the toucan does form.
sent1: if the spline does tide it reopens drab. sent2: a non-involuntary thing is not a swelling and is not non-pugilistic. sent3: if something does not reopen drab it is a kind of an earldom that is a form. sent4: if the fact that the batting is a kind of a Senegalese is true the fact that either it does not sod or it is a fluoridation or both is not right. sent5: if something is backward it is adynamic. sent6: if the spline is a kind of a form and it is adynamic then the toucan is not a kind of a form. sent7: that if the halberd is a kind of a tide or it is not predictable or both then the spline is backward is right. sent8: the quiver is not involuntary if something that does not expense Brahman is an airport. sent9: if the fact that the batting is not a sod or is a fluoridation or both is incorrect then that the halberd is not predictable is not incorrect. sent10: if the toucan is predictable but it does not tide it forms. sent11: if the fact that the spline does collide but it is not a kind of a Washingtonian is not right it is not adynamic. sent12: the halberd does not reopen drab if the spline collides and is not Washingtonian. sent13: the toucan is predictable and is not a kind of a tide if there exists something such that it does not reopen drab. sent14: if the toucan is a kind of Washingtonian thing that is not adynamic the spline is not a tide. sent15: the toucan is predictable. sent16: the diethylstilbestrol does not expense Brahman and is an airport. sent17: the fact that the spline is not an earldom and it is not backward is not true. sent18: if that the spline is not adynamic hold it is not an earldom and it is not backward. sent19: if the spline is a kind of an earldom then that it is not adynamic and it is backward does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the spline collides and is not a Washingtonian is incorrect.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the spline is not adynamic.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the spline is not a kind of an earldom and it is non-backward.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the spline does collide and is not a Washingtonian.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the halberd does not reopen drab.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not reopen drab.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the toucan is predictable but it is not a kind of a tide.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the buffalofish is not a kind of a chlorophyte.
$hypothesis$ = the toucan does form. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spline does tide it reopens drab. sent2: a non-involuntary thing is not a swelling and is not non-pugilistic. sent3: if something does not reopen drab it is a kind of an earldom that is a form. sent4: if the fact that the batting is a kind of a Senegalese is true the fact that either it does not sod or it is a fluoridation or both is not right. sent5: if something is backward it is adynamic. sent6: if the spline is a kind of a form and it is adynamic then the toucan is not a kind of a form. sent7: that if the halberd is a kind of a tide or it is not predictable or both then the spline is backward is right. sent8: the quiver is not involuntary if something that does not expense Brahman is an airport. sent9: if the fact that the batting is not a sod or is a fluoridation or both is incorrect then that the halberd is not predictable is not incorrect. sent10: if the toucan is predictable but it does not tide it forms. sent11: if the fact that the spline does collide but it is not a kind of a Washingtonian is not right it is not adynamic. sent12: the halberd does not reopen drab if the spline collides and is not Washingtonian. sent13: the toucan is predictable and is not a kind of a tide if there exists something such that it does not reopen drab. sent14: if the toucan is a kind of Washingtonian thing that is not adynamic the spline is not a tide. sent15: the toucan is predictable. sent16: the diethylstilbestrol does not expense Brahman and is an airport. sent17: the fact that the spline is not an earldom and it is not backward is not true. sent18: if that the spline is not adynamic hold it is not an earldom and it is not backward. sent19: if the spline is a kind of an earldom then that it is not adynamic and it is backward does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the spline collides and is not a Washingtonian is incorrect.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the spline is not adynamic.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the spline is not a kind of an earldom and it is non-backward.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the spline does collide and is not a Washingtonian.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the halberd does not reopen drab.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not reopen drab.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the toucan is predictable but it is not a kind of a tide.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__