the sleuth middles arming.
sent1: if something bassets and does not traffic Uruguayan then the ball-buster traffics rigmarole. sent2: the fact that the nucleolus does traffic rigmarole hold. sent3: the ball-buster does vitriol camail. sent4: that the modernist does traffic rigmarole but it does not traffic Uruguayan is false if that the reticle is a kind of a basset is correct. sent5: if the ball-buster does vitriol camail it is a kind of a Micronor. sent6: if something traffics ball-buster and it is a kind of a Micronor then it does not traffic rigmarole. sent7: if the nucleolus aurifies it does traffic Uruguayan. sent8: the ball-buster is not a slum. sent9: if something that is not a basset does not traffic Uruguayan then the ball-buster traffics rigmarole. sent10: the ball-buster is a commitment if it is a kind of a Micronor. sent11: the nucleolus does not basset and it does not traffic Uruguayan. sent12: the sleuth does traffic Uruguayan. sent13: The camail does vitriol ball-buster. sent14: the sleuth does not traffic ball-buster and middles arming if that the ball-buster does not traffic ball-buster hold. sent15: the abator does not traffic rigmarole. sent16: the fact that something does vitriol camail and is a Micronor is correct if it does not traffic ball-buster. sent17: if that the ball-buster does not traffic ball-buster is not false the sleuth does not traffic ball-buster. sent18: that the sleuth does aurify is not wrong. sent19: the nucleolus does traffic ball-buster.
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the ball-buster is a Micronor.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ball-buster traffics ball-buster.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ball-buster traffics ball-buster and is a kind of a Micronor.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the ball-buster does not traffic rigmarole is not incorrect if it does traffic ball-buster and it is a kind of a Micronor.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ball-buster does not traffic rigmarole.; sent11 -> int5: the fact that something does not basset and does not traffic Uruguayan is not false.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the ball-buster traffics rigmarole.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the ball-buster does not traffic ball-buster is true.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the sleuth does not traffic ball-buster but it middles arming.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the sleuth does not middle arming.
$hypothesis$ = the sleuth middles arming. ; $context$ = sent1: if something bassets and does not traffic Uruguayan then the ball-buster traffics rigmarole. sent2: the fact that the nucleolus does traffic rigmarole hold. sent3: the ball-buster does vitriol camail. sent4: that the modernist does traffic rigmarole but it does not traffic Uruguayan is false if that the reticle is a kind of a basset is correct. sent5: if the ball-buster does vitriol camail it is a kind of a Micronor. sent6: if something traffics ball-buster and it is a kind of a Micronor then it does not traffic rigmarole. sent7: if the nucleolus aurifies it does traffic Uruguayan. sent8: the ball-buster is not a slum. sent9: if something that is not a basset does not traffic Uruguayan then the ball-buster traffics rigmarole. sent10: the ball-buster is a commitment if it is a kind of a Micronor. sent11: the nucleolus does not basset and it does not traffic Uruguayan. sent12: the sleuth does traffic Uruguayan. sent13: The camail does vitriol ball-buster. sent14: the sleuth does not traffic ball-buster and middles arming if that the ball-buster does not traffic ball-buster hold. sent15: the abator does not traffic rigmarole. sent16: the fact that something does vitriol camail and is a Micronor is correct if it does not traffic ball-buster. sent17: if that the ball-buster does not traffic ball-buster is not false the sleuth does not traffic ball-buster. sent18: that the sleuth does aurify is not wrong. sent19: the nucleolus does traffic ball-buster. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the ball-buster is a Micronor.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ball-buster traffics ball-buster.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ball-buster traffics ball-buster and is a kind of a Micronor.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the ball-buster does not traffic rigmarole is not incorrect if it does traffic ball-buster and it is a kind of a Micronor.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ball-buster does not traffic rigmarole.; sent11 -> int5: the fact that something does not basset and does not traffic Uruguayan is not false.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the ball-buster traffics rigmarole.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the ball-buster does not traffic ball-buster is true.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the sleuth does not traffic ball-buster but it middles arming.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__