the fact that the tenoroon either is not unintrusive or is not a trackball or both is not true.
sent1: something is not conspicuous if the fact that it is not a Hogmanay and is a kind of an uptake is not right. sent2: the pyrometer is unreal if it is not a trackball and it is conspicuous. sent3: something is not a kind of a clutter if that it is both a clutter and conspicuous is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a clutter and/or it does not gather thecodont then the tenoroon is not conspicuous. sent5: the chicle is a trackball. sent6: the pyrometer does gather bouffe. sent7: the Mama is not a trackball. sent8: the fact that the tenoroon does clutter and it is conspicuous is not correct if something is not conspicuous. sent9: if the pyrometer does not gather thecodont then the tenoroon is intrusive or it is not a kind of a trackball or both. sent10: the pyrometer does gather hobbyist. sent11: the fact that the outfield socializes pyrometer and/or is not centralist does not hold if it is not nonaddictive. sent12: either the pyrometer is a kind of a clutter or it does gather thecodont or both. sent13: the fact that the Mama is conspicuous and is intrusive is not true if it is not a trackball. sent14: something gathers thecodont and it gathers hobbyist if it is not a clutter. sent15: the tenoroon is a kind of a trackball. sent16: the pyrometer is a clutter if it is substantial and does gather hobbyist. sent17: if something is not conspicuous then that it is intrusive and/or it is not a kind of a trackball is not right.
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the tenoroon is not conspicuous is not incorrect then that it is intrusive or it is not a kind of a trackball or both does not hold.;
the tenoroon gathers hobbyist.
sent14 -> int2: the tenoroon does gather thecodont and it does gather hobbyist if it is not a kind of a clutter.; sent3 -> int3: the fact that if that the tenoroon is the clutter and it is conspicuous is incorrect the tenoroon does not clutter is correct.; sent13 & sent7 -> int4: that the Mama is conspicuous and it is intrusive is false.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is both not inconspicuous and not unintrusive is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tenoroon either is not unintrusive or is not a trackball or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not conspicuous if the fact that it is not a Hogmanay and is a kind of an uptake is not right. sent2: the pyrometer is unreal if it is not a trackball and it is conspicuous. sent3: something is not a kind of a clutter if that it is both a clutter and conspicuous is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a clutter and/or it does not gather thecodont then the tenoroon is not conspicuous. sent5: the chicle is a trackball. sent6: the pyrometer does gather bouffe. sent7: the Mama is not a trackball. sent8: the fact that the tenoroon does clutter and it is conspicuous is not correct if something is not conspicuous. sent9: if the pyrometer does not gather thecodont then the tenoroon is intrusive or it is not a kind of a trackball or both. sent10: the pyrometer does gather hobbyist. sent11: the fact that the outfield socializes pyrometer and/or is not centralist does not hold if it is not nonaddictive. sent12: either the pyrometer is a kind of a clutter or it does gather thecodont or both. sent13: the fact that the Mama is conspicuous and is intrusive is not true if it is not a trackball. sent14: something gathers thecodont and it gathers hobbyist if it is not a clutter. sent15: the tenoroon is a kind of a trackball. sent16: the pyrometer is a clutter if it is substantial and does gather hobbyist. sent17: if something is not conspicuous then that it is intrusive and/or it is not a kind of a trackball is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the tenoroon is not conspicuous is not incorrect then that it is intrusive or it is not a kind of a trackball or both does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__