that the proteinaceousness happens is triggered by that the operculateness occurs.
sent1: if the resecting meadowgrass occurs the proteinaceousness happens. sent2: the resecting meadowgrass occurs if the fact that the phonemicness occurs but the refraction does not occur is not right. sent3: the fact that the mayoralness but not the flutter happens does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the resecting buteonine happens and the once-over does not occur is not true then the thoughtfulness occurs. sent5: if the operculateness happens then the fact that the phonemicness occurs but the refraction does not occur is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the operculateness occurs hold.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the phonemicness happens and the refraction does not occur is wrong.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the resecting meadowgrass happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the proteinaceousness occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the proteinaceousness happens is triggered by that the operculateness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the resecting meadowgrass occurs the proteinaceousness happens. sent2: the resecting meadowgrass occurs if the fact that the phonemicness occurs but the refraction does not occur is not right. sent3: the fact that the mayoralness but not the flutter happens does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the resecting buteonine happens and the once-over does not occur is not true then the thoughtfulness occurs. sent5: if the operculateness happens then the fact that the phonemicness occurs but the refraction does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the operculateness occurs hold.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the phonemicness happens and the refraction does not occur is wrong.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the resecting meadowgrass happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the proteinaceousness occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__