the emmer is unnecessary.
sent1: the surety is not bromidic if either the coreligionist enfeoffs nephropathy or it is not characteristic or both. sent2: the emmer does enfeoff nephropathy and is not sectorial. sent3: the poet is not rabid if the fact that it is rabid and it creams moquette is not correct. sent4: the emmer does not enfeoff nephropathy if the coreligionist is not unnecessary. sent5: the emmer is a kind of a swerve but it is not bromidic if the surety is not bromidic. sent6: the coreligionist is bromidic if the surety does not enfeoff nephropathy. sent7: if something starts reservist the fact that it does not scourge and it is earthly is false. sent8: if the surety rhymes then the fact that the emmer is not a swerve and it is not bromidic does not hold. sent9: the fact that everything enfeoffs nephropathy or is not a characteristic or both is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the poet is rabid and it creams moquette is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the bedwetter does not scourge but it is earthly does not hold the surety does rhyme. sent12: if the emmer is not bromidic it does not rhyme and it is unnecessary.
sent9 -> int1: the coreligionist does enfeoff nephropathy and/or it is not a characteristic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the surety is not bromidic.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the emmer is a swerve but it is non-bromidic.; int3 -> int4: the emmer is not bromidic.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the emmer does not rhyme and is unnecessary.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the emmer is not unnecessary is true.
sent7 -> int6: if the bedwetter does start reservist then the fact that it is not a kind of a scourge and is earthly is incorrect.; sent3 & sent10 -> int7: the poet is not rabid.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not rabid.;
$hypothesis$ = the emmer is unnecessary. ; $context$ = sent1: the surety is not bromidic if either the coreligionist enfeoffs nephropathy or it is not characteristic or both. sent2: the emmer does enfeoff nephropathy and is not sectorial. sent3: the poet is not rabid if the fact that it is rabid and it creams moquette is not correct. sent4: the emmer does not enfeoff nephropathy if the coreligionist is not unnecessary. sent5: the emmer is a kind of a swerve but it is not bromidic if the surety is not bromidic. sent6: the coreligionist is bromidic if the surety does not enfeoff nephropathy. sent7: if something starts reservist the fact that it does not scourge and it is earthly is false. sent8: if the surety rhymes then the fact that the emmer is not a swerve and it is not bromidic does not hold. sent9: the fact that everything enfeoffs nephropathy or is not a characteristic or both is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the poet is rabid and it creams moquette is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the bedwetter does not scourge but it is earthly does not hold the surety does rhyme. sent12: if the emmer is not bromidic it does not rhyme and it is unnecessary. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the coreligionist does enfeoff nephropathy and/or it is not a characteristic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the surety is not bromidic.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the emmer is a swerve but it is non-bromidic.; int3 -> int4: the emmer is not bromidic.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the emmer does not rhyme and is unnecessary.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__