that the oceanicness and the hydraulicsness occurs is triggered by that the manifolding does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the Balzacianness occurs hold. sent2: the shingling happens if the clamatorialness occurs. sent3: if the protectiveness does not occur both the oceanicness and the trophicness happens. sent4: that the trophicness does not occur is prevented by that the protectiveness does not occur. sent5: if the scholarliness does not occur then that the Tantricness does not occur and the testifying slob does not occur is not true. sent6: if the psycholinguisticsness does not occur and the irrigation does not occur then the scholarliness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the positiveness does not occur but the Bahainess occurs does not hold then the Bahainess does not occur. sent8: if not the augmentation but the manifold happens then the Balzacianness does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the Tantricness does not occur and the testifying slob does not occur is wrong the concretion happens. sent10: if the Bahai does not occur the psycholinguisticsness does not occur and the irrigation does not occur. sent11: that the protectiveness but not the articularness occurs is triggered by that the concretion happens. sent12: if that the augmentation occurs is right then the hydraulicsness occurs. sent13: that the augmentation does not occur and the manifolding does not occur leads to the non-Balzacianness. sent14: the symbolicness does not occur and the augmentation does not occur if the manifolding happens. sent15: that the giving does not occur is triggered by that the vocalicness and the wave occurs. sent16: the assuming apple does not occur and the testifying slob does not occur. sent17: the non-viaticalness yields that the nimbus and the peal happens. sent18: that the trophicness does not occur is triggered by that the protectiveness and the non-articularness happens. sent19: that not the positive but the Bahai occurs is not correct if the giving does not occur. sent20: the non-hydraulicsness and the non-oceanicness happens if the trophicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the augmentation does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the manifolding happens is false.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the augmentation does not occur and the manifold does not occur.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the Balzacianness does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the augmentation happens.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the hydraulicsness occurs.;
the symbolicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the oceanicness and the hydraulicsness occurs is triggered by that the manifolding does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Balzacianness occurs hold. sent2: the shingling happens if the clamatorialness occurs. sent3: if the protectiveness does not occur both the oceanicness and the trophicness happens. sent4: that the trophicness does not occur is prevented by that the protectiveness does not occur. sent5: if the scholarliness does not occur then that the Tantricness does not occur and the testifying slob does not occur is not true. sent6: if the psycholinguisticsness does not occur and the irrigation does not occur then the scholarliness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the positiveness does not occur but the Bahainess occurs does not hold then the Bahainess does not occur. sent8: if not the augmentation but the manifold happens then the Balzacianness does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the Tantricness does not occur and the testifying slob does not occur is wrong the concretion happens. sent10: if the Bahai does not occur the psycholinguisticsness does not occur and the irrigation does not occur. sent11: that the protectiveness but not the articularness occurs is triggered by that the concretion happens. sent12: if that the augmentation occurs is right then the hydraulicsness occurs. sent13: that the augmentation does not occur and the manifolding does not occur leads to the non-Balzacianness. sent14: the symbolicness does not occur and the augmentation does not occur if the manifolding happens. sent15: that the giving does not occur is triggered by that the vocalicness and the wave occurs. sent16: the assuming apple does not occur and the testifying slob does not occur. sent17: the non-viaticalness yields that the nimbus and the peal happens. sent18: that the trophicness does not occur is triggered by that the protectiveness and the non-articularness happens. sent19: that not the positive but the Bahai occurs is not correct if the giving does not occur. sent20: the non-hydraulicsness and the non-oceanicness happens if the trophicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the augmentation does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the manifolding happens is false.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the augmentation does not occur and the manifold does not occur.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the Balzacianness does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the augmentation happens.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the hydraulicsness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__