the chin is deconstructionist.
sent1: the lacrimation is earless if it is conquerable. sent2: if something schools screening then it is a ovenbird. sent3: the fact that if there is something such that it does not deserve Kroeber then the fact that the bentwood is not a wisent but it is mediated is wrong is true. sent4: if the skua does not beacon then that the chin is not a kind of a beacon but it is a kind of a continuance is incorrect. sent5: if that the Cork schools screening but it is not a continuance is wrong then the scan is a kind of a beacon. sent6: the skua is a kind of a self if the lacrimation is not a kind of a ovenbird. sent7: if the chin is a self then it is a kind of a beacon. sent8: if the fact that something is not a beacon and is a continuance is not right then that it is deconstructionist is right. sent9: a non-sepaloid thing wharfs and is not a kind of a Peramelidae. sent10: something does not wan if it is a kind of a self and does not deserve bean. sent11: if something is a kind of a Hemofil and it is a ovenbird it is not a beacon. sent12: the skua does resist pinole if the lacrimation is self. sent13: if that the bentwood is not a wisent but it mediates is not correct the pyx is mediates. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of a Fabian hold if it is a paw. sent15: there is something such that it does not deserve Kroeber. sent16: that the lacrimation is a self and/or it does not wan is not incorrect. sent17: if the lacrimation does not wan the fact that the skua resists pinole is true. sent18: if something resists pinole that it is a kind of a Hemofil is correct. sent19: the pinole does wan. sent20: the skua does school screening. sent21: The screening does school skua. sent22: that the skua does beacon hold if the chin is a Hemofil. sent23: if the fact that the chin is not a beacon but it schools screening does not hold then it does resist pinole. sent24: that the chin is not a Hemofil but it does deserve bough does not hold. sent25: the pyroxylin is a ovenbird that is not a Hemofil if the scan beacons. sent26: if something does not wan then the fact that it does school screening and is not a continuance is wrong. sent27: if the Costanoan is conquerable the Cork is a self but it does not deserve bean. sent28: something that does not mediate is not sepaloid and is not a coup. sent29: the Costanoan is conquerable if something is not a Peramelidae. sent30: if the pyroxylin is a ovenbird but not a Hemofil the lacrimation does not resist pinole.
sent18 -> int1: the skua is a kind of a Hemofil if it does resist pinole.; sent16 & sent12 & sent17 -> int2: the skua resists pinole.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the skua is a Hemofil.; sent2 -> int4: the skua is a ovenbird if it schools screening.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: that the skua is a ovenbird is not false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the skua is a Hemofil and it is a ovenbird.; sent11 -> int7: if the skua is a kind of a Hemofil that is a ovenbird then it is not a kind of a beacon.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the skua does not beacon.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the fact that the chin is not a beacon but a continuance is not correct.; sent8 -> int10: that the chin is deconstructionist hold if that it is not a beacon and it is a kind of a continuance is false.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the chin is not deconstructionist.
sent26 -> int11: if the Cork does not wan then the fact that it does school screening and it is not a kind of a continuance is not correct.; sent10 -> int12: the Cork does not wan if it is self and it does not deserve bean.; sent9 -> int13: the pyx does wharf but it is not a Peramelidae if it is not sepaloid.; sent28 -> int14: the pyx is not sepaloid and it is not a coup if it does not mediate.; sent15 & sent3 -> int15: that the bentwood is not a wisent and is mediated is wrong.; sent13 & int15 -> int16: the pyx is not mediated.; int14 & int16 -> int17: the pyx is a kind of non-sepaloid thing that is not a coup.; int17 -> int18: the pyx is not sepaloid.; int13 & int18 -> int19: the pyx wharfs and is not a Peramelidae.; int19 -> int20: the pyx is not a kind of a Peramelidae.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Peramelidae.; int21 & sent29 -> int22: the Costanoan is conquerable.; sent27 & int22 -> int23: the Cork is a kind of a self but it does not deserve bean.; int12 & int23 -> int24: the Cork does not wan.; int11 & int24 -> int25: the fact that the Cork does school screening and is not a continuance is false.; sent5 & int25 -> int26: the scan does beacon.; sent25 & int26 -> int27: the pyroxylin is a ovenbird and is not a Hemofil.; sent30 & int27 -> int28: the lacrimation does not resist pinole.; int28 -> int29: there is something such that it does not resist pinole.;
$hypothesis$ = the chin is deconstructionist. ; $context$ = sent1: the lacrimation is earless if it is conquerable. sent2: if something schools screening then it is a ovenbird. sent3: the fact that if there is something such that it does not deserve Kroeber then the fact that the bentwood is not a wisent but it is mediated is wrong is true. sent4: if the skua does not beacon then that the chin is not a kind of a beacon but it is a kind of a continuance is incorrect. sent5: if that the Cork schools screening but it is not a continuance is wrong then the scan is a kind of a beacon. sent6: the skua is a kind of a self if the lacrimation is not a kind of a ovenbird. sent7: if the chin is a self then it is a kind of a beacon. sent8: if the fact that something is not a beacon and is a continuance is not right then that it is deconstructionist is right. sent9: a non-sepaloid thing wharfs and is not a kind of a Peramelidae. sent10: something does not wan if it is a kind of a self and does not deserve bean. sent11: if something is a kind of a Hemofil and it is a ovenbird it is not a beacon. sent12: the skua does resist pinole if the lacrimation is self. sent13: if that the bentwood is not a wisent but it mediates is not correct the pyx is mediates. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of a Fabian hold if it is a paw. sent15: there is something such that it does not deserve Kroeber. sent16: that the lacrimation is a self and/or it does not wan is not incorrect. sent17: if the lacrimation does not wan the fact that the skua resists pinole is true. sent18: if something resists pinole that it is a kind of a Hemofil is correct. sent19: the pinole does wan. sent20: the skua does school screening. sent21: The screening does school skua. sent22: that the skua does beacon hold if the chin is a Hemofil. sent23: if the fact that the chin is not a beacon but it schools screening does not hold then it does resist pinole. sent24: that the chin is not a Hemofil but it does deserve bough does not hold. sent25: the pyroxylin is a ovenbird that is not a Hemofil if the scan beacons. sent26: if something does not wan then the fact that it does school screening and is not a continuance is wrong. sent27: if the Costanoan is conquerable the Cork is a self but it does not deserve bean. sent28: something that does not mediate is not sepaloid and is not a coup. sent29: the Costanoan is conquerable if something is not a Peramelidae. sent30: if the pyroxylin is a ovenbird but not a Hemofil the lacrimation does not resist pinole. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the skua is a kind of a Hemofil if it does resist pinole.; sent16 & sent12 & sent17 -> int2: the skua resists pinole.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the skua is a Hemofil.; sent2 -> int4: the skua is a ovenbird if it schools screening.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: that the skua is a ovenbird is not false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the skua is a Hemofil and it is a ovenbird.; sent11 -> int7: if the skua is a kind of a Hemofil that is a ovenbird then it is not a kind of a beacon.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the skua does not beacon.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the fact that the chin is not a beacon but a continuance is not correct.; sent8 -> int10: that the chin is deconstructionist hold if that it is not a beacon and it is a kind of a continuance is false.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__