that the cytolysin is not a syllabary and is a kind of a escapologist is incorrect.
sent1: that there is something such that that it is positionable and it is not medieval is false is not false. sent2: something is a kind of a cut-in. sent3: something measures boo. sent4: something is a syllabary if it is a cut-in. sent5: if something is a hexagram then it is a escapologist. sent6: something is positionable and not medieval. sent7: there is something such that that it is a ouzo and it does not remonstrate epicranium is incorrect. sent8: if the leopardess is non-positionable the cytolysin is a kind of a bloodstream or it is a hexagram or both. sent9: if there exists something such that it is medieval then the leopardess is not positionable. sent10: the leopardess is not a rejection. sent11: if something is archaistic it is cinematic. sent12: the rensselaerite is not a syllabary. sent13: if something is undulatory it is a nectary. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a collection. sent15: if there is something such that that it is positionable and it is not medieval is wrong then the leopardess is not positionable. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a syllabary that is a kind of a escapologist is false. sent17: the rensselaerite measures boo. sent18: there is something such that that it is positionable and it is medieval is incorrect. sent19: if there is something such that it does not syllogize gurgle and it does measure boo then the fact that the cytolysin is not a syllabary is not incorrect. sent20: if something is a syllabary it does measure boo. sent21: something is a escapologist if it is a bloodstream. sent22: if there exists something such that that it does measure boo and it is not a kind of a hexagram is wrong the cytolysin does not measure boo. sent23: if there exists something such that it is a cut-in the rensselaerite does not syllogize gurgle but it measures boo. sent24: the lauhala is not Gallic.
sent2 & sent23 -> int1: the rensselaerite does not syllogize gurgle and does measure boo.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not syllogize gurgle and it does measure boo.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the cytolysin is not a kind of a syllabary.; sent1 & sent15 -> int4: the leopardess is not positionable.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the cytolysin is a bloodstream or it is a kind of a hexagram or both.; sent21 -> int6: if the cytolysin is a kind of a bloodstream then it is a escapologist.; sent5 -> int7: if the cytolysin is a kind of a hexagram then it is a escapologist.; int5 & int6 & int7 -> int8: the cytolysin is a kind of a escapologist.; int3 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cytolysin is not a syllabary but it is a escapologist is false.
sent4 -> int9: the rensselaerite is a kind of a syllabary if it is a cut-in.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cytolysin is not a syllabary and is a kind of a escapologist is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that there is something such that that it is positionable and it is not medieval is false is not false. sent2: something is a kind of a cut-in. sent3: something measures boo. sent4: something is a syllabary if it is a cut-in. sent5: if something is a hexagram then it is a escapologist. sent6: something is positionable and not medieval. sent7: there is something such that that it is a ouzo and it does not remonstrate epicranium is incorrect. sent8: if the leopardess is non-positionable the cytolysin is a kind of a bloodstream or it is a hexagram or both. sent9: if there exists something such that it is medieval then the leopardess is not positionable. sent10: the leopardess is not a rejection. sent11: if something is archaistic it is cinematic. sent12: the rensselaerite is not a syllabary. sent13: if something is undulatory it is a nectary. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a collection. sent15: if there is something such that that it is positionable and it is not medieval is wrong then the leopardess is not positionable. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a syllabary that is a kind of a escapologist is false. sent17: the rensselaerite measures boo. sent18: there is something such that that it is positionable and it is medieval is incorrect. sent19: if there is something such that it does not syllogize gurgle and it does measure boo then the fact that the cytolysin is not a syllabary is not incorrect. sent20: if something is a syllabary it does measure boo. sent21: something is a escapologist if it is a bloodstream. sent22: if there exists something such that that it does measure boo and it is not a kind of a hexagram is wrong the cytolysin does not measure boo. sent23: if there exists something such that it is a cut-in the rensselaerite does not syllogize gurgle but it measures boo. sent24: the lauhala is not Gallic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent23 -> int1: the rensselaerite does not syllogize gurgle and does measure boo.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not syllogize gurgle and it does measure boo.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the cytolysin is not a kind of a syllabary.; sent1 & sent15 -> int4: the leopardess is not positionable.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the cytolysin is a bloodstream or it is a kind of a hexagram or both.; sent21 -> int6: if the cytolysin is a kind of a bloodstream then it is a escapologist.; sent5 -> int7: if the cytolysin is a kind of a hexagram then it is a escapologist.; int5 & int6 & int7 -> int8: the cytolysin is a kind of a escapologist.; int3 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__