there is something such that if it is not a koto and is not a WLAN it is skinny.
sent1: the dastard is a Safar if it is not albinal and it is not a kind of a WLAN. sent2: if the monsoon is not a kind of a koto and is a WLAN it is a skinny. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a koto and it is not a kind of a WLAN then it is a skinny. sent4: something is proactive if the fact that it does not strand impetigo and is not a blast is not incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it is inconsiderate thing that is not a valetudinarian it is rheologic. sent6: if the dribble is not a WLAN and is not a kind of a turbinate then it strands semi-abstraction. sent7: if the monsoon is not small-capitalization and it is not a Sphecius then it does birdnest discography. sent8: if the monsoon is not rheologic and it is not a kind of a skinny then it is a kind of a horoscopy. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it does not festoon Empetrum and it does not strand Apostle then it is residential is right. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not festoon Sporobolus and is not noncollapsible that it does festoon custodianship is true. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not festoon skilly and is not a kind of a sneezewort then it is not non-doctrinal. sent12: if the monsoon is a kind of a koto but it is not a WLAN then it is a skinny. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a manakin and it is not a chagrin then it is a molar. sent14: there is something such that if it is both not an epistemology and not a Sif it does festoon custodianship. sent15: the monsoon is not non-skinny if it is not a kind of a koto and it is not a WLAN. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a catechism and it does not strand creamery it festoons skilly. sent17: there exists something such that if it is both not a koto and a WLAN then it is a kind of a skinny.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not strand impetigo and it is not a blast it is proactive.
sent4 -> int1: if the adjustment does not strand impetigo and it does not blast it is proactive.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a koto and is not a WLAN it is skinny. ; $context$ = sent1: the dastard is a Safar if it is not albinal and it is not a kind of a WLAN. sent2: if the monsoon is not a kind of a koto and is a WLAN it is a skinny. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a koto and it is not a kind of a WLAN then it is a skinny. sent4: something is proactive if the fact that it does not strand impetigo and is not a blast is not incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it is inconsiderate thing that is not a valetudinarian it is rheologic. sent6: if the dribble is not a WLAN and is not a kind of a turbinate then it strands semi-abstraction. sent7: if the monsoon is not small-capitalization and it is not a Sphecius then it does birdnest discography. sent8: if the monsoon is not rheologic and it is not a kind of a skinny then it is a kind of a horoscopy. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it does not festoon Empetrum and it does not strand Apostle then it is residential is right. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not festoon Sporobolus and is not noncollapsible that it does festoon custodianship is true. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not festoon skilly and is not a kind of a sneezewort then it is not non-doctrinal. sent12: if the monsoon is a kind of a koto but it is not a WLAN then it is a skinny. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a manakin and it is not a chagrin then it is a molar. sent14: there is something such that if it is both not an epistemology and not a Sif it does festoon custodianship. sent15: the monsoon is not non-skinny if it is not a kind of a koto and it is not a WLAN. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a catechism and it does not strand creamery it festoons skilly. sent17: there exists something such that if it is both not a koto and a WLAN then it is a kind of a skinny. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__