that there exists something such that if it is not retrograde the fact that it is a abstractionism is correct is not correct.
sent1: if the bracelet is editorial then it does retrograde. sent2: the fact that if the bracelet is stereoscopic the bracelet is a abstractionism is right. sent3: there is something such that if it is not pro-life it is a Explorer. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is not a mud is true then it teases birdie. sent5: if the bracelet does not palatalize then that it is retrograde hold. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is macrencephalic is right it does unbend Cybele. sent7: the birdie is a abstractionism if it does not unbend formative. sent8: there is something such that if it does not tease Abruzzi then it is testicular. sent9: the bracelet is a kind of a abstractionism if the fact that it is retrograde is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a Vinogradoff it convoys Caxton. sent11: something is unsocial if it is not a mud. sent12: that there is something such that if it does retrograde it is a abstractionism is not false. sent13: the bracelet retrogrades if it does offer Kilimanjaro. sent14: the bracelet retrogrades if it is not a leeward. sent15: the bracelet is a abstractionism if it does retrograde.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
the stayer is unsocial if it does not mud.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not retrograde the fact that it is a abstractionism is correct is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bracelet is editorial then it does retrograde. sent2: the fact that if the bracelet is stereoscopic the bracelet is a abstractionism is right. sent3: there is something such that if it is not pro-life it is a Explorer. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is not a mud is true then it teases birdie. sent5: if the bracelet does not palatalize then that it is retrograde hold. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is macrencephalic is right it does unbend Cybele. sent7: the birdie is a abstractionism if it does not unbend formative. sent8: there is something such that if it does not tease Abruzzi then it is testicular. sent9: the bracelet is a kind of a abstractionism if the fact that it is retrograde is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a Vinogradoff it convoys Caxton. sent11: something is unsocial if it is not a mud. sent12: that there is something such that if it does retrograde it is a abstractionism is not false. sent13: the bracelet retrogrades if it does offer Kilimanjaro. sent14: the bracelet retrogrades if it is not a leeward. sent15: the bracelet is a abstractionism if it does retrograde. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__