the fact that the updraft happens is not incorrect.
sent1: if the law does not occur that both the sour and the onrush occurs is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the acceptiveness occurs and the depression does not occur is not true. sent3: if the acceptiveness occurs then the updraft does not occur. sent4: the fact that the acceptiveness occurs and the depression does not occur is false if the brotherliness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the sting does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: the non-brotherlyness is triggered by that not the sting but the filarialness occurs. sent7: the sting does not occur if that the attendance happens is not wrong. sent8: that the attendance occurs brings about that the sting does not occur but the filarialness occurs. sent9: the attendance occurs. sent10: that the brotherliness happens is prevented by that the sting and the filarialness occurs. sent11: if that the acceptiveness does not occur and the depression does not occur is not true the updraft does not occur. sent12: if the fact that both the sourness and the onrush occurs is incorrect the onrush does not occur. sent13: if the onrush does not occur the depression occurs and the acceptiveness happens. sent14: if the brotherliness does not occur then that the acceptiveness does not occur and the depression does not occur is not correct. sent15: if the Californianness does not occur the law does not occur and the spitting does not occur.
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: not the sting but the filarialness occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the brotherliness does not occur.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the acceptiveness does not occur and the depression does not occur is not right.; sent11 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the updraft occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the updraft happens is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the law does not occur that both the sour and the onrush occurs is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the acceptiveness occurs and the depression does not occur is not true. sent3: if the acceptiveness occurs then the updraft does not occur. sent4: the fact that the acceptiveness occurs and the depression does not occur is false if the brotherliness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the sting does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: the non-brotherlyness is triggered by that not the sting but the filarialness occurs. sent7: the sting does not occur if that the attendance happens is not wrong. sent8: that the attendance occurs brings about that the sting does not occur but the filarialness occurs. sent9: the attendance occurs. sent10: that the brotherliness happens is prevented by that the sting and the filarialness occurs. sent11: if that the acceptiveness does not occur and the depression does not occur is not true the updraft does not occur. sent12: if the fact that both the sourness and the onrush occurs is incorrect the onrush does not occur. sent13: if the onrush does not occur the depression occurs and the acceptiveness happens. sent14: if the brotherliness does not occur then that the acceptiveness does not occur and the depression does not occur is not correct. sent15: if the Californianness does not occur the law does not occur and the spitting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: not the sting but the filarialness occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the brotherliness does not occur.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the acceptiveness does not occur and the depression does not occur is not right.; sent11 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__