the jerry-builder does not snick armamentarium.
sent1: the Black is bimillenial if the fact that the horsetail is not influential and does snick clianthus is not true. sent2: that the Black does snick clianthus and is bimillenial is wrong. sent3: if the Black does snick clianthus then the jerry-builder does snick armamentarium. sent4: the Britisher does not snick clianthus if the horsetail is not categorial. sent5: something is non-bimillenial if the fact that it is non-bimillenial and it does not focus is not right. sent6: the fact that the horsetail is categorial and is influential is not right. sent7: if that the fact that the horsetail snicks clianthus and it is categorial is wrong hold the Britisher is not influential. sent8: if the fact that the Black does snick clianthus and is influential is wrong the horsetail is not bimillenial. sent9: if that the Black is not a numbers is not false that the Britisher is a kind of bimillenial thing that is not a focus does not hold. sent10: that the jerry-builder does snick armamentarium and is categorial is incorrect. sent11: that the Black does snick clianthus and it is bimillenial is incorrect if the Britisher does not snick clianthus. sent12: the lanai snicks clianthus. sent13: if the nucleoplasm is a plural it is not a extrasystole and is not a kind of a coif. sent14: that the jerry-builder does snick armamentarium hold if that the Black does not snick clianthus and is bimillenial is not correct. sent15: the fact that something does not snick clianthus and is not a numbers is right if it is not a focus. sent16: the Britisher does not snick clianthus if the fact that the horsetail is categorial and it is influential does not hold. sent17: if the horsetail does not snick clianthus and/or does not snick armamentarium the jerry-builder does not snick armamentarium. sent18: that if that the Black is non-bimillenial thing that is influential is not correct then the horsetail does snick clianthus is not incorrect. sent19: the jerry-builder is bimillenial if the fact that the horsetail does not snick armamentarium but it is influential is incorrect. sent20: that the Britisher is categorial and it snicks clianthus is wrong. sent21: the Black is not categorial. sent22: if that the Britisher does not snick clianthus is correct then that the fact that the Black does not snick clianthus and is bimillenial hold is not true. sent23: the fact that the Jacksonian proliferates Helenium and it is amnestic does not hold.
sent16 & sent6 -> int1: the Britisher does not snick clianthus.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the fact that the Black does not snick clianthus and is bimillenial is wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the jerry-builder does not snick armamentarium.
sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the fact that the Britisher is bimillenial and not a focus is right is not right it is not bimillenial.;
$hypothesis$ = the jerry-builder does not snick armamentarium. ; $context$ = sent1: the Black is bimillenial if the fact that the horsetail is not influential and does snick clianthus is not true. sent2: that the Black does snick clianthus and is bimillenial is wrong. sent3: if the Black does snick clianthus then the jerry-builder does snick armamentarium. sent4: the Britisher does not snick clianthus if the horsetail is not categorial. sent5: something is non-bimillenial if the fact that it is non-bimillenial and it does not focus is not right. sent6: the fact that the horsetail is categorial and is influential is not right. sent7: if that the fact that the horsetail snicks clianthus and it is categorial is wrong hold the Britisher is not influential. sent8: if the fact that the Black does snick clianthus and is influential is wrong the horsetail is not bimillenial. sent9: if that the Black is not a numbers is not false that the Britisher is a kind of bimillenial thing that is not a focus does not hold. sent10: that the jerry-builder does snick armamentarium and is categorial is incorrect. sent11: that the Black does snick clianthus and it is bimillenial is incorrect if the Britisher does not snick clianthus. sent12: the lanai snicks clianthus. sent13: if the nucleoplasm is a plural it is not a extrasystole and is not a kind of a coif. sent14: that the jerry-builder does snick armamentarium hold if that the Black does not snick clianthus and is bimillenial is not correct. sent15: the fact that something does not snick clianthus and is not a numbers is right if it is not a focus. sent16: the Britisher does not snick clianthus if the fact that the horsetail is categorial and it is influential does not hold. sent17: if the horsetail does not snick clianthus and/or does not snick armamentarium the jerry-builder does not snick armamentarium. sent18: that if that the Black is non-bimillenial thing that is influential is not correct then the horsetail does snick clianthus is not incorrect. sent19: the jerry-builder is bimillenial if the fact that the horsetail does not snick armamentarium but it is influential is incorrect. sent20: that the Britisher is categorial and it snicks clianthus is wrong. sent21: the Black is not categorial. sent22: if that the Britisher does not snick clianthus is correct then that the fact that the Black does not snick clianthus and is bimillenial hold is not true. sent23: the fact that the Jacksonian proliferates Helenium and it is amnestic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent6 -> int1: the Britisher does not snick clianthus.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the fact that the Black does not snick clianthus and is bimillenial is wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__