if the fact that the digestion dichotomizes hold then that the bullion does not target syrup and it does not beep maturation is incorrect.
sent1: if the pansy is not offstage the fact that the digestion does not dichotomize and is offstage is not right. sent2: the pansy is offstage if the digestion does dichotomize. sent3: the mooring does not platinize Tarsiidae if the pansy is offstage and it beeps maturation. sent4: the mooring is appellate if something is a salesgirl. sent5: the digestion platinizes Tarsiidae. sent6: that the bullion does target syrup but it does not platinize Tarsiidae is wrong if the mooring is a kind of a revival. sent7: there is something such that it is a salesgirl. sent8: if the pansy does not beep maturation then that the mooring is a revival that does not beep maturation is not right. sent9: the fact that the bullion does not target syrup and it does not beep maturation does not hold if the pansy does not beep maturation. sent10: if the bullion targets syrup that the pansy beeps maturation and is not appellate is not true. sent11: the bullion does not target syrup and it does not beep maturation. sent12: that the bullion does not target syrup but it beeps maturation is wrong if the pansy does not beeps maturation. sent13: if something is appellate it is a revival. sent14: the fact that the bullion does not target syrup and does beep maturation is not correct. sent15: something platinizes Tarsiidae if it is a revival.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the digestion does dichotomize.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the pansy is offstage.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pansy beeps maturation.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the pansy is offstage and beeps maturation.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the mooring does not platinize Tarsiidae.; sent15 -> int4: if the mooring is a revival it platinizes Tarsiidae.; sent13 -> int5: the mooring is a kind of a revival if it is appellate.; sent7 & sent4 -> int6: the mooring is appellate.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the mooring is a revival is not false.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the mooring platinizes Tarsiidae.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int9 -> int10: that the pansy does not beep maturation hold.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the fact that the fact that the bullion does not target syrup and does not beep maturation is right is false.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the digestion dichotomizes hold then that the bullion does not target syrup and it does not beep maturation is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pansy is not offstage the fact that the digestion does not dichotomize and is offstage is not right. sent2: the pansy is offstage if the digestion does dichotomize. sent3: the mooring does not platinize Tarsiidae if the pansy is offstage and it beeps maturation. sent4: the mooring is appellate if something is a salesgirl. sent5: the digestion platinizes Tarsiidae. sent6: that the bullion does target syrup but it does not platinize Tarsiidae is wrong if the mooring is a kind of a revival. sent7: there is something such that it is a salesgirl. sent8: if the pansy does not beep maturation then that the mooring is a revival that does not beep maturation is not right. sent9: the fact that the bullion does not target syrup and it does not beep maturation does not hold if the pansy does not beep maturation. sent10: if the bullion targets syrup that the pansy beeps maturation and is not appellate is not true. sent11: the bullion does not target syrup and it does not beep maturation. sent12: that the bullion does not target syrup but it beeps maturation is wrong if the pansy does not beeps maturation. sent13: if something is appellate it is a revival. sent14: the fact that the bullion does not target syrup and does beep maturation is not correct. sent15: something platinizes Tarsiidae if it is a revival. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the digestion does dichotomize.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the pansy is offstage.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pansy beeps maturation.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the pansy is offstage and beeps maturation.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the mooring does not platinize Tarsiidae.; sent15 -> int4: if the mooring is a revival it platinizes Tarsiidae.; sent13 -> int5: the mooring is a kind of a revival if it is appellate.; sent7 & sent4 -> int6: the mooring is appellate.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the mooring is a revival is not false.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the mooring platinizes Tarsiidae.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int9 -> int10: that the pansy does not beep maturation hold.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the fact that the fact that the bullion does not target syrup and does not beep maturation is right is false.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__