if the apse belongs that the consumer is not stored-program but a secobarbital is wrong.
sent1: the apse is not a secobarbital but it is a hogback. sent2: if something is stored-program then it is not a draw but a hogback. sent3: something is oneiric and is sigmoid. sent4: the duckpin is not corymbose but it is a bestowal. sent5: something is auscultatory. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that it is not a draw is not incorrect. sent7: something is non-auscultatory a secobarbital if it is stored-program. sent8: the Cheviot is a secobarbital. sent9: if there is something such that it is not auscultatory the fact that the consumer is non-stored-program thing that is a secobarbital is incorrect. sent10: if the apse does belong it is a hogback. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a secobarbital is not false. sent12: that the duckpin is not a hogback and is not non-auscultatory is not right if the apse is a draw. sent13: the duckpin is non-auscultatory if something that is not a draw is a kind of a hogback. sent14: the plasticizer is a kind of a secobarbital. sent15: something is a draw and is a hogback. sent16: the consumer is not stored-program but it is a kind of a secobarbital if there is something such that it is not auscultatory. sent17: the apse is a hogback. sent18: the apse is not a secobarbital if there is something such that it is a kind of non-stored-program a hogback. sent19: there exists something such that it is a hogback.
$hypothesis$ = if the apse belongs that the consumer is not stored-program but a secobarbital is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the apse is not a secobarbital but it is a hogback. sent2: if something is stored-program then it is not a draw but a hogback. sent3: something is oneiric and is sigmoid. sent4: the duckpin is not corymbose but it is a bestowal. sent5: something is auscultatory. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that it is not a draw is not incorrect. sent7: something is non-auscultatory a secobarbital if it is stored-program. sent8: the Cheviot is a secobarbital. sent9: if there is something such that it is not auscultatory the fact that the consumer is non-stored-program thing that is a secobarbital is incorrect. sent10: if the apse does belong it is a hogback. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a secobarbital is not false. sent12: that the duckpin is not a hogback and is not non-auscultatory is not right if the apse is a draw. sent13: the duckpin is non-auscultatory if something that is not a draw is a kind of a hogback. sent14: the plasticizer is a kind of a secobarbital. sent15: something is a draw and is a hogback. sent16: the consumer is not stored-program but it is a kind of a secobarbital if there is something such that it is not auscultatory. sent17: the apse is a hogback. sent18: the apse is not a secobarbital if there is something such that it is a kind of non-stored-program a hogback. sent19: there exists something such that it is a hogback. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__