there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Butterfield then it either is a kind of a anticholinergic or is not a kind of a sportswear or both.
sent1: if the snow is lax then it either is a Laridae or is not a Kant or both. sent2: if something is not a Butterfield then it is both not a Kant and a twang. sent3: the snow is artistic or does not dun marble or both. sent4: the snow is a reform if it is both not a sportswear and Olympics. sent5: if something is not a Kant but it does twang the fact that it is not a sportswear is not false.
sent2 -> int1: the snow is not a Kant but it twangs if it is not a Butterfield.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snow is not a Butterfield.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the snow is not a Kant but it does twang.; sent5 -> int3: if the snow is not a Kant but it does twang then it is not a sportswear.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the snow is not a sportswear hold.; int4 -> int5: either the snow is a kind of a anticholinergic or it is not a sportswear or both.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the snow is a anticholinergic or is not a kind of a sportswear or both if that it is not a Butterfield is not incorrect.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Butterfield then it either is a kind of a anticholinergic or is not a kind of a sportswear or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the snow is lax then it either is a Laridae or is not a Kant or both. sent2: if something is not a Butterfield then it is both not a Kant and a twang. sent3: the snow is artistic or does not dun marble or both. sent4: the snow is a reform if it is both not a sportswear and Olympics. sent5: if something is not a Kant but it does twang the fact that it is not a sportswear is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the snow is not a Kant but it twangs if it is not a Butterfield.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snow is not a Butterfield.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the snow is not a Kant but it does twang.; sent5 -> int3: if the snow is not a Kant but it does twang then it is not a sportswear.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the snow is not a sportswear hold.; int4 -> int5: either the snow is a kind of a anticholinergic or it is not a sportswear or both.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the snow is a anticholinergic or is not a kind of a sportswear or both if that it is not a Butterfield is not incorrect.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__