the arcade is a Balsamorhiza.
sent1: if the go-getter is basal the bellyband is unrighteous. sent2: if the bellyband is a kind of a piezoelectricity then the aspartame is unrighteous. sent3: if the aspartame is not a kind of a piezoelectricity and it does not underwrite arcade then the go-getter is basal. sent4: a non-unrighteous thing is a piezoelectricity and/or does underwrite arcade. sent5: the fact that the go-getter is both not non-basal and not non-papal is false. sent6: there exists something such that it does not extend kweek. sent7: that the cliff extends kweek and it does slime bow-wow is incorrect. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is basal and it is papal is false then the cliff is not papal. sent9: the aspartame is not papal if that the cliff does extend kweek is not wrong. sent10: the cliff does not extend kweek. sent11: the fact that the cliff is not a kanchil and slimes bow-wow is false. sent12: if that the cliff does not extend kweek but it does slime bow-wow does not hold then that the aspartame is not papal is correct. sent13: the arcade is a kind of a Balsamorhiza if something that does extend kweek slimes bow-wow. sent14: the go-getter is basal if the aspartame is a piezoelectricity but it does not underwrite arcade. sent15: the fact that the bellyband is a kanchil and it is unrighteous is false. sent16: the arcade is not affixal and does not slime bow-wow. sent17: the jazzman is a Yquem. sent18: something is not unrighteous if that it is a kanchil and unrighteous does not hold. sent19: the aspartame is not unrighteous if that it is unrighteous but not a bluefish does not hold. sent20: if something does not extend kweek and slimes bow-wow the arcade is a kind of a Balsamorhiza. sent21: the bow-wow is a kanchil. sent22: the thumbnail is not absorbable and is not a piezoelectricity. sent23: if the aspartame is not a kind of a piezoelectricity and underwrites arcade the go-getter is basal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cliff does not extend kweek but it does slime bow-wow is wrong.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the aspartame is non-papal.; sent18 -> int2: the bellyband is not unrighteous if the fact that it is both a kanchil and not unrighteous does not hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the bellyband is not unrighteous is not incorrect.;
the arcade is not a Balsamorhiza.
sent5 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is basal and papal is not right.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the cliff is not papal.; sent4 -> int6: the aspartame is a piezoelectricity and/or it underwrites arcade if it is not unrighteous.;
$hypothesis$ = the arcade is a Balsamorhiza. ; $context$ = sent1: if the go-getter is basal the bellyband is unrighteous. sent2: if the bellyband is a kind of a piezoelectricity then the aspartame is unrighteous. sent3: if the aspartame is not a kind of a piezoelectricity and it does not underwrite arcade then the go-getter is basal. sent4: a non-unrighteous thing is a piezoelectricity and/or does underwrite arcade. sent5: the fact that the go-getter is both not non-basal and not non-papal is false. sent6: there exists something such that it does not extend kweek. sent7: that the cliff extends kweek and it does slime bow-wow is incorrect. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is basal and it is papal is false then the cliff is not papal. sent9: the aspartame is not papal if that the cliff does extend kweek is not wrong. sent10: the cliff does not extend kweek. sent11: the fact that the cliff is not a kanchil and slimes bow-wow is false. sent12: if that the cliff does not extend kweek but it does slime bow-wow does not hold then that the aspartame is not papal is correct. sent13: the arcade is a kind of a Balsamorhiza if something that does extend kweek slimes bow-wow. sent14: the go-getter is basal if the aspartame is a piezoelectricity but it does not underwrite arcade. sent15: the fact that the bellyband is a kanchil and it is unrighteous is false. sent16: the arcade is not affixal and does not slime bow-wow. sent17: the jazzman is a Yquem. sent18: something is not unrighteous if that it is a kanchil and unrighteous does not hold. sent19: the aspartame is not unrighteous if that it is unrighteous but not a bluefish does not hold. sent20: if something does not extend kweek and slimes bow-wow the arcade is a kind of a Balsamorhiza. sent21: the bow-wow is a kanchil. sent22: the thumbnail is not absorbable and is not a piezoelectricity. sent23: if the aspartame is not a kind of a piezoelectricity and underwrites arcade the go-getter is basal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cliff does not extend kweek but it does slime bow-wow is wrong.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the aspartame is non-papal.; sent18 -> int2: the bellyband is not unrighteous if the fact that it is both a kanchil and not unrighteous does not hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the bellyband is not unrighteous is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__