the pleasing happens and the coo does not occur.
sent1: if that the looking esthetician happens and the snicking happens is right that the looting does not occur is correct. sent2: the erectingness happens. sent3: the jamming does not occur. sent4: both the looking esthetician and the phosphorescence happens. sent5: that the pleasing occurs and the cooing does not occur is not right if that the looking esthetician does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: that the looking esthetician does not occur and the phosphorescence does not occur brings about that the ethicalness does not occur. sent7: that the snick does not occur and the jamming does not occur prevents the cooing. sent8: the phosphorescence happens. sent9: that the looting happens is not false.
sent4 -> int1: the looking esthetician occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snick happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the looking esthetician and the snicking occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the looting does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the snicking does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the snick does not occur and the jamming does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the coo does not occur.;
the fact that the fact that the pleasing but not the coo happens is not correct is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the pleasing happens and the coo does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the looking esthetician happens and the snicking happens is right that the looting does not occur is correct. sent2: the erectingness happens. sent3: the jamming does not occur. sent4: both the looking esthetician and the phosphorescence happens. sent5: that the pleasing occurs and the cooing does not occur is not right if that the looking esthetician does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: that the looking esthetician does not occur and the phosphorescence does not occur brings about that the ethicalness does not occur. sent7: that the snick does not occur and the jamming does not occur prevents the cooing. sent8: the phosphorescence happens. sent9: that the looting happens is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the looking esthetician occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snick happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the looking esthetician and the snicking occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the looting does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the snicking does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the snick does not occur and the jamming does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the coo does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__