the osteocyte is not a molding.
sent1: if the landmass is not a RAS then the fact that it is a kind of a Lamium that repents is wrong. sent2: the osteocyte broadsides powerhouse. sent3: the pear is not a Lamium if that the landmass is a kind of a Lamium and it repents does not hold. sent4: if that something does not broadside powerhouse and/or it is a kind of a sportscaster is wrong then it does not expire subnormality. sent5: the osteocyte is a Xanthosoma. sent6: the osteocyte broadsides powerhouse and it does expire subnormality. sent7: that the nymph does not broadside powerhouse or it is a sportscaster or both is incorrect if the fact that the pear is not a Lamium hold. sent8: if something expires subnormality then the fact that it is a Dusseldorf and it is not a molding does not hold. sent9: that the osteocyte is a kind of a Dusseldorf and it is a Xanthosoma hold.
sent9 -> int1: the osteocyte is a kind of a Dusseldorf.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the osteocyte is not a molding is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the osteocyte is a kind of a Dusseldorf and is not a molding.; sent8 -> int3: if the osteocyte does expire subnormality the fact that it is a kind of a Dusseldorf that is not a kind of a molding does not hold.; sent6 -> int4: the fact that the osteocyte expires subnormality is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the osteocyte is a Dusseldorf but it is not a molding does not hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the osteocyte is not a molding.
sent4 -> int7: the nymph does not expire subnormality if the fact that either it does not broadside powerhouse or it is a sportscaster or both is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the osteocyte is not a molding. ; $context$ = sent1: if the landmass is not a RAS then the fact that it is a kind of a Lamium that repents is wrong. sent2: the osteocyte broadsides powerhouse. sent3: the pear is not a Lamium if that the landmass is a kind of a Lamium and it repents does not hold. sent4: if that something does not broadside powerhouse and/or it is a kind of a sportscaster is wrong then it does not expire subnormality. sent5: the osteocyte is a Xanthosoma. sent6: the osteocyte broadsides powerhouse and it does expire subnormality. sent7: that the nymph does not broadside powerhouse or it is a sportscaster or both is incorrect if the fact that the pear is not a Lamium hold. sent8: if something expires subnormality then the fact that it is a Dusseldorf and it is not a molding does not hold. sent9: that the osteocyte is a kind of a Dusseldorf and it is a Xanthosoma hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the osteocyte is a kind of a Dusseldorf.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the osteocyte is not a molding is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the osteocyte is a kind of a Dusseldorf and is not a molding.; sent8 -> int3: if the osteocyte does expire subnormality the fact that it is a kind of a Dusseldorf that is not a kind of a molding does not hold.; sent6 -> int4: the fact that the osteocyte expires subnormality is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the osteocyte is a Dusseldorf but it is not a molding does not hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__