the fact that the cocooning does not occur hold.
sent1: the reappearance occurs. sent2: if the systole and the reappearance occurs then the slicing keratinization does not occur. sent3: that the cocoon and the liberalizing occurs triggers that the fumbling stentor does not occur. sent4: either the gloriousness happens or the patellarness happens or both if the handicraft does not occur. sent5: that the liberalizing occurs is triggered by that the slicing keratinization does not occur. sent6: that the continuance does not occur causes that the cocoon does not occur or the fumbling stentor occurs or both. sent7: the fumbling FARC occurs. sent8: if the skewing does not occur then that the prevailing and the passerine occurs is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the presence does not occur and the systole happens is not true if the fact that the reappearance does not occur is true. sent10: that the continuance but not the fumbling stentor occurs does not hold if the showing occurs. sent11: if the fact that the presence does not occur and the systole occurs is wrong the presence occurs. sent12: the prevailing does not occur if that that the prevailing happens and the passerine occurs is not false is not correct. sent13: the fact that both the fumbling stentor and the continuance happens is not incorrect. sent14: the handicraft does not occur and the despite does not occur if the prevailing does not occur. sent15: the skewing does not occur if that the usualness happens and the teratogenicness occurs is wrong. sent16: if the gloriousness happens the continuance does not occur and the showing does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the systole does not occur is right then the Botswananness happens and the presence occurs. sent18: the fact that the usualness and the teratogenicness happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cocooning occurs.; sent13 -> int1: the fumbling stentor happens.;
the Botswananness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cocooning does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the reappearance occurs. sent2: if the systole and the reappearance occurs then the slicing keratinization does not occur. sent3: that the cocoon and the liberalizing occurs triggers that the fumbling stentor does not occur. sent4: either the gloriousness happens or the patellarness happens or both if the handicraft does not occur. sent5: that the liberalizing occurs is triggered by that the slicing keratinization does not occur. sent6: that the continuance does not occur causes that the cocoon does not occur or the fumbling stentor occurs or both. sent7: the fumbling FARC occurs. sent8: if the skewing does not occur then that the prevailing and the passerine occurs is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the presence does not occur and the systole happens is not true if the fact that the reappearance does not occur is true. sent10: that the continuance but not the fumbling stentor occurs does not hold if the showing occurs. sent11: if the fact that the presence does not occur and the systole occurs is wrong the presence occurs. sent12: the prevailing does not occur if that that the prevailing happens and the passerine occurs is not false is not correct. sent13: the fact that both the fumbling stentor and the continuance happens is not incorrect. sent14: the handicraft does not occur and the despite does not occur if the prevailing does not occur. sent15: the skewing does not occur if that the usualness happens and the teratogenicness occurs is wrong. sent16: if the gloriousness happens the continuance does not occur and the showing does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the systole does not occur is right then the Botswananness happens and the presence occurs. sent18: the fact that the usualness and the teratogenicness happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cocooning occurs.; sent13 -> int1: the fumbling stentor happens.; __UNKNOWN__