the unreadiness triggers the abbreviating.
sent1: the frame occurs. sent2: the fact that the nonappearance occurs and the dwarfing Pushkin does not occur does not hold if the dwarfing dunk occurs. sent3: that the abatement occurs but the tailback does not occur is not true. sent4: if that both the non-romaicness and the unpredictableness occurs is incorrect then the Catalan happens. sent5: the fact that the absenteeism but not the dwarfing Amundsen occurs is incorrect. sent6: the dwarfing onyx causes that the conspicuousness happens. sent7: the fact that the abbreviating happens if the absenteeism happens is right. sent8: if the unreadiness occurs then the fact that the absenteeism does not occur and the dwarfing Amundsen does not occur is wrong. sent9: the machine-madeness occurs if the fact that both the non-innerness and the non-microelectronicsness happens does not hold. sent10: if the nonaccomplishment occurs the dwarfing rhymed occurs. sent11: that the interpreting happens results in the uplifting nalorphine. sent12: the maximization happens. sent13: the fact that the tomentoseness but not the courtship occurs is false. sent14: that the Chinaman does not occur and the spillage does not occur is false. sent15: the disfranchisement happens. sent16: that the absenteeism occurs and the dwarfing Amundsen does not occur is false if the unreadiness occurs. sent17: that the synthesizing occurs and the elastance does not occur does not hold. sent18: if the synthesizing happens then the driving occurs. sent19: the abbreviating occurs if that the absenteeism does not occur and the dwarfing Amundsen does not occur is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unreadiness happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the absenteeism does not occur and the dwarfing Amundsen does not occur does not hold.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: that the abbreviating happens is true.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the unreadiness triggers the abbreviating. ; $context$ = sent1: the frame occurs. sent2: the fact that the nonappearance occurs and the dwarfing Pushkin does not occur does not hold if the dwarfing dunk occurs. sent3: that the abatement occurs but the tailback does not occur is not true. sent4: if that both the non-romaicness and the unpredictableness occurs is incorrect then the Catalan happens. sent5: the fact that the absenteeism but not the dwarfing Amundsen occurs is incorrect. sent6: the dwarfing onyx causes that the conspicuousness happens. sent7: the fact that the abbreviating happens if the absenteeism happens is right. sent8: if the unreadiness occurs then the fact that the absenteeism does not occur and the dwarfing Amundsen does not occur is wrong. sent9: the machine-madeness occurs if the fact that both the non-innerness and the non-microelectronicsness happens does not hold. sent10: if the nonaccomplishment occurs the dwarfing rhymed occurs. sent11: that the interpreting happens results in the uplifting nalorphine. sent12: the maximization happens. sent13: the fact that the tomentoseness but not the courtship occurs is false. sent14: that the Chinaman does not occur and the spillage does not occur is false. sent15: the disfranchisement happens. sent16: that the absenteeism occurs and the dwarfing Amundsen does not occur is false if the unreadiness occurs. sent17: that the synthesizing occurs and the elastance does not occur does not hold. sent18: if the synthesizing happens then the driving occurs. sent19: the abbreviating occurs if that the absenteeism does not occur and the dwarfing Amundsen does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unreadiness happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the absenteeism does not occur and the dwarfing Amundsen does not occur does not hold.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: that the abbreviating happens is true.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__