the foundry is not juicy.
sent1: the Milanese is juicy. sent2: if something is not a kind of a checkers but it is an incident it is not juicy. sent3: the rose does not grumble rapid but it eyewitnesses. sent4: if the fact that the microfilm is a kind of an incident is right the foundry is juicy. sent5: if the microfilm is juicy then the foundry is a kind of an incident. sent6: the microfilm is not calyceal. sent7: the microfilm is both not calyceal and not non-incident. sent8: the foundry is not juicy if the microfilm is calyceal but it is not juicy. sent9: if the fact that the lamb's-quarter is a kind of curable thing that is calyceal is wrong then the microfilm is calyceal. sent10: the fact that the lamb's-quarter is not incurable but it is calyceal is false if the rangefinder is gonadotropic.
sent7 -> int1: the microfilm is incident.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the foundry is not juicy.
sent2 -> int2: if the microfilm does not checker and is incident then it is not juicy.;
$hypothesis$ = the foundry is not juicy. ; $context$ = sent1: the Milanese is juicy. sent2: if something is not a kind of a checkers but it is an incident it is not juicy. sent3: the rose does not grumble rapid but it eyewitnesses. sent4: if the fact that the microfilm is a kind of an incident is right the foundry is juicy. sent5: if the microfilm is juicy then the foundry is a kind of an incident. sent6: the microfilm is not calyceal. sent7: the microfilm is both not calyceal and not non-incident. sent8: the foundry is not juicy if the microfilm is calyceal but it is not juicy. sent9: if the fact that the lamb's-quarter is a kind of curable thing that is calyceal is wrong then the microfilm is calyceal. sent10: the fact that the lamb's-quarter is not incurable but it is calyceal is false if the rangefinder is gonadotropic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the microfilm is incident.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__