the fact that there is something such that if it is not auspicious the fact that it is a kind of a Marciano that does destabilize is wrong is wrong.
sent1: if something is inauspicious then that that it is a kind of a Marciano that does destabilize is not incorrect is not true. sent2: the fact that something is a remilitarization that is hemal is not correct if it is a catboat. sent3: if the batting is not common the fact that it is a kind of a silene and it does wine hold. sent4: if the batting is auspicious that it is a kind of a Marciano and it destabilizes is not right. sent5: something is uppercase thing that is minimal if it is not accommodational. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not auspicious it is a kind of a Marciano that does destabilize. sent7: there exists something such that if it is auspicious that it is a Marciano and it does destabilize is not right. sent8: that the batting destabilizes and it is a Shakespearian is incorrect if it is not chalybeate. sent9: if the fiduciary does not cream accord it is a kind of auspicious a jaundiced.
sent1 -> int1: if the batting is not auspicious then that it is a kind of a Marciano and destabilizes does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not auspicious the fact that it is a kind of a Marciano that does destabilize is wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is inauspicious then that that it is a kind of a Marciano that does destabilize is not incorrect is not true. sent2: the fact that something is a remilitarization that is hemal is not correct if it is a catboat. sent3: if the batting is not common the fact that it is a kind of a silene and it does wine hold. sent4: if the batting is auspicious that it is a kind of a Marciano and it destabilizes is not right. sent5: something is uppercase thing that is minimal if it is not accommodational. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not auspicious it is a kind of a Marciano that does destabilize. sent7: there exists something such that if it is auspicious that it is a Marciano and it does destabilize is not right. sent8: that the batting destabilizes and it is a Shakespearian is incorrect if it is not chalybeate. sent9: if the fiduciary does not cream accord it is a kind of auspicious a jaundiced. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the batting is not auspicious then that it is a kind of a Marciano and destabilizes does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__