the wheatear is neurogenic.
sent1: something is neurogenic if it is clayey. sent2: the fact that the alpha-adrenoceptor does not purify label is correct if the fact that the fact that it vaults idolizer and/or it does not scourge Sabbatarian is correct is not right. sent3: if the rift is not neurogenic then the wheatear is not noncritical. sent4: the rift is not neurogenic and is noncritical. sent5: a rational thing is a Nicaraguan. sent6: if the rapporteur is not a kind of a seemliness the rift is a kind of non-geostrategic thing that is noncritical. sent7: the wheatear is non-neurogenic if the rapporteur is both not clayey and not non-neurogenic. sent8: if the alpha-adrenoceptor is not a sediment the fact that either it does vault idolizer or it does not scourge Sabbatarian or both is not correct. sent9: if the rift is not a kind of a seemliness then the fact that the rapporteur is not geostrategic is correct. sent10: the rapporteur is not neurogenic if the rift is a kind of a seemliness. sent11: the rapporteur is non-clayey and neurogenic if the wheatear is not a seemliness. sent12: if the Twin is a Triakidae the rapporteur purifies linnet. sent13: if something that is not geostrategic is noncritical the wheatear is clayey. sent14: there is something such that it is noncritical. sent15: if something that is not neurogenic is a seemliness the rapporteur is noncritical. sent16: the fact that the rapporteur is noncritical hold if it is a kind of a seemliness. sent17: the Twin is a Triakidae. sent18: something is not clayey but it is a roadkill if it does purify linnet.
sent1 -> int1: if the wheatear is clayey it is neurogenic.;
the wheatear is not neurogenic.
sent18 -> int2: if the rapporteur does purify linnet then it is non-clayey thing that is a roadkill.; sent12 & sent17 -> int3: the rapporteur purifies linnet.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the rapporteur is not clayey but it is a roadkill.; int4 -> int5: the rapporteur is not clayey.;
$hypothesis$ = the wheatear is neurogenic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is neurogenic if it is clayey. sent2: the fact that the alpha-adrenoceptor does not purify label is correct if the fact that the fact that it vaults idolizer and/or it does not scourge Sabbatarian is correct is not right. sent3: if the rift is not neurogenic then the wheatear is not noncritical. sent4: the rift is not neurogenic and is noncritical. sent5: a rational thing is a Nicaraguan. sent6: if the rapporteur is not a kind of a seemliness the rift is a kind of non-geostrategic thing that is noncritical. sent7: the wheatear is non-neurogenic if the rapporteur is both not clayey and not non-neurogenic. sent8: if the alpha-adrenoceptor is not a sediment the fact that either it does vault idolizer or it does not scourge Sabbatarian or both is not correct. sent9: if the rift is not a kind of a seemliness then the fact that the rapporteur is not geostrategic is correct. sent10: the rapporteur is not neurogenic if the rift is a kind of a seemliness. sent11: the rapporteur is non-clayey and neurogenic if the wheatear is not a seemliness. sent12: if the Twin is a Triakidae the rapporteur purifies linnet. sent13: if something that is not geostrategic is noncritical the wheatear is clayey. sent14: there is something such that it is noncritical. sent15: if something that is not neurogenic is a seemliness the rapporteur is noncritical. sent16: the fact that the rapporteur is noncritical hold if it is a kind of a seemliness. sent17: the Twin is a Triakidae. sent18: something is not clayey but it is a roadkill if it does purify linnet. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the wheatear is clayey it is neurogenic.; __UNKNOWN__