the nurse-midwife is not a agave if the seersucker is not a desert.
sent1: if the tiercel is not a desert the seersucker is a bubbler. sent2: if the fact that the seersucker is not a desert is true then that the nurse-midwife is a kind of a agave is true. sent3: the fact that the nurse-midwife either is not a agave or is a bubbler or both does not hold. sent4: if that the seersucker is a kind of a rbi and it does officialize seersucker is false it is not a kind of a rbi. sent5: the nurse-midwife does not officialize ma. sent6: the nurse-midwife is a agave. sent7: the tiercel is a desert and it is a agave if the seersucker is not a rbi. sent8: if something is not intrauterine that that it is a rbi and does officialize seersucker hold is not true. sent9: if the tiercel does not officialize ma and/or is a bubbler then that the nurse-midwife is a agave is correct. sent10: the tiercel is not a bubbler. sent11: the nurse-midwife is not a bubbler. sent12: that the seersucker officializes ma if that the tiercel is not a desert or is a agave or both does not hold is not incorrect. sent13: if the tiercel is a bubbler then the nurse-midwife is not a agave. sent14: if the fact that the tiercel does not officialize ma or is a bubbler or both is wrong the seersucker deserts. sent15: the handloom does officialize ma if the fact that the tiercel is a agave is correct. sent16: that the handloom either is not virological or is a desert or both is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tiercel does not officialize ma or it is a bubbler or both is not correct.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the seersucker does desert.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the seersucker is not a desert is right.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the tiercel does not officialize ma or it is a bubbler or both.;
the handloom does officialize ma.
sent8 -> int4: the fact that the seersucker is a rbi that officializes seersucker is false if it is not intrauterine.;
$hypothesis$ = the nurse-midwife is not a agave if the seersucker is not a desert. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tiercel is not a desert the seersucker is a bubbler. sent2: if the fact that the seersucker is not a desert is true then that the nurse-midwife is a kind of a agave is true. sent3: the fact that the nurse-midwife either is not a agave or is a bubbler or both does not hold. sent4: if that the seersucker is a kind of a rbi and it does officialize seersucker is false it is not a kind of a rbi. sent5: the nurse-midwife does not officialize ma. sent6: the nurse-midwife is a agave. sent7: the tiercel is a desert and it is a agave if the seersucker is not a rbi. sent8: if something is not intrauterine that that it is a rbi and does officialize seersucker hold is not true. sent9: if the tiercel does not officialize ma and/or is a bubbler then that the nurse-midwife is a agave is correct. sent10: the tiercel is not a bubbler. sent11: the nurse-midwife is not a bubbler. sent12: that the seersucker officializes ma if that the tiercel is not a desert or is a agave or both does not hold is not incorrect. sent13: if the tiercel is a bubbler then the nurse-midwife is not a agave. sent14: if the fact that the tiercel does not officialize ma or is a bubbler or both is wrong the seersucker deserts. sent15: the handloom does officialize ma if the fact that the tiercel is a agave is correct. sent16: that the handloom either is not virological or is a desert or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tiercel does not officialize ma or it is a bubbler or both is not correct.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the seersucker does desert.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the seersucker is not a desert is right.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the tiercel does not officialize ma or it is a bubbler or both.; __UNKNOWN__