the fact that the madrilene is a snakebite is true.
sent1: there exists something such that that it does not vacate lactifuge and/or it is a poteen does not hold. sent2: the orthomyxovirus rays Euglenaceae if there exists something such that the fact that it does not vacate lactifuge and/or is not a poteen is wrong. sent3: the fact that the orthomyxovirus vacates lactifuge hold. sent4: the orthomyxovirus vacates lithography. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is not a snakebite and/or it does not ray Euglenaceae is not correct the madrilene does vacate lithography. sent6: there is something such that that it either does not vacate lithography or is not a snakebite or both is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not ray Euglenaceae and/or it does not vacate lithography is false. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that that it does not ray Euglenaceae and/or it is not a snakebite hold is not right then the madrilene is a kind of a sorbent. sent9: something does not vacate lithography or it is not a sorbent or both. sent10: the orthomyxovirus vacates barmbrack. sent11: The lithography vacates orthomyxovirus. sent12: something is a kind of a poteen. sent13: either something does not vacate lithography or it is not a kind of a snakebite or both. sent14: the madrilene does ray Euglenaceae if there is something such that that it does not vacate lithography and/or is not a snakebite is incorrect. sent15: the madrilene is a kind of a sorbent. sent16: the madrilene vacates lactifuge. sent17: if the orthomyxovirus vacates lithography and is a sorbent then the fact that the madrilene is not a kind of a snakebite is correct. sent18: there is something such that that it either does not vacate lactifuge or is not a poteen or both is not correct. sent19: something is a mustache. sent20: if the galbanum is a kind of a Romans then it does vacate lactifuge. sent21: the orthomyxovirus is a snakebite. sent22: if the orthomyxovirus rays Euglenaceae it is a sorbent.
sent18 & sent2 -> int1: that the orthomyxovirus rays Euglenaceae hold.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the orthomyxovirus is a sorbent.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the orthomyxovirus does vacate lithography and is a sorbent.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the madrilene is a snakebite.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the madrilene is a snakebite is true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it does not vacate lactifuge and/or it is a poteen does not hold. sent2: the orthomyxovirus rays Euglenaceae if there exists something such that the fact that it does not vacate lactifuge and/or is not a poteen is wrong. sent3: the fact that the orthomyxovirus vacates lactifuge hold. sent4: the orthomyxovirus vacates lithography. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is not a snakebite and/or it does not ray Euglenaceae is not correct the madrilene does vacate lithography. sent6: there is something such that that it either does not vacate lithography or is not a snakebite or both is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not ray Euglenaceae and/or it does not vacate lithography is false. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that that it does not ray Euglenaceae and/or it is not a snakebite hold is not right then the madrilene is a kind of a sorbent. sent9: something does not vacate lithography or it is not a sorbent or both. sent10: the orthomyxovirus vacates barmbrack. sent11: The lithography vacates orthomyxovirus. sent12: something is a kind of a poteen. sent13: either something does not vacate lithography or it is not a kind of a snakebite or both. sent14: the madrilene does ray Euglenaceae if there is something such that that it does not vacate lithography and/or is not a snakebite is incorrect. sent15: the madrilene is a kind of a sorbent. sent16: the madrilene vacates lactifuge. sent17: if the orthomyxovirus vacates lithography and is a sorbent then the fact that the madrilene is not a kind of a snakebite is correct. sent18: there is something such that that it either does not vacate lactifuge or is not a poteen or both is not correct. sent19: something is a mustache. sent20: if the galbanum is a kind of a Romans then it does vacate lactifuge. sent21: the orthomyxovirus is a snakebite. sent22: if the orthomyxovirus rays Euglenaceae it is a sorbent. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent2 -> int1: that the orthomyxovirus rays Euglenaceae hold.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the orthomyxovirus is a sorbent.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the orthomyxovirus does vacate lithography and is a sorbent.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__