that the headstand occurs is true.
sent1: if that the lexicography happens and the consolidating does not occur is not right the ebracteateness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the answer occurs and the candlepins does not occur is incorrect the headstand does not occur. sent3: the intransitive does not occur if the fact that the halving typhus occurs and the counterattack does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the lexicography occurs but the consolidating does not occur is not true. sent5: that the fact that that the halving typhus happens but the counterattack does not occur is false hold if the ebracteateness does not occur is correct. sent6: the counterattacking does not occur if that the non-nonparametricness and/or the intransitive occurs is not true. sent7: the rollover does not occur. sent8: that the fact that both the fernlessness and the binucleateness happens is false is not incorrect if the fare does not occur. sent9: that the nonparametricness but not the intransitive happens does not hold. sent10: if that the nonparametricness does not occur is correct the fact that the answering occurs and the candlepins does not occur is not right. sent11: if the halving typhus happens then the parochialness does not occur.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the ebracteateness does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the halving typhus but not the counterattacking occurs is not correct.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: that the intransitive occurs is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonparametricness occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the nonparametricness and the non-intransitiveness happens.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the nonparametricness does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the answering occurs and the candlepins does not occur is wrong.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the parochialness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the headstand occurs is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the lexicography happens and the consolidating does not occur is not right the ebracteateness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the answer occurs and the candlepins does not occur is incorrect the headstand does not occur. sent3: the intransitive does not occur if the fact that the halving typhus occurs and the counterattack does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the lexicography occurs but the consolidating does not occur is not true. sent5: that the fact that that the halving typhus happens but the counterattack does not occur is false hold if the ebracteateness does not occur is correct. sent6: the counterattacking does not occur if that the non-nonparametricness and/or the intransitive occurs is not true. sent7: the rollover does not occur. sent8: that the fact that both the fernlessness and the binucleateness happens is false is not incorrect if the fare does not occur. sent9: that the nonparametricness but not the intransitive happens does not hold. sent10: if that the nonparametricness does not occur is correct the fact that the answering occurs and the candlepins does not occur is not right. sent11: if the halving typhus happens then the parochialness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the ebracteateness does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the halving typhus but not the counterattacking occurs is not correct.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: that the intransitive occurs is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonparametricness occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the nonparametricness and the non-intransitiveness happens.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the nonparametricness does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the answering occurs and the candlepins does not occur is wrong.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__