there is something such that if it is not a categorem it does not dissemble rhodolite.
sent1: if there is something such that it is not a liquidation then the owl is not air-to-air and/or is not a sulky. sent2: that the lanai is not a categorem and is not a reflation is false. sent3: if the stowage is a kind of a Adelie it is not aphakic. sent4: the owl does not dissemble rhodolite if that it is not inconsistent and it is not a aphakic is incorrect. sent5: that that the owl is consistent thing that is non-aphakic is false if the owl is not a categorem hold. sent6: the owl is incontinent if it is not a categorem. sent7: something that does dissemble rhodolite is a kind of a Christian. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a liquidation. sent9: the rover is not a kind of a categorem. sent10: the owl is not inflexible if that it is not inconsistent is right. sent11: there is something such that if it is a laryngospasm it is not a triumvirate. sent12: something dissembles rhodolite and absorbs if that it is a kind of a sulky is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a categorem it is not inconsistent. sent14: the owl dissembles rhodolite if that it is not inconsistent and it is not a aphakic is not true. sent15: there exists something such that if it is inconsistent then it is not a aphakic. sent16: something is not a shove but it is a categorem if it is a kind of a bottler. sent17: the owl does not dissemble rhodolite if it is pro-life. sent18: if the apologist is not heteroecious then it is a categorem. sent19: the millet is not Christian if the owl is a kind of Christian a categorem. sent20: the owl is not a sulky if it is either not air-to-air or not a sulky or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the owl is not a categorem.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that that the owl is not inconsistent and it is not a kind of a aphakic is not wrong is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the owl does not dissemble rhodolite.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the owl is not a categorem then it does not dissemble rhodolite.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the millet is not a kind of a Christian.
sent12 -> int4: the owl dissembles rhodolite and does absorb if it is not a sulky.; sent1 & sent8 -> int5: either the owl is non-air-to-air or it is not a sulky or both.; sent20 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the owl is not a sulky is right.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the owl dissembles rhodolite and it absorbs.; int7 -> int8: the owl dissembles rhodolite.; sent7 -> int9: the owl is a kind of a Christian if it does dissemble rhodolite.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the owl is a Christian.; sent16 -> int11: if the journal is a kind of a bottler then it is both not a shove and a categorem.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a categorem it does not dissemble rhodolite. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a liquidation then the owl is not air-to-air and/or is not a sulky. sent2: that the lanai is not a categorem and is not a reflation is false. sent3: if the stowage is a kind of a Adelie it is not aphakic. sent4: the owl does not dissemble rhodolite if that it is not inconsistent and it is not a aphakic is incorrect. sent5: that that the owl is consistent thing that is non-aphakic is false if the owl is not a categorem hold. sent6: the owl is incontinent if it is not a categorem. sent7: something that does dissemble rhodolite is a kind of a Christian. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a liquidation. sent9: the rover is not a kind of a categorem. sent10: the owl is not inflexible if that it is not inconsistent is right. sent11: there is something such that if it is a laryngospasm it is not a triumvirate. sent12: something dissembles rhodolite and absorbs if that it is a kind of a sulky is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a categorem it is not inconsistent. sent14: the owl dissembles rhodolite if that it is not inconsistent and it is not a aphakic is not true. sent15: there exists something such that if it is inconsistent then it is not a aphakic. sent16: something is not a shove but it is a categorem if it is a kind of a bottler. sent17: the owl does not dissemble rhodolite if it is pro-life. sent18: if the apologist is not heteroecious then it is a categorem. sent19: the millet is not Christian if the owl is a kind of Christian a categorem. sent20: the owl is not a sulky if it is either not air-to-air or not a sulky or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the owl is not a categorem.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that that the owl is not inconsistent and it is not a kind of a aphakic is not wrong is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the owl does not dissemble rhodolite.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the owl is not a categorem then it does not dissemble rhodolite.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__