the non-sarcolemmalness and/or the non-antecedentness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the Faustianness does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the sampling coriander happens is correct. sent2: the vindication happens. sent3: the sarcolemmalness or the non-antecedentness or both occurs if the combustion does not occur. sent4: the sarcolemmalness does not occur or the antecedent occurs or both. sent5: the oneiricness happens and/or the inflating tortoise does not occur if the unsoldness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the inflating scolopendrium does not occur and the aweing occurs does not hold if the session does not occur. sent7: if the combustion does not occur then the fact that the non-sarcolemmalness and/or the non-antecedentness occurs is not wrong. sent8: that the colorcasting does not occur is triggered by that the peek does not occur and the inflating Asin happens. sent9: the fact that the inflating autofluorescence or the non-succinicness or both occurs hold. sent10: if the peek happens the fact that the diametralness occurs hold. sent11: if the sampling Friday does not occur the inflating methicillin does not occur and/or the sampling cachalot occurs. sent12: that the diametralness occurs but the inflating Asin does not occur is brought about by that the peek occurs. sent13: the waterspout occurs and the schematizing does not occur. sent14: that the inflating Obadiah happens is prevented by that the clouding titmouse happens. sent15: the palpableness but not the dilating happens. sent16: that the sampling coriander happens is triggered by that the diametralness but not the inflating Asin occurs. sent17: if the masterstroke happens the enrichment and the belliedness happens. sent18: either the sprinkle does not occur or the waterspout does not occur or both if the Rooseveltianness does not occur. sent19: the inflating Meir does not occur. sent20: that the Faustianness does not occur results in that the combustion does not occur. sent21: that not the inflating Meir but the clouding syllogism occurs does not hold if the peek does not occur. sent22: the fact that the clouding syllogism occurs is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the peek does not occur is correct.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the inflating Meir but the clouding syllogism occurs is false.; sent19 & sent22 -> int2: not the inflating Meir but the clouding syllogism occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the peek happens.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the diametralness happens and the inflating Asin does not occur.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the sampling coriander happens.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the Faustianness does not occur.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: that the combustion does not occur hold.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the non-sarcolemmalness and/or the non-antecedentness occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the non-sarcolemmalness and/or the non-antecedentness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Faustianness does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the sampling coriander happens is correct. sent2: the vindication happens. sent3: the sarcolemmalness or the non-antecedentness or both occurs if the combustion does not occur. sent4: the sarcolemmalness does not occur or the antecedent occurs or both. sent5: the oneiricness happens and/or the inflating tortoise does not occur if the unsoldness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the inflating scolopendrium does not occur and the aweing occurs does not hold if the session does not occur. sent7: if the combustion does not occur then the fact that the non-sarcolemmalness and/or the non-antecedentness occurs is not wrong. sent8: that the colorcasting does not occur is triggered by that the peek does not occur and the inflating Asin happens. sent9: the fact that the inflating autofluorescence or the non-succinicness or both occurs hold. sent10: if the peek happens the fact that the diametralness occurs hold. sent11: if the sampling Friday does not occur the inflating methicillin does not occur and/or the sampling cachalot occurs. sent12: that the diametralness occurs but the inflating Asin does not occur is brought about by that the peek occurs. sent13: the waterspout occurs and the schematizing does not occur. sent14: that the inflating Obadiah happens is prevented by that the clouding titmouse happens. sent15: the palpableness but not the dilating happens. sent16: that the sampling coriander happens is triggered by that the diametralness but not the inflating Asin occurs. sent17: if the masterstroke happens the enrichment and the belliedness happens. sent18: either the sprinkle does not occur or the waterspout does not occur or both if the Rooseveltianness does not occur. sent19: the inflating Meir does not occur. sent20: that the Faustianness does not occur results in that the combustion does not occur. sent21: that not the inflating Meir but the clouding syllogism occurs does not hold if the peek does not occur. sent22: the fact that the clouding syllogism occurs is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the peek does not occur is correct.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the inflating Meir but the clouding syllogism occurs is false.; sent19 & sent22 -> int2: not the inflating Meir but the clouding syllogism occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the peek happens.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the diametralness happens and the inflating Asin does not occur.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the sampling coriander happens.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the Faustianness does not occur.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: that the combustion does not occur hold.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__