the tolling does not occur.
sent1: the downturn does not occur if the malting kerosene occurs and/or the riblessness occurs. sent2: if the topping Energy does not occur then both the topping blackcap and the grubbing hellbender happens. sent3: the downturn occurs. sent4: the riblessness does not occur if the lineation but not the downturn occurs. sent5: that the malting oration does not occur is not wrong if the flagellating CPU occurs. sent6: that the malting oration does not occur is right if that the quartering occurs is correct. sent7: the topping blackcap does not occur if not the malting kerosene but the lineation occurs. sent8: either the flagellating CPU happens or the quartering happens or both. sent9: that both the topping Energy and the lineation happens is triggered by that the malting oration does not occur. sent10: that the toll occurs is caused by that the topping blackcap does not occur and/or the grubbing hellbender does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malting kerosene happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the malting kerosene or the riblessness or both happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the downturn does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the malting kerosene does not occur.; sent8 & sent5 & sent6 -> int5: the malting oration does not occur.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the topping Energy happens and the lineation happens.; int6 -> int7: the lineation occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the malting kerosene does not occur but the lineation occurs.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the topping blackcap does not occur.; int9 -> int10: the topping blackcap does not occur and/or the grubbing hellbender does not occur.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the tolling does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the tolling does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the downturn does not occur if the malting kerosene occurs and/or the riblessness occurs. sent2: if the topping Energy does not occur then both the topping blackcap and the grubbing hellbender happens. sent3: the downturn occurs. sent4: the riblessness does not occur if the lineation but not the downturn occurs. sent5: that the malting oration does not occur is not wrong if the flagellating CPU occurs. sent6: that the malting oration does not occur is right if that the quartering occurs is correct. sent7: the topping blackcap does not occur if not the malting kerosene but the lineation occurs. sent8: either the flagellating CPU happens or the quartering happens or both. sent9: that both the topping Energy and the lineation happens is triggered by that the malting oration does not occur. sent10: that the toll occurs is caused by that the topping blackcap does not occur and/or the grubbing hellbender does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malting kerosene happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the malting kerosene or the riblessness or both happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the downturn does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the malting kerosene does not occur.; sent8 & sent5 & sent6 -> int5: the malting oration does not occur.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the topping Energy happens and the lineation happens.; int6 -> int7: the lineation occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the malting kerosene does not occur but the lineation occurs.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the topping blackcap does not occur.; int9 -> int10: the topping blackcap does not occur and/or the grubbing hellbender does not occur.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__