that the applicator is a precipitator and/or it does whelp denominator is not true.
sent1: the toyshop does kidnap sereness if there exists something such that that it is both a screening and a drug is incorrect. sent2: if something grimaces then it is a rhododendron. sent3: if the accretion does not whelp denominator the applicator is a precipitator and/or it whelp denominator. sent4: the toyshop hurts. sent5: there exists something such that that it is a screening and drugs is not right. sent6: the evangelist is not a kind of a rhododendron if the toyshop hurts and does not whelp distention. sent7: that the redpoll is not a grimace or it is cardiopulmonary or both does not hold. sent8: if there is something such that it does whelp distention and it does kidnap sereness the accretion does not whelp denominator. sent9: the fact that the applicator is a precipitator or it does whelp denominator or both is false if the toyshop does not hurt. sent10: if the fact that the redpoll is not a grimace and/or it is not non-cardiopulmonary is false then the evangelist does grimace.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toyshop does not whelp distention.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the toyshop does hurt but it does not whelp distention.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the evangelist is not a kind of a rhododendron.; sent2 -> int3: if the evangelist does grimace then it is a rhododendron.; sent10 & sent7 -> int4: the evangelist is a kind of a grimace.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the evangelist is a rhododendron is not wrong.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the toyshop does whelp distention.; sent5 & sent1 -> int8: the toyshop kidnaps sereness.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the toyshop does whelp distention and does kidnap sereness.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it does whelp distention and it does kidnap sereness.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the accretion does not whelp denominator.; int11 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
that the applicator is a kind of a precipitator and/or it does whelp denominator is false.
$hypothesis$ = that the applicator is a precipitator and/or it does whelp denominator is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the toyshop does kidnap sereness if there exists something such that that it is both a screening and a drug is incorrect. sent2: if something grimaces then it is a rhododendron. sent3: if the accretion does not whelp denominator the applicator is a precipitator and/or it whelp denominator. sent4: the toyshop hurts. sent5: there exists something such that that it is a screening and drugs is not right. sent6: the evangelist is not a kind of a rhododendron if the toyshop hurts and does not whelp distention. sent7: that the redpoll is not a grimace or it is cardiopulmonary or both does not hold. sent8: if there is something such that it does whelp distention and it does kidnap sereness the accretion does not whelp denominator. sent9: the fact that the applicator is a precipitator or it does whelp denominator or both is false if the toyshop does not hurt. sent10: if the fact that the redpoll is not a grimace and/or it is not non-cardiopulmonary is false then the evangelist does grimace. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toyshop does not whelp distention.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the toyshop does hurt but it does not whelp distention.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the evangelist is not a kind of a rhododendron.; sent2 -> int3: if the evangelist does grimace then it is a rhododendron.; sent10 & sent7 -> int4: the evangelist is a kind of a grimace.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the evangelist is a rhododendron is not wrong.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the toyshop does whelp distention.; sent5 & sent1 -> int8: the toyshop kidnaps sereness.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the toyshop does whelp distention and does kidnap sereness.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it does whelp distention and it does kidnap sereness.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the accretion does not whelp denominator.; int11 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__