not the chaffiness but the advocacy happens.
sent1: the negligentness is brought about by the negligentness and/or that the decorating porker does not occur. sent2: the decorating armature occurs. sent3: if the mantle happens then the aortalness occurs. sent4: the fact that the aortalness but not the chemosurgery occurs is not right if the Sabineness does not occur. sent5: that the vexing Anzio happens prevents that the inhumaneness does not occur. sent6: if the negligentness occurs that the dislocation but not the result happens does not hold. sent7: the aortalness does not occur if that the aortalness but not the chemosurgery happens is not right. sent8: the negligentness occurs and/or the decorating porker does not occur. sent9: if that the decorating credence occurs and the careering does not occur is correct then the harmfulness does not occur. sent10: the fact that that both the non-chaffiness and the advocacy occurs is wrong is right if the fact that the harmfulness occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the decorating credence occurs and the careering does not occur. sent12: if that the dislocation happens but the result does not occur is not right then the fact that the advocacy happens hold. sent13: the Sabine does not occur.
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the harmfulness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chaffiness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the harmfulness but the chaffiness occurs.; sent4 & sent13 -> int3: that the aortalness but not the chemosurgery occurs is incorrect.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the aortalness does not occur.; sent1 & sent8 -> int5: the negligentness happens.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the dislocation but not the result occurs is not true.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the advocacy happens.;
the fact that both the non-chaffyness and the advocacy happens is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = not the chaffiness but the advocacy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the negligentness is brought about by the negligentness and/or that the decorating porker does not occur. sent2: the decorating armature occurs. sent3: if the mantle happens then the aortalness occurs. sent4: the fact that the aortalness but not the chemosurgery occurs is not right if the Sabineness does not occur. sent5: that the vexing Anzio happens prevents that the inhumaneness does not occur. sent6: if the negligentness occurs that the dislocation but not the result happens does not hold. sent7: the aortalness does not occur if that the aortalness but not the chemosurgery happens is not right. sent8: the negligentness occurs and/or the decorating porker does not occur. sent9: if that the decorating credence occurs and the careering does not occur is correct then the harmfulness does not occur. sent10: the fact that that both the non-chaffiness and the advocacy occurs is wrong is right if the fact that the harmfulness occurs is not incorrect. sent11: the decorating credence occurs and the careering does not occur. sent12: if that the dislocation happens but the result does not occur is not right then the fact that the advocacy happens hold. sent13: the Sabine does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the harmfulness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chaffiness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the harmfulness but the chaffiness occurs.; sent4 & sent13 -> int3: that the aortalness but not the chemosurgery occurs is incorrect.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the aortalness does not occur.; sent1 & sent8 -> int5: the negligentness happens.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the dislocation but not the result occurs is not true.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the advocacy happens.; __UNKNOWN__