the laparoscope braids singles.
sent1: the fact that the laparoscope does not breakfast recess and does not amerce savoir-faire is not right if it braids singles. sent2: the escargot is a Pastor. sent3: if the bluster is congruous the autopilot is congruous. sent4: the autopilot is congruous thing that is a micrometeorite. sent5: the autopilot is congruous. sent6: the fact that if there exists something such that that it does not breakfast recess and does not amerce savoir-faire does not hold then the critter does not accept Melampsoraceae is not false. sent7: the fact that the autopilot is a kind of a tesla that is precordial is incorrect if the critter does not accept Melampsoraceae. sent8: the garboard is congruous. sent9: that the autopilot is congruous is correct if the bluster is a kind of a telephonist. sent10: the autopilot is a kind of a cytomegalovirus that braids winch. sent11: if that something is not precordial is true then it is not a micrometeorite. sent12: if there is something such that it breakfasts recess then the laparoscope is not a kind of a tesla. sent13: if the laparoscope braids singles that it does not breakfast recess and it amerces savoir-faire is not right. sent14: the fact that if that something is a tesla and it is precordial is not correct it is not a micrometeorite is not wrong. sent15: if something is congruous the bluster is a telephonist and/or it is congruous. sent16: if the laparoscope does not accept Melampsoraceae the Achaean is not a micrometeorite and it does not braid singles.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the laparoscope does braid singles.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the laparoscope does not breakfast recess and it does not amerce savoir-faire is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does not breakfast recess and does not amerce savoir-faire is not true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the critter does not accept Melampsoraceae.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the autopilot is a tesla and is precordial is wrong.; sent14 -> int5: if the fact that the autopilot is a tesla and it is precordial does not hold it is not a kind of a micrometeorite.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the autopilot is not a micrometeorite.; sent4 -> int7: the autopilot is a micrometeorite.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the laparoscope braids singles.
sent8 -> int9: there are congruous things.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the bluster is a telephonist or it is congruous or both.; int10 & sent9 & sent3 -> int11: the autopilot is congruous.;
$hypothesis$ = the laparoscope braids singles. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the laparoscope does not breakfast recess and does not amerce savoir-faire is not right if it braids singles. sent2: the escargot is a Pastor. sent3: if the bluster is congruous the autopilot is congruous. sent4: the autopilot is congruous thing that is a micrometeorite. sent5: the autopilot is congruous. sent6: the fact that if there exists something such that that it does not breakfast recess and does not amerce savoir-faire does not hold then the critter does not accept Melampsoraceae is not false. sent7: the fact that the autopilot is a kind of a tesla that is precordial is incorrect if the critter does not accept Melampsoraceae. sent8: the garboard is congruous. sent9: that the autopilot is congruous is correct if the bluster is a kind of a telephonist. sent10: the autopilot is a kind of a cytomegalovirus that braids winch. sent11: if that something is not precordial is true then it is not a micrometeorite. sent12: if there is something such that it breakfasts recess then the laparoscope is not a kind of a tesla. sent13: if the laparoscope braids singles that it does not breakfast recess and it amerces savoir-faire is not right. sent14: the fact that if that something is a tesla and it is precordial is not correct it is not a micrometeorite is not wrong. sent15: if something is congruous the bluster is a telephonist and/or it is congruous. sent16: if the laparoscope does not accept Melampsoraceae the Achaean is not a micrometeorite and it does not braid singles. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the laparoscope does braid singles.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the laparoscope does not breakfast recess and it does not amerce savoir-faire is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does not breakfast recess and does not amerce savoir-faire is not true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the critter does not accept Melampsoraceae.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the autopilot is a tesla and is precordial is wrong.; sent14 -> int5: if the fact that the autopilot is a tesla and it is precordial does not hold it is not a kind of a micrometeorite.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the autopilot is not a micrometeorite.; sent4 -> int7: the autopilot is a micrometeorite.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__