there exists something such that if the fact that it does not cloud caitiff or it is not distributional or both is incorrect then it is not corrigible.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that either it is not unfortunate or it is not necrotic or both is incorrect it is photoemissive. sent2: the caitiff is a pithead if that it is not a Hooke or not corrigible or both is not right. sent3: there is something such that if that it is non-meretricious and/or non-onside does not hold it is not insatiate. sent4: the mangle is not a time-ball if it does not ferret swathing and/or it is not corrigible. sent5: if the fact that either something does not ferret swathing or it is not a dynamics or both is false it does not cloud putrescence. sent6: the Mordva is not a letterer if the fact that it is either not a decoration or corrigible or both is not correct. sent7: there is something such that if that it is either unprofitable or comfortable or both is incorrect then it does not wobble bassarisk. sent8: the mangle is a decoration if that it either is not a ablation or does not teem or both is not correct. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it does not ferret swathing or it is not canonic or both does not hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a phlebectomy is true. sent10: if the fact that the mangle does not cloud caitiff and/or it is not distributional is false then it is incorrigible. sent11: if that the mangle either is not Hippocratic or is not distributional or both does not hold it does ferret agglomeration. sent12: if that the mangle does not cloud caitiff and/or is not hydrolyzable does not hold it does not subtitle. sent13: there is something such that if that it either is an indication or is not olfactory or both is false then it is not direct. sent14: the mangle is not corrigible if that either it does cloud caitiff or it is not distributional or both is not correct.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it either does not ferret swathing or is not dynamics or both is false it does not cloud putrescence.
sent5 -> int1: the duff does not cloud putrescence if that it does not ferret swathing or is non-dynamics or both is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not cloud caitiff or it is not distributional or both is incorrect then it is not corrigible. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that either it is not unfortunate or it is not necrotic or both is incorrect it is photoemissive. sent2: the caitiff is a pithead if that it is not a Hooke or not corrigible or both is not right. sent3: there is something such that if that it is non-meretricious and/or non-onside does not hold it is not insatiate. sent4: the mangle is not a time-ball if it does not ferret swathing and/or it is not corrigible. sent5: if the fact that either something does not ferret swathing or it is not a dynamics or both is false it does not cloud putrescence. sent6: the Mordva is not a letterer if the fact that it is either not a decoration or corrigible or both is not correct. sent7: there is something such that if that it is either unprofitable or comfortable or both is incorrect then it does not wobble bassarisk. sent8: the mangle is a decoration if that it either is not a ablation or does not teem or both is not correct. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it does not ferret swathing or it is not canonic or both does not hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a phlebectomy is true. sent10: if the fact that the mangle does not cloud caitiff and/or it is not distributional is false then it is incorrigible. sent11: if that the mangle either is not Hippocratic or is not distributional or both does not hold it does ferret agglomeration. sent12: if that the mangle does not cloud caitiff and/or is not hydrolyzable does not hold it does not subtitle. sent13: there is something such that if that it either is an indication or is not olfactory or both is false then it is not direct. sent14: the mangle is not corrigible if that either it does cloud caitiff or it is not distributional or both is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__