there exists something such that it is both a liner and due.
sent1: the outpatient opens if the sprigtail is a touchline. sent2: if that something does not bonnet mastering is right it is a draftee. sent3: that the knackwurst is a draftee and/or is a Physeter is not incorrect. sent4: there exists nothing such that it does bonnet mastering and it is not a voussoir. sent5: if the outpatient does open that the ponce does not open but it does bonnet mastering does not hold. sent6: if the ponce is not a liner then the hypochondrium is a liner that is due. sent7: if the fact that something does not grease oral is not false it is a touchline. sent8: if the fact that something is not a liner hold then the fact that it does grease oral and is a touchline is wrong. sent9: the knackwurst is not a touchline. sent10: if the fact that something is not a kind of an opening but it does bonnet mastering is not true then it is not a liner. sent11: there is something such that it clears hairlessness. sent12: the fact that the sprigtail does not grease oral is correct if the knackwurst is a kind of a draftee and/or it is a Physeter.
sent12 & sent3 -> int1: the sprigtail does not grease oral.; sent7 -> int2: if the sprigtail does not grease oral then it is a kind of a touchline.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sprigtail is a touchline.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the outpatient is an opening.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the ponce is non-opening thing that does bonnet mastering is false.; sent10 -> int6: if the fact that the ponce is not an opening but it bonnets mastering is not right it is not a liner.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the ponce is not a liner is not wrong.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the hypochondrium is a kind of a liner that is a due.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Reynard is not an opening is true.
sent8 -> int9: that the knackwurst greases oral and it is a kind of a touchline is not right if it is not a liner.; sent4 -> int10: that the sprigtail bonnets mastering but it is not a voussoir is not right.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it bonnets mastering and is not a voussoir is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is both a liner and due. ; $context$ = sent1: the outpatient opens if the sprigtail is a touchline. sent2: if that something does not bonnet mastering is right it is a draftee. sent3: that the knackwurst is a draftee and/or is a Physeter is not incorrect. sent4: there exists nothing such that it does bonnet mastering and it is not a voussoir. sent5: if the outpatient does open that the ponce does not open but it does bonnet mastering does not hold. sent6: if the ponce is not a liner then the hypochondrium is a liner that is due. sent7: if the fact that something does not grease oral is not false it is a touchline. sent8: if the fact that something is not a liner hold then the fact that it does grease oral and is a touchline is wrong. sent9: the knackwurst is not a touchline. sent10: if the fact that something is not a kind of an opening but it does bonnet mastering is not true then it is not a liner. sent11: there is something such that it clears hairlessness. sent12: the fact that the sprigtail does not grease oral is correct if the knackwurst is a kind of a draftee and/or it is a Physeter. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent3 -> int1: the sprigtail does not grease oral.; sent7 -> int2: if the sprigtail does not grease oral then it is a kind of a touchline.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sprigtail is a touchline.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the outpatient is an opening.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the ponce is non-opening thing that does bonnet mastering is false.; sent10 -> int6: if the fact that the ponce is not an opening but it bonnets mastering is not right it is not a liner.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the ponce is not a liner is not wrong.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the hypochondrium is a kind of a liner that is a due.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__