the angle does not instruct elaphure.
sent1: the angle is not a test. sent2: that if the angle is not the test then the angle is not inhumane and it does propitiate is right. sent3: The imposition does ramble angle. sent4: the fact that if something is not a kind of a Leda it is humane and it is a decoction hold. sent5: if something is not a test and/or it does axe half-caste then it is not a test. sent6: the angle does ramble imposition. sent7: the administrator is a shell and it is a kind of an opera. sent8: the angle instructs elaphure if the elaphure does ramble imposition. sent9: if something does ramble imposition and instructs elaphure then the fact that it is not humane is not false. sent10: the angle propitiates.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the angle does instruct elaphure hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the angle does ramble imposition and does instruct elaphure.; sent9 -> int2: the angle is not humane if it does ramble imposition and it instructs elaphure.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the angle is not humane.; sent2 & sent1 -> int4: the angle is humane and propitiates.; int4 -> int5: the angle is humane.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the globetrotter is not a Leda is true then it is humane a decoction.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the angle does not instruct elaphure. ; $context$ = sent1: the angle is not a test. sent2: that if the angle is not the test then the angle is not inhumane and it does propitiate is right. sent3: The imposition does ramble angle. sent4: the fact that if something is not a kind of a Leda it is humane and it is a decoction hold. sent5: if something is not a test and/or it does axe half-caste then it is not a test. sent6: the angle does ramble imposition. sent7: the administrator is a shell and it is a kind of an opera. sent8: the angle instructs elaphure if the elaphure does ramble imposition. sent9: if something does ramble imposition and instructs elaphure then the fact that it is not humane is not false. sent10: the angle propitiates. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the angle does instruct elaphure hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the angle does ramble imposition and does instruct elaphure.; sent9 -> int2: the angle is not humane if it does ramble imposition and it instructs elaphure.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the angle is not humane.; sent2 & sent1 -> int4: the angle is humane and propitiates.; int4 -> int5: the angle is humane.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__