the Tyroleanness happens.
sent1: the undercutting does not occur if the fact that the arterioscleroticness happens hold. sent2: the Tyrolean is triggered by that the shunning remake does not occur and the morbilliformness does not occur. sent3: if the Tyroleanness occurs then the morbilliformness occurs. sent4: that the bibliomaniacalness happens but the shunning remake does not occur is not correct. sent5: if that the bibliomaniacalness but not the shunning remake happens does not hold the morbilliformness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tyroleanness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the morbilliformness occurs.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the morbilliformness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Tyrolean occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the Tyroleanness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the undercutting does not occur if the fact that the arterioscleroticness happens hold. sent2: the Tyrolean is triggered by that the shunning remake does not occur and the morbilliformness does not occur. sent3: if the Tyroleanness occurs then the morbilliformness occurs. sent4: that the bibliomaniacalness happens but the shunning remake does not occur is not correct. sent5: if that the bibliomaniacalness but not the shunning remake happens does not hold the morbilliformness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tyroleanness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the morbilliformness occurs.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the morbilliformness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__