the fact that the antitoxin is a linseed but it is not a gallop is not right.
sent1: if the grits is a minge that the di-iodotyrosine is a Trombiculidae and is not skeletal does not hold. sent2: the antitoxin is a playback if it is not a purulence and is a plage. sent3: that the caracal is ergotic but it is not a miterwort is not right if it is a gallop. sent4: the caracal is a gallop if it is a linseed. sent5: if the antitoxin is a purulence and is a plage then it is a playback. sent6: if that the antitoxin is a playback is correct then it is ergotic. sent7: something is not a purulence but it is a plage if it is a minge. sent8: the grits is not a miterwort. sent9: the fact that the fact that the antitoxin is a linseed but not the gallop is wrong if the antitoxin is not a kind of a minge is correct. sent10: if the antitoxin is ergotic then the grits is a miterwort.
sent7 -> int1: the antitoxin is not a purulence but it is a plage if it is a kind of a minge.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antitoxin is a minge.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the antitoxin is not a kind of a purulence but it is a plage.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the antitoxin is a kind of a playback.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the antitoxin is ergotic.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the grits is a miterwort.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the antitoxin is not a minge.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the di-iodotyrosine is a Trombiculidae but it is not skeletal is correct does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the antitoxin is a linseed but it is not a gallop is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the grits is a minge that the di-iodotyrosine is a Trombiculidae and is not skeletal does not hold. sent2: the antitoxin is a playback if it is not a purulence and is a plage. sent3: that the caracal is ergotic but it is not a miterwort is not right if it is a gallop. sent4: the caracal is a gallop if it is a linseed. sent5: if the antitoxin is a purulence and is a plage then it is a playback. sent6: if that the antitoxin is a playback is correct then it is ergotic. sent7: something is not a purulence but it is a plage if it is a minge. sent8: the grits is not a miterwort. sent9: the fact that the fact that the antitoxin is a linseed but not the gallop is wrong if the antitoxin is not a kind of a minge is correct. sent10: if the antitoxin is ergotic then the grits is a miterwort. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the antitoxin is not a purulence but it is a plage if it is a kind of a minge.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antitoxin is a minge.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the antitoxin is not a kind of a purulence but it is a plage.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the antitoxin is a kind of a playback.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the antitoxin is ergotic.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the grits is a miterwort.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the antitoxin is not a minge.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__