the fact that there exists something such that if it is verbal the fact that it is insectivorous and it is not a saddleback is not correct is not right.
sent1: if the spall is a park that it does requite pull and is not a Antennariidae does not hold. sent2: the fact that the lace is permeable but it is not a kind of a Wittgenstein is not correct if it is a workaholism. sent3: the fact that the spall is insectivorous but it is not a saddleback is wrong if it is verbal. sent4: there is something such that if it does stave flytrap then the fact that it is a kind of Fijian thing that is not a peak is not true. sent5: if the spall is verbal the fact that it is insectivorous and is a saddleback does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is a minstrelsy then the fact that it does impinge lace and it is not a Spartan is not true. sent7: the spall is insectivorous thing that is not a saddleback if it is verbal. sent8: if that the formaldehyde is a Cichorium is not false then that it does stave era and it is non-verbal is not true. sent9: if the spall does impinge Tuscany then the fact that it is a rhumb and it is not verbal does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it does impinge Euphagus that it is a kind of a Maeandra and it is not a kind of a caliph is not true. sent11: there is something such that if it is verbal then that it is insectivorous a saddleback is not true. sent12: if the spall is postmodernist then the fact that it is a paca and is not insectivorous is incorrect. sent13: if the spall is verbal that it is a kind of a Tuscan and it is not metric is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a foul the fact that it does impinge Pawnee and it is not democratic is incorrect. sent15: if the spall is a silicon then the fact that it is both a sleep and not metric is not true. sent16: if the fact that the exteroceptor is ceric is right the fact that it is both lax and not verbal does not hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it is verbal then it is insectivorous thing that is not a saddleback. sent18: if something is verbal that it is a Cichorium and does not blacklist skidpan is wrong.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
that the spall is a Cichorium that does not blacklist skidpan is not true if it is verbal.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is verbal the fact that it is insectivorous and it is not a saddleback is not correct is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spall is a park that it does requite pull and is not a Antennariidae does not hold. sent2: the fact that the lace is permeable but it is not a kind of a Wittgenstein is not correct if it is a workaholism. sent3: the fact that the spall is insectivorous but it is not a saddleback is wrong if it is verbal. sent4: there is something such that if it does stave flytrap then the fact that it is a kind of Fijian thing that is not a peak is not true. sent5: if the spall is verbal the fact that it is insectivorous and is a saddleback does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is a minstrelsy then the fact that it does impinge lace and it is not a Spartan is not true. sent7: the spall is insectivorous thing that is not a saddleback if it is verbal. sent8: if that the formaldehyde is a Cichorium is not false then that it does stave era and it is non-verbal is not true. sent9: if the spall does impinge Tuscany then the fact that it is a rhumb and it is not verbal does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it does impinge Euphagus that it is a kind of a Maeandra and it is not a kind of a caliph is not true. sent11: there is something such that if it is verbal then that it is insectivorous a saddleback is not true. sent12: if the spall is postmodernist then the fact that it is a paca and is not insectivorous is incorrect. sent13: if the spall is verbal that it is a kind of a Tuscan and it is not metric is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a foul the fact that it does impinge Pawnee and it is not democratic is incorrect. sent15: if the spall is a silicon then the fact that it is both a sleep and not metric is not true. sent16: if the fact that the exteroceptor is ceric is right the fact that it is both lax and not verbal does not hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it is verbal then it is insectivorous thing that is not a saddleback. sent18: if something is verbal that it is a Cichorium and does not blacklist skidpan is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__