that the noctiluca does not drone psilophyte is true.
sent1: if something that does extinguish purdah is non-cutting then it is not a bracken. sent2: if the softener is not a Fredericton that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is a Fredericton is wrong. sent3: that the perithelium is not a bracken hold if it is a kind of a Fredericton. sent4: if something does not extinguish purdah but it is a kind of a cutting the noctiluca is a kind of a Cicer. sent5: if the perithelium is not a kind of a bracken then that the Walloon does not extinguish purdah but it is a kind of a cutting is not wrong. sent6: something that is a Fredericton is not a kind of a bracken. sent7: that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is a Fredericton is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that it does not extinguish purdah. sent9: everything does drone towel. sent10: if the perithelium is not a kind of a bracken then the Walloon cuts. sent11: something is not a bracken if that it contributes seismograph and it is not a kind of a Fredericton is not right. sent12: the Walloon is a kind of a cutting. sent13: if the softener is epiphytic then it does adjoin. sent14: the softener is both worthless and a flap. sent15: the softener is not a Fredericton if it is worthless and is a flap. sent16: the noctiluca is not a Cicer if the softener does adjoin. sent17: either the softener is not inaccurate or it does not drone Pagophilus or both if it drones towel. sent18: if the softener is not a kind of a Fredericton that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is not a Fredericton is not true. sent19: something extinguishes purdah and does cut. sent20: something does drone psilophyte if it is a Cicer. sent21: if a Fredericton does not contribute seismograph then it does not drone psilophyte. sent22: the softener does flap. sent23: something is a kind of a Fredericton but it does not contribute seismograph if it is not a kind of a bracken. sent24: if something is not a Cicer then it extinguishes purdah and it is not cutting. sent25: the lamination is worthless if that the softener is not a bracken but it is worthless is wrong.
sent15 & sent14 -> int1: the softener is not a kind of a Fredericton.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is not a kind of a Fredericton does not hold.; sent11 -> int3: if that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is not a Fredericton is not right it is not a bracken.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the perithelium is not a bracken.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Walloon does not extinguish purdah and is cutting.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does not extinguish purdah and it is cutting.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the noctiluca is a kind of a Cicer.; sent20 -> int8: if the noctiluca is a Cicer then it does drone psilophyte.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the lamination is both an absence and worthless.
$hypothesis$ = that the noctiluca does not drone psilophyte is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does extinguish purdah is non-cutting then it is not a bracken. sent2: if the softener is not a Fredericton that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is a Fredericton is wrong. sent3: that the perithelium is not a bracken hold if it is a kind of a Fredericton. sent4: if something does not extinguish purdah but it is a kind of a cutting the noctiluca is a kind of a Cicer. sent5: if the perithelium is not a kind of a bracken then that the Walloon does not extinguish purdah but it is a kind of a cutting is not wrong. sent6: something that is a Fredericton is not a kind of a bracken. sent7: that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is a Fredericton is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that it does not extinguish purdah. sent9: everything does drone towel. sent10: if the perithelium is not a kind of a bracken then the Walloon cuts. sent11: something is not a bracken if that it contributes seismograph and it is not a kind of a Fredericton is not right. sent12: the Walloon is a kind of a cutting. sent13: if the softener is epiphytic then it does adjoin. sent14: the softener is both worthless and a flap. sent15: the softener is not a Fredericton if it is worthless and is a flap. sent16: the noctiluca is not a Cicer if the softener does adjoin. sent17: either the softener is not inaccurate or it does not drone Pagophilus or both if it drones towel. sent18: if the softener is not a kind of a Fredericton that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is not a Fredericton is not true. sent19: something extinguishes purdah and does cut. sent20: something does drone psilophyte if it is a Cicer. sent21: if a Fredericton does not contribute seismograph then it does not drone psilophyte. sent22: the softener does flap. sent23: something is a kind of a Fredericton but it does not contribute seismograph if it is not a kind of a bracken. sent24: if something is not a Cicer then it extinguishes purdah and it is not cutting. sent25: the lamination is worthless if that the softener is not a bracken but it is worthless is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent14 -> int1: the softener is not a kind of a Fredericton.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is not a kind of a Fredericton does not hold.; sent11 -> int3: if that the perithelium contributes seismograph and is not a Fredericton is not right it is not a bracken.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the perithelium is not a bracken.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Walloon does not extinguish purdah and is cutting.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does not extinguish purdah and it is cutting.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the noctiluca is a kind of a Cicer.; sent20 -> int8: if the noctiluca is a Cicer then it does drone psilophyte.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__