the urinariness does not occur.
sent1: that the Jordanian and the stampeding mastopexy happens is triggered by that the quenching office-bearer does not occur. sent2: the enacting Hun does not occur. sent3: the counterrevolutionariness happens and the bonfire occurs. sent4: that the recourse happens and/or the stampeding tulipwood does not occur is incorrect if the enacting Hun does not occur. sent5: the fact that the quenching Saintpaulia occurs and the arc does not occur is incorrect. sent6: if that the quenching Saintpaulia but not the arc occurs is incorrect the quenching office-bearer does not occur. sent7: that both the orthodoxness and the Jordanian happens prevents that the urinariness occurs. sent8: that not the gesture but the Albanian occurs prevents the non-proceduralness. sent9: if the orthodoxness but not the recourse occurs then the proceduralness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the proceduralness occurs is not wrong then either the recourse occurs or the stampeding tulipwood does not occur or both. sent11: the newspapering and the confidentness occurs if the industrialness does not occur. sent12: the quenching pyrostat occurs and the stampeding tulipwood occurs if that the proceduralness does not occur is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gesture does not occur and the Albanianness occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the proceduralness happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the recourse happens or the stampeding tulipwood does not occur or both.; sent4 & sent2 -> int3: that either the recourse happens or the stampeding tulipwood does not occur or both is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the gesture does not occur but the Albanianness happens is incorrect.; sent6 & sent5 -> int6: the quenching office-bearer does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the Jordanianness happens and the stampeding mastopexy occurs.; int7 -> int8: the Jordanian happens.;
the quenching pyrostat occurs or the implicationalness does not occur or both.
$hypothesis$ = the urinariness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Jordanian and the stampeding mastopexy happens is triggered by that the quenching office-bearer does not occur. sent2: the enacting Hun does not occur. sent3: the counterrevolutionariness happens and the bonfire occurs. sent4: that the recourse happens and/or the stampeding tulipwood does not occur is incorrect if the enacting Hun does not occur. sent5: the fact that the quenching Saintpaulia occurs and the arc does not occur is incorrect. sent6: if that the quenching Saintpaulia but not the arc occurs is incorrect the quenching office-bearer does not occur. sent7: that both the orthodoxness and the Jordanian happens prevents that the urinariness occurs. sent8: that not the gesture but the Albanian occurs prevents the non-proceduralness. sent9: if the orthodoxness but not the recourse occurs then the proceduralness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the proceduralness occurs is not wrong then either the recourse occurs or the stampeding tulipwood does not occur or both. sent11: the newspapering and the confidentness occurs if the industrialness does not occur. sent12: the quenching pyrostat occurs and the stampeding tulipwood occurs if that the proceduralness does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gesture does not occur and the Albanianness occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the proceduralness happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the recourse happens or the stampeding tulipwood does not occur or both.; sent4 & sent2 -> int3: that either the recourse happens or the stampeding tulipwood does not occur or both is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the gesture does not occur but the Albanianness happens is incorrect.; sent6 & sent5 -> int6: the quenching office-bearer does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the Jordanianness happens and the stampeding mastopexy occurs.; int7 -> int8: the Jordanian happens.; __UNKNOWN__