the fact that the Rice is a kind of a contraception that is not a volleyball is not right.
sent1: if there is something such that that it is not a seckel is not false the bleachers is not an acknowledgment and it is not federal. sent2: the fact that something is a contraception that is not a volleyball is wrong if it is federal. sent3: the fact that the snowboarder is not a seckel is right. sent4: everything is callithumpian. sent5: that the snowboarder is a kind of a Turkmen and it is a dancing is not right. sent6: if something is a kind of a volleyball then the glaze infiltrates and is not a device. sent7: that something is both not difficult and not callithumpian is right if it is a kind of a volleyball. sent8: if the butty is not a volleyball the Rice is a contraception but it is not a volleyball.
sent7 -> int1: the butty is non-difficult and it is not callithumpian if it is a volleyball.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the butty is a volleyball.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the butty is not difficult and it is not callithumpian.; int2 -> int3: the butty is not callithumpian.; sent4 -> int4: the butty is callithumpian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the butty is not a kind of a volleyball.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the Rice is a contraception but it is not a volleyball is wrong hold.
sent2 -> int7: if the Rice is federal then that it is a kind of a contraception that is not a volleyball is incorrect.; sent5 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Turkmen and a dancing does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Rice is a kind of a contraception that is not a volleyball is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is not a seckel is not false the bleachers is not an acknowledgment and it is not federal. sent2: the fact that something is a contraception that is not a volleyball is wrong if it is federal. sent3: the fact that the snowboarder is not a seckel is right. sent4: everything is callithumpian. sent5: that the snowboarder is a kind of a Turkmen and it is a dancing is not right. sent6: if something is a kind of a volleyball then the glaze infiltrates and is not a device. sent7: that something is both not difficult and not callithumpian is right if it is a kind of a volleyball. sent8: if the butty is not a volleyball the Rice is a contraception but it is not a volleyball. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the butty is non-difficult and it is not callithumpian if it is a volleyball.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the butty is a volleyball.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the butty is not difficult and it is not callithumpian.; int2 -> int3: the butty is not callithumpian.; sent4 -> int4: the butty is callithumpian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the butty is not a kind of a volleyball.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__