the fact that the sericulture is not a uniform hold.
sent1: if the sericulture is not an appendage and not a quest then it is not a geotropism. sent2: the sericulture is achondritic if there is something such that it is not leaky and does not photostat. sent3: the kipper is an equator. sent4: if the sericulture is not a kind of a geotropism it is a clocksmith. sent5: a achondritic and uniform thing does not avoid. sent6: the Pullman is syntagmatic if there is something such that that it is both syntagmatic and not a lysine does not hold. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is not syntagmatic and is not a lysine does not hold. sent8: the fact that the Kern is a quest but it does not reverberate is incorrect if it is not allergic. sent9: if something is not a kind of a geotropism then it is a clocksmith. sent10: if the umbilical is not a kind of a clocksmith but it is a NYSE it is not a jollity. sent11: the sericulture is not a kind of an appendage and it is not a quest. sent12: something is a clocksmith and it does avoid if the fact that it is not a geotropism is right. sent13: if the fact that the Kern is not a kind of an appendage hold the peregrine is a geotropism and is a clocksmith. sent14: the fact that the Kern is not a quest hold if that it is a quest that does not reverberate is wrong. sent15: the Pullman does comfort peregrine and is not allergic if it is syntagmatic. sent16: a geotropism that is a clocksmith does not avoid. sent17: the kipper is not achondritic if there exists something such that it does not avoid. sent18: that if something is not a quest it is not a kind of an appendage is right. sent19: the Kern is not allergic if the Pullman does comfort peregrine but it is not allergic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sericulture does uniform.; sent5 -> int1: if the sericulture is achondritic and it is a uniform it does not avoid.; sent12 -> int2: if the sericulture is not a geotropism it is a clocksmith and it does avoid.; sent1 & sent11 -> int3: the sericulture is not a geotropism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sericulture is a clocksmith and it does avoid.; int4 -> int5: the sericulture does avoid.;
the fact that the sericulture is a kind of a uniform hold.
sent16 -> int6: the peregrine does not avoid if it is a geotropism and it is a clocksmith.; sent18 -> int7: the Kern is not a kind of an appendage if it does not quest.; sent7 & sent6 -> int8: the Pullman is syntagmatic.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the Pullman does comfort peregrine and is not allergic.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the Kern is not allergic.; sent8 & int10 -> int11: that the Kern does quest and does not reverberate is not correct.; sent14 & int11 -> int12: the Kern is not a kind of a quest.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the Kern is not a kind of an appendage.; sent13 & int13 -> int14: the peregrine is a geotropism and it is a clocksmith.; int6 & int14 -> int15: the peregrine does not avoid.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it does not avoid.; int16 & sent17 -> int17: the kipper is non-achondritic.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it is not achondritic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sericulture is not a uniform hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sericulture is not an appendage and not a quest then it is not a geotropism. sent2: the sericulture is achondritic if there is something such that it is not leaky and does not photostat. sent3: the kipper is an equator. sent4: if the sericulture is not a kind of a geotropism it is a clocksmith. sent5: a achondritic and uniform thing does not avoid. sent6: the Pullman is syntagmatic if there is something such that that it is both syntagmatic and not a lysine does not hold. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is not syntagmatic and is not a lysine does not hold. sent8: the fact that the Kern is a quest but it does not reverberate is incorrect if it is not allergic. sent9: if something is not a kind of a geotropism then it is a clocksmith. sent10: if the umbilical is not a kind of a clocksmith but it is a NYSE it is not a jollity. sent11: the sericulture is not a kind of an appendage and it is not a quest. sent12: something is a clocksmith and it does avoid if the fact that it is not a geotropism is right. sent13: if the fact that the Kern is not a kind of an appendage hold the peregrine is a geotropism and is a clocksmith. sent14: the fact that the Kern is not a quest hold if that it is a quest that does not reverberate is wrong. sent15: the Pullman does comfort peregrine and is not allergic if it is syntagmatic. sent16: a geotropism that is a clocksmith does not avoid. sent17: the kipper is not achondritic if there exists something such that it does not avoid. sent18: that if something is not a quest it is not a kind of an appendage is right. sent19: the Kern is not allergic if the Pullman does comfort peregrine but it is not allergic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sericulture does uniform.; sent5 -> int1: if the sericulture is achondritic and it is a uniform it does not avoid.; sent12 -> int2: if the sericulture is not a geotropism it is a clocksmith and it does avoid.; sent1 & sent11 -> int3: the sericulture is not a geotropism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sericulture is a clocksmith and it does avoid.; int4 -> int5: the sericulture does avoid.; __UNKNOWN__