the Laotianness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the manacling garambulla does not occur is not false. sent2: the schism does not occur. sent3: the inviting slump does not occur and the Semiteness does not occur. sent4: that the Laotianness does not occur is triggered by that the ebbing samarium happens or that the oceanicness occurs or both. sent5: the starchyness is caused by that both the inviting slump and the non-Semiteness occurs. sent6: the ebbing samarium does not occur if that the ebbing samarium and the oceanicness happens is not true. sent7: the Commerce occurs if the attending happens. sent8: the starchlessness does not occur if the inviting slump does not occur and the Semiteness does not occur. sent9: the attending occurs. sent10: the determining occurs. sent11: that the starchlessness does not occur but the Commerce occurs results in the ebbing samarium. sent12: the starchlessness does not occur if not the inviting slump but the Semiteness occurs.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the starchlessness does not occur.; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: the Commerce happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: not the starchlessness but the Commerce occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the ebbing samarium occurs.; int4 -> int5: the ebbing samarium and/or the oceanicness happens.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the Laotianness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the Laotianness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the manacling garambulla does not occur is not false. sent2: the schism does not occur. sent3: the inviting slump does not occur and the Semiteness does not occur. sent4: that the Laotianness does not occur is triggered by that the ebbing samarium happens or that the oceanicness occurs or both. sent5: the starchyness is caused by that both the inviting slump and the non-Semiteness occurs. sent6: the ebbing samarium does not occur if that the ebbing samarium and the oceanicness happens is not true. sent7: the Commerce occurs if the attending happens. sent8: the starchlessness does not occur if the inviting slump does not occur and the Semiteness does not occur. sent9: the attending occurs. sent10: the determining occurs. sent11: that the starchlessness does not occur but the Commerce occurs results in the ebbing samarium. sent12: the starchlessness does not occur if not the inviting slump but the Semiteness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the starchlessness does not occur.; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: the Commerce happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: not the starchlessness but the Commerce occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the ebbing samarium occurs.; int4 -> int5: the ebbing samarium and/or the oceanicness happens.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__