that there exists something such that if it is not a nanomia then the fact that it buries surplice and is not paradigmatic is false does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not Djiboutian the fact that it is a blog and is improper is not true. sent2: if the snuffler is paradigmatic then that it is a past and it is not atomic is not right. sent3: if the snuffler is not a seatbelt the fact that it abuses Merrimack and it does not bury surplice is not correct. sent4: if the surplice is a nanomia the fact that it uploads and is not a Beguine does not hold. sent5: that the snuffler does bury surplice and it is paradigmatic is not correct if it is not a nanomia. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not abuse Merrimack it is a kind of an opened that is not prosthodontic. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a rubbing that it is atomic and not a shadowing does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not an abdominal then it is a kind of a jiggermast that is not a narrowing. sent9: if the reactor is not perithelial it is an evergreen and it is not a kind of an aftereffect. sent10: the snuffler is uneasy but it is not a Kropotkin if it is not paradigmatic. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a taper then it does ruin and it does not ladle toilet. sent12: if the snuffler is a kind of a seer the fact that it is a cramped and is not paradigmatic is not right. sent13: that something diverts but it is not paradigmatic does not hold if it does not sporulate. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not flee then the fact that it does bury snuffler and does not laud is false. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not nonslippery the fact that it is neural and it is a Perdix is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the snuffler does bury surplice but it is not paradigmatic is not correct if it is not a nanomia. sent17: there exists something such that if it is neural the fact that it does stargaze and it is not a splurge is incorrect. sent18: the snuffler is a kind of a nanomia but it is not a fez if it is not a tine. sent19: there is something such that if it does not flee it is a kind of a misfire and it is not a kind of a Algonquian. sent20: there exists something such that if it is not uneasy then it ladles powderpuff and is not appellative.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
that the snuffler diverts but it is not paradigmatic is wrong if it does not sporulate.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a nanomia then the fact that it buries surplice and is not paradigmatic is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not Djiboutian the fact that it is a blog and is improper is not true. sent2: if the snuffler is paradigmatic then that it is a past and it is not atomic is not right. sent3: if the snuffler is not a seatbelt the fact that it abuses Merrimack and it does not bury surplice is not correct. sent4: if the surplice is a nanomia the fact that it uploads and is not a Beguine does not hold. sent5: that the snuffler does bury surplice and it is paradigmatic is not correct if it is not a nanomia. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not abuse Merrimack it is a kind of an opened that is not prosthodontic. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a rubbing that it is atomic and not a shadowing does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not an abdominal then it is a kind of a jiggermast that is not a narrowing. sent9: if the reactor is not perithelial it is an evergreen and it is not a kind of an aftereffect. sent10: the snuffler is uneasy but it is not a Kropotkin if it is not paradigmatic. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a taper then it does ruin and it does not ladle toilet. sent12: if the snuffler is a kind of a seer the fact that it is a cramped and is not paradigmatic is not right. sent13: that something diverts but it is not paradigmatic does not hold if it does not sporulate. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not flee then the fact that it does bury snuffler and does not laud is false. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not nonslippery the fact that it is neural and it is a Perdix is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the snuffler does bury surplice but it is not paradigmatic is not correct if it is not a nanomia. sent17: there exists something such that if it is neural the fact that it does stargaze and it is not a splurge is incorrect. sent18: the snuffler is a kind of a nanomia but it is not a fez if it is not a tine. sent19: there is something such that if it does not flee it is a kind of a misfire and it is not a kind of a Algonquian. sent20: there exists something such that if it is not uneasy then it ladles powderpuff and is not appellative. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__