the tinsel is not satyric.
sent1: the IDP is a Peruvian. sent2: The carport does expire carport. sent3: if a playful thing is a ukase then the tinsel is not satyric. sent4: the tinsel is not unplayful. sent5: if the absentee does not expire carport but it is a malnutrition the carport does not expire carport. sent6: if that the carport does expire carport is correct then the absentee is a ukase. sent7: if that something is not Senecan is not wrong then it expires carport and is a malnutrition. sent8: there is something such that it does not expire carport. sent9: if the fact that something is noble thing that is not a wire is not correct it is not Senecan. sent10: the IDP is not a Britisher if the fact that it is Eucharistic and is not a kind of a simoom is wrong. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a dosimetry the absentee is cenobitic and it colonizes. sent12: that the IDP is Eucharistic and not a simoom does not hold if that it is a Peruvian hold. sent13: the carport is not a Astropogon but it is a kind of a revenant if it does not expire carport. sent14: if the IDP is not a Britisher it is not a dosimetry. sent15: something is testamentary and a scholarship if that it is not cenobitic hold. sent16: if something expires carport then it is satyric. sent17: if the absentee is cenobitic and it does colonize then the carport is not cenobitic. sent18: if the carport does expire carport then the absentee is not unplayful but it is a kind of a ukase. sent19: the carport does expire carport.
sent18 & sent19 -> int1: the absentee is not unplayful but it is a ukase.; int1 -> int2: something is playful but it is a ukase.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is not a Astropogon and it is a revenant.
$hypothesis$ = the tinsel is not satyric. ; $context$ = sent1: the IDP is a Peruvian. sent2: The carport does expire carport. sent3: if a playful thing is a ukase then the tinsel is not satyric. sent4: the tinsel is not unplayful. sent5: if the absentee does not expire carport but it is a malnutrition the carport does not expire carport. sent6: if that the carport does expire carport is correct then the absentee is a ukase. sent7: if that something is not Senecan is not wrong then it expires carport and is a malnutrition. sent8: there is something such that it does not expire carport. sent9: if the fact that something is noble thing that is not a wire is not correct it is not Senecan. sent10: the IDP is not a Britisher if the fact that it is Eucharistic and is not a kind of a simoom is wrong. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a dosimetry the absentee is cenobitic and it colonizes. sent12: that the IDP is Eucharistic and not a simoom does not hold if that it is a Peruvian hold. sent13: the carport is not a Astropogon but it is a kind of a revenant if it does not expire carport. sent14: if the IDP is not a Britisher it is not a dosimetry. sent15: something is testamentary and a scholarship if that it is not cenobitic hold. sent16: if something expires carport then it is satyric. sent17: if the absentee is cenobitic and it does colonize then the carport is not cenobitic. sent18: if the carport does expire carport then the absentee is not unplayful but it is a kind of a ukase. sent19: the carport does expire carport. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent19 -> int1: the absentee is not unplayful but it is a ukase.; int1 -> int2: something is playful but it is a ukase.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__