there is something such that if it is an old then it is Baptistic.
sent1: if the petard is Baptistic then the signal is an identification. sent2: if the fact that the Cabernet does not spoon myth and does not satisfice does not hold then the ambulance does not ice Boeotia. sent3: if the atoll is both Baptistic and a Maximian it smooths. sent4: the fact that the fact that something does not spoon myth and does not satisfice is not true if it does not rouge hold. sent5: if something is an identification but it is not a subordinateness then the fact that it is not Baptistic is not true. sent6: if the petard is a kind of an old then it is an identification and is not a subordinateness. sent7: if something that enslaves folio does not blur then it beads praya. sent8: the petard is not a relative if that the fact that the ambulance is a kind of a relative and it is starless is incorrect is not wrong. sent9: the folio is not a Basiliscus if the fact that it is ameboid hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the petard is an old.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the petard is both an identification and not a subordinateness.; sent5 -> int2: that the petard is Baptistic is not false if it is an identification and is not a kind of a subordinateness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the petard is Baptistic.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the fact that the petard is an old is true then it is Baptistic.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the signal is an identification.
sent4 -> int5: that the derrick does not spoon myth and does not satisfice does not hold if it does not rouge.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is an old then it is Baptistic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the petard is Baptistic then the signal is an identification. sent2: if the fact that the Cabernet does not spoon myth and does not satisfice does not hold then the ambulance does not ice Boeotia. sent3: if the atoll is both Baptistic and a Maximian it smooths. sent4: the fact that the fact that something does not spoon myth and does not satisfice is not true if it does not rouge hold. sent5: if something is an identification but it is not a subordinateness then the fact that it is not Baptistic is not true. sent6: if the petard is a kind of an old then it is an identification and is not a subordinateness. sent7: if something that enslaves folio does not blur then it beads praya. sent8: the petard is not a relative if that the fact that the ambulance is a kind of a relative and it is starless is incorrect is not wrong. sent9: the folio is not a Basiliscus if the fact that it is ameboid hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the petard is an old.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the petard is both an identification and not a subordinateness.; sent5 -> int2: that the petard is Baptistic is not false if it is an identification and is not a kind of a subordinateness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the petard is Baptistic.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the fact that the petard is an old is true then it is Baptistic.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__