that the parsley is not a Plagianthus hold.
sent1: the apparatus is basilar and is a Anomalopidae. sent2: if the fact that the apparatus is basilar and a Anomalopidae hold it is not Satanic. sent3: if the ubiquinone is a kind of an antiquity and is not semiparasitic then the cutaway does fudge milkwort. sent4: the fact that the apparatus is a kind of a terpene but it is not butyric is incorrect if the ubiquinone is not a Avestan. sent5: something is a Plagianthus if it is both not a terpene and not a Avestan. sent6: that the apparatus is basilar and it fudges milkwort is wrong. sent7: if the cutaway fudges milkwort then the fact that the fact that the fact that either the aalii is not a kind of a rust or it is a nationalist or both is not incorrect is not correct is correct. sent8: the roommate is not a Horneophyton if that the fact that the aalii is not a rust and/or is a kind of a nationalist does not hold is right. sent9: if the roommate is not a Horneophyton the parsley is not a Plagianthus. sent10: if that the parsley is semiparasitic but it is not a Plagianthus is not right it is not Avestan. sent11: if something is not Satanic then it is a terpene and is not butyric. sent12: that the aalii does rust is not incorrect. sent13: the ubiquinone is not a kind of a Avestan if the fact that it is both an antiquity and not semiparasitic is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that the ubiquinone is an antiquity but it is not semiparasitic is not true is not false.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the ubiquinone is not a Avestan.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the apparatus is a terpene and not butyric is false.; sent11 -> int3: if that the apparatus is not Satanic is not incorrect then it is a kind of a terpene and it is not butyric.; sent2 & sent1 -> int4: the apparatus is not Satanic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the apparatus is a terpene but it is not butyric.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the ubiquinone is an antiquity that is non-semiparasitic.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the cutaway does fudge milkwort.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the fact that the aalii is not a kind of a rust and/or is a kind of a nationalist is not true.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the fact that the roommate is not a Horneophyton is not wrong.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the parsley is a kind of a Plagianthus.
sent5 -> int11: if the parsley is not a kind of a terpene and it is not a Avestan then that it is a Plagianthus is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the parsley is not a Plagianthus hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the apparatus is basilar and is a Anomalopidae. sent2: if the fact that the apparatus is basilar and a Anomalopidae hold it is not Satanic. sent3: if the ubiquinone is a kind of an antiquity and is not semiparasitic then the cutaway does fudge milkwort. sent4: the fact that the apparatus is a kind of a terpene but it is not butyric is incorrect if the ubiquinone is not a Avestan. sent5: something is a Plagianthus if it is both not a terpene and not a Avestan. sent6: that the apparatus is basilar and it fudges milkwort is wrong. sent7: if the cutaway fudges milkwort then the fact that the fact that the fact that either the aalii is not a kind of a rust or it is a nationalist or both is not incorrect is not correct is correct. sent8: the roommate is not a Horneophyton if that the fact that the aalii is not a rust and/or is a kind of a nationalist does not hold is right. sent9: if the roommate is not a Horneophyton the parsley is not a Plagianthus. sent10: if that the parsley is semiparasitic but it is not a Plagianthus is not right it is not Avestan. sent11: if something is not Satanic then it is a terpene and is not butyric. sent12: that the aalii does rust is not incorrect. sent13: the ubiquinone is not a kind of a Avestan if the fact that it is both an antiquity and not semiparasitic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that the ubiquinone is an antiquity but it is not semiparasitic is not true is not false.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the ubiquinone is not a Avestan.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the apparatus is a terpene and not butyric is false.; sent11 -> int3: if that the apparatus is not Satanic is not incorrect then it is a kind of a terpene and it is not butyric.; sent2 & sent1 -> int4: the apparatus is not Satanic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the apparatus is a terpene but it is not butyric.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the ubiquinone is an antiquity that is non-semiparasitic.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the cutaway does fudge milkwort.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the fact that the aalii is not a kind of a rust and/or is a kind of a nationalist is not true.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the fact that the roommate is not a Horneophyton is not wrong.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__