the tome is opisthognathous.
sent1: something does not demineralize adversary if the fact that it either does not endeavor or is not an extravaganza or both does not hold. sent2: if that the voltage endeavors and it is a cuff is false then the incendiary does not demineralize adversary. sent3: if that the pumice is a palace and straps widowed is wrong the incendiary does not cuff. sent4: if that the fact that the voltage does not endeavor and/or it is a kind of an extravaganza is not correct is correct then that it does not demineralize adversary is not false. sent5: the fact that the pumice is not a cuff and/or is not a palace does not hold. sent6: the fact that the pumice is a palace and does strap widowed is not true. sent7: something does not demineralize adversary if that it does not endeavor and/or it is an extravaganza is not correct. sent8: the fact that the ecologist is a colorcast is not incorrect. sent9: if the voltage does not demineralize adversary then that the ecologist is a colorcast but it does not demineralize adversary is correct. sent10: the voltage is a kind of an extravaganza if the incendiary is not a cuff. sent11: the fact that the tome is not opisthognathous is not wrong if the ecologist is a kind of a colorcast that does not demineralize adversary. sent12: if the incendiary does not cuff the fact that the voltage either does not endeavor or is not an extravaganza or both is wrong. sent13: if the fact that something is an extravaganza or it is not a colorcast or both is wrong the fact that it does not endeavor is not incorrect. sent14: the voltage is an extravaganza. sent15: if that the voltage does not demineralize adversary is not false then the ecologist is a colorcast. sent16: something is not a kind of a palace if the fact that it is not a kind of a colorcast and/or is a kind of an extravaganza is not correct.
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the incendiary is not a kind of a cuff.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that either the voltage does not endeavor or it is not an extravaganza or both is false.; sent1 -> int3: the voltage does not demineralize adversary if the fact that it does not endeavor or it is not an extravaganza or both is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the voltage does not demineralize adversary hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the ecologist does colorcast but it does not demineralize adversary.; int5 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the tome is opisthognathous. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not demineralize adversary if the fact that it either does not endeavor or is not an extravaganza or both does not hold. sent2: if that the voltage endeavors and it is a cuff is false then the incendiary does not demineralize adversary. sent3: if that the pumice is a palace and straps widowed is wrong the incendiary does not cuff. sent4: if that the fact that the voltage does not endeavor and/or it is a kind of an extravaganza is not correct is correct then that it does not demineralize adversary is not false. sent5: the fact that the pumice is not a cuff and/or is not a palace does not hold. sent6: the fact that the pumice is a palace and does strap widowed is not true. sent7: something does not demineralize adversary if that it does not endeavor and/or it is an extravaganza is not correct. sent8: the fact that the ecologist is a colorcast is not incorrect. sent9: if the voltage does not demineralize adversary then that the ecologist is a colorcast but it does not demineralize adversary is correct. sent10: the voltage is a kind of an extravaganza if the incendiary is not a cuff. sent11: the fact that the tome is not opisthognathous is not wrong if the ecologist is a kind of a colorcast that does not demineralize adversary. sent12: if the incendiary does not cuff the fact that the voltage either does not endeavor or is not an extravaganza or both is wrong. sent13: if the fact that something is an extravaganza or it is not a colorcast or both is wrong the fact that it does not endeavor is not incorrect. sent14: the voltage is an extravaganza. sent15: if that the voltage does not demineralize adversary is not false then the ecologist is a colorcast. sent16: something is not a kind of a palace if the fact that it is not a kind of a colorcast and/or is a kind of an extravaganza is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the incendiary is not a kind of a cuff.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that either the voltage does not endeavor or it is not an extravaganza or both is false.; sent1 -> int3: the voltage does not demineralize adversary if the fact that it does not endeavor or it is not an extravaganza or both is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the voltage does not demineralize adversary hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the ecologist does colorcast but it does not demineralize adversary.; int5 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__