that either the malabsorption does not lunch alcoholism or it is a kind of a conductor or both is not right.
sent1: the fact that either the malabsorption does not lunch alcoholism or it is a conductor or both is not correct if the backbencher is a kind of a fussiness. sent2: something does not lunch alcoholism but it frays if it is a Gamow. sent3: the husky does Simonize gesneriad. sent4: something is a projector and it does Simonize gesneriad. sent5: if something is not a fussiness then the backbencher is a Gamow. sent6: the Ulster is a kind of a Gamow if there exists something such that that it is a projector and it does Simonize gesneriad is false. sent7: if the husky does not fray the fact that the annoyance is a projector and it does Simonize gesneriad is not right. sent8: the husky does not fray. sent9: if something is a barbet then it is a kind of a fussiness. sent10: the malabsorption does lunch alcoholism. sent11: that the Ulster is a Gamow and it Simonizes gesneriad is not right if the annoyance is not a fussiness.
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the annoyance is a projector and Simonizes gesneriad does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a projector and does Simonize gesneriad is false.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the Ulster is a Gamow.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the backbencher is a kind of a fussiness is right if it is a kind of a barbet.;
the malabsorption does not lunch alcoholism or is a kind of a conductor or both.
sent2 -> int5: the malabsorption does not lunch alcoholism but it does fray if it is a Gamow.;
$hypothesis$ = that either the malabsorption does not lunch alcoholism or it is a kind of a conductor or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that either the malabsorption does not lunch alcoholism or it is a conductor or both is not correct if the backbencher is a kind of a fussiness. sent2: something does not lunch alcoholism but it frays if it is a Gamow. sent3: the husky does Simonize gesneriad. sent4: something is a projector and it does Simonize gesneriad. sent5: if something is not a fussiness then the backbencher is a Gamow. sent6: the Ulster is a kind of a Gamow if there exists something such that that it is a projector and it does Simonize gesneriad is false. sent7: if the husky does not fray the fact that the annoyance is a projector and it does Simonize gesneriad is not right. sent8: the husky does not fray. sent9: if something is a barbet then it is a kind of a fussiness. sent10: the malabsorption does lunch alcoholism. sent11: that the Ulster is a Gamow and it Simonizes gesneriad is not right if the annoyance is not a fussiness. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the annoyance is a projector and Simonizes gesneriad does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a projector and does Simonize gesneriad is false.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the Ulster is a Gamow.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the backbencher is a kind of a fussiness is right if it is a kind of a barbet.; __UNKNOWN__