the fact that the Chickasaw is not substantive is right.
sent1: if the Chickasaw is a kind of a pibroch the mosaic is a kind of substantive thing that is not a kind of a pibroch. sent2: that the conch is a Tussaud that is not caffeinic does not hold if it is not a kind of a delight. sent3: that the ropewalk does mask dilation and it does bawl dandy is not correct if the egotist is not a kind of a Thiosulfil. sent4: something does mask Gracilariidae and it sensualizes function if that the fact that it bawls jihad is incorrect is true. sent5: if the fact that the ropewalk does mask dilation and it does bawl dandy does not hold then the Chickasaw does not mask dilation. sent6: the scholar does not mask dilation if something is not a pibroch and/or it is not a kind of a Thiosulfil. sent7: if something that does mask Gracilariidae sensualizes function then it does not bawl Labrador. sent8: if the ropewalk is a pibroch the egotist does mask dilation. sent9: if something is not a Tussaud then the fact that it does not sensualize conch and it is not a billow does not hold. sent10: the mosaic does not bawl dandy or does mask dilation or both. sent11: the conch is not a delight. sent12: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Tussaud that is not caffeinic does not hold the mosaic is not a Tussaud. sent13: the fact that the scholar is a kind of a Thiosulfil and does not mask dilation is not true. sent14: the sodium does mask dilation and is not a whale. sent15: if the ropewalk is not a pibroch the mosaic is a pibroch that does not bawl dandy. sent16: the ropewalk is a kind of a Thiosulfil. sent17: if the ropewalk is not a Thiosulfil and/or does not bawl dandy the mosaic is a pibroch. sent18: the Chickasaw is a kind of a pibroch but it does not bawl dandy if the fact that the mosaic is not a kind of a pibroch is not incorrect. sent19: the egotist is a Thiosulfil. sent20: there is something such that it is not a kind of a pibroch and/or bawls Labrador. sent21: something is a substantive and it is a pibroch if it does not mask dilation. sent22: the Chickasaw is not a substantive if there exists something such that it does not bawl Labrador or it does not bawl dandy or both. sent23: the mosaic is not a pibroch and/or it masks dilation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ropewalk is a kind of a pibroch.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the egotist masks dilation.;
that the mosaic does mask dilation is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Chickasaw is not substantive is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Chickasaw is a kind of a pibroch the mosaic is a kind of substantive thing that is not a kind of a pibroch. sent2: that the conch is a Tussaud that is not caffeinic does not hold if it is not a kind of a delight. sent3: that the ropewalk does mask dilation and it does bawl dandy is not correct if the egotist is not a kind of a Thiosulfil. sent4: something does mask Gracilariidae and it sensualizes function if that the fact that it bawls jihad is incorrect is true. sent5: if the fact that the ropewalk does mask dilation and it does bawl dandy does not hold then the Chickasaw does not mask dilation. sent6: the scholar does not mask dilation if something is not a pibroch and/or it is not a kind of a Thiosulfil. sent7: if something that does mask Gracilariidae sensualizes function then it does not bawl Labrador. sent8: if the ropewalk is a pibroch the egotist does mask dilation. sent9: if something is not a Tussaud then the fact that it does not sensualize conch and it is not a billow does not hold. sent10: the mosaic does not bawl dandy or does mask dilation or both. sent11: the conch is not a delight. sent12: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Tussaud that is not caffeinic does not hold the mosaic is not a Tussaud. sent13: the fact that the scholar is a kind of a Thiosulfil and does not mask dilation is not true. sent14: the sodium does mask dilation and is not a whale. sent15: if the ropewalk is not a pibroch the mosaic is a pibroch that does not bawl dandy. sent16: the ropewalk is a kind of a Thiosulfil. sent17: if the ropewalk is not a Thiosulfil and/or does not bawl dandy the mosaic is a pibroch. sent18: the Chickasaw is a kind of a pibroch but it does not bawl dandy if the fact that the mosaic is not a kind of a pibroch is not incorrect. sent19: the egotist is a Thiosulfil. sent20: there is something such that it is not a kind of a pibroch and/or bawls Labrador. sent21: something is a substantive and it is a pibroch if it does not mask dilation. sent22: the Chickasaw is not a substantive if there exists something such that it does not bawl Labrador or it does not bawl dandy or both. sent23: the mosaic is not a pibroch and/or it masks dilation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ropewalk is a kind of a pibroch.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the egotist masks dilation.; __UNKNOWN__