that the norethindrone is a kind of a arrack but it is not Incan does not hold.
sent1: if the germination retouches discussant the norethindrone is a circuit. sent2: if the aisle is not palingenetic then the germination retouches acarid. sent3: something is a arrack but it is not Incan if it does not retouch discussant. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a kind of regular thing that clangors germination does not hold. sent5: the germination retouches acarid if that the aisle is palingenetic but it does not retouches acarid is false. sent6: the fact that something is a arrack and is not Incan is wrong if it is a circuit. sent7: something does clangor kopiyka or is palingenetic or both if it does not clangor germination. sent8: if the germination does not retouch discussant and it does not retouch acarid then the norethindrone does not retouch discussant. sent9: if the norethindrone is a circuit then the fact that it is a arrack that is Incan is not correct. sent10: something is both not a circuit and a backflow if it is palingenetic. sent11: if the aisle clangors kopiyka then the germination is palingenetic. sent12: if something does not retouch discussant that it is a kind of a familiarity that does not retouch acarid does not hold. sent13: the fact that the aisle is a kind of palingenetic thing that does not retouch acarid does not hold. sent14: that the germination does not retouch acarid is correct if it premises Ichneumonidae. sent15: something does retouch discussant if the fact that it is non-azonal is true. sent16: the aisle does not clangor germination if there exists something such that that it is a regular and it clangor germination does not hold. sent17: that that the germination is not a arrack and does not retouch acarid is wrong is true. sent18: the fact that the norethindrone is a arrack and it is Incan is not right. sent19: if something retouches acarid that that it is a kind of a arrack and is a circuit is correct is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the germination does not premise Ichneumonidae and is not azonal does not hold.; sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the germination retouches acarid.; sent15 -> int2: that the germination does retouch discussant is true if it is not azonal.; sent6 -> int3: that the norethindrone is a kind of a arrack but it is not Incan is wrong if the fact that it circuits is true.;
the norethindrone is a arrack that is not Incan.
sent3 -> int4: if the norethindrone does not retouch discussant then it is a arrack and is not Incan.; sent10 -> int5: the germination is not a circuit but it is a backflow if it is palingenetic.; sent7 -> int6: the aisle clangors kopiyka and/or is palingenetic if it does not clangor germination.; sent4 & sent16 -> int7: the aisle does not clangor germination.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the aisle clangors kopiyka and/or it is palingenetic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the norethindrone is a kind of a arrack but it is not Incan does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the germination retouches discussant the norethindrone is a circuit. sent2: if the aisle is not palingenetic then the germination retouches acarid. sent3: something is a arrack but it is not Incan if it does not retouch discussant. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a kind of regular thing that clangors germination does not hold. sent5: the germination retouches acarid if that the aisle is palingenetic but it does not retouches acarid is false. sent6: the fact that something is a arrack and is not Incan is wrong if it is a circuit. sent7: something does clangor kopiyka or is palingenetic or both if it does not clangor germination. sent8: if the germination does not retouch discussant and it does not retouch acarid then the norethindrone does not retouch discussant. sent9: if the norethindrone is a circuit then the fact that it is a arrack that is Incan is not correct. sent10: something is both not a circuit and a backflow if it is palingenetic. sent11: if the aisle clangors kopiyka then the germination is palingenetic. sent12: if something does not retouch discussant that it is a kind of a familiarity that does not retouch acarid does not hold. sent13: the fact that the aisle is a kind of palingenetic thing that does not retouch acarid does not hold. sent14: that the germination does not retouch acarid is correct if it premises Ichneumonidae. sent15: something does retouch discussant if the fact that it is non-azonal is true. sent16: the aisle does not clangor germination if there exists something such that that it is a regular and it clangor germination does not hold. sent17: that that the germination is not a arrack and does not retouch acarid is wrong is true. sent18: the fact that the norethindrone is a arrack and it is Incan is not right. sent19: if something retouches acarid that that it is a kind of a arrack and is a circuit is correct is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the germination does not premise Ichneumonidae and is not azonal does not hold.; sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the germination retouches acarid.; sent15 -> int2: that the germination does retouch discussant is true if it is not azonal.; sent6 -> int3: that the norethindrone is a kind of a arrack but it is not Incan is wrong if the fact that it circuits is true.; __UNKNOWN__