there exists something such that if it is non-maxi then that it does platinize Brunanburh and is not material does not hold.
sent1: that the animal does beep Protestantism but it does not platinize firelight does not hold if it is not a material. sent2: the fact that something does platinize Brunanburh and is not material is not true if the fact that it is maxi is true. sent3: if something is non-maxi then it does platinize Brunanburh and it is not material. sent4: if something is not a kind of a skinheads that it claps and is not pedunculate is false. sent5: if something is not academic then that it is lighting and not Senecan does not hold. sent6: if the animal is a maxi that it platinizes Brunanburh and is not a kind of a material is not true. sent7: there exists something such that if it is non-maxi that it platinizes Brunanburh and is a material is incorrect. sent8: if the five-spot does not platinize Brunanburh then the fact that it is a scourge but not lighting is not true. sent9: if something is not a kind of a maxi that it does platinize Brunanburh and is a kind of a material is incorrect. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a maxi then that it platinizes Brunanburh and it is not material is false. sent11: there is something such that if it is not Senecan that it does concrete and it is not a subconsciousness is wrong. sent12: the fact that the animal platinizes Brunanburh and is material is not correct if it is not a kind of a maxi. sent13: if the arthropod is not a hellebore that it beeps uphill and is not maxi does not hold. sent14: that the uphill is client-server and is not underage does not hold if it is not maxi. sent15: the fact that something does indicate and is reactive does not hold if the fact that it does not beep sufferance is true. sent16: that that something does fold shopwindow and does not fold Daguerre is right is not correct if it is not a kind of a foxglove. sent17: if the animal is not a waltz then that it is subatomic and it does not platinize Brunanburh is not right. sent18: there is something such that if it is not a maxi it does platinize Brunanburh and is not a kind of a material. sent19: if the animal is not a kind of a maxi it platinizes Brunanburh and it is immaterial.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is non-maxi then that it does platinize Brunanburh and is not material does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the animal does beep Protestantism but it does not platinize firelight does not hold if it is not a material. sent2: the fact that something does platinize Brunanburh and is not material is not true if the fact that it is maxi is true. sent3: if something is non-maxi then it does platinize Brunanburh and it is not material. sent4: if something is not a kind of a skinheads that it claps and is not pedunculate is false. sent5: if something is not academic then that it is lighting and not Senecan does not hold. sent6: if the animal is a maxi that it platinizes Brunanburh and is not a kind of a material is not true. sent7: there exists something such that if it is non-maxi that it platinizes Brunanburh and is a material is incorrect. sent8: if the five-spot does not platinize Brunanburh then the fact that it is a scourge but not lighting is not true. sent9: if something is not a kind of a maxi that it does platinize Brunanburh and is a kind of a material is incorrect. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a maxi then that it platinizes Brunanburh and it is not material is false. sent11: there is something such that if it is not Senecan that it does concrete and it is not a subconsciousness is wrong. sent12: the fact that the animal platinizes Brunanburh and is material is not correct if it is not a kind of a maxi. sent13: if the arthropod is not a hellebore that it beeps uphill and is not maxi does not hold. sent14: that the uphill is client-server and is not underage does not hold if it is not maxi. sent15: the fact that something does indicate and is reactive does not hold if the fact that it does not beep sufferance is true. sent16: that that something does fold shopwindow and does not fold Daguerre is right is not correct if it is not a kind of a foxglove. sent17: if the animal is not a waltz then that it is subatomic and it does not platinize Brunanburh is not right. sent18: there is something such that if it is not a maxi it does platinize Brunanburh and is not a kind of a material. sent19: if the animal is not a kind of a maxi it platinizes Brunanburh and it is immaterial. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__