the nonexplosiveness happens and the kindling happens if the vrooming does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the extradition but not the supposing occurs hold. sent2: the reconvening happens if the Mills occurs. sent3: the kindling happens if the reconvening but not the vrooming occurs. sent4: if the fact that the Mills does not occur is right then the extradition does not occur. sent5: the fractionation occurs. sent6: if that the extradition occurs but the Mills does not occur is incorrect then the Kuroshio happens. sent7: the mystifying isogamy occurs. sent8: the interruption does not occur. sent9: the nonexplosiveness happens and the enjoying occurs if the fact that the interruption does not occur hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Mills does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the extradition does not occur.; sent1 -> int2: the extradition happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Mills occurs.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the reconvening occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vrooming does not occur.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the reconvening but not the vrooming happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the kindling occurs.; sent9 & sent8 -> int8: the nonexplosiveness happens and the enjoying occurs.; int8 -> int9: the nonexplosiveness happens.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the nonexplosiveness and the kindling happens.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the Kuroshio happens.
$hypothesis$ = the nonexplosiveness happens and the kindling happens if the vrooming does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the extradition but not the supposing occurs hold. sent2: the reconvening happens if the Mills occurs. sent3: the kindling happens if the reconvening but not the vrooming occurs. sent4: if the fact that the Mills does not occur is right then the extradition does not occur. sent5: the fractionation occurs. sent6: if that the extradition occurs but the Mills does not occur is incorrect then the Kuroshio happens. sent7: the mystifying isogamy occurs. sent8: the interruption does not occur. sent9: the nonexplosiveness happens and the enjoying occurs if the fact that the interruption does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Mills does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the extradition does not occur.; sent1 -> int2: the extradition happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Mills occurs.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the reconvening occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vrooming does not occur.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the reconvening but not the vrooming happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the kindling occurs.; sent9 & sent8 -> int8: the nonexplosiveness happens and the enjoying occurs.; int8 -> int9: the nonexplosiveness happens.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the nonexplosiveness and the kindling happens.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__