that the dissembling declinometer does not occur is true if the ambassadorship happens.
sent1: the organizing petrissage does not occur and/or the procession happens. sent2: the poke does not occur if the tripping scaremonger does not occur. sent3: the tripping scaremonger does not occur if the fact that the fact that the cytotoxicness does not occur and the ambassadorship does not occur is incorrect is correct. sent4: if the recessionariness does not occur the fact that the dissembling declinometer occurs but the procession does not occur does not hold. sent5: the non-cytotoxicness and the ambassadorship happens. sent6: if the fact that the cytotoxicness does not occur and the ambassadorship occurs does not hold the tripping scaremonger does not occur. sent7: that the ambassadorship does not occur and the tripping scaremonger occurs is not right if the organizing petrissage occurs. sent8: the fact that the cytotoxicness happens and the ambassadorship does not occur does not hold. sent9: the fact that the organizing practicability does not occur is correct if that not the ambassadorship but the tripping scaremonger occurs does not hold. sent10: the recessionariness does not occur. sent11: that the organizing petrissage does not occur or that the procession does not occur or both is triggered by that the poking does not occur. sent12: the cytotoxicness does not occur and the curatorship does not occur if the poke occurs. sent13: if the organizing petrissage does not occur or the procession does not occur or both then the dissembling declinometer does not occur. sent14: the fantasizing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ambassadorship happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the cytotoxicness does not occur and the ambassadorship does not occur hold.; assump2 -> int1: the ambassadorship does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the cytotoxicness does not occur and the ambassadorship does not occur does not hold.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the tripping scaremonger does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the poke does not occur.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the organizing petrissage does not occur and/or the procession does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the dissembling declinometer does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the organizing practicability does not occur and the curatorship does not occur.
sent4 & sent10 -> int8: that the dissembling declinometer but not the procession happens is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the dissembling declinometer does not occur is true if the ambassadorship happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the organizing petrissage does not occur and/or the procession happens. sent2: the poke does not occur if the tripping scaremonger does not occur. sent3: the tripping scaremonger does not occur if the fact that the fact that the cytotoxicness does not occur and the ambassadorship does not occur is incorrect is correct. sent4: if the recessionariness does not occur the fact that the dissembling declinometer occurs but the procession does not occur does not hold. sent5: the non-cytotoxicness and the ambassadorship happens. sent6: if the fact that the cytotoxicness does not occur and the ambassadorship occurs does not hold the tripping scaremonger does not occur. sent7: that the ambassadorship does not occur and the tripping scaremonger occurs is not right if the organizing petrissage occurs. sent8: the fact that the cytotoxicness happens and the ambassadorship does not occur does not hold. sent9: the fact that the organizing practicability does not occur is correct if that not the ambassadorship but the tripping scaremonger occurs does not hold. sent10: the recessionariness does not occur. sent11: that the organizing petrissage does not occur or that the procession does not occur or both is triggered by that the poking does not occur. sent12: the cytotoxicness does not occur and the curatorship does not occur if the poke occurs. sent13: if the organizing petrissage does not occur or the procession does not occur or both then the dissembling declinometer does not occur. sent14: the fantasizing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ambassadorship happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the cytotoxicness does not occur and the ambassadorship does not occur hold.; assump2 -> int1: the ambassadorship does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the cytotoxicness does not occur and the ambassadorship does not occur does not hold.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the tripping scaremonger does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the poke does not occur.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the organizing petrissage does not occur and/or the procession does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the dissembling declinometer does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__