there is something such that if the fact that it is vasomotor and/or is not a kind of an egress is incorrect then it is low-resolution.
sent1: if either the schlockmeister is vasomotor or it is not an egress or both it is low-resolution. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a one-seventh and/or is not an egress is false then it is a nicad. sent3: the schlockmeister is a Larousse if the fact that it is thermionics and/or it is not a kind of an egress is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the schlockmeister is a hotspot and/or it is not adscript is wrong then it is vasomotor. sent5: there is something such that if it is vasomotor or is not an egress or both then it is low-resolution. sent6: if the fact that the schlockmeister is vasomotor and/or is an egress is not correct it is low-resolution. sent7: the schlockmeister is vasomotor if that it either is a incaution or is not an understatement or both is false. sent8: if that the schlockmeister is forcipate or it is not forgetful or both is not correct it is a kind of an egress. sent9: there is something such that if that it either is cardiac or does not negotiate insecticide or both does not hold then it is taxonomic. sent10: the fact that the schlockmeister is low-resolution is not false if the fact that it is vasomotor or is not an egress or both does not hold. sent11: the insecticide is Arabian if the fact that it believes endarterectomy and/or does not believe schlockmeister is incorrect. sent12: if the fact that the schlockmeister is a propyl and/or is not a kind of a demoralization is not correct then it is a kind of an egress. sent13: there is something such that if that it is vasomotor or it is an egress or both is incorrect that it is low-resolution is not incorrect. sent14: if that the schlockmeister is a handful and/or not a dissimilarity is not right then it is cytoarchitectural. sent15: if that the schlockmeister is a pentail or it is not low-resolution or both does not hold then it is informative. sent16: if that the schlockmeister is a lambert and/or is not prandial is not correct then that it is distinguishable hold.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that that the slopseller is a one-seventh or not an egress or both is not wrong is not right then it is a nicad.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is vasomotor and/or is not a kind of an egress is incorrect then it is low-resolution. ; $context$ = sent1: if either the schlockmeister is vasomotor or it is not an egress or both it is low-resolution. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of a one-seventh and/or is not an egress is false then it is a nicad. sent3: the schlockmeister is a Larousse if the fact that it is thermionics and/or it is not a kind of an egress is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the schlockmeister is a hotspot and/or it is not adscript is wrong then it is vasomotor. sent5: there is something such that if it is vasomotor or is not an egress or both then it is low-resolution. sent6: if the fact that the schlockmeister is vasomotor and/or is an egress is not correct it is low-resolution. sent7: the schlockmeister is vasomotor if that it either is a incaution or is not an understatement or both is false. sent8: if that the schlockmeister is forcipate or it is not forgetful or both is not correct it is a kind of an egress. sent9: there is something such that if that it either is cardiac or does not negotiate insecticide or both does not hold then it is taxonomic. sent10: the fact that the schlockmeister is low-resolution is not false if the fact that it is vasomotor or is not an egress or both does not hold. sent11: the insecticide is Arabian if the fact that it believes endarterectomy and/or does not believe schlockmeister is incorrect. sent12: if the fact that the schlockmeister is a propyl and/or is not a kind of a demoralization is not correct then it is a kind of an egress. sent13: there is something such that if that it is vasomotor or it is an egress or both is incorrect that it is low-resolution is not incorrect. sent14: if that the schlockmeister is a handful and/or not a dissimilarity is not right then it is cytoarchitectural. sent15: if that the schlockmeister is a pentail or it is not low-resolution or both does not hold then it is informative. sent16: if that the schlockmeister is a lambert and/or is not prandial is not correct then that it is distinguishable hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__