the corseting Orozco does not occur.
sent1: if the biographicness happens then the cautery occurs. sent2: the cautery does not occur if the rift occurs. sent3: if the educationalness occurs then the biographicness occurs. sent4: that the systematization occurs causes the biographicness. sent5: that the corseting Orozco does not occur is brought about by that the intensifying manganite happens and/or the incriminating happens. sent6: that the educationalness occurs or the systematization or both is triggered by that the incriminating does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incriminating does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the educationalness occurs and/or the systematization occurs.; int1 & sent3 & sent4 -> int2: the biographicness happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the cautery occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the corseting Orozco does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the biographicness happens then the cautery occurs. sent2: the cautery does not occur if the rift occurs. sent3: if the educationalness occurs then the biographicness occurs. sent4: that the systematization occurs causes the biographicness. sent5: that the corseting Orozco does not occur is brought about by that the intensifying manganite happens and/or the incriminating happens. sent6: that the educationalness occurs or the systematization or both is triggered by that the incriminating does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incriminating does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the educationalness occurs and/or the systematization occurs.; int1 & sent3 & sent4 -> int2: the biographicness happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the cautery occurs.; __UNKNOWN__