there is something such that it is a kind of mercuric thing that is a Lahore.
sent1: there is something such that it is a miotic. sent2: if the L-dopa is a Lahore or it is not mercuric or both the Mormon is not aeronautical. sent3: the vandyke is biogeographic thing that is a kind of a quark if there is something such that it does not manhandle creamery. sent4: if the fact that something does awe L-dopa but it is not anthropic does not hold it does not discountenance Mormon. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Lahore. sent6: the fact that the L-dopa is aeronautical but it does not awe L-dopa is not correct. sent7: the L-dopa is non-mercuric if the fact that it is aeronautical and it does not discountenance Mormon does not hold. sent8: the vandyke is mercuric if the L-dopa discountenances Mormon. sent9: there is something such that it does reincarnate. sent10: the fact that the myrtle awes L-dopa and it is anthropic is false. sent11: if something is anthropic then it does not discountenance Mormon. sent12: if something is not a naphazoline then either it is a kind of a Lahore or it is not mercuric or both. sent13: there is something such that it does not manhandle creamery. sent14: the fact that the L-dopa is aeronautical thing that does discountenance Mormon is not correct. sent15: that the L-dopa is a kind of aeronautical thing that does not discountenance Mormon does not hold if the myrtle does not discountenance Mormon. sent16: the fact that the myrtle awes L-dopa but it is not anthropic is wrong. sent17: if the vandyke is a quark and is a naphazoline the L-dopa is not a naphazoline. sent18: the myrtle does not discountenance Mormon if the fact that it is anthropic is true. sent19: something is a naphazoline if the fact that it is not a pair and does not reincarnate is not correct. sent20: if the myrtle does not discountenance Mormon that the L-dopa is aeronautical and does discountenance Mormon is incorrect. sent21: the fact that that the vandyke is mercuric but not non-aeronautical is not true hold. sent22: that everything is a Lahore is correct.
sent4 -> int1: if that that the myrtle does awe L-dopa but it is not anthropic is not true is not incorrect then it does not discountenance Mormon.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the myrtle does not discountenance Mormon.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: that the L-dopa is aeronautical and does not discountenance Mormon is not correct.; sent22 -> int4: the fact that the vandyke is a Lahore hold.;
the Mormon does discountenance Mormon and it manhandles Atropidae.
sent12 -> int5: if the L-dopa is not a kind of a naphazoline it is a kind of a Lahore and/or is not mercuric.; sent13 & sent3 -> int6: the vandyke is biogeographic a quark.; int6 -> int7: the vandyke is a quark.; sent19 -> int8: if the fact that the vandyke does not pair and does not reincarnate is not correct then it is a naphazoline.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is a kind of mercuric thing that is a Lahore. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is a miotic. sent2: if the L-dopa is a Lahore or it is not mercuric or both the Mormon is not aeronautical. sent3: the vandyke is biogeographic thing that is a kind of a quark if there is something such that it does not manhandle creamery. sent4: if the fact that something does awe L-dopa but it is not anthropic does not hold it does not discountenance Mormon. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Lahore. sent6: the fact that the L-dopa is aeronautical but it does not awe L-dopa is not correct. sent7: the L-dopa is non-mercuric if the fact that it is aeronautical and it does not discountenance Mormon does not hold. sent8: the vandyke is mercuric if the L-dopa discountenances Mormon. sent9: there is something such that it does reincarnate. sent10: the fact that the myrtle awes L-dopa and it is anthropic is false. sent11: if something is anthropic then it does not discountenance Mormon. sent12: if something is not a naphazoline then either it is a kind of a Lahore or it is not mercuric or both. sent13: there is something such that it does not manhandle creamery. sent14: the fact that the L-dopa is aeronautical thing that does discountenance Mormon is not correct. sent15: that the L-dopa is a kind of aeronautical thing that does not discountenance Mormon does not hold if the myrtle does not discountenance Mormon. sent16: the fact that the myrtle awes L-dopa but it is not anthropic is wrong. sent17: if the vandyke is a quark and is a naphazoline the L-dopa is not a naphazoline. sent18: the myrtle does not discountenance Mormon if the fact that it is anthropic is true. sent19: something is a naphazoline if the fact that it is not a pair and does not reincarnate is not correct. sent20: if the myrtle does not discountenance Mormon that the L-dopa is aeronautical and does discountenance Mormon is incorrect. sent21: the fact that that the vandyke is mercuric but not non-aeronautical is not true hold. sent22: that everything is a Lahore is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if that that the myrtle does awe L-dopa but it is not anthropic is not true is not incorrect then it does not discountenance Mormon.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the myrtle does not discountenance Mormon.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: that the L-dopa is aeronautical and does not discountenance Mormon is not correct.; sent22 -> int4: the fact that the vandyke is a Lahore hold.; __UNKNOWN__