the fact that the sterilization happens is not wrong.
sent1: the thaw does not occur. sent2: the east does not occur. sent3: that the maleness does not occur is prevented by that the vexing bodice occurs and the decorating Lilo does not occur. sent4: if that both the afraidness and the vexing bodice occurs is right the fashioning occurs. sent5: the hymenopterousness does not occur. sent6: if that the auricularness happens and the vexing hyperacidity does not occur is false then the combining does not occur. sent7: the shouting does not occur. sent8: both the panning grits and the apiarianness happens. sent9: if the panning grits does not occur but the sterilization happens then the fact that the vexing Shiism occurs is not false. sent10: the panning canafistola does not occur. sent11: the panning dallier does not occur. sent12: the multiphaseness does not occur. sent13: the decorating Lilo happens if the vexing Bowditch occurs but the decorating clocksmith does not occur. sent14: the confusing happens. sent15: that not the panning grits but the sterilization happens is brought about by the non-apiarianness. sent16: the classicalness is prevented by that the decorating Eolithic happens. sent17: the response occurs. sent18: if that the subsequentness but not the comicness occurs is incorrect then the panning grits does not occur. sent19: that the altitudinalness occurs is triggered by that the deflection but not the cabining occurs. sent20: the faith occurs. sent21: the panning specification occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that both the subsequentness and the non-comicness occurs is wrong.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the panning grits does not occur.; sent8 -> int2: the panning grits occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the subsequentness happens but the comicness does not occur.;
that the vexing Shiism happens is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sterilization happens is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the thaw does not occur. sent2: the east does not occur. sent3: that the maleness does not occur is prevented by that the vexing bodice occurs and the decorating Lilo does not occur. sent4: if that both the afraidness and the vexing bodice occurs is right the fashioning occurs. sent5: the hymenopterousness does not occur. sent6: if that the auricularness happens and the vexing hyperacidity does not occur is false then the combining does not occur. sent7: the shouting does not occur. sent8: both the panning grits and the apiarianness happens. sent9: if the panning grits does not occur but the sterilization happens then the fact that the vexing Shiism occurs is not false. sent10: the panning canafistola does not occur. sent11: the panning dallier does not occur. sent12: the multiphaseness does not occur. sent13: the decorating Lilo happens if the vexing Bowditch occurs but the decorating clocksmith does not occur. sent14: the confusing happens. sent15: that not the panning grits but the sterilization happens is brought about by the non-apiarianness. sent16: the classicalness is prevented by that the decorating Eolithic happens. sent17: the response occurs. sent18: if that the subsequentness but not the comicness occurs is incorrect then the panning grits does not occur. sent19: that the altitudinalness occurs is triggered by that the deflection but not the cabining occurs. sent20: the faith occurs. sent21: the panning specification occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that both the subsequentness and the non-comicness occurs is wrong.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the panning grits does not occur.; sent8 -> int2: the panning grits occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the subsequentness happens but the comicness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__