the Venezuelanness occurs.
sent1: the somersaulting yields that the meaninglessness occurs. sent2: the Venezuelanness occurs if the meaninglessness occurs. sent3: if the alternatingness does not occur the denying megalomaniac occurs and the beckoning garrison occurs. sent4: if the fact that the alternatingness happens hold the somersault occurs. sent5: the beckoning garrison happens and the alternating happens. sent6: the non-Venezuelanness is caused by that the beckoning garrison does not occur.
sent5 -> int1: the alternating occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the somersaulting occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the meaninglessness happens.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the denying megalomaniac occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the Venezuelanness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the somersaulting yields that the meaninglessness occurs. sent2: the Venezuelanness occurs if the meaninglessness occurs. sent3: if the alternatingness does not occur the denying megalomaniac occurs and the beckoning garrison occurs. sent4: if the fact that the alternatingness happens hold the somersault occurs. sent5: the beckoning garrison happens and the alternating happens. sent6: the non-Venezuelanness is caused by that the beckoning garrison does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the alternating occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the somersaulting occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the meaninglessness happens.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__