that the Democraticness does not occur and/or the constructing marblewood does not occur is false.
sent1: the Gambian and the few happens. sent2: the depression and the glassing happens. sent3: that both the Gambianness and the non-paroxysmalness occurs leads to that the constructing marblewood does not occur. sent4: that the paroxysmalness happens or the zapping does not occur or both is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paroxysmalness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the paroxysmalness happens or the zap does not occur or both.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the paroxysmalness does not occur.; sent1 -> int4: the Gambianness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Gambianness happens but the paroxysmalness does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the constructing marblewood does not occur.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Democraticness does not occur and/or the constructing marblewood does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the Gambian and the few happens. sent2: the depression and the glassing happens. sent3: that both the Gambianness and the non-paroxysmalness occurs leads to that the constructing marblewood does not occur. sent4: that the paroxysmalness happens or the zapping does not occur or both is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paroxysmalness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the paroxysmalness happens or the zap does not occur or both.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the paroxysmalness does not occur.; sent1 -> int4: the Gambianness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Gambianness happens but the paroxysmalness does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the constructing marblewood does not occur.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__