the flare occurs.
sent1: the flat happens if that the flaring does not occur and the bowing Siren does not occur does not hold. sent2: that both the fernlessness and the bowing gain happens is brought about by that the criticizing cashier does not occur. sent3: if the fernlessness occurs the prolusoriness occurs. sent4: that the prolusoriness does not occur is caused by that the homozygousness and the bowing Siren happens. sent5: the criticizing cashier happens if the criticizing cashier occurs and/or the recovery does not occur. sent6: that the criticizing cashier does not occur is right. sent7: if the homozygousness does not occur that the fact that the flaring does not occur and the bowing Siren does not occur is not false is false. sent8: the flare occurs and the bowing Siren occurs if that the homozygousness does not occur is right. sent9: both the homozygousness and the Gula occurs. sent10: if the criticizing cashier happens then the bowing gain and the fernedness happens. sent11: the bowing Siren occurs if the fact that the flare occurs is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the flaring happens is not incorrect.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bowing Siren occurs is not false.; sent9 -> int2: the homozygousness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the homozygousness occurs and the bowing Siren happens.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the prolusoriness does not occur.; sent2 & sent6 -> int5: the fernlessness and the bowing gain occurs.; int5 -> int6: that the fernlessness occurs is not wrong.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the prolusoriness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the flare occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the flare occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the flat happens if that the flaring does not occur and the bowing Siren does not occur does not hold. sent2: that both the fernlessness and the bowing gain happens is brought about by that the criticizing cashier does not occur. sent3: if the fernlessness occurs the prolusoriness occurs. sent4: that the prolusoriness does not occur is caused by that the homozygousness and the bowing Siren happens. sent5: the criticizing cashier happens if the criticizing cashier occurs and/or the recovery does not occur. sent6: that the criticizing cashier does not occur is right. sent7: if the homozygousness does not occur that the fact that the flaring does not occur and the bowing Siren does not occur is not false is false. sent8: the flare occurs and the bowing Siren occurs if that the homozygousness does not occur is right. sent9: both the homozygousness and the Gula occurs. sent10: if the criticizing cashier happens then the bowing gain and the fernedness happens. sent11: the bowing Siren occurs if the fact that the flare occurs is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the flaring happens is not incorrect.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bowing Siren occurs is not false.; sent9 -> int2: the homozygousness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the homozygousness occurs and the bowing Siren happens.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the prolusoriness does not occur.; sent2 & sent6 -> int5: the fernlessness and the bowing gain occurs.; int5 -> int6: that the fernlessness occurs is not wrong.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the prolusoriness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__