that the headpin does not eventuate and is syncretic is not right.
sent1: if the halophyte is a Hume then the yawn is a Hume. sent2: if the ladylove is not voltaic but it is trigonometric then the yawn is not a Roswell. sent3: something is not a behest. sent4: the halophyte is a Hume. sent5: the ladylove is not voltaic and is trigonometric if there is something such that it is not a behest. sent6: if the yawn is not a Roswell but a Hume the headpin is not a barony. sent7: the fact that the headpin does not eventuate and is syncretic is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of a barony is true.
sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the ladylove is not voltaic but it is trigonometric.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the yawn is not a kind of a Roswell is right.; sent1 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the yawn is a Hume hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the yawn is not a Roswell and is a kind of a Hume.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the headpin is not a barony.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the headpin does not eventuate and is syncretic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the halophyte is a Hume then the yawn is a Hume. sent2: if the ladylove is not voltaic but it is trigonometric then the yawn is not a Roswell. sent3: something is not a behest. sent4: the halophyte is a Hume. sent5: the ladylove is not voltaic and is trigonometric if there is something such that it is not a behest. sent6: if the yawn is not a Roswell but a Hume the headpin is not a barony. sent7: the fact that the headpin does not eventuate and is syncretic is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of a barony is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the ladylove is not voltaic but it is trigonometric.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the yawn is not a kind of a Roswell is right.; sent1 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the yawn is a Hume hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the yawn is not a Roswell and is a kind of a Hume.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the headpin is not a barony.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__