the fact that the escapement is a cowlick and is a kind of a underlip is not correct.
sent1: the shunter pigments hole. sent2: that the Reynard is not a branched but it is a Wiccan does not hold. sent3: the fact that the escapement is a cowlick and a underlip is not correct if the shunter is not inward. sent4: the escapement is a cowlick if the fact that the Reynard is not a branched and is not a Wiccan does not hold. sent5: the escapement is a kind of a underlip. sent6: the liar is a kind of a petrology if it does ascertain Eastertide. sent7: if the shunter is a kind of a cowlick and it is inward then the escapement is not a branched. sent8: if the fact that the stream does not pigment hole and it is not a underlip does not hold the shunter is a branched. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a underlip the stream is not a Wiccan. sent10: if the stream does not branch the fact that the Reynard does branch and is not a Wiccan does not hold. sent11: something ascertains Eastertide. sent12: the fact that the Reynard is not a branched and it is not a kind of a Wiccan is wrong if the stream is not a kind of a branched. sent13: the stream is not a kind of a branched if the shunter is inward and does pigment hole. sent14: The hole pigments shunter. sent15: the fact that the Reynard is a kind of a branched that is not Wiccan is not true. sent16: if the Reynard is not a underlip and/or it ascertains Eastertide then it is not a kind of a underlip. sent17: the shunter is not outward. sent18: the borstal does pigment hole. sent19: the hole is a branched and inward if there is something such that it does not pigment hole. sent20: if the stream is not a kind of a branched that the Reynard is not a branched but it is a Wiccan is wrong. sent21: the liar ascertains Eastertide. sent22: if there exists something such that it does ascertain Eastertide then the Reynard is not a kind of a underlip and/or does ascertain Eastertide. sent23: the escapement is both a braggadocio and a Aghan. sent24: the shunter is a kind of a branched.
sent17 & sent1 -> int1: the shunter is inward and does pigment hole.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the stream does not branch.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the Reynard is not a branched and is not Wiccan is wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the escapement is a cowlick.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the escapement is a kind of a cowlick and it is a underlip does not hold.
sent6 & sent21 -> int5: the liar is a petrology.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the escapement is a cowlick and is a kind of a underlip is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the shunter pigments hole. sent2: that the Reynard is not a branched but it is a Wiccan does not hold. sent3: the fact that the escapement is a cowlick and a underlip is not correct if the shunter is not inward. sent4: the escapement is a cowlick if the fact that the Reynard is not a branched and is not a Wiccan does not hold. sent5: the escapement is a kind of a underlip. sent6: the liar is a kind of a petrology if it does ascertain Eastertide. sent7: if the shunter is a kind of a cowlick and it is inward then the escapement is not a branched. sent8: if the fact that the stream does not pigment hole and it is not a underlip does not hold the shunter is a branched. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a underlip the stream is not a Wiccan. sent10: if the stream does not branch the fact that the Reynard does branch and is not a Wiccan does not hold. sent11: something ascertains Eastertide. sent12: the fact that the Reynard is not a branched and it is not a kind of a Wiccan is wrong if the stream is not a kind of a branched. sent13: the stream is not a kind of a branched if the shunter is inward and does pigment hole. sent14: The hole pigments shunter. sent15: the fact that the Reynard is a kind of a branched that is not Wiccan is not true. sent16: if the Reynard is not a underlip and/or it ascertains Eastertide then it is not a kind of a underlip. sent17: the shunter is not outward. sent18: the borstal does pigment hole. sent19: the hole is a branched and inward if there is something such that it does not pigment hole. sent20: if the stream is not a kind of a branched that the Reynard is not a branched but it is a Wiccan is wrong. sent21: the liar ascertains Eastertide. sent22: if there exists something such that it does ascertain Eastertide then the Reynard is not a kind of a underlip and/or does ascertain Eastertide. sent23: the escapement is both a braggadocio and a Aghan. sent24: the shunter is a kind of a branched. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent1 -> int1: the shunter is inward and does pigment hole.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the stream does not branch.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the Reynard is not a branched and is not Wiccan is wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the escapement is a cowlick.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__