the fact that the chopsteak is non-eonian thing that is a paper does not hold.
sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a habited but it is not Neapolitan is not right if it is not a kind of a rebate. sent2: the feldspar is calcic if that it squawks homer and it is not Dantean does not hold. sent3: if the amnion is calcic the feldspar is not a kind of a rebate. sent4: if there exists something such that it is prolusory and it is calcic the amnion is not estuarine. sent5: the fact that the feldspar does squawk homer but it is not Dantean is wrong. sent6: the amnion is not a rebate if the part is a kind of a mastalgia. sent7: the part is a mastalgia. sent8: if the fact that the feldspar is not prolusory is not incorrect then the fact that the chopsteak is non-eonian thing that papers is not correct.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the feldspar is calcic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the feldspar is prolusory.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the feldspar is both prolusory and calcic.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is prolusory and it is calcic.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the amnion is not estuarine hold.; sent1 -> int5: that the amnion is a habited but not Neapolitan is incorrect if it is not a rebate.; sent6 & sent7 -> int6: the amnion is not a kind of a rebate.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the amnion is a kind of a habited and is not a Neapolitan does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chopsteak is non-eonian thing that is a paper does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a habited but it is not Neapolitan is not right if it is not a kind of a rebate. sent2: the feldspar is calcic if that it squawks homer and it is not Dantean does not hold. sent3: if the amnion is calcic the feldspar is not a kind of a rebate. sent4: if there exists something such that it is prolusory and it is calcic the amnion is not estuarine. sent5: the fact that the feldspar does squawk homer but it is not Dantean is wrong. sent6: the amnion is not a rebate if the part is a kind of a mastalgia. sent7: the part is a mastalgia. sent8: if the fact that the feldspar is not prolusory is not incorrect then the fact that the chopsteak is non-eonian thing that papers is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the feldspar is calcic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the feldspar is prolusory.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the feldspar is both prolusory and calcic.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is prolusory and it is calcic.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the amnion is not estuarine hold.; sent1 -> int5: that the amnion is a habited but not Neapolitan is incorrect if it is not a rebate.; sent6 & sent7 -> int6: the amnion is not a kind of a rebate.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the amnion is a kind of a habited and is not a Neapolitan does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__