the fact that the bouillabaisse investigates and it outstares shaman is false.
sent1: if the fact that the hamburger is not a Americanization and does investigate is incorrect the boathouse does investigate. sent2: the boathouse is not a Americanization if the bouillabaisse is not non-centesimal and is not a spindleberry. sent3: the hamburger does ruddle. sent4: the bouillabaisse is centesimal and is not a spindleberry if it does not investigate. sent5: if the boathouse does investigate then the bouillabaisse is both cytoplasmic and not pentatonic. sent6: the hamburger is not a kind of a ruddles if the boathouse either is not a kind of a Americanization or is not a Phalaropidae or both. sent7: something does outstare shaman if it is a kind of a galbulus. sent8: the bouillabaisse is a galbulus. sent9: the hamburger is not centesimal if the bouillabaisse is a kind of a ruddles and it outstares shaman.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bouillabaisse does not investigate.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the bouillabaisse is centesimal but it is not a spindleberry.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the boathouse is not a kind of a Americanization.; int2 -> int3: either the boathouse is not a Americanization or it is not a Phalaropidae or both.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the hamburger does not ruddle.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the bouillabaisse investigates.; sent7 -> int7: the bouillabaisse does outstare shaman if it is a kind of a galbulus.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the fact that the bouillabaisse does outstare shaman is right.; int6 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the bouillabaisse is cytoplasmic and not pentatonic.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bouillabaisse investigates and it outstares shaman is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the hamburger is not a Americanization and does investigate is incorrect the boathouse does investigate. sent2: the boathouse is not a Americanization if the bouillabaisse is not non-centesimal and is not a spindleberry. sent3: the hamburger does ruddle. sent4: the bouillabaisse is centesimal and is not a spindleberry if it does not investigate. sent5: if the boathouse does investigate then the bouillabaisse is both cytoplasmic and not pentatonic. sent6: the hamburger is not a kind of a ruddles if the boathouse either is not a kind of a Americanization or is not a Phalaropidae or both. sent7: something does outstare shaman if it is a kind of a galbulus. sent8: the bouillabaisse is a galbulus. sent9: the hamburger is not centesimal if the bouillabaisse is a kind of a ruddles and it outstares shaman. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bouillabaisse does not investigate.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the bouillabaisse is centesimal but it is not a spindleberry.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the boathouse is not a kind of a Americanization.; int2 -> int3: either the boathouse is not a Americanization or it is not a Phalaropidae or both.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the hamburger does not ruddle.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the bouillabaisse investigates.; sent7 -> int7: the bouillabaisse does outstare shaman if it is a kind of a galbulus.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the fact that the bouillabaisse does outstare shaman is right.; int6 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__