if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a deceptiveness then that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and is not congressional is not right.
sent1: the ezo-yama-hagi is not a tuille if the fact that it does not curvet pincushion and it is not Eucharistic is not correct. sent2: that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness but it is congressional is incorrect if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a kind of a deceptiveness. sent3: that something is a tuille but it is not congressional does not hold if the fact that it does not curvet softheartedness is not wrong. sent4: the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and is not congressional if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a deceptiveness. sent5: the fact that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and is not congressional is not true if that the ezo-yama-hagi is a deceptiveness hold. sent6: the fact that the ezo-yama-hagi does curvet pincushion but it is not Eucharistic is false if it is not a deceptiveness. sent7: that something does not curvet pincushion and it is not Eucharistic is not true if it is not a deceptiveness. sent8: the fact that the pincushion is not a tuille but it is arsenious is not right. sent9: that the ezo-yama-hagi curvets pincushion but it is not Eucharistic is incorrect. sent10: that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and it is not congressional does not hold if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a tuille. sent11: if something is not a deceptiveness that it is congressional thing that does not curvet pincushion is not correct. sent12: if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a tuille then that the fascista does curvet softheartedness and is not congressional is not right.
sent7 -> int1: if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a kind of a deceptiveness then that it does not curvet pincushion and is not Eucharistic does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ezo-yama-hagi is not a kind of a deceptiveness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the ezo-yama-hagi does not curvet pincushion and it is not Eucharistic is wrong.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the ezo-yama-hagi is not a tuille.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and is not congressional does not hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a deceptiveness then that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and is not congressional is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the ezo-yama-hagi is not a tuille if the fact that it does not curvet pincushion and it is not Eucharistic is not correct. sent2: that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness but it is congressional is incorrect if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a kind of a deceptiveness. sent3: that something is a tuille but it is not congressional does not hold if the fact that it does not curvet softheartedness is not wrong. sent4: the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and is not congressional if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a deceptiveness. sent5: the fact that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and is not congressional is not true if that the ezo-yama-hagi is a deceptiveness hold. sent6: the fact that the ezo-yama-hagi does curvet pincushion but it is not Eucharistic is false if it is not a deceptiveness. sent7: that something does not curvet pincushion and it is not Eucharistic is not true if it is not a deceptiveness. sent8: the fact that the pincushion is not a tuille but it is arsenious is not right. sent9: that the ezo-yama-hagi curvets pincushion but it is not Eucharistic is incorrect. sent10: that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and it is not congressional does not hold if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a tuille. sent11: if something is not a deceptiveness that it is congressional thing that does not curvet pincushion is not correct. sent12: if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a tuille then that the fascista does curvet softheartedness and is not congressional is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the ezo-yama-hagi is not a kind of a deceptiveness then that it does not curvet pincushion and is not Eucharistic does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ezo-yama-hagi is not a kind of a deceptiveness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the ezo-yama-hagi does not curvet pincushion and it is not Eucharistic is wrong.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the ezo-yama-hagi is not a tuille.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the fascista does not curvet softheartedness and is not congressional does not hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__