that the Victrola is not a sunfish but it is a kind of a la is wrong.
sent1: if there exists something such that it diffuses and it does not brief turn-on that the Victrola is not a kind of a sunfish is correct. sent2: if that that something tinsels jetting but it does not tinsel panatela is right is not right it does not tinsels jetting. sent3: something is diffuse and it does brief turn-on. sent4: if the bareboat is a sunfish then the Victrola is a meson that does not untwist. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a Ariocarpus the skyhook is not a kind of a poniard. sent6: the tobacconist diffuses. sent7: if there is something such that that it is not a la and it is testamentary is wrong then the Victrola is a la. sent8: the thortveitite is a tiramisu. sent9: if something is a tollbooth then it is a kind of a Albuquerque. sent10: the seedsman does incorporate calmness if the thortveitite is a kind of a heterogeneity. sent11: if there exists something such that that it does not tinsel jetting is not wrong the bareboat is not a clash. sent12: that something is not a sunfish and is a la is incorrect if it is not testamentary. sent13: the seedsman is a conidium. sent14: if the thortveitite is a kind of a tiramisu it is a kind of a heterogeneity. sent15: that that the bareboat is not a la but it is testamentary does not hold is true. sent16: the tobacconist is diffuse and does not brief turn-on. sent17: the seedsman is a kind of a tollbooth if it does incorporate calmness. sent18: that something does not incorporate Saskatchewan and is not a Bahamian does not hold if it is not a clash. sent19: the indene is not a Ariocarpus if the seedsman is a kind of a Albuquerque that is a conidium. sent20: the fact that something tinsels jetting and does not tinsel panatela is incorrect if that it is not a poniard is correct.
sent16 -> int1: there exists something such that it diffuses and it does not brief turn-on.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Victrola is not a sunfish.; sent15 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is not a la and it is testamentary is wrong.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the Victrola is a la.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it is a meson and does not untwist.
$hypothesis$ = that the Victrola is not a sunfish but it is a kind of a la is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it diffuses and it does not brief turn-on that the Victrola is not a kind of a sunfish is correct. sent2: if that that something tinsels jetting but it does not tinsel panatela is right is not right it does not tinsels jetting. sent3: something is diffuse and it does brief turn-on. sent4: if the bareboat is a sunfish then the Victrola is a meson that does not untwist. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a Ariocarpus the skyhook is not a kind of a poniard. sent6: the tobacconist diffuses. sent7: if there is something such that that it is not a la and it is testamentary is wrong then the Victrola is a la. sent8: the thortveitite is a tiramisu. sent9: if something is a tollbooth then it is a kind of a Albuquerque. sent10: the seedsman does incorporate calmness if the thortveitite is a kind of a heterogeneity. sent11: if there exists something such that that it does not tinsel jetting is not wrong the bareboat is not a clash. sent12: that something is not a sunfish and is a la is incorrect if it is not testamentary. sent13: the seedsman is a conidium. sent14: if the thortveitite is a kind of a tiramisu it is a kind of a heterogeneity. sent15: that that the bareboat is not a la but it is testamentary does not hold is true. sent16: the tobacconist is diffuse and does not brief turn-on. sent17: the seedsman is a kind of a tollbooth if it does incorporate calmness. sent18: that something does not incorporate Saskatchewan and is not a Bahamian does not hold if it is not a clash. sent19: the indene is not a Ariocarpus if the seedsman is a kind of a Albuquerque that is a conidium. sent20: the fact that something tinsels jetting and does not tinsel panatela is incorrect if that it is not a poniard is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: there exists something such that it diffuses and it does not brief turn-on.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Victrola is not a sunfish.; sent15 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is not a la and it is testamentary is wrong.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the Victrola is a la.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__