that if the LPN does not hoodoo Sinhalese then the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush but it tells does not hold.
sent1: if the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush and does tell the LPN hoodoos Sinhalese. sent2: that something does deck Nicolson but it does not deck praya hold if it is not a seizure. sent3: if the LPN does not hoodoo Sinhalese that the minister tells is true. sent4: the minister is imperceptible. sent5: if the fact that something is not a indistinctness is correct it is a lunching or not a Culiacan or both. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a brooding and is not a Bahamian then the LPN is not diclinous. sent7: the LPN hoodoos Sinhalese if that the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush and does tell is not correct. sent8: something is a indistinctness but it is not a FHLMC if it is not diclinous. sent9: if the fact that the LPN does tell and it does hoodoo brittlebush does not hold then the minister does hoodoo Sinhalese. sent10: something that is not a masking is not a kind of a brooding and is not a Bahamian. sent11: the fact that the LPN does not hoodoo Sinhalese but it does tell if the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush is right. sent12: the locum is not a seizure if the esophagus is attachable but it is not a kind of a seizure. sent13: that that the detection either is not a ravine or does photosensitize Ob or both does not hold is not wrong if the gecko does not deck praya. sent14: the eagle does not hoodoo Sinhalese if that something is a lunching and/or it is not a Culiacan is right. sent15: if the minister does not hoodoo Sinhalese then the LPN does not hoodoo brittlebush but it tells. sent16: the minister is not a indistinctness if the LPN is a indistinctness and is not a FHLMC. sent17: if the locum does deck Nicolson but it does not deck praya then the gecko does not deck praya. sent18: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a ravine and/or it photosensitizes Ob is incorrect that the pooler does not mask is right. sent19: that the esophagus is a kind of attachable thing that is not a seizure hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush and tells is not right.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the LPN hoodoos Sinhalese.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the LPN does not hoodoo Sinhalese.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush and tells.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the eagle does not hoodoo Sinhalese is not incorrect.
sent5 -> int4: if the minister is not a indistinctness then either it is a lunching or it is not a Culiacan or both.; sent8 -> int5: the LPN is a kind of a indistinctness that is not a FHLMC if it is not diclinous.; sent10 -> int6: the pooler does not brood and it is not a Bahamian if the fact that it is not a kind of a masking is correct.; sent2 -> int7: that the locum does deck Nicolson but it does not deck praya hold if it is not a seizure.; sent12 & sent19 -> int8: the locum is not a seizure.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the locum decks Nicolson but it does not deck praya.; sent17 & int9 -> int10: the gecko does not deck praya.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the detection is not a ravine and/or it does photosensitize Ob is not true.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is not a ravine and/or it does photosensitize Ob does not hold.; int12 & sent18 -> int13: the pooler is not a masking.; int6 & int13 -> int14: the pooler does not brood and it is not Bahamian.; int14 -> int15: something does not brood and it is not a Bahamian.; int15 & sent6 -> int16: the fact that the LPN is non-diclinous is not false.; int5 & int16 -> int17: the LPN is a kind of a indistinctness but it is not a kind of a FHLMC.; sent16 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the minister is not a indistinctness hold.; int4 & int18 -> int19: the minister either is a lunching or is not a kind of a Culiacan or both.; int19 -> int20: something is a lunching or is not a Culiacan or both.; int20 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the LPN does not hoodoo Sinhalese then the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush but it tells does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush and does tell the LPN hoodoos Sinhalese. sent2: that something does deck Nicolson but it does not deck praya hold if it is not a seizure. sent3: if the LPN does not hoodoo Sinhalese that the minister tells is true. sent4: the minister is imperceptible. sent5: if the fact that something is not a indistinctness is correct it is a lunching or not a Culiacan or both. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a brooding and is not a Bahamian then the LPN is not diclinous. sent7: the LPN hoodoos Sinhalese if that the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush and does tell is not correct. sent8: something is a indistinctness but it is not a FHLMC if it is not diclinous. sent9: if the fact that the LPN does tell and it does hoodoo brittlebush does not hold then the minister does hoodoo Sinhalese. sent10: something that is not a masking is not a kind of a brooding and is not a Bahamian. sent11: the fact that the LPN does not hoodoo Sinhalese but it does tell if the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush is right. sent12: the locum is not a seizure if the esophagus is attachable but it is not a kind of a seizure. sent13: that that the detection either is not a ravine or does photosensitize Ob or both does not hold is not wrong if the gecko does not deck praya. sent14: the eagle does not hoodoo Sinhalese if that something is a lunching and/or it is not a Culiacan is right. sent15: if the minister does not hoodoo Sinhalese then the LPN does not hoodoo brittlebush but it tells. sent16: the minister is not a indistinctness if the LPN is a indistinctness and is not a FHLMC. sent17: if the locum does deck Nicolson but it does not deck praya then the gecko does not deck praya. sent18: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a ravine and/or it photosensitizes Ob is incorrect that the pooler does not mask is right. sent19: that the esophagus is a kind of attachable thing that is not a seizure hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush and tells is not right.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the LPN hoodoos Sinhalese.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the LPN does not hoodoo Sinhalese.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the minister does not hoodoo brittlebush and tells.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__