if the aesculapianness does not occur that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the jamming gibbon occurs is false.
sent1: the divorcing does not occur but the switch occurs. sent2: the jamming gibbon occurs. sent3: that both the non-antiapartheidness and the jamming gibbon happens does not hold if the aesculapianness occurs. sent4: if the aesculapianness does not occur the fact that both the antiapartheidness and the jamming gibbon happens is false. sent5: not the discoursing but the Seljukness happens. sent6: not the divorce but the Kabbalism happens. sent7: that the exenteration does not occur is prevented by that not the sketch but the sense occurs. sent8: that the aesculapianness does not occur is prevented by that both the antiapartheidness and the jamming gibbon occurs. sent9: the goingness does not occur. sent10: the masking bellpull occurs. sent11: the non-antiapartheidness and the jamming gibbon happens if the fact that the aesculapianness does not occur is true. sent12: that the tyrannizing FTP does not occur but the jamming tumult happens is not correct if the fact that the teeming does not occur is true. sent13: not the bituminoidness but the exenteration happens. sent14: if the worse does not occur the fact that both the translatableness and the lustrum occurs does not hold. sent15: if that the covert and the non-aesculapianness occurs does not hold the Atlanticness does not occur. sent16: the surface occurs if both the non-heterozygousness and the masking metabolism happens. sent17: that not the philosophicness but the lustrum occurs does not hold if that the surfaceness does not occur hold. sent18: the embrowning sizzle happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the antiapartheidness but the jamming gibbon occurs.;
both the non-Atlanticness and the philosophicness happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the aesculapianness does not occur that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the jamming gibbon occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the divorcing does not occur but the switch occurs. sent2: the jamming gibbon occurs. sent3: that both the non-antiapartheidness and the jamming gibbon happens does not hold if the aesculapianness occurs. sent4: if the aesculapianness does not occur the fact that both the antiapartheidness and the jamming gibbon happens is false. sent5: not the discoursing but the Seljukness happens. sent6: not the divorce but the Kabbalism happens. sent7: that the exenteration does not occur is prevented by that not the sketch but the sense occurs. sent8: that the aesculapianness does not occur is prevented by that both the antiapartheidness and the jamming gibbon occurs. sent9: the goingness does not occur. sent10: the masking bellpull occurs. sent11: the non-antiapartheidness and the jamming gibbon happens if the fact that the aesculapianness does not occur is true. sent12: that the tyrannizing FTP does not occur but the jamming tumult happens is not correct if the fact that the teeming does not occur is true. sent13: not the bituminoidness but the exenteration happens. sent14: if the worse does not occur the fact that both the translatableness and the lustrum occurs does not hold. sent15: if that the covert and the non-aesculapianness occurs does not hold the Atlanticness does not occur. sent16: the surface occurs if both the non-heterozygousness and the masking metabolism happens. sent17: that not the philosophicness but the lustrum occurs does not hold if that the surfaceness does not occur hold. sent18: the embrowning sizzle happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the antiapartheidness but the jamming gibbon occurs.; __UNKNOWN__