there exists something such that if it is monatomic it is not environmental.
sent1: there is something such that if it is fibrillose that it does not dogmatize Hoenir is correct. sent2: there is something such that if it is monatomic it is environmental. sent3: the triclinium is not a kind of a drydock if it is monatomic. sent4: if the triclinium is monatomic it is not environmental. sent5: the fact that there is something such that if it is juridical then it is not a kind of a Dipsacus is not false. sent6: if the triclinium is environmental then it is not successful. sent7: if the triclinium is a symposiast then it is not environmental. sent8: there exists something such that if it dogmatizes sailcloth then it is not oscine. sent9: if the pyrograph is a spinet then it is not environmental. sent10: if the triclinium is monatomic then it is not a kind of a louse. sent11: there exists something such that if it faces then it does not dogmatize metamere. sent12: the triclinium does not staple delay if it is monatomic. sent13: that there exists something such that if it does palaver it is not chronic hold. sent14: if the triclinium is monatomic then it is environmental. sent15: if the triclinium does staple fedayeen then it does not acquaint Montpelier. sent16: if something is a protuberance then it is not monatomic. sent17: the bilocation does not dogmatize sailcloth if it is diclinous. sent18: the triclinium is not monatomic if it is adjudicative. sent19: there exists something such that if it does dogmatize banking it does not dogmatize Pleione.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
if the triclinium is a kind of a protuberance then it is not monatomic.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is monatomic it is not environmental. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is fibrillose that it does not dogmatize Hoenir is correct. sent2: there is something such that if it is monatomic it is environmental. sent3: the triclinium is not a kind of a drydock if it is monatomic. sent4: if the triclinium is monatomic it is not environmental. sent5: the fact that there is something such that if it is juridical then it is not a kind of a Dipsacus is not false. sent6: if the triclinium is environmental then it is not successful. sent7: if the triclinium is a symposiast then it is not environmental. sent8: there exists something such that if it dogmatizes sailcloth then it is not oscine. sent9: if the pyrograph is a spinet then it is not environmental. sent10: if the triclinium is monatomic then it is not a kind of a louse. sent11: there exists something such that if it faces then it does not dogmatize metamere. sent12: the triclinium does not staple delay if it is monatomic. sent13: that there exists something such that if it does palaver it is not chronic hold. sent14: if the triclinium is monatomic then it is environmental. sent15: if the triclinium does staple fedayeen then it does not acquaint Montpelier. sent16: if something is a protuberance then it is not monatomic. sent17: the bilocation does not dogmatize sailcloth if it is diclinous. sent18: the triclinium is not monatomic if it is adjudicative. sent19: there exists something such that if it does dogmatize banking it does not dogmatize Pleione. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__