the supplement is a masking.
sent1: that the fill is not autarchic is not wrong if something that does not unspell Xerophyllum is not a Princeton. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a collodion and physicochemical does not hold then the iproclozide is not physicochemical. sent3: that the iproclozide is judicial and is not algal is not right if the oarfish is algal. sent4: if there are non-physicochemical things that the oarfish is maxillomandibular and it is not non-afebrile is not correct. sent5: the fill is both autarchic and a dashboard. sent6: if that the fact that the oarfish is maxillomandibular and it is afebrile is true is wrong then the fill is not maxillomandibular. sent7: the fact that the tripper unspells Xerophyllum but it is not a Princeton is not true. sent8: the fill is a kind of a dashboard. sent9: if that the iproclozide is judicial but it is not algal is not right then the supplement does mask. sent10: that something is not a collodion but physicochemical does not hold if it is microcephalic. sent11: the fact that there is something such that it does not unspell Xerophyllum and it is a kind of a Princeton is not wrong. sent12: if something does unspell Xerophyllum that that it does not despair cartage hold does not hold. sent13: everything is microcephalic. sent14: the tripper does not unspell Xerophyllum. sent15: if the tripper does despair cartage the oarfish is algal. sent16: the supplement is a kind of a masking if the iproclozide is not judicial. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Princeton is not false. sent18: the fact that the iproclozide is both judicial and not a masking is wrong if it is a kind of a dashboard. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is not judicial and it is a kind of a dashboard is wrong the fact that the supplement is algal hold. sent20: there is something such that it does not unspell Xerophyllum. sent21: the fact that something is not judicial and is a dashboard is wrong if it is not maxillomandibular. sent22: if something does despair cartage but it is not autarchic it is not a masking.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tripper does not unspell Xerophyllum and it is not a kind of a Princeton.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it does not unspell Xerophyllum and is not a Princeton.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fill is not autarchic.; sent5 -> int3: the fill is autarchic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the fact that the tripper does not unspell Xerophyllum and is not a kind of a Princeton does not hold hold.;
the supplement does unspell Xerophyllum.
$hypothesis$ = the supplement is a masking. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fill is not autarchic is not wrong if something that does not unspell Xerophyllum is not a Princeton. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a collodion and physicochemical does not hold then the iproclozide is not physicochemical. sent3: that the iproclozide is judicial and is not algal is not right if the oarfish is algal. sent4: if there are non-physicochemical things that the oarfish is maxillomandibular and it is not non-afebrile is not correct. sent5: the fill is both autarchic and a dashboard. sent6: if that the fact that the oarfish is maxillomandibular and it is afebrile is true is wrong then the fill is not maxillomandibular. sent7: the fact that the tripper unspells Xerophyllum but it is not a Princeton is not true. sent8: the fill is a kind of a dashboard. sent9: if that the iproclozide is judicial but it is not algal is not right then the supplement does mask. sent10: that something is not a collodion but physicochemical does not hold if it is microcephalic. sent11: the fact that there is something such that it does not unspell Xerophyllum and it is a kind of a Princeton is not wrong. sent12: if something does unspell Xerophyllum that that it does not despair cartage hold does not hold. sent13: everything is microcephalic. sent14: the tripper does not unspell Xerophyllum. sent15: if the tripper does despair cartage the oarfish is algal. sent16: the supplement is a kind of a masking if the iproclozide is not judicial. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Princeton is not false. sent18: the fact that the iproclozide is both judicial and not a masking is wrong if it is a kind of a dashboard. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is not judicial and it is a kind of a dashboard is wrong the fact that the supplement is algal hold. sent20: there is something such that it does not unspell Xerophyllum. sent21: the fact that something is not judicial and is a dashboard is wrong if it is not maxillomandibular. sent22: if something does despair cartage but it is not autarchic it is not a masking. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tripper does not unspell Xerophyllum and it is not a kind of a Princeton.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it does not unspell Xerophyllum and is not a Princeton.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fill is not autarchic.; sent5 -> int3: the fill is autarchic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the fact that the tripper does not unspell Xerophyllum and is not a kind of a Princeton does not hold hold.; __UNKNOWN__