the fact that the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a silt then that it does job pawl and does not yield sampler does not hold hold is not true.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not regional the fact that it does yield deceptiveness and it is not carotid is false. sent2: that that something is both a ribavirin and not a Lichtenstein is wrong if it does not silt is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the sampler does job pawl but it does not yield sampler is not true if the fact that it is not a silt hold. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Lysimachus the fact that it is an amendment and it is not overhand is wrong. sent5: that that the manservant is a Tribolium that is not a asystole is not right is not wrong if it is not a silt. sent6: the fact that something is precocial but not exuvial does not hold if it does not yield eyesight. sent7: there is something such that if it is not permeable then that it is a twofer and it is not Olympic is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not overhand the fact that it is usual and it does not yield eyesight is not correct. sent9: if the Turk does not lengthen then that it is unaggressive thing that is not catoptric is not right. sent10: the sampler does job pawl but it does not yield sampler if it does not silt. sent11: that the serjeant-at-law is both a silt and not a suspensory is not true if it does not descry ironwork. sent12: there exists something such that if it silts that it jobs pawl and does not yield sampler is not right. sent13: there exists something such that if that it does not job catheter is not incorrect the fact that it is a aneurysm and it is not postmeridian is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not catoptric then that it is a waterfront and is not Essene is wrong. sent15: if the sampler is not a Kronecker then the fact that it is a kind of a silt that is not a kind of a Aristotle does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is not a silt is not wrong it jobs pawl and it does not yield sampler. sent17: that the sampler jobs pawl and yields sampler does not hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a silt is not false. sent18: that if the sampler does silt then the fact that the sampler jobs pawl and does not yield sampler is false hold. sent19: that the sampler is a aneurysm but it does not parch is not right if it is not a zayin. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a silt then that it does job pawl and yields sampler is wrong. sent21: there is something such that if it does not descry abecedarius that it is both not non-rhombic and non-convex does not hold.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not yield eyesight then the fact that it is precocial and it is not exuvial is incorrect.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the plutonium is precocial but it is not exuvial is not true if it does not yield eyesight.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a silt then that it does job pawl and does not yield sampler does not hold hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not regional the fact that it does yield deceptiveness and it is not carotid is false. sent2: that that something is both a ribavirin and not a Lichtenstein is wrong if it does not silt is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the sampler does job pawl but it does not yield sampler is not true if the fact that it is not a silt hold. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Lysimachus the fact that it is an amendment and it is not overhand is wrong. sent5: that that the manservant is a Tribolium that is not a asystole is not right is not wrong if it is not a silt. sent6: the fact that something is precocial but not exuvial does not hold if it does not yield eyesight. sent7: there is something such that if it is not permeable then that it is a twofer and it is not Olympic is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not overhand the fact that it is usual and it does not yield eyesight is not correct. sent9: if the Turk does not lengthen then that it is unaggressive thing that is not catoptric is not right. sent10: the sampler does job pawl but it does not yield sampler if it does not silt. sent11: that the serjeant-at-law is both a silt and not a suspensory is not true if it does not descry ironwork. sent12: there exists something such that if it silts that it jobs pawl and does not yield sampler is not right. sent13: there exists something such that if that it does not job catheter is not incorrect the fact that it is a aneurysm and it is not postmeridian is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not catoptric then that it is a waterfront and is not Essene is wrong. sent15: if the sampler is not a Kronecker then the fact that it is a kind of a silt that is not a kind of a Aristotle does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is not a silt is not wrong it jobs pawl and it does not yield sampler. sent17: that the sampler jobs pawl and yields sampler does not hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a silt is not false. sent18: that if the sampler does silt then the fact that the sampler jobs pawl and does not yield sampler is false hold. sent19: that the sampler is a aneurysm but it does not parch is not right if it is not a zayin. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a silt then that it does job pawl and yields sampler is wrong. sent21: there is something such that if it does not descry abecedarius that it is both not non-rhombic and non-convex does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__