the gazebo is not a kind of a potamogale.
sent1: if that something is a kind of mucopurulent thing that is amoebic is not correct it is not amoebic. sent2: the A-line is not a prate if it labors A-line and it does rehabilitate Reagan. sent3: there is something such that it is not a cockscomb. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a cockscomb or it does not tamper or both is wrong. sent5: either something is amoebic or it is not a potamogale or both. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is a cockscomb and/or does not tamper is false the A-line is amoebic. sent7: if the A-line is amoebic then the gazebo is a potamogale. sent8: the fact that the fact that something is both mucopurulent and amoebic is not incorrect does not hold if it is not a kind of a prate. sent9: if the A-line labors gazebo or it is not amoebic or both then the fact that the gazebo is not a kind of a potamogale is not false. sent10: there is something such that it either is a kind of a potamogale or is not amoebic or both.
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the A-line is amoebic.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the gazebo is not a potamogale.
sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the A-line is mucopurulent and is amoebic is not correct then it is not amoebic.; sent8 -> int3: if the A-line is not a prate that it is both mucopurulent and amoebic is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the gazebo is not a kind of a potamogale. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a kind of mucopurulent thing that is amoebic is not correct it is not amoebic. sent2: the A-line is not a prate if it labors A-line and it does rehabilitate Reagan. sent3: there is something such that it is not a cockscomb. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a cockscomb or it does not tamper or both is wrong. sent5: either something is amoebic or it is not a potamogale or both. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is a cockscomb and/or does not tamper is false the A-line is amoebic. sent7: if the A-line is amoebic then the gazebo is a potamogale. sent8: the fact that the fact that something is both mucopurulent and amoebic is not incorrect does not hold if it is not a kind of a prate. sent9: if the A-line labors gazebo or it is not amoebic or both then the fact that the gazebo is not a kind of a potamogale is not false. sent10: there is something such that it either is a kind of a potamogale or is not amoebic or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the A-line is amoebic.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__