that the piperacillin is not a kind of a Adad and it does not certify is wrong.
sent1: if something is not unsusceptible the frog is a Adad or it certifies or both. sent2: the pseudopod is a plumpness and cacodemonic if there is something such that that it does not hurtle piperacillin is true. sent3: everything does lather Colony and it lathers convertible. sent4: the fact that the piperacillin is not a kind of a Adad and does certify is not right. sent5: that the pseudopod hurtles piperacillin is not incorrect. sent6: if something that is good is not a kind of a kaon it is not unsusceptible. sent7: The piperacillin does not hurtle neopallium. sent8: that the pseudopod is a kind of a good is correct. sent9: there is something such that it hurtles piperacillin. sent10: there is something such that it is cacodemonic. sent11: if something does certify it is a plumpness. sent12: if that something does not hurtle piperacillin and is cacodemonic is not true then it does hurtle piperacillin. sent13: that something is not cacodemonic and it is not dirty does not hold if the fact that it does hurtle piperacillin is right. sent14: the neopallium does not hurtle piperacillin. sent15: if something is a plumpness it does hurtle piperacillin. sent16: the fact that the piperacillin is a kind of a Adad but it does not certify is wrong. sent17: that the piperacillin is not a Adad and does certify does not hold if the pseudopod is a kind of a plumpness. sent18: something is not a kind of a kaon but it is riparian if it does lather Colony. sent19: something is a kind of a plumpness if the fact that it is a Adad is not incorrect.
sent14 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not hurtle piperacillin.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the pseudopod is a plumpness and is cacodemonic.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the pseudopod is a kind of a plumpness is not false.;
the fact that the frog is non-cacodemonic and not dirty is false.
sent3 -> int4: the slush does lather Colony and lathers convertible.; int4 -> int5: the slush lathers Colony.; int5 -> int6: everything does lather Colony.; int6 -> int7: the piperacillin does lather Colony.; sent18 -> int8: the fact that the piperacillin is not the kaon and is riparian if the piperacillin does lather Colony is true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the piperacillin is not a kaon but it is riparian.; int9 -> int10: everything is not a kaon and it is riparian.; int10 -> int11: the pseudopod is not a kaon but it is riparian.; int11 -> int12: the pseudopod is not a kaon.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: the pseudopod is a good and is not a kind of a kaon.; sent6 -> int14: if the pseudopod is a good but it is not a kind of a kaon then it is not unsusceptible.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the pseudopod is not unsusceptible.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is not unsusceptible.; int16 & sent1 -> int17: the frog is a kind of a Adad and/or does certify.; sent19 -> int18: the frog is a plumpness if it is a Adad.; sent11 -> int19: if the frog certifies then it is a plumpness.; int17 & int18 & int19 -> int20: the frog is a plumpness.; sent15 -> int21: the frog does hurtle piperacillin if the fact that it is a plumpness hold.; int20 & int21 -> int22: the frog does hurtle piperacillin.; sent13 -> int23: the fact that that the frog is the kind of non-cacodemonic thing that is not dirty is false if that the frog does hurtle piperacillin is not incorrect is not wrong.; int22 & int23 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the piperacillin is not a kind of a Adad and it does not certify is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not unsusceptible the frog is a Adad or it certifies or both. sent2: the pseudopod is a plumpness and cacodemonic if there is something such that that it does not hurtle piperacillin is true. sent3: everything does lather Colony and it lathers convertible. sent4: the fact that the piperacillin is not a kind of a Adad and does certify is not right. sent5: that the pseudopod hurtles piperacillin is not incorrect. sent6: if something that is good is not a kind of a kaon it is not unsusceptible. sent7: The piperacillin does not hurtle neopallium. sent8: that the pseudopod is a kind of a good is correct. sent9: there is something such that it hurtles piperacillin. sent10: there is something such that it is cacodemonic. sent11: if something does certify it is a plumpness. sent12: if that something does not hurtle piperacillin and is cacodemonic is not true then it does hurtle piperacillin. sent13: that something is not cacodemonic and it is not dirty does not hold if the fact that it does hurtle piperacillin is right. sent14: the neopallium does not hurtle piperacillin. sent15: if something is a plumpness it does hurtle piperacillin. sent16: the fact that the piperacillin is a kind of a Adad but it does not certify is wrong. sent17: that the piperacillin is not a Adad and does certify does not hold if the pseudopod is a kind of a plumpness. sent18: something is not a kind of a kaon but it is riparian if it does lather Colony. sent19: something is a kind of a plumpness if the fact that it is a Adad is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not hurtle piperacillin.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the pseudopod is a plumpness and is cacodemonic.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the pseudopod is a kind of a plumpness is not false.; __UNKNOWN__