the bacteroidalness does not occur.
sent1: that the tripping lark happens is prevented by that the committing occurs and the tripping twenty-seven occurs. sent2: not the refunding but the Frenchifying Jonathan occurs if the fact that the hearing Aconitum happens is right. sent3: the econometricsness occurs. sent4: the bacteroidalness does not occur if that both the hearing Aconitum and the bacteroidalness happens is not right. sent5: if the fact that the Frenchifying Jonathan does not occur hold then that that the hearing Aconitum and the bacteroidalness happens is not false is wrong. sent6: the econometricsness yields that the brouhaha does not occur and the foolishness does not occur. sent7: the committing occurs if not the refunding but the Frenchifying Jonathan occurs. sent8: that the brouhaha does not occur and the foolishness does not occur is incorrect if the hearing Aconitum does not occur. sent9: the bacteroidalness happens if the tripping lark does not occur. sent10: the hearing conclave does not occur if that the hearing Aconitum does not occur and the Frenchifying Jonathan does not occur is not right. sent11: the tripping twenty-seven and the exempting happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hearing Aconitum does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the brouhaha does not occur and the foolishness does not occur is false.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the brouhaha does not occur and the foolishness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hearing Aconitum occurs hold.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: not the refunding but the Frenchifying Jonathan happens.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the committing happens.; sent11 -> int7: the tripping twenty-seven happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: both the committing and the tripping twenty-seven occurs.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the tripping lark does not occur.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the bacteroidalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the bacteroidalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tripping lark happens is prevented by that the committing occurs and the tripping twenty-seven occurs. sent2: not the refunding but the Frenchifying Jonathan occurs if the fact that the hearing Aconitum happens is right. sent3: the econometricsness occurs. sent4: the bacteroidalness does not occur if that both the hearing Aconitum and the bacteroidalness happens is not right. sent5: if the fact that the Frenchifying Jonathan does not occur hold then that that the hearing Aconitum and the bacteroidalness happens is not false is wrong. sent6: the econometricsness yields that the brouhaha does not occur and the foolishness does not occur. sent7: the committing occurs if not the refunding but the Frenchifying Jonathan occurs. sent8: that the brouhaha does not occur and the foolishness does not occur is incorrect if the hearing Aconitum does not occur. sent9: the bacteroidalness happens if the tripping lark does not occur. sent10: the hearing conclave does not occur if that the hearing Aconitum does not occur and the Frenchifying Jonathan does not occur is not right. sent11: the tripping twenty-seven and the exempting happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hearing Aconitum does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the brouhaha does not occur and the foolishness does not occur is false.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the brouhaha does not occur and the foolishness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hearing Aconitum occurs hold.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: not the refunding but the Frenchifying Jonathan happens.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the committing happens.; sent11 -> int7: the tripping twenty-seven happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: both the committing and the tripping twenty-seven occurs.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the tripping lark does not occur.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__