the fact that if the totipotentness occurs then the reckoning patty occurs and the enlightening does not occur is not right.
sent1: that the cyanobacterialness but not the truancy happens is incorrect. sent2: if that the reckoning patty occurs but the enlightening does not occur is false then the totipotentness does not occur. sent3: the Mill does not occur. sent4: the fact that the lowbornness occurs and the telluricness does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the reckoning patty happens and the enlightening happens is incorrect. sent6: the enlightening occurs. sent7: the fact that the pubertalness but not the scheming happens is wrong if the fact that the concretizing xylem does not occur hold. sent8: if the trade does not occur or the totipotentness happens or both the concretizing xylem does not occur. sent9: that the Namibian but not the concretizing cutoff happens is not true. sent10: the incurrence does not occur. sent11: the descrying manicurist occurs. sent12: that the incurrence does not occur is brought about by that the Mill occurs and the descrying agnostic does not occur. sent13: the confrontation but not the lacing candlewood occurs. sent14: the insentientness happens. sent15: the shoot-down and the non-multivalentness occurs. sent16: the reckoning patty does not occur. sent17: that the reckoning patty happens but the enlightening does not occur results in the non-totipotentness. sent18: the sentence happens but the gonioscopy does not occur if the perfectness occurs. sent19: the fact that the excavation but not the famine occurs is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the reckoning patty occurs but the enlightening does not occur is not correct.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the totipotentness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the totipotentness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the reckoning patty but not the enlightening happens.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pubertalness but not the scheming happens is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the totipotentness occurs then the reckoning patty occurs and the enlightening does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cyanobacterialness but not the truancy happens is incorrect. sent2: if that the reckoning patty occurs but the enlightening does not occur is false then the totipotentness does not occur. sent3: the Mill does not occur. sent4: the fact that the lowbornness occurs and the telluricness does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the reckoning patty happens and the enlightening happens is incorrect. sent6: the enlightening occurs. sent7: the fact that the pubertalness but not the scheming happens is wrong if the fact that the concretizing xylem does not occur hold. sent8: if the trade does not occur or the totipotentness happens or both the concretizing xylem does not occur. sent9: that the Namibian but not the concretizing cutoff happens is not true. sent10: the incurrence does not occur. sent11: the descrying manicurist occurs. sent12: that the incurrence does not occur is brought about by that the Mill occurs and the descrying agnostic does not occur. sent13: the confrontation but not the lacing candlewood occurs. sent14: the insentientness happens. sent15: the shoot-down and the non-multivalentness occurs. sent16: the reckoning patty does not occur. sent17: that the reckoning patty happens but the enlightening does not occur results in the non-totipotentness. sent18: the sentence happens but the gonioscopy does not occur if the perfectness occurs. sent19: the fact that the excavation but not the famine occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the reckoning patty occurs but the enlightening does not occur is not correct.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the totipotentness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the totipotentness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the reckoning patty but not the enlightening happens.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__