the calliandra does not emulsify ringgit and does adjoin goethite.
sent1: the calliandra remodels tonometry and is a kind of a talk. sent2: something is not a gaffer but an alluring. sent3: the fact that the flageolet is earlier and it is a plum-yew is not right. sent4: that something is a gaffer but it is not an alluring is not false. sent5: the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy and it is not earlier if that it is not a talk hold. sent6: the calliandra does talk. sent7: the flageolet is ungregarious an alluring if that it is not a kind of a gaffer is right. sent8: the pinche is not ungregarious if the flageolet is earlier and is a plum-yew. sent9: if something does not emulsify cleistogamy then it is not an alluring. sent10: the lightship does adjoin goethite but it is not an alluring. sent11: if the flageolet is a kind of a plum-yew then the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy. sent12: something is not an alluring and is not a plum-yew if it does not adjoin goethite. sent13: if something that is not a gaffer is not an alluring that the calliandra does not emulsify ringgit is not wrong. sent14: the flageolet is not a kind of a plum-yew. sent15: the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy if the fact that the flageolet is earlier thing that is not a plum-yew is wrong. sent16: the lightship is not an alluring if it does not emulsify cleistogamy. sent17: if something does not emulsify cleistogamy it is not a gaffer and not an alluring. sent18: the pinche is gregarious if the flageolet is earlier thing that is not a plum-yew. sent19: the lightship is not an alluring. sent20: the flageolet is not a gaffer. sent21: everything is ungregarious.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flageolet is earlier and is not a plum-yew.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the pinche is not ungregarious.; sent21 -> int2: the pinche is ungregarious.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the flageolet is earlier but not a plum-yew is not true.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy.; sent17 -> int6: if the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy it is not a kind of a gaffer and it is not an alluring.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the lightship is not a kind of a gaffer and it is not an alluring.; int7 -> int8: something is not a gaffer and it is not an alluring.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the calliandra does not emulsify ringgit.; sent1 -> int10: the calliandra remodels tonometry.;
that the calliandra does not emulsify ringgit but it adjoins goethite is not true.
sent7 & sent20 -> int11: the flageolet is a kind of ungregarious an alluring.; int11 -> int12: the flageolet is ungregarious.;
$hypothesis$ = the calliandra does not emulsify ringgit and does adjoin goethite. ; $context$ = sent1: the calliandra remodels tonometry and is a kind of a talk. sent2: something is not a gaffer but an alluring. sent3: the fact that the flageolet is earlier and it is a plum-yew is not right. sent4: that something is a gaffer but it is not an alluring is not false. sent5: the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy and it is not earlier if that it is not a talk hold. sent6: the calliandra does talk. sent7: the flageolet is ungregarious an alluring if that it is not a kind of a gaffer is right. sent8: the pinche is not ungregarious if the flageolet is earlier and is a plum-yew. sent9: if something does not emulsify cleistogamy then it is not an alluring. sent10: the lightship does adjoin goethite but it is not an alluring. sent11: if the flageolet is a kind of a plum-yew then the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy. sent12: something is not an alluring and is not a plum-yew if it does not adjoin goethite. sent13: if something that is not a gaffer is not an alluring that the calliandra does not emulsify ringgit is not wrong. sent14: the flageolet is not a kind of a plum-yew. sent15: the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy if the fact that the flageolet is earlier thing that is not a plum-yew is wrong. sent16: the lightship is not an alluring if it does not emulsify cleistogamy. sent17: if something does not emulsify cleistogamy it is not a gaffer and not an alluring. sent18: the pinche is gregarious if the flageolet is earlier thing that is not a plum-yew. sent19: the lightship is not an alluring. sent20: the flageolet is not a gaffer. sent21: everything is ungregarious. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flageolet is earlier and is not a plum-yew.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the pinche is not ungregarious.; sent21 -> int2: the pinche is ungregarious.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the flageolet is earlier but not a plum-yew is not true.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy.; sent17 -> int6: if the lightship does not emulsify cleistogamy it is not a kind of a gaffer and it is not an alluring.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the lightship is not a kind of a gaffer and it is not an alluring.; int7 -> int8: something is not a gaffer and it is not an alluring.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the calliandra does not emulsify ringgit.; sent1 -> int10: the calliandra remodels tonometry.; __UNKNOWN__