the contamination is a twitch.
sent1: the fact that the miscegenation is a kangaroo but it is not a twitch does not hold if the sluicegate is not a clerestory. sent2: if something does not counterplot fumigant then it is a solvability that is intermolecular. sent3: there is something such that it is a solvability that is nondeductible. sent4: the contamination is a kangaroo. sent5: something is nondeductible and/or it is not a kind of a punishment if it is a solvability. sent6: the sluicegate is not a clerestory if the fact that the contamination is not a clerestory and/or is a Salmo is not correct. sent7: if something is a solvability and nondeductible the silverrod is intermolecular. sent8: that the contamination is not a clerestory or a Salmo or both is not correct. sent9: if something is a Labrouste the fact that it is not intermolecular and it is not nondeductible is not right. sent10: the fact that the sluicegate does undress sisterhood is correct if a maceration is a kangaroo. sent11: if the contamination is not a kind of a maceration it does counterplot fumigant and is not a kind of a kangaroo. sent12: the Hmong is not a kind of a clerestory and is not a dowser. sent13: if that something is not intermolecular and it is not nondeductible does not hold then it is a solvability. sent14: the contamination twitches if the sluicegate is a kind of a kangaroo. sent15: if the Hmong is not a kind of a clerestory then the fact that the miscegenation undresses sisterhood and it is a kind of a maceration is incorrect. sent16: something is a Labrouste if it counterplots fumigant and it is not a kangaroo. sent17: if that the silverrod is a Labrouste is not incorrect the sluicegate is a kangaroo. sent18: if something does not counterplot fumigant then it is not a kind of a clerestory. sent19: something does not counterplot fumigant if the fact that it undresses sisterhood and is a maceration is incorrect. sent20: the inkberry is not a kind of a kangaroo. sent21: if the miscegenation is not a Labrouste then the ecologist is not a Labrouste. sent22: the miscegenation does counterplot fumigant if the silverrod is intermolecular but it is not a Labrouste. sent23: if the miscegenation is a kind of a clerestory then that the Hmong counterplots fumigant is right. sent24: there exists something such that that it does not undress sisterhood and is not a kind of a maceration is false. sent25: if something is a solvability then it is not a kind of a twitch. sent26: something is not a Labrouste if that it is a kangaroo and is not a kind of a twitch is incorrect.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the silverrod is intermolecular is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the silverrod is not a kind of a Labrouste.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the silverrod is intermolecular and is not a kind of a Labrouste.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the miscegenation counterplots fumigant.; sent19 -> int4: the miscegenation does not counterplot fumigant if the fact that it does undress sisterhood and is a maceration is not correct.; sent12 -> int5: the Hmong is not a clerestory.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the miscegenation does undress sisterhood and it is a kind of a maceration is not true.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the miscegenation does not counterplot fumigant.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the silverrod is a kind of a Labrouste.; int9 & sent17 -> int10: the sluicegate is a kind of a kangaroo.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the ecologist is not a Labrouste and it is not a punishment.
sent26 -> int11: the miscegenation is not a kind of a Labrouste if that it is both a kangaroo and not a twitch is wrong.; sent6 & sent8 -> int12: the sluicegate is not a clerestory.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the miscegenation is a kind of a kangaroo but it does not twitch is not true.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the miscegenation is not a kind of a Labrouste.; sent21 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the ecologist is not a Labrouste is not wrong.; sent5 -> int16: the silverrod is not deductible and/or it is not a kind of a punishment if it is a solvability.; sent2 -> int17: if the silverrod does not counterplot fumigant it is a solvability and it is intermolecular.;
$hypothesis$ = the contamination is a twitch. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the miscegenation is a kangaroo but it is not a twitch does not hold if the sluicegate is not a clerestory. sent2: if something does not counterplot fumigant then it is a solvability that is intermolecular. sent3: there is something such that it is a solvability that is nondeductible. sent4: the contamination is a kangaroo. sent5: something is nondeductible and/or it is not a kind of a punishment if it is a solvability. sent6: the sluicegate is not a clerestory if the fact that the contamination is not a clerestory and/or is a Salmo is not correct. sent7: if something is a solvability and nondeductible the silverrod is intermolecular. sent8: that the contamination is not a clerestory or a Salmo or both is not correct. sent9: if something is a Labrouste the fact that it is not intermolecular and it is not nondeductible is not right. sent10: the fact that the sluicegate does undress sisterhood is correct if a maceration is a kangaroo. sent11: if the contamination is not a kind of a maceration it does counterplot fumigant and is not a kind of a kangaroo. sent12: the Hmong is not a kind of a clerestory and is not a dowser. sent13: if that something is not intermolecular and it is not nondeductible does not hold then it is a solvability. sent14: the contamination twitches if the sluicegate is a kind of a kangaroo. sent15: if the Hmong is not a kind of a clerestory then the fact that the miscegenation undresses sisterhood and it is a kind of a maceration is incorrect. sent16: something is a Labrouste if it counterplots fumigant and it is not a kangaroo. sent17: if that the silverrod is a Labrouste is not incorrect the sluicegate is a kangaroo. sent18: if something does not counterplot fumigant then it is not a kind of a clerestory. sent19: something does not counterplot fumigant if the fact that it undresses sisterhood and is a maceration is incorrect. sent20: the inkberry is not a kind of a kangaroo. sent21: if the miscegenation is not a Labrouste then the ecologist is not a Labrouste. sent22: the miscegenation does counterplot fumigant if the silverrod is intermolecular but it is not a Labrouste. sent23: if the miscegenation is a kind of a clerestory then that the Hmong counterplots fumigant is right. sent24: there exists something such that that it does not undress sisterhood and is not a kind of a maceration is false. sent25: if something is a solvability then it is not a kind of a twitch. sent26: something is not a Labrouste if that it is a kangaroo and is not a kind of a twitch is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the silverrod is intermolecular is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the silverrod is not a kind of a Labrouste.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the silverrod is intermolecular and is not a kind of a Labrouste.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the miscegenation counterplots fumigant.; sent19 -> int4: the miscegenation does not counterplot fumigant if the fact that it does undress sisterhood and is a maceration is not correct.; sent12 -> int5: the Hmong is not a clerestory.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the miscegenation does undress sisterhood and it is a kind of a maceration is not true.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the miscegenation does not counterplot fumigant.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the silverrod is a kind of a Labrouste.; int9 & sent17 -> int10: the sluicegate is a kind of a kangaroo.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__