that if the accreditation does not occur then the phonicness happens is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the Delphicness does not occur or the culmination happens or both is not correct then the pentecostalness occurs. sent2: the emigration is triggered by that the mastering key and the non-rimlessness occurs. sent3: the bacchanal occurs. sent4: the traditionalism does not occur. sent5: the culmination happens. sent6: that the nonpasserineness happens is brought about by that both the deportation and the non-maturationalness occurs. sent7: the peronealness happens. sent8: that the accreditation happens and the nonmagneticness happens prevents that the pentecostalness occurs. sent9: the non-metabolicness is brought about by that the bradding femtosecond does not occur. sent10: that the bradding femtosecond does not occur and the conserve does not occur is brought about by that the territoriality happens. sent11: the fact that the Delphicness does not occur or the culmination does not occur or both does not hold. sent12: that the accreditation does not occur is prevented by that both the pentecostalness and the phonicness occurs. sent13: that the accreditation occurs prevents that the phonicness does not occur. sent14: that the accreditation and the nonmagneticness happens is brought about by the non-metabolicness. sent15: the rimmedness triggers that the beneficentness happens. sent16: that the pentecostalness and the non-phonicness occurs prevents that the accreditation does not occur. sent17: the pentecostalness occurs if the fact that the Delphicness does not occur or the culmination does not occur or both is not true. sent18: if the orgasm happens but the paving does not occur the heave happens. sent19: the ruling does not occur. sent20: the fact that the raping happens is not incorrect. sent21: the brisance but not the rentalness happens.
sent17 & sent11 -> int1: the pentecostalness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phonicness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pentecostalness but not the phonicness happens.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the accreditation occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the accreditation does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the phonicness occurs.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the ovoviviparousness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if the accreditation does not occur then the phonicness happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Delphicness does not occur or the culmination happens or both is not correct then the pentecostalness occurs. sent2: the emigration is triggered by that the mastering key and the non-rimlessness occurs. sent3: the bacchanal occurs. sent4: the traditionalism does not occur. sent5: the culmination happens. sent6: that the nonpasserineness happens is brought about by that both the deportation and the non-maturationalness occurs. sent7: the peronealness happens. sent8: that the accreditation happens and the nonmagneticness happens prevents that the pentecostalness occurs. sent9: the non-metabolicness is brought about by that the bradding femtosecond does not occur. sent10: that the bradding femtosecond does not occur and the conserve does not occur is brought about by that the territoriality happens. sent11: the fact that the Delphicness does not occur or the culmination does not occur or both does not hold. sent12: that the accreditation does not occur is prevented by that both the pentecostalness and the phonicness occurs. sent13: that the accreditation occurs prevents that the phonicness does not occur. sent14: that the accreditation and the nonmagneticness happens is brought about by the non-metabolicness. sent15: the rimmedness triggers that the beneficentness happens. sent16: that the pentecostalness and the non-phonicness occurs prevents that the accreditation does not occur. sent17: the pentecostalness occurs if the fact that the Delphicness does not occur or the culmination does not occur or both is not true. sent18: if the orgasm happens but the paving does not occur the heave happens. sent19: the ruling does not occur. sent20: the fact that the raping happens is not incorrect. sent21: the brisance but not the rentalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent11 -> int1: the pentecostalness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phonicness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pentecostalness but not the phonicness happens.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the accreditation occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the accreditation does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the phonicness occurs.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__