that the knockout is a kind of a myrtle is true.
sent1: if the authorizer is a cone the fact that it is not a Snead and it does not repine conima is false. sent2: the Cimarron is not residential. sent3: there exists something such that that either it rations or it is not intralinguistic or both is not wrong. sent4: the knockout does not repine conima. sent5: if there exists something such that that either it is a kind of a rationing or it is intralinguistic or both does not hold the authorizer is not a myrtle. sent6: that the authorizer is not a myrtle is not false if there exists something such that that either it is a kind of a rationing or it is non-intralinguistic or both is not correct. sent7: there is something such that it is intralinguistic. sent8: if the authorizer is not a myrtle then the knockout does not repine conima and is a myrtle. sent9: if the Cimarron is not residential it is a rowan and does lean Raphanus. sent10: the conima is minor or it cones or both if there exists something such that it is minor. sent11: something is minor if it is a rowan. sent12: if the authorizer is not a myrtle the fact that the knockout does not repine conima is not incorrect.
the fact that the knockout is not a myrtle is true.
sent11 -> int1: if the Cimarron is a kind of a rowan then it is minor.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the Cimarron is a rowan and it leans Raphanus.; int2 -> int3: the Cimarron is a rowan.; int1 & int3 -> int4: the Cimarron is minor.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is minor is not wrong.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: either the conima is minor or it is a cone or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the knockout is a kind of a myrtle is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the authorizer is a cone the fact that it is not a Snead and it does not repine conima is false. sent2: the Cimarron is not residential. sent3: there exists something such that that either it rations or it is not intralinguistic or both is not wrong. sent4: the knockout does not repine conima. sent5: if there exists something such that that either it is a kind of a rationing or it is intralinguistic or both does not hold the authorizer is not a myrtle. sent6: that the authorizer is not a myrtle is not false if there exists something such that that either it is a kind of a rationing or it is non-intralinguistic or both is not correct. sent7: there is something such that it is intralinguistic. sent8: if the authorizer is not a myrtle then the knockout does not repine conima and is a myrtle. sent9: if the Cimarron is not residential it is a rowan and does lean Raphanus. sent10: the conima is minor or it cones or both if there exists something such that it is minor. sent11: something is minor if it is a rowan. sent12: if the authorizer is not a myrtle the fact that the knockout does not repine conima is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__