that the limousine does nurse and it is aquicultural is wrong.
sent1: something does not urticate Education but it does desexualize superstrate. sent2: the ancient is not upstream. sent3: if the idol does extort the neckpiece is not a Njord or not aquicultural or both. sent4: the victimizer is not a Njord if something that does not urticate Education desexualizes superstrate. sent5: the limousine is not carbocyclic if the hagberry is a kind of non-carbocyclic thing that is not upstream. sent6: the fact that the ancient is a frontal is right if something is a kind of a frontal and/or it does not desexualize shunter. sent7: that the typist is not carbocyclic is not false if something is not a Njord and is aquicultural. sent8: if that the victimizer is not a kind of a Njord is not wrong then that the fact that the typist is not aquicultural and does not extort is not false is wrong. sent9: if something is not carbocyclic then that it does nurse and it is aquicultural is incorrect. sent10: that the hagberry is not polymorphous and it is not a Hanuman does not hold if the undoer is not a kind of a nurse. sent11: if the victimizer is frontal then the typist is carbocyclic. sent12: if the fact that something is not a Njord or it is not aquicultural or both hold then the spherometer is upstream. sent13: that the victimizer is not buccal is correct. sent14: that something is not seaworthy or it is courteous or both is not right if it is not a nurse. sent15: that the ancient is not aquicultural and it is not a frontal is false. sent16: something is a frontal or it does not desexualize shunter or both. sent17: if the undoer is not courteous then the fact that the limousine is courteous and is upstream is incorrect. sent18: if there is something such that that it is not aquicultural and it does not extort does not hold then the limousine is aquicultural. sent19: the idol does extort if the shunter desexualizes superstrate and does not extort. sent20: if the hagberry does not desexualize superstrate then it extorts and it is a kind of a Njord. sent21: if the ancient is a nurse then the undoer does not nurse. sent22: if the fact that the undoer is carbocyclic but it is not upstream is not true the ancient is non-frontal. sent23: if that something is frontal is not incorrect then it is both not carbocyclic and not upstream. sent24: that the ancient does nurse is not wrong if the typist is a kind of a nurse. sent25: if something is carbocyclic it nurses. sent26: if the hagberry is not carbocyclic the fact that the undoer is carbocyclic but not upstream is not correct. sent27: the fact that the hagberry is not carbocyclic if the fact that the limousine is either unseaworthy or courteous or both does not hold hold.
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the limousine either is unseaworthy or is courteous or both does not hold if it is not a nurse.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the limousine does not nurse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the limousine is either unseaworthy or courteous or both does not hold.; int2 & sent27 -> int3: the hagberry is not carbocyclic.; int3 & sent26 -> int4: that the undoer is carbocyclic and is not upstream is not right.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the ancient is not frontal.; sent16 & sent6 -> int6: the ancient is not non-frontal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the limousine nurses.; sent1 & sent4 -> int9: the victimizer is not a Njord.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the typist is not aquicultural and does not extort is not correct.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is not aquicultural and it does not extort is not right.; int11 & sent18 -> int12: the limousine is aquicultural.; int8 & int12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it is both not polymorphous and not a Hanuman does not hold.
sent25 -> int13: if the typist is carbocyclic it does nurse.;
$hypothesis$ = that the limousine does nurse and it is aquicultural is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not urticate Education but it does desexualize superstrate. sent2: the ancient is not upstream. sent3: if the idol does extort the neckpiece is not a Njord or not aquicultural or both. sent4: the victimizer is not a Njord if something that does not urticate Education desexualizes superstrate. sent5: the limousine is not carbocyclic if the hagberry is a kind of non-carbocyclic thing that is not upstream. sent6: the fact that the ancient is a frontal is right if something is a kind of a frontal and/or it does not desexualize shunter. sent7: that the typist is not carbocyclic is not false if something is not a Njord and is aquicultural. sent8: if that the victimizer is not a kind of a Njord is not wrong then that the fact that the typist is not aquicultural and does not extort is not false is wrong. sent9: if something is not carbocyclic then that it does nurse and it is aquicultural is incorrect. sent10: that the hagberry is not polymorphous and it is not a Hanuman does not hold if the undoer is not a kind of a nurse. sent11: if the victimizer is frontal then the typist is carbocyclic. sent12: if the fact that something is not a Njord or it is not aquicultural or both hold then the spherometer is upstream. sent13: that the victimizer is not buccal is correct. sent14: that something is not seaworthy or it is courteous or both is not right if it is not a nurse. sent15: that the ancient is not aquicultural and it is not a frontal is false. sent16: something is a frontal or it does not desexualize shunter or both. sent17: if the undoer is not courteous then the fact that the limousine is courteous and is upstream is incorrect. sent18: if there is something such that that it is not aquicultural and it does not extort does not hold then the limousine is aquicultural. sent19: the idol does extort if the shunter desexualizes superstrate and does not extort. sent20: if the hagberry does not desexualize superstrate then it extorts and it is a kind of a Njord. sent21: if the ancient is a nurse then the undoer does not nurse. sent22: if the fact that the undoer is carbocyclic but it is not upstream is not true the ancient is non-frontal. sent23: if that something is frontal is not incorrect then it is both not carbocyclic and not upstream. sent24: that the ancient does nurse is not wrong if the typist is a kind of a nurse. sent25: if something is carbocyclic it nurses. sent26: if the hagberry is not carbocyclic the fact that the undoer is carbocyclic but not upstream is not correct. sent27: the fact that the hagberry is not carbocyclic if the fact that the limousine is either unseaworthy or courteous or both does not hold hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the limousine either is unseaworthy or is courteous or both does not hold if it is not a nurse.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the limousine does not nurse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the limousine is either unseaworthy or courteous or both does not hold.; int2 & sent27 -> int3: the hagberry is not carbocyclic.; int3 & sent26 -> int4: that the undoer is carbocyclic and is not upstream is not right.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the ancient is not frontal.; sent16 & sent6 -> int6: the ancient is not non-frontal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the limousine nurses.; sent1 & sent4 -> int9: the victimizer is not a Njord.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the typist is not aquicultural and does not extort is not correct.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is not aquicultural and it does not extort is not right.; int11 & sent18 -> int12: the limousine is aquicultural.; int8 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__