that not the pilferage but the combinativeness occurs is not true.
sent1: the burglary and the couvade occurs. sent2: that the capillarity does not occur is caused by that the burglary occurs and the couvade occurs. sent3: the fact that the pilferage and the combinativeness occurs is false. sent4: the capillarity happens if the fact that the pilferage does not occur but the combinativeness occurs does not hold. sent5: the couvade happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the pilferage but the combinativeness occurs is not right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the capillarity occurs.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the capillarity does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that not the pilferage but the combinativeness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the burglary and the couvade occurs. sent2: that the capillarity does not occur is caused by that the burglary occurs and the couvade occurs. sent3: the fact that the pilferage and the combinativeness occurs is false. sent4: the capillarity happens if the fact that the pilferage does not occur but the combinativeness occurs does not hold. sent5: the couvade happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the pilferage but the combinativeness occurs is not right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the capillarity occurs.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the capillarity does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__