the remote is less but it is not epiphytic.
sent1: if that the phycobilin is a spall is right then the ceratopsian does govern. sent2: the remote rewards paynim. sent3: the fact that the ceratopsian governs hold if the phycobilin does governs. sent4: the split does not slag contraception if the cohune does not rummage drifting but it does slag contraception. sent5: the phycobilin is a spall and/or it does govern if there is something such that it does govern. sent6: if something is not sarcolemmic then it governs and does reward rhythm. sent7: if the fact that the split does not slag contraception hold the formaldehyde is either not acaulescent or a meniscectomy or both. sent8: that if there exists something such that the fact that it is a meniscectomy is correct the bark is epiphytic and rewards paynim is not false. sent9: if the sideroblast is less the remote is less. sent10: something is not an acetylene and not a septectomy if it pegs manservant. sent11: the fact that something is epiphytic thing that is less does not hold if it is not a meniscectomy. sent12: if something either is not acaulescent or is a kind of a meniscectomy or both it is a meniscectomy. sent13: the remote is not non-less. sent14: something that is not an acetylene does not rummage drifting and slags contraception. sent15: something does peg manservant if it governs. sent16: if the ceratopsian is not an acetylene and is not a septectomy then that the cohune is an acetylene is not true. sent17: if the fact that the paynim is not a confrontation but sarcolemmic does not hold the platitudinarian is not sarcolemmic. sent18: everything rewards paynim. sent19: that the paynim is both not a confrontation and sarcolemmic is incorrect. sent20: if the sideroblast is less the remote is both less and not epiphytic. sent21: the remote is less and it does reward paynim.
the fact that the remote is less but it is not epiphytic does not hold.
sent12 -> int1: if the formaldehyde is non-acaulescent or is a meniscectomy or both it is a kind of a meniscectomy.; sent14 -> int2: if the cohune is not an acetylene it does not rummage drifting and does slag contraception.; sent10 -> int3: if the ceratopsian does peg manservant then it is not a kind of an acetylene and is not a septectomy.; sent15 -> int4: if the ceratopsian does govern the fact that it pegs manservant is not false.; sent6 -> int5: if the platitudinarian is not sarcolemmic then it governs and it does reward rhythm.; sent17 & sent19 -> int6: that the platitudinarian is not sarcolemmic is true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the platitudinarian does govern and does reward rhythm is right.; int7 -> int8: the platitudinarian does govern.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does govern.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the phycobilin is a spall and/or does govern.; int10 & sent1 & sent3 -> int11: the ceratopsian does govern.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the ceratopsian does peg manservant.; int3 & int12 -> int13: the ceratopsian is not an acetylene and it is not a kind of a septectomy.; sent16 & int13 -> int14: the cohune is not an acetylene.; int2 & int14 -> int15: the cohune does not rummage drifting and slags contraception.; sent4 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the split does not slag contraception is true.; sent7 & int16 -> int17: the formaldehyde is not acaulescent and/or is a meniscectomy.; int1 & int17 -> int18: the formaldehyde is a meniscectomy.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it is a meniscectomy.; int19 & sent8 -> int20: the bark is epiphytic and does reward paynim.; int20 -> int21: the bark is epiphytic.; int21 -> int22: there is something such that it is epiphytic.;
$hypothesis$ = the remote is less but it is not epiphytic. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the phycobilin is a spall is right then the ceratopsian does govern. sent2: the remote rewards paynim. sent3: the fact that the ceratopsian governs hold if the phycobilin does governs. sent4: the split does not slag contraception if the cohune does not rummage drifting but it does slag contraception. sent5: the phycobilin is a spall and/or it does govern if there is something such that it does govern. sent6: if something is not sarcolemmic then it governs and does reward rhythm. sent7: if the fact that the split does not slag contraception hold the formaldehyde is either not acaulescent or a meniscectomy or both. sent8: that if there exists something such that the fact that it is a meniscectomy is correct the bark is epiphytic and rewards paynim is not false. sent9: if the sideroblast is less the remote is less. sent10: something is not an acetylene and not a septectomy if it pegs manservant. sent11: the fact that something is epiphytic thing that is less does not hold if it is not a meniscectomy. sent12: if something either is not acaulescent or is a kind of a meniscectomy or both it is a meniscectomy. sent13: the remote is not non-less. sent14: something that is not an acetylene does not rummage drifting and slags contraception. sent15: something does peg manservant if it governs. sent16: if the ceratopsian is not an acetylene and is not a septectomy then that the cohune is an acetylene is not true. sent17: if the fact that the paynim is not a confrontation but sarcolemmic does not hold the platitudinarian is not sarcolemmic. sent18: everything rewards paynim. sent19: that the paynim is both not a confrontation and sarcolemmic is incorrect. sent20: if the sideroblast is less the remote is both less and not epiphytic. sent21: the remote is less and it does reward paynim. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__