the pince-nez is an inhalant.
sent1: the pomfret does not nuzzle if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a census and not nacreous does not hold. sent2: the fact that the pomfret does not nuzzle and it is not nacreous does not hold if it is not a census. sent3: if the pince-nez is not inhalant the fact that it does not nuzzle and is not a census is not correct. sent4: if there is something such that it does nuzzle the pince-nez is not an inhalant. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a census then the pomfret does not nuzzle. sent6: the pomfret does not become court. sent7: the fact that the pomfret does nuzzle and is not nacreous is not true. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it does nuzzle and it is not nacreous is not right. sent9: the pomfret is not a census. sent10: there is something such that it does not nuzzle and is not nacreous. sent11: the heliosphere is not a census if it is not an inhalant. sent12: something is caruncular or it is not an inhalant or both if it does become secularization. sent13: if something is caruncular the fact that it is not a census is not wrong. sent14: the pince-nez is not an inhalant if there is something such that that it does not nuzzle and it is not nacreous is not true. sent15: there is something such that that it does not nuzzle and it is nacreous is false. sent16: that the pomfret nuzzles and is non-nacreous is not correct if it is not a census. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not non-nacreous and not a census is not correct.
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the pomfret does not nuzzle and is not nacreous is not true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not nuzzle and is not nacreous does not hold.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
that the heliosphere is a kind of non-planetal thing that is not nacreous is false.
sent13 -> int3: the heliosphere is not a census if the fact that it is not caruncular is not correct.; sent12 -> int4: the pomfret is caruncular and/or it is not an inhalant if the fact that it does become secularization is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the pince-nez is an inhalant. ; $context$ = sent1: the pomfret does not nuzzle if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a census and not nacreous does not hold. sent2: the fact that the pomfret does not nuzzle and it is not nacreous does not hold if it is not a census. sent3: if the pince-nez is not inhalant the fact that it does not nuzzle and is not a census is not correct. sent4: if there is something such that it does nuzzle the pince-nez is not an inhalant. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a census then the pomfret does not nuzzle. sent6: the pomfret does not become court. sent7: the fact that the pomfret does nuzzle and is not nacreous is not true. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it does nuzzle and it is not nacreous is not right. sent9: the pomfret is not a census. sent10: there is something such that it does not nuzzle and is not nacreous. sent11: the heliosphere is not a census if it is not an inhalant. sent12: something is caruncular or it is not an inhalant or both if it does become secularization. sent13: if something is caruncular the fact that it is not a census is not wrong. sent14: the pince-nez is not an inhalant if there is something such that that it does not nuzzle and it is not nacreous is not true. sent15: there is something such that that it does not nuzzle and it is nacreous is false. sent16: that the pomfret nuzzles and is non-nacreous is not correct if it is not a census. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not non-nacreous and not a census is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the pomfret does not nuzzle and is not nacreous is not true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not nuzzle and is not nacreous does not hold.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__