the Mahdist is appellate.
sent1: The latest does not bog barren. sent2: the jewfish is stomatous. sent3: if the chlorine is prepositional then the fodder does rob. sent4: if something that is a horsehair is not a exotherm it is stomatous. sent5: the barren robs if the chlorine robs. sent6: the chlorine is not a Rahu if the fodder is not a kind of a Rahu. sent7: something that is not a Rahu is a kind of expansionist thing that does rob. sent8: if something does not bog latest it is a kind of a gaggle and it does not winnow stabber. sent9: either the snowmobile is prepositional or it is non-stomatous or both if the barren does rob. sent10: the Mahdist is appellate if the jewfish is a Rahu. sent11: if the barren does not bog latest then it is a kind of a horsehair that is not a kind of a exotherm. sent12: the jewfish robs. sent13: the Mahdist is not appellate if the barren is not appellate and it does bog latest. sent14: the goldeneye is stomatous. sent15: if the goldeneye is expansionist then the jewfish is a Rahu. sent16: if the fodder robs that the goldeneye is not expansionist is wrong. sent17: the barren is prepositional. sent18: if the barren is stomatous the chlorine is prepositional. sent19: the barren is not a exotherm. sent20: the barren is not a exotherm if it does not bog latest.
sent4 -> int1: the barren is stomatous if it is a horsehair that is not a kind of a exotherm.;
the Mahdist is not appellate.
$hypothesis$ = the Mahdist is appellate. ; $context$ = sent1: The latest does not bog barren. sent2: the jewfish is stomatous. sent3: if the chlorine is prepositional then the fodder does rob. sent4: if something that is a horsehair is not a exotherm it is stomatous. sent5: the barren robs if the chlorine robs. sent6: the chlorine is not a Rahu if the fodder is not a kind of a Rahu. sent7: something that is not a Rahu is a kind of expansionist thing that does rob. sent8: if something does not bog latest it is a kind of a gaggle and it does not winnow stabber. sent9: either the snowmobile is prepositional or it is non-stomatous or both if the barren does rob. sent10: the Mahdist is appellate if the jewfish is a Rahu. sent11: if the barren does not bog latest then it is a kind of a horsehair that is not a kind of a exotherm. sent12: the jewfish robs. sent13: the Mahdist is not appellate if the barren is not appellate and it does bog latest. sent14: the goldeneye is stomatous. sent15: if the goldeneye is expansionist then the jewfish is a Rahu. sent16: if the fodder robs that the goldeneye is not expansionist is wrong. sent17: the barren is prepositional. sent18: if the barren is stomatous the chlorine is prepositional. sent19: the barren is not a exotherm. sent20: the barren is not a exotherm if it does not bog latest. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the barren is stomatous if it is a horsehair that is not a kind of a exotherm.; __UNKNOWN__