the fact that the fretting country but not the amblyopicness happens is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the fortifying does not occur and the directorship does not occur is wrong if the catadromousness occurs. sent2: the cupricness does not occur if the adhering Dinesen does not occur. sent3: the lunacy causes that the adhering icicle does not occur and/or that the adhering Dinesen does not occur. sent4: if that either the catadromousness or the fortifying or both happens is false then the directorship does not occur. sent5: the fretting country occurs. sent6: the findings happens and the collusion does not occur. sent7: if the adhering night-line happens or the adhering gramophone does not occur or both then the catadromousness occurs. sent8: if the sawm happens then the reding resignation does not occur and/or the life does not occur. sent9: that both the non-cupricness and the adhering Dinesen occurs prevents the adhering icicle. sent10: if the cupricness does not occur then the fretting country occurs. sent11: if the collusion does not occur then the fortifying does not occur and the directorship does not occur. sent12: the fretting country but not the amblyopicness happens if the cupricness does not occur. sent13: the cupricness occurs if the adhering icicle does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the adhering night-line occurs or the adhering gramophone does not occur or both does not hold the fact that the lunacy occurs is true. sent15: the catadromousness occurs if the adhering night-line happens. sent16: that the adhering icicle does not occur yields the non-cupricness. sent17: the banging does not occur. sent18: that the collusion does not occur brings about that the fortifying does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adhering night-line happens and/or the adhering gramophone does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the catadromousness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the fortifying does not occur and the directorship does not occur is not right.; sent6 -> int3: the collusion does not occur.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: the fortifying does not occur and the directorship does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that either the adhering night-line happens or the adhering gramophone does not occur or both is false.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the lunacy occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the adhering icicle does not occur and/or the adhering Dinesen does not occur.; int8 & sent16 & sent2 -> int9: the cupricness does not occur.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fretting country but not the amblyopicness happens is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fretting country but not the amblyopicness happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fortifying does not occur and the directorship does not occur is wrong if the catadromousness occurs. sent2: the cupricness does not occur if the adhering Dinesen does not occur. sent3: the lunacy causes that the adhering icicle does not occur and/or that the adhering Dinesen does not occur. sent4: if that either the catadromousness or the fortifying or both happens is false then the directorship does not occur. sent5: the fretting country occurs. sent6: the findings happens and the collusion does not occur. sent7: if the adhering night-line happens or the adhering gramophone does not occur or both then the catadromousness occurs. sent8: if the sawm happens then the reding resignation does not occur and/or the life does not occur. sent9: that both the non-cupricness and the adhering Dinesen occurs prevents the adhering icicle. sent10: if the cupricness does not occur then the fretting country occurs. sent11: if the collusion does not occur then the fortifying does not occur and the directorship does not occur. sent12: the fretting country but not the amblyopicness happens if the cupricness does not occur. sent13: the cupricness occurs if the adhering icicle does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the adhering night-line occurs or the adhering gramophone does not occur or both does not hold the fact that the lunacy occurs is true. sent15: the catadromousness occurs if the adhering night-line happens. sent16: that the adhering icicle does not occur yields the non-cupricness. sent17: the banging does not occur. sent18: that the collusion does not occur brings about that the fortifying does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adhering night-line happens and/or the adhering gramophone does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the catadromousness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the fortifying does not occur and the directorship does not occur is not right.; sent6 -> int3: the collusion does not occur.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: the fortifying does not occur and the directorship does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that either the adhering night-line happens or the adhering gramophone does not occur or both is false.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the lunacy occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the adhering icicle does not occur and/or the adhering Dinesen does not occur.; int8 & sent16 & sent2 -> int9: the cupricness does not occur.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__