the watchtower is not a kind of an ogre.
sent1: if something that does ratchet GB is aciculate then it is non-Dalmatian. sent2: the Angora is unhelpful. sent3: something is not aciculate if that it is operational and is an ogre hold. sent4: the fact that the Angora is not an ogre hold. sent5: the watchtower is unhelpful. sent6: if the fact that the Angora is aciculate is true then that it does not ratchet GB and it is a Dalmatian does not hold. sent7: the dominatrix is operational. sent8: the watchtower ratchets GB and is operational. sent9: if the Angora is unhelpful then the fact that it is not aciculate and it is not a Dalmatian is incorrect. sent10: the Angora is polymorphic and it is a kind of a template. sent11: the fact that the watchtower is both not an ogre and Dalmatian is not correct. sent12: the compositor does ratchet GB. sent13: the fact that the Angora is not a kind of an ogre and does ratchet GB is not true if that it is aciculate hold. sent14: if the Angora is a Dalmatian then the fact that the watchtower is aciculate is not incorrect. sent15: the watchtower is not a stableman. sent16: the Angora is not operational. sent17: if that the Angora is not aciculate and not a Dalmatian does not hold the watchtower is not aciculate. sent18: that the Angora is non-aciculate thing that is a kind of a Dalmatian is not true.
sent8 -> int1: the watchtower is operational.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the watchtower is a kind of an ogre.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the watchtower is both operational and an ogre.; sent3 -> int3: the fact that if the watchtower is a kind of operational thing that is the ogre then the fact that the watchtower is not aciculate is right is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the watchtower is not aciculate.; sent9 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the Angora is not aciculate and it is not a Dalmatian is not correct.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the watchtower is aciculate.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the watchtower is not a kind of an ogre. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does ratchet GB is aciculate then it is non-Dalmatian. sent2: the Angora is unhelpful. sent3: something is not aciculate if that it is operational and is an ogre hold. sent4: the fact that the Angora is not an ogre hold. sent5: the watchtower is unhelpful. sent6: if the fact that the Angora is aciculate is true then that it does not ratchet GB and it is a Dalmatian does not hold. sent7: the dominatrix is operational. sent8: the watchtower ratchets GB and is operational. sent9: if the Angora is unhelpful then the fact that it is not aciculate and it is not a Dalmatian is incorrect. sent10: the Angora is polymorphic and it is a kind of a template. sent11: the fact that the watchtower is both not an ogre and Dalmatian is not correct. sent12: the compositor does ratchet GB. sent13: the fact that the Angora is not a kind of an ogre and does ratchet GB is not true if that it is aciculate hold. sent14: if the Angora is a Dalmatian then the fact that the watchtower is aciculate is not incorrect. sent15: the watchtower is not a stableman. sent16: the Angora is not operational. sent17: if that the Angora is not aciculate and not a Dalmatian does not hold the watchtower is not aciculate. sent18: that the Angora is non-aciculate thing that is a kind of a Dalmatian is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the watchtower is operational.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the watchtower is a kind of an ogre.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the watchtower is both operational and an ogre.; sent3 -> int3: the fact that if the watchtower is a kind of operational thing that is the ogre then the fact that the watchtower is not aciculate is right is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the watchtower is not aciculate.; sent9 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the Angora is not aciculate and it is not a Dalmatian is not correct.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the watchtower is aciculate.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__