that if the autographicness occurs the demineralizing clavicle does not occur but the dissuasiveness happens does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the unprovocativeness does not occur is correct. sent2: that the autographicness does not occur is prevented by that the rigging occurs and the demineralizing clavicle happens. sent3: the dissuasiveness occurs if the cotillion does not occur. sent4: the demineralizing extraneousness is prevented by either that the demineralizing clavicle happens or that the demineralizing extraneousness does not occur or both. sent5: the dissuasiveness does not occur if either the dissuasiveness does not occur or the broiling does not occur or both. sent6: the allopatricness does not occur. sent7: that either the awfulness happens or the chancing Dyirbal does not occur or both is triggered by that the allopatricness does not occur. sent8: that the cotillion does not occur is caused by that the broiling occurs. sent9: the chancing poignance does not occur. sent10: the rigging occurs. sent11: the broil occurs if that the chancing Dyirbal does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the reexamination does not occur. sent13: that the awfulness occurs or the chancing Dyirbal does not occur or both triggers that the broiling occurs. sent14: if the rigging does not occur either the demineralizing clavicle happens or the demineralizing extraneousness does not occur or both. sent15: if both the rigging and the demineralizing clavicle occurs the autographicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demineralizing clavicle happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the rigging happens and the demineralizing clavicle occurs.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the autographicness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the autographicness occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the demineralizing clavicle does not occur.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: either the awfulness occurs or the chancing Dyirbal does not occur or both.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the broil occurs.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the cotillion does not occur.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the dissuasiveness happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the demineralizing clavicle does not occur and the dissuasiveness occurs.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the demineralizing extraneousness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that if the autographicness occurs the demineralizing clavicle does not occur but the dissuasiveness happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the unprovocativeness does not occur is correct. sent2: that the autographicness does not occur is prevented by that the rigging occurs and the demineralizing clavicle happens. sent3: the dissuasiveness occurs if the cotillion does not occur. sent4: the demineralizing extraneousness is prevented by either that the demineralizing clavicle happens or that the demineralizing extraneousness does not occur or both. sent5: the dissuasiveness does not occur if either the dissuasiveness does not occur or the broiling does not occur or both. sent6: the allopatricness does not occur. sent7: that either the awfulness happens or the chancing Dyirbal does not occur or both is triggered by that the allopatricness does not occur. sent8: that the cotillion does not occur is caused by that the broiling occurs. sent9: the chancing poignance does not occur. sent10: the rigging occurs. sent11: the broil occurs if that the chancing Dyirbal does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the reexamination does not occur. sent13: that the awfulness occurs or the chancing Dyirbal does not occur or both triggers that the broiling occurs. sent14: if the rigging does not occur either the demineralizing clavicle happens or the demineralizing extraneousness does not occur or both. sent15: if both the rigging and the demineralizing clavicle occurs the autographicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demineralizing clavicle happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the rigging happens and the demineralizing clavicle occurs.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the autographicness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the autographicness occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the demineralizing clavicle does not occur.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: either the awfulness occurs or the chancing Dyirbal does not occur or both.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the broil occurs.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the cotillion does not occur.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the dissuasiveness happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the demineralizing clavicle does not occur and the dissuasiveness occurs.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__