the haulm is not crural.
sent1: if the tornado is not non-Tibetan it does not expire bracken. sent2: the bracken either is not a anxiolytic or is cardiac or both. sent3: if something is a kind of a iodoprotein that is a Levisticum then the fact that it is articulated is not incorrect. sent4: if the nidus is not unusual and it is not a beetle the neutron is not tetragonal. sent5: something that is not a humanist is not unusual and not a beetle. sent6: the fact that the haulm is non-unusual hold. sent7: the haulm does not riposte. sent8: something is not a riposte and does chariot if it is not crural. sent9: if something is not an eclipse then it is not a pasta. sent10: if the haulm does not collogue Snellen it is not a variation and it is a kind of a HTTP. sent11: if something is a XXX it is not a kingship. sent12: the fact that the neutron does not collogue Snellen is not right if the haulm does collogue Snellen. sent13: the miter does not expire Nilotic. sent14: the haulm is not a sulfa. sent15: if something expires Nilotic then it does not collogue Snellen. sent16: there exists nothing such that it does not expire Nilotic and is unusual. sent17: if something that does not riposte is a chariot it does collogue Snellen. sent18: the fact that the neutron does expire Nilotic and is unusual does not hold. sent19: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a locoism and it is fungoid. sent20: if that that the neutron does not expire Nilotic but it is unusual does not hold hold then the fact that the haulm expire Nilotic is not incorrect. sent21: the lee is not a kind of a anxiolytic if the bracken is not anxiolytic and/or is cardiac. sent22: if something is not crural it is not a riposte. sent23: if the haulm does riposte and is a kind of a chariot it does collogue Snellen. sent24: that something expires Nilotic and it collogues Snellen is not right if it is not tetragonal.
sent8 -> int1: the haulm is not a kind of a riposte and is a chariot if it is not crural.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the haulm is not crural.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the haulm is not a riposte but it is a chariot.; sent17 -> int3: if the haulm is not a riposte but it chariots then it collogues Snellen.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the haulm does collogue Snellen.; sent15 -> int5: the haulm does not collogue Snellen if it does expire Nilotic.; sent16 -> int6: that the neutron does not expire Nilotic and is unusual does not hold.; sent20 & int6 -> int7: the haulm does expire Nilotic.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the haulm does not collogue Snellen.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the haulm is not crural.
sent24 -> int10: if the neutron is not tetragonal then the fact that it expires Nilotic and collogues Snellen is not correct.; sent5 -> int11: if the nidus is not a humanist it is not unusual and it does not beetle.; sent21 & sent2 -> int12: the lee is not a kind of a anxiolytic.; int12 -> int13: something is not a kind of a anxiolytic.;
$hypothesis$ = the haulm is not crural. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tornado is not non-Tibetan it does not expire bracken. sent2: the bracken either is not a anxiolytic or is cardiac or both. sent3: if something is a kind of a iodoprotein that is a Levisticum then the fact that it is articulated is not incorrect. sent4: if the nidus is not unusual and it is not a beetle the neutron is not tetragonal. sent5: something that is not a humanist is not unusual and not a beetle. sent6: the fact that the haulm is non-unusual hold. sent7: the haulm does not riposte. sent8: something is not a riposte and does chariot if it is not crural. sent9: if something is not an eclipse then it is not a pasta. sent10: if the haulm does not collogue Snellen it is not a variation and it is a kind of a HTTP. sent11: if something is a XXX it is not a kingship. sent12: the fact that the neutron does not collogue Snellen is not right if the haulm does collogue Snellen. sent13: the miter does not expire Nilotic. sent14: the haulm is not a sulfa. sent15: if something expires Nilotic then it does not collogue Snellen. sent16: there exists nothing such that it does not expire Nilotic and is unusual. sent17: if something that does not riposte is a chariot it does collogue Snellen. sent18: the fact that the neutron does expire Nilotic and is unusual does not hold. sent19: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a locoism and it is fungoid. sent20: if that that the neutron does not expire Nilotic but it is unusual does not hold hold then the fact that the haulm expire Nilotic is not incorrect. sent21: the lee is not a kind of a anxiolytic if the bracken is not anxiolytic and/or is cardiac. sent22: if something is not crural it is not a riposte. sent23: if the haulm does riposte and is a kind of a chariot it does collogue Snellen. sent24: that something expires Nilotic and it collogues Snellen is not right if it is not tetragonal. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the haulm is not a kind of a riposte and is a chariot if it is not crural.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the haulm is not crural.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the haulm is not a riposte but it is a chariot.; sent17 -> int3: if the haulm is not a riposte but it chariots then it collogues Snellen.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the haulm does collogue Snellen.; sent15 -> int5: the haulm does not collogue Snellen if it does expire Nilotic.; sent16 -> int6: that the neutron does not expire Nilotic and is unusual does not hold.; sent20 & int6 -> int7: the haulm does expire Nilotic.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the haulm does not collogue Snellen.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__