that the express does not suborn remission and is not medieval is not correct.
sent1: that the express does not suborn remission and is not medieval is not true if it is not audiometric. sent2: the flap is non-insatiate thing that is a dendrobium if the cinch is not a crystallite. sent3: the cinch is not a dendrobium but it is insatiate. sent4: if the chlorination is not insatiate that the flap is not a crystallite and it is not insatiate is not correct. sent5: the fact that the chlorination suborns meadowgrass and is not insatiate is incorrect if the flap is not insatiate. sent6: the theremin is not a crystallite. sent7: the meadowgrass is a quietist. sent8: if that the flap does not suborn meadowgrass is not false the cinch is not a dendrobium but it gathers express. sent9: if the chlorination is not insatiate then the fact that the flap is not a crystallite but it is insatiate does not hold. sent10: the flap is plumbaginaceous. sent11: if the meadowgrass is a yawner and/or it is a quietist then the chlorination is not insatiate. sent12: if the meadowgrass does not suborn remission the express is not a quietist. sent13: the express is not audiometric if something that is not a dendrobium gathers express. sent14: if the cinch is a crystallite the flap does not gather express. sent15: the fact that the express is not a quietist is true. sent16: if the fact that the flap is a kind of a dendrobium is not false then the cinch does not suborn meadowgrass.
sent7 -> int1: the meadowgrass is a yawner and/or is a kind of a quietist.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the chlorination is not insatiate.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the flap is not a kind of a crystallite and it is not insatiate is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the express does not suborn remission and is not medieval is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the express does not suborn remission and is not medieval is not true if it is not audiometric. sent2: the flap is non-insatiate thing that is a dendrobium if the cinch is not a crystallite. sent3: the cinch is not a dendrobium but it is insatiate. sent4: if the chlorination is not insatiate that the flap is not a crystallite and it is not insatiate is not correct. sent5: the fact that the chlorination suborns meadowgrass and is not insatiate is incorrect if the flap is not insatiate. sent6: the theremin is not a crystallite. sent7: the meadowgrass is a quietist. sent8: if that the flap does not suborn meadowgrass is not false the cinch is not a dendrobium but it gathers express. sent9: if the chlorination is not insatiate then the fact that the flap is not a crystallite but it is insatiate does not hold. sent10: the flap is plumbaginaceous. sent11: if the meadowgrass is a yawner and/or it is a quietist then the chlorination is not insatiate. sent12: if the meadowgrass does not suborn remission the express is not a quietist. sent13: the express is not audiometric if something that is not a dendrobium gathers express. sent14: if the cinch is a crystallite the flap does not gather express. sent15: the fact that the express is not a quietist is true. sent16: if the fact that the flap is a kind of a dendrobium is not false then the cinch does not suborn meadowgrass. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the meadowgrass is a yawner and/or is a kind of a quietist.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the chlorination is not insatiate.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the flap is not a kind of a crystallite and it is not insatiate is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__