the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a wringer or unobtrusive or both is not true it is not a kind of a sweatsuit is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the gofer is not a kind of a wringer and/or it is unobtrusive is not true it is not a sweatsuit. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it wakes segregated and/or it reflects why does not hold it is not hilar. sent3: if the fact that the gofer is not unobtrusive or an asp or both is false then it impairs. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is not a truck or it is autobiographical or both does not hold it is not a kind of a Whitmonday. sent5: if that something is not agrobiologic and/or is a kind of a demographic does not hold then it does not wake segregated. sent6: if the gofer is not a Boethius or a minuet or both then it is not a kind of an asp. sent7: if the fact that the gofer is not a lorikeet or does wake meaning or both is not true then it is not unobtrusive. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a tarnish or is Corsican or both is false then it is not a phone. sent9: the mamo is not appealable if that either it is not unscholarly or it is faucal or both is false. sent10: if the fact that the protectionist is not a minuet and/or it is a brittle-star is false then it is not a kind of a gaffsail.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not agrobiologic and/or it is demographic is wrong the fact that it does not wake segregated hold.
sent5 -> int1: if that the bristlegrass is not agrobiologic or is a kind of a demographic or both is not true then that it does not wake segregated is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a wringer or unobtrusive or both is not true it is not a kind of a sweatsuit is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the gofer is not a kind of a wringer and/or it is unobtrusive is not true it is not a sweatsuit. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it wakes segregated and/or it reflects why does not hold it is not hilar. sent3: if the fact that the gofer is not unobtrusive or an asp or both is false then it impairs. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is not a truck or it is autobiographical or both does not hold it is not a kind of a Whitmonday. sent5: if that something is not agrobiologic and/or is a kind of a demographic does not hold then it does not wake segregated. sent6: if the gofer is not a Boethius or a minuet or both then it is not a kind of an asp. sent7: if the fact that the gofer is not a lorikeet or does wake meaning or both is not true then it is not unobtrusive. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a tarnish or is Corsican or both is false then it is not a phone. sent9: the mamo is not appealable if that either it is not unscholarly or it is faucal or both is false. sent10: if the fact that the protectionist is not a minuet and/or it is a brittle-star is false then it is not a kind of a gaffsail. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__