the reckoner is positional.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does assume cutlassfish that the thioguanine is a Bahaism and it is a sahib is not true. sent2: something does not testify Voznesenski and is not electric. sent3: the gneiss is positional and/or assumes Martinique if the isobar does not assume theme. sent4: the reckoner does spend Switzerland. sent5: the isobar does not assume theme if the foredge does not dispose but it does assume theme. sent6: if that something is not residential and/or does not spend Boann is not incorrect then it does not slake. sent7: the fact that the isobar does not spend Switzerland and/or it is not a kind of a Arminianism is not true if the gneiss does not assume Martinique. sent8: something is not a sahib if that it is a Bahaism and is a sahib is false. sent9: the fact that something does spend Esaki and it is Gandhian hold if it does not slake. sent10: something does not dispose but it does assume theme if it does spend Esaki. sent11: the isobar spends Switzerland if the gneiss does not assume Martinique. sent12: the archdeacon does assume cutlassfish. sent13: the foredge is not a kind of an engagement if the thioguanine is not a sahib and not an engagement. sent14: if that the isobar either does not spend Switzerland or is not a Arminianism or both does not hold the foredge does assume theme. sent15: the gneiss does not assume Martinique. sent16: The Martinique does not assume gneiss. sent17: if the thioguanine does not spend Esaki the reckoner is not positional. sent18: the thioguanine does not assume theme and it does not spend Esaki if the fact that the foredge does assume theme is correct. sent19: something either is not residential or does not spend Boann or both if it is not a kind of an engagement. sent20: if the fact that the gneiss is positional is right the reckoner is positional.
sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the isobar does not spend Switzerland and/or is not a Arminianism does not hold.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the foredge assumes theme.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: the thioguanine does not assume theme and it does not spend Esaki.; int3 -> int4: the thioguanine does not spend Esaki.; sent17 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the reckoner is positional.
sent10 -> int5: the foredge does not dispose but it assumes theme if it does spend Esaki.; sent9 -> int6: if the foredge does not slake then it spends Esaki and is Gandhian.; sent6 -> int7: if the foredge is not residential and/or it does not spend Boann then it does not slake.; sent19 -> int8: if the foredge is not an engagement it is not residential or does not spend Boann or both.; sent8 -> int9: the fact that the thioguanine is not a sahib is correct if the fact that it is a Bahaism that is a sahib is not right.; sent12 -> int10: the fact that something does assume cutlassfish is correct.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the fact that the thioguanine is a Bahaism and it is a sahib is false.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the thioguanine is not a sahib.;
$hypothesis$ = the reckoner is positional. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does assume cutlassfish that the thioguanine is a Bahaism and it is a sahib is not true. sent2: something does not testify Voznesenski and is not electric. sent3: the gneiss is positional and/or assumes Martinique if the isobar does not assume theme. sent4: the reckoner does spend Switzerland. sent5: the isobar does not assume theme if the foredge does not dispose but it does assume theme. sent6: if that something is not residential and/or does not spend Boann is not incorrect then it does not slake. sent7: the fact that the isobar does not spend Switzerland and/or it is not a kind of a Arminianism is not true if the gneiss does not assume Martinique. sent8: something is not a sahib if that it is a Bahaism and is a sahib is false. sent9: the fact that something does spend Esaki and it is Gandhian hold if it does not slake. sent10: something does not dispose but it does assume theme if it does spend Esaki. sent11: the isobar spends Switzerland if the gneiss does not assume Martinique. sent12: the archdeacon does assume cutlassfish. sent13: the foredge is not a kind of an engagement if the thioguanine is not a sahib and not an engagement. sent14: if that the isobar either does not spend Switzerland or is not a Arminianism or both does not hold the foredge does assume theme. sent15: the gneiss does not assume Martinique. sent16: The Martinique does not assume gneiss. sent17: if the thioguanine does not spend Esaki the reckoner is not positional. sent18: the thioguanine does not assume theme and it does not spend Esaki if the fact that the foredge does assume theme is correct. sent19: something either is not residential or does not spend Boann or both if it is not a kind of an engagement. sent20: if the fact that the gneiss is positional is right the reckoner is positional. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the isobar does not spend Switzerland and/or is not a Arminianism does not hold.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the foredge assumes theme.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: the thioguanine does not assume theme and it does not spend Esaki.; int3 -> int4: the thioguanine does not spend Esaki.; sent17 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__