the fact that the interlocutor does fornicate if the radiologist does foster is incorrect.
sent1: the interlocutor fornicates if the radiologist fosters and does not comb. sent2: something does not croon and it is not Slovakian. sent3: the moonwort is not a kind of a teletypewriter if there exists something such that the fact that it is eukaryotic and it is a kind of an oblivion does not hold. sent4: the radiologist does not comb if there is something such that it does not croon and it is not Slovakian. sent5: there is something such that that it is eukaryotic thing that is an oblivion does not hold. sent6: something does not croon and is Slovakian. sent7: the keelboat is not a kind of a canafistola if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a teletypewriter. sent8: if something is not a canafistola it does not foster and does fornicate. sent9: if something does not foster but it does fornicate the interlocutor does not comb. sent10: there exists something such that it does not croon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the radiologist fosters.; sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the radiologist does not comb.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the radiologist fosters but it does not comb.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the interlocutor does fornicate.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that there exists something such that it is not a kind of a borage and is not a connivance is not false.
sent8 -> int4: if the keelboat is not a canafistola then it does not foster and does fornicate.; sent5 & sent3 -> int5: the moonwort is not a kind of a teletypewriter.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not a teletypewriter.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the keelboat is not a canafistola.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the keelboat does not foster but it does fornicate.; int8 -> int9: something does not foster and fornicates.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the interlocutor is not a kind of a comb.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is not a comb.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the interlocutor does fornicate if the radiologist does foster is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the interlocutor fornicates if the radiologist fosters and does not comb. sent2: something does not croon and it is not Slovakian. sent3: the moonwort is not a kind of a teletypewriter if there exists something such that the fact that it is eukaryotic and it is a kind of an oblivion does not hold. sent4: the radiologist does not comb if there is something such that it does not croon and it is not Slovakian. sent5: there is something such that that it is eukaryotic thing that is an oblivion does not hold. sent6: something does not croon and is Slovakian. sent7: the keelboat is not a kind of a canafistola if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a teletypewriter. sent8: if something is not a canafistola it does not foster and does fornicate. sent9: if something does not foster but it does fornicate the interlocutor does not comb. sent10: there exists something such that it does not croon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the radiologist fosters.; sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the radiologist does not comb.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the radiologist fosters but it does not comb.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the interlocutor does fornicate.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__