the sternum does not barbarize cappuccino.
sent1: there exists something such that it does overturn animosity. sent2: there exists something such that it does not overturn animosity. sent3: if the copperware does cleave that the crewman is not a nautilus and not a mold is not true. sent4: the copperware cleaves if the brail is diamagnetic. sent5: the Congolese is a kind of a mold if there is something such that it does overturn godown and it overturns animosity. sent6: if the brail is meteoric then the fact that it is diamagnetic is not wrong. sent7: the sternum is not a mold. sent8: something barbarizes cappuccino if it overturns godown. sent9: that the sitter does overturn animosity hold. sent10: the Congolese is an ecology. sent11: if that something overturns animosity but it is not woody does not hold it is woody. sent12: the trout does overturn godown if the plaice does mold. sent13: there is something such that that it overturns godown is true. sent14: that if there exists something such that it is diamagnetic the fact that the sternum does not barbarize cappuccino hold is right. sent15: if something does cleave then it is a nautilus. sent16: if there exists something such that it is diamagnetic and/or it is a nautilus then the sternum does not barbarize cappuccino. sent17: if that the Congolese does not barbarize cappuccino and does not overturn animosity is incorrect then that the sternum does barbarize cappuccino is not incorrect. sent18: if something is a mold it does cleave.
sent18 -> int1: if the fact that the Congolese is a mold is not incorrect it does cleave.; sent15 -> int2: the Congolese is a nautilus if it does cleave.;
the hail is woody and does group semblance.
sent11 -> int3: if that the hail does overturn animosity and is not woody is not true then it is woody.;
$hypothesis$ = the sternum does not barbarize cappuccino. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does overturn animosity. sent2: there exists something such that it does not overturn animosity. sent3: if the copperware does cleave that the crewman is not a nautilus and not a mold is not true. sent4: the copperware cleaves if the brail is diamagnetic. sent5: the Congolese is a kind of a mold if there is something such that it does overturn godown and it overturns animosity. sent6: if the brail is meteoric then the fact that it is diamagnetic is not wrong. sent7: the sternum is not a mold. sent8: something barbarizes cappuccino if it overturns godown. sent9: that the sitter does overturn animosity hold. sent10: the Congolese is an ecology. sent11: if that something overturns animosity but it is not woody does not hold it is woody. sent12: the trout does overturn godown if the plaice does mold. sent13: there is something such that that it overturns godown is true. sent14: that if there exists something such that it is diamagnetic the fact that the sternum does not barbarize cappuccino hold is right. sent15: if something does cleave then it is a nautilus. sent16: if there exists something such that it is diamagnetic and/or it is a nautilus then the sternum does not barbarize cappuccino. sent17: if that the Congolese does not barbarize cappuccino and does not overturn animosity is incorrect then that the sternum does barbarize cappuccino is not incorrect. sent18: if something is a mold it does cleave. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: if the fact that the Congolese is a mold is not incorrect it does cleave.; sent15 -> int2: the Congolese is a nautilus if it does cleave.; __UNKNOWN__