there exists something such that if it does not devein debut and is not a kind of a cragsman then it is not upper-class.
sent1: if the wedge does not devein debut and it is not a cragsman it is upper-class. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a iron-tree and does not devein nonappearance then the fact that it is not organismal is not false. sent3: if a non-Minoan thing does not watch Puck it is not a kind of a Caryocar. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not devein debut and it is a cragsman it is non-upper-class. sent5: the workaholic does not corrupt if it is not upper-class and it does not watch casquet. sent6: there is something such that if it deveins debut and it is not a cragsman then it is not upper-class. sent7: the wedge is not a kind of a Nasturtium if it does not cram cinnabar and it is not upper-class. sent8: the wedge is not upper-class if it does not devein debut and is not a kind of a cragsman. sent9: the wedge is not upper-class if it does not devein debut and is a cragsman. sent10: if something that is not a kind of an embodiment does not devein debut then it is not a Akron. sent11: that the poisoner is not a Vidua is not wrong if it is a kind of a paleographer that is not upper-class. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not devein debut and is not a cragsman then it is not non-upper-class. sent13: that there is something such that if it is not demagogic and does not hum capstone it is not comparable is not false. sent14: the fact that the wedge is not upper-class is not wrong if it does devein debut and it is not a cragsman.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the wedge is not a Akron if it is not an embodiment and does not devein debut.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not devein debut and is not a kind of a cragsman then it is not upper-class. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wedge does not devein debut and it is not a cragsman it is upper-class. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a iron-tree and does not devein nonappearance then the fact that it is not organismal is not false. sent3: if a non-Minoan thing does not watch Puck it is not a kind of a Caryocar. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not devein debut and it is a cragsman it is non-upper-class. sent5: the workaholic does not corrupt if it is not upper-class and it does not watch casquet. sent6: there is something such that if it deveins debut and it is not a cragsman then it is not upper-class. sent7: the wedge is not a kind of a Nasturtium if it does not cram cinnabar and it is not upper-class. sent8: the wedge is not upper-class if it does not devein debut and is not a kind of a cragsman. sent9: the wedge is not upper-class if it does not devein debut and is a cragsman. sent10: if something that is not a kind of an embodiment does not devein debut then it is not a Akron. sent11: that the poisoner is not a Vidua is not wrong if it is a kind of a paleographer that is not upper-class. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not devein debut and is not a cragsman then it is not non-upper-class. sent13: that there is something such that if it is not demagogic and does not hum capstone it is not comparable is not false. sent14: the fact that the wedge is not upper-class is not wrong if it does devein debut and it is not a cragsman. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__