the trouser dabs Tanguy but it is not low-level.
sent1: the smoothie does not prepare smoothie. sent2: the fact that the trouser is a tapioca but it is not a kind of a Praetorian is true if the agitator prepares smoothie. sent3: the trouser is a tapioca if that the agitator is a tapioca is not wrong. sent4: something dabs Tanguy and/or it is not a kind of a tapioca. sent5: there is something such that it is a tapioca and does prepare smoothie. sent6: if the provincial prepares smoothie then that the screwdriver prepares smoothie or does not dab earlobe or both is incorrect. sent7: that the fact that something does dab Tanguy but it is not low-level is wrong if it does not erupt is not wrong. sent8: the earlobe is new thing that is non-semiautobiographical. sent9: if the screwdriver is not a kind of a tapioca that it is a kind of a Praetorian and it is not new is incorrect. sent10: the windfall erupts. sent11: the trouser does dab bunion if that either the agitator is new or it does not dab Tanguy or both is wrong. sent12: the screwdriver is not a tapioca if there is something such that either it dabs Tanguy or it is not a kind of a tapioca or both. sent13: if there are non-Praetorian things then that the provincial does prepare smoothie and does dab earlobe is not right. sent14: the earlobe is a Praetorian. sent15: the trouser is a Praetorian if the fact that the screwdriver does prepare smoothie and/or does not dab earlobe is not correct. sent16: something does not dab outreach and it is not conjunct. sent17: if something is a Praetorian and it is a kind of a tapioca then it is not new. sent18: something dabs Tanguy and is not low-level if it is not new. sent19: the earlobe is lunisolar but it is not semiautobiographical if the windfall erupts. sent20: if the provincial is not a key then that it does not uncurl and does not dab bunion is not true. sent21: the windfall is arbitrative and does not dab nihil if the earlobe does not erupt. sent22: the provincial prepares smoothie if something that is not non-lunisolar is not semiautobiographical. sent23: if there exists something such that that it does not uncurl and it does not dab bunion is false the earlobe does dab bunion. sent24: if something that does not dab outreach is not conjunct the provincial is not a key. sent25: if something does dab bunion then the fact that it is non-new and it is not a kind of a tapioca does not hold. sent26: the fact that the trouser does not erupt is not incorrect if the windfall does prepare smoothie and does not dab earlobe. sent27: the agitator is a tapioca and it dabs bunion.
sent19 & sent10 -> int1: the earlobe is both lunisolar and not semiautobiographical.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is lunisolar and it is not semiautobiographical.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the provincial does prepare smoothie.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the screwdriver does prepare smoothie and/or it does not dab earlobe is false.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the trouser is a Praetorian.; sent27 -> int6: the fact that the agitator is a tapioca hold.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the trouser is a tapioca is true.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the trouser is a Praetorian and a tapioca.; sent17 -> int9: if the trouser is a kind of a Praetorian and is a tapioca it is not new.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the trouser is not new.; sent18 -> int11: if the trouser is not new then it dabs Tanguy and is not low-level.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
something is arbitrative but it does not dab nihil.
sent4 & sent12 -> int12: the screwdriver is not a tapioca.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the screwdriver is Praetorian and non-new does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the trouser dabs Tanguy but it is not low-level. ; $context$ = sent1: the smoothie does not prepare smoothie. sent2: the fact that the trouser is a tapioca but it is not a kind of a Praetorian is true if the agitator prepares smoothie. sent3: the trouser is a tapioca if that the agitator is a tapioca is not wrong. sent4: something dabs Tanguy and/or it is not a kind of a tapioca. sent5: there is something such that it is a tapioca and does prepare smoothie. sent6: if the provincial prepares smoothie then that the screwdriver prepares smoothie or does not dab earlobe or both is incorrect. sent7: that the fact that something does dab Tanguy but it is not low-level is wrong if it does not erupt is not wrong. sent8: the earlobe is new thing that is non-semiautobiographical. sent9: if the screwdriver is not a kind of a tapioca that it is a kind of a Praetorian and it is not new is incorrect. sent10: the windfall erupts. sent11: the trouser does dab bunion if that either the agitator is new or it does not dab Tanguy or both is wrong. sent12: the screwdriver is not a tapioca if there is something such that either it dabs Tanguy or it is not a kind of a tapioca or both. sent13: if there are non-Praetorian things then that the provincial does prepare smoothie and does dab earlobe is not right. sent14: the earlobe is a Praetorian. sent15: the trouser is a Praetorian if the fact that the screwdriver does prepare smoothie and/or does not dab earlobe is not correct. sent16: something does not dab outreach and it is not conjunct. sent17: if something is a Praetorian and it is a kind of a tapioca then it is not new. sent18: something dabs Tanguy and is not low-level if it is not new. sent19: the earlobe is lunisolar but it is not semiautobiographical if the windfall erupts. sent20: if the provincial is not a key then that it does not uncurl and does not dab bunion is not true. sent21: the windfall is arbitrative and does not dab nihil if the earlobe does not erupt. sent22: the provincial prepares smoothie if something that is not non-lunisolar is not semiautobiographical. sent23: if there exists something such that that it does not uncurl and it does not dab bunion is false the earlobe does dab bunion. sent24: if something that does not dab outreach is not conjunct the provincial is not a key. sent25: if something does dab bunion then the fact that it is non-new and it is not a kind of a tapioca does not hold. sent26: the fact that the trouser does not erupt is not incorrect if the windfall does prepare smoothie and does not dab earlobe. sent27: the agitator is a tapioca and it dabs bunion. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent10 -> int1: the earlobe is both lunisolar and not semiautobiographical.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is lunisolar and it is not semiautobiographical.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the provincial does prepare smoothie.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the screwdriver does prepare smoothie and/or it does not dab earlobe is false.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the trouser is a Praetorian.; sent27 -> int6: the fact that the agitator is a tapioca hold.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the trouser is a tapioca is true.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the trouser is a Praetorian and a tapioca.; sent17 -> int9: if the trouser is a kind of a Praetorian and is a tapioca it is not new.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the trouser is not new.; sent18 -> int11: if the trouser is not new then it dabs Tanguy and is not low-level.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__