the pedaler is not a corporal.
sent1: something is not a corporal if it crossbreeds capo. sent2: the tab does not stink alertness if that it is not a Bergman and it is a corporal does not hold. sent3: if that that the pedaler does not well and it is not a kind of a corporal does not hold is correct then the tab does well. sent4: the tab does not stink alertness if that it is not well and it is a Bergman is not true. sent5: that the muskellunge does not crossbreed capo and is a kind of a IBRD is wrong. sent6: something that is not non-well is a corporal. sent7: something is not a kind of a Bergman if that it does not stink alertness and is a well is false. sent8: if the neurotransmitter is onstage the fact that the pedaler is both not a corporal and onstage does not hold. sent9: something is not a kind of a corporal if the fact that it does not crossbreed capo and it is well is wrong. sent10: the neurotransmitter is not onstage if the tab is not a Bergman. sent11: that the pedaler does crossbreed capo and it is a well does not hold. sent12: that the neurotransmitter is not a kind of a corporal and is onstage is not true if the fact that the pedaler is onstage is not incorrect. sent13: that the neurotransmitter is not onstage is correct. sent14: the fact that something is not a primer but it is a Bergman is not right if it wells. sent15: something does not stink alertness and/or is onstage if it is not a well. sent16: the tab is not a Bergman. sent17: if the neurotransmitter does well the fact that the pedaler does not crossbreed capo but it well is not correct. sent18: if the pedaler crossbreeds capo it is not a kind of a corporal. sent19: the fact that the neurotransmitter does not stink alertness and/or it is onstage is wrong if the tab is not a Bergman. sent20: the sertraline is not a corporal. sent21: if the neurotransmitter wells then that the pedaler crossbreeds capo and is a wells is not true.
sent15 -> int1: if the neurotransmitter is not a well it does not stink alertness and/or is onstage.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neurotransmitter is not well.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the neurotransmitter does not stink alertness and/or it is onstage.; sent19 & sent16 -> int3: that the neurotransmitter does not stink alertness and/or is onstage is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the neurotransmitter is well.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: that the pedaler does not crossbreed capo and is a kind of a well is not true.; sent9 -> int7: the pedaler is not a corporal if the fact that it does not crossbreed capo and is a well does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tab is not a kind of a primer but it is a Bergman does not hold.
sent14 -> int8: that the tab is not a primer but it is a Bergman is not correct if it is a well.;
$hypothesis$ = the pedaler is not a corporal. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a corporal if it crossbreeds capo. sent2: the tab does not stink alertness if that it is not a Bergman and it is a corporal does not hold. sent3: if that that the pedaler does not well and it is not a kind of a corporal does not hold is correct then the tab does well. sent4: the tab does not stink alertness if that it is not well and it is a Bergman is not true. sent5: that the muskellunge does not crossbreed capo and is a kind of a IBRD is wrong. sent6: something that is not non-well is a corporal. sent7: something is not a kind of a Bergman if that it does not stink alertness and is a well is false. sent8: if the neurotransmitter is onstage the fact that the pedaler is both not a corporal and onstage does not hold. sent9: something is not a kind of a corporal if the fact that it does not crossbreed capo and it is well is wrong. sent10: the neurotransmitter is not onstage if the tab is not a Bergman. sent11: that the pedaler does crossbreed capo and it is a well does not hold. sent12: that the neurotransmitter is not a kind of a corporal and is onstage is not true if the fact that the pedaler is onstage is not incorrect. sent13: that the neurotransmitter is not onstage is correct. sent14: the fact that something is not a primer but it is a Bergman is not right if it wells. sent15: something does not stink alertness and/or is onstage if it is not a well. sent16: the tab is not a Bergman. sent17: if the neurotransmitter does well the fact that the pedaler does not crossbreed capo but it well is not correct. sent18: if the pedaler crossbreeds capo it is not a kind of a corporal. sent19: the fact that the neurotransmitter does not stink alertness and/or it is onstage is wrong if the tab is not a Bergman. sent20: the sertraline is not a corporal. sent21: if the neurotransmitter wells then that the pedaler crossbreeds capo and is a wells is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if the neurotransmitter is not a well it does not stink alertness and/or is onstage.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neurotransmitter is not well.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the neurotransmitter does not stink alertness and/or it is onstage.; sent19 & sent16 -> int3: that the neurotransmitter does not stink alertness and/or is onstage is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the neurotransmitter is well.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: that the pedaler does not crossbreed capo and is a kind of a well is not true.; sent9 -> int7: the pedaler is not a corporal if the fact that it does not crossbreed capo and is a well does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__