the shellflower is aboriginal.
sent1: something ammoniates tidemark but it is not an experiment if it is not a sketchbook. sent2: the shellflower is not aboriginal if there is something such that the fact that it is congestive and/or it is a palatinate is not right. sent3: there is nothing such that it is congestive or it is a palatinate or both. sent4: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a palatinate or it is aboriginal or both is not true then the hematocrit is not congestive. sent5: there is something such that it is non-congestive. sent6: if the myelencephalon is a Illampu then the metalware is not a Camden and is a telegraph. sent7: if something that does ammoniate tidemark is not an experiment the workbench is anisogamic. sent8: there is something such that that it clanks Oslo and/or it does crook Smalley is not true. sent9: if the metalware is not a Camden and is a telegraph then it does not clank scandalization. sent10: if the workbench is not aboriginal then the fact that the shellflower is systematic or is distributional or both is not correct. sent11: that the hematocrit is aboriginal or is congestive or both does not hold. sent12: there is something such that it is not aboriginal. sent13: the cachou is not congestive. sent14: that the hematocrit is not congestive is not incorrect. sent15: there is something such that that it is aboriginal and/or congestive is not correct. sent16: the myelencephalon is a Illampu. sent17: that that the firetrap is congestive and/or it is indissoluble is false is correct. sent18: everything is not congestive. sent19: something that is anisogamic is non-aboriginal thing that is incontinent. sent20: if the metalware does not clank scandalization it is not a sketchbook and is magisterial. sent21: something that is not anisogamic is aboriginal and incontinent.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the hematocrit either is congestive or is a palatinate or both is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is congestive and/or it is a palatinate is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the shellflower is aboriginal.
sent21 -> int3: if the shellflower is non-anisogamic it is a kind of aboriginal thing that is incontinent.;
$hypothesis$ = the shellflower is aboriginal. ; $context$ = sent1: something ammoniates tidemark but it is not an experiment if it is not a sketchbook. sent2: the shellflower is not aboriginal if there is something such that the fact that it is congestive and/or it is a palatinate is not right. sent3: there is nothing such that it is congestive or it is a palatinate or both. sent4: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a palatinate or it is aboriginal or both is not true then the hematocrit is not congestive. sent5: there is something such that it is non-congestive. sent6: if the myelencephalon is a Illampu then the metalware is not a Camden and is a telegraph. sent7: if something that does ammoniate tidemark is not an experiment the workbench is anisogamic. sent8: there is something such that that it clanks Oslo and/or it does crook Smalley is not true. sent9: if the metalware is not a Camden and is a telegraph then it does not clank scandalization. sent10: if the workbench is not aboriginal then the fact that the shellflower is systematic or is distributional or both is not correct. sent11: that the hematocrit is aboriginal or is congestive or both does not hold. sent12: there is something such that it is not aboriginal. sent13: the cachou is not congestive. sent14: that the hematocrit is not congestive is not incorrect. sent15: there is something such that that it is aboriginal and/or congestive is not correct. sent16: the myelencephalon is a Illampu. sent17: that that the firetrap is congestive and/or it is indissoluble is false is correct. sent18: everything is not congestive. sent19: something that is anisogamic is non-aboriginal thing that is incontinent. sent20: if the metalware does not clank scandalization it is not a sketchbook and is magisterial. sent21: something that is not anisogamic is aboriginal and incontinent. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the hematocrit either is congestive or is a palatinate or both is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is congestive and/or it is a palatinate is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__