that the call-back is both not a commination and not Piagetian does not hold.
sent1: the down does not confabulate but it is a kind of a humanist if that it is Piagetian is not incorrect. sent2: the GP is not nonfatal. sent3: if that the call-back is Piagetian and it is a kind of a humanist is not true then it does not confabulate. sent4: if that something is a humanist but it does not confabulate is not right then it is not determinable. sent5: if something is not humanist it is not a commination. sent6: if the down is determinable and/or confabulates the perturbation is not a humanist. sent7: if the down does not confabulate then that the call-back is Epicurean and confabulate is incorrect. sent8: something is not Piagetian if it does not confabulate. sent9: the perturbation is a humanist if the GP is not nonfatal. sent10: the fact that the GP is a recall and is not a Yangon does not hold. sent11: if the down is determinable the perturbation is not humanist. sent12: if the down is not nonfatal the GP is determinable. sent13: that the fact that the GP is not a shirtfront but it is the asynergy is not true if the GP is a rightness is correct. sent14: the call-back is not Piagetian if it does not confabulate. sent15: the fact that the down is a humanist and does not confabulate is wrong if the perturbation is Epicurean. sent16: something is nonfatal and it is Epicurean if it is not a asynergy. sent17: the fact that if something is Epicurean then it is Piagetian hold. sent18: if that something is Epicurean and does confabulate does not hold then that it is not Piagetian is not false. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a shirtfront and it is a kind of a asynergy is not correct the perturbation is not a asynergy. sent20: the perturbation confabulates. sent21: if the fact that the GP recalls but it is not a Yangon does not hold it is a kind of a rightness. sent22: the call-back is not a commination.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the down does confabulate.; assump1 -> int1: the down is determinable or it does confabulate or both.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the perturbation is not a kind of a humanist.; sent9 & sent2 -> int3: the perturbation is a kind of a humanist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the down does not confabulate hold.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the call-back is Epicurean and it confabulates is not right.; sent18 -> int7: if the fact that the call-back is Epicurean and does confabulate is incorrect it is not Piagetian.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the call-back is not Piagetian.; int8 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the perturbation is not determinable.
sent17 -> int9: if the down is Epicurean then it is Piagetian.;
$hypothesis$ = that the call-back is both not a commination and not Piagetian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the down does not confabulate but it is a kind of a humanist if that it is Piagetian is not incorrect. sent2: the GP is not nonfatal. sent3: if that the call-back is Piagetian and it is a kind of a humanist is not true then it does not confabulate. sent4: if that something is a humanist but it does not confabulate is not right then it is not determinable. sent5: if something is not humanist it is not a commination. sent6: if the down is determinable and/or confabulates the perturbation is not a humanist. sent7: if the down does not confabulate then that the call-back is Epicurean and confabulate is incorrect. sent8: something is not Piagetian if it does not confabulate. sent9: the perturbation is a humanist if the GP is not nonfatal. sent10: the fact that the GP is a recall and is not a Yangon does not hold. sent11: if the down is determinable the perturbation is not humanist. sent12: if the down is not nonfatal the GP is determinable. sent13: that the fact that the GP is not a shirtfront but it is the asynergy is not true if the GP is a rightness is correct. sent14: the call-back is not Piagetian if it does not confabulate. sent15: the fact that the down is a humanist and does not confabulate is wrong if the perturbation is Epicurean. sent16: something is nonfatal and it is Epicurean if it is not a asynergy. sent17: the fact that if something is Epicurean then it is Piagetian hold. sent18: if that something is Epicurean and does confabulate does not hold then that it is not Piagetian is not false. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a shirtfront and it is a kind of a asynergy is not correct the perturbation is not a asynergy. sent20: the perturbation confabulates. sent21: if the fact that the GP recalls but it is not a Yangon does not hold it is a kind of a rightness. sent22: the call-back is not a commination. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the down does confabulate.; assump1 -> int1: the down is determinable or it does confabulate or both.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the perturbation is not a kind of a humanist.; sent9 & sent2 -> int3: the perturbation is a kind of a humanist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the down does not confabulate hold.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the call-back is Epicurean and it confabulates is not right.; sent18 -> int7: if the fact that the call-back is Epicurean and does confabulate is incorrect it is not Piagetian.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the call-back is not Piagetian.; int8 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__