the fact that there exists something such that if it does tailgate Malay it is both not a baldric and not an aphrodisiac is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does feel then it is a kind of non-annalistic thing that is a wildfowl. sent2: there is something such that if it is not non-Jeffersonian then it does not insufflate materiel. sent3: something that is a nuisance is not a Ostwald and is not bacteriostatic. sent4: there is something such that if it is a nombril it is not dipolar. sent5: there exists something such that if it does tailgate Malay then it is not a baldric. sent6: the incest is not aphrodisiac if it does tailgate Malay. sent7: the incest is not a Cyprus and does not tailgate Malay if it is not non-whiting. sent8: there exists something such that if it is docile then it is both not a metatarsal and thrifty. sent9: there is something such that if it tailgates Malay then it is both not a baldric and aphrodisiac. sent10: the stethoscope is not a Curtiss and it does not tailgate Malay if it is bimetallistic. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it tailgates Malay is not false then it is not an aphrodisiac. sent12: there is something such that if it is a gagman it is not bimetallistic and it is not a kind of a hospitality. sent13: the incest is not a kind of a baldric and is not an aphrodisiac if it tailgates Malay. sent14: the incest is a baldric and non-aphrodisiac if that it does tailgate Malay is right. sent15: there exists something such that if it does tailgate Malay then it is a kind of a baldric and it is not aphrodisiac. sent16: there exists something such that if it does drill incest it is not a Manipur and it is not a kind of an aphid. sent17: the incest is not an aphrodisiac and it is not anemophilous if the fact that it is appealable is not wrong.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
the kiln is not a Ostwald and is not bacteriostatic if it is a nuisance.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does tailgate Malay it is both not a baldric and not an aphrodisiac is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does feel then it is a kind of non-annalistic thing that is a wildfowl. sent2: there is something such that if it is not non-Jeffersonian then it does not insufflate materiel. sent3: something that is a nuisance is not a Ostwald and is not bacteriostatic. sent4: there is something such that if it is a nombril it is not dipolar. sent5: there exists something such that if it does tailgate Malay then it is not a baldric. sent6: the incest is not aphrodisiac if it does tailgate Malay. sent7: the incest is not a Cyprus and does not tailgate Malay if it is not non-whiting. sent8: there exists something such that if it is docile then it is both not a metatarsal and thrifty. sent9: there is something such that if it tailgates Malay then it is both not a baldric and aphrodisiac. sent10: the stethoscope is not a Curtiss and it does not tailgate Malay if it is bimetallistic. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it tailgates Malay is not false then it is not an aphrodisiac. sent12: there is something such that if it is a gagman it is not bimetallistic and it is not a kind of a hospitality. sent13: the incest is not a kind of a baldric and is not an aphrodisiac if it tailgates Malay. sent14: the incest is a baldric and non-aphrodisiac if that it does tailgate Malay is right. sent15: there exists something such that if it does tailgate Malay then it is a kind of a baldric and it is not aphrodisiac. sent16: there exists something such that if it does drill incest it is not a Manipur and it is not a kind of an aphid. sent17: the incest is not an aphrodisiac and it is not anemophilous if the fact that it is appealable is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__