that the annelid is a kind of non-adrenergic thing that is lax does not hold.
sent1: the fact that something is not a Vlaminck but a valuable does not hold if it is a exhibitionism. sent2: the Thatcherite is unclear. sent3: the fact that the Thatcherite is not dictyopteran and is non-on-site is not true if the fescue is dictyopteran. sent4: if the fact that something is not dictyopteran and it is not on-site is incorrect then that it is lax is not wrong. sent5: if the fescue is not a exhibitionism then the annelid is not a adrenergic and is lax. sent6: the fescue is a exhibitionism and dictyopteran. sent7: if that the Thatcherite is lax is correct the fact that the annelid is not a adrenergic but it is lax is not correct. sent8: if the fescue is a exhibitionism then the fact that the annelid is both not a exhibitionism and not a adrenergic is not right. sent9: the fescue is not non-on-site. sent10: the trigonometrician is a kind of a exhibitionism if the fescue is a exhibitionism. sent11: if the Thatcherite is on-site then the fact that the fescue is not on-site and is not a exhibitionism is not correct.
sent6 -> int1: the fescue is dictyopteran.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the Thatcherite is non-dictyopteran and non-on-site is not correct.; sent4 -> int3: the Thatcherite is lax if the fact that it is not dictyopteran and it is not on-site does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Thatcherite is lax.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the trigonometrician is not a Vlaminck but it is valuable is not correct.
sent1 -> int5: the fact that the trigonometrician is not a Vlaminck but it is a valuable is not true if it is a kind of a exhibitionism.;
$hypothesis$ = that the annelid is a kind of non-adrenergic thing that is lax does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a Vlaminck but a valuable does not hold if it is a exhibitionism. sent2: the Thatcherite is unclear. sent3: the fact that the Thatcherite is not dictyopteran and is non-on-site is not true if the fescue is dictyopteran. sent4: if the fact that something is not dictyopteran and it is not on-site is incorrect then that it is lax is not wrong. sent5: if the fescue is not a exhibitionism then the annelid is not a adrenergic and is lax. sent6: the fescue is a exhibitionism and dictyopteran. sent7: if that the Thatcherite is lax is correct the fact that the annelid is not a adrenergic but it is lax is not correct. sent8: if the fescue is a exhibitionism then the fact that the annelid is both not a exhibitionism and not a adrenergic is not right. sent9: the fescue is not non-on-site. sent10: the trigonometrician is a kind of a exhibitionism if the fescue is a exhibitionism. sent11: if the Thatcherite is on-site then the fact that the fescue is not on-site and is not a exhibitionism is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fescue is dictyopteran.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the Thatcherite is non-dictyopteran and non-on-site is not correct.; sent4 -> int3: the Thatcherite is lax if the fact that it is not dictyopteran and it is not on-site does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Thatcherite is lax.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__