there is something such that if the fact that it is unswept and Gandhian is not true it is not a playlist.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not Gandhian then it is not a kind of a playlist. sent2: if that the usufructuary is unswept and is Gandhian does not hold then it is not a playlist. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of unswept thing that is Gandhian then that it is not a playlist is not wrong. sent4: there is something such that if that it is naive thing that preempts is not correct that it does not turn paw is not false. sent5: the usufructuary is not a playlist if it is not Gandhian. sent6: if that something is a sojourn but not non-Hebridean is not correct then it is not sublittoral. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a seedtime and it does lamb unpersuasiveness is not right then it does not plug. sent8: the fact that there is something such that if it is not unswept it is not a playlist is true. sent9: the usufructuary is not paleolithic if that it is unswept thing that is an esteem does not hold. sent10: if the fact that something is gradual but not swept does not hold it does not chirk. sent11: if the usufructuary is both unswept and not non-Gandhian it is not a playlist. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not non-scapulohumeral but an irons is not right then the fact that it does not turn Kichaga is not wrong. sent13: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is unswept thing that is Gandhian is not true it is a playlist hold. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a gooseflesh and does adduct exponentiation does not hold that it is not a Kassite is correct. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is a waltzer and is a immunochemistry is incorrect it is non-neuroanatomic. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a falsity and is worthless does not hold it is not a masterstroke. sent17: the usufructuary is a playlist if that it is unswept and it is Gandhian does not hold.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is a sojourn and it is Hebridean is not right then the fact that it is not sublittoral is correct.
sent6 -> int1: the Popper is not sublittoral if the fact that it is a kind of a sojourn that is Hebridean is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is unswept and Gandhian is not true it is not a playlist. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not Gandhian then it is not a kind of a playlist. sent2: if that the usufructuary is unswept and is Gandhian does not hold then it is not a playlist. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of unswept thing that is Gandhian then that it is not a playlist is not wrong. sent4: there is something such that if that it is naive thing that preempts is not correct that it does not turn paw is not false. sent5: the usufructuary is not a playlist if it is not Gandhian. sent6: if that something is a sojourn but not non-Hebridean is not correct then it is not sublittoral. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a seedtime and it does lamb unpersuasiveness is not right then it does not plug. sent8: the fact that there is something such that if it is not unswept it is not a playlist is true. sent9: the usufructuary is not paleolithic if that it is unswept thing that is an esteem does not hold. sent10: if the fact that something is gradual but not swept does not hold it does not chirk. sent11: if the usufructuary is both unswept and not non-Gandhian it is not a playlist. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not non-scapulohumeral but an irons is not right then the fact that it does not turn Kichaga is not wrong. sent13: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is unswept thing that is Gandhian is not true it is a playlist hold. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a gooseflesh and does adduct exponentiation does not hold that it is not a Kassite is correct. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is a waltzer and is a immunochemistry is incorrect it is non-neuroanatomic. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a falsity and is worthless does not hold it is not a masterstroke. sent17: the usufructuary is a playlist if that it is unswept and it is Gandhian does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__