the fact that there is something such that if it is not an affine then the fact that it does barb slatternliness and is hopeful does not hold is not right.
sent1: if the serratus is not a web the fact that it is a kind of a mintage and is a porte-cochere is not right. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not bladdery hold the fact that it is flaky and is homemade is incorrect. sent3: a non-affine thing does barb slatternliness and is hopeful. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not barb mindfulness then that it is a slant and it reveals is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it overpowers anchorite that it is coherent and it is a kind of a postdiluvian does not hold. sent6: that the Fry barbs slatternliness and it is torrential is not correct if it is not euphonic. sent7: if the urethra is not a kind of an affine it does barb slatternliness and is hopeful. sent8: that the Buddhist is thalloid and it is a hiccup is not true if it is not hopeful. sent9: that the urethra barbs slatternliness and it is hopeful does not hold if it is a kind of an affine. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not affine it barbs slatternliness and is hopeful. sent11: that something does barb slatternliness and it is hopeful does not hold if it is non-affine. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a lepidomelane that it is a housefly that is a miniaturization is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is batholithic then that it is a spouter and it is unretentive does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not starve the fact that it does undergrow and is erythropoietic is not true. sent15: if something does not hiccup that it is scopal and a Nonconformist is not right. sent16: that if something is affine the fact that it barbs slatternliness and is hopeful is not correct hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a arsenical the fact that that it is a miniaturization and it is unpronounceable hold is incorrect.
sent11 -> int1: if the urethra is not an affine then that it does barb slatternliness and it is hopeful is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not an affine then the fact that it does barb slatternliness and is hopeful does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the serratus is not a web the fact that it is a kind of a mintage and is a porte-cochere is not right. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not bladdery hold the fact that it is flaky and is homemade is incorrect. sent3: a non-affine thing does barb slatternliness and is hopeful. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not barb mindfulness then that it is a slant and it reveals is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it overpowers anchorite that it is coherent and it is a kind of a postdiluvian does not hold. sent6: that the Fry barbs slatternliness and it is torrential is not correct if it is not euphonic. sent7: if the urethra is not a kind of an affine it does barb slatternliness and is hopeful. sent8: that the Buddhist is thalloid and it is a hiccup is not true if it is not hopeful. sent9: that the urethra barbs slatternliness and it is hopeful does not hold if it is a kind of an affine. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not affine it barbs slatternliness and is hopeful. sent11: that something does barb slatternliness and it is hopeful does not hold if it is non-affine. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a lepidomelane that it is a housefly that is a miniaturization is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is batholithic then that it is a spouter and it is unretentive does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not starve the fact that it does undergrow and is erythropoietic is not true. sent15: if something does not hiccup that it is scopal and a Nonconformist is not right. sent16: that if something is affine the fact that it barbs slatternliness and is hopeful is not correct hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a arsenical the fact that that it is a miniaturization and it is unpronounceable hold is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the urethra is not an affine then that it does barb slatternliness and it is hopeful is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__