the carrion is unaggressive.
sent1: if the petrel is aggressive then the carrion is non-graphics or does not inflate Izmir or both. sent2: The Izmir does inflate petrel. sent3: if something does not clump that it does not rekindle hold. sent4: if something is a phycology and it is a kind of a cesspool it is unaggressive. sent5: the harpsichordist is not a graphics but it is a Tashkent. sent6: the petrel does not inflate Izmir if it does not inflate cliff-brake and is a self-punishment. sent7: the carrion is not aggressive if that the harpsichordist is not full-term and it is not a kind of a graphics does not hold. sent8: something is a Tashkent if it does inflate Izmir. sent9: the fact that the zill is not hydrostatic but it inflates Izmir is not right. sent10: that the harpsichordist does not inflate cliff-brake and it is non-full-term does not hold. sent11: the zill is not a phycology if the petrel does not rekindle and is a Tashkent. sent12: the petrel does inflate Izmir. sent13: that the zill is hydrostatic and is not an ambiance does not hold. sent14: that the carrion does not inflate cliff-brake and is aggressive is wrong. sent15: if the zill does not hook carrion that the harpsichordist is not full-term but non-graphics does not hold. sent16: the contrivance is a cesspool. sent17: that the petrel does not rekindle is not false if it does not inflate cliff-brake. sent18: the fact that the zill is both not the self-punishment and hydrostatic if that the zill is not a kind of a phycology is not incorrect hold. sent19: the harpsichordist does clump. sent20: the contrivance does inflate Izmir. sent21: if something is both not a self-punishment and hydrostatic then it does not hook carrion. sent22: the fact that the zill is not a phycology and does not rekindle does not hold. sent23: that if the contrivance is a cesspool then either the petrel does not clump or it does not inflate cliff-brake or both is not incorrect.
sent3 -> int1: if the petrel does not clump it does not rekindle.; sent23 & sent16 -> int2: either the petrel does not clump or it does not inflate cliff-brake or both.; int1 & int2 & sent17 -> int3: the petrel does not rekindle.; sent8 -> int4: if the petrel inflates Izmir it is a kind of a Tashkent.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the petrel is a Tashkent.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the petrel does not rekindle but it is a kind of a Tashkent.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the zill is not a phycology.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the zill is not a kind of a self-punishment but it is hydrostatic.; sent21 -> int9: if the zill is not a self-punishment but it is hydrostatic the fact that it does not hook carrion is not wrong.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the zill does not hook carrion.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the fact that the harpsichordist is not full-term and it is not graphics is wrong.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the carrion is unaggressive. ; $context$ = sent1: if the petrel is aggressive then the carrion is non-graphics or does not inflate Izmir or both. sent2: The Izmir does inflate petrel. sent3: if something does not clump that it does not rekindle hold. sent4: if something is a phycology and it is a kind of a cesspool it is unaggressive. sent5: the harpsichordist is not a graphics but it is a Tashkent. sent6: the petrel does not inflate Izmir if it does not inflate cliff-brake and is a self-punishment. sent7: the carrion is not aggressive if that the harpsichordist is not full-term and it is not a kind of a graphics does not hold. sent8: something is a Tashkent if it does inflate Izmir. sent9: the fact that the zill is not hydrostatic but it inflates Izmir is not right. sent10: that the harpsichordist does not inflate cliff-brake and it is non-full-term does not hold. sent11: the zill is not a phycology if the petrel does not rekindle and is a Tashkent. sent12: the petrel does inflate Izmir. sent13: that the zill is hydrostatic and is not an ambiance does not hold. sent14: that the carrion does not inflate cliff-brake and is aggressive is wrong. sent15: if the zill does not hook carrion that the harpsichordist is not full-term but non-graphics does not hold. sent16: the contrivance is a cesspool. sent17: that the petrel does not rekindle is not false if it does not inflate cliff-brake. sent18: the fact that the zill is both not the self-punishment and hydrostatic if that the zill is not a kind of a phycology is not incorrect hold. sent19: the harpsichordist does clump. sent20: the contrivance does inflate Izmir. sent21: if something is both not a self-punishment and hydrostatic then it does not hook carrion. sent22: the fact that the zill is not a phycology and does not rekindle does not hold. sent23: that if the contrivance is a cesspool then either the petrel does not clump or it does not inflate cliff-brake or both is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the petrel does not clump it does not rekindle.; sent23 & sent16 -> int2: either the petrel does not clump or it does not inflate cliff-brake or both.; int1 & int2 & sent17 -> int3: the petrel does not rekindle.; sent8 -> int4: if the petrel inflates Izmir it is a kind of a Tashkent.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the petrel is a Tashkent.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the petrel does not rekindle but it is a kind of a Tashkent.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the zill is not a phycology.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the zill is not a kind of a self-punishment but it is hydrostatic.; sent21 -> int9: if the zill is not a self-punishment but it is hydrostatic the fact that it does not hook carrion is not wrong.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the zill does not hook carrion.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the fact that the harpsichordist is not full-term and it is not graphics is wrong.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__