that there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a Eiffel that clangors Greenpeace is correct is not right then it is not planetal hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a Eiffel it is not planetal. sent2: something is not a kind of a posterior if that it is anemophilous thing that does clangor cottonwick is incorrect. sent3: the pendulum is not planetal if it does not clangor Greenpeace. sent4: if the fact that the pendulum is a kind of a Eiffel and it does clangor Greenpeace does not hold then it is not planetal. sent5: the fact that that the pendulum is not planetal hold if the fact that the pendulum is a Eiffel and it clangors Greenpeace is correct hold.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it is a kind of anemophilous thing that clangors cottonwick is not correct then it is not posterior.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the psylla is anemophilous and it clangors cottonwick is not true it is not a posterior.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a Eiffel that clangors Greenpeace is correct is not right then it is not planetal hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a Eiffel it is not planetal. sent2: something is not a kind of a posterior if that it is anemophilous thing that does clangor cottonwick is incorrect. sent3: the pendulum is not planetal if it does not clangor Greenpeace. sent4: if the fact that the pendulum is a kind of a Eiffel and it does clangor Greenpeace does not hold then it is not planetal. sent5: the fact that that the pendulum is not planetal hold if the fact that the pendulum is a Eiffel and it clangors Greenpeace is correct hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__