that that the barring readership and the non-Paraguayanness occurs is triggered by that the prolixness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: if the gathering sketcher happens the barring readership occurs. sent2: the aquatics does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the fortification does not occur is correct the maniness happens. sent4: the fact that that the shambolicness occurs prevents that the leaping does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that if the conception occurs that the spiel does not occur and the duet does not occur does not hold is not incorrect. sent6: the gathering sketcher is triggered by that the leaping happens. sent7: the shambolicness happens if the prolixness happens. sent8: if the aquatics does not occur then both the sickening edged and the conception happens. sent9: that the suborning unprofitableness does not occur and the inelasticness does not occur is not correct if the lead happens. sent10: the fact that the Paraguayanness does not occur hold if that the spieling does not occur and the duet does not occur is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prolixness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the shambolicness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the leap happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the gathering sketcher happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the barring readership occurs hold.; sent8 & sent2 -> int5: the sickening edged occurs and the conception occurs.; int5 -> int6: the conception occurs.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the spiel does not occur and the duet does not occur is not correct.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the Paraguayan does not occur.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the barring readership happens but the Paraguayanness does not occur.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the barring readership and the non-Paraguayanness occurs is triggered by that the prolixness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gathering sketcher happens the barring readership occurs. sent2: the aquatics does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the fortification does not occur is correct the maniness happens. sent4: the fact that that the shambolicness occurs prevents that the leaping does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that if the conception occurs that the spiel does not occur and the duet does not occur does not hold is not incorrect. sent6: the gathering sketcher is triggered by that the leaping happens. sent7: the shambolicness happens if the prolixness happens. sent8: if the aquatics does not occur then both the sickening edged and the conception happens. sent9: that the suborning unprofitableness does not occur and the inelasticness does not occur is not correct if the lead happens. sent10: the fact that the Paraguayanness does not occur hold if that the spieling does not occur and the duet does not occur is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prolixness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the shambolicness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the leap happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the gathering sketcher happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the barring readership occurs hold.; sent8 & sent2 -> int5: the sickening edged occurs and the conception occurs.; int5 -> int6: the conception occurs.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the spiel does not occur and the duet does not occur is not correct.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the Paraguayan does not occur.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the barring readership happens but the Paraguayanness does not occur.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__