the bread is a Tibetan.
sent1: the bread burgeons if the utility is a Sturnella. sent2: if that something does not forward but it gloms collagenase is not correct it is a fuse. sent3: if something is hepatic then it does not glom collagenase and it does not forward. sent4: that the co-discoverer is a transistor is true. sent5: if the Chadian is not a tartar but a stopcock then it is not a fuse. sent6: if the transposon is hepatic then the fact that the Chadian is not a forward but it gloms collagenase is not right. sent7: if something that is a kind of a tartar is not a kind of a stopcock then it is not a fuse. sent8: the fact that something is a Sturnella and it does burgeon is not wrong if it does not glom collagenase. sent9: the Chadian is a kind of a fuse if it is a forward. sent10: if the utility is not a kind of a Sturnella then the Chadian is not a tartar and it is not a stopcock. sent11: the co-discoverer does defoliate triplet. sent12: something is a Tibetan if it does burgeon. sent13: if the Chadian is a vanilla then it is hepatic. sent14: the fact that the Chadian is not a shag and does not defoliate Abilene is false if the transposon is auroral. sent15: the Chadian is not a fuse if it is a kind of a tartar and it is not a stopcock. sent16: the fact that the neutralization is both a fuse and not a Sturnella does not hold if the utility does not burgeon. sent17: the fact that the Chadian forwards and it gloms collagenase is incorrect. sent18: the Chadian is a vanilla if the fact that it is not a shag and does not defoliate Abilene does not hold. sent19: the transposon is hepatic. sent20: there is something such that it is non-vanilla and hepatic. sent21: something is a kind of a fuse if it does forward. sent22: the utility does not burgeon if that there is something such that it is forward and is not non-Tibetan hold. sent23: if something that is not a tartar is a stopcock then that it is not a fuse is not wrong. sent24: if something is not a tartar and not a stopcock then it is not a kind of a fuse. sent25: if that the utility is a Tibetan and is not a fuse is wrong then the bread is not a Tibetan. sent26: if the transposon is hepatic then that the Chadian is a forward and it gloms collagenase is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the utility is not a Sturnella.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Chadian is not a tartar and is not a kind of a stopcock.; sent24 -> int2: if the Chadian is not a kind of a tartar and it is not a stopcock it is not a kind of a fuse.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Chadian is not a kind of a fuse.; sent2 -> int4: the Chadian fuses if the fact that it is non-forward thing that gloms collagenase is not right.; sent6 & sent19 -> int5: the fact that the Chadian is not forward but it gloms collagenase is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Chadian is a fuse.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the utility is a kind of a Sturnella.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the bread does burgeon.; sent12 -> int10: if the fact that the bread burgeons hold then it is Tibetan.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the neutralization gloms collagenase.
$hypothesis$ = the bread is a Tibetan. ; $context$ = sent1: the bread burgeons if the utility is a Sturnella. sent2: if that something does not forward but it gloms collagenase is not correct it is a fuse. sent3: if something is hepatic then it does not glom collagenase and it does not forward. sent4: that the co-discoverer is a transistor is true. sent5: if the Chadian is not a tartar but a stopcock then it is not a fuse. sent6: if the transposon is hepatic then the fact that the Chadian is not a forward but it gloms collagenase is not right. sent7: if something that is a kind of a tartar is not a kind of a stopcock then it is not a fuse. sent8: the fact that something is a Sturnella and it does burgeon is not wrong if it does not glom collagenase. sent9: the Chadian is a kind of a fuse if it is a forward. sent10: if the utility is not a kind of a Sturnella then the Chadian is not a tartar and it is not a stopcock. sent11: the co-discoverer does defoliate triplet. sent12: something is a Tibetan if it does burgeon. sent13: if the Chadian is a vanilla then it is hepatic. sent14: the fact that the Chadian is not a shag and does not defoliate Abilene is false if the transposon is auroral. sent15: the Chadian is not a fuse if it is a kind of a tartar and it is not a stopcock. sent16: the fact that the neutralization is both a fuse and not a Sturnella does not hold if the utility does not burgeon. sent17: the fact that the Chadian forwards and it gloms collagenase is incorrect. sent18: the Chadian is a vanilla if the fact that it is not a shag and does not defoliate Abilene does not hold. sent19: the transposon is hepatic. sent20: there is something such that it is non-vanilla and hepatic. sent21: something is a kind of a fuse if it does forward. sent22: the utility does not burgeon if that there is something such that it is forward and is not non-Tibetan hold. sent23: if something that is not a tartar is a stopcock then that it is not a fuse is not wrong. sent24: if something is not a tartar and not a stopcock then it is not a kind of a fuse. sent25: if that the utility is a Tibetan and is not a fuse is wrong then the bread is not a Tibetan. sent26: if the transposon is hepatic then that the Chadian is a forward and it gloms collagenase is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the utility is not a Sturnella.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Chadian is not a tartar and is not a kind of a stopcock.; sent24 -> int2: if the Chadian is not a kind of a tartar and it is not a stopcock it is not a kind of a fuse.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Chadian is not a kind of a fuse.; sent2 -> int4: the Chadian fuses if the fact that it is non-forward thing that gloms collagenase is not right.; sent6 & sent19 -> int5: the fact that the Chadian is not forward but it gloms collagenase is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Chadian is a fuse.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the utility is a kind of a Sturnella.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the bread does burgeon.; sent12 -> int10: if the fact that the bread burgeons hold then it is Tibetan.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__