there exists something such that if that the fact that it is a kind of a femur and it is a Dragunov hold does not hold it is not a kind of a existentialist.
sent1: the officiant is not a existentialist if it is not a kind of a Dragunov. sent2: something does not braid if that it is a ortolan and it is backing is not correct. sent3: that the officiant is not existentialist is not incorrect if that it is a femur and it is a kind of a Dragunov is false. sent4: there exists something such that if that that it is a geneticism and it is a fumigant is not false does not hold then it is not a Tachypleus. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a femur and it is a kind of a Dragunov then it is not a kind of a existentialist. sent6: if the fact that the officiant is seasonable and hogs self-government does not hold then it is not a Westminster. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it hogs reuptake and it is a paparazzo is incorrect then it is not alkahestic. sent8: the officiant is not existentialist if it is a kind of a femur that is a kind of a Dragunov. sent9: if that the officiant is a existentialist and a wonder does not hold it is not a putoff. sent10: that there is something such that if that it is a kind of a Westminster and it does occur is incorrect then the fact that it is not a chemistry hold is not false. sent11: there is something such that if that that it is a kind of cordless thing that does repress monitoring hold is incorrect then it is not a rational. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a Dragunov it is not a existentialist. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is both a femur and a Dragunov is not right then that it is a kind of a existentialist is not wrong. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a mustache and it hogs Hera is wrong then it does not solve. sent15: the antibody is not iconic if that it is a kind of trabecular thing that is a femur is not true. sent16: there is something such that if that it is a Peirce and it tapers is not right it does not repress dotard. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a femur then it is not a existentialist. sent18: if the fact that the officiant is a femur and is a kind of a Dragunov is wrong then it is existentialist. sent19: the officiant is not a carrier if the fact that it is both an endorsement and seasonable is incorrect.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is a ortolan that is a backing is not true then it is not a braid is correct.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the cymbal is a ortolan and backing is wrong then it is not a braid.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that the fact that it is a kind of a femur and it is a Dragunov hold does not hold it is not a kind of a existentialist. ; $context$ = sent1: the officiant is not a existentialist if it is not a kind of a Dragunov. sent2: something does not braid if that it is a ortolan and it is backing is not correct. sent3: that the officiant is not existentialist is not incorrect if that it is a femur and it is a kind of a Dragunov is false. sent4: there exists something such that if that that it is a geneticism and it is a fumigant is not false does not hold then it is not a Tachypleus. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a femur and it is a kind of a Dragunov then it is not a kind of a existentialist. sent6: if the fact that the officiant is seasonable and hogs self-government does not hold then it is not a Westminster. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it hogs reuptake and it is a paparazzo is incorrect then it is not alkahestic. sent8: the officiant is not existentialist if it is a kind of a femur that is a kind of a Dragunov. sent9: if that the officiant is a existentialist and a wonder does not hold it is not a putoff. sent10: that there is something such that if that it is a kind of a Westminster and it does occur is incorrect then the fact that it is not a chemistry hold is not false. sent11: there is something such that if that that it is a kind of cordless thing that does repress monitoring hold is incorrect then it is not a rational. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a Dragunov it is not a existentialist. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is both a femur and a Dragunov is not right then that it is a kind of a existentialist is not wrong. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a mustache and it hogs Hera is wrong then it does not solve. sent15: the antibody is not iconic if that it is a kind of trabecular thing that is a femur is not true. sent16: there is something such that if that it is a Peirce and it tapers is not right it does not repress dotard. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a femur then it is not a existentialist. sent18: if the fact that the officiant is a femur and is a kind of a Dragunov is wrong then it is existentialist. sent19: the officiant is not a carrier if the fact that it is both an endorsement and seasonable is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__