the western does damp scrimshanker.
sent1: there exists something such that it does roll hobnail and/or it is a tilt. sent2: everything is not onomastics. sent3: if something is apocrine then it does damp scrimshanker. sent4: if something is a kind of a disagreeableness then it is angelic. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does not damp scrimshanker and is not Argentine is not right the simpleton is not apocrine. sent6: everything is unpaintable. sent7: if the western damps scrimshanker it is an epidemic. sent8: if something is a scission then the fact that it does not damp scrimshanker and is non-Argentine is not correct. sent9: if something is not onomastics then it is a scission and is not a kind of a preventive. sent10: if something is an epidemic the western is apocrine. sent11: if something is paintable thing that is non-epidemic then it is a verbiage.
sent6 -> int1: the THING-A is unpaintable.; int1 -> int2: the THING-A is an epidemic or it is unpaintable or both.; int2 -> int3: everything is an epidemic and/or it is unpaintable.; int3 -> int4: the simpleton is either epidemic or unpaintable or both.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is epidemic or it is unpaintable or both.; sent3 -> int6: if the western is apocrine it does damp scrimshanker.;
the bandstand is a verbiage.
sent2 -> int7: the waterbuck is not onomastics.; sent9 -> int8: if the waterbuck is not onomastics it is a kind of a scission and is not a preventive.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the waterbuck is a scission but it is not a preventive.; int9 -> int10: the waterbuck is a scission.; sent8 -> int11: if the fact that the waterbuck is a scission is not false that it does not damp scrimshanker and it is not Argentine is not right.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the waterbuck does not damp scrimshanker and it is not Argentine is not correct.; int12 -> int13: there exists nothing that does not damp scrimshanker and is not Argentine.; int13 -> int14: the fact that the western does not damp scrimshanker and is not Argentine is wrong.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it does not damp scrimshanker and it is not Argentine does not hold.; int15 & sent5 -> int16: the simpleton is not apocrine.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is not apocrine.; sent11 -> int18: the bandstand is a verbiage if it is not unpaintable and is not epidemic.;
$hypothesis$ = the western does damp scrimshanker. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does roll hobnail and/or it is a tilt. sent2: everything is not onomastics. sent3: if something is apocrine then it does damp scrimshanker. sent4: if something is a kind of a disagreeableness then it is angelic. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does not damp scrimshanker and is not Argentine is not right the simpleton is not apocrine. sent6: everything is unpaintable. sent7: if the western damps scrimshanker it is an epidemic. sent8: if something is a scission then the fact that it does not damp scrimshanker and is non-Argentine is not correct. sent9: if something is not onomastics then it is a scission and is not a kind of a preventive. sent10: if something is an epidemic the western is apocrine. sent11: if something is paintable thing that is non-epidemic then it is a verbiage. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the THING-A is unpaintable.; int1 -> int2: the THING-A is an epidemic or it is unpaintable or both.; int2 -> int3: everything is an epidemic and/or it is unpaintable.; int3 -> int4: the simpleton is either epidemic or unpaintable or both.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is epidemic or it is unpaintable or both.; sent3 -> int6: if the western is apocrine it does damp scrimshanker.; __UNKNOWN__