the fact that the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it does decolonize guiding is not incorrect it dissimulates is not wrong is wrong.
sent1: the bine is a snowbell. sent2: if the decoupage outsails fetishism it is a kind of a karyolymph. sent3: the bine is not curatorial and/or it is not operable if that it is a kind of a snowbell hold. sent4: something does not dissimulate but it crapes if it is a lignum. sent5: if the fetishism does crape it does dissimulate. sent6: the fetishism outsails fetishism if it dissimulates. sent7: if the SOD dissimulates the fact that it is a kind of a Bradford is not incorrect. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not curatorial and/or is not operable is right then the noctiluca is a lignum. sent9: the fetishism is sexagesimal. sent10: the hotspot is literate if it does outsail leaven. sent11: if the fetishism decolonizes guiding that it is a crape is correct. sent12: the Mansi does not crape if the noctiluca does not dissimulate but it crape.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fetishism decolonizes guiding.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fetishism is a kind of a crape.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fetishism dissimulates.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the fetishism does decolonize guiding then the fact that it dissimulates hold.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the barleycorn is mesomorphic.
sent4 -> int4: if the noctiluca is a lignum it does not dissimulate and it does crape.; sent3 & sent1 -> int5: the bine is not curatorial and/or it is not operable.; int5 -> int6: something is not curatorial or it is not operable or both.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the noctiluca is a lignum.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the noctiluca does not dissimulate but it is a crape.; sent12 & int8 -> int9: the Mansi does not crape.; int9 -> int10: something is not a crape.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it does decolonize guiding is not incorrect it dissimulates is not wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the bine is a snowbell. sent2: if the decoupage outsails fetishism it is a kind of a karyolymph. sent3: the bine is not curatorial and/or it is not operable if that it is a kind of a snowbell hold. sent4: something does not dissimulate but it crapes if it is a lignum. sent5: if the fetishism does crape it does dissimulate. sent6: the fetishism outsails fetishism if it dissimulates. sent7: if the SOD dissimulates the fact that it is a kind of a Bradford is not incorrect. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not curatorial and/or is not operable is right then the noctiluca is a lignum. sent9: the fetishism is sexagesimal. sent10: the hotspot is literate if it does outsail leaven. sent11: if the fetishism decolonizes guiding that it is a crape is correct. sent12: the Mansi does not crape if the noctiluca does not dissimulate but it crape. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fetishism decolonizes guiding.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fetishism is a kind of a crape.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fetishism dissimulates.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the fetishism does decolonize guiding then the fact that it dissimulates hold.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__