the fact that if the edging laver does not occur the lobbing flecainide but not the paradigmaticness happens is wrong.
sent1: the injection does not occur if both the allylicness and the dedication happens. sent2: if the injection does not occur both the retention and the run-through happens. sent3: the fact that the fingering does not occur and the edging forlornness does not occur is not right. sent4: if the fact that the piffling but not the lobbing flecainide occurs does not hold then the piffling does not occur. sent5: the Salvadoranness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the piffling but not the lobbing flecainide happens is not true if the edging laver occurs. sent7: the enrichment does not occur. sent8: if the edging laver happens the lobbing flecainide occurs but the paradigmaticness does not occur. sent9: the lobbing bathtub and/or the viticulture occurs. sent10: if the fact that the piffling does not occur is not wrong the lobbing caring and the non-Voltarianness happens. sent11: the ableism occurs or the Slavonicness happens or both if the fact that the digitizing cashed does not occur is true. sent12: the edging packaged happens. sent13: the paradigmaticness does not occur if the viticulture does not occur. sent14: the digitizing cashed does not occur if the fact that the avenue does not occur and the digitizing cashed happens is wrong. sent15: that the lobbing flecainide does not occur and the edging laver does not occur is false. sent16: if the edging packaged occurs either the lobbing bathtub occurs or the viticulture does not occur or both. sent17: the edging packaged does not occur but the viticulture happens if the ravelling happens. sent18: if the retention happens that the avenue does not occur but the digitizing cashed occurs is false. sent19: the allylicness and the dedication happens. sent20: if the lobbing combustibility does not occur then the anonymousness happens but the corvee does not occur. sent21: that the lobbing bathtub occurs or that the viticulture happens or both is brought about by that the edging packaged happens. sent22: that not the lobbing flecainide but the edging laver happens is not right. sent23: if the lobbing bathtub occurs and/or the viticulture does not occur then the paradigmaticness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lobbing flecainide does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the edging laver does not occur.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the lobbing flecainide does not occur and the edging laver does not occur.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the lobbing flecainide occurs.; sent16 & sent12 -> int4: the lobbing bathtub happens or the viticulture does not occur or both.; sent23 & int4 -> int5: the paradigmaticness does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the lobbing flecainide but not the paradigmaticness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the piffling does not occur.
sent1 & sent19 -> int7: the injection does not occur.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the retention and the run-through occurs.; int8 -> int9: the retention occurs.; sent18 & int9 -> int10: that the avenue does not occur but the digitizing cashed happens is not true.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: the digitizing cashed does not occur.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: the ableism occurs or the Slavonicness happens or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the edging laver does not occur the lobbing flecainide but not the paradigmaticness happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the injection does not occur if both the allylicness and the dedication happens. sent2: if the injection does not occur both the retention and the run-through happens. sent3: the fact that the fingering does not occur and the edging forlornness does not occur is not right. sent4: if the fact that the piffling but not the lobbing flecainide occurs does not hold then the piffling does not occur. sent5: the Salvadoranness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the piffling but not the lobbing flecainide happens is not true if the edging laver occurs. sent7: the enrichment does not occur. sent8: if the edging laver happens the lobbing flecainide occurs but the paradigmaticness does not occur. sent9: the lobbing bathtub and/or the viticulture occurs. sent10: if the fact that the piffling does not occur is not wrong the lobbing caring and the non-Voltarianness happens. sent11: the ableism occurs or the Slavonicness happens or both if the fact that the digitizing cashed does not occur is true. sent12: the edging packaged happens. sent13: the paradigmaticness does not occur if the viticulture does not occur. sent14: the digitizing cashed does not occur if the fact that the avenue does not occur and the digitizing cashed happens is wrong. sent15: that the lobbing flecainide does not occur and the edging laver does not occur is false. sent16: if the edging packaged occurs either the lobbing bathtub occurs or the viticulture does not occur or both. sent17: the edging packaged does not occur but the viticulture happens if the ravelling happens. sent18: if the retention happens that the avenue does not occur but the digitizing cashed occurs is false. sent19: the allylicness and the dedication happens. sent20: if the lobbing combustibility does not occur then the anonymousness happens but the corvee does not occur. sent21: that the lobbing bathtub occurs or that the viticulture happens or both is brought about by that the edging packaged happens. sent22: that not the lobbing flecainide but the edging laver happens is not right. sent23: if the lobbing bathtub occurs and/or the viticulture does not occur then the paradigmaticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lobbing flecainide does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the edging laver does not occur.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the lobbing flecainide does not occur and the edging laver does not occur.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the lobbing flecainide occurs.; sent16 & sent12 -> int4: the lobbing bathtub happens or the viticulture does not occur or both.; sent23 & int4 -> int5: the paradigmaticness does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the lobbing flecainide but not the paradigmaticness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__