that the sashimi is not a kind of a swineherd and does not troll calico is not correct.
sent1: the sabbatia is a branchiopod if there exists something such that it trolls supersedure and is a confectionery. sent2: the Colossians trolls supersedure and is a confectionery. sent3: the sashimi is ventral but it does not troll calico if the stockinet is a Ancylus. sent4: if the triacetate trolls soman the caiman does not accelerate Dalton. sent5: the reticulation calms if the fact that the saturation is a kind of a swineherd that is not a calms is false. sent6: if the sashimi is a kind of ventral thing that does not troll calico the puritan does troll calico. sent7: the fact that the sashimi is not a kind of a swineherd and it does not troll calico is incorrect if it is not a Ancylus. sent8: something trolls soman and/or it is pious if that it does not troll triacetate is correct. sent9: if the fact that something is a claw hold then the fact that the saturation is a kind of a swineherd but it is non-calm is wrong. sent10: if the sabbatia is a branchiopod then the triacetate is not a kind of a Romeo. sent11: if the triacetate is not a kind of a Romeo then it does not troll triacetate. sent12: if the caiman does not accelerate Dalton the kid does claw and it is a kind of a microsporophyll. sent13: if the sashimi is a Ancylus then it is ventral. sent14: the sashimi is an impasse. sent15: the sashimi calms. sent16: if that the triacetate is pious is not wrong then the caiman does not accelerate Dalton. sent17: if the sashimi is an impasse and it is ventral then it is not Markovian. sent18: if the reticulation is a calm the canister is Markovian. sent19: the fact that the sashimi does not troll calico hold if the stockinet is a Ancylus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sashimi is a kind of a Ancylus.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the sashimi is ventral.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the sashimi is an impasse and ventral.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the sashimi is not Markovian is not wrong.;
that the puritan trolls calico is correct.
sent8 -> int4: the triacetate trolls soman or it is pious or both if it does not troll triacetate.; sent2 -> int5: something trolls supersedure and it is a confectionery.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the sabbatia is a branchiopod.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the triacetate is not a kind of a Romeo.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: the triacetate does not troll triacetate.; int4 & int8 -> int9: either the triacetate trolls soman or it is pious or both.; int9 & sent4 & sent16 -> int10: the caiman does not accelerate Dalton.; sent12 & int10 -> int11: that the kid is a claw and it is a microsporophyll is not false.; int11 -> int12: the kid is a claw.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it claws.; int13 & sent9 -> int14: that the saturation is a swineherd but it does not calm is not right.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the reticulation calms.; sent18 & int15 -> int16: the canister is Markovian.; int16 -> int17: something is Markovian.;
$hypothesis$ = that the sashimi is not a kind of a swineherd and does not troll calico is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the sabbatia is a branchiopod if there exists something such that it trolls supersedure and is a confectionery. sent2: the Colossians trolls supersedure and is a confectionery. sent3: the sashimi is ventral but it does not troll calico if the stockinet is a Ancylus. sent4: if the triacetate trolls soman the caiman does not accelerate Dalton. sent5: the reticulation calms if the fact that the saturation is a kind of a swineherd that is not a calms is false. sent6: if the sashimi is a kind of ventral thing that does not troll calico the puritan does troll calico. sent7: the fact that the sashimi is not a kind of a swineherd and it does not troll calico is incorrect if it is not a Ancylus. sent8: something trolls soman and/or it is pious if that it does not troll triacetate is correct. sent9: if the fact that something is a claw hold then the fact that the saturation is a kind of a swineherd but it is non-calm is wrong. sent10: if the sabbatia is a branchiopod then the triacetate is not a kind of a Romeo. sent11: if the triacetate is not a kind of a Romeo then it does not troll triacetate. sent12: if the caiman does not accelerate Dalton the kid does claw and it is a kind of a microsporophyll. sent13: if the sashimi is a Ancylus then it is ventral. sent14: the sashimi is an impasse. sent15: the sashimi calms. sent16: if that the triacetate is pious is not wrong then the caiman does not accelerate Dalton. sent17: if the sashimi is an impasse and it is ventral then it is not Markovian. sent18: if the reticulation is a calm the canister is Markovian. sent19: the fact that the sashimi does not troll calico hold if the stockinet is a Ancylus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sashimi is a kind of a Ancylus.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the sashimi is ventral.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the sashimi is an impasse and ventral.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the sashimi is not Markovian is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__