the celioscopy does not occur.
sent1: that the lathering dripstone occurs is brought about by that the combustion happens. sent2: if that the lathering dripstone occurs is not false the celioscopy happens. sent3: the depletion does not occur if the schooling does not occur. sent4: if the schooling happens then that the injecting but not the gravure occurs is not correct. sent5: the infantilism does not occur. sent6: the lathering dripstone occurs if the lathering daily occurs. sent7: that the infantilism does not occur yields that the injecting occurs and the gravure does not occur. sent8: that the gunfire happens leads to the unawaresness. sent9: the lathering daily and/or the combustion happens if the depletion does not occur. sent10: the fact that the lingering happens is correct if that the lathering daily happens hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schooling happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the injecting but not the gravure occurs does not hold.; sent7 & sent5 -> int2: the injecting occurs but the gravure does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the schooling does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the depletion does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the lathering daily happens or the combustion occurs or both.; int6 & sent6 & sent1 -> int7: the lathering dripstone happens.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the lingering and the non-handmadeness occurs is true.
$hypothesis$ = the celioscopy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lathering dripstone occurs is brought about by that the combustion happens. sent2: if that the lathering dripstone occurs is not false the celioscopy happens. sent3: the depletion does not occur if the schooling does not occur. sent4: if the schooling happens then that the injecting but not the gravure occurs is not correct. sent5: the infantilism does not occur. sent6: the lathering dripstone occurs if the lathering daily occurs. sent7: that the infantilism does not occur yields that the injecting occurs and the gravure does not occur. sent8: that the gunfire happens leads to the unawaresness. sent9: the lathering daily and/or the combustion happens if the depletion does not occur. sent10: the fact that the lingering happens is correct if that the lathering daily happens hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schooling happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the injecting but not the gravure occurs does not hold.; sent7 & sent5 -> int2: the injecting occurs but the gravure does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the schooling does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the depletion does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the lathering daily happens or the combustion occurs or both.; int6 & sent6 & sent1 -> int7: the lathering dripstone happens.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__