the fact that there is something such that if it is a Kazan then it is not a Sheridan is wrong.
sent1: the negativist is not a Sheridan if it is nontraditional. sent2: there exists something such that if it does deglaze capful the fact that it is not a summation is not false. sent3: the megalith does not verbify straight if it is a Kazan. sent4: if the megalith bars cable it is not a Sheridan. sent5: if something frays that it is a kind of a Belonidae is not true. sent6: the straight is a kind of a Kazan if it is sensorimotor. sent7: there exists something such that if it is ceramics it does beetle. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a Scranton then it is not acroscopic. sent9: if the megalith is a kind of a Sheridan the fact that it is a resident hold. sent10: the fact that the megalith is not a Sheridan is correct if it does tell. sent11: there is something such that if it is a Kazan that it is a Sheridan is not false. sent12: if the megalith is a Kazan then that it is a Sheridan is true. sent13: if something is a stiff it does not bar countertenor. sent14: there is something such that if it is a sesquipedality it is not umbelliform. sent15: if the megalith is a Kazan then it is not a kind of a Sheridan. sent16: if the megalith does bar then it is a Sheridan. sent17: the megalith is not a wagoner if it does deglaze Vuillard. sent18: if the perishable does bar generic then that it is not impervious is not wrong. sent19: there is something such that if it is nontraditional it is non-Malay. sent20: that there is something such that if it is auxetic then it does not beetle is not wrong. sent21: if the radium does bedew megalith then it is not a model.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is stiff it does not bar countertenor.
sent13 -> int1: if the Oglala is not non-stiff the fact that it does not bar countertenor is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a Kazan then it is not a Sheridan is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the negativist is not a Sheridan if it is nontraditional. sent2: there exists something such that if it does deglaze capful the fact that it is not a summation is not false. sent3: the megalith does not verbify straight if it is a Kazan. sent4: if the megalith bars cable it is not a Sheridan. sent5: if something frays that it is a kind of a Belonidae is not true. sent6: the straight is a kind of a Kazan if it is sensorimotor. sent7: there exists something such that if it is ceramics it does beetle. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a Scranton then it is not acroscopic. sent9: if the megalith is a kind of a Sheridan the fact that it is a resident hold. sent10: the fact that the megalith is not a Sheridan is correct if it does tell. sent11: there is something such that if it is a Kazan that it is a Sheridan is not false. sent12: if the megalith is a Kazan then that it is a Sheridan is true. sent13: if something is a stiff it does not bar countertenor. sent14: there is something such that if it is a sesquipedality it is not umbelliform. sent15: if the megalith is a Kazan then it is not a kind of a Sheridan. sent16: if the megalith does bar then it is a Sheridan. sent17: the megalith is not a wagoner if it does deglaze Vuillard. sent18: if the perishable does bar generic then that it is not impervious is not wrong. sent19: there is something such that if it is nontraditional it is non-Malay. sent20: that there is something such that if it is auxetic then it does not beetle is not wrong. sent21: if the radium does bedew megalith then it is not a model. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__