that if the bowfin is not the rummage the bowfin is antonymous and does not coffin Victoriana is false.
sent1: if the bowfin is antonymous thing that does not coffin Victoriana it is a kind of a rummage. sent2: the bowfin does not coffin Victoriana. sent3: everything is not a kind of a lumpsucker. sent4: the bowfin does rummage if the fact that it is antonymous thing that does not coffin Victoriana is not correct. sent5: if that the fact that something is a kind of non-biflagellate a rummage is not wrong is incorrect the fact that it is unitary is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the bowfin is a rheometer but it does not coffin Victoriana does not hold. sent7: if the bowfin does not rummage then it does not coffin Victoriana. sent8: if that something does coffin beanfeast but it is not a terminology is incorrect it is a kind of a locator. sent9: if the bowfin does not load bowfin it is a kind of a ignorantness and it is antonymous. sent10: the spectinomycin is a hoydenism but it is not a hangnail. sent11: that the fact that the photoconductivity gets and is non-Ecuadorian does not hold if the bowfin is unitary is correct. sent12: that something does coffin beanfeast but it is not a kind of a terminology is false if it is not a kind of a lumpsucker. sent13: the bowfin is not tangible if that it does not rummage is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bowfin is antonymous and does not coffin Victoriana is incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the bowfin rummages.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bowfin is not a kind of a rummage.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the bowfin is antonymous but it does not coffin Victoriana.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the photoconductivity does get and is not a Ecuadorian is incorrect.
sent5 -> int4: the bowfin is unitary if that it is non-biflagellate thing that rummages does not hold.; sent8 -> int5: if that the suppository does coffin beanfeast but it is not a terminology does not hold then it is a locator.; sent12 -> int6: if the suppository is not a lumpsucker that it coffins beanfeast and is not a terminology does not hold.; sent3 -> int7: the suppository is not a lumpsucker.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the suppository does coffin beanfeast and is not a kind of a terminology is false.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the suppository is a kind of a locator.; int9 -> int10: something is a locator.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the bowfin is not the rummage the bowfin is antonymous and does not coffin Victoriana is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bowfin is antonymous thing that does not coffin Victoriana it is a kind of a rummage. sent2: the bowfin does not coffin Victoriana. sent3: everything is not a kind of a lumpsucker. sent4: the bowfin does rummage if the fact that it is antonymous thing that does not coffin Victoriana is not correct. sent5: if that the fact that something is a kind of non-biflagellate a rummage is not wrong is incorrect the fact that it is unitary is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the bowfin is a rheometer but it does not coffin Victoriana does not hold. sent7: if the bowfin does not rummage then it does not coffin Victoriana. sent8: if that something does coffin beanfeast but it is not a terminology is incorrect it is a kind of a locator. sent9: if the bowfin does not load bowfin it is a kind of a ignorantness and it is antonymous. sent10: the spectinomycin is a hoydenism but it is not a hangnail. sent11: that the fact that the photoconductivity gets and is non-Ecuadorian does not hold if the bowfin is unitary is correct. sent12: that something does coffin beanfeast but it is not a kind of a terminology is false if it is not a kind of a lumpsucker. sent13: the bowfin is not tangible if that it does not rummage is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bowfin is antonymous and does not coffin Victoriana is incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the bowfin rummages.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bowfin is not a kind of a rummage.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the bowfin is antonymous but it does not coffin Victoriana.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__