the adenosine does not hear Gerbert and is not a souffle.
sent1: the fact that the adenosine does miscarry Al-hakim is correct. sent2: if a dreadlock does Frenchify cheval-de-frise then the fact that it does not hear Gerbert is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it does not Frenchify thunderstorm. sent4: the Egyptologist does not hear Gerbert and it is not a kind of a souffle. sent5: the region does not hear Gerbert and it does not miscarry transitive. sent6: if that the Marylander is a fraise and/or it Frenchifies provost is wrong then it is not a acridity. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not Frenchify thunderstorm then that the propane is Sisyphean thing that is not a spinal is not right. sent8: something does Frenchify cheval-de-frise if it does not hear Gerbert and is not a souffle. sent9: the region is not a curassow and/or does miscarry transitive. sent10: if there exists something such that it does miscarry transitive then the adenosine is a dreadlock. sent11: the blunderbuss does not miscarry transitive. sent12: the Marylander is not a fraise. sent13: everything does miscarry Al-hakim. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not Sisyphean that the fact that the refreshment miscarries transitive and is not a kind of a curassow is false is correct. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is Sisyphean and it is not spinal is not correct the spiv is not Sisyphean. sent16: that if either something is not a kind of a curassow or it miscarries transitive or both the adenosine is a dreadlock is correct. sent17: the fact that the adenosine Frenchifies cheval-de-frise hold if the Marylander is not a acridity. sent18: the Marylander is an inpatient and a Daniel. sent19: the adenosine is not a souffle if it is a kind of cortico-hypothalamic thing that miscarries Al-hakim. sent20: if something does not miscarry Al-hakim then the region is a dreadlock and is a acridity. sent21: if the Marylander does Frenchify cheval-de-frise that the adenosine does not hear Gerbert and it is not a kind of a souffle does not hold. sent22: there exists something such that it is a curassow and/or it miscarries transitive. sent23: if that the region Frenchifies cheval-de-frise or miscarries transitive or both is not true then the fact that it is not a curassow is not incorrect. sent24: the fact that the Marylander is a kind of a fraise and/or does Frenchify provost does not hold. sent25: if that the refreshment miscarries transitive but it is not a curassow is not correct the garnish is cortico-hypothalamic. sent26: everything is cortico-hypothalamic and it miscarries Al-hakim.
sent6 & sent24 -> int1: the Marylander is not a acridity.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the adenosine does Frenchify cheval-de-frise.; sent9 -> int3: either something is not a curassow or it does miscarry transitive or both.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the adenosine is a dreadlock.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the adenosine is a dreadlock and Frenchifies cheval-de-frise.; sent2 -> int6: if the adenosine is a dreadlock and it does Frenchify cheval-de-frise then it does not hear Gerbert.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the adenosine does not hear Gerbert.; sent26 -> int8: the adenosine is cortico-hypothalamic and it does miscarry Al-hakim.; sent19 & int8 -> int9: the adenosine is not a souffle.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the adenosine does not hear Gerbert and is not a kind of a souffle is not correct.
sent3 & sent7 -> int10: the fact that the propane is Sisyphean but it is not spinal is not true.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it is both Sisyphean and not a spinal is not true.; int11 & sent15 -> int12: the spiv is not Sisyphean.; int12 -> int13: something is not Sisyphean.; int13 & sent14 -> int14: the fact that the refreshment miscarries transitive but it is not a curassow is wrong.; sent25 & int14 -> int15: the garnish is cortico-hypothalamic.; int15 -> int16: something is not non-cortico-hypothalamic.;
$hypothesis$ = the adenosine does not hear Gerbert and is not a souffle. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the adenosine does miscarry Al-hakim is correct. sent2: if a dreadlock does Frenchify cheval-de-frise then the fact that it does not hear Gerbert is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it does not Frenchify thunderstorm. sent4: the Egyptologist does not hear Gerbert and it is not a kind of a souffle. sent5: the region does not hear Gerbert and it does not miscarry transitive. sent6: if that the Marylander is a fraise and/or it Frenchifies provost is wrong then it is not a acridity. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not Frenchify thunderstorm then that the propane is Sisyphean thing that is not a spinal is not right. sent8: something does Frenchify cheval-de-frise if it does not hear Gerbert and is not a souffle. sent9: the region is not a curassow and/or does miscarry transitive. sent10: if there exists something such that it does miscarry transitive then the adenosine is a dreadlock. sent11: the blunderbuss does not miscarry transitive. sent12: the Marylander is not a fraise. sent13: everything does miscarry Al-hakim. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not Sisyphean that the fact that the refreshment miscarries transitive and is not a kind of a curassow is false is correct. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is Sisyphean and it is not spinal is not correct the spiv is not Sisyphean. sent16: that if either something is not a kind of a curassow or it miscarries transitive or both the adenosine is a dreadlock is correct. sent17: the fact that the adenosine Frenchifies cheval-de-frise hold if the Marylander is not a acridity. sent18: the Marylander is an inpatient and a Daniel. sent19: the adenosine is not a souffle if it is a kind of cortico-hypothalamic thing that miscarries Al-hakim. sent20: if something does not miscarry Al-hakim then the region is a dreadlock and is a acridity. sent21: if the Marylander does Frenchify cheval-de-frise that the adenosine does not hear Gerbert and it is not a kind of a souffle does not hold. sent22: there exists something such that it is a curassow and/or it miscarries transitive. sent23: if that the region Frenchifies cheval-de-frise or miscarries transitive or both is not true then the fact that it is not a curassow is not incorrect. sent24: the fact that the Marylander is a kind of a fraise and/or does Frenchify provost does not hold. sent25: if that the refreshment miscarries transitive but it is not a curassow is not correct the garnish is cortico-hypothalamic. sent26: everything is cortico-hypothalamic and it miscarries Al-hakim. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent24 -> int1: the Marylander is not a acridity.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the adenosine does Frenchify cheval-de-frise.; sent9 -> int3: either something is not a curassow or it does miscarry transitive or both.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the adenosine is a dreadlock.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the adenosine is a dreadlock and Frenchifies cheval-de-frise.; sent2 -> int6: if the adenosine is a dreadlock and it does Frenchify cheval-de-frise then it does not hear Gerbert.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the adenosine does not hear Gerbert.; sent26 -> int8: the adenosine is cortico-hypothalamic and it does miscarry Al-hakim.; sent19 & int8 -> int9: the adenosine is not a souffle.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__