the sandarac is not a bungalow.
sent1: if the quarters is ugly then the fact that it is a kind of non-Puranic thing that is a kind of a Brazilian is not true. sent2: the quarters is a kind of non-Puranic a Brazilian if it is not a kind of a click. sent3: that the sandarac does not dry and is not pyretic is incorrect if the convector is not pyretic. sent4: the quarters is ugly. sent5: The vascularity does not coordinate quarters. sent6: if the quarters does not coordinate vascularity but it does click the convector is not pyretic. sent7: if the fact that something is not a dried and not pyretic is wrong then it is not a bungalow. sent8: the quarters does not coordinate vascularity.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quarters is not a click.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the quarters is not Puranic but it is a kind of a Brazilian.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the quarters is not Puranic but it is a kind of a Brazilian is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the quarters is a click.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the quarters does not coordinate vascularity but it clicks.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the convector is not pyretic.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the sandarac does not dry and it is not pyretic does not hold.; sent7 -> int8: if that the sandarac does not dry and is not pyretic is not true it is not a bungalow.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sandarac is not a bungalow. ; $context$ = sent1: if the quarters is ugly then the fact that it is a kind of non-Puranic thing that is a kind of a Brazilian is not true. sent2: the quarters is a kind of non-Puranic a Brazilian if it is not a kind of a click. sent3: that the sandarac does not dry and is not pyretic is incorrect if the convector is not pyretic. sent4: the quarters is ugly. sent5: The vascularity does not coordinate quarters. sent6: if the quarters does not coordinate vascularity but it does click the convector is not pyretic. sent7: if the fact that something is not a dried and not pyretic is wrong then it is not a bungalow. sent8: the quarters does not coordinate vascularity. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quarters is not a click.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the quarters is not Puranic but it is a kind of a Brazilian.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the quarters is not Puranic but it is a kind of a Brazilian is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the quarters is a click.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the quarters does not coordinate vascularity but it clicks.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the convector is not pyretic.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the sandarac does not dry and it is not pyretic does not hold.; sent7 -> int8: if that the sandarac does not dry and is not pyretic is not true it is not a bungalow.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__