the fact that the pimento is not a Ecuadorian and not a brainworker is false.
sent1: the humdinger is a rune if it does not ignite and it belabors introjection. sent2: something is a kind of a brainworker if the fact that it is not a brainworker and it does unpack is not right. sent3: the fact that the Filipino is not a kind of an energy but it is supraorbital is not right. sent4: if the fact that the reprobate is a Ecuadorian is not incorrect the pimento is not a Ecuadorian and not a brainworker. sent5: the reprobate is a Ecuadorian if there is something such that that it is not an energy but supraorbital is incorrect.
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not an energy but supraorbital is wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the reprobate is a kind of a Ecuadorian.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the pimento is not a Ecuadorian and it is not a brainworker is incorrect.
sent2 -> int3: if that the reprobate is not a kind of a brainworker but it does unpack is incorrect it is a brainworker.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pimento is not a Ecuadorian and not a brainworker is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the humdinger is a rune if it does not ignite and it belabors introjection. sent2: something is a kind of a brainworker if the fact that it is not a brainworker and it does unpack is not right. sent3: the fact that the Filipino is not a kind of an energy but it is supraorbital is not right. sent4: if the fact that the reprobate is a Ecuadorian is not incorrect the pimento is not a Ecuadorian and not a brainworker. sent5: the reprobate is a Ecuadorian if there is something such that that it is not an energy but supraorbital is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not an energy but supraorbital is wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the reprobate is a kind of a Ecuadorian.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__