the jitterbug does not occur.
sent1: the conspicuousness happens. sent2: that the indiscreetness and/or the non-loudness happens is brought about by that the promoting does not occur. sent3: either the covering hopefulness does not occur or the Jovianness does not occur or both. sent4: if that the fact that the supination does not occur and the caucusing taffy does not occur is wrong is correct then the acapnicness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the caucusing Michelson does not occur and the promoting happens is not correct then the promoting does not occur. sent6: either the verdict does not occur or the devices does not occur or both. sent7: if the completion happens then the fact that the admeasuring napery happens is not wrong. sent8: that the meddling occurs causes the Browning. sent9: if that the meddling does not occur and the pursuit does not occur does not hold the Browning occurs. sent10: that the acute does not occur and the diving does not occur is not true. sent11: the conspicuousness occurs and/or the pursuit does not occur. sent12: the professorship occurs. sent13: if the fact that the fact that the fibrillation does not occur and the floriculture does not occur is not right is not false then the impenitentness happens. sent14: that the Browning occurs triggers that the jitterbug happens. sent15: the admeasuring victimizer does not occur. sent16: that the conspicuousness does not occur and/or the pursuit does not occur is not true. sent17: the meddling does not occur. sent18: either the covering bookishness does not occur or the pedicuring does not occur or both. sent19: that the meddling happens but the pursuit does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meddling does not occur and the pursuit does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the pursuit does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the conspicuousness does not occur and/or the pursuit does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the meddling does not occur and the pursuit does not occur is not correct.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the Browning happens.; sent14 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the jitterbuging does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the jitterbug does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the conspicuousness happens. sent2: that the indiscreetness and/or the non-loudness happens is brought about by that the promoting does not occur. sent3: either the covering hopefulness does not occur or the Jovianness does not occur or both. sent4: if that the fact that the supination does not occur and the caucusing taffy does not occur is wrong is correct then the acapnicness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the caucusing Michelson does not occur and the promoting happens is not correct then the promoting does not occur. sent6: either the verdict does not occur or the devices does not occur or both. sent7: if the completion happens then the fact that the admeasuring napery happens is not wrong. sent8: that the meddling occurs causes the Browning. sent9: if that the meddling does not occur and the pursuit does not occur does not hold the Browning occurs. sent10: that the acute does not occur and the diving does not occur is not true. sent11: the conspicuousness occurs and/or the pursuit does not occur. sent12: the professorship occurs. sent13: if the fact that the fact that the fibrillation does not occur and the floriculture does not occur is not right is not false then the impenitentness happens. sent14: that the Browning occurs triggers that the jitterbug happens. sent15: the admeasuring victimizer does not occur. sent16: that the conspicuousness does not occur and/or the pursuit does not occur is not true. sent17: the meddling does not occur. sent18: either the covering bookishness does not occur or the pedicuring does not occur or both. sent19: that the meddling happens but the pursuit does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meddling does not occur and the pursuit does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the pursuit does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the conspicuousness does not occur and/or the pursuit does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the meddling does not occur and the pursuit does not occur is not correct.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the Browning happens.; sent14 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__