that that the slurping occurs is prevented by the housebreaking does not hold.
sent1: if the geophyticness but not the cryonicsness happens the capitulation does not occur. sent2: that both the housebreaking and the reunifying sucre happens brings about that the slurping does not occur. sent3: the antheridialness happens. sent4: that the reunifying mastery occurs results in either the collar or that the praising does not occur or both. sent5: that the praise does not occur is caused by the collaring and/or that the praise does not occur. sent6: the housebreaking does not occur if the slurping does not occur and the unplayfulness does not occur. sent7: if that the genitalness happens but the cheliferousness does not occur is false then the reunifying sucre happens. sent8: if the reunifying mastery does not occur then that the fact that either the collar does not occur or the praising happens or both hold is not right. sent9: if the CPR happens then the slurping does not occur and the unplayfulness does not occur. sent10: if the lumbarness does not occur both the CPR and the taekwondo happens. sent11: if the deductiveness happens then that the Napoleonicness but not the crocheting plotter happens does not hold. sent12: the fact that the unplayfulness does not occur is true if the fact that both the unplayfulness and the taekwondo happens does not hold. sent13: the reunifying mastery occurs and the reunifying sucre happens if the housebreaking does not occur. sent14: the reunifying mastery does not occur if the genitalness and the non-cheliferousness occurs. sent15: that the convulsing happens and the braveness does not occur is false if the praise does not occur. sent16: if the lumbarness does not occur the sequencing ctenophore does not occur. sent17: that both the unplayfulness and the taekwondo occurs does not hold. sent18: the slurping occurs if the housebreaking occurs and the reunifying sucre happens. sent19: the crocheting ticking does not occur if the fact that the Napoleonicness happens and the crocheting plotter does not occur is false. sent20: if the fact that the pyemicness does not occur is not incorrect the fact that either the sequencing guaiacum does not occur or the sequencing atrium happens or both does not hold. sent21: if that the unplayfulness does not occur is not false either the collar does not occur or the praise happens or both. sent22: the leaving does not occur if the crocheting ticking does not occur. sent23: that the slurping happens hold if the fact that the housebreaking occurs hold. sent24: that the lumbarness does not occur is triggered by that the constriction occurs or that the leaving does not occur or both.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the genitalness but not the cheliferousness occurs.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: the reunifying mastery does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the collaring does not occur and/or the praise occurs is not right.; sent12 & sent17 -> int3: the unplayfulness does not occur.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: either the collar does not occur or the praise happens or both.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the genitalness but not the cheliferousness occurs is not correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the reunifying sucre happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the housebreaking happens.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: the housebreaking occurs and the reunifying sucre happens.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the slurping does not occur.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the convulsing and the non-braveness occurs is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = that that the slurping occurs is prevented by the housebreaking does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the geophyticness but not the cryonicsness happens the capitulation does not occur. sent2: that both the housebreaking and the reunifying sucre happens brings about that the slurping does not occur. sent3: the antheridialness happens. sent4: that the reunifying mastery occurs results in either the collar or that the praising does not occur or both. sent5: that the praise does not occur is caused by the collaring and/or that the praise does not occur. sent6: the housebreaking does not occur if the slurping does not occur and the unplayfulness does not occur. sent7: if that the genitalness happens but the cheliferousness does not occur is false then the reunifying sucre happens. sent8: if the reunifying mastery does not occur then that the fact that either the collar does not occur or the praising happens or both hold is not right. sent9: if the CPR happens then the slurping does not occur and the unplayfulness does not occur. sent10: if the lumbarness does not occur both the CPR and the taekwondo happens. sent11: if the deductiveness happens then that the Napoleonicness but not the crocheting plotter happens does not hold. sent12: the fact that the unplayfulness does not occur is true if the fact that both the unplayfulness and the taekwondo happens does not hold. sent13: the reunifying mastery occurs and the reunifying sucre happens if the housebreaking does not occur. sent14: the reunifying mastery does not occur if the genitalness and the non-cheliferousness occurs. sent15: that the convulsing happens and the braveness does not occur is false if the praise does not occur. sent16: if the lumbarness does not occur the sequencing ctenophore does not occur. sent17: that both the unplayfulness and the taekwondo occurs does not hold. sent18: the slurping occurs if the housebreaking occurs and the reunifying sucre happens. sent19: the crocheting ticking does not occur if the fact that the Napoleonicness happens and the crocheting plotter does not occur is false. sent20: if the fact that the pyemicness does not occur is not incorrect the fact that either the sequencing guaiacum does not occur or the sequencing atrium happens or both does not hold. sent21: if that the unplayfulness does not occur is not false either the collar does not occur or the praise happens or both. sent22: the leaving does not occur if the crocheting ticking does not occur. sent23: that the slurping happens hold if the fact that the housebreaking occurs hold. sent24: that the lumbarness does not occur is triggered by that the constriction occurs or that the leaving does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the genitalness but not the cheliferousness occurs.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: the reunifying mastery does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the collaring does not occur and/or the praise occurs is not right.; sent12 & sent17 -> int3: the unplayfulness does not occur.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: either the collar does not occur or the praise happens or both.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the genitalness but not the cheliferousness occurs is not correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the reunifying sucre happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the housebreaking happens.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: the housebreaking occurs and the reunifying sucre happens.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the slurping does not occur.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__