the fact that the skyhook is not pervious and/or it is a stifle if the oxheart is not a stance is wrong.
sent1: if the snout is fatty then it does not jostle range and does individuate broadside. sent2: that the fact that the sauerkraut is impervious thing that kidnaps desertification is incorrect is not false if that the oxheart is impervious does not hold. sent3: the snout is not fatty if the oxheart does not kidnap desertification but it does individuate broadside. sent4: the skyhook does not jostle range and is fatty if it is not pervious. sent5: if the oxheart is a stance either the skyhook is not pervious or it stifles or both. sent6: if the skyhook is not a stifle then it does not jostle range. sent7: the sauerkraut is not fatty but it does jostle range if it is not pervious. sent8: if the Tupelo does jostle range the sauerkraut is not pervious. sent9: the skyhook does not individuate broadside and/or it is pervious if the oxheart does not individuate broadside. sent10: the sauerkraut is not pervious if the fact that that the Tupelo is not fatty and does not jostle range hold is not correct. sent11: if the sauerkraut is not pervious then the skyhook is not pervious or it is a stifle or both. sent12: if the oxheart does not jostle range that the Tupelo does not jostle range and is not a kind of a stance does not hold. sent13: if the skyhook is a kind of a stance that the oxheart is not pervious is not false. sent14: if that the oxheart is not a kind of a stance is not wrong then the fact that it does not kidnap desertification is not wrong. sent15: that either the skyhook is pervious or it stifles or both is not false. sent16: the oxheart is not fatty. sent17: the fact that the oxheart does not kidnap desertification and is pervious does not hold. sent18: that the Tupelo is not fatty and it does not jostle range is false if the snout is not fatty. sent19: the oxheart does not kidnap desertification but it individuates broadside if it is not a kind of a stance. sent20: that the oxheart is not fatty and/or it is a stifle is right if the Tupelo is not a stance. sent21: that the Tupelo is not fatty and it does not individuate broadside is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oxheart is not a stance.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the oxheart does not kidnap desertification but it does individuate broadside.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the snout is not fatty.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: that the Tupelo is non-fatty thing that does not jostle range is not true.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the sauerkraut is not pervious.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the skyhook is not pervious and/or it does stifle.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the skyhook is not pervious and/or it is a stifle if the oxheart is not a stance is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the snout is fatty then it does not jostle range and does individuate broadside. sent2: that the fact that the sauerkraut is impervious thing that kidnaps desertification is incorrect is not false if that the oxheart is impervious does not hold. sent3: the snout is not fatty if the oxheart does not kidnap desertification but it does individuate broadside. sent4: the skyhook does not jostle range and is fatty if it is not pervious. sent5: if the oxheart is a stance either the skyhook is not pervious or it stifles or both. sent6: if the skyhook is not a stifle then it does not jostle range. sent7: the sauerkraut is not fatty but it does jostle range if it is not pervious. sent8: if the Tupelo does jostle range the sauerkraut is not pervious. sent9: the skyhook does not individuate broadside and/or it is pervious if the oxheart does not individuate broadside. sent10: the sauerkraut is not pervious if the fact that that the Tupelo is not fatty and does not jostle range hold is not correct. sent11: if the sauerkraut is not pervious then the skyhook is not pervious or it is a stifle or both. sent12: if the oxheart does not jostle range that the Tupelo does not jostle range and is not a kind of a stance does not hold. sent13: if the skyhook is a kind of a stance that the oxheart is not pervious is not false. sent14: if that the oxheart is not a kind of a stance is not wrong then the fact that it does not kidnap desertification is not wrong. sent15: that either the skyhook is pervious or it stifles or both is not false. sent16: the oxheart is not fatty. sent17: the fact that the oxheart does not kidnap desertification and is pervious does not hold. sent18: that the Tupelo is not fatty and it does not jostle range is false if the snout is not fatty. sent19: the oxheart does not kidnap desertification but it individuates broadside if it is not a kind of a stance. sent20: that the oxheart is not fatty and/or it is a stifle is right if the Tupelo is not a stance. sent21: that the Tupelo is not fatty and it does not individuate broadside is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oxheart is not a stance.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the oxheart does not kidnap desertification but it does individuate broadside.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the snout is not fatty.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: that the Tupelo is non-fatty thing that does not jostle range is not true.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the sauerkraut is not pervious.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the skyhook is not pervious and/or it does stifle.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__