the fact that that the wheeze is not biogenic hold if the fact that the signal is not a dumpiness and recreates is not correct is not true.
sent1: if something does liquefy horse-cart the fact that it is not biogenic is right. sent2: if that something is a kind of a Succoth that does not liquefy horse-cart does not hold then it is not biogenic. sent3: the signal does liquefy horse-cart if it is not a dumpiness and it recreates. sent4: if the wheeze liquefies horse-cart it is not biogenic. sent5: if something is not a Succoth it does not liquefy horse-cart. sent6: if that the signal is not a kind of a dumpiness but it is a kind of a Succoth does not hold then the wheeze does not liquefy horse-cart. sent7: that the wheeze is a kind of a Succoth and it does liquefy horse-cart is false. sent8: the wheeze is not biogenic if the signal does not recreate. sent9: that the wheeze is not biogenic is not incorrect if the signal is not a dumpiness but it recreates. sent10: if the signal does liquefy horse-cart that the wheeze is a Succoth but it does not liquefy horse-cart is not correct. sent11: if the signal does not recreate then it liquefies horse-cart. sent12: if the signal does liquefy horse-cart then the fact that the wheeze is a Succoth and does liquefy horse-cart does not hold. sent13: the fact that the moorage does not recreate and is a highjacker does not hold. sent14: if that the signal is not a kind of a dumpiness but it recreates does not hold it does liquefy horse-cart. sent15: that the wheeze does not raven thwart but it does recreate does not hold. sent16: the fact that something is not a Mutinus hold if the fact that it is unshrinkable and is not a Hohenzollern is not correct. sent17: the Miller is not a Succoth. sent18: if the fact that the fact that the signal is a dumpiness that does recreate is not true hold it liquefies horse-cart.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the signal is not a dumpiness and recreates is wrong.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the signal liquefies horse-cart.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the wheeze is a kind of a Succoth but it does not liquefy horse-cart is not true.; sent2 -> int3: the wheeze is not biogenic if that it is a kind of a Succoth that does not liquefy horse-cart does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the wheeze is not biogenic.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the therapist does not liquefy horse-cart.
sent5 -> int5: the therapist does not liquefy horse-cart if it is not a Succoth.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the wheeze is not biogenic hold if the fact that the signal is not a dumpiness and recreates is not correct is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does liquefy horse-cart the fact that it is not biogenic is right. sent2: if that something is a kind of a Succoth that does not liquefy horse-cart does not hold then it is not biogenic. sent3: the signal does liquefy horse-cart if it is not a dumpiness and it recreates. sent4: if the wheeze liquefies horse-cart it is not biogenic. sent5: if something is not a Succoth it does not liquefy horse-cart. sent6: if that the signal is not a kind of a dumpiness but it is a kind of a Succoth does not hold then the wheeze does not liquefy horse-cart. sent7: that the wheeze is a kind of a Succoth and it does liquefy horse-cart is false. sent8: the wheeze is not biogenic if the signal does not recreate. sent9: that the wheeze is not biogenic is not incorrect if the signal is not a dumpiness but it recreates. sent10: if the signal does liquefy horse-cart that the wheeze is a Succoth but it does not liquefy horse-cart is not correct. sent11: if the signal does not recreate then it liquefies horse-cart. sent12: if the signal does liquefy horse-cart then the fact that the wheeze is a Succoth and does liquefy horse-cart does not hold. sent13: the fact that the moorage does not recreate and is a highjacker does not hold. sent14: if that the signal is not a kind of a dumpiness but it recreates does not hold it does liquefy horse-cart. sent15: that the wheeze does not raven thwart but it does recreate does not hold. sent16: the fact that something is not a Mutinus hold if the fact that it is unshrinkable and is not a Hohenzollern is not correct. sent17: the Miller is not a Succoth. sent18: if the fact that the fact that the signal is a dumpiness that does recreate is not true hold it liquefies horse-cart. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the signal is not a dumpiness and recreates is wrong.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the signal liquefies horse-cart.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the wheeze is a kind of a Succoth but it does not liquefy horse-cart is not true.; sent2 -> int3: the wheeze is not biogenic if that it is a kind of a Succoth that does not liquefy horse-cart does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the wheeze is not biogenic.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__