that the teakettle does not starve but it is hermeneutic is not true.
sent1: if the hearthrug does not embrown AFSPC and is a kind of a cancellation then the cytosine is not a purity. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does jam fear and/or it is a kind of a acupressure is false the softness is a kind of a chutney. sent3: that the teakettle does not starve but it is hermeneutic is wrong if the fact that the softness is not a purity hold. sent4: that if the softness is a kind of a chutney the teakettle is a Beaverbrook hold. sent5: if something is a Chelidonium and it does jam teakettle it does not embrown AFSPC. sent6: if something is not a purity then that it does jam fear and/or it is a acupressure is not right. sent7: if something is a Beaverbrook it does not starve and it is hermeneutic. sent8: the group jams teakettle. sent9: the group is a kind of a Chelidonium. sent10: the fact that the fact that the hearthrug is a purity and not a chutney is wrong is correct if the humectant is a kind of a Beaverbrook. sent11: the fact that something is a kind of a Beaverbrook if it is a cancellation is not wrong. sent12: if the fact that the softness is not a kind of a acupressure or it is not a chutney or both hold then the masthead is a acupressure. sent13: the hearthrug does not embrown AFSPC and is a cancellation.
sent6 -> int1: if the cytosine is not a purity that it does jam fear and/or is a acupressure is not right.; sent1 & sent13 -> int2: that the cytosine is not a purity hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that either the cytosine does jam fear or it is a acupressure or both does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does jam fear or is a acupressure or both is incorrect.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the softness is a chutney.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the teakettle is a kind of a Beaverbrook.; sent7 -> int7: if the teakettle is a Beaverbrook it does not starve and it is not non-hermeneutic.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the teakettle does not starve but it is hermeneutic is false.
sent11 -> int8: if the humectant is a kind of a cancellation then it is a kind of a Beaverbrook.; sent5 -> int9: if the group is a kind of a Chelidonium and jams teakettle then it does not embrown AFSPC.; sent9 & sent8 -> int10: the group is a Chelidonium and it jams teakettle.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the group does not embrown AFSPC hold.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it does not embrown AFSPC.;
$hypothesis$ = that the teakettle does not starve but it is hermeneutic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hearthrug does not embrown AFSPC and is a kind of a cancellation then the cytosine is not a purity. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does jam fear and/or it is a kind of a acupressure is false the softness is a kind of a chutney. sent3: that the teakettle does not starve but it is hermeneutic is wrong if the fact that the softness is not a purity hold. sent4: that if the softness is a kind of a chutney the teakettle is a Beaverbrook hold. sent5: if something is a Chelidonium and it does jam teakettle it does not embrown AFSPC. sent6: if something is not a purity then that it does jam fear and/or it is a acupressure is not right. sent7: if something is a Beaverbrook it does not starve and it is hermeneutic. sent8: the group jams teakettle. sent9: the group is a kind of a Chelidonium. sent10: the fact that the fact that the hearthrug is a purity and not a chutney is wrong is correct if the humectant is a kind of a Beaverbrook. sent11: the fact that something is a kind of a Beaverbrook if it is a cancellation is not wrong. sent12: if the fact that the softness is not a kind of a acupressure or it is not a chutney or both hold then the masthead is a acupressure. sent13: the hearthrug does not embrown AFSPC and is a cancellation. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the cytosine is not a purity that it does jam fear and/or is a acupressure is not right.; sent1 & sent13 -> int2: that the cytosine is not a purity hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that either the cytosine does jam fear or it is a acupressure or both does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does jam fear or is a acupressure or both is incorrect.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the softness is a chutney.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the teakettle is a kind of a Beaverbrook.; sent7 -> int7: if the teakettle is a Beaverbrook it does not starve and it is not non-hermeneutic.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__