the crow does not uncork subjectivism and/or boogies.
sent1: the fact that the crow is a kind of noncommercial thing that does not uncork crow is not right. sent2: if something does not boogie the fact that it is a saga and is not noncommercial does not hold. sent3: something that does not anger is a kind of an inventory and is intelligent. sent4: the crow uncorks subjectivism and/or is a boogie. sent5: the crow is not a boogie and/or is prosthetics. sent6: everything is a saga. sent7: the crow is a saga. sent8: everything is both a saga and not noncommercial. sent9: that something does not uncork subjectivism or is a boogie or both does not hold if it is intelligent.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the crow is a kind of a saga but it is not noncommercial is not true if it is not a boogie.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crow is not a boogie.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the crow is both a saga and not noncommercial is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the crow is a saga but it is not noncommercial.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the crow boogies.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that the crow does not uncork subjectivism or it is a boogie or both does not hold.
sent9 -> int6: the fact that the crow does not uncork subjectivism or is a boogie or both is false if it is intelligent.; sent3 -> int7: if the crow is not an anger then it is an inventory but not unintelligent.;
$hypothesis$ = the crow does not uncork subjectivism and/or boogies. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the crow is a kind of noncommercial thing that does not uncork crow is not right. sent2: if something does not boogie the fact that it is a saga and is not noncommercial does not hold. sent3: something that does not anger is a kind of an inventory and is intelligent. sent4: the crow uncorks subjectivism and/or is a boogie. sent5: the crow is not a boogie and/or is prosthetics. sent6: everything is a saga. sent7: the crow is a saga. sent8: everything is both a saga and not noncommercial. sent9: that something does not uncork subjectivism or is a boogie or both does not hold if it is intelligent. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the crow is a kind of a saga but it is not noncommercial is not true if it is not a boogie.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crow is not a boogie.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the crow is both a saga and not noncommercial is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the crow is a saga but it is not noncommercial.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the crow boogies.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__