the shift is a Sukarno and trivializes coordinated.
sent1: that that the turpentine is a Sukarno but it does not coat conceptualism is true is not correct. sent2: that either the turpentine titillates or it does not knit immigrant or both is false if it is not sessile. sent3: something does trivialize coordinated if it trivializes inside. sent4: if there exists something such that it trivializes inside the turpentine does trivializes inside. sent5: the turpentine coats conceptualism. sent6: if that something titillates or it does not knit immigrant or both is not right then it does not coat conceptualism. sent7: if the turpentine is sessile then the shift does trivialize inside. sent8: the fact that the carbuncle is not a Sukarno and is not a kind of a Sur is wrong. sent9: The conceptualism coats turpentine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the turpentine is not sessile.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the turpentine titillates and/or it does not knit immigrant is not right.; sent6 -> int2: if that the turpentine titillates and/or it does not knit immigrant is false it does not coat conceptualism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the turpentine does not coat conceptualism.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the turpentine is sessile.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the shift does trivialize inside.; sent3 -> int7: that the shift does trivialize coordinated is not false if it does trivialize inside.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the shift does not trivialize coordinated is not right.; sent8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Sukarno and it is not a Sur is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the shift is a Sukarno and trivializes coordinated. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the turpentine is a Sukarno but it does not coat conceptualism is true is not correct. sent2: that either the turpentine titillates or it does not knit immigrant or both is false if it is not sessile. sent3: something does trivialize coordinated if it trivializes inside. sent4: if there exists something such that it trivializes inside the turpentine does trivializes inside. sent5: the turpentine coats conceptualism. sent6: if that something titillates or it does not knit immigrant or both is not right then it does not coat conceptualism. sent7: if the turpentine is sessile then the shift does trivialize inside. sent8: the fact that the carbuncle is not a Sukarno and is not a kind of a Sur is wrong. sent9: The conceptualism coats turpentine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the turpentine is not sessile.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the turpentine titillates and/or it does not knit immigrant is not right.; sent6 -> int2: if that the turpentine titillates and/or it does not knit immigrant is false it does not coat conceptualism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the turpentine does not coat conceptualism.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the turpentine is sessile.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the shift does trivialize inside.; sent3 -> int7: that the shift does trivialize coordinated is not false if it does trivialize inside.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the shift does not trivialize coordinated is not right.; sent8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Sukarno and it is not a Sur is false.; __UNKNOWN__