the carpetbag does not occur.
sent1: the jellifying scad occurs if the preempting clearance occurs. sent2: the barratry does not occur if the fact that the non-Bantoidness and the ACE happens is false. sent3: the cartwheel happens. sent4: if that the preempting Husserl occurs is not wrong that not the Bantoidness but the ACE occurs is false. sent5: the draping cellblock does not occur if the transeuntness occurs but the quiescence does not occur. sent6: that the exceeding Bellis but not the link occurs is triggered by that the barratry does not occur. sent7: the preempting clearance occurs. sent8: that the carpetbag occurs is caused by that the cartwheel does not occur. sent9: that the anachronism does not occur yields that the preempting Husserl and the consultancy occurs. sent10: that the anachronism does not occur and the male does not occur is triggered by the share. sent11: that the sousing happens is brought about by that the exceeding Bellis but not the link happens. sent12: the fact that the carpetbag does not occur is right if the impressionableness does not occur. sent13: if the souse happens then that both the preempting clearance and the non-carpetbagness happens is not true. sent14: that the sousing does not occur is prevented by that the exceeding Bellis happens. sent15: if the jellifying gusto happens the sharing happens. sent16: the jellifying gusto and the brachiation happens if the draping cellblock does not occur. sent17: if the barratry does not occur both the exceeding Bellis and the link happens. sent18: the souse results in that the preempting clearance does not occur and the jellifying scad does not occur. sent19: that not the impressionableness but the cartwheeling happens is not true if the satiateness does not occur. sent20: that the jellifying scad happens is prevented by that the impressionableness and the satiating happens. sent21: if that the fact that the preempting clearance happens and the carpetbag does not occur is wrong hold the carpetbag occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impressionableness happens.; sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the jellifying scad happens.;
the carpetbagness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the carpetbag does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the jellifying scad occurs if the preempting clearance occurs. sent2: the barratry does not occur if the fact that the non-Bantoidness and the ACE happens is false. sent3: the cartwheel happens. sent4: if that the preempting Husserl occurs is not wrong that not the Bantoidness but the ACE occurs is false. sent5: the draping cellblock does not occur if the transeuntness occurs but the quiescence does not occur. sent6: that the exceeding Bellis but not the link occurs is triggered by that the barratry does not occur. sent7: the preempting clearance occurs. sent8: that the carpetbag occurs is caused by that the cartwheel does not occur. sent9: that the anachronism does not occur yields that the preempting Husserl and the consultancy occurs. sent10: that the anachronism does not occur and the male does not occur is triggered by the share. sent11: that the sousing happens is brought about by that the exceeding Bellis but not the link happens. sent12: the fact that the carpetbag does not occur is right if the impressionableness does not occur. sent13: if the souse happens then that both the preempting clearance and the non-carpetbagness happens is not true. sent14: that the sousing does not occur is prevented by that the exceeding Bellis happens. sent15: if the jellifying gusto happens the sharing happens. sent16: the jellifying gusto and the brachiation happens if the draping cellblock does not occur. sent17: if the barratry does not occur both the exceeding Bellis and the link happens. sent18: the souse results in that the preempting clearance does not occur and the jellifying scad does not occur. sent19: that not the impressionableness but the cartwheeling happens is not true if the satiateness does not occur. sent20: that the jellifying scad happens is prevented by that the impressionableness and the satiating happens. sent21: if that the fact that the preempting clearance happens and the carpetbag does not occur is wrong hold the carpetbag occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impressionableness happens.; sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the jellifying scad happens.; __UNKNOWN__