that there exists something such that if the fact that it is both not excitable and not deconstructionist is incorrect then it is not unreal is not correct.
sent1: if the fact that the barite is not a cardiograph and it is not a geostrategy is not true it does efface overflight. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both not a croup and not a play it is not a kind of a Dorian. sent3: if the fact that the pollinator does not variegate and is not commodious is false it is deconstructionist. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a waterwheel and it is not a packed does not hold it is not innocuous. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a waterwheel but a denticle is not true then the fact that it is not a convolution is not wrong. sent6: if the fact that the pollinator is not a kind of a patty and it is not a enthalpy does not hold then it is not intemperate. sent7: the pollinator is not unreal if it is existent. sent8: the pollinator is unexcitable if the fact that it does not efface inefficacy and it is not unselfish does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is existent then it is not a destructiveness. sent10: there exists something such that if it is both not a Gnostic and not gastronomic then it is not an arrowsmith. sent11: the motorboat does not tin clincher if that it is both not a spraying and excitable is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the pollinator is not unreal hold if that it is not excitable and it is not deconstructionist is not true. sent13: if the fact that the pollinator is both not excitable and non-meteoritic does not hold it is not rhetorical. sent14: if the fact that the pollinator is not mindless but it is an application is not correct then it is not unreal. sent15: something does not efface chlamydospore if the fact that it is both not a aquatint and not a dragging is not right.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a aquatint and it is not a dragging does not hold then it does not efface chlamydospore.
sent15 -> int1: if that the agnathan does not aquatint and it is not a dragging is wrong that it does not efface chlamydospore is not wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is both not excitable and not deconstructionist is incorrect then it is not unreal is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the barite is not a cardiograph and it is not a geostrategy is not true it does efface overflight. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both not a croup and not a play it is not a kind of a Dorian. sent3: if the fact that the pollinator does not variegate and is not commodious is false it is deconstructionist. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a waterwheel and it is not a packed does not hold it is not innocuous. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a waterwheel but a denticle is not true then the fact that it is not a convolution is not wrong. sent6: if the fact that the pollinator is not a kind of a patty and it is not a enthalpy does not hold then it is not intemperate. sent7: the pollinator is not unreal if it is existent. sent8: the pollinator is unexcitable if the fact that it does not efface inefficacy and it is not unselfish does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is existent then it is not a destructiveness. sent10: there exists something such that if it is both not a Gnostic and not gastronomic then it is not an arrowsmith. sent11: the motorboat does not tin clincher if that it is both not a spraying and excitable is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the pollinator is not unreal hold if that it is not excitable and it is not deconstructionist is not true. sent13: if the fact that the pollinator is both not excitable and non-meteoritic does not hold it is not rhetorical. sent14: if the fact that the pollinator is not mindless but it is an application is not correct then it is not unreal. sent15: something does not efface chlamydospore if the fact that it is both not a aquatint and not a dragging is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__