the abalone does wrap polyploidy.
sent1: if the jessamine does rage Lucullus the abalone does wrap polyploidy. sent2: that the bratwurst is not hydrophilic is not incorrect if the jessamine does not rage Lucullus and is hydrophilic. sent3: the bratwurst wraps Macaulay if the muesli is a wobbler. sent4: if the bratwurst does wrap Macaulay the fact that the jessamine does wrap Macaulay and is not hydrophilic is not right. sent5: if something does not wrap Macaulay then it does rage Lucullus. sent6: if the fact that something wraps Macaulay but it is not hydrophilic is not right then it does rage Lucullus. sent7: the muesli is a kind of a wobbler and it constructs vitalist.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the muesli is a wobbler is correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the bratwurst wraps Macaulay is right.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the jessamine does wrap Macaulay but it is not hydrophilic is not true.; sent6 -> int4: if that the jessamine wraps Macaulay but it is not hydrophilic is not true then it does rage Lucullus.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the jessamine does rage Lucullus.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the booster does construct vitalist.
$hypothesis$ = the abalone does wrap polyploidy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the jessamine does rage Lucullus the abalone does wrap polyploidy. sent2: that the bratwurst is not hydrophilic is not incorrect if the jessamine does not rage Lucullus and is hydrophilic. sent3: the bratwurst wraps Macaulay if the muesli is a wobbler. sent4: if the bratwurst does wrap Macaulay the fact that the jessamine does wrap Macaulay and is not hydrophilic is not right. sent5: if something does not wrap Macaulay then it does rage Lucullus. sent6: if the fact that something wraps Macaulay but it is not hydrophilic is not right then it does rage Lucullus. sent7: the muesli is a kind of a wobbler and it constructs vitalist. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the muesli is a wobbler is correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the bratwurst wraps Macaulay is right.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the jessamine does wrap Macaulay but it is not hydrophilic is not true.; sent6 -> int4: if that the jessamine wraps Macaulay but it is not hydrophilic is not true then it does rage Lucullus.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the jessamine does rage Lucullus.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__