that there is something such that the fact that it is not unemotional and it does not convoy splitworm is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the Coke is not unemotional but it convoys splitworm does not hold. sent2: the chlordiazepoxide is not a Anatidae. sent3: there is nothing such that it is not unemotional and does not convoy splitworm. sent4: the fact that the Coke is not a kind of a shelduck and does not convoy splitworm is wrong. sent5: something that is not a turnaround and/or is a Cercospora is not a macrame. sent6: the owner does not untwine if there is something such that that it untwine and it is not a Aramaic is not true. sent7: there is nothing such that it is not a Psittacus and it does not vocalize. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is unemotional and does not convoy splitworm does not hold. sent9: there is something such that that it does not convoy barrier and it is not a debarment does not hold. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does not dump and does not unbend Astacidae is false. sent11: if the chlordiazepoxide is not a Anatidae the fact that it untwines and is not a Aramaic does not hold. sent12: there is nothing such that it does not tease satrap and is not a kind of a Aramaic. sent13: there exists nothing such that it is unemotional and it does not convoy splitworm. sent14: the fact that the stainer is not jawless and does not gun is not right if the convert does not macrame. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it is emotional and does convoy splitworm is not right. sent16: that the Coke is not gutsy and does not convoy splitworm is not right. sent17: there is nothing such that it is non-unemotional thing that does convoy splitworm. sent18: the fact that the Coke is unemotional but it does not convoy splitworm is not true.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Coke is not unemotional and it does not convoy splitworm is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
that that the stainer is not jawless and it does not gun is not correct is not incorrect.
sent5 -> int2: if the convert is not a turnaround and/or it is a Cercospora it is not a kind of a macrame.; sent11 & sent2 -> int3: that the chlordiazepoxide untwines and is not a Aramaic does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it untwines and is not a Aramaic does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the owner does untwine does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not untwine.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that the fact that it is not unemotional and it does not convoy splitworm is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Coke is not unemotional but it convoys splitworm does not hold. sent2: the chlordiazepoxide is not a Anatidae. sent3: there is nothing such that it is not unemotional and does not convoy splitworm. sent4: the fact that the Coke is not a kind of a shelduck and does not convoy splitworm is wrong. sent5: something that is not a turnaround and/or is a Cercospora is not a macrame. sent6: the owner does not untwine if there is something such that that it untwine and it is not a Aramaic is not true. sent7: there is nothing such that it is not a Psittacus and it does not vocalize. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is unemotional and does not convoy splitworm does not hold. sent9: there is something such that that it does not convoy barrier and it is not a debarment does not hold. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does not dump and does not unbend Astacidae is false. sent11: if the chlordiazepoxide is not a Anatidae the fact that it untwines and is not a Aramaic does not hold. sent12: there is nothing such that it does not tease satrap and is not a kind of a Aramaic. sent13: there exists nothing such that it is unemotional and it does not convoy splitworm. sent14: the fact that the stainer is not jawless and does not gun is not right if the convert does not macrame. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it is emotional and does convoy splitworm is not right. sent16: that the Coke is not gutsy and does not convoy splitworm is not right. sent17: there is nothing such that it is non-unemotional thing that does convoy splitworm. sent18: the fact that the Coke is unemotional but it does not convoy splitworm is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Coke is not unemotional and it does not convoy splitworm is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__