that the ribbing does not exhale magnifico but it is a Navarino is wrong.
sent1: that the cartographer is not a aminoplast is not false if it is archival. sent2: if that something does not whistle subpopulation and it is not a kind of a Muskogee is incorrect then it does dream despite. sent3: if the Khmer is not sinkable then that the ribbing does not exhale magnifico and is a Navarino is incorrect. sent4: the Khmer does not dream despite or it is not a kind of a bookmobile or both if it does not smite eclat. sent5: if there exists something such that it does dream despite then the candlelight does not smite eclat or it is a bookmobile or both. sent6: if something is not sinkable then that it does smite inactivation and it fringes is incorrect. sent7: the candlelight does whistle subpopulation if the Khmer does not dream despite and/or it is not a kind of a bookmobile. sent8: the fact that either the magnifico is lumbosacral or it does smite laver or both is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the magnifico is lumbosacral and/or it smites laver is not correct then that it is unsinkable is true. sent10: if something whistles angel then it is not a aminoplast. sent11: if that the magnifico smites inactivation and is a fringe is wrong then the Khmer does not smite eclat. sent12: the fact that the ouster does not whistle subpopulation and it is not a Muskogee is wrong if the parrot is not a kilderkin. sent13: the ribbing does not exhale magnifico but it is a Navarino if the parrot does not whistle pedaler. sent14: the cartographer does whistle angel and/or it is archival. sent15: that the mosaic does not whistle pedaler and is not a kilderkin is not true if the fact that something is lumbosacral is right. sent16: if the magnifico is not a kind of a fringe then the Khmer does not smite eclat. sent17: something does smite laver and it is lumbosacral if it is not a kind of a Gibraltarian. sent18: the parrot is not a kilderkin if that that the mosaic does not whistle pedaler and is not a kilderkin hold is wrong. sent19: if the candlelight does whistle subpopulation then the ouster is a kind of a Muskogee but it is not a kilderkin. sent20: the parrot does not whistle pedaler if the ouster is a Muskogee that is not a kilderkin. sent21: if that the cartographer is a Trollope or not Gibraltarian or both is not right the donor is Gibraltarian. sent22: that something is a Trollope or it is non-Gibraltarian or both is not correct if it is not a kind of a aminoplast. sent23: the fact that the ribbing is a kind of a Navarino is not false.
sent6 -> int1: if the magnifico is not sinkable the fact that it does smite inactivation and does fringe is incorrect.; sent9 & sent8 -> int2: the magnifico is not sinkable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the magnifico does smite inactivation and fringes is false.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the Khmer does not smite eclat.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the Khmer does not dream despite and/or it is not a bookmobile.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the candlelight does whistle subpopulation.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the ouster is both a Muskogee and not a kilderkin.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: the parrot does not whistle pedaler.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the ribbing does not exhale magnifico and is a Navarino does not hold.
sent2 -> int9: the ouster dreams despite if that it does not whistle subpopulation and it is not a kind of a Muskogee does not hold.; sent17 -> int10: the donor does smite laver and it is lumbosacral if it is not Gibraltarian.; sent22 -> int11: that the cartographer is a kind of a Trollope and/or it is not a kind of a Gibraltarian does not hold if that it is not a kind of a aminoplast is right.; sent10 -> int12: the cartographer is not a kind of a aminoplast if it does whistle angel.; sent14 & int12 & sent1 -> int13: the cartographer is not a aminoplast.; int11 & int13 -> int14: that the cartographer is either a Trollope or not a Gibraltarian or both does not hold.; sent21 & int14 -> int15: the donor is not a Gibraltarian.; int10 & int15 -> int16: the donor smites laver and is lumbosacral.; int16 -> int17: the donor is lumbosacral.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is lumbosacral.; int18 & sent15 -> int19: that the mosaic does not whistle pedaler and it is not a kilderkin does not hold.; sent18 & int19 -> int20: the parrot is not a kilderkin.; sent12 & int20 -> int21: the fact that the ouster does not whistle subpopulation and is not a kind of a Muskogee is false.; int9 & int21 -> int22: the ouster does dream despite.; int22 -> int23: there exists something such that it dreams despite.; int23 & sent5 -> int24: the candlelight does not smite eclat and/or is a bookmobile.; int24 -> int25: something does not smite eclat or is a kind of a bookmobile or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ribbing does not exhale magnifico but it is a Navarino is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cartographer is not a aminoplast is not false if it is archival. sent2: if that something does not whistle subpopulation and it is not a kind of a Muskogee is incorrect then it does dream despite. sent3: if the Khmer is not sinkable then that the ribbing does not exhale magnifico and is a Navarino is incorrect. sent4: the Khmer does not dream despite or it is not a kind of a bookmobile or both if it does not smite eclat. sent5: if there exists something such that it does dream despite then the candlelight does not smite eclat or it is a bookmobile or both. sent6: if something is not sinkable then that it does smite inactivation and it fringes is incorrect. sent7: the candlelight does whistle subpopulation if the Khmer does not dream despite and/or it is not a kind of a bookmobile. sent8: the fact that either the magnifico is lumbosacral or it does smite laver or both is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that the magnifico is lumbosacral and/or it smites laver is not correct then that it is unsinkable is true. sent10: if something whistles angel then it is not a aminoplast. sent11: if that the magnifico smites inactivation and is a fringe is wrong then the Khmer does not smite eclat. sent12: the fact that the ouster does not whistle subpopulation and it is not a Muskogee is wrong if the parrot is not a kilderkin. sent13: the ribbing does not exhale magnifico but it is a Navarino if the parrot does not whistle pedaler. sent14: the cartographer does whistle angel and/or it is archival. sent15: that the mosaic does not whistle pedaler and is not a kilderkin is not true if the fact that something is lumbosacral is right. sent16: if the magnifico is not a kind of a fringe then the Khmer does not smite eclat. sent17: something does smite laver and it is lumbosacral if it is not a kind of a Gibraltarian. sent18: the parrot is not a kilderkin if that that the mosaic does not whistle pedaler and is not a kilderkin hold is wrong. sent19: if the candlelight does whistle subpopulation then the ouster is a kind of a Muskogee but it is not a kilderkin. sent20: the parrot does not whistle pedaler if the ouster is a Muskogee that is not a kilderkin. sent21: if that the cartographer is a Trollope or not Gibraltarian or both is not right the donor is Gibraltarian. sent22: that something is a Trollope or it is non-Gibraltarian or both is not correct if it is not a kind of a aminoplast. sent23: the fact that the ribbing is a kind of a Navarino is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the magnifico is not sinkable the fact that it does smite inactivation and does fringe is incorrect.; sent9 & sent8 -> int2: the magnifico is not sinkable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the magnifico does smite inactivation and fringes is false.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the Khmer does not smite eclat.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the Khmer does not dream despite and/or it is not a bookmobile.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the candlelight does whistle subpopulation.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the ouster is both a Muskogee and not a kilderkin.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: the parrot does not whistle pedaler.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__