there is something such that it is uncut and it syllogizes.
sent1: The palpitation does pleach haywire. sent2: that the haywire is not proprioceptive or it is a Palmae or both does not hold if it pleaches palpitation. sent3: the fact that the mailer syllogizes hold if it is proprioceptive. sent4: the mailer is uncut if the fact that the midshipman pleaches CIM but it is not a mono-iodotyrosine does not hold. sent5: the harbor vaticinates and does pleach monosomy. sent6: if something is not cut it does not syllogize or is reversible or both. sent7: the haywire does pleach palpitation. sent8: the haywire pleaches CIM. sent9: something that is a mono-iodotyrosine does pleach CIM. sent10: the haywire is not proprioceptive or it is a Palmae or both if the mailer does not syllogize. sent11: the midshipman does syllogize and/or it does pleach CIM. sent12: the fact that if the harbor does vaticinate then the harbor dibbles is right. sent13: the fact that the midshipman is a kind of a mono-iodotyrosine and it is proprioceptive is wrong. sent14: if something pleaches CIM then it is uncut. sent15: if something pleaches palpitation then it is a mono-iodotyrosine. sent16: something pleaches palpitation if it is a dibble.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mailer does not syllogize.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the haywire is not proprioceptive or is a kind of a Palmae or both.; sent2 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the haywire is not proprioceptive and/or it is a kind of a Palmae is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the mailer does syllogize.;
the harbor does not syllogize and/or it is a reversible.
sent6 -> int5: if the harbor is uncut then either it does not syllogize or it is reversible or both.; sent14 -> int6: the harbor is uncut if it does pleach CIM.; sent9 -> int7: the harbor pleaches CIM if that it is a mono-iodotyrosine is right.; sent15 -> int8: the harbor is a mono-iodotyrosine if it pleaches palpitation.; sent16 -> int9: the harbor does pleach palpitation if it does dibble.; sent5 -> int10: the harbor vaticinates.; sent12 & int10 -> int11: the harbor is a kind of a dibble.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the harbor pleaches palpitation.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the harbor is a mono-iodotyrosine.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the harbor pleaches CIM.; int6 & int14 -> int15: the harbor is uncut.; int5 & int15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is uncut and it syllogizes. ; $context$ = sent1: The palpitation does pleach haywire. sent2: that the haywire is not proprioceptive or it is a Palmae or both does not hold if it pleaches palpitation. sent3: the fact that the mailer syllogizes hold if it is proprioceptive. sent4: the mailer is uncut if the fact that the midshipman pleaches CIM but it is not a mono-iodotyrosine does not hold. sent5: the harbor vaticinates and does pleach monosomy. sent6: if something is not cut it does not syllogize or is reversible or both. sent7: the haywire does pleach palpitation. sent8: the haywire pleaches CIM. sent9: something that is a mono-iodotyrosine does pleach CIM. sent10: the haywire is not proprioceptive or it is a Palmae or both if the mailer does not syllogize. sent11: the midshipman does syllogize and/or it does pleach CIM. sent12: the fact that if the harbor does vaticinate then the harbor dibbles is right. sent13: the fact that the midshipman is a kind of a mono-iodotyrosine and it is proprioceptive is wrong. sent14: if something pleaches CIM then it is uncut. sent15: if something pleaches palpitation then it is a mono-iodotyrosine. sent16: something pleaches palpitation if it is a dibble. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mailer does not syllogize.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the haywire is not proprioceptive or is a kind of a Palmae or both.; sent2 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the haywire is not proprioceptive and/or it is a kind of a Palmae is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the mailer does syllogize.; __UNKNOWN__