that the centrum is a jonquil but it is not a traction is not correct.
sent1: that the centrum is illative thing that tinsels groaner is incorrect if the aphorist is not a discernment. sent2: that something is not a discernment and tinsels groaner is not correct if it is ineradicable. sent3: the centrum does not tinsel groaner if the fact that it is not a discernment and tinsel groaner does not hold. sent4: if the semigloss does tinsel countermand it does brief paddlefish. sent5: that the physiotherapist is a jonquil is true. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that that it briefs L-dopa and it does not tinsel ragtime is not false is not right the aphorist is ineradicable. sent7: the centrum is a anxiolytic. sent8: the fact that the centrum is a thermochemistry is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the semigloss briefs L-dopa but it does not tinsel ragtime is incorrect if it briefs entomion. sent10: if something is mammary and it is ineradicable then it is not a kind of a discernment. sent11: something is mammary if it does fold. sent12: if that the canon is not a kind of a S.U.V. and does dusk is false the aphorist is a folding. sent13: the fact that the canon is not a S.U.V. and dusks is wrong. sent14: the semigloss tinsels countermand. sent15: the fact that the ectoplasm is not a kind of a jonquil if that the centrum is illative and it tinsels groaner is false is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the centrum is illative hold. sent17: the centrum is a jonquil if it is illative. sent18: the arrowhead is not a traction. sent19: if the semigloss does brief paddlefish that it does brief entomion is not false. sent20: if something does not tinsel groaner it is anxiolytic and it is illative. sent21: the centrum is not a traction but it is anxiolytic. sent22: the centrum mangles birchbark.
sent21 -> int1: the centrum is not a traction.; sent17 & sent16 -> int2: the centrum is a jonquil.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the ectoplasm is a traction.
sent10 -> int3: the aphorist is not a kind of a discernment if it is mammary and it is ineradicable.; sent11 -> int4: the aphorist is mammary if it is a folding.; sent12 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the aphorist is a kind of a folding hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the aphorist is mammary.; sent4 & sent14 -> int7: the semigloss briefs paddlefish.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the semigloss briefs entomion.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: that the semigloss does brief L-dopa and does not tinsel ragtime is not right.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it does brief L-dopa and does not tinsel ragtime is not true.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the aphorist is ineradicable.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the aphorist is mammary and ineradicable.; int3 & int12 -> int13: the aphorist is not a discernment.; sent1 & int13 -> int14: that the centrum is illative and does tinsel groaner is not correct.; sent15 & int14 -> int15: the ectoplasm is not a kind of a jonquil.;
$hypothesis$ = that the centrum is a jonquil but it is not a traction is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the centrum is illative thing that tinsels groaner is incorrect if the aphorist is not a discernment. sent2: that something is not a discernment and tinsels groaner is not correct if it is ineradicable. sent3: the centrum does not tinsel groaner if the fact that it is not a discernment and tinsel groaner does not hold. sent4: if the semigloss does tinsel countermand it does brief paddlefish. sent5: that the physiotherapist is a jonquil is true. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that that it briefs L-dopa and it does not tinsel ragtime is not false is not right the aphorist is ineradicable. sent7: the centrum is a anxiolytic. sent8: the fact that the centrum is a thermochemistry is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the semigloss briefs L-dopa but it does not tinsel ragtime is incorrect if it briefs entomion. sent10: if something is mammary and it is ineradicable then it is not a kind of a discernment. sent11: something is mammary if it does fold. sent12: if that the canon is not a kind of a S.U.V. and does dusk is false the aphorist is a folding. sent13: the fact that the canon is not a S.U.V. and dusks is wrong. sent14: the semigloss tinsels countermand. sent15: the fact that the ectoplasm is not a kind of a jonquil if that the centrum is illative and it tinsels groaner is false is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the centrum is illative hold. sent17: the centrum is a jonquil if it is illative. sent18: the arrowhead is not a traction. sent19: if the semigloss does brief paddlefish that it does brief entomion is not false. sent20: if something does not tinsel groaner it is anxiolytic and it is illative. sent21: the centrum is not a traction but it is anxiolytic. sent22: the centrum mangles birchbark. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: the centrum is not a traction.; sent17 & sent16 -> int2: the centrum is a jonquil.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__