the fact that there is something such that if either it birls or it is not a managership or both then it is actable does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a Tantrism or it does not flirt or both then it is relativistic. sent2: there exists something such that if it birls then it is actable. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if it melts and/or it is not appendicular then it is a Sonchus is not wrong. sent4: if either the newmarket is a Woodbury or it is not a kind of a residue or both then it is actable. sent5: the newmarket lords if it is a kind of a managership or it is not fenestral or both. sent6: that something that is a second or does not cling photocell or both is a kind of a burning is right. sent7: if the web is either an oxide or not a steerageway or both then it does birl. sent8: that the newmarket is actable is not wrong if it either does birl or is not a managership or both. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a managership it is actable. sent10: there exists something such that if either it birls or it is a managership or both then it is not unactable. sent11: there is something such that if it is a lambkill or not immunochemical or both it is relativistic. sent12: there is something such that if that either it is emulous or it is not adducent or both hold then it is radiological. sent13: the ballpark untunes perfectibility if either it is a kind of a SCLK or it is not actable or both. sent14: the newmarket is actable if the fact that it is not a managership is not wrong. sent15: there is something such that if it compromises or it is not a millpond or both then it is a methionine. sent16: that the newmarket is blastodermatic hold if it is actable or is not an issue or both.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it either does second or does not cling photocell or both it burns.
sent6 -> int1: if either the diskette is a second or it does not cling photocell or both then it is a burning.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if either it birls or it is not a managership or both then it is actable does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a Tantrism or it does not flirt or both then it is relativistic. sent2: there exists something such that if it birls then it is actable. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if it melts and/or it is not appendicular then it is a Sonchus is not wrong. sent4: if either the newmarket is a Woodbury or it is not a kind of a residue or both then it is actable. sent5: the newmarket lords if it is a kind of a managership or it is not fenestral or both. sent6: that something that is a second or does not cling photocell or both is a kind of a burning is right. sent7: if the web is either an oxide or not a steerageway or both then it does birl. sent8: that the newmarket is actable is not wrong if it either does birl or is not a managership or both. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a managership it is actable. sent10: there exists something such that if either it birls or it is a managership or both then it is not unactable. sent11: there is something such that if it is a lambkill or not immunochemical or both it is relativistic. sent12: there is something such that if that either it is emulous or it is not adducent or both hold then it is radiological. sent13: the ballpark untunes perfectibility if either it is a kind of a SCLK or it is not actable or both. sent14: the newmarket is actable if the fact that it is not a managership is not wrong. sent15: there is something such that if it compromises or it is not a millpond or both then it is a methionine. sent16: that the newmarket is blastodermatic hold if it is actable or is not an issue or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__