the anus is unobtrusive and is a Sangay.
sent1: the anus does not distinguish agnathan. sent2: that the jampot is manageable and it is awnless is incorrect. sent3: the embellishment is not a excrescence but fisheye. sent4: that something is unobtrusive and it is a Sangay does not hold if it is not awnless. sent5: the jampot is a kind of a Sangay if that it is not unobtrusive and it is awnless is incorrect. sent6: that the jampot is not unmanageable and is awnless does not hold if the sauce-alone is not awnless. sent7: if something is not awnless but it is manageable the anus is not unobtrusive. sent8: the jampot transacts and is a kind of a Sangay. sent9: the anus is unobtrusive if it distinguishes agnathan. sent10: if the fact that the anus does not distinguish agnathan and is tensional is incorrect then it is unobtrusive. sent11: the fact that the anus distinguishes agnathan and is tensional is not true. sent12: if the sauce-alone is not awnless then that the jampot is unmanageable thing that is awnless is false. sent13: the topee is a Sangay. sent14: the sauce-alone is not awnless if something does not distinguish agnathan and is tensional. sent15: there is something such that it does not distinguish agnathan. sent16: if something that does distinguish agnathan is tensional the sauce-alone is not awnless. sent17: the Hungarian is both not gyroscopic and manageable. sent18: the jampot is not manageable. sent19: the anus does not distinguish agnathan and is logogrammatic. sent20: the anus is a kind of a Sangay. sent21: the jampot is not manageable but awnless.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anus does not distinguish agnathan but it is tensional.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it does not distinguish agnathan and is tensional.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the sauce-alone is not awnless.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the jampot is not manageable and is awnless does not hold.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the anus does not distinguish agnathan but it is tensional is not correct.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the anus is unobtrusive.; int6 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the anus is unobtrusive and it is a Sangay does not hold.
sent4 -> int7: if the anus is not awnless then that it is unobtrusive and a Sangay is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the anus is unobtrusive and is a Sangay. ; $context$ = sent1: the anus does not distinguish agnathan. sent2: that the jampot is manageable and it is awnless is incorrect. sent3: the embellishment is not a excrescence but fisheye. sent4: that something is unobtrusive and it is a Sangay does not hold if it is not awnless. sent5: the jampot is a kind of a Sangay if that it is not unobtrusive and it is awnless is incorrect. sent6: that the jampot is not unmanageable and is awnless does not hold if the sauce-alone is not awnless. sent7: if something is not awnless but it is manageable the anus is not unobtrusive. sent8: the jampot transacts and is a kind of a Sangay. sent9: the anus is unobtrusive if it distinguishes agnathan. sent10: if the fact that the anus does not distinguish agnathan and is tensional is incorrect then it is unobtrusive. sent11: the fact that the anus distinguishes agnathan and is tensional is not true. sent12: if the sauce-alone is not awnless then that the jampot is unmanageable thing that is awnless is false. sent13: the topee is a Sangay. sent14: the sauce-alone is not awnless if something does not distinguish agnathan and is tensional. sent15: there is something such that it does not distinguish agnathan. sent16: if something that does distinguish agnathan is tensional the sauce-alone is not awnless. sent17: the Hungarian is both not gyroscopic and manageable. sent18: the jampot is not manageable. sent19: the anus does not distinguish agnathan and is logogrammatic. sent20: the anus is a kind of a Sangay. sent21: the jampot is not manageable but awnless. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anus does not distinguish agnathan but it is tensional.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it does not distinguish agnathan and is tensional.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the sauce-alone is not awnless.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the jampot is not manageable and is awnless does not hold.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the anus does not distinguish agnathan but it is tensional is not correct.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the anus is unobtrusive.; int6 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__