the swaggerer derails laugh.
sent1: if the cabinetmaker derails swaggerer but it does not perplex crook then the swaggerer does not derail laugh. sent2: if the neonate is not a reflation it is not a dancer. sent3: the fact that the trojan is a kind of Faustian thing that does not excise Shaktism does not hold. sent4: the trojan does not stigmatize Pyrrhula or it is not a dancer or both if the fact that it does not perplex crook hold. sent5: that the bacteroid is not a kind of a bench and does derail laugh is not right. sent6: if the fact that the bacteroid is not a bench and does derail laugh is not right the fact that the trojan derail laugh is correct. sent7: the cabinetmaker is Faustian if the fact that the trojan perplexes crook hold. sent8: that the neonate does stigmatize Pyrrhula and is a dancer is incorrect. sent9: the neonate is not a dancer. sent10: that the trojan is not Faustian and excises Shaktism is not correct. sent11: the cabinetmaker is not a kind of a Italian. sent12: the fact that that the trojan is not Faustian but it does excise Shaktism is right is not right if there is something such that it does not derail swaggerer. sent13: the fact that the fact that the neonate stigmatizes Pyrrhula but it is not a dancer is wrong is not false if the bacteroid stigmatizes Pyrrhula. sent14: the fact that the cabinetmaker does perplex crook is not incorrect if the interviewee is not a kind of a Italian. sent15: if something is not a reflation it is not a kind of a dancer. sent16: if the trojan is a kind of a bench then that the fact that the bacteroid does not stigmatize Pyrrhula is not incorrect is false. sent17: something does stigmatize Pyrrhula but it is not Italian if it does not derail swaggerer. sent18: the fact that the fact that the trojan is a kind of Faustian thing that does not excise Shaktism hold is incorrect if there exists something such that it does not derail swaggerer. sent19: the cabinetmaker does not perplex crook if that the interviewee is not a Italian is not incorrect. sent20: the trojan is not a kind of a bench and/or is not a reflation. sent21: if the fact that the trojan is not Faustian and does not excise Shaktism is false then it benches. sent22: there is something such that it derails swaggerer. sent23: the interviewee is not a Italian and/or is not a kind of an emperor. sent24: if the interviewee is not an emperor the cabinetmaker does not perplex crook. sent25: something that is not a kind of a reflation does stigmatize Pyrrhula and is not a kind of a dancer. sent26: if there exists something such that it does not derail swaggerer then the fact that the trojan is not Faustian and it does not excise Shaktism is not correct. sent27: if the neonate is a kind of an emperor that is not a reflation the interviewee does not stigmatize Pyrrhula. sent28: the neonate is not a reflation. sent29: if the bacteroid stigmatizes Pyrrhula that the neonate does stigmatizes Pyrrhula and is a dancer is false. sent30: the swaggerer derails laugh if the trojan derails laugh and does not derail swaggerer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cabinetmaker does not derail swaggerer.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it does not derail swaggerer.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the fact that the trojan is not Faustian and it does not excise Shaktism does not hold.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the fact that the trojan benches is not incorrect.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the bacteroid does stigmatize Pyrrhula.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the neonate stigmatizes Pyrrhula but it is not a dancer is not correct.; sent25 -> int6: the neonate stigmatizes Pyrrhula and is not a dancer if it is not a kind of a reflation.; int6 & sent28 -> int7: the fact that the neonate stigmatizes Pyrrhula but it is not a dancer is not wrong.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the cabinetmaker derails swaggerer.; sent23 & sent19 & sent24 -> int10: the cabinetmaker does not perplex crook.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the cabinetmaker does derail swaggerer but it does not perplex crook.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the swaggerer derails laugh.
sent6 & sent5 -> int12: the trojan does derail laugh.;
$hypothesis$ = the swaggerer derails laugh. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cabinetmaker derails swaggerer but it does not perplex crook then the swaggerer does not derail laugh. sent2: if the neonate is not a reflation it is not a dancer. sent3: the fact that the trojan is a kind of Faustian thing that does not excise Shaktism does not hold. sent4: the trojan does not stigmatize Pyrrhula or it is not a dancer or both if the fact that it does not perplex crook hold. sent5: that the bacteroid is not a kind of a bench and does derail laugh is not right. sent6: if the fact that the bacteroid is not a bench and does derail laugh is not right the fact that the trojan derail laugh is correct. sent7: the cabinetmaker is Faustian if the fact that the trojan perplexes crook hold. sent8: that the neonate does stigmatize Pyrrhula and is a dancer is incorrect. sent9: the neonate is not a dancer. sent10: that the trojan is not Faustian and excises Shaktism is not correct. sent11: the cabinetmaker is not a kind of a Italian. sent12: the fact that that the trojan is not Faustian but it does excise Shaktism is right is not right if there is something such that it does not derail swaggerer. sent13: the fact that the fact that the neonate stigmatizes Pyrrhula but it is not a dancer is wrong is not false if the bacteroid stigmatizes Pyrrhula. sent14: the fact that the cabinetmaker does perplex crook is not incorrect if the interviewee is not a kind of a Italian. sent15: if something is not a reflation it is not a kind of a dancer. sent16: if the trojan is a kind of a bench then that the fact that the bacteroid does not stigmatize Pyrrhula is not incorrect is false. sent17: something does stigmatize Pyrrhula but it is not Italian if it does not derail swaggerer. sent18: the fact that the fact that the trojan is a kind of Faustian thing that does not excise Shaktism hold is incorrect if there exists something such that it does not derail swaggerer. sent19: the cabinetmaker does not perplex crook if that the interviewee is not a Italian is not incorrect. sent20: the trojan is not a kind of a bench and/or is not a reflation. sent21: if the fact that the trojan is not Faustian and does not excise Shaktism is false then it benches. sent22: there is something such that it derails swaggerer. sent23: the interviewee is not a Italian and/or is not a kind of an emperor. sent24: if the interviewee is not an emperor the cabinetmaker does not perplex crook. sent25: something that is not a kind of a reflation does stigmatize Pyrrhula and is not a kind of a dancer. sent26: if there exists something such that it does not derail swaggerer then the fact that the trojan is not Faustian and it does not excise Shaktism is not correct. sent27: if the neonate is a kind of an emperor that is not a reflation the interviewee does not stigmatize Pyrrhula. sent28: the neonate is not a reflation. sent29: if the bacteroid stigmatizes Pyrrhula that the neonate does stigmatizes Pyrrhula and is a dancer is false. sent30: the swaggerer derails laugh if the trojan derails laugh and does not derail swaggerer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cabinetmaker does not derail swaggerer.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it does not derail swaggerer.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the fact that the trojan is not Faustian and it does not excise Shaktism does not hold.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the fact that the trojan benches is not incorrect.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the bacteroid does stigmatize Pyrrhula.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the neonate stigmatizes Pyrrhula but it is not a dancer is not correct.; sent25 -> int6: the neonate stigmatizes Pyrrhula and is not a dancer if it is not a kind of a reflation.; int6 & sent28 -> int7: the fact that the neonate stigmatizes Pyrrhula but it is not a dancer is not wrong.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the cabinetmaker derails swaggerer.; sent23 & sent19 & sent24 -> int10: the cabinetmaker does not perplex crook.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the cabinetmaker does derail swaggerer but it does not perplex crook.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__