the dibbling happens.
sent1: the whoring does not occur. sent2: that the insatiateness happens results in that the adverbial and the non-vocalness occurs. sent3: if the whoring does not occur the fiducialness happens and the redeye occurs. sent4: the fiducialness does not occur if either the oceanicness occurs or the Palladianness happens or both. sent5: that the insatiateness and the roofing Lysippus occurs is caused by that the biomedicalness does not occur. sent6: if the fabianness does not occur then the fact that the whoopee occurs and the menstruating excommunication does not occur is false. sent7: that the biomedicalness does not occur and the congregation does not occur results in that the Palladianness occurs. sent8: that the whoring does not occur but the freshet occurs is triggered by that the staying occurs. sent9: the fact that the Palladianness but not the fiducialness happens is not true if the redeye does not occur. sent10: if both the adverbialness and the non-vocalness occurs then the fact that the fabianness does not occur is not wrong. sent11: that not the effacing beetle but the roofing eventuality occurs prevents that the tinning goby does not occur. sent12: the redeye does not occur if not the whoring but the freshet occurs. sent13: that the archaeologicalness does not occur and the villainy does not occur prevents that the staying does not occur. sent14: if the whoring does not occur and the redeye does not occur then the dibbling occurs. sent15: not the villainy but the catechism happens if the tinning goby happens. sent16: if the fact that the biomedicalness does not occur and the congregation does not occur is not correct then the dibbling does not occur. sent17: the archaeologicalness does not occur if the fact that the whoopee occurs but the menstruating excommunication does not occur is wrong. sent18: the biomedicalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biomedicalness does not occur and the congregation does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Palladianness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the oceanicness happens or the Palladianness occurs or both.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fiducialness does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: the fiducialness and the redeye occurs.; int4 -> int5: the fiducialness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the biomedicalness does not occur and the congregation does not occur is not right.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the soak and/or the tinning Honduran occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the dibbling happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the whoring does not occur. sent2: that the insatiateness happens results in that the adverbial and the non-vocalness occurs. sent3: if the whoring does not occur the fiducialness happens and the redeye occurs. sent4: the fiducialness does not occur if either the oceanicness occurs or the Palladianness happens or both. sent5: that the insatiateness and the roofing Lysippus occurs is caused by that the biomedicalness does not occur. sent6: if the fabianness does not occur then the fact that the whoopee occurs and the menstruating excommunication does not occur is false. sent7: that the biomedicalness does not occur and the congregation does not occur results in that the Palladianness occurs. sent8: that the whoring does not occur but the freshet occurs is triggered by that the staying occurs. sent9: the fact that the Palladianness but not the fiducialness happens is not true if the redeye does not occur. sent10: if both the adverbialness and the non-vocalness occurs then the fact that the fabianness does not occur is not wrong. sent11: that not the effacing beetle but the roofing eventuality occurs prevents that the tinning goby does not occur. sent12: the redeye does not occur if not the whoring but the freshet occurs. sent13: that the archaeologicalness does not occur and the villainy does not occur prevents that the staying does not occur. sent14: if the whoring does not occur and the redeye does not occur then the dibbling occurs. sent15: not the villainy but the catechism happens if the tinning goby happens. sent16: if the fact that the biomedicalness does not occur and the congregation does not occur is not correct then the dibbling does not occur. sent17: the archaeologicalness does not occur if the fact that the whoopee occurs but the menstruating excommunication does not occur is wrong. sent18: the biomedicalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biomedicalness does not occur and the congregation does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Palladianness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the oceanicness happens or the Palladianness occurs or both.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fiducialness does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: the fiducialness and the redeye occurs.; int4 -> int5: the fiducialness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the biomedicalness does not occur and the congregation does not occur is not right.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__