the Passer is not a pentecostalism.
sent1: the yucca does not lamb megahertz but it does lamb antihistamine. sent2: if the fact that the yucca turns Muscovite and it is platonic does not hold it does not turns Muscovite. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it does turn Muscovite and is platonic is wrong. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does not adduct Flaubert and is not non-platonic does not hold the yucca is Arawakan. sent5: if the fact that the snowcap is not a myrrh and/or it is neuralgic does not hold the mixed-blood is a Alexander. sent6: the mixed-blood is a kind of a Alexander. sent7: that the mixed-blood does not adduct Flaubert and is platonic does not hold. sent8: the mixed-blood is neuralgic. sent9: the backpack does not turn Muscovite. sent10: the fact that the widower adducts Flaubert is correct if that the backpack is neuralgic is true. sent11: the mixed-blood is a Alexander if the fact that the widower adducts Flaubert is right. sent12: if that the mixed-blood is not a kind of a Alexander and/or does adduct Flaubert is incorrect then the yucca does turn Muscovite. sent13: something that does not turn Muscovite does not adduct Flaubert. sent14: the snowcap is both not a Alexander and Arawakan. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it does turn Muscovite and is not non-neuralgic is wrong. sent16: if something that is not a myrrh is not non-Arawakan then the Passer is a pentecostalism. sent17: if the widower does adduct Flaubert then that the mixed-blood is not a Alexander or it adduct Flaubert or both is false. sent18: there is something such that that it is a kind of a myrrh and it is Arawakan is false. sent19: if that either the Passer is not a kind of a pentecostalism or it adducts Flaubert or both does not hold then the mixed-blood is platonic. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Alexander that does turn Muscovite does not hold. sent21: if the fact that the mixed-blood either is a Alexander or does adduct Flaubert or both does not hold then the yucca does turn Muscovite. sent22: the fact that the yucca does turn Muscovite and it is platonic does not hold. sent23: the snowcap is a millivolt. sent24: the backpack is neuralgic if there is something such that the fact that it is not a myrrh and it is Arawakan does not hold. sent25: if the fact that the snowcap is not neuralgic and/or it is a myrrh is wrong the yucca is not non-platonic. sent26: that the snowcap does not adduct Flaubert and is Arawakan does not hold. sent27: the mixed-blood is non-planetary.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the snowcap is not a myrrh but Arawakan is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a myrrh and is Arawakan does not hold.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the backpack is neuralgic.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the widower does adduct Flaubert.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the mixed-blood is not a Alexander and/or adducts Flaubert is not true.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the yucca does turn Muscovite.; sent2 & sent22 -> int6: the yucca does not turn Muscovite.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the snowcap is not a kind of a myrrh but it is Arawakan.; int8 -> int9: something is not a myrrh and is Arawakan.; int9 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the Passer is not a kind of a pentecostalism.
sent13 -> int10: the Passer does not adduct Flaubert if the fact that it does not turn Muscovite is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the Passer is not a pentecostalism. ; $context$ = sent1: the yucca does not lamb megahertz but it does lamb antihistamine. sent2: if the fact that the yucca turns Muscovite and it is platonic does not hold it does not turns Muscovite. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it does turn Muscovite and is platonic is wrong. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does not adduct Flaubert and is not non-platonic does not hold the yucca is Arawakan. sent5: if the fact that the snowcap is not a myrrh and/or it is neuralgic does not hold the mixed-blood is a Alexander. sent6: the mixed-blood is a kind of a Alexander. sent7: that the mixed-blood does not adduct Flaubert and is platonic does not hold. sent8: the mixed-blood is neuralgic. sent9: the backpack does not turn Muscovite. sent10: the fact that the widower adducts Flaubert is correct if that the backpack is neuralgic is true. sent11: the mixed-blood is a Alexander if the fact that the widower adducts Flaubert is right. sent12: if that the mixed-blood is not a kind of a Alexander and/or does adduct Flaubert is incorrect then the yucca does turn Muscovite. sent13: something that does not turn Muscovite does not adduct Flaubert. sent14: the snowcap is both not a Alexander and Arawakan. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it does turn Muscovite and is not non-neuralgic is wrong. sent16: if something that is not a myrrh is not non-Arawakan then the Passer is a pentecostalism. sent17: if the widower does adduct Flaubert then that the mixed-blood is not a Alexander or it adduct Flaubert or both is false. sent18: there is something such that that it is a kind of a myrrh and it is Arawakan is false. sent19: if that either the Passer is not a kind of a pentecostalism or it adducts Flaubert or both does not hold then the mixed-blood is platonic. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Alexander that does turn Muscovite does not hold. sent21: if the fact that the mixed-blood either is a Alexander or does adduct Flaubert or both does not hold then the yucca does turn Muscovite. sent22: the fact that the yucca does turn Muscovite and it is platonic does not hold. sent23: the snowcap is a millivolt. sent24: the backpack is neuralgic if there is something such that the fact that it is not a myrrh and it is Arawakan does not hold. sent25: if the fact that the snowcap is not neuralgic and/or it is a myrrh is wrong the yucca is not non-platonic. sent26: that the snowcap does not adduct Flaubert and is Arawakan does not hold. sent27: the mixed-blood is non-planetary. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the snowcap is not a myrrh but Arawakan is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a myrrh and is Arawakan does not hold.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the backpack is neuralgic.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the widower does adduct Flaubert.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the mixed-blood is not a Alexander and/or adducts Flaubert is not true.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the yucca does turn Muscovite.; sent2 & sent22 -> int6: the yucca does not turn Muscovite.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the snowcap is not a kind of a myrrh but it is Arawakan.; int8 -> int9: something is not a myrrh and is Arawakan.; int9 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__