the fact that the AWOL is a kind of an opportunism is correct.
sent1: the AWOL is an opportunism if the annihilator is an opportunism. sent2: the fact that the annihilator does not lap alder and is an opportunism is not right. sent3: that the AWOL is not an opportunism hold if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a caecilian and laps alder is wrong. sent4: if something is not fatal and it is not a Enhydra it does not lap imperfective. sent5: the annihilator is an opportunism if something does not intrigue felucca and it is not a caecilian. sent6: there is something such that it does intrigue felucca. sent7: everything is not fatal and it is not a kind of a Enhydra. sent8: that that the AWOL is not an opportunism and is a kind of a caecilian is true is false. sent9: that the annihilator is a kind of an opportunism and is a caecilian is not right. sent10: that the annihilator is a kind of non-caecilian thing that laps alder is incorrect if there is something such that it does intrigue felucca. sent11: if something does not lap imperfective it is not evidentiary and it does not specify. sent12: there exists something such that it is not an opportunism and does lap alder. sent13: the fact that the AWOL does intrigue felucca and it is a brewer is not right. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not evidentiary and it does not specify then the distortionist is not proteinaceous. sent15: the opsin laps alder if the steeplechaser does laps alder. sent16: if there is something such that it is not proteinaceous the steeplechaser laps alder but it is not logistic.
sent6 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the annihilator is not a caecilian and laps alder is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not caecilian and it does lap alder does not hold.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the AWOL is an opportunism.
sent4 -> int3: if the lutetium is not fatal and it is not a Enhydra then it does not lap imperfective.; sent7 -> int4: the lutetium is not fatal and is not a Enhydra.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the lutetium does not lap imperfective.; int5 -> int6: everything does not lap imperfective.; int6 -> int7: the crockery does not lap imperfective.; sent11 -> int8: if the crockery does not lap imperfective it is not evidentiary and it does not specify.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the crockery is not evidentiary and does not specify.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not evidentiary and it does not specify.; int10 & sent14 -> int11: the distortionist is not proteinaceous.; int11 -> int12: something is non-proteinaceous.; int12 & sent16 -> int13: the steeplechaser laps alder and is not logistic.; int13 -> int14: the steeplechaser does lap alder.; int14 & sent15 -> int15: the opsin laps alder.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the AWOL is a kind of an opportunism is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the AWOL is an opportunism if the annihilator is an opportunism. sent2: the fact that the annihilator does not lap alder and is an opportunism is not right. sent3: that the AWOL is not an opportunism hold if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a caecilian and laps alder is wrong. sent4: if something is not fatal and it is not a Enhydra it does not lap imperfective. sent5: the annihilator is an opportunism if something does not intrigue felucca and it is not a caecilian. sent6: there is something such that it does intrigue felucca. sent7: everything is not fatal and it is not a kind of a Enhydra. sent8: that that the AWOL is not an opportunism and is a kind of a caecilian is true is false. sent9: that the annihilator is a kind of an opportunism and is a caecilian is not right. sent10: that the annihilator is a kind of non-caecilian thing that laps alder is incorrect if there is something such that it does intrigue felucca. sent11: if something does not lap imperfective it is not evidentiary and it does not specify. sent12: there exists something such that it is not an opportunism and does lap alder. sent13: the fact that the AWOL does intrigue felucca and it is a brewer is not right. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not evidentiary and it does not specify then the distortionist is not proteinaceous. sent15: the opsin laps alder if the steeplechaser does laps alder. sent16: if there is something such that it is not proteinaceous the steeplechaser laps alder but it is not logistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the annihilator is not a caecilian and laps alder is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not caecilian and it does lap alder does not hold.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__