that if the sandpaper spawns the Jay is a traversal is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the convection is not a spawn but unplayful does not hold. sent2: something does not reopen ninth if it does not reopen speciation. sent3: the chaja reopens gynoecium if that the demantoid is not a kob and it does not reopen ninth is wrong. sent4: if the chaja does reopen gynoecium the Jay is a traversal. sent5: if the convection is unplayful or it does reopen speciation or both the sandpaper is not a kind of a spawn. sent6: the fact that the demantoid is not a kob and does not reopen ninth is false if the convection does not reopen ninth.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the convection does reopen speciation.; assump2 -> int1: the convection is unplayful and/or it reopens speciation.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the sandpaper does not spawn.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sandpaper is a spawn.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the convection does not reopen speciation.; sent2 -> int5: that the convection does not reopen ninth if the convection does not reopen speciation hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the convection does not reopen ninth is not wrong.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the demantoid is not a kob and does not reopen ninth is not true.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the fact that the chaja reopens gynoecium hold.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the Jay is a kind of a traversal.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the sandpaper spawns the Jay is a traversal is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the convection is not a spawn but unplayful does not hold. sent2: something does not reopen ninth if it does not reopen speciation. sent3: the chaja reopens gynoecium if that the demantoid is not a kob and it does not reopen ninth is wrong. sent4: if the chaja does reopen gynoecium the Jay is a traversal. sent5: if the convection is unplayful or it does reopen speciation or both the sandpaper is not a kind of a spawn. sent6: the fact that the demantoid is not a kob and does not reopen ninth is false if the convection does not reopen ninth. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the convection does reopen speciation.; assump2 -> int1: the convection is unplayful and/or it reopens speciation.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the sandpaper does not spawn.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sandpaper is a spawn.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the convection does not reopen speciation.; sent2 -> int5: that the convection does not reopen ninth if the convection does not reopen speciation hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the convection does not reopen ninth is not wrong.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the demantoid is not a kob and does not reopen ninth is not true.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the fact that the chaja reopens gynoecium hold.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the Jay is a kind of a traversal.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__