the nomogram does not varnish enervation but it is unwieldy.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not varnish hajj and is carpellary does not hold then the pyocyanase does smut. sent2: the fact that the housemate does not ignore oxytocin and is a tangor is incorrect if there is something such that it is not Melanesian. sent3: if the fact that the sexpot severs is not right that the lodge is not a brocade but it varnishes Tantalus is not correct. sent4: the housemate varnishes enervation and it is Melanesian if it is not carpellary. sent5: the lodge does varnish hajj if the pyocyanase does varnish hajj. sent6: if the schist ignores outhouse then the fact that it does sever and is not a kind of an ethology is false. sent7: the sexpot does not sever. sent8: something is not a brocade but it is carpellary. sent9: that if the Mexican is not an ethology the nomogram does not varnish enervation but it is unwieldy is correct. sent10: the fact that there is something such that it is unrenewable is not false. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does varnish hajj and is carpellary is not right. sent12: if there exists something such that it is unrenewable the Mexican is not a checkerboard. sent13: if the Mexican is a kind of a establishmentarianism the schist does ignore outhouse. sent14: that the Mexican is not an ethology if the schist does not smut hold. sent15: either the schist is not a smut or it is not a brocade or both if the lodge is a kind of a smut. sent16: if the housemate is not non-Melanesian the lodge does not brocade but it does varnish Tantalus. sent17: the lodge does not brocade. sent18: if the lodge is not carpellary and is a smut the housemate is not carpellary. sent19: that the nomogram is unwieldy hold if the Mexican is not an ethology. sent20: if the pyocyanase is a smut then the schist is not a smut and/or is not a Nubian. sent21: something that is not a checkerboard is a establishmentarianism or is not a kind of a troublesomeness or both. sent22: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Nubian then either the pyocyanase varnishes hajj or it is a Nubian or both. sent23: the fact that something does not varnish hajj and is not non-carpellary is false if it is not Melanesian. sent24: something is a Nubian if that it severs and is not an ethology is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the housemate is Melanesian.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the lodge is not a kind of a brocade but it varnishes Tantalus.; sent3 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the lodge is not a brocade but it varnishes Tantalus does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the housemate is not Melanesian is right.; sent23 -> int5: the fact that if the fact that the housemate is not Melanesian hold that the housemate does not varnish hajj but it is carpellary is wrong is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the housemate does not varnish hajj but it is carpellary is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not varnish hajj and is carpellary does not hold.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the pyocyanase does smut.; int8 & sent20 -> int9: the schist is not a smut and/or it is not a Nubian.;
there exists something such that that it does not ignore oxytocin and is a tangor does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the nomogram does not varnish enervation but it is unwieldy. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not varnish hajj and is carpellary does not hold then the pyocyanase does smut. sent2: the fact that the housemate does not ignore oxytocin and is a tangor is incorrect if there is something such that it is not Melanesian. sent3: if the fact that the sexpot severs is not right that the lodge is not a brocade but it varnishes Tantalus is not correct. sent4: the housemate varnishes enervation and it is Melanesian if it is not carpellary. sent5: the lodge does varnish hajj if the pyocyanase does varnish hajj. sent6: if the schist ignores outhouse then the fact that it does sever and is not a kind of an ethology is false. sent7: the sexpot does not sever. sent8: something is not a brocade but it is carpellary. sent9: that if the Mexican is not an ethology the nomogram does not varnish enervation but it is unwieldy is correct. sent10: the fact that there is something such that it is unrenewable is not false. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does varnish hajj and is carpellary is not right. sent12: if there exists something such that it is unrenewable the Mexican is not a checkerboard. sent13: if the Mexican is a kind of a establishmentarianism the schist does ignore outhouse. sent14: that the Mexican is not an ethology if the schist does not smut hold. sent15: either the schist is not a smut or it is not a brocade or both if the lodge is a kind of a smut. sent16: if the housemate is not non-Melanesian the lodge does not brocade but it does varnish Tantalus. sent17: the lodge does not brocade. sent18: if the lodge is not carpellary and is a smut the housemate is not carpellary. sent19: that the nomogram is unwieldy hold if the Mexican is not an ethology. sent20: if the pyocyanase is a smut then the schist is not a smut and/or is not a Nubian. sent21: something that is not a checkerboard is a establishmentarianism or is not a kind of a troublesomeness or both. sent22: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Nubian then either the pyocyanase varnishes hajj or it is a Nubian or both. sent23: the fact that something does not varnish hajj and is not non-carpellary is false if it is not Melanesian. sent24: something is a Nubian if that it severs and is not an ethology is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the housemate is Melanesian.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the lodge is not a kind of a brocade but it varnishes Tantalus.; sent3 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the lodge is not a brocade but it varnishes Tantalus does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the housemate is not Melanesian is right.; sent23 -> int5: the fact that if the fact that the housemate is not Melanesian hold that the housemate does not varnish hajj but it is carpellary is wrong is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the housemate does not varnish hajj but it is carpellary is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not varnish hajj and is carpellary does not hold.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the pyocyanase does smut.; int8 & sent20 -> int9: the schist is not a smut and/or it is not a Nubian.; __UNKNOWN__