the valuer is a toke but it is not a crotch.
sent1: if there is something such that it does not straighten then the histologist is a kind of a collimator. sent2: something does straighten if that it is a collimator and/or not a imperishability is false. sent3: the damsel is not a kind of a collimator. sent4: the valuer is a kind of a toke. sent5: the fact that something is not a imperishability is not incorrect if that it is unpopular or it is a ghatti or both is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a toke is not false. sent7: the histologist is not an antiseptic. sent8: that something is not a kind of a nectarine is not wrong if it is factorial and it is hymenopterous. sent9: there exists something such that it is a charter. sent10: if something is a crotch then it is a toke. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a refill. sent12: if the histologist is humoral it is a ghatti. sent13: the couscous is a ranter and it is a infarct. sent14: the hypo is a imperishability and is a guanine. sent15: the histologist is unpopular. sent16: something that is both unpopular and a perpendicular is not a kind of a crotch. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a toke. sent18: if the histologist is not a kind of an antiseptic it is humoral. sent19: the valuer is not a kind of a collimator. sent20: the valuer is unpopular if something that is a imperishability is a kind of a ghatti. sent21: the valuer is a kind of a infarct and it is a kind of a perpendicular. sent22: that the histologist is humoral is not wrong if it is a flamboyant. sent23: the valuer is a kind of a infarct. sent24: if the brattice is not a ghatti the fact that the histologist is a collimator or it is not a kind of a imperishability or both does not hold. sent25: if something is a kind of a collimator then it is a kind of a imperishability. sent26: something is a infarct and is a ghatti. sent27: something is a imperishability.
sent25 -> int1: the histologist is a kind of a imperishability if it is a collimator.; sent18 & sent7 -> int2: the histologist is humoral.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: that the histologist is a ghatti is right.; sent21 -> int4: the valuer is not non-perpendicular.; sent16 -> int5: if the valuer is not popular and is a perpendicular it is not a kind of a crotch.;
the histologist does straighten.
sent5 -> int6: the histologist is not a imperishability if that it is unpopular and/or it is a ghatti does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the valuer is a toke but it is not a crotch. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does not straighten then the histologist is a kind of a collimator. sent2: something does straighten if that it is a collimator and/or not a imperishability is false. sent3: the damsel is not a kind of a collimator. sent4: the valuer is a kind of a toke. sent5: the fact that something is not a imperishability is not incorrect if that it is unpopular or it is a ghatti or both is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a toke is not false. sent7: the histologist is not an antiseptic. sent8: that something is not a kind of a nectarine is not wrong if it is factorial and it is hymenopterous. sent9: there exists something such that it is a charter. sent10: if something is a crotch then it is a toke. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a refill. sent12: if the histologist is humoral it is a ghatti. sent13: the couscous is a ranter and it is a infarct. sent14: the hypo is a imperishability and is a guanine. sent15: the histologist is unpopular. sent16: something that is both unpopular and a perpendicular is not a kind of a crotch. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a toke. sent18: if the histologist is not a kind of an antiseptic it is humoral. sent19: the valuer is not a kind of a collimator. sent20: the valuer is unpopular if something that is a imperishability is a kind of a ghatti. sent21: the valuer is a kind of a infarct and it is a kind of a perpendicular. sent22: that the histologist is humoral is not wrong if it is a flamboyant. sent23: the valuer is a kind of a infarct. sent24: if the brattice is not a ghatti the fact that the histologist is a collimator or it is not a kind of a imperishability or both does not hold. sent25: if something is a kind of a collimator then it is a kind of a imperishability. sent26: something is a infarct and is a ghatti. sent27: something is a imperishability. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 -> int1: the histologist is a kind of a imperishability if it is a collimator.; sent18 & sent7 -> int2: the histologist is humoral.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: that the histologist is a ghatti is right.; sent21 -> int4: the valuer is not non-perpendicular.; sent16 -> int5: if the valuer is not popular and is a perpendicular it is not a kind of a crotch.; __UNKNOWN__