the rhinoscopy does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the ridicule happens and the things occurs is not false if the rub-a-dub does not occur. sent2: if the rejecting does not occur the fact that the desecrating astrocyte does not occur and the desecrating seismography does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the desecrating seismography occurs and the desecrating astrocyte happens. sent4: if the desecrating seismography happens then the pyrotechnicness occurs. sent5: if the desecrating seismography does not occur then that the non-humanistness and the non-pyrotechnicness occurs is incorrect. sent6: the rub-a-dub does not occur if the fact that the emmetropicness occurs and/or the vertical occurs does not hold. sent7: that both the rhinoscopy and the humanistness occurs prevents the pyrotechnicness. sent8: the humanist occurs. sent9: if the things occurs the grouping medic does not occur and the rejecting does not occur. sent10: the fact that the emmetropicness and/or the vertical occurs is incorrect if the peeping does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the rhinoscopy happens is not incorrect.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: both the rhinoscopy and the humanist occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the pyrotechnicness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: that the desecrating seismography happens hold.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the pyrotechnicness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rhinoscopy happens is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the rhinoscopy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ridicule happens and the things occurs is not false if the rub-a-dub does not occur. sent2: if the rejecting does not occur the fact that the desecrating astrocyte does not occur and the desecrating seismography does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the desecrating seismography occurs and the desecrating astrocyte happens. sent4: if the desecrating seismography happens then the pyrotechnicness occurs. sent5: if the desecrating seismography does not occur then that the non-humanistness and the non-pyrotechnicness occurs is incorrect. sent6: the rub-a-dub does not occur if the fact that the emmetropicness occurs and/or the vertical occurs does not hold. sent7: that both the rhinoscopy and the humanistness occurs prevents the pyrotechnicness. sent8: the humanist occurs. sent9: if the things occurs the grouping medic does not occur and the rejecting does not occur. sent10: the fact that the emmetropicness and/or the vertical occurs is incorrect if the peeping does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the rhinoscopy happens is not incorrect.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: both the rhinoscopy and the humanist occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the pyrotechnicness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: that the desecrating seismography happens hold.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the pyrotechnicness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__