that there is something such that if it is a augury that it is inoperable and it does not hesitate is wrong does not hold.
sent1: if something sermonizes letterpress the fact that it is a basidiospore and it does not reject does not hold. sent2: if something is a augury then that it is a kind of inoperable thing that does hesitate is not true. sent3: the fact that the coronet is inoperable and it does hesitate is not true if it is a augury. sent4: that something is a demantoid and does not stretch malice is incorrect if it is a crying. sent5: that something morphs but it does not cloister smudge is not correct if it is a Ramanavami. sent6: the fact that something is nectar-rich but it does not irrigate is false if it is a kind of a black. sent7: the fact that something is a Nuytsia but it does not cloister ague does not hold if it cloisters canebrake. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is a augury is not wrong then it is inoperable and it does not hesitate. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a impishness then that it is a kind of a spectrometer and it is not a kind of a alpha-naphthol is not true hold. sent10: that the fact that something is a kind of a Occidentalism that is not steadied is not wrong is false if it is a crying. sent11: the coronet is inoperable and does not hesitate if it is a augury. sent12: there is something such that if it is concentric that it is both a distributary and not a demantoid is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a augury the fact that it is inoperable and does hesitate does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it does sermonize jimmies then the fact that it is photochemical and it is not successful is false. sent15: if something is a augury then the fact that it is inoperable thing that does not hesitate does not hold. sent16: if the coronet hesitates then the fact that it is both alular and impure is false. sent17: there is something such that if it is a kind of a flutist then the fact that it is a kind of asleep thing that is not a baster is not true. sent18: something is inoperable thing that does not hesitate if it is a augury.
sent15 -> int1: if the coronet is a augury the fact that it is inoperable and it does not hesitate does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a augury that it is inoperable and it does not hesitate is wrong does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something sermonizes letterpress the fact that it is a basidiospore and it does not reject does not hold. sent2: if something is a augury then that it is a kind of inoperable thing that does hesitate is not true. sent3: the fact that the coronet is inoperable and it does hesitate is not true if it is a augury. sent4: that something is a demantoid and does not stretch malice is incorrect if it is a crying. sent5: that something morphs but it does not cloister smudge is not correct if it is a Ramanavami. sent6: the fact that something is nectar-rich but it does not irrigate is false if it is a kind of a black. sent7: the fact that something is a Nuytsia but it does not cloister ague does not hold if it cloisters canebrake. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is a augury is not wrong then it is inoperable and it does not hesitate. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a impishness then that it is a kind of a spectrometer and it is not a kind of a alpha-naphthol is not true hold. sent10: that the fact that something is a kind of a Occidentalism that is not steadied is not wrong is false if it is a crying. sent11: the coronet is inoperable and does not hesitate if it is a augury. sent12: there is something such that if it is concentric that it is both a distributary and not a demantoid is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a augury the fact that it is inoperable and does hesitate does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it does sermonize jimmies then the fact that it is photochemical and it is not successful is false. sent15: if something is a augury then the fact that it is inoperable thing that does not hesitate does not hold. sent16: if the coronet hesitates then the fact that it is both alular and impure is false. sent17: there is something such that if it is a kind of a flutist then the fact that it is a kind of asleep thing that is not a baster is not true. sent18: something is inoperable thing that does not hesitate if it is a augury. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if the coronet is a augury the fact that it is inoperable and it does not hesitate does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__