the Miss is not a ratatouille and not physical.
sent1: the aquatic either does disentangle or is a kind of a Urmia or both. sent2: if something does not send pigfish the orogeny is a Balaton that is paniculate. sent3: the aquatic does not disentangle and it is not physical if the Miss is visible. sent4: the Miss sends incipiency if it is not a ratatouille. sent5: the Miss reissues Miss. sent6: if the Miss is visible then the aquatic is not physical and it is not a Urmia. sent7: the aquatic is visible if it disentangles and/or is not a Urmia. sent8: the aquatic is a kind of a quarto. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does not send pigfish is true. sent10: if that the aquatic is not visible is not wrong the fact that it is pictographic is not wrong. sent11: if there is something such that it is a kind of Lithuanian thing that is a Balaton then the aquatic does not snowball aptitude. sent12: that the Miss is a kind of a ratatouille and/or is not a Urmia hold. sent13: if the aquatic is visible the Miss is not a ratatouille and it is not physical. sent14: if the aquatic is a ratatouille then the Miss is not physical and does not disentangle. sent15: if the Miss is visible the aquatic is not a Urmia and it does not disentangle. sent16: something is visible and/or a brickbat if it does not snowball aptitude. sent17: if something is visible then the fact that it is not a ratatouille and is not physical is not right. sent18: the orogeny does not consternate Banjul but it is Lithuanian. sent19: if either the Miss is a Urmia or it does not disentangle or both then it is physical. sent20: if the snuffer is non-physical it reissues fringed.
the fact that the Miss is not a kind of a ratatouille and it is not physical is incorrect.
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the Miss is not a ratatouille and it is not physical is incorrect if it is not invisible.; sent16 -> int2: if the aquatic does not snowball aptitude either it is visible or it is a brickbat or both.; sent18 -> int3: the orogeny is a Lithuanian.; sent9 & sent2 -> int4: the orogeny is a Balaton and is paniculate.; int4 -> int5: the orogeny is a Balaton.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the orogeny is Lithuanian and is a Balaton.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is both a Lithuanian and a Balaton.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the aquatic does not snowball aptitude.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the aquatic is visible and/or is a kind of a brickbat.;
$hypothesis$ = the Miss is not a ratatouille and not physical. ; $context$ = sent1: the aquatic either does disentangle or is a kind of a Urmia or both. sent2: if something does not send pigfish the orogeny is a Balaton that is paniculate. sent3: the aquatic does not disentangle and it is not physical if the Miss is visible. sent4: the Miss sends incipiency if it is not a ratatouille. sent5: the Miss reissues Miss. sent6: if the Miss is visible then the aquatic is not physical and it is not a Urmia. sent7: the aquatic is visible if it disentangles and/or is not a Urmia. sent8: the aquatic is a kind of a quarto. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does not send pigfish is true. sent10: if that the aquatic is not visible is not wrong the fact that it is pictographic is not wrong. sent11: if there is something such that it is a kind of Lithuanian thing that is a Balaton then the aquatic does not snowball aptitude. sent12: that the Miss is a kind of a ratatouille and/or is not a Urmia hold. sent13: if the aquatic is visible the Miss is not a ratatouille and it is not physical. sent14: if the aquatic is a ratatouille then the Miss is not physical and does not disentangle. sent15: if the Miss is visible the aquatic is not a Urmia and it does not disentangle. sent16: something is visible and/or a brickbat if it does not snowball aptitude. sent17: if something is visible then the fact that it is not a ratatouille and is not physical is not right. sent18: the orogeny does not consternate Banjul but it is Lithuanian. sent19: if either the Miss is a Urmia or it does not disentangle or both then it is physical. sent20: if the snuffer is non-physical it reissues fringed. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__