the loment is interstellar and is desirable.
sent1: that the horizon is a kind of a afforestation and does not maintain Ruth is incorrect if it is not upmarket. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a creditor but upmarket does not hold then the papier-mache is not unrespectable. sent3: the loment is desirable if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a daub or does not suckle pyramid or both is not true. sent4: the fact that the vociferator is both not coastal and not a disinvestment is not true if it is not a kind of a ferrocyanide. sent5: if something is a disinvestment and/or unrespectable it is not upmarket. sent6: the fact that the jewels-of-opar is a TSS but it does not maintain sycophant does not hold. sent7: if the papier-mache is undesirable then the loment is undesirable and is upmarket. sent8: the loment is interstellar if the vociferator fructifies. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a daub and/or it does not suckle pyramid does not hold. sent10: if there exists something such that that it is not a disinvestment or it is not desirable or both is incorrect the papier-mache is coastal. sent11: the papier-mache is a kind of a disinvestment. sent12: the jewels-of-opar is not coastal if that the papier-mache is not a kind of a ferrocyanide and is not a kind of a creditor does not hold. sent13: that the jewels-of-opar is not a creditor but it is upmarket is wrong. sent14: the vociferator is coastal thing that does fructify if that the jewels-of-opar is not coastal is not wrong. sent15: the vociferator is upmarket. sent16: the loment is not subsurface if the fact that it is bloodless is right. sent17: the loment is a daub. sent18: that the toothbrush does recline and it is client-server is not false. sent19: if something is not upmarket the fact that it is not a ferrocyanide and not a creditor is not correct.
sent11 -> int1: the papier-mache is a kind of a disinvestment and/or it is unrespectable.; sent5 -> int2: if either the papier-mache is a disinvestment or it is unrespectable or both then it is not upmarket.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the papier-mache is not upmarket.; sent19 -> int4: that the papier-mache is not a ferrocyanide and is not a kind of a creditor does not hold if it is not upmarket.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the papier-mache is not a ferrocyanide and is not a kind of a creditor does not hold.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the jewels-of-opar is not coastal.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the vociferator is coastal and it does fructify.; int7 -> int8: the vociferator does fructify.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the loment is interstellar.; sent9 & sent3 -> int10: the loment is not undesirable.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that that the loment is interstellar and it is desirable is not right is right.
sent13 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a creditor and it is upmarket is wrong.; int11 & sent2 -> int12: the papier-mache is not unrespectable.;
$hypothesis$ = the loment is interstellar and is desirable. ; $context$ = sent1: that the horizon is a kind of a afforestation and does not maintain Ruth is incorrect if it is not upmarket. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a creditor but upmarket does not hold then the papier-mache is not unrespectable. sent3: the loment is desirable if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a daub or does not suckle pyramid or both is not true. sent4: the fact that the vociferator is both not coastal and not a disinvestment is not true if it is not a kind of a ferrocyanide. sent5: if something is a disinvestment and/or unrespectable it is not upmarket. sent6: the fact that the jewels-of-opar is a TSS but it does not maintain sycophant does not hold. sent7: if the papier-mache is undesirable then the loment is undesirable and is upmarket. sent8: the loment is interstellar if the vociferator fructifies. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a daub and/or it does not suckle pyramid does not hold. sent10: if there exists something such that that it is not a disinvestment or it is not desirable or both is incorrect the papier-mache is coastal. sent11: the papier-mache is a kind of a disinvestment. sent12: the jewels-of-opar is not coastal if that the papier-mache is not a kind of a ferrocyanide and is not a kind of a creditor does not hold. sent13: that the jewels-of-opar is not a creditor but it is upmarket is wrong. sent14: the vociferator is coastal thing that does fructify if that the jewels-of-opar is not coastal is not wrong. sent15: the vociferator is upmarket. sent16: the loment is not subsurface if the fact that it is bloodless is right. sent17: the loment is a daub. sent18: that the toothbrush does recline and it is client-server is not false. sent19: if something is not upmarket the fact that it is not a ferrocyanide and not a creditor is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the papier-mache is a kind of a disinvestment and/or it is unrespectable.; sent5 -> int2: if either the papier-mache is a disinvestment or it is unrespectable or both then it is not upmarket.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the papier-mache is not upmarket.; sent19 -> int4: that the papier-mache is not a ferrocyanide and is not a kind of a creditor does not hold if it is not upmarket.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the papier-mache is not a ferrocyanide and is not a kind of a creditor does not hold.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the jewels-of-opar is not coastal.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the vociferator is coastal and it does fructify.; int7 -> int8: the vociferator does fructify.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the loment is interstellar.; sent9 & sent3 -> int10: the loment is not undesirable.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__