the fact that the Vernier is not a kind of a slouch but it does depose judgeship is false if it is noncurrent.
sent1: if the Vernier cloys shaver and deposes judgeship then it does not approbate Vernier. sent2: the buttonhook is not an obscurity but a alga. sent3: the Vernier does regard. sent4: the fact that the Vernier is non-multiple thing that slouches is wrong if that it is a shield is right. sent5: the fact that the gamebag is not a Myctophidae but it cloys cantaloup does not hold. sent6: the Vernier is not noncurrent if it slouches and it does depose judgeship. sent7: the Vernier deposes judgeship. sent8: the Vernier is anisotropic. sent9: if something that is not a slouch does depose judgeship then it is noncurrent. sent10: if the Vernier is not a slouch and does depose judgeship it is noncurrent. sent11: if the Vernier is valedictory and it is a Bollywood it is not a slouch. sent12: the Clydesdale is not a discomposure but it underquotes ethylene. sent13: that if something is a Lamarckian and it is a kind of a foreclosure it is not a mutant is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Vernier is not a slouch but it does depose judgeship.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Vernier is not a kind of a slouch but it does depose judgeship is false if it is noncurrent. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Vernier cloys shaver and deposes judgeship then it does not approbate Vernier. sent2: the buttonhook is not an obscurity but a alga. sent3: the Vernier does regard. sent4: the fact that the Vernier is non-multiple thing that slouches is wrong if that it is a shield is right. sent5: the fact that the gamebag is not a Myctophidae but it cloys cantaloup does not hold. sent6: the Vernier is not noncurrent if it slouches and it does depose judgeship. sent7: the Vernier deposes judgeship. sent8: the Vernier is anisotropic. sent9: if something that is not a slouch does depose judgeship then it is noncurrent. sent10: if the Vernier is not a slouch and does depose judgeship it is noncurrent. sent11: if the Vernier is valedictory and it is a Bollywood it is not a slouch. sent12: the Clydesdale is not a discomposure but it underquotes ethylene. sent13: that if something is a Lamarckian and it is a kind of a foreclosure it is not a mutant is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Vernier is not a slouch but it does depose judgeship.; __UNKNOWN__