the peptone nettles perfectionist.
sent1: the withholder is both ungrateful and a Bramidae. sent2: something is a kind of non-marmorean thing that is a kind of a feline if it does disobey Ceterach. sent3: the Soma is not a kind of a IOL if the peptone is a IOL and it does disobey Herat. sent4: the peptone nettles perfectionist and it is a kind of a Bramidae. sent5: if something is a Bramidae it does nettle perfectionist. sent6: the peptone is a IOL. sent7: if the Soma does disobey treasury then it litters. sent8: the fact that the arsenide nettles perfectionist is true. sent9: the fact that the Soma is non-microscopic thing that does not nettle Akhenaton does not hold. sent10: if the fact that something is not a burnup but a petitioner is not true it is not reversionary. sent11: the fact that the Soma is not a kind of a burnup and is a petitioner does not hold if it is not a kind of a IOL. sent12: the obeche is lineal and is wilding. sent13: the peptone is a collet and lineal. sent14: the peptone is a IOL that disobeys Herat. sent15: if something is a kind of a litter but it is not reversionary it disobeys Ceterach. sent16: something is a kind of a Bramidae if it is feline. sent17: if something is marmorean then that it is not a Bramidae and it is not feline is not right. sent18: that the Soma disobeys treasury is not wrong if the fact that it is not microscopic and it does not nettle Akhenaton is not correct.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
the peptone does not nettle perfectionist.
sent17 -> int1: if the diamagnetism is marmorean then that it is not a kind of a Bramidae and it is not a feline does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the peptone nettles perfectionist. ; $context$ = sent1: the withholder is both ungrateful and a Bramidae. sent2: something is a kind of non-marmorean thing that is a kind of a feline if it does disobey Ceterach. sent3: the Soma is not a kind of a IOL if the peptone is a IOL and it does disobey Herat. sent4: the peptone nettles perfectionist and it is a kind of a Bramidae. sent5: if something is a Bramidae it does nettle perfectionist. sent6: the peptone is a IOL. sent7: if the Soma does disobey treasury then it litters. sent8: the fact that the arsenide nettles perfectionist is true. sent9: the fact that the Soma is non-microscopic thing that does not nettle Akhenaton does not hold. sent10: if the fact that something is not a burnup but a petitioner is not true it is not reversionary. sent11: the fact that the Soma is not a kind of a burnup and is a petitioner does not hold if it is not a kind of a IOL. sent12: the obeche is lineal and is wilding. sent13: the peptone is a collet and lineal. sent14: the peptone is a IOL that disobeys Herat. sent15: if something is a kind of a litter but it is not reversionary it disobeys Ceterach. sent16: something is a kind of a Bramidae if it is feline. sent17: if something is marmorean then that it is not a Bramidae and it is not feline is not right. sent18: that the Soma disobeys treasury is not wrong if the fact that it is not microscopic and it does not nettle Akhenaton is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__