that the Indianan is not non-pubic is not incorrect.
sent1: if there is something such that it is a Connecticuter then that the cantilever does recreate but it is not lymphatic is not true. sent2: something is pubic if it is not a microscopist and it is not a neoclassicist. sent3: if the Taiwanese is unemployable then the fingerpaint is a kind of a Connecticuter. sent4: the Indianan is not a microscopist and it is not neoclassicist if the Taiwanese is not unemployable. sent5: if that the cantilever recreates and is not lymphatic is not correct then that the letter is not optional is correct. sent6: the letter is optional and it overpays. sent7: the fact that the Indianan is not a microscopist is not wrong if that the Taiwanese is not unemployable hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Taiwanese is unemployable is not wrong.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fingerpaint is a Connecticuter.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a Connecticuter.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the cantilever does recreate and is not lymphatic is not right.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the letter is not optional.; sent6 -> int5: the letter is optional.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Taiwanese is not unemployable.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the Indianan is both not a microscopist and not neoclassicist.; sent2 -> int9: the Indianan is pubic if it is not a kind of a microscopist and it is not a kind of a neoclassicist.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Indianan is not non-pubic is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is a Connecticuter then that the cantilever does recreate but it is not lymphatic is not true. sent2: something is pubic if it is not a microscopist and it is not a neoclassicist. sent3: if the Taiwanese is unemployable then the fingerpaint is a kind of a Connecticuter. sent4: the Indianan is not a microscopist and it is not neoclassicist if the Taiwanese is not unemployable. sent5: if that the cantilever recreates and is not lymphatic is not correct then that the letter is not optional is correct. sent6: the letter is optional and it overpays. sent7: the fact that the Indianan is not a microscopist is not wrong if that the Taiwanese is not unemployable hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Taiwanese is unemployable is not wrong.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fingerpaint is a Connecticuter.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a Connecticuter.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the cantilever does recreate and is not lymphatic is not right.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the letter is not optional.; sent6 -> int5: the letter is optional.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Taiwanese is not unemployable.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the Indianan is both not a microscopist and not neoclassicist.; sent2 -> int9: the Indianan is pubic if it is not a kind of a microscopist and it is not a kind of a neoclassicist.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__