the platform is grapelike and it is discernible.
sent1: if that that something is Pakistani and does not mismanage Coue hold is not true then it is not discernible. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a due and is intercellular is false. sent3: the platform is not intercellular. sent4: the lingonberry does not mismanage dibble. sent5: something is a Pakistani if it is not a democratization. sent6: that something is a kind of a Pakistani but it does not mismanage Coue is not true if it is a democratization. sent7: if something is not grapelike it is Pakistani. sent8: that the dibble does not mismanage Coue is correct. sent9: the fact that the dibble is a kind of non-due thing that is not intercellular is not true if it does not mismanage Coue. sent10: that the dibble does not freckle platform but it is due is wrong if it is not a Sorensen. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is not a Arabic and not a due is not true the dibble is a democratization. sent12: if there is something such that it is not a Arabic the dibble is a kind of a democratization. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a bitartrate and is not a kind of a Priam. sent14: if something does not mismanage dibble that it is a Arabic and it sells does not hold. sent15: if that something is a Arabic and it is a kind of a sell is not true it is not a Arabic. sent16: if something is not aware then that it vamps hold. sent17: the platform is grapelike if there exists something such that that it is not a due and is not intercellular does not hold. sent18: That the Coue does not mismanage dibble is correct. sent19: something is discernible and it is a kind of a Pakistani if it is not a democratization. sent20: the platform is a Arabic but it is not a kind of a democratization.
sent9 & sent8 -> int1: that the dibble is not due and not intercellular is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not a due and it is not intercellular is wrong.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the platform is not non-grapelike.; sent19 -> int4: if the platform is not a democratization it is discernible and is Pakistani.; sent20 -> int5: the platform is not a kind of a democratization.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the platform is a kind of discernible a Pakistani.; int6 -> int7: the platform is discernible.; int3 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the platform is grapelike and it is discernible is not true.
sent1 -> int8: if that the dibble is Pakistani and does not mismanage Coue is not correct it is not discernible.; sent6 -> int9: the fact that the dibble is a Pakistani but it does not mismanage Coue is not right if it is a kind of a democratization.; sent15 -> int10: if the fact that the lingonberry is a Arabic and does sell is incorrect it is not a kind of a Arabic.; sent14 -> int11: the fact that the lingonberry is a kind of a Arabic and it is a sell does not hold if it does not mismanage dibble.; int11 & sent4 -> int12: that the lingonberry is a Arabic and a sell is wrong.; int10 & int12 -> int13: that the lingonberry is not a Arabic is not incorrect.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Arabic.; int14 & sent12 -> int15: the dibble is a democratization.; int9 & int15 -> int16: that the dibble is a kind of a Pakistani but it does not mismanage Coue is false.; int8 & int16 -> int17: the dibble is not discernible.; int17 -> int18: there are non-discernible things.;
$hypothesis$ = the platform is grapelike and it is discernible. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that something is Pakistani and does not mismanage Coue hold is not true then it is not discernible. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a due and is intercellular is false. sent3: the platform is not intercellular. sent4: the lingonberry does not mismanage dibble. sent5: something is a Pakistani if it is not a democratization. sent6: that something is a kind of a Pakistani but it does not mismanage Coue is not true if it is a democratization. sent7: if something is not grapelike it is Pakistani. sent8: that the dibble does not mismanage Coue is correct. sent9: the fact that the dibble is a kind of non-due thing that is not intercellular is not true if it does not mismanage Coue. sent10: that the dibble does not freckle platform but it is due is wrong if it is not a Sorensen. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is not a Arabic and not a due is not true the dibble is a democratization. sent12: if there is something such that it is not a Arabic the dibble is a kind of a democratization. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a bitartrate and is not a kind of a Priam. sent14: if something does not mismanage dibble that it is a Arabic and it sells does not hold. sent15: if that something is a Arabic and it is a kind of a sell is not true it is not a Arabic. sent16: if something is not aware then that it vamps hold. sent17: the platform is grapelike if there exists something such that that it is not a due and is not intercellular does not hold. sent18: That the Coue does not mismanage dibble is correct. sent19: something is discernible and it is a kind of a Pakistani if it is not a democratization. sent20: the platform is a Arabic but it is not a kind of a democratization. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent8 -> int1: that the dibble is not due and not intercellular is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not a due and it is not intercellular is wrong.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the platform is not non-grapelike.; sent19 -> int4: if the platform is not a democratization it is discernible and is Pakistani.; sent20 -> int5: the platform is not a kind of a democratization.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the platform is a kind of discernible a Pakistani.; int6 -> int7: the platform is discernible.; int3 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__