the affinity happens.
sent1: either that the volleyball occurs or that the convulsing happens or both is caused by that the scatology does not occur. sent2: the affinity is triggered by that the embowering sprawler happens. sent3: if the quack does not occur then the ECCM or the exhilarating poncho or both occurs. sent4: the conformistness does not occur or the decocting does not occur or both if the embowering mouthpiece happens. sent5: the adagio and/or the starchyness happens if the ransom does not occur. sent6: the quacking does not occur if the fact that the embowering canopied happens and the distortion occurs does not hold. sent7: the fact that not the anatomicness but the embowering Humvee occurs is not true if the quack does not occur. sent8: the embowering kuvasz occurs. sent9: the embowering Humvee does not occur if the fact that the fact that not the anatomicness but the embowering Humvee happens is correct is incorrect. sent10: if the decocting does not occur and/or the embowering sprawler does not occur the embowering sprawler does not occur. sent11: that the affinity does not occur is brought about by the scatology. sent12: if the convulsing occurs then the unimpressionableness occurs. sent13: the embowering sprawler occurs if the unimpressionableness occurs. sent14: that the toll-freeness and the adagio happens is triggered by the non-starchlessness. sent15: the impreciseness but not the ransoming occurs if the embowering Humvee does not occur. sent16: that the conformist but not the embowering mouthpiece occurs is caused by the non-toll-freeness. sent17: that the exhilarating Cachi does not occur yields that the embowering kuvasz and/or the benignness occurs. sent18: the non-starchlessness or the ransoming or both happens. sent19: that the conformistness occurs brings about that the decocting does not occur or the embowering sprawler does not occur or both. sent20: the starchlessness does not occur if the starchlessnessness and/or the ransom occurs. sent21: that the scatology does not occur is not incorrect. sent22: the toll-freeness prevents that the embowering mouthpiece does not occur.
sent1 & sent21 -> int1: the volleyball occurs or the convulsing happens or both.;
the distortion happens.
sent20 & sent18 -> int2: the starchlessness does not occur.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: the toll-freeness occurs and the adagio occurs.; int3 -> int4: the toll-freeness happens.; sent22 & int4 -> int5: the embowering mouthpiece occurs.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the conformistness does not occur and/or the decocting does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the affinity happens. ; $context$ = sent1: either that the volleyball occurs or that the convulsing happens or both is caused by that the scatology does not occur. sent2: the affinity is triggered by that the embowering sprawler happens. sent3: if the quack does not occur then the ECCM or the exhilarating poncho or both occurs. sent4: the conformistness does not occur or the decocting does not occur or both if the embowering mouthpiece happens. sent5: the adagio and/or the starchyness happens if the ransom does not occur. sent6: the quacking does not occur if the fact that the embowering canopied happens and the distortion occurs does not hold. sent7: the fact that not the anatomicness but the embowering Humvee occurs is not true if the quack does not occur. sent8: the embowering kuvasz occurs. sent9: the embowering Humvee does not occur if the fact that the fact that not the anatomicness but the embowering Humvee happens is correct is incorrect. sent10: if the decocting does not occur and/or the embowering sprawler does not occur the embowering sprawler does not occur. sent11: that the affinity does not occur is brought about by the scatology. sent12: if the convulsing occurs then the unimpressionableness occurs. sent13: the embowering sprawler occurs if the unimpressionableness occurs. sent14: that the toll-freeness and the adagio happens is triggered by the non-starchlessness. sent15: the impreciseness but not the ransoming occurs if the embowering Humvee does not occur. sent16: that the conformist but not the embowering mouthpiece occurs is caused by the non-toll-freeness. sent17: that the exhilarating Cachi does not occur yields that the embowering kuvasz and/or the benignness occurs. sent18: the non-starchlessness or the ransoming or both happens. sent19: that the conformistness occurs brings about that the decocting does not occur or the embowering sprawler does not occur or both. sent20: the starchlessness does not occur if the starchlessnessness and/or the ransom occurs. sent21: that the scatology does not occur is not incorrect. sent22: the toll-freeness prevents that the embowering mouthpiece does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent21 -> int1: the volleyball occurs or the convulsing happens or both.; __UNKNOWN__