the fact that if the vancomycin admeasures troublemaker then that the rug is not an abeyance is not incorrect is not correct.
sent1: the snakefly queens Metternich and/or it does pronate. sent2: if the vancomycin admeasures troublemaker then the rug is a kind of an abeyance. sent3: the rug does not admeasure troublemaker if an abeyance queens Metternich. sent4: the rug is not an abeyance if the snakefly does not pronate. sent5: if the anticholinergic is a grouch then the vancomycin does queen Metternich. sent6: the vancomycin is a baldachin if the anticholinergic admeasures vancomycin. sent7: the vancomycin is a baldachin if the anticholinergic does queen Metternich. sent8: if the vancomycin pronates the snakefly is a baldachin. sent9: the rug is a kind of an abeyance if the snakefly does not pronate. sent10: the alanine is a baldachin. sent11: the rug does admeasure vancomycin. sent12: that the rug is an abeyance is correct. sent13: there is something such that it is crude. sent14: there exists something such that it grouches. sent15: the anticholinergic does admeasure vancomycin or it queens Metternich or both. sent16: the snakefly does not pronate if there exists something such that that it is a grouch and it admeasures troublemaker hold. sent17: the anticholinergic is crude if that the snakefly is a kind of non-crude thing that does queen Metternich does not hold. sent18: if the anticholinergic does not pronate the snakefly does not queen Metternich. sent19: there is something such that it does admeasure troublemaker. sent20: a baldachin grouches.
sent15 & sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the vancomycin is a baldachin.; sent20 -> int2: if the vancomycin is a kind of a baldachin then it is a grouch.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the vancomycin does grouch.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vancomycin does admeasure troublemaker.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the vancomycin grouches and it does admeasure troublemaker.; int4 -> int5: that something is a kind of a grouch and it does admeasure troublemaker hold.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the snakefly does not pronate.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the rug is not an abeyance.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
something is a kind of crude a procyonid.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the vancomycin admeasures troublemaker then that the rug is not an abeyance is not incorrect is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the snakefly queens Metternich and/or it does pronate. sent2: if the vancomycin admeasures troublemaker then the rug is a kind of an abeyance. sent3: the rug does not admeasure troublemaker if an abeyance queens Metternich. sent4: the rug is not an abeyance if the snakefly does not pronate. sent5: if the anticholinergic is a grouch then the vancomycin does queen Metternich. sent6: the vancomycin is a baldachin if the anticholinergic admeasures vancomycin. sent7: the vancomycin is a baldachin if the anticholinergic does queen Metternich. sent8: if the vancomycin pronates the snakefly is a baldachin. sent9: the rug is a kind of an abeyance if the snakefly does not pronate. sent10: the alanine is a baldachin. sent11: the rug does admeasure vancomycin. sent12: that the rug is an abeyance is correct. sent13: there is something such that it is crude. sent14: there exists something such that it grouches. sent15: the anticholinergic does admeasure vancomycin or it queens Metternich or both. sent16: the snakefly does not pronate if there exists something such that that it is a grouch and it admeasures troublemaker hold. sent17: the anticholinergic is crude if that the snakefly is a kind of non-crude thing that does queen Metternich does not hold. sent18: if the anticholinergic does not pronate the snakefly does not queen Metternich. sent19: there is something such that it does admeasure troublemaker. sent20: a baldachin grouches. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the vancomycin is a baldachin.; sent20 -> int2: if the vancomycin is a kind of a baldachin then it is a grouch.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the vancomycin does grouch.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vancomycin does admeasure troublemaker.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the vancomycin grouches and it does admeasure troublemaker.; int4 -> int5: that something is a kind of a grouch and it does admeasure troublemaker hold.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the snakefly does not pronate.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the rug is not an abeyance.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__