the canvasback jets fund.
sent1: the shaker is not a wetness if the glycerite is uncommon and it does board nanosecond. sent2: the fact that something jets fund and is not a telco is false if it is common. sent3: if the fact that the fact that the saguaro does ferret and is not a telco is not wrong is wrong then the clocksmith does not jet fund. sent4: the shaker does go if the clocksmith does board nylon. sent5: if something is a kind of a bun then that it is a mullioned is not false. sent6: something is a kind of nonhuman thing that does board dukedom if it is a diarchy. sent7: the fact that something is not a wetness and it does not ferret is not true if it is not worthy. sent8: the shaker is a keyboard. sent9: if the saguaro is a keyboard the shaker is a kind of a keyboard. sent10: the glycerite is not a kind of a worthy if there exists something such that it boards dukedom and is a keyboard. sent11: if the feline does not board nanosecond the canvasback is a kind of non-uncommon thing that is not a telco. sent12: if the feline is not a kind of a telco that the saguaro is a ferret and is not a telco is not true. sent13: if something is a mullioned then it is a kind of a keyboard. sent14: if the shaker is not human it is a keyboard. sent15: if the homespun boards nanosecond then the fact that the glycerite does boards nanosecond is not false. sent16: the saguaro is a bun if there is something such that that it is a Cockney and it is not a kind of a bun is wrong. sent17: the glycerite is uncommon if the feline is a kind of a telco. sent18: something is a diarchy if it is a kind of a go. sent19: the shaker is not human. sent20: if that something is not a telco and not common is not right then it is not a diarchy. sent21: the shaker does board dukedom. sent22: the shaker is a wetness and it is a kind of a keyboard if it is not human. sent23: that the canvasback jets fund and does board dukedom if that the clocksmith does not jets fund hold is not false. sent24: if the fact that something is ontological is not incorrect then the clocksmith does board nylon and/or it is a go. sent25: something does not jet fund if it is not uncommon and it is not a telco. sent26: the fact that the homespun is both a Cockney and not a bun is wrong. sent27: the canvasback is not a keyboard. sent28: something is ontological. sent29: if the homespun is a worthy that the glycerite does board nanosecond is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the feline is a kind of a telco.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the glycerite is uncommon.; sent22 & sent19 -> int2: the shaker is a wetness and it is a kind of a keyboard.; int2 -> int3: the shaker is a wetness.;
that the homeotherm is a kind of a diarchy that does not board dukedom is not true.
sent20 -> int4: if the fact that the feline is not a kind of a telco but it is uncommon is wrong it is not a diarchy.;
$hypothesis$ = the canvasback jets fund. ; $context$ = sent1: the shaker is not a wetness if the glycerite is uncommon and it does board nanosecond. sent2: the fact that something jets fund and is not a telco is false if it is common. sent3: if the fact that the fact that the saguaro does ferret and is not a telco is not wrong is wrong then the clocksmith does not jet fund. sent4: the shaker does go if the clocksmith does board nylon. sent5: if something is a kind of a bun then that it is a mullioned is not false. sent6: something is a kind of nonhuman thing that does board dukedom if it is a diarchy. sent7: the fact that something is not a wetness and it does not ferret is not true if it is not worthy. sent8: the shaker is a keyboard. sent9: if the saguaro is a keyboard the shaker is a kind of a keyboard. sent10: the glycerite is not a kind of a worthy if there exists something such that it boards dukedom and is a keyboard. sent11: if the feline does not board nanosecond the canvasback is a kind of non-uncommon thing that is not a telco. sent12: if the feline is not a kind of a telco that the saguaro is a ferret and is not a telco is not true. sent13: if something is a mullioned then it is a kind of a keyboard. sent14: if the shaker is not human it is a keyboard. sent15: if the homespun boards nanosecond then the fact that the glycerite does boards nanosecond is not false. sent16: the saguaro is a bun if there is something such that that it is a Cockney and it is not a kind of a bun is wrong. sent17: the glycerite is uncommon if the feline is a kind of a telco. sent18: something is a diarchy if it is a kind of a go. sent19: the shaker is not human. sent20: if that something is not a telco and not common is not right then it is not a diarchy. sent21: the shaker does board dukedom. sent22: the shaker is a wetness and it is a kind of a keyboard if it is not human. sent23: that the canvasback jets fund and does board dukedom if that the clocksmith does not jets fund hold is not false. sent24: if the fact that something is ontological is not incorrect then the clocksmith does board nylon and/or it is a go. sent25: something does not jet fund if it is not uncommon and it is not a telco. sent26: the fact that the homespun is both a Cockney and not a bun is wrong. sent27: the canvasback is not a keyboard. sent28: something is ontological. sent29: if the homespun is a worthy that the glycerite does board nanosecond is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the feline is a kind of a telco.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the glycerite is uncommon.; sent22 & sent19 -> int2: the shaker is a wetness and it is a kind of a keyboard.; int2 -> int3: the shaker is a wetness.; __UNKNOWN__