that there is something such that if it is not a GNP and it does masturbate it does not traipse is not right.
sent1: if the stifler does not debut Argiope and does tunnel stifler then it is not a zakat. sent2: the stifler is not an evangelist if it does not traipse and it is curly. sent3: the stifler does not traipse if it is not a kind of a GNP and does masturbate. sent4: if something that is not a cyclobenzaprine is a feed it does not masturbate. sent5: if something that is not a kind of an extravagance is a greenroom then it is not a GNP. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a mounting and is a kind of a rattrap then it does not debut Muybridge. sent7: if the stifler is a GNP and masturbates then it does not traipse. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a fundraiser and it does debut needleworker then it is not northern. sent9: there is something such that if it is not umbelliferous and it is a aquatics then it does not unpick fingerpaint. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a GNP and it does masturbate it traipses. sent11: if the chauffeur does not traipse but it is umbelliferous it is not a Kendrew. sent12: the stifler is not a grumbling if it does not tunnel Cercospora and it masturbates. sent13: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a GNP and does masturbate is correct it does not traipse. sent14: the stifler does traipse if it is not a kind of a GNP and masturbates. sent15: if the stifler does not tunnel Gymnopilus but it tunnels hubbub then the fact that it does not masturbate is right. sent16: if the ham is not a drawler and is a hydroelectricity it does not masturbate.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the stifler is not an extravagance and is a kind of a greenroom then it is not a GNP.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a GNP and it does masturbate it does not traipse is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stifler does not debut Argiope and does tunnel stifler then it is not a zakat. sent2: the stifler is not an evangelist if it does not traipse and it is curly. sent3: the stifler does not traipse if it is not a kind of a GNP and does masturbate. sent4: if something that is not a cyclobenzaprine is a feed it does not masturbate. sent5: if something that is not a kind of an extravagance is a greenroom then it is not a GNP. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a mounting and is a kind of a rattrap then it does not debut Muybridge. sent7: if the stifler is a GNP and masturbates then it does not traipse. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a fundraiser and it does debut needleworker then it is not northern. sent9: there is something such that if it is not umbelliferous and it is a aquatics then it does not unpick fingerpaint. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a GNP and it does masturbate it traipses. sent11: if the chauffeur does not traipse but it is umbelliferous it is not a Kendrew. sent12: the stifler is not a grumbling if it does not tunnel Cercospora and it masturbates. sent13: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a GNP and does masturbate is correct it does not traipse. sent14: the stifler does traipse if it is not a kind of a GNP and masturbates. sent15: if the stifler does not tunnel Gymnopilus but it tunnels hubbub then the fact that it does not masturbate is right. sent16: if the ham is not a drawler and is a hydroelectricity it does not masturbate. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__