the pandiculation is tearful and is appropriate.
sent1: that the pandiculation is incommensurate is not false. sent2: the pandiculation is incommensurate but it is not bivariate. sent3: that the pandiculation is tearful and it is yogistic is not incorrect. sent4: something is a hail and it is a Walpole if it is not incommensurate. sent5: the pandiculation is tearful if it is not bivariate. sent6: that the audiotape is inappropriate is not incorrect. sent7: if something is not a curve then the fact that it is a kind of a bluejacket hold. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not tearful the fact that the pandiculation is tearful and does appropriate does not hold. sent9: if the coca is not a fascicle then it is both bivariate and a bluejacket. sent10: the pandiculation is anoxic and it is tearful. sent11: the pandiculation is both surface-to-air and amenorrheic.
sent2 -> int1: the pandiculation is not bivariate.;
the mugger does hail and it is a Walpole if it is not incommensurate.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pandiculation is tearful and is appropriate. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pandiculation is incommensurate is not false. sent2: the pandiculation is incommensurate but it is not bivariate. sent3: that the pandiculation is tearful and it is yogistic is not incorrect. sent4: something is a hail and it is a Walpole if it is not incommensurate. sent5: the pandiculation is tearful if it is not bivariate. sent6: that the audiotape is inappropriate is not incorrect. sent7: if something is not a curve then the fact that it is a kind of a bluejacket hold. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not tearful the fact that the pandiculation is tearful and does appropriate does not hold. sent9: if the coca is not a fascicle then it is both bivariate and a bluejacket. sent10: the pandiculation is anoxic and it is tearful. sent11: the pandiculation is both surface-to-air and amenorrheic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the pandiculation is not bivariate.; __UNKNOWN__