the kit is deaf.
sent1: if that the grade flickers Motherwell and is not hospitable is false then the bull's-eye does not flickers Motherwell. sent2: if the kit is a verapamil then it is a deaf. sent3: the bull's-eye is not a kind of a nudge. sent4: the fact that something is not a anarchism but it fans is wrong if it does not talc Mansi. sent5: the iceboat is not a verapamil. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is hospitable but not aerobic does not hold. sent7: the kit is not non-hungry. sent8: the fact that something is a verapamil and is a moo does not hold if it is not a icecap. sent9: that the kit is both a verapamil and a moo is incorrect. sent10: if the kit is not a icecap the fact that it is a kind of a verapamil and does moo is wrong. sent11: if the bull's-eye is not a nudge it does flicker Motherwell and it does talc Schopenhauer. sent12: the kit does equalize. sent13: the kit is not a icecap. sent14: something is not a kind of a deaf if it does talc Schopenhauer and it is a kind of a icecap. sent15: that the fact that the bull's-eye flickers leavened is correct does not hold if it does not flicker Motherwell. sent16: if the bull's-eye talcs Schopenhauer then the kit talcs Schopenhauer. sent17: that something is not a kind of a verapamil but it is a kind of a moo is incorrect if it is not a icecap. sent18: if that the kit is not a verapamil and is a moo is not right it is a deaf. sent19: the snook is a deaf. sent20: if the bull's-eye does not flicker leavened then the defecator is a kind of a icecap and does talc Schopenhauer.
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the kit is not a icecap hold the fact that it is not a kind of a verapamil and it is a moo does not hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the fact that the kit is not a verapamil but it is a moo is right does not hold.; int2 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the defecator is a deaf.
$hypothesis$ = the kit is deaf. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the grade flickers Motherwell and is not hospitable is false then the bull's-eye does not flickers Motherwell. sent2: if the kit is a verapamil then it is a deaf. sent3: the bull's-eye is not a kind of a nudge. sent4: the fact that something is not a anarchism but it fans is wrong if it does not talc Mansi. sent5: the iceboat is not a verapamil. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is hospitable but not aerobic does not hold. sent7: the kit is not non-hungry. sent8: the fact that something is a verapamil and is a moo does not hold if it is not a icecap. sent9: that the kit is both a verapamil and a moo is incorrect. sent10: if the kit is not a icecap the fact that it is a kind of a verapamil and does moo is wrong. sent11: if the bull's-eye is not a nudge it does flicker Motherwell and it does talc Schopenhauer. sent12: the kit does equalize. sent13: the kit is not a icecap. sent14: something is not a kind of a deaf if it does talc Schopenhauer and it is a kind of a icecap. sent15: that the fact that the bull's-eye flickers leavened is correct does not hold if it does not flicker Motherwell. sent16: if the bull's-eye talcs Schopenhauer then the kit talcs Schopenhauer. sent17: that something is not a kind of a verapamil but it is a kind of a moo is incorrect if it is not a icecap. sent18: if that the kit is not a verapamil and is a moo is not right it is a deaf. sent19: the snook is a deaf. sent20: if the bull's-eye does not flicker leavened then the defecator is a kind of a icecap and does talc Schopenhauer. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the kit is not a icecap hold the fact that it is not a kind of a verapamil and it is a moo does not hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the fact that the kit is not a verapamil but it is a moo is right does not hold.; int2 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__