that if the fact that the vigesimalness does not occur is true the fact that the phreaticness does not occur and/or the auditioning does not occur is false is not correct.
sent1: that both the jamming refresher and the non-chertiness happens brings about that the paddling happens. sent2: if the scholarliness does not occur then the auditioning occurs. sent3: the ossicularness happens. sent4: the masking misoneism occurs if the cancan occurs and the crying does not occur. sent5: that the plication does not occur and/or the jamming jabiru does not occur is brought about by that the conquest does not occur. sent6: the masking novelization does not occur. sent7: the scholarliness does not occur if the fact that the cancan occurs but the crying does not occur is false. sent8: the fact that the jamming oeuvre occurs but the eleven-plus does not occur is not correct. sent9: the fact that that the phreaticness does not occur and/or the auditioning does not occur is not true is not wrong if the scholarliness does not occur. sent10: if the lymphocyticness does not occur then that the high-energiness occurs or the recriminating does not occur or both is incorrect. sent11: if that the embrowning Aphriza does not occur is not false that either the titillation occurs or the interlocking does not occur or both is not correct. sent12: if that the vigesimalness occurs is not true then the phreaticness does not occur and/or the audition does not occur. sent13: the sensoriness does not occur. sent14: the piping does not occur. sent15: the rule does not occur. sent16: that the recoverableness does not occur hold. sent17: the interlock does not occur. sent18: if the masking misoneism occurs the vigesimalness occurs. sent19: the anastigmaticness happens. sent20: the masking father-in-law does not occur if the jamming raisin occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cancan but not the crying happens.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the masking misoneism happens.; sent18 & int1 -> int2: the vigesimalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vigesimalness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the cancan but not the crying occurs does not hold.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: that the scholarliness does not occur hold.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: that the phreaticness does not occur or the audition does not occur or both is wrong.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the vigesimalness does not occur is true the fact that the phreaticness does not occur and/or the auditioning does not occur is false is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the jamming refresher and the non-chertiness happens brings about that the paddling happens. sent2: if the scholarliness does not occur then the auditioning occurs. sent3: the ossicularness happens. sent4: the masking misoneism occurs if the cancan occurs and the crying does not occur. sent5: that the plication does not occur and/or the jamming jabiru does not occur is brought about by that the conquest does not occur. sent6: the masking novelization does not occur. sent7: the scholarliness does not occur if the fact that the cancan occurs but the crying does not occur is false. sent8: the fact that the jamming oeuvre occurs but the eleven-plus does not occur is not correct. sent9: the fact that that the phreaticness does not occur and/or the auditioning does not occur is not true is not wrong if the scholarliness does not occur. sent10: if the lymphocyticness does not occur then that the high-energiness occurs or the recriminating does not occur or both is incorrect. sent11: if that the embrowning Aphriza does not occur is not false that either the titillation occurs or the interlocking does not occur or both is not correct. sent12: if that the vigesimalness occurs is not true then the phreaticness does not occur and/or the audition does not occur. sent13: the sensoriness does not occur. sent14: the piping does not occur. sent15: the rule does not occur. sent16: that the recoverableness does not occur hold. sent17: the interlock does not occur. sent18: if the masking misoneism occurs the vigesimalness occurs. sent19: the anastigmaticness happens. sent20: the masking father-in-law does not occur if the jamming raisin occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cancan but not the crying happens.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the masking misoneism happens.; sent18 & int1 -> int2: the vigesimalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vigesimalness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the cancan but not the crying occurs does not hold.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: that the scholarliness does not occur hold.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: that the phreaticness does not occur or the audition does not occur or both is wrong.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__