the meltwater is not exothermic.
sent1: that something does not tamp martinet and it is not etiological is not false if it is not fibrocalcific. sent2: if the aperture is a Sphyrapicus the neutrino does destain. sent3: the sagebrush tamps martinet if something is antennal and it is exothermic. sent4: the discard is exothermic. sent5: the aperture is a miniver. sent6: there is something such that it is a miniver and is Peruvian. sent7: if the neutrino does destain the meltwater is antennal. sent8: something is a Sphyrapicus if that it is a Peruvian hold. sent9: that something is a miniver and not exothermic is not right if it is not a kind of a Peruvian. sent10: the sagebrush hews. sent11: the compositor is a kind of a miniver and it is a kind of a Peruvian if the aperture is not a Sphyrapicus. sent12: the aperture is a Peruvian and it is a miniver. sent13: that the fact that the sagebrush is not expiatory but it fears ootid is not wrong does not hold. sent14: something is expiatory if it is a Peruvian. sent15: there exists nothing such that it destains and is not a Sphyrapicus.
sent12 -> int1: the aperture is a Peruvian.; sent8 -> int2: the aperture is a Sphyrapicus if it is a Peruvian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the aperture is a Sphyrapicus.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the neutrino destains.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the meltwater is antennal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meltwater is not non-exothermic.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the meltwater is antennal and it is exothermic.; int6 -> int7: something is antennal and it is exothermic.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the sagebrush does tamp martinet.; sent1 -> int9: if the sagebrush is not fibrocalcific then it does not tamp martinet and it is not etiological.;
the compositor is expiatory.
sent14 -> int10: if the compositor is a Peruvian it is not non-expiatory.;
$hypothesis$ = the meltwater is not exothermic. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does not tamp martinet and it is not etiological is not false if it is not fibrocalcific. sent2: if the aperture is a Sphyrapicus the neutrino does destain. sent3: the sagebrush tamps martinet if something is antennal and it is exothermic. sent4: the discard is exothermic. sent5: the aperture is a miniver. sent6: there is something such that it is a miniver and is Peruvian. sent7: if the neutrino does destain the meltwater is antennal. sent8: something is a Sphyrapicus if that it is a Peruvian hold. sent9: that something is a miniver and not exothermic is not right if it is not a kind of a Peruvian. sent10: the sagebrush hews. sent11: the compositor is a kind of a miniver and it is a kind of a Peruvian if the aperture is not a Sphyrapicus. sent12: the aperture is a Peruvian and it is a miniver. sent13: that the fact that the sagebrush is not expiatory but it fears ootid is not wrong does not hold. sent14: something is expiatory if it is a Peruvian. sent15: there exists nothing such that it destains and is not a Sphyrapicus. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the aperture is a Peruvian.; sent8 -> int2: the aperture is a Sphyrapicus if it is a Peruvian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the aperture is a Sphyrapicus.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the neutrino destains.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the meltwater is antennal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meltwater is not non-exothermic.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the meltwater is antennal and it is exothermic.; int6 -> int7: something is antennal and it is exothermic.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the sagebrush does tamp martinet.; sent1 -> int9: if the sagebrush is not fibrocalcific then it does not tamp martinet and it is not etiological.; __UNKNOWN__