the silverback is memberless but it is not heedless.
sent1: if the palate is not a startle that the antimony is a waxing and/or it is not less is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the oracle is a waxing and does disoblige radiography is not correct. sent3: if that something is not liberal and it is not a kind of a Hindustani is not correct then it is not a mason. sent4: the DC is federal and is Gallic. sent5: the palate is not a startle. sent6: the oracle does variegate Caporetto if the fact that that the antimony is a waxing and/or it is not less is wrong is correct. sent7: that something is not a waxing and disobliges radiography does not hold if that it is not a mason hold. sent8: that the sack is a kind of non-actinometric thing that is extraordinary is false if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-actinometric hold. sent9: the fact that the convalescence is actinometric hold. sent10: the DC is not extraordinary if that the fact that the sack is not actinometric and not extraordinary is incorrect is correct. sent11: the antimony variegates Caporetto and is extraordinary. sent12: if the DC is not heedless the silverback is memberless but it is not heedless. sent13: the fact that something is memberless but it is not heedless is not true if it is a mason. sent14: the DC is not heedless if the palate is less or it overcomes or both. sent15: if the oracle is a kind of non-liberal thing that is not a Hindustani the fact that the antimony does not variegate Caporetto is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the oracle is not a liberal and it is not a Hindustani hold.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the antimony does not variegate Caporetto is true.; sent11 -> int2: the antimony does variegate Caporetto.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the oracle is a kind of non-liberal thing that is not Hindustani is false.; sent3 -> int5: if the fact that the oracle is both non-liberal and not a Hindustani is not correct then it is not a mason.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the oracle is not a kind of a mason.; sent7 -> int7: the fact that the oracle is not a waxing but it does disoblige radiography is wrong if it is not a mason.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the oracle does not wax and disobliges radiography does not hold.;
that the silverback is memberless but it is heedful is wrong.
sent13 -> int9: if the silverback is a mason the fact that it is memberless and it is not heedless is not correct.; sent1 & sent5 -> int10: that either the antimony is a waxing or it is non-less or both is not true.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the oracle does variegate Caporetto.; sent9 -> int12: there is something such that it is actinometric.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: the fact that the sack is not actinometric and is extraordinary is wrong.; sent10 & int13 -> int14: the DC is not extraordinary.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it is not extraordinary.;
$hypothesis$ = the silverback is memberless but it is not heedless. ; $context$ = sent1: if the palate is not a startle that the antimony is a waxing and/or it is not less is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the oracle is a waxing and does disoblige radiography is not correct. sent3: if that something is not liberal and it is not a kind of a Hindustani is not correct then it is not a mason. sent4: the DC is federal and is Gallic. sent5: the palate is not a startle. sent6: the oracle does variegate Caporetto if the fact that that the antimony is a waxing and/or it is not less is wrong is correct. sent7: that something is not a waxing and disobliges radiography does not hold if that it is not a mason hold. sent8: that the sack is a kind of non-actinometric thing that is extraordinary is false if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-actinometric hold. sent9: the fact that the convalescence is actinometric hold. sent10: the DC is not extraordinary if that the fact that the sack is not actinometric and not extraordinary is incorrect is correct. sent11: the antimony variegates Caporetto and is extraordinary. sent12: if the DC is not heedless the silverback is memberless but it is not heedless. sent13: the fact that something is memberless but it is not heedless is not true if it is a mason. sent14: the DC is not heedless if the palate is less or it overcomes or both. sent15: if the oracle is a kind of non-liberal thing that is not a Hindustani the fact that the antimony does not variegate Caporetto is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the oracle is not a liberal and it is not a Hindustani hold.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the antimony does not variegate Caporetto is true.; sent11 -> int2: the antimony does variegate Caporetto.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the oracle is a kind of non-liberal thing that is not Hindustani is false.; sent3 -> int5: if the fact that the oracle is both non-liberal and not a Hindustani is not correct then it is not a mason.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the oracle is not a kind of a mason.; sent7 -> int7: the fact that the oracle is not a waxing but it does disoblige radiography is wrong if it is not a mason.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the oracle does not wax and disobliges radiography does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__