the limiter is not a kind of a lees.
sent1: the troll is viricidal if the kitty is inattentive and is not anisogametic. sent2: if something is a kind of a cholesterol then it does not insinuate. sent3: if something is viricidal it is nontraditional or it is not acquisitive or both. sent4: the adjustment does not magnetize wildness if the lithium does not insinuate. sent5: the troll is not macromolecular. sent6: if something is a kind of a lover then it is a lees. sent7: the guarantor is not a ankus and/or it does not gravitate. sent8: that something is a lover or it is macromolecular or both is not true if it is not grateful. sent9: if the fact that something does criticize limiter but it is not a lover is not true it does not criticize limiter. sent10: the kitty does not criticize limiter and does not ulcerate if the troll is not macromolecular. sent11: if the kitty does not criticize limiter and does ulcerate then the limiter is a lover. sent12: the fact that something is a kind of a cholesterol and does not bow sarcosine is wrong if it does not gravitate. sent13: the limiter is a lover if the kitty does not criticize limiter and does not ulcerate. sent14: the limiter is a lover if the kitty does criticize limiter but it does not ulcerate. sent15: the kitty is a lees. sent16: the kitty is both inattentive and not anisogametic if the adjustment does not magnetize wildness. sent17: the kitty is not a kind of a lover and does not criticize limiter if the limiter is not macromolecular. sent18: the surety does not gravitate if something is not a ankus or it does not gravitate or both. sent19: something is not a lees if the fact that it is a lover or it is macromolecular or both is not right. sent20: the lithium is a cholesterol if that the surety is a cholesterol but it does not bow sarcosine is false.
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the kitty does not criticize limiter and does not ulcerate.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the limiter is a lover.; sent6 -> int3: if the limiter is a lover the fact that it is a kind of a lees is true.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the limiter is not a kind of a lees is not wrong.
sent19 -> int4: if the fact that the limiter is a kind of a lover or is macromolecular or both does not hold it is not a kind of a lees.; sent8 -> int5: if the limiter is not grateful then that it is a kind of a lover and/or it is not non-macromolecular is false.; sent3 -> int6: either the troll is nontraditional or it is not acquisitive or both if it is viricidal.; sent2 -> int7: the lithium does not insinuate if it is a cholesterol.; sent12 -> int8: that the surety is a cholesterol that does not bow sarcosine is not true if it does not gravitate.; sent7 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a ankus and/or does not gravitate is not wrong.; int9 & sent18 -> int10: the surety does not gravitate.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the surety is a cholesterol but it does not bow sarcosine is not correct.; sent20 & int11 -> int12: the lithium is a cholesterol.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the lithium does not insinuate.; sent4 & int13 -> int14: the adjustment does not magnetize wildness.; sent16 & int14 -> int15: the kitty is inattentive but it is not anisogametic.; sent1 & int15 -> int16: the troll is viricidal.; int6 & int16 -> int17: the troll is nontraditional and/or it is not acquisitive.; int17 -> int18: something is nontraditional and/or it is not acquisitive.;
$hypothesis$ = the limiter is not a kind of a lees. ; $context$ = sent1: the troll is viricidal if the kitty is inattentive and is not anisogametic. sent2: if something is a kind of a cholesterol then it does not insinuate. sent3: if something is viricidal it is nontraditional or it is not acquisitive or both. sent4: the adjustment does not magnetize wildness if the lithium does not insinuate. sent5: the troll is not macromolecular. sent6: if something is a kind of a lover then it is a lees. sent7: the guarantor is not a ankus and/or it does not gravitate. sent8: that something is a lover or it is macromolecular or both is not true if it is not grateful. sent9: if the fact that something does criticize limiter but it is not a lover is not true it does not criticize limiter. sent10: the kitty does not criticize limiter and does not ulcerate if the troll is not macromolecular. sent11: if the kitty does not criticize limiter and does ulcerate then the limiter is a lover. sent12: the fact that something is a kind of a cholesterol and does not bow sarcosine is wrong if it does not gravitate. sent13: the limiter is a lover if the kitty does not criticize limiter and does not ulcerate. sent14: the limiter is a lover if the kitty does criticize limiter but it does not ulcerate. sent15: the kitty is a lees. sent16: the kitty is both inattentive and not anisogametic if the adjustment does not magnetize wildness. sent17: the kitty is not a kind of a lover and does not criticize limiter if the limiter is not macromolecular. sent18: the surety does not gravitate if something is not a ankus or it does not gravitate or both. sent19: something is not a lees if the fact that it is a lover or it is macromolecular or both is not right. sent20: the lithium is a cholesterol if that the surety is a cholesterol but it does not bow sarcosine is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the kitty does not criticize limiter and does not ulcerate.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the limiter is a lover.; sent6 -> int3: if the limiter is a lover the fact that it is a kind of a lees is true.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__