there is something such that if it is not a deodorant that it does not dim square and it is obligatory is not correct.
sent1: the fact that something is not wintry but inconvenient is not right if it is not an inactivity. sent2: the fact that the shotgun does dim square and is obligatory does not hold if it is not a kind of a deodorant. sent3: that something does not dim square but it is obligatory is wrong if it is a deodorant. sent4: if the shotgun is a deodorant the fact that that it does not dim square and is obligatory is not false is not correct. sent5: if the shotgun does not dim square that it is not a GPA and farms does not hold. sent6: if the shotgun is not a kind of a deodorant it does not dim square and it is obligatory. sent7: something does not dim square but it is obligatory if it is not a deodorant. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a deodorant then that it does not dim square and is obligatory is not right. sent9: there is something such that if it does not dim oryx then that it is not pistillate and it does farm is wrong. sent10: the fact that something does not eviscerate but it is a Capek is not right if it is not a sexpot. sent11: that the quartering does not trice Circumcision but it is a kind of a Lyly is not true if it is not antemortem. sent12: that something dims square and it is obligatory is not right if it is not a deodorant. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not occult Helodermatidae then that it is not a cryobiology and it is cytoplastic is not true. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a paisa then that it is not a Wyomingite and is a tagasaste is not correct. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a deodorant then it does not dim square and it is obligatory. sent16: that the shotgun does not occult fad but it is obligatory is not true if it does not dim eschatology. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a deodorant the fact that it does dim square and is obligatory does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a deodorant that it does not dim square and it is obligatory is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not wintry but inconvenient is not right if it is not an inactivity. sent2: the fact that the shotgun does dim square and is obligatory does not hold if it is not a kind of a deodorant. sent3: that something does not dim square but it is obligatory is wrong if it is a deodorant. sent4: if the shotgun is a deodorant the fact that that it does not dim square and is obligatory is not false is not correct. sent5: if the shotgun does not dim square that it is not a GPA and farms does not hold. sent6: if the shotgun is not a kind of a deodorant it does not dim square and it is obligatory. sent7: something does not dim square but it is obligatory if it is not a deodorant. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a deodorant then that it does not dim square and is obligatory is not right. sent9: there is something such that if it does not dim oryx then that it is not pistillate and it does farm is wrong. sent10: the fact that something does not eviscerate but it is a Capek is not right if it is not a sexpot. sent11: that the quartering does not trice Circumcision but it is a kind of a Lyly is not true if it is not antemortem. sent12: that something dims square and it is obligatory is not right if it is not a deodorant. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not occult Helodermatidae then that it is not a cryobiology and it is cytoplastic is not true. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a paisa then that it is not a Wyomingite and is a tagasaste is not correct. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a deodorant then it does not dim square and it is obligatory. sent16: that the shotgun does not occult fad but it is obligatory is not true if it does not dim eschatology. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a deodorant the fact that it does dim square and is obligatory does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__