the fact that that the dangerousness occurs is prevented by that the curacy happens is false.
sent1: the Benedictine does not occur. sent2: the dangerousness occurs if the curacy occurs. sent3: the non-dangerousness is brought about by that both the cretaceousness and the curacy occurs. sent4: that the deticking volcano does not occur is true. sent5: the lectureship happens if the bottle occurs. sent6: both the incorporation and the rummaging occurs. sent7: if that either the rummage does not occur or the dangerousness happens or both does not hold then the cretaceousness does not occur. sent8: if that not the bottling but the incorporation occurs is not wrong then the cretaceousness happens. sent9: the fact that the Wilsonianness happens is correct. sent10: if both the cretaceousness and the curacy occurs the dangerousness occurs. sent11: the dangerousness occurs. sent12: the bottle does not occur if that the deticking volcano does not occur is true. sent13: the rummaging occurs. sent14: both the summarizing polygraph and the biblioticsness happens. sent15: the strafe happens.
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the bottling does not occur.; sent6 -> int2: the incorporation occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bottle does not occur and the incorporation happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the cretaceousness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the curacy occurs is correct.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the cretaceousness and the curacy occurs.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the dangerousness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the lectureship occurs and the nastiness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the dangerousness occurs is prevented by that the curacy happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the Benedictine does not occur. sent2: the dangerousness occurs if the curacy occurs. sent3: the non-dangerousness is brought about by that both the cretaceousness and the curacy occurs. sent4: that the deticking volcano does not occur is true. sent5: the lectureship happens if the bottle occurs. sent6: both the incorporation and the rummaging occurs. sent7: if that either the rummage does not occur or the dangerousness happens or both does not hold then the cretaceousness does not occur. sent8: if that not the bottling but the incorporation occurs is not wrong then the cretaceousness happens. sent9: the fact that the Wilsonianness happens is correct. sent10: if both the cretaceousness and the curacy occurs the dangerousness occurs. sent11: the dangerousness occurs. sent12: the bottle does not occur if that the deticking volcano does not occur is true. sent13: the rummaging occurs. sent14: both the summarizing polygraph and the biblioticsness happens. sent15: the strafe happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the bottling does not occur.; sent6 -> int2: the incorporation occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bottle does not occur and the incorporation happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the cretaceousness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the curacy occurs is correct.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the cretaceousness and the curacy occurs.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the dangerousness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__