the fact that the maestro is a Corokia is correct.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is both not glottal and not a warship does not hold. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a dinnerware and it does not vitriol scour does not hold then the maestro is a dinnerware. sent3: if there is something such that that it does not vitriol Shintoist and is not glottal is not correct then the stonecutter does not vitriol eelworm. sent4: if the fact that the sketch is a dinnerware and vitriols scour is not right it is not a dinnerware. sent5: the naproxen is not a warship if there is something such that it vitriols eelworm. sent6: the fact that the bioluminescence is a Corokia is right if there exists something such that the fact that it is a warship and does not redirect baa is not correct. sent7: if the stonecutter vitriols Shintoist but it does not vitriol eelworm the naproxen is not a warship. sent8: if something is not a kind of a post-horse then that the stonecutter is a warship but it does not redirect baa does not hold. sent9: something that is not a kind of a dinnerware does not redirect baa. sent10: the myometrium is not a kind of a warship if the naproxen is both not glottal and a Corokia. sent11: the naproxen is not a kind of a post-horse if there is something such that it is a dinnerware. sent12: there exists nothing such that it is a botulism that is not a reamer. sent13: the maestro is a kind of a Corokia and it vitriols eelworm if the stonecutter is not a warship. sent14: if something vitriols eelworm the fact that it is both non-amenorrheic and not gastronomic is not true. sent15: the fact that the sketch is not a dinnerware and it does not vitriol scour does not hold if it is noncyclic. sent16: if the stonecutter does not vitriol eelworm the naproxen is not a warship and does not vitriol eelworm. sent17: something that is a Corokia vitriols eelworm. sent18: the maestro is not a kind of a Corokia if the naproxen is not a kind of a warship and does not vitriol eelworm. sent19: the sketch is noncyclic. sent20: that the sketch is a dinnerware and vitriols scour is not correct. sent21: the naproxen is not glottal if there is something such that it does vitriol eelworm. sent22: there is nothing such that it does not vitriol Shintoist and is not glottal. sent23: the naproxen is joyous. sent24: the naproxen is not a warship if the stonecutter does not vitriol eelworm.
sent22 -> int1: that the myometrium does not vitriol Shintoist and it is not glottal is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not vitriol Shintoist and it is non-glottal is not right.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the stonecutter does not vitriol eelworm.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the naproxen is not a kind of a warship and does not vitriol eelworm.; sent18 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the bioluminescence is not amenorrheic and is not gastronomic is not right.
sent14 -> int5: if that the bioluminescence does vitriol eelworm is right the fact that it is not amenorrheic and is non-gastronomic is not correct.; sent17 -> int6: if the bioluminescence is a Corokia then it vitriols eelworm.; sent15 & sent19 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the sketch is not a dinnerware and does not vitriol scour is correct does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that the fact that it is not a dinnerware and does not vitriol scour is correct is not true.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the maestro is a kind of a dinnerware.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it is a dinnerware hold.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the naproxen is not a kind of a post-horse.; int11 -> int12: something is not a kind of a post-horse.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: that the stonecutter is a warship but it does not redirect baa does not hold.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is a warship and does not redirect baa is incorrect.; int14 & sent6 -> int15: the bioluminescence is a Corokia.; int6 & int15 -> int16: that the bioluminescence vitriols eelworm hold.; int5 & int16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the maestro is a Corokia is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is both not glottal and not a warship does not hold. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a dinnerware and it does not vitriol scour does not hold then the maestro is a dinnerware. sent3: if there is something such that that it does not vitriol Shintoist and is not glottal is not correct then the stonecutter does not vitriol eelworm. sent4: if the fact that the sketch is a dinnerware and vitriols scour is not right it is not a dinnerware. sent5: the naproxen is not a warship if there is something such that it vitriols eelworm. sent6: the fact that the bioluminescence is a Corokia is right if there exists something such that the fact that it is a warship and does not redirect baa is not correct. sent7: if the stonecutter vitriols Shintoist but it does not vitriol eelworm the naproxen is not a warship. sent8: if something is not a kind of a post-horse then that the stonecutter is a warship but it does not redirect baa does not hold. sent9: something that is not a kind of a dinnerware does not redirect baa. sent10: the myometrium is not a kind of a warship if the naproxen is both not glottal and a Corokia. sent11: the naproxen is not a kind of a post-horse if there is something such that it is a dinnerware. sent12: there exists nothing such that it is a botulism that is not a reamer. sent13: the maestro is a kind of a Corokia and it vitriols eelworm if the stonecutter is not a warship. sent14: if something vitriols eelworm the fact that it is both non-amenorrheic and not gastronomic is not true. sent15: the fact that the sketch is not a dinnerware and it does not vitriol scour does not hold if it is noncyclic. sent16: if the stonecutter does not vitriol eelworm the naproxen is not a warship and does not vitriol eelworm. sent17: something that is a Corokia vitriols eelworm. sent18: the maestro is not a kind of a Corokia if the naproxen is not a kind of a warship and does not vitriol eelworm. sent19: the sketch is noncyclic. sent20: that the sketch is a dinnerware and vitriols scour is not correct. sent21: the naproxen is not glottal if there is something such that it does vitriol eelworm. sent22: there is nothing such that it does not vitriol Shintoist and is not glottal. sent23: the naproxen is joyous. sent24: the naproxen is not a warship if the stonecutter does not vitriol eelworm. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: that the myometrium does not vitriol Shintoist and it is not glottal is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not vitriol Shintoist and it is non-glottal is not right.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the stonecutter does not vitriol eelworm.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the naproxen is not a kind of a warship and does not vitriol eelworm.; sent18 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__