the barring radiance prevents that the rebound does not occur.
sent1: if that the tension happens but the numerating Newport does not occur is not correct then the tension does not occur. sent2: the fact that the indecentness does not occur and the grading does not occur does not hold if the barring roundel happens. sent3: the contemplation causes the walk-in. sent4: the walk-in happens. sent5: the grading does not occur. sent6: the biologism occurs. sent7: if that the non-achromaticness and the non-physiotherapeuticness occurs is not correct the numerating X-SCID does not occur. sent8: if the barring radiance does not occur then the ministering and the barring roundel occurs. sent9: the indecentness does not occur. sent10: if the tension does not occur the fact that the rebound does not occur hold. sent11: if the barring radiance occurs but the barring roundel does not occur then the rebound happens. sent12: the fact that the tension happens and the numerating Newport does not occur is not correct if the numerating X-SCID does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the barring roundel occurs.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the indecentness does not occur and the grading does not occur does not hold.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the indecentness does not occur and the grading does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the barring roundel does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barring radiance occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the barring radiance happens but the barring roundel does not occur.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the rebound occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the minister occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the barring radiance prevents that the rebound does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the tension happens but the numerating Newport does not occur is not correct then the tension does not occur. sent2: the fact that the indecentness does not occur and the grading does not occur does not hold if the barring roundel happens. sent3: the contemplation causes the walk-in. sent4: the walk-in happens. sent5: the grading does not occur. sent6: the biologism occurs. sent7: if that the non-achromaticness and the non-physiotherapeuticness occurs is not correct the numerating X-SCID does not occur. sent8: if the barring radiance does not occur then the ministering and the barring roundel occurs. sent9: the indecentness does not occur. sent10: if the tension does not occur the fact that the rebound does not occur hold. sent11: if the barring radiance occurs but the barring roundel does not occur then the rebound happens. sent12: the fact that the tension happens and the numerating Newport does not occur is not correct if the numerating X-SCID does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the barring roundel occurs.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the indecentness does not occur and the grading does not occur does not hold.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the indecentness does not occur and the grading does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the barring roundel does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barring radiance occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the barring radiance happens but the barring roundel does not occur.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the rebound occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__