the cheer does not occur.
sent1: that the warmedness does not occur causes that the incriminating mattress does not occur but the whack occurs. sent2: the jingling happens if the hyperthermalness occurs. sent3: that the densitometry and the cheering happens prevents the endogeny. sent4: if that the assailing Fungia but not the assailing rug happens is not right then the impossible does not occur. sent5: that the fact that the assailing Fungia occurs and the assailing rug does not occur does not hold is not wrong if the chancing Fasciolidae occurs. sent6: the unsanitariness does not occur if that the endogeny happens and the unsanitariness occurs is not true. sent7: that the hyperthermalness occurs prevents that the densitometry does not occur. sent8: the hyperthermalness occurs and/or the unsanitariness occurs. sent9: the fact that the chancing Fasciolidae happens is true. sent10: the precaution does not occur if the precaution does not occur and/or the rebate occurs. sent11: that the unsanitariness occurs prevents that the densitometry does not occur. sent12: the fact that the endogeny occurs is not false. sent13: the cheering occurs if the hyperthermalness occurs. sent14: the scaling and the handout happens if that the impossibleness does not occur hold. sent15: if the precaution does not occur the fact that the endogeny does not occur and the cheering does not occur does not hold. sent16: that not the incriminating saddleback but the biggerness happens is caused by that the scaling happens. sent17: that either the canopy happens or the multiplying occurs or both if the incriminating mattress does not occur is not incorrect. sent18: if the perfecting occurs the precaution does not occur and/or the rebating happens. sent19: that the warming does not occur is brought about by that the incriminating saddleback does not occur and the biggerness happens.
sent8 & sent7 & sent11 -> int1: the densitometry happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cheer happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the densitometry occurs and the cheering happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the endogeny does not occur.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the cheering happens.
$hypothesis$ = the cheer does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the warmedness does not occur causes that the incriminating mattress does not occur but the whack occurs. sent2: the jingling happens if the hyperthermalness occurs. sent3: that the densitometry and the cheering happens prevents the endogeny. sent4: if that the assailing Fungia but not the assailing rug happens is not right then the impossible does not occur. sent5: that the fact that the assailing Fungia occurs and the assailing rug does not occur does not hold is not wrong if the chancing Fasciolidae occurs. sent6: the unsanitariness does not occur if that the endogeny happens and the unsanitariness occurs is not true. sent7: that the hyperthermalness occurs prevents that the densitometry does not occur. sent8: the hyperthermalness occurs and/or the unsanitariness occurs. sent9: the fact that the chancing Fasciolidae happens is true. sent10: the precaution does not occur if the precaution does not occur and/or the rebate occurs. sent11: that the unsanitariness occurs prevents that the densitometry does not occur. sent12: the fact that the endogeny occurs is not false. sent13: the cheering occurs if the hyperthermalness occurs. sent14: the scaling and the handout happens if that the impossibleness does not occur hold. sent15: if the precaution does not occur the fact that the endogeny does not occur and the cheering does not occur does not hold. sent16: that not the incriminating saddleback but the biggerness happens is caused by that the scaling happens. sent17: that either the canopy happens or the multiplying occurs or both if the incriminating mattress does not occur is not incorrect. sent18: if the perfecting occurs the precaution does not occur and/or the rebating happens. sent19: that the warming does not occur is brought about by that the incriminating saddleback does not occur and the biggerness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent7 & sent11 -> int1: the densitometry happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cheer happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the densitometry occurs and the cheering happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the endogeny does not occur.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__