that the Dorian housekeeps impenitence and is archosaurian is not correct.
sent1: that the Dorian housekeeps impenitence is not incorrect if the locust is synclinal. sent2: the conveyance does justify industrialism and justifies eristic if it is not a kind of a Magnoliidae. sent3: if the pluralist is archosaurian the Dorian is archosaurian. sent4: if the Dorian is a dragoon then the conveyance is archosaurian. sent5: if something does not housekeep Parrish then it is not a kind of a dragoon and is synclinal. sent6: if the conveyance is not a Magnoliidae then that the pluralist does not justify eristic but it justifies industrialism is not true. sent7: something is archosaurian and/or it does housekeep impenitence if it does not housekeep Parrish. sent8: the fact that the pluralist is archosaurian is true if there exists something such that it does not housekeep Parrish. sent9: if the pluralist is synclinal it does dragoon. sent10: something does not housekeep Parrish. sent11: that the fact that something housekeeps impenitence and is archosaurian is right is wrong if it is not a dragoon. sent12: the conveyance is not a kind of a Magnoliidae if the locust is not a preventive or is not a Ammotragus or both. sent13: the conveyance is a dragoon. sent14: the locust is synclinal if the conveyance does dragoon. sent15: there is something such that it housekeeps Parrish. sent16: there is something such that it is not a kind of a dragoon. sent17: the Dorian does not housekeep Parrish if the conveyance justifies industrialism.
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the locust is synclinal.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Dorian does housekeep impenitence.; sent10 & sent8 -> int3: the pluralist is archosaurian.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the Dorian is archosaurian.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the pluralist is a kind of a dragoon.
sent7 -> int5: the pluralist is archosaurian or it housekeeps impenitence or both if it does not housekeep Parrish.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Dorian housekeeps impenitence and is archosaurian is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Dorian housekeeps impenitence is not incorrect if the locust is synclinal. sent2: the conveyance does justify industrialism and justifies eristic if it is not a kind of a Magnoliidae. sent3: if the pluralist is archosaurian the Dorian is archosaurian. sent4: if the Dorian is a dragoon then the conveyance is archosaurian. sent5: if something does not housekeep Parrish then it is not a kind of a dragoon and is synclinal. sent6: if the conveyance is not a Magnoliidae then that the pluralist does not justify eristic but it justifies industrialism is not true. sent7: something is archosaurian and/or it does housekeep impenitence if it does not housekeep Parrish. sent8: the fact that the pluralist is archosaurian is true if there exists something such that it does not housekeep Parrish. sent9: if the pluralist is synclinal it does dragoon. sent10: something does not housekeep Parrish. sent11: that the fact that something housekeeps impenitence and is archosaurian is right is wrong if it is not a dragoon. sent12: the conveyance is not a kind of a Magnoliidae if the locust is not a preventive or is not a Ammotragus or both. sent13: the conveyance is a dragoon. sent14: the locust is synclinal if the conveyance does dragoon. sent15: there is something such that it housekeeps Parrish. sent16: there is something such that it is not a kind of a dragoon. sent17: the Dorian does not housekeep Parrish if the conveyance justifies industrialism. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the locust is synclinal.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Dorian does housekeep impenitence.; sent10 & sent8 -> int3: the pluralist is archosaurian.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the Dorian is archosaurian.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__