the babassu is an elongation.
sent1: if the Bastille is a Musgu then it is not emphysematous and it is a kind of a Citation. sent2: that the microphage does not splat porter and is myotonic is not correct. sent3: the microphage is not myotonic if the fact that the cordgrass is not myotonic but it does splat porter is not correct. sent4: something finishes devaluation and is not a poundal if it is a Citation. sent5: if the Bastille is autotrophic the bronze is a kind of an elongation. sent6: the babassu outflanks Uzi if that the bronze is not autotrophic is right. sent7: that something outflanks Uzi but it does not sorb does not hold if it is an elongation. sent8: if the bronze is not autotrophic then the babassu does outflank Uzi but it is not a sorb. sent9: if that something does not splat Rhinocerotidae but it is a polity does not hold then it splat Rhinocerotidae. sent10: if the babassu is autotrophic then that it is an elongation and does not outflank Uzi is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the porter is a Musgu and is not emphysematous is wrong if there is something such that it splats Rhinocerotidae. sent12: something is autotrophic if it does finish devaluation and it is not a poundal. sent13: that the absolver does not splat Rhinocerotidae but it is a polity is not true if the microphage is not myotonic. sent14: if the Bastille is a Citation the fact that the bronze is a poundal is not incorrect. sent15: if the fact that the porter is a kind of a Musgu that is not emphysematous is not true then the Bastille is a Citation. sent16: the bronze is not autotrophic. sent17: the babassu does outflank Uzi. sent18: if the absolver is myotonic then the porter splats Rhinocerotidae and is not a kind of a polity. sent19: the babassu is not freelance. sent20: if the porter splats Rhinocerotidae then the Bastille is a Musgu. sent21: something is an elongation and it is autotrophic if it does not finish devaluation. sent22: the fact that the cordgrass is not myotonic and splats porter is false. sent23: that the absolver is myotonic hold if the fact that the microphage does not splat porter and is myotonic is incorrect.
sent7 -> int1: if the babassu is an elongation then that it does outflank Uzi and it is not a sorb is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the babassu is an elongation.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the babassu outflanks Uzi and does not sorb is not right.; sent8 & sent16 -> int3: the babassu outflanks Uzi but it does not sorb.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the babassu is an elongation.
sent21 -> int5: if the babassu does not finish devaluation it is an elongation and it is autotrophic.; sent23 & sent2 -> int6: the absolver is myotonic.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the porter does splat Rhinocerotidae but it is not a polity.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the porter splats Rhinocerotidae hold.; sent20 & int8 -> int9: the Bastille is a Musgu.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the Bastille is a kind of non-emphysematous thing that is a Citation.; int10 -> int11: the Bastille is a Citation.; sent14 & int11 -> int12: the bronze is a kind of a poundal.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is a poundal.;
$hypothesis$ = the babassu is an elongation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Bastille is a Musgu then it is not emphysematous and it is a kind of a Citation. sent2: that the microphage does not splat porter and is myotonic is not correct. sent3: the microphage is not myotonic if the fact that the cordgrass is not myotonic but it does splat porter is not correct. sent4: something finishes devaluation and is not a poundal if it is a Citation. sent5: if the Bastille is autotrophic the bronze is a kind of an elongation. sent6: the babassu outflanks Uzi if that the bronze is not autotrophic is right. sent7: that something outflanks Uzi but it does not sorb does not hold if it is an elongation. sent8: if the bronze is not autotrophic then the babassu does outflank Uzi but it is not a sorb. sent9: if that something does not splat Rhinocerotidae but it is a polity does not hold then it splat Rhinocerotidae. sent10: if the babassu is autotrophic then that it is an elongation and does not outflank Uzi is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the porter is a Musgu and is not emphysematous is wrong if there is something such that it splats Rhinocerotidae. sent12: something is autotrophic if it does finish devaluation and it is not a poundal. sent13: that the absolver does not splat Rhinocerotidae but it is a polity is not true if the microphage is not myotonic. sent14: if the Bastille is a Citation the fact that the bronze is a poundal is not incorrect. sent15: if the fact that the porter is a kind of a Musgu that is not emphysematous is not true then the Bastille is a Citation. sent16: the bronze is not autotrophic. sent17: the babassu does outflank Uzi. sent18: if the absolver is myotonic then the porter splats Rhinocerotidae and is not a kind of a polity. sent19: the babassu is not freelance. sent20: if the porter splats Rhinocerotidae then the Bastille is a Musgu. sent21: something is an elongation and it is autotrophic if it does not finish devaluation. sent22: the fact that the cordgrass is not myotonic and splats porter is false. sent23: that the absolver is myotonic hold if the fact that the microphage does not splat porter and is myotonic is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the babassu is an elongation then that it does outflank Uzi and it is not a sorb is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the babassu is an elongation.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the babassu outflanks Uzi and does not sorb is not right.; sent8 & sent16 -> int3: the babassu outflanks Uzi but it does not sorb.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__