that the Baptists is not a ration hold.
sent1: if the honeypot is not a flathead then it is not somatosensory and does not drink Tamus. sent2: something is a sou'-sou'-east if the fact that it is not a sou'-sou'-east and is a communization is wrong. sent3: the Baptists does not ration if there is something such that that it is a ration that is a kind of a sou'-sou'-east is incorrect. sent4: the Baptists rations if the honeypot is a flathead. sent5: there is nothing such that it is not a sou'-sou'-east and it is a communization. sent6: the fact that the soloist is a kind of a sou'-sou'-east that is a communization is not right. sent7: the Baptists does not drink Tamus. sent8: the honeypot is not somatosensory. sent9: something drinks Tamus if the fact that it does not drinks Tamus and it is a sou'-sou'-east is wrong. sent10: there is something such that it warms Spalacidae. sent11: if the honeypot is not somatosensory and it does not drink Tamus the soloist is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-east. sent12: if that the honeypot is somatosensory but it does not drink Tamus is correct then the soloist is not a sou'-sou'-east. sent13: if the honeypot is not a kind of a flathead it is not somatosensory. sent14: there exists nothing that is a kind of a sou'-sou'-east and is a communization.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the honeypot is not a flathead.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the honeypot is not somatosensory and it does not drink Tamus.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the soloist is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-east.; sent2 -> int3: if that the soloist is not a sou'-sou'-east and is a communization does not hold it is a sou'-sou'-east.; sent5 -> int4: that the soloist is not a sou'-sou'-east but it is a communization is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the soloist is a sou'-sou'-east.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the honeypot is a flathead.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the Baptists is not a kind of a communization.
$hypothesis$ = that the Baptists is not a ration hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the honeypot is not a flathead then it is not somatosensory and does not drink Tamus. sent2: something is a sou'-sou'-east if the fact that it is not a sou'-sou'-east and is a communization is wrong. sent3: the Baptists does not ration if there is something such that that it is a ration that is a kind of a sou'-sou'-east is incorrect. sent4: the Baptists rations if the honeypot is a flathead. sent5: there is nothing such that it is not a sou'-sou'-east and it is a communization. sent6: the fact that the soloist is a kind of a sou'-sou'-east that is a communization is not right. sent7: the Baptists does not drink Tamus. sent8: the honeypot is not somatosensory. sent9: something drinks Tamus if the fact that it does not drinks Tamus and it is a sou'-sou'-east is wrong. sent10: there is something such that it warms Spalacidae. sent11: if the honeypot is not somatosensory and it does not drink Tamus the soloist is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-east. sent12: if that the honeypot is somatosensory but it does not drink Tamus is correct then the soloist is not a sou'-sou'-east. sent13: if the honeypot is not a kind of a flathead it is not somatosensory. sent14: there exists nothing that is a kind of a sou'-sou'-east and is a communization. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the honeypot is not a flathead.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the honeypot is not somatosensory and it does not drink Tamus.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the soloist is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-east.; sent2 -> int3: if that the soloist is not a sou'-sou'-east and is a communization does not hold it is a sou'-sou'-east.; sent5 -> int4: that the soloist is not a sou'-sou'-east but it is a communization is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the soloist is a sou'-sou'-east.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the honeypot is a flathead.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__