the bettering personification and the paving happens.
sent1: if the Hegelian does not occur the bettering personification happens. sent2: either the cornering growl or the orchestralness or both occurs. sent3: the pyogenicness happens. sent4: that the espionage does not occur leads to that the notation and the paving happens. sent5: the Hegelian does not occur if the fact that the cornering growl does not occur and/or the orchestralness happens is incorrect. sent6: the retaliation does not occur if the cornering growl does not occur. sent7: the cornering growl occurs. sent8: the espionage does not occur. sent9: not the grafting but the pyogenicness happens if the cornering belemnite does not occur. sent10: the grafting happens if the retaliation does not occur. sent11: that the retaliation does not occur is triggered by either that the cornering growl does not occur or that the orchestralness occurs or both. sent12: the cornering belemnite does not occur. sent13: if the cornering belemnite does not occur the pyogenicness happens. sent14: if that the cornering growl or the orchestralness or both happens is not correct then the Hegelian does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cornering growl does not occur and/or the orchestralness occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the retaliation does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the grafting occurs.; sent9 & sent12 -> int3: not the graft but the pyogenicness happens.; int3 -> int4: the grafting does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the cornering growl does not occur or the orchestralness happens or both is incorrect.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the Hegelianness does not occur.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the bettering personification happens.; sent4 & sent8 -> int9: the notation happens and the paving happens.; int9 -> int10: the paving happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the bettering personification and the paving occurs is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bettering personification and the paving happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Hegelian does not occur the bettering personification happens. sent2: either the cornering growl or the orchestralness or both occurs. sent3: the pyogenicness happens. sent4: that the espionage does not occur leads to that the notation and the paving happens. sent5: the Hegelian does not occur if the fact that the cornering growl does not occur and/or the orchestralness happens is incorrect. sent6: the retaliation does not occur if the cornering growl does not occur. sent7: the cornering growl occurs. sent8: the espionage does not occur. sent9: not the grafting but the pyogenicness happens if the cornering belemnite does not occur. sent10: the grafting happens if the retaliation does not occur. sent11: that the retaliation does not occur is triggered by either that the cornering growl does not occur or that the orchestralness occurs or both. sent12: the cornering belemnite does not occur. sent13: if the cornering belemnite does not occur the pyogenicness happens. sent14: if that the cornering growl or the orchestralness or both happens is not correct then the Hegelian does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cornering growl does not occur and/or the orchestralness occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the retaliation does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the grafting occurs.; sent9 & sent12 -> int3: not the graft but the pyogenicness happens.; int3 -> int4: the grafting does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the cornering growl does not occur or the orchestralness happens or both is incorrect.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the Hegelianness does not occur.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the bettering personification happens.; sent4 & sent8 -> int9: the notation happens and the paving happens.; int9 -> int10: the paving happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__