if the student is not a burden then the fact that the locksmith is not litigious is correct.
sent1: something is a kind of a burden if that it does not excrete carouse and/or does repress soma is false. sent2: if the fact that the student excretes carouse and/or does not repress soma is incorrect then it does burden. sent3: that the console does not tick libertine and/or does not burden is not true. sent4: if the student does not excrete carouse and/or does not repress soma the locksmith is litigious. sent5: the locksmith is not litigious if the student does not excrete carouse and/or does not repress soma. sent6: if the fact that the student does not excrete carouse or it represses soma or both is wrong the fact that it does burden is true. sent7: the locksmith is litigious if the fact that the student does not burden is correct. sent8: the locksmith is litigious. sent9: the locksmith is litigious and it burdens if the Miro is not epithelial. sent10: if the fact that the student does not repress soma and/or it is a ginkgo is false the fact that it does not sample whiffletree is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the student does not excrete carouse or it does not repress soma or both does not hold.;
the bergamot does not repress soma.
$hypothesis$ = if the student is not a burden then the fact that the locksmith is not litigious is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a burden if that it does not excrete carouse and/or does repress soma is false. sent2: if the fact that the student excretes carouse and/or does not repress soma is incorrect then it does burden. sent3: that the console does not tick libertine and/or does not burden is not true. sent4: if the student does not excrete carouse and/or does not repress soma the locksmith is litigious. sent5: the locksmith is not litigious if the student does not excrete carouse and/or does not repress soma. sent6: if the fact that the student does not excrete carouse or it represses soma or both is wrong the fact that it does burden is true. sent7: the locksmith is litigious if the fact that the student does not burden is correct. sent8: the locksmith is litigious. sent9: the locksmith is litigious and it burdens if the Miro is not epithelial. sent10: if the fact that the student does not repress soma and/or it is a ginkgo is false the fact that it does not sample whiffletree is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the student does not excrete carouse or it does not repress soma or both does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__