if the cigarillo is alkalotic then the fact that the isopod is not a desperado hold.
sent1: if that something is not a Sufi and/or it is not a kind of a wakefulness is not right then it is alkalotic. sent2: that the hookworm does not patrol Pseudolarix or it is not alkalotic or both is not right if the cigarillo does not patrol Pseudolarix. sent3: the isopod is not autodidactic. sent4: if that the fact that the cigarillo either is not Sufi or is not a wakefulness or both hold is false it is alkalotic. sent5: the fact that the isopod is not a Kruger and does acquaint sheepdog does not hold. sent6: if the fact that either something is not a Sufi or it is not a wakefulness or both is not correct it is not alkalotic. sent7: the hookworm is not a Kruger. sent8: the fact that the sheepdog is a inherence and is a kind of a Sufi does not hold. sent9: the fact that the cigarillo is a wakefulness hold if the sheepdog is not Sufi. sent10: something does patrol Pseudolarix. sent11: the fact that the isopod is alkalotic and not a Kruger is incorrect. sent12: the isopod is not a desperado if it acquaints sheepdog. sent13: that the cigarillo is not Sufi and/or it is not a kind of a wakefulness does not hold if the sheepdog is not Sufi. sent14: the sheepdog is not a kind of a wakefulness if that it is non-alkalotic but not a Sufi is not correct. sent15: if there exists something such that it does not patrol Pseudolarix then that the isopod is not a Kruger and acquaints sheepdog does not hold. sent16: the sheepdog does not acquaint sheepdog. sent17: the hookworm does not patrol Pseudolarix if that the sheepdog is a kind of a inherence but it is not a Sufi is incorrect. sent18: the cigarillo is a wakefulness. sent19: if the fact that the isopod is not a Kruger and it does not acquaint sheepdog does not hold then it is not a kind of a desperado. sent20: if the fact that the cigarillo is not non-alkalotic hold then the isopod is a kind of a desperado. sent21: if the fact that something is non-Sufi and/or a wakefulness is wrong it is not alkalotic. sent22: if that the cigarillo is not a kind of a Sufi and/or it is a wakefulness is wrong then it is not alkalotic. sent23: the cigarillo does not acquaint sheepdog if the isopod is alkalotic. sent24: if the fact that the sheepdog is not a inherence and/or it is not a Kruger is not right it is not alkalotic.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sheepdog is a inherence but it is not Sufi.; assump2 -> int1: the sheepdog is not a Sufi.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the cigarillo is not a Sufi or is not a wakefulness or both is not true.; sent6 -> int3: the cigarillo is not alkalotic if that it is not a Sufi and/or is not a kind of a wakefulness is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cigarillo is not alkalotic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cigarillo is alkalotic hold.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the sheepdog is a inherence but it is non-Sufi does not hold.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the hookworm does not patrol Pseudolarix.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it does not patrol Pseudolarix.;
$hypothesis$ = if the cigarillo is alkalotic then the fact that the isopod is not a desperado hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a Sufi and/or it is not a kind of a wakefulness is not right then it is alkalotic. sent2: that the hookworm does not patrol Pseudolarix or it is not alkalotic or both is not right if the cigarillo does not patrol Pseudolarix. sent3: the isopod is not autodidactic. sent4: if that the fact that the cigarillo either is not Sufi or is not a wakefulness or both hold is false it is alkalotic. sent5: the fact that the isopod is not a Kruger and does acquaint sheepdog does not hold. sent6: if the fact that either something is not a Sufi or it is not a wakefulness or both is not correct it is not alkalotic. sent7: the hookworm is not a Kruger. sent8: the fact that the sheepdog is a inherence and is a kind of a Sufi does not hold. sent9: the fact that the cigarillo is a wakefulness hold if the sheepdog is not Sufi. sent10: something does patrol Pseudolarix. sent11: the fact that the isopod is alkalotic and not a Kruger is incorrect. sent12: the isopod is not a desperado if it acquaints sheepdog. sent13: that the cigarillo is not Sufi and/or it is not a kind of a wakefulness does not hold if the sheepdog is not Sufi. sent14: the sheepdog is not a kind of a wakefulness if that it is non-alkalotic but not a Sufi is not correct. sent15: if there exists something such that it does not patrol Pseudolarix then that the isopod is not a Kruger and acquaints sheepdog does not hold. sent16: the sheepdog does not acquaint sheepdog. sent17: the hookworm does not patrol Pseudolarix if that the sheepdog is a kind of a inherence but it is not a Sufi is incorrect. sent18: the cigarillo is a wakefulness. sent19: if the fact that the isopod is not a Kruger and it does not acquaint sheepdog does not hold then it is not a kind of a desperado. sent20: if the fact that the cigarillo is not non-alkalotic hold then the isopod is a kind of a desperado. sent21: if the fact that something is non-Sufi and/or a wakefulness is wrong it is not alkalotic. sent22: if that the cigarillo is not a kind of a Sufi and/or it is a wakefulness is wrong then it is not alkalotic. sent23: the cigarillo does not acquaint sheepdog if the isopod is alkalotic. sent24: if the fact that the sheepdog is not a inherence and/or it is not a Kruger is not right it is not alkalotic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sheepdog is a inherence but it is not Sufi.; assump2 -> int1: the sheepdog is not a Sufi.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the cigarillo is not a Sufi or is not a wakefulness or both is not true.; sent6 -> int3: the cigarillo is not alkalotic if that it is not a Sufi and/or is not a kind of a wakefulness is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cigarillo is not alkalotic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cigarillo is alkalotic hold.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the sheepdog is a inherence but it is non-Sufi does not hold.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the hookworm does not patrol Pseudolarix.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it does not patrol Pseudolarix.; __UNKNOWN__