the fact that the heterograft does desecrate Wilton and is a kind of a flatness is wrong.
sent1: the heterograft does desecrate Wilton if the fact that the casing untunes Barkley and is not neolithic is wrong. sent2: if the crofter is branchial then it is neolithic. sent3: if the fact that the heterograft is typical and is not a psychrometer is wrong then it does not debar depressor. sent4: that something is a kind of a slalom but it is not flatness is false if it does not debar depressor. sent5: if the fact that something slaloms and is not flatness is not right it is flatness. sent6: something does debar depressor if the fact that it is neolithic and does not debar depressor is not right. sent7: if that the casing is branchial but it does not untune Barkley is incorrect it does untune Barkley. sent8: the crofter is branchial. sent9: that the heterograft is typical thing that is not a kind of a psychrometer is false. sent10: if the crofter is neolithic that the fact that the casing untunes Barkley but it is not neolithic is wrong hold.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the crofter is neolithic is right.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that that the casing does untune Barkley but it is not neolithic does not hold is not wrong.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the heterograft does desecrate Wilton is not incorrect.; sent5 -> int4: the heterograft is a flatness if that it is a kind of a slalom and it is not a kind of a flatness does not hold.; sent4 -> int5: that the heterograft is both a slalom and not flatness is wrong if it does not debar depressor.; sent3 & sent9 -> int6: the heterograft does not debar depressor.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the heterograft is both a slalom and not flatness is incorrect.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the heterograft is a flatness.; int3 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the heterograft does desecrate Wilton and is a kind of a flatness is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the heterograft does desecrate Wilton if the fact that the casing untunes Barkley and is not neolithic is wrong. sent2: if the crofter is branchial then it is neolithic. sent3: if the fact that the heterograft is typical and is not a psychrometer is wrong then it does not debar depressor. sent4: that something is a kind of a slalom but it is not flatness is false if it does not debar depressor. sent5: if the fact that something slaloms and is not flatness is not right it is flatness. sent6: something does debar depressor if the fact that it is neolithic and does not debar depressor is not right. sent7: if that the casing is branchial but it does not untune Barkley is incorrect it does untune Barkley. sent8: the crofter is branchial. sent9: that the heterograft is typical thing that is not a kind of a psychrometer is false. sent10: if the crofter is neolithic that the fact that the casing untunes Barkley but it is not neolithic is wrong hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the crofter is neolithic is right.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that that the casing does untune Barkley but it is not neolithic does not hold is not wrong.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the heterograft does desecrate Wilton is not incorrect.; sent5 -> int4: the heterograft is a flatness if that it is a kind of a slalom and it is not a kind of a flatness does not hold.; sent4 -> int5: that the heterograft is both a slalom and not flatness is wrong if it does not debar depressor.; sent3 & sent9 -> int6: the heterograft does not debar depressor.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the heterograft is both a slalom and not flatness is incorrect.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the heterograft is a flatness.; int3 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__