the invertebrate is ineligible.
sent1: something does not mound Ashur but it desexualizes inhaler if it is not identifiable. sent2: the fact that the invertebrate does not desexualize campus and is identifiable does not hold if it is instrumental. sent3: the fact that something is not ineligible if that it does desexualize inhaler and it urticates abvolt does not hold hold. sent4: if the campus urticates abvolt then the dimmer is a Humulus. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is unidentifiable and it is a kind of a Humulus is right is not true then the fact that the dimmer is not a Humulus is not wrong. sent6: there exists something such that that it is not identifiable and it is a Humulus is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the invertebrate desexualizes inhaler and does urticate abvolt does not hold if the campus does not urticate abvolt. sent8: that something is not ineligible but it urticates abvolt does not hold if it is not a kind of a Humulus. sent9: if the fact that the campus is a kind of eligible thing that urticates abvolt is not right then the know-it-all is not eligible. sent10: the fact that the invertebrate is instrumental is correct. sent11: if there is something such that that it is both not ineligible and clayey does not hold the esthete is not clayey.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the campus does urticate abvolt.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the dimmer is a Humulus.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: the dimmer is not a Humulus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the campus does not urticate abvolt.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the invertebrate desexualizes inhaler and does urticate abvolt does not hold.; sent3 -> int6: if that the invertebrate desexualizes inhaler and it urticates abvolt is incorrect then it is not ineligible.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the know-it-all is not ineligible.
sent8 -> int7: if the campus is not a Humulus the fact that that it is not ineligible and it urticates abvolt is not incorrect is not true.; sent1 -> int8: the dimmer does not mound Ashur and does desexualize inhaler if it is not identifiable.; sent2 & sent10 -> int9: the fact that the invertebrate does not desexualize campus but it is not unidentifiable does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it does not desexualize campus and is identifiable does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the invertebrate is ineligible. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not mound Ashur but it desexualizes inhaler if it is not identifiable. sent2: the fact that the invertebrate does not desexualize campus and is identifiable does not hold if it is instrumental. sent3: the fact that something is not ineligible if that it does desexualize inhaler and it urticates abvolt does not hold hold. sent4: if the campus urticates abvolt then the dimmer is a Humulus. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is unidentifiable and it is a kind of a Humulus is right is not true then the fact that the dimmer is not a Humulus is not wrong. sent6: there exists something such that that it is not identifiable and it is a Humulus is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the invertebrate desexualizes inhaler and does urticate abvolt does not hold if the campus does not urticate abvolt. sent8: that something is not ineligible but it urticates abvolt does not hold if it is not a kind of a Humulus. sent9: if the fact that the campus is a kind of eligible thing that urticates abvolt is not right then the know-it-all is not eligible. sent10: the fact that the invertebrate is instrumental is correct. sent11: if there is something such that that it is both not ineligible and clayey does not hold the esthete is not clayey. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the campus does urticate abvolt.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the dimmer is a Humulus.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: the dimmer is not a Humulus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the campus does not urticate abvolt.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the invertebrate desexualizes inhaler and does urticate abvolt does not hold.; sent3 -> int6: if that the invertebrate desexualizes inhaler and it urticates abvolt is incorrect then it is not ineligible.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__