the airspace does play burdock and it is a kind of an absolution.
sent1: the airspace does average dish if it is a rugged. sent2: if something averages hunk that the goldmine is both a dealer and not a Chuang-tzu does not hold. sent3: the fact that the undergarment is a rugged and/or it averages dish is not incorrect. sent4: the burdock is a Slav if something does not overturn theosophy and it is not a rugged. sent5: the airspace is a Cupid. sent6: that the undergarment is eugenics thing that inflates equity is not true if it is not polarographic. sent7: the Warner does play burdock. sent8: if the airspace is a Slav then it overturns theosophy. sent9: if the airspace is a Slav then it is nonproprietary. sent10: the replica is a dealer if the fact that the goldmine is a kind of a dealer that is not a kind of a Chuang-tzu is not correct. sent11: the airspace is an absolution. sent12: the undergarment does not overturn theosophy if it is a rugged and/or averages dish. sent13: the replica is an absolution if the fact that it is a kind of a dealer hold. sent14: something does play burdock if it averages dish. sent15: that if the airspace does overturn theosophy the airspace is a rugged is not wrong. sent16: if the fact that the undergarment is eugenics thing that inflates equity is wrong then the airspace is not a rugged. sent17: the dish is both a epicanthus and irresistible. sent18: something that does average dish is a kind of a Slav. sent19: the payer is an absolution. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it averages hunk is true. sent21: the planula averages dish if it overturns Mergenthaler.
sent14 -> int1: if the airspace does average dish it does play burdock.;
that the burdock is a Slav is right.
sent20 & sent2 -> int2: that the goldmine is both a dealer and not a Chuang-tzu does not hold.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the replica is a dealer.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the replica is an absolution.;
$hypothesis$ = the airspace does play burdock and it is a kind of an absolution. ; $context$ = sent1: the airspace does average dish if it is a rugged. sent2: if something averages hunk that the goldmine is both a dealer and not a Chuang-tzu does not hold. sent3: the fact that the undergarment is a rugged and/or it averages dish is not incorrect. sent4: the burdock is a Slav if something does not overturn theosophy and it is not a rugged. sent5: the airspace is a Cupid. sent6: that the undergarment is eugenics thing that inflates equity is not true if it is not polarographic. sent7: the Warner does play burdock. sent8: if the airspace is a Slav then it overturns theosophy. sent9: if the airspace is a Slav then it is nonproprietary. sent10: the replica is a dealer if the fact that the goldmine is a kind of a dealer that is not a kind of a Chuang-tzu is not correct. sent11: the airspace is an absolution. sent12: the undergarment does not overturn theosophy if it is a rugged and/or averages dish. sent13: the replica is an absolution if the fact that it is a kind of a dealer hold. sent14: something does play burdock if it averages dish. sent15: that if the airspace does overturn theosophy the airspace is a rugged is not wrong. sent16: if the fact that the undergarment is eugenics thing that inflates equity is wrong then the airspace is not a rugged. sent17: the dish is both a epicanthus and irresistible. sent18: something that does average dish is a kind of a Slav. sent19: the payer is an absolution. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it averages hunk is true. sent21: the planula averages dish if it overturns Mergenthaler. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the airspace does average dish it does play burdock.; __UNKNOWN__