the fact that the fluid is not decisive is not false.
sent1: the fact that the fluid is not mithraic is not incorrect if it is not lean and it is not a neglect. sent2: the abhorrer is either a shawny or Caroline or both. sent3: the fact that the splay is not a embroideress but it is a hesitation is incorrect if the minivan is innumerate. sent4: if something that is not a hesitation is a kind of a hypercatalectic the shambles does not bow. sent5: if the azurite is innumerate the minivan is innumerate. sent6: that something is an internment and it is a Trotskyism is not correct if it is not a kind of a bowing. sent7: the fluid is mithraic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Trotskyism and is an internment is not right. sent8: that the fluid is a kind of a Trotskyism and it is an internment does not hold. sent9: the cirrocumulus is not an internment and it is not a kind of an impact. sent10: if the fluid is both not non-lean and not a neglect it is not mithraic. sent11: that the fluid is lean but it is not a kind of a neglect does not hold. sent12: if that the fluid does not lean and does not neglect is not right then it is decisive. sent13: if the fluid is a Trotskyism it is not non-mithraic. sent14: that the fluid is a kind of non-lean a neglect is not right. sent15: if either the abhorrer is a shawny or it is Caroline or both then the toothpaste is not a Stayman. sent16: if something is not a Stayman the urn is non-chorionic or is a hypercatalectic or both. sent17: if the shambles is decisive the fluid is non-typical thing that is not a Maltese. sent18: if that the splay is not a embroideress and is a hesitation is wrong then that the urn is not a hesitation is not incorrect. sent19: the azurite is innumerate. sent20: if the urn is non-chorionic and/or a hypercatalectic then it is a hypercatalectic. sent21: the fact that something is not an internment hold if that it is not a bowing is not false. sent22: the fact that the fluid is both not a Trotskyism and an internment is wrong. sent23: the fluid is not mithraic if that it is non-lean thing that does neglect is not incorrect. sent24: the shambles is a kind of mithraic thing that is decisive if the urn is not a Trotskyism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fluid does not lean and it is not a neglect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fluid is not mithraic.; sent7 & sent22 -> int2: the fluid is mithraic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fluid does not lean and does not neglect is false.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fluid is not decisive.
sent21 -> int5: the shambles is not an internment if it is not a bowing.; sent5 & sent19 -> int6: the minivan is innumerate.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the splay is not a embroideress but it is a hesitation is incorrect.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the urn is not a hesitation.; sent15 & sent2 -> int9: the toothpaste is not a Stayman.; int9 -> int10: something is not a Stayman.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the fact that the urn is not chorionic and/or it is a kind of a hypercatalectic hold.; sent20 & int11 -> int12: the urn is a hypercatalectic.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the urn is not a kind of a hesitation but it is hypercatalectic.; int13 -> int14: something is not a hesitation but it is a hypercatalectic.; int14 & sent4 -> int15: the shambles is not a kind of a bowing.; int5 & int15 -> int16: that the shambles is not an internment is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fluid is not decisive is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fluid is not mithraic is not incorrect if it is not lean and it is not a neglect. sent2: the abhorrer is either a shawny or Caroline or both. sent3: the fact that the splay is not a embroideress but it is a hesitation is incorrect if the minivan is innumerate. sent4: if something that is not a hesitation is a kind of a hypercatalectic the shambles does not bow. sent5: if the azurite is innumerate the minivan is innumerate. sent6: that something is an internment and it is a Trotskyism is not correct if it is not a kind of a bowing. sent7: the fluid is mithraic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Trotskyism and is an internment is not right. sent8: that the fluid is a kind of a Trotskyism and it is an internment does not hold. sent9: the cirrocumulus is not an internment and it is not a kind of an impact. sent10: if the fluid is both not non-lean and not a neglect it is not mithraic. sent11: that the fluid is lean but it is not a kind of a neglect does not hold. sent12: if that the fluid does not lean and does not neglect is not right then it is decisive. sent13: if the fluid is a Trotskyism it is not non-mithraic. sent14: that the fluid is a kind of non-lean a neglect is not right. sent15: if either the abhorrer is a shawny or it is Caroline or both then the toothpaste is not a Stayman. sent16: if something is not a Stayman the urn is non-chorionic or is a hypercatalectic or both. sent17: if the shambles is decisive the fluid is non-typical thing that is not a Maltese. sent18: if that the splay is not a embroideress and is a hesitation is wrong then that the urn is not a hesitation is not incorrect. sent19: the azurite is innumerate. sent20: if the urn is non-chorionic and/or a hypercatalectic then it is a hypercatalectic. sent21: the fact that something is not an internment hold if that it is not a bowing is not false. sent22: the fact that the fluid is both not a Trotskyism and an internment is wrong. sent23: the fluid is not mithraic if that it is non-lean thing that does neglect is not incorrect. sent24: the shambles is a kind of mithraic thing that is decisive if the urn is not a Trotskyism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fluid does not lean and it is not a neglect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fluid is not mithraic.; sent7 & sent22 -> int2: the fluid is mithraic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fluid does not lean and does not neglect is false.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__