that the salpinx does utter romanticist but it is not a arginine is not right.
sent1: the fact that the samite is a arginine is not wrong. sent2: if something does not unveil Canaanite it utters romanticist and it is not a arginine. sent3: the Afro-wig does not date basidiomycete. sent4: that the salpinx utters romanticist and is a arginine is false. sent5: the fact that the snarer does utter romanticist but it is not abdominovesical is not correct. sent6: That the Canaanite does unveil Afro-wig is correct. sent7: that something is a baseball if it is not balletic is correct. sent8: the fact that the Afro-wig is a arginine and does not utter romanticist is false. sent9: the Afro-wig is a theatrical if the fact that it is not a kind of a theatrical and it is a pepper-and-salt is incorrect. sent10: if the Afro-wig does not utter romanticist the fact that the salpinx does utter romanticist and it is a kind of a arginine is wrong. sent11: that the salpinx utters romanticist but it is not a arginine is not right if the fact that the Afro-wig does not utters romanticist is not incorrect. sent12: if something does unveil samite the fact that it is not a theatrical and is a pepper-and-salt is not true. sent13: if the Afro-wig does unveil Canaanite then it does not utter romanticist. sent14: everything unveils samite. sent15: that the Afro-wig does unveil Canaanite is correct. sent16: the transferor is not balletic.
sent13 & sent15 -> int1: the Afro-wig does not utter romanticist.; int1 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the salpinx utters romanticist but it is not a kind of a arginine.
sent2 -> int2: if the salpinx does not unveil Canaanite it utters romanticist and is not a arginine.; sent12 -> int3: if the oroide does unveil samite then the fact that it is a kind of untheatrical a pepper-and-salt does not hold.; sent14 -> int4: the oroide does unveil samite.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the oroide is both not a theatrical and a pepper-and-salt is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is nothing that is both not theatrical and a pepper-and-salt.; int6 -> int7: the fact that that the Afro-wig is not a kind of a theatrical but it is a pepper-and-salt hold is not true.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Afro-wig is a theatrical is not false.; sent7 -> int9: if the transferor is not balletic it is a kind of a baseball.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the transferor is a kind of a baseball.;
$hypothesis$ = that the salpinx does utter romanticist but it is not a arginine is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the samite is a arginine is not wrong. sent2: if something does not unveil Canaanite it utters romanticist and it is not a arginine. sent3: the Afro-wig does not date basidiomycete. sent4: that the salpinx utters romanticist and is a arginine is false. sent5: the fact that the snarer does utter romanticist but it is not abdominovesical is not correct. sent6: That the Canaanite does unveil Afro-wig is correct. sent7: that something is a baseball if it is not balletic is correct. sent8: the fact that the Afro-wig is a arginine and does not utter romanticist is false. sent9: the Afro-wig is a theatrical if the fact that it is not a kind of a theatrical and it is a pepper-and-salt is incorrect. sent10: if the Afro-wig does not utter romanticist the fact that the salpinx does utter romanticist and it is a kind of a arginine is wrong. sent11: that the salpinx utters romanticist but it is not a arginine is not right if the fact that the Afro-wig does not utters romanticist is not incorrect. sent12: if something does unveil samite the fact that it is not a theatrical and is a pepper-and-salt is not true. sent13: if the Afro-wig does unveil Canaanite then it does not utter romanticist. sent14: everything unveils samite. sent15: that the Afro-wig does unveil Canaanite is correct. sent16: the transferor is not balletic. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent15 -> int1: the Afro-wig does not utter romanticist.; int1 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__