the sprat is inconspicuous.
sent1: that the couverture is optical and it is a charterhouse is not wrong if the fact that the carborundum does not clock Mansart is not false. sent2: if something is a kind of a Libocedrus it is a mailboat. sent3: the decorator is a Libocedrus and/or is a isomerism if there exists something such that it is a isomerism. sent4: the douche is a kind of a isomerism if there is something such that the fact that it is not allogamous and not covert is true. sent5: the fact that if the tier is an initiate then the laurel-tree is a aeromedicine is true. sent6: the carborundum does not clock Mansart if the fact that the fact that it does clock Mansart and it does not defray unwillingness is true is false. sent7: if that the laurel-tree is not an initiate and it is not a conductress is false then the decorator does stifle. sent8: if that the tier does not stifle or it is not a aeromedicine or both does not hold the sprat is not inconspicuous. sent9: the escargot is not allogamous and is not a covert if there exists something such that it is unintelligible. sent10: if the carborundum is non-marly that it does clock Mansart and it does not defray unwillingness does not hold. sent11: something does salve gratitude if it is a Arminian. sent12: that the laurel-tree is an initiate and is not a kind of a conductress is not correct. sent13: that the laurel-tree is both not an initiate and a conductress is not true if the tier is a aeromedicine. sent14: the laurel-tree is a kind of a Arminian if the decorator is a mailboat. sent15: everything is non-marly. sent16: if the decorator is a kind of a stifle then the sprat is inconspicuous. sent17: if the couverture is a charterhouse it is unintelligible. sent18: if something is a isomerism then it is a mailboat. sent19: the fact that the tier is not a kind of a aeromedicine is false. sent20: that the laurel-tree is not an initiate but it is a conductress is not correct.
the sprat is not inconspicuous.
sent11 -> int1: if the laurel-tree is a kind of a Arminian then it does salve gratitude.; sent15 -> int2: the carborundum is not marly.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the carborundum clocks Mansart but it does not defray unwillingness is not true is not false.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the carborundum does not clock Mansart.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the couverture is optical thing that is a charterhouse.; int5 -> int6: the couverture is a kind of a charterhouse.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: the couverture is unintelligible.; int7 -> int8: something is unintelligible.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the escargot is not allogamous and it is non-covert.; int9 -> int10: something is non-allogamous and not covert.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the douche is a kind of a isomerism.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is a isomerism is true.; int12 & sent3 -> int13: the decorator is a Libocedrus or it is a isomerism or both.; sent2 -> int14: if the decorator is a kind of a Libocedrus then it is a mailboat.; sent18 -> int15: if the decorator is a isomerism it is a kind of a mailboat.; int13 & int14 & int15 -> int16: the decorator is a kind of a mailboat.; sent14 & int16 -> int17: that the laurel-tree is Arminian is correct.; int1 & int17 -> int18: the laurel-tree does salve gratitude.; int18 -> int19: something does salve gratitude.;
$hypothesis$ = the sprat is inconspicuous. ; $context$ = sent1: that the couverture is optical and it is a charterhouse is not wrong if the fact that the carborundum does not clock Mansart is not false. sent2: if something is a kind of a Libocedrus it is a mailboat. sent3: the decorator is a Libocedrus and/or is a isomerism if there exists something such that it is a isomerism. sent4: the douche is a kind of a isomerism if there is something such that the fact that it is not allogamous and not covert is true. sent5: the fact that if the tier is an initiate then the laurel-tree is a aeromedicine is true. sent6: the carborundum does not clock Mansart if the fact that the fact that it does clock Mansart and it does not defray unwillingness is true is false. sent7: if that the laurel-tree is not an initiate and it is not a conductress is false then the decorator does stifle. sent8: if that the tier does not stifle or it is not a aeromedicine or both does not hold the sprat is not inconspicuous. sent9: the escargot is not allogamous and is not a covert if there exists something such that it is unintelligible. sent10: if the carborundum is non-marly that it does clock Mansart and it does not defray unwillingness does not hold. sent11: something does salve gratitude if it is a Arminian. sent12: that the laurel-tree is an initiate and is not a kind of a conductress is not correct. sent13: that the laurel-tree is both not an initiate and a conductress is not true if the tier is a aeromedicine. sent14: the laurel-tree is a kind of a Arminian if the decorator is a mailboat. sent15: everything is non-marly. sent16: if the decorator is a kind of a stifle then the sprat is inconspicuous. sent17: if the couverture is a charterhouse it is unintelligible. sent18: if something is a isomerism then it is a mailboat. sent19: the fact that the tier is not a kind of a aeromedicine is false. sent20: that the laurel-tree is not an initiate but it is a conductress is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__