the fact that if the pound sightsees then the crouton is not trustful is not true.
sent1: the crouton is trustful. sent2: the crouton does slog eloquence. sent3: the pound is not non-cyclopean. sent4: the crouton is not trustful if the pound sightsees but it does not slog eloquence. sent5: the pound is a Moody but it does not strip crouton. sent6: if there is something such that it is not a tick then the crouton is a bloodguilt and/or is not an obverse. sent7: the pound is not trustful if that the crouton does slog eloquence is true. sent8: the fact that the pongid is inclusive and it is a kind of a tick does not hold. sent9: if the pound sightsees the crouton slogs eloquence. sent10: the crouton is trustful if the pound sightsees but it does not slog eloquence. sent11: the crouton does not slog eloquence if the pound is trustful. sent12: the crouton does not sightsee if that the pound is trustful is true. sent13: The eloquence does not slog pound. sent14: something is not trustful but it is a kind of a flowering if it is an obverse. sent15: the crouton does not sightsee. sent16: if the crouton sightsees the pound is not trustful. sent17: the crouton is trustful but it does not sightsee. sent18: if that the pound does not slog eloquence and does sightsee is wrong the canopy does not slog eloquence. sent19: the pound does not slog eloquence. sent20: if the fact that the pongid is inclusive and ticks is not true it does not ticks. sent21: if the pound sightsees that the crouton is trustful hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pound sightsees.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: the pound does sightsee and does not slog eloquence.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the crouton is not trustful.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the canopy does not slog eloquence.
sent14 -> int3: if the pound is an obverse then it is not trustful and it is a flowering.; sent20 & sent8 -> int4: the pongid is not a kind of a tick.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a tick.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the crouton is a bloodguilt and/or it is not a kind of an obverse.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the pound sightsees then the crouton is not trustful is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the crouton is trustful. sent2: the crouton does slog eloquence. sent3: the pound is not non-cyclopean. sent4: the crouton is not trustful if the pound sightsees but it does not slog eloquence. sent5: the pound is a Moody but it does not strip crouton. sent6: if there is something such that it is not a tick then the crouton is a bloodguilt and/or is not an obverse. sent7: the pound is not trustful if that the crouton does slog eloquence is true. sent8: the fact that the pongid is inclusive and it is a kind of a tick does not hold. sent9: if the pound sightsees the crouton slogs eloquence. sent10: the crouton is trustful if the pound sightsees but it does not slog eloquence. sent11: the crouton does not slog eloquence if the pound is trustful. sent12: the crouton does not sightsee if that the pound is trustful is true. sent13: The eloquence does not slog pound. sent14: something is not trustful but it is a kind of a flowering if it is an obverse. sent15: the crouton does not sightsee. sent16: if the crouton sightsees the pound is not trustful. sent17: the crouton is trustful but it does not sightsee. sent18: if that the pound does not slog eloquence and does sightsee is wrong the canopy does not slog eloquence. sent19: the pound does not slog eloquence. sent20: if the fact that the pongid is inclusive and ticks is not true it does not ticks. sent21: if the pound sightsees that the crouton is trustful hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pound sightsees.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: the pound does sightsee and does not slog eloquence.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the crouton is not trustful.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__