if the L-dopa manhandles fragmentation the fact that the internationalist is not a sailor or it is a dogleg or both does not hold.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it does not manhandle IIS is correct then that that the internationalist is not a sailor or is a dogleg or both is false hold. sent2: there is something such that it is a menstruum. sent3: something is a sailor and awes hypernymy. sent4: the L-dopa is an axon and it awes hypernymy. sent5: the internationalist cultures. sent6: the internationalist does manhandle fragmentation and is a sailor. sent7: if the fact that the L-dopa is a kind of a dishwater is not incorrect then the tabletop is a kind of an axon. sent8: the internationalist is not a dishwater if the fact that the tabletop manhandles IIS and/or is a sailor does not hold. sent9: the fact that the tabletop is not a sailor or pubic or both is false if the internationalist is not non-Ethiopian. sent10: the internationalist is not a Ethiopian if it is not a kind of a sailor. sent11: there exists something such that it is not unsympathetic. sent12: if the tabletop is not pubic that it is a kind of a Ethiopian and/or is a dishwater is not true. sent13: that the fragmentation manhandles IIS or it does awe hypernymy or both is not right if it is not a Ethiopian. sent14: the fragmentation does not manhandle IIS if that the tabletop is a kind of a Ethiopian and/or is a dishwater is incorrect. sent15: the fragmentation is not botryoid. sent16: the fact that the Clydesdale is not arthropodal hold. sent17: that either the fragmentation does manhandle updating or it is an axon or both is wrong. sent18: the tabletop is not an axon if there is something such that it is pubic and it manhandles IIS. sent19: something is not a Ethiopian. sent20: the L-dopa is pubic and it is an axon. sent21: something is a sailor and it does manhandle IIS. sent22: if the fact that either the tabletop is an axon or it manhandles fragmentation or both is wrong the L-dopa is not a kind of a Ethiopian. sent23: there exists something such that it is a kind of a dishwater.
sent4 -> int1: the L-dopa does awe hypernymy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the L-dopa does manhandle fragmentation.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the L-dopa does awe hypernymy and it does manhandle fragmentation.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it does awe hypernymy and manhandles fragmentation.;
$hypothesis$ = if the L-dopa manhandles fragmentation the fact that the internationalist is not a sailor or it is a dogleg or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it does not manhandle IIS is correct then that that the internationalist is not a sailor or is a dogleg or both is false hold. sent2: there is something such that it is a menstruum. sent3: something is a sailor and awes hypernymy. sent4: the L-dopa is an axon and it awes hypernymy. sent5: the internationalist cultures. sent6: the internationalist does manhandle fragmentation and is a sailor. sent7: if the fact that the L-dopa is a kind of a dishwater is not incorrect then the tabletop is a kind of an axon. sent8: the internationalist is not a dishwater if the fact that the tabletop manhandles IIS and/or is a sailor does not hold. sent9: the fact that the tabletop is not a sailor or pubic or both is false if the internationalist is not non-Ethiopian. sent10: the internationalist is not a Ethiopian if it is not a kind of a sailor. sent11: there exists something such that it is not unsympathetic. sent12: if the tabletop is not pubic that it is a kind of a Ethiopian and/or is a dishwater is not true. sent13: that the fragmentation manhandles IIS or it does awe hypernymy or both is not right if it is not a Ethiopian. sent14: the fragmentation does not manhandle IIS if that the tabletop is a kind of a Ethiopian and/or is a dishwater is incorrect. sent15: the fragmentation is not botryoid. sent16: the fact that the Clydesdale is not arthropodal hold. sent17: that either the fragmentation does manhandle updating or it is an axon or both is wrong. sent18: the tabletop is not an axon if there is something such that it is pubic and it manhandles IIS. sent19: something is not a Ethiopian. sent20: the L-dopa is pubic and it is an axon. sent21: something is a sailor and it does manhandle IIS. sent22: if the fact that either the tabletop is an axon or it manhandles fragmentation or both is wrong the L-dopa is not a kind of a Ethiopian. sent23: there exists something such that it is a kind of a dishwater. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the L-dopa does awe hypernymy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the L-dopa does manhandle fragmentation.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the L-dopa does awe hypernymy and it does manhandle fragmentation.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it does awe hypernymy and manhandles fragmentation.; __UNKNOWN__