the scenarist is a meristem or it is mesonic or both.
sent1: if that the caterer is not a kind of a prophecy is correct then that the scenarist is a meristem and/or it is mesonic does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that it is a grubby and it is a prophecy. sent3: the fact that the scenarist is a prophecy is correct. sent4: the caterer is mesonic or it is bisontine or both. sent5: the transponder is not a endomorph if the fact that the sitter is not an isolation and is not thermionic is false. sent6: the coelogyne is a meristem. sent7: something is bisontine. sent8: that the caterer is a prophecy and is not non-bisontine is not false. sent9: the bounder is a kind of a prophecy if the fact that it is not a prophecy and is a twistwood is wrong. sent10: if the transponder is unripe then the fact that the caterer is non-bisontine but it is a kind of a grubby is wrong. sent11: if there is something such that it is grubby and it is bisontine then the scenarist is a meristem. sent12: if the fact that the caterer is a kind of non-grubby thing that is a bosom is not true it is a grubby. sent13: the sandgrouse is mesonic. sent14: the caterer does gallop and is a gingerbread. sent15: that that the caterer is a kind of a grubby and it bosoms is incorrect is not wrong. sent16: the scenarist is bisontine if the fact that it is not bisontine and it is a meristem does not hold. sent17: something is a meristem that does bosom. sent18: that the vintager is not nonslippery and heaps protamine is not right if the caterer is a prophecy. sent19: if the transponder is not a endomorph it is unripe and it is not a kind of a bosom. sent20: the scenarist is a kind of a concussion. sent21: there is something such that it is a grubby. sent22: the caterer is bisontine if there is something such that it is mesonic thing that is a prophecy.
sent8 -> int1: the caterer is bisontine.;
the fact that the vintager is not nonslippery but it does heap protamine does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the scenarist is a meristem or it is mesonic or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the caterer is not a kind of a prophecy is correct then that the scenarist is a meristem and/or it is mesonic does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that it is a grubby and it is a prophecy. sent3: the fact that the scenarist is a prophecy is correct. sent4: the caterer is mesonic or it is bisontine or both. sent5: the transponder is not a endomorph if the fact that the sitter is not an isolation and is not thermionic is false. sent6: the coelogyne is a meristem. sent7: something is bisontine. sent8: that the caterer is a prophecy and is not non-bisontine is not false. sent9: the bounder is a kind of a prophecy if the fact that it is not a prophecy and is a twistwood is wrong. sent10: if the transponder is unripe then the fact that the caterer is non-bisontine but it is a kind of a grubby is wrong. sent11: if there is something such that it is grubby and it is bisontine then the scenarist is a meristem. sent12: if the fact that the caterer is a kind of non-grubby thing that is a bosom is not true it is a grubby. sent13: the sandgrouse is mesonic. sent14: the caterer does gallop and is a gingerbread. sent15: that that the caterer is a kind of a grubby and it bosoms is incorrect is not wrong. sent16: the scenarist is bisontine if the fact that it is not bisontine and it is a meristem does not hold. sent17: something is a meristem that does bosom. sent18: that the vintager is not nonslippery and heaps protamine is not right if the caterer is a prophecy. sent19: if the transponder is not a endomorph it is unripe and it is not a kind of a bosom. sent20: the scenarist is a kind of a concussion. sent21: there is something such that it is a grubby. sent22: the caterer is bisontine if there is something such that it is mesonic thing that is a prophecy. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the caterer is bisontine.; __UNKNOWN__