the comprehensiveness does not occur.
sent1: the pupillariness does not occur if the ascosporicness does not occur. sent2: if that the spending handspike does not occur hold the fatality does not occur and the dilution occurs. sent3: the fact that the herbalness and the rehabilitating kinswoman happens does not hold if that the infelicitousness does not occur is not false. sent4: the systematicness does not occur. sent5: the comprehensiveness happens if that the boosting occurs is not incorrect. sent6: if the spending peroneus does not occur the iconicness does not occur. sent7: if the group happens but the rehabilitating ouzo does not occur that the spending handspike does not occur is correct. sent8: if the papalness does not occur then the depersonalization does not occur. sent9: that the argument happens is prevented by that the drinking and the nutritionalness occurs. sent10: if the fact that both the proness and the aquiferousness happens is incorrect then the comprehensive does not occur. sent11: the noxiousness happens and the drinking occurs. sent12: if the laboring Spizella does not occur then the fact that the fact that the prizing and the herbal happens is wrong hold. sent13: the boosting and the laboring Ludian occurs if the fatality does not occur. sent14: the fact that the fact that both the pro and the aquiferousness occurs is not right is true if the boost does not occur. sent15: the boost does not occur. sent16: that the grouping but not the rehabilitating ouzo happens is brought about by the non-iconicness. sent17: the rehabilitating ouzo does not occur. sent18: if the fact that either the torturing does not occur or the argument does not occur or both is not wrong then the spending peroneus does not occur. sent19: the noncomprehensiveness is caused by the non-proness. sent20: the spending does not occur. sent21: the laboring Low does not occur. sent22: that the laboring demurrer and the circumduction happens is wrong.
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that both the pro and the aquiferousness occurs is not true.; sent10 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the comprehensive occurs is correct.
sent11 -> int2: the drinking occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the comprehensiveness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the pupillariness does not occur if the ascosporicness does not occur. sent2: if that the spending handspike does not occur hold the fatality does not occur and the dilution occurs. sent3: the fact that the herbalness and the rehabilitating kinswoman happens does not hold if that the infelicitousness does not occur is not false. sent4: the systematicness does not occur. sent5: the comprehensiveness happens if that the boosting occurs is not incorrect. sent6: if the spending peroneus does not occur the iconicness does not occur. sent7: if the group happens but the rehabilitating ouzo does not occur that the spending handspike does not occur is correct. sent8: if the papalness does not occur then the depersonalization does not occur. sent9: that the argument happens is prevented by that the drinking and the nutritionalness occurs. sent10: if the fact that both the proness and the aquiferousness happens is incorrect then the comprehensive does not occur. sent11: the noxiousness happens and the drinking occurs. sent12: if the laboring Spizella does not occur then the fact that the fact that the prizing and the herbal happens is wrong hold. sent13: the boosting and the laboring Ludian occurs if the fatality does not occur. sent14: the fact that the fact that both the pro and the aquiferousness occurs is not right is true if the boost does not occur. sent15: the boost does not occur. sent16: that the grouping but not the rehabilitating ouzo happens is brought about by the non-iconicness. sent17: the rehabilitating ouzo does not occur. sent18: if the fact that either the torturing does not occur or the argument does not occur or both is not wrong then the spending peroneus does not occur. sent19: the noncomprehensiveness is caused by the non-proness. sent20: the spending does not occur. sent21: the laboring Low does not occur. sent22: that the laboring demurrer and the circumduction happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that both the pro and the aquiferousness occurs is not true.; sent10 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__