the immortelle does not utter coronilla or it is not pharmacological or both.
sent1: the immortelle does not utter coronilla or it contends or both. sent2: the fact that the samite waterproofs is right. sent3: the blastocyst is not a savin and/or is a waterproofing. sent4: the blastocyst is a Worcestershire but it does not contend if it is non-comic. sent5: the samite is not a waterproofing and/or it is lithic if it is not comic. sent6: the immortelle does utter coronilla or it is not lithic or both if it is not pharmacological. sent7: the blastocyst is a waterproofing but it does not contend. sent8: the samite does not utter coronilla. sent9: either the blastocyst is a crook or it is not pharmacological or both. sent10: the blastocyst is non-comic if something falsifies tarragon or it is not lithic or both. sent11: the blastocyst is a sirloin and is a Euphagus. sent12: the blastocyst is not a Mbundu. sent13: if something does not waterproof it does not utter coronilla and/or it is not pharmacological. sent14: the blastocyst is a kind of an indicative and is not a kind of a invigilation if it does not date samite. sent15: the samite is not lithic or it is a savin or both. sent16: either the blastocyst is non-pharmacological or it is a Euphagus or both if it is not a sirloin. sent17: the immortelle is not a kind of a waterproofing if that the samite falsifies tarragon or it is not lithic or both is incorrect. sent18: the samite is a Euphagus but it does not falsify tarragon if it does not utter coronilla. sent19: the immortelle is pharmacological but it is not a savin. sent20: if the samite is not a savin then it is not honorable. sent21: if the immortelle does not falsify tarragon then it is pharmacological or is not a Worcestershire or both. sent22: something does not contend or it is not a savin or both if it is not a kind of a Worcestershire. sent23: if the blastocyst is a Worcestershire and does not contend then it is a kind of a savin. sent24: the samite is lithic and/or it is not comic if it is not a sirloin.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the samite does falsify tarragon or it is not lithic or both.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it either falsifies tarragon or is not lithic or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the blastocyst is not comic.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the blastocyst is a Worcestershire and does not contend.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the blastocyst is a savin.; sent11 -> int5: the blastocyst is a sirloin.; sent13 -> int6: the immortelle does not utter coronilla or it is not pharmacological or both if it is not a kind of a waterproofing.;
$hypothesis$ = the immortelle does not utter coronilla or it is not pharmacological or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the immortelle does not utter coronilla or it contends or both. sent2: the fact that the samite waterproofs is right. sent3: the blastocyst is not a savin and/or is a waterproofing. sent4: the blastocyst is a Worcestershire but it does not contend if it is non-comic. sent5: the samite is not a waterproofing and/or it is lithic if it is not comic. sent6: the immortelle does utter coronilla or it is not lithic or both if it is not pharmacological. sent7: the blastocyst is a waterproofing but it does not contend. sent8: the samite does not utter coronilla. sent9: either the blastocyst is a crook or it is not pharmacological or both. sent10: the blastocyst is non-comic if something falsifies tarragon or it is not lithic or both. sent11: the blastocyst is a sirloin and is a Euphagus. sent12: the blastocyst is not a Mbundu. sent13: if something does not waterproof it does not utter coronilla and/or it is not pharmacological. sent14: the blastocyst is a kind of an indicative and is not a kind of a invigilation if it does not date samite. sent15: the samite is not lithic or it is a savin or both. sent16: either the blastocyst is non-pharmacological or it is a Euphagus or both if it is not a sirloin. sent17: the immortelle is not a kind of a waterproofing if that the samite falsifies tarragon or it is not lithic or both is incorrect. sent18: the samite is a Euphagus but it does not falsify tarragon if it does not utter coronilla. sent19: the immortelle is pharmacological but it is not a savin. sent20: if the samite is not a savin then it is not honorable. sent21: if the immortelle does not falsify tarragon then it is pharmacological or is not a Worcestershire or both. sent22: something does not contend or it is not a savin or both if it is not a kind of a Worcestershire. sent23: if the blastocyst is a Worcestershire and does not contend then it is a kind of a savin. sent24: the samite is lithic and/or it is not comic if it is not a sirloin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the samite does falsify tarragon or it is not lithic or both.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it either falsifies tarragon or is not lithic or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the blastocyst is not comic.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the blastocyst is a Worcestershire and does not contend.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the blastocyst is a savin.; sent11 -> int5: the blastocyst is a sirloin.; sent13 -> int6: the immortelle does not utter coronilla or it is not pharmacological or both if it is not a kind of a waterproofing.; __UNKNOWN__