the preteen ridicules Petronius and it does contemn monolatry.
sent1: if the fact that that the cosmetician is autoecious and is aldehydic does not hold is not false then it does not contemn monolatry. sent2: the preteen does ridicule Petronius if the cosmetician does ridicule Petronius. sent3: if the cosmetician does not contemn monolatry then the fact that the preteen ridicules Petronius and it does contemn monolatry is incorrect. sent4: that the cosmetician is autoecious thing that is aldehydic is not correct.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the cosmetician does not contemn monolatry.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the preteen does ridicule Petronius and it does contemn monolatry.
$hypothesis$ = the preteen ridicules Petronius and it does contemn monolatry. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that that the cosmetician is autoecious and is aldehydic does not hold is not false then it does not contemn monolatry. sent2: the preteen does ridicule Petronius if the cosmetician does ridicule Petronius. sent3: if the cosmetician does not contemn monolatry then the fact that the preteen ridicules Petronius and it does contemn monolatry is incorrect. sent4: that the cosmetician is autoecious thing that is aldehydic is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the cosmetician does not contemn monolatry.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__