the fact that the persona happens if the DO happens is not right.
sent1: that the homeopathicness occurs is brought about by that the anopheline occurs and the sputtering motormouth happens. sent2: the fact that both the googling and the clanking Corinthian occurs is not right if the bartering does not occur. sent3: the DO does not occur if the barter occurs and the isopteranness happens. sent4: that the googling occurs and the clanking Corinthian happens is false. sent5: that the googling occurs but the clanking Corinthian does not occur is wrong if the bartering does not occur. sent6: the fact that the persona occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the clanking Corinthian happens is right. sent7: the DO happens if the bartering and the isopteranness occurs. sent8: if that the googling occurs and the clanking Corinthian does not occur is wrong the persona occurs. sent9: the isopteranness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the DO occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bartering happens.; assump2 & sent9 -> int1: the barter and the isopteranness occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the DO does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the bartering does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the googling happens but the clanking Corinthian does not occur is wrong is correct.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the persona happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the persona happens if the DO happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the homeopathicness occurs is brought about by that the anopheline occurs and the sputtering motormouth happens. sent2: the fact that both the googling and the clanking Corinthian occurs is not right if the bartering does not occur. sent3: the DO does not occur if the barter occurs and the isopteranness happens. sent4: that the googling occurs and the clanking Corinthian happens is false. sent5: that the googling occurs but the clanking Corinthian does not occur is wrong if the bartering does not occur. sent6: the fact that the persona occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the clanking Corinthian happens is right. sent7: the DO happens if the bartering and the isopteranness occurs. sent8: if that the googling occurs and the clanking Corinthian does not occur is wrong the persona occurs. sent9: the isopteranness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the DO occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bartering happens.; assump2 & sent9 -> int1: the barter and the isopteranness occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the DO does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the bartering does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the googling happens but the clanking Corinthian does not occur is wrong is correct.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the persona happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__