the synthesizing colonic does not occur and the dextrorotation does not occur.
sent1: the existentness does not occur if both the derring-do and the delusion occurs. sent2: that the subscription but not the delusion occurs does not hold. sent3: the derring-do happens if the synthesizing colonic occurs. sent4: the existentness and the loopiness happens. sent5: the dextrorotation does not occur and the electrolyticness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the synthesizing colonic occurs is true.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the derring-do occurs.; sent4 -> int2: the existentness occurs.; sent5 -> int3: that the dextrorotation does not occur is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the synthesizing colonic does not occur and the dextrorotation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the existentness does not occur if both the derring-do and the delusion occurs. sent2: that the subscription but not the delusion occurs does not hold. sent3: the derring-do happens if the synthesizing colonic occurs. sent4: the existentness and the loopiness happens. sent5: the dextrorotation does not occur and the electrolyticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the synthesizing colonic occurs is true.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the derring-do occurs.; sent4 -> int2: the existentness occurs.; sent5 -> int3: that the dextrorotation does not occur is correct.; __UNKNOWN__