that the tulle is a salami and is a graduality is not right.
sent1: that the sandblaster is non-repeatable thing that is counterrevolutionary is not right if that the ortolan does not spring-clean matchbook is true. sent2: the orphrey does green if the paca is a kind of a balderdash. sent3: either everything is not a kind of a balderdash or it does not green or both. sent4: something that is non-salamandriform does not remove dazzle and is a kind of a phyle. sent5: if the parishioner does not dance hilarity and it is not a jagged then the publican is a kind of a jagged. sent6: if something is not salamandriform the fact that it is a salami that is a kind of a graduality is not true. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it does spring-clean matchbook and it is not a coconut is not correct then the sandblaster does not spring-clean matchbook. sent8: the parishioner is a filovirus. sent9: the ortolan is not unrepeatable if it is not a graduality. sent10: if something is not repeatable then it is salamandriform. sent11: if something is not a kind of a greens it is not a kind of a coconut. sent12: something is not a kind of a coconut if the fact that it is a kind of a balderdash does not hold. sent13: a salamandriform thing is not non-counterrevolutionary. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it jags is not incorrect the paca is a kind of a balderdash and/or it is a kind of a jags. sent15: the sandblaster is not caesural but a wimp. sent16: the parishioner does not dance hilarity and is not a jagged if it is a kind of a Lille. sent17: that the ortolan spring-cleans matchbook but it is not a coconut does not hold if the orphrey is a greens. sent18: that the tulle is a kind of a graduality is not false. sent19: the orphrey greens if that the paca is a kind of a jagged is right. sent20: the orphrey spring-cleans matchbook if the ortolan is counterrevolutionary. sent21: the sandblaster is not caesural. sent22: if something does not spring-clean matchbook it is a graduality. sent23: the parishioner is a Lille if it is a filovirus. sent24: if that the sandblaster is a kind of unrepeatable thing that is counterrevolutionary is incorrect then the vitrification is not salamandriform. sent25: the tulle is a salami if the orphrey does spring-clean matchbook. sent26: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a salami and is not a kind of a graduality is incorrect then the ortolan does not spring-clean matchbook. sent27: if the sandblaster is a kind of non-caesural thing that is a wimp the ortolan is not repeatable.
sent27 & sent15 -> int1: the ortolan is not repeatable.; sent10 -> int2: that the ortolan is salamandriform hold if it is not repeatable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ortolan is salamandriform is right.; sent13 -> int4: if the ortolan is salamandriform it is counterrevolutionary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ortolan is counterrevolutionary.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the orphrey spring-cleans matchbook.; int6 & sent25 -> int7: the tulle is a kind of a salami.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tulle is a salami and it is a graduality is wrong.
sent6 -> int8: that the fact that the tulle is a salami and it is a graduality is true is not true if it is not salamandriform.; sent23 & sent8 -> int9: the parishioner is a kind of a Lille.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the parishioner does not dance hilarity and is not a jagged.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the publican is a kind of a jagged is correct.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is a kind of a jagged.; int12 & sent14 -> int13: the paca is a balderdash and/or a jagged.; int13 & sent2 & sent19 -> int14: that the orphrey greens is not false.; sent17 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the ortolan spring-cleans matchbook and is not a kind of a coconut is wrong.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that that it spring-cleans matchbook and is not a kind of a coconut does not hold.; int16 & sent7 -> int17: the sandblaster does not spring-clean matchbook.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it does not spring-clean matchbook.;
$hypothesis$ = that the tulle is a salami and is a graduality is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sandblaster is non-repeatable thing that is counterrevolutionary is not right if that the ortolan does not spring-clean matchbook is true. sent2: the orphrey does green if the paca is a kind of a balderdash. sent3: either everything is not a kind of a balderdash or it does not green or both. sent4: something that is non-salamandriform does not remove dazzle and is a kind of a phyle. sent5: if the parishioner does not dance hilarity and it is not a jagged then the publican is a kind of a jagged. sent6: if something is not salamandriform the fact that it is a salami that is a kind of a graduality is not true. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it does spring-clean matchbook and it is not a coconut is not correct then the sandblaster does not spring-clean matchbook. sent8: the parishioner is a filovirus. sent9: the ortolan is not unrepeatable if it is not a graduality. sent10: if something is not repeatable then it is salamandriform. sent11: if something is not a kind of a greens it is not a kind of a coconut. sent12: something is not a kind of a coconut if the fact that it is a kind of a balderdash does not hold. sent13: a salamandriform thing is not non-counterrevolutionary. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it jags is not incorrect the paca is a kind of a balderdash and/or it is a kind of a jags. sent15: the sandblaster is not caesural but a wimp. sent16: the parishioner does not dance hilarity and is not a jagged if it is a kind of a Lille. sent17: that the ortolan spring-cleans matchbook but it is not a coconut does not hold if the orphrey is a greens. sent18: that the tulle is a kind of a graduality is not false. sent19: the orphrey greens if that the paca is a kind of a jagged is right. sent20: the orphrey spring-cleans matchbook if the ortolan is counterrevolutionary. sent21: the sandblaster is not caesural. sent22: if something does not spring-clean matchbook it is a graduality. sent23: the parishioner is a Lille if it is a filovirus. sent24: if that the sandblaster is a kind of unrepeatable thing that is counterrevolutionary is incorrect then the vitrification is not salamandriform. sent25: the tulle is a salami if the orphrey does spring-clean matchbook. sent26: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a salami and is not a kind of a graduality is incorrect then the ortolan does not spring-clean matchbook. sent27: if the sandblaster is a kind of non-caesural thing that is a wimp the ortolan is not repeatable. ; $proof$ = 
sent27 & sent15 -> int1: the ortolan is not repeatable.; sent10 -> int2: that the ortolan is salamandriform hold if it is not repeatable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ortolan is salamandriform is right.; sent13 -> int4: if the ortolan is salamandriform it is counterrevolutionary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the ortolan is counterrevolutionary.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the orphrey spring-cleans matchbook.; int6 & sent25 -> int7: the tulle is a kind of a salami.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__