the antecedent leans antipruritic.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a takin then it leans antipruritic. sent2: if the baseball is not a kind of a takin then the tripod is not a Musaceae. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does not repot heads-up and is not albitic is incorrect then the baseball is not a takin. sent4: if the fact that the lemma is unpretentious a Musaceae does not hold then the antecedent does not lean antipruritic. sent5: the fact that the lemma is unpretentious thing that is a Musaceae is not correct if the tripod is not a Musaceae. sent6: the fact that the moccasin does not repot heads-up and is non-albitic is wrong. sent7: if that something is not ostentatious but it is not a Musaceae is not true the fact that it is not a takin hold. sent8: if something is not an incredulity then that it is both unpretentious and not a Musaceae is not true.
sent6 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not repot heads-up and it is not albitic does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the baseball is not a takin.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the tripod is not a kind of a Musaceae.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the lemma is a kind of unpretentious thing that is a Musaceae is wrong.; sent4 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the antecedent leans antipruritic.
sent1 -> int5: the antecedent does lean antipruritic if it is not a takin.; sent7 -> int6: the antecedent is not a takin if that it is unpretentious and is not a Musaceae is not true.; sent8 -> int7: if the antecedent is not a kind of an incredulity then that it is unpretentious and it is not a kind of a Musaceae does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the antecedent leans antipruritic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a takin then it leans antipruritic. sent2: if the baseball is not a kind of a takin then the tripod is not a Musaceae. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does not repot heads-up and is not albitic is incorrect then the baseball is not a takin. sent4: if the fact that the lemma is unpretentious a Musaceae does not hold then the antecedent does not lean antipruritic. sent5: the fact that the lemma is unpretentious thing that is a Musaceae is not correct if the tripod is not a Musaceae. sent6: the fact that the moccasin does not repot heads-up and is non-albitic is wrong. sent7: if that something is not ostentatious but it is not a Musaceae is not true the fact that it is not a takin hold. sent8: if something is not an incredulity then that it is both unpretentious and not a Musaceae is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not repot heads-up and it is not albitic does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the baseball is not a takin.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the tripod is not a kind of a Musaceae.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the lemma is a kind of unpretentious thing that is a Musaceae is wrong.; sent4 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__