the cooing undependability does not occur but the daring happens.
sent1: the parliamentariness occurs. sent2: the non-detachableness or the non-polymorphousness or both happens. sent3: the fact that the catching does not occur and/or the immortalizing Islamist does not occur is not true. sent4: if the boarding does not occur the pardonableness does not occur. sent5: that the causativeness does not occur is prevented by the dereliction. sent6: the cooing homogeneity does not occur but the ribbing tapotement occurs. sent7: the duplicity does not occur and/or the greenmail occurs. sent8: the downdraft happens. sent9: the trample does not occur. sent10: the fact that the immortalizing Pizarro does not occur and/or the immortalizing Cockaigne does not occur is wrong. sent11: the dereliction occurs. sent12: either the duplicity happens or the greenmail does not occur or both. sent13: that both the ribbing acknowledgment and the lurching happens leads to that the refunding does not occur. sent14: that the cooing undependability happens is prevented by that the barometricness and the causativeness occurs. sent15: the dare happens and the parliamentariness occurs. sent16: the greenmail does not occur if the barometricness does not occur. sent17: the fact that the maladroitness does not occur and/or the anathematization does not occur is not true. sent18: that the duplicity does not occur or the greenmail does not occur or both does not hold. sent19: the fact that the moresness happens is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the barometricness does not occur is not wrong.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that the greenmail does not occur is true.; int1 -> int2: the duplicity does not occur or the greenmail does not occur or both.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the barometricness occurs.; sent5 & sent11 -> int5: the causativeness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the barometricness happens and the causativeness occurs.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the cooing undependability does not occur.; sent15 -> int8: the fact that the dare occurs is not false.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cooing undependability does not occur and the daring occurs is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the cooing undependability does not occur but the daring happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the parliamentariness occurs. sent2: the non-detachableness or the non-polymorphousness or both happens. sent3: the fact that the catching does not occur and/or the immortalizing Islamist does not occur is not true. sent4: if the boarding does not occur the pardonableness does not occur. sent5: that the causativeness does not occur is prevented by the dereliction. sent6: the cooing homogeneity does not occur but the ribbing tapotement occurs. sent7: the duplicity does not occur and/or the greenmail occurs. sent8: the downdraft happens. sent9: the trample does not occur. sent10: the fact that the immortalizing Pizarro does not occur and/or the immortalizing Cockaigne does not occur is wrong. sent11: the dereliction occurs. sent12: either the duplicity happens or the greenmail does not occur or both. sent13: that both the ribbing acknowledgment and the lurching happens leads to that the refunding does not occur. sent14: that the cooing undependability happens is prevented by that the barometricness and the causativeness occurs. sent15: the dare happens and the parliamentariness occurs. sent16: the greenmail does not occur if the barometricness does not occur. sent17: the fact that the maladroitness does not occur and/or the anathematization does not occur is not true. sent18: that the duplicity does not occur or the greenmail does not occur or both does not hold. sent19: the fact that the moresness happens is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the barometricness does not occur is not wrong.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that the greenmail does not occur is true.; int1 -> int2: the duplicity does not occur or the greenmail does not occur or both.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the barometricness occurs.; sent5 & sent11 -> int5: the causativeness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the barometricness happens and the causativeness occurs.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the cooing undependability does not occur.; sent15 -> int8: the fact that the dare occurs is not false.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__