the olfactoriness does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that both the avarice and the non-olfactoriness occurs does not hold the fact that the olfactoriness happens hold. sent2: if the fact that the chinning but not the reunion occurs is not true then the reunion happens. sent3: if the competition does not occur then that the avarice and the non-olfactoriness happens does not hold. sent4: the avarice and the competition happens. sent5: the fact that the chin but not the reunion happens does not hold. sent6: the light-dutiness does not occur if both the avarice and the reunion occurs. sent7: the olfactoriness does not occur if the fact that the light-dutiness does not occur is not wrong.
sent4 -> int1: the avarice happens.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the reunion occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the avarice occurs and the reunion occurs.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the light-dutiness does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the olfactoriness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the olfactoriness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that both the avarice and the non-olfactoriness occurs does not hold the fact that the olfactoriness happens hold. sent2: if the fact that the chinning but not the reunion occurs is not true then the reunion happens. sent3: if the competition does not occur then that the avarice and the non-olfactoriness happens does not hold. sent4: the avarice and the competition happens. sent5: the fact that the chin but not the reunion happens does not hold. sent6: the light-dutiness does not occur if both the avarice and the reunion occurs. sent7: the olfactoriness does not occur if the fact that the light-dutiness does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the avarice happens.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the reunion occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the avarice occurs and the reunion occurs.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the light-dutiness does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__