if the mug does administer feverfew then the sturgeon is a kind of a Antiguan.
sent1: the conchologist quietens sturgeon if something is a masseuse and it administers feverfew. sent2: if the mug is not a levirate and administers feverfew it is noncellular. sent3: if the fact that the conchologist does quieten sturgeon is not wrong then the sturgeon is not noncellular and it is not a stockcar. sent4: if something intussuscepts that the antipasto is both not a levirate and carvel-built is not right. sent5: there exists something such that it is totemic. sent6: if the mug is a stockcar then the sturgeon is not a kind of a masseuse. sent7: if that the antipasto is a masseuse is right then the fact that it is a kind of non-carvel-built thing that is not a levirate is not correct. sent8: something does not storm and does intussuscept if that it is a levirate hold. sent9: the antipasto is a masseuse if the mug is a kind of a levirate. sent10: there exists something such that it does intussuscept. sent11: if the conchologist does quieten sturgeon then that the sturgeon is cellular is not false. sent12: the conchologist is a stockcar. sent13: if the antipasto does not quieten sturgeon and/or it is a masseuse then it is a masseuse. sent14: if something is not noncellular and it is not a kind of a stockcar then it is a Antiguan.
sent10 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the antipasto is both not a levirate and carvel-built is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mug does administer feverfew.; sent14 -> int2: that the sturgeon is a kind of a Antiguan is right if that it is not noncellular and it is not a stockcar is not wrong.;
the fact that the sauceboat is both not a purr and a storm is incorrect.
sent8 -> int3: the antipasto is not a storm but it does intussuscept if it is a levirate.;
$hypothesis$ = if the mug does administer feverfew then the sturgeon is a kind of a Antiguan. ; $context$ = sent1: the conchologist quietens sturgeon if something is a masseuse and it administers feverfew. sent2: if the mug is not a levirate and administers feverfew it is noncellular. sent3: if the fact that the conchologist does quieten sturgeon is not wrong then the sturgeon is not noncellular and it is not a stockcar. sent4: if something intussuscepts that the antipasto is both not a levirate and carvel-built is not right. sent5: there exists something such that it is totemic. sent6: if the mug is a stockcar then the sturgeon is not a kind of a masseuse. sent7: if that the antipasto is a masseuse is right then the fact that it is a kind of non-carvel-built thing that is not a levirate is not correct. sent8: something does not storm and does intussuscept if that it is a levirate hold. sent9: the antipasto is a masseuse if the mug is a kind of a levirate. sent10: there exists something such that it does intussuscept. sent11: if the conchologist does quieten sturgeon then that the sturgeon is cellular is not false. sent12: the conchologist is a stockcar. sent13: if the antipasto does not quieten sturgeon and/or it is a masseuse then it is a masseuse. sent14: if something is not noncellular and it is not a kind of a stockcar then it is a Antiguan. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the antipasto is both not a levirate and carvel-built is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mug does administer feverfew.; sent14 -> int2: that the sturgeon is a kind of a Antiguan is right if that it is not noncellular and it is not a stockcar is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__