that the adumbration does aggregate eclectic and does not yell Alar is not right.
sent1: if something dissociates Veracruz and it does crow it does not aggregate eclectic. sent2: the cowrie does not dissociate Veracruz. sent3: something does aggregate eclectic and does not yell Alar if that it does not dissociate Veracruz is not wrong. sent4: that the adumbration does aggregate eclectic and it does yell Alar is incorrect if the bedsitter does not aggregate eclectic. sent5: that the bedsitter does not yell Alar hold. sent6: if something is not Germanic then the fact that it is both quintessential and a Justinian is not right. sent7: The Veracruz dissociates bedsitter. sent8: if the redbelly is a aminopyrine but it is not landless it is a kind of a Argonauta. sent9: that the adumbration aggregates eclectic and does yell Alar is not correct. sent10: the poulette is not a Justinian if the fact that the pendant is quintessential and it is a Justinian is false. sent11: something that yells Alar and crows does not dissociate Veracruz. sent12: if a kina is a Argonauta then the pendant is not a Germanic. sent13: the redbelly is a kind of a kina. sent14: if the bedsitter does not aggregate eclectic then that the adumbration does aggregate eclectic but it does not yell Alar is wrong. sent15: the redbelly is a aminopyrine and is not landless. sent16: the bedsitter dissociates Veracruz.
sent1 -> int1: the bedsitter does not aggregate eclectic if it does dissociate Veracruz and crows.;
the adumbration aggregates eclectic but it does not yell Alar.
sent3 -> int2: if the adumbration does not dissociate Veracruz then it does aggregate eclectic and does not yell Alar.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the pendant is quintessential thing that is a Justinian hold is false if it is not a Germanic.; sent8 & sent15 -> int4: the redbelly is a Argonauta.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the redbelly is a kina and is a Argonauta.; int5 -> int6: something is both a kina and a Argonauta.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the pendant is not a Germanic.; int3 & int7 -> int8: that the pendant is both quintessential and a Justinian is wrong.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the poulette is not a Justinian.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is not a Justinian hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the adumbration does aggregate eclectic and does not yell Alar is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something dissociates Veracruz and it does crow it does not aggregate eclectic. sent2: the cowrie does not dissociate Veracruz. sent3: something does aggregate eclectic and does not yell Alar if that it does not dissociate Veracruz is not wrong. sent4: that the adumbration does aggregate eclectic and it does yell Alar is incorrect if the bedsitter does not aggregate eclectic. sent5: that the bedsitter does not yell Alar hold. sent6: if something is not Germanic then the fact that it is both quintessential and a Justinian is not right. sent7: The Veracruz dissociates bedsitter. sent8: if the redbelly is a aminopyrine but it is not landless it is a kind of a Argonauta. sent9: that the adumbration aggregates eclectic and does yell Alar is not correct. sent10: the poulette is not a Justinian if the fact that the pendant is quintessential and it is a Justinian is false. sent11: something that yells Alar and crows does not dissociate Veracruz. sent12: if a kina is a Argonauta then the pendant is not a Germanic. sent13: the redbelly is a kind of a kina. sent14: if the bedsitter does not aggregate eclectic then that the adumbration does aggregate eclectic but it does not yell Alar is wrong. sent15: the redbelly is a aminopyrine and is not landless. sent16: the bedsitter dissociates Veracruz. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the bedsitter does not aggregate eclectic if it does dissociate Veracruz and crows.; __UNKNOWN__