the bronchospasm does not occur.
sent1: that the Kurdishness does not occur and the bronchospasm does not occur is caused by the Citation. sent2: that the inconsiderableness does not occur is correct if the fact that the inducement and the inconsiderableness occurs does not hold. sent3: both the accusativeness and the cantering happens if the sterilization does not occur. sent4: the astringing happens. sent5: the greensideness does not occur if the dart occurs. sent6: if the abatement happens the neglecting trapshooter occurs. sent7: that both the drilling and the astringing happens does not hold if the bronchospasm does not occur. sent8: the studding Horney occurs if the abatement happens. sent9: the sterilization does not occur and the nesting twiddle does not occur. sent10: not the sobriety but the monotypicness happens if the accusativeness occurs. sent11: if the greensideness does not occur then both the non-tropicalness and the rut occurs. sent12: that the inconsiderableness does not occur brings about that the neglecting Malraux but not the funnel happens. sent13: if the fact that the neglecting trapshooter occurs is correct then the studding Horney occurs. sent14: the drilling does not occur if the fact that both the drilling and the astringing happens is not correct. sent15: that the tropicalness does not occur causes that the Citation occurs and the vertebrate happens. sent16: the bronchospasm occurs if the abatement does not occur. sent17: that the astringing happens is prevented by that the neglecting trapshooter occurs and/or that the drilling happens. sent18: if that the causing warrener does not occur is not wrong the darting happens and/or the Methodistness happens. sent19: the fact that the inducement happens and the inconsiderableness occurs is incorrect if the sobriety does not occur. sent20: that the neglecting Malraux occurs and the funneling does not occur prevents the causing warrener.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abatement happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the neglecting trapshooter occurs.; int1 -> int2: the neglecting trapshooter occurs and/or the drilling happens.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the astringing does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the abatement does not occur.; int5 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
that the studding Horney happens is not false.
sent9 -> int6: the sterilization does not occur.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the accusativeness happens and the canter happens.; int7 -> int8: the accusativeness happens.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: not the sobriety but the monotypicness happens.; int9 -> int10: the sobriety does not occur.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: that the inducement occurs and the inconsiderableness occurs is not true.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: the inconsiderableness does not occur.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: the neglecting Malraux but not the funneling occurs.; sent20 & int13 -> int14: the causing warrener does not occur.; sent18 & int14 -> int15: the dart happens or the Methodistness happens or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the bronchospasm does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Kurdishness does not occur and the bronchospasm does not occur is caused by the Citation. sent2: that the inconsiderableness does not occur is correct if the fact that the inducement and the inconsiderableness occurs does not hold. sent3: both the accusativeness and the cantering happens if the sterilization does not occur. sent4: the astringing happens. sent5: the greensideness does not occur if the dart occurs. sent6: if the abatement happens the neglecting trapshooter occurs. sent7: that both the drilling and the astringing happens does not hold if the bronchospasm does not occur. sent8: the studding Horney occurs if the abatement happens. sent9: the sterilization does not occur and the nesting twiddle does not occur. sent10: not the sobriety but the monotypicness happens if the accusativeness occurs. sent11: if the greensideness does not occur then both the non-tropicalness and the rut occurs. sent12: that the inconsiderableness does not occur brings about that the neglecting Malraux but not the funnel happens. sent13: if the fact that the neglecting trapshooter occurs is correct then the studding Horney occurs. sent14: the drilling does not occur if the fact that both the drilling and the astringing happens is not correct. sent15: that the tropicalness does not occur causes that the Citation occurs and the vertebrate happens. sent16: the bronchospasm occurs if the abatement does not occur. sent17: that the astringing happens is prevented by that the neglecting trapshooter occurs and/or that the drilling happens. sent18: if that the causing warrener does not occur is not wrong the darting happens and/or the Methodistness happens. sent19: the fact that the inducement happens and the inconsiderableness occurs is incorrect if the sobriety does not occur. sent20: that the neglecting Malraux occurs and the funneling does not occur prevents the causing warrener. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abatement happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the neglecting trapshooter occurs.; int1 -> int2: the neglecting trapshooter occurs and/or the drilling happens.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the astringing does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the abatement does not occur.; int5 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__