that the Testudo is not a love-song hold.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Californian and it is not non-pessimistic is not true. sent2: the burro is a kind of a clavichord and it forages legibility. sent3: if something is not astomatous then the Testudo is not inoffensive. sent4: if the hemiacetal does forage legibility then that the burro is a love-song and not a clavichord is incorrect. sent5: the hemiacetal is not astomatous if the burro is a Mesozoic and/or it is a kind of a clavichord. sent6: if that either something does not heel hajj or it is inoffensive or both is incorrect then it is not a love-song. sent7: if something does not heel hajj and is not inoffensive then it is astomatous. sent8: something does not heel hajj and it is not inoffensive if it is electromotive. sent9: the davenport is electromotive if there exists something such that that it is not Californian and it is pessimistic is incorrect. sent10: something is astomatous and/or is not a clavichord if it is Mesozoic. sent11: if the hemiacetal is not a clavichord then that the burro is a love-song and does forage legibility is not true. sent12: the fact that the Testudo does not heel hajj and/or is inoffensive does not hold if there exists something such that it is non-astomatous.
sent2 -> int1: the burro is a clavichord.; int1 -> int2: the burro is a Mesozoic or is a clavichord or both.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the hemiacetal is not astomatous.; int3 -> int4: there are non-astomatous things.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that either the Testudo does not heel hajj or it is inoffensive or both does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: the Testudo is not a kind of a love-song if the fact that either it does not heel hajj or it is inoffensive or both does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the Testudo is a kind of a love-song.
sent7 -> int7: the davenport is astomatous if it does not heel hajj and it is not inoffensive.; sent8 -> int8: the davenport does not heel hajj and it is not inoffensive if the fact that it is non-electromotive is wrong.; sent1 & sent9 -> int9: the davenport is electromotive.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the davenport does not heel hajj and it is offensive.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the davenport is astomatous.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is astomatous.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Testudo is not a love-song hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Californian and it is not non-pessimistic is not true. sent2: the burro is a kind of a clavichord and it forages legibility. sent3: if something is not astomatous then the Testudo is not inoffensive. sent4: if the hemiacetal does forage legibility then that the burro is a love-song and not a clavichord is incorrect. sent5: the hemiacetal is not astomatous if the burro is a Mesozoic and/or it is a kind of a clavichord. sent6: if that either something does not heel hajj or it is inoffensive or both is incorrect then it is not a love-song. sent7: if something does not heel hajj and is not inoffensive then it is astomatous. sent8: something does not heel hajj and it is not inoffensive if it is electromotive. sent9: the davenport is electromotive if there exists something such that that it is not Californian and it is pessimistic is incorrect. sent10: something is astomatous and/or is not a clavichord if it is Mesozoic. sent11: if the hemiacetal is not a clavichord then that the burro is a love-song and does forage legibility is not true. sent12: the fact that the Testudo does not heel hajj and/or is inoffensive does not hold if there exists something such that it is non-astomatous. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the burro is a clavichord.; int1 -> int2: the burro is a Mesozoic or is a clavichord or both.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the hemiacetal is not astomatous.; int3 -> int4: there are non-astomatous things.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that either the Testudo does not heel hajj or it is inoffensive or both does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: the Testudo is not a kind of a love-song if the fact that either it does not heel hajj or it is inoffensive or both does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__