the fact that that the PIN or the non-Lamarckianness or both happens is true is false.
sent1: that the disapproval does not occur and the neoplasticness occurs is not true if the weathering does not occur. sent2: the negotiation does not occur if both the bicentennial and the ropiness occurs. sent3: the unapproachableness does not occur if the loading happens. sent4: the negotiation happens if the fraternalness occurs. sent5: the operaticness happens. sent6: if the suctioning happens the bicentennialness happens. sent7: that the annexationalness does not occur and the intelligence does not occur does not hold. sent8: the suctioning occurs if the fact that that the parricide does not occur and the Tamilness does not occur is not false is wrong. sent9: the Lamarckianness does not occur if the ropiness does not occur. sent10: that the professorialness does not occur triggers that the curvet but not the consummation happens. sent11: if that the annexationalness does not occur and the intelligence does not occur does not hold the PIN does not occur. sent12: if the curveting occurs then the sunshine occurs. sent13: if the fraternalness does not occur the Lamarckianness happens. sent14: the fact that the negotiation does not occur and the fraternalness does not occur is incorrect if the investigating ephah does not occur. sent15: the operaticness and the intelligence occurs. sent16: that the PIN happens and/or the Lamarckianness does not occur is false if the bicentennial does not occur. sent17: the investigating ephah and the fraternalness happens if the annexationalness does not occur. sent18: that the investigating Capella occurs and/or the cultism does not occur is not false. sent19: the non-operaticness causes that the annexationalness and the intelligence happens. sent20: that the annexationalness does not occur is not incorrect if both the operaticness and the intelligence happens. sent21: the suctioning is brought about by the parricide. sent22: if the suction does not occur then the fact that both the bicentennial and the ropiness happens does not hold. sent23: if the diffusing anthologist happens then the chelicerousness happens. sent24: the fact that the load occurs is not incorrect if the sunshine happens. sent25: that the parricide does not occur and the Tamil does not occur is wrong. sent26: the brokering does not occur if that the disapproval does not occur and the neoplasticness happens does not hold. sent27: if the investigating ephah does not occur then the Lamarckianness happens. sent28: if the unapproachableness does not occur then the weathering does not occur. sent29: if the brokering does not occur the operaticness does not occur.
sent8 & sent25 -> int1: the suctioning occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the bicentennial happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ropiness does not occur does not hold.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the bicentennial and the ropiness happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the negotiation does not occur is right.; sent20 & sent15 -> int5: the annexationalness does not occur.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: that both the investigating ephah and the fraternalness occurs is true.; int6 -> int7: the fraternalness occurs.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the negotiation occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the ropiness does not occur.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the Lamarckian does not occur.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the PIN happens or the Lamarckian does not occur or both is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the PIN or the non-Lamarckianness or both happens is true is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the disapproval does not occur and the neoplasticness occurs is not true if the weathering does not occur. sent2: the negotiation does not occur if both the bicentennial and the ropiness occurs. sent3: the unapproachableness does not occur if the loading happens. sent4: the negotiation happens if the fraternalness occurs. sent5: the operaticness happens. sent6: if the suctioning happens the bicentennialness happens. sent7: that the annexationalness does not occur and the intelligence does not occur does not hold. sent8: the suctioning occurs if the fact that that the parricide does not occur and the Tamilness does not occur is not false is wrong. sent9: the Lamarckianness does not occur if the ropiness does not occur. sent10: that the professorialness does not occur triggers that the curvet but not the consummation happens. sent11: if that the annexationalness does not occur and the intelligence does not occur does not hold the PIN does not occur. sent12: if the curveting occurs then the sunshine occurs. sent13: if the fraternalness does not occur the Lamarckianness happens. sent14: the fact that the negotiation does not occur and the fraternalness does not occur is incorrect if the investigating ephah does not occur. sent15: the operaticness and the intelligence occurs. sent16: that the PIN happens and/or the Lamarckianness does not occur is false if the bicentennial does not occur. sent17: the investigating ephah and the fraternalness happens if the annexationalness does not occur. sent18: that the investigating Capella occurs and/or the cultism does not occur is not false. sent19: the non-operaticness causes that the annexationalness and the intelligence happens. sent20: that the annexationalness does not occur is not incorrect if both the operaticness and the intelligence happens. sent21: the suctioning is brought about by the parricide. sent22: if the suction does not occur then the fact that both the bicentennial and the ropiness happens does not hold. sent23: if the diffusing anthologist happens then the chelicerousness happens. sent24: the fact that the load occurs is not incorrect if the sunshine happens. sent25: that the parricide does not occur and the Tamil does not occur is wrong. sent26: the brokering does not occur if that the disapproval does not occur and the neoplasticness happens does not hold. sent27: if the investigating ephah does not occur then the Lamarckianness happens. sent28: if the unapproachableness does not occur then the weathering does not occur. sent29: if the brokering does not occur the operaticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent25 -> int1: the suctioning occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the bicentennial happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ropiness does not occur does not hold.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the bicentennial and the ropiness happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the negotiation does not occur is right.; sent20 & sent15 -> int5: the annexationalness does not occur.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: that both the investigating ephah and the fraternalness occurs is true.; int6 -> int7: the fraternalness occurs.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the negotiation occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the ropiness does not occur.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the Lamarckian does not occur.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__