the shellflower is non-ahistorical.
sent1: something does not denationalize metacenter if it does not grit. sent2: if the wake does denationalize metacenter then the fact that either it is not a platform or it is not a imperfectibility or both is wrong. sent3: the wake denationalizes metacenter. sent4: if that the wake does not denationalize metacenter or it is a platform or both does not hold it is not trustworthy. sent5: if something is not a bill then it is not cheliferous. sent6: if that something is not a platform and/or it is not a kind of a imperfectibility is not right then it is not cheliferous. sent7: if the spud does not denationalize metacenter then the fact that the mail is both a imperfectibility and not a platform does not hold. sent8: that the shellflower is not trustworthy and not a bill does not hold if there exists something such that it is ahistorical. sent9: the shellflower is trustworthy if the fact that it is ahistorical hold. sent10: something is not cheliferous if that it is a platform or not a imperfectibility or both is false. sent11: the wake is not cheliferous if the fact that it is a kind of a platform or it is not a imperfectibility or both is not true. sent12: The metacenter denationalizes wake. sent13: the bitch is not a bill if there is something such that that it is a imperfectibility and it is not a platform is incorrect. sent14: if the mail does not grit and denationalizes metacenter the bitch is a imperfectibility. sent15: the houseplant is trustworthy if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-trustworthy thing that does not bill is not right. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is a nonparticipant is not false then that the spud does not denationalize Yorktown and does conscript wall is wrong. sent17: if the wake does bill then it is cheliferous. sent18: the wake is ahistorical if something is a imperfectibility but not cheliferous. sent19: something is not cheliferous if the fact that it is not a platform and/or it is a imperfectibility is false. sent20: if the fact that the bitch is not trustworthy and/or is not cheliferous is true the wake is not trustworthy. sent21: the neem is a nonparticipant. sent22: if the fact that something does not denationalize Yorktown and does conscript wall is wrong then that it is not a grits is not incorrect. sent23: the bitch is not cheliferous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a platform and is cheliferous is not true. sent24: the fact that the spud is a platform and is cheliferous is false. sent25: something is not a grits but it does denationalize metacenter if it does not conscript wall.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shellflower is ahistorical.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the shellflower is trustworthy.; sent6 -> int2: if the fact that the wake either is not a kind of a platform or is not a imperfectibility or both is not right it is not cheliferous.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the wake is not a platform and/or is not a imperfectibility is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the wake is not cheliferous.;
the houseplant is not untrustworthy.
sent25 -> int5: if the mail does not conscript wall then it is not a grits and it does denationalize metacenter.; sent24 -> int6: there is something such that that it is a kind of a platform and is cheliferous is incorrect.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: the bitch is not cheliferous.;
$hypothesis$ = the shellflower is non-ahistorical. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not denationalize metacenter if it does not grit. sent2: if the wake does denationalize metacenter then the fact that either it is not a platform or it is not a imperfectibility or both is wrong. sent3: the wake denationalizes metacenter. sent4: if that the wake does not denationalize metacenter or it is a platform or both does not hold it is not trustworthy. sent5: if something is not a bill then it is not cheliferous. sent6: if that something is not a platform and/or it is not a kind of a imperfectibility is not right then it is not cheliferous. sent7: if the spud does not denationalize metacenter then the fact that the mail is both a imperfectibility and not a platform does not hold. sent8: that the shellflower is not trustworthy and not a bill does not hold if there exists something such that it is ahistorical. sent9: the shellflower is trustworthy if the fact that it is ahistorical hold. sent10: something is not cheliferous if that it is a platform or not a imperfectibility or both is false. sent11: the wake is not cheliferous if the fact that it is a kind of a platform or it is not a imperfectibility or both is not true. sent12: The metacenter denationalizes wake. sent13: the bitch is not a bill if there is something such that that it is a imperfectibility and it is not a platform is incorrect. sent14: if the mail does not grit and denationalizes metacenter the bitch is a imperfectibility. sent15: the houseplant is trustworthy if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-trustworthy thing that does not bill is not right. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is a nonparticipant is not false then that the spud does not denationalize Yorktown and does conscript wall is wrong. sent17: if the wake does bill then it is cheliferous. sent18: the wake is ahistorical if something is a imperfectibility but not cheliferous. sent19: something is not cheliferous if the fact that it is not a platform and/or it is a imperfectibility is false. sent20: if the fact that the bitch is not trustworthy and/or is not cheliferous is true the wake is not trustworthy. sent21: the neem is a nonparticipant. sent22: if the fact that something does not denationalize Yorktown and does conscript wall is wrong then that it is not a grits is not incorrect. sent23: the bitch is not cheliferous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a platform and is cheliferous is not true. sent24: the fact that the spud is a platform and is cheliferous is false. sent25: something is not a grits but it does denationalize metacenter if it does not conscript wall. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shellflower is ahistorical.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the shellflower is trustworthy.; sent6 -> int2: if the fact that the wake either is not a kind of a platform or is not a imperfectibility or both is not right it is not cheliferous.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the wake is not a platform and/or is not a imperfectibility is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the wake is not cheliferous.; __UNKNOWN__