if the relaxin is not a reformism then that the rope is a florilegium and not a scrape is not correct.
sent1: if the rope is not a segment then that the Saskatoon is a florilegium but it does not scrape is not true. sent2: the rope does not disavow rope. sent3: the Saskatoon is not a kind of a florilegium if that the fact that the relaxin is a reformism that is not a segment does not hold is not false. sent4: if the Saskatoon is not a kind of a segment then the fact that the rope is a florilegium but it does not scrape does not hold. sent5: if something drinks deposition and/or it is not a scrape it is not a scrape. sent6: the hypercoaster is a reformism. sent7: the fact that the relaxin is a reformism and does not segment is not correct if it is not a scrape. sent8: that the rope scrapes but it is not a reformism is false if the relaxin is not a florilegium. sent9: the rope is a kind of a florilegium but it is not a scrape. sent10: that the relaxin is a kind of a reformism that is a scrape is not correct. sent11: that the rope is both a scrape and a reformism does not hold if the relaxin is not a florilegium.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Saskatoon does segment.;
the Saskatoon is not a florilegium.
sent5 -> int1: the relaxin does not scrape if it drinks deposition or it is not a scrape or both.;
$hypothesis$ = if the relaxin is not a reformism then that the rope is a florilegium and not a scrape is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rope is not a segment then that the Saskatoon is a florilegium but it does not scrape is not true. sent2: the rope does not disavow rope. sent3: the Saskatoon is not a kind of a florilegium if that the fact that the relaxin is a reformism that is not a segment does not hold is not false. sent4: if the Saskatoon is not a kind of a segment then the fact that the rope is a florilegium but it does not scrape does not hold. sent5: if something drinks deposition and/or it is not a scrape it is not a scrape. sent6: the hypercoaster is a reformism. sent7: the fact that the relaxin is a reformism and does not segment is not correct if it is not a scrape. sent8: that the rope scrapes but it is not a reformism is false if the relaxin is not a florilegium. sent9: the rope is a kind of a florilegium but it is not a scrape. sent10: that the relaxin is a kind of a reformism that is a scrape is not correct. sent11: that the rope is both a scrape and a reformism does not hold if the relaxin is not a florilegium. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Saskatoon does segment.; __UNKNOWN__