the curmudgeon is not a kind of a argemone.
sent1: if something is a kind of a argemone then it is non-exterior thing that does not activate Kalotermitidae. sent2: the fact that that something is not a argemone but it does activate spoliation is not incorrect is not correct if it is a Petrarch. sent3: if the bargello is a vitiation then it is not emphysematous and not stingy. sent4: the curmudgeon does not impact mobocracy and it is not emphysematous if it is a Petrarch. sent5: something is not a kind of a argemone if that it does not impact mobocracy and is not emphysematous is correct. sent6: that the curmudgeon is a Petrarch is right.
sent5 -> int1: the curmudgeon is not a argemone if it does not impact mobocracy and it is not emphysematous.; sent4 & sent6 -> int2: the curmudgeon does not impact mobocracy and it is not emphysematous.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the upper is not exterior and does not activate Kalotermitidae if it is a argemone.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the curmudgeon is not a kind of a argemone. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a argemone then it is non-exterior thing that does not activate Kalotermitidae. sent2: the fact that that something is not a argemone but it does activate spoliation is not incorrect is not correct if it is a Petrarch. sent3: if the bargello is a vitiation then it is not emphysematous and not stingy. sent4: the curmudgeon does not impact mobocracy and it is not emphysematous if it is a Petrarch. sent5: something is not a kind of a argemone if that it does not impact mobocracy and is not emphysematous is correct. sent6: that the curmudgeon is a Petrarch is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the curmudgeon is not a argemone if it does not impact mobocracy and it is not emphysematous.; sent4 & sent6 -> int2: the curmudgeon does not impact mobocracy and it is not emphysematous.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__