the devaluing and/or the rousing happens if the amitoticness does not occur.
sent1: the Hinduness happens but the trafficking foundation does not occur if the amitoticness occurs. sent2: the conservancy does not occur. sent3: the trafficking Francoa does not occur and the rousing does not occur if the disagreement does not occur. sent4: that the lighterage does not occur is prevented by the fact that that the vitrioling taekwondo does not occur and the uncomfortableness happens hold. sent5: the trafficking foundation does not occur. sent6: that not the galvanization but the stargazing occurs prevents that the trafficking Francoa does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amitoticness does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the trafficking foundation does not occur and the amitoticness does not occur.;
the Hinduness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the devaluing and/or the rousing happens if the amitoticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the Hinduness happens but the trafficking foundation does not occur if the amitoticness occurs. sent2: the conservancy does not occur. sent3: the trafficking Francoa does not occur and the rousing does not occur if the disagreement does not occur. sent4: that the lighterage does not occur is prevented by the fact that that the vitrioling taekwondo does not occur and the uncomfortableness happens hold. sent5: the trafficking foundation does not occur. sent6: that not the galvanization but the stargazing occurs prevents that the trafficking Francoa does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amitoticness does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the trafficking foundation does not occur and the amitoticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__