the seasoner is a Durer.
sent1: something does not number de-escalation if it does not number rerun and is a kind of a faithful. sent2: something does not number rerun but it is faithful if it does not brachiate. sent3: if that the seasoner does not slink yaw and/or it does slink MP is not correct then the stover is not a kind of an argosy. sent4: if something either does not slink yaw or slinks MP or both then the fact that it does not brachiate is true. sent5: that the seasoner is a kind of a Durer is right if it is Uniate. sent6: the stover is an argosy. sent7: the fact that the seasoner is not a kind of a terbium is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the seasoner does not slink yaw and/or slinks MP does not hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the stover is not a kind of an argosy.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the seasoner does not slink yaw or it does slink MP or both.; sent4 -> int4: the seasoner does not brachiate if either it does not slink yaw or it slinks MP or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the seasoner does not brachiate is not wrong.; sent2 -> int6: the seasoner does not number rerun and is a kind of a faithful if it does not brachiate.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the seasoner does not number rerun but it is faithful.; sent1 -> int8: the seasoner does not number de-escalation if it does not number rerun and is a faithful.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the seasoner does not number de-escalation.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the seasoner does not number de-escalation but it is a terbium.;
$hypothesis$ = the seasoner is a Durer. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not number de-escalation if it does not number rerun and is a kind of a faithful. sent2: something does not number rerun but it is faithful if it does not brachiate. sent3: if that the seasoner does not slink yaw and/or it does slink MP is not correct then the stover is not a kind of an argosy. sent4: if something either does not slink yaw or slinks MP or both then the fact that it does not brachiate is true. sent5: that the seasoner is a kind of a Durer is right if it is Uniate. sent6: the stover is an argosy. sent7: the fact that the seasoner is not a kind of a terbium is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the seasoner does not slink yaw and/or slinks MP does not hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the stover is not a kind of an argosy.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the seasoner does not slink yaw or it does slink MP or both.; sent4 -> int4: the seasoner does not brachiate if either it does not slink yaw or it slinks MP or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the seasoner does not brachiate is not wrong.; sent2 -> int6: the seasoner does not number rerun and is a kind of a faithful if it does not brachiate.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the seasoner does not number rerun but it is faithful.; sent1 -> int8: the seasoner does not number de-escalation if it does not number rerun and is a faithful.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the seasoner does not number de-escalation.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the seasoner does not number de-escalation but it is a terbium.; __UNKNOWN__