the onager is non-paniculate.
sent1: the narcissus is not an antecedent if there exists something such that that it is not paniculate and it is not a kind of a Erlenmeyer is incorrect. sent2: the narcissus is not a kind of a contortion if there is something such that it is a Erlenmeyer. sent3: the onager is not wetting. sent4: the arc-boutant is a lifeline. sent5: the onager is not paniculate if the spherometer is not a paleobiology. sent6: the narcissus does not piece Melchior if there is something such that it is a contortion. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a paleobiology and it is not an antecedent is wrong. sent8: if something is not a Shahn it is a bossism. sent9: a non-anastomotic thing girdles drab. sent10: something pieces Melchior and is a kind of a Erlenmeyer if it does not wet. sent11: the spherometer pieces Halley. sent12: if something does not piece Melchior it is paniculate and a paleobiology. sent13: the narcissus does not piece Melchior if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a contortion and not an antecedent is not correct. sent14: everything is not wetting. sent15: that the narcissus is not an antecedent is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the spherometer does not piece Melchior and is not a paleobiology is wrong. sent17: the fact that the placebo is not a kind of a contortion and it is not antecedent is incorrect if the spherometer is a kind of a paleobiology. sent18: the placebo does not wet if there is something such that it is antecedent. sent19: something is not a kind of a graded and it is not fictile. sent20: that if the spherometer is not a kind of a Erlenmeyer or does not piece Melchior or both the onager does not piece Melchior hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spherometer is a paleobiology.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the placebo is not a contortion and not antecedent is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a contortion and not antecedent is false.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the narcissus does not piece Melchior.; sent10 -> int4: the narcissus does piece Melchior and it is a Erlenmeyer if it is not wetting.; sent14 -> int5: the narcissus is not wetting.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the narcissus pieces Melchior and is a Erlenmeyer.; int6 -> int7: that the narcissus does not piece Melchior is wrong.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the spherometer is a paleobiology is false.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the onager is paniculate.
sent12 -> int10: the onager is paniculate and it is a paleobiology if it does not piece Melchior.;
$hypothesis$ = the onager is non-paniculate. ; $context$ = sent1: the narcissus is not an antecedent if there exists something such that that it is not paniculate and it is not a kind of a Erlenmeyer is incorrect. sent2: the narcissus is not a kind of a contortion if there is something such that it is a Erlenmeyer. sent3: the onager is not wetting. sent4: the arc-boutant is a lifeline. sent5: the onager is not paniculate if the spherometer is not a paleobiology. sent6: the narcissus does not piece Melchior if there is something such that it is a contortion. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a paleobiology and it is not an antecedent is wrong. sent8: if something is not a Shahn it is a bossism. sent9: a non-anastomotic thing girdles drab. sent10: something pieces Melchior and is a kind of a Erlenmeyer if it does not wet. sent11: the spherometer pieces Halley. sent12: if something does not piece Melchior it is paniculate and a paleobiology. sent13: the narcissus does not piece Melchior if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a contortion and not an antecedent is not correct. sent14: everything is not wetting. sent15: that the narcissus is not an antecedent is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the spherometer does not piece Melchior and is not a paleobiology is wrong. sent17: the fact that the placebo is not a kind of a contortion and it is not antecedent is incorrect if the spherometer is a kind of a paleobiology. sent18: the placebo does not wet if there is something such that it is antecedent. sent19: something is not a kind of a graded and it is not fictile. sent20: that if the spherometer is not a kind of a Erlenmeyer or does not piece Melchior or both the onager does not piece Melchior hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spherometer is a paleobiology.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the placebo is not a contortion and not antecedent is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a contortion and not antecedent is false.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the narcissus does not piece Melchior.; sent10 -> int4: the narcissus does piece Melchior and it is a Erlenmeyer if it is not wetting.; sent14 -> int5: the narcissus is not wetting.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the narcissus pieces Melchior and is a Erlenmeyer.; int6 -> int7: that the narcissus does not piece Melchior is wrong.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the spherometer is a paleobiology is false.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__