there is something such that if it does deaminate prop then it is a kind of a jingle.
sent1: if that something is a splinter and is not a anomalopteryx does not hold it is not tasty. sent2: the fact that something owns setting but it is not a floating does not hold if it is not a kind of a machicolation. sent3: if the trichopteran is tasty it is supportive. sent4: the pledger does not peck retailing. sent5: if that something is a Adriatic and not a Tarzan is not right it is not a litigiousness. sent6: something is a kind of a jingle and it does deaminate prop if it does not own setting. sent7: if the pledger is not a kind of a Adriatic then it is not a litigiousness. sent8: if the trisaccharide deaminates prop then the pledger is pubic. sent9: that the prop is the Adriatic if the prop is not a ram is not wrong. sent10: something is a kind of a jingle if it is not a kind of a litigiousness. sent11: the trichopteran is tasty. sent12: the fact that the trichopteran does not own setting and is a machicolation is wrong. sent13: if that something does not deaminate prop and it is not a kind of a litigiousness does not hold then it is not a Christie. sent14: if the pledger is a haploid it does not frolic. sent15: a sob is not fugal. sent16: something is not a machicolation if it is a Achaean and it is not a Anglican. sent17: if that something owns setting but it does not float is incorrect then it does not jingle. sent18: the seventy-eight is not a kind of a jingle. sent19: if the pledger is both a Adriatic and not a Tarzan then it does deaminate prop. sent20: if that something is not a kind of a Adriatic is right it is not a litigiousness. sent21: the pledger does not deaminate prop if it is a kind of a Adriatic that is not a Tarzan. sent22: if the fact that the trisaccharide is a jingle is wrong that that the pledger does not deaminate prop and it is not a litigiousness is correct does not hold. sent23: the fact that the pledger is a Adriatic is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the pledger is a Adriatic but it is not a Tarzan is true.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the pledger does not deaminate prop.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pledger does deaminate prop.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the pledger is a Adriatic but it is not a Tarzan is incorrect.; sent5 -> int4: if that the pledger is a Adriatic and not a Tarzan is incorrect it is not a kind of a litigiousness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the pledger is not a litigiousness is not incorrect.; sent10 -> int6: the fact that the pledger is a kind of a jingle hold if it is not a litigiousness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the pledger is a kind of a jingle.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the pledger is a jingle if it does deaminate prop.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the pledger is not a Christie.
sent13 -> int9: if that the pledger does not deaminate prop and it is not a kind of a litigiousness does not hold it is not a Christie.; sent17 -> int10: the trisaccharide does not jingle if that it does own setting and is not a kind of a floating is wrong.; sent2 -> int11: if the trisaccharide is not a machicolation then that it owns setting and it does not float is not true.; sent16 -> int12: the trisaccharide is not a kind of a machicolation if it is a kind of Achaean thing that is not a kind of a Anglican.; sent3 & sent11 -> int13: the trichopteran is supportive.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is supportive.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does deaminate prop then it is a kind of a jingle. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a splinter and is not a anomalopteryx does not hold it is not tasty. sent2: the fact that something owns setting but it is not a floating does not hold if it is not a kind of a machicolation. sent3: if the trichopteran is tasty it is supportive. sent4: the pledger does not peck retailing. sent5: if that something is a Adriatic and not a Tarzan is not right it is not a litigiousness. sent6: something is a kind of a jingle and it does deaminate prop if it does not own setting. sent7: if the pledger is not a kind of a Adriatic then it is not a litigiousness. sent8: if the trisaccharide deaminates prop then the pledger is pubic. sent9: that the prop is the Adriatic if the prop is not a ram is not wrong. sent10: something is a kind of a jingle if it is not a kind of a litigiousness. sent11: the trichopteran is tasty. sent12: the fact that the trichopteran does not own setting and is a machicolation is wrong. sent13: if that something does not deaminate prop and it is not a kind of a litigiousness does not hold then it is not a Christie. sent14: if the pledger is a haploid it does not frolic. sent15: a sob is not fugal. sent16: something is not a machicolation if it is a Achaean and it is not a Anglican. sent17: if that something owns setting but it does not float is incorrect then it does not jingle. sent18: the seventy-eight is not a kind of a jingle. sent19: if the pledger is both a Adriatic and not a Tarzan then it does deaminate prop. sent20: if that something is not a kind of a Adriatic is right it is not a litigiousness. sent21: the pledger does not deaminate prop if it is a kind of a Adriatic that is not a Tarzan. sent22: if the fact that the trisaccharide is a jingle is wrong that that the pledger does not deaminate prop and it is not a litigiousness is correct does not hold. sent23: the fact that the pledger is a Adriatic is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the pledger is a Adriatic but it is not a Tarzan is true.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the pledger does not deaminate prop.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pledger does deaminate prop.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the pledger is a Adriatic but it is not a Tarzan is incorrect.; sent5 -> int4: if that the pledger is a Adriatic and not a Tarzan is incorrect it is not a kind of a litigiousness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the pledger is not a litigiousness is not incorrect.; sent10 -> int6: the fact that the pledger is a kind of a jingle hold if it is not a litigiousness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the pledger is a kind of a jingle.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the pledger is a jingle if it does deaminate prop.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__