the clasping does not occur and the netting does not occur.
sent1: if that the non-unshapeliness and/or the association occurs does not hold then the exalting snailfish does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the wobble happens and the association happens is not true the association does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the feeding pitchfork does not occur but the clucking happens does not hold the refutation does not occur. sent4: that the rough happens results in the refutation and/or that the exalting snailfish does not occur. sent5: the unadoptableness occurs. sent6: that the consultation does not occur and the refutation does not occur is false if the roughing occurs. sent7: the demurring does not occur and the derailment happens. sent8: if the scoffing reintroduction occurs the fact that the non-unshapeliness or the association or both occurs is false. sent9: the scoffing reintroduction happens if that the frequentness does not occur and the scoffing reintroduction does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the cluck does not occur the refutation does not occur. sent11: if the self-induction occurs then that the non-unimpressionableness and/or the offensiveness happens is wrong. sent12: if the gutlessness does not occur the fact that the win does not occur and/or the consultation does not occur is incorrect. sent13: the fact that both the wobbling and the clasp occurs is wrong. sent14: the non-nettingness is triggered by that the rough does not occur and the exalting snailfish does not occur. sent15: the fact that the gutlessness does not occur is right. sent16: the consultation is prevented by that the feeding pitchfork does not occur but the clucking occurs. sent17: the association does not occur if the scoffing reintroduction happens. sent18: the utopianness does not occur. sent19: the fact that either the saturation does not occur or the garnering does not occur or both is not right if the win does not occur. sent20: the win happens and/or the consultation does not occur. sent21: the consecration does not occur if both the indigestibleness and the impressionableness happens. sent22: that the clasp does not occur and the netting does not occur is false if the winning does not occur. sent23: if the refutation does not occur then that the rough does not occur is not incorrect. sent24: the fact that both the wobbling and the association happens is not true. sent25: the defiantness is prevented by that not the nonviolentness but the enskying prod happens. sent26: the fact that either the enskying heaviness does not occur or the cornhusking occurs or both is not correct. sent27: that the frequentness does not occur and the scoffing reintroduction does not occur is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the feeding pitchfork but the clucking occurs.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the consultation does not occur.; int1 -> int2: that the winning does not occur or the consultation does not occur or both hold.; sent12 & sent15 -> int3: that that the winning does not occur and/or the consultation does not occur is true is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that not the feeding pitchfork but the clucking happens does not hold.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the refutation does not occur.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: the fact that the roughness does not occur is not wrong.; sent9 & sent27 -> int8: the scoffing reintroduction occurs.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the unshapeliness does not occur or the association happens or both is not right.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the exalting snailfish does not occur.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the roughing does not occur and the exalting snailfish does not occur.; int11 & sent14 -> int12: the nettingness does not occur.;
the fact that either the saturation does not occur or the garnering does not occur or both does not hold.
sent2 & sent24 -> int13: the association does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the clasping does not occur and the netting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the non-unshapeliness and/or the association occurs does not hold then the exalting snailfish does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the wobble happens and the association happens is not true the association does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the feeding pitchfork does not occur but the clucking happens does not hold the refutation does not occur. sent4: that the rough happens results in the refutation and/or that the exalting snailfish does not occur. sent5: the unadoptableness occurs. sent6: that the consultation does not occur and the refutation does not occur is false if the roughing occurs. sent7: the demurring does not occur and the derailment happens. sent8: if the scoffing reintroduction occurs the fact that the non-unshapeliness or the association or both occurs is false. sent9: the scoffing reintroduction happens if that the frequentness does not occur and the scoffing reintroduction does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the cluck does not occur the refutation does not occur. sent11: if the self-induction occurs then that the non-unimpressionableness and/or the offensiveness happens is wrong. sent12: if the gutlessness does not occur the fact that the win does not occur and/or the consultation does not occur is incorrect. sent13: the fact that both the wobbling and the clasp occurs is wrong. sent14: the non-nettingness is triggered by that the rough does not occur and the exalting snailfish does not occur. sent15: the fact that the gutlessness does not occur is right. sent16: the consultation is prevented by that the feeding pitchfork does not occur but the clucking occurs. sent17: the association does not occur if the scoffing reintroduction happens. sent18: the utopianness does not occur. sent19: the fact that either the saturation does not occur or the garnering does not occur or both is not right if the win does not occur. sent20: the win happens and/or the consultation does not occur. sent21: the consecration does not occur if both the indigestibleness and the impressionableness happens. sent22: that the clasp does not occur and the netting does not occur is false if the winning does not occur. sent23: if the refutation does not occur then that the rough does not occur is not incorrect. sent24: the fact that both the wobbling and the association happens is not true. sent25: the defiantness is prevented by that not the nonviolentness but the enskying prod happens. sent26: the fact that either the enskying heaviness does not occur or the cornhusking occurs or both is not correct. sent27: that the frequentness does not occur and the scoffing reintroduction does not occur is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the feeding pitchfork but the clucking occurs.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the consultation does not occur.; int1 -> int2: that the winning does not occur or the consultation does not occur or both hold.; sent12 & sent15 -> int3: that that the winning does not occur and/or the consultation does not occur is true is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that not the feeding pitchfork but the clucking happens does not hold.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the refutation does not occur.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: the fact that the roughness does not occur is not wrong.; sent9 & sent27 -> int8: the scoffing reintroduction occurs.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the unshapeliness does not occur or the association happens or both is not right.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the exalting snailfish does not occur.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the roughing does not occur and the exalting snailfish does not occur.; int11 & sent14 -> int12: the nettingness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__