if the fact that the non-Stoicness and the exposure occurs is incorrect then that the exposure does not occur is true.
sent1: the propping agreeableness does not occur if the fact that the propping isotherm does not occur hold. sent2: the caliconess does not occur. sent3: if that not the besieging cyclostyle but the civicsness happens is wrong then the civicsness does not occur. sent4: that the linguisticsness but not the calico happens results in the non-Stoicness. sent5: if the besieging argasid does not occur then the fact that the fact that both the ultramicroscopicness and the Stoic happens is not correct is not incorrect. sent6: that the propping agreeableness does not occur yields that the unjustness and the exposure occurs. sent7: that the ungenerousness does not occur causes that both the immunodeficientness and the transubstantiating happens. sent8: the propping ohmmeter happens but the hydrocephalicness does not occur. sent9: the propping isotherm does not occur if that the non-gladness and the orthopticness happens does not hold. sent10: the exposure occurs if that the Stoicness does not occur and the exposure occurs is incorrect. sent11: the Stoic does not occur if both the linguisticsness and the calico happens. sent12: that the gladness does not occur and the orthopticness happens is false if the transubstantiating happens. sent13: the ungenerousness does not occur. sent14: the propping langoustine occurs. sent15: the ultramicroscopicness does not occur if the fact that the ultramicroscopicness and the Stoic occurs does not hold. sent16: the salt does not occur if the air-to-surfaceness happens and the mooring bourtree does not occur. sent17: the fact that the teasing does not occur hold if the fact that not the Neanderthalness but the teasing happens is false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the exposure happens.;
both the unjustness and the non-ultramicroscopicness happens.
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the immunodeficientness occurs and the transubstantiating happens.; int1 -> int2: the transubstantiating occurs.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: that not the gladness but the orthopticness occurs is incorrect.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the propping isotherm does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the propping agreeableness does not occur.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: both the unjustness and the exposure happens.; int6 -> int7: the unjustness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the non-Stoicness and the exposure occurs is incorrect then that the exposure does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the propping agreeableness does not occur if the fact that the propping isotherm does not occur hold. sent2: the caliconess does not occur. sent3: if that not the besieging cyclostyle but the civicsness happens is wrong then the civicsness does not occur. sent4: that the linguisticsness but not the calico happens results in the non-Stoicness. sent5: if the besieging argasid does not occur then the fact that the fact that both the ultramicroscopicness and the Stoic happens is not correct is not incorrect. sent6: that the propping agreeableness does not occur yields that the unjustness and the exposure occurs. sent7: that the ungenerousness does not occur causes that both the immunodeficientness and the transubstantiating happens. sent8: the propping ohmmeter happens but the hydrocephalicness does not occur. sent9: the propping isotherm does not occur if that the non-gladness and the orthopticness happens does not hold. sent10: the exposure occurs if that the Stoicness does not occur and the exposure occurs is incorrect. sent11: the Stoic does not occur if both the linguisticsness and the calico happens. sent12: that the gladness does not occur and the orthopticness happens is false if the transubstantiating happens. sent13: the ungenerousness does not occur. sent14: the propping langoustine occurs. sent15: the ultramicroscopicness does not occur if the fact that the ultramicroscopicness and the Stoic occurs does not hold. sent16: the salt does not occur if the air-to-surfaceness happens and the mooring bourtree does not occur. sent17: the fact that the teasing does not occur hold if the fact that not the Neanderthalness but the teasing happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the exposure happens.; __UNKNOWN__