the fact that the dislodgment does not occur and/or the looming connoisseur does not occur is true.
sent1: if the unprotectiveness does not occur the caning Ulmus does not occur. sent2: the unprotectiveness does not occur if the fact that the non-unexpendableness and the intergalacticness happens is not correct. sent3: that the Slovenian does not occur and the dislodgment does not occur is not true if the conchology does not occur. sent4: the ampleness does not occur if the fact that the attritionalness occurs hold. sent5: that the dislodgment does not occur is triggered by that the trespass occurs and/or the peek. sent6: the face-off occurs. sent7: the caning proteosome happens. sent8: if the peek occurs and the dislodgment happens the trespassing does not occur. sent9: the caning Ulmus does not occur if the Slovenianness occurs. sent10: if the peek occurs then the dislodgment does not occur. sent11: the conchology does not occur if that the eluting Dubonnet happens is not incorrect. sent12: if the fact that the Slovenian does not occur and the dislodgment does not occur does not hold the dislodgment occurs. sent13: either that the trespassing does not occur or that the peek happens or both is brought about by that the caning Ulmus does not occur. sent14: the attritionalness happens and the face-off happens. sent15: if the behavioristicness does not occur the fact that the non-unexpendableness and the intergalacticness happens is not correct. sent16: that either the trespassing does not occur or the peek happens or both yields that the trespassing does not occur. sent17: either the dislodgment does not occur or the looming connoisseur happens or both. sent18: if the caning Ulmus does not occur both the looming connoisseur and the peek occurs. sent19: the dislodgment happens and/or the looming connoisseur does not occur. sent20: the trespassing occurs if the ampleness does not occur. sent21: that the dislodgment does not occur and/or the looming connoisseur does not occur is not correct if the attritionalness does not occur. sent22: that the impropriety does not occur and the attritionalness happens is triggered by that the face-off does not occur. sent23: either the degeneration does not occur or the disconnecting does not occur or both. sent24: the fact that the eluting bologram does not occur is not false if the participation occurs.
sent14 -> int1: the attritionalness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ampleness does not occur.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the trespass happens.; int3 -> int4: the trespass happens and/or the peek happens.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the dislodgment does not occur.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that the dislodgment does not occur and/or the looming connoisseur does not occur does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dislodgment does not occur and/or the looming connoisseur does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the unprotectiveness does not occur the caning Ulmus does not occur. sent2: the unprotectiveness does not occur if the fact that the non-unexpendableness and the intergalacticness happens is not correct. sent3: that the Slovenian does not occur and the dislodgment does not occur is not true if the conchology does not occur. sent4: the ampleness does not occur if the fact that the attritionalness occurs hold. sent5: that the dislodgment does not occur is triggered by that the trespass occurs and/or the peek. sent6: the face-off occurs. sent7: the caning proteosome happens. sent8: if the peek occurs and the dislodgment happens the trespassing does not occur. sent9: the caning Ulmus does not occur if the Slovenianness occurs. sent10: if the peek occurs then the dislodgment does not occur. sent11: the conchology does not occur if that the eluting Dubonnet happens is not incorrect. sent12: if the fact that the Slovenian does not occur and the dislodgment does not occur does not hold the dislodgment occurs. sent13: either that the trespassing does not occur or that the peek happens or both is brought about by that the caning Ulmus does not occur. sent14: the attritionalness happens and the face-off happens. sent15: if the behavioristicness does not occur the fact that the non-unexpendableness and the intergalacticness happens is not correct. sent16: that either the trespassing does not occur or the peek happens or both yields that the trespassing does not occur. sent17: either the dislodgment does not occur or the looming connoisseur happens or both. sent18: if the caning Ulmus does not occur both the looming connoisseur and the peek occurs. sent19: the dislodgment happens and/or the looming connoisseur does not occur. sent20: the trespassing occurs if the ampleness does not occur. sent21: that the dislodgment does not occur and/or the looming connoisseur does not occur is not correct if the attritionalness does not occur. sent22: that the impropriety does not occur and the attritionalness happens is triggered by that the face-off does not occur. sent23: either the degeneration does not occur or the disconnecting does not occur or both. sent24: the fact that the eluting bologram does not occur is not false if the participation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the attritionalness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the ampleness does not occur.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the trespass happens.; int3 -> int4: the trespass happens and/or the peek happens.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the dislodgment does not occur.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__