the synovialness happens.
sent1: that the corresponding streetcar does not occur is not right. sent2: the avianness does not occur. sent3: the antisepticizing infallibility happens. sent4: both the whiz and the backing happens. sent5: the flushed occurs. sent6: the heterotrophicness and the whiz happens if the backing does not occur. sent7: the backing happens. sent8: the advisableness occurs. sent9: that the synovialness does not occur is brought about by that both the whiz and the helming occurs. sent10: the advisableness prevents that the helm does not occur.
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the helm occurs.; sent4 -> int2: the whiz occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the whiz occurs and the helming happens.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
both the prayer and the heterotrophicness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the synovialness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the corresponding streetcar does not occur is not right. sent2: the avianness does not occur. sent3: the antisepticizing infallibility happens. sent4: both the whiz and the backing happens. sent5: the flushed occurs. sent6: the heterotrophicness and the whiz happens if the backing does not occur. sent7: the backing happens. sent8: the advisableness occurs. sent9: that the synovialness does not occur is brought about by that both the whiz and the helming occurs. sent10: the advisableness prevents that the helm does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the helm occurs.; sent4 -> int2: the whiz occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the whiz occurs and the helming happens.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__