the vernix is not ophthalmic.
sent1: something does not bog llama but it is a chintz if it is a tutsan. sent2: that the ocher either is not a guttural or is ophthalmic or both is not correct. sent3: if the vernix is ophthalmic then the ocher does bog skink or it is artistic or both. sent4: something is non-ophthalmic if it is not diclinous and it is a kind of a blare. sent5: the spadix is not artistic. sent6: the fact that something is diclinous but it is not a blare is incorrect if it does not bog llama. sent7: if the vernix is ophthalmic the ocher does not bog skink and/or is artistic. sent8: either the vernix is not artistic or it is ophthalmic or both. sent9: everything is a tutsan. sent10: the vernix is not artistic. sent11: the fact that the ocher does not bog skink and/or it is ophthalmic is not correct. sent12: the ocher does bog skink and/or it is artistic. sent13: either the ocher is not ophthalmic or it bogs skink or both. sent14: the ocher is not ophthalmic or is artistic or both. sent15: the ocher bogs skink. sent16: the ocher wharfs. sent17: the skink is not diclinous but it is a blare if it does not bog llama. sent18: the Scot does not bog skink. sent19: if the ocher is artistic the fact that the vernix is not ophthalmic and/or it bogs skink is right. sent20: the ocher is either not artistic or a hake or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vernix is ophthalmic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the ocher does not bog skink and/or it is artistic.;
the vernix is ophthalmic.
sent1 -> int2: the politician does not bog llama but it is a kind of a chintz if it is a kind of a tutsan.; sent9 -> int3: the politician is a tutsan.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the politician does not bog llama and is a kind of a chintz.; int4 -> int5: everything does not bog llama and is a kind of a chintz.; int5 -> int6: that the preparation does not bog llama and is a chintz is not wrong.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the preparation does not bog llama is right.; sent6 -> int8: the fact that the preparation is diclinous but it is not a blare is not right if it does not bog llama.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the preparation is diclinous but it is not a blare does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is diclinous and is not a kind of a blare is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the vernix is not ophthalmic. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not bog llama but it is a chintz if it is a tutsan. sent2: that the ocher either is not a guttural or is ophthalmic or both is not correct. sent3: if the vernix is ophthalmic then the ocher does bog skink or it is artistic or both. sent4: something is non-ophthalmic if it is not diclinous and it is a kind of a blare. sent5: the spadix is not artistic. sent6: the fact that something is diclinous but it is not a blare is incorrect if it does not bog llama. sent7: if the vernix is ophthalmic the ocher does not bog skink and/or is artistic. sent8: either the vernix is not artistic or it is ophthalmic or both. sent9: everything is a tutsan. sent10: the vernix is not artistic. sent11: the fact that the ocher does not bog skink and/or it is ophthalmic is not correct. sent12: the ocher does bog skink and/or it is artistic. sent13: either the ocher is not ophthalmic or it bogs skink or both. sent14: the ocher is not ophthalmic or is artistic or both. sent15: the ocher bogs skink. sent16: the ocher wharfs. sent17: the skink is not diclinous but it is a blare if it does not bog llama. sent18: the Scot does not bog skink. sent19: if the ocher is artistic the fact that the vernix is not ophthalmic and/or it bogs skink is right. sent20: the ocher is either not artistic or a hake or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vernix is ophthalmic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the ocher does not bog skink and/or it is artistic.; __UNKNOWN__