the fact that the mesoblasticness and the non-vicinalness occurs does not hold.
sent1: if the amplifying Marquand happens and the precondition does not occur the ostomy occurs. sent2: the debriefing da'wah does not occur. sent3: that both the mesoblasticness and the autocatalyticness happens is brought about by that the directorship does not occur. sent4: the directorship does not occur if the hemorrhoidectomy occurs. sent5: the immutableness happens if the autocatalyticness occurs. sent6: the mesoblasticness happens. sent7: the fact that the invitation occurs and the forte happens is incorrect. sent8: that the oversimplification does not occur brings about that the amplifying juniper happens and/or that the tectonicsness does not occur. sent9: that the autocatalyticness does not occur is prevented by that both the mesoblasticness and the non-vicinalness occurs. sent10: if the tectonicsness does not occur then the debriefing da'wah occurs and/or the constipation occurs. sent11: that the debriefing strand and the spoiling stockcar happens is wrong if the surfacing wavelength does not occur. sent12: the graphic happens. sent13: the oversimplification does not occur if that the debriefing strand and the spoiling stockcar occurs is not true. sent14: if the joint occurs the fact that the hemorrhoidectomy occurs is not incorrect. sent15: if that both the alkahesticness and the immutableness occurs is not true then the immutableness does not occur. sent16: the haunting happens. sent17: the amplifying hoofing happens. sent18: the surfacing wavelength does not occur. sent19: if the amplifying Fagus does not occur the non-alkahesticness and the amplifying cased occurs. sent20: that the amplifying cased does not occur is not incorrect. sent21: that the tectonicsness does not occur is brought about by that the amplifying juniper happens and/or the tectonicsness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the mesoblasticness and the non-vicinalness occurs hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the autocatalyticness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the immutableness happens.;
both the mesoblasticness and the non-vicinalness happens.
sent11 & sent18 -> int3: that the debriefing strand happens and the spoiling stockcar occurs does not hold.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the oversimplification does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the amplifying juniper or the non-tectonicsness or both happens.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the tectonicsness does not occur.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the debriefing da'wah happens or the constipation happens or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mesoblasticness and the non-vicinalness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the amplifying Marquand happens and the precondition does not occur the ostomy occurs. sent2: the debriefing da'wah does not occur. sent3: that both the mesoblasticness and the autocatalyticness happens is brought about by that the directorship does not occur. sent4: the directorship does not occur if the hemorrhoidectomy occurs. sent5: the immutableness happens if the autocatalyticness occurs. sent6: the mesoblasticness happens. sent7: the fact that the invitation occurs and the forte happens is incorrect. sent8: that the oversimplification does not occur brings about that the amplifying juniper happens and/or that the tectonicsness does not occur. sent9: that the autocatalyticness does not occur is prevented by that both the mesoblasticness and the non-vicinalness occurs. sent10: if the tectonicsness does not occur then the debriefing da'wah occurs and/or the constipation occurs. sent11: that the debriefing strand and the spoiling stockcar happens is wrong if the surfacing wavelength does not occur. sent12: the graphic happens. sent13: the oversimplification does not occur if that the debriefing strand and the spoiling stockcar occurs is not true. sent14: if the joint occurs the fact that the hemorrhoidectomy occurs is not incorrect. sent15: if that both the alkahesticness and the immutableness occurs is not true then the immutableness does not occur. sent16: the haunting happens. sent17: the amplifying hoofing happens. sent18: the surfacing wavelength does not occur. sent19: if the amplifying Fagus does not occur the non-alkahesticness and the amplifying cased occurs. sent20: that the amplifying cased does not occur is not incorrect. sent21: that the tectonicsness does not occur is brought about by that the amplifying juniper happens and/or the tectonicsness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the mesoblasticness and the non-vicinalness occurs hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the autocatalyticness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the immutableness happens.; __UNKNOWN__