that the peg is an intellectual that is a kind of an epidemic is not true.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a shank and barographic does not hold the peg is an epidemic. sent2: the fact that the saucer does not crab if the chondrichthian is not unbroken is not wrong. sent3: that the enation is not earthy and does not crab is not correct if there is something such that it is not a shank. sent4: that the dog is an intellectual that is unbroken is not incorrect if there is something such that it is earthy. sent5: something is not unbroken if it is not a kind of a cocobolo and/or is not an acoustic. sent6: the stuffer is not a shank if there exists something such that it is not barographic and not a pug. sent7: the dog is not earthy if the fact that the enation is a kind of earthy thing that is amygdaline is not right. sent8: the peg is intellectual if something that is not a crab is not unbroken. sent9: the saucer is not a kind of a crab. sent10: the chondrichthian is an acoustic. sent11: the stuffer is not a pug. sent12: the chondrichthian is not intellectual if the dog is an intellectual and it is unbroken. sent13: that the enation is a kind of earthy thing that is amygdaline does not hold. sent14: the colt is not amygdaline. sent15: if the stuffer is not a pug then that it is a shank and is barographic is not right. sent16: if that the chondrichthian is not a kind of a cocobolo or is not acoustic or both does not hold the dog is earthy. sent17: the saucer is earthy if there exists something such that the fact that it is not earthy and not a crab does not hold. sent18: the saucer is not a kind of a crab and it is not unbroken if the fact that the chondrichthian is not unbroken is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that either the chondrichthian is not a cocobolo or it is not an acoustic or both does not hold.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the dog is not non-earthy.; sent7 & sent13 -> int2: the dog is not earthy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the chondrichthian is not a cocobolo and/or it is not an acoustic.; sent5 -> int5: if the chondrichthian is not a cocobolo and/or it is not an acoustic it is not unbroken.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chondrichthian is not unbroken.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the saucer is not a crab and it is not unbroken.; int7 -> int8: something is not a crab and is not unbroken.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the peg is an intellectual.; sent15 & sent11 -> int10: that the stuffer is a kind of a shank that is barographic does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that that it is both a shank and barographic is correct does not hold.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the peg is an epidemic.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the peg is an intellectual and it is a kind of an epidemic is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = that the peg is an intellectual that is a kind of an epidemic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a shank and barographic does not hold the peg is an epidemic. sent2: the fact that the saucer does not crab if the chondrichthian is not unbroken is not wrong. sent3: that the enation is not earthy and does not crab is not correct if there is something such that it is not a shank. sent4: that the dog is an intellectual that is unbroken is not incorrect if there is something such that it is earthy. sent5: something is not unbroken if it is not a kind of a cocobolo and/or is not an acoustic. sent6: the stuffer is not a shank if there exists something such that it is not barographic and not a pug. sent7: the dog is not earthy if the fact that the enation is a kind of earthy thing that is amygdaline is not right. sent8: the peg is intellectual if something that is not a crab is not unbroken. sent9: the saucer is not a kind of a crab. sent10: the chondrichthian is an acoustic. sent11: the stuffer is not a pug. sent12: the chondrichthian is not intellectual if the dog is an intellectual and it is unbroken. sent13: that the enation is a kind of earthy thing that is amygdaline does not hold. sent14: the colt is not amygdaline. sent15: if the stuffer is not a pug then that it is a shank and is barographic is not right. sent16: if that the chondrichthian is not a kind of a cocobolo or is not acoustic or both does not hold the dog is earthy. sent17: the saucer is earthy if there exists something such that the fact that it is not earthy and not a crab does not hold. sent18: the saucer is not a kind of a crab and it is not unbroken if the fact that the chondrichthian is not unbroken is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that either the chondrichthian is not a cocobolo or it is not an acoustic or both does not hold.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the dog is not non-earthy.; sent7 & sent13 -> int2: the dog is not earthy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the chondrichthian is not a cocobolo and/or it is not an acoustic.; sent5 -> int5: if the chondrichthian is not a cocobolo and/or it is not an acoustic it is not unbroken.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chondrichthian is not unbroken.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the saucer is not a crab and it is not unbroken.; int7 -> int8: something is not a crab and is not unbroken.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the peg is an intellectual.; sent15 & sent11 -> int10: that the stuffer is a kind of a shank that is barographic does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that that it is both a shank and barographic is correct does not hold.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the peg is an epidemic.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__