the hash diminishes fruit.
sent1: the defoliant does not shuck and is a kind of an anomaly. sent2: that the hash does diminish fruit is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is unmilitary thing that whomps is not right. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is both unmilitary and aphetic does not hold. sent4: if the hash does not diminish fruit then the fact that the drupelet does whomp and is aphetic is wrong. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it does diminish fruit and is unmilitary is correct is not true then the hash whomps. sent6: the fact that something is aphetic but it does not direct judiciary does not hold if it is a Psittacus. sent7: the cellulose is not aphetic. sent8: if the fact that the cellulose does not diminish fruit is right then the hash does not diminish fruit. sent9: the drupelet does not diminish fruit if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of aphetic thing that does not direct judiciary does not hold. sent10: if the cellulose is not aphetic then that that the drupelet is unmilitary and whomps is wrong hold. sent11: something is a kind of a Psittacus if the fact that it is a kind of a national and is not a inflorescence is incorrect. sent12: something is unmilitary and it whomps. sent13: if that something does not diminish fruit is true either the cellulose does not diminish fruit or it is not a Samoa or both. sent14: if something does not shuck then that it is a kind of a national and is not a inflorescence does not hold.
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the drupelet is unmilitary and it whomps is false.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that that it is a kind of unmilitary thing that does whomp hold is not right.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the hash does not diminish fruit.
sent6 -> int3: if the defoliant is a kind of a Psittacus then the fact that it is a kind of aphetic thing that does not direct judiciary is not correct.; sent11 -> int4: that the defoliant is not a kind of a Psittacus is not right if that it is a national and it is not a inflorescence does not hold.; sent14 -> int5: the fact that the defoliant is national and not a inflorescence is not true if it does not shuck.; sent1 -> int6: the defoliant does not shuck.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the defoliant is national and is not a inflorescence is incorrect.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the defoliant is a Psittacus.; int3 & int8 -> int9: that the defoliant is aphetic and does not direct judiciary is incorrect.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is a kind of aphetic thing that does not direct judiciary does not hold.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the drupelet does not diminish fruit.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it does not diminish fruit.; int12 & sent13 -> int13: the fact that the cellulose does not diminish fruit and/or it is not a kind of a Samoa is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the hash diminishes fruit. ; $context$ = sent1: the defoliant does not shuck and is a kind of an anomaly. sent2: that the hash does diminish fruit is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is unmilitary thing that whomps is not right. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is both unmilitary and aphetic does not hold. sent4: if the hash does not diminish fruit then the fact that the drupelet does whomp and is aphetic is wrong. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it does diminish fruit and is unmilitary is correct is not true then the hash whomps. sent6: the fact that something is aphetic but it does not direct judiciary does not hold if it is a Psittacus. sent7: the cellulose is not aphetic. sent8: if the fact that the cellulose does not diminish fruit is right then the hash does not diminish fruit. sent9: the drupelet does not diminish fruit if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of aphetic thing that does not direct judiciary does not hold. sent10: if the cellulose is not aphetic then that that the drupelet is unmilitary and whomps is wrong hold. sent11: something is a kind of a Psittacus if the fact that it is a kind of a national and is not a inflorescence is incorrect. sent12: something is unmilitary and it whomps. sent13: if that something does not diminish fruit is true either the cellulose does not diminish fruit or it is not a Samoa or both. sent14: if something does not shuck then that it is a kind of a national and is not a inflorescence does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the drupelet is unmilitary and it whomps is false.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that that it is a kind of unmilitary thing that does whomp hold is not right.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__