the corsair does not memorialize corner.
sent1: the cornu does not memorialize corner. sent2: something is not disposable if that it is both soluble and not Papuan does not hold. sent3: the glowworm is both not harsh and not a cofounder if there is something such that it is disposable. sent4: if something that is not harsh is not a cofounder then it does not blue constructivist. sent5: the wilderness does blue constructivist if it is harsh. sent6: the fact that the fact that the wilderness does not disrupt and it does not memorialize Gerreidae is incorrect is correct. sent7: the wilderness does color if the cornu blues constructivist. sent8: if the cornu is a disposable and it is a cofounder then it is insoluble. sent9: the urate does color. sent10: if something is indistinguishable then it is not a kind of a porbeagle. sent11: the wilderness does wrestle cornu. sent12: if the wilderness is not harsh that the cornu is not insoluble and it does not memorialize Gerreidae is false. sent13: if that something is a kind of soluble thing that does not memorialize Gerreidae is false then it is not a cofounder. sent14: if the wilderness blues constructivist that the corsair is disposable is true. sent15: the cornu is not a Papuan if there exists something such that it is a materialist or does color or both. sent16: if something is not nondisposable it memorializes corner. sent17: that the wilderness does not blue constructivist and does not memorialize Gerreidae does not hold if the cornu is not harsh. sent18: that the nudist is not Papuan hold. sent19: that the komondor is a kind of a Al-hakim hold if it is insoluble. sent20: the fact that that the XX is a guyot and is not a Papuan is not false does not hold. sent21: the wilderness does not blue constructivist if it is a kind of a Papuan. sent22: the corsair is a kind of a materialist and/or does color. sent23: the cornu is not Papuan and is a colors. sent24: the cornu is a cofounder if it is not Papuan and is a kind of a colors.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wilderness is not harsh.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cornu is not insoluble and it does not memorialize Gerreidae is not right.; sent13 -> int2: if that the cornu is non-insoluble thing that does not memorialize Gerreidae does not hold it is not a cofounder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the cornu is not a cofounder is right.; sent24 & sent23 -> int4: the cornu is a cofounder.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the wilderness is harsh.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the wilderness blues constructivist.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the corsair is a disposable.; sent16 -> int9: if the corsair is a disposable then it does memorialize corner.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the glowworm does not blue constructivist is not wrong.
sent4 -> int10: the glowworm does not blue constructivist if it is both not harsh and not a cofounder.; sent22 -> int11: something is a kind of a materialist and/or it is a colors.; int11 & sent15 -> int12: the cornu is not Papuan.; int12 -> int13: something is not a Papuan.;
$hypothesis$ = the corsair does not memorialize corner. ; $context$ = sent1: the cornu does not memorialize corner. sent2: something is not disposable if that it is both soluble and not Papuan does not hold. sent3: the glowworm is both not harsh and not a cofounder if there is something such that it is disposable. sent4: if something that is not harsh is not a cofounder then it does not blue constructivist. sent5: the wilderness does blue constructivist if it is harsh. sent6: the fact that the fact that the wilderness does not disrupt and it does not memorialize Gerreidae is incorrect is correct. sent7: the wilderness does color if the cornu blues constructivist. sent8: if the cornu is a disposable and it is a cofounder then it is insoluble. sent9: the urate does color. sent10: if something is indistinguishable then it is not a kind of a porbeagle. sent11: the wilderness does wrestle cornu. sent12: if the wilderness is not harsh that the cornu is not insoluble and it does not memorialize Gerreidae is false. sent13: if that something is a kind of soluble thing that does not memorialize Gerreidae is false then it is not a cofounder. sent14: if the wilderness blues constructivist that the corsair is disposable is true. sent15: the cornu is not a Papuan if there exists something such that it is a materialist or does color or both. sent16: if something is not nondisposable it memorializes corner. sent17: that the wilderness does not blue constructivist and does not memorialize Gerreidae does not hold if the cornu is not harsh. sent18: that the nudist is not Papuan hold. sent19: that the komondor is a kind of a Al-hakim hold if it is insoluble. sent20: the fact that that the XX is a guyot and is not a Papuan is not false does not hold. sent21: the wilderness does not blue constructivist if it is a kind of a Papuan. sent22: the corsair is a kind of a materialist and/or does color. sent23: the cornu is not Papuan and is a colors. sent24: the cornu is a cofounder if it is not Papuan and is a kind of a colors. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wilderness is not harsh.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cornu is not insoluble and it does not memorialize Gerreidae is not right.; sent13 -> int2: if that the cornu is non-insoluble thing that does not memorialize Gerreidae does not hold it is not a cofounder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the cornu is not a cofounder is right.; sent24 & sent23 -> int4: the cornu is a cofounder.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the wilderness is harsh.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the wilderness blues constructivist.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the corsair is a disposable.; sent16 -> int9: if the corsair is a disposable then it does memorialize corner.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__