the hostility happens.
sent1: if the waterloo does not occur then the fact that the proprioceptiveness does not occur and/or the evolving occurs is not correct. sent2: if that the fact that the swamping Nazification does not occur and the banning happens does not hold is not false the vaulting does not occur. sent3: the sampling overburden does not occur and the accountancy does not occur if the unsarcasticness happens. sent4: if the tonsillectomy happens then the hostility happens. sent5: the non-proprioceptiveness and/or the evolving occurs if the vaulting does not occur. sent6: the accountancy does not occur. sent7: if not the sampling overburden but the accountancy occurs then the waterloo does not occur. sent8: if that the field-cropness does not occur and the unscalableness happens is incorrect the tonsillectomy happens. sent9: that the sampling overburden does not occur and the accountancy does not occur prevents that the waterloo occurs. sent10: the fact that the swamping Nazification does not occur and the banning happens is false if the fact that the field-cropness does not occur is not false. sent11: the disreputableness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the field-cropness but the unscalableness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the field-cropness does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that not the swamping Nazification but the ban happens is incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the vault does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: either the non-proprioceptiveness or the evolving or both occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the hostility happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the waterloo does not occur then the fact that the proprioceptiveness does not occur and/or the evolving occurs is not correct. sent2: if that the fact that the swamping Nazification does not occur and the banning happens does not hold is not false the vaulting does not occur. sent3: the sampling overburden does not occur and the accountancy does not occur if the unsarcasticness happens. sent4: if the tonsillectomy happens then the hostility happens. sent5: the non-proprioceptiveness and/or the evolving occurs if the vaulting does not occur. sent6: the accountancy does not occur. sent7: if not the sampling overburden but the accountancy occurs then the waterloo does not occur. sent8: if that the field-cropness does not occur and the unscalableness happens is incorrect the tonsillectomy happens. sent9: that the sampling overburden does not occur and the accountancy does not occur prevents that the waterloo occurs. sent10: the fact that the swamping Nazification does not occur and the banning happens is false if the fact that the field-cropness does not occur is not false. sent11: the disreputableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the field-cropness but the unscalableness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the field-cropness does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that not the swamping Nazification but the ban happens is incorrect.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the vault does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: either the non-proprioceptiveness or the evolving or both occurs.; __UNKNOWN__