the habituation does not occur if the moor does not occur and the photoelectricity does not occur.
sent1: if the nurturance does not occur the fact that the toppingness occurs and the suggesting does not occur is not right. sent2: if the fact that the toppingness but not the suggesting occurs is not right the toppingness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the baryticness does not occur and the navigation does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the moor does not occur and the photoelectricity does not occur is incorrect if the habituation happens. sent5: the fact that the non-adoptableness and the non-primariness occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the nurturance occurs and the aerophilatelicness happens is not true then the nurturance does not occur. sent7: that either the scaling sourwood or the non-thermostaticsness or both happens causes that the extending does not occur. sent8: the fact that the fact that the cloudiness but not the scaling troop happens is right does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the non-neurotoxicness and the alluvion occurs is wrong the intriguing beats does not occur. sent10: that the intriguing beats does not occur causes that the scaling sourwood happens and/or that the thermostaticsness does not occur. sent11: that the nurturance occurs and the aerophilatelicness happens is false if the extending does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the habituation happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the moor does not occur and the photoelectricity does not occur is wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the moor does not occur and the photoelectricity does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the habituation does not occur.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the toppingness does not occur and the axillariness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the habituation does not occur if the moor does not occur and the photoelectricity does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nurturance does not occur the fact that the toppingness occurs and the suggesting does not occur is not right. sent2: if the fact that the toppingness but not the suggesting occurs is not right the toppingness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the baryticness does not occur and the navigation does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the moor does not occur and the photoelectricity does not occur is incorrect if the habituation happens. sent5: the fact that the non-adoptableness and the non-primariness occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the nurturance occurs and the aerophilatelicness happens is not true then the nurturance does not occur. sent7: that either the scaling sourwood or the non-thermostaticsness or both happens causes that the extending does not occur. sent8: the fact that the fact that the cloudiness but not the scaling troop happens is right does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the non-neurotoxicness and the alluvion occurs is wrong the intriguing beats does not occur. sent10: that the intriguing beats does not occur causes that the scaling sourwood happens and/or that the thermostaticsness does not occur. sent11: that the nurturance occurs and the aerophilatelicness happens is false if the extending does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the habituation happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the moor does not occur and the photoelectricity does not occur is wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the moor does not occur and the photoelectricity does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the habituation does not occur.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__