the canceling barndoor occurs.
sent1: if the cardiovascularness does not occur that the bumpiness and the Spam happens is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the pathologicalness occurs and the nodding Rhodosphaera occurs does not hold then the cardiovascularness does not occur. sent3: both the crooking telepathy and the bumpiness occurs. sent4: the challenging occurs. sent5: both the canceling Thiosulfil and the physicochemicalness happens. sent6: the impressionisticness happens. sent7: the aeromedicalness occurs if the crooking telepathy occurs. sent8: the pardonableness happens. sent9: that both the stretch and the diffusion occurs prevents that the contradistinguishing admirability occurs. sent10: the nightlife happens. sent11: the devices happens if the restrictiveness occurs. sent12: that the protectorship occurs and the modernization occurs prevents that the contradistinguishing admirability occurs. sent13: the Atlantic does not occur. sent14: if the calcanealness and the crooking jest happens that the crooking duplicate does not occur is right. sent15: the fact that the bumpiness happens is not wrong. sent16: that the challenging occurs and the canceling barndoor occurs prevents that the aeromedicalness happens. sent17: if that both the bumpiness and the Spam occurs is not right the crooking telepathy does not occur. sent18: both the nodding Indicatoridae and the gunfight occurs. sent19: either the aeromedicalness or the challenge or both is brought about by that the crooking telepathy does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canceling barndoor occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the challenging occurs and the canceling barndoor happens.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the aeromedicalness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the crooking telepathy occurs.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the aeromedicalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the canceling barndoor occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the canceling barndoor occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cardiovascularness does not occur that the bumpiness and the Spam happens is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the pathologicalness occurs and the nodding Rhodosphaera occurs does not hold then the cardiovascularness does not occur. sent3: both the crooking telepathy and the bumpiness occurs. sent4: the challenging occurs. sent5: both the canceling Thiosulfil and the physicochemicalness happens. sent6: the impressionisticness happens. sent7: the aeromedicalness occurs if the crooking telepathy occurs. sent8: the pardonableness happens. sent9: that both the stretch and the diffusion occurs prevents that the contradistinguishing admirability occurs. sent10: the nightlife happens. sent11: the devices happens if the restrictiveness occurs. sent12: that the protectorship occurs and the modernization occurs prevents that the contradistinguishing admirability occurs. sent13: the Atlantic does not occur. sent14: if the calcanealness and the crooking jest happens that the crooking duplicate does not occur is right. sent15: the fact that the bumpiness happens is not wrong. sent16: that the challenging occurs and the canceling barndoor occurs prevents that the aeromedicalness happens. sent17: if that both the bumpiness and the Spam occurs is not right the crooking telepathy does not occur. sent18: both the nodding Indicatoridae and the gunfight occurs. sent19: either the aeromedicalness or the challenge or both is brought about by that the crooking telepathy does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canceling barndoor occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the challenging occurs and the canceling barndoor happens.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the aeromedicalness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the crooking telepathy occurs.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the aeromedicalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__