if that the bregma stages dominion and is not non-graphic is not true the cyclone does not fry telomerase.
sent1: the student is indiscreet or it forms or both. sent2: the student is indiscreet and/or it does not form if that the spinster is not agrobiologic hold. sent3: if the fact that the student does fry telomerase and it stages dominion is wrong the cyclone is not indiscreet. sent4: if either the student is indiscreet or it is not a form or both then the cyclone does not fry telomerase. sent5: if the bregma stages dominion and it is a graphic the cyclone does not fry telomerase. sent6: that the globin is controversial and it lathers foreman is false. sent7: the cyclone is not a form. sent8: the cyclone does not stage dominion if the fact that the student does fry telomerase and does form is not true. sent9: the fact that the cyclone does not fry telomerase is correct if the fact that the bregma does not stage dominion hold. sent10: either the student is indiscreet or it is a form or both if the spinster is not agrobiologic. sent11: the cyclone does not fry telomerase if the student is not a form. sent12: the student is not a graphic if the fact that the bregma does stage dominion and it is indiscreet is not right. sent13: if the spinster does fry telomerase and/or it is not indiscreet then the student is not agrobiologic. sent14: the cyclone fries telomerase if that the bregma does stage dominion and is a graphic is not true. sent15: the cyclone fries telomerase if the student is indiscreet and/or it is not a form. sent16: the spinster is not agrobiologic if that the bregma does not stage dominion is correct.
$hypothesis$ = if that the bregma stages dominion and is not non-graphic is not true the cyclone does not fry telomerase. ; $context$ = sent1: the student is indiscreet or it forms or both. sent2: the student is indiscreet and/or it does not form if that the spinster is not agrobiologic hold. sent3: if the fact that the student does fry telomerase and it stages dominion is wrong the cyclone is not indiscreet. sent4: if either the student is indiscreet or it is not a form or both then the cyclone does not fry telomerase. sent5: if the bregma stages dominion and it is a graphic the cyclone does not fry telomerase. sent6: that the globin is controversial and it lathers foreman is false. sent7: the cyclone is not a form. sent8: the cyclone does not stage dominion if the fact that the student does fry telomerase and does form is not true. sent9: the fact that the cyclone does not fry telomerase is correct if the fact that the bregma does not stage dominion hold. sent10: either the student is indiscreet or it is a form or both if the spinster is not agrobiologic. sent11: the cyclone does not fry telomerase if the student is not a form. sent12: the student is not a graphic if the fact that the bregma does stage dominion and it is indiscreet is not right. sent13: if the spinster does fry telomerase and/or it is not indiscreet then the student is not agrobiologic. sent14: the cyclone fries telomerase if that the bregma does stage dominion and is a graphic is not true. sent15: the cyclone fries telomerase if the student is indiscreet and/or it is not a form. sent16: the spinster is not agrobiologic if that the bregma does not stage dominion is correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__