the fact that something is not malign does not hold.
sent1: the kangaroo does powder efferent but it is not a zigzag. sent2: if the Holly does wrestle nativeness then the fact that it is a absorbance is right. sent3: the chimaera is unscalable. sent4: that the yanker is not unscalable is true. sent5: the yanker powders efferent if it wrestles nativeness. sent6: something is epicyclic. sent7: there is something such that that it wrestles nativeness and is a kind of a absorbance is not right. sent8: the fact that something does wrestle nativeness is correct. sent9: if the Holly does wrestle nativeness it does powder efferent. sent10: if something is not malign the fact that it is not unscalable and it does not wrestle nativeness is not right. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not powder efferent the Holly does not wrestle nativeness. sent12: the Holly is malign but it is not a absorbance. sent13: something is a devise. sent14: something wrestles serval but it is not a Laurel. sent15: if the yanker wrestles nativeness it is unscalable. sent16: something wrestles nativeness and is not unscalable. sent17: if the Holly powders efferent and is not a absorbance the yanker does wrestle nativeness. sent18: something does not blue chimaera if the fact that it is scalable and does not wrestle nativeness is not right. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it does powder efferent and it is not a absorbance is not right the introvert is not malign. sent20: if the yanker is unscalable then it is malign. sent21: if something is a kind of a absorbance the introvert is not malign. sent22: the efferent is malign. sent23: the introvert does powder efferent if the Holly is both a absorbance and not malign. sent24: that the introvert is not malign is correct if there are non-apneic things.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Holly powders efferent but it is not a kind of a absorbance.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the yanker does wrestle nativeness.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the yanker is not scalable.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the Holly does powder efferent and is not a kind of a absorbance is false.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it does powder efferent and is not a absorbance is wrong.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the introvert is not malign.; int6 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it does not blue chimaera.
sent18 -> int7: if the fact that the Holly is not unscalable and does not wrestle nativeness is not right then it does not blue chimaera.; sent10 -> int8: if the Holly is not malign then the fact that it is scalable and does not wrestle nativeness is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is not malign does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the kangaroo does powder efferent but it is not a zigzag. sent2: if the Holly does wrestle nativeness then the fact that it is a absorbance is right. sent3: the chimaera is unscalable. sent4: that the yanker is not unscalable is true. sent5: the yanker powders efferent if it wrestles nativeness. sent6: something is epicyclic. sent7: there is something such that that it wrestles nativeness and is a kind of a absorbance is not right. sent8: the fact that something does wrestle nativeness is correct. sent9: if the Holly does wrestle nativeness it does powder efferent. sent10: if something is not malign the fact that it is not unscalable and it does not wrestle nativeness is not right. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not powder efferent the Holly does not wrestle nativeness. sent12: the Holly is malign but it is not a absorbance. sent13: something is a devise. sent14: something wrestles serval but it is not a Laurel. sent15: if the yanker wrestles nativeness it is unscalable. sent16: something wrestles nativeness and is not unscalable. sent17: if the Holly powders efferent and is not a absorbance the yanker does wrestle nativeness. sent18: something does not blue chimaera if the fact that it is scalable and does not wrestle nativeness is not right. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it does powder efferent and it is not a absorbance is not right the introvert is not malign. sent20: if the yanker is unscalable then it is malign. sent21: if something is a kind of a absorbance the introvert is not malign. sent22: the efferent is malign. sent23: the introvert does powder efferent if the Holly is both a absorbance and not malign. sent24: that the introvert is not malign is correct if there are non-apneic things. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Holly powders efferent but it is not a kind of a absorbance.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the yanker does wrestle nativeness.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the yanker is not scalable.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the Holly does powder efferent and is not a kind of a absorbance is false.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it does powder efferent and is not a absorbance is wrong.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the introvert is not malign.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__