the Uzbek swamps incompetence.
sent1: everything is Kiplingesque and not nidicolous. sent2: if that something is undrinkable thing that does not swamp incompetence is incorrect it swamp incompetence. sent3: if the peptone is insoluble then the posturer is both not overhead and not insoluble. sent4: if the Moon is not a kind of an accident and does not sample limnology then the puccoon is not a kind of an overhead. sent5: the Uzbek does not swamp incompetence if the posturer is not a kind of an overhead and it is not insoluble. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is a palmetto and is not anamnestic is not right then the Mao is not drinkable. sent7: the fact that the Uzbek is undrinkable but it does not swamp incompetence is wrong if the antacid is a palmetto. sent8: if that something is a kind of a palmetto is correct that the Moon is not anamnestic and it is not Socratic is wrong. sent9: the fact that if something is Socratic then it is anamnestic is not wrong. sent10: if the puccoon is not a kind of an overhead then the antacid is Socratic thing that is insoluble. sent11: if that the antacid does swamp incompetence and it is Socratic is wrong it is not Socratic. sent12: if something is hot then it is not a kind of an accident and does not sample limnology. sent13: if the fact that the antacid is undrinkable hold the puccoon is a palmetto. sent14: if that the Moon is not anamnestic and it is not Socratic does not hold then the peptone is insoluble. sent15: the antacid is undrinkable. sent16: if something is anamnestic it is a kind of a palmetto.
sent13 & sent15 -> int1: the puccoon is a kind of a palmetto.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a palmetto.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the Moon is non-anamnestic and it is not Socratic does not hold.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the peptone is insoluble.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the posturer is not an overhead and it is not insoluble.; sent5 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the Uzbek does swamp incompetence.
sent2 -> int6: if that the Uzbek is undrinkable but it does not swamp incompetence is false then it swamp incompetence.; sent16 -> int7: that the antacid is a palmetto is not wrong if it is anamnestic.; sent9 -> int8: if the antacid is Socratic then it is anamnestic.; sent12 -> int9: the Moon is not an accident and it does not sample limnology if that it is not non-hot is not wrong.; sent1 -> int10: the peptone is Kiplingesque thing that is not nidicolous.; int10 -> int11: something is Kiplingesque thing that is not nidicolous.;
$hypothesis$ = the Uzbek swamps incompetence. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is Kiplingesque and not nidicolous. sent2: if that something is undrinkable thing that does not swamp incompetence is incorrect it swamp incompetence. sent3: if the peptone is insoluble then the posturer is both not overhead and not insoluble. sent4: if the Moon is not a kind of an accident and does not sample limnology then the puccoon is not a kind of an overhead. sent5: the Uzbek does not swamp incompetence if the posturer is not a kind of an overhead and it is not insoluble. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is a palmetto and is not anamnestic is not right then the Mao is not drinkable. sent7: the fact that the Uzbek is undrinkable but it does not swamp incompetence is wrong if the antacid is a palmetto. sent8: if that something is a kind of a palmetto is correct that the Moon is not anamnestic and it is not Socratic is wrong. sent9: the fact that if something is Socratic then it is anamnestic is not wrong. sent10: if the puccoon is not a kind of an overhead then the antacid is Socratic thing that is insoluble. sent11: if that the antacid does swamp incompetence and it is Socratic is wrong it is not Socratic. sent12: if something is hot then it is not a kind of an accident and does not sample limnology. sent13: if the fact that the antacid is undrinkable hold the puccoon is a palmetto. sent14: if that the Moon is not anamnestic and it is not Socratic does not hold then the peptone is insoluble. sent15: the antacid is undrinkable. sent16: if something is anamnestic it is a kind of a palmetto. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent15 -> int1: the puccoon is a kind of a palmetto.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a palmetto.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the Moon is non-anamnestic and it is not Socratic does not hold.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the peptone is insoluble.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the posturer is not an overhead and it is not insoluble.; sent5 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__