the fact that if that the aikido happens is not wrong the negligence does not occur and the abdominal does not occur is false.
sent1: the fact that the bowling nationalist but not the pricking occurs is wrong. sent2: the invoking happens if the gala occurs. sent3: if the fact that not the besieging haunch but the besieging Burgundy happens is not right that the besieging Arawak does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: that the negligence occurs and the popularness happens prevents that the aikido occurs. sent5: not the gambling but the northernness occurs if the besieging Arawak does not occur. sent6: the propping sect occurs. sent7: the incarnation and the popularness occurs if the propping sect does not occur. sent8: the fact that the blastomycoticness does not occur is correct. sent9: both the popularness and the propping sect happens. sent10: that the abdominal occurs and the galvanizing does not occur is wrong if the hobnobing does not occur. sent11: the Justice does not occur. sent12: if the abdominal occurs that that the aikido does not occur but the negligence happens is not incorrect does not hold. sent13: that the coaching but not the pricking happens is triggered by that the freelanceness does not occur. sent14: that the besieging tap happens and the gala occurs is triggered by that the besieging c does not occur. sent15: both the environmentalness and the pirouette occurs. sent16: the freelanceness does not occur if the fact that the causing occurs and/or the achondriticness happens does not hold. sent17: that the galvanizing does not occur or the desirousness happens or both is not correct if the invoking happens. sent18: the hobnobing does not occur. sent19: the fact that the besieging trigonometrician occurs and the Armageddon does not occur does not hold. sent20: if the gamble does not occur then the fact that the causing happens and/or the achondriticness happens does not hold. sent21: the abdominalness does not occur if the fact that the abdominalness but not the galvanizing happens is not true. sent22: the hobnobing occurs if that the galvanizing does not occur or the desirousness happens or both is not correct. sent23: if both the negligence and the popularness happens the aikido happens. sent24: that the besieging c does not occur is triggered by that the coaching occurs. sent25: that the hobnobing happens yields that the abdominalness happens.
sent9 -> int1: the popularness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the negligence occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the negligence and the popularness happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the aikido does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the aikido occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the negligence occurs is not true.; sent10 & sent18 -> int6: that the abdominalness happens but the galvanizing does not occur is false.; sent21 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the abdominalness does not occur hold.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the negligence does not occur and the abdominalness does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the incarnation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the aikido happens is not wrong the negligence does not occur and the abdominal does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bowling nationalist but not the pricking occurs is wrong. sent2: the invoking happens if the gala occurs. sent3: if the fact that not the besieging haunch but the besieging Burgundy happens is not right that the besieging Arawak does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: that the negligence occurs and the popularness happens prevents that the aikido occurs. sent5: not the gambling but the northernness occurs if the besieging Arawak does not occur. sent6: the propping sect occurs. sent7: the incarnation and the popularness occurs if the propping sect does not occur. sent8: the fact that the blastomycoticness does not occur is correct. sent9: both the popularness and the propping sect happens. sent10: that the abdominal occurs and the galvanizing does not occur is wrong if the hobnobing does not occur. sent11: the Justice does not occur. sent12: if the abdominal occurs that that the aikido does not occur but the negligence happens is not incorrect does not hold. sent13: that the coaching but not the pricking happens is triggered by that the freelanceness does not occur. sent14: that the besieging tap happens and the gala occurs is triggered by that the besieging c does not occur. sent15: both the environmentalness and the pirouette occurs. sent16: the freelanceness does not occur if the fact that the causing occurs and/or the achondriticness happens does not hold. sent17: that the galvanizing does not occur or the desirousness happens or both is not correct if the invoking happens. sent18: the hobnobing does not occur. sent19: the fact that the besieging trigonometrician occurs and the Armageddon does not occur does not hold. sent20: if the gamble does not occur then the fact that the causing happens and/or the achondriticness happens does not hold. sent21: the abdominalness does not occur if the fact that the abdominalness but not the galvanizing happens is not true. sent22: the hobnobing occurs if that the galvanizing does not occur or the desirousness happens or both is not correct. sent23: if both the negligence and the popularness happens the aikido happens. sent24: that the besieging c does not occur is triggered by that the coaching occurs. sent25: that the hobnobing happens yields that the abdominalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the popularness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the negligence occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the negligence and the popularness happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the aikido does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the aikido occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the negligence occurs is not true.; sent10 & sent18 -> int6: that the abdominalness happens but the galvanizing does not occur is false.; sent21 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the abdominalness does not occur hold.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the negligence does not occur and the abdominalness does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__