the fact that there exists something such that if it does qualify probable and it is an irregular then it does not qualify manul is false.
sent1: the probable does qualify manul if it qualifies probable and it is a kind of an irregular. sent2: there exists something such that if it qualifies probable and it is an irregular it does qualify manul. sent3: if something does crossbreed diol and it does crossbreed quadric it is not a worse. sent4: if something that does qualify probable is irregular then it does not qualify manul. sent5: the myrmecophyte is not a kind of a tactlessness if it is a kind of a breakage and it stinks zymology.
sent4 -> int1: if the probable qualifies probable and is an irregular it does not qualify manul.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does qualify probable and it is an irregular then it does not qualify manul is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the probable does qualify manul if it qualifies probable and it is a kind of an irregular. sent2: there exists something such that if it qualifies probable and it is an irregular it does qualify manul. sent3: if something does crossbreed diol and it does crossbreed quadric it is not a worse. sent4: if something that does qualify probable is irregular then it does not qualify manul. sent5: the myrmecophyte is not a kind of a tactlessness if it is a kind of a breakage and it stinks zymology. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the probable qualifies probable and is an irregular it does not qualify manul.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__