the kumquat is not prosthodontics.
sent1: if the maigre does damp impasto the kumquat rolls Falconidae. sent2: if the maigre is a Czech and it mummifies Barthelme the recognition is a Centre. sent3: if the maigre is not a Czech and mummifies Barthelme then the recognition is a Centre. sent4: if the kumquat does damp impasto then it is prosthodontics. sent5: if the kumquat is a kind of a dissolve the fact that it does damp impasto is not incorrect. sent6: the maigre is not a kind of a Czech. sent7: if something does damp impasto then the fact that it is a Centre is not right. sent8: if the kumquat rolls Falconidae it does dissolve. sent9: the electrodynamometer is not microscopic but it is prosthodontics. sent10: the maigre is not a kind of a Czech but it does mummify Barthelme. sent11: if the maigre is not a Centre and/or it is not a dissolve then the kumquat does not roll Falconidae. sent12: if something does not roll Falconidae then it is not prosthodontics. sent13: if the recognition is a Centre the kumquat does roll Falconidae.
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the recognition is a Centre.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the kumquat rolls Falconidae.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the kumquat is a dissolve.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the kumquat damps impasto.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the kumquat is not prosthodontics.
sent12 -> int5: if the kumquat does not roll Falconidae it is not prosthodontics.; sent7 -> int6: if the fact that the recognition damps impasto hold then the fact that it is not a Centre is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the kumquat is not prosthodontics. ; $context$ = sent1: if the maigre does damp impasto the kumquat rolls Falconidae. sent2: if the maigre is a Czech and it mummifies Barthelme the recognition is a Centre. sent3: if the maigre is not a Czech and mummifies Barthelme then the recognition is a Centre. sent4: if the kumquat does damp impasto then it is prosthodontics. sent5: if the kumquat is a kind of a dissolve the fact that it does damp impasto is not incorrect. sent6: the maigre is not a kind of a Czech. sent7: if something does damp impasto then the fact that it is a Centre is not right. sent8: if the kumquat rolls Falconidae it does dissolve. sent9: the electrodynamometer is not microscopic but it is prosthodontics. sent10: the maigre is not a kind of a Czech but it does mummify Barthelme. sent11: if the maigre is not a Centre and/or it is not a dissolve then the kumquat does not roll Falconidae. sent12: if something does not roll Falconidae then it is not prosthodontics. sent13: if the recognition is a Centre the kumquat does roll Falconidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the recognition is a Centre.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the kumquat rolls Falconidae.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the kumquat is a dissolve.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the kumquat damps impasto.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__