the Bhutanese is both a Florence and a purdah.
sent1: the anticipator does not complect amnion and/or does not complect Ciconiidae if something does defoliate instrumentality. sent2: the anticipator does not complect amnion and/or it does complect Ciconiidae. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not glom suffragan and it does glom logicality is wrong the Bhutanese does glom suffragan. sent4: if something does glom suffragan it is a purdah. sent5: that the benzocaine does not glom logicality and is not a get does not hold if it is a kind of a bag. sent6: either the anticipator does not complect amnion or it does complect Ciconiidae or both if there exists something such that it defoliates instrumentality. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it does defoliate instrumentality is not wrong. sent8: the anticipator complects Ciconiidae if something does glom logicality and it does glom suffragan. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not glom suffragan and does glom logicality does not hold. sent10: the fact that something is a Florence and it is a purdah is wrong if it does not defoliate instrumentality. sent11: there exists something such that it does not glom suffragan and it does glom logicality. sent12: the fact that the instrumentality is not nonretractile but it is a bag does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the benzocaine does not glom logicality and is not a get is incorrect it does glom logicality. sent14: if that the instrumentality is both not nonretractile and a bag is false then the benzocaine bag. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it gloms suffragan and it does glom logicality does not hold. sent16: the inverter is visible. sent17: the Bhutanese does glom suffragan if something does not glom logicality.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the anticipator does not complect amnion or does not complect Ciconiidae or both.; sent4 -> int2: if the fact that the Bhutanese does glom suffragan is right then it is a purdah.; sent9 & sent3 -> int3: the Bhutanese does glom suffragan.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Bhutanese is a kind of a purdah.;
the fact that the Bhutanese is a kind of a Florence that is a purdah is incorrect.
sent10 -> int5: that the Bhutanese is a Florence and it is a purdah does not hold if it does not defoliate instrumentality.; sent14 & sent12 -> int6: the benzocaine does bag.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: that the benzocaine does not glom logicality and it is not a kind of a get is not correct.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the benzocaine gloms logicality.; sent16 -> int9: there is something such that that it is not invisible is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the Bhutanese is both a Florence and a purdah. ; $context$ = sent1: the anticipator does not complect amnion and/or does not complect Ciconiidae if something does defoliate instrumentality. sent2: the anticipator does not complect amnion and/or it does complect Ciconiidae. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not glom suffragan and it does glom logicality is wrong the Bhutanese does glom suffragan. sent4: if something does glom suffragan it is a purdah. sent5: that the benzocaine does not glom logicality and is not a get does not hold if it is a kind of a bag. sent6: either the anticipator does not complect amnion or it does complect Ciconiidae or both if there exists something such that it defoliates instrumentality. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it does defoliate instrumentality is not wrong. sent8: the anticipator complects Ciconiidae if something does glom logicality and it does glom suffragan. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not glom suffragan and does glom logicality does not hold. sent10: the fact that something is a Florence and it is a purdah is wrong if it does not defoliate instrumentality. sent11: there exists something such that it does not glom suffragan and it does glom logicality. sent12: the fact that the instrumentality is not nonretractile but it is a bag does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the benzocaine does not glom logicality and is not a get is incorrect it does glom logicality. sent14: if that the instrumentality is both not nonretractile and a bag is false then the benzocaine bag. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it gloms suffragan and it does glom logicality does not hold. sent16: the inverter is visible. sent17: the Bhutanese does glom suffragan if something does not glom logicality. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the anticipator does not complect amnion or does not complect Ciconiidae or both.; sent4 -> int2: if the fact that the Bhutanese does glom suffragan is right then it is a purdah.; sent9 & sent3 -> int3: the Bhutanese does glom suffragan.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Bhutanese is a kind of a purdah.; __UNKNOWN__