that if the trumpetfish is a kind of a planation the anchorage is transcultural is incorrect.
sent1: something does fragment admixture if it is a spruce. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does fragment Brahmanism and is not a kind of a recital is not right the trumpetfish is a kind of a planation. sent3: if the trumpetfish is cretaceous it is non-transcultural thing that is not a kind of a scours. sent4: the dampener is not transcultural if there exists something such that that it is a recital and it does not fragment Brahmanism is false. sent5: the dampener is a planation if it is a kind of a recital. sent6: the trumpetfish is cretaceous. sent7: if the trumpetfish is not transcultural then that the guard is not a Albugo and is a planation is false. sent8: the limey does fragment Brahmanism. sent9: there is something such that it does fragment Brahmanism and it is not a recital. sent10: the anchorage is taxonomic if the dampener fragments Brahmanism but it is not a recital. sent11: something is transcultural if it is a Albugo. sent12: if something is taxonomic it is a planation. sent13: if there exists something such that it does not fragment Brahmanism then the trumpetfish is not a planation. sent14: the dampener does fragment Brahmanism. sent15: if something is taxonomic it is a Albugo. sent16: something convoys hydrolith if it is civics. sent17: if that something is not a kind of a Albugo but it is a planation is false then it is taxonomic. sent18: the Chinese is transcultural. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it does fragment Brahmanism and it is a kind of a recital is wrong. sent20: if there exists something such that that it does fragment Brahmanism and it is not a kind of a recital is not true the trumpetfish is not a planation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the dampener does fragment Brahmanism but it is not a kind of a recital is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does fragment Brahmanism and it is not a recital is false.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the trumpetfish is not a planation.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the trumpetfish is a kind of a planation.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dampener does fragment Brahmanism but it is not a recital.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the fact that the anchorage is taxonomic is right.; sent15 -> int6: if the anchorage is taxonomic it is a kind of a Albugo.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the anchorage is a Albugo.; sent11 -> int8: the fact that the anchorage is transcultural is correct if it is a Albugo.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the anchorage is transcultural.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the guard is taxonomic.
sent17 -> int10: if the fact that the guard is not a Albugo but it is a kind of a planation is false it is taxonomic.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the trumpetfish is a kind of a planation the anchorage is transcultural is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something does fragment admixture if it is a spruce. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does fragment Brahmanism and is not a kind of a recital is not right the trumpetfish is a kind of a planation. sent3: if the trumpetfish is cretaceous it is non-transcultural thing that is not a kind of a scours. sent4: the dampener is not transcultural if there exists something such that that it is a recital and it does not fragment Brahmanism is false. sent5: the dampener is a planation if it is a kind of a recital. sent6: the trumpetfish is cretaceous. sent7: if the trumpetfish is not transcultural then that the guard is not a Albugo and is a planation is false. sent8: the limey does fragment Brahmanism. sent9: there is something such that it does fragment Brahmanism and it is not a recital. sent10: the anchorage is taxonomic if the dampener fragments Brahmanism but it is not a recital. sent11: something is transcultural if it is a Albugo. sent12: if something is taxonomic it is a planation. sent13: if there exists something such that it does not fragment Brahmanism then the trumpetfish is not a planation. sent14: the dampener does fragment Brahmanism. sent15: if something is taxonomic it is a Albugo. sent16: something convoys hydrolith if it is civics. sent17: if that something is not a kind of a Albugo but it is a planation is false then it is taxonomic. sent18: the Chinese is transcultural. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it does fragment Brahmanism and it is a kind of a recital is wrong. sent20: if there exists something such that that it does fragment Brahmanism and it is not a kind of a recital is not true the trumpetfish is not a planation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the dampener does fragment Brahmanism but it is not a kind of a recital is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does fragment Brahmanism and it is not a recital is false.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the trumpetfish is not a planation.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the trumpetfish is a kind of a planation.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dampener does fragment Brahmanism but it is not a recital.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the fact that the anchorage is taxonomic is right.; sent15 -> int6: if the anchorage is taxonomic it is a kind of a Albugo.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the anchorage is a Albugo.; sent11 -> int8: the fact that the anchorage is transcultural is correct if it is a Albugo.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the anchorage is transcultural.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__