the adjudicativeness does not occur.
sent1: both the SNP and the snuffing defender occurs. sent2: that the patronizing Tao happens is not wrong. sent3: that the patronizing martyrdom does not occur results in that the snuffing thornbill occurs and the wholesale happens. sent4: if the atonement and the patronizing Sium occurs then the rampage does not occur. sent5: that the righting Herschel and the snuffing thornbill occurs prevents the adjudicativeness. sent6: the patronizing martyrdom does not occur if the fact that the daub occurs and the patronizing martyrdom occurs is wrong. sent7: the non-bellylessness and the dynasticness happens. sent8: the neologism and the vestibularness occurs. sent9: the righting Herschel happens if the Burmeseness happens. sent10: that the refusal occurs is brought about by that the bellylessness does not occur but the dynasticness happens. sent11: the fact that both the daubing and the patronizing martyrdom happens is incorrect. sent12: the wholesale and the patronizing martyrdom occurs if the daub does not occur. sent13: that not the Burmese but the refusal occurs is not right if the rampage does not occur.
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: the refusal occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Burmese does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Burmese does not occur but the refusal occurs.; sent6 & sent11 -> int3: the patronizing martyrdom does not occur.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the snuffing thornbill and the wholesale happens.; int4 -> int5: the snuffing thornbill occurs.;
the adjudicativeness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the adjudicativeness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the SNP and the snuffing defender occurs. sent2: that the patronizing Tao happens is not wrong. sent3: that the patronizing martyrdom does not occur results in that the snuffing thornbill occurs and the wholesale happens. sent4: if the atonement and the patronizing Sium occurs then the rampage does not occur. sent5: that the righting Herschel and the snuffing thornbill occurs prevents the adjudicativeness. sent6: the patronizing martyrdom does not occur if the fact that the daub occurs and the patronizing martyrdom occurs is wrong. sent7: the non-bellylessness and the dynasticness happens. sent8: the neologism and the vestibularness occurs. sent9: the righting Herschel happens if the Burmeseness happens. sent10: that the refusal occurs is brought about by that the bellylessness does not occur but the dynasticness happens. sent11: the fact that both the daubing and the patronizing martyrdom happens is incorrect. sent12: the wholesale and the patronizing martyrdom occurs if the daub does not occur. sent13: that not the Burmese but the refusal occurs is not right if the rampage does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: the refusal occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Burmese does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Burmese does not occur but the refusal occurs.; sent6 & sent11 -> int3: the patronizing martyrdom does not occur.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the snuffing thornbill and the wholesale happens.; int4 -> int5: the snuffing thornbill occurs.; __UNKNOWN__