the servant is not a telco and is not a Briton.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not grass that the fact that the caltrop does elute Leviticus and is not a uninterestingness does not hold is not false. sent2: if something is not a kind of a paraphilia then it is not a telco. sent3: the caltrop does not stopper if there is something such that that it is a uninterestingness and/or it is a kind of a Jynx is not right. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of a telco and it is not a Briton is incorrect if the fact that it is not a paraphilia is not incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that it does not grass. sent6: the servant is not a kind of a telco. sent7: the servant is not a telco and it is not a kind of a Briton if the caltrop is not a telco. sent8: if the caltrop is a paraphilia it stoppers. sent9: there is something such that that it is either a uninterestingness or a Jynx or both is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the caltrop is a kind of a paraphilia hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the caltrop is a stopper.; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: the caltrop is not a stopper.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the caltrop is not a kind of a paraphilia.; sent2 -> int5: the caltrop is not a telco if it is not a paraphilia.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the caltrop is not a telco.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the servant is both not a telco and not Briton is not correct.
sent4 -> int7: that the servant is not a telco and it is not a Briton does not hold if it is not a paraphilia.; sent5 & sent1 -> int8: the fact that the caltrop does elute Leviticus but it is not a uninterestingness is not true.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it elutes Leviticus and it is not a uninterestingness does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the servant is not a telco and is not a Briton. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not grass that the fact that the caltrop does elute Leviticus and is not a uninterestingness does not hold is not false. sent2: if something is not a kind of a paraphilia then it is not a telco. sent3: the caltrop does not stopper if there is something such that that it is a uninterestingness and/or it is a kind of a Jynx is not right. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of a telco and it is not a Briton is incorrect if the fact that it is not a paraphilia is not incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that it does not grass. sent6: the servant is not a kind of a telco. sent7: the servant is not a telco and it is not a kind of a Briton if the caltrop is not a telco. sent8: if the caltrop is a paraphilia it stoppers. sent9: there is something such that that it is either a uninterestingness or a Jynx or both is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the caltrop is a kind of a paraphilia hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the caltrop is a stopper.; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: the caltrop is not a stopper.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the caltrop is not a kind of a paraphilia.; sent2 -> int5: the caltrop is not a telco if it is not a paraphilia.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the caltrop is not a telco.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__