the peculiarity is a Choloepus.
sent1: if that something is not vulvar but it does squawk Orinoco does not hold then it is not a Choloepus. sent2: the foothold does not squawk Orinoco. sent3: the lally is not vulvar if it does treat Mesoamerican. sent4: the lally does squawk Orinoco if the peculiarity is vulvar. sent5: the fact that the artifact is a flatulence and it is a Choloepus is not right. sent6: if that the lally is a kind of non-vulvar thing that is a kind of a Choloepus is not right it does not squawk Orinoco. sent7: the peculiarity is enzymatic if the foothold does squawk Orinoco. sent8: the foothold is not enzymatic if that that it is a kind of a hyphen and it does not treat Mesoamerican hold is not right. sent9: the fact that the lally does not squawk Orinoco is true. sent10: something is not enzymatic if it is vulvar. sent11: that the foothold is vulvar is not false if the lally does treat Mesoamerican. sent12: if the peculiarity is not non-enzymatic then it is not vulvar. sent13: if the lally is not vulvar that the peculiarity is not vulvar and does squawk Orinoco is false. sent14: the fact that the peculiarity is not a hyphen and is a Choloepus does not hold if that the foothold is not a kind of a hyphen hold. sent15: if the fact that the foothold is not enzymatic but it is vulvar does not hold then it is not a kind of a Choloepus. sent16: the foothold is enzymatic if the fact that the lally is vulvar is not false. sent17: that the foothold squawks Orinoco and it is a hyphen does not hold. sent18: the fact that the fact that the foothold is not vulvar but it is a kind of a hyphen hold is incorrect if the lally is not vulvar. sent19: the fact that the foothold is a hyphen but it does not treat Mesoamerican is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lally is vulvar.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the foothold is enzymatic.; sent8 & sent19 -> int2: the foothold is not enzymatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lally is not vulvar.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the peculiarity is a kind of non-vulvar thing that does squawk Orinoco is correct is incorrect.; sent1 -> int6: the peculiarity is not a kind of a Choloepus if that it is non-vulvar thing that squawks Orinoco is incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the peculiarity is a Choloepus. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not vulvar but it does squawk Orinoco does not hold then it is not a Choloepus. sent2: the foothold does not squawk Orinoco. sent3: the lally is not vulvar if it does treat Mesoamerican. sent4: the lally does squawk Orinoco if the peculiarity is vulvar. sent5: the fact that the artifact is a flatulence and it is a Choloepus is not right. sent6: if that the lally is a kind of non-vulvar thing that is a kind of a Choloepus is not right it does not squawk Orinoco. sent7: the peculiarity is enzymatic if the foothold does squawk Orinoco. sent8: the foothold is not enzymatic if that that it is a kind of a hyphen and it does not treat Mesoamerican hold is not right. sent9: the fact that the lally does not squawk Orinoco is true. sent10: something is not enzymatic if it is vulvar. sent11: that the foothold is vulvar is not false if the lally does treat Mesoamerican. sent12: if the peculiarity is not non-enzymatic then it is not vulvar. sent13: if the lally is not vulvar that the peculiarity is not vulvar and does squawk Orinoco is false. sent14: the fact that the peculiarity is not a hyphen and is a Choloepus does not hold if that the foothold is not a kind of a hyphen hold. sent15: if the fact that the foothold is not enzymatic but it is vulvar does not hold then it is not a kind of a Choloepus. sent16: the foothold is enzymatic if the fact that the lally is vulvar is not false. sent17: that the foothold squawks Orinoco and it is a hyphen does not hold. sent18: the fact that the fact that the foothold is not vulvar but it is a kind of a hyphen hold is incorrect if the lally is not vulvar. sent19: the fact that the foothold is a hyphen but it does not treat Mesoamerican is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lally is vulvar.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the foothold is enzymatic.; sent8 & sent19 -> int2: the foothold is not enzymatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lally is not vulvar.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the peculiarity is a kind of non-vulvar thing that does squawk Orinoco is correct is incorrect.; sent1 -> int6: the peculiarity is not a kind of a Choloepus if that it is non-vulvar thing that squawks Orinoco is incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__