the miss is a kind of a practice.
sent1: the fact that something is a lackey and it does practice does not hold if it is not a neuroscience. sent2: the fact that the miss does decide and clenches is false if the fact that it is not a kind of a lackey is not wrong. sent3: the miss studs stomach. sent4: the borax does not prophesy. sent5: the fact that the miss does not stud orderliness does not hold. sent6: the rattle does not prophesy. sent7: if that the puttyroot is both not antipollution and not a lackey is not true then the miss is antipollution. sent8: The stomach studs miss. sent9: the scratcher is rotational if the puttyroot is a neuroscience. sent10: the puttyroot does not stud stomach if either it does cause brood or it prophesies or both. sent11: something is not a kind of a neuroscience if it is not a kind of a neuroscience or does not cause brood or both. sent12: the miss is not rotational. sent13: the Tarheel does not stud stomach if there exists something such that it does not prophesy. sent14: the fact that the miss does decide and clenches is not true. sent15: if that the Tarheel does not stud stomach is not false then the scratcher is not a neuroscience and/or it does not cause brood. sent16: the Tarheel does not cause brood if it is a Ibadan. sent17: if the fact that the miss does stud stomach and is a lackey is not wrong the fact that it does not prophesy hold. sent18: if the miss is not a lackey then that it does not decide and does clench is not right. sent19: if the scratcher is rotational then the fact that the Tarheel is rotational and does not cause brood is not right. sent20: the puttyroot is a neuroscience if the miss does decide. sent21: the Tarheel is rotational but it does not cause brood if it is a Ibadan. sent22: if the fact that the miss does not prophesy is not false then it is a practice. sent23: the puttyroot causes brood and/or it does prophesy. sent24: the stomach is a kind of a herd and it does stud stomach. sent25: the Tarheel is a Ibadan. sent26: the fact that the Tarheel is rotational and it does cause brood does not hold. sent27: that if the scratcher is rotational then that the Tarheel is rotational and does cause brood is wrong is true. sent28: the Tarheel does not cause brood.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the miss is not a lackey.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the miss does not decide but it clenches does not hold.; sent21 & sent25 -> int2: the Tarheel is a kind of rotational thing that does not cause brood.;
the fact that the miss is not a kind of a practice is correct.
sent1 -> int3: that the puttyroot is both a lackey and a practice does not hold if it is not a neuroscience.; sent10 & sent23 -> int4: that the puttyroot does not stud stomach is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the miss is a kind of a practice. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a lackey and it does practice does not hold if it is not a neuroscience. sent2: the fact that the miss does decide and clenches is false if the fact that it is not a kind of a lackey is not wrong. sent3: the miss studs stomach. sent4: the borax does not prophesy. sent5: the fact that the miss does not stud orderliness does not hold. sent6: the rattle does not prophesy. sent7: if that the puttyroot is both not antipollution and not a lackey is not true then the miss is antipollution. sent8: The stomach studs miss. sent9: the scratcher is rotational if the puttyroot is a neuroscience. sent10: the puttyroot does not stud stomach if either it does cause brood or it prophesies or both. sent11: something is not a kind of a neuroscience if it is not a kind of a neuroscience or does not cause brood or both. sent12: the miss is not rotational. sent13: the Tarheel does not stud stomach if there exists something such that it does not prophesy. sent14: the fact that the miss does decide and clenches is not true. sent15: if that the Tarheel does not stud stomach is not false then the scratcher is not a neuroscience and/or it does not cause brood. sent16: the Tarheel does not cause brood if it is a Ibadan. sent17: if the fact that the miss does stud stomach and is a lackey is not wrong the fact that it does not prophesy hold. sent18: if the miss is not a lackey then that it does not decide and does clench is not right. sent19: if the scratcher is rotational then the fact that the Tarheel is rotational and does not cause brood is not right. sent20: the puttyroot is a neuroscience if the miss does decide. sent21: the Tarheel is rotational but it does not cause brood if it is a Ibadan. sent22: if the fact that the miss does not prophesy is not false then it is a practice. sent23: the puttyroot causes brood and/or it does prophesy. sent24: the stomach is a kind of a herd and it does stud stomach. sent25: the Tarheel is a Ibadan. sent26: the fact that the Tarheel is rotational and it does cause brood does not hold. sent27: that if the scratcher is rotational then that the Tarheel is rotational and does cause brood is wrong is true. sent28: the Tarheel does not cause brood. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the miss is not a lackey.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the miss does not decide but it clenches does not hold.; sent21 & sent25 -> int2: the Tarheel is a kind of rotational thing that does not cause brood.; __UNKNOWN__