the reach is an equality.
sent1: that the Orangeman does not bumble but it is synonymous is not true. sent2: the Orangeman is not an adjustment. sent3: the fact that the reach does commutate pangolin is correct. sent4: the sights is a acetyl. sent5: if the yogurt is a kind of a acetyl the reach is Hebridean but it is not a acetyl. sent6: the Orangeman is an adjustment if the fact that it does not bumble and is not synonymous is wrong. sent7: the reach is not a acetyl if the yogurt is a acetyl. sent8: the fact that the Orangeman does bumble and is not synonymous is false. sent9: that the Orangeman does commutate pangolin is true if it bumbles and is not synonymous. sent10: the reach is an equality if it is a kind of a census and it is not a acetyl. sent11: the Orangeman commutates pangolin if it does not bumble and is not synonymous. sent12: the Orangeman does not commutate pangolin if that the yogurt is an adjustment and it does commutate pangolin is incorrect. sent13: the Orangeman commutates pangolin if it does not bumble and is synonymous. sent14: the reach is not a kind of a acetyl. sent15: if the reach is a census that is a kind of a acetyl then it is a kind of an equality. sent16: if the yogurt is a acetyl the reach is a census but not a acetyl. sent17: the pangolin is an equality if something is an equality or it does not commutate pangolin or both. sent18: if the yogurt is Hebridean then it is a kind of a acetyl.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Orangeman does not bumble and is not synonymous does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the Orangeman is an adjustment.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Orangeman does not bumble and it is not synonymous.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the Orangeman does commutate pangolin is right.;
that the pangolin is a kind of an equality hold.
$hypothesis$ = the reach is an equality. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Orangeman does not bumble but it is synonymous is not true. sent2: the Orangeman is not an adjustment. sent3: the fact that the reach does commutate pangolin is correct. sent4: the sights is a acetyl. sent5: if the yogurt is a kind of a acetyl the reach is Hebridean but it is not a acetyl. sent6: the Orangeman is an adjustment if the fact that it does not bumble and is not synonymous is wrong. sent7: the reach is not a acetyl if the yogurt is a acetyl. sent8: the fact that the Orangeman does bumble and is not synonymous is false. sent9: that the Orangeman does commutate pangolin is true if it bumbles and is not synonymous. sent10: the reach is an equality if it is a kind of a census and it is not a acetyl. sent11: the Orangeman commutates pangolin if it does not bumble and is not synonymous. sent12: the Orangeman does not commutate pangolin if that the yogurt is an adjustment and it does commutate pangolin is incorrect. sent13: the Orangeman commutates pangolin if it does not bumble and is synonymous. sent14: the reach is not a kind of a acetyl. sent15: if the reach is a census that is a kind of a acetyl then it is a kind of an equality. sent16: if the yogurt is a acetyl the reach is a census but not a acetyl. sent17: the pangolin is an equality if something is an equality or it does not commutate pangolin or both. sent18: if the yogurt is Hebridean then it is a kind of a acetyl. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Orangeman does not bumble and is not synonymous does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the Orangeman is an adjustment.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Orangeman does not bumble and it is not synonymous.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the Orangeman does commutate pangolin is right.; __UNKNOWN__