that the six-spot is a kind of a buck and is not imperfect is false.
sent1: that the six-spot is not instructive but imperfect does not hold. sent2: the coatrack is appealable and does tape. sent3: if the sundew perseverates fluid but it does not perseverate recession it is a kind of a dhak. sent4: the thumb is not imperfect. sent5: if the diorite does ulcerate and is not a buck that the six-spot does buck hold. sent6: if the sundew is not molal it is not imperfect. sent7: if the sundew is not imperfect the fact that the six-spot is a buck that is imperfect is not right. sent8: the emmer does not suggest diorite if that it is a kind of a tape and it is not appealable is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the sundew is not instructive but a dhak is wrong. sent10: the diorite ulcerates and does not buck if the fact that it is not profitable is not wrong. sent11: the fact that that something is molal thing that is not profitable hold is not true if it is a labetalol. sent12: the emmer is not a Corvidae if the ankylosaur is not a kind of a Corvidae. sent13: the coatrack is molal if that it is appealable is not false. sent14: if the fact that the sundew is not instructive and is a dhak is not correct then it is not a kind of a dhak. sent15: something is not imperfect if the fact that it is a kind of molal thing that is not profitable is not correct. sent16: that the Rosicrucian does not suggest coexistence and is not a Corvidae does not hold. sent17: the coatrack is not non-molal if there are profitable things. sent18: if the emmer is profitable but it is not instructive the diorite is not profitable. sent19: the emmer is profitable but it is not instructive if it does suggest diorite. sent20: if the fact that the fact that the Rosicrucian does not suggest coexistence and it is not a Corvidae is true is wrong the ankylosaur is not a kind of a Corvidae. sent21: the fact that the fact that the emmer is both a tape and not appealable is true is incorrect if it is not a Corvidae. sent22: if the coatrack is molal the fact that the six-spot is not a dhak and it is not a labetalol is incorrect. sent23: the diorite is imperfect if the emmer is not a buck but it does ulcerate. sent24: the sundew does not perseverate recession. sent25: if that something is not a labetalol is right it does perseverate fluid and does not perseverate recession.
sent25 -> int1: if the sundew is not a labetalol then it does perseverate fluid and does not perseverate recession.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sundew is not a labetalol.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sundew does perseverate fluid but it does not perseverate recession.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the sundew is a dhak is right.; sent14 & sent9 -> int4: the sundew is not a dhak.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sundew is a labetalol.; sent11 -> int7: the fact that the sundew is molal but it is not profitable is not right if it is a labetalol.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the sundew is a kind of molal thing that is not profitable is not right.; sent15 -> int9: the sundew is not imperfect if that it is molal and it is not profitable is not correct.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the sundew is not imperfect.;
the executioner is not instructive.
sent20 & sent16 -> int11: the fact that the ankylosaur is not a kind of a Corvidae is correct.; sent12 & int11 -> int12: the emmer is not a Corvidae.; sent21 & int12 -> int13: that the emmer is a tape that is not appealable does not hold.; sent8 & int13 -> int14: the emmer does not suggest diorite.;
$hypothesis$ = that the six-spot is a kind of a buck and is not imperfect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the six-spot is not instructive but imperfect does not hold. sent2: the coatrack is appealable and does tape. sent3: if the sundew perseverates fluid but it does not perseverate recession it is a kind of a dhak. sent4: the thumb is not imperfect. sent5: if the diorite does ulcerate and is not a buck that the six-spot does buck hold. sent6: if the sundew is not molal it is not imperfect. sent7: if the sundew is not imperfect the fact that the six-spot is a buck that is imperfect is not right. sent8: the emmer does not suggest diorite if that it is a kind of a tape and it is not appealable is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the sundew is not instructive but a dhak is wrong. sent10: the diorite ulcerates and does not buck if the fact that it is not profitable is not wrong. sent11: the fact that that something is molal thing that is not profitable hold is not true if it is a labetalol. sent12: the emmer is not a Corvidae if the ankylosaur is not a kind of a Corvidae. sent13: the coatrack is molal if that it is appealable is not false. sent14: if the fact that the sundew is not instructive and is a dhak is not correct then it is not a kind of a dhak. sent15: something is not imperfect if the fact that it is a kind of molal thing that is not profitable is not correct. sent16: that the Rosicrucian does not suggest coexistence and is not a Corvidae does not hold. sent17: the coatrack is not non-molal if there are profitable things. sent18: if the emmer is profitable but it is not instructive the diorite is not profitable. sent19: the emmer is profitable but it is not instructive if it does suggest diorite. sent20: if the fact that the fact that the Rosicrucian does not suggest coexistence and it is not a Corvidae is true is wrong the ankylosaur is not a kind of a Corvidae. sent21: the fact that the fact that the emmer is both a tape and not appealable is true is incorrect if it is not a Corvidae. sent22: if the coatrack is molal the fact that the six-spot is not a dhak and it is not a labetalol is incorrect. sent23: the diorite is imperfect if the emmer is not a buck but it does ulcerate. sent24: the sundew does not perseverate recession. sent25: if that something is not a labetalol is right it does perseverate fluid and does not perseverate recession. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 -> int1: if the sundew is not a labetalol then it does perseverate fluid and does not perseverate recession.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sundew is not a labetalol.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sundew does perseverate fluid but it does not perseverate recession.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the sundew is a dhak is right.; sent14 & sent9 -> int4: the sundew is not a dhak.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sundew is a labetalol.; sent11 -> int7: the fact that the sundew is molal but it is not profitable is not right if it is a labetalol.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the sundew is a kind of molal thing that is not profitable is not right.; sent15 -> int9: the sundew is not imperfect if that it is molal and it is not profitable is not correct.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the sundew is not imperfect.; __UNKNOWN__