there is something such that if it is not accipitrine then the fact that it is migratory is not incorrect.
sent1: something does not slog bugginess and is not a logbook. sent2: if the fact that something is a predictability hold that it does not dabble and is accipitrine is not right. sent3: that the saver is not migratory is wrong if either it does not book yardgrass or it is a prothalamion or both. sent4: if the saver is not a predictability and/or does slog Grass it does rid vestiture. sent5: if the saver is accipitrine it is not nonmigratory. sent6: if something that does not slog bugginess is not a logbook the saver does rid Galway. sent7: if the vestiture veers then it is faecal. sent8: something does not rid Galway and it is not migratory. sent9: if something does not slog bugginess but it is a logbook the saver rids Galway. sent10: if the saver dabbles then it is a predictability and/or it slogs Grass. sent11: there is something such that if it is accipitrine then it is migratory. sent12: if the saver is accipitrine the concealment is not accipitrine. sent13: if the saver rids vestiture it is migratory. sent14: the saver is a apse. sent15: if the saver is not a predictability then that it rids vestiture is right. sent16: the saver is a kind of a predictability and/or slogs Grass. sent17: the saver does dabble if it rids Galway and it is not accipitrine. sent18: if the saver dabbles then it is not a predictability or it does slog Grass or both. sent19: if the fact that something does slog bugginess and is not a logbook hold the saver does rid Galway. sent20: if the saver does rid Galway and is accipitrine it dabbles.
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the saver does rid Galway.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saver is not accipitrine.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the saver does rid Galway but it is not accipitrine.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the saver does dabble hold.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: either the saver is not a predictability or it slogs Grass or both.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the saver does rid vestiture.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the saver is migratory.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the saver is migratory if that it is not accipitrine is not incorrect.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the concealment rids vestiture.
sent2 -> int8: if the pinstripe is a predictability the fact that it does not dabble and is accipitrine is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not accipitrine then the fact that it is migratory is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not slog bugginess and is not a logbook. sent2: if the fact that something is a predictability hold that it does not dabble and is accipitrine is not right. sent3: that the saver is not migratory is wrong if either it does not book yardgrass or it is a prothalamion or both. sent4: if the saver is not a predictability and/or does slog Grass it does rid vestiture. sent5: if the saver is accipitrine it is not nonmigratory. sent6: if something that does not slog bugginess is not a logbook the saver does rid Galway. sent7: if the vestiture veers then it is faecal. sent8: something does not rid Galway and it is not migratory. sent9: if something does not slog bugginess but it is a logbook the saver rids Galway. sent10: if the saver dabbles then it is a predictability and/or it slogs Grass. sent11: there is something such that if it is accipitrine then it is migratory. sent12: if the saver is accipitrine the concealment is not accipitrine. sent13: if the saver rids vestiture it is migratory. sent14: the saver is a apse. sent15: if the saver is not a predictability then that it rids vestiture is right. sent16: the saver is a kind of a predictability and/or slogs Grass. sent17: the saver does dabble if it rids Galway and it is not accipitrine. sent18: if the saver dabbles then it is not a predictability or it does slog Grass or both. sent19: if the fact that something does slog bugginess and is not a logbook hold the saver does rid Galway. sent20: if the saver does rid Galway and is accipitrine it dabbles. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the saver does rid Galway.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saver is not accipitrine.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the saver does rid Galway but it is not accipitrine.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the saver does dabble hold.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: either the saver is not a predictability or it slogs Grass or both.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the saver does rid vestiture.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the saver is migratory.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the saver is migratory if that it is not accipitrine is not incorrect.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__