the fact that the neostigmine is not a kind of a disinterest and it is not Luxemburger is not right if the linuron is not structural.
sent1: the neostigmine is not a disinterest. sent2: the linuron is not a kind of a disinterest. sent3: if something that is a disinterest is not a Luxemburger then that it is not a kind of a lull hold. sent4: the linuron is structural if the neostigmine does not lull. sent5: if the linuron is not a lull then the fact that the neostigmine is non-Luxemburger and it is not structural is wrong. sent6: if the linuron is not structural then the fact that the neostigmine is not a disinterest but it is a Luxemburger is incorrect. sent7: if the linuron is non-structural the neostigmine is not a disinterest and is not a Luxemburger. sent8: that if the linuron is not the Luxemburger but it enlightens that the linuron is not horary is not incorrect is not wrong. sent9: if the linuron is structural then the fact that the neostigmine is not a disinterest and it is not Luxemburger is not right. sent10: something that is not a lull and is not a disinterest is non-structural. sent11: the neostigmine is not a lull if it is a kind of a disinterest and it is not a Luxemburger. sent12: if the linuron is not structural then that the neostigmine is a disinterest that is not Luxemburger is not true. sent13: that the neostigmine is a disinterest but it is not a kind of a Luxemburger is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neostigmine is both not a disinterest and not a Luxemburger.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the neostigmine is not a kind of a disinterest and it is not Luxemburger is not right if the linuron is not structural. ; $context$ = sent1: the neostigmine is not a disinterest. sent2: the linuron is not a kind of a disinterest. sent3: if something that is a disinterest is not a Luxemburger then that it is not a kind of a lull hold. sent4: the linuron is structural if the neostigmine does not lull. sent5: if the linuron is not a lull then the fact that the neostigmine is non-Luxemburger and it is not structural is wrong. sent6: if the linuron is not structural then the fact that the neostigmine is not a disinterest but it is a Luxemburger is incorrect. sent7: if the linuron is non-structural the neostigmine is not a disinterest and is not a Luxemburger. sent8: that if the linuron is not the Luxemburger but it enlightens that the linuron is not horary is not incorrect is not wrong. sent9: if the linuron is structural then the fact that the neostigmine is not a disinterest and it is not Luxemburger is not right. sent10: something that is not a lull and is not a disinterest is non-structural. sent11: the neostigmine is not a lull if it is a kind of a disinterest and it is not a Luxemburger. sent12: if the linuron is not structural then that the neostigmine is a disinterest that is not Luxemburger is not true. sent13: that the neostigmine is a disinterest but it is not a kind of a Luxemburger is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neostigmine is both not a disinterest and not a Luxemburger.; __UNKNOWN__