there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a finiteness and is a fluorine does not hold it is involuntary.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a finiteness and it is a fluorine then it is not voluntary. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a finiteness that is a kind of a fluorine is not correct then it is involuntary. sent3: if the fact that something does not expire servicing but it is gastroduodenal is not true then it is not gastroduodenal. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a finiteness then it is involuntary. sent5: if that the commissary is a finiteness and it is a fluorine is not correct then that it is involuntary is not incorrect. sent6: something that is involuntary is a kind of a finiteness. sent7: the fact that the commissary is a kurus is not false if that it is not a finiteness and it is a fluorine is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a fluorine then it is involuntary. sent9: if the tentorium is not involuntary it is inflectional. sent10: something is not voluntary if it is a kind of a kurus. sent11: the fact that something is staccato and is not a kind of a kurus does not hold if it is not gastroduodenal. sent12: the fence is a northerly if a non-geostrategic thing does broadside brazier. sent13: if something is intramolecular the fact that it is not geostrategic and does broadside brazier is not incorrect. sent14: the cattle expires hairsplitter if that it is a arthromere hold. sent15: if the jilt is not a canned and expires prepayment then it is a fluorine. sent16: if the fence is a kind of a northerly the fact that the commissary does not expire servicing but it is gastroduodenal is not true. sent17: if something is a Lahu it is intramolecular. sent18: the cattle is a arthromere. sent19: if the cattle does expire hairsplitter then it does not expire Occidentalism and is a Lahu. sent20: if the commissary is not a hunted then it is involuntary.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the commissary is not a finiteness but it is a fluorine is wrong.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the commissary is a kurus.; sent10 -> int2: if the commissary is a kurus then the fact that it is involuntary is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the commissary is involuntary.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the fact that the commissary is not a finiteness but it is a fluorine is incorrect then it is involuntary.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the hairsplitter is a finiteness.
sent6 -> int5: if the hairsplitter is involuntary then it is a finiteness.; sent11 -> int6: that the commissary is staccato but it is not a kurus is not right if it is not gastroduodenal.; sent3 -> int7: if the fact that that the commissary does not expire servicing and is gastroduodenal is true is not right that it is not gastroduodenal is true.; sent13 -> int8: if the cattle is intramolecular the fact that it is not geostrategic and broadsides brazier hold.; sent17 -> int9: if the cattle is a Lahu it is intramolecular.; sent14 & sent18 -> int10: the cattle does expire hairsplitter.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: the cattle does not expire Occidentalism but it is a Lahu.; int11 -> int12: the cattle is a Lahu.; int9 & int12 -> int13: the cattle is intramolecular.; int8 & int13 -> int14: the cattle is not geostrategic but it does broadside brazier.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it is non-geostrategic and broadsides brazier.; int15 & sent12 -> int16: the fence is a northerly.; sent16 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the commissary does not expire servicing but it is gastroduodenal does not hold.; int7 & int17 -> int18: that the commissary is not gastroduodenal is not wrong.; int6 & int18 -> int19: that the commissary is staccato but it is not a kurus is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a finiteness and is a fluorine does not hold it is involuntary. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a finiteness and it is a fluorine then it is not voluntary. sent2: there is something such that if that it is a finiteness that is a kind of a fluorine is not correct then it is involuntary. sent3: if the fact that something does not expire servicing but it is gastroduodenal is not true then it is not gastroduodenal. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a finiteness then it is involuntary. sent5: if that the commissary is a finiteness and it is a fluorine is not correct then that it is involuntary is not incorrect. sent6: something that is involuntary is a kind of a finiteness. sent7: the fact that the commissary is a kurus is not false if that it is not a finiteness and it is a fluorine is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a fluorine then it is involuntary. sent9: if the tentorium is not involuntary it is inflectional. sent10: something is not voluntary if it is a kind of a kurus. sent11: the fact that something is staccato and is not a kind of a kurus does not hold if it is not gastroduodenal. sent12: the fence is a northerly if a non-geostrategic thing does broadside brazier. sent13: if something is intramolecular the fact that it is not geostrategic and does broadside brazier is not incorrect. sent14: the cattle expires hairsplitter if that it is a arthromere hold. sent15: if the jilt is not a canned and expires prepayment then it is a fluorine. sent16: if the fence is a kind of a northerly the fact that the commissary does not expire servicing but it is gastroduodenal is not true. sent17: if something is a Lahu it is intramolecular. sent18: the cattle is a arthromere. sent19: if the cattle does expire hairsplitter then it does not expire Occidentalism and is a Lahu. sent20: if the commissary is not a hunted then it is involuntary. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the commissary is not a finiteness but it is a fluorine is wrong.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the commissary is a kurus.; sent10 -> int2: if the commissary is a kurus then the fact that it is involuntary is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the commissary is involuntary.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the fact that the commissary is not a finiteness but it is a fluorine is incorrect then it is involuntary.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__