both the lacrimalness and the morphologicness happens.
sent1: the lacrimalness and the tear occurs. sent2: the continentness happens and the morphologicness happens. sent3: if the Michelangelesqueness does not occur then that the shooting happens but the enjoying AWOL does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the morphologicness occurs or that the continentness does not occur or both triggers the diplomaticness. sent5: that if that the shooting occurs but the enjoying AWOL does not occur does not hold the light-dutiness does not occur is not false. sent6: that both the postmodernistness and the non-Michelangelesqueness occurs is triggered by that the monotonicness does not occur. sent7: if the beating achromia does not occur the enjoying cover-up and the non-ebracteateness occurs. sent8: the non-passionateness yields that the spooning yew happens and the telling occurs. sent9: the incontinentness and the tearing occurs if the enjoying Agonus happens. sent10: that the enjoying cover-up occurs and the ebracteateness does not occur leads to that the snuffling minster does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the reflectiveness occurs and the passionateness occurs is false then the passionateness does not occur. sent12: if the continentness does not occur the fact that both the lacrimalness and the morphologicness occurs is false. sent13: the monotonicness does not occur if the spooning yew happens. sent14: if the light-dutiness does not occur both the enjoying Agonus and the recidivism happens. sent15: if the snuffling minster does not occur that the reflectiveness and the passionateness happens is not correct.
sent2 -> int1: the morphologicness occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the lacrimalness happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the lacrimalness happens and the morphologicness occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = both the lacrimalness and the morphologicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the lacrimalness and the tear occurs. sent2: the continentness happens and the morphologicness happens. sent3: if the Michelangelesqueness does not occur then that the shooting happens but the enjoying AWOL does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the morphologicness occurs or that the continentness does not occur or both triggers the diplomaticness. sent5: that if that the shooting occurs but the enjoying AWOL does not occur does not hold the light-dutiness does not occur is not false. sent6: that both the postmodernistness and the non-Michelangelesqueness occurs is triggered by that the monotonicness does not occur. sent7: if the beating achromia does not occur the enjoying cover-up and the non-ebracteateness occurs. sent8: the non-passionateness yields that the spooning yew happens and the telling occurs. sent9: the incontinentness and the tearing occurs if the enjoying Agonus happens. sent10: that the enjoying cover-up occurs and the ebracteateness does not occur leads to that the snuffling minster does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the reflectiveness occurs and the passionateness occurs is false then the passionateness does not occur. sent12: if the continentness does not occur the fact that both the lacrimalness and the morphologicness occurs is false. sent13: the monotonicness does not occur if the spooning yew happens. sent14: if the light-dutiness does not occur both the enjoying Agonus and the recidivism happens. sent15: if the snuffling minster does not occur that the reflectiveness and the passionateness happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the morphologicness occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the lacrimalness happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__