that the thrall does not regurgitate and it is not nebulous is false.
sent1: the thrall is re-entrant. sent2: the thrall is a kind of non-nebulous thing that does not rehabilitate quirk. sent3: the thrall is both not a dejection and not a cry. sent4: the thrall is unbroken and it is a buckthorn. sent5: the omelet is not a kind of a junket and it is not a ruggedness. sent6: the balm is not nephritic if it is not important and rehabilitates Excellency. sent7: the thrall is nephritic thing that is a junket. sent8: that the thrall is not epithelial but it is nebulous does not hold. sent9: the thrall is not pointless. sent10: if the cloisonne is both not noninvasive and not nephritic it is not a Exmoor. sent11: the thrall is not important. sent12: the fact that the cine-film does not rehabilitate Taoist and is not nephritic does not hold. sent13: the buteonine is not nephritic. sent14: the fact that the ephemera is non-nebulous but it is a seismologist is false. sent15: the Taoist is non-nebulous and it is not a Scout. sent16: the thrall is a kind of non-inshore thing that does not birl. sent17: the synthesist is not Lilliputian if it is not nephritic and it is a skidder. sent18: that that the idolizer is both not an affine and not social is not correct is not incorrect. sent19: the sallow is not a misconception if it is both not nebulous and arthromeric. sent20: the thrall is not a tetrafluoroethylene.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thrall does not regurgitate and it is not nebulous.; sent7 -> int1: the thrall is nephritic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the thrall does not regurgitate and it is not nebulous is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the thrall is re-entrant. sent2: the thrall is a kind of non-nebulous thing that does not rehabilitate quirk. sent3: the thrall is both not a dejection and not a cry. sent4: the thrall is unbroken and it is a buckthorn. sent5: the omelet is not a kind of a junket and it is not a ruggedness. sent6: the balm is not nephritic if it is not important and rehabilitates Excellency. sent7: the thrall is nephritic thing that is a junket. sent8: that the thrall is not epithelial but it is nebulous does not hold. sent9: the thrall is not pointless. sent10: if the cloisonne is both not noninvasive and not nephritic it is not a Exmoor. sent11: the thrall is not important. sent12: the fact that the cine-film does not rehabilitate Taoist and is not nephritic does not hold. sent13: the buteonine is not nephritic. sent14: the fact that the ephemera is non-nebulous but it is a seismologist is false. sent15: the Taoist is non-nebulous and it is not a Scout. sent16: the thrall is a kind of non-inshore thing that does not birl. sent17: the synthesist is not Lilliputian if it is not nephritic and it is a skidder. sent18: that that the idolizer is both not an affine and not social is not correct is not incorrect. sent19: the sallow is not a misconception if it is both not nebulous and arthromeric. sent20: the thrall is not a tetrafluoroethylene. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thrall does not regurgitate and it is not nebulous.; sent7 -> int1: the thrall is nephritic.; __UNKNOWN__