there exists something such that if it is not a reliever it is non-articulatory and it is a Bridget.
sent1: a non-cauline thing is non-dominical thing that remonstrates thought-image. sent2: if the fact that the propyl is not a grubby is not wrong it does not remonstrate mansion and is articulatory. sent3: the fact that something is articulatory and it is a Bridget is not incorrect if it is not a reliever. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a demand it is not a Parashurama and remonstrates Nanak. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a Hippobosca it is a kind of non-Namibian thing that does circumnavigate. sent6: the basketeer does not remonstrate norgestrel but it remonstrates thought-image if it is not a kind of a Brasov. sent7: a non-unhelpful thing is not a karate and does measure dodecahedron. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a reliever it is articulatory and it is a kind of a Bridget. sent9: something is both not articulatory and a Bridget if it is not a kind of a reliever. sent10: something is not an oscilloscope but it is a kind of a Ruritanian if it is non-dolichocephalic. sent11: the flagfish does not syllogize thermion and is a Hippobosca if it is not a kind of a smuggler. sent12: if the basketeer is not a reliever then the fact that it is articulatory and it is a Bridget is not incorrect. sent13: the basketeer is non-articulatory a Bridget if it is a reliever. sent14: if the novobiocin is not a kind of a reliever then it is not a Hippobosca and it is a kind of a pastrami. sent15: the fact that the basketeer is a kind of the Bridget if the basketeer is not a reliever is not false. sent16: there is something such that if it is a reliever then it is not articulatory and is a Bridget. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a reliever then it is a kind of a Bridget. sent18: if something is a reliever that it is not articulatory but a Bridget is not incorrect. sent19: if something is not a reliever then it is a kind of a Bridget. sent20: if the basketeer is not articulatory it is not a Angara and it is unrepeatable.
sent9 -> int1: the basketeer is not articulatory but it is a Bridget if it is not a reliever.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a reliever it is non-articulatory and it is a Bridget. ; $context$ = sent1: a non-cauline thing is non-dominical thing that remonstrates thought-image. sent2: if the fact that the propyl is not a grubby is not wrong it does not remonstrate mansion and is articulatory. sent3: the fact that something is articulatory and it is a Bridget is not incorrect if it is not a reliever. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a demand it is not a Parashurama and remonstrates Nanak. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a Hippobosca it is a kind of non-Namibian thing that does circumnavigate. sent6: the basketeer does not remonstrate norgestrel but it remonstrates thought-image if it is not a kind of a Brasov. sent7: a non-unhelpful thing is not a karate and does measure dodecahedron. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a reliever it is articulatory and it is a kind of a Bridget. sent9: something is both not articulatory and a Bridget if it is not a kind of a reliever. sent10: something is not an oscilloscope but it is a kind of a Ruritanian if it is non-dolichocephalic. sent11: the flagfish does not syllogize thermion and is a Hippobosca if it is not a kind of a smuggler. sent12: if the basketeer is not a reliever then the fact that it is articulatory and it is a Bridget is not incorrect. sent13: the basketeer is non-articulatory a Bridget if it is a reliever. sent14: if the novobiocin is not a kind of a reliever then it is not a Hippobosca and it is a kind of a pastrami. sent15: the fact that the basketeer is a kind of the Bridget if the basketeer is not a reliever is not false. sent16: there is something such that if it is a reliever then it is not articulatory and is a Bridget. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a reliever then it is a kind of a Bridget. sent18: if something is a reliever that it is not articulatory but a Bridget is not incorrect. sent19: if something is not a reliever then it is a kind of a Bridget. sent20: if the basketeer is not articulatory it is not a Angara and it is unrepeatable. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the basketeer is not articulatory but it is a Bridget if it is not a reliever.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__