the equine is not a Tayalic.
sent1: if something does not mistake pique the fact that it either is not monotypic or is a Namoi or both does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the equine is not acquisitive but it is extracellular is true then it torments crowning. sent3: the dugout does not mistake pique if the whiskey does not mistake pique or it does not torment crowning or both. sent4: if the turbulence is a kind of non-pediatrics thing that does mistake decolonization then the fact that it is a Sikh hold. sent5: if that something is not monotypic or it is a Namoi or both is not correct it is a patter. sent6: if something mistakes pique and it does torment crowning then it is not a Tayalic. sent7: something torments crowning but it does not mistake pique if it does patter. sent8: the equine is not acquisitive but it is extracellular.
sent1 -> int1: that the equine is non-monotypic and/or is a Namoi does not hold if it does not mistake pique.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the equine does not mistake pique.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the equine is not monotypic and/or is a Namoi is not correct.; sent5 -> int3: if that either the equine is not monotypic or it is a Namoi or both is false then it patters.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the equine is a kind of a patter.; sent2 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the equine does torment crowning hold.; sent6 -> int6: the equine is not a kind of a Tayalic if it mistakes pique and does torment crowning.;
the equine is a Tayalic.
$hypothesis$ = the equine is not a Tayalic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not mistake pique the fact that it either is not monotypic or is a Namoi or both does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the equine is not acquisitive but it is extracellular is true then it torments crowning. sent3: the dugout does not mistake pique if the whiskey does not mistake pique or it does not torment crowning or both. sent4: if the turbulence is a kind of non-pediatrics thing that does mistake decolonization then the fact that it is a Sikh hold. sent5: if that something is not monotypic or it is a Namoi or both is not correct it is a patter. sent6: if something mistakes pique and it does torment crowning then it is not a Tayalic. sent7: something torments crowning but it does not mistake pique if it does patter. sent8: the equine is not acquisitive but it is extracellular. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: that the equine is non-monotypic and/or is a Namoi does not hold if it does not mistake pique.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the equine does not mistake pique.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the equine is not monotypic and/or is a Namoi is not correct.; sent5 -> int3: if that either the equine is not monotypic or it is a Namoi or both is false then it patters.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the equine is a kind of a patter.; sent2 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the equine does torment crowning hold.; sent6 -> int6: the equine is not a kind of a Tayalic if it mistakes pique and does torment crowning.; __UNKNOWN__