something is not an exposition but it is indexless.
sent1: if the defoliation is not alkaline then the fact that it is budgetary thing that is hypovolemic is not true. sent2: if that the northeaster is not a Opisthocomidae and spoils neglect does not hold then the defoliation is not alkaline. sent3: that the overhead is not a kind of an exposition is not incorrect if the fact that it is Handelian and is pediatrics is not true. sent4: the overhead is not an exposition if that it is non-pediatrics is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the fact that the northeaster is not a Opisthocomidae but it does spoil neglect hold is wrong. sent6: that the overhead is both Handelian and pediatrics does not hold. sent7: if the panopticon is a kind of a Omani then the overhead is indexless. sent8: if the gregarine is not hypovolemic the panopticon is a kind of non-solar thing that does not intuit. sent9: if there is something such that that it is budgetary and it is hypovolemic is wrong the gregarine is not hypovolemic.
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the overhead is not an exposition.;
the Shoshone is not a kind of an exposition.
sent2 & sent5 -> int2: that the defoliation is not alkaline is not false.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: that the defoliation is both budgetary and not non-hypovolemic is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is budgetary and is hypovolemic is not true.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the gregarine is not hypovolemic.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the panopticon is not solar and does not intuit.; int6 -> int7: the panopticon does not intuit.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it does not intuit.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not an exposition but it is indexless. ; $context$ = sent1: if the defoliation is not alkaline then the fact that it is budgetary thing that is hypovolemic is not true. sent2: if that the northeaster is not a Opisthocomidae and spoils neglect does not hold then the defoliation is not alkaline. sent3: that the overhead is not a kind of an exposition is not incorrect if the fact that it is Handelian and is pediatrics is not true. sent4: the overhead is not an exposition if that it is non-pediatrics is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the fact that the northeaster is not a Opisthocomidae but it does spoil neglect hold is wrong. sent6: that the overhead is both Handelian and pediatrics does not hold. sent7: if the panopticon is a kind of a Omani then the overhead is indexless. sent8: if the gregarine is not hypovolemic the panopticon is a kind of non-solar thing that does not intuit. sent9: if there is something such that that it is budgetary and it is hypovolemic is wrong the gregarine is not hypovolemic. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the overhead is not an exposition.; __UNKNOWN__