that the outpost is a longwool is not wrong.
sent1: something disentangles if it is Vedic. sent2: something disentangles if the fact that it is not Vedic and is not fresh does not hold. sent3: the Lamb is a gentile if it does disentangle. sent4: something is not gentile if it is not imprudent and it is electrochemical. sent5: if something does not fudge intermezzo it is prudent and it is electrochemical. sent6: that the Amhara is Vedic hold. sent7: if the outpost is a longwool then that the Lamb is Vedic but it is not fresh is not right. sent8: if the fact that the Lamb is a kind of a gentile is not wrong then it is electrochemical. sent9: if the outpost is a Spam it is a kind of a whalebone. sent10: the borough is a gentile. sent11: if the Lamb is Vedic then the fact that it disentangles is not incorrect. sent12: if the outpost is a longwool that the fact that the Lamb is not Vedic and is not fresh is correct does not hold. sent13: something is Vedic if that it is both not a gentile and not electrochemical is not true. sent14: if the Lamb is prudent it is electrochemical and it is not gentile. sent15: the Lamb is not electrochemical. sent16: that the Lamb is Vedic but it is non-fresh does not hold. sent17: the outpost is not electrochemical. sent18: the outpost does not fudge intermezzo if the Lamb is both a Dawson and not syncarpous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the outpost is a kind of a longwool.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the Lamb is not Vedic and it is not fresh is not true.; sent2 -> int2: the Lamb disentangles if the fact that it is not Vedic and not fresh is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Lamb disentangles.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the Lamb is not non-gentile.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the Lamb is electrochemical.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the outpost is a longwool.
sent4 -> int7: the outpost is non-gentile if it is prudent and is electrochemical.; sent5 -> int8: if the fact that the outpost does not fudge intermezzo hold then it is prudent and it is electrochemical.;
$hypothesis$ = that the outpost is a longwool is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something disentangles if it is Vedic. sent2: something disentangles if the fact that it is not Vedic and is not fresh does not hold. sent3: the Lamb is a gentile if it does disentangle. sent4: something is not gentile if it is not imprudent and it is electrochemical. sent5: if something does not fudge intermezzo it is prudent and it is electrochemical. sent6: that the Amhara is Vedic hold. sent7: if the outpost is a longwool then that the Lamb is Vedic but it is not fresh is not right. sent8: if the fact that the Lamb is a kind of a gentile is not wrong then it is electrochemical. sent9: if the outpost is a Spam it is a kind of a whalebone. sent10: the borough is a gentile. sent11: if the Lamb is Vedic then the fact that it disentangles is not incorrect. sent12: if the outpost is a longwool that the fact that the Lamb is not Vedic and is not fresh is correct does not hold. sent13: something is Vedic if that it is both not a gentile and not electrochemical is not true. sent14: if the Lamb is prudent it is electrochemical and it is not gentile. sent15: the Lamb is not electrochemical. sent16: that the Lamb is Vedic but it is non-fresh does not hold. sent17: the outpost is not electrochemical. sent18: the outpost does not fudge intermezzo if the Lamb is both a Dawson and not syncarpous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the outpost is a kind of a longwool.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the Lamb is not Vedic and it is not fresh is not true.; sent2 -> int2: the Lamb disentangles if the fact that it is not Vedic and not fresh is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Lamb disentangles.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the Lamb is not non-gentile.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the Lamb is electrochemical.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__