the cautery occurs if the potentness happens.
sent1: both the flimsiness and the potentness occurs. sent2: the spanking does not occur. sent3: that the preposing Albatrellus occurs is right if that the polarography happens and the perfecting does not occur does not hold. sent4: the sabbatical and the preposing M occurs if the preposing foster-mother does not occur. sent5: the preposing Greco occurs or the abolition happens or both. sent6: that the polarography happens but the perfecting does not occur does not hold if the delineation happens. sent7: the peeping musket does not occur if the peeping musket does not occur or the cautery happens or both. sent8: that the peeping musket does not occur leads to that both the nebularness and the photostating vice-regent occurs. sent9: the photostating vice-regent occurs and/or the peeping musket occurs. sent10: the flimsiness happens. sent11: that the flimsiness happens and the potentness happens is brought about by that the photostating vice-regent does not occur. sent12: that the preposing Albatrellus does not occur is true if the peeping musket does not occur. sent13: the fact that the preposing Albatrellus happens is not right if either the photostating vice-regent happens or the peeping musket does not occur or both. sent14: that the cautery occurs is triggered by that the preposing Albatrellus does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potentness occurs.;
the nebularness occurs and/or the peeping Transcaucasia does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the cautery occurs if the potentness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the flimsiness and the potentness occurs. sent2: the spanking does not occur. sent3: that the preposing Albatrellus occurs is right if that the polarography happens and the perfecting does not occur does not hold. sent4: the sabbatical and the preposing M occurs if the preposing foster-mother does not occur. sent5: the preposing Greco occurs or the abolition happens or both. sent6: that the polarography happens but the perfecting does not occur does not hold if the delineation happens. sent7: the peeping musket does not occur if the peeping musket does not occur or the cautery happens or both. sent8: that the peeping musket does not occur leads to that both the nebularness and the photostating vice-regent occurs. sent9: the photostating vice-regent occurs and/or the peeping musket occurs. sent10: the flimsiness happens. sent11: that the flimsiness happens and the potentness happens is brought about by that the photostating vice-regent does not occur. sent12: that the preposing Albatrellus does not occur is true if the peeping musket does not occur. sent13: the fact that the preposing Albatrellus happens is not right if either the photostating vice-regent happens or the peeping musket does not occur or both. sent14: that the cautery occurs is triggered by that the preposing Albatrellus does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potentness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__