the fact that the borzoi does offset Reoviridae and it fags if the decorator is not a flex is not true.
sent1: the cabochon offsets Reoviridae if there is something such that it offsets Reoviridae and/or it scallops. sent2: if something erases then it does flex. sent3: if the cabochon does offset Reoviridae the borzoi does offset Reoviridae. sent4: the plaza is a flex that is spectrographic. sent5: the plaza does offset Fagopyrum if there is something such that it offset Fagopyrum and/or credits. sent6: the plaza offsets Fagopyrum. sent7: the plaza offsets Argyrol and it is weedless. sent8: the fact that if there exists something such that the fact that it flexes and/or it fags hold then the borzoi is a kind of a flexes hold. sent9: the borzoi erases. sent10: the borzoi is a kind of a credits. sent11: if the decorator does flex then the borzoi does offset Reoviridae and it does fag. sent12: the borzoi does erase if that the decorator is a flex but it does not offset Reoviridae does not hold. sent13: the cabochon is a kind of a Taurotragus. sent14: the cabochon offsets Reoviridae if there exists something such that it offsets Reoviridae. sent15: that the borzoi does fag is not false if the plaza does not offset Fagopyrum. sent16: the borzoi is an evidence but not a Gasterophilus. sent17: if something fags then it does erase. sent18: that the borzoi does offset Fagopyrum and does not offset Reoviridae is incorrect. sent19: the fact that the decorator erases but it does not offset Reoviridae does not hold. sent20: the cabochon is not a kind of a flex. sent21: the plaza fags. sent22: that the decorator does offset Fagopyrum but it is not a kind of a flex is not right. sent23: if that the plaza offsets Fagopyrum and is not a credits does not hold the borzoi does fag. sent24: if the plaza does offset Fagopyrum but it is not a kind of a credits the decorator does erase. sent25: the cabochon does offset Fagopyrum. sent26: there exists something such that it offsets Reoviridae or it is a scallop or both.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the plaza does offset Fagopyrum and does not credit.; sent24 & assump2 -> int1: the decorator erases.; sent2 -> int2: the decorator is a flex if it erases.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the decorator does flex.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decorator does not flex.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the plaza offsets Fagopyrum but it is not a credits does not hold.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the borzoi does fag.; sent26 & sent1 -> int7: the cabochon offsets Reoviridae.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the borzoi does offset Reoviridae.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the borzoi does offset Reoviridae and fags.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the borzoi does offset Reoviridae and it fags if the decorator is not a flex is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the cabochon offsets Reoviridae if there is something such that it offsets Reoviridae and/or it scallops. sent2: if something erases then it does flex. sent3: if the cabochon does offset Reoviridae the borzoi does offset Reoviridae. sent4: the plaza is a flex that is spectrographic. sent5: the plaza does offset Fagopyrum if there is something such that it offset Fagopyrum and/or credits. sent6: the plaza offsets Fagopyrum. sent7: the plaza offsets Argyrol and it is weedless. sent8: the fact that if there exists something such that the fact that it flexes and/or it fags hold then the borzoi is a kind of a flexes hold. sent9: the borzoi erases. sent10: the borzoi is a kind of a credits. sent11: if the decorator does flex then the borzoi does offset Reoviridae and it does fag. sent12: the borzoi does erase if that the decorator is a flex but it does not offset Reoviridae does not hold. sent13: the cabochon is a kind of a Taurotragus. sent14: the cabochon offsets Reoviridae if there exists something such that it offsets Reoviridae. sent15: that the borzoi does fag is not false if the plaza does not offset Fagopyrum. sent16: the borzoi is an evidence but not a Gasterophilus. sent17: if something fags then it does erase. sent18: that the borzoi does offset Fagopyrum and does not offset Reoviridae is incorrect. sent19: the fact that the decorator erases but it does not offset Reoviridae does not hold. sent20: the cabochon is not a kind of a flex. sent21: the plaza fags. sent22: that the decorator does offset Fagopyrum but it is not a kind of a flex is not right. sent23: if that the plaza offsets Fagopyrum and is not a credits does not hold the borzoi does fag. sent24: if the plaza does offset Fagopyrum but it is not a kind of a credits the decorator does erase. sent25: the cabochon does offset Fagopyrum. sent26: there exists something such that it offsets Reoviridae or it is a scallop or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the plaza does offset Fagopyrum and does not credit.; sent24 & assump2 -> int1: the decorator erases.; sent2 -> int2: the decorator is a flex if it erases.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the decorator does flex.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decorator does not flex.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the plaza offsets Fagopyrum but it is not a credits does not hold.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the borzoi does fag.; sent26 & sent1 -> int7: the cabochon offsets Reoviridae.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the borzoi does offset Reoviridae.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the borzoi does offset Reoviridae and fags.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__