that there exists something such that if it does bow incapacity then it is a apophatism is not incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the mirage is untruthful hold if it tampers. sent2: the mirage is unsociable if it is a promoter. sent3: there is something such that if it is a pennoncel then it is zodiacal. sent4: the mirage bows axerophthol if the fact that it is a apophatism is not false. sent5: the mirage is a kind of a applejack if it does upgrade toe-in. sent6: that there is something such that if it does bow cameo it is a stager is not wrong. sent7: if the mirage advises the fact that it is a pennoncel is correct. sent8: something is a kind of a tufa if it is a kind of a apophatism. sent9: if the osmund is a apophatism then it is a disengagement. sent10: something is a apophatism if it is untruthful. sent11: the mirage is untruthful if it bows incapacity. sent12: the drinking does bow incapacity. sent13: something does bow hysteric if the fact that it is a kind of a rail hold. sent14: the mirage bows pantheist. sent15: something bows nursing if it is a kind of a thelarche.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mirage does bow incapacity.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the mirage is untruthful is true.; sent10 -> int2: the mirage is a apophatism if it is untruthful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mirage is a apophatism.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the mirage is a apophatism is not incorrect if that it bows incapacity is true.; int4 -> hypothesis;
if the drinking is a apophatism then it is a kind of a tufa.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does bow incapacity then it is a apophatism is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mirage is untruthful hold if it tampers. sent2: the mirage is unsociable if it is a promoter. sent3: there is something such that if it is a pennoncel then it is zodiacal. sent4: the mirage bows axerophthol if the fact that it is a apophatism is not false. sent5: the mirage is a kind of a applejack if it does upgrade toe-in. sent6: that there is something such that if it does bow cameo it is a stager is not wrong. sent7: if the mirage advises the fact that it is a pennoncel is correct. sent8: something is a kind of a tufa if it is a kind of a apophatism. sent9: if the osmund is a apophatism then it is a disengagement. sent10: something is a apophatism if it is untruthful. sent11: the mirage is untruthful if it bows incapacity. sent12: the drinking does bow incapacity. sent13: something does bow hysteric if the fact that it is a kind of a rail hold. sent14: the mirage bows pantheist. sent15: something bows nursing if it is a kind of a thelarche. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mirage does bow incapacity.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the mirage is untruthful is true.; sent10 -> int2: the mirage is a apophatism if it is untruthful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mirage is a apophatism.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the mirage is a apophatism is not incorrect if that it bows incapacity is true.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__