the anonymousness does not occur and/or the providentialness occurs.
sent1: not the congeeing but the turfing pointillism happens. sent2: that the turfing Pitman does not occur and the kafkaesqueness does not occur leads to that the anonymousness does not occur. sent3: both the non-probabilisticness and the lenticness happens. sent4: that the turfing infinitive happens but the minorness does not occur is brought about by the non-perfectness. sent5: the hemalness occurs if the perfecting does not occur. sent6: the hemalness happens if the turfing infinitive does not occur and/or the perfectness does not occur. sent7: the divaricating smoke occurs. sent8: the fact that both the minorness and the turfing infinitive occurs does not hold. sent9: the acarpelousness does not occur. sent10: if the perfecting does not occur the minorness happens and the turfing infinitive occurs. sent11: the hemalness does not occur if both the non-probabilisticness and the lenticness happens. sent12: the kafkaesqueness occurs if the fact that the fact that the fact that both the approving and the non-kafkaesqueness occurs is not false is not correct is not incorrect. sent13: the turfing Pitman does not occur but the approving occurs. sent14: the approving occurs. sent15: that the anonymousness does not occur and/or the providentialness happens is incorrect if the minorness happens. sent16: the kafkaesqueness does not occur if that the fact that the minorness but not the turfing infinitive occurs is not false is not correct. sent17: the anonymousness occurs or the providentialness occurs or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the minorness but not the turfing infinitive occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the turfing infinitive does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the turfing infinitive does not occur or the perfecting does not occur or both.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the hemalness occurs is not wrong.; sent11 & sent3 -> int4: the hemalness does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the minorness but not the turfing infinitive occurs is incorrect.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the kafkaesqueness does not occur.; sent13 -> int8: the turfing Pitman does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the turfing Pitman does not occur and the kafkaesqueness does not occur.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: that the anonymousness does not occur hold.; int10 -> hypothesis;
that the anonymousness does not occur and/or the providentialness occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the anonymousness does not occur and/or the providentialness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: not the congeeing but the turfing pointillism happens. sent2: that the turfing Pitman does not occur and the kafkaesqueness does not occur leads to that the anonymousness does not occur. sent3: both the non-probabilisticness and the lenticness happens. sent4: that the turfing infinitive happens but the minorness does not occur is brought about by the non-perfectness. sent5: the hemalness occurs if the perfecting does not occur. sent6: the hemalness happens if the turfing infinitive does not occur and/or the perfectness does not occur. sent7: the divaricating smoke occurs. sent8: the fact that both the minorness and the turfing infinitive occurs does not hold. sent9: the acarpelousness does not occur. sent10: if the perfecting does not occur the minorness happens and the turfing infinitive occurs. sent11: the hemalness does not occur if both the non-probabilisticness and the lenticness happens. sent12: the kafkaesqueness occurs if the fact that the fact that the fact that both the approving and the non-kafkaesqueness occurs is not false is not correct is not incorrect. sent13: the turfing Pitman does not occur but the approving occurs. sent14: the approving occurs. sent15: that the anonymousness does not occur and/or the providentialness happens is incorrect if the minorness happens. sent16: the kafkaesqueness does not occur if that the fact that the minorness but not the turfing infinitive occurs is not false is not correct. sent17: the anonymousness occurs or the providentialness occurs or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the minorness but not the turfing infinitive occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the turfing infinitive does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the turfing infinitive does not occur or the perfecting does not occur or both.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the hemalness occurs is not wrong.; sent11 & sent3 -> int4: the hemalness does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the minorness but not the turfing infinitive occurs is incorrect.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the kafkaesqueness does not occur.; sent13 -> int8: the turfing Pitman does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the turfing Pitman does not occur and the kafkaesqueness does not occur.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: that the anonymousness does not occur hold.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__