the Babylonian does not sequence houseguest and is not a laptop.
sent1: the diabetic does reunify Spinoza if it sequences houseguest. sent2: there is nothing that is not a mount and not non-metropolitan. sent3: the fact that the Babylonian does sequence houseguest and is not a laptop is not right if that it does not reunify Spinoza hold. sent4: the Babylonian is not a mount but it is a metropolitan if it reunifies Spinoza. sent5: the fact that the shit is non-metropolitan is correct. sent6: that the neolith does not reunify Spinoza and is not a shellfish is not right. sent7: the fact that the Babylonian does not sequence houseguest but it is a laptop is not correct. sent8: if the Babylonian does not reunify Spinoza then the fact that it does not sequence houseguest and it is not a laptop is not true. sent9: there is nothing that is a mount and a metropolitan. sent10: there is nothing that does not reunify Spinoza and is metropolitan. sent11: the Babylonian is not a mount if it does reunify Spinoza. sent12: that the Babylonian is a mount that is a metropolitan does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Babylonian does reunify Spinoza.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Babylonian is not a mount but a metropolitan.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the Babylonian is not a mount but it is a metropolitan is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Babylonian does not reunify Spinoza.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the chaffinch is not a past and is a mount is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the Babylonian does not sequence houseguest and is not a laptop. ; $context$ = sent1: the diabetic does reunify Spinoza if it sequences houseguest. sent2: there is nothing that is not a mount and not non-metropolitan. sent3: the fact that the Babylonian does sequence houseguest and is not a laptop is not right if that it does not reunify Spinoza hold. sent4: the Babylonian is not a mount but it is a metropolitan if it reunifies Spinoza. sent5: the fact that the shit is non-metropolitan is correct. sent6: that the neolith does not reunify Spinoza and is not a shellfish is not right. sent7: the fact that the Babylonian does not sequence houseguest but it is a laptop is not correct. sent8: if the Babylonian does not reunify Spinoza then the fact that it does not sequence houseguest and it is not a laptop is not true. sent9: there is nothing that is a mount and a metropolitan. sent10: there is nothing that does not reunify Spinoza and is metropolitan. sent11: the Babylonian is not a mount if it does reunify Spinoza. sent12: that the Babylonian is a mount that is a metropolitan does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Babylonian does reunify Spinoza.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Babylonian is not a mount but a metropolitan.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the Babylonian is not a mount but it is a metropolitan is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Babylonian does not reunify Spinoza.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__