that there is something such that the fact that either it is a crack or it is not a bran or both is not correct is incorrect.
sent1: if the organism is a bran then the fact that the T-square is a Tereshkova but it is not a kind of a lygaeid is incorrect. sent2: the fact that if the fact that the mung is not the crack and it is not aneurysmal is wrong then the mung is a Tereshkova is right. sent3: the organism does not crack. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a prorogation and/or it is not non-sacramental is false. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it cracks and/or it is not aneurysmal is wrong. sent6: if the T-square is a bran then that the organism is not a lygaeid but it is aneurysmal is not true. sent7: if the T-square is a bran that the organism is not a lygaeid and is not aneurysmal does not hold. sent8: if the fact that the organism is not a lygaeid and it is not aneurysmal does not hold that it is a Tereshkova is not incorrect. sent9: that the mung is a crack and/or not a bran is not true if the T-square is not a bran. sent10: if the T-square is aneurysmal then the fact that the organism is not a bran but it is a crack does not hold. sent11: the organism is not a Tereshkova.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the T-square is a bran.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the organism is both not a lygaeid and not aneurysmal is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the organism is a Tereshkova.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the T-square is not a bran.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the fact that the mung does crack or it is not a kind of a bran or both is not wrong is not right.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that the fact that either it is a crack or it is not a bran or both is not correct is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the organism is a bran then the fact that the T-square is a Tereshkova but it is not a kind of a lygaeid is incorrect. sent2: the fact that if the fact that the mung is not the crack and it is not aneurysmal is wrong then the mung is a Tereshkova is right. sent3: the organism does not crack. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a prorogation and/or it is not non-sacramental is false. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it cracks and/or it is not aneurysmal is wrong. sent6: if the T-square is a bran then that the organism is not a lygaeid but it is aneurysmal is not true. sent7: if the T-square is a bran that the organism is not a lygaeid and is not aneurysmal does not hold. sent8: if the fact that the organism is not a lygaeid and it is not aneurysmal does not hold that it is a Tereshkova is not incorrect. sent9: that the mung is a crack and/or not a bran is not true if the T-square is not a bran. sent10: if the T-square is aneurysmal then the fact that the organism is not a bran but it is a crack does not hold. sent11: the organism is not a Tereshkova. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the T-square is a bran.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the organism is both not a lygaeid and not aneurysmal is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the organism is a Tereshkova.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the T-square is not a bran.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the fact that the mung does crack or it is not a kind of a bran or both is not wrong is not right.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__