the Sitter is not a Murrow.
sent1: if the rill is not a policewoman but nonfat the workman is a she-oak. sent2: if the fact that something is a Murrow hold then that it is a kind of a she-oak that is not polychromatic is not right. sent3: if the workman is not a kind of a policewoman but it is a kind of a she-oak the rill is gustatory. sent4: the fact that something is sure but it is not gustatory is false if it is a kind of a she-oak. sent5: the workman is a she-oak if the Sitter is a kind of a Murrow and it is not non-gustatory. sent6: if that the workman is both sure and not gustatory is false the Sitter is not a Murrow. sent7: if the Sitter is a kind of a Murrow that it is gustatory and is not a she-oak is not true. sent8: if something is a savory that it is relative and it is not a Loki is incorrect. sent9: the fact that something is gustatory and is not nonfat is not correct if it is a kind of a she-oak. sent10: that the fact that the workman is a kind of a policewoman but it is not sure is false is right.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the workman is both not non-sure and not gustatory does not hold if it is a kind of a she-oak.;
that the cardiograph is a she-oak but it is not polychromatic is false.
sent2 -> int2: that the cardiograph is a she-oak but not polychromatic is not true if it is a Murrow.;
$hypothesis$ = the Sitter is not a Murrow. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rill is not a policewoman but nonfat the workman is a she-oak. sent2: if the fact that something is a Murrow hold then that it is a kind of a she-oak that is not polychromatic is not right. sent3: if the workman is not a kind of a policewoman but it is a kind of a she-oak the rill is gustatory. sent4: the fact that something is sure but it is not gustatory is false if it is a kind of a she-oak. sent5: the workman is a she-oak if the Sitter is a kind of a Murrow and it is not non-gustatory. sent6: if that the workman is both sure and not gustatory is false the Sitter is not a Murrow. sent7: if the Sitter is a kind of a Murrow that it is gustatory and is not a she-oak is not true. sent8: if something is a savory that it is relative and it is not a Loki is incorrect. sent9: the fact that something is gustatory and is not nonfat is not correct if it is a kind of a she-oak. sent10: that the fact that the workman is a kind of a policewoman but it is not sure is false is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the workman is both not non-sure and not gustatory does not hold if it is a kind of a she-oak.; __UNKNOWN__