the hushpuppy is not clinker-built and is not a contour.
sent1: the empty pinks empty if the scrapheap is not a notoriety. sent2: that the scrapheap is a kind of a ulteriority and it pinks empty is incorrect. sent3: that if there exists something such that it is not ununderstood then the bacca is not a Charleston and/or it is a geyser hold. sent4: if the fact that the brine does disentangle and does bayonet carpenter is false it is not pro. sent5: if the entrepot is biological then the bacca does name Edward and is not a kind of a Charleston. sent6: if that the hushpuppy does not pink empty and geysers is not true then it is a kind of an old. sent7: the bacca does Charleston but it is not ununderstood if the empty is old. sent8: there exists something such that it is not ununderstood. sent9: if the bacca Charlestons and it does pink empty then the hushpuppy does not contour. sent10: if the hushpuppy is a pro and pinks empty then the brine does not contour. sent11: the entrepot is not a contour. sent12: the fact that the hushpuppy is not ununderstood is not wrong. sent13: the fact that the hushpuppy does name Edward and is not ununderstood is not true if the empty is not non-pro. sent14: if that the empty is biological a ulteriority is incorrect it does not name Edward. sent15: something is not a contour if it is not a geyser. sent16: the empty does not bayonet carpenter if the brine is not an old. sent17: something is not a kind of a Charleston if the fact that it does name Edward and it is not ununderstood is not true. sent18: the hushpuppy is non-ununderstood if it is not clinker-built. sent19: if the fact that the empty does not pink empty and is not old does not hold the fact that the hushpuppy is not an old hold. sent20: the hushpuppy is not a contour. sent21: the empty does not geyser if the fact that it is biological and it is a ulteriority does not hold. sent22: that either the empty does geyser or it does not pink empty or both is correct if the bacca is a Charleston. sent23: the hushpuppy is not clinker-built and is not a kind of a contour if the entrepot does not name Edward. sent24: if something is a kind of an old then the fact that it is not clinker-built and does not contour is not right. sent25: the fact that something does not pink empty but it is a geyser is incorrect if it does not Charleston. sent26: if the brine is not pro then the scrapheap pinks empty or it is not a notoriety or both. sent27: the fact that the empty pinks empty is not wrong if that the scrapheap pinks empty is not false. sent28: something does not pink empty if it is not a geyser. sent29: if the empty is not an old then that it is biological and it is a ulteriority is false. sent30: if that the bacca is a Charleston and not ununderstood is right then the entrepot does not name Edward.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the empty is not old.; sent29 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the empty is biological and is a ulteriority does not hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the empty does not geyser.; sent28 -> int3: if the empty does not geyser then it does not pink empty.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the empty does not pink empty.;
the fact that the hushpuppy is non-clinker-built thing that does not contour is not correct.
sent24 -> int5: the fact that the hushpuppy is non-clinker-built thing that does not contour is false if it is a kind of an old.; sent25 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the hushpuppy does not pink empty and is a geyser is not wrong is wrong if the fact that it does not Charleston is right.; sent17 -> int7: the hushpuppy is not a Charleston if that it names Edward and is not ununderstood is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the hushpuppy is not clinker-built and is not a contour. ; $context$ = sent1: the empty pinks empty if the scrapheap is not a notoriety. sent2: that the scrapheap is a kind of a ulteriority and it pinks empty is incorrect. sent3: that if there exists something such that it is not ununderstood then the bacca is not a Charleston and/or it is a geyser hold. sent4: if the fact that the brine does disentangle and does bayonet carpenter is false it is not pro. sent5: if the entrepot is biological then the bacca does name Edward and is not a kind of a Charleston. sent6: if that the hushpuppy does not pink empty and geysers is not true then it is a kind of an old. sent7: the bacca does Charleston but it is not ununderstood if the empty is old. sent8: there exists something such that it is not ununderstood. sent9: if the bacca Charlestons and it does pink empty then the hushpuppy does not contour. sent10: if the hushpuppy is a pro and pinks empty then the brine does not contour. sent11: the entrepot is not a contour. sent12: the fact that the hushpuppy is not ununderstood is not wrong. sent13: the fact that the hushpuppy does name Edward and is not ununderstood is not true if the empty is not non-pro. sent14: if that the empty is biological a ulteriority is incorrect it does not name Edward. sent15: something is not a contour if it is not a geyser. sent16: the empty does not bayonet carpenter if the brine is not an old. sent17: something is not a kind of a Charleston if the fact that it does name Edward and it is not ununderstood is not true. sent18: the hushpuppy is non-ununderstood if it is not clinker-built. sent19: if the fact that the empty does not pink empty and is not old does not hold the fact that the hushpuppy is not an old hold. sent20: the hushpuppy is not a contour. sent21: the empty does not geyser if the fact that it is biological and it is a ulteriority does not hold. sent22: that either the empty does geyser or it does not pink empty or both is correct if the bacca is a Charleston. sent23: the hushpuppy is not clinker-built and is not a kind of a contour if the entrepot does not name Edward. sent24: if something is a kind of an old then the fact that it is not clinker-built and does not contour is not right. sent25: the fact that something does not pink empty but it is a geyser is incorrect if it does not Charleston. sent26: if the brine is not pro then the scrapheap pinks empty or it is not a notoriety or both. sent27: the fact that the empty pinks empty is not wrong if that the scrapheap pinks empty is not false. sent28: something does not pink empty if it is not a geyser. sent29: if the empty is not an old then that it is biological and it is a ulteriority is false. sent30: if that the bacca is a Charleston and not ununderstood is right then the entrepot does not name Edward. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the empty is not old.; sent29 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the empty is biological and is a ulteriority does not hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the empty does not geyser.; sent28 -> int3: if the empty does not geyser then it does not pink empty.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the empty does not pink empty.; __UNKNOWN__