the tumbler is not unsatisfactory.
sent1: if the plunderer is vacuolate then the Pullman mushes wee. sent2: if the tumbler is intractable and it is unsatisfactory then the Pullman does not mush wee. sent3: if there is something such that that it is not a clary is true the tumbler is intractable and it is a antipasto. sent4: if the plunderer is not a antipasto then the Pullman is not intractable and/or it does mush wee. sent5: something is not intractable if it is not intractable and/or it mushes wee. sent6: if the Nut is a kind of a dinocerate then the provitamin is not incomprehensible. sent7: the Nut is a dinocerate and/or it is not a kind of a parang. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a clary. sent9: if the provitamin is not incomprehensible that the cud is a antipasto and it is vacuolate is false.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the tumbler is intractable and it is a antipasto.; int1 -> int2: the tumbler is intractable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tumbler is unsatisfactory is not wrong.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the tumbler is intractable and unsatisfactory.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Pullman does not mush wee.;
that the tumbler is unsatisfactory is correct.
sent5 -> int5: if the Pullman is tractable and/or it mushes wee it is not tractable.;
$hypothesis$ = the tumbler is not unsatisfactory. ; $context$ = sent1: if the plunderer is vacuolate then the Pullman mushes wee. sent2: if the tumbler is intractable and it is unsatisfactory then the Pullman does not mush wee. sent3: if there is something such that that it is not a clary is true the tumbler is intractable and it is a antipasto. sent4: if the plunderer is not a antipasto then the Pullman is not intractable and/or it does mush wee. sent5: something is not intractable if it is not intractable and/or it mushes wee. sent6: if the Nut is a kind of a dinocerate then the provitamin is not incomprehensible. sent7: the Nut is a dinocerate and/or it is not a kind of a parang. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a clary. sent9: if the provitamin is not incomprehensible that the cud is a antipasto and it is vacuolate is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the tumbler is intractable and it is a antipasto.; int1 -> int2: the tumbler is intractable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tumbler is unsatisfactory is not wrong.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the tumbler is intractable and unsatisfactory.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Pullman does not mush wee.; __UNKNOWN__