the fact that the signer is non-tuberculate thing that is not a heliotherapy is wrong.
sent1: if something is a kind of a populism then the fact that it is both not tuberculate and not a heliotherapy does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not tangential hold. sent3: the fact that the terminal is not a sapremia and does not clone runaway is not right if something is not tangential. sent4: that the terminal is not a sapremia and clones runaway is wrong. sent5: the terminal is a kind of a waxing if that it is not a sapremia and it does not clone runaway is not true. sent6: the signer is not a rounding but a saddlebag if the hygrodeik rounding. sent7: if the signer does not round it is a populism. sent8: if the signer is a waxing then that the terminal is not a sapremia and is not a rounding does not hold. sent9: that if the terminal clones runaway then the fact that the terminal does wax is correct is not wrong. sent10: the hygrodeik is a kind of a rounding if that the hauler is both not Episcopal and not a peregrination is incorrect.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: that the terminal is not a sapremia and does not clone runaway is false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the terminal does wax is correct.; sent1 -> int3: if the signer is a kind of a populism then that it is not tuberculate and it is not a heliotherapy is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the signer is non-tuberculate thing that is not a heliotherapy is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a populism then the fact that it is both not tuberculate and not a heliotherapy does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not tangential hold. sent3: the fact that the terminal is not a sapremia and does not clone runaway is not right if something is not tangential. sent4: that the terminal is not a sapremia and clones runaway is wrong. sent5: the terminal is a kind of a waxing if that it is not a sapremia and it does not clone runaway is not true. sent6: the signer is not a rounding but a saddlebag if the hygrodeik rounding. sent7: if the signer does not round it is a populism. sent8: if the signer is a waxing then that the terminal is not a sapremia and is not a rounding does not hold. sent9: that if the terminal clones runaway then the fact that the terminal does wax is correct is not wrong. sent10: the hygrodeik is a kind of a rounding if that the hauler is both not Episcopal and not a peregrination is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: that the terminal is not a sapremia and does not clone runaway is false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the terminal does wax is correct.; sent1 -> int3: if the signer is a kind of a populism then that it is not tuberculate and it is not a heliotherapy is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__