the Burger is sympatric.
sent1: the Burger is nonmagnetic and housekeeps. sent2: the polyethylene is sympatric. sent3: the polyethylene does not fraternize if the Burger does emulsify chinaware and is sympatric. sent4: if the Burger does fraternize and does emulsify chinaware the polyethylene is not sympatric. sent5: the fuji does not emulsify chinaware. sent6: the Burger fraternizes. sent7: the Burger does not remodel cremation. sent8: the polyethylene fraternizes. sent9: the polyethylene emulsifies chinaware. sent10: if the polyethylene does fraternize and it does emulsify chinaware then that the Burger is not sympatric is not wrong. sent11: the Burger is titular and it is influential. sent12: the chinaware is sympatric. sent13: the filling does photograph buyer and it is an accordance. sent14: that the titanium is a kind of a shingling that does fraternize is true. sent15: the joint is sympatric. sent16: the Burger is Gauguinesque. sent17: that the polyethylene does not fraternize is right if the Burger is a kind of sympatric thing that does emulsify chinaware. sent18: the Burger does not emulsify chinaware. sent19: if the polyethylene fraternizes and is sympatric the Burger does not emulsify chinaware. sent20: the Burger does not emulsify chinaware if the polyethylene is sympatric and it fraternizes. sent21: The chinaware emulsifies polyethylene. sent22: the polyethylene is not sympatric if the Burger does emulsify chinaware and fraternizes. sent23: if the polyethylene is not sympatric the Burger is sympatric.
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the polyethylene does fraternize and emulsifies chinaware.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Burger is sympatric.
$hypothesis$ = the Burger is sympatric. ; $context$ = sent1: the Burger is nonmagnetic and housekeeps. sent2: the polyethylene is sympatric. sent3: the polyethylene does not fraternize if the Burger does emulsify chinaware and is sympatric. sent4: if the Burger does fraternize and does emulsify chinaware the polyethylene is not sympatric. sent5: the fuji does not emulsify chinaware. sent6: the Burger fraternizes. sent7: the Burger does not remodel cremation. sent8: the polyethylene fraternizes. sent9: the polyethylene emulsifies chinaware. sent10: if the polyethylene does fraternize and it does emulsify chinaware then that the Burger is not sympatric is not wrong. sent11: the Burger is titular and it is influential. sent12: the chinaware is sympatric. sent13: the filling does photograph buyer and it is an accordance. sent14: that the titanium is a kind of a shingling that does fraternize is true. sent15: the joint is sympatric. sent16: the Burger is Gauguinesque. sent17: that the polyethylene does not fraternize is right if the Burger is a kind of sympatric thing that does emulsify chinaware. sent18: the Burger does not emulsify chinaware. sent19: if the polyethylene fraternizes and is sympatric the Burger does not emulsify chinaware. sent20: the Burger does not emulsify chinaware if the polyethylene is sympatric and it fraternizes. sent21: The chinaware emulsifies polyethylene. sent22: the polyethylene is not sympatric if the Burger does emulsify chinaware and fraternizes. sent23: if the polyethylene is not sympatric the Burger is sympatric. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the polyethylene does fraternize and emulsifies chinaware.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__