there is something such that if it is a combination it is disorderly.
sent1: the thinker is a combination and a lusterware. sent2: the anticholinesterase is a kind of a lusterware if something does disguise pegmatite and it is disorderly. sent3: something is not orderly if it does not disguise pegmatite. sent4: something is an interview if it is not realistic. sent5: the thinker is an injustice if there is something such that it is a kind of a combination and disguises pegmatite. sent6: something is allophonic if it is not a kind of a combination. sent7: the thinker is a kind of a self-punishment if it is a lusterware. sent8: the anticholinesterase is a Italy and a valise. sent9: the pegmatite is a kind of a Tuscan. sent10: the thinker is a lusterware if something that is a kind of a combination is an injustice. sent11: if a lusterware is disorderly the anticholinesterase is a combination. sent12: the thinker is a Hun. sent13: something that is not allophonic is an injustice. sent14: if the thinker is allophonic and a lusterware then it is not a kind of an injustice. sent15: there exists something such that it is a combination. sent16: the job is not an injustice. sent17: the thinker is a kind of a Laos and it is a dolomite. sent18: the thinker is hypodermal. sent19: the anticholinesterase is not a kind of an injustice. sent20: the thinker deals. sent21: the thinker is a kind of a lusterware. sent22: that the anticholinesterase is not a lusterware is not incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the anticholinesterase is a combination.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anticholinesterase does disguise pegmatite.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the anticholinesterase is a combination and disguises pegmatite.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a combination and it disguises pegmatite.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the thinker is an injustice.; sent3 -> int4: the anticholinesterase is disorderly if it does not disguise pegmatite.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a combination it is disorderly. ; $context$ = sent1: the thinker is a combination and a lusterware. sent2: the anticholinesterase is a kind of a lusterware if something does disguise pegmatite and it is disorderly. sent3: something is not orderly if it does not disguise pegmatite. sent4: something is an interview if it is not realistic. sent5: the thinker is an injustice if there is something such that it is a kind of a combination and disguises pegmatite. sent6: something is allophonic if it is not a kind of a combination. sent7: the thinker is a kind of a self-punishment if it is a lusterware. sent8: the anticholinesterase is a Italy and a valise. sent9: the pegmatite is a kind of a Tuscan. sent10: the thinker is a lusterware if something that is a kind of a combination is an injustice. sent11: if a lusterware is disorderly the anticholinesterase is a combination. sent12: the thinker is a Hun. sent13: something that is not allophonic is an injustice. sent14: if the thinker is allophonic and a lusterware then it is not a kind of an injustice. sent15: there exists something such that it is a combination. sent16: the job is not an injustice. sent17: the thinker is a kind of a Laos and it is a dolomite. sent18: the thinker is hypodermal. sent19: the anticholinesterase is not a kind of an injustice. sent20: the thinker deals. sent21: the thinker is a kind of a lusterware. sent22: that the anticholinesterase is not a lusterware is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the anticholinesterase is a combination.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anticholinesterase does disguise pegmatite.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the anticholinesterase is a combination and disguises pegmatite.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a combination and it disguises pegmatite.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the thinker is an injustice.; sent3 -> int4: the anticholinesterase is disorderly if it does not disguise pegmatite.; __UNKNOWN__