that the adulterant stints Moron and is Napoleonic is not right.
sent1: that the neuron is both a Saratoga and not acidimetric is false. sent2: the fact that the pawpaw is not tetragonal and is a quiche is not right. sent3: if the fact that something is calyptrate but it is not a Saratoga is wrong it is not acidimetric. sent4: the neuron mopes and it is a skateboarder. sent5: the adulterant is not sigmoid if the fact that the neuron is a Saratoga but it is not acidimetric does not hold. sent6: if something is not acidimetric then the fact that it is sigmoid thing that does not lighten is wrong. sent7: the fact that the adulterant is a Jordanian but it is not a Saratoga is not true. sent8: the viscountess does wrestle fastidiousness if there is something such that that it is non-tetragonal thing that is a quiche does not hold. sent9: if something is not sigmoid then it stints Moron and is Napoleonic. sent10: the fact that something is calyptrate and is not a kind of a Saratoga is incorrect if it is a Remus.
sent9 -> int1: if the adulterant is non-sigmoid then it stints Moron and it is Napoleonic.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the adulterant is not sigmoid.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the neuron is sigmoid but it does not lighten is incorrect.
sent6 -> int3: if the neuron is non-acidimetric then that that it is sigmoid and it does not lighten is not wrong is not true.; sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the neuron is calyptrate thing that is not a Saratoga is not right it is not acidimetric.; sent10 -> int5: if the neuron is a Remus then the fact that it is a kind of calyptrate thing that is not a Saratoga is false.; sent2 -> int6: there is something such that that it is not tetragonal and is a kind of a quiche is not true.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the viscountess does not wrestle fastidiousness is not right.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it does wrestle fastidiousness.;
$hypothesis$ = that the adulterant stints Moron and is Napoleonic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the neuron is both a Saratoga and not acidimetric is false. sent2: the fact that the pawpaw is not tetragonal and is a quiche is not right. sent3: if the fact that something is calyptrate but it is not a Saratoga is wrong it is not acidimetric. sent4: the neuron mopes and it is a skateboarder. sent5: the adulterant is not sigmoid if the fact that the neuron is a Saratoga but it is not acidimetric does not hold. sent6: if something is not acidimetric then the fact that it is sigmoid thing that does not lighten is wrong. sent7: the fact that the adulterant is a Jordanian but it is not a Saratoga is not true. sent8: the viscountess does wrestle fastidiousness if there is something such that that it is non-tetragonal thing that is a quiche does not hold. sent9: if something is not sigmoid then it stints Moron and is Napoleonic. sent10: the fact that something is calyptrate and is not a kind of a Saratoga is incorrect if it is a Remus. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the adulterant is non-sigmoid then it stints Moron and it is Napoleonic.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the adulterant is not sigmoid.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__