the tantalum does freeze-dry bathing.
sent1: that the dynamometer is a kind of a stereoscope but it does not housekeep vindictiveness does not hold if it is not appointive. sent2: the hammerhead is not non-parturient if it is inconclusive. sent3: if something is a kind of a jujutsu then it does freeze-dry bathing. sent4: the gauge is not a cross-fertilization. sent5: if the fact that the hammerhead does not housekeep vindictiveness is not incorrect it is not appointive. sent6: the tantalum is not a kind of a cross-fertilization. sent7: something does not freeze-dry bathing if the fact that it freeze-dry bathing and it is a kind of a stereoscope is incorrect. sent8: something that does housekeep vindictiveness is a kind of a stereoscope. sent9: the cleaners is a kind of a jujutsu if it is a bulgur. sent10: the fact that the tantalum is chiromantic but not conclusive is false if the dynamometer is not a stereoscope. sent11: the hammerhead is a kind of a cross-fertilization that is not a jujutsu if the tantalum does not housekeep vindictiveness. sent12: if something is appointive a jujutsu it is not a kind of a stereoscope. sent13: everything is a stereoscope. sent14: if that something is not appointive is not false it does not housekeep vindictiveness. sent15: that if the tantalum is not inconclusive the tantalum is not pyogenic hold. sent16: everything is chiromantic and it is a stereoscope. sent17: if something is inconclusive it is a jujutsu. sent18: if the hammerhead is inconclusive then it housekeeps vindictiveness. sent19: the hammerhead does not freeze-dry bathing if the fact that the tantalum freeze-dry bathing but it is not chiromantic is not correct. sent20: the hammerhead is a stereoscope. sent21: that if the hammerhead is inconclusive and is chiromantic that the hammerhead is not a kind of a cross-fertilization is correct is true. sent22: if the earplug is a jujutsu then the dynamometer is not appointive but it is a cross-fertilization. sent23: if something is a cross-fertilization it is chiromantic. sent24: the tantalum is both inconclusive and not a cross-fertilization if the hammerhead is not appointive. sent25: the tantalum is not a cross-fertilization if the hammerhead is not appointive.
sent16 -> int1: the hammerhead is a kind of chiromantic thing that is a stereoscope.; sent17 -> int2: the fact that that the tantalum is the jujutsu is true if the tantalum is inconclusive is true.; sent3 -> int3: if the tantalum is a jujutsu it freeze-dries bathing.;
the mullion is not inconclusive.
$hypothesis$ = the tantalum does freeze-dry bathing. ; $context$ = sent1: that the dynamometer is a kind of a stereoscope but it does not housekeep vindictiveness does not hold if it is not appointive. sent2: the hammerhead is not non-parturient if it is inconclusive. sent3: if something is a kind of a jujutsu then it does freeze-dry bathing. sent4: the gauge is not a cross-fertilization. sent5: if the fact that the hammerhead does not housekeep vindictiveness is not incorrect it is not appointive. sent6: the tantalum is not a kind of a cross-fertilization. sent7: something does not freeze-dry bathing if the fact that it freeze-dry bathing and it is a kind of a stereoscope is incorrect. sent8: something that does housekeep vindictiveness is a kind of a stereoscope. sent9: the cleaners is a kind of a jujutsu if it is a bulgur. sent10: the fact that the tantalum is chiromantic but not conclusive is false if the dynamometer is not a stereoscope. sent11: the hammerhead is a kind of a cross-fertilization that is not a jujutsu if the tantalum does not housekeep vindictiveness. sent12: if something is appointive a jujutsu it is not a kind of a stereoscope. sent13: everything is a stereoscope. sent14: if that something is not appointive is not false it does not housekeep vindictiveness. sent15: that if the tantalum is not inconclusive the tantalum is not pyogenic hold. sent16: everything is chiromantic and it is a stereoscope. sent17: if something is inconclusive it is a jujutsu. sent18: if the hammerhead is inconclusive then it housekeeps vindictiveness. sent19: the hammerhead does not freeze-dry bathing if the fact that the tantalum freeze-dry bathing but it is not chiromantic is not correct. sent20: the hammerhead is a stereoscope. sent21: that if the hammerhead is inconclusive and is chiromantic that the hammerhead is not a kind of a cross-fertilization is correct is true. sent22: if the earplug is a jujutsu then the dynamometer is not appointive but it is a cross-fertilization. sent23: if something is a cross-fertilization it is chiromantic. sent24: the tantalum is both inconclusive and not a cross-fertilization if the hammerhead is not appointive. sent25: the tantalum is not a cross-fertilization if the hammerhead is not appointive. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the hammerhead is a kind of chiromantic thing that is a stereoscope.; sent17 -> int2: the fact that that the tantalum is the jujutsu is true if the tantalum is inconclusive is true.; sent3 -> int3: if the tantalum is a jujutsu it freeze-dries bathing.; __UNKNOWN__