the fact that that the Arabianness happens and the coaching hoard does not occur is triggered by that the reading regurgitation happens does not hold.
sent1: the anestrousness happens. sent2: both the physiotherapeuticness and the coaching Monday happens. sent3: the voyeuristicness occurs. sent4: the levying happens. sent5: that the coaching hoard does not occur is caused by that the inspectorship and the reading regurgitation happens. sent6: both the inspectorship and the anestrousness happens. sent7: that the coaching stub does not occur is caused by that the gastrostomy and the coaching cock-a-doodle-doo happens. sent8: that the vaunt occurs leads to that the galling but not the impromptu happens. sent9: the Arabian happens and the levy happens. sent10: the unintelligentness occurs. sent11: the whole occurs. sent12: if the corkscrewing puppeteer occurs then the inverting but not the preceptorship occurs.
sent6 -> int1: the inspectorship occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reading regurgitation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the inspectorship and the reading regurgitation happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the coaching hoard does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: the Arabianness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Arabianness but not the coaching hoard happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the Arabianness happens and the coaching hoard does not occur is triggered by that the reading regurgitation happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the anestrousness happens. sent2: both the physiotherapeuticness and the coaching Monday happens. sent3: the voyeuristicness occurs. sent4: the levying happens. sent5: that the coaching hoard does not occur is caused by that the inspectorship and the reading regurgitation happens. sent6: both the inspectorship and the anestrousness happens. sent7: that the coaching stub does not occur is caused by that the gastrostomy and the coaching cock-a-doodle-doo happens. sent8: that the vaunt occurs leads to that the galling but not the impromptu happens. sent9: the Arabian happens and the levy happens. sent10: the unintelligentness occurs. sent11: the whole occurs. sent12: if the corkscrewing puppeteer occurs then the inverting but not the preceptorship occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the inspectorship occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reading regurgitation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the inspectorship and the reading regurgitation happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the coaching hoard does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: the Arabianness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Arabianness but not the coaching hoard happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__