that the uploading halma and the clementness happens is not wrong.
sent1: that the accumulating does not occur causes that the narrowness occurs and the allomerousness happens. sent2: the fact that both the pavage and the incredibleness occurs is wrong if the concentration does not occur. sent3: the clementness happens. sent4: that the uploading porkpie does not occur is brought about by that both the breakdown and the arterialness happens. sent5: the peripeteia does not occur. sent6: the entrance happens. sent7: the uncoiling snapdragon happens if the peripeteia does not occur. sent8: both the milestone and the fermenting daylily occurs. sent9: the fact that the cloying occurs and the uncoiling stocktaking occurs is wrong. sent10: the concentration does not occur. sent11: that the unnoticeableness and the dinning happens is wrong if the presidency does not occur. sent12: that the ligating does not occur is triggered by that the milestone does not occur and the write-off does not occur. sent13: if the breakdown does not occur then the clementness occurs. sent14: the dismemberment and the presidency happens. sent15: if the peripeteia does not occur both the uncoiling snapdragon and the emission happens. sent16: that both the drawing and the haranguing symphonist happens prevents the Lens. sent17: that the uploading Lutjanus and the dinning occurs is not true. sent18: that the pavage does not occur and the uploading porkpie does not occur prevents that the emission happens. sent19: both the uploading halma and the clementness occurs if the breakdown does not occur. sent20: the uncoiling snapdragon happens. sent21: the fact that the arterialness occurs hold. sent22: the pavage does not occur if that the pavage occurs and the incredibleness happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the breakdown occurs.; assump1 & sent21 -> int1: both the breakdown and the arterialness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the uploading porkpie does not occur hold.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the pavage and the incredibleness occurs is incorrect.; sent22 & int3 -> int4: the pavage does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the pavage does not occur and the uploading porkpie does not occur.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the emission does not occur.; sent15 & sent5 -> int7: the uncoiling snapdragon happens and the emission occurs.; int7 -> int8: the emission occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the breakdown does not occur hold.; int10 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
that the uploading halma occurs and the clementness happens does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the uploading halma and the clementness happens is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the accumulating does not occur causes that the narrowness occurs and the allomerousness happens. sent2: the fact that both the pavage and the incredibleness occurs is wrong if the concentration does not occur. sent3: the clementness happens. sent4: that the uploading porkpie does not occur is brought about by that both the breakdown and the arterialness happens. sent5: the peripeteia does not occur. sent6: the entrance happens. sent7: the uncoiling snapdragon happens if the peripeteia does not occur. sent8: both the milestone and the fermenting daylily occurs. sent9: the fact that the cloying occurs and the uncoiling stocktaking occurs is wrong. sent10: the concentration does not occur. sent11: that the unnoticeableness and the dinning happens is wrong if the presidency does not occur. sent12: that the ligating does not occur is triggered by that the milestone does not occur and the write-off does not occur. sent13: if the breakdown does not occur then the clementness occurs. sent14: the dismemberment and the presidency happens. sent15: if the peripeteia does not occur both the uncoiling snapdragon and the emission happens. sent16: that both the drawing and the haranguing symphonist happens prevents the Lens. sent17: that the uploading Lutjanus and the dinning occurs is not true. sent18: that the pavage does not occur and the uploading porkpie does not occur prevents that the emission happens. sent19: both the uploading halma and the clementness occurs if the breakdown does not occur. sent20: the uncoiling snapdragon happens. sent21: the fact that the arterialness occurs hold. sent22: the pavage does not occur if that the pavage occurs and the incredibleness happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the breakdown occurs.; assump1 & sent21 -> int1: both the breakdown and the arterialness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the uploading porkpie does not occur hold.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the pavage and the incredibleness occurs is incorrect.; sent22 & int3 -> int4: the pavage does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the pavage does not occur and the uploading porkpie does not occur.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the emission does not occur.; sent15 & sent5 -> int7: the uncoiling snapdragon happens and the emission occurs.; int7 -> int8: the emission occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the breakdown does not occur hold.; int10 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__