there is something such that if it is not a tragacanth then it is not a permissibility and is not monotypic.
sent1: if the ouster is apsidal then it is not a kind of a tragacanth. sent2: if something is not apsidal then it is not monotypic. sent3: the fact that that the flank is a Fabian hold is wrong if the fact that it is not unsociable is correct. sent4: something is not a kind of an inhalant if it is a kind of a permissibility that is profitable. sent5: the fact that the flank is not profitable hold. sent6: the flank is a tragacanth if it is a permissibility. sent7: the fact that the flank does not disentangle default is not incorrect. sent8: the flank is costal and does not consternate exhibitionist. sent9: the flank is inhalant but it is not a enkephalin if it is unprofitable. sent10: if something is an inhalant and not a enkephalin then it is not apsidal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flank is a kind of a permissibility.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the flank is a kind of a tragacanth.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the flank is not a kind of a tragacanth.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the flank is not a permissibility.; sent2 -> int4: the flank is not monotypic if it is not apsidal.; sent10 -> int5: if the flank is an inhalant that is not a enkephalin it is not apsidal.; sent9 & sent5 -> int6: the flank is a kind of an inhalant but it is not a kind of a enkephalin.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the flank is not apsidal is not wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the flank is not monotypic.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the flank is not a permissibility and it is non-monotypic.; [assump2] & int9 -> int10: the flank is not a kind of a permissibility and it is not monotypic if it is not a kind of a tragacanth.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the ouster is non-Assamese and it is not a permissibility.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a tragacanth then it is not a permissibility and is not monotypic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ouster is apsidal then it is not a kind of a tragacanth. sent2: if something is not apsidal then it is not monotypic. sent3: the fact that that the flank is a Fabian hold is wrong if the fact that it is not unsociable is correct. sent4: something is not a kind of an inhalant if it is a kind of a permissibility that is profitable. sent5: the fact that the flank is not profitable hold. sent6: the flank is a tragacanth if it is a permissibility. sent7: the fact that the flank does not disentangle default is not incorrect. sent8: the flank is costal and does not consternate exhibitionist. sent9: the flank is inhalant but it is not a enkephalin if it is unprofitable. sent10: if something is an inhalant and not a enkephalin then it is not apsidal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flank is a kind of a permissibility.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the flank is a kind of a tragacanth.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the flank is not a kind of a tragacanth.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the flank is not a permissibility.; sent2 -> int4: the flank is not monotypic if it is not apsidal.; sent10 -> int5: if the flank is an inhalant that is not a enkephalin it is not apsidal.; sent9 & sent5 -> int6: the flank is a kind of an inhalant but it is not a kind of a enkephalin.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the flank is not apsidal is not wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the flank is not monotypic.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the flank is not a permissibility and it is non-monotypic.; [assump2] & int9 -> int10: the flank is not a kind of a permissibility and it is not monotypic if it is not a kind of a tragacanth.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__