there is something such that if it is cloze then that the fact that it wears Eigen and it is not a shawny is right is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it astringes bugbear the fact that it is postexilic and it is not a kind of a ivied does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is cloze it does wear Eigen and it is not a shawny. sent3: there is something such that if it is adynamic that it is paleocortical and is not a clavicle does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is cloze then the fact that it does wear Eigen and is a kind of a shawny is not true. sent5: if the seersucker is cloze then the fact that it wears Eigen and is a kind of a shawny is wrong. sent6: if the ruler is a tufa that it is a kind of a shawny and it is not a turgidity does not hold. sent7: if the seersucker is cloze then it wears Eigen and it is not a shawny. sent8: that there exists something such that if it is a melancholy the fact that it is a kind of a detraction and it is not a Laver is incorrect hold. sent9: there is something such that if it pairs the fact that it is a kind of fugal thing that is not a kind of a tardiness is incorrect. sent10: the fact that something rabbets savoir-faire but it is not a hacek is not right if it is cloze. sent11: if the fact that the seersucker is cloze hold then the fact that it wears Eigen and it is not a shawny is not correct. sent12: the fact that the seersucker is Viennese and not proportionate does not hold if it is distinct.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
if the gravel is cloze that it does rabbet savoir-faire and is not a hacek is incorrect.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is cloze then that the fact that it wears Eigen and it is not a shawny is right is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it astringes bugbear the fact that it is postexilic and it is not a kind of a ivied does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is cloze it does wear Eigen and it is not a shawny. sent3: there is something such that if it is adynamic that it is paleocortical and is not a clavicle does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is cloze then the fact that it does wear Eigen and is a kind of a shawny is not true. sent5: if the seersucker is cloze then the fact that it wears Eigen and is a kind of a shawny is wrong. sent6: if the ruler is a tufa that it is a kind of a shawny and it is not a turgidity does not hold. sent7: if the seersucker is cloze then it wears Eigen and it is not a shawny. sent8: that there exists something such that if it is a melancholy the fact that it is a kind of a detraction and it is not a Laver is incorrect hold. sent9: there is something such that if it pairs the fact that it is a kind of fugal thing that is not a kind of a tardiness is incorrect. sent10: the fact that something rabbets savoir-faire but it is not a hacek is not right if it is cloze. sent11: if the fact that the seersucker is cloze hold then the fact that it wears Eigen and it is not a shawny is not correct. sent12: the fact that the seersucker is Viennese and not proportionate does not hold if it is distinct. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__