the sard does not criticize dekaliter.
sent1: everything is a milliard and/or does glower. sent2: if something is not full-term that it does criticize dekaliter and does not criticize en is true. sent3: something animates if it does magnetize spoonbill or it is not expansionist or both. sent4: the sard is expansionist if the sprinkle is a schmeer. sent5: if something that is not non-full-term is expansionist then it does not criticize dekaliter. sent6: either the sard is flaky or it is a vegetarianism or both if the decumary does criticize en. sent7: if the sprinkle glowers the fact that the decumary is a kind of a schmeer is not wrong. sent8: the sard is not non-flaky and/or it is a vegetarianism. sent9: if the decumary does criticize en the sard is flaky or is not a kind of a vegetarianism or both. sent10: the decumary is a schmeer if the sprinkle is a milliard. sent11: the whaler is not pyrogallic. sent12: the fact that the decumary coaches and it is expansionist if there is something such that it is not pyrogallic hold. sent13: something is full-term if it is flaky and/or is not a vegetarianism. sent14: the sard is full-term if it is not a kind of a vegetarianism. sent15: the fact that the decumary does not criticize en does not hold. sent16: the sprinkle is a schmeer. sent17: The fact that the en does not criticize decumary does not hold.
sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the sard is flaky or it is not a vegetarianism or both.; sent13 -> int2: the fact that the sard is full-term is not incorrect if it is flaky or it is not a vegetarianism or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sard is full-term.; sent4 & sent16 -> int4: the sard is expansionist.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sard is full-term thing that is expansionist.; sent5 -> int6: if the sard is not non-full-term and is expansionist it does not criticize dekaliter.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the sard criticizes dekaliter.
sent2 -> int7: if the sard is not full-term it does criticize dekaliter and does not criticize en.; sent1 -> int8: the sprinkle is a milliard or it glowers or both.; int8 & sent10 & sent7 -> int9: the decumary is a schmeer.; sent11 -> int10: there is something such that it is not pyrogallic.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the decumary is a coach and expansionist.; int11 -> int12: the decumary is expansionist.; int9 & int12 -> int13: the decumary is a schmeer and it is expansionist.; int13 -> int14: something is a kind of a schmeer and it is expansionist.;
$hypothesis$ = the sard does not criticize dekaliter. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is a milliard and/or does glower. sent2: if something is not full-term that it does criticize dekaliter and does not criticize en is true. sent3: something animates if it does magnetize spoonbill or it is not expansionist or both. sent4: the sard is expansionist if the sprinkle is a schmeer. sent5: if something that is not non-full-term is expansionist then it does not criticize dekaliter. sent6: either the sard is flaky or it is a vegetarianism or both if the decumary does criticize en. sent7: if the sprinkle glowers the fact that the decumary is a kind of a schmeer is not wrong. sent8: the sard is not non-flaky and/or it is a vegetarianism. sent9: if the decumary does criticize en the sard is flaky or is not a kind of a vegetarianism or both. sent10: the decumary is a schmeer if the sprinkle is a milliard. sent11: the whaler is not pyrogallic. sent12: the fact that the decumary coaches and it is expansionist if there is something such that it is not pyrogallic hold. sent13: something is full-term if it is flaky and/or is not a vegetarianism. sent14: the sard is full-term if it is not a kind of a vegetarianism. sent15: the fact that the decumary does not criticize en does not hold. sent16: the sprinkle is a schmeer. sent17: The fact that the en does not criticize decumary does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the sard is flaky or it is not a vegetarianism or both.; sent13 -> int2: the fact that the sard is full-term is not incorrect if it is flaky or it is not a vegetarianism or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sard is full-term.; sent4 & sent16 -> int4: the sard is expansionist.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sard is full-term thing that is expansionist.; sent5 -> int6: if the sard is not non-full-term and is expansionist it does not criticize dekaliter.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__