that the stakeout does not occur if the fact that the mew does not occur hold is not true.
sent1: that the structuralness does not occur is prevented by that the mew does not occur and the subrogating grazing does not occur. sent2: that the boisterousness does not occur is triggered by that not the bundling cretinism but the cormousness occurs. sent3: the dissociating occurs but the north does not occur. sent4: the lysogenizing Tecumseh does not occur and the Zambian happens if the incommutableness happens. sent5: the bundling saute happens. sent6: the stakeout is prevented by that the nephrotomy does not occur but the bisontineness occurs. sent7: the honk happens. sent8: if the fact that not the stakeout but the bisontineness happens is wrong then the nephrotomy does not occur. sent9: the structuralness leads to that that the nephrotomy does not occur and the bisontineness occurs is not false. sent10: the subrogating grazing does not occur if the dissociating and the non-northness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mew does not occur.; sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the subrogating grazing does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the mewing does not occur and the subrogating grazing does not occur.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: that the structuralness occurs is right.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: not the nephrotomy but the bisontineness occurs.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the stakeout does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the lotto does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the stakeout does not occur if the fact that the mew does not occur hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the structuralness does not occur is prevented by that the mew does not occur and the subrogating grazing does not occur. sent2: that the boisterousness does not occur is triggered by that not the bundling cretinism but the cormousness occurs. sent3: the dissociating occurs but the north does not occur. sent4: the lysogenizing Tecumseh does not occur and the Zambian happens if the incommutableness happens. sent5: the bundling saute happens. sent6: the stakeout is prevented by that the nephrotomy does not occur but the bisontineness occurs. sent7: the honk happens. sent8: if the fact that not the stakeout but the bisontineness happens is wrong then the nephrotomy does not occur. sent9: the structuralness leads to that that the nephrotomy does not occur and the bisontineness occurs is not false. sent10: the subrogating grazing does not occur if the dissociating and the non-northness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mew does not occur.; sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the subrogating grazing does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the mewing does not occur and the subrogating grazing does not occur.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: that the structuralness occurs is right.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: not the nephrotomy but the bisontineness occurs.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the stakeout does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__