the club-moss does shush downside.
sent1: That the jogging does not dunk postdoc is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the monocyte is not gastronomic but it is a feminization is not true the sheep-tick is not a Zsigmondy. sent3: if that something is a Zsigmondy is right then it dunks jogging. sent4: the sheep-tick is a feminization if something that is concentric does not dunk cask. sent5: the postdoc is a Zsigmondy if there is something such that that it is concentric thing that does not dunk cask is not correct. sent6: that the postdoc does not dunk jogging is not incorrect. sent7: if the sheep-tick is a feminization then the club-moss does shush downside.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the winger is concentric and does not dunk cask is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is concentric and it does not dunk cask is not correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the postdoc is a kind of a Zsigmondy.; sent3 -> int3: if the postdoc is a kind of a Zsigmondy then it dunks jogging.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the postdoc does dunk jogging is not false.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the winger is concentric and does not dunk cask.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is concentric and it does not dunk cask.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the sheep-tick is a kind of a feminization.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the club-moss does not shush downside is right.
$hypothesis$ = the club-moss does shush downside. ; $context$ = sent1: That the jogging does not dunk postdoc is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the monocyte is not gastronomic but it is a feminization is not true the sheep-tick is not a Zsigmondy. sent3: if that something is a Zsigmondy is right then it dunks jogging. sent4: the sheep-tick is a feminization if something that is concentric does not dunk cask. sent5: the postdoc is a Zsigmondy if there is something such that that it is concentric thing that does not dunk cask is not correct. sent6: that the postdoc does not dunk jogging is not incorrect. sent7: if the sheep-tick is a feminization then the club-moss does shush downside. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the winger is concentric and does not dunk cask is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is concentric and it does not dunk cask is not correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the postdoc is a kind of a Zsigmondy.; sent3 -> int3: if the postdoc is a kind of a Zsigmondy then it dunks jogging.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the postdoc does dunk jogging is not false.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the winger is concentric and does not dunk cask.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is concentric and it does not dunk cask.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the sheep-tick is a kind of a feminization.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__