that the stake is not robotic and is not cheliferous is right.
sent1: if the binger does underlie then the stake honeys spa. sent2: the binger is not a kind of an affine if that there is something such that it is not an affine and/or it is a Northeast is correct. sent3: if that the VIP does not honey spa is right then the mayfly is not an affine and/or it is a Northeast. sent4: the VIP does not honey spa if the codpiece is not non-cheliferous and does honey spa. sent5: something is a kind of non-robotic thing that is not cheliferous if that it is not a kind of a inadvisability is not wrong. sent6: if the mayfly underlies the binger interdicts Tyranni. sent7: that a Northeast is not a kind of a inadvisability hold. sent8: something is a kind of a Northeast if it does honey spa. sent9: the codpiece is either an infernal or not robotic or both. sent10: the fact that the binger interdicts Tyranni and it underlies is not wrong. sent11: the boom is cheliferous. sent12: that the binger interdicts Tyranni is not incorrect. sent13: something that interdicts Tyranni is not non-cheliferous. sent14: if the decapod is not a liana and it does not honey spa then the codpiece does honey spa. sent15: the fact that if something is not a inadvisability then the fact that it is not cheliferous is not incorrect is true. sent16: if the codpiece is an infernal and/or is not robotic it is cheliferous.
sent10 -> int1: the binger does underlie.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the stake honeys spa.; sent8 -> int3: the stake is a Northeast if it does honey spa.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the stake is a Northeast.; sent7 -> int5: if the stake is a Northeast it is not a inadvisability.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stake is not a inadvisability.; sent5 -> int7: if the stake is not a inadvisability it is not robotic and is not cheliferous.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the stake is not robotic and it is not cheliferous is not right.
sent13 -> int8: the binger is cheliferous if the fact that it does interdict Tyranni is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the stake is not robotic and is not cheliferous is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the binger does underlie then the stake honeys spa. sent2: the binger is not a kind of an affine if that there is something such that it is not an affine and/or it is a Northeast is correct. sent3: if that the VIP does not honey spa is right then the mayfly is not an affine and/or it is a Northeast. sent4: the VIP does not honey spa if the codpiece is not non-cheliferous and does honey spa. sent5: something is a kind of non-robotic thing that is not cheliferous if that it is not a kind of a inadvisability is not wrong. sent6: if the mayfly underlies the binger interdicts Tyranni. sent7: that a Northeast is not a kind of a inadvisability hold. sent8: something is a kind of a Northeast if it does honey spa. sent9: the codpiece is either an infernal or not robotic or both. sent10: the fact that the binger interdicts Tyranni and it underlies is not wrong. sent11: the boom is cheliferous. sent12: that the binger interdicts Tyranni is not incorrect. sent13: something that interdicts Tyranni is not non-cheliferous. sent14: if the decapod is not a liana and it does not honey spa then the codpiece does honey spa. sent15: the fact that if something is not a inadvisability then the fact that it is not cheliferous is not incorrect is true. sent16: if the codpiece is an infernal and/or is not robotic it is cheliferous. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the binger does underlie.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the stake honeys spa.; sent8 -> int3: the stake is a Northeast if it does honey spa.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the stake is a Northeast.; sent7 -> int5: if the stake is a Northeast it is not a inadvisability.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stake is not a inadvisability.; sent5 -> int7: if the stake is not a inadvisability it is not robotic and is not cheliferous.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__