either the cantala does not stable Libyan or it does not risk quincentennial or both.
sent1: if the Chipewyan is a panhandler then the fact that the cantala either does not stable Libyan or does not risk quincentennial or both does not hold. sent2: that the Chipewyan does not risk boss and is a kind of a trompillo is false. sent3: the fact that the dracontium does risk quincentennial if the dracontium is motivational is not incorrect. sent4: the Chipewyan does risk ormer if the fact that it does not risk boss and it is a trompillo is wrong. sent5: that something is both not a panhandler and not patellar is not true if it does not risk ormer. sent6: if the dracontium is not patellar then it is not non-motivational. sent7: if something is not a panhandler then it is not vagile or it does not stable Libyan or both. sent8: that the dracontium does not risk ormer is not wrong if the myelocyte does not risk ormer but it is penile. sent9: the dracontium is not patellar if either something does risk ormer or it is a kind of a panhandler or both.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the Chipewyan risks ormer.; int1 -> int2: either the Chipewyan risks ormer or it is a panhandler or both.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that either it risks ormer or it is a kind of a panhandler or both.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the dracontium is not patellar.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the dracontium is motivational.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the dracontium risks quincentennial.;
that the cantala either does not stable Libyan or does not risk quincentennial or both is wrong.
sent5 -> int7: if the fact that the dracontium does not risk ormer is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a panhandler and is not patellar is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = either the cantala does not stable Libyan or it does not risk quincentennial or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Chipewyan is a panhandler then the fact that the cantala either does not stable Libyan or does not risk quincentennial or both does not hold. sent2: that the Chipewyan does not risk boss and is a kind of a trompillo is false. sent3: the fact that the dracontium does risk quincentennial if the dracontium is motivational is not incorrect. sent4: the Chipewyan does risk ormer if the fact that it does not risk boss and it is a trompillo is wrong. sent5: that something is both not a panhandler and not patellar is not true if it does not risk ormer. sent6: if the dracontium is not patellar then it is not non-motivational. sent7: if something is not a panhandler then it is not vagile or it does not stable Libyan or both. sent8: that the dracontium does not risk ormer is not wrong if the myelocyte does not risk ormer but it is penile. sent9: the dracontium is not patellar if either something does risk ormer or it is a kind of a panhandler or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the Chipewyan risks ormer.; int1 -> int2: either the Chipewyan risks ormer or it is a panhandler or both.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that either it risks ormer or it is a kind of a panhandler or both.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the dracontium is not patellar.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the dracontium is motivational.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the dracontium risks quincentennial.; __UNKNOWN__