that that there exists something such that if it casts flintstone it does personify and/or it is not astrocytic is not wrong is not true.
sent1: something that personifies and/or is not astrocytic does not cast flintstone. sent2: the bronze is a kind of a shaft or it does not personify or both if it is retroactive. sent3: if either the foundress personifies or it is not astrocytic or both then it does not cast flintstone. sent4: if the foundress does cast flintstone it personifies and/or is astrocytic. sent5: if the fact that something is a Miller and it does cast flintstone is not correct then it is not a Miller. sent6: the foundress does not personify. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is a turquoise and it scouts is not true the debacle is not penetrable. sent8: if that something does personify and/or is astrocytic does not hold it does not cast flintstone. sent9: if the marocain is not a kind of a Miller either the hatchway is autocatalytic or it does not personify or both. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of a Miller and does cast flintstone is wrong if it is not bibliographic. sent11: that either the marmot is not a Atlantic or it is a kind of a duplicate or both is incorrect if there exists something such that it is not penetrable. sent12: the foundress does not cast flintstone if that it personifies and/or it is astrocytic is not right. sent13: the fact that the spurge is a turquoise and it does scout does not hold. sent14: something does not cast flintstone if that it either does personify or is not astrocytic or both is false.
sent14 -> int1: the foundress does not cast flintstone if that it does personify or is not astrocytic or both is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the foundress personifies and/or is not astrocytic is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the foundress does not cast flintstone.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the foundress casts flintstone.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the foundress does personify and/or it is not astrocytic is not wrong.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the foundress personifies and/or is not astrocytic if it does cast flintstone.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the hatchway is not non-autocatalytic and/or it does not personify.
sent5 -> int6: if the fact that the marocain is a Miller that does cast flintstone does not hold it is not a Miller.; sent10 -> int7: that the marocain is a kind of a Miller and it casts flintstone does not hold if it is not bibliographic.; sent13 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is both a turquoise and a scout does not hold.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the debacle is not penetrable.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not penetrable.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the fact that either the marmot is not Atlantic or it does duplicate or both is not correct.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that either it is not a Atlantic or it is a duplicate or both is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that that there exists something such that if it casts flintstone it does personify and/or it is not astrocytic is not wrong is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something that personifies and/or is not astrocytic does not cast flintstone. sent2: the bronze is a kind of a shaft or it does not personify or both if it is retroactive. sent3: if either the foundress personifies or it is not astrocytic or both then it does not cast flintstone. sent4: if the foundress does cast flintstone it personifies and/or is astrocytic. sent5: if the fact that something is a Miller and it does cast flintstone is not correct then it is not a Miller. sent6: the foundress does not personify. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is a turquoise and it scouts is not true the debacle is not penetrable. sent8: if that something does personify and/or is astrocytic does not hold it does not cast flintstone. sent9: if the marocain is not a kind of a Miller either the hatchway is autocatalytic or it does not personify or both. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of a Miller and does cast flintstone is wrong if it is not bibliographic. sent11: that either the marmot is not a Atlantic or it is a kind of a duplicate or both is incorrect if there exists something such that it is not penetrable. sent12: the foundress does not cast flintstone if that it personifies and/or it is astrocytic is not right. sent13: the fact that the spurge is a turquoise and it does scout does not hold. sent14: something does not cast flintstone if that it either does personify or is not astrocytic or both is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the foundress does not cast flintstone if that it does personify or is not astrocytic or both is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the foundress personifies and/or is not astrocytic is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the foundress does not cast flintstone.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the foundress casts flintstone.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the foundress does personify and/or it is not astrocytic is not wrong.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the foundress personifies and/or is not astrocytic if it does cast flintstone.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__