that the grama does glamorize deliveryman and is a kind of a electrotherapy is not correct.
sent1: the taker surpasses. sent2: the goggle-eye does not surpass if something is both a walk and a murmur. sent3: the Miller copies lespedeza. sent4: either the Miller is a kind of a murmur or it is an alcazar or both. sent5: if the deliveryman is afloat or it does not copy Oaxaca or both it is neocortical. sent6: the fact that something does glamorize deliveryman and is a electrotherapy is not correct if it does not walk. sent7: that the grama is fungicidal is right. sent8: if there exists something such that it murmurs and/or it is a kind of an alcazar that the deliveryman murmurs is not incorrect. sent9: something walks if it is neocortical. sent10: if the goggle-eye does not surpass then that the invention is a kind of non-pronominal thing that does not surpass is not correct. sent11: if the fact that the invention is non-pronominal and it does not surpass is not true the grama does glamorize deliveryman. sent12: the deliveryman is afloat and/or does not copy Oaxaca. sent13: something is a electrotherapy if it is fungicidal. sent14: that the grama walks but it is not a electrotherapy is false. sent15: if the fact that the deliveryman is not a kind of a pronominal but it surpasses does not hold then it is not a murmur.
sent5 & sent12 -> int1: the deliveryman is neocortical.; sent9 -> int2: the deliveryman does walk if it is neocortical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the deliveryman does walk.; sent4 -> int4: something is either a murmur or an alcazar or both.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the deliveryman does murmur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the deliveryman walks and it does murmur.; int6 -> int7: something is a walk and it murmurs.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the goggle-eye does not surpass.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: that the invention is not a kind of a pronominal and it does not surpass is incorrect.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the grama does glamorize deliveryman.; sent13 -> int11: the grama is a kind of a electrotherapy if it is fungicidal.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the grama is a kind of a electrotherapy.; int10 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the grama glamorizes deliveryman and is a kind of a electrotherapy is incorrect.
sent6 -> int13: the fact that the grama does glamorize deliveryman and it is a electrotherapy is false if it is not a walk.;
$hypothesis$ = that the grama does glamorize deliveryman and is a kind of a electrotherapy is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the taker surpasses. sent2: the goggle-eye does not surpass if something is both a walk and a murmur. sent3: the Miller copies lespedeza. sent4: either the Miller is a kind of a murmur or it is an alcazar or both. sent5: if the deliveryman is afloat or it does not copy Oaxaca or both it is neocortical. sent6: the fact that something does glamorize deliveryman and is a electrotherapy is not correct if it does not walk. sent7: that the grama is fungicidal is right. sent8: if there exists something such that it murmurs and/or it is a kind of an alcazar that the deliveryman murmurs is not incorrect. sent9: something walks if it is neocortical. sent10: if the goggle-eye does not surpass then that the invention is a kind of non-pronominal thing that does not surpass is not correct. sent11: if the fact that the invention is non-pronominal and it does not surpass is not true the grama does glamorize deliveryman. sent12: the deliveryman is afloat and/or does not copy Oaxaca. sent13: something is a electrotherapy if it is fungicidal. sent14: that the grama walks but it is not a electrotherapy is false. sent15: if the fact that the deliveryman is not a kind of a pronominal but it surpasses does not hold then it is not a murmur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent12 -> int1: the deliveryman is neocortical.; sent9 -> int2: the deliveryman does walk if it is neocortical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the deliveryman does walk.; sent4 -> int4: something is either a murmur or an alcazar or both.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the deliveryman does murmur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the deliveryman walks and it does murmur.; int6 -> int7: something is a walk and it murmurs.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the goggle-eye does not surpass.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: that the invention is not a kind of a pronominal and it does not surpass is incorrect.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the grama does glamorize deliveryman.; sent13 -> int11: the grama is a kind of a electrotherapy if it is fungicidal.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the grama is a kind of a electrotherapy.; int10 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__