the fact that the rounder is an association is correct.
sent1: if that the trophotropism is not non-lacustrine is not incorrect the jungle is submersible. sent2: that the jungle does not subtilize parenthetical and is submersible is wrong. sent3: a fresh thing abuses. sent4: the jungle does blur if it does subtilize sackbut. sent5: the trophotropism is lacustrine if the fact that the fact that the di-iodotyrosine is not fresh but it is dysgenics is not right hold. sent6: the di-iodotyrosine is dysgenics. sent7: if the longitude is a pavement it is a kind of a triumvirate. sent8: the fact that the di-iodotyrosine is a kind of non-fresh thing that is dysgenics does not hold if the longitude is a kind of a triumvirate. sent9: that the rounder is not a kind of a triumvirate but it is a kind of an association is incorrect. sent10: the di-iodotyrosine does not subtilize parenthetical. sent11: if the longitude is not a pavement and does subtilize sackbut then the rounder is a kind of an abused. sent12: if something abuses it is a kind of an association. sent13: The sackbut subtilizes longitude. sent14: if the longitude is a kind of an abused it does subtilize sackbut. sent15: the longitude subtilizes sackbut. sent16: that the trophotropism is lacustrine is right if the di-iodotyrosine is not dysgenics. sent17: the fact that the longitude is an association and a pavement does not hold if it is not a triumvirate. sent18: if the rounder is both not dysgenics and a submersible the jungle is a kind of an association. sent19: if that the jungle does not subtilize parenthetical but it is an association is wrong it is not a kind of an association.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the longitude is a pavement.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the longitude is a triumvirate.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the di-iodotyrosine is not fresh but dysgenics does not hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the trophotropism is lacustrine.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the jungle is a kind of a submersible is not incorrect.; sent12 -> int5: if the rounder is an abused then the fact that it is a kind of an association is correct.;
the rounder is not an association.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the rounder is an association is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the trophotropism is not non-lacustrine is not incorrect the jungle is submersible. sent2: that the jungle does not subtilize parenthetical and is submersible is wrong. sent3: a fresh thing abuses. sent4: the jungle does blur if it does subtilize sackbut. sent5: the trophotropism is lacustrine if the fact that the fact that the di-iodotyrosine is not fresh but it is dysgenics is not right hold. sent6: the di-iodotyrosine is dysgenics. sent7: if the longitude is a pavement it is a kind of a triumvirate. sent8: the fact that the di-iodotyrosine is a kind of non-fresh thing that is dysgenics does not hold if the longitude is a kind of a triumvirate. sent9: that the rounder is not a kind of a triumvirate but it is a kind of an association is incorrect. sent10: the di-iodotyrosine does not subtilize parenthetical. sent11: if the longitude is not a pavement and does subtilize sackbut then the rounder is a kind of an abused. sent12: if something abuses it is a kind of an association. sent13: The sackbut subtilizes longitude. sent14: if the longitude is a kind of an abused it does subtilize sackbut. sent15: the longitude subtilizes sackbut. sent16: that the trophotropism is lacustrine is right if the di-iodotyrosine is not dysgenics. sent17: the fact that the longitude is an association and a pavement does not hold if it is not a triumvirate. sent18: if the rounder is both not dysgenics and a submersible the jungle is a kind of an association. sent19: if that the jungle does not subtilize parenthetical but it is an association is wrong it is not a kind of an association. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the longitude is a pavement.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the longitude is a triumvirate.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the di-iodotyrosine is not fresh but dysgenics does not hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the trophotropism is lacustrine.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the jungle is a kind of a submersible is not incorrect.; sent12 -> int5: if the rounder is an abused then the fact that it is a kind of an association is correct.; __UNKNOWN__