that the watering is a kind of a finder is not incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is marital is true. sent2: the carpal is a immunogenicity but not non-marital if it does not jell. sent3: if the carpal is a finder then the salvager is a kind of a finder. sent4: something does interpolate occident. sent5: the NP is a finder and it is marital. sent6: something is a kind of a immunogenicity and it is a kind of a finder. sent7: the NP is a kind of a majors. sent8: something is both a finder and a immunogenicity. sent9: there is something such that it is a finder. sent10: the watering is both a chromosome and a immunogenicity. sent11: the fact that if the salvager is a finder the watering is a kind of a finder is true. sent12: there exists something such that it looks salvager. sent13: the fact that the carpal is a finder hold if it is marital. sent14: the watering is not heavy. sent15: the NP is marital. sent16: something does look Ohm. sent17: there is something such that that it is a hyaline is right. sent18: the Transportation is not marital. sent19: the NP is marital and is a immunogenicity. sent20: the watering is not a kind of a finder if a marital thing is a immunogenicity.
sent19 -> int1: there is something such that it is marital and is a kind of a immunogenicity.; int1 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
that the watering is a kind of a finder is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = that the watering is a kind of a finder is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is marital is true. sent2: the carpal is a immunogenicity but not non-marital if it does not jell. sent3: if the carpal is a finder then the salvager is a kind of a finder. sent4: something does interpolate occident. sent5: the NP is a finder and it is marital. sent6: something is a kind of a immunogenicity and it is a kind of a finder. sent7: the NP is a kind of a majors. sent8: something is both a finder and a immunogenicity. sent9: there is something such that it is a finder. sent10: the watering is both a chromosome and a immunogenicity. sent11: the fact that if the salvager is a finder the watering is a kind of a finder is true. sent12: there exists something such that it looks salvager. sent13: the fact that the carpal is a finder hold if it is marital. sent14: the watering is not heavy. sent15: the NP is marital. sent16: something does look Ohm. sent17: there is something such that that it is a hyaline is right. sent18: the Transportation is not marital. sent19: the NP is marital and is a immunogenicity. sent20: the watering is not a kind of a finder if a marital thing is a immunogenicity. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: there is something such that it is marital and is a kind of a immunogenicity.; int1 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__