the dicotyledonousness occurs.
sent1: the fact that not the satisfaction but the decoying Dolichonyx occurs is wrong if the Revelation happens. sent2: that the sterilizing vinegar occurs is right. sent3: the foaling holder occurs if the archegonialness happens. sent4: if the venting abelia does not occur then the roasting happens. sent5: the sterilizing tahini happens. sent6: the Chinaman occurs and the appendectomy happens. sent7: if the revolutionariness does not occur then not the satisfaction but the decoying Dolichonyx occurs. sent8: the sterilizing mid-water occurs. sent9: the satisfaction does not occur. sent10: that the decoying equatability does not occur brings about that both the decoying alidade and the Revelation occurs. sent11: that the satisfaction does not occur is correct if the revolutionariness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the decoying Google does not occur but the Gambianness occurs is false. sent13: the roasting happens. sent14: the heave occurs and the trust occurs. sent15: the vitality does not occur. sent16: the maternalness occurs. sent17: the tacticalness does not occur. sent18: the decoying equatability does not occur. sent19: the dicotyledonousness does not occur and the venting abelia does not occur if the satisfaction happens. sent20: if the Goetheanness happens then that not the ichthyolatry but the reference happens is wrong. sent21: the roasting and the non-revolutionariness happens if the venting abelia does not occur. sent22: if the neutering happens the dicotyledonousness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the venting abelia does not occur.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the roasting happens but the revolutionariness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the revolutionariness does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: not the satisfaction but the decoying Dolichonyx happens.; sent10 & sent18 -> int4: both the decoying alidade and the Revelation occurs.; int4 -> int5: the Revelation happens.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: that the satisfaction does not occur but the decoying Dolichonyx happens is false.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the venting abelia occurs.;
the dicotyledonousness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the dicotyledonousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the satisfaction but the decoying Dolichonyx occurs is wrong if the Revelation happens. sent2: that the sterilizing vinegar occurs is right. sent3: the foaling holder occurs if the archegonialness happens. sent4: if the venting abelia does not occur then the roasting happens. sent5: the sterilizing tahini happens. sent6: the Chinaman occurs and the appendectomy happens. sent7: if the revolutionariness does not occur then not the satisfaction but the decoying Dolichonyx occurs. sent8: the sterilizing mid-water occurs. sent9: the satisfaction does not occur. sent10: that the decoying equatability does not occur brings about that both the decoying alidade and the Revelation occurs. sent11: that the satisfaction does not occur is correct if the revolutionariness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the decoying Google does not occur but the Gambianness occurs is false. sent13: the roasting happens. sent14: the heave occurs and the trust occurs. sent15: the vitality does not occur. sent16: the maternalness occurs. sent17: the tacticalness does not occur. sent18: the decoying equatability does not occur. sent19: the dicotyledonousness does not occur and the venting abelia does not occur if the satisfaction happens. sent20: if the Goetheanness happens then that not the ichthyolatry but the reference happens is wrong. sent21: the roasting and the non-revolutionariness happens if the venting abelia does not occur. sent22: if the neutering happens the dicotyledonousness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the venting abelia does not occur.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the roasting happens but the revolutionariness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the revolutionariness does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: not the satisfaction but the decoying Dolichonyx happens.; sent10 & sent18 -> int4: both the decoying alidade and the Revelation occurs.; int4 -> int5: the Revelation happens.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: that the satisfaction does not occur but the decoying Dolichonyx happens is false.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the venting abelia occurs.; __UNKNOWN__