if the utterer does not dropkick comeliness and it is not photomechanical then the fact that the scuffle sails hold.
sent1: the scuffle sails if the patroller is not correlational. sent2: the clay is not differentiable if the fact that it does not update point and is not a mixology does not hold. sent3: the scuffle sails if that the patroller is correlational but it is not differentiable is incorrect. sent4: if the patroller is differentiable then that the clay is a kind of a mixology that does not update point does not hold. sent5: the shegetz is not a Baikal if the fact that it is mandibular and not Bosnian hold. sent6: the fact that the shegetz either does update URL or is a kind of a torso or both is wrong if it is not a Baikal. sent7: if the fact that something does update URL or it is a torso or both is false it does not wind tax. sent8: if the clay is not differentiable then that the patroller is correlational but it is not differentiable is not true. sent9: if the utterer does not dropkick comeliness but it is photomechanical then the scuffle is a kind of a sailing. sent10: if something that does not dropkick comeliness is not photomechanical it is not a mixology. sent11: the utterer is not a kind of a mixology if it does not dropkick comeliness and is photomechanical. sent12: the utterer is not photomechanical. sent13: the fact that the clay updates point but it is not a kind of a mixology is not correct. sent14: the scuffle is photomechanical if there exists something such that the fact that it is a mixology that does not update point is not true. sent15: if something that does not dropkick comeliness is photomechanical it is not a kind of a mixology. sent16: if something does not wind tax then the fact that it does sail and it is unsavory is not true. sent17: if the utterer dropkicks comeliness and is not photomechanical then it is not a mixology. sent18: the shegetz is mandibular and is non-Bosnian. sent19: if the utterer is not a mixology then that the clay does not update point and is not a mixology is not true. sent20: that the clay does not update point and is a mixology is not true if the utterer is not a mixology. sent21: if the utterer is not a mixology then the fact that the clay does update point but it is not a mixology does not hold. sent22: if the utterer dropkicks comeliness and is not photomechanical then the scuffle is a kind of a sailing. sent23: if the fact that the termer is not a sailing is not wrong then the patroller is differentiable but not non-correlational. sent24: that the clay does not update point but it is a mixology does not hold.
sent10 -> int1: if the utterer does not dropkick comeliness and it is not photomechanical then it is not a mixology.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the utterer does not dropkick comeliness and is not photomechanical.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the utterer is not a mixology.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the fact that the clay does not update point and is not a mixology is not correct.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the clay is not differentiable hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: that the patroller is correlational but it is not differentiable is incorrect.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the scuffle sails.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the scuffle is photomechanical.
sent16 -> int7: that the shegetz is a kind of a sailing and it is unsavory is not true if it does not wind tax.; sent7 -> int8: the shegetz does not wind tax if the fact that it does update URL and/or is a torso is wrong.; sent5 & sent18 -> int9: that the shegetz is not a Baikal is not wrong.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the shegetz does update URL and/or is a kind of a torso is not true.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the shegetz does not wind tax is not false.; int7 & int11 -> int12: that the shegetz does sail and it is unsavory does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a sailing and it is unsavory is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = if the utterer does not dropkick comeliness and it is not photomechanical then the fact that the scuffle sails hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the scuffle sails if the patroller is not correlational. sent2: the clay is not differentiable if the fact that it does not update point and is not a mixology does not hold. sent3: the scuffle sails if that the patroller is correlational but it is not differentiable is incorrect. sent4: if the patroller is differentiable then that the clay is a kind of a mixology that does not update point does not hold. sent5: the shegetz is not a Baikal if the fact that it is mandibular and not Bosnian hold. sent6: the fact that the shegetz either does update URL or is a kind of a torso or both is wrong if it is not a Baikal. sent7: if the fact that something does update URL or it is a torso or both is false it does not wind tax. sent8: if the clay is not differentiable then that the patroller is correlational but it is not differentiable is not true. sent9: if the utterer does not dropkick comeliness but it is photomechanical then the scuffle is a kind of a sailing. sent10: if something that does not dropkick comeliness is not photomechanical it is not a mixology. sent11: the utterer is not a kind of a mixology if it does not dropkick comeliness and is photomechanical. sent12: the utterer is not photomechanical. sent13: the fact that the clay updates point but it is not a kind of a mixology is not correct. sent14: the scuffle is photomechanical if there exists something such that the fact that it is a mixology that does not update point is not true. sent15: if something that does not dropkick comeliness is photomechanical it is not a kind of a mixology. sent16: if something does not wind tax then the fact that it does sail and it is unsavory is not true. sent17: if the utterer dropkicks comeliness and is not photomechanical then it is not a mixology. sent18: the shegetz is mandibular and is non-Bosnian. sent19: if the utterer is not a mixology then that the clay does not update point and is not a mixology is not true. sent20: that the clay does not update point and is a mixology is not true if the utterer is not a mixology. sent21: if the utterer is not a mixology then the fact that the clay does update point but it is not a mixology does not hold. sent22: if the utterer dropkicks comeliness and is not photomechanical then the scuffle is a kind of a sailing. sent23: if the fact that the termer is not a sailing is not wrong then the patroller is differentiable but not non-correlational. sent24: that the clay does not update point but it is a mixology does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the utterer does not dropkick comeliness and it is not photomechanical then it is not a mixology.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the utterer does not dropkick comeliness and is not photomechanical.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the utterer is not a mixology.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the fact that the clay does not update point and is not a mixology is not correct.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the clay is not differentiable hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: that the patroller is correlational but it is not differentiable is incorrect.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the scuffle sails.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__