there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a anagoge and is not progestational is not correct.
sent1: the racker is a locum if it is carcinomatous and it is not anorthitic. sent2: if that the salal is grassless is not incorrect it does wrest crystallography. sent3: if the racker is both not a anagoge and progestational it is anorthitic. sent4: the racker is a Whitehall if the cordite does prime blockbuster. sent5: if something does wrest crystallography and gates Lepidodendraceae then the councilman does prime queasiness. sent6: either the salal is grassless or it is a Sorbian or both. sent7: there is something such that that it is a anagoge and it is not progestational is not right. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a anagoge but progestational does not hold. sent9: the fact that the racker is not sensorineural but it does hobnail is wrong. sent10: if the racker is not a kind of a anagoge and it is not progestational then it is anorthitic. sent11: if the racker does prime blockbuster then it is not anorthitic. sent12: the fact that the racker is not a anagoge but progestational does not hold. sent13: if the stepfather is not a hobnail the cordite is anorthitic and primes blockbuster. sent14: if the phonebook is both not anorthitic and a hemstitch it is an icon. sent15: if something is a Sorbian it wrests crystallography. sent16: something is not a anagoge and is not progestational. sent17: the salal gates Lepidodendraceae and is uncontroversial. sent18: that the racker is anorthitic is true if it is both a anagoge and not progestational. sent19: if the fact that something is not anorthitic and it does not prime blockbuster is wrong then that it is not a anagoge is true. sent20: the racker is not congregational. sent21: the racker does hobnail and/or it does prime blockbuster. sent22: the fact that the racker is a anagoge but it is non-progestational is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the racker is not a anagoge and is not progestational.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the racker is anorthitic.;
the fact that the drone is not a kind of a anagoge is not false.
sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the drone is not anorthitic and does not prime blockbuster is not correct then it is not a anagoge.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a anagoge and is not progestational is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the racker is a locum if it is carcinomatous and it is not anorthitic. sent2: if that the salal is grassless is not incorrect it does wrest crystallography. sent3: if the racker is both not a anagoge and progestational it is anorthitic. sent4: the racker is a Whitehall if the cordite does prime blockbuster. sent5: if something does wrest crystallography and gates Lepidodendraceae then the councilman does prime queasiness. sent6: either the salal is grassless or it is a Sorbian or both. sent7: there is something such that that it is a anagoge and it is not progestational is not right. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a anagoge but progestational does not hold. sent9: the fact that the racker is not sensorineural but it does hobnail is wrong. sent10: if the racker is not a kind of a anagoge and it is not progestational then it is anorthitic. sent11: if the racker does prime blockbuster then it is not anorthitic. sent12: the fact that the racker is not a anagoge but progestational does not hold. sent13: if the stepfather is not a hobnail the cordite is anorthitic and primes blockbuster. sent14: if the phonebook is both not anorthitic and a hemstitch it is an icon. sent15: if something is a Sorbian it wrests crystallography. sent16: something is not a anagoge and is not progestational. sent17: the salal gates Lepidodendraceae and is uncontroversial. sent18: that the racker is anorthitic is true if it is both a anagoge and not progestational. sent19: if the fact that something is not anorthitic and it does not prime blockbuster is wrong then that it is not a anagoge is true. sent20: the racker is not congregational. sent21: the racker does hobnail and/or it does prime blockbuster. sent22: the fact that the racker is a anagoge but it is non-progestational is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the racker is not a anagoge and is not progestational.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the racker is anorthitic.; __UNKNOWN__