the pseudoephedrine is bipedal.
sent1: if the fact that something does not personify Laniidae and it is not a kind of a flounce is incorrect then it is entrepreneurial. sent2: the sensitization is not perceptive. sent3: if that the estrone is not a chimneystack and does not personify heterosexism is not right then the pseudoephedrine is bipedal. sent4: the seismograph is not a flounce if the ruddle is both a orthopteron and not phreatic. sent5: the estrone is not a euphuism if that the ruddle is a orthopteron and is not phreatic does not hold. sent6: if something is not a euphuism then the fact that it is not a chimneystack and does not personify heterosexism is false. sent7: if the fact that the sensitization is not perceptive is true the boathouse interlocks Nernst and is not a cloudiness. sent8: if the seismograph is not a flounce that the boathouse does not personify Laniidae and is not a flounce does not hold. sent9: if something does interlock Nernst but it is not a kind of a cloudiness it is not entrepreneurial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ruddle is a orthopteron that is not phreatic.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the seismograph does not flounce.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the boathouse does not personify Laniidae and it is not a kind of a flounce is not right.; sent1 -> int3: the boathouse is entrepreneurial if that it does not personify Laniidae and does not flounce is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the boathouse is entrepreneurial.; sent9 -> int5: if the boathouse interlocks Nernst but it is not a cloudiness it is not entrepreneurial.; sent7 & sent2 -> int6: the boathouse does interlock Nernst and is not a cloudiness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the boathouse is not entrepreneurial.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the ruddle is a orthopteron but not phreatic is not correct.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the estrone is not a kind of a euphuism.; sent6 -> int11: if the estrone is not a euphuism the fact that it is not a chimneystack and it does not personify heterosexism does not hold.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the estrone is not a chimneystack and it does not personify heterosexism is not correct.; int12 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pseudoephedrine is bipedal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not personify Laniidae and it is not a kind of a flounce is incorrect then it is entrepreneurial. sent2: the sensitization is not perceptive. sent3: if that the estrone is not a chimneystack and does not personify heterosexism is not right then the pseudoephedrine is bipedal. sent4: the seismograph is not a flounce if the ruddle is both a orthopteron and not phreatic. sent5: the estrone is not a euphuism if that the ruddle is a orthopteron and is not phreatic does not hold. sent6: if something is not a euphuism then the fact that it is not a chimneystack and does not personify heterosexism is false. sent7: if the fact that the sensitization is not perceptive is true the boathouse interlocks Nernst and is not a cloudiness. sent8: if the seismograph is not a flounce that the boathouse does not personify Laniidae and is not a flounce does not hold. sent9: if something does interlock Nernst but it is not a kind of a cloudiness it is not entrepreneurial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ruddle is a orthopteron that is not phreatic.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the seismograph does not flounce.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the boathouse does not personify Laniidae and it is not a kind of a flounce is not right.; sent1 -> int3: the boathouse is entrepreneurial if that it does not personify Laniidae and does not flounce is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the boathouse is entrepreneurial.; sent9 -> int5: if the boathouse interlocks Nernst but it is not a cloudiness it is not entrepreneurial.; sent7 & sent2 -> int6: the boathouse does interlock Nernst and is not a cloudiness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the boathouse is not entrepreneurial.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the ruddle is a orthopteron but not phreatic is not correct.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the estrone is not a kind of a euphuism.; sent6 -> int11: if the estrone is not a euphuism the fact that it is not a chimneystack and it does not personify heterosexism does not hold.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the estrone is not a chimneystack and it does not personify heterosexism is not correct.; int12 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__