the Aztec does not blank and does not clank Tepic.
sent1: the fact that the Aztec does blank but it does not clank Tepic is false. sent2: that if the fact that something does jockey Sorbonne and it is binoculars is not true then it is not a goldenseal hold. sent3: if the diamagnetism is a kind of unmanly thing that does bump the chipmunk is not a kind of a blank. sent4: if the diamagnetism is unmanly but it is not a kind of a bump the chipmunk is not a kind of a blank. sent5: if the fact that the fact that something is binoculars and is unmanly is not incorrect is not true then it does not clank Tepic. sent6: the Aztec is unmanly but it is not a blank. sent7: if the manual is not a madness the diamagnetism is a madness but not unmanly. sent8: the diamagnetism is not an adrenal. sent9: something is not a blank and it does not clank Tepic if it is intralobular. sent10: if that the fact that the diamagnetism is unmanly and it is binoculars is right is false it is not a kind of a bump. sent11: the fact that if that something is both a madness and a goldenseal is not true then it is not unmanly is right. sent12: the fact that the Aztec is a blank and a goldenseal is incorrect if the manual is not a goldenseal. sent13: the buckskin is not binoculars if it is not a blank. sent14: if there is something such that it is a madness then the fact that the buckskin jockeys Sorbonne and it is unmanly is incorrect. sent15: that the Aztec is not a blank and does not clank Tepic is not right if the chipmunk does not blank. sent16: the fact that the manual is a madness and it is a goldenseal is not true if the buckskin is not a kind of a goldenseal. sent17: that the buckskin jockeys Sorbonne and is binoculars is not right if there exists something such that it is intralobular. sent18: that the manual is not unmanly is not false if it is not a madness. sent19: there are intralobular things. sent20: the diamagnetism is unmanly but it is not a bump if the manual is not unmanly. sent21: if the manual is not a kind of a madness then it is not a blank. sent22: the manual is not invariable. sent23: if the diamagnetism is unmanly and not a madness then the manual is not a bump.
sent19 & sent17 -> int1: that the buckskin jockeys Sorbonne and it is binoculars is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: the buckskin is not a goldenseal if the fact that it jockeys Sorbonne and it is binoculars is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the buckskin is not a goldenseal.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the fact that the manual is a madness and it is a goldenseal is not right.; sent11 -> int5: the manual is not unmanly if that it is a madness and it is a goldenseal does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the manual is not unmanly hold.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: that the diamagnetism is a kind of unmanly thing that is not a bump hold.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the chipmunk is not a blank.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the Aztec is not a kind of a blank and does not clank Tepic.
sent9 -> int9: that the Aztec is not the blank and it does not clank Tepic if the Aztec is intralobular is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the Aztec does not blank and does not clank Tepic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Aztec does blank but it does not clank Tepic is false. sent2: that if the fact that something does jockey Sorbonne and it is binoculars is not true then it is not a goldenseal hold. sent3: if the diamagnetism is a kind of unmanly thing that does bump the chipmunk is not a kind of a blank. sent4: if the diamagnetism is unmanly but it is not a kind of a bump the chipmunk is not a kind of a blank. sent5: if the fact that the fact that something is binoculars and is unmanly is not incorrect is not true then it does not clank Tepic. sent6: the Aztec is unmanly but it is not a blank. sent7: if the manual is not a madness the diamagnetism is a madness but not unmanly. sent8: the diamagnetism is not an adrenal. sent9: something is not a blank and it does not clank Tepic if it is intralobular. sent10: if that the fact that the diamagnetism is unmanly and it is binoculars is right is false it is not a kind of a bump. sent11: the fact that if that something is both a madness and a goldenseal is not true then it is not unmanly is right. sent12: the fact that the Aztec is a blank and a goldenseal is incorrect if the manual is not a goldenseal. sent13: the buckskin is not binoculars if it is not a blank. sent14: if there is something such that it is a madness then the fact that the buckskin jockeys Sorbonne and it is unmanly is incorrect. sent15: that the Aztec is not a blank and does not clank Tepic is not right if the chipmunk does not blank. sent16: the fact that the manual is a madness and it is a goldenseal is not true if the buckskin is not a kind of a goldenseal. sent17: that the buckskin jockeys Sorbonne and is binoculars is not right if there exists something such that it is intralobular. sent18: that the manual is not unmanly is not false if it is not a madness. sent19: there are intralobular things. sent20: the diamagnetism is unmanly but it is not a bump if the manual is not unmanly. sent21: if the manual is not a kind of a madness then it is not a blank. sent22: the manual is not invariable. sent23: if the diamagnetism is unmanly and not a madness then the manual is not a bump. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent17 -> int1: that the buckskin jockeys Sorbonne and it is binoculars is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: the buckskin is not a goldenseal if the fact that it jockeys Sorbonne and it is binoculars is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the buckskin is not a goldenseal.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the fact that the manual is a madness and it is a goldenseal is not right.; sent11 -> int5: the manual is not unmanly if that it is a madness and it is a goldenseal does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the manual is not unmanly hold.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: that the diamagnetism is a kind of unmanly thing that is not a bump hold.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the chipmunk is not a blank.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__