the knoll is not an extraterrestrial.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it does spot adaptability and/or it does not beat caste is correct. sent2: if the fact that either the muckraker is not a gratefulness or it is not a kind of an extraterrestrial or both is wrong the fact that the knoll is not an extraterrestrial is not false. sent3: if the muckraker does not spot siltstone and is not autodidactic then the jackknife is monotheistic. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that either it spots adaptability or it does not beat caste or both does not hold. sent5: that the siltstone is a kind of a gratefulness is not false if the jackknife is monotheistic. sent6: if there exists something such that that it spots adaptability and/or does not beat caste does not hold then the siltstone is not a gratefulness. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not spot siltstone and it is not autodidactic is not true the fact that the knoll is an extraterrestrial hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the muckraker does not spot siltstone and it is not autodidactic is not incorrect.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the jackknife is monotheistic.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the siltstone is a gratefulness.; sent4 & sent6 -> int3: the siltstone is not a kind of a gratefulness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the muckraker does not spot siltstone and it is not autodidactic is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it does not spot siltstone and is not autodidactic is incorrect.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the knoll is not an extraterrestrial is true.
$hypothesis$ = the knoll is not an extraterrestrial. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it does spot adaptability and/or it does not beat caste is correct. sent2: if the fact that either the muckraker is not a gratefulness or it is not a kind of an extraterrestrial or both is wrong the fact that the knoll is not an extraterrestrial is not false. sent3: if the muckraker does not spot siltstone and is not autodidactic then the jackknife is monotheistic. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that either it spots adaptability or it does not beat caste or both does not hold. sent5: that the siltstone is a kind of a gratefulness is not false if the jackknife is monotheistic. sent6: if there exists something such that that it spots adaptability and/or does not beat caste does not hold then the siltstone is not a gratefulness. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not spot siltstone and it is not autodidactic is not true the fact that the knoll is an extraterrestrial hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the muckraker does not spot siltstone and it is not autodidactic is not incorrect.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the jackknife is monotheistic.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the siltstone is a gratefulness.; sent4 & sent6 -> int3: the siltstone is not a kind of a gratefulness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the muckraker does not spot siltstone and it is not autodidactic is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it does not spot siltstone and is not autodidactic is incorrect.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__