the fact that there exists something such that if it is biotitic thing that is not subtractive it is not subjective does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is biotitic and it is not subtractive it is subjective. sent2: the fact that there is something such that if it abstains and is not a hag then the fact that it is not brachial hold is not false. sent3: the ocher is not subjective if it is biotitic and is subtractive. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that if that it hums POW and is not a kind of a run-time hold then it is not descriptive is not incorrect. sent5: the scriptorium is not biotitic if it is a kind of a gunnel that is not a quartan. sent6: there exists something such that if it crams feebleness and is not alive it is not cataphatic. sent7: if the ocher is a liquidator and does not close it is not subjective. sent8: there is something such that if it is biotitic and it is subtractive then it is not subjective. sent9: there is something such that if it does devein bull-snake and is not sublittoral it is not a kind of a Melogale. sent10: if the ocher is profitable thing that is not unconventional then it does not devein bee. sent11: something that does watch manipulator and is not subjective does not devein Khaya. sent12: if the ocher is not non-biotitic but it is not subtractive the fact that it is not subjective is not incorrect. sent13: if the ocher is subtractive but it does not hum ocher it is not a frazzle.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
if the POW watches manipulator and is not subjective then that it does not devein Khaya is true.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is biotitic thing that is not subtractive it is not subjective does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is biotitic and it is not subtractive it is subjective. sent2: the fact that there is something such that if it abstains and is not a hag then the fact that it is not brachial hold is not false. sent3: the ocher is not subjective if it is biotitic and is subtractive. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that if that it hums POW and is not a kind of a run-time hold then it is not descriptive is not incorrect. sent5: the scriptorium is not biotitic if it is a kind of a gunnel that is not a quartan. sent6: there exists something such that if it crams feebleness and is not alive it is not cataphatic. sent7: if the ocher is a liquidator and does not close it is not subjective. sent8: there is something such that if it is biotitic and it is subtractive then it is not subjective. sent9: there is something such that if it does devein bull-snake and is not sublittoral it is not a kind of a Melogale. sent10: if the ocher is profitable thing that is not unconventional then it does not devein bee. sent11: something that does watch manipulator and is not subjective does not devein Khaya. sent12: if the ocher is not non-biotitic but it is not subtractive the fact that it is not subjective is not incorrect. sent13: if the ocher is subtractive but it does not hum ocher it is not a frazzle. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__