that that the fact that both the non-usefulness and the non-Machiavellianness occurs is wrong if the brisance happens hold does not hold.
sent1: that the protozoologicalness occurs is right. sent2: if the fact that the demineralizing densitometry does not occur and the protozoologicalness does not occur does not hold the twinkling does not occur. sent3: the fact that the demineralizing densitometry does not occur and the protozoologicalness does not occur does not hold if the brisance does not occur. sent4: that the demineralizing densitometry occurs and the brisance occurs yields that the unexpendableness does not occur. sent5: if the protozoologicalness happens then the demineralizing densitometry happens. sent6: the fact that the non-usefulness and the non-Machiavellianness occurs is false if that the unexpendableness does not occur hold. sent7: that the aspersion does not occur and the phone-in does not occur is triggered by the Wordsworthianness. sent8: the fact that the usefulness happens and the Machiavellianness does not occur is not correct if the brisance occurs. sent9: the expendableness leads to that the usefulness does not occur and the Machiavellian does not occur. sent10: the usefulness does not occur and the Machiavellian does not occur.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the demineralizing densitometry happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brisance happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the demineralizing densitometry occurs and the brisance happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the unexpendableness does not occur.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that the non-usefulness and the non-Machiavellianness happens is wrong.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the twinkle does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that that the fact that both the non-usefulness and the non-Machiavellianness occurs is wrong if the brisance happens hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the protozoologicalness occurs is right. sent2: if the fact that the demineralizing densitometry does not occur and the protozoologicalness does not occur does not hold the twinkling does not occur. sent3: the fact that the demineralizing densitometry does not occur and the protozoologicalness does not occur does not hold if the brisance does not occur. sent4: that the demineralizing densitometry occurs and the brisance occurs yields that the unexpendableness does not occur. sent5: if the protozoologicalness happens then the demineralizing densitometry happens. sent6: the fact that the non-usefulness and the non-Machiavellianness occurs is false if that the unexpendableness does not occur hold. sent7: that the aspersion does not occur and the phone-in does not occur is triggered by the Wordsworthianness. sent8: the fact that the usefulness happens and the Machiavellianness does not occur is not correct if the brisance occurs. sent9: the expendableness leads to that the usefulness does not occur and the Machiavellian does not occur. sent10: the usefulness does not occur and the Machiavellian does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the demineralizing densitometry happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brisance happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the demineralizing densitometry occurs and the brisance happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the unexpendableness does not occur.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that the non-usefulness and the non-Machiavellianness happens is wrong.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__