the fact that the arame is not a waterfall and/or it is not intertribal is false.
sent1: something does not justify if it does not tame and it tribulates alibi. sent2: the isolation does justify. sent3: the bourtree does announce pay-phone and it tribulates Tianjin. sent4: the fact that the hone is a simpleton and does tribulate alibi is incorrect if the isolation is not a simpleton. sent5: if that the isolation is not a simpleton is not false then it does not announce pay-phone. sent6: the isolation does not justify if it does not announce pay-phone. sent7: if the fact that something is not tame and not a simpleton is wrong then it is a simpleton. sent8: if the fact that the bourtree does not tribulate alibi is true then that that the hone tribulate alibi or it does tame or both is not correct is not incorrect. sent9: the destination is not intertribal. sent10: if the isolation does not tribulate alibi and justifies the arame does not justifies. sent11: the arame does not announce pay-phone if the fact that the Treasury is a waterfall is right. sent12: that something is a kind of non-tame thing that is not a simpleton is false if it announces pay-phone. sent13: if the trader does not announce pay-phone that the Treasury does announce pay-phone and does tribulate Tianjin is wrong. sent14: if that something does announce pay-phone and does tribulate Tianjin is not true it is not a kind of a lupine. sent15: if the fact that the isolation either is a simpleton or justifies or both is correct then the bourtree does not tribulate alibi. sent16: the fact that the arame is non-intertribal and/or it is not a simpleton is not right. sent17: if the fact that something is lupine and it tames is not true then it does not tribulate alibi. sent18: that the arame is not a kind of a waterfall or it is not intertribal or both is false if the Treasury is not a lupine. sent19: if that either the hone does tribulate alibi or it does tame or both is not correct the trader does not announce pay-phone.
sent2 -> int1: either the isolation is a simpleton or it justifies or both.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the bourtree does not tribulate alibi.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that either the hone does tribulate alibi or it does tame or both is false.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the trader does not announce pay-phone.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the Treasury announces pay-phone and it tribulates Tianjin is false.; sent14 -> int6: the Treasury is non-lupine if that it does announce pay-phone and it tribulates Tianjin is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Treasury is not a lupine.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the arame does not justify.
sent7 -> int8: if the fact that the isolation is non-tame thing that is not a simpleton does not hold then it is a kind of a simpleton.; sent12 -> int9: the fact that the isolation is not tame and it is not a simpleton is false if it announces pay-phone.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the arame is not a waterfall and/or it is not intertribal is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not justify if it does not tame and it tribulates alibi. sent2: the isolation does justify. sent3: the bourtree does announce pay-phone and it tribulates Tianjin. sent4: the fact that the hone is a simpleton and does tribulate alibi is incorrect if the isolation is not a simpleton. sent5: if that the isolation is not a simpleton is not false then it does not announce pay-phone. sent6: the isolation does not justify if it does not announce pay-phone. sent7: if the fact that something is not tame and not a simpleton is wrong then it is a simpleton. sent8: if the fact that the bourtree does not tribulate alibi is true then that that the hone tribulate alibi or it does tame or both is not correct is not incorrect. sent9: the destination is not intertribal. sent10: if the isolation does not tribulate alibi and justifies the arame does not justifies. sent11: the arame does not announce pay-phone if the fact that the Treasury is a waterfall is right. sent12: that something is a kind of non-tame thing that is not a simpleton is false if it announces pay-phone. sent13: if the trader does not announce pay-phone that the Treasury does announce pay-phone and does tribulate Tianjin is wrong. sent14: if that something does announce pay-phone and does tribulate Tianjin is not true it is not a kind of a lupine. sent15: if the fact that the isolation either is a simpleton or justifies or both is correct then the bourtree does not tribulate alibi. sent16: the fact that the arame is non-intertribal and/or it is not a simpleton is not right. sent17: if the fact that something is lupine and it tames is not true then it does not tribulate alibi. sent18: that the arame is not a kind of a waterfall or it is not intertribal or both is false if the Treasury is not a lupine. sent19: if that either the hone does tribulate alibi or it does tame or both is not correct the trader does not announce pay-phone. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: either the isolation is a simpleton or it justifies or both.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the bourtree does not tribulate alibi.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that either the hone does tribulate alibi or it does tame or both is false.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the trader does not announce pay-phone.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the Treasury announces pay-phone and it tribulates Tianjin is false.; sent14 -> int6: the Treasury is non-lupine if that it does announce pay-phone and it tribulates Tianjin is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Treasury is not a lupine.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__