the fact that the yolk is a kind of antidotal thing that glamorizes favoritism does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that it does not madden Minsk. sent2: if the yolk is a kind of an aspirate and/or it glamorizes favoritism then the Castillian does not madden Minsk. sent3: that something is a kind of a glucoside and it does strike skep is not correct if it does not madden Minsk. sent4: the Castillian is a kind of a worthy. sent5: the yolk is a kind of a worthy. sent6: the Castillian is antidotal. sent7: the yolk is antidotal if there is something such that it does not madden Minsk. sent8: if the yolk does not madden Minsk the fact that it is antidotal and it does glamorize favoritism does not hold. sent9: that the fact that the Castillian does concretize maharani and it does remember is incorrect is not false if it is not a worthy. sent10: the fact that the Castillian is not a worthy is right if either the yolk does madden Minsk or it is an aspirate or both. sent11: the Castillian does glamorize favoritism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the yolk maddens Minsk.; assump1 -> int1: the yolk does madden Minsk or it is a kind of an aspirate or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the Castillian is not a worthy is not false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the yolk does not madden Minsk.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the orphrey is a glucoside and it strikes skep is not correct.
sent3 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the orphrey is a kind of a glucoside that does strike skep does not hold is not wrong if it does not madden Minsk.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the yolk is a kind of antidotal thing that glamorizes favoritism does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does not madden Minsk. sent2: if the yolk is a kind of an aspirate and/or it glamorizes favoritism then the Castillian does not madden Minsk. sent3: that something is a kind of a glucoside and it does strike skep is not correct if it does not madden Minsk. sent4: the Castillian is a kind of a worthy. sent5: the yolk is a kind of a worthy. sent6: the Castillian is antidotal. sent7: the yolk is antidotal if there is something such that it does not madden Minsk. sent8: if the yolk does not madden Minsk the fact that it is antidotal and it does glamorize favoritism does not hold. sent9: that the fact that the Castillian does concretize maharani and it does remember is incorrect is not false if it is not a worthy. sent10: the fact that the Castillian is not a worthy is right if either the yolk does madden Minsk or it is an aspirate or both. sent11: the Castillian does glamorize favoritism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the yolk maddens Minsk.; assump1 -> int1: the yolk does madden Minsk or it is a kind of an aspirate or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the Castillian is not a worthy is not false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the yolk does not madden Minsk.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__