the fact that the marking crowbait does not occur if the squat does not occur is not true.
sent1: that the intestateness occurs and the marking crowbait does not occur is caused by that the squatting does not occur. sent2: the marshaling Lennon does not occur. sent3: the squatting yields that the intestateness but not the marking crowbait happens. sent4: the subtraction does not occur. sent5: the non-apocryphalness prevents the non-bracteolateness. sent6: the intestateness occurs. sent7: if the squatting does not occur the intestateness happens. sent8: the curableness occurs but the cardiography does not occur. sent9: the accessing does not occur. sent10: the marking crowbait happens if the squat does not occur. sent11: that the lumbering does not occur causes the synergisticness. sent12: the fact that the lumbering does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: that the squatting does not occur brings about that the intestateness and the marking crowbait happens. sent14: the marking crowbait does not occur if the squat happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the squatting does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the intestateness but not the marking crowbait happens is not false.; int1 -> int2: the marking crowbait does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the marking crowbait does not occur if the squat does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the intestateness occurs and the marking crowbait does not occur is caused by that the squatting does not occur. sent2: the marshaling Lennon does not occur. sent3: the squatting yields that the intestateness but not the marking crowbait happens. sent4: the subtraction does not occur. sent5: the non-apocryphalness prevents the non-bracteolateness. sent6: the intestateness occurs. sent7: if the squatting does not occur the intestateness happens. sent8: the curableness occurs but the cardiography does not occur. sent9: the accessing does not occur. sent10: the marking crowbait happens if the squat does not occur. sent11: that the lumbering does not occur causes the synergisticness. sent12: the fact that the lumbering does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: that the squatting does not occur brings about that the intestateness and the marking crowbait happens. sent14: the marking crowbait does not occur if the squat happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the squatting does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the intestateness but not the marking crowbait happens is not false.; int1 -> int2: the marking crowbait does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__