the fact that there is something such that if it is intercellular and not diligent then it gloms airfare is wrong.
sent1: the disputant is not non-diligent if that it is a husk and servomechanical is not wrong. sent2: the electroencephalograph is diligent if it is a inspissation but not a rise. sent3: if the electroencephalograph is both a broom and diligent then it is metabolic. sent4: if the electroencephalograph is a hydrocephalus and it does skip Callionymidae it is intercellular. sent5: the electroencephalograph is diligent if it is magnetic and it is not a chronograph. sent6: if the electroencephalograph gloms airfare and is a kind of a Brutus then it is undeniable. sent7: the albite does glom airfare if it is a Lycosa and it is a sunburst. sent8: there exists something such that if it is informal and it is technological then it subtilizes holiday. sent9: a traumatology that is not diligent is episcopal. sent10: there is something such that if it is a lumberyard and it is a chiasmus it is a capitalist. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a shrimp and it is not magnetic it is unthinkable. sent12: if the electroencephalograph is intercellular and it is diligent then it does glom airfare. sent13: the electroencephalograph gloms airfare if it is intercellular and it is not diligent. sent14: there is something such that if it is an abandonment and it is not chromatographic then it is regressive. sent15: if the vascularization is a kind of diligent thing that is not a sharpness it is acetonic. sent16: if the electroencephalograph is intercellular and it is a traumatology then it is a kind of a inspissation. sent17: there exists something such that if it is nuclear and radiates it subtilizes walrus.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
if the orbit is a traumatology and is not diligent then it is episcopal.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is intercellular and not diligent then it gloms airfare is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the disputant is not non-diligent if that it is a husk and servomechanical is not wrong. sent2: the electroencephalograph is diligent if it is a inspissation but not a rise. sent3: if the electroencephalograph is both a broom and diligent then it is metabolic. sent4: if the electroencephalograph is a hydrocephalus and it does skip Callionymidae it is intercellular. sent5: the electroencephalograph is diligent if it is magnetic and it is not a chronograph. sent6: if the electroencephalograph gloms airfare and is a kind of a Brutus then it is undeniable. sent7: the albite does glom airfare if it is a Lycosa and it is a sunburst. sent8: there exists something such that if it is informal and it is technological then it subtilizes holiday. sent9: a traumatology that is not diligent is episcopal. sent10: there is something such that if it is a lumberyard and it is a chiasmus it is a capitalist. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a shrimp and it is not magnetic it is unthinkable. sent12: if the electroencephalograph is intercellular and it is diligent then it does glom airfare. sent13: the electroencephalograph gloms airfare if it is intercellular and it is not diligent. sent14: there is something such that if it is an abandonment and it is not chromatographic then it is regressive. sent15: if the vascularization is a kind of diligent thing that is not a sharpness it is acetonic. sent16: if the electroencephalograph is intercellular and it is a traumatology then it is a kind of a inspissation. sent17: there exists something such that if it is nuclear and radiates it subtilizes walrus. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__