the lackey does not impair poxvirus.
sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a Pagophila but it does not impair poxvirus is false if it is a galantine. sent2: if the fact that something deplores chalcidfly and is a HIV is not true it does not deplores chalcidfly. sent3: that the chalcidfly does impair tastebud hold if there exists something such that it is not a prohibition. sent4: if something does impair poxvirus the lackey is a kind of a dimethylglyoxime and it is a HIV. sent5: the tastebud is not a prohibition. sent6: the poxvirus is bacteriostatic. sent7: the fact that the finback does not deplore chalcidfly is not wrong. sent8: a Pagophila does deplore chalcidfly. sent9: the fact that the lackey does deplore chalcidfly and it is a HIV is wrong if the poxvirus is not a dimethylglyoxime. sent10: the fact that the fact that the chalcidfly is a dimethylglyoxime and a prohibition is not right is true if there is something such that it does not impair tastebud. sent11: if something is a kind of a Pagophila then it is bacteriostatic. sent12: the tastebud is not a lastingness and it does not impair tastebud if it is not a gibbon. sent13: the fact that the chalcidfly is bacteriostatic hold if the poxvirus is a dimethylglyoxime. sent14: the poxvirus is bacteriostatic if there is something such that it is a galantine. sent15: there exists something such that it is a prohibition. sent16: the poxvirus does impair tastebud. sent17: the tastebud is not a gibbon. sent18: if the chalcidfly is a kind of a HIV and is a dimethylglyoxime then the lackey does not impair poxvirus. sent19: the chalcidfly is a kind of a HIV if the poxvirus does deplore chalcidfly. sent20: something is a dimethylglyoxime if it does impair tastebud. sent21: the poxvirus is a Pagophila and it is bacteriostatic if there exists something such that it is a galantine. sent22: if that something is a kind of a Pagophila and does not impair poxvirus is not true it impair poxvirus.
sent8 -> int1: the poxvirus deplores chalcidfly if it is a Pagophila.; sent20 -> int2: if the fact that the chalcidfly does impair tastebud hold it is a dimethylglyoxime.; sent5 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a prohibition.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the chalcidfly impairs tastebud.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the chalcidfly is a dimethylglyoxime.;
the lackey does impair poxvirus.
sent22 -> int6: if that the lackey is a Pagophila and does not impair poxvirus is incorrect then it impair poxvirus.; sent1 -> int7: the fact that the lackey is a kind of a Pagophila that does not impair poxvirus is not correct if it is a galantine.; sent2 -> int8: the lackey does not deplore chalcidfly if that it does deplore chalcidfly and is a HIV is not true.; sent12 & sent17 -> int9: the tastebud is not a kind of a lastingness and does not impair tastebud.; int9 -> int10: the tastebud does not impair tastebud.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it does not impair tastebud.; int11 & sent10 -> int12: that the chalcidfly is a dimethylglyoxime that is a prohibition does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is a dimethylglyoxime and is a kind of a prohibition does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the lackey does not impair poxvirus. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a Pagophila but it does not impair poxvirus is false if it is a galantine. sent2: if the fact that something deplores chalcidfly and is a HIV is not true it does not deplores chalcidfly. sent3: that the chalcidfly does impair tastebud hold if there exists something such that it is not a prohibition. sent4: if something does impair poxvirus the lackey is a kind of a dimethylglyoxime and it is a HIV. sent5: the tastebud is not a prohibition. sent6: the poxvirus is bacteriostatic. sent7: the fact that the finback does not deplore chalcidfly is not wrong. sent8: a Pagophila does deplore chalcidfly. sent9: the fact that the lackey does deplore chalcidfly and it is a HIV is wrong if the poxvirus is not a dimethylglyoxime. sent10: the fact that the fact that the chalcidfly is a dimethylglyoxime and a prohibition is not right is true if there is something such that it does not impair tastebud. sent11: if something is a kind of a Pagophila then it is bacteriostatic. sent12: the tastebud is not a lastingness and it does not impair tastebud if it is not a gibbon. sent13: the fact that the chalcidfly is bacteriostatic hold if the poxvirus is a dimethylglyoxime. sent14: the poxvirus is bacteriostatic if there is something such that it is a galantine. sent15: there exists something such that it is a prohibition. sent16: the poxvirus does impair tastebud. sent17: the tastebud is not a gibbon. sent18: if the chalcidfly is a kind of a HIV and is a dimethylglyoxime then the lackey does not impair poxvirus. sent19: the chalcidfly is a kind of a HIV if the poxvirus does deplore chalcidfly. sent20: something is a dimethylglyoxime if it does impair tastebud. sent21: the poxvirus is a Pagophila and it is bacteriostatic if there exists something such that it is a galantine. sent22: if that something is a kind of a Pagophila and does not impair poxvirus is not true it impair poxvirus. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the poxvirus deplores chalcidfly if it is a Pagophila.; sent20 -> int2: if the fact that the chalcidfly does impair tastebud hold it is a dimethylglyoxime.; sent5 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a prohibition.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the chalcidfly impairs tastebud.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the chalcidfly is a dimethylglyoxime.; __UNKNOWN__