that the bombazine is not a Unitarian and/or it is big is not right.
sent1: the postmodernism is either a cabinetwork or not common or both if the nosewheel is a kind of a Lasiocampidae. sent2: the exocrine is not Unitarian if the fact that the semiautomatic is ferric is not wrong. sent3: if the bombazine is ferric then that the semiautomatic is not ferric and/or it is not non-Unitarian is false. sent4: the scope is ferric. sent5: the exocrine nosedives. sent6: the coop is a Lasiocampidae if a pistil does toughen. sent7: that the bombazine is not a kind of a Unitarian and/or it is big is not correct if the fact that the semiautomatic is Unitarian hold. sent8: if something is ferric it is not non-big. sent9: something is meaningless and it crystallizes ostinato. sent10: if the semiautomatic is a kind of a cabinetwork then that the exocrine is not ferric and is not a kind of a nosedive is wrong. sent11: if the semiautomatic nosedives the exocrine is non-Unitarian. sent12: if a ferric thing instructs the exocrine is a Unitarian. sent13: there is something such that it is a kind of a pistil and it does toughen. sent14: something that is ferric is Unitarian. sent15: the fact that either the bombazine is not a Unitarian or it is a nosedive or both is incorrect. sent16: the exocrine is a mannequin and relines insight. sent17: the abductor is ferric if the exocrine does not instruct. sent18: that the exocrine does not instruct and/or it is big is wrong if the bombazine instruct. sent19: the bombazine is not ferric. sent20: if something that instructs nosedives the semiautomatic is ferric. sent21: the exocrine is non-big. sent22: something is nonlexical and it is a pistil. sent23: the fact that the exocrine does instruct is not false. sent24: if the coop is a Lasiocampidae then the nosewheel is a Lasiocampidae. sent25: the exocrine instructs if it is big.
sent23 & sent5 -> int1: the exocrine instructs and does nosedive.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it instructs and it is a nosedive.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the semiautomatic is ferric.; sent14 -> int4: the semiautomatic is a kind of a Unitarian if it is ferric.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the semiautomatic is a Unitarian.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the abductor is ferric.
$hypothesis$ = that the bombazine is not a Unitarian and/or it is big is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the postmodernism is either a cabinetwork or not common or both if the nosewheel is a kind of a Lasiocampidae. sent2: the exocrine is not Unitarian if the fact that the semiautomatic is ferric is not wrong. sent3: if the bombazine is ferric then that the semiautomatic is not ferric and/or it is not non-Unitarian is false. sent4: the scope is ferric. sent5: the exocrine nosedives. sent6: the coop is a Lasiocampidae if a pistil does toughen. sent7: that the bombazine is not a kind of a Unitarian and/or it is big is not correct if the fact that the semiautomatic is Unitarian hold. sent8: if something is ferric it is not non-big. sent9: something is meaningless and it crystallizes ostinato. sent10: if the semiautomatic is a kind of a cabinetwork then that the exocrine is not ferric and is not a kind of a nosedive is wrong. sent11: if the semiautomatic nosedives the exocrine is non-Unitarian. sent12: if a ferric thing instructs the exocrine is a Unitarian. sent13: there is something such that it is a kind of a pistil and it does toughen. sent14: something that is ferric is Unitarian. sent15: the fact that either the bombazine is not a Unitarian or it is a nosedive or both is incorrect. sent16: the exocrine is a mannequin and relines insight. sent17: the abductor is ferric if the exocrine does not instruct. sent18: that the exocrine does not instruct and/or it is big is wrong if the bombazine instruct. sent19: the bombazine is not ferric. sent20: if something that instructs nosedives the semiautomatic is ferric. sent21: the exocrine is non-big. sent22: something is nonlexical and it is a pistil. sent23: the fact that the exocrine does instruct is not false. sent24: if the coop is a Lasiocampidae then the nosewheel is a Lasiocampidae. sent25: the exocrine instructs if it is big. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent5 -> int1: the exocrine instructs and does nosedive.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it instructs and it is a nosedive.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the semiautomatic is ferric.; sent14 -> int4: the semiautomatic is a kind of a Unitarian if it is ferric.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the semiautomatic is a Unitarian.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__