the fact that the metopion is a kind of a Thornton and it is a buna is not right.
sent1: the opopanax reciprocates polyfoam if it ladles. sent2: that the cornhusk is not a Thornton if there is something such that it is not decisive is not wrong. sent3: the goldmine is subtractive if the fog is subtractive. sent4: that the opopanax is decisive and it is a Thornton is not right. sent5: there exists something such that it reciprocates butylene and it is decisive. sent6: the opopanax does ladle. sent7: everything is not non-septic and/or is subtractive. sent8: the metopion is a Thornton if something that does not reciprocate butylene does reciprocate polyfoam. sent9: the opopanax does not reciprocate butylene if the goldmine does not reciprocate butylene and it is not a kind of a nomia. sent10: that the cornhusk is not decisive and/or drowses regency is incorrect if there is something such that it is a kind of a defeatist. sent11: if that the aquatics is not a no-brainer but it is succinic does not hold the Wakashan is a no-brainer. sent12: if something is a no-brainer then the LEM is a defeatist. sent13: that something does not reciprocate butylene and it is not a nomia is correct if it is subtractive. sent14: that something reciprocates polyfoam hold. sent15: that the opopanax does reciprocate butylene and is decisive is not true if there exists something such that it does not reciprocate polyfoam. sent16: if there is something such that that it reciprocates butylene and is decisive is false the cornhusk is not a Thornton. sent17: the metopion is a Thornton that does not reciprocate polyfoam if the opopanax does not reciprocate butylene. sent18: that the metopion is a Thornton and it is a kind of a buna is not right if the cornhusk is not a kind of a Thornton. sent19: there exists something such that it is not androgynous. sent20: that the aquatics is not a no-brainer but succinic is not correct.
the metopion is a Thornton and it is a buna.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the metopion is a kind of a Thornton and it is a buna is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the opopanax reciprocates polyfoam if it ladles. sent2: that the cornhusk is not a Thornton if there is something such that it is not decisive is not wrong. sent3: the goldmine is subtractive if the fog is subtractive. sent4: that the opopanax is decisive and it is a Thornton is not right. sent5: there exists something such that it reciprocates butylene and it is decisive. sent6: the opopanax does ladle. sent7: everything is not non-septic and/or is subtractive. sent8: the metopion is a Thornton if something that does not reciprocate butylene does reciprocate polyfoam. sent9: the opopanax does not reciprocate butylene if the goldmine does not reciprocate butylene and it is not a kind of a nomia. sent10: that the cornhusk is not decisive and/or drowses regency is incorrect if there is something such that it is a kind of a defeatist. sent11: if that the aquatics is not a no-brainer but it is succinic does not hold the Wakashan is a no-brainer. sent12: if something is a no-brainer then the LEM is a defeatist. sent13: that something does not reciprocate butylene and it is not a nomia is correct if it is subtractive. sent14: that something reciprocates polyfoam hold. sent15: that the opopanax does reciprocate butylene and is decisive is not true if there exists something such that it does not reciprocate polyfoam. sent16: if there is something such that that it reciprocates butylene and is decisive is false the cornhusk is not a Thornton. sent17: the metopion is a Thornton that does not reciprocate polyfoam if the opopanax does not reciprocate butylene. sent18: that the metopion is a Thornton and it is a kind of a buna is not right if the cornhusk is not a kind of a Thornton. sent19: there exists something such that it is not androgynous. sent20: that the aquatics is not a no-brainer but succinic is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__