the vulnerableness happens and the jerking occurs.
sent1: the drinking thornbill occurs and the screen occurs. sent2: if the geophyticness happens the struggle and the non-pluralisticness occurs. sent3: that the Transfiguration happens is prevented by that the deletion does not occur. sent4: the discoloration and the skateboarding happens. sent5: the dissimilating happens. sent6: the fact that the Transfiguration happens is not wrong. sent7: if the pluralisticness does not occur that not the Transfiguration but the deletion occurs is false. sent8: that the geophyticness and the Romans happens is brought about by that the retroversion does not occur. sent9: if that the dripping happens or the deletion does not occur or both is false then the jerking happens. sent10: if the drip happens then the Transfiguration does not occur. sent11: the passionateness occurs if that not the Transfiguration but the jerk occurs is not right. sent12: the vulnerableness happens. sent13: if the fact that the vulnerableness does not occur is true the fact that the Transfiguration does not occur but the jerking happens is incorrect. sent14: the Transfiguration occurs if that the deletion occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dripping occurs or the deletion does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the Transfiguration does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the drip occurs and/or the deletion does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the jerk happens.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the passionateness happens and the drinking neolith occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the vulnerableness happens and the jerking occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the drinking thornbill occurs and the screen occurs. sent2: if the geophyticness happens the struggle and the non-pluralisticness occurs. sent3: that the Transfiguration happens is prevented by that the deletion does not occur. sent4: the discoloration and the skateboarding happens. sent5: the dissimilating happens. sent6: the fact that the Transfiguration happens is not wrong. sent7: if the pluralisticness does not occur that not the Transfiguration but the deletion occurs is false. sent8: that the geophyticness and the Romans happens is brought about by that the retroversion does not occur. sent9: if that the dripping happens or the deletion does not occur or both is false then the jerking happens. sent10: if the drip happens then the Transfiguration does not occur. sent11: the passionateness occurs if that not the Transfiguration but the jerk occurs is not right. sent12: the vulnerableness happens. sent13: if the fact that the vulnerableness does not occur is true the fact that the Transfiguration does not occur but the jerking happens is incorrect. sent14: the Transfiguration occurs if that the deletion occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dripping occurs or the deletion does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the Transfiguration does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the drip occurs and/or the deletion does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the jerk happens.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__