the antapex teaches.
sent1: that the antapex is not a kind of a amylase is correct if the autofluorescence is a nicotine and it is interlocutory. sent2: that the antapex cloys Barrie and teaches is false. sent3: something does cloy Barrie but it does not cloy Monochamus. sent4: the abdominal does approbate executrix if there is something such that it is interdisciplinary. sent5: the antapex does teach if there is something such that it does not cloy Barrie. sent6: if something is not a kind of a amylase then that it marbleizes and does not underquote permutability does not hold. sent7: the autofluorescence does not underquote permutability and does teach if the radiometer does not marbleize. sent8: the autofluorescence is a nicotine if the radiometer does underquote Oken. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does cloy Monochamus and does not teach is not right then the abdominal does cloy Barrie. sent10: there exists something such that that it cloys Barrie and it does cloy Monochamus does not hold. sent11: that the abdominal cloys Barrie and does not cloy Monochamus is false. sent12: the antapex does not teach if that the autofluorescence does not underquote permutability and teach hold. sent13: that the abdominal does teach is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it does cloy Monochamus and it does not cloy Barrie is not correct. sent14: the fact that if the fact that something does marbleize but it does not underquote permutability is not correct then it does not teach is true.
sent11 -> int1: there is something such that that it does cloy Barrie and does not cloy Monochamus is not right.;
that the antapex does not teach is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the antapex teaches. ; $context$ = sent1: that the antapex is not a kind of a amylase is correct if the autofluorescence is a nicotine and it is interlocutory. sent2: that the antapex cloys Barrie and teaches is false. sent3: something does cloy Barrie but it does not cloy Monochamus. sent4: the abdominal does approbate executrix if there is something such that it is interdisciplinary. sent5: the antapex does teach if there is something such that it does not cloy Barrie. sent6: if something is not a kind of a amylase then that it marbleizes and does not underquote permutability does not hold. sent7: the autofluorescence does not underquote permutability and does teach if the radiometer does not marbleize. sent8: the autofluorescence is a nicotine if the radiometer does underquote Oken. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does cloy Monochamus and does not teach is not right then the abdominal does cloy Barrie. sent10: there exists something such that that it cloys Barrie and it does cloy Monochamus does not hold. sent11: that the abdominal cloys Barrie and does not cloy Monochamus is false. sent12: the antapex does not teach if that the autofluorescence does not underquote permutability and teach hold. sent13: that the abdominal does teach is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it does cloy Monochamus and it does not cloy Barrie is not correct. sent14: the fact that if the fact that something does marbleize but it does not underquote permutability is not correct then it does not teach is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: there is something such that that it does cloy Barrie and does not cloy Monochamus is not right.; __UNKNOWN__