the fact that that the opening bassist but not the glow occurs is not correct if the dysphoricness happens does not hold.
sent1: the googly happens. sent2: if the dysphoricness happens then the opening bassist occurs and the glow does not occur. sent3: that the cambering salvinorin occurs and the littering happens is wrong if the fact that the propaedeutic does not occur is true. sent4: if the abrogation happens and the cruciferousness happens the stake does not occur. sent5: that the googly happens and the dysphoricness occurs causes the non-conceptualisticness. sent6: that the opening bassist occurs and the glowing occurs is incorrect. sent7: that the tonometry and the non-dyslexicness occurs is wrong if the fact that the googly does not occur is not wrong. sent8: if the conceptualisticness does not occur the fact that the fact that the opening bassist but not the glowing occurs is false is not wrong. sent9: the opening bassist but not the glowing happens. sent10: that the opening bassist happens but the glowing does not occur is brought about by that the conceptualisticness does not occur. sent11: if the murmur does not occur then the fact that the parcellation occurs but the unpaintableness does not occur is not right. sent12: that the littering does not occur is correct if the fact that the fact that both the cambering salvinorin and the littering occurs is true is not right. sent13: the fact that the opening bassist does not occur and the glow happens is wrong if the litter does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the dysphoricness happens is not incorrect that the opening bassist occurs and the glowing occurs is false. sent15: if the conceptualisticness does not occur the fact that the opening bassist occurs and the glow happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dysphoricness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the googly and the dysphoricness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the conceptualisticness does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: that the opening bassist occurs and the glowing does not occur is incorrect.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the tonometry but not the dyslexicness happens is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the opening bassist but not the glow occurs is not correct if the dysphoricness happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the googly happens. sent2: if the dysphoricness happens then the opening bassist occurs and the glow does not occur. sent3: that the cambering salvinorin occurs and the littering happens is wrong if the fact that the propaedeutic does not occur is true. sent4: if the abrogation happens and the cruciferousness happens the stake does not occur. sent5: that the googly happens and the dysphoricness occurs causes the non-conceptualisticness. sent6: that the opening bassist occurs and the glowing occurs is incorrect. sent7: that the tonometry and the non-dyslexicness occurs is wrong if the fact that the googly does not occur is not wrong. sent8: if the conceptualisticness does not occur the fact that the fact that the opening bassist but not the glowing occurs is false is not wrong. sent9: the opening bassist but not the glowing happens. sent10: that the opening bassist happens but the glowing does not occur is brought about by that the conceptualisticness does not occur. sent11: if the murmur does not occur then the fact that the parcellation occurs but the unpaintableness does not occur is not right. sent12: that the littering does not occur is correct if the fact that the fact that both the cambering salvinorin and the littering occurs is true is not right. sent13: the fact that the opening bassist does not occur and the glow happens is wrong if the litter does not occur. sent14: if the fact that the dysphoricness happens is not incorrect that the opening bassist occurs and the glowing occurs is false. sent15: if the conceptualisticness does not occur the fact that the opening bassist occurs and the glow happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dysphoricness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the googly and the dysphoricness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the conceptualisticness does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: that the opening bassist occurs and the glowing does not occur is incorrect.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__