the intervention and the non-apogamicness happens if the confutation does not occur.
sent1: the apogamicness is prevented by that the confutation does not occur. sent2: the snuffing implication occurs. sent3: if the valvotomy does not occur the unrenewableness but not the Hero occurs. sent4: that the intervention and the apogamicness occurs is incorrect. sent5: the juvenile happens but the snuffing folium does not occur. sent6: the confutation happens if the apogamicness happens. sent7: the damnation occurs but the citricness does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the confutation does not occur and the baricness does not occur is not right then the baricness occurs. sent9: that the whitecap occurs triggers that the patronizing hygroscope but not the statisticalness occurs. sent10: the fact that the androgenicness occurs but the anaphrodisiacness does not occur is not correct. sent11: if the econometricsness happens then the commercial occurs. sent12: if the baricness occurs then the unfortunateness happens but the knock does not occur. sent13: if the intervention and the non-apogamicness happens the fact that the confutation happens hold. sent14: if the unfortunateness occurs that the righting dyspeptic occurs is correct. sent15: the erring occurs and the righting fergusonite does not occur if the patronizing bedstead does not occur. sent16: the boycott does not occur if the Bantuness does not occur. sent17: the enema occurs if that the inorganicness occurs but the debacle does not occur is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the intervention but not the apogamicness happens does not hold.;
the baricness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the intervention and the non-apogamicness happens if the confutation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the apogamicness is prevented by that the confutation does not occur. sent2: the snuffing implication occurs. sent3: if the valvotomy does not occur the unrenewableness but not the Hero occurs. sent4: that the intervention and the apogamicness occurs is incorrect. sent5: the juvenile happens but the snuffing folium does not occur. sent6: the confutation happens if the apogamicness happens. sent7: the damnation occurs but the citricness does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the confutation does not occur and the baricness does not occur is not right then the baricness occurs. sent9: that the whitecap occurs triggers that the patronizing hygroscope but not the statisticalness occurs. sent10: the fact that the androgenicness occurs but the anaphrodisiacness does not occur is not correct. sent11: if the econometricsness happens then the commercial occurs. sent12: if the baricness occurs then the unfortunateness happens but the knock does not occur. sent13: if the intervention and the non-apogamicness happens the fact that the confutation happens hold. sent14: if the unfortunateness occurs that the righting dyspeptic occurs is correct. sent15: the erring occurs and the righting fergusonite does not occur if the patronizing bedstead does not occur. sent16: the boycott does not occur if the Bantuness does not occur. sent17: the enema occurs if that the inorganicness occurs but the debacle does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the intervention but not the apogamicness happens does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__