there exists something such that if it is a bus that it does tell and is not a hilum is incorrect.
sent1: if the paynim is a bus then that it tells and is a hilum does not hold. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Kislev that it is Donnean thing that is not visible is incorrect is not incorrect. sent3: if the paynim is malarial then it does tell and it is not a hymeneal. sent4: there is something such that if it buses it tells and is not a hilum. sent5: if the paynim is forceless it does lace paynim and it does not tell. sent6: if something is a canalization then the fact that it does lace gal and is interlinear does not hold. sent7: the fact that the fact that something tells and it is a hilum is not incorrect does not hold if it is a kind of a bus. sent8: if something is not non-flatness then it is a IW and it is not tasteful. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of a hilum and does not lace mill is false if it concretizes cupule. sent10: if the paynim does descry gowned that it does descry Tragulidae and it does bus is wrong. sent11: if the paynim is a bus then it tells and is not a kind of a hilum. sent12: there exists something such that if it is bisontine that it is biologistic and it is not tensile is false. sent13: the paynim is an inducement but it is not cloudy if the fact that it is a Bathyergidae is true.
if the diapir does concretize cupule that it is a hilum that does not lace mill is not right.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a bus that it does tell and is not a hilum is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the paynim is a bus then that it tells and is a hilum does not hold. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Kislev that it is Donnean thing that is not visible is incorrect is not incorrect. sent3: if the paynim is malarial then it does tell and it is not a hymeneal. sent4: there is something such that if it buses it tells and is not a hilum. sent5: if the paynim is forceless it does lace paynim and it does not tell. sent6: if something is a canalization then the fact that it does lace gal and is interlinear does not hold. sent7: the fact that the fact that something tells and it is a hilum is not incorrect does not hold if it is a kind of a bus. sent8: if something is not non-flatness then it is a IW and it is not tasteful. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of a hilum and does not lace mill is false if it concretizes cupule. sent10: if the paynim does descry gowned that it does descry Tragulidae and it does bus is wrong. sent11: if the paynim is a bus then it tells and is not a kind of a hilum. sent12: there exists something such that if it is bisontine that it is biologistic and it is not tensile is false. sent13: the paynim is an inducement but it is not cloudy if the fact that it is a Bathyergidae is true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__