if the nuke does whang fillet then the justiciary disrespects justiciary.
sent1: the densimeter is not a jonquil. sent2: the justiciary is basilar if the densimeter is a paddle. sent3: the fact that that the plankton does not whang patty and does not disrespect functionalism is not correct if the densimeter does not disrespect functionalism is not false. sent4: if that the fact that the nuke is a kind of non-basilar thing that is not a jonquil is not false is not true the fact that the densimeter whangs fillet hold. sent5: the densimeter is not a jonquil if the nuke does whang fillet. sent6: if the densimeter is not basilar but it is a kind of a jonquil then it does not disrespect functionalism. sent7: the densimeter does not whang patty and does not disrespect functionalism if the justiciary disrespects justiciary. sent8: if the densimeter does disrespect justiciary the justiciary is a jonquil. sent9: something disrespects justiciary if that it is a paddle is true. sent10: that the fact that the plankton does not whang patty and does disrespect functionalism is true is not correct. sent11: if a non-basilar thing is a jonquil it does not disrespect functionalism. sent12: if the justiciary does not disrespect functionalism then that the densimeter does not disrespect justiciary and does not disrespect functionalism is not correct. sent13: something does not disrespect functionalism if it is not basilar and is not a jonquil. sent14: the densimeter does whang patty. sent15: if something that does not whang fillet does not paddle it does not disrespect justiciary. sent16: if the plankton disrespects functionalism the justiciary is a kind of a paddle. sent17: the fact that that the plankton does not whang patty and disrespects functionalism hold is not right if the densimeter does not disrespects functionalism. sent18: the densimeter is not a page and not voyeuristic. sent19: the densimeter is not basilar and it is not a jonquil if the nuke whangs fillet. sent20: if something that is not a kind of a paddle does not whang fillet it does not whang patty. sent21: the justiciary is a paddle if that the plankton does not whang patty and does not disrespect functionalism is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nuke does whang fillet.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the densimeter is a kind of non-basilar thing that is not a kind of a jonquil.; sent13 -> int2: the densimeter does not disrespect functionalism if it is a kind of non-basilar thing that is not a kind of a jonquil.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the densimeter does not disrespect functionalism.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the plankton does not whang patty and it does not disrespect functionalism does not hold.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the justiciary is a kind of a paddle.; sent9 -> int6: the justiciary disrespects justiciary if it does paddle.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the justiciary does disrespect justiciary.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the nuke does whang fillet then the justiciary disrespects justiciary. ; $context$ = sent1: the densimeter is not a jonquil. sent2: the justiciary is basilar if the densimeter is a paddle. sent3: the fact that that the plankton does not whang patty and does not disrespect functionalism is not correct if the densimeter does not disrespect functionalism is not false. sent4: if that the fact that the nuke is a kind of non-basilar thing that is not a jonquil is not false is not true the fact that the densimeter whangs fillet hold. sent5: the densimeter is not a jonquil if the nuke does whang fillet. sent6: if the densimeter is not basilar but it is a kind of a jonquil then it does not disrespect functionalism. sent7: the densimeter does not whang patty and does not disrespect functionalism if the justiciary disrespects justiciary. sent8: if the densimeter does disrespect justiciary the justiciary is a jonquil. sent9: something disrespects justiciary if that it is a paddle is true. sent10: that the fact that the plankton does not whang patty and does disrespect functionalism is true is not correct. sent11: if a non-basilar thing is a jonquil it does not disrespect functionalism. sent12: if the justiciary does not disrespect functionalism then that the densimeter does not disrespect justiciary and does not disrespect functionalism is not correct. sent13: something does not disrespect functionalism if it is not basilar and is not a jonquil. sent14: the densimeter does whang patty. sent15: if something that does not whang fillet does not paddle it does not disrespect justiciary. sent16: if the plankton disrespects functionalism the justiciary is a kind of a paddle. sent17: the fact that that the plankton does not whang patty and disrespects functionalism hold is not right if the densimeter does not disrespects functionalism. sent18: the densimeter is not a page and not voyeuristic. sent19: the densimeter is not basilar and it is not a jonquil if the nuke whangs fillet. sent20: if something that is not a kind of a paddle does not whang fillet it does not whang patty. sent21: the justiciary is a paddle if that the plankton does not whang patty and does not disrespect functionalism is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nuke does whang fillet.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the densimeter is a kind of non-basilar thing that is not a kind of a jonquil.; sent13 -> int2: the densimeter does not disrespect functionalism if it is a kind of non-basilar thing that is not a kind of a jonquil.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the densimeter does not disrespect functionalism.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the plankton does not whang patty and it does not disrespect functionalism does not hold.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the justiciary is a kind of a paddle.; sent9 -> int6: the justiciary disrespects justiciary if it does paddle.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the justiciary does disrespect justiciary.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__