the conventicle is a neckband.
sent1: the conventicle is a neckband if the shortstop is not a neckband and does impair maraca. sent2: if something includes it is forcipate. sent3: if the shortstop does include then the snakefly basks boxcars. sent4: something is not a unpalatability if it is not forcipate. sent5: if the snakefly basks boxcars the conventicle is not a kind of a neckband. sent6: if the cat's-claw impairs maraca the aneroid is dictatorial. sent7: the justice is a kind of a unpalatability if the aneroid is dictatorial. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is both a Centrocercus and not palatoglossal is not right then the justice is not forcipate. sent9: the fact that the cat's-claw impairs maraca hold if the shortstop does not include. sent10: the fact that the NOC is a kind of a Centrocercus and is not palatoglossal does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shortstop does not include.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the cat's-claw impairs maraca.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the aneroid is dictatorial.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the justice is a unpalatability.; sent4 -> int4: that if the justice is not forcipate then that the justice is not a unpalatability is not false is correct.; sent10 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is a Centrocercus but not palatoglossal is wrong.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that the justice is not forcipate is true.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the justice is not a unpalatability.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the shortstop includes.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the snakefly basks boxcars.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the conventicle is not a kind of a neckband is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the conventicle is a neckband. ; $context$ = sent1: the conventicle is a neckband if the shortstop is not a neckband and does impair maraca. sent2: if something includes it is forcipate. sent3: if the shortstop does include then the snakefly basks boxcars. sent4: something is not a unpalatability if it is not forcipate. sent5: if the snakefly basks boxcars the conventicle is not a kind of a neckband. sent6: if the cat's-claw impairs maraca the aneroid is dictatorial. sent7: the justice is a kind of a unpalatability if the aneroid is dictatorial. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is both a Centrocercus and not palatoglossal is not right then the justice is not forcipate. sent9: the fact that the cat's-claw impairs maraca hold if the shortstop does not include. sent10: the fact that the NOC is a kind of a Centrocercus and is not palatoglossal does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shortstop does not include.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the cat's-claw impairs maraca.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the aneroid is dictatorial.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the justice is a unpalatability.; sent4 -> int4: that if the justice is not forcipate then that the justice is not a unpalatability is not false is correct.; sent10 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is a Centrocercus but not palatoglossal is wrong.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that the justice is not forcipate is true.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the justice is not a unpalatability.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the shortstop includes.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the snakefly basks boxcars.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__