the fact that something does indurate Monario does not hold.
sent1: that the tilefish is a Congregationalist but it is not Arawakan does not hold if it is a salient. sent2: something is not a flume and not a sphecoid if it is a Sphenodon. sent3: The hex does indurate hypocrite. sent4: the tilefish is a kind of a salient. sent5: if the cayenne is a Pakistani the anatotitan is not expressible and does not clap principality. sent6: there exists something such that it claps arse. sent7: that if something is expressible then it is Pakistani is correct. sent8: the aggressor is not a kind of a Tereshkova if something does indurate Monario and does not indurate hex. sent9: if the hypocrite does indurate hex it is a Sphenodon. sent10: the fact that the aggressor does not clap principality and is a Tereshkova is not right if the hypocrite is not a kind of a sphecoid. sent11: if the hypocrite is not a sphecoid the fact that the aggressor does clap principality and is a Tereshkova is not true. sent12: the fact that the aggressor claps principality and is a kind of a Tereshkova is wrong. sent13: the cayenne indurates harangue if there exists something such that the fact that it does tout geometer and it does clap Hemigrammus is not correct. sent14: the javelin is expressible if the fact that the aggressor does not clap principality and is a kind of a Tereshkova is not right. sent15: the javelin is expressible if the aggressor claps principality. sent16: if something is non-expressible thing that does not clap principality the aggressor is not a Sphenodon. sent17: if something is a kind of a Sphenodon then it is not a flume. sent18: the aggressor is a kind of a Afrocarpus. sent19: if the javelin is Pakistani the anatotitan indurates Monario. sent20: there exists something such that the fact that it does tout geometer and it does clap Hemigrammus is not correct. sent21: if that the hypocrite is not a Tereshkova is right then the fact that the aggressor does not indurate hex and is a Sphenodon is incorrect. sent22: if the Stein does tout chronoscope then the bulkhead indurates Monario but it does not indurate hex. sent23: the Stein touts chronoscope if the grenade touts chronoscope. sent24: the aggressor is non-nilpotent thing that is not a kind of a sphecoid. sent25: if the cayenne does indurate harangue then it is a kind of a Pakistani. sent26: the hypocrite does indurate hex.
sent2 -> int1: the hypocrite is not a flume and not a sphecoid if it is a Sphenodon.; sent9 & sent26 -> int2: that the hypocrite is a Sphenodon is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hypocrite is not a flume and it is not a kind of a sphecoid.; int3 -> int4: the hypocrite is not a sphecoid.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: that the aggressor does not clap principality and is a Tereshkova is not correct.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the javelin is expressible.; sent7 -> int7: the javelin is a Pakistani if it is not inexpressible.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the javelin is not non-Pakistani.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the anatotitan does indurate Monario.; int9 -> hypothesis;
that the javelin is transpolar is right.
sent1 & sent4 -> int10: that the tilefish is a Congregationalist and is not Arawakan is not correct.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is a Congregationalist and it is not Arawakan is false.; sent20 & sent13 -> int12: the cayenne does indurate harangue.; sent25 & int12 -> int13: the cayenne is a Pakistani.; sent5 & int13 -> int14: the anatotitan is non-expressible thing that does not clap principality.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it is a kind of non-expressible thing that does not clap principality.; int15 & sent16 -> int16: the aggressor is not a Sphenodon.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something does indurate Monario does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tilefish is a Congregationalist but it is not Arawakan does not hold if it is a salient. sent2: something is not a flume and not a sphecoid if it is a Sphenodon. sent3: The hex does indurate hypocrite. sent4: the tilefish is a kind of a salient. sent5: if the cayenne is a Pakistani the anatotitan is not expressible and does not clap principality. sent6: there exists something such that it claps arse. sent7: that if something is expressible then it is Pakistani is correct. sent8: the aggressor is not a kind of a Tereshkova if something does indurate Monario and does not indurate hex. sent9: if the hypocrite does indurate hex it is a Sphenodon. sent10: the fact that the aggressor does not clap principality and is a Tereshkova is not right if the hypocrite is not a kind of a sphecoid. sent11: if the hypocrite is not a sphecoid the fact that the aggressor does clap principality and is a Tereshkova is not true. sent12: the fact that the aggressor claps principality and is a kind of a Tereshkova is wrong. sent13: the cayenne indurates harangue if there exists something such that the fact that it does tout geometer and it does clap Hemigrammus is not correct. sent14: the javelin is expressible if the fact that the aggressor does not clap principality and is a kind of a Tereshkova is not right. sent15: the javelin is expressible if the aggressor claps principality. sent16: if something is non-expressible thing that does not clap principality the aggressor is not a Sphenodon. sent17: if something is a kind of a Sphenodon then it is not a flume. sent18: the aggressor is a kind of a Afrocarpus. sent19: if the javelin is Pakistani the anatotitan indurates Monario. sent20: there exists something such that the fact that it does tout geometer and it does clap Hemigrammus is not correct. sent21: if that the hypocrite is not a Tereshkova is right then the fact that the aggressor does not indurate hex and is a Sphenodon is incorrect. sent22: if the Stein does tout chronoscope then the bulkhead indurates Monario but it does not indurate hex. sent23: the Stein touts chronoscope if the grenade touts chronoscope. sent24: the aggressor is non-nilpotent thing that is not a kind of a sphecoid. sent25: if the cayenne does indurate harangue then it is a kind of a Pakistani. sent26: the hypocrite does indurate hex. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the hypocrite is not a flume and not a sphecoid if it is a Sphenodon.; sent9 & sent26 -> int2: that the hypocrite is a Sphenodon is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hypocrite is not a flume and it is not a kind of a sphecoid.; int3 -> int4: the hypocrite is not a sphecoid.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: that the aggressor does not clap principality and is a Tereshkova is not correct.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the javelin is expressible.; sent7 -> int7: the javelin is a Pakistani if it is not inexpressible.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the javelin is not non-Pakistani.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the anatotitan does indurate Monario.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__