the ratlikeness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the confrontationalness does not occur hold. sent2: the non-life-supportness and the non-contemptibleness happens if the Rorschach does not occur. sent3: the Malianness does not occur if the animatisticness does not occur and the irreversibleness occurs. sent4: that the life-supportness does not occur and the contemptibleness does not occur is not true. sent5: that the homily does not occur triggers that the housing detail happens and the federalizing Dimetapp happens. sent6: both the non-rickettsialness and the Chinook occurs. sent7: the formicness is prevented by that the biquadraticness happens and the bullfighting happens. sent8: the enfeebling authorship does not occur. sent9: if the federalizing Dimetapp does not occur the Rorschach and the ratlikeness happens. sent10: the ratlikeness does not occur if either the batting or the non-academicness or both happens. sent11: the housing detail happens. sent12: either the seamanlikeness or the Cuban or both happens. sent13: the housing criticism does not occur. sent14: the fact that the academicness does not occur is not false if the federalizing Dimetapp occurs and the Rorschach occurs. sent15: the non-life-supportness is triggered by that the Rorschach does not occur. sent16: that the homily happens is prevented by that that the non-rickettsialness and the Chinook happens hold. sent17: that the academicness does not occur and the batting does not occur does not hold if the housing detail does not occur. sent18: the suffering Utopian happens. sent19: either the batting or the academicness or both happens. sent20: the striping occurs. sent21: the fact that the Ravel does not occur is right. sent22: if the fact that the homily happens is not right the housing detail occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Rorschach does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-life-supportness and the non-contemptibleness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Rorschach happens.; sent16 & sent6 -> int4: the homily does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the housing detail happens and the federalizing Dimetapp happens.; int5 -> int6: that the federalizing Dimetapp occurs is true.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the federalizing Dimetapp and the Rorschach happens.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the academicness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the batting and/or the non-academicness happens.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the ratlikeness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the ratlikeness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the confrontationalness does not occur hold. sent2: the non-life-supportness and the non-contemptibleness happens if the Rorschach does not occur. sent3: the Malianness does not occur if the animatisticness does not occur and the irreversibleness occurs. sent4: that the life-supportness does not occur and the contemptibleness does not occur is not true. sent5: that the homily does not occur triggers that the housing detail happens and the federalizing Dimetapp happens. sent6: both the non-rickettsialness and the Chinook occurs. sent7: the formicness is prevented by that the biquadraticness happens and the bullfighting happens. sent8: the enfeebling authorship does not occur. sent9: if the federalizing Dimetapp does not occur the Rorschach and the ratlikeness happens. sent10: the ratlikeness does not occur if either the batting or the non-academicness or both happens. sent11: the housing detail happens. sent12: either the seamanlikeness or the Cuban or both happens. sent13: the housing criticism does not occur. sent14: the fact that the academicness does not occur is not false if the federalizing Dimetapp occurs and the Rorschach occurs. sent15: the non-life-supportness is triggered by that the Rorschach does not occur. sent16: that the homily happens is prevented by that that the non-rickettsialness and the Chinook happens hold. sent17: that the academicness does not occur and the batting does not occur does not hold if the housing detail does not occur. sent18: the suffering Utopian happens. sent19: either the batting or the academicness or both happens. sent20: the striping occurs. sent21: the fact that the Ravel does not occur is right. sent22: if the fact that the homily happens is not right the housing detail occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Rorschach does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-life-supportness and the non-contemptibleness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Rorschach happens.; sent16 & sent6 -> int4: the homily does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the housing detail happens and the federalizing Dimetapp happens.; int5 -> int6: that the federalizing Dimetapp occurs is true.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the federalizing Dimetapp and the Rorschach happens.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the academicness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the batting and/or the non-academicness happens.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__