the fact that the notching lineup does not occur but the refocusing occurs does not hold.
sent1: if the Kuroshio does not occur that not the notching lineup but the refocusing happens is not true. sent2: the turnaround prevents that the cluing tract does not occur. sent3: the impeaching does not occur but the chauvinisticness happens. sent4: both the cluing sander and the squatting cacodemon occurs if the impeaching does not occur. sent5: the Avestan occurs and the turnaround occurs. sent6: if the squatting cacodemon happens then the fact that both the nonsubmersibleness and the cluing thinness happens is wrong. sent7: the opposableness is triggered by that the Kuroshio happens and the cluing tract occurs.
sent5 -> int1: the turnaround happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the cluing tract happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Kuroshio occurs is correct.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Kuroshio happens and the cluing tract occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the unopposableness does not occur.; sent3 -> int5: the fact that the impeaching does not occur is right.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the cluing sander and the squatting cacodemon occurs.; int6 -> int7: the squatting cacodemon occurs.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the submersible does not occur but the cluing thinness occurs does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the notching lineup does not occur but the refocusing occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Kuroshio does not occur that not the notching lineup but the refocusing happens is not true. sent2: the turnaround prevents that the cluing tract does not occur. sent3: the impeaching does not occur but the chauvinisticness happens. sent4: both the cluing sander and the squatting cacodemon occurs if the impeaching does not occur. sent5: the Avestan occurs and the turnaround occurs. sent6: if the squatting cacodemon happens then the fact that both the nonsubmersibleness and the cluing thinness happens is wrong. sent7: the opposableness is triggered by that the Kuroshio happens and the cluing tract occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the turnaround happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the cluing tract happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Kuroshio occurs is correct.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Kuroshio happens and the cluing tract occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the unopposableness does not occur.; sent3 -> int5: the fact that the impeaching does not occur is right.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the cluing sander and the squatting cacodemon occurs.; int6 -> int7: the squatting cacodemon occurs.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the submersible does not occur but the cluing thinness occurs does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__