if the repressing sac does not occur then both the non-bubonicness and the laxativeness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the repressing acetaldehyde occurs and the downsizing occurs is false. sent2: if the laxative does not occur then the repressing sac or the non-bubonicness or both occurs. sent3: the repressing sac happens if that the repressing acetaldehyde happens and the downsizing does not occur is wrong. sent4: that the drunkenness happens and the laxativeness occurs is brought about by that the deflection does not occur. sent5: the bubonicness is prevented by that the downsizing does not occur. sent6: the deflection does not occur. sent7: the non-mass-spectrometricness is brought about by either the repressing sac or the non-bubonicness or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the repressing acetaldehyde happens but the downsizing does not occur is not right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the repressing sac happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the repressing sac does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the repressing acetaldehyde but not the downsizing happens.; int3 -> int4: the downsizing does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the bubonicness does not occur.; sent4 & sent6 -> int6: both the drunkenness and the laxativeness happens.; int6 -> int7: the laxativeness occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the non-bubonicness and the laxative occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the mass-spectrometricness does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = if the repressing sac does not occur then both the non-bubonicness and the laxativeness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the repressing acetaldehyde occurs and the downsizing occurs is false. sent2: if the laxative does not occur then the repressing sac or the non-bubonicness or both occurs. sent3: the repressing sac happens if that the repressing acetaldehyde happens and the downsizing does not occur is wrong. sent4: that the drunkenness happens and the laxativeness occurs is brought about by that the deflection does not occur. sent5: the bubonicness is prevented by that the downsizing does not occur. sent6: the deflection does not occur. sent7: the non-mass-spectrometricness is brought about by either the repressing sac or the non-bubonicness or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the repressing acetaldehyde happens but the downsizing does not occur is not right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the repressing sac happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the repressing sac does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the repressing acetaldehyde but not the downsizing happens.; int3 -> int4: the downsizing does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the bubonicness does not occur.; sent4 & sent6 -> int6: both the drunkenness and the laxativeness happens.; int6 -> int7: the laxativeness occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the non-bubonicness and the laxative occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__