the taster is a Brazilian.
sent1: that something demoralizes is true if it is not allantoic. sent2: if the taster does ambulate then it does not offer allotrope. sent3: if that something does not tease graphic and it is not a saddle is false then it does ambulate. sent4: if that the taster does not demoralize and it is not a kuru is not correct it does not ambulate. sent5: if the immunoglobulin is a parang and it is a Brazilian the taster is not Brazilian. sent6: the infundibulum is not a saddle. sent7: if the fact that something is not virulent is right it is Italian. sent8: the fact that the immunoglobulin does not tease graphic and it is not a saddle is not correct. sent9: the Guest ambulates if the immunoglobulin is not allantoic but it does ambulates. sent10: the taster demoralizes. sent11: everything is not a commissariat but a bulwark. sent12: that the taster is both not a parang and not a saddle is incorrect. sent13: if something is defeasible it is a kind of a bud. sent14: the melatonin is not a kind of a commissariat if the walk-through shatters but it does not unbend applecart. sent15: if the taster is not allantoic it demoralizes. sent16: that the immunoglobulin is a kind of a parang and it is a saddle is true if the melatonin is not a kind of a commissariat. sent17: the fact that if the taster is not the Wiccan then the taster does offer Elamite is not incorrect. sent18: if something is not allantoic then it is a kind of a Brazilian and demoralizes. sent19: the taster is not allantoic if the fact that it is not a parang and it is not a kind of a saddle is not correct. sent20: if the taster is a saddle it is not allantoic. sent21: if that something does not demoralize is correct then it is a Brazilian and it is a kind of a parang. sent22: that something is a kind of a parang and it is allantoic is not correct if it does not tease Appaloosa.
sent18 -> int1: if the fact that the taster is not allantoic hold it is a Brazilian and it does demoralize.; sent19 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the taster is not allantoic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the taster is Brazilian thing that demoralizes.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the taster is not Brazilian.
$hypothesis$ = the taster is a Brazilian. ; $context$ = sent1: that something demoralizes is true if it is not allantoic. sent2: if the taster does ambulate then it does not offer allotrope. sent3: if that something does not tease graphic and it is not a saddle is false then it does ambulate. sent4: if that the taster does not demoralize and it is not a kuru is not correct it does not ambulate. sent5: if the immunoglobulin is a parang and it is a Brazilian the taster is not Brazilian. sent6: the infundibulum is not a saddle. sent7: if the fact that something is not virulent is right it is Italian. sent8: the fact that the immunoglobulin does not tease graphic and it is not a saddle is not correct. sent9: the Guest ambulates if the immunoglobulin is not allantoic but it does ambulates. sent10: the taster demoralizes. sent11: everything is not a commissariat but a bulwark. sent12: that the taster is both not a parang and not a saddle is incorrect. sent13: if something is defeasible it is a kind of a bud. sent14: the melatonin is not a kind of a commissariat if the walk-through shatters but it does not unbend applecart. sent15: if the taster is not allantoic it demoralizes. sent16: that the immunoglobulin is a kind of a parang and it is a saddle is true if the melatonin is not a kind of a commissariat. sent17: the fact that if the taster is not the Wiccan then the taster does offer Elamite is not incorrect. sent18: if something is not allantoic then it is a kind of a Brazilian and demoralizes. sent19: the taster is not allantoic if the fact that it is not a parang and it is not a kind of a saddle is not correct. sent20: if the taster is a saddle it is not allantoic. sent21: if that something does not demoralize is correct then it is a Brazilian and it is a kind of a parang. sent22: that something is a kind of a parang and it is allantoic is not correct if it does not tease Appaloosa. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: if the fact that the taster is not allantoic hold it is a Brazilian and it does demoralize.; sent19 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the taster is not allantoic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the taster is Brazilian thing that demoralizes.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__