the fact that the bystander is a carbuncled and a Jewry is not incorrect.
sent1: if the beret is not a kind of a U then it is a kind of Newtonian thing that is nonexistent. sent2: that something does not entrust journey and it does not cleave is not right if it is a kind of a Newtonian. sent3: the Scythian is not a U if it is a Newtonian and it is nonexistent. sent4: the Scythian is nonexistent and it is not uncharacteristic if it is not a antipasto. sent5: the beret is a comeliness. sent6: the bystander is a carbuncled and is a carbine. sent7: the NSAID is a comeliness. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of a carbuncled that is a Jewry does not hold if it is not a comeliness. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a U then that the NSAID is not a Tudor and does not radio puffery is false. sent10: the fact that the Scythian does radio division and it is a antipasto is incorrect. sent11: the Scythian is a Newtonian if the chocolate cleaves. sent12: the chocolate does cleave if that the ciprofloxacin does not entrust journey is not right. sent13: the bystander is a Jewry if the fact that the NSAID is non-Tudor thing that does not radio puffery does not hold. sent14: the ciprofloxacin does entrust journey if the beret is a comeliness.
sent14 & sent5 -> int1: the ciprofloxacin entrusts journey.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the chocolate does cleave.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the Scythian is a kind of a Newtonian.; sent6 -> int4: the bystander is a carbuncled.;
the fact that the bystander is both a carbuncled and a Jewry is not correct.
sent8 -> int5: the fact that the bystander is a kind of a carbuncled and it is a Jewry does not hold if it is not a comeliness.; sent2 -> int6: if the beret is a Newtonian then that it does not entrust journey and it does not cleave is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bystander is a carbuncled and a Jewry is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the beret is not a kind of a U then it is a kind of Newtonian thing that is nonexistent. sent2: that something does not entrust journey and it does not cleave is not right if it is a kind of a Newtonian. sent3: the Scythian is not a U if it is a Newtonian and it is nonexistent. sent4: the Scythian is nonexistent and it is not uncharacteristic if it is not a antipasto. sent5: the beret is a comeliness. sent6: the bystander is a carbuncled and is a carbine. sent7: the NSAID is a comeliness. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of a carbuncled that is a Jewry does not hold if it is not a comeliness. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a U then that the NSAID is not a Tudor and does not radio puffery is false. sent10: the fact that the Scythian does radio division and it is a antipasto is incorrect. sent11: the Scythian is a Newtonian if the chocolate cleaves. sent12: the chocolate does cleave if that the ciprofloxacin does not entrust journey is not right. sent13: the bystander is a Jewry if the fact that the NSAID is non-Tudor thing that does not radio puffery does not hold. sent14: the ciprofloxacin does entrust journey if the beret is a comeliness. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent5 -> int1: the ciprofloxacin entrusts journey.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the chocolate does cleave.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the Scythian is a kind of a Newtonian.; sent6 -> int4: the bystander is a carbuncled.; __UNKNOWN__