the opossum does not answer.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a epicurism and it is not costive is not correct. sent2: the graduate is an orient. sent3: if something is a Lothario then it does answer. sent4: if the yawn is not a kind of a flatware then the forget-me-not is not a kind of a gizzard and/or it is not costive. sent5: if the graduate is a surfperch that it is acrogenic is not wrong. sent6: the graduate is a kind of a surfperch. sent7: if something that is Himalayan is not a surfperch then it is not acrogenic. sent8: that the heating is a kind of a epicurism is correct if the fact that the forget-me-not is not a kind of a gizzard is not wrong. sent9: if the glop is not a psychopomp and it is not loose the fact that the yawn is not a flatware hold. sent10: the graduate is not an answer if the opossum is a kind of a surfperch and it is acrogenic. sent11: the graduate is a Lothario and does orient. sent12: if the graduate is a Lothario and it is acrogenic then the opossum is not an answer. sent13: if something is not acrogenic the fact that it is not an orient but a Lothario is not right. sent14: something is not a psychopomp and not loose if it does not fix Presbyterianism. sent15: the heating is an orient if the forget-me-not is not an orient. sent16: if the fact that there is something such that it is a epicurism hold then the opossum is a kind of considerate thing that parses rya. sent17: the heating is a kind of a epicurism if the forget-me-not is not costive. sent18: if that something is considerate is not incorrect then it is Himalayan and is not a surfperch. sent19: the ragwort answers if there is something such that that it is not an orient but a Lothario is incorrect. sent20: everything does not fix Presbyterianism. sent21: the yawn is not a epicurism if there is something such that the fact that it is a epicurism and it is not costive is false. sent22: the yawn parses rya and it is considerate if it is not a epicurism. sent23: that the graduate is not acrogenic and not a Lothario is not correct if the fact that the heating does orient hold.
sent11 -> int1: the graduate is a kind of a Lothario.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: the graduate is acrogenic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the graduate is a kind of a Lothario and it is acrogenic.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the opossum is a kind of an answer.
sent3 -> int4: the opossum does answer if it is a Lothario.; sent18 -> int5: if the yawn is considerate it is Himalayan and is not a surfperch.; sent1 & sent21 -> int6: the yawn is not a epicurism.; sent22 & int6 -> int7: the yawn does parse rya and is considerate.; int7 -> int8: the yawn is considerate.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the yawn is a kind of Himalayan thing that is not a surfperch.; int9 -> int10: something is both Himalayan and not a surfperch.;
$hypothesis$ = the opossum does not answer. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a epicurism and it is not costive is not correct. sent2: the graduate is an orient. sent3: if something is a Lothario then it does answer. sent4: if the yawn is not a kind of a flatware then the forget-me-not is not a kind of a gizzard and/or it is not costive. sent5: if the graduate is a surfperch that it is acrogenic is not wrong. sent6: the graduate is a kind of a surfperch. sent7: if something that is Himalayan is not a surfperch then it is not acrogenic. sent8: that the heating is a kind of a epicurism is correct if the fact that the forget-me-not is not a kind of a gizzard is not wrong. sent9: if the glop is not a psychopomp and it is not loose the fact that the yawn is not a flatware hold. sent10: the graduate is not an answer if the opossum is a kind of a surfperch and it is acrogenic. sent11: the graduate is a Lothario and does orient. sent12: if the graduate is a Lothario and it is acrogenic then the opossum is not an answer. sent13: if something is not acrogenic the fact that it is not an orient but a Lothario is not right. sent14: something is not a psychopomp and not loose if it does not fix Presbyterianism. sent15: the heating is an orient if the forget-me-not is not an orient. sent16: if the fact that there is something such that it is a epicurism hold then the opossum is a kind of considerate thing that parses rya. sent17: the heating is a kind of a epicurism if the forget-me-not is not costive. sent18: if that something is considerate is not incorrect then it is Himalayan and is not a surfperch. sent19: the ragwort answers if there is something such that that it is not an orient but a Lothario is incorrect. sent20: everything does not fix Presbyterianism. sent21: the yawn is not a epicurism if there is something such that the fact that it is a epicurism and it is not costive is false. sent22: the yawn parses rya and it is considerate if it is not a epicurism. sent23: that the graduate is not acrogenic and not a Lothario is not correct if the fact that the heating does orient hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the graduate is a kind of a Lothario.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: the graduate is acrogenic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the graduate is a kind of a Lothario and it is acrogenic.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__