the bassinet is legible if the feedlot is unadaptable.
sent1: if the fact that the feedlot is conditional but it does not compromise twenty-three does not hold the bassinet is not non-maladaptive. sent2: that something is legible is true if it is maladaptive. sent3: that something is Dostoevskian but it does not habituate is not right if it is unadaptable. sent4: the fact that the feedlot is legible and it is maladaptive does not hold if it does compromise twenty-three. sent5: if something saponifies then that it is a nazi and it is not acoustics is not true. sent6: the bassinet is conditional. sent7: if the feedlot is not conditional the bassinet is maladaptive. sent8: that something is conditional but it does not compromise twenty-three is incorrect if it is unadaptable. sent9: the showerhead does compromise twenty-three. sent10: if something is a yardage then that it is both coloring and a witching is false.
sent8 -> int1: if the feedlot is unadaptable then the fact that it is conditional and does not compromise twenty-three is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the feedlot is unadaptable.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the feedlot is a kind of conditional thing that does not compromise twenty-three is not correct.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the bassinet is maladaptive is right.; sent2 -> int4: the bassinet is legible if it is maladaptive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bassinet is legible.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
if the hoarder is unadaptable that it is Dostoevskian and it does not habituate is incorrect.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bassinet is legible if the feedlot is unadaptable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the feedlot is conditional but it does not compromise twenty-three does not hold the bassinet is not non-maladaptive. sent2: that something is legible is true if it is maladaptive. sent3: that something is Dostoevskian but it does not habituate is not right if it is unadaptable. sent4: the fact that the feedlot is legible and it is maladaptive does not hold if it does compromise twenty-three. sent5: if something saponifies then that it is a nazi and it is not acoustics is not true. sent6: the bassinet is conditional. sent7: if the feedlot is not conditional the bassinet is maladaptive. sent8: that something is conditional but it does not compromise twenty-three is incorrect if it is unadaptable. sent9: the showerhead does compromise twenty-three. sent10: if something is a yardage then that it is both coloring and a witching is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the feedlot is unadaptable then the fact that it is conditional and does not compromise twenty-three is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the feedlot is unadaptable.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the feedlot is a kind of conditional thing that does not compromise twenty-three is not correct.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the bassinet is maladaptive is right.; sent2 -> int4: the bassinet is legible if it is maladaptive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bassinet is legible.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__