the fact that there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a rein and does not encircle claim hold it is androgenic is not right.
sent1: if something that is not a kind of a storehouse is not inconclusive then it is caffeinic. sent2: if the balaclava does not encircle Oregonian and is not a chloroplast that it is a Cronartium is correct. sent3: the Oregonian is androgenic if it is not a rein and it does not encircle claim.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that there is something such that if it is both not a storehouse and not inconclusive it is caffeinic is right.
sent1 -> int1: if the packing is not a storehouse and is not inconclusive it is caffeinic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a rein and does not encircle claim hold it is androgenic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a kind of a storehouse is not inconclusive then it is caffeinic. sent2: if the balaclava does not encircle Oregonian and is not a chloroplast that it is a Cronartium is correct. sent3: the Oregonian is androgenic if it is not a rein and it does not encircle claim. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__