the loss does not occur.
sent1: the starriness occurs. sent2: the pumping happens. sent3: the narrowed and the bipolarness happens. sent4: that the bipolarness does not occur triggers that the passerineness happens and the lupine occurs. sent5: that the Papuanness happens is not wrong. sent6: the cross-sectionalness occurs. sent7: both the loss and the bedlessness occurs if the bowing nutrient does not occur. sent8: if the starriness does not occur not the bowing nutrient but the modifiableness happens. sent9: if the fact that both the non-dysphoricness and the magnetizing cosmographer happens is not correct that the magnetizing cosmographer does not occur is true. sent10: the fact that both the bedlessness and the bowing nutrient occurs is not incorrect. sent11: if that the magnetizing cosmographer does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the starriness does not occur and the bowing Nefud does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the modifiableness is prevented by that both the bedlessness and the loss occurs. sent13: that the bowing Nefud does not occur causes that the starriness happens and the modifiableness occurs. sent14: if the unargumentativeness happens and the orthopticsness happens then the colloquium does not occur. sent15: both the Down and the chordateness happens. sent16: the fact that the bowing nutrient happens is correct. sent17: that the starriness does not occur is prevented by that the bowing Nefud does not occur. sent18: the inarticulateness does not occur. sent19: that the systematization happens and the accreting occurs is caused by the unchangeableness.
sent10 -> int1: the bedlessness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the loss occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that both the bedlessness and the loss occurs is not false.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the modifiableness does not occur.;
the loss happens.
$hypothesis$ = the loss does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the starriness occurs. sent2: the pumping happens. sent3: the narrowed and the bipolarness happens. sent4: that the bipolarness does not occur triggers that the passerineness happens and the lupine occurs. sent5: that the Papuanness happens is not wrong. sent6: the cross-sectionalness occurs. sent7: both the loss and the bedlessness occurs if the bowing nutrient does not occur. sent8: if the starriness does not occur not the bowing nutrient but the modifiableness happens. sent9: if the fact that both the non-dysphoricness and the magnetizing cosmographer happens is not correct that the magnetizing cosmographer does not occur is true. sent10: the fact that both the bedlessness and the bowing nutrient occurs is not incorrect. sent11: if that the magnetizing cosmographer does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the starriness does not occur and the bowing Nefud does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the modifiableness is prevented by that both the bedlessness and the loss occurs. sent13: that the bowing Nefud does not occur causes that the starriness happens and the modifiableness occurs. sent14: if the unargumentativeness happens and the orthopticsness happens then the colloquium does not occur. sent15: both the Down and the chordateness happens. sent16: the fact that the bowing nutrient happens is correct. sent17: that the starriness does not occur is prevented by that the bowing Nefud does not occur. sent18: the inarticulateness does not occur. sent19: that the systematization happens and the accreting occurs is caused by the unchangeableness. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the bedlessness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the loss occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that both the bedlessness and the loss occurs is not false.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the modifiableness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__