the non-daciticness yields that both the practice and the dulling happens.
sent1: the practice happens if the fact that either the Waterloo does not occur or the sequestration occurs or both is incorrect. sent2: the dulling does not occur and the practice does not occur if the thermometry does not occur. sent3: that the Waterloo does not occur or the sequestration happens or both is wrong if the daciticness does not occur. sent4: if the Zimbabweanness does not occur then the cardiographicness and the deducing dimer happens. sent5: the megaloblasticness does not occur. sent6: if that the checkmating aphasia and/or the musculoskeletalness occurs does not hold the stomatalness happens. sent7: the expatiation occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the daciticness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that either the Waterloo does not occur or the sequestration occurs or both does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the practicing occurs.;
the deducing tenter happens.
$hypothesis$ = the non-daciticness yields that both the practice and the dulling happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the practice happens if the fact that either the Waterloo does not occur or the sequestration occurs or both is incorrect. sent2: the dulling does not occur and the practice does not occur if the thermometry does not occur. sent3: that the Waterloo does not occur or the sequestration happens or both is wrong if the daciticness does not occur. sent4: if the Zimbabweanness does not occur then the cardiographicness and the deducing dimer happens. sent5: the megaloblasticness does not occur. sent6: if that the checkmating aphasia and/or the musculoskeletalness occurs does not hold the stomatalness happens. sent7: the expatiation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the daciticness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that either the Waterloo does not occur or the sequestration occurs or both does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the practicing occurs.; __UNKNOWN__