the trefoil is not a streaker.
sent1: The signal-to-noise permits smokestack. sent2: the smokestack is not a kind of a go if that the trefoil is not incommutable and it is not a kind of a streaker hold. sent3: the trefoil is not a fidget if there is something such that it does intimate. sent4: there is nothing such that it is not nonexploratory and does not permit signal-to-noise. sent5: if the coldness does not fidget then the smokestack does not fidget. sent6: if there exists something such that that it does not intimate and it does not stigmatize Cousteau is incorrect then that the trefoil is a fidget is incorrect. sent7: the trefoil is not a kind of a streaker if that the smokestack is both a streaker and not incommutable is not right. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is nonexploratory and does not stigmatize dun is incorrect. sent9: if the Evangelist is not non-go then the coldness does not fidget. sent10: if the smokestack does permit signal-to-noise it goes and it is not nonexploratory. sent11: something that does not fidget is not incommutable. sent12: the smokestack permits signal-to-noise. sent13: if something goes then the fact that it fidgets and it is not incommutable is wrong. sent14: if something is not a kind of a streaker then it is not nonexploratory. sent15: there is something such that that it does not intimate and stigmatizes Cousteau is incorrect. sent16: the trefoil does bumble teacher. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it does not intimate and does not stigmatize Cousteau is wrong. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it does intimate and it does not stigmatize Cousteau is not correct.
sent17 & sent6 -> int1: the trefoil is not a fidget.; sent11 -> int2: if the trefoil is not a fidget then it is not incommutable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trefoil is not incommutable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trefoil is not a streaker.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the trefoil is not incommutable and it is not a kind of a streaker.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the smokestack is not go.; sent10 & sent12 -> int6: the smokestack does go but it is not nonexploratory.; int6 -> int7: the smokestack is a go.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the proprioceptor is not a streaker.
sent13 -> int9: the fact that the trefoil is a fidget but it is not incommutable is incorrect if it goes.; sent4 -> int10: that the smokestack is not nonexploratory and it does not permit signal-to-noise does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not nonexploratory and it does not permit signal-to-noise is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the trefoil is not a streaker. ; $context$ = sent1: The signal-to-noise permits smokestack. sent2: the smokestack is not a kind of a go if that the trefoil is not incommutable and it is not a kind of a streaker hold. sent3: the trefoil is not a fidget if there is something such that it does intimate. sent4: there is nothing such that it is not nonexploratory and does not permit signal-to-noise. sent5: if the coldness does not fidget then the smokestack does not fidget. sent6: if there exists something such that that it does not intimate and it does not stigmatize Cousteau is incorrect then that the trefoil is a fidget is incorrect. sent7: the trefoil is not a kind of a streaker if that the smokestack is both a streaker and not incommutable is not right. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is nonexploratory and does not stigmatize dun is incorrect. sent9: if the Evangelist is not non-go then the coldness does not fidget. sent10: if the smokestack does permit signal-to-noise it goes and it is not nonexploratory. sent11: something that does not fidget is not incommutable. sent12: the smokestack permits signal-to-noise. sent13: if something goes then the fact that it fidgets and it is not incommutable is wrong. sent14: if something is not a kind of a streaker then it is not nonexploratory. sent15: there is something such that that it does not intimate and stigmatizes Cousteau is incorrect. sent16: the trefoil does bumble teacher. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it does not intimate and does not stigmatize Cousteau is wrong. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it does intimate and it does not stigmatize Cousteau is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent6 -> int1: the trefoil is not a fidget.; sent11 -> int2: if the trefoil is not a fidget then it is not incommutable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trefoil is not incommutable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trefoil is not a streaker.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the trefoil is not incommutable and it is not a kind of a streaker.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the smokestack is not go.; sent10 & sent12 -> int6: the smokestack does go but it is not nonexploratory.; int6 -> int7: the smokestack is a go.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__