the deal does stale H.
sent1: if something that is opposable is a champerty then the deal is not a gorgerin. sent2: if there exists something such that that that it is not conspicuous and it is non-bright is correct is false then the handle is non-bright. sent3: the valet is not a fruiterer and it does not reign elephant's-foot. sent4: the valet is not a fruiterer. sent5: the hemoglobin is not a fruiterer. sent6: the fact that the valet does not reign elephant's-foot but it does reign quarterfinal does not hold. sent7: something does not stale primness and it is not syllogistic if it is not thallophytic. sent8: if the deal is a kind of non-bright thing that is not a fruiterer then it does not stale H. sent9: something is not a gorgerin if it does smash Bryum and it is not pure. sent10: if something is bright the deal is not a fruiterer and/or is not pure. sent11: if the valet is both not a gorgerin and not pure then the deal is not a fruiterer. sent12: something is not a gorgerin and it is not pure if it does not smash Bryum. sent13: if there is something such that it does not smash Trotsky then that the bisexuality is not conspicuous and it is not bright is not correct. sent14: the bestiality is a kind of opposable thing that is a kind of a champerty. sent15: something is not bright if that it is not pure and it stales H is not right. sent16: something does stale H if it is not a gorgerin and it does smash Bryum. sent17: the deal does not reign quarterfinal. sent18: the deal does not smash Bryum if the valet is not bright and does not reign quarterfinal. sent19: the deal is not bright. sent20: if the fact that something does not reign elephant's-foot but it reigns quarterfinal is not correct it does not smash Bryum. sent21: there exists something such that it does not smash Trotsky. sent22: if the handle is a gorgerin the fact that the deal stales H is not false.
sent20 -> int1: the valet does not smash Bryum if that it does not reign elephant's-foot and reigns quarterfinal does not hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the valet does not smash Bryum.; sent12 -> int3: the valet is both not a gorgerin and not pure if it does not smash Bryum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the valet is not a gorgerin and not pure.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the deal is not a fruiterer.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the deal is non-bright thing that is not a kind of a fruiterer.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the deal stales H.
sent16 -> int7: if the deal is not a gorgerin but it does smash Bryum then it stales H.; sent14 -> int8: there is something such that it is both not unopposable and a champerty.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the deal is not a gorgerin.; sent21 & sent13 -> int10: that the bisexuality is both not conspicuous and non-bright is incorrect.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not conspicuous and it is not bright is not correct.; int11 & sent2 -> int12: the handle is bright.; int12 -> int13: something is bright.; int13 & sent10 -> int14: the deal is not a fruiterer and/or it is not pure.;
$hypothesis$ = the deal does stale H. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is opposable is a champerty then the deal is not a gorgerin. sent2: if there exists something such that that that it is not conspicuous and it is non-bright is correct is false then the handle is non-bright. sent3: the valet is not a fruiterer and it does not reign elephant's-foot. sent4: the valet is not a fruiterer. sent5: the hemoglobin is not a fruiterer. sent6: the fact that the valet does not reign elephant's-foot but it does reign quarterfinal does not hold. sent7: something does not stale primness and it is not syllogistic if it is not thallophytic. sent8: if the deal is a kind of non-bright thing that is not a fruiterer then it does not stale H. sent9: something is not a gorgerin if it does smash Bryum and it is not pure. sent10: if something is bright the deal is not a fruiterer and/or is not pure. sent11: if the valet is both not a gorgerin and not pure then the deal is not a fruiterer. sent12: something is not a gorgerin and it is not pure if it does not smash Bryum. sent13: if there is something such that it does not smash Trotsky then that the bisexuality is not conspicuous and it is not bright is not correct. sent14: the bestiality is a kind of opposable thing that is a kind of a champerty. sent15: something is not bright if that it is not pure and it stales H is not right. sent16: something does stale H if it is not a gorgerin and it does smash Bryum. sent17: the deal does not reign quarterfinal. sent18: the deal does not smash Bryum if the valet is not bright and does not reign quarterfinal. sent19: the deal is not bright. sent20: if the fact that something does not reign elephant's-foot but it reigns quarterfinal is not correct it does not smash Bryum. sent21: there exists something such that it does not smash Trotsky. sent22: if the handle is a gorgerin the fact that the deal stales H is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the valet does not smash Bryum if that it does not reign elephant's-foot and reigns quarterfinal does not hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the valet does not smash Bryum.; sent12 -> int3: the valet is both not a gorgerin and not pure if it does not smash Bryum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the valet is not a gorgerin and not pure.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the deal is not a fruiterer.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the deal is non-bright thing that is not a kind of a fruiterer.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__