that the bar is not a special and stunts Sorensen does not hold.
sent1: that the bar is a kind of a special and stunts Sorensen is incorrect if the Plectophera unseals creationism. sent2: if that something is Caesarian is true then it is a consumptive. sent3: if the chess is a Ancohuma that the pfannkuchen is not a continence and it does not bankrupt abdomen is not right. sent4: the peludo does not stunt Sorensen. sent5: if something is not non-consumptive it does unseal creationism. sent6: the chess is a special if the bar is Caesarian. sent7: the Plectophera is a double-bogey that is not a kickstand. sent8: if the Plectophera unseals creationism that the bar is not a special and stunts Sorensen does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it is both not hydrostatics and not a yardage. sent10: that the bar is not a kind of a spadix and stunts Sorensen does not hold if the fact that the pfannkuchen is a Ancohuma is not incorrect. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not hydrostatics and it is not a yardage does not hold. sent12: the pfannkuchen is a hall and it is a kind of a spadix. sent13: the Plectophera does stunt Sorensen. sent14: if the bar is a kind of a Ancohuma that the pfannkuchen is a hall and it does stunt Sorensen is not right. sent15: the pfannkuchen is not a Ancohuma if there is something such that that it is not hydrostatics and not a yardage is false. sent16: the pfannkuchen is not a Ancohuma if there exists something such that it is hydrostatics. sent17: if the chess is Caesarian then the Plectophera is a consumptive. sent18: the fact that the pfannkuchen is a spadix and it does unseal creationism does not hold if the Plectophera is a consumptive. sent19: the pfannkuchen is a spadix. sent20: if that either the pfannkuchen is a hall or it is Caesarian or both does not hold then the bar is not a Ancohuma.
sent11 & sent15 -> int1: the pfannkuchen is not a Ancohuma.; sent12 -> int2: the pfannkuchen is a hall.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pfannkuchen is a hall that is not a Ancohuma.; sent5 -> int4: the Plectophera does unseal creationism if it is a consumptive.;
there exists something such that the fact that it is not a continence and it does not bankrupt abdomen is not right.
$hypothesis$ = that the bar is not a special and stunts Sorensen does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bar is a kind of a special and stunts Sorensen is incorrect if the Plectophera unseals creationism. sent2: if that something is Caesarian is true then it is a consumptive. sent3: if the chess is a Ancohuma that the pfannkuchen is not a continence and it does not bankrupt abdomen is not right. sent4: the peludo does not stunt Sorensen. sent5: if something is not non-consumptive it does unseal creationism. sent6: the chess is a special if the bar is Caesarian. sent7: the Plectophera is a double-bogey that is not a kickstand. sent8: if the Plectophera unseals creationism that the bar is not a special and stunts Sorensen does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it is both not hydrostatics and not a yardage. sent10: that the bar is not a kind of a spadix and stunts Sorensen does not hold if the fact that the pfannkuchen is a Ancohuma is not incorrect. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not hydrostatics and it is not a yardage does not hold. sent12: the pfannkuchen is a hall and it is a kind of a spadix. sent13: the Plectophera does stunt Sorensen. sent14: if the bar is a kind of a Ancohuma that the pfannkuchen is a hall and it does stunt Sorensen is not right. sent15: the pfannkuchen is not a Ancohuma if there is something such that that it is not hydrostatics and not a yardage is false. sent16: the pfannkuchen is not a Ancohuma if there exists something such that it is hydrostatics. sent17: if the chess is Caesarian then the Plectophera is a consumptive. sent18: the fact that the pfannkuchen is a spadix and it does unseal creationism does not hold if the Plectophera is a consumptive. sent19: the pfannkuchen is a spadix. sent20: if that either the pfannkuchen is a hall or it is Caesarian or both does not hold then the bar is not a Ancohuma. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent15 -> int1: the pfannkuchen is not a Ancohuma.; sent12 -> int2: the pfannkuchen is a hall.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pfannkuchen is a hall that is not a Ancohuma.; sent5 -> int4: the Plectophera does unseal creationism if it is a consumptive.; __UNKNOWN__