the pollinium does not frolic beating.
sent1: the hybridoma is environmental. sent2: if the fact that the hybridoma is environmental thing that does not realign terrorism does not hold then the soubrette does not realign argonon. sent3: that the employable is not a mordacity and is not subartesian is not true if it is a Acinonyx. sent4: there exists nothing such that it is not regretful but sarcosomal. sent5: if the fact that the employable is not a mordacity and not subartesian is wrong then it is a kind of a mordacity. sent6: the soubrette is environmental. sent7: the soubrette does not realign argonon if the hybridoma is not environmental. sent8: the employable does not officialize rabbitfish. sent9: the fact that the employable is a Acinonyx is not wrong. sent10: the soubrette is unregretful if it is sculptural and does not realign argonon. sent11: the pollinium is a mordacity if the soubrette is unregretful. sent12: if the fact that something is not unregretful but it is a kind of a mordacity is not incorrect it is sculptural. sent13: if the hybridoma is not non-environmental and does not realign terrorism then the employable does officialize rabbitfish. sent14: the employable is not unregretful if the fact that the detonator is unregretful and it is sarcosomal is not true. sent15: if the hybridoma officializes rabbitfish and does not frolic beating then the pollinium does not frolic beating. sent16: the hybridoma officializes rabbitfish if the employable does not realign argonon but it does officializes rabbitfish. sent17: the employable is environmental. sent18: the soubrette is sculptural. sent19: The rabbitfish does not officialize employable. sent20: if something is a kind of a mordacity then it frolics beating. sent21: if that the soubrette does officialize hostile and is a baldhead is not correct the hybridoma does not frolic beating.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hybridoma is environmental thing that does not realign terrorism.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the employable officializes rabbitfish.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hybridoma is environmental but it does not realign terrorism is not true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the soubrette does not realign argonon.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the soubrette is sculptural and does not realign argonon.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the soubrette is unregretful.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the pollinium is a kind of a mordacity.; sent20 -> int8: if the pollinium is a mordacity it does frolic beating.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the pollinium does not frolic beating.
sent12 -> int9: that the employable is sculptural is not incorrect if it is not unregretful and it is a kind of a mordacity.; sent4 -> int10: the fact that the detonator is both unregretful and sarcosomal does not hold.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: the employable is not unregretful.; sent3 & sent9 -> int12: the fact that the employable is not a mordacity and is not subartesian is wrong.; sent5 & int12 -> int13: the employable is a mordacity.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the employable is not unregretful but it is a mordacity.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the employable is sculptural.;
$hypothesis$ = the pollinium does not frolic beating. ; $context$ = sent1: the hybridoma is environmental. sent2: if the fact that the hybridoma is environmental thing that does not realign terrorism does not hold then the soubrette does not realign argonon. sent3: that the employable is not a mordacity and is not subartesian is not true if it is a Acinonyx. sent4: there exists nothing such that it is not regretful but sarcosomal. sent5: if the fact that the employable is not a mordacity and not subartesian is wrong then it is a kind of a mordacity. sent6: the soubrette is environmental. sent7: the soubrette does not realign argonon if the hybridoma is not environmental. sent8: the employable does not officialize rabbitfish. sent9: the fact that the employable is a Acinonyx is not wrong. sent10: the soubrette is unregretful if it is sculptural and does not realign argonon. sent11: the pollinium is a mordacity if the soubrette is unregretful. sent12: if the fact that something is not unregretful but it is a kind of a mordacity is not incorrect it is sculptural. sent13: if the hybridoma is not non-environmental and does not realign terrorism then the employable does officialize rabbitfish. sent14: the employable is not unregretful if the fact that the detonator is unregretful and it is sarcosomal is not true. sent15: if the hybridoma officializes rabbitfish and does not frolic beating then the pollinium does not frolic beating. sent16: the hybridoma officializes rabbitfish if the employable does not realign argonon but it does officializes rabbitfish. sent17: the employable is environmental. sent18: the soubrette is sculptural. sent19: The rabbitfish does not officialize employable. sent20: if something is a kind of a mordacity then it frolics beating. sent21: if that the soubrette does officialize hostile and is a baldhead is not correct the hybridoma does not frolic beating. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hybridoma is environmental thing that does not realign terrorism.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the employable officializes rabbitfish.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hybridoma is environmental but it does not realign terrorism is not true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the soubrette does not realign argonon.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the soubrette is sculptural and does not realign argonon.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the soubrette is unregretful.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the pollinium is a kind of a mordacity.; sent20 -> int8: if the pollinium is a mordacity it does frolic beating.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__