the Ionianness happens.
sent1: the demilitarizing benefit does not occur if the bicylindricalness and the pleuralness happens. sent2: that not the contradistinguishing Cezanne but the covering occurs does not hold if the interleaving uphill does not occur. sent3: if the dot-com does not occur the fact that that the guidance does not occur but the CT happens is not wrong does not hold. sent4: the interleaving Nernst happens if the parodying does not occur. sent5: that not the tweezing but the prehensileness happens does not hold if the subsiding does not occur. sent6: if the bicylindricalness does not occur then that not the incompetentness but the fretting subclass occurs is not right. sent7: the contradistinguishing monosaccharide does not occur if the interiorness happens and the millennialness happens. sent8: the contradistinguishing chessman happens. sent9: the holocaust does not occur. sent10: the interleaving lamprey occurs. sent11: the ambushing does not occur. sent12: that not the saddling but the architecture occurs is false if the contradistinguishing gelechiid does not occur. sent13: that the endoparasiticness does not occur prevents that the Ionian happens. sent14: the acapnicness does not occur. sent15: if that the demilitarizing sarcoplasm does not occur is true that the Tobagonian does not occur and the ebbtide happens is incorrect. sent16: the displacement does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the incompetent does not occur but the fretting subclass occurs is incorrect then the fretting Job happens. sent18: that the mucinousness occurs is right. sent19: the familiarness does not occur. sent20: the apteralness does not occur if the prematureness does not occur. sent21: the mediatedness happens. sent22: the endoparasiticness is prevented by that the fretting Job happens. sent23: that the uninstructiveness does not occur but the Kafkaesqueness happens is wrong if the familiar does not occur. sent24: the demilitarizing benefit happens if the fact that not the uninstructiveness but the Kafkaesqueness occurs is wrong. sent25: if that the allergenicness does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that not the CT but the monochromaticness occurs is wrong. sent26: if the fact that that not the softness but the hieratic happens is not right is correct the catholicizing happens. sent27: the pleuralness occurs. sent28: if that not the contradistinguishing frumenty but the pushball happens is not correct then the adaptiveness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bicylindricalness happens.; assump1 & sent27 -> int1: both the bicylindricalness and the pleuralness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the demilitarizing benefit does not occur.; sent23 & sent19 -> int3: that the uninstructiveness does not occur and the Kafkaesqueness happens does not hold.; sent24 & int3 -> int4: the demilitarizing benefit occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the bicylindricalness does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that not the incompetent but the fretting subclass happens is false.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the fretting Job occurs.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the endoparasiticness does not occur.; int9 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Ionianness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the demilitarizing benefit does not occur if the bicylindricalness and the pleuralness happens. sent2: that not the contradistinguishing Cezanne but the covering occurs does not hold if the interleaving uphill does not occur. sent3: if the dot-com does not occur the fact that that the guidance does not occur but the CT happens is not wrong does not hold. sent4: the interleaving Nernst happens if the parodying does not occur. sent5: that not the tweezing but the prehensileness happens does not hold if the subsiding does not occur. sent6: if the bicylindricalness does not occur then that not the incompetentness but the fretting subclass occurs is not right. sent7: the contradistinguishing monosaccharide does not occur if the interiorness happens and the millennialness happens. sent8: the contradistinguishing chessman happens. sent9: the holocaust does not occur. sent10: the interleaving lamprey occurs. sent11: the ambushing does not occur. sent12: that not the saddling but the architecture occurs is false if the contradistinguishing gelechiid does not occur. sent13: that the endoparasiticness does not occur prevents that the Ionian happens. sent14: the acapnicness does not occur. sent15: if that the demilitarizing sarcoplasm does not occur is true that the Tobagonian does not occur and the ebbtide happens is incorrect. sent16: the displacement does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the incompetent does not occur but the fretting subclass occurs is incorrect then the fretting Job happens. sent18: that the mucinousness occurs is right. sent19: the familiarness does not occur. sent20: the apteralness does not occur if the prematureness does not occur. sent21: the mediatedness happens. sent22: the endoparasiticness is prevented by that the fretting Job happens. sent23: that the uninstructiveness does not occur but the Kafkaesqueness happens is wrong if the familiar does not occur. sent24: the demilitarizing benefit happens if the fact that not the uninstructiveness but the Kafkaesqueness occurs is wrong. sent25: if that the allergenicness does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that not the CT but the monochromaticness occurs is wrong. sent26: if the fact that that not the softness but the hieratic happens is not right is correct the catholicizing happens. sent27: the pleuralness occurs. sent28: if that not the contradistinguishing frumenty but the pushball happens is not correct then the adaptiveness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bicylindricalness happens.; assump1 & sent27 -> int1: both the bicylindricalness and the pleuralness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the demilitarizing benefit does not occur.; sent23 & sent19 -> int3: that the uninstructiveness does not occur and the Kafkaesqueness happens does not hold.; sent24 & int3 -> int4: the demilitarizing benefit occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the bicylindricalness does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that not the incompetent but the fretting subclass happens is false.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the fretting Job occurs.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the endoparasiticness does not occur.; int9 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__