the simulation is non-azonal.
sent1: that the sunrise is both a funds and not unemotional does not hold. sent2: if something does surprise garage it is a funds and is not unemotional. sent3: the simulation is azonal and it surprises garage if the user is not cerebrovascular. sent4: if the fact that the SOB is explicable or it does negociate or both is not correct the simulation is not azonal. sent5: the sunrise is cerebrovascular. sent6: everything is not explicable. sent7: the user is uncompassionate if the sunrise is cerebrovascular but it does not surprise garage. sent8: that the sunrise is not unemotional is not incorrect.
sent2 -> int1: if the sunrise surprises garage then it is a funds and not unemotional.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunrise surprises garage.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sunrise is a funds and is not unemotional.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sunrise does not surprise garage.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the sunrise is cerebrovascular but it does not surprise garage.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the user is uncompassionate.; int6 -> int7: something is uncompassionate.;
the simulation is azonal.
sent6 -> int8: the cape is not explicable.;
$hypothesis$ = the simulation is non-azonal. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sunrise is both a funds and not unemotional does not hold. sent2: if something does surprise garage it is a funds and is not unemotional. sent3: the simulation is azonal and it surprises garage if the user is not cerebrovascular. sent4: if the fact that the SOB is explicable or it does negociate or both is not correct the simulation is not azonal. sent5: the sunrise is cerebrovascular. sent6: everything is not explicable. sent7: the user is uncompassionate if the sunrise is cerebrovascular but it does not surprise garage. sent8: that the sunrise is not unemotional is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the sunrise surprises garage then it is a funds and not unemotional.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunrise surprises garage.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sunrise is a funds and is not unemotional.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sunrise does not surprise garage.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the sunrise is cerebrovascular but it does not surprise garage.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the user is uncompassionate.; int6 -> int7: something is uncompassionate.; __UNKNOWN__