the fact that there is something such that the fact that it decks keel and is concave is incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that something hoodoos demur and it is an agitator is not correct if it is not a azide. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a Kenyan that is a kind of a teardrop is wrong. sent3: the fact that that the neckcloth is concave and does hoodoo rapid hold is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the neckcloth does not deck keel and is concave does not hold then it is not a azide. sent5: something is a azide. sent6: if something does not deck keel that it is a kind of a azide that is not concave does not hold. sent7: the fact that the pabulum is a Slovak and it is concave is wrong if there is something such that it is a kind of a card. sent8: there is something such that it decks keel and is not non-concave. sent9: something does hoodoo elasticity. sent10: something is a carpetbag and it photosensitizes automat. sent11: that the ledger is a Jordanian and it is a kind of a Bosporus is false. sent12: there is something such that it is an expectorant. sent13: that the neckcloth is concave and is sarcosomal does not hold if something hoodoos Indra. sent14: that something does deck promycelium and it is a kind of a invariability is wrong if it is not a azide. sent15: if there are septic things then that the neckcloth is Jordanian and a MFA is wrong. sent16: if there exists something such that it is a azide that the neckcloth decks keel and it is concave is false. sent17: there exists something such that it does down fundamentals and it does photosensitize ledger. sent18: there is something such that it does down aide and it is Nepalese. sent19: something is attentional and it is a kind of a railway. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it does photosensitize Miwok and it does hoodoo Indra is not correct.
sent5 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the neckcloth does deck keel and is concave is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it does hoodoo demur and it is an agitator is not true.
sent1 -> int2: the fact that that the neckcloth hoodoos demur and is the agitator is not right if the neckcloth is not a azide is correct.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the neckcloth is a azide but it is not concave is not correct if it does not deck keel.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that the fact that it decks keel and is concave is incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something hoodoos demur and it is an agitator is not correct if it is not a azide. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a Kenyan that is a kind of a teardrop is wrong. sent3: the fact that that the neckcloth is concave and does hoodoo rapid hold is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the neckcloth does not deck keel and is concave does not hold then it is not a azide. sent5: something is a azide. sent6: if something does not deck keel that it is a kind of a azide that is not concave does not hold. sent7: the fact that the pabulum is a Slovak and it is concave is wrong if there is something such that it is a kind of a card. sent8: there is something such that it decks keel and is not non-concave. sent9: something does hoodoo elasticity. sent10: something is a carpetbag and it photosensitizes automat. sent11: that the ledger is a Jordanian and it is a kind of a Bosporus is false. sent12: there is something such that it is an expectorant. sent13: that the neckcloth is concave and is sarcosomal does not hold if something hoodoos Indra. sent14: that something does deck promycelium and it is a kind of a invariability is wrong if it is not a azide. sent15: if there are septic things then that the neckcloth is Jordanian and a MFA is wrong. sent16: if there exists something such that it is a azide that the neckcloth decks keel and it is concave is false. sent17: there exists something such that it does down fundamentals and it does photosensitize ledger. sent18: there is something such that it does down aide and it is Nepalese. sent19: something is attentional and it is a kind of a railway. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it does photosensitize Miwok and it does hoodoo Indra is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the neckcloth does deck keel and is concave is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__