickle but a ctenophore is not true. sent2: the incurable is not an order. sent3: if the gigot does crochet lifeline then the malingerer is not confident and is not a grapnel. sent4: if the malingerer does not crochet lifeline it does not strickle. sent5: the incurable is ribless if the gigot is not a ctenophore. sent6: the Mennonite is not adsorbable. sent7: if that something is both not a strickle and ribless is false then that it is a strickle is correct. sent8: the fact that the gigot is a ctenophore is right if the fact that it is not a ctenophore and it is not an order is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that it does not sequence stanhope and is adsorbable. sent10: there is something such that it is ribless. sent11: the nasal is not adsorbable. sent12: The lifeline does not crochet malingerer. sent13: something does not crochet lifeline. sent14: if there is something such that it is ribless thing that does not order the Mennonite does not sequence stanhope. sent15: the malingerer does not crochet lifeline. sent16: the fact that the gigot is not a kind of a strickle but it is a kind of a ctenophore does not hold if the malingerer is not a strickle.
sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the malingerer is not a kind of a strickle.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the gigot is not a strickle but a ctenophore does not hold.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the incurable is ribless.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the incurable is ribless but it does not order.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is ribless and it is not an order.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the Mennonite does not sequence stanhope.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that the Mennonite does not sequence stanhope and it is not adsorbable hold.; int7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is a kind of non-confident thing that is not a grapnel.
sent7 -> int8: if that the gigot is not a strickle but ribless is incorrect it strickle.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does not sequence stanhope and it is not adsorbable. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the incurable is ribless is right if the fact that the gigot is not a strickle but a ctenophore is not true. sent2: the incurable is not an order. sent3: if the gigot does crochet lifeline then the malingerer is not confident and is not a grapnel. sent4: if the malingerer does not crochet lifeline it does not strickle. sent5: the incurable is ribless if the gigot is not a ctenophore. sent6: the Mennonite is not adsorbable. sent7: if that something is both not a strickle and ribless is false then that it is a strickle is correct. sent8: the fact that the gigot is a ctenophore is right if the fact that it is not a ctenophore and it is not an order is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that it does not sequence stanhope and is adsorbable. sent10: there is something such that it is ribless. sent11: the nasal is not adsorbable. sent12: The lifeline does not crochet malingerer. sent13: something does not crochet lifeline. sent14: if there is something such that it is ribless thing that does not order the Mennonite does not sequence stanhope. sent15: the malingerer does not crochet lifeline. sent16: the fact that the gigot is not a kind of a strickle but it is a kind of a ctenophore does not hold if the malingerer is not a strickle. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the malingerer is not a kind of a strickle.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the gigot is not a strickle but a ctenophore does not hold.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the incurable is ribless.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the incurable is ribless but it does not order.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is ribless and it is not an order.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the Mennonite does not sequence stanhope.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that the Mennonite does not sequence stanhope and it is not adsorbable hold.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__