the decongestant is not remediable.
sent1: either the syncarp does not peregrinate or it does not depressurize bib or both. sent2: if the syncarp does not peregrinate the fact that the succession does not depressurize blouse is true. sent3: if that the ornamentation is a kind of a eta and is not a Kastler is not right that the Mugwump is not a eta hold. sent4: the fact that something is a belay and not a Cordylus is not right if it does not peregrinate. sent5: if something is not a eta the fact that it is a Abutilon hold. sent6: the fact that the decongestant is non-brahminic thing that does not depressurize ornamentation is not false if something is a Abutilon. sent7: something does not credit mumbling if it either is not autocatalytic or is illogical or both. sent8: the succession does not depressurize blouse if the syncarp does not depressurize bib. sent9: the ornamentation does not enter gangsaw. sent10: if the decongestant does depressurize blouse it is not a Trafalgar and is not remediable. sent11: if the decongestant is a Trafalgar it does not credit mumbling. sent12: the syncarp is not a kind of a ministry if that the bassoon is not a Trafalgar and does not incurvate Ephedraceae is not correct. sent13: if that something does depressurize bib and/or does not depressurize blouse does not hold then it does not peregrinate. sent14: the decongestant is autocatalytic if it does not credit mumbling and is not logical. sent15: that the ornamentation is a eta but it is not a Kastler does not hold if it does not enter gangsaw. sent16: either the bassoon is not autocatalytic or it is not logical or both if the succession is not remediable. sent17: if the decongestant is autocatalytic then it is remediable. sent18: the bassoon is not a ministry and does not depressurize bib. sent19: that something is not a Trafalgar and it does not incurvate Ephedraceae is not correct if it does not credit mumbling. sent20: the succession is autocatalytic if it depressurizes blouse. sent21: that if a non-brahminic thing does not depressurize ornamentation then the succession is not remediable is correct. sent22: the fact that the perspirer depressurizes bib or does not depressurize blouse or both is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a ministry is not wrong. sent23: if something is a Trafalgar then it does not credit mumbling and is not logical. sent24: the decongestant is a Trafalgar if the fact that the bassoon incurvates Ephedraceae and is not a ministry is not right. sent25: if the succession does not depressurize blouse then that that the bassoon incurvates Ephedraceae and is not a ministry does not hold is correct. sent26: if something does peregrinate then it is not remediable.
sent1 & sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the succession does not depressurize blouse.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the fact that the bassoon does incurvate Ephedraceae but it is not a ministry is incorrect.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the decongestant is a Trafalgar.; sent23 -> int4: that the decongestant does not credit mumbling and it is not logical if the decongestant is a Trafalgar hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the decongestant does not credit mumbling and it is not logical.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the decongestant is autocatalytic.; int6 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the perspirer belays but it is not a Cordylus is wrong.
sent4 -> int7: the fact that the perspirer is a belay that is not a Cordylus is not true if it does not peregrinate.; sent13 -> int8: the perspirer does not peregrinate if that it depressurizes bib and/or it does not depressurize blouse does not hold.; sent19 -> int9: that the bassoon is not a Trafalgar and it does not incurvate Ephedraceae does not hold if it does not credit mumbling.; sent7 -> int10: that the bassoon does not credit mumbling is not false if either it is not autocatalytic or it is not logical or both.; sent5 -> int11: the Mugwump is a kind of a Abutilon if it is not a eta.; sent15 & sent9 -> int12: that the fact that the ornamentation is a eta but it is not a kind of a Kastler is not false is not true.; sent3 & int12 -> int13: the Mugwump is not a eta.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the Mugwump is a Abutilon.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it is a kind of a Abutilon.; int15 & sent6 -> int16: the decongestant is not brahminic and it does not depressurize ornamentation.; int16 -> int17: something is non-brahminic thing that does not depressurize ornamentation.; int17 & sent21 -> int18: the succession is not remediable.; sent16 & int18 -> int19: the bassoon is not autocatalytic or is not logical or both.; int10 & int19 -> int20: the bassoon does not credit mumbling.; int9 & int20 -> int21: the fact that the bassoon is not a kind of a Trafalgar and it does not incurvate Ephedraceae does not hold.; sent12 & int21 -> int22: the syncarp is not a kind of a ministry.; int22 -> int23: there is something such that it is not a kind of a ministry.; int23 & sent22 -> int24: that the perspirer does depressurize bib and/or does not depressurize blouse is incorrect.; int8 & int24 -> int25: the perspirer does not peregrinate.; int7 & int25 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the decongestant is not remediable. ; $context$ = sent1: either the syncarp does not peregrinate or it does not depressurize bib or both. sent2: if the syncarp does not peregrinate the fact that the succession does not depressurize blouse is true. sent3: if that the ornamentation is a kind of a eta and is not a Kastler is not right that the Mugwump is not a eta hold. sent4: the fact that something is a belay and not a Cordylus is not right if it does not peregrinate. sent5: if something is not a eta the fact that it is a Abutilon hold. sent6: the fact that the decongestant is non-brahminic thing that does not depressurize ornamentation is not false if something is a Abutilon. sent7: something does not credit mumbling if it either is not autocatalytic or is illogical or both. sent8: the succession does not depressurize blouse if the syncarp does not depressurize bib. sent9: the ornamentation does not enter gangsaw. sent10: if the decongestant does depressurize blouse it is not a Trafalgar and is not remediable. sent11: if the decongestant is a Trafalgar it does not credit mumbling. sent12: the syncarp is not a kind of a ministry if that the bassoon is not a Trafalgar and does not incurvate Ephedraceae is not correct. sent13: if that something does depressurize bib and/or does not depressurize blouse does not hold then it does not peregrinate. sent14: the decongestant is autocatalytic if it does not credit mumbling and is not logical. sent15: that the ornamentation is a eta but it is not a Kastler does not hold if it does not enter gangsaw. sent16: either the bassoon is not autocatalytic or it is not logical or both if the succession is not remediable. sent17: if the decongestant is autocatalytic then it is remediable. sent18: the bassoon is not a ministry and does not depressurize bib. sent19: that something is not a Trafalgar and it does not incurvate Ephedraceae is not correct if it does not credit mumbling. sent20: the succession is autocatalytic if it depressurizes blouse. sent21: that if a non-brahminic thing does not depressurize ornamentation then the succession is not remediable is correct. sent22: the fact that the perspirer depressurizes bib or does not depressurize blouse or both is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a ministry is not wrong. sent23: if something is a Trafalgar then it does not credit mumbling and is not logical. sent24: the decongestant is a Trafalgar if the fact that the bassoon incurvates Ephedraceae and is not a ministry is not right. sent25: if the succession does not depressurize blouse then that that the bassoon incurvates Ephedraceae and is not a ministry does not hold is correct. sent26: if something does peregrinate then it is not remediable. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the succession does not depressurize blouse.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the fact that the bassoon does incurvate Ephedraceae but it is not a ministry is incorrect.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the decongestant is a Trafalgar.; sent23 -> int4: that the decongestant does not credit mumbling and it is not logical if the decongestant is a Trafalgar hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the decongestant does not credit mumbling and it is not logical.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the decongestant is autocatalytic.; int6 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__