the crossover is both not a crumpet and a station.
sent1: if the crossover jazzes handstand it stations. sent2: the crossover is not a kind of a crumpet if something does not wrest Guarnerius but it is unipolar. sent3: the thick-knee does not whistle if that the homeroom is numeric and is abstemious is not correct. sent4: the churchyard is nonpasserine if the fact that the krigia is a rubbing is correct. sent5: the thick-knee is a whistling if that the churchyard is a whistling and not a deduction is not right. sent6: the fact that the churchyard is a kind of a whistling but it is not a deduction is not right if it is nonpasserine. sent7: the fact that something is numeric and it is abstemious is false if it is non-corneal. sent8: the bryophyte does not wrest Guarnerius and is unipolar. sent9: the fact that the krigia is a rubbing is not wrong.
sent7 -> int1: if the homeroom is not corneal then that it is numeric and it is abstemious is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the homeroom is not corneal.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the homeroom is both numeric and abstemious is not correct.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the thick-knee is not a whistling.; sent4 & sent9 -> int4: that the churchyard is nonpasserine is right.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: that the churchyard is both a whistling and not a deduction does not hold.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the thick-knee does whistle hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the homeroom is corneal.; sent8 -> int9: something does not wrest Guarnerius and is unipolar.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the crossover is not a crumpet.;
$hypothesis$ = the crossover is both not a crumpet and a station. ; $context$ = sent1: if the crossover jazzes handstand it stations. sent2: the crossover is not a kind of a crumpet if something does not wrest Guarnerius but it is unipolar. sent3: the thick-knee does not whistle if that the homeroom is numeric and is abstemious is not correct. sent4: the churchyard is nonpasserine if the fact that the krigia is a rubbing is correct. sent5: the thick-knee is a whistling if that the churchyard is a whistling and not a deduction is not right. sent6: the fact that the churchyard is a kind of a whistling but it is not a deduction is not right if it is nonpasserine. sent7: the fact that something is numeric and it is abstemious is false if it is non-corneal. sent8: the bryophyte does not wrest Guarnerius and is unipolar. sent9: the fact that the krigia is a rubbing is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the homeroom is not corneal then that it is numeric and it is abstemious is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the homeroom is not corneal.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the homeroom is both numeric and abstemious is not correct.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the thick-knee is not a whistling.; sent4 & sent9 -> int4: that the churchyard is nonpasserine is right.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: that the churchyard is both a whistling and not a deduction does not hold.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the thick-knee does whistle hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the homeroom is corneal.; sent8 -> int9: something does not wrest Guarnerius and is unipolar.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the crossover is not a crumpet.; __UNKNOWN__