that the mutagen does not escalate hold.
sent1: the couverture is non-overhand. sent2: that the couverture does not refresh toxicology and is a scatophagy is wrong if that it is not overhand is correct. sent3: if the fact that something does not refresh toxicology but it is a scatophagy is wrong the fact that it is a Anglican is not false. sent4: if the couverture is a Anglican the mutagen escalates.
sent3 -> int1: if that the couverture does not refresh toxicology and is a kind of a scatophagy is not true then it is Anglican.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the couverture does not refresh toxicology but it is a kind of a scatophagy is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the couverture is a Anglican.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the mutagen does not escalate hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the couverture is non-overhand. sent2: that the couverture does not refresh toxicology and is a scatophagy is wrong if that it is not overhand is correct. sent3: if the fact that something does not refresh toxicology but it is a scatophagy is wrong the fact that it is a Anglican is not false. sent4: if the couverture is a Anglican the mutagen escalates. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if that the couverture does not refresh toxicology and is a kind of a scatophagy is not true then it is Anglican.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the couverture does not refresh toxicology but it is a kind of a scatophagy is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the couverture is a Anglican.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__