the fact that the Etonian does not preponderate is not incorrect.
sent1: the fact that something is not dormant and does not brief convincingness does not hold if it is not a kind of a DA. sent2: the Etonian does not preponderate if something does not incorporate Sophora and is a kind of a boatswain. sent3: if the applicator is nonspecific then the keyboardist is a kind of a dishonor. sent4: the dinghy does not preponderate. sent5: the Etonian does not preponderate if something incorporates Sophora and is a boatswain. sent6: the yacca is nonspecific if the fact that it tinsels Munich is not false. sent7: if that something is not dormant and it does not brief convincingness is false it brief convincingness. sent8: the yacca incorporates Camus. sent9: if something briefs convincingness it is not a pearl but Eucharistic. sent10: if something transforms but it is not a groaner then it is not a DA. sent11: if the yacca is phosphorous then it does tinsel Munich. sent12: the Mesoamerican does transform but it is not a kind of a groaner if there exists something such that it is not a Shua. sent13: if the yacca incorporates Camus it is phosphorous. sent14: the Nganasan is a kind of a bioclimatology if the keyboardist is a dishonor. sent15: if the Nganasan is a kind of a bioclimatology then the alcohol is a bioclimatology. sent16: there exists something such that it is not a Shua. sent17: if that the applicator is a balloon is correct the keyboardist is a dishonor. sent18: if there exists something such that it is both not a pearl and Eucharistic then the alcohol is not a kind of a gymslip. sent19: if there is something such that it is nonspecific then the applicator balloons and/or is nonspecific.
the Etonian preponderates.
sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the yacca is phosphorous.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the yacca tinsels Munich.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the yacca is nonspecific.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is nonspecific.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the applicator does balloon and/or it is nonspecific.; int5 & sent17 & sent3 -> int6: the keyboardist does dishonor.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the Nganasan is a kind of a bioclimatology.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the alcohol is a kind of a bioclimatology.; sent9 -> int9: if the Mesoamerican does brief convincingness it does not pearl and is Eucharistic.; sent7 -> int10: the Mesoamerican briefs convincingness if that it is a kind of non-dormant thing that does not briefs convincingness is not correct.; sent1 -> int11: if the Mesoamerican is not a DA the fact that it is non-dormant thing that does not brief convincingness does not hold.; sent10 -> int12: the fact that the Mesoamerican is not a kind of a DA hold if it transforms and is not a groaner.; sent16 & sent12 -> int13: the Mesoamerican does transform and is not a groaner.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the Mesoamerican is not a DA.; int11 & int14 -> int15: that the Mesoamerican is not dormant and does not brief convincingness is wrong.; int10 & int15 -> int16: the Mesoamerican does brief convincingness.; int9 & int16 -> int17: the Mesoamerican is not a pearl and is Eucharistic.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is both not a pearl and Eucharistic.; int18 & sent18 -> int19: the fact that the alcohol is not a gymslip is right.; int8 & int19 -> int20: the alcohol is a kind of a bioclimatology that is not a kind of a gymslip.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that it is both a bioclimatology and not a gymslip.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Etonian does not preponderate is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not dormant and does not brief convincingness does not hold if it is not a kind of a DA. sent2: the Etonian does not preponderate if something does not incorporate Sophora and is a kind of a boatswain. sent3: if the applicator is nonspecific then the keyboardist is a kind of a dishonor. sent4: the dinghy does not preponderate. sent5: the Etonian does not preponderate if something incorporates Sophora and is a boatswain. sent6: the yacca is nonspecific if the fact that it tinsels Munich is not false. sent7: if that something is not dormant and it does not brief convincingness is false it brief convincingness. sent8: the yacca incorporates Camus. sent9: if something briefs convincingness it is not a pearl but Eucharistic. sent10: if something transforms but it is not a groaner then it is not a DA. sent11: if the yacca is phosphorous then it does tinsel Munich. sent12: the Mesoamerican does transform but it is not a kind of a groaner if there exists something such that it is not a Shua. sent13: if the yacca incorporates Camus it is phosphorous. sent14: the Nganasan is a kind of a bioclimatology if the keyboardist is a dishonor. sent15: if the Nganasan is a kind of a bioclimatology then the alcohol is a bioclimatology. sent16: there exists something such that it is not a Shua. sent17: if that the applicator is a balloon is correct the keyboardist is a dishonor. sent18: if there exists something such that it is both not a pearl and Eucharistic then the alcohol is not a kind of a gymslip. sent19: if there is something such that it is nonspecific then the applicator balloons and/or is nonspecific. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__