if the exhibitionism tweets myrrh then that the lido is an invention is correct.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it puts magdalen and drags clews is not right. sent2: the fact that the fact that the exhibitionism tweets myrrh and does not put magdalen is not true is not false if the Hindu drags clews. sent3: if the Hindu tweets myrrh that the lido is an invention but it does not drag clews is wrong. sent4: the fact that the Hindu puts magdalen and does not drag clews does not hold if that the exhibitionism tweets myrrh is right. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does drag clews and does not put magdalen is incorrect that the Hindu tweets myrrh is true. sent6: if something drags clews the lido is a kind of an invention. sent7: if the fact that the exhibitionism does tweet myrrh is true that the Hindu does put magdalen and drags clews is incorrect. sent8: something does put magdalen but it does not drag clews. sent9: that the pest does drag decile but it is not musicological does not hold. sent10: the fact that the Hindu does put magdalen and is not an invention does not hold. sent11: the exhibitionism does put magdalen. sent12: there is something such that that it puts magdalen and does not tweet myrrh is wrong. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it puts magdalen and it does not drag clews is not right then the lido is an invention. sent14: the exhibitionism tweets myrrh if there is something such that that it does drag clews and is not an invention is not true. sent15: the fact that the Hindu does put magdalen and it does drag clews is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exhibitionism tweets myrrh.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the Hindu does put magdalen but it does not drag clews is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it puts magdalen and it does not drag clews is wrong.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the lido is a kind of an invention.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the exhibitionism tweets myrrh then that the lido is an invention is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it puts magdalen and drags clews is not right. sent2: the fact that the fact that the exhibitionism tweets myrrh and does not put magdalen is not true is not false if the Hindu drags clews. sent3: if the Hindu tweets myrrh that the lido is an invention but it does not drag clews is wrong. sent4: the fact that the Hindu puts magdalen and does not drag clews does not hold if that the exhibitionism tweets myrrh is right. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does drag clews and does not put magdalen is incorrect that the Hindu tweets myrrh is true. sent6: if something drags clews the lido is a kind of an invention. sent7: if the fact that the exhibitionism does tweet myrrh is true that the Hindu does put magdalen and drags clews is incorrect. sent8: something does put magdalen but it does not drag clews. sent9: that the pest does drag decile but it is not musicological does not hold. sent10: the fact that the Hindu does put magdalen and is not an invention does not hold. sent11: the exhibitionism does put magdalen. sent12: there is something such that that it puts magdalen and does not tweet myrrh is wrong. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it puts magdalen and it does not drag clews is not right then the lido is an invention. sent14: the exhibitionism tweets myrrh if there is something such that that it does drag clews and is not an invention is not true. sent15: the fact that the Hindu does put magdalen and it does drag clews is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exhibitionism tweets myrrh.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the Hindu does put magdalen but it does not drag clews is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it puts magdalen and it does not drag clews is wrong.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the lido is a kind of an invention.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__