that the rumba does not occur and the confirmation does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: if the distilling occurs that the polemics does not occur but the medevac happens is not right. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the gathering debarment occurs but the construction does not occur is not wrong does not hold then the medevac occurs. sent3: if the pediatricsness happens then the incontestableness occurs. sent4: if that the sickening metamere does not occur or the rumba does not occur or both is incorrect then the confirmation does not occur. sent5: that the eyedrop and the barring echoing happens is not right. sent6: the fact that the forteness does not occur and the government does not occur does not hold if the peacefulness does not occur. sent7: that the skinny-diping does not occur but the caulineness occurs is not right if the uncovering does not occur. sent8: that either the sickening metamere does not occur or the rumba does not occur or both is not true if the follies does not occur. sent9: the construction does not occur if the fact that the sickening metamere occurs and the gathering debarment happens does not hold. sent10: that the pediatricsness occurs is caused by that the splitsville happens. sent11: if the fact that the smoothening does not occur and the medevac occurs is incorrect the polemics does not occur. sent12: the smoothening triggers that the polemics does not occur. sent13: if the construction happens then the gathering debarment does not occur. sent14: if the transition occurs then the fact that that the internationalization and the athleticness happens is not incorrect is false. sent15: the fact that if the gathering debarment does not occur the fact that that the rumba does not occur but the confirmation happens is not correct is not false is correct. sent16: the smoothening does not occur and/or the pediatricsness does not occur if the incontestableness does not occur. sent17: the suborning progymnosperm does not occur. sent18: the fact that the rumba but not the confirmation happens is not true. sent19: the fact that the sickening metamere does not occur and the intonation occurs is not correct if the lubrication does not occur. sent20: the polemics happens. sent21: if the gathering debarment does not occur that the rumba does not occur and the confirmation does not occur is not true. sent22: if that the smoothening and/or the contestableness happens does not hold then the confirmation does not occur. sent23: the gathering debarment is prevented by either that the splitsville does not occur or the construction or both. sent24: the fact that both the smoothening and the medevac occurs is false if the incontestableness happens. sent25: the distilling happens. sent26: if the medevac happens then the non-incontestableness and/or the polemics happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the splitsville happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the pediatricsness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the incontestableness happens.;
the rumba does not occur and the confirmation does not occur.
sent1 & sent25 -> int3: the fact that the polemics does not occur but the medevac happens is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the rumba does not occur and the confirmation does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the distilling occurs that the polemics does not occur but the medevac happens is not right. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the gathering debarment occurs but the construction does not occur is not wrong does not hold then the medevac occurs. sent3: if the pediatricsness happens then the incontestableness occurs. sent4: if that the sickening metamere does not occur or the rumba does not occur or both is incorrect then the confirmation does not occur. sent5: that the eyedrop and the barring echoing happens is not right. sent6: the fact that the forteness does not occur and the government does not occur does not hold if the peacefulness does not occur. sent7: that the skinny-diping does not occur but the caulineness occurs is not right if the uncovering does not occur. sent8: that either the sickening metamere does not occur or the rumba does not occur or both is not true if the follies does not occur. sent9: the construction does not occur if the fact that the sickening metamere occurs and the gathering debarment happens does not hold. sent10: that the pediatricsness occurs is caused by that the splitsville happens. sent11: if the fact that the smoothening does not occur and the medevac occurs is incorrect the polemics does not occur. sent12: the smoothening triggers that the polemics does not occur. sent13: if the construction happens then the gathering debarment does not occur. sent14: if the transition occurs then the fact that that the internationalization and the athleticness happens is not incorrect is false. sent15: the fact that if the gathering debarment does not occur the fact that that the rumba does not occur but the confirmation happens is not correct is not false is correct. sent16: the smoothening does not occur and/or the pediatricsness does not occur if the incontestableness does not occur. sent17: the suborning progymnosperm does not occur. sent18: the fact that the rumba but not the confirmation happens is not true. sent19: the fact that the sickening metamere does not occur and the intonation occurs is not correct if the lubrication does not occur. sent20: the polemics happens. sent21: if the gathering debarment does not occur that the rumba does not occur and the confirmation does not occur is not true. sent22: if that the smoothening and/or the contestableness happens does not hold then the confirmation does not occur. sent23: the gathering debarment is prevented by either that the splitsville does not occur or the construction or both. sent24: the fact that both the smoothening and the medevac occurs is false if the incontestableness happens. sent25: the distilling happens. sent26: if the medevac happens then the non-incontestableness and/or the polemics happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the splitsville happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the pediatricsness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the incontestableness happens.; __UNKNOWN__