the fact that the inexactness does not occur and the incidence occurs is wrong.
sent1: that both the evenness and the fossiliferousness occurs is brought about by that the Latinness does not occur. sent2: the juridicalness does not occur. sent3: if that the puritanicalness does not occur hold then that the pachisi and the inexactness happens is not incorrect. sent4: the facultativeness is prevented by that the inexactness and the puritanicalness happens. sent5: if the waggery does not occur then the unzipping does not occur or the virginalness does not occur or both. sent6: that not the inexactness but the incidence happens is incorrect if the puritanicalness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the fissileness and the Gothic occurs does not hold if the undertaking does not occur. sent8: the crucifixion and the numbering occurs. sent9: not the planetalness but the droning Faisalabad happens if the contributing formalwear does not occur. sent10: if that the laxness happens and the waggery happens is not true then the fact that the waggery does not occur hold. sent11: both the facultativeness and the extravagance occurs. sent12: the incidence occurs and the inessentialness happens. sent13: if the fact that the extinguishing sousaphone and the extravagance occurs does not hold the extravagance does not occur. sent14: either that the extinguishing theophany occurs or that the unpopularness does not occur or both is triggered by the evenness. sent15: if the planetalness does not occur then that that the actinometry does not occur and the trabecularness happens is not correct hold. sent16: that the extinguishing sousaphone happens and the extravagance occurs does not hold if the trabecularness does not occur. sent17: the inessentialness happens. sent18: the baa occurs. sent19: the possible happens. sent20: if the extravagance does not occur then the fact that the inessential happens but the facultativeness does not occur is wrong. sent21: the trabecularness does not occur if that the actinometry does not occur but the trabecularness happens is not right. sent22: that the unzipping does not occur and/or that the virginalness does not occur triggers the non-Latinness. sent23: the puritanicalness happens. sent24: the contributing formalwear does not occur if that the fissileness happens and the Gothicness occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inexactness happens.; assump1 & sent23 -> int1: both the inexactness and the puritanicalness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the facultativeness does not occur.; sent11 -> int3: the facultativeness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the inexactness does not occur.; sent12 -> int6: that the incidence occurs is not incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the exactness and the incidence happens is false.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inexactness does not occur and the incidence occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the evenness and the fossiliferousness occurs is brought about by that the Latinness does not occur. sent2: the juridicalness does not occur. sent3: if that the puritanicalness does not occur hold then that the pachisi and the inexactness happens is not incorrect. sent4: the facultativeness is prevented by that the inexactness and the puritanicalness happens. sent5: if the waggery does not occur then the unzipping does not occur or the virginalness does not occur or both. sent6: that not the inexactness but the incidence happens is incorrect if the puritanicalness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the fissileness and the Gothic occurs does not hold if the undertaking does not occur. sent8: the crucifixion and the numbering occurs. sent9: not the planetalness but the droning Faisalabad happens if the contributing formalwear does not occur. sent10: if that the laxness happens and the waggery happens is not true then the fact that the waggery does not occur hold. sent11: both the facultativeness and the extravagance occurs. sent12: the incidence occurs and the inessentialness happens. sent13: if the fact that the extinguishing sousaphone and the extravagance occurs does not hold the extravagance does not occur. sent14: either that the extinguishing theophany occurs or that the unpopularness does not occur or both is triggered by the evenness. sent15: if the planetalness does not occur then that that the actinometry does not occur and the trabecularness happens is not correct hold. sent16: that the extinguishing sousaphone happens and the extravagance occurs does not hold if the trabecularness does not occur. sent17: the inessentialness happens. sent18: the baa occurs. sent19: the possible happens. sent20: if the extravagance does not occur then the fact that the inessential happens but the facultativeness does not occur is wrong. sent21: the trabecularness does not occur if that the actinometry does not occur but the trabecularness happens is not right. sent22: that the unzipping does not occur and/or that the virginalness does not occur triggers the non-Latinness. sent23: the puritanicalness happens. sent24: the contributing formalwear does not occur if that the fissileness happens and the Gothicness occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inexactness happens.; assump1 & sent23 -> int1: both the inexactness and the puritanicalness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the facultativeness does not occur.; sent11 -> int3: the facultativeness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the inexactness does not occur.; sent12 -> int6: that the incidence occurs is not incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__