that not the shearing but the maladaptiveness happens if the choralness occurs does not hold.
sent1: both the lamentation and the couture occurs if the collecting dukedom does not occur. sent2: the flabbergasting opsonin leads to the maladaptiveness. sent3: the flabbergasting Bruch and the flabbergasting soapwort occurs. sent4: the non-choralness is caused by that the lamentation occurs or that the collecting dukedom does not occur or both. sent5: the lamentation occurs and/or the collecting dukedom happens. sent6: the fact that either the nontoxicness does not occur or the arrogating does not occur or both is not right if the flabbergasting soapwort occurs. sent7: the branchiateness and the flabbergasting opsonin occurs if the lamentation does not occur. sent8: if the fact that either the nontoxicness does not occur or the arrogating does not occur or both is wrong then the shears does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lamentation occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the lamentation happens and/or the collecting dukedom does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the choralness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the choralness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the lamentation does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the branchiateness happens and the flabbergasting opsonin occurs.; int5 -> int6: the flabbergasting opsonin occurs.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: that the maladaptiveness happens is not false.; sent3 -> int8: the flabbergasting soapwort happens.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: that the nontoxicness does not occur and/or the arrogating does not occur does not hold.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the shears does not occur.; int7 & int10 -> int11: not the shears but the maladaptiveness occurs.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the couture happens.
$hypothesis$ = that not the shearing but the maladaptiveness happens if the choralness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: both the lamentation and the couture occurs if the collecting dukedom does not occur. sent2: the flabbergasting opsonin leads to the maladaptiveness. sent3: the flabbergasting Bruch and the flabbergasting soapwort occurs. sent4: the non-choralness is caused by that the lamentation occurs or that the collecting dukedom does not occur or both. sent5: the lamentation occurs and/or the collecting dukedom happens. sent6: the fact that either the nontoxicness does not occur or the arrogating does not occur or both is not right if the flabbergasting soapwort occurs. sent7: the branchiateness and the flabbergasting opsonin occurs if the lamentation does not occur. sent8: if the fact that either the nontoxicness does not occur or the arrogating does not occur or both is wrong then the shears does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lamentation occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the lamentation happens and/or the collecting dukedom does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the choralness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the choralness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the lamentation does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the branchiateness happens and the flabbergasting opsonin occurs.; int5 -> int6: the flabbergasting opsonin occurs.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: that the maladaptiveness happens is not false.; sent3 -> int8: the flabbergasting soapwort happens.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: that the nontoxicness does not occur and/or the arrogating does not occur does not hold.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the shears does not occur.; int7 & int10 -> int11: not the shears but the maladaptiveness occurs.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__