the fact that the seaborgium does wreck if the mutilator is a kind of a Bantu does not hold.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a chaffinch then the seaborgium is non-Bantu. sent2: the fact that the goosefoot does not beggar ology and it is not relevant is not true. sent3: the musculature represses mutilator or is not a wreck or both if the rung does not moo. sent4: the musculature is a moo. sent5: if that the goosefoot does not beggar ology and it is not relevant is wrong then it is a chaffinch. sent6: the mutilator is not a kind of a moo. sent7: something is a moo but it is not a camera if it is a tapered. sent8: if there are non-Bantu things then the mutilator is not non-calceolate. sent9: that the lingerie broods and is not a tapered hold. sent10: the fact that something does not moo is not false. sent11: if the fact that the musculature represses mutilator and/or is not a wreck is not false the fact that the mutilator does not represses mutilator hold. sent12: there is something such that it is a Bantu and it is a moo. sent13: the seaborgium is a kind of a tapered if the musculature does not wreck. sent14: the derelict is not a kind of a Polo if either it does not repress Thurber or it does hog antlered or both. sent15: if the musculature is not a wreck then the seaborgium tapers and it is a wreck. sent16: the musculature is not a wreck if something is both a Bantu and not a moo. sent17: the derelict does not repress Thurber or it does hog antlered or both. sent18: that the rung is not a moo is correct if the Herr is a moo that is not a kind of a camera.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mutilator is a Bantu.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the mutilator is a Bantu but it does not moo.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a Bantu but it is not a kind of a moo.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the musculature does not wreck.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the seaborgium tapers and it is a wreck.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the seaborgium is a kind of a wreck is not wrong.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
something is calceolate but it does not repress mutilator.
sent5 & sent2 -> int6: the goosefoot is a chaffinch.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a chaffinch.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the seaborgium is not Bantu.; int8 -> int9: the fact that there is something such that it is not a Bantu is correct.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: that the mutilator is calceolate is right.; sent7 -> int11: the fact that if the fact that the Herr is the tapered hold the Herr does moo but it is not a kind of a camera is not wrong.; sent14 & sent17 -> int12: the derelict is not a Polo.; int12 -> int13: that there exists something such that it is not a Polo hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the seaborgium does wreck if the mutilator is a kind of a Bantu does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a chaffinch then the seaborgium is non-Bantu. sent2: the fact that the goosefoot does not beggar ology and it is not relevant is not true. sent3: the musculature represses mutilator or is not a wreck or both if the rung does not moo. sent4: the musculature is a moo. sent5: if that the goosefoot does not beggar ology and it is not relevant is wrong then it is a chaffinch. sent6: the mutilator is not a kind of a moo. sent7: something is a moo but it is not a camera if it is a tapered. sent8: if there are non-Bantu things then the mutilator is not non-calceolate. sent9: that the lingerie broods and is not a tapered hold. sent10: the fact that something does not moo is not false. sent11: if the fact that the musculature represses mutilator and/or is not a wreck is not false the fact that the mutilator does not represses mutilator hold. sent12: there is something such that it is a Bantu and it is a moo. sent13: the seaborgium is a kind of a tapered if the musculature does not wreck. sent14: the derelict is not a kind of a Polo if either it does not repress Thurber or it does hog antlered or both. sent15: if the musculature is not a wreck then the seaborgium tapers and it is a wreck. sent16: the musculature is not a wreck if something is both a Bantu and not a moo. sent17: the derelict does not repress Thurber or it does hog antlered or both. sent18: that the rung is not a moo is correct if the Herr is a moo that is not a kind of a camera. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mutilator is a Bantu.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the mutilator is a Bantu but it does not moo.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a Bantu but it is not a kind of a moo.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the musculature does not wreck.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the seaborgium tapers and it is a wreck.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the seaborgium is a kind of a wreck is not wrong.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__