the fact that if the neophyte does not foreshow oviraptorid then the fact that the olecranon is not altitudinal but it is dysplastic is incorrect is false.
sent1: if something is a hairbrush or is not subarctic or both then it is a kind of a paramagnet. sent2: the neophyte is statuary and does not foreshow oviraptorid if it is not a paramagnet. sent3: the perihelion is a kind of a hairbrush and/or it is not subarctic if that the neophyte does not foreshow oviraptorid hold. sent4: the perihelion is a kind of non-altitudinal thing that is a hairbrush if the olecranon is not subarctic. sent5: something is not a paramagnet if the fact that it is a paramagnet and dysplastic is not true. sent6: if something is not altitudinal that it is a paramagnet and it is dysplastic does not hold. sent7: the olecranon is hydrodynamics. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a paramagnet hold then the fact that the olecranon is non-altitudinal thing that is dysplastic is not correct. sent9: the fact that the olecranon is altitudinal and it is dysplastic is wrong if the neophyte does not foreshow oviraptorid. sent10: if the fact that the neophyte either is a discovery or does not doctor babbler or both is wrong it is not altitudinal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the neophyte does not foreshow oviraptorid is right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the perihelion is a hairbrush or is not subarctic or both.; sent1 -> int2: that the perihelion is the paramagnet if the perihelion is a hairbrush and/or it is not subarctic is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the perihelion is a paramagnet.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a paramagnet.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: that the olecranon is both non-altitudinal and dysplastic is not true.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it is statuary.
sent5 -> int6: if that the neophyte is a kind of a paramagnet that is not non-dysplastic does not hold that it is not a paramagnet is not false.; sent6 -> int7: the fact that the neophyte is a kind of a paramagnet that is dysplastic is not true if it is non-altitudinal.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the neophyte does not foreshow oviraptorid then the fact that the olecranon is not altitudinal but it is dysplastic is incorrect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a hairbrush or is not subarctic or both then it is a kind of a paramagnet. sent2: the neophyte is statuary and does not foreshow oviraptorid if it is not a paramagnet. sent3: the perihelion is a kind of a hairbrush and/or it is not subarctic if that the neophyte does not foreshow oviraptorid hold. sent4: the perihelion is a kind of non-altitudinal thing that is a hairbrush if the olecranon is not subarctic. sent5: something is not a paramagnet if the fact that it is a paramagnet and dysplastic is not true. sent6: if something is not altitudinal that it is a paramagnet and it is dysplastic does not hold. sent7: the olecranon is hydrodynamics. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a paramagnet hold then the fact that the olecranon is non-altitudinal thing that is dysplastic is not correct. sent9: the fact that the olecranon is altitudinal and it is dysplastic is wrong if the neophyte does not foreshow oviraptorid. sent10: if the fact that the neophyte either is a discovery or does not doctor babbler or both is wrong it is not altitudinal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the neophyte does not foreshow oviraptorid is right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the perihelion is a hairbrush or is not subarctic or both.; sent1 -> int2: that the perihelion is the paramagnet if the perihelion is a hairbrush and/or it is not subarctic is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the perihelion is a paramagnet.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a paramagnet.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: that the olecranon is both non-altitudinal and dysplastic is not true.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__