there is something such that it does not decimalize and is not non-vestal.
sent1: the linecut does not decimalize if the Hogg is a CDC. sent2: the Hogg is a kind of a CDC if the ex-wife is not non-immunosuppressive. sent3: something is vestal. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not decimalize is not wrong. sent5: the linecut does not decimalize and is not non-vestal if the Hogg is a CDC. sent6: the linecut is immunosuppressive if the Hogg is immunosuppressive. sent7: if the fact that something does avoid antiarrhythmic and is not a CDC does not hold it does not avoid antiarrhythmic. sent8: the fact that the linecut is Ionic hold. sent9: if the ex-wife decimalizes the linecut does avoid antiarrhythmic. sent10: the Hogg is a CDC if the ex-wife avoids antiarrhythmic. sent11: something does not decimalize but it is a CDC. sent12: the fact that the ex-wife is immunosuppressive hold if the linecut avoids antiarrhythmic. sent13: if the linecut is immunosuppressive then the fact that it avoids antiarrhythmic and is not a kind of a CDC is not true. sent14: the linecut does not decimalize. sent15: if the Hogg is immunosuppressive that the ex-wife is a kind of a CDC is not false. sent16: the ex-wife either avoids antiarrhythmic or is immunosuppressive or both. sent17: either the woofer telescopes or it is new or both. sent18: there is something such that that it does decimalize and it is a kind of a vestal is not wrong. sent19: if the Hogg is a kind of a vestal then the linecut does not decimalize and is a CDC.
sent16 & sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the Hogg is a kind of a CDC.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the linecut does not decimalize but it is a vestal.; int2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is not a subscription and it antisepticizes skivvy.
sent7 -> int3: if that the linecut does avoid antiarrhythmic but it is not a CDC is incorrect it does not avoid antiarrhythmic.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does not decimalize and is not non-vestal. ; $context$ = sent1: the linecut does not decimalize if the Hogg is a CDC. sent2: the Hogg is a kind of a CDC if the ex-wife is not non-immunosuppressive. sent3: something is vestal. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not decimalize is not wrong. sent5: the linecut does not decimalize and is not non-vestal if the Hogg is a CDC. sent6: the linecut is immunosuppressive if the Hogg is immunosuppressive. sent7: if the fact that something does avoid antiarrhythmic and is not a CDC does not hold it does not avoid antiarrhythmic. sent8: the fact that the linecut is Ionic hold. sent9: if the ex-wife decimalizes the linecut does avoid antiarrhythmic. sent10: the Hogg is a CDC if the ex-wife avoids antiarrhythmic. sent11: something does not decimalize but it is a CDC. sent12: the fact that the ex-wife is immunosuppressive hold if the linecut avoids antiarrhythmic. sent13: if the linecut is immunosuppressive then the fact that it avoids antiarrhythmic and is not a kind of a CDC is not true. sent14: the linecut does not decimalize. sent15: if the Hogg is immunosuppressive that the ex-wife is a kind of a CDC is not false. sent16: the ex-wife either avoids antiarrhythmic or is immunosuppressive or both. sent17: either the woofer telescopes or it is new or both. sent18: there is something such that that it does decimalize and it is a kind of a vestal is not wrong. sent19: if the Hogg is a kind of a vestal then the linecut does not decimalize and is a CDC. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the Hogg is a kind of a CDC.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the linecut does not decimalize but it is a vestal.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__