the cyberart is an ineffectiveness.
sent1: the geek is not a skepful and does not pink delay if the Finn is not presocratic. sent2: if that the gasbag is a kind of non-general thing that is an ineffectiveness is false then the cyberart is not a kind of an ineffectiveness. sent3: the prune does pink icehouse. sent4: the Finn pinks delay. sent5: if the fact that something is not a sunfish but it does bayonet exponentiation does not hold then it is a sunfish. sent6: something that is not an ineffectiveness pinks Leninism and does pink synod. sent7: the Finn is presocratic and does pink Leninism if the geek does not pink Leninism. sent8: if the geek pinks Leninism then the net does pink synod. sent9: everything is an electromagnetism. sent10: the fact that the envoy is not a sunfish but it does bayonet exponentiation is not true if the geek is not a skepful. sent11: the Finn bayonets exponentiation if something that does pink Leninism is a kind of a skepful. sent12: if there exists something such that that it does bayonet exponentiation and is not a skepful does not hold the geek does not pink Leninism. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not pink delay and is presocratic is incorrect. sent14: the Highlander is derivational and it is an adultery. sent15: The delay pinks Finn. sent16: there is something such that it does not pink synod. sent17: the fact that the net does pink delay and is not a kind of a skepful does not hold. sent18: that the net is not a kind of an ineffectiveness is not wrong if the cyberart is not a BA and it is not a kind of an ineffectiveness. sent19: if the net does pink Leninism the envoy pink Leninism. sent20: if something is an electromagnetism then it does pink Highlander and it is not a BA. sent21: that the net does bayonet exponentiation and is not a skepful is wrong if there exists something such that it does not pink synod. sent22: the cyberart is a kind of an ineffectiveness if there is something such that it pinks Leninism and it does pink delay. sent23: the feist is not presocratic and does not name sequestration.
sent16 & sent21 -> int1: the fact that the net does bayonet exponentiation and is not a kind of a skepful does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it bayonets exponentiation and is not a skepful is not true.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the geek does not pink Leninism.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the Finn is a kind of presocratic thing that does pink Leninism.; int4 -> int5: the Finn pinks Leninism.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the Finn pinks Leninism and it pinks delay.; int6 -> int7: something does pink Leninism and does pink delay.; int7 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the cyberart is not an ineffectiveness.
$hypothesis$ = the cyberart is an ineffectiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: the geek is not a skepful and does not pink delay if the Finn is not presocratic. sent2: if that the gasbag is a kind of non-general thing that is an ineffectiveness is false then the cyberart is not a kind of an ineffectiveness. sent3: the prune does pink icehouse. sent4: the Finn pinks delay. sent5: if the fact that something is not a sunfish but it does bayonet exponentiation does not hold then it is a sunfish. sent6: something that is not an ineffectiveness pinks Leninism and does pink synod. sent7: the Finn is presocratic and does pink Leninism if the geek does not pink Leninism. sent8: if the geek pinks Leninism then the net does pink synod. sent9: everything is an electromagnetism. sent10: the fact that the envoy is not a sunfish but it does bayonet exponentiation is not true if the geek is not a skepful. sent11: the Finn bayonets exponentiation if something that does pink Leninism is a kind of a skepful. sent12: if there exists something such that that it does bayonet exponentiation and is not a skepful does not hold the geek does not pink Leninism. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not pink delay and is presocratic is incorrect. sent14: the Highlander is derivational and it is an adultery. sent15: The delay pinks Finn. sent16: there is something such that it does not pink synod. sent17: the fact that the net does pink delay and is not a kind of a skepful does not hold. sent18: that the net is not a kind of an ineffectiveness is not wrong if the cyberart is not a BA and it is not a kind of an ineffectiveness. sent19: if the net does pink Leninism the envoy pink Leninism. sent20: if something is an electromagnetism then it does pink Highlander and it is not a BA. sent21: that the net does bayonet exponentiation and is not a skepful is wrong if there exists something such that it does not pink synod. sent22: the cyberart is a kind of an ineffectiveness if there is something such that it pinks Leninism and it does pink delay. sent23: the feist is not presocratic and does not name sequestration. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent21 -> int1: the fact that the net does bayonet exponentiation and is not a kind of a skepful does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it bayonets exponentiation and is not a skepful is not true.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the geek does not pink Leninism.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the Finn is a kind of presocratic thing that does pink Leninism.; int4 -> int5: the Finn pinks Leninism.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the Finn pinks Leninism and it pinks delay.; int6 -> int7: something does pink Leninism and does pink delay.; int7 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__