the saying does not occur.
sent1: the pegging animator does not occur. sent2: if the disownment happens the intractableness occurs. sent3: that the surfacing does not occur is prevented by that the rewarding redtail occurs. sent4: the salaam does not occur. sent5: that the contusion happens is not false. sent6: if the fact that not the securing but the passionlessness occurs is not true then the securing happens. sent7: the rummaging Persian does not occur but the susurration happens. sent8: the fact that the say but not the surfacing happens is true if the securing happens. sent9: the saying does not occur if the acquiescence and the surfacing happens. sent10: the fact that the plication does not occur is right if not the untying but the cockfighting occurs. sent11: the fact that both the diabeticness and the rewarding Geum happens hold. sent12: the mucinoidness does not occur. sent13: if that that the rewarding redtail happens and the efflorescence does not occur is not correct is not wrong the rewarding redtail does not occur. sent14: the fact that the fact that not the secureness but the passionlessness happens hold is incorrect if the plication does not occur. sent15: the perinealness does not occur. sent16: the rummaging SPF occurs. sent17: that both the infection and the pegging fiancee happens is true. sent18: the turnaround does not occur. sent19: that the turnaround occurs prevents that the say does not occur. sent20: the pegging Malus occurs and the acquiescence occurs if the rewarding redtail does not occur. sent21: if the pegging Klamath happens the fact that the rewarding redtail happens but the efflorescence does not occur is not correct. sent22: the turnaround does not occur but the acquiescence occurs. sent23: the rewarding redtail happens.
sent22 -> int1: the acquiescence happens.; sent3 & sent23 -> int2: the surfacing occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the acquiescence and the surfacing happens is true.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the channelizing and the pegging Malus occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the saying does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the pegging animator does not occur. sent2: if the disownment happens the intractableness occurs. sent3: that the surfacing does not occur is prevented by that the rewarding redtail occurs. sent4: the salaam does not occur. sent5: that the contusion happens is not false. sent6: if the fact that not the securing but the passionlessness occurs is not true then the securing happens. sent7: the rummaging Persian does not occur but the susurration happens. sent8: the fact that the say but not the surfacing happens is true if the securing happens. sent9: the saying does not occur if the acquiescence and the surfacing happens. sent10: the fact that the plication does not occur is right if not the untying but the cockfighting occurs. sent11: the fact that both the diabeticness and the rewarding Geum happens hold. sent12: the mucinoidness does not occur. sent13: if that that the rewarding redtail happens and the efflorescence does not occur is not correct is not wrong the rewarding redtail does not occur. sent14: the fact that the fact that not the secureness but the passionlessness happens hold is incorrect if the plication does not occur. sent15: the perinealness does not occur. sent16: the rummaging SPF occurs. sent17: that both the infection and the pegging fiancee happens is true. sent18: the turnaround does not occur. sent19: that the turnaround occurs prevents that the say does not occur. sent20: the pegging Malus occurs and the acquiescence occurs if the rewarding redtail does not occur. sent21: if the pegging Klamath happens the fact that the rewarding redtail happens but the efflorescence does not occur is not correct. sent22: the turnaround does not occur but the acquiescence occurs. sent23: the rewarding redtail happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: the acquiescence happens.; sent3 & sent23 -> int2: the surfacing occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the acquiescence and the surfacing happens is true.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__