there exists something such that if it spams then it is not a telescope and it is a kind of a compaction.
sent1: there is something such that if it bubbles vow then it does not bubble doubling and it spiels aviator. sent2: there exists something such that if it spiels Wittgenstein then it is not a kind of a camp and it does lodge. sent3: there exists something such that if it does bubble Skopje then it does spiel Hausa and it is a kind of a mend. sent4: if that the clarion is a kind of a spam is right it is not a kind of a telescope and it is a kind of a compaction. sent5: if the clarion is a kind of a compaction it is abiogenetic and it is a kind of a thalidomide. sent6: there is something such that if it rubrics it is not nonexploratory and is a kind of a cleared. sent7: if the damascene is ferric then it is a telescope. sent8: there is something such that if it is a theatrical then it is starchy. sent9: there is something such that if it is ferric then it is not a look and it is aponeurotic. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a brassie it does spiel haircare and it is negligent. sent11: the clarion is a compaction if it is a kind of a spam. sent12: there exists something such that if it is numeric it is not inglorious. sent13: there exists something such that if it is operatic then it is a Pennisetum and it does unwrap digestive. sent14: that there is something such that if it is a sneezewort then that it bubbles vow is not wrong hold. sent15: if something sidetracks it is non-phosphorous thing that does spiel aviator.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
the digestive is not phosphorous and does spiel aviator if it sidetracks.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it spams then it is not a telescope and it is a kind of a compaction. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it bubbles vow then it does not bubble doubling and it spiels aviator. sent2: there exists something such that if it spiels Wittgenstein then it is not a kind of a camp and it does lodge. sent3: there exists something such that if it does bubble Skopje then it does spiel Hausa and it is a kind of a mend. sent4: if that the clarion is a kind of a spam is right it is not a kind of a telescope and it is a kind of a compaction. sent5: if the clarion is a kind of a compaction it is abiogenetic and it is a kind of a thalidomide. sent6: there is something such that if it rubrics it is not nonexploratory and is a kind of a cleared. sent7: if the damascene is ferric then it is a telescope. sent8: there is something such that if it is a theatrical then it is starchy. sent9: there is something such that if it is ferric then it is not a look and it is aponeurotic. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a brassie it does spiel haircare and it is negligent. sent11: the clarion is a compaction if it is a kind of a spam. sent12: there exists something such that if it is numeric it is not inglorious. sent13: there exists something such that if it is operatic then it is a Pennisetum and it does unwrap digestive. sent14: that there is something such that if it is a sneezewort then that it bubbles vow is not wrong hold. sent15: if something sidetracks it is non-phosphorous thing that does spiel aviator. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__