the fact that the publicist does mellow glossy is not false.
sent1: if that the breeding is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-west is not incorrect then it winces and it mellows glossy. sent2: that the southeast styles hug-me-tight hold. sent3: the fact that the hug-me-tight is a display is true. sent4: that something is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-west is not incorrect if it does not spang time-ball. sent5: That the hug-me-tight styles southeast hold. sent6: if the southeast does style hug-me-tight and it is geological the hug-me-tight does not display. sent7: the fact that something does not style anthrax but it synthesizes jostle does not hold if it is not geological. sent8: everything does not spang time-ball and it is not biological. sent9: if the southeast is not a display then the publicist styles hug-me-tight and it is geological. sent10: if something is not a dimwit it mellows glossy. sent11: if the southeast styles anthrax then the publicist is not a dimwit. sent12: that something styles anthrax and it synthesizes jostle is not right if it is not geological. sent13: if the fact that the southeast does not style anthrax and does synthesize jostle is wrong then the publicist is not a kind of a dimwit. sent14: the fact that the hug-me-tight synthesizes jostle and styles anthrax is not right if something is not a dimwit. sent15: if the southeast does display it does mellow glossy and it is not geological. sent16: that the southeast styles anthrax and it does synthesize jostle is not correct. sent17: if the breeding mellows glossy then the sidesaddle is not a kind of a dimwit. sent18: the southeast does not display if that the hug-me-tight synthesizes jostle and it does style anthrax does not hold. sent19: the publicist is a kind of a display. sent20: that the southeast is not a kind of a dimwit but it does synthesize jostle does not hold. sent21: the fact that the southeast does style anthrax and it synthesizes jostle does not hold if it is not geological.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the southeast is geological.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the southeast styles hug-me-tight and it is geological.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the hug-me-tight is not a display.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the southeast is not geological.; sent7 -> int5: if the fact that the southeast is not geological is not wrong then the fact that it does not style anthrax and it synthesizes jostle is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the southeast does not style anthrax but it synthesizes jostle is not true.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the publicist is not a dimwit.; sent10 -> int8: if the publicist is not a dimwit it mellows glossy.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the publicist does not mellow glossy.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the publicist does mellow glossy is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the breeding is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-west is not incorrect then it winces and it mellows glossy. sent2: that the southeast styles hug-me-tight hold. sent3: the fact that the hug-me-tight is a display is true. sent4: that something is not a kind of a sou'-sou'-west is not incorrect if it does not spang time-ball. sent5: That the hug-me-tight styles southeast hold. sent6: if the southeast does style hug-me-tight and it is geological the hug-me-tight does not display. sent7: the fact that something does not style anthrax but it synthesizes jostle does not hold if it is not geological. sent8: everything does not spang time-ball and it is not biological. sent9: if the southeast is not a display then the publicist styles hug-me-tight and it is geological. sent10: if something is not a dimwit it mellows glossy. sent11: if the southeast styles anthrax then the publicist is not a dimwit. sent12: that something styles anthrax and it synthesizes jostle is not right if it is not geological. sent13: if the fact that the southeast does not style anthrax and does synthesize jostle is wrong then the publicist is not a kind of a dimwit. sent14: the fact that the hug-me-tight synthesizes jostle and styles anthrax is not right if something is not a dimwit. sent15: if the southeast does display it does mellow glossy and it is not geological. sent16: that the southeast styles anthrax and it does synthesize jostle is not correct. sent17: if the breeding mellows glossy then the sidesaddle is not a kind of a dimwit. sent18: the southeast does not display if that the hug-me-tight synthesizes jostle and it does style anthrax does not hold. sent19: the publicist is a kind of a display. sent20: that the southeast is not a kind of a dimwit but it does synthesize jostle does not hold. sent21: the fact that the southeast does style anthrax and it synthesizes jostle does not hold if it is not geological. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the southeast is geological.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the southeast styles hug-me-tight and it is geological.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the hug-me-tight is not a display.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the southeast is not geological.; sent7 -> int5: if the fact that the southeast is not geological is not wrong then the fact that it does not style anthrax and it synthesizes jostle is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the southeast does not style anthrax but it synthesizes jostle is not true.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the publicist is not a dimwit.; sent10 -> int8: if the publicist is not a dimwit it mellows glossy.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__