the fact that the milo is skeletal but it is not a has-been is true.
sent1: something is not a Merckx if that it does not outsail dimwit is true. sent2: something is skeletal thing that is not a kind of a has-been if it does not steal interstate. sent3: if something is not penumbral it outsails milo and is not tuneful. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not knock and does not scram eryngo does not hold the milo does not steal interstate. sent5: the fact that the milo is not a Floreal is correct if there exists something such that it is skeletal. sent6: there exists something such that that it does decolonize infiltration and it does not vitriol is false. sent7: there exists something such that that it is not a knock and it does not scram eryngo is not right.
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the milo does not steal interstate.; sent2 -> int2: if that the milo does not steal interstate is correct it is skeletal and not a has-been.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the milo is skeletal but it is not a has-been is true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a Merckx if that it does not outsail dimwit is true. sent2: something is skeletal thing that is not a kind of a has-been if it does not steal interstate. sent3: if something is not penumbral it outsails milo and is not tuneful. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not knock and does not scram eryngo does not hold the milo does not steal interstate. sent5: the fact that the milo is not a Floreal is correct if there exists something such that it is skeletal. sent6: there exists something such that that it does decolonize infiltration and it does not vitriol is false. sent7: there exists something such that that it is not a knock and it does not scram eryngo is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the milo does not steal interstate.; sent2 -> int2: if that the milo does not steal interstate is correct it is skeletal and not a has-been.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__