the troublemaker is not brahminic.
sent1: if the material squishes captopril the fact that the captopril does repot checkerbloom is not wrong. sent2: if that the material is not a eparchy is not incorrect the checkerbloom is lymphocytic. sent3: if something is a eparchy and/or it repots blowout the troublemaker is non-brahminic. sent4: the checkerbloom is a eparchy if the captopril repots checkerbloom. sent5: the checkerbloom repots blowout and/or does not squish captopril. sent6: the checkerbloom does not repot blowout if it does not repot blowout and/or is not a Cousteau. sent7: the troublemaker is brahminic if the material does squish captopril. sent8: if that the material is not a kind of a eparchy but it does repot checkerbloom does not hold it squishes captopril. sent9: something that does not repot checkerbloom is a kind of lymphocytic thing that squishes captopril. sent10: if something is not a kind of a Cousteau the fact that it is not a eparchy and it repots blowout is incorrect. sent11: if the material is not lymphocytic then the captopril does repot checkerbloom. sent12: something is a eparchy or it does repot checkerbloom or both. sent13: if there exists something such that it either is a eparchy or does repot blowout or both then the checkerbloom is not brahminic. sent14: the troublemaker is not brahminic if something does repot blowout. sent15: if the material is lymphocytic then the troublemaker squishes captopril. sent16: the checkerbloom squishes captopril and/or it does not repot blowout. sent17: if the fact that something does not squish captopril but it is lymphocytic does not hold then it is brahminic.
the troublemaker is brahminic.
sent17 -> int1: the troublemaker is brahminic if the fact that it does not squish captopril and it is lymphocytic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the troublemaker is not brahminic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the material squishes captopril the fact that the captopril does repot checkerbloom is not wrong. sent2: if that the material is not a eparchy is not incorrect the checkerbloom is lymphocytic. sent3: if something is a eparchy and/or it repots blowout the troublemaker is non-brahminic. sent4: the checkerbloom is a eparchy if the captopril repots checkerbloom. sent5: the checkerbloom repots blowout and/or does not squish captopril. sent6: the checkerbloom does not repot blowout if it does not repot blowout and/or is not a Cousteau. sent7: the troublemaker is brahminic if the material does squish captopril. sent8: if that the material is not a kind of a eparchy but it does repot checkerbloom does not hold it squishes captopril. sent9: something that does not repot checkerbloom is a kind of lymphocytic thing that squishes captopril. sent10: if something is not a kind of a Cousteau the fact that it is not a eparchy and it repots blowout is incorrect. sent11: if the material is not lymphocytic then the captopril does repot checkerbloom. sent12: something is a eparchy or it does repot checkerbloom or both. sent13: if there exists something such that it either is a eparchy or does repot blowout or both then the checkerbloom is not brahminic. sent14: the troublemaker is not brahminic if something does repot blowout. sent15: if the material is lymphocytic then the troublemaker squishes captopril. sent16: the checkerbloom squishes captopril and/or it does not repot blowout. sent17: if the fact that something does not squish captopril but it is lymphocytic does not hold then it is brahminic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__