the riveting indecency does not occur if the breakable happens.
sent1: if the rush does not occur the clonalness occurs and the surgicalness does not occur. sent2: the atomisticness occurs. sent3: that the breakableness occurs brings about the riveting indecency. sent4: the riveting indecency happens. sent5: if that both the populating jackstraw and the breakable occurs is not false then the riveting indecency does not occur. sent6: that the abundantness does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: that the casting expressed does not occur is brought about by that the shallow-draftness occurs. sent8: the unbreakableness triggers that the immunologicalness occurs and the populating jackstraw happens. sent9: the enthusing occurs. sent10: that the populating jackstraw and the breakableness occurs brings about that the riveting indecency happens. sent11: if the surgicalness does not occur then the riveting indecency and the hanging happens.
the immunologicalness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the riveting indecency does not occur if the breakable happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rush does not occur the clonalness occurs and the surgicalness does not occur. sent2: the atomisticness occurs. sent3: that the breakableness occurs brings about the riveting indecency. sent4: the riveting indecency happens. sent5: if that both the populating jackstraw and the breakable occurs is not false then the riveting indecency does not occur. sent6: that the abundantness does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: that the casting expressed does not occur is brought about by that the shallow-draftness occurs. sent8: the unbreakableness triggers that the immunologicalness occurs and the populating jackstraw happens. sent9: the enthusing occurs. sent10: that the populating jackstraw and the breakableness occurs brings about that the riveting indecency happens. sent11: if the surgicalness does not occur then the riveting indecency and the hanging happens. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__