the artist is .38-caliber.
sent1: if something is not varicelliform that it is not a fling but .38-caliber is not true. sent2: if something is not a woodpecker then that it does not cash and is not audio-lingual is not true. sent3: if something that flings is varicelliform the diapir is audio-lingual. sent4: the collagen flings. sent5: that the bobby is not .38-caliber and it is not varicelliform is wrong if it does fling. sent6: something is varicelliform. sent7: that the artist is audio-lingual hold if the diapir is a woodpecker. sent8: the candelabrum is not choleraic. sent9: the topiary is a cash. sent10: the diapir is .38-caliber if the collagen is .38-caliber. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a cash and is non-audio-lingual is wrong then the bobby is a fling. sent12: the fact that something is a fling is not incorrect. sent13: the bobby cashes if the diapir is audio-lingual. sent14: there are audio-lingual things. sent15: the artist is a woodpecker if the bobby is a kind of a cash. sent16: there exists something such that it is a catchall and is an infatuation. sent17: the fact that the collagen is a woodpecker is true. sent18: the collagen is varicelliform. sent19: something that is a woodpecker is .38-caliber.
sent4 & sent18 -> int1: the collagen flings and it is varicelliform.; int1 -> int2: something is a fling that is varicelliform.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the diapir is audio-lingual.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the bobby cashes.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the artist is a woodpecker.; sent19 -> int6: if the artist is a woodpecker it is .38-caliber.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the artist is not .38-caliber.
sent1 -> int7: if the artist is not varicelliform that it is not a fling and it is .38-caliber is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the artist is .38-caliber. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not varicelliform that it is not a fling but .38-caliber is not true. sent2: if something is not a woodpecker then that it does not cash and is not audio-lingual is not true. sent3: if something that flings is varicelliform the diapir is audio-lingual. sent4: the collagen flings. sent5: that the bobby is not .38-caliber and it is not varicelliform is wrong if it does fling. sent6: something is varicelliform. sent7: that the artist is audio-lingual hold if the diapir is a woodpecker. sent8: the candelabrum is not choleraic. sent9: the topiary is a cash. sent10: the diapir is .38-caliber if the collagen is .38-caliber. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a cash and is non-audio-lingual is wrong then the bobby is a fling. sent12: the fact that something is a fling is not incorrect. sent13: the bobby cashes if the diapir is audio-lingual. sent14: there are audio-lingual things. sent15: the artist is a woodpecker if the bobby is a kind of a cash. sent16: there exists something such that it is a catchall and is an infatuation. sent17: the fact that the collagen is a woodpecker is true. sent18: the collagen is varicelliform. sent19: something that is a woodpecker is .38-caliber. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent18 -> int1: the collagen flings and it is varicelliform.; int1 -> int2: something is a fling that is varicelliform.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the diapir is audio-lingual.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the bobby cashes.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the artist is a woodpecker.; sent19 -> int6: if the artist is a woodpecker it is .38-caliber.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__