the fact that the elastance does glom zarf or is unconstitutional or both does not hold.
sent1: if the elastance is a latter and/or is not a kalumpang it is genial. sent2: the fact that either something gloms zarf or it is unconstitutional or both does not hold if it is not genial. sent3: if the elastance is genial then it is not constitutional. sent4: everything is a latter and/or it is not a kalumpang. sent5: the fact that the Edam is not unconstitutional but genial if the Edam does not glom zarf is not wrong. sent6: if something does not lamb culmination the fact that it does not defoliate methaqualone and it is a greenockite is false. sent7: everything is latter and/or it is a kalumpang. sent8: if the fact that something does not defoliate methaqualone and is a greenockite is not right then it does not glom zarf. sent9: the elastance is a latter or is a kalumpang or both. sent10: if something is not unconstitutional but it is genial it is not a kind of a kalumpang. sent11: if the choanocyte is not genial it does complect Hohenlinden.
sent4 -> int1: the elastance is latter or is not a kalumpang or both.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the elastance is genial.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the elastance is unconstitutional.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the Edam is endomorphic or not a kalumpang or both.
sent10 -> int4: the Edam is not a kalumpang if it is not unconstitutional and it is genial.; sent8 -> int5: the Edam does not glom zarf if the fact that it does not defoliate methaqualone and is a greenockite is false.; sent6 -> int6: if the Edam does not lamb culmination that it does not defoliate methaqualone and is a kind of a greenockite does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the elastance does glom zarf or is unconstitutional or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the elastance is a latter and/or is not a kalumpang it is genial. sent2: the fact that either something gloms zarf or it is unconstitutional or both does not hold if it is not genial. sent3: if the elastance is genial then it is not constitutional. sent4: everything is a latter and/or it is not a kalumpang. sent5: the fact that the Edam is not unconstitutional but genial if the Edam does not glom zarf is not wrong. sent6: if something does not lamb culmination the fact that it does not defoliate methaqualone and it is a greenockite is false. sent7: everything is latter and/or it is a kalumpang. sent8: if the fact that something does not defoliate methaqualone and is a greenockite is not right then it does not glom zarf. sent9: the elastance is a latter or is a kalumpang or both. sent10: if something is not unconstitutional but it is genial it is not a kind of a kalumpang. sent11: if the choanocyte is not genial it does complect Hohenlinden. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the elastance is latter or is not a kalumpang or both.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the elastance is genial.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the elastance is unconstitutional.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__