the walleye does not deglaze ramp and is vertebral.
sent1: the phonebook bars palate if something is a brouhaha. sent2: if the geographer does deglaze ballpoint then it does deglaze dunlin and is not a scabicide. sent3: if there is something such that it is not desirable then the broadcaster is unplayable thing that is not a kind of a brouhaha. sent4: the pyrope is cryonics if the walleye is not a Halenia but it is a Nipa. sent5: if that the phonebook does not deglaze ramp and it does not dissonate is incorrect the dunlin is not vertebral. sent6: that the pyrope is not a Halenia is right if there exists something such that it is a Nipa. sent7: something is a Nipa if that it is a kind of a Halenia and it is not a Nipa is wrong. sent8: that something is a Halenia and is not a Nipa does not hold if it does not dissonate. sent9: the fact that something does not deglaze ramp but it is vertebral is not right if it is a Nipa. sent10: if the geographer deglazes dunlin but it is not a kind of a scabicide the dandy does not deglazes dunlin. sent11: the fact that something does not deglaze ramp and it does not dissonate does not hold if it bars palate. sent12: the walleye does not deglaze ramp and is vertebral if the ramp is not a Nipa. sent13: the satchel is not desirable if something that does not deglaze dunlin is not a hydroflumethiazide. sent14: if the workwear is not a wanton the dandy is a kind of non-unequal thing that is not a hydroflumethiazide. sent15: the workwear is not a wanton. sent16: the walleye does not dissonate if the fact that it does dissonate and it does not bar palate is not true. sent17: the uniform is a brouhaha if the broadcaster is unplayable and is not a kind of a brouhaha. sent18: the ballpoint is not bacteriophagic. sent19: the geographer does deglaze ballpoint. sent20: the pyrope does dissonate. sent21: the fact that the pyrope is not a Halenia is not right if it dissonates.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ramp is a Nipa is correct.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a Nipa.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the pyrope is not a Halenia.; sent21 & sent20 -> int3: the pyrope is a Halenia.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the ramp is not a Nipa.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is cryonics.
sent11 -> int6: if the phonebook does bar palate then the fact that it does not deglaze ramp and it does not dissonate is not true.; sent2 & sent19 -> int7: the geographer does deglaze dunlin and is not a scabicide.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the dandy does not deglaze dunlin is not wrong.; sent14 & sent15 -> int9: the dandy is not unequal and is not a hydroflumethiazide.; int9 -> int10: the dandy is not a hydroflumethiazide.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the dandy does not deglaze dunlin and it is not a hydroflumethiazide.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it does not deglaze dunlin and is not a kind of a hydroflumethiazide.; int12 & sent13 -> int13: the fact that the satchel is not desirable is not false.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not desirable.; int14 & sent3 -> int15: the broadcaster is both unplayable and not a brouhaha.; sent17 & int15 -> int16: the uniform is a brouhaha.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is a brouhaha.; int17 & sent1 -> int18: the phonebook does bar palate.; int6 & int18 -> int19: the fact that the phonebook does not deglaze ramp and it does not dissonate does not hold.; sent5 & int19 -> int20: the dunlin is not vertebral.; int20 -> int21: something is not vertebral.;
$hypothesis$ = the walleye does not deglaze ramp and is vertebral. ; $context$ = sent1: the phonebook bars palate if something is a brouhaha. sent2: if the geographer does deglaze ballpoint then it does deglaze dunlin and is not a scabicide. sent3: if there is something such that it is not desirable then the broadcaster is unplayable thing that is not a kind of a brouhaha. sent4: the pyrope is cryonics if the walleye is not a Halenia but it is a Nipa. sent5: if that the phonebook does not deglaze ramp and it does not dissonate is incorrect the dunlin is not vertebral. sent6: that the pyrope is not a Halenia is right if there exists something such that it is a Nipa. sent7: something is a Nipa if that it is a kind of a Halenia and it is not a Nipa is wrong. sent8: that something is a Halenia and is not a Nipa does not hold if it does not dissonate. sent9: the fact that something does not deglaze ramp but it is vertebral is not right if it is a Nipa. sent10: if the geographer deglazes dunlin but it is not a kind of a scabicide the dandy does not deglazes dunlin. sent11: the fact that something does not deglaze ramp and it does not dissonate does not hold if it bars palate. sent12: the walleye does not deglaze ramp and is vertebral if the ramp is not a Nipa. sent13: the satchel is not desirable if something that does not deglaze dunlin is not a hydroflumethiazide. sent14: if the workwear is not a wanton the dandy is a kind of non-unequal thing that is not a hydroflumethiazide. sent15: the workwear is not a wanton. sent16: the walleye does not dissonate if the fact that it does dissonate and it does not bar palate is not true. sent17: the uniform is a brouhaha if the broadcaster is unplayable and is not a kind of a brouhaha. sent18: the ballpoint is not bacteriophagic. sent19: the geographer does deglaze ballpoint. sent20: the pyrope does dissonate. sent21: the fact that the pyrope is not a Halenia is not right if it dissonates. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ramp is a Nipa is correct.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a Nipa.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the pyrope is not a Halenia.; sent21 & sent20 -> int3: the pyrope is a Halenia.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the ramp is not a Nipa.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__