that the brisantness occurs but the channelizing does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the clouding shtik happens. sent2: the fact that that the nontranslationalness does not occur is false is not wrong. sent3: if that the gastronomicness does not occur is not false then the injectableness does not occur. sent4: that the damper and the precedence happens is triggered by the non-injectableness. sent5: the damper happens. sent6: if the gravitation does not occur and the trinucleateness does not occur the murine happens. sent7: the trinucleateness does not occur. sent8: that the gastronomicness does not occur and the sampling meteorology does not occur is caused by that the conspiratorialness happens. sent9: if the gravitation occurs that the brisantness but not the channelizing happens is not right. sent10: if that not the cyprinid but the bloodiness happens is not correct then the bloodiness does not occur. sent11: the sampling elongation does not occur. sent12: both the brisantness and the damper occurs. sent13: the non-trinucleateness is prevented by that the non-murineness and the translationalness happens. sent14: the gravitation does not occur. sent15: the non-bloodyness triggers that the conspiratorialness occurs and the hamming occurs. sent16: the conspiratorialness does not occur. sent17: the generousness occurs. sent18: that not the cyprinid but the bloodying occurs is not true if the clattering happens. sent19: the batting does not occur. sent20: the non-nontranslationalness is caused by that the murineness happens and the channelizing occurs.
sent14 & sent7 -> int1: the gravitation does not occur and the trinucleateness does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the murine occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the channelizing occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the murine occurs and the channelizing occurs.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the nontranslationalness does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the channelizing does not occur.; sent12 -> int7: the brisantness occurs.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the brisantness but not the channelizing occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the brisantness occurs but the channelizing does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the clouding shtik happens. sent2: the fact that that the nontranslationalness does not occur is false is not wrong. sent3: if that the gastronomicness does not occur is not false then the injectableness does not occur. sent4: that the damper and the precedence happens is triggered by the non-injectableness. sent5: the damper happens. sent6: if the gravitation does not occur and the trinucleateness does not occur the murine happens. sent7: the trinucleateness does not occur. sent8: that the gastronomicness does not occur and the sampling meteorology does not occur is caused by that the conspiratorialness happens. sent9: if the gravitation occurs that the brisantness but not the channelizing happens is not right. sent10: if that not the cyprinid but the bloodiness happens is not correct then the bloodiness does not occur. sent11: the sampling elongation does not occur. sent12: both the brisantness and the damper occurs. sent13: the non-trinucleateness is prevented by that the non-murineness and the translationalness happens. sent14: the gravitation does not occur. sent15: the non-bloodyness triggers that the conspiratorialness occurs and the hamming occurs. sent16: the conspiratorialness does not occur. sent17: the generousness occurs. sent18: that not the cyprinid but the bloodying occurs is not true if the clattering happens. sent19: the batting does not occur. sent20: the non-nontranslationalness is caused by that the murineness happens and the channelizing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent7 -> int1: the gravitation does not occur and the trinucleateness does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the murine occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the channelizing occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the murine occurs and the channelizing occurs.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the nontranslationalness does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the channelizing does not occur.; sent12 -> int7: the brisantness occurs.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__