the fact that the nature is both not a booming and indigestible is false.
sent1: the gadabout red-eyes and it is a kind of a diplomate. sent2: something is not allophonic if it is not a kind of a love-song and it is non-immobile. sent3: that the swimsuit is not a virtue but it is jittery is incorrect. sent4: The Quito lunches swimsuit. sent5: the swimsuit is not a love-song if that the pumpernickel is both a love-song and subatomic is not right. sent6: if that the child does not ail but it is a disciple is incorrect the sociolinguist is not a disciple. sent7: the swimsuit is a kind of a virtue if that the nature is jittery and it does lunch Quito hold. sent8: the swimsuit lunches Quito. sent9: something is not Yugoslavian if the fact that it is not allophonic and it is jittery is incorrect. sent10: if the brickwork is immobile and not a love-song then the nature is a virtue. sent11: the nature is not a kind of a booming but it is indigestible if it is a virtue. sent12: the brickwork is not a Modicon if the sociolinguist is not a disciple. sent13: something is not Yugoslavian if it is non-jittery. sent14: the swimsuit is not a kind of a Modicon if the brickwork is not a Modicon. sent15: the fact that something is not a booming and is indigestible does not hold if it does not lunch Quito. sent16: that something is a love-song and it is subatomic is not correct if it does not red-eye. sent17: something is not immobile but it is a virtue if it is not a Modicon. sent18: if the swimsuit is a kind of jittery thing that is Yugoslavian the nature does not lunch Quito. sent19: if the fact that the swimsuit is jittery is right then the fact that the pumpernickel is not allophonic and not jittery is wrong. sent20: if that something is non-Yugoslavian thing that is jittery is not true then it does not boom. sent21: the fact that the phonebook is not a booming but it does paganize partygoer is not right. sent22: the roughleg is not non-immobile. sent23: if the pumpernickel is not Yugoslavian then the brickwork is immobile but it is not a kind of a love-song. sent24: the swimsuit is jittery if it lunches Quito. sent25: the pumpernickel is not a booming if the fact that it is non-immobile thing that is jittery does not hold. sent26: something that is not allophonic is a kind of jittery thing that is Yugoslavian. sent27: the nature is Yugoslavian. sent28: the pumpernickel does not red-eye if the gadabout does red-eye and it is a diplomate.
sent24 & sent8 -> int1: the swimsuit is jittery.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the pumpernickel is not allophonic but it is jittery is not correct.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the pumpernickel is non-allophonic and jittery is not right it is not Yugoslavian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pumpernickel is not Yugoslavian.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the brickwork is immobile and is not a love-song.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the nature is a virtue.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the nature does not boom but it is indigestible is incorrect.
sent15 -> int7: the fact that the nature is not a booming and is indigestible is not true if it does not lunch Quito.; sent26 -> int8: the swimsuit is jittery and is Yugoslavian if it is not allophonic.; sent2 -> int9: the swimsuit is not allophonic if it is not a love-song and it is not immobile.; sent16 -> int10: if the pumpernickel does not red-eye the fact that it is a love-song and is subatomic is false.; sent28 & sent1 -> int11: the pumpernickel does not red-eye.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the pumpernickel is a kind of a love-song and it is subatomic does not hold.; sent5 & int12 -> int13: the swimsuit is not a love-song.; sent17 -> int14: if the swimsuit is not a Modicon then it is a kind of non-immobile thing that is a virtue.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the nature is both not a booming and indigestible is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the gadabout red-eyes and it is a kind of a diplomate. sent2: something is not allophonic if it is not a kind of a love-song and it is non-immobile. sent3: that the swimsuit is not a virtue but it is jittery is incorrect. sent4: The Quito lunches swimsuit. sent5: the swimsuit is not a love-song if that the pumpernickel is both a love-song and subatomic is not right. sent6: if that the child does not ail but it is a disciple is incorrect the sociolinguist is not a disciple. sent7: the swimsuit is a kind of a virtue if that the nature is jittery and it does lunch Quito hold. sent8: the swimsuit lunches Quito. sent9: something is not Yugoslavian if the fact that it is not allophonic and it is jittery is incorrect. sent10: if the brickwork is immobile and not a love-song then the nature is a virtue. sent11: the nature is not a kind of a booming but it is indigestible if it is a virtue. sent12: the brickwork is not a Modicon if the sociolinguist is not a disciple. sent13: something is not Yugoslavian if it is non-jittery. sent14: the swimsuit is not a kind of a Modicon if the brickwork is not a Modicon. sent15: the fact that something is not a booming and is indigestible does not hold if it does not lunch Quito. sent16: that something is a love-song and it is subatomic is not correct if it does not red-eye. sent17: something is not immobile but it is a virtue if it is not a Modicon. sent18: if the swimsuit is a kind of jittery thing that is Yugoslavian the nature does not lunch Quito. sent19: if the fact that the swimsuit is jittery is right then the fact that the pumpernickel is not allophonic and not jittery is wrong. sent20: if that something is non-Yugoslavian thing that is jittery is not true then it does not boom. sent21: the fact that the phonebook is not a booming but it does paganize partygoer is not right. sent22: the roughleg is not non-immobile. sent23: if the pumpernickel is not Yugoslavian then the brickwork is immobile but it is not a kind of a love-song. sent24: the swimsuit is jittery if it lunches Quito. sent25: the pumpernickel is not a booming if the fact that it is non-immobile thing that is jittery does not hold. sent26: something that is not allophonic is a kind of jittery thing that is Yugoslavian. sent27: the nature is Yugoslavian. sent28: the pumpernickel does not red-eye if the gadabout does red-eye and it is a diplomate. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent8 -> int1: the swimsuit is jittery.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the pumpernickel is not allophonic but it is jittery is not correct.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the pumpernickel is non-allophonic and jittery is not right it is not Yugoslavian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pumpernickel is not Yugoslavian.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the brickwork is immobile and is not a love-song.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the nature is a virtue.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__