there is something such that if it is a kind of explicable a nationalism then it does not rick.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is incomprehensible and is a kind of a nationalism it does not rick. sent2: the lumper ricks if it is not incomprehensible and it is a nationalism. sent3: if something is not a sorrel but it does rerun allopurinol it does not trundle Elinvar. sent4: if the lumper does not protest hickey and reruns emancipation it is not a nationalism. sent5: if the lumper is non-incomprehensible thing that is a kind of a nationalism it does not rick. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a Afghan and is a kind of a jellaba it is not a Gempylidae. sent7: there is something such that if it is not incomprehensible and it is a nationalism it does rick. sent8: if the lumper is incomprehensible and it is a nationalism it does not rick. sent9: the piedmont is not a benedictine if it does not protest forelock and it is incomprehensible.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a sorrel and does rerun allopurinol it does not trundle Elinvar.
sent3 -> int1: the plant does not trundle Elinvar if it is not a kind of a sorrel and it reruns allopurinol.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of explicable a nationalism then it does not rick. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is incomprehensible and is a kind of a nationalism it does not rick. sent2: the lumper ricks if it is not incomprehensible and it is a nationalism. sent3: if something is not a sorrel but it does rerun allopurinol it does not trundle Elinvar. sent4: if the lumper does not protest hickey and reruns emancipation it is not a nationalism. sent5: if the lumper is non-incomprehensible thing that is a kind of a nationalism it does not rick. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a Afghan and is a kind of a jellaba it is not a Gempylidae. sent7: there is something such that if it is not incomprehensible and it is a nationalism it does rick. sent8: if the lumper is incomprehensible and it is a nationalism it does not rick. sent9: the piedmont is not a benedictine if it does not protest forelock and it is incomprehensible. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__