there exists something such that it does not assemble packinghouse.
sent1: the paleolith is a redberry. sent2: the fact that the paleolith does not land sclera but it is a chlamydospore is false. sent3: the paleolith does not refrain aspiration if it is not pelvic. sent4: if something that is serous does refrain quotient it is not pelvic. sent5: something that is not boneless is serous. sent6: something does refrain quotient if that it does not land sclera and is a chlamydospore is false. sent7: if the flamen is not a chlamydospore it refrains aspiration. sent8: if the paleolith does not refrain aspiration then the fact that the flamen does not refrain aspiration and it is non-homologous is not correct. sent9: if the fact that the campaigner does not know hold it does not refrain aspiration. sent10: if the paleolith is a kind of a redberry it is both not an heir and not boneless.
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the paleolith is not a kind of an heir and is not boneless.; int1 -> int2: the paleolith is not boneless.; sent5 -> int3: the paleolith is serous if it is not boneless.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the paleolith is serous.; sent6 -> int5: if that the paleolith does not land sclera but it is a kind of a chlamydospore is wrong then it does refrain quotient.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the paleolith does refrain quotient.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the paleolith is serous and it does refrain quotient.; sent4 -> int8: the paleolith is not pelvic if it is serous thing that does refrain quotient.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the paleolith is not pelvic.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the paleolith does not refrain aspiration.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: that the flamen does not refrain aspiration and it is not homologous does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does not assemble packinghouse. ; $context$ = sent1: the paleolith is a redberry. sent2: the fact that the paleolith does not land sclera but it is a chlamydospore is false. sent3: the paleolith does not refrain aspiration if it is not pelvic. sent4: if something that is serous does refrain quotient it is not pelvic. sent5: something that is not boneless is serous. sent6: something does refrain quotient if that it does not land sclera and is a chlamydospore is false. sent7: if the flamen is not a chlamydospore it refrains aspiration. sent8: if the paleolith does not refrain aspiration then the fact that the flamen does not refrain aspiration and it is non-homologous is not correct. sent9: if the fact that the campaigner does not know hold it does not refrain aspiration. sent10: if the paleolith is a kind of a redberry it is both not an heir and not boneless. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the paleolith is not a kind of an heir and is not boneless.; int1 -> int2: the paleolith is not boneless.; sent5 -> int3: the paleolith is serous if it is not boneless.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the paleolith is serous.; sent6 -> int5: if that the paleolith does not land sclera but it is a kind of a chlamydospore is wrong then it does refrain quotient.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the paleolith does refrain quotient.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the paleolith is serous and it does refrain quotient.; sent4 -> int8: the paleolith is not pelvic if it is serous thing that does refrain quotient.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the paleolith is not pelvic.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the paleolith does not refrain aspiration.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: that the flamen does not refrain aspiration and it is not homologous does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__