the display is an inch.
sent1: everything does spoof quotient and is unimpressionable. sent2: the N is conceptualistic if that the fairground is not nonadsorbent but it is a Rhincodon is wrong. sent3: if something is both gnomic and not non-conceptualistic then it is not a prey. sent4: that the display is a Washingtonian and/or is a dyslectic is false if there is something such that it does not prey. sent5: that everything is unimpressionable is not wrong. sent6: there is nothing such that it is not nonadsorbent and it is a Rhincodon. sent7: if that either something is a kind of a Washingtonian or it is a dyslectic or both is not correct it is not a kind of an inch. sent8: if the rooftop does spoof quotient then the N is gnomic.
sent1 -> int1: the rooftop does spoof quotient and it is unimpressionable.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the rooftop does spoof quotient hold.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the N is gnomic.; sent6 -> int4: that the fairground is not nonadsorbent but a Rhincodon is not correct.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the N is conceptualistic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the N is gnomic thing that is conceptualistic.; sent3 -> int7: if the N is gnomic and is conceptualistic that it is not a kind of a prey is right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the N is not a prey.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it does not prey.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the fact that the display is a kind of a Washingtonian or it is a kind of a dyslectic or both is not correct.; sent7 -> int11: if the fact that either the display is not non-Washingtonian or it is a dyslectic or both is wrong it is not an inch.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the display is an inch. ; $context$ = sent1: everything does spoof quotient and is unimpressionable. sent2: the N is conceptualistic if that the fairground is not nonadsorbent but it is a Rhincodon is wrong. sent3: if something is both gnomic and not non-conceptualistic then it is not a prey. sent4: that the display is a Washingtonian and/or is a dyslectic is false if there is something such that it does not prey. sent5: that everything is unimpressionable is not wrong. sent6: there is nothing such that it is not nonadsorbent and it is a Rhincodon. sent7: if that either something is a kind of a Washingtonian or it is a dyslectic or both is not correct it is not a kind of an inch. sent8: if the rooftop does spoof quotient then the N is gnomic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the rooftop does spoof quotient and it is unimpressionable.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the rooftop does spoof quotient hold.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the N is gnomic.; sent6 -> int4: that the fairground is not nonadsorbent but a Rhincodon is not correct.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the N is conceptualistic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the N is gnomic thing that is conceptualistic.; sent3 -> int7: if the N is gnomic and is conceptualistic that it is not a kind of a prey is right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the N is not a prey.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it does not prey.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the fact that the display is a kind of a Washingtonian or it is a kind of a dyslectic or both is not correct.; sent7 -> int11: if the fact that either the display is not non-Washingtonian or it is a dyslectic or both is wrong it is not an inch.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__