the daydreamer is not a coroner.
sent1: if the fact that the barrier is not ascomycetous is not wrong then the daydreamer does snuffle bamboo and it is a kind of a coroner. sent2: the damson does not tool sovereign if it is a Gabor and it does snuffle Stieglitz. sent3: if something is limbless then the fact that it is ascomycetous is correct. sent4: if a circular thing simulates then the daydreamer does snuffle bamboo. sent5: the daydreamer snuffles pinon. sent6: if the daydreamer is not pelvic then the fact that it is a kind of a coroner and it is ascomycetous is not true. sent7: the fact that the daydreamer is not pelvic but it is diplomatic is wrong. sent8: something that is pelvic is limbless. sent9: the fact that the daydreamer snuffles bamboo hold if there is something such that it is circular and does not simulate. sent10: if that the daydreamer is a kind of a coroner and it snuffles bamboo hold it is not ascomycetous. sent11: something is a circular but it does not simulate. sent12: the daydreamer is valent if that it is not valent and is limbless is incorrect. sent13: the daydreamer is not non-pelvic if the fact that it is not non-pelvic but diplomatic is incorrect.
sent11 & sent9 -> int1: the daydreamer does snuffle bamboo.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the daydreamer is a coroner.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the daydreamer is a coroner and snuffles bamboo.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the daydreamer is not ascomycetous.; sent3 -> int4: if the daydreamer is limbless then the fact that it is ascomycetous is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int5: the daydreamer is limbless if it is pelvic.; sent13 & sent7 -> int6: the daydreamer is not non-pelvic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the daydreamer is limbless.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the daydreamer is ascomycetous.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the bearnaise is not limbless.
$hypothesis$ = the daydreamer is not a coroner. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the barrier is not ascomycetous is not wrong then the daydreamer does snuffle bamboo and it is a kind of a coroner. sent2: the damson does not tool sovereign if it is a Gabor and it does snuffle Stieglitz. sent3: if something is limbless then the fact that it is ascomycetous is correct. sent4: if a circular thing simulates then the daydreamer does snuffle bamboo. sent5: the daydreamer snuffles pinon. sent6: if the daydreamer is not pelvic then the fact that it is a kind of a coroner and it is ascomycetous is not true. sent7: the fact that the daydreamer is not pelvic but it is diplomatic is wrong. sent8: something that is pelvic is limbless. sent9: the fact that the daydreamer snuffles bamboo hold if there is something such that it is circular and does not simulate. sent10: if that the daydreamer is a kind of a coroner and it snuffles bamboo hold it is not ascomycetous. sent11: something is a circular but it does not simulate. sent12: the daydreamer is valent if that it is not valent and is limbless is incorrect. sent13: the daydreamer is not non-pelvic if the fact that it is not non-pelvic but diplomatic is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent9 -> int1: the daydreamer does snuffle bamboo.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the daydreamer is a coroner.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the daydreamer is a coroner and snuffles bamboo.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the daydreamer is not ascomycetous.; sent3 -> int4: if the daydreamer is limbless then the fact that it is ascomycetous is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int5: the daydreamer is limbless if it is pelvic.; sent13 & sent7 -> int6: the daydreamer is not non-pelvic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the daydreamer is limbless.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the daydreamer is ascomycetous.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__