the weapon is not a kind of a Ephemeridae.
sent1: that the periodical is not bacteremic or it is not a NLP or both does not hold if the litter is a scoutmaster. sent2: there is something such that it is not a kind of a bop. sent3: the quad is both unemployable and a scoutmaster. sent4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a shaitan. sent5: the fact that the weapon is a NLP is true if something is not a kind of a Ephemeridae. sent6: the call-board is a kind of a Ephemeridae and it is bacteremic if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a NLP. sent7: the call-board is not a kind of a NLP. sent8: the call-board is both bacteremic and a scoutmaster if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a NLP. sent9: a scoutmaster is a Ephemeridae. sent10: there is something such that it is bacteremic. sent11: a non-bacteremic thing is a scoutmaster that is a NLP. sent12: if something is a Ephemeridae it is bacteremic. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not a NLP then the weapon is bacteremic and it is a kind of a scoutmaster. sent14: the weapon is not a sucker. sent15: the fact that the weapon is a scoutmaster is not false if there is something such that it is not bacteremic. sent16: the weapon is bacteremic. sent17: the call-board striates. sent18: something is branchless and it is a scoutmaster if it does not spectate pasture. sent19: the weapon is a kind of a Ephemeridae that is a kind of a scoutmaster if there exists something such that it is not bacteremic.
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a NLP.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the weapon is a kind of bacteremic thing that is a scoutmaster is correct.; int2 -> int3: the weapon is a scoutmaster.; sent9 -> int4: the weapon is a Ephemeridae if it is a kind of a scoutmaster.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the pasture is a kind of a NLP.
sent11 -> int5: if the pasture is not bacteremic then it is a kind of a scoutmaster that is a NLP.;
$hypothesis$ = the weapon is not a kind of a Ephemeridae. ; $context$ = sent1: that the periodical is not bacteremic or it is not a NLP or both does not hold if the litter is a scoutmaster. sent2: there is something such that it is not a kind of a bop. sent3: the quad is both unemployable and a scoutmaster. sent4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a shaitan. sent5: the fact that the weapon is a NLP is true if something is not a kind of a Ephemeridae. sent6: the call-board is a kind of a Ephemeridae and it is bacteremic if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a NLP. sent7: the call-board is not a kind of a NLP. sent8: the call-board is both bacteremic and a scoutmaster if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a NLP. sent9: a scoutmaster is a Ephemeridae. sent10: there is something such that it is bacteremic. sent11: a non-bacteremic thing is a scoutmaster that is a NLP. sent12: if something is a Ephemeridae it is bacteremic. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not a NLP then the weapon is bacteremic and it is a kind of a scoutmaster. sent14: the weapon is not a sucker. sent15: the fact that the weapon is a scoutmaster is not false if there is something such that it is not bacteremic. sent16: the weapon is bacteremic. sent17: the call-board striates. sent18: something is branchless and it is a scoutmaster if it does not spectate pasture. sent19: the weapon is a kind of a Ephemeridae that is a kind of a scoutmaster if there exists something such that it is not bacteremic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a NLP.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the weapon is a kind of bacteremic thing that is a scoutmaster is correct.; int2 -> int3: the weapon is a scoutmaster.; sent9 -> int4: the weapon is a Ephemeridae if it is a kind of a scoutmaster.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__