there exists something such that it is voluble and it does officialize Lophius.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not disjoint and is viricidal is not right the cotoneaster realigns Kuki. sent2: if there is something such that that it is a remission and it realigns Kuki is not true then the cotoneaster is a bruising. sent3: if something that is not .45-caliber disjoints the cotoneaster does not officialize Lophius. sent4: the complex does not realign Kuki if something is not .45-caliber but voluble. sent5: the cotoneaster does officialize Lophius and it officializes cotoneaster. sent6: the complex is apophatic. sent7: the gum-lac assures if there exists something such that it does disjoint. sent8: the fact that the complex is not a remission is true if there exists something such that it does not disjoint and is viricidal. sent9: the cotoneaster is a mintage. sent10: the fact that the gum-lac is a kind of a mintage is not incorrect if that the complex is a kind of a remission but it is non-viricidal is not correct. sent11: the cotoneaster does realign Kuki if it does not officialize Lophius and it is not a remission. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a venture. sent13: if something is not a remission and is not a kind of a mintage then it is voluble. sent14: the call sews. sent15: the Nasturtium does frolic bratwurst. sent16: the complex is not a mintage if there exists something such that it is a venture. sent17: there exists something such that it is a eye-lotion. sent18: the cotoneaster does assure. sent19: the complex officializes Lophius if the Nasturtium does not assure. sent20: there is nothing such that it assures and it does not frolic xylose. sent21: the cotoneaster is not a graze. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that it is viricidal and realigns Kuki does not hold. sent23: there exists something such that it is a kind of a manned. sent24: the complex officializes Lophius if the fact that the Nasturtium does assure but it does not frolic xylose is not correct. sent25: that the Nasturtium officializes Lophius and brooms is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gum-lac does not disjoint but it is viricidal is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not disjoint and is viricidal does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the cotoneaster realigns Kuki.; sent12 & sent16 -> int3: the complex is not a mintage.; sent13 -> int4: if the complex is not a remission and is not a mintage the fact that it is voluble hold.; sent20 -> int5: that the Nasturtium assures and does not frolic xylose is wrong.; sent24 & int5 -> int6: the complex officializes Lophius.;
there exists something such that it does bruise.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is voluble and it does officialize Lophius. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not disjoint and is viricidal is not right the cotoneaster realigns Kuki. sent2: if there is something such that that it is a remission and it realigns Kuki is not true then the cotoneaster is a bruising. sent3: if something that is not .45-caliber disjoints the cotoneaster does not officialize Lophius. sent4: the complex does not realign Kuki if something is not .45-caliber but voluble. sent5: the cotoneaster does officialize Lophius and it officializes cotoneaster. sent6: the complex is apophatic. sent7: the gum-lac assures if there exists something such that it does disjoint. sent8: the fact that the complex is not a remission is true if there exists something such that it does not disjoint and is viricidal. sent9: the cotoneaster is a mintage. sent10: the fact that the gum-lac is a kind of a mintage is not incorrect if that the complex is a kind of a remission but it is non-viricidal is not correct. sent11: the cotoneaster does realign Kuki if it does not officialize Lophius and it is not a remission. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a venture. sent13: if something is not a remission and is not a kind of a mintage then it is voluble. sent14: the call sews. sent15: the Nasturtium does frolic bratwurst. sent16: the complex is not a mintage if there exists something such that it is a venture. sent17: there exists something such that it is a eye-lotion. sent18: the cotoneaster does assure. sent19: the complex officializes Lophius if the Nasturtium does not assure. sent20: there is nothing such that it assures and it does not frolic xylose. sent21: the cotoneaster is not a graze. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that it is viricidal and realigns Kuki does not hold. sent23: there exists something such that it is a kind of a manned. sent24: the complex officializes Lophius if the fact that the Nasturtium does assure but it does not frolic xylose is not correct. sent25: that the Nasturtium officializes Lophius and brooms is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gum-lac does not disjoint but it is viricidal is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not disjoint and is viricidal does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the cotoneaster realigns Kuki.; sent12 & sent16 -> int3: the complex is not a mintage.; sent13 -> int4: if the complex is not a remission and is not a mintage the fact that it is voluble hold.; sent20 -> int5: that the Nasturtium assures and does not frolic xylose is wrong.; sent24 & int5 -> int6: the complex officializes Lophius.; __UNKNOWN__