the penitentiary is irresponsible.
sent1: if something is obstetric then it is responsible. sent2: the fact that something is not an accountant and it is not a transcendentalist is not correct if it is not a nor'-nor'-west. sent3: the icefall is not menopausal if it does not greet Secession and is not intense. sent4: the fact that the rofecoxib is a kind of a microeconomist and it is forceless is false. sent5: the rofecoxib is not a nor'-nor'-west if it does not greet Secession and it is obstetric. sent6: if that the rofecoxib is irresponsible thing that does greet Secession is false then the penitentiary is not a microeconomist. sent7: the fact that the Bighorn is not intense and does not luminesce does not hold if it does not greet Secession. sent8: the Bighorn does not greet Secession if the fact that the rofecoxib is not a microeconomist and is forceless does not hold. sent9: that the rofecoxib is not a kind of a nor'-nor'-west but it is a kind of a microeconomist does not hold. sent10: the icefall is forceless if the rofecoxib is intense. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a nor'-nor'-west the penitentiary is irresponsible. sent12: if the fact that the icefall does not luminesce and is not fistulous is incorrect then the almond is a nor'-nor'-west. sent13: the rofecoxib is non-obstetric. sent14: that the icefall is not intense is not incorrect if the fact that the rofecoxib does not luminesce and is a microeconomist does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the almond does not luminesce but it does greet Secession is not right then the icefall is not a nor'-nor'-west. sent16: that the rofecoxib does not greet Secession but it is menopausal is false if it is not a microeconomist. sent17: the fact that the Bighorn is not fistulous is not incorrect if the fact that the icefall does not greet Secession is not incorrect. sent18: the Bighorn is not menopausal. sent19: that something does not luminesce and is not fistulous is incorrect if it is not menopausal. sent20: the fact that the icefall does not greet Secession and it is not intense is not wrong if the Bighorn does not greet Secession. sent21: the fact that the Bighorn is not responsible but it greets Secession is wrong. sent22: that the icefall does not luminesce and is fistulous is not right if it is not menopausal. sent23: the almond does not luminesce if there is something such that it is a nor'-nor'-west. sent24: the fact that the Bighorn is an adder and it greets Secession does not hold.
sent19 -> int1: if the icefall is not menopausal the fact that it does not luminesce and it is not fistulous is wrong.;
if the rofecoxib is not a nor'-nor'-west that it is not an accountant and it is not a transcendentalist is wrong.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the penitentiary is irresponsible. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is obstetric then it is responsible. sent2: the fact that something is not an accountant and it is not a transcendentalist is not correct if it is not a nor'-nor'-west. sent3: the icefall is not menopausal if it does not greet Secession and is not intense. sent4: the fact that the rofecoxib is a kind of a microeconomist and it is forceless is false. sent5: the rofecoxib is not a nor'-nor'-west if it does not greet Secession and it is obstetric. sent6: if that the rofecoxib is irresponsible thing that does greet Secession is false then the penitentiary is not a microeconomist. sent7: the fact that the Bighorn is not intense and does not luminesce does not hold if it does not greet Secession. sent8: the Bighorn does not greet Secession if the fact that the rofecoxib is not a microeconomist and is forceless does not hold. sent9: that the rofecoxib is not a kind of a nor'-nor'-west but it is a kind of a microeconomist does not hold. sent10: the icefall is forceless if the rofecoxib is intense. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a nor'-nor'-west the penitentiary is irresponsible. sent12: if the fact that the icefall does not luminesce and is not fistulous is incorrect then the almond is a nor'-nor'-west. sent13: the rofecoxib is non-obstetric. sent14: that the icefall is not intense is not incorrect if the fact that the rofecoxib does not luminesce and is a microeconomist does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the almond does not luminesce but it does greet Secession is not right then the icefall is not a nor'-nor'-west. sent16: that the rofecoxib does not greet Secession but it is menopausal is false if it is not a microeconomist. sent17: the fact that the Bighorn is not fistulous is not incorrect if the fact that the icefall does not greet Secession is not incorrect. sent18: the Bighorn is not menopausal. sent19: that something does not luminesce and is not fistulous is incorrect if it is not menopausal. sent20: the fact that the icefall does not greet Secession and it is not intense is not wrong if the Bighorn does not greet Secession. sent21: the fact that the Bighorn is not responsible but it greets Secession is wrong. sent22: that the icefall does not luminesce and is fistulous is not right if it is not menopausal. sent23: the almond does not luminesce if there is something such that it is a nor'-nor'-west. sent24: the fact that the Bighorn is an adder and it greets Secession does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: if the icefall is not menopausal the fact that it does not luminesce and it is not fistulous is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__