the time-releaseness does not occur.
sent1: the capping occurs and the ascending occurs. sent2: the counterpointing policewoman does not occur if the fact that the shrinkableness and the counterpointing policewoman occurs is not right. sent3: the achondriticness happens and the braying occurs if the affirmation does not occur. sent4: both the Mormonsness and the snap occurs. sent5: the horripilating and the achondriticness happens. sent6: the benevolence happens. sent7: that both the reproducibleness and the sophisticating conacaste occurs results in that the rewriting preoccupation does not occur. sent8: that both the horripilating and the rap happens is caused by that the cap does not occur. sent9: if the affirmation does not occur then the ascending happens and the cap happens. sent10: the ascending happens. sent11: the yoga and the sophisticating vasoconstrictor occurs if the counterpointing policewoman does not occur. sent12: the time-releaseness does not occur if that the horripilating happens and the cap happens is correct. sent13: if the ascending does not occur and the time-releaseness does not occur then the fact that the capping does not occur is not wrong. sent14: if both the counterpointing policewoman and the draping accomplice happens the wrong does not occur. sent15: the Marxistness does not occur. sent16: the fact that the draping Kami does not occur is correct. sent17: that if the sophisticating vasoconstrictor happens then the ascending does not occur and the time-releaseness does not occur hold. sent18: if the achondriticness does not occur the time-releaseness happens and the horripilating happens. sent19: the enthusiasticness and the expressionistness occurs. sent20: that the branchialness does not occur is brought about by that the halo occurs and the draping Rhine happens. sent21: the draping polarography happens and the feverishness occurs. sent22: the achondriticness happens.
sent5 -> int1: the horripilating happens.; sent1 -> int2: the cap happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the horripilating and the cap occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
both the rapping and the bray occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the time-releaseness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the capping occurs and the ascending occurs. sent2: the counterpointing policewoman does not occur if the fact that the shrinkableness and the counterpointing policewoman occurs is not right. sent3: the achondriticness happens and the braying occurs if the affirmation does not occur. sent4: both the Mormonsness and the snap occurs. sent5: the horripilating and the achondriticness happens. sent6: the benevolence happens. sent7: that both the reproducibleness and the sophisticating conacaste occurs results in that the rewriting preoccupation does not occur. sent8: that both the horripilating and the rap happens is caused by that the cap does not occur. sent9: if the affirmation does not occur then the ascending happens and the cap happens. sent10: the ascending happens. sent11: the yoga and the sophisticating vasoconstrictor occurs if the counterpointing policewoman does not occur. sent12: the time-releaseness does not occur if that the horripilating happens and the cap happens is correct. sent13: if the ascending does not occur and the time-releaseness does not occur then the fact that the capping does not occur is not wrong. sent14: if both the counterpointing policewoman and the draping accomplice happens the wrong does not occur. sent15: the Marxistness does not occur. sent16: the fact that the draping Kami does not occur is correct. sent17: that if the sophisticating vasoconstrictor happens then the ascending does not occur and the time-releaseness does not occur hold. sent18: if the achondriticness does not occur the time-releaseness happens and the horripilating happens. sent19: the enthusiasticness and the expressionistness occurs. sent20: that the branchialness does not occur is brought about by that the halo occurs and the draping Rhine happens. sent21: the draping polarography happens and the feverishness occurs. sent22: the achondriticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the horripilating happens.; sent1 -> int2: the cap happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the horripilating and the cap occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__