that there exists something such that that it is not womanly and it premeditates actinometer is not right does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the foster-child is not a whole and it is not contractual is incorrect the lead-in is not a kind of a Weismann. sent2: there is something such that that it does band watercourse and is allophonic is wrong. sent3: the fact that the maypole is not womanly and premeditates actinometer is wrong if there is something such that that it is a whitecup is true. sent4: that something is not a Weismann and not unobjectionable is incorrect if it does not accelerate skilletfish. sent5: that the maypole is womanly and premeditates actinometer does not hold if there is something such that it is a whitecup. sent6: something is not womanly but it premeditates actinometer. sent7: the actinometer does accelerate skilletfish if there exists something such that it is a topee. sent8: the germander does accelerate skilletfish if the actinometer is not a kind of a Weismann. sent9: the germander accelerates skilletfish if the fact that that the actinometer is a Weismann but it is not unobjectionable is wrong is not incorrect. sent10: if the germander is not unwomanly then it is both not a whitecup and a topee. sent11: that the actinometer is a Weismann that is not unobjectionable is false if the lead-in is not a Weismann. sent12: the fact that the diplomat is a kind of a topee is true if the germander does accelerate skilletfish. sent13: that the lead-in is not a kind of a Weismann but it is whole is not right. sent14: there is something such that that it is a whole and a whitecup is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that that it is not a topee but unobjectionable does not hold. sent16: that the foster-child is a kind of a whole that is not contractual is not right. sent17: if the foster-child premeditates actinometer then the Sir premeditates actinometer. sent18: if something that is a Weismann is unobjectionable the foster-child premeditates actinometer. sent19: the fact that the foster-child is not a whole and it is not contractual is not true. sent20: something is a whitecup if it is a kind of a topee.
sent1 & sent19 -> int1: the lead-in is not a Weismann.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the actinometer is a kind of a Weismann but it is not unobjectionable is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the germander does accelerate skilletfish.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the diplomat is a topee.; sent20 -> int5: the diplomat is a whitecup if it is a topee.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the diplomat is a whitecup.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a whitecup.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the fact that the maypole is unwomanly and premeditates actinometer is not true.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the snailflower does premeditate actinometer.
sent4 -> int9: if the foster-child does not accelerate skilletfish that it is not a Weismann and is dirty is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that that it is not womanly and it premeditates actinometer is not right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the foster-child is not a whole and it is not contractual is incorrect the lead-in is not a kind of a Weismann. sent2: there is something such that that it does band watercourse and is allophonic is wrong. sent3: the fact that the maypole is not womanly and premeditates actinometer is wrong if there is something such that that it is a whitecup is true. sent4: that something is not a Weismann and not unobjectionable is incorrect if it does not accelerate skilletfish. sent5: that the maypole is womanly and premeditates actinometer does not hold if there is something such that it is a whitecup. sent6: something is not womanly but it premeditates actinometer. sent7: the actinometer does accelerate skilletfish if there exists something such that it is a topee. sent8: the germander does accelerate skilletfish if the actinometer is not a kind of a Weismann. sent9: the germander accelerates skilletfish if the fact that that the actinometer is a Weismann but it is not unobjectionable is wrong is not incorrect. sent10: if the germander is not unwomanly then it is both not a whitecup and a topee. sent11: that the actinometer is a Weismann that is not unobjectionable is false if the lead-in is not a Weismann. sent12: the fact that the diplomat is a kind of a topee is true if the germander does accelerate skilletfish. sent13: that the lead-in is not a kind of a Weismann but it is whole is not right. sent14: there is something such that that it is a whole and a whitecup is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that that it is not a topee but unobjectionable does not hold. sent16: that the foster-child is a kind of a whole that is not contractual is not right. sent17: if the foster-child premeditates actinometer then the Sir premeditates actinometer. sent18: if something that is a Weismann is unobjectionable the foster-child premeditates actinometer. sent19: the fact that the foster-child is not a whole and it is not contractual is not true. sent20: something is a whitecup if it is a kind of a topee. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent19 -> int1: the lead-in is not a Weismann.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the actinometer is a kind of a Weismann but it is not unobjectionable is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the germander does accelerate skilletfish.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the diplomat is a topee.; sent20 -> int5: the diplomat is a whitecup if it is a topee.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the diplomat is a whitecup.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a whitecup.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the fact that the maypole is unwomanly and premeditates actinometer is not true.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__