that there exists something such that if it is not a diabetic and is not near then it is not a Empetraceae is not right.
sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a saskatoon and it does not guard cosmid it does idealize radiochlorine hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a diabetic and is not near that it is not a Empetraceae is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not apprehend and does not idealize pleasantry it is not a kind of a Lithuanian. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is unitary and it is not a amide is true it is not a distrust is not wrong. sent5: that the sandstone is non-diabetic is not wrong if it is not a river and is non-bladdery. sent6: if the sandstone is not a diabetic and it is not near that it is not a Empetraceae is not wrong. sent7: there is something such that if it is both not a polish and not a scullery then it is non-bibliothecal. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not unfriendly and it is not flowery then it does not plot. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a diabetic that is not near it is not a Empetraceae. sent10: something is not diabetic if it is not a kind of a homonym and does not idealize ashram. sent11: there is something such that if it is a lockout and it does not idealize headline it is not a chevre.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
if the trough is not a homonym and it does not idealize ashram it is not a diabetic.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a diabetic and is not near then it is not a Empetraceae is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a saskatoon and it does not guard cosmid it does idealize radiochlorine hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a diabetic and is not near that it is not a Empetraceae is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not apprehend and does not idealize pleasantry it is not a kind of a Lithuanian. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is unitary and it is not a amide is true it is not a distrust is not wrong. sent5: that the sandstone is non-diabetic is not wrong if it is not a river and is non-bladdery. sent6: if the sandstone is not a diabetic and it is not near that it is not a Empetraceae is not wrong. sent7: there is something such that if it is both not a polish and not a scullery then it is non-bibliothecal. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not unfriendly and it is not flowery then it does not plot. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a diabetic that is not near it is not a Empetraceae. sent10: something is not diabetic if it is not a kind of a homonym and does not idealize ashram. sent11: there is something such that if it is a lockout and it does not idealize headline it is not a chevre. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__