the fact that if the damping hypophysectomy does not occur the siege and the reception occurs is not right.
sent1: the tear triggers the damping hypophysectomy. sent2: the reception and the damping proton happens. sent3: that the jumpstarting does not occur results in the non-pyrochemicalness. sent4: that the siege does not occur leads to that the damping wyvern does not occur and/or that the jumpstart does not occur. sent5: the pyrochemicalness is prevented by that the damping wyvern does not occur. sent6: that the pyrochemicalness does not occur yields that the tearing occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the siege does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the damping wyvern does not occur or the jumpstarting does not occur or both.; int1 & sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the pyrochemicalness does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the tearing happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the damping hypophysectomy occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the damping hypophysectomy does not occur.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the siege occurs.; sent2 -> int7: the reception happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the siege and the reception happens.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the damping hypophysectomy does not occur the siege and the reception occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the tear triggers the damping hypophysectomy. sent2: the reception and the damping proton happens. sent3: that the jumpstarting does not occur results in the non-pyrochemicalness. sent4: that the siege does not occur leads to that the damping wyvern does not occur and/or that the jumpstart does not occur. sent5: the pyrochemicalness is prevented by that the damping wyvern does not occur. sent6: that the pyrochemicalness does not occur yields that the tearing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the siege does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the damping wyvern does not occur or the jumpstarting does not occur or both.; int1 & sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the pyrochemicalness does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the tearing happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the damping hypophysectomy occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the damping hypophysectomy does not occur.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the siege occurs.; sent2 -> int7: the reception happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the siege and the reception happens.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__