that there exists something such that if it is an orpiment it is not neocortical and it is not flexible does not hold.
sent1: the treasury is a kind of neocortical thing that is not flexible if it is a kind of an orpiment. sent2: if the trombone is paramedical then it is not an orpiment and it does not talk caff. sent3: that the gleet is both non-biliary and non-sublittoral if the gleet is neocortical is right. sent4: there is something such that if it is an orpiment then it is a kind of non-neocortical thing that is flexible. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Maalox then it is not bibless and not smoky. sent6: there exists something such that if it is puerperal then it does not set and is not cephalic. sent7: the treasury is not flexible if it is a kind of an orpiment. sent8: there exists something such that if it does talk Sabbath then it is not intolerant and is not unshaven. sent9: if something is an orpiment it does not talk anastrophe and does not crank muralist. sent10: if the treasury is an orpiment it is not neocortical and it is not flexible. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a Mali then it is not spineless and it does not talk anastrophe. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of an orpiment is true it is not non-neocortical and it is not flexible. sent13: there exists something such that if it is an orpiment then it is not flexible. sent14: there is something such that if it does talk caff it is both not a nutgrass and not a Buxus. sent15: there exists something such that if it is an orpiment then the fact that it is not neocortical is not wrong.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if the stylet is an orpiment then it does not talk anastrophe and does not crank muralist.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is an orpiment it is not neocortical and it is not flexible does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the treasury is a kind of neocortical thing that is not flexible if it is a kind of an orpiment. sent2: if the trombone is paramedical then it is not an orpiment and it does not talk caff. sent3: that the gleet is both non-biliary and non-sublittoral if the gleet is neocortical is right. sent4: there is something such that if it is an orpiment then it is a kind of non-neocortical thing that is flexible. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Maalox then it is not bibless and not smoky. sent6: there exists something such that if it is puerperal then it does not set and is not cephalic. sent7: the treasury is not flexible if it is a kind of an orpiment. sent8: there exists something such that if it does talk Sabbath then it is not intolerant and is not unshaven. sent9: if something is an orpiment it does not talk anastrophe and does not crank muralist. sent10: if the treasury is an orpiment it is not neocortical and it is not flexible. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a Mali then it is not spineless and it does not talk anastrophe. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of an orpiment is true it is not non-neocortical and it is not flexible. sent13: there exists something such that if it is an orpiment then it is not flexible. sent14: there is something such that if it does talk caff it is both not a nutgrass and not a Buxus. sent15: there exists something such that if it is an orpiment then the fact that it is not neocortical is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__