the famine does not occur.
sent1: that the contributing trillium occurs and the constipating does not occur is false. sent2: the countermeasure occurs. sent3: that the countermeasure does not occur triggers that both the setting viverrine and the non-thallophyticness happens. sent4: if the countermeasure does not occur then both the non-thallophyticness and the setting viverrine happens. sent5: that the countermeasure happens is right if the fact that the unsavoriness does not occur hold. sent6: if that that the contributing minocycline happens and the similarness occurs is true is not right then that the similarness does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: the allopathy happens and the Mishnaicness happens. sent8: that the countermeasure occurs but the contributing paleoecology does not occur does not hold if the setting viverrine does not occur. sent9: the contributing minocycline occurs if that the blackening happens is true. sent10: the unsavoriness does not occur. sent11: that the countermeasure but not the contributing paleoecology happens is triggered by that the unsavoriness does not occur. sent12: the droning suffix occurs. sent13: the contributing screenplay does not occur if the fact that the synchronizing but not the droning anesthetic occurs does not hold. sent14: the thallophyticness occurs if the extinguishing HS2 occurs. sent15: the extinguishing HS2 occurs. sent16: if the repechage happens then the blighting occurs. sent17: the fact that the contributing minocycline and the similarness occurs is incorrect if the contributing screenplay does not occur. sent18: the fact that the extinguishing Hipparchus does not occur is false. sent19: that the setting viverrine does not occur is brought about by that the thallophyticness happens and the famine happens. sent20: if the similarness does not occur the contributing paleoecology does not occur and the unsavoriness happens. sent21: the sugarlessness but not the fumigation happens.
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the thallophyticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the famine happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the thallophyticness occurs and the famine occurs.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the setting viverrine does not occur.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the countermeasure happens but the contributing paleoecology does not occur is incorrect.; sent11 & sent10 -> int5: the countermeasure happens and the contributing paleoecology does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the famine occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the famine does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the contributing trillium occurs and the constipating does not occur is false. sent2: the countermeasure occurs. sent3: that the countermeasure does not occur triggers that both the setting viverrine and the non-thallophyticness happens. sent4: if the countermeasure does not occur then both the non-thallophyticness and the setting viverrine happens. sent5: that the countermeasure happens is right if the fact that the unsavoriness does not occur hold. sent6: if that that the contributing minocycline happens and the similarness occurs is true is not right then that the similarness does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: the allopathy happens and the Mishnaicness happens. sent8: that the countermeasure occurs but the contributing paleoecology does not occur does not hold if the setting viverrine does not occur. sent9: the contributing minocycline occurs if that the blackening happens is true. sent10: the unsavoriness does not occur. sent11: that the countermeasure but not the contributing paleoecology happens is triggered by that the unsavoriness does not occur. sent12: the droning suffix occurs. sent13: the contributing screenplay does not occur if the fact that the synchronizing but not the droning anesthetic occurs does not hold. sent14: the thallophyticness occurs if the extinguishing HS2 occurs. sent15: the extinguishing HS2 occurs. sent16: if the repechage happens then the blighting occurs. sent17: the fact that the contributing minocycline and the similarness occurs is incorrect if the contributing screenplay does not occur. sent18: the fact that the extinguishing Hipparchus does not occur is false. sent19: that the setting viverrine does not occur is brought about by that the thallophyticness happens and the famine happens. sent20: if the similarness does not occur the contributing paleoecology does not occur and the unsavoriness happens. sent21: the sugarlessness but not the fumigation happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the thallophyticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the famine happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the thallophyticness occurs and the famine occurs.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the setting viverrine does not occur.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the countermeasure happens but the contributing paleoecology does not occur is incorrect.; sent11 & sent10 -> int5: the countermeasure happens and the contributing paleoecology does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__