the decadent does manhandle umbrellawort.
sent1: the fact that the alderman is field-crop thing that does not discountenance self-fulfillment does not hold. sent2: that the drunkard is eugenics or it manhandles umbrellawort or both is not true if that the arteriogram is not an intrigue is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that that it is field-crop and does not discountenance self-fulfillment is incorrect. sent4: if the drunkard does discountenance claimant then it is not an intrigue. sent5: if that the drunkard does discountenance claimant and/or it is not arenicolous is not true the arteriogram is an insinuation. sent6: the drunkard does not discountenance claimant. sent7: if the drunkard is eugenics then it awes internationalist. sent8: there exists something such that that it is not field-crop and does discountenance self-fulfillment is not correct. sent9: if there is something such that that it discountenances claimant and is not eugenics is not true the aldehyde does not discountenances claimant. sent10: the fact that the alderman is not an insinuation and it is not field-crop does not hold. sent11: if the alderman is field-crop the arteriogram does not awe internationalist and is not an insinuation. sent12: the fact that the fact that the alderman is not field-crop and does not discountenance self-fulfillment is false is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that something does discountenance claimant but it is not eugenics is not true if it intrigues. sent14: the drunkard does not awe internationalist if something is field-crop. sent15: if that the drunkard is eugenics and/or it manhandles umbrellawort is wrong then that the decadent does not manhandles umbrellawort is correct. sent16: the drunkard does not awe internationalist if that there is something such that that it is non-field-crop thing that does not discountenance self-fulfillment is false hold. sent17: the decadent manhandles umbrellawort or is not field-crop or both. sent18: if the drunkard discountenances claimant or is not arenicolous or both that it is not a kind of an intrigue is right. sent19: if something does not awe internationalist and it is not a kind of an insinuation then it is not a kind of an intrigue. sent20: there exists something such that it is non-field-crop thing that does not discountenance self-fulfillment. sent21: the decadent manhandles umbrellawort if the arteriogram is an insinuation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drunkard does discountenance claimant and/or is non-arenicolous.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the drunkard does not intrigue.; sent12 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is non-field-crop thing that does not discountenance self-fulfillment does not hold.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the drunkard does not awe internationalist.;
that the aldehyde does not discountenance claimant is not false.
sent13 -> int4: if the drunkard does intrigue then that it does discountenance claimant and it is not eugenics is wrong.; sent17 -> int5: something either does manhandle umbrellawort or is not field-crop or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the decadent does manhandle umbrellawort. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the alderman is field-crop thing that does not discountenance self-fulfillment does not hold. sent2: that the drunkard is eugenics or it manhandles umbrellawort or both is not true if that the arteriogram is not an intrigue is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that that it is field-crop and does not discountenance self-fulfillment is incorrect. sent4: if the drunkard does discountenance claimant then it is not an intrigue. sent5: if that the drunkard does discountenance claimant and/or it is not arenicolous is not true the arteriogram is an insinuation. sent6: the drunkard does not discountenance claimant. sent7: if the drunkard is eugenics then it awes internationalist. sent8: there exists something such that that it is not field-crop and does discountenance self-fulfillment is not correct. sent9: if there is something such that that it discountenances claimant and is not eugenics is not true the aldehyde does not discountenances claimant. sent10: the fact that the alderman is not an insinuation and it is not field-crop does not hold. sent11: if the alderman is field-crop the arteriogram does not awe internationalist and is not an insinuation. sent12: the fact that the fact that the alderman is not field-crop and does not discountenance self-fulfillment is false is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that something does discountenance claimant but it is not eugenics is not true if it intrigues. sent14: the drunkard does not awe internationalist if something is field-crop. sent15: if that the drunkard is eugenics and/or it manhandles umbrellawort is wrong then that the decadent does not manhandles umbrellawort is correct. sent16: the drunkard does not awe internationalist if that there is something such that that it is non-field-crop thing that does not discountenance self-fulfillment is false hold. sent17: the decadent manhandles umbrellawort or is not field-crop or both. sent18: if the drunkard discountenances claimant or is not arenicolous or both that it is not a kind of an intrigue is right. sent19: if something does not awe internationalist and it is not a kind of an insinuation then it is not a kind of an intrigue. sent20: there exists something such that it is non-field-crop thing that does not discountenance self-fulfillment. sent21: the decadent manhandles umbrellawort if the arteriogram is an insinuation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drunkard does discountenance claimant and/or is non-arenicolous.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the drunkard does not intrigue.; sent12 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is non-field-crop thing that does not discountenance self-fulfillment does not hold.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the drunkard does not awe internationalist.; __UNKNOWN__