there is something such that if that it does not straighten ballottement is not wrong then that the fact that it is not dramatic and/or it does not quell is not incorrect is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not non-burrlike then the fact that it is not a kind of a gneiss or it is not a Snow or both is false. sent2: that the torchlight is either not paleolithic or not dramatic or both is wrong if it is nonmetamorphic. sent3: the fact that the oregano is not holistic or it does not quell or both is not correct if it is not a Milanese. sent4: if something is not a prosecutor then the fact that it is not one-piece and/or it does not straighten ballottement does not hold. sent5: that the torchlight is not dramatic and/or does not quell is not correct if that it does not straighten ballottement is right.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the chela is not a prosecutor then the fact that it is not one-piece and/or it does not straighten ballottement does not hold.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does not straighten ballottement is not wrong then that the fact that it is not dramatic and/or it does not quell is not incorrect is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not non-burrlike then the fact that it is not a kind of a gneiss or it is not a Snow or both is false. sent2: that the torchlight is either not paleolithic or not dramatic or both is wrong if it is nonmetamorphic. sent3: the fact that the oregano is not holistic or it does not quell or both is not correct if it is not a Milanese. sent4: if something is not a prosecutor then the fact that it is not one-piece and/or it does not straighten ballottement does not hold. sent5: that the torchlight is not dramatic and/or does not quell is not correct if that it does not straighten ballottement is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__