the measurer is a kind of a corythosaur.
sent1: that that that something is not holozoic and it is non-bifilar hold does not hold if it is a plowing is true. sent2: if the iguanodon does not reseat then the oospore is not exaugural. sent3: if something is fibrocalcific then the antipruritic does not skim Shina. sent4: if the iguanodon does skim Shina then the fact that the antipruritic is not a kind of a corythosaur and it does not plow is wrong. sent5: if either the iguanodon is interlobular or it does not reseat or both then the oospore is not exaugural. sent6: the measurer does unbar inaudibility if the oospore is not exaugural. sent7: if the oospore does not reseat then the fact that it is interlobular thing that is bifilar does not hold. sent8: the iguanodon is interlobular or it does reseat or both. sent9: the natatorium does not unbar inaudibility but it is carpellary if it does target. sent10: the antipruritic is interlobular. sent11: the natatorium is a target. sent12: that something is not holozoic but it is bifilar does not hold if it does plow. sent13: if the natatorium does not unbar inaudibility but it is carpellary the oospore does not unbar inaudibility. sent14: something is a plowing if it does not skim Shina. sent15: the fact that something is exaugural and it does reseat is not right if it does not unbar inaudibility. sent16: the fact that that the tepee is not fibrocalcific but it skims oospore is incorrect is not false. sent17: if something does unbar inaudibility it is a corythosaur. sent18: if the fact that the antipruritic is a kind of non-holozoic thing that is not bifilar is not true the iguanodon is interlobular. sent19: something does not reseat if that it is exaugural and it reseat does not hold.
sent16 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that that it is not fibrocalcific and it skims oospore is true is incorrect.; sent14 -> int2: if the antipruritic does not skim Shina it does plow.; sent1 -> int3: the fact that the antipruritic is not holozoic but non-bifilar is false if it plows.; sent17 -> int4: if the measurer does unbar inaudibility then the fact that it is a corythosaur is right.;
the measurer is not a kind of a corythosaur.
sent19 -> int5: the fact that the oospore does not reseat is not wrong if that it is exaugural thing that does reseat is not true.; sent15 -> int6: that the oospore is not non-exaugural and it does reseat does not hold if it does not unbar inaudibility.; sent9 & sent11 -> int7: the natatorium does not unbar inaudibility and is carpellary.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the oospore does not unbar inaudibility.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the oospore is exaugural thing that reseats is false.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the oospore does not reseat.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the fact that the oospore is interlobular and is bifilar is incorrect is correct.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not non-interlobular and it is bifilar is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the measurer is a kind of a corythosaur. ; $context$ = sent1: that that that something is not holozoic and it is non-bifilar hold does not hold if it is a plowing is true. sent2: if the iguanodon does not reseat then the oospore is not exaugural. sent3: if something is fibrocalcific then the antipruritic does not skim Shina. sent4: if the iguanodon does skim Shina then the fact that the antipruritic is not a kind of a corythosaur and it does not plow is wrong. sent5: if either the iguanodon is interlobular or it does not reseat or both then the oospore is not exaugural. sent6: the measurer does unbar inaudibility if the oospore is not exaugural. sent7: if the oospore does not reseat then the fact that it is interlobular thing that is bifilar does not hold. sent8: the iguanodon is interlobular or it does reseat or both. sent9: the natatorium does not unbar inaudibility but it is carpellary if it does target. sent10: the antipruritic is interlobular. sent11: the natatorium is a target. sent12: that something is not holozoic but it is bifilar does not hold if it does plow. sent13: if the natatorium does not unbar inaudibility but it is carpellary the oospore does not unbar inaudibility. sent14: something is a plowing if it does not skim Shina. sent15: the fact that something is exaugural and it does reseat is not right if it does not unbar inaudibility. sent16: the fact that that the tepee is not fibrocalcific but it skims oospore is incorrect is not false. sent17: if something does unbar inaudibility it is a corythosaur. sent18: if the fact that the antipruritic is a kind of non-holozoic thing that is not bifilar is not true the iguanodon is interlobular. sent19: something does not reseat if that it is exaugural and it reseat does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that that it is not fibrocalcific and it skims oospore is true is incorrect.; sent14 -> int2: if the antipruritic does not skim Shina it does plow.; sent1 -> int3: the fact that the antipruritic is not holozoic but non-bifilar is false if it plows.; sent17 -> int4: if the measurer does unbar inaudibility then the fact that it is a corythosaur is right.; __UNKNOWN__