that the Wheeler is a nosebag but it is not a Hamitic if the enterolith is not forceful is not right.
sent1: the felucca is not forceful. sent2: if that the messmate is a Hamitic is correct the fact that the mansard is not interdisciplinary but it is pointless is false. sent3: the policewoman is not point-of-sale. sent4: if something is not three-piece it is a dating. sent5: the messmate is not a gong if there exists something such that that it is not a nosebag but a Ron is wrong. sent6: if the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary it is thrifty. sent7: the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary if that the messmate is both not a Ron and not interdisciplinary is not correct. sent8: the fact that the Wheeler is both a Hamitic and not forceful does not hold. sent9: that the messmate is not a Ron and it is not interdisciplinary is incorrect. sent10: the mansard is both pointless and non-forceful. sent11: if something is not interdisciplinary then it is thrifty. sent12: something is a kind of a nosebag that is thrifty if that it is not interdisciplinary is not incorrect. sent13: that the fact that the messmate is not forceful but it is interdisciplinary hold is wrong. sent14: the fact that the enterolith is not a gong hold. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is a gong and it is pointless is not true. sent16: the Wheeler is a kind of a Hamitic and it is interdisciplinary if it is not a Ron. sent17: the Wheeler is not a Hamitic if there is something such that the fact that it is not a gong but pointless does not hold. sent18: the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary if the messmate is a Ron. sent19: if the enterolith is not forceful then that the mansard is not a kind of a gong but it is pointless does not hold. sent20: something is both not a gong and not pointed. sent21: the Wheeler is thrifty.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enterolith is non-forceful.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: that the mansard is not a gong and is pointless does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a gong and it is pointless is not true.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the Wheeler is not a Hamitic.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary is correct it is a nosebag and it is not non-thrifty.; sent7 & sent9 -> int5: the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Wheeler is both a nosebag and thrifty.; int6 -> int7: the Wheeler is a nosebag.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the Wheeler is a nosebag and not a Hamitic.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Wheeler is a nosebag but it is not a Hamitic if the enterolith is not forceful is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the felucca is not forceful. sent2: if that the messmate is a Hamitic is correct the fact that the mansard is not interdisciplinary but it is pointless is false. sent3: the policewoman is not point-of-sale. sent4: if something is not three-piece it is a dating. sent5: the messmate is not a gong if there exists something such that that it is not a nosebag but a Ron is wrong. sent6: if the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary it is thrifty. sent7: the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary if that the messmate is both not a Ron and not interdisciplinary is not correct. sent8: the fact that the Wheeler is both a Hamitic and not forceful does not hold. sent9: that the messmate is not a Ron and it is not interdisciplinary is incorrect. sent10: the mansard is both pointless and non-forceful. sent11: if something is not interdisciplinary then it is thrifty. sent12: something is a kind of a nosebag that is thrifty if that it is not interdisciplinary is not incorrect. sent13: that the fact that the messmate is not forceful but it is interdisciplinary hold is wrong. sent14: the fact that the enterolith is not a gong hold. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is a gong and it is pointless is not true. sent16: the Wheeler is a kind of a Hamitic and it is interdisciplinary if it is not a Ron. sent17: the Wheeler is not a Hamitic if there is something such that the fact that it is not a gong but pointless does not hold. sent18: the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary if the messmate is a Ron. sent19: if the enterolith is not forceful then that the mansard is not a kind of a gong but it is pointless does not hold. sent20: something is both not a gong and not pointed. sent21: the Wheeler is thrifty. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enterolith is non-forceful.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: that the mansard is not a gong and is pointless does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a gong and it is pointless is not true.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the Wheeler is not a Hamitic.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary is correct it is a nosebag and it is not non-thrifty.; sent7 & sent9 -> int5: the Wheeler is not interdisciplinary.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Wheeler is both a nosebag and thrifty.; int6 -> int7: the Wheeler is a nosebag.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the Wheeler is a nosebag and not a Hamitic.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__