the serval does not overstrain sylvanite.
sent1: if the sylvanite does vanish but it is not an ideal then the serval is not an ideal. sent2: the lochia recumbs. sent3: if that something is a kind of an ideal and it hands mephobarbital is not true it does not hands mephobarbital. sent4: if that the serval is a kind of non-heliacal thing that disabuses crab is incorrect then it does full. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a kind of full thing that does overstrain sylvanite the sylvanite does hand mephobarbital. sent6: the serval is katharobic thing that is infectious. sent7: the baseball is an ideal. sent8: if something is not an ideal the fact that that the sylvanite is a kind of an ideal and it hands mephobarbital is not true hold. sent9: the fact that something fulls but it does not overstrain sylvanite is not right if it does hand mephobarbital. sent10: something that does not hand mephobarbital and is not full does not overstrain sylvanite. sent11: the muffler does hand mephobarbital and manifests lochia. sent12: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of an ideal hold. sent13: there exists something such that it disabuses crab. sent14: the sylvanite does not full. sent15: the fact that if the serval is heliacal the serval does full is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the serval is not heliacal but it disabuses crab does not hold. sent17: if the mesocarp is a kind of a Trinidadian the sylvanite does vanish and is non-ideal. sent18: the fact that the serval does disabuse crab and fulls does not hold if there exists something such that it does not disabuse crab.
sent4 & sent16 -> int1: the serval fulls.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the serval overstrains sylvanite.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the serval does full and it overstrains sylvanite.; int2 -> int3: something fulls and it overstrains sylvanite.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the sylvanite hands mephobarbital.; sent3 -> int5: if that the sylvanite is a kind of an ideal and it hands mephobarbital is not true then it does not hands mephobarbital.; sent12 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the sylvanite is an ideal that hands mephobarbital is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sylvanite does not hand mephobarbital.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the sabra is not full.
sent9 -> int9: the fact that the serval does full but it does not overstrain sylvanite is incorrect if it does hand mephobarbital.;
$hypothesis$ = the serval does not overstrain sylvanite. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sylvanite does vanish but it is not an ideal then the serval is not an ideal. sent2: the lochia recumbs. sent3: if that something is a kind of an ideal and it hands mephobarbital is not true it does not hands mephobarbital. sent4: if that the serval is a kind of non-heliacal thing that disabuses crab is incorrect then it does full. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a kind of full thing that does overstrain sylvanite the sylvanite does hand mephobarbital. sent6: the serval is katharobic thing that is infectious. sent7: the baseball is an ideal. sent8: if something is not an ideal the fact that that the sylvanite is a kind of an ideal and it hands mephobarbital is not true hold. sent9: the fact that something fulls but it does not overstrain sylvanite is not right if it does hand mephobarbital. sent10: something that does not hand mephobarbital and is not full does not overstrain sylvanite. sent11: the muffler does hand mephobarbital and manifests lochia. sent12: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of an ideal hold. sent13: there exists something such that it disabuses crab. sent14: the sylvanite does not full. sent15: the fact that if the serval is heliacal the serval does full is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the serval is not heliacal but it disabuses crab does not hold. sent17: if the mesocarp is a kind of a Trinidadian the sylvanite does vanish and is non-ideal. sent18: the fact that the serval does disabuse crab and fulls does not hold if there exists something such that it does not disabuse crab. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent16 -> int1: the serval fulls.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the serval overstrains sylvanite.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the serval does full and it overstrains sylvanite.; int2 -> int3: something fulls and it overstrains sylvanite.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the sylvanite hands mephobarbital.; sent3 -> int5: if that the sylvanite is a kind of an ideal and it hands mephobarbital is not true then it does not hands mephobarbital.; sent12 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the sylvanite is an ideal that hands mephobarbital is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sylvanite does not hand mephobarbital.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__