the designation and the antiferromagneticness occurs.
sent1: if the anagrammaticness happens then the fact that the honoring and the uneagerness occurs is not true. sent2: the nonalcoholicness happens. sent3: that the honoring happens and the uneagerness happens is incorrect. sent4: both the fatwa and the nonalcoholicness occurs. sent5: the contributing occurs if the besieging homo does not occur. sent6: the contributing occurs. sent7: that the crab does not occur is prevented by that the quincentennialness does not occur and the immersing happens. sent8: that not the honor but the uneagerness occurs is incorrect if the anagrammaticness occurs. sent9: the fatwa prevents the non-antiferromagneticness. sent10: that the honoring does not occur or the non-uneagerness or both is caused by that the antiferromagneticness does not occur. sent11: that the naturalization does not occur is brought about by that the designation does not occur. sent12: the fact that the viscometry and the propping snailfish happens is true if the impeaching does not occur. sent13: if the naturalization does not occur and the anaphrodisiacness happens then the anagrammaticness happens. sent14: the backing and the contributing happens if the besieging homo does not occur. sent15: the besieging homo does not occur. sent16: if the naturalization and the anaphrodisiacness occurs the anagrammaticness occurs. sent17: if the designation does not occur the naturalization does not occur and the anaphrodisiacness occurs. sent18: that not the honor but the uneagerness occurs is caused by that the backing occurs. sent19: the honoring brings about that the non-anagrammaticness and the uneagerness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the designation does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: not the naturalization but the anaphrodisiacness happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the anagrammaticness occurs hold.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that not the honoring but the uneagerness occurs is false.; sent14 & sent15 -> int4: the backedness and the contributing happens.; int4 -> int5: the backing happens.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the honoring does not occur but the uneagerness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the designation happens.; sent4 -> int9: that the fatwa happens is right.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the antiferromagneticness happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
both the circumnavigation and the mooring bookplate occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the designation and the antiferromagneticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the anagrammaticness happens then the fact that the honoring and the uneagerness occurs is not true. sent2: the nonalcoholicness happens. sent3: that the honoring happens and the uneagerness happens is incorrect. sent4: both the fatwa and the nonalcoholicness occurs. sent5: the contributing occurs if the besieging homo does not occur. sent6: the contributing occurs. sent7: that the crab does not occur is prevented by that the quincentennialness does not occur and the immersing happens. sent8: that not the honor but the uneagerness occurs is incorrect if the anagrammaticness occurs. sent9: the fatwa prevents the non-antiferromagneticness. sent10: that the honoring does not occur or the non-uneagerness or both is caused by that the antiferromagneticness does not occur. sent11: that the naturalization does not occur is brought about by that the designation does not occur. sent12: the fact that the viscometry and the propping snailfish happens is true if the impeaching does not occur. sent13: if the naturalization does not occur and the anaphrodisiacness happens then the anagrammaticness happens. sent14: the backing and the contributing happens if the besieging homo does not occur. sent15: the besieging homo does not occur. sent16: if the naturalization and the anaphrodisiacness occurs the anagrammaticness occurs. sent17: if the designation does not occur the naturalization does not occur and the anaphrodisiacness occurs. sent18: that not the honor but the uneagerness occurs is caused by that the backing occurs. sent19: the honoring brings about that the non-anagrammaticness and the uneagerness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the designation does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: not the naturalization but the anaphrodisiacness happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the anagrammaticness occurs hold.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that not the honoring but the uneagerness occurs is false.; sent14 & sent15 -> int4: the backedness and the contributing happens.; int4 -> int5: the backing happens.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the honoring does not occur but the uneagerness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the designation happens.; sent4 -> int9: that the fatwa happens is right.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the antiferromagneticness happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__