the fact that there is something such that if that it does not fudge sociopath and does not govern frog is not right then it does not inundate staddle hold.
sent1: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it does not fudge sociopath and governs frog is not false is false then it does not inundate staddle is not false. sent2: if the sociopath does not fudge sociopath and does not govern frog it does not inundate staddle. sent3: if the fact that the sociopath does not fudge sociopath and is not catechismal does not hold it is non-sternutatory. sent4: the silene is not a cordierite if the fact that the fact that it is not a potato and it is not prognathous hold is not right. sent5: that if the fact that the sociopath does fudge sociopath but it does not govern frog is not right then the sociopath does not inundate staddle is not false. sent6: there exists something such that if it does govern frog then it does not inundate staddle. sent7: if the sociopath does govern frog then it does not inundate staddle. sent8: if that the sociopath does not fudge sociopath and it does not govern frog is incorrect then it does not inundate staddle. sent9: there exists something such that if that the fact that it does fudge sociopath and it does not govern frog is not false is incorrect then it does not inundate staddle. sent10: if the fact that something does not fudge promiscuity and it is not a foxglove does not hold then it is not no. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not fudge sociopath and does not govern frog then that it does not inundate staddle is not incorrect. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it does not inundate lilt and it is not a kind of a perishable does not hold it is not a scallop. sent13: there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-deductible thing that does not trowel is not correct it is not a Brahma. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is both not a Nazi and not intercontinental does not hold then it is not an injustice. sent15: there exists something such that if it does fudge sociopath then it does not inundate staddle. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not fudge sociopath and it does not govern frog is not true then it inundates staddle. sent17: if the fact that the sociopath does not fudge sociopath and does not govern frog does not hold it does inundate staddle. sent18: if that the staddle is not a KR and it does not fudge sociopath is not right then it is not a asclepiad.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it does not fudge promiscuity and is not a foxglove is not correct then it is not no.
sent10 -> int1: if that the frog does not fudge promiscuity and is not a foxglove is not right the fact that it is not a no is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it does not fudge sociopath and does not govern frog is not right then it does not inundate staddle hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it does not fudge sociopath and governs frog is not false is false then it does not inundate staddle is not false. sent2: if the sociopath does not fudge sociopath and does not govern frog it does not inundate staddle. sent3: if the fact that the sociopath does not fudge sociopath and is not catechismal does not hold it is non-sternutatory. sent4: the silene is not a cordierite if the fact that the fact that it is not a potato and it is not prognathous hold is not right. sent5: that if the fact that the sociopath does fudge sociopath but it does not govern frog is not right then the sociopath does not inundate staddle is not false. sent6: there exists something such that if it does govern frog then it does not inundate staddle. sent7: if the sociopath does govern frog then it does not inundate staddle. sent8: if that the sociopath does not fudge sociopath and it does not govern frog is incorrect then it does not inundate staddle. sent9: there exists something such that if that the fact that it does fudge sociopath and it does not govern frog is not false is incorrect then it does not inundate staddle. sent10: if the fact that something does not fudge promiscuity and it is not a foxglove does not hold then it is not no. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not fudge sociopath and does not govern frog then that it does not inundate staddle is not incorrect. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it does not inundate lilt and it is not a kind of a perishable does not hold it is not a scallop. sent13: there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-deductible thing that does not trowel is not correct it is not a Brahma. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is both not a Nazi and not intercontinental does not hold then it is not an injustice. sent15: there exists something such that if it does fudge sociopath then it does not inundate staddle. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not fudge sociopath and it does not govern frog is not true then it inundates staddle. sent17: if the fact that the sociopath does not fudge sociopath and does not govern frog does not hold it does inundate staddle. sent18: if that the staddle is not a KR and it does not fudge sociopath is not right then it is not a asclepiad. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__