that that both the Job and the swamping presidency occurs is not correct if the elimination does not occur is false.
sent1: that the unshrinkableness happens and the klondike occurs does not hold if the defiantness does not occur. sent2: if the stoicness occurs then the tonsillectomy does not occur. sent3: the stoppering happens. sent4: the fact that if the exalting interestedness does not occur that the exalting wire and the enslavement happens is not correct is not false. sent5: if the typographicness does not occur the biocatalyticness occurs and the consecration happens. sent6: the dressage does not occur. sent7: that the perceiving epiphora happens and the makeup happens does not hold if the joggle occurs. sent8: the fact that both the misting and the dressage occurs is not correct. sent9: that the swamping conifer does not occur is prevented by that the exalting rivulet happens. sent10: both the estrousness and the exalting interestedness occurs if the force-out does not occur. sent11: that the Job and the swamping presidency occurs is caused by that the elimination does not occur. sent12: that the exalting wire and the dip occurs does not hold. sent13: the fact that the Job and the swamping presidency occurs is not true if that the swamping quadrivium does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the downtownness but not the lockage occurs does not hold. sent15: the elimination is caused by the sampling channelization. sent16: the fact that the fact that both the swamping conifer and the tonsillectomy happens is not true is true. sent17: that the sampling channelization does not occur is prevented by that the misting happens. sent18: the dressage prevents the swamping quadrivium. sent19: the Job happens and the swamping presidency happens. sent20: if that the misting but not the dressage occurs is incorrect the swamping quadrivium does not occur. sent21: the fact that the inanimateness does not occur is right. sent22: the fact that the inferiorness occurs hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the mist but not the dressage happens hold.; assump2 -> int1: the mist occurs.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the sampling channelization occurs.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the elimination happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the elimination does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the misting happens but the dressage does not occur is not right.; sent20 & int5 -> int6: the swamping quadrivium does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: that that the Job occurs and the swamping presidency occurs is not right hold.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that both the Job and the swamping presidency occurs is not correct if the elimination does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the unshrinkableness happens and the klondike occurs does not hold if the defiantness does not occur. sent2: if the stoicness occurs then the tonsillectomy does not occur. sent3: the stoppering happens. sent4: the fact that if the exalting interestedness does not occur that the exalting wire and the enslavement happens is not correct is not false. sent5: if the typographicness does not occur the biocatalyticness occurs and the consecration happens. sent6: the dressage does not occur. sent7: that the perceiving epiphora happens and the makeup happens does not hold if the joggle occurs. sent8: the fact that both the misting and the dressage occurs is not correct. sent9: that the swamping conifer does not occur is prevented by that the exalting rivulet happens. sent10: both the estrousness and the exalting interestedness occurs if the force-out does not occur. sent11: that the Job and the swamping presidency occurs is caused by that the elimination does not occur. sent12: that the exalting wire and the dip occurs does not hold. sent13: the fact that the Job and the swamping presidency occurs is not true if that the swamping quadrivium does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the downtownness but not the lockage occurs does not hold. sent15: the elimination is caused by the sampling channelization. sent16: the fact that the fact that both the swamping conifer and the tonsillectomy happens is not true is true. sent17: that the sampling channelization does not occur is prevented by that the misting happens. sent18: the dressage prevents the swamping quadrivium. sent19: the Job happens and the swamping presidency happens. sent20: if that the misting but not the dressage occurs is incorrect the swamping quadrivium does not occur. sent21: the fact that the inanimateness does not occur is right. sent22: the fact that the inferiorness occurs hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the mist but not the dressage happens hold.; assump2 -> int1: the mist occurs.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the sampling channelization occurs.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the elimination happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the elimination does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the misting happens but the dressage does not occur is not right.; sent20 & int5 -> int6: the swamping quadrivium does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: that that the Job occurs and the swamping presidency occurs is not right hold.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__