the socialisticness occurs.
sent1: if the retaliation does not occur that the penalty does not occur and the socialisticness does not occur is not correct. sent2: that the unmadeness and the menarche happens leads to that the penalty does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the cloying Galician does not occur but the cloying taste occurs is not true is not false if the escalading does not occur. sent4: if the RFD occurs then that the retaliation happens and the cloying taste does not occur is not true. sent5: both the underquoting Scyliorhinidae and the menarche happens. sent6: if the fact that the underquoting Scyliorhinidae and the menarche occurs is false then the socialisticness does not occur. sent7: the underquoting potentiation does not occur if the fact that that the underquoting potentiation but not the settling occurs is true is false. sent8: the RFD happens. sent9: that the retaliation does not occur but the RFD happens does not hold if the cloying taste does not occur. sent10: if that the retaliation occurs and the cloying taste does not occur does not hold the retaliation does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the retaliation does not occur but the RFD happens is not right then the retaliation occurs. sent12: the cloying taste does not occur if that the cloying Galician does not occur and the cloying taste occurs does not hold.
sent5 -> int1: the menarche occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the socialisticness happens is not right.; sent4 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the retaliation but not the cloying taste occurs is not correct.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the retaliation does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the penalty does not occur and the socialisticness does not occur is false.;
the socialisticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the socialisticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the retaliation does not occur that the penalty does not occur and the socialisticness does not occur is not correct. sent2: that the unmadeness and the menarche happens leads to that the penalty does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the cloying Galician does not occur but the cloying taste occurs is not true is not false if the escalading does not occur. sent4: if the RFD occurs then that the retaliation happens and the cloying taste does not occur is not true. sent5: both the underquoting Scyliorhinidae and the menarche happens. sent6: if the fact that the underquoting Scyliorhinidae and the menarche occurs is false then the socialisticness does not occur. sent7: the underquoting potentiation does not occur if the fact that that the underquoting potentiation but not the settling occurs is true is false. sent8: the RFD happens. sent9: that the retaliation does not occur but the RFD happens does not hold if the cloying taste does not occur. sent10: if that the retaliation occurs and the cloying taste does not occur does not hold the retaliation does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the retaliation does not occur but the RFD happens is not right then the retaliation occurs. sent12: the cloying taste does not occur if that the cloying Galician does not occur and the cloying taste occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the menarche occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the socialisticness happens is not right.; sent4 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the retaliation but not the cloying taste occurs is not correct.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the retaliation does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the penalty does not occur and the socialisticness does not occur is false.; __UNKNOWN__