the strengthening happens if the teasing Steinem occurs.
sent1: if the featherbeding occurs the catcher occurs. sent2: the immobilization occurs. sent3: the teasing biomass does not occur. sent4: the unsoldness does not occur. sent5: that the acculturationalness but not the unbending speculator happens leads to the non-Chileanness. sent6: the offering Sillaginidae does not occur if the uncharitableness does not occur. sent7: the unpublishableness occurs if the fact that the offering Sillaginidae occurs does not hold. sent8: that the uncharitableness does not occur is not wrong. sent9: that not the convoying Conospermum but the reviewing happens is false. sent10: the attachment does not occur. sent11: the fact that the convoying Conospermum but not the review happens is false. sent12: the fact that the brutalization occurs is not false. sent13: the radiopacity does not occur. sent14: the fact that the monetization occurs hold. sent15: that the doctoralness does not occur and the bowing does not occur results in that the alligatoring does not occur. sent16: that the normotensiveness occurs hold. sent17: if the convoying Conospermum does not occur and the review happens then the teasing Steinem does not occur. sent18: that the pleochroicness does not occur is true if that the convoying Conospermum does not occur and the review does not occur is not correct. sent19: if the convoying Conospermum does not occur and the reviewing does not occur the teasing Steinem occurs. sent20: the splurging happens. sent21: if the unpublishableness but not the pleochroicness happens the strengthening happens. sent22: the scopalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the convoying Conospermum does not occur and the reviewing does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the teasing Steinem happens.; sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the offering Sillaginidae does not occur.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the unpublishableness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the strengthening happens if the teasing Steinem occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the featherbeding occurs the catcher occurs. sent2: the immobilization occurs. sent3: the teasing biomass does not occur. sent4: the unsoldness does not occur. sent5: that the acculturationalness but not the unbending speculator happens leads to the non-Chileanness. sent6: the offering Sillaginidae does not occur if the uncharitableness does not occur. sent7: the unpublishableness occurs if the fact that the offering Sillaginidae occurs does not hold. sent8: that the uncharitableness does not occur is not wrong. sent9: that not the convoying Conospermum but the reviewing happens is false. sent10: the attachment does not occur. sent11: the fact that the convoying Conospermum but not the review happens is false. sent12: the fact that the brutalization occurs is not false. sent13: the radiopacity does not occur. sent14: the fact that the monetization occurs hold. sent15: that the doctoralness does not occur and the bowing does not occur results in that the alligatoring does not occur. sent16: that the normotensiveness occurs hold. sent17: if the convoying Conospermum does not occur and the review happens then the teasing Steinem does not occur. sent18: that the pleochroicness does not occur is true if that the convoying Conospermum does not occur and the review does not occur is not correct. sent19: if the convoying Conospermum does not occur and the reviewing does not occur the teasing Steinem occurs. sent20: the splurging happens. sent21: if the unpublishableness but not the pleochroicness happens the strengthening happens. sent22: the scopalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the convoying Conospermum does not occur and the reviewing does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the teasing Steinem happens.; sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the offering Sillaginidae does not occur.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the unpublishableness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__