the waterpower is not a kind of a osteopathy but it is a iteration.
sent1: the Ingrian rambles Gesner. sent2: the fact that the fact that something is not a osteopathy and is a iteration hold is not right if it is exergonic. sent3: if something is non-exergonic it is not a osteopathy. sent4: if the fact that the waterpower is inequitable is not false then it is not a iteration. sent5: the fact that that the mailsorter is equitable is not false if the Ingrian is not equitable hold. sent6: the waterpower is not a osteopathy. sent7: if the prison is not a osteopathy then the waterpower is not a osteopathy. sent8: the Ingrian hazes but it is not a kind of a boxer. sent9: the Ingrian is not a boxer. sent10: if the mailsorter is a iteration that does haze the waterpower is not equitable. sent11: if the waterpower is equitable and it is a iteration the prison is not exergonic. sent12: the Ingrian is not equitable if it does haze and is a boxer. sent13: something is not a haze and is not a kind of a boxer if it is a kind of a pyrrhic. sent14: if something is not equitable it is exergonic and it is not unenthusiastic. sent15: the mailsorter is not equitable if the prison is a kind of exergonic thing that is unenthusiastic. sent16: the mailsorter either rambles mailsorter or is a pyrrhic or both if it does not axe movability. sent17: if the Ingrian rambles Gesner then it does not ramble Hohenlinden and does ramble fritillary. sent18: the waterpower is exergonic if the prison is exergonic and is not unenthusiastic. sent19: the prison is not enthusiastic. sent20: the fact that the mailsorter does not axe movability hold if the Ingrian does not ramble Hohenlinden but it does ramble fritillary. sent21: if the prison is not a osteopathy then the waterpower is not a osteopathy but a iteration.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prison is exergonic.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: the prison is exergonic thing that is unenthusiastic.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the mailsorter is not equitable.; sent3 -> int3: the prison is not a osteopathy if it is not exergonic.;
the fact that the waterpower is not a osteopathy but it is a iteration is incorrect.
sent2 -> int4: if the waterpower is exergonic then that it is not a osteopathy but a iteration is incorrect.; sent14 -> int5: if the prison is not equitable it is both exergonic and not unenthusiastic.; sent13 -> int6: if the prison is a kind of a pyrrhic then it is not a haze and is not a boxer.; sent17 & sent1 -> int7: the Ingrian does not ramble Hohenlinden and rambles fritillary.; sent20 & int7 -> int8: the mailsorter does not axe movability.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: the mailsorter rambles mailsorter or it is a pyrrhic or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the waterpower is not a kind of a osteopathy but it is a iteration. ; $context$ = sent1: the Ingrian rambles Gesner. sent2: the fact that the fact that something is not a osteopathy and is a iteration hold is not right if it is exergonic. sent3: if something is non-exergonic it is not a osteopathy. sent4: if the fact that the waterpower is inequitable is not false then it is not a iteration. sent5: the fact that that the mailsorter is equitable is not false if the Ingrian is not equitable hold. sent6: the waterpower is not a osteopathy. sent7: if the prison is not a osteopathy then the waterpower is not a osteopathy. sent8: the Ingrian hazes but it is not a kind of a boxer. sent9: the Ingrian is not a boxer. sent10: if the mailsorter is a iteration that does haze the waterpower is not equitable. sent11: if the waterpower is equitable and it is a iteration the prison is not exergonic. sent12: the Ingrian is not equitable if it does haze and is a boxer. sent13: something is not a haze and is not a kind of a boxer if it is a kind of a pyrrhic. sent14: if something is not equitable it is exergonic and it is not unenthusiastic. sent15: the mailsorter is not equitable if the prison is a kind of exergonic thing that is unenthusiastic. sent16: the mailsorter either rambles mailsorter or is a pyrrhic or both if it does not axe movability. sent17: if the Ingrian rambles Gesner then it does not ramble Hohenlinden and does ramble fritillary. sent18: the waterpower is exergonic if the prison is exergonic and is not unenthusiastic. sent19: the prison is not enthusiastic. sent20: the fact that the mailsorter does not axe movability hold if the Ingrian does not ramble Hohenlinden but it does ramble fritillary. sent21: if the prison is not a osteopathy then the waterpower is not a osteopathy but a iteration. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prison is exergonic.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: the prison is exergonic thing that is unenthusiastic.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the mailsorter is not equitable.; sent3 -> int3: the prison is not a osteopathy if it is not exergonic.; __UNKNOWN__