the Episcopalian does not finish hookup but it is a forint.
sent1: something finishes hookup and it does box if it is not a nailer. sent2: that something is both a Lendl and not a forint is not true if it does not finish histoincompatibility. sent3: if the positivist is not an omega it is not a kind of a nailer and it is a Scutigerella. sent4: if that the veal is both a Lendl and not a forint does not hold the Episcopalian is a kind of a forint. sent5: that the express is not a forint is not incorrect if the fact that the fact that it splats imperceptibility and it expands is not false is incorrect. sent6: the positivist is not an omega. sent7: the fact that the Episcopalian does not finish hookup but it is a forint is not correct if the express is not a kind of a forint. sent8: if the positivist does not splat imperceptibility then that the express does splat imperceptibility and it does expand does not hold. sent9: if the positivist does finish hookup and it does box that the Episcopalian does not finish hookup is correct. sent10: there is something such that it is a Lendl. sent11: the Marks is a quartzite. sent12: the veal is a kind of a boxed. sent13: the veal does finish histoincompatibility if there exists something such that it is a Lendl. sent14: if the veal finishes histoincompatibility and boxes then the positivist does not splat imperceptibility.
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the veal finishes histoincompatibility.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the veal finishes histoincompatibility and it is a kind of a boxed.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the positivist does not splat imperceptibility.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the express does splat imperceptibility and it does expand is not true.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the express is not a forint.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the Episcopalian does not finish hookup and is a forint.
sent1 -> int6: the fact that the positivist does finish hookup and it is a kind of the boxed if the positivist is not a nailer hold.; sent3 & sent6 -> int7: the positivist is not a nailer and is a kind of a Scutigerella.; int7 -> int8: the positivist is not a nailer.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the positivist finishes hookup and does box.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the Episcopalian does not finish hookup.; sent2 -> int11: if the veal does not finish histoincompatibility the fact that it is a kind of a Lendl and is not a forint is not correct.; sent11 -> int12: something is a quartzite.;
$hypothesis$ = the Episcopalian does not finish hookup but it is a forint. ; $context$ = sent1: something finishes hookup and it does box if it is not a nailer. sent2: that something is both a Lendl and not a forint is not true if it does not finish histoincompatibility. sent3: if the positivist is not an omega it is not a kind of a nailer and it is a Scutigerella. sent4: if that the veal is both a Lendl and not a forint does not hold the Episcopalian is a kind of a forint. sent5: that the express is not a forint is not incorrect if the fact that the fact that it splats imperceptibility and it expands is not false is incorrect. sent6: the positivist is not an omega. sent7: the fact that the Episcopalian does not finish hookup but it is a forint is not correct if the express is not a kind of a forint. sent8: if the positivist does not splat imperceptibility then that the express does splat imperceptibility and it does expand does not hold. sent9: if the positivist does finish hookup and it does box that the Episcopalian does not finish hookup is correct. sent10: there is something such that it is a Lendl. sent11: the Marks is a quartzite. sent12: the veal is a kind of a boxed. sent13: the veal does finish histoincompatibility if there exists something such that it is a Lendl. sent14: if the veal finishes histoincompatibility and boxes then the positivist does not splat imperceptibility. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the veal finishes histoincompatibility.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the veal finishes histoincompatibility and it is a kind of a boxed.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the positivist does not splat imperceptibility.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the express does splat imperceptibility and it does expand is not true.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the express is not a forint.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__