if the noradrenaline is not a sperm that the macromolecule is unlike and not a send-off is wrong.
sent1: if the noradrenaline is not a kind of a sperm then that that it is non-phonological thing that acquaints Yahi is not wrong is not right. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not phonological and acquaints Yahi does not hold the snood is a goal. sent3: that the macromolecule is unlike thing that is a send-off is incorrect if the noradrenaline is not a sperm. sent4: something is not phonological but it does acquaint Yahi. sent5: the fact that the fact that the macromolecule is a sequela and is not a sperm hold does not hold. sent6: the macromolecule is not a settlor. sent7: if the macromolecule is not phonological then the noradrenaline acquaints Yahi but it is not unlike. sent8: the noradrenaline tightens. sent9: that something is a kind of unlike thing that is not a send-off does not hold if it is a kind of an ecliptic. sent10: the macromolecule is a kind of a goal if the snood is an ecliptic. sent11: the macromolecule is unlike and is not a send-off. sent12: if the fact that the noradrenaline is not a goal hold the snood is a sperm and it is an amino. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does predate and is a orangeade is not true. sent14: the fact that the macromolecule is a kind of unlike thing that is a send-off is wrong. sent15: that the macromolecule is not a sperm but unlike is not correct if it does not acquaint Yahi. sent16: the snood is an ecliptic if the macromolecule is a goal. sent17: if something is a send-off then that it is both phonological and a sperm is wrong. sent18: the fact that something is not unlike or is a send-off or both does not hold if it is not a settlor. sent19: if that the snood is a kind of a goal is right the fact that the macromolecule is an ecliptic is not false. sent20: the snood is not a send-off. sent21: something that is a kind of an ecliptic is unlike but not a send-off.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noradrenaline is not a sperm.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the noradrenaline is a kind of non-phonological thing that does acquaint Yahi is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-phonological thing that acquaints Yahi is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the snood is a goal.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the macromolecule is a kind of an ecliptic.; sent9 -> int5: that the macromolecule is both unlike and not a send-off does not hold if it is an ecliptic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the macromolecule is both not like and not a send-off is not correct.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the snood is amino.
sent18 -> int7: if the macromolecule is not a settlor then that it is not unlike or it is a send-off or both does not hold.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the fact that the macromolecule is not unlike or a send-off or both is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = if the noradrenaline is not a sperm that the macromolecule is unlike and not a send-off is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the noradrenaline is not a kind of a sperm then that that it is non-phonological thing that acquaints Yahi is not wrong is not right. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not phonological and acquaints Yahi does not hold the snood is a goal. sent3: that the macromolecule is unlike thing that is a send-off is incorrect if the noradrenaline is not a sperm. sent4: something is not phonological but it does acquaint Yahi. sent5: the fact that the fact that the macromolecule is a sequela and is not a sperm hold does not hold. sent6: the macromolecule is not a settlor. sent7: if the macromolecule is not phonological then the noradrenaline acquaints Yahi but it is not unlike. sent8: the noradrenaline tightens. sent9: that something is a kind of unlike thing that is not a send-off does not hold if it is a kind of an ecliptic. sent10: the macromolecule is a kind of a goal if the snood is an ecliptic. sent11: the macromolecule is unlike and is not a send-off. sent12: if the fact that the noradrenaline is not a goal hold the snood is a sperm and it is an amino. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does predate and is a orangeade is not true. sent14: the fact that the macromolecule is a kind of unlike thing that is a send-off is wrong. sent15: that the macromolecule is not a sperm but unlike is not correct if it does not acquaint Yahi. sent16: the snood is an ecliptic if the macromolecule is a goal. sent17: if something is a send-off then that it is both phonological and a sperm is wrong. sent18: the fact that something is not unlike or is a send-off or both does not hold if it is not a settlor. sent19: if that the snood is a kind of a goal is right the fact that the macromolecule is an ecliptic is not false. sent20: the snood is not a send-off. sent21: something that is a kind of an ecliptic is unlike but not a send-off. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noradrenaline is not a sperm.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the noradrenaline is a kind of non-phonological thing that does acquaint Yahi is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-phonological thing that acquaints Yahi is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the snood is a goal.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the macromolecule is a kind of an ecliptic.; sent9 -> int5: that the macromolecule is both unlike and not a send-off does not hold if it is an ecliptic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the macromolecule is both not like and not a send-off is not correct.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__