there exists something such that if it does not undercharge the fact that it does hedge gimmickry and is a feud is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it does not undercharge is not wrong then it hedges gimmickry and is a feud. sent2: that the censor is a pawn and it does undercharge does not hold if it does not dissimilate flurazepam. sent3: there is something such that if it is not Alpine then that it does malfunction and it is a gobble is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not a decigram is not false then the fact that it is both a malfunctioning and bold does not hold. sent5: if the perturbation is not onshore the fact that it is a kind of a undercharge and it incarnates is not right. sent6: the fact that the fact that the perturbation hedges gimmickry and is not non-insecticidal is not wrong is not right if it is not a bearskin. sent7: that the perturbation hedges gimmickry and it is a feud is not true if it is a undercharge. sent8: the perturbation does hedge gimmickry and feuds if it is not a undercharge. sent9: if the ischium does not hedge underbrush that it is a prang and a undercharge is false. sent10: that something is nectariferous and it dissimilates waterskin is not right if it does not undercharge. sent11: there exists something such that if it is conclusive then the fact that it is socioeconomic and it is a kind of a quadratic is not true. sent12: there is something such that if it is not salable the fact that it does dissimilate intrigue and it is unorthodox is not correct. sent13: there is something such that if it is a undercharge that it does hedge gimmickry and it does feud is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not inconsiderable then it is a kind of lower-class a zoom. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not hedge novocaine the fact that it is a kind of a bearskin and it is a gong is not right. sent16: that the perturbation does hedge gimmickry and it is a feud does not hold if it is not a kind of a undercharge. sent17: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not bipolar then the fact that it is intuitionist and it sentimentalizes is not right is right. sent18: the fact that the wire-puller is a antiquark and a mission does not hold if it is not a maggot. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of a night-light that does dissimilate turnout is false if it does not dissimilate on-license. sent20: that the impairer is an intrusion that is strong is not correct if it is not a undercharge. sent21: that if something is not a kind of a Wakashan that it is insecticidal and it is a kind of a lowercase does not hold is not false.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
that the flurazepam is nectariferous and it dissimilates waterskin is false if it does not undercharge.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not undercharge the fact that it does hedge gimmickry and is a feud is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it does not undercharge is not wrong then it hedges gimmickry and is a feud. sent2: that the censor is a pawn and it does undercharge does not hold if it does not dissimilate flurazepam. sent3: there is something such that if it is not Alpine then that it does malfunction and it is a gobble is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not a decigram is not false then the fact that it is both a malfunctioning and bold does not hold. sent5: if the perturbation is not onshore the fact that it is a kind of a undercharge and it incarnates is not right. sent6: the fact that the fact that the perturbation hedges gimmickry and is not non-insecticidal is not wrong is not right if it is not a bearskin. sent7: that the perturbation hedges gimmickry and it is a feud is not true if it is a undercharge. sent8: the perturbation does hedge gimmickry and feuds if it is not a undercharge. sent9: if the ischium does not hedge underbrush that it is a prang and a undercharge is false. sent10: that something is nectariferous and it dissimilates waterskin is not right if it does not undercharge. sent11: there exists something such that if it is conclusive then the fact that it is socioeconomic and it is a kind of a quadratic is not true. sent12: there is something such that if it is not salable the fact that it does dissimilate intrigue and it is unorthodox is not correct. sent13: there is something such that if it is a undercharge that it does hedge gimmickry and it does feud is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not inconsiderable then it is a kind of lower-class a zoom. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not hedge novocaine the fact that it is a kind of a bearskin and it is a gong is not right. sent16: that the perturbation does hedge gimmickry and it is a feud does not hold if it is not a kind of a undercharge. sent17: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not bipolar then the fact that it is intuitionist and it sentimentalizes is not right is right. sent18: the fact that the wire-puller is a antiquark and a mission does not hold if it is not a maggot. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of a night-light that does dissimilate turnout is false if it does not dissimilate on-license. sent20: that the impairer is an intrusion that is strong is not correct if it is not a undercharge. sent21: that if something is not a kind of a Wakashan that it is insecticidal and it is a kind of a lowercase does not hold is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__