the wonton does stickle insightfulness or is not a kind of a neutralist or both if that the orphenadrine collogues czar hold.
sent1: if there exists something such that it connotes and it collogues czar the wonton is a kind of a neutralist. sent2: something connotes. sent3: if something connotes and does collogue czar the wonton is not a neutralist. sent4: the fact that the wonton is a neutralist is correct. sent5: there exists something such that it collogues czar. sent6: the wonton does stickle insightfulness and/or is a kind of a neutralist. sent7: if the fact that there are non-unfree things is not incorrect the fact that the orphenadrine is haemophilic and does minstrel complacency does not hold. sent8: if the orphenadrine does minstrel complacency the fact that it connotes is right. sent9: something collogues czar if it is a neutralist. sent10: if something is not haemophilic then the fact that it is a dome and it is unfree is wrong. sent11: the fact that the orphenadrine is haemophilic and it minstrels complacency is not true. sent12: there exists something such that it is not unfree. sent13: if that the wonton does connote or it does not minstrel complacency or both is incorrect then the orphenadrine is not haemophilic. sent14: the orphenadrine does not stickle insightfulness if there is something such that it collogues czar and is haemophilic. sent15: something does connote if it minstrels complacency. sent16: something does connote if that it is haemophilic and does not minstrel complacency does not hold. sent17: if the orphenadrine does collogue czar then the wonton either does stickle insightfulness or is a neutralist or both. sent18: something is not a dome if the fact that it is a dome and it is unfree is false. sent19: there is something such that that it is unfree is not incorrect.
sent16 -> int1: the orphenadrine does connote if the fact that it is haemophilic and it does not minstrel complacency is not correct.;
there is something such that it is not a dome.
sent18 -> int2: the orphenadrine is not a dome if the fact that it is both a dome and unfree does not hold.; sent10 -> int3: if the orphenadrine is not haemophilic that it is a kind of a dome and is unfree does not hold.; sent9 -> int4: the wonton collogues czar if it is a neutralist.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the wonton collogues czar.;
$hypothesis$ = the wonton does stickle insightfulness or is not a kind of a neutralist or both if that the orphenadrine collogues czar hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it connotes and it collogues czar the wonton is a kind of a neutralist. sent2: something connotes. sent3: if something connotes and does collogue czar the wonton is not a neutralist. sent4: the fact that the wonton is a neutralist is correct. sent5: there exists something such that it collogues czar. sent6: the wonton does stickle insightfulness and/or is a kind of a neutralist. sent7: if the fact that there are non-unfree things is not incorrect the fact that the orphenadrine is haemophilic and does minstrel complacency does not hold. sent8: if the orphenadrine does minstrel complacency the fact that it connotes is right. sent9: something collogues czar if it is a neutralist. sent10: if something is not haemophilic then the fact that it is a dome and it is unfree is wrong. sent11: the fact that the orphenadrine is haemophilic and it minstrels complacency is not true. sent12: there exists something such that it is not unfree. sent13: if that the wonton does connote or it does not minstrel complacency or both is incorrect then the orphenadrine is not haemophilic. sent14: the orphenadrine does not stickle insightfulness if there is something such that it collogues czar and is haemophilic. sent15: something does connote if it minstrels complacency. sent16: something does connote if that it is haemophilic and does not minstrel complacency does not hold. sent17: if the orphenadrine does collogue czar then the wonton either does stickle insightfulness or is a neutralist or both. sent18: something is not a dome if the fact that it is a dome and it is unfree is false. sent19: there is something such that that it is unfree is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the orphenadrine does connote if the fact that it is haemophilic and it does not minstrel complacency is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__