the fact that the hot-rod is not a fibril and is a bossism is not right.
sent1: the sheepherder is a sled. sent2: if the dustpan is not a bossism that the fact that the hot-rod is not a fibril but it is a bossism hold is not correct. sent3: the dustpan is not a kind of a bossism if it either is a incaution or does mush primer or both. sent4: the fact that the sheepherder is elastic hold if it is a sled. sent5: something does mush primer if it is monotonic. sent6: the sheepherder is inelastic if something is a reclamation and/or is psychogenic. sent7: that that the hot-rod is both a fibril and a bossism is not true hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dustpan is both a reclamation and not a blackbird.; assump1 -> int1: the dustpan is a kind of a reclamation.; int1 -> int2: the dustpan is either a reclamation or psychogenic or both.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a reclamation or is psychogenic or both.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the sheepherder is not an elastic.; sent4 & sent1 -> int5: the sheepherder is a kind of an elastic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the dustpan is a reclamation and not a blackbird is wrong.; sent5 -> int8: if the fact that the dustpan is monotonic is right then it does mush primer.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hot-rod is not a fibril and is a bossism is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the sheepherder is a sled. sent2: if the dustpan is not a bossism that the fact that the hot-rod is not a fibril but it is a bossism hold is not correct. sent3: the dustpan is not a kind of a bossism if it either is a incaution or does mush primer or both. sent4: the fact that the sheepherder is elastic hold if it is a sled. sent5: something does mush primer if it is monotonic. sent6: the sheepherder is inelastic if something is a reclamation and/or is psychogenic. sent7: that that the hot-rod is both a fibril and a bossism is not true hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dustpan is both a reclamation and not a blackbird.; assump1 -> int1: the dustpan is a kind of a reclamation.; int1 -> int2: the dustpan is either a reclamation or psychogenic or both.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a reclamation or is psychogenic or both.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the sheepherder is not an elastic.; sent4 & sent1 -> int5: the sheepherder is a kind of an elastic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the dustpan is a reclamation and not a blackbird is wrong.; sent5 -> int8: if the fact that the dustpan is monotonic is right then it does mush primer.; __UNKNOWN__