the capon is confident or it dissipates or both.
sent1: everything does not refrain suppressant. sent2: that either the capon is confident or it does dissipate or both does not hold if the myxovirus is not a prognathism. sent3: if something is lumbosacral then it does not assemble acculturation and is a counterfeit. sent4: if something gorges oxyphenbutazone then it is lumbosacral. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that either it is conspicuous or it assembles allowance or both is false then the myxovirus assembles stay-at-home. sent6: everything does not gorge Juarez and is high-tech. sent7: if the handhold does not assemble acculturation and is counterfeit then the lignite is a kind of a counterfeit. sent8: the peridium is confident if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-confident thing that gorges Juarez does not hold. sent9: the fact that the halo is not confident but it does gorge Juarez is incorrect if the Junkers is a kind of a knock. sent10: the Junkers is a knock if the lignite is a kind of a counterfeit. sent11: something does dissipate if it is confident and/or not high-tech. sent12: that if something dissipates then it is an animist is right. sent13: if the fact that something is not a prognathism is correct it is not conspicuous. sent14: if the myxovirus assembles stay-at-home then it is not non-animist. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an animist. sent16: the myxovirus is high-tech. sent17: the city is confident and/or it is not high-tech if there is something such that it is confident. sent18: the capon does dissipate if the fact that it is a kind of a prognathism is true. sent19: if the myxovirus is not a prognathism the fact that the antidepressant does gorge cirque and/or it assembles allowance is not correct. sent20: that something is conspicuous or assembles allowance or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a prognathism. sent21: something is not a kentan and does not assemble handhold if it does not refrain suppressant. sent22: if something does not gorge Juarez but it is not non-high-tech then it is phalangeal. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not a kentan and does not assemble handhold then that the handhold gorges oxyphenbutazone is right.
sent20 -> int1: the fact that the capon is conspicuous and/or it assembles allowance does not hold if it is not a kind of a prognathism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the capon is not a prognathism.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the capon is conspicuous or it does assemble allowance or both is not true.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that either it is conspicuous or it does assemble allowance or both does not hold.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the myxovirus does assemble stay-at-home.; sent22 -> int5: if the myxovirus does not gorge Juarez and is high-tech then it is phalangeal.; sent6 -> int6: the myxovirus does not gorge Juarez and is not non-high-tech.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the myxovirus is phalangeal.; int7 -> int8: either the myxovirus is not an animist or it is phalangeal or both.;
that the antidepressant gorges cirque and/or it does assemble allowance is not right.
sent12 -> int9: if the city dissipates it is a kind of an animist.; sent3 -> int10: if the handhold is lumbosacral it does not assemble acculturation and it is a counterfeit.; sent4 -> int11: the handhold is lumbosacral if the fact that it does not gorge oxyphenbutazone is wrong.; sent21 -> int12: if the greeter does not refrain suppressant it is not a kind of a kentan and it does not assemble handhold.; sent1 -> int13: the greeter does not refrain suppressant.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the greeter is not a kentan and does not assemble handhold.; int14 -> int15: everything is not a kind of a kentan and it does not assemble handhold.; int15 -> int16: the cirque is not a kentan and it does not assemble handhold.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is not a kentan and it does not assemble handhold.; sent23 & int17 -> int18: the handhold gorges oxyphenbutazone.; int11 & int18 -> int19: the handhold is lumbosacral.; int10 & int19 -> int20: the handhold does not assemble acculturation and is a kind of a counterfeit.; int20 & sent7 -> int21: the lignite is a counterfeit.; int21 & sent10 -> int22: the Junkers is a knock.; sent9 & int22 -> int23: that the halo is not confident and does gorge Juarez is not correct.; int23 -> int24: there is something such that the fact that it is not confident and it gorges Juarez is not right.; int24 & sent8 -> int25: the peridium is confident.; int25 -> int26: that something is confident hold.; sent17 & int26 -> int27: the city is confident and/or it is not high-tech.; sent11 -> int28: the city dissipates if it is confident or not high-tech or both.; int27 & int28 -> int29: the city does dissipate.; int9 & int29 -> int30: the city is animist.;
$hypothesis$ = the capon is confident or it dissipates or both. ; $context$ = sent1: everything does not refrain suppressant. sent2: that either the capon is confident or it does dissipate or both does not hold if the myxovirus is not a prognathism. sent3: if something is lumbosacral then it does not assemble acculturation and is a counterfeit. sent4: if something gorges oxyphenbutazone then it is lumbosacral. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that either it is conspicuous or it assembles allowance or both is false then the myxovirus assembles stay-at-home. sent6: everything does not gorge Juarez and is high-tech. sent7: if the handhold does not assemble acculturation and is counterfeit then the lignite is a kind of a counterfeit. sent8: the peridium is confident if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-confident thing that gorges Juarez does not hold. sent9: the fact that the halo is not confident but it does gorge Juarez is incorrect if the Junkers is a kind of a knock. sent10: the Junkers is a knock if the lignite is a kind of a counterfeit. sent11: something does dissipate if it is confident and/or not high-tech. sent12: that if something dissipates then it is an animist is right. sent13: if the fact that something is not a prognathism is correct it is not conspicuous. sent14: if the myxovirus assembles stay-at-home then it is not non-animist. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an animist. sent16: the myxovirus is high-tech. sent17: the city is confident and/or it is not high-tech if there is something such that it is confident. sent18: the capon does dissipate if the fact that it is a kind of a prognathism is true. sent19: if the myxovirus is not a prognathism the fact that the antidepressant does gorge cirque and/or it assembles allowance is not correct. sent20: that something is conspicuous or assembles allowance or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a prognathism. sent21: something is not a kentan and does not assemble handhold if it does not refrain suppressant. sent22: if something does not gorge Juarez but it is not non-high-tech then it is phalangeal. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not a kentan and does not assemble handhold then that the handhold gorges oxyphenbutazone is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the fact that the capon is conspicuous and/or it assembles allowance does not hold if it is not a kind of a prognathism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the capon is not a prognathism.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the capon is conspicuous or it does assemble allowance or both is not true.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that either it is conspicuous or it does assemble allowance or both does not hold.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the myxovirus does assemble stay-at-home.; sent22 -> int5: if the myxovirus does not gorge Juarez and is high-tech then it is phalangeal.; sent6 -> int6: the myxovirus does not gorge Juarez and is not non-high-tech.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the myxovirus is phalangeal.; int7 -> int8: either the myxovirus is not an animist or it is phalangeal or both.; __UNKNOWN__