the argent does not demise ambiance.
sent1: the argent is carpellate. sent2: if the argent is isthmian then the fact that it does resurrect is not incorrect. sent3: the blower is centralist. sent4: the celecoxib does resurrect. sent5: the shipping demises ambiance. sent6: if the argent is centralist it does demise ambiance. sent7: that the argent does stampede melanoblast is correct if it is monotonic. sent8: if the argent is a naumachy it is centralist. sent9: the argent is centralist if it does quench simony. sent10: if the corporal resurrects then that the fluoroform resurrects is not incorrect. sent11: the stringybark is centralist if it is advisable. sent12: if the argent resurrects it is a naumachy. sent13: the argent is a Manama. sent14: if the shower does demise ambiance then that it is loud is correct. sent15: the banana is a naumachy. sent16: if the affiliate does quench alpaca then it is a kind of a naumachy. sent17: the argent does shirk if it does quench bar. sent18: the argent resurrects.
sent12 & sent18 -> int1: the argent is a kind of a naumachy.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the argent is centralist.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the argent does not demise ambiance.
$hypothesis$ = the argent does not demise ambiance. ; $context$ = sent1: the argent is carpellate. sent2: if the argent is isthmian then the fact that it does resurrect is not incorrect. sent3: the blower is centralist. sent4: the celecoxib does resurrect. sent5: the shipping demises ambiance. sent6: if the argent is centralist it does demise ambiance. sent7: that the argent does stampede melanoblast is correct if it is monotonic. sent8: if the argent is a naumachy it is centralist. sent9: the argent is centralist if it does quench simony. sent10: if the corporal resurrects then that the fluoroform resurrects is not incorrect. sent11: the stringybark is centralist if it is advisable. sent12: if the argent resurrects it is a naumachy. sent13: the argent is a Manama. sent14: if the shower does demise ambiance then that it is loud is correct. sent15: the banana is a naumachy. sent16: if the affiliate does quench alpaca then it is a kind of a naumachy. sent17: the argent does shirk if it does quench bar. sent18: the argent resurrects. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent18 -> int1: the argent is a kind of a naumachy.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the argent is centralist.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__