the fact that something is not a Sphecidae and does not clap cuisine does not hold.
sent1: the maigre is not a Semite. sent2: if the sweatband is accipitrine then that the glucosamine is not Draconian but accipitrine is not true. sent3: the fact that that the glucosamine is not accipitrine and does not clap vicariate is not wrong is wrong if the maigre does clap vicariate. sent4: something is not sinkable. sent5: there exists something such that it does not clap cuisine and it does not befuddle. sent6: if the fact that the glucosamine is a kind of a Merman is not wrong it is not a Sphecidae. sent7: if that the sweatband is not a Sphecidae and does not clap cuisine is false it does not befuddle. sent8: the sweatband is not Semite. sent9: the glucosamine is non-accipitrine thing that does not clap vicariate if it is not a Semite. sent10: the maigre is not accipitrine. sent11: something is not a Caravaggio and it does not corrode bimbo if it does befuddle. sent12: the glucosamine is not a Semite. sent13: if that the sweatband is both Draconian and not a Caravaggio is not correct the maigre claps vicariate. sent14: if the sweatband does clap vicariate then the dromedary is non-Draconian thing that befuddles. sent15: there exists something such that it does not clap vicariate and it is Draconian. sent16: the fact that the sweatband is Draconian and is not a kind of a Caravaggio is not true if it does not befuddle.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the sweatband is not a Sphecidae and does not clap cuisine is not true is not incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the sweatband does not befuddle.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the sweatband is Draconian and is not a kind of a Caravaggio is incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the maigre does clap vicariate.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the glucosamine is a kind of non-accipitrine thing that does not clap vicariate is incorrect.; sent9 & sent12 -> int5: the glucosamine is not accipitrine and it does not clap vicariate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the sweatband is not a Sphecidae and it does not clap cuisine is true.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the dromedary is not a kind of a Caravaggio and it does not corrode bimbo.
sent11 -> int8: if the dromedary befuddles then it is not a Caravaggio and it does not corrode bimbo.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is not a Sphecidae and does not clap cuisine does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the maigre is not a Semite. sent2: if the sweatband is accipitrine then that the glucosamine is not Draconian but accipitrine is not true. sent3: the fact that that the glucosamine is not accipitrine and does not clap vicariate is not wrong is wrong if the maigre does clap vicariate. sent4: something is not sinkable. sent5: there exists something such that it does not clap cuisine and it does not befuddle. sent6: if the fact that the glucosamine is a kind of a Merman is not wrong it is not a Sphecidae. sent7: if that the sweatband is not a Sphecidae and does not clap cuisine is false it does not befuddle. sent8: the sweatband is not Semite. sent9: the glucosamine is non-accipitrine thing that does not clap vicariate if it is not a Semite. sent10: the maigre is not accipitrine. sent11: something is not a Caravaggio and it does not corrode bimbo if it does befuddle. sent12: the glucosamine is not a Semite. sent13: if that the sweatband is both Draconian and not a Caravaggio is not correct the maigre claps vicariate. sent14: if the sweatband does clap vicariate then the dromedary is non-Draconian thing that befuddles. sent15: there exists something such that it does not clap vicariate and it is Draconian. sent16: the fact that the sweatband is Draconian and is not a kind of a Caravaggio is not true if it does not befuddle. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the sweatband is not a Sphecidae and does not clap cuisine is not true is not incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the sweatband does not befuddle.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the sweatband is Draconian and is not a kind of a Caravaggio is incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the maigre does clap vicariate.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the glucosamine is a kind of non-accipitrine thing that does not clap vicariate is incorrect.; sent9 & sent12 -> int5: the glucosamine is not accipitrine and it does not clap vicariate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the sweatband is not a Sphecidae and it does not clap cuisine is true.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__