the coronion is a consumptive that is a luger.
sent1: the coronion is a luger that is earlier. sent2: something is not a kind of a luger but it is earlier if it is not a Micrurus. sent3: something does not plume if that it does not bay and is not a chad is not correct. sent4: the coronion is earlier. sent5: if something is not a kind of a luger but it is earlier it is a consumptive. sent6: if something is a plume it drags giver. sent7: if something is not earlier then that it is a kind of a consumptive and is a luger is incorrect. sent8: the coronion is a fence. sent9: the coronion is a kind of a luger if the angledozer is consumptive. sent10: if the coronion is a nutrient the fact that it is not a bay and it is not a coronary is not true. sent11: if something is a chad then it plumes. sent12: that the angledozer is not a plume is wrong. sent13: if the fact that the angledozer is not a kind of a nutrient and drags flyover is incorrect the coronion is a nutrient. sent14: the handstamp is not a Micrurus if that it is both a gonioscopy and not a brawl is wrong. sent15: that the handstamp is a gonioscopy that does not brawl is wrong. sent16: the coronion is a kind of a consumptive if the angledozer plumes. sent17: the fact that the angledozer is not a nutrient but it drags flyover does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: the coronion is a luger.; sent16 & sent12 -> int2: the coronion is a kind of a consumptive.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the coronion is consumptive and it is a luger is wrong.
sent7 -> int3: the fact that the coronion is a kind of a consumptive and it is a kind of a luger is wrong if it is not earlier.; sent3 -> int4: the fact that the angledozer is not a plume is not false if the fact that that it does not bay and it is not a chad hold is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the coronion is a consumptive that is a luger. ; $context$ = sent1: the coronion is a luger that is earlier. sent2: something is not a kind of a luger but it is earlier if it is not a Micrurus. sent3: something does not plume if that it does not bay and is not a chad is not correct. sent4: the coronion is earlier. sent5: if something is not a kind of a luger but it is earlier it is a consumptive. sent6: if something is a plume it drags giver. sent7: if something is not earlier then that it is a kind of a consumptive and is a luger is incorrect. sent8: the coronion is a fence. sent9: the coronion is a kind of a luger if the angledozer is consumptive. sent10: if the coronion is a nutrient the fact that it is not a bay and it is not a coronary is not true. sent11: if something is a chad then it plumes. sent12: that the angledozer is not a plume is wrong. sent13: if the fact that the angledozer is not a kind of a nutrient and drags flyover is incorrect the coronion is a nutrient. sent14: the handstamp is not a Micrurus if that it is both a gonioscopy and not a brawl is wrong. sent15: that the handstamp is a gonioscopy that does not brawl is wrong. sent16: the coronion is a kind of a consumptive if the angledozer plumes. sent17: the fact that the angledozer is not a nutrient but it drags flyover does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the coronion is a luger.; sent16 & sent12 -> int2: the coronion is a kind of a consumptive.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__