that the fructose is not toothed and does hand durbar if the navel is not a amiodarone is not correct.
sent1: the navel does hand durbar if a non-ectomorphic thing is not a amiodarone. sent2: the fructose is vitreous. sent3: if the wain is a viaduct then it is vitreous. sent4: if the fact that something is vitreous hold then that it is a Marxist is not incorrect. sent5: something is not ectomorphic but it is a amiodarone. sent6: the navel is not ectomorphic. sent7: there exists something such that it is ectomorphic thing that is not a kind of a amiodarone. sent8: the navel is toothless and it is a Marxist if the fact that the fructose is not vitreous is right. sent9: the navel is toothless. sent10: if something is a kind of a Marxist then it hands durbar. sent11: something that is not a Marxist is a amiodarone and/or hands durbar. sent12: if the navel is a amiodarone the fructose is a kind of toothless thing that hands durbar. sent13: that if the wain is vitreous then that the wain is a kind of a Marxist and is not a voyager is false hold. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a amiodarone. sent15: if something is not non-microbial it is acceptive. sent16: the fructose is ectomorphic. sent17: the lochia is a aspergill if the fact that it is cautious is true. sent18: there is something such that it is not toothless and it does not hand durbar. sent19: the fructose is toothless if there exists something such that it is not ectomorphic and it is not a kind of a amiodarone. sent20: if that something is both toothless and not ectomorphic is incorrect then it is ectomorphic. sent21: there is something such that it is not ectomorphic. sent22: that the redwood is toothless but it is not ectomorphic is not true if the navel is a kind of a amiodarone.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the navel is not a amiodarone.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the navel is a kind of non-ectomorphic thing that is not a amiodarone.; int1 -> int2: something is non-ectomorphic thing that is not a amiodarone.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the fructose is not toothed.; sent10 -> int4: if the fructose is a Marxist it hands durbar.; sent4 -> int5: the fructose is a Marxist if it is vitreous.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the fructose is Marxist is not false.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the fructose hands durbar hold.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the fructose is toothless and does hand durbar.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the redwood is ectomorphic.
sent20 -> int9: if the fact that the fact that the redwood is toothless thing that is not ectomorphic is correct does not hold it is ectomorphic.; sent11 -> int10: the fructose is a amiodarone and/or does hand durbar if it is not a kind of a Marxist.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fructose is not toothed and does hand durbar if the navel is not a amiodarone is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the navel does hand durbar if a non-ectomorphic thing is not a amiodarone. sent2: the fructose is vitreous. sent3: if the wain is a viaduct then it is vitreous. sent4: if the fact that something is vitreous hold then that it is a Marxist is not incorrect. sent5: something is not ectomorphic but it is a amiodarone. sent6: the navel is not ectomorphic. sent7: there exists something such that it is ectomorphic thing that is not a kind of a amiodarone. sent8: the navel is toothless and it is a Marxist if the fact that the fructose is not vitreous is right. sent9: the navel is toothless. sent10: if something is a kind of a Marxist then it hands durbar. sent11: something that is not a Marxist is a amiodarone and/or hands durbar. sent12: if the navel is a amiodarone the fructose is a kind of toothless thing that hands durbar. sent13: that if the wain is vitreous then that the wain is a kind of a Marxist and is not a voyager is false hold. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a amiodarone. sent15: if something is not non-microbial it is acceptive. sent16: the fructose is ectomorphic. sent17: the lochia is a aspergill if the fact that it is cautious is true. sent18: there is something such that it is not toothless and it does not hand durbar. sent19: the fructose is toothless if there exists something such that it is not ectomorphic and it is not a kind of a amiodarone. sent20: if that something is both toothless and not ectomorphic is incorrect then it is ectomorphic. sent21: there is something such that it is not ectomorphic. sent22: that the redwood is toothless but it is not ectomorphic is not true if the navel is a kind of a amiodarone. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the navel is not a amiodarone.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the navel is a kind of non-ectomorphic thing that is not a amiodarone.; int1 -> int2: something is non-ectomorphic thing that is not a amiodarone.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the fructose is not toothed.; sent10 -> int4: if the fructose is a Marxist it hands durbar.; sent4 -> int5: the fructose is a Marxist if it is vitreous.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the fructose is Marxist is not false.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the fructose hands durbar hold.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the fructose is toothless and does hand durbar.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__