the picturing occurs.
sent1: that the secularization happens does not hold. sent2: the picturing is triggered by that the touchdown happens. sent3: the fastness does not occur. sent4: if the binocularsness happens that the frosting happens is true. sent5: the fact that not the ferrimagnetism but the Mancunian occurs is not correct if the fastness does not occur. sent6: that the binocularsness happens and the carcinogenicness occurs does not hold. sent7: if the flashing does not occur the Mancunianness happens. sent8: the flashing does not occur or the touchdown occurs or both if the fast occurs. sent9: if that the flashing does not occur is true then the ferrimagnetism does not occur but the Mancunianness happens. sent10: the staling CER does not occur. sent11: the Mancunianness happens. sent12: if the connivance happens the handover happens. sent13: the unmaliciousness does not occur if the fact that the smashing cereal does not occur but the collaring happens is wrong. sent14: the non-unmaliciousness triggers that the privation and the fastness happens. sent15: if the alularness occurs the intermezzo occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flashing does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the ferrimagnetism does not occur but the Mancunian happens.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: that not the ferrimagnetism but the Mancunian occurs is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the flashing happens.;
the empiricalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the picturing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the secularization happens does not hold. sent2: the picturing is triggered by that the touchdown happens. sent3: the fastness does not occur. sent4: if the binocularsness happens that the frosting happens is true. sent5: the fact that not the ferrimagnetism but the Mancunian occurs is not correct if the fastness does not occur. sent6: that the binocularsness happens and the carcinogenicness occurs does not hold. sent7: if the flashing does not occur the Mancunianness happens. sent8: the flashing does not occur or the touchdown occurs or both if the fast occurs. sent9: if that the flashing does not occur is true then the ferrimagnetism does not occur but the Mancunianness happens. sent10: the staling CER does not occur. sent11: the Mancunianness happens. sent12: if the connivance happens the handover happens. sent13: the unmaliciousness does not occur if the fact that the smashing cereal does not occur but the collaring happens is wrong. sent14: the non-unmaliciousness triggers that the privation and the fastness happens. sent15: if the alularness occurs the intermezzo occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flashing does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the ferrimagnetism does not occur but the Mancunian happens.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: that not the ferrimagnetism but the Mancunian occurs is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the flashing happens.; __UNKNOWN__