the Turkicness but not the spastic occurs.
sent1: the violation occurs. sent2: if the docileness does not occur then that the adamantineness occurs and the dominance happens is wrong. sent3: the dominance causes the Montserratian. sent4: the fact that the fact that both the Turkicness and the non-spasticness occurs hold is not correct if the adamantineness does not occur. sent5: that the Turkicness occurs and the spastic occurs does not hold if the adamantineness does not occur. sent6: the docileness is prevented by that the cambering reimposition does not occur and the study does not occur. sent7: the cambering reimposition does not occur and the study does not occur if the unworldliness happens. sent8: the fact that the violation happens hold if the pneumaticsness does not occur. sent9: the pneumaticsness does not occur. sent10: the ropiness and the thoughtfulness happens. sent11: that the Turkicness and the spastic occurs is wrong. sent12: the fact that the flats does not occur is correct if the rolling gastrogavage does not occur and the uranoplasty does not occur. sent13: the fact that the fact that the nonpsychoactiveness but not the cambering vivacity happens is incorrect if the opening truncation does not occur hold. sent14: if that the ropiness occurs is correct that the homeopathy happens but the rearrangement does not occur is false. sent15: the unworldliness is brought about by that the flats does not occur and the trucking dysphoria occurs. sent16: the rearrangement occurs. sent17: the non-empiricness triggers that the pneumaticsness occurs but the violation does not occur. sent18: if that the adamantineness occurs and the dominance occurs is false the spasticness does not occur. sent19: the dominance happens if the adamantineness occurs. sent20: the non-Montserratianness and the violation occurs if that the pneumaticsness does not occur hold. sent21: that not the Turkicness but the Montserratianness happens is not right if the violation does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adamantineness occurs.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the dominance occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Montserratian occurs.; sent20 & sent9 -> int3: the Montserratian does not occur but the violation happens.; int3 -> int4: the Montserratian does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the adamantineness does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the Turkicness but not the spasticness occurs.
sent10 -> int7: the ropiness happens.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the homeopathy but not the rearrangement happens is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Turkicness but not the spastic occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the violation occurs. sent2: if the docileness does not occur then that the adamantineness occurs and the dominance happens is wrong. sent3: the dominance causes the Montserratian. sent4: the fact that the fact that both the Turkicness and the non-spasticness occurs hold is not correct if the adamantineness does not occur. sent5: that the Turkicness occurs and the spastic occurs does not hold if the adamantineness does not occur. sent6: the docileness is prevented by that the cambering reimposition does not occur and the study does not occur. sent7: the cambering reimposition does not occur and the study does not occur if the unworldliness happens. sent8: the fact that the violation happens hold if the pneumaticsness does not occur. sent9: the pneumaticsness does not occur. sent10: the ropiness and the thoughtfulness happens. sent11: that the Turkicness and the spastic occurs is wrong. sent12: the fact that the flats does not occur is correct if the rolling gastrogavage does not occur and the uranoplasty does not occur. sent13: the fact that the fact that the nonpsychoactiveness but not the cambering vivacity happens is incorrect if the opening truncation does not occur hold. sent14: if that the ropiness occurs is correct that the homeopathy happens but the rearrangement does not occur is false. sent15: the unworldliness is brought about by that the flats does not occur and the trucking dysphoria occurs. sent16: the rearrangement occurs. sent17: the non-empiricness triggers that the pneumaticsness occurs but the violation does not occur. sent18: if that the adamantineness occurs and the dominance occurs is false the spasticness does not occur. sent19: the dominance happens if the adamantineness occurs. sent20: the non-Montserratianness and the violation occurs if that the pneumaticsness does not occur hold. sent21: that not the Turkicness but the Montserratianness happens is not right if the violation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adamantineness occurs.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the dominance occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Montserratian occurs.; sent20 & sent9 -> int3: the Montserratian does not occur but the violation happens.; int3 -> int4: the Montserratian does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the adamantineness does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__