there is something such that if it is not hepatic that that it is not a kind of a touch and it is a chess is correct is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not hepatic it does not touch and is a kind of a chess. sent2: that the putz does not achromatize putz and is a deep-freeze does not hold if that it does not assimilate is correct. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of non-hepatic thing that is a warthog is incorrect if it does not gate eddy. sent4: that that the mayhaw is a touch and a chess is correct is not right if it is not hepatic. sent5: if the mayhaw is not hepatic then it does not touch and it is a chess. sent6: the mayhaw is non-anaclitic thing that is truthful if it is not a kind of a chess. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not hepatic that it is a touch and is a kind of a chess is false. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a oyster-fish that it is a kind of a snowmobile and it is a kind of a Bratislava is not correct hold. sent9: if the mayhaw is not hepatic that it does not touch and it is a chess does not hold. sent10: that something is not a touch but it is black is not true if it is not a desideratum. sent11: the fact that the stirrer is not a Cataflam but it does prime maltose is not true if it is not unsociable.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
if the manganese is not a desideratum then that it is both not a touch and a black does not hold.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not hepatic that that it is not a kind of a touch and it is a chess is correct is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not hepatic it does not touch and is a kind of a chess. sent2: that the putz does not achromatize putz and is a deep-freeze does not hold if that it does not assimilate is correct. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of non-hepatic thing that is a warthog is incorrect if it does not gate eddy. sent4: that that the mayhaw is a touch and a chess is correct is not right if it is not hepatic. sent5: if the mayhaw is not hepatic then it does not touch and it is a chess. sent6: the mayhaw is non-anaclitic thing that is truthful if it is not a kind of a chess. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not hepatic that it is a touch and is a kind of a chess is false. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a oyster-fish that it is a kind of a snowmobile and it is a kind of a Bratislava is not correct hold. sent9: if the mayhaw is not hepatic that it does not touch and it is a chess does not hold. sent10: that something is not a touch but it is black is not true if it is not a desideratum. sent11: the fact that the stirrer is not a Cataflam but it does prime maltose is not true if it is not unsociable. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__