the arborealness does not occur and the re-establishment happens.
sent1: the fact that the fermenting prospector does not occur is not wrong. sent2: that the impoundment does not occur is right if the Mills occurs. sent3: if the sawm does not occur the re-establishment happens. sent4: if the allowancing and the non-mutableness occurs that the fermenting prospector happens is correct. sent5: the allowance does not occur if the fact that the mechanization does not occur and the uncoiling Orontium does not occur is not true. sent6: the fact that the welcome does not occur is true if the uncoiling Ultrasuede occurs. sent7: that the psychogeneticness does not occur is prevented by the immutableness. sent8: the fact that not the seduction but the airdrop occurs does not hold. sent9: the diachronicness does not occur if the fact that both the surfacing and the sarcosomalness occurs is false. sent10: that the diachronicness does not occur causes that both the psychogeneticness and the sawm occurs. sent11: the haranguing isometric happens. sent12: if the welcomeness does not occur then that that both the surfaceness and the sarcosomalness happens hold is not true. sent13: the arousal does not occur and the gait occurs if the fermenting waist does not occur. sent14: that both the sawm and the psychogeneticness happens is brought about by that the re-establishment does not occur. sent15: the fact that the uploading rustic does not occur and the hurry does not occur is not right. sent16: that the allowance does not occur but the mutableness occurs is incorrect if that the diachronicness happens is not incorrect. sent17: if the fermenting prospector occurs then the fact that not the arborealness but the re-establishment happens is wrong. sent18: not the sawm but the psychogeneticness happens if the mutableness does not occur. sent19: that the sawm does not occur triggers that not the arborealness but the re-establishment occurs. sent20: the quadrupling happens. sent21: the re-formation happens. sent22: the beam happens. sent23: the fermenting prospector triggers that not the confession but the breakthrough happens. sent24: the re-establishment happens. sent25: if that the fermenting prospector does not occur is correct the fact that the fact that the mechanization does not occur and the uncoiling Orontium does not occur is right is wrong. sent26: that not the mechanization but the uncoiling Orontium occurs does not hold if the fact that the fermenting prospector does not occur is not false.
sent25 & sent1 -> int1: that the mechanization does not occur and the uncoiling Orontium does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the allowancing does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mutableness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the allowance does not occur and the mutableness happens.;
the confession does not occur and the breakthrough occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the arborealness does not occur and the re-establishment happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fermenting prospector does not occur is not wrong. sent2: that the impoundment does not occur is right if the Mills occurs. sent3: if the sawm does not occur the re-establishment happens. sent4: if the allowancing and the non-mutableness occurs that the fermenting prospector happens is correct. sent5: the allowance does not occur if the fact that the mechanization does not occur and the uncoiling Orontium does not occur is not true. sent6: the fact that the welcome does not occur is true if the uncoiling Ultrasuede occurs. sent7: that the psychogeneticness does not occur is prevented by the immutableness. sent8: the fact that not the seduction but the airdrop occurs does not hold. sent9: the diachronicness does not occur if the fact that both the surfacing and the sarcosomalness occurs is false. sent10: that the diachronicness does not occur causes that both the psychogeneticness and the sawm occurs. sent11: the haranguing isometric happens. sent12: if the welcomeness does not occur then that that both the surfaceness and the sarcosomalness happens hold is not true. sent13: the arousal does not occur and the gait occurs if the fermenting waist does not occur. sent14: that both the sawm and the psychogeneticness happens is brought about by that the re-establishment does not occur. sent15: the fact that the uploading rustic does not occur and the hurry does not occur is not right. sent16: that the allowance does not occur but the mutableness occurs is incorrect if that the diachronicness happens is not incorrect. sent17: if the fermenting prospector occurs then the fact that not the arborealness but the re-establishment happens is wrong. sent18: not the sawm but the psychogeneticness happens if the mutableness does not occur. sent19: that the sawm does not occur triggers that not the arborealness but the re-establishment occurs. sent20: the quadrupling happens. sent21: the re-formation happens. sent22: the beam happens. sent23: the fermenting prospector triggers that not the confession but the breakthrough happens. sent24: the re-establishment happens. sent25: if that the fermenting prospector does not occur is correct the fact that the fact that the mechanization does not occur and the uncoiling Orontium does not occur is right is wrong. sent26: that not the mechanization but the uncoiling Orontium occurs does not hold if the fact that the fermenting prospector does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 & sent1 -> int1: that the mechanization does not occur and the uncoiling Orontium does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the allowancing does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mutableness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the allowance does not occur and the mutableness happens.; __UNKNOWN__