the janitor is Algonquian.
sent1: the janitor does not articulate mealworm. sent2: there is something such that that it is not Algonquian and it is a kind of a magistracy is not true. sent3: if something is not a magistracy but it is a Hispanic it is not Algonquian. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does not toilet-train Offertory and does not articulate janitor is not right. sent5: the lily is not a kind of a magistracy if there exists something such that that it does not toilet-train Offertory and does not articulate janitor is not true. sent6: if the Austrian is not a poppet then the fact that the storybook is not a neurogliacyte and is non-Hispanic is not right. sent7: the brotula is not a poppet and/or is not a kind of a Melissa. sent8: something is not Algonquian and it is not a magistracy. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a magistracy and it is a Algonquian is not correct. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-sacerdotal thing that is not a magistracy does not hold then the lily does not syllogize Grozny. sent11: if there exists something such that either it is not a kind of a poppet or it is not a Melissa or both the Austrian is not a poppet. sent12: the fact that something does not toilet-train Offertory and does not articulate janitor is not incorrect. sent13: the janitor is a kind of a magistracy. sent14: something does not articulate storybook and it is not a kind of a literati. sent15: the janitor is a kind of a Algonquian if the lily is not a magistracy. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is not Algonquian and not a magistracy is wrong. sent17: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a magistracy and it is not a Algonquian does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it toilet-trains Offertory and it does not articulate janitor is not true. sent19: if there exists something such that that it does toilet-train Offertory hold then the lily is not a magistracy. sent20: something is not a kind of a magistracy and is not a kind of a Algonquian. sent21: the lily is not Algonquian if that the Creole is not a magistracy but it is a Algonquian is not right. sent22: there is something such that that it does not toilet-train Offertory and does articulate janitor is incorrect. sent23: the lily is not a kind of a Algonquian if there exists something such that it is a magistracy.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the lily is not a kind of a magistracy.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the janitor is not a Algonquian.
sent7 -> int2: there is something such that it either is not a poppet or is not a kind of a Melissa or both.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the Austrian is not a poppet.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the storybook is both not a neurogliacyte and not Hispanic is not right.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a neurogliacyte and not a Hispanic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the janitor is Algonquian. ; $context$ = sent1: the janitor does not articulate mealworm. sent2: there is something such that that it is not Algonquian and it is a kind of a magistracy is not true. sent3: if something is not a magistracy but it is a Hispanic it is not Algonquian. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does not toilet-train Offertory and does not articulate janitor is not right. sent5: the lily is not a kind of a magistracy if there exists something such that that it does not toilet-train Offertory and does not articulate janitor is not true. sent6: if the Austrian is not a poppet then the fact that the storybook is not a neurogliacyte and is non-Hispanic is not right. sent7: the brotula is not a poppet and/or is not a kind of a Melissa. sent8: something is not Algonquian and it is not a magistracy. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a magistracy and it is a Algonquian is not correct. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-sacerdotal thing that is not a magistracy does not hold then the lily does not syllogize Grozny. sent11: if there exists something such that either it is not a kind of a poppet or it is not a Melissa or both the Austrian is not a poppet. sent12: the fact that something does not toilet-train Offertory and does not articulate janitor is not incorrect. sent13: the janitor is a kind of a magistracy. sent14: something does not articulate storybook and it is not a kind of a literati. sent15: the janitor is a kind of a Algonquian if the lily is not a magistracy. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is not Algonquian and not a magistracy is wrong. sent17: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a magistracy and it is not a Algonquian does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it toilet-trains Offertory and it does not articulate janitor is not true. sent19: if there exists something such that that it does toilet-train Offertory hold then the lily is not a magistracy. sent20: something is not a kind of a magistracy and is not a kind of a Algonquian. sent21: the lily is not Algonquian if that the Creole is not a magistracy but it is a Algonquian is not right. sent22: there is something such that that it does not toilet-train Offertory and does articulate janitor is incorrect. sent23: the lily is not a kind of a Algonquian if there exists something such that it is a magistracy. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the lily is not a kind of a magistracy.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__