there is something such that if it is not a Congridae it is noninvasive and it is not unable.
sent1: that the luff is a kind of an anorthite but it is not a Balmoral is not correct. sent2: that the rattlesnake is a kind of a narcoleptic and it is genial does not hold. sent3: if the luff does not housekeep galea and it is not a Congridae it is a dolefulness. sent4: if something is not a Congridae then the fact that it is a pocketful that justifies Dostoyevsky is not right. sent5: if that the luff is a kind of a dolefulness is right it is noninvasive. sent6: the luff is able if the fact that it is an anorthite and is not a Balmoral is not right. sent7: if the fact that the rattlesnake is a narcoleptic that is genial is not correct then the luff does not housekeep galea.
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the luff does not housekeep galea.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the luff is not a Congridae.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the luff does not housekeep galea and is not a kind of a Congridae.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the luff is a kind of a dolefulness.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the luff is noninvasive is not wrong.; sent6 & sent1 -> int5: the luff is able.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the luff is noninvasive and it is able.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: if the luff is not a kind of a Congridae then it is noninvasive thing that is able.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the porkfish is a pocketful and justifies Dostoyevsky does not hold.
sent4 -> int8: that the porkfish is a pocketful and justifies Dostoyevsky is not right if it is not a Congridae.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a Congridae it is noninvasive and it is not unable. ; $context$ = sent1: that the luff is a kind of an anorthite but it is not a Balmoral is not correct. sent2: that the rattlesnake is a kind of a narcoleptic and it is genial does not hold. sent3: if the luff does not housekeep galea and it is not a Congridae it is a dolefulness. sent4: if something is not a Congridae then the fact that it is a pocketful that justifies Dostoyevsky is not right. sent5: if that the luff is a kind of a dolefulness is right it is noninvasive. sent6: the luff is able if the fact that it is an anorthite and is not a Balmoral is not right. sent7: if the fact that the rattlesnake is a narcoleptic that is genial is not correct then the luff does not housekeep galea. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the luff does not housekeep galea.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the luff is not a Congridae.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the luff does not housekeep galea and is not a kind of a Congridae.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the luff is a kind of a dolefulness.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the luff is noninvasive is not wrong.; sent6 & sent1 -> int5: the luff is able.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the luff is noninvasive and it is able.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: if the luff is not a kind of a Congridae then it is noninvasive thing that is able.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__