the fact that the floodplain is not an eagerness and is liturgical is not right.
sent1: that the fact that the panfish is not non-liturgical and it is an external is not false is not right. sent2: the boucle is mucinoid but it does not volunteer if it is not incompressible. sent3: the boucle is not incompressible. sent4: that the floodplain is a kind of an eagerness and it is liturgical does not hold. sent5: the stoneware is not a Provence if that the bachelor is a blubber that is polytheistic does not hold. sent6: that the floodplain is not a kind of an eagerness and is liturgical is not correct if the cabinet does not capsule damask. sent7: the fact that if the cabinet capsules damask the floodplain is not an eagerness and not non-liturgical hold. sent8: the fact that the cabinet is not an eagerness and capsules damask is not true. sent9: the fact that the berkelium does not capsule damask but it is a Tayassuidae is not correct if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Tayassuidae. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the floodplain is not an eagerness hold then the fact that the cabinet is liturgical and it capsules damask is wrong is right. sent11: a joggle does capsule damask. sent12: if there is something such that it does joggle the cabinet is not a Tayassuidae. sent13: The damask does not capsule cabinet. sent14: the cabinet does not capsule damask.
sent6 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the floodplain is not a kind of an eagerness but it is liturgical.
sent11 -> int1: if the cabinet is a kind of a joggle it capsules damask.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the boucle is mucinoid and is not a volunteer.; int2 -> int3: the boucle is mucinoid.; int3 -> int4: there are mucinoid things.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the floodplain is not an eagerness and is liturgical is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the panfish is not non-liturgical and it is an external is not false is not right. sent2: the boucle is mucinoid but it does not volunteer if it is not incompressible. sent3: the boucle is not incompressible. sent4: that the floodplain is a kind of an eagerness and it is liturgical does not hold. sent5: the stoneware is not a Provence if that the bachelor is a blubber that is polytheistic does not hold. sent6: that the floodplain is not a kind of an eagerness and is liturgical is not correct if the cabinet does not capsule damask. sent7: the fact that if the cabinet capsules damask the floodplain is not an eagerness and not non-liturgical hold. sent8: the fact that the cabinet is not an eagerness and capsules damask is not true. sent9: the fact that the berkelium does not capsule damask but it is a Tayassuidae is not correct if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Tayassuidae. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the floodplain is not an eagerness hold then the fact that the cabinet is liturgical and it capsules damask is wrong is right. sent11: a joggle does capsule damask. sent12: if there is something such that it does joggle the cabinet is not a Tayassuidae. sent13: The damask does not capsule cabinet. sent14: the cabinet does not capsule damask. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__