the Marsh is a Conoy.
sent1: something that is not a sixpence is sarcosomal. sent2: that either the antineoplastic is not a ceramic or it is not a ceremony or both is wrong if that the rubbish is not sarcosomal is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the rubbish is not a kind of a positivist and/or it is not a kind of a sixpence is not true if the antineoplastic is not a kind of a sixpence. sent4: the antineoplastic is a reversioner or a agnosia or both if it is sarcosomal. sent5: that the rubbish is not sarcosomal is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it is sarcosomal and it is not a sixpence is not correct. sent6: the Washingtonian is chalybeate if the fact that it does cascade native and is not chalybeate is wrong. sent7: the Marsh is a Conoy if there is something such that that it is either not a positivist or not a sixpence or both is wrong. sent8: that something is both not a rendezvous and a sixpence is not true if it is not a steps. sent9: the fact that the Washingtonian cascades native but it is not chalybeate is not right. sent10: that the whitetail is a Conoy that is chalybeate is not right. sent11: the Marsh does not rendezvous if that the Washingtonian is a kind of a rendezvous that is a positivist does not hold. sent12: if something either is not a kind of a reversioner or is a kind of a agnosia or both then it is not a rendezvous. sent13: the antineoplastic is sarcosomal. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Conoy the fact that the Washingtonian is a kind of a rendezvous and it is a positivist is not right. sent15: if the antineoplastic is sarcosomal either it is not a kind of a reversioner or it is a agnosia or both. sent16: if the rubbish is not a Mandaean then it is not a kind of a Conoy. sent17: the Marsh is a reversioner. sent18: if the fact that something is a Conoy and chalybeate is incorrect then it is not a Conoy. sent19: there is something such that either it is not a kind of a malmsey or it is not echoic or both. sent20: the antineoplastic is not echoic and is bacchantic. sent21: the Washingtonian is a steps but not a positivist if it is chalybeate. sent22: the antineoplastic is not a kind of a steps.
sent15 & sent13 -> int1: either the antineoplastic is not a kind of a reversioner or it is a kind of a agnosia or both.; sent12 -> int2: if the antineoplastic is not a reversioner or is a agnosia or both it does not rendezvous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the antineoplastic is not a rendezvous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antineoplastic is a sixpence.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the antineoplastic is not a kind of a rendezvous but it is a sixpence.; sent8 -> int5: if the antineoplastic does not step then the fact that it is not a rendezvous but a sixpence is not right.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: that the antineoplastic is not a rendezvous but it is a sixpence is wrong.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the antineoplastic is not a sixpence.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: that the rubbish is not a positivist or not a sixpence or both is not correct.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is either not positivist or not a sixpence or both is incorrect.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that that it is not a ceramic and/or it is not a ceremony is wrong.
sent18 -> int11: the whitetail is not a Conoy if that it is a Conoy and is chalybeate is not true.; int11 & sent10 -> int12: the whitetail is not a Conoy.; int12 -> int13: something is not a kind of a Conoy.; int13 & sent14 -> int14: that the Washingtonian does rendezvous and it is a kind of a positivist is not true.; sent11 & int14 -> int15: the Marsh is not a kind of a rendezvous.;
$hypothesis$ = the Marsh is a Conoy. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a sixpence is sarcosomal. sent2: that either the antineoplastic is not a ceramic or it is not a ceremony or both is wrong if that the rubbish is not sarcosomal is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the rubbish is not a kind of a positivist and/or it is not a kind of a sixpence is not true if the antineoplastic is not a kind of a sixpence. sent4: the antineoplastic is a reversioner or a agnosia or both if it is sarcosomal. sent5: that the rubbish is not sarcosomal is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it is sarcosomal and it is not a sixpence is not correct. sent6: the Washingtonian is chalybeate if the fact that it does cascade native and is not chalybeate is wrong. sent7: the Marsh is a Conoy if there is something such that that it is either not a positivist or not a sixpence or both is wrong. sent8: that something is both not a rendezvous and a sixpence is not true if it is not a steps. sent9: the fact that the Washingtonian cascades native but it is not chalybeate is not right. sent10: that the whitetail is a Conoy that is chalybeate is not right. sent11: the Marsh does not rendezvous if that the Washingtonian is a kind of a rendezvous that is a positivist does not hold. sent12: if something either is not a kind of a reversioner or is a kind of a agnosia or both then it is not a rendezvous. sent13: the antineoplastic is sarcosomal. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Conoy the fact that the Washingtonian is a kind of a rendezvous and it is a positivist is not right. sent15: if the antineoplastic is sarcosomal either it is not a kind of a reversioner or it is a agnosia or both. sent16: if the rubbish is not a Mandaean then it is not a kind of a Conoy. sent17: the Marsh is a reversioner. sent18: if the fact that something is a Conoy and chalybeate is incorrect then it is not a Conoy. sent19: there is something such that either it is not a kind of a malmsey or it is not echoic or both. sent20: the antineoplastic is not echoic and is bacchantic. sent21: the Washingtonian is a steps but not a positivist if it is chalybeate. sent22: the antineoplastic is not a kind of a steps. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent13 -> int1: either the antineoplastic is not a kind of a reversioner or it is a kind of a agnosia or both.; sent12 -> int2: if the antineoplastic is not a reversioner or is a agnosia or both it does not rendezvous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the antineoplastic is not a rendezvous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antineoplastic is a sixpence.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the antineoplastic is not a kind of a rendezvous but it is a sixpence.; sent8 -> int5: if the antineoplastic does not step then the fact that it is not a rendezvous but a sixpence is not right.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: that the antineoplastic is not a rendezvous but it is a sixpence is wrong.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the antineoplastic is not a sixpence.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: that the rubbish is not a positivist or not a sixpence or both is not correct.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is either not positivist or not a sixpence or both is incorrect.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__