the fact that the nasion is not normative and it does not adjoin Agassiz is incorrect.
sent1: if the SACEUR is not monozygotic the fact that the nasion is a hood and/or it blisters is not incorrect. sent2: something does not remain if it does not adjoin Agassiz and is normative. sent3: the SACEUR does not adjoin lobbyist. sent4: the nasion does not remain if the columbine does not adjoin Agassiz. sent5: something that does remain and does not emulsify antonymy is not normative. sent6: if the SACEUR does not adjoin lobbyist it is not monozygotic. sent7: if something does not remain and it does not emulsify antonymy then it is not normative. sent8: the columbine does not adjoin Agassiz. sent9: if the SACEUR is not a bleachers then the columbine does not remain and it does not emulsify antonymy. sent10: the nasion does not emulsify antonymy and it is not a bleachers if the fact that the columbine does not adjoin Agassiz is right. sent11: the SACEUR is not a bleachers. sent12: a blister is graceful. sent13: if something is a hood it is graceful. sent14: that the SACEUR is not a bleachers and it does not remain is incorrect. sent15: that the nasion is normative but it does not adjoin Agassiz is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the nasion is not normative and it does not adjoin Agassiz is false if the columbine is not normative. sent17: a bleachers does not adjoin Agassiz and is normative. sent18: if the columbine is not normative then that the nasion is not normative but it does not adjoin Agassiz does not hold. sent19: the columbine does not remain. sent20: if the columbine does remain but it does not emulsify antonymy it is not normative. sent21: if the SACEUR is not a bleachers then that the columbine does not remain is not incorrect.
sent7 -> int1: if the columbine does not remain and does not emulsify antonymy it is not normative.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the columbine does not remain and does not emulsify antonymy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the columbine is not normative.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the cotter does not remain.
sent2 -> int4: if the cotter does not adjoin Agassiz and is normative then it does not remain.; sent17 -> int5: the cotter does not adjoin Agassiz and is normative if it is a bleachers.; sent6 & sent3 -> int6: the SACEUR is not monozygotic.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: either the nasion hoods or it does blister or both.; sent13 -> int8: if the nasion does hood then it is graceful.; sent12 -> int9: if the nasion is a blister it is graceful.; int7 & int8 & int9 -> int10: the nasion is graceful.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is graceful.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the nasion is not normative and it does not adjoin Agassiz is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the SACEUR is not monozygotic the fact that the nasion is a hood and/or it blisters is not incorrect. sent2: something does not remain if it does not adjoin Agassiz and is normative. sent3: the SACEUR does not adjoin lobbyist. sent4: the nasion does not remain if the columbine does not adjoin Agassiz. sent5: something that does remain and does not emulsify antonymy is not normative. sent6: if the SACEUR does not adjoin lobbyist it is not monozygotic. sent7: if something does not remain and it does not emulsify antonymy then it is not normative. sent8: the columbine does not adjoin Agassiz. sent9: if the SACEUR is not a bleachers then the columbine does not remain and it does not emulsify antonymy. sent10: the nasion does not emulsify antonymy and it is not a bleachers if the fact that the columbine does not adjoin Agassiz is right. sent11: the SACEUR is not a bleachers. sent12: a blister is graceful. sent13: if something is a hood it is graceful. sent14: that the SACEUR is not a bleachers and it does not remain is incorrect. sent15: that the nasion is normative but it does not adjoin Agassiz is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the nasion is not normative and it does not adjoin Agassiz is false if the columbine is not normative. sent17: a bleachers does not adjoin Agassiz and is normative. sent18: if the columbine is not normative then that the nasion is not normative but it does not adjoin Agassiz does not hold. sent19: the columbine does not remain. sent20: if the columbine does remain but it does not emulsify antonymy it is not normative. sent21: if the SACEUR is not a bleachers then that the columbine does not remain is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the columbine does not remain and does not emulsify antonymy it is not normative.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the columbine does not remain and does not emulsify antonymy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the columbine is not normative.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__