that the Son is not a gilder hold.
sent1: something is not a blaster but it is royal if it does not trip transmittance. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a gestalt and trips transmittance is not correct it does not trips transmittance. sent3: the father is not unsensational and it is not a ninth if the chondrule is not a kind of a royal. sent4: if the neglecter does not trip Son then the maser is not undeniable. sent5: if the father is not unsensational and is not a kind of a ninth that the Son is not a kind of a gilder is not wrong. sent6: either something is not a kind of a godliness or it is not a globalization or both if it miscarries echo. sent7: that the geek is a gilder is not false if the fact that the fact that the father is non-unsensational thing that is a gilder is correct is incorrect. sent8: that something is not unsensational but it is a kind of a gilder is not right if the fact that it is not a ninth is not correct. sent9: the fact that the father is not a kind of a ninth but it is not non-royal is false. sent10: there exists something such that it is unsensational. sent11: if there is something such that it is not unsensational then the fact that the father is not a kind of a ninth and is royal is not true. sent12: if the neglecter is not a kind of a malformation the maser is not undeniable. sent13: there exists something such that it is not unsensational. sent14: the Pastor miscarries echo and is not a remount. sent15: if the maser is a gestalt and it is minus the diptych is not a gestalt. sent16: if the estrone is not a blaster and is a kind of a royal the chondrule is not a kind of a royal. sent17: if the fact that the Pastor does Frenchify liniment is false the neglecter is not a malformation and/or it does not trip Son. sent18: the Son is a kind of a gilder if the fact that the father is not a ninth and it is not a royal does not hold. sent19: if something is not a godliness and/or it is not a globalization then it does not Frenchify liniment. sent20: that the father is a ninth but it is not a kind of a royal is not right. sent21: if there is something such that it is not unsensational then that the father is not a ninth and it is not a royal is wrong. sent22: the fact that the father is a ninth and not royal is not true if there is something such that it is not unsensational. sent23: if something is not undeniable then it is both a gestalt and minus.
sent13 & sent21 -> int1: the fact that the father is not a ninth but non-royal is not right.; sent18 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the geek is a kind of a gilder.
sent8 -> int2: that the Son is not unsensational but it is a gilder does not hold if it is a ninth.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Son is not a gilder hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a blaster but it is royal if it does not trip transmittance. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a gestalt and trips transmittance is not correct it does not trips transmittance. sent3: the father is not unsensational and it is not a ninth if the chondrule is not a kind of a royal. sent4: if the neglecter does not trip Son then the maser is not undeniable. sent5: if the father is not unsensational and is not a kind of a ninth that the Son is not a kind of a gilder is not wrong. sent6: either something is not a kind of a godliness or it is not a globalization or both if it miscarries echo. sent7: that the geek is a gilder is not false if the fact that the fact that the father is non-unsensational thing that is a gilder is correct is incorrect. sent8: that something is not unsensational but it is a kind of a gilder is not right if the fact that it is not a ninth is not correct. sent9: the fact that the father is not a kind of a ninth but it is not non-royal is false. sent10: there exists something such that it is unsensational. sent11: if there is something such that it is not unsensational then the fact that the father is not a kind of a ninth and is royal is not true. sent12: if the neglecter is not a kind of a malformation the maser is not undeniable. sent13: there exists something such that it is not unsensational. sent14: the Pastor miscarries echo and is not a remount. sent15: if the maser is a gestalt and it is minus the diptych is not a gestalt. sent16: if the estrone is not a blaster and is a kind of a royal the chondrule is not a kind of a royal. sent17: if the fact that the Pastor does Frenchify liniment is false the neglecter is not a malformation and/or it does not trip Son. sent18: the Son is a kind of a gilder if the fact that the father is not a ninth and it is not a royal does not hold. sent19: if something is not a godliness and/or it is not a globalization then it does not Frenchify liniment. sent20: that the father is a ninth but it is not a kind of a royal is not right. sent21: if there is something such that it is not unsensational then that the father is not a ninth and it is not a royal is wrong. sent22: the fact that the father is a ninth and not royal is not true if there is something such that it is not unsensational. sent23: if something is not undeniable then it is both a gestalt and minus. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent21 -> int1: the fact that the father is not a ninth but non-royal is not right.; sent18 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__