the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not personify WAN is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a watercourse and does interlock scyphus does not hold is wrong.
sent1: if the moderator does personify gripe then the fact that it is a kind of non-postwar thing that does condense does not hold. sent2: if the moderator does personify WAN then that it is not a watercourse and it does interlock scyphus does not hold. sent3: the fact that something is not a software but it interlocks Liston does not hold if it does not jumble Orthotomus. sent4: there is something such that if it does not personify WAN the fact that it is a watercourse that interlocks scyphus is not true. sent5: the fact that the cattleman does not personify luger and personifies WAN is not right if that it is not phrasal is correct. sent6: if the moderator is not orthotropous that it is not fraternal and it does believe is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it personifies WAN that it is not a watercourse and interlocks scyphus does not hold. sent8: if the moderator does not personify WAN then it is not a watercourse and does interlock scyphus. sent9: that the moderator is a watercourse and it interlocks scyphus is incorrect if it does not personify WAN. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not geminate then the fact that it does not skank and it is a kind of a Newtonian is not right. sent11: the fact that that something is both not despotic and not non-sexual is not wrong is not true if it is not medieval. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not personify WAN it is not a watercourse and interlocks scyphus. sent13: that something is not a kind of a transference but it is not non-pleochroic does not hold if it is not a ringside. sent14: if the cattleman does not interlock derivative then the fact that it does not interlock scyphus and it is an object is not true. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not resentful then the fact that it is non-orthotropous thing that personifies monogyny is not correct. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not resentful it does not personify monogyny and is semi-tuberous. sent17: if the moderator does not personify WAN the fact that it is not a watercourse and it does interlock scyphus does not hold.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not medieval then that it is both not despotic and sexual does not hold.
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the louver is not despotic but it is sexual does not hold if it is not medieval.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not personify WAN is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a watercourse and does interlock scyphus does not hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the moderator does personify gripe then the fact that it is a kind of non-postwar thing that does condense does not hold. sent2: if the moderator does personify WAN then that it is not a watercourse and it does interlock scyphus does not hold. sent3: the fact that something is not a software but it interlocks Liston does not hold if it does not jumble Orthotomus. sent4: there is something such that if it does not personify WAN the fact that it is a watercourse that interlocks scyphus is not true. sent5: the fact that the cattleman does not personify luger and personifies WAN is not right if that it is not phrasal is correct. sent6: if the moderator is not orthotropous that it is not fraternal and it does believe is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it personifies WAN that it is not a watercourse and interlocks scyphus does not hold. sent8: if the moderator does not personify WAN then it is not a watercourse and does interlock scyphus. sent9: that the moderator is a watercourse and it interlocks scyphus is incorrect if it does not personify WAN. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not geminate then the fact that it does not skank and it is a kind of a Newtonian is not right. sent11: the fact that that something is both not despotic and not non-sexual is not wrong is not true if it is not medieval. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not personify WAN it is not a watercourse and interlocks scyphus. sent13: that something is not a kind of a transference but it is not non-pleochroic does not hold if it is not a ringside. sent14: if the cattleman does not interlock derivative then the fact that it does not interlock scyphus and it is an object is not true. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not resentful then the fact that it is non-orthotropous thing that personifies monogyny is not correct. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not resentful it does not personify monogyny and is semi-tuberous. sent17: if the moderator does not personify WAN the fact that it is not a watercourse and it does interlock scyphus does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__