there is something such that if the fact that it is not a transmission and it is a wicket-keeper is not correct that it is artful is false.
sent1: the defilade is not artful if that it is not a wicket-keeper is not false. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a transmission and is a wicket-keeper does not hold it is not artful. sent3: if the fact that the defilade is a kind of a transmission and it is a wicket-keeper is incorrect it is not artful. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a enginery but a bayou is wrong it is not a pisiform. sent5: if the fact that something is an escapee and it permutes Zeitgeist is not correct it is not a centerpiece. sent6: the defilade is artful if the fact that it is not a transmission but a wicket-keeper does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a transmission and it is a wicket-keeper is not incorrect it is not artful. sent8: something is artful if the fact that it is not a kind of a transmission and it is a kind of a wicket-keeper does not hold. sent9: something that is not a kind of a wicket-keeper is not artful. sent10: if the defilade is not a transmission but a wicket-keeper it is not artful. sent11: if that something is not a crazy but it is a flatbed is wrong then it does not immortalize defilade. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a transmission and is a wicket-keeper is not right then it is not non-artful. sent13: there is something such that if that it is not a wicket-keeper is not wrong then it is not artful. sent14: if the chromoplast is not a kind of a thermocoagulation but it checkmates Peziza it is not antrorse. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it checkmates chromoplast and is a backspin does not hold that it is not a crazy is right. sent16: something is not artful if the fact that it is a kind of a transmission and it is a wicket-keeper is incorrect. sent17: something that is both not a transmission and a wicket-keeper is not artful.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is not a transmission and it is a wicket-keeper is not correct that it is artful is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the defilade is not artful if that it is not a wicket-keeper is not false. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a transmission and is a wicket-keeper does not hold it is not artful. sent3: if the fact that the defilade is a kind of a transmission and it is a wicket-keeper is incorrect it is not artful. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a enginery but a bayou is wrong it is not a pisiform. sent5: if the fact that something is an escapee and it permutes Zeitgeist is not correct it is not a centerpiece. sent6: the defilade is artful if the fact that it is not a transmission but a wicket-keeper does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a transmission and it is a wicket-keeper is not incorrect it is not artful. sent8: something is artful if the fact that it is not a kind of a transmission and it is a kind of a wicket-keeper does not hold. sent9: something that is not a kind of a wicket-keeper is not artful. sent10: if the defilade is not a transmission but a wicket-keeper it is not artful. sent11: if that something is not a crazy but it is a flatbed is wrong then it does not immortalize defilade. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a transmission and is a wicket-keeper is not right then it is not non-artful. sent13: there is something such that if that it is not a wicket-keeper is not wrong then it is not artful. sent14: if the chromoplast is not a kind of a thermocoagulation but it checkmates Peziza it is not antrorse. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it checkmates chromoplast and is a backspin does not hold that it is not a crazy is right. sent16: something is not artful if the fact that it is a kind of a transmission and it is a wicket-keeper is incorrect. sent17: something that is both not a transmission and a wicket-keeper is not artful. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__