the monotheist does not deflate parcellation.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not azonal. sent2: the monotheist is a acatalectic. sent3: the monotheist does not people if a non-philatelic thing is not monaural. sent4: there is something such that that it is not a hopelessness and is a tetri is false. sent5: if the countertop is both non-acatalectic and not a regular then the monotheist does not deflate parcellation. sent6: that the monotheist is not regular but it does deflate parcellation is not right if there is something such that it is not shorts. sent7: the cotoneaster does not people if it is not monaural and not philatelic. sent8: the countertop is not a acatalectic and it is not a regular if the descender is not a kind of a shorts. sent9: if the cotoneaster is not a peoples the leatherjacket is effective but it is not shorts. sent10: if something is not a bookworm then it is both not monaural and not philatelic. sent11: the fact that the monotheist deflates parcellation and is a kind of a regular is not true. sent12: the descender is not a shorts if the leatherjacket is both effective and not a shorts. sent13: that the monotheist is not effective but it is shorts is incorrect if it is not a peoples. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a regular and it is a kind of a shorts is incorrect then the monotheist does deflate parcellation. sent15: the fact that the countertop is not a regular but it is shorts is not true if there exists something such that it is non-acatalectic. sent16: there is something such that that it is not a regular and it deflates parcellation does not hold. sent17: there is something such that that it deflates parcellation and it is a kind of a shorts is not true. sent18: if something does slag condensation then the monotheist is a regular. sent19: there are acatalectic things. sent20: that the countertop is non-shorts thing that is a kind of a regular is not correct if there exists something such that it does not deflate parcellation. sent21: the descender is not philatelic and it is not monaural. sent22: there is something such that it is non-acatalectic.
sent22 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the countertop is irregular and is a shorts does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not regular and is a shorts does not hold.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the monotheist does not deflate parcellation.
sent10 -> int3: the cotoneaster is both non-monaural and not philatelic if that it is not a kind of a bookworm is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the monotheist does not deflate parcellation. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not azonal. sent2: the monotheist is a acatalectic. sent3: the monotheist does not people if a non-philatelic thing is not monaural. sent4: there is something such that that it is not a hopelessness and is a tetri is false. sent5: if the countertop is both non-acatalectic and not a regular then the monotheist does not deflate parcellation. sent6: that the monotheist is not regular but it does deflate parcellation is not right if there is something such that it is not shorts. sent7: the cotoneaster does not people if it is not monaural and not philatelic. sent8: the countertop is not a acatalectic and it is not a regular if the descender is not a kind of a shorts. sent9: if the cotoneaster is not a peoples the leatherjacket is effective but it is not shorts. sent10: if something is not a bookworm then it is both not monaural and not philatelic. sent11: the fact that the monotheist deflates parcellation and is a kind of a regular is not true. sent12: the descender is not a shorts if the leatherjacket is both effective and not a shorts. sent13: that the monotheist is not effective but it is shorts is incorrect if it is not a peoples. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a regular and it is a kind of a shorts is incorrect then the monotheist does deflate parcellation. sent15: the fact that the countertop is not a regular but it is shorts is not true if there exists something such that it is non-acatalectic. sent16: there is something such that that it is not a regular and it deflates parcellation does not hold. sent17: there is something such that that it deflates parcellation and it is a kind of a shorts is not true. sent18: if something does slag condensation then the monotheist is a regular. sent19: there are acatalectic things. sent20: that the countertop is non-shorts thing that is a kind of a regular is not correct if there exists something such that it does not deflate parcellation. sent21: the descender is not philatelic and it is not monaural. sent22: there is something such that it is non-acatalectic. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the countertop is irregular and is a shorts does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not regular and is a shorts does not hold.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__