the flashflood but not the censor occurs.
sent1: the veto happens. sent2: that the launching licensee but not the embezzlement happens does not hold if the fact that the isolation occurs is not wrong. sent3: the collaboration and the reasonableness occurs. sent4: that the one-step occurs and the bombshell occurs triggers that the flabbergasting softness does not occur. sent5: the launching licensee triggers the collecting dacite. sent6: the microcephalicness does not occur. sent7: if that the launching licensee occurs and the embezzlement does not occur is wrong then the collecting dacite does not occur. sent8: that the embezzlement does not occur results in that the collecting dacite occurs. sent9: the launching licensee occurs or the embezzlement does not occur or both. sent10: if the decampment does not occur the amphitheatricness happens. sent11: if the collecting dacite happens that the flabbergasting softness occurs is not incorrect. sent12: that the one-step does not occur triggers that the flashflood occurs but the censoring does not occur. sent13: if the bohemianism does not occur the launching cake occurs. sent14: that not the epiduralness but the flabbergasting omicron happens is wrong. sent15: the self-defense occurs and the one-step occurs if the bombshell does not occur. sent16: if the flashflood does not occur not the bombshell but the flabbergasting softness happens. sent17: the Odyssey occurs. sent18: the flashflood occurs. sent19: that the waiting occurs or the hide-and-seek or both is triggered by that the collecting Bellini does not occur. sent20: the collecting Bellini does not occur if that the epidural does not occur but the flabbergasting omicron occurs is not correct. sent21: the flashflood occurs if the one-stepping does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the one-stepping occurs.; sent9 & sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the collecting dacite occurs.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the flabbergasting softness happens.;
that the flashflood happens but the censoring does not occur does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the flashflood but not the censor occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the veto happens. sent2: that the launching licensee but not the embezzlement happens does not hold if the fact that the isolation occurs is not wrong. sent3: the collaboration and the reasonableness occurs. sent4: that the one-step occurs and the bombshell occurs triggers that the flabbergasting softness does not occur. sent5: the launching licensee triggers the collecting dacite. sent6: the microcephalicness does not occur. sent7: if that the launching licensee occurs and the embezzlement does not occur is wrong then the collecting dacite does not occur. sent8: that the embezzlement does not occur results in that the collecting dacite occurs. sent9: the launching licensee occurs or the embezzlement does not occur or both. sent10: if the decampment does not occur the amphitheatricness happens. sent11: if the collecting dacite happens that the flabbergasting softness occurs is not incorrect. sent12: that the one-step does not occur triggers that the flashflood occurs but the censoring does not occur. sent13: if the bohemianism does not occur the launching cake occurs. sent14: that not the epiduralness but the flabbergasting omicron happens is wrong. sent15: the self-defense occurs and the one-step occurs if the bombshell does not occur. sent16: if the flashflood does not occur not the bombshell but the flabbergasting softness happens. sent17: the Odyssey occurs. sent18: the flashflood occurs. sent19: that the waiting occurs or the hide-and-seek or both is triggered by that the collecting Bellini does not occur. sent20: the collecting Bellini does not occur if that the epidural does not occur but the flabbergasting omicron occurs is not correct. sent21: the flashflood occurs if the one-stepping does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the one-stepping occurs.; sent9 & sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the collecting dacite occurs.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the flabbergasting softness happens.; __UNKNOWN__