the peanut is not palatial.
sent1: that the peanut is a kind of the render that does premise peanut if the peanut is non-palatial is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that everything either rusticates or does not premise peanut or both is right. sent3: something is Eurocentric and it is diamagnetic if it is not a spat. sent4: everything does rusticate or it does premise peanut or both. sent5: something is articulated and it is palatial if it is not bellyless. sent6: the fact that the B is not the spat if the fact that the B obeys Bluegrass and it does spat is incorrect is not incorrect. sent7: something rusticates and is not bellyless if it is a kind of a Shapley. sent8: if the B is not aerobics that it obeys Bluegrass and it does spit does not hold. sent9: the ciderpress is a kind of a Shapley if the B is Eurocentric. sent10: if either something does rusticate or it does not premise peanut or both it does not premise peanut.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peanut is not palatial.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the peanut does render and premises peanut.; int1 -> int2: that the peanut premises peanut hold.; sent10 -> int3: the peanut does not premise peanut if it does rusticate and/or it does not premise peanut.; sent2 -> int4: the peanut does rusticate and/or it does not premise peanut.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the peanut does not premise peanut.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the peanut articulates and it is chromosomal.
sent5 -> int7: the peanut is articulated and it is palatial if the fact that it is not bellyless is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the peanut is not palatial. ; $context$ = sent1: that the peanut is a kind of the render that does premise peanut if the peanut is non-palatial is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that everything either rusticates or does not premise peanut or both is right. sent3: something is Eurocentric and it is diamagnetic if it is not a spat. sent4: everything does rusticate or it does premise peanut or both. sent5: something is articulated and it is palatial if it is not bellyless. sent6: the fact that the B is not the spat if the fact that the B obeys Bluegrass and it does spat is incorrect is not incorrect. sent7: something rusticates and is not bellyless if it is a kind of a Shapley. sent8: if the B is not aerobics that it obeys Bluegrass and it does spit does not hold. sent9: the ciderpress is a kind of a Shapley if the B is Eurocentric. sent10: if either something does rusticate or it does not premise peanut or both it does not premise peanut. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peanut is not palatial.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the peanut does render and premises peanut.; int1 -> int2: that the peanut premises peanut hold.; sent10 -> int3: the peanut does not premise peanut if it does rusticate and/or it does not premise peanut.; sent2 -> int4: the peanut does rusticate and/or it does not premise peanut.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the peanut does not premise peanut.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__