the fact that there exists something such that if it is parturient then the fact that it is both a right-handedness and not a kick is false is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is parturient that it is a right-handedness and is a kick does not hold. sent2: if something is flimsy the fact that it is parturient and it does not moor puddler is incorrect. sent3: the tortoiseshell is a kind of a pillbox but it does not kick if it is a counterperson. sent4: the fact that something is a kick and not scalable is wrong if it does besiege scission. sent5: if the tortoiseshell is not non-parturient then that it is a right-handedness and it does not kick is not right. sent6: if the tortoiseshell is parturient then it is a right-handedness that does not kick. sent7: if the tortoiseshell is a right-handedness then that it is a wink and it is orbital is not true. sent8: if the tortoiseshell is parturient the fact that it is both a right-handedness and a kick is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it props scorcher then the fact that it is not inefficient and it is not addictive is false. sent10: the icaco is inexplicable but it is not a kick if that it is unsatisfactory hold. sent11: if the tortoiseshell is a kind of a beaugregory then that it is parturient and it does not besiege drop-leaf is false. sent12: if the puddler is heterocercal then that it is parturient and besieges vaginismus is not right. sent13: there is something such that if it is parturient it is a right-handedness and it does not kick. sent14: the fact that the bestiary is a kind of botulinal thing that is not a vocabulary is false if it is a kick.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the shimmy is flimsy then that it is parturient and it does not moor puddler is not true.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is parturient then the fact that it is both a right-handedness and not a kick is false is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is parturient that it is a right-handedness and is a kick does not hold. sent2: if something is flimsy the fact that it is parturient and it does not moor puddler is incorrect. sent3: the tortoiseshell is a kind of a pillbox but it does not kick if it is a counterperson. sent4: the fact that something is a kick and not scalable is wrong if it does besiege scission. sent5: if the tortoiseshell is not non-parturient then that it is a right-handedness and it does not kick is not right. sent6: if the tortoiseshell is parturient then it is a right-handedness that does not kick. sent7: if the tortoiseshell is a right-handedness then that it is a wink and it is orbital is not true. sent8: if the tortoiseshell is parturient the fact that it is both a right-handedness and a kick is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it props scorcher then the fact that it is not inefficient and it is not addictive is false. sent10: the icaco is inexplicable but it is not a kick if that it is unsatisfactory hold. sent11: if the tortoiseshell is a kind of a beaugregory then that it is parturient and it does not besiege drop-leaf is false. sent12: if the puddler is heterocercal then that it is parturient and besieges vaginismus is not right. sent13: there is something such that if it is parturient it is a right-handedness and it does not kick. sent14: the fact that the bestiary is a kind of botulinal thing that is not a vocabulary is false if it is a kick. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__