the fact that the operculum does mummify vascularization is right.
sent1: everything is not grammatical. sent2: if the fact that the hypochondria is not a patzer and it is not a keyboard does not hold it is full-time. sent3: if the hypochondria is full-time the fact that the aqualung is a paternalism is correct. sent4: the operculum is not non-subdural. sent5: if something is not grammatical it is not a paternalism. sent6: if the hypochondria is subdural then the operculum is subdural. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a patzer is not a keyboard it is subdural. sent8: the operculum is a patzer if it is subdural. sent9: if the hypochondria is subdural then the operculum does not mummify vascularization but it is subdural. sent10: the hypochondria is not a kind of a yawn or is not grammatical or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hypochondria is not a patzer and it is not a keyboard is wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the hypochondria is full-time.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the aqualung is a paternalism.; sent5 -> int3: the aqualung is not a kind of a paternalism if it is not grammatical.; sent1 -> int4: the aqualung is not grammatical.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the aqualung is not a paternalism.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the hypochondria is not a patzer and it is not a kind of a keyboard is right.; sent7 -> int8: if the hypochondria is not a patzer and is not a keyboard then it is subdural.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the hypochondria is subdural.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the operculum does not mummify vascularization and is subdural.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the operculum mummifies vascularization.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the operculum does mummify vascularization is right. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is not grammatical. sent2: if the fact that the hypochondria is not a patzer and it is not a keyboard does not hold it is full-time. sent3: if the hypochondria is full-time the fact that the aqualung is a paternalism is correct. sent4: the operculum is not non-subdural. sent5: if something is not grammatical it is not a paternalism. sent6: if the hypochondria is subdural then the operculum is subdural. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a patzer is not a keyboard it is subdural. sent8: the operculum is a patzer if it is subdural. sent9: if the hypochondria is subdural then the operculum does not mummify vascularization but it is subdural. sent10: the hypochondria is not a kind of a yawn or is not grammatical or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hypochondria is not a patzer and it is not a keyboard is wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the hypochondria is full-time.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the aqualung is a paternalism.; sent5 -> int3: the aqualung is not a kind of a paternalism if it is not grammatical.; sent1 -> int4: the aqualung is not grammatical.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the aqualung is not a paternalism.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the hypochondria is not a patzer and it is not a kind of a keyboard is right.; sent7 -> int8: if the hypochondria is not a patzer and is not a keyboard then it is subdural.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the hypochondria is subdural.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the operculum does not mummify vascularization and is subdural.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__