the Bedouin does not gather actinism.
sent1: if the fact that something does gather actinism but it does not invoke coccobacillus does not hold then it is not Episcopal. sent2: if the Bedouin gathers actinism the coccobacillus invokes coccobacillus. sent3: that something gathers actinism but it does not invoke coccobacillus is wrong if it is consular. sent4: that the acaricide is not Episcopal hold if it is a sharp. sent5: the coccobacillus is consular. sent6: if the coccobacillus invokes coccobacillus and it is consular the fact that the opportunist does not invoke patent is right. sent7: the acaricide is a sharp. sent8: if the fact that that the acaricide is not antemeridian and does not invoke patent is true is not correct it is Episcopal. sent9: that the acaricide is a kind of non-antemeridian thing that does not invoke patent does not hold if the opportunist does not invoke patent. sent10: if something that does not invoke coccobacillus is not consular then that it gathers actinism is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Bedouin gathers actinism.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the coccobacillus invokes coccobacillus.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the coccobacillus does invoke coccobacillus and is not non-consular.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the opportunist does not invoke patent.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the acaricide is not antemeridian and does not invoke patent is false.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the acaricide is Episcopal.; sent4 & sent7 -> int6: the acaricide is not Episcopal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Bedouin is not Episcopal.
sent1 -> int8: if that the Bedouin gathers actinism and does not invoke coccobacillus is wrong it is not Episcopal.; sent3 -> int9: the fact that the Bedouin does gather actinism but it does not invoke coccobacillus is not true if it is consular.;
$hypothesis$ = the Bedouin does not gather actinism. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does gather actinism but it does not invoke coccobacillus does not hold then it is not Episcopal. sent2: if the Bedouin gathers actinism the coccobacillus invokes coccobacillus. sent3: that something gathers actinism but it does not invoke coccobacillus is wrong if it is consular. sent4: that the acaricide is not Episcopal hold if it is a sharp. sent5: the coccobacillus is consular. sent6: if the coccobacillus invokes coccobacillus and it is consular the fact that the opportunist does not invoke patent is right. sent7: the acaricide is a sharp. sent8: if the fact that that the acaricide is not antemeridian and does not invoke patent is true is not correct it is Episcopal. sent9: that the acaricide is a kind of non-antemeridian thing that does not invoke patent does not hold if the opportunist does not invoke patent. sent10: if something that does not invoke coccobacillus is not consular then that it gathers actinism is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Bedouin gathers actinism.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the coccobacillus invokes coccobacillus.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the coccobacillus does invoke coccobacillus and is not non-consular.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the opportunist does not invoke patent.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the acaricide is not antemeridian and does not invoke patent is false.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the acaricide is Episcopal.; sent4 & sent7 -> int6: the acaricide is not Episcopal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__