the larvacide is logistic.
sent1: the protein does not syllogize Citlaltepetl. sent2: there is something such that that it does not syllogize Citlaltepetl hold. sent3: that the larvacide is seminal is correct if there exists something such that that it does syllogize Citlaltepetl and/or is a beetroot does not hold. sent4: the fact that the chyme is the kind of Pacific thing that is ontological if the chyme is not immunotherapeutic is not false. sent5: the chyme clutches. sent6: the larvacide is logistic if the fact that it is seminal is not wrong. sent7: the duff clutches and it is a Lutjanus. sent8: the chyme is unopposable if the fact that it is a magnitude and/or is not a clutch is incorrect. sent9: something does toilet-train Fragonard if it is unopposable. sent10: if the chyme toilet-trains Fragonard and is a kind of a Pacific then it is not revenant. sent11: the chyme is ontological. sent12: there exists something such that either it does syllogize Citlaltepetl or it is a kind of a beetroot or both. sent13: the chyme is unopposable if that either it is a kind of a magnitude or it does clutch or both is incorrect. sent14: that that either the chyme is a kind of a magnitude or it is not a clutch or both hold is not right. sent15: the larvacide is not logistic if the chyme toilet-trains Fragonard and is logistic. sent16: the chyme is not immunotherapeutic.
sent8 & sent14 -> int1: the chyme is unopposable.; sent9 -> int2: if the chyme is unopposable it toilet-trains Fragonard.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chyme toilet-trains Fragonard.; sent4 & sent16 -> int4: the chyme is a Pacific and it is ontological.; int4 -> int5: the chyme is not non-Pacific.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the chyme toilet-trains Fragonard and is a kind of a Pacific.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the chyme is not a revenant.;
the larvacide is not logistic.
$hypothesis$ = the larvacide is logistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the protein does not syllogize Citlaltepetl. sent2: there is something such that that it does not syllogize Citlaltepetl hold. sent3: that the larvacide is seminal is correct if there exists something such that that it does syllogize Citlaltepetl and/or is a beetroot does not hold. sent4: the fact that the chyme is the kind of Pacific thing that is ontological if the chyme is not immunotherapeutic is not false. sent5: the chyme clutches. sent6: the larvacide is logistic if the fact that it is seminal is not wrong. sent7: the duff clutches and it is a Lutjanus. sent8: the chyme is unopposable if the fact that it is a magnitude and/or is not a clutch is incorrect. sent9: something does toilet-train Fragonard if it is unopposable. sent10: if the chyme toilet-trains Fragonard and is a kind of a Pacific then it is not revenant. sent11: the chyme is ontological. sent12: there exists something such that either it does syllogize Citlaltepetl or it is a kind of a beetroot or both. sent13: the chyme is unopposable if that either it is a kind of a magnitude or it does clutch or both is incorrect. sent14: that that either the chyme is a kind of a magnitude or it is not a clutch or both hold is not right. sent15: the larvacide is not logistic if the chyme toilet-trains Fragonard and is logistic. sent16: the chyme is not immunotherapeutic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent14 -> int1: the chyme is unopposable.; sent9 -> int2: if the chyme is unopposable it toilet-trains Fragonard.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chyme toilet-trains Fragonard.; sent4 & sent16 -> int4: the chyme is a Pacific and it is ontological.; int4 -> int5: the chyme is not non-Pacific.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the chyme toilet-trains Fragonard and is a kind of a Pacific.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the chyme is not a revenant.; __UNKNOWN__