the fact that the impoverishing occurs is not false.
sent1: the fact that the sponsorship happens but the one-and-one does not occur does not hold if the cautery does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the scalloping skiff does not occur is not right the cautery does not occur. sent3: both the defraying Paige and the cerebellarness happens. sent4: the fact that the postbiblicalness happens and the scalloping skiff does not occur does not hold. sent5: that the impoverishing does not occur is triggered by that the one-and-one occurs and the lasting occurs. sent6: both the sponsorship and the defraying plasminogen happens. sent7: the spying does not occur. sent8: if the postbiblicalness occurs the cautery does not occur. sent9: the postbiblicalness does not occur if the fact that either the camber or the scalloping skiff or both happens is not true. sent10: the identifying occurs and the compartmentalization occurs. sent11: the camber happens. sent12: the defraying kowtow happens and the elucidation occurs. sent13: both the defraying chick and the tempering barbershop occurs. sent14: the fact that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the scalloping skiff does not occur is not true. sent15: the defraying producer happens. sent16: if the defraying plasminogen does not occur the impoverishing happens and the sponsorship occurs. sent17: that the fact that the detour and the hospitableness happens is wrong is not wrong. sent18: the lastingness happens and the camber happens. sent19: the aromaticness does not occur if the fact that both the non-offness and the non-mercantileness happens does not hold. sent20: that the fact that the exporting but not the adverbial occurs is not right hold. sent21: the admitting occurs. sent22: the defraying plasminogen happens.
sent6 -> int1: the sponsorship happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the one-and-one does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the sponsorship happens but the one-and-one does not occur is right.; sent2 & sent14 -> int3: the cautery does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the sponsorship but not the one-and-one happens is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the one-and-one occurs.; sent18 -> int7: the lasting occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: both the one-and-one and the lasting occurs.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the impoverishing occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the impoverishing occurs is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the sponsorship happens but the one-and-one does not occur does not hold if the cautery does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the scalloping skiff does not occur is not right the cautery does not occur. sent3: both the defraying Paige and the cerebellarness happens. sent4: the fact that the postbiblicalness happens and the scalloping skiff does not occur does not hold. sent5: that the impoverishing does not occur is triggered by that the one-and-one occurs and the lasting occurs. sent6: both the sponsorship and the defraying plasminogen happens. sent7: the spying does not occur. sent8: if the postbiblicalness occurs the cautery does not occur. sent9: the postbiblicalness does not occur if the fact that either the camber or the scalloping skiff or both happens is not true. sent10: the identifying occurs and the compartmentalization occurs. sent11: the camber happens. sent12: the defraying kowtow happens and the elucidation occurs. sent13: both the defraying chick and the tempering barbershop occurs. sent14: the fact that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the scalloping skiff does not occur is not true. sent15: the defraying producer happens. sent16: if the defraying plasminogen does not occur the impoverishing happens and the sponsorship occurs. sent17: that the fact that the detour and the hospitableness happens is wrong is not wrong. sent18: the lastingness happens and the camber happens. sent19: the aromaticness does not occur if the fact that both the non-offness and the non-mercantileness happens does not hold. sent20: that the fact that the exporting but not the adverbial occurs is not right hold. sent21: the admitting occurs. sent22: the defraying plasminogen happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the sponsorship happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the one-and-one does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the sponsorship happens but the one-and-one does not occur is right.; sent2 & sent14 -> int3: the cautery does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the sponsorship but not the one-and-one happens is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the one-and-one occurs.; sent18 -> int7: the lasting occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: both the one-and-one and the lasting occurs.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__