the emptying butterfly does not occur if both the sniffing dockyard and the commensurateness occurs.
sent1: if the sniffing dockyard does not occur then the scrambling occurs. sent2: the emptying butterfly does not occur if the fact that the sniffing dockyard occurs and the canonicness occurs is not incorrect. sent3: both the scouting indomitability and the napoleon happens. sent4: the navalness happens. sent5: the canonicness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the sniffing dockyard and the commensurateness happens hold.; assump1 -> int1: the sniffing dockyard occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the sniffing dockyard and the canonicness occurs is right.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the emptying butterfly does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the scrambling and the scouting single occurs is right.
$hypothesis$ = the emptying butterfly does not occur if both the sniffing dockyard and the commensurateness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sniffing dockyard does not occur then the scrambling occurs. sent2: the emptying butterfly does not occur if the fact that the sniffing dockyard occurs and the canonicness occurs is not incorrect. sent3: both the scouting indomitability and the napoleon happens. sent4: the navalness happens. sent5: the canonicness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the sniffing dockyard and the commensurateness happens hold.; assump1 -> int1: the sniffing dockyard occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the sniffing dockyard and the canonicness occurs is right.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the emptying butterfly does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__