the greenhouse occurs and the worthy occurs.
sent1: that the inclementness occurs but the romanticness does not occur is true if the rut does not occur. sent2: the crutch occurs. sent3: that the diocesan happens and the geophysicalness happens leads to that the inclementness does not occur. sent4: that both the ostomy and the impacting pygmy happens is false. sent5: if the improperness does not occur then the penetrableness but not the burglary occurs. sent6: if the geophysicalness does not occur then that the greenhouseness and the worthiness occurs is not true. sent7: that the outerness and the bloomer occurs does not hold. sent8: that the outerness does not occur is prevented by that the rutting does not occur and the anastomoticness does not occur. sent9: that the emanating does not occur is prevented by that not the masonry but the rounders occurs. sent10: that the romanticness happens and the inclementness does not occur is wrong if the outerness happens. sent11: that the propagativeness and the likeness happens is wrong. sent12: the rutting does not occur and the anastomoticness occurs. sent13: both the geophysicalness and the bloomer happens if the run does not occur. sent14: the diocesanness happens if not the bloomer but the estrogenicness happens. sent15: if the diocesanness does not occur then the fact that the non-greenhouseness and the non-estrogenicness happens does not hold. sent16: the anastomoticness happens. sent17: the romantic does not occur. sent18: that if that the greenhouse does not occur and the estrogenicness does not occur is not true the greenhouse happens hold. sent19: the bloomer does not occur if that the outerness happens and the bloomer happens is wrong. sent20: if the monetization happens the estrogenicness happens. sent21: if the fact that the rutting does not occur is not false the romanticness does not occur. sent22: the monetization occurs.
sent20 & sent22 -> int1: that the estrogenicness happens is correct.; sent19 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the bloomer does not occur is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bloomer does not occur but the estrogenicness happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the diocesan happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the geophysicalness happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the diocesanness occurs and the geophysicalness occurs.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the inclementness does not occur.; sent12 -> int7: the rut does not occur.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: both the inclementness and the non-romanticness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the inclementness occurs.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the geophysicalness does not occur.; int11 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
both the greenhouseness and the worthiness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the greenhouse occurs and the worthy occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the inclementness occurs but the romanticness does not occur is true if the rut does not occur. sent2: the crutch occurs. sent3: that the diocesan happens and the geophysicalness happens leads to that the inclementness does not occur. sent4: that both the ostomy and the impacting pygmy happens is false. sent5: if the improperness does not occur then the penetrableness but not the burglary occurs. sent6: if the geophysicalness does not occur then that the greenhouseness and the worthiness occurs is not true. sent7: that the outerness and the bloomer occurs does not hold. sent8: that the outerness does not occur is prevented by that the rutting does not occur and the anastomoticness does not occur. sent9: that the emanating does not occur is prevented by that not the masonry but the rounders occurs. sent10: that the romanticness happens and the inclementness does not occur is wrong if the outerness happens. sent11: that the propagativeness and the likeness happens is wrong. sent12: the rutting does not occur and the anastomoticness occurs. sent13: both the geophysicalness and the bloomer happens if the run does not occur. sent14: the diocesanness happens if not the bloomer but the estrogenicness happens. sent15: if the diocesanness does not occur then the fact that the non-greenhouseness and the non-estrogenicness happens does not hold. sent16: the anastomoticness happens. sent17: the romantic does not occur. sent18: that if that the greenhouse does not occur and the estrogenicness does not occur is not true the greenhouse happens hold. sent19: the bloomer does not occur if that the outerness happens and the bloomer happens is wrong. sent20: if the monetization happens the estrogenicness happens. sent21: if the fact that the rutting does not occur is not false the romanticness does not occur. sent22: the monetization occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent22 -> int1: that the estrogenicness happens is correct.; sent19 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the bloomer does not occur is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bloomer does not occur but the estrogenicness happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the diocesan happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the geophysicalness happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the diocesanness occurs and the geophysicalness occurs.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the inclementness does not occur.; sent12 -> int7: the rut does not occur.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: both the inclementness and the non-romanticness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the inclementness occurs.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the geophysicalness does not occur.; int11 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__