the bullnose does not tighten.
sent1: that the cyclamen hardens effleurage is right. sent2: if that the crenel is heedful but it is not allopathic does not hold the bullnose does tighten. sent3: if the tracery is a tutorial then the fact that the crenel is heedful and it is allopathic does not hold. sent4: the fact that if the cyclamen is not allopathic the tee does harden effleurage and it is tutorial is not incorrect. sent5: the tracery is a tutorial if the cyclamen hardens effleurage. sent6: if the tracery is tutorial that the crenel is heedful but it is not allopathic is not correct. sent7: the cyclamen tightens. sent8: if something does harden effleurage but it is not tutorial then it does not tighten. sent9: if that the tracery is heedful and is not a kind of a tutorial is false the crenel tightens. sent10: That the effleurage hardens cyclamen is right. sent11: the crenel is heedful if the fact that the tracery is both tutorial and non-allopathic is not true. sent12: the fact that the tracery is not non-tutorial but allopathic is not correct.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the tracery is a tutorial.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: that the crenel is heedful but not allopathic is not true.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the bullnose does not tighten.
sent8 -> int3: the bullnose does not tighten if it hardens effleurage and it is not tutorial.;
$hypothesis$ = the bullnose does not tighten. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cyclamen hardens effleurage is right. sent2: if that the crenel is heedful but it is not allopathic does not hold the bullnose does tighten. sent3: if the tracery is a tutorial then the fact that the crenel is heedful and it is allopathic does not hold. sent4: the fact that if the cyclamen is not allopathic the tee does harden effleurage and it is tutorial is not incorrect. sent5: the tracery is a tutorial if the cyclamen hardens effleurage. sent6: if the tracery is tutorial that the crenel is heedful but it is not allopathic is not correct. sent7: the cyclamen tightens. sent8: if something does harden effleurage but it is not tutorial then it does not tighten. sent9: if that the tracery is heedful and is not a kind of a tutorial is false the crenel tightens. sent10: That the effleurage hardens cyclamen is right. sent11: the crenel is heedful if the fact that the tracery is both tutorial and non-allopathic is not true. sent12: the fact that the tracery is not non-tutorial but allopathic is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the tracery is a tutorial.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: that the crenel is heedful but not allopathic is not true.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__