the succession is not funerary.
sent1: something does add and is not a kind of a pomelo if it is not a kind of a ranger. sent2: if the succession is traditional but it is not a kind of a bohemian it negotiates cassowary. sent3: if something is a phrase and it does negotiate cassowary then that it is funerary is not false. sent4: something is not funerary if that it is not a phrase and is auspicious is not false. sent5: if that the succession is both not inauspicious and not funerary is not right then the implantation is funerary. sent6: if the fact that something is not a kind of a phrase and does not negotiate cassowary does not hold then it is a phrase. sent7: the succession does not negotiate cassowary if there is something such that it is not auspicious. sent8: the fact that the succession is auspicious but it is not funerary is incorrect if the drinking does phrase. sent9: there is something such that it is auspicious. sent10: the succession does not negotiate cassowary. sent11: if something is a phrase that does not negotiate cassowary it is funerary. sent12: that something is not a phrase and it does not negotiate cassowary is false if it is bohemian. sent13: there is something such that that it is not auspicious hold. sent14: if the succession is a phrase and does negotiate cassowary then that it is funerary is not incorrect. sent15: if there is something such that it is not auspicious then the succession is a phrase but it does not negotiate cassowary.
sent13 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the succession does phrase and does not negotiate cassowary is not wrong.; sent11 -> int2: the succession is funerary if it is a phrase and does not negotiate cassowary.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the implantation is funerary.
sent6 -> int3: the drinking is a kind of a phrase if that it does not phrase and does not negotiate cassowary is wrong.; sent12 -> int4: the fact that the drinking is not a kind of a phrase and does not negotiate cassowary does not hold if that it is a bohemian is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: if the succorer is not a ranger then it adds and it is not a pomelo.;
$hypothesis$ = the succession is not funerary. ; $context$ = sent1: something does add and is not a kind of a pomelo if it is not a kind of a ranger. sent2: if the succession is traditional but it is not a kind of a bohemian it negotiates cassowary. sent3: if something is a phrase and it does negotiate cassowary then that it is funerary is not false. sent4: something is not funerary if that it is not a phrase and is auspicious is not false. sent5: if that the succession is both not inauspicious and not funerary is not right then the implantation is funerary. sent6: if the fact that something is not a kind of a phrase and does not negotiate cassowary does not hold then it is a phrase. sent7: the succession does not negotiate cassowary if there is something such that it is not auspicious. sent8: the fact that the succession is auspicious but it is not funerary is incorrect if the drinking does phrase. sent9: there is something such that it is auspicious. sent10: the succession does not negotiate cassowary. sent11: if something is a phrase that does not negotiate cassowary it is funerary. sent12: that something is not a phrase and it does not negotiate cassowary is false if it is bohemian. sent13: there is something such that that it is not auspicious hold. sent14: if the succession is a phrase and does negotiate cassowary then that it is funerary is not incorrect. sent15: if there is something such that it is not auspicious then the succession is a phrase but it does not negotiate cassowary. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the succession does phrase and does not negotiate cassowary is not wrong.; sent11 -> int2: the succession is funerary if it is a phrase and does not negotiate cassowary.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__