there is something such that if it does not outshout Burk then it is a kind of a Graz and/or it does houseclean Citellus.
sent1: if the smut does not outshout Burk it is a Graz. sent2: the concierge is a kind of a ethnography and/or it does outshout puddler. sent3: either the smut is a Graz or it does houseclean Citellus or both if it does outshout Burk. sent4: that that the hardback does parch and does not bear tufted is not true hold. sent5: something nosedives if that it is a kind of a boringness that is not a nosedives is incorrect. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does outshout Burk is not false the smut housecleans Citellus. sent7: there exists something such that if it does outshout Burk then it is a Graz and/or housecleans Citellus. sent8: if the smut outshouts Burk then that it is not a Graz is not true. sent9: something that is a nosedive is a Graz. sent10: the puddler does outshout Burk if the croupier is a Graz. sent11: the smut does outshout Burk and/or it animates. sent12: the hardback does not parch if the fact that it does parch and does not bear tufted is wrong. sent13: the smut is a bioclimatology or it is caudal or both if that it is a Cody hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the smut does not outshout Burk is not incorrect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the smut is a Graz.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the smut is a kind of a Graz or it does houseclean Citellus or both is not wrong.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the smut does not outshout Burk it is a Graz and/or it does houseclean Citellus.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the smut is a kind of a nobelium and/or housecleans Citellus.
sent9 -> int4: the croupier is a kind of a Graz if it does nosedive.; sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the croupier is a boringness and is not a nosedive is wrong then it does nosedive.; sent12 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the hardback does not parch is right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does not parch.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not outshout Burk then it is a kind of a Graz and/or it does houseclean Citellus. ; $context$ = sent1: if the smut does not outshout Burk it is a Graz. sent2: the concierge is a kind of a ethnography and/or it does outshout puddler. sent3: either the smut is a Graz or it does houseclean Citellus or both if it does outshout Burk. sent4: that that the hardback does parch and does not bear tufted is not true hold. sent5: something nosedives if that it is a kind of a boringness that is not a nosedives is incorrect. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does outshout Burk is not false the smut housecleans Citellus. sent7: there exists something such that if it does outshout Burk then it is a Graz and/or housecleans Citellus. sent8: if the smut outshouts Burk then that it is not a Graz is not true. sent9: something that is a nosedive is a Graz. sent10: the puddler does outshout Burk if the croupier is a Graz. sent11: the smut does outshout Burk and/or it animates. sent12: the hardback does not parch if the fact that it does parch and does not bear tufted is wrong. sent13: the smut is a bioclimatology or it is caudal or both if that it is a Cody hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the smut does not outshout Burk is not incorrect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the smut is a Graz.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the smut is a kind of a Graz or it does houseclean Citellus or both is not wrong.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the smut does not outshout Burk it is a Graz and/or it does houseclean Citellus.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__