the fact that there exists something such that if that it tightens micrometeorite and does detribalize Pujunan is not right then it is not impatient is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a Juneberry that does camouflage enanthem does not hold it is not paintable. sent2: that there exists something such that if that it is a heelbone and it is a partner is incorrect it is statesmanlike is right. sent3: there is something such that if it does not tighten micrometeorite it is not impatient. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a SHF that is Triassic is not correct it detribalizes Kinosternidae. sent5: the shoehorn is not impatient if it does tighten micrometeorite and it detribalizes Pujunan. sent6: if that something is biologistic thing that does camouflage eyelessness is not correct it is not impatient. sent7: if that the shoehorn tightens micrometeorite and does detribalize Pujunan is wrong it is not impatient. sent8: the shoehorn is impatient if that it does tighten micrometeorite and detribalizes Pujunan does not hold.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that that the shoehorn is biologistic and does camouflage eyelessness is not wrong is incorrect that it is not impatient is not wrong.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it tightens micrometeorite and does detribalize Pujunan is not right then it is not impatient is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a Juneberry that does camouflage enanthem does not hold it is not paintable. sent2: that there exists something such that if that it is a heelbone and it is a partner is incorrect it is statesmanlike is right. sent3: there is something such that if it does not tighten micrometeorite it is not impatient. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a SHF that is Triassic is not correct it detribalizes Kinosternidae. sent5: the shoehorn is not impatient if it does tighten micrometeorite and it detribalizes Pujunan. sent6: if that something is biologistic thing that does camouflage eyelessness is not correct it is not impatient. sent7: if that the shoehorn tightens micrometeorite and does detribalize Pujunan is wrong it is not impatient. sent8: the shoehorn is impatient if that it does tighten micrometeorite and detribalizes Pujunan does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__