the fact that the fact that that the defraying dazed does not occur but the rinse happens hold is not true if the defraying industry does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: that the defraying Sacco does not occur is prevented by that the properness occurs. sent2: the non-unreliableness results in that not the defraying dazed but the rinse occurs. sent3: if the unreliableness does not occur then the fact that that not the defraying dazed but the rinse happens is not false is wrong. sent4: the mnemonicsness occurs. sent5: if the unreliableness does not occur the fact that the defraying dazed occurs and the rinse occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the defraying industry does not occur the fact that the defraying dazed happens and the rinse happens is not right. sent7: the Byzantineness occurs but the philatelicness does not occur. sent8: not the defraying dazed but the rinsing occurs if the fact that the defraying industry does not occur is correct. sent9: if the Byzantineness happens and the philatelicness occurs then the fact that the generousness happens is not wrong. sent10: if the culmination does not occur then that the plunk does not occur and the place happens does not hold. sent11: the high-tensionness happens. sent12: the defraying dazed does not occur but the rinse happens. sent13: that the defraying dazed happens and the rinsing happens does not hold. sent14: the philatelicness does not occur. sent15: if the rinsing does not occur then that the defraying industry does not occur but the generousness happens is wrong. sent16: the non-generousness is prevented by that both the Byzantineness and the non-philatelicness occurs. sent17: the fact that the generousness does not occur hold if the contortion but not the defraying industry occurs. sent18: if the unreliableness happens that the contortion does not occur is incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unreliableness occurs.; sent18 & assump2 -> int1: the contortion occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the defraying industry does not occur is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the contortion happens and the defraying industry does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the generousness does not occur.; sent16 & sent7 -> int4: the generousness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the unreliableness does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: that that not the defraying dazed but the rinsing occurs is false is correct.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the grammaticalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that that the defraying dazed does not occur but the rinse happens hold is not true if the defraying industry does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the defraying Sacco does not occur is prevented by that the properness occurs. sent2: the non-unreliableness results in that not the defraying dazed but the rinse occurs. sent3: if the unreliableness does not occur then the fact that that not the defraying dazed but the rinse happens is not false is wrong. sent4: the mnemonicsness occurs. sent5: if the unreliableness does not occur the fact that the defraying dazed occurs and the rinse occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the defraying industry does not occur the fact that the defraying dazed happens and the rinse happens is not right. sent7: the Byzantineness occurs but the philatelicness does not occur. sent8: not the defraying dazed but the rinsing occurs if the fact that the defraying industry does not occur is correct. sent9: if the Byzantineness happens and the philatelicness occurs then the fact that the generousness happens is not wrong. sent10: if the culmination does not occur then that the plunk does not occur and the place happens does not hold. sent11: the high-tensionness happens. sent12: the defraying dazed does not occur but the rinse happens. sent13: that the defraying dazed happens and the rinsing happens does not hold. sent14: the philatelicness does not occur. sent15: if the rinsing does not occur then that the defraying industry does not occur but the generousness happens is wrong. sent16: the non-generousness is prevented by that both the Byzantineness and the non-philatelicness occurs. sent17: the fact that the generousness does not occur hold if the contortion but not the defraying industry occurs. sent18: if the unreliableness happens that the contortion does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unreliableness occurs.; sent18 & assump2 -> int1: the contortion occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the defraying industry does not occur is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the contortion happens and the defraying industry does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the generousness does not occur.; sent16 & sent7 -> int4: the generousness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the unreliableness does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: that that not the defraying dazed but the rinsing occurs is false is correct.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__