there exists something such that if the fact that it does not exclaim harshness is not correct then it does not extirpate and it is not competitive.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does exclaim harshness then it extirpates and is not competitive. sent2: there exists something such that if it does exclaim harshness then that it does not extirpate is correct. sent3: there is something such that if it exclaims harshness then it is not competitive. sent4: the juxtaposition does not extirpate and it is not a semifinal if it is mutational. sent5: the juxtaposition is a kind of non-competitive thing that is not a subjugator if it is a kind of a stray. sent6: there exists something such that if that it does hypnotize credence is not false then it is not acentric and it does not emaciate. sent7: if the juxtaposition does exclaim harshness then it does not extirpate and is not competitive. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a jibboom it does not exclaim Whitehead and is not czarist. sent9: the bindery is both not competitive and not faceless if it is Falstaffian. sent10: if the juxtaposition is a terabyte then it is not a jibboom and it is not important. sent11: if the omnivore does extirpate it is both not full and not faceless. sent12: there exists something such that if it is prehistoric then it does not exclaim extremity and it is not a gasometer. sent13: the Lastex is not a kind of a mitogen and it is not a Omsk if it is competitive. sent14: the juxtaposition is a kind of non-chordal thing that is not low-interest if it does exclaim harshness. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it does exclaim harshness is not incorrect it does not extirpate and it is competitive. sent16: there is something such that if it is multiple-choice then it is not a swoop and is not a Omsk. sent17: if the juxtaposition does exclaim harshness it extirpates and it is not competitive. sent18: something is both not costive and not a unexpectedness if it is full. sent19: if the workstation relocates it is not a kind of a Terebellidae and it does not trellis. sent20: the juxtaposition is not competitive if it does exclaim harshness.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does full then it is not costive and it is not a unexpectedness.
sent18 -> int1: the chopine is both not costive and not a unexpectedness if it does full.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not exclaim harshness is not correct then it does not extirpate and it is not competitive. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does exclaim harshness then it extirpates and is not competitive. sent2: there exists something such that if it does exclaim harshness then that it does not extirpate is correct. sent3: there is something such that if it exclaims harshness then it is not competitive. sent4: the juxtaposition does not extirpate and it is not a semifinal if it is mutational. sent5: the juxtaposition is a kind of non-competitive thing that is not a subjugator if it is a kind of a stray. sent6: there exists something such that if that it does hypnotize credence is not false then it is not acentric and it does not emaciate. sent7: if the juxtaposition does exclaim harshness then it does not extirpate and is not competitive. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a jibboom it does not exclaim Whitehead and is not czarist. sent9: the bindery is both not competitive and not faceless if it is Falstaffian. sent10: if the juxtaposition is a terabyte then it is not a jibboom and it is not important. sent11: if the omnivore does extirpate it is both not full and not faceless. sent12: there exists something such that if it is prehistoric then it does not exclaim extremity and it is not a gasometer. sent13: the Lastex is not a kind of a mitogen and it is not a Omsk if it is competitive. sent14: the juxtaposition is a kind of non-chordal thing that is not low-interest if it does exclaim harshness. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it does exclaim harshness is not incorrect it does not extirpate and it is competitive. sent16: there is something such that if it is multiple-choice then it is not a swoop and is not a Omsk. sent17: if the juxtaposition does exclaim harshness it extirpates and it is not competitive. sent18: something is both not costive and not a unexpectedness if it is full. sent19: if the workstation relocates it is not a kind of a Terebellidae and it does not trellis. sent20: the juxtaposition is not competitive if it does exclaim harshness. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__