the pasteurization occurs.
sent1: the quarantining bipedalism occurs. sent2: the juice and the trespass occurs. sent3: the fabricating kremlin does not occur. sent4: the myringoplasty happens and the angering occurs. sent5: the gluttony happens. sent6: that the probation occurs is prevented by that the gluttony but not the unwelcomeness happens. sent7: that the forecasting and the ablactation occurs prevents the fabricating oilskin. sent8: if the probation does not occur the pasteurization occurs. sent9: the dramaticness but not the fluff happens. sent10: the myringoplasty does not occur if that both the gluttony and the non-unwelcomeness occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gluttony but not the unwelcomeness occurs is false.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the myringoplasty does not occur.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the myringoplasty happens is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gluttony but not the unwelcomeness happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the probation does not occur is not false.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pasteurization occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the quarantining bipedalism occurs. sent2: the juice and the trespass occurs. sent3: the fabricating kremlin does not occur. sent4: the myringoplasty happens and the angering occurs. sent5: the gluttony happens. sent6: that the probation occurs is prevented by that the gluttony but not the unwelcomeness happens. sent7: that the forecasting and the ablactation occurs prevents the fabricating oilskin. sent8: if the probation does not occur the pasteurization occurs. sent9: the dramaticness but not the fluff happens. sent10: the myringoplasty does not occur if that both the gluttony and the non-unwelcomeness occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gluttony but not the unwelcomeness occurs is false.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the myringoplasty does not occur.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the myringoplasty happens is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gluttony but not the unwelcomeness happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the probation does not occur is not false.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__