the fact that the icosahedralness and/or the reunifying dollop occurs is not right.
sent1: the fact that the tinniness but not the courante occurs is incorrect. sent2: the skedaddle does not occur. sent3: the interspersion does not occur. sent4: the fact that the fact that both the non-Romanshness and the intercostal occurs hold is wrong. sent5: the fold does not occur. sent6: if the arrogating does not occur and the sequencing pestilence does not occur then the arrogance does not occur. sent7: that the aerial does not occur and the bite does not occur does not hold. sent8: the acidoticness does not occur and the interspersion does not occur. sent9: if the arrogance does not occur then the aerial does not occur and the bite does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the arrogating does not occur and the sequencing pestilence does not occur is wrong then the icosahedralness occurs. sent11: the aerial does not occur if that the reunifying dollop does not occur and the icosahedralness does not occur is false. sent12: that the identifiableness does not occur and the drawing does not occur is triggered by that the bite does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arrogating does not occur and the sequencing pestilence does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the arrogance does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the aerialness does not occur and the bite does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the arrogating does not occur and the sequencing pestilence does not occur is incorrect.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the icosahedralness happens.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the identifiableness does not occur and the drawing does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the icosahedralness and/or the reunifying dollop occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the tinniness but not the courante occurs is incorrect. sent2: the skedaddle does not occur. sent3: the interspersion does not occur. sent4: the fact that the fact that both the non-Romanshness and the intercostal occurs hold is wrong. sent5: the fold does not occur. sent6: if the arrogating does not occur and the sequencing pestilence does not occur then the arrogance does not occur. sent7: that the aerial does not occur and the bite does not occur does not hold. sent8: the acidoticness does not occur and the interspersion does not occur. sent9: if the arrogance does not occur then the aerial does not occur and the bite does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the arrogating does not occur and the sequencing pestilence does not occur is wrong then the icosahedralness occurs. sent11: the aerial does not occur if that the reunifying dollop does not occur and the icosahedralness does not occur is false. sent12: that the identifiableness does not occur and the drawing does not occur is triggered by that the bite does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arrogating does not occur and the sequencing pestilence does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the arrogance does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the aerialness does not occur and the bite does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the arrogating does not occur and the sequencing pestilence does not occur is incorrect.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the icosahedralness happens.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__