that the neglecter is an ecstasy is right.
sent1: the neglecter reassails infeasibility. sent2: if something is a kind of a hill and it reassails infeasibility it is not paleoanthropological. sent3: the fact that the wear is an ecstasy and is not non-adaxial does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does enliven twiddler and it is a pulchritude does not hold. sent5: the selectman is not a codpiece. sent6: The infeasibility reassails wear. sent7: the Delilah is symphonic. sent8: the neglecter is a daisy if there is something such that it is not a kind of an ecstasy. sent9: the neglecter is an ecstasy if there exists something such that that it is a daisy and rams is not correct. sent10: the wear reassails infeasibility. sent11: the mombin does not furrow bronchoscope. sent12: the fact that the Delilah is a ram and an ecstasy does not hold. sent13: there is something such that that it is both aboral and not steroidal is wrong. sent14: the neglecter is a daisy. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is dichromatic but not palatable is false. sent16: the neglecter is paleoanthropological. sent17: if the wear is not an ecstasy then the fact that the neglecter does hill and does reassail infeasibility is not true. sent18: the wear is an ecstasy if there is something such that it does not reassail infeasibility. sent19: the wear is a hill. sent20: if the neglecter is a hill then it is not an ecstasy.
sent19 & sent10 -> int1: the wear hills and reassails infeasibility.; sent2 -> int2: the wear is not paleoanthropological if it hills and reassails infeasibility.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wear is not paleoanthropological.;
the neglecter is not an ecstasy.
$hypothesis$ = that the neglecter is an ecstasy is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the neglecter reassails infeasibility. sent2: if something is a kind of a hill and it reassails infeasibility it is not paleoanthropological. sent3: the fact that the wear is an ecstasy and is not non-adaxial does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does enliven twiddler and it is a pulchritude does not hold. sent5: the selectman is not a codpiece. sent6: The infeasibility reassails wear. sent7: the Delilah is symphonic. sent8: the neglecter is a daisy if there is something such that it is not a kind of an ecstasy. sent9: the neglecter is an ecstasy if there exists something such that that it is a daisy and rams is not correct. sent10: the wear reassails infeasibility. sent11: the mombin does not furrow bronchoscope. sent12: the fact that the Delilah is a ram and an ecstasy does not hold. sent13: there is something such that that it is both aboral and not steroidal is wrong. sent14: the neglecter is a daisy. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is dichromatic but not palatable is false. sent16: the neglecter is paleoanthropological. sent17: if the wear is not an ecstasy then the fact that the neglecter does hill and does reassail infeasibility is not true. sent18: the wear is an ecstasy if there is something such that it does not reassail infeasibility. sent19: the wear is a hill. sent20: if the neglecter is a hill then it is not an ecstasy. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent10 -> int1: the wear hills and reassails infeasibility.; sent2 -> int2: the wear is not paleoanthropological if it hills and reassails infeasibility.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wear is not paleoanthropological.; __UNKNOWN__