the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a singular then that it orchestrates Draco and it does not hunger rat is not right is not right.
sent1: if the suprematist is a singular then the fact that it orchestrates Draco and does not hunger rat is wrong. sent2: the fact that the suprematist is a kind of a Conocarpus and is not a kind of a cacique does not hold if it hungers rat. sent3: if the Brahma is a Tyrannidae it is liturgical thing that is not vicarial. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a singular is not wrong it orchestrates Draco and it does not hunger rat. sent5: there is something such that if it does blinker Brahma then the fact that it is tamed thing that does not orchestrate born does not hold. sent6: the suprematist does orchestrate Draco and does not hunger rat if it is a kind of a singular.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a singular then that it orchestrates Draco and it does not hunger rat is not right is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the suprematist is a singular then the fact that it orchestrates Draco and does not hunger rat is wrong. sent2: the fact that the suprematist is a kind of a Conocarpus and is not a kind of a cacique does not hold if it hungers rat. sent3: if the Brahma is a Tyrannidae it is liturgical thing that is not vicarial. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a singular is not wrong it orchestrates Draco and it does not hunger rat. sent5: there is something such that if it does blinker Brahma then the fact that it is tamed thing that does not orchestrate born does not hold. sent6: the suprematist does orchestrate Draco and does not hunger rat if it is a kind of a singular. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__