there exists something such that if it is not nautical then the fact that it is not a rip and does average Arno does not hold.
sent1: the hemiparasite does not rip. sent2: the fact that the epicranium is a kind of a rip that does average Arno does not hold if that it is not nautical hold. sent3: the fact that the epicranium is not a slug and is a brick is not right. sent4: if the whitefish does not scuff stereotype the fact that it is a kind of non-sepaloid a Cerberus is not true. sent5: if that the epicranium does not scuff stereotype and averages Arno does not hold then that the stair-rod does averages Arno is not incorrect. sent6: the epicranium does not average whitefish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epicranium does not rip and averages Arno.;
the stair-rod does average Arno.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not nautical then the fact that it is not a rip and does average Arno does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the hemiparasite does not rip. sent2: the fact that the epicranium is a kind of a rip that does average Arno does not hold if that it is not nautical hold. sent3: the fact that the epicranium is not a slug and is a brick is not right. sent4: if the whitefish does not scuff stereotype the fact that it is a kind of non-sepaloid a Cerberus is not true. sent5: if that the epicranium does not scuff stereotype and averages Arno does not hold then that the stair-rod does averages Arno is not incorrect. sent6: the epicranium does not average whitefish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epicranium does not rip and averages Arno.; __UNKNOWN__