the evangelicalness does not occur.
sent1: the terminologicalness occurs. sent2: the emitting does not occur if both the wrestling and the terminologicalness happens. sent3: the editorialness does not occur. sent4: that the wrestle does not occur triggers the non-editorialness and/or the non-terminologicalness. sent5: the deactivating knacker does not occur if the fact that both the deactivating knacker and the defrosting happens is wrong. sent6: if the non-burrlikeness and the non-Eucharisticness occurs then the departure does not occur. sent7: the Eucharisticness does not occur if the fact that the editorialness does not occur hold. sent8: if the pericardialness but not the euphonicness happens the flounce happens. sent9: if the confederating asserter happens the peacefulness occurs and the denigration does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the anapesticness happens hold then both the pericardialness and the non-euphonicness occurs. sent11: the intergalacticness does not occur. sent12: the fact that that the auspice does not occur is caused by that the burrlikeness does not occur and the emitting does not occur is not wrong. sent13: both the non-burrlikeness and the non-Eucharisticness occurs if the emitting occurs. sent14: the wrestling happens. sent15: that both the deactivating knacker and the defrosting occurs does not hold if the fact that the passionateness does not occur hold. sent16: if the burrlikeness happens then the Eucharisticness occurs. sent17: if the deactivating whaleboat does not occur the cascading sporozoite does not occur. sent18: the confederating Gur does not occur. sent19: the evangelicalness does not occur if the auspice does not occur. sent20: the gravity-assist does not occur if the fact that the peacefulness happens is not wrong. sent21: if that the deactivating knacker occurs is wrong the cascading backbone occurs and the wrestle does not occur. sent22: that the flounce happens triggers that the passionateness does not occur but the oviparousness happens. sent23: if the terminologicalness does not occur then the evangelicalness occurs. sent24: that the auspice occurs is not incorrect if that not the auspice but the terminologicalness occurs is not correct. sent25: the Eucharisticness does not occur or the burrlikeness does not occur or both if the emitting happens. sent26: that the anapesticness and the forfeit happens is caused by that the gravity-assist does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the burrlikeness occurs.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the Eucharisticness occurs.; sent7 & sent3 -> int2: the Eucharisticness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the burrlikeness does not occur.; sent14 & sent1 -> int5: both the wrestling and the terminologicalness occurs.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the emitting does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the burrlikeness does not occur and the emitting does not occur.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the auspice does not occur.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the departure does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the evangelicalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the terminologicalness occurs. sent2: the emitting does not occur if both the wrestling and the terminologicalness happens. sent3: the editorialness does not occur. sent4: that the wrestle does not occur triggers the non-editorialness and/or the non-terminologicalness. sent5: the deactivating knacker does not occur if the fact that both the deactivating knacker and the defrosting happens is wrong. sent6: if the non-burrlikeness and the non-Eucharisticness occurs then the departure does not occur. sent7: the Eucharisticness does not occur if the fact that the editorialness does not occur hold. sent8: if the pericardialness but not the euphonicness happens the flounce happens. sent9: if the confederating asserter happens the peacefulness occurs and the denigration does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the anapesticness happens hold then both the pericardialness and the non-euphonicness occurs. sent11: the intergalacticness does not occur. sent12: the fact that that the auspice does not occur is caused by that the burrlikeness does not occur and the emitting does not occur is not wrong. sent13: both the non-burrlikeness and the non-Eucharisticness occurs if the emitting occurs. sent14: the wrestling happens. sent15: that both the deactivating knacker and the defrosting occurs does not hold if the fact that the passionateness does not occur hold. sent16: if the burrlikeness happens then the Eucharisticness occurs. sent17: if the deactivating whaleboat does not occur the cascading sporozoite does not occur. sent18: the confederating Gur does not occur. sent19: the evangelicalness does not occur if the auspice does not occur. sent20: the gravity-assist does not occur if the fact that the peacefulness happens is not wrong. sent21: if that the deactivating knacker occurs is wrong the cascading backbone occurs and the wrestle does not occur. sent22: that the flounce happens triggers that the passionateness does not occur but the oviparousness happens. sent23: if the terminologicalness does not occur then the evangelicalness occurs. sent24: that the auspice occurs is not incorrect if that not the auspice but the terminologicalness occurs is not correct. sent25: the Eucharisticness does not occur or the burrlikeness does not occur or both if the emitting happens. sent26: that the anapesticness and the forfeit happens is caused by that the gravity-assist does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the burrlikeness occurs.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the Eucharisticness occurs.; sent7 & sent3 -> int2: the Eucharisticness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the burrlikeness does not occur.; sent14 & sent1 -> int5: both the wrestling and the terminologicalness occurs.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the emitting does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the burrlikeness does not occur and the emitting does not occur.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the auspice does not occur.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__