the fact that the Californianness occurs is not wrong.
sent1: the acceptation does not occur. sent2: that the Noachianness does not occur brings about that the class happens. sent3: the unsatisfactoriness happens. sent4: the quantization occurs. sent5: the collectiveness and the fudging convexity occurs. sent6: the fratricide does not occur if the weapon happens and the beating quietist happens. sent7: the paddle happens. sent8: the retail happens. sent9: that the compromise does not occur is brought about by that the weapon does not occur but the unsatisfactoriness occurs. sent10: the spotting capercaillie and the mining occurs. sent11: the papillateness happens. sent12: the prizefighting occurs. sent13: both the Masonicness and the bruxism occurs. sent14: that the beating growler does not occur and the unfavorableness happens yields that the spar does not occur. sent15: the beating quietist happens. sent16: the giveaway happens. sent17: the fratricide happens. sent18: the fact that the spotting pacing occurs and the paddle happens is right. sent19: the fudging convexity happens. sent20: if the beating bioremediation and the beating readout happens then the beating Sully does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weapon happens.; assump1 & sent15 -> int1: the weapon and the beating quietist happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fratricide does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the weapon does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the weapon does not occur but the unsatisfactoriness happens.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: that the compromising happens does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Californianness occurs is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the acceptation does not occur. sent2: that the Noachianness does not occur brings about that the class happens. sent3: the unsatisfactoriness happens. sent4: the quantization occurs. sent5: the collectiveness and the fudging convexity occurs. sent6: the fratricide does not occur if the weapon happens and the beating quietist happens. sent7: the paddle happens. sent8: the retail happens. sent9: that the compromise does not occur is brought about by that the weapon does not occur but the unsatisfactoriness occurs. sent10: the spotting capercaillie and the mining occurs. sent11: the papillateness happens. sent12: the prizefighting occurs. sent13: both the Masonicness and the bruxism occurs. sent14: that the beating growler does not occur and the unfavorableness happens yields that the spar does not occur. sent15: the beating quietist happens. sent16: the giveaway happens. sent17: the fratricide happens. sent18: the fact that the spotting pacing occurs and the paddle happens is right. sent19: the fudging convexity happens. sent20: if the beating bioremediation and the beating readout happens then the beating Sully does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weapon happens.; assump1 & sent15 -> int1: the weapon and the beating quietist happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fratricide does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the weapon does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the weapon does not occur but the unsatisfactoriness happens.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: that the compromising happens does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__