the Cajun is not inelastic.
sent1: something is inelastic and does not traverse. sent2: the supervisor is acinar. sent3: if the crossbow is not a kind of a about-face that it is acinar thing that is a estivation is false. sent4: the fact that something is structural but it is not a estivation does not hold if it is not a SSS. sent5: something that is a stoop is acinar. sent6: if something does prefigure it is a food. sent7: the crossbow stoops if it is not a estivation and it is not structural. sent8: something is not a estivation if the fact that it is acinar and it is a estivation is not true. sent9: the torte is not a about-face if the half-mast does bullshit and is a kind of a SSS. sent10: if the half-mast is acinar and it is a bullshit then the saint does not about-face. sent11: the torte traverses and does about-face if the saint does not about-face. sent12: the half-mast does bullshit. sent13: if the morosoph is not acinar the fact that it is a SSS that is not a stoop is wrong. sent14: the Cajun is not inelastic if the torte traverses and it is a kind of a about-face. sent15: the crossbow is structural. sent16: the torte traverses if the saint is not a about-face. sent17: if the morosoph is not a SSS the half-mast stoops. sent18: the Cajun is a stoop. sent19: if the crossbow is a kind of a estivation the morosoph is not a SSS. sent20: the torte does traverse.
sent5 -> int1: if the half-mast does stoop then it is acinar.;
the Cajun is inelastic.
sent4 -> int2: if the crossbow is not a kind of a SSS that it is both structural and not a estivation is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the Cajun is not inelastic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is inelastic and does not traverse. sent2: the supervisor is acinar. sent3: if the crossbow is not a kind of a about-face that it is acinar thing that is a estivation is false. sent4: the fact that something is structural but it is not a estivation does not hold if it is not a SSS. sent5: something that is a stoop is acinar. sent6: if something does prefigure it is a food. sent7: the crossbow stoops if it is not a estivation and it is not structural. sent8: something is not a estivation if the fact that it is acinar and it is a estivation is not true. sent9: the torte is not a about-face if the half-mast does bullshit and is a kind of a SSS. sent10: if the half-mast is acinar and it is a bullshit then the saint does not about-face. sent11: the torte traverses and does about-face if the saint does not about-face. sent12: the half-mast does bullshit. sent13: if the morosoph is not acinar the fact that it is a SSS that is not a stoop is wrong. sent14: the Cajun is not inelastic if the torte traverses and it is a kind of a about-face. sent15: the crossbow is structural. sent16: the torte traverses if the saint is not a about-face. sent17: if the morosoph is not a SSS the half-mast stoops. sent18: the Cajun is a stoop. sent19: if the crossbow is a kind of a estivation the morosoph is not a SSS. sent20: the torte does traverse. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the half-mast does stoop then it is acinar.; __UNKNOWN__