that there exists something such that if it does fritter Flaviviridae and is a Lancastrian then it is not a kind of a circumvention is not right.
sent1: the arbor is not a circumvention if it is a kind of nonindulgent thing that is a burgomaster. sent2: there is something such that if it is computational and it is a flexion then the fact that it does not fritter pushover is not false. sent3: there exists something such that if it restores compliment and it is a kind of a unanimity then it is not a dehumanization. sent4: if the arbor fritters Flaviviridae and it is gemmiferous it is not hydraulics. sent5: if something that is a warlock is commutable then it is not chordal. sent6: there exists something such that if it fritters Flaviviridae and it is a Lancastrian then it is a circumvention. sent7: the arbor does not hedge middy if it does fritter pushover and it is a landowner. sent8: if the arbor does fritter Flaviviridae and it is a kind of a absorbance it does not regenerate. sent9: the arbor is a circumvention if it does fritter Flaviviridae and it is a Lancastrian. sent10: the arbor is not a circumvention if it does fritter Flaviviridae and is Lancastrian. sent11: there exists something such that if it does fritter disaffection and does dissimilate Haywood then it does not hedge Peziza. sent12: if the backbencher does hedge octillion and it does hedge Peziza it does not dissimilate trimaran. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kuru and is a Lewiston then it is not gemmiferous. sent14: the arbor is not keyless if it is a Lancastrian and hedges Chrysothamnus. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a birdlime and it does hedge Eyck then it is not a wester. sent16: there exists something such that if it is nonindulgent and it is an eyespot then it does not hedge Peziza.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is both a warlock and commutable then it is not chordal.
sent5 -> int1: if the bandwagon is a warlock and it is commutable then it is not chordal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does fritter Flaviviridae and is a Lancastrian then it is not a kind of a circumvention is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the arbor is not a circumvention if it is a kind of nonindulgent thing that is a burgomaster. sent2: there is something such that if it is computational and it is a flexion then the fact that it does not fritter pushover is not false. sent3: there exists something such that if it restores compliment and it is a kind of a unanimity then it is not a dehumanization. sent4: if the arbor fritters Flaviviridae and it is gemmiferous it is not hydraulics. sent5: if something that is a warlock is commutable then it is not chordal. sent6: there exists something such that if it fritters Flaviviridae and it is a Lancastrian then it is a circumvention. sent7: the arbor does not hedge middy if it does fritter pushover and it is a landowner. sent8: if the arbor does fritter Flaviviridae and it is a kind of a absorbance it does not regenerate. sent9: the arbor is a circumvention if it does fritter Flaviviridae and it is a Lancastrian. sent10: the arbor is not a circumvention if it does fritter Flaviviridae and is Lancastrian. sent11: there exists something such that if it does fritter disaffection and does dissimilate Haywood then it does not hedge Peziza. sent12: if the backbencher does hedge octillion and it does hedge Peziza it does not dissimilate trimaran. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kuru and is a Lewiston then it is not gemmiferous. sent14: the arbor is not keyless if it is a Lancastrian and hedges Chrysothamnus. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a birdlime and it does hedge Eyck then it is not a wester. sent16: there exists something such that if it is nonindulgent and it is an eyespot then it does not hedge Peziza. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__