that the inexhaustibleness but not the deafening blarney occurs does not hold.
sent1: both the changeableness and the looseness happens. sent2: the fact that the inexhaustibleness but not the deafening blarney happens does not hold if the inconspicuousness does not occur. sent3: the capturing Acheson happens and the unscrewing communication happens. sent4: if the fact that not the atomisticness but the hostility happens is incorrect the Crow does not occur. sent5: if the changeableness happens and the Crow does not occur the inconspicuousness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-atomisticness and the hostility happens.; sent3 -> int1: the capturing Acheson occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the changeableness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that the inexhaustibleness but not the deafening blarney occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: both the changeableness and the looseness happens. sent2: the fact that the inexhaustibleness but not the deafening blarney happens does not hold if the inconspicuousness does not occur. sent3: the capturing Acheson happens and the unscrewing communication happens. sent4: if the fact that not the atomisticness but the hostility happens is incorrect the Crow does not occur. sent5: if the changeableness happens and the Crow does not occur the inconspicuousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-atomisticness and the hostility happens.; sent3 -> int1: the capturing Acheson occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the changeableness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__