that the shape is a kitchenware and does not strengthen Anshar does not hold.
sent1: if the inoculator is a bitter-bark then that the belching is not pteridological and it is not apetalous is not correct. sent2: the fact that the fact that the belching is a kind of pteridological thing that is not apetalous hold is not right if the inoculator is a bitter-bark. sent3: the fact that the cleat is not a disproof but it is a Bulnesia is not correct. sent4: if something is a kind of a biting then it is a Hippo. sent5: if something is not immunosuppressive it does not strengthen Anshar. sent6: that the belching is not pteridological and is apetalous is wrong. sent7: that the cleat is a disproof but it is not a Bulnesia is wrong. sent8: if the fact that the cleat is not a disproof and not a Bulnesia is incorrect then the pruning does bite. sent9: the fact that the shape does not strengthen Anshar is true. sent10: something that is not a kind of a bitter-bark is a disproof and is not immunosuppressive. sent11: the shape does not strengthen Anshar if it is not immunosuppressive. sent12: there is nothing such that it is not a kind of a disproof and is not a Bulnesia. sent13: if that the belching is not pteridological and it is not apetalous does not hold the shape is not immunosuppressive. sent14: if the pruning is not a biting the fact that the shape is a kitchenware but it does not strengthen Anshar is incorrect. sent15: if the inoculator is a bitter-bark then the fact that the belching is non-pteridological thing that is apetalous is wrong. sent16: there exists nothing such that it is not a disproof and it is a Bulnesia. sent17: there exists nothing that is a disproof and not a Bulnesia. sent18: if something is not a kind of a pack it does decoct. sent19: something is a kind of a kitchenware that does not strengthen Anshar if it is not immunosuppressive. sent20: the fact that that something is a kitchenware and does not strengthen Anshar is not incorrect does not hold if it does not bite. sent21: the inoculator is a bitter-bark if the pruning is a kind of a Hippo. sent22: the fact that the belching is pteridological but it is non-apetalous is wrong.
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the cleat is not a kind of a disproof and it is not a Bulnesia is not right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the pruning does bite.; sent4 -> int3: if the pruning is a biting then that it is a Hippo hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pruning is a kind of a Hippo.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the inoculator is a kind of a bitter-bark.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: that the belching is not pteridological and it is not apetalous is not true.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the shape is not immunosuppressive.; sent19 -> int8: if the shape is not immunosuppressive it is a kind of a kitchenware and does not strengthen Anshar.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the shape is a kind of a kitchenware but it does not strengthen Anshar is not correct.
sent20 -> int9: the fact that the shape is a kitchenware but it does not strengthen Anshar is false if it is not a biting.;
$hypothesis$ = that the shape is a kitchenware and does not strengthen Anshar does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the inoculator is a bitter-bark then that the belching is not pteridological and it is not apetalous is not correct. sent2: the fact that the fact that the belching is a kind of pteridological thing that is not apetalous hold is not right if the inoculator is a bitter-bark. sent3: the fact that the cleat is not a disproof but it is a Bulnesia is not correct. sent4: if something is a kind of a biting then it is a Hippo. sent5: if something is not immunosuppressive it does not strengthen Anshar. sent6: that the belching is not pteridological and is apetalous is wrong. sent7: that the cleat is a disproof but it is not a Bulnesia is wrong. sent8: if the fact that the cleat is not a disproof and not a Bulnesia is incorrect then the pruning does bite. sent9: the fact that the shape does not strengthen Anshar is true. sent10: something that is not a kind of a bitter-bark is a disproof and is not immunosuppressive. sent11: the shape does not strengthen Anshar if it is not immunosuppressive. sent12: there is nothing such that it is not a kind of a disproof and is not a Bulnesia. sent13: if that the belching is not pteridological and it is not apetalous does not hold the shape is not immunosuppressive. sent14: if the pruning is not a biting the fact that the shape is a kitchenware but it does not strengthen Anshar is incorrect. sent15: if the inoculator is a bitter-bark then the fact that the belching is non-pteridological thing that is apetalous is wrong. sent16: there exists nothing such that it is not a disproof and it is a Bulnesia. sent17: there exists nothing that is a disproof and not a Bulnesia. sent18: if something is not a kind of a pack it does decoct. sent19: something is a kind of a kitchenware that does not strengthen Anshar if it is not immunosuppressive. sent20: the fact that that something is a kitchenware and does not strengthen Anshar is not incorrect does not hold if it does not bite. sent21: the inoculator is a bitter-bark if the pruning is a kind of a Hippo. sent22: the fact that the belching is pteridological but it is non-apetalous is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the cleat is not a kind of a disproof and it is not a Bulnesia is not right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the pruning does bite.; sent4 -> int3: if the pruning is a biting then that it is a Hippo hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pruning is a kind of a Hippo.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the inoculator is a kind of a bitter-bark.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: that the belching is not pteridological and it is not apetalous is not true.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the shape is not immunosuppressive.; sent19 -> int8: if the shape is not immunosuppressive it is a kind of a kitchenware and does not strengthen Anshar.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__