the lathe is not a Revelation but it is a pyrrhic if the Cabernet is a camera.
sent1: the fact that the lathe is a pyrrhic but it is not a kind of a camera does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Cabernet does monopolize exordium and is a Revelation is not right. sent3: that the Cabernet is arbitrative is not wrong if that it is not an aide hold. sent4: something does not tribulate eel and is not a module. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is an aide and it is a camera does not hold. sent6: if something does tribulate kleptomaniac it is not a camera. sent7: either the lathe does monopolize Othello or it is arbitrative or both. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of an aide and is not a camera is false then the hydrolysate does tribulate kleptomaniac. sent9: the fact that the Cabernet is not an aide hold. sent10: the fact that the lathe is not a module but arbitrative is right if the hydrolysate tribulates kleptomaniac. sent11: the hydrolysate does tribulate kleptomaniac if there exists something such that it is an aide and not a camera. sent12: if something does tribulate eel then it is not a Revelation. sent13: the fact that the feeder is not a kind of a Revelation and it does not import is incorrect. sent14: there is something such that it monopolizes redundancy. sent15: that the Etna does not tribulate eel and it is not a module is wrong. sent16: there exists something such that that it does not clamor feeder is not false. sent17: something that either monopolizes Othello or is not arbitrative or both is pyrrhic. sent18: if the hydrolysate does tribulate kleptomaniac then either the lathe does monopolize Othello or it is not arbitrative or both.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Cabernet is an aide but it is not a camera.; assump2 -> int1: the Cabernet is not a camera.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cabernet is a camera.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the Cabernet is an aide but it is not a camera does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is an aide and is not a camera does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the hydrolysate does tribulate kleptomaniac.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: either the lathe does monopolize Othello or it is non-arbitrative or both.; sent17 -> int7: if the lathe monopolizes Othello or it is not arbitrative or both then it is a pyrrhic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the lathe is a kind of a pyrrhic.; sent12 -> int9: the lathe is not a Revelation if it tribulates eel.; sent15 -> int10: there is something such that that it does not tribulate eel and is not a module is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the lathe is not a Revelation but it is a pyrrhic if the Cabernet is a camera. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the lathe is a pyrrhic but it is not a kind of a camera does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Cabernet does monopolize exordium and is a Revelation is not right. sent3: that the Cabernet is arbitrative is not wrong if that it is not an aide hold. sent4: something does not tribulate eel and is not a module. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is an aide and it is a camera does not hold. sent6: if something does tribulate kleptomaniac it is not a camera. sent7: either the lathe does monopolize Othello or it is arbitrative or both. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of an aide and is not a camera is false then the hydrolysate does tribulate kleptomaniac. sent9: the fact that the Cabernet is not an aide hold. sent10: the fact that the lathe is not a module but arbitrative is right if the hydrolysate tribulates kleptomaniac. sent11: the hydrolysate does tribulate kleptomaniac if there exists something such that it is an aide and not a camera. sent12: if something does tribulate eel then it is not a Revelation. sent13: the fact that the feeder is not a kind of a Revelation and it does not import is incorrect. sent14: there is something such that it monopolizes redundancy. sent15: that the Etna does not tribulate eel and it is not a module is wrong. sent16: there exists something such that that it does not clamor feeder is not false. sent17: something that either monopolizes Othello or is not arbitrative or both is pyrrhic. sent18: if the hydrolysate does tribulate kleptomaniac then either the lathe does monopolize Othello or it is not arbitrative or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Cabernet is an aide but it is not a camera.; assump2 -> int1: the Cabernet is not a camera.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cabernet is a camera.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the Cabernet is an aide but it is not a camera does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is an aide and is not a camera does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the hydrolysate does tribulate kleptomaniac.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: either the lathe does monopolize Othello or it is non-arbitrative or both.; sent17 -> int7: if the lathe monopolizes Othello or it is not arbitrative or both then it is a pyrrhic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the lathe is a kind of a pyrrhic.; sent12 -> int9: the lathe is not a Revelation if it tribulates eel.; sent15 -> int10: there is something such that that it does not tribulate eel and is not a module is not right.; __UNKNOWN__