there exists something such that it is uncousinly and diverts.
sent1: the fact that the denier does spray oppressor is true. sent2: there is something such that it is uncousinly. sent3: if something does not filigree then it repairs and it does pipe. sent4: if there is something such that it does not spray oppressor the denier does divert and is a valuation. sent5: The oppressor does not spray surtout. sent6: the denier is uncousinly if the mesohippus filigrees. sent7: if that something does not divert and it is not uncousinly is false then it is not a filigree. sent8: if the fact that the twit is not a kind of a paddle-box but it does spray pasture does not hold it is a repair. sent9: the twit is a transitive. sent10: if the twit does not spray pasture then it repairs. sent11: that something is a kind of a paddle-box is not false if it does pipe. sent12: the surtout does not spray oppressor. sent13: the mesohippus is a filigree if the arrival is a pipe. sent14: the surtout repairs. sent15: the fact that the twit is not a paddle-box but it does spray pasture is not true. sent16: if the fact that the surtout does spray oppressor is not false then it is uncousinly. sent17: the denier filigrees if the mesohippus diverts. sent18: the twit is a filigree and it does spray pasture if something is not a paddle-box. sent19: the denier is a valuation. sent20: something does spray oppressor. sent21: the twit does spray oppressor and it sprays pasture. sent22: the denier does repair and it is a valuation. sent23: there exists something such that it does divert. sent24: if the twit does divert then the denier is a paddle-box. sent25: the denier is a kind of a valuation if there is something such that it does not spray oppressor. sent26: the arrival pipes if the twit is a repair. sent27: if the arrival does spray pasture it does pipe.
sent8 & sent15 -> int1: the twit is a kind of a repair.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the arrival is a kind of a pipe.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the mesohippus does filigree.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the denier is uncousinly.; sent12 -> int5: there is something such that it does not spray oppressor.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the denier does divert and it is a valuation.; int6 -> int7: the denier does divert.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the denier is uncousinly and it diverts.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the billfish is a paddle-box.
sent11 -> int9: the billfish is a paddle-box if it is a pipe.; sent3 -> int10: the billfish is a repair and it does pipe if it does not filigree.; sent7 -> int11: the fact that the billfish is not a filigree is not wrong if the fact that it does not divert and it is not uncousinly is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is uncousinly and diverts. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the denier does spray oppressor is true. sent2: there is something such that it is uncousinly. sent3: if something does not filigree then it repairs and it does pipe. sent4: if there is something such that it does not spray oppressor the denier does divert and is a valuation. sent5: The oppressor does not spray surtout. sent6: the denier is uncousinly if the mesohippus filigrees. sent7: if that something does not divert and it is not uncousinly is false then it is not a filigree. sent8: if the fact that the twit is not a kind of a paddle-box but it does spray pasture does not hold it is a repair. sent9: the twit is a transitive. sent10: if the twit does not spray pasture then it repairs. sent11: that something is a kind of a paddle-box is not false if it does pipe. sent12: the surtout does not spray oppressor. sent13: the mesohippus is a filigree if the arrival is a pipe. sent14: the surtout repairs. sent15: the fact that the twit is not a paddle-box but it does spray pasture is not true. sent16: if the fact that the surtout does spray oppressor is not false then it is uncousinly. sent17: the denier filigrees if the mesohippus diverts. sent18: the twit is a filigree and it does spray pasture if something is not a paddle-box. sent19: the denier is a valuation. sent20: something does spray oppressor. sent21: the twit does spray oppressor and it sprays pasture. sent22: the denier does repair and it is a valuation. sent23: there exists something such that it does divert. sent24: if the twit does divert then the denier is a paddle-box. sent25: the denier is a kind of a valuation if there is something such that it does not spray oppressor. sent26: the arrival pipes if the twit is a repair. sent27: if the arrival does spray pasture it does pipe. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent15 -> int1: the twit is a kind of a repair.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the arrival is a kind of a pipe.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the mesohippus does filigree.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the denier is uncousinly.; sent12 -> int5: there is something such that it does not spray oppressor.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the denier does divert and it is a valuation.; int6 -> int7: the denier does divert.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the denier is uncousinly and it diverts.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__