the clucking does not occur and/or the makeshift does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the void does not occur is correct then the fact that either the cluck does not occur or the makeshift does not occur or both is wrong. sent2: that the blot does not occur is correct. sent3: that the cluck occurs and/or the makeshift does not occur hold. sent4: the blot happens if the fact that either the cluck does not occur or the makeshift does not occur or both is not right. sent5: the blot occurs if that the cluck happens and/or the makeshift does not occur is wrong. sent6: that the imperiousness occurs leads to that not the voiding but the blot occurs. sent7: the cluck occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the clucking does not occur or the makeshift does not occur or both does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the blot occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the clucking does not occur or the makeshift does not occur or both does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the clucking does not occur and/or the makeshift does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the void does not occur is correct then the fact that either the cluck does not occur or the makeshift does not occur or both is wrong. sent2: that the blot does not occur is correct. sent3: that the cluck occurs and/or the makeshift does not occur hold. sent4: the blot happens if the fact that either the cluck does not occur or the makeshift does not occur or both is not right. sent5: the blot occurs if that the cluck happens and/or the makeshift does not occur is wrong. sent6: that the imperiousness occurs leads to that not the voiding but the blot occurs. sent7: the cluck occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the clucking does not occur or the makeshift does not occur or both does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the blot occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__