the cape is inequitable.
sent1: something that does not trouble Zion stills abutter and does reset lobbyism. sent2: there exists something such that it does not still abutter. sent3: if there is something such that it does not reset CPU that the cape is not a narc and not a rutile is wrong. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that it is a jumper is true. sent5: that the CPU is not a seam and it does not reset phone is wrong. sent6: the fact that the strainer is not a drawee and does not reset CPU does not hold. sent7: something is inequitable if it does still abutter. sent8: the phone is not irrelevant. sent9: if the ceftriaxone is catoptrics then it does not reset circumnavigation. sent10: if there is something such that it is not perceptual the fact that that the cape does not still obiism and it does not reset strainer is wrong is not wrong. sent11: the fact that the collectivist is not a supplication and does not reset CPU does not hold. sent12: if that the cape is not expressible and it is not a goldenrod is incorrect then it is not inequitable. sent13: that if the heptane is non-catalatic that the heptane is not a kind of a Hmong and does not still collectivist is not true is not false. sent14: something is not inequitable if the fact that it is not irrelevant and it does not reset CPU is false. sent15: if something is a kind of a goldenrod it is not a Kaochlor. sent16: the fact that the cape is a kind of non-irrelevant thing that does not reset CPU is not true if there is something such that it does not still abutter. sent17: that the cape does not reset poverty but it is a kind of a venom is incorrect if there is something such that it does not still consolidation.
sent14 -> int1: if that the fact that the cape is not irrelevant and it does not reset CPU is true is not right it is not inequitable.; sent2 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the cape is not irrelevant and it does not reset CPU hold does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the cape is inequitable.
sent7 -> int3: if the cape does still abutter it is inequitable.; sent1 -> int4: if the cape does not trouble Zion then it does still abutter and resets lobbyism.;
$hypothesis$ = the cape is inequitable. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not trouble Zion stills abutter and does reset lobbyism. sent2: there exists something such that it does not still abutter. sent3: if there is something such that it does not reset CPU that the cape is not a narc and not a rutile is wrong. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that it is a jumper is true. sent5: that the CPU is not a seam and it does not reset phone is wrong. sent6: the fact that the strainer is not a drawee and does not reset CPU does not hold. sent7: something is inequitable if it does still abutter. sent8: the phone is not irrelevant. sent9: if the ceftriaxone is catoptrics then it does not reset circumnavigation. sent10: if there is something such that it is not perceptual the fact that that the cape does not still obiism and it does not reset strainer is wrong is not wrong. sent11: the fact that the collectivist is not a supplication and does not reset CPU does not hold. sent12: if that the cape is not expressible and it is not a goldenrod is incorrect then it is not inequitable. sent13: that if the heptane is non-catalatic that the heptane is not a kind of a Hmong and does not still collectivist is not true is not false. sent14: something is not inequitable if the fact that it is not irrelevant and it does not reset CPU is false. sent15: if something is a kind of a goldenrod it is not a Kaochlor. sent16: the fact that the cape is a kind of non-irrelevant thing that does not reset CPU is not true if there is something such that it does not still abutter. sent17: that the cape does not reset poverty but it is a kind of a venom is incorrect if there is something such that it does not still consolidation. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if that the fact that the cape is not irrelevant and it does not reset CPU is true is not right it is not inequitable.; sent2 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the cape is not irrelevant and it does not reset CPU hold does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__