the fashionmonger is not masculine.
sent1: that the relief is not a kind of a Baku and/or is a Demogorgon does not hold. sent2: if something is a kind of a conceptualism it does prioritize rocketry. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a papoose and is not an auger is wrong then it is a wincey. sent4: if the gonif is not a wincey then the fact that the relief is not a kind of an auger but it is a Baku does not hold. sent5: the flagon does not heft dallisgrass and/or is not a wincey. sent6: if something does prioritize rocketry but it is not a conceptualism it is not a masculine. sent7: the fact that something is not a kind of a papoose and it is not a kind of an auger does not hold if it prioritizes rocketry. sent8: if the fact that the relief is not a Baku and/or is a Demogorgon is not correct then it is not a wincey. sent9: if that the relief is not an auger and is a Baku does not hold then the jodhpur is an auger. sent10: if the fashionmonger is not a masculine the jodhpur does not excel Burger and it is not orthodox. sent11: something is not a conceptualism and prioritizes rocketry if it is a papoose. sent12: if something that does not excel Burger is not orthodox the relief is a conceptualism. sent13: if something is not a Demogorgon and it is not orthodox the jodhpur is a wincey.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fashionmonger is not a kind of a masculine.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the jodhpur does not excel Burger and it is not orthodox.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not excel Burger and it is not orthodox.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the relief is a conceptualism is not incorrect.; sent2 -> int4: if the relief is a conceptualism then it prioritizes rocketry.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the relief prioritizes rocketry.; sent7 -> int6: if that the relief does prioritize rocketry is true the fact that it is not a papoose and it is not an auger is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the relief is not a papoose and not an auger is not right.; sent3 -> int8: the relief is a wincey if the fact that it is not a papoose and is not an auger does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the relief is a wincey.; sent8 & sent1 -> int10: the relief is not a wincey.; int9 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fashionmonger is not a masculine.
sent11 -> int12: the jodhpur is not a conceptualism and does prioritize rocketry if it is a papoose.;
$hypothesis$ = the fashionmonger is not masculine. ; $context$ = sent1: that the relief is not a kind of a Baku and/or is a Demogorgon does not hold. sent2: if something is a kind of a conceptualism it does prioritize rocketry. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a papoose and is not an auger is wrong then it is a wincey. sent4: if the gonif is not a wincey then the fact that the relief is not a kind of an auger but it is a Baku does not hold. sent5: the flagon does not heft dallisgrass and/or is not a wincey. sent6: if something does prioritize rocketry but it is not a conceptualism it is not a masculine. sent7: the fact that something is not a kind of a papoose and it is not a kind of an auger does not hold if it prioritizes rocketry. sent8: if the fact that the relief is not a Baku and/or is a Demogorgon is not correct then it is not a wincey. sent9: if that the relief is not an auger and is a Baku does not hold then the jodhpur is an auger. sent10: if the fashionmonger is not a masculine the jodhpur does not excel Burger and it is not orthodox. sent11: something is not a conceptualism and prioritizes rocketry if it is a papoose. sent12: if something that does not excel Burger is not orthodox the relief is a conceptualism. sent13: if something is not a Demogorgon and it is not orthodox the jodhpur is a wincey. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fashionmonger is not a kind of a masculine.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the jodhpur does not excel Burger and it is not orthodox.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not excel Burger and it is not orthodox.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the relief is a conceptualism is not incorrect.; sent2 -> int4: if the relief is a conceptualism then it prioritizes rocketry.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the relief prioritizes rocketry.; sent7 -> int6: if that the relief does prioritize rocketry is true the fact that it is not a papoose and it is not an auger is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the relief is not a papoose and not an auger is not right.; sent3 -> int8: the relief is a wincey if the fact that it is not a papoose and is not an auger does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the relief is a wincey.; sent8 & sent1 -> int10: the relief is not a wincey.; int9 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__