the umbilical is not a purist.
sent1: that the queenfish is a vegetable or it is an eyes or both is right. sent2: something is both profound and an intriguing if it is not a vegetable. sent3: the fact that the Episcopalian does not devein Acapulco is right. sent4: the helminth is not a vegetable if the Episcopalian does not devein Acapulco but it is a vegetable. sent5: the blond is a purist and it is a kind of a usufructuary if the helminth is not a kind of a undecagon. sent6: the blond is invisible and it is a black if the helminth is not usufructuary. sent7: the helminth is an intriguing. sent8: if something is a undecagon it is not usufructuary. sent9: that the helminth is clear and does not devein centrism is false if it is a kind of an intriguing. sent10: something that does devein centrism is a undecagon. sent11: something is not unclear but it deveins centrism if it is a kind of an intriguing. sent12: if something is a cenobite and it watches viremia that it does not shoulder hold. sent13: if something is not invisible then it is a kind of a black that is a frame. sent14: if the queenfish eyes then the Episcopalian is a vegetable. sent15: if the queenfish is a vegetable the Episcopalian is a vegetable. sent16: that something is not a purist is not wrong if it is not conspicuous but a black.
sent16 -> int1: the umbilical is not a purist if it is invisible and it is black.;
the umbilical is black and it is a kind of a frame.
sent13 -> int2: the umbilical is a kind of a black that is a frame if it is not invisible.; sent9 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that that the helminth is not unclear and does not devein centrism does not hold hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the umbilical is not a purist. ; $context$ = sent1: that the queenfish is a vegetable or it is an eyes or both is right. sent2: something is both profound and an intriguing if it is not a vegetable. sent3: the fact that the Episcopalian does not devein Acapulco is right. sent4: the helminth is not a vegetable if the Episcopalian does not devein Acapulco but it is a vegetable. sent5: the blond is a purist and it is a kind of a usufructuary if the helminth is not a kind of a undecagon. sent6: the blond is invisible and it is a black if the helminth is not usufructuary. sent7: the helminth is an intriguing. sent8: if something is a undecagon it is not usufructuary. sent9: that the helminth is clear and does not devein centrism is false if it is a kind of an intriguing. sent10: something that does devein centrism is a undecagon. sent11: something is not unclear but it deveins centrism if it is a kind of an intriguing. sent12: if something is a cenobite and it watches viremia that it does not shoulder hold. sent13: if something is not invisible then it is a kind of a black that is a frame. sent14: if the queenfish eyes then the Episcopalian is a vegetable. sent15: if the queenfish is a vegetable the Episcopalian is a vegetable. sent16: that something is not a purist is not wrong if it is not conspicuous but a black. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the umbilical is not a purist if it is invisible and it is black.; __UNKNOWN__