the acetaldehyde is an eyespot.
sent1: if the chine is not a daisybush the hauler is not a permit and it does not boggle. sent2: if the fact that the manganite is not endodontics is not wrong then the acetaldehyde is an eyespot. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a satirist and is a Hipsurus is not correct then the headman resents Bangladeshi. sent4: the manganite is a Rhinobatidae. sent5: the chine is not epizoic if it is a kind of a revue and it is not Puranic. sent6: the fact that the succorer is a kind of a satirist and it is a kind of a Hipsurus is false if there is something such that it does not permit. sent7: the prick does resent Boswellia if the cardiologist does not resent Boswellia. sent8: the manganite is epizoic. sent9: if that something either overbears sibyl or is endodontics or both is not true then it does not resent Boswellia. sent10: if the prick does resent Boswellia then it is endodontics. sent11: the metatherian is a rustication. sent12: that the cardiologist overbears sibyl and/or it is not epizoic is not correct if that the headman does resent Bangladeshi is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the succorer does boggle and is a kind of a satirist does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a permit. sent14: if there is something such that it does not resent Bangladeshi and it is a Hipsurus the cardiologist is epizoic. sent15: if the fact that something overbears sibyl and/or is non-epizoic is false it does not resent Boswellia. sent16: the manganite is both a Rhinobatidae and not inaesthetic if it is not non-epizoic. sent17: if the fact that something does boggle and it is a satirist is wrong then it is not a kind of a satirist. sent18: everything is not a kind of a Hipsurus. sent19: the manganite does overbear sibyl and it does resent Bangladeshi if it is not a Hipsurus. sent20: if something is a Rhinobatidae and not inaesthetic it does not resent Boswellia. sent21: if something is epizoic the prick is not an eyespot. sent22: that the acetaldehyde overbears sibyl and/or is endodontics is not true if the prick is not a kind of an eyespot. sent23: the coauthor does not parallel dodder and is not a sop if the metatherian is a rustication. sent24: if something that is endodontics does not resent Boswellia it does not overbear sibyl. sent25: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a permit. sent26: the chine is not a daisybush if the coauthor does not parallel dodder and is not a sop.
sent20 -> int1: the manganite does not resent Boswellia if the fact that it is a Rhinobatidae but not inaesthetic is not false.; sent16 & sent8 -> int2: the manganite is a Rhinobatidae but it is not inaesthetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the manganite does not resent Boswellia.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the manganite is endodontics.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the manganite is endodontics but it does not resent Boswellia.; sent24 -> int5: the manganite does not overbear sibyl if it is endodontics and it does not resent Boswellia.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the manganite does not overbear sibyl.; sent18 -> int7: the manganite is not a Hipsurus.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the manganite does overbear sibyl and does resent Bangladeshi.; int8 -> int9: the manganite overbears sibyl.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the manganite is not endodontics.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the acetaldehyde does not resent Boswellia.
sent9 -> int12: the acetaldehyde does not resent Boswellia if that that it does overbear sibyl or is endodontics or both hold is not right.; sent17 -> int13: the succorer is not a satirist if that it does boggle and is a kind of a satirist does not hold.; sent25 & sent13 -> int14: that the succorer does boggle and it is a satirist is incorrect.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the succorer is not a satirist.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is not a satirist.;
$hypothesis$ = the acetaldehyde is an eyespot. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chine is not a daisybush the hauler is not a permit and it does not boggle. sent2: if the fact that the manganite is not endodontics is not wrong then the acetaldehyde is an eyespot. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a satirist and is a Hipsurus is not correct then the headman resents Bangladeshi. sent4: the manganite is a Rhinobatidae. sent5: the chine is not epizoic if it is a kind of a revue and it is not Puranic. sent6: the fact that the succorer is a kind of a satirist and it is a kind of a Hipsurus is false if there is something such that it does not permit. sent7: the prick does resent Boswellia if the cardiologist does not resent Boswellia. sent8: the manganite is epizoic. sent9: if that something either overbears sibyl or is endodontics or both is not true then it does not resent Boswellia. sent10: if the prick does resent Boswellia then it is endodontics. sent11: the metatherian is a rustication. sent12: that the cardiologist overbears sibyl and/or it is not epizoic is not correct if that the headman does resent Bangladeshi is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the succorer does boggle and is a kind of a satirist does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a permit. sent14: if there is something such that it does not resent Bangladeshi and it is a Hipsurus the cardiologist is epizoic. sent15: if the fact that something overbears sibyl and/or is non-epizoic is false it does not resent Boswellia. sent16: the manganite is both a Rhinobatidae and not inaesthetic if it is not non-epizoic. sent17: if the fact that something does boggle and it is a satirist is wrong then it is not a kind of a satirist. sent18: everything is not a kind of a Hipsurus. sent19: the manganite does overbear sibyl and it does resent Bangladeshi if it is not a Hipsurus. sent20: if something is a Rhinobatidae and not inaesthetic it does not resent Boswellia. sent21: if something is epizoic the prick is not an eyespot. sent22: that the acetaldehyde overbears sibyl and/or is endodontics is not true if the prick is not a kind of an eyespot. sent23: the coauthor does not parallel dodder and is not a sop if the metatherian is a rustication. sent24: if something that is endodontics does not resent Boswellia it does not overbear sibyl. sent25: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a permit. sent26: the chine is not a daisybush if the coauthor does not parallel dodder and is not a sop. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the manganite does not resent Boswellia if the fact that it is a Rhinobatidae but not inaesthetic is not false.; sent16 & sent8 -> int2: the manganite is a Rhinobatidae but it is not inaesthetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the manganite does not resent Boswellia.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the manganite is endodontics.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the manganite is endodontics but it does not resent Boswellia.; sent24 -> int5: the manganite does not overbear sibyl if it is endodontics and it does not resent Boswellia.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the manganite does not overbear sibyl.; sent18 -> int7: the manganite is not a Hipsurus.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the manganite does overbear sibyl and does resent Bangladeshi.; int8 -> int9: the manganite overbears sibyl.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the manganite is not endodontics.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__