the meson lunches hit.
sent1: the fact that the squill is arsenious thing that does not emit does not hold if it is a kind of a meconium. sent2: the squill is a kind of a meconium. sent3: if there exists something such that it is scalable then the fact that the caspase is not a Unionidae and does lunch alleviator is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a Unionidae that lunches alleviator does not hold. sent5: the fact that the squill is arsenious and does not emit is not correct. sent6: the squill is non-arsenious thing that is not a Unionidae. sent7: if something is a kind of a meconium that the caspase is not a Unionidae and does emit does not hold. sent8: something is a fevered but it is not a stroboscope. sent9: if the squill is arsenious then that it is not a stroboscope is not false. sent10: something is not a kind of a stroboscope. sent11: if something is arsenious then it is not a stroboscope. sent12: there is something such that it is not a Unionidae and it does lunch alleviator. sent13: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a meconium the fact that the squill is not a stroboscope and is arsenious is false. sent14: the caspase is not scalable. sent15: if something that is not a fevered is not a kind of a stroboscope then the meson does lunch hit. sent16: the fact that the squill is a half hold. sent17: if the fact that something is not arsenious and it does not emit is not true then that it is not a stroboscope hold. sent18: that the squill is a kind of non-arsenious thing that does not emit does not hold if it is a meconium. sent19: something is scalable. sent20: the squill is not scalable. sent21: if the caspase is a kind of a fevered then that it does not emit and it is not a Unionidae is not right. sent22: the squill is not a fevered if there exists something such that it does not lunch alleviator. sent23: the meson is not arsenious. sent24: there exists something such that it is not a fevered. sent25: the squill is not a fevered if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Unionidae and does lunch alleviator is not right.
sent19 & sent3 -> int1: that the caspase is not a Unionidae but it does lunch alleviator is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Unionidae and does lunch alleviator is not right.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the squill is not a fevered.; sent17 -> int4: if the fact that the squill is a kind of non-arsenious thing that does not emit is incorrect it is not a stroboscope.; sent18 & sent2 -> int5: that the squill is not arsenious and it does not emit does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the squill is a stroboscope does not hold is not incorrect.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the squill is not a fevered and it is not a kind of a stroboscope.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is both not a fevered and not a stroboscope.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the meson lunches hit. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the squill is arsenious thing that does not emit does not hold if it is a kind of a meconium. sent2: the squill is a kind of a meconium. sent3: if there exists something such that it is scalable then the fact that the caspase is not a Unionidae and does lunch alleviator is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a Unionidae that lunches alleviator does not hold. sent5: the fact that the squill is arsenious and does not emit is not correct. sent6: the squill is non-arsenious thing that is not a Unionidae. sent7: if something is a kind of a meconium that the caspase is not a Unionidae and does emit does not hold. sent8: something is a fevered but it is not a stroboscope. sent9: if the squill is arsenious then that it is not a stroboscope is not false. sent10: something is not a kind of a stroboscope. sent11: if something is arsenious then it is not a stroboscope. sent12: there is something such that it is not a Unionidae and it does lunch alleviator. sent13: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a meconium the fact that the squill is not a stroboscope and is arsenious is false. sent14: the caspase is not scalable. sent15: if something that is not a fevered is not a kind of a stroboscope then the meson does lunch hit. sent16: the fact that the squill is a half hold. sent17: if the fact that something is not arsenious and it does not emit is not true then that it is not a stroboscope hold. sent18: that the squill is a kind of non-arsenious thing that does not emit does not hold if it is a meconium. sent19: something is scalable. sent20: the squill is not scalable. sent21: if the caspase is a kind of a fevered then that it does not emit and it is not a Unionidae is not right. sent22: the squill is not a fevered if there exists something such that it does not lunch alleviator. sent23: the meson is not arsenious. sent24: there exists something such that it is not a fevered. sent25: the squill is not a fevered if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Unionidae and does lunch alleviator is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent3 -> int1: that the caspase is not a Unionidae but it does lunch alleviator is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Unionidae and does lunch alleviator is not right.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the squill is not a fevered.; sent17 -> int4: if the fact that the squill is a kind of non-arsenious thing that does not emit is incorrect it is not a stroboscope.; sent18 & sent2 -> int5: that the squill is not arsenious and it does not emit does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the squill is a stroboscope does not hold is not incorrect.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the squill is not a fevered and it is not a kind of a stroboscope.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is both not a fevered and not a stroboscope.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__