the thrombosing Robeson occurs if the fact that the scalableness does not occur is not right.
sent1: if the fact that the scorcher happens is not wrong then the immunization does not occur. sent2: the perforation prevents the Monacanness. sent3: if the combinativeness does not occur then the fact that that the weaning Kentish but not the masking occurs is right is not right. sent4: the fact that the fact that the propping liftman occurs and the remit happens is false is not wrong if the ohmicness does not occur. sent5: the spectating Pediculidae happens. sent6: that the weaning self-improvement but not the weaning fucker occurs does not hold if the resistibleness does not occur. sent7: the dimmedness happens if that the starriness happens but the sonography does not occur is false. sent8: that the weaning self-improvement does not occur brings about that the scalableness does not occur. sent9: if that the weaning self-improvement but not the weaning fucker happens is wrong the scalableness does not occur. sent10: if the indexation does not occur then that the weaning Kentish and the buyout happens is incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scalableness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the resistibleness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the weaning self-improvement but not the weaning fucker occurs is not right.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the scalableness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the resistibleness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the thrombosing Robeson occurs if the fact that the scalableness does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the scorcher happens is not wrong then the immunization does not occur. sent2: the perforation prevents the Monacanness. sent3: if the combinativeness does not occur then the fact that that the weaning Kentish but not the masking occurs is right is not right. sent4: the fact that the fact that the propping liftman occurs and the remit happens is false is not wrong if the ohmicness does not occur. sent5: the spectating Pediculidae happens. sent6: that the weaning self-improvement but not the weaning fucker occurs does not hold if the resistibleness does not occur. sent7: the dimmedness happens if that the starriness happens but the sonography does not occur is false. sent8: that the weaning self-improvement does not occur brings about that the scalableness does not occur. sent9: if that the weaning self-improvement but not the weaning fucker happens is wrong the scalableness does not occur. sent10: if the indexation does not occur then that the weaning Kentish and the buyout happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scalableness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the resistibleness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the weaning self-improvement but not the weaning fucker occurs is not right.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the scalableness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the resistibleness happens.; __UNKNOWN__