the groupie is a kind of a cytoskeleton.
sent1: the fact that the groupie is not a cytoskeleton is incorrect if the pasha is a cytoskeleton. sent2: the fuchsia is uveal. sent3: if that something does not exalt tepee is not false then it is non-moneran and is a kind of a digitigrade. sent4: the spear scoffs scoter. sent5: if the spear does scoff scoter then the fuchsia is a intractability. sent6: if that something embowers and is uveal is wrong then it is not uveal. sent7: the groupie is uveal. sent8: that the spear embowers and is uveal does not hold if it is not a toecap. sent9: something that does exalt tepee is a cytoskeleton. sent10: if the pasha is not non-moneran then that it is a Sutherland is correct. sent11: The scoter scoffs spear. sent12: something is a kind of a Sutherland if it is uveal. sent13: the fact that the eggnog is not uveal is not right if the pasha exalts tepee. sent14: the groupie is not a cytoskeleton if the pasha is not moneran but it is digitigrade. sent15: if the eggnog is a Sutherland then the fact that the fuchsia is not a toecap but it does embower is true. sent16: if the eggnog is a cytoskeleton the pasha is a cytoskeleton. sent17: if the fuchsia is not a kind of a toecap but it embowers then it is not a intractability. sent18: the spear is not a toecap.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pasha exalts tepee.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the eggnog is uveal.; sent12 -> int2: if the eggnog is uveal then it is a kind of a Sutherland.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eggnog is a Sutherland.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the fuchsia is not a toecap and embowers.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the fuchsia is not a kind of a intractability.; sent5 & sent4 -> int6: that the fuchsia is a intractability is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the pasha does not exalt tepee.; sent3 -> int9: if the pasha does not exalt tepee then it is non-moneran a digitigrade.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the pasha is both not moneran and digitigrade.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the groupie is a cytoskeleton.
sent9 -> int11: if the fact that the eggnog does exalt tepee is not incorrect then it is a cytoskeleton.; sent6 -> int12: if the fact that the spear embowers and is uveal is not right it is not uveal.; sent8 & sent18 -> int13: the fact that the spear does embower and it is uveal is wrong.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the spear is not uveal.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it is not uveal.;
$hypothesis$ = the groupie is a kind of a cytoskeleton. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the groupie is not a cytoskeleton is incorrect if the pasha is a cytoskeleton. sent2: the fuchsia is uveal. sent3: if that something does not exalt tepee is not false then it is non-moneran and is a kind of a digitigrade. sent4: the spear scoffs scoter. sent5: if the spear does scoff scoter then the fuchsia is a intractability. sent6: if that something embowers and is uveal is wrong then it is not uveal. sent7: the groupie is uveal. sent8: that the spear embowers and is uveal does not hold if it is not a toecap. sent9: something that does exalt tepee is a cytoskeleton. sent10: if the pasha is not non-moneran then that it is a Sutherland is correct. sent11: The scoter scoffs spear. sent12: something is a kind of a Sutherland if it is uveal. sent13: the fact that the eggnog is not uveal is not right if the pasha exalts tepee. sent14: the groupie is not a cytoskeleton if the pasha is not moneran but it is digitigrade. sent15: if the eggnog is a Sutherland then the fact that the fuchsia is not a toecap but it does embower is true. sent16: if the eggnog is a cytoskeleton the pasha is a cytoskeleton. sent17: if the fuchsia is not a kind of a toecap but it embowers then it is not a intractability. sent18: the spear is not a toecap. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pasha exalts tepee.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the eggnog is uveal.; sent12 -> int2: if the eggnog is uveal then it is a kind of a Sutherland.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eggnog is a Sutherland.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the fuchsia is not a toecap and embowers.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the fuchsia is not a kind of a intractability.; sent5 & sent4 -> int6: that the fuchsia is a intractability is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the pasha does not exalt tepee.; sent3 -> int9: if the pasha does not exalt tepee then it is non-moneran a digitigrade.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the pasha is both not moneran and digitigrade.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__