the devolution does not mismanage eigenvalue.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a carbonization and it is not rabbinical is not correct then the progymnosperm does not mismanage eigenvalue. sent2: the devolution does not mismanage eigenvalue if the guardrail is not septic but it is a carbonization. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not protozoal and it is an antiquity does not hold. sent4: that everything is septic is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the progymnosperm is a carbonization that is not septic is wrong. sent6: the devolution is not a carbonization if there is something such that the fact that it does not mismanage eigenvalue and is not rabbinical is not right. sent7: the Carthaginian is not a carbonization. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a carbonization and it does not mismanage eigenvalue is incorrect. sent9: the guardrail is not septic if the progymnosperm is non-rabbinical thing that is not a carbonization. sent10: the guardrail does not mismanage eigenvalue if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-septic and it is not a carbonization does not hold. sent11: everything is a hair. sent12: the progymnosperm does not mismanage eigenvalue and it is not a carbonization.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the progymnosperm is a kind of non-rabbinical thing that is not a carbonization.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the guardrail is not septic.; sent4 -> int2: the guardrail is septic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the progymnosperm is both not rabbinical and not a carbonization is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not rabbinical and not a carbonization is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the devolution does not mismanage eigenvalue. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a carbonization and it is not rabbinical is not correct then the progymnosperm does not mismanage eigenvalue. sent2: the devolution does not mismanage eigenvalue if the guardrail is not septic but it is a carbonization. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not protozoal and it is an antiquity does not hold. sent4: that everything is septic is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the progymnosperm is a carbonization that is not septic is wrong. sent6: the devolution is not a carbonization if there is something such that the fact that it does not mismanage eigenvalue and is not rabbinical is not right. sent7: the Carthaginian is not a carbonization. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a carbonization and it does not mismanage eigenvalue is incorrect. sent9: the guardrail is not septic if the progymnosperm is non-rabbinical thing that is not a carbonization. sent10: the guardrail does not mismanage eigenvalue if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-septic and it is not a carbonization does not hold. sent11: everything is a hair. sent12: the progymnosperm does not mismanage eigenvalue and it is not a carbonization. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the progymnosperm is a kind of non-rabbinical thing that is not a carbonization.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the guardrail is not septic.; sent4 -> int2: the guardrail is septic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the progymnosperm is both not rabbinical and not a carbonization is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not rabbinical and not a carbonization is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__