if the fact that the superload does not accelerate is not wrong the fact that the outlet houses commutability but it is not a Uruguayan is false.
sent1: the fact that the outlet is a hammock that does not house commutability is not true. sent2: something is not a delegacy and does accelerate if it is a Uruguayan. sent3: if something that does house commutability is not a kind of a Uruguayan then it is not a delegacy. sent4: the superload does not house commutability. sent5: something is a Uruguayan if it is unapproachable. sent6: that the fact that the unit does accelerate and is not a delegacy is false if the superload is not a delegacy hold. sent7: the outlet does house commutability but it is not Uruguayan. sent8: the outlet does house commutability and is not a Uruguayan if the fact that the superload does not accelerate is not false. sent9: if the superload does not accelerate then the unit is a hammock that is not a delegacy. sent10: if the unit is not a Uruguayan that the outlet houses commutability and it is a kind of a Uruguayan is incorrect. sent11: that the outlet does house commutability and is a kind of a Uruguayan is wrong. sent12: if something that is a hammock is a kind of a delegacy then it is not a Uruguayan. sent13: if the superload does not accelerate that the outlet houses commutability and it is a kind of a Uruguayan is not true. sent14: if the unit is a kind of a hammock that is a delegacy it is not a kind of a Uruguayan. sent15: if the unit is not a kind of a Uruguayan then the outlet does house commutability and is not a kind of a Uruguayan. sent16: the fact that the unit houses commutability and is not a delegacy is incorrect. sent17: if a hammock is not a delegacy it is not a kind of a Uruguayan. sent18: the unit is not a delegacy if that the superload does not accelerate is not wrong. sent19: the unit is not a delegacy. sent20: if the unit is not a kind of a Uruguayan that the superload does accelerate and is not a hammock is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the superload does not accelerate.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the unit is a hammock but it is not a delegacy.; sent17 -> int2: that the unit is not Uruguayan is right if it is both a hammock and not a delegacy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the unit is not Uruguayan.;
the yashmak is not a delegacy.
sent2 -> int4: if the yashmak is Uruguayan then it is not a delegacy and accelerates.; sent5 -> int5: the yashmak is a kind of a Uruguayan if it is unapproachable.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the superload does not accelerate is not wrong the fact that the outlet houses commutability but it is not a Uruguayan is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the outlet is a hammock that does not house commutability is not true. sent2: something is not a delegacy and does accelerate if it is a Uruguayan. sent3: if something that does house commutability is not a kind of a Uruguayan then it is not a delegacy. sent4: the superload does not house commutability. sent5: something is a Uruguayan if it is unapproachable. sent6: that the fact that the unit does accelerate and is not a delegacy is false if the superload is not a delegacy hold. sent7: the outlet does house commutability but it is not Uruguayan. sent8: the outlet does house commutability and is not a Uruguayan if the fact that the superload does not accelerate is not false. sent9: if the superload does not accelerate then the unit is a hammock that is not a delegacy. sent10: if the unit is not a Uruguayan that the outlet houses commutability and it is a kind of a Uruguayan is incorrect. sent11: that the outlet does house commutability and is a kind of a Uruguayan is wrong. sent12: if something that is a hammock is a kind of a delegacy then it is not a Uruguayan. sent13: if the superload does not accelerate that the outlet houses commutability and it is a kind of a Uruguayan is not true. sent14: if the unit is a kind of a hammock that is a delegacy it is not a kind of a Uruguayan. sent15: if the unit is not a kind of a Uruguayan then the outlet does house commutability and is not a kind of a Uruguayan. sent16: the fact that the unit houses commutability and is not a delegacy is incorrect. sent17: if a hammock is not a delegacy it is not a kind of a Uruguayan. sent18: the unit is not a delegacy if that the superload does not accelerate is not wrong. sent19: the unit is not a delegacy. sent20: if the unit is not a kind of a Uruguayan that the superload does accelerate and is not a hammock is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the superload does not accelerate.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the unit is a hammock but it is not a delegacy.; sent17 -> int2: that the unit is not Uruguayan is right if it is both a hammock and not a delegacy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the unit is not Uruguayan.; __UNKNOWN__