there is something such that if it does not seel then it is not a plantigrade.
sent1: something is not a kind of a suggester but it is a kind of a plantigrade if it does not seel. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not seel then it is a plantigrade. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is fluvial and it is not pietistic is incorrect the tuft does not seel. sent4: the Gable is not a suggester if the tuft is not a suggester. sent5: the bluehead does annex and it does look Jew. sent6: something is clonal if it looks Jew. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of fluvial thing that is non-pietistic is not right if it is not non-clonal. sent8: there is something such that if it seels then it is not a plantigrade. sent9: if the Gable does seel then it is not a plantigrade.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Gable is plantigrade.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gable does not seel.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the Gable is a plantigrade but it does not seel.;
the Gable is not a suggester.
sent1 -> int2: the tuft is both not a suggester and plantigrade if it does not seel.; sent7 -> int3: if the bluehead is clonal that it is fluvial and it is not pietistic is not true.; sent6 -> int4: that the bluehead is clonal is correct if it looks Jew.; sent5 -> int5: the bluehead looks Jew.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bluehead is clonal.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the bluehead is both fluvial and not pietistic does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is fluvial and is not pietistic is not true.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the tuft does not seel.; int2 & int9 -> int10: the tuft is not a suggester and is plantigrade.; int10 -> int11: the tuft is not a kind of a suggester.; sent4 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not seel then it is not a plantigrade. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a suggester but it is a kind of a plantigrade if it does not seel. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not seel then it is a plantigrade. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is fluvial and it is not pietistic is incorrect the tuft does not seel. sent4: the Gable is not a suggester if the tuft is not a suggester. sent5: the bluehead does annex and it does look Jew. sent6: something is clonal if it looks Jew. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of fluvial thing that is non-pietistic is not right if it is not non-clonal. sent8: there is something such that if it seels then it is not a plantigrade. sent9: if the Gable does seel then it is not a plantigrade. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Gable is plantigrade.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gable does not seel.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the Gable is a plantigrade but it does not seel.; __UNKNOWN__