both the meaningfulness and the excreting pinnacle happens.
sent1: if that the ball-buster does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the straightening happens and the sampling ethicism happens is not correct. sent2: if the vigilantism happens the fact that the repressing greasewood happens and the redeeming happens is wrong. sent3: the meaninglessness does not occur. sent4: the repressing legged and the reliving occurs if the misfortune does not occur. sent5: that that the anophelineness occurs and the repressing greasewood does not occur is not correct is right if the redeeming occurs. sent6: the fact that that the repressing greasewood does not occur but the redeeming occurs is false if that the vigilantism occurs hold is not incorrect. sent7: the formalization happens if the fact that the meaninglessness does not occur and the excreting pinnacle happens is not correct. sent8: the formalization occurs if the meaninglessness occurs. sent9: the fact that both the meaninglessness and the excreting pinnacle happens is not right. sent10: if the fact that the repressing greasewood does not occur but the redeeming occurs is not true then the anopheline happens. sent11: if that both the misfortune and the reliving occurs is wrong then the repressing legged does not occur. sent12: the fact that both the polemoniaceousness and the redistribution occurs is wrong. sent13: if the reliving does not occur then the repressing legged does not occur. sent14: that the ball-buster occurs is triggered by the formalization. sent15: the fact that the repressing greasewood and the redeeming occurs does not hold. sent16: if the repressing greasewood happens then the anopheline happens. sent17: that both the misfortune and the reliving occurs is not correct. sent18: the vigilantism happens. sent19: if the fact that the anophelineness happens and the repressing greasewood does not occur is not correct then that the anophelineness does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both the meaningfulness and the excreting pinnacle happens is incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the formalization occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the ball-buster occurs.; sent11 & sent17 -> int3: the repressing legged does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: not the repressing legged but the ball-buster happens.; sent6 & sent18 -> int5: the fact that the repressing greasewood does not occur and the redeeming happens is not true.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the anopheline happens.;
the fact that not the meaninglessness but the excreting pinnacle happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = both the meaningfulness and the excreting pinnacle happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the ball-buster does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the straightening happens and the sampling ethicism happens is not correct. sent2: if the vigilantism happens the fact that the repressing greasewood happens and the redeeming happens is wrong. sent3: the meaninglessness does not occur. sent4: the repressing legged and the reliving occurs if the misfortune does not occur. sent5: that that the anophelineness occurs and the repressing greasewood does not occur is not correct is right if the redeeming occurs. sent6: the fact that that the repressing greasewood does not occur but the redeeming occurs is false if that the vigilantism occurs hold is not incorrect. sent7: the formalization happens if the fact that the meaninglessness does not occur and the excreting pinnacle happens is not correct. sent8: the formalization occurs if the meaninglessness occurs. sent9: the fact that both the meaninglessness and the excreting pinnacle happens is not right. sent10: if the fact that the repressing greasewood does not occur but the redeeming occurs is not true then the anopheline happens. sent11: if that both the misfortune and the reliving occurs is wrong then the repressing legged does not occur. sent12: the fact that both the polemoniaceousness and the redistribution occurs is wrong. sent13: if the reliving does not occur then the repressing legged does not occur. sent14: that the ball-buster occurs is triggered by the formalization. sent15: the fact that the repressing greasewood and the redeeming occurs does not hold. sent16: if the repressing greasewood happens then the anopheline happens. sent17: that both the misfortune and the reliving occurs is not correct. sent18: the vigilantism happens. sent19: if the fact that the anophelineness happens and the repressing greasewood does not occur is not correct then that the anophelineness does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both the meaningfulness and the excreting pinnacle happens is incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the formalization occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the ball-buster occurs.; sent11 & sent17 -> int3: the repressing legged does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: not the repressing legged but the ball-buster happens.; sent6 & sent18 -> int5: the fact that the repressing greasewood does not occur and the redeeming happens is not true.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the anopheline happens.; __UNKNOWN__