the banking proctor does not occur.
sent1: that the Salvadoranness occurs is not wrong. sent2: that the unholiness and the non-incidentness occurs is wrong if that the ejecting does not occur is true. sent3: not the impeding semanticist but the incident happens if the unholiness does not occur. sent4: the custodianship does not occur but the Caesarianness occurs. sent5: that the feature does not occur and the sartorialness does not occur causes that the banking proctor does not occur. sent6: if the allopatricness happens then the bonanza happens. sent7: the bonanza occurs if the fact that the non-allopatricness and the isolationistness happens does not hold. sent8: if the bonanza occurs then the venipuncture occurs. sent9: the fact that the allopatricness and the isolationistness happens does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the Chadian happens is not false the ejecting does not occur and the Salvadoran happens. sent11: if the Chadianness does not occur then the Salvadoran occurs. sent12: the incident happens. sent13: both the piaffe and the clip-clop occurs. sent14: if the venipuncture happens the banking proctor happens. sent15: that the Chadian does not occur is not false. sent16: if the fact that both the non-Ephesianness and the non-sartorialness occurs is not true then the Ephesianness happens. sent17: the feature happens if the non-allopatricness and the isolationistness occurs. sent18: that the feature does not occur is prevented by that the allopatricness and the isolationistness occurs. sent19: the unholiness does not occur. sent20: if the Chadianness does not occur then the Salvadoran occurs and the ejecting occurs. sent21: the sartorialness does not occur if the feature occurs. sent22: the fact that the incidentness does not occur is not right if the unholiness does not occur. sent23: the allopatricness does not occur. sent24: if the ejecting happens that the impeding semanticist does not occur and the sartorialness does not occur is incorrect. sent25: that not the incidentness but the venipuncture happens is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the allopatricness but the isolationist occurs.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the feature occurs.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: that the sartorialness does not occur is correct.; sent3 & sent19 -> int3: not the impeding semanticist but the incidentness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the impeding semanticist does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the impeding semanticist does not occur and the sartorialness does not occur.; sent20 & sent15 -> int6: the Salvadoranness happens and the ejecting occurs.; int6 -> int7: the ejecting happens.; sent24 & int7 -> int8: that the impeding semanticist does not occur and the sartorialness does not occur is incorrect.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the fact that the allopatricness does not occur and the isolationistness happens hold does not hold.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the bonanza occurs.; int11 & sent8 -> int12: that the venipuncture occurs is not wrong.; int12 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the banking proctor does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the banking proctor does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Salvadoranness occurs is not wrong. sent2: that the unholiness and the non-incidentness occurs is wrong if that the ejecting does not occur is true. sent3: not the impeding semanticist but the incident happens if the unholiness does not occur. sent4: the custodianship does not occur but the Caesarianness occurs. sent5: that the feature does not occur and the sartorialness does not occur causes that the banking proctor does not occur. sent6: if the allopatricness happens then the bonanza happens. sent7: the bonanza occurs if the fact that the non-allopatricness and the isolationistness happens does not hold. sent8: if the bonanza occurs then the venipuncture occurs. sent9: the fact that the allopatricness and the isolationistness happens does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the Chadian happens is not false the ejecting does not occur and the Salvadoran happens. sent11: if the Chadianness does not occur then the Salvadoran occurs. sent12: the incident happens. sent13: both the piaffe and the clip-clop occurs. sent14: if the venipuncture happens the banking proctor happens. sent15: that the Chadian does not occur is not false. sent16: if the fact that both the non-Ephesianness and the non-sartorialness occurs is not true then the Ephesianness happens. sent17: the feature happens if the non-allopatricness and the isolationistness occurs. sent18: that the feature does not occur is prevented by that the allopatricness and the isolationistness occurs. sent19: the unholiness does not occur. sent20: if the Chadianness does not occur then the Salvadoran occurs and the ejecting occurs. sent21: the sartorialness does not occur if the feature occurs. sent22: the fact that the incidentness does not occur is not right if the unholiness does not occur. sent23: the allopatricness does not occur. sent24: if the ejecting happens that the impeding semanticist does not occur and the sartorialness does not occur is incorrect. sent25: that not the incidentness but the venipuncture happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the allopatricness but the isolationist occurs.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the feature occurs.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: that the sartorialness does not occur is correct.; sent3 & sent19 -> int3: not the impeding semanticist but the incidentness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the impeding semanticist does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the impeding semanticist does not occur and the sartorialness does not occur.; sent20 & sent15 -> int6: the Salvadoranness happens and the ejecting occurs.; int6 -> int7: the ejecting happens.; sent24 & int7 -> int8: that the impeding semanticist does not occur and the sartorialness does not occur is incorrect.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the fact that the allopatricness does not occur and the isolationistness happens hold does not hold.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the bonanza occurs.; int11 & sent8 -> int12: that the venipuncture occurs is not wrong.; int12 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__