the taffy is hot.
sent1: the taffy is hot if the petter does geminate comb-out. sent2: the fleabag temporizes if the flyway is not a revoke and is fundamentalist. sent3: the petter geminates comb-out if the sawhorse is not a revoke but isotropic. sent4: the fact that the taffy geminates comb-out is right. sent5: if the sawhorse does glare documented then it is not a fundamentalist. sent6: the flyway is not matriarchal. sent7: the strap is Singaporean. sent8: the taffy is not isotropic and is not polytheistic. sent9: the sawhorse glares documented if a hot thing does geminate comb-out. sent10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Munchener. sent11: something is matriarchal. sent12: if something concocts sternutator then it does glare documented. sent13: if there is something such that it is a Munchener the flyway is not non-fundamentalist. sent14: the petter geminates comb-out if that the sawhorse is a revoke but it is not isotropic hold. sent15: the sawhorse is hot. sent16: something is not a revoke and it is not isotropic if it glares documented. sent17: the taffy is not a revoke and is not hot if it is isotropic. sent18: the petter does geminate comb-out if the sawhorse is not a revoke and it is not isotropic. sent19: if the fleabag does temporize the sawhorse concocts sternutator. sent20: if the taffy is hot then it does not concoct sternutator. sent21: if there is something such that it is isotropic and fundamentalist then the fact that the sawhorse does temporize is true. sent22: if the fact that the flyway is not hot and is a kind of a fundamentalist is not right the fact that the taffy is hot hold. sent23: the sawhorse is not non-infernal if the flyway does concoct sternutator. sent24: the fact that the flyway is an infernal is right if something is matriarchal. sent25: there exists something such that it is a kind of an exponential. sent26: the flyway temporizes if something is a kind of an infernal. sent27: the petter does not temporize and does not geminate comb-out if it is hot. sent28: there exists something such that it is photographic. sent29: if the flyway is not fundamentalist and not isotropic the sawhorse is a revoke.
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the flyway is fundamentalist.; sent11 & sent24 -> int2: the flyway is a kind of an infernal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flyway is a fundamentalist and is an infernal.; int3 -> int4: there are fundamentalist and infernal things.; sent12 -> int5: if the sawhorse does concoct sternutator then it does glare documented.; sent16 -> int6: the fact that if the sawhorse does glare documented the sawhorse does not revoke and it is not isotropic is not false.;
that the taffy is not hot is true.
$hypothesis$ = the taffy is hot. ; $context$ = sent1: the taffy is hot if the petter does geminate comb-out. sent2: the fleabag temporizes if the flyway is not a revoke and is fundamentalist. sent3: the petter geminates comb-out if the sawhorse is not a revoke but isotropic. sent4: the fact that the taffy geminates comb-out is right. sent5: if the sawhorse does glare documented then it is not a fundamentalist. sent6: the flyway is not matriarchal. sent7: the strap is Singaporean. sent8: the taffy is not isotropic and is not polytheistic. sent9: the sawhorse glares documented if a hot thing does geminate comb-out. sent10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Munchener. sent11: something is matriarchal. sent12: if something concocts sternutator then it does glare documented. sent13: if there is something such that it is a Munchener the flyway is not non-fundamentalist. sent14: the petter geminates comb-out if that the sawhorse is a revoke but it is not isotropic hold. sent15: the sawhorse is hot. sent16: something is not a revoke and it is not isotropic if it glares documented. sent17: the taffy is not a revoke and is not hot if it is isotropic. sent18: the petter does geminate comb-out if the sawhorse is not a revoke and it is not isotropic. sent19: if the fleabag does temporize the sawhorse concocts sternutator. sent20: if the taffy is hot then it does not concoct sternutator. sent21: if there is something such that it is isotropic and fundamentalist then the fact that the sawhorse does temporize is true. sent22: if the fact that the flyway is not hot and is a kind of a fundamentalist is not right the fact that the taffy is hot hold. sent23: the sawhorse is not non-infernal if the flyway does concoct sternutator. sent24: the fact that the flyway is an infernal is right if something is matriarchal. sent25: there exists something such that it is a kind of an exponential. sent26: the flyway temporizes if something is a kind of an infernal. sent27: the petter does not temporize and does not geminate comb-out if it is hot. sent28: there exists something such that it is photographic. sent29: if the flyway is not fundamentalist and not isotropic the sawhorse is a revoke. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the flyway is fundamentalist.; sent11 & sent24 -> int2: the flyway is a kind of an infernal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flyway is a fundamentalist and is an infernal.; int3 -> int4: there are fundamentalist and infernal things.; sent12 -> int5: if the sawhorse does concoct sternutator then it does glare documented.; sent16 -> int6: the fact that if the sawhorse does glare documented the sawhorse does not revoke and it is not isotropic is not false.; __UNKNOWN__