the fact that if the instructionalness happens that the moralism does not occur or the tour does not occur or both is not true is wrong.
sent1: the guesstimate happens and the moralism does not occur if the tour occurs. sent2: the channel is prevented by that the tour does not occur. sent3: if the moralism does not occur the channeling does not occur. sent4: the asking Chardonnay does not occur if the cecalness does not occur. sent5: if that both the asking pothole and the hyphenation occurs does not hold the leaching unfriendliness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the Javaneseness does not occur is true if the becoming does not occur. sent7: if the channel does not occur then the fact that both the logogrammaticness and the cable occurs is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the placebo does not occur and/or the medievalness does not occur is not correct. sent9: the fact that both the photography and the devices happens does not hold if the casketing closet does not occur. sent10: the channel happens if the moralism does not occur. sent11: if the logogrammaticness does not occur not the channeling but the tour occurs. sent12: if the fact that the logogrammaticness happens and the cable happens is false the instructionalness does not occur. sent13: the moralism does not occur and/or the tour does not occur if the instructionalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the instructionalness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that either the moralism does not occur or the tour does not occur or both.; assump2 & sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the channeling does not occur.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: that the logogrammaticness occurs and the cable occurs does not hold.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the instructionalness does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the moralism does not occur and/or the touring does not occur does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the guesstimating happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the instructionalness happens that the moralism does not occur or the tour does not occur or both is not true is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the guesstimate happens and the moralism does not occur if the tour occurs. sent2: the channel is prevented by that the tour does not occur. sent3: if the moralism does not occur the channeling does not occur. sent4: the asking Chardonnay does not occur if the cecalness does not occur. sent5: if that both the asking pothole and the hyphenation occurs does not hold the leaching unfriendliness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the Javaneseness does not occur is true if the becoming does not occur. sent7: if the channel does not occur then the fact that both the logogrammaticness and the cable occurs is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the placebo does not occur and/or the medievalness does not occur is not correct. sent9: the fact that both the photography and the devices happens does not hold if the casketing closet does not occur. sent10: the channel happens if the moralism does not occur. sent11: if the logogrammaticness does not occur not the channeling but the tour occurs. sent12: if the fact that the logogrammaticness happens and the cable happens is false the instructionalness does not occur. sent13: the moralism does not occur and/or the tour does not occur if the instructionalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the instructionalness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that either the moralism does not occur or the tour does not occur or both.; assump2 & sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the channeling does not occur.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: that the logogrammaticness occurs and the cable occurs does not hold.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the instructionalness does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the moralism does not occur and/or the touring does not occur does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__