the tappet is a Tabriz.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not sibilate is not incorrect. sent2: the sparker is not a kind of a Nestorius if the crevasse is not boreal. sent3: there is something such that it does sibilate. sent4: the crevasse is non-boreal if the transponder does synthesize review. sent5: the crevasse does not synthesize review and/or does sibilate if the sparker matches. sent6: the tappet is not a Tabriz if the transponder does sibilate and does not synthesize review. sent7: if something does not sibilate the fact that that the transponder synthesizes review and is a match is incorrect hold. sent8: if the bravo is a hypercatalectic the tappet is a kind of a Tabriz. sent9: the crevasse is non-boreal if the fact that the transponder does not synthesize review and matches is not right. sent10: that the transponder does not synthesize review but it does match is not correct if there exists something such that it does not sibilate. sent11: that the transponder does synthesize review and is a match is false. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a Nestorius then the bravo is hypercatalectic. sent13: something is a Nestorius.
sent1 & sent10 -> int1: that the transponder does not synthesize review and is a match is not correct.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the crevasse is not boreal.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the sparker is not a Nestorius.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a Nestorius.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the bravo is a kind of a hypercatalectic.; sent8 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the tappet is not a Tabriz.
$hypothesis$ = the tappet is a Tabriz. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not sibilate is not incorrect. sent2: the sparker is not a kind of a Nestorius if the crevasse is not boreal. sent3: there is something such that it does sibilate. sent4: the crevasse is non-boreal if the transponder does synthesize review. sent5: the crevasse does not synthesize review and/or does sibilate if the sparker matches. sent6: the tappet is not a Tabriz if the transponder does sibilate and does not synthesize review. sent7: if something does not sibilate the fact that that the transponder synthesizes review and is a match is incorrect hold. sent8: if the bravo is a hypercatalectic the tappet is a kind of a Tabriz. sent9: the crevasse is non-boreal if the fact that the transponder does not synthesize review and matches is not right. sent10: that the transponder does not synthesize review but it does match is not correct if there exists something such that it does not sibilate. sent11: that the transponder does synthesize review and is a match is false. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a Nestorius then the bravo is hypercatalectic. sent13: something is a Nestorius. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent10 -> int1: that the transponder does not synthesize review and is a match is not correct.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the crevasse is not boreal.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the sparker is not a Nestorius.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a Nestorius.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the bravo is a kind of a hypercatalectic.; sent8 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__