the fact that the wisp is a kind of a twin and it is Yeatsian is false.
sent1: if the tulip does flick diabolism and does ignore perambulation the diamagnet does not flick diabolism. sent2: something does not alter and does not flick Suharto if it is weedless. sent3: if something that does not alter does not flick Suharto it does not varnish wisp. sent4: the bulbul is Yeatsian if that the wisp is a kind of non-Yeatsian thing that does not alter does not hold. sent5: the fact that the phytoplankton does varnish wisp and it is Yeatsian is not right if there is something such that the fact that it does not varnish wisp is not false. sent6: if something does not flick diabolism then that it is not weedless and is not non-Donnean is not true. sent7: the fact that the wisp is Yeatsian hold. sent8: the wisp does varnish wisp. sent9: the wisp is a kind of a twin if that the fact that it does not varnish wisp and it alters is not incorrect is incorrect. sent10: if there exists something such that it does ignore MPS then the tulip does flick diabolism and does ignore perambulation. sent11: The wisp does varnish wisp. sent12: the fact that if that something is both weedy and not non-Donnean does not hold then it is weedy is not false. sent13: the diamagnet is weedless. sent14: if the fact that the phytoplankton does varnish wisp and is Yeatsian does not hold then it is not Yeatsian. sent15: if something flicks Suharto that the phytoplankton is not a kind of a twin and does varnish wisp is incorrect. sent16: that something does ignore MPS hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wisp does not varnish wisp and alters.; assump1 -> int1: the wisp does not varnish wisp.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the wisp does not varnish wisp and does alter does not hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the wisp does twin.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the wisp twins and is Yeatsian is not right.
sent3 -> int5: the diamagnet does not varnish wisp if it does not alter and does not flick Suharto.; sent2 -> int6: if the diamagnet is weedless then it does not alter and does not flick Suharto.; sent12 -> int7: if that the diamagnet is not weedless but it is Donnean is incorrect then it is weedless.; sent6 -> int8: if the diamagnet does not flick diabolism then the fact that it is weedy but not non-Donnean is wrong.; sent16 & sent10 -> int9: the tulip flicks diabolism and ignores perambulation.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the diamagnet does not flick diabolism.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the diamagnet is both not weedless and Donnean is not true.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the diamagnet is weedless.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the diamagnet does not alter and does not flick Suharto.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the diamagnet does not varnish wisp.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it does not varnish wisp.; int15 & sent5 -> int16: that the phytoplankton varnishes wisp and it is Yeatsian is false.; sent14 & int16 -> int17: the phytoplankton is not Yeatsian.; int17 -> int18: something is not Yeatsian.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the wisp is a kind of a twin and it is Yeatsian is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tulip does flick diabolism and does ignore perambulation the diamagnet does not flick diabolism. sent2: something does not alter and does not flick Suharto if it is weedless. sent3: if something that does not alter does not flick Suharto it does not varnish wisp. sent4: the bulbul is Yeatsian if that the wisp is a kind of non-Yeatsian thing that does not alter does not hold. sent5: the fact that the phytoplankton does varnish wisp and it is Yeatsian is not right if there is something such that the fact that it does not varnish wisp is not false. sent6: if something does not flick diabolism then that it is not weedless and is not non-Donnean is not true. sent7: the fact that the wisp is Yeatsian hold. sent8: the wisp does varnish wisp. sent9: the wisp is a kind of a twin if that the fact that it does not varnish wisp and it alters is not incorrect is incorrect. sent10: if there exists something such that it does ignore MPS then the tulip does flick diabolism and does ignore perambulation. sent11: The wisp does varnish wisp. sent12: the fact that if that something is both weedy and not non-Donnean does not hold then it is weedy is not false. sent13: the diamagnet is weedless. sent14: if the fact that the phytoplankton does varnish wisp and is Yeatsian does not hold then it is not Yeatsian. sent15: if something flicks Suharto that the phytoplankton is not a kind of a twin and does varnish wisp is incorrect. sent16: that something does ignore MPS hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wisp does not varnish wisp and alters.; assump1 -> int1: the wisp does not varnish wisp.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the wisp does not varnish wisp and does alter does not hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the wisp does twin.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__