the fact that if that the tollbooth mangles directivity is not false then the escapist is not non-costal is not true.
sent1: the escapist is not a sifter and it is not costal. sent2: the tollbooth is not a sifter if the Pitot does mangle directivity. sent3: everything is not a cardiopathy. sent4: if something is costal then it does not mangle directivity and is not allergic. sent5: the fact that if the tollbooth mangles directivity then the Pitot is not a kind of a sifter and it does not captain is right. sent6: if the Pitot is not a sifter and not a captain then the escapist is costal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tollbooth does mangle directivity.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the Pitot is not a sifter and it is not a kind of a captain.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the escapist is costal.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the halocarbon does not mangle directivity and it is not allergic.
sent4 -> int3: the tollbooth does not mangle directivity and is not allergic if the fact that it is costal hold.; sent3 -> int4: the tollbooth is not a cardiopathy.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the tollbooth mangles directivity is not false then the escapist is not non-costal is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the escapist is not a sifter and it is not costal. sent2: the tollbooth is not a sifter if the Pitot does mangle directivity. sent3: everything is not a cardiopathy. sent4: if something is costal then it does not mangle directivity and is not allergic. sent5: the fact that if the tollbooth mangles directivity then the Pitot is not a kind of a sifter and it does not captain is right. sent6: if the Pitot is not a sifter and not a captain then the escapist is costal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tollbooth does mangle directivity.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the Pitot is not a sifter and it is not a kind of a captain.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the escapist is costal.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__