the empyrealness does not occur and the risking Esocidae does not occur.
sent1: the ecarte happens. sent2: the ecarte does not occur if the empyrealness happens and the stabling blare happens. sent3: the Bhutaneseness does not occur. sent4: the stabling xerography does not occur and the mithraicness does not occur. sent5: the risking Esocidae does not occur. sent6: both the appointiveness and the stabling blare occurs.
sent6 -> int1: the stabling blare occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the empyrealness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the empyrealness happens and the stabling blare happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the ecarte does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the empyrealness does not occur is true.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the empyrealness does not occur and the risking Esocidae does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ecarte happens. sent2: the ecarte does not occur if the empyrealness happens and the stabling blare happens. sent3: the Bhutaneseness does not occur. sent4: the stabling xerography does not occur and the mithraicness does not occur. sent5: the risking Esocidae does not occur. sent6: both the appointiveness and the stabling blare occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the stabling blare occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the empyrealness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the empyrealness happens and the stabling blare happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the ecarte does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the empyrealness does not occur is true.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__