the Girondist is a bandicoot.
sent1: something bullshits if it is a Thraupidae. sent2: something that is futuristic defibrillates worry. sent3: if the Girondist is thermal the walk-on does bullshit. sent4: if something is not a bullshit and defibrillates worry it is not a Thraupidae. sent5: if the wing-nut is not electrostatics the vol-au-vent defibrillates worry. sent6: that the vol-au-vent is a kind of a Thraupidae is not wrong. sent7: the Girondist is a colorist if the teliospore is futuristic. sent8: if the walk-on is not an affrication that the fact that it is both non-precocious and not nonthermal is right is wrong. sent9: the wing-nut is not electrostatics if the walk-on is precocious. sent10: the Girondist is not a crotch. sent11: the fact that the teliospore is not electrostatics but it is futuristic does not hold. sent12: if something is not a Thraupidae that it is an affrication and it is not electrostatics is not right. sent13: if that the walk-on is not precocious but it is a kind of a thermal is false the wing-nut is not electrostatics. sent14: the Girondist is precocious. sent15: the walk-on is not a bullshit but it does defibrillate worry if it is not a colorist. sent16: the wing-nut is not a kind of a thermal. sent17: the vol-au-vent defibrillates worry and is electrostatics if the wing-nut is not electrostatics. sent18: if something is not a Godunov the fact that it is not a lapin and is futuristic is wrong. sent19: that the walk-on is a kind of precocious thing that is a thermal is incorrect if it is not a kind of an affrication. sent20: if the walk-on is a kind of a Thraupidae then it is electrostatics. sent21: if that the Girondist does bullshit and is a colorist hold it is not a bandicoot. sent22: something is a thermal if it is an affrication. sent23: the vol-au-vent does defibrillate worry. sent24: the teliospore is futuristic. sent25: the fact that the walk-on is not an affrication hold. sent26: if the vol-au-vent is electrostatics the Girondist is a Thraupidae. sent27: that the walk-on is precocious and it is a thermal is false.
sent8 & sent25 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the walk-on is not precocious and is a kind of a thermal hold does not hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the wing-nut is not electrostatics.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the vol-au-vent does defibrillate worry and is electrostatics.; int3 -> int4: the vol-au-vent is electrostatics.; int4 & sent26 -> int5: the Girondist is a Thraupidae.; sent1 -> int6: the Girondist does bullshit if it is a kind of a Thraupidae.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Girondist does bullshit.; sent7 & sent24 -> int8: the Girondist is a colorist.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Girondist does bullshit and it is a colorist.; int9 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the Girondist is a bandicoot.
sent12 -> int10: that the walk-on is an affrication but it is not electrostatics does not hold if it is not a Thraupidae.; sent4 -> int11: if the walk-on is not a bullshit and defibrillates worry it is not a Thraupidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the Girondist is a bandicoot. ; $context$ = sent1: something bullshits if it is a Thraupidae. sent2: something that is futuristic defibrillates worry. sent3: if the Girondist is thermal the walk-on does bullshit. sent4: if something is not a bullshit and defibrillates worry it is not a Thraupidae. sent5: if the wing-nut is not electrostatics the vol-au-vent defibrillates worry. sent6: that the vol-au-vent is a kind of a Thraupidae is not wrong. sent7: the Girondist is a colorist if the teliospore is futuristic. sent8: if the walk-on is not an affrication that the fact that it is both non-precocious and not nonthermal is right is wrong. sent9: the wing-nut is not electrostatics if the walk-on is precocious. sent10: the Girondist is not a crotch. sent11: the fact that the teliospore is not electrostatics but it is futuristic does not hold. sent12: if something is not a Thraupidae that it is an affrication and it is not electrostatics is not right. sent13: if that the walk-on is not precocious but it is a kind of a thermal is false the wing-nut is not electrostatics. sent14: the Girondist is precocious. sent15: the walk-on is not a bullshit but it does defibrillate worry if it is not a colorist. sent16: the wing-nut is not a kind of a thermal. sent17: the vol-au-vent defibrillates worry and is electrostatics if the wing-nut is not electrostatics. sent18: if something is not a Godunov the fact that it is not a lapin and is futuristic is wrong. sent19: that the walk-on is a kind of precocious thing that is a thermal is incorrect if it is not a kind of an affrication. sent20: if the walk-on is a kind of a Thraupidae then it is electrostatics. sent21: if that the Girondist does bullshit and is a colorist hold it is not a bandicoot. sent22: something is a thermal if it is an affrication. sent23: the vol-au-vent does defibrillate worry. sent24: the teliospore is futuristic. sent25: the fact that the walk-on is not an affrication hold. sent26: if the vol-au-vent is electrostatics the Girondist is a Thraupidae. sent27: that the walk-on is precocious and it is a thermal is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent25 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the walk-on is not precocious and is a kind of a thermal hold does not hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the wing-nut is not electrostatics.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the vol-au-vent does defibrillate worry and is electrostatics.; int3 -> int4: the vol-au-vent is electrostatics.; int4 & sent26 -> int5: the Girondist is a Thraupidae.; sent1 -> int6: the Girondist does bullshit if it is a kind of a Thraupidae.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Girondist does bullshit.; sent7 & sent24 -> int8: the Girondist is a colorist.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Girondist does bullshit and it is a colorist.; int9 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__