the stem-winder does damage committee.
sent1: that the stem-winder does not damage committee hold if the steps is not insolvent. sent2: the millivoltmeter is not insolvent if there exists something such that it is a effacement. sent3: that the manual is a Spanish that does not bethink uniformed is not true if something is not taxable. sent4: the fact that the conception does bethink uniformed and is vegetative is not correct if the Taoist is not vegetative. sent5: the millivoltmeter is not a special if the fact that the conception bethinks uniformed and is vegetative is not correct. sent6: something is a effacement. sent7: something does not damage committee or is not taxable or both if it is not insolvent. sent8: if that the steps is taxable and it is insolvent does not hold then the stem-winder does not damage committee. sent9: if something is non-vegetative then that the fact that the conception is non-vegetative and it is a special is not wrong is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the steps is taxable and it is insolvent is wrong if the millivoltmeter is not a special. sent11: the manual is not a Spanish. sent12: if that the manual is forgettable and/or does not bethink millivoltmeter is incorrect then the Taoist is non-vegetative. sent13: if the fact that either the millivoltmeter does not damage committee or it is not taxable or both is not false then the Taoist is taxable. sent14: that the manual is forgettable or does not bethink millivoltmeter or both does not hold if it is not Spanish. sent15: if the fact that something is both vegetative and a special is incorrect the fact that it is not a special is not wrong.
sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the fact that either the manual is forgettable or it does not bethink millivoltmeter or both is right is not right.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the Taoist is non-vegetative.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that that the conception does bethink uniformed and is vegetative hold is wrong.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the millivoltmeter is not a kind of a special hold.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the steps is taxable and it is insolvent is false.; sent8 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the conception is not a kind of a special.
sent15 -> int6: if the fact that the fact that the conception is vegetative and a special is not wrong is not true it is not a kind of a special.; sent7 -> int7: if the millivoltmeter is solvent it either does not damage committee or is not taxable or both.; sent6 & sent2 -> int8: the millivoltmeter is not insolvent.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the millivoltmeter does not damage committee and/or it is not taxable.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the Taoist is not taxable.; int10 -> int11: there are nontaxable things.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: that the manual is a kind of a Spanish that does not bethink uniformed is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the stem-winder does damage committee. ; $context$ = sent1: that the stem-winder does not damage committee hold if the steps is not insolvent. sent2: the millivoltmeter is not insolvent if there exists something such that it is a effacement. sent3: that the manual is a Spanish that does not bethink uniformed is not true if something is not taxable. sent4: the fact that the conception does bethink uniformed and is vegetative is not correct if the Taoist is not vegetative. sent5: the millivoltmeter is not a special if the fact that the conception bethinks uniformed and is vegetative is not correct. sent6: something is a effacement. sent7: something does not damage committee or is not taxable or both if it is not insolvent. sent8: if that the steps is taxable and it is insolvent does not hold then the stem-winder does not damage committee. sent9: if something is non-vegetative then that the fact that the conception is non-vegetative and it is a special is not wrong is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the steps is taxable and it is insolvent is wrong if the millivoltmeter is not a special. sent11: the manual is not a Spanish. sent12: if that the manual is forgettable and/or does not bethink millivoltmeter is incorrect then the Taoist is non-vegetative. sent13: if the fact that either the millivoltmeter does not damage committee or it is not taxable or both is not false then the Taoist is taxable. sent14: that the manual is forgettable or does not bethink millivoltmeter or both does not hold if it is not Spanish. sent15: if the fact that something is both vegetative and a special is incorrect the fact that it is not a special is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the fact that either the manual is forgettable or it does not bethink millivoltmeter or both is right is not right.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the Taoist is non-vegetative.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that that the conception does bethink uniformed and is vegetative hold is wrong.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the millivoltmeter is not a kind of a special hold.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the steps is taxable and it is insolvent is false.; sent8 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__