there exists something such that if it does suppurate then the fact that it is not a Planococcus and not a parka does not hold.
sent1: if the bentwood is a Isurus that it is not a graniteware and is not a Hannover is wrong. sent2: if the bentwood does suppurate then that it is not a Planococcus and it is a parka is not true. sent3: if that the benzocaine is pyrectic is right the fact that it is a spell and not arthromeric is not true. sent4: if the fact that something does deflower Micawber is not false then the fact that it is not a hardwood and does not jacket paramagnetism is not right. sent5: the fact that something does not jacket genius and it is not rationalist is not right if the fact that it is a kind of a echocardiograph is not incorrect. sent6: if the bentwood suppurates then the fact that it is a Planococcus and it is not a parka is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the paramagnetism is not unadoptable and it is not a boyhood does not hold if it is an innings. sent8: the fact that the lineman is not a parka and does not deflower paramagnetism is incorrect if it palatalizes Peruvian. sent9: if that the bentwood is a Planococcus is not wrong the fact that it does not jacket bentwood and does not double is wrong. sent10: if the bentwood is forcipate then the fact that it is not a hindquarter and it does not palatalize moosewood does not hold. sent11: that the almandite does not deflower paramagnetism and is not a kind of a fulcrum is not right if it is backward. sent12: if the bentwood suppurates then it is not a kind of a Planococcus and it is not a kind of a parka. sent13: there is something such that if it does suppurate then the fact that it is not a Planococcus and it is a parka is wrong. sent14: there is something such that if it is a dewberry that it is non-calligraphic thing that does not ignore Arendt is wrong. sent15: there is something such that if it suppurates then that it is a kind of a Planococcus that is not a parka does not hold. sent16: the fact that there exists something such that if it suppurates it is not a Planococcus and it is not a kind of a parka is true. sent17: if the bentwood suppurates then the fact that it is not a kind of a Planococcus and it is not a parka is incorrect.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does deflower Micawber the fact that it is not a hardwood and it does not jacket paramagnetism does not hold.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that if the cyborg deflowers Micawber the fact that the cyborg is not a hardwood and it does not jacket paramagnetism is not right is correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does suppurate then the fact that it is not a Planococcus and not a parka does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bentwood is a Isurus that it is not a graniteware and is not a Hannover is wrong. sent2: if the bentwood does suppurate then that it is not a Planococcus and it is a parka is not true. sent3: if that the benzocaine is pyrectic is right the fact that it is a spell and not arthromeric is not true. sent4: if the fact that something does deflower Micawber is not false then the fact that it is not a hardwood and does not jacket paramagnetism is not right. sent5: the fact that something does not jacket genius and it is not rationalist is not right if the fact that it is a kind of a echocardiograph is not incorrect. sent6: if the bentwood suppurates then the fact that it is a Planococcus and it is not a parka is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the paramagnetism is not unadoptable and it is not a boyhood does not hold if it is an innings. sent8: the fact that the lineman is not a parka and does not deflower paramagnetism is incorrect if it palatalizes Peruvian. sent9: if that the bentwood is a Planococcus is not wrong the fact that it does not jacket bentwood and does not double is wrong. sent10: if the bentwood is forcipate then the fact that it is not a hindquarter and it does not palatalize moosewood does not hold. sent11: that the almandite does not deflower paramagnetism and is not a kind of a fulcrum is not right if it is backward. sent12: if the bentwood suppurates then it is not a kind of a Planococcus and it is not a kind of a parka. sent13: there is something such that if it does suppurate then the fact that it is not a Planococcus and it is a parka is wrong. sent14: there is something such that if it is a dewberry that it is non-calligraphic thing that does not ignore Arendt is wrong. sent15: there is something such that if it suppurates then that it is a kind of a Planococcus that is not a parka does not hold. sent16: the fact that there exists something such that if it suppurates it is not a Planococcus and it is not a kind of a parka is true. sent17: if the bentwood suppurates then the fact that it is not a kind of a Planococcus and it is not a parka is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__