the Cornishwoman is cytoarchitectural thing that is unsinkable.
sent1: The permissiveness does hand stagecoach. sent2: if the stagecoach is cytoarchitectural then it is not non-four-wheel. sent3: the stagecoach is cytoarchitectural and/or it is unsinkable if there exists something such that the fact that it is a astringency hold. sent4: if the coville is both not four-wheel and not septic then the Cornishwoman is cytoarchitectural. sent5: if the stagecoach does sound and it hands permissiveness the coville is not septic. sent6: the stagecoach does hand permissiveness. sent7: something is four-wheel if the fact that it is unsinkable is not false. sent8: the fact that the winceyette is not a astringency but it is four-wheel is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that something is cytoarchitectural thing that hands permissiveness is not true it is not cytoarchitectural. sent10: the stagecoach does sound. sent11: there is something such that it is not a kind of a astringency and it is four-wheel. sent12: if something is four-wheel then it does hand permissiveness and is not septic. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a astringency and not non-four-wheel does not hold the coville is not non-four-wheel. sent14: if something is a bast it is a astringency. sent15: the Cornishwoman is unsinkable.
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the stagecoach is a kind of sound thing that hands permissiveness.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the coville is not septic.; sent8 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a astringency and it is four-wheel is not correct.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the coville is not four-wheel.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the coville is non-four-wheel and non-septic.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the Cornishwoman is cytoarchitectural is not false.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
that the Cornishwoman is both cytoarchitectural and unsinkable is incorrect.
sent9 -> int7: if the fact that the stagecoach is cytoarchitectural and it hands permissiveness is not correct it is cytoarchitectural.;
$hypothesis$ = the Cornishwoman is cytoarchitectural thing that is unsinkable. ; $context$ = sent1: The permissiveness does hand stagecoach. sent2: if the stagecoach is cytoarchitectural then it is not non-four-wheel. sent3: the stagecoach is cytoarchitectural and/or it is unsinkable if there exists something such that the fact that it is a astringency hold. sent4: if the coville is both not four-wheel and not septic then the Cornishwoman is cytoarchitectural. sent5: if the stagecoach does sound and it hands permissiveness the coville is not septic. sent6: the stagecoach does hand permissiveness. sent7: something is four-wheel if the fact that it is unsinkable is not false. sent8: the fact that the winceyette is not a astringency but it is four-wheel is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that something is cytoarchitectural thing that hands permissiveness is not true it is not cytoarchitectural. sent10: the stagecoach does sound. sent11: there is something such that it is not a kind of a astringency and it is four-wheel. sent12: if something is four-wheel then it does hand permissiveness and is not septic. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a astringency and not non-four-wheel does not hold the coville is not non-four-wheel. sent14: if something is a bast it is a astringency. sent15: the Cornishwoman is unsinkable. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the stagecoach is a kind of sound thing that hands permissiveness.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the coville is not septic.; sent8 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a astringency and it is four-wheel is not correct.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the coville is not four-wheel.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the coville is non-four-wheel and non-septic.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the Cornishwoman is cytoarchitectural is not false.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__