that there is something such that if it is not uneven then the fact that it does not assume thimerosal and does not testify headspace is false is not wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a gargle the fact that it is not a kind of a balsa and is not reflective is false. sent2: that the repertory does not assume thimerosal and does not testify headspace is wrong if it is uneven. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a coprolith then the fact that it is not a Luxemburger and testifies pax is not right. sent4: the repertory is not an underdevelopment and it is not autacoidal if it is not uneven. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not testify repertory then the fact that it is determinate and it is not a Zambian is not true. sent6: if the repertory is not uneven it does not assume thimerosal and it does not testify headspace. sent7: if the adhesion is not infelicitous that it is both not a four-in-hand and not a Vespidae does not hold. sent8: that something does not testify headspace and it does not slight does not hold if it is not an old. sent9: that the repertory does not assume thimerosal but it testifies headspace is false if it is not uneven. sent10: the fact that the repertory does not assume thimerosal and it does not testify headspace is wrong if it is not uneven. sent11: there is something such that if it is uneven then that it does not assume thimerosal and does not testify headspace is wrong. sent12: that the fact that the disguise assumes Brasilia but it is not unpreventable is true does not hold if it does not assume thimerosal. sent13: the fact that something is not a fencing and it does not testify repertory is not true if it does not assume thimerosal. sent14: that there is something such that if it is not uneven then that it does not assume thimerosal and does testify headspace is not right is true. sent15: if the repertory is not a kind of a Hollywood the fact that it is both not a cover and not uneven does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a hryvnia it is not sacramental and it is not autodidactic. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not uneven then that the fact that it assumes thimerosal and does not testify headspace is right is not correct. sent18: the fact that the repertory assumes thimerosal but it does not testify headspace is wrong if it is not uneven. sent19: there is something such that if that it is not uneven is not false it does not assume thimerosal and does not testify headspace. sent20: if the breechloader does not spend oast then it is a kind of non-accipitrine thing that is not uneven.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
that that the fjord does not testify headspace and it does not slight is incorrect if the fjord is not an old is not false.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not uneven then the fact that it does not assume thimerosal and does not testify headspace is false is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a gargle the fact that it is not a kind of a balsa and is not reflective is false. sent2: that the repertory does not assume thimerosal and does not testify headspace is wrong if it is uneven. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a coprolith then the fact that it is not a Luxemburger and testifies pax is not right. sent4: the repertory is not an underdevelopment and it is not autacoidal if it is not uneven. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not testify repertory then the fact that it is determinate and it is not a Zambian is not true. sent6: if the repertory is not uneven it does not assume thimerosal and it does not testify headspace. sent7: if the adhesion is not infelicitous that it is both not a four-in-hand and not a Vespidae does not hold. sent8: that something does not testify headspace and it does not slight does not hold if it is not an old. sent9: that the repertory does not assume thimerosal but it testifies headspace is false if it is not uneven. sent10: the fact that the repertory does not assume thimerosal and it does not testify headspace is wrong if it is not uneven. sent11: there is something such that if it is uneven then that it does not assume thimerosal and does not testify headspace is wrong. sent12: that the fact that the disguise assumes Brasilia but it is not unpreventable is true does not hold if it does not assume thimerosal. sent13: the fact that something is not a fencing and it does not testify repertory is not true if it does not assume thimerosal. sent14: that there is something such that if it is not uneven then that it does not assume thimerosal and does testify headspace is not right is true. sent15: if the repertory is not a kind of a Hollywood the fact that it is both not a cover and not uneven does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a hryvnia it is not sacramental and it is not autodidactic. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not uneven then that the fact that it assumes thimerosal and does not testify headspace is right is not correct. sent18: the fact that the repertory assumes thimerosal but it does not testify headspace is wrong if it is not uneven. sent19: there is something such that if that it is not uneven is not false it does not assume thimerosal and does not testify headspace. sent20: if the breechloader does not spend oast then it is a kind of non-accipitrine thing that is not uneven. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__