the washer is not a crayfish.
sent1: if the decapod fleshes the mackle is a HS2 and does not configure acquisitiveness. sent2: something is not beautiful and it is not a crimp. sent3: the break is a masochism if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not fallible and not a masochism is not incorrect is not right. sent4: there is something such that it is not a crayfish. sent5: the washer is not a crayfish if there exists something such that it is non-tractable thing that is not connotative. sent6: if the fact that something is non-beautiful and it is not psychometric is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Aladdin. sent7: the tease is maleficent if it corsets grove. sent8: that the tease does corset grove is correct. sent9: the washer is intractable. sent10: if the fact that the tease is not uncomplimentary and not a clinodactyly is incorrect the rainstorm is not uncomplimentary. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is a adjuration and/or it is not unworldly does not hold the appliance does extravasate. sent12: the fact that the opening is a adjuration and/or it is not unworldly is false if the rainstorm is not uncomplimentary. sent13: something is a kind of a flesh and it is reactive if it is not a Aladdin. sent14: if something that is not a crayfish is not connotative the fact that the prochlorperazine is intractable is not incorrect. sent15: if the appliance does extravasate then that the jezebel is not fallible and it is not a masochism is wrong. sent16: if something is maleficent the fact that it is a kind of complimentary thing that is not a clinodactyly does not hold. sent17: if the mackle is a HS2 but it does not configure acquisitiveness the washer is a kind of a crayfish. sent18: if the passing is a flesh the decapod is a kind of a flesh.
the washer is a crayfish.
sent13 -> int1: the passing is a flesh that is reactive if it is not a kind of a Aladdin.; sent6 -> int2: the passing is not a Aladdin if that it is not beautiful and is not psychometric is incorrect.; sent16 -> int3: the fact that the tease is not uncomplimentary and it is not a kind of a clinodactyly is not correct if it is maleficent.; sent7 & sent8 -> int4: the tease is maleficent.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the tease is both not uncomplimentary and not a clinodactyly does not hold.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the rainstorm is not uncomplimentary.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the fact that that the opening is a adjuration and/or is not unworldly hold is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is either a adjuration or not unworldly or both is wrong.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the appliance extravasates.; sent15 & int9 -> int10: that the jezebel is not fallible and it is not a masochism does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it is not fallible and not a masochism is not true.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the break is a masochism.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is a masochism.;
$hypothesis$ = the washer is not a crayfish. ; $context$ = sent1: if the decapod fleshes the mackle is a HS2 and does not configure acquisitiveness. sent2: something is not beautiful and it is not a crimp. sent3: the break is a masochism if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not fallible and not a masochism is not incorrect is not right. sent4: there is something such that it is not a crayfish. sent5: the washer is not a crayfish if there exists something such that it is non-tractable thing that is not connotative. sent6: if the fact that something is non-beautiful and it is not psychometric is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Aladdin. sent7: the tease is maleficent if it corsets grove. sent8: that the tease does corset grove is correct. sent9: the washer is intractable. sent10: if the fact that the tease is not uncomplimentary and not a clinodactyly is incorrect the rainstorm is not uncomplimentary. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is a adjuration and/or it is not unworldly does not hold the appliance does extravasate. sent12: the fact that the opening is a adjuration and/or it is not unworldly is false if the rainstorm is not uncomplimentary. sent13: something is a kind of a flesh and it is reactive if it is not a Aladdin. sent14: if something that is not a crayfish is not connotative the fact that the prochlorperazine is intractable is not incorrect. sent15: if the appliance does extravasate then that the jezebel is not fallible and it is not a masochism is wrong. sent16: if something is maleficent the fact that it is a kind of complimentary thing that is not a clinodactyly does not hold. sent17: if the mackle is a HS2 but it does not configure acquisitiveness the washer is a kind of a crayfish. sent18: if the passing is a flesh the decapod is a kind of a flesh. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__