the sarong is a inchworm.
sent1: the fact that the smegma does coo shearing hold if that it is non-aplitic and it is an escort is false. sent2: that the sarong does not coo shearing and does not synchronize is false if the fact that the smegma is not unlikely is correct. sent3: the fact that the smegma is aplitic and it is an escort is wrong. sent4: if that something is a Caeciliidae and quadrupedal is wrong it is not a Caeciliidae. sent5: the Guinness is nonmagnetic if it is not a kris. sent6: if the smegma does not synchronize that the toaster does not synchronize and/or is unlikely is false. sent7: if the toaster is not electrical that it is a Caeciliidae and is quadrupedal is not true. sent8: the smegma is a kind of a celioscopy. sent9: if the fact that the sarong is a celioscopy is correct the smegma is not aplitic and/or it is an escort. sent10: something synchronizes and does not immortalize thorax. sent11: if the smegma does not synchronize then that the toaster synchronize hold. sent12: the smegma is not a Pliocene but an illiteracy. sent13: the toaster is not electrical. sent14: the smegma does not synchronize if it is both not non-aplitic and an escort. sent15: the sarong is not a inchworm if that there exists something such that it is a celioscopy that does not immortalize thorax is not wrong. sent16: if that something does not coo shearing and it does not synchronize does not hold it is a kind of a inchworm. sent17: the fact that the joggle does not coo shearing hold. sent18: the joggle is a Caeciliidae. sent19: if the smegma is non-aplitic thing that escorts it does not synchronize. sent20: the smegma is a Caeciliidae. sent21: something is a kind of a celioscopy but it does not immortalize thorax if it coos shearing. sent22: if the joggle is a Caeciliidae then the toaster does not synchronize and/or is unlikely.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smegma is a kind of non-aplitic thing that does escort.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the smegma does not synchronize.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the toaster does not synchronize and/or it is unlikely does not hold.; sent22 & sent18 -> int3: the toaster does not synchronize and/or it is unlikely.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that that the smegma is both not aplitic and an escort hold does not hold.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the smegma coos shearing.; sent21 -> int7: if the smegma coos shearing it is a kind of a celioscopy and it does not immortalize thorax.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the smegma is a celioscopy but it does not immortalize thorax.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a celioscopy that does not immortalize thorax.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sarong is a inchworm is true.
sent16 -> int10: if that the sarong does not coo shearing and does not synchronize does not hold it is a inchworm.; sent4 -> int11: the fact that the toaster is not a kind of the Caeciliidae if the fact that the fact that the toaster is a Caeciliidae and it is quadrupedal is incorrect is correct hold.; sent7 & sent13 -> int12: that that the toaster is a Caeciliidae and it is quadrupedal is false is true.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the toaster is not a Caeciliidae.; int13 -> int14: something is not a kind of a Caeciliidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the sarong is a inchworm. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the smegma does coo shearing hold if that it is non-aplitic and it is an escort is false. sent2: that the sarong does not coo shearing and does not synchronize is false if the fact that the smegma is not unlikely is correct. sent3: the fact that the smegma is aplitic and it is an escort is wrong. sent4: if that something is a Caeciliidae and quadrupedal is wrong it is not a Caeciliidae. sent5: the Guinness is nonmagnetic if it is not a kris. sent6: if the smegma does not synchronize that the toaster does not synchronize and/or is unlikely is false. sent7: if the toaster is not electrical that it is a Caeciliidae and is quadrupedal is not true. sent8: the smegma is a kind of a celioscopy. sent9: if the fact that the sarong is a celioscopy is correct the smegma is not aplitic and/or it is an escort. sent10: something synchronizes and does not immortalize thorax. sent11: if the smegma does not synchronize then that the toaster synchronize hold. sent12: the smegma is not a Pliocene but an illiteracy. sent13: the toaster is not electrical. sent14: the smegma does not synchronize if it is both not non-aplitic and an escort. sent15: the sarong is not a inchworm if that there exists something such that it is a celioscopy that does not immortalize thorax is not wrong. sent16: if that something does not coo shearing and it does not synchronize does not hold it is a kind of a inchworm. sent17: the fact that the joggle does not coo shearing hold. sent18: the joggle is a Caeciliidae. sent19: if the smegma is non-aplitic thing that escorts it does not synchronize. sent20: the smegma is a Caeciliidae. sent21: something is a kind of a celioscopy but it does not immortalize thorax if it coos shearing. sent22: if the joggle is a Caeciliidae then the toaster does not synchronize and/or is unlikely. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smegma is a kind of non-aplitic thing that does escort.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the smegma does not synchronize.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the toaster does not synchronize and/or it is unlikely does not hold.; sent22 & sent18 -> int3: the toaster does not synchronize and/or it is unlikely.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that that the smegma is both not aplitic and an escort hold does not hold.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the smegma coos shearing.; sent21 -> int7: if the smegma coos shearing it is a kind of a celioscopy and it does not immortalize thorax.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the smegma is a celioscopy but it does not immortalize thorax.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a celioscopy that does not immortalize thorax.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__