the fact that the tenderloin is a kind of exploratory a vicereine is incorrect.
sent1: if the tenderloin is a kind of an unfairness it does rationalize acetyl. sent2: the tenderloin is an unfairness. sent3: if the tenderloin rationalizes acetyl and is not a kind of an operative then the fact that it does macerate is true. sent4: that the tenderloin is a passer that is not attentional does not hold. sent5: the fact that everything is a kind of a vicereine and it is client-server is not incorrect. sent6: if something macerates then it is exploratory. sent7: if that the tenderloin is both a passer and not attentional is not right then that it is not an operative is not wrong. sent8: everything does neglect one-billionth.
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the tenderloin rationalizes acetyl is true.; sent7 & sent4 -> int2: the tenderloin is inoperative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tenderloin rationalizes acetyl and is not an operative.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the tenderloin macerates.; sent6 -> int5: the tenderloin is exploratory if it does macerate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the tenderloin is exploratory.; sent5 -> int7: the tenderloin is a vicereine that is client-server.; int7 -> int8: the tenderloin is a vicereine.; int6 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tenderloin is a kind of exploratory a vicereine is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tenderloin is a kind of an unfairness it does rationalize acetyl. sent2: the tenderloin is an unfairness. sent3: if the tenderloin rationalizes acetyl and is not a kind of an operative then the fact that it does macerate is true. sent4: that the tenderloin is a passer that is not attentional does not hold. sent5: the fact that everything is a kind of a vicereine and it is client-server is not incorrect. sent6: if something macerates then it is exploratory. sent7: if that the tenderloin is both a passer and not attentional is not right then that it is not an operative is not wrong. sent8: everything does neglect one-billionth. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the tenderloin rationalizes acetyl is true.; sent7 & sent4 -> int2: the tenderloin is inoperative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tenderloin rationalizes acetyl and is not an operative.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the tenderloin macerates.; sent6 -> int5: the tenderloin is exploratory if it does macerate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the tenderloin is exploratory.; sent5 -> int7: the tenderloin is a vicereine that is client-server.; int7 -> int8: the tenderloin is a vicereine.; int6 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__