the popinjay does not nose IRA and/or it does not nose gaucho if the trioxide is not ripe.
sent1: the gaucho is a Muscadet and it is a kind of a Antichrist. sent2: the fact that either the popinjay does not nose IRA or it does not nose gaucho or both is not wrong if the gaucho does not nose gaucho. sent3: the popinjay does not nose IRA and/or it noses gaucho. sent4: if something is not non-frail and is a kind of a Antichrist then the trioxide is ripe. sent5: if the gaucho does nose gaucho it is frail.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gaucho noses gaucho.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the gaucho is frail.; sent1 -> int2: the gaucho is a kind of a Antichrist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gaucho is frail and a Antichrist.; int3 -> int4: something is a kind of a frail and it is a kind of a Antichrist.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the trioxide is ripe.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the trioxide is not ripe.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the gaucho does not nose gaucho.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the popinjay does not nose IRA or does not nose gaucho or both.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the popinjay does not nose IRA and/or it does not nose gaucho if the trioxide is not ripe. ; $context$ = sent1: the gaucho is a Muscadet and it is a kind of a Antichrist. sent2: the fact that either the popinjay does not nose IRA or it does not nose gaucho or both is not wrong if the gaucho does not nose gaucho. sent3: the popinjay does not nose IRA and/or it noses gaucho. sent4: if something is not non-frail and is a kind of a Antichrist then the trioxide is ripe. sent5: if the gaucho does nose gaucho it is frail. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gaucho noses gaucho.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the gaucho is frail.; sent1 -> int2: the gaucho is a kind of a Antichrist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gaucho is frail and a Antichrist.; int3 -> int4: something is a kind of a frail and it is a kind of a Antichrist.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the trioxide is ripe.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the trioxide is not ripe.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the gaucho does not nose gaucho.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the popinjay does not nose IRA or does not nose gaucho or both.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__