that that something is stenographic and it is a Fourier hold is not right.
sent1: there is something such that it is not a Cumberland. sent2: there is something such that that it is a Fourier hold. sent3: something is a kind of a Cumberland. sent4: the Angevin is a Fourier. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is stenographic is not incorrect. sent6: something that is not non-Eucharistic is stenographic. sent7: the Angevin is Eucharistic if the fact that the brass is a kind of a rut hold. sent8: the brass is a kind of a rut that is a Zola if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Cumberland is not incorrect. sent9: the brass is a Zola. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Cumberland then the brass is a Zola.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the brass is a kind of a rut that is a Zola.; int1 -> int2: the brass is a rut.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Angevin is Eucharistic.; sent6 -> int4: the fact that if the Angevin is Eucharistic then the Angevin is stenographic is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Angevin is stenographic.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the Angevin is both not non-stenographic and a Fourier.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that something is stenographic and it is a Fourier hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not a Cumberland. sent2: there is something such that that it is a Fourier hold. sent3: something is a kind of a Cumberland. sent4: the Angevin is a Fourier. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is stenographic is not incorrect. sent6: something that is not non-Eucharistic is stenographic. sent7: the Angevin is Eucharistic if the fact that the brass is a kind of a rut hold. sent8: the brass is a kind of a rut that is a Zola if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Cumberland is not incorrect. sent9: the brass is a Zola. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Cumberland then the brass is a Zola. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the brass is a kind of a rut that is a Zola.; int1 -> int2: the brass is a rut.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Angevin is Eucharistic.; sent6 -> int4: the fact that if the Angevin is Eucharistic then the Angevin is stenographic is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Angevin is stenographic.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the Angevin is both not non-stenographic and a Fourier.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__