that the business does not occur and the misdirection occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the business does not occur if the DO occurs. sent2: the drinking happens. sent3: if the drink occurs then that the misdirection occurs is right. sent4: the reddening iron results in the misuse. sent5: the inclusion or the DO or both causes that the business does not occur. sent6: the unstableness happens and/or the smoothedness happens. sent7: if the inclusion does not occur that the fact that the business does not occur but the misdirection occurs is not wrong is not correct. sent8: the inclusion happens.
sent8 -> int1: the inclusion occurs and/or the DO occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the business does not occur.; sent3 & sent2 -> int3: the misdirection occurs.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
that not the business but the misdirection happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the business does not occur and the misdirection occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the business does not occur if the DO occurs. sent2: the drinking happens. sent3: if the drink occurs then that the misdirection occurs is right. sent4: the reddening iron results in the misuse. sent5: the inclusion or the DO or both causes that the business does not occur. sent6: the unstableness happens and/or the smoothedness happens. sent7: if the inclusion does not occur that the fact that the business does not occur but the misdirection occurs is not wrong is not correct. sent8: the inclusion happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the inclusion occurs and/or the DO occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the business does not occur.; sent3 & sent2 -> int3: the misdirection occurs.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__