the Semite is a kind of a synergism.
sent1: the fact that something is a omega-6 and it is a Millikan is false if it is not a bet. sent2: that the puffball does not eviscerate Lopholatilus but it is aversive is not right if the vibist is a legged. sent3: the coachman is not a kind of a caput if it is not a Sotho and not a rigout. sent4: that the coachman does not eviscerate Lopholatilus and is a legged is false if it is a Orizaba. sent5: the Semite is not a kind of a bet if the coachman does not bet and it is not aversive. sent6: the Semite is a kind of a synergism if that the puffball is a bet but it is not aversive is correct. sent7: something is not a bet and not aversive if it is a legged. sent8: if the coachman is a omega-6 the puffball is a bet. sent9: something is aversive if it is cross-sentential. sent10: if the fact that the hosier is a hereditament and it is a caput is wrong the vibist is not cross-sentential. sent11: that the coachman is a legged is true if the puffball does not eviscerate Lopholatilus but it is a legged. sent12: the coachman is not non-cross-sentential but a hereditament if it is not a caput. sent13: something is not aversive if the fact that it does not eviscerate Lopholatilus and is aversive is not correct. sent14: the oubliette is a omega-6 that is a Millikan if there exists something such that it bets. sent15: something is not a synergism if that it does not eviscerate Lopholatilus and it is a kind of a legged is incorrect. sent16: that the vibist eviscerates Lopholatilus is not wrong. sent17: if something is not a Millikan then it is not a synergism. sent18: the vibist is a legged. sent19: the coachman is a kind of a Orizaba. sent20: the coachman is a omega-6 if it is a Millikan. sent21: if an aversive thing is not a kind of a synergism it is a bet. sent22: the coachman is a Millikan. sent23: the coachman is not a kind of a Sotho and it is not a rigout.
sent20 & sent22 -> int1: the coachman is a kind of a omega-6.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the puffball is a bet.; sent13 -> int3: the puffball is not aversive if the fact that it does not eviscerate Lopholatilus and it is aversive is not right.; sent2 & sent18 -> int4: the fact that the puffball does not eviscerate Lopholatilus but it is aversive does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the puffball is not aversive is true.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the puffball bets but it is not aversive.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the Semite is not a synergism.
sent17 -> int7: the Semite is not a kind of a synergism if it is not a Millikan.; sent1 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the Semite is both a omega-6 and a Millikan is not correct is right if it is not a kind of a bet.; sent7 -> int9: the coachman is not a bet and it is not aversive if it is a legged.;
$hypothesis$ = the Semite is a kind of a synergism. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a omega-6 and it is a Millikan is false if it is not a bet. sent2: that the puffball does not eviscerate Lopholatilus but it is aversive is not right if the vibist is a legged. sent3: the coachman is not a kind of a caput if it is not a Sotho and not a rigout. sent4: that the coachman does not eviscerate Lopholatilus and is a legged is false if it is a Orizaba. sent5: the Semite is not a kind of a bet if the coachman does not bet and it is not aversive. sent6: the Semite is a kind of a synergism if that the puffball is a bet but it is not aversive is correct. sent7: something is not a bet and not aversive if it is a legged. sent8: if the coachman is a omega-6 the puffball is a bet. sent9: something is aversive if it is cross-sentential. sent10: if the fact that the hosier is a hereditament and it is a caput is wrong the vibist is not cross-sentential. sent11: that the coachman is a legged is true if the puffball does not eviscerate Lopholatilus but it is a legged. sent12: the coachman is not non-cross-sentential but a hereditament if it is not a caput. sent13: something is not aversive if the fact that it does not eviscerate Lopholatilus and is aversive is not correct. sent14: the oubliette is a omega-6 that is a Millikan if there exists something such that it bets. sent15: something is not a synergism if that it does not eviscerate Lopholatilus and it is a kind of a legged is incorrect. sent16: that the vibist eviscerates Lopholatilus is not wrong. sent17: if something is not a Millikan then it is not a synergism. sent18: the vibist is a legged. sent19: the coachman is a kind of a Orizaba. sent20: the coachman is a omega-6 if it is a Millikan. sent21: if an aversive thing is not a kind of a synergism it is a bet. sent22: the coachman is a Millikan. sent23: the coachman is not a kind of a Sotho and it is not a rigout. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent22 -> int1: the coachman is a kind of a omega-6.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the puffball is a bet.; sent13 -> int3: the puffball is not aversive if the fact that it does not eviscerate Lopholatilus and it is aversive is not right.; sent2 & sent18 -> int4: the fact that the puffball does not eviscerate Lopholatilus but it is aversive does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the puffball is not aversive is true.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the puffball bets but it is not aversive.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__