the blackmailer sneers fishnet.
sent1: that the supplement is toxicological but it is not a kind of a two-piece is not correct. sent2: the climatologist is not toxicological if the supplement is not toxicological. sent3: a progesterone sneers fishnet. sent4: the blackmailer does not sneer fishnet if the climatologist sneer fishnet and is toxicological. sent5: if that the supplement is both not non-toxicological and non-two-piece is false then that the climatologist is not non-toxicological hold. sent6: the subduer does not accompany if the climatologist is not non-Barbadian or does not sneer stripper or both. sent7: if the fact that the fact that the climatologist is Barbadian or it does not sneer stripper or both hold is wrong it is toxicological. sent8: the climatologist does sneer stripper.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the climatologist is a Barbadian and/or it does not sneer stripper is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the climatologist is toxicological.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the climatologist is not toxicological.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the climatologist is a Barbadian or does not sneer stripper or both.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the subduer does not accompany.; sent3 -> int6: the blackmailer does sneer fishnet if it is a progesterone.;
the blackmailer does not sneer fishnet.
$hypothesis$ = the blackmailer sneers fishnet. ; $context$ = sent1: that the supplement is toxicological but it is not a kind of a two-piece is not correct. sent2: the climatologist is not toxicological if the supplement is not toxicological. sent3: a progesterone sneers fishnet. sent4: the blackmailer does not sneer fishnet if the climatologist sneer fishnet and is toxicological. sent5: if that the supplement is both not non-toxicological and non-two-piece is false then that the climatologist is not non-toxicological hold. sent6: the subduer does not accompany if the climatologist is not non-Barbadian or does not sneer stripper or both. sent7: if the fact that the fact that the climatologist is Barbadian or it does not sneer stripper or both hold is wrong it is toxicological. sent8: the climatologist does sneer stripper. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the climatologist is a Barbadian and/or it does not sneer stripper is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the climatologist is toxicological.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the climatologist is not toxicological.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the climatologist is a Barbadian or does not sneer stripper or both.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the subduer does not accompany.; sent3 -> int6: the blackmailer does sneer fishnet if it is a progesterone.; __UNKNOWN__