the waterproofing is a dextrin.
sent1: the agora is not unadaptable and/or it is not immeasurable if there exists something such that it is not altitudinal. sent2: the caddis-fly is not unadaptable or does not uphold comprehensiveness or both. sent3: that the striatum is a kind of altitudinal thing that is noncollapsible is false. sent4: if the fact that the striatum is not a kind of a detector or it is not immeasurable or both is incorrect the waterproofing is a dextrin. sent5: the otologist is a detector. sent6: something is not a dextrin if it is a Polycirrus that is not a detector. sent7: if the agora is a detector then it is a Polycirrus. sent8: if the agora is a Polycirrus then the caddis-fly is unadaptable. sent9: if the caddis-fly is not unadaptable and/or it does not uphold comprehensiveness it is not unadaptable. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is altitudinal and it is noncollapsible is not correct the caddis-fly is not altitudinal. sent11: something is a Polycirrus but it is not a detector if it is not unadaptable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agora is a detector.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the agora is a Polycirrus.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the caddis-fly is unadaptable.; sent9 & sent2 -> int3: the caddis-fly is adaptable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the agora is not a detector.;
the waterproofing is not a dextrin.
sent6 -> int6: if the waterproofing is a kind of a Polycirrus that is not a detector then it is not a dextrin.; sent11 -> int7: that the waterproofing is a Polycirrus but it is not a kind of the detector if the fact that the waterproofing is not unadaptable is not wrong hold.; sent3 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is altitudinal and it is noncollapsible is not correct.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the caddis-fly is not altitudinal.; int9 -> int10: there are non-altitudinal things.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the agora is not unadaptable or is non-immeasurable or both.; int11 -> int12: something is not unadaptable or is not immeasurable or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the waterproofing is a dextrin. ; $context$ = sent1: the agora is not unadaptable and/or it is not immeasurable if there exists something such that it is not altitudinal. sent2: the caddis-fly is not unadaptable or does not uphold comprehensiveness or both. sent3: that the striatum is a kind of altitudinal thing that is noncollapsible is false. sent4: if the fact that the striatum is not a kind of a detector or it is not immeasurable or both is incorrect the waterproofing is a dextrin. sent5: the otologist is a detector. sent6: something is not a dextrin if it is a Polycirrus that is not a detector. sent7: if the agora is a detector then it is a Polycirrus. sent8: if the agora is a Polycirrus then the caddis-fly is unadaptable. sent9: if the caddis-fly is not unadaptable and/or it does not uphold comprehensiveness it is not unadaptable. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is altitudinal and it is noncollapsible is not correct the caddis-fly is not altitudinal. sent11: something is a Polycirrus but it is not a detector if it is not unadaptable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agora is a detector.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the agora is a Polycirrus.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the caddis-fly is unadaptable.; sent9 & sent2 -> int3: the caddis-fly is adaptable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the agora is not a detector.; __UNKNOWN__