the basketball and the notification happens.
sent1: that the adhering Hazardia does not occur and the deposition does not occur is correct if the fretting raffle does not occur. sent2: the conjunctiveness happens if the straight-arm does not occur and the lockage happens. sent3: the prudentness does not occur. sent4: the limbicness does not occur and the adhering Lamaism does not occur if the adhering centrifugation does not occur. sent5: either that the adhering Hazardia does not occur or the deposition or both is triggered by the sweeping. sent6: that the basketball occurs and the notification happens does not hold if that the conjunctiveness does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that the adhering agitprop does not occur and the exaggeration occurs is incorrect if the fact that the mystic occurs is right. sent8: both the basketball and the fretting raffle occurs. sent9: that the straight-arm and the lockage occurs is not right. sent10: that the limbicness does not occur brings about that both the mysticness and the drizzle occurs. sent11: that not the sweeping but the prudentness occurs is brought about by that the adhering Hazardia does not occur. sent12: that the sweeping does not occur but the prudentness happens brings about the non-conjunctiveness. sent13: the straight-arm does not occur. sent14: the adhering kiaat does not occur but the laxness occurs. sent15: if the adhering Hazardia does not occur then the notification occurs. sent16: if that the adhering agitprop does not occur and the exaggeration occurs is false then the fretting raffle does not occur. sent17: if that the straight-arm does not occur and the lockage occurs is not true then the prudentness happens. sent18: the fact that the sweeping happens is correct if the conjunctiveness occurs. sent19: that the notification does not occur is prevented by either that the adhering Hazardia does not occur or that the deposition happens or both. sent20: both the non-tragicomicness and the mowing occurs. sent21: the channels occurs. sent22: not the auralness but the immunization happens. sent23: the adhering centrifugation does not occur if the fact that the suction does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the straight-arm does not occur and the lockage occurs does not hold.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the prudentness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: not the straight-arm but the lockage occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the conjunctiveness happens is correct.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the sweeping happens.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the adhering Hazardia does not occur and/or the deposition happens.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the notification occurs.; sent8 -> int8: the basketball occurs.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the basketball occurs and the notification happens is false.
$hypothesis$ = the basketball and the notification happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the adhering Hazardia does not occur and the deposition does not occur is correct if the fretting raffle does not occur. sent2: the conjunctiveness happens if the straight-arm does not occur and the lockage happens. sent3: the prudentness does not occur. sent4: the limbicness does not occur and the adhering Lamaism does not occur if the adhering centrifugation does not occur. sent5: either that the adhering Hazardia does not occur or the deposition or both is triggered by the sweeping. sent6: that the basketball occurs and the notification happens does not hold if that the conjunctiveness does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that the adhering agitprop does not occur and the exaggeration occurs is incorrect if the fact that the mystic occurs is right. sent8: both the basketball and the fretting raffle occurs. sent9: that the straight-arm and the lockage occurs is not right. sent10: that the limbicness does not occur brings about that both the mysticness and the drizzle occurs. sent11: that not the sweeping but the prudentness occurs is brought about by that the adhering Hazardia does not occur. sent12: that the sweeping does not occur but the prudentness happens brings about the non-conjunctiveness. sent13: the straight-arm does not occur. sent14: the adhering kiaat does not occur but the laxness occurs. sent15: if the adhering Hazardia does not occur then the notification occurs. sent16: if that the adhering agitprop does not occur and the exaggeration occurs is false then the fretting raffle does not occur. sent17: if that the straight-arm does not occur and the lockage occurs is not true then the prudentness happens. sent18: the fact that the sweeping happens is correct if the conjunctiveness occurs. sent19: that the notification does not occur is prevented by either that the adhering Hazardia does not occur or that the deposition happens or both. sent20: both the non-tragicomicness and the mowing occurs. sent21: the channels occurs. sent22: not the auralness but the immunization happens. sent23: the adhering centrifugation does not occur if the fact that the suction does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the straight-arm does not occur and the lockage occurs does not hold.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the prudentness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: not the straight-arm but the lockage occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the conjunctiveness happens is correct.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the sweeping happens.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the adhering Hazardia does not occur and/or the deposition happens.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the notification occurs.; sent8 -> int8: the basketball occurs.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__