the fact that there is something such that if it is nebulous it is a kind of egoistic thing that does not entail joylessness is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does rig Istanbul then it is not a retailer. sent2: there exists something such that if it entails orrery then it is not a countermine. sent3: the mail is Masonic but it does not entail joylessness if it is Nordic. sent4: the lepidolite does not entail joylessness if that it is nebulous is correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is nebulous the fact that it does not entail joylessness is not incorrect. sent6: if the culture does rig Lindheimera it does entail joylessness and it does not clout Ichthyosauria. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if that it collars Frankliniella is not false it does not clout lepidolite is correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is imprudent it is alabaster and it is unidirectional. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a broody it is a kind of an alabaster. sent10: there is something such that if it is Masonic then it is not a diffuser. sent11: the lepidolite is a Manawydan and does not relive if it is egoistic. sent12: there is something such that if it is nebulous it is egoistic and it does entail joylessness. sent13: there exists something such that if it entails millionairess then it is not a shinplaster. sent14: if the lepidolite is not non-nebulous then it is egoistic and does not entail joylessness. sent15: something temporizes and is not a Cassius if it does rig assisted. sent16: there is something such that if it is a schipperke it is not hatless. sent17: there exists something such that if it is nebulous it is egoistic.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it rigs assisted it temporizes and it is not a kind of a Cassius.
sent15 -> int1: if the fluvastatin rigs assisted it temporizes and is not a kind of a Cassius.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is nebulous it is a kind of egoistic thing that does not entail joylessness is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does rig Istanbul then it is not a retailer. sent2: there exists something such that if it entails orrery then it is not a countermine. sent3: the mail is Masonic but it does not entail joylessness if it is Nordic. sent4: the lepidolite does not entail joylessness if that it is nebulous is correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is nebulous the fact that it does not entail joylessness is not incorrect. sent6: if the culture does rig Lindheimera it does entail joylessness and it does not clout Ichthyosauria. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if that it collars Frankliniella is not false it does not clout lepidolite is correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is imprudent it is alabaster and it is unidirectional. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a broody it is a kind of an alabaster. sent10: there is something such that if it is Masonic then it is not a diffuser. sent11: the lepidolite is a Manawydan and does not relive if it is egoistic. sent12: there is something such that if it is nebulous it is egoistic and it does entail joylessness. sent13: there exists something such that if it entails millionairess then it is not a shinplaster. sent14: if the lepidolite is not non-nebulous then it is egoistic and does not entail joylessness. sent15: something temporizes and is not a Cassius if it does rig assisted. sent16: there is something such that if it is a schipperke it is not hatless. sent17: there exists something such that if it is nebulous it is egoistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__