the still does vacate lupus if the stressor is a nightingale.
sent1: the still does laicize verst. sent2: if the stressor is a kind of a interpenetration it is a Spinus. sent3: the stressor is both a nightingale and not a interpenetration. sent4: the stressor is a Spinus if that it is a nightingale and it is not a interpenetration is false. sent5: if the fact that the stressor is not a nightingale and is not a interpenetration is not correct it is a Spinus. sent6: if something is not a kind of a interpenetration and it is not a nightingale it is not a Spinus. sent7: if that the still is a nightingale is not false then the stressor vacates lupus. sent8: the stressor does not laicize stage. sent9: the stressor is not a interpenetration if the fact that it is a kind of a Spinus that is not serious is incorrect. sent10: the still is not a nightingale. sent11: the stressor is intrapulmonary and it is actable if the still is not cousinly. sent12: the cloverleaf is a nightingale. sent13: that the stressor is not a nightingale but a interpenetration does not hold. sent14: if something is intrapulmonary then the fact that it is a Spinus and it is not serious does not hold. sent15: the Walker is a nightingale. sent16: the stressor is a Spinus if it is not a nightingale and is not a interpenetration. sent17: the stressor is not a interpenetration. sent18: the fact that the sweater is not a reminiscence and not a nightingale is wrong. sent19: that something does not fling and it does not vacate lupus is wrong if it is a nightingale.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stressor is a nightingale.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stressor is not a kind of a nightingale and is not a kind of a interpenetration.; assump2 -> int1: the stressor is not a nightingale.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the stressor is not a nightingale and not a interpenetration is wrong.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the stressor is a Spinus.;
the fact that the sojourner does not fling and it does not vacate lupus does not hold.
sent19 -> int5: if the sojourner is a nightingale the fact that it is not a kind of a fling and it does not vacate lupus does not hold.; sent14 -> int6: if the stressor is intrapulmonary then the fact that it is a Spinus and it is not serious is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the still does vacate lupus if the stressor is a nightingale. ; $context$ = sent1: the still does laicize verst. sent2: if the stressor is a kind of a interpenetration it is a Spinus. sent3: the stressor is both a nightingale and not a interpenetration. sent4: the stressor is a Spinus if that it is a nightingale and it is not a interpenetration is false. sent5: if the fact that the stressor is not a nightingale and is not a interpenetration is not correct it is a Spinus. sent6: if something is not a kind of a interpenetration and it is not a nightingale it is not a Spinus. sent7: if that the still is a nightingale is not false then the stressor vacates lupus. sent8: the stressor does not laicize stage. sent9: the stressor is not a interpenetration if the fact that it is a kind of a Spinus that is not serious is incorrect. sent10: the still is not a nightingale. sent11: the stressor is intrapulmonary and it is actable if the still is not cousinly. sent12: the cloverleaf is a nightingale. sent13: that the stressor is not a nightingale but a interpenetration does not hold. sent14: if something is intrapulmonary then the fact that it is a Spinus and it is not serious does not hold. sent15: the Walker is a nightingale. sent16: the stressor is a Spinus if it is not a nightingale and is not a interpenetration. sent17: the stressor is not a interpenetration. sent18: the fact that the sweater is not a reminiscence and not a nightingale is wrong. sent19: that something does not fling and it does not vacate lupus is wrong if it is a nightingale. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stressor is a nightingale.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stressor is not a kind of a nightingale and is not a kind of a interpenetration.; assump2 -> int1: the stressor is not a nightingale.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the stressor is not a nightingale and not a interpenetration is wrong.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the stressor is a Spinus.; __UNKNOWN__