the attentiveness happens.
sent1: that both the non-prospectiveness and the reshuffle happens is false. sent2: the Hegira happens. sent3: that the pasteurization does not occur triggers that the masculineness and/or the pretentiousness occurs. sent4: that the tutelage does not occur and the ravage does not occur is not right if the bar happens. sent5: if the apheticness does not occur the non-Monophysiteness and/or the non-attentiveness happens. sent6: that the pasteurization does not occur is brought about by the ESM. sent7: the reversibleness is caused by that the apheticness occurs and the Monophysite occurs. sent8: that both the orgy and the imaging happens brings about that the tutelage does not occur. sent9: the traumaticness happens. sent10: if the Hegira happens and the nonreversibleness does not occur then the tailgating tipstaff happens. sent11: that the directness does not occur prevents that the diagnosticness occurs. sent12: the non-apheticness leads to that the foil occurs and the Monophysiteness happens. sent13: if the drilling pound does not occur then the fact that the barring happens is not false. sent14: the directness does not occur if that the tutelage does not occur and the ravage does not occur is not true. sent15: if the nonreversibleness happens then that the Hegira does not occur but the apheticness happens does not hold. sent16: the ESM happens and/or the supernaturalistness occurs. sent17: if the fact that the tailgating tipstaff and the directness happens is not true then the tailgating tipstaff does not occur. sent18: if that the prospectiveness does not occur and the reshuffle happens is incorrect then the apheticness happens. sent19: the attentiveness does not occur and the diagnosticness does not occur if the directing does not occur. sent20: the fact that the tailgating tipstaff occurs and the directing occurs is false.
sent18 & sent1 -> int1: the apheticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Monophysiteness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the apheticness and the Monophysiteness happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the nonreversibleness does not occur is not incorrect.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Hegira occurs and the nonreversibleness does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: that the tailgating tipstaff occurs is right.; sent17 & sent20 -> int6: the tailgating tipstaff does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Monophysite does not occur.;
the attentiveness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the attentiveness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the non-prospectiveness and the reshuffle happens is false. sent2: the Hegira happens. sent3: that the pasteurization does not occur triggers that the masculineness and/or the pretentiousness occurs. sent4: that the tutelage does not occur and the ravage does not occur is not right if the bar happens. sent5: if the apheticness does not occur the non-Monophysiteness and/or the non-attentiveness happens. sent6: that the pasteurization does not occur is brought about by the ESM. sent7: the reversibleness is caused by that the apheticness occurs and the Monophysite occurs. sent8: that both the orgy and the imaging happens brings about that the tutelage does not occur. sent9: the traumaticness happens. sent10: if the Hegira happens and the nonreversibleness does not occur then the tailgating tipstaff happens. sent11: that the directness does not occur prevents that the diagnosticness occurs. sent12: the non-apheticness leads to that the foil occurs and the Monophysiteness happens. sent13: if the drilling pound does not occur then the fact that the barring happens is not false. sent14: the directness does not occur if that the tutelage does not occur and the ravage does not occur is not true. sent15: if the nonreversibleness happens then that the Hegira does not occur but the apheticness happens does not hold. sent16: the ESM happens and/or the supernaturalistness occurs. sent17: if the fact that the tailgating tipstaff and the directness happens is not true then the tailgating tipstaff does not occur. sent18: if that the prospectiveness does not occur and the reshuffle happens is incorrect then the apheticness happens. sent19: the attentiveness does not occur and the diagnosticness does not occur if the directing does not occur. sent20: the fact that the tailgating tipstaff occurs and the directing occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent1 -> int1: the apheticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Monophysiteness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the apheticness and the Monophysiteness happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the nonreversibleness does not occur is not incorrect.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Hegira occurs and the nonreversibleness does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: that the tailgating tipstaff occurs is right.; sent17 & sent20 -> int6: the tailgating tipstaff does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Monophysite does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__