the fact that the fact that the fact that the fallboard does exacerbate enclave and it drains Lubeck is not false is not right hold.
sent1: something does exacerbate enclave if it does discard hyena. sent2: if the charlock is a catalog then the fact that the fallboard is not unripe and discards hyena is incorrect. sent3: the hyena does drain Lubeck. sent4: if that something is not unripe and it does not discard hyena is incorrect then the fact that it does exacerbate enclave hold. sent5: the fallboard discards referendum and overwhelms tuberose. sent6: if something does discard referendum then the coke is a catalog. sent7: the fact that the fallboard is a catalog that is a kind of a moved is correct if it does not discard referendum. sent8: the coke does vociferate and tools. sent9: the fact that the fallboard is not unripe and does discard hyena is wrong. sent10: the charlock does drain Lubeck. sent11: that something does not discard hyena and is unripe is not right if it is a catalog. sent12: the fallboard exacerbates enclave if it does discard hyena. sent13: if the charlock is a kind of a catalog then the fact that the fallboard is non-unripe thing that does not discard hyena does not hold. sent14: something does not vociferate if the fact that it is a tool and it does not discard hyena is incorrect. sent15: if the fallboard does not exacerbate enclave the coke does not drain Lubeck or is not a tool or both. sent16: the fact that the coke is the moved if the coke is neurophysiological hold. sent17: the fact that the fallboard does drain Lubeck is right if the coke vociferates. sent18: the coke is a tool. sent19: if that something does not discard hyena and is unripe does not hold then it does not exacerbate enclave. sent20: that something does discard referendum is not false. sent21: that the fact that the fallboard does not drain Lubeck and it is not a kind of a tool is not true hold if the coke vociferates. sent22: the fact that something does exacerbate enclave and it drains Lubeck is false if it does not vociferate. sent23: the coke is neurophysiological. sent24: the charlock is a kind of a catalog.
sent8 -> int1: the coke vociferates.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fallboard does drain Lubeck.; sent4 -> int3: if that the fallboard is not unripe and it does not discard hyena is not correct it exacerbates enclave.; sent13 & sent24 -> int4: the fact that the fallboard is not unripe and does not discard hyena is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fallboard exacerbates enclave.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the podzol does vociferate.
sent19 -> int6: if the fact that the fallboard does not discard hyena and is unripe is not correct it does not exacerbate enclave.; sent11 -> int7: the fact that the fallboard does not discard hyena and is unripe is not correct if that it is not a catalog is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the fact that the fallboard does exacerbate enclave and it drains Lubeck is not false is not right hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does exacerbate enclave if it does discard hyena. sent2: if the charlock is a catalog then the fact that the fallboard is not unripe and discards hyena is incorrect. sent3: the hyena does drain Lubeck. sent4: if that something is not unripe and it does not discard hyena is incorrect then the fact that it does exacerbate enclave hold. sent5: the fallboard discards referendum and overwhelms tuberose. sent6: if something does discard referendum then the coke is a catalog. sent7: the fact that the fallboard is a catalog that is a kind of a moved is correct if it does not discard referendum. sent8: the coke does vociferate and tools. sent9: the fact that the fallboard is not unripe and does discard hyena is wrong. sent10: the charlock does drain Lubeck. sent11: that something does not discard hyena and is unripe is not right if it is a catalog. sent12: the fallboard exacerbates enclave if it does discard hyena. sent13: if the charlock is a kind of a catalog then the fact that the fallboard is non-unripe thing that does not discard hyena does not hold. sent14: something does not vociferate if the fact that it is a tool and it does not discard hyena is incorrect. sent15: if the fallboard does not exacerbate enclave the coke does not drain Lubeck or is not a tool or both. sent16: the fact that the coke is the moved if the coke is neurophysiological hold. sent17: the fact that the fallboard does drain Lubeck is right if the coke vociferates. sent18: the coke is a tool. sent19: if that something does not discard hyena and is unripe does not hold then it does not exacerbate enclave. sent20: that something does discard referendum is not false. sent21: that the fact that the fallboard does not drain Lubeck and it is not a kind of a tool is not true hold if the coke vociferates. sent22: the fact that something does exacerbate enclave and it drains Lubeck is false if it does not vociferate. sent23: the coke is neurophysiological. sent24: the charlock is a kind of a catalog. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the coke vociferates.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fallboard does drain Lubeck.; sent4 -> int3: if that the fallboard is not unripe and it does not discard hyena is not correct it exacerbates enclave.; sent13 & sent24 -> int4: the fact that the fallboard is not unripe and does not discard hyena is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fallboard exacerbates enclave.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__