the magus abjures papain.
sent1: the papain is a kind of non-omissive thing that is doctrinal. sent2: the magus is Falstaffian. sent3: the magus does abjure papain if that the papain is Falstaffian but it is not an institution is not correct. sent4: the papain is doctrinal. sent5: if something is not doctrinal then the fact that it is a kind of non-omissive thing that abjures papain is false. sent6: the papain is Falstaffian. sent7: if something is a kind of Falstaffian thing that is not an institution then that it is omissive is not false. sent8: the papain abjures papain if it is not non-Falstaffian but omissive.
sent7 -> int1: if the papain is Falstaffian and is not an institution it is omissive.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the papain is Falstaffian and is not an institution.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the papain is omissive.; sent1 -> int3: the papain is non-omissive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the papain is both Falstaffian and not an institution is not true hold.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the magus does not abjure papain.
sent5 -> int6: if the phalanger is not doctrinal the fact that it is not omissive and it abjures papain is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the magus abjures papain. ; $context$ = sent1: the papain is a kind of non-omissive thing that is doctrinal. sent2: the magus is Falstaffian. sent3: the magus does abjure papain if that the papain is Falstaffian but it is not an institution is not correct. sent4: the papain is doctrinal. sent5: if something is not doctrinal then the fact that it is a kind of non-omissive thing that abjures papain is false. sent6: the papain is Falstaffian. sent7: if something is a kind of Falstaffian thing that is not an institution then that it is omissive is not false. sent8: the papain abjures papain if it is not non-Falstaffian but omissive. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the papain is Falstaffian and is not an institution it is omissive.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the papain is Falstaffian and is not an institution.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the papain is omissive.; sent1 -> int3: the papain is non-omissive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the papain is both Falstaffian and not an institution is not true hold.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__