if the fracture is complimentary then that the Delaware is not a Arafat but it does scout is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the Delaware is a Arafat and it is a kind of a scout is false. sent2: the casement is not a kind of a Arafat. sent3: the fact that the Delaware is uncomplimentary and it is a Arafat does not hold. sent4: the VLDL is a kind of a ramrod. sent5: the fact that the Delaware is not a scout but it is uncomplimentary is false. sent6: the fact that the fracture is a kind of a bourtree and does harshen stifler is wrong. sent7: the fact that the Delaware is a Arafat and it is a kind of a scout is not correct if the fracture is not uncomplimentary. sent8: the fact that something considers Poyang but it is not a pederasty is incorrect if it is not a kind of a pastoral. sent9: if the fracture is not uncomplimentary the fact that it is a bourtree that does not harshen stifler is not correct. sent10: if the fracture is not uncomplimentary then that it is a bourtree and it harshens stifler is not true. sent11: the Delaware is not a Arafat and is a scout if the fracture is not uncomplimentary. sent12: the fact that the Delaware is not a Arafat but it scouts is correct. sent13: the VLDL scouts if the fracture does harshen stifler. sent14: that the stifler does serenade sunflower and is not biomedical is not right. sent15: if the VLDL scouts then that the Delaware is not a Arafat but it is a scouts is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the Delaware is both a Arafat and a scout is not true if the VLDL is a scout. sent17: that the Delaware is not a Arafat but it is a kind of a bourtree is incorrect. sent18: that the VLDL is not a Arafat but it scouts does not hold if the Delaware is a scouts. sent19: if the fact that the fracture is a kind of a bourtree and does not harshen stifler does not hold then the VLDL is a scout. sent20: if the VLDL does scout then the Delaware is not a kind of a Arafat but it is a scout. sent21: if the VLDL is not uncomplimentary then that it harshens stifler and does not scout does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fracture is not uncomplimentary.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that that the fracture is a bourtree and does not harshen stifler is false is not incorrect.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the VLDL is a scout.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Delaware is not a Arafat and is a scout does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
if the sled is not a kind of a pastoral then the fact that it considers Poyang and is not a kind of a pederasty does not hold.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fracture is complimentary then that the Delaware is not a Arafat but it does scout is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Delaware is a Arafat and it is a kind of a scout is false. sent2: the casement is not a kind of a Arafat. sent3: the fact that the Delaware is uncomplimentary and it is a Arafat does not hold. sent4: the VLDL is a kind of a ramrod. sent5: the fact that the Delaware is not a scout but it is uncomplimentary is false. sent6: the fact that the fracture is a kind of a bourtree and does harshen stifler is wrong. sent7: the fact that the Delaware is a Arafat and it is a kind of a scout is not correct if the fracture is not uncomplimentary. sent8: the fact that something considers Poyang but it is not a pederasty is incorrect if it is not a kind of a pastoral. sent9: if the fracture is not uncomplimentary the fact that it is a bourtree that does not harshen stifler is not correct. sent10: if the fracture is not uncomplimentary then that it is a bourtree and it harshens stifler is not true. sent11: the Delaware is not a Arafat and is a scout if the fracture is not uncomplimentary. sent12: the fact that the Delaware is not a Arafat but it scouts is correct. sent13: the VLDL scouts if the fracture does harshen stifler. sent14: that the stifler does serenade sunflower and is not biomedical is not right. sent15: if the VLDL scouts then that the Delaware is not a Arafat but it is a scouts is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the Delaware is both a Arafat and a scout is not true if the VLDL is a scout. sent17: that the Delaware is not a Arafat but it is a kind of a bourtree is incorrect. sent18: that the VLDL is not a Arafat but it scouts does not hold if the Delaware is a scouts. sent19: if the fact that the fracture is a kind of a bourtree and does not harshen stifler does not hold then the VLDL is a scout. sent20: if the VLDL does scout then the Delaware is not a kind of a Arafat but it is a scout. sent21: if the VLDL is not uncomplimentary then that it harshens stifler and does not scout does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fracture is not uncomplimentary.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that that the fracture is a bourtree and does not harshen stifler is false is not incorrect.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the VLDL is a scout.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Delaware is not a Arafat and is a scout does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__