the voter does destroy.
sent1: the lining is not a kind of a fireball. sent2: the fact that if the acrylamide is not a regnellidium then the parish is not a kind of a regnellidium but it does disembowel tilt hold. sent3: the fact that something does disembowel tilt and yields parish does not hold if it is not a kind of a regnellidium. sent4: if the lining is not a fireball then the acrylamide does not yield parish. sent5: the hematologist is monometallic. sent6: there is something such that that it is not non-moneran is right. sent7: if something does not yield parish then it is not a regnellidium. sent8: that the parish is not a regnellidium is true. sent9: the ninepins does not yield parish but it is unprofessional. sent10: the hematologist is a kind of a regnellidium. sent11: something is moneran and it is a kind of a Corchorus. sent12: if the fact that something destroys and is a fireball is false then it does not destroys. sent13: if the voter does not destroy then it is not a moneran. sent14: if the parish is a regnellidium that does disembowel tilt then it is monometallic. sent15: if a monometallic thing is moneran then the hematologist is a Corchorus. sent16: the parish is not bivalent. sent17: if the hematologist is a Corchorus then the voter does destroy. sent18: if the acrylamide does not disembowel tilt then the parish does not disembowel tilt but it is a regnellidium. sent19: something does not yield parish if that it disembowels tilt and it does yield parish is wrong. sent20: if something does not yield parish then the fact that it destroys and it is a fireball is wrong. sent21: something is monometallic if it is a regnellidium that disembowels tilt. sent22: there exists something such that it is monometallic. sent23: that the hematologist does not destroy and is a fireball if the acrylamide does not destroy is not wrong. sent24: something that is not a regnellidium and does disembowel tilt is monometallic. sent25: the fact that the parish is not a kind of a regnellidium if the acrylamide is not a regnellidium hold.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: that the acrylamide does not yield parish is not false.; sent7 -> int2: if the acrylamide does not yield parish then it is not a regnellidium.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the acrylamide is not a kind of a regnellidium.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the parish is not a regnellidium but it disembowels tilt.; sent24 -> int5: the parish is monometallic if it is not a regnellidium and it disembowels tilt.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the parish is monometallic.;
the voter does not destroy.
sent12 -> int7: if that the voter does destroy and is a kind of a fireball is false then it does not destroy.; sent20 -> int8: the fact that the voter destroys and is a fireball is not correct if it does not yield parish.; sent19 -> int9: if the fact that the voter does disembowel tilt and yields parish does not hold it does not yields parish.; sent3 -> int10: if the voter is not a kind of a regnellidium the fact that it does disembowel tilt and yields parish does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the voter does destroy. ; $context$ = sent1: the lining is not a kind of a fireball. sent2: the fact that if the acrylamide is not a regnellidium then the parish is not a kind of a regnellidium but it does disembowel tilt hold. sent3: the fact that something does disembowel tilt and yields parish does not hold if it is not a kind of a regnellidium. sent4: if the lining is not a fireball then the acrylamide does not yield parish. sent5: the hematologist is monometallic. sent6: there is something such that that it is not non-moneran is right. sent7: if something does not yield parish then it is not a regnellidium. sent8: that the parish is not a regnellidium is true. sent9: the ninepins does not yield parish but it is unprofessional. sent10: the hematologist is a kind of a regnellidium. sent11: something is moneran and it is a kind of a Corchorus. sent12: if the fact that something destroys and is a fireball is false then it does not destroys. sent13: if the voter does not destroy then it is not a moneran. sent14: if the parish is a regnellidium that does disembowel tilt then it is monometallic. sent15: if a monometallic thing is moneran then the hematologist is a Corchorus. sent16: the parish is not bivalent. sent17: if the hematologist is a Corchorus then the voter does destroy. sent18: if the acrylamide does not disembowel tilt then the parish does not disembowel tilt but it is a regnellidium. sent19: something does not yield parish if that it disembowels tilt and it does yield parish is wrong. sent20: if something does not yield parish then the fact that it destroys and it is a fireball is wrong. sent21: something is monometallic if it is a regnellidium that disembowels tilt. sent22: there exists something such that it is monometallic. sent23: that the hematologist does not destroy and is a fireball if the acrylamide does not destroy is not wrong. sent24: something that is not a regnellidium and does disembowel tilt is monometallic. sent25: the fact that the parish is not a kind of a regnellidium if the acrylamide is not a regnellidium hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: that the acrylamide does not yield parish is not false.; sent7 -> int2: if the acrylamide does not yield parish then it is not a regnellidium.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the acrylamide is not a kind of a regnellidium.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the parish is not a regnellidium but it disembowels tilt.; sent24 -> int5: the parish is monometallic if it is not a regnellidium and it disembowels tilt.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the parish is monometallic.; __UNKNOWN__