the wormcast does not exclaim Knoxville.
sent1: the fact that the incompetent is not providential is not incorrect if there is something such that that it is both providential and unidimensional is wrong. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not providential and it is not unidimensional then the groundberry does total. sent3: if the ass is providential the tensor is a kind of providential thing that is not unidimensional. sent4: if the fact that something is not providential and does not exclaim Knoxville is not true then it exclaim Knoxville. sent5: if the groundberry totals and it is a litigant then that the wormcast does not exclaim Knoxville is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that something is providential and it is unidimensional is not true if it is not a litigant. sent7: everything does pin nodule and is a kind of a litigant. sent8: the ass is providential if it pins Laffer. sent9: The Laffer pins ass.
sent7 -> int1: the groundberry pins nodule and it is a litigant.; int1 -> int2: the groundberry is a kind of a litigant.;
the wormcast does exclaim Knoxville.
sent4 -> int3: if that that the wormcast is non-providential and it does not exclaim Knoxville does not hold hold it exclaim Knoxville.;
$hypothesis$ = the wormcast does not exclaim Knoxville. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the incompetent is not providential is not incorrect if there is something such that that it is both providential and unidimensional is wrong. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not providential and it is not unidimensional then the groundberry does total. sent3: if the ass is providential the tensor is a kind of providential thing that is not unidimensional. sent4: if the fact that something is not providential and does not exclaim Knoxville is not true then it exclaim Knoxville. sent5: if the groundberry totals and it is a litigant then that the wormcast does not exclaim Knoxville is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that something is providential and it is unidimensional is not true if it is not a litigant. sent7: everything does pin nodule and is a kind of a litigant. sent8: the ass is providential if it pins Laffer. sent9: The Laffer pins ass. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the groundberry pins nodule and it is a litigant.; int1 -> int2: the groundberry is a kind of a litigant.; __UNKNOWN__