that the snot is not a shallot is correct.
sent1: the snot does not flick discontinuity if it does not flick snot. sent2: the mound does not flick snot. sent3: there is something such that it is not a sitter. sent4: something does not flick discontinuity if it does not flick snot. sent5: something does not flick discontinuity if the fact that it is provocative and it does flick snot is false. sent6: if something does not flick discontinuity it is not a kind of a shallot. sent7: if something is not a sitter then the fact that the snot is provocative and it does flick snot is not right.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the snot is provocative and does flick snot does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if that the snot is provocative and it does flick snot is wrong then it does not flick discontinuity.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snot does not flick discontinuity.; sent6 -> int4: if the snot does not flick discontinuity then it is not a shallot.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the snot is not a shallot is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the snot does not flick discontinuity if it does not flick snot. sent2: the mound does not flick snot. sent3: there is something such that it is not a sitter. sent4: something does not flick discontinuity if it does not flick snot. sent5: something does not flick discontinuity if the fact that it is provocative and it does flick snot is false. sent6: if something does not flick discontinuity it is not a kind of a shallot. sent7: if something is not a sitter then the fact that the snot is provocative and it does flick snot is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the snot is provocative and does flick snot does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if that the snot is provocative and it does flick snot is wrong then it does not flick discontinuity.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snot does not flick discontinuity.; sent6 -> int4: if the snot does not flick discontinuity then it is not a shallot.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__