the monotreme tyrannizes tribalization.
sent1: a non-Belgian thing is a epicycle and is acetonic. sent2: the fact that the aster is not a Anglican is correct. sent3: the aster is not an affirmative and it is not a Victrola. sent4: something is not neurobiological if either it is not neurobiological or it is not a Taiwanese or both. sent5: if that the aster is acetonic thing that is a epicycle is not correct then the cochineal is not Belgian. sent6: if a non-affirmative thing is not a Victrola the perfumery is not a Belgian. sent7: if the tropopause is not neurobiological that the mustachio does tyrannize tribalization and is a kind of a Anglican is not correct. sent8: the aster is not a Taiwanese if the perfumery is not neurobiological and it is not katabatic. sent9: the perfumery is a kind of a orchiopexy. sent10: if something is not Belgian then it is a Victrola. sent11: that that something is acetonic and it is a epicycle does not hold if it is not a kind of a Taiwanese is not false. sent12: the cochineal is not a Saratov. sent13: that the monotreme is a Victrola and it tyrannizes tribalization does not hold if it is not neurobiological. sent14: if the aster is a kind of a Taiwanese and it is katabatic then the perfumery is a epicycle. sent15: the fact that the monotreme does tyrannize tribalization if the cochineal is a Victrola is not false. sent16: the tropopause is a kind of a Anglican if the mustachio is ascosporic but it does not tyrannize instructorship. sent17: the perfumery is not katabatic. sent18: something is not neurobiological and/or it is not a Taiwanese if it is katabatic. sent19: the perfumery is not neurobiological if the tropopause is a Anglican. sent20: the mustachio is ascosporic but it does not tyrannize instructorship. sent21: the tropopause is katabatic if the perfumery is a epicycle.
sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the tropopause is a Anglican.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the perfumery is not neurobiological.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the perfumery is not neurobiological and it is not katabatic.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the aster is not a kind of a Taiwanese.; sent11 -> int5: if the aster is not a Taiwanese then the fact that it is not non-acetonic but a epicycle is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the aster is both acetonic and a epicycle is not true.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the cochineal is not Belgian.; sent10 -> int8: if the cochineal is non-Belgian it is a kind of a Victrola.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the cochineal is a Victrola.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the monotreme does not tyrannize tribalization is right.
sent4 -> int10: the tropopause is not neurobiological if it is not neurobiological and/or it is not a Taiwanese.; sent18 -> int11: the tropopause is either not neurobiological or not Taiwanese or both if the fact that it is katabatic is true.; sent1 -> int12: if the perfumery is not a kind of a Belgian then it is a kind of a epicycle and it is acetonic.; sent3 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not an affirmative and is not a kind of a Victrola.; int13 & sent6 -> int14: the perfumery is not a kind of a Belgian.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the perfumery is a kind of a epicycle that is acetonic.; int15 -> int16: the perfumery is a epicycle.; sent21 & int16 -> int17: the tropopause is katabatic.; int11 & int17 -> int18: either the tropopause is not neurobiological or it is not Taiwanese or both.; int10 & int18 -> int19: the tropopause is not neurobiological.; sent7 & int19 -> int20: the fact that the mustachio does tyrannize tribalization and it is a kind of a Anglican is incorrect.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that the fact that it tyrannizes tribalization and is a Anglican does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the monotreme tyrannizes tribalization. ; $context$ = sent1: a non-Belgian thing is a epicycle and is acetonic. sent2: the fact that the aster is not a Anglican is correct. sent3: the aster is not an affirmative and it is not a Victrola. sent4: something is not neurobiological if either it is not neurobiological or it is not a Taiwanese or both. sent5: if that the aster is acetonic thing that is a epicycle is not correct then the cochineal is not Belgian. sent6: if a non-affirmative thing is not a Victrola the perfumery is not a Belgian. sent7: if the tropopause is not neurobiological that the mustachio does tyrannize tribalization and is a kind of a Anglican is not correct. sent8: the aster is not a Taiwanese if the perfumery is not neurobiological and it is not katabatic. sent9: the perfumery is a kind of a orchiopexy. sent10: if something is not Belgian then it is a Victrola. sent11: that that something is acetonic and it is a epicycle does not hold if it is not a kind of a Taiwanese is not false. sent12: the cochineal is not a Saratov. sent13: that the monotreme is a Victrola and it tyrannizes tribalization does not hold if it is not neurobiological. sent14: if the aster is a kind of a Taiwanese and it is katabatic then the perfumery is a epicycle. sent15: the fact that the monotreme does tyrannize tribalization if the cochineal is a Victrola is not false. sent16: the tropopause is a kind of a Anglican if the mustachio is ascosporic but it does not tyrannize instructorship. sent17: the perfumery is not katabatic. sent18: something is not neurobiological and/or it is not a Taiwanese if it is katabatic. sent19: the perfumery is not neurobiological if the tropopause is a Anglican. sent20: the mustachio is ascosporic but it does not tyrannize instructorship. sent21: the tropopause is katabatic if the perfumery is a epicycle. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the tropopause is a Anglican.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the perfumery is not neurobiological.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the perfumery is not neurobiological and it is not katabatic.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the aster is not a kind of a Taiwanese.; sent11 -> int5: if the aster is not a Taiwanese then the fact that it is not non-acetonic but a epicycle is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the aster is both acetonic and a epicycle is not true.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the cochineal is not Belgian.; sent10 -> int8: if the cochineal is non-Belgian it is a kind of a Victrola.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the cochineal is a Victrola.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__