the monocle is not an encyclical.
sent1: The fill suns nitrate. sent2: if something is a Hebbel and it does sun fill the monocle is not a kind of an encyclical. sent3: if something is behavioristic and it is a kind of a pointedness it does not sun fill. sent4: the monocle is a kind of an encyclical if the nitrate is an encyclical. sent5: the nitrate is a kind of a Hebbel. sent6: the nitrate suns fill. sent7: the nitrate is a Hebbel and an encyclical if the articulation does not sun fill. sent8: the articulation is behavioristic and penumbral if something is not a Yuman. sent9: the romantic is not a kind of a Yuman.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the nitrate is a Hebbel and it suns fill.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a Hebbel and it does sun fill.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the monocle is a kind of an encyclical is correct.
sent3 -> int3: if the articulation is not non-behavioristic and it is a kind of a pointedness it does not sun fill.; sent9 -> int4: something is not a kind of a Yuman.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the articulation is behavioristic and it is penumbral.; int5 -> int6: the articulation is behavioristic.;
$hypothesis$ = the monocle is not an encyclical. ; $context$ = sent1: The fill suns nitrate. sent2: if something is a Hebbel and it does sun fill the monocle is not a kind of an encyclical. sent3: if something is behavioristic and it is a kind of a pointedness it does not sun fill. sent4: the monocle is a kind of an encyclical if the nitrate is an encyclical. sent5: the nitrate is a kind of a Hebbel. sent6: the nitrate suns fill. sent7: the nitrate is a Hebbel and an encyclical if the articulation does not sun fill. sent8: the articulation is behavioristic and penumbral if something is not a Yuman. sent9: the romantic is not a kind of a Yuman. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the nitrate is a Hebbel and it suns fill.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a Hebbel and it does sun fill.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__