the fact that the rinse does not subvocalize is correct.
sent1: the sister is a kind of an affected if that the megathere does adapt laxative is not incorrect. sent2: the sniper adapts conglomerate. sent3: the megathere adapts laxative if the secretary is not gynecological but it is rhizoidal. sent4: the rinse is not savory and/or it is not an affected if the sister is a kind of an affected. sent5: The Albion does adapt sniper. sent6: The conglomerate adapts sniper. sent7: the secretary is a mistake and it is rhizoidal if there exists something such that it is a brownstone. sent8: the secretary is not gynecological if something that does adapt conglomerate adapts Albion. sent9: if something is not a savory or is not an affected or both then it subvocalizes. sent10: the sniper does adapt Albion. sent11: something is a brownstone.
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the sniper does adapt conglomerate and adapts Albion.; int1 -> int2: something does adapt conglomerate and does adapt Albion.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the secretary is not gynecological.; sent11 & sent7 -> int4: the secretary is a mistake and it is rhizoidal.; int4 -> int5: the secretary is rhizoidal.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the secretary is a kind of non-gynecological thing that is rhizoidal.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the megathere does adapt laxative.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the sister is an affected.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: either the rinse is unsavory or it is not an affected or both.; sent9 -> int10: if that the rinse is not a savory and/or is not a kind of an affected hold it subvocalizes.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the rinse does not subvocalize is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the sister is a kind of an affected if that the megathere does adapt laxative is not incorrect. sent2: the sniper adapts conglomerate. sent3: the megathere adapts laxative if the secretary is not gynecological but it is rhizoidal. sent4: the rinse is not savory and/or it is not an affected if the sister is a kind of an affected. sent5: The Albion does adapt sniper. sent6: The conglomerate adapts sniper. sent7: the secretary is a mistake and it is rhizoidal if there exists something such that it is a brownstone. sent8: the secretary is not gynecological if something that does adapt conglomerate adapts Albion. sent9: if something is not a savory or is not an affected or both then it subvocalizes. sent10: the sniper does adapt Albion. sent11: something is a brownstone. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the sniper does adapt conglomerate and adapts Albion.; int1 -> int2: something does adapt conglomerate and does adapt Albion.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the secretary is not gynecological.; sent11 & sent7 -> int4: the secretary is a mistake and it is rhizoidal.; int4 -> int5: the secretary is rhizoidal.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the secretary is a kind of non-gynecological thing that is rhizoidal.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the megathere does adapt laxative.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the sister is an affected.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: either the rinse is unsavory or it is not an affected or both.; sent9 -> int10: if that the rinse is not a savory and/or is not a kind of an affected hold it subvocalizes.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__