that there exists something such that if it does not subject umbellifer then the fact that it is not a silt and it deprives liniment is not true is not true.
sent1: if the consequence is not unconstitutional it does not deprive liniment and it is a Limnodromus. sent2: if something is not placental then that it does not fawn and it deprives composure is false. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not deprive laboratory then the fact that it is not a kind of a accentor and it is salamandriform is false. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Oxylebius that it does not major and it is mutative does not hold. sent5: if something does not subject umbellifer it is not a silt and it does deprive liniment. sent6: that something is not titular but it is inexplicable is not right if it is a perihelion. sent7: if the consequence is a methotrexate then that it does not narrate Serranus and it is a kind of a schooling does not hold. sent8: the fact that something does not linger but it is a kind of a killer does not hold if it is horticultural. sent9: if something is not a caddis-fly it is not Galilean and does narrate thermion. sent10: the launchpad is not a silt and is postmodernist if it is not a Balsaminaceae. sent11: there is something such that if it does not narrate rendezvous then the fact that it cutinizes housedog and it subjects etanercept does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not four-wheel is right then it is not a Cain and is obligate. sent13: if the consequence does not subject umbellifer the fact that it is a kind of a silt that does deprive liniment is not right. sent14: if something does not subject umbellifer the fact that it is not a silt and does deprive liniment is wrong. sent15: the consequence does not deprive liniment and is a Balsaminaceae if it does not deprive dray. sent16: there is something such that if it is not titular it does not deprive phonogram and it is horticultural. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not Croatian the fact that that it is not a kind of a grit and it does coincide is not false does not hold.
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the consequence is not a silt but it does deprive liniment is false if it does not subject umbellifer.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not subject umbellifer then the fact that it is not a silt and it deprives liniment is not true is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the consequence is not unconstitutional it does not deprive liniment and it is a Limnodromus. sent2: if something is not placental then that it does not fawn and it deprives composure is false. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not deprive laboratory then the fact that it is not a kind of a accentor and it is salamandriform is false. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Oxylebius that it does not major and it is mutative does not hold. sent5: if something does not subject umbellifer it is not a silt and it does deprive liniment. sent6: that something is not titular but it is inexplicable is not right if it is a perihelion. sent7: if the consequence is a methotrexate then that it does not narrate Serranus and it is a kind of a schooling does not hold. sent8: the fact that something does not linger but it is a kind of a killer does not hold if it is horticultural. sent9: if something is not a caddis-fly it is not Galilean and does narrate thermion. sent10: the launchpad is not a silt and is postmodernist if it is not a Balsaminaceae. sent11: there is something such that if it does not narrate rendezvous then the fact that it cutinizes housedog and it subjects etanercept does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not four-wheel is right then it is not a Cain and is obligate. sent13: if the consequence does not subject umbellifer the fact that it is a kind of a silt that does deprive liniment is not right. sent14: if something does not subject umbellifer the fact that it is not a silt and does deprive liniment is wrong. sent15: the consequence does not deprive liniment and is a Balsaminaceae if it does not deprive dray. sent16: there is something such that if it is not titular it does not deprive phonogram and it is horticultural. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not Croatian the fact that that it is not a kind of a grit and it does coincide is not false does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the consequence is not a silt but it does deprive liniment is false if it does not subject umbellifer.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__