the thigh is not reproducible.
sent1: the hadron is reproducible if there exists something such that the fact that it is fragrant thing that is not naturistic does not hold. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is naturistic and it is not a kind of an aquatic does not hold then the thigh is reproducible. sent3: the stepbrother is fragrant and is vibrational. sent4: the stepbrother is reproducible and it is fragrant. sent5: the crevice is fragrant if the fact that the hadron is naturistic but it is not a kind of an aquatic is not false. sent6: the grama is lossy and it does hold. sent7: if the crevice is naturistic and is an aquatic the hadron is fragrant. sent8: if the stepbrother is both fragrant and vibrational the hadron is not fragrant. sent9: if the stepbrother is an aquatic and it is vibrational the crevice is fragrant. sent10: the hadron is fragrant if the crevice is naturistic but it is not an aquatic. sent11: the thigh is a Heracleum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crevice is naturistic and is not a kind of an aquatic.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the hadron is fragrant.; sent8 & sent3 -> int2: the hadron is not fragrant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the crevice is naturistic but it is not an aquatic does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is naturistic and is not aquatic is not right.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the thigh is not reproducible. ; $context$ = sent1: the hadron is reproducible if there exists something such that the fact that it is fragrant thing that is not naturistic does not hold. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is naturistic and it is not a kind of an aquatic does not hold then the thigh is reproducible. sent3: the stepbrother is fragrant and is vibrational. sent4: the stepbrother is reproducible and it is fragrant. sent5: the crevice is fragrant if the fact that the hadron is naturistic but it is not a kind of an aquatic is not false. sent6: the grama is lossy and it does hold. sent7: if the crevice is naturistic and is an aquatic the hadron is fragrant. sent8: if the stepbrother is both fragrant and vibrational the hadron is not fragrant. sent9: if the stepbrother is an aquatic and it is vibrational the crevice is fragrant. sent10: the hadron is fragrant if the crevice is naturistic but it is not an aquatic. sent11: the thigh is a Heracleum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crevice is naturistic and is not a kind of an aquatic.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the hadron is fragrant.; sent8 & sent3 -> int2: the hadron is not fragrant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the crevice is naturistic but it is not an aquatic does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is naturistic and is not aquatic is not right.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__