there exists something such that it is not pianistic.
sent1: the replacement does slave triteness if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Mycrosporidia and does aberrate is not correct. sent2: if something untwines and/or is not carbocyclic it is not a Isaac. sent3: something is not pianistic if that it bestirs thalassemia and/or is ratty is wrong. sent4: that the ultraviolet is a kind of a Mycrosporidia and does not slave triteness is not right if the housepaint does not slave nowhere. sent5: the fact that the ultraviolet is a Mycrosporidia and does slave triteness is not correct if the housepaint does not slave nowhere. sent6: the fact that the ultraviolet is not a Germanist and it is not carbocyclic is true if the fact that the singlet is not megaloblastic is not incorrect. sent7: the housepaint is not allowable. sent8: the fact that the housepaint is allowable thing that does not slave nowhere does not hold. sent9: that the ultraviolet is a Mycrosporidia and slaves triteness is not correct. sent10: something is pianistic. sent11: that that something bestirs thalassemia and/or is ratty is incorrect if it is not a Isaac is right. sent12: if that the housepaint is not allowable and does not slave nowhere does not hold it does not aberrate. sent13: the replacement is not pianistic if that the ultraviolet is a Mycrosporidia but it does not slave triteness is incorrect. sent14: if something slaves triteness it does not forget. sent15: if the ultraviolet does slave triteness then the replacement is not pianistic. sent16: if the singlet does aberrate the housepaint does aberrate. sent17: that the housepaint is a kind of a Mycrosporidia that aberrates is false if that the ultraviolet is not pianistic is not false. sent18: the singlet is non-megaloblastic if the fact that it does brace and it is non-megaloblastic is incorrect. sent19: the singlet aberrates.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the housepaint is non-allowable thing that does not slave nowhere is incorrect.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the housepaint does not aberrate.; sent16 & sent19 -> int2: the housepaint does aberrate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the housepaint is a kind of non-allowable thing that does not slave nowhere.; int4 -> int5: the housepaint does not slave nowhere.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the ultraviolet is a kind of a Mycrosporidia and does not slave triteness is wrong.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the replacement is not pianistic.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the replacement does not forget.
sent14 -> int8: if the replacement slaves triteness it does not forget.; sent3 -> int9: the ultraviolet is not pianistic if that it bestirs thalassemia and/or it is not non-ratty is not right.; sent11 -> int10: the fact that either the ultraviolet does bestir thalassemia or it is ratty or both is not right if it is not a Isaac.; sent2 -> int11: if the ultraviolet untwines or is non-carbocyclic or both then it is not a Isaac.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is not pianistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the replacement does slave triteness if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Mycrosporidia and does aberrate is not correct. sent2: if something untwines and/or is not carbocyclic it is not a Isaac. sent3: something is not pianistic if that it bestirs thalassemia and/or is ratty is wrong. sent4: that the ultraviolet is a kind of a Mycrosporidia and does not slave triteness is not right if the housepaint does not slave nowhere. sent5: the fact that the ultraviolet is a Mycrosporidia and does slave triteness is not correct if the housepaint does not slave nowhere. sent6: the fact that the ultraviolet is not a Germanist and it is not carbocyclic is true if the fact that the singlet is not megaloblastic is not incorrect. sent7: the housepaint is not allowable. sent8: the fact that the housepaint is allowable thing that does not slave nowhere does not hold. sent9: that the ultraviolet is a Mycrosporidia and slaves triteness is not correct. sent10: something is pianistic. sent11: that that something bestirs thalassemia and/or is ratty is incorrect if it is not a Isaac is right. sent12: if that the housepaint is not allowable and does not slave nowhere does not hold it does not aberrate. sent13: the replacement is not pianistic if that the ultraviolet is a Mycrosporidia but it does not slave triteness is incorrect. sent14: if something slaves triteness it does not forget. sent15: if the ultraviolet does slave triteness then the replacement is not pianistic. sent16: if the singlet does aberrate the housepaint does aberrate. sent17: that the housepaint is a kind of a Mycrosporidia that aberrates is false if that the ultraviolet is not pianistic is not false. sent18: the singlet is non-megaloblastic if the fact that it does brace and it is non-megaloblastic is incorrect. sent19: the singlet aberrates. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the housepaint is non-allowable thing that does not slave nowhere is incorrect.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the housepaint does not aberrate.; sent16 & sent19 -> int2: the housepaint does aberrate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the housepaint is a kind of non-allowable thing that does not slave nowhere.; int4 -> int5: the housepaint does not slave nowhere.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the ultraviolet is a kind of a Mycrosporidia and does not slave triteness is wrong.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the replacement is not pianistic.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__