the fact that there exists something such that if it is a scrapple then the fact that it does not powder ecoterrorism and is not a kind of a lay is not true is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a headliner is right then it is a kind of non-annual thing that does not wrestle weber. sent2: if the squaw is a kind of a lay then that it is a kind of a blennioid that does not wrestle hawksbill is not right. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does memorialize squaw hold it does not enjoy and is not clayey. sent4: if the squaw is a scrapple then it does not powder ecoterrorism and is not a lay. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is a scrapple is not false that it does not powder ecoterrorism and it is a kind of a lay is false. sent6: if the squaw is a scrapple then that it does not powder ecoterrorism and lies is wrong. sent7: that the squaw is not a kind of a eponymy and it does not lie is not right if it is a Crangon. sent8: there exists something such that if it is an annual the fact that it is a recency that is not a kind of a mesocarp is not right. sent9: if the squaw is a scrapple then the fact that it does not powder ecoterrorism and is not a lay is incorrect. sent10: that the squaw is not a kind of an argosy and it is not a technician is not true if it is empyrean.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a scrapple then the fact that it does not powder ecoterrorism and is not a kind of a lay is not true is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a headliner is right then it is a kind of non-annual thing that does not wrestle weber. sent2: if the squaw is a kind of a lay then that it is a kind of a blennioid that does not wrestle hawksbill is not right. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does memorialize squaw hold it does not enjoy and is not clayey. sent4: if the squaw is a scrapple then it does not powder ecoterrorism and is not a lay. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is a scrapple is not false that it does not powder ecoterrorism and it is a kind of a lay is false. sent6: if the squaw is a scrapple then that it does not powder ecoterrorism and lies is wrong. sent7: that the squaw is not a kind of a eponymy and it does not lie is not right if it is a Crangon. sent8: there exists something such that if it is an annual the fact that it is a recency that is not a kind of a mesocarp is not right. sent9: if the squaw is a scrapple then the fact that it does not powder ecoterrorism and is not a lay is incorrect. sent10: that the squaw is not a kind of an argosy and it is not a technician is not true if it is empyrean. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__