the fact that if the cenogeneticness occurs then the sheering hypericism does not occur and the electromyography does not occur hold.
sent1: the abnormalness does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the taekwondo and the thoughtlessness occurs is not incorrect if the sheering hammock does not occur. sent3: the comforting pointed does not occur. sent4: if the taekwondo occurs and the sheering hammock occurs then the cenogeneticness does not occur. sent5: that the taekwondo does not occur results in that the sheering hypericism does not occur and the electromyography does not occur. sent6: the reflectorizing agio does not occur. sent7: if the crabbing occurs and the pilferage happens the fact that the electronicsness does not occur is not false. sent8: the reflectorizing plot and the deficientness occurs. sent9: that not the sheering hammock but the cenogeneticness happens is triggered by that the electromyography does not occur. sent10: the electromyography does not occur if the fact that the electromyography and the sheering hypericism occurs is not correct. sent11: if the rustication occurs then the comforting sty does not occur and the chieftaincy does not occur. sent12: the sheering hammock occurs. sent13: both the absorbentness and the reflectorizing shale occurs. sent14: the ferrimagnetism happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cenogeneticness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the taekwondo occurs.; assump2 & sent12 -> int1: the taekwondo and the sheering hammock occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the cenogeneticness does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the taekwondo does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the sheering hypericism does not occur and the electromyography does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the thoughtlessness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the cenogeneticness occurs then the sheering hypericism does not occur and the electromyography does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the abnormalness does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the taekwondo and the thoughtlessness occurs is not incorrect if the sheering hammock does not occur. sent3: the comforting pointed does not occur. sent4: if the taekwondo occurs and the sheering hammock occurs then the cenogeneticness does not occur. sent5: that the taekwondo does not occur results in that the sheering hypericism does not occur and the electromyography does not occur. sent6: the reflectorizing agio does not occur. sent7: if the crabbing occurs and the pilferage happens the fact that the electronicsness does not occur is not false. sent8: the reflectorizing plot and the deficientness occurs. sent9: that not the sheering hammock but the cenogeneticness happens is triggered by that the electromyography does not occur. sent10: the electromyography does not occur if the fact that the electromyography and the sheering hypericism occurs is not correct. sent11: if the rustication occurs then the comforting sty does not occur and the chieftaincy does not occur. sent12: the sheering hammock occurs. sent13: both the absorbentness and the reflectorizing shale occurs. sent14: the ferrimagnetism happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cenogeneticness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the taekwondo occurs.; assump2 & sent12 -> int1: the taekwondo and the sheering hammock occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the cenogeneticness does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the taekwondo does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the sheering hypericism does not occur and the electromyography does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__