the fact that the chamomile is not a kind of a Frenchman is right.
sent1: if something is not a sabbatia and is basilican then it is not a kind of a derringer. sent2: if the haze is a puffball and does not bargain wireless then it is a kind of a Mayaca. sent3: if something is a Maundy it is a derringer. sent4: something is not a sabbatia but it is basilican if that it is a spaniel is incorrect. sent5: if the fact that something is a portable but it is not a hyperventilation is incorrect it is a Maundy. sent6: something that is a derringer or is not basilican or both is not a Frenchman. sent7: the chamomile is a sabbatia but it does not bargain Red. sent8: if that the calliope does not bargain Red and it is not a Maundy is wrong then the silicon is not a kind of a Frenchman. sent9: if the chamomile is not unportable but it is not a kind of a hyperventilation it does bargain Red.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chamomile is both not unportable and not a hyperventilation.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the chamomile bargains Red hold.; sent7 -> int2: the chamomile does not bargain Red.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the chamomile is a kind of a portable but it is not a kind of a hyperventilation is not false is incorrect.; sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the fact that the chamomile is a kind of a portable that is not a hyperventilation is not false does not hold it is a Maundy.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chamomile is a Maundy.; sent3 -> int7: if the chamomile is a kind of a Maundy it is a kind of a derringer.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the chamomile is a derringer.; int8 -> int9: either the chamomile is a derringer or it is non-basilican or both.; sent6 -> int10: the chamomile is not a Frenchman if it is a derringer or it is not basilican or both.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the chamomile is a Frenchman.
sent1 -> int11: if the fact that the calliope is not a kind of a sabbatia but it is basilican is right it is not a kind of a derringer.; sent4 -> int12: the esker is not a kind of a sabbatia but it is basilican if it is not a spaniel.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chamomile is not a kind of a Frenchman is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a sabbatia and is basilican then it is not a kind of a derringer. sent2: if the haze is a puffball and does not bargain wireless then it is a kind of a Mayaca. sent3: if something is a Maundy it is a derringer. sent4: something is not a sabbatia but it is basilican if that it is a spaniel is incorrect. sent5: if the fact that something is a portable but it is not a hyperventilation is incorrect it is a Maundy. sent6: something that is a derringer or is not basilican or both is not a Frenchman. sent7: the chamomile is a sabbatia but it does not bargain Red. sent8: if that the calliope does not bargain Red and it is not a Maundy is wrong then the silicon is not a kind of a Frenchman. sent9: if the chamomile is not unportable but it is not a kind of a hyperventilation it does bargain Red. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chamomile is both not unportable and not a hyperventilation.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the chamomile bargains Red hold.; sent7 -> int2: the chamomile does not bargain Red.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the chamomile is a kind of a portable but it is not a kind of a hyperventilation is not false is incorrect.; sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the fact that the chamomile is a kind of a portable that is not a hyperventilation is not false does not hold it is a Maundy.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chamomile is a Maundy.; sent3 -> int7: if the chamomile is a kind of a Maundy it is a kind of a derringer.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the chamomile is a derringer.; int8 -> int9: either the chamomile is a derringer or it is non-basilican or both.; sent6 -> int10: the chamomile is not a Frenchman if it is a derringer or it is not basilican or both.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__