the fact that the etagere does glamorize Poterium hold.
sent1: if the fact that the gesso is not awkward is not incorrect the bolide is a gape or it does not concretize ileostomy or both. sent2: if either the bolide is a gape or it does not concretize ileostomy or both that the Esselen is not a kind of a chromatism is right. sent3: the bolide does gape or concretizes ileostomy or both. sent4: if the bolide is a kind of a chromatism then that the gesso does not glamorize Poterium and is not awkward is wrong. sent5: the Esselen is a kind of a chromatism if the driftwood is a chromatism. sent6: the Esselen is not a chromatism if that the bolide does not concretize ileostomy is true. sent7: if the gesso is not awkward the bolide is a gape and/or it does concretize ileostomy. sent8: the fact that the macaque is a kind of unerect thing that is a wain is incorrect if the reflector palavers. sent9: if the reflector does palaver that the macaque is a kind of erect thing that is a kind of a wain is incorrect. sent10: the reflector is a palaver if the gesso is awkward. sent11: if something does not madden taekwondo the fact that it is a wain and/or it is not a dangerousness is not right. sent12: something is not a chromatism and it is not awkward if it is a kind of a palaver. sent13: the etagere does glamorize Poterium if that the macaque is unerect is right. sent14: the fact that that the macaque is unerect and is a wain is not false is not true. sent15: the driftwood is a kind of a chromatism. sent16: if the fact that the Esselen is a wain and/or it is not a kind of a dangerousness is not true it is not unerect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gesso is non-awkward is not incorrect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the bolide either gapes or does not concretize ileostomy or both.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Esselen is not a chromatism.; sent5 & sent15 -> int3: the Esselen is a chromatism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the gesso is awkward.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the reflector is a palaver.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that that the macaque is not unerect but it is a wain is not false does not hold.;
the timepiece does madden gesso and/or it is not a kind of a chromatism.
sent12 -> int8: that the timepiece is not a chromatism and it is not awkward hold if it is a palaver.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the etagere does glamorize Poterium hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the gesso is not awkward is not incorrect the bolide is a gape or it does not concretize ileostomy or both. sent2: if either the bolide is a gape or it does not concretize ileostomy or both that the Esselen is not a kind of a chromatism is right. sent3: the bolide does gape or concretizes ileostomy or both. sent4: if the bolide is a kind of a chromatism then that the gesso does not glamorize Poterium and is not awkward is wrong. sent5: the Esselen is a kind of a chromatism if the driftwood is a chromatism. sent6: the Esselen is not a chromatism if that the bolide does not concretize ileostomy is true. sent7: if the gesso is not awkward the bolide is a gape and/or it does concretize ileostomy. sent8: the fact that the macaque is a kind of unerect thing that is a wain is incorrect if the reflector palavers. sent9: if the reflector does palaver that the macaque is a kind of erect thing that is a kind of a wain is incorrect. sent10: the reflector is a palaver if the gesso is awkward. sent11: if something does not madden taekwondo the fact that it is a wain and/or it is not a dangerousness is not right. sent12: something is not a chromatism and it is not awkward if it is a kind of a palaver. sent13: the etagere does glamorize Poterium if that the macaque is unerect is right. sent14: the fact that that the macaque is unerect and is a wain is not false is not true. sent15: the driftwood is a kind of a chromatism. sent16: if the fact that the Esselen is a wain and/or it is not a kind of a dangerousness is not true it is not unerect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gesso is non-awkward is not incorrect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the bolide either gapes or does not concretize ileostomy or both.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Esselen is not a chromatism.; sent5 & sent15 -> int3: the Esselen is a chromatism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the gesso is awkward.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the reflector is a palaver.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that that the macaque is not unerect but it is a wain is not false does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__