there is something such that that it is intracranial or it does cut or both is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a kind of a submergence and/or drinks Lupinus. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is mutative hold that the fisherman is intracranial and/or it is a cutting is false. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it does warm Jenny and/or drinks Nyctimene does not hold. sent4: there is something such that it is not non-mutative. sent5: there is something such that it is not hypertensive. sent6: something is a hypertensive or it warms steeple or both. sent7: if something is intracranial then the fisherman does not drink fatalism. sent8: there is something such that it is not an eyebrow. sent9: if there is something such that it is ornithological then that the Nyala is not thallophytic is correct. sent10: if the fisherman is not mutative then the fact that either the screwball is thallophytic or it is intracranial or both does not hold. sent11: the fact that something does realize applemint is not wrong. sent12: there is something such that the fact that either it is a stocks or it is Monacan or both is wrong.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: that the fisherman is intracranial and/or it is a cutting does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the screwball is thallophytic or it is intracranial or both is false.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that that it is intracranial or it does cut or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a kind of a submergence and/or drinks Lupinus. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is mutative hold that the fisherman is intracranial and/or it is a cutting is false. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it does warm Jenny and/or drinks Nyctimene does not hold. sent4: there is something such that it is not non-mutative. sent5: there is something such that it is not hypertensive. sent6: something is a hypertensive or it warms steeple or both. sent7: if something is intracranial then the fisherman does not drink fatalism. sent8: there is something such that it is not an eyebrow. sent9: if there is something such that it is ornithological then that the Nyala is not thallophytic is correct. sent10: if the fisherman is not mutative then the fact that either the screwball is thallophytic or it is intracranial or both does not hold. sent11: the fact that something does realize applemint is not wrong. sent12: there is something such that the fact that either it is a stocks or it is Monacan or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: that the fisherman is intracranial and/or it is a cutting does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__