the scofflaw is untraceable.
sent1: that the Reynard is a wave is not wrong. sent2: the Reynard is puritanical. sent3: if the Reynard is traceable then the scofflaw is puritanical. sent4: if something is a kind of non-antiseptic thing that is not a Cystophora then the scofflaw is a kind of a tor. sent5: the Reynard is a kind of a demonstrative and is puritanical if the saurian is not a lumpenproletariat. sent6: the Reynard is puritanical if the saurian is not a kind of a lumpenproletariat. sent7: if the Reynard is a demonstrative then the fact that the scofflaw is traceable is true. sent8: the fact that the saurian is a kind of a demonstrative is true. sent9: the scofflaw is a demonstrative. sent10: that that the saurian is not a crewelwork or learns or both does not hold hold. sent11: the Reynard is a kind of a lumpenproletariat. sent12: if something that is a kind of a tor is a lumpenproletariat then it is not traceable. sent13: the Reynard is not an antiseptic and it is not a Cystophora. sent14: if that the saurian is not traceable is not incorrect the scofflaw is a kind of a lumpenproletariat. sent15: if the Reynard is not a lumpenproletariat the saurian is puritanical. sent16: the scofflaw is a credendum. sent17: something is a somatotype if that it either is not a crewelwork or does learn or both is wrong. sent18: that the saurian is not a kind of a lumpenproletariat is not wrong.
sent5 & sent18 -> int1: the Reynard is a demonstrative and it is puritanical.; int1 -> int2: the Reynard is a demonstrative.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the scofflaw is not traceable.
sent12 -> int3: if the scofflaw is a tor and is a kind of a lumpenproletariat then it is not traceable.; sent13 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not antiseptic and is not a Cystophora.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the scofflaw is a tor.; sent17 -> int6: the saurian is a somatotype if the fact that it is not a crewelwork or it learns or both does not hold.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the saurian is a somatotype.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is a somatotype.;
$hypothesis$ = the scofflaw is untraceable. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Reynard is a wave is not wrong. sent2: the Reynard is puritanical. sent3: if the Reynard is traceable then the scofflaw is puritanical. sent4: if something is a kind of non-antiseptic thing that is not a Cystophora then the scofflaw is a kind of a tor. sent5: the Reynard is a kind of a demonstrative and is puritanical if the saurian is not a lumpenproletariat. sent6: the Reynard is puritanical if the saurian is not a kind of a lumpenproletariat. sent7: if the Reynard is a demonstrative then the fact that the scofflaw is traceable is true. sent8: the fact that the saurian is a kind of a demonstrative is true. sent9: the scofflaw is a demonstrative. sent10: that that the saurian is not a crewelwork or learns or both does not hold hold. sent11: the Reynard is a kind of a lumpenproletariat. sent12: if something that is a kind of a tor is a lumpenproletariat then it is not traceable. sent13: the Reynard is not an antiseptic and it is not a Cystophora. sent14: if that the saurian is not traceable is not incorrect the scofflaw is a kind of a lumpenproletariat. sent15: if the Reynard is not a lumpenproletariat the saurian is puritanical. sent16: the scofflaw is a credendum. sent17: something is a somatotype if that it either is not a crewelwork or does learn or both is wrong. sent18: that the saurian is not a kind of a lumpenproletariat is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent18 -> int1: the Reynard is a demonstrative and it is puritanical.; int1 -> int2: the Reynard is a demonstrative.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__