the Clorox is a kind of a Hazardia.
sent1: the demijohn is a hypernatremia if the fact that the insecticide does not repot idolater and it is not a kind of a hypernatremia is not true. sent2: if the fact that something is a smile but it is not a kind of a sandstone is wrong then it is a kind of a shorts. sent3: that the insecticide is not a curiosity and it is not tabular is not right. sent4: that the Clorox is a disharmony and is non-shorts is false. sent5: if something is a kind of a cristobalite then it is a Hazardia. sent6: that the Clorox is a kind of a smile and is a kind of a sandstone is not right. sent7: there exists nothing that is a smile and is a sandstone. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of Neanderthal thing that is not Shinto does not hold if the fact that it is a curiosity hold. sent9: that the insecticide does not repot idolater and is not a hypernatremia is false if it does incriminate. sent10: that the Clorox is a smile but it does not repot Stonehenge is wrong. sent11: if something is not non-shorts then it is a cristobalite. sent12: something that is a cristobalite is shorts. sent13: if the fact that the demijohn incriminates is not incorrect then the fact that it does not repot idolater and it does not repot benevolence is incorrect. sent14: if the Clorox is a sandstone it is a kind of a shorts. sent15: something is a shorts if it is a sandstone. sent16: if that something does not repot idolater and it does not repot benevolence is incorrect it is not a hypernatremia. sent17: the Clorox is a kind of a cristobalite that is a shorts if the demijohn is not a hypernatremia. sent18: if the fact that something is Neanderthal but it is not a Shinto is not right then it incriminates. sent19: something that does not repot benevolence and/or is a hypernatremia is a Hazardia. sent20: a tenterhook is a Zhuang. sent21: there is nothing that is a Chionanthus and does not repot Clorox.
sent2 -> int1: the Clorox is a shorts if the fact that it is a smile and is not a sandstone is wrong.; sent11 -> int2: if the Clorox is a shorts it is a cristobalite.; sent5 -> int3: the Clorox is a kind of a Hazardia if it is a cristobalite.;
the snips is shorts.
sent12 -> int4: if the snips is a cristobalite it is shorts.; sent19 -> int5: the demijohn is a Hazardia if it does not repot benevolence or is a kind of a hypernatremia or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the Clorox is a kind of a Hazardia. ; $context$ = sent1: the demijohn is a hypernatremia if the fact that the insecticide does not repot idolater and it is not a kind of a hypernatremia is not true. sent2: if the fact that something is a smile but it is not a kind of a sandstone is wrong then it is a kind of a shorts. sent3: that the insecticide is not a curiosity and it is not tabular is not right. sent4: that the Clorox is a disharmony and is non-shorts is false. sent5: if something is a kind of a cristobalite then it is a Hazardia. sent6: that the Clorox is a kind of a smile and is a kind of a sandstone is not right. sent7: there exists nothing that is a smile and is a sandstone. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of Neanderthal thing that is not Shinto does not hold if the fact that it is a curiosity hold. sent9: that the insecticide does not repot idolater and is not a hypernatremia is false if it does incriminate. sent10: that the Clorox is a smile but it does not repot Stonehenge is wrong. sent11: if something is not non-shorts then it is a cristobalite. sent12: something that is a cristobalite is shorts. sent13: if the fact that the demijohn incriminates is not incorrect then the fact that it does not repot idolater and it does not repot benevolence is incorrect. sent14: if the Clorox is a sandstone it is a kind of a shorts. sent15: something is a shorts if it is a sandstone. sent16: if that something does not repot idolater and it does not repot benevolence is incorrect it is not a hypernatremia. sent17: the Clorox is a kind of a cristobalite that is a shorts if the demijohn is not a hypernatremia. sent18: if the fact that something is Neanderthal but it is not a Shinto is not right then it incriminates. sent19: something that does not repot benevolence and/or is a hypernatremia is a Hazardia. sent20: a tenterhook is a Zhuang. sent21: there is nothing that is a Chionanthus and does not repot Clorox. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the Clorox is a shorts if the fact that it is a smile and is not a sandstone is wrong.; sent11 -> int2: if the Clorox is a shorts it is a cristobalite.; sent5 -> int3: the Clorox is a kind of a Hazardia if it is a cristobalite.; __UNKNOWN__