the chenfish is not shutting.
sent1: the Jihadist is a sial and is dermatologic. sent2: if the paparazzo is not a halcyon it is a whip-snake. sent3: the paparazzo is not a halcyon but it marbles LASEK. sent4: the chenfish is insecticidal if the carbonation is not destructible. sent5: a non-insecticidal thing is not destructible and is a ammoniac. sent6: the Jihadist is not a ammoniac if the fact that it is a kind of a sial and it is dermatologic is not wrong. sent7: if the Jihadist is not a kind of a ammoniac then the carbonation is not destructible. sent8: if something is shutting and numerical the chenfish is not a whip-snake. sent9: something that is not a halcyon is not non-numerical but a whip-snake. sent10: that the paparazzo is not numerical is right if there exists something such that it is insecticidal and it is shutting.
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the Jihadist is not a kind of a ammoniac.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the carbonation is not destructible.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the chenfish is insecticidal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chenfish is shutting.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the chenfish is insecticidal and it is shutting.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is a kind of insecticidal thing that is shutting.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the paparazzo is not numerical.; sent9 -> int7: the fact that the paparazzo is numerical and it is a whip-snake hold if it is not a kind of a halcyon.; sent3 -> int8: the paparazzo is not a kind of a halcyon.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the paparazzo is numerical and it is a whip-snake.; int9 -> int10: the paparazzo is numerical.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the chenfish is not destructible.
sent5 -> int12: if the chenfish is not insecticidal it is not destructible and it is a ammoniac.;
$hypothesis$ = the chenfish is not shutting. ; $context$ = sent1: the Jihadist is a sial and is dermatologic. sent2: if the paparazzo is not a halcyon it is a whip-snake. sent3: the paparazzo is not a halcyon but it marbles LASEK. sent4: the chenfish is insecticidal if the carbonation is not destructible. sent5: a non-insecticidal thing is not destructible and is a ammoniac. sent6: the Jihadist is not a ammoniac if the fact that it is a kind of a sial and it is dermatologic is not wrong. sent7: if the Jihadist is not a kind of a ammoniac then the carbonation is not destructible. sent8: if something is shutting and numerical the chenfish is not a whip-snake. sent9: something that is not a halcyon is not non-numerical but a whip-snake. sent10: that the paparazzo is not numerical is right if there exists something such that it is insecticidal and it is shutting. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the Jihadist is not a kind of a ammoniac.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the carbonation is not destructible.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the chenfish is insecticidal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chenfish is shutting.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the chenfish is insecticidal and it is shutting.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is a kind of insecticidal thing that is shutting.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the paparazzo is not numerical.; sent9 -> int7: the fact that the paparazzo is numerical and it is a whip-snake hold if it is not a kind of a halcyon.; sent3 -> int8: the paparazzo is not a kind of a halcyon.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the paparazzo is numerical and it is a whip-snake.; int9 -> int10: the paparazzo is numerical.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__