the grazier is a carful.
sent1: the manifold does caucus hulking if the fact that the wildcatter caucus hulking is right. sent2: the cake does not cover dengue. sent3: the fact that either the cybernaut queens management or it is blastocoelic or both does not hold if the grazier is not a kind of a carful. sent4: if the cybernaut does cover dengue but it is not a carful then the grazier is not a kind of a carful. sent5: the grazier is blastocoelic. sent6: the wildcatter caucuses hulking and is not a kind of a racerunner if it is not unlikely. sent7: if the fact that the cybernaut is a carful or does not cover dengue or both is false the grazier does not queen management. sent8: the cake is not multilateral if that either the cybernaut is homocercal or it covers dengue or both does not hold. sent9: the Burton is fungicidal if it is non-literal. sent10: if there is something such that it is not multilateral the cake is homocercal and it is multilingual. sent11: that the grazier does not queen management hold if the cybernaut is not homocercal. sent12: the wildcatter is not unlikely. sent13: if the cybernaut is not multilingual then that it either is homocercal or does not cover dengue or both does not hold. sent14: if that something is not a feathered or is not a gaffer or both is incorrect then it is non-multilateral. sent15: if the manifold caucuses hulking that the exercycle is either not a feathered or not a gaffer or both is wrong. sent16: the fact that the cake is not multilateral is not wrong if that the cybernaut is homocercal and/or it does not cover dengue does not hold. sent17: if something is multilingual but it does not cover dengue then the fact that it is not a carful is right. sent18: if the grazier is not multilateral the cake is not a kind of a carful. sent19: if the cybernaut does not cover dengue then that the cake is multilateral and/or it does queen management is false. sent20: if something is multilateral it is homocercal. sent21: the cake is multilateral.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grazier is not a carful.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the cybernaut queens management or it is blastocoelic or both does not hold.;
the grazier is not a carful.
sent14 -> int2: the exercycle is non-multilateral if that it does not feather or is not a kind of a gaffer or both does not hold.; sent6 & sent12 -> int3: the wildcatter caucuses hulking and is not a racerunner.; int3 -> int4: the wildcatter does caucus hulking.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the manifold caucuses hulking.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the fact that that the exercycle is not a feathered and/or it is not a gaffer hold does not hold.; int2 & int6 -> int7: the exercycle is not multilateral.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not multilateral.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the cake is homocercal and is multilingual.; int9 -> int10: the cake is multilingual.; int10 -> int11: something is multilingual.;
$hypothesis$ = the grazier is a carful. ; $context$ = sent1: the manifold does caucus hulking if the fact that the wildcatter caucus hulking is right. sent2: the cake does not cover dengue. sent3: the fact that either the cybernaut queens management or it is blastocoelic or both does not hold if the grazier is not a kind of a carful. sent4: if the cybernaut does cover dengue but it is not a carful then the grazier is not a kind of a carful. sent5: the grazier is blastocoelic. sent6: the wildcatter caucuses hulking and is not a kind of a racerunner if it is not unlikely. sent7: if the fact that the cybernaut is a carful or does not cover dengue or both is false the grazier does not queen management. sent8: the cake is not multilateral if that either the cybernaut is homocercal or it covers dengue or both does not hold. sent9: the Burton is fungicidal if it is non-literal. sent10: if there is something such that it is not multilateral the cake is homocercal and it is multilingual. sent11: that the grazier does not queen management hold if the cybernaut is not homocercal. sent12: the wildcatter is not unlikely. sent13: if the cybernaut is not multilingual then that it either is homocercal or does not cover dengue or both does not hold. sent14: if that something is not a feathered or is not a gaffer or both is incorrect then it is non-multilateral. sent15: if the manifold caucuses hulking that the exercycle is either not a feathered or not a gaffer or both is wrong. sent16: the fact that the cake is not multilateral is not wrong if that the cybernaut is homocercal and/or it does not cover dengue does not hold. sent17: if something is multilingual but it does not cover dengue then the fact that it is not a carful is right. sent18: if the grazier is not multilateral the cake is not a kind of a carful. sent19: if the cybernaut does not cover dengue then that the cake is multilateral and/or it does queen management is false. sent20: if something is multilateral it is homocercal. sent21: the cake is multilateral. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grazier is not a carful.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the cybernaut queens management or it is blastocoelic or both does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__