that the shuffling but not the Tuscanness occurs is caused by that the rivaling calcium-cyanamide does not occur.
sent1: if the rivaling calcium-cyanamide occurs then the hormonalness does not occur and the shooting jig happens. sent2: the fact that the eventuality does not occur is not false. sent3: the hormonalness does not occur. sent4: the commutating posse occurs. sent5: the shooting mugger does not occur and the acyclicness happens. sent6: the hormonalness does not occur if the rivaling calcium-cyanamide does not occur. sent7: that the shuffle and the non-Tuscanness occurs is brought about by that the rivaling calcium-cyanamide happens. sent8: the fantasizing occurs if not the optimisticness but the assaying happens. sent9: that the paranormalness occurs and the oracularness does not occur yields that the scheduling does not occur. sent10: the shower occurs. sent11: that the rivaling calcium-cyanamide does not occur results in that both the non-hormonalness and the shooting jig occurs. sent12: that the punch-up occurs brings about that the formation but not the rivaling Beaverbrook occurs. sent13: the formation occurs. sent14: the confutation occurs. sent15: the shuffling happens if the hormonalness does not occur but the shooting jig occurs. sent16: the punch-up happens. sent17: that both the hormonalness and the shooting jig occurs causes the shuffle. sent18: the shooting narrow-mindedness occurs but the Puranicness does not occur. sent19: if the punch-up happens then the formation happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rivaling calcium-cyanamide does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the hormonalness does not occur but the shooting jig happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the shuffle happens.; sent12 & sent16 -> int3: the formation happens and the rivaling Beaverbrook does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the shuffling but not the Tuscanness occurs is caused by that the rivaling calcium-cyanamide does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rivaling calcium-cyanamide occurs then the hormonalness does not occur and the shooting jig happens. sent2: the fact that the eventuality does not occur is not false. sent3: the hormonalness does not occur. sent4: the commutating posse occurs. sent5: the shooting mugger does not occur and the acyclicness happens. sent6: the hormonalness does not occur if the rivaling calcium-cyanamide does not occur. sent7: that the shuffle and the non-Tuscanness occurs is brought about by that the rivaling calcium-cyanamide happens. sent8: the fantasizing occurs if not the optimisticness but the assaying happens. sent9: that the paranormalness occurs and the oracularness does not occur yields that the scheduling does not occur. sent10: the shower occurs. sent11: that the rivaling calcium-cyanamide does not occur results in that both the non-hormonalness and the shooting jig occurs. sent12: that the punch-up occurs brings about that the formation but not the rivaling Beaverbrook occurs. sent13: the formation occurs. sent14: the confutation occurs. sent15: the shuffling happens if the hormonalness does not occur but the shooting jig occurs. sent16: the punch-up happens. sent17: that both the hormonalness and the shooting jig occurs causes the shuffle. sent18: the shooting narrow-mindedness occurs but the Puranicness does not occur. sent19: if the punch-up happens then the formation happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rivaling calcium-cyanamide does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the hormonalness does not occur but the shooting jig happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the shuffle happens.; sent12 & sent16 -> int3: the formation happens and the rivaling Beaverbrook does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__