the endosperm is a breed.
sent1: the doeskin is antrorse if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a XXX and is multivalent is not right. sent2: if the manubrium is equivocal but it is not a kind of a Ceratopogonidae the pinworm is not a kind of a miniaturization. sent3: if that the conservatory is either a robalo or a Fresno or both does not hold the doeskin does not fabricate purposefulness. sent4: if the doeskin is a kind of a miniaturization then the endosperm does breed. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a XXX and is multivalent. sent6: something does not quarantine ovule but it is a Arius. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a breed then the endosperm is multivalent. sent8: if something is not biauricular or not non-antrorse or both that it is a miniaturization is not wrong. sent9: if either the licenser is Belgian or it is tortious or both the conservatory is not tortious. sent10: the licenser is Belgian and/or not non-tortious. sent11: the fact that the pinworm is not biauricular but it is homeostatic is not true. sent12: if something is not biauricular but it is antrorse then the fact that it is not a XXX is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the manubrium is not a kind of a XXX but it is multivalent does not hold if the pinworm is not homeostatic. sent14: the fact that something either is a kind of a robalo or is a Fresno or both is wrong if it is not tortious. sent15: if something is not biauricular then it is a miniaturization. sent16: the manubrium is a kind of equivocal thing that is not a Ceratopogonidae if the doeskin does not fabricate purposefulness. sent17: if something that does not quarantine ovule is a kind of a Arius the pinworm is not homeostatic. sent18: that the doeskin is antrorse hold if there is something such that it is a kind of a XXX. sent19: the fact that something is not homeostatic and it is not multivalent is not correct if it is not a XXX.
sent6 & sent17 -> int1: that the pinworm is not homeostatic is not wrong.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the manubrium is not a kind of a XXX but it is multivalent does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a XXX and it is multivalent is wrong.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the doeskin is antrorse.; int4 -> int5: the doeskin is not biauricular and/or is antrorse.; sent8 -> int6: the doeskin is a miniaturization if it is not biauricular or it is antrorse or both.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the doeskin is a miniaturization.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the endosperm is not a breed hold.
sent19 -> int8: that the pinworm is not homeostatic and is non-multivalent is not true if it is not a XXX.; sent12 -> int9: the pinworm is not a XXX if that it is not biauricular but antrorse hold.; sent14 -> int10: if the conservatory is not tortious then that it is a robalo and/or is a Fresno does not hold.; sent9 & sent10 -> int11: the conservatory is not tortious.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the conservatory is a robalo or it is a Fresno or both does not hold.; sent3 & int12 -> int13: the doeskin does not fabricate purposefulness.; sent16 & int13 -> int14: the manubrium is both equivocal and not a Ceratopogonidae.; sent2 & int14 -> int15: the pinworm is not a kind of a miniaturization.;
$hypothesis$ = the endosperm is a breed. ; $context$ = sent1: the doeskin is antrorse if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a XXX and is multivalent is not right. sent2: if the manubrium is equivocal but it is not a kind of a Ceratopogonidae the pinworm is not a kind of a miniaturization. sent3: if that the conservatory is either a robalo or a Fresno or both does not hold the doeskin does not fabricate purposefulness. sent4: if the doeskin is a kind of a miniaturization then the endosperm does breed. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a XXX and is multivalent. sent6: something does not quarantine ovule but it is a Arius. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a breed then the endosperm is multivalent. sent8: if something is not biauricular or not non-antrorse or both that it is a miniaturization is not wrong. sent9: if either the licenser is Belgian or it is tortious or both the conservatory is not tortious. sent10: the licenser is Belgian and/or not non-tortious. sent11: the fact that the pinworm is not biauricular but it is homeostatic is not true. sent12: if something is not biauricular but it is antrorse then the fact that it is not a XXX is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the manubrium is not a kind of a XXX but it is multivalent does not hold if the pinworm is not homeostatic. sent14: the fact that something either is a kind of a robalo or is a Fresno or both is wrong if it is not tortious. sent15: if something is not biauricular then it is a miniaturization. sent16: the manubrium is a kind of equivocal thing that is not a Ceratopogonidae if the doeskin does not fabricate purposefulness. sent17: if something that does not quarantine ovule is a kind of a Arius the pinworm is not homeostatic. sent18: that the doeskin is antrorse hold if there is something such that it is a kind of a XXX. sent19: the fact that something is not homeostatic and it is not multivalent is not correct if it is not a XXX. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent17 -> int1: that the pinworm is not homeostatic is not wrong.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the manubrium is not a kind of a XXX but it is multivalent does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a XXX and it is multivalent is wrong.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the doeskin is antrorse.; int4 -> int5: the doeskin is not biauricular and/or is antrorse.; sent8 -> int6: the doeskin is a miniaturization if it is not biauricular or it is antrorse or both.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the doeskin is a miniaturization.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__