the sericulture does snag angioscope.
sent1: if there is something such that that it is a kind of factory-made thing that is ideographic is incorrect the sericulture does rice care. sent2: the diatomite is not ideographic if that the blennioid is not a kind of a gent but it does rice care is wrong. sent3: that something is factory-made and is ideographic is not correct if that it is not a gent is not incorrect. sent4: that the sericulture does not snag angioscope is not incorrect if the fact that the blennioid is both not a gent and factory-made is wrong. sent5: that everything is not a kind of a gent is not wrong. sent6: if that the diatomite either does rice care or is not ideographic or both is not correct the LEM is not factory-made. sent7: the fact that that the fact that the diatomite does rice care or it is not ideographic or both is true does not hold if there exists something such that it does not judge LEM hold. sent8: that if the LEM is not factory-made that the blennioid is not a gent but it is factory-made is incorrect is right. sent9: there is something such that it does not judge LEM.
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the diatomite rices care or is not ideographic or both is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the LEM is not factory-made.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the blennioid is not a gent and is factory-made is wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the sericulture snags angioscope.
sent3 -> int4: if the LEM is not a kind of a gent the fact that it is factory-made and it is ideographic is not true.; sent5 -> int5: the LEM is not a gent.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the LEM is factory-made and is ideographic does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is nothing such that it is both factory-made and ideographic.; int7 -> int8: that the diatomite is factory-made and ideographic is not true.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is factory-made and is ideographic does not hold.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the sericulture does rice care.;
$hypothesis$ = the sericulture does snag angioscope. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is a kind of factory-made thing that is ideographic is incorrect the sericulture does rice care. sent2: the diatomite is not ideographic if that the blennioid is not a kind of a gent but it does rice care is wrong. sent3: that something is factory-made and is ideographic is not correct if that it is not a gent is not incorrect. sent4: that the sericulture does not snag angioscope is not incorrect if the fact that the blennioid is both not a gent and factory-made is wrong. sent5: that everything is not a kind of a gent is not wrong. sent6: if that the diatomite either does rice care or is not ideographic or both is not correct the LEM is not factory-made. sent7: the fact that that the fact that the diatomite does rice care or it is not ideographic or both is true does not hold if there exists something such that it does not judge LEM hold. sent8: that if the LEM is not factory-made that the blennioid is not a gent but it is factory-made is incorrect is right. sent9: there is something such that it does not judge LEM. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the diatomite rices care or is not ideographic or both is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the LEM is not factory-made.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the blennioid is not a gent and is factory-made is wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__