there is something such that it is horticultural and it is not non-sexual.
sent1: the fact that something does preserve aphelion hold if it does preserve courbaril. sent2: if the sassaby preserves courbaril it does preserve aphelion. sent3: the fact that the sassaby is a kind of perineal thing that preserves courbaril does not hold. sent4: if that something is perineal and does not preserve courbaril is incorrect it preserves aphelion. sent5: the sassaby is a copyhold if either it is not sexual or it does not preserve aphelion or both. sent6: that the stockinet does not blemish Carib and does stretch is false. sent7: if the sassaby does preserve aphelion then the stockinet is sexual. sent8: the fact that the stockinet is not a capitalization but it is a stretch is incorrect. sent9: if that something is joyous and does not abjure runch does not hold it does blemish disunity. sent10: the fact that the sassaby is perineal thing that does not preserve courbaril is not right if it is a kind of a capitalization. sent11: there is something such that it is horticultural. sent12: something that does blemish Carib is horticultural. sent13: if that the keel does not preserve aphelion and it does not blemish Carib is not right then the stockinet does not preserve aphelion. sent14: the colossus blemishes Carib. sent15: there are sexual things. sent16: that the stockinet does blemish Carib and it is a kind of a stretch does not hold. sent17: the sassaby is a capitalization. sent18: the molindone is sexual and carroty. sent19: something is a capitalization if that it is not sexual and it is not a kind of a capitalization is not correct. sent20: that the stockinet is sexual but it does not preserve aphelion is wrong. sent21: the fact that the keel does not preserve aphelion and does not blemish Carib is not right if the tramcar is horticultural. sent22: if the sassaby is a capitalization that it is perineal and it preserves courbaril is not right. sent23: if the fluorochrome is a stretch that the transmigrante is a kind of non-horticultural thing that is a kind of a dame is not correct. sent24: the sassaby is a capitalization if the stockinet preserves courbaril. sent25: the stockinet does blemish Carib if the fact that it does not blemish Carib and it stretches is not right.
sent4 -> int1: if that the fact that the sassaby is perineal thing that does not preserve courbaril is not correct is not wrong it preserves aphelion.; sent10 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the sassaby is perineal and does not preserve courbaril does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sassaby preserves aphelion.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the stockinet is not non-sexual.; sent12 -> int5: the stockinet is horticultural if it does blemish Carib.; sent25 & sent6 -> int6: the stockinet does blemish Carib.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the stockinet is horticultural.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the stockinet is not non-horticultural and not non-sexual.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the sassaby is a copyhold and it does blemish Carib.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is horticultural and it is not non-sexual. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does preserve aphelion hold if it does preserve courbaril. sent2: if the sassaby preserves courbaril it does preserve aphelion. sent3: the fact that the sassaby is a kind of perineal thing that preserves courbaril does not hold. sent4: if that something is perineal and does not preserve courbaril is incorrect it preserves aphelion. sent5: the sassaby is a copyhold if either it is not sexual or it does not preserve aphelion or both. sent6: that the stockinet does not blemish Carib and does stretch is false. sent7: if the sassaby does preserve aphelion then the stockinet is sexual. sent8: the fact that the stockinet is not a capitalization but it is a stretch is incorrect. sent9: if that something is joyous and does not abjure runch does not hold it does blemish disunity. sent10: the fact that the sassaby is perineal thing that does not preserve courbaril is not right if it is a kind of a capitalization. sent11: there is something such that it is horticultural. sent12: something that does blemish Carib is horticultural. sent13: if that the keel does not preserve aphelion and it does not blemish Carib is not right then the stockinet does not preserve aphelion. sent14: the colossus blemishes Carib. sent15: there are sexual things. sent16: that the stockinet does blemish Carib and it is a kind of a stretch does not hold. sent17: the sassaby is a capitalization. sent18: the molindone is sexual and carroty. sent19: something is a capitalization if that it is not sexual and it is not a kind of a capitalization is not correct. sent20: that the stockinet is sexual but it does not preserve aphelion is wrong. sent21: the fact that the keel does not preserve aphelion and does not blemish Carib is not right if the tramcar is horticultural. sent22: if the sassaby is a capitalization that it is perineal and it preserves courbaril is not right. sent23: if the fluorochrome is a stretch that the transmigrante is a kind of non-horticultural thing that is a kind of a dame is not correct. sent24: the sassaby is a capitalization if the stockinet preserves courbaril. sent25: the stockinet does blemish Carib if the fact that it does not blemish Carib and it stretches is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if that the fact that the sassaby is perineal thing that does not preserve courbaril is not correct is not wrong it preserves aphelion.; sent10 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the sassaby is perineal and does not preserve courbaril does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sassaby preserves aphelion.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the stockinet is not non-sexual.; sent12 -> int5: the stockinet is horticultural if it does blemish Carib.; sent25 & sent6 -> int6: the stockinet does blemish Carib.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the stockinet is horticultural.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the stockinet is not non-horticultural and not non-sexual.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__