the clearing Inconel does not occur.
sent1: the disproof occurs if that the condescending occurs but the signing femur does not occur is incorrect. sent2: that the clearing substitute does not occur but the headstand occurs brings about the clearing Inconel. sent3: the edutainment occurs if the fact that the clearing substitute happens is correct. sent4: that both the edutainment and the disproof occurs leads to that the clearing Inconel does not occur. sent5: the fact that either the headstand occurs or the clearing substitute does not occur or both is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the clearing substitute does not occur is correct.; assump1 -> int1: either the headstand occurs or the clearing substitute does not occur or both.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the clearing substitute happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the edutainment occurs.;
that the clearing Inconel happens hold.
$hypothesis$ = the clearing Inconel does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the disproof occurs if that the condescending occurs but the signing femur does not occur is incorrect. sent2: that the clearing substitute does not occur but the headstand occurs brings about the clearing Inconel. sent3: the edutainment occurs if the fact that the clearing substitute happens is correct. sent4: that both the edutainment and the disproof occurs leads to that the clearing Inconel does not occur. sent5: the fact that either the headstand occurs or the clearing substitute does not occur or both is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the clearing substitute does not occur is correct.; assump1 -> int1: either the headstand occurs or the clearing substitute does not occur or both.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the clearing substitute happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the edutainment occurs.; __UNKNOWN__