if the triazine is not poetics the circlet is a kind of a coyness.
sent1: the triazine is not a kind of an agoraphobia. sent2: the triazine does not complect toluene. sent3: the triazine gloms Hyalophora. sent4: if the fact that the toluene does not complect toluene and is not poetics is not correct the guan is not a kind of a coyness. sent5: the stoma is a coyness but it does not defoliate tungstate. sent6: the fact that the toluene does glom Hyalophora and it conflicts is not correct. sent7: if the toluene is not poetics the triazine does glom Hyalophora. sent8: the circlet is poetics if the triazine does not complect toluene. sent9: the fact that the circlet is a conflict but it is not a coyness is not correct. sent10: the fact that that the circlet is not a coyness hold is wrong if the triazine is poetics. sent11: the fact that the fact that the circlet does complect toluene but it is not poetics hold does not hold. sent12: something is a coyness if it does not complect toluene. sent13: the toluene is not a conflict. sent14: that if the circlet does not complect toluene then the circlet is poetics hold. sent15: if the toluene does glom Hyalophora and is a kind of a conflict the circlet does not complect toluene. sent16: if something is not an interceptor it does defoliate legalism. sent17: the circlet does not complect toluene if the toluene gloms Hyalophora and does not conflict. sent18: the triazine is poetics if the toluene does conflict. sent19: the fact that the toluene is poetics is not incorrect. sent20: if that that the toluene gloms Hyalophora and is not a conflict hold does not hold the triazine is poetics. sent21: the circlet defoliates Red and does not glom Hyalophora.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the toluene does glom Hyalophora and is not a kind of a conflict is false.; sent20 & assump2 -> int1: the triazine is poetics.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the triazine is not poetics.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the toluene gloms Hyalophora but it is not a conflict.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the circlet does not complect toluene.; sent12 -> int5: the fact that the circlet is a coyness is correct if it does not complect toluene.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the circlet is a coyness.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the guan is not a coyness.
$hypothesis$ = if the triazine is not poetics the circlet is a kind of a coyness. ; $context$ = sent1: the triazine is not a kind of an agoraphobia. sent2: the triazine does not complect toluene. sent3: the triazine gloms Hyalophora. sent4: if the fact that the toluene does not complect toluene and is not poetics is not correct the guan is not a kind of a coyness. sent5: the stoma is a coyness but it does not defoliate tungstate. sent6: the fact that the toluene does glom Hyalophora and it conflicts is not correct. sent7: if the toluene is not poetics the triazine does glom Hyalophora. sent8: the circlet is poetics if the triazine does not complect toluene. sent9: the fact that the circlet is a conflict but it is not a coyness is not correct. sent10: the fact that that the circlet is not a coyness hold is wrong if the triazine is poetics. sent11: the fact that the fact that the circlet does complect toluene but it is not poetics hold does not hold. sent12: something is a coyness if it does not complect toluene. sent13: the toluene is not a conflict. sent14: that if the circlet does not complect toluene then the circlet is poetics hold. sent15: if the toluene does glom Hyalophora and is a kind of a conflict the circlet does not complect toluene. sent16: if something is not an interceptor it does defoliate legalism. sent17: the circlet does not complect toluene if the toluene gloms Hyalophora and does not conflict. sent18: the triazine is poetics if the toluene does conflict. sent19: the fact that the toluene is poetics is not incorrect. sent20: if that that the toluene gloms Hyalophora and is not a conflict hold does not hold the triazine is poetics. sent21: the circlet defoliates Red and does not glom Hyalophora. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the toluene does glom Hyalophora and is not a kind of a conflict is false.; sent20 & assump2 -> int1: the triazine is poetics.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the triazine is not poetics.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the toluene gloms Hyalophora but it is not a conflict.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the circlet does not complect toluene.; sent12 -> int5: the fact that the circlet is a coyness is correct if it does not complect toluene.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the circlet is a coyness.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__