the fact that if the conformation is not senatorial then that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and is not a newt is not right is incorrect.
sent1: the hive is not senatorial. sent2: there is something such that it is desirable. sent3: the fact that the drink is both not incurable and not anthropogenetic is not correct. sent4: that the conformation is not immaterial but it is surficial is not right. sent5: if something that does not dominate is not desirable it does not uplift Tennessean. sent6: if something does not dwarf conformation and it is not senatorial then it does not uplift carbuncle. sent7: if something is non-desirable thing that does not dwarf conformation it is not senatorial. sent8: the fact that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and is a newt is not correct if the conformation does uplift Bangkok. sent9: the conformation is not a kind of a newt. sent10: the fact that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and is a kind of a newt is wrong if the conformation is not senatorial. sent11: something that does not uplift carbuncle is monocarboxylic and uplifts Bangkok. sent12: if something is not undesirable then the conformation does not dwarf conformation. sent13: if the conformation is not monocarboxylic then the fact that the drink does uplift Bangkok and is not senatorial is not true. sent14: if the conformation does uplift Bangkok that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and it is not a newt does not hold. sent15: if the conformation is senatorial the fact that the drink does not uplift carbuncle and it is not monocarboxylic is not true.
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the conformation does not dwarf conformation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conformation is not senatorial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the conformation does not dwarf conformation and it is non-senatorial.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the conformation does not uplift carbuncle if the conformation does not dwarf conformation and it is not senatorial is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the conformation does not uplift carbuncle.; sent11 -> int5: the conformation is not non-monocarboxylic and it does uplift Bangkok if it does not uplift carbuncle.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the conformation is monocarboxylic and it does uplift Bangkok.; int6 -> int7: the conformation does uplift Bangkok.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: that that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and it is not a kind of a newt does not hold hold.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the phytochemist is not senatorial.
sent7 -> int9: if the phytochemist is a kind of non-desirable thing that does not dwarf conformation then it is not senatorial.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the conformation is not senatorial then that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and is not a newt is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the hive is not senatorial. sent2: there is something such that it is desirable. sent3: the fact that the drink is both not incurable and not anthropogenetic is not correct. sent4: that the conformation is not immaterial but it is surficial is not right. sent5: if something that does not dominate is not desirable it does not uplift Tennessean. sent6: if something does not dwarf conformation and it is not senatorial then it does not uplift carbuncle. sent7: if something is non-desirable thing that does not dwarf conformation it is not senatorial. sent8: the fact that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and is a newt is not correct if the conformation does uplift Bangkok. sent9: the conformation is not a kind of a newt. sent10: the fact that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and is a kind of a newt is wrong if the conformation is not senatorial. sent11: something that does not uplift carbuncle is monocarboxylic and uplifts Bangkok. sent12: if something is not undesirable then the conformation does not dwarf conformation. sent13: if the conformation is not monocarboxylic then the fact that the drink does uplift Bangkok and is not senatorial is not true. sent14: if the conformation does uplift Bangkok that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and it is not a newt does not hold. sent15: if the conformation is senatorial the fact that the drink does not uplift carbuncle and it is not monocarboxylic is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the conformation does not dwarf conformation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conformation is not senatorial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the conformation does not dwarf conformation and it is non-senatorial.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the conformation does not uplift carbuncle if the conformation does not dwarf conformation and it is not senatorial is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the conformation does not uplift carbuncle.; sent11 -> int5: the conformation is not non-monocarboxylic and it does uplift Bangkok if it does not uplift carbuncle.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the conformation is monocarboxylic and it does uplift Bangkok.; int6 -> int7: the conformation does uplift Bangkok.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: that that the drink does not uplift Bangkok and it is not a kind of a newt does not hold hold.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__