there exists something such that if it is a peacock-throne it does not ramble acrocarp and is a gallamine.
sent1: if the stillroom is a peacock-throne it is not pineal and it does axe Psittacus. sent2: there is something such that if it instructs talkie then it is not violable and it is neuropsychological. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a peacock-throne is not wrong it is a gallamine. sent4: there is something such that if it is a peacock-throne then that it does not ramble acrocarp is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a peacock-throne then it does ramble acrocarp and is a gallamine. sent6: the pogonion does not ramble acrocarp if it is a peacock-throne. sent7: the pogonion is not a kind of a peacock-throne and is a kind of a Bethlehem if it is balsamic. sent8: if the pogonion is a peacock-throne it does not ramble acrocarp and it is a gallamine. sent9: there is something such that if it subjects then it does not exterminate and it is a canter. sent10: if something is a hugger then it is a kind of non-irreversible thing that is a BMR.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it is a kind of a hugger is true it is not irreversible and it is a BMR.
sent10 -> int1: the Singer is not irreversible and is a BMR if that it is a hugger is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a peacock-throne it does not ramble acrocarp and is a gallamine. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stillroom is a peacock-throne it is not pineal and it does axe Psittacus. sent2: there is something such that if it instructs talkie then it is not violable and it is neuropsychological. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a peacock-throne is not wrong it is a gallamine. sent4: there is something such that if it is a peacock-throne then that it does not ramble acrocarp is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a peacock-throne then it does ramble acrocarp and is a gallamine. sent6: the pogonion does not ramble acrocarp if it is a peacock-throne. sent7: the pogonion is not a kind of a peacock-throne and is a kind of a Bethlehem if it is balsamic. sent8: if the pogonion is a peacock-throne it does not ramble acrocarp and it is a gallamine. sent9: there is something such that if it subjects then it does not exterminate and it is a canter. sent10: if something is a hugger then it is a kind of non-irreversible thing that is a BMR. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__