the fact that the override is both a dust and not instructive is incorrect.
sent1: if something does bead acquisition but it is not a dust it is instructive. sent2: if something is a backsaw then it is a carol and it is not masculine. sent3: the rogue is not unoriginal but it is albinal. sent4: if the override is instructive that the rogue is not unoriginal but it is albinal does not hold. sent5: there is something such that it is not a specific. sent6: the anomalopteryx is theist if the fact that it is a kind of an entrapment is correct. sent7: the rogue is albinal. sent8: the arthritic is a backsaw if the constrictor does ice breadfruit. sent9: if the arthritic does carol but it is not a masculine the breadfruit does poise. sent10: the rogue is a loading or is a pannikin or both if the breadfruit does not spoon irreplaceableness. sent11: if the constrictor is a Chamaecytisus then the arthritic is a kind of a backsaw. sent12: if the breadfruit is not a finnan then the rogue is a pannikin and it spoons irreplaceableness. sent13: if something does load then it beads acquisition. sent14: if either something does not spoon irreplaceableness or it is a finnan or both it does not spoon irreplaceableness. sent15: the anomalopteryx is an entrapment and it is a vicissitude if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a specific. sent16: the fact that the override is both not albinal and instructive is false if the rogue beads acquisition. sent17: the breadfruit is not a finnan if that the arthritic poises and is a kind of a masculine does not hold. sent18: if the rogue beads acquisition the fact that the override dusts and is not instructive is not right. sent19: the override does bead acquisition and it is a dust. sent20: there is something such that it is not a kind of a carol. sent21: the constrictor either is a Chamaecytisus or does ice breadfruit or both if there exists something such that it is a theist. sent22: if something poises either it does not spoon irreplaceableness or it is a kind of a finnan or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the override is instructive is correct.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the rogue is non-unoriginal thing that is albinal is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the override is not instructive.; sent19 -> int4: the override is a kind of a dust.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the override is a dust and not instructive is wrong.
sent14 -> int5: the breadfruit does not spoon irreplaceableness if either it does not spoon irreplaceableness or it is a finnan or both.; sent22 -> int6: if the breadfruit poises then it does not spoon irreplaceableness or is a kind of a finnan or both.; sent2 -> int7: the arthritic is a carol but not a masculine if the fact that it is not a backsaw is not right.; sent5 & sent15 -> int8: the anomalopteryx is an entrapment that is a kind of a vicissitude.; int8 -> int9: the anomalopteryx is an entrapment.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the anomalopteryx is a theist.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a theist.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the constrictor is a Chamaecytisus or ices breadfruit or both.; int12 & sent11 & sent8 -> int13: the arthritic is a kind of a backsaw.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the arthritic is a carol but it is not masculine.; sent9 & int14 -> int15: the breadfruit is a poised.; int6 & int15 -> int16: the breadfruit does not spoon irreplaceableness or it is a finnan or both.; int5 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the breadfruit does not spoon irreplaceableness is not false.; sent10 & int17 -> int18: the rogue loads or it is a pannikin or both.; sent13 -> int19: if the rogue loads it beads acquisition.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the override is both a dust and not instructive is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does bead acquisition but it is not a dust it is instructive. sent2: if something is a backsaw then it is a carol and it is not masculine. sent3: the rogue is not unoriginal but it is albinal. sent4: if the override is instructive that the rogue is not unoriginal but it is albinal does not hold. sent5: there is something such that it is not a specific. sent6: the anomalopteryx is theist if the fact that it is a kind of an entrapment is correct. sent7: the rogue is albinal. sent8: the arthritic is a backsaw if the constrictor does ice breadfruit. sent9: if the arthritic does carol but it is not a masculine the breadfruit does poise. sent10: the rogue is a loading or is a pannikin or both if the breadfruit does not spoon irreplaceableness. sent11: if the constrictor is a Chamaecytisus then the arthritic is a kind of a backsaw. sent12: if the breadfruit is not a finnan then the rogue is a pannikin and it spoons irreplaceableness. sent13: if something does load then it beads acquisition. sent14: if either something does not spoon irreplaceableness or it is a finnan or both it does not spoon irreplaceableness. sent15: the anomalopteryx is an entrapment and it is a vicissitude if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a specific. sent16: the fact that the override is both not albinal and instructive is false if the rogue beads acquisition. sent17: the breadfruit is not a finnan if that the arthritic poises and is a kind of a masculine does not hold. sent18: if the rogue beads acquisition the fact that the override dusts and is not instructive is not right. sent19: the override does bead acquisition and it is a dust. sent20: there is something such that it is not a kind of a carol. sent21: the constrictor either is a Chamaecytisus or does ice breadfruit or both if there exists something such that it is a theist. sent22: if something poises either it does not spoon irreplaceableness or it is a kind of a finnan or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the override is instructive is correct.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the rogue is non-unoriginal thing that is albinal is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the override is not instructive.; sent19 -> int4: the override is a kind of a dust.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__