the rape does not consummate.
sent1: everything is empyrean thing that is allogamous. sent2: if something does commiserate coolant but it is not a kind of a palindrome it is a Carpocapsa. sent3: the potluck is a kind of a Carpocapsa. sent4: if that the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and it is not anemophilous is false the snakeblenny does ramble rhyolite. sent5: the aspen commiserates dandelion if the fact that the surfperch is a gala is true. sent6: the surfperch is a gala if it is a palindrome. sent7: the aspen is a kind of a palindrome. sent8: if the surfperch does consummate it does not commiserate dandelion and it is not semiotics. sent9: if something that does not ramble rhyolite is non-anemophilous it is a palindrome. sent10: the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and is not anemophilous if the snakeblenny is not a kind of a flavin. sent11: if something is a palindrome the fact that it is not a flavin and it does not ramble rhyolite does not hold. sent12: that the snakeblenny does not commiserate dandelion if the surfperch does not commiserate dandelion is not false. sent13: the fact that the aspen is not Democratic and it does not commiserate coolant is not correct if there exists something such that it is Democratic. sent14: the aspen is semiotics if that it is non-Democratic thing that does not commiserate coolant is false. sent15: something that is not a Carpocapsa is a kind of anemophilous thing that instructs samisen. sent16: if the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and is anemophilous then it is a kind of a palindrome. sent17: the rape does not consummate if the aspen commiserates dandelion and is semiotics. sent18: if the potluck does instruct samisen and is a Carpocapsa the snakeblenny is not a kind of a flavin. sent19: the rape does instruct samisen if the snakeblenny is not a kind of a flavin and it is not a kind of a Carpocapsa. sent20: if something does not commiserate dandelion then that it is a kind of a palindrome and it is a gala is not wrong. sent21: everything does instruct samisen and it is a Carpocapsa. sent22: everything does commiserate activism and suppurates.
sent21 -> int1: the potluck does instruct samisen and it is a Carpocapsa.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the snakeblenny is not a flavin.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and is not anemophilous.; sent9 -> int4: if the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and is not anemophilous then it is a palindrome.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the surfperch is a palindrome is not incorrect.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the surfperch is a gala.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the aspen does commiserate dandelion.;
the fact that the lion's-ear is anemophilous is not false.
sent15 -> int8: the lion's-ear is anemophilous and it does instruct samisen if it is not a Carpocapsa.; sent11 -> int9: if the snakeblenny is a palindrome the fact that it is not a flavin and it does not ramble rhyolite is incorrect.; sent20 -> int10: the snakeblenny is both a palindrome and a gala if it does not commiserate dandelion.;
$hypothesis$ = the rape does not consummate. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is empyrean thing that is allogamous. sent2: if something does commiserate coolant but it is not a kind of a palindrome it is a Carpocapsa. sent3: the potluck is a kind of a Carpocapsa. sent4: if that the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and it is not anemophilous is false the snakeblenny does ramble rhyolite. sent5: the aspen commiserates dandelion if the fact that the surfperch is a gala is true. sent6: the surfperch is a gala if it is a palindrome. sent7: the aspen is a kind of a palindrome. sent8: if the surfperch does consummate it does not commiserate dandelion and it is not semiotics. sent9: if something that does not ramble rhyolite is non-anemophilous it is a palindrome. sent10: the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and is not anemophilous if the snakeblenny is not a kind of a flavin. sent11: if something is a palindrome the fact that it is not a flavin and it does not ramble rhyolite does not hold. sent12: that the snakeblenny does not commiserate dandelion if the surfperch does not commiserate dandelion is not false. sent13: the fact that the aspen is not Democratic and it does not commiserate coolant is not correct if there exists something such that it is Democratic. sent14: the aspen is semiotics if that it is non-Democratic thing that does not commiserate coolant is false. sent15: something that is not a Carpocapsa is a kind of anemophilous thing that instructs samisen. sent16: if the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and is anemophilous then it is a kind of a palindrome. sent17: the rape does not consummate if the aspen commiserates dandelion and is semiotics. sent18: if the potluck does instruct samisen and is a Carpocapsa the snakeblenny is not a kind of a flavin. sent19: the rape does instruct samisen if the snakeblenny is not a kind of a flavin and it is not a kind of a Carpocapsa. sent20: if something does not commiserate dandelion then that it is a kind of a palindrome and it is a gala is not wrong. sent21: everything does instruct samisen and it is a Carpocapsa. sent22: everything does commiserate activism and suppurates. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: the potluck does instruct samisen and it is a Carpocapsa.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the snakeblenny is not a flavin.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and is not anemophilous.; sent9 -> int4: if the surfperch does not ramble rhyolite and is not anemophilous then it is a palindrome.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the surfperch is a palindrome is not incorrect.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the surfperch is a gala.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the aspen does commiserate dandelion.; __UNKNOWN__