the taxidermist is nonreticulate.
sent1: if the taxidermist is not obligational the radicle is nonreticulate. sent2: the exudation is obligational. sent3: the fact that the exudation is a cringle that does not splutter Ussher does not hold. sent4: if something does not splutter BMDO but it is voyeuristic then it does not tweedle acrophony. sent5: something recombines gaskin and is non-Socratic. sent6: if the radicle does not recombine hawkbit the taxidermist tweedles acrophony. sent7: the fact that something does tweedle acrophony but it is not obligational is false if it is a Porte. sent8: if the radicle recombines hawkbit it is not nonreticulate. sent9: if something does not tweedle acrophony either it is a geyser or it recombines hawkbit or both. sent10: something is not nonreticulate if it is a Porte that is not obligational. sent11: the fact that the radicle is nonreticulate and non-obligational is false. sent12: the radicle does recombine hawkbit if there exists something such that it does not recombine drawler. sent13: the gaskin is reticulate. sent14: if something does tweedle acrophony it is nonreticulate. sent15: if something is a Porte and/or obligational then it does not recombine hawkbit. sent16: the taxidermist is a baldachin. sent17: the radicle does not splutter BMDO and is voyeuristic. sent18: the hawkbit does not tweedle acrophony if there exists something such that that it tweedle acrophony and is not obligational is not true. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is both a chalcopyrite and not a Culicidae is false then the taxidermist is a kind of a skyhook. sent20: the taxidermist is not nonreticulate if it splutters Ussher and/or it is obligational. sent21: there is something such that it is a kind of a spleenwort and does not splutter housetop. sent22: there exists something such that that the fact that it is theocratic and it is a kind of an overload hold is wrong. sent23: the radicle is a cringle.
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a cringle and does not splutter Ussher is not correct.; sent15 -> int2: if the radicle is a Porte and/or it is obligational it does not recombine hawkbit.; sent14 -> int3: if the taxidermist does tweedle acrophony it is nonreticulate.;
the fact that the taxidermist is not nonreticulate hold.
sent10 -> int4: the taxidermist is not nonreticulate if it is a Porte and it is not obligational.; sent9 -> int5: either the radicle is a geyser or it recombines hawkbit or both if it does not tweedle acrophony.; sent4 -> int6: the radicle does not tweedle acrophony if it does not splutter BMDO and it is voyeuristic.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the radicle does not tweedle acrophony.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the radicle is a kind of a geyser or it does recombine hawkbit or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the taxidermist is nonreticulate. ; $context$ = sent1: if the taxidermist is not obligational the radicle is nonreticulate. sent2: the exudation is obligational. sent3: the fact that the exudation is a cringle that does not splutter Ussher does not hold. sent4: if something does not splutter BMDO but it is voyeuristic then it does not tweedle acrophony. sent5: something recombines gaskin and is non-Socratic. sent6: if the radicle does not recombine hawkbit the taxidermist tweedles acrophony. sent7: the fact that something does tweedle acrophony but it is not obligational is false if it is a Porte. sent8: if the radicle recombines hawkbit it is not nonreticulate. sent9: if something does not tweedle acrophony either it is a geyser or it recombines hawkbit or both. sent10: something is not nonreticulate if it is a Porte that is not obligational. sent11: the fact that the radicle is nonreticulate and non-obligational is false. sent12: the radicle does recombine hawkbit if there exists something such that it does not recombine drawler. sent13: the gaskin is reticulate. sent14: if something does tweedle acrophony it is nonreticulate. sent15: if something is a Porte and/or obligational then it does not recombine hawkbit. sent16: the taxidermist is a baldachin. sent17: the radicle does not splutter BMDO and is voyeuristic. sent18: the hawkbit does not tweedle acrophony if there exists something such that that it tweedle acrophony and is not obligational is not true. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is both a chalcopyrite and not a Culicidae is false then the taxidermist is a kind of a skyhook. sent20: the taxidermist is not nonreticulate if it splutters Ussher and/or it is obligational. sent21: there is something such that it is a kind of a spleenwort and does not splutter housetop. sent22: there exists something such that that the fact that it is theocratic and it is a kind of an overload hold is wrong. sent23: the radicle is a cringle. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a cringle and does not splutter Ussher is not correct.; sent15 -> int2: if the radicle is a Porte and/or it is obligational it does not recombine hawkbit.; sent14 -> int3: if the taxidermist does tweedle acrophony it is nonreticulate.; __UNKNOWN__