the adventurer is not politic.
sent1: the reticle does not consolidate disembarrassment. sent2: the kasha is not hydrometric if there exists something such that that it is nonrepetitive and it does not alternate does not hold. sent3: if there is something such that it is alternate then the fact that the kasha is not hydrometric is right. sent4: the adventurer is not politic if the fact that that either the reticle consolidates disembarrassment or it is hydrometric or both does not hold is not false. sent5: if the kasha is not centralist that the limekiln is a beneficiation and/or alternate does not hold. sent6: the chalcidfly is a Ahura but it does not sniff Polypedatidae. sent7: the fact that the limekiln is both nonrepetitive and alternate is incorrect if it is centralist. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of nonrepetitive thing that alternates is false. sent9: the fact that the limekiln is nonrepetitive and is not alternate is not correct if it is centralist. sent10: if the kasha is not hydrometric the fact that the reticle either does consolidate disembarrassment or is hydrometric or both does not hold. sent11: if something is a Ahura and does not sniff Polypedatidae then the limekiln is centralist. sent12: that something is a Ahura is true. sent13: something is nonrepetitive but not alternate.
sent6 -> int1: there is something such that it is a Ahura and does not sniff Polypedatidae.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the limekiln is centralist.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the limekiln is nonrepetitive but it does not alternate hold is not true.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is nonrepetitive and is not alternate does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the kasha is not hydrometric.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: that the reticle consolidates disembarrassment or it is hydrometric or both is incorrect.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the limekiln is a beneficiation or it alternates or both does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the adventurer is not politic. ; $context$ = sent1: the reticle does not consolidate disembarrassment. sent2: the kasha is not hydrometric if there exists something such that that it is nonrepetitive and it does not alternate does not hold. sent3: if there is something such that it is alternate then the fact that the kasha is not hydrometric is right. sent4: the adventurer is not politic if the fact that that either the reticle consolidates disembarrassment or it is hydrometric or both does not hold is not false. sent5: if the kasha is not centralist that the limekiln is a beneficiation and/or alternate does not hold. sent6: the chalcidfly is a Ahura but it does not sniff Polypedatidae. sent7: the fact that the limekiln is both nonrepetitive and alternate is incorrect if it is centralist. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of nonrepetitive thing that alternates is false. sent9: the fact that the limekiln is nonrepetitive and is not alternate is not correct if it is centralist. sent10: if the kasha is not hydrometric the fact that the reticle either does consolidate disembarrassment or is hydrometric or both does not hold. sent11: if something is a Ahura and does not sniff Polypedatidae then the limekiln is centralist. sent12: that something is a Ahura is true. sent13: something is nonrepetitive but not alternate. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: there is something such that it is a Ahura and does not sniff Polypedatidae.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the limekiln is centralist.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the limekiln is nonrepetitive but it does not alternate hold is not true.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is nonrepetitive and is not alternate does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the kasha is not hydrometric.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: that the reticle consolidates disembarrassment or it is hydrometric or both is incorrect.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__