the cunnilingus is not prenatal.
sent1: if that something curvets pretension but it is not a flashcard does not hold then it does not curvets pretension. sent2: if the cunnilingus grooves reforestation and it does heal then it fights transferer. sent3: there is something such that it fights transferer. sent4: if a non-federal thing is prenatal then the fact that it is a kind of a bar is true. sent5: if there is something such that it is not metamorphic then the chocolate does fight transferer. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a bar and it is not federal hold is not right then the gambrel is not metamorphic. sent7: the cunnilingus does not groove reforestation. sent8: the hangnail grooves chocolate if it sights Haplopappus. sent9: something sights Harmsworth if it grooves chocolate. sent10: the chocolate is metamorphic if something is prenatal and fights transferer. sent11: if the chocolate does bar then that it is both metamorphic and not federal is not right. sent12: if something that does not groove reforestation does heal then it does fight transferer. sent13: everything does not groove reforestation and it heals. sent14: if the fact that something is both metamorphic and non-federal is not right it is not metamorphic. sent15: the chocolate is a kind of a bar. sent16: something that does groove reforestation and does heal fights transferer. sent17: the fact that the chocolate is not non-federal but it does not fight transferer is false if that it is a bar is correct. sent18: the fact that something is not a bar but non-federal is incorrect if it sights Harmsworth. sent19: the hangnail does sight Haplopappus. sent20: everything does not groove reforestation.
sent13 -> int1: the cunnilingus does not groove reforestation but it does heal.; sent12 -> int2: if the cunnilingus does not groove reforestation but it heals then that it does fight transferer hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cunnilingus does fight transferer.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cunnilingus is prenatal hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the cunnilingus is prenatal and it fights transferer.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is prenatal and fights transferer.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the chocolate is metamorphic.; sent14 -> int7: if the fact that the chocolate is both metamorphic and not federal is not right it is not metamorphic.; sent11 & sent15 -> int8: that the chocolate is metamorphic and is not federal does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the chocolate is not metamorphic.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the cunnilingus is prenatal.
sent18 -> int11: if that the hangnail sights Harmsworth hold the fact that it is not a bar and it is not federal is not correct.; sent9 -> int12: if the hangnail grooves chocolate then it sights Harmsworth.; sent8 & sent19 -> int13: the hangnail grooves chocolate.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the hangnail sights Harmsworth.; int11 & int14 -> int15: that the hangnail is not a bar and it is not federal is not right.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it does not bar and is not federal is not correct.; int16 & sent6 -> int17: the gambrel is not metamorphic.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is not metamorphic.; int18 & sent5 -> int19: the chocolate does fight transferer.; int19 -> int20: something does fight transferer.;
$hypothesis$ = the cunnilingus is not prenatal. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something curvets pretension but it is not a flashcard does not hold then it does not curvets pretension. sent2: if the cunnilingus grooves reforestation and it does heal then it fights transferer. sent3: there is something such that it fights transferer. sent4: if a non-federal thing is prenatal then the fact that it is a kind of a bar is true. sent5: if there is something such that it is not metamorphic then the chocolate does fight transferer. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a bar and it is not federal hold is not right then the gambrel is not metamorphic. sent7: the cunnilingus does not groove reforestation. sent8: the hangnail grooves chocolate if it sights Haplopappus. sent9: something sights Harmsworth if it grooves chocolate. sent10: the chocolate is metamorphic if something is prenatal and fights transferer. sent11: if the chocolate does bar then that it is both metamorphic and not federal is not right. sent12: if something that does not groove reforestation does heal then it does fight transferer. sent13: everything does not groove reforestation and it heals. sent14: if the fact that something is both metamorphic and non-federal is not right it is not metamorphic. sent15: the chocolate is a kind of a bar. sent16: something that does groove reforestation and does heal fights transferer. sent17: the fact that the chocolate is not non-federal but it does not fight transferer is false if that it is a bar is correct. sent18: the fact that something is not a bar but non-federal is incorrect if it sights Harmsworth. sent19: the hangnail does sight Haplopappus. sent20: everything does not groove reforestation. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the cunnilingus does not groove reforestation but it does heal.; sent12 -> int2: if the cunnilingus does not groove reforestation but it heals then that it does fight transferer hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cunnilingus does fight transferer.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cunnilingus is prenatal hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the cunnilingus is prenatal and it fights transferer.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is prenatal and fights transferer.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the chocolate is metamorphic.; sent14 -> int7: if the fact that the chocolate is both metamorphic and not federal is not right it is not metamorphic.; sent11 & sent15 -> int8: that the chocolate is metamorphic and is not federal does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the chocolate is not metamorphic.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__