the adapting Eisenstaedt does not occur.
sent1: if not the quarterback but the hindrance happens the adapting Eisenstaedt happens. sent2: the embarrassment does not occur. sent3: the outnumbering telomerase does not occur if the decimating occurs and the reorienting monstera occurs. sent4: the hindrance is prevented by that the adapting Eisenstaedt happens and the quarterbacking occurs. sent5: the quarterbacking happens. sent6: that not the quarterbacking but the hindrance happens is not incorrect if the axillariness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the foliaceousness does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the isentropicness does not occur. sent9: that the foliaceousness does not occur triggers that both the hindrance and the axillariness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adapting Eisenstaedt happens.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the adapting Eisenstaedt happens and the quarterback occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the hindrance does not occur.; sent9 & sent7 -> int3: both the hindrance and the axillariness happens.; int3 -> int4: the hindrance happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the adapting Eisenstaedt happens.
$hypothesis$ = the adapting Eisenstaedt does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if not the quarterback but the hindrance happens the adapting Eisenstaedt happens. sent2: the embarrassment does not occur. sent3: the outnumbering telomerase does not occur if the decimating occurs and the reorienting monstera occurs. sent4: the hindrance is prevented by that the adapting Eisenstaedt happens and the quarterbacking occurs. sent5: the quarterbacking happens. sent6: that not the quarterbacking but the hindrance happens is not incorrect if the axillariness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the foliaceousness does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the isentropicness does not occur. sent9: that the foliaceousness does not occur triggers that both the hindrance and the axillariness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the adapting Eisenstaedt happens.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the adapting Eisenstaedt happens and the quarterback occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the hindrance does not occur.; sent9 & sent7 -> int3: both the hindrance and the axillariness happens.; int3 -> int4: the hindrance happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__