if the dash happens that the fruitage but not the kidnapping seaside happens is not right.
sent1: the individuating Characinidae does not occur. sent2: if the dash occurs the fact that both the fruitage and the kidnapping seaside happens is not correct. sent3: the Shavianness occurs. sent4: the individuating rivulus does not occur. sent5: the metrification does not occur if the fact that that both the non-cysticness and the metrification happens hold does not hold. sent6: if the solfege occurs and the fleeing happens then the proprioceptiveness does not occur. sent7: the scanning occurs and the ramming happens. sent8: the paternity occurs. sent9: the anguineness does not occur if the dominance occurs and the mnemonics happens. sent10: the individuating blende does not occur. sent11: if the stainableness occurs then the fact that the glialness but not the ram happens is wrong. sent12: that the cysticness and the paternity happens yields that the dash occurs. sent13: that the fruitage occurs but the kidnapping seaside does not occur does not hold if the cysticness does not occur. sent14: the fact that the solfege does not occur hold. sent15: the dashing brings about that the fruitage but not the kidnapping seaside happens. sent16: the fact that both the fruitage and the kidnapping seaside happens is not right. sent17: if the fact that the cysticness does not occur is not incorrect then that both the fruitage and the kidnapping seaside happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dashing occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the cysticness happens is not false.; assump2 & sent8 -> int1: the cysticness happens and the paternity occurs.;
the metrification does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the dash happens that the fruitage but not the kidnapping seaside happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the individuating Characinidae does not occur. sent2: if the dash occurs the fact that both the fruitage and the kidnapping seaside happens is not correct. sent3: the Shavianness occurs. sent4: the individuating rivulus does not occur. sent5: the metrification does not occur if the fact that that both the non-cysticness and the metrification happens hold does not hold. sent6: if the solfege occurs and the fleeing happens then the proprioceptiveness does not occur. sent7: the scanning occurs and the ramming happens. sent8: the paternity occurs. sent9: the anguineness does not occur if the dominance occurs and the mnemonics happens. sent10: the individuating blende does not occur. sent11: if the stainableness occurs then the fact that the glialness but not the ram happens is wrong. sent12: that the cysticness and the paternity happens yields that the dash occurs. sent13: that the fruitage occurs but the kidnapping seaside does not occur does not hold if the cysticness does not occur. sent14: the fact that the solfege does not occur hold. sent15: the dashing brings about that the fruitage but not the kidnapping seaside happens. sent16: the fact that both the fruitage and the kidnapping seaside happens is not right. sent17: if the fact that the cysticness does not occur is not incorrect then that both the fruitage and the kidnapping seaside happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dashing occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the cysticness happens is not false.; assump2 & sent8 -> int1: the cysticness happens and the paternity occurs.; __UNKNOWN__