either the uplandness or the anorectalness or both happens.
sent1: that the routine does not occur is prevented by that the dial occurs. sent2: if the fact that the bacchanal does not occur hold then the fact that the uplandness happens is true. sent3: that the gallantry does not occur leads to that the by-product does not occur and the bacchanal does not occur. sent4: that the abrogation occurs and the freesia happens prevents the gallantry. sent5: the abrogation happens. sent6: the dial occurs. sent7: that the routine occurs leads to that the exteroceptiveness occurs and the besieging fatalist does not occur.
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the routine occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the exteroceptiveness happens and the besieging fatalist does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = either the uplandness or the anorectalness or both happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the routine does not occur is prevented by that the dial occurs. sent2: if the fact that the bacchanal does not occur hold then the fact that the uplandness happens is true. sent3: that the gallantry does not occur leads to that the by-product does not occur and the bacchanal does not occur. sent4: that the abrogation occurs and the freesia happens prevents the gallantry. sent5: the abrogation happens. sent6: the dial occurs. sent7: that the routine occurs leads to that the exteroceptiveness occurs and the besieging fatalist does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the routine occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the exteroceptiveness happens and the besieging fatalist does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__