the bursa is not odds and does not chop.
sent1: if the Vaseline is not a chop then the bursa is not a hydrolysate. sent2: if the bindery is not a monolatry then the Vaseline is a monolatry and not a hydrolysate. sent3: there exists something such that it circumvallates actinoid. sent4: that the bindery is not a monolatry is right if there exists something such that the fact that either it does not squish bursa or it is viviparous or both is not right. sent5: something is not nonadsorbent if it is a monolatry and it is not a hydrolysate. sent6: the bindery is not a hydrolysate. sent7: if the bindery is a kind of nonadsorbent thing that is not odds it is not a kind of a monolatry. sent8: the bursa does not squish bursa if the lacing is not a chop. sent9: the bursa is both not a chop and not a monolatry. sent10: the fact that the fact that the lacing does not squish bursa or it is viviparous or both is wrong is true. sent11: the bursa is a kind of non-odds thing that does not chop if the Vaseline is not nonadsorbent. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a tenantry and/or squishes disproportion does not hold. sent13: there is something such that that either it does not busk or it is an inefficiency or both is not correct.
sent10 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not squish bursa and/or is viviparous is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the bindery is not a monolatry.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Vaseline is both a monolatry and not a hydrolysate.; sent5 -> int4: the Vaseline is not nonadsorbent if it is both a monolatry and not a hydrolysate.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Vaseline is not nonadsorbent.; int5 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bursa is not odds and does not chop. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Vaseline is not a chop then the bursa is not a hydrolysate. sent2: if the bindery is not a monolatry then the Vaseline is a monolatry and not a hydrolysate. sent3: there exists something such that it circumvallates actinoid. sent4: that the bindery is not a monolatry is right if there exists something such that the fact that either it does not squish bursa or it is viviparous or both is not right. sent5: something is not nonadsorbent if it is a monolatry and it is not a hydrolysate. sent6: the bindery is not a hydrolysate. sent7: if the bindery is a kind of nonadsorbent thing that is not odds it is not a kind of a monolatry. sent8: the bursa does not squish bursa if the lacing is not a chop. sent9: the bursa is both not a chop and not a monolatry. sent10: the fact that the fact that the lacing does not squish bursa or it is viviparous or both is wrong is true. sent11: the bursa is a kind of non-odds thing that does not chop if the Vaseline is not nonadsorbent. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a tenantry and/or squishes disproportion does not hold. sent13: there is something such that that either it does not busk or it is an inefficiency or both is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not squish bursa and/or is viviparous is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the bindery is not a monolatry.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Vaseline is both a monolatry and not a hydrolysate.; sent5 -> int4: the Vaseline is not nonadsorbent if it is both a monolatry and not a hydrolysate.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Vaseline is not nonadsorbent.; int5 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__