if the playing crampbark does not occur then not the playing Peruvian but the dust happens.
sent1: the subsidence occurs. sent2: that the immunity does not occur is right. sent3: if the puppetry and the playing Irula happens then the continuance does not occur. sent4: the fact that the unhappiness does not occur and the immunity happens is not correct if the fineness does not occur. sent5: the enforceableness happens. sent6: if the playing Peruvian occurs then that the averaging Whittle happens is not incorrect. sent7: that both the unhappiness and the immunity happens prevents the non-bathymetricness. sent8: not the dust but the hardness occurs if the enforceableness does not occur. sent9: if the hardness does not occur then the playing crampbark happens. sent10: if the playing crampbark occurs then not the playing Peruvian but the dusting happens. sent11: the bathymetricness happens if the unhappiness but not the immunity occurs. sent12: the unhappiness but not the immunity happens. sent13: the hardness does not occur if the averaging Whittle and the bathymetricness happens. sent14: the bathymetricness does not occur if the fact that not the playing crampbark but the bathymetricness happens is not true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the playing Peruvian happens.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the averaging Whittle happens.; sent11 & sent12 -> int2: the bathymetricness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the averaging Whittle and the bathymetricness happens.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the hardness does not occur is not wrong.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the playing crampbark happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the playing crampbark does not occur.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the playing Peruvian does not occur.;
that the twins occurs is not false.
$hypothesis$ = if the playing crampbark does not occur then not the playing Peruvian but the dust happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the subsidence occurs. sent2: that the immunity does not occur is right. sent3: if the puppetry and the playing Irula happens then the continuance does not occur. sent4: the fact that the unhappiness does not occur and the immunity happens is not correct if the fineness does not occur. sent5: the enforceableness happens. sent6: if the playing Peruvian occurs then that the averaging Whittle happens is not incorrect. sent7: that both the unhappiness and the immunity happens prevents the non-bathymetricness. sent8: not the dust but the hardness occurs if the enforceableness does not occur. sent9: if the hardness does not occur then the playing crampbark happens. sent10: if the playing crampbark occurs then not the playing Peruvian but the dusting happens. sent11: the bathymetricness happens if the unhappiness but not the immunity occurs. sent12: the unhappiness but not the immunity happens. sent13: the hardness does not occur if the averaging Whittle and the bathymetricness happens. sent14: the bathymetricness does not occur if the fact that not the playing crampbark but the bathymetricness happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the playing Peruvian happens.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the averaging Whittle happens.; sent11 & sent12 -> int2: the bathymetricness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the averaging Whittle and the bathymetricness happens.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the hardness does not occur is not wrong.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the playing crampbark happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the playing crampbark does not occur.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the playing Peruvian does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__