the fact that the racerunner is not polymorphous does not hold.
sent1: if something that does outstare chromatism is polymorphous the strengthener is not tuberous. sent2: the fact that the liquidator is a stylopodium and does outstare chromatism is not correct. sent3: if the lederhosen hums pleasantry then the fact that the racerunner is both not a stylopodium and a Yorktown is not true. sent4: if the liquidator is not a Yorktown the fact that it is a stylopodium and it outstares chromatism does not hold. sent5: that the strengthener is tuberous but it does not hum pleasantry does not hold if the lederhosen is not tuberous. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a stylopodium and does not outstare chromatism is incorrect if it is not a Yorktown. sent7: if something is not a kind of a Yorktown the fact that it is a kind of a stylopodium and it does outstare chromatism is not true. sent8: that the liquidator is tuberous but it is not a Yorktown does not hold. sent9: the lederhosen hums pleasantry if that the strengthener is not a sectarianism but it does outstare chromatism is not true. sent10: the racerunner is polymorphous if the fact that the liquidator is a stylopodium and does not outstare chromatism is not true. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a crew. sent12: the strengthener is not a Ledbetter. sent13: there is something such that it is Hugoesque thing that is a crew. sent14: there is something such that it is Hugoesque. sent15: if the liquidator outstares chromatism the racerunner is polymorphous. sent16: the marmite is not a Yorktown. sent17: that the lederhosen is not non-tuberous but it does not outstare chromatism is not correct. sent18: something is not tuberous and not a crew if that it is not a Yorktown is not false. sent19: something is not polymorphous if it is not Hugoesque. sent20: if the strengthener is not tuberous the fact that the liquidator is not a Yorktown hold. sent21: the fact that the lederhosen is a kind of a prospector that is not tuberous does not hold. sent22: if something that is not non-Hugoesque crows then the lederhosen is not tuberous. sent23: if a non-tuberous thing is not a kind of a crew it is not Hugoesque.
sent13 & sent22 -> int1: the lederhosen is not tuberous.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the strengthener is tuberous and does not hum pleasantry is not right.; sent6 -> int3: if the liquidator is not a kind of a Yorktown the fact that it is a stylopodium and does not outstare chromatism does not hold.;
the racerunner is not polymorphous.
sent19 -> int4: the racerunner is not polymorphous if that it is not Hugoesque is not incorrect.; sent23 -> int5: if the racerunner is not tuberous and not a crew it is not Hugoesque.; sent18 -> int6: if the racerunner is not a kind of a Yorktown it is not tuberous and it does not crow.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the racerunner is not polymorphous does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does outstare chromatism is polymorphous the strengthener is not tuberous. sent2: the fact that the liquidator is a stylopodium and does outstare chromatism is not correct. sent3: if the lederhosen hums pleasantry then the fact that the racerunner is both not a stylopodium and a Yorktown is not true. sent4: if the liquidator is not a Yorktown the fact that it is a stylopodium and it outstares chromatism does not hold. sent5: that the strengthener is tuberous but it does not hum pleasantry does not hold if the lederhosen is not tuberous. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a stylopodium and does not outstare chromatism is incorrect if it is not a Yorktown. sent7: if something is not a kind of a Yorktown the fact that it is a kind of a stylopodium and it does outstare chromatism is not true. sent8: that the liquidator is tuberous but it is not a Yorktown does not hold. sent9: the lederhosen hums pleasantry if that the strengthener is not a sectarianism but it does outstare chromatism is not true. sent10: the racerunner is polymorphous if the fact that the liquidator is a stylopodium and does not outstare chromatism is not true. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a crew. sent12: the strengthener is not a Ledbetter. sent13: there is something such that it is Hugoesque thing that is a crew. sent14: there is something such that it is Hugoesque. sent15: if the liquidator outstares chromatism the racerunner is polymorphous. sent16: the marmite is not a Yorktown. sent17: that the lederhosen is not non-tuberous but it does not outstare chromatism is not correct. sent18: something is not tuberous and not a crew if that it is not a Yorktown is not false. sent19: something is not polymorphous if it is not Hugoesque. sent20: if the strengthener is not tuberous the fact that the liquidator is not a Yorktown hold. sent21: the fact that the lederhosen is a kind of a prospector that is not tuberous does not hold. sent22: if something that is not non-Hugoesque crows then the lederhosen is not tuberous. sent23: if a non-tuberous thing is not a kind of a crew it is not Hugoesque. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent22 -> int1: the lederhosen is not tuberous.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the strengthener is tuberous and does not hum pleasantry is not right.; sent6 -> int3: if the liquidator is not a kind of a Yorktown the fact that it is a stylopodium and does not outstare chromatism does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__