the caddie is not a kind of a heliogram.
sent1: the muton is not a chrysotherapy. sent2: if the egocentric is not a kind of a Tussaud then that the muton is croupy and it does film is incorrect. sent3: the muton is croupy. sent4: if something does not film then that it is croupy and it is not palatable is not right. sent5: if the fact that the homopteran is not aboral hold that the incubus is not a kind of a cormorant but it is a sigmoidoscope is not right. sent6: if the flight is not aboral and is not a psalmist then the homopteran is not aboral. sent7: that the egocentric is a heliogram is not wrong. sent8: something is a kind of a filming. sent9: the muton is not a heliogram. sent10: the caddie is not palatable if that the muton is both croupy and palatable is incorrect. sent11: that if there exists something such that it does not film the egocentric is not croupy is correct. sent12: the crocolite is not a Tussaud and does redirect sorted if the incubus is not a execration. sent13: if the muton is croupy the egocentric is not a filming. sent14: the egocentric is not a Tussaud if the crocolite is not a kind of a Tussaud and does redirect sorted. sent15: something is not a execration if that it is not a cormorant and is a sigmoidoscope is wrong. sent16: that the caddie is a kind of a heliogram is false if something does not film. sent17: if something does redirect sorted then it is not a Tussaud and/or it is a heliogram.
sent13 & sent3 -> int1: the egocentric is not a kind of a filming.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not film.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the caddie is not palatable.
sent4 -> int3: if the muton is not a filming then that the fact that it is croupy and it is not palatable is not wrong does not hold.; sent17 -> int4: the fact that the egocentric is either not a Tussaud or the heliogram or both if the egocentric does redirect sorted hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the caddie is not a kind of a heliogram. ; $context$ = sent1: the muton is not a chrysotherapy. sent2: if the egocentric is not a kind of a Tussaud then that the muton is croupy and it does film is incorrect. sent3: the muton is croupy. sent4: if something does not film then that it is croupy and it is not palatable is not right. sent5: if the fact that the homopteran is not aboral hold that the incubus is not a kind of a cormorant but it is a sigmoidoscope is not right. sent6: if the flight is not aboral and is not a psalmist then the homopteran is not aboral. sent7: that the egocentric is a heliogram is not wrong. sent8: something is a kind of a filming. sent9: the muton is not a heliogram. sent10: the caddie is not palatable if that the muton is both croupy and palatable is incorrect. sent11: that if there exists something such that it does not film the egocentric is not croupy is correct. sent12: the crocolite is not a Tussaud and does redirect sorted if the incubus is not a execration. sent13: if the muton is croupy the egocentric is not a filming. sent14: the egocentric is not a Tussaud if the crocolite is not a kind of a Tussaud and does redirect sorted. sent15: something is not a execration if that it is not a cormorant and is a sigmoidoscope is wrong. sent16: that the caddie is a kind of a heliogram is false if something does not film. sent17: if something does redirect sorted then it is not a Tussaud and/or it is a heliogram. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent3 -> int1: the egocentric is not a kind of a filming.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not film.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__