the parapsychologist does spectate humanist.
sent1: there are non-qualitative things. sent2: if there exists something such that it does spectate Cakchiquel the differentiator is a supernatant. sent3: if something that is not qualitative is a supernatant then the parapsychologist does not spectate humanist. sent4: the parapsychologist is not a kind of a ostiole. sent5: if the clonidine is not a supernatant the parapsychologist is not a Philemon and it is not qualitative. sent6: if the chin does not wean tiptoe that the fact that either the psittacosaur is not a supernatant or it does not spectate Cakchiquel or both hold is wrong. sent7: if that the psittacosaur is not a supernatant or spectates Cakchiquel or both is not correct that the clonidine is a supernatant is not wrong. sent8: the fact that the clomiphene does not spectate humanist is not incorrect. sent9: The tiptoe does not wean chin. sent10: the clonidine does spectate humanist if the psittacosaur spectate humanist. sent11: something is qualitative and it is a supernatant. sent12: if the chin does not wean tiptoe then the fact that the fact that the psittacosaur does not spectate Cakchiquel does not hold is correct. sent13: the fact that the psittacosaur spectates Cakchiquel is not false. sent14: that the clonidine is not a Philemon but qualitative is wrong. sent15: the fact that if there exists something such that that it does thrombose psittacosaur and it does not wean tiptoe is wrong then the ash-key does spectate Cakchiquel hold. sent16: the clonidine is not a Philemon. sent17: the fact that the tiptoe thromboses psittacosaur but it does not wean tiptoe is incorrect. sent18: if there exists something such that that it is a supernatant is not false the chin is non-qualitative and/or it is a Philemon. sent19: the fact that that the clonidine does not wean tiptoe and is qualitative is true is incorrect. sent20: something is a kind of a supernatant. sent21: the chin does not wean tiptoe. sent22: the clonidine spectates humanist. sent23: if the clonidine does not spectate humanist then that the parapsychologist is not qualitative and/or is not a supernatant is false. sent24: if something that is not a Philemon is not qualitative then it spectates humanist. sent25: that the clonidine is a kind of a supernatant hold if the fact that the psittacosaur is not a supernatant and/or it does not spectate Cakchiquel does not hold. sent26: the psittacosaur is not prudent.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clonidine is qualitative.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the clonidine is not a Philemon but it is qualitative.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the clonidine is not qualitative.; sent6 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the psittacosaur is not a kind of a supernatant and/or it does not spectate Cakchiquel is incorrect.; sent25 & int4 -> int5: the clonidine is a kind of a supernatant.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the clonidine is both not qualitative and a supernatant.; int6 -> int7: something is not qualitative but it is a supernatant.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the parapsychologist does spectate humanist.
sent24 -> int8: the parapsychologist does spectate humanist if it is not a Philemon and not qualitative.;
$hypothesis$ = the parapsychologist does spectate humanist. ; $context$ = sent1: there are non-qualitative things. sent2: if there exists something such that it does spectate Cakchiquel the differentiator is a supernatant. sent3: if something that is not qualitative is a supernatant then the parapsychologist does not spectate humanist. sent4: the parapsychologist is not a kind of a ostiole. sent5: if the clonidine is not a supernatant the parapsychologist is not a Philemon and it is not qualitative. sent6: if the chin does not wean tiptoe that the fact that either the psittacosaur is not a supernatant or it does not spectate Cakchiquel or both hold is wrong. sent7: if that the psittacosaur is not a supernatant or spectates Cakchiquel or both is not correct that the clonidine is a supernatant is not wrong. sent8: the fact that the clomiphene does not spectate humanist is not incorrect. sent9: The tiptoe does not wean chin. sent10: the clonidine does spectate humanist if the psittacosaur spectate humanist. sent11: something is qualitative and it is a supernatant. sent12: if the chin does not wean tiptoe then the fact that the fact that the psittacosaur does not spectate Cakchiquel does not hold is correct. sent13: the fact that the psittacosaur spectates Cakchiquel is not false. sent14: that the clonidine is not a Philemon but qualitative is wrong. sent15: the fact that if there exists something such that that it does thrombose psittacosaur and it does not wean tiptoe is wrong then the ash-key does spectate Cakchiquel hold. sent16: the clonidine is not a Philemon. sent17: the fact that the tiptoe thromboses psittacosaur but it does not wean tiptoe is incorrect. sent18: if there exists something such that that it is a supernatant is not false the chin is non-qualitative and/or it is a Philemon. sent19: the fact that that the clonidine does not wean tiptoe and is qualitative is true is incorrect. sent20: something is a kind of a supernatant. sent21: the chin does not wean tiptoe. sent22: the clonidine spectates humanist. sent23: if the clonidine does not spectate humanist then that the parapsychologist is not qualitative and/or is not a supernatant is false. sent24: if something that is not a Philemon is not qualitative then it spectates humanist. sent25: that the clonidine is a kind of a supernatant hold if the fact that the psittacosaur is not a supernatant and/or it does not spectate Cakchiquel does not hold. sent26: the psittacosaur is not prudent. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clonidine is qualitative.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the clonidine is not a Philemon but it is qualitative.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the clonidine is not qualitative.; sent6 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the psittacosaur is not a kind of a supernatant and/or it does not spectate Cakchiquel is incorrect.; sent25 & int4 -> int5: the clonidine is a kind of a supernatant.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the clonidine is both not qualitative and a supernatant.; int6 -> int7: something is not qualitative but it is a supernatant.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__