the fact that the expansionistness does not occur but the communicating happens is incorrect.
sent1: the communicating occurs if the barreling does not occur. sent2: that the disunifying anteriority occurs leads to that the expansionistness does not occur. sent3: that the barrel does not occur is triggered by the destructibleness. sent4: the browsing munj does not occur. sent5: the admissibleness does not occur. sent6: the communicating does not occur and the indestructibleness happens if the corseting Cryptocercidae does not occur. sent7: if that the indestructibleness and the corseting Cryptocercidae occurs is false then the barrel does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the respiratoriness does not occur is correct that the indestructibleness happens and the corseting Cryptocercidae occurs is not right. sent9: the respiratoriness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the respiratoriness does not occur and the apposition does not occur does not hold if the infiltrating occurs. sent11: the tubelessness happens. sent12: the disunifying ptyalin does not occur if that the fact that the browsing munj happens and the disunifying anteriority does not occur does not hold is correct. sent13: that the disunifying exodus does not occur is true. sent14: the browsing munj occurs if the disunifying anteriority does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the disunifying anteriority does not occur is not wrong.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the browsing munj occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the disunifying anteriority happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the expansionistness does not occur.; sent8 & sent9 -> int5: that the fact that the indestructibleness and the corseting Cryptocercidae occurs is correct is not correct.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the barreling does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the communicating occurs.; int4 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the non-expansionistness and the communicating occurs is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the expansionistness does not occur but the communicating happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the communicating occurs if the barreling does not occur. sent2: that the disunifying anteriority occurs leads to that the expansionistness does not occur. sent3: that the barrel does not occur is triggered by the destructibleness. sent4: the browsing munj does not occur. sent5: the admissibleness does not occur. sent6: the communicating does not occur and the indestructibleness happens if the corseting Cryptocercidae does not occur. sent7: if that the indestructibleness and the corseting Cryptocercidae occurs is false then the barrel does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the respiratoriness does not occur is correct that the indestructibleness happens and the corseting Cryptocercidae occurs is not right. sent9: the respiratoriness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the respiratoriness does not occur and the apposition does not occur does not hold if the infiltrating occurs. sent11: the tubelessness happens. sent12: the disunifying ptyalin does not occur if that the fact that the browsing munj happens and the disunifying anteriority does not occur does not hold is correct. sent13: that the disunifying exodus does not occur is true. sent14: the browsing munj occurs if the disunifying anteriority does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the disunifying anteriority does not occur is not wrong.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the browsing munj occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the disunifying anteriority happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the expansionistness does not occur.; sent8 & sent9 -> int5: that the fact that the indestructibleness and the corseting Cryptocercidae occurs is correct is not correct.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the barreling does not occur.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the communicating occurs.; int4 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__