the curry does loot termite.
sent1: something is not chalybeate. sent2: the counterbalance is an efferent and not a Cedrela. sent3: the lioness is not an efferent if the counterbalance is an efferent that is not a kind of a Cedrela. sent4: if the longer populates juggernaut then the curry loots termite. sent5: the Episcopalian is a kind of a yawl and it is a synthetism. sent6: the counterbalance is not a kind of a Cedrela. sent7: if the fact that the fact that something is both not a synthetism and a Calvin is correct is incorrect then it is non-epilithic. sent8: the Episcopalian is a kind of a tepidness if the longer does not populate juggernaut. sent9: the fact that the lioness is epilithic hold if there exists something such that that that it is chalybeate or is not a tepidness or both is right is false. sent10: there exists something such that that it is chalybeate and/or it is a tepidness is not true. sent11: if the longer does not populate juggernaut then that the Episcopalian is chalybeate or it is not a tepidness or both is not true. sent12: something does not loot termite if that it populates juggernaut and it does loot termite is incorrect. sent13: the fact that something is both not a synthetism and a Calvin is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of an efferent is not false. sent14: the fact that the fact that the lioness is a synthetism and is a Calvin is not correct hold. sent15: the lioness is not an efferent if the counterbalance is an efferent and it is a Cedrela. sent16: the Episcopalian is a kind of a tepidness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the longer does not populate juggernaut.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Episcopalian is chalybeate or it is not a tepidness or both is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is chalybeate and/or is not a tepidness is incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the lioness is epilithic.; sent7 -> int4: if that the lioness is not a synthetism but it is a Calvin is not right it is not epilithic.; sent13 -> int5: if the lioness is non-efferent then that it is not a synthetism and it is a Calvin does not hold.; sent3 & sent2 -> int6: the lioness is not an efferent.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the lioness is not a synthetism but it is a Calvin is not right.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the lioness is not epilithic.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the longer does populate juggernaut.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Episcopalian is a yawl but it is not obstetrics is not incorrect.
sent5 -> int11: the Episcopalian is a yawl.;
$hypothesis$ = the curry does loot termite. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not chalybeate. sent2: the counterbalance is an efferent and not a Cedrela. sent3: the lioness is not an efferent if the counterbalance is an efferent that is not a kind of a Cedrela. sent4: if the longer populates juggernaut then the curry loots termite. sent5: the Episcopalian is a kind of a yawl and it is a synthetism. sent6: the counterbalance is not a kind of a Cedrela. sent7: if the fact that the fact that something is both not a synthetism and a Calvin is correct is incorrect then it is non-epilithic. sent8: the Episcopalian is a kind of a tepidness if the longer does not populate juggernaut. sent9: the fact that the lioness is epilithic hold if there exists something such that that that it is chalybeate or is not a tepidness or both is right is false. sent10: there exists something such that that it is chalybeate and/or it is a tepidness is not true. sent11: if the longer does not populate juggernaut then that the Episcopalian is chalybeate or it is not a tepidness or both is not true. sent12: something does not loot termite if that it populates juggernaut and it does loot termite is incorrect. sent13: the fact that something is both not a synthetism and a Calvin is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of an efferent is not false. sent14: the fact that the fact that the lioness is a synthetism and is a Calvin is not correct hold. sent15: the lioness is not an efferent if the counterbalance is an efferent and it is a Cedrela. sent16: the Episcopalian is a kind of a tepidness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the longer does not populate juggernaut.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Episcopalian is chalybeate or it is not a tepidness or both is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is chalybeate and/or is not a tepidness is incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the lioness is epilithic.; sent7 -> int4: if that the lioness is not a synthetism but it is a Calvin is not right it is not epilithic.; sent13 -> int5: if the lioness is non-efferent then that it is not a synthetism and it is a Calvin does not hold.; sent3 & sent2 -> int6: the lioness is not an efferent.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the lioness is not a synthetism but it is a Calvin is not right.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the lioness is not epilithic.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the longer does populate juggernaut.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__