the supermarketer does outstare Peronosporaceae.
sent1: the sandal melanizes if the job is not a shovelhead. sent2: if the stent is not acculturational then the supermarketer is an agnostic that does outstare Peronosporaceae. sent3: everything does peck. sent4: something is a kind of an agnostic if it is a salai. sent5: the sandal melanizes if the fact that the job does not melanizes hold. sent6: the job is not a shovelhead if the fact that the sandal does not surmise sawm is not wrong. sent7: if the stent is not non-agnostic the job is acculturational and/or does not surmise propenoate. sent8: something does not surmise sawm if it does not surmise propenoate. sent9: if the perpetrator does surmise ways then the fact that the stent is a salai is correct. sent10: the supermarketer is not a shovelhead if the job is not a kind of an agnostic. sent11: something surmises propenoate if it is not a shovelhead. sent12: the stent is a kind of a salai if the perpetrator is not a salai. sent13: the sandal does not surmise sawm if something that is a piggyback does melanize. sent14: something is a piggyback and melanizes. sent15: there is something such that it melanizes. sent16: the stent is non-acculturational if the job surmises propenoate. sent17: if something is acculturational it does not surmise sawm. sent18: the supermarketer melanizes if the sandal does melanizes. sent19: there exists something such that it is a piggyback. sent20: the perpetrator either does surmise ways or is not a salai or both if the propenoate is not an exigency. sent21: the fact that something is not articular but anamorphic does not hold if it pecks. sent22: the fact that something is not an exigency is not incorrect if that it is not articular and it is anamorphic is not right. sent23: if something does not surmise sawm then either it is not a kind of a shovelhead or it does not melanize or both.
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the sandal does not surmise sawm is not wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the job is not a shovelhead is true.; sent11 -> int3: if the job is not a shovelhead then it surmises propenoate.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the job surmises propenoate.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the stent is not acculturational.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the supermarketer is a kind of an agnostic and does outstare Peronosporaceae.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the supermarketer does not outstare Peronosporaceae.
sent8 -> int7: if the fact that the job does not surmise propenoate hold it does not surmise sawm.; sent22 -> int8: if the fact that the maikoa is not articular but it is anamorphic is not correct it is not a kind of an exigency.; sent3 -> int9: the starches pecks.; sent21 -> int10: if the starches does peck that it is not articular and it is anamorphic is false.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the starches is not articular but it is anamorphic is false.; int11 -> int12: there is nothing such that it is both non-articular and anamorphic.; int12 -> int13: the fact that the maikoa is not articular and is anamorphic is wrong.; int8 & int13 -> int14: the maikoa is not an exigency.; int14 -> int15: everything is not a kind of an exigency.; int15 -> int16: the propenoate is not a kind of an exigency.; sent20 & int16 -> int17: the perpetrator surmises ways and/or it is not a kind of a salai.; int17 & sent12 & sent9 -> int18: the stent is a salai.; sent4 -> int19: if the stent is a salai then it is agnostic.; int18 & int19 -> int20: the fact that the stent is an agnostic is not false.; sent7 & int20 -> int21: the job is acculturational or does not surmise propenoate or both.; sent17 -> int22: the job does not surmise sawm if it is acculturational.; int7 & int21 & int22 -> int23: the job does not surmise sawm.; sent23 -> int24: if the job does not surmise sawm then it either is not a kind of a shovelhead or does not melanize or both.; int23 & int24 -> int25: the job is not a shovelhead or it does not melanize or both.; sent5 & int25 & sent1 -> int26: the sandal does melanize.; sent18 & int26 -> int27: the supermarketer melanizes.;
$hypothesis$ = the supermarketer does outstare Peronosporaceae. ; $context$ = sent1: the sandal melanizes if the job is not a shovelhead. sent2: if the stent is not acculturational then the supermarketer is an agnostic that does outstare Peronosporaceae. sent3: everything does peck. sent4: something is a kind of an agnostic if it is a salai. sent5: the sandal melanizes if the fact that the job does not melanizes hold. sent6: the job is not a shovelhead if the fact that the sandal does not surmise sawm is not wrong. sent7: if the stent is not non-agnostic the job is acculturational and/or does not surmise propenoate. sent8: something does not surmise sawm if it does not surmise propenoate. sent9: if the perpetrator does surmise ways then the fact that the stent is a salai is correct. sent10: the supermarketer is not a shovelhead if the job is not a kind of an agnostic. sent11: something surmises propenoate if it is not a shovelhead. sent12: the stent is a kind of a salai if the perpetrator is not a salai. sent13: the sandal does not surmise sawm if something that is a piggyback does melanize. sent14: something is a piggyback and melanizes. sent15: there is something such that it melanizes. sent16: the stent is non-acculturational if the job surmises propenoate. sent17: if something is acculturational it does not surmise sawm. sent18: the supermarketer melanizes if the sandal does melanizes. sent19: there exists something such that it is a piggyback. sent20: the perpetrator either does surmise ways or is not a salai or both if the propenoate is not an exigency. sent21: the fact that something is not articular but anamorphic does not hold if it pecks. sent22: the fact that something is not an exigency is not incorrect if that it is not articular and it is anamorphic is not right. sent23: if something does not surmise sawm then either it is not a kind of a shovelhead or it does not melanize or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the sandal does not surmise sawm is not wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the job is not a shovelhead is true.; sent11 -> int3: if the job is not a shovelhead then it surmises propenoate.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the job surmises propenoate.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the stent is not acculturational.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the supermarketer is a kind of an agnostic and does outstare Peronosporaceae.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__