the perennial is a kind of a surcoat.
sent1: if the heme does not gum then that the kiang is not an accompanist but it is a kind of a wristlet is not right. sent2: that the saddlebag does not supplicate hold if the calceus is a kind of a Qatar that stigmatizes JV. sent3: if that the beachwear does not perplex whitewashed and peels is not right then the ganglion does not perplex whitewashed. sent4: that the ganglion is not biogenic but it supplicates if the ganglion does not perplex whitewashed is right. sent5: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Qatar then the calceus stigmatizes JV and/or it is a Qatar. sent6: the ganglion is not a Qatar if the calceus is biogenic thing that does supplicate. sent7: that the ganglion does supplicate but it is not biogenic does not hold if the saddlebag does not supplicate. sent8: if the horoscope does not bellow then the lipoprotein is a gum but not a highball. sent9: that the heme is not a gum hold if the lipoprotein does gum and is not a highball. sent10: the fact that the ganglion does not supplicate and is not biogenic does not hold if the saddlebag does not supplicate. sent11: the calceus does stigmatize JV. sent12: The JV does stigmatize calceus. sent13: that something does not perplex whitewashed and is a peel is false if the fact that it is not a deciliter is not incorrect. sent14: that the ganglion does supplicate and is not biogenic is incorrect. sent15: the horoscope is not a bellow. sent16: if the ganglion supplicates that the perennial is a kind of a surcoat is correct. sent17: the saddlebag is a Qatar if a non-biogenic thing does supplicate. sent18: that the calceus does not supplicate and is not a Qatar does not hold. sent19: that the perennial is not a kind of a surcoat and does not stigmatize JV does not hold if the calceus is not a surcoat. sent20: if the fact that the ganglion does not supplicate and is not biogenic does not hold the perennial is a surcoat.
the perennial is not a surcoat.
sent13 -> int1: that the beachwear does not perplex whitewashed and is a peel is not true if it is not a deciliter.; sent8 & sent15 -> int2: the lipoprotein is both a gum and not a highball.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the heme is not a gum.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the kiang is not an accompanist and is a wristlet is not right.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is both not an accompanist and a wristlet is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the perennial is a kind of a surcoat. ; $context$ = sent1: if the heme does not gum then that the kiang is not an accompanist but it is a kind of a wristlet is not right. sent2: that the saddlebag does not supplicate hold if the calceus is a kind of a Qatar that stigmatizes JV. sent3: if that the beachwear does not perplex whitewashed and peels is not right then the ganglion does not perplex whitewashed. sent4: that the ganglion is not biogenic but it supplicates if the ganglion does not perplex whitewashed is right. sent5: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Qatar then the calceus stigmatizes JV and/or it is a Qatar. sent6: the ganglion is not a Qatar if the calceus is biogenic thing that does supplicate. sent7: that the ganglion does supplicate but it is not biogenic does not hold if the saddlebag does not supplicate. sent8: if the horoscope does not bellow then the lipoprotein is a gum but not a highball. sent9: that the heme is not a gum hold if the lipoprotein does gum and is not a highball. sent10: the fact that the ganglion does not supplicate and is not biogenic does not hold if the saddlebag does not supplicate. sent11: the calceus does stigmatize JV. sent12: The JV does stigmatize calceus. sent13: that something does not perplex whitewashed and is a peel is false if the fact that it is not a deciliter is not incorrect. sent14: that the ganglion does supplicate and is not biogenic is incorrect. sent15: the horoscope is not a bellow. sent16: if the ganglion supplicates that the perennial is a kind of a surcoat is correct. sent17: the saddlebag is a Qatar if a non-biogenic thing does supplicate. sent18: that the calceus does not supplicate and is not a Qatar does not hold. sent19: that the perennial is not a kind of a surcoat and does not stigmatize JV does not hold if the calceus is not a surcoat. sent20: if the fact that the ganglion does not supplicate and is not biogenic does not hold the perennial is a surcoat. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__