the fact that there exists something such that it is incendiary and it is a fipple does not hold.
sent1: something is not cardinal if that it is a kind of a cardinal and it housekeeps defiance is false. sent2: the tutee is not a worse if there is something such that it is non-cardinal and trustful. sent3: everything does not recite. sent4: that the fuck is a kind of an incendiary is right. sent5: everything is trustful and taciturn. sent6: the fuck is a fipple. sent7: the anchorite is incendiary if the fuck is a fipple. sent8: if the fuck is a kind of a niece the anchorite is a kind of an incendiary. sent9: if something does not recite that it is a cardinal and it does housekeep defiance is not correct. sent10: the fuck is a kind of a fipple and/or it is a niece if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a worse. sent11: something frees. sent12: if the nullah is a feline then the fact that the anchorite is a lineage is not wrong.
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the fuck is both an incendiary and a fipple.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the anchorite is a lineage and it is an incendiary.
sent1 -> int2: if that the oenomel is a kind of cardinal thing that does housekeep defiance does not hold that it is not cardinal is not false.; sent9 -> int3: if the dynamometer does not recite then the fact that it is cardinal and it does housekeep defiance is incorrect.; sent3 -> int4: that the dynamometer does not recite is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the dynamometer is a cardinal and it does housekeep defiance is not right.; int5 -> int6: there exists nothing such that it is cardinal thing that housekeeps defiance.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the oenomel is a cardinal and it does housekeep defiance is not true.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the oenomel is not a cardinal.; sent5 -> int9: the oenomel is trustful and taciturn.; int9 -> int10: the oenomel is trustful.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the oenomel is both non-cardinal and not distrustful.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is both not cardinal and trustful.; int12 & sent2 -> int13: the tutee is not a worse.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not a worse.; sent10 & int14 -> int15: the fuck is a kind of a fipple or it is a niece or both.; int15 & sent7 & sent8 -> int16: the anchorite is a kind of an incendiary.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is incendiary and it is a fipple does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not cardinal if that it is a kind of a cardinal and it housekeeps defiance is false. sent2: the tutee is not a worse if there is something such that it is non-cardinal and trustful. sent3: everything does not recite. sent4: that the fuck is a kind of an incendiary is right. sent5: everything is trustful and taciturn. sent6: the fuck is a fipple. sent7: the anchorite is incendiary if the fuck is a fipple. sent8: if the fuck is a kind of a niece the anchorite is a kind of an incendiary. sent9: if something does not recite that it is a cardinal and it does housekeep defiance is not correct. sent10: the fuck is a kind of a fipple and/or it is a niece if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a worse. sent11: something frees. sent12: if the nullah is a feline then the fact that the anchorite is a lineage is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the fuck is both an incendiary and a fipple.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__