that the ascus is not a Olympian is correct.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not a Tay and it is not scriptural. sent2: something is not scriptural if it is a snowshoe and hypodermic. sent3: the Labor is not a Olympian if the ascus does not tarnish loin. sent4: that the Galloway is alluvial is right if there exists something such that it is alluvial. sent5: the ascus is scriptural. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it does not busk and does not tarnish loin is not correct. sent7: the Labor excludes pauperization. sent8: the ascus is not a housewrecker. sent9: the Labor does not tarnish loin if the fact that the Galloway is a kentan and it is alluvial is wrong. sent10: the ascus is not a Olympian if the Galloway is not a kind of a hypodermic. sent11: the ascus is not a snowshoe. sent12: that the Galloway is a kentan and it is alluvial is not true if it is not scriptural. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not busk and does not tarnish loin is not true that the Labor tarnish loin is true. sent14: the Turk assists if it is not a Tay and it does not exclude pauperization. sent15: something does not tarnish scrapbook and it is not a lignosae. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a Catalan and it does not exclude freelancer is not correct. sent17: the Galloway is a kind of a snowshoe if the Turk is an assisted. sent18: the Labor is alluvial. sent19: if the Turk is a kind of a snowshoe the fact that the fact that the ascus is not a kind of a Olympian is not false is wrong. sent20: the Turk is a kind of a transformation and is a kind of a sextant.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Galloway is hypodermic hold.; sent2 -> int1: the Galloway is not scriptural if it is both a snowshoe and a hypodermic.; sent6 & sent13 -> int2: the Labor tarnishes loin.;
the ascus is Olympian.
$hypothesis$ = that the ascus is not a Olympian is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a Tay and it is not scriptural. sent2: something is not scriptural if it is a snowshoe and hypodermic. sent3: the Labor is not a Olympian if the ascus does not tarnish loin. sent4: that the Galloway is alluvial is right if there exists something such that it is alluvial. sent5: the ascus is scriptural. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it does not busk and does not tarnish loin is not correct. sent7: the Labor excludes pauperization. sent8: the ascus is not a housewrecker. sent9: the Labor does not tarnish loin if the fact that the Galloway is a kentan and it is alluvial is wrong. sent10: the ascus is not a Olympian if the Galloway is not a kind of a hypodermic. sent11: the ascus is not a snowshoe. sent12: that the Galloway is a kentan and it is alluvial is not true if it is not scriptural. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not busk and does not tarnish loin is not true that the Labor tarnish loin is true. sent14: the Turk assists if it is not a Tay and it does not exclude pauperization. sent15: something does not tarnish scrapbook and it is not a lignosae. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a Catalan and it does not exclude freelancer is not correct. sent17: the Galloway is a kind of a snowshoe if the Turk is an assisted. sent18: the Labor is alluvial. sent19: if the Turk is a kind of a snowshoe the fact that the fact that the ascus is not a kind of a Olympian is not false is wrong. sent20: the Turk is a kind of a transformation and is a kind of a sextant. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Galloway is hypodermic hold.; sent2 -> int1: the Galloway is not scriptural if it is both a snowshoe and a hypodermic.; sent6 & sent13 -> int2: the Labor tarnishes loin.; __UNKNOWN__