the respiratoriness happens if the qualitativeness happens.
sent1: the rolling misdemeanor happens. sent2: the gingivalness occurs. sent3: the disservice occurs. sent4: the fact that the frontalness does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the trichroism happens is correct. sent6: that that the cambering liquor does not occur is caused by that the knitting and the rolling postdoc happens is not incorrect. sent7: the trucking migraine does not occur. sent8: the vaccination occurs. sent9: if the gingivalness does not occur then the cambering claim occurs and the qualitativeness occurs. sent10: if the trucking rupture does not occur then the respiratoriness happens. sent11: if the unreadiness and the divisionalness occurs the relaxing does not occur. sent12: if the rolling usance happens and the fidget occurs that the cambering foredge does not occur is not wrong. sent13: that both the isotopicness and the bastardization happens is not incorrect. sent14: if the trucking Comatulidae does not occur then the fact that the saprophyticness happens is true. sent15: the fact that the cambering Archilochus and the acroscopicness occurs is true. sent16: the trucking globe triggers that the trucking patch occurs. sent17: that the unresentfulness does not occur prevents that the fidgeting does not occur. sent18: the trucking Apache happens. sent19: if the qualitativeness and the gingivalness occurs then the trucking rupture does not occur. sent20: that the rolling reversal occurs hold. sent21: the agribusiness happens if the using does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the qualitativeness occurs.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the qualitativeness and the gingivalness occurs.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the trucking rupture does not occur.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the respiratoriness occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the cambering claim happens.
$hypothesis$ = the respiratoriness happens if the qualitativeness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the rolling misdemeanor happens. sent2: the gingivalness occurs. sent3: the disservice occurs. sent4: the fact that the frontalness does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the trichroism happens is correct. sent6: that that the cambering liquor does not occur is caused by that the knitting and the rolling postdoc happens is not incorrect. sent7: the trucking migraine does not occur. sent8: the vaccination occurs. sent9: if the gingivalness does not occur then the cambering claim occurs and the qualitativeness occurs. sent10: if the trucking rupture does not occur then the respiratoriness happens. sent11: if the unreadiness and the divisionalness occurs the relaxing does not occur. sent12: if the rolling usance happens and the fidget occurs that the cambering foredge does not occur is not wrong. sent13: that both the isotopicness and the bastardization happens is not incorrect. sent14: if the trucking Comatulidae does not occur then the fact that the saprophyticness happens is true. sent15: the fact that the cambering Archilochus and the acroscopicness occurs is true. sent16: the trucking globe triggers that the trucking patch occurs. sent17: that the unresentfulness does not occur prevents that the fidgeting does not occur. sent18: the trucking Apache happens. sent19: if the qualitativeness and the gingivalness occurs then the trucking rupture does not occur. sent20: that the rolling reversal occurs hold. sent21: the agribusiness happens if the using does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the qualitativeness occurs.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the qualitativeness and the gingivalness occurs.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the trucking rupture does not occur.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the respiratoriness occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__