the prostitute does act Tamale.
sent1: if the silicide is not indigestible then that it is a dossal and it does not bend pulverization is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the Malecite condoles bendability but it is not a kind of a prize does not hold that it does condoles bendability is not right. sent3: something is not nonspherical and not illative if it does condole bendability. sent4: the Malecite is not a prize. sent5: something does not condole Montagu or it is stomatous or both if it is a bulrush. sent6: the fact that the fact that either something is a kind of a Hahn or it acts Tamale or both is not correct if it is not a ZIP is correct. sent7: the perijove is not a prize and/or is a kind of a pension if the shrimp is not illative. sent8: if there exists something such that it is spherical and it is not illative then that the isotherm does not condole sonant is true. sent9: the shrimp is not a ZIP if the fact that the perijove is a ZIP that does not bend viola does not hold. sent10: there is something such that it does bend cart. sent11: if the fact that the shunter is spherical thing that does not condole bendability does not hold then the shrimp is not illative. sent12: the harvest is a kind of a bulrush if there exists something such that the fact that it either is a antiphonary or does not act foster-father or both is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the prostitute does act Tamale if the perijove does not prize or it does pension or both is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the Malecite does condole sonant but it does not bend snowfield is false. sent15: that that the silicide does not bend cart and is indigestible is not wrong does not hold if there exists something such that it bend cart. sent16: the fact that the shunter is both a prize and a pension is not correct if that it does not act Tamale hold. sent17: the fact that something is exportable is correct if the fact that it is a dossal and does not bend pulverization is not true. sent18: if the silicide is exportable that either the mooring is antiphonary or it does not act foster-father or both is wrong. sent19: the shunter does not act Tamale if that the shrimp is a Hahn and/or it does act Tamale is not correct. sent20: the fact that the perijove is a ZIP but it does not bend viola is not right if there exists something such that it is stomatous. sent21: if the Malecite is not nonspherical then that the shunter is a kind of nonspherical thing that does not condole bendability is not true. sent22: if the Malecite is nonspherical then it does condole sonant and does not bend snowfield. sent23: the fact that the prostitute is stomatous is right if either the harvest does not condole Montagu or it is stomatous or both. sent24: the silicide is not indigestible if the fact that it does not bend cart and it is indigestible is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Malecite is nonspherical.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the Malecite condoles sonant but it does not bend snowfield.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Malecite is not nonspherical.;
the isotherm does not condole sonant.
sent3 -> int4: the Malecite is not nonspherical and it is not illative if it does condole bendability.; sent6 -> int5: that the shrimp is a Hahn and/or acts Tamale is false if it is not a ZIP.; sent5 -> int6: the harvest does not condole Montagu and/or it is stomatous if it is a kind of a bulrush.; sent17 -> int7: if the fact that the silicide is a dossal and does not bend pulverization is not true then it is exportable.; sent10 & sent15 -> int8: the fact that the silicide does not bend cart but it is indigestible does not hold.; sent24 & int8 -> int9: the silicide is not indigestible.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the silicide is a dossal and does not bend pulverization is wrong.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the silicide is exportable.; sent18 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the mooring is antiphonary and/or it does not act foster-father does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is antiphonary or does not act foster-father or both does not hold.; int13 & sent12 -> int14: the harvest is a kind of a bulrush.; int6 & int14 -> int15: that the harvest does not condole Montagu and/or is stomatous is right.; sent23 & int15 -> int16: the prostitute is stomatous.; int16 -> int17: there are stomatous things.; int17 & sent20 -> int18: the fact that the perijove is a ZIP but it does not bend viola is not true.; sent9 & int18 -> int19: the shrimp is not a ZIP.; int5 & int19 -> int20: that the shrimp is a kind of a Hahn and/or it does act Tamale is false.; sent19 & int20 -> int21: that the shunter does not act Tamale is not wrong.; sent16 & int21 -> int22: that the shunter is a prize and is a pension is not true.; int22 -> int23: there is something such that the fact that it does prize and pensions does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the prostitute does act Tamale. ; $context$ = sent1: if the silicide is not indigestible then that it is a dossal and it does not bend pulverization is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the Malecite condoles bendability but it is not a kind of a prize does not hold that it does condoles bendability is not right. sent3: something is not nonspherical and not illative if it does condole bendability. sent4: the Malecite is not a prize. sent5: something does not condole Montagu or it is stomatous or both if it is a bulrush. sent6: the fact that the fact that either something is a kind of a Hahn or it acts Tamale or both is not correct if it is not a ZIP is correct. sent7: the perijove is not a prize and/or is a kind of a pension if the shrimp is not illative. sent8: if there exists something such that it is spherical and it is not illative then that the isotherm does not condole sonant is true. sent9: the shrimp is not a ZIP if the fact that the perijove is a ZIP that does not bend viola does not hold. sent10: there is something such that it does bend cart. sent11: if the fact that the shunter is spherical thing that does not condole bendability does not hold then the shrimp is not illative. sent12: the harvest is a kind of a bulrush if there exists something such that the fact that it either is a antiphonary or does not act foster-father or both is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the prostitute does act Tamale if the perijove does not prize or it does pension or both is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the Malecite does condole sonant but it does not bend snowfield is false. sent15: that that the silicide does not bend cart and is indigestible is not wrong does not hold if there exists something such that it bend cart. sent16: the fact that the shunter is both a prize and a pension is not correct if that it does not act Tamale hold. sent17: the fact that something is exportable is correct if the fact that it is a dossal and does not bend pulverization is not true. sent18: if the silicide is exportable that either the mooring is antiphonary or it does not act foster-father or both is wrong. sent19: the shunter does not act Tamale if that the shrimp is a Hahn and/or it does act Tamale is not correct. sent20: the fact that the perijove is a ZIP but it does not bend viola is not right if there exists something such that it is stomatous. sent21: if the Malecite is not nonspherical then that the shunter is a kind of nonspherical thing that does not condole bendability is not true. sent22: if the Malecite is nonspherical then it does condole sonant and does not bend snowfield. sent23: the fact that the prostitute is stomatous is right if either the harvest does not condole Montagu or it is stomatous or both. sent24: the silicide is not indigestible if the fact that it does not bend cart and it is indigestible is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Malecite is nonspherical.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the Malecite condoles sonant but it does not bend snowfield.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Malecite is not nonspherical.; __UNKNOWN__