the fact that the undertide does not occur is true.
sent1: that the occasioning does not occur causes the fact that that the dark does not occur and the insufflating urate does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the biosystematicsness does not occur is not wrong then the craps but not the complication happens. sent3: if the fact that the impressiveness does not occur is not false that the fact that the ambassadorialness occurs but the pinochle does not occur is false is correct. sent4: the insufflating Lygaeidae but not the convoy occurs if the toughness does not occur. sent5: the ambassadorialness does not occur if the fact that the ambassadorialness occurs but the pinochle does not occur is not true. sent6: that the inhabiting occurs causes the undertide. sent7: the schlep does not occur. sent8: the non-epizoanness prevents the acarpelousness. sent9: the drilling incurrence occurs. sent10: that the dark and the biosystematicsness occurs leads to that the undertide does not occur. sent11: the insufflating urate does not occur if the fact that the occasioning does not occur but the insufflating urate occurs is incorrect. sent12: both the mediatedness and the non-postbiblicalness happens. sent13: if the fact that the fact that the biosystematicsness does not occur is wrong hold then that the inhabiting occurs is not wrong. sent14: the inhabiting does not occur and the insufflating urate does not occur if that the occasioning occurs hold. sent15: the occasioning does not occur. sent16: if the ambassadorialness does not occur that the occasioning does not occur and the insufflating urate occurs does not hold. sent17: the slithering does not occur. sent18: the craps occurs. sent19: the insufflating urate does not occur. sent20: that the insufflating seraph occurs hold. sent21: the dark occurs if the craps happens and the complication does not occur. sent22: that the encouraging does not occur is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biosystematicsness does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the craps but not the complication happens hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the dark happens.; sent1 & sent15 -> int3: the dark does not occur and the insufflating urate does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the dark does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the biosystematicsness happens.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the inhabiting happens.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the acervateness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the undertide does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the occasioning does not occur causes the fact that that the dark does not occur and the insufflating urate does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the biosystematicsness does not occur is not wrong then the craps but not the complication happens. sent3: if the fact that the impressiveness does not occur is not false that the fact that the ambassadorialness occurs but the pinochle does not occur is false is correct. sent4: the insufflating Lygaeidae but not the convoy occurs if the toughness does not occur. sent5: the ambassadorialness does not occur if the fact that the ambassadorialness occurs but the pinochle does not occur is not true. sent6: that the inhabiting occurs causes the undertide. sent7: the schlep does not occur. sent8: the non-epizoanness prevents the acarpelousness. sent9: the drilling incurrence occurs. sent10: that the dark and the biosystematicsness occurs leads to that the undertide does not occur. sent11: the insufflating urate does not occur if the fact that the occasioning does not occur but the insufflating urate occurs is incorrect. sent12: both the mediatedness and the non-postbiblicalness happens. sent13: if the fact that the fact that the biosystematicsness does not occur is wrong hold then that the inhabiting occurs is not wrong. sent14: the inhabiting does not occur and the insufflating urate does not occur if that the occasioning occurs hold. sent15: the occasioning does not occur. sent16: if the ambassadorialness does not occur that the occasioning does not occur and the insufflating urate occurs does not hold. sent17: the slithering does not occur. sent18: the craps occurs. sent19: the insufflating urate does not occur. sent20: that the insufflating seraph occurs hold. sent21: the dark occurs if the craps happens and the complication does not occur. sent22: that the encouraging does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biosystematicsness does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the craps but not the complication happens hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the dark happens.; sent1 & sent15 -> int3: the dark does not occur and the insufflating urate does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the dark does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the biosystematicsness happens.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the inhabiting happens.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__