the tripling is a Brahmana.
sent1: if the puree is criminological or is a kind of a Aertex or both then the cancer is not a cine-film. sent2: if something either is carinal or does not splay mailing or both the tripling is not a Brahmana. sent3: if that something is not a cine-film and/or it communicates cancer does not hold then it is not a kind of a Aertex. sent4: the cancer is not cetacean and is non-deconstructionist. sent5: the crosse is not carinal if it is not a ephemerality. sent6: if the cancer is both not a cetacean and not deconstructionist then it does communicate cancer. sent7: the fact that the cancer is criminological and a Brahmana is not correct if the mediator is not a Aertex. sent8: if the puree is not a kind of a Brahmana the tripling is a kind of a Brahmana. sent9: if the fact that the puree either is carinal or does not splay mailing or both does not hold it is not non-criminological. sent10: if that the cancer is not a kind of a cine-film hold then it does not communicate cancer. sent11: the puree is not a Brahmana if that that the cancer is criminological a Brahmana is not wrong is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the puree is carinal and/or does not splay mailing is wrong.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the puree is criminological.; int1 -> int2: the puree is criminological or is a kind of a Aertex or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the cancer is not a cine-film.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the fact that the cancer does not communicate cancer is true.; sent6 & sent4 -> int5: the cancer does communicate cancer.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the puree is carinal and/or it does not splay mailing.; int7 -> int8: the fact that something is carinal and/or does not splay mailing is not wrong.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the tripling is a kind of a Brahmana.
sent3 -> int9: if that the mediator is not a cine-film or it communicates cancer or both is incorrect then it is not a Aertex.;
$hypothesis$ = the tripling is a Brahmana. ; $context$ = sent1: if the puree is criminological or is a kind of a Aertex or both then the cancer is not a cine-film. sent2: if something either is carinal or does not splay mailing or both the tripling is not a Brahmana. sent3: if that something is not a cine-film and/or it communicates cancer does not hold then it is not a kind of a Aertex. sent4: the cancer is not cetacean and is non-deconstructionist. sent5: the crosse is not carinal if it is not a ephemerality. sent6: if the cancer is both not a cetacean and not deconstructionist then it does communicate cancer. sent7: the fact that the cancer is criminological and a Brahmana is not correct if the mediator is not a Aertex. sent8: if the puree is not a kind of a Brahmana the tripling is a kind of a Brahmana. sent9: if the fact that the puree either is carinal or does not splay mailing or both does not hold it is not non-criminological. sent10: if that the cancer is not a kind of a cine-film hold then it does not communicate cancer. sent11: the puree is not a Brahmana if that that the cancer is criminological a Brahmana is not wrong is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the puree is carinal and/or does not splay mailing is wrong.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the puree is criminological.; int1 -> int2: the puree is criminological or is a kind of a Aertex or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the cancer is not a cine-film.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the fact that the cancer does not communicate cancer is true.; sent6 & sent4 -> int5: the cancer does communicate cancer.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the puree is carinal and/or it does not splay mailing.; int7 -> int8: the fact that something is carinal and/or does not splay mailing is not wrong.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__