if the punishment occurs then the fact that the galling anecdotist does not occur and the literariness does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: the Tuscanness does not occur. sent2: that the punishment does not occur is triggered by that the galling anecdotist does not occur but the literariness happens. sent3: the fact that the papalness does not occur and the hairiness does not occur is not true. sent4: the punishment does not occur if the galling anecdotist does not occur and the literariness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the galling anecdotist does not occur and the literariness does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the punishment does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the punishment occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the galling anecdotist does not occur and the literariness does not occur does not hold.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the punishment occurs then the fact that the galling anecdotist does not occur and the literariness does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tuscanness does not occur. sent2: that the punishment does not occur is triggered by that the galling anecdotist does not occur but the literariness happens. sent3: the fact that the papalness does not occur and the hairiness does not occur is not true. sent4: the punishment does not occur if the galling anecdotist does not occur and the literariness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the galling anecdotist does not occur and the literariness does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the punishment does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the punishment occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the galling anecdotist does not occur and the literariness does not occur does not hold.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__