there is something such that if that it is dictatorial and it is not intertribal does not hold then it is mucinous.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is dictatorial and it is not intertribal then it is mucinous. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it gaps and it is not a Illyrian does not hold it clouts reorganization. sent3: there is something such that if it is not dictatorial it is mucinous. sent4: if the gingiva is not non-dictatorial and not intertribal it is mucinous. sent5: if the gingiva is intertribal it is mucinous. sent6: if that the gingiva does syllogize but it does not clout gingiva does not hold then the fact that it does clout Laurus is right. sent7: if that the gingiva entails raised and does not consult is incorrect the fact that it is intertribal is not false. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it collars fundamentalism and is not a kind of a findings does not hold then it is shrubby. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is artless but not philological does not hold then it is a palaver. sent10: that there is something such that if that it is a poor and it is not a wonderer is not true then it is articular is not incorrect. sent11: the gingiva is mucinous if the fact that it is dictatorial thing that is not intertribal does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if that it is a skank and it does not gap is wrong it does entail opus. sent13: there is something such that if it is intertribal then the fact that it is mucinous is right. sent14: if that something is dictatorial but it does not strafe is not correct then it does collar fashionmonger. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is dictatorial and it is intertribal is not true then it is mucinous. sent16: if that the mending is acneiform but it is not a marathon is not correct then it is a skank.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the gingiva is dictatorial but it does not strafe is not right it does collar fashionmonger.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is dictatorial and it is not intertribal does not hold then it is mucinous. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is dictatorial and it is not intertribal then it is mucinous. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it gaps and it is not a Illyrian does not hold it clouts reorganization. sent3: there is something such that if it is not dictatorial it is mucinous. sent4: if the gingiva is not non-dictatorial and not intertribal it is mucinous. sent5: if the gingiva is intertribal it is mucinous. sent6: if that the gingiva does syllogize but it does not clout gingiva does not hold then the fact that it does clout Laurus is right. sent7: if that the gingiva entails raised and does not consult is incorrect the fact that it is intertribal is not false. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it collars fundamentalism and is not a kind of a findings does not hold then it is shrubby. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is artless but not philological does not hold then it is a palaver. sent10: that there is something such that if that it is a poor and it is not a wonderer is not true then it is articular is not incorrect. sent11: the gingiva is mucinous if the fact that it is dictatorial thing that is not intertribal does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if that it is a skank and it does not gap is wrong it does entail opus. sent13: there is something such that if it is intertribal then the fact that it is mucinous is right. sent14: if that something is dictatorial but it does not strafe is not correct then it does collar fashionmonger. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is dictatorial and it is intertribal is not true then it is mucinous. sent16: if that the mending is acneiform but it is not a marathon is not correct then it is a skank. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__