that the annexing does not occur triggers that both the exodonticness and the braggadocio occurs.
sent1: the italic occurs. sent2: if the intriguing whydah does not occur then the scaling anticipator does not occur. sent3: if that both the intriguing whydah and the serigraphy occurs does not hold the scaling anticipator does not occur. sent4: the fact that the interpellation occurs and the dispelling happens is not correct. sent5: the exodonticness does not occur if that either the carpeting promycelium does not occur or the low-techness happens or both does not hold. sent6: not the intriguing sorb but the scaling plat happens. sent7: the baiting does not occur if the lapping Habakkuk does not occur. sent8: if the annexing does not occur the fact that the intriguing whydah happens and the serigraphy happens is false. sent9: the carpeting promycelium does not occur if not the absorbing but the scrum occurs. sent10: the absorbing does not occur but the scrum happens. sent11: the annexing does not occur and the preventiveness does not occur if the scaling anticipator occurs. sent12: the fact that the intriguing whydah happens and the serigraphy happens does not hold if the annexing happens. sent13: that both the absorbing and the scrum happens triggers that the carpeting promycelium does not occur. sent14: if the carpeting promycelium does not occur then the low-techness happens. sent15: if the lapping credulity does not occur then the word happens and the crinoidness happens. sent16: if that the scaling anticipator does not occur is not false then the braggadocio occurs. sent17: that the substitution occurs and the hemodynamicsness happens does not hold if the gift does not occur. sent18: both the exodonticness and the braggadocio occurs if the annex happens. sent19: the absorbing does not occur. sent20: the low-techness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the annexing does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the intriguing whydah and the serigraphy happens is not true.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the scaling anticipator does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the braggadocio occurs.; sent9 & sent10 -> int4: the carpeting promycelium does not occur.;
the preventiveness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the annexing does not occur triggers that both the exodonticness and the braggadocio occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the italic occurs. sent2: if the intriguing whydah does not occur then the scaling anticipator does not occur. sent3: if that both the intriguing whydah and the serigraphy occurs does not hold the scaling anticipator does not occur. sent4: the fact that the interpellation occurs and the dispelling happens is not correct. sent5: the exodonticness does not occur if that either the carpeting promycelium does not occur or the low-techness happens or both does not hold. sent6: not the intriguing sorb but the scaling plat happens. sent7: the baiting does not occur if the lapping Habakkuk does not occur. sent8: if the annexing does not occur the fact that the intriguing whydah happens and the serigraphy happens is false. sent9: the carpeting promycelium does not occur if not the absorbing but the scrum occurs. sent10: the absorbing does not occur but the scrum happens. sent11: the annexing does not occur and the preventiveness does not occur if the scaling anticipator occurs. sent12: the fact that the intriguing whydah happens and the serigraphy happens does not hold if the annexing happens. sent13: that both the absorbing and the scrum happens triggers that the carpeting promycelium does not occur. sent14: if the carpeting promycelium does not occur then the low-techness happens. sent15: if the lapping credulity does not occur then the word happens and the crinoidness happens. sent16: if that the scaling anticipator does not occur is not false then the braggadocio occurs. sent17: that the substitution occurs and the hemodynamicsness happens does not hold if the gift does not occur. sent18: both the exodonticness and the braggadocio occurs if the annex happens. sent19: the absorbing does not occur. sent20: the low-techness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the annexing does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the intriguing whydah and the serigraphy happens is not true.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the scaling anticipator does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the braggadocio occurs.; sent9 & sent10 -> int4: the carpeting promycelium does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__