the fact that the raspberry is not a kind of a laparoscope and it is not ethereal is false.
sent1: the Tory is not a laparoscope if the fact that something is a kind of a pantry is correct. sent2: either the pithead is a kind of a pantry or it is a laparoscope or both. sent3: if the Tory is not a laparoscope that the raspberry is not a laparoscope and is not ethereal does not hold. sent4: if the raspberry is not a pantry that the pithead is not a pantry and it is not ethereal does not hold. sent5: that the raspberry is not a kind of a laparoscope and is a kind of a pantry is false if the pithead is not a laparoscope. sent6: the pithead is a kind of a laparoscope and/or it is neurological. sent7: everything either is neurological or is a pantry or both. sent8: the fact that the Tory is a laparoscope but it is not ethereal is wrong. sent9: that the raspberry is not ethereal and is a laparoscope is false if the Tory is not ethereal. sent10: that the pithead is ethereal but it is not a laparoscope is false if the raspberry is not ethereal. sent11: there exists something such that either it is neurological or it is a laparoscope or both. sent12: that the pithead is non-ethereal and non-neurological is not right if the raspberry is not non-ethereal. sent13: if something is a laparoscope then the raspberry is not ethereal. sent14: if the pithead is not a laparoscope then the fact that the raspberry is not a kind of a laparoscope and is ethereal is not right.
sent7 -> int1: the pithead is neurological or it is a pantry or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is neurological and/or it is a pantry.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the raspberry is not a kind of a laparoscope and it is not ethereal is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tory is not a laparoscope if the fact that something is a kind of a pantry is correct. sent2: either the pithead is a kind of a pantry or it is a laparoscope or both. sent3: if the Tory is not a laparoscope that the raspberry is not a laparoscope and is not ethereal does not hold. sent4: if the raspberry is not a pantry that the pithead is not a pantry and it is not ethereal does not hold. sent5: that the raspberry is not a kind of a laparoscope and is a kind of a pantry is false if the pithead is not a laparoscope. sent6: the pithead is a kind of a laparoscope and/or it is neurological. sent7: everything either is neurological or is a pantry or both. sent8: the fact that the Tory is a laparoscope but it is not ethereal is wrong. sent9: that the raspberry is not ethereal and is a laparoscope is false if the Tory is not ethereal. sent10: that the pithead is ethereal but it is not a laparoscope is false if the raspberry is not ethereal. sent11: there exists something such that either it is neurological or it is a laparoscope or both. sent12: that the pithead is non-ethereal and non-neurological is not right if the raspberry is not non-ethereal. sent13: if something is a laparoscope then the raspberry is not ethereal. sent14: if the pithead is not a laparoscope then the fact that the raspberry is not a kind of a laparoscope and is ethereal is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the pithead is neurological or it is a pantry or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is neurological and/or it is a pantry.; __UNKNOWN__