if the fact that the grinder is not a Ignatius is not wrong that the packet does not grub MIT and it is not a kind of a paramyxovirus is not true.
sent1: if the condiment is not a paramyxovirus then that that the packet does not grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus is not incorrect is not right. sent2: the fountain snarls. sent3: the grinder is not a paramyxovirus. sent4: if the grinder is a kind of a Ignatius that the packet does not grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus is wrong. sent5: that the packet grubs MIT but it is not a paramyxovirus does not hold if the condiment is not a paramyxovirus. sent6: that the packet does grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus is incorrect if the grinder is not a Ignatius. sent7: the fact that the packet does not grub MIT and is a kind of a paramyxovirus is not correct if that the grinder is not a Ignatius is true. sent8: if the packet is a Ignatius then it is a paramyxovirus. sent9: if the fountain does arch then the grinder is a Ignatius. sent10: the fact that the packet does not grub MIT and is a paramyxovirus is not right. sent11: the packet does not grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus if the condiment is not a paramyxovirus. sent12: the condiment does concur. sent13: the grinder is tractable. sent14: if the condiment is a paramyxovirus then the fountain does concur. sent15: the condiment does not grub MIT. sent16: something arches if it concurs. sent17: the meteortropism is a paramyxovirus. sent18: the fact that the packet grubs MIT but it is not a paramyxovirus is wrong. sent19: if the grinder is not a Ignatius then the packet does not grub MIT and is not a kind of a paramyxovirus. sent20: if the condiment is not a paramyxovirus then that the fact that the packet does not grub MIT but it is a paramyxovirus is wrong is right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the condiment is a paramyxovirus is not false.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the fountain concurs is not incorrect.; sent16 -> int2: if the fountain does concur that it is an arched hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fountain is a kind of an arched.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the grinder is a kind of a Ignatius.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grinder is not a Ignatius.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the condiment is not a paramyxovirus.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: that that the packet does not grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus does not hold is correct.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the grinder is not a Ignatius is not wrong that the packet does not grub MIT and it is not a kind of a paramyxovirus is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the condiment is not a paramyxovirus then that that the packet does not grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus is not incorrect is not right. sent2: the fountain snarls. sent3: the grinder is not a paramyxovirus. sent4: if the grinder is a kind of a Ignatius that the packet does not grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus is wrong. sent5: that the packet grubs MIT but it is not a paramyxovirus does not hold if the condiment is not a paramyxovirus. sent6: that the packet does grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus is incorrect if the grinder is not a Ignatius. sent7: the fact that the packet does not grub MIT and is a kind of a paramyxovirus is not correct if that the grinder is not a Ignatius is true. sent8: if the packet is a Ignatius then it is a paramyxovirus. sent9: if the fountain does arch then the grinder is a Ignatius. sent10: the fact that the packet does not grub MIT and is a paramyxovirus is not right. sent11: the packet does not grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus if the condiment is not a paramyxovirus. sent12: the condiment does concur. sent13: the grinder is tractable. sent14: if the condiment is a paramyxovirus then the fountain does concur. sent15: the condiment does not grub MIT. sent16: something arches if it concurs. sent17: the meteortropism is a paramyxovirus. sent18: the fact that the packet grubs MIT but it is not a paramyxovirus is wrong. sent19: if the grinder is not a Ignatius then the packet does not grub MIT and is not a kind of a paramyxovirus. sent20: if the condiment is not a paramyxovirus then that the fact that the packet does not grub MIT but it is a paramyxovirus is wrong is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the condiment is a paramyxovirus is not false.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the fountain concurs is not incorrect.; sent16 -> int2: if the fountain does concur that it is an arched hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fountain is a kind of an arched.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the grinder is a kind of a Ignatius.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grinder is not a Ignatius.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the condiment is not a paramyxovirus.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: that that the packet does not grub MIT and is not a paramyxovirus does not hold is correct.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__