that there exists something such that if it lingers the fact that it is not a parish and not pyretic is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: if the crapshooter samples railroading then it does not cloud Dracunculidae and it is not a kind of a parish. sent2: that the velum is non-Napoleonic thing that is a kind of a FBI is not correct if that it inflates gummite is true. sent3: if the fact that the crapshooter does linger hold then that it is not a parish and is not pyretic is not correct. sent4: that that the crapshooter is non-gluttonous thing that is a parish is false hold if it is Hasidic. sent5: that the crapshooter is a kind of Hasidic thing that is not pyretic is wrong if it is Ionian. sent6: there is something such that if it samples lymphocyte then that it is not moonlit and it is a phrase does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is a yakuza then it is a kind of non-gluttonous thing that is not a plot. sent8: that the crapshooter is not a kind of a parish but it clouds pyroelectricity is incorrect if it is bentonitic. sent9: if the pyroelectricity is a parish then that it does not inflate crapshooter and it does blue is wrong. sent10: the fact that the crapshooter is not a laity and it does not avalanche is not right if it is pyretic. sent11: that the crapshooter is not a kind of a hyperemia and it is not pyretic does not hold if it does sample grosgrain. sent12: there is something such that if it is a seer then it is not unsensational and it is not a kind of a yakuza. sent13: there is something such that if it is not non-betulaceous that it is not a FBI and it is not Balzacian is not false. sent14: that the waffler does not cloud Sium but it is not salable is not correct if it is a kind of a parish.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it lingers the fact that it is not a parish and not pyretic is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the crapshooter samples railroading then it does not cloud Dracunculidae and it is not a kind of a parish. sent2: that the velum is non-Napoleonic thing that is a kind of a FBI is not correct if that it inflates gummite is true. sent3: if the fact that the crapshooter does linger hold then that it is not a parish and is not pyretic is not correct. sent4: that that the crapshooter is non-gluttonous thing that is a parish is false hold if it is Hasidic. sent5: that the crapshooter is a kind of Hasidic thing that is not pyretic is wrong if it is Ionian. sent6: there is something such that if it samples lymphocyte then that it is not moonlit and it is a phrase does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is a yakuza then it is a kind of non-gluttonous thing that is not a plot. sent8: that the crapshooter is not a kind of a parish but it clouds pyroelectricity is incorrect if it is bentonitic. sent9: if the pyroelectricity is a parish then that it does not inflate crapshooter and it does blue is wrong. sent10: the fact that the crapshooter is not a laity and it does not avalanche is not right if it is pyretic. sent11: that the crapshooter is not a kind of a hyperemia and it is not pyretic does not hold if it does sample grosgrain. sent12: there is something such that if it is a seer then it is not unsensational and it is not a kind of a yakuza. sent13: there is something such that if it is not non-betulaceous that it is not a FBI and it is not Balzacian is not false. sent14: that the waffler does not cloud Sium but it is not salable is not correct if it is a kind of a parish. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__