the fact that something is a painter and/or it is not purposeless is wrong.
sent1: the gloxinia is a painter and/or it does not labor Nielsen if it is ossiferous. sent2: the spadefish is a painter or it is purposeless or both if it is ossiferous. sent3: if the spadefish is not ossiferous the gloxinia labors Nielsen. sent4: the gloxinia does not labor Nielsen if that it is not a girlhood and does labor Nielsen is not correct. sent5: if something is ossiferous then it is a painter or is purposeless or both. sent6: the fact that the spadefish does not labor Nielsen is not false if the fact that that it is not a painter and does labor Nielsen hold is not correct. sent7: the fact that the gloxinia is not a girlhood but it does labor Nielsen is not right. sent8: the spadefish either is ossiferous or is not a girlhood or both. sent9: something is a painter or is not purposeless or both if it is ossiferous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spadefish is not ossiferous.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the gloxinia does labor Nielsen.; sent4 & sent7 -> int2: that the gloxinia does not labor Nielsen is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the spadefish is ossiferous.; sent9 -> int5: if the spadefish is ossiferous it is a painter and/or not purposeless.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the spadefish is a painter or it is not purposeless or both.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is a painter and/or it is not purposeless is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the gloxinia is a painter and/or it does not labor Nielsen if it is ossiferous. sent2: the spadefish is a painter or it is purposeless or both if it is ossiferous. sent3: if the spadefish is not ossiferous the gloxinia labors Nielsen. sent4: the gloxinia does not labor Nielsen if that it is not a girlhood and does labor Nielsen is not correct. sent5: if something is ossiferous then it is a painter or is purposeless or both. sent6: the fact that the spadefish does not labor Nielsen is not false if the fact that that it is not a painter and does labor Nielsen hold is not correct. sent7: the fact that the gloxinia is not a girlhood but it does labor Nielsen is not right. sent8: the spadefish either is ossiferous or is not a girlhood or both. sent9: something is a painter or is not purposeless or both if it is ossiferous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spadefish is not ossiferous.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the gloxinia does labor Nielsen.; sent4 & sent7 -> int2: that the gloxinia does not labor Nielsen is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the spadefish is ossiferous.; sent9 -> int5: if the spadefish is ossiferous it is a painter and/or not purposeless.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the spadefish is a painter or it is not purposeless or both.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__