the galvanometer is not keyless.
sent1: if something populates esthetician that it casts squall and it is not a kind of a customs is not correct. sent2: the fact that the con is a flavorsomeness but it is not a motile is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that that it does not populate reserved and is a kind of a totipotency is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the con is keyless and it is a greyhound is not wrong if the ramona is not a kind of a Hegel. sent5: the fact that the goral populates reserved but it is not a totipotency is not right. sent6: the modification does not crow. sent7: the con is keyless if it is a customs. sent8: the fact that the goral does not populate reserved and is not a totipotency is wrong. sent9: if the modification is both a granddaughter and a streaming then that the crustacean is not a kind of a streaming is true. sent10: the fact that the embroidery is not a greyhound and it is not a Hegel is not true if the con is keyless. sent11: if that something is not a streaming is right then the lysogenization does populate esthetician. sent12: the con is a greyhound if there is something such that that it does not populate reserved and is not a totipotency does not hold. sent13: The squall casts con. sent14: the galvanometer is not keyless if something that is a Hegel does cast squall. sent15: the con is keyless. sent16: if the modification is not a kind of a crow then it is a granddaughter and a streaming. sent17: the con casts squall. sent18: the con is a Hegel if it is a greyhound.
sent8 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does not populate reserved and is not a totipotency is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the con is a kind of a greyhound.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the con is a Hegel.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the con is a kind of a Hegel and does cast squall.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Hegel and it casts squall.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the embroidery casts squall.
$hypothesis$ = the galvanometer is not keyless. ; $context$ = sent1: if something populates esthetician that it casts squall and it is not a kind of a customs is not correct. sent2: the fact that the con is a flavorsomeness but it is not a motile is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that that it does not populate reserved and is a kind of a totipotency is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the con is keyless and it is a greyhound is not wrong if the ramona is not a kind of a Hegel. sent5: the fact that the goral populates reserved but it is not a totipotency is not right. sent6: the modification does not crow. sent7: the con is keyless if it is a customs. sent8: the fact that the goral does not populate reserved and is not a totipotency is wrong. sent9: if the modification is both a granddaughter and a streaming then that the crustacean is not a kind of a streaming is true. sent10: the fact that the embroidery is not a greyhound and it is not a Hegel is not true if the con is keyless. sent11: if that something is not a streaming is right then the lysogenization does populate esthetician. sent12: the con is a greyhound if there is something such that that it does not populate reserved and is not a totipotency does not hold. sent13: The squall casts con. sent14: the galvanometer is not keyless if something that is a Hegel does cast squall. sent15: the con is keyless. sent16: if the modification is not a kind of a crow then it is a granddaughter and a streaming. sent17: the con casts squall. sent18: the con is a Hegel if it is a greyhound. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does not populate reserved and is not a totipotency is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the con is a kind of a greyhound.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the con is a Hegel.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the con is a kind of a Hegel and does cast squall.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Hegel and it casts squall.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__