the kneading does not occur.
sent1: if that the overawing classical occurs and the napoleon happens is false that the isolationistness does not occur hold. sent2: if the overawing Qum does not occur not the kneading but the isolationist happens. sent3: that the overawing classical and the napoleon occurs is wrong if the kneading does not occur. sent4: if that the tagging rissole occurs hold then the oath does not occur and the neurobiologicalness does not occur. sent5: the fact that if that the tagging bombardon does not occur is not incorrect then both the isolationist and the overawing Qum happens is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the overawing Qum occurs is correct. sent7: that the overawing Qum occurs is prevented by that the oath does not occur but the tagging bombardon occurs. sent8: the tagging bombardon does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kneading does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the overawing classical occurs and the napoleon occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the isolationistness does not occur.; sent5 & sent8 -> int3: the isolationistness happens and the overawing Qum happens.; int3 -> int4: the isolationistness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the kneading does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the kneading does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the overawing classical occurs and the napoleon happens is false that the isolationistness does not occur hold. sent2: if the overawing Qum does not occur not the kneading but the isolationist happens. sent3: that the overawing classical and the napoleon occurs is wrong if the kneading does not occur. sent4: if that the tagging rissole occurs hold then the oath does not occur and the neurobiologicalness does not occur. sent5: the fact that if that the tagging bombardon does not occur is not incorrect then both the isolationist and the overawing Qum happens is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the overawing Qum occurs is correct. sent7: that the overawing Qum occurs is prevented by that the oath does not occur but the tagging bombardon occurs. sent8: the tagging bombardon does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kneading does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the overawing classical occurs and the napoleon occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the isolationistness does not occur.; sent5 & sent8 -> int3: the isolationistness happens and the overawing Qum happens.; int3 -> int4: the isolationistness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__