the sanctum is not a longness.
sent1: if the dial traces palate then it is a kind of a apoenzyme. sent2: the mucor is not a apoenzyme and/or it does not penetrate if the dial is a apoenzyme. sent3: if the palate is a playpen that the fig is not a kind of a pseudophloem and does penetrate is incorrect. sent4: that the dial is a plant is correct if it is not a conspirator and it is not a kind of a fatigue. sent5: if the fig is not a playpen then the sanctum is a longness but it does not trace palate. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not trace palate then the mucor penetrates and/or it plants. sent7: something is not an alienation but it is a pseudophloem. sent8: if that something is not a pseudophloem and does penetrate is wrong then it does not penetrate. sent9: that the celery is not an alienation and guarantees pasha does not hold if it is a kind of a home. sent10: if the fig traces palate then the mucor does not traces palate. sent11: something does trace palate and it is a apoenzyme if it does not penetrate. sent12: if the mucor is not a apoenzyme or it does not penetrate or both then the sanctum is not a kind of a longness. sent13: the palate is a kind of a playpen if the Mesa is an alienation. sent14: everything is not a kind of a conspirator and it is not a fatigue. sent15: if the dial is a plant then it does trace palate. sent16: if the mucor does not trace palate then the sanctum is a longness and it is a plant. sent17: the Mesa is an alienation if that the celery is not an alienation but it guarantees pasha is not right.
sent14 -> int1: the dial is not a conspirator and it is not a fatigue.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the dial does plant.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the dial traces palate.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the dial is a apoenzyme.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the mucor is not a apoenzyme and/or does not penetrate.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the sanctum is a kind of a longness.
sent11 -> int6: if the fig does not penetrate it traces palate and is a apoenzyme.; sent8 -> int7: the fig does not penetrate if the fact that it is not a kind of a pseudophloem and penetrate is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the sanctum is not a longness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dial traces palate then it is a kind of a apoenzyme. sent2: the mucor is not a apoenzyme and/or it does not penetrate if the dial is a apoenzyme. sent3: if the palate is a playpen that the fig is not a kind of a pseudophloem and does penetrate is incorrect. sent4: that the dial is a plant is correct if it is not a conspirator and it is not a kind of a fatigue. sent5: if the fig is not a playpen then the sanctum is a longness but it does not trace palate. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not trace palate then the mucor penetrates and/or it plants. sent7: something is not an alienation but it is a pseudophloem. sent8: if that something is not a pseudophloem and does penetrate is wrong then it does not penetrate. sent9: that the celery is not an alienation and guarantees pasha does not hold if it is a kind of a home. sent10: if the fig traces palate then the mucor does not traces palate. sent11: something does trace palate and it is a apoenzyme if it does not penetrate. sent12: if the mucor is not a apoenzyme or it does not penetrate or both then the sanctum is not a kind of a longness. sent13: the palate is a kind of a playpen if the Mesa is an alienation. sent14: everything is not a kind of a conspirator and it is not a fatigue. sent15: if the dial is a plant then it does trace palate. sent16: if the mucor does not trace palate then the sanctum is a longness and it is a plant. sent17: the Mesa is an alienation if that the celery is not an alienation but it guarantees pasha is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the dial is not a conspirator and it is not a fatigue.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the dial does plant.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the dial traces palate.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the dial is a apoenzyme.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the mucor is not a apoenzyme and/or does not penetrate.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__