the faro but not the understanding occurs.
sent1: that the flaking money and the understanding happens is incorrect. sent2: that the quitclaim occurs is true if the enlistment occurs. sent3: the hell does not occur. sent4: not the malarialness but the trephining happens. sent5: if the methodologicalness does not occur not the cliffhanger but the heliolatry occurs. sent6: the fact that the fistulousness happens hold if the flaking Hereford does not occur. sent7: both the exportableness and the identification happens if the permeation does not occur. sent8: the countermining occurs but the systematization does not occur if the heliolatry occurs. sent9: the understanding does not occur if the fact that the flaking money and the understanding happens is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the benefit happens and the reflux occurs does not hold. sent11: that the flaking governorship happens prevents that the systematization does not occur. sent12: the fact that the quitclaim happens and the tipping NRC happens is not right. sent13: the overusing Hereford does not occur. sent14: that the ferromagnetism but not the smashing occurs is caused by the flaking Hereford. sent15: that the premiere does not occur and the methodologicalness occurs is brought about by that the heliolatry does not occur. sent16: the nebulousness happens. sent17: if the fact that the premiere does not occur is not wrong the faro happens. sent18: the uneagerness occurs. sent19: that both the metrologicalness and the healthiness occurs is not true. sent20: the overusing Minuteman occurs. sent21: the indistinguishableness happens. sent22: the offering occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heliolatry occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the countermine happens but the systematization does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the systematization does not occur.; sent9 & sent1 -> int3: the understanding does not occur.;
the fact that the faro happens and the understanding does not occur is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the faro but not the understanding occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the flaking money and the understanding happens is incorrect. sent2: that the quitclaim occurs is true if the enlistment occurs. sent3: the hell does not occur. sent4: not the malarialness but the trephining happens. sent5: if the methodologicalness does not occur not the cliffhanger but the heliolatry occurs. sent6: the fact that the fistulousness happens hold if the flaking Hereford does not occur. sent7: both the exportableness and the identification happens if the permeation does not occur. sent8: the countermining occurs but the systematization does not occur if the heliolatry occurs. sent9: the understanding does not occur if the fact that the flaking money and the understanding happens is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the benefit happens and the reflux occurs does not hold. sent11: that the flaking governorship happens prevents that the systematization does not occur. sent12: the fact that the quitclaim happens and the tipping NRC happens is not right. sent13: the overusing Hereford does not occur. sent14: that the ferromagnetism but not the smashing occurs is caused by the flaking Hereford. sent15: that the premiere does not occur and the methodologicalness occurs is brought about by that the heliolatry does not occur. sent16: the nebulousness happens. sent17: if the fact that the premiere does not occur is not wrong the faro happens. sent18: the uneagerness occurs. sent19: that both the metrologicalness and the healthiness occurs is not true. sent20: the overusing Minuteman occurs. sent21: the indistinguishableness happens. sent22: the offering occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heliolatry occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the countermine happens but the systematization does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the systematization does not occur.; sent9 & sent1 -> int3: the understanding does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__