the primrose is a spillway that interlocks peripatetic.
sent1: the primrose does interlock tuberosity. sent2: something is a kind of a spillway if it is not biochemical and does interlock peripatetic. sent3: the ornithine is not achromatinic if that that either the contrapuntist is not achromatinic or it is not botryoid or both is not wrong is not correct. sent4: the primrose is a kind of a spillway. sent5: the Eyeish is a intemperance and does jumble Caravaggio. sent6: if that something does ovulate and it tinkles ornithine is not right it is not biochemical. sent7: the primrose does interlock peripatetic. sent8: if the fact that the ornithine is not achromatinic is not wrong then the fact that it does ovulate and tinkles ornithine is not true. sent9: The peripatetic does interlock primrose.
sent4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the primrose is a kind of a spillway and does interlock peripatetic does not hold.
sent6 -> int1: the ornithine is not biochemical if the fact that it does ovulate and does tinkle ornithine is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the primrose is a spillway that interlocks peripatetic. ; $context$ = sent1: the primrose does interlock tuberosity. sent2: something is a kind of a spillway if it is not biochemical and does interlock peripatetic. sent3: the ornithine is not achromatinic if that that either the contrapuntist is not achromatinic or it is not botryoid or both is not wrong is not correct. sent4: the primrose is a kind of a spillway. sent5: the Eyeish is a intemperance and does jumble Caravaggio. sent6: if that something does ovulate and it tinkles ornithine is not right it is not biochemical. sent7: the primrose does interlock peripatetic. sent8: if the fact that the ornithine is not achromatinic is not wrong then the fact that it does ovulate and tinkles ornithine is not true. sent9: The peripatetic does interlock primrose. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__