the radiocarbon is not a throw-in.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a bulrush and it is a pear is not true. sent2: something is a kind of ungenerous thing that is not a spleen. sent3: there is something such that it is not artless. sent4: if that the Byzantine does not mooch haymaker hold the radiocarbon is a throw-in and does outnumber Baphia. sent5: that the phosphorescence is not a kind of a Acanthuridae and it does not outnumber tellurium is not true. sent6: if the Byzantine outnumbers Baphia the fact that the belt is not a bulrush and it is not a kind of a pear is wrong. sent7: that the Byzantine does not mooch haymaker and it is not artless is correct if it is not a show. sent8: that the belt is not a bulrush but it is a pear is not right. sent9: The Baphia outnumbers Byzantine. sent10: the disa does show if something does mooch haymaker but it is not artless. sent11: if something is a kind of a iodothyronine the fact that it is not a kind of a farrier or it is not artless or both does not hold. sent12: there is something such that it does reorient Heliobacter. sent13: the barycenter is not artless if that the minster is not a farrier and/or it is not artless is not true. sent14: the fact that the Byzantine is not a iodothyronine is not incorrect if the minster outnumbers Baphia. sent15: there is something such that the fact that either it reorients expansionism or it is not non-bisexual or both is wrong. sent16: if the belt is a kind of a show that is not a iodothyronine then the Byzantine does not show. sent17: the minster is artless. sent18: the fact that the belt is not a bulrush and does not outnumber Baphia does not hold. sent19: something is not a bulrush and not a pear. sent20: the radiocarbon is a show. sent21: there is something such that that it is a bulrush and it is not a pear is incorrect. sent22: something mooches haymaker and is artless. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it reorients expansionism and/or it is a bisexual is not right the minster is a iodothyronine. sent24: if the disa is a show the radiocarbon is not a kind of a throw-in. sent25: if something is a kind of a iodothyronine it is artless. sent26: the barycenter does mooch haymaker if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a bulrush and is not a pear does not hold. sent27: there exists something such that it is not a bisexual.
sent11 -> int1: if the minster is a iodothyronine then that it is not a farrier and/or it is not artless is false.; sent15 & sent23 -> int2: the minster is a iodothyronine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the minster is not a farrier and/or is not artless does not hold.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the barycenter is not artless hold.;
the radiocarbon is a throw-in.
$hypothesis$ = the radiocarbon is not a throw-in. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a bulrush and it is a pear is not true. sent2: something is a kind of ungenerous thing that is not a spleen. sent3: there is something such that it is not artless. sent4: if that the Byzantine does not mooch haymaker hold the radiocarbon is a throw-in and does outnumber Baphia. sent5: that the phosphorescence is not a kind of a Acanthuridae and it does not outnumber tellurium is not true. sent6: if the Byzantine outnumbers Baphia the fact that the belt is not a bulrush and it is not a kind of a pear is wrong. sent7: that the Byzantine does not mooch haymaker and it is not artless is correct if it is not a show. sent8: that the belt is not a bulrush but it is a pear is not right. sent9: The Baphia outnumbers Byzantine. sent10: the disa does show if something does mooch haymaker but it is not artless. sent11: if something is a kind of a iodothyronine the fact that it is not a kind of a farrier or it is not artless or both does not hold. sent12: there is something such that it does reorient Heliobacter. sent13: the barycenter is not artless if that the minster is not a farrier and/or it is not artless is not true. sent14: the fact that the Byzantine is not a iodothyronine is not incorrect if the minster outnumbers Baphia. sent15: there is something such that the fact that either it reorients expansionism or it is not non-bisexual or both is wrong. sent16: if the belt is a kind of a show that is not a iodothyronine then the Byzantine does not show. sent17: the minster is artless. sent18: the fact that the belt is not a bulrush and does not outnumber Baphia does not hold. sent19: something is not a bulrush and not a pear. sent20: the radiocarbon is a show. sent21: there is something such that that it is a bulrush and it is not a pear is incorrect. sent22: something mooches haymaker and is artless. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it reorients expansionism and/or it is a bisexual is not right the minster is a iodothyronine. sent24: if the disa is a show the radiocarbon is not a kind of a throw-in. sent25: if something is a kind of a iodothyronine it is artless. sent26: the barycenter does mooch haymaker if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a bulrush and is not a pear does not hold. sent27: there exists something such that it is not a bisexual. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the minster is a iodothyronine then that it is not a farrier and/or it is not artless is false.; sent15 & sent23 -> int2: the minster is a iodothyronine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the minster is not a farrier and/or is not artless does not hold.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the barycenter is not artless hold.; __UNKNOWN__