the fact that the hayfield is not a kind of a reception and/or it is a salmon is false.
sent1: if the fact that something either is photomechanical or does not jig or both does not hold it is campylotropous. sent2: that the straggler jigs and/or it does not falsify does not hold. sent3: the fact that either something is photomechanical or it is not a jig or both does not hold if it refrains Bridget. sent4: the fact that either something is a jig or it is not a salmon or both is not true if it is an extroverted. sent5: if the inside refrains Bridget then it is not photomechanical. sent6: the inside is not a kind of a jig or it is a salmon or both. sent7: that the straggler is not an extroverted is not correct. sent8: if something does refrain Bridget it is not photomechanical. sent9: the Gouda does not refrain Cunningham or it is a tidemark or both. sent10: the inside is not photomechanical. sent11: the fact that the metal does chain-smoke and/or is not a reception is false. sent12: the hayfield is a reception or is a salmon or both. sent13: the straggler is photomechanical. sent14: if the inside is campylotropous the hayfield is not a reception and/or is a salmon. sent15: the straggler is a kind of a salmon if the hayfield is an extroverted. sent16: the fact that the straggler is an extroverted or does not jig or both is wrong if it is campylotropous. sent17: if something is campylotropous and photomechanical it is not a kind of a jig. sent18: either the hayfield is a reception or it is a salmon or both if the fact that the inside is not non-campylotropous is not wrong. sent19: if the fact that something photostats Porte and/or it is not a fingerpost is incorrect it is a falcon. sent20: if the straggler is an extroverted then the inside does refrain Bridget. sent21: the inside is a peonage. sent22: that the straggler is a kind of a reception is not false. sent23: if the inside is a salmon then the hayfield is photomechanical.
sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the inside refrains Bridget.; sent3 -> int2: if the inside does refrain Bridget then the fact that it is photomechanical and/or it is not a kind of a jig is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the inside is photomechanical and/or it is not a jig is false.; sent1 -> int4: the inside is campylotropous if that either it is photomechanical or it is not a kind of a jig or both is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the inside is campylotropous.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
that the hayfield is not a reception and/or it is a salmon does not hold.
sent17 -> int6: the straggler is not a jig if it is campylotropous and photomechanical.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hayfield is not a kind of a reception and/or it is a salmon is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something either is photomechanical or does not jig or both does not hold it is campylotropous. sent2: that the straggler jigs and/or it does not falsify does not hold. sent3: the fact that either something is photomechanical or it is not a jig or both does not hold if it refrains Bridget. sent4: the fact that either something is a jig or it is not a salmon or both is not true if it is an extroverted. sent5: if the inside refrains Bridget then it is not photomechanical. sent6: the inside is not a kind of a jig or it is a salmon or both. sent7: that the straggler is not an extroverted is not correct. sent8: if something does refrain Bridget it is not photomechanical. sent9: the Gouda does not refrain Cunningham or it is a tidemark or both. sent10: the inside is not photomechanical. sent11: the fact that the metal does chain-smoke and/or is not a reception is false. sent12: the hayfield is a reception or is a salmon or both. sent13: the straggler is photomechanical. sent14: if the inside is campylotropous the hayfield is not a reception and/or is a salmon. sent15: the straggler is a kind of a salmon if the hayfield is an extroverted. sent16: the fact that the straggler is an extroverted or does not jig or both is wrong if it is campylotropous. sent17: if something is campylotropous and photomechanical it is not a kind of a jig. sent18: either the hayfield is a reception or it is a salmon or both if the fact that the inside is not non-campylotropous is not wrong. sent19: if the fact that something photostats Porte and/or it is not a fingerpost is incorrect it is a falcon. sent20: if the straggler is an extroverted then the inside does refrain Bridget. sent21: the inside is a peonage. sent22: that the straggler is a kind of a reception is not false. sent23: if the inside is a salmon then the hayfield is photomechanical. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the inside refrains Bridget.; sent3 -> int2: if the inside does refrain Bridget then the fact that it is photomechanical and/or it is not a kind of a jig is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the inside is photomechanical and/or it is not a jig is false.; sent1 -> int4: the inside is campylotropous if that either it is photomechanical or it is not a kind of a jig or both is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the inside is campylotropous.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__