the fact that the grigri does not gauge Crown and is photoconductive is incorrect.
sent1: something is a Black if it is an intersection. sent2: if the Crown is not a Monitor then the grigri does not gauge Crown and is photoconductive. sent3: the fact that the assayer is a decrepitude and gauges Crown is not right. sent4: the fact that the assayer is a kind of a decrepitude that does overawe rheology is false. sent5: the Crown is not a Mauritius if something is agranulocytic. sent6: the beast is agranulocytic. sent7: if the Crown is an intersection and is a Monitor then it does not negate grope. sent8: the fact that something does not gauge Crown and is not non-photoconductive does not hold if it is not a kind of a Black. sent9: if the assayer is an intersection then the fact that the Crown overawes rheology hold. sent10: the Crown is an intersection if the stout is a Black. sent11: the stout is a Black if there is something such that that it is a kind of a decrepitude and it overawes rheology does not hold. sent12: if the Crown is not a Mauritius then it does negate grope and is a kind of a Algonquian.
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a decrepitude and it does overawe rheology is wrong.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the stout is a Black.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the Crown is an intersection.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Crown is a Monitor.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the Crown is an intersection and a Monitor.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: that the Crown does not negate grope is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int6: there is something such that it is agranulocytic.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the Crown is not a Mauritius.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the Crown negates grope and it is a Algonquian.; int8 -> int9: the Crown does negate grope.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the Crown is not a kind of a Monitor.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the grigri does not gauge Crown and is photoconductive is incorrect.
sent8 -> int12: that the grigri does not gauge Crown but it is not non-photoconductive is not true if it is not a Black.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the grigri does not gauge Crown and is photoconductive is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Black if it is an intersection. sent2: if the Crown is not a Monitor then the grigri does not gauge Crown and is photoconductive. sent3: the fact that the assayer is a decrepitude and gauges Crown is not right. sent4: the fact that the assayer is a kind of a decrepitude that does overawe rheology is false. sent5: the Crown is not a Mauritius if something is agranulocytic. sent6: the beast is agranulocytic. sent7: if the Crown is an intersection and is a Monitor then it does not negate grope. sent8: the fact that something does not gauge Crown and is not non-photoconductive does not hold if it is not a kind of a Black. sent9: if the assayer is an intersection then the fact that the Crown overawes rheology hold. sent10: the Crown is an intersection if the stout is a Black. sent11: the stout is a Black if there is something such that that it is a kind of a decrepitude and it overawes rheology does not hold. sent12: if the Crown is not a Mauritius then it does negate grope and is a kind of a Algonquian. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a decrepitude and it does overawe rheology is wrong.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the stout is a Black.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the Crown is an intersection.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Crown is a Monitor.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the Crown is an intersection and a Monitor.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: that the Crown does not negate grope is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int6: there is something such that it is agranulocytic.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the Crown is not a Mauritius.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the Crown negates grope and it is a Algonquian.; int8 -> int9: the Crown does negate grope.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the Crown is not a kind of a Monitor.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__