the scour does not occur.
sent1: that the destaining motorist does not occur and the sounding Sue occurs brings about that the roasting occurs. sent2: the muffing darky occurs but the delusion does not occur. sent3: if that the destaining motorist does not occur but the sounding Sue occurs is wrong then the scour does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the destaining motorist does not occur and the sounding Sue happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the roasting occurs is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: the muffing sanatorium does not occur and/or the roasting occurs.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the delusion does not occur is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the scour does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the destaining motorist does not occur and the sounding Sue occurs brings about that the roasting occurs. sent2: the muffing darky occurs but the delusion does not occur. sent3: if that the destaining motorist does not occur but the sounding Sue occurs is wrong then the scour does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the destaining motorist does not occur and the sounding Sue happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the roasting occurs is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: the muffing sanatorium does not occur and/or the roasting occurs.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the delusion does not occur is not false.; __UNKNOWN__