the bullfight is not a kind of an impossible.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is corymbose thing that does busk does not hold. sent2: the bullfight is possible if the sack is not a rhymed. sent3: the fact that the microbe does incriminate bullfight but it is not a Olympian is not true if it is vicarial. sent4: if something is not irrevocable then it is not a kind of an impossible. sent5: if that there exists something such that it does not compare is not incorrect then the lover is not irrevocable. sent6: the chimaera does not rhyme. sent7: if something does not rhyme it is an impossible and it does incriminate reenactment. sent8: the sack is not a kind of a Ganesh if it is not a kind of an impossible and it does incriminate reenactment. sent9: if a non-collective thing is a Ganesh it is not a rhymed. sent10: the microbe is vicarial. sent11: the lover does not incriminate reenactment. sent12: the lover is not impossible. sent13: if there is something such that it is corymbose that the lover is not irrevocable and does not compare is false. sent14: if the lover does not incriminate reenactment then the sack is not a collective and is a kind of a Ganesh. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-corymbose thing that does not busk does not hold that the sack is non-corymbose is right. sent16: the sack does not compare if there is something such that the fact that it is corymbose and does busk is false. sent17: if the fact that the microbe does incriminate bullfight and is not Olympian does not hold then it is not inexpedient. sent18: the lover is a rhymed if the sack does not incriminate reenactment. sent19: if something that does not incriminate reenactment is a rhymed then it is not a Ganesh. sent20: The reenactment does not incriminate lover. sent21: the fact that the toy is a kind of non-corymbose thing that does not busk is not true if the microbe is not inexpedient.
sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the sack is not a collective but it is a kind of a Ganesh.; sent9 -> int2: the sack is not a rhymed if it is not a collective and it is a Ganesh.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sack does not rhyme.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the bullfight is not a kind of a Ganesh hold.
sent4 -> int4: the lover is not an impossible if it is not irrevocable.; sent1 & sent16 -> int5: the sack does not compare.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does not compare.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the lover is not irrevocable.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the lover is not impossible hold.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not an impossible.;
$hypothesis$ = the bullfight is not a kind of an impossible. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is corymbose thing that does busk does not hold. sent2: the bullfight is possible if the sack is not a rhymed. sent3: the fact that the microbe does incriminate bullfight but it is not a Olympian is not true if it is vicarial. sent4: if something is not irrevocable then it is not a kind of an impossible. sent5: if that there exists something such that it does not compare is not incorrect then the lover is not irrevocable. sent6: the chimaera does not rhyme. sent7: if something does not rhyme it is an impossible and it does incriminate reenactment. sent8: the sack is not a kind of a Ganesh if it is not a kind of an impossible and it does incriminate reenactment. sent9: if a non-collective thing is a Ganesh it is not a rhymed. sent10: the microbe is vicarial. sent11: the lover does not incriminate reenactment. sent12: the lover is not impossible. sent13: if there is something such that it is corymbose that the lover is not irrevocable and does not compare is false. sent14: if the lover does not incriminate reenactment then the sack is not a collective and is a kind of a Ganesh. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-corymbose thing that does not busk does not hold that the sack is non-corymbose is right. sent16: the sack does not compare if there is something such that the fact that it is corymbose and does busk is false. sent17: if the fact that the microbe does incriminate bullfight and is not Olympian does not hold then it is not inexpedient. sent18: the lover is a rhymed if the sack does not incriminate reenactment. sent19: if something that does not incriminate reenactment is a rhymed then it is not a Ganesh. sent20: The reenactment does not incriminate lover. sent21: the fact that the toy is a kind of non-corymbose thing that does not busk is not true if the microbe is not inexpedient. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the sack is not a collective but it is a kind of a Ganesh.; sent9 -> int2: the sack is not a rhymed if it is not a collective and it is a Ganesh.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sack does not rhyme.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__