the diazonium is a cakewalk.
sent1: something is not nonmodern if it is not a kind of an endgame and it is a Haemulidae. sent2: if something does fry and is a kind of a epinephrine it is not a kind of a cakewalk. sent3: the fact that the stickpin does not fry is not false if the diazonium is not a cakewalk and is a lovage. sent4: something is not an endgame but it is a Haemulidae if it is not a brakes. sent5: if the stickpin does not wrap existentialism that it is unapologetic and a brakes is wrong. sent6: if the doorlock is a kind of an endgame and/or it does not brake the stickpin is not a kind of a Haemulidae. sent7: the doorlock is a epinephrine. sent8: the diazonium does wrap existentialism but it is not a kind of an oceanographer. sent9: the diazonium does not brake if the fact that the stickpin is both unapologetic and a brake is not right. sent10: the diazonium is a kind of a cakewalk if it does fry. sent11: something does fry and is a epinephrine if it is not nonmodern. sent12: something is a kind of an endgame and/or it is not a kind of a brakes if the fact that it is not unapologetic is not incorrect. sent13: the diazonium hungers demobilization. sent14: the doorlock is not unapologetic if the diazonium wraps existentialism but it is not an oceanographer. sent15: if the stickpin is not a thaneship but it is a lovage the doorlock is not a epinephrine. sent16: if there exists something such that it is not a Haemulidae the Macedonian is a kind of a epinephrine that is nonmodern. sent17: something fries if the fact that it is a epinephrine hold. sent18: if that the fact that the stickpin is not a thaneship but it is a lovage hold does not hold then the diazonium fries. sent19: the diazonium is a thaneship.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stickpin is both not a thaneship and a lovage.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the doorlock is not a epinephrine.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the stickpin is not a thaneship but it is a lovage does not hold is not wrong.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the diazonium fries.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Macedonian is a cakewalk.
sent17 -> int5: the Macedonian does fry if it is a epinephrine.; sent12 -> int6: the doorlock is an endgame and/or it is not a brakes if it is not unapologetic.; sent14 & sent8 -> int7: the doorlock is not unapologetic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the doorlock either is an endgame or does not brake or both.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the stickpin is not a Haemulidae.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Haemulidae.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the Macedonian is a epinephrine and it is nonmodern.; int11 -> int12: that the Macedonian is a epinephrine is right.; int5 & int12 -> int13: that the Macedonian does fry is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the diazonium is a cakewalk. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not nonmodern if it is not a kind of an endgame and it is a Haemulidae. sent2: if something does fry and is a kind of a epinephrine it is not a kind of a cakewalk. sent3: the fact that the stickpin does not fry is not false if the diazonium is not a cakewalk and is a lovage. sent4: something is not an endgame but it is a Haemulidae if it is not a brakes. sent5: if the stickpin does not wrap existentialism that it is unapologetic and a brakes is wrong. sent6: if the doorlock is a kind of an endgame and/or it does not brake the stickpin is not a kind of a Haemulidae. sent7: the doorlock is a epinephrine. sent8: the diazonium does wrap existentialism but it is not a kind of an oceanographer. sent9: the diazonium does not brake if the fact that the stickpin is both unapologetic and a brake is not right. sent10: the diazonium is a kind of a cakewalk if it does fry. sent11: something does fry and is a epinephrine if it is not nonmodern. sent12: something is a kind of an endgame and/or it is not a kind of a brakes if the fact that it is not unapologetic is not incorrect. sent13: the diazonium hungers demobilization. sent14: the doorlock is not unapologetic if the diazonium wraps existentialism but it is not an oceanographer. sent15: if the stickpin is not a thaneship but it is a lovage the doorlock is not a epinephrine. sent16: if there exists something such that it is not a Haemulidae the Macedonian is a kind of a epinephrine that is nonmodern. sent17: something fries if the fact that it is a epinephrine hold. sent18: if that the fact that the stickpin is not a thaneship but it is a lovage hold does not hold then the diazonium fries. sent19: the diazonium is a thaneship. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stickpin is both not a thaneship and a lovage.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the doorlock is not a epinephrine.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the stickpin is not a thaneship but it is a lovage does not hold is not wrong.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the diazonium fries.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__