the telefilm is not happy.
sent1: the freak is not a kind of a microscope. sent2: there is something such that it is a kind of non-inheritable thing that is a microscope. sent3: if there is something such that it is not electoral then the telefilm does not lap. sent4: if that something is both not a microscope and not happy is false it is not happy. sent5: if that the telefilm is not a lap hold it is a kind of plain thing that does not permit Romansh. sent6: there is something such that it is not a deification. sent7: if something that is not inheritable is not a kind of a microscope then the locksmith stigmatizes hartebeest. sent8: if the freak is not undescriptive the fact that the trimer is not a microscope but it is inheritable is wrong. sent9: something is not a tam if it is plain and it does not permit Romansh. sent10: if the telefilm is not a tam the fact that the locksmith is pyrrhic and it stigmatizes saltcellar hold. sent11: something is inheritable if it does stigmatize hartebeest. sent12: something is not happy if it is undescriptive. sent13: that the ash does not snicker and it is not a vaginismus does not hold. sent14: that something is not electoral hold. sent15: the telefilm is inheritable if something is not a microscope and not undescriptive. sent16: there are non-sarcosomal and non-courteous things. sent17: the freak is not a pyrrhic if it is not a pyrrhic and/or is not a vaginismus. sent18: if the freak is not a pyrrhic then the telefilm does stigmatize hartebeest and is undescriptive. sent19: the telefilm stigmatizes hartebeest but it is not a kind of a microscope if the freak is undescriptive. sent20: something that is not a vaginismus is undescriptive thing that is happy. sent21: the freak is not undescriptive if the locksmith is both not undescriptive and pyrrhic. sent22: if the locksmith does stigmatize hartebeest then the telefilm is undescriptive. sent23: there exists something such that it is inheritable and it is not a microscope. sent24: the ageratum is not a microscope.
sent12 -> int1: the telefilm is not happy if it is undescriptive.;
the trimer does stigmatize hartebeest.
sent20 -> int2: the locksmith is undescriptive and is happy if it is not a vaginismus.; sent9 -> int3: if the telefilm is a plain and does not permit Romansh then it is not a kind of a tam.; sent14 & sent3 -> int4: the telefilm does not lap.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the telefilm is a plain but it does not permit Romansh.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the telefilm is not a tam.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the locksmith is pyrrhic thing that stigmatizes saltcellar.; int7 -> int8: the locksmith is a pyrrhic.;
$hypothesis$ = the telefilm is not happy. ; $context$ = sent1: the freak is not a kind of a microscope. sent2: there is something such that it is a kind of non-inheritable thing that is a microscope. sent3: if there is something such that it is not electoral then the telefilm does not lap. sent4: if that something is both not a microscope and not happy is false it is not happy. sent5: if that the telefilm is not a lap hold it is a kind of plain thing that does not permit Romansh. sent6: there is something such that it is not a deification. sent7: if something that is not inheritable is not a kind of a microscope then the locksmith stigmatizes hartebeest. sent8: if the freak is not undescriptive the fact that the trimer is not a microscope but it is inheritable is wrong. sent9: something is not a tam if it is plain and it does not permit Romansh. sent10: if the telefilm is not a tam the fact that the locksmith is pyrrhic and it stigmatizes saltcellar hold. sent11: something is inheritable if it does stigmatize hartebeest. sent12: something is not happy if it is undescriptive. sent13: that the ash does not snicker and it is not a vaginismus does not hold. sent14: that something is not electoral hold. sent15: the telefilm is inheritable if something is not a microscope and not undescriptive. sent16: there are non-sarcosomal and non-courteous things. sent17: the freak is not a pyrrhic if it is not a pyrrhic and/or is not a vaginismus. sent18: if the freak is not a pyrrhic then the telefilm does stigmatize hartebeest and is undescriptive. sent19: the telefilm stigmatizes hartebeest but it is not a kind of a microscope if the freak is undescriptive. sent20: something that is not a vaginismus is undescriptive thing that is happy. sent21: the freak is not undescriptive if the locksmith is both not undescriptive and pyrrhic. sent22: if the locksmith does stigmatize hartebeest then the telefilm is undescriptive. sent23: there exists something such that it is inheritable and it is not a microscope. sent24: the ageratum is not a microscope. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the telefilm is not happy if it is undescriptive.; __UNKNOWN__