the restharrow is not on-the-job.
sent1: that that that the absolver is non-haploid a tobramycin is right does not hold hold if the paramecium is not on-the-job. sent2: the absolver is not a kind of a tobramycin if that the underlip is both non-haploid and a ullage is not right. sent3: the absolver is not a ullage if it is not a caroche and is a haploid. sent4: if that the absolver is not a conserve is not false then the fact that the paramecium is a tobramycin and haploid is incorrect. sent5: that the rookery is not Peloponnesian but on-the-job is wrong if the fact that the restharrow does not conserve hold. sent6: the paramecium is not on-the-job. sent7: that the fact that the paramecium is not the haploid is not wrong if the paramecium is not Peloponnesian but it is a tobramycin is not incorrect. sent8: the grotesque is a tobramycin. sent9: if the absolver is a kind of a conserve then the paramecium is not a caroche. sent10: if that the absolver is not a conserve is not false that the paramecium is both a ullage and a haploid is not correct. sent11: the underlip is not a haploid. sent12: the restharrow is not a kind of a tobramycin. sent13: the absolver is not a tobramycin if the underlip is not a haploid. sent14: the underlip is not a kind of a tobramycin if the fact that that the paramecium is not a haploid but a conserve does not hold is right. sent15: the restharrow is not on-the-job if that the rookery is not Peloponnesian but dynamic is not right. sent16: that if the underlip is not a kind of a tobramycin the paramecium is not a conserve and it is not a tobramycin hold. sent17: if the paramecium is not a conserve that the rookery is non-Peloponnesian but it is dynamic is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that that the absolver is both not a caroche and a haploid is not right hold then the underlip is not a tobramycin.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the absolver is not a caroche but it is a haploid.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the absolver is not a ullage.;
$hypothesis$ = the restharrow is not on-the-job. ; $context$ = sent1: that that that the absolver is non-haploid a tobramycin is right does not hold hold if the paramecium is not on-the-job. sent2: the absolver is not a kind of a tobramycin if that the underlip is both non-haploid and a ullage is not right. sent3: the absolver is not a ullage if it is not a caroche and is a haploid. sent4: if that the absolver is not a conserve is not false then the fact that the paramecium is a tobramycin and haploid is incorrect. sent5: that the rookery is not Peloponnesian but on-the-job is wrong if the fact that the restharrow does not conserve hold. sent6: the paramecium is not on-the-job. sent7: that the fact that the paramecium is not the haploid is not wrong if the paramecium is not Peloponnesian but it is a tobramycin is not incorrect. sent8: the grotesque is a tobramycin. sent9: if the absolver is a kind of a conserve then the paramecium is not a caroche. sent10: if that the absolver is not a conserve is not false that the paramecium is both a ullage and a haploid is not correct. sent11: the underlip is not a haploid. sent12: the restharrow is not a kind of a tobramycin. sent13: the absolver is not a tobramycin if the underlip is not a haploid. sent14: the underlip is not a kind of a tobramycin if the fact that that the paramecium is not a haploid but a conserve does not hold is right. sent15: the restharrow is not on-the-job if that the rookery is not Peloponnesian but dynamic is not right. sent16: that if the underlip is not a kind of a tobramycin the paramecium is not a conserve and it is not a tobramycin hold. sent17: if the paramecium is not a conserve that the rookery is non-Peloponnesian but it is dynamic is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that that the absolver is both not a caroche and a haploid is not right hold then the underlip is not a tobramycin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the absolver is not a caroche but it is a haploid.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the absolver is not a ullage.; __UNKNOWN__