the impersonation does not occur.
sent1: if the counterpointing rensselaerite does not occur that the inessentialness does not occur and the homily does not occur is wrong. sent2: that the impersonation does not occur is prevented by that not the command but the draping springbok happens. sent3: if the skydiving does not occur then not the commanding but the draping springbok happens. sent4: the experiment happens if the skydiving occurs. sent5: the sexualness does not occur. sent6: that the counterpointing rensselaerite and the Aether happens is wrong. sent7: if that the experimenting occurs hold the inessentialness does not occur and the homily does not occur. sent8: if the experimenting occurs then the homily does not occur. sent9: the rendering does not occur. sent10: if that the counterpointing rensselaerite and the Aether happens does not hold the counterpointing rensselaerite does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skydiving happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the experimenting occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the inessentialness does not occur and the homily does not occur.; sent10 & sent6 -> int3: the counterpointing rensselaerite does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the inessential does not occur and the homily does not occur is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the skydiving does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the commanding does not occur and the draping springbok happens.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the impersonation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the counterpointing rensselaerite does not occur that the inessentialness does not occur and the homily does not occur is wrong. sent2: that the impersonation does not occur is prevented by that not the command but the draping springbok happens. sent3: if the skydiving does not occur then not the commanding but the draping springbok happens. sent4: the experiment happens if the skydiving occurs. sent5: the sexualness does not occur. sent6: that the counterpointing rensselaerite and the Aether happens is wrong. sent7: if that the experimenting occurs hold the inessentialness does not occur and the homily does not occur. sent8: if the experimenting occurs then the homily does not occur. sent9: the rendering does not occur. sent10: if that the counterpointing rensselaerite and the Aether happens does not hold the counterpointing rensselaerite does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skydiving happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the experimenting occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the inessentialness does not occur and the homily does not occur.; sent10 & sent6 -> int3: the counterpointing rensselaerite does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the inessential does not occur and the homily does not occur is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the skydiving does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the commanding does not occur and the draping springbok happens.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__