that the Goliath does not capsule watercress and is wearable does not hold.
sent1: something does not uncover if that it uncover and it is not a gracefulness is not correct. sent2: if the endocrine does not uncover then the jargoon does not uncover or does not detail pargeting or both. sent3: that the jargoon details pargeting hold if the motion is not a spot. sent4: the acanthocephalan is a kind of a gracefulness if that the endocrine does not uncover but it does clangor jargoon is wrong. sent5: if the fact that the mascarpone details lecithin or it is not a moll or both is not correct then the scut is not wearable. sent6: the fact that if the scut is not wearable the fact that the fact that the Goliath does not capsule watercress but it is wearable hold is false is not false. sent7: if the acanthocephalan does not jump the fact that the mascarpone details lecithin and/or it is not a kind of a moll is not true. sent8: the jargoon does not uncover and/or is wearable. sent9: something is not a jump if it is a gracefulness. sent10: the motion does not spot. sent11: if the acanthocephalan is not a jump then the mascarpone is a moll. sent12: if the fact that the motion does not spot is true that either the jargoon does not uncover or it does not detail pargeting or both is wrong. sent13: the scut does not capsule watercress. sent14: the jargoon either does not uncover or does detail pargeting or both. sent15: that the jargoon is a jump but it does not detail pargeting is wrong if the acanthocephalan does detail lecithin. sent16: if something does not uncover it does not capsule watercress and is wearable. sent17: the mascarpone is a moll. sent18: if something does clangor jargoon then that it uncovers and it is not a kind of a gracefulness is not right. sent19: the jargoon does detail pargeting. sent20: if the jargoon does not capsule watercress then the Goliath uncovers. sent21: the fact that the endocrine uncovers and details pargeting does not hold if the fact that the jargoon does not details pargeting is not false. sent22: if that the jargoon does jump but it does not detail pargeting is not correct then the endocrine does detail pargeting. sent23: the endocrine is not a kind of a patrol.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the endocrine does not uncover and does clangor jargoon.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the endocrine does not uncover is not wrong.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the jargoon does not uncover and/or it does not detail pargeting.; sent12 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that either the jargoon does not uncover or it does not detail pargeting or both does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the endocrine does not uncover but it clangors jargoon is wrong.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the acanthocephalan is a gracefulness.; sent9 -> int7: the acanthocephalan is not a jump if it is a kind of a gracefulness.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the acanthocephalan is not a jump.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: that the mascarpone either does detail lecithin or is not a moll or both does not hold.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the scut is not wearable.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the Goliath does not capsule watercress and is wearable.
sent16 -> int11: the Goliath does not capsule watercress but it is wearable if it does not uncover.; sent1 -> int12: that the Goliath does not uncover is not incorrect if that it does uncover and is not a gracefulness is incorrect.; sent18 -> int13: that the Goliath does uncover but it is not a gracefulness is not right if it clangors jargoon.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Goliath does not capsule watercress and is wearable does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not uncover if that it uncover and it is not a gracefulness is not correct. sent2: if the endocrine does not uncover then the jargoon does not uncover or does not detail pargeting or both. sent3: that the jargoon details pargeting hold if the motion is not a spot. sent4: the acanthocephalan is a kind of a gracefulness if that the endocrine does not uncover but it does clangor jargoon is wrong. sent5: if the fact that the mascarpone details lecithin or it is not a moll or both is not correct then the scut is not wearable. sent6: the fact that if the scut is not wearable the fact that the fact that the Goliath does not capsule watercress but it is wearable hold is false is not false. sent7: if the acanthocephalan does not jump the fact that the mascarpone details lecithin and/or it is not a kind of a moll is not true. sent8: the jargoon does not uncover and/or is wearable. sent9: something is not a jump if it is a gracefulness. sent10: the motion does not spot. sent11: if the acanthocephalan is not a jump then the mascarpone is a moll. sent12: if the fact that the motion does not spot is true that either the jargoon does not uncover or it does not detail pargeting or both is wrong. sent13: the scut does not capsule watercress. sent14: the jargoon either does not uncover or does detail pargeting or both. sent15: that the jargoon is a jump but it does not detail pargeting is wrong if the acanthocephalan does detail lecithin. sent16: if something does not uncover it does not capsule watercress and is wearable. sent17: the mascarpone is a moll. sent18: if something does clangor jargoon then that it uncovers and it is not a kind of a gracefulness is not right. sent19: the jargoon does detail pargeting. sent20: if the jargoon does not capsule watercress then the Goliath uncovers. sent21: the fact that the endocrine uncovers and details pargeting does not hold if the fact that the jargoon does not details pargeting is not false. sent22: if that the jargoon does jump but it does not detail pargeting is not correct then the endocrine does detail pargeting. sent23: the endocrine is not a kind of a patrol. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the endocrine does not uncover and does clangor jargoon.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the endocrine does not uncover is not wrong.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the jargoon does not uncover and/or it does not detail pargeting.; sent12 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that either the jargoon does not uncover or it does not detail pargeting or both does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the endocrine does not uncover but it clangors jargoon is wrong.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the acanthocephalan is a gracefulness.; sent9 -> int7: the acanthocephalan is not a jump if it is a kind of a gracefulness.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the acanthocephalan is not a jump.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: that the mascarpone either does detail lecithin or is not a moll or both does not hold.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the scut is not wearable.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__