the trustfulness does not occur.
sent1: if the pneumaticness does not occur both the dirtiness and the trustfulness happens. sent2: the fact that the downturn does not occur but the airburst occurs is not correct. sent3: the dirtying occurs. sent4: if the negotiating George happens the trustfulness does not occur. sent5: if the vampirism does not occur or the beholding dyschezia happens or both then the pneumaticness does not occur. sent6: the onshoreness does not occur if that not the premiership but the equation occurs does not hold. sent7: that not the counting but the bowl happens is not correct. sent8: that not the negotiating George but the ciliariness happens does not hold if the fact that the dirtying does not occur is false. sent9: that not the junket but the backstop occurs is false if the trawling occurs. sent10: if the inexpressibleness happens then the vampirism does not occur and/or the beholding dyschezia occurs. sent11: the fact that the negotiating George happens and the ciliariness happens is not true. sent12: if the fact that not the negotiating George but the ciliariness occurs is not true then the trustfulness does not occur. sent13: if the dirtiness occurs then that the negotiating George happens and the ciliariness occurs is incorrect.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: that the negotiating George does not occur and the ciliariness happens is incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the trustfulness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the trustfulness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pneumaticness does not occur both the dirtiness and the trustfulness happens. sent2: the fact that the downturn does not occur but the airburst occurs is not correct. sent3: the dirtying occurs. sent4: if the negotiating George happens the trustfulness does not occur. sent5: if the vampirism does not occur or the beholding dyschezia happens or both then the pneumaticness does not occur. sent6: the onshoreness does not occur if that not the premiership but the equation occurs does not hold. sent7: that not the counting but the bowl happens is not correct. sent8: that not the negotiating George but the ciliariness happens does not hold if the fact that the dirtying does not occur is false. sent9: that not the junket but the backstop occurs is false if the trawling occurs. sent10: if the inexpressibleness happens then the vampirism does not occur and/or the beholding dyschezia occurs. sent11: the fact that the negotiating George happens and the ciliariness happens is not true. sent12: if the fact that not the negotiating George but the ciliariness occurs is not true then the trustfulness does not occur. sent13: if the dirtiness occurs then that the negotiating George happens and the ciliariness occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: that the negotiating George does not occur and the ciliariness happens is incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__