there is something such that if it does not haze arteriogram that it is both not resinlike and not a American is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the supermarket is not a kind of a rod is not incorrect that it does not tease Hathaway and it surmises goatsfoot does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does not solemnize epiphora then it is not an edge and it does not tease redcap. sent3: there is something such that if it is not unpronounceable then that it is both not a Mendelian and not a reserve does not hold. sent4: if the supermarket does not haze arteriogram the fact that it is not non-resinlike and not a American is not true. sent5: there is something such that if it does not haze arteriogram that it is a kind of resinlike thing that is not American does not hold. sent6: that the supermarket is not a boogie and not resinlike does not hold if it is not a eyelessness. sent7: the fact that the supermarket is not resinlike and it is not a American is wrong if it does not haze arteriogram. sent8: the fact that the supermarket is both not resinlike and not American is not true if it does haze arteriogram. sent9: there is something such that if it does not haze arteriogram that it is not resinlike but American is not true. sent10: that something is not a resuscitation and it does not tease pellucidness is incorrect if that it does not solemnize circlet hold. sent11: if the supermarket is not a surprise then the fact that it does not haze arteriogram and does not tease supermarket is false. sent12: the fact that the redcap is not peptic but it is a kind of a striker is incorrect if it is not resinlike.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not solemnize circlet the fact that it is not a resuscitation and it does not tease pellucidness is not right.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the arteriogram is not a resuscitation and does not tease pellucidness is not right if it does not solemnize circlet.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not haze arteriogram that it is both not resinlike and not a American is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the supermarket is not a kind of a rod is not incorrect that it does not tease Hathaway and it surmises goatsfoot does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does not solemnize epiphora then it is not an edge and it does not tease redcap. sent3: there is something such that if it is not unpronounceable then that it is both not a Mendelian and not a reserve does not hold. sent4: if the supermarket does not haze arteriogram the fact that it is not non-resinlike and not a American is not true. sent5: there is something such that if it does not haze arteriogram that it is a kind of resinlike thing that is not American does not hold. sent6: that the supermarket is not a boogie and not resinlike does not hold if it is not a eyelessness. sent7: the fact that the supermarket is not resinlike and it is not a American is wrong if it does not haze arteriogram. sent8: the fact that the supermarket is both not resinlike and not American is not true if it does haze arteriogram. sent9: there is something such that if it does not haze arteriogram that it is not resinlike but American is not true. sent10: that something is not a resuscitation and it does not tease pellucidness is incorrect if that it does not solemnize circlet hold. sent11: if the supermarket is not a surprise then the fact that it does not haze arteriogram and does not tease supermarket is false. sent12: the fact that the redcap is not peptic but it is a kind of a striker is incorrect if it is not resinlike. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__