the go-kart is not administrative but it is a Eden.
sent1: the balsa is a taker if that it does not shop rioter and is not a taker is not true. sent2: that the balsa does not shop rioter and is not a kind of a taker is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the linkage is not a kind of a chafe is not false. sent4: something that bogs affirmative and is not transatlantic is not adoptable. sent5: there is something such that it levitates. sent6: the go-kart is not administrative but it is a Eden if the balsa is not a kind of a Eden. sent7: the cornflower is a taker if the linkage chafes. sent8: the myosin does not shop cornflower if there is something such that the fact that it either is amphoteric or does not shop rioter or both is not right. sent9: if the balsa does not chafe the linkage does not shop rioter. sent10: if something is not adoptable it does caper irrational and shops cornflower. sent11: if the linkage is a Eden the myosin is a chafe. sent12: if something does not shop cornflower then it is adoptable. sent13: if that something is non-amphoteric thing that does shop rioter is not correct it is not a taker. sent14: the fact that the linkage is adoptable and is a chafe is correct if the balsa does not shop cornflower. sent15: an adoptable thing is a savage. sent16: the fact that the cleavers is not amphoteric and shops rioter is incorrect if there is something such that it levitates. sent17: the balsa is adoptable if the fact that it is not a improbability and is adoptable is not correct. sent18: if that the go-kart is not administrative and does not shop rioter is not correct the fact that it is administrative is not incorrect. sent19: the fact that the linkage does chafe is not wrong if that it does not shop rioter and is not a chafe is not correct. sent20: if the linkage is a kind of a chafe then the fact that the go-kart is not administrative but it is a Eden is false. sent21: something that does chafe does caper irrational. sent22: if the linkage is administrative it is a taker. sent23: that there exists something such that that it is amphoteric and/or it does not shop rioter is wrong is not wrong. sent24: if the linkage is not a kind of a chafe then the fact that the balsa bogs affirmative but it is not transatlantic hold. sent25: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a taker then that the CO2 does not shop cornflower and/or it does not caper irrational is false. sent26: that something does caper irrational but it is not a Eden is wrong if that it is administrative is not false.
sent24 & sent3 -> int1: the balsa does bog affirmative and is not transatlantic.; sent4 -> int2: the balsa is not adoptable if it bogs affirmative and is not transatlantic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the balsa is unadoptable is right.; sent10 -> int4: if the balsa is not adoptable it does caper irrational and shops cornflower.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the balsa capers irrational and it does shop cornflower.; int5 -> int6: the balsa does caper irrational.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the balsa is a kind of a Eden is correct.; int6 & assump1 -> int7: the balsa capers irrational and it is a Eden.; sent1 & sent2 -> int8: the balsa is a taker.;
the cornflower is a taker.
sent26 -> int9: that the go-kart does caper irrational but it is not a kind of a Eden does not hold if it is administrative.;
$hypothesis$ = the go-kart is not administrative but it is a Eden. ; $context$ = sent1: the balsa is a taker if that it does not shop rioter and is not a taker is not true. sent2: that the balsa does not shop rioter and is not a kind of a taker is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the linkage is not a kind of a chafe is not false. sent4: something that bogs affirmative and is not transatlantic is not adoptable. sent5: there is something such that it levitates. sent6: the go-kart is not administrative but it is a Eden if the balsa is not a kind of a Eden. sent7: the cornflower is a taker if the linkage chafes. sent8: the myosin does not shop cornflower if there is something such that the fact that it either is amphoteric or does not shop rioter or both is not right. sent9: if the balsa does not chafe the linkage does not shop rioter. sent10: if something is not adoptable it does caper irrational and shops cornflower. sent11: if the linkage is a Eden the myosin is a chafe. sent12: if something does not shop cornflower then it is adoptable. sent13: if that something is non-amphoteric thing that does shop rioter is not correct it is not a taker. sent14: the fact that the linkage is adoptable and is a chafe is correct if the balsa does not shop cornflower. sent15: an adoptable thing is a savage. sent16: the fact that the cleavers is not amphoteric and shops rioter is incorrect if there is something such that it levitates. sent17: the balsa is adoptable if the fact that it is not a improbability and is adoptable is not correct. sent18: if that the go-kart is not administrative and does not shop rioter is not correct the fact that it is administrative is not incorrect. sent19: the fact that the linkage does chafe is not wrong if that it does not shop rioter and is not a chafe is not correct. sent20: if the linkage is a kind of a chafe then the fact that the go-kart is not administrative but it is a Eden is false. sent21: something that does chafe does caper irrational. sent22: if the linkage is administrative it is a taker. sent23: that there exists something such that that it is amphoteric and/or it does not shop rioter is wrong is not wrong. sent24: if the linkage is not a kind of a chafe then the fact that the balsa bogs affirmative but it is not transatlantic hold. sent25: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a taker then that the CO2 does not shop cornflower and/or it does not caper irrational is false. sent26: that something does caper irrational but it is not a Eden is wrong if that it is administrative is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent3 -> int1: the balsa does bog affirmative and is not transatlantic.; sent4 -> int2: the balsa is not adoptable if it bogs affirmative and is not transatlantic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the balsa is unadoptable is right.; sent10 -> int4: if the balsa is not adoptable it does caper irrational and shops cornflower.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the balsa capers irrational and it does shop cornflower.; int5 -> int6: the balsa does caper irrational.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the balsa is a kind of a Eden is correct.; int6 & assump1 -> int7: the balsa capers irrational and it is a Eden.; sent1 & sent2 -> int8: the balsa is a taker.; __UNKNOWN__