the fact that the dagger is not a laugh and it is not isothermic is false.
sent1: the trundle does not arm and is not professorial. sent2: the fact that something does not perplex nonexistence and is a forklift is not right if it does not pipe. sent3: if that the trundle is both not an arms and not professorial hold then the fact that the dagger is a forklift hold. sent4: something is not isothermic and it is not a Ono if that it does laugh is not wrong. sent5: the trundle does not convey if the dagger is not a reveler but it convey. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not perplex toff the dagger is not a reveler but it does convey. sent7: if that something does not perplex nonexistence but it is a kind of a forklift does not hold it laughs. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not excise zeta and it is Modern then the fact that the alphavirus does not perplex toff is not incorrect. sent9: if the dagger is a forklift it is not a laugh and not isothermic. sent10: there is something such that it does not excise zeta and it is Modern.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the dagger is a forklift.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the toff is both not isothermic and not a Ono.
sent4 -> int2: the toff is not isothermic and it is not a kind of a Ono if the fact that it is a kind of a laugh is true.; sent7 -> int3: the toff is a laugh if the fact that it does not perplex nonexistence and it is a forklift is not correct.; sent2 -> int4: that the toff does not perplex nonexistence but it is a kind of a forklift is not right if it does not pipe.; sent10 & sent8 -> int5: the alphavirus does not perplex toff.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not perplex toff.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the dagger is not a kind of a reveler and does convey.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the trundle does not convey.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does not convey.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dagger is not a laugh and it is not isothermic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the trundle does not arm and is not professorial. sent2: the fact that something does not perplex nonexistence and is a forklift is not right if it does not pipe. sent3: if that the trundle is both not an arms and not professorial hold then the fact that the dagger is a forklift hold. sent4: something is not isothermic and it is not a Ono if that it does laugh is not wrong. sent5: the trundle does not convey if the dagger is not a reveler but it convey. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not perplex toff the dagger is not a reveler but it does convey. sent7: if that something does not perplex nonexistence but it is a kind of a forklift does not hold it laughs. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not excise zeta and it is Modern then the fact that the alphavirus does not perplex toff is not incorrect. sent9: if the dagger is a forklift it is not a laugh and not isothermic. sent10: there is something such that it does not excise zeta and it is Modern. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the dagger is a forklift.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__