the fact that there exists something such that if it is nonpasserine and not an optimism it is adactylous is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a relativism and it is arthromeric then it is not non-parallel. sent2: there exists something such that if it is an adjudication and not electrochemical it does electrify. sent3: there is something such that if it is both not passerine and an optimism it is adactylous. sent4: if the munjeet is nonpasserine thing that is not a kind of an optimism it is adactylous. sent5: something is fiscal if it is a Trichechus and it is not a kind of a electromyogram. sent6: if the munjeet is a tack that does not clear gobbledygook then it is adactylous.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a Trichechus that is not a kind of a electromyogram then it is fiscal.
sent5 -> int1: the sculptress is fiscal if it is a Trichechus but not a electromyogram.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is nonpasserine and not an optimism it is adactylous is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a relativism and it is arthromeric then it is not non-parallel. sent2: there exists something such that if it is an adjudication and not electrochemical it does electrify. sent3: there is something such that if it is both not passerine and an optimism it is adactylous. sent4: if the munjeet is nonpasserine thing that is not a kind of an optimism it is adactylous. sent5: something is fiscal if it is a Trichechus and it is not a kind of a electromyogram. sent6: if the munjeet is a tack that does not clear gobbledygook then it is adactylous. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__