the angrecum does not mystify baptism.
sent1: if that the warehouser is not a carnival is not wrong the longbow is not a kind of a carnival. sent2: the guardsman does outstare registrar if the angrecum is non-acetylic thing that does not outstare registrar. sent3: the guardsman is acetylic and it is a deist. sent4: everything does not outstare Landsteiner. sent5: if the fact that something is a praseodymium and/or it does mystify anesthesiologist is false it is not a carnival. sent6: the angrecum rhymes. sent7: the Liverpudlian is acetylic. sent8: if something is a stodginess the fact that it outstares longbow or is not aggressive or both is not correct. sent9: the angrecum does mystify baptism if the guardsman does mystify baptism. sent10: something does mystify eddy and is a kind of a sigh if the fact that it does not outstare Landsteiner is true. sent11: the guardsman does mystify achievability and it does rhyme. sent12: if that the angrecum is a deist is not wrong it is not acetylic and it does not outstare registrar. sent13: the guardsman is a rhymed. sent14: if something that is not a kind of a rhymed does not mystify achievability then the fact that it is not deist is true. sent15: the coffeeberry is clinical if the pasang does mystify eddy. sent16: something outstares transferability if that it outstares longbow and/or is not aggressive is incorrect. sent17: the fact that the warehouser is a praseodymium or it does mystify anesthesiologist or both is false if there exists something such that the fact that it is clinical is not false. sent18: the fact that the guardsman is a deist hold. sent19: if something is not a deist then the fact that it is acetylic thing that does not mystify baptism is not true. sent20: something is a Hallel that is a stodginess if it is not a kind of a carnival. sent21: the guardsman mystifies baptism if the fact that that the occiput is acetylic and does not mystifies baptism is not false is not right.
sent3 -> int1: the guardsman is acetylic.; sent11 -> int2: the guardsman mystifies achievability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the guardsman is acetylic and mystifies achievability.;
the guardsman does outstare registrar and it does rhyme.
$hypothesis$ = the angrecum does not mystify baptism. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the warehouser is not a carnival is not wrong the longbow is not a kind of a carnival. sent2: the guardsman does outstare registrar if the angrecum is non-acetylic thing that does not outstare registrar. sent3: the guardsman is acetylic and it is a deist. sent4: everything does not outstare Landsteiner. sent5: if the fact that something is a praseodymium and/or it does mystify anesthesiologist is false it is not a carnival. sent6: the angrecum rhymes. sent7: the Liverpudlian is acetylic. sent8: if something is a stodginess the fact that it outstares longbow or is not aggressive or both is not correct. sent9: the angrecum does mystify baptism if the guardsman does mystify baptism. sent10: something does mystify eddy and is a kind of a sigh if the fact that it does not outstare Landsteiner is true. sent11: the guardsman does mystify achievability and it does rhyme. sent12: if that the angrecum is a deist is not wrong it is not acetylic and it does not outstare registrar. sent13: the guardsman is a rhymed. sent14: if something that is not a kind of a rhymed does not mystify achievability then the fact that it is not deist is true. sent15: the coffeeberry is clinical if the pasang does mystify eddy. sent16: something outstares transferability if that it outstares longbow and/or is not aggressive is incorrect. sent17: the fact that the warehouser is a praseodymium or it does mystify anesthesiologist or both is false if there exists something such that the fact that it is clinical is not false. sent18: the fact that the guardsman is a deist hold. sent19: if something is not a deist then the fact that it is acetylic thing that does not mystify baptism is not true. sent20: something is a Hallel that is a stodginess if it is not a kind of a carnival. sent21: the guardsman mystifies baptism if the fact that that the occiput is acetylic and does not mystifies baptism is not false is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the guardsman is acetylic.; sent11 -> int2: the guardsman mystifies achievability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the guardsman is acetylic and mystifies achievability.; __UNKNOWN__