the fact that the amphetamine is a cooperative and does dote is incorrect.
sent1: the Tabernacle does brazen output and does plead. sent2: the amphetamine does dote. sent3: if the linac is not non-sensorimotor that it does slug Tabernacle and does not circularize is wrong. sent4: if the Tabernacle does not slug supplement the fact that the egghead does plead and does brazen output is incorrect. sent5: if something does not slug supplement then that the fact that it is a kind of a cooperative that slugs cloisonne is true does not hold. sent6: if there is something such that that it does slug femininity and it is not sensorimotor is not correct then the linac is sensorimotor. sent7: that the Tabernacle does not slug supplement is not false if something that is not a design is a spackle. sent8: if something that does not design is not a spackle the Tabernacle does not slug supplement. sent9: something pleads and it does brazen output. sent10: if there is something such that that it does plead and brazens output does not hold that the erythropoietin is not a maildrop is not right. sent11: if the amphetamine is both apneic and cooperative it does not brazen output. sent12: if the erythropoietin is a maildrop and it dotes then it is not a cooperative. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does slug femininity and is not sensorimotor is wrong. sent14: there is something such that it is not a design and it is not a spackle. sent15: the erythropoietin is a whispered. sent16: the erythropoietin is a kind of a maildrop if there exists something such that it does not plead. sent17: the fact that the erythropoietin is not apneic if the erythropoietin is a maildrop and it whispers hold. sent18: if there are non-apneic things then that the amphetamine is a cooperative and it dotes is not incorrect. sent19: if the amphetamine does not dote the erythropoietin is apneic and whispers. sent20: if there is something such that it is apneic and it whispers the egghead is not a kind of a maildrop. sent21: if the egghead is not a maildrop the fact that the Tabernacle brazens output but it does not plead is incorrect.
sent14 & sent8 -> int1: that the Tabernacle does not slug supplement is not incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the egghead does plead and it does brazen output is not true.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it does plead and brazens output does not hold.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the erythropoietin is a kind of a maildrop.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the erythropoietin is a maildrop and it whispers.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the erythropoietin is not apneic.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not apneic is true.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the ironwork is a cooperative and it slugs cloisonne is wrong.
sent5 -> int8: if the ironwork does not slug supplement that it is cooperative thing that slugs cloisonne is not correct.; sent13 & sent6 -> int9: the linac is not non-sensorimotor.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: that the linac slugs Tabernacle but it does not circularize is wrong.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it slugs Tabernacle and does not circularize does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the amphetamine is a cooperative and does dote is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tabernacle does brazen output and does plead. sent2: the amphetamine does dote. sent3: if the linac is not non-sensorimotor that it does slug Tabernacle and does not circularize is wrong. sent4: if the Tabernacle does not slug supplement the fact that the egghead does plead and does brazen output is incorrect. sent5: if something does not slug supplement then that the fact that it is a kind of a cooperative that slugs cloisonne is true does not hold. sent6: if there is something such that that it does slug femininity and it is not sensorimotor is not correct then the linac is sensorimotor. sent7: that the Tabernacle does not slug supplement is not false if something that is not a design is a spackle. sent8: if something that does not design is not a spackle the Tabernacle does not slug supplement. sent9: something pleads and it does brazen output. sent10: if there is something such that that it does plead and brazens output does not hold that the erythropoietin is not a maildrop is not right. sent11: if the amphetamine is both apneic and cooperative it does not brazen output. sent12: if the erythropoietin is a maildrop and it dotes then it is not a cooperative. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does slug femininity and is not sensorimotor is wrong. sent14: there is something such that it is not a design and it is not a spackle. sent15: the erythropoietin is a whispered. sent16: the erythropoietin is a kind of a maildrop if there exists something such that it does not plead. sent17: the fact that the erythropoietin is not apneic if the erythropoietin is a maildrop and it whispers hold. sent18: if there are non-apneic things then that the amphetamine is a cooperative and it dotes is not incorrect. sent19: if the amphetamine does not dote the erythropoietin is apneic and whispers. sent20: if there is something such that it is apneic and it whispers the egghead is not a kind of a maildrop. sent21: if the egghead is not a maildrop the fact that the Tabernacle brazens output but it does not plead is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent8 -> int1: that the Tabernacle does not slug supplement is not incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the egghead does plead and it does brazen output is not true.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it does plead and brazens output does not hold.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the erythropoietin is a kind of a maildrop.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the erythropoietin is a maildrop and it whispers.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the erythropoietin is not apneic.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not apneic is true.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__