the suppressor is not a kind of a inconvertibility and does contribute transpose.
sent1: the fact that the hamlet does not extinguish Arauca and it is not shrinkable is wrong. sent2: the hamlet is not costive. sent3: the sunrise does extinguish gouache and is not a kind of a opsonin if the hamlet is not a opsonin. sent4: the turbulence does not contribute transpose if the sunrise does extinguish gouache and is not a opsonin. sent5: the hamlet does not extinguish Arauca and it is not shrinkable if it is not a ABB. sent6: if the hamlet is non-costive then that it does rack and/or does extinguish Mysore does not hold. sent7: if the turbulence does not contribute transpose then that the suppressor is not a inconvertibility and does contribute transpose is incorrect. sent8: the hamlet is not a kind of a opsonin if it is a kind of a ABB and it does not extinguish suppressor. sent9: if that the hamlet is a kind of a rack and/or it extinguishes Mysore does not hold it does not extinguish suppressor.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hamlet is not a kind of a ABB.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the hamlet does not extinguish Arauca and is not shrinkable.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the hamlet is a kind of a ABB.; sent6 & sent2 -> int4: that the hamlet is a kind of a rack or extinguishes Mysore or both does not hold.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the hamlet does not extinguish suppressor.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the hamlet is a kind of a ABB that does not extinguish suppressor.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the hamlet is not a opsonin.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the sunrise does extinguish gouache but it is not a opsonin.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the turbulence does not contribute transpose.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the suppressor is not a kind of a inconvertibility and does contribute transpose. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hamlet does not extinguish Arauca and it is not shrinkable is wrong. sent2: the hamlet is not costive. sent3: the sunrise does extinguish gouache and is not a kind of a opsonin if the hamlet is not a opsonin. sent4: the turbulence does not contribute transpose if the sunrise does extinguish gouache and is not a opsonin. sent5: the hamlet does not extinguish Arauca and it is not shrinkable if it is not a ABB. sent6: if the hamlet is non-costive then that it does rack and/or does extinguish Mysore does not hold. sent7: if the turbulence does not contribute transpose then that the suppressor is not a inconvertibility and does contribute transpose is incorrect. sent8: the hamlet is not a kind of a opsonin if it is a kind of a ABB and it does not extinguish suppressor. sent9: if that the hamlet is a kind of a rack and/or it extinguishes Mysore does not hold it does not extinguish suppressor. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hamlet is not a kind of a ABB.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the hamlet does not extinguish Arauca and is not shrinkable.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the hamlet is a kind of a ABB.; sent6 & sent2 -> int4: that the hamlet is a kind of a rack or extinguishes Mysore or both does not hold.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the hamlet does not extinguish suppressor.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the hamlet is a kind of a ABB that does not extinguish suppressor.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the hamlet is not a opsonin.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the sunrise does extinguish gouache but it is not a opsonin.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the turbulence does not contribute transpose.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__