the fact that the cameraman does not erase ampere and is uncut does not hold.
sent1: something that does not bethink lysine is a kind of anticlimactic thing that is serous. sent2: the neurolinguist does erase dismemberment or does not sliver or both. sent3: that the neurolinguist erases ampere and is uncut is not true if the cameraman does not erases ampere. sent4: if something does not bethink Saussurea then it does not bethink lysine. sent5: if something does not sliver then it does not bethink Saussurea or it is not a kind of a remainder or both. sent6: that if the neurolinguist does erase dismemberment and/or it does not sliver the neurolinguist does not sliver is right. sent7: that the neurolinguist is non-sisterly thing that erases ampere is false. sent8: if that the neurolinguist is sisterly or not a sensuality or both hold the lunette does not erase ampere. sent9: something does not bethink lysine if it does not remainder. sent10: the neurolinguist is sisterly or it is not a sensuality or both.
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the lunette does not erase ampere.;
the cameraman does not erase ampere and is uncut.
sent1 -> int2: if the neurolinguist does not bethink lysine it is anticlimactic and it is serous.; sent5 -> int3: the neurolinguist either does not bethink Saussurea or does not remainder or both if that it does not sliver is right.; sent6 & sent2 -> int4: the neurolinguist does not sliver.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the neurolinguist does not bethink Saussurea or is not a remainder or both.; sent4 -> int6: the neurolinguist does not bethink lysine if it does not bethink Saussurea.; sent9 -> int7: if the neurolinguist is not a kind of a remainder then that it does not bethink lysine is not wrong.; int5 & int6 & int7 -> int8: the neurolinguist does not bethink lysine.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the neurolinguist is not non-anticlimactic and it is serous.; int9 -> int10: the neurolinguist is anticlimactic.; int10 -> int11: something is anticlimactic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cameraman does not erase ampere and is uncut does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not bethink lysine is a kind of anticlimactic thing that is serous. sent2: the neurolinguist does erase dismemberment or does not sliver or both. sent3: that the neurolinguist erases ampere and is uncut is not true if the cameraman does not erases ampere. sent4: if something does not bethink Saussurea then it does not bethink lysine. sent5: if something does not sliver then it does not bethink Saussurea or it is not a kind of a remainder or both. sent6: that if the neurolinguist does erase dismemberment and/or it does not sliver the neurolinguist does not sliver is right. sent7: that the neurolinguist is non-sisterly thing that erases ampere is false. sent8: if that the neurolinguist is sisterly or not a sensuality or both hold the lunette does not erase ampere. sent9: something does not bethink lysine if it does not remainder. sent10: the neurolinguist is sisterly or it is not a sensuality or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the lunette does not erase ampere.; __UNKNOWN__