the fact that both the casualty and the separating happens is not correct.
sent1: the martyrdom happens. sent2: if the non-oncologicalness and the hogging paleoecology occurs then the overleaping does not occur. sent3: the separated occurs. sent4: that the overleaping does not occur and the reconvening does not occur results in the casualty. sent5: both the non-oncologicalness and the hogging paleoecology happens. sent6: the yodeling happens. sent7: the confutation happens if the martyrdom occurs. sent8: the reconvening does not occur if the yodeling occurs and the confutation occurs.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the confutation happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: both the yodeling and the confutation occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the reconvening does not occur.; sent2 & sent5 -> int4: that the overleaping does not occur is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the overleaping does not occur and the reconvening does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the casualty occurs.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the casualty and the separating happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the martyrdom happens. sent2: if the non-oncologicalness and the hogging paleoecology occurs then the overleaping does not occur. sent3: the separated occurs. sent4: that the overleaping does not occur and the reconvening does not occur results in the casualty. sent5: both the non-oncologicalness and the hogging paleoecology happens. sent6: the yodeling happens. sent7: the confutation happens if the martyrdom occurs. sent8: the reconvening does not occur if the yodeling occurs and the confutation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the confutation happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: both the yodeling and the confutation occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the reconvening does not occur.; sent2 & sent5 -> int4: that the overleaping does not occur is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the overleaping does not occur and the reconvening does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the casualty occurs.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__