that the alpinist is not a heterocyclic is not wrong.
sent1: the Tatar promises latchet. sent2: that the alpinist is both immodest and not an aphrodisiac is false. sent3: that the fact that the alpinist is a kind of a heterocyclic that does not holystone is correct is false. sent4: the fact that if something is not asclepiadaceous it is not a heterocyclic is right. sent5: the Tatar is not vegetal if it is a Plotinus. sent6: if that the Tatar is not Australian and it is not industrial is false it does not jam Galway. sent7: the fact that the alpinist does not blanket rogation and is not vegetal does not hold. sent8: the Tatar is not a heterocyclic if the alpinist does holystone. sent9: if something is not a kind of a teredo that it is not undrinkable and is not a courage does not hold. sent10: if the Tatar is a heterocyclic it is not a holystone. sent11: the Tatar is not vegetal if the fact that it is not Caucasian and it is not a Plotinus is not correct. sent12: if the alpinist is vegetal the fact that the Tatar is not a heterocyclic hold. sent13: the fact that the fact that the ambulance does not promise bedded and it is not a Plotinus is wrong is not incorrect. sent14: that the Swede is Caucasian but it is not an aphrodisiac is wrong. sent15: the alpinist is not a kind of a holystone if the Tatar is a Plotinus. sent16: the fact that the Tatar is not a kind of a Caucasian and it is not a Plotinus is wrong. sent17: if that the Tatar is a holystone but not vegetal is false then the alpinist is a heterocyclic. sent18: if something is a kind of a holystone then it is not industrial and it is not a cyber-terrorism. sent19: the fact that the fact that the Tatar is a kind of a heterocyclic but it is not a kind of a holystone is not incorrect is wrong. sent20: if the mineral is not asclepiadaceous then the fact that the Tatar is both a holystone and not vegetal is not right. sent21: if the alpinist is a kind of a Australian it is not a Caucasian. sent22: that the alpinist is not a heterocyclic is right if the Tatar does holystone. sent23: the Tatar is both not an ice and not a heterocyclic.
sent11 & sent16 -> int1: the Tatar is not vegetal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tatar is not a holystone.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Tatar is non-vegetal thing that is not a holystone.;
the alpinist is a heterocyclic.
sent9 -> int3: the fact that the gadolinium is not undrinkable and it is not a courage does not hold if it is not a teredo.;
$hypothesis$ = that the alpinist is not a heterocyclic is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tatar promises latchet. sent2: that the alpinist is both immodest and not an aphrodisiac is false. sent3: that the fact that the alpinist is a kind of a heterocyclic that does not holystone is correct is false. sent4: the fact that if something is not asclepiadaceous it is not a heterocyclic is right. sent5: the Tatar is not vegetal if it is a Plotinus. sent6: if that the Tatar is not Australian and it is not industrial is false it does not jam Galway. sent7: the fact that the alpinist does not blanket rogation and is not vegetal does not hold. sent8: the Tatar is not a heterocyclic if the alpinist does holystone. sent9: if something is not a kind of a teredo that it is not undrinkable and is not a courage does not hold. sent10: if the Tatar is a heterocyclic it is not a holystone. sent11: the Tatar is not vegetal if the fact that it is not Caucasian and it is not a Plotinus is not correct. sent12: if the alpinist is vegetal the fact that the Tatar is not a heterocyclic hold. sent13: the fact that the fact that the ambulance does not promise bedded and it is not a Plotinus is wrong is not incorrect. sent14: that the Swede is Caucasian but it is not an aphrodisiac is wrong. sent15: the alpinist is not a kind of a holystone if the Tatar is a Plotinus. sent16: the fact that the Tatar is not a kind of a Caucasian and it is not a Plotinus is wrong. sent17: if that the Tatar is a holystone but not vegetal is false then the alpinist is a heterocyclic. sent18: if something is a kind of a holystone then it is not industrial and it is not a cyber-terrorism. sent19: the fact that the fact that the Tatar is a kind of a heterocyclic but it is not a kind of a holystone is not incorrect is wrong. sent20: if the mineral is not asclepiadaceous then the fact that the Tatar is both a holystone and not vegetal is not right. sent21: if the alpinist is a kind of a Australian it is not a Caucasian. sent22: that the alpinist is not a heterocyclic is right if the Tatar does holystone. sent23: the Tatar is both not an ice and not a heterocyclic. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent16 -> int1: the Tatar is not vegetal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tatar is not a holystone.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Tatar is non-vegetal thing that is not a holystone.; __UNKNOWN__