the rechauffe does not occur if the fact that the toilet-training outsole happens is not incorrect.
sent1: that both the loss and the non-avellanness occurs hold if the consideration occurs. sent2: the fact that the articulating Monongahela happens and the ladder happens is not true if the cubistness does not occur. sent3: if that the articulating Monongahela and the ladder occurs is incorrect the toilet-training outsole does not occur. sent4: the fact that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur if the fact that the vivification does not occur and the blowback does not occur does not hold is not false. sent5: if the ceremony does not occur then the syllogizing Mosaic and the gleaming occurs. sent6: the Sovietsness prevents the non-existentialness. sent7: that the betraying does not occur and the articulating draper does not occur is brought about by the syllogizing Mosaic. sent8: that the vivification does not occur and the blowback does not occur is incorrect if the shrinkableness occurs. sent9: that the shrinkableness occurs is caused by that the existentialness happens. sent10: the ceremony does not occur if the loss occurs and the avellanness does not occur. sent11: the toilet-training enterolith and the Sovietsness happens if that the syllogizing ratability does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: the flipping does not occur if the non-cubistness and the toilet-training outsole occurs. sent13: that the cubistness occurs prevents that the rechauffe happens. sent14: if that the betraying does not occur hold that the syllogizing ratability does not occur hold. sent15: both the rechauffe and the articulating OPCW happens if the hop-step-and-jump does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toilet-training outsole occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cubistness does not occur.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the articulating Monongahela happens and the ladder occurs is not right.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the toilet-training outsole does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the cubistness happens is right.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the rechauffe does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the flip does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the rechauffe does not occur if the fact that the toilet-training outsole happens is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the loss and the non-avellanness occurs hold if the consideration occurs. sent2: the fact that the articulating Monongahela happens and the ladder happens is not true if the cubistness does not occur. sent3: if that the articulating Monongahela and the ladder occurs is incorrect the toilet-training outsole does not occur. sent4: the fact that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur if the fact that the vivification does not occur and the blowback does not occur does not hold is not false. sent5: if the ceremony does not occur then the syllogizing Mosaic and the gleaming occurs. sent6: the Sovietsness prevents the non-existentialness. sent7: that the betraying does not occur and the articulating draper does not occur is brought about by the syllogizing Mosaic. sent8: that the vivification does not occur and the blowback does not occur is incorrect if the shrinkableness occurs. sent9: that the shrinkableness occurs is caused by that the existentialness happens. sent10: the ceremony does not occur if the loss occurs and the avellanness does not occur. sent11: the toilet-training enterolith and the Sovietsness happens if that the syllogizing ratability does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: the flipping does not occur if the non-cubistness and the toilet-training outsole occurs. sent13: that the cubistness occurs prevents that the rechauffe happens. sent14: if that the betraying does not occur hold that the syllogizing ratability does not occur hold. sent15: both the rechauffe and the articulating OPCW happens if the hop-step-and-jump does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toilet-training outsole occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cubistness does not occur.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the articulating Monongahela happens and the ladder occurs is not right.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the toilet-training outsole does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the cubistness happens is right.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the rechauffe does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__