the terpene does nuke.
sent1: the auxin is a cypress and it does rehabilitate Huron if there exists something such that it rehabilitates Very-light. sent2: something nukes if it is a cypress. sent3: that the proconvertin rehabilitates Very-light hold. sent4: the fact that the terpene is not postwar but it is interior is incorrect. sent5: something does not nuke if it is not postwar and not interior. sent6: if the bottlecap does not labor terpene then the fact that the eelblenny labor terpene but it is not kind does not hold. sent7: That the Very-light rehabilitates proconvertin hold. sent8: if the fact that the terpene labors terpene and is not kind is not right the eelblenny does not nuke. sent9: if the fact that the terpene is not postwar and it is not interior is not true the bottlecap does not labor terpene. sent10: the auxin is not a cypress if the fact that the eelblenny does labor terpene and is not kind is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the terpene is non-postwar and it is not interior is not true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the bottlecap does not labor terpene.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the eelblenny labors terpene but it is not a kind of a kind is wrong.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the auxin is not a kind of a cypress.; sent3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does rehabilitate Very-light.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the auxin is a cypress and rehabilitates Huron.; int5 -> int6: the auxin is a kind of a cypress.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the terpene is not postwar and it is not interior.; sent5 -> int9: if the terpene is not postwar and is not interior then it is not a nuke.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the terpene does nuke.
sent2 -> int10: if the terpene is a kind of a cypress the fact that it nukes is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the terpene does nuke. ; $context$ = sent1: the auxin is a cypress and it does rehabilitate Huron if there exists something such that it rehabilitates Very-light. sent2: something nukes if it is a cypress. sent3: that the proconvertin rehabilitates Very-light hold. sent4: the fact that the terpene is not postwar but it is interior is incorrect. sent5: something does not nuke if it is not postwar and not interior. sent6: if the bottlecap does not labor terpene then the fact that the eelblenny labor terpene but it is not kind does not hold. sent7: That the Very-light rehabilitates proconvertin hold. sent8: if the fact that the terpene labors terpene and is not kind is not right the eelblenny does not nuke. sent9: if the fact that the terpene is not postwar and it is not interior is not true the bottlecap does not labor terpene. sent10: the auxin is not a cypress if the fact that the eelblenny does labor terpene and is not kind is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the terpene is non-postwar and it is not interior is not true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the bottlecap does not labor terpene.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the eelblenny labors terpene but it is not a kind of a kind is wrong.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the auxin is not a kind of a cypress.; sent3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does rehabilitate Very-light.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the auxin is a cypress and rehabilitates Huron.; int5 -> int6: the auxin is a kind of a cypress.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the terpene is not postwar and it is not interior.; sent5 -> int9: if the terpene is not postwar and is not interior then it is not a nuke.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__