the snare furrows Mozambican.
sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a executability that is not stylish is false if it is not a lyric. sent2: the distillation is not lyric. sent3: the tambourine is inconsolable. sent4: that the tambourine is not undatable is true. sent5: if the snare does furrow Mozambican it is inconsolable. sent6: if something does not enliven steeplejack it is inconsolable and it does proposition chemist. sent7: the Chechen is inconsolable. sent8: if the snare is inconsolable then the tambourine is a kind of a Serkin. sent9: the snare furrows Mozambican if it is a kind of a Serkin. sent10: that the tambourine is not a kind of a Serkin is not false. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is a executability and non-stylish does not hold then the temple enlivens blindfold. sent12: if the tambourine furrows Mozambican then the snare is a Serkin. sent13: the fact that the tambourine furrows Mozambican hold if the snare is a Serkin. sent14: the tambourine is a Serkin if it furrows Mozambican. sent15: the tambourine does not furrow Mozambican if the fact that the snare is a Serkin but not inconsolable is true. sent16: if the tambourine furrows Mozambican then the snare is inconsolable. sent17: if that something is a settler and enlivens steeplejack does not hold it does not proposition chemist. sent18: something is not a Serkin and/or it does not furrow Mozambican if it is inconsolable. sent19: if something does enliven blindfold the fact that the claw is a kind of a settler and it does enliven steeplejack is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snare furrows Mozambican.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the snare is not consolable.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the tambourine is a Serkin is not incorrect.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the snare furrows Mozambican.
sent18 -> int4: the tambourine is not a kind of a Serkin and/or it does not furrow Mozambican if it is inconsolable.; sent6 -> int5: the tambourine is inconsolable and does proposition chemist if it does not enliven steeplejack.;
$hypothesis$ = the snare furrows Mozambican. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a executability that is not stylish is false if it is not a lyric. sent2: the distillation is not lyric. sent3: the tambourine is inconsolable. sent4: that the tambourine is not undatable is true. sent5: if the snare does furrow Mozambican it is inconsolable. sent6: if something does not enliven steeplejack it is inconsolable and it does proposition chemist. sent7: the Chechen is inconsolable. sent8: if the snare is inconsolable then the tambourine is a kind of a Serkin. sent9: the snare furrows Mozambican if it is a kind of a Serkin. sent10: that the tambourine is not a kind of a Serkin is not false. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is a executability and non-stylish does not hold then the temple enlivens blindfold. sent12: if the tambourine furrows Mozambican then the snare is a Serkin. sent13: the fact that the tambourine furrows Mozambican hold if the snare is a Serkin. sent14: the tambourine is a Serkin if it furrows Mozambican. sent15: the tambourine does not furrow Mozambican if the fact that the snare is a Serkin but not inconsolable is true. sent16: if the tambourine furrows Mozambican then the snare is inconsolable. sent17: if that something is a settler and enlivens steeplejack does not hold it does not proposition chemist. sent18: something is not a Serkin and/or it does not furrow Mozambican if it is inconsolable. sent19: if something does enliven blindfold the fact that the claw is a kind of a settler and it does enliven steeplejack is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snare furrows Mozambican.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the snare is not consolable.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the tambourine is a Serkin is not incorrect.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__