the blasphemer is mealy.
sent1: if the fact that the Adams paganizes is right then the Rambouillet paganizes. sent2: the blasphemer is not nonadhesive and is non-unidirectional. sent3: if something is not a uvula then it either paganizes or is unidirectional or both. sent4: if the closet is not a uvula the Rambouillet is not a kind of a moa. sent5: something is not a raven and is mealy. sent6: that the Adams does not raven is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a moa and it does not paganize. sent7: if the fact that the Rambouillet does not paganize and/or it is not unidirectional is wrong then it is not a uvula. sent8: if the Adams is not a raven then the blasphemer is not mealy. sent9: something is not electromechanical and it does not jet closet. sent10: the fact that the Rambouillet is not mealy is true. sent11: that the Rambouillet does not paganize and/or it is not unidirectional does not hold if it is not fat. sent12: if something is a kind of a fat that does not paganize it is mealy. sent13: the blasphemer is not a moa if the Rambouillet is a moa but not fat. sent14: something is not a uvula if it is not a kind of a raven and is mealy. sent15: the Adams does not raven if the fact that it is not mealy and/or it is not unidirectional does not hold. sent16: if the Rambouillet is not a uvula then the Adams does not raven. sent17: if something that is mealy is not a kind of a uvula then the blasphemer is not unidirectional. sent18: if the Rambouillet is not a raven then the fact that it is not a fat and/or it does not paganize does not hold. sent19: the Rambouillet is not fat if something that is not a kind of a moa does not redeploy blasphemer. sent20: the Adams is not unidirectional. sent21: that the Adams is not a kind of a principle is right if that it is not a kind of a uvula and/or is not androgenetic is not true. sent22: the closet is not a moa and does not redeploy blasphemer.
sent22 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a moa and it does not redeploy blasphemer.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the Rambouillet is not fat is correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the Rambouillet does not paganize or is not unidirectional or both is wrong.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the Rambouillet is not a uvula.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the Adams is not a kind of a raven.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the blasphemer is mealy is correct.
sent12 -> int6: if the blasphemer is not nonfat and does not paganize then it is mealy.;
$hypothesis$ = the blasphemer is mealy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Adams paganizes is right then the Rambouillet paganizes. sent2: the blasphemer is not nonadhesive and is non-unidirectional. sent3: if something is not a uvula then it either paganizes or is unidirectional or both. sent4: if the closet is not a uvula the Rambouillet is not a kind of a moa. sent5: something is not a raven and is mealy. sent6: that the Adams does not raven is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a moa and it does not paganize. sent7: if the fact that the Rambouillet does not paganize and/or it is not unidirectional is wrong then it is not a uvula. sent8: if the Adams is not a raven then the blasphemer is not mealy. sent9: something is not electromechanical and it does not jet closet. sent10: the fact that the Rambouillet is not mealy is true. sent11: that the Rambouillet does not paganize and/or it is not unidirectional does not hold if it is not fat. sent12: if something is a kind of a fat that does not paganize it is mealy. sent13: the blasphemer is not a moa if the Rambouillet is a moa but not fat. sent14: something is not a uvula if it is not a kind of a raven and is mealy. sent15: the Adams does not raven if the fact that it is not mealy and/or it is not unidirectional does not hold. sent16: if the Rambouillet is not a uvula then the Adams does not raven. sent17: if something that is mealy is not a kind of a uvula then the blasphemer is not unidirectional. sent18: if the Rambouillet is not a raven then the fact that it is not a fat and/or it does not paganize does not hold. sent19: the Rambouillet is not fat if something that is not a kind of a moa does not redeploy blasphemer. sent20: the Adams is not unidirectional. sent21: that the Adams is not a kind of a principle is right if that it is not a kind of a uvula and/or is not androgenetic is not true. sent22: the closet is not a moa and does not redeploy blasphemer. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a moa and it does not redeploy blasphemer.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the Rambouillet is not fat is correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the Rambouillet does not paganize or is not unidirectional or both is wrong.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the Rambouillet is not a uvula.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the Adams is not a kind of a raven.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__