the Karakalpak does diminish Indriidae and is not a triumph.
sent1: if the epiphyte is a kind of a triumph the fact that the Karakalpak is a switchboard that is a kind of a triumph does not hold. sent2: that the beachhead is a switchboard and it is pericardial hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is overhead then the beachhead is pericardial and it is a kind of a doddle. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a switchboard and it is a doddle then the epiphyte does not diminish Indriidae. sent5: the fact that the beachhead is a triumph and/or it is not pericardial is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that it does diminish Tang and it is a girlfriend. sent7: if a recall is a switchboard then the antisyphilitic is not pericardial. sent8: there are overhead things. sent9: the antisyphilitic is competitive. sent10: if the antisyphilitic is not pericardial the beachhead is pericardial. sent11: if the fact that either something is a recall or it is not a switchboard or both is not correct it is a triumph. sent12: the antisyphilitic is a nonequivalence and it is a doddle. sent13: if something that is pericardial is a doddle then the epiphyte is not a kind of a switchboard. sent14: if the antisyphilitic is a triumph the fact that the Karakalpak diminishes Indriidae but it is not a triumph does not hold. sent15: the beachhead is not a triumph. sent16: something does narrow if that it is eyeless or it directs Danish or both is wrong. sent17: the Karakalpak is pericardial. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a triumph then the Karakalpak is a recall and it is a kind of a switchboard. sent19: if the antisyphilitic recalls the fact that the Karakalpak is a triumph and is not a recalls does not hold. sent20: something is a kind of a cannibal. sent21: the fact that the Karakalpak is a kind of a switchboard and it diminishes Indriidae is correct if something is a kind of a triumph. sent22: the fact that the kiddy does recall is true. sent23: if something recalls then the beachhead is a kind of pericardial a switchboard. sent24: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Danton. sent25: the fact that the antisyphilitic is a recall and/or it is not a kind of a switchboard does not hold if the epiphyte is not a switchboard.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the beachhead is pericardial and it is a doddle.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a kind of pericardial a doddle.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the epiphyte is not a kind of a switchboard.; int3 & sent25 -> int4: the fact that the antisyphilitic is a recall and/or is not a switchboard is not right.; sent11 -> int5: the antisyphilitic is a triumph if that it does recall or it is not a switchboard or both is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antisyphilitic is a triumph.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Karakalpak does diminish Indriidae and is not a triumph. ; $context$ = sent1: if the epiphyte is a kind of a triumph the fact that the Karakalpak is a switchboard that is a kind of a triumph does not hold. sent2: that the beachhead is a switchboard and it is pericardial hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is overhead then the beachhead is pericardial and it is a kind of a doddle. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a switchboard and it is a doddle then the epiphyte does not diminish Indriidae. sent5: the fact that the beachhead is a triumph and/or it is not pericardial is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that it does diminish Tang and it is a girlfriend. sent7: if a recall is a switchboard then the antisyphilitic is not pericardial. sent8: there are overhead things. sent9: the antisyphilitic is competitive. sent10: if the antisyphilitic is not pericardial the beachhead is pericardial. sent11: if the fact that either something is a recall or it is not a switchboard or both is not correct it is a triumph. sent12: the antisyphilitic is a nonequivalence and it is a doddle. sent13: if something that is pericardial is a doddle then the epiphyte is not a kind of a switchboard. sent14: if the antisyphilitic is a triumph the fact that the Karakalpak diminishes Indriidae but it is not a triumph does not hold. sent15: the beachhead is not a triumph. sent16: something does narrow if that it is eyeless or it directs Danish or both is wrong. sent17: the Karakalpak is pericardial. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a triumph then the Karakalpak is a recall and it is a kind of a switchboard. sent19: if the antisyphilitic recalls the fact that the Karakalpak is a triumph and is not a recalls does not hold. sent20: something is a kind of a cannibal. sent21: the fact that the Karakalpak is a kind of a switchboard and it diminishes Indriidae is correct if something is a kind of a triumph. sent22: the fact that the kiddy does recall is true. sent23: if something recalls then the beachhead is a kind of pericardial a switchboard. sent24: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Danton. sent25: the fact that the antisyphilitic is a recall and/or it is not a kind of a switchboard does not hold if the epiphyte is not a switchboard. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the beachhead is pericardial and it is a doddle.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a kind of pericardial a doddle.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the epiphyte is not a kind of a switchboard.; int3 & sent25 -> int4: the fact that the antisyphilitic is a recall and/or is not a switchboard is not right.; sent11 -> int5: the antisyphilitic is a triumph if that it does recall or it is not a switchboard or both is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antisyphilitic is a triumph.; int6 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__