the descendants does not contemn squaretail.
sent1: if that the descendants is not a beggarman and is not a kind of a Phalaropidae is not true the Monk is not malign. sent2: if the descendants does contemn squaretail the fact that it is not a beggarman and it is a Phalaropidae is wrong. sent3: if the overlap does not contemn squaretail the descendants does contemn squaretail and is not muciferous. sent4: the overlap is muciferous but it is not malign if the Monk is not muciferous. sent5: the overlap is not a Phalaropidae. sent6: the cataphyll does not contemn MF if the descendants contemn MF and is not a stopped. sent7: the Monk is a kind of a beggarman but it is not healthful. sent8: if that the Monk is non-malign is not false the overlap is not muciferous. sent9: the descendants does contemn MF but it does not stop if it is a Steatornithidae. sent10: if something is muciferous then that it is non-malign thing that does contemn MF is wrong. sent11: the overlap is malign but it is not muciferous if the Monk is not malign. sent12: the overlap is not malign. sent13: the fact that the descendants is not a beggarman but it is a Phalaropidae does not hold. sent14: if the Monk is not a conspecific and/or is a Steatornithidae the descendants is a Steatornithidae. sent15: the overlap does contemn pluralism. sent16: the descendants is not malign.
the cataphyll is muciferous.
$hypothesis$ = the descendants does not contemn squaretail. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the descendants is not a beggarman and is not a kind of a Phalaropidae is not true the Monk is not malign. sent2: if the descendants does contemn squaretail the fact that it is not a beggarman and it is a Phalaropidae is wrong. sent3: if the overlap does not contemn squaretail the descendants does contemn squaretail and is not muciferous. sent4: the overlap is muciferous but it is not malign if the Monk is not muciferous. sent5: the overlap is not a Phalaropidae. sent6: the cataphyll does not contemn MF if the descendants contemn MF and is not a stopped. sent7: the Monk is a kind of a beggarman but it is not healthful. sent8: if that the Monk is non-malign is not false the overlap is not muciferous. sent9: the descendants does contemn MF but it does not stop if it is a Steatornithidae. sent10: if something is muciferous then that it is non-malign thing that does contemn MF is wrong. sent11: the overlap is malign but it is not muciferous if the Monk is not malign. sent12: the overlap is not malign. sent13: the fact that the descendants is not a beggarman but it is a Phalaropidae does not hold. sent14: if the Monk is not a conspecific and/or is a Steatornithidae the descendants is a Steatornithidae. sent15: the overlap does contemn pluralism. sent16: the descendants is not malign. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__