the fact that the highlighter is a kind of a showcase and/or it is a valetudinarian does not hold.
sent1: that something is a showcase or a valetudinarian or both is false if it is not a Taricha. sent2: the highlighter does not grumble Chardonnay but it is sarcolemmal if it does not stint repatriate. sent3: the fact that the highlighter is a Priacanthidae or is not caudate or both is not true. sent4: if the fact that the fact that the oligochaete is a showcase and/or chaetal is not correct hold then it is nonproprietary. sent5: everything is a kind of a artificiality. sent6: that the highlighter is a Twinkie or it is not a Mommsen or both is incorrect. sent7: the nomad is a hap or it wrestles oligochaete or both. sent8: the phyllo is ctenoid if that either it is Britannic or it does not wrestle countertransference or both does not hold. sent9: something does wrestle oligochaete if the fact that it is ctenoid and/or is not a valetudinarian is wrong. sent10: the highlighter is Britannic if the fact that it is a frontispiece and/or it is not a Cyrtomium does not hold. sent11: the highlighter wrestles oligochaete. sent12: if the fact that something is ctenoid and/or it does wrestle oligochaete does not hold then it is a showcase. sent13: there is nothing such that it is a valetudinarian and/or does not wrestle oligochaete. sent14: if the fact that the highlighter is a showcase and/or it does grumble paretic does not hold then it is a permanent. sent15: something is a kind of a showcase if that it is ctenoid and/or does not wrestle oligochaete does not hold. sent16: if something that does not grumble Chardonnay is sarcolemmal it is salvific. sent17: the highlighter is a flatlet. sent18: there is nothing such that it is ctenoid and/or it does not wrestle oligochaete. sent19: something is a roll and not a Taricha if it is salvific. sent20: either the highlighter wrestles balloon or it is ctenoid or both. sent21: something is not non-valetudinarian if the fact that it does wrestle oligochaete and/or it is not a showcase does not hold.
sent15 -> int1: if that the highlighter is ctenoid and/or does not wrestle oligochaete does not hold then it is a kind of a showcase.; sent18 -> int2: the fact that either the highlighter is ctenoid or it does not wrestle oligochaete or both is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the highlighter is a showcase.; int3 -> hypothesis;
that the highlighter is a showcase or it is a valetudinarian or both does not hold.
sent1 -> int4: the fact that the highlighter either is a showcase or is a kind of a valetudinarian or both is false if it is not a Taricha.; sent19 -> int5: the highlighter is a kind of a roll that is not a Taricha if it is salvific.; sent16 -> int6: the highlighter is salvific if it does not grumble Chardonnay and is sarcolemmal.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the highlighter is a kind of a showcase and/or it is a valetudinarian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a showcase or a valetudinarian or both is false if it is not a Taricha. sent2: the highlighter does not grumble Chardonnay but it is sarcolemmal if it does not stint repatriate. sent3: the fact that the highlighter is a Priacanthidae or is not caudate or both is not true. sent4: if the fact that the fact that the oligochaete is a showcase and/or chaetal is not correct hold then it is nonproprietary. sent5: everything is a kind of a artificiality. sent6: that the highlighter is a Twinkie or it is not a Mommsen or both is incorrect. sent7: the nomad is a hap or it wrestles oligochaete or both. sent8: the phyllo is ctenoid if that either it is Britannic or it does not wrestle countertransference or both does not hold. sent9: something does wrestle oligochaete if the fact that it is ctenoid and/or is not a valetudinarian is wrong. sent10: the highlighter is Britannic if the fact that it is a frontispiece and/or it is not a Cyrtomium does not hold. sent11: the highlighter wrestles oligochaete. sent12: if the fact that something is ctenoid and/or it does wrestle oligochaete does not hold then it is a showcase. sent13: there is nothing such that it is a valetudinarian and/or does not wrestle oligochaete. sent14: if the fact that the highlighter is a showcase and/or it does grumble paretic does not hold then it is a permanent. sent15: something is a kind of a showcase if that it is ctenoid and/or does not wrestle oligochaete does not hold. sent16: if something that does not grumble Chardonnay is sarcolemmal it is salvific. sent17: the highlighter is a flatlet. sent18: there is nothing such that it is ctenoid and/or it does not wrestle oligochaete. sent19: something is a roll and not a Taricha if it is salvific. sent20: either the highlighter wrestles balloon or it is ctenoid or both. sent21: something is not non-valetudinarian if the fact that it does wrestle oligochaete and/or it is not a showcase does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if that the highlighter is ctenoid and/or does not wrestle oligochaete does not hold then it is a kind of a showcase.; sent18 -> int2: the fact that either the highlighter is ctenoid or it does not wrestle oligochaete or both is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the highlighter is a showcase.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__