the prosecutor is a teapot.
sent1: the occult is permissible and it is a tumefaction. sent2: the stalker does not premise bookdealer. sent3: the psaltery segments. sent4: the fact that the psaltery is not a obsequiousness and does not obey consultation does not hold if the stalker does not obey consultation. sent5: if the psaltery does not obey consultation the occult premises bookdealer. sent6: if the occult premises bookdealer and it is permissible then the stalker is not a obsequiousness. sent7: if that the finery is not a segment and it is not a obsequiousness is wrong the prosecutor is not a kind of a teapot. sent8: the bobby is a segment if the psaltery segment. sent9: that something is an irregular and it does obey consultation is correct if it does not premise bookdealer. sent10: everything is not a Georgian and is not impassable. sent11: if the pollucite is not Georgian and it is not impassable the psaltery does not obey consultation. sent12: the fact that the fact that the finery is not a segment and is not a obsequiousness is wrong hold if that the stalker is a kind of a obsequiousness does not hold.
sent10 -> int1: the pollucite is not Georgian and it is passable.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the psaltery does not obey consultation.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the occult does premise bookdealer.; sent1 -> int4: that the occult is permissible is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the occult premises bookdealer and is permissible.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the stalker is not a obsequiousness.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that that the finery does not segment and it is not a kind of a obsequiousness is not false does not hold.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the bobby is a segment and it is an irregular.
sent8 & sent3 -> int8: that the bobby is a segment is correct.; sent9 -> int9: if that the bobby does not premise bookdealer hold it is irregular thing that does obey consultation.;
$hypothesis$ = the prosecutor is a teapot. ; $context$ = sent1: the occult is permissible and it is a tumefaction. sent2: the stalker does not premise bookdealer. sent3: the psaltery segments. sent4: the fact that the psaltery is not a obsequiousness and does not obey consultation does not hold if the stalker does not obey consultation. sent5: if the psaltery does not obey consultation the occult premises bookdealer. sent6: if the occult premises bookdealer and it is permissible then the stalker is not a obsequiousness. sent7: if that the finery is not a segment and it is not a obsequiousness is wrong the prosecutor is not a kind of a teapot. sent8: the bobby is a segment if the psaltery segment. sent9: that something is an irregular and it does obey consultation is correct if it does not premise bookdealer. sent10: everything is not a Georgian and is not impassable. sent11: if the pollucite is not Georgian and it is not impassable the psaltery does not obey consultation. sent12: the fact that the fact that the finery is not a segment and is not a obsequiousness is wrong hold if that the stalker is a kind of a obsequiousness does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the pollucite is not Georgian and it is passable.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the psaltery does not obey consultation.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the occult does premise bookdealer.; sent1 -> int4: that the occult is permissible is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the occult premises bookdealer and is permissible.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the stalker is not a obsequiousness.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that that the finery does not segment and it is not a kind of a obsequiousness is not false does not hold.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__