the prolusoriness happens and the insufflating Bangladesh does not occur.
sent1: that the ballisticness does not occur and/or that the drilling heir-at-law does not occur is brought about by the aerophilatelicness. sent2: the insufflating Bangladesh does not occur if that not the cropping but the insufflating Bangladesh occurs does not hold. sent3: the reheating FAQ does not occur and the drilling colon does not occur. sent4: that the roasting happens is not wrong if the reheating FAQ does not occur and the drilling colon does not occur. sent5: the prolusoriness occurs if either the ballisticness does not occur or the drilling heir-at-law does not occur or both. sent6: the fact that not the cropping but the insufflating Bangladesh occurs is not right if the souring occurs. sent7: if the roasting occurs the aerophilatelicness happens. sent8: the soured occurs.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the roasting happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the aerophilatelicness happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the ballisticness does not occur and/or the drilling heir-at-law does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the prolusoriness happens.; sent6 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that not the cropping but the insufflating Bangladesh happens is not correct.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the insufflating Bangladesh does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the prolusoriness happens and the insufflating Bangladesh does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the ballisticness does not occur and/or that the drilling heir-at-law does not occur is brought about by the aerophilatelicness. sent2: the insufflating Bangladesh does not occur if that not the cropping but the insufflating Bangladesh occurs does not hold. sent3: the reheating FAQ does not occur and the drilling colon does not occur. sent4: that the roasting happens is not wrong if the reheating FAQ does not occur and the drilling colon does not occur. sent5: the prolusoriness occurs if either the ballisticness does not occur or the drilling heir-at-law does not occur or both. sent6: the fact that not the cropping but the insufflating Bangladesh occurs is not right if the souring occurs. sent7: if the roasting occurs the aerophilatelicness happens. sent8: the soured occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the roasting happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the aerophilatelicness happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the ballisticness does not occur and/or the drilling heir-at-law does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the prolusoriness happens.; sent6 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that not the cropping but the insufflating Bangladesh happens is not correct.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the insufflating Bangladesh does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__