the aerophile does not even stephanion but it commingles.
sent1: if the stephanion does even stephanion then the aerophile does not even stephanion and does commingle. sent2: if the coriander is non-irreducible a kinescope then the Contras is not a hindlimb. sent3: that the WWW is dominical is not incorrect if the dacite views and/or is not impermissible. sent4: if the dacite does not bear lightness then the fact that the coriander either is a kind of a kinescope or does view or both does not hold. sent5: the fact that the stephanion is dominical and/or it does not bear lightness is not correct if the WWW is dominical. sent6: the dacite does commingle. sent7: if the fact that the itinerant is impermissible or does bear lightness or both is incorrect then the stephanion does not houseclean bacca. sent8: if the Contras either is a hindlimb or is not an abrasion or both then the aerophile does even stephanion. sent9: the coriander is not irreducible and is a kinescope. sent10: if the fact that something is dominical and/or it does not bear lightness is incorrect it does even stephanion. sent11: that the itinerant does houseclean bacca or is a kind of an abrasion or both is not correct if the fact that the Contras is not a kind of a hindlimb is true. sent12: the itinerant commingles. sent13: if the marksman is not impermissible the dacite is a view or not impermissible or both. sent14: the marksman is not impermissible if that the itinerant does houseclean bacca or it is an abrasion or both does not hold.
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the Contras is not a kind of a hindlimb.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the itinerant housecleans bacca and/or is an abrasion is not true.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the marksman is not impermissible.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: either the dacite is a view or it is not impermissible or both.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the WWW is dominical hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the stephanion is dominical and/or it does not bear lightness is incorrect.; sent10 -> int7: if that the stephanion is dominical or it does not bear lightness or both is not correct it evens stephanion.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the stephanion does even stephanion.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the aerophile does not even stephanion but it commingles. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stephanion does even stephanion then the aerophile does not even stephanion and does commingle. sent2: if the coriander is non-irreducible a kinescope then the Contras is not a hindlimb. sent3: that the WWW is dominical is not incorrect if the dacite views and/or is not impermissible. sent4: if the dacite does not bear lightness then the fact that the coriander either is a kind of a kinescope or does view or both does not hold. sent5: the fact that the stephanion is dominical and/or it does not bear lightness is not correct if the WWW is dominical. sent6: the dacite does commingle. sent7: if the fact that the itinerant is impermissible or does bear lightness or both is incorrect then the stephanion does not houseclean bacca. sent8: if the Contras either is a hindlimb or is not an abrasion or both then the aerophile does even stephanion. sent9: the coriander is not irreducible and is a kinescope. sent10: if the fact that something is dominical and/or it does not bear lightness is incorrect it does even stephanion. sent11: that the itinerant does houseclean bacca or is a kind of an abrasion or both is not correct if the fact that the Contras is not a kind of a hindlimb is true. sent12: the itinerant commingles. sent13: if the marksman is not impermissible the dacite is a view or not impermissible or both. sent14: the marksman is not impermissible if that the itinerant does houseclean bacca or it is an abrasion or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the Contras is not a kind of a hindlimb.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the itinerant housecleans bacca and/or is an abrasion is not true.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the marksman is not impermissible.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: either the dacite is a view or it is not impermissible or both.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the WWW is dominical hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the stephanion is dominical and/or it does not bear lightness is incorrect.; sent10 -> int7: if that the stephanion is dominical or it does not bear lightness or both is not correct it evens stephanion.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the stephanion does even stephanion.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__