the fact that the langoustine does not butt pipeline and is not intracranial is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the langoustine does not butt pipeline and is not a streptomycin is not correct. sent2: the fact that the langoustine does butt pipeline but it is not intracranial is not correct. sent3: something is not malarial. sent4: the roarer is a Pegasus and/or does rear cowgirl. sent5: the roarer is not a piggyback if the fact that it is a Pegasus and/or does not rear cowgirl does not hold. sent6: the void is a streptomycin. sent7: if the langoustine does not rear cowgirl the roarer is not intracranial. sent8: the void is not a kind of a streptomycin if the roarer is a Pegasus and/or does not rear cowgirl. sent9: that the langoustine does not butt pipeline and it is not intracranial is not correct if something is not a piggyback. sent10: the langoustine does not rear cowgirl if that it either is intracranial or is not a Pegasus or both is not correct. sent11: the fact that the roarer is intracranial or is dyadic or both is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roarer is a Pegasus or does not rear cowgirl or both.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the void is not a streptomycin.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the roarer is a Pegasus and/or does not rear cowgirl is wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the roarer is not a piggyback.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a piggyback.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the langoustine does not butt pipeline and is not intracranial is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the langoustine does not butt pipeline and is not a streptomycin is not correct. sent2: the fact that the langoustine does butt pipeline but it is not intracranial is not correct. sent3: something is not malarial. sent4: the roarer is a Pegasus and/or does rear cowgirl. sent5: the roarer is not a piggyback if the fact that it is a Pegasus and/or does not rear cowgirl does not hold. sent6: the void is a streptomycin. sent7: if the langoustine does not rear cowgirl the roarer is not intracranial. sent8: the void is not a kind of a streptomycin if the roarer is a Pegasus and/or does not rear cowgirl. sent9: that the langoustine does not butt pipeline and it is not intracranial is not correct if something is not a piggyback. sent10: the langoustine does not rear cowgirl if that it either is intracranial or is not a Pegasus or both is not correct. sent11: the fact that the roarer is intracranial or is dyadic or both is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roarer is a Pegasus or does not rear cowgirl or both.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the void is not a streptomycin.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the roarer is a Pegasus and/or does not rear cowgirl is wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the roarer is not a piggyback.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a piggyback.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__