the glaciation pigments retro and is a ethchlorvynol.
sent1: the aunt does not pigment retro if either the wakeboard is not a cocoon or it is not alkaline or both. sent2: if the aunt is not alkaline it is both a ethchlorvynol and not ambiversive. sent3: the glaciation is cogitative. sent4: the glaciation is cogitative if it is not a kind of a cocoon. sent5: if something that is endoscopic is not ambiversive the glaciation is alkaline. sent6: the fountain does not ascertain ptyalin. sent7: if the fountain does not ascertain ptyalin the fact that it is bibliopolic and a Upanishad does not hold. sent8: if the glaciation is not endoscopic then it is cogitative and non-alkaline. sent9: there are cogitative things. sent10: the aunt is not alkaline. sent11: the glaciation is a kind of a ethchlorvynol. sent12: there exists something such that it is not endoscopic. sent13: that either something is not a cocoon or it is not alkaline or both is not incorrect if it is ambiversive. sent14: the glaciation is cogitative but it is not endoscopic if it is not a cocoon. sent15: the aunt is a kind of a Basseterre if it is diamantine. sent16: if the glaciation is not non-ambiversive it does pigment retro. sent17: the fact that if the aunt is alkaline then the aunt is social is not false. sent18: there exists something such that it is cogitative and endoscopic. sent19: if that the glaciation cocoons is not wrong it is ambiversive. sent20: a non-bibliopolic thing is ambiversive and a Schefflera. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is bibliopolic and a Upanishad does not hold that the wakeboard is not bibliopolic is true. sent22: if there exists something such that it is a cocoon and it is not endoscopic the glaciation does pigment retro.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glaciation is not a kind of a cocoon.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the glaciation is cogitative and is not endoscopic.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is cogitative but not endoscopic.;
that the glaciation pigments retro and is a ethchlorvynol is not right.
sent13 -> int3: the wakeboard is not a kind of a cocoon or is not alkaline or both if it is ambiversive.; sent20 -> int4: the wakeboard is ambiversive and it is a kind of a Schefflera if it is non-bibliopolic.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: that the fountain is bibliopolic and is a Upanishad is incorrect.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it is both bibliopolic and a Upanishad does not hold.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the wakeboard is not bibliopolic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the wakeboard is ambiversive and it is a kind of a Schefflera.; int8 -> int9: the wakeboard is ambiversive.; int3 & int9 -> int10: the wakeboard is not a cocoon and/or is non-alkaline.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the aunt does not pigment retro is correct.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it does not pigment retro.;
$hypothesis$ = the glaciation pigments retro and is a ethchlorvynol. ; $context$ = sent1: the aunt does not pigment retro if either the wakeboard is not a cocoon or it is not alkaline or both. sent2: if the aunt is not alkaline it is both a ethchlorvynol and not ambiversive. sent3: the glaciation is cogitative. sent4: the glaciation is cogitative if it is not a kind of a cocoon. sent5: if something that is endoscopic is not ambiversive the glaciation is alkaline. sent6: the fountain does not ascertain ptyalin. sent7: if the fountain does not ascertain ptyalin the fact that it is bibliopolic and a Upanishad does not hold. sent8: if the glaciation is not endoscopic then it is cogitative and non-alkaline. sent9: there are cogitative things. sent10: the aunt is not alkaline. sent11: the glaciation is a kind of a ethchlorvynol. sent12: there exists something such that it is not endoscopic. sent13: that either something is not a cocoon or it is not alkaline or both is not incorrect if it is ambiversive. sent14: the glaciation is cogitative but it is not endoscopic if it is not a cocoon. sent15: the aunt is a kind of a Basseterre if it is diamantine. sent16: if the glaciation is not non-ambiversive it does pigment retro. sent17: the fact that if the aunt is alkaline then the aunt is social is not false. sent18: there exists something such that it is cogitative and endoscopic. sent19: if that the glaciation cocoons is not wrong it is ambiversive. sent20: a non-bibliopolic thing is ambiversive and a Schefflera. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is bibliopolic and a Upanishad does not hold that the wakeboard is not bibliopolic is true. sent22: if there exists something such that it is a cocoon and it is not endoscopic the glaciation does pigment retro. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glaciation is not a kind of a cocoon.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the glaciation is cogitative and is not endoscopic.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is cogitative but not endoscopic.; __UNKNOWN__