that the aristocrat is fallible and it soars is false.
sent1: if the tropic is a kind of an order it is a seigniorage. sent2: that the monazite is fallible is correct. sent3: the Hanuman is centroidal. sent4: that the tropic flabbergasts saratoga or it is not a kind of a seigniorage or both is not true if it does order. sent5: if the tropic is not a soar the aristocrat is both fallible and a soar. sent6: if the pitsaw does not extinguish and is a seigniorage then the monazite is not a seigniorage. sent7: the aristocrat does soar. sent8: the tropic is not fallible if the monazite flabbergasts saratoga but it does not order. sent9: the fact that the monazite does interpret and extinguishes is not incorrect. sent10: the monazite does not interpret if the fact that the tropic does flabbergast saratoga and/or is not a kind of a seigniorage is not correct. sent11: the monazite does extinguish and does flabbergast saratoga. sent12: if the tropic interprets then it does soar. sent13: the monazite does flabbergast saratoga and it extinguishes. sent14: if the oar is a kind of a watcher then the Hanuman is a planner. sent15: if that the tropic flabbergasts saratoga and/or it is a seigniorage is not true the monazite does not interpret. sent16: if something is not a seigniorage then it flabbergasts saratoga and does not order. sent17: if the tropic is not a kind of a soar then the fact that the aristocrat soar is true. sent18: if the oar is a Hickock then the Hanuman is a kind of a planner. sent19: the tropic orders if it does soar. sent20: the oar is a watcher and/or is a Hickock. sent21: the monazite does extinguish. sent22: the tropic is a seigniorage.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tropic is a kind of a soar is not wrong.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the tropic is a kind of an order.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the tropic does flabbergast saratoga or is not a seigniorage or both does not hold.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the monazite does not interpret.; sent9 -> int4: the monazite interprets.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the tropic does not soar hold.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the aristocrat is both fallible and a soar is not right.
sent16 -> int7: the monazite does flabbergast saratoga and is not a kind of an order if it is not a seigniorage.; sent20 & sent14 & sent18 -> int8: the Hanuman is a kind of a planner.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the Hanuman is not non-centroidal and it is a planner.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a kind of centroidal thing that is a planner.;
$hypothesis$ = that the aristocrat is fallible and it soars is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tropic is a kind of an order it is a seigniorage. sent2: that the monazite is fallible is correct. sent3: the Hanuman is centroidal. sent4: that the tropic flabbergasts saratoga or it is not a kind of a seigniorage or both is not true if it does order. sent5: if the tropic is not a soar the aristocrat is both fallible and a soar. sent6: if the pitsaw does not extinguish and is a seigniorage then the monazite is not a seigniorage. sent7: the aristocrat does soar. sent8: the tropic is not fallible if the monazite flabbergasts saratoga but it does not order. sent9: the fact that the monazite does interpret and extinguishes is not incorrect. sent10: the monazite does not interpret if the fact that the tropic does flabbergast saratoga and/or is not a kind of a seigniorage is not correct. sent11: the monazite does extinguish and does flabbergast saratoga. sent12: if the tropic interprets then it does soar. sent13: the monazite does flabbergast saratoga and it extinguishes. sent14: if the oar is a kind of a watcher then the Hanuman is a planner. sent15: if that the tropic flabbergasts saratoga and/or it is a seigniorage is not true the monazite does not interpret. sent16: if something is not a seigniorage then it flabbergasts saratoga and does not order. sent17: if the tropic is not a kind of a soar then the fact that the aristocrat soar is true. sent18: if the oar is a Hickock then the Hanuman is a kind of a planner. sent19: the tropic orders if it does soar. sent20: the oar is a watcher and/or is a Hickock. sent21: the monazite does extinguish. sent22: the tropic is a seigniorage. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tropic is a kind of a soar is not wrong.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the tropic is a kind of an order.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the tropic does flabbergast saratoga or is not a seigniorage or both does not hold.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the monazite does not interpret.; sent9 -> int4: the monazite interprets.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the tropic does not soar hold.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__