the fact that the insulation but not the risk happens is true.
sent1: the easter does not occur if the Monacanness does not occur and the bigness does not occur. sent2: the loom does not occur. sent3: that the bulge but not the risking happens is caused by that the loom does not occur. sent4: that both the Monacanness and the bigness occurs is not correct. sent5: if the cropping glaze does not occur the bulging and the looming occurs. sent6: if the fact that the Monacanness and the non-bigness occurs does not hold then the insulation occurs. sent7: the bulging occurs. sent8: the bigness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Monacanness does not occur is correct. sent10: if the bigness happens the insulation happens. sent11: that the prickling does not occur leads to that not the cropping glaze but the crossing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Monacanness and the non-bigness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: that the Monacanness occurs is not incorrect.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Monacanness occurs but the bigness does not occur is wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the insulation occurs.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the bulging happens and the risking does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the risking does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the easter does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the insulation but not the risk happens is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the easter does not occur if the Monacanness does not occur and the bigness does not occur. sent2: the loom does not occur. sent3: that the bulge but not the risking happens is caused by that the loom does not occur. sent4: that both the Monacanness and the bigness occurs is not correct. sent5: if the cropping glaze does not occur the bulging and the looming occurs. sent6: if the fact that the Monacanness and the non-bigness occurs does not hold then the insulation occurs. sent7: the bulging occurs. sent8: the bigness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Monacanness does not occur is correct. sent10: if the bigness happens the insulation happens. sent11: that the prickling does not occur leads to that not the cropping glaze but the crossing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Monacanness and the non-bigness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: that the Monacanness occurs is not incorrect.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Monacanness occurs but the bigness does not occur is wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the insulation occurs.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the bulging happens and the risking does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the risking does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__