not the Mark but the externalization occurs.
sent1: the phrenologicalness and the yelling occurs. sent2: the Mark causes that the sputtering administrator occurs but the lipectomy does not occur. sent3: the fact that the spirited does not occur is not false. sent4: the wholesaling does not occur. sent5: that the Eurocentricness happens is prevented by that the sputtering administrator and the tuberousness happens. sent6: both the Eurocentricness and the benedictoriness occurs. sent7: the tuberousness occurs and the cordlessness occurs if the wholesaling does not occur. sent8: the externalization occurs if the fact that the Aether happens hold. sent9: that the spirited does not occur triggers either that the coarseness happens or that the Aether occurs or both. sent10: the fact that the externalization occurs is not false if the coarseness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mark occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the sputtering administrator happens but the lipectomy does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the sputtering administrator happens.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the tuberousness happens and the cordlessness occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the tuberousness happens is right.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the sputtering administrator occurs and the tuberousness happens.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the Eurocentricness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int7: the Eurocentricness happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Mark does not occur.; sent9 & sent3 -> int10: the coarseness occurs or the Aether occurs or both.; int10 & sent10 & sent8 -> int11: the externalization occurs.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = not the Mark but the externalization occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the phrenologicalness and the yelling occurs. sent2: the Mark causes that the sputtering administrator occurs but the lipectomy does not occur. sent3: the fact that the spirited does not occur is not false. sent4: the wholesaling does not occur. sent5: that the Eurocentricness happens is prevented by that the sputtering administrator and the tuberousness happens. sent6: both the Eurocentricness and the benedictoriness occurs. sent7: the tuberousness occurs and the cordlessness occurs if the wholesaling does not occur. sent8: the externalization occurs if the fact that the Aether happens hold. sent9: that the spirited does not occur triggers either that the coarseness happens or that the Aether occurs or both. sent10: the fact that the externalization occurs is not false if the coarseness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mark occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the sputtering administrator happens but the lipectomy does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the sputtering administrator happens.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the tuberousness happens and the cordlessness occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the tuberousness happens is right.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the sputtering administrator occurs and the tuberousness happens.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the Eurocentricness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int7: the Eurocentricness happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Mark does not occur.; sent9 & sent3 -> int10: the coarseness occurs or the Aether occurs or both.; int10 & sent10 & sent8 -> int11: the externalization occurs.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__