the domestication is mandibulofacial.
sent1: the tack does hypothecate rash and it is syncretic. sent2: the domestication is a pigfish. sent3: the microbalance is not an incongruity if the domestication is not an incongruity and hypothecates make-believe. sent4: if something hypothecates rash the domestication does hypothecate make-believe. sent5: the microbalance is catalatic. sent6: the tack is mandibulofacial thing that does gibber. sent7: if the microbalance is not non-catalatic it is a kind of a musher. sent8: there exists something such that it does spit. sent9: the tack is syncretic. sent10: the biomass is mandibulofacial. sent11: the wheel is mandibulofacial and it does war. sent12: if something is catalatic and not a musher it is mandibulofacial. sent13: the domestication is a one if the microbalance is a musher. sent14: if an incongruity does hypothecate make-believe then it is not mandibulofacial. sent15: something that is a one is a kind of an incongruity.
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the microbalance is a kind of a musher.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the domestication is a one.; sent15 -> int3: the domestication is an incongruity if it is a one.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the domestication is a kind of an incongruity is not wrong.; sent1 -> int5: the tack hypothecates rash.; int5 -> int6: something does hypothecate rash.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the domestication does hypothecate make-believe.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the domestication is an incongruity and it does hypothecate make-believe.; sent14 -> int9: if the domestication is an incongruity and it does hypothecate make-believe it is not mandibulofacial.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the domestication is mandibulofacial.
sent12 -> int10: the domestication is mandibulofacial if it is a kind of catalatic thing that is not a musher.;
$hypothesis$ = the domestication is mandibulofacial. ; $context$ = sent1: the tack does hypothecate rash and it is syncretic. sent2: the domestication is a pigfish. sent3: the microbalance is not an incongruity if the domestication is not an incongruity and hypothecates make-believe. sent4: if something hypothecates rash the domestication does hypothecate make-believe. sent5: the microbalance is catalatic. sent6: the tack is mandibulofacial thing that does gibber. sent7: if the microbalance is not non-catalatic it is a kind of a musher. sent8: there exists something such that it does spit. sent9: the tack is syncretic. sent10: the biomass is mandibulofacial. sent11: the wheel is mandibulofacial and it does war. sent12: if something is catalatic and not a musher it is mandibulofacial. sent13: the domestication is a one if the microbalance is a musher. sent14: if an incongruity does hypothecate make-believe then it is not mandibulofacial. sent15: something that is a one is a kind of an incongruity. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the microbalance is a kind of a musher.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the domestication is a one.; sent15 -> int3: the domestication is an incongruity if it is a one.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the domestication is a kind of an incongruity is not wrong.; sent1 -> int5: the tack hypothecates rash.; int5 -> int6: something does hypothecate rash.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the domestication does hypothecate make-believe.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the domestication is an incongruity and it does hypothecate make-believe.; sent14 -> int9: if the domestication is an incongruity and it does hypothecate make-believe it is not mandibulofacial.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__