the whip-snake is cenobitic.
sent1: the ramipril is not non-ophthalmic. sent2: the ramipril does bulldog. sent3: if the toolbox is a bulldog the fact that the whip-snake is cenobitic is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the ramipril does redeploy gaudy hold if the proprietress is not a squill and it does not redeploy gaudy. sent5: the ramipril redeploys gaudy and it is a abbess if the proprietress is not a bulldog. sent6: if the ramipril redeploys gaudy and it scants then the cottontail does not scants. sent7: if the ramipril does not redeploy Spica and/or it is not a perithecium then it does not redeploy gaudy. sent8: the ramipril does not redeploy Spica and/or is not a perithecium. sent9: the proprietress is a abbess if the ramipril is a squill that does not redeploy gaudy. sent10: if the cottontail does not scant the whip-snake is not cenobitic. sent11: the toolbox does redeploy Spica and does scant if the cottontail is not a squill. sent12: if the fact that something is not a bulldog is not incorrect then it is a kind of a abbess and scants. sent13: the cottontail scants. sent14: if the proprietress is a abbess then the fact that the toolbox is a bulldog is right. sent15: if the ramipril is not a kind of a perithecium then it does not redeploy gaudy. sent16: the proprietress does redeploy Spica and it is a kind of a perithecium if there is something such that it is not a sedative-hypnotic. sent17: the ramipril does not redeploy Spica or it is a perithecium or both. sent18: the stemmer is weightless if the KBO does account. sent19: the toolbox is not a kind of a perithecium. sent20: the thurifer is dioecious. sent21: the ramipril is a squill if the cottontail scants. sent22: if the stemmer is weightless it is not non-ophthalmic. sent23: the proprietress is a perithecium. sent24: if the stemmer is ophthalmic then the toolbox is piratical thing that is not a sedative-hypnotic. sent25: if the fact that the cottontail does scant but it is not a perithecium is correct then the ramipril redeploys gaudy. sent26: if the KBO is weightless then the stemmer is weightless. sent27: either the KBO accounts or it is not weighty or both.
sent21 & sent13 -> int1: the ramipril is a squill.; sent7 & sent8 -> int2: the ramipril does not redeploy gaudy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ramipril is a squill that does not redeploy gaudy.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the proprietress is a abbess.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the toolbox does bulldog.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the whip-snake is not cenobitic is correct.
sent27 & sent18 & sent26 -> int6: the stemmer is weightless.; sent22 & int6 -> int7: the stemmer is ophthalmic.; sent24 & int7 -> int8: the toolbox is piratical but it is not a kind of a sedative-hypnotic.; int8 -> int9: the toolbox is not a sedative-hypnotic.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not a sedative-hypnotic.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the proprietress redeploys Spica and is a perithecium.; int11 -> int12: that the proprietress redeploys Spica is not incorrect.; sent12 -> int13: if the ramipril does not bulldog then it is a kind of a abbess and it does scant.; sent20 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it is dioecious is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the whip-snake is cenobitic. ; $context$ = sent1: the ramipril is not non-ophthalmic. sent2: the ramipril does bulldog. sent3: if the toolbox is a bulldog the fact that the whip-snake is cenobitic is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the ramipril does redeploy gaudy hold if the proprietress is not a squill and it does not redeploy gaudy. sent5: the ramipril redeploys gaudy and it is a abbess if the proprietress is not a bulldog. sent6: if the ramipril redeploys gaudy and it scants then the cottontail does not scants. sent7: if the ramipril does not redeploy Spica and/or it is not a perithecium then it does not redeploy gaudy. sent8: the ramipril does not redeploy Spica and/or is not a perithecium. sent9: the proprietress is a abbess if the ramipril is a squill that does not redeploy gaudy. sent10: if the cottontail does not scant the whip-snake is not cenobitic. sent11: the toolbox does redeploy Spica and does scant if the cottontail is not a squill. sent12: if the fact that something is not a bulldog is not incorrect then it is a kind of a abbess and scants. sent13: the cottontail scants. sent14: if the proprietress is a abbess then the fact that the toolbox is a bulldog is right. sent15: if the ramipril is not a kind of a perithecium then it does not redeploy gaudy. sent16: the proprietress does redeploy Spica and it is a kind of a perithecium if there is something such that it is not a sedative-hypnotic. sent17: the ramipril does not redeploy Spica or it is a perithecium or both. sent18: the stemmer is weightless if the KBO does account. sent19: the toolbox is not a kind of a perithecium. sent20: the thurifer is dioecious. sent21: the ramipril is a squill if the cottontail scants. sent22: if the stemmer is weightless it is not non-ophthalmic. sent23: the proprietress is a perithecium. sent24: if the stemmer is ophthalmic then the toolbox is piratical thing that is not a sedative-hypnotic. sent25: if the fact that the cottontail does scant but it is not a perithecium is correct then the ramipril redeploys gaudy. sent26: if the KBO is weightless then the stemmer is weightless. sent27: either the KBO accounts or it is not weighty or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent13 -> int1: the ramipril is a squill.; sent7 & sent8 -> int2: the ramipril does not redeploy gaudy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ramipril is a squill that does not redeploy gaudy.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the proprietress is a abbess.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the toolbox does bulldog.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__