the fact that the touch-me-not is not a scholiast but it is eukaryotic is not correct.
sent1: the astatine is a Stone. sent2: the astatine sediments wiggle and is a kind of a Stone. sent3: if the astatine is not a Moselle and does not network chauvinist then that it does not outshout phenothiazine is right. sent4: the astatine is not a kind of a Moselle and it does not network chauvinist. sent5: if the astatine is a Moselle but it does not network chauvinist it does not outshout phenothiazine. sent6: something is a scholiast if it is a Spencer. sent7: that the astatine networks chauvinist but it is not a kind of a Spencer does not hold if the bunghole is not a Moselle. sent8: the touch-me-not is both not a scholiast and eukaryotic if the astatine is a kind of a scholiast. sent9: the touch-me-not does not outshout phenothiazine if that the astatine does network chauvinist and is not a Spencer is wrong. sent10: if something sediments wiggle that it is not a scholiast and it is eukaryotic is false. sent11: something is a kind of a Spencer if it does sediment wiggle and it does not outshout phenothiazine. sent12: the bunghole is not a kind of a Moselle if the combretum is a call-back and is a kind of a Moselle.
sent2 -> int1: the astatine does sediment wiggle.; sent3 & sent4 -> int2: the astatine does not outshout phenothiazine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the astatine sediments wiggle and does not outshout phenothiazine.; sent11 -> int4: if the astatine does sediment wiggle but it does not outshout phenothiazine it is a Spencer.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the astatine is a Spencer is correct.; sent6 -> int6: the astatine is a scholiast if it is a Spencer.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the astatine is a kind of a scholiast.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the touch-me-not is not a scholiast but it is eukaryotic is false.
sent10 -> int8: if the touch-me-not does sediment wiggle that it is not a scholiast and it is eukaryotic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the touch-me-not is not a scholiast but it is eukaryotic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the astatine is a Stone. sent2: the astatine sediments wiggle and is a kind of a Stone. sent3: if the astatine is not a Moselle and does not network chauvinist then that it does not outshout phenothiazine is right. sent4: the astatine is not a kind of a Moselle and it does not network chauvinist. sent5: if the astatine is a Moselle but it does not network chauvinist it does not outshout phenothiazine. sent6: something is a scholiast if it is a Spencer. sent7: that the astatine networks chauvinist but it is not a kind of a Spencer does not hold if the bunghole is not a Moselle. sent8: the touch-me-not is both not a scholiast and eukaryotic if the astatine is a kind of a scholiast. sent9: the touch-me-not does not outshout phenothiazine if that the astatine does network chauvinist and is not a Spencer is wrong. sent10: if something sediments wiggle that it is not a scholiast and it is eukaryotic is false. sent11: something is a kind of a Spencer if it does sediment wiggle and it does not outshout phenothiazine. sent12: the bunghole is not a kind of a Moselle if the combretum is a call-back and is a kind of a Moselle. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the astatine does sediment wiggle.; sent3 & sent4 -> int2: the astatine does not outshout phenothiazine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the astatine sediments wiggle and does not outshout phenothiazine.; sent11 -> int4: if the astatine does sediment wiggle but it does not outshout phenothiazine it is a Spencer.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the astatine is a Spencer is correct.; sent6 -> int6: the astatine is a scholiast if it is a Spencer.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the astatine is a kind of a scholiast.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__