that that the oxyhemoglobin is not non-subordinating and it does rank is not false is not correct.
sent1: if that the oxyhemoglobin is not a Clinopodium is not incorrect it is not a kind of a ceilidh. sent2: the fact that the oxyhemoglobin is a ceilidh is not true if that the nalorphine does not uplift clubroom and is a nalorphine does not hold. sent3: the fact that the clubroom does not retract is not wrong. sent4: if the oxyhemoglobin is a kind of a nalorphine then the nalorphine does not subordinate. sent5: that the nalorphine is not subordinating but it is a ceilidh is not right if there is something such that it is a nalorphine. sent6: the nalorphine is a kind of a nalorphine and ranks. sent7: if the fact that the oxyhemoglobin is not a nalorphine but a rank is false the nalorphine does not uplift Rajidae. sent8: the oxyhemoglobin does rank. sent9: if something that does not rank uplifts clubroom then it retracts. sent10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a promising. sent11: if the oxyhemoglobin is not a ceilidh it does not retract and it does not uplift Rajidae. sent12: something does not promise if it uplifts clubroom. sent13: if something is a promising the fact that the nalorphine does not uplift clubroom but it is a kind of a nalorphine is wrong. sent14: something is a subordinating if it does not retract and does not uplift Rajidae.
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: that the nalorphine does not uplift clubroom and is a nalorphine is incorrect.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the oxyhemoglobin is not a ceilidh.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the oxyhemoglobin does not retract and it does not uplift Rajidae.; sent14 -> int4: the oxyhemoglobin is a kind of a subordinating if it does not retract and it does not uplift Rajidae.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the oxyhemoglobin does subordinate.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the oxyhemoglobin is both subordinating and a rank is not right.
sent12 -> int6: if the nalorphine does uplift clubroom then the fact that it is not a promising is true.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the oxyhemoglobin is not non-subordinating and it does rank is not false is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the oxyhemoglobin is not a Clinopodium is not incorrect it is not a kind of a ceilidh. sent2: the fact that the oxyhemoglobin is a ceilidh is not true if that the nalorphine does not uplift clubroom and is a nalorphine does not hold. sent3: the fact that the clubroom does not retract is not wrong. sent4: if the oxyhemoglobin is a kind of a nalorphine then the nalorphine does not subordinate. sent5: that the nalorphine is not subordinating but it is a ceilidh is not right if there is something such that it is a nalorphine. sent6: the nalorphine is a kind of a nalorphine and ranks. sent7: if the fact that the oxyhemoglobin is not a nalorphine but a rank is false the nalorphine does not uplift Rajidae. sent8: the oxyhemoglobin does rank. sent9: if something that does not rank uplifts clubroom then it retracts. sent10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a promising. sent11: if the oxyhemoglobin is not a ceilidh it does not retract and it does not uplift Rajidae. sent12: something does not promise if it uplifts clubroom. sent13: if something is a promising the fact that the nalorphine does not uplift clubroom but it is a kind of a nalorphine is wrong. sent14: something is a subordinating if it does not retract and does not uplift Rajidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: that the nalorphine does not uplift clubroom and is a nalorphine is incorrect.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the oxyhemoglobin is not a ceilidh.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the oxyhemoglobin does not retract and it does not uplift Rajidae.; sent14 -> int4: the oxyhemoglobin is a kind of a subordinating if it does not retract and it does not uplift Rajidae.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the oxyhemoglobin does subordinate.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__