the fact that if the demonstration happens the serendipity does not occur but the compound happens is false.
sent1: the artificialness does not occur. sent2: that the artificialness does not occur is caused by the nonhumanness. sent3: that both the non-artificialness and the arseniousness occurs triggers that the compoundness occurs. sent4: the hammerlock occurs. sent5: if the humanness does not occur then not the artificialness but the arseniousness occurs. sent6: that the nagging by-product happens is not false. sent7: if both the hammerlock and the demonstration occurs then the fact that the serendipity does not occur is true. sent8: if the archaeologicalness and the deactivation occurs then the penalty does not occur. sent9: the humanness does not occur. sent10: that the artificialness occurs and the arseniousness happens brings about that the compoundness happens. sent11: the syncreticness happens if not the demonstration but the hammerlock occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demonstration happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: both the hammerlock and the demonstration happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the serendipity does not occur is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent9 -> int3: both the non-artificialness and the arseniousness occurs.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: that the compound occurs hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the serendipity does not occur but the compound occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the syncreticness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the demonstration happens the serendipity does not occur but the compound happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the artificialness does not occur. sent2: that the artificialness does not occur is caused by the nonhumanness. sent3: that both the non-artificialness and the arseniousness occurs triggers that the compoundness occurs. sent4: the hammerlock occurs. sent5: if the humanness does not occur then not the artificialness but the arseniousness occurs. sent6: that the nagging by-product happens is not false. sent7: if both the hammerlock and the demonstration occurs then the fact that the serendipity does not occur is true. sent8: if the archaeologicalness and the deactivation occurs then the penalty does not occur. sent9: the humanness does not occur. sent10: that the artificialness occurs and the arseniousness happens brings about that the compoundness happens. sent11: the syncreticness happens if not the demonstration but the hammerlock occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demonstration happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: both the hammerlock and the demonstration happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the serendipity does not occur is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent9 -> int3: both the non-artificialness and the arseniousness occurs.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: that the compound occurs hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the serendipity does not occur but the compound occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__