that if the enamel is Caroline then the fact that the filmmaker is not a kind of a pyemia or does not snuff Antigua or both is not correct does not hold.
sent1: the histaminase is a quoin if a fatalist thing is Caroline. sent2: that the filmmaker is a kind of a pyemia and/or it does not snuff Antigua is not right. sent3: the filmmaker is not a pyemia or it does not snuff Antigua or both. sent4: if something does crush then it does right superego. sent5: if the enamel is a thalidomide then it is not non-fatalist. sent6: if the histaminase is a quoin that the filmmaker is a kind of a pyemia and/or it does not snuff Antigua does not hold. sent7: the enamel is a quoin. sent8: the filmmaker does snuff Antigua if the enamel is Caroline. sent9: that the enamel is a kind of a thalidomide is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the histaminase is not a kind of a pyemia and/or snuffs Antigua is wrong if the filmmaker is a quoin. sent11: that the filmmaker snuffs Antigua is not wrong if the histaminase is a quoin. sent12: if the histaminase is a kind of a quoin that the filmmaker is not a pyemia or it does not snuff Antigua or both is not true. sent13: the fact that the enamel is not Caroline or is not a kind of a quoin or both does not hold if the histaminase is fatalist. sent14: the filmmaker is a fatalist.
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the enamel is a fatalist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enamel is Caroline.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the enamel is a fatalist and Caroline.; int2 -> int3: something is a fatalist that is Caroline.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the histaminase is a quoin.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: that the filmmaker is not a kind of a pyemia or does not snuff Antigua or both does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the ghost rights superego if it crushes.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the enamel is Caroline then the fact that the filmmaker is not a kind of a pyemia or does not snuff Antigua or both is not correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the histaminase is a quoin if a fatalist thing is Caroline. sent2: that the filmmaker is a kind of a pyemia and/or it does not snuff Antigua is not right. sent3: the filmmaker is not a pyemia or it does not snuff Antigua or both. sent4: if something does crush then it does right superego. sent5: if the enamel is a thalidomide then it is not non-fatalist. sent6: if the histaminase is a quoin that the filmmaker is a kind of a pyemia and/or it does not snuff Antigua does not hold. sent7: the enamel is a quoin. sent8: the filmmaker does snuff Antigua if the enamel is Caroline. sent9: that the enamel is a kind of a thalidomide is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the histaminase is not a kind of a pyemia and/or snuffs Antigua is wrong if the filmmaker is a quoin. sent11: that the filmmaker snuffs Antigua is not wrong if the histaminase is a quoin. sent12: if the histaminase is a kind of a quoin that the filmmaker is not a pyemia or it does not snuff Antigua or both is not true. sent13: the fact that the enamel is not Caroline or is not a kind of a quoin or both does not hold if the histaminase is fatalist. sent14: the filmmaker is a fatalist. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the enamel is a fatalist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enamel is Caroline.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the enamel is a fatalist and Caroline.; int2 -> int3: something is a fatalist that is Caroline.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the histaminase is a quoin.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: that the filmmaker is not a kind of a pyemia or does not snuff Antigua or both does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__