the slapper is not prejudicial.
sent1: if the Bush is unreceptive then the slapper is not prejudicial. sent2: the glycoprotein is not a indefiniteness. sent3: that the Bush is carbonyl and it does talc biggin is incorrect if it is assertive. sent4: if the glycoprotein is not a indefiniteness that the Bush is both not cecal and not receptive is not correct. sent5: that the Bush is a kind of non-cecal thing that is unreceptive does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the Bush is not cecal and it is not unreceptive is wrong then the slapper is not prejudicial. sent7: the glycoprotein is a liquidation and is prejudicial if the Bush does not talc biggin. sent8: that the glycoprotein is not unreceptive and is not a indefiniteness is not true. sent9: if the Bush is not cecal the fact that the glycoprotein is a kind of non-prejudicial thing that is not a kind of a indefiniteness does not hold. sent10: that the slapper is both not cecal and not unreceptive is not true if the Bush is non-prejudicial.
that the slapper is prejudicial is true.
$hypothesis$ = the slapper is not prejudicial. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Bush is unreceptive then the slapper is not prejudicial. sent2: the glycoprotein is not a indefiniteness. sent3: that the Bush is carbonyl and it does talc biggin is incorrect if it is assertive. sent4: if the glycoprotein is not a indefiniteness that the Bush is both not cecal and not receptive is not correct. sent5: that the Bush is a kind of non-cecal thing that is unreceptive does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the Bush is not cecal and it is not unreceptive is wrong then the slapper is not prejudicial. sent7: the glycoprotein is a liquidation and is prejudicial if the Bush does not talc biggin. sent8: that the glycoprotein is not unreceptive and is not a indefiniteness is not true. sent9: if the Bush is not cecal the fact that the glycoprotein is a kind of non-prejudicial thing that is not a kind of a indefiniteness does not hold. sent10: that the slapper is both not cecal and not unreceptive is not true if the Bush is non-prejudicial. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__