that the Fabian is angry if the secobarbital is a vibrator is not correct.
sent1: if the Chateaubriand is not unclear then it spaces. sent2: that the secobarbital does punish relegation is not wrong if the Fabian is a vibrator. sent3: something is not a chemiluminescence if it is corneal. sent4: if the fact that the camera does blend but it does not punish relegation is not true it is a sickness. sent5: if the Fabian is nonlinguistic and it punishes relegation then the secobarbital is not a kind of a vibrator. sent6: if something is not a kind of a chemiluminescence it is both not a sickness and not a Eritrean. sent7: the secobarbital does not pass Fabian. sent8: if something that is not a sickness is not Eritrean then the Fabian is a vibrator. sent9: if the Fabian is nonlinguistic but it does not punish relegation the secobarbital is not a vibrator. sent10: the shallu is angry and is not unintelligent. sent11: if the Fabian does punish relegation then it is angry. sent12: if the fact that something is nonlinguistic but it does not punish relegation does not hold it is angry. sent13: the secobarbital is a kind of a defibrillator. sent14: if the secobarbital does not pass Fabian then it does pass Pinus and it is not non-corneal. sent15: if the fact that something is a vibrator that is unangry is not correct it is nonlinguistic.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Fabian is nonlinguistic but it does not punish relegation.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the secobarbital is not a vibrator.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the secobarbital is a vibrator.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Fabian is nonlinguistic and does not punish relegation is not right.; sent12 -> int4: the Fabian is angry if the fact that it is nonlinguistic and does not punish relegation is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Fabian is angry.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the organification is angry but it is not Jamesian is true.
sent6 -> int6: if that the secobarbital is not a chemiluminescence hold then it is not a sickness and it is not Eritrean.; sent3 -> int7: that the secobarbital is not a chemiluminescence hold if it is corneal.; sent14 & sent7 -> int8: the secobarbital does pass Pinus and it is corneal.; int8 -> int9: the secobarbital is corneal.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the secobarbital is not a chemiluminescence.; int6 & int10 -> int11: that the secobarbital is not a sickness and is not a Eritrean is not false.; int11 -> int12: something is not a sickness and it is not a Eritrean.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: the Fabian is a vibrator.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is a vibrator.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Fabian is angry if the secobarbital is a vibrator is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Chateaubriand is not unclear then it spaces. sent2: that the secobarbital does punish relegation is not wrong if the Fabian is a vibrator. sent3: something is not a chemiluminescence if it is corneal. sent4: if the fact that the camera does blend but it does not punish relegation is not true it is a sickness. sent5: if the Fabian is nonlinguistic and it punishes relegation then the secobarbital is not a kind of a vibrator. sent6: if something is not a kind of a chemiluminescence it is both not a sickness and not a Eritrean. sent7: the secobarbital does not pass Fabian. sent8: if something that is not a sickness is not Eritrean then the Fabian is a vibrator. sent9: if the Fabian is nonlinguistic but it does not punish relegation the secobarbital is not a vibrator. sent10: the shallu is angry and is not unintelligent. sent11: if the Fabian does punish relegation then it is angry. sent12: if the fact that something is nonlinguistic but it does not punish relegation does not hold it is angry. sent13: the secobarbital is a kind of a defibrillator. sent14: if the secobarbital does not pass Fabian then it does pass Pinus and it is not non-corneal. sent15: if the fact that something is a vibrator that is unangry is not correct it is nonlinguistic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Fabian is nonlinguistic but it does not punish relegation.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the secobarbital is not a vibrator.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the secobarbital is a vibrator.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Fabian is nonlinguistic and does not punish relegation is not right.; sent12 -> int4: the Fabian is angry if the fact that it is nonlinguistic and does not punish relegation is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Fabian is angry.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__