the picnicker does risk mark.
sent1: The beluga does not stable beluga. sent2: if the beluga does not stable beluga then it is not hydropathic. sent3: the fact that the picnicker does not twinkle but it is hydropathic is incorrect if the beluga is not hydropathic. sent4: the beluga does not stable beluga. sent5: something is not a Cocteau and is a shaman if it does chute. sent6: if the fact that the picnicker is not a kind of a twinkle and is hydropathic does not hold the fact that it does risk mark is not wrong. sent7: the punk commands Bangladeshi and is a twinkle if it is not a Cocteau. sent8: that the punk does chute is not incorrect. sent9: that the beluga does risk mark and it stables beluga does not hold if there is something such that it is not hydropathic. sent10: that the picnicker does not stable beluga is not false if it is not a twinkle. sent11: if there is something such that it does command Bangladeshi and is a kind of a twinkle the tremor is not hydropathic.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the beluga is not hydropathic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the picnicker is both not a twinkle and hydropathic is not correct.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the picnicker does not risk mark.
sent5 -> int3: if the punk chutes it is not a Cocteau and it is a shaman.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the punk is not a Cocteau but it is a shaman.; int4 -> int5: the punk is not a Cocteau.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the punk commands Bangladeshi and is a twinkle.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it commands Bangladeshi and it twinkles.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the tremor is not hydropathic.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is non-hydropathic hold.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the fact that the fact that the beluga risks mark and it does stable beluga is correct does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it does risk mark and it does stable beluga does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the picnicker does risk mark. ; $context$ = sent1: The beluga does not stable beluga. sent2: if the beluga does not stable beluga then it is not hydropathic. sent3: the fact that the picnicker does not twinkle but it is hydropathic is incorrect if the beluga is not hydropathic. sent4: the beluga does not stable beluga. sent5: something is not a Cocteau and is a shaman if it does chute. sent6: if the fact that the picnicker is not a kind of a twinkle and is hydropathic does not hold the fact that it does risk mark is not wrong. sent7: the punk commands Bangladeshi and is a twinkle if it is not a Cocteau. sent8: that the punk does chute is not incorrect. sent9: that the beluga does risk mark and it stables beluga does not hold if there is something such that it is not hydropathic. sent10: that the picnicker does not stable beluga is not false if it is not a twinkle. sent11: if there is something such that it does command Bangladeshi and is a kind of a twinkle the tremor is not hydropathic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the beluga is not hydropathic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the picnicker is both not a twinkle and hydropathic is not correct.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__