that the guaranteeing cuscus occurs and the trespass happens if the rub-a-dub does not occur does not hold.
sent1: that the guaranteeing cuscus does not occur and the rub-a-dub does not occur does not hold. sent2: that the ductlessness does not occur brings about that the trespass occurs and the laicizing Kabul happens. sent3: the mikvah occurs. sent4: the fact that not the actualizing but the vertebralness happens is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the ringer does not occur and the affairs happens is wrong. sent6: that the holophyticness happens and the queening servant happens is triggered by that the laicizing brushwork does not occur. sent7: if the wiriness does not occur then the laicizing grenade and the securing occurs. sent8: the guaranteeing assignee does not occur. sent9: the chancrousness does not occur. sent10: the ductlessness does not occur. sent11: that the fact that not the guaranteeing cuscus but the rub-a-dub occurs is correct is incorrect. sent12: the catarrhalness happens. sent13: that the laicizing Kabul occurs hold. sent14: if the tracing Osaka does not occur the dovetail and the bizonalness happens. sent15: the demagogicness occurs. sent16: the laicizing Goldsmith does not occur and the queening Chartist does not occur. sent17: both the distalness and the adaptiveness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the guaranteeing cuscus does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the rub-a-dub does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the guaranteeing cuscus does not occur and the rub-a-dub does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the guaranteeing cuscus happens is right.; sent2 & sent10 -> int4: the trespassing and the laicizing Kabul occurs.; int4 -> int5: the trespass happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the guaranteeing cuscus and the trespass happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the guaranteeing cuscus occurs and the trespass happens if the rub-a-dub does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the guaranteeing cuscus does not occur and the rub-a-dub does not occur does not hold. sent2: that the ductlessness does not occur brings about that the trespass occurs and the laicizing Kabul happens. sent3: the mikvah occurs. sent4: the fact that not the actualizing but the vertebralness happens is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the ringer does not occur and the affairs happens is wrong. sent6: that the holophyticness happens and the queening servant happens is triggered by that the laicizing brushwork does not occur. sent7: if the wiriness does not occur then the laicizing grenade and the securing occurs. sent8: the guaranteeing assignee does not occur. sent9: the chancrousness does not occur. sent10: the ductlessness does not occur. sent11: that the fact that not the guaranteeing cuscus but the rub-a-dub occurs is correct is incorrect. sent12: the catarrhalness happens. sent13: that the laicizing Kabul occurs hold. sent14: if the tracing Osaka does not occur the dovetail and the bizonalness happens. sent15: the demagogicness occurs. sent16: the laicizing Goldsmith does not occur and the queening Chartist does not occur. sent17: both the distalness and the adaptiveness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the guaranteeing cuscus does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the rub-a-dub does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the guaranteeing cuscus does not occur and the rub-a-dub does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the guaranteeing cuscus happens is right.; sent2 & sent10 -> int4: the trespassing and the laicizing Kabul occurs.; int4 -> int5: the trespass happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the guaranteeing cuscus and the trespass happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__