that the butyl does not excise Unitarian and is not a snuff is not wrong if the skyhook does not unsaddle.
sent1: if the butyl is not a snuff then the skyhook excises Unitarian but it does not unsaddle. sent2: if the butyl does not excise Unitarian then the skyhook does not unsaddle and does not snuff. sent3: the butyl does not excise Unitarian if the skyhook does not unsaddle. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not unsaddle the butyl does not excise Unitarian. sent5: if the palmitin is not defeasible then the butyl excises Unitarian and is a snuff. sent6: the butyl does not excise Unitarian and is not a snuff if there exists something such that it does not unsaddle. sent7: something does not unsaddle and is not a backwater if it does excise Unitarian. sent8: the butyl does not excise Unitarian and it is not a snuff if there is something such that it unsaddles. sent9: the tapestry does excise Unitarian if the butyl excise Unitarian. sent10: the palmitin is not defeasible but a blend if the quaffer is a Tantrist. sent11: the skyhook is not a Rastafarian and it does not unsaddle.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skyhook does not unsaddle.; assump1 -> int1: something does not unsaddle.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the butyl does not excise Unitarian and does not snuff.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tapestry does not unsaddle and is not a kind of a backwater is not incorrect.
sent7 -> int3: if the tapestry does excise Unitarian then it does not unsaddle and it is not a backwater.;
$hypothesis$ = that the butyl does not excise Unitarian and is not a snuff is not wrong if the skyhook does not unsaddle. ; $context$ = sent1: if the butyl is not a snuff then the skyhook excises Unitarian but it does not unsaddle. sent2: if the butyl does not excise Unitarian then the skyhook does not unsaddle and does not snuff. sent3: the butyl does not excise Unitarian if the skyhook does not unsaddle. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not unsaddle the butyl does not excise Unitarian. sent5: if the palmitin is not defeasible then the butyl excises Unitarian and is a snuff. sent6: the butyl does not excise Unitarian and is not a snuff if there exists something such that it does not unsaddle. sent7: something does not unsaddle and is not a backwater if it does excise Unitarian. sent8: the butyl does not excise Unitarian and it is not a snuff if there is something such that it unsaddles. sent9: the tapestry does excise Unitarian if the butyl excise Unitarian. sent10: the palmitin is not defeasible but a blend if the quaffer is a Tantrist. sent11: the skyhook is not a Rastafarian and it does not unsaddle. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skyhook does not unsaddle.; assump1 -> int1: something does not unsaddle.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the butyl does not excise Unitarian and does not snuff.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__