the chantry does not enjoy Azaleastrum but it does beat spermicide.
sent1: something does not soak and is aboral if that it is a kind of an aquarium hold. sent2: the cryptocoryne is not Anglophilic if there is something such that the fact that it is nonmodern is not false. sent3: the fact that the Oxford is not an ecology and/or does not enjoy scandalmongering hold. sent4: that the Oxford is not a raving or it is a parathormone or both does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an ecology. sent5: the thiabendazole is nonmodern if it is repetitive. sent6: if the Oxford is not a kind of an ecology and is not a raving it enjoys scandalmongering. sent7: that the Oxford is nonrepetitive but it is a scrofula is wrong. sent8: that something does not enjoy Azaleastrum but it beats spermicide is false if it does not soak. sent9: if the Oxford does not enjoy scandalmongering that it is not a kind of a scrofula hold. sent10: if the chantry is not aboral then the thiabendazole is not an aquarium and it does not soak. sent11: if something is not a kind of a scrofula then that the spermicide either is not a kind of a parathormone or raves or both is false. sent12: if the fact that something is an ecology is not false then the chantry does not beat spermicide. sent13: the thiabendazole is a kind of a raving. sent14: the Oxford is not a scrofula if that it is not a kind of an ecology is true. sent15: something is a kind of a parathormone if it does not beat spermicide and it is a kind of an aquarium. sent16: something is aboral. sent17: the fact that either the spermicide is not Anglophilic or it does rave or both is wrong. sent18: if something is not a kind of an aquarium and it does not soak it is repetitive. sent19: the chantry is not aboral if that it does not enjoy Azaleastrum and beats spermicide is false. sent20: the cryptocoryne is Anglophilic if the fact that the spermicide is not a parathormone or a raving or both does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chantry does not enjoy Azaleastrum but it beats spermicide does not hold.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the chantry is non-aboral.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the thiabendazole is not an aquarium and it does not soak is not wrong.; sent18 -> int3: if the thiabendazole is not an aquarium and it is not a kind of a soaking then it is repetitive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the thiabendazole is repetitive.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the thiabendazole is nonmodern.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is nonmodern.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the cryptocoryne is not Anglophilic.; sent3 & sent14 & sent9 -> int8: the Oxford is not a scrofula.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not a scrofula.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the fact that the spermicide is not a parathormone and/or it is a raving is not right.; sent20 & int10 -> int11: that the cryptocoryne is Anglophilic hold.; int7 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
that the chantry does not enjoy Azaleastrum and beats spermicide is incorrect.
sent8 -> int13: the fact that the chantry does not enjoy Azaleastrum but it beats spermicide is not right if it is not a soaking.; sent1 -> int14: if the chantry is a kind of an aquarium it is not a soaking and it is aboral.;
$hypothesis$ = the chantry does not enjoy Azaleastrum but it does beat spermicide. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not soak and is aboral if that it is a kind of an aquarium hold. sent2: the cryptocoryne is not Anglophilic if there is something such that the fact that it is nonmodern is not false. sent3: the fact that the Oxford is not an ecology and/or does not enjoy scandalmongering hold. sent4: that the Oxford is not a raving or it is a parathormone or both does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an ecology. sent5: the thiabendazole is nonmodern if it is repetitive. sent6: if the Oxford is not a kind of an ecology and is not a raving it enjoys scandalmongering. sent7: that the Oxford is nonrepetitive but it is a scrofula is wrong. sent8: that something does not enjoy Azaleastrum but it beats spermicide is false if it does not soak. sent9: if the Oxford does not enjoy scandalmongering that it is not a kind of a scrofula hold. sent10: if the chantry is not aboral then the thiabendazole is not an aquarium and it does not soak. sent11: if something is not a kind of a scrofula then that the spermicide either is not a kind of a parathormone or raves or both is false. sent12: if the fact that something is an ecology is not false then the chantry does not beat spermicide. sent13: the thiabendazole is a kind of a raving. sent14: the Oxford is not a scrofula if that it is not a kind of an ecology is true. sent15: something is a kind of a parathormone if it does not beat spermicide and it is a kind of an aquarium. sent16: something is aboral. sent17: the fact that either the spermicide is not Anglophilic or it does rave or both is wrong. sent18: if something is not a kind of an aquarium and it does not soak it is repetitive. sent19: the chantry is not aboral if that it does not enjoy Azaleastrum and beats spermicide is false. sent20: the cryptocoryne is Anglophilic if the fact that the spermicide is not a parathormone or a raving or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chantry does not enjoy Azaleastrum but it beats spermicide does not hold.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the chantry is non-aboral.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the thiabendazole is not an aquarium and it does not soak is not wrong.; sent18 -> int3: if the thiabendazole is not an aquarium and it is not a kind of a soaking then it is repetitive.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the thiabendazole is repetitive.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the thiabendazole is nonmodern.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is nonmodern.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the cryptocoryne is not Anglophilic.; sent3 & sent14 & sent9 -> int8: the Oxford is not a scrofula.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not a scrofula.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the fact that the spermicide is not a parathormone and/or it is a raving is not right.; sent20 & int10 -> int11: that the cryptocoryne is Anglophilic hold.; int7 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__