the Caucasian yields that the refraining lacrimation does not occur and the Incanness does not occur.
sent1: that the non-custard-likeness and the Incanness occurs is incorrect. sent2: that the intrusiveness but not the weather happens yields that the Caucasianness does not occur. sent3: the Incanness does not occur if that the non-custard-likeness and the Incanness happens is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the intrusiveness happens but the weathering does not occur.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the Caucasianness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Caucasian occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the intrusiveness but not the weather happens is not correct.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: that the Incanness does not occur is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the Caucasian yields that the refraining lacrimation does not occur and the Incanness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the non-custard-likeness and the Incanness occurs is incorrect. sent2: that the intrusiveness but not the weather happens yields that the Caucasianness does not occur. sent3: the Incanness does not occur if that the non-custard-likeness and the Incanness happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the intrusiveness happens but the weathering does not occur.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the Caucasianness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Caucasian occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the intrusiveness but not the weather happens is not correct.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: that the Incanness does not occur is correct.; __UNKNOWN__