the boneshaker is not a blastoma.
sent1: the fact that something is a cynophobia that detracts does not hold if it is not a kind of a blastoma. sent2: if there is something such that that it does detract and is not alphanumerics is wrong then the tea-strainer does not detract. sent3: if the splitter impedes cybercrime the fact that the hydrochlorothiazide is a kind of a blastoma that does not refine Enlightenment does not hold. sent4: if the tea-strainer is an absolutist that the boneshaker is alphanumerics is not incorrect. sent5: if something does not detract the fact that it refines nineteen and it is not a kind of an absolutist is false. sent6: the podocarp is a geoduck if the fact that it is a nutrition that does not impede warthog is false. sent7: the fact that if that something is a blastoma but it does not refine Enlightenment does not hold it is not a blastoma is right. sent8: that the hydrochlorothiazide detracts but it is not alphanumerics is not right. sent9: the fact that the tea-strainer is a geoduck and it is a kind of an absolutist is wrong if it does not refine nineteen. sent10: the tea-strainer does not refine nineteen if that the boneshaker does refine nineteen but it is not a kind of an absolutist is not right. sent11: the Egyptologist does not refine capitate. sent12: the fact that the reference is not alphanumerics hold if the mechanist is both alphanumerics and not a geoduck. sent13: if the podocarp is a kind of a geoduck then that the mechanist is not a kind of a geoduck but it does detract does not hold. sent14: the boneshaker is not a blastoma if that the mechanist does not refine nineteen but it is a blastoma is false. sent15: The nineteen does not refine podocarp. sent16: the boneshaker does not detract if there is something such that the fact that it is a cynophobia and detract is incorrect. sent17: the splitter does impede cybercrime if there is something such that the fact that it does not refine capitate is not false. sent18: the boneshaker is a blastoma if it is alphanumerics. sent19: if there exists something such that that it does not refine nineteen hold the mechanist is alphanumerics thing that is not a geoduck. sent20: the podocarp does not refine nineteen. sent21: if something does not refine nineteen the fact that it is a nutrition and does not impede warthog is not true. sent22: that the tea-strainer is an absolutist if that the mechanist is not a geoduck but it detracts is false is correct.
sent21 -> int1: the fact that the podocarp is a nutrition but it does not impede warthog is not right if it does not refine nineteen.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the fact that the podocarp is a nutrition but it does not impede warthog is incorrect.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the podocarp is a kind of a geoduck.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the mechanist is not a kind of a geoduck and detracts is incorrect.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the tea-strainer is a kind of an absolutist.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the boneshaker is alphanumerics.; int6 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the reference is not alphanumerics.
sent5 -> int7: that the boneshaker does refine nineteen but it is not an absolutist is not correct if it does not detract.; sent1 -> int8: the fact that the hydrochlorothiazide is a cynophobia and detracts does not hold if it is not a kind of a blastoma.; sent7 -> int9: if that the hydrochlorothiazide is a blastoma and does not refine Enlightenment is wrong then it is not a blastoma.; sent11 -> int10: there exists something such that it does not refine capitate.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the splitter does impede cybercrime.; sent3 & int11 -> int12: that the hydrochlorothiazide is a blastoma and does not refine Enlightenment does not hold.; int9 & int12 -> int13: the hydrochlorothiazide is not a blastoma.; int8 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the hydrochlorothiazide is a cynophobia and detracts is incorrect.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it is a cynophobia and it detracts does not hold.; int15 & sent16 -> int16: the boneshaker does not detract.; int7 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the boneshaker refines nineteen and is not an absolutist is not correct.; sent10 & int17 -> int18: the tea-strainer does not refine nineteen.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it does not refine nineteen.; int19 & sent19 -> int20: the mechanist is alphanumerics but not a geoduck.; sent12 & int20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the boneshaker is not a blastoma. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a cynophobia that detracts does not hold if it is not a kind of a blastoma. sent2: if there is something such that that it does detract and is not alphanumerics is wrong then the tea-strainer does not detract. sent3: if the splitter impedes cybercrime the fact that the hydrochlorothiazide is a kind of a blastoma that does not refine Enlightenment does not hold. sent4: if the tea-strainer is an absolutist that the boneshaker is alphanumerics is not incorrect. sent5: if something does not detract the fact that it refines nineteen and it is not a kind of an absolutist is false. sent6: the podocarp is a geoduck if the fact that it is a nutrition that does not impede warthog is false. sent7: the fact that if that something is a blastoma but it does not refine Enlightenment does not hold it is not a blastoma is right. sent8: that the hydrochlorothiazide detracts but it is not alphanumerics is not right. sent9: the fact that the tea-strainer is a geoduck and it is a kind of an absolutist is wrong if it does not refine nineteen. sent10: the tea-strainer does not refine nineteen if that the boneshaker does refine nineteen but it is not a kind of an absolutist is not right. sent11: the Egyptologist does not refine capitate. sent12: the fact that the reference is not alphanumerics hold if the mechanist is both alphanumerics and not a geoduck. sent13: if the podocarp is a kind of a geoduck then that the mechanist is not a kind of a geoduck but it does detract does not hold. sent14: the boneshaker is not a blastoma if that the mechanist does not refine nineteen but it is a blastoma is false. sent15: The nineteen does not refine podocarp. sent16: the boneshaker does not detract if there is something such that the fact that it is a cynophobia and detract is incorrect. sent17: the splitter does impede cybercrime if there is something such that the fact that it does not refine capitate is not false. sent18: the boneshaker is a blastoma if it is alphanumerics. sent19: if there exists something such that that it does not refine nineteen hold the mechanist is alphanumerics thing that is not a geoduck. sent20: the podocarp does not refine nineteen. sent21: if something does not refine nineteen the fact that it is a nutrition and does not impede warthog is not true. sent22: that the tea-strainer is an absolutist if that the mechanist is not a geoduck but it detracts is false is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: the fact that the podocarp is a nutrition but it does not impede warthog is not right if it does not refine nineteen.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the fact that the podocarp is a nutrition but it does not impede warthog is incorrect.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the podocarp is a kind of a geoduck.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the mechanist is not a kind of a geoduck and detracts is incorrect.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the tea-strainer is a kind of an absolutist.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the boneshaker is alphanumerics.; int6 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__