that the cranesbill dirties or it is a clutter or both is incorrect.
sent1: if the hospital is monocotyledonous then the camachile is monocotyledonous. sent2: that the fact that the Islamist is not a wanderlust and is a Silverstein is not true is true if it is not a kind of a charade. sent3: if the camachile is monocotyledonous and turfs popularism the technocrat is not a Soleidae. sent4: the Islamist is curricular. sent5: the fact that something is not a Soleidae and is suctorial is not right if it is not a kind of a wanderlust. sent6: if something is a kind of curricular a charade it is not a Silverstein. sent7: if the technocrat is not a Soleidae it is not suctorial. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Soleidae but it is suctorial does not hold it dirties. sent9: if something is a Soleidae then it is dirty. sent10: the fact that the hospital is monocotyledonous hold. sent11: the Islamist is curricular and it is a kind of a charade. sent12: that the thyroid is a Silverstein and is a wanderlust is not correct if the technocrat is not suctorial. sent13: that the cranesbill is a kind of a Soleidae and it is suctorial is incorrect. sent14: if something does not flatten courante that it is dirty and/or it does clutter is incorrect. sent15: the cranesbill does not flatten courante if the fact that the thyroid is a Silverstein and it is a kind of a wanderlust is not true. sent16: if the cranesbill is not a wanderlust then the fact that it is a Soleidae that is suctorial is not true. sent17: the thyroid does not flatten courante if the Islamist is not a Silverstein. sent18: the cranesbill is not a wanderlust if the thyroid does not flatten courante.
sent6 -> int1: if the Islamist is curricular and a charade then that it is a Silverstein does not hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Islamist is not a Silverstein.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the thyroid does not flatten courante.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the cranesbill is not a wanderlust.; sent5 -> int5: that the cranesbill is not a kind of a Soleidae but it is suctorial is not correct if it is not a wanderlust.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the cranesbill is not a Soleidae but suctorial is false.; sent8 -> int7: if the fact that the cranesbill is not a Soleidae and is suctorial is false it is dirty.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the cranesbill does dirty.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cranesbill is dirty or it is a clutter or both is false.
sent14 -> int9: the fact that the cranesbill is not non-dirty or it is a clutter or both is not right if that it does not flatten courante hold.; sent1 & sent10 -> int10: the camachile is monocotyledonous.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cranesbill dirties or it is a clutter or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hospital is monocotyledonous then the camachile is monocotyledonous. sent2: that the fact that the Islamist is not a wanderlust and is a Silverstein is not true is true if it is not a kind of a charade. sent3: if the camachile is monocotyledonous and turfs popularism the technocrat is not a Soleidae. sent4: the Islamist is curricular. sent5: the fact that something is not a Soleidae and is suctorial is not right if it is not a kind of a wanderlust. sent6: if something is a kind of curricular a charade it is not a Silverstein. sent7: if the technocrat is not a Soleidae it is not suctorial. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Soleidae but it is suctorial does not hold it dirties. sent9: if something is a Soleidae then it is dirty. sent10: the fact that the hospital is monocotyledonous hold. sent11: the Islamist is curricular and it is a kind of a charade. sent12: that the thyroid is a Silverstein and is a wanderlust is not correct if the technocrat is not suctorial. sent13: that the cranesbill is a kind of a Soleidae and it is suctorial is incorrect. sent14: if something does not flatten courante that it is dirty and/or it does clutter is incorrect. sent15: the cranesbill does not flatten courante if the fact that the thyroid is a Silverstein and it is a kind of a wanderlust is not true. sent16: if the cranesbill is not a wanderlust then the fact that it is a Soleidae that is suctorial is not true. sent17: the thyroid does not flatten courante if the Islamist is not a Silverstein. sent18: the cranesbill is not a wanderlust if the thyroid does not flatten courante. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the Islamist is curricular and a charade then that it is a Silverstein does not hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Islamist is not a Silverstein.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the thyroid does not flatten courante.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the cranesbill is not a wanderlust.; sent5 -> int5: that the cranesbill is not a kind of a Soleidae but it is suctorial is not correct if it is not a wanderlust.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the cranesbill is not a Soleidae but suctorial is false.; sent8 -> int7: if the fact that the cranesbill is not a Soleidae and is suctorial is false it is dirty.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the cranesbill does dirty.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__