the shovelhead is not useless.
sent1: the shovelhead is a friendly that does not bespangle if the cube does not bespangle. sent2: the shovelhead is a laelia if the vermiculation is not a friendly. sent3: something does not bespangle if it bullshits fractal and it is offing. sent4: something is appellate thing that is non-destructive if it does not perambulate. sent5: the cube is offing if the fact that the margarin is appellate is correct. sent6: if the fact that the vermiculation does not anticipate Trichostema but it is a laelia is false the margarin does not perambulate. sent7: if the margarin is not offing the cube is appellate but not offing. sent8: the fact that the vermiculation does not anticipate Trichostema and is a laelia is not true. sent9: if something that is friendly does not bespangle then it is not useless. sent10: the cube bullshits fractal and it is a devoutness. sent11: the shovelhead is a friendly. sent12: the shovelhead does perambulate.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the margarin does not perambulate.; sent4 -> int2: the margarin is appellate and is not destructive if it does not perambulate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the margarin is both appellate and not destructive.; int3 -> int4: the margarin is appellate.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the cube is offing.; sent10 -> int6: the cube bullshits fractal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cube does bullshit fractal and it is offing.; sent3 -> int8: if the cube bullshits fractal and it is offing then it does not bespangle.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the cube does not bespangle hold.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the shovelhead is friendly but it does not bespangle.; sent9 -> int11: if the shovelhead is a friendly but it does not bespangle then it is not useless.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the shovelhead is not useless. ; $context$ = sent1: the shovelhead is a friendly that does not bespangle if the cube does not bespangle. sent2: the shovelhead is a laelia if the vermiculation is not a friendly. sent3: something does not bespangle if it bullshits fractal and it is offing. sent4: something is appellate thing that is non-destructive if it does not perambulate. sent5: the cube is offing if the fact that the margarin is appellate is correct. sent6: if the fact that the vermiculation does not anticipate Trichostema but it is a laelia is false the margarin does not perambulate. sent7: if the margarin is not offing the cube is appellate but not offing. sent8: the fact that the vermiculation does not anticipate Trichostema and is a laelia is not true. sent9: if something that is friendly does not bespangle then it is not useless. sent10: the cube bullshits fractal and it is a devoutness. sent11: the shovelhead is a friendly. sent12: the shovelhead does perambulate. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the margarin does not perambulate.; sent4 -> int2: the margarin is appellate and is not destructive if it does not perambulate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the margarin is both appellate and not destructive.; int3 -> int4: the margarin is appellate.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the cube is offing.; sent10 -> int6: the cube bullshits fractal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cube does bullshit fractal and it is offing.; sent3 -> int8: if the cube bullshits fractal and it is offing then it does not bespangle.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the cube does not bespangle hold.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the shovelhead is friendly but it does not bespangle.; sent9 -> int11: if the shovelhead is a friendly but it does not bespangle then it is not useless.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__