the whippersnapper does not unstrap purpose.
sent1: if something does not heterodyne and it is not deconstructionist it does unstrap purpose. sent2: the whippersnapper is an educator and it is proper if the community does not jack grounder. sent3: if something is either not a victory or a loading or both it does not jack grounder. sent4: if the sauerbraten is a kind of torrential an educator then the whippersnapper does not unstrap purpose. sent5: the fact that the sauerbraten is not improper is correct. sent6: if the sauerbraten is proper then that it is not an educator and does jack grounder is not true. sent7: the community jacks grounder. sent8: the sauerbraten is torrential if the community is deconstructionist. sent9: something is a kind of non-heterodyne thing that is not deconstructionist if it is torrential. sent10: if the whippersnapper is a kind of an educator it is torrential. sent11: the community is both deconstructionist and heterodyne.
sent11 -> int1: the community is not non-deconstructionist.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the sauerbraten is torrential is true.; sent6 & sent5 -> int3: that the sauerbraten is not a kind of an educator and jacks grounder is not right.;
the whippersnapper does unstrap purpose.
sent1 -> int4: the whippersnapper does unstrap purpose if it is both not heterodyne and not deconstructionist.; sent9 -> int5: the whippersnapper is a kind of non-heterodyne thing that is not deconstructionist if it is torrential.; sent3 -> int6: the community does not jack grounder if either it is not a victory or it loads or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the whippersnapper does not unstrap purpose. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not heterodyne and it is not deconstructionist it does unstrap purpose. sent2: the whippersnapper is an educator and it is proper if the community does not jack grounder. sent3: if something is either not a victory or a loading or both it does not jack grounder. sent4: if the sauerbraten is a kind of torrential an educator then the whippersnapper does not unstrap purpose. sent5: the fact that the sauerbraten is not improper is correct. sent6: if the sauerbraten is proper then that it is not an educator and does jack grounder is not true. sent7: the community jacks grounder. sent8: the sauerbraten is torrential if the community is deconstructionist. sent9: something is a kind of non-heterodyne thing that is not deconstructionist if it is torrential. sent10: if the whippersnapper is a kind of an educator it is torrential. sent11: the community is both deconstructionist and heterodyne. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the community is not non-deconstructionist.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the sauerbraten is torrential is true.; sent6 & sent5 -> int3: that the sauerbraten is not a kind of an educator and jacks grounder is not right.; __UNKNOWN__