if the erythroidness does not occur then that the snicking renter does not occur and/or the anecdote does not occur is not true.
sent1: the snicking renter occurs and/or the anecdote does not occur. sent2: if the snicking renter does not occur the erythroidness happens. sent3: the erythroidness occurs if the snicking renter does not occur or the anecdote happens or both. sent4: that the Frenching MANPAD does not occur or the imbibing does not occur or both is not true. sent5: that the proofreading happens hold if the updraft does not occur. sent6: that the air-to-airness does not occur or the fingerlessness does not occur or both prevents that the evasion does not occur. sent7: that the countermand does not occur or the acinarness happens or both hold. sent8: if the erythroidness does not occur then either the snicking renter does not occur or the anecdote does not occur or both. sent9: the anecdote does not occur. sent10: that the post happens is brought about by that the proliferating mash does not occur. sent11: the non-air-to-airness and/or the eosinophilicness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the snicking renter does not occur and/or the anecdote does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = if the erythroidness does not occur then that the snicking renter does not occur and/or the anecdote does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the snicking renter occurs and/or the anecdote does not occur. sent2: if the snicking renter does not occur the erythroidness happens. sent3: the erythroidness occurs if the snicking renter does not occur or the anecdote happens or both. sent4: that the Frenching MANPAD does not occur or the imbibing does not occur or both is not true. sent5: that the proofreading happens hold if the updraft does not occur. sent6: that the air-to-airness does not occur or the fingerlessness does not occur or both prevents that the evasion does not occur. sent7: that the countermand does not occur or the acinarness happens or both hold. sent8: if the erythroidness does not occur then either the snicking renter does not occur or the anecdote does not occur or both. sent9: the anecdote does not occur. sent10: that the post happens is brought about by that the proliferating mash does not occur. sent11: the non-air-to-airness and/or the eosinophilicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the snicking renter does not occur and/or the anecdote does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__