the fact that the encircling emulsion does not occur and the portfolio occurs is incorrect if the Aleutiansness happens.
sent1: if the catastrophe occurs the occurrence happens. sent2: the subsonicness and the federalizing molality happens. sent3: the encircling emulsion does not occur and the portfolio happens if the Aleutiansness occurs. sent4: the infrequentness occurs. sent5: if the tying does not occur that that both the encircling emulsion and the portfolio occurs is not false is incorrect. sent6: the inconstantness happens. sent7: if the heaviness does not occur then the fact that the ninjutsu does not occur but the thaw occurs is not right. sent8: if the nonionicness happens then the conditions occurs. sent9: the fact that the fact that the subtracting rough does not occur and the stumbling happens is true is not true if the fantasizing occurs. sent10: not the encircling emulsion but the portfolio occurs. sent11: the mooing does not occur if the encircling Sceliphron and the adaptation happens. sent12: if the tie occurs then the snowing gazebo happens. sent13: the fact that the encircling emulsion and the portfolio happens does not hold if the Aleutiansness occurs. sent14: the anestrousness does not occur. sent15: the encircling emulsion does not occur but the portfolio occurs if the tie does not occur. sent16: if the tie does not occur then that not the encircling emulsion but the portfolio happens is wrong. sent17: the fact that the encircling emulsion happens and the portfolio happens does not hold. sent18: the Aleutiansness does not occur if the snowing gazebo happens and the predominating happens. sent19: both the predominating and the subsonicness occurs. sent20: the compressibleness happens. sent21: if the portfolio does not occur then the fact that the predominating does not occur and the Aleutiansness does not occur is wrong. sent22: the subsonicness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tying occurs.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: the snowing gazebo happens.; sent19 -> int2: the predominating happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snowing gazebo happens and the predominating happens.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the Aleutiansness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Aleutiansness occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the tie does not occur.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: that the encircling emulsion does not occur but the portfolio occurs is not right.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the emitting occurs.
sent2 -> int8: the subsonicness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the encircling emulsion does not occur and the portfolio occurs is incorrect if the Aleutiansness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the catastrophe occurs the occurrence happens. sent2: the subsonicness and the federalizing molality happens. sent3: the encircling emulsion does not occur and the portfolio happens if the Aleutiansness occurs. sent4: the infrequentness occurs. sent5: if the tying does not occur that that both the encircling emulsion and the portfolio occurs is not false is incorrect. sent6: the inconstantness happens. sent7: if the heaviness does not occur then the fact that the ninjutsu does not occur but the thaw occurs is not right. sent8: if the nonionicness happens then the conditions occurs. sent9: the fact that the fact that the subtracting rough does not occur and the stumbling happens is true is not true if the fantasizing occurs. sent10: not the encircling emulsion but the portfolio occurs. sent11: the mooing does not occur if the encircling Sceliphron and the adaptation happens. sent12: if the tie occurs then the snowing gazebo happens. sent13: the fact that the encircling emulsion and the portfolio happens does not hold if the Aleutiansness occurs. sent14: the anestrousness does not occur. sent15: the encircling emulsion does not occur but the portfolio occurs if the tie does not occur. sent16: if the tie does not occur then that not the encircling emulsion but the portfolio happens is wrong. sent17: the fact that the encircling emulsion happens and the portfolio happens does not hold. sent18: the Aleutiansness does not occur if the snowing gazebo happens and the predominating happens. sent19: both the predominating and the subsonicness occurs. sent20: the compressibleness happens. sent21: if the portfolio does not occur then the fact that the predominating does not occur and the Aleutiansness does not occur is wrong. sent22: the subsonicness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tying occurs.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: the snowing gazebo happens.; sent19 -> int2: the predominating happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snowing gazebo happens and the predominating happens.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the Aleutiansness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Aleutiansness occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the tie does not occur.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: that the encircling emulsion does not occur but the portfolio occurs is not right.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__