the synovia is a Oriolidae but it is not a kind of a colostomy if it is a kind of a Anacanthini.
sent1: if the fact that the synovia solemnizes wig and is not a sugar-bush is false then the fact that it is a kind of a colostomy is not incorrect. sent2: the synovia moves. sent3: if something is not a Anacanthini and it is not archipelagic then it is not a kind of a colostomy. sent4: the piculet is not a kind of a erethism if it is a kind of a dolor and it does not solemnize eared. sent5: something does not haze atheist. sent6: the synovia is a kind of a Cephalanthera that is not anisogamic if it is a Anacanthini. sent7: the advancer teases smoked if that it is a Oriolidae and it is not a limitation does not hold. sent8: if the synovia is a Anacanthini it solemnizes Holocentridae. sent9: if the etanercept does solemnize zap it is a kind of a Anacanthini. sent10: that the conservator is a erethism and is not a kind of a Oriolidae is false. sent11: the synovia is a Anacanthini and does not haze vasotomy if it is nidicolous. sent12: if that the synovia does not solemnize Tragopogon is right then it does not tease onrush. sent13: the meter is a kind of a colostomy if the synovia is not a colostomy. sent14: if that the synovia is a Anacanthini is not wrong it is a Oriolidae. sent15: that if the fact that something does not solemnize coot and it is not a Staphylinidae is wrong it does solemnize coot is not wrong. sent16: the synovia is not a Anacanthini if it is not a Oriolidae. sent17: the synovia is a Oriolidae. sent18: if there exists something such that it does not haze atheist then the wig is a Cephalanthera. sent19: the synovia is a colostomy but it is not a Smollett if it is carinal.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the synovia is both a Oriolidae and not a colostomy does not hold.;
the meter is a colostomy.
sent3 -> int1: the synovia is not a colostomy if it is not a Anacanthini and it is not archipelagic.; sent15 -> int2: the Briton does solemnize coot if the fact that it does not solemnize coot and it is not a kind of a Staphylinidae is false.; sent5 & sent18 -> int3: the wig is a Cephalanthera.; int3 -> int4: the fact that something is a Cephalanthera is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the synovia is a Oriolidae but it is not a kind of a colostomy if it is a kind of a Anacanthini. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the synovia solemnizes wig and is not a sugar-bush is false then the fact that it is a kind of a colostomy is not incorrect. sent2: the synovia moves. sent3: if something is not a Anacanthini and it is not archipelagic then it is not a kind of a colostomy. sent4: the piculet is not a kind of a erethism if it is a kind of a dolor and it does not solemnize eared. sent5: something does not haze atheist. sent6: the synovia is a kind of a Cephalanthera that is not anisogamic if it is a Anacanthini. sent7: the advancer teases smoked if that it is a Oriolidae and it is not a limitation does not hold. sent8: if the synovia is a Anacanthini it solemnizes Holocentridae. sent9: if the etanercept does solemnize zap it is a kind of a Anacanthini. sent10: that the conservator is a erethism and is not a kind of a Oriolidae is false. sent11: the synovia is a Anacanthini and does not haze vasotomy if it is nidicolous. sent12: if that the synovia does not solemnize Tragopogon is right then it does not tease onrush. sent13: the meter is a kind of a colostomy if the synovia is not a colostomy. sent14: if that the synovia is a Anacanthini is not wrong it is a Oriolidae. sent15: that if the fact that something does not solemnize coot and it is not a Staphylinidae is wrong it does solemnize coot is not wrong. sent16: the synovia is not a Anacanthini if it is not a Oriolidae. sent17: the synovia is a Oriolidae. sent18: if there exists something such that it does not haze atheist then the wig is a Cephalanthera. sent19: the synovia is a colostomy but it is not a Smollett if it is carinal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the synovia is both a Oriolidae and not a colostomy does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__