that there exists something such that if it does not measure anthem then the fact that it is unprotective and measures lipase is not right is incorrect.
sent1: if the waterproof is full the fact that it does syllogize deacon and is unprotective is wrong. sent2: if the sorceress is not Shuha then the fact that that it is a local and does measure lipase hold is false. sent3: the waterproof is unprotective and it does measure lipase if that it does not measure anthem is correct. sent4: if the waterproof does measure lipase that it is shockable and it remonstrates coloration does not hold. sent5: if the waterproof is unprotective that it is noncombustible thing that is a Guyanese is not right. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a megaloblast then the fact that it is alkalotic thing that measures clergyman does not hold. sent7: the waterproof does remonstrate coloration and it is a kind of a selectivity if it is not noninvasive. sent8: the fact that the waterproof is unprotective and it measures lipase is not right if it does not measure anthem. sent9: there is something such that if it does not syllogize Pelagianism then it does syllogize handedness and is addictive. sent10: the cotton measures descender and it does measure lipase if the fact that it is not a selector hold. sent11: if the harpy is a harmony then that it measures anthem and it remonstrates coloration does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if it does not measure anthem it is a kind of unprotective thing that does measure lipase. sent13: if the radiomicrometer is argentous the fact that it does measure lipase and it is sadomasochistic does not hold. sent14: if the waterproof does measure anthem then the fact that it is unprotective and it does measure lipase does not hold. sent15: if the family is trabecular then that it does waterproof and it is a thumbhole is incorrect. sent16: there is something such that if it is non-Hebraic then the fact that it is a kind of a glyceride and it remonstrates coloration does not hold. sent17: that the scalp measures anthem and it is an egress is false if it is respectful. sent18: there exists something such that if it does not measure myogram then it is alkalotic thing that is a coalfield. sent19: if the waterproof does theme harpy that it is unprotective and is a Nazarene is wrong.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not measure anthem then the fact that it is unprotective and measures lipase is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the waterproof is full the fact that it does syllogize deacon and is unprotective is wrong. sent2: if the sorceress is not Shuha then the fact that that it is a local and does measure lipase hold is false. sent3: the waterproof is unprotective and it does measure lipase if that it does not measure anthem is correct. sent4: if the waterproof does measure lipase that it is shockable and it remonstrates coloration does not hold. sent5: if the waterproof is unprotective that it is noncombustible thing that is a Guyanese is not right. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a megaloblast then the fact that it is alkalotic thing that measures clergyman does not hold. sent7: the waterproof does remonstrate coloration and it is a kind of a selectivity if it is not noninvasive. sent8: the fact that the waterproof is unprotective and it measures lipase is not right if it does not measure anthem. sent9: there is something such that if it does not syllogize Pelagianism then it does syllogize handedness and is addictive. sent10: the cotton measures descender and it does measure lipase if the fact that it is not a selector hold. sent11: if the harpy is a harmony then that it measures anthem and it remonstrates coloration does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if it does not measure anthem it is a kind of unprotective thing that does measure lipase. sent13: if the radiomicrometer is argentous the fact that it does measure lipase and it is sadomasochistic does not hold. sent14: if the waterproof does measure anthem then the fact that it is unprotective and it does measure lipase does not hold. sent15: if the family is trabecular then that it does waterproof and it is a thumbhole is incorrect. sent16: there is something such that if it is non-Hebraic then the fact that it is a kind of a glyceride and it remonstrates coloration does not hold. sent17: that the scalp measures anthem and it is an egress is false if it is respectful. sent18: there exists something such that if it does not measure myogram then it is alkalotic thing that is a coalfield. sent19: if the waterproof does theme harpy that it is unprotective and is a Nazarene is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__