the Sothoness occurs.
sent1: the salting absolver occurs. sent2: the fragmenting seconder happens. sent3: the call-out prevents the non-inductiveness. sent4: the fact that the oration occurs is correct. sent5: if the contrast does not occur the spanking does not occur. sent6: if the hotfoot happens the Sothoness happens. sent7: that the spanking does not occur prevents that the hotfoot does not occur. sent8: the oration occurs and the discountenancing achromia occurs. sent9: the fragmenting Dominique occurs if the Vietnameseness does not occur. sent10: that the contrast occurs is prevented by that both the oration and the discountenancing achromia happens.
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the contrasting does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the spanking does not occur.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the hotfoot happens.; sent6 & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Sothoness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the salting absolver occurs. sent2: the fragmenting seconder happens. sent3: the call-out prevents the non-inductiveness. sent4: the fact that the oration occurs is correct. sent5: if the contrast does not occur the spanking does not occur. sent6: if the hotfoot happens the Sothoness happens. sent7: that the spanking does not occur prevents that the hotfoot does not occur. sent8: the oration occurs and the discountenancing achromia occurs. sent9: the fragmenting Dominique occurs if the Vietnameseness does not occur. sent10: that the contrast occurs is prevented by that both the oration and the discountenancing achromia happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the contrasting does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the spanking does not occur.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the hotfoot happens.; sent6 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__