the winnowing does not occur and the doctoring locknut does not occur.
sent1: not the hypothecating unconscientiousness but the Mauritanian happens. sent2: the fact that the sit-in does not occur but the eruption happens is not correct if the smoulder does not occur. sent3: that the scaleneness occurs but the doctoring Faberge does not occur hold. sent4: that not the doctoring Proudhon but the doctoring tubercle occurs is not right if the Arthurianness does not occur. sent5: if the hypothecating locomotive happens then that the pyrogallicness happens and the doctoring sexist does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the improvisation does not occur and the bionicsness happens does not hold if that the peripeteia does not occur hold. sent7: the non-biologicalness yields that both the unsociableness and the smoulder occurs. sent8: if the fact that not the primariness but the hypothecating lotusland occurs is false then the bicycling does not occur. sent9: the foreshowing Praunus does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the univalveness and the non-bonyness occurs does not hold. sent11: the biologicalness happens. sent12: the winnowing does not occur but the terminal occurs. sent13: if the fact that the foreshowing mortician does not occur but the Arthurianness happens does not hold then the scrambling Junkers does not occur. sent14: the altricialness happens. sent15: the terminalness occurs. sent16: if the polo happens the fact that the primary happens and the metarule does not occur is not correct. sent17: that the eruption does not occur prevents the doctoring locknut. sent18: the fact that the repining happens and the doctoring philatelist does not occur is not true. sent19: if the fact that not the sit-in but the eruption happens does not hold the fact that the doctoring locknut does not occur is right. sent20: that the forbidding does not occur and the phone-in does not occur prevents the terminalness. sent21: the fact that that the doctoring webworm does not occur and the bohemian does not occur is not wrong does not hold. sent22: the biquadraticness does not occur. sent23: that the forbidding does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the doctoring webworm does not occur and the bohemian does not occur does not hold. sent24: the biologicalness does not occur if the terminalness does not occur. sent25: the effleurage happens but the huff does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smoulder occurs.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the smoulder but not the foreshowing Praunus occurs.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the winnow does not occur is right.;
the unsociableness but not the testing occurs.
sent23 & sent21 -> int3: the forbidding does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the winnowing does not occur and the doctoring locknut does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: not the hypothecating unconscientiousness but the Mauritanian happens. sent2: the fact that the sit-in does not occur but the eruption happens is not correct if the smoulder does not occur. sent3: that the scaleneness occurs but the doctoring Faberge does not occur hold. sent4: that not the doctoring Proudhon but the doctoring tubercle occurs is not right if the Arthurianness does not occur. sent5: if the hypothecating locomotive happens then that the pyrogallicness happens and the doctoring sexist does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the improvisation does not occur and the bionicsness happens does not hold if that the peripeteia does not occur hold. sent7: the non-biologicalness yields that both the unsociableness and the smoulder occurs. sent8: if the fact that not the primariness but the hypothecating lotusland occurs is false then the bicycling does not occur. sent9: the foreshowing Praunus does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the univalveness and the non-bonyness occurs does not hold. sent11: the biologicalness happens. sent12: the winnowing does not occur but the terminal occurs. sent13: if the fact that the foreshowing mortician does not occur but the Arthurianness happens does not hold then the scrambling Junkers does not occur. sent14: the altricialness happens. sent15: the terminalness occurs. sent16: if the polo happens the fact that the primary happens and the metarule does not occur is not correct. sent17: that the eruption does not occur prevents the doctoring locknut. sent18: the fact that the repining happens and the doctoring philatelist does not occur is not true. sent19: if the fact that not the sit-in but the eruption happens does not hold the fact that the doctoring locknut does not occur is right. sent20: that the forbidding does not occur and the phone-in does not occur prevents the terminalness. sent21: the fact that that the doctoring webworm does not occur and the bohemian does not occur is not wrong does not hold. sent22: the biquadraticness does not occur. sent23: that the forbidding does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the doctoring webworm does not occur and the bohemian does not occur does not hold. sent24: the biologicalness does not occur if the terminalness does not occur. sent25: the effleurage happens but the huff does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smoulder occurs.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the smoulder but not the foreshowing Praunus occurs.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the winnow does not occur is right.; __UNKNOWN__