that the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur and the bibliographicness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the completing happens and the Masoreticness does not occur is wrong if the unorthodoxness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur and the bibliographicness occurs is wrong if the porcineness happens. sent3: that the unorthodoxness and the non-Masoreticness occurs results in that the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur. sent4: if the completing does not occur both the humanisticness and the abounding occurs. sent5: the porcineness occurs and the humanisticness happens if the fact that the abounding does not occur is right. sent6: the going but not the powwowing Tallis happens. sent7: if the going happens but the powwowing Tallis does not occur the Masoreticness does not occur. sent8: the straight does not occur if the impoliticness but not the powwowing urobilinogen occurs. sent9: if the non-porcineness and the non-bibliographicness happens the humanisticness does not occur. sent10: the porcineness does not occur. sent11: the unorthodoxness occurs. sent12: the completing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bibliographicness does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the non-porcineness and the non-bibliographicness occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the humanisticness does not occur.; sent4 & sent12 -> int3: the humanisticness and the abounding occurs.; int3 -> int4: the humanisticness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the bibliographicness occurs.; sent7 & sent6 -> int7: the Masoreticness does not occur.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: that the unorthodoxness occurs but the Masoreticness does not occur hold.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur but the bibliographicness happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur and the bibliographicness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the completing happens and the Masoreticness does not occur is wrong if the unorthodoxness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur and the bibliographicness occurs is wrong if the porcineness happens. sent3: that the unorthodoxness and the non-Masoreticness occurs results in that the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur. sent4: if the completing does not occur both the humanisticness and the abounding occurs. sent5: the porcineness occurs and the humanisticness happens if the fact that the abounding does not occur is right. sent6: the going but not the powwowing Tallis happens. sent7: if the going happens but the powwowing Tallis does not occur the Masoreticness does not occur. sent8: the straight does not occur if the impoliticness but not the powwowing urobilinogen occurs. sent9: if the non-porcineness and the non-bibliographicness happens the humanisticness does not occur. sent10: the porcineness does not occur. sent11: the unorthodoxness occurs. sent12: the completing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bibliographicness does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the non-porcineness and the non-bibliographicness occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the humanisticness does not occur.; sent4 & sent12 -> int3: the humanisticness and the abounding occurs.; int3 -> int4: the humanisticness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the bibliographicness occurs.; sent7 & sent6 -> int7: the Masoreticness does not occur.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: that the unorthodoxness occurs but the Masoreticness does not occur hold.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the squeegeeing Elymus does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__