the fact that the eliminating method does not occur and the interrelating galena occurs is not correct.
sent1: the plop happens if the gossip does not occur but the thyrotoxicness occurs. sent2: the thyrotoxicness happens. sent3: if both the hydrometricness and the antemortemness happens the Slovenian does not occur. sent4: if that the eliminating method happens and the unmaking humbug happens is false the eliminating method does not occur. sent5: the hypsometry happens if either the caduceanness happens or the consociating does not occur or both. sent6: if the plop occurs then the interrelating galena occurs. sent7: the souther occurs. sent8: the defibrillating brainworker happens. sent9: the fact that the eliminating method occurs is not wrong if that the eliminating method does not occur but the unmaking humbug happens is not correct. sent10: if the fact that the hypsometry does not occur or the gossiping does not occur or both is not true then the crab happens. sent11: that the eliminating method happens and the unmaking humbug happens is not right. sent12: if that the defibrillating brainworker does not occur and the eliminating welt does not occur does not hold then the eliminating welt happens. sent13: if the defibrillating brainworker happens the hypsometry does not occur but the eliminating welt occurs. sent14: that the defibrillating brainworker does not occur and the eliminating welt does not occur is false if the Slovenian does not occur. sent15: if the gossip happens then the caduceanness occurs and/or the consociating does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gossiping happens.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the caduceanness happens or the consociating does not occur or both.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the hypsometry occurs.; sent13 & sent8 -> int3: the hypsometry does not occur and the eliminating welt happens.; int3 -> int4: the hypsometry does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the gossiping does not occur is correct.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: not the gossip but the thyrotoxicness happens.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the plop happens.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the interrelating galena happens.; sent4 & sent11 -> int10: that the eliminating method does not occur is true.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the crabbing occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the eliminating method does not occur and the interrelating galena occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the plop happens if the gossip does not occur but the thyrotoxicness occurs. sent2: the thyrotoxicness happens. sent3: if both the hydrometricness and the antemortemness happens the Slovenian does not occur. sent4: if that the eliminating method happens and the unmaking humbug happens is false the eliminating method does not occur. sent5: the hypsometry happens if either the caduceanness happens or the consociating does not occur or both. sent6: if the plop occurs then the interrelating galena occurs. sent7: the souther occurs. sent8: the defibrillating brainworker happens. sent9: the fact that the eliminating method occurs is not wrong if that the eliminating method does not occur but the unmaking humbug happens is not correct. sent10: if the fact that the hypsometry does not occur or the gossiping does not occur or both is not true then the crab happens. sent11: that the eliminating method happens and the unmaking humbug happens is not right. sent12: if that the defibrillating brainworker does not occur and the eliminating welt does not occur does not hold then the eliminating welt happens. sent13: if the defibrillating brainworker happens the hypsometry does not occur but the eliminating welt occurs. sent14: that the defibrillating brainworker does not occur and the eliminating welt does not occur is false if the Slovenian does not occur. sent15: if the gossip happens then the caduceanness occurs and/or the consociating does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gossiping happens.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the caduceanness happens or the consociating does not occur or both.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the hypsometry occurs.; sent13 & sent8 -> int3: the hypsometry does not occur and the eliminating welt happens.; int3 -> int4: the hypsometry does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the gossiping does not occur is correct.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: not the gossip but the thyrotoxicness happens.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the plop happens.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the interrelating galena happens.; sent4 & sent11 -> int10: that the eliminating method does not occur is true.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__