the fact that the allergen clanks wax-chandler and it crooks drapery is false.
sent1: if the ruby is not afebrile then it ammoniates ayapana and is a thundering. sent2: the allergen does crook panfish. sent3: the ruby is not afebrile. sent4: the fact that the ruby is either a thundering or afebrile or both is incorrect if the pleurodont does not ammoniate ayapana. sent5: if the stapler does not clank Medellin then the allergen does not clank stapler. sent6: the allergen is not afebrile but it does crook panfish. sent7: if the allergen does not crook drapery then it does crook panfish. sent8: if the fact that the ruby does not clank Medellin is false that the stapler does clank stapler is true. sent9: the fact that the ruby crooks drapery hold. sent10: that something clanks wax-chandler and it does crook drapery is incorrect if it does not clank stapler. sent11: the allergen is not a marri. sent12: the ruby is inaudible. sent13: The ayapana ammoniates allergen. sent14: if something ammoniates ayapana it does clank wax-chandler. sent15: something does not ammoniate ayapana if that it is not a kind of an undercarriage and does ammoniate ayapana is not right. sent16: if the allergen is not inaudible then the stapler does not clank stapler. sent17: the allergen is audible thing that crooks panfish if it does not crook drapery. sent18: if the ruby is not afebrile then it clanks Medellin and it thunders. sent19: the ruby ammoniates ayapana if it is a kind of a thundering. sent20: the allergen ammoniates ayapana. sent21: the stapler does not crook drapery.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allergen does not crook drapery.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the allergen is not inaudible and does crook panfish.; int1 -> int2: the allergen is not inaudible.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the stapler does not clank stapler.; sent18 & sent3 -> int4: the ruby does clank Medellin and is a thundering.; int4 -> int5: the ruby does clank Medellin.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the stapler does clank stapler.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the allergen does crook drapery is not false.; sent14 -> int9: if the allergen does ammoniate ayapana it does clank wax-chandler.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the allergen does clank wax-chandler.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the allergen does clank wax-chandler and it crooks drapery is not right.
sent10 -> int11: that the allergen does clank wax-chandler and it crooks drapery is false if it does not clank stapler.; sent15 -> int12: if that the pleurodont is not a kind of an undercarriage but it does ammoniate ayapana is not correct then it does not ammoniate ayapana.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the allergen clanks wax-chandler and it crooks drapery is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ruby is not afebrile then it ammoniates ayapana and is a thundering. sent2: the allergen does crook panfish. sent3: the ruby is not afebrile. sent4: the fact that the ruby is either a thundering or afebrile or both is incorrect if the pleurodont does not ammoniate ayapana. sent5: if the stapler does not clank Medellin then the allergen does not clank stapler. sent6: the allergen is not afebrile but it does crook panfish. sent7: if the allergen does not crook drapery then it does crook panfish. sent8: if the fact that the ruby does not clank Medellin is false that the stapler does clank stapler is true. sent9: the fact that the ruby crooks drapery hold. sent10: that something clanks wax-chandler and it does crook drapery is incorrect if it does not clank stapler. sent11: the allergen is not a marri. sent12: the ruby is inaudible. sent13: The ayapana ammoniates allergen. sent14: if something ammoniates ayapana it does clank wax-chandler. sent15: something does not ammoniate ayapana if that it is not a kind of an undercarriage and does ammoniate ayapana is not right. sent16: if the allergen is not inaudible then the stapler does not clank stapler. sent17: the allergen is audible thing that crooks panfish if it does not crook drapery. sent18: if the ruby is not afebrile then it clanks Medellin and it thunders. sent19: the ruby ammoniates ayapana if it is a kind of a thundering. sent20: the allergen ammoniates ayapana. sent21: the stapler does not crook drapery. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allergen does not crook drapery.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the allergen is not inaudible and does crook panfish.; int1 -> int2: the allergen is not inaudible.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the stapler does not clank stapler.; sent18 & sent3 -> int4: the ruby does clank Medellin and is a thundering.; int4 -> int5: the ruby does clank Medellin.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the stapler does clank stapler.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the allergen does crook drapery is not false.; sent14 -> int9: if the allergen does ammoniate ayapana it does clank wax-chandler.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the allergen does clank wax-chandler.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__