that the multiplication is a flecainide is not false.
sent1: if there is something such that it is not a steamed that the stamp subjects diocese and/or is a mural is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that something does not deprive ship and does not narrate housedog is not true it narrate housedog. sent3: if something narrates housedog then it is a salient. sent4: if that something is not proprioceptive but it is high-energy is wrong then it is not a kind of a salient. sent5: if the stamp subjects diocese then that it is an infomercial is not incorrect. sent6: the twinkler is not a kind of a toasting or it deprives ship or both if the stamp is not salient. sent7: there exists something such that it narrates housedog. sent8: if something is an infomercial the fact that it is not proprioceptive and it is high-energy does not hold. sent9: the stamp deprives ship if there exists something such that it is a flecainide and a toasting. sent10: if the twinkler is a kind of a flecainide the fact that the multiplication is a flecainide is not false. sent11: if the twinkler does deprive ship then the fact that the stamp toasts is correct. sent12: if the tanning is salient then the multiplication is not a flecainide. sent13: the twinkler deprives ship if there is something such that it does narrate housedog and it is Kiplingesque. sent14: something narrates housedog and it is a kind of a flecainide if it is not Kiplingesque. sent15: something does narrate housedog and it is Kiplingesque. sent16: something is not a kind of a steamed. sent17: there are Kiplingesque things. sent18: if the stamp does toast then the tanning is not non-salient. sent19: the fact that the twinkler is a kind of a flecainide is correct if the multiplication does deprive ship.
sent15 & sent13 -> int1: the twinkler deprives ship.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the stamp does toast.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: that the tanning is not non-salient is right.; sent12 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the multiplication is a flecainide.
sent14 -> int4: the twinkler does narrate housedog and it is a flecainide if it is not Kiplingesque.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the stamp is not salient is not false if that it is not proprioceptive but high-energy does not hold.; sent8 -> int6: that the stamp is not proprioceptive but high-energy does not hold if that it is a kind of an infomercial is not incorrect.; sent16 & sent1 -> int7: either the stamp subjects diocese or it is a mural or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the multiplication is a flecainide is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a steamed that the stamp subjects diocese and/or is a mural is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that something does not deprive ship and does not narrate housedog is not true it narrate housedog. sent3: if something narrates housedog then it is a salient. sent4: if that something is not proprioceptive but it is high-energy is wrong then it is not a kind of a salient. sent5: if the stamp subjects diocese then that it is an infomercial is not incorrect. sent6: the twinkler is not a kind of a toasting or it deprives ship or both if the stamp is not salient. sent7: there exists something such that it narrates housedog. sent8: if something is an infomercial the fact that it is not proprioceptive and it is high-energy does not hold. sent9: the stamp deprives ship if there exists something such that it is a flecainide and a toasting. sent10: if the twinkler is a kind of a flecainide the fact that the multiplication is a flecainide is not false. sent11: if the twinkler does deprive ship then the fact that the stamp toasts is correct. sent12: if the tanning is salient then the multiplication is not a flecainide. sent13: the twinkler deprives ship if there is something such that it does narrate housedog and it is Kiplingesque. sent14: something narrates housedog and it is a kind of a flecainide if it is not Kiplingesque. sent15: something does narrate housedog and it is Kiplingesque. sent16: something is not a kind of a steamed. sent17: there are Kiplingesque things. sent18: if the stamp does toast then the tanning is not non-salient. sent19: the fact that the twinkler is a kind of a flecainide is correct if the multiplication does deprive ship. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent13 -> int1: the twinkler deprives ship.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the stamp does toast.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: that the tanning is not non-salient is right.; sent12 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__