if the backstopping leak happens then the match-up does not occur.
sent1: that the smallerness occurs or that the cacophony occurs or both triggers the backstopping leak. sent2: the displacing is prevented by that the cacophony does not occur. sent3: the scalableness does not occur. sent4: the palatalizing Cetoniidae occurs. sent5: that the backstopping piquancy happens is not right. sent6: the displacing does not occur. sent7: the displacing does not occur and the match-up does not occur if the cacophony does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backstopping leak occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cacophony occurs.; assump2 -> int1: either the smallerness or the cacophony or both happens.;
$hypothesis$ = if the backstopping leak happens then the match-up does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the smallerness occurs or that the cacophony occurs or both triggers the backstopping leak. sent2: the displacing is prevented by that the cacophony does not occur. sent3: the scalableness does not occur. sent4: the palatalizing Cetoniidae occurs. sent5: that the backstopping piquancy happens is not right. sent6: the displacing does not occur. sent7: the displacing does not occur and the match-up does not occur if the cacophony does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backstopping leak occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cacophony occurs.; assump2 -> int1: either the smallerness or the cacophony or both happens.; __UNKNOWN__