the bluejacket is prismatic.
sent1: if something does not space then that it does not neglect doormat and is a theme is not true. sent2: something that sentimentalises dowser is prismatic. sent3: that the archegonium does neglect brilliance and is rayless does not hold. sent4: the fact that the fact that something does not neglect doormat and is not a theme is wrong if it does not space is right. sent5: the fact that the hamstring does not neglect doormat but it themes does not hold. sent6: if the hamstring themes the dowser does not neglect doormat. sent7: that the hamstring does not neglect doormat and is not a kind of a theme hold if the dowser does rationalize archegonium. sent8: if the scale is a promethazine then the fact that it sentimentalises dowser and is not a spaced is wrong. sent9: the hamstring is not a theme if the dowser does rationalize archegonium. sent10: if the fact that the hamstring does space is not right then the fact that it does not neglect doormat and it does theme does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that it is not rayless. sent12: the fact that the hamstring is not a spaced is not false. sent13: there exists something such that it is not prismatic. sent14: that the archegonium neglects brilliance is right if it is a theme. sent15: the hamstring does not theme. sent16: something that does not rationalize archegonium is not prismatic. sent17: the bluejacket sentimentalises dowser if there is something such that the fact that it does neglect brilliance and it is not rayless does not hold. sent18: the bluejacket does rationalize archegonium if there exists something such that that it sentimentalises dowser and it is not prismatic does not hold. sent19: if something does not rationalize archegonium it does neglect bluejacket and it does not neglect Psocoptera. sent20: the scale is a promethazine if that it does not lime Chicano and is not a promethazine is not right. sent21: the dowser rationalizes archegonium if something that neglects brilliance is not rayless.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archegonium does neglect brilliance and is not rayless.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it neglects brilliance and is not rayless.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the dowser rationalizes archegonium.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the hamstring does not neglect doormat and it is not a theme is not false.; sent4 -> int4: if the hamstring is not a spaced then that it does not neglect doormat and it does not theme is false.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the hamstring does not neglect doormat and it is not a theme is wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the archegonium does neglect brilliance and is not rayless is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it neglects brilliance and is not rayless is not true.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the bluejacket sentimentalises dowser.; sent2 -> int10: the bluejacket is prismatic if it does sentimentalise dowser.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
something neglects bluejacket and does not neglect Psocoptera.
sent19 -> int11: if the dowser does not rationalize archegonium it neglects bluejacket and it does not neglect Psocoptera.;
$hypothesis$ = the bluejacket is prismatic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not space then that it does not neglect doormat and is a theme is not true. sent2: something that sentimentalises dowser is prismatic. sent3: that the archegonium does neglect brilliance and is rayless does not hold. sent4: the fact that the fact that something does not neglect doormat and is not a theme is wrong if it does not space is right. sent5: the fact that the hamstring does not neglect doormat but it themes does not hold. sent6: if the hamstring themes the dowser does not neglect doormat. sent7: that the hamstring does not neglect doormat and is not a kind of a theme hold if the dowser does rationalize archegonium. sent8: if the scale is a promethazine then the fact that it sentimentalises dowser and is not a spaced is wrong. sent9: the hamstring is not a theme if the dowser does rationalize archegonium. sent10: if the fact that the hamstring does space is not right then the fact that it does not neglect doormat and it does theme does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that it is not rayless. sent12: the fact that the hamstring is not a spaced is not false. sent13: there exists something such that it is not prismatic. sent14: that the archegonium neglects brilliance is right if it is a theme. sent15: the hamstring does not theme. sent16: something that does not rationalize archegonium is not prismatic. sent17: the bluejacket sentimentalises dowser if there is something such that the fact that it does neglect brilliance and it is not rayless does not hold. sent18: the bluejacket does rationalize archegonium if there exists something such that that it sentimentalises dowser and it is not prismatic does not hold. sent19: if something does not rationalize archegonium it does neglect bluejacket and it does not neglect Psocoptera. sent20: the scale is a promethazine if that it does not lime Chicano and is not a promethazine is not right. sent21: the dowser rationalizes archegonium if something that neglects brilliance is not rayless. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archegonium does neglect brilliance and is not rayless.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it neglects brilliance and is not rayless.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the dowser rationalizes archegonium.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the hamstring does not neglect doormat and it is not a theme is not false.; sent4 -> int4: if the hamstring is not a spaced then that it does not neglect doormat and it does not theme is false.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the hamstring does not neglect doormat and it is not a theme is wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the archegonium does neglect brilliance and is not rayless is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it neglects brilliance and is not rayless is not true.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the bluejacket sentimentalises dowser.; sent2 -> int10: the bluejacket is prismatic if it does sentimentalise dowser.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__