the ludo does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the morphophonemicsness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the swattering does not occur if the swattering does not occur and/or the Eddy does not occur. sent3: the Eddy does not occur if the fact that the swattering happens and the trundling levy does not occur is not true. sent4: the fact that the protesting Valerianaceae does not occur is right. sent5: the voyeuristicness occurs. sent6: that the takeaway does not occur causes that both the non-morphophonemicsness and the non-hemisphericness happens. sent7: that both the swatter and the trundling levy occurs is wrong. sent8: that the bisontineness occurs hold. sent9: the ludo does not occur if the fact that both the protesting resilience and the mobile happens is incorrect. sent10: the rerunning disruption does not occur. sent11: the royalness does not occur and the anticlimax does not occur. sent12: if the Eddy does not occur then the takeaway does not occur. sent13: the fact that the embroidery occurs and the mistaking happens is incorrect if that the irritation does not occur is true. sent14: if that the acceptableness happens but the chasing does not occur is wrong then the protesting rambler does not occur. sent15: that the protesting resilience and the mobileness happens is not right if the hemisphericness does not occur. sent16: that the takeaway does not occur yields that the morphophonemicsness does not occur. sent17: the trundling levy occurs. sent18: the chlamydialness does not occur and the buzzing does not occur. sent19: that the mobileness does not occur prevents that the ludo happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the swattering occurs and the trundling levy does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the trundling levy does not occur.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the swatter happens but the trundling levy does not occur does not hold.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the Eddy does not occur.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the takeaway does not occur.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: both the non-morphophonemicsness and the non-hemisphericness occurs.; int6 -> int7: the hemisphericness does not occur.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: that the protesting resilience happens and the mobile happens is wrong.; sent9 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the ludo occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the ludo does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the morphophonemicsness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the swattering does not occur if the swattering does not occur and/or the Eddy does not occur. sent3: the Eddy does not occur if the fact that the swattering happens and the trundling levy does not occur is not true. sent4: the fact that the protesting Valerianaceae does not occur is right. sent5: the voyeuristicness occurs. sent6: that the takeaway does not occur causes that both the non-morphophonemicsness and the non-hemisphericness happens. sent7: that both the swatter and the trundling levy occurs is wrong. sent8: that the bisontineness occurs hold. sent9: the ludo does not occur if the fact that both the protesting resilience and the mobile happens is incorrect. sent10: the rerunning disruption does not occur. sent11: the royalness does not occur and the anticlimax does not occur. sent12: if the Eddy does not occur then the takeaway does not occur. sent13: the fact that the embroidery occurs and the mistaking happens is incorrect if that the irritation does not occur is true. sent14: if that the acceptableness happens but the chasing does not occur is wrong then the protesting rambler does not occur. sent15: that the protesting resilience and the mobileness happens is not right if the hemisphericness does not occur. sent16: that the takeaway does not occur yields that the morphophonemicsness does not occur. sent17: the trundling levy occurs. sent18: the chlamydialness does not occur and the buzzing does not occur. sent19: that the mobileness does not occur prevents that the ludo happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the swattering occurs and the trundling levy does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the trundling levy does not occur.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the swatter happens but the trundling levy does not occur does not hold.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the Eddy does not occur.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the takeaway does not occur.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: both the non-morphophonemicsness and the non-hemisphericness occurs.; int6 -> int7: the hemisphericness does not occur.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: that the protesting resilience happens and the mobile happens is wrong.; sent9 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__