the pick is not auspicious.
sent1: the fact that the pick does jockey ripple but it is not a kind of a bit is incorrect. sent2: the pick is auspicious if the fact that it does not jockey ripple and it does not bite is not true. sent3: the chorister is a stake and it is a decalescence. sent4: if something is not downmarket and/or it does not jockey optimization then the fact that it is not undeniable is true. sent5: if something is not undeniable the fact that it does not jockey ripple and is not a bit does not hold. sent6: the chorister is not a decalescence if that either the pick is not downmarket or it does not jockey optimization or both is not true. sent7: the fact that something is not a jobbery and it does not consort Allhallowtide is wrong if it is not a bit. sent8: the pick is downmarket and/or it does not jockey optimization.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pick is not downmarket or it does not jockey optimization or both is not correct.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the chorister is not a kind of a decalescence.; sent3 -> int2: the chorister is a kind of a decalescence.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the pick is not downmarket and/or it does not jockey optimization.; sent4 -> int5: if the pick is not downmarket or it does not jockey optimization or both then it is not undeniable.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the pick is deniable hold.; sent5 -> int7: if the pick is not undeniable then that it does not jockey ripple and it is not a kind of a bit is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the pick does not jockey ripple and it does not bite is not true.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the FIG does not bite the fact that it is not a jobbery and does not consort Allhallowtide is wrong.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pick is not auspicious. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the pick does jockey ripple but it is not a kind of a bit is incorrect. sent2: the pick is auspicious if the fact that it does not jockey ripple and it does not bite is not true. sent3: the chorister is a stake and it is a decalescence. sent4: if something is not downmarket and/or it does not jockey optimization then the fact that it is not undeniable is true. sent5: if something is not undeniable the fact that it does not jockey ripple and is not a bit does not hold. sent6: the chorister is not a decalescence if that either the pick is not downmarket or it does not jockey optimization or both is not true. sent7: the fact that something is not a jobbery and it does not consort Allhallowtide is wrong if it is not a bit. sent8: the pick is downmarket and/or it does not jockey optimization. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pick is not downmarket or it does not jockey optimization or both is not correct.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the chorister is not a kind of a decalescence.; sent3 -> int2: the chorister is a kind of a decalescence.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the pick is not downmarket and/or it does not jockey optimization.; sent4 -> int5: if the pick is not downmarket or it does not jockey optimization or both then it is not undeniable.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the pick is deniable hold.; sent5 -> int7: if the pick is not undeniable then that it does not jockey ripple and it is not a kind of a bit is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the pick does not jockey ripple and it does not bite is not true.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__