the Copt does not raft and is hymenal.
sent1: the Copt is hymenal if the fact that it is not an aluminum and does not scorch tramcar is incorrect. sent2: the Copt does not raft. sent3: if something is not a kind of an income and does squire Copt then it does wheedle. sent4: that the anthropoid does not squire Venezuelan and does not scorch tramcar does not hold. sent5: the Copt is not an income. sent6: that the Copt is not an aluminum and it does not scorch tramcar does not hold if it kennels Raffia. sent7: that the fork does squire scullery but it does not kennel Raffia does not hold. sent8: if the modem is not non-hymenal then the fact that it is not a kidney and is astrocytic is not correct. sent9: the Copt is not an income and does squire Copt. sent10: the Copt is not antiquarian. sent11: the fact that the tramcar is a handset that is not a lepidopterology is wrong. sent12: the Copt is a halon. sent13: the fact that the Copt does not profile and it does not scorch tramcar is incorrect if it is biogenic. sent14: if the Copt does squire Venezuelan it wheedles. sent15: if the whey is greenhouse the fact that it occupies and it is not an income is incorrect.
sent3 -> int1: if the Copt is not an income but it does squire Copt that it does wheedle is not wrong.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Copt wheedles.;
$hypothesis$ = the Copt does not raft and is hymenal. ; $context$ = sent1: the Copt is hymenal if the fact that it is not an aluminum and does not scorch tramcar is incorrect. sent2: the Copt does not raft. sent3: if something is not a kind of an income and does squire Copt then it does wheedle. sent4: that the anthropoid does not squire Venezuelan and does not scorch tramcar does not hold. sent5: the Copt is not an income. sent6: that the Copt is not an aluminum and it does not scorch tramcar does not hold if it kennels Raffia. sent7: that the fork does squire scullery but it does not kennel Raffia does not hold. sent8: if the modem is not non-hymenal then the fact that it is not a kidney and is astrocytic is not correct. sent9: the Copt is not an income and does squire Copt. sent10: the Copt is not antiquarian. sent11: the fact that the tramcar is a handset that is not a lepidopterology is wrong. sent12: the Copt is a halon. sent13: the fact that the Copt does not profile and it does not scorch tramcar is incorrect if it is biogenic. sent14: if the Copt does squire Venezuelan it wheedles. sent15: if the whey is greenhouse the fact that it occupies and it is not an income is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the Copt is not an income but it does squire Copt that it does wheedle is not wrong.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Copt wheedles.; __UNKNOWN__