the proprietress shafts CJD.
sent1: something is not a Gorgon and/or is a kind of a blazer if it perpetuates stop. sent2: the proprietress is not incomprehensible. sent3: if the fact that something is a crick but it is not a Djiboutian is incorrect then it perpetuates Lablab. sent4: if the diesel-electric is non-incomprehensible a flogger then the proprietress shafts CJD. sent5: the fact that something cricks but it is not a Djiboutian is wrong if it whizzes. sent6: the diesel-electric perpetuates stop and it is a PX if it is not adsorbable. sent7: the fact that the proprietress is a kind of a flogger is not incorrect if the diesel-electric is comprehensible thing that shafts CJD. sent8: the proprietress is not a drupe. sent9: if the diesel-electric is not a kind of a Gorgon and/or is a blazer then the proprietress whizzes. sent10: something does not shaft CJD if it perpetuates Lablab. sent11: the peeler does shaft CJD. sent12: the diesel-electric is a kind of explicable thing that is a flogger. sent13: if the proprietress shafts CJD and is a flogger then that the diesel-electric is incomprehensible is correct.
sent4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the proprietress does not shaft CJD.
sent10 -> int1: if that the proprietress perpetuates Lablab is not incorrect it does not shaft CJD.; sent3 -> int2: the proprietress does perpetuate Lablab if the fact that it is a crick and it is not Djiboutian does not hold.; sent5 -> int3: if the proprietress does whizz then that it is a crick and not a Djiboutian is wrong.; sent1 -> int4: if the diesel-electric does perpetuate stop then it is not a Gorgon and/or is a blazer.;
$hypothesis$ = the proprietress shafts CJD. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a Gorgon and/or is a kind of a blazer if it perpetuates stop. sent2: the proprietress is not incomprehensible. sent3: if the fact that something is a crick but it is not a Djiboutian is incorrect then it perpetuates Lablab. sent4: if the diesel-electric is non-incomprehensible a flogger then the proprietress shafts CJD. sent5: the fact that something cricks but it is not a Djiboutian is wrong if it whizzes. sent6: the diesel-electric perpetuates stop and it is a PX if it is not adsorbable. sent7: the fact that the proprietress is a kind of a flogger is not incorrect if the diesel-electric is comprehensible thing that shafts CJD. sent8: the proprietress is not a drupe. sent9: if the diesel-electric is not a kind of a Gorgon and/or is a blazer then the proprietress whizzes. sent10: something does not shaft CJD if it perpetuates Lablab. sent11: the peeler does shaft CJD. sent12: the diesel-electric is a kind of explicable thing that is a flogger. sent13: if the proprietress shafts CJD and is a flogger then that the diesel-electric is incomprehensible is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__