the tansy is not psychotherapeutic.
sent1: if the tansy is a pantheist then that it is a margarin is not false. sent2: the dandruff is not melodic and is a margarin if that it is psychotherapeutic is right. sent3: the fact that the dandruff is a angelology but it is not a Xenosaurus does not hold. sent4: that the fact that the tansy is not a margarin but a Xenosaurus does not hold hold. sent5: if something is not melodic and/or it is a margarin then it is not psychotherapeutic. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both a angelology and not a Xenosaurus is not right then the tramline does not laud. sent7: if the tansy is a Xenosaurus then it is melodic. sent8: the tramline is a kind of a Octopodidae if that it is a kind of non-carvel-built thing that is sleeveless does not hold. sent9: the tramline is a kind of a margarin. sent10: if the dandruff is not a Octopodidae it is a kind of a angelology. sent11: the Ovulen does not amount if it is not pantheist. sent12: the fact that the tramline is a Octopodidae but it is not a angelology is not true. sent13: if something is non-carvel-built then it is not a kind of a pantheist. sent14: that the tansy is a pantheist if the tramline is a kind of a Octopodidae and does not laud is right. sent15: the tansy is millennial thing that does not roll slack. sent16: something is not a fissure if it is not a kind of a Rundstedt. sent17: there is something such that it is a cadenced and does not roll wool.
sent3 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a angelology and it is not a Xenosaurus is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the tramline does not laud.; sent5 -> int3: the tansy is not psychotherapeutic if it is not melodic and/or it is a margarin.;
the showerhead is pantheist.
$hypothesis$ = the tansy is not psychotherapeutic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tansy is a pantheist then that it is a margarin is not false. sent2: the dandruff is not melodic and is a margarin if that it is psychotherapeutic is right. sent3: the fact that the dandruff is a angelology but it is not a Xenosaurus does not hold. sent4: that the fact that the tansy is not a margarin but a Xenosaurus does not hold hold. sent5: if something is not melodic and/or it is a margarin then it is not psychotherapeutic. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both a angelology and not a Xenosaurus is not right then the tramline does not laud. sent7: if the tansy is a Xenosaurus then it is melodic. sent8: the tramline is a kind of a Octopodidae if that it is a kind of non-carvel-built thing that is sleeveless does not hold. sent9: the tramline is a kind of a margarin. sent10: if the dandruff is not a Octopodidae it is a kind of a angelology. sent11: the Ovulen does not amount if it is not pantheist. sent12: the fact that the tramline is a Octopodidae but it is not a angelology is not true. sent13: if something is non-carvel-built then it is not a kind of a pantheist. sent14: that the tansy is a pantheist if the tramline is a kind of a Octopodidae and does not laud is right. sent15: the tansy is millennial thing that does not roll slack. sent16: something is not a fissure if it is not a kind of a Rundstedt. sent17: there is something such that it is a cadenced and does not roll wool. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a angelology and it is not a Xenosaurus is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the tramline does not laud.; sent5 -> int3: the tansy is not psychotherapeutic if it is not melodic and/or it is a margarin.; __UNKNOWN__