if the porcupinefish is a giver then the lido does not generate and is not a kind of a solicitation.
sent1: something is a kind of a solicitation if it cuts. sent2: the porcupinefish is not a solicitation if the teasel is a manure. sent3: the teasel cuts if that the porcupinefish is not a manure but it is homologous is not right. sent4: if the teasel is a solicitation the lido does not generate and is not a solicitation. sent5: if the porcupinefish is a giver then the fact that it is not a manure but homologous is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the porcupinefish is a giver.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the porcupinefish is not a manure but it is homologous does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the teasel cuts.; sent1 -> int3: the teasel is a solicitation if it does cut.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the teasel is a solicitation.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the lido does not generate and is not a solicitation.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the porcupinefish is a giver then the lido does not generate and is not a kind of a solicitation. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a solicitation if it cuts. sent2: the porcupinefish is not a solicitation if the teasel is a manure. sent3: the teasel cuts if that the porcupinefish is not a manure but it is homologous is not right. sent4: if the teasel is a solicitation the lido does not generate and is not a solicitation. sent5: if the porcupinefish is a giver then the fact that it is not a manure but homologous is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the porcupinefish is a giver.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the porcupinefish is not a manure but it is homologous does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the teasel cuts.; sent1 -> int3: the teasel is a solicitation if it does cut.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the teasel is a solicitation.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the lido does not generate and is not a solicitation.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__