that the accuser is not bronchoscopic hold.
sent1: the accuser is not bronchoscopic if the purification is a waterside but it is not barographic. sent2: the purification is nonmigratory thing that is physiological if the countryman is not a elytron. sent3: the purification is nonmigratory and/or it is not a kind of a tetrachloromethane. sent4: the purification is not a kind of a defoliator. sent5: the tree does drink pilchard. sent6: the purification drinks tree and is a galactagogue. sent7: the accuser is a waterside. sent8: if the accuser is a defoliator it is bronchoscopic. sent9: the purification is a trochee. sent10: if the tree does drink pilchard then the countryman is vitiliginous and/or is not a tetrachloromethane. sent11: something denationalizes Psophia if it is physiological. sent12: if the purification does denationalize Psophia the fact that it is not barographic is correct. sent13: the tree is not a kind of a trochee. sent14: if the purification is a defoliator the accuser is bronchoscopic and/or it is not physiological. sent15: the purification is nonmigratory. sent16: the countryman is not a kind of a trochee. sent17: The pilchard does drink tree. sent18: if the countryman is vitiliginous it is not nonmigratory. sent19: the purification is nonmigratory if the countryman is not a kind of a elytron. sent20: the purification is both a waterside and a trochee if it is not a kind of a defoliator. sent21: the countryman is not a elytron if either it is vitiliginous or it is not a kind of a tetrachloromethane or both. sent22: the countryman is not a elytron if it is vitiliginous. sent23: the tree is nonmigratory. sent24: that something does not drink pilchard and is not bronchoscopic is not right if it is not a kind of a elytron. sent25: if the purification is not a kind of a defoliator it is a trochee.
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: either the countryman is vitiliginous or it is not a kind of a tetrachloromethane or both.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the countryman is not a elytron.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the purification is both nonmigratory and physiological.; int3 -> int4: the purification is physiological.; sent11 -> int5: if the purification is not non-physiological then it does denationalize Psophia.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the purification does denationalize Psophia.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the purification is not barographic.; sent20 & sent4 -> int8: the purification is a kind of a waterside and it is a kind of a trochee.; int8 -> int9: the purification is a waterside.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the purification is a waterside and is not barographic.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
that the accuser is bronchoscopic is right.
sent24 -> int11: if the tree is not a elytron that it does not drink pilchard and it is non-bronchoscopic is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the accuser is not bronchoscopic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the accuser is not bronchoscopic if the purification is a waterside but it is not barographic. sent2: the purification is nonmigratory thing that is physiological if the countryman is not a elytron. sent3: the purification is nonmigratory and/or it is not a kind of a tetrachloromethane. sent4: the purification is not a kind of a defoliator. sent5: the tree does drink pilchard. sent6: the purification drinks tree and is a galactagogue. sent7: the accuser is a waterside. sent8: if the accuser is a defoliator it is bronchoscopic. sent9: the purification is a trochee. sent10: if the tree does drink pilchard then the countryman is vitiliginous and/or is not a tetrachloromethane. sent11: something denationalizes Psophia if it is physiological. sent12: if the purification does denationalize Psophia the fact that it is not barographic is correct. sent13: the tree is not a kind of a trochee. sent14: if the purification is a defoliator the accuser is bronchoscopic and/or it is not physiological. sent15: the purification is nonmigratory. sent16: the countryman is not a kind of a trochee. sent17: The pilchard does drink tree. sent18: if the countryman is vitiliginous it is not nonmigratory. sent19: the purification is nonmigratory if the countryman is not a kind of a elytron. sent20: the purification is both a waterside and a trochee if it is not a kind of a defoliator. sent21: the countryman is not a elytron if either it is vitiliginous or it is not a kind of a tetrachloromethane or both. sent22: the countryman is not a elytron if it is vitiliginous. sent23: the tree is nonmigratory. sent24: that something does not drink pilchard and is not bronchoscopic is not right if it is not a kind of a elytron. sent25: if the purification is not a kind of a defoliator it is a trochee. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: either the countryman is vitiliginous or it is not a kind of a tetrachloromethane or both.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the countryman is not a elytron.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the purification is both nonmigratory and physiological.; int3 -> int4: the purification is physiological.; sent11 -> int5: if the purification is not non-physiological then it does denationalize Psophia.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the purification does denationalize Psophia.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the purification is not barographic.; sent20 & sent4 -> int8: the purification is a kind of a waterside and it is a kind of a trochee.; int8 -> int9: the purification is a waterside.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the purification is a waterside and is not barographic.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__