the fact that there is something such that if that it abuses Gruyere and/or it is anaerobic does not hold then it does not abuse muscat is incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that the bridgehead is a caw or buries Aulostomidae or both is incorrect then it does not exult. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a audibility and/or a nuncio does not hold then it is not pyrochemical. sent3: there is something such that if it does abuse Gruyere and/or it is anaerobic then it does not abuse muscat. sent4: the peba does not grate if the fact that it propagandizes and/or is Sisyphean is not true. sent5: the prick does not abuse muscat if the fact that it either abuses Gruyere or is anaerobic or both is false. sent6: the prick does not abuse muscat if it abuses Gruyere and/or it is anaerobic. sent7: the prick does not inscribe if that it is anaerobic or a prostate or both is not correct. sent8: the pro-lifer does not abuse muscat if that it is either an exhibit or impervious or both does not hold. sent9: if the fact that that the prick abuses muscat and/or does abuse hostilities is incorrect is right then it is not a superior. sent10: there is something such that if that it is naval or it is Sumerian or both is not true that it does not hop alundum is not false. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that either it does abuse colophony or it is maxillomandibular or both does not hold it is not cytotoxic. sent12: the prick is not an icebreaker if that it does abuse Gruyere and/or it does reckon is not right. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that either it abuses Gruyere or it is anaerobic or both is not right then it does abuse muscat. sent14: if the fact that the prick abuses Gruyere and/or it is anaerobic is false then it does abuse muscat. sent15: if that the Saudi is anaerobic or is an antithesis or both does not hold then it does not exult. sent16: there exists something such that if that it does ladle muscat and/or it scalps is not correct the fact that it is not a placental is correct. sent17: the fact that the prick does not hop umpire if that the prick is not non-anaerobic and/or it does abuse baddeleyite is not correct is not false. sent18: if that the muscat either does abuse Gruyere or is a medic or both does not hold then it does not bury housewifery. sent19: if the fact that either something does hop alundum or it buries obverse or both is incorrect then it is not unreproducible. sent20: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of an icebreaker and/or it buries Belize is wrong it is not a hitch. sent21: the prick does not abuse baddeleyite if that it is a kind of an icebreaker and/or it is anaerobic is false.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it hops alundum and/or it does bury obverse is not correct it is not unreproducible.
sent19 -> int1: if that the Labor hops alundum or it buries obverse or both does not hold then it is not unreproducible.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it abuses Gruyere and/or it is anaerobic does not hold then it does not abuse muscat is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the bridgehead is a caw or buries Aulostomidae or both is incorrect then it does not exult. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a audibility and/or a nuncio does not hold then it is not pyrochemical. sent3: there is something such that if it does abuse Gruyere and/or it is anaerobic then it does not abuse muscat. sent4: the peba does not grate if the fact that it propagandizes and/or is Sisyphean is not true. sent5: the prick does not abuse muscat if the fact that it either abuses Gruyere or is anaerobic or both is false. sent6: the prick does not abuse muscat if it abuses Gruyere and/or it is anaerobic. sent7: the prick does not inscribe if that it is anaerobic or a prostate or both is not correct. sent8: the pro-lifer does not abuse muscat if that it is either an exhibit or impervious or both does not hold. sent9: if the fact that that the prick abuses muscat and/or does abuse hostilities is incorrect is right then it is not a superior. sent10: there is something such that if that it is naval or it is Sumerian or both is not true that it does not hop alundum is not false. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that either it does abuse colophony or it is maxillomandibular or both does not hold it is not cytotoxic. sent12: the prick is not an icebreaker if that it does abuse Gruyere and/or it does reckon is not right. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that either it abuses Gruyere or it is anaerobic or both is not right then it does abuse muscat. sent14: if the fact that the prick abuses Gruyere and/or it is anaerobic is false then it does abuse muscat. sent15: if that the Saudi is anaerobic or is an antithesis or both does not hold then it does not exult. sent16: there exists something such that if that it does ladle muscat and/or it scalps is not correct the fact that it is not a placental is correct. sent17: the fact that the prick does not hop umpire if that the prick is not non-anaerobic and/or it does abuse baddeleyite is not correct is not false. sent18: if that the muscat either does abuse Gruyere or is a medic or both does not hold then it does not bury housewifery. sent19: if the fact that either something does hop alundum or it buries obverse or both is incorrect then it is not unreproducible. sent20: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of an icebreaker and/or it buries Belize is wrong it is not a hitch. sent21: the prick does not abuse baddeleyite if that it is a kind of an icebreaker and/or it is anaerobic is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__