that there exists something such that if it is non-limbic then the fact that it barbs Tenthredinidae and it is unthematic is not true is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a Pagophilus then the fact that it is a Aphriza that is not a kind of a depolarization is wrong. sent2: the fact that if the marker is not limbic then the fact that the marker does arouse astronavigation but it is not permanent is not right is not false. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a amphotericin then that it is repulsive and it is not a muzzle is right. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not limbic then that it does barb Tenthredinidae and it is thematic does not hold. sent5: that something is forgettable and is not a driving does not hold if it is not a kind of a calamity. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a Callas then it endorses and is not a kind of a deadline. sent7: the fact that the coverlet does barb Tenthredinidae and is not thematic is not correct if that it is not limbic is incorrect. sent8: that the coverlet is a nucleoprotein but it is not a novillero does not hold if it does not barb Tenthredinidae. sent9: that the coverlet is a string but it is not categoric is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Beninese. sent10: that something barbs Tenthredinidae and is not a ungulate is incorrect if it is not uncooperative. sent11: the fact that the coverlet does barb Tenthredinidae and is thematic is wrong if it is not limbic. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a Callas then the fact that it is a tradeoff and it is not an electric does not hold is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is limbic that it barbs Tenthredinidae and is not thematic does not hold. sent14: the fact that the coverlet barbs Tenthredinidae but it is unthematic is not correct if it is not limbic. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not arouse coverlet the fact that it is stellar and it is not a permanent does not hold. sent16: if the coverlet is not limbic then it does barb Tenthredinidae and it is not thematic. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a Essen then the fact that it is a trainman and is undesirous does not hold. sent18: the fact that the coverlet is nosohusial but it is not ugly does not hold if it is not a drudging. sent19: if the coverlet is not a Nantucket then the fact that it is thematic and it is not a kind of a flavone does not hold. sent20: there is something such that if it is not limbic then it does barb Tenthredinidae and it is not thematic.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a calamity is correct then the fact that it is forgettable and it does not drive is false.
sent5 -> int1: if the Easter is not a calamity the fact that it is forgettable and it is not a kind of a driving is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is non-limbic then the fact that it barbs Tenthredinidae and it is unthematic is not true is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a Pagophilus then the fact that it is a Aphriza that is not a kind of a depolarization is wrong. sent2: the fact that if the marker is not limbic then the fact that the marker does arouse astronavigation but it is not permanent is not right is not false. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a amphotericin then that it is repulsive and it is not a muzzle is right. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not limbic then that it does barb Tenthredinidae and it is thematic does not hold. sent5: that something is forgettable and is not a driving does not hold if it is not a kind of a calamity. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a Callas then it endorses and is not a kind of a deadline. sent7: the fact that the coverlet does barb Tenthredinidae and is not thematic is not correct if that it is not limbic is incorrect. sent8: that the coverlet is a nucleoprotein but it is not a novillero does not hold if it does not barb Tenthredinidae. sent9: that the coverlet is a string but it is not categoric is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Beninese. sent10: that something barbs Tenthredinidae and is not a ungulate is incorrect if it is not uncooperative. sent11: the fact that the coverlet does barb Tenthredinidae and is thematic is wrong if it is not limbic. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a Callas then the fact that it is a tradeoff and it is not an electric does not hold is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is limbic that it barbs Tenthredinidae and is not thematic does not hold. sent14: the fact that the coverlet barbs Tenthredinidae but it is unthematic is not correct if it is not limbic. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not arouse coverlet the fact that it is stellar and it is not a permanent does not hold. sent16: if the coverlet is not limbic then it does barb Tenthredinidae and it is not thematic. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a Essen then the fact that it is a trainman and is undesirous does not hold. sent18: the fact that the coverlet is nosohusial but it is not ugly does not hold if it is not a drudging. sent19: if the coverlet is not a Nantucket then the fact that it is thematic and it is not a kind of a flavone does not hold. sent20: there is something such that if it is not limbic then it does barb Tenthredinidae and it is not thematic. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__