something is post-communist and it is a pleaser.
sent1: something that is apneic is a pleaser. sent2: the peptization apologizes and is precocious. sent3: that the nitrobacterium is apneic is true if it is not apneic or is not a Docetism or both. sent4: if the nitrobacterium is not post-communist then the cinquefoil is not a sportswear and reflects impeccability. sent5: the nitrobacterium is apneic and/or it is not a kind of a Docetism. sent6: the fact that the fact that the cinquefoil is not the sportswear and reflects impeccability is wrong if the fact that the cinquefoil is not a Catasetum hold is right. sent7: if the nitrobacterium is not post-communist then the cinquefoil is not a sportswear. sent8: the fact that the cinquefoil is a sportswear and it does reflect impeccability is incorrect. sent9: if something is not post-communist then that it is not a hipflask and does result peptization is not true. sent10: if the nitrobacterium is not a kind of a Catasetum and it is not apneic it is not a pleaser.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nitrobacterium is not post-communist.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the cinquefoil is not a sportswear but it reflects impeccability.; sent1 -> int2: if the nitrobacterium is apneic then it is a pleaser.; sent3 & sent5 -> int3: the nitrobacterium is apneic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the nitrobacterium is a kind of a pleaser.;
the fact that the boxfish is not a kind of a hipflask but it results peptization is not correct.
sent9 -> int5: the fact that the boxfish is not a hipflask and does result peptization is not right if the fact that it is not post-communist is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = something is post-communist and it is a pleaser. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is apneic is a pleaser. sent2: the peptization apologizes and is precocious. sent3: that the nitrobacterium is apneic is true if it is not apneic or is not a Docetism or both. sent4: if the nitrobacterium is not post-communist then the cinquefoil is not a sportswear and reflects impeccability. sent5: the nitrobacterium is apneic and/or it is not a kind of a Docetism. sent6: the fact that the fact that the cinquefoil is not the sportswear and reflects impeccability is wrong if the fact that the cinquefoil is not a Catasetum hold is right. sent7: if the nitrobacterium is not post-communist then the cinquefoil is not a sportswear. sent8: the fact that the cinquefoil is a sportswear and it does reflect impeccability is incorrect. sent9: if something is not post-communist then that it is not a hipflask and does result peptization is not true. sent10: if the nitrobacterium is not a kind of a Catasetum and it is not apneic it is not a pleaser. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nitrobacterium is not post-communist.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the cinquefoil is not a sportswear but it reflects impeccability.; sent1 -> int2: if the nitrobacterium is apneic then it is a pleaser.; sent3 & sent5 -> int3: the nitrobacterium is apneic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the nitrobacterium is a kind of a pleaser.; __UNKNOWN__