the venesection occurs.
sent1: if the scenting commuter does not occur then the deep happens. sent2: the upstart and the cacodylicness occurs. sent3: if the film happens and the sedition happens then that the differential does not occur is right. sent4: the compelling carrack happens. sent5: if the ruff and the arson happens then the raging does not occur. sent6: the affairs occurs. sent7: the Flemishness does not occur. sent8: the ruff happens if the fact that the scenting commuter happens is not incorrect. sent9: that the scenting statesmanship does not occur is prevented by the airworthiness. sent10: both the blastoporalness and the nonrepetitiveness happens. sent11: that the venesection does not occur is brought about by that both the deepness and the affairs happens. sent12: the arson happens and the compelling carrack occurs. sent13: the harboring does not occur. sent14: the blastoporalness and the desertion happens. sent15: the fact that the sunlight occurs is not incorrect. sent16: the upstart happens. sent17: the fact that the affairs does not occur and the cacodylicness does not occur does not hold if the fact that the compelling carrack does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the fact that the cacodylicness happens hold the raging occurs. sent19: that the Bantoidness happens is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scenting commuter happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the ruff happens.; sent12 -> int2: the arson occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ruff and the arson happens.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the rage does not occur.; sent2 -> int5: the cacodylicness happens.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the raging occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the scenting commuter does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the deepness occurs.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the deep happens and the affairs happens.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the venesection happens.
$hypothesis$ = the venesection occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the scenting commuter does not occur then the deep happens. sent2: the upstart and the cacodylicness occurs. sent3: if the film happens and the sedition happens then that the differential does not occur is right. sent4: the compelling carrack happens. sent5: if the ruff and the arson happens then the raging does not occur. sent6: the affairs occurs. sent7: the Flemishness does not occur. sent8: the ruff happens if the fact that the scenting commuter happens is not incorrect. sent9: that the scenting statesmanship does not occur is prevented by the airworthiness. sent10: both the blastoporalness and the nonrepetitiveness happens. sent11: that the venesection does not occur is brought about by that both the deepness and the affairs happens. sent12: the arson happens and the compelling carrack occurs. sent13: the harboring does not occur. sent14: the blastoporalness and the desertion happens. sent15: the fact that the sunlight occurs is not incorrect. sent16: the upstart happens. sent17: the fact that the affairs does not occur and the cacodylicness does not occur does not hold if the fact that the compelling carrack does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the fact that the cacodylicness happens hold the raging occurs. sent19: that the Bantoidness happens is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scenting commuter happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the ruff happens.; sent12 -> int2: the arson occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ruff and the arson happens.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the rage does not occur.; sent2 -> int5: the cacodylicness happens.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the raging occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the scenting commuter does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the deepness occurs.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the deep happens and the affairs happens.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__