the stereoscopicness happens.
sent1: that both the spat and the unsoldness happens triggers the non-neurophysiologicalness. sent2: the stereoscopicness happens if the stomp does not occur or the hyperthermalness does not occur or both. sent3: if the neurophysiologicalness does not occur then the hyperthermalness does not occur. sent4: the spitting happens and the hurry happens. sent5: that the extricating Armagnac does not occur is prevented by that the unrhythmicalness happens or that the Oldness does not occur or both. sent6: that the stereoscopicness does not occur is prevented by the non-hyperthermalness. sent7: that both the stomp and the extricating Armagnac happens is not right if the hyperthermalness does not occur. sent8: the extricating Armagnac does not occur. sent9: the fact that the stomp does not occur and/or the hyperthermalness occurs is not false.
that the stereoscopicness does not occur is not false.
sent4 -> int1: the spitting occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the stereoscopicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the spat and the unsoldness happens triggers the non-neurophysiologicalness. sent2: the stereoscopicness happens if the stomp does not occur or the hyperthermalness does not occur or both. sent3: if the neurophysiologicalness does not occur then the hyperthermalness does not occur. sent4: the spitting happens and the hurry happens. sent5: that the extricating Armagnac does not occur is prevented by that the unrhythmicalness happens or that the Oldness does not occur or both. sent6: that the stereoscopicness does not occur is prevented by the non-hyperthermalness. sent7: that both the stomp and the extricating Armagnac happens is not right if the hyperthermalness does not occur. sent8: the extricating Armagnac does not occur. sent9: the fact that the stomp does not occur and/or the hyperthermalness occurs is not false. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__