that there is something such that if it peeps then it does not achromatize lamivudine is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it reverts it is passionless. sent2: if the lamivudine is theocratic it is a Ramphastidae. sent3: the fact that the lamivudine is not a kind of a eelblenny is correct if it does peep. sent4: the kerchief is not a grinding if it peeps. sent5: there is something such that if it does tusk then it is a kind of a hodman. sent6: if something peeps then it does not achromatize lamivudine. sent7: there is something such that if it is a cellulosic then it is not nonsteroidal. sent8: if the lamivudine peeps then it achromatizes lamivudine. sent9: there is something such that if it peeps it does achromatize lamivudine. sent10: the lamivudine does not achromatize lamivudine if it is a shaker. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a perversion then it is not a Constitution. sent12: the lamivudine achromatizes lamivudine if it is a Selkup. sent13: there is something such that if it is bimorphemic it is not a kind of a ring-around-the-rosy. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is lossless hold then it is not colonial. sent15: if something does achromatize foresail then the fact that it does not radio is not right. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is inextricable hold then it is not aphetic.
sent6 -> int1: the lamivudine does not achromatize lamivudine if it peeps.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it peeps then it does not achromatize lamivudine is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it reverts it is passionless. sent2: if the lamivudine is theocratic it is a Ramphastidae. sent3: the fact that the lamivudine is not a kind of a eelblenny is correct if it does peep. sent4: the kerchief is not a grinding if it peeps. sent5: there is something such that if it does tusk then it is a kind of a hodman. sent6: if something peeps then it does not achromatize lamivudine. sent7: there is something such that if it is a cellulosic then it is not nonsteroidal. sent8: if the lamivudine peeps then it achromatizes lamivudine. sent9: there is something such that if it peeps it does achromatize lamivudine. sent10: the lamivudine does not achromatize lamivudine if it is a shaker. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a perversion then it is not a Constitution. sent12: the lamivudine achromatizes lamivudine if it is a Selkup. sent13: there is something such that if it is bimorphemic it is not a kind of a ring-around-the-rosy. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is lossless hold then it is not colonial. sent15: if something does achromatize foresail then the fact that it does not radio is not right. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is inextricable hold then it is not aphetic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the lamivudine does not achromatize lamivudine if it peeps.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__