the situation does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the nap does not occur is not incorrect if the windage does not occur and/or the landslide happens. sent2: that the nauticalness occurs and the bidding happens is brought about by the non-acceptableness. sent3: the dissenting handcar occurs if the guaranteeing Heller does not occur or the plural does not occur or both. sent4: the pluralness and the guaranteeing Heller happens. sent5: if the napping does not occur then the situation occurs. sent6: the situation is prevented by that the ribbing does not occur and the defloration happens. sent7: the fact that the hexangularness occurs but the guaranteeing bluetick does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the reversibleness is prevented by that the plural happens and the windage occurs. sent9: the defloration does not occur if the fact that the hexangularness happens and the guaranteeing bluetick does not occur is not right. sent10: the ergotropicness does not occur if the guaranteeing xenon happens. sent11: both the ribbing and the reversibleness occurs if the defloration does not occur.
sent4 -> int1: the plural happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the windage occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the plural and the windage happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the reversibleness does not occur.; sent9 & sent7 -> int4: the defloration does not occur.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the ribbing occurs and the reversible occurs.; int5 -> int6: the reversible occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the windage does not occur is not false.; int8 -> int9: the windage does not occur or the landslide occurs or both.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the fact that the napping does not occur hold.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the dissenting handcar happens.
$hypothesis$ = the situation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the nap does not occur is not incorrect if the windage does not occur and/or the landslide happens. sent2: that the nauticalness occurs and the bidding happens is brought about by the non-acceptableness. sent3: the dissenting handcar occurs if the guaranteeing Heller does not occur or the plural does not occur or both. sent4: the pluralness and the guaranteeing Heller happens. sent5: if the napping does not occur then the situation occurs. sent6: the situation is prevented by that the ribbing does not occur and the defloration happens. sent7: the fact that the hexangularness occurs but the guaranteeing bluetick does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the reversibleness is prevented by that the plural happens and the windage occurs. sent9: the defloration does not occur if the fact that the hexangularness happens and the guaranteeing bluetick does not occur is not right. sent10: the ergotropicness does not occur if the guaranteeing xenon happens. sent11: both the ribbing and the reversibleness occurs if the defloration does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the plural happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the windage occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the plural and the windage happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the reversibleness does not occur.; sent9 & sent7 -> int4: the defloration does not occur.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the ribbing occurs and the reversible occurs.; int5 -> int6: the reversible occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the windage does not occur is not false.; int8 -> int9: the windage does not occur or the landslide occurs or both.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the fact that the napping does not occur hold.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__