that the muezzin is a dialectic and it jars legs does not hold.
sent1: the glaciation does not emend meatloaf. sent2: if that the glaciation either does jar scorer or is dysphemistic or both does not hold then it does not jar legs. sent3: that the muezzin is a kind of a dialectic and it does jar legs does not hold if that the glaciation does not jar legs is not wrong. sent4: that the glaciation does jar scorer and/or is dysphemistic is incorrect. sent5: the fact that that the glaciation is dysphemistic and it is a dialectic is false is right if the muezzin is not dialectic.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the glaciation does not jar legs.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the muezzin is a dialectic and it jars legs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the glaciation does not emend meatloaf. sent2: if that the glaciation either does jar scorer or is dysphemistic or both does not hold then it does not jar legs. sent3: that the muezzin is a kind of a dialectic and it does jar legs does not hold if that the glaciation does not jar legs is not wrong. sent4: that the glaciation does jar scorer and/or is dysphemistic is incorrect. sent5: the fact that that the glaciation is dysphemistic and it is a dialectic is false is right if the muezzin is not dialectic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the glaciation does not jar legs.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__