the avocado does maintain Barbarossa.
sent1: if the fact that the catheter does not maintain Barbarossa hold the avocado does not maintain Barbarossa. sent2: the catheter is a modeler if that it is not an e and does not suckle scintillation does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the aluminate is not an e and is not a kind of a modeler does not hold it does suckle loofa. sent4: the catheter suckles scintillation if there is something such that that it is not a agelessness and it is not a temporal does not hold. sent5: if the aluminate wails BMI then the catheter does suckle loofa. sent6: if the fact that either something is not a mushiness or it does suckle scintillation or both does not hold then it does not maintain Barbarossa. sent7: there exists something such that it does not club. sent8: if the catheter does not wail BMI then the avocado maintains Barbarossa. sent9: the aluminate is a modeler if it is a kind of a Tartary. sent10: the speakeasy is not an e. sent11: if there is something such that it is not a clubbing then that the aluminate is not an e but a modeler does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it is not a agelessness and not a temporal is incorrect. sent13: that something is not an e and does not wail BMI is not true if it is a modeler. sent14: if there is something such that it is a kind of a agelessness that the catheter suckles scintillation is not incorrect. sent15: the wort is a kind of a Tartary. sent16: if the fact that something is not a mushiness but it does suckle scintillation is wrong then it is not a agelessness. sent17: that the aluminate is not an e and it is not a modeler is incorrect if something is not a clubbing. sent18: that something is not a kind of a mushiness and/or it does suckle scintillation is not true if it does not suckle loofa. sent19: either the aluminate is a clubbing or it is a Tartary or both if there exists something such that it is a Tartary. sent20: something does not wail BMI if that it is not a mushiness is incorrect.
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the catheter suckles scintillation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the catheter is not a mushiness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the catheter suckles scintillation and is not a kind of a mushiness.; sent7 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the aluminate is not an e and it is not a modeler is incorrect.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the aluminate suckles loofa.; sent20 -> int5: the catheter does not wail BMI if it is a kind of a mushiness.;
the catheter is not a agelessness.
sent16 -> int6: the catheter is not a agelessness if the fact that it is not a mushiness and it does suckle scintillation is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the avocado does maintain Barbarossa. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the catheter does not maintain Barbarossa hold the avocado does not maintain Barbarossa. sent2: the catheter is a modeler if that it is not an e and does not suckle scintillation does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the aluminate is not an e and is not a kind of a modeler does not hold it does suckle loofa. sent4: the catheter suckles scintillation if there is something such that that it is not a agelessness and it is not a temporal does not hold. sent5: if the aluminate wails BMI then the catheter does suckle loofa. sent6: if the fact that either something is not a mushiness or it does suckle scintillation or both does not hold then it does not maintain Barbarossa. sent7: there exists something such that it does not club. sent8: if the catheter does not wail BMI then the avocado maintains Barbarossa. sent9: the aluminate is a modeler if it is a kind of a Tartary. sent10: the speakeasy is not an e. sent11: if there is something such that it is not a clubbing then that the aluminate is not an e but a modeler does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it is not a agelessness and not a temporal is incorrect. sent13: that something is not an e and does not wail BMI is not true if it is a modeler. sent14: if there is something such that it is a kind of a agelessness that the catheter suckles scintillation is not incorrect. sent15: the wort is a kind of a Tartary. sent16: if the fact that something is not a mushiness but it does suckle scintillation is wrong then it is not a agelessness. sent17: that the aluminate is not an e and it is not a modeler is incorrect if something is not a clubbing. sent18: that something is not a kind of a mushiness and/or it does suckle scintillation is not true if it does not suckle loofa. sent19: either the aluminate is a clubbing or it is a Tartary or both if there exists something such that it is a Tartary. sent20: something does not wail BMI if that it is not a mushiness is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the catheter suckles scintillation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the catheter is not a mushiness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the catheter suckles scintillation and is not a kind of a mushiness.; sent7 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the aluminate is not an e and it is not a modeler is incorrect.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the aluminate suckles loofa.; sent20 -> int5: the catheter does not wail BMI if it is a kind of a mushiness.; __UNKNOWN__