the sectarian does not stuff homogeny but it is a kind of a Pokomo.
sent1: The bible narrows transferrin. sent2: the transferrin does stuff homogeny and is not catapultic. sent3: the drake jiggles blow and does narrow drake. sent4: if the rogue does not narrow phenomenology then the transferrin does not narrow bible. sent5: something does not jiggle blow but it is not non-monovalent if it is a vicegerent. sent6: if the transferrin does not narrow phenomenology the fact that the rogue does narrow phenomenology hold. sent7: the rogue narrows chipmunk but it is not a kind of a anticyclone. sent8: the transferrin is a kind of a vicegerent if that the bible is a proprionamide but it does not mythicize is not right. sent9: if the transferrin is a kind of a vicegerent it stuffs homogeny. sent10: that something does not stuff homogeny and is a Pokomo is false if it narrows bible. sent11: the rogue narrows phenomenology and is a Pokomo. sent12: there is something such that it does not mythicize. sent13: the sectarian narrows bible if the transferrin does not narrows bible and it does not jiggle blow. sent14: the borax is not a proprionamide. sent15: the transferrin narrows bible. sent16: the sectarian is a vicegerent and does not mythicize. sent17: if the rogue does narrow phenomenology but it is not monovalent then the sectarian does not stuff homogeny. sent18: That the blow does not jiggle transferrin is incorrect. sent19: if something narrows bible and it does jiggle blow then it does not narrow phenomenology. sent20: the chipmunk illuminates and it stuffs homogeny. sent21: if that something is lean and it does summon is not correct it does not narrow phenomenology. sent22: the sectarian is Bruneian. sent23: if there is something such that the fact that it does not mythicize is true the transferrin is a vicegerent and/or it is a Pokomo. sent24: the rogue does narrow phenomenology. sent25: something is a Pokomo if it is a kind of a vicegerent and it does not mythicize. sent26: that the transferrin does not jiggle blow is incorrect.
sent15 & sent26 -> int1: the transferrin does narrow bible and jiggles blow.; sent19 -> int2: the transferrin does not narrow phenomenology if it narrows bible and jiggles blow.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the transferrin does not narrow phenomenology.; sent25 -> int4: if the sectarian is a vicegerent but it does not mythicize then it is a Pokomo.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the sectarian is a Pokomo.;
the fact that the sectarian does not stuff homogeny and is a Pokomo is wrong.
sent10 -> int6: if that the sectarian narrows bible is not incorrect then the fact that it does not stuff homogeny and it is a Pokomo is incorrect.; sent21 -> int7: if that the rogue is lean and it summons is not correct it does not narrow phenomenology.; sent5 -> int8: if the transferrin is a vicegerent it does not jiggle blow and is monovalent.; sent14 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a kind of a proprionamide.;
$hypothesis$ = the sectarian does not stuff homogeny but it is a kind of a Pokomo. ; $context$ = sent1: The bible narrows transferrin. sent2: the transferrin does stuff homogeny and is not catapultic. sent3: the drake jiggles blow and does narrow drake. sent4: if the rogue does not narrow phenomenology then the transferrin does not narrow bible. sent5: something does not jiggle blow but it is not non-monovalent if it is a vicegerent. sent6: if the transferrin does not narrow phenomenology the fact that the rogue does narrow phenomenology hold. sent7: the rogue narrows chipmunk but it is not a kind of a anticyclone. sent8: the transferrin is a kind of a vicegerent if that the bible is a proprionamide but it does not mythicize is not right. sent9: if the transferrin is a kind of a vicegerent it stuffs homogeny. sent10: that something does not stuff homogeny and is a Pokomo is false if it narrows bible. sent11: the rogue narrows phenomenology and is a Pokomo. sent12: there is something such that it does not mythicize. sent13: the sectarian narrows bible if the transferrin does not narrows bible and it does not jiggle blow. sent14: the borax is not a proprionamide. sent15: the transferrin narrows bible. sent16: the sectarian is a vicegerent and does not mythicize. sent17: if the rogue does narrow phenomenology but it is not monovalent then the sectarian does not stuff homogeny. sent18: That the blow does not jiggle transferrin is incorrect. sent19: if something narrows bible and it does jiggle blow then it does not narrow phenomenology. sent20: the chipmunk illuminates and it stuffs homogeny. sent21: if that something is lean and it does summon is not correct it does not narrow phenomenology. sent22: the sectarian is Bruneian. sent23: if there is something such that the fact that it does not mythicize is true the transferrin is a vicegerent and/or it is a Pokomo. sent24: the rogue does narrow phenomenology. sent25: something is a Pokomo if it is a kind of a vicegerent and it does not mythicize. sent26: that the transferrin does not jiggle blow is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent26 -> int1: the transferrin does narrow bible and jiggles blow.; sent19 -> int2: the transferrin does not narrow phenomenology if it narrows bible and jiggles blow.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the transferrin does not narrow phenomenology.; sent25 -> int4: if the sectarian is a vicegerent but it does not mythicize then it is a Pokomo.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the sectarian is a Pokomo.; __UNKNOWN__