the bridgehead is not a kind of an amplitude if the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae.
sent1: the bridgehead is not an amplitude if that the copilot does sequence Chrysopidae is right. sent2: that the copilot is a kind of a pipe and is not a Kazakhstani does not hold if the bridgehead is a frond. sent3: the adrenosterone is an amplitude if the bridgehead is non-glycogenic. sent4: if something does not sequence Chrysopidae and/or it does not sequence bridgehead then it does not sequence Chrysopidae. sent5: if something is a kind of a Kazakhstani it is not glycogenic. sent6: if that the adrenosterone is a kind of an affinity is not incorrect then it is glycogenic. sent7: the fact that the copilot is a pipe but not non-Kazakhstani is false. sent8: that the adrenosterone is glycogenic but not Kazakhstani does not hold if there are Kazakhstani things. sent9: if the copilot is a Kazakhstani then it is not glycogenic. sent10: if the bridgehead is not a frond then it is not an amplitude. sent11: the adrenosterone is a frond if the bridgehead is glycogenic and/or does not sequence Chrysopidae. sent12: if that something is a pipe and not a Kazakhstani is not true then it is not glycogenic. sent13: if the bridgehead is not a frond the fact that it is an amplitude is true. sent14: the fact that the copilot does pipe and it is a Kazakhstani does not hold if the bridgehead is a frond. sent15: that the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae and is not glycogenic is not right if there is something such that it is glycogenic. sent16: the adrenosterone is an affinity. sent17: the bridgehead is an amplitude if the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bridgehead is a frond.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the copilot is a kind of a pipe but it is not Kazakhstani is not true.; sent12 -> int2: if that the copilot is a kind of a pipe and is not a Kazakhstani does not hold then it is not glycogenic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the copilot is not glycogenic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae and is not glycogenic.; sent6 & sent16 -> int5: the adrenosterone is glycogenic.; int5 -> int6: something is glycogenic.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the fact that the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae and is not glycogenic is not correct.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: the bridgehead is not a kind of a frond.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the bridgehead is not a kind of an amplitude.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the adrenosterone is an amplitude.
sent4 -> int11: if either the bridgehead does not sequence Chrysopidae or it does not sequence bridgehead or both it does not sequence Chrysopidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the bridgehead is not a kind of an amplitude if the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the bridgehead is not an amplitude if that the copilot does sequence Chrysopidae is right. sent2: that the copilot is a kind of a pipe and is not a Kazakhstani does not hold if the bridgehead is a frond. sent3: the adrenosterone is an amplitude if the bridgehead is non-glycogenic. sent4: if something does not sequence Chrysopidae and/or it does not sequence bridgehead then it does not sequence Chrysopidae. sent5: if something is a kind of a Kazakhstani it is not glycogenic. sent6: if that the adrenosterone is a kind of an affinity is not incorrect then it is glycogenic. sent7: the fact that the copilot is a pipe but not non-Kazakhstani is false. sent8: that the adrenosterone is glycogenic but not Kazakhstani does not hold if there are Kazakhstani things. sent9: if the copilot is a Kazakhstani then it is not glycogenic. sent10: if the bridgehead is not a frond then it is not an amplitude. sent11: the adrenosterone is a frond if the bridgehead is glycogenic and/or does not sequence Chrysopidae. sent12: if that something is a pipe and not a Kazakhstani is not true then it is not glycogenic. sent13: if the bridgehead is not a frond the fact that it is an amplitude is true. sent14: the fact that the copilot does pipe and it is a Kazakhstani does not hold if the bridgehead is a frond. sent15: that the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae and is not glycogenic is not right if there is something such that it is glycogenic. sent16: the adrenosterone is an affinity. sent17: the bridgehead is an amplitude if the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bridgehead is a frond.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the copilot is a kind of a pipe but it is not Kazakhstani is not true.; sent12 -> int2: if that the copilot is a kind of a pipe and is not a Kazakhstani does not hold then it is not glycogenic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the copilot is not glycogenic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae and is not glycogenic.; sent6 & sent16 -> int5: the adrenosterone is glycogenic.; int5 -> int6: something is glycogenic.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the fact that the copilot does not sequence Chrysopidae and is not glycogenic is not correct.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: the bridgehead is not a kind of a frond.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the bridgehead is not a kind of an amplitude.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__