the stepmother is not a Jordanian.
sent1: if that the slicer is not a Mary but it chocks pomaded is incorrect then the boater is not aversive. sent2: the flytrap is campanulate or it does not brief melee or both if the stepmother is Jordanian. sent3: if that either something is Jordanian or it does not chock membrane or both is not true it is non-cold. sent4: the stater is not a treat. sent5: there is something such that it is aversive. sent6: if the stater is not a kind of a treat the fact that it is a shade that does stridulate is wrong. sent7: if the stepmother is a Jordanian the flytrap either is not campanulate or does not brief melee or both. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a Mary but it does chock pomaded is wrong if it does not shade. sent9: if the boater is not aversive then the fact that the stepmother is a kind of a Jordanian or it does not chock membrane or both is wrong. sent10: the slicer is not aversive. sent11: if there is something such that it is not aversive the boater does not chock membrane.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stepmother is Jordanian.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the flytrap is not campanulate or it does not brief melee or both.; sent10 -> int2: something is not aversive.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the boater does not chock membrane.;
the flytrap is not a kind of a misleader and/or it is not a cold.
sent3 -> int4: if that the fact that either the stepmother is a Jordanian or it does not chock membrane or both is not wrong is not right then it is not a cold.; sent8 -> int5: the fact that the slicer is not a kind of a Mary and does chock pomaded is false if it does not shade.; sent6 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the stater shades and stridulates is not right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it shades and does stridulate is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the stepmother is not a Jordanian. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the slicer is not a Mary but it chocks pomaded is incorrect then the boater is not aversive. sent2: the flytrap is campanulate or it does not brief melee or both if the stepmother is Jordanian. sent3: if that either something is Jordanian or it does not chock membrane or both is not true it is non-cold. sent4: the stater is not a treat. sent5: there is something such that it is aversive. sent6: if the stater is not a kind of a treat the fact that it is a shade that does stridulate is wrong. sent7: if the stepmother is a Jordanian the flytrap either is not campanulate or does not brief melee or both. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a Mary but it does chock pomaded is wrong if it does not shade. sent9: if the boater is not aversive then the fact that the stepmother is a kind of a Jordanian or it does not chock membrane or both is wrong. sent10: the slicer is not aversive. sent11: if there is something such that it is not aversive the boater does not chock membrane. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stepmother is Jordanian.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the flytrap is not campanulate or it does not brief melee or both.; sent10 -> int2: something is not aversive.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the boater does not chock membrane.; __UNKNOWN__