that the relacing Janissary happens is not wrong.
sent1: the elegiacness does not occur. sent2: the relacing Janissary occurs if the calculating occurs. sent3: if that both the relacing Janissary and the non-on-lineness happens does not hold then the relacing Janissary does not occur. sent4: if the pluralness happens the occupationalness occurs. sent5: the on-lineness does not occur. sent6: the ferricness occurs. sent7: the dioeciousness happens. sent8: that the totemicness happens is caused by the greensness. sent9: that the struggle happens and the justifying great-uncle does not occur triggers the oculism. sent10: the relacing ampersand occurs. sent11: the calculating is caused by the formalisticness. sent12: the tryst occurs if the proximalness happens.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the ferricness but not the on-lineness occurs.;
that the relacing Janissary does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the relacing Janissary happens is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the elegiacness does not occur. sent2: the relacing Janissary occurs if the calculating occurs. sent3: if that both the relacing Janissary and the non-on-lineness happens does not hold then the relacing Janissary does not occur. sent4: if the pluralness happens the occupationalness occurs. sent5: the on-lineness does not occur. sent6: the ferricness occurs. sent7: the dioeciousness happens. sent8: that the totemicness happens is caused by the greensness. sent9: that the struggle happens and the justifying great-uncle does not occur triggers the oculism. sent10: the relacing ampersand occurs. sent11: the calculating is caused by the formalisticness. sent12: the tryst occurs if the proximalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the ferricness but not the on-lineness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__