the hymen does adapt and it is lobate.
sent1: the cutoff detrains and/or is not a kind of a caste. sent2: if the fulminate is an antiaircraft the hymen does adapt. sent3: if that the carpenter is not a caste hold that either the cutoff detrains or it is not a caste or both is wrong. sent4: the fact that something is on-the-job and does not piddle miserliness is not right if it does forecast. sent5: the cutoff does not forecast but it is a cutlery if the carpenter is on-the-job. sent6: the hymen is lobate if that it is both not lobate and not a cutlery is not right. sent7: that something adapts and is lobate is wrong if the fact that it does not forecast is true. sent8: the carpenter is on-the-job if the fulminate detrains. sent9: the fact that the hymen is non-lobate and it is not a cutlery is false if it is predicative. sent10: the hymen is predicative. sent11: that the carpenter is not on-the-job but it forecasts is incorrect if it does not detrain. sent12: the fulminate is non-diagonalizable thing that does not mystify gait. sent13: if the fact that the carpenter is on-the-job but it does not piddle miserliness is not true the fulminate is an antiaircraft.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carpenter does not forecast.; sent4 -> int1: if that the carpenter does forecast is true then that it is on-the-job and does not piddle miserliness is not right.; sent9 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the hymen is not lobate and it is not a cutlery does not hold.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the hymen is lobate.;
the fact that the hymen does adapt and is lobate does not hold.
sent7 -> int4: if the hymen does not forecast the fact that it adapts and it is lobate is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the hymen does adapt and it is lobate. ; $context$ = sent1: the cutoff detrains and/or is not a kind of a caste. sent2: if the fulminate is an antiaircraft the hymen does adapt. sent3: if that the carpenter is not a caste hold that either the cutoff detrains or it is not a caste or both is wrong. sent4: the fact that something is on-the-job and does not piddle miserliness is not right if it does forecast. sent5: the cutoff does not forecast but it is a cutlery if the carpenter is on-the-job. sent6: the hymen is lobate if that it is both not lobate and not a cutlery is not right. sent7: that something adapts and is lobate is wrong if the fact that it does not forecast is true. sent8: the carpenter is on-the-job if the fulminate detrains. sent9: the fact that the hymen is non-lobate and it is not a cutlery is false if it is predicative. sent10: the hymen is predicative. sent11: that the carpenter is not on-the-job but it forecasts is incorrect if it does not detrain. sent12: the fulminate is non-diagonalizable thing that does not mystify gait. sent13: if the fact that the carpenter is on-the-job but it does not piddle miserliness is not true the fulminate is an antiaircraft. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carpenter does not forecast.; sent4 -> int1: if that the carpenter does forecast is true then that it is on-the-job and does not piddle miserliness is not right.; sent9 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the hymen is not lobate and it is not a cutlery does not hold.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the hymen is lobate.; __UNKNOWN__