the reflection is not gutsy.
sent1: something is discomycetous if it is not a kind of a fiduciary and it is a kind of a effacement. sent2: if a non-fiduciary thing is not a effacement it is discomycetous. sent3: something is discomycetous if it is a fiduciary and is not a effacement. sent4: the reflection is discomycetous if it is not a kind of a fiduciary and it is a effacement. sent5: if that something is a kind of costal thing that does gin weevil is not true that it does not gin weevil is correct. sent6: the reflection does not clear and it does not reprise offense. sent7: something that does not gin weevil is surgical and is not gutsy. sent8: something is not fiduciary if it does not out and it is discomycetous. sent9: the reflection is not out. sent10: if the weevil is a kind of a knackered then it is a phentolamine. sent11: something that stares Kivu is a meteorite. sent12: the dibble is both not an out and discomycetous if the reflection is not gutsy. sent13: that if that the reflection is not the out is not false then the reflection is not emulous and is not a kind of a counterclaim is correct. sent14: if the reflection is non-out then it is both not fiduciary and not a effacement. sent15: the reflection is discomycetous if it is a fiduciary but not a effacement. sent16: if something is discomycetous then it is gutsy. sent17: the entomologist is not costal. sent18: the reflection is surgical and it does gin weevil if it is not an australopithecine.
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: the reflection is not a kind of a fiduciary and it is not a kind of a effacement.; sent2 -> int2: if the reflection is not fiduciary and not a effacement it is discomycetous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reflection is discomycetous.; sent16 -> int4: the fact that the reflection is gutsy is not wrong if it is discomycetous.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the dibble is not a kind of a fiduciary.
sent8 -> int5: if the dibble is not an out but it is discomycetous it is not a kind of a fiduciary.; sent7 -> int6: the reflection is both surgical and not gutsy if it does not gin weevil.; sent5 -> int7: if that the reflection is costal and gins weevil does not hold it does not gins weevil.; sent17 -> int8: there exists something such that it is non-costal.;
$hypothesis$ = the reflection is not gutsy. ; $context$ = sent1: something is discomycetous if it is not a kind of a fiduciary and it is a kind of a effacement. sent2: if a non-fiduciary thing is not a effacement it is discomycetous. sent3: something is discomycetous if it is a fiduciary and is not a effacement. sent4: the reflection is discomycetous if it is not a kind of a fiduciary and it is a effacement. sent5: if that something is a kind of costal thing that does gin weevil is not true that it does not gin weevil is correct. sent6: the reflection does not clear and it does not reprise offense. sent7: something that does not gin weevil is surgical and is not gutsy. sent8: something is not fiduciary if it does not out and it is discomycetous. sent9: the reflection is not out. sent10: if the weevil is a kind of a knackered then it is a phentolamine. sent11: something that stares Kivu is a meteorite. sent12: the dibble is both not an out and discomycetous if the reflection is not gutsy. sent13: that if that the reflection is not the out is not false then the reflection is not emulous and is not a kind of a counterclaim is correct. sent14: if the reflection is non-out then it is both not fiduciary and not a effacement. sent15: the reflection is discomycetous if it is a fiduciary but not a effacement. sent16: if something is discomycetous then it is gutsy. sent17: the entomologist is not costal. sent18: the reflection is surgical and it does gin weevil if it is not an australopithecine. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: the reflection is not a kind of a fiduciary and it is not a kind of a effacement.; sent2 -> int2: if the reflection is not fiduciary and not a effacement it is discomycetous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reflection is discomycetous.; sent16 -> int4: the fact that the reflection is gutsy is not wrong if it is discomycetous.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__