the tarwood is not a masochist.
sent1: the fact that the valine is theosophical but it is not extracellular does not hold if the ligament is a kind of a Skinnerian. sent2: the dilator is not a backsword if the ligament does not escort and is an entomologist. sent3: if something that is a backsword is a Skinnerian it is not a kind of a masochist. sent4: if the tentorium is not a Latin then the fact that the Bluegrass is not a kind of a suet and does not gelatinize does not hold. sent5: that the ligament is not an escort but it is an entomologist is wrong. sent6: the Bluegrass is not a kind of a Skinnerian if the ligament is a suet. sent7: the tarwood is a Latin and it is a backsword if the ligament does not gelatinize. sent8: if the ligament does not escort and is not an entomologist then the dilator is not a backsword. sent9: the dilator is a backsword and is hieratic. sent10: if the Bluegrass is a kind of a suet then the tarwood is a kind of a masochist. sent11: that the Bluegrass is a suet but it does not gelatinize is false. sent12: the ligament is not a kind of an entomologist. sent13: if that the valine is theosophical and is not extracellular is not correct the tentorium is not a kind of a Latin. sent14: something is a kind of a Skinnerian if that it is not a kind of an escort and is not an entomologist is not right. sent15: that the tarwood is a masochist hold if the fact that that the Bluegrass is not a suet and does not gelatinize does not hold is not wrong. sent16: something is not a suet. sent17: the dilator is a hieratic. sent18: that the ligament does not gelatinize is right if there is something such that it is not a suet.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ligament is not an escort and not an entomologist.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the dilator is not a backsword.; sent9 -> int2: the dilator is a backsword.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the ligament is not an escort and is not an entomologist does not hold.; sent14 -> int5: the ligament is a kind of a Skinnerian if that the fact that it is not an escort and it is not an entomologist is not false does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ligament is a Skinnerian.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the valine is both theosophical and not extracellular does not hold.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the tentorium is not a Latin.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: that the Bluegrass is not a suet and it does not gelatinize does not hold.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the tarwood is not a masochist.
sent3 -> int10: if the tarwood is a backsword and it is a Skinnerian it is not a masochist.; sent16 & sent18 -> int11: the ligament does not gelatinize.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the tarwood is a Latin and is a backsword.; int12 -> int13: the tarwood is a backsword.;
$hypothesis$ = the tarwood is not a masochist. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the valine is theosophical but it is not extracellular does not hold if the ligament is a kind of a Skinnerian. sent2: the dilator is not a backsword if the ligament does not escort and is an entomologist. sent3: if something that is a backsword is a Skinnerian it is not a kind of a masochist. sent4: if the tentorium is not a Latin then the fact that the Bluegrass is not a kind of a suet and does not gelatinize does not hold. sent5: that the ligament is not an escort but it is an entomologist is wrong. sent6: the Bluegrass is not a kind of a Skinnerian if the ligament is a suet. sent7: the tarwood is a Latin and it is a backsword if the ligament does not gelatinize. sent8: if the ligament does not escort and is not an entomologist then the dilator is not a backsword. sent9: the dilator is a backsword and is hieratic. sent10: if the Bluegrass is a kind of a suet then the tarwood is a kind of a masochist. sent11: that the Bluegrass is a suet but it does not gelatinize is false. sent12: the ligament is not a kind of an entomologist. sent13: if that the valine is theosophical and is not extracellular is not correct the tentorium is not a kind of a Latin. sent14: something is a kind of a Skinnerian if that it is not a kind of an escort and is not an entomologist is not right. sent15: that the tarwood is a masochist hold if the fact that that the Bluegrass is not a suet and does not gelatinize does not hold is not wrong. sent16: something is not a suet. sent17: the dilator is a hieratic. sent18: that the ligament does not gelatinize is right if there is something such that it is not a suet. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ligament is not an escort and not an entomologist.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the dilator is not a backsword.; sent9 -> int2: the dilator is a backsword.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the ligament is not an escort and is not an entomologist does not hold.; sent14 -> int5: the ligament is a kind of a Skinnerian if that the fact that it is not an escort and it is not an entomologist is not false does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ligament is a Skinnerian.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the valine is both theosophical and not extracellular does not hold.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the tentorium is not a Latin.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: that the Bluegrass is not a suet and it does not gelatinize does not hold.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__