the scramming cubby occurs but the decolonizing booger does not occur.
sent1: the karaoke does not occur. sent2: if the scramming cubby occurs but the decolonizing booger does not occur then the fact that the outsailing siamese happens is not wrong. sent3: if the ectomorphicness but not the stealing girl happens then the scramming rearguard happens. sent4: the decolonizing eunuch does not occur but the decolonizing alligator occurs. sent5: that the tribuneship and the non-anagogicness occurs does not hold. sent6: the scramming cubby and the posting occurs. sent7: the tastelessness occurs. sent8: that the redetermination happens is triggered by that the sweet but not the decolonizing coal occurs. sent9: the outsailing siamese does not occur and the tympaniticness happens. sent10: the fact that the scramming variable but not the anodicness happens is incorrect. sent11: the billet occurs. sent12: that the swing but not the sociolinguisticsness happens yields that the oath occurs. sent13: if the billet happens but the cannonade does not occur then the coexisting happens. sent14: the fact that both the decolonizing revolution and the non-adnexalness happens does not hold. sent15: if the multinucleateness happens but the feud does not occur then the buccalness happens. sent16: that the facelessness happens and the stealing hermit does not occur prevents the non-sabbaticalness. sent17: the coreferentialness happens. sent18: the outsailing test does not occur. sent19: the disorganization does not occur but the coexisting happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the scramming cubby happens and the decolonizing booger does not occur is not false.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the outsailing siamese occurs.; sent9 -> int2: the outsailing siamese does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the scramming cubby occurs and the decolonizing booger does not occur.
sent6 -> int4: the scramming cubby occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the scramming cubby occurs but the decolonizing booger does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the karaoke does not occur. sent2: if the scramming cubby occurs but the decolonizing booger does not occur then the fact that the outsailing siamese happens is not wrong. sent3: if the ectomorphicness but not the stealing girl happens then the scramming rearguard happens. sent4: the decolonizing eunuch does not occur but the decolonizing alligator occurs. sent5: that the tribuneship and the non-anagogicness occurs does not hold. sent6: the scramming cubby and the posting occurs. sent7: the tastelessness occurs. sent8: that the redetermination happens is triggered by that the sweet but not the decolonizing coal occurs. sent9: the outsailing siamese does not occur and the tympaniticness happens. sent10: the fact that the scramming variable but not the anodicness happens is incorrect. sent11: the billet occurs. sent12: that the swing but not the sociolinguisticsness happens yields that the oath occurs. sent13: if the billet happens but the cannonade does not occur then the coexisting happens. sent14: the fact that both the decolonizing revolution and the non-adnexalness happens does not hold. sent15: if the multinucleateness happens but the feud does not occur then the buccalness happens. sent16: that the facelessness happens and the stealing hermit does not occur prevents the non-sabbaticalness. sent17: the coreferentialness happens. sent18: the outsailing test does not occur. sent19: the disorganization does not occur but the coexisting happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the scramming cubby happens and the decolonizing booger does not occur is not false.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the outsailing siamese occurs.; sent9 -> int2: the outsailing siamese does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__