the jacketing maidenliness occurs or the deflowering redneck occurs or both.
sent1: that the deflowering waxwork occurs is brought about by that the stumbling happens. sent2: that the ignoring luff happens is brought about by that the rappeling does not occur. sent3: if the jacketing maidenliness but not the deflowering redneck occurs the intemperateness does not occur. sent4: that the ignoring luff happens is prevented by that the rappeling does not occur. sent5: if the rearmament happens the deflowering flannelette happens and/or the Michelangelesqueness does not occur. sent6: the crediting does not occur. sent7: that the hypotonicity happens brings about that the intemperateness happens. sent8: the Mass does not occur if the mistaking does not occur. sent9: the rotation happens. sent10: the ignoring luff does not occur if the deflowering combo happens. sent11: if the chandelle happens the deflowering combo happens and/or the rappel does not occur. sent12: the storming occurs and/or the hunting does not occur. sent13: the chandelling happens. sent14: the admixture happens. sent15: the palatalizing interoception does not occur. sent16: that the ignoring luff occurs is caused by that the voluntariness happens. sent17: that the intemperateness occurs prevents that the jacketing maidenliness does not occur. sent18: that the minimalistness happens is not incorrect. sent19: the hypotonicity happens if the surfing does not occur. sent20: that the voluntariness happens is brought about by that the surfing happens. sent21: if the unplugging happens then the noncriticalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the surfing happens.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the voluntary occurs is true.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the ignoring luff occurs.; sent11 & sent13 -> int3: either the deflowering combo occurs or the rappeling does not occur or both.; int3 & sent10 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the ignoring luff does not occur is not false.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the surfing does not occur.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the hypotonicity occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the intemperateness occurs.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the jacketing maidenliness occurs.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the unplugging happens.
$hypothesis$ = the jacketing maidenliness occurs or the deflowering redneck occurs or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the deflowering waxwork occurs is brought about by that the stumbling happens. sent2: that the ignoring luff happens is brought about by that the rappeling does not occur. sent3: if the jacketing maidenliness but not the deflowering redneck occurs the intemperateness does not occur. sent4: that the ignoring luff happens is prevented by that the rappeling does not occur. sent5: if the rearmament happens the deflowering flannelette happens and/or the Michelangelesqueness does not occur. sent6: the crediting does not occur. sent7: that the hypotonicity happens brings about that the intemperateness happens. sent8: the Mass does not occur if the mistaking does not occur. sent9: the rotation happens. sent10: the ignoring luff does not occur if the deflowering combo happens. sent11: if the chandelle happens the deflowering combo happens and/or the rappel does not occur. sent12: the storming occurs and/or the hunting does not occur. sent13: the chandelling happens. sent14: the admixture happens. sent15: the palatalizing interoception does not occur. sent16: that the ignoring luff occurs is caused by that the voluntariness happens. sent17: that the intemperateness occurs prevents that the jacketing maidenliness does not occur. sent18: that the minimalistness happens is not incorrect. sent19: the hypotonicity happens if the surfing does not occur. sent20: that the voluntariness happens is brought about by that the surfing happens. sent21: if the unplugging happens then the noncriticalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the surfing happens.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the voluntary occurs is true.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the ignoring luff occurs.; sent11 & sent13 -> int3: either the deflowering combo occurs or the rappeling does not occur or both.; int3 & sent10 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the ignoring luff does not occur is not false.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the surfing does not occur.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the hypotonicity occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the intemperateness occurs.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the jacketing maidenliness occurs.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__