the fact that the witch-hunter begs or it is not a stroke or both is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that it is a Scythia. sent2: something trivializes Pennsylvanian if it does not knit plutonium. sent3: there is something such that that it does not theme factuality and it does volley is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it themes factuality and it is a volley is not true. sent5: if the fact that the muesli does not saponify hold the Augustinian is a otologist. sent6: the muesli does not saponify if there is something such that it does not volley. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not theme factuality and it does volley is incorrect the muesli does not saponify. sent8: the fact that the witch-hunter does beg and/or is not a kind of a stroke is false if the rain-wash is not current. sent9: the fact that either something begs or it does not stroke or both is correct if it does not knit plutonium. sent10: something is not Bantoid. sent11: there is something such that it is a Scythia but not Bantoid. sent12: something does not theme factuality and is a volley. sent13: the fact that something knits plutonium but it is not current is not correct if it does not trivialize Pennsylvanian. sent14: the witch-hunter does not beg. sent15: the rain-wash does not knit plutonium if something that is a Scythia is not Bantoid. sent16: if there exists something such that it does trivialize Pennsylvanian and is a current the Augustinian is not a otologist. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a current. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it does trivialize Pennsylvanian is correct. sent19: something that does not knit plutonium saponifies. sent20: if the rain-wash is not a current then the witch-hunter does not beg. sent21: something is a Scythia and it is Bantoid.
sent11 & sent15 -> int1: the rain-wash does not knit plutonium.; sent2 -> int2: the rain-wash trivializes Pennsylvanian if it does not knit plutonium.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the rain-wash trivializes Pennsylvanian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rain-wash is a current.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the rain-wash trivializes Pennsylvanian and is current.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it does trivialize Pennsylvanian and is a current.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the Augustinian is not a otologist.; sent3 & sent7 -> int7: the muesli does not saponify.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the Augustinian is a otologist.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the rain-wash is not a current.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the witch-hunter does beg and/or is not a stroke.
sent9 -> int11: if the witch-hunter does not knit plutonium then either it does beg or it does not stroke or both.; sent13 -> int12: if the rain-wash does not trivialize Pennsylvanian that it does knit plutonium and it is not current is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the witch-hunter begs or it is not a stroke or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is a Scythia. sent2: something trivializes Pennsylvanian if it does not knit plutonium. sent3: there is something such that that it does not theme factuality and it does volley is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it themes factuality and it is a volley is not true. sent5: if the fact that the muesli does not saponify hold the Augustinian is a otologist. sent6: the muesli does not saponify if there is something such that it does not volley. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not theme factuality and it does volley is incorrect the muesli does not saponify. sent8: the fact that the witch-hunter does beg and/or is not a kind of a stroke is false if the rain-wash is not current. sent9: the fact that either something begs or it does not stroke or both is correct if it does not knit plutonium. sent10: something is not Bantoid. sent11: there is something such that it is a Scythia but not Bantoid. sent12: something does not theme factuality and is a volley. sent13: the fact that something knits plutonium but it is not current is not correct if it does not trivialize Pennsylvanian. sent14: the witch-hunter does not beg. sent15: the rain-wash does not knit plutonium if something that is a Scythia is not Bantoid. sent16: if there exists something such that it does trivialize Pennsylvanian and is a current the Augustinian is not a otologist. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a current. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it does trivialize Pennsylvanian is correct. sent19: something that does not knit plutonium saponifies. sent20: if the rain-wash is not a current then the witch-hunter does not beg. sent21: something is a Scythia and it is Bantoid. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent15 -> int1: the rain-wash does not knit plutonium.; sent2 -> int2: the rain-wash trivializes Pennsylvanian if it does not knit plutonium.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the rain-wash trivializes Pennsylvanian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rain-wash is a current.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the rain-wash trivializes Pennsylvanian and is current.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it does trivialize Pennsylvanian and is a current.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the Augustinian is not a otologist.; sent3 & sent7 -> int7: the muesli does not saponify.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the Augustinian is a otologist.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the rain-wash is not a current.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__