the nonfictionalness occurs.
sent1: if the appellativeness does not occur and the mooing does not occur the lamplight does not occur. sent2: that the non-unpunctualness and the fictionalness happens is caused by that the lamplight does not occur. sent3: the flicking outhouse does not occur. sent4: if the flicking outhouse happens the nonfictionalness happens. sent5: that the simoom happens yields that the flicking clapboard but not the moo occurs. sent6: the nonfictionalness does not occur if the fact that the varnishing downrightness and the non-unpunctualness happens does not hold. sent7: the thalloidness occurs. sent8: that the varnishing downrightness does not occur yields the fictionalness. sent9: the colorfulness does not occur if that the ignoring masjid but not the refuting gallbladder happens is false. sent10: the fact that both the ignoring mistletoe and the non-aerialness occurs does not hold. sent11: the impairing does not occur if the fact that both the indexlessness and the non-murineness occurs is false. sent12: that the flicking outhouse does not occur and the varnishing downrightness does not occur does not hold if the unpunctualness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the parabolicness does not occur is not wrong if that that the flicking eccentricity occurs and the refuting brotherhood does not occur hold is not true. sent14: the appellativeness does not occur and the ignoring transvestite happens if the neoplasticness does not occur. sent15: if the flicking outhouse does not occur then both the thalloidness and the congruousness occurs. sent16: that both the decorousness and the clearedness happens is wrong. sent17: that the thalloidness occurs is brought about by that the flicking outhouse does not occur. sent18: the fact that the impairing happens but the responsibility does not occur is false. sent19: if that the flicking outhouse does not occur and the varnishing downrightness does not occur does not hold the flicking eccentricity does not occur. sent20: the fact that the varnishing downrightness occurs but the unpunctualness does not occur is not true if that the congruousness occurs hold. sent21: the neoplasticness does not occur.
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: the thalloidness and the congruousness happens.; int1 -> int2: the congruousness happens.; sent20 & int2 -> int3: the fact that both the varnishing downrightness and the non-unpunctualness occurs is not correct.; sent6 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the flicking eccentricity does not occur.
sent14 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that not the appellativeness but the ignoring transvestite occurs is correct.; int4 -> int5: the appellativeness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the nonfictionalness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the appellativeness does not occur and the mooing does not occur the lamplight does not occur. sent2: that the non-unpunctualness and the fictionalness happens is caused by that the lamplight does not occur. sent3: the flicking outhouse does not occur. sent4: if the flicking outhouse happens the nonfictionalness happens. sent5: that the simoom happens yields that the flicking clapboard but not the moo occurs. sent6: the nonfictionalness does not occur if the fact that the varnishing downrightness and the non-unpunctualness happens does not hold. sent7: the thalloidness occurs. sent8: that the varnishing downrightness does not occur yields the fictionalness. sent9: the colorfulness does not occur if that the ignoring masjid but not the refuting gallbladder happens is false. sent10: the fact that both the ignoring mistletoe and the non-aerialness occurs does not hold. sent11: the impairing does not occur if the fact that both the indexlessness and the non-murineness occurs is false. sent12: that the flicking outhouse does not occur and the varnishing downrightness does not occur does not hold if the unpunctualness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the parabolicness does not occur is not wrong if that that the flicking eccentricity occurs and the refuting brotherhood does not occur hold is not true. sent14: the appellativeness does not occur and the ignoring transvestite happens if the neoplasticness does not occur. sent15: if the flicking outhouse does not occur then both the thalloidness and the congruousness occurs. sent16: that both the decorousness and the clearedness happens is wrong. sent17: that the thalloidness occurs is brought about by that the flicking outhouse does not occur. sent18: the fact that the impairing happens but the responsibility does not occur is false. sent19: if that the flicking outhouse does not occur and the varnishing downrightness does not occur does not hold the flicking eccentricity does not occur. sent20: the fact that the varnishing downrightness occurs but the unpunctualness does not occur is not true if that the congruousness occurs hold. sent21: the neoplasticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: the thalloidness and the congruousness happens.; int1 -> int2: the congruousness happens.; sent20 & int2 -> int3: the fact that both the varnishing downrightness and the non-unpunctualness occurs is not correct.; sent6 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__