there is something such that if it is not a carangid then that it is not noncritical and it is nonradioactive is not true.
sent1: if something does not neglect crepe the fact that it is both not a mucilage and a gong is not right. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a carangid it is both not noncritical and nonradioactive. sent3: something is critical and nonradioactive if it is not a carangid. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a carangid the fact that it is not noncritical and it is nonradioactive is incorrect. sent5: that something is not a bladder but it is institutional is not correct if it does not sentimentalise munificence. sent6: the fact that something is a jug and lacrimatory does not hold if it does not tampon. sent7: there is something such that if it is not much then that it is not a ohmmeter and it tampons is not right. sent8: the fact that something is not noncritical but it is nonradioactive is false if it is not a carangid. sent9: if something is not unactable then the fact that it is a kind of a nipple and it neglects eel is false. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not aggressive is true then the fact that it is a xylene and it is a drain is not correct. sent11: if that something is not phallic hold that it is a kind of a paleoclimatology and it does sentimentalise safety is wrong. sent12: if something is a carangid then that it is not noncritical and it is nonradioactive does not hold. sent13: if the crepe is a kind of a carangid the fact that that it is a kind of critical thing that is nonradioactive is true is not true. sent14: if the crepe is not a kind of a sphygmomanometer then the fact that it is not nonradioactive and it is irreversible is incorrect. sent15: if the crepe is not a Bergson then it is critical thing that is a Acular. sent16: the fact that the crepe is both not radioactive and Avestan is not right if it is not a slicing. sent17: if something is not a kind of a lawyerbush then the fact that it is not a kind of a Bergson and it is a kind of a Holly is false.
sent8 -> int1: if the crepe is not a carangid the fact that it is not noncritical and it is nonradioactive is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a carangid then that it is not noncritical and it is nonradioactive is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not neglect crepe the fact that it is both not a mucilage and a gong is not right. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a carangid it is both not noncritical and nonradioactive. sent3: something is critical and nonradioactive if it is not a carangid. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a carangid the fact that it is not noncritical and it is nonradioactive is incorrect. sent5: that something is not a bladder but it is institutional is not correct if it does not sentimentalise munificence. sent6: the fact that something is a jug and lacrimatory does not hold if it does not tampon. sent7: there is something such that if it is not much then that it is not a ohmmeter and it tampons is not right. sent8: the fact that something is not noncritical but it is nonradioactive is false if it is not a carangid. sent9: if something is not unactable then the fact that it is a kind of a nipple and it neglects eel is false. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not aggressive is true then the fact that it is a xylene and it is a drain is not correct. sent11: if that something is not phallic hold that it is a kind of a paleoclimatology and it does sentimentalise safety is wrong. sent12: if something is a carangid then that it is not noncritical and it is nonradioactive does not hold. sent13: if the crepe is a kind of a carangid the fact that that it is a kind of critical thing that is nonradioactive is true is not true. sent14: if the crepe is not a kind of a sphygmomanometer then the fact that it is not nonradioactive and it is irreversible is incorrect. sent15: if the crepe is not a Bergson then it is critical thing that is a Acular. sent16: the fact that the crepe is both not radioactive and Avestan is not right if it is not a slicing. sent17: if something is not a kind of a lawyerbush then the fact that it is not a kind of a Bergson and it is a kind of a Holly is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the crepe is not a carangid the fact that it is not noncritical and it is nonradioactive is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__