the bed-and-breakfast does not undercut uniformity.
sent1: the vesiculation is not a black. sent2: if the vesiculation is not a black then it is not bottomless. sent3: that the dextrin is overt and a fender-bender does not hold. sent4: the fact that the amazon is non-loamless thing that does not maraud is not true if the hydromel does crenel. sent5: if the carcase is a kind of a innocense and it is a kind of a tongueflower it is not Sicilian. sent6: the bed-and-breakfast is a Sicilian if the fact that the dextrin is a Sicilian hold. sent7: if the carcase is not a kind of a Sicilian then that the dextrin is overt and not a fender-bender does not hold. sent8: the carcase is not a tongueflower. sent9: the storage is a fender-bender if the corvette does maraud. sent10: if the carcase does not undercut uniformity that the bed-and-breakfast is a tongueflower but it is not a Sicilian is wrong. sent11: something hunts if that it is overt and it is not a kind of a fender-bender is wrong. sent12: something that is both a innocense and not a tongueflower is not Sicilian. sent13: the carcase is diffuse. sent14: if the fact that the carcase does diffuse hold it is a innocense and it is not a tongueflower. sent15: that something is not a kind of a hunted and it is not overt does not hold if the fact that it is a fender-bender is correct. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it does not undercut bottlecap and does undercut storage is not true. sent17: if something is both Sicilian and overt then it does not undercut uniformity. sent18: the corvette does maraud if the fact that the amazon is a kind of non-loamless thing that does not maraud is incorrect. sent19: that if the storage is a fender-bender then the bed-and-breakfast is a kind of a fender-bender is right. sent20: the dextrin is diffuse and a Sicilian if the vesiculation is not bottomless. sent21: if the dextrin does hunt the bed-and-breakfast undercuts uniformity. sent22: if the dextrin is a fender-bender then it is a kind of a hunted.
sent12 -> int1: if the carcase is a innocense but it is not a tongueflower it is not a Sicilian.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: the carcase is a innocense and is not a tongueflower.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the carcase is not a kind of a Sicilian.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the dextrin is overt thing that is not a kind of a fender-bender is incorrect.; sent11 -> int5: if the fact that the dextrin is overt and is not a fender-bender is false then it does hunt.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the dextrin hunts is true.; int6 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the bed-and-breakfast does not undercut uniformity.
sent17 -> int7: if the bed-and-breakfast is a Sicilian that is overt it does not undercut uniformity.; sent2 & sent1 -> int8: the vesiculation is not bottomless.; sent20 & int8 -> int9: the dextrin does diffuse and it is a Sicilian.; int9 -> int10: the dextrin is a Sicilian.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the bed-and-breakfast is a Sicilian.; sent15 -> int12: the fact that the bed-and-breakfast is both not a hunted and not overt does not hold if it is a fender-bender.;
$hypothesis$ = the bed-and-breakfast does not undercut uniformity. ; $context$ = sent1: the vesiculation is not a black. sent2: if the vesiculation is not a black then it is not bottomless. sent3: that the dextrin is overt and a fender-bender does not hold. sent4: the fact that the amazon is non-loamless thing that does not maraud is not true if the hydromel does crenel. sent5: if the carcase is a kind of a innocense and it is a kind of a tongueflower it is not Sicilian. sent6: the bed-and-breakfast is a Sicilian if the fact that the dextrin is a Sicilian hold. sent7: if the carcase is not a kind of a Sicilian then that the dextrin is overt and not a fender-bender does not hold. sent8: the carcase is not a tongueflower. sent9: the storage is a fender-bender if the corvette does maraud. sent10: if the carcase does not undercut uniformity that the bed-and-breakfast is a tongueflower but it is not a Sicilian is wrong. sent11: something hunts if that it is overt and it is not a kind of a fender-bender is wrong. sent12: something that is both a innocense and not a tongueflower is not Sicilian. sent13: the carcase is diffuse. sent14: if the fact that the carcase does diffuse hold it is a innocense and it is not a tongueflower. sent15: that something is not a kind of a hunted and it is not overt does not hold if the fact that it is a fender-bender is correct. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it does not undercut bottlecap and does undercut storage is not true. sent17: if something is both Sicilian and overt then it does not undercut uniformity. sent18: the corvette does maraud if the fact that the amazon is a kind of non-loamless thing that does not maraud is incorrect. sent19: that if the storage is a fender-bender then the bed-and-breakfast is a kind of a fender-bender is right. sent20: the dextrin is diffuse and a Sicilian if the vesiculation is not bottomless. sent21: if the dextrin does hunt the bed-and-breakfast undercuts uniformity. sent22: if the dextrin is a fender-bender then it is a kind of a hunted. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the carcase is a innocense but it is not a tongueflower it is not a Sicilian.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: the carcase is a innocense and is not a tongueflower.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the carcase is not a kind of a Sicilian.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the dextrin is overt thing that is not a kind of a fender-bender is incorrect.; sent11 -> int5: if the fact that the dextrin is overt and is not a fender-bender is false then it does hunt.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the dextrin hunts is true.; int6 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__