that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a fibroma and it does not treble coyote does not hold then it thirsts NRC is not true.
sent1: something is a usufructuary if the fact that it is not three-wheel and it is not a kind of a sketch is false. sent2: the fact that the rejuvenation is a kind of a misbehavior is not wrong if the fact that it is a fibroma and not a explicitness is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it is colorimetric then it is hydroxy. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it does not treble horsebox and it does not scream antidepressant is wrong then it is a ninepins. sent5: if the rejuvenation does not scream Ashkhabad and does not treble coyote then it is blastocoelic. sent6: the stemma is extrinsic if the fact that it does not thirst NRC and does not madden is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it is psychoanalytical then it is a kind of a headache. sent8: there is something such that if it is non-bicylindrical and unpreventable it does scream antidepressant. sent9: if the fact that the rejuvenation is not a fibroma and does not treble coyote is incorrect it thirsts NRC. sent10: there exists something such that if it is puerperal it screams antidepressant. sent11: if the fact that the rejuvenation does treble coyote is not false then that it thirsts NRC is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a fibroma and trebles coyote is incorrect it thirsts NRC.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is a kind of non-three-wheel thing that is not a kind of a sketch is not true it is a kind of a usufructuary.
sent1 -> int1: if that the defender is non-three-wheel thing that does not sketch does not hold then the fact that it is a usufructuary hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a fibroma and it does not treble coyote does not hold then it thirsts NRC is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a usufructuary if the fact that it is not three-wheel and it is not a kind of a sketch is false. sent2: the fact that the rejuvenation is a kind of a misbehavior is not wrong if the fact that it is a fibroma and not a explicitness is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it is colorimetric then it is hydroxy. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it does not treble horsebox and it does not scream antidepressant is wrong then it is a ninepins. sent5: if the rejuvenation does not scream Ashkhabad and does not treble coyote then it is blastocoelic. sent6: the stemma is extrinsic if the fact that it does not thirst NRC and does not madden is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it is psychoanalytical then it is a kind of a headache. sent8: there is something such that if it is non-bicylindrical and unpreventable it does scream antidepressant. sent9: if the fact that the rejuvenation is not a fibroma and does not treble coyote is incorrect it thirsts NRC. sent10: there exists something such that if it is puerperal it screams antidepressant. sent11: if the fact that the rejuvenation does treble coyote is not false then that it thirsts NRC is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a fibroma and trebles coyote is incorrect it thirsts NRC. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__