the toucanet is not a externalization.
sent1: if the swan is a externalization then the toucanet is a kind of a externalization. sent2: that something is not a constituency but it is a kind of a bran is false if it is seminiferous. sent3: the knout is not an address and is a mesophyte if the swan is not a position. sent4: if the swan is a constituency then the demagogue is seminiferous. sent5: something is a externalization and does impact Hephaestus if it is not an eland. sent6: something is a constituency if the fact that it does position hold. sent7: the fact that the mill-girl is not a kind of a fibrillation and is not a bran is wrong if there exists something such that it is a fibrillation. sent8: if the fact that something is not a fibrillation and not a bran is false it is a bran. sent9: if that the mill-girl is not a constituency but it is a bran is not correct the knout is a kind of a position. sent10: if the demagogue is not a position but a constituency the swan is not seminiferous. sent11: if the knout does not address but it is a kind of a mesophyte the mill-girl is not a bran. sent12: if the demagogue impacts Hephaestus and/or it is seminiferous the toucanet is not a externalization. sent13: the demagogue is not seminiferous if there exists something such that it does impact Hephaestus. sent14: the mill-girl is seminiferous if the demagogue is not seminiferous. sent15: there exists something such that that it is a fibrillation is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the swan does not position is not false.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the knout does not address but it is a kind of a mesophyte.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the mill-girl is not a bran.; sent8 -> int3: if that the mill-girl is not a kind of a fibrillation and is not a kind of a bran is wrong then it is a bran.; sent15 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the mill-girl is not a fibrillation and not a bran is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mill-girl is a bran.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the swan is a kind of a position hold.; sent6 -> int8: if the swan is a position it is a constituency.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the swan is a constituency.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the demagogue is seminiferous.; int10 -> int11: the demagogue impacts Hephaestus or it is seminiferous or both.; int11 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the swan is not a kind of a diplomacy but it does activate Ra.
sent2 -> int12: that the fact that the mill-girl is both not a constituency and a bran does not hold is correct if it is seminiferous.; sent5 -> int13: if the bicarbonate is not a kind of an eland it is a externalization and does impact Hephaestus.;
$hypothesis$ = the toucanet is not a externalization. ; $context$ = sent1: if the swan is a externalization then the toucanet is a kind of a externalization. sent2: that something is not a constituency but it is a kind of a bran is false if it is seminiferous. sent3: the knout is not an address and is a mesophyte if the swan is not a position. sent4: if the swan is a constituency then the demagogue is seminiferous. sent5: something is a externalization and does impact Hephaestus if it is not an eland. sent6: something is a constituency if the fact that it does position hold. sent7: the fact that the mill-girl is not a kind of a fibrillation and is not a bran is wrong if there exists something such that it is a fibrillation. sent8: if the fact that something is not a fibrillation and not a bran is false it is a bran. sent9: if that the mill-girl is not a constituency but it is a bran is not correct the knout is a kind of a position. sent10: if the demagogue is not a position but a constituency the swan is not seminiferous. sent11: if the knout does not address but it is a kind of a mesophyte the mill-girl is not a bran. sent12: if the demagogue impacts Hephaestus and/or it is seminiferous the toucanet is not a externalization. sent13: the demagogue is not seminiferous if there exists something such that it does impact Hephaestus. sent14: the mill-girl is seminiferous if the demagogue is not seminiferous. sent15: there exists something such that that it is a fibrillation is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the swan does not position is not false.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the knout does not address but it is a kind of a mesophyte.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the mill-girl is not a bran.; sent8 -> int3: if that the mill-girl is not a kind of a fibrillation and is not a kind of a bran is wrong then it is a bran.; sent15 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the mill-girl is not a fibrillation and not a bran is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mill-girl is a bran.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the swan is a kind of a position hold.; sent6 -> int8: if the swan is a position it is a constituency.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the swan is a constituency.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the demagogue is seminiferous.; int10 -> int11: the demagogue impacts Hephaestus or it is seminiferous or both.; int11 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__