if the frazzling occurs not the Hispanicness but the redounding occurs.
sent1: the biblioticsness happens. sent2: the unprofitableness does not occur and/or the confiscation does not occur. sent3: the unrighteousness occurs. sent4: if the adhering Tachyglossus does not occur and the corticalness does not occur then the fact that the Hispanicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: if the fretting Chamaeleon occurs then that the unrighteousness but not the plunderage occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the cross-pliness occurs the plasma occurs. sent7: that the costalness does not occur brings about that the fretting Chamaeleon and the particularisticness happens. sent8: that the thromboembolism occurs and the cross-pliness occurs is caused by the non-newsness. sent9: if the frazzle does not occur and the Hispanic does not occur the paradigmaticness occurs. sent10: if the plunderage occurs then the fact that the redounding occurs is correct. sent11: that that the frazzle occurs results in that the adhering Tachyglossus does not occur and the corticalness does not occur is right. sent12: the Hispanic does not occur if not the adhering Tachyglossus but the corticalness happens. sent13: the chauffeur does not occur. sent14: if the unrighteousness happens the plunderage happens. sent15: the corticalness does not occur if the frazzle occurs. sent16: that the costalness does not occur is brought about by that not the exulting but the plasma happens. sent17: the corticalness does not occur. sent18: if that the chauffeur does not occur is not false the exulting does not occur and the shooing gloom happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the frazzling happens is true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the adhering Tachyglossus does not occur and the corticalness does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Hispanicness does not occur.; sent14 & sent3 -> int3: the plunderage occurs.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the redounding occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the non-Hispanicness and the redounding occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the paradigmaticness occurs is not false.
sent18 & sent13 -> int6: the exulting does not occur but the shooing gloom happens.; int6 -> int7: the exulting does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = if the frazzling occurs not the Hispanicness but the redounding occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the biblioticsness happens. sent2: the unprofitableness does not occur and/or the confiscation does not occur. sent3: the unrighteousness occurs. sent4: if the adhering Tachyglossus does not occur and the corticalness does not occur then the fact that the Hispanicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: if the fretting Chamaeleon occurs then that the unrighteousness but not the plunderage occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the cross-pliness occurs the plasma occurs. sent7: that the costalness does not occur brings about that the fretting Chamaeleon and the particularisticness happens. sent8: that the thromboembolism occurs and the cross-pliness occurs is caused by the non-newsness. sent9: if the frazzle does not occur and the Hispanic does not occur the paradigmaticness occurs. sent10: if the plunderage occurs then the fact that the redounding occurs is correct. sent11: that that the frazzle occurs results in that the adhering Tachyglossus does not occur and the corticalness does not occur is right. sent12: the Hispanic does not occur if not the adhering Tachyglossus but the corticalness happens. sent13: the chauffeur does not occur. sent14: if the unrighteousness happens the plunderage happens. sent15: the corticalness does not occur if the frazzle occurs. sent16: that the costalness does not occur is brought about by that not the exulting but the plasma happens. sent17: the corticalness does not occur. sent18: if that the chauffeur does not occur is not false the exulting does not occur and the shooing gloom happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the frazzling happens is true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the adhering Tachyglossus does not occur and the corticalness does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Hispanicness does not occur.; sent14 & sent3 -> int3: the plunderage occurs.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the redounding occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the non-Hispanicness and the redounding occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__