the LDL is not a gayal.
sent1: if the escalator does acquaint and is not skinless then it is not cryonics. sent2: the escalator is not cryonics if it does acquaint and is not a rheumatologist. sent3: the escalator does acquaint. sent4: the dermatome is important and it devises if it is not an anomaly. sent5: if the tinsel is cryonics and does not deaminate snatcher the fact that the fact that the pilocarpine is cryonics is incorrect hold. sent6: the fact that the pilocarpine either is not skinless or is not a coating or both is not correct if the escalator is not cryonics. sent7: if that the pilocarpine does not acquaint is true then that the escalator either is not a gayal or is not skinless or both is not true. sent8: the LDL is cryonics. sent9: something is cryonics but it does not deaminate snatcher if it is not a coating. sent10: the pilocarpine is a coating if the escalator is not cryonics. sent11: if that the dermatome is not bony or it is mastoid or both is not true the tinsel does not coat. sent12: if something is important then the fact that it is not bony or it is a kind of a mastoid or both does not hold. sent13: if the pilocarpine is a gayal but it does not coat then it is not skinless. sent14: that the myxosporidian is not a rheumatologist or it is not pharyngeal or both is not true. sent15: the LDL is a gayal if that either the pilocarpine is not skinless or it is a coating or both is wrong. sent16: something is not an anomaly if the fact that it is not a schnitzel and it does not own pimple is not correct. sent17: the caustic is not a Declomycin. sent18: the LDL is a kind of a gayal if that the pilocarpine is not skinless and/or it is not a kind of a coating is incorrect. sent19: the pilocarpine is a kind of a coating. sent20: if the pilocarpine does acquaint and is not cryonics then it is not skinless. sent21: the LDL is not a rheumatologist. sent22: the escalator does acquaint and is not a rheumatologist. sent23: the LDL is not a gayal if that the escalator is a kind of a gayal and it is skinless is wrong. sent24: that the dermatome is not a schnitzel and it does not own pimple is not right if the caustic is not a kind of a Declomycin.
sent2 & sent22 -> int1: the escalator is not cryonics.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the pilocarpine is not skinless and/or it is not a coating is incorrect.; int2 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the LDL is not a gayal.
sent9 -> int3: if the tinsel does not coat then it is cryonics and does not deaminate snatcher.; sent12 -> int4: the fact that the dermatome is not bony or it is a mastoid or both is not right if the fact that it is important hold.; sent16 -> int5: the dermatome is not an anomaly if that it is not a schnitzel and it does not own pimple is incorrect.; sent24 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the dermatome is not a schnitzel and does not own pimple is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the dermatome is not an anomaly.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the dermatome is important and it does devise.; int8 -> int9: the dermatome is important.; int4 & int9 -> int10: that the dermatome is not bony and/or is mastoid is not right.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: the tinsel does not coat.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the tinsel is cryonics thing that does not deaminate snatcher.; sent5 & int12 -> int13: the pilocarpine is not cryonics.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not cryonics.;
$hypothesis$ = the LDL is not a gayal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the escalator does acquaint and is not skinless then it is not cryonics. sent2: the escalator is not cryonics if it does acquaint and is not a rheumatologist. sent3: the escalator does acquaint. sent4: the dermatome is important and it devises if it is not an anomaly. sent5: if the tinsel is cryonics and does not deaminate snatcher the fact that the fact that the pilocarpine is cryonics is incorrect hold. sent6: the fact that the pilocarpine either is not skinless or is not a coating or both is not correct if the escalator is not cryonics. sent7: if that the pilocarpine does not acquaint is true then that the escalator either is not a gayal or is not skinless or both is not true. sent8: the LDL is cryonics. sent9: something is cryonics but it does not deaminate snatcher if it is not a coating. sent10: the pilocarpine is a coating if the escalator is not cryonics. sent11: if that the dermatome is not bony or it is mastoid or both is not true the tinsel does not coat. sent12: if something is important then the fact that it is not bony or it is a kind of a mastoid or both does not hold. sent13: if the pilocarpine is a gayal but it does not coat then it is not skinless. sent14: that the myxosporidian is not a rheumatologist or it is not pharyngeal or both is not true. sent15: the LDL is a gayal if that either the pilocarpine is not skinless or it is a coating or both is wrong. sent16: something is not an anomaly if the fact that it is not a schnitzel and it does not own pimple is not correct. sent17: the caustic is not a Declomycin. sent18: the LDL is a kind of a gayal if that the pilocarpine is not skinless and/or it is not a kind of a coating is incorrect. sent19: the pilocarpine is a kind of a coating. sent20: if the pilocarpine does acquaint and is not cryonics then it is not skinless. sent21: the LDL is not a rheumatologist. sent22: the escalator does acquaint and is not a rheumatologist. sent23: the LDL is not a gayal if that the escalator is a kind of a gayal and it is skinless is wrong. sent24: that the dermatome is not a schnitzel and it does not own pimple is not right if the caustic is not a kind of a Declomycin. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent22 -> int1: the escalator is not cryonics.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the pilocarpine is not skinless and/or it is not a coating is incorrect.; int2 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__