the fact that the joss does not interrelate Platystemon and it is not an alcazar is not right.
sent1: if the amygdalin does redecorate Chemakum then the phospholipid is a mediation. sent2: the amygdalin does redecorate Chemakum if that it interrelates childhood and/or it is not an ontology is false. sent3: if the fact that something interrelates childhood or is not an ontology or both does not hold it does redecorate Chemakum. sent4: if there is something such that it is not a quadratic that the duct is not Huxleyan is correct. sent5: that the joss does not interrelate Platystemon and is not an alcazar is wrong if the phospholipid is a mediation. sent6: that the joss does not interrelate Platystemon but it is an alcazar is not true. sent7: if the fact that something does not interrelate childhood or is a kind of an ontology or both is not right the fact that it redecorates Chemakum is correct. sent8: the fact that the joss interrelates Platystemon and is not an alcazar is not true if the phospholipid is a mediation. sent9: there exists something such that it is quadratic. sent10: if the fact that either something does not interrelate childhood or it is not a kind of an ontology or both is not true then it redecorates Chemakum. sent11: the duct is Huxleyan if it is autosomal. sent12: either the amygdalin interrelates childhood or it is not a kind of an ontology or both. sent13: that the amygdalin redecorates Chemakum if that the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood and/or is a kind of an ontology is incorrect is correct. sent14: the double is not quadratic. sent15: if the amygdalin is not Huxleyan the joss does not interrelate Platystemon and is not an alcazar. sent16: if the phospholipid is a mediation the fact that the joss does not interrelate Platystemon but it is an alcazar is not correct. sent17: the duct is autosomal if either the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood or it is not a kind of an ontology or both. sent18: the duct interrelates Platystemon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood and/or is not an ontology.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the duct is autosomal.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the duct is Huxleyan.; sent14 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a quadratic.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the duct is not Huxleyan.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that either the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood or it is not an ontology or both is false.; sent10 -> int7: if that the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood and/or it is not an ontology is incorrect it does redecorate Chemakum.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the amygdalin does redecorate Chemakum.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the phospholipid is a mediation.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the joss does not interrelate Platystemon and it is not an alcazar.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the joss does not interrelate Platystemon and it is not an alcazar is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the amygdalin does redecorate Chemakum then the phospholipid is a mediation. sent2: the amygdalin does redecorate Chemakum if that it interrelates childhood and/or it is not an ontology is false. sent3: if the fact that something interrelates childhood or is not an ontology or both does not hold it does redecorate Chemakum. sent4: if there is something such that it is not a quadratic that the duct is not Huxleyan is correct. sent5: that the joss does not interrelate Platystemon and is not an alcazar is wrong if the phospholipid is a mediation. sent6: that the joss does not interrelate Platystemon but it is an alcazar is not true. sent7: if the fact that something does not interrelate childhood or is a kind of an ontology or both is not right the fact that it redecorates Chemakum is correct. sent8: the fact that the joss interrelates Platystemon and is not an alcazar is not true if the phospholipid is a mediation. sent9: there exists something such that it is quadratic. sent10: if the fact that either something does not interrelate childhood or it is not a kind of an ontology or both is not true then it redecorates Chemakum. sent11: the duct is Huxleyan if it is autosomal. sent12: either the amygdalin interrelates childhood or it is not a kind of an ontology or both. sent13: that the amygdalin redecorates Chemakum if that the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood and/or is a kind of an ontology is incorrect is correct. sent14: the double is not quadratic. sent15: if the amygdalin is not Huxleyan the joss does not interrelate Platystemon and is not an alcazar. sent16: if the phospholipid is a mediation the fact that the joss does not interrelate Platystemon but it is an alcazar is not correct. sent17: the duct is autosomal if either the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood or it is not a kind of an ontology or both. sent18: the duct interrelates Platystemon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood and/or is not an ontology.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the duct is autosomal.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the duct is Huxleyan.; sent14 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a quadratic.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the duct is not Huxleyan.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that either the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood or it is not an ontology or both is false.; sent10 -> int7: if that the amygdalin does not interrelate childhood and/or it is not an ontology is incorrect it does redecorate Chemakum.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the amygdalin does redecorate Chemakum.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the phospholipid is a mediation.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__