the fact that the Appalachians does not grasp mahoe and is estimable is not correct.
sent1: the Appalachians is medieval. sent2: the fact that the Appalachians is a ingress is correct if the fact that it is not constant and it grasps mahoe hold. sent3: the Homer is not estimable but it is nondisposable. sent4: the Appalachians does not grasp mahoe and is not non-etiological. sent5: the fact that the Appalachians does not grasp mahoe and it does not glaze lancet is not incorrect. sent6: if the pleurodont is estimable then the fact that the Appalachians does not grasp mahoe but it is estimable does not hold. sent7: if something does not glaze lancet and is a constant it is estimable. sent8: the fact that the Appalachians does grasp mahoe and is estimable is wrong. sent9: the lancet is non-feverish thing that is not a ingress. sent10: if the lancet is not constant the pleurodont does not glaze lancet but it is a constant. sent11: if the lancet is a kind of non-feverish thing that is not a ingress it is fertile. sent12: that the pleurodont does not glaze lancet is right if the lancet is not constant. sent13: if the fact that the lancet is not constant but it is etiological is wrong then it is not fertile. sent14: the pleurodont does not glaze lancet. sent15: if the pleurodont is estimable the fact that that the Appalachians does grasp mahoe and it is estimable is right is not right. sent16: the lancet is not feverish. sent17: the mountainside is not a kind of a alundum and it is not a risen. sent18: if the lancet is a kind of feverish thing that is not a ingress it is fertile. sent19: if something that does glaze lancet is constant it is estimable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the lancet is not constant but it is etiological is incorrect.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the lancet is not fertile.; sent11 & sent9 -> int2: the lancet is fertile.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lancet is not constant and is etiological.; int4 -> int5: the lancet is not constant.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the pleurodont does not glaze lancet and is not inconstant.; sent7 -> int7: that the pleurodont is estimable hold if it does not glaze lancet and is a kind of a constant.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the pleurodont is estimable.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Appalachians does not grasp mahoe and is estimable is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Appalachians is medieval. sent2: the fact that the Appalachians is a ingress is correct if the fact that it is not constant and it grasps mahoe hold. sent3: the Homer is not estimable but it is nondisposable. sent4: the Appalachians does not grasp mahoe and is not non-etiological. sent5: the fact that the Appalachians does not grasp mahoe and it does not glaze lancet is not incorrect. sent6: if the pleurodont is estimable then the fact that the Appalachians does not grasp mahoe but it is estimable does not hold. sent7: if something does not glaze lancet and is a constant it is estimable. sent8: the fact that the Appalachians does grasp mahoe and is estimable is wrong. sent9: the lancet is non-feverish thing that is not a ingress. sent10: if the lancet is not constant the pleurodont does not glaze lancet but it is a constant. sent11: if the lancet is a kind of non-feverish thing that is not a ingress it is fertile. sent12: that the pleurodont does not glaze lancet is right if the lancet is not constant. sent13: if the fact that the lancet is not constant but it is etiological is wrong then it is not fertile. sent14: the pleurodont does not glaze lancet. sent15: if the pleurodont is estimable the fact that that the Appalachians does grasp mahoe and it is estimable is right is not right. sent16: the lancet is not feverish. sent17: the mountainside is not a kind of a alundum and it is not a risen. sent18: if the lancet is a kind of feverish thing that is not a ingress it is fertile. sent19: if something that does glaze lancet is constant it is estimable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the lancet is not constant but it is etiological is incorrect.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the lancet is not fertile.; sent11 & sent9 -> int2: the lancet is fertile.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lancet is not constant and is etiological.; int4 -> int5: the lancet is not constant.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the pleurodont does not glaze lancet and is not inconstant.; sent7 -> int7: that the pleurodont is estimable hold if it does not glaze lancet and is a kind of a constant.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the pleurodont is estimable.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__