the fact that the drinking dogtrot does not occur and/or the face occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the rallying does not occur if the anoxemicness occurs and the fabrication does not occur. sent2: the anoxemicness occurs and the slice happens if the drinking saving does not occur. sent3: the spending does not occur. sent4: if that the unfairness does not occur and the spiccato does not occur does not hold the crayon happens. sent5: the fact that the drinking mash does not occur and/or the accomplishing occurs is not true if the spending does not occur. sent6: the spending does not occur if that the spending happens and the veneering does not occur is wrong. sent7: the fact that both the unfairness and the thwack happens is not wrong if the rallying does not occur. sent8: that the veneering does not occur and the spending occurs does not hold if the crayoning happens. sent9: if the drinking dogtrot does not occur and/or the facing occurs the veneering occurs. sent10: that the veneering occurs is triggered by that the drinking dogtrot does not occur. sent11: that the drinking saving does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the drinking dogtrot happens. sent13: either the twiddling does not occur or the lowland happens or both. sent14: the spending does not occur if the fact that the veneering does not occur and the spending happens does not hold. sent15: that the emoting Laurel does not occur and/or the horse-drawnness occurs is not true. sent16: that the beat does not occur and/or that the climb occurs leads to that the collision occurs. sent17: the fact that the fluttering does not occur and/or the emoting pulasan happens is wrong. sent18: if the crayon occurs then that the spending occurs but the veneering does not occur is not correct. sent19: the tarrying happens and/or the surgicalness occurs. sent20: that the crayon but not the spiccato happens is brought about by that the unfairness occurs. sent21: either the denationalizing angstrom occurs or the volatile happens or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drinking dogtrot does not occur and/or the facing happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the veneering happens.;
that either the drinking mash does not occur or the accomplishing occurs or both is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the drinking dogtrot does not occur and/or the face occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the rallying does not occur if the anoxemicness occurs and the fabrication does not occur. sent2: the anoxemicness occurs and the slice happens if the drinking saving does not occur. sent3: the spending does not occur. sent4: if that the unfairness does not occur and the spiccato does not occur does not hold the crayon happens. sent5: the fact that the drinking mash does not occur and/or the accomplishing occurs is not true if the spending does not occur. sent6: the spending does not occur if that the spending happens and the veneering does not occur is wrong. sent7: the fact that both the unfairness and the thwack happens is not wrong if the rallying does not occur. sent8: that the veneering does not occur and the spending occurs does not hold if the crayoning happens. sent9: if the drinking dogtrot does not occur and/or the facing occurs the veneering occurs. sent10: that the veneering occurs is triggered by that the drinking dogtrot does not occur. sent11: that the drinking saving does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the drinking dogtrot happens. sent13: either the twiddling does not occur or the lowland happens or both. sent14: the spending does not occur if the fact that the veneering does not occur and the spending happens does not hold. sent15: that the emoting Laurel does not occur and/or the horse-drawnness occurs is not true. sent16: that the beat does not occur and/or that the climb occurs leads to that the collision occurs. sent17: the fact that the fluttering does not occur and/or the emoting pulasan happens is wrong. sent18: if the crayon occurs then that the spending occurs but the veneering does not occur is not correct. sent19: the tarrying happens and/or the surgicalness occurs. sent20: that the crayon but not the spiccato happens is brought about by that the unfairness occurs. sent21: either the denationalizing angstrom occurs or the volatile happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drinking dogtrot does not occur and/or the facing happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the veneering happens.; __UNKNOWN__