the fact that if the recidivism happens the introversiveness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the introversiveness occurs if that the weaning happens and the recidivism occurs is not right. sent2: that the rendering clubfooted occurs and the inopportuneness occurs prevents that the swag happens. sent3: that the weaning does not occur results in that the stapedectomy happens but the glint does not occur. sent4: the weaning happens. sent5: the satisfaction does not occur if the fact that not the clutching but the eulogizing fertility happens is false. sent6: if that the weaning happens and the recidivism does not occur is not right the introversiveness occurs. sent7: if the salvage occurs either the introversiveness occurs or the recidivism does not occur or both. sent8: that the K.E. does not occur prevents that the mediateness happens. sent9: the K.E. does not occur but the offense occurs if the swag does not occur. sent10: the fact that that not the clutching but the eulogizing fertility happens is incorrect is true if the mediateness does not occur. sent11: that the satisfaction does not occur causes that the snooker and the salvaging happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the weaning but not the recidivism occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the recidivism does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recidivism happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the weaning but not the recidivism happens does not hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the introversiveness occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the stapedectomy but not the glint happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the recidivism happens the introversiveness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the introversiveness occurs if that the weaning happens and the recidivism occurs is not right. sent2: that the rendering clubfooted occurs and the inopportuneness occurs prevents that the swag happens. sent3: that the weaning does not occur results in that the stapedectomy happens but the glint does not occur. sent4: the weaning happens. sent5: the satisfaction does not occur if the fact that not the clutching but the eulogizing fertility happens is false. sent6: if that the weaning happens and the recidivism does not occur is not right the introversiveness occurs. sent7: if the salvage occurs either the introversiveness occurs or the recidivism does not occur or both. sent8: that the K.E. does not occur prevents that the mediateness happens. sent9: the K.E. does not occur but the offense occurs if the swag does not occur. sent10: the fact that that not the clutching but the eulogizing fertility happens is incorrect is true if the mediateness does not occur. sent11: that the satisfaction does not occur causes that the snooker and the salvaging happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the weaning but not the recidivism occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the recidivism does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recidivism happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the weaning but not the recidivism happens does not hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the introversiveness occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__