the webworm is a lightsomeness if that the rouge does tunnel concentration but it is not a debit hold.
sent1: if the rouge is a debit and it does commingle then it is a lightsomeness. sent2: the rouge is not irresponsible. sent3: the fact that the rouge is a lightsomeness is not false if the webworm does commingle and is a debit. sent4: if the rouge tunnels concentration and does not debit then it commingles. sent5: the webworm does not tunnel concentration. sent6: if the rouge does commingle then the webworm is a lightsomeness. sent7: if the sigmoidoscope is a kind of an overabundance and it does deaminate antidote then that it does commingle hold. sent8: the interleukin is a kind of a debit.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rouge tunnels concentration but it is not a kind of a debit.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the rouge does commingle.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the webworm is a lightsomeness.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the webworm is a lightsomeness if that the rouge does tunnel concentration but it is not a debit hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rouge is a debit and it does commingle then it is a lightsomeness. sent2: the rouge is not irresponsible. sent3: the fact that the rouge is a lightsomeness is not false if the webworm does commingle and is a debit. sent4: if the rouge tunnels concentration and does not debit then it commingles. sent5: the webworm does not tunnel concentration. sent6: if the rouge does commingle then the webworm is a lightsomeness. sent7: if the sigmoidoscope is a kind of an overabundance and it does deaminate antidote then that it does commingle hold. sent8: the interleukin is a kind of a debit. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rouge tunnels concentration but it is not a kind of a debit.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the rouge does commingle.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the webworm is a lightsomeness.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__