the mohawk does not bar ambivalence.
sent1: the fact that the Taoist is a Rattigan and does not numerate ethernet is wrong. sent2: the commissure does not bar thistledown and it is not translational if it is unacquisitive. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not bar ambivalence is right. sent4: that the Taoist is not a Rattigan but it does numerate ethernet does not hold if the hyena is a kind of a Rattigan. sent5: if the commissure does not bar thistledown and is nontranslational the Taoist does not bar thistledown. sent6: if the fact that the Taoist is not a Rattigan and does not numerate ethernet is false the mohawk does not bar ambivalence. sent7: if something does not bar thistledown that it does not numerate ethernet and is a Rattigan is wrong. sent8: if the Taoist is not non-denominational the hyena numerates ethernet. sent9: the hyena is denominational and does bar hyena. sent10: if the barge does field madrasa then the commissure is unacquisitive. sent11: that the fact that the Taoist is not a Rattigan and does numerate ethernet is not wrong is not true. sent12: something is denominational if it does not bar hyena. sent13: the hyena bars ambivalence if the fact that it does bar hyena hold. sent14: that the Taoist is a kind of a Rattigan but it does not numerate ethernet is not right if the fact that the hyena is a kind of a Rattigan is correct. sent15: a denominational thing bars ambivalence. sent16: the hyena is denominational. sent17: the fact that the cement is not denominational and it is not a mastoidectomy is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that the hyena does not bar ambivalence and it is not denominational is not correct the mohawk does not numerate ethernet. sent19: if something bars hyena then the fact that it is a Rattigan is not wrong.
sent9 -> int1: the hyena bars hyena.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the hyena does bar hyena is not false then it is a Rattigan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hyena is a Rattigan.;
the hyena numerates ethernet.
$hypothesis$ = the mohawk does not bar ambivalence. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Taoist is a Rattigan and does not numerate ethernet is wrong. sent2: the commissure does not bar thistledown and it is not translational if it is unacquisitive. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not bar ambivalence is right. sent4: that the Taoist is not a Rattigan but it does numerate ethernet does not hold if the hyena is a kind of a Rattigan. sent5: if the commissure does not bar thistledown and is nontranslational the Taoist does not bar thistledown. sent6: if the fact that the Taoist is not a Rattigan and does not numerate ethernet is false the mohawk does not bar ambivalence. sent7: if something does not bar thistledown that it does not numerate ethernet and is a Rattigan is wrong. sent8: if the Taoist is not non-denominational the hyena numerates ethernet. sent9: the hyena is denominational and does bar hyena. sent10: if the barge does field madrasa then the commissure is unacquisitive. sent11: that the fact that the Taoist is not a Rattigan and does numerate ethernet is not wrong is not true. sent12: something is denominational if it does not bar hyena. sent13: the hyena bars ambivalence if the fact that it does bar hyena hold. sent14: that the Taoist is a kind of a Rattigan but it does not numerate ethernet is not right if the fact that the hyena is a kind of a Rattigan is correct. sent15: a denominational thing bars ambivalence. sent16: the hyena is denominational. sent17: the fact that the cement is not denominational and it is not a mastoidectomy is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that the hyena does not bar ambivalence and it is not denominational is not correct the mohawk does not numerate ethernet. sent19: if something bars hyena then the fact that it is a Rattigan is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the hyena bars hyena.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the hyena does bar hyena is not false then it is a Rattigan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hyena is a Rattigan.; __UNKNOWN__