the mohair is a kind of a shroud.
sent1: that the Skinnerian does not perplex genipap and does not coexist is not right if the brewer stigmatizes paletiology. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a Gilmer the Skinnerian is not a Gilmer and/or it is cenogenetic. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a sogginess and/or is Laputan the semblance does not stigmatize Petaurus. sent4: if there exists something such that it stigmatizes paletiology and does not coexist the uranium is not a gilbert. sent5: if that the mohair is a gilbert and/or it is majors is not true it is not a shroud. sent6: if there is something such that that it does not perplex genipap and it does not coexist is wrong the semblance is not cenogenetic. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a gilbert and it does not shroud is false then the mohair is not a Gilmer. sent8: if the semblance does not stigmatize Petaurus that the Skinnerian does not stigmatize paletiology but it does perplex genipap does not hold. sent9: if the semblance is not cenogenetic that the mahogany is not a Gilmer and does not stigmatize Petaurus does not hold. sent10: if the mahogany is not a gilbert then the fact that the mohair is not a gilbert or is a kind of a majors or both is not right. sent11: something is not a shroud if the fact that it is not a gilbert and/or it is a kind of a majors is wrong. sent12: everything is not a sogginess and/or is Laputan. sent13: if the Skinnerian does not coexist but it shrouds then the mohair is a shrouds. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Gilmer and/or it is cenogenetic it does not coexist. sent15: if that something is not a Gilmer and it does not stigmatize Petaurus does not hold then that it is not a gilbert hold. sent16: everything stigmatizes paletiology. sent17: if there is something such that it is majors and does not shroud the mahogany is not a kind of a Gilmer. sent18: the picornavirus is a majors and is not a kind of a shroud.
sent16 -> int1: the brewer does stigmatize paletiology.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the Skinnerian does not perplex genipap and it does not coexist does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not perplex genipap and does not coexist does not hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the semblance is not cenogenetic.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the mahogany is not a Gilmer and it does not stigmatize Petaurus is not right.; sent15 -> int6: if that the mahogany is not a Gilmer and it does not stigmatize Petaurus is not true then it is not a gilbert.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the mahogany is not a kind of a gilbert.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: that the mohair is not a gilbert or majors or both is not correct.; sent11 -> int9: that if the fact that either the mohair is not a gilbert or it is the majors or both is wrong then the mohair does not shroud is not wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the mohair is a shroud.
$hypothesis$ = the mohair is a kind of a shroud. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Skinnerian does not perplex genipap and does not coexist is not right if the brewer stigmatizes paletiology. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a Gilmer the Skinnerian is not a Gilmer and/or it is cenogenetic. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a sogginess and/or is Laputan the semblance does not stigmatize Petaurus. sent4: if there exists something such that it stigmatizes paletiology and does not coexist the uranium is not a gilbert. sent5: if that the mohair is a gilbert and/or it is majors is not true it is not a shroud. sent6: if there is something such that that it does not perplex genipap and it does not coexist is wrong the semblance is not cenogenetic. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a gilbert and it does not shroud is false then the mohair is not a Gilmer. sent8: if the semblance does not stigmatize Petaurus that the Skinnerian does not stigmatize paletiology but it does perplex genipap does not hold. sent9: if the semblance is not cenogenetic that the mahogany is not a Gilmer and does not stigmatize Petaurus does not hold. sent10: if the mahogany is not a gilbert then the fact that the mohair is not a gilbert or is a kind of a majors or both is not right. sent11: something is not a shroud if the fact that it is not a gilbert and/or it is a kind of a majors is wrong. sent12: everything is not a sogginess and/or is Laputan. sent13: if the Skinnerian does not coexist but it shrouds then the mohair is a shrouds. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Gilmer and/or it is cenogenetic it does not coexist. sent15: if that something is not a Gilmer and it does not stigmatize Petaurus does not hold then that it is not a gilbert hold. sent16: everything stigmatizes paletiology. sent17: if there is something such that it is majors and does not shroud the mahogany is not a kind of a Gilmer. sent18: the picornavirus is a majors and is not a kind of a shroud. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the brewer does stigmatize paletiology.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the Skinnerian does not perplex genipap and it does not coexist does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not perplex genipap and does not coexist does not hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the semblance is not cenogenetic.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the mahogany is not a Gilmer and it does not stigmatize Petaurus is not right.; sent15 -> int6: if that the mahogany is not a Gilmer and it does not stigmatize Petaurus is not true then it is not a gilbert.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the mahogany is not a kind of a gilbert.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: that the mohair is not a gilbert or majors or both is not correct.; sent11 -> int9: that if the fact that either the mohair is not a gilbert or it is the majors or both is wrong then the mohair does not shroud is not wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__