the berth is not a covert.
sent1: if the fact that something hustles and does not persist Iguanodontidae is false it does persist Iguanodontidae. sent2: if that the berth is not a SCNT and does not persist nicotine is not correct then the specimen is not a kind of a SCNT. sent3: something does not persist Iguanodontidae and is not a kind of a covert if the fact that it is not herbal is not incorrect. sent4: if the propjet is a roan then the fact that it does not hustle and is reverberant is not true. sent5: if the fauld is not covert but it is a SCNT then the berth is covert. sent6: the fact that the fact that something hustles but it does not persist Iguanodontidae is false if it is not a palette is right. sent7: the brae does not hustle if the propjet does hustle and it is a kind of a echinoderm. sent8: if the propjet does not prioritize beaver the fact that it is not a roan and/or it is not a kind of a wallop does not hold. sent9: the fact that the specimen is a wallop and bombards is not true. sent10: the fauld is not a kind of a wallop if the fact that that the propjet is not a kind of a roan and/or is not a wallop is right is not correct. sent11: if the brae is an herbal then the fact that the berth is not a SCNT and does not persist nicotine does not hold. sent12: that something is not a palette but it does persist nicotine is not wrong if it does not hustle. sent13: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a palette but it is not a echinoderm is not incorrect is wrong if it is not a wallop. sent14: if the brae is not a kind of a palette but it persists nicotine the fauld is a SCNT. sent15: the propjet does not prioritize beaver. sent16: the specimen is not a palette if that that the fauld is a kind of a palette but it is not a kind of a echinoderm is not true hold. sent17: if the berth is a covert then the fauld does persist Iguanodontidae. sent18: the propjet is a roan. sent19: if the brae does not persist Iguanodontidae and does not persist nicotine then the fauld does not persist Iguanodontidae. sent20: the specimen is not a wallop if that it is a wallop that does bombard is wrong. sent21: if something persists Iguanodontidae and is not a SCNT it is not a covert. sent22: if that the propjet does not hustle and it is reverberant does not hold then it hustle.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the berth is covert.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fauld persists Iguanodontidae is true.;
the berth is covert.
sent3 -> int2: the fauld does not persist Iguanodontidae and is not a kind of a covert if it is not herbal.; sent20 & sent9 -> int3: the specimen is not a wallop.; int3 -> int4: something does not wallop.; sent12 -> int5: if the brae does not hustle it is not a palette and it does persist nicotine.; sent4 & sent18 -> int6: the fact that the propjet does not hustle and is not unreverberant does not hold.; sent22 & int6 -> int7: the propjet hustles.;
$hypothesis$ = the berth is not a covert. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something hustles and does not persist Iguanodontidae is false it does persist Iguanodontidae. sent2: if that the berth is not a SCNT and does not persist nicotine is not correct then the specimen is not a kind of a SCNT. sent3: something does not persist Iguanodontidae and is not a kind of a covert if the fact that it is not herbal is not incorrect. sent4: if the propjet is a roan then the fact that it does not hustle and is reverberant is not true. sent5: if the fauld is not covert but it is a SCNT then the berth is covert. sent6: the fact that the fact that something hustles but it does not persist Iguanodontidae is false if it is not a palette is right. sent7: the brae does not hustle if the propjet does hustle and it is a kind of a echinoderm. sent8: if the propjet does not prioritize beaver the fact that it is not a roan and/or it is not a kind of a wallop does not hold. sent9: the fact that the specimen is a wallop and bombards is not true. sent10: the fauld is not a kind of a wallop if the fact that that the propjet is not a kind of a roan and/or is not a wallop is right is not correct. sent11: if the brae is an herbal then the fact that the berth is not a SCNT and does not persist nicotine does not hold. sent12: that something is not a palette but it does persist nicotine is not wrong if it does not hustle. sent13: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a palette but it is not a echinoderm is not incorrect is wrong if it is not a wallop. sent14: if the brae is not a kind of a palette but it persists nicotine the fauld is a SCNT. sent15: the propjet does not prioritize beaver. sent16: the specimen is not a palette if that that the fauld is a kind of a palette but it is not a kind of a echinoderm is not true hold. sent17: if the berth is a covert then the fauld does persist Iguanodontidae. sent18: the propjet is a roan. sent19: if the brae does not persist Iguanodontidae and does not persist nicotine then the fauld does not persist Iguanodontidae. sent20: the specimen is not a wallop if that it is a wallop that does bombard is wrong. sent21: if something persists Iguanodontidae and is not a SCNT it is not a covert. sent22: if that the propjet does not hustle and it is reverberant does not hold then it hustle. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the berth is covert.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fauld persists Iguanodontidae is true.; __UNKNOWN__