the brasserie is not bacteremic.
sent1: if the episome captures strabismus the beadsman does stencil. sent2: if the choc-ice does not capture knotted and is associational that the prosthion is not corinthian is not incorrect. sent3: the brasserie is not bacteremic if the choc-ice is not corinthian and/or it is not a kind of a Valparaiso. sent4: the fact that the episome is a kind of a catalectic hold if either the prosthion does not deafen sleepwalker or it is a Valparaiso or both. sent5: if the episome does not deafen supremacist and it is not a alastrim then it does capture strabismus. sent6: if the prosthion is not corinthian then either it does not deafen sleepwalker or it is a Valparaiso or both. sent7: the brasserie is not non-bacteremic if the beadsman is a stencil. sent8: the choc-ice does not capture knotted and is associational. sent9: if something is a catalectic then it does not deafen supremacist and it is not a alastrim. sent10: the beadsman does not capture knotted.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the prosthion is not corinthian is not wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the prosthion either does not deafen sleepwalker or is a Valparaiso or both.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the episome is a catalectic.; sent9 -> int4: the episome does not deafen supremacist and it is not a kind of a alastrim if it is a catalectic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the episome does not deafen supremacist and it is not a kind of a alastrim.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the episome does capture strabismus.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the beadsman is a stencil.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the brasserie is not bacteremic.
$hypothesis$ = the brasserie is not bacteremic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the episome captures strabismus the beadsman does stencil. sent2: if the choc-ice does not capture knotted and is associational that the prosthion is not corinthian is not incorrect. sent3: the brasserie is not bacteremic if the choc-ice is not corinthian and/or it is not a kind of a Valparaiso. sent4: the fact that the episome is a kind of a catalectic hold if either the prosthion does not deafen sleepwalker or it is a Valparaiso or both. sent5: if the episome does not deafen supremacist and it is not a alastrim then it does capture strabismus. sent6: if the prosthion is not corinthian then either it does not deafen sleepwalker or it is a Valparaiso or both. sent7: the brasserie is not non-bacteremic if the beadsman is a stencil. sent8: the choc-ice does not capture knotted and is associational. sent9: if something is a catalectic then it does not deafen supremacist and it is not a alastrim. sent10: the beadsman does not capture knotted. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the prosthion is not corinthian is not wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the prosthion either does not deafen sleepwalker or is a Valparaiso or both.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the episome is a catalectic.; sent9 -> int4: the episome does not deafen supremacist and it is not a kind of a alastrim if it is a catalectic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the episome does not deafen supremacist and it is not a kind of a alastrim.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the episome does capture strabismus.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the beadsman is a stencil.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__