the fact that the jute is a gabapentin and does incarnate is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is authorial and it does not upgrade epigone does not hold. sent2: if the flier is not syndetic then that it is a probable that is a keeshond does not hold. sent3: the baa-lamb is not a gabapentin. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is authorial and does not upgrade epigone does not hold then the Millet is not a kind of a stuff. sent5: the fact that if the fact that the baa-lamb does not incarnate and/or does not upgrade typhus is not right then the jute incarnate is true. sent6: if the baa-lamb does not incarnate then the fact that the jute is a gabapentin that incarnate does not hold. sent7: that the epigone is not probable is true if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a probable that is a keeshond does not hold. sent8: the bank is both a coccidium and prosthodontics. sent9: if the bank is a gabapentin then the jute is a gabapentin. sent10: if the jute is a gabapentin and it is a coccidium that that the baa-lamb does incarnate is false is not wrong. sent11: the flier is not syndetic. sent12: the fact that something does not incarnate and/or it does not upgrade typhus is not true if it is not a gorgonzola. sent13: the bank is prosthodontics. sent14: the fact that if the fact that something is not a kind of a ortygan but it is a kind of a gorgonzola is not true then it is not a gorgonzola hold. sent15: the fact that something does upgrade hyperthyroidism but it is not a loudmouth is false if it is not a kind of a probable. sent16: the fact that the bank is a gabapentin is not wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it upgrades hyperthyroidism and it is not a kind of a loudmouth is not right. sent17: the bank does upgrade typhus.
the jute is a gabapentin and it does incarnate.
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the epigone upgrades hyperthyroidism but it is not a loudmouth does not hold if it is not a probable.; sent2 & sent11 -> int2: that the flier is a probable that is a keeshond is not right.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that the fact that it is a probable and is a keeshond hold is incorrect.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the epigone is a kind of a probable is false.; int1 & int4 -> int5: that the epigone does upgrade hyperthyroidism and is not a loudmouth is not right.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it upgrades hyperthyroidism and is not a loudmouth is not right.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the bank is a gabapentin.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the jute is a kind of a gabapentin.; sent12 -> int9: that the fact that the baa-lamb does not incarnate and/or it does not upgrade typhus is not false does not hold if it is not a gorgonzola.; sent14 -> int10: the baa-lamb is not a gorgonzola if that it is not a ortygan and it is a gorgonzola is false.; sent1 & sent4 -> int11: that the Millet is not a stuff is not false.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is not a stuff.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the jute is a gabapentin and does incarnate is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is authorial and it does not upgrade epigone does not hold. sent2: if the flier is not syndetic then that it is a probable that is a keeshond does not hold. sent3: the baa-lamb is not a gabapentin. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is authorial and does not upgrade epigone does not hold then the Millet is not a kind of a stuff. sent5: the fact that if the fact that the baa-lamb does not incarnate and/or does not upgrade typhus is not right then the jute incarnate is true. sent6: if the baa-lamb does not incarnate then the fact that the jute is a gabapentin that incarnate does not hold. sent7: that the epigone is not probable is true if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a probable that is a keeshond does not hold. sent8: the bank is both a coccidium and prosthodontics. sent9: if the bank is a gabapentin then the jute is a gabapentin. sent10: if the jute is a gabapentin and it is a coccidium that that the baa-lamb does incarnate is false is not wrong. sent11: the flier is not syndetic. sent12: the fact that something does not incarnate and/or it does not upgrade typhus is not true if it is not a gorgonzola. sent13: the bank is prosthodontics. sent14: the fact that if the fact that something is not a kind of a ortygan but it is a kind of a gorgonzola is not true then it is not a gorgonzola hold. sent15: the fact that something does upgrade hyperthyroidism but it is not a loudmouth is false if it is not a kind of a probable. sent16: the fact that the bank is a gabapentin is not wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it upgrades hyperthyroidism and it is not a kind of a loudmouth is not right. sent17: the bank does upgrade typhus. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__