the fact that the four-spot is neritic if the Merlin is a graciousness does not hold.
sent1: if that the itinerary is not neritic or not an edge or both is not incorrect then it is a kind of a Pleione. sent2: if that the four-spot is electrocardiographic and/or it is not a turban is not true then the Merlin is not a graciousness. sent3: the four-spot is not electrocardiographic and/or it is a turban. sent4: if the four-spot is a kind of a turban then the Merlin is neritic. sent5: something is neritic if it is not electrocardiographic or it is not a turban or both. sent6: if the fact that the four-spot is not electrocardiographic and/or it is not a kind of a turban is incorrect the Merlin is a graciousness. sent7: the Merlin is not a graciousness if the fact that the four-spot is non-electrocardiographic and/or it is a turban is false. sent8: the four-spot is electrocardiographic and/or not a turban. sent9: the Merlin is not a graciousness if that the fact that the four-spot is not electrocardiographic and/or it is not a turban is not correct hold. sent10: that either the annelid is not neritic or it does not weed Marciano or both is wrong. sent11: the Merlin is not electrocardiographic.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the four-spot is not electrocardiographic and/or it is not a turban is not right.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the Merlin is not a graciousness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Merlin is a kind of a graciousness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: either the four-spot is not electrocardiographic or it is not a turban or both.; sent5 -> int4: if the four-spot is not electrocardiographic or is not a turban or both then it is not non-neritic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the four-spot is neritic.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the four-spot is neritic if the Merlin is a graciousness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the itinerary is not neritic or not an edge or both is not incorrect then it is a kind of a Pleione. sent2: if that the four-spot is electrocardiographic and/or it is not a turban is not true then the Merlin is not a graciousness. sent3: the four-spot is not electrocardiographic and/or it is a turban. sent4: if the four-spot is a kind of a turban then the Merlin is neritic. sent5: something is neritic if it is not electrocardiographic or it is not a turban or both. sent6: if the fact that the four-spot is not electrocardiographic and/or it is not a kind of a turban is incorrect the Merlin is a graciousness. sent7: the Merlin is not a graciousness if the fact that the four-spot is non-electrocardiographic and/or it is a turban is false. sent8: the four-spot is electrocardiographic and/or not a turban. sent9: the Merlin is not a graciousness if that the fact that the four-spot is not electrocardiographic and/or it is not a turban is not correct hold. sent10: that either the annelid is not neritic or it does not weed Marciano or both is wrong. sent11: the Merlin is not electrocardiographic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the four-spot is not electrocardiographic and/or it is not a turban is not right.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the Merlin is not a graciousness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Merlin is a kind of a graciousness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: either the four-spot is not electrocardiographic or it is not a turban or both.; sent5 -> int4: if the four-spot is not electrocardiographic or is not a turban or both then it is not non-neritic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the four-spot is neritic.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__