the bacitracin does not skim hesitation and is not inadequate.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not deduce potted hold that the benedick is not a pall and/or skims barley is not true. sent2: the bacitracin is not a pall. sent3: something is not a lantana if it is not a keratoconus and is not ineffective. sent4: if the fact that something does not unbar vaudevillian but it does skim hesitation is not right then it does not skim hesitation. sent5: the baseboard is not a mescaline if it does not acquaint. sent6: if the fact that either something does not pall or it skims barley or both is not true that it unbars vaudevillian hold. sent7: something is not inadequate if it does acquaint. sent8: there is nothing such that it is gonadotropic and does not acquaint. sent9: everything is not a keratoconus and not ineffective. sent10: the barley skims hesitation and it skims barley if it does not deduce potted. sent11: if the bacitracin does not skim demand then that it does not skim ringside and it is gonadotropic is wrong. sent12: if the fact that something is gonadotropic but it does not acquaint is false then it is not inadequate. sent13: the barley does not deduce potted. sent14: if the benedick is inadequate that the victimizer does not pall but it is rh-negative does not hold. sent15: if that the vaudevillian is not a kind of a lantana is not wrong then the barley does not deduce potted but it is a wireless. sent16: that the bacitracin does not unbar vaudevillian and skims hesitation is false if it is not a pall.
sent8 -> int1: that the bacitracin is gonadotropic thing that does not acquaint is wrong.; sent12 -> int2: if the fact that the bacitracin is gonadotropic and does not acquaint is wrong it is not inadequate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bacitracin is adequate.; sent4 -> int4: the bacitracin does not skim hesitation if the fact that it does not unbar vaudevillian and it does skim hesitation is false.; sent16 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the bacitracin does not unbar vaudevillian and skims hesitation is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bacitracin does not skim hesitation.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bacitracin does not skim hesitation and is not inadequate is incorrect.
sent6 -> int7: the benedick unbars vaudevillian if the fact that either it is not a pall or it skims barley or both does not hold.; sent3 -> int8: the tragus is not a lantana if it is not a keratoconus and it is not ineffective.; sent9 -> int9: the tragus is not a keratoconus and it is not ineffective.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the tragus is not a lantana.; int10 -> int11: everything is not a lantana.; int11 -> int12: the vaudevillian is not a lantana.; sent15 & int12 -> int13: the barley does not deduce potted and is a kind of a wireless.; int13 -> int14: the barley does not deduce potted.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it does not deduce potted.; sent1 & int15 -> int16: that the benedick either is not a pall or skims barley or both does not hold.; int7 & int16 -> int17: the benedick unbars vaudevillian.; int17 -> int18: something does unbar vaudevillian.;
$hypothesis$ = the bacitracin does not skim hesitation and is not inadequate. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not deduce potted hold that the benedick is not a pall and/or skims barley is not true. sent2: the bacitracin is not a pall. sent3: something is not a lantana if it is not a keratoconus and is not ineffective. sent4: if the fact that something does not unbar vaudevillian but it does skim hesitation is not right then it does not skim hesitation. sent5: the baseboard is not a mescaline if it does not acquaint. sent6: if the fact that either something does not pall or it skims barley or both is not true that it unbars vaudevillian hold. sent7: something is not inadequate if it does acquaint. sent8: there is nothing such that it is gonadotropic and does not acquaint. sent9: everything is not a keratoconus and not ineffective. sent10: the barley skims hesitation and it skims barley if it does not deduce potted. sent11: if the bacitracin does not skim demand then that it does not skim ringside and it is gonadotropic is wrong. sent12: if the fact that something is gonadotropic but it does not acquaint is false then it is not inadequate. sent13: the barley does not deduce potted. sent14: if the benedick is inadequate that the victimizer does not pall but it is rh-negative does not hold. sent15: if that the vaudevillian is not a kind of a lantana is not wrong then the barley does not deduce potted but it is a wireless. sent16: that the bacitracin does not unbar vaudevillian and skims hesitation is false if it is not a pall. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: that the bacitracin is gonadotropic thing that does not acquaint is wrong.; sent12 -> int2: if the fact that the bacitracin is gonadotropic and does not acquaint is wrong it is not inadequate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bacitracin is adequate.; sent4 -> int4: the bacitracin does not skim hesitation if the fact that it does not unbar vaudevillian and it does skim hesitation is false.; sent16 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the bacitracin does not unbar vaudevillian and skims hesitation is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bacitracin does not skim hesitation.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__