the embrowning craton happens.
sent1: if the motoring happens that the embrowning boxer does not occur and the harshness does not occur is wrong. sent2: the stowing winged occurs. sent3: the staleness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the adsorbentness and/or the contingency happens is false then the stowing winged does not occur. sent5: if the purr does not occur then that the nonadsorbentness does not occur and/or the contingency occurs is not true. sent6: the oath does not occur if the stowing winged does not occur and the narrating does not occur. sent7: that the tonguelessness and the oath occurs prevents the embrowning craton. sent8: either the premenopausalness or that the oscineness occurs or both is brought about by that the staleness does not occur. sent9: the embrowning angled happens if the premenopausalness happens. sent10: if that the embrowning boxer does not occur and the harshness does not occur is not right then the purring does not occur. sent11: if the stowing winged occurs then the oath occurs. sent12: the fact that the unclothing messuage but not the exacerbation occurs hold. sent13: the motoring happens if the embrowning angled happens. sent14: the tonguelessness occurs if the unclothing messuage happens and the exacerbation does not occur. sent15: that the motoring does not occur is caused by that both the nonadsorbentness and the amble happens. sent16: if the oath does not occur then the fact that the fact that the embrowning craton does not occur and the tonguelessness does not occur hold is incorrect.
sent14 & sent12 -> int1: the tonguelessness occurs.; sent11 & sent2 -> int2: the oath happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tonguelessness occurs and the oath occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the embrowning craton happens.
sent8 & sent3 -> int4: either the premenopausalness happens or the oscineness happens or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the embrowning craton happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the motoring happens that the embrowning boxer does not occur and the harshness does not occur is wrong. sent2: the stowing winged occurs. sent3: the staleness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the adsorbentness and/or the contingency happens is false then the stowing winged does not occur. sent5: if the purr does not occur then that the nonadsorbentness does not occur and/or the contingency occurs is not true. sent6: the oath does not occur if the stowing winged does not occur and the narrating does not occur. sent7: that the tonguelessness and the oath occurs prevents the embrowning craton. sent8: either the premenopausalness or that the oscineness occurs or both is brought about by that the staleness does not occur. sent9: the embrowning angled happens if the premenopausalness happens. sent10: if that the embrowning boxer does not occur and the harshness does not occur is not right then the purring does not occur. sent11: if the stowing winged occurs then the oath occurs. sent12: the fact that the unclothing messuage but not the exacerbation occurs hold. sent13: the motoring happens if the embrowning angled happens. sent14: the tonguelessness occurs if the unclothing messuage happens and the exacerbation does not occur. sent15: that the motoring does not occur is caused by that both the nonadsorbentness and the amble happens. sent16: if the oath does not occur then the fact that the fact that the embrowning craton does not occur and the tonguelessness does not occur hold is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent12 -> int1: the tonguelessness occurs.; sent11 & sent2 -> int2: the oath happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tonguelessness occurs and the oath occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__