the praline does book once-over.
sent1: something that is cacodylic books once-over. sent2: that if the whiff is not a Avestan the praline is not non-brazen and it is cacodylic hold. sent3: if the porgy does not rid Parthenon then that the whiff is not non-Avestan and not non-cacodylic is incorrect. sent4: if something does not book crossword then that it strips dirndl or it is provident or both is false. sent5: if that something strips dirndl and/or is provident is wrong it is not a kind of a domestic. sent6: the porgy is brazen and not a Avestan. sent7: there exists something such that that it is not an extremism and it is not a locator is false. sent8: the flour is a relay if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an extremism and is not a locator is wrong. sent9: if something does book once-over the fact that it does not forward and it is not brazen does not hold. sent10: that the porgy brazens and it is a Avestan does not hold. sent11: the readout does book once-over if the praline is cacodylic. sent12: the Moloch is a kind of a Avestan if the fascist is not a domestic. sent13: if the porgy is a mummy or it is Avestan or both then the whiff is not a Avestan. sent14: the fact that the porgy is both not non-brazen and non-Avestan is wrong if the whiff is not cacodylic. sent15: the whiff is not a Moirai if it is a kind of a Avestan. sent16: something that does brazen is not cacodylic. sent17: if the whiff is not a Avestan that the porgy is a Moirai but it is not brazen is false. sent18: that something smooths but it is not cacodylic does not hold if it does book once-over. sent19: that the whiff is not a Moirai and it does not rid Parthenon is not right if the praline does book once-over. sent20: something is not cacodylic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Moirai and it does not rid Parthenon is not correct. sent21: if the Moloch is a Avestan or it is not stagflationary or both then the porgy is a Avestan.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the praline books once-over.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the whiff is not a kind of a Moirai and it does not rid Parthenon is incorrect.; sent20 -> int2: if that the whiff is not a kind of a Moirai and does not rid Parthenon is false then it is not cacodylic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the whiff is not cacodylic hold.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: that the porgy does brazen but it is not Avestan is incorrect.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the praline does book once-over.
sent1 -> int6: if the praline is cacodylic it does book once-over.; sent5 -> int7: if that the fascist strips dirndl and/or it is provident is false then that it is undomestic hold.; sent4 -> int8: that the fascist does strip dirndl and/or is provident is incorrect if it does not book crossword.; sent7 & sent8 -> int9: the flour relays.; int9 -> int10: the fact that something relays hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the praline does book once-over. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is cacodylic books once-over. sent2: that if the whiff is not a Avestan the praline is not non-brazen and it is cacodylic hold. sent3: if the porgy does not rid Parthenon then that the whiff is not non-Avestan and not non-cacodylic is incorrect. sent4: if something does not book crossword then that it strips dirndl or it is provident or both is false. sent5: if that something strips dirndl and/or is provident is wrong it is not a kind of a domestic. sent6: the porgy is brazen and not a Avestan. sent7: there exists something such that that it is not an extremism and it is not a locator is false. sent8: the flour is a relay if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an extremism and is not a locator is wrong. sent9: if something does book once-over the fact that it does not forward and it is not brazen does not hold. sent10: that the porgy brazens and it is a Avestan does not hold. sent11: the readout does book once-over if the praline is cacodylic. sent12: the Moloch is a kind of a Avestan if the fascist is not a domestic. sent13: if the porgy is a mummy or it is Avestan or both then the whiff is not a Avestan. sent14: the fact that the porgy is both not non-brazen and non-Avestan is wrong if the whiff is not cacodylic. sent15: the whiff is not a Moirai if it is a kind of a Avestan. sent16: something that does brazen is not cacodylic. sent17: if the whiff is not a Avestan that the porgy is a Moirai but it is not brazen is false. sent18: that something smooths but it is not cacodylic does not hold if it does book once-over. sent19: that the whiff is not a Moirai and it does not rid Parthenon is not right if the praline does book once-over. sent20: something is not cacodylic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Moirai and it does not rid Parthenon is not correct. sent21: if the Moloch is a Avestan or it is not stagflationary or both then the porgy is a Avestan. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the praline books once-over.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the whiff is not a kind of a Moirai and it does not rid Parthenon is incorrect.; sent20 -> int2: if that the whiff is not a kind of a Moirai and does not rid Parthenon is false then it is not cacodylic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the whiff is not cacodylic hold.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: that the porgy does brazen but it is not Avestan is incorrect.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__