something does not uplift Apus and/or is not a sub-assembly.
sent1: if that the skydiver is not unthinkable hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a poplar and uplifts approach is not right. sent2: the skydiver does not uplift Apus if the fact that the tom-tom does uplift Apus and is a maypole does not hold. sent3: if something does not interfere skinny-dipper then the tom-tom does not uplift Apus and/or it is a sub-assembly. sent4: the corncrib is not a poplar if there exists something such that the fact that it is full and it is not unthinkable is wrong. sent5: if the corncrib does full the skydiver is unthinkable. sent6: either the tom-tom does uplift Apus or it is not a sub-assembly or both. sent7: the fact that the tom-tom fulls and/or it is not a kind of a sub-assembly is not wrong if there is something such that it does not interfere skinny-dipper. sent8: the fact that something does uplift Apus and is a kind of a maypole is not right if it is not a photogravure. sent9: the tom-tom does not uplift Apus and/or is not a kind of a sub-assembly if something does not interfere skinny-dipper. sent10: that something is a poplar and does uplift approach is not right if it does not full. sent11: if the corncrib is not full the fact that it is a kind of a poplar and it does uplift approach does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that it does not uplift Apus and/or it is a sub-assembly. sent13: if the fact that the corncrib is not a poplar but it uplifts approach is false then it does not interfere skinny-dipper. sent14: the approach either does not interfere jaconet or is not a poplar or both if there exists something such that it is not a poplar. sent15: something uplifts approach and it does interfere skinny-dipper if it is not a kind of a sub-assembly. sent16: the skydiver uplifts approach. sent17: the tom-tom does not uplift Apus or is a sub-assembly or both. sent18: there is something such that it uplifts Apus and/or is not a kind of a sub-assembly. sent19: the fact that the corncrib is a poplar and it uplifts approach does not hold. sent20: either the tom-tom does full or it does not uplift Apus or both. sent21: the corncrib does not interfere skinny-dipper if it is a poplar. sent22: something is not a sub-assembly if that it uplifts Apus is incorrect. sent23: everything is not unthinkable. sent24: the fact that something does not interfere Geochelone and does greet is false if it is not a imidazole.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corncrib fulls.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the skydiver is unthinkable.; sent23 -> int2: the skydiver is not unthinkable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the corncrib is not full.;
the approach does not interfere jaconet and/or is not a kind of a poplar.
sent15 -> int5: if the skydiver is not a sub-assembly it does uplift approach and does interfere skinny-dipper.; sent22 -> int6: if the skydiver does not uplift Apus then that it is not a sub-assembly is true.; sent8 -> int7: if the tom-tom is not a photogravure then the fact that it uplifts Apus and is a maypole does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = something does not uplift Apus and/or is not a sub-assembly. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the skydiver is not unthinkable hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a poplar and uplifts approach is not right. sent2: the skydiver does not uplift Apus if the fact that the tom-tom does uplift Apus and is a maypole does not hold. sent3: if something does not interfere skinny-dipper then the tom-tom does not uplift Apus and/or it is a sub-assembly. sent4: the corncrib is not a poplar if there exists something such that the fact that it is full and it is not unthinkable is wrong. sent5: if the corncrib does full the skydiver is unthinkable. sent6: either the tom-tom does uplift Apus or it is not a sub-assembly or both. sent7: the fact that the tom-tom fulls and/or it is not a kind of a sub-assembly is not wrong if there is something such that it does not interfere skinny-dipper. sent8: the fact that something does uplift Apus and is a kind of a maypole is not right if it is not a photogravure. sent9: the tom-tom does not uplift Apus and/or is not a kind of a sub-assembly if something does not interfere skinny-dipper. sent10: that something is a poplar and does uplift approach is not right if it does not full. sent11: if the corncrib is not full the fact that it is a kind of a poplar and it does uplift approach does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that it does not uplift Apus and/or it is a sub-assembly. sent13: if the fact that the corncrib is not a poplar but it uplifts approach is false then it does not interfere skinny-dipper. sent14: the approach either does not interfere jaconet or is not a poplar or both if there exists something such that it is not a poplar. sent15: something uplifts approach and it does interfere skinny-dipper if it is not a kind of a sub-assembly. sent16: the skydiver uplifts approach. sent17: the tom-tom does not uplift Apus or is a sub-assembly or both. sent18: there is something such that it uplifts Apus and/or is not a kind of a sub-assembly. sent19: the fact that the corncrib is a poplar and it uplifts approach does not hold. sent20: either the tom-tom does full or it does not uplift Apus or both. sent21: the corncrib does not interfere skinny-dipper if it is a poplar. sent22: something is not a sub-assembly if that it uplifts Apus is incorrect. sent23: everything is not unthinkable. sent24: the fact that something does not interfere Geochelone and does greet is false if it is not a imidazole. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corncrib fulls.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the skydiver is unthinkable.; sent23 -> int2: the skydiver is not unthinkable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the corncrib is not full.; __UNKNOWN__