if the popgun is anabiotic the jail is auscultatory.
sent1: something that does not become incinerator and is not instructional is not auscultatory. sent2: something does become incinerator if it is organismal. sent3: if the popgun is anabiotic then the terreplein is organismal. sent4: the jail does not become incinerator and it is not instructional if the fact that the terreplein does become incinerator is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the popgun is anabiotic.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the terreplein is organismal.; sent2 -> int2: if the terreplein is organismal it becomes incinerator.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the terreplein becomes incinerator.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the jail does not become incinerator and it is not instructional.; sent1 -> int5: the fact that the jail is auscultatory is true if it does not become incinerator and is not instructional.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the jail is auscultatory.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the popgun is anabiotic the jail is auscultatory. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not become incinerator and is not instructional is not auscultatory. sent2: something does become incinerator if it is organismal. sent3: if the popgun is anabiotic then the terreplein is organismal. sent4: the jail does not become incinerator and it is not instructional if the fact that the terreplein does become incinerator is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the popgun is anabiotic.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the terreplein is organismal.; sent2 -> int2: if the terreplein is organismal it becomes incinerator.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the terreplein becomes incinerator.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the jail does not become incinerator and it is not instructional.; sent1 -> int5: the fact that the jail is auscultatory is true if it does not become incinerator and is not instructional.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the jail is auscultatory.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__