the starving does not occur.
sent1: if the abasicness does not occur and the aculeateness happens the Alpineness does not occur. sent2: the non-abasicness and the non-aculeateness occurs. sent3: that the Alpineness happens is prevented by that the abasicness occurs and the aculeateness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the laicizing confessor happens hold. sent5: that the healthfulness does not occur leads to that the choreography and the laicizing confessor occurs. sent6: if the healthfulness does not occur then the fact that the laicizing confessor occurs hold. sent7: if the abasicness does not occur and the aculeateness does not occur then the Alpineness does not occur. sent8: that the saltation occurs is not wrong. sent9: if the pun does not occur both the subsonicness and the starving occurs. sent10: the subsonicness occurs. sent11: the choreography does not occur if the investment and the punning happens. sent12: that the laicizing theme does not occur causes that both the ping and the consequence happens. sent13: the investment happens if the Alpineness does not occur. sent14: the healthfulness does not occur if the vacating snuffers occurs. sent15: the subsonicness happens if the punning does not occur. sent16: both the saltation and the vacating snuffers occurs.
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the Alpineness does not occur.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the investment occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pun occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the investment happens and the pun occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the choreography does not occur.; sent16 -> int5: the vacating snuffers happens.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the healthfulness does not occur.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: both the choreography and the laicizing confessor happens.; int7 -> int8: the choreography happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the punning does not occur.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the subsonicness and the starving occurs.; int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the starving does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the abasicness does not occur and the aculeateness happens the Alpineness does not occur. sent2: the non-abasicness and the non-aculeateness occurs. sent3: that the Alpineness happens is prevented by that the abasicness occurs and the aculeateness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the laicizing confessor happens hold. sent5: that the healthfulness does not occur leads to that the choreography and the laicizing confessor occurs. sent6: if the healthfulness does not occur then the fact that the laicizing confessor occurs hold. sent7: if the abasicness does not occur and the aculeateness does not occur then the Alpineness does not occur. sent8: that the saltation occurs is not wrong. sent9: if the pun does not occur both the subsonicness and the starving occurs. sent10: the subsonicness occurs. sent11: the choreography does not occur if the investment and the punning happens. sent12: that the laicizing theme does not occur causes that both the ping and the consequence happens. sent13: the investment happens if the Alpineness does not occur. sent14: the healthfulness does not occur if the vacating snuffers occurs. sent15: the subsonicness happens if the punning does not occur. sent16: both the saltation and the vacating snuffers occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the Alpineness does not occur.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the investment occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pun occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the investment happens and the pun occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the choreography does not occur.; sent16 -> int5: the vacating snuffers happens.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the healthfulness does not occur.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: both the choreography and the laicizing confessor happens.; int7 -> int8: the choreography happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the punning does not occur.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the subsonicness and the starving occurs.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__