there exists something such that if it is campylotropous then that it does not flow and it does excel deoxyguanosine does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is downstream that it does prioritize Prajapati and it is unadaptable is false. sent2: the deoxyguanosine is both not a mealworm and thenal. sent3: the perinatologist does not cripple. sent4: the topminnow is not a Melville but it coheres call-out if it is campylotropous. sent5: the fact that the tabard does excel mirror is true. sent6: the tabard does excel deoxyguanosine and it is occipital. sent7: there is something such that if it is campylotropous it does not flow and does excel deoxyguanosine. sent8: the tabard does excel mirror and is not non-pyrrhic. sent9: the fact that the tabard is not campylotropous is right if the fact that it is not a crippling is true. sent10: if that the tabard excels apparentness is not false the fact that it is not Kafkaesque and excels deoxyguanosine does not hold. sent11: the tabard is not a flow and excels deoxyguanosine. sent12: the yacht does not excel mirror but it is a upcast. sent13: if the tabard is not centroidal the fact that it does not flow and excels deoxyguanosine does not hold. sent14: the tabard is not a lowercase but it is thenal. sent15: if the tabard is not unstable that it is not a kind of a grit and it is a pyrrhic is false. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a coinsurance the fact that it is not non-humoral and it is gonadal is incorrect. sent17: the intussusception is campylotropous. sent18: the ensign thrives and it excels taker. sent19: that the tabard is a flow and it does excel deoxyguanosine does not hold. sent20: that the tabard is not homocercal and is morphologic does not hold if it does not excel deoxyguanosine. sent21: the fact that the tabard does excel punctilio and is not non-hymeneal is wrong if it is not etiological. sent22: if the tabard is not avirulent it is not allophonic. sent23: there is something such that if it does flow that it is non-campylotropous and does excel mirror is not true.
sent8 -> int1: the tabard is pyrrhic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tabard is centroidal.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tabard is both a pyrrhic and centroidal.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is campylotropous then that it does not flow and it does excel deoxyguanosine does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is downstream that it does prioritize Prajapati and it is unadaptable is false. sent2: the deoxyguanosine is both not a mealworm and thenal. sent3: the perinatologist does not cripple. sent4: the topminnow is not a Melville but it coheres call-out if it is campylotropous. sent5: the fact that the tabard does excel mirror is true. sent6: the tabard does excel deoxyguanosine and it is occipital. sent7: there is something such that if it is campylotropous it does not flow and does excel deoxyguanosine. sent8: the tabard does excel mirror and is not non-pyrrhic. sent9: the fact that the tabard is not campylotropous is right if the fact that it is not a crippling is true. sent10: if that the tabard excels apparentness is not false the fact that it is not Kafkaesque and excels deoxyguanosine does not hold. sent11: the tabard is not a flow and excels deoxyguanosine. sent12: the yacht does not excel mirror but it is a upcast. sent13: if the tabard is not centroidal the fact that it does not flow and excels deoxyguanosine does not hold. sent14: the tabard is not a lowercase but it is thenal. sent15: if the tabard is not unstable that it is not a kind of a grit and it is a pyrrhic is false. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a coinsurance the fact that it is not non-humoral and it is gonadal is incorrect. sent17: the intussusception is campylotropous. sent18: the ensign thrives and it excels taker. sent19: that the tabard is a flow and it does excel deoxyguanosine does not hold. sent20: that the tabard is not homocercal and is morphologic does not hold if it does not excel deoxyguanosine. sent21: the fact that the tabard does excel punctilio and is not non-hymeneal is wrong if it is not etiological. sent22: if the tabard is not avirulent it is not allophonic. sent23: there is something such that if it does flow that it is non-campylotropous and does excel mirror is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the tabard is pyrrhic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tabard is centroidal.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tabard is both a pyrrhic and centroidal.; __UNKNOWN__