the nit is coarse.
sent1: if the fact that that the roulette is not a axletree and does not unravel is correct does not hold then the retreat is a kind of an oration. sent2: the retreat is stimulative. sent3: the roulette is not a kind of an oration if something is not a vestment but a aphorist. sent4: if that the retreat is stimulative is not incorrect then it is not a vestment and not a aphorist. sent5: if something is not a vestment and it is not a kind of a aphorist the fact that the roulette is not an oration is true. sent6: the nit is a axletree and not coarse if the fact that the roulette is not a kind of an oration is correct.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the retreat is not a vestment and it is not a kind of a aphorist.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a vestment and is not a aphorist.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the roulette is not an oration hold.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the nit is a axletree but not coarse.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the nit is coarse.
$hypothesis$ = the nit is coarse. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that that the roulette is not a axletree and does not unravel is correct does not hold then the retreat is a kind of an oration. sent2: the retreat is stimulative. sent3: the roulette is not a kind of an oration if something is not a vestment but a aphorist. sent4: if that the retreat is stimulative is not incorrect then it is not a vestment and not a aphorist. sent5: if something is not a vestment and it is not a kind of a aphorist the fact that the roulette is not an oration is true. sent6: the nit is a axletree and not coarse if the fact that the roulette is not a kind of an oration is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the retreat is not a vestment and it is not a kind of a aphorist.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a vestment and is not a aphorist.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the roulette is not an oration hold.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the nit is a axletree but not coarse.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__