there is something such that if it is a kind of a rent-roll it is not a estaminet and it is not tactful.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Embothrium it does not traffic windage and does not disoblige. sent2: if that the Curacao is a rent-roll hold then it is a kind of a estaminet and is not tactful. sent3: there is something such that if it is a rent-roll it is not tactful. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is arthrosporic is not false it does not know and it does not redirect probable. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is uncooperative hold it does not vitriol gherkin and it is not a Embothrium. sent6: if that the gherkin is fungicidal is right it is not vascular and is not a kind of a Atreus. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a rent-roll it is a estaminet and it is not tactful. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a rent-roll the fact that it is not a estaminet is not wrong. sent9: if the Curacao is a kind of a rent-roll it is not tactful. sent10: there is something such that if it is a rent-roll it is both not a estaminet and tactful. sent11: if the Curacao is a kind of a Handel then it is not a rent-roll and it is not amphibious.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of a rent-roll it is not a estaminet and it is not tactful. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Embothrium it does not traffic windage and does not disoblige. sent2: if that the Curacao is a rent-roll hold then it is a kind of a estaminet and is not tactful. sent3: there is something such that if it is a rent-roll it is not tactful. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is arthrosporic is not false it does not know and it does not redirect probable. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is uncooperative hold it does not vitriol gherkin and it is not a Embothrium. sent6: if that the gherkin is fungicidal is right it is not vascular and is not a kind of a Atreus. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a rent-roll it is a estaminet and it is not tactful. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a rent-roll the fact that it is not a estaminet is not wrong. sent9: if the Curacao is a kind of a rent-roll it is not tactful. sent10: there is something such that if it is a rent-roll it is both not a estaminet and tactful. sent11: if the Curacao is a kind of a Handel then it is not a rent-roll and it is not amphibious. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__