something is both a luminosity and not a sene.
sent1: if the futon does not disrespect cytogeneticist then the Espagnole does not disrespect cytogeneticist. sent2: that the Espagnole disrespects cytogeneticist and it is ratty is false. sent3: the cytogeneticist is not a sene if the roman is an airline that is not ratty. sent4: the roman is an airline if something that is not esophageal dusks blackout. sent5: if there is something such that it is a comparison the Sclerotium is not esophageal but it dusks blackout. sent6: if the fact that the Espagnole does disrespect cytogeneticist and it is ratty is not correct then it is not ratty. sent7: if the futon is not a luminosity then the cytogeneticist is not a kind of a luminosity. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a comparison is correct. sent9: if the Espagnole is non-ratty then the roman is not non-ratty. sent10: the futon is both a luminosity and not a sene if the cytogeneticist is not a kind of a sene.
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the Sclerotium is non-esophageal thing that does dusk blackout.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not esophageal and does dusk blackout.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the roman is an airline is not false.; sent6 & sent2 -> int4: the Espagnole is not ratty.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the roman is not ratty.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the roman is an airline but it is not ratty.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the cytogeneticist is not a sene.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the futon is a luminosity but it is not a sene is not false.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = something is both a luminosity and not a sene. ; $context$ = sent1: if the futon does not disrespect cytogeneticist then the Espagnole does not disrespect cytogeneticist. sent2: that the Espagnole disrespects cytogeneticist and it is ratty is false. sent3: the cytogeneticist is not a sene if the roman is an airline that is not ratty. sent4: the roman is an airline if something that is not esophageal dusks blackout. sent5: if there is something such that it is a comparison the Sclerotium is not esophageal but it dusks blackout. sent6: if the fact that the Espagnole does disrespect cytogeneticist and it is ratty is not correct then it is not ratty. sent7: if the futon is not a luminosity then the cytogeneticist is not a kind of a luminosity. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a comparison is correct. sent9: if the Espagnole is non-ratty then the roman is not non-ratty. sent10: the futon is both a luminosity and not a sene if the cytogeneticist is not a kind of a sene. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the Sclerotium is non-esophageal thing that does dusk blackout.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not esophageal and does dusk blackout.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the roman is an airline is not false.; sent6 & sent2 -> int4: the Espagnole is not ratty.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the roman is not ratty.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the roman is an airline but it is not ratty.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the cytogeneticist is not a sene.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the futon is a luminosity but it is not a sene is not false.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__