the attache does not shatter plagiarism.
sent1: something does not crystallize Balkan if it is not a Yuma. sent2: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Yuma. sent3: the Gnostic is not a Yuma and/or it is not prismatic if there is something such that it is not a Yuma. sent4: the bloater is neurogenic and/or it is not a Yuma. sent5: there exists something such that it shatters plagiarism. sent6: if the Gnostic does not crystallize Balkan the bloater is not neurogenic or it does not crystallize Balkan or both. sent7: if the fact that the life-of-man is neurogenic hold the fact that the bloater crystallizes Balkan or does not shatter plagiarism or both does not hold. sent8: the Gnostic is a Yuma or not prismatic or both. sent9: if the incisor does not shatter category the life-of-man does not crystallize Balkan and/or suppurates. sent10: the bloater is not neurogenic and/or it does crystallize Balkan. sent11: that the attache shatters plagiarism hold if the bloater is not neurogenic or it does not crystallize Balkan or both. sent12: either the bloater is not neurogenic or it does crystallize Balkan or both if the Gnostic does not crystallize Balkan. sent13: the bloater does not shatter plagiarism if it does not crystallize Balkan and/or it is non-prismatic. sent14: that something does not crystallize Balkan hold if either it is not a Yuma or it is not prismatic or both. sent15: if the fact that the bloater does crystallize Balkan and/or does not shatter plagiarism is not true then that the attache does not shatter plagiarism is not false.
sent14 -> int1: the Gnostic does not crystallize Balkan if it is not a Yuma and/or it is not prismatic.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the Gnostic is either not a Yuma or not prismatic or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Gnostic does not crystallize Balkan is not wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the bloater is not neurogenic and/or it does not crystallize Balkan.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the attache does not shatter plagiarism.
$hypothesis$ = the attache does not shatter plagiarism. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not crystallize Balkan if it is not a Yuma. sent2: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Yuma. sent3: the Gnostic is not a Yuma and/or it is not prismatic if there is something such that it is not a Yuma. sent4: the bloater is neurogenic and/or it is not a Yuma. sent5: there exists something such that it shatters plagiarism. sent6: if the Gnostic does not crystallize Balkan the bloater is not neurogenic or it does not crystallize Balkan or both. sent7: if the fact that the life-of-man is neurogenic hold the fact that the bloater crystallizes Balkan or does not shatter plagiarism or both does not hold. sent8: the Gnostic is a Yuma or not prismatic or both. sent9: if the incisor does not shatter category the life-of-man does not crystallize Balkan and/or suppurates. sent10: the bloater is not neurogenic and/or it does crystallize Balkan. sent11: that the attache shatters plagiarism hold if the bloater is not neurogenic or it does not crystallize Balkan or both. sent12: either the bloater is not neurogenic or it does crystallize Balkan or both if the Gnostic does not crystallize Balkan. sent13: the bloater does not shatter plagiarism if it does not crystallize Balkan and/or it is non-prismatic. sent14: that something does not crystallize Balkan hold if either it is not a Yuma or it is not prismatic or both. sent15: if the fact that the bloater does crystallize Balkan and/or does not shatter plagiarism is not true then that the attache does not shatter plagiarism is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the Gnostic does not crystallize Balkan if it is not a Yuma and/or it is not prismatic.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the Gnostic is either not a Yuma or not prismatic or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Gnostic does not crystallize Balkan is not wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the bloater is not neurogenic and/or it does not crystallize Balkan.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__