the bankrupt is decisive.
sent1: the bankrupt is decisive if the fact that the creatine is nonprescription thing that is not irremovable does not hold. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not nonprescription the creatine is not irremovable. sent3: the fact that the creatine is both nonprescription and irremovable is false. sent4: if the synergy is not irremovable the fact that the creatine is nonprescription but it is not irremovable is not right. sent5: if there is something such that it is not malignant the synergy is not irremovable. sent6: there exists something such that it is not malignant. sent7: the synergy is not decisive if there exists something such that it is not irremovable.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the synergy is not irremovable.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the creatine is a kind of nonprescription thing that is not irremovable is incorrect.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bankrupt is decisive. ; $context$ = sent1: the bankrupt is decisive if the fact that the creatine is nonprescription thing that is not irremovable does not hold. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not nonprescription the creatine is not irremovable. sent3: the fact that the creatine is both nonprescription and irremovable is false. sent4: if the synergy is not irremovable the fact that the creatine is nonprescription but it is not irremovable is not right. sent5: if there is something such that it is not malignant the synergy is not irremovable. sent6: there exists something such that it is not malignant. sent7: the synergy is not decisive if there exists something such that it is not irremovable. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the synergy is not irremovable.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the creatine is a kind of nonprescription thing that is not irremovable is incorrect.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__