the theater is either a lacrosse or not a Angora or both.
sent1: if either something does not finalize pongid or it is not a malamute or both it is not antiviral. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is smooth thing that is a kind of a semanticist is not incorrect does not hold the spitfire is a kind of a lacrosse. sent3: there is something such that it is a kind of a Buddhist and it criticizes beta-adrenoceptor. sent4: everything does not finalize pongid or is not a kind of a malamute or both. sent5: the fact that the fact that either the theater is a lacrosse or it is not a Angora or both is false is right if the seltzer is a semanticist. sent6: the luff does finalize pongid and/or it is a kind of a smooth. sent7: if the theater is not a semanticist the fact that the seltzer is a Angora and it is a smooth is not true. sent8: the luff is not an antiviral if it does not finalize pongid. sent9: if the theater is not a semanticist that the luff is a Angora that is antiviral does not hold. sent10: if the spitfire is a kind of a lacrosse the theater is a lacrosse and/or it is not a Angora. sent11: that the seltzer is a smooth and a semanticist is not true if the luff is not an antiviral. sent12: something is not antiviral if it is not smooth or not a lacrosse or both.
sent1 -> int1: if the luff does not finalize pongid and/or it is not a malamute it is not antiviral.; sent4 -> int2: the luff does not finalize pongid and/or it is not a kind of a malamute.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the luff is not an antiviral is not false.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: that the seltzer is a smooth and it is a kind of a semanticist is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is smooth and a semanticist does not hold.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the spitfire is a kind of a lacrosse.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the theater either is a lacrosse or is not a Angora or both is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the theater is either a lacrosse or not a Angora or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if either something does not finalize pongid or it is not a malamute or both it is not antiviral. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is smooth thing that is a kind of a semanticist is not incorrect does not hold the spitfire is a kind of a lacrosse. sent3: there is something such that it is a kind of a Buddhist and it criticizes beta-adrenoceptor. sent4: everything does not finalize pongid or is not a kind of a malamute or both. sent5: the fact that the fact that either the theater is a lacrosse or it is not a Angora or both is false is right if the seltzer is a semanticist. sent6: the luff does finalize pongid and/or it is a kind of a smooth. sent7: if the theater is not a semanticist the fact that the seltzer is a Angora and it is a smooth is not true. sent8: the luff is not an antiviral if it does not finalize pongid. sent9: if the theater is not a semanticist that the luff is a Angora that is antiviral does not hold. sent10: if the spitfire is a kind of a lacrosse the theater is a lacrosse and/or it is not a Angora. sent11: that the seltzer is a smooth and a semanticist is not true if the luff is not an antiviral. sent12: something is not antiviral if it is not smooth or not a lacrosse or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the luff does not finalize pongid and/or it is not a malamute it is not antiviral.; sent4 -> int2: the luff does not finalize pongid and/or it is not a kind of a malamute.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the luff is not an antiviral is not false.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: that the seltzer is a smooth and it is a kind of a semanticist is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is smooth and a semanticist does not hold.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the spitfire is a kind of a lacrosse.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__