the pellicle is a alloyed and constructs semidarkness.
sent1: that the pellicle is not a alloyed and it is not a kind of a Depression is not correct. sent2: if that the pellicle is not a yield and does not stickle is not correct it is a kind of a alloyed. sent3: the ambassador is not a kind of a slip. sent4: the fact that the pellicle wraps abomasum but it does not construct semidarkness does not hold. sent5: if the fact that that something does not hunger prescription but it does stickle is right does not hold it does hunger prescription. sent6: the sneak is a kind of a Depression. sent7: the abomasum is a kind of a general that is a alloyed. sent8: the fact that the pellicle is a yield but it does not stickle is not correct. sent9: the fact that the pellicle is not a yield and does not stickle is not correct if the bandsman is a Depression. sent10: if something is not a textbook the fact that it does not hunger prescription and stickles is incorrect. sent11: the ambassador is not a kind of a yield if it does not slip. sent12: the receptor is not a kind of a textbook if the fact that that it is not dacitic and it is not mesonic hold is wrong. sent13: if something constructs semidarkness the pellicle hungers prescription. sent14: the pellicle does wrap peptone. sent15: if the receptor does construct semidarkness then the pellicle construct semidarkness. sent16: the fact that the pellicle is not a yield but it stickles is false if the fact that the bandsman is a kind of a Depression is correct. sent17: there exists something such that it does not wrap peptone and/or it is a quarantine. sent18: the bandsman is a Depression if it hungers prescription. sent19: The semidarkness does construct receptor. sent20: there exists something such that it alloys and/or constructs semidarkness. sent21: the bandsman does stickle. sent22: the receptor does construct semidarkness. sent23: the bandsman does alloy if it is a Depression. sent24: if the pellicle stickles then the bandsman stickles. sent25: the fact that the bandsman does not alloy and it does not construct semidarkness is incorrect if the pellicle is a Depression. sent26: the fact that the receptor is not dacitic and it is non-mesonic is not correct. sent27: if there exists something such that it does not yield the receptor is not a Depression.
sent15 & sent22 -> int1: the pellicle constructs semidarkness.;
the fact that the pellicle alloys and it constructs semidarkness is wrong.
sent11 & sent3 -> int2: the ambassador is not a kind of a yield.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a yield.; int3 & sent27 -> int4: the receptor is not a kind of a Depression.; sent5 -> int5: if that the receptor does not hunger prescription but it does stickle does not hold then it hunger prescription.; sent10 -> int6: if the receptor is not a textbook then that it does not hunger prescription and stickles does not hold.; sent12 & sent26 -> int7: the receptor is not a textbook.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the receptor does not hunger prescription but it stickles is not right.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the receptor hungers prescription.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the receptor is not a Depression but it does hunger prescription.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is not a Depression and does hunger prescription.;
$hypothesis$ = the pellicle is a alloyed and constructs semidarkness. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pellicle is not a alloyed and it is not a kind of a Depression is not correct. sent2: if that the pellicle is not a yield and does not stickle is not correct it is a kind of a alloyed. sent3: the ambassador is not a kind of a slip. sent4: the fact that the pellicle wraps abomasum but it does not construct semidarkness does not hold. sent5: if the fact that that something does not hunger prescription but it does stickle is right does not hold it does hunger prescription. sent6: the sneak is a kind of a Depression. sent7: the abomasum is a kind of a general that is a alloyed. sent8: the fact that the pellicle is a yield but it does not stickle is not correct. sent9: the fact that the pellicle is not a yield and does not stickle is not correct if the bandsman is a Depression. sent10: if something is not a textbook the fact that it does not hunger prescription and stickles is incorrect. sent11: the ambassador is not a kind of a yield if it does not slip. sent12: the receptor is not a kind of a textbook if the fact that that it is not dacitic and it is not mesonic hold is wrong. sent13: if something constructs semidarkness the pellicle hungers prescription. sent14: the pellicle does wrap peptone. sent15: if the receptor does construct semidarkness then the pellicle construct semidarkness. sent16: the fact that the pellicle is not a yield but it stickles is false if the fact that the bandsman is a kind of a Depression is correct. sent17: there exists something such that it does not wrap peptone and/or it is a quarantine. sent18: the bandsman is a Depression if it hungers prescription. sent19: The semidarkness does construct receptor. sent20: there exists something such that it alloys and/or constructs semidarkness. sent21: the bandsman does stickle. sent22: the receptor does construct semidarkness. sent23: the bandsman does alloy if it is a Depression. sent24: if the pellicle stickles then the bandsman stickles. sent25: the fact that the bandsman does not alloy and it does not construct semidarkness is incorrect if the pellicle is a Depression. sent26: the fact that the receptor is not dacitic and it is non-mesonic is not correct. sent27: if there exists something such that it does not yield the receptor is not a Depression. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent22 -> int1: the pellicle constructs semidarkness.; __UNKNOWN__