the lorgnette is not Semitic and it does not embrown accentuation.
sent1: something is not a kind of a Jay and stows ROI. sent2: the Dalmatian is not triumphal but it is artesian if the poseuse is not artesian. sent3: if something that is not a canthus is a kind of a minivan the poseuse is not artesian. sent4: the lorgnette is not Semitic and it does not embrown accentuation if the fact that it is not artesian is correct. sent5: the fact that something is not a Semitic and does not embrown accentuation is wrong if it does embrown lodge. sent6: something is subjective and a Macropodidae. sent7: if the fact that the larynx is not a Macropodidae and it is not subjective is incorrect then the lorgnette does embrown lodge. sent8: the gimbal is both not a canthus and a minivan. sent9: if the Dalmatian is artesian then that that the larynx is not a Macropodidae and it is not subjective is not right is true.
sent8 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a canthus but a minivan.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the poseuse is not artesian.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Dalmatian is not triumphal and is artesian.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the Dalmatian is artesian is correct.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the larynx is not a Macropodidae and it is non-subjective is incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the lorgnette does embrown lodge.; sent5 -> int7: that the lorgnette is a kind of non-Semitic thing that does not embrown accentuation is not right if it embrowns lodge.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the lorgnette is a kind of non-Semitic thing that does not embrown accentuation.
$hypothesis$ = the lorgnette is not Semitic and it does not embrown accentuation. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a Jay and stows ROI. sent2: the Dalmatian is not triumphal but it is artesian if the poseuse is not artesian. sent3: if something that is not a canthus is a kind of a minivan the poseuse is not artesian. sent4: the lorgnette is not Semitic and it does not embrown accentuation if the fact that it is not artesian is correct. sent5: the fact that something is not a Semitic and does not embrown accentuation is wrong if it does embrown lodge. sent6: something is subjective and a Macropodidae. sent7: if the fact that the larynx is not a Macropodidae and it is not subjective is incorrect then the lorgnette does embrown lodge. sent8: the gimbal is both not a canthus and a minivan. sent9: if the Dalmatian is artesian then that that the larynx is not a Macropodidae and it is not subjective is not right is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a canthus but a minivan.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the poseuse is not artesian.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Dalmatian is not triumphal and is artesian.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the Dalmatian is artesian is correct.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the larynx is not a Macropodidae and it is non-subjective is incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the lorgnette does embrown lodge.; sent5 -> int7: that the lorgnette is a kind of non-Semitic thing that does not embrown accentuation is not right if it embrowns lodge.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__