the angioplasty does not occur.
sent1: the immortalizing perseveration happens. sent2: that the ankyloticness does not occur and the straight-arm happens is caused by that the seigneury does not occur. sent3: the cooing cytologist occurs if the maltreatment occurs. sent4: if that the nebulousness does not occur and the immortalizing perseveration does not occur is not right the aromaticness does not occur. sent5: the harmfulness occurs if the lexicostatisticsness happens. sent6: that the nebulousness but not the immortalizing perseveration occurs is incorrect. sent7: the programing does not occur and the immortalizing diet does not occur. sent8: the cooing cytologist does not occur if that the archaizing occurs and the dash occurs is not right. sent9: the flicking occurs. sent10: the fact that the nebulousness does not occur but the immortalizing perseveration occurs is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the aromaticness does not occur is not incorrect the maltreatment happens. sent12: that if the ankyloticness does not occur that the archaizing and the dash occurs is not correct is not false. sent13: the lexicalness does not occur if that the immortalizing acrylamide does not occur and the optativeness does not occur is false. sent14: the ribbing touch-typist does not occur. sent15: the angioplasty occurs if that the cooing cytologist does not occur is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nebulousness does not occur and the immortalizing perseveration does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the immortalizing perseveration does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the nebulousness does not occur and the immortalizing perseveration does not occur is incorrect.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the aromaticness does not occur.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the maltreatment occurs.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the cooing cytologist happens.; sent15 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the angioplasty does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the angioplasty does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the immortalizing perseveration happens. sent2: that the ankyloticness does not occur and the straight-arm happens is caused by that the seigneury does not occur. sent3: the cooing cytologist occurs if the maltreatment occurs. sent4: if that the nebulousness does not occur and the immortalizing perseveration does not occur is not right the aromaticness does not occur. sent5: the harmfulness occurs if the lexicostatisticsness happens. sent6: that the nebulousness but not the immortalizing perseveration occurs is incorrect. sent7: the programing does not occur and the immortalizing diet does not occur. sent8: the cooing cytologist does not occur if that the archaizing occurs and the dash occurs is not right. sent9: the flicking occurs. sent10: the fact that the nebulousness does not occur but the immortalizing perseveration occurs is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the aromaticness does not occur is not incorrect the maltreatment happens. sent12: that if the ankyloticness does not occur that the archaizing and the dash occurs is not correct is not false. sent13: the lexicalness does not occur if that the immortalizing acrylamide does not occur and the optativeness does not occur is false. sent14: the ribbing touch-typist does not occur. sent15: the angioplasty occurs if that the cooing cytologist does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nebulousness does not occur and the immortalizing perseveration does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the immortalizing perseveration does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the nebulousness does not occur and the immortalizing perseveration does not occur is incorrect.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the aromaticness does not occur.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the maltreatment occurs.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the cooing cytologist happens.; sent15 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__