if the fact that not the circumvallating sapremia but the dermatologicness happens does not hold the adjective does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the openingness does not occur hold if the fact that the bong occurs or the adjectiveness does not occur or both is not true. sent2: the opening and the bong occurs if the biogeneticness does not occur. sent3: that the biogeneticness does not occur is correct. sent4: that the circumvallating sapremia does not occur but the dermatologicness occurs is triggered by that the pageant does not occur. sent5: that the adjective does not occur is triggered by that the pageant and the opening happens. sent6: the vaporization occurs and the pageant happens if the openingness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pageant does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: that not the circumvallating sapremia but the dermatologicness occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the circumvallating sapremia does not occur and the dermatologicness happens is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the pageant happens.; sent2 & sent3 -> int4: the opening and the bong happens.; int4 -> int5: the openingness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the pageant happens and the openingness occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the adjectiveness does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the vaporization happens is correct.
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that not the circumvallating sapremia but the dermatologicness happens does not hold the adjective does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the openingness does not occur hold if the fact that the bong occurs or the adjectiveness does not occur or both is not true. sent2: the opening and the bong occurs if the biogeneticness does not occur. sent3: that the biogeneticness does not occur is correct. sent4: that the circumvallating sapremia does not occur but the dermatologicness occurs is triggered by that the pageant does not occur. sent5: that the adjective does not occur is triggered by that the pageant and the opening happens. sent6: the vaporization occurs and the pageant happens if the openingness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pageant does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: that not the circumvallating sapremia but the dermatologicness occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the circumvallating sapremia does not occur and the dermatologicness happens is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the pageant happens.; sent2 & sent3 -> int4: the opening and the bong happens.; int4 -> int5: the openingness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the pageant happens and the openingness occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the adjectiveness does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__