the counterespionage and the significantness occurs.
sent1: if that the zeroing does not occur and the queering does not occur is not true then the potter does not occur. sent2: if the unknowableness occurs then the fact that the zeroness does not occur and the queering does not occur does not hold. sent3: that the Algerianness does not occur triggers that the azotemicness occurs and/or the alliance does not occur. sent4: the significantness happens. sent5: if the unpalatableness does not occur then both the startling Viscaceae and the unknowableness happens. sent6: that the poplitealness occurs is prevented by that both the alliance and the azotemicness happens. sent7: that the counterespionage happens and the significantness happens is not right if the alliance does not occur. sent8: the pottering occurs. sent9: the poplitealness occurs. sent10: that the Albigensianness does not occur or the national occurs or both is incorrect if that the diffuseness occurs is correct. sent11: that not the azotemicness but the pottering happens prevents that the counterespionage does not occur. sent12: the double and the diffuseness happens if the fact that the grunting does not occur is not false. sent13: both the alliance and the Algerian happens. sent14: the unpalatableness does not occur if that the non-Albigensianness and/or the nationalness occurs does not hold.
sent13 -> int1: the alliance occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the azotemicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the alliance and the azotemicness occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the poplitealness does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the azotemicness does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the azotemicness does not occur and the pottering occurs.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the counterespionage occurs.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the counterespionage happens and the significantness happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the counterespionage and the significantness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the zeroing does not occur and the queering does not occur is not true then the potter does not occur. sent2: if the unknowableness occurs then the fact that the zeroness does not occur and the queering does not occur does not hold. sent3: that the Algerianness does not occur triggers that the azotemicness occurs and/or the alliance does not occur. sent4: the significantness happens. sent5: if the unpalatableness does not occur then both the startling Viscaceae and the unknowableness happens. sent6: that the poplitealness occurs is prevented by that both the alliance and the azotemicness happens. sent7: that the counterespionage happens and the significantness happens is not right if the alliance does not occur. sent8: the pottering occurs. sent9: the poplitealness occurs. sent10: that the Albigensianness does not occur or the national occurs or both is incorrect if that the diffuseness occurs is correct. sent11: that not the azotemicness but the pottering happens prevents that the counterespionage does not occur. sent12: the double and the diffuseness happens if the fact that the grunting does not occur is not false. sent13: both the alliance and the Algerian happens. sent14: the unpalatableness does not occur if that the non-Albigensianness and/or the nationalness occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the alliance occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the azotemicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the alliance and the azotemicness occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the poplitealness does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the azotemicness does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the azotemicness does not occur and the pottering occurs.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the counterespionage occurs.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__