the fact that the chopstick is diocesan is correct.
sent1: if something that is busy is chelicerous then it does not surmise mammothermography. sent2: if something that is not empiric is not chelicerous the chopstick is a diocesan. sent3: if the trichloride is not chelicerous the yo-yo is both not empiric and not chelicerous. sent4: the trichloride is an italic and it does busy. sent5: the trichloride is a commanding. sent6: the shebeen is an italic. sent7: the trichloride does surmise mammothermography if it does command. sent8: something is not chelicerous.
sent4 -> int1: the trichloride is not non-busy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trichloride is chelicerous.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the trichloride busies and it is chelicerous.; sent1 -> int3: the trichloride does not surmise mammothermography if it busies and it is chelicerous.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the trichloride does not surmise mammothermography.; sent7 & sent5 -> int5: the trichloride does surmise mammothermography.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the trichloride is not chelicerous.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the yo-yo is not empiric and is not chelicerous.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not empiric and it is not chelicerous.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chopstick is diocesan is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is busy is chelicerous then it does not surmise mammothermography. sent2: if something that is not empiric is not chelicerous the chopstick is a diocesan. sent3: if the trichloride is not chelicerous the yo-yo is both not empiric and not chelicerous. sent4: the trichloride is an italic and it does busy. sent5: the trichloride is a commanding. sent6: the shebeen is an italic. sent7: the trichloride does surmise mammothermography if it does command. sent8: something is not chelicerous. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the trichloride is not non-busy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trichloride is chelicerous.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the trichloride busies and it is chelicerous.; sent1 -> int3: the trichloride does not surmise mammothermography if it busies and it is chelicerous.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the trichloride does not surmise mammothermography.; sent7 & sent5 -> int5: the trichloride does surmise mammothermography.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the trichloride is not chelicerous.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the yo-yo is not empiric and is not chelicerous.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not empiric and it is not chelicerous.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__