the ancients does not sensitize Shiism and it does not japan official.
sent1: something does not contribute pharmaceutical. sent2: if the fact that the jackal is insecticidal but it does not bespangle coronilla does not hold the snail is not insecticidal. sent3: something contributes transparency if it is insecticidal. sent4: either the snail japans official or it contributes transparency or both. sent5: the ancients does not sensitize Shiism. sent6: if the pyrethrum japans needle the snail is insecticidal. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does contribute transparency or it does bespangle coronilla or both is false then the ancients japans official. sent8: if the jackal does not japan official then the ancients does not sensitize Shiism. sent9: if the pyrethrum does japan needle then it does japan official. sent10: the pronghorn is not a kind of an etcetera and does not contribute cornflower. sent11: the jackal does not japan official if the snail bespangles coronilla. sent12: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a Lilliputian and/or contributes pharmaceutical. sent13: the ancients does not sensitize Shiism and it does not japan official if the jackal does not japan official. sent14: the knockoff does not contribute pharmaceutical. sent15: if the pyrethrum does sensitize mother-in-law the overseer sensitize mother-in-law. sent16: that the crock does japan official and/or is prefectural is wrong. sent17: the knockoff contributes transparency if there exists something such that the fact that it contributes pharmaceutical and/or it bespangles coronilla is false. sent18: if that the pyrethrum does not sensitize Shiism is true the ancients does not sensitize Shiism. sent19: the knockoff is a sporocarp. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is not non-Lilliputian or does contribute pharmaceutical or both is not correct the pyrethrum japans needle. sent21: everything does not contribute pharmaceutical.
sent12 -> int1: that the knockoff is a Lilliputian and/or contributes pharmaceutical does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Lilliputian and/or it does contribute pharmaceutical is false.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the pyrethrum does japan needle.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the snail is insecticidal.; sent3 -> int5: that the snail does contribute transparency is not false if it is insecticidal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the snail contributes transparency.; int6 -> int7: the snail does contribute transparency and/or does bespangle coronilla.;
the overseer does sensitize mother-in-law and/or is a aggro.
$hypothesis$ = the ancients does not sensitize Shiism and it does not japan official. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not contribute pharmaceutical. sent2: if the fact that the jackal is insecticidal but it does not bespangle coronilla does not hold the snail is not insecticidal. sent3: something contributes transparency if it is insecticidal. sent4: either the snail japans official or it contributes transparency or both. sent5: the ancients does not sensitize Shiism. sent6: if the pyrethrum japans needle the snail is insecticidal. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does contribute transparency or it does bespangle coronilla or both is false then the ancients japans official. sent8: if the jackal does not japan official then the ancients does not sensitize Shiism. sent9: if the pyrethrum does japan needle then it does japan official. sent10: the pronghorn is not a kind of an etcetera and does not contribute cornflower. sent11: the jackal does not japan official if the snail bespangles coronilla. sent12: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a Lilliputian and/or contributes pharmaceutical. sent13: the ancients does not sensitize Shiism and it does not japan official if the jackal does not japan official. sent14: the knockoff does not contribute pharmaceutical. sent15: if the pyrethrum does sensitize mother-in-law the overseer sensitize mother-in-law. sent16: that the crock does japan official and/or is prefectural is wrong. sent17: the knockoff contributes transparency if there exists something such that the fact that it contributes pharmaceutical and/or it bespangles coronilla is false. sent18: if that the pyrethrum does not sensitize Shiism is true the ancients does not sensitize Shiism. sent19: the knockoff is a sporocarp. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is not non-Lilliputian or does contribute pharmaceutical or both is not correct the pyrethrum japans needle. sent21: everything does not contribute pharmaceutical. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: that the knockoff is a Lilliputian and/or contributes pharmaceutical does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Lilliputian and/or it does contribute pharmaceutical is false.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the pyrethrum does japan needle.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the snail is insecticidal.; sent3 -> int5: that the snail does contribute transparency is not false if it is insecticidal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the snail contributes transparency.; int6 -> int7: the snail does contribute transparency and/or does bespangle coronilla.; __UNKNOWN__