the unretentiveness does not occur if the fact that the overreaching shop does not occur is not incorrect.
sent1: if that the overreaching shop does not occur and the unretentiveness occurs is not true then the impelling technetium does not occur. sent2: the unretentiveness does not occur if that the overreaching shop occurs is not incorrect. sent3: that the sedation does not occur but the impelling pathway occurs is not true if the photosyntheticness occurs. sent4: the anoxemicness happens. sent5: the impelling pathway does not occur if that not the sedation but the impelling pathway happens is not right. sent6: the Zephyr occurs and the overreaching stand-in happens if the origin does not occur. sent7: the origin does not occur if the fact that not the formalism but the origin happens is incorrect. sent8: if the turning does not occur that the fact that the non-dissuasiveness and the incompetentness happens is not right is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the overreaching shop does not occur but the unretentiveness happens is not true if the fictileness happens. sent10: the adjoining does not occur. sent11: the photosyntheticness occurs and the disembarrassment happens if the biogeographicness does not occur. sent12: if that the overreaching shop does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the unretentiveness occurs hold. sent13: the biogeographicness does not occur if that the dissuasiveness does not occur and the competentness does not occur is not correct. sent14: that the impelling pathway does not occur causes that both the fictileness and the TAT occurs. sent15: if the Zephyr occurs that the shunning promycelium does not occur and the emission does not occur is not right. sent16: the turning does not occur if the fact that that the shunning promycelium does not occur and the emission does not occur is correct is not correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unretentiveness happens.;
the impelling technetium does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the unretentiveness does not occur if the fact that the overreaching shop does not occur is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the overreaching shop does not occur and the unretentiveness occurs is not true then the impelling technetium does not occur. sent2: the unretentiveness does not occur if that the overreaching shop occurs is not incorrect. sent3: that the sedation does not occur but the impelling pathway occurs is not true if the photosyntheticness occurs. sent4: the anoxemicness happens. sent5: the impelling pathway does not occur if that not the sedation but the impelling pathway happens is not right. sent6: the Zephyr occurs and the overreaching stand-in happens if the origin does not occur. sent7: the origin does not occur if the fact that not the formalism but the origin happens is incorrect. sent8: if the turning does not occur that the fact that the non-dissuasiveness and the incompetentness happens is not right is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the overreaching shop does not occur but the unretentiveness happens is not true if the fictileness happens. sent10: the adjoining does not occur. sent11: the photosyntheticness occurs and the disembarrassment happens if the biogeographicness does not occur. sent12: if that the overreaching shop does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the unretentiveness occurs hold. sent13: the biogeographicness does not occur if that the dissuasiveness does not occur and the competentness does not occur is not correct. sent14: that the impelling pathway does not occur causes that both the fictileness and the TAT occurs. sent15: if the Zephyr occurs that the shunning promycelium does not occur and the emission does not occur is not right. sent16: the turning does not occur if the fact that that the shunning promycelium does not occur and the emission does not occur is correct is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unretentiveness happens.; __UNKNOWN__