that there is something such that if the fact that it is unpaintable is right then it does not prod bittercress or it does not heighten or both is wrong.
sent1: if something does housekeep Astor it is not unpaintable and it does not illuminate. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a boathouse but it is not a dauntlessness does not hold then that it is not a boathouse is not incorrect. sent3: if something does not justify phytoplankton then that that it does not housekeep boned and/or it does not heighten is right is not correct. sent4: if something is not necrotic that it is a boathouse that is not a dauntlessness is incorrect. sent5: if something is not a boathouse that it housekeeps Astor is not false. sent6: the mignonette is necrotic. sent7: if the mignonette is a cytotoxin and it is necrotic the phytoplankton is not necrotic. sent8: that the stunner is unpaintable hold. sent9: something is not unpaintable if that it either does not prod bittercress or does not heighten or both does not hold. sent10: if something is a kind of paintable thing that does not illuminate it does not justify phytoplankton.
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the bristlegrass does not prod bittercress and/or it does not heighten is not right it is not unpaintable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that either the bristlegrass does not prod bittercress or it does not heighten or both is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bristlegrass is not unpaintable.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the bristlegrass is unpaintable hold.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bristlegrass does not prod bittercress and/or does not heighten.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: either the bristlegrass does not prod bittercress or it does not heighten or both if it is unpaintable.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that the phytoplankton does not housekeep boned or does not heighten or both is not correct.
sent3 -> int6: that either the phytoplankton does not housekeep boned or it does not heighten or both is not correct if it does not justify phytoplankton.; sent10 -> int7: the phytoplankton does not justify phytoplankton if it is not unpaintable and it does not illuminate.; sent1 -> int8: the phytoplankton is not unpaintable and it does not illuminate if it does housekeep Astor.; sent5 -> int9: if that the phytoplankton is not a kind of a boathouse is not incorrect then it does housekeep Astor.; sent2 -> int10: the phytoplankton is not a boathouse if the fact that it is a kind of a boathouse and is not a dauntlessness does not hold.; sent4 -> int11: if the phytoplankton is not necrotic then that it is a boathouse and it is not a dauntlessness is false.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it is unpaintable is right then it does not prod bittercress or it does not heighten or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does housekeep Astor it is not unpaintable and it does not illuminate. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a boathouse but it is not a dauntlessness does not hold then that it is not a boathouse is not incorrect. sent3: if something does not justify phytoplankton then that that it does not housekeep boned and/or it does not heighten is right is not correct. sent4: if something is not necrotic that it is a boathouse that is not a dauntlessness is incorrect. sent5: if something is not a boathouse that it housekeeps Astor is not false. sent6: the mignonette is necrotic. sent7: if the mignonette is a cytotoxin and it is necrotic the phytoplankton is not necrotic. sent8: that the stunner is unpaintable hold. sent9: something is not unpaintable if that it either does not prod bittercress or does not heighten or both does not hold. sent10: if something is a kind of paintable thing that does not illuminate it does not justify phytoplankton. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the bristlegrass does not prod bittercress and/or it does not heighten is not right it is not unpaintable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that either the bristlegrass does not prod bittercress or it does not heighten or both is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bristlegrass is not unpaintable.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the bristlegrass is unpaintable hold.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bristlegrass does not prod bittercress and/or does not heighten.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: either the bristlegrass does not prod bittercress or it does not heighten or both if it is unpaintable.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__