the fact that there exists something such that if it is an aesthetics and does not disorder then it does not crowd is right.
sent1: the hare is noticeable if that it is a emendation and it is not an undress is right. sent2: the farmhand does not crowd if it is a kind of aesthetics thing that is not a disordered. sent3: if the farmhand is a kind of aesthetics thing that is not a kind of a disordered then it is a crowd. sent4: if something that is a crag is not an aesthetics it is not lobate. sent5: if the cubist is a disordered that is not a kind of a Menuhin it is not a Angelus. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a heterosexual and it is not a kind of a rebutter then it is glad. sent7: there is something such that if it is both a oviduct and not a snowdrift then it is not a supplejack.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the tuberosity is both a crag and not aesthetics that it is lobate is false.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is an aesthetics and does not disorder then it does not crowd is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the hare is noticeable if that it is a emendation and it is not an undress is right. sent2: the farmhand does not crowd if it is a kind of aesthetics thing that is not a disordered. sent3: if the farmhand is a kind of aesthetics thing that is not a kind of a disordered then it is a crowd. sent4: if something that is a crag is not an aesthetics it is not lobate. sent5: if the cubist is a disordered that is not a kind of a Menuhin it is not a Angelus. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a heterosexual and it is not a kind of a rebutter then it is glad. sent7: there is something such that if it is both a oviduct and not a snowdrift then it is not a supplejack. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__