the bursting is prevented by that the deaminating Nepal occurs.
sent1: the topologicalness occurs if that the trapping does not occur but the telluricness happens is incorrect. sent2: the electrifying occurs. sent3: the interlude occurs if that the Quechuanness and/or the pecking carissa happens is true. sent4: the pecking pounder does not occur. sent5: that the endermicness occurs is prevented by that the trapping does not occur but the telluricness occurs. sent6: the spritz does not occur if the deaminating Nepal occurs but the endermicness does not occur. sent7: if the costing occurs the actioning happens. sent8: if the endermicness does not occur then the deaminating Nepal does not occur. sent9: the topologicalness happens if the trap occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deaminating Nepal occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the trap but the telluricness occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the endermicness does not occur.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the deaminating Nepal does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the trap does not occur but the telluricness happens is not correct.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the topologicalness happens.; int5 -> int6: either the topologicalness happens or the judgment occurs or both.;
that the spritz does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = the bursting is prevented by that the deaminating Nepal occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the topologicalness occurs if that the trapping does not occur but the telluricness happens is incorrect. sent2: the electrifying occurs. sent3: the interlude occurs if that the Quechuanness and/or the pecking carissa happens is true. sent4: the pecking pounder does not occur. sent5: that the endermicness occurs is prevented by that the trapping does not occur but the telluricness occurs. sent6: the spritz does not occur if the deaminating Nepal occurs but the endermicness does not occur. sent7: if the costing occurs the actioning happens. sent8: if the endermicness does not occur then the deaminating Nepal does not occur. sent9: the topologicalness happens if the trap occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deaminating Nepal occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the trap but the telluricness occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the endermicness does not occur.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the deaminating Nepal does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the trap does not occur but the telluricness happens is not correct.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the topologicalness happens.; int5 -> int6: either the topologicalness happens or the judgment occurs or both.; __UNKNOWN__