if the Jew's-ear is a kind of a apophatism then it is not detachable.
sent1: the Jew's-ear is a Altair if it is not a tender and it is a gallfly. sent2: if something that is not a Thornton does not carbonate gallfly then it does not hear. sent3: the keyboardist does exterminate. sent4: the insider is not harmless if that it is not acropetal hold. sent5: the mayflower is acropetal if there is something such that it is acropetal and/or a snore. sent6: something is deductive and it is aeromedical if it is not a shuttle. sent7: if the keyboardist exterminates then the Uruguayan is not resolute. sent8: if something is not a gallfly then it is not detachable. sent9: if that the Jew's-ear does not warm teleologist and it is not nonfatal is not true then it is not acropetal. sent10: if there are acropetal things then the seedsman is a apophatism that is not a gallfly. sent11: the teleologist warms teleologist. sent12: if the Pernod is a gallfly the fact that the Jew's-ear does not carbonate salmonberry and is not detachable does not hold. sent13: if something is not acropetal and is a kind of a gallfly it is not a apophatism. sent14: something does not reverberate and is Platonistic if it does not hear. sent15: something is not a Thornton and does not carbonate gallfly if it is not resolute. sent16: something that does not reverberate and is Platonistic does not shuttle. sent17: that the Jew's-ear does not warm teleologist and it is not nonfatal is not true. sent18: something is not resolute if it does not carbonate Scolopax. sent19: the Jew's-ear is not acropetal if it is dysphemistic. sent20: the retrofit is nonfatal. sent21: if the seedsman is a apophatism but it is not a gallfly then the Pernod is a kind of a gallfly. sent22: the Jew's-ear is a apophatism if it is not acropetal and is a kind of a gallfly. sent23: if the fact that something is deductive is correct then it is a kind of a snore and does not carbonate Calder.
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the Jew's-ear is not acropetal.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Jew's-ear is a gallfly.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the Jew's-ear is not acropetal but it is a kind of a gallfly.; sent13 -> int3: the Jew's-ear is not a kind of a apophatism if it is non-acropetal thing that is a gallfly.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Jew's-ear is not a apophatism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jew's-ear is a apophatism.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the Jew's-ear is not a gallfly.; sent8 -> int7: if the fact that the Jew's-ear is not a gallfly is not false it is not detachable.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Jew's-ear is not detachable.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the Jew's-ear does not carbonate salmonberry and is not detachable does not hold.
sent23 -> int9: if the Uruguayan is deductive then it is a kind of a snore and it does not carbonate Calder.; sent6 -> int10: if the Uruguayan is not a shuttle then it is deductive but not non-aeromedical.; sent16 -> int11: if the Uruguayan does not reverberate but it is Platonistic it is not a shuttle.; sent14 -> int12: that the Uruguayan does not reverberate but it is Platonistic is not wrong if the fact that it does not hear is not wrong.; sent2 -> int13: the Uruguayan does not hear if it is not a Thornton and it does not carbonate gallfly.; sent15 -> int14: the Uruguayan is not a kind of a Thornton and it does not carbonate gallfly if it is not resolute.; sent7 & sent3 -> int15: the Uruguayan is not resolute.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the Uruguayan is not a kind of a Thornton and does not carbonate gallfly.; int13 & int16 -> int17: that the Uruguayan does not hear hold.; int12 & int17 -> int18: the Uruguayan does not reverberate and is Platonistic.; int11 & int18 -> int19: the Uruguayan does not shuttle.; int10 & int19 -> int20: the Uruguayan is a kind of deductive thing that is aeromedical.; int20 -> int21: the Uruguayan is deductive.; int9 & int21 -> int22: the Uruguayan is a kind of a snore but it does not carbonate Calder.; int22 -> int23: the Uruguayan is a kind of a snore.; int23 -> int24: the Uruguayan is acropetal and/or it snores.; int24 -> int25: there exists something such that it is acropetal and/or is a snore.; int25 & sent5 -> int26: the mayflower is acropetal.; int26 -> int27: there exists something such that it is acropetal.; int27 & sent10 -> int28: the seedsman is a kind of a apophatism and is not a gallfly.; sent21 & int28 -> int29: the Pernod is a gallfly.; sent12 & int29 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the Jew's-ear is a kind of a apophatism then it is not detachable. ; $context$ = sent1: the Jew's-ear is a Altair if it is not a tender and it is a gallfly. sent2: if something that is not a Thornton does not carbonate gallfly then it does not hear. sent3: the keyboardist does exterminate. sent4: the insider is not harmless if that it is not acropetal hold. sent5: the mayflower is acropetal if there is something such that it is acropetal and/or a snore. sent6: something is deductive and it is aeromedical if it is not a shuttle. sent7: if the keyboardist exterminates then the Uruguayan is not resolute. sent8: if something is not a gallfly then it is not detachable. sent9: if that the Jew's-ear does not warm teleologist and it is not nonfatal is not true then it is not acropetal. sent10: if there are acropetal things then the seedsman is a apophatism that is not a gallfly. sent11: the teleologist warms teleologist. sent12: if the Pernod is a gallfly the fact that the Jew's-ear does not carbonate salmonberry and is not detachable does not hold. sent13: if something is not acropetal and is a kind of a gallfly it is not a apophatism. sent14: something does not reverberate and is Platonistic if it does not hear. sent15: something is not a Thornton and does not carbonate gallfly if it is not resolute. sent16: something that does not reverberate and is Platonistic does not shuttle. sent17: that the Jew's-ear does not warm teleologist and it is not nonfatal is not true. sent18: something is not resolute if it does not carbonate Scolopax. sent19: the Jew's-ear is not acropetal if it is dysphemistic. sent20: the retrofit is nonfatal. sent21: if the seedsman is a apophatism but it is not a gallfly then the Pernod is a kind of a gallfly. sent22: the Jew's-ear is a apophatism if it is not acropetal and is a kind of a gallfly. sent23: if the fact that something is deductive is correct then it is a kind of a snore and does not carbonate Calder. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the Jew's-ear is not acropetal.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Jew's-ear is a gallfly.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the Jew's-ear is not acropetal but it is a kind of a gallfly.; sent13 -> int3: the Jew's-ear is not a kind of a apophatism if it is non-acropetal thing that is a gallfly.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Jew's-ear is not a apophatism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jew's-ear is a apophatism.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the Jew's-ear is not a gallfly.; sent8 -> int7: if the fact that the Jew's-ear is not a gallfly is not false it is not detachable.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Jew's-ear is not detachable.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__