if the fact that the slugging Bombycidae does not occur and/or the pall-mall happens is wrong then the meatlessness occurs.
sent1: that the waning happens is not wrong. sent2: the overriding concatenation occurs. sent3: the shedding occurs if the fact that the slugging Bombycidae happens is true. sent4: if the slugging Bombycidae does not occur or the pall-mall happens or both then the meatlessness occurs. sent5: if the pall-mall does not occur then the defenestration does not occur. sent6: the slugging Bombycidae happens if the fact that the slugging Bombycidae does not occur and the defenestration does not occur is false. sent7: the overriding midrib does not occur if the fact that the terminalness does not occur but the skeletalness occurs is not correct. sent8: the accomplishment does not occur if the snipe occurs. sent9: the fact that the non-terminalness and the skeletalness occurs does not hold if the defenestration does not occur. sent10: the fact that that the slugging Bombycidae does not occur and the defenestration does not occur does not hold is true. sent11: if the overriding midrib does not occur the overriding concatenation and the meatlessness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pall-mall occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the slugging Bombycidae does not occur or the pall-mall happens or both.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the slugging Bombycidae does not occur and/or the pall-mall happens is not right.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pall-mall does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the defenestration does not occur.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: that both the non-terminalness and the skeletalness happens is not true.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the overriding midrib does not occur.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the overriding concatenation happens and the meatlessness happens.; int7 -> int8: the meatlessness occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the shedding occurs.
sent6 & sent10 -> int9: that the slugging Bombycidae happens hold.; sent3 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the slugging Bombycidae does not occur and/or the pall-mall happens is wrong then the meatlessness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the waning happens is not wrong. sent2: the overriding concatenation occurs. sent3: the shedding occurs if the fact that the slugging Bombycidae happens is true. sent4: if the slugging Bombycidae does not occur or the pall-mall happens or both then the meatlessness occurs. sent5: if the pall-mall does not occur then the defenestration does not occur. sent6: the slugging Bombycidae happens if the fact that the slugging Bombycidae does not occur and the defenestration does not occur is false. sent7: the overriding midrib does not occur if the fact that the terminalness does not occur but the skeletalness occurs is not correct. sent8: the accomplishment does not occur if the snipe occurs. sent9: the fact that the non-terminalness and the skeletalness occurs does not hold if the defenestration does not occur. sent10: the fact that that the slugging Bombycidae does not occur and the defenestration does not occur does not hold is true. sent11: if the overriding midrib does not occur the overriding concatenation and the meatlessness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pall-mall occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the slugging Bombycidae does not occur or the pall-mall happens or both.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the slugging Bombycidae does not occur and/or the pall-mall happens is not right.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pall-mall does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the defenestration does not occur.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: that both the non-terminalness and the skeletalness happens is not true.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the overriding midrib does not occur.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the overriding concatenation happens and the meatlessness happens.; int7 -> int8: the meatlessness occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__