the fact that the .38-caliberness does not occur and the sequestration does not occur is false.
sent1: either the tornado does not occur or the impressionisticness occurs or both. sent2: that that the acceleration does not occur and the clerkship does not occur does not hold if the submission occurs hold. sent3: that not the liaison but the harshness occurs is not right. sent4: that the burnup does not occur brings about that the acceleration does not occur and the clerkship does not occur. sent5: that the .38-caliberness does not occur and the sequestration does not occur is not correct if the prehensileness does not occur. sent6: the fact that both the yielding ammine and the non-angiomatousness occurs is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the bombardment occurs is true the yielding Egyptian does not occur and the submission occurs. sent8: that the submission does not occur or the bombardment or both prevents the prehensileness. sent9: that the fact that the sequestration but not the bombardment happens is not true is not false if the burnup happens. sent10: the burnup does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the submission happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the acceleration does not occur and the clerkship does not occur is incorrect.; sent4 & sent10 -> int2: the acceleration does not occur and the clerkship does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the submission does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the submission does not occur or the bombardment occurs or both.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the prehensileness does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the yielding Egyptian does not occur and the endomorphicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the .38-caliberness does not occur and the sequestration does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: either the tornado does not occur or the impressionisticness occurs or both. sent2: that that the acceleration does not occur and the clerkship does not occur does not hold if the submission occurs hold. sent3: that not the liaison but the harshness occurs is not right. sent4: that the burnup does not occur brings about that the acceleration does not occur and the clerkship does not occur. sent5: that the .38-caliberness does not occur and the sequestration does not occur is not correct if the prehensileness does not occur. sent6: the fact that both the yielding ammine and the non-angiomatousness occurs is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the bombardment occurs is true the yielding Egyptian does not occur and the submission occurs. sent8: that the submission does not occur or the bombardment or both prevents the prehensileness. sent9: that the fact that the sequestration but not the bombardment happens is not true is not false if the burnup happens. sent10: the burnup does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the submission happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the acceleration does not occur and the clerkship does not occur is incorrect.; sent4 & sent10 -> int2: the acceleration does not occur and the clerkship does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the submission does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the submission does not occur or the bombardment occurs or both.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the prehensileness does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__