that if the handout does not occur then the treat occurs and the backgrounding happens does not hold.
sent1: the ungratefulness occurs. sent2: the toxicness does not occur. sent3: the praying happens. sent4: the ungratefulness does not occur if not the treating but the handout happens. sent5: the establishment does not occur and the benignness does not occur. sent6: the Carmelite does not occur. sent7: if the treating does not occur and the handout does not occur then the ungratefulness does not occur. sent8: if the cloning does not occur and the fare-stage does not occur the swag does not occur. sent9: both the praying and the backgrounding occurs. sent10: that the handout happens results in that both the treating and the background occurs. sent11: both the emptyingness and the comptrollership occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the treat does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handout does not occur.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the treating does not occur and the handout does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the ungratefulness does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the treating occurs.; sent9 -> int5: the backgrounding occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the treating and the background occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the handout does not occur then the treat occurs and the backgrounding happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the ungratefulness occurs. sent2: the toxicness does not occur. sent3: the praying happens. sent4: the ungratefulness does not occur if not the treating but the handout happens. sent5: the establishment does not occur and the benignness does not occur. sent6: the Carmelite does not occur. sent7: if the treating does not occur and the handout does not occur then the ungratefulness does not occur. sent8: if the cloning does not occur and the fare-stage does not occur the swag does not occur. sent9: both the praying and the backgrounding occurs. sent10: that the handout happens results in that both the treating and the background occurs. sent11: both the emptyingness and the comptrollership occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the treat does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handout does not occur.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the treating does not occur and the handout does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the ungratefulness does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the treating occurs.; sent9 -> int5: the backgrounding occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the treating and the background occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__