that there exists something such that if that it is not a store but non-Bismarckian does not hold it does suckle neoromanticism does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that something does not suckle jewels-of-opar and it is not a kind of a hypallage is not right it is a guru. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it does not maintain Requiem and it is not a question is not right then it suckles Oklahoma. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is Bismarckian is correct it suckles neoromanticism. sent4: the fact that the trainman suckles neoromanticism is right if it does not store and it is not Bismarckian. sent5: there is something such that if that it does not demagnetize sextillion and it is not azo is incorrect then it does shimmer. sent6: there is something such that if it is a store it suckles neoromanticism. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a store and is Bismarckian is incorrect then it does suckle neoromanticism. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not lucifugous and it is not receptive does not hold it does maintain sympathectomy. sent9: there is something such that if that it is non-tragicomic thing that is not a undernourishment is false then it is epicyclic. sent10: there is something such that if that it is a store and non-Bismarckian does not hold it suckles neoromanticism. sent11: there is something such that if that it is not an imperative and not news is false that it is Riemannian is correct. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not epicyclic and does not maintain CIS is incorrect it does suckle chef. sent13: that the jewels-of-opar is Bismarckian is right if that it does not maintain Triglochin and is not a dory is false. sent14: if the fact that the trainman is a store and is not Bismarckian does not hold it suckles neoromanticism. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it is not a Huston and it is not a kind of a longanberry hold is wrong the fact that it is a squall is not false. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a store and it is not Bismarckian then it suckles neoromanticism. sent17: the trainman suckles monograph if that it does not sediment and is not a ashcan is not true. sent18: if the trainman is Bismarckian it does suckle neoromanticism. sent19: if the fact that the trainman is not ethical and does not suckle neoromanticism is not right then it suckles Army. sent20: there exists something such that if that it is predictable and it is not a venography is false then it is underhand. sent21: if the fact that the trainman is both not a store and non-Bismarckian is not right it suckles neoromanticism.
sent21 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the enchantress does not suckle jewels-of-opar and it is not a kind of a hypallage does not hold then it is a guru.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it is not a store but non-Bismarckian does not hold it does suckle neoromanticism does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not suckle jewels-of-opar and it is not a kind of a hypallage is not right it is a guru. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it does not maintain Requiem and it is not a question is not right then it suckles Oklahoma. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is Bismarckian is correct it suckles neoromanticism. sent4: the fact that the trainman suckles neoromanticism is right if it does not store and it is not Bismarckian. sent5: there is something such that if that it does not demagnetize sextillion and it is not azo is incorrect then it does shimmer. sent6: there is something such that if it is a store it suckles neoromanticism. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a store and is Bismarckian is incorrect then it does suckle neoromanticism. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not lucifugous and it is not receptive does not hold it does maintain sympathectomy. sent9: there is something such that if that it is non-tragicomic thing that is not a undernourishment is false then it is epicyclic. sent10: there is something such that if that it is a store and non-Bismarckian does not hold it suckles neoromanticism. sent11: there is something such that if that it is not an imperative and not news is false that it is Riemannian is correct. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not epicyclic and does not maintain CIS is incorrect it does suckle chef. sent13: that the jewels-of-opar is Bismarckian is right if that it does not maintain Triglochin and is not a dory is false. sent14: if the fact that the trainman is a store and is not Bismarckian does not hold it suckles neoromanticism. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it is not a Huston and it is not a kind of a longanberry hold is wrong the fact that it is a squall is not false. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a store and it is not Bismarckian then it suckles neoromanticism. sent17: the trainman suckles monograph if that it does not sediment and is not a ashcan is not true. sent18: if the trainman is Bismarckian it does suckle neoromanticism. sent19: if the fact that the trainman is not ethical and does not suckle neoromanticism is not right then it suckles Army. sent20: there exists something such that if that it is predictable and it is not a venography is false then it is underhand. sent21: if the fact that the trainman is both not a store and non-Bismarckian is not right it suckles neoromanticism. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__