the solemnizing minuteness does not occur.
sent1: the solemnizing minuteness and the teasing ambassadress happens if the concordance does not occur. sent2: the hazing semifinalist happens. sent3: if that the Uruguayan happens but the concordance does not occur is false the fact that the concordance happens is correct. sent4: the concordance does not occur if the approachableness and the solemnizing aviation happens. sent5: the hazing semifinalist but not the perjury happens if the discouraging does not occur. sent6: if the hazing semifinalist happens but the perjury does not occur the oleophobicness occurs. sent7: the approachableness occurs and the stupidity happens. sent8: the perjury occurs. sent9: if the hazing putrescence occurs then the discouraging does not occur and the Uruguayan does not occur. sent10: that the perjury occurs and the hazing semifinalist does not occur does not hold if the concordance occurs.
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: both the perjury and the hazing semifinalist occurs.;
both the teasing ambassadress and the oleophobicness occurs.
sent7 -> int2: the approachableness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the solemnizing minuteness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the solemnizing minuteness and the teasing ambassadress happens if the concordance does not occur. sent2: the hazing semifinalist happens. sent3: if that the Uruguayan happens but the concordance does not occur is false the fact that the concordance happens is correct. sent4: the concordance does not occur if the approachableness and the solemnizing aviation happens. sent5: the hazing semifinalist but not the perjury happens if the discouraging does not occur. sent6: if the hazing semifinalist happens but the perjury does not occur the oleophobicness occurs. sent7: the approachableness occurs and the stupidity happens. sent8: the perjury occurs. sent9: if the hazing putrescence occurs then the discouraging does not occur and the Uruguayan does not occur. sent10: that the perjury occurs and the hazing semifinalist does not occur does not hold if the concordance occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: both the perjury and the hazing semifinalist occurs.; __UNKNOWN__