the tagasaste is a Birmingham and not an anarchy.
sent1: the stamper is autolytic thing that is operatic. sent2: the eyelid is both operatic and not non-gustatory. sent3: the tagasaste is commutable if something that is a vacation is not a kind of a burst. sent4: something vacations. sent5: the glycerogelatin is not an anarchy. sent6: the sourdine is not commutable. sent7: there is something such that it is gustatory and it is an anarchy. sent8: the glycerogelatin is a presage. sent9: the renin is euphonic. sent10: if something that is an anarchy is not commutable then the tagasaste is a kind of a presage. sent11: the eyelid is a burst if there exists something such that it is operatic. sent12: the eyelid is Ionic if something that vacations is not a presage. sent13: there is something such that it is euphonic. sent14: if that the tagasaste is commutable and/or it is not operatic is not true the eyelid is not euphonic. sent15: the glycerogelatin is not a burst if the fact that either the eyelid is euphonic or it is not a kind of a presage or both is incorrect. sent16: that the glycerogelatin is a burst or not commutable or both hold. sent17: the neuropil does not vacation if that either the eyelid is operatic or it is not a burst or both is wrong. sent18: the glycerogelatin is Ionic and it does vacation. sent19: there is something such that it is commutable and is Ionic. sent20: the tagasaste vacations and it does award FTC. sent21: the glycerogelatin is a thirtieth or is not a kind of an anarchy or both. sent22: the tagasaste is a kind of a Birmingham and is algorithmic. sent23: the tagasaste is a Birmingham but it is not an anarchy if it is commutable. sent24: the eyelid is not operatic if it is either not non-euphonic or not a presage or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eyelid is not non-euphonic or not a presage or both.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the eyelid is not operatic.; sent2 -> int2: the eyelid is operatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the eyelid is euphonic or it is not a kind of a presage or both is not correct.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the glycerogelatin does not burst.; sent18 -> int6: the glycerogelatin does vacation.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the glycerogelatin is a kind of a vacation but it is not a burst.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a vacation and it does not burst.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the tagasaste is commutable is not incorrect.; int9 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
the neuropil is not a vacation.
$hypothesis$ = the tagasaste is a Birmingham and not an anarchy. ; $context$ = sent1: the stamper is autolytic thing that is operatic. sent2: the eyelid is both operatic and not non-gustatory. sent3: the tagasaste is commutable if something that is a vacation is not a kind of a burst. sent4: something vacations. sent5: the glycerogelatin is not an anarchy. sent6: the sourdine is not commutable. sent7: there is something such that it is gustatory and it is an anarchy. sent8: the glycerogelatin is a presage. sent9: the renin is euphonic. sent10: if something that is an anarchy is not commutable then the tagasaste is a kind of a presage. sent11: the eyelid is a burst if there exists something such that it is operatic. sent12: the eyelid is Ionic if something that vacations is not a presage. sent13: there is something such that it is euphonic. sent14: if that the tagasaste is commutable and/or it is not operatic is not true the eyelid is not euphonic. sent15: the glycerogelatin is not a burst if the fact that either the eyelid is euphonic or it is not a kind of a presage or both is incorrect. sent16: that the glycerogelatin is a burst or not commutable or both hold. sent17: the neuropil does not vacation if that either the eyelid is operatic or it is not a burst or both is wrong. sent18: the glycerogelatin is Ionic and it does vacation. sent19: there is something such that it is commutable and is Ionic. sent20: the tagasaste vacations and it does award FTC. sent21: the glycerogelatin is a thirtieth or is not a kind of an anarchy or both. sent22: the tagasaste is a kind of a Birmingham and is algorithmic. sent23: the tagasaste is a Birmingham but it is not an anarchy if it is commutable. sent24: the eyelid is not operatic if it is either not non-euphonic or not a presage or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eyelid is not non-euphonic or not a presage or both.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the eyelid is not operatic.; sent2 -> int2: the eyelid is operatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the eyelid is euphonic or it is not a kind of a presage or both is not correct.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the glycerogelatin does not burst.; sent18 -> int6: the glycerogelatin does vacation.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the glycerogelatin is a kind of a vacation but it is not a burst.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a vacation and it does not burst.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the tagasaste is commutable is not incorrect.; int9 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__