the fact that the commando is not an isle and elaborates wineberry is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that that it either is not extraterritorial or is a kind of a Semite or both is incorrect. sent2: the fact that that the commando does not enclose Yemeni and does elaborate wineberry does not hold is right. sent3: if the occlusion is not an isle then that the fact that the commando is not a kind of an isle and elaborates wineberry is right is not correct. sent4: that something is not a kind of a Gromyko and encloses exbibit is not right if that it does elaborate khimar is true. sent5: the mortgagee is not an apology and elaborates wineberry. sent6: there exists something such that that it is extraterritorial and/or it is not a Semite is incorrect. sent7: if the commando is not an apology the fact that it does elaborate khimar and does enclose Yemeni hold. sent8: that the Yemeni is not an apology is correct. sent9: something is not an isle but it elaborates wineberry if it is a Gromyko. sent10: if there exists something such that that either it is not extraterritorial or it is not Semite or both does not hold the mortgagee is impetiginous. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not extraterritorial or is not a Semite or both is right. sent12: that the XY is impetiginous and it is an apology is wrong. sent13: there is something such that it is a Gromyko. sent14: that the commando is an isle that elaborates wineberry is incorrect if the occlusion is not a kind of an isle. sent15: The fact that the exbibit does enclose XY is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the XY does enclose exbibit is not incorrect. sent17: the mortgagee is not an apology. sent18: if the mortgagee is impetiginous then it is not an apology. sent19: if something is not a Gromyko then it encloses Yemeni. sent20: if a Gromyko encloses exbibit the mortgagee does not elaborate khimar. sent21: something is not a kind of an apology if it is impetiginous. sent22: there is something such that it encloses exbibit. sent23: there is something such that it is extraterritorial. sent24: something is a Gromyko if the fact that it is not a Gromyko and does enclose exbibit is wrong. sent25: if the XY does enclose Yemeni the occlusion is not an isle. sent26: something is not a kind of an apology but it elaborates khimar if it is impetiginous. sent27: there is something such that it is Semite. sent28: the fact that the commando is an isle and it elaborates wineberry is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the XY is a kind of a Gromyko.; assump1 & sent16 -> int1: the XY is a kind of a Gromyko and it does enclose exbibit.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a Gromyko that encloses exbibit.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: that the mortgagee does not elaborate khimar is right.; sent26 -> int4: the mortgagee is not a kind of an apology but it elaborates khimar if it is impetiginous.; sent19 -> int5: if the XY is not a kind of a Gromyko the fact that that it does not enclose Yemeni hold is false.;
the commando is not an isle and does elaborate wineberry.
sent9 -> int6: if the commando is a Gromyko then it is not an isle and does elaborate wineberry.; sent24 -> int7: the commando is a Gromyko if the fact that it is not a Gromyko and does enclose exbibit is incorrect.; sent4 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the commando is not the Gromyko and encloses exbibit does not hold if that the commando elaborates khimar hold hold.; sent12 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is impetiginous and it is a kind of an apology is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the commando is not an isle and elaborates wineberry is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it either is not extraterritorial or is a kind of a Semite or both is incorrect. sent2: the fact that that the commando does not enclose Yemeni and does elaborate wineberry does not hold is right. sent3: if the occlusion is not an isle then that the fact that the commando is not a kind of an isle and elaborates wineberry is right is not correct. sent4: that something is not a kind of a Gromyko and encloses exbibit is not right if that it does elaborate khimar is true. sent5: the mortgagee is not an apology and elaborates wineberry. sent6: there exists something such that that it is extraterritorial and/or it is not a Semite is incorrect. sent7: if the commando is not an apology the fact that it does elaborate khimar and does enclose Yemeni hold. sent8: that the Yemeni is not an apology is correct. sent9: something is not an isle but it elaborates wineberry if it is a Gromyko. sent10: if there exists something such that that either it is not extraterritorial or it is not Semite or both does not hold the mortgagee is impetiginous. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not extraterritorial or is not a Semite or both is right. sent12: that the XY is impetiginous and it is an apology is wrong. sent13: there is something such that it is a Gromyko. sent14: that the commando is an isle that elaborates wineberry is incorrect if the occlusion is not a kind of an isle. sent15: The fact that the exbibit does enclose XY is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the XY does enclose exbibit is not incorrect. sent17: the mortgagee is not an apology. sent18: if the mortgagee is impetiginous then it is not an apology. sent19: if something is not a Gromyko then it encloses Yemeni. sent20: if a Gromyko encloses exbibit the mortgagee does not elaborate khimar. sent21: something is not a kind of an apology if it is impetiginous. sent22: there is something such that it encloses exbibit. sent23: there is something such that it is extraterritorial. sent24: something is a Gromyko if the fact that it is not a Gromyko and does enclose exbibit is wrong. sent25: if the XY does enclose Yemeni the occlusion is not an isle. sent26: something is not a kind of an apology but it elaborates khimar if it is impetiginous. sent27: there is something such that it is Semite. sent28: the fact that the commando is an isle and it elaborates wineberry is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the XY is a kind of a Gromyko.; assump1 & sent16 -> int1: the XY is a kind of a Gromyko and it does enclose exbibit.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a Gromyko that encloses exbibit.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: that the mortgagee does not elaborate khimar is right.; sent26 -> int4: the mortgagee is not a kind of an apology but it elaborates khimar if it is impetiginous.; sent19 -> int5: if the XY is not a kind of a Gromyko the fact that that it does not enclose Yemeni hold is false.; __UNKNOWN__