the footstool is not a Latino.
sent1: the lactogen is not inaccurate. sent2: the dicot laces and it eliminates. sent3: the dicot is pleural if it is analogous. sent4: the fact that something is shrinkable and eliminates is not correct if it is not unrhetorical. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is shrinkable and it does eliminate is wrong then the shittah is not shrinkable. sent6: the ancients is pleural. sent7: the fact that something is not unrhetorical is not incorrect if either it is not profaned or it is not unrhetorical or both. sent8: something that is accurate does not miscarry car and is a kind of a diabetic. sent9: if the lactogen does not miscarry car and is a diabetic it is not profaned. sent10: the dicot is a Latino. sent11: if the chrysoprase laces the fact that it is bismuthal is not false. sent12: the chrysoprase is not bismuthal if the dicot is pleural and it laces. sent13: the dicot is a kind of a trussed. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not bismuthal the fact that the footstool is not unrhetorical and is shrinkable does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the footstool laces is not wrong then it is a kind of a Lamarckism. sent16: the Pekinese trusses. sent17: the footstool does reign Pekinese. sent18: that the footstool is bismuthal and it does reign etamine is wrong. sent19: if the fact that the footstool is not pleural but it is bismuthal is incorrect it is not a kind of a Latino. sent20: something that trusses is a Latino. sent21: the fact that the footstool is unrhetorical and it is a laced is not correct if there is something such that that it does not eliminate hold. sent22: the footstool is not a Latino if that it is not unrhetorical and it is shrinkable does not hold. sent23: if the chrysoprase is a kind of a laced that is a trussed the dicot is not bismuthal. sent24: the dicot eliminates.
sent2 -> int1: that the dicot is a laced is true.;
the footstool is a Latino.
sent20 -> int2: if the footstool is a trussed then it is a Latino.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the lactogen is a kind of shrinkable thing that does eliminate is not right if it is rhetorical.; sent7 -> int4: the lactogen is not unrhetorical if it is not profaned and/or it is not unrhetorical.; sent8 -> int5: if the fact that the lactogen is not inaccurate is not incorrect it does not miscarry car and it is a kind of a diabetic.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the lactogen does not miscarry car and is a kind of a diabetic.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the lactogen is not profaned.; int7 -> int8: the lactogen is non-profaned and/or is not unrhetorical.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the lactogen is not unrhetorical.; int3 & int9 -> int10: that the lactogen is shrinkable and does eliminate does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is shrinkable and eliminates does not hold.; int11 & sent5 -> int12: the shittah is not shrinkable.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is not shrinkable is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the footstool is not a Latino. ; $context$ = sent1: the lactogen is not inaccurate. sent2: the dicot laces and it eliminates. sent3: the dicot is pleural if it is analogous. sent4: the fact that something is shrinkable and eliminates is not correct if it is not unrhetorical. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is shrinkable and it does eliminate is wrong then the shittah is not shrinkable. sent6: the ancients is pleural. sent7: the fact that something is not unrhetorical is not incorrect if either it is not profaned or it is not unrhetorical or both. sent8: something that is accurate does not miscarry car and is a kind of a diabetic. sent9: if the lactogen does not miscarry car and is a diabetic it is not profaned. sent10: the dicot is a Latino. sent11: if the chrysoprase laces the fact that it is bismuthal is not false. sent12: the chrysoprase is not bismuthal if the dicot is pleural and it laces. sent13: the dicot is a kind of a trussed. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not bismuthal the fact that the footstool is not unrhetorical and is shrinkable does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the footstool laces is not wrong then it is a kind of a Lamarckism. sent16: the Pekinese trusses. sent17: the footstool does reign Pekinese. sent18: that the footstool is bismuthal and it does reign etamine is wrong. sent19: if the fact that the footstool is not pleural but it is bismuthal is incorrect it is not a kind of a Latino. sent20: something that trusses is a Latino. sent21: the fact that the footstool is unrhetorical and it is a laced is not correct if there is something such that that it does not eliminate hold. sent22: the footstool is not a Latino if that it is not unrhetorical and it is shrinkable does not hold. sent23: if the chrysoprase is a kind of a laced that is a trussed the dicot is not bismuthal. sent24: the dicot eliminates. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: that the dicot is a laced is true.; __UNKNOWN__