the salp is not dysphemistic.
sent1: the salp is both not a twirler and not amphitropous. sent2: the salp is a kind of a Nahum. sent3: something is a kind of a raggedness if it ventilates predicate. sent4: if the garter is less then that the dulciana is non-illiterate thing that is unsinkable is incorrect. sent5: if something is not a raggedness the fact that it is not a Nahum and it does not ventilate predicate is false. sent6: if something that is not a twirler is not amphitropous it is unconscientious. sent7: the carapace is both not dysphemistic and unconscientious. sent8: the garter is less and is heterocercal. sent9: the salp is not a raggedness if that the Hidatsa is unconscientious but it is not a twirler is incorrect. sent10: the salp ventilates predicate and is a kind of a Nahum. sent11: the salp is not amphitropous. sent12: if the dulciana is amphitropous then the W is a twirler. sent13: if the carapace is not dysphemistic and is unconscientious then it is a Nautilidae. sent14: the archeologist does not premeditate goldstone and it is not a spotlessness. sent15: something is amphitropous if the fact that it is not an illiterate and it is unsinkable is wrong.
sent10 -> int1: the salp does ventilate predicate.; sent3 -> int2: if the salp does ventilate predicate it is a raggedness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the salp is a kind of a raggedness.; sent6 -> int4: the salp is not conscientious if it is not a twirler and it is not amphitropous.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the salp is unconscientious.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the salp is a raggedness and it is unconscientious.;
that the salp is dysphemistic is right.
sent5 -> int7: that the salp is not a Nahum and does not ventilate predicate is not right if it is not a raggedness.; sent15 -> int8: the dulciana is amphitropous if that it is not an illiterate and it is unsinkable is wrong.; sent8 -> int9: the garter is less.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: that the dulciana is not illiterate but it is unsinkable is not correct.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the dulciana is amphitropous.; sent12 & int11 -> int12: the W is a twirler.; int12 -> int13: something is a twirler.;
$hypothesis$ = the salp is not dysphemistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the salp is both not a twirler and not amphitropous. sent2: the salp is a kind of a Nahum. sent3: something is a kind of a raggedness if it ventilates predicate. sent4: if the garter is less then that the dulciana is non-illiterate thing that is unsinkable is incorrect. sent5: if something is not a raggedness the fact that it is not a Nahum and it does not ventilate predicate is false. sent6: if something that is not a twirler is not amphitropous it is unconscientious. sent7: the carapace is both not dysphemistic and unconscientious. sent8: the garter is less and is heterocercal. sent9: the salp is not a raggedness if that the Hidatsa is unconscientious but it is not a twirler is incorrect. sent10: the salp ventilates predicate and is a kind of a Nahum. sent11: the salp is not amphitropous. sent12: if the dulciana is amphitropous then the W is a twirler. sent13: if the carapace is not dysphemistic and is unconscientious then it is a Nautilidae. sent14: the archeologist does not premeditate goldstone and it is not a spotlessness. sent15: something is amphitropous if the fact that it is not an illiterate and it is unsinkable is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the salp does ventilate predicate.; sent3 -> int2: if the salp does ventilate predicate it is a raggedness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the salp is a kind of a raggedness.; sent6 -> int4: the salp is not conscientious if it is not a twirler and it is not amphitropous.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the salp is unconscientious.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the salp is a raggedness and it is unconscientious.; __UNKNOWN__