the shingler is a sedulity.
sent1: the opepe is not urban. sent2: the shingler is not an ebb. sent3: the shingler is not a toupeed if that it is a couscous and it is not urban is not correct. sent4: the seaborgium is urban. sent5: if that the shingler is a tablet but it is not a sedulity does not hold then it is not a palfrey. sent6: the shingler is a kind of a palfrey and it is urban. sent7: the shingler is urban. sent8: the fact that the biont is a sedulity is not incorrect. sent9: the shingler is a bisexual. sent10: the transposon is a tablet. sent11: something is not femoral or it is a palfrey or both if it is urban. sent12: the columbo is a sedulity. sent13: if the shingler is not a tablet then it is not a kind of a palfrey. sent14: if the Levant is a polyfoam then the fact that it is actual or it is non-painful or both is incorrect. sent15: the tunic is not painful if that the Levant is actual and/or is not painful is not right. sent16: that the shingler recasts kingship is not incorrect. sent17: the shingler is a kind of a tablet. sent18: the fact that the shingler is both epic and not revocable is not correct. sent19: the tunic is urban if it is not painful. sent20: the fact that the shingler is a tablet but it is not a bugged is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the shingler is a tablet but it is not a sedulity is wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the shingler is not a palfrey.; sent6 -> int2: the shingler is a kind of a palfrey.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shingler is a kind of a tablet but it is not a kind of a sedulity.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the shingler is non-femoral.
sent11 -> int5: if the tunic is urban then it is not femoral and/or is a palfrey.;
$hypothesis$ = the shingler is a sedulity. ; $context$ = sent1: the opepe is not urban. sent2: the shingler is not an ebb. sent3: the shingler is not a toupeed if that it is a couscous and it is not urban is not correct. sent4: the seaborgium is urban. sent5: if that the shingler is a tablet but it is not a sedulity does not hold then it is not a palfrey. sent6: the shingler is a kind of a palfrey and it is urban. sent7: the shingler is urban. sent8: the fact that the biont is a sedulity is not incorrect. sent9: the shingler is a bisexual. sent10: the transposon is a tablet. sent11: something is not femoral or it is a palfrey or both if it is urban. sent12: the columbo is a sedulity. sent13: if the shingler is not a tablet then it is not a kind of a palfrey. sent14: if the Levant is a polyfoam then the fact that it is actual or it is non-painful or both is incorrect. sent15: the tunic is not painful if that the Levant is actual and/or is not painful is not right. sent16: that the shingler recasts kingship is not incorrect. sent17: the shingler is a kind of a tablet. sent18: the fact that the shingler is both epic and not revocable is not correct. sent19: the tunic is urban if it is not painful. sent20: the fact that the shingler is a tablet but it is not a bugged is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the shingler is a tablet but it is not a sedulity is wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the shingler is not a palfrey.; sent6 -> int2: the shingler is a kind of a palfrey.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shingler is a kind of a tablet but it is not a kind of a sedulity.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__