the babysitter is disintegrative and/or it is not a protectionism.
sent1: that if the babysitter is the coxswain then the babysitter does not trumpet and does not shelter Savoyard hold. sent2: if something that does shelter Savoyard does not trumpet it is not disintegrative. sent3: if something that does not trumpet does not shelter Savoyard then that it is not a kind of a protectionism is not incorrect. sent4: the babysitter is a coxswain.
sent3 -> int1: the babysitter is not a protectionism if it does not trumpet and does not shelter Savoyard.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the babysitter does not trumpet and it does not shelter Savoyard.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the babysitter is not a protectionism.; int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the babysitter is disintegrative and/or it is not a protectionism. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the babysitter is the coxswain then the babysitter does not trumpet and does not shelter Savoyard hold. sent2: if something that does shelter Savoyard does not trumpet it is not disintegrative. sent3: if something that does not trumpet does not shelter Savoyard then that it is not a kind of a protectionism is not incorrect. sent4: the babysitter is a coxswain. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the babysitter is not a protectionism if it does not trumpet and does not shelter Savoyard.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the babysitter does not trumpet and it does not shelter Savoyard.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the babysitter is not a protectionism.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__