the hygrodeik is a sweatband and it adds continuant.
sent1: something is a Trachipteridae if the fact that it does not commentate and it is not a baba is false. sent2: everything is a kind of a Trachipteridae. sent3: something is a sweatband if the fact that it is not a sojourner and it is non-dactylic is incorrect. sent4: the challis is a squaretail and it is a kind of a Saba. sent5: if the hygrodeik is a sojourner it is a sweatband. sent6: the challis is not dactylic if the Chechen is not myotonic but it commentates. sent7: if that the Chechen is not myotonic but it commentates does not hold then it is not a Trachipteridae. sent8: the challis is a baba if it is a squaretail. sent9: the hygrodeik is a baba and adds continuant. sent10: that something is a sweatband and adds continuant does not hold if it is not dactylic. sent11: that that the hygrodeik is not a sojourner and is not dactylic is not true if the challis is not dactylic is right. sent12: the Chechen is a kind of a sweatband.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Chechen is not myotonic but it does commentate does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Chechen is not a kind of a Trachipteridae.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the Chechen is a Trachipteridae is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Chechen is not myotonic and does commentate.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the challis is not dactylic.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the hygrodeik is both not a sojourner and not dactylic is wrong.; sent3 -> int7: that if the fact that the hygrodeik is not the sojourner and it is not dactylic does not hold the hygrodeik is a sweatband hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the hygrodeik is a sweatband.; sent9 -> int9: the fact that the hygrodeik does add continuant is not incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the hygrodeik is a sweatband that adds continuant is not correct.
sent10 -> int10: that the hygrodeik is a sweatband and it adds continuant is not correct if it is non-dactylic.; sent4 -> int11: the challis is a squaretail.; sent8 & int11 -> int12: the challis is a baba.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is a kind of a baba.;
$hypothesis$ = the hygrodeik is a sweatband and it adds continuant. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Trachipteridae if the fact that it does not commentate and it is not a baba is false. sent2: everything is a kind of a Trachipteridae. sent3: something is a sweatband if the fact that it is not a sojourner and it is non-dactylic is incorrect. sent4: the challis is a squaretail and it is a kind of a Saba. sent5: if the hygrodeik is a sojourner it is a sweatband. sent6: the challis is not dactylic if the Chechen is not myotonic but it commentates. sent7: if that the Chechen is not myotonic but it commentates does not hold then it is not a Trachipteridae. sent8: the challis is a baba if it is a squaretail. sent9: the hygrodeik is a baba and adds continuant. sent10: that something is a sweatband and adds continuant does not hold if it is not dactylic. sent11: that that the hygrodeik is not a sojourner and is not dactylic is not true if the challis is not dactylic is right. sent12: the Chechen is a kind of a sweatband. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Chechen is not myotonic but it does commentate does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Chechen is not a kind of a Trachipteridae.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the Chechen is a Trachipteridae is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Chechen is not myotonic and does commentate.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the challis is not dactylic.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the hygrodeik is both not a sojourner and not dactylic is wrong.; sent3 -> int7: that if the fact that the hygrodeik is not the sojourner and it is not dactylic does not hold the hygrodeik is a sweatband hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the hygrodeik is a sweatband.; sent9 -> int9: the fact that the hygrodeik does add continuant is not incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__