the fact that that the potentiometer is non-unitary but it rackets is not right is not false.
sent1: something is not a kind of a detector if it is labyrinthine and it is a Frisbee. sent2: that if the sandalwood is a beachball the potentiometer does not irradiate curbstone and is non-catoptrics is not false. sent3: that the potentiometer is a kind of non-unitary thing that is catoptrics is incorrect if the accumulation is not a kind of a racket. sent4: the sandalwood is a beachball if the fact that it is not a ED and lexicalizes incantation is not true. sent5: the fact that the potentiometer is unitary and a racket is not correct. sent6: that the sandalwood is not a kind of a ED but it lexicalizes incantation is not true. sent7: that the potentiometer is both not unitary and a racket is not right if the accumulation is not catoptrics. sent8: that the potentiometer is unitary and it is a racket is false if the accumulation is not catoptrics. sent9: the fact that the accumulation is not a racket but catoptrics does not hold. sent10: the fact that the accumulation is not a kind of a racket but it is unitary does not hold if the fact that the potentiometer is not catoptrics hold. sent11: the fact that the accumulation is non-catoptrics thing that rackets does not hold. sent12: the accumulation is not catoptrics. sent13: if the potentiometer is not a kind of a racket then that the accumulation is not unitary but catoptrics is not true. sent14: if that something does not irradiate curbstone and it is not catoptrics is not false then it is not unitary. sent15: the fact that the potentiometer is both not a racket and nonradioactive is not true.
sent7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the potentiometer is not unitary but it is a racket.
sent14 -> int1: if the potentiometer does not irradiate curbstone and is not catoptrics it is not unitary.; sent4 & sent6 -> int2: the sandalwood is a beachball.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the potentiometer does not irradiate curbstone and it is not catoptrics.; int1 & int3 -> int4: the potentiometer is not unitary.; sent1 -> int5: the accumulation is not a detector if it is labyrinthine and it is a Frisbee.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the potentiometer is non-unitary but it rackets is not right is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a detector if it is labyrinthine and it is a Frisbee. sent2: that if the sandalwood is a beachball the potentiometer does not irradiate curbstone and is non-catoptrics is not false. sent3: that the potentiometer is a kind of non-unitary thing that is catoptrics is incorrect if the accumulation is not a kind of a racket. sent4: the sandalwood is a beachball if the fact that it is not a ED and lexicalizes incantation is not true. sent5: the fact that the potentiometer is unitary and a racket is not correct. sent6: that the sandalwood is not a kind of a ED but it lexicalizes incantation is not true. sent7: that the potentiometer is both not unitary and a racket is not right if the accumulation is not catoptrics. sent8: that the potentiometer is unitary and it is a racket is false if the accumulation is not catoptrics. sent9: the fact that the accumulation is not a racket but catoptrics does not hold. sent10: the fact that the accumulation is not a kind of a racket but it is unitary does not hold if the fact that the potentiometer is not catoptrics hold. sent11: the fact that the accumulation is non-catoptrics thing that rackets does not hold. sent12: the accumulation is not catoptrics. sent13: if the potentiometer is not a kind of a racket then that the accumulation is not unitary but catoptrics is not true. sent14: if that something does not irradiate curbstone and it is not catoptrics is not false then it is not unitary. sent15: the fact that the potentiometer is both not a racket and nonradioactive is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__