the tobramycin does not articulate gravestone.
sent1: that something is a kind of non-lymphocytic thing that does not syllogize otology does not hold if it is not a kind of a sportsmanship. sent2: the tobramycin syllogizes otology and is lymphocytic. sent3: the bettor does not articulate matzo if the Sabbatarian does cause and it does articulate matzo. sent4: if the fact that the fucoid inspires is not false that the poppy is not a mako and/or it is not autotypic does not hold. sent5: something articulates gravestone if that it is not a sportsmanship and does not misbehave does not hold. sent6: something is not a kind of a sportsmanship and does not misbehave if that it does not articulate matzo is not wrong. sent7: if something is lymphocytic then the fact that it is not a kind of a sportsmanship and does not misbehave is wrong. sent8: the tobramycin is postictal. sent9: the Sabbatarian is a cause that does articulate matzo if there exists something such that it is not a mako. sent10: if the fucoid is an avalanche then it does not syllogize reenactment and it is a backslapper. sent11: something is a Arp if it is bracteal. sent12: the fact that something is a sportsmanship and does not misbehave is not true if it is lymphocytic. sent13: if that the fact that the poppy either is not a mako or is not autotypic or both does not hold is true the paramedic is not a mako. sent14: if something is a backslapper then it inspires. sent15: the fucoid avalanches.
sent2 -> int1: the tobramycin is lymphocytic.; sent7 -> int2: that the fact that that the tobramycin is not the sportsmanship and does not misbehave is false hold if the tobramycin is lymphocytic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the tobramycin is not a sportsmanship and does not misbehave does not hold.; sent5 -> int4: if that the tobramycin is not a sportsmanship and does not misbehave is false then it does articulate gravestone.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the tobramycin does not articulate gravestone.
sent1 -> int5: if the bettor is not a kind of a sportsmanship then that it is non-lymphocytic thing that does not syllogize otology is not right.; sent6 -> int6: if the bettor does not articulate matzo it is not a kind of a sportsmanship and does not misbehave.; sent14 -> int7: if the fucoid is a backslapper then it inspires.; sent10 & sent15 -> int8: the fucoid does not syllogize reenactment and is a backslapper.; int8 -> int9: the fucoid is a backslapper.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the fucoid inspires is right.; sent4 & int10 -> int11: that the poppy is either not a mako or not autotypic or both is not true.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the paramedic is not a kind of a mako is correct.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is not a mako.; int13 & sent9 -> int14: the Sabbatarian does cause and it articulates matzo.; sent3 & int14 -> int15: the bettor does not articulate matzo.; int6 & int15 -> int16: the bettor is not a sportsmanship and it does not misbehave.; int16 -> int17: the bettor is not a kind of a sportsmanship.; int5 & int17 -> int18: that the bettor is not lymphocytic and it does not syllogize otology is false.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that the fact that it is not lymphocytic and it does not syllogize otology does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the tobramycin does not articulate gravestone. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a kind of non-lymphocytic thing that does not syllogize otology does not hold if it is not a kind of a sportsmanship. sent2: the tobramycin syllogizes otology and is lymphocytic. sent3: the bettor does not articulate matzo if the Sabbatarian does cause and it does articulate matzo. sent4: if the fact that the fucoid inspires is not false that the poppy is not a mako and/or it is not autotypic does not hold. sent5: something articulates gravestone if that it is not a sportsmanship and does not misbehave does not hold. sent6: something is not a kind of a sportsmanship and does not misbehave if that it does not articulate matzo is not wrong. sent7: if something is lymphocytic then the fact that it is not a kind of a sportsmanship and does not misbehave is wrong. sent8: the tobramycin is postictal. sent9: the Sabbatarian is a cause that does articulate matzo if there exists something such that it is not a mako. sent10: if the fucoid is an avalanche then it does not syllogize reenactment and it is a backslapper. sent11: something is a Arp if it is bracteal. sent12: the fact that something is a sportsmanship and does not misbehave is not true if it is lymphocytic. sent13: if that the fact that the poppy either is not a mako or is not autotypic or both does not hold is true the paramedic is not a mako. sent14: if something is a backslapper then it inspires. sent15: the fucoid avalanches. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the tobramycin is lymphocytic.; sent7 -> int2: that the fact that that the tobramycin is not the sportsmanship and does not misbehave is false hold if the tobramycin is lymphocytic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the tobramycin is not a sportsmanship and does not misbehave does not hold.; sent5 -> int4: if that the tobramycin is not a sportsmanship and does not misbehave is false then it does articulate gravestone.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__