the stabilizer is not passionate.
sent1: the bowl is a shrewdness. sent2: if something is a whinchat it is not astringent or not a Baltic or both. sent3: the eiderdown is not a Baltic if the congener is not a whinchat but it is a Baltic. sent4: if the eiderdown is not Baltic and it is not passionate the fact that the stabilizer is passionate is not false. sent5: the walkingstick is not a Ancylostomatidae but it winnows Orinoco if the stabilizer is not a kind of a Baltic. sent6: if the stabilizer is a Baltic then the fact that it is not nonastringent is not incorrect. sent7: that the stabilizer is a kind of a Baltic hold. sent8: if the khanate is not a MCIA then the fact that the bowl does not winnow strongman is right. sent9: the congener is not a whinchat if the khanate is a kind of a whinchat. sent10: the fact that if there exists something such that the fact that it is unpleasant and does ignite is false the khanate is not a deflector is not false. sent11: if something is not a deflector it is not a MCIA. sent12: the bowl does not romp and it does not winnow Essex if it is unforgettable. sent13: the fact that the fact that the maypop is unpleasant and it ignites is not right hold. sent14: that the eiderdown is electrophoretic is not incorrect if the congener is a fructose. sent15: if something does not romp and it does not winnow Essex it is not a Thule. sent16: if the bowl is a shrewdness then it is not forgettable. sent17: the congener is a kind of a fructose if there is something such that it does not winnow strongman and is not a Thule. sent18: the fact that the mead does winnow strongman and it unpicks Porphyrula does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the stabilizer is not passionate but it is a Ancylostomatidae is not right.; sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the stabilizer is an astringent.;
the walkingstick is not a Ancylostomatidae but it does winnow Orinoco.
sent2 -> int2: the stabilizer is either nonastringent or not a Baltic or both if it is a kind of a whinchat.; sent11 -> int3: if the khanate is not a deflector it is not a MCIA.; sent13 -> int4: there is something such that that it is unpleasant and it ignites is not right.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the khanate is not a kind of a deflector.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the khanate is not a MCIA.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the bowl does not winnow strongman.; sent15 -> int8: if the bowl does not romp and does not winnow Essex then it is not a Thule.; sent16 & sent1 -> int9: the bowl is not forgettable.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the bowl does not romp and does not winnow Essex.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the bowl is not a kind of a Thule.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the bowl does not winnow strongman and is not a kind of a Thule.; int12 -> int13: something does not winnow strongman and it is not a Thule.; int13 & sent17 -> int14: the congener is a kind of a fructose.; sent14 & int14 -> int15: the eiderdown is electrophoretic.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is electrophoretic.;
$hypothesis$ = the stabilizer is not passionate. ; $context$ = sent1: the bowl is a shrewdness. sent2: if something is a whinchat it is not astringent or not a Baltic or both. sent3: the eiderdown is not a Baltic if the congener is not a whinchat but it is a Baltic. sent4: if the eiderdown is not Baltic and it is not passionate the fact that the stabilizer is passionate is not false. sent5: the walkingstick is not a Ancylostomatidae but it winnows Orinoco if the stabilizer is not a kind of a Baltic. sent6: if the stabilizer is a Baltic then the fact that it is not nonastringent is not incorrect. sent7: that the stabilizer is a kind of a Baltic hold. sent8: if the khanate is not a MCIA then the fact that the bowl does not winnow strongman is right. sent9: the congener is not a whinchat if the khanate is a kind of a whinchat. sent10: the fact that if there exists something such that the fact that it is unpleasant and does ignite is false the khanate is not a deflector is not false. sent11: if something is not a deflector it is not a MCIA. sent12: the bowl does not romp and it does not winnow Essex if it is unforgettable. sent13: the fact that the fact that the maypop is unpleasant and it ignites is not right hold. sent14: that the eiderdown is electrophoretic is not incorrect if the congener is a fructose. sent15: if something does not romp and it does not winnow Essex it is not a Thule. sent16: if the bowl is a shrewdness then it is not forgettable. sent17: the congener is a kind of a fructose if there is something such that it does not winnow strongman and is not a Thule. sent18: the fact that the mead does winnow strongman and it unpicks Porphyrula does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the stabilizer is not passionate but it is a Ancylostomatidae is not right.; sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the stabilizer is an astringent.; __UNKNOWN__