the Pennsylvanian is not a kind of a scorching.
sent1: if that something is a diploid hold the fact that the fact that it is a Platymiscium is incorrect hold. sent2: The Girard does not confuse backsaw. sent3: if something is either not non-diploid or acetic or both then the fact that it is not a Platymiscium hold. sent4: the backsaw does not confuse Girard. sent5: the carnation is not responsive. sent6: if that something is not a Utrillo and it is not expansive is false then it is acetic. sent7: if the carnation is not a Platymiscium the surgeonfish confuses Vermonter and is not noninheritable. sent8: the Pennsylvanian is a rabbitwood if the backsaw does not confuse Girard. sent9: the Pennsylvanian is a kind of a rabbitwood and it does confuse rasher if the backsaw does not confuse Girard. sent10: the surgeonfish is not noninheritable if the fact that the carnation is not a Platymiscium hold. sent11: that the carnation is not a Utrillo and it is not expansive is not true if it is not responsive. sent12: the Pennsylvanian pegs physiography if the surgeonfish does confuse Vermonter but it is not noninheritable. sent13: if the fact that the surgeonfish is not acetic and is a diploid is incorrect the Pennsylvanian scorches. sent14: if the carnation is not responsive that it is not a Utrillo and it is expansive is not right. sent15: that something is not acetic but diploid is incorrect if the fact that it is a Platymiscium hold. sent16: something is not noninheritable if it is a kind of non-acetic a diploid. sent17: the Pennsylvanian is a Platymiscium and is a rabbitwood if the carnation does not peg physiography. sent18: if something that pegs physiography does confuse rasher it is not a kind of a scorching. sent19: that the fact that the carnation is a kind of a Utrillo that is not expansive is not right is not false.
sent6 -> int1: the carnation is acetic if the fact that it is both not a Utrillo and not expansive does not hold.; sent11 & sent5 -> int2: that the carnation is not a kind of a Utrillo and it is not expansive is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the carnation is acetic.; int3 -> int4: the carnation is a kind of a diploid or is acetic or both.; sent3 -> int5: the carnation is not a kind of a Platymiscium if it is a diploid or it is acetic or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the carnation is not a Platymiscium.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the surgeonfish confuses Vermonter but it is not noninheritable.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the Pennsylvanian does peg physiography.; sent9 & sent4 -> int9: the Pennsylvanian is a kind of a rabbitwood and confuses rasher.; int9 -> int10: the Pennsylvanian confuses rasher.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the Pennsylvanian pegs physiography and does confuse rasher.; sent18 -> int12: if the Pennsylvanian does peg physiography and it confuses rasher it is not a kind of a scorching.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the Pennsylvanian is a scorching.
sent15 -> int13: if the surgeonfish is a Platymiscium the fact that it is not acetic but diploid is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Pennsylvanian is not a kind of a scorching. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a diploid hold the fact that the fact that it is a Platymiscium is incorrect hold. sent2: The Girard does not confuse backsaw. sent3: if something is either not non-diploid or acetic or both then the fact that it is not a Platymiscium hold. sent4: the backsaw does not confuse Girard. sent5: the carnation is not responsive. sent6: if that something is not a Utrillo and it is not expansive is false then it is acetic. sent7: if the carnation is not a Platymiscium the surgeonfish confuses Vermonter and is not noninheritable. sent8: the Pennsylvanian is a rabbitwood if the backsaw does not confuse Girard. sent9: the Pennsylvanian is a kind of a rabbitwood and it does confuse rasher if the backsaw does not confuse Girard. sent10: the surgeonfish is not noninheritable if the fact that the carnation is not a Platymiscium hold. sent11: that the carnation is not a Utrillo and it is not expansive is not true if it is not responsive. sent12: the Pennsylvanian pegs physiography if the surgeonfish does confuse Vermonter but it is not noninheritable. sent13: if the fact that the surgeonfish is not acetic and is a diploid is incorrect the Pennsylvanian scorches. sent14: if the carnation is not responsive that it is not a Utrillo and it is expansive is not right. sent15: that something is not acetic but diploid is incorrect if the fact that it is a Platymiscium hold. sent16: something is not noninheritable if it is a kind of non-acetic a diploid. sent17: the Pennsylvanian is a Platymiscium and is a rabbitwood if the carnation does not peg physiography. sent18: if something that pegs physiography does confuse rasher it is not a kind of a scorching. sent19: that the fact that the carnation is a kind of a Utrillo that is not expansive is not right is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the carnation is acetic if the fact that it is both not a Utrillo and not expansive does not hold.; sent11 & sent5 -> int2: that the carnation is not a kind of a Utrillo and it is not expansive is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the carnation is acetic.; int3 -> int4: the carnation is a kind of a diploid or is acetic or both.; sent3 -> int5: the carnation is not a kind of a Platymiscium if it is a diploid or it is acetic or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the carnation is not a Platymiscium.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the surgeonfish confuses Vermonter but it is not noninheritable.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the Pennsylvanian does peg physiography.; sent9 & sent4 -> int9: the Pennsylvanian is a kind of a rabbitwood and confuses rasher.; int9 -> int10: the Pennsylvanian confuses rasher.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the Pennsylvanian pegs physiography and does confuse rasher.; sent18 -> int12: if the Pennsylvanian does peg physiography and it confuses rasher it is not a kind of a scorching.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__