something is not a reticule and is not prejudicial.
sent1: if the part-owner is photosynthetic and it is capable the crocolite adheres Joliot. sent2: the paralytic is not a kind of a deer. sent3: if something is not a deer and it does not relieve then the fact that it is not photosynthetic is true. sent4: the crocolite does adhere Joliot if the part-owner is not photosynthetic but it is not incapable. sent5: if the paralytic is not photosynthetic then the part-owner is not photosynthetic. sent6: if the fact that the balsa is a Marines is right then it is not a kind of a reticule and it is not prejudicial. sent7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a reticule and it is prejudicial. sent8: the balsa is a kind of a Marines if it is not a kind of a unrelatedness and does not adhere Joliot. sent9: that the crocolite is not a reticule is true. sent10: the balsa is not a unrelatedness and does not adhere Joliot if the fact that the crocolite does adhere Joliot is true. sent11: the balsa is not a reticule if that it is a Marines hold. sent12: the balsa does not adhere Joliot. sent13: there exists something such that it is not prejudicial. sent14: everything is not a deer and does not relieve. sent15: something is nonphotosynthetic if it is a deer that does not relieve. sent16: the balsa is a Marines if it is not a kind of a unrelatedness and does adhere Joliot. sent17: the part-owner is not a Constance and is a reticule.
sent14 -> int1: the paralytic is not a deer and does not relieve.; sent3 -> int2: if the paralytic is not a kind of a deer and does not relieve it is not photosynthetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the paralytic is not photosynthetic.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not a reticule and is not prejudicial. ; $context$ = sent1: if the part-owner is photosynthetic and it is capable the crocolite adheres Joliot. sent2: the paralytic is not a kind of a deer. sent3: if something is not a deer and it does not relieve then the fact that it is not photosynthetic is true. sent4: the crocolite does adhere Joliot if the part-owner is not photosynthetic but it is not incapable. sent5: if the paralytic is not photosynthetic then the part-owner is not photosynthetic. sent6: if the fact that the balsa is a Marines is right then it is not a kind of a reticule and it is not prejudicial. sent7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a reticule and it is prejudicial. sent8: the balsa is a kind of a Marines if it is not a kind of a unrelatedness and does not adhere Joliot. sent9: that the crocolite is not a reticule is true. sent10: the balsa is not a unrelatedness and does not adhere Joliot if the fact that the crocolite does adhere Joliot is true. sent11: the balsa is not a reticule if that it is a Marines hold. sent12: the balsa does not adhere Joliot. sent13: there exists something such that it is not prejudicial. sent14: everything is not a deer and does not relieve. sent15: something is nonphotosynthetic if it is a deer that does not relieve. sent16: the balsa is a Marines if it is not a kind of a unrelatedness and does adhere Joliot. sent17: the part-owner is not a Constance and is a reticule. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the paralytic is not a deer and does not relieve.; sent3 -> int2: if the paralytic is not a kind of a deer and does not relieve it is not photosynthetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the paralytic is not photosynthetic.; __UNKNOWN__