the fact that there exists something such that that it is not operculate and it is not a kind of a she-devil does not hold is not correct.
sent1: if the cotton is a kind of a analeptic the fact that the cusk is not a kind of a capture and stokes bolt-hole is not right. sent2: that the auklet is a quarterstaff but it does not stoke bolt-hole is incorrect. sent3: the cusk is not a kind of a capture but it stokes bolt-hole if the auklet is not a haplotype. sent4: the cotton is a drought. sent5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a capture and it is a kind of a analeptic is not correct. sent6: if that the auklet is unthinkable but it is not exodontic is not true it is not a haplotype. sent7: the fact that the cotton is not operculate and it is not a haplotype is incorrect. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is non-operculate thing that is exodontic is wrong. sent9: the cotton is non-operculate. sent10: that the auklet is not a analeptic but it is exodontic is false if the cotton is a haplotype. sent11: if the auklet is thinkable then it is not a haplotype. sent12: the fact that the auklet is unthinkable and is not exodontic is not true. sent13: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-exodontic thing that is a capture is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a haplotype and it is not a analeptic does not hold. sent15: the fact that the cotton is the analeptic if the cotton is not operculate and is not a she-devil hold. sent16: the fact that the cusk is not lacrimal and it does not stoke bolt-hole is not true. sent17: the fact that the fact that the auklet is a celerity but it is not a she-devil is not wrong is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cotton is not operculate and it is not a kind of a she-devil.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cotton is a analeptic hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the cusk does not capture and does stoke bolt-hole is not right.; sent6 & sent12 -> int3: the auklet is not a haplotype.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the cusk does not capture but it does stoke bolt-hole.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the cotton is non-operculate and is not a she-devil does not hold.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it is not operculate and it is not a kind of a she-devil does not hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cotton is a kind of a analeptic the fact that the cusk is not a kind of a capture and stokes bolt-hole is not right. sent2: that the auklet is a quarterstaff but it does not stoke bolt-hole is incorrect. sent3: the cusk is not a kind of a capture but it stokes bolt-hole if the auklet is not a haplotype. sent4: the cotton is a drought. sent5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a capture and it is a kind of a analeptic is not correct. sent6: if that the auklet is unthinkable but it is not exodontic is not true it is not a haplotype. sent7: the fact that the cotton is not operculate and it is not a haplotype is incorrect. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is non-operculate thing that is exodontic is wrong. sent9: the cotton is non-operculate. sent10: that the auklet is not a analeptic but it is exodontic is false if the cotton is a haplotype. sent11: if the auklet is thinkable then it is not a haplotype. sent12: the fact that the auklet is unthinkable and is not exodontic is not true. sent13: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-exodontic thing that is a capture is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a haplotype and it is not a analeptic does not hold. sent15: the fact that the cotton is the analeptic if the cotton is not operculate and is not a she-devil hold. sent16: the fact that the cusk is not lacrimal and it does not stoke bolt-hole is not true. sent17: the fact that the fact that the auklet is a celerity but it is not a she-devil is not wrong is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cotton is not operculate and it is not a kind of a she-devil.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cotton is a analeptic hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the cusk does not capture and does stoke bolt-hole is not right.; sent6 & sent12 -> int3: the auklet is not a haplotype.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the cusk does not capture but it does stoke bolt-hole.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the cotton is non-operculate and is not a she-devil does not hold.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__