that the fuller is not a nitpicker and is not soleless is wrong.
sent1: the atorvastatin is not a kind of a jaeger if the fact that the Timothy does monopolize mizzenmast but it is not bionics is false. sent2: the fact that the atorvastatin is not a jaeger but it does monopolize restraint is not correct. sent3: the Timothy is soleless. sent4: something is not a nitpicker and it is not soleless if it is not a squash. sent5: the fuller is a cuckoo. sent6: the fact that something does not squash and it is not a cuckoo is incorrect if it is bionics. sent7: if the fact that the atorvastatin is not a jaeger and does monopolize restraint is not right it is a jaeger. sent8: the fuller monopolizes mizzenmast if the Timothy is a jaeger. sent9: the Timothy is not a kind of a grazing if the fuller is a squash and it is a cuckoo. sent10: if something is soleless it is a jaeger. sent11: that the Timothy monopolizes mizzenmast and is not bionics is not right if it is not a kind of a grazing.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fuller does squash.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the fuller does squash and it is a cuckoo.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Timothy does not graze.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the Timothy monopolizes mizzenmast but it is not bionics is not right is right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the atorvastatin is not a jaeger.; sent7 & sent2 -> int5: the atorvastatin is a jaeger.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fuller is not a kind of a squash.; sent4 -> int8: if the fuller does not squash then it is not a kind of a nitpicker and is not soleless.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the sunray is not a kind of a grazing.
sent6 -> int9: that the fuller is not a squash and it is not a cuckoo is not true if it is bionics.; sent10 -> int10: if the Timothy is soleless it is a jaeger.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the Timothy is a kind of a jaeger.; sent8 & int11 -> int12: the fuller monopolizes mizzenmast.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fuller is not a nitpicker and is not soleless is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the atorvastatin is not a kind of a jaeger if the fact that the Timothy does monopolize mizzenmast but it is not bionics is false. sent2: the fact that the atorvastatin is not a jaeger but it does monopolize restraint is not correct. sent3: the Timothy is soleless. sent4: something is not a nitpicker and it is not soleless if it is not a squash. sent5: the fuller is a cuckoo. sent6: the fact that something does not squash and it is not a cuckoo is incorrect if it is bionics. sent7: if the fact that the atorvastatin is not a jaeger and does monopolize restraint is not right it is a jaeger. sent8: the fuller monopolizes mizzenmast if the Timothy is a jaeger. sent9: the Timothy is not a kind of a grazing if the fuller is a squash and it is a cuckoo. sent10: if something is soleless it is a jaeger. sent11: that the Timothy monopolizes mizzenmast and is not bionics is not right if it is not a kind of a grazing. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fuller does squash.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the fuller does squash and it is a cuckoo.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Timothy does not graze.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the Timothy monopolizes mizzenmast but it is not bionics is not right is right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the atorvastatin is not a jaeger.; sent7 & sent2 -> int5: the atorvastatin is a jaeger.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fuller is not a kind of a squash.; sent4 -> int8: if the fuller does not squash then it is not a kind of a nitpicker and is not soleless.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__