if the unprovocativeness does not occur then the fact that either the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both is not right.
sent1: the unprovocativeness happens if the respecting geometer happens. sent2: that the illativeness and/or the non-representativeness occurs is not true. sent3: if the fact that the unprovocativeness does not occur is not false then either the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that the spreading agreeableness and/or the rustlessness happens does not hold if the spreading Lyrurus does not occur. sent5: the lowbornness happens. sent6: that the diving Tho does not occur hold. sent7: that the tympanicness does not occur is prevented by that the respecting electrologist happens and/or the non-apothegmaticness. sent8: the fact that the respecting geometer occurs or the skewing happens or both is false. sent9: the fact that the trustfulness or the counterintelligence or both happens is not correct if the spreading flamefish does not occur. sent10: the fact that the unprovocativeness happens is not false if either the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both. sent11: if the unprovocativeness does not occur the respecting geometer does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both is correct.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the unprovocativeness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unprovocativeness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both is not correct.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the unprovocativeness does not occur then the fact that either the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the unprovocativeness happens if the respecting geometer happens. sent2: that the illativeness and/or the non-representativeness occurs is not true. sent3: if the fact that the unprovocativeness does not occur is not false then either the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that the spreading agreeableness and/or the rustlessness happens does not hold if the spreading Lyrurus does not occur. sent5: the lowbornness happens. sent6: that the diving Tho does not occur hold. sent7: that the tympanicness does not occur is prevented by that the respecting electrologist happens and/or the non-apothegmaticness. sent8: the fact that the respecting geometer occurs or the skewing happens or both is false. sent9: the fact that the trustfulness or the counterintelligence or both happens is not correct if the spreading flamefish does not occur. sent10: the fact that the unprovocativeness happens is not false if either the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both. sent11: if the unprovocativeness does not occur the respecting geometer does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both is correct.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the unprovocativeness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unprovocativeness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the respecting geometer happens or the skewing does not occur or both is not correct.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__