the patching happens.
sent1: if the fact that the immiscibleness or the regency or both occurs is not true then the fact that the subdividing gastrectomy does not occur is not wrong. sent2: that the traditionalness does not occur causes that the naturopathy happens and the contumacy occurs. sent3: the contumacy does not occur if the rogation occurs and the traditionalness occurs. sent4: the exposure does not occur. sent5: that the amauroticness and the algebraicness occurs leads to that the naturopathy does not occur. sent6: the BAN and the uplift happens if the amauroticness does not occur. sent7: the contumacy happens if the traditionalness does not occur. sent8: the contumacy occurs. sent9: if the maintenance does not occur then both the providentialness and the erythroidness happens. sent10: the fact that the fact that the naturopathy does not occur and the algebraicness does not occur does not hold is correct if the regency occurs. sent11: the parlaying occurs and the heathlikeness occurs. sent12: either the subdividing gastrectomy occurs or the immiscibleness occurs or both if the contumacy does not occur. sent13: the non-algebraicness leads to that the regency does not occur. sent14: that the fact that the dunning Waldheim happens or the postbiblicalness happens or both is wrong is correct. sent15: that the patching happens is prevented by that the subdividing gastrectomy does not occur. sent16: the uplifting and the amauroticness occurs. sent17: if the algebraicness does not occur that the immiscibleness happens or the regency occurs or both is not true. sent18: if that the fact that either the hassle happens or the misting occurs or both is correct is not correct the quarterly does not occur. sent19: the uplift happens. sent20: the regency does not occur if that both the non-immiscibleness and the regency occurs is not true. sent21: the traditionalness does not occur and the rogation does not occur. sent22: that the PET happens and/or the unmadeness occurs is wrong. sent23: the regency does not occur. sent24: the calcicness does not occur. sent25: that the shamble happens and the ether does not occur prevents the nontraditionalness. sent26: the patch and the uplifting occurs if the amauroticness does not occur.
sent16 -> int1: the amauroticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the algebraicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the amauroticness and the algebraicness happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the naturopathy does not occur.; sent21 -> int4: the traditionalness does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the naturopathy happens and the contumacy occurs.; int5 -> int6: the naturopathy happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the algebraicness happens does not hold.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: that either the immiscibleness happens or the regency happens or both is wrong.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the subdividing gastrectomy does not occur.; int10 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the patch occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the patching happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the immiscibleness or the regency or both occurs is not true then the fact that the subdividing gastrectomy does not occur is not wrong. sent2: that the traditionalness does not occur causes that the naturopathy happens and the contumacy occurs. sent3: the contumacy does not occur if the rogation occurs and the traditionalness occurs. sent4: the exposure does not occur. sent5: that the amauroticness and the algebraicness occurs leads to that the naturopathy does not occur. sent6: the BAN and the uplift happens if the amauroticness does not occur. sent7: the contumacy happens if the traditionalness does not occur. sent8: the contumacy occurs. sent9: if the maintenance does not occur then both the providentialness and the erythroidness happens. sent10: the fact that the fact that the naturopathy does not occur and the algebraicness does not occur does not hold is correct if the regency occurs. sent11: the parlaying occurs and the heathlikeness occurs. sent12: either the subdividing gastrectomy occurs or the immiscibleness occurs or both if the contumacy does not occur. sent13: the non-algebraicness leads to that the regency does not occur. sent14: that the fact that the dunning Waldheim happens or the postbiblicalness happens or both is wrong is correct. sent15: that the patching happens is prevented by that the subdividing gastrectomy does not occur. sent16: the uplifting and the amauroticness occurs. sent17: if the algebraicness does not occur that the immiscibleness happens or the regency occurs or both is not true. sent18: if that the fact that either the hassle happens or the misting occurs or both is correct is not correct the quarterly does not occur. sent19: the uplift happens. sent20: the regency does not occur if that both the non-immiscibleness and the regency occurs is not true. sent21: the traditionalness does not occur and the rogation does not occur. sent22: that the PET happens and/or the unmadeness occurs is wrong. sent23: the regency does not occur. sent24: the calcicness does not occur. sent25: that the shamble happens and the ether does not occur prevents the nontraditionalness. sent26: the patch and the uplifting occurs if the amauroticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the amauroticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the algebraicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the amauroticness and the algebraicness happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the naturopathy does not occur.; sent21 -> int4: the traditionalness does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the naturopathy happens and the contumacy occurs.; int5 -> int6: the naturopathy happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the algebraicness happens does not hold.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: that either the immiscibleness happens or the regency happens or both is wrong.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the subdividing gastrectomy does not occur.; int10 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__