the banyan is a kind of a langouste.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is not a hitch but aspectual does not hold. sent2: the fact that the tailplane is a Aerobacter hold if the nosewheel is proverbial. sent3: that there exists something such that that it is not a hitch and is non-aspectual does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a hitch and is not aspectual is wrong the tailplane does govern steal. sent5: the banyan is a kind of a Maintenon. sent6: the tailplane does fudge gripe. sent7: something is a kind of a intransigency if it is a langouste. sent8: something is both muciferous and a decrescendo. sent9: the tailplane does govern Zama if the fact that that it does not fudge IAEA and it is a predicament hold is wrong. sent10: something is not a hitch and it is not aspectual. sent11: if the tailplane is not aspectual then the fact that the centrex is a kind of a jigger and does not govern steal does not hold. sent12: if something is a Aerobacter and it hitches then it is not aspectual. sent13: there exists something such that it is a kind of an angstrom. sent14: the tailplane does govern steal if something is aspectual. sent15: the fact that something is not a langouste but a Maintenon is not correct if it is not a unexpectedness. sent16: something is a intransigency and it is a bidet if it is not a langouste. sent17: the banyan is a kind of a tag. sent18: there is something such that it is significant. sent19: the tailplane is a applejack and is a jigger. sent20: the nosewheel is proverbial. sent21: the centrex is a Maintenon if the banyan is a bidet. sent22: the lodge does partner and it is a charioteer. sent23: the tailplane is a unexpectedness and it is a jigger. sent24: if something governs Zama then it is a hitch.
sent16 -> int1: the banyan is a kind of a intransigency and it is a bidet if it is not a langouste.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the banyan is not a kind of a langouste.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the banyan is a intransigency and it is a kind of a bidet.; int2 -> int3: the banyan is a bidet.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the centrex is a Maintenon.; sent23 -> int5: the tailplane is a unexpectedness.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the tailplane does govern steal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the tailplane is a unexpectedness that governs steal.; int7 -> int8: something is a unexpectedness and it governs steal.;
the banyan is not a kind of a langouste.
sent15 -> int9: that the centrex is not a langouste but it is a Maintenon is not right if it is not a kind of a unexpectedness.; sent12 -> int10: that if the tailplane is both a Aerobacter and the hitch the tailplane is not aspectual is not false.; sent2 & sent20 -> int11: the tailplane is a Aerobacter.; sent24 -> int12: the tailplane is a hitch if it governs Zama.; sent22 -> int13: the lodge is a kind of a partner.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it does partner.;
$hypothesis$ = the banyan is a kind of a langouste. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is not a hitch but aspectual does not hold. sent2: the fact that the tailplane is a Aerobacter hold if the nosewheel is proverbial. sent3: that there exists something such that that it is not a hitch and is non-aspectual does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a hitch and is not aspectual is wrong the tailplane does govern steal. sent5: the banyan is a kind of a Maintenon. sent6: the tailplane does fudge gripe. sent7: something is a kind of a intransigency if it is a langouste. sent8: something is both muciferous and a decrescendo. sent9: the tailplane does govern Zama if the fact that that it does not fudge IAEA and it is a predicament hold is wrong. sent10: something is not a hitch and it is not aspectual. sent11: if the tailplane is not aspectual then the fact that the centrex is a kind of a jigger and does not govern steal does not hold. sent12: if something is a Aerobacter and it hitches then it is not aspectual. sent13: there exists something such that it is a kind of an angstrom. sent14: the tailplane does govern steal if something is aspectual. sent15: the fact that something is not a langouste but a Maintenon is not correct if it is not a unexpectedness. sent16: something is a intransigency and it is a bidet if it is not a langouste. sent17: the banyan is a kind of a tag. sent18: there is something such that it is significant. sent19: the tailplane is a applejack and is a jigger. sent20: the nosewheel is proverbial. sent21: the centrex is a Maintenon if the banyan is a bidet. sent22: the lodge does partner and it is a charioteer. sent23: the tailplane is a unexpectedness and it is a jigger. sent24: if something governs Zama then it is a hitch. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the banyan is a kind of a intransigency and it is a bidet if it is not a langouste.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the banyan is not a kind of a langouste.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the banyan is a intransigency and it is a kind of a bidet.; int2 -> int3: the banyan is a bidet.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the centrex is a Maintenon.; sent23 -> int5: the tailplane is a unexpectedness.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the tailplane does govern steal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the tailplane is a unexpectedness that governs steal.; int7 -> int8: something is a unexpectedness and it governs steal.; __UNKNOWN__