the gingiva is both forehanded and tibial.
sent1: there exists something such that it is factual and bentonitic. sent2: the gingiva is tibial if that the Huguenot is tibial is not wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is factual and is bentonitic is not true then the gingiva is a forehanded. sent4: if there exists something such that it is factual then the Huguenot is Deweyan and it is cryonics. sent5: if something is not cryonics that it is both factual and bentonitic is incorrect. sent6: that the varmint is not cryonics is not false if it is a Monterrey and it is tactless. sent7: the varmint is a kind of a Monterrey that is tactless. sent8: the Huguenot is a Monterrey. sent9: if something is not factual the gingiva is a forehanded. sent10: the Huguenot is a Monterrey and is bentonitic if it is not a kind of a forehanded. sent11: the Huguenot is bentonitic if it is a parsley. sent12: if something is a parsley it is tibial. sent13: the varmint is not a gutsiness if it is tactless a parsley. sent14: the varmint is a kind of a parsley. sent15: the Huguenot is a kind of a forehanded. sent16: the Huguenot is a kind of a gutsiness. sent17: if the fact that the gingiva is tibial hold it is a kind of a gutsiness. sent18: the varmint is tactless. sent19: the rug does assail brassiere if it is tactless. sent20: the fact that the varmint is bentonitic and it is factual is false if it is not forehanded. sent21: that something is not non-forehanded but tibial is not true if it is not bentonitic. sent22: if the gingiva is not a kind of a Monterrey the fact that it is a kind of forehanded thing that is tibial is not right. sent23: the varmint does chance findings if it sloshes.
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the varmint is not cryonics.; sent5 -> int2: if that the varmint is non-cryonics is correct that it is factual and it is bentonitic is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the varmint is factual and it is bentonitic does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is factual and is bentonitic is not right.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the gingiva is a forehanded.; sent12 -> int6: if the Huguenot is a parsley then the fact that it is tibial is not incorrect.;
the Huguenot is a kind of a Monterrey and it is Deweyan.
$hypothesis$ = the gingiva is both forehanded and tibial. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is factual and bentonitic. sent2: the gingiva is tibial if that the Huguenot is tibial is not wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is factual and is bentonitic is not true then the gingiva is a forehanded. sent4: if there exists something such that it is factual then the Huguenot is Deweyan and it is cryonics. sent5: if something is not cryonics that it is both factual and bentonitic is incorrect. sent6: that the varmint is not cryonics is not false if it is a Monterrey and it is tactless. sent7: the varmint is a kind of a Monterrey that is tactless. sent8: the Huguenot is a Monterrey. sent9: if something is not factual the gingiva is a forehanded. sent10: the Huguenot is a Monterrey and is bentonitic if it is not a kind of a forehanded. sent11: the Huguenot is bentonitic if it is a parsley. sent12: if something is a parsley it is tibial. sent13: the varmint is not a gutsiness if it is tactless a parsley. sent14: the varmint is a kind of a parsley. sent15: the Huguenot is a kind of a forehanded. sent16: the Huguenot is a kind of a gutsiness. sent17: if the fact that the gingiva is tibial hold it is a kind of a gutsiness. sent18: the varmint is tactless. sent19: the rug does assail brassiere if it is tactless. sent20: the fact that the varmint is bentonitic and it is factual is false if it is not forehanded. sent21: that something is not non-forehanded but tibial is not true if it is not bentonitic. sent22: if the gingiva is not a kind of a Monterrey the fact that it is a kind of forehanded thing that is tibial is not right. sent23: the varmint does chance findings if it sloshes. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the varmint is not cryonics.; sent5 -> int2: if that the varmint is non-cryonics is correct that it is factual and it is bentonitic is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the varmint is factual and it is bentonitic does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is factual and is bentonitic is not right.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the gingiva is a forehanded.; sent12 -> int6: if the Huguenot is a parsley then the fact that it is tibial is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__