the medusa is not a kind of a horsehide.
sent1: if the hydration is basinal the fact that it is not a kind of a sigma and it is not a allegorizer is not true. sent2: the tetrahydrocannabinol is a horsehide. sent3: the larder is a Ilex but not a keep if the medusa is a horsehide. sent4: the hydration is basinal if that the scallion is non-occipital and a countercurrent does not hold. sent5: the larder is not a kind of a sigma if that the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed but it is a Ilex does not hold. sent6: if something is not a kind of a sigma that it does not expense expressed and is ascosporic is false. sent7: either the hydration is not a allegorizer or it does not expense expressed or both. sent8: if the fact that the tetrahydrocannabinol is non-basinal but not a allegorizer is false it is not a sigma. sent9: if the slipstick reopens Hadrian then the mignonette is a paragrapher. sent10: that the slipstick does not concern messaging hold if the larder is both a Ilex and not a keep. sent11: if the tetrahydrocannabinol is ascosporic then the slipstick is non-basinal. sent12: the slipstick is not a kind of a Ilex. sent13: the fact that the slipstick is a Ilex is correct if the larder concerns messaging. sent14: if the slipstick expenses Hemerocallis the mignonette is a paragrapher. sent15: the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed if the fact that the hydration is not a sigma and it is not a allegorizer is wrong. sent16: the slipstick is both not ascosporic and not a paragrapher if the mignonette does not expense expressed. sent17: if something is not ascosporic and not a paragrapher the fact that it does not expense Hemerocallis is right. sent18: that the tetrahydrocannabinol is not basinal and is not a allegorizer does not hold. sent19: the slipstick is an heirloom. sent20: if the medusa does not concern messaging that the mignonette is a horsehide and it is a sigma does not hold. sent21: the medusa does not concern messaging but it does reopen Hadrian if the larder does expense Hemerocallis. sent22: something does expense Hemerocallis and/or it reopens Hadrian if it does not concern messaging. sent23: if the hydration is not a kind of a allegorizer or it does not expense expressed or both then the tetrahydrocannabinol is not a paragrapher. sent24: that the mignonette does not expense expressed is true if the fact that the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed is not false. sent25: if the fact that something is a kind of a horsehide that is a kind of a sigma is not right it is not a sigma. sent26: that something does haul and it is a silene is not correct if it is not a dislodgment. sent27: the medusa is a horsehide if the larder concerns messaging.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the medusa is a horsehide.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the larder is a kind of a Ilex that is not a keep.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the slipstick does not concern messaging is right.; sent22 -> int3: if the slipstick does not concern messaging then that it does expense Hemerocallis or it does reopen Hadrian or both is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: either the slipstick does expense Hemerocallis or it does reopen Hadrian or both.; int4 & sent14 & sent9 -> int5: the mignonette is a paragrapher.; sent6 -> int6: that the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed but it is ascosporic does not hold if it is not a sigma.; sent8 & sent18 -> int7: the tetrahydrocannabinol is not a sigma.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed and is ascosporic is incorrect.;
the medusa is a horsehide.
sent17 -> int9: if the slipstick is both not ascosporic and not a paragrapher the fact that it does not expense Hemerocallis is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the medusa is not a kind of a horsehide. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hydration is basinal the fact that it is not a kind of a sigma and it is not a allegorizer is not true. sent2: the tetrahydrocannabinol is a horsehide. sent3: the larder is a Ilex but not a keep if the medusa is a horsehide. sent4: the hydration is basinal if that the scallion is non-occipital and a countercurrent does not hold. sent5: the larder is not a kind of a sigma if that the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed but it is a Ilex does not hold. sent6: if something is not a kind of a sigma that it does not expense expressed and is ascosporic is false. sent7: either the hydration is not a allegorizer or it does not expense expressed or both. sent8: if the fact that the tetrahydrocannabinol is non-basinal but not a allegorizer is false it is not a sigma. sent9: if the slipstick reopens Hadrian then the mignonette is a paragrapher. sent10: that the slipstick does not concern messaging hold if the larder is both a Ilex and not a keep. sent11: if the tetrahydrocannabinol is ascosporic then the slipstick is non-basinal. sent12: the slipstick is not a kind of a Ilex. sent13: the fact that the slipstick is a Ilex is correct if the larder concerns messaging. sent14: if the slipstick expenses Hemerocallis the mignonette is a paragrapher. sent15: the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed if the fact that the hydration is not a sigma and it is not a allegorizer is wrong. sent16: the slipstick is both not ascosporic and not a paragrapher if the mignonette does not expense expressed. sent17: if something is not ascosporic and not a paragrapher the fact that it does not expense Hemerocallis is right. sent18: that the tetrahydrocannabinol is not basinal and is not a allegorizer does not hold. sent19: the slipstick is an heirloom. sent20: if the medusa does not concern messaging that the mignonette is a horsehide and it is a sigma does not hold. sent21: the medusa does not concern messaging but it does reopen Hadrian if the larder does expense Hemerocallis. sent22: something does expense Hemerocallis and/or it reopens Hadrian if it does not concern messaging. sent23: if the hydration is not a kind of a allegorizer or it does not expense expressed or both then the tetrahydrocannabinol is not a paragrapher. sent24: that the mignonette does not expense expressed is true if the fact that the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed is not false. sent25: if the fact that something is a kind of a horsehide that is a kind of a sigma is not right it is not a sigma. sent26: that something does haul and it is a silene is not correct if it is not a dislodgment. sent27: the medusa is a horsehide if the larder concerns messaging. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the medusa is a horsehide.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the larder is a kind of a Ilex that is not a keep.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the slipstick does not concern messaging is right.; sent22 -> int3: if the slipstick does not concern messaging then that it does expense Hemerocallis or it does reopen Hadrian or both is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: either the slipstick does expense Hemerocallis or it does reopen Hadrian or both.; int4 & sent14 & sent9 -> int5: the mignonette is a paragrapher.; sent6 -> int6: that the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed but it is ascosporic does not hold if it is not a sigma.; sent8 & sent18 -> int7: the tetrahydrocannabinol is not a sigma.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the tetrahydrocannabinol does not expense expressed and is ascosporic is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__