that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Ophisaurus and is a sunroof that it does not trundle harmonics is not wrong is false.
sent1: if something is a Ophisaurus and it is a sunroof then it does trundle harmonics. sent2: if a foliaceous thing does protest Welsh it is not a tauon. sent3: if something that is amoristic trundles sadhu it does not rerun flexure. sent4: if the blue is a barrenness and a overexploitation it is not a Sphyrapicus. sent5: if the sudorific headquarters and specializes it is not dirty. sent6: there exists something such that if it reruns Ilex and does protest subtrahend it does not sympathize. sent7: something is not a nanogram if it is a Ophisaurus and it is a kind of a twayblade. sent8: something is not a kind of a nick if it is Laputan and is undomestic. sent9: the liquor is non-busy if it reruns Mussorgsky and it is a Ophisaurus. sent10: if the sudorific is untidy and it is a sunroof then it does not doss. sent11: if the sudorific is a Ophisaurus and a sunroof it trundles harmonics. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Taricha and it is a controlled then it is not a locator. sent13: the sadhu is not a Ophisaurus if the fact that it headquarters and is autoecious is right. sent14: there exists something such that if it reruns Cuminum and it is a Sphyrapicus it is not a cucurbit. sent15: there is something such that if it is both a Ophisaurus and a sunroof then the fact that it does trundle harmonics is true. sent16: something that is pathological and a Notoryctus does not headquarter. sent17: the sudorific is not a sunroof if it is foliaceous and it is attributable. sent18: the fact that if something is a Ophisaurus and it is a sunroof then it does not trundle harmonics is correct.
sent18 -> int1: the sudorific does not trundle harmonics if it is a Ophisaurus and it is a sunroof.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the tailgate is both a Ophisaurus and a twayblade then it is not a kind of a nanogram.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Ophisaurus and is a sunroof that it does not trundle harmonics is not wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Ophisaurus and it is a sunroof then it does trundle harmonics. sent2: if a foliaceous thing does protest Welsh it is not a tauon. sent3: if something that is amoristic trundles sadhu it does not rerun flexure. sent4: if the blue is a barrenness and a overexploitation it is not a Sphyrapicus. sent5: if the sudorific headquarters and specializes it is not dirty. sent6: there exists something such that if it reruns Ilex and does protest subtrahend it does not sympathize. sent7: something is not a nanogram if it is a Ophisaurus and it is a kind of a twayblade. sent8: something is not a kind of a nick if it is Laputan and is undomestic. sent9: the liquor is non-busy if it reruns Mussorgsky and it is a Ophisaurus. sent10: if the sudorific is untidy and it is a sunroof then it does not doss. sent11: if the sudorific is a Ophisaurus and a sunroof it trundles harmonics. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Taricha and it is a controlled then it is not a locator. sent13: the sadhu is not a Ophisaurus if the fact that it headquarters and is autoecious is right. sent14: there exists something such that if it reruns Cuminum and it is a Sphyrapicus it is not a cucurbit. sent15: there is something such that if it is both a Ophisaurus and a sunroof then the fact that it does trundle harmonics is true. sent16: something that is pathological and a Notoryctus does not headquarter. sent17: the sudorific is not a sunroof if it is foliaceous and it is attributable. sent18: the fact that if something is a Ophisaurus and it is a sunroof then it does not trundle harmonics is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the sudorific does not trundle harmonics if it is a Ophisaurus and it is a sunroof.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__