if the troika surprises Arminius the fact that the platter blasphemes great-aunt but it is not a dazzle does not hold.
sent1: if the oilfish is asymmetrical the troika is a Cynic. sent2: if there is something such that it is seedless then the spermatophyte is a centering. sent3: if the spermatophyte surprises Arminius then that the troika is both a centering and not a Cynic is incorrect. sent4: if the spermatophyte is a kind of a centering then that the fact that the headlight is a kind of an athlete and does not match hold does not hold. sent5: the fact that the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and it is a kind of a dazzle is not right if the troika surprises Arminius. sent6: if the troika does not blaspheme great-aunt then that the juniper does blaspheme great-aunt but it does not surprise Arminius is false. sent7: the fact that the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt is right if the troika is a kind of a Cynic that surprises Arminius. sent8: the fact that the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and is not a kind of a dazzle is not true if the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt. sent9: the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and it is asymmetrical. sent10: something is not seedy. sent11: that the headlight is both an athlete and not asymmetrical is not true. sent12: the fact that the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and it dazzles is incorrect if the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt. sent13: the juniper is an athlete. sent14: the fact that the platter blasphemes great-aunt but it is not a kind of a Cynic is false if the troika is a kind of a match. sent15: the platter blasphemes great-aunt but it is not a kind of a dazzle. sent16: if the fact that the fact that the headlight is an athlete but it is not a match is not true hold that the oilfish is asymmetrical is not false. sent17: the spermatophyte blasphemes great-aunt. sent18: the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and is not a dazzle if the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt. sent19: that the platter blasphemes great-aunt and does dazzle is not correct. sent20: the oilfish is asymmetrical if the headlight is not an athlete. sent21: that the platter blasphemes great-aunt but it does not dazzle is not wrong if the troika does surprise Arminius.
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the spermatophyte is centering.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that the headlight is an athlete but it is not a kind of a match is not right.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the oilfish is asymmetrical.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the troika is a Cynic is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the troika does surprise Arminius.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the troika is a kind of a Cynic that surprises Arminius.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: that the fact that the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and is not a kind of a dazzle is not correct is not wrong.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the troika surprises Arminius the fact that the platter blasphemes great-aunt but it is not a dazzle does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the oilfish is asymmetrical the troika is a Cynic. sent2: if there is something such that it is seedless then the spermatophyte is a centering. sent3: if the spermatophyte surprises Arminius then that the troika is both a centering and not a Cynic is incorrect. sent4: if the spermatophyte is a kind of a centering then that the fact that the headlight is a kind of an athlete and does not match hold does not hold. sent5: the fact that the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and it is a kind of a dazzle is not right if the troika surprises Arminius. sent6: if the troika does not blaspheme great-aunt then that the juniper does blaspheme great-aunt but it does not surprise Arminius is false. sent7: the fact that the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt is right if the troika is a kind of a Cynic that surprises Arminius. sent8: the fact that the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and is not a kind of a dazzle is not true if the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt. sent9: the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and it is asymmetrical. sent10: something is not seedy. sent11: that the headlight is both an athlete and not asymmetrical is not true. sent12: the fact that the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and it dazzles is incorrect if the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt. sent13: the juniper is an athlete. sent14: the fact that the platter blasphemes great-aunt but it is not a kind of a Cynic is false if the troika is a kind of a match. sent15: the platter blasphemes great-aunt but it is not a kind of a dazzle. sent16: if the fact that the fact that the headlight is an athlete but it is not a match is not true hold that the oilfish is asymmetrical is not false. sent17: the spermatophyte blasphemes great-aunt. sent18: the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and is not a dazzle if the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt. sent19: that the platter blasphemes great-aunt and does dazzle is not correct. sent20: the oilfish is asymmetrical if the headlight is not an athlete. sent21: that the platter blasphemes great-aunt but it does not dazzle is not wrong if the troika does surprise Arminius. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the spermatophyte is centering.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that the headlight is an athlete but it is not a kind of a match is not right.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the oilfish is asymmetrical.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the troika is a Cynic is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the troika does surprise Arminius.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the troika is a kind of a Cynic that surprises Arminius.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the juniper does not blaspheme great-aunt.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: that the fact that the platter does blaspheme great-aunt and is not a kind of a dazzle is not correct is not wrong.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__