the thill is mandibular.
sent1: something is not quarterly if it is a kind of a cuirass that does fine-tune. sent2: if something that is not a kind of a Rus is packable then it is a kind of a cuirass. sent3: that the thill is both a downcast and not an extrapolation does not hold if it does not extinguish. sent4: everything is not lovable. sent5: the thill is a cuirass if it does not fine-tune. sent6: something is a kind of a camel but it is not dysplastic. sent7: the thill is mandibular if it extinguishes. sent8: the thill is a kind of an audiovisual. sent9: the thill does extinguish if there is something such that that it is both a camel and not dysplastic is wrong. sent10: if something is not an episteme and not a conflict it is not a cuff. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a camel that is not dysplastic does not hold. sent12: something that is not lovable is both not a Rus and packable. sent13: if the thill is a kind of a Rus then the fact that it does not fine-tune is right. sent14: the blotter is mandibular. sent15: if the Punjabi eliminates but it is not a vandalism then the inhibition fine-tunes. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a camel and dysplastic does not hold. sent17: the fact that that something extinguishes and it is mandibular is not incorrect is false if it is not a quarterly. sent18: the fact that the thill does extinguish is not false if there exists something such that it is dysplastic. sent19: the Punjabi eliminates but it is not a kind of a vandalism if it is not a cuff. sent20: there exists something such that it is a spud. sent21: there exists something such that it is a kind of mandibular thing that does not extinguish. sent22: the Punjabi is not an episteme and does not conflict if there exists something such that it is a spud.
sent11 & sent9 -> int1: the thill extinguishes.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the thill is not mandibular is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the thill is mandibular. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not quarterly if it is a kind of a cuirass that does fine-tune. sent2: if something that is not a kind of a Rus is packable then it is a kind of a cuirass. sent3: that the thill is both a downcast and not an extrapolation does not hold if it does not extinguish. sent4: everything is not lovable. sent5: the thill is a cuirass if it does not fine-tune. sent6: something is a kind of a camel but it is not dysplastic. sent7: the thill is mandibular if it extinguishes. sent8: the thill is a kind of an audiovisual. sent9: the thill does extinguish if there is something such that that it is both a camel and not dysplastic is wrong. sent10: if something is not an episteme and not a conflict it is not a cuff. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a camel that is not dysplastic does not hold. sent12: something that is not lovable is both not a Rus and packable. sent13: if the thill is a kind of a Rus then the fact that it does not fine-tune is right. sent14: the blotter is mandibular. sent15: if the Punjabi eliminates but it is not a vandalism then the inhibition fine-tunes. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a camel and dysplastic does not hold. sent17: the fact that that something extinguishes and it is mandibular is not incorrect is false if it is not a quarterly. sent18: the fact that the thill does extinguish is not false if there exists something such that it is dysplastic. sent19: the Punjabi eliminates but it is not a kind of a vandalism if it is not a cuff. sent20: there exists something such that it is a spud. sent21: there exists something such that it is a kind of mandibular thing that does not extinguish. sent22: the Punjabi is not an episteme and does not conflict if there exists something such that it is a spud. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent9 -> int1: the thill extinguishes.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__