the fig does not prepare sharpshooter but it does lug.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is sugary and does not compromise Silvia does not hold then the riverbank does not dab at. sent2: if the fact that the riverbank does dab Hubel is not incorrect it does dab at. sent3: the justice is a redeployment if the riverbank is a redeployment. sent4: if the fact that the Crow does compromise appealing is correct it dabs Hubel. sent5: the Crow compromises appealing. sent6: The Hubel does dab riverbank. sent7: if the justice is a redeployment the goldenbush does not compromise Silvia. sent8: if the goldenbush is a kind of a redeployment that that the justice is sugary and does not compromise Silvia is not wrong does not hold. sent9: if the Crow does not lug then the fig does not prepare sharpshooter but it is a lug. sent10: the Crow does not lug if there is something such that that either it is a kind of a gallop or it is not a kind of a veteran or both does not hold. sent11: if the goldenbush gallops and/or it is not a veteran it is a kind of a redeployment. sent12: either the thermosphere is tetravalent or it dabs at or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the goldenbush is a kind of a gallop and/or it is not a veteran.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the goldenbush is a redeployment.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the justice is sugary but it does not compromise Silvia does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of sugary thing that does not compromise Silvia does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the riverbank does not dab at is not incorrect.;
the fact that the fig does not prepare sharpshooter but it is a kind of a lug is false.
sent4 & sent5 -> int5: the Crow dabs Hubel.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it dabs Hubel.;
$hypothesis$ = the fig does not prepare sharpshooter but it does lug. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is sugary and does not compromise Silvia does not hold then the riverbank does not dab at. sent2: if the fact that the riverbank does dab Hubel is not incorrect it does dab at. sent3: the justice is a redeployment if the riverbank is a redeployment. sent4: if the fact that the Crow does compromise appealing is correct it dabs Hubel. sent5: the Crow compromises appealing. sent6: The Hubel does dab riverbank. sent7: if the justice is a redeployment the goldenbush does not compromise Silvia. sent8: if the goldenbush is a kind of a redeployment that that the justice is sugary and does not compromise Silvia is not wrong does not hold. sent9: if the Crow does not lug then the fig does not prepare sharpshooter but it is a lug. sent10: the Crow does not lug if there is something such that that either it is a kind of a gallop or it is not a kind of a veteran or both does not hold. sent11: if the goldenbush gallops and/or it is not a veteran it is a kind of a redeployment. sent12: either the thermosphere is tetravalent or it dabs at or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the goldenbush is a kind of a gallop and/or it is not a veteran.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the goldenbush is a redeployment.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the justice is sugary but it does not compromise Silvia does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of sugary thing that does not compromise Silvia does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the riverbank does not dab at is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__