the Athapaskan is a unambiguity.
sent1: the Celt is a naphazoline. sent2: if the andiron investigates fieldfare then the taxidermist does investigates fieldfare. sent3: something does investigate fieldfare if the fact that it does not debrief Laney and does not investigate fieldfare is not right. sent4: the Celt does diffuse Sumer if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a glaze and not a herd is false. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a glaze and does herd is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a glaze and it is not a herd. sent7: the fact that the holystone is not a glaze and it does not herd does not hold. sent8: the fact that the Athapaskan is a unambiguity if there exists something such that that it does not investigate fieldfare is correct hold. sent9: the fact that the taxidermist does not investigate fieldfare hold if something does diffuse Sumer and it is a naphazoline. sent10: the fact that the andiron does not debrief Laney and does not investigate fieldfare is not true if it does investigate Spork.
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a glaze and it is not a herd does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Celt does diffuse Sumer.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Celt does diffuse Sumer and it is a naphazoline.; int3 -> int4: something does diffuse Sumer and is a naphazoline.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the taxidermist does not investigate fieldfare.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it does not investigate fieldfare hold.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the Athapaskan is not a unambiguity.
sent3 -> int7: if the fact that the andiron does not debrief Laney and it does not investigate fieldfare does not hold it does investigate fieldfare.;
$hypothesis$ = the Athapaskan is a unambiguity. ; $context$ = sent1: the Celt is a naphazoline. sent2: if the andiron investigates fieldfare then the taxidermist does investigates fieldfare. sent3: something does investigate fieldfare if the fact that it does not debrief Laney and does not investigate fieldfare is not right. sent4: the Celt does diffuse Sumer if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a glaze and not a herd is false. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a glaze and does herd is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a glaze and it is not a herd. sent7: the fact that the holystone is not a glaze and it does not herd does not hold. sent8: the fact that the Athapaskan is a unambiguity if there exists something such that that it does not investigate fieldfare is correct hold. sent9: the fact that the taxidermist does not investigate fieldfare hold if something does diffuse Sumer and it is a naphazoline. sent10: the fact that the andiron does not debrief Laney and does not investigate fieldfare is not true if it does investigate Spork. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a glaze and it is not a herd does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Celt does diffuse Sumer.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Celt does diffuse Sumer and it is a naphazoline.; int3 -> int4: something does diffuse Sumer and is a naphazoline.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the taxidermist does not investigate fieldfare.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it does not investigate fieldfare hold.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__