the handlebar does not recline slide and is not a kind of a Ammotragus.
sent1: if the isoantibody is a whippersnapper then it is not a Ammotragus. sent2: if that something is a kind of a rockslide that is unmodifiable is right the isoantibody is a kind of a clang. sent3: something is not a Ammotragus but a pushover if the fact that it is a whippersnapper is not wrong. sent4: if the handlebar is not unmodifiable it is deductive and a clang. sent5: if the isoantibody is not a kind of a whippersnapper and is a kind of a pushover then it is deductive. sent6: the handlebar is not a whippersnapper and not deductive if the isoantibody is a kind of a Ammotragus. sent7: the isoantibody is not a kind of a whippersnapper. sent8: there exists something such that it clangs and it is not deductive. sent9: if something does clang then it is not a whippersnapper and it is a kind of a pushover. sent10: the handlebar is not a Ammotragus if the isoantibody is deductive. sent11: if something is deductive it is not a kind of a whippersnapper and it does recline slide. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a rockslide and it is not unmodifiable then the isoantibody does clang. sent13: there is something such that it is a rockslide and it is not unmodifiable. sent14: there is something such that that it is not unmodifiable hold. sent15: if the handlebar does clang then the fact that it does not recline slide and is not a Ammotragus is not true. sent16: the handlebar does not recline slide and is not a Ammotragus if the isoantibody is deductive.
sent9 -> int1: if the isoantibody clangs it is not a kind of a whippersnapper and is a kind of a pushover.; sent13 & sent12 -> int2: the isoantibody is a clang.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the isoantibody is both not a whippersnapper and a pushover.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the isoantibody is deductive.; int4 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
that the handlebar does not recline slide and it is not a Ammotragus is false.
$hypothesis$ = the handlebar does not recline slide and is not a kind of a Ammotragus. ; $context$ = sent1: if the isoantibody is a whippersnapper then it is not a Ammotragus. sent2: if that something is a kind of a rockslide that is unmodifiable is right the isoantibody is a kind of a clang. sent3: something is not a Ammotragus but a pushover if the fact that it is a whippersnapper is not wrong. sent4: if the handlebar is not unmodifiable it is deductive and a clang. sent5: if the isoantibody is not a kind of a whippersnapper and is a kind of a pushover then it is deductive. sent6: the handlebar is not a whippersnapper and not deductive if the isoantibody is a kind of a Ammotragus. sent7: the isoantibody is not a kind of a whippersnapper. sent8: there exists something such that it clangs and it is not deductive. sent9: if something does clang then it is not a whippersnapper and it is a kind of a pushover. sent10: the handlebar is not a Ammotragus if the isoantibody is deductive. sent11: if something is deductive it is not a kind of a whippersnapper and it does recline slide. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a rockslide and it is not unmodifiable then the isoantibody does clang. sent13: there is something such that it is a rockslide and it is not unmodifiable. sent14: there is something such that that it is not unmodifiable hold. sent15: if the handlebar does clang then the fact that it does not recline slide and is not a Ammotragus is not true. sent16: the handlebar does not recline slide and is not a Ammotragus if the isoantibody is deductive. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the isoantibody clangs it is not a kind of a whippersnapper and is a kind of a pushover.; sent13 & sent12 -> int2: the isoantibody is a clang.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the isoantibody is both not a whippersnapper and a pushover.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the isoantibody is deductive.; int4 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__