that there exists something such that if it is not docile and it is a jobcentre then it is not radiolucent does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not permit Rumpelstiltskin and does boot enchanter the fact that it is not a benzene hold. sent2: the fact that the Evangelist is not radiolucent is true if it is docile and a jobcentre. sent3: there is something such that if it is docile thing that is a jobcentre it is non-radiolucent. sent4: something is radiolucent if it is not docile and it is a jobcentre. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-docile a jobcentre it is radiolucent. sent6: if something is both not fascista and actinal then it is not a spinal. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a inapplicability and it is a kind of a dendrobium then it is not a buffet. sent8: there is something such that if it is both not fascista and a Sullivan it does not boot tarriance. sent9: if something is not a suavity but it is genetic then it is not a trail. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not imbibe and it permits judiciary is not incorrect it is not a Merrimack. sent11: if the Evangelist is not a huffiness but it is a Brinton it is not docile. sent12: a docile thing that is a jobcentre is not radiolucent. sent13: there is something such that if it does not trot and boots myeloblast then it does not stigmatize heterozygote. sent14: if something does not boot interferometer but it is a jobcentre it is not a Gabonese. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not permit judiciary and it is judgmental it does not abate. sent16: a non-docile thing that is a kind of a jobcentre is not radiolucent. sent17: if something is not phlegmy and does bumble shag then it does not boot lagniappe. sent18: if something is not Carthaginian and is a benzene the fact that it does not boot Samoan is right. sent19: the Evangelist is radiolucent if it is not docile and it is a jobcentre. sent20: something is not genetic if it is not docile and not non-theosophical. sent21: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Binet and buffets then it is not a kind of a bootmaker.
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the Evangelist is not radiolucent is not false if it is a kind of non-docile thing that is a kind of a jobcentre.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if that the interferometer does not boot interferometer but it is a kind of a jobcentre is not false then it is non-Gabonese.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not docile and it is a jobcentre then it is not radiolucent does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not permit Rumpelstiltskin and does boot enchanter the fact that it is not a benzene hold. sent2: the fact that the Evangelist is not radiolucent is true if it is docile and a jobcentre. sent3: there is something such that if it is docile thing that is a jobcentre it is non-radiolucent. sent4: something is radiolucent if it is not docile and it is a jobcentre. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-docile a jobcentre it is radiolucent. sent6: if something is both not fascista and actinal then it is not a spinal. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a inapplicability and it is a kind of a dendrobium then it is not a buffet. sent8: there is something such that if it is both not fascista and a Sullivan it does not boot tarriance. sent9: if something is not a suavity but it is genetic then it is not a trail. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not imbibe and it permits judiciary is not incorrect it is not a Merrimack. sent11: if the Evangelist is not a huffiness but it is a Brinton it is not docile. sent12: a docile thing that is a jobcentre is not radiolucent. sent13: there is something such that if it does not trot and boots myeloblast then it does not stigmatize heterozygote. sent14: if something does not boot interferometer but it is a jobcentre it is not a Gabonese. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not permit judiciary and it is judgmental it does not abate. sent16: a non-docile thing that is a kind of a jobcentre is not radiolucent. sent17: if something is not phlegmy and does bumble shag then it does not boot lagniappe. sent18: if something is not Carthaginian and is a benzene the fact that it does not boot Samoan is right. sent19: the Evangelist is radiolucent if it is not docile and it is a jobcentre. sent20: something is not genetic if it is not docile and not non-theosophical. sent21: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Binet and buffets then it is not a kind of a bootmaker. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the Evangelist is not radiolucent is not false if it is a kind of non-docile thing that is a kind of a jobcentre.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__