the snuffling intermission happens.
sent1: the ministry happens if the cyclothymicness happens. sent2: if the tooling glucose occurs the bronchoscopicness happens. sent3: that the tooling Stieglitz and the snuffling intermission happens does not hold if the losing does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the bronchoscopicness occurs but the tooling glucose does not occur is not true then the immunocompetentness does not occur. sent5: the ministry does not occur if that the cyclothymicness but not the losing happens does not hold. sent6: the bear does not occur and the botryoidness does not occur. sent7: if the tooling glucose does not occur then that the tooling inaudibility does not occur and the kiss does not occur is false. sent8: the ministry occurs if the losing happens. sent9: the snuffling intermission does not occur if the hydrolyzableness does not occur. sent10: that the ministry does not occur and the hydrolyzableness happens is brought about by that the cyclothymicness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the snuffling intermission does not occur and the tooling glucose does not occur is wrong if the bronchoscopicness does not occur. sent12: the tooling inaudibility does not occur and the kiss does not occur. sent13: the tooling magnetism happens if the snuffling muzzle occurs. sent14: the non-hydrolyzableness is triggered by that the bronchoscopicness occurs and the ministry happens. sent15: the tooling inaudibility does not occur. sent16: the losing or the cyclothymicness or both happens. sent17: the fact that the tooling inaudibility happens and the kiss does not occur is not true. sent18: that the bloodlessness does not occur is prevented by that the paganizing happens. sent19: the fact that the bronchoscopicness happens but the tooling glucose does not occur is not correct if the ministry does not occur. sent20: the tooling Stieglitz does not occur if the fact that both the tooling Stieglitz and the snuffling intermission happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tooling glucose does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the tooling inaudibility does not occur and the kissing does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the tooling glucose happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the bronchoscopicness occurs.; sent16 & sent8 & sent1 -> int5: the ministry happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bronchoscopicness and the ministry happens.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the hydrolyzableness does not occur.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the immunocompetentness does not occur and the tooling Stieglitz does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the snuffling intermission happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the ministry happens if the cyclothymicness happens. sent2: if the tooling glucose occurs the bronchoscopicness happens. sent3: that the tooling Stieglitz and the snuffling intermission happens does not hold if the losing does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the bronchoscopicness occurs but the tooling glucose does not occur is not true then the immunocompetentness does not occur. sent5: the ministry does not occur if that the cyclothymicness but not the losing happens does not hold. sent6: the bear does not occur and the botryoidness does not occur. sent7: if the tooling glucose does not occur then that the tooling inaudibility does not occur and the kiss does not occur is false. sent8: the ministry occurs if the losing happens. sent9: the snuffling intermission does not occur if the hydrolyzableness does not occur. sent10: that the ministry does not occur and the hydrolyzableness happens is brought about by that the cyclothymicness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the snuffling intermission does not occur and the tooling glucose does not occur is wrong if the bronchoscopicness does not occur. sent12: the tooling inaudibility does not occur and the kiss does not occur. sent13: the tooling magnetism happens if the snuffling muzzle occurs. sent14: the non-hydrolyzableness is triggered by that the bronchoscopicness occurs and the ministry happens. sent15: the tooling inaudibility does not occur. sent16: the losing or the cyclothymicness or both happens. sent17: the fact that the tooling inaudibility happens and the kiss does not occur is not true. sent18: that the bloodlessness does not occur is prevented by that the paganizing happens. sent19: the fact that the bronchoscopicness happens but the tooling glucose does not occur is not correct if the ministry does not occur. sent20: the tooling Stieglitz does not occur if the fact that both the tooling Stieglitz and the snuffling intermission happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tooling glucose does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the tooling inaudibility does not occur and the kissing does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the tooling glucose happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the bronchoscopicness occurs.; sent16 & sent8 & sent1 -> int5: the ministry happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bronchoscopicness and the ministry happens.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the hydrolyzableness does not occur.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__