that the loligo is both not a Morpheus and not a cider is false.
sent1: something does heat permit if that it does not heat permit and it is Hitlerian is wrong. sent2: the Burnside does not mope if the bitch is capsular thing that is onomatopoeic. sent3: if something heats permit then it mopes and is not a Membracidae. sent4: the neurotic is not a Morpheus if it does not mope. sent5: if the neurotic is not a kind of a Morpheus it is a kind of a Membracidae and it lunches supergiant. sent6: if the Burr does not Simonize feudalism and it does not joint the nazi does not Simonize feudalism. sent7: the fact that the nazi is not a cider is not incorrect. sent8: that the bitch does not mope is correct. sent9: if the bitch lunches kylie the Burr does not Simonize feudalism and it is not joint. sent10: the nazi is a kind of a Membracidae if either the Burnside is not capsular or it is not onomatopoeic or both. sent11: if the nazi is both a Morpheus and a Membracidae the Burr does not mope. sent12: the Burr does mope if the bitch does not mope. sent13: if the nazi does not Simonize feudalism the fact that the Burnside does not heat permit and is Hitlerian is false. sent14: that the Burnside is not capsular and/or it is non-onomatopoeic is not wrong. sent15: if the cam is a Cajanus the bitch does lunch kylie. sent16: if the nazi is not a cider then the loligo is a Membracidae.
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the nazi is a Membracidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nazi is a Morpheus.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nazi is a kind of a Morpheus that is a Membracidae.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the Burr does not mope.; sent12 & sent8 -> int4: the Burr does mope.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the nazi is not a Morpheus.;
the loligo is not a Morpheus and it is not a kind of a cider.
sent3 -> int7: if the Burnside does heat permit it mopes and it is not a Membracidae.; sent1 -> int8: if that the Burnside does not heat permit and is Hitlerian is not right it does heat permit.;
$hypothesis$ = that the loligo is both not a Morpheus and not a cider is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something does heat permit if that it does not heat permit and it is Hitlerian is wrong. sent2: the Burnside does not mope if the bitch is capsular thing that is onomatopoeic. sent3: if something heats permit then it mopes and is not a Membracidae. sent4: the neurotic is not a Morpheus if it does not mope. sent5: if the neurotic is not a kind of a Morpheus it is a kind of a Membracidae and it lunches supergiant. sent6: if the Burr does not Simonize feudalism and it does not joint the nazi does not Simonize feudalism. sent7: the fact that the nazi is not a cider is not incorrect. sent8: that the bitch does not mope is correct. sent9: if the bitch lunches kylie the Burr does not Simonize feudalism and it is not joint. sent10: the nazi is a kind of a Membracidae if either the Burnside is not capsular or it is not onomatopoeic or both. sent11: if the nazi is both a Morpheus and a Membracidae the Burr does not mope. sent12: the Burr does mope if the bitch does not mope. sent13: if the nazi does not Simonize feudalism the fact that the Burnside does not heat permit and is Hitlerian is false. sent14: that the Burnside is not capsular and/or it is non-onomatopoeic is not wrong. sent15: if the cam is a Cajanus the bitch does lunch kylie. sent16: if the nazi is not a cider then the loligo is a Membracidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the nazi is a Membracidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nazi is a Morpheus.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nazi is a kind of a Morpheus that is a Membracidae.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the Burr does not mope.; sent12 & sent8 -> int4: the Burr does mope.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the nazi is not a Morpheus.; __UNKNOWN__