there is something such that it is non-spondaic thing that is allomerous.
sent1: that the confectionery does not lamb leader and it is not a snowball is wrong if it is a kind of a Amentiferae. sent2: something that is a valved turns Scolytidae. sent3: that something is both not a Shahaptian and a pahoehoe is false if it is not tabular. sent4: if that the lipoprotein is not allomerous is right then it does not turn Scolytidae and it is not a valved. sent5: the lipoprotein is a kind of a valved if it is spondaic. sent6: the pottery is not spondaic but a Hermosillo. sent7: if the DMZ does not lamb DMZ the fact that the pottery is a sideroblast but not allomerous is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the confectionery is not a Shahaptian and is a pahoehoe is incorrect then the grunt is a Shahaptian. sent9: that the cobweb is spondaic is not wrong if something does not turn Scolytidae and is not a kind of a valved. sent10: something is an armband if that it is a splenomegaly is not wrong. sent11: there exists something such that it is not spondaic. sent12: the monologist is not allomerous. sent13: if the fact that the lipoprotein is not spondaic hold then the pottery is not spondaic. sent14: if the fact that the confectionery does not lamb leader and it is not a snowball is not correct then it is non-tabular. sent15: if the lipoprotein is not spondaic then the pottery is not spondaic but it is not non-allomerous. sent16: the DMZ is a kind of a Hermosillo. sent17: if that the grunt is a Shahaptian hold that the DMZ is not a kind of a Hermosillo and does lamb DMZ is incorrect. sent18: if the DMZ is a Hermosillo that the lipoprotein lambs DMZ but it is not a sideroblast is not true. sent19: the lipoprotein is not allomerous if the fact that that the pottery is a sideroblast but it is not allomerous is not wrong is false. sent20: if the fact that something lambs DMZ and is not a kind of a sideroblast is not correct then that it does not turn Scolytidae is not false. sent21: that that the pottery is allomerous thing that is not a kind of a sideroblast does not hold is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lipoprotein is spondaic.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the lipoprotein is a valved is not false.; sent2 -> int2: the lipoprotein does turn Scolytidae if it is a valved.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lipoprotein turns Scolytidae.; sent20 -> int4: if the fact that the lipoprotein does lamb DMZ and is not a sideroblast does not hold it does not turn Scolytidae.; sent18 & sent16 -> int5: that the lipoprotein does lamb DMZ but it is not a sideroblast is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lipoprotein does not turn Scolytidae.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the lipoprotein is not spondaic.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the pottery is both non-spondaic and allomerous.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cobweb is spondaic is right.
sent3 -> int10: if the confectionery is not tabular the fact that it is not a Shahaptian but a pahoehoe does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is non-spondaic thing that is allomerous. ; $context$ = sent1: that the confectionery does not lamb leader and it is not a snowball is wrong if it is a kind of a Amentiferae. sent2: something that is a valved turns Scolytidae. sent3: that something is both not a Shahaptian and a pahoehoe is false if it is not tabular. sent4: if that the lipoprotein is not allomerous is right then it does not turn Scolytidae and it is not a valved. sent5: the lipoprotein is a kind of a valved if it is spondaic. sent6: the pottery is not spondaic but a Hermosillo. sent7: if the DMZ does not lamb DMZ the fact that the pottery is a sideroblast but not allomerous is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the confectionery is not a Shahaptian and is a pahoehoe is incorrect then the grunt is a Shahaptian. sent9: that the cobweb is spondaic is not wrong if something does not turn Scolytidae and is not a kind of a valved. sent10: something is an armband if that it is a splenomegaly is not wrong. sent11: there exists something such that it is not spondaic. sent12: the monologist is not allomerous. sent13: if the fact that the lipoprotein is not spondaic hold then the pottery is not spondaic. sent14: if the fact that the confectionery does not lamb leader and it is not a snowball is not correct then it is non-tabular. sent15: if the lipoprotein is not spondaic then the pottery is not spondaic but it is not non-allomerous. sent16: the DMZ is a kind of a Hermosillo. sent17: if that the grunt is a Shahaptian hold that the DMZ is not a kind of a Hermosillo and does lamb DMZ is incorrect. sent18: if the DMZ is a Hermosillo that the lipoprotein lambs DMZ but it is not a sideroblast is not true. sent19: the lipoprotein is not allomerous if the fact that that the pottery is a sideroblast but it is not allomerous is not wrong is false. sent20: if the fact that something lambs DMZ and is not a kind of a sideroblast is not correct then that it does not turn Scolytidae is not false. sent21: that that the pottery is allomerous thing that is not a kind of a sideroblast does not hold is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lipoprotein is spondaic.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the lipoprotein is a valved is not false.; sent2 -> int2: the lipoprotein does turn Scolytidae if it is a valved.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lipoprotein turns Scolytidae.; sent20 -> int4: if the fact that the lipoprotein does lamb DMZ and is not a sideroblast does not hold it does not turn Scolytidae.; sent18 & sent16 -> int5: that the lipoprotein does lamb DMZ but it is not a sideroblast is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lipoprotein does not turn Scolytidae.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the lipoprotein is not spondaic.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the pottery is both non-spondaic and allomerous.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__