the fact that the anagogicness happens if the fact that the pausing occurs is not false is not right.
sent1: the fact that both the foreness and the dumpiness happens is not true if the pause does not occur. sent2: that the legislativeness does not occur is prevented by that the insinuation but not the parlay occurs. sent3: the foreness does not occur if that that the foreness happens and the dumpiness happens is incorrect hold. sent4: the fact that the bender does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the cerebrospinalness occurs if the bender happens. sent6: the reassurance does not occur if either the murmuring or the slinking or both occurs. sent7: the indiscretion happens but the mumbling does not occur if the fact that the legislativeness occurs is correct. sent8: the dumpiness is prevented by the foreness. sent9: if the shading does not occur that both the anagogicness and the improvisation happens is not true. sent10: if the fact that the anagogicness happens and the improvisation occurs is not right then the anagogicness does not occur. sent11: if the Levantine happens then the fact that the potentness does not occur hold. sent12: the firestorm happens. sent13: the fearing aquaculture but not the repairing meaningfulness happens. sent14: that either the inanimateness occurs or the foreness happens or both causes the non-dumpiness. sent15: the anagogicness occurs if both the pausing and the non-dumpyness occurs. sent16: if the repairing embryology occurs then that the nonexemptness does not occur hold. sent17: the inanimateness happens. sent18: if the resorting happens then the insinuation but not the parlay occurs. sent19: that the repairing myoglobin occurs or that the driftage does not occur or both is triggered by that the mumbling does not occur.
sent17 -> int1: either the inanimateness or the foreness or both occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the dumpiness does not occur is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pausing occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the pause and the non-dumpyness occurs.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the anagogicness happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the telemark occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the anagogicness happens if the fact that the pausing occurs is not false is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the foreness and the dumpiness happens is not true if the pause does not occur. sent2: that the legislativeness does not occur is prevented by that the insinuation but not the parlay occurs. sent3: the foreness does not occur if that that the foreness happens and the dumpiness happens is incorrect hold. sent4: the fact that the bender does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the cerebrospinalness occurs if the bender happens. sent6: the reassurance does not occur if either the murmuring or the slinking or both occurs. sent7: the indiscretion happens but the mumbling does not occur if the fact that the legislativeness occurs is correct. sent8: the dumpiness is prevented by the foreness. sent9: if the shading does not occur that both the anagogicness and the improvisation happens is not true. sent10: if the fact that the anagogicness happens and the improvisation occurs is not right then the anagogicness does not occur. sent11: if the Levantine happens then the fact that the potentness does not occur hold. sent12: the firestorm happens. sent13: the fearing aquaculture but not the repairing meaningfulness happens. sent14: that either the inanimateness occurs or the foreness happens or both causes the non-dumpiness. sent15: the anagogicness occurs if both the pausing and the non-dumpyness occurs. sent16: if the repairing embryology occurs then that the nonexemptness does not occur hold. sent17: the inanimateness happens. sent18: if the resorting happens then the insinuation but not the parlay occurs. sent19: that the repairing myoglobin occurs or that the driftage does not occur or both is triggered by that the mumbling does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: either the inanimateness or the foreness or both occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the dumpiness does not occur is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pausing occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the pause and the non-dumpyness occurs.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the anagogicness happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__