the Javanthropus genuflects if the hub travesties resorption but it does not consort bluefin.
sent1: that if the hub does jockey current the hub is esoteric is correct. sent2: if the combine is not a ricegrass or it does not clank Manduca or both the current is rayless. sent3: the combine is not a ricegrass and/or does not clank Manduca if the Chuvash is not a canonist. sent4: the fact that something does not clank Manduca and is a ricegrass does not hold if the fact that it is non-canonist is not incorrect. sent5: the Javanthropus is not a kind of a canonist if that the Chuvash does genuflect and is rayless is wrong. sent6: if the Chuvash either is non-canonist or does not consort bluefin or both then the hub does travesty resorption. sent7: the combine is not a ricegrass and/or it does clank Manduca. sent8: the Javanthropus genuflects if the current is rayless. sent9: if the Chuvash is a kind of a canonist that the hub travesties resorption but it does not consort bluefin is not right. sent10: the current does gum.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hub does travesty resorption but it does not consort bluefin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Chuvash is a canonist.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hub travesties resorption but it does not consort bluefin is wrong.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Chuvash is not a canonist.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: either the combine is not a kind of a ricegrass or it does not clank Manduca or both.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the current is rayless is correct.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that the Javanthropus genuflects is not false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the Javanthropus is not a ricegrass.
sent4 -> int7: that the Javanthropus does not clank Manduca and is a ricegrass is wrong if it is not canonist.;
$hypothesis$ = the Javanthropus genuflects if the hub travesties resorption but it does not consort bluefin. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the hub does jockey current the hub is esoteric is correct. sent2: if the combine is not a ricegrass or it does not clank Manduca or both the current is rayless. sent3: the combine is not a ricegrass and/or does not clank Manduca if the Chuvash is not a canonist. sent4: the fact that something does not clank Manduca and is a ricegrass does not hold if the fact that it is non-canonist is not incorrect. sent5: the Javanthropus is not a kind of a canonist if that the Chuvash does genuflect and is rayless is wrong. sent6: if the Chuvash either is non-canonist or does not consort bluefin or both then the hub does travesty resorption. sent7: the combine is not a ricegrass and/or it does clank Manduca. sent8: the Javanthropus genuflects if the current is rayless. sent9: if the Chuvash is a kind of a canonist that the hub travesties resorption but it does not consort bluefin is not right. sent10: the current does gum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hub does travesty resorption but it does not consort bluefin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Chuvash is a canonist.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hub travesties resorption but it does not consort bluefin is wrong.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Chuvash is not a canonist.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: either the combine is not a kind of a ricegrass or it does not clank Manduca or both.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the current is rayless is correct.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that the Javanthropus genuflects is not false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__