the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane but it is a kind of a counterstain.
sent1: the saute is a kind of a counterstain if the tritheist is a kind of a vegetation. sent2: if the saute is a kind of a counterstain the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. sent3: if the fact that something is a tasting and it does dogmatize does not hold it is not diffident. sent4: the crenel is not diffident and it is not unnatural if that the sake is not diffident is not false. sent5: the crenel is not unnatural if the sake is not diffident. sent6: if the fact that the fact that the padrone is hexadecimal and unnatural is not false is false then it is not diffident. sent7: the tritheist is a vegetation if the fact that the crenel is a kind of non-diffident thing that is unnatural hold. sent8: the crenel is not unnatural. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Nazi and it does not snap. sent10: the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. sent11: the ortygan is hexadecimal. sent12: the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane but it is a counterstain if the fact that the saute is a counterstain is not incorrect. sent13: the sake is diffident and/or it dogmatizes. sent14: the fact that the tritheist is a vegetation hold if the crenel is non-diffident thing that is not unnatural. sent15: if the ortygan is a kind of a Nazi the saute is not a counterstain but it is a kind of a Nazi. sent16: that the sake is not diffident is right if it does not dogmatize. sent17: that something does not snap is not false. sent18: there is something such that it is not a Nazi. sent19: if the padrone is non-hexadecimal the fact that the sake does taste and it dogmatizes is wrong. sent20: if something that is not Nazi is not a snap the padrone is not hexadecimal. sent21: something is not diffident if the fact that it does not dogmatize is correct. sent22: there exists something such that it is not Nazi and it snaps. sent23: there exists something such that it is a kind of Nazi thing that does not snap. sent24: if the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane but it is a counterstain then the saute tastes.
sent9 & sent20 -> int1: the padrone is non-hexadecimal.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the sake does taste and it does dogmatize does not hold.; sent3 -> int3: if that the sake is a tasting and dogmatizes is false it is not diffident.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sake is not diffident.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the crenel is not diffident and is not unnatural.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the tritheist is a vegetation.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the saute is a counterstain.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane but it is a counterstain does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane but it is a kind of a counterstain. ; $context$ = sent1: the saute is a kind of a counterstain if the tritheist is a kind of a vegetation. sent2: if the saute is a kind of a counterstain the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. sent3: if the fact that something is a tasting and it does dogmatize does not hold it is not diffident. sent4: the crenel is not diffident and it is not unnatural if that the sake is not diffident is not false. sent5: the crenel is not unnatural if the sake is not diffident. sent6: if the fact that the fact that the padrone is hexadecimal and unnatural is not false is false then it is not diffident. sent7: the tritheist is a vegetation if the fact that the crenel is a kind of non-diffident thing that is unnatural hold. sent8: the crenel is not unnatural. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Nazi and it does not snap. sent10: the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. sent11: the ortygan is hexadecimal. sent12: the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane but it is a counterstain if the fact that the saute is a counterstain is not incorrect. sent13: the sake is diffident and/or it dogmatizes. sent14: the fact that the tritheist is a vegetation hold if the crenel is non-diffident thing that is not unnatural. sent15: if the ortygan is a kind of a Nazi the saute is not a counterstain but it is a kind of a Nazi. sent16: that the sake is not diffident is right if it does not dogmatize. sent17: that something does not snap is not false. sent18: there is something such that it is not a Nazi. sent19: if the padrone is non-hexadecimal the fact that the sake does taste and it dogmatizes is wrong. sent20: if something that is not Nazi is not a snap the padrone is not hexadecimal. sent21: something is not diffident if the fact that it does not dogmatize is correct. sent22: there exists something such that it is not Nazi and it snaps. sent23: there exists something such that it is a kind of Nazi thing that does not snap. sent24: if the ortygan does not chance dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane but it is a counterstain then the saute tastes. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent20 -> int1: the padrone is non-hexadecimal.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the sake does taste and it does dogmatize does not hold.; sent3 -> int3: if that the sake is a tasting and dogmatizes is false it is not diffident.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sake is not diffident.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the crenel is not diffident and is not unnatural.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the tritheist is a vegetation.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the saute is a counterstain.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__