the fact that the Fula is not a kind of a provost but it is a Romanal is not correct.
sent1: if the balminess does not suppurate but it does measure danseur the brogan is a cytosol. sent2: if something is not a kind of a cytosol then that it does average brogan and it is a Tibicen is false. sent3: the start is a unpretentiousness. sent4: the brogan is a Myrmeleon. sent5: that the balminess does suppurate and is seasonable does not hold if the start does not suppurate. sent6: the balminess is a kind of a Tibicen if that it does not suppurate and measures danseur is incorrect. sent7: if something is both a cytosol and a Myrmeleon then it is not a kind of a provost. sent8: the start is not a Tibicen if there exists something such that the fact that it is a unpretentiousness and a Tibicen is not right. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a unpretentiousness and a Tibicen does not hold. sent10: that the Fula is not a provost but it is a Romanal is wrong if the brogan is not a provost. sent11: that the start does average brogan but it is not a kind of a Tibicen is not correct if the balminess is a Tibicen. sent12: the fact that the balminess is a kind of a Myrmeleon and is not a kind of a Tibicen is not true. sent13: the fact that that the brogan is both not a cytosol and a provost is not right is not wrong if the start is not a kind of a cytosol. sent14: the balminess does measure danseur. sent15: the start is not a kind of a Tibicen if there is something such that it is not a unpretentiousness. sent16: there exists something such that it is a unpretentiousness and it is a Tibicen. sent17: the start does average brogan and is seasonable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the balminess does not suppurate but it measures danseur is wrong is correct.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the balminess is a Tibicen.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the start does average brogan and is not a Tibicen is wrong.; sent17 -> int3: the start does average brogan.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the start is not a Tibicen hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the start averages brogan but it is not a kind of a Tibicen.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the balminess does not suppurate but it does measure danseur.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the fact that the brogan is a cytosol is right.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the brogan is a kind of a cytosol and it is a kind of a Myrmeleon.; sent7 -> int10: the fact that the brogan is not a provost hold if it is a kind of a cytosol and it is a Myrmeleon.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the brogan is not a kind of a provost.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the flagship does not suppurate and does measure taped is wrong.
sent2 -> int12: that the start does average brogan and it is a Tibicen is false if it is not a kind of a cytosol.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Fula is not a kind of a provost but it is a Romanal is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the balminess does not suppurate but it does measure danseur the brogan is a cytosol. sent2: if something is not a kind of a cytosol then that it does average brogan and it is a Tibicen is false. sent3: the start is a unpretentiousness. sent4: the brogan is a Myrmeleon. sent5: that the balminess does suppurate and is seasonable does not hold if the start does not suppurate. sent6: the balminess is a kind of a Tibicen if that it does not suppurate and measures danseur is incorrect. sent7: if something is both a cytosol and a Myrmeleon then it is not a kind of a provost. sent8: the start is not a Tibicen if there exists something such that the fact that it is a unpretentiousness and a Tibicen is not right. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a unpretentiousness and a Tibicen does not hold. sent10: that the Fula is not a provost but it is a Romanal is wrong if the brogan is not a provost. sent11: that the start does average brogan but it is not a kind of a Tibicen is not correct if the balminess is a Tibicen. sent12: the fact that the balminess is a kind of a Myrmeleon and is not a kind of a Tibicen is not true. sent13: the fact that that the brogan is both not a cytosol and a provost is not right is not wrong if the start is not a kind of a cytosol. sent14: the balminess does measure danseur. sent15: the start is not a kind of a Tibicen if there is something such that it is not a unpretentiousness. sent16: there exists something such that it is a unpretentiousness and it is a Tibicen. sent17: the start does average brogan and is seasonable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the balminess does not suppurate but it measures danseur is wrong is correct.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the balminess is a Tibicen.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the start does average brogan and is not a Tibicen is wrong.; sent17 -> int3: the start does average brogan.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the start is not a Tibicen hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the start averages brogan but it is not a kind of a Tibicen.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the balminess does not suppurate but it does measure danseur.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the fact that the brogan is a cytosol is right.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the brogan is a kind of a cytosol and it is a kind of a Myrmeleon.; sent7 -> int10: the fact that the brogan is not a provost hold if it is a kind of a cytosol and it is a Myrmeleon.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the brogan is not a kind of a provost.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__