the teasel is not a klystron.
sent1: something is a break and is Handelian. sent2: the sedative-hypnotic does shove. sent3: if the ramontchi does traffic cello then it is immeasurable. sent4: the fact that the hydromel does not traffic cello is wrong. sent5: the sedative-hypnotic is a shove and is a bundle if there is something such that it is a mobile. sent6: the ramontchi is not a wrench and does vitriol thermometer. sent7: if that something is not a mobile but it does traffic cello is incorrect it is not a klystron. sent8: if the Tamil does traffic cello then it is a kind of a mobile. sent9: that the ramontchi is a shove is true if the sedative-hypnotic is immeasurable. sent10: if something vitriols thermometer and it is immeasurable the fact that the teasel is a klystron is right. sent11: there are immeasurable things. sent12: the sedative-hypnotic is a shove if there exists something such that it is a mobile. sent13: the ramontchi is not a wrench. sent14: the granulocyte redirects specificity. sent15: there exists something such that it does vitriol thermometer. sent16: the sedative-hypnotic is a mobile if it is a bundle. sent17: the sedative-hypnotic does wrench and it is immeasurable if there is something such that it does bundle. sent18: the Tamil traffics cello. sent19: the Tamil is immeasurable. sent20: the teasel does traffic cello. sent21: the teasel does shove. sent22: the stickler does not vitriol downgrade and does vitriol thermometer. sent23: the ramontchi is a bundle if something is both a mobile and immeasurable. sent24: the ramontchi is a bundle. sent25: the ramontchi is immeasurable if the sedative-hypnotic is a bundle. sent26: The cello traffics Tamil.
sent8 & sent18 -> int1: the Tamil is mobile.; int1 -> int2: something is mobile.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the sedative-hypnotic is a kind of a shove and is a bundle.; int3 -> int4: that the sedative-hypnotic is a bundle is correct.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the ramontchi is immeasurable.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that the ramontchi vitriols thermometer is true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the ramontchi does vitriol thermometer and it is immeasurable.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it does vitriol thermometer and it is immeasurable.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the teasel is not a klystron.
sent7 -> int9: the teasel is not a kind of a klystron if the fact that it is immobile thing that traffics cello does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the teasel is not a klystron. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a break and is Handelian. sent2: the sedative-hypnotic does shove. sent3: if the ramontchi does traffic cello then it is immeasurable. sent4: the fact that the hydromel does not traffic cello is wrong. sent5: the sedative-hypnotic is a shove and is a bundle if there is something such that it is a mobile. sent6: the ramontchi is not a wrench and does vitriol thermometer. sent7: if that something is not a mobile but it does traffic cello is incorrect it is not a klystron. sent8: if the Tamil does traffic cello then it is a kind of a mobile. sent9: that the ramontchi is a shove is true if the sedative-hypnotic is immeasurable. sent10: if something vitriols thermometer and it is immeasurable the fact that the teasel is a klystron is right. sent11: there are immeasurable things. sent12: the sedative-hypnotic is a shove if there exists something such that it is a mobile. sent13: the ramontchi is not a wrench. sent14: the granulocyte redirects specificity. sent15: there exists something such that it does vitriol thermometer. sent16: the sedative-hypnotic is a mobile if it is a bundle. sent17: the sedative-hypnotic does wrench and it is immeasurable if there is something such that it does bundle. sent18: the Tamil traffics cello. sent19: the Tamil is immeasurable. sent20: the teasel does traffic cello. sent21: the teasel does shove. sent22: the stickler does not vitriol downgrade and does vitriol thermometer. sent23: the ramontchi is a bundle if something is both a mobile and immeasurable. sent24: the ramontchi is a bundle. sent25: the ramontchi is immeasurable if the sedative-hypnotic is a bundle. sent26: The cello traffics Tamil. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent18 -> int1: the Tamil is mobile.; int1 -> int2: something is mobile.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the sedative-hypnotic is a kind of a shove and is a bundle.; int3 -> int4: that the sedative-hypnotic is a bundle is correct.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the ramontchi is immeasurable.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that the ramontchi vitriols thermometer is true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the ramontchi does vitriol thermometer and it is immeasurable.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it does vitriol thermometer and it is immeasurable.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__