the fact that there is something such that if that it is a longhand and it is not a roost does not hold it is not physiotherapeutic is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is pyrectic then it is disobedient. sent2: something does not overuse Hinayanism if that it is a kind of revenant thing that does not overuse twenty-six is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something is a longhand and does not roost is incorrect it is not physiotherapeutic. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a longhand and it does roost is not right then that it is not physiotherapeutic is not false.
sent3 -> int1: if that the pisanosaur is a longhand that does not roost does not hold then it is not physiotherapeutic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if that the grotto is a kind of a revenant and does not overuse twenty-six is not right it does not overuse Hinayanism.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is a longhand and it is not a roost does not hold it is not physiotherapeutic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is pyrectic then it is disobedient. sent2: something does not overuse Hinayanism if that it is a kind of revenant thing that does not overuse twenty-six is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something is a longhand and does not roost is incorrect it is not physiotherapeutic. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a longhand and it does roost is not right then that it is not physiotherapeutic is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if that the pisanosaur is a longhand that does not roost does not hold then it is not physiotherapeutic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__