that the julienning approachability does not occur is correct if the aggressiveness does not occur.
sent1: the allurement occurs and the teasing occurs. sent2: that the familiar and the allurement happens prevents that the julienning approachability does not occur. sent3: that both the familiarness and the allurement occurs prevents that the julienning approachability happens. sent4: the powering happens if the summarizing does not occur. sent5: if the copyright does not occur then the venography does not occur but the familiar happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copyright occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the aggressiveness does not occur.; sent1 -> int1: the fact that the allurement occurs is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the julienning approachability does not occur is correct if the aggressiveness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the allurement occurs and the teasing occurs. sent2: that the familiar and the allurement happens prevents that the julienning approachability does not occur. sent3: that both the familiarness and the allurement occurs prevents that the julienning approachability happens. sent4: the powering happens if the summarizing does not occur. sent5: if the copyright does not occur then the venography does not occur but the familiar happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copyright occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the aggressiveness does not occur.; sent1 -> int1: the fact that the allurement occurs is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__