the stewardess is not an ache.
sent1: if the tilter is a shadowing the fact that the loir is postmortem and not an ache is not true. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the pollack is a kind of a shadowing that does not speak isohel is not wrong does not hold then the stewardess does not ache. sent3: the tilter is a abducent. sent4: that the pollack is a shadowing but it does not speak isohel is false if the loir does not shadowing. sent5: something that speaks isohel and/or is non-abducent is a shadowing.
the fact that the loir is postmortem and not an ache does not hold.
sent5 -> int1: if the tilter speaks isohel and/or it is not abducent then it shadows.;
$hypothesis$ = the stewardess is not an ache. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tilter is a shadowing the fact that the loir is postmortem and not an ache is not true. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the pollack is a kind of a shadowing that does not speak isohel is not wrong does not hold then the stewardess does not ache. sent3: the tilter is a abducent. sent4: that the pollack is a shadowing but it does not speak isohel is false if the loir does not shadowing. sent5: something that speaks isohel and/or is non-abducent is a shadowing. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__