the fact that the fact that the bovine is not a kind of a ripsaw but it is roentgenographic is not false is not true if the binder is maxillofacial.
sent1: that the discharge is not a kind of a ripsaw hold. sent2: the discharge does not reheat Sinclair if there are non-oceanic and polychromatic things. sent3: the binder does not drill Rhexia if the fact that the bovine is maxillofacial and roentgenographic is not true. sent4: the bovine does not reheat Sinclair. sent5: something is both inner and a Pimpinella. sent6: that the discharge is not maxillofacial and does drill blockade-runner is false. sent7: the binder is not maxillofacial if something does not drill blockade-runner and is polychromatic. sent8: the bovine does not tailgate Dipper. sent9: if the dean is not roentgenographic then the bovine is not oceanic. sent10: the bovine is a kind of a rocket. sent11: the binder does drill Rhexia. sent12: the advancer is not polychromatic. sent13: the dean is a jitter. sent14: there exists something such that it is oceanic and does drill Rhexia. sent15: if the advancer is not oceanic the fact that the dean reheats Sinclair and is oceanic is incorrect. sent16: that the binder does not reheat Sinclair is not wrong. sent17: the binder does not drill blockade-runner and is maxillofacial. sent18: if that the fact that the bovine is a kind of oceanic thing that is a ripsaw is not right is right the fact that the advancer does not drill Rhexia hold. sent19: the fact that that the bovine does not reheat Sinclair hold if the fact that the dean is not roentgenographic is true is not incorrect. sent20: if something that does not drill blockade-runner is roentgenographic then the discharge drills Rhexia. sent21: if something does not drill Rhexia then that it is both not a ripsaw and not non-roentgenographic is false. sent22: the bovine does not drill Rhexia if that the dean does reheat Sinclair and it is oceanic is not true. sent23: there exists something such that the fact that it does not drill Concord hold. sent24: the discharge is roentgenographic.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the discharge does not drill blockade-runner but it is polychromatic.; assump2 -> int1: something does not drill blockade-runner but it is polychromatic.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the binder is not maxillofacial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the binder is maxillofacial.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the discharge does not drill blockade-runner but it is polychromatic does not hold.; sent21 -> int5: if the bovine does not drill Rhexia that it is not a ripsaw and is roentgenographic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the bovine is not a kind of a ripsaw but it is roentgenographic is not false is not true if the binder is maxillofacial. ; $context$ = sent1: that the discharge is not a kind of a ripsaw hold. sent2: the discharge does not reheat Sinclair if there are non-oceanic and polychromatic things. sent3: the binder does not drill Rhexia if the fact that the bovine is maxillofacial and roentgenographic is not true. sent4: the bovine does not reheat Sinclair. sent5: something is both inner and a Pimpinella. sent6: that the discharge is not maxillofacial and does drill blockade-runner is false. sent7: the binder is not maxillofacial if something does not drill blockade-runner and is polychromatic. sent8: the bovine does not tailgate Dipper. sent9: if the dean is not roentgenographic then the bovine is not oceanic. sent10: the bovine is a kind of a rocket. sent11: the binder does drill Rhexia. sent12: the advancer is not polychromatic. sent13: the dean is a jitter. sent14: there exists something such that it is oceanic and does drill Rhexia. sent15: if the advancer is not oceanic the fact that the dean reheats Sinclair and is oceanic is incorrect. sent16: that the binder does not reheat Sinclair is not wrong. sent17: the binder does not drill blockade-runner and is maxillofacial. sent18: if that the fact that the bovine is a kind of oceanic thing that is a ripsaw is not right is right the fact that the advancer does not drill Rhexia hold. sent19: the fact that that the bovine does not reheat Sinclair hold if the fact that the dean is not roentgenographic is true is not incorrect. sent20: if something that does not drill blockade-runner is roentgenographic then the discharge drills Rhexia. sent21: if something does not drill Rhexia then that it is both not a ripsaw and not non-roentgenographic is false. sent22: the bovine does not drill Rhexia if that the dean does reheat Sinclair and it is oceanic is not true. sent23: there exists something such that the fact that it does not drill Concord hold. sent24: the discharge is roentgenographic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the discharge does not drill blockade-runner but it is polychromatic.; assump2 -> int1: something does not drill blockade-runner but it is polychromatic.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the binder is not maxillofacial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the binder is maxillofacial.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the discharge does not drill blockade-runner but it is polychromatic does not hold.; sent21 -> int5: if the bovine does not drill Rhexia that it is not a ripsaw and is roentgenographic does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__