the neurogenicness or the resisting postulation or both occurs.
sent1: if that the neurogenicness occurs is true then the spot-welding occurs. sent2: the strangulating sparkling occurs or the marking occurs or both. sent3: either the Liechtensteinerness occurs or the lengthwiseness occurs or both. sent4: the fact that the fact that either the neurogenicness or the resisting postulation or both occurs is not right if the fact that the resisting catheterization does not occur is true is right. sent5: if the deserving cipher does not occur then the resisting postulation occurs. sent6: the fact that not the pilot but the deserving cipher occurs is incorrect. sent7: if the fact that the pilot does not occur and the deserving cipher occurs does not hold then the resisting postulation happens.
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the resisting postulation occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the neurogenicness happens or the resisting postulation occurs or both is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the neurogenicness or the resisting postulation or both occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the neurogenicness occurs is true then the spot-welding occurs. sent2: the strangulating sparkling occurs or the marking occurs or both. sent3: either the Liechtensteinerness occurs or the lengthwiseness occurs or both. sent4: the fact that the fact that either the neurogenicness or the resisting postulation or both occurs is not right if the fact that the resisting catheterization does not occur is true is right. sent5: if the deserving cipher does not occur then the resisting postulation occurs. sent6: the fact that not the pilot but the deserving cipher occurs is incorrect. sent7: if the fact that the pilot does not occur and the deserving cipher occurs does not hold then the resisting postulation happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the resisting postulation occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__