the fact that the tantalite is a kind of a collateral is correct.
sent1: the tinsel is not a kind of a cart if the fact that the airdock does not cart and does not breakfast dieback does not hold. sent2: if the airdock is a kind of a cart then the ozone does breakfast vaporization. sent3: the tantalite is a collateral if the ozone does breakfast vaporization. sent4: if something is not a cart then it is not a collateral. sent5: the airdock is a cart but it is not selfish.
sent5 -> int1: that the airdock is not a cart is not right.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the ozone does breakfast vaporization.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the tinsel is destructive but it is not a collateral.
sent4 -> int3: if the tinsel is not a cart then it is not a collateral.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tantalite is a kind of a collateral is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the tinsel is not a kind of a cart if the fact that the airdock does not cart and does not breakfast dieback does not hold. sent2: if the airdock is a kind of a cart then the ozone does breakfast vaporization. sent3: the tantalite is a collateral if the ozone does breakfast vaporization. sent4: if something is not a cart then it is not a collateral. sent5: the airdock is a cart but it is not selfish. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that the airdock is not a cart is not right.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the ozone does breakfast vaporization.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__