the Revelation does not occur.
sent1: if the burglarizing Swedenborg does not occur the fact that the hijab occurs and the teleportation happens is not right. sent2: the technophobicness occurs. sent3: the regretting does not occur. sent4: the burglarizing Anasazi does not occur if the fact that both the hungering thirteenth and the moot happens is incorrect. sent5: if the fixation occurs the fact that both the burglarizing halophyte and the non-Hebrideanness occurs is wrong. sent6: either the hungering cigarillo or the fixation or both occurs. sent7: if the fact that the burglarizing halophyte happens and the Hebrideanness does not occur is not right then the floating does not occur. sent8: the topspin happens. sent9: if the fact that the floating does not occur is not wrong the topspin but not the moderation occurs. sent10: the fact that both the hungering thirteenth and the moot occurs is false if the fact that the orchestrating Pyxis does not occur hold. sent11: that the Revelation happens is not wrong if the hungering cigarillo occurs and/or the fixation does not occur. sent12: if the floating does not occur then the topspin occurs. sent13: if the burglarizing Anasazi does not occur then the unwholesomeness and the tightsness happens. sent14: either the burglarizing Swedenborg does not occur or the marmoreanness does not occur or both if the hungering whipstitch does not occur. sent15: if the burglarizing Swedenborg does not occur and/or the marmoreanness does not occur the burglarizing Swedenborg does not occur. sent16: if the technophobicness happens then that the topspin but not the moderation happens is wrong. sent17: the moderation does not occur if not the topspin but the hungering cigarillo occurs. sent18: that the hungering whipstitch does not occur and the Japaneseness does not occur is caused by the unwholesomeness. sent19: the disaster does not occur. sent20: the technophobicness does not occur if that both the hijab and the teleportation occurs is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fixation happens is not incorrect.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the burglarizing halophyte happens but the Hebrideanness does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the floating does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the topspin but not the moderation happens.; sent16 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the topspin happens but the moderation does not occur is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fixation does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the hungering cigarillo occurs and/or the fixation does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the Revelation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Revelation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burglarizing Swedenborg does not occur the fact that the hijab occurs and the teleportation happens is not right. sent2: the technophobicness occurs. sent3: the regretting does not occur. sent4: the burglarizing Anasazi does not occur if the fact that both the hungering thirteenth and the moot happens is incorrect. sent5: if the fixation occurs the fact that both the burglarizing halophyte and the non-Hebrideanness occurs is wrong. sent6: either the hungering cigarillo or the fixation or both occurs. sent7: if the fact that the burglarizing halophyte happens and the Hebrideanness does not occur is not right then the floating does not occur. sent8: the topspin happens. sent9: if the fact that the floating does not occur is not wrong the topspin but not the moderation occurs. sent10: the fact that both the hungering thirteenth and the moot occurs is false if the fact that the orchestrating Pyxis does not occur hold. sent11: that the Revelation happens is not wrong if the hungering cigarillo occurs and/or the fixation does not occur. sent12: if the floating does not occur then the topspin occurs. sent13: if the burglarizing Anasazi does not occur then the unwholesomeness and the tightsness happens. sent14: either the burglarizing Swedenborg does not occur or the marmoreanness does not occur or both if the hungering whipstitch does not occur. sent15: if the burglarizing Swedenborg does not occur and/or the marmoreanness does not occur the burglarizing Swedenborg does not occur. sent16: if the technophobicness happens then that the topspin but not the moderation happens is wrong. sent17: the moderation does not occur if not the topspin but the hungering cigarillo occurs. sent18: that the hungering whipstitch does not occur and the Japaneseness does not occur is caused by the unwholesomeness. sent19: the disaster does not occur. sent20: the technophobicness does not occur if that both the hijab and the teleportation occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fixation happens is not incorrect.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the burglarizing halophyte happens but the Hebrideanness does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the floating does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the topspin but not the moderation happens.; sent16 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the topspin happens but the moderation does not occur is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fixation does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the hungering cigarillo occurs and/or the fixation does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__