the superoxide is not incorrigible.
sent1: something does not clutter if the fact that it is a kind of a Sinhalese that does not ding merchantability does not hold. sent2: something is a kind of a Sinhalese and it does ding merchantability. sent3: the fact that the incubator is not a clutter is not false. sent4: that the incubator does not misbelieve hold if something is a kind of a Sinhalese but it does not ding merchantability. sent5: that the incubator is incorrigible but it does not clutter does not hold. sent6: if something is not a Sinhalese it is not incorrigible. sent7: if that something is a Sinhalese and does not ding merchantability does not hold it is not incorrigible. sent8: if the incubator does not misbelieve then the fact that it either is a clutter or is not nonexistent or both does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it does not ding merchantability. sent10: either the incubator does clutter or it is not nonexistent or both. sent11: if the fact that the superoxide is not a Sinhalese hold then it is not incorrigible. sent12: if the incubator does not misbelieve it does not clutter. sent13: something that is not corrigible and is not a clutter does not misbelieve.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the superoxide is a kind of a Sinhalese but it does not ding merchantability.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Sinhalese and it does not ding merchantability.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the incubator does not misbelieve.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the incubator clutters and/or it is not nonexistent is not correct.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the superoxide is a Sinhalese and does not ding merchantability is not correct.; sent7 -> int6: the superoxide is not incorrigible if that it is a Sinhalese and does not ding merchantability is false.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the lomustine is a wise and/or it is not nonexistent is not correct.
sent13 -> int7: the lomustine does not misbelieve if it is incorrigible and it is not a clutter.;
$hypothesis$ = the superoxide is not incorrigible. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not clutter if the fact that it is a kind of a Sinhalese that does not ding merchantability does not hold. sent2: something is a kind of a Sinhalese and it does ding merchantability. sent3: the fact that the incubator is not a clutter is not false. sent4: that the incubator does not misbelieve hold if something is a kind of a Sinhalese but it does not ding merchantability. sent5: that the incubator is incorrigible but it does not clutter does not hold. sent6: if something is not a Sinhalese it is not incorrigible. sent7: if that something is a Sinhalese and does not ding merchantability does not hold it is not incorrigible. sent8: if the incubator does not misbelieve then the fact that it either is a clutter or is not nonexistent or both does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it does not ding merchantability. sent10: either the incubator does clutter or it is not nonexistent or both. sent11: if the fact that the superoxide is not a Sinhalese hold then it is not incorrigible. sent12: if the incubator does not misbelieve it does not clutter. sent13: something that is not corrigible and is not a clutter does not misbelieve. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the superoxide is a kind of a Sinhalese but it does not ding merchantability.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Sinhalese and it does not ding merchantability.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the incubator does not misbelieve.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the incubator clutters and/or it is not nonexistent is not correct.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the superoxide is a Sinhalese and does not ding merchantability is not correct.; sent7 -> int6: the superoxide is not incorrigible if that it is a Sinhalese and does not ding merchantability is false.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__