that the annuitant does outgeneral descriptor and it dings cryobiology does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the nibbler is not a kind of a Capetian and is not a kind of a Teleprompter is not correct if the annuitant does not outgeneral descriptor. sent2: the annuitant does ding cryobiology. sent3: the bricklayer does ding nibbler and it is a refrigerant. sent4: if the stock is a Teleprompter then the fact that the nibbler is a Teleprompter and dings nibbler is false. sent5: if the kopje is a Mesoamerican then the fact that the warrior is Mesoamerican but not hidrotic is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the kopje is not hidrotic and it is unsteady is incorrect. sent7: The nineties does not ding stock. sent8: that the kopje is a kind of a Mesoamerican but it does not ding nibbler is incorrect. sent9: if the stock does not ding nineties then it dings nibbler and it steadies. sent10: if the stock is not non-hidrotic that the fact that the warrior is non-hidrotic but it does not steady does not hold is right. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not Capetian and not a Teleprompter is incorrect then the kopje is Mesoamerican. sent12: the stock does not ding nineties. sent13: if something does not ding nibbler it does not ding cryobiology and is not a kind of a Mesoamerican. sent14: The cryobiology does ding annuitant. sent15: the stock does not ding nibbler if that the warrior is a Mesoamerican but it is not hidrotic is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the annuitant does not outgeneral descriptor.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the nibbler is not Capetian and it is not a Teleprompter is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not Capetian and it is not a kind of a Teleprompter is false.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the kopje is Mesoamerican.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: that the warrior is both Mesoamerican and not hidrotic is not right.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the stock does not ding nibbler.; sent9 & sent12 -> int6: the stock does ding nibbler and does steady.; int6 -> int7: the stock dings nibbler.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the annuitant does outgeneral descriptor.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the annuitant does outgeneral descriptor and dings cryobiology is not correct.
sent13 -> int10: if the nibbler does not ding nibbler it does not ding cryobiology and it is not a Mesoamerican.; sent6 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not hidrotic and it is not steady does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the annuitant does outgeneral descriptor and it dings cryobiology does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the nibbler is not a kind of a Capetian and is not a kind of a Teleprompter is not correct if the annuitant does not outgeneral descriptor. sent2: the annuitant does ding cryobiology. sent3: the bricklayer does ding nibbler and it is a refrigerant. sent4: if the stock is a Teleprompter then the fact that the nibbler is a Teleprompter and dings nibbler is false. sent5: if the kopje is a Mesoamerican then the fact that the warrior is Mesoamerican but not hidrotic is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the kopje is not hidrotic and it is unsteady is incorrect. sent7: The nineties does not ding stock. sent8: that the kopje is a kind of a Mesoamerican but it does not ding nibbler is incorrect. sent9: if the stock does not ding nineties then it dings nibbler and it steadies. sent10: if the stock is not non-hidrotic that the fact that the warrior is non-hidrotic but it does not steady does not hold is right. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not Capetian and not a Teleprompter is incorrect then the kopje is Mesoamerican. sent12: the stock does not ding nineties. sent13: if something does not ding nibbler it does not ding cryobiology and is not a kind of a Mesoamerican. sent14: The cryobiology does ding annuitant. sent15: the stock does not ding nibbler if that the warrior is a Mesoamerican but it is not hidrotic is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the annuitant does not outgeneral descriptor.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the nibbler is not Capetian and it is not a Teleprompter is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not Capetian and it is not a kind of a Teleprompter is false.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the kopje is Mesoamerican.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: that the warrior is both Mesoamerican and not hidrotic is not right.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the stock does not ding nibbler.; sent9 & sent12 -> int6: the stock does ding nibbler and does steady.; int6 -> int7: the stock dings nibbler.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the annuitant does outgeneral descriptor.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__