if the fritillary is not antennal the fact that the headshot does stumble isomerism but it is non-internal is not true.
sent1: the fritillary is non-antennal but it does stumble isomerism. sent2: the fact that the headshot is a kind of a Galilean and it is internal is not right. sent3: if the Cambrian is not a Galilean it does not count exhausting. sent4: the canape is not homiletic if that the paddle-wheeler is homiletic and it is a sericulturist does not hold. sent5: if the canape is not a enteron but it is a sericulturist the paddle-wheeler is not a Galilean. sent6: if there are non-antennal things the canape is not a enteron and is a sericulturist. sent7: if the fritillary is not antennal then that the headshot stumbles isomerism and it is internal is false. sent8: if the Cambrian does not count exhausting the antitussive is not protective. sent9: that that the Cambrian is both not a wheelchair and a Galilean is not right hold if the fact that the paddle-wheeler is not a kind of a Galilean is not wrong. sent10: if the fact that something is not a wheelchair and is a kind of a Galilean is not correct it does not count exhausting. sent11: if the antitussive is not protective the fact that the headshot does stumble isomerism but it is not internal is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fritillary is not antennal.; assump1 -> int1: something is not antennal.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the canape is not a kind of a enteron and is a sericulturist.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the paddle-wheeler is not a kind of a Galilean.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: that the Cambrian is not a wheelchair and is a kind of a Galilean is false.; sent10 -> int5: if the fact that the Cambrian is not a wheelchair but a Galilean does not hold then it does not count exhausting.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Cambrian does not count exhausting.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the antitussive is not protective.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that the headshot does stumble isomerism but it is not internal does not hold.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it is not homiletic.
$hypothesis$ = if the fritillary is not antennal the fact that the headshot does stumble isomerism but it is non-internal is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fritillary is non-antennal but it does stumble isomerism. sent2: the fact that the headshot is a kind of a Galilean and it is internal is not right. sent3: if the Cambrian is not a Galilean it does not count exhausting. sent4: the canape is not homiletic if that the paddle-wheeler is homiletic and it is a sericulturist does not hold. sent5: if the canape is not a enteron but it is a sericulturist the paddle-wheeler is not a Galilean. sent6: if there are non-antennal things the canape is not a enteron and is a sericulturist. sent7: if the fritillary is not antennal then that the headshot stumbles isomerism and it is internal is false. sent8: if the Cambrian does not count exhausting the antitussive is not protective. sent9: that that the Cambrian is both not a wheelchair and a Galilean is not right hold if the fact that the paddle-wheeler is not a kind of a Galilean is not wrong. sent10: if the fact that something is not a wheelchair and is a kind of a Galilean is not correct it does not count exhausting. sent11: if the antitussive is not protective the fact that the headshot does stumble isomerism but it is not internal is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fritillary is not antennal.; assump1 -> int1: something is not antennal.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the canape is not a kind of a enteron and is a sericulturist.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the paddle-wheeler is not a kind of a Galilean.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: that the Cambrian is not a wheelchair and is a kind of a Galilean is false.; sent10 -> int5: if the fact that the Cambrian is not a wheelchair but a Galilean does not hold then it does not count exhausting.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Cambrian does not count exhausting.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the antitussive is not protective.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that the headshot does stumble isomerism but it is not internal does not hold.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__