the pause does not occur.
sent1: if the blotting does not occur then the fact that the accident does not occur and the interlocking booking does not occur is incorrect. sent2: the appealableness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the callithumpianness does not occur and the sacking does not occur does not hold if the estrogenicness does not occur. sent4: if that the psychometricness does not occur and the topiary does not occur is not true the topiary happens. sent5: the fact that that the psychometricness does not occur and the topiary does not occur hold is incorrect if the meridionalness does not occur. sent6: the fact that that the callithumpianness happens is not correct hold. sent7: that that not the personifying firehouse but the proactiveness occurs is false is right. sent8: the sack does not occur. sent9: the meridionalness does not occur. sent10: if the estrogenicness happens and the topiary happens then the pause does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the estrogenicness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the callithumpianness does not occur and the sacking does not occur is not correct.; sent6 & sent8 -> int2: the callithumpianness does not occur and the sacking does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the estrogenicness occurs.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the psychometricness does not occur and the topiary does not occur does not hold.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the topiary happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the estrogenicness happens and the topiary occurs.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pause does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blotting does not occur then the fact that the accident does not occur and the interlocking booking does not occur is incorrect. sent2: the appealableness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the callithumpianness does not occur and the sacking does not occur does not hold if the estrogenicness does not occur. sent4: if that the psychometricness does not occur and the topiary does not occur is not true the topiary happens. sent5: the fact that that the psychometricness does not occur and the topiary does not occur hold is incorrect if the meridionalness does not occur. sent6: the fact that that the callithumpianness happens is not correct hold. sent7: that that not the personifying firehouse but the proactiveness occurs is false is right. sent8: the sack does not occur. sent9: the meridionalness does not occur. sent10: if the estrogenicness happens and the topiary happens then the pause does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the estrogenicness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the callithumpianness does not occur and the sacking does not occur is not correct.; sent6 & sent8 -> int2: the callithumpianness does not occur and the sacking does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the estrogenicness occurs.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the psychometricness does not occur and the topiary does not occur does not hold.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the topiary happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the estrogenicness happens and the topiary occurs.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__