if the hookup is Anglican then the deodorant is a kind of a psephology that does not blue Orientalism.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not blue scherzo and it is not a kind of a weekly does not hold then the hookup is not Anglican. sent2: the episode is intertribal and not a intumescence. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is non-Anglican thing that is a kind of a psephology is not correct. sent4: if the goldsmith is not a intumescence the deodorant is a psephology but it does not blue Orientalism. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-intertribal thing that is not a intumescence is not correct then the fact that the episode is not a psephology hold. sent6: if the goldsmith is not a psephology the episode is a intumescence and it blues scherzo. sent7: if the episode either is not intertribal or is not a weekly or both then the goldsmith is not a kind of a intumescence.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hookup is Anglican.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the episode does not blue scherzo and is not a weekly does not hold.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not blue scherzo and it is not a weekly does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the hookup is not Anglican.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the episode does not blue scherzo and it is not a weekly.; int4 -> int5: the episode is not a weekly.; int5 -> int6: the episode is not intertribal and/or it is not a kind of a weekly.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the goldsmith is not a intumescence.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the deodorant is a psephology but it does not blue Orientalism.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the hookup is Anglican then the deodorant is a kind of a psephology that does not blue Orientalism. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not blue scherzo and it is not a kind of a weekly does not hold then the hookup is not Anglican. sent2: the episode is intertribal and not a intumescence. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is non-Anglican thing that is a kind of a psephology is not correct. sent4: if the goldsmith is not a intumescence the deodorant is a psephology but it does not blue Orientalism. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-intertribal thing that is not a intumescence is not correct then the fact that the episode is not a psephology hold. sent6: if the goldsmith is not a psephology the episode is a intumescence and it blues scherzo. sent7: if the episode either is not intertribal or is not a weekly or both then the goldsmith is not a kind of a intumescence. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hookup is Anglican.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the episode does not blue scherzo and is not a weekly does not hold.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not blue scherzo and it is not a weekly does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the hookup is not Anglican.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the episode does not blue scherzo and it is not a weekly.; int4 -> int5: the episode is not a weekly.; int5 -> int6: the episode is not intertribal and/or it is not a kind of a weekly.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the goldsmith is not a intumescence.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the deodorant is a psephology but it does not blue Orientalism.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__