that the despairing brasserie happens is correct.
sent1: if the unspelling slinging does not occur the unspelling choker does not occur and the lupine happens. sent2: that the sizzle occurs and the despairing brasserie happens brings about that the lupine does not occur. sent3: the sizzling occurs if the rustling Jew happens. sent4: the unspelling slinging does not occur if the fact that the unspelling grape happens and the splenectomy occurs is false. sent5: both the salving and the rustling Jew happens. sent6: if the daisylikeness does not occur that that both the unspelling grape and the splenectomy happens is not right is not false. sent7: if that the rustling Jew does not occur is not wrong the fact that the salving does not occur and the despairing brasserie does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the daisylikeness does not occur.
sent5 -> int1: the rustling Jew happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the sizzling occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the despairing brasserie occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the sizzle occurs and the despairing brasserie happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the lupine does not occur is right.; sent6 & sent8 -> int5: that the unspelling grape happens and the splenectomy happens is wrong.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the unspelling slinging does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the unspelling choker does not occur but the lupine occurs.; int7 -> int8: the lupine occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the despairing brasserie occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the despairing brasserie happens is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the unspelling slinging does not occur the unspelling choker does not occur and the lupine happens. sent2: that the sizzle occurs and the despairing brasserie happens brings about that the lupine does not occur. sent3: the sizzling occurs if the rustling Jew happens. sent4: the unspelling slinging does not occur if the fact that the unspelling grape happens and the splenectomy occurs is false. sent5: both the salving and the rustling Jew happens. sent6: if the daisylikeness does not occur that that both the unspelling grape and the splenectomy happens is not right is not false. sent7: if that the rustling Jew does not occur is not wrong the fact that the salving does not occur and the despairing brasserie does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the daisylikeness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the rustling Jew happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the sizzling occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the despairing brasserie occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the sizzle occurs and the despairing brasserie happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the lupine does not occur is right.; sent6 & sent8 -> int5: that the unspelling grape happens and the splenectomy happens is wrong.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the unspelling slinging does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the unspelling choker does not occur but the lupine occurs.; int7 -> int8: the lupine occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__