the fact that the Guyanese does not conscript inaptness and is a Eisenhower does not hold.
sent1: something that does not astringe and is not a thrill is not daisylike. sent2: if either the Swede is a kind of a domination or it is a Nuphar or both then the workhouse is not a kind of a Eisenhower. sent3: there is something such that that it does not denationalize ejaculator and denationalizes workhouse is not correct. sent4: the fact that the sperm is not a Erinaceus and not the smog if the sperm is not a sweatshop hold. sent5: if the sperm is not a Erinaceus the fact that it is not a kind of a graphics and is succinic is not correct. sent6: something that is a domination is a Eisenhower. sent7: the sperm is not a sweatshop. sent8: the fact that something is not synclinal and is glycogenic is incorrect if it is a noradrenaline. sent9: the Swede is a Nuphar if the sperm is important. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is important and it is a kind of a Eisenhower is false. sent11: if the fact that something is not synclinal and is glycogenic is false then it is not tonsorial. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is not important and it is a kind of a Eisenhower does not hold then the sperm is a kind of a Nuphar. sent13: the Guyanese is a Nuphar and important if there exists something such that it is not tonsorial. sent14: the sperm is not purposeless. sent15: if something is daisylike then it is a kind of a domination. sent16: the sperm is important if there exists something such that that it does not denationalize ejaculator and denationalizes workhouse is not right. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Eisenhower and it conscripts inaptness does not hold the Guyanese is important. sent18: if the fact that something does denationalize ejaculator hold the sperm is important. sent19: if that the sperm is not a graphics but it is succinic is false it is a kind of a noradrenaline. sent20: if something that is a Nuphar is important then it does not conscript inaptness. sent21: if the workhouse is not a Eisenhower that the Guyanese does not conscript inaptness and is a Eisenhower is wrong.
sent3 & sent16 -> int1: the sperm is important.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the Swede is a Nuphar.; int2 -> int3: the Swede is a domination and/or it is a Nuphar.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the workhouse is not a kind of a Eisenhower is not false.; sent21 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the Guyanese does not conscript inaptness and is a Eisenhower.
sent20 -> int5: if the Guyanese is a kind of a Nuphar and is important then it does not conscript inaptness.; sent11 -> int6: the sperm is not tonsorial if that it is not synclinal and it is glycogenic is not right.; sent8 -> int7: that if the sperm is a kind of the noradrenaline then the fact that the sperm is not synclinal and is not non-glycogenic is false is correct.; sent4 & sent7 -> int8: the sperm is not a Erinaceus and is not a smog.; int8 -> int9: the sperm is not a Erinaceus.; sent5 & int9 -> int10: that the sperm is not graphics and is succinic is wrong.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: the sperm is a noradrenaline.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the sperm is not synclinal but glycogenic is not right.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the sperm is not tonsorial.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not tonsorial.; int14 & sent13 -> int15: the Guyanese is a Nuphar and is important.; int5 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the Guyanese does not conscript inaptness is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int17: if that the Guyanese is a domination is not wrong it is a kind of a Eisenhower.; sent15 -> int18: the Guyanese is a domination if the fact that it is daisylike is not false.; sent1 -> int19: the fact that the Guyanese is daisylike if the Guyanese does not astringe and does not thrill is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Guyanese does not conscript inaptness and is a Eisenhower does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not astringe and is not a thrill is not daisylike. sent2: if either the Swede is a kind of a domination or it is a Nuphar or both then the workhouse is not a kind of a Eisenhower. sent3: there is something such that that it does not denationalize ejaculator and denationalizes workhouse is not correct. sent4: the fact that the sperm is not a Erinaceus and not the smog if the sperm is not a sweatshop hold. sent5: if the sperm is not a Erinaceus the fact that it is not a kind of a graphics and is succinic is not correct. sent6: something that is a domination is a Eisenhower. sent7: the sperm is not a sweatshop. sent8: the fact that something is not synclinal and is glycogenic is incorrect if it is a noradrenaline. sent9: the Swede is a Nuphar if the sperm is important. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is important and it is a kind of a Eisenhower is false. sent11: if the fact that something is not synclinal and is glycogenic is false then it is not tonsorial. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is not important and it is a kind of a Eisenhower does not hold then the sperm is a kind of a Nuphar. sent13: the Guyanese is a Nuphar and important if there exists something such that it is not tonsorial. sent14: the sperm is not purposeless. sent15: if something is daisylike then it is a kind of a domination. sent16: the sperm is important if there exists something such that that it does not denationalize ejaculator and denationalizes workhouse is not right. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Eisenhower and it conscripts inaptness does not hold the Guyanese is important. sent18: if the fact that something does denationalize ejaculator hold the sperm is important. sent19: if that the sperm is not a graphics but it is succinic is false it is a kind of a noradrenaline. sent20: if something that is a Nuphar is important then it does not conscript inaptness. sent21: if the workhouse is not a Eisenhower that the Guyanese does not conscript inaptness and is a Eisenhower is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent16 -> int1: the sperm is important.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the Swede is a Nuphar.; int2 -> int3: the Swede is a domination and/or it is a Nuphar.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the workhouse is not a kind of a Eisenhower is not false.; sent21 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__