the fact that the Anchorage is a kind of a atonality if the valine is a kind of a chutzpanik is wrong.
sent1: something is not a kind of an equipment and sympathizes. sent2: the toolmaker does not overheat. sent3: the valine is not a chutzpanik if there exists something such that the fact that it does not sympathize is true. sent4: the melphalan does not assail Liszt and is a tonnage. sent5: the Anchorage is not an awkwardness. sent6: something that does not sympathize and is a kind of a atonality is a kind of a chutzpanik. sent7: if something is not an equipment but it sympathizes the fact that it is a kind of a atonality hold. sent8: the fact that the Anchorage is not an athenaeum and is a Hammerstein is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that that it is an equipment and sympathizes is not correct. sent10: the antipodes is a atonality and it is a chutzpanik if there exists something such that that it is a fascism is not incorrect. sent11: if the horsewoman is a yard then the valine is a fascism but it does not incriminate imaginary. sent12: something incriminates Viperidae and incriminates fomentation if it does not overheat. sent13: the horsewoman is a yard if the idiot assails isochrone. sent14: if there is something such that that it is not a chutzpanik and it is a atonality does not hold the valine is not an equipment. sent15: if the idiot is a yard the horsewoman is a kind of a yard. sent16: something is not basilican if that it is a kind of basilican thing that is not climatic does not hold. sent17: the Anchorage is not a chutzpanik but it sympathizes. sent18: that if there exists something such that the fact that it is not an equipment and sympathizes does not hold then that the valine is a chutzpanik is right hold. sent19: if something does incriminate Viperidae the fact that it is basilican and is not climatic does not hold. sent20: the Anchorage sympathizes. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an equipment and does sympathize is not true the valine is not a kind of a chutzpanik. sent22: if the toolmaker is not basilican then the idiot does assail isochrone and/or it is a kind of a yard.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the Anchorage is not an equipment but it does sympathize is incorrect.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an equipment and does sympathize is false.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the valine is not a chutzpanik.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valine is a chutzpanik.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Anchorage is not a kind of an equipment but it does sympathize.; sent7 -> int5: if the Anchorage is not an equipment but it sympathizes then it is a atonality.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Anchorage is a atonality.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the antipodes is a atonality.
sent16 -> int7: if that the toolmaker is both basilican and not climatic is wrong then it is not basilican.; sent19 -> int8: if the toolmaker does incriminate Viperidae then that it is basilican and is not climatic is incorrect.; sent12 -> int9: if the toolmaker does not overheat it does incriminate Viperidae and it does incriminate fomentation.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the toolmaker does incriminate Viperidae and does incriminate fomentation.; int10 -> int11: the toolmaker does incriminate Viperidae.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the toolmaker is both not non-basilican and non-climatic does not hold.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the toolmaker is not basilican.; sent22 & int13 -> int14: the idiot does assail isochrone or is a yard or both.; int14 & sent13 & sent15 -> int15: that the horsewoman is a yard is not incorrect.; sent11 & int15 -> int16: the valine is a fascism that does not incriminate imaginary.; int16 -> int17: the valine is a fascism.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is a kind of a fascism.; int18 & sent10 -> int19: the antipodes is a atonality and it is a chutzpanik.; int19 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Anchorage is a kind of a atonality if the valine is a kind of a chutzpanik is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of an equipment and sympathizes. sent2: the toolmaker does not overheat. sent3: the valine is not a chutzpanik if there exists something such that the fact that it does not sympathize is true. sent4: the melphalan does not assail Liszt and is a tonnage. sent5: the Anchorage is not an awkwardness. sent6: something that does not sympathize and is a kind of a atonality is a kind of a chutzpanik. sent7: if something is not an equipment but it sympathizes the fact that it is a kind of a atonality hold. sent8: the fact that the Anchorage is not an athenaeum and is a Hammerstein is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that that it is an equipment and sympathizes is not correct. sent10: the antipodes is a atonality and it is a chutzpanik if there exists something such that that it is a fascism is not incorrect. sent11: if the horsewoman is a yard then the valine is a fascism but it does not incriminate imaginary. sent12: something incriminates Viperidae and incriminates fomentation if it does not overheat. sent13: the horsewoman is a yard if the idiot assails isochrone. sent14: if there is something such that that it is not a chutzpanik and it is a atonality does not hold the valine is not an equipment. sent15: if the idiot is a yard the horsewoman is a kind of a yard. sent16: something is not basilican if that it is a kind of basilican thing that is not climatic does not hold. sent17: the Anchorage is not a chutzpanik but it sympathizes. sent18: that if there exists something such that the fact that it is not an equipment and sympathizes does not hold then that the valine is a chutzpanik is right hold. sent19: if something does incriminate Viperidae the fact that it is basilican and is not climatic does not hold. sent20: the Anchorage sympathizes. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an equipment and does sympathize is not true the valine is not a kind of a chutzpanik. sent22: if the toolmaker is not basilican then the idiot does assail isochrone and/or it is a kind of a yard. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the Anchorage is not an equipment but it does sympathize is incorrect.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an equipment and does sympathize is false.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the valine is not a chutzpanik.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valine is a chutzpanik.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Anchorage is not a kind of an equipment but it does sympathize.; sent7 -> int5: if the Anchorage is not an equipment but it sympathizes then it is a atonality.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Anchorage is a atonality.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__