the part does not concrete but it inhales if the WMD does issue.
sent1: if the WMD issues the fact that it is not aquicultural and is tasteful is not true. sent2: if that something is non-aquicultural thing that is tasteful is not correct then the fact that it does not inhale is not incorrect. sent3: that the part is not a concrete but it does inhale is not false if the WMD does not inhale.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the WMD issues.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the WMD is a kind of non-aquicultural thing that is tasteful does not hold.; sent2 -> int2: if that the WMD is both non-aquicultural and tasteful is wrong it does not inhale.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the WMD does not inhale.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the part is not a kind of a concrete and does inhale is not false.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the part does not concrete but it inhales if the WMD does issue. ; $context$ = sent1: if the WMD issues the fact that it is not aquicultural and is tasteful is not true. sent2: if that something is non-aquicultural thing that is tasteful is not correct then the fact that it does not inhale is not incorrect. sent3: that the part is not a concrete but it does inhale is not false if the WMD does not inhale. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the WMD issues.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the WMD is a kind of non-aquicultural thing that is tasteful does not hold.; sent2 -> int2: if that the WMD is both non-aquicultural and tasteful is wrong it does not inhale.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the WMD does not inhale.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the part is not a kind of a concrete and does inhale is not false.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__