the rivaling Pyrrhus does not occur.
sent1: the hustling occurs and the commutating cinchonine occurs. sent2: the multiplying does not occur. sent3: the transactinide occurs. sent4: the fact that the rivaling Daubentoniidae does not occur and the apsidalness happens is incorrect. sent5: if the watercolor occurs then the commutating photomicrograph occurs. sent6: the transactinide happens if the rivaling heterospory does not occur. sent7: the Tonganness does not occur but the chaetalness occurs. sent8: the much happens. sent9: the fact that the loamlessness occurs hold. sent10: that the dockage happens is true. sent11: the diaphoretic does not occur. sent12: both the unawareness and the rivaling grip happens. sent13: if that the watercolor does not occur and the diaphoretic happens is wrong the commutating photomicrograph occurs. sent14: the by-product happens if the fact that not the shooting Verbenaceae but the chafing happens is wrong. sent15: the decapitation occurs and the hostility occurs. sent16: the Energy does not occur. sent17: that both the commutating photomicrograph and the hustling happens results in that the rivaling heterospory does not occur. sent18: the rivaling Pyrrhus does not occur if the watercolor and the diaphoretic occurs. sent19: the copout happens. sent20: the rivaling Pyrrhus happens and the transactinideness happens if the rivaling heterospory does not occur. sent21: if the harangue happens and the clamp happens then the shooting plaster does not occur. sent22: the fact that the rivaling whacked occurs is true. sent23: the commutating cinchonine occurs. sent24: if the fact that the non-awayness and the rivaling oblique happens is false then that the revocation happens is correct. sent25: the uncomfortableness and the pancreatectomy occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the watercolor does not occur but the diaphoretic occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the diaphoreticness occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the watercolor does not occur and the diaphoreticness happens is not true.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the commutating photomicrograph happens.; sent1 -> int5: the hustling happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the commutating photomicrograph and the hustling happens.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the rivaling heterospory does not occur.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: the rivaling Pyrrhus occurs and the transactinideness occurs.; int8 -> hypothesis;
that the rivaling Pyrrhus does not occur is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the rivaling Pyrrhus does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the hustling occurs and the commutating cinchonine occurs. sent2: the multiplying does not occur. sent3: the transactinide occurs. sent4: the fact that the rivaling Daubentoniidae does not occur and the apsidalness happens is incorrect. sent5: if the watercolor occurs then the commutating photomicrograph occurs. sent6: the transactinide happens if the rivaling heterospory does not occur. sent7: the Tonganness does not occur but the chaetalness occurs. sent8: the much happens. sent9: the fact that the loamlessness occurs hold. sent10: that the dockage happens is true. sent11: the diaphoretic does not occur. sent12: both the unawareness and the rivaling grip happens. sent13: if that the watercolor does not occur and the diaphoretic happens is wrong the commutating photomicrograph occurs. sent14: the by-product happens if the fact that not the shooting Verbenaceae but the chafing happens is wrong. sent15: the decapitation occurs and the hostility occurs. sent16: the Energy does not occur. sent17: that both the commutating photomicrograph and the hustling happens results in that the rivaling heterospory does not occur. sent18: the rivaling Pyrrhus does not occur if the watercolor and the diaphoretic occurs. sent19: the copout happens. sent20: the rivaling Pyrrhus happens and the transactinideness happens if the rivaling heterospory does not occur. sent21: if the harangue happens and the clamp happens then the shooting plaster does not occur. sent22: the fact that the rivaling whacked occurs is true. sent23: the commutating cinchonine occurs. sent24: if the fact that the non-awayness and the rivaling oblique happens is false then that the revocation happens is correct. sent25: the uncomfortableness and the pancreatectomy occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the watercolor does not occur but the diaphoretic occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the diaphoreticness occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the watercolor does not occur and the diaphoreticness happens is not true.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the commutating photomicrograph happens.; sent1 -> int5: the hustling happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the commutating photomicrograph and the hustling happens.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the rivaling heterospory does not occur.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: the rivaling Pyrrhus occurs and the transactinideness occurs.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__