the fact that the eolith is not irreconcilable but it is a introversion is not true.
sent1: the eolith is a baya and it is a musketeer. sent2: something is a baya if that it is both not a baya and not irreconcilable is not true. sent3: if something clamors Argus it is irreconcilable. sent4: everything either clamors Argus or is a vow or both. sent5: if the fact that something is a introversion and is not a kind of a musketeer is not right then it is a musketeer. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a Greenpeace and it is a Reaper does not hold. sent7: something is a introversion if it is a baya. sent8: if that the everyman is not a baya is correct that the eolith is not irreconcilable but it is a introversion is incorrect. sent9: if the eolith clamors scouting then the fact that it does not clamor Argus is not false. sent10: if something clamors Argus and is not a vow then it is a musketeer. sent11: that something is a introversion and is not a kind of a musketeer does not hold if it is a kind of a baya. sent12: something is not irreconcilable if it does clamor Argus. sent13: the eolith is not irreconcilable if it does vow.
sent1 -> int1: the eolith is a kind of a baya.; sent7 -> int2: the eolith is a introversion if it is a baya.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eolith is a introversion.; sent4 -> int4: either the eolith does clamor Argus or it is a vow or both.; sent12 -> int5: the eolith is not irreconcilable if it does clamor Argus.; int4 & int5 & sent13 -> int6: the eolith is not irreconcilable.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the eolith is non-irreconcilable a introversion does not hold.
sent10 -> int7: the blueprint is a musketeer if it does clamor Argus and does not vow.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the eolith is not irreconcilable but it is a introversion is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the eolith is a baya and it is a musketeer. sent2: something is a baya if that it is both not a baya and not irreconcilable is not true. sent3: if something clamors Argus it is irreconcilable. sent4: everything either clamors Argus or is a vow or both. sent5: if the fact that something is a introversion and is not a kind of a musketeer is not right then it is a musketeer. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a Greenpeace and it is a Reaper does not hold. sent7: something is a introversion if it is a baya. sent8: if that the everyman is not a baya is correct that the eolith is not irreconcilable but it is a introversion is incorrect. sent9: if the eolith clamors scouting then the fact that it does not clamor Argus is not false. sent10: if something clamors Argus and is not a vow then it is a musketeer. sent11: that something is a introversion and is not a kind of a musketeer does not hold if it is a kind of a baya. sent12: something is not irreconcilable if it does clamor Argus. sent13: the eolith is not irreconcilable if it does vow. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the eolith is a kind of a baya.; sent7 -> int2: the eolith is a introversion if it is a baya.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eolith is a introversion.; sent4 -> int4: either the eolith does clamor Argus or it is a vow or both.; sent12 -> int5: the eolith is not irreconcilable if it does clamor Argus.; int4 & int5 & sent13 -> int6: the eolith is not irreconcilable.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__