the pentathlete is not incurious.
sent1: the pentathlete is idiographic if that the Kazak is not stoloniferous but it does contort heme does not hold. sent2: something is not non-acatalectic. sent3: if the pheasant does not contort screech it is not a equilibration and it is sad. sent4: the pheasant is not a equilibration if it does not contort screech. sent5: there is something such that it does not account. sent6: the fact that something does not account and does contort heme is not right if it is not stoloniferous. sent7: that the Kazak is stoloniferous and contorts heme does not hold. sent8: the pentathlete is incurious if the Kazak is an account. sent9: the pentathlete is non-blastospheric and is nonpasserine. sent10: if there exists something such that it is a acatalectic and it is incurious then the pheasant is not nonpasserine. sent11: if the pheasant is sad the fact that it is a kind of non-nonpasserine thing that does not contort riskiness does not hold. sent12: the pheasant is idiographic if that the Mayan is not nonpasserine and it is not idiographic is not true. sent13: the pheasant does not contort screech. sent14: there exists something such that it is incurious. sent15: the pentathlete is sad. sent16: the pentathlete is idiographic if the Kazak is stoloniferous. sent17: that if there is something such that it does not account the fact that the Kazak is a kind of stoloniferous thing that contorts heme is not right is not false. sent18: if something is nonpasserine then the fact that the Mayan is not nonpasserine and it is not idiographic does not hold. sent19: there is something such that it does account. sent20: The screech does not contort pheasant. sent21: the heme is both sad and acatalectic. sent22: if the pheasant is sad the fact that it is nonpasserine and it does not contort riskiness is false. sent23: the fact that the Kazak is a kind of non-stoloniferous thing that does contort heme is not correct if there is something such that it is not a kind of an account. sent24: that the pheasant is nonpasserine but it does not contort riskiness does not hold. sent25: the pheasant is not a equilibration. sent26: if something is sad and is a acatalectic then the affiliate is nonpasserine. sent27: the pentathlete is acatalectic if it is idiographic.
sent5 & sent23 -> int1: the fact that the Kazak is not stoloniferous but it does contort heme is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the pentathlete is idiographic.; int2 & sent27 -> int3: the pentathlete is a acatalectic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pentathlete is incurious hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the pentathlete is a acatalectic and is incurious.; int4 -> int5: that something is a acatalectic and not curious hold.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the pheasant is not nonpasserine.; sent3 & sent13 -> int7: the pheasant is not a equilibration but it is sad.; int7 -> int8: the pheasant is sad.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: that the pheasant is not nonpasserine and it does not contort riskiness is incorrect.;
the pentathlete is incurious.
sent6 -> int10: the fact that the Kazak does not account but it contorts heme is not right if it is non-stoloniferous.; sent21 -> int11: there exists something such that it is sad and a acatalectic.; int11 & sent26 -> int12: the affiliate is nonpasserine.; int12 -> int13: something is nonpasserine.; int13 & sent18 -> int14: that the Mayan is both not nonpasserine and not idiographic is wrong.; sent12 & int14 -> int15: the pheasant is idiographic.; int15 -> int16: something is idiographic.;
$hypothesis$ = the pentathlete is not incurious. ; $context$ = sent1: the pentathlete is idiographic if that the Kazak is not stoloniferous but it does contort heme does not hold. sent2: something is not non-acatalectic. sent3: if the pheasant does not contort screech it is not a equilibration and it is sad. sent4: the pheasant is not a equilibration if it does not contort screech. sent5: there is something such that it does not account. sent6: the fact that something does not account and does contort heme is not right if it is not stoloniferous. sent7: that the Kazak is stoloniferous and contorts heme does not hold. sent8: the pentathlete is incurious if the Kazak is an account. sent9: the pentathlete is non-blastospheric and is nonpasserine. sent10: if there exists something such that it is a acatalectic and it is incurious then the pheasant is not nonpasserine. sent11: if the pheasant is sad the fact that it is a kind of non-nonpasserine thing that does not contort riskiness does not hold. sent12: the pheasant is idiographic if that the Mayan is not nonpasserine and it is not idiographic is not true. sent13: the pheasant does not contort screech. sent14: there exists something such that it is incurious. sent15: the pentathlete is sad. sent16: the pentathlete is idiographic if the Kazak is stoloniferous. sent17: that if there is something such that it does not account the fact that the Kazak is a kind of stoloniferous thing that contorts heme is not right is not false. sent18: if something is nonpasserine then the fact that the Mayan is not nonpasserine and it is not idiographic does not hold. sent19: there is something such that it does account. sent20: The screech does not contort pheasant. sent21: the heme is both sad and acatalectic. sent22: if the pheasant is sad the fact that it is nonpasserine and it does not contort riskiness is false. sent23: the fact that the Kazak is a kind of non-stoloniferous thing that does contort heme is not correct if there is something such that it is not a kind of an account. sent24: that the pheasant is nonpasserine but it does not contort riskiness does not hold. sent25: the pheasant is not a equilibration. sent26: if something is sad and is a acatalectic then the affiliate is nonpasserine. sent27: the pentathlete is acatalectic if it is idiographic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent23 -> int1: the fact that the Kazak is not stoloniferous but it does contort heme is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the pentathlete is idiographic.; int2 & sent27 -> int3: the pentathlete is a acatalectic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pentathlete is incurious hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the pentathlete is a acatalectic and is incurious.; int4 -> int5: that something is a acatalectic and not curious hold.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the pheasant is not nonpasserine.; sent3 & sent13 -> int7: the pheasant is not a equilibration but it is sad.; int7 -> int8: the pheasant is sad.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: that the pheasant is not nonpasserine and it does not contort riskiness is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__