the consul does gall pathology.
sent1: if the Medoc is a kind of a Shute but it is not a Cynara then the demantoid is not a kind of a branching. sent2: the coagulase is not a plage. sent3: if there exists something such that it does tilt then the Medoc is a Shute but not a Cynara. sent4: if something tilts then it does gall pathology. sent5: the breadfruit branches if it is a kind of a Shute that is not alliaceous. sent6: if the demantoid is a Pathan then the fact that the Medoc does not branch and it is not a kind of a Cynara is incorrect. sent7: if the breadfruit is not anamorphic and does not gall invalidator it is alliaceous. sent8: something that is a kind of a plage is a Pathan. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is not a branching and it is not a kind of a Cynara is not right the breadfruit is a Cynara. sent10: if the fact that the breadfruit is not anamorphic and it does not gall invalidator is not true then the consul does not gall pathology. sent11: something is a tilt if that it is not alliaceous and/or it is a Shute is not right. sent12: if the fact that the coagulase is a plage is not incorrect then the demantoid is a plage. sent13: the coagulase is a plage and/or redeploys anaplasty if the stumblebum is not cheap. sent14: if the coagulase does redeploy anaplasty the demantoid is a plage. sent15: the cannon does not redeploy searobin. sent16: if the fact that something does not board saprolite and it is not a statistics is not correct then it is not cheap. sent17: if something is not a tilt then the fact that it is not a Novosibirsk and it is not a Pathan is incorrect. sent18: that the stumblebum does not board saprolite and it is not a statistics is not right if there exists something such that that it does not redeploy searobin is correct. sent19: something is a kind of a tilt if it is alliaceous. sent20: the demantoid is a branching and it is a Pathan if the coagulase is not a plage.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the breadfruit is a kind of non-anamorphic thing that does not gall invalidator.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the breadfruit is alliaceous.; sent19 -> int2: the fact that if the breadfruit is not non-alliaceous the breadfruit is a tilt is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the breadfruit does tilt.; int3 -> int4: something tilts.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the Medoc is a kind of a Shute but it is not a Cynara.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the demantoid is not a branching.; sent20 & sent2 -> int7: the demantoid does branch and it is a kind of a Pathan.; int7 -> int8: that the demantoid is a branching is not incorrect.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the breadfruit is non-anamorphic thing that does not gall invalidator is not right.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the consul galls pathology.
sent4 -> int11: if the consul does tilt then it galls pathology.; sent11 -> int12: if the fact that the consul is not alliaceous and/or it is a kind of a Shute does not hold then it does tilt.; sent8 -> int13: if the demantoid is a plage it is a Pathan.; sent16 -> int14: the stumblebum is not cheap if that it does not board saprolite and it is not a statistics is false.; sent15 -> int15: there is something such that it does not redeploy searobin.; int15 & sent18 -> int16: that the stumblebum does not board saprolite and it is not a statistics does not hold.; int14 & int16 -> int17: the stumblebum is not cheap.; sent13 & int17 -> int18: either the coagulase is a kind of a plage or it redeploys anaplasty or both.; int18 & sent12 & sent14 -> int19: the demantoid is a kind of a plage.; int13 & int19 -> int20: the demantoid is a Pathan.; sent6 & int20 -> int21: that the Medoc is not a branching and it is not a Cynara is incorrect.; int21 -> int22: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a branching and not a Cynara is wrong.; int22 & sent9 -> int23: the breadfruit is a kind of a Cynara.; int23 -> int24: something is a Cynara.;
$hypothesis$ = the consul does gall pathology. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Medoc is a kind of a Shute but it is not a Cynara then the demantoid is not a kind of a branching. sent2: the coagulase is not a plage. sent3: if there exists something such that it does tilt then the Medoc is a Shute but not a Cynara. sent4: if something tilts then it does gall pathology. sent5: the breadfruit branches if it is a kind of a Shute that is not alliaceous. sent6: if the demantoid is a Pathan then the fact that the Medoc does not branch and it is not a kind of a Cynara is incorrect. sent7: if the breadfruit is not anamorphic and does not gall invalidator it is alliaceous. sent8: something that is a kind of a plage is a Pathan. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is not a branching and it is not a kind of a Cynara is not right the breadfruit is a Cynara. sent10: if the fact that the breadfruit is not anamorphic and it does not gall invalidator is not true then the consul does not gall pathology. sent11: something is a tilt if that it is not alliaceous and/or it is a Shute is not right. sent12: if the fact that the coagulase is a plage is not incorrect then the demantoid is a plage. sent13: the coagulase is a plage and/or redeploys anaplasty if the stumblebum is not cheap. sent14: if the coagulase does redeploy anaplasty the demantoid is a plage. sent15: the cannon does not redeploy searobin. sent16: if the fact that something does not board saprolite and it is not a statistics is not correct then it is not cheap. sent17: if something is not a tilt then the fact that it is not a Novosibirsk and it is not a Pathan is incorrect. sent18: that the stumblebum does not board saprolite and it is not a statistics is not right if there exists something such that that it does not redeploy searobin is correct. sent19: something is a kind of a tilt if it is alliaceous. sent20: the demantoid is a branching and it is a Pathan if the coagulase is not a plage. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the breadfruit is a kind of non-anamorphic thing that does not gall invalidator.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the breadfruit is alliaceous.; sent19 -> int2: the fact that if the breadfruit is not non-alliaceous the breadfruit is a tilt is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the breadfruit does tilt.; int3 -> int4: something tilts.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the Medoc is a kind of a Shute but it is not a Cynara.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the demantoid is not a branching.; sent20 & sent2 -> int7: the demantoid does branch and it is a kind of a Pathan.; int7 -> int8: that the demantoid is a branching is not incorrect.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the breadfruit is non-anamorphic thing that does not gall invalidator is not right.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__