the fact that the fact that the Miss is not a kind of a blaring is not false if the Hussite does communicate processed is incorrect.
sent1: if that that something is not an ironing and/or is not consolable is true is not correct it is not a climber. sent2: the Hussite does spray tempera if the fact that the trainbandsman is not a kind of a Ehrlich but it skydives does not hold. sent3: if that something is postmillennial and it sprays pike is false it is not postmillennial. sent4: the Miss is not a blaring if the dungeon is not a kind of a Ehrlich. sent5: if there is something such that it is a Ehrlich then that the Hussite does not spray Ichthyosauridae and/or does not skydive is not right. sent6: the fact that the Hussite does not communicate processed and/or is not a blaring is incorrect. sent7: the nonpareil is a blaring that is a kind of a photosensitivity if it is not postmillennial. sent8: if the Hussite sprays tempera the Miss sprays tempera. sent9: the dungeon does spray Ichthyosauridae. sent10: the mayoress is not a kind of a blaring. sent11: that the sulindac is a kind of a creepiness is not false. sent12: if the fact that something does not spray Ichthyosauridae or it does not skydive or both does not hold then it does not communicate processed. sent13: if there exists something such that it is a creepiness then the fact that the nonpareil is postmillennial and it sprays pike is not correct. sent14: the rounders does not communicate processed if something is a blaring. sent15: the fact that the trainbandsman is not a Ehrlich and skydives is wrong if the microfiche does not spray Ichthyosauridae.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dungeon is a kind of a Ehrlich.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a kind of a Ehrlich.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the Hussite either does not spray Ichthyosauridae or does not skydive or both is wrong.; sent12 -> int3: the Hussite does not communicate processed if that it does not spray Ichthyosauridae and/or it does not skydive is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Hussite does not communicate processed.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Hussite does communicate processed.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the dungeon is not a Ehrlich.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the Miss is not a blaring.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Miss sprays tempera.
sent3 -> int8: if the fact that the nonpareil is postmillennial and it does spray pike does not hold it is postmillennial.; sent11 -> int9: there is something such that it is a creepiness.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: that the nonpareil is postmillennial and does spray pike does not hold.; int8 & int10 -> int11: that the nonpareil is not postmillennial hold.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the nonpareil is a blaring and it is a photosensitivity.; int12 -> int13: that the nonpareil is a blaring is not false.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is a blaring.; int14 & sent14 -> int15: the rounders does not communicate processed.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it does not communicate processed.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the Miss is not a kind of a blaring is not false if the Hussite does communicate processed is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that something is not an ironing and/or is not consolable is true is not correct it is not a climber. sent2: the Hussite does spray tempera if the fact that the trainbandsman is not a kind of a Ehrlich but it skydives does not hold. sent3: if that something is postmillennial and it sprays pike is false it is not postmillennial. sent4: the Miss is not a blaring if the dungeon is not a kind of a Ehrlich. sent5: if there is something such that it is a Ehrlich then that the Hussite does not spray Ichthyosauridae and/or does not skydive is not right. sent6: the fact that the Hussite does not communicate processed and/or is not a blaring is incorrect. sent7: the nonpareil is a blaring that is a kind of a photosensitivity if it is not postmillennial. sent8: if the Hussite sprays tempera the Miss sprays tempera. sent9: the dungeon does spray Ichthyosauridae. sent10: the mayoress is not a kind of a blaring. sent11: that the sulindac is a kind of a creepiness is not false. sent12: if the fact that something does not spray Ichthyosauridae or it does not skydive or both does not hold then it does not communicate processed. sent13: if there exists something such that it is a creepiness then the fact that the nonpareil is postmillennial and it sprays pike is not correct. sent14: the rounders does not communicate processed if something is a blaring. sent15: the fact that the trainbandsman is not a Ehrlich and skydives is wrong if the microfiche does not spray Ichthyosauridae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dungeon is a kind of a Ehrlich.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a kind of a Ehrlich.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the Hussite either does not spray Ichthyosauridae or does not skydive or both is wrong.; sent12 -> int3: the Hussite does not communicate processed if that it does not spray Ichthyosauridae and/or it does not skydive is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Hussite does not communicate processed.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Hussite does communicate processed.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the dungeon is not a Ehrlich.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the Miss is not a blaring.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__