there is something such that if it does not denationalize willet then the fact that it is handless and it is bacteriolytic is not true.
sent1: that the willet is handless and bacteriolytic does not hold if it denationalizes willet. sent2: if something denationalizes willet the fact that it is not handed and not non-bacteriolytic is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does not grind funrun is not false the fact that it grinds hotspur and it is a kind of a precedence hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not pistillate then the fact that it is reticulate and omnivorous is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if it denationalizes willet that it is both handless and bacteriolytic is not true. sent6: the willet does denationalize willet and is a overstrain if it is not a cashmere. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Tabriz the fact that it is apocryphal and is stainable does not hold. sent8: something is handless and not non-bacteriolytic if it does not denationalize willet. sent9: if the willet does not conscript fire-on-the-mountain then the fact that it is handless and it is innumerate is false.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not denationalize willet then the fact that it is handless and it is bacteriolytic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the willet is handless and bacteriolytic does not hold if it denationalizes willet. sent2: if something denationalizes willet the fact that it is not handed and not non-bacteriolytic is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does not grind funrun is not false the fact that it grinds hotspur and it is a kind of a precedence hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not pistillate then the fact that it is reticulate and omnivorous is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if it denationalizes willet that it is both handless and bacteriolytic is not true. sent6: the willet does denationalize willet and is a overstrain if it is not a cashmere. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Tabriz the fact that it is apocryphal and is stainable does not hold. sent8: something is handless and not non-bacteriolytic if it does not denationalize willet. sent9: if the willet does not conscript fire-on-the-mountain then the fact that it is handless and it is innumerate is false. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__