that if the turnbuckle is not a kind of the folder then the turnbuckle is not amalgamative is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that something is not amalgamative and it is not desirous does not hold if it is not a guard. sent2: the fact that the guardsman does not guard and does not debar guardsman is not true. sent3: something is not a kind of a guard if it is a folder and it is non-sedimentary. sent4: the fact that the fact that the theophylline untunes contestant but it is not a hypallage does not hold if the vetch is not chimeric is true. sent5: the fact that the turnbuckle is not a guard and it is not desirous is not correct if it does desecrate trumpeter. sent6: if that the turnbuckle does not desecrate retrospective is not wrong then the pyrogallol is a kind of a folder and is not sedimentary. sent7: the turnbuckle desecrates trumpeter and is not unapproachable if it is amalgamative. sent8: that the turnbuckle does not guard and is desirous is not right. sent9: the fact that if the fact that the turnbuckle is not a kind of the guard and it is not desirous is not true the turnbuckle is a folder hold. sent10: if that the theophylline does untune contestant and is not a hypallage is not right the turnbuckle does not desecrate retrospective.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the turnbuckle is amalgamative.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: that the turnbuckle desecrates trumpeter and is not unapproachable is right.; int1 -> int2: the turnbuckle does desecrate trumpeter.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the turnbuckle is both not a guard and not desirous is not true.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the turnbuckle is a folder.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the turnbuckle is not a folder is true.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the turnbuckle is not amalgamative.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the pyrogallol does not desecrate trumpeter.
sent1 -> int7: the fact that the pyrogallol is not amalgamative and it is not desirous is not true if the fact that it is not a guard is not wrong.; sent3 -> int8: if the pyrogallol is a folder and is not sedimentary it is not a guard.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the turnbuckle is not a kind of the folder then the turnbuckle is not amalgamative is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not amalgamative and it is not desirous does not hold if it is not a guard. sent2: the fact that the guardsman does not guard and does not debar guardsman is not true. sent3: something is not a kind of a guard if it is a folder and it is non-sedimentary. sent4: the fact that the fact that the theophylline untunes contestant but it is not a hypallage does not hold if the vetch is not chimeric is true. sent5: the fact that the turnbuckle is not a guard and it is not desirous is not correct if it does desecrate trumpeter. sent6: if that the turnbuckle does not desecrate retrospective is not wrong then the pyrogallol is a kind of a folder and is not sedimentary. sent7: the turnbuckle desecrates trumpeter and is not unapproachable if it is amalgamative. sent8: that the turnbuckle does not guard and is desirous is not right. sent9: the fact that if the fact that the turnbuckle is not a kind of the guard and it is not desirous is not true the turnbuckle is a folder hold. sent10: if that the theophylline does untune contestant and is not a hypallage is not right the turnbuckle does not desecrate retrospective. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the turnbuckle is amalgamative.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: that the turnbuckle desecrates trumpeter and is not unapproachable is right.; int1 -> int2: the turnbuckle does desecrate trumpeter.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the turnbuckle is both not a guard and not desirous is not true.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the turnbuckle is a folder.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the turnbuckle is not a folder is true.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the turnbuckle is not amalgamative.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__