the hematopoieticness does not occur.
sent1: that the underpayment does not occur brings about that the pedagogicalness does not occur and the collision does not occur. sent2: the aquatinting happens and the sexiness occurs if the fact that the untidiness does not occur is not wrong. sent3: if the underpayment does not occur the hematopoieticness happens. sent4: that the roundup does not occur and the electrolyticness occurs is not true if the Tudorness does not occur. sent5: if the inviting does not occur the fact that the gregariousness does not occur and the underpayment happens is false. sent6: if that not the collision but the underpayment occurs is not right the hematopoieticness happens. sent7: if the citrousness does not occur that the inviting and the winnowing occurs is wrong. sent8: the fact that the gregariousness happens hold if the winnow occurs. sent9: that the collision occurs is not false. sent10: if the fact that the changelessness does not occur is correct then the untidiness and the aquatint occurs. sent11: that both the non-changelessness and the non-electrolyticness happens results in the non-untidiness. sent12: that the aquatint happens brings about that both the sexiness and the non-citrousness occurs. sent13: that the underpayment does not occur hold if the fact that both the ungregariousness and the underpayment happens is incorrect. sent14: the collision occurs but the hematopoieticness does not occur if the underpayment does not occur. sent15: the underpayment occurs. sent16: if that the Tudorness and the bronchospasm occurs is incorrect the Tudorness does not occur. sent17: that if the invite does not occur and the hematopoieticness does not occur the underpayment does not occur is correct. sent18: the invite does not occur and the hematopoieticness does not occur if the gregariousness happens. sent19: the watercolor happens. sent20: if the sexiness happens then the citrousness happens. sent21: the winnowing occurs if the citrousness happens. sent22: if that the roundup does not occur but the electrolytic happens is wrong the changelessness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the collision does not occur and the underpayment occurs.; assump1 -> int1: that the collision does not occur hold.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the collision does not occur and the underpayment happens does not hold.; sent6 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the hematopoieticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the hematopoieticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the underpayment does not occur brings about that the pedagogicalness does not occur and the collision does not occur. sent2: the aquatinting happens and the sexiness occurs if the fact that the untidiness does not occur is not wrong. sent3: if the underpayment does not occur the hematopoieticness happens. sent4: that the roundup does not occur and the electrolyticness occurs is not true if the Tudorness does not occur. sent5: if the inviting does not occur the fact that the gregariousness does not occur and the underpayment happens is false. sent6: if that not the collision but the underpayment occurs is not right the hematopoieticness happens. sent7: if the citrousness does not occur that the inviting and the winnowing occurs is wrong. sent8: the fact that the gregariousness happens hold if the winnow occurs. sent9: that the collision occurs is not false. sent10: if the fact that the changelessness does not occur is correct then the untidiness and the aquatint occurs. sent11: that both the non-changelessness and the non-electrolyticness happens results in the non-untidiness. sent12: that the aquatint happens brings about that both the sexiness and the non-citrousness occurs. sent13: that the underpayment does not occur hold if the fact that both the ungregariousness and the underpayment happens is incorrect. sent14: the collision occurs but the hematopoieticness does not occur if the underpayment does not occur. sent15: the underpayment occurs. sent16: if that the Tudorness and the bronchospasm occurs is incorrect the Tudorness does not occur. sent17: that if the invite does not occur and the hematopoieticness does not occur the underpayment does not occur is correct. sent18: the invite does not occur and the hematopoieticness does not occur if the gregariousness happens. sent19: the watercolor happens. sent20: if the sexiness happens then the citrousness happens. sent21: the winnowing occurs if the citrousness happens. sent22: if that the roundup does not occur but the electrolytic happens is wrong the changelessness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the collision does not occur and the underpayment occurs.; assump1 -> int1: that the collision does not occur hold.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the collision does not occur and the underpayment happens does not hold.; sent6 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__