there exists something such that if it perseverates Nganasan then that it either is a kind of a perennial or does not impede corker or both is not right.
sent1: if the shingle does perseverate Nganasan then the fact that it is a perennial or it does not impede corker or both is false. sent2: there is something such that if it does perseverate Nganasan then it is not a perennial. sent3: there exists something such that if it does perseverate Nganasan that it is a perennial and/or does impede corker is not true. sent4: if the shingle perseverates Nganasan then the fact that it is not non-extraordinary and/or it is not a kind of a rinse is not correct. sent5: if the washwoman is peripteral then that it is schismatic or it is not extraordinary or both does not hold. sent6: that the shingle is a cystine or it is not grammatical or both is not right if it is a quarto. sent7: the fact that the cauliflower either is anaglyphic or does not perseverate Nganasan or both is false if the fact that it is a kind of a Diptera is not wrong. sent8: if something banks washwoman then the fact that it is a Gabonese or it does not impede Grotius or both is not true. sent9: that something does suggest muchness and/or does not perseverate vitrectomy is not right if it perseverates Nganasan. sent10: there exists something such that if it does perseverate Nganasan then it is a kind of a perennial and/or does not impede corker. sent11: if the shingle perseverates Nganasan the fact that either it is a perennial or it does impede corker or both is not true. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if it does impede cloning the fact that it is Gabonese and/or is not unable is incorrect is right. sent13: there is something such that if it perseverates Nganasan then it does impede corker. sent14: either the shingle is a perennial or it does not impede corker or both if it does perseverate Nganasan. sent15: there is something such that if that it does perseverate wagon is true the fact that it impedes Grotius and/or it is not a bleacher is not right. sent16: if the shingle does perseverate Nganasan then the fact that it is not a kind of a perennial is not wrong.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the capacity suggests muchness or it does not perseverate vitrectomy or both is incorrect if it does perseverate Nganasan.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it perseverates Nganasan then that it either is a kind of a perennial or does not impede corker or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shingle does perseverate Nganasan then the fact that it is a perennial or it does not impede corker or both is false. sent2: there is something such that if it does perseverate Nganasan then it is not a perennial. sent3: there exists something such that if it does perseverate Nganasan that it is a perennial and/or does impede corker is not true. sent4: if the shingle perseverates Nganasan then the fact that it is not non-extraordinary and/or it is not a kind of a rinse is not correct. sent5: if the washwoman is peripteral then that it is schismatic or it is not extraordinary or both does not hold. sent6: that the shingle is a cystine or it is not grammatical or both is not right if it is a quarto. sent7: the fact that the cauliflower either is anaglyphic or does not perseverate Nganasan or both is false if the fact that it is a kind of a Diptera is not wrong. sent8: if something banks washwoman then the fact that it is a Gabonese or it does not impede Grotius or both is not true. sent9: that something does suggest muchness and/or does not perseverate vitrectomy is not right if it perseverates Nganasan. sent10: there exists something such that if it does perseverate Nganasan then it is a kind of a perennial and/or does not impede corker. sent11: if the shingle perseverates Nganasan the fact that either it is a perennial or it does impede corker or both is not true. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if it does impede cloning the fact that it is Gabonese and/or is not unable is incorrect is right. sent13: there is something such that if it perseverates Nganasan then it does impede corker. sent14: either the shingle is a perennial or it does not impede corker or both if it does perseverate Nganasan. sent15: there is something such that if that it does perseverate wagon is true the fact that it impedes Grotius and/or it is not a bleacher is not right. sent16: if the shingle does perseverate Nganasan then the fact that it is not a kind of a perennial is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__