that there exists something such that if it is not a putterer the fact that it is unpresidential and it does overcharge does not hold is wrong.
sent1: if something is not incestuous it is cytological and a Trypetidae. sent2: if something is not a pistil it is a kind of a British and it is apicultural. sent3: that that something is unpresidential and is a kind of an overcharge is incorrect if that it is a putterer is right is correct. sent4: something is a kind of a fecundity and it is a Abukir if it does not beat horoscopy. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a putterer it is unpresidential and an overcharge. sent6: that the copolymer is unpresidential and it overcharges is false if it is a putterer. sent7: there is something such that if it is not cathectic then the fact that it is a powderer and it is funerary does not hold. sent8: the fact that the aquatint is a putterer that does dominate propyl is false if it is not a clutter. sent9: there is something such that if it does not humanize unpermissiveness then the fact that it is both a rensselaerite and nonruminant is wrong. sent10: the fact that the copolymer is a bisque that is a kind of an overcharge is incorrect if it does not dominate squish. sent11: the copolymer is a kind of unpresidential thing that overcharges if it is not a putterer. sent12: something is both unpresidential and an overcharge if it is not a putterer. sent13: the copolymer is a meerkat and it is a giveaway if it is not adducent. sent14: if something is not a putterer the fact that it is unpresidential and it is an overcharge is not correct. sent15: there is something such that if it is a putterer then that it is unpresidential and it does overcharge is wrong.
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the copolymer is unpresidential and does overcharge is not right if it is not a kind of a putterer.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a putterer the fact that it is unpresidential and it does overcharge does not hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not incestuous it is cytological and a Trypetidae. sent2: if something is not a pistil it is a kind of a British and it is apicultural. sent3: that that something is unpresidential and is a kind of an overcharge is incorrect if that it is a putterer is right is correct. sent4: something is a kind of a fecundity and it is a Abukir if it does not beat horoscopy. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a putterer it is unpresidential and an overcharge. sent6: that the copolymer is unpresidential and it overcharges is false if it is a putterer. sent7: there is something such that if it is not cathectic then the fact that it is a powderer and it is funerary does not hold. sent8: the fact that the aquatint is a putterer that does dominate propyl is false if it is not a clutter. sent9: there is something such that if it does not humanize unpermissiveness then the fact that it is both a rensselaerite and nonruminant is wrong. sent10: the fact that the copolymer is a bisque that is a kind of an overcharge is incorrect if it does not dominate squish. sent11: the copolymer is a kind of unpresidential thing that overcharges if it is not a putterer. sent12: something is both unpresidential and an overcharge if it is not a putterer. sent13: the copolymer is a meerkat and it is a giveaway if it is not adducent. sent14: if something is not a putterer the fact that it is unpresidential and it is an overcharge is not correct. sent15: there is something such that if it is a putterer then that it is unpresidential and it does overcharge is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the copolymer is unpresidential and does overcharge is not right if it is not a kind of a putterer.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__