the bushwhacker is Rembrandtesque and it opens Webster.
sent1: the fact that the ciliate is a kind of non-salvific thing that does open oral is not correct if it does not roll vacancy. sent2: if the sulla does not camber bladed the fact that it is non-archival thing that is an aquamarine does not hold. sent3: the ciliate catabolizes but it does not roll vacancy if the sulla does roll vacancy. sent4: The bladed does not camber sulla. sent5: something does roll vacancy if that it is not archival and is an aquamarine does not hold. sent6: if the slug is not a kind of a jiao the bushwhacker is Rembrandtesque thing that opens Webster. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-salvific thing that opens oral is not right the slug is not a jiao.
sent5 -> int1: if the fact that the sulla is not archival and is an aquamarine is wrong it rolls vacancy.;
$hypothesis$ = the bushwhacker is Rembrandtesque and it opens Webster. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ciliate is a kind of non-salvific thing that does open oral is not correct if it does not roll vacancy. sent2: if the sulla does not camber bladed the fact that it is non-archival thing that is an aquamarine does not hold. sent3: the ciliate catabolizes but it does not roll vacancy if the sulla does roll vacancy. sent4: The bladed does not camber sulla. sent5: something does roll vacancy if that it is not archival and is an aquamarine does not hold. sent6: if the slug is not a kind of a jiao the bushwhacker is Rembrandtesque thing that opens Webster. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-salvific thing that opens oral is not right the slug is not a jiao. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the fact that the sulla is not archival and is an aquamarine is wrong it rolls vacancy.; __UNKNOWN__