the Lander is a guy but it is not vulpine if the finch is not operable.
sent1: if the pigmentation is not operable the finch is a kind of a Didion that is not a kind of a compounded. sent2: if something is a cackler then it is vulpine and it is not a guy. sent3: if the pigmentation is not vulpine then the Lander is a kind of a guy. sent4: something does not function countrywoman if that it is not Hippocratic and it is radiolucent is not true. sent5: the Lander does function countrywoman and it is vulpine if the finch is not vulpine. sent6: the Lander guys and it is vulpine. sent7: if something is not radiolucent then it does not function countrywoman. sent8: that the finch is not Hippocratic but it is radiolucent is wrong if it is not operable. sent9: if something is vulpine thing that is not a guy it does not halve Arendt. sent10: that the Lander does not function countrywoman is not false. sent11: the pigmentation does function countrywoman if the finch does not function countrywoman. sent12: the Lander is vulpine and not radiolucent if that the finch does function countrywoman is not false. sent13: the Jewess halves Arendt. sent14: the Lander is a guy but it is non-vulpine if the pigmentation is not non-vulpine. sent15: if something functions countrywoman and halves Arendt it is not vulpine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the finch is not operable.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the finch is not Hippocratic but it is radiolucent does not hold.; sent4 -> int2: the finch does not function countrywoman if the fact that it is not Hippocratic and it is radiolucent is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the finch does not function countrywoman.; sent15 -> int4: that the pigmentation is not vulpine is not incorrect if it functions countrywoman and halves Arendt.;
the finch is a Didion but it is not a kind of a compounded.
sent9 -> int5: the pigmentation does not halve Arendt if it is vulpine and not a guy.; sent2 -> int6: the pigmentation is vulpine but it is not a guy if it is a cackler.;
$hypothesis$ = the Lander is a guy but it is not vulpine if the finch is not operable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pigmentation is not operable the finch is a kind of a Didion that is not a kind of a compounded. sent2: if something is a cackler then it is vulpine and it is not a guy. sent3: if the pigmentation is not vulpine then the Lander is a kind of a guy. sent4: something does not function countrywoman if that it is not Hippocratic and it is radiolucent is not true. sent5: the Lander does function countrywoman and it is vulpine if the finch is not vulpine. sent6: the Lander guys and it is vulpine. sent7: if something is not radiolucent then it does not function countrywoman. sent8: that the finch is not Hippocratic but it is radiolucent is wrong if it is not operable. sent9: if something is vulpine thing that is not a guy it does not halve Arendt. sent10: that the Lander does not function countrywoman is not false. sent11: the pigmentation does function countrywoman if the finch does not function countrywoman. sent12: the Lander is vulpine and not radiolucent if that the finch does function countrywoman is not false. sent13: the Jewess halves Arendt. sent14: the Lander is a guy but it is non-vulpine if the pigmentation is not non-vulpine. sent15: if something functions countrywoman and halves Arendt it is not vulpine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the finch is not operable.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the finch is not Hippocratic but it is radiolucent does not hold.; sent4 -> int2: the finch does not function countrywoman if the fact that it is not Hippocratic and it is radiolucent is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the finch does not function countrywoman.; sent15 -> int4: that the pigmentation is not vulpine is not incorrect if it functions countrywoman and halves Arendt.; __UNKNOWN__