the pantograph is a 1840s but it is not a kind of a warlock.
sent1: if something is indispensable that it is a 1840s and it is a warlock is incorrect. sent2: something is a 1840s but it is not a warlock if it is unsatisfactory. sent3: the fact that the cloudiness does malinger simpleton but it is not a kind of a 1840s does not hold if it is indispensable. sent4: the cloudiness is satisfactory. sent5: the cloudiness is indispensable if it is not a ELISA and it malingers Gloucestershire. sent6: that the Vernier is indispensable hold. sent7: if something malingers simpleton then it is hydrodynamics. sent8: that the pantograph is a kind of a 1840s that is a warlock is not true. sent9: the cloudiness is not unsatisfactory but it does malinger simpleton. sent10: if that the cloudiness is hydrodynamics is not false the pantograph is indispensable. sent11: that the cloudiness is unsatisfactory and is not a 1840s is wrong if it is hydrodynamics. sent12: that something is a 1840s and is not a warlock is wrong if it is indispensable. sent13: that something is not hydrodynamics but it does malinger simpleton is incorrect if it is indispensable.
sent9 -> int1: the cloudiness malingers simpleton.; sent7 -> int2: the cloudiness is hydrodynamics if it malingers simpleton.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cloudiness is hydrodynamics.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the pantograph is indispensable.; sent12 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the pantograph is a 1840s but it is not a warlock is not right is not false if it is indispensable.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pantograph is a 1840s but it is not a kind of a warlock is correct.
sent2 -> int6: if the pantograph is unsatisfactory then it is a 1840s and not a warlock.; sent13 -> int7: if the cloudiness is indispensable that it is not hydrodynamics and it malingers simpleton is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the pantograph is a 1840s but it is not a kind of a warlock. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is indispensable that it is a 1840s and it is a warlock is incorrect. sent2: something is a 1840s but it is not a warlock if it is unsatisfactory. sent3: the fact that the cloudiness does malinger simpleton but it is not a kind of a 1840s does not hold if it is indispensable. sent4: the cloudiness is satisfactory. sent5: the cloudiness is indispensable if it is not a ELISA and it malingers Gloucestershire. sent6: that the Vernier is indispensable hold. sent7: if something malingers simpleton then it is hydrodynamics. sent8: that the pantograph is a kind of a 1840s that is a warlock is not true. sent9: the cloudiness is not unsatisfactory but it does malinger simpleton. sent10: if that the cloudiness is hydrodynamics is not false the pantograph is indispensable. sent11: that the cloudiness is unsatisfactory and is not a 1840s is wrong if it is hydrodynamics. sent12: that something is a 1840s and is not a warlock is wrong if it is indispensable. sent13: that something is not hydrodynamics but it does malinger simpleton is incorrect if it is indispensable. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the cloudiness malingers simpleton.; sent7 -> int2: the cloudiness is hydrodynamics if it malingers simpleton.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cloudiness is hydrodynamics.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the pantograph is indispensable.; sent12 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the pantograph is a 1840s but it is not a warlock is not right is not false if it is indispensable.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__