the nonsense is not an admirer or it is not a Palaquium or both.
sent1: the tupelo is chancrous. sent2: the tupelo is polytheistic. sent3: the jassid is not non-logistics if it personifies nonsense. sent4: the jassid does personify nonsense and it is chancrous. sent5: if something is homosexual and it is polytheistic then the nonsense is not an admirer. sent6: the jassid is chancrous.
sent4 -> int1: the jassid does personify nonsense.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the jassid is logistics.;
$hypothesis$ = the nonsense is not an admirer or it is not a Palaquium or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the tupelo is chancrous. sent2: the tupelo is polytheistic. sent3: the jassid is not non-logistics if it personifies nonsense. sent4: the jassid does personify nonsense and it is chancrous. sent5: if something is homosexual and it is polytheistic then the nonsense is not an admirer. sent6: the jassid is chancrous. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the jassid does personify nonsense.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the jassid is logistics.; __UNKNOWN__