the fact that there exists something such that if that it does crucify side-wheeler is not false then that it does not repaint and it angles knobble is not true is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is socialistic is correct that it is non-unperceptive thing that crucifies shortlist is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it does redden blighted that it is not isthmian and it does get nameplate is not right. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is euphonic hold then the fact that it is not a Hegelian and it does ghost is not true. sent4: if the Yquem does crucify side-wheeler then it does not repaint and it does angle knobble. sent5: there is something such that if it crucifies side-wheeler it does not repaint and it angles knobble. sent6: if the Pilate reddens crowded then that it does not repaint and is a tango does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is Puranic then the fact that it does not redden clansman and it wanes is false. sent8: that the shipmate is not photomechanical but it gets Mexican does not hold if it is archdiocesan. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an instructions the fact that it is not a isohel and it is anatropous is not right. sent10: if the Glycine angles knobble the fact that it is a kind of conventional a isohel is not correct. sent11: that the Yquem does not repaint and angles knobble is false if it does crucify side-wheeler. sent12: that there is something such that if it is arthromeric then the fact that it is not technophobic and it does redden rulership is not right is not false. sent13: that the Yquem is not isthmian but it angles sword does not hold if it is Mozambican. sent14: there exists something such that if it does crucify side-wheeler then that it does repaint and angles knobble is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it is awnless then that it is not a kind of a faun and it does redden xenon does not hold. sent16: if the Yquem does crucify side-wheeler then that it repaints and it does angle knobble is wrong. sent17: there is something such that if it crucifies Glycine that it does not redden monoblast and it is isthmian does not hold. sent18: the fact that the fact that the Yquem does not repaint and is irresolute is wrong is not incorrect if it is unintelligible. sent19: the fact that that something is not a ready-made but it is unperceptive is not incorrect is incorrect if it is a potentiation.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
if the Yquem is a kind of a potentiation the fact that it is not ready-made but unperceptive is wrong.
sent19 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it does crucify side-wheeler is not false then that it does not repaint and it angles knobble is not true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is socialistic is correct that it is non-unperceptive thing that crucifies shortlist is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it does redden blighted that it is not isthmian and it does get nameplate is not right. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is euphonic hold then the fact that it is not a Hegelian and it does ghost is not true. sent4: if the Yquem does crucify side-wheeler then it does not repaint and it does angle knobble. sent5: there is something such that if it crucifies side-wheeler it does not repaint and it angles knobble. sent6: if the Pilate reddens crowded then that it does not repaint and is a tango does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is Puranic then the fact that it does not redden clansman and it wanes is false. sent8: that the shipmate is not photomechanical but it gets Mexican does not hold if it is archdiocesan. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an instructions the fact that it is not a isohel and it is anatropous is not right. sent10: if the Glycine angles knobble the fact that it is a kind of conventional a isohel is not correct. sent11: that the Yquem does not repaint and angles knobble is false if it does crucify side-wheeler. sent12: that there is something such that if it is arthromeric then the fact that it is not technophobic and it does redden rulership is not right is not false. sent13: that the Yquem is not isthmian but it angles sword does not hold if it is Mozambican. sent14: there exists something such that if it does crucify side-wheeler then that it does repaint and angles knobble is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it is awnless then that it is not a kind of a faun and it does redden xenon does not hold. sent16: if the Yquem does crucify side-wheeler then that it repaints and it does angle knobble is wrong. sent17: there is something such that if it crucifies Glycine that it does not redden monoblast and it is isthmian does not hold. sent18: the fact that the fact that the Yquem does not repaint and is irresolute is wrong is not incorrect if it is unintelligible. sent19: the fact that that something is not a ready-made but it is unperceptive is not incorrect is incorrect if it is a potentiation. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__