the astronaut does not pleach Wagram.
sent1: everything rendezvous spice and is a ballyhoo. sent2: if something that does rendezvous dumbwaiter is a ballyhoo that it does not canvass is correct. sent3: the armor does render supersedure and is not a Trachurus if it is a Walkman. sent4: the delegate is not proper if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a sibilation and it is proper is not true. sent5: that if the astronaut is the Walkman then the astronaut pleaches Wagram but it is not a Trachurus is correct. sent6: if something is not cerebrospinal the fact that it is a sibilation that is proper does not hold. sent7: the armor does render supersedure and does not render astronaut. sent8: the armor is a kind of a Walkman. sent9: the agronomist renders supersedure. sent10: the armor is cadastral. sent11: if a non-brassy thing is a kind of an idolatry it is not cerebrospinal. sent12: if the armor is a Walkman then it renders supersedure. sent13: if the astronaut does pleach Wagram then it does render supersedure and it is not a Trachurus. sent14: the armor does render supersedure and is not a kind of a Walkman if it pleaches Wagram. sent15: the armor does render supersedure. sent16: either the armor pleaches Wagram or it is a Walkman or both if the delegate is not proper. sent17: if the armor pleaches Wagram the astronaut does not pleaches Wagram. sent18: the astronaut is a Trachurus if the armor pleaches Wagram but it is not a kind of a Walkman. sent19: the scope does rendezvous dumbwaiter. sent20: the astronaut pleaches Wagram if the armor does render supersedure and is not a Trachurus. sent21: something is not brassy and is an idolatry if it does not canvass.
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the armor does render supersedure but it is not a Trachurus.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the astronaut does not pleach Wagram.
sent6 -> int2: the fact that the scope is a kind of a sibilation and is proper does not hold if it is not cerebrospinal.; sent11 -> int3: if the scope is not brassy but it is an idolatry it is not cerebrospinal.; sent21 -> int4: the scope is both not brassy and an idolatry if it does not canvass.; sent2 -> int5: the scope does not canvass if the fact that it rendezvous dumbwaiter and is a ballyhoo hold.; sent1 -> int6: the scope rendezvous spice and does ballyhoo.; int6 -> int7: the scope does ballyhoo.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the scope does rendezvous dumbwaiter and is a ballyhoo.; int5 & int8 -> int9: that the scope does not canvass hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the scope is both not brassy and an idolatry.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the scope is not cerebrospinal.; int2 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the fact that the scope is a sibilation and proper is not true hold.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is both a sibilation and proper is incorrect.; int13 & sent4 -> int14: the delegate is not proper.; sent16 & int14 -> int15: the armor pleaches Wagram or it is a Walkman or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the astronaut does not pleach Wagram. ; $context$ = sent1: everything rendezvous spice and is a ballyhoo. sent2: if something that does rendezvous dumbwaiter is a ballyhoo that it does not canvass is correct. sent3: the armor does render supersedure and is not a Trachurus if it is a Walkman. sent4: the delegate is not proper if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a sibilation and it is proper is not true. sent5: that if the astronaut is the Walkman then the astronaut pleaches Wagram but it is not a Trachurus is correct. sent6: if something is not cerebrospinal the fact that it is a sibilation that is proper does not hold. sent7: the armor does render supersedure and does not render astronaut. sent8: the armor is a kind of a Walkman. sent9: the agronomist renders supersedure. sent10: the armor is cadastral. sent11: if a non-brassy thing is a kind of an idolatry it is not cerebrospinal. sent12: if the armor is a Walkman then it renders supersedure. sent13: if the astronaut does pleach Wagram then it does render supersedure and it is not a Trachurus. sent14: the armor does render supersedure and is not a kind of a Walkman if it pleaches Wagram. sent15: the armor does render supersedure. sent16: either the armor pleaches Wagram or it is a Walkman or both if the delegate is not proper. sent17: if the armor pleaches Wagram the astronaut does not pleaches Wagram. sent18: the astronaut is a Trachurus if the armor pleaches Wagram but it is not a kind of a Walkman. sent19: the scope does rendezvous dumbwaiter. sent20: the astronaut pleaches Wagram if the armor does render supersedure and is not a Trachurus. sent21: something is not brassy and is an idolatry if it does not canvass. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the armor does render supersedure but it is not a Trachurus.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__