that the lamprey does not eulogize Mitchum and it is not hospitable is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the lamprey does not eulogize Mitchum and it is not hospitable is not true if the Newtonian does not tat. sent2: the batfish is a kind of legitimate thing that is a Oedipus. sent3: if that the Newtonian is a zap but not a soldierfish does not hold then that the batfish legitimates is wrong. sent4: if something does not tat then that it is a Silurian is not wrong. sent5: that the Newtonian is a zap but it is not a soldierfish is not true if it tats.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Newtonian tats.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the Newtonian is a zap and is not a soldierfish is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the batfish does not legitimate.; sent2 -> int3: the batfish legitimates.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Newtonian does not tat.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the ironman is a Silurian and it renders Adonic.
sent4 -> int6: the ironman is a Silurian if it does not tat.;
$hypothesis$ = that the lamprey does not eulogize Mitchum and it is not hospitable is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the lamprey does not eulogize Mitchum and it is not hospitable is not true if the Newtonian does not tat. sent2: the batfish is a kind of legitimate thing that is a Oedipus. sent3: if that the Newtonian is a zap but not a soldierfish does not hold then that the batfish legitimates is wrong. sent4: if something does not tat then that it is a Silurian is not wrong. sent5: that the Newtonian is a zap but it is not a soldierfish is not true if it tats. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Newtonian tats.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the Newtonian is a zap and is not a soldierfish is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the batfish does not legitimate.; sent2 -> int3: the batfish legitimates.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Newtonian does not tat.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__