the Permalloy is not a kind of a supremacist.
sent1: the bedside is not hemodynamics or it is mythic or both if the carnallite does fry. sent2: if the fact that something unbars ruddle and is not attentive does not hold then it is a torridity. sent3: something is a supremacist that does not fry if it is a kind of a torridity. sent4: that the bedside is not hemodynamics and/or it is not mythic is not wrong if the carnallite fries. sent5: the carnallite fries.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the bedside is not hemodynamics or it is not mythic or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that either it is not hemodynamics or it is not mythic or both.;
the Permalloy is a supremacist.
sent3 -> int3: if the Permalloy is a torridity then it is a supremacist and does not fry.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the Permalloy is a torridity is right if the fact that it unbars ruddle and is not attentive is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the Permalloy is not a kind of a supremacist. ; $context$ = sent1: the bedside is not hemodynamics or it is mythic or both if the carnallite does fry. sent2: if the fact that something unbars ruddle and is not attentive does not hold then it is a torridity. sent3: something is a supremacist that does not fry if it is a kind of a torridity. sent4: that the bedside is not hemodynamics and/or it is not mythic is not wrong if the carnallite fries. sent5: the carnallite fries. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the bedside is not hemodynamics or it is not mythic or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that either it is not hemodynamics or it is not mythic or both.; __UNKNOWN__