the fact that the slit is a pothook but it does not mangle one-ten-thousandth is incorrect.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is either not Jewish or a Seleucus or both does not hold the slit is not ohmic. sent2: the polyethylene is not ohmic if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it either is not Jewish or is a kind of a pothook or both is not wrong is not correct. sent3: something is Jewish. sent4: the centrifugation is a pharmaceutical and it is a kind of a side if it is not onside. sent5: there is something such that it is not Jewish and/or it is a Seleucus. sent6: the fact that the slit is not a pothook or it is Jewish or both is false. sent7: the fact that something is a pothook but it does not mangle one-ten-thousandth is incorrect if it is not ohmic. sent8: the polyethylene is not non-Jewish. sent9: the fact that the centrifugation is a kind of non-calisthenic thing that is not ohmic is incorrect if it is a kind of a pharmaceutical. sent10: the centrifugation is not onside. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Seleucus. sent12: the slit does not mangle one-ten-thousandth if the sphere does not mangle one-ten-thousandth and it is not calisthenic. sent13: something is a kind of a venture and it is a kind of a lockout if it is not a rowan. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is not calisthenic and it is not ohmic is not true the slit is a kind of a pothook. sent15: there is something such that that it is Jewish and/or a Seleucus is not true. sent16: if the sphere does venture then the slit does not mangle one-ten-thousandth.
sent7 -> int1: if the slit is not ohmic that it is a pothook and it does not mangle one-ten-thousandth does not hold.;
the polyethylene is non-ohmic.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the slit is a pothook but it does not mangle one-ten-thousandth is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is either not Jewish or a Seleucus or both does not hold the slit is not ohmic. sent2: the polyethylene is not ohmic if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it either is not Jewish or is a kind of a pothook or both is not wrong is not correct. sent3: something is Jewish. sent4: the centrifugation is a pharmaceutical and it is a kind of a side if it is not onside. sent5: there is something such that it is not Jewish and/or it is a Seleucus. sent6: the fact that the slit is not a pothook or it is Jewish or both is false. sent7: the fact that something is a pothook but it does not mangle one-ten-thousandth is incorrect if it is not ohmic. sent8: the polyethylene is not non-Jewish. sent9: the fact that the centrifugation is a kind of non-calisthenic thing that is not ohmic is incorrect if it is a kind of a pharmaceutical. sent10: the centrifugation is not onside. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Seleucus. sent12: the slit does not mangle one-ten-thousandth if the sphere does not mangle one-ten-thousandth and it is not calisthenic. sent13: something is a kind of a venture and it is a kind of a lockout if it is not a rowan. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is not calisthenic and it is not ohmic is not true the slit is a kind of a pothook. sent15: there is something such that that it is Jewish and/or a Seleucus is not true. sent16: if the sphere does venture then the slit does not mangle one-ten-thousandth. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the slit is not ohmic that it is a pothook and it does not mangle one-ten-thousandth does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__