the bottomland is glossopharyngeal.
sent1: if something is glossopharyngeal the enginery is meritocratic and it is a Keaton. sent2: the bottomland is not a pyralid. sent3: the bottomland is not a kind of a Keaton if it is not a pyralid and is a crochet. sent4: something does not respect BIN if it defaults quilted. sent5: something is not meritocratic if that it does not respect BIN hold. sent6: that the bottomland does not default quilted is correct. sent7: the BIN is acroscopic if the enginery is acroscopic. sent8: if the bottomland is a pyralid and is a crochet then it is not a Keaton. sent9: the BIN is not acroscopic if the bottomland does default quilted and is a clawhammer. sent10: if something is not meritocratic and it is not a Keaton that it is glossopharyngeal hold. sent11: that the enginery is acroscopic is correct. sent12: the BIN is not acroscopic if the bottomland does not default quilted and is a clawhammer. sent13: the bottomland is not a pyralid but it is a crochet. sent14: the fact that the bottomland does default quilted and is a kind of a clawhammer is not true. sent15: the pig is a pyralid. sent16: if something respects BIN then the fact that it does not default quilted and it is colorful is incorrect. sent17: if the enginery does not default quilted and it is not acroscopic it does respect BIN. sent18: that the BIN is meritocratic is true if that it is a Keaton is right. sent19: the fact that that something does not respect BIN and is not acroscopic does not hold if it is meritocratic is not incorrect. sent20: if the bottomland defaults quilted then it does not respect BIN. sent21: if the BIN does respect BIN the bottomland respect BIN. sent22: the lodgepole is glossopharyngeal if the fact that the pig is a kind of a pyralid hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bottomland does not default quilted and is a clawhammer.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the BIN is not acroscopic.; sent7 & sent11 -> int2: the BIN is acroscopic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the bottomland does not default quilted and is a clawhammer does not hold.; sent5 -> int5: if the bottomland does not respect BIN then it is not meritocratic.; sent3 & sent13 -> int6: the bottomland is not a kind of a Keaton.; sent10 -> int7: if the bottomland is not meritocratic and it is not a Keaton it is glossopharyngeal.;
the fact that the bottomland does not default quilted but it is colorful is not true.
sent16 -> int8: the fact that the bottomland does not default quilted but it is colorful is wrong if it respects BIN.; sent19 -> int9: if the enginery is meritocratic the fact that it does not respect BIN and is not acroscopic does not hold.; sent22 & sent15 -> int10: the lodgepole is glossopharyngeal.; int10 -> int11: something is glossopharyngeal.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the enginery is meritocratic and it is a Keaton.; int12 -> int13: the enginery is meritocratic.; int9 & int13 -> int14: that the enginery does not respect BIN and is not acroscopic is false.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it does not respect BIN and is not acroscopic is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the bottomland is glossopharyngeal. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is glossopharyngeal the enginery is meritocratic and it is a Keaton. sent2: the bottomland is not a pyralid. sent3: the bottomland is not a kind of a Keaton if it is not a pyralid and is a crochet. sent4: something does not respect BIN if it defaults quilted. sent5: something is not meritocratic if that it does not respect BIN hold. sent6: that the bottomland does not default quilted is correct. sent7: the BIN is acroscopic if the enginery is acroscopic. sent8: if the bottomland is a pyralid and is a crochet then it is not a Keaton. sent9: the BIN is not acroscopic if the bottomland does default quilted and is a clawhammer. sent10: if something is not meritocratic and it is not a Keaton that it is glossopharyngeal hold. sent11: that the enginery is acroscopic is correct. sent12: the BIN is not acroscopic if the bottomland does not default quilted and is a clawhammer. sent13: the bottomland is not a pyralid but it is a crochet. sent14: the fact that the bottomland does default quilted and is a kind of a clawhammer is not true. sent15: the pig is a pyralid. sent16: if something respects BIN then the fact that it does not default quilted and it is colorful is incorrect. sent17: if the enginery does not default quilted and it is not acroscopic it does respect BIN. sent18: that the BIN is meritocratic is true if that it is a Keaton is right. sent19: the fact that that something does not respect BIN and is not acroscopic does not hold if it is meritocratic is not incorrect. sent20: if the bottomland defaults quilted then it does not respect BIN. sent21: if the BIN does respect BIN the bottomland respect BIN. sent22: the lodgepole is glossopharyngeal if the fact that the pig is a kind of a pyralid hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bottomland does not default quilted and is a clawhammer.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the BIN is not acroscopic.; sent7 & sent11 -> int2: the BIN is acroscopic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the bottomland does not default quilted and is a clawhammer does not hold.; sent5 -> int5: if the bottomland does not respect BIN then it is not meritocratic.; sent3 & sent13 -> int6: the bottomland is not a kind of a Keaton.; sent10 -> int7: if the bottomland is not meritocratic and it is not a Keaton it is glossopharyngeal.; __UNKNOWN__