that the fact that there is something such that if it is not insoluble it mass-produces grazier and is not a crouch is right does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it does not spray culmination it is wigless and it is not a holography. sent2: the judge mass-produces grazier and does not crouch if it is not insoluble. sent3: if the judge is not insoluble it does mass-produce grazier. sent4: the limeade does mass-produce grazier and it is a forty-niner if it is not a sinapism. sent5: something does communicate critic and is not a ninepins if it does not warm.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the critic does not warm then it communicates critic and is not a ninepins.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that there is something such that if it is not insoluble it mass-produces grazier and is not a crouch is right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not spray culmination it is wigless and it is not a holography. sent2: the judge mass-produces grazier and does not crouch if it is not insoluble. sent3: if the judge is not insoluble it does mass-produce grazier. sent4: the limeade does mass-produce grazier and it is a forty-niner if it is not a sinapism. sent5: something does communicate critic and is not a ninepins if it does not warm. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__