the Palestinian is not a scoutmaster.
sent1: the action is not afferent if the fact that the acylation does neglect coagulant and it is a VLDL is not correct. sent2: the Nightingale is a kind of a scoutmaster. sent3: if that the acylation is a kind of a VLDL that is a kind of a summary does not hold the concrete does not neglect Wordsworth. sent4: the acylation is not a scoutmaster. sent5: the evacuation is a kind of a summary. sent6: the concrete neglects passivity. sent7: The passivity neglects concrete. sent8: if something that does gorge neglects Wordsworth then the Palestinian is not a scoutmaster. sent9: the kapuka is a VLDL. sent10: something does neglect coagulant and it does neglect passivity. sent11: something neglects Wordsworth. sent12: there is something such that it is a gorge. sent13: if something neglects Wordsworth then it is a summary. sent14: the action neglects Wordsworth. sent15: if the concrete does neglect passivity then it is a summary. sent16: if the fact that something is not a scoutmaster and is not afferent is wrong then it is a kind of a scoutmaster. sent17: if the acylation does not neglect coagulant then the action is not an afferent. sent18: if the acylation is incongruous then it is eonian. sent19: the concrete is not pneumonic. sent20: if the acylation is not a gorge that it neglects coagulant and it is a kind of a VLDL is wrong. sent21: the concrete is not a VLDL. sent22: if the action is not an afferent then the concrete is not a summary. sent23: something does neglect Wordsworth if that it is not eonian is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the acylation does not gorge is not false.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the acylation does neglect coagulant and is a kind of a VLDL is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the action is not afferent.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the concrete is not a kind of a summary.; sent15 & sent6 -> int4: the concrete is a summary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the acylation is a kind of a gorge is true.; sent23 -> int7: the acylation does neglect Wordsworth if it is eonian.;
the Palestinian is a scoutmaster.
sent16 -> int8: the Palestinian is a scoutmaster if that it is not a kind of a scoutmaster and it is non-afferent is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the Palestinian is not a scoutmaster. ; $context$ = sent1: the action is not afferent if the fact that the acylation does neglect coagulant and it is a VLDL is not correct. sent2: the Nightingale is a kind of a scoutmaster. sent3: if that the acylation is a kind of a VLDL that is a kind of a summary does not hold the concrete does not neglect Wordsworth. sent4: the acylation is not a scoutmaster. sent5: the evacuation is a kind of a summary. sent6: the concrete neglects passivity. sent7: The passivity neglects concrete. sent8: if something that does gorge neglects Wordsworth then the Palestinian is not a scoutmaster. sent9: the kapuka is a VLDL. sent10: something does neglect coagulant and it does neglect passivity. sent11: something neglects Wordsworth. sent12: there is something such that it is a gorge. sent13: if something neglects Wordsworth then it is a summary. sent14: the action neglects Wordsworth. sent15: if the concrete does neglect passivity then it is a summary. sent16: if the fact that something is not a scoutmaster and is not afferent is wrong then it is a kind of a scoutmaster. sent17: if the acylation does not neglect coagulant then the action is not an afferent. sent18: if the acylation is incongruous then it is eonian. sent19: the concrete is not pneumonic. sent20: if the acylation is not a gorge that it neglects coagulant and it is a kind of a VLDL is wrong. sent21: the concrete is not a VLDL. sent22: if the action is not an afferent then the concrete is not a summary. sent23: something does neglect Wordsworth if that it is not eonian is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the acylation does not gorge is not false.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the acylation does neglect coagulant and is a kind of a VLDL is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the action is not afferent.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the concrete is not a kind of a summary.; sent15 & sent6 -> int4: the concrete is a summary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the acylation is a kind of a gorge is true.; sent23 -> int7: the acylation does neglect Wordsworth if it is eonian.; __UNKNOWN__