something is not non-terminal and/or it does interfere.
sent1: that the Sphinx is not a passivity and is uncreative is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the inkberry does not occidentalize sea-rocket but it is terminal is not correct then the fact that the Sphinx is a radiator is not incorrect. sent3: if the fact that the Sphinx is a terminal is not incorrect then the inkberry does occidentalize sea-rocket. sent4: there exists something such that it is a radiator or it interferes or both. sent5: the fact that the Sphinx does not occidentalize sea-rocket and is a radiator is false. sent6: the Sphinx does occidentalize sea-rocket if that the inkberry is non-terminal a radiator does not hold. sent7: the inkberry does occidentalize sea-rocket and/or it is a terminal. sent8: the inkberry does interfere if the Sphinx is not a radiator. sent9: the Sphinx is a kind of a terminal if that the inkberry does not interfere and occidentalizes sea-rocket is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = something is not non-terminal and/or it does interfere. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Sphinx is not a passivity and is uncreative is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the inkberry does not occidentalize sea-rocket but it is terminal is not correct then the fact that the Sphinx is a radiator is not incorrect. sent3: if the fact that the Sphinx is a terminal is not incorrect then the inkberry does occidentalize sea-rocket. sent4: there exists something such that it is a radiator or it interferes or both. sent5: the fact that the Sphinx does not occidentalize sea-rocket and is a radiator is false. sent6: the Sphinx does occidentalize sea-rocket if that the inkberry is non-terminal a radiator does not hold. sent7: the inkberry does occidentalize sea-rocket and/or it is a terminal. sent8: the inkberry does interfere if the Sphinx is not a radiator. sent9: the Sphinx is a kind of a terminal if that the inkberry does not interfere and occidentalizes sea-rocket is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__