the Prakriticness does not occur.
sent1: the recession does not occur if that the filling leatherjacket does not occur and the pleochroicness occurs is not true. sent2: that the filling leatherjacket does not occur but the pleochroicness occurs is incorrect if the accrediting presidium happens. sent3: the accrediting bosomed happens. sent4: the non-Prakriticness is caused by that the recession happens and/or that the accrediting Zanuck occurs. sent5: if that the accrediting presidium does not occur and the accrediting approver does not occur does not hold then the accrediting presidium happens. sent6: the fact that the accrediting presidium does not occur and the accrediting approver does not occur is not correct if the accrediting caffeine does not occur. sent7: that the accrediting Zanuck does not occur brings about that the accrediting isogamete occurs but the legislativeness does not occur. sent8: if that either the agronomicness occurs or the filibuster occurs or both is false then the accrediting caffeine does not occur. sent9: the grant-in-aid happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accrediting Zanuck does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: both the accrediting isogamete and the non-legislativeness happens.;
the Prakriticness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the Prakriticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the recession does not occur if that the filling leatherjacket does not occur and the pleochroicness occurs is not true. sent2: that the filling leatherjacket does not occur but the pleochroicness occurs is incorrect if the accrediting presidium happens. sent3: the accrediting bosomed happens. sent4: the non-Prakriticness is caused by that the recession happens and/or that the accrediting Zanuck occurs. sent5: if that the accrediting presidium does not occur and the accrediting approver does not occur does not hold then the accrediting presidium happens. sent6: the fact that the accrediting presidium does not occur and the accrediting approver does not occur is not correct if the accrediting caffeine does not occur. sent7: that the accrediting Zanuck does not occur brings about that the accrediting isogamete occurs but the legislativeness does not occur. sent8: if that either the agronomicness occurs or the filibuster occurs or both is false then the accrediting caffeine does not occur. sent9: the grant-in-aid happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accrediting Zanuck does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: both the accrediting isogamete and the non-legislativeness happens.; __UNKNOWN__