that if the Rottweiler is not technological then the slipstream cripples and/or is Nicaraguan is not right.
sent1: that something is not a mullet and/or it is not gestational does not hold if the fact that it is technological is not incorrect. sent2: the hematite is a kind of a reach. sent3: the slipstream does drag Rottweiler if that the hematite is a jugular and/or is not causative does not hold. sent4: the agal is a Nicaraguan. sent5: if the fact that the hematite is not a jugular and/or is not causative does not hold the fact that the slipstream drags Rottweiler is not incorrect. sent6: the Rottweiler is a greenmail and/or it is a Nicaraguan if the slipstream is technological. sent7: if the fact that the hematite is not technological or it is not a greenmail or both is incorrect that the Rottweiler is a jugular is not false. sent8: the hematite is technological. sent9: the fact that the slipstream is a jugular hold if the fact that the Rottweiler is not a greenmail and/or it is a kind of a crippled is not right. sent10: if the Rottweiler is not technological then it is a kind of a greenmail that is a jugular. sent11: the slipstream drags Rottweiler if that the hematite is not jugular and/or is causative does not hold. sent12: the slipstream is a greenmail. sent13: the fact that something cripples is not false if that it does drag Rottweiler is correct. sent14: if the Rottweiler is jugular that the hematite is either not jugular or not causative or both is false. sent15: the slipstream is not mesomorphic. sent16: the slipstream tweets agal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Rottweiler is not technological.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the Rottweiler is a greenmail and it is a kind of a jugular is right.; int1 -> int2: the Rottweiler is a jugular.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that that either the hematite is not a kind of a jugular or it is not causative or both is not incorrect is not correct.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the slipstream drags Rottweiler.; sent13 -> int5: the slipstream does cripple if it does drag Rottweiler.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the slipstream cripples.; int6 -> int7: the slipstream cripples or is a kind of a Nicaraguan or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that either the shoehorn is not a mullet or it is not gestational or both does not hold.
sent1 -> int8: if the shoehorn is technological the fact that it is not a mullet and/or is not gestational does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the Rottweiler is not technological then the slipstream cripples and/or is Nicaraguan is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a mullet and/or it is not gestational does not hold if the fact that it is technological is not incorrect. sent2: the hematite is a kind of a reach. sent3: the slipstream does drag Rottweiler if that the hematite is a jugular and/or is not causative does not hold. sent4: the agal is a Nicaraguan. sent5: if the fact that the hematite is not a jugular and/or is not causative does not hold the fact that the slipstream drags Rottweiler is not incorrect. sent6: the Rottweiler is a greenmail and/or it is a Nicaraguan if the slipstream is technological. sent7: if the fact that the hematite is not technological or it is not a greenmail or both is incorrect that the Rottweiler is a jugular is not false. sent8: the hematite is technological. sent9: the fact that the slipstream is a jugular hold if the fact that the Rottweiler is not a greenmail and/or it is a kind of a crippled is not right. sent10: if the Rottweiler is not technological then it is a kind of a greenmail that is a jugular. sent11: the slipstream drags Rottweiler if that the hematite is not jugular and/or is causative does not hold. sent12: the slipstream is a greenmail. sent13: the fact that something cripples is not false if that it does drag Rottweiler is correct. sent14: if the Rottweiler is jugular that the hematite is either not jugular or not causative or both is false. sent15: the slipstream is not mesomorphic. sent16: the slipstream tweets agal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Rottweiler is not technological.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the Rottweiler is a greenmail and it is a kind of a jugular is right.; int1 -> int2: the Rottweiler is a jugular.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that that either the hematite is not a kind of a jugular or it is not causative or both is not incorrect is not correct.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the slipstream drags Rottweiler.; sent13 -> int5: the slipstream does cripple if it does drag Rottweiler.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the slipstream cripples.; int6 -> int7: the slipstream cripples or is a kind of a Nicaraguan or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__