the Fauntleroy does not toilet-train Acre.
sent1: the Ovocon is not a kind of a composure if the BIN does toilet-train ludo but it is not a composure. sent2: something is not pectic if it syllogizes beebalm. sent3: the fact that the headman does not track and/or it is not pectic is not true if the halide is not pectic. sent4: something is pectic if it does toilet-train Acre. sent5: if the fact that the BIN does not toilet-train armful is not incorrect then it toilet-trains ludo and is not a kind of a composure. sent6: that the Ovocon is a kind of a discourse and is an iconography is incorrect if it is not a kind of a composure. sent7: the halide does not toilet-train strength. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a track and/or it is not pectic is false the Fauntleroy does not toilet-train Acre. sent9: if something does syllogize attribute then that the headman is not a track and does not resent caroler does not hold. sent10: The strength does not toilet-train halide. sent11: if something syllogizes beebalm then that it is pectic and does not toilet-train Acre is false. sent12: if there exists something such that that it does discourse and is an iconography is not correct then the laundry is bionic. sent13: the BIN does not toilet-train armful. sent14: something syllogizes attribute if it is bionic. sent15: the headman does track if the halide is non-pectic. sent16: the halide is non-boustrophedonic. sent17: the elsholtzia does not toilet-train strength.
sent7 -> int1: the halide does syllogize Fauntleroy and/or it does not toilet-train strength.; sent2 -> int2: if the halide does syllogize beebalm then it is not pectic.;
the Bercy does not syllogize beebalm.
sent4 -> int3: if that the headman toilet-trains Acre is not incorrect it is pectic.;
$hypothesis$ = the Fauntleroy does not toilet-train Acre. ; $context$ = sent1: the Ovocon is not a kind of a composure if the BIN does toilet-train ludo but it is not a composure. sent2: something is not pectic if it syllogizes beebalm. sent3: the fact that the headman does not track and/or it is not pectic is not true if the halide is not pectic. sent4: something is pectic if it does toilet-train Acre. sent5: if the fact that the BIN does not toilet-train armful is not incorrect then it toilet-trains ludo and is not a kind of a composure. sent6: that the Ovocon is a kind of a discourse and is an iconography is incorrect if it is not a kind of a composure. sent7: the halide does not toilet-train strength. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a track and/or it is not pectic is false the Fauntleroy does not toilet-train Acre. sent9: if something does syllogize attribute then that the headman is not a track and does not resent caroler does not hold. sent10: The strength does not toilet-train halide. sent11: if something syllogizes beebalm then that it is pectic and does not toilet-train Acre is false. sent12: if there exists something such that that it does discourse and is an iconography is not correct then the laundry is bionic. sent13: the BIN does not toilet-train armful. sent14: something syllogizes attribute if it is bionic. sent15: the headman does track if the halide is non-pectic. sent16: the halide is non-boustrophedonic. sent17: the elsholtzia does not toilet-train strength. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the halide does syllogize Fauntleroy and/or it does not toilet-train strength.; sent2 -> int2: if the halide does syllogize beebalm then it is not pectic.; __UNKNOWN__