the fur is not hypovolemic and is penumbral.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not a man-of-war. sent2: if that something is a man-of-war and it is hierarchical is not wrong then the opsonin is not hypovolemic. sent3: the barroom is not a man-of-war. sent4: the basinet does not arouse if that the homo is not a fleabag is not false. sent5: if something is a man-of-war then the homo is not a fleabag. sent6: if the opsonin is not hypovolemic then the fur is not hypovolemic but it is penumbral. sent7: that the skybox does disunify piracy is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a man-of-war and hierarchical is not right. sent9: That the piracy does disunify skybox is not incorrect. sent10: the opsonin is non-hypovolemic if something is not a man-of-war and is hierarchical. sent11: the basinet arouses if the skybox does disunify piracy. sent12: the homo is not a fleabag if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a man-of-war and it is hierarchical is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the barroom is not a kind of a man-of-war and is hierarchical is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that that it is both not a man-of-war and hierarchical hold is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the homo is not a fleabag.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the basinet does not arouse.; sent11 & sent7 -> int4: the basinet arouses.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the barroom is not a man-of-war but hierarchical.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a man-of-war and it is hierarchical.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the opsonin is not hypovolemic.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fur is not hypovolemic and is penumbral. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a man-of-war. sent2: if that something is a man-of-war and it is hierarchical is not wrong then the opsonin is not hypovolemic. sent3: the barroom is not a man-of-war. sent4: the basinet does not arouse if that the homo is not a fleabag is not false. sent5: if something is a man-of-war then the homo is not a fleabag. sent6: if the opsonin is not hypovolemic then the fur is not hypovolemic but it is penumbral. sent7: that the skybox does disunify piracy is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a man-of-war and hierarchical is not right. sent9: That the piracy does disunify skybox is not incorrect. sent10: the opsonin is non-hypovolemic if something is not a man-of-war and is hierarchical. sent11: the basinet arouses if the skybox does disunify piracy. sent12: the homo is not a fleabag if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a man-of-war and it is hierarchical is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the barroom is not a kind of a man-of-war and is hierarchical is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that that it is both not a man-of-war and hierarchical hold is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the homo is not a fleabag.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the basinet does not arouse.; sent11 & sent7 -> int4: the basinet arouses.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the barroom is not a man-of-war but hierarchical.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a man-of-war and it is hierarchical.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the opsonin is not hypovolemic.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__