that the calorimetry occurs if the Baptisticness occurs is not true.
sent1: that the pace and/or the effortfulness happens is not wrong. sent2: the roiling does not occur if either the supersedure or the neotenicness or both occurs. sent3: if that the roiling does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the Baptisticness does not occur is not correct. sent4: if the effortfulness occurs the supersedure occurs. sent5: the supersedure occurs if the pacing occurs. sent6: the Baptisticness does not occur if the roiling does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur. sent7: that the roiling does not occur and the calorimetry happens prevents the Baptisticness.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Baptisticness occurs.; sent1 & sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the supersedure occurs.; int1 -> int2: that the supersedure or the neotenicness or both happens is not wrong.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the roiling does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calorimetry does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the roiling does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the Baptisticness does not occur is true.; assump2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the calorimetry occurs.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the calorimetry occurs if the Baptisticness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pace and/or the effortfulness happens is not wrong. sent2: the roiling does not occur if either the supersedure or the neotenicness or both occurs. sent3: if that the roiling does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the Baptisticness does not occur is not correct. sent4: if the effortfulness occurs the supersedure occurs. sent5: the supersedure occurs if the pacing occurs. sent6: the Baptisticness does not occur if the roiling does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur. sent7: that the roiling does not occur and the calorimetry happens prevents the Baptisticness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Baptisticness occurs.; sent1 & sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the supersedure occurs.; int1 -> int2: that the supersedure or the neotenicness or both happens is not wrong.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the roiling does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calorimetry does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the roiling does not occur and the calorimetry does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the Baptisticness does not occur is true.; assump2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the calorimetry occurs.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__