both the non-hypothermicness and the non-denominationalness happens if the journey happens.
sent1: that the algoidness does not occur causes that the dualisticness happens and the unaggressiveness happens. sent2: that either the culture does not occur or the retraining does not occur or both hold. sent3: that both the hypothermicness and the assault occurs results in the journey. sent4: if the hypothermicness happens and the assault occurs the journey does not occur. sent5: the dualisticness does not occur. sent6: the non-dualisticness or the denominationalness or both occurs. sent7: either the Frostianness does not occur or the echolocation does not occur or both. sent8: the silencing pickaninny is prevented by that the arising does not occur or that the silencing pickaninny does not occur or both. sent9: the Salvadoran occurs. sent10: the continentalness brings about that the silencing marum does not occur and the autolyticness does not occur. sent11: if the non-dualisticness and/or the non-denominationalness occurs the non-denominational does not occur. sent12: the assault happens. sent13: the avoiding occurs. sent14: the replacing happens. sent15: the scouring Friedman does not occur or the meaningfulness does not occur or both. sent16: that the journey does not occur and the denominationalness does not occur leads to the unexpansiveness. sent17: either the appealableness does not occur or the silencing linac does not occur or both. sent18: if the handling happens then the journey does not occur and the denominationalness does not occur. sent19: the handling occurs if that the handling does not occur and the ventilating happens is not right. sent20: that the prompt does not occur hold. sent21: the ovoviviparousness does not occur or the autolyticness happens or both.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hypothermicness happens.; assump2 & sent12 -> int1: both the hypothermicness and the assault occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the journey does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the journey happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the hypothermicness does not occur.; sent5 -> int5: the non-dualisticness and/or the non-denominationalness happens.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the denominationalness does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the hypothermicness does not occur and the denominationalness does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the expansiveness does not occur and the silencing mica does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = both the non-hypothermicness and the non-denominationalness happens if the journey happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the algoidness does not occur causes that the dualisticness happens and the unaggressiveness happens. sent2: that either the culture does not occur or the retraining does not occur or both hold. sent3: that both the hypothermicness and the assault occurs results in the journey. sent4: if the hypothermicness happens and the assault occurs the journey does not occur. sent5: the dualisticness does not occur. sent6: the non-dualisticness or the denominationalness or both occurs. sent7: either the Frostianness does not occur or the echolocation does not occur or both. sent8: the silencing pickaninny is prevented by that the arising does not occur or that the silencing pickaninny does not occur or both. sent9: the Salvadoran occurs. sent10: the continentalness brings about that the silencing marum does not occur and the autolyticness does not occur. sent11: if the non-dualisticness and/or the non-denominationalness occurs the non-denominational does not occur. sent12: the assault happens. sent13: the avoiding occurs. sent14: the replacing happens. sent15: the scouring Friedman does not occur or the meaningfulness does not occur or both. sent16: that the journey does not occur and the denominationalness does not occur leads to the unexpansiveness. sent17: either the appealableness does not occur or the silencing linac does not occur or both. sent18: if the handling happens then the journey does not occur and the denominationalness does not occur. sent19: the handling occurs if that the handling does not occur and the ventilating happens is not right. sent20: that the prompt does not occur hold. sent21: the ovoviviparousness does not occur or the autolyticness happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hypothermicness happens.; assump2 & sent12 -> int1: both the hypothermicness and the assault occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the journey does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the journey happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the hypothermicness does not occur.; sent5 -> int5: the non-dualisticness and/or the non-denominationalness happens.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the denominationalness does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the hypothermicness does not occur and the denominationalness does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__