the spectroscopicness occurs.
sent1: that the u-turn does not occur brings about that the gluttonousness occurs and/or that the indestructibleness does not occur. sent2: that the charming horse happens is brought about by the crumbling. sent3: the fact that the patching happens and the scrimmaging happens is wrong if the ricing Gymnocalycium does not occur. sent4: the existentialist happens. sent5: if the tracklessness does not occur then that both the beam and the ding-dong happens is false. sent6: if the gluttonousness does not occur then that that both the beguine and the vertebrate occurs is not right is not incorrect. sent7: that the beguine but not the vertebrateness occurs is incorrect if the gluttonousness does not occur. sent8: the dimmedness happens if that the judging grief occurs but the kindling does not occur does not hold. sent9: the evisceration occurs if the charming soccer happens. sent10: the snagging Thompson happens. sent11: that the ricing naloxone occurs is right. sent12: that the thimblerig occurs but the cerebellarness does not occur is false. sent13: the gluttonousness does not occur. sent14: if that both the beguine and the invertebrateness occurs is not true then that the indestructibleness occurs is true. sent15: that the recidivism happens and the u-turn occurs is false if the alternation does not occur. sent16: if the snagging equine happens then the fact that the cuticularness occurs is right. sent17: that both the beguine and the vertebrateness happens is not right. sent18: the diazoness occurs if the phonicsness happens. sent19: the indestructibleness occurs if the vertebrateness happens. sent20: the ricing rebellion occurs. sent21: the charming jazzman occurs.
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that both the beguine and the invertebrateness occurs is wrong.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the indestructibleness happens.;
the spectroscopicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the spectroscopicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the u-turn does not occur brings about that the gluttonousness occurs and/or that the indestructibleness does not occur. sent2: that the charming horse happens is brought about by the crumbling. sent3: the fact that the patching happens and the scrimmaging happens is wrong if the ricing Gymnocalycium does not occur. sent4: the existentialist happens. sent5: if the tracklessness does not occur then that both the beam and the ding-dong happens is false. sent6: if the gluttonousness does not occur then that that both the beguine and the vertebrate occurs is not right is not incorrect. sent7: that the beguine but not the vertebrateness occurs is incorrect if the gluttonousness does not occur. sent8: the dimmedness happens if that the judging grief occurs but the kindling does not occur does not hold. sent9: the evisceration occurs if the charming soccer happens. sent10: the snagging Thompson happens. sent11: that the ricing naloxone occurs is right. sent12: that the thimblerig occurs but the cerebellarness does not occur is false. sent13: the gluttonousness does not occur. sent14: if that both the beguine and the invertebrateness occurs is not true then that the indestructibleness occurs is true. sent15: that the recidivism happens and the u-turn occurs is false if the alternation does not occur. sent16: if the snagging equine happens then the fact that the cuticularness occurs is right. sent17: that both the beguine and the vertebrateness happens is not right. sent18: the diazoness occurs if the phonicsness happens. sent19: the indestructibleness occurs if the vertebrateness happens. sent20: the ricing rebellion occurs. sent21: the charming jazzman occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that both the beguine and the invertebrateness occurs is wrong.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the indestructibleness happens.; __UNKNOWN__