that the narcoterrorism occurs is right.
sent1: if the appointment occurs the walking organist happens. sent2: that the archesporialness occurs prevents that the appointment does not occur. sent3: the archesporialness occurs and the walking sprue happens. sent4: the walking sprue happens. sent5: that that the Vedicness happens and the narcoterrorism does not occur is correct prevents that the appointment occurs. sent6: both the karma and the archesporialness happens if the fact that the walking sprue does not occur is true. sent7: if the walking organist happens the narcoterrorism occurs.
sent3 -> int1: that the archesporialness occurs hold.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the appointment occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the walking organist happens.; sent7 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the karma occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the narcoterrorism occurs is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the appointment occurs the walking organist happens. sent2: that the archesporialness occurs prevents that the appointment does not occur. sent3: the archesporialness occurs and the walking sprue happens. sent4: the walking sprue happens. sent5: that that the Vedicness happens and the narcoterrorism does not occur is correct prevents that the appointment occurs. sent6: both the karma and the archesporialness happens if the fact that the walking sprue does not occur is true. sent7: if the walking organist happens the narcoterrorism occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that the archesporialness occurs hold.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the appointment occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the walking organist happens.; sent7 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__