the fact that the fact that either the plasterboard is a kind of an acute or it does not unscrew bigamist or both is incorrect is true.
sent1: if the bigamist does not unscrew seat and is a ukase the seat does not read tongued. sent2: if something is branchiate the samarium is branchiate and/or does freshen. sent3: the fact that if something that does not freshen is not branchiate then the ununbium is not a kind of a ukase is right. sent4: the bigamist freshens if the samarium is branchiate. sent5: if the seat is an acute then that the plasterboard is an acute and/or it does not unscrew bigamist is not true. sent6: if something is asymptotic and it captures Leary then it is a kind of a ukase. sent7: if something is a kind of acute thing that does not unscrew bigamist it does unscrew seat. sent8: the tarpaulin is an acute and does not unscrew bigamist if the seat freshens. sent9: something is branchiate if the fact that it is not branchiate and it is not a Muscovite is not right. sent10: if that the seat does not read tongued is true the plasterboard is an acute or it does not unscrew bigamist or both. sent11: something that freshens does not unscrew seat and is a ukase. sent12: the fact that the bigamist does not freshen is not false. sent13: something is a ukase if it is not asymptotic and it does capture Leary. sent14: something does read tongued if that it is not asymptotic and it does capture Leary is wrong. sent15: if the ununbium does unscrew seat the seat is an acute. sent16: the fact that something is not branchiate and is not Muscovite does not hold if it is not a cleavers. sent17: something is non-dark if that it unscrews plasterboard and it is a non-dark is not right. sent18: the fact that the anticholinesterase unscrews plasterboard and it is dark is incorrect. sent19: if the ununbium is asymptotic it reads tongued. sent20: the fact that the bigamist does not freshen and is not branchiate hold. sent21: the Javanese is not a cleavers if there is something such that it is not a dark.
sent13 -> int1: if the ununbium is not asymptotic but it captures Leary then it is a kind of a ukase.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ununbium is not asymptotic but it captures Leary.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the ununbium is a kind of a ukase is correct.; sent20 -> int3: something does not freshen and it is not branchiate.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the ununbium is not a ukase is not wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the ununbium is not asymptotic but it captures Leary is not true.; sent14 -> int7: if that the ununbium is not asymptotic but it captures Leary is false it does read tongued.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the ununbium reads tongued.;
the plasterboard is an acute or does not unscrew bigamist or both.
sent11 -> int9: if the bigamist freshens it does not unscrew seat and it is a kind of a ukase.; sent9 -> int10: if the fact that the Javanese is not branchiate and it is not a kind of a Muscovite is incorrect then it is branchiate.; sent16 -> int11: if the Javanese is not a cleavers then the fact that it is not branchiate and it is not a Muscovite does not hold.; sent17 -> int12: if that the anticholinesterase does unscrew plasterboard and is a dark is incorrect then it is not a dark.; int12 & sent18 -> int13: the anticholinesterase is non-dark.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not a dark.; int14 & sent21 -> int15: the Javanese is not a cleavers.; int11 & int15 -> int16: that the Javanese is not branchiate and not Muscovite is wrong.; int10 & int16 -> int17: the Javanese is not non-branchiate.; int17 -> int18: there are branchiate things.; int18 & sent2 -> int19: the samarium is branchiate and/or does freshen.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that either the plasterboard is a kind of an acute or it does not unscrew bigamist or both is incorrect is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bigamist does not unscrew seat and is a ukase the seat does not read tongued. sent2: if something is branchiate the samarium is branchiate and/or does freshen. sent3: the fact that if something that does not freshen is not branchiate then the ununbium is not a kind of a ukase is right. sent4: the bigamist freshens if the samarium is branchiate. sent5: if the seat is an acute then that the plasterboard is an acute and/or it does not unscrew bigamist is not true. sent6: if something is asymptotic and it captures Leary then it is a kind of a ukase. sent7: if something is a kind of acute thing that does not unscrew bigamist it does unscrew seat. sent8: the tarpaulin is an acute and does not unscrew bigamist if the seat freshens. sent9: something is branchiate if the fact that it is not branchiate and it is not a Muscovite is not right. sent10: if that the seat does not read tongued is true the plasterboard is an acute or it does not unscrew bigamist or both. sent11: something that freshens does not unscrew seat and is a ukase. sent12: the fact that the bigamist does not freshen is not false. sent13: something is a ukase if it is not asymptotic and it does capture Leary. sent14: something does read tongued if that it is not asymptotic and it does capture Leary is wrong. sent15: if the ununbium does unscrew seat the seat is an acute. sent16: the fact that something is not branchiate and is not Muscovite does not hold if it is not a cleavers. sent17: something is non-dark if that it unscrews plasterboard and it is a non-dark is not right. sent18: the fact that the anticholinesterase unscrews plasterboard and it is dark is incorrect. sent19: if the ununbium is asymptotic it reads tongued. sent20: the fact that the bigamist does not freshen and is not branchiate hold. sent21: the Javanese is not a cleavers if there is something such that it is not a dark. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the ununbium is not asymptotic but it captures Leary then it is a kind of a ukase.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ununbium is not asymptotic but it captures Leary.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the ununbium is a kind of a ukase is correct.; sent20 -> int3: something does not freshen and it is not branchiate.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the ununbium is not a ukase is not wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the ununbium is not asymptotic but it captures Leary is not true.; sent14 -> int7: if that the ununbium is not asymptotic but it captures Leary is false it does read tongued.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the ununbium reads tongued.; __UNKNOWN__