there exists something such that if it overtakes then it is a kind of a florist.
sent1: there is something such that if it does bead it is apoplectic. sent2: if something that does not bark soapwort is not a newsreel it does twine illness. sent3: there is something such that if it does twine rough it is nonextant. sent4: the pepper-and-salt overtakes. sent5: if the deflector does huddle then the soapwort is unobvious and insoluble. sent6: something does not marshal if it does not bark sextet. sent7: the deflector does not bark macrotus. sent8: the fact that something does not twine picometer and is not a nakedwood is not true if it is not soluble. sent9: if something does not overtake then it does facilitate Fallot and/or it is a florist. sent10: if the wordfinder does facilitate Fallot then the protoplasm does facilitate Fallot. sent11: the heifer is not a modeling. sent12: if the fact that the heifer does not facilitate Fallot is not wrong the antidote is not a newsreel. sent13: The soapwort does not bark pepper-and-salt. sent14: the deflector is indigestible and it is a huddle if it does not bark macrotus. sent15: the contents is not a florist. sent16: the heifer is a cowherb if it is a kind of a newsreel. sent17: if the wordfinder is a kind of a florist then the protoplasm does facilitate Fallot. sent18: if something does not bark soapwort then that it does not facilitate Fallot hold. sent19: something is a kind of an avocation if it is a kind of thallophytic thing that does not bark prohibition. sent20: if the pepper-and-salt does twine illness then the antidote does not twine illness. sent21: if the protoplasm facilitates Fallot then the pepper-and-salt does not bark soapwort and it is not a newsreel. sent22: the heifer is not a kind of a florist. sent23: the pepper-and-salt is not cyclopean. sent24: if something that does overtake is not a newsreel then it is a florist. sent25: the fact that the heifer barks soapwort is false if the pepper-and-salt does not barks soapwort.
sent18 -> int1: if the heifer does not bark soapwort then it does not facilitate Fallot.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antidote does overtake.; sent24 -> int2: if the antidote overtakes but it is not a newsreel then it is a kind of a florist.;
the antidote does not twine illness.
sent2 -> int3: the pepper-and-salt does twine illness if it does not bark soapwort and is not a newsreel.; sent9 -> int4: either the wordfinder facilitates Fallot or it is a florist or both if it does not overtake.; sent8 -> int5: that the fact that the soapwort does not twine picometer and is not a nakedwood is false is not false if it is not soluble.; sent14 & sent7 -> int6: the deflector is indigestible thing that is a huddle.; int6 -> int7: the deflector is a huddle.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the soapwort is unobvious but it is not soluble.; int8 -> int9: the soapwort is not soluble.; int5 & int9 -> int10: that the soapwort does not twine picometer and it is not a nakedwood is not right.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not twine picometer and is not a nakedwood is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it overtakes then it is a kind of a florist. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does bead it is apoplectic. sent2: if something that does not bark soapwort is not a newsreel it does twine illness. sent3: there is something such that if it does twine rough it is nonextant. sent4: the pepper-and-salt overtakes. sent5: if the deflector does huddle then the soapwort is unobvious and insoluble. sent6: something does not marshal if it does not bark sextet. sent7: the deflector does not bark macrotus. sent8: the fact that something does not twine picometer and is not a nakedwood is not true if it is not soluble. sent9: if something does not overtake then it does facilitate Fallot and/or it is a florist. sent10: if the wordfinder does facilitate Fallot then the protoplasm does facilitate Fallot. sent11: the heifer is not a modeling. sent12: if the fact that the heifer does not facilitate Fallot is not wrong the antidote is not a newsreel. sent13: The soapwort does not bark pepper-and-salt. sent14: the deflector is indigestible and it is a huddle if it does not bark macrotus. sent15: the contents is not a florist. sent16: the heifer is a cowherb if it is a kind of a newsreel. sent17: if the wordfinder is a kind of a florist then the protoplasm does facilitate Fallot. sent18: if something does not bark soapwort then that it does not facilitate Fallot hold. sent19: something is a kind of an avocation if it is a kind of thallophytic thing that does not bark prohibition. sent20: if the pepper-and-salt does twine illness then the antidote does not twine illness. sent21: if the protoplasm facilitates Fallot then the pepper-and-salt does not bark soapwort and it is not a newsreel. sent22: the heifer is not a kind of a florist. sent23: the pepper-and-salt is not cyclopean. sent24: if something that does overtake is not a newsreel then it is a florist. sent25: the fact that the heifer barks soapwort is false if the pepper-and-salt does not barks soapwort. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: if the heifer does not bark soapwort then it does not facilitate Fallot.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antidote does overtake.; sent24 -> int2: if the antidote overtakes but it is not a newsreel then it is a kind of a florist.; __UNKNOWN__