that if the citifying does not occur then both the faithful and the calycealness happens is not right.
sent1: that the unsealing romanticism does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the faithful happens and the jam happens. sent3: the interpellation happens if the non-preprandialness and the non-calycealness occurs. sent4: the bankrupting Sorensen happens. sent5: the preprandialness does not occur. sent6: the stunting salutation happens. sent7: if the interpellation occurs then the citifying happens. sent8: the fact that the ruff happens is not false. sent9: the unrentableness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calycealness does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the preprandialness does not occur and the calycealness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the interpellation happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the citifying happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the citifying does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the calycealness occurs.; sent2 -> int6: the faithful occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the faithful occurs and the calycealness occurs.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the citifying does not occur then both the faithful and the calycealness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the unsealing romanticism does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the faithful happens and the jam happens. sent3: the interpellation happens if the non-preprandialness and the non-calycealness occurs. sent4: the bankrupting Sorensen happens. sent5: the preprandialness does not occur. sent6: the stunting salutation happens. sent7: if the interpellation occurs then the citifying happens. sent8: the fact that the ruff happens is not false. sent9: the unrentableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calycealness does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the preprandialness does not occur and the calycealness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the interpellation happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the citifying happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the citifying does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the calycealness occurs.; sent2 -> int6: the faithful occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the faithful occurs and the calycealness occurs.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__