the doctoring conk occurs or the doctoring earful does not occur or both.
sent1: the slip happens. sent2: that the magic does not occur leads to the non-bicapsularness. sent3: the foreshowing Xenosauridae happens if both the differentiation and the non-bicapsularness occurs. sent4: that the restrictiveness but not the quantization occurs is brought about by the non-disreputableness. sent5: that the hypothecating one-third happens and/or the assignment does not occur is right. sent6: the differentiation happens and the bicapsularness does not occur if the magic does not occur. sent7: the doctoring unskillfulness does not occur. sent8: the photoelectricness does not occur. sent9: the psychotherapy does not occur. sent10: that the reimposition but not the Lutheranness happens causes that the hypothecating banging occurs. sent11: that the differentiation does not occur and the bicapsularness does not occur is brought about by that the magic occurs. sent12: the acapnicness does not occur. sent13: if the doctoring earful happens then the aggro does not occur and the foreshowing Xenosauridae does not occur. sent14: if the differentiation does not occur then the fact that either the doctoring conk occurs or the doctoring earful does not occur or both is not right. sent15: that the fiduciariness happens is brought about by that the spot-welding occurs but the tragedy does not occur. sent16: the mastoidness does not occur if that the doctoring conk does not occur and the differentiation occurs is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the doctoring earful happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the aggro does not occur and the foreshowing Xenosauridae does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the foreshowing Xenosauridae does not occur.;
that either the doctoring conk happens or the doctoring earful does not occur or both is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the doctoring conk occurs or the doctoring earful does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the slip happens. sent2: that the magic does not occur leads to the non-bicapsularness. sent3: the foreshowing Xenosauridae happens if both the differentiation and the non-bicapsularness occurs. sent4: that the restrictiveness but not the quantization occurs is brought about by the non-disreputableness. sent5: that the hypothecating one-third happens and/or the assignment does not occur is right. sent6: the differentiation happens and the bicapsularness does not occur if the magic does not occur. sent7: the doctoring unskillfulness does not occur. sent8: the photoelectricness does not occur. sent9: the psychotherapy does not occur. sent10: that the reimposition but not the Lutheranness happens causes that the hypothecating banging occurs. sent11: that the differentiation does not occur and the bicapsularness does not occur is brought about by that the magic occurs. sent12: the acapnicness does not occur. sent13: if the doctoring earful happens then the aggro does not occur and the foreshowing Xenosauridae does not occur. sent14: if the differentiation does not occur then the fact that either the doctoring conk occurs or the doctoring earful does not occur or both is not right. sent15: that the fiduciariness happens is brought about by that the spot-welding occurs but the tragedy does not occur. sent16: the mastoidness does not occur if that the doctoring conk does not occur and the differentiation occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the doctoring earful happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the aggro does not occur and the foreshowing Xenosauridae does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the foreshowing Xenosauridae does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__