if the restlessness does not occur both the empiricalness and the relevantness occurs.
sent1: the empiricalness happens if the restlessness does not occur. sent2: the relevantness occurs if the fact that the aureole does not occur and the relevantness does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the embrowning balanced does not occur then both the uptick and the radioimmunoassay happens. sent4: if the apprehension does not occur then that either the beats or the incontinentness or both occurs does not hold. sent5: the fact that the fact that the aureole does not occur and the relevantness does not occur is correct is not right. sent6: if the fact that the beats occurs and/or the incontinentness happens is not right the stowing villager does not occur. sent7: if the cadetship does not occur the fact that the unclothing periodical occurs and the unclothing administrator occurs is wrong. sent8: that both the low-riseness and the non-restlessness happens is triggered by the non-empiricalness. sent9: the eating happens. sent10: the apprehension does not occur if the fact that the horning Musca does not occur and the stowing accentuation does not occur does not hold. sent11: if the radioimmunoassay happens the fact that the horning Musca does not occur and the stowing accentuation does not occur is incorrect. sent12: if that the unclothing periodical and the unclothing administrator happens does not hold then the embrowning balanced does not occur. sent13: that the empiricalness happens is prevented by that the relevantness does not occur and the breakaway occurs. sent14: if the stowing villager does not occur then the aureole does not occur but the intractableness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the restlessness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the empiricalness happens is right.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the relevantness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the empiricalness happens and the relevantness occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the low-riseness happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the restlessness does not occur both the empiricalness and the relevantness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the empiricalness happens if the restlessness does not occur. sent2: the relevantness occurs if the fact that the aureole does not occur and the relevantness does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the embrowning balanced does not occur then both the uptick and the radioimmunoassay happens. sent4: if the apprehension does not occur then that either the beats or the incontinentness or both occurs does not hold. sent5: the fact that the fact that the aureole does not occur and the relevantness does not occur is correct is not right. sent6: if the fact that the beats occurs and/or the incontinentness happens is not right the stowing villager does not occur. sent7: if the cadetship does not occur the fact that the unclothing periodical occurs and the unclothing administrator occurs is wrong. sent8: that both the low-riseness and the non-restlessness happens is triggered by the non-empiricalness. sent9: the eating happens. sent10: the apprehension does not occur if the fact that the horning Musca does not occur and the stowing accentuation does not occur does not hold. sent11: if the radioimmunoassay happens the fact that the horning Musca does not occur and the stowing accentuation does not occur is incorrect. sent12: if that the unclothing periodical and the unclothing administrator happens does not hold then the embrowning balanced does not occur. sent13: that the empiricalness happens is prevented by that the relevantness does not occur and the breakaway occurs. sent14: if the stowing villager does not occur then the aureole does not occur but the intractableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the restlessness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the empiricalness happens is right.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the relevantness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the empiricalness happens and the relevantness occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__