the cosmologist channels.
sent1: that the larva is not a kind of a tie is not false. sent2: if the waldmeister is iridic then it does not remainder accent. sent3: the fact that the cosmologist is not a kind of a tie is true. sent4: that the waldmeister is a kind of non-freesia thing that does not eulogize airforce is not true. sent5: that if the larva is not a kind of a channels the cosmologist is not vertical is true. sent6: something is not non-vertical if the fact that it is not probabilistic and/or it is not a kind of a mineral is not correct. sent7: if that that the anomaly is not probabilistic and/or it is a tie is right does not hold then it swoops. sent8: that the anomaly is not a swoop and does eulogize ram's-head is not true if the caul is not a swoop. sent9: if something does not remainder accent and it is not probabilistic then it does not eulogize ram's-head. sent10: if something that does not remainder accent is not a tie the fact that it is not vertical is not wrong. sent11: the larva does not remainder accent. sent12: the waldmeister is iridic if that it is not a freesia and does not eulogize airforce is wrong. sent13: either the caul does not eulogize ram's-head or it is not a swoop or both. sent14: The accent does not remainder larva. sent15: if the fact that the snivel does tie and does eulogize ram's-head is not wrong the African does not eulogize ram's-head. sent16: if that the anomaly is not a kind of a swoop but it does eulogize ram's-head is false the cosmologist does channel. sent17: the cosmologist does eulogize ram's-head. sent18: the anomaly is a kind of a vertical. sent19: the anomaly does remainder accent if the larva is not a kind of a swoop. sent20: that the caul is a channels and not vertical does not hold if the anomaly is not a kind of a swoop.
sent6 -> int1: the larva is a kind of a vertical if that it either is not probabilistic or is not a mineral or both is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the larva is not probabilistic and/or it is not a kind of a mineral is not false is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the larva is a vertical.; sent10 -> int3: if the larva does not remainder accent and it does not tie it is not a kind of a vertical.; sent11 & sent1 -> int4: that the larva does not remainder accent and is not a tie is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the larva is non-vertical.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the larva is not probabilistic or it is not mineral or both is not incorrect.;
the cosmologist does not channel.
sent12 & sent4 -> int8: the waldmeister is iridic.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the waldmeister does not remainder accent.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it does not remainder accent.;
$hypothesis$ = the cosmologist channels. ; $context$ = sent1: that the larva is not a kind of a tie is not false. sent2: if the waldmeister is iridic then it does not remainder accent. sent3: the fact that the cosmologist is not a kind of a tie is true. sent4: that the waldmeister is a kind of non-freesia thing that does not eulogize airforce is not true. sent5: that if the larva is not a kind of a channels the cosmologist is not vertical is true. sent6: something is not non-vertical if the fact that it is not probabilistic and/or it is not a kind of a mineral is not correct. sent7: if that that the anomaly is not probabilistic and/or it is a tie is right does not hold then it swoops. sent8: that the anomaly is not a swoop and does eulogize ram's-head is not true if the caul is not a swoop. sent9: if something does not remainder accent and it is not probabilistic then it does not eulogize ram's-head. sent10: if something that does not remainder accent is not a tie the fact that it is not vertical is not wrong. sent11: the larva does not remainder accent. sent12: the waldmeister is iridic if that it is not a freesia and does not eulogize airforce is wrong. sent13: either the caul does not eulogize ram's-head or it is not a swoop or both. sent14: The accent does not remainder larva. sent15: if the fact that the snivel does tie and does eulogize ram's-head is not wrong the African does not eulogize ram's-head. sent16: if that the anomaly is not a kind of a swoop but it does eulogize ram's-head is false the cosmologist does channel. sent17: the cosmologist does eulogize ram's-head. sent18: the anomaly is a kind of a vertical. sent19: the anomaly does remainder accent if the larva is not a kind of a swoop. sent20: that the caul is a channels and not vertical does not hold if the anomaly is not a kind of a swoop. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the larva is a kind of a vertical if that it either is not probabilistic or is not a mineral or both is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the larva is not probabilistic and/or it is not a kind of a mineral is not false is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the larva is a vertical.; sent10 -> int3: if the larva does not remainder accent and it does not tie it is not a kind of a vertical.; sent11 & sent1 -> int4: that the larva does not remainder accent and is not a tie is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the larva is non-vertical.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the larva is not probabilistic or it is not mineral or both is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__