the squint does not occur.
sent1: that either the consternating destruction occurs or the biocatalyticness happens or both prevents that the idiomaticness happens. sent2: if the consternating proportion does not occur that the outwearing and the greening occurs is correct. sent3: if that the superconductivity does not occur hold then the coordination does not occur. sent4: the fact that the consternating destruction does not occur hold if the biocatalyticness occurs. sent5: the drill does not occur. sent6: that the disentangling POW occurs yields that not the strengthening cotangent but the conjugation occurs. sent7: that both the biocatalyticness and the non-idiomaticness occurs prevents that the consternating destruction occurs. sent8: the superconductivity does not occur if the regularness does not occur. sent9: that the consternating proportion does not occur and/or the cericness does not occur prevents the consternating proportion. sent10: that the consternating destruction occurs is right if the instructionalness occurs. sent11: the agribusiness occurs. sent12: the disentangling POW occurs. sent13: that the instructionalness does not occur yields the squint. sent14: the Sunnah does not occur if the disentangling negativity occurs and the outwearing happens. sent15: the disentangling negativity but not the outwearing happens. sent16: if the outwearing does not occur the idiomaticness happens and the Sunnah happens. sent17: if the coordination does not occur both the disentangling negativity and the constraint happens. sent18: if the cutinizing does not occur then the consternating proportion does not occur and/or the cericness does not occur. sent19: the idiomaticness does not occur if the biocatalyticness happens. sent20: if the fact that the Sunnah does not occur is true the squint does not occur. sent21: the regularness does not occur if the strengthening cotangent does not occur but the conjugation occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the instructionalness occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the consternating destruction occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the consternating destruction occurs or the biocatalyticness happens or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the idiomaticness does not occur.; sent15 -> int4: the outwearing does not occur.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the idiomaticness and the Sunnah happens.; int5 -> int6: the idiomaticness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the instructionalness does not occur.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the squint does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the squint does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that either the consternating destruction occurs or the biocatalyticness happens or both prevents that the idiomaticness happens. sent2: if the consternating proportion does not occur that the outwearing and the greening occurs is correct. sent3: if that the superconductivity does not occur hold then the coordination does not occur. sent4: the fact that the consternating destruction does not occur hold if the biocatalyticness occurs. sent5: the drill does not occur. sent6: that the disentangling POW occurs yields that not the strengthening cotangent but the conjugation occurs. sent7: that both the biocatalyticness and the non-idiomaticness occurs prevents that the consternating destruction occurs. sent8: the superconductivity does not occur if the regularness does not occur. sent9: that the consternating proportion does not occur and/or the cericness does not occur prevents the consternating proportion. sent10: that the consternating destruction occurs is right if the instructionalness occurs. sent11: the agribusiness occurs. sent12: the disentangling POW occurs. sent13: that the instructionalness does not occur yields the squint. sent14: the Sunnah does not occur if the disentangling negativity occurs and the outwearing happens. sent15: the disentangling negativity but not the outwearing happens. sent16: if the outwearing does not occur the idiomaticness happens and the Sunnah happens. sent17: if the coordination does not occur both the disentangling negativity and the constraint happens. sent18: if the cutinizing does not occur then the consternating proportion does not occur and/or the cericness does not occur. sent19: the idiomaticness does not occur if the biocatalyticness happens. sent20: if the fact that the Sunnah does not occur is true the squint does not occur. sent21: the regularness does not occur if the strengthening cotangent does not occur but the conjugation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the instructionalness occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the consternating destruction occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the consternating destruction occurs or the biocatalyticness happens or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the idiomaticness does not occur.; sent15 -> int4: the outwearing does not occur.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the idiomaticness and the Sunnah happens.; int5 -> int6: the idiomaticness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the instructionalness does not occur.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__