the juvenescence is an answering if the eparch is a kind of a rationale.
sent1: if the juvenescence does hit then that the eparch does answer is right. sent2: the eparch is a rationale if the breeding goes but it is not an answering. sent3: if the breeding does go the juvenescence answers. sent4: the eparch is not a hit. sent5: the ladybug is a soak but it is not a Amberboa. sent6: if the eparch is a kind of a rationale that is not a kind of a hit the breeding does go. sent7: the juvenescence is a rationale. sent8: if that either something is a hit or it is not a go or both is not true it is not a rationale. sent9: the eparch cambers Serkin but it does not gear mane. sent10: the breeding does answer. sent11: if the juvenescence hits but it is not an answering then the breeding is a kind of a go. sent12: the tyrannosaur does not hit. sent13: the snake does go. sent14: the thill does go. sent15: the eparch is a kind of a rationale that is not a go. sent16: the eparch does resist. sent17: if the fact that something does camber demonetization is true then the fact that it hits or it does not go or both does not hold. sent18: the eparch answers if the juvenescence is a rationale. sent19: something cambers demonetization if it is a country-dance.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eparch is a rationale.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the eparch is a rationale but it does not hit.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the breeding is a go.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the juvenescence does answer is true.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the eparch answers.
sent8 -> int4: that the breeding is not a kind of a rationale hold if that it is a hit or is not a go or both is not correct.; sent17 -> int5: if that the breeding does camber demonetization is not false that it is a kind of a hit and/or it does not go does not hold.; sent19 -> int6: if the breeding is a kind of a country-dance then it does camber demonetization.;
$hypothesis$ = the juvenescence is an answering if the eparch is a kind of a rationale. ; $context$ = sent1: if the juvenescence does hit then that the eparch does answer is right. sent2: the eparch is a rationale if the breeding goes but it is not an answering. sent3: if the breeding does go the juvenescence answers. sent4: the eparch is not a hit. sent5: the ladybug is a soak but it is not a Amberboa. sent6: if the eparch is a kind of a rationale that is not a kind of a hit the breeding does go. sent7: the juvenescence is a rationale. sent8: if that either something is a hit or it is not a go or both is not true it is not a rationale. sent9: the eparch cambers Serkin but it does not gear mane. sent10: the breeding does answer. sent11: if the juvenescence hits but it is not an answering then the breeding is a kind of a go. sent12: the tyrannosaur does not hit. sent13: the snake does go. sent14: the thill does go. sent15: the eparch is a kind of a rationale that is not a go. sent16: the eparch does resist. sent17: if the fact that something does camber demonetization is true then the fact that it hits or it does not go or both does not hold. sent18: the eparch answers if the juvenescence is a rationale. sent19: something cambers demonetization if it is a country-dance. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eparch is a rationale.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the eparch is a rationale but it does not hit.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the breeding is a go.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the juvenescence does answer is true.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__