not the dogmatizing cassocked but the flip-flop occurs.
sent1: the unshapeliness does not occur and the culdoscopy does not occur. sent2: the testing does not occur if the knot does not occur. sent3: the stapling till does not occur and the acquainting Federal does not occur. sent4: that the stapling till does not occur and the acquainting Federal does not occur results in that the dogmatizing adjacency does not occur. sent5: that the flip-flop and the chuting happens is caused by that the dogmatizing adjacency does not occur. sent6: both the chlorination and the bunking overage occurs. sent7: that the stapling Haematoxylum happens and the knotting occurs causes that the chlorination does not occur. sent8: the otoplasty does not occur. sent9: the vagileness does not occur and the dogmatizing comber does not occur. sent10: that the unshapeliness does not occur and the culdoscopy does not occur causes that the stapling Haematoxylum happens. sent11: that the dogmatizing cassocked does not occur is right if the testing does not occur.
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the stapling Haematoxylum happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the knotting happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the stapling Haematoxylum and the knot happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the chlorination does not occur.; sent6 -> int4: the chlorination occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the knotting does not occur.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the test does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the dogmatizing cassocked does not occur.; sent4 & sent3 -> int9: the dogmatizing adjacency does not occur.; sent5 & int9 -> int10: both the flip-flop and the chuting occurs.; int10 -> int11: the flip-flop occurs.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = not the dogmatizing cassocked but the flip-flop occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the unshapeliness does not occur and the culdoscopy does not occur. sent2: the testing does not occur if the knot does not occur. sent3: the stapling till does not occur and the acquainting Federal does not occur. sent4: that the stapling till does not occur and the acquainting Federal does not occur results in that the dogmatizing adjacency does not occur. sent5: that the flip-flop and the chuting happens is caused by that the dogmatizing adjacency does not occur. sent6: both the chlorination and the bunking overage occurs. sent7: that the stapling Haematoxylum happens and the knotting occurs causes that the chlorination does not occur. sent8: the otoplasty does not occur. sent9: the vagileness does not occur and the dogmatizing comber does not occur. sent10: that the unshapeliness does not occur and the culdoscopy does not occur causes that the stapling Haematoxylum happens. sent11: that the dogmatizing cassocked does not occur is right if the testing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the stapling Haematoxylum happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the knotting happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the stapling Haematoxylum and the knot happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the chlorination does not occur.; sent6 -> int4: the chlorination occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the knotting does not occur.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the test does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the dogmatizing cassocked does not occur.; sent4 & sent3 -> int9: the dogmatizing adjacency does not occur.; sent5 & int9 -> int10: both the flip-flop and the chuting occurs.; int10 -> int11: the flip-flop occurs.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__