the dryer is not a dragonet and it does not overturn invalidism.
sent1: that if something is not a kind of a dragonet and does not overturn invalidism it does not overturn struggling is true. sent2: if something bags then that it does not overturn invalidism and is not percussive is incorrect. sent3: the dryer is not a dragonet. sent4: the fact that the dryer is a dragonet and does not overturn invalidism does not hold. sent5: everything is not Gilbertian. sent6: everything overturns struggling. sent7: the dryer does not overturn struggling if the fact that it is a dragonet and does not overturn invalidism hold. sent8: if something that is a kind of a dragonet does not overturn invalidism it does not overturn struggling. sent9: something is a motel and is a kind of a silvex if it is not Gilbertian. sent10: something is a bag if it does not overturn struggling.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the dryer does not overturn struggling is not incorrect if it is not a kind of a dragonet and does not overturn invalidism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dryer is not a dragonet and it does not overturn invalidism.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dryer does not overturn struggling.; sent6 -> int3: the dryer does overturn struggling.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the trip does not overturn invalidism and is not percussive does not hold.
sent9 -> int5: if the oocyte is not Gilbertian then it is a motel and is a silvex.; sent5 -> int6: the oocyte is not Gilbertian.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the oocyte is a motel that is a silvex.; sent10 -> int8: the oocyte bags if it does not overturn struggling.; sent2 -> int9: that the oocyte does not overturn invalidism and is not percussive is not correct if it bags.;
$hypothesis$ = the dryer is not a dragonet and it does not overturn invalidism. ; $context$ = sent1: that if something is not a kind of a dragonet and does not overturn invalidism it does not overturn struggling is true. sent2: if something bags then that it does not overturn invalidism and is not percussive is incorrect. sent3: the dryer is not a dragonet. sent4: the fact that the dryer is a dragonet and does not overturn invalidism does not hold. sent5: everything is not Gilbertian. sent6: everything overturns struggling. sent7: the dryer does not overturn struggling if the fact that it is a dragonet and does not overturn invalidism hold. sent8: if something that is a kind of a dragonet does not overturn invalidism it does not overturn struggling. sent9: something is a motel and is a kind of a silvex if it is not Gilbertian. sent10: something is a bag if it does not overturn struggling. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the dryer does not overturn struggling is not incorrect if it is not a kind of a dragonet and does not overturn invalidism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dryer is not a dragonet and it does not overturn invalidism.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dryer does not overturn struggling.; sent6 -> int3: the dryer does overturn struggling.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__