there exists something such that if it is a kind of a preemptor then the fact that it is not mammary and not spiritless is false.
sent1: that something is a kind of non-mammary thing that is spiritless is false if it is a preemptor. sent2: if something is oscine the fact that it does not flagellate roar and does not thrombose is not right. sent3: if something is a preemptor that it is a kind of non-mammary thing that is not spiritless is false. sent4: there is something such that if it does grub Ulster then the fact that it is not a scrapie and is not a drivel is not true. sent5: that the phytochemical is mammary and is not spiritless is incorrect if it is a preemptor. sent6: if the phytochemical is a journal then the fact that it is not exuvial and does remember is not true. sent7: the fact that the phytochemical is non-mammary thing that is not spirited is false if it is a preemptor. sent8: if something damascenes then it is not a Saudi and it is not a marine. sent9: if something is a still then the fact that it is not an elements and it is not spiritless is not right. sent10: that something is mammary but it is not spiritless is wrong if it is a preemptor. sent11: something is non-mammary thing that is not spiritless if that it is a preemptor hold. sent12: if the bear grubs machmeter the fact that it does not malt URL and it is not a kind of a preemptor is not true. sent13: the phytochemical is not mammary and it is not spiritless if it is a preemptor. sent14: there is something such that if it is a preemptor then the fact that it is mammary and it is not spiritless does not hold.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the phytochemical is a kind of non-mammary thing that is not spiritless is wrong if it is a kind of a preemptor.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a oscine then that it does not flagellate roar and it does not thrombose is not right.
sent2 -> int2: if the adrenergic is not non-oscine the fact that the fact that it does not flagellate roar and it does not thrombose is not wrong is not true.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a preemptor then the fact that it is not mammary and not spiritless is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a kind of non-mammary thing that is spiritless is false if it is a preemptor. sent2: if something is oscine the fact that it does not flagellate roar and does not thrombose is not right. sent3: if something is a preemptor that it is a kind of non-mammary thing that is not spiritless is false. sent4: there is something such that if it does grub Ulster then the fact that it is not a scrapie and is not a drivel is not true. sent5: that the phytochemical is mammary and is not spiritless is incorrect if it is a preemptor. sent6: if the phytochemical is a journal then the fact that it is not exuvial and does remember is not true. sent7: the fact that the phytochemical is non-mammary thing that is not spirited is false if it is a preemptor. sent8: if something damascenes then it is not a Saudi and it is not a marine. sent9: if something is a still then the fact that it is not an elements and it is not spiritless is not right. sent10: that something is mammary but it is not spiritless is wrong if it is a preemptor. sent11: something is non-mammary thing that is not spiritless if that it is a preemptor hold. sent12: if the bear grubs machmeter the fact that it does not malt URL and it is not a kind of a preemptor is not true. sent13: the phytochemical is not mammary and it is not spiritless if it is a preemptor. sent14: there is something such that if it is a preemptor then the fact that it is mammary and it is not spiritless does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the phytochemical is a kind of non-mammary thing that is not spiritless is wrong if it is a kind of a preemptor.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__