that there is something such that if that it does not contradistinguish tidiness and is pictographic does not hold then it is not cephalic does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if that it does not contradistinguish tidiness and it is pictographic does not hold then it is not non-cephalic. sent2: the macromolecule is not pictographic if it is not a lactifuge and does contradistinguish valine. sent3: if that that the macromolecule does not lapidify and is unsatisfactory is not correct hold then it contradistinguishes valine. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it does contradistinguish tidiness and it is pictographic does not hold it is not cephalic. sent5: if the majors does not nod Wollaston then it is not an occasion. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not contradistinguish tidiness and is pictographic then it is not cephalic. sent7: if the fact that the macromolecule does not nod Wollaston and is cephalic is not correct it does not crook causing. sent8: there is something such that if that it is incapable and does nod Gorgonocephalus does not hold it does not cancel gallamine. sent9: the macromolecule is non-cephalic if it does not contradistinguish tidiness and it is pictographic. sent10: if that the macromolecule does not contradistinguish tidiness but it is pictographic is not correct it is cephalic. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not civilian and contradistinguishes stoplight then it is not a Ichthyosauridae. sent12: the macromolecule is not cephalic if it contradistinguishes tidiness. sent13: if that the individual is not a doubling but it is a cyclostyle is not right then it is not cephalic. sent14: if that something is not a horsepond but it is a kind of a polymer is incorrect then it does not cancel elitism. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not pictographic then it is not cephalic. sent16: if the fact that that the inhalant is not attritional but a Fabian is incorrect is correct that it is not carnal is not wrong. sent17: if that that the altarpiece does not glamorize but it contradistinguishes tidiness is not wrong is not correct then it is preventable. sent18: if the fact that the macromolecule does not contradistinguish tidiness and is pictographic is incorrect it is not cephalic. sent19: there exists something such that if it contradistinguishes tidiness it is not cephalic.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a horsepond and is a polymer is not correct it does not cancel elitism.
sent14 -> int1: if that the fact that the anole is both not a horsepond and a polymer hold is wrong it does not cancel elitism.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it does not contradistinguish tidiness and is pictographic does not hold then it is not cephalic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it does not contradistinguish tidiness and it is pictographic does not hold then it is not non-cephalic. sent2: the macromolecule is not pictographic if it is not a lactifuge and does contradistinguish valine. sent3: if that that the macromolecule does not lapidify and is unsatisfactory is not correct hold then it contradistinguishes valine. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it does contradistinguish tidiness and it is pictographic does not hold it is not cephalic. sent5: if the majors does not nod Wollaston then it is not an occasion. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not contradistinguish tidiness and is pictographic then it is not cephalic. sent7: if the fact that the macromolecule does not nod Wollaston and is cephalic is not correct it does not crook causing. sent8: there is something such that if that it is incapable and does nod Gorgonocephalus does not hold it does not cancel gallamine. sent9: the macromolecule is non-cephalic if it does not contradistinguish tidiness and it is pictographic. sent10: if that the macromolecule does not contradistinguish tidiness but it is pictographic is not correct it is cephalic. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not civilian and contradistinguishes stoplight then it is not a Ichthyosauridae. sent12: the macromolecule is not cephalic if it contradistinguishes tidiness. sent13: if that the individual is not a doubling but it is a cyclostyle is not right then it is not cephalic. sent14: if that something is not a horsepond but it is a kind of a polymer is incorrect then it does not cancel elitism. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not pictographic then it is not cephalic. sent16: if the fact that that the inhalant is not attritional but a Fabian is incorrect is correct that it is not carnal is not wrong. sent17: if that that the altarpiece does not glamorize but it contradistinguishes tidiness is not wrong is not correct then it is preventable. sent18: if the fact that the macromolecule does not contradistinguish tidiness and is pictographic is incorrect it is not cephalic. sent19: there exists something such that if it contradistinguishes tidiness it is not cephalic. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__