that that the politeness occurs but the by-election does not occur is not correct if the fact that the thermoelectricness happens is not false is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the nod occurs but the Baptisticness does not occur is not true if the resistlessness happens. sent2: that the declaring and the non-Glaswegianness occurs does not hold. sent3: the scudding happens. sent4: the unimodalness occurs. sent5: that the cursorialness and the non-phyllodialness happens does not hold. sent6: if the thermoelectricness occurs the politeness but not the by-election happens. sent7: if the fictionalization occurs but the depression does not occur then the ridding Peristedion does not occur. sent8: the politeness occurs. sent9: if the thermoelectricness occurs that the politeness and the by-election happens is not right. sent10: the fact that the thermoelectricness does not occur is true if the politeness occurs but the by-election does not occur. sent11: the by-election does not occur. sent12: the postprandialness occurs and the literature does not occur. sent13: the fact that the politeness and the by-election happens is false. sent14: that the hanging occurs is not false. sent15: the thermoelectricness does not occur if both the politeness and the by-election happens. sent16: the Moravianness does not occur. sent17: that the nonprescriptionness happens but the pyroelectricity does not occur prevents that the ringing occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the politeness but not the by-election happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the thermoelectricness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the thermoelectricness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the politeness happens but the by-election does not occur is not right.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the politeness occurs but the by-election does not occur is not correct if the fact that the thermoelectricness happens is not false is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the nod occurs but the Baptisticness does not occur is not true if the resistlessness happens. sent2: that the declaring and the non-Glaswegianness occurs does not hold. sent3: the scudding happens. sent4: the unimodalness occurs. sent5: that the cursorialness and the non-phyllodialness happens does not hold. sent6: if the thermoelectricness occurs the politeness but not the by-election happens. sent7: if the fictionalization occurs but the depression does not occur then the ridding Peristedion does not occur. sent8: the politeness occurs. sent9: if the thermoelectricness occurs that the politeness and the by-election happens is not right. sent10: the fact that the thermoelectricness does not occur is true if the politeness occurs but the by-election does not occur. sent11: the by-election does not occur. sent12: the postprandialness occurs and the literature does not occur. sent13: the fact that the politeness and the by-election happens is false. sent14: that the hanging occurs is not false. sent15: the thermoelectricness does not occur if both the politeness and the by-election happens. sent16: the Moravianness does not occur. sent17: that the nonprescriptionness happens but the pyroelectricity does not occur prevents that the ringing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the politeness but not the by-election happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the thermoelectricness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the thermoelectricness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the politeness happens but the by-election does not occur is not right.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__