the hatch is a kind of a Cambodian that is not hydrometric.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it does not crumble Sauterne and forecasts is not right the mannequin does crumble Sauterne. sent2: if the fact that something is grateful but it does not tweeze Presbyterianism does not hold then it does not crumble Sauterne. sent3: the reversible is not a transfer. sent4: the reversible is holophytic if the fact that the hatch is a Cambodian but it is not hydrometric does not hold. sent5: the fact that the reversible crumbles Sauterne but it is not holophytic does not hold. sent6: if the reversible is conspiratorial then that the mannequin is grateful but it does not tweeze Presbyterianism is false. sent7: if something is holophytic it is conspiratorial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hatch is a Cambodian that is not hydrometric does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the reversible is holophytic is right.; sent7 -> int2: if the reversible is holophytic it is conspiratorial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reversible is conspiratorial.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the mannequin is grateful and does not tweeze Presbyterianism does not hold.; sent2 -> int5: if that the mannequin is grateful and does not tweeze Presbyterianism is not correct it does not crumble Sauterne.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the mannequin does not crumble Sauterne.;
$hypothesis$ = the hatch is a kind of a Cambodian that is not hydrometric. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it does not crumble Sauterne and forecasts is not right the mannequin does crumble Sauterne. sent2: if the fact that something is grateful but it does not tweeze Presbyterianism does not hold then it does not crumble Sauterne. sent3: the reversible is not a transfer. sent4: the reversible is holophytic if the fact that the hatch is a Cambodian but it is not hydrometric does not hold. sent5: the fact that the reversible crumbles Sauterne but it is not holophytic does not hold. sent6: if the reversible is conspiratorial then that the mannequin is grateful but it does not tweeze Presbyterianism is false. sent7: if something is holophytic it is conspiratorial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hatch is a Cambodian that is not hydrometric does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the reversible is holophytic is right.; sent7 -> int2: if the reversible is holophytic it is conspiratorial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reversible is conspiratorial.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the mannequin is grateful and does not tweeze Presbyterianism does not hold.; sent2 -> int5: if that the mannequin is grateful and does not tweeze Presbyterianism is not correct it does not crumble Sauterne.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the mannequin does not crumble Sauterne.; __UNKNOWN__