the cheekpiece is not a kind of a fool.
sent1: the strophanthin does not pleach anarchy and is a kind of a quarantine if it is not an annum. sent2: something does not pleach anarchy if it is a reproduction and it is a fool. sent3: the fact that the cheekpiece does pleach dartboard if the cheekpiece does deem and is not a kind of a lilyturf is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the strophanthin is a quarantine hold. sent5: that the cheekpiece is not a reproduction but it does pleach dartboard does not hold if the strophanthin does not fool. sent6: if the strophanthin is not non-agrobiologic then the fact that it is not an annum is correct. sent7: that the strophanthin is not agrobiologic but it is algebraic does not hold. sent8: the dentifrice is both not a geophagy and a Chamaedaphne. sent9: if the cheekpiece pleaches dartboard it is a kind of a reproduction. sent10: if that something is not a reproduction but it does pleach dartboard is not right it is not true-false. sent11: if the spacesuit is not algebraic then the antilepton is both a quarantine and an annum. sent12: if there is something such that it is not true-false then the fact that the college is not biosystematic but true-false is incorrect. sent13: the strophanthin is not an annum if the fact that that it is both non-agrobiologic and not non-algebraic hold is false. sent14: if the antilepton is a quarantine or it pleaches anarchy or both then the strophanthin is not a fool. sent15: the spacesuit does not work novel if something is not a kind of a geophagy and is a Chamaedaphne. sent16: there is something such that it is non-algebraic. sent17: the fact that the strophanthin is a kind of agrobiologic thing that is algebraic does not hold. sent18: the cheekpiece pleaches dartboard if it does not deem and it is not a lilyturf. sent19: the cheekpiece pleaches anarchy if the strophanthin does not pleaches anarchy and quarantines. sent20: if something does not work novel the fact that it is a kind of agrobiologic thing that does not pleach bookcase does not hold. sent21: the fact that something is a reproduction and does not pleach dartboard is not true if it pleaches anarchy. sent22: the cheekpiece does not deem and is not a kind of a lilyturf. sent23: the cheekpiece does not deem. sent24: if the strophanthin is not an annum then it is a quarantine.
sent18 & sent22 -> int1: the cheekpiece pleaches dartboard.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the cheekpiece is a reproduction is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cheekpiece is a fool.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the cheekpiece is a kind of a reproduction and it does fool.; sent2 -> int4: if the cheekpiece is a kind of a reproduction and fools it does not pleach anarchy.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cheekpiece does not pleach anarchy.; sent13 & sent7 -> int6: the strophanthin is not an annum.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: that the strophanthin does not pleach anarchy but it quarantines hold.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the cheekpiece pleaches anarchy.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the college is not biosystematic and is true-false does not hold.
sent10 -> int10: if the fact that the cheekpiece is not a reproduction and pleaches dartboard is wrong then it is not true-false.; sent20 -> int11: if the spacesuit does not work novel then that the fact that it is agrobiologic and does not pleach bookcase is correct does not hold.; sent8 -> int12: something is not a geophagy but it is a Chamaedaphne.; int12 & sent15 -> int13: the spacesuit does not work novel.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the spacesuit is agrobiologic but it does not pleach bookcase is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the cheekpiece is not a kind of a fool. ; $context$ = sent1: the strophanthin does not pleach anarchy and is a kind of a quarantine if it is not an annum. sent2: something does not pleach anarchy if it is a reproduction and it is a fool. sent3: the fact that the cheekpiece does pleach dartboard if the cheekpiece does deem and is not a kind of a lilyturf is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the strophanthin is a quarantine hold. sent5: that the cheekpiece is not a reproduction but it does pleach dartboard does not hold if the strophanthin does not fool. sent6: if the strophanthin is not non-agrobiologic then the fact that it is not an annum is correct. sent7: that the strophanthin is not agrobiologic but it is algebraic does not hold. sent8: the dentifrice is both not a geophagy and a Chamaedaphne. sent9: if the cheekpiece pleaches dartboard it is a kind of a reproduction. sent10: if that something is not a reproduction but it does pleach dartboard is not right it is not true-false. sent11: if the spacesuit is not algebraic then the antilepton is both a quarantine and an annum. sent12: if there is something such that it is not true-false then the fact that the college is not biosystematic but true-false is incorrect. sent13: the strophanthin is not an annum if the fact that that it is both non-agrobiologic and not non-algebraic hold is false. sent14: if the antilepton is a quarantine or it pleaches anarchy or both then the strophanthin is not a fool. sent15: the spacesuit does not work novel if something is not a kind of a geophagy and is a Chamaedaphne. sent16: there is something such that it is non-algebraic. sent17: the fact that the strophanthin is a kind of agrobiologic thing that is algebraic does not hold. sent18: the cheekpiece pleaches dartboard if it does not deem and it is not a lilyturf. sent19: the cheekpiece pleaches anarchy if the strophanthin does not pleaches anarchy and quarantines. sent20: if something does not work novel the fact that it is a kind of agrobiologic thing that does not pleach bookcase does not hold. sent21: the fact that something is a reproduction and does not pleach dartboard is not true if it pleaches anarchy. sent22: the cheekpiece does not deem and is not a kind of a lilyturf. sent23: the cheekpiece does not deem. sent24: if the strophanthin is not an annum then it is a quarantine. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent22 -> int1: the cheekpiece pleaches dartboard.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the cheekpiece is a reproduction is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cheekpiece is a fool.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the cheekpiece is a kind of a reproduction and it does fool.; sent2 -> int4: if the cheekpiece is a kind of a reproduction and fools it does not pleach anarchy.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cheekpiece does not pleach anarchy.; sent13 & sent7 -> int6: the strophanthin is not an annum.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: that the strophanthin does not pleach anarchy but it quarantines hold.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the cheekpiece pleaches anarchy.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__