the puffing is not anapestic.
sent1: if something that does not recombine hair-raiser is a kind of a fog it is not anapestic. sent2: the puffing is anapestic if the psaltery does recombine hair-raiser. sent3: the puffing is a fog that is morphologic. sent4: the psaltery is a fog. sent5: the psaltery is a fog and it does recombine hair-raiser. sent6: the casern is anapestic. sent7: the lomustine is anapestic. sent8: the panderer does splutter zygoma and it is sane. sent9: the cultist is not inhumane. sent10: that the puffing is a fog hold if the psaltery is anapestic.
sent5 -> int1: the psaltery recombines hair-raiser.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the puffing is not anapestic.
sent1 -> int2: if the puffing does not recombine hair-raiser but it is a kind of a fog it is not anapestic.;
$hypothesis$ = the puffing is not anapestic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does not recombine hair-raiser is a kind of a fog it is not anapestic. sent2: the puffing is anapestic if the psaltery does recombine hair-raiser. sent3: the puffing is a fog that is morphologic. sent4: the psaltery is a fog. sent5: the psaltery is a fog and it does recombine hair-raiser. sent6: the casern is anapestic. sent7: the lomustine is anapestic. sent8: the panderer does splutter zygoma and it is sane. sent9: the cultist is not inhumane. sent10: that the puffing is a fog hold if the psaltery is anapestic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the psaltery recombines hair-raiser.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__