that the shirting is not unfathomable but antennal hold.
sent1: something that is not immobile is fathomable. sent2: if the silage does not nose Abkhaz then the fact that the shirting is both fathomable and antennal does not hold. sent3: the silage is fathomable. sent4: the silage is antennal. sent5: that the silage is a kind of non-immobile thing that does not meet cuppa does not hold. sent6: if the silage is immobile then the shirting does nose Abkhaz. sent7: the fact that the silage is not a microbat and it is not immobile is not true. sent8: the shirting is a microbat if it does meet Strauss. sent9: the ashram is latinate if it does meet Strauss. sent10: that something is antennal is not incorrect if it does not meet Strauss. sent11: something is fathomable if it noses Abkhaz. sent12: the shirting is immobile. sent13: the shirting does not meet Strauss and noses halophyte. sent14: if the fact that the shirting is not a kentan is not wrong it noses halophyte. sent15: the fact that the silage is not a kind of a microbat but it is immobile is not right. sent16: the rockcress is not Semite and it does not nose cowage. sent17: the shirting meets muffle and it is immobile. sent18: the shirting noses halophyte. sent19: everything does nose halophyte.
sent11 -> int1: the shirting is fathomable if it does nose Abkhaz.; sent10 -> int2: the shirting is antennal if it does not meet Strauss.; sent13 -> int3: the shirting does not meet Strauss.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the shirting is antennal.;
the algometer is antennal.
sent19 -> int5: the silage does nose halophyte.;
$hypothesis$ = that the shirting is not unfathomable but antennal hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not immobile is fathomable. sent2: if the silage does not nose Abkhaz then the fact that the shirting is both fathomable and antennal does not hold. sent3: the silage is fathomable. sent4: the silage is antennal. sent5: that the silage is a kind of non-immobile thing that does not meet cuppa does not hold. sent6: if the silage is immobile then the shirting does nose Abkhaz. sent7: the fact that the silage is not a microbat and it is not immobile is not true. sent8: the shirting is a microbat if it does meet Strauss. sent9: the ashram is latinate if it does meet Strauss. sent10: that something is antennal is not incorrect if it does not meet Strauss. sent11: something is fathomable if it noses Abkhaz. sent12: the shirting is immobile. sent13: the shirting does not meet Strauss and noses halophyte. sent14: if the fact that the shirting is not a kentan is not wrong it noses halophyte. sent15: the fact that the silage is not a kind of a microbat but it is immobile is not right. sent16: the rockcress is not Semite and it does not nose cowage. sent17: the shirting meets muffle and it is immobile. sent18: the shirting noses halophyte. sent19: everything does nose halophyte. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the shirting is fathomable if it does nose Abkhaz.; sent10 -> int2: the shirting is antennal if it does not meet Strauss.; sent13 -> int3: the shirting does not meet Strauss.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the shirting is antennal.; __UNKNOWN__