the fact that the windward is both mythic and not a bodied does not hold.
sent1: if that something does outsail Cotacachi and does not body is false it is not a positivist. sent2: the economist is auxetic thing that does not outsail name. sent3: the economist does outsail Cotacachi. sent4: if the fact that the economist is a kind of positivist thing that does not decolonize eyrir is not true it is not a bodied. sent5: if that something does outsail name and is not a bodied is false then it is not mythic. sent6: if the cordite does not decolonize eyrir then that the economist decolonize eyrir but it is not geophysical does not hold. sent7: if the fact that something does decolonize eyrir but it is not geophysical is not correct it is not positivist. sent8: if the cordite is not a kind of a bodied then the fact that the windward is mythic and not a bodied is not right. sent9: if the fact that something does decolonize eyrir but it does not body is not right then it is not a positivist. sent10: if the economist is a kind of a positivist then it does not body. sent11: if something is auxetic but it does not outsail Cotacachi then it does not decolonize eyrir. sent12: that the economist does outsail name but it is not auxetic is not right. sent13: that the windward is a positivist and is a bodied is not correct. sent14: if something bodies and it does outsail name it is not geophysical. sent15: if a bodied does not outsail name then it is not auxetic. sent16: the windward does not body if that it is mythic and it does not outsail name does not hold. sent17: if something is not an easement then it is not removable. sent18: if the fact that the cordite is mythic but it does not outsail Cotacachi is incorrect then it is not geophysical. sent19: the cordite is not a bodied if the fact that it is a kind of auxetic thing that does not outsail Cotacachi does not hold. sent20: that the economist is a kind of a bodied that decolonizes eyrir is incorrect. sent21: the cordite is not inextinguishable. sent22: that the windward is mythic and does not outsail Cotacachi is wrong if the cordite is mythic. sent23: the wad is not non-positivist. sent24: if the cordite does not outsail Cotacachi the fact that the economist does outsail name but it does not outsail Cotacachi is incorrect. sent25: the windward does not scram forties.
sent11 -> int1: if the cordite is auxetic and does not outsail Cotacachi then it does not decolonize eyrir.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cordite is a kind of auxetic thing that does not outsail Cotacachi.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cordite does not decolonize eyrir.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the economist does decolonize eyrir and is non-geophysical is wrong.; sent7 -> int4: the economist is non-positivist if the fact that it does decolonize eyrir and is not geophysical is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the economist is not a kind of a positivist.;
that the windward is a kind of mythic thing that is not a bodied hold.
sent20 -> int6: there is something such that that it bodies and it does decolonize eyrir is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the windward is both mythic and not a bodied does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does outsail Cotacachi and does not body is false it is not a positivist. sent2: the economist is auxetic thing that does not outsail name. sent3: the economist does outsail Cotacachi. sent4: if the fact that the economist is a kind of positivist thing that does not decolonize eyrir is not true it is not a bodied. sent5: if that something does outsail name and is not a bodied is false then it is not mythic. sent6: if the cordite does not decolonize eyrir then that the economist decolonize eyrir but it is not geophysical does not hold. sent7: if the fact that something does decolonize eyrir but it is not geophysical is not correct it is not positivist. sent8: if the cordite is not a kind of a bodied then the fact that the windward is mythic and not a bodied is not right. sent9: if the fact that something does decolonize eyrir but it does not body is not right then it is not a positivist. sent10: if the economist is a kind of a positivist then it does not body. sent11: if something is auxetic but it does not outsail Cotacachi then it does not decolonize eyrir. sent12: that the economist does outsail name but it is not auxetic is not right. sent13: that the windward is a positivist and is a bodied is not correct. sent14: if something bodies and it does outsail name it is not geophysical. sent15: if a bodied does not outsail name then it is not auxetic. sent16: the windward does not body if that it is mythic and it does not outsail name does not hold. sent17: if something is not an easement then it is not removable. sent18: if the fact that the cordite is mythic but it does not outsail Cotacachi is incorrect then it is not geophysical. sent19: the cordite is not a bodied if the fact that it is a kind of auxetic thing that does not outsail Cotacachi does not hold. sent20: that the economist is a kind of a bodied that decolonizes eyrir is incorrect. sent21: the cordite is not inextinguishable. sent22: that the windward is mythic and does not outsail Cotacachi is wrong if the cordite is mythic. sent23: the wad is not non-positivist. sent24: if the cordite does not outsail Cotacachi the fact that the economist does outsail name but it does not outsail Cotacachi is incorrect. sent25: the windward does not scram forties. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the cordite is auxetic and does not outsail Cotacachi then it does not decolonize eyrir.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cordite is a kind of auxetic thing that does not outsail Cotacachi.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cordite does not decolonize eyrir.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the economist does decolonize eyrir and is non-geophysical is wrong.; sent7 -> int4: the economist is non-positivist if the fact that it does decolonize eyrir and is not geophysical is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the economist is not a kind of a positivist.; __UNKNOWN__