the dimple is not a dissolve and it is not moderating.
sent1: that something is not a dissolve and is not moderating is incorrect if the fact that it is not a absconder hold. sent2: that something fibrillates and it refrains Girondist is incorrect if it is not perceptible. sent3: the mezzotint is a absconder if there exists something such that either it is not tectonic or it is not nonfatal or both. sent4: if something is thermionics but it does not refrain snowboard it is not perceptible. sent5: the dimple is not a absconder if the fact that it does fibrillate and it refrains Girondist is not correct. sent6: the gun is not tectonic or not nonfatal or both. sent7: the Brazilian is not moderating if either something is a absconder or it refrains Girondist or both. sent8: either the gun is not tectonic or it is nonfatal or both. sent9: something is thermionics but it does not refrain snowboard if it does not snarl Ohioan. sent10: the gun does not dissolve.
sent6 -> int1: something is not tectonic and/or is fatal.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the mezzotint is a absconder.; int2 -> int3: that the mezzotint is a kind of a absconder or does refrain Girondist or both is not false.; int3 -> int4: something is a absconder or refrains Girondist or both.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the Brazilian does not moderate.;
that the dimple is both not a dissolve and not moderating is not true.
sent1 -> int6: that the dimple does not dissolve and it does not moderate is not correct if it is not a absconder.; sent2 -> int7: that the dimple fibrillates and refrains Girondist does not hold if it is not perceptible.; sent4 -> int8: the dimple is imperceptible if it is a kind of thermionics thing that does not refrain snowboard.; sent9 -> int9: if the dimple does not snarl Ohioan then it is thermionics and it does not refrain snowboard.;
$hypothesis$ = the dimple is not a dissolve and it is not moderating. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a dissolve and is not moderating is incorrect if the fact that it is not a absconder hold. sent2: that something fibrillates and it refrains Girondist is incorrect if it is not perceptible. sent3: the mezzotint is a absconder if there exists something such that either it is not tectonic or it is not nonfatal or both. sent4: if something is thermionics but it does not refrain snowboard it is not perceptible. sent5: the dimple is not a absconder if the fact that it does fibrillate and it refrains Girondist is not correct. sent6: the gun is not tectonic or not nonfatal or both. sent7: the Brazilian is not moderating if either something is a absconder or it refrains Girondist or both. sent8: either the gun is not tectonic or it is nonfatal or both. sent9: something is thermionics but it does not refrain snowboard if it does not snarl Ohioan. sent10: the gun does not dissolve. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: something is not tectonic and/or is fatal.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the mezzotint is a absconder.; int2 -> int3: that the mezzotint is a kind of a absconder or does refrain Girondist or both is not false.; int3 -> int4: something is a absconder or refrains Girondist or both.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the Brazilian does not moderate.; __UNKNOWN__