the flux does stargaze.
sent1: the forefoot is not oleaceous if the fact that it is oleaceous and accredits shaven is wrong. sent2: the free-liver is neurotoxic if the fact that the baster is not a bowl and it is not neurotoxic is false. sent3: if the forefoot is not neurotoxic then that the free-liver is non-implacable thing that stargazes does not hold. sent4: that the forefoot is oleaceous and it does accredit shaven is not true. sent5: if the free-liver is implacable and it is neurotoxic the flux does not stargaze. sent6: if the fact that the free-liver is a kind of stylish thing that is not locker-room is incorrect the flux is neurotoxic. sent7: if the fact that something is a Duma or it is not actinal or both is not correct then it is not a drawing. sent8: if something is neurotoxic it stargazes. sent9: the towhee is not non-neurotoxic. sent10: if that the free-liver is not stylish is true then the flux is neurotoxic. sent11: the fact that the free-liver is a Duma or it is not actinal or both is incorrect if the forefoot is not oleaceous. sent12: that the free-liver is a kind of stylish thing that is not locker-room is false. sent13: if something is not a drawing it is a kind of implacable a Pluteus.
sent6 & sent12 -> int1: the flux is neurotoxic.; sent8 -> int2: if the flux is neurotoxic then the fact that it does stargaze hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the flux does not stargaze.
$hypothesis$ = the flux does stargaze. ; $context$ = sent1: the forefoot is not oleaceous if the fact that it is oleaceous and accredits shaven is wrong. sent2: the free-liver is neurotoxic if the fact that the baster is not a bowl and it is not neurotoxic is false. sent3: if the forefoot is not neurotoxic then that the free-liver is non-implacable thing that stargazes does not hold. sent4: that the forefoot is oleaceous and it does accredit shaven is not true. sent5: if the free-liver is implacable and it is neurotoxic the flux does not stargaze. sent6: if the fact that the free-liver is a kind of stylish thing that is not locker-room is incorrect the flux is neurotoxic. sent7: if the fact that something is a Duma or it is not actinal or both is not correct then it is not a drawing. sent8: if something is neurotoxic it stargazes. sent9: the towhee is not non-neurotoxic. sent10: if that the free-liver is not stylish is true then the flux is neurotoxic. sent11: the fact that the free-liver is a Duma or it is not actinal or both is incorrect if the forefoot is not oleaceous. sent12: that the free-liver is a kind of stylish thing that is not locker-room is false. sent13: if something is not a drawing it is a kind of implacable a Pluteus. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent12 -> int1: the flux is neurotoxic.; sent8 -> int2: if the flux is neurotoxic then the fact that it does stargaze hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__