the fact that there is something such that if it is not a skipper it is apetalous thing that is not a Harefoot is not correct.
sent1: the complex is apetalous if it is not a kind of a skipper. sent2: if something is not a kind of a hip-hop that it is both a Harefoot and not a heft is true. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a skipper then it is apetalous and it is a kind of a Harefoot. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not skipper it is not a Harefoot. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not kennel it is a modeling and it is unenthusiastic. sent6: there exists something such that if it skippers then it is apetalous and it is not a Harefoot. sent7: if the fact that the complex does not skipper is not false then it is apetalous and it is a Harefoot. sent8: there is something such that if it does not skipper it is apetalous. sent9: if the fact that the complex is not an orpiment is true it does confuse spadework and is not pentangular. sent10: the complex is apetalous and not a Harefoot if it is not a skipper. sent11: if the complex is a skipper then it is apetalous and it is not a kind of a Harefoot.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if the consuetudinary is not a hip-hop then it is a kind of a Harefoot that is not a heft.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a skipper it is apetalous thing that is not a Harefoot is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the complex is apetalous if it is not a kind of a skipper. sent2: if something is not a kind of a hip-hop that it is both a Harefoot and not a heft is true. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a skipper then it is apetalous and it is a kind of a Harefoot. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not skipper it is not a Harefoot. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not kennel it is a modeling and it is unenthusiastic. sent6: there exists something such that if it skippers then it is apetalous and it is not a Harefoot. sent7: if the fact that the complex does not skipper is not false then it is apetalous and it is a Harefoot. sent8: there is something such that if it does not skipper it is apetalous. sent9: if the fact that the complex is not an orpiment is true it does confuse spadework and is not pentangular. sent10: the complex is apetalous and not a Harefoot if it is not a skipper. sent11: if the complex is a skipper then it is apetalous and it is not a kind of a Harefoot. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__