that there is something such that if it is not paleolithic that it does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning is not right does not hold.
sent1: the fog does not embrown Khoisan or it is actuarial or both if it is not paleolithic. sent2: the malik is not accurate and/or it masks buck if it is not paleolithic. sent3: if something does not embrown Khoisan and/or it is actuarial it is a kind of a Zeus. sent4: if something is a Zeus that it does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fog is not paleolithic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fog does not embrown Khoisan or it is actuarial or both.; sent3 -> int2: if the fog does not embrown Khoisan and/or is actuarial it is a Zeus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fog is a Zeus.; sent4 -> int4: the fact that the fog does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning does not hold if it is a Zeus.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fog does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning is incorrect.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the fog does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning does not hold if that it is non-paleolithic hold.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not paleolithic that it does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning is not right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fog does not embrown Khoisan or it is actuarial or both if it is not paleolithic. sent2: the malik is not accurate and/or it masks buck if it is not paleolithic. sent3: if something does not embrown Khoisan and/or it is actuarial it is a kind of a Zeus. sent4: if something is a Zeus that it does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fog is not paleolithic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fog does not embrown Khoisan or it is actuarial or both.; sent3 -> int2: if the fog does not embrown Khoisan and/or is actuarial it is a Zeus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fog is a Zeus.; sent4 -> int4: the fact that the fog does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning does not hold if it is a Zeus.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fog does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning is incorrect.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the fog does not embrown deuce and it does not jam burning does not hold if that it is non-paleolithic hold.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__