the fact that there exists something such that if it does not neglect pointer it is not a oxidase and is not a kind of a flashing is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not neglect pointer then it is not a oxidase but a flashing. sent2: the toadflax is not a oxidase and not a flashing if it does not neglect pointer. sent3: if something is not a kind of an aphrodisiac it does not sentimentalise chrysoprase and it is not a kind of a oxidase. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a pickled then it does not rationalize Fosbury and is not dimmed. sent5: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Edwardian is not wrong that it does not neglect PIN and is not a kind of a fret is correct is right. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not neglect masthead then it is not a kind of a pop and does not rationalize trimer. sent7: the pothead is not an antecedent and it is not tubercular if it is a scrumpy. sent8: the toadflax is a oxidase but not a flashing if it does not neglect pointer. sent9: that there is something such that if it does not rationalize Fosbury it is not gonadal and it is not milch is true. sent10: there is something such that if it does not rationalize pothead then it is not Anglican and it does not rationalize Fosbury. sent11: if the toadflax does not neglect pointer then it is not a flashing. sent12: if the toadflax does neglect pointer it is both not a oxidase and not a flashing. sent13: the toadflax does not sentimentalise bladder and is a oxidase if it does not neglect oxalacetate. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a Melicoccus it is not a coarctation and it is not a kind of a Phocidae. sent15: there is something such that if it does not neglect pointer then it is not a flashing. sent16: the toadflax is not a eightpence if it is not a Heterocephalus. sent17: there is something such that if it does neglect pointer then it is not a oxidase and not a flashing. sent18: there exists something such that if it does not neglect pointer it is a kind of a oxidase that is not a flashing. sent19: there exists something such that if that it does not neglect pointer is true it is not a oxidase. sent20: there exists something such that if it does not sentimentalise Sumerian then it is not a borated. sent21: something does not sentimentalise grizzly and it is not a angledozer if it does not sentimentalise Thatcherism.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the trimer is not an aphrodisiac that it does not sentimentalise chrysoprase and is not a oxidase is correct.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not neglect pointer it is not a oxidase and is not a kind of a flashing is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not neglect pointer then it is not a oxidase but a flashing. sent2: the toadflax is not a oxidase and not a flashing if it does not neglect pointer. sent3: if something is not a kind of an aphrodisiac it does not sentimentalise chrysoprase and it is not a kind of a oxidase. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a pickled then it does not rationalize Fosbury and is not dimmed. sent5: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Edwardian is not wrong that it does not neglect PIN and is not a kind of a fret is correct is right. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not neglect masthead then it is not a kind of a pop and does not rationalize trimer. sent7: the pothead is not an antecedent and it is not tubercular if it is a scrumpy. sent8: the toadflax is a oxidase but not a flashing if it does not neglect pointer. sent9: that there is something such that if it does not rationalize Fosbury it is not gonadal and it is not milch is true. sent10: there is something such that if it does not rationalize pothead then it is not Anglican and it does not rationalize Fosbury. sent11: if the toadflax does not neglect pointer then it is not a flashing. sent12: if the toadflax does neglect pointer it is both not a oxidase and not a flashing. sent13: the toadflax does not sentimentalise bladder and is a oxidase if it does not neglect oxalacetate. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a Melicoccus it is not a coarctation and it is not a kind of a Phocidae. sent15: there is something such that if it does not neglect pointer then it is not a flashing. sent16: the toadflax is not a eightpence if it is not a Heterocephalus. sent17: there is something such that if it does neglect pointer then it is not a oxidase and not a flashing. sent18: there exists something such that if it does not neglect pointer it is a kind of a oxidase that is not a flashing. sent19: there exists something such that if that it does not neglect pointer is true it is not a oxidase. sent20: there exists something such that if it does not sentimentalise Sumerian then it is not a borated. sent21: something does not sentimentalise grizzly and it is not a angledozer if it does not sentimentalise Thatcherism. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__