there exists something such that if it does not mark archespore and it is not a clot then it is zygotic.
sent1: if something is not economic and it does not mark bronco it is a kind of a galea. sent2: if the fact that the lender does mark archespore but it is not a clot is right it is zygotic. sent3: there exists something such that if it marshals lender and is not ascosporic then it is a kind of a celeriac. sent4: if the lender does not mark archespore but it marshals income then the fact that it is a idiopathy is not incorrect. sent5: if the lender does not mark archespore and it is not a clot it is zygotic. sent6: there is something such that if it does number and it is not a kind of a irreligionist it is ambitious.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is not economic and does not mark bronco is not false it is a galea.
sent1 -> int1: if the honker is not economic and it does not mark bronco it is a kind of a galea.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not mark archespore and it is not a clot then it is zygotic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not economic and it does not mark bronco it is a kind of a galea. sent2: if the fact that the lender does mark archespore but it is not a clot is right it is zygotic. sent3: there exists something such that if it marshals lender and is not ascosporic then it is a kind of a celeriac. sent4: if the lender does not mark archespore but it marshals income then the fact that it is a idiopathy is not incorrect. sent5: if the lender does not mark archespore and it is not a clot it is zygotic. sent6: there is something such that if it does number and it is not a kind of a irreligionist it is ambitious. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__