if the foreness happens the fact that the saccadicness does not occur or the adventuristicness does not occur or both is not correct.
sent1: if the adventuristicness does not occur the foreness happens. sent2: if that the bawling cymbal does not occur is correct then the coifing does not occur. sent3: the fact that the formalness happens is correct. sent4: that either the masking swerve does not occur or the plantalness does not occur or both does not hold. sent5: the healthiness does not occur if the choleraicness does not occur. sent6: if the foreness happens the non-saccadicness or the non-adventuristicness or both occurs. sent7: if the indulgence does not occur the masking carton does not occur. sent8: the fact that the non-Goetheanness and/or the non-monocarpicness happens does not hold. sent9: if the saccadicness does not occur then the foreness does not occur. sent10: that the workflow does not occur is correct. sent11: if the flashover occurs then that the vesicularness does not occur and/or the masking Alabaman does not occur is wrong. sent12: the foreness happens if the saccadicness does not occur. sent13: the Concord does not occur and/or the masking Trimorphodon does not occur. sent14: that that the bonanza does not occur or the bacteriolyticness does not occur or both is not incorrect is false. sent15: if the adventuristicness does not occur then the foreness does not occur. sent16: the renewableness does not occur if the rust does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-saccadicness or the non-adventuristicness or both happens.; assump1 & sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the foreness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the foreness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that either the saccadicness does not occur or the adventuristicness does not occur or both is not true.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the foreness happens the fact that the saccadicness does not occur or the adventuristicness does not occur or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the adventuristicness does not occur the foreness happens. sent2: if that the bawling cymbal does not occur is correct then the coifing does not occur. sent3: the fact that the formalness happens is correct. sent4: that either the masking swerve does not occur or the plantalness does not occur or both does not hold. sent5: the healthiness does not occur if the choleraicness does not occur. sent6: if the foreness happens the non-saccadicness or the non-adventuristicness or both occurs. sent7: if the indulgence does not occur the masking carton does not occur. sent8: the fact that the non-Goetheanness and/or the non-monocarpicness happens does not hold. sent9: if the saccadicness does not occur then the foreness does not occur. sent10: that the workflow does not occur is correct. sent11: if the flashover occurs then that the vesicularness does not occur and/or the masking Alabaman does not occur is wrong. sent12: the foreness happens if the saccadicness does not occur. sent13: the Concord does not occur and/or the masking Trimorphodon does not occur. sent14: that that the bonanza does not occur or the bacteriolyticness does not occur or both is not incorrect is false. sent15: if the adventuristicness does not occur then the foreness does not occur. sent16: the renewableness does not occur if the rust does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-saccadicness or the non-adventuristicness or both happens.; assump1 & sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the foreness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the foreness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that either the saccadicness does not occur or the adventuristicness does not occur or both is not true.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__