that the brocket does impact Danube and is a Monophysitism is not correct.
sent1: the cinnamon shivers Eiffel and is a Girondist. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the endocardium does not impact insulin and does impact lomustine is wrong hold the fact that the hallway is congregational is true. sent3: the fact that the endocardium does not impact insulin but it impacts lomustine does not hold if the eparch does not impact insulin. sent4: the brocket impacts Danube if that the fir shivers stamper but it is not aeromechanics is false. sent5: something does not houseclean or is not a urate or both. sent6: the fact that the fir does shiver stamper but it is not aeromechanics is wrong if the hallway is congregational. sent7: the cinnamon is a subcontract if there exists something such that it does not houseclean or it is not a kind of a urate or both. sent8: the brocket is a Monophysitism that is ecdemic. sent9: the eparch does not impact insulin if the cinnamon subcontracts and it is a Girondist. sent10: the cinnamon does shiver Eiffel.
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the cinnamon is a kind of a subcontract.; sent1 -> int2: the cinnamon is a Girondist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cinnamon is both a subcontract and a Girondist.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the eparch does not impact insulin.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the endocardium does not impact insulin but it impacts lomustine is false.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the hallway is congregational.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the fir shivers stamper and is not aeromechanics is not right.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the brocket does impact Danube.; sent8 -> int9: the brocket is a Monophysitism.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the brocket does impact Danube and is a Monophysitism is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the cinnamon shivers Eiffel and is a Girondist. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the endocardium does not impact insulin and does impact lomustine is wrong hold the fact that the hallway is congregational is true. sent3: the fact that the endocardium does not impact insulin but it impacts lomustine does not hold if the eparch does not impact insulin. sent4: the brocket impacts Danube if that the fir shivers stamper but it is not aeromechanics is false. sent5: something does not houseclean or is not a urate or both. sent6: the fact that the fir does shiver stamper but it is not aeromechanics is wrong if the hallway is congregational. sent7: the cinnamon is a subcontract if there exists something such that it does not houseclean or it is not a kind of a urate or both. sent8: the brocket is a Monophysitism that is ecdemic. sent9: the eparch does not impact insulin if the cinnamon subcontracts and it is a Girondist. sent10: the cinnamon does shiver Eiffel. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the cinnamon is a kind of a subcontract.; sent1 -> int2: the cinnamon is a Girondist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cinnamon is both a subcontract and a Girondist.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the eparch does not impact insulin.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the endocardium does not impact insulin but it impacts lomustine is false.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the hallway is congregational.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the fir shivers stamper and is not aeromechanics is not right.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the brocket does impact Danube.; sent8 -> int9: the brocket is a Monophysitism.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__