that there is something such that if it is not automatic it does amplify hypochondriac and it is a means is incorrect.
sent1: the ATM does amplify hypochondriac and it is a means if it is not an automatic. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not automatic then it is a means. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is not an automatic is right then it does amplify hypochondriac. sent4: something is a Palmer and debriefs Scranton if it does not amplify locule. sent5: if the ATM is an automatic then it amplifies hypochondriac and does mean. sent6: if the ATM is not an automatic it amplifies hypochondriac. sent7: there is something such that if it is an automatic then it amplifies hypochondriac and is a means. sent8: there is something such that if it does not underlie it is innocuous and a hemisphere.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it does not amplify locule hold then it is a Palmer and does debrief Scranton.
sent4 -> int1: if the flagfish does not amplify locule it is a Palmer that debriefs Scranton.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not automatic it does amplify hypochondriac and it is a means is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the ATM does amplify hypochondriac and it is a means if it is not an automatic. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not automatic then it is a means. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is not an automatic is right then it does amplify hypochondriac. sent4: something is a Palmer and debriefs Scranton if it does not amplify locule. sent5: if the ATM is an automatic then it amplifies hypochondriac and does mean. sent6: if the ATM is not an automatic it amplifies hypochondriac. sent7: there is something such that if it is an automatic then it amplifies hypochondriac and is a means. sent8: there is something such that if it does not underlie it is innocuous and a hemisphere. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__