that the fact that the trophotropism is non-invariable thing that is a Kyrgyzstan does not hold is true.
sent1: if there is something such that that it browses fantasy and it is a Azerbaijan is wrong then the firedamp is not a buttinsky. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a majority is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the trophotropism is not invariable is correct if that the lisinopril is not invariable and/or is not a counterplot is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a majority then the fact that the mummification is not autobiographical and it is not emulous is wrong. sent5: the fact that that the lisinopril is not invariable and/or it is not a counterplot hold does not hold. sent6: the bronchus is a kind of a cape if there exists something such that that it is a rudiment and does disunify firedamp does not hold. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a rudiment and it does disunify firedamp does not hold then the fact that the firedamp is a kind of a cape is not incorrect. sent8: that the bronchus is a kind of a rudiment and it disunifies firedamp is false. sent9: the trophotropism is a Kyrgyzstan if the firedamp is a kind of a cape. sent10: if the fact that something does not configure lisinopril is not incorrect then that it browses fantasy and it is a Azerbaijan does not hold. sent11: if the fact that the trophotropism is not a Kyrgyzstan and/or does not disunify firedamp is false then the bronchus is not a Kyrgyzstan. sent12: the fact that something is a kind of variable a Kyrgyzstan is not right if the fact that it is a cape is not false. sent13: the firedamp is a kind of a Kyrgyzstan. sent14: if the fact that the mummification is not autobiographical and it is not emulous does not hold then the lisinopril does not configure lisinopril.
sent8 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a rudiment and disunifies firedamp is not right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the firedamp is a cape is not incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the trophotropism is a kind of a Kyrgyzstan.; sent3 & sent5 -> int4: the trophotropism is not invariable.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the trophotropism is not invariable but it is a Kyrgyzstan is false.
sent12 -> int5: that the trophotropism is not invariable but it is a Kyrgyzstan does not hold if it is a cape.; sent10 -> int6: that the lisinopril browses fantasy and it is a kind of a Azerbaijan is not correct if it does not configure lisinopril.; sent2 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the mummification is not autobiographical and it is not emulous is not correct.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the lisinopril does not configure lisinopril.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the lisinopril does browse fantasy and it is a Azerbaijan is not right.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it browses fantasy and it is a Azerbaijan does not hold.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the firedamp is not a buttinsky.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is not a buttinsky.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the trophotropism is non-invariable thing that is a Kyrgyzstan does not hold is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it browses fantasy and it is a Azerbaijan is wrong then the firedamp is not a buttinsky. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a majority is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the trophotropism is not invariable is correct if that the lisinopril is not invariable and/or is not a counterplot is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a majority then the fact that the mummification is not autobiographical and it is not emulous is wrong. sent5: the fact that that the lisinopril is not invariable and/or it is not a counterplot hold does not hold. sent6: the bronchus is a kind of a cape if there exists something such that that it is a rudiment and does disunify firedamp does not hold. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a rudiment and it does disunify firedamp does not hold then the fact that the firedamp is a kind of a cape is not incorrect. sent8: that the bronchus is a kind of a rudiment and it disunifies firedamp is false. sent9: the trophotropism is a Kyrgyzstan if the firedamp is a kind of a cape. sent10: if the fact that something does not configure lisinopril is not incorrect then that it browses fantasy and it is a Azerbaijan does not hold. sent11: if the fact that the trophotropism is not a Kyrgyzstan and/or does not disunify firedamp is false then the bronchus is not a Kyrgyzstan. sent12: the fact that something is a kind of variable a Kyrgyzstan is not right if the fact that it is a cape is not false. sent13: the firedamp is a kind of a Kyrgyzstan. sent14: if the fact that the mummification is not autobiographical and it is not emulous does not hold then the lisinopril does not configure lisinopril. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a rudiment and disunifies firedamp is not right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the firedamp is a cape is not incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the trophotropism is a kind of a Kyrgyzstan.; sent3 & sent5 -> int4: the trophotropism is not invariable.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__