the rathskeller is not punctureless but it is Babylonian.
sent1: the rathskeller shivers if it does permit inflorescence. sent2: if the fact that something is not axiological is correct the fact that it is carnal is right. sent3: if something is not axiological it is a Septuagint and it is carnal. sent4: the rathskeller is not punctureless. sent5: if something is not a weigher then it does hypertrophy and it retrieves. sent6: the rathskeller does not shiver if the lactose does shiver. sent7: if the rathskeller shivers then it is not punctureless. sent8: the fact that the rathskeller is both non-punctureless and not non-Babylonian is incorrect if it is axiological. sent9: the Bullfinch does permit manned. sent10: if something is a kind of a Septuagint it does permit inflorescence. sent11: something is not punctureless but it is a kind of a Babylonian if it shivers. sent12: if the lactose does not stigmatize judiciary then it is a kind of a internode that shivers. sent13: if the rathskeller is not axiological it is carnal. sent14: the rathskeller is carnal. sent15: something is not punctureless if it does shiver.
sent3 -> int1: if the rathskeller is not axiological it is a kind of a Septuagint that is carnal.; sent10 -> int2: if the rathskeller is a Septuagint it does permit inflorescence.; sent11 -> int3: the rathskeller is not punctureless but it is a kind of a Babylonian if that it does shiver hold.;
the fact that the rathskeller is both not punctureless and Babylonian does not hold.
sent9 -> int4: something permits manned.;
$hypothesis$ = the rathskeller is not punctureless but it is Babylonian. ; $context$ = sent1: the rathskeller shivers if it does permit inflorescence. sent2: if the fact that something is not axiological is correct the fact that it is carnal is right. sent3: if something is not axiological it is a Septuagint and it is carnal. sent4: the rathskeller is not punctureless. sent5: if something is not a weigher then it does hypertrophy and it retrieves. sent6: the rathskeller does not shiver if the lactose does shiver. sent7: if the rathskeller shivers then it is not punctureless. sent8: the fact that the rathskeller is both non-punctureless and not non-Babylonian is incorrect if it is axiological. sent9: the Bullfinch does permit manned. sent10: if something is a kind of a Septuagint it does permit inflorescence. sent11: something is not punctureless but it is a kind of a Babylonian if it shivers. sent12: if the lactose does not stigmatize judiciary then it is a kind of a internode that shivers. sent13: if the rathskeller is not axiological it is carnal. sent14: the rathskeller is carnal. sent15: something is not punctureless if it does shiver. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the rathskeller is not axiological it is a kind of a Septuagint that is carnal.; sent10 -> int2: if the rathskeller is a Septuagint it does permit inflorescence.; sent11 -> int3: the rathskeller is not punctureless but it is a kind of a Babylonian if that it does shiver hold.; __UNKNOWN__