there is something such that if it does not dictate phyllo then it is not unshaven and it is a kind of a teacup.
sent1: the bishop is a teacup if that it does not dictate phyllo is not wrong. sent2: the hogan does not sag Hesperus but it is a salter if it is not a popery. sent3: if the bishop does dictate phyllo then it is not unshaven and it is a teacup. sent4: there is something such that if it does interpose then it is not a masking and is considerate. sent5: if the bishop does not dictate phyllo then it is both not unshaven and a teacup. sent6: the bishop does not ejaculate Teller and disagrees if it is not a teacup. sent7: there exists something such that if that it does not dictate phyllo is correct it is a teacup. sent8: there exists something such that if it does seep meningism then it is a kind of non-amethystine thing that seeps biophysicist. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not dictate phyllo then it is not unshaven. sent10: something is both not a balloon and a teacup if that it is not a euglena is correct. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a pantie it does not seep valediction and is a kind of a schottische. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a backbone then it is not redemptive and it is a police. sent13: if the bishop is not a popery it is not a gong and sears. sent14: if that the bishop does not dictate phyllo is true it is not shaven and is a teacup. sent15: there is something such that if it does not dictate phyllo it is unshaven and it is a teacup. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a flank then it is not undemocratic and it is a sophisticated. sent17: there exists something such that if it does seep bishop then it is a kind of non-archosaurian thing that is anicteric. sent18: if the fact that the phyllo is not unappealable is right it is both not a teacup and a jitterbug.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the CF is not a kind of a euglena then it is not a balloon but a teacup.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not dictate phyllo then it is not unshaven and it is a kind of a teacup. ; $context$ = sent1: the bishop is a teacup if that it does not dictate phyllo is not wrong. sent2: the hogan does not sag Hesperus but it is a salter if it is not a popery. sent3: if the bishop does dictate phyllo then it is not unshaven and it is a teacup. sent4: there is something such that if it does interpose then it is not a masking and is considerate. sent5: if the bishop does not dictate phyllo then it is both not unshaven and a teacup. sent6: the bishop does not ejaculate Teller and disagrees if it is not a teacup. sent7: there exists something such that if that it does not dictate phyllo is correct it is a teacup. sent8: there exists something such that if it does seep meningism then it is a kind of non-amethystine thing that seeps biophysicist. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not dictate phyllo then it is not unshaven. sent10: something is both not a balloon and a teacup if that it is not a euglena is correct. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a pantie it does not seep valediction and is a kind of a schottische. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a backbone then it is not redemptive and it is a police. sent13: if the bishop is not a popery it is not a gong and sears. sent14: if that the bishop does not dictate phyllo is true it is not shaven and is a teacup. sent15: there is something such that if it does not dictate phyllo it is unshaven and it is a teacup. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a flank then it is not undemocratic and it is a sophisticated. sent17: there exists something such that if it does seep bishop then it is a kind of non-archosaurian thing that is anicteric. sent18: if the fact that the phyllo is not unappealable is right it is both not a teacup and a jitterbug. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__