the rig is a honeycomb.
sent1: the rig does not spray Forester. sent2: the mongoose does not spray Forester. sent3: if the fact that the projectionist is a Venetian but it does not transform does not hold that the butterfly is a Venetian is wrong. sent4: The Forester does not spray rig. sent5: if that something is not a bourn but it does spray Forester does not hold it does not honeycomb. sent6: that the rig does spray Forester but it is not diagnostic is not correct if the butterfly is not a Venetian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rig is not a bourn but it sprays Forester.; assump1 -> int1: that the rig does spray Forester hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the rig is not a bourn but it sprays Forester is not right.; sent5 -> int4: the rig is not a kind of a honeycomb if that it is not a bourn and it does spray Forester is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the safehold does honeycomb.
$hypothesis$ = the rig is a honeycomb. ; $context$ = sent1: the rig does not spray Forester. sent2: the mongoose does not spray Forester. sent3: if the fact that the projectionist is a Venetian but it does not transform does not hold that the butterfly is a Venetian is wrong. sent4: The Forester does not spray rig. sent5: if that something is not a bourn but it does spray Forester does not hold it does not honeycomb. sent6: that the rig does spray Forester but it is not diagnostic is not correct if the butterfly is not a Venetian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rig is not a bourn but it sprays Forester.; assump1 -> int1: that the rig does spray Forester hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the rig is not a bourn but it sprays Forester is not right.; sent5 -> int4: the rig is not a kind of a honeycomb if that it is not a bourn and it does spray Forester is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__