the hafnium is a statute and it uncorks thundering.
sent1: everything does not scant. sent2: the waterway dilapidates praetorium and it does uncork thundering if the hafnium is not a statute. sent3: something does narrate opal and is not a kind of a rijsttaffel if it does not dilapidate praetorium. sent4: that the hafnium is a statute and is a Redding is false. sent5: the fact that everything does not dilapidate praetorium is true. sent6: something is not hydric if it dilapidates praetorium. sent7: the waterway is bromic. sent8: if something does not scant it is a rhenium and Luxemburger. sent9: the fact that the fact that the hafnium is a statute and it does uncork thundering is incorrect if the waterway is not a rijsttaffel is not wrong.
sent3 -> int1: the waterway does narrate opal but it is not a rijsttaffel if it does not dilapidate praetorium.; sent5 -> int2: the waterway does not dilapidate praetorium.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the waterway does narrate opal and is not a rijsttaffel.; int3 -> int4: the waterway is not a kind of a rijsttaffel.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the waterway is not hydric is true.
sent6 -> int5: the waterway is not hydric if it dilapidates praetorium.; sent8 -> int6: the opal is a rhenium and a Luxemburger if it does not scant.; sent1 -> int7: the opal does not scant.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the opal is a kind of a rhenium that is Luxemburger.; int8 -> int9: everything is a rhenium and it is Luxemburger.; int9 -> int10: the aisle is a rhenium that is a Luxemburger.; int10 -> int11: that the aisle is a rhenium is correct.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is a rhenium.;
$hypothesis$ = the hafnium is a statute and it uncorks thundering. ; $context$ = sent1: everything does not scant. sent2: the waterway dilapidates praetorium and it does uncork thundering if the hafnium is not a statute. sent3: something does narrate opal and is not a kind of a rijsttaffel if it does not dilapidate praetorium. sent4: that the hafnium is a statute and is a Redding is false. sent5: the fact that everything does not dilapidate praetorium is true. sent6: something is not hydric if it dilapidates praetorium. sent7: the waterway is bromic. sent8: if something does not scant it is a rhenium and Luxemburger. sent9: the fact that the fact that the hafnium is a statute and it does uncork thundering is incorrect if the waterway is not a rijsttaffel is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the waterway does narrate opal but it is not a rijsttaffel if it does not dilapidate praetorium.; sent5 -> int2: the waterway does not dilapidate praetorium.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the waterway does narrate opal and is not a rijsttaffel.; int3 -> int4: the waterway is not a kind of a rijsttaffel.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__