that if the bulbarness does not occur then either the DC happens or the embowering foster-son happens or both is not correct.
sent1: that the crustoseness does not occur and the drawing does not occur causes that the embowering two-timer does not occur. sent2: if the radioimmunoassay does not occur that the bulbarness occurs and the exhilarating stabilization does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the bulbarness happens but the radioimmunoassay does not occur brings about that the DC occurs. sent4: if the fact that the slicing happens but the Polish does not occur does not hold the timing occurs. sent5: the hopefulness and/or the corticalness happens if the Hawaiian does not occur. sent6: the arbitrativeness happens. sent7: the radioimmunoassay happens. sent8: the Polish and the non-crustoseness occurs. sent9: the periodonticness occurs. sent10: if that the bulbarness occurs and the radioimmunoassay does not occur does not hold then the DC happens. sent11: that the coloration occurs and the vigesimalness happens does not hold. sent12: that the embowering foster-son does not occur but the DC happens is not correct if the embowering two-timer does not occur. sent13: the fact that the bulbarness and the radioimmunoassay occurs is incorrect. sent14: that the DC occurs or the embowering foster-son or both is brought about by the bulbarness. sent15: the exhilarating stabilization happens if that the bulbarness occurs and the exhilarating stabilization does not occur does not hold. sent16: that the salat does not occur yields that the exhilarating Haydn happens and/or the arbitrativeness occurs. sent17: the ushering trunk does not occur. sent18: that the coloration happens and the ushering invertase does not occur is not right. sent19: the abstemiousness and/or the sedition is brought about by that the augmentation happens. sent20: the fact that the eldership but not the bootlegging occurs is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bulbarness but not the radioimmunoassay occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bulbarness occurs is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bulbarness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the bulbarness but not the radioimmunoassay happens does not hold.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the DC occurs.; int4 -> int5: either the DC occurs or the embowering foster-son occurs or both.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the exhilarating stabilization happens.
sent8 -> int6: the crustoseness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the bulbarness does not occur then either the DC happens or the embowering foster-son happens or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the crustoseness does not occur and the drawing does not occur causes that the embowering two-timer does not occur. sent2: if the radioimmunoassay does not occur that the bulbarness occurs and the exhilarating stabilization does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the bulbarness happens but the radioimmunoassay does not occur brings about that the DC occurs. sent4: if the fact that the slicing happens but the Polish does not occur does not hold the timing occurs. sent5: the hopefulness and/or the corticalness happens if the Hawaiian does not occur. sent6: the arbitrativeness happens. sent7: the radioimmunoassay happens. sent8: the Polish and the non-crustoseness occurs. sent9: the periodonticness occurs. sent10: if that the bulbarness occurs and the radioimmunoassay does not occur does not hold then the DC happens. sent11: that the coloration occurs and the vigesimalness happens does not hold. sent12: that the embowering foster-son does not occur but the DC happens is not correct if the embowering two-timer does not occur. sent13: the fact that the bulbarness and the radioimmunoassay occurs is incorrect. sent14: that the DC occurs or the embowering foster-son or both is brought about by the bulbarness. sent15: the exhilarating stabilization happens if that the bulbarness occurs and the exhilarating stabilization does not occur does not hold. sent16: that the salat does not occur yields that the exhilarating Haydn happens and/or the arbitrativeness occurs. sent17: the ushering trunk does not occur. sent18: that the coloration happens and the ushering invertase does not occur is not right. sent19: the abstemiousness and/or the sedition is brought about by that the augmentation happens. sent20: the fact that the eldership but not the bootlegging occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bulbarness but not the radioimmunoassay occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bulbarness occurs is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bulbarness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the bulbarness but not the radioimmunoassay happens does not hold.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the DC occurs.; int4 -> int5: either the DC occurs or the embowering foster-son occurs or both.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__