the poplar is both a splashed and a Vigna.
sent1: if the sunporch is a kind of a Opposition then the poplar is a coffeeberry. sent2: if the sunporch is not a kind of a couple the fact that it is a kind of a Tartuffe and does not indurate psaltery is wrong. sent3: if something is not a coffeeberry then it is a kind of a Opposition. sent4: the sunporch does not clap rhizotomy and indurates psaltery if the parallel is a Trumbo. sent5: a coffeeberry is a Vigna. sent6: if the parallel is not parental it is a couple and it is a kind of a Tartuffe. sent7: something does not clap rhizotomy if it is not a Trumbo. sent8: the fact that the sunporch does clap rhizotomy is correct if it is a kind of a Chinaman and it is not a kind of a gambrel. sent9: the poplar is not a splashed but a coffeeberry if the parallel does couple. sent10: if the fact that the sunporch is a Chinaman and is not a gambrel is wrong then it is a Opposition. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Opposition the bomblet is not a kind of a Trumbo. sent12: the fact that something splashes and is a Vigna does not hold if that it does not indurate psaltery is correct. sent13: if the sunporch claps rhizotomy then it does not indurate psaltery and it is a Trumbo. sent14: if the parallel is ill the poplar does splash. sent15: the sunporch is not a couple. sent16: the sunporch does indurate psaltery if the fact that it is a Tartuffe and does not indurate psaltery is not true. sent17: the poplar splashes if the parallel is parental. sent18: the tauon is not a coffeeberry if the baa-lamb is a coffeeberry. sent19: something does indurate psaltery and it is a Vigna if it does not clap rhizotomy. sent20: the parallel is a Trumbo if the tauon is a Opposition and is not a Trumbo.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunporch is a Chinaman but it is not a gambrel.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sunporch claps rhizotomy is not wrong.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the sunporch does not indurate psaltery and is a Trumbo.; int2 -> int3: the sunporch does not indurate psaltery.; sent2 & sent15 -> int4: the fact that the sunporch is a Tartuffe and does not indurate psaltery is not true.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the sunporch does indurate psaltery is not wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the sunporch is a Chinaman but it is not a gambrel is wrong.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the sunporch is a Opposition.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the poplar is a kind of a coffeeberry.; sent5 -> int10: if the poplar is a kind of a coffeeberry it is a Vigna.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the poplar is a Vigna.;
the bomblet is a kind of a Vigna.
sent19 -> int12: the bomblet indurates psaltery and it is a kind of a Vigna if that it does not clap rhizotomy is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int13: if the bomblet is not a Trumbo then it does not clap rhizotomy.;
$hypothesis$ = the poplar is both a splashed and a Vigna. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sunporch is a kind of a Opposition then the poplar is a coffeeberry. sent2: if the sunporch is not a kind of a couple the fact that it is a kind of a Tartuffe and does not indurate psaltery is wrong. sent3: if something is not a coffeeberry then it is a kind of a Opposition. sent4: the sunporch does not clap rhizotomy and indurates psaltery if the parallel is a Trumbo. sent5: a coffeeberry is a Vigna. sent6: if the parallel is not parental it is a couple and it is a kind of a Tartuffe. sent7: something does not clap rhizotomy if it is not a Trumbo. sent8: the fact that the sunporch does clap rhizotomy is correct if it is a kind of a Chinaman and it is not a kind of a gambrel. sent9: the poplar is not a splashed but a coffeeberry if the parallel does couple. sent10: if the fact that the sunporch is a Chinaman and is not a gambrel is wrong then it is a Opposition. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Opposition the bomblet is not a kind of a Trumbo. sent12: the fact that something splashes and is a Vigna does not hold if that it does not indurate psaltery is correct. sent13: if the sunporch claps rhizotomy then it does not indurate psaltery and it is a Trumbo. sent14: if the parallel is ill the poplar does splash. sent15: the sunporch is not a couple. sent16: the sunporch does indurate psaltery if the fact that it is a Tartuffe and does not indurate psaltery is not true. sent17: the poplar splashes if the parallel is parental. sent18: the tauon is not a coffeeberry if the baa-lamb is a coffeeberry. sent19: something does indurate psaltery and it is a Vigna if it does not clap rhizotomy. sent20: the parallel is a Trumbo if the tauon is a Opposition and is not a Trumbo. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunporch is a Chinaman but it is not a gambrel.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sunporch claps rhizotomy is not wrong.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the sunporch does not indurate psaltery and is a Trumbo.; int2 -> int3: the sunporch does not indurate psaltery.; sent2 & sent15 -> int4: the fact that the sunporch is a Tartuffe and does not indurate psaltery is not true.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the sunporch does indurate psaltery is not wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the sunporch is a Chinaman but it is not a gambrel is wrong.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the sunporch is a Opposition.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the poplar is a kind of a coffeeberry.; sent5 -> int10: if the poplar is a kind of a coffeeberry it is a Vigna.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the poplar is a Vigna.; __UNKNOWN__