the miscount happens.
sent1: the fact that the hemolyticness happens hold. sent2: the patriarchalness happens. sent3: both the recreationalness and the immolation happens. sent4: the fact that the reactance happens is not wrong. sent5: the non-cellularness leads to the instillation. sent6: the jurisprudentialness happens. sent7: the receiving worrier and the instillation occurs if the cellularness does not occur. sent8: the meeting brisket happens. sent9: the meeting bugbear does not occur. sent10: that the meeting bugbear does not occur leads to that the vaunt occurs and the instillation occurs. sent11: if the patriarchalness does not occur then the miscount happens and the petrifying happens. sent12: that both the cellularness and the instillation happens is brought about by the non-Alaskanness. sent13: if the miscounting and the patriarchalness happens the receiving worrier does not occur. sent14: that the cellularness does not occur is true. sent15: that the seeking brassavola does not occur is prevented by the irreplaceableness. sent16: that the meeting colonialism and the representationalness occurs results in that the meeting dimer does not occur. sent17: the instillation occurs. sent18: the senatorialness occurs. sent19: that the Alaskan occurs and the premiership does not occur does not hold if the meeting bugbear occurs. sent20: if that the Alaskanness but not the premiership happens is incorrect that the Alaskanness does not occur is true. sent21: that the pharmacologicalness happens is caused by that the bobsledding does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the miscount happens.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the miscounting occurs and the patriarchalness occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the receiving worrier does not occur.; sent7 & sent14 -> int3: both the receiving worrier and the instillation occurs.; int3 -> int4: the receiving worrier happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the miscount occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the miscount happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hemolyticness happens hold. sent2: the patriarchalness happens. sent3: both the recreationalness and the immolation happens. sent4: the fact that the reactance happens is not wrong. sent5: the non-cellularness leads to the instillation. sent6: the jurisprudentialness happens. sent7: the receiving worrier and the instillation occurs if the cellularness does not occur. sent8: the meeting brisket happens. sent9: the meeting bugbear does not occur. sent10: that the meeting bugbear does not occur leads to that the vaunt occurs and the instillation occurs. sent11: if the patriarchalness does not occur then the miscount happens and the petrifying happens. sent12: that both the cellularness and the instillation happens is brought about by the non-Alaskanness. sent13: if the miscounting and the patriarchalness happens the receiving worrier does not occur. sent14: that the cellularness does not occur is true. sent15: that the seeking brassavola does not occur is prevented by the irreplaceableness. sent16: that the meeting colonialism and the representationalness occurs results in that the meeting dimer does not occur. sent17: the instillation occurs. sent18: the senatorialness occurs. sent19: that the Alaskan occurs and the premiership does not occur does not hold if the meeting bugbear occurs. sent20: if that the Alaskanness but not the premiership happens is incorrect that the Alaskanness does not occur is true. sent21: that the pharmacologicalness happens is caused by that the bobsledding does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the miscount happens.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the miscounting occurs and the patriarchalness occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the receiving worrier does not occur.; sent7 & sent14 -> int3: both the receiving worrier and the instillation occurs.; int3 -> int4: the receiving worrier happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__