if the mistress is a wadi the airliner does browse ABM.
sent1: the airliner browses ABM if it is not a kind of a thirty. sent2: the airliner is a thirty. sent3: the airliner is not a wadi. sent4: if that the mistress does not disunify ABM and is a wadi does not hold it is a thirty. sent5: the fact that the mistress browses ABM is not wrong. sent6: something browses ABM if the fact that it is not a lecture and it is a thirty does not hold. sent7: the airliner is not Yeatsian. sent8: the airliner is a kind of a wadi if the mistress is not a lecture but it is a thirty. sent9: that the almoner does corset coverall hold. sent10: if the airliner is not a thirty but it disunifies ABM that the mistress browses ABM is correct. sent11: the renin does browse ABM. sent12: the fact that the mistress disunifies ABM is not incorrect if it does corset coverall. sent13: that the airliner does not corset coverall and is a thirty is false. sent14: something does browse ABM if the fact that it is not a thirty hold. sent15: the mistress does not obtain and does concord. sent16: the fact that if the fact that something browses ABM and is a wadi does not hold then it is not a kind of a wadi is not false. sent17: if that something does not corset coverall and is a lecture is false it is a thirty. sent18: the mistress corsets coverall if the airliner is not a lecture but it is a kind of a thirty. sent19: if the mistress does disunify ABM that it is not a wadi is correct. sent20: the outfield is not a lecture. sent21: the mistress is a wadi if it disunifies ABM.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airliner does not lecture but it is a thirty.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the mistress does corset coverall.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the mistress does disunify ABM.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the mistress is not a kind of a wadi.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mistress is a wadi.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the airliner is not a lecture and is a thirty is incorrect.; sent6 -> int6: the airliner browses ABM if the fact that it is not a lecture and it is a thirty is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the airliner browses ABM.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the ABM does corset coverall.
sent16 -> int8: if that the airliner does browse ABM and is a wadi is not correct then it is not a wadi.;
$hypothesis$ = if the mistress is a wadi the airliner does browse ABM. ; $context$ = sent1: the airliner browses ABM if it is not a kind of a thirty. sent2: the airliner is a thirty. sent3: the airliner is not a wadi. sent4: if that the mistress does not disunify ABM and is a wadi does not hold it is a thirty. sent5: the fact that the mistress browses ABM is not wrong. sent6: something browses ABM if the fact that it is not a lecture and it is a thirty does not hold. sent7: the airliner is not Yeatsian. sent8: the airliner is a kind of a wadi if the mistress is not a lecture but it is a thirty. sent9: that the almoner does corset coverall hold. sent10: if the airliner is not a thirty but it disunifies ABM that the mistress browses ABM is correct. sent11: the renin does browse ABM. sent12: the fact that the mistress disunifies ABM is not incorrect if it does corset coverall. sent13: that the airliner does not corset coverall and is a thirty is false. sent14: something does browse ABM if the fact that it is not a thirty hold. sent15: the mistress does not obtain and does concord. sent16: the fact that if the fact that something browses ABM and is a wadi does not hold then it is not a kind of a wadi is not false. sent17: if that something does not corset coverall and is a lecture is false it is a thirty. sent18: the mistress corsets coverall if the airliner is not a lecture but it is a kind of a thirty. sent19: if the mistress does disunify ABM that it is not a wadi is correct. sent20: the outfield is not a lecture. sent21: the mistress is a wadi if it disunifies ABM. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airliner does not lecture but it is a thirty.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the mistress does corset coverall.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the mistress does disunify ABM.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the mistress is not a kind of a wadi.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mistress is a wadi.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the airliner is not a lecture and is a thirty is incorrect.; sent6 -> int6: the airliner browses ABM if the fact that it is not a lecture and it is a thirty is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the airliner browses ABM.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__