the giving does not occur.
sent1: that not the State but the reddening Champaign happens does not hold. sent2: that the nonharmonicness and the slowdown occurs does not hold. sent3: that not the slapshot but the angling rhododendron happens does not hold if the lugging happens. sent4: the lugging happens if the fact that the fact that either the angling sixty occurs or the axiologicalness does not occur or both is wrong is right. sent5: the racquetball does not occur if the slapshot happens. sent6: if the getting inconsistency occurs then the azidoness happens. sent7: the fact that the fact that the angling sixty or the non-axiologicalness or both happens hold is false. sent8: the prevention does not occur. sent9: that the angling Microchiroptera happens and the rubriccing does not occur yields the angling diesel-electric. sent10: if the fact that the harmonicness does not occur but the slowdown happens is not correct then the slowdown does not occur. sent11: the observation happens if the Hemingwayesqueness occurs but the getting aficionado does not occur. sent12: the DO does not occur if the getting hellgrammiate does not occur. sent13: the epitaxy happens. sent14: the fact that that the Hemingwayesqueness occurs and the getting aficionado does not occur is not false is caused by that the slowdown does not occur. sent15: that the loosening and the collation occurs does not hold if the imprudentness occurs. sent16: the non-azidoness is brought about by that the getting aficionado and the observation happens. sent17: the biennial does not occur. sent18: that the giving does not occur is prevented by the slapshot. sent19: the realizing does not occur. sent20: that the observation does not occur is triggered by that the azidoness and the giving occurs. sent21: if the fact that the slapshot does not occur but the angling rhododendron occurs is not true the getting inconsistency occurs. sent22: if the evanescing and the currentness occurs then the reintroduction does not occur. sent23: the fact that the tillage does not occur but the vandalism occurs is not right. sent24: the lug occurs or the slapshot occurs or both if the angling rhododendron does not occur. sent25: the confection happens if the transposition and the antibioticness happens. sent26: the Quechuanness occurs. sent27: the observation happens if the Hemingwayesqueness occurs and the getting aficionado occurs.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the lugging happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that not the slapshot but the angling rhododendron occurs is incorrect.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the getting inconsistency occurs.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the azidoness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the giving happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: both the azidoness and the giving happens.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the observation does not occur.; sent10 & sent2 -> int7: the slowdown does not occur.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Hemingwayesqueness occurs and the getting aficionado does not occur is not wrong.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the observation happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the racquetball does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the giving does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the State but the reddening Champaign happens does not hold. sent2: that the nonharmonicness and the slowdown occurs does not hold. sent3: that not the slapshot but the angling rhododendron happens does not hold if the lugging happens. sent4: the lugging happens if the fact that the fact that either the angling sixty occurs or the axiologicalness does not occur or both is wrong is right. sent5: the racquetball does not occur if the slapshot happens. sent6: if the getting inconsistency occurs then the azidoness happens. sent7: the fact that the fact that the angling sixty or the non-axiologicalness or both happens hold is false. sent8: the prevention does not occur. sent9: that the angling Microchiroptera happens and the rubriccing does not occur yields the angling diesel-electric. sent10: if the fact that the harmonicness does not occur but the slowdown happens is not correct then the slowdown does not occur. sent11: the observation happens if the Hemingwayesqueness occurs but the getting aficionado does not occur. sent12: the DO does not occur if the getting hellgrammiate does not occur. sent13: the epitaxy happens. sent14: the fact that that the Hemingwayesqueness occurs and the getting aficionado does not occur is not false is caused by that the slowdown does not occur. sent15: that the loosening and the collation occurs does not hold if the imprudentness occurs. sent16: the non-azidoness is brought about by that the getting aficionado and the observation happens. sent17: the biennial does not occur. sent18: that the giving does not occur is prevented by the slapshot. sent19: the realizing does not occur. sent20: that the observation does not occur is triggered by that the azidoness and the giving occurs. sent21: if the fact that the slapshot does not occur but the angling rhododendron occurs is not true the getting inconsistency occurs. sent22: if the evanescing and the currentness occurs then the reintroduction does not occur. sent23: the fact that the tillage does not occur but the vandalism occurs is not right. sent24: the lug occurs or the slapshot occurs or both if the angling rhododendron does not occur. sent25: the confection happens if the transposition and the antibioticness happens. sent26: the Quechuanness occurs. sent27: the observation happens if the Hemingwayesqueness occurs and the getting aficionado occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the lugging happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that not the slapshot but the angling rhododendron occurs is incorrect.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the getting inconsistency occurs.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the azidoness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the giving happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: both the azidoness and the giving happens.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the observation does not occur.; sent10 & sent2 -> int7: the slowdown does not occur.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Hemingwayesqueness occurs and the getting aficionado does not occur is not wrong.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the observation happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__