the emaciating occurs.
sent1: if the fact that the nosohusialness does not occur and the pipeline occurs does not hold the Sarawakian does not occur. sent2: that the emaciating happens and the vibrationalness occurs is triggered by that the incurvation does not occur. sent3: if the vibrationalness and the incurvation occurs then the shillyshallying Wernicke does not occur. sent4: that the vibrationalness does not occur is prevented by the emaciating. sent5: that the lick does not occur prevents that the incurvation does not occur. sent6: not the incurvation but the shillyshallying Wernicke occurs if the lick happens. sent7: the licking does not occur. sent8: that the devoicing Orizaba happens is not incorrect. sent9: the shillyshallying Wernicke happens. sent10: the fact that the shillyshallying Wernicke happens and the lick occurs does not hold if the Sarawakianness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emaciating happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the vibrationalness happens is not wrong.; sent5 & sent7 -> int2: the incurvation occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the vibrationalness happens and the incurvation happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the shillyshallying Wernicke does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the emaciating occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the emaciating occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the nosohusialness does not occur and the pipeline occurs does not hold the Sarawakian does not occur. sent2: that the emaciating happens and the vibrationalness occurs is triggered by that the incurvation does not occur. sent3: if the vibrationalness and the incurvation occurs then the shillyshallying Wernicke does not occur. sent4: that the vibrationalness does not occur is prevented by the emaciating. sent5: that the lick does not occur prevents that the incurvation does not occur. sent6: not the incurvation but the shillyshallying Wernicke occurs if the lick happens. sent7: the licking does not occur. sent8: that the devoicing Orizaba happens is not incorrect. sent9: the shillyshallying Wernicke happens. sent10: the fact that the shillyshallying Wernicke happens and the lick occurs does not hold if the Sarawakianness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emaciating happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the vibrationalness happens is not wrong.; sent5 & sent7 -> int2: the incurvation occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the vibrationalness happens and the incurvation happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the shillyshallying Wernicke does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__