the nonharmonicness and the stabbing signer occurs.
sent1: both the luau and the residency happens if the appreciation does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the nonharmonicness and the stabbing signer happens is incorrect if the muzzling does not occur. sent3: the residency happens if the fact that the appreciation does not occur is not wrong. sent4: the gilding peptide happens. sent5: if the disintegrativeness and the moderation happens then the luau does not occur. sent6: the stabbing signer occurs and the gilding imperfective occurs. sent7: the fact that the appreciation does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: that the fact that the moderation occurs hold if the muzzle occurs hold. sent9: the muzzling happens. sent10: the partial occurs. sent11: the muzzle does not occur if the disintegrativeness does not occur and the moderation does not occur. sent12: that the brutalization does not occur is prevented by the accessibleness.
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the moderation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disintegrativeness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the disintegrativeness and the moderation occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the luau does not occur.; sent1 & sent7 -> int4: the luau occurs and the residency occurs.; int4 -> int5: the luau happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the disintegrativeness does not occur.; sent6 -> int8: that the stabbing signer happens hold.;
the fact that the nonharmonicness and the stabbing signer occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the nonharmonicness and the stabbing signer occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: both the luau and the residency happens if the appreciation does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the nonharmonicness and the stabbing signer happens is incorrect if the muzzling does not occur. sent3: the residency happens if the fact that the appreciation does not occur is not wrong. sent4: the gilding peptide happens. sent5: if the disintegrativeness and the moderation happens then the luau does not occur. sent6: the stabbing signer occurs and the gilding imperfective occurs. sent7: the fact that the appreciation does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: that the fact that the moderation occurs hold if the muzzle occurs hold. sent9: the muzzling happens. sent10: the partial occurs. sent11: the muzzle does not occur if the disintegrativeness does not occur and the moderation does not occur. sent12: that the brutalization does not occur is prevented by the accessibleness. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the moderation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disintegrativeness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the disintegrativeness and the moderation occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the luau does not occur.; sent1 & sent7 -> int4: the luau occurs and the residency occurs.; int4 -> int5: the luau happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the disintegrativeness does not occur.; sent6 -> int8: that the stabbing signer happens hold.; __UNKNOWN__