the fact that if the nuzzling does not occur then the tooling Visigoth but not the polemic happens is not correct.
sent1: the intrasententialness does not occur. sent2: that the nuzzling happens results in that the tooling Visigoth occurs but the polemic does not occur. sent3: the snuffling salad does not occur. sent4: the harmoniousness does not occur and the heaves happens. sent5: if that the snuffling salad does not occur hold the polemic does not occur but the chyliferousness happens. sent6: the fact that the hairlessness does not occur and the snuffling salad does not occur does not hold if the veneering does not occur. sent7: the photomechanicalness happens if the nuzzling does not occur. sent8: the tooling readout does not occur. sent9: if the pentangularness does not occur the tooling gripe happens and the tractiveness does not occur. sent10: the chyliferousness does not occur if the fact that the hairlessness does not occur and the snuffling salad does not occur is not right. sent11: if the nuzzling happens then the photomechanicalness happens. sent12: if the snuffling salad does not occur then the chyliferousness occurs. sent13: if the chyliferousness does not occur the tooling Visigoth and the polemic occurs. sent14: if the photomechanicalness happens then the tooling Visigoth happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nuzzling does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the photomechanicalness happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the tooling Visigoth happens.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the polemic does not occur and the chyliferousness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the polemic does not occur is correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the tooling Visigoth but not the polemic occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the allomorphicness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the nuzzling does not occur then the tooling Visigoth but not the polemic happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the intrasententialness does not occur. sent2: that the nuzzling happens results in that the tooling Visigoth occurs but the polemic does not occur. sent3: the snuffling salad does not occur. sent4: the harmoniousness does not occur and the heaves happens. sent5: if that the snuffling salad does not occur hold the polemic does not occur but the chyliferousness happens. sent6: the fact that the hairlessness does not occur and the snuffling salad does not occur does not hold if the veneering does not occur. sent7: the photomechanicalness happens if the nuzzling does not occur. sent8: the tooling readout does not occur. sent9: if the pentangularness does not occur the tooling gripe happens and the tractiveness does not occur. sent10: the chyliferousness does not occur if the fact that the hairlessness does not occur and the snuffling salad does not occur is not right. sent11: if the nuzzling happens then the photomechanicalness happens. sent12: if the snuffling salad does not occur then the chyliferousness occurs. sent13: if the chyliferousness does not occur the tooling Visigoth and the polemic occurs. sent14: if the photomechanicalness happens then the tooling Visigoth happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nuzzling does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the photomechanicalness happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the tooling Visigoth happens.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the polemic does not occur and the chyliferousness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the polemic does not occur is correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the tooling Visigoth but not the polemic occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__