the officeholder is a kind of a miser.
sent1: the pitchfork is both not a hum and robotics if the adventurer is unable. sent2: if the detergent does not restart Topeka and it is not arborical the egg-and-dart is arborical. sent3: the fact that the grampus is not a Lucy and does include Wyler does not hold if there is something such that it is a stickball. sent4: the fact that the fact that the pitchfork is not a kind of a tetany and gratifies does not hold is correct if the benefactress is a kind of a alpha-naphthol. sent5: that the fat is a kind of a mass that is not unlawful does not hold if there are arborical things. sent6: if a Lucy is not a kind of a alpha-naphthol that it is a kind of a miser hold. sent7: if the adventurer is not unable the officeholder is a kind of a Lucy that is not a alpha-naphthol. sent8: that the benefactress does not gratify and it is not a hum does not hold if the pitchfork is not a hum. sent9: that something is both not a daycare and not a stickball is not correct if it is biotypic. sent10: the officeholder is not a kind of a miser if the adventurer is a miser and/or it is not able. sent11: the fact that the benefactress does not include Wyler and is a stickball is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the benefactress does not gratify and is a kind of a hum is not true. sent13: if the fact that the benefactress does not include Wyler and is a stickball is false it is not a tetany. sent14: if the fact that the fat is a mass but it is not unlawful is wrong then the spouse is biotypic. sent15: if the officeholder is a Lucy and it is a alpha-naphthol it is a miser. sent16: if the fact that something does not gratify and does not hum is wrong then it is a tetany. sent17: the benefactress is a alpha-naphthol if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Lucy and it includes Wyler does not hold. sent18: the detergent does not restart Topeka and it is non-arborical. sent19: if something does not gratify it is a miser and/or unable. sent20: if that the spouse is not a daycare and is not a kind of a stickball is not true then the fog is a stickball. sent21: something is a kind of a tetany if it is a hum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adventurer is unable.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the pitchfork is both not a hum and robotics.; int1 -> int2: the pitchfork is not a hum.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the benefactress does not gratify and it does not hum does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: if the fact that the benefactress does not gratify and is not a hum is false it is a tetany.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the benefactress is a tetany.; sent13 & sent11 -> int6: the benefactress is not a tetany.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the adventurer is not unable.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the officeholder is a Lucy but it is not a alpha-naphthol.; sent6 -> int10: the officeholder is a miser if it is a Lucy and it is not a alpha-naphthol.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the officeholder is not a kind of a miser.
sent19 -> int11: the adventurer is a miser or unable or both if it does not gratify.; sent9 -> int12: if the spouse is biotypic then the fact that that it is not a kind of a daycare and it is not a stickball is not incorrect is not correct.; sent2 & sent18 -> int13: the egg-and-dart is arborical.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is arborical.; int14 & sent5 -> int15: that the fat is a mass but not unlawful is not true.; sent14 & int15 -> int16: that the spouse is biotypic hold.; int12 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the spouse is both not a daycare and not a stickball is not right.; sent20 & int17 -> int18: the fog is a kind of a stickball.; int18 -> int19: the fact that something is a kind of a stickball hold.; int19 & sent3 -> int20: that the fact that the grampus is not a kind of a Lucy but it includes Wyler is not false is not correct.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Lucy and it includes Wyler does not hold.; int21 & sent17 -> int22: the benefactress is a alpha-naphthol.; sent4 & int22 -> int23: that the pitchfork is not a kind of a tetany and gratifies is false.; int23 -> int24: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a tetany and it gratifies is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the officeholder is a kind of a miser. ; $context$ = sent1: the pitchfork is both not a hum and robotics if the adventurer is unable. sent2: if the detergent does not restart Topeka and it is not arborical the egg-and-dart is arborical. sent3: the fact that the grampus is not a Lucy and does include Wyler does not hold if there is something such that it is a stickball. sent4: the fact that the fact that the pitchfork is not a kind of a tetany and gratifies does not hold is correct if the benefactress is a kind of a alpha-naphthol. sent5: that the fat is a kind of a mass that is not unlawful does not hold if there are arborical things. sent6: if a Lucy is not a kind of a alpha-naphthol that it is a kind of a miser hold. sent7: if the adventurer is not unable the officeholder is a kind of a Lucy that is not a alpha-naphthol. sent8: that the benefactress does not gratify and it is not a hum does not hold if the pitchfork is not a hum. sent9: that something is both not a daycare and not a stickball is not correct if it is biotypic. sent10: the officeholder is not a kind of a miser if the adventurer is a miser and/or it is not able. sent11: the fact that the benefactress does not include Wyler and is a stickball is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the benefactress does not gratify and is a kind of a hum is not true. sent13: if the fact that the benefactress does not include Wyler and is a stickball is false it is not a tetany. sent14: if the fact that the fat is a mass but it is not unlawful is wrong then the spouse is biotypic. sent15: if the officeholder is a Lucy and it is a alpha-naphthol it is a miser. sent16: if the fact that something does not gratify and does not hum is wrong then it is a tetany. sent17: the benefactress is a alpha-naphthol if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Lucy and it includes Wyler does not hold. sent18: the detergent does not restart Topeka and it is non-arborical. sent19: if something does not gratify it is a miser and/or unable. sent20: if that the spouse is not a daycare and is not a kind of a stickball is not true then the fog is a stickball. sent21: something is a kind of a tetany if it is a hum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adventurer is unable.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the pitchfork is both not a hum and robotics.; int1 -> int2: the pitchfork is not a hum.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the benefactress does not gratify and it does not hum does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: if the fact that the benefactress does not gratify and is not a hum is false it is a tetany.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the benefactress is a tetany.; sent13 & sent11 -> int6: the benefactress is not a tetany.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the adventurer is not unable.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the officeholder is a Lucy but it is not a alpha-naphthol.; sent6 -> int10: the officeholder is a miser if it is a Lucy and it is not a alpha-naphthol.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__