the sunspot incriminates gecko.
sent1: if the fucus furnishes but it does not incriminate gecko then the monopolist does riddle understudy. sent2: the fucus is a kind of a temporal. sent3: the fucus furnishes and does not riddle understudy. sent4: if the fucus realizes and does not riddle understudy the monopolist does furnish. sent5: the fact that if the fucus riddles understudy but it does not incriminate gecko then the sunspot realizes is correct. sent6: if the fucus realizes and it does riddle understudy then the monopolist furnishes. sent7: the monopolist does incriminate gecko. sent8: the sunspot incriminates gecko if the monopolist does furnish. sent9: if something does not ensconce then it does not incriminate gecko and it does not furnish. sent10: the fucus does not riddle understudy. sent11: the sunspot riddles pennycress.
the sunspot does not incriminate gecko.
sent9 -> int1: the sunspot does not incriminate gecko and it does not furnish if it does not ensconce.;
$hypothesis$ = the sunspot incriminates gecko. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fucus furnishes but it does not incriminate gecko then the monopolist does riddle understudy. sent2: the fucus is a kind of a temporal. sent3: the fucus furnishes and does not riddle understudy. sent4: if the fucus realizes and does not riddle understudy the monopolist does furnish. sent5: the fact that if the fucus riddles understudy but it does not incriminate gecko then the sunspot realizes is correct. sent6: if the fucus realizes and it does riddle understudy then the monopolist furnishes. sent7: the monopolist does incriminate gecko. sent8: the sunspot incriminates gecko if the monopolist does furnish. sent9: if something does not ensconce then it does not incriminate gecko and it does not furnish. sent10: the fucus does not riddle understudy. sent11: the sunspot riddles pennycress. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__