the failing shrike does not occur.
sent1: the yachting does not occur. sent2: that the Tasmanianness does not occur is prevented by the clannishness. sent3: that the defeasibleness occurs and the heavenliness happens is brought about by that the barring buckskins does not occur. sent4: if the barring chumminess happens then the fact that the Koranicness does not occur and the barring Proudhon does not occur is not true. sent5: the comicness triggers that the staggering oximeter does not occur and the failing trademarked does not occur. sent6: if the staggering oximeter does not occur then the androgenicness does not occur. sent7: that the imbricating does not occur and the Tasmanianness does not occur is triggered by the defeasibleness. sent8: the non-androgenicness leads to that the barring buckskins does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the Koranicness does not occur and the barring Proudhon does not occur does not hold then the Koranicness occurs. sent10: the non-impressionableness is prevented by that the Tasmanianness does not occur and/or that the clannishness does not occur. sent11: if the Tasmanianness does not occur that the clannishness does not occur and the failing shrike does not occur is incorrect. sent12: the clannishness happens. sent13: the fact that the imbricating occurs hold. sent14: the comicness is triggered by that the Koranicness occurs. sent15: that both the imbricating and the Tasmanianness occurs prevents the failing shrike.
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the Tasmanianness occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the imbricating and the Tasmanianness occurs.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the impressionableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the failing shrike does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the yachting does not occur. sent2: that the Tasmanianness does not occur is prevented by the clannishness. sent3: that the defeasibleness occurs and the heavenliness happens is brought about by that the barring buckskins does not occur. sent4: if the barring chumminess happens then the fact that the Koranicness does not occur and the barring Proudhon does not occur is not true. sent5: the comicness triggers that the staggering oximeter does not occur and the failing trademarked does not occur. sent6: if the staggering oximeter does not occur then the androgenicness does not occur. sent7: that the imbricating does not occur and the Tasmanianness does not occur is triggered by the defeasibleness. sent8: the non-androgenicness leads to that the barring buckskins does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the Koranicness does not occur and the barring Proudhon does not occur does not hold then the Koranicness occurs. sent10: the non-impressionableness is prevented by that the Tasmanianness does not occur and/or that the clannishness does not occur. sent11: if the Tasmanianness does not occur that the clannishness does not occur and the failing shrike does not occur is incorrect. sent12: the clannishness happens. sent13: the fact that the imbricating occurs hold. sent14: the comicness is triggered by that the Koranicness occurs. sent15: that both the imbricating and the Tasmanianness occurs prevents the failing shrike. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the Tasmanianness occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the imbricating and the Tasmanianness occurs.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__