that either the supplejack is not a bamboo or it is unselfish or both is not right.
sent1: the twit is selfish if there is something such that it does wrest monohybrid. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a bamboo and it is a startling does not hold. sent3: either the supplejack is not a bamboo or it is unselfish or both if the twit is not unselfish. sent4: the fact that the twit is selfish is right if there exists something such that the fact that it does startle and it does not wrest monohybrid is false. sent5: that the supplejack is a bamboo and not a startling is false. sent6: that the policyholder is a kind of a Prague and it does jazz supplejack is not true. sent7: the supplejack jazzes spatula. sent8: something does not jazz spatula if it wrests landmass. sent9: either the supplejack jazzes spatula or it is unselfish or both. sent10: if something does not jazz spatula then that it is not a kind of a bamboo and/or is unselfish is false. sent11: the policyholder does jazz spatula. sent12: that the supplejack does startle but it is not a bamboo is not correct. sent13: The spatula does jazz policyholder. sent14: that if the policyholder does jazz spatula then that the monarch is a startling and does not wrest monohybrid is incorrect is true. sent15: the monarch either wrests monohybrid or is a bamboo or both if the supplejack is not a bamboo. sent16: the fact that the monarch is selfish is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it jazzes spatula and it does not wrest monohybrid is not correct.
sent14 & sent11 -> int1: that the monarch startles but it does not wrest monohybrid does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a startling and it does not wrest monohybrid is false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the twit is selfish.; sent3 & int3 -> hypothesis;
that either the supplejack is not a kind of a bamboo or it is unselfish or both does not hold.
sent10 -> int4: if the supplejack does not jazz spatula that either it is not a bamboo or it is unselfish or both does not hold.; sent8 -> int5: the supplejack does not jazz spatula if it does wrest landmass.;
$hypothesis$ = that either the supplejack is not a bamboo or it is unselfish or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the twit is selfish if there is something such that it does wrest monohybrid. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a bamboo and it is a startling does not hold. sent3: either the supplejack is not a bamboo or it is unselfish or both if the twit is not unselfish. sent4: the fact that the twit is selfish is right if there exists something such that the fact that it does startle and it does not wrest monohybrid is false. sent5: that the supplejack is a bamboo and not a startling is false. sent6: that the policyholder is a kind of a Prague and it does jazz supplejack is not true. sent7: the supplejack jazzes spatula. sent8: something does not jazz spatula if it wrests landmass. sent9: either the supplejack jazzes spatula or it is unselfish or both. sent10: if something does not jazz spatula then that it is not a kind of a bamboo and/or is unselfish is false. sent11: the policyholder does jazz spatula. sent12: that the supplejack does startle but it is not a bamboo is not correct. sent13: The spatula does jazz policyholder. sent14: that if the policyholder does jazz spatula then that the monarch is a startling and does not wrest monohybrid is incorrect is true. sent15: the monarch either wrests monohybrid or is a bamboo or both if the supplejack is not a bamboo. sent16: the fact that the monarch is selfish is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it jazzes spatula and it does not wrest monohybrid is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent11 -> int1: that the monarch startles but it does not wrest monohybrid does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a startling and it does not wrest monohybrid is false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the twit is selfish.; sent3 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__