if the sociolinguist does not collogue Lucanidae then the hagfish is an expansion.
sent1: if the override is a debilitation the sociolinguist does not milk and it is not a Whitehead. sent2: if the sociolinguist is not a milk but a Whitehead then it does not expire Chamaedaphne. sent3: a Whitehead is not an expansion. sent4: if something that does not swagger is thermostatic then the fact that it does not collogue Lucanidae is true. sent5: if the fact that the jack-o-lantern is not thermostatic hold the hagfish does not swagger but it is a kind of an expansion. sent6: if something does not expire Chamaedaphne and it does not collogue Lucanidae then it does not help. sent7: the jack-o-lantern does not help and it is not a debilitation. sent8: that the jack-o-lantern is not intrinsic and it does not help is not true if the sociolinguist does not help. sent9: something does not expire Chamaedaphne if it is both not a milk and not a Whitehead. sent10: the fact that the alidade expires Chamaedaphne and does help is not true. sent11: the override is a debilitation.
sent9 -> int1: if the sociolinguist is not a milk and not a Whitehead it does not expire Chamaedaphne.; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: the sociolinguist is not a milk and it is not a Whitehead.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sociolinguist does not expire Chamaedaphne.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sociolinguist does not collogue Lucanidae.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the sociolinguist does not expire Chamaedaphne and it does not collogue Lucanidae.; sent6 -> int5: that the sociolinguist does not help is not false if it does not expire Chamaedaphne and does not collogue Lucanidae.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the sociolinguist does not help.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the jack-o-lantern is a kind of non-intrinsic thing that does not help is not right.;
that the override does not expire decumary and does not impregnate is right.
sent10 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it does expire Chamaedaphne and does help is false.;
$hypothesis$ = if the sociolinguist does not collogue Lucanidae then the hagfish is an expansion. ; $context$ = sent1: if the override is a debilitation the sociolinguist does not milk and it is not a Whitehead. sent2: if the sociolinguist is not a milk but a Whitehead then it does not expire Chamaedaphne. sent3: a Whitehead is not an expansion. sent4: if something that does not swagger is thermostatic then the fact that it does not collogue Lucanidae is true. sent5: if the fact that the jack-o-lantern is not thermostatic hold the hagfish does not swagger but it is a kind of an expansion. sent6: if something does not expire Chamaedaphne and it does not collogue Lucanidae then it does not help. sent7: the jack-o-lantern does not help and it is not a debilitation. sent8: that the jack-o-lantern is not intrinsic and it does not help is not true if the sociolinguist does not help. sent9: something does not expire Chamaedaphne if it is both not a milk and not a Whitehead. sent10: the fact that the alidade expires Chamaedaphne and does help is not true. sent11: the override is a debilitation. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the sociolinguist is not a milk and not a Whitehead it does not expire Chamaedaphne.; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: the sociolinguist is not a milk and it is not a Whitehead.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sociolinguist does not expire Chamaedaphne.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sociolinguist does not collogue Lucanidae.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the sociolinguist does not expire Chamaedaphne and it does not collogue Lucanidae.; sent6 -> int5: that the sociolinguist does not help is not false if it does not expire Chamaedaphne and does not collogue Lucanidae.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the sociolinguist does not help.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the jack-o-lantern is a kind of non-intrinsic thing that does not help is not right.; __UNKNOWN__