the fact that either the rupestralness or the galloping or both occurs is wrong.
sent1: the orthographicness happens or the baiting happens or both if the thermogravimetry occurs. sent2: the operableness happens. sent3: the orthographicness occurs. sent4: that the fashionableness happens is caused by that the bloating occurs. sent5: the aniseikonicness happens. sent6: the prefabrication does not occur. sent7: the refracting occurs. sent8: that the refracting does not occur yields that the spectating diesel-hydraulic happens and the spectating calm occurs. sent9: the tangibleness happens if the fashionableness occurs. sent10: the fib happens or the sophisticate happens or both. sent11: the rupestralness does not occur if the fact that not the gallop but the recessiveness occurs is not correct. sent12: if the recessive does not occur then that the weaning Goldman occurs is correct. sent13: that the recessive or the irresistibleness or both happens is brought about by that the aniseikonicness occurs. sent14: if the spectating calm and the refracting occurs the weaning Goldman does not occur. sent15: the rupestralness happens if the spectating calm does not occur. sent16: if the weaning Phellodendron occurs then that not the bloating but the thrombosing go-ahead happens is wrong. sent17: the extracellularness happens. sent18: that the thrombosing Pyrrhus occurs is triggered by either that the bloat does not occur or the crackling or both. sent19: the ablativeness occurs. sent20: the weaning Goldman occurs if either the recessive does not occur or the irresistibleness occurs or both. sent21: if that the operableness occurs hold the fact that the weaning Phellodendron happens hold. sent22: if the aniseikonicness happens then the non-recessiveness and/or the irresistibleness happens. sent23: if the fact that the bloat does not occur but the thrombosing go-ahead occurs does not hold the bloat happens. sent24: the four-wheelness happens. sent25: the recessive happens or the irresistibleness occurs or both. sent26: the fact that if the tangibleness happens then the aniseikonicness or the non-mildness or both happens is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectating calm occurs.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the spectating calm and the refracting occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the weaning Goldman does not occur.; sent22 & sent5 -> int3: the recessive does not occur and/or the irresistibleness occurs.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: that the weaning Goldman happens is not incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the spectating calm does not occur is true.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the rupestralness happens.; int7 -> hypothesis;
either the non-unscientificness or the spectating diesel-hydraulic or both happens.
sent21 & sent2 -> int8: the weaning Phellodendron occurs.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: that not the bloating but the thrombosing go-ahead occurs is not correct.; sent23 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the bloat does not occur is false.; sent4 & int10 -> int11: the fashionableness occurs.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: the tangibleness happens.; sent26 & int12 -> int13: either the aniseikonicness happens or the mildness does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the rupestralness or the galloping or both occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the orthographicness happens or the baiting happens or both if the thermogravimetry occurs. sent2: the operableness happens. sent3: the orthographicness occurs. sent4: that the fashionableness happens is caused by that the bloating occurs. sent5: the aniseikonicness happens. sent6: the prefabrication does not occur. sent7: the refracting occurs. sent8: that the refracting does not occur yields that the spectating diesel-hydraulic happens and the spectating calm occurs. sent9: the tangibleness happens if the fashionableness occurs. sent10: the fib happens or the sophisticate happens or both. sent11: the rupestralness does not occur if the fact that not the gallop but the recessiveness occurs is not correct. sent12: if the recessive does not occur then that the weaning Goldman occurs is correct. sent13: that the recessive or the irresistibleness or both happens is brought about by that the aniseikonicness occurs. sent14: if the spectating calm and the refracting occurs the weaning Goldman does not occur. sent15: the rupestralness happens if the spectating calm does not occur. sent16: if the weaning Phellodendron occurs then that not the bloating but the thrombosing go-ahead happens is wrong. sent17: the extracellularness happens. sent18: that the thrombosing Pyrrhus occurs is triggered by either that the bloat does not occur or the crackling or both. sent19: the ablativeness occurs. sent20: the weaning Goldman occurs if either the recessive does not occur or the irresistibleness occurs or both. sent21: if that the operableness occurs hold the fact that the weaning Phellodendron happens hold. sent22: if the aniseikonicness happens then the non-recessiveness and/or the irresistibleness happens. sent23: if the fact that the bloat does not occur but the thrombosing go-ahead occurs does not hold the bloat happens. sent24: the four-wheelness happens. sent25: the recessive happens or the irresistibleness occurs or both. sent26: the fact that if the tangibleness happens then the aniseikonicness or the non-mildness or both happens is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectating calm occurs.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the spectating calm and the refracting occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the weaning Goldman does not occur.; sent22 & sent5 -> int3: the recessive does not occur and/or the irresistibleness occurs.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: that the weaning Goldman happens is not incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the spectating calm does not occur is true.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the rupestralness happens.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__