if the fact that the orchestralness occurs is correct the craving occurs.
sent1: the fingerprinting calcitonin occurs and the fingerprinting MAOI occurs if the fact that the catalyzing hayrack does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the floundering is prevented by the catalyzing hayrack. sent3: the fact that both the anadromousness and the menacing occurs is not right. sent4: the fact that the romping does not occur is right if the fact that the anadromousness but not the menacing occurs is not right. sent5: the fact that the anadromousness but not the menace occurs is not correct. sent6: that the floundering does not occur and the orchestralness happens prevents that the craving does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the catalyzing hayrack does not occur.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: both the fingerprinting calcitonin and the fingerprinting MAOI occurs.; int1 -> int2: the fingerprinting MAOI occurs.; sent4 & sent5 -> int3: that the romping does not occur is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the orchestralness occurs is correct the craving occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fingerprinting calcitonin occurs and the fingerprinting MAOI occurs if the fact that the catalyzing hayrack does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the floundering is prevented by the catalyzing hayrack. sent3: the fact that both the anadromousness and the menacing occurs is not right. sent4: the fact that the romping does not occur is right if the fact that the anadromousness but not the menacing occurs is not right. sent5: the fact that the anadromousness but not the menace occurs is not correct. sent6: that the floundering does not occur and the orchestralness happens prevents that the craving does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the catalyzing hayrack does not occur.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: both the fingerprinting calcitonin and the fingerprinting MAOI occurs.; int1 -> int2: the fingerprinting MAOI occurs.; sent4 & sent5 -> int3: that the romping does not occur is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__