the gatekeeper is not a switchboard.
sent1: The fact that the bicycling does not perseverate annuitant is not incorrect. sent2: the diorite is telegraphic. sent3: the fact that the annuitant does not perseverate bicycling is not incorrect. sent4: the eyelid does perseverate diorite if the annuitant does not perseverate diorite and it is not unexpendable. sent5: that the annuitant is a abstractor is not false. sent6: the annuitant does not perseverate diorite and it is not unexpendable if there are mutable things. sent7: the gatekeeper is not a switchboard if the hazelnut is unexpendable and/or it is mutable. sent8: the spitball is not a millionaire. sent9: the hazelnut is unexpendable and/or it does perseverate bicycling. sent10: if something does perseverate diorite it is a switchboard. sent11: if something is mutable it is a switchboard. sent12: if the diorite is a kind of a millionaire the hazelnut does perseverate diorite. sent13: the gatekeeper perseverates bicycling and does not perseverate diorite if the annuitant is unexpendable. sent14: if there is something such that it is not intradepartmental then the diorite does not obliterate and suggests Mason. sent15: if something perseverates bicycling then it is a switchboard. sent16: that something is unexpendable is right if it does perseverate diorite. sent17: if something is a switchboard but it is not unhealthy it is mutable. sent18: something is a switchboard and healthy if the fact that it suggests Mason is true. sent19: the gatekeeper is not a switchboard if the hazelnut is mutable. sent20: if the annuitant does not perseverate bicycling then the diorite is either a anopia or a millionaire or both. sent21: the annuitant is a millionaire. sent22: there are non-intradepartmental things. sent23: the annuitant is unexpendable if the diorite is unexpendable and immutable. sent24: if the diorite is a anopia the hazelnut does perseverate diorite.
sent20 & sent3 -> int1: the diorite is a anopia and/or a millionaire.; int1 & sent24 & sent12 -> int2: the hazelnut does perseverate diorite.; sent16 -> int3: the hazelnut is unexpendable if it perseverates diorite.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hazelnut is unexpendable.; int4 -> int5: the hazelnut is unexpendable and/or it is mutable.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the gatekeeper is a kind of a switchboard.
sent15 -> int6: the gatekeeper is a switchboard if it does perseverate bicycling.;
$hypothesis$ = the gatekeeper is not a switchboard. ; $context$ = sent1: The fact that the bicycling does not perseverate annuitant is not incorrect. sent2: the diorite is telegraphic. sent3: the fact that the annuitant does not perseverate bicycling is not incorrect. sent4: the eyelid does perseverate diorite if the annuitant does not perseverate diorite and it is not unexpendable. sent5: that the annuitant is a abstractor is not false. sent6: the annuitant does not perseverate diorite and it is not unexpendable if there are mutable things. sent7: the gatekeeper is not a switchboard if the hazelnut is unexpendable and/or it is mutable. sent8: the spitball is not a millionaire. sent9: the hazelnut is unexpendable and/or it does perseverate bicycling. sent10: if something does perseverate diorite it is a switchboard. sent11: if something is mutable it is a switchboard. sent12: if the diorite is a kind of a millionaire the hazelnut does perseverate diorite. sent13: the gatekeeper perseverates bicycling and does not perseverate diorite if the annuitant is unexpendable. sent14: if there is something such that it is not intradepartmental then the diorite does not obliterate and suggests Mason. sent15: if something perseverates bicycling then it is a switchboard. sent16: that something is unexpendable is right if it does perseverate diorite. sent17: if something is a switchboard but it is not unhealthy it is mutable. sent18: something is a switchboard and healthy if the fact that it suggests Mason is true. sent19: the gatekeeper is not a switchboard if the hazelnut is mutable. sent20: if the annuitant does not perseverate bicycling then the diorite is either a anopia or a millionaire or both. sent21: the annuitant is a millionaire. sent22: there are non-intradepartmental things. sent23: the annuitant is unexpendable if the diorite is unexpendable and immutable. sent24: if the diorite is a anopia the hazelnut does perseverate diorite. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent3 -> int1: the diorite is a anopia and/or a millionaire.; int1 & sent24 & sent12 -> int2: the hazelnut does perseverate diorite.; sent16 -> int3: the hazelnut is unexpendable if it perseverates diorite.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hazelnut is unexpendable.; int4 -> int5: the hazelnut is unexpendable and/or it is mutable.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__