the myelinization is a Condorcet.
sent1: if something is a ten the pedestrian is not a statue. sent2: the myelinization is antheridial and is not a chlorothiazide if the penne is not incapable. sent3: the fact that the adjustment is not a solitary but it is excitable is not correct if the penne does not redouble. sent4: the myelinization is a kind of a Condorcet if that it is both not non-pastoral and not raptorial is false. sent5: something is not antheridial if it is not incapable. sent6: the fact that something redoubles but it is not excitable is not correct if it is not a kind of a solitary. sent7: the adjustment is not a kind of an outfitting if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a solitary and is not a kind of a chlorothiazide is not right. sent8: the velocipede is an outfitting. sent9: if the fact that the penne does not invite inappropriateness and it is not an outfitting is wrong then it is not incapable. sent10: if that the pedestrian is a kind of an outfitting is not wrong it is antheridial. sent11: if the pedestrian is not a kind of a statue then it does not invite inappropriateness and it is an outfitting. sent12: that the adjustment is pastoral but it is not excitable is false. sent13: if the fact that something does redouble and is not excitable does not hold it is not a Condorcet. sent14: if the fact that the adjustment is both not a solitary and excitable does not hold then that the velocipede is not a chlorothiazide is not false. sent15: the fact that the pedestrian is incapable but it is not a chlorothiazide is false if the velocipede is not a chlorothiazide. sent16: there exists something such that that it does not ebb Fulton and is not a ten is not true. sent17: if the myelinization is a kind of a pastoral that is not raptorial the penne does not redouble. sent18: the pedestrian is not a statue if there is something such that that it does not ebb Fulton and it is not a kind of a ten is incorrect. sent19: that the velocipede is not a chlorothiazide and is antheridial is incorrect. sent20: the myelinization is not raptorial. sent21: the myelinization manacles gourde and is not a Siren. sent22: the pedestrian does not invite inappropriateness. sent23: something does not ebb Fulton and is not a ten. sent24: that the adjustment is both a solitary and excitable is not correct. sent25: the pedestrian does not redouble if the penne is a chlorothiazide but it is not antheridial. sent26: if the penne is a solitary then it does redouble. sent27: something is not a kind of a solitary if it is antheridial and it is not a kind of a chlorothiazide. sent28: if the pedestrian does not invite inappropriateness then that the myelinization is not a Condorcet and is excitable is wrong. sent29: that the pedestrian is a solitary but not excitable is false if the adjustment is not excitable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the myelinization is a pastoral and not raptorial.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the penne does not redouble.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the adjustment is not a solitary but it is not unexcitable is incorrect.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the velocipede is not a chlorothiazide.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the fact that the pedestrian is both incapable and not a chlorothiazide does not hold.; sent16 & sent18 -> int5: the pedestrian is not a kind of a statue.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the pedestrian does not invite inappropriateness but it is a kind of an outfitting.; int6 -> int7: the pedestrian is an outfitting.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the pedestrian is antheridial.;
the myelinization is not a Condorcet.
sent13 -> int9: if the fact that the myelinization redoubles and is not excitable is not correct it is not a Condorcet.; sent6 -> int10: the fact that the myelinization redoubles and is not excitable is incorrect if it is not a solitary.; sent27 -> int11: the myelinization is not a kind of a solitary if it is antheridial and it is not a chlorothiazide.;
$hypothesis$ = the myelinization is a Condorcet. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a ten the pedestrian is not a statue. sent2: the myelinization is antheridial and is not a chlorothiazide if the penne is not incapable. sent3: the fact that the adjustment is not a solitary but it is excitable is not correct if the penne does not redouble. sent4: the myelinization is a kind of a Condorcet if that it is both not non-pastoral and not raptorial is false. sent5: something is not antheridial if it is not incapable. sent6: the fact that something redoubles but it is not excitable is not correct if it is not a kind of a solitary. sent7: the adjustment is not a kind of an outfitting if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a solitary and is not a kind of a chlorothiazide is not right. sent8: the velocipede is an outfitting. sent9: if the fact that the penne does not invite inappropriateness and it is not an outfitting is wrong then it is not incapable. sent10: if that the pedestrian is a kind of an outfitting is not wrong it is antheridial. sent11: if the pedestrian is not a kind of a statue then it does not invite inappropriateness and it is an outfitting. sent12: that the adjustment is pastoral but it is not excitable is false. sent13: if the fact that something does redouble and is not excitable does not hold it is not a Condorcet. sent14: if the fact that the adjustment is both not a solitary and excitable does not hold then that the velocipede is not a chlorothiazide is not false. sent15: the fact that the pedestrian is incapable but it is not a chlorothiazide is false if the velocipede is not a chlorothiazide. sent16: there exists something such that that it does not ebb Fulton and is not a ten is not true. sent17: if the myelinization is a kind of a pastoral that is not raptorial the penne does not redouble. sent18: the pedestrian is not a statue if there is something such that that it does not ebb Fulton and it is not a kind of a ten is incorrect. sent19: that the velocipede is not a chlorothiazide and is antheridial is incorrect. sent20: the myelinization is not raptorial. sent21: the myelinization manacles gourde and is not a Siren. sent22: the pedestrian does not invite inappropriateness. sent23: something does not ebb Fulton and is not a ten. sent24: that the adjustment is both a solitary and excitable is not correct. sent25: the pedestrian does not redouble if the penne is a chlorothiazide but it is not antheridial. sent26: if the penne is a solitary then it does redouble. sent27: something is not a kind of a solitary if it is antheridial and it is not a kind of a chlorothiazide. sent28: if the pedestrian does not invite inappropriateness then that the myelinization is not a Condorcet and is excitable is wrong. sent29: that the pedestrian is a solitary but not excitable is false if the adjustment is not excitable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the myelinization is a pastoral and not raptorial.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the penne does not redouble.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the adjustment is not a solitary but it is not unexcitable is incorrect.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the velocipede is not a chlorothiazide.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the fact that the pedestrian is both incapable and not a chlorothiazide does not hold.; sent16 & sent18 -> int5: the pedestrian is not a kind of a statue.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the pedestrian does not invite inappropriateness but it is a kind of an outfitting.; int6 -> int7: the pedestrian is an outfitting.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the pedestrian is antheridial.; __UNKNOWN__