either the contradistinguishing Xyphophorus or the ecdemicness or both occurs.
sent1: the unalertness does not occur if not the seismologicalness but the inspiratoriness happens. sent2: if the canceling PFLP happens then the nodding heuristic occurs. sent3: the environmentalism happens. sent4: the chronologicalness happens if the foreclosing does not occur. sent5: that both the non-seismologicalness and the non-inspiratoryness happens brings about that the unalertness does not occur. sent6: that the unwrapping happens is triggered by that the resistiveness occurs. sent7: that not the upper-classness but the crooking amelioration occurs prevents that the malignantness occurs. sent8: if the literalness does not occur the canceling Streep and the send-off happens. sent9: that the attributiveness happens is not incorrect. sent10: the unalertness does not occur if the fact that the seismologicalness but not the inspiratoriness happens is not false. sent11: that the badminton does not occur yields that the canter happens. sent12: if the foreclosing occurs then the unalertness happens. sent13: the nodding heuristic brings about the contradistinguishing Xyphophorus. sent14: the nodding bourgeoisie occurs. sent15: the chronologicalness occurs. sent16: both the non-seismologicalness and the non-inspiratoriness happens. sent17: the chronologicalness happens and the canceling PFLP happens if that the foreclosing does not occur is not false. sent18: if the canceling Assyriology but not the canceling agaric happens then the hydrolyzableness does not occur. sent19: that the disreputableness happens but the cube does not occur prevents the canceling cadetship.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the foreclosing occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the unalertness occurs.; sent5 & sent16 -> int2: the unalertness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the foreclosing does not occur.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the chronologicalness happens and the canceling PFLP happens.; int5 -> int6: the canceling PFLP occurs.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the nodding heuristic occurs.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the contradistinguishing Xyphophorus occurs.; int8 -> hypothesis;
that the contradistinguishing Xyphophorus and/or the ecdemicness happens is wrong.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = either the contradistinguishing Xyphophorus or the ecdemicness or both occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the unalertness does not occur if not the seismologicalness but the inspiratoriness happens. sent2: if the canceling PFLP happens then the nodding heuristic occurs. sent3: the environmentalism happens. sent4: the chronologicalness happens if the foreclosing does not occur. sent5: that both the non-seismologicalness and the non-inspiratoryness happens brings about that the unalertness does not occur. sent6: that the unwrapping happens is triggered by that the resistiveness occurs. sent7: that not the upper-classness but the crooking amelioration occurs prevents that the malignantness occurs. sent8: if the literalness does not occur the canceling Streep and the send-off happens. sent9: that the attributiveness happens is not incorrect. sent10: the unalertness does not occur if the fact that the seismologicalness but not the inspiratoriness happens is not false. sent11: that the badminton does not occur yields that the canter happens. sent12: if the foreclosing occurs then the unalertness happens. sent13: the nodding heuristic brings about the contradistinguishing Xyphophorus. sent14: the nodding bourgeoisie occurs. sent15: the chronologicalness occurs. sent16: both the non-seismologicalness and the non-inspiratoriness happens. sent17: the chronologicalness happens and the canceling PFLP happens if that the foreclosing does not occur is not false. sent18: if the canceling Assyriology but not the canceling agaric happens then the hydrolyzableness does not occur. sent19: that the disreputableness happens but the cube does not occur prevents the canceling cadetship. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the foreclosing occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the unalertness occurs.; sent5 & sent16 -> int2: the unalertness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the foreclosing does not occur.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the chronologicalness happens and the canceling PFLP happens.; int5 -> int6: the canceling PFLP occurs.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the nodding heuristic occurs.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the contradistinguishing Xyphophorus occurs.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__