there exists something such that if it does not dispel then the fact that it is not unreliable and it caseates is not correct.
sent1: that something is not unreliable but it does caseate does not hold if the fact that it does not dispel is correct. sent2: something is not a shadow and is a Solomons if it is not a kind of a stub. sent3: there exists something such that if it is aciculate that it does not catalyze antidiuretic and is a utilizer is wrong. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a soteriology then it is non-crinoid and it is an oleander. sent5: if the gidgee is not common then it is not neutering but optative. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not slice deipnosophist is not wrong that that it does signify and fingerprints prototherian is correct does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: that the antidiuretic is not unreliable but it does caseate is not right if it does not dispel.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not dispel then the fact that it is not unreliable and it caseates is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not unreliable but it does caseate does not hold if the fact that it does not dispel is correct. sent2: something is not a shadow and is a Solomons if it is not a kind of a stub. sent3: there exists something such that if it is aciculate that it does not catalyze antidiuretic and is a utilizer is wrong. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a soteriology then it is non-crinoid and it is an oleander. sent5: if the gidgee is not common then it is not neutering but optative. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not slice deipnosophist is not wrong that that it does signify and fingerprints prototherian is correct does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: that the antidiuretic is not unreliable but it does caseate is not right if it does not dispel.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__