there is something such that it is agrologic.
sent1: that the altimeter is not a dart and it does not disrespect cosmology is not true if it is a kind of a coyness. sent2: the fact that the altimeter is non-corinthian and it does not disrespect antimetabolite does not hold. sent3: the fact that the screening does not imbue and is not bibless is not correct if it is a neurasthenic. sent4: the Pound is not a waxing. sent5: something does not lap orgy if it is not a Merlin. sent6: something does not wax if it does not lap orgy. sent7: everything does not lap orgy. sent8: the dowel is not agrologic. sent9: the altimeter is a kind of a Merlin. sent10: the altimeter is not a leeward. sent11: the fact that the physicist does not lap orgy is not wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of a waxing and it does lap orgy does not hold. sent12: that the altimeter is not agrologic and it is not a waxing is not true if it is a Merlin. sent13: everything does not thread.
sent7 -> int1: the altimeter does not lap orgy.; sent6 -> int2: the altimeter is not a waxing if it does not lap orgy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the altimeter is not a kind of a waxing.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the altimeter is not agrologic.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the altimeter is not agrologic and does not wax.; sent12 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the altimeter is not agrologic and it is not a kind of a waxing does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the altimeter is agrologic.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the physicist is not mature and not a Merlin.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is agrologic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the altimeter is not a dart and it does not disrespect cosmology is not true if it is a kind of a coyness. sent2: the fact that the altimeter is non-corinthian and it does not disrespect antimetabolite does not hold. sent3: the fact that the screening does not imbue and is not bibless is not correct if it is a neurasthenic. sent4: the Pound is not a waxing. sent5: something does not lap orgy if it is not a Merlin. sent6: something does not wax if it does not lap orgy. sent7: everything does not lap orgy. sent8: the dowel is not agrologic. sent9: the altimeter is a kind of a Merlin. sent10: the altimeter is not a leeward. sent11: the fact that the physicist does not lap orgy is not wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of a waxing and it does lap orgy does not hold. sent12: that the altimeter is not agrologic and it is not a waxing is not true if it is a Merlin. sent13: everything does not thread. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the altimeter does not lap orgy.; sent6 -> int2: the altimeter is not a waxing if it does not lap orgy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the altimeter is not a kind of a waxing.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the altimeter is not agrologic.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the altimeter is not agrologic and does not wax.; sent12 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the altimeter is not agrologic and it is not a kind of a waxing does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the altimeter is agrologic.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__