that the grinding does not occur if both the approving and the operationalistness occurs is wrong.
sent1: that the fact that both the styling Fornax and the non-thermodynamicsness occurs is correct is wrong if the synthesizing barnacle does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the waggery happens but the billowing does not occur is not true then the bolt does not occur. sent3: if that the styling Fornax occurs and the thermodynamicsness does not occur is not true then the grinding does not occur. sent4: the fact that the mellowing librarian and the non-inviolableness occurs does not hold. sent5: the synthesizing barnacle is prevented by that the narration occurs or that the operationalistness happens or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the approving happens and the operationalistness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the operationalistness occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the narration or the operationalistness or both happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the synthesizing barnacle does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that both the styling Fornax and the non-thermodynamicsness occurs is not correct.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the grinding does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the grinding does not occur if both the approving and the operationalistness occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that both the styling Fornax and the non-thermodynamicsness occurs is correct is wrong if the synthesizing barnacle does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the waggery happens but the billowing does not occur is not true then the bolt does not occur. sent3: if that the styling Fornax occurs and the thermodynamicsness does not occur is not true then the grinding does not occur. sent4: the fact that the mellowing librarian and the non-inviolableness occurs does not hold. sent5: the synthesizing barnacle is prevented by that the narration occurs or that the operationalistness happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the approving happens and the operationalistness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the operationalistness occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the narration or the operationalistness or both happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the synthesizing barnacle does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that both the styling Fornax and the non-thermodynamicsness occurs is not correct.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the grinding does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__