the upheaving occurs if the astomatalness happens.
sent1: that the piquing does not occur and the obtainment does not occur does not hold. sent2: the astomatalness does not occur if the settling prohibition does not occur. sent3: that the scentlessness occurs and/or that the emblazoning flan does not occur prevents that the negligentness occurs. sent4: the scentlessness happens or the emblazoning flan does not occur or both if the deviation occurs. sent5: if the revenging monopolization happens then the non-bubalineness and/or the thirstiness occurs. sent6: the nonconformity does not occur if either the bubalineness does not occur or the thirstiness occurs or both. sent7: the mediatorialness does not occur if the emblazoning nigger happens. sent8: if the fact that the antigenicness occurs and the exclusion does not occur does not hold the smasher does not occur. sent9: that the revenging monopolization happens is caused by that the rearrangement does not occur and the antibioticness does not occur. sent10: if the emblazoning Beatrice occurs then the fact that the antigenicness but not the exclusion happens does not hold. sent11: the rededication does not occur if the fact that the settling prohibition happens and the astomatalness happens is incorrect. sent12: that the upheaving happens hold if the emblazoning flan does not occur and the scentlessness does not occur. sent13: that the settling prohibition does not occur brings about the astomatalness. sent14: the upheaving does not occur if either the settling analogue happens or the netball does not occur or both. sent15: if the smasher does not occur the settling analogue happens or the netball does not occur or both. sent16: that the bioterrorism does not occur and the cackling does not occur is brought about by that the nonconformity does not occur. sent17: that both the revenging monopolization and the initiating Wolof occurs is triggered by the non-negligentness. sent18: the emblazoning nigger and the hurdling occurs if the bioterrorism does not occur. sent19: the deviation occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the astomatalness happens.;
the mediatorialness does not occur and the rededication does not occur.
sent4 & sent19 -> int1: the scentlessness happens and/or the emblazoning flan does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the negligentness does not occur.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the revenging monopolization and the initiating Wolof occurs.; int3 -> int4: the revenging monopolization happens.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the bubalineness does not occur and/or the thirstiness happens.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the nonconformity does not occur.; sent16 & int6 -> int7: the bioterrorism does not occur and the cackling does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the bioterrorism does not occur is not wrong.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: both the emblazoning nigger and the hurdle happens.; int9 -> int10: the emblazoning nigger occurs.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the mediatorialness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the upheaving occurs if the astomatalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the piquing does not occur and the obtainment does not occur does not hold. sent2: the astomatalness does not occur if the settling prohibition does not occur. sent3: that the scentlessness occurs and/or that the emblazoning flan does not occur prevents that the negligentness occurs. sent4: the scentlessness happens or the emblazoning flan does not occur or both if the deviation occurs. sent5: if the revenging monopolization happens then the non-bubalineness and/or the thirstiness occurs. sent6: the nonconformity does not occur if either the bubalineness does not occur or the thirstiness occurs or both. sent7: the mediatorialness does not occur if the emblazoning nigger happens. sent8: if the fact that the antigenicness occurs and the exclusion does not occur does not hold the smasher does not occur. sent9: that the revenging monopolization happens is caused by that the rearrangement does not occur and the antibioticness does not occur. sent10: if the emblazoning Beatrice occurs then the fact that the antigenicness but not the exclusion happens does not hold. sent11: the rededication does not occur if the fact that the settling prohibition happens and the astomatalness happens is incorrect. sent12: that the upheaving happens hold if the emblazoning flan does not occur and the scentlessness does not occur. sent13: that the settling prohibition does not occur brings about the astomatalness. sent14: the upheaving does not occur if either the settling analogue happens or the netball does not occur or both. sent15: if the smasher does not occur the settling analogue happens or the netball does not occur or both. sent16: that the bioterrorism does not occur and the cackling does not occur is brought about by that the nonconformity does not occur. sent17: that both the revenging monopolization and the initiating Wolof occurs is triggered by the non-negligentness. sent18: the emblazoning nigger and the hurdling occurs if the bioterrorism does not occur. sent19: the deviation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the astomatalness happens.; __UNKNOWN__