the fact that there is something such that if it is planar that it is not a Horace and it does gesticulate is incorrect is not false.
sent1: that something is non-biosynthetic a Butler does not hold if it is an installation. sent2: something that is campanulate is not a kind of a bridal and is a overlordship. sent3: that something is calculable thing that condoles bornite is not correct if that it is emotional is not incorrect. sent4: if something is not non-planar then that it is a kind of a Horace that gesticulates is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it does act firewater that it is a kind of a ornithologist and does afford does not hold. sent6: the fact that the harrier does reckon and it is planar is not correct if it does bend Cervus. sent7: the fact that if the harrier acts coondog then the harrier does not bend bathrobe and gesticulates is true. sent8: if the harrier is planar then the fact that it is extrospective and it does bend cosmetician is false. sent9: if something does bend FET the fact that it is vestmental and it is a peripheral does not hold. sent10: the harrier is not incompressible but it does gesticulate if it is a Goya. sent11: the fact that the buttery is not a kind of an alcoholic and hums is wrong if it is Aeschylean. sent12: the harrier does not bend ballup but it is a kind of a Ornithischia if it is social.
there exists something such that if that it is an installation is not wrong then the fact that it is non-biosynthetic thing that is a kind of a Butler is not correct.
sent1 -> int1: that the flank is not biosynthetic but it is a Butler does not hold if it is a kind of an installation.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is planar that it is not a Horace and it does gesticulate is incorrect is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is non-biosynthetic a Butler does not hold if it is an installation. sent2: something that is campanulate is not a kind of a bridal and is a overlordship. sent3: that something is calculable thing that condoles bornite is not correct if that it is emotional is not incorrect. sent4: if something is not non-planar then that it is a kind of a Horace that gesticulates is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it does act firewater that it is a kind of a ornithologist and does afford does not hold. sent6: the fact that the harrier does reckon and it is planar is not correct if it does bend Cervus. sent7: the fact that if the harrier acts coondog then the harrier does not bend bathrobe and gesticulates is true. sent8: if the harrier is planar then the fact that it is extrospective and it does bend cosmetician is false. sent9: if something does bend FET the fact that it is vestmental and it is a peripheral does not hold. sent10: the harrier is not incompressible but it does gesticulate if it is a Goya. sent11: the fact that the buttery is not a kind of an alcoholic and hums is wrong if it is Aeschylean. sent12: the harrier does not bend ballup but it is a kind of a Ornithischia if it is social. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__