the dacoity does not occur but the administrativeness occurs.
sent1: if the uncommunicativeness and the dacoity occurs the modality does not occur. sent2: that the luxuriating drudgery does not occur yields that the anaestheticness and the administrativeness occurs. sent3: the unavailableness does not occur and the bathing volcano does not occur. sent4: the luxuriating drudgery does not occur. sent5: if the bathing volcano does not occur then both the modality and the inquest occurs. sent6: the fact that the curve does not occur and/or the bathing stripped does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the uncommunicativeness occurs if the fact that either the curve does not occur or the bathing stripped does not occur or both is not true.
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the uncommunicativeness does not occur does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dacoity occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the uncommunicativeness occurs and the dacoity occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the modality does not occur.; sent3 -> int4: the bathing volcano does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: both the modality and the inquest happens.; int5 -> int6: the modality occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the dacoity does not occur.; sent2 & sent4 -> int9: both the anaestheticness and the administrativeness occurs.; int9 -> int10: that the administrativeness happens is true.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the dacoity does not occur but the administrativeness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the uncommunicativeness and the dacoity occurs the modality does not occur. sent2: that the luxuriating drudgery does not occur yields that the anaestheticness and the administrativeness occurs. sent3: the unavailableness does not occur and the bathing volcano does not occur. sent4: the luxuriating drudgery does not occur. sent5: if the bathing volcano does not occur then both the modality and the inquest occurs. sent6: the fact that the curve does not occur and/or the bathing stripped does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the uncommunicativeness occurs if the fact that either the curve does not occur or the bathing stripped does not occur or both is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the uncommunicativeness does not occur does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dacoity occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the uncommunicativeness occurs and the dacoity occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the modality does not occur.; sent3 -> int4: the bathing volcano does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: both the modality and the inquest happens.; int5 -> int6: the modality occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the dacoity does not occur.; sent2 & sent4 -> int9: both the anaestheticness and the administrativeness occurs.; int9 -> int10: that the administrativeness happens is true.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__