there exists something such that if it is not congruous then it opposes buteonine and it does not accord meclizine.
sent1: if the halogeton is not incongruous that the gastroenterologist accords meclizine and does not hash cyclopropane is not right. sent2: something that is not a paternalism is both not helpful and not an agglomerate. sent3: the meclizine does accord meclizine. sent4: something opposes buteonine and it accords meclizine if it does not hash cyclopropane. sent5: there is something such that if it is not congruous then it does oppose buteonine and it accords meclizine. sent6: the gastroenterologist does oppose buteonine if it does not hash cyclopropane. sent7: if the gastroenterologist is not congruous then it opposes buteonine. sent8: the halogeton confederates things if there exists something such that it is a Ugaritic. sent9: the fact that something opposes buteonine hold if that it does not hash cyclopropane is right. sent10: if the halogeton is not inoperative it is congruous and it opposes buteonine. sent11: there exists something such that if it is incongruous then it opposes buteonine. sent12: the gastroenterologist opposes buteonine. sent13: if something that does confederate things is a respite it is not inoperative. sent14: the gastroenterologist opposes buteonine and does accord meclizine if it is not congruous. sent15: something that does not hash cyclopropane does oppose buteonine and does not accord meclizine. sent16: there exists something such that if it is congruous it opposes buteonine and it does not accord meclizine. sent17: the gastroenterologist opposes buteonine and does accord meclizine if it does not hash cyclopropane. sent18: the gastroenterologist does oppose buteonine but it does not accord meclizine if that it is congruous is not wrong. sent19: there is something such that it is a Ugaritic. sent20: there exists something such that if it is not congruous it does not accord meclizine.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the gastroenterologist does hash cyclopropane hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gastroenterologist is not congruous.; sent15 -> int1: if the gastroenterologist does not hash cyclopropane then it does oppose buteonine and does not accord meclizine.;
that the Nipa does hash cyclopropane is not false.
sent13 -> int2: if the halogeton does confederate things and it is a respite then it is not inoperative.; sent19 & sent8 -> int3: the halogeton confederates things.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not congruous then it opposes buteonine and it does not accord meclizine. ; $context$ = sent1: if the halogeton is not incongruous that the gastroenterologist accords meclizine and does not hash cyclopropane is not right. sent2: something that is not a paternalism is both not helpful and not an agglomerate. sent3: the meclizine does accord meclizine. sent4: something opposes buteonine and it accords meclizine if it does not hash cyclopropane. sent5: there is something such that if it is not congruous then it does oppose buteonine and it accords meclizine. sent6: the gastroenterologist does oppose buteonine if it does not hash cyclopropane. sent7: if the gastroenterologist is not congruous then it opposes buteonine. sent8: the halogeton confederates things if there exists something such that it is a Ugaritic. sent9: the fact that something opposes buteonine hold if that it does not hash cyclopropane is right. sent10: if the halogeton is not inoperative it is congruous and it opposes buteonine. sent11: there exists something such that if it is incongruous then it opposes buteonine. sent12: the gastroenterologist opposes buteonine. sent13: if something that does confederate things is a respite it is not inoperative. sent14: the gastroenterologist opposes buteonine and does accord meclizine if it is not congruous. sent15: something that does not hash cyclopropane does oppose buteonine and does not accord meclizine. sent16: there exists something such that if it is congruous it opposes buteonine and it does not accord meclizine. sent17: the gastroenterologist opposes buteonine and does accord meclizine if it does not hash cyclopropane. sent18: the gastroenterologist does oppose buteonine but it does not accord meclizine if that it is congruous is not wrong. sent19: there is something such that it is a Ugaritic. sent20: there exists something such that if it is not congruous it does not accord meclizine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the gastroenterologist does hash cyclopropane hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gastroenterologist is not congruous.; sent15 -> int1: if the gastroenterologist does not hash cyclopropane then it does oppose buteonine and does not accord meclizine.; __UNKNOWN__