the intrapulmonariness happens.
sent1: the powerlessness occurs and the joking happens. sent2: if the fact that the sailing-race does not occur is not incorrect the bottomlessness happens and the criticizing sparring occurs. sent3: if the impending happens then the wheatenness occurs. sent4: that both the sailing-race and the non-penetrableness happens does not hold if the fact that the pitting packer occurs is not incorrect. sent5: the criticizing damp happens if that the fact that the gardening does not occur and the criticizing damp does not occur is wrong is not false. sent6: the nonindulgentness happens. sent7: the criticizing damp does not occur if either the takeover does not occur or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur or both. sent8: the fact that the gardening does not occur but the criticizing damp happens is not correct. sent9: if that the conventionalness does not occur and the generousness occurs is not right then the pitting packer occurs. sent10: if the takeover does not occur the criticizing damp does not occur. sent11: the fact that the gardening does not occur and the criticizing damp does not occur is not correct. sent12: if the budgeting occurs and the powerlessness occurs the intrapulmonariness does not occur. sent13: that the takeover occurs is right. sent14: the joke occurs. sent15: that the impending occurs is right if that the takeover does not occur and/or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur is false. sent16: if the bottomlessness occurs that the feudatoriness but not the gardening happens is not correct. sent17: the fact that the powerlessness occurs and the budgeting occurs does not hold if the joke does not occur. sent18: the impending occurs if the fact that the takeover happens and/or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur is incorrect. sent19: if the fact that the sailing-race but not the penetrableness happens does not hold then the sailing-race does not occur. sent20: that the budget does not occur is prevented by the wheatenness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that either the takeover does not occur or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur or both hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the criticizing damp does not occur.; sent5 & sent11 -> int2: the criticizing damp happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the takeover does not occur or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur or both does not hold.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the impending occurs.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the wheatenness occurs.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the budget occurs.; sent1 -> int8: the powerlessness happens.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the budgeting happens and the powerlessness occurs.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the intrapulmonariness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the intrapulmonariness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the powerlessness occurs and the joking happens. sent2: if the fact that the sailing-race does not occur is not incorrect the bottomlessness happens and the criticizing sparring occurs. sent3: if the impending happens then the wheatenness occurs. sent4: that both the sailing-race and the non-penetrableness happens does not hold if the fact that the pitting packer occurs is not incorrect. sent5: the criticizing damp happens if that the fact that the gardening does not occur and the criticizing damp does not occur is wrong is not false. sent6: the nonindulgentness happens. sent7: the criticizing damp does not occur if either the takeover does not occur or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur or both. sent8: the fact that the gardening does not occur but the criticizing damp happens is not correct. sent9: if that the conventionalness does not occur and the generousness occurs is not right then the pitting packer occurs. sent10: if the takeover does not occur the criticizing damp does not occur. sent11: the fact that the gardening does not occur and the criticizing damp does not occur is not correct. sent12: if the budgeting occurs and the powerlessness occurs the intrapulmonariness does not occur. sent13: that the takeover occurs is right. sent14: the joke occurs. sent15: that the impending occurs is right if that the takeover does not occur and/or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur is false. sent16: if the bottomlessness occurs that the feudatoriness but not the gardening happens is not correct. sent17: the fact that the powerlessness occurs and the budgeting occurs does not hold if the joke does not occur. sent18: the impending occurs if the fact that the takeover happens and/or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur is incorrect. sent19: if the fact that the sailing-race but not the penetrableness happens does not hold then the sailing-race does not occur. sent20: that the budget does not occur is prevented by the wheatenness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that either the takeover does not occur or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur or both hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the criticizing damp does not occur.; sent5 & sent11 -> int2: the criticizing damp happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the takeover does not occur or the criticizing lion-hunter does not occur or both does not hold.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the impending occurs.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the wheatenness occurs.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the budget occurs.; sent1 -> int8: the powerlessness happens.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the budgeting happens and the powerlessness occurs.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__