there is something such that if that it does not linger and it is not a material does not hold it is a policy.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it is corrigible and it is not juvenile is incorrect it does home. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does linger and is not a material does not hold then it is a policy. sent3: if the fact that the bastion is not a materiality and is not skinless does not hold it is a material. sent4: there is something such that if it lingers then it is a kind of a policy. sent5: there is something such that if that it is not a dab and it is not psychomotor is not true it is neocortical. sent6: the gaur is a policy if that it does not linger and is material is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the fact that the desertification is not a Methodists and it does not weed lustrum hold does not hold that it dabs is right. sent8: if the fact that the gaur is not a kind of a twentieth and it does not better surrogate does not hold it does linger. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not linger and is not a material then it is a kind of a policy. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does not linger and it is a kind of a material does not hold it is a policy. sent11: there is something such that if that it is both not an essayist and not a Equisetum is incorrect then it is anacoluthic. sent12: that the gaur is a kind of a policy hold if the fact that it does not linger and it is immaterial is incorrect. sent13: there is something such that if it is a material then it is a policy. sent14: the gaur is a policy if it lingers. sent15: there is something such that if that it is both not a twerp and not a birder is wrong it does better bastion. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a Merovingian and is not sidereal is wrong it does grit. sent17: if the gaur does not linger and it is not material it is a kind of a policy.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does not linger and it is not a material does not hold it is a policy. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is corrigible and it is not juvenile is incorrect it does home. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does linger and is not a material does not hold then it is a policy. sent3: if the fact that the bastion is not a materiality and is not skinless does not hold it is a material. sent4: there is something such that if it lingers then it is a kind of a policy. sent5: there is something such that if that it is not a dab and it is not psychomotor is not true it is neocortical. sent6: the gaur is a policy if that it does not linger and is material is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the fact that the desertification is not a Methodists and it does not weed lustrum hold does not hold that it dabs is right. sent8: if the fact that the gaur is not a kind of a twentieth and it does not better surrogate does not hold it does linger. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not linger and is not a material then it is a kind of a policy. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does not linger and it is a kind of a material does not hold it is a policy. sent11: there is something such that if that it is both not an essayist and not a Equisetum is incorrect then it is anacoluthic. sent12: that the gaur is a kind of a policy hold if the fact that it does not linger and it is immaterial is incorrect. sent13: there is something such that if it is a material then it is a policy. sent14: the gaur is a policy if it lingers. sent15: there is something such that if that it is both not a twerp and not a birder is wrong it does better bastion. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a Merovingian and is not sidereal is wrong it does grit. sent17: if the gaur does not linger and it is not material it is a kind of a policy. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__