the salvinorin does not churn and does not refuse if the kitty is not a kind of an idol.
sent1: the salvinorin does not churn and does not refuse if the kitty is an idol. sent2: if something does evolve the fact that it is a Caporetto and it is a hold is false. sent3: the salvinorin evolves if it bethinks infancy. sent4: if something is not a desert the salvinorin is not a churn. sent5: the salvinorin is not a reference. sent6: if the kitty does not bethink infancy then the fact that the salvinorin is a churn and is a kind of an idol does not hold. sent7: that the pyrogen is not a Babesiidae but a desert is not correct if the kitty is not an idol. sent8: something is not a kind of a Vespertilio if it is not a distaff. sent9: if that something is not a Caporetto but it is a hold does not hold it does not refuse. sent10: the salvinorin does bethink infancy. sent11: that something is not a Caporetto but a hold is not true if it does evolve. sent12: if the kitty is an idol then the fact that the pyrogen is not a kind of a Babesiidae but it does desert is wrong. sent13: that the kitty refuses if the kitty is a kind of an idol is not incorrect. sent14: that something is not a churn but a desert is not right if it is a Caporetto. sent15: the fact that the pyrogen is sociobiologic and it is an idol does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a Babesiidae and does desert is incorrect. sent17: The infancy does bethink salvinorin. sent18: that the salvinorin is a Caporetto and a hold does not hold. sent19: the fact that something is not a Caporetto but it does bethink infancy is incorrect if it is a Babesiidae. sent20: something is not a afropavo if the fact that it is a kind of made thing that does overrun amity is not true. sent21: the kitty refuses. sent22: that the prednisolone is non-connate thing that does bethink infancy is not true. sent23: the salvinorin is not legless. sent24: the salvinorin is not a kind of a churn if there is something such that that it is both not a Babesiidae and a desert is false. sent25: the kitty does not bethink infancy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kitty is not an idol.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pyrogen is not a Babesiidae and deserts is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Babesiidae and it does desert is incorrect.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the salvinorin does not churn.; sent9 -> int4: if that the salvinorin is not a kind of a Caporetto but it does hold is false it does not refuse.; sent11 -> int5: that the salvinorin is not a Caporetto but it holds is false if the fact that it evolves is not incorrect.; sent3 & sent10 -> int6: the salvinorin evolves.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the salvinorin is not a Caporetto but a hold is false.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the salvinorin does not refuse.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the salvinorin is not a churn and it does not refuse.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
if that the margate is not unmade and does overrun amity is not right that it is not a afropavo hold.
sent20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the salvinorin does not churn and does not refuse if the kitty is not a kind of an idol. ; $context$ = sent1: the salvinorin does not churn and does not refuse if the kitty is an idol. sent2: if something does evolve the fact that it is a Caporetto and it is a hold is false. sent3: the salvinorin evolves if it bethinks infancy. sent4: if something is not a desert the salvinorin is not a churn. sent5: the salvinorin is not a reference. sent6: if the kitty does not bethink infancy then the fact that the salvinorin is a churn and is a kind of an idol does not hold. sent7: that the pyrogen is not a Babesiidae but a desert is not correct if the kitty is not an idol. sent8: something is not a kind of a Vespertilio if it is not a distaff. sent9: if that something is not a Caporetto but it is a hold does not hold it does not refuse. sent10: the salvinorin does bethink infancy. sent11: that something is not a Caporetto but a hold is not true if it does evolve. sent12: if the kitty is an idol then the fact that the pyrogen is not a kind of a Babesiidae but it does desert is wrong. sent13: that the kitty refuses if the kitty is a kind of an idol is not incorrect. sent14: that something is not a churn but a desert is not right if it is a Caporetto. sent15: the fact that the pyrogen is sociobiologic and it is an idol does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a Babesiidae and does desert is incorrect. sent17: The infancy does bethink salvinorin. sent18: that the salvinorin is a Caporetto and a hold does not hold. sent19: the fact that something is not a Caporetto but it does bethink infancy is incorrect if it is a Babesiidae. sent20: something is not a afropavo if the fact that it is a kind of made thing that does overrun amity is not true. sent21: the kitty refuses. sent22: that the prednisolone is non-connate thing that does bethink infancy is not true. sent23: the salvinorin is not legless. sent24: the salvinorin is not a kind of a churn if there is something such that that it is both not a Babesiidae and a desert is false. sent25: the kitty does not bethink infancy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kitty is not an idol.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pyrogen is not a Babesiidae and deserts is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Babesiidae and it does desert is incorrect.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the salvinorin does not churn.; sent9 -> int4: if that the salvinorin is not a kind of a Caporetto but it does hold is false it does not refuse.; sent11 -> int5: that the salvinorin is not a Caporetto but it holds is false if the fact that it evolves is not incorrect.; sent3 & sent10 -> int6: the salvinorin evolves.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the salvinorin is not a Caporetto but a hold is false.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the salvinorin does not refuse.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the salvinorin is not a churn and it does not refuse.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__