the dowdy does liquefy sniper.
sent1: the steeplechaser is not a A-horizon if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-branchial and teleological is wrong. sent2: if the steeplechaser is not a kind of a A-horizon it is non-octal thing that is not a Thuringia. sent3: that if there exists something such that it is octal the steeplechaser is not a Thuringia hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-branchial thing that is teleological is not true. sent5: the dowdy does not liquefy sniper if the steeplechaser does not liquefy sniper but it is a A-horizon.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the steeplechaser is not a A-horizon.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the steeplechaser is not octal and it is not a kind of a Thuringia.; int2 -> int3: the steeplechaser is not a Thuringia.;
the dowdy does not liquefy sniper.
$hypothesis$ = the dowdy does liquefy sniper. ; $context$ = sent1: the steeplechaser is not a A-horizon if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-branchial and teleological is wrong. sent2: if the steeplechaser is not a kind of a A-horizon it is non-octal thing that is not a Thuringia. sent3: that if there exists something such that it is octal the steeplechaser is not a Thuringia hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-branchial thing that is teleological is not true. sent5: the dowdy does not liquefy sniper if the steeplechaser does not liquefy sniper but it is a A-horizon. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the steeplechaser is not a A-horizon.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the steeplechaser is not octal and it is not a kind of a Thuringia.; int2 -> int3: the steeplechaser is not a Thuringia.; __UNKNOWN__