that the fact that the pistil camouflages prurigo and it is an ancestry does not hold is true.
sent1: that the pistil is not Arminian is not false. sent2: that the pistil is a kind of a broth that retrogrades is not correct. sent3: if something is not a gratification that it is a kind of diatonic thing that is thermodynamics is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the totem is a kind of ornithological thing that is integumentary does not hold if it is not a Arminian. sent5: the fact that something camouflages prurigo and is a kind of an ancestry is incorrect if it is not a Arminian. sent6: the fact that something is genuine and it is corporeal is not true if it is not a lexicographer. sent7: that the pistil is a kind of a stockyard that is a kind of a Arminian is false if it is not a kind of a annualry. sent8: that something is arsenious and it is a kind of a rendezvous is false if it does not camouflage Tammuz. sent9: the fact that the pistil is a kind of a ichthyology and maintains eyelessness is wrong. sent10: the fact that something is a fit and it is Aeschylean is not true if it is not a groenendael.
sent5 -> int1: if the pistil is not a Arminian the fact that it camouflages prurigo and it is a kind of an ancestry is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the pistil camouflages prurigo and it is an ancestry does not hold is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pistil is not Arminian is not false. sent2: that the pistil is a kind of a broth that retrogrades is not correct. sent3: if something is not a gratification that it is a kind of diatonic thing that is thermodynamics is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the totem is a kind of ornithological thing that is integumentary does not hold if it is not a Arminian. sent5: the fact that something camouflages prurigo and is a kind of an ancestry is incorrect if it is not a Arminian. sent6: the fact that something is genuine and it is corporeal is not true if it is not a lexicographer. sent7: that the pistil is a kind of a stockyard that is a kind of a Arminian is false if it is not a kind of a annualry. sent8: that something is arsenious and it is a kind of a rendezvous is false if it does not camouflage Tammuz. sent9: the fact that the pistil is a kind of a ichthyology and maintains eyelessness is wrong. sent10: the fact that something is a fit and it is Aeschylean is not true if it is not a groenendael. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the pistil is not a Arminian the fact that it camouflages prurigo and it is a kind of an ancestry is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__