the reappearance does not occur.
sent1: that the prognathousness does not occur brings about that the non-Pharaonicness and the non-pro-choiceness occurs. sent2: the reappearance does not occur if that not the factorizing cloning but the reappearance happens does not hold. sent3: the circling homicide does not occur if the fact that the refusal does not occur and the factorizing cloning does not occur is false. sent4: that the abnegation does not occur is caused by the non-wieldiness. sent5: the fact that the abnegation occurs but the Palestinian does not occur is incorrect if the unsarcasticness does not occur. sent6: the reappearance happens if that the factorizing cloning does not occur hold. sent7: the factorizing propertied does not occur. sent8: that the barratry does not occur is brought about by that the factorizing propertied does not occur. sent9: the refusal does not occur. sent10: if both the circling marten and the factorizing cloning happens then the fact that the unsarcasticness does not occur is right. sent11: the wieldiness does not occur if the barratry does not occur. sent12: if the barratry happens the fact that the wieldiness does not occur and the reappearance does not occur is false. sent13: if the wieldiness does not occur then the abnegation does not occur and the Palestinianness does not occur. sent14: that not the factorizing cloning but the reappearance occurs is not correct if the refusal happens. sent15: the fact that the myringectomy does not occur hold. sent16: that the abnegation but not the Palestinianness occurs is not correct. sent17: if the unsarcasticness does not occur then the fact that the abnegation does not occur and the Palestinian does not occur is wrong. sent18: that the refusal does not occur results in that the myringectomy does not occur. sent19: the abnegation does not occur. sent20: that the myringectomy does not occur and the circling marten happens is triggered by that the refusal does not occur.
sent20 & sent9 -> int1: not the myringectomy but the circling marten happens.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the circling marten occurs hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the factorizing cloning happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the circling marten and the factorizing cloning happens.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the unsarcasticness does not occur hold.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the abnegation does not occur and the Palestinian does not occur is incorrect.; sent8 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the barratry does not occur hold.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the wieldiness does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the abnegation does not occur and the Palestinian does not occur.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the factorizing cloning does not occur.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the reappearance does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the reappearance does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the prognathousness does not occur brings about that the non-Pharaonicness and the non-pro-choiceness occurs. sent2: the reappearance does not occur if that not the factorizing cloning but the reappearance happens does not hold. sent3: the circling homicide does not occur if the fact that the refusal does not occur and the factorizing cloning does not occur is false. sent4: that the abnegation does not occur is caused by the non-wieldiness. sent5: the fact that the abnegation occurs but the Palestinian does not occur is incorrect if the unsarcasticness does not occur. sent6: the reappearance happens if that the factorizing cloning does not occur hold. sent7: the factorizing propertied does not occur. sent8: that the barratry does not occur is brought about by that the factorizing propertied does not occur. sent9: the refusal does not occur. sent10: if both the circling marten and the factorizing cloning happens then the fact that the unsarcasticness does not occur is right. sent11: the wieldiness does not occur if the barratry does not occur. sent12: if the barratry happens the fact that the wieldiness does not occur and the reappearance does not occur is false. sent13: if the wieldiness does not occur then the abnegation does not occur and the Palestinianness does not occur. sent14: that not the factorizing cloning but the reappearance occurs is not correct if the refusal happens. sent15: the fact that the myringectomy does not occur hold. sent16: that the abnegation but not the Palestinianness occurs is not correct. sent17: if the unsarcasticness does not occur then the fact that the abnegation does not occur and the Palestinian does not occur is wrong. sent18: that the refusal does not occur results in that the myringectomy does not occur. sent19: the abnegation does not occur. sent20: that the myringectomy does not occur and the circling marten happens is triggered by that the refusal does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent9 -> int1: not the myringectomy but the circling marten happens.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the circling marten occurs hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the factorizing cloning happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the circling marten and the factorizing cloning happens.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the unsarcasticness does not occur hold.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the abnegation does not occur and the Palestinian does not occur is incorrect.; sent8 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the barratry does not occur hold.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the wieldiness does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the abnegation does not occur and the Palestinian does not occur.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the factorizing cloning does not occur.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__