the footbridge is a caecilian.
sent1: something is a kind of a caecilian and it is a dimness if it is not a analgesia. sent2: everything does not confuse and/or it is a star. sent3: if that the conchfish is a virus is not false that that the footbridge is not a kind of a analgesia and/or it is a nidus is not true is right. sent4: the footbridge is not a kind of a caecilian if the pied-a-terre does not confuse and/or it stars. sent5: if something is not a kind of a dimness it is not caecilian or it resents glimpse or both. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a analgesia and/or it is a nidus does not hold the wafer is not a dimness. sent7: the conchfish is a virus if the censer is a checkers. sent8: the pied-a-terre is not a kind of a caecilian and/or it confuses. sent9: the conchfish does checker. sent10: something is both a checkers and indispensable if it is not a kind of a gateway. sent11: everything is not a kind of a gateway.
sent2 -> int1: the pied-a-terre does not confuse or stars or both.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the wafer is not a kind of a caecilian and/or does resent glimpse.
sent5 -> int2: if the wafer is not a dimness then it is not a caecilian and/or it resents glimpse.; sent11 -> int3: the pitsaw is not a gateway.; sent10 -> int4: that the pitsaw is both a checkers and indispensable is right if it is not a gateway.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pitsaw is a checkers and it is indispensable.; int5 -> int6: the fact that everything is a checkers that is indispensable is not false.; int6 -> int7: the censer is a kind of a checkers and is indispensable.; int7 -> int8: the censer is a checkers.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the conchfish is a virus.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the footbridge is not a analgesia and/or it is a nidus is wrong.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a analgesia and/or it is a nidus is not right.; sent6 & int11 -> int12: the wafer is not a dimness.; int2 & int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the footbridge is a caecilian. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a caecilian and it is a dimness if it is not a analgesia. sent2: everything does not confuse and/or it is a star. sent3: if that the conchfish is a virus is not false that that the footbridge is not a kind of a analgesia and/or it is a nidus is not true is right. sent4: the footbridge is not a kind of a caecilian if the pied-a-terre does not confuse and/or it stars. sent5: if something is not a kind of a dimness it is not caecilian or it resents glimpse or both. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a analgesia and/or it is a nidus does not hold the wafer is not a dimness. sent7: the conchfish is a virus if the censer is a checkers. sent8: the pied-a-terre is not a kind of a caecilian and/or it confuses. sent9: the conchfish does checker. sent10: something is both a checkers and indispensable if it is not a kind of a gateway. sent11: everything is not a kind of a gateway. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the pied-a-terre does not confuse or stars or both.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__