the fact that there is something such that if it is a lekvar then the fact that it is not a cabal and it is a officialese is wrong is correct.
sent1: that the scaremonger is a kind of non-robotics thing that is a dobra is false if it is a officialese. sent2: if the scaremonger is a lekvar then it is both not a cabal and a officialese. sent3: if the scaremonger is valedictory that it does not stifle murderee and is a earache is not right. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a L-dopa is not incorrect the fact that it is not a kind of a persimmon and is a Philistine is not right. sent5: that if the Marks is the lekvar then that the Marks is non-ready-made thing that does jeer is incorrect is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of non-reducible thing that does plop is not true if it is a kind of a nay. sent7: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a lekvar is right that it is both a cabal and a officialese is wrong. sent8: if the scaremonger is a lekvar then that it is both a cabal and a officialese is not right. sent9: if the scaremonger is a lekvar the fact that it is not a kind of a cabal and it is a kind of a officialese does not hold. sent10: if the scaremonger does render heliotherapy that it is not light and it is scopal is false. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a barroom that it is nonvolatile thing that is a blancmange does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a lekvar then it is both not a cabal and a officialese. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a contrarian that it is not a barroom and does render resonator is not right.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is a nay then that the fact that it is not reducible and it is a plop hold is not correct.
sent6 -> int1: that if the Teller is a kind of the nay the fact that the Teller is both not reducible and a plop does not hold is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a lekvar then the fact that it is not a cabal and it is a officialese is wrong is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the scaremonger is a kind of non-robotics thing that is a dobra is false if it is a officialese. sent2: if the scaremonger is a lekvar then it is both not a cabal and a officialese. sent3: if the scaremonger is valedictory that it does not stifle murderee and is a earache is not right. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a L-dopa is not incorrect the fact that it is not a kind of a persimmon and is a Philistine is not right. sent5: that if the Marks is the lekvar then that the Marks is non-ready-made thing that does jeer is incorrect is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of non-reducible thing that does plop is not true if it is a kind of a nay. sent7: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a lekvar is right that it is both a cabal and a officialese is wrong. sent8: if the scaremonger is a lekvar then that it is both a cabal and a officialese is not right. sent9: if the scaremonger is a lekvar the fact that it is not a kind of a cabal and it is a kind of a officialese does not hold. sent10: if the scaremonger does render heliotherapy that it is not light and it is scopal is false. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a barroom that it is nonvolatile thing that is a blancmange does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a lekvar then it is both not a cabal and a officialese. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a contrarian that it is not a barroom and does render resonator is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__