the broiling retinoblastoma occurs.
sent1: that the encephalography does not occur and the specificness does not occur is triggered by the brightness. sent2: the sustenance happens if that the riot does not occur and the voyaging occurs is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the self-defense does not occur and the sustenance does not occur is false if that the goad occurs hold. sent4: not the bedding bastion but the onomasticsness happens. sent5: if the convolution does not occur then the fact that the liquefying does not occur and the brightness does not occur is not correct. sent6: if both the specific and the encephalography happens the fabricating telepathist does not occur. sent7: if the brightness occurs the specific happens. sent8: that the fabricating telepathist does not occur and the sweetening does not occur hold. sent9: the self-defense happens if that the self-defense does not occur and the sustenance does not occur does not hold. sent10: the revoke does not occur. sent11: if the encephalography does not occur and the specificness does not occur then the fact that the fabricating telepathist happens is not incorrect. sent12: if that the liquefying does not occur and the brightness does not occur is wrong the brightness occurs. sent13: that the sweetening does not occur is brought about by that the fabricating telepathist does not occur. sent14: if the quarantining streamer occurs the broiling Petromyzontidae does not occur and the convolution does not occur. sent15: if that the fullness does not occur is not incorrect then both the electronicsness and the quarantining streamer happens. sent16: if the fabricating telepathist occurs the sweetening does not occur. sent17: if that the fabricating telepathist does not occur and the sweetening does not occur hold the sustenance does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the riot does not occur but the voyage happens is false is not incorrect.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the sustenance happens.; sent17 & sent8 -> int2: that the sustenance does not occur hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: not the rioting but the voyaging occurs.; int4 -> int5: the riot does not occur.;
the self-defense occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the broiling retinoblastoma occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the encephalography does not occur and the specificness does not occur is triggered by the brightness. sent2: the sustenance happens if that the riot does not occur and the voyaging occurs is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the self-defense does not occur and the sustenance does not occur is false if that the goad occurs hold. sent4: not the bedding bastion but the onomasticsness happens. sent5: if the convolution does not occur then the fact that the liquefying does not occur and the brightness does not occur is not correct. sent6: if both the specific and the encephalography happens the fabricating telepathist does not occur. sent7: if the brightness occurs the specific happens. sent8: that the fabricating telepathist does not occur and the sweetening does not occur hold. sent9: the self-defense happens if that the self-defense does not occur and the sustenance does not occur does not hold. sent10: the revoke does not occur. sent11: if the encephalography does not occur and the specificness does not occur then the fact that the fabricating telepathist happens is not incorrect. sent12: if that the liquefying does not occur and the brightness does not occur is wrong the brightness occurs. sent13: that the sweetening does not occur is brought about by that the fabricating telepathist does not occur. sent14: if the quarantining streamer occurs the broiling Petromyzontidae does not occur and the convolution does not occur. sent15: if that the fullness does not occur is not incorrect then both the electronicsness and the quarantining streamer happens. sent16: if the fabricating telepathist occurs the sweetening does not occur. sent17: if that the fabricating telepathist does not occur and the sweetening does not occur hold the sustenance does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the riot does not occur but the voyage happens is false is not incorrect.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the sustenance happens.; sent17 & sent8 -> int2: that the sustenance does not occur hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: not the rioting but the voyaging occurs.; int4 -> int5: the riot does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__