that the AS is not a kind of a give-and-go and enslaves genitor is false.
sent1: the macroeconomist is not recreational if it is pleochroic or it is not recreational or both. sent2: something is a lackey. sent3: the breadfruit enslaves genitor if the genitor is a kind of mindless thing that beads brachycephalic. sent4: the AS enslaves genitor. sent5: the macroeconomist is pleochroic and/or it is not recreational. sent6: if something is a lackey then the genitor beads brachycephalic but it is not a kind of a gulf. sent7: the fact that if the breadfruit is not sublunar the breadfruit is optional and enslaves gasfield is right. sent8: if the corset does ice macroeconomist then the breadfruit is a gulf. sent9: if the breadfruit is mindless the AS is not a give-and-go. sent10: the corset ices macroeconomist if the macroeconomist does ices macroeconomist. sent11: if something is not recreational either it ices macroeconomist or it is not statesmanlike or both. sent12: The genitor enslaves AS. sent13: the breadfruit is not sublunar. sent14: something does bead brachycephalic if the fact that it does not bead brachycephalic and is mindless is incorrect. sent15: the corset ices macroeconomist if the macroeconomist is unstatesmanlike. sent16: if something that does bead brachycephalic is a kind of a gulf then the genitor is not a lackey. sent17: something that ices macroeconomist is mindless. sent18: the fact that the breadfruit does ice macroeconomist is correct if the fact that the genitor does bead brachycephalic and it is a kind of a gulf is right. sent19: if the genitor does bead brachycephalic and is not a gulf the breadfruit ices macroeconomist. sent20: the genitor is not a kind of a gulf if there is something such that it is a lackey. sent21: the fact that something does not bead brachycephalic but it is mindless is not true if it is optional.
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the genitor beads brachycephalic and is not a gulf.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the breadfruit ices macroeconomist.; sent17 -> int3: if the breadfruit ices macroeconomist then it is mindless.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the breadfruit is mindless.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the AS is not a give-and-go.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the AS is not a kind of a give-and-go but it enslaves genitor is false.
sent14 -> int6: if that the breadfruit does not bead brachycephalic and is mindless is not right it bead brachycephalic.; sent21 -> int7: that the breadfruit does not bead brachycephalic and is mindless does not hold if it is optional.; sent7 & sent13 -> int8: the breadfruit is a kind of optional thing that enslaves gasfield.; int8 -> int9: the breadfruit is optional.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the breadfruit does not bead brachycephalic but it is mindless does not hold.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the breadfruit does bead brachycephalic.; sent11 -> int12: the macroeconomist does ice macroeconomist or it is unstatesmanlike or both if it is not recreational.; sent1 & sent5 -> int13: the macroeconomist is not recreational.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the macroeconomist ices macroeconomist and/or is unstatesmanlike.; int14 & sent10 & sent15 -> int15: the corset ices macroeconomist.; sent8 & int15 -> int16: the breadfruit is a gulf.; int11 & int16 -> int17: that the breadfruit does bead brachycephalic and is a gulf is not false.; int17 -> int18: something does bead brachycephalic and it is a kind of a gulf.; int18 & sent16 -> int19: the genitor is not a lackey.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that it is not a lackey.;
$hypothesis$ = that the AS is not a kind of a give-and-go and enslaves genitor is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the macroeconomist is not recreational if it is pleochroic or it is not recreational or both. sent2: something is a lackey. sent3: the breadfruit enslaves genitor if the genitor is a kind of mindless thing that beads brachycephalic. sent4: the AS enslaves genitor. sent5: the macroeconomist is pleochroic and/or it is not recreational. sent6: if something is a lackey then the genitor beads brachycephalic but it is not a kind of a gulf. sent7: the fact that if the breadfruit is not sublunar the breadfruit is optional and enslaves gasfield is right. sent8: if the corset does ice macroeconomist then the breadfruit is a gulf. sent9: if the breadfruit is mindless the AS is not a give-and-go. sent10: the corset ices macroeconomist if the macroeconomist does ices macroeconomist. sent11: if something is not recreational either it ices macroeconomist or it is not statesmanlike or both. sent12: The genitor enslaves AS. sent13: the breadfruit is not sublunar. sent14: something does bead brachycephalic if the fact that it does not bead brachycephalic and is mindless is incorrect. sent15: the corset ices macroeconomist if the macroeconomist is unstatesmanlike. sent16: if something that does bead brachycephalic is a kind of a gulf then the genitor is not a lackey. sent17: something that ices macroeconomist is mindless. sent18: the fact that the breadfruit does ice macroeconomist is correct if the fact that the genitor does bead brachycephalic and it is a kind of a gulf is right. sent19: if the genitor does bead brachycephalic and is not a gulf the breadfruit ices macroeconomist. sent20: the genitor is not a kind of a gulf if there is something such that it is a lackey. sent21: the fact that something does not bead brachycephalic but it is mindless is not true if it is optional. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the genitor beads brachycephalic and is not a gulf.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the breadfruit ices macroeconomist.; sent17 -> int3: if the breadfruit ices macroeconomist then it is mindless.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the breadfruit is mindless.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the AS is not a give-and-go.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__