that the grating is a hippoboscid that comforts grating is right.
sent1: that either the bole does intrude guama or it does not fine-tune or both is wrong. sent2: the grating intrudes endocardium if the fact that the contemporary does not intrudes endocardium and does not comfort grating is not right. sent3: there is something such that it is a geotropism and it is not a filmed. sent4: the grating is a Frankenstein. sent5: the caddy is a kind of a Zeus that swims if the ammobium is not abdominal. sent6: if that the fact that the bole does intrude guama and/or it does not fine-tune hold is wrong that the caravan does fine-tune is correct. sent7: the Benzedrine intrudes endocardium if something is both a geotropism and not a filmed. sent8: if the Benzedrine intrudes endocardium the grating is a hippoboscid. sent9: the fact that the grating fine-tunes hold if it is a Frankenstein. sent10: the ammobium is not an abdominal. sent11: if the caravan is a kind of a Zeus then it is a kind of a Frankenstein. sent12: if the grating does intrude endocardium the Benzedrine does sweeten Jamaican but it is not mensural. sent13: if the caddy is a Zeus then the caravan is a Zeus. sent14: if something fine-tunes then it comforts grating.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the Benzedrine intrudes endocardium.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the grating is a hippoboscid.; sent14 -> int3: if the grating does fine-tune it does comfort grating.; sent9 & sent4 -> int4: the grating fine-tunes.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the grating comforts grating.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
something does sweeten Jamaican but it is not mensural.
sent6 & sent1 -> int6: the caravan fine-tunes.; sent5 & sent10 -> int7: the caddy is a Zeus and it swims.; int7 -> int8: the caddy is a Zeus.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the caravan is a Zeus.; sent11 & int9 -> int10: the caravan is a Frankenstein.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the caravan fine-tunes and is a Frankenstein.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it fine-tunes and it is a Frankenstein.;
$hypothesis$ = that the grating is a hippoboscid that comforts grating is right. ; $context$ = sent1: that either the bole does intrude guama or it does not fine-tune or both is wrong. sent2: the grating intrudes endocardium if the fact that the contemporary does not intrudes endocardium and does not comfort grating is not right. sent3: there is something such that it is a geotropism and it is not a filmed. sent4: the grating is a Frankenstein. sent5: the caddy is a kind of a Zeus that swims if the ammobium is not abdominal. sent6: if that the fact that the bole does intrude guama and/or it does not fine-tune hold is wrong that the caravan does fine-tune is correct. sent7: the Benzedrine intrudes endocardium if something is both a geotropism and not a filmed. sent8: if the Benzedrine intrudes endocardium the grating is a hippoboscid. sent9: the fact that the grating fine-tunes hold if it is a Frankenstein. sent10: the ammobium is not an abdominal. sent11: if the caravan is a kind of a Zeus then it is a kind of a Frankenstein. sent12: if the grating does intrude endocardium the Benzedrine does sweeten Jamaican but it is not mensural. sent13: if the caddy is a Zeus then the caravan is a Zeus. sent14: if something fine-tunes then it comforts grating. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the Benzedrine intrudes endocardium.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the grating is a hippoboscid.; sent14 -> int3: if the grating does fine-tune it does comfort grating.; sent9 & sent4 -> int4: the grating fine-tunes.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the grating comforts grating.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__