the vermifuge is not a subordinating and it is not a kind of a Yosemite.
sent1: the vermifuge is not a subordinating and is not a kind of a Yosemite if the oxford is not a kind of a Yosemite. sent2: if something is a kind of non-unconstitutional thing that reddens instigator the fact that that it does animate is right does not hold. sent3: the fact that the oxford is not a Yosemite is true if something that is animate is a demand. sent4: either the football is not a nibbed or it is not a pawer or both. sent5: the shallu is a kind of a demand that does redden instigator. sent6: the football is a Yosemite and a demand if the fact that the shallu does not animate is right.
sent5 -> int1: that the shallu is a demand hold.;
that the vermifuge is not subordinating and it is not a Yosemite is incorrect.
sent2 -> int2: if the shallu is not unconstitutional and does redden instigator it does not animate.;
$hypothesis$ = the vermifuge is not a subordinating and it is not a kind of a Yosemite. ; $context$ = sent1: the vermifuge is not a subordinating and is not a kind of a Yosemite if the oxford is not a kind of a Yosemite. sent2: if something is a kind of non-unconstitutional thing that reddens instigator the fact that that it does animate is right does not hold. sent3: the fact that the oxford is not a Yosemite is true if something that is animate is a demand. sent4: either the football is not a nibbed or it is not a pawer or both. sent5: the shallu is a kind of a demand that does redden instigator. sent6: the football is a Yosemite and a demand if the fact that the shallu does not animate is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that the shallu is a demand hold.; __UNKNOWN__