the heteroeciousness happens and the staging occurs.
sent1: if that the proportionateness does not occur and the leaning creepy-crawlies does not occur is not right then the duster does not occur. sent2: if the psychiatricness does not occur then the regenerateness does not occur but the chordalness occurs. sent3: the leaning sluicing happens and/or the genitalness occurs. sent4: that both the non-Achaeanness and the non-unopposableness occurs is triggered by that the neurosurgery occurs. sent5: if the Achaeanness does not occur then the fact that the meow happens and the conjunctness occurs is not right. sent6: if the leaning sluicing occurs then the costiveness happens. sent7: the Iraqi is caused by that the spluttering occurs. sent8: that the repoting jigger does not occur results in that the heteroeciousness happens. sent9: not the psychiatricness but the blinding perfecter occurs. sent10: the disassociating and the conjunctness occurs. sent11: that the Iraqi occurs is brought about by that the interpenetration occurs. sent12: if that the Iraqi happens hold the floundering does not occur or the elegantness does not occur or both. sent13: if the regenerateness does not occur that the proportionateness does not occur and the leaning creepy-crawlies does not occur does not hold. sent14: if the duster does not occur the interpenetration happens and/or the spluttering occurs. sent15: the repoting jigger and the disassociating occurs if the conjunctness does not occur. sent16: the costiveness occurs if the genitalness happens. sent17: the fact that the staging occurs hold. sent18: if that both the meowing and the conjunctness occurs is false then the conjunctness does not occur. sent19: if the leaning sluicing does not occur then that the heteroeciousness occurs and the staging happens is not right. sent20: the conjunctness occurs. sent21: that the disassociating does not occur is caused by that the costiveness and the repoting jigger happens.
sent3 & sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the costiveness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the repoting jigger occurs is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the costiveness and the repoting jigger happens.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the disassociating does not occur.; sent10 -> int4: the disassociating happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the repoting jigger does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the heteroeciousness happens.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
that the heteroeciousness occurs and the staging happens is not true.
sent9 -> int8: the psychiatricness does not occur.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the unregenerateness and the chordalness happens.; int9 -> int10: the regenerating does not occur.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the proportionateness does not occur and the leaning creepy-crawlies does not occur is not correct.; sent1 & int11 -> int12: the duster does not occur.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the interpenetration occurs and/or the spluttering happens.; int13 & sent11 & sent7 -> int14: the Iraqiness happens.; sent12 & int14 -> int15: the floundering does not occur and/or the elegantness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the heteroeciousness happens and the staging occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the proportionateness does not occur and the leaning creepy-crawlies does not occur is not right then the duster does not occur. sent2: if the psychiatricness does not occur then the regenerateness does not occur but the chordalness occurs. sent3: the leaning sluicing happens and/or the genitalness occurs. sent4: that both the non-Achaeanness and the non-unopposableness occurs is triggered by that the neurosurgery occurs. sent5: if the Achaeanness does not occur then the fact that the meow happens and the conjunctness occurs is not right. sent6: if the leaning sluicing occurs then the costiveness happens. sent7: the Iraqi is caused by that the spluttering occurs. sent8: that the repoting jigger does not occur results in that the heteroeciousness happens. sent9: not the psychiatricness but the blinding perfecter occurs. sent10: the disassociating and the conjunctness occurs. sent11: that the Iraqi occurs is brought about by that the interpenetration occurs. sent12: if that the Iraqi happens hold the floundering does not occur or the elegantness does not occur or both. sent13: if the regenerateness does not occur that the proportionateness does not occur and the leaning creepy-crawlies does not occur does not hold. sent14: if the duster does not occur the interpenetration happens and/or the spluttering occurs. sent15: the repoting jigger and the disassociating occurs if the conjunctness does not occur. sent16: the costiveness occurs if the genitalness happens. sent17: the fact that the staging occurs hold. sent18: if that both the meowing and the conjunctness occurs is false then the conjunctness does not occur. sent19: if the leaning sluicing does not occur then that the heteroeciousness occurs and the staging happens is not right. sent20: the conjunctness occurs. sent21: that the disassociating does not occur is caused by that the costiveness and the repoting jigger happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the costiveness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the repoting jigger occurs is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the costiveness and the repoting jigger happens.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the disassociating does not occur.; sent10 -> int4: the disassociating happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the repoting jigger does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the heteroeciousness happens.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__