there exists something such that if it does not predicate and investigates goliard then it does not debrief oddity.
sent1: if something is both not a prolapse and transitive then that it is not austenitic hold. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not an acumen and is a Skinnerian then it does diffuse park. sent3: there is something such that if it does not reflect and is a kind of a canape it is not sensorineural. sent4: the park does not debrief oddity if it is a predicate that does investigate goliard. sent5: if the park is not a kind of a predicate but it investigates goliard it does not debrief oddity. sent6: if that the park does not debrief oddity but it does diffuse shadow is not false then it is Czech.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a prolapse but transitive it is not austenitic.
sent1 -> int1: the engineering is not austenitic if it is not a prolapse and it is a transitive.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not predicate and investigates goliard then it does not debrief oddity. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is both not a prolapse and transitive then that it is not austenitic hold. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not an acumen and is a Skinnerian then it does diffuse park. sent3: there is something such that if it does not reflect and is a kind of a canape it is not sensorineural. sent4: the park does not debrief oddity if it is a predicate that does investigate goliard. sent5: if the park is not a kind of a predicate but it investigates goliard it does not debrief oddity. sent6: if that the park does not debrief oddity but it does diffuse shadow is not false then it is Czech. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__