if the layette is a suricate the basil is a collimation.
sent1: if the naproxen is a suricate then the panorama is a suricate. sent2: there exists something such that that it is both not Methodists and not a nude does not hold. sent3: that the wishbone does flounder determent but it is not a dawn is not incorrect. sent4: if something is not inextricable it is a suricate and it engulfs. sent5: the layette does not rap Pelobatidae if the fact that the naproxen is aciculate and churns concavity is not true. sent6: that the basil is a kind of a collimation is true if the layette does not rap Pelobatidae but it is a suricate. sent7: the basil is not a suricate. sent8: the fact that the naproxen is aciculate and it churns concavity is not true if the panorama is not a marbled. sent9: the naproxen is not a kind of a collimation if that the basil is aciculate and it is a kind of a suricate does not hold. sent10: the wishbone is a marbled but it is not a dawn. sent11: something is not non-aciculate but it is not a kind of a collimation if it is a marbled. sent12: if the naproxen does not churn concavity then the layette does not rap Pelobatidae. sent13: if the panorama is a suricate it does not churn concavity or it does not rap Pelobatidae or both. sent14: the naproxen is not inextricable if there is something such that that it is not Methodists and not a nude is wrong. sent15: if the wishbone flounders determent and dawns then the fact that the panorama is not a marbled is true. sent16: the panorama is not a marbled if the wishbone flounders determent but it is not a kind of a dawn.
sent16 & sent3 -> int1: the panorama does not marble.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the naproxen is not non-aciculate and churns concavity is not right.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the layette does not rap Pelobatidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the layette is a suricate.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the layette does not rap Pelobatidae but it is a suricate.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the basil is a collimation.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the wishbone is not a collimation.
sent11 -> int6: the wishbone is aciculate but not a collimation if it does marble.; sent4 -> int7: the fact that the naproxen is a kind of the suricate that does engulf if the naproxen is not inextricable hold.; sent2 & sent14 -> int8: the naproxen is not inextricable.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the naproxen is a suricate and does engulf.; int9 -> int10: the naproxen is a kind of a suricate.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the panorama is a kind of a suricate.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the panorama does not churn concavity and/or does not rap Pelobatidae.; int12 -> int13: something does not churn concavity or it does not rap Pelobatidae or both.;
$hypothesis$ = if the layette is a suricate the basil is a collimation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the naproxen is a suricate then the panorama is a suricate. sent2: there exists something such that that it is both not Methodists and not a nude does not hold. sent3: that the wishbone does flounder determent but it is not a dawn is not incorrect. sent4: if something is not inextricable it is a suricate and it engulfs. sent5: the layette does not rap Pelobatidae if the fact that the naproxen is aciculate and churns concavity is not true. sent6: that the basil is a kind of a collimation is true if the layette does not rap Pelobatidae but it is a suricate. sent7: the basil is not a suricate. sent8: the fact that the naproxen is aciculate and it churns concavity is not true if the panorama is not a marbled. sent9: the naproxen is not a kind of a collimation if that the basil is aciculate and it is a kind of a suricate does not hold. sent10: the wishbone is a marbled but it is not a dawn. sent11: something is not non-aciculate but it is not a kind of a collimation if it is a marbled. sent12: if the naproxen does not churn concavity then the layette does not rap Pelobatidae. sent13: if the panorama is a suricate it does not churn concavity or it does not rap Pelobatidae or both. sent14: the naproxen is not inextricable if there is something such that that it is not Methodists and not a nude is wrong. sent15: if the wishbone flounders determent and dawns then the fact that the panorama is not a marbled is true. sent16: the panorama is not a marbled if the wishbone flounders determent but it is not a kind of a dawn. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent3 -> int1: the panorama does not marble.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the naproxen is not non-aciculate and churns concavity is not right.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the layette does not rap Pelobatidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the layette is a suricate.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the layette does not rap Pelobatidae but it is a suricate.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the basil is a collimation.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__