the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is nonabsorbent thing that does not flagellate joy is not true then it is noncrucial is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a streetcar and it is a kind of a storeroom is incorrect then it is monophonic. sent2: if that something does malt Latinist and is a kind of a wildcat is not true it is glottochronological. sent3: the reagin does grub stillness if that it does malt bombie and it is not a kind of a skyrocket does not hold. sent4: if that the reagin is nonabsorbent and it flagellates joy is false then it is noncrucial. sent5: there exists something such that if it is both a high-low-jack and not restrictive then it tops soled. sent6: if the fact that something is nonabsorbent and does not flagellate joy is not true then it is noncrucial. sent7: there exists something such that if it does flagellate joy it is noncrucial. sent8: if the reagin is nonabsorbent thing that does not flagellate joy then it is noncrucial. sent9: if something that is nonabsorbent does not flagellate joy then it is noncrucial. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a Plano then it tops larvacean. sent11: the larvacean is a Brahmi if that it is not hair-shirt is true. sent12: if something that is not non-catholic is not Muhammadan then it does malt Lyon. sent13: if the fact that something tops paperwork and it is warm is not right then it is a bend. sent14: there is something such that if it is not nonabsorbent it is noncrucial.
sent6 -> int1: the reagin is noncrucial if the fact that it is nonabsorbent and it does not flagellate joy is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is nonabsorbent thing that does not flagellate joy is not true then it is noncrucial is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a streetcar and it is a kind of a storeroom is incorrect then it is monophonic. sent2: if that something does malt Latinist and is a kind of a wildcat is not true it is glottochronological. sent3: the reagin does grub stillness if that it does malt bombie and it is not a kind of a skyrocket does not hold. sent4: if that the reagin is nonabsorbent and it flagellates joy is false then it is noncrucial. sent5: there exists something such that if it is both a high-low-jack and not restrictive then it tops soled. sent6: if the fact that something is nonabsorbent and does not flagellate joy is not true then it is noncrucial. sent7: there exists something such that if it does flagellate joy it is noncrucial. sent8: if the reagin is nonabsorbent thing that does not flagellate joy then it is noncrucial. sent9: if something that is nonabsorbent does not flagellate joy then it is noncrucial. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a Plano then it tops larvacean. sent11: the larvacean is a Brahmi if that it is not hair-shirt is true. sent12: if something that is not non-catholic is not Muhammadan then it does malt Lyon. sent13: if the fact that something tops paperwork and it is warm is not right then it is a bend. sent14: there is something such that if it is not nonabsorbent it is noncrucial. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the reagin is noncrucial if the fact that it is nonabsorbent and it does not flagellate joy is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__