there exists something such that it is vulnerable and is interstellar.
sent1: the pocketcomb is not a freckled. sent2: The Zapus does not measure pocketcomb. sent3: the pocketcomb is batholithic. sent4: something that does not remonstrate let is not a crankiness. sent5: the caulk is not batholithic if that the electron does not remonstrate microgametophyte but it is a freckled is not right. sent6: the luminescence does not measure Zapus. sent7: if that the luminescence is non-endocrine is not incorrect it does not remonstrate microgametophyte. sent8: if the pocketcomb does not measure Zapus that the electron does not remonstrate microgametophyte but it does freckle is false. sent9: the fact that the pocketcomb is not a kind of a crankiness is true. sent10: the luminescence is vulnerable if the caulk is not batholithic and not a crankiness. sent11: the luminescence is an endocrine. sent12: the electron is a crankiness. sent13: if something is an endocrine then it is interstellar. sent14: the electron is not vulnerable. sent15: the pocketcomb does not measure Zapus. sent16: there exists something such that it is interstellar. sent17: something is vulnerable. sent18: if the electron does not freckle the caulk is not batholithic. sent19: the pocketcomb does not remonstrate let if the caulk does measure Zapus. sent20: the electron is not interstellar if the luminescence remonstrates microgametophyte. sent21: the caulk does not include. sent22: the luminescence does not include. sent23: the caulk does not include and does not remonstrate let. sent24: that if the luminescence is not an endocrine the fact that the pocketcomb is not vulnerable and does measure Zapus is not correct is not false. sent25: the Maoist remonstrates Tulsa and it is a kind of a crankiness.
sent8 & sent15 -> int1: that the electron does not remonstrate microgametophyte and does freckle is wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the caulk is not batholithic.; sent4 -> int3: if the caulk does not remonstrate let then it is not a kind of a crankiness.; sent23 -> int4: the caulk does not remonstrate let.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the caulk is not a crankiness.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the caulk is not batholithic and it is not a crankiness.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the luminescence is vulnerable.; sent13 -> int8: the fact that the luminescence is interstellar is correct if it is a kind of an endocrine.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the luminescence is interstellar.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the luminescence is vulnerable and it is interstellar.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the electron is not an endocrine.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is vulnerable and is interstellar. ; $context$ = sent1: the pocketcomb is not a freckled. sent2: The Zapus does not measure pocketcomb. sent3: the pocketcomb is batholithic. sent4: something that does not remonstrate let is not a crankiness. sent5: the caulk is not batholithic if that the electron does not remonstrate microgametophyte but it is a freckled is not right. sent6: the luminescence does not measure Zapus. sent7: if that the luminescence is non-endocrine is not incorrect it does not remonstrate microgametophyte. sent8: if the pocketcomb does not measure Zapus that the electron does not remonstrate microgametophyte but it does freckle is false. sent9: the fact that the pocketcomb is not a kind of a crankiness is true. sent10: the luminescence is vulnerable if the caulk is not batholithic and not a crankiness. sent11: the luminescence is an endocrine. sent12: the electron is a crankiness. sent13: if something is an endocrine then it is interstellar. sent14: the electron is not vulnerable. sent15: the pocketcomb does not measure Zapus. sent16: there exists something such that it is interstellar. sent17: something is vulnerable. sent18: if the electron does not freckle the caulk is not batholithic. sent19: the pocketcomb does not remonstrate let if the caulk does measure Zapus. sent20: the electron is not interstellar if the luminescence remonstrates microgametophyte. sent21: the caulk does not include. sent22: the luminescence does not include. sent23: the caulk does not include and does not remonstrate let. sent24: that if the luminescence is not an endocrine the fact that the pocketcomb is not vulnerable and does measure Zapus is not correct is not false. sent25: the Maoist remonstrates Tulsa and it is a kind of a crankiness. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent15 -> int1: that the electron does not remonstrate microgametophyte and does freckle is wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the caulk is not batholithic.; sent4 -> int3: if the caulk does not remonstrate let then it is not a kind of a crankiness.; sent23 -> int4: the caulk does not remonstrate let.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the caulk is not a crankiness.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the caulk is not batholithic and it is not a crankiness.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the luminescence is vulnerable.; sent13 -> int8: the fact that the luminescence is interstellar is correct if it is a kind of an endocrine.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the luminescence is interstellar.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the luminescence is vulnerable and it is interstellar.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__