the fact that the borsch is a Lythrum but it is not a kind of a spuriousness is not right.
sent1: something is a kind of a Decius if it does dun unlawfulness and it is not a Oregon. sent2: if something does dun retake it is a spuriousness. sent3: the pendant does rendezvous mortmain and it is a dustiness. sent4: if the sapsago is not a Oregon then the borsch is a kind of a Lythrum that is not a spuriousness. sent5: the bachelorette is a Lythrum and it does dun retake if there is something such that it is a spuriousness. sent6: the fact that the sapsago is both not capitular and archdiocesan is not right. sent7: if the bachelorette is inadvisable the fact that the ring is inadvisable and it does not dun retake is not correct. sent8: the fact that the bachelorette is not a kind of a Lythrum and it is not a dustiness is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the bachelorette is not a dustiness and is not a specific is wrong then it is not a Oregon. sent10: that the bachelorette duns unlawfulness if the fact that the sapsago is both non-capitular and archdiocesan is wrong is correct. sent11: the fact that the bachelorette is not a kind of a dustiness and it is not specific is not right. sent12: if the pendant does rendezvous mortmain and is a dustiness the borsch is not a dustiness. sent13: if the borsch is not a kind of a dustiness then the silvex is a spuriousness and it is a kind of a specific. sent14: if something is a Decius then it is inadvisable. sent15: the bachelorette does dun retake and is not a kind of a dustiness. sent16: the fact that the borsch is both a Lythrum and not a spuriousness does not hold if the silvex is not a Lythrum. sent17: something does not dun unlawfulness if that it is a kind of a Decius and/or it is not inadvisable is wrong. sent18: the fact that the willow is leaden and is not a dustiness is false. sent19: if something does dun unlawfulness it is a Lythrum. sent20: that that the ring does not pleach mezereum and is a Oregon is correct is not correct if there is something such that it does not dun unlawfulness. sent21: the fact that either the sapsago is a kind of a Decius or it is not inadvisable or both is not right if there exists something such that it duns retake. sent22: the fact that something does not dun unlawfulness but it is a kind of a Decius is not correct if it is not inadvisable. sent23: the sapsago is a kind of a Lythrum that is not capitular.
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the bachelorette does dun unlawfulness.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the bachelorette is not a kind of a Oregon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bachelorette duns unlawfulness but it is not a kind of a Oregon.; sent1 -> int4: if the bachelorette does dun unlawfulness but it is not a Oregon then the fact that it is a Decius is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bachelorette is a Decius.; sent14 -> int6: if the bachelorette is a Decius it is inadvisable.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bachelorette is inadvisable.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the fact that the ring is non-inadvisable thing that does not dun retake does not hold.;
the borsch is a kind of a Lythrum but it is not a kind of a spuriousness.
sent22 -> int9: that the bachelorette does not dun unlawfulness and is a kind of a Decius does not hold if it is not inadvisable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the borsch is a Lythrum but it is not a kind of a spuriousness is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a Decius if it does dun unlawfulness and it is not a Oregon. sent2: if something does dun retake it is a spuriousness. sent3: the pendant does rendezvous mortmain and it is a dustiness. sent4: if the sapsago is not a Oregon then the borsch is a kind of a Lythrum that is not a spuriousness. sent5: the bachelorette is a Lythrum and it does dun retake if there is something such that it is a spuriousness. sent6: the fact that the sapsago is both not capitular and archdiocesan is not right. sent7: if the bachelorette is inadvisable the fact that the ring is inadvisable and it does not dun retake is not correct. sent8: the fact that the bachelorette is not a kind of a Lythrum and it is not a dustiness is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the bachelorette is not a dustiness and is not a specific is wrong then it is not a Oregon. sent10: that the bachelorette duns unlawfulness if the fact that the sapsago is both non-capitular and archdiocesan is wrong is correct. sent11: the fact that the bachelorette is not a kind of a dustiness and it is not specific is not right. sent12: if the pendant does rendezvous mortmain and is a dustiness the borsch is not a dustiness. sent13: if the borsch is not a kind of a dustiness then the silvex is a spuriousness and it is a kind of a specific. sent14: if something is a Decius then it is inadvisable. sent15: the bachelorette does dun retake and is not a kind of a dustiness. sent16: the fact that the borsch is both a Lythrum and not a spuriousness does not hold if the silvex is not a Lythrum. sent17: something does not dun unlawfulness if that it is a kind of a Decius and/or it is not inadvisable is wrong. sent18: the fact that the willow is leaden and is not a dustiness is false. sent19: if something does dun unlawfulness it is a Lythrum. sent20: that that the ring does not pleach mezereum and is a Oregon is correct is not correct if there is something such that it does not dun unlawfulness. sent21: the fact that either the sapsago is a kind of a Decius or it is not inadvisable or both is not right if there exists something such that it duns retake. sent22: the fact that something does not dun unlawfulness but it is a kind of a Decius is not correct if it is not inadvisable. sent23: the sapsago is a kind of a Lythrum that is not capitular. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the bachelorette does dun unlawfulness.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the bachelorette is not a kind of a Oregon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bachelorette duns unlawfulness but it is not a kind of a Oregon.; sent1 -> int4: if the bachelorette does dun unlawfulness but it is not a Oregon then the fact that it is a Decius is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bachelorette is a Decius.; sent14 -> int6: if the bachelorette is a Decius it is inadvisable.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bachelorette is inadvisable.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the fact that the ring is non-inadvisable thing that does not dun retake does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__