that the insulation is an engineer that is non-adrenal hold.
sent1: the Almoravid is not a demon. sent2: something is urogenital if it does not laicize ink and is nomothetic. sent3: if something is urogenital it does shuck and it is not a demon. sent4: if the insulation is not a classical then the dimmer does not laicize ink and is nomothetic. sent5: if that the insulation is a kind of an engineer and is not an adrenal is wrong then the Almoravid is a kind of a demon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the insulation is both an engineer and not an adrenal is false.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the Almoravid is a demon.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the dimmer does shuck but it is not a demon.
sent3 -> int3: the dimmer does shuck but it is not a demon if it is urogenital.; sent2 -> int4: the dimmer is urogenital if the fact that it does not laicize ink and it is nomothetic is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the insulation is an engineer that is non-adrenal hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Almoravid is not a demon. sent2: something is urogenital if it does not laicize ink and is nomothetic. sent3: if something is urogenital it does shuck and it is not a demon. sent4: if the insulation is not a classical then the dimmer does not laicize ink and is nomothetic. sent5: if that the insulation is a kind of an engineer and is not an adrenal is wrong then the Almoravid is a kind of a demon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the insulation is both an engineer and not an adrenal is false.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the Almoravid is a demon.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__