the hangover is neuropsychological.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not contribute siamang the metamorphism is a ichthyologist. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does contribute chlamydospore or it is a substitute or both is false. sent3: if that there exists something such that it does not contribute siamang is not wrong the metamorphism is both a RTLT and a ichthyologist. sent4: if the hangover is a kind of an anonymity then it is neuropsychological. sent5: the hangover is not a theocracy if the metamorphism is a RTLT and is a kind of a ichthyologist. sent6: if something does not contribute siamang then the fact that it is an anonymity and not a inconsequence does not hold. sent7: the platelayer is a kind of a inconsequence. sent8: something is non-neuropsychological if it is not a theocracy. sent9: if there exists something such that that it either does contribute chlamydospore or is a substitute or both is not true then the sewer is a kind of an anonymity. sent10: if the fact that either the platelayer is not a inconsequence or it is an anonymity or both is wrong the carpetbagger does not contribute siamang. sent11: something does contribute chlamydospore and/or is a kind of a substitute. sent12: that the platelayer is either not a inconsequence or an anonymity or both does not hold if the sewer is an anonymity.
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the sewer is an anonymity.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the platelayer either is not a inconsequence or is an anonymity or both is not correct.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the carpetbagger does not contribute siamang.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does not contribute siamang.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the metamorphism is a RTLT and a ichthyologist.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the hangover is not a theocracy.; sent8 -> int7: the hangover is not neuropsychological if it is not a theocracy.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the hangover is neuropsychological.
$hypothesis$ = the hangover is neuropsychological. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not contribute siamang the metamorphism is a ichthyologist. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does contribute chlamydospore or it is a substitute or both is false. sent3: if that there exists something such that it does not contribute siamang is not wrong the metamorphism is both a RTLT and a ichthyologist. sent4: if the hangover is a kind of an anonymity then it is neuropsychological. sent5: the hangover is not a theocracy if the metamorphism is a RTLT and is a kind of a ichthyologist. sent6: if something does not contribute siamang then the fact that it is an anonymity and not a inconsequence does not hold. sent7: the platelayer is a kind of a inconsequence. sent8: something is non-neuropsychological if it is not a theocracy. sent9: if there exists something such that that it either does contribute chlamydospore or is a substitute or both is not true then the sewer is a kind of an anonymity. sent10: if the fact that either the platelayer is not a inconsequence or it is an anonymity or both is wrong the carpetbagger does not contribute siamang. sent11: something does contribute chlamydospore and/or is a kind of a substitute. sent12: that the platelayer is either not a inconsequence or an anonymity or both does not hold if the sewer is an anonymity. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the sewer is an anonymity.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the platelayer either is not a inconsequence or is an anonymity or both is not correct.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the carpetbagger does not contribute siamang.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does not contribute siamang.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the metamorphism is a RTLT and a ichthyologist.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the hangover is not a theocracy.; sent8 -> int7: the hangover is not neuropsychological if it is not a theocracy.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__