the fact that the vertebralness happens and the Hollywoodness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the repairing happens. sent2: the fact that the vertebralness and the Hollywoodness occurs is not correct if the casing horology does not occur. sent3: the casing Ellsworth does not occur if the fact that the non-vegetalness and the non-Unionness occurs is incorrect. sent4: the argumentativeness does not occur if the hoeing does not occur. sent5: if the casing horology occurs then the fact that the non-vegetalness and the non-Unionness happens does not hold. sent6: the repairing does not occur and/or the Ghanaianness happens if the fact that the casing Ellsworth does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the inelasticness and the antagonism occurs does not hold. sent8: the hoe does not occur and the flattening halfback does not occur. sent9: that the repair does not occur and/or the Ghanaianness occurs is wrong if the argumentativeness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the casing horology happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-vegetalness and the non-Unionness occurs is false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the casing Ellsworth does not occur is true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the repair does not occur and/or the Ghanaianness occurs.; sent8 -> int4: the hoeing does not occur.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: that the argumentativeness does not occur is not false.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the repairing does not occur and/or the Ghanaianness occurs is incorrect.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the casing horology does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the vertebralness happens and the Hollywoodness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the repairing happens. sent2: the fact that the vertebralness and the Hollywoodness occurs is not correct if the casing horology does not occur. sent3: the casing Ellsworth does not occur if the fact that the non-vegetalness and the non-Unionness occurs is incorrect. sent4: the argumentativeness does not occur if the hoeing does not occur. sent5: if the casing horology occurs then the fact that the non-vegetalness and the non-Unionness happens does not hold. sent6: the repairing does not occur and/or the Ghanaianness happens if the fact that the casing Ellsworth does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the inelasticness and the antagonism occurs does not hold. sent8: the hoe does not occur and the flattening halfback does not occur. sent9: that the repair does not occur and/or the Ghanaianness occurs is wrong if the argumentativeness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the casing horology happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-vegetalness and the non-Unionness occurs is false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the casing Ellsworth does not occur is true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the repair does not occur and/or the Ghanaianness occurs.; sent8 -> int4: the hoeing does not occur.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: that the argumentativeness does not occur is not false.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the repairing does not occur and/or the Ghanaianness occurs is incorrect.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the casing horology does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__