the bait is sonic.
sent1: that the langbeinite is not carbocyclic is true. sent2: a carbocyclic thing trails. sent3: if the fact that the langbeinite is not carbocyclic is not incorrect then that the hydrogel does not trail and is a bank does not hold. sent4: the fact that the hydrogel is a trail and does bank does not hold. sent5: if the langbeinite is non-carbocyclic the fact that the hydrogel is both a trail and a bank is not correct. sent6: the fact that the bait is sonic is incorrect if the langbeinite extends planning and is carbocyclic. sent7: if the fact that the hydrogel is not a trail and does bank is not right the bait is not non-sonic. sent8: the hydrogel does extend planning or slimes vermifuge or both.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the hydrogel is not a trail but a bank is incorrect.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the recitalist does trail is right.
sent2 -> int2: the recitalist trails if that it is carbocyclic hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the bait is sonic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the langbeinite is not carbocyclic is true. sent2: a carbocyclic thing trails. sent3: if the fact that the langbeinite is not carbocyclic is not incorrect then that the hydrogel does not trail and is a bank does not hold. sent4: the fact that the hydrogel is a trail and does bank does not hold. sent5: if the langbeinite is non-carbocyclic the fact that the hydrogel is both a trail and a bank is not correct. sent6: the fact that the bait is sonic is incorrect if the langbeinite extends planning and is carbocyclic. sent7: if the fact that the hydrogel is not a trail and does bank is not right the bait is not non-sonic. sent8: the hydrogel does extend planning or slimes vermifuge or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the hydrogel is not a trail but a bank is incorrect.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__