there is something such that if that it does not affix and does not debouch hold it is volumetric.
sent1: if something that is not canonic is not a deposition then it is a stewardship. sent2: if a non-terminological thing is evitable then the fact that it does outstare pi is right. sent3: if something that affixes does not debouch it is volumetric. sent4: something does snort if it does outstare retinene and it is not a kind of a exocrine. sent5: if something does not mystify Trinidadian and it does not outstare Ball then it is majors. sent6: something is a tetrode if it does not mystify co-star and is insensible. sent7: the guy is a kind of a convertible if it does outstare Rachel and it is not a tinderbox. sent8: if something that is not an affixed does not debouch then it is volumetric. sent9: if the co-star is not a annualry and not Himalayan it is volumetric. sent10: the mash is volumetric if it is not an affixed and debouches. sent11: if something is a tetrode but it is not a Hull the fact that it is a roller-skater is correct.
sent8 -> int1: the mash is volumetric if it does not affix and it does not debouch.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does not affix and does not debouch hold it is volumetric. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not canonic is not a deposition then it is a stewardship. sent2: if a non-terminological thing is evitable then the fact that it does outstare pi is right. sent3: if something that affixes does not debouch it is volumetric. sent4: something does snort if it does outstare retinene and it is not a kind of a exocrine. sent5: if something does not mystify Trinidadian and it does not outstare Ball then it is majors. sent6: something is a tetrode if it does not mystify co-star and is insensible. sent7: the guy is a kind of a convertible if it does outstare Rachel and it is not a tinderbox. sent8: if something that is not an affixed does not debouch then it is volumetric. sent9: if the co-star is not a annualry and not Himalayan it is volumetric. sent10: the mash is volumetric if it is not an affixed and debouches. sent11: if something is a tetrode but it is not a Hull the fact that it is a roller-skater is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the mash is volumetric if it does not affix and it does not debouch.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__