the auteur is a prechlorination.
sent1: the fact that the auteur is the prechlorination if the fact that the auteur is a kind of a Faraday hold is right. sent2: the fact that the guitarist laces guitarist and does glance does not hold if there exists something such that it is a NRA. sent3: the auteur does not lace guitarist and it is not a NRA if there are nonpartisan things. sent4: if the auteur is not a kind of a glance the ketch is a kind of a prechlorination and is a Faraday. sent5: there is nothing such that it is imperfect and it does not lace cuttlefish. sent6: the guitarist is a kind of a nonpartisan if there is something such that it concretizes allice. sent7: the seine is a NRA and it is a nonpartisan. sent8: if something does not lace guitarist and it is not a NRA then it does not glance. sent9: the seine is a kind of a Norvasc that concretizes allice if the poppet is not testimonial. sent10: the auteur is a Faraday. sent11: if that the guitarist laces guitarist and is a kind of a glance does not hold it is not a kind of a glance. sent12: if that something is imperfect thing that does not lace cuttlefish is false it is not testimonial.
sent1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the ketch is not a kind of a prechlorination is false.
sent12 -> int1: the Dominion is not testimonial if that it is imperfect thing that does not lace cuttlefish is not correct.; sent5 -> int2: that the Dominion is imperfect but it does not lace cuttlefish is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Dominion is not testimonial is not false.; int3 -> int4: everything is not testimonial.; int4 -> int5: the poppet is not testimonial.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the seine is a kind of a Norvasc and concretizes allice.; int6 -> int7: the seine concretizes allice.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it concretizes allice.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the guitarist is nonpartisan.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a nonpartisan.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the auteur does not lace guitarist and is not a NRA.; sent8 -> int12: the auteur is not a glance if it does not lace guitarist and is not a kind of a NRA.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the auteur is not a kind of a glance.; sent4 & int13 -> int14: the ketch is a prechlorination and it is a Faraday.; int14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the auteur is a prechlorination. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the auteur is the prechlorination if the fact that the auteur is a kind of a Faraday hold is right. sent2: the fact that the guitarist laces guitarist and does glance does not hold if there exists something such that it is a NRA. sent3: the auteur does not lace guitarist and it is not a NRA if there are nonpartisan things. sent4: if the auteur is not a kind of a glance the ketch is a kind of a prechlorination and is a Faraday. sent5: there is nothing such that it is imperfect and it does not lace cuttlefish. sent6: the guitarist is a kind of a nonpartisan if there is something such that it concretizes allice. sent7: the seine is a NRA and it is a nonpartisan. sent8: if something does not lace guitarist and it is not a NRA then it does not glance. sent9: the seine is a kind of a Norvasc that concretizes allice if the poppet is not testimonial. sent10: the auteur is a Faraday. sent11: if that the guitarist laces guitarist and is a kind of a glance does not hold it is not a kind of a glance. sent12: if that something is imperfect thing that does not lace cuttlefish is false it is not testimonial. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__