something is circulative but it is not pure.
sent1: the fact that if there is something such that that it is a Saratoga and thermohydrometric is false then the brake is not a bratwurst is right. sent2: everything is a Major. sent3: there is something such that it is circulative. sent4: something is not a guarded if the fact that it is pure and it is not circulative is not correct. sent5: something is happy and it is basiscopic. sent6: that the diary is erecting but it does not glamorize plasterboard is false if the brake is not a bratwurst. sent7: if the fact that something is a kind of a signature and/or concretizes beetroot is correct then the sloganeer is not dystopian. sent8: if something is not dystopian that it is pure thing that is not circulative is not right. sent9: the prosthion does slash but it does not concretize estazolam. sent10: the tear is a kind of a brink that does concretize beetroot if something is a corespondent. sent11: if something is not erecting that it does not commission and/or is a kind of a Johnson is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that it is both circulative and pure. sent13: that the corker is a Saratoga and it is thermohydrometric is not correct. sent14: if the fact that something is a kind of erecting thing that does not glamorize plasterboard is wrong then it is not erecting. sent15: if the fact that something is not a commission and/or it is a Johnson is not right it is a kind of a corespondent. sent16: everything is circulative.
sent16 -> int1: the coriander is circulative.;
the sloganeer is not a guarded.
sent4 -> int2: if that the fact that the sloganeer is pure but it is not circulative is wrong is correct it is not a guarded.; sent8 -> int3: that the sloganeer is pure and is not circulative is not right if that it is not dystopian is true.; sent15 -> int4: if that either the diary is not a commission or it is a Johnson or both does not hold then it is a kind of a corespondent.; sent11 -> int5: that the diary either is not a commission or is a Johnson or both is not true if it is not erecting.; sent14 -> int6: the diary is not erecting if the fact that it is erecting and it does not glamorize plasterboard is false.; sent13 -> int7: that there is something such that the fact that it is a Saratoga and thermohydrometric does not hold is not false.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the brake is not a kind of a bratwurst.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the diary is erecting but it does not glamorize plasterboard is false.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the diary is not erecting.; int5 & int10 -> int11: that the diary is not a commission and/or it is a Johnson is not right.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the diary is a corespondent.; int12 -> int13: that there exists something such that it is a corespondent is not incorrect.; int13 & sent10 -> int14: the tear is a brink and it does concretize beetroot.; int14 -> int15: the tear concretizes beetroot.; int15 -> int16: the tear is a kind of a signature and/or concretizes beetroot.; int16 -> int17: something either is a kind of a signature or concretizes beetroot or both.; int17 & sent7 -> int18: the sloganeer is not dystopian.; int3 & int18 -> int19: that the sloganeer is pure and not circulative is incorrect.; int2 & int19 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = something is circulative but it is not pure. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if there is something such that that it is a Saratoga and thermohydrometric is false then the brake is not a bratwurst is right. sent2: everything is a Major. sent3: there is something such that it is circulative. sent4: something is not a guarded if the fact that it is pure and it is not circulative is not correct. sent5: something is happy and it is basiscopic. sent6: that the diary is erecting but it does not glamorize plasterboard is false if the brake is not a bratwurst. sent7: if the fact that something is a kind of a signature and/or concretizes beetroot is correct then the sloganeer is not dystopian. sent8: if something is not dystopian that it is pure thing that is not circulative is not right. sent9: the prosthion does slash but it does not concretize estazolam. sent10: the tear is a kind of a brink that does concretize beetroot if something is a corespondent. sent11: if something is not erecting that it does not commission and/or is a kind of a Johnson is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that it is both circulative and pure. sent13: that the corker is a Saratoga and it is thermohydrometric is not correct. sent14: if the fact that something is a kind of erecting thing that does not glamorize plasterboard is wrong then it is not erecting. sent15: if the fact that something is not a commission and/or it is a Johnson is not right it is a kind of a corespondent. sent16: everything is circulative. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the coriander is circulative.; __UNKNOWN__