there is something such that if it does not batch knee then that it is nonpolitical and it is blastocoelic does not hold.
sent1: if the showman does batch knee then the fact that the fact that it is both nonpolitical and blastocoelic is correct is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a Angelus then the fact that it is inorganic and it is a Lippizan is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it does not batch knee it is both nonpolitical and blastocoelic. sent4: the fact that something is breathless and is a kind of a Parulidae is incorrect if it is not a chromosome. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not uncritical then that it is a golem and it does stagger dongle is wrong. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not stagger Willebrand the fact that it does batch porphyry and batches showman is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a composite then the fact that it is a wafer and it is a Syrian does not hold. sent8: the showman is nonpolitical and it is blastocoelic if it does not batch knee. sent9: there is something such that if it does batch knee that it is not political and not non-blastocoelic does not hold. sent10: the fact that that the showman is nonpolitical and it is blastocoelic is true does not hold if it does not batch knee. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it does not batch timolol is right the fact that it does slap and it batches ID is not right. sent12: that something is a borrower and it does batch Leptoglossus does not hold if the fact that it is not porphyritic is not wrong.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if the showman is not a chromosome then that it is breathless and is a Parulidae is incorrect.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not batch knee then that it is nonpolitical and it is blastocoelic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the showman does batch knee then the fact that the fact that it is both nonpolitical and blastocoelic is correct is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a Angelus then the fact that it is inorganic and it is a Lippizan is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it does not batch knee it is both nonpolitical and blastocoelic. sent4: the fact that something is breathless and is a kind of a Parulidae is incorrect if it is not a chromosome. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not uncritical then that it is a golem and it does stagger dongle is wrong. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not stagger Willebrand the fact that it does batch porphyry and batches showman is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a composite then the fact that it is a wafer and it is a Syrian does not hold. sent8: the showman is nonpolitical and it is blastocoelic if it does not batch knee. sent9: there is something such that if it does batch knee that it is not political and not non-blastocoelic does not hold. sent10: the fact that that the showman is nonpolitical and it is blastocoelic is true does not hold if it does not batch knee. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it does not batch timolol is right the fact that it does slap and it batches ID is not right. sent12: that something is a borrower and it does batch Leptoglossus does not hold if the fact that it is not porphyritic is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__