the Bovril is not monotheistic.
sent1: that the spadefoot is non-apophyseal thing that does not utter nephropathy is not right. sent2: if that the spadefoot is not apophyseal and does not utter nephropathy is false then it does not date acantholysis. sent3: if the absinth is not a kind of a Kaaba then the fact that the T-bar is not a Kaaba or it does unveil NSC or both is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a Kaaba and/or is sternutatory is incorrect. sent5: the absinth is not a Kaaba if the fact that the spadefoot does not volunteer but it is not non-sternutatory is not right. sent6: the Bovril is not monotheistic if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Kaaba and/or does unveil NSC is wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not date acantholysis that that the antinode date acantholysis and does not utter timetable is true is wrong. sent8: that the antinode is not sternutatory is not incorrect if something is non-humanist and/or it is not an ocean. sent9: a sternutatory thing is monotheistic. sent10: there exists something such that it is not humanist and/or it is not an ocean. sent11: the antinode does not unveil NSC if the fact that it does date acantholysis and does not utter timetable is not right.
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the antinode is not sternutatory.;
the Bovril is monotheistic.
sent9 -> int2: if the Bovril is sternutatory it is monotheistic.; sent2 & sent1 -> int3: the spadefoot does not date acantholysis.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does not date acantholysis.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the antinode does date acantholysis but it does not utter timetable is false.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the antinode does not unveil NSC.;
$hypothesis$ = the Bovril is not monotheistic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the spadefoot is non-apophyseal thing that does not utter nephropathy is not right. sent2: if that the spadefoot is not apophyseal and does not utter nephropathy is false then it does not date acantholysis. sent3: if the absinth is not a kind of a Kaaba then the fact that the T-bar is not a Kaaba or it does unveil NSC or both is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a Kaaba and/or is sternutatory is incorrect. sent5: the absinth is not a Kaaba if the fact that the spadefoot does not volunteer but it is not non-sternutatory is not right. sent6: the Bovril is not monotheistic if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Kaaba and/or does unveil NSC is wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not date acantholysis that that the antinode date acantholysis and does not utter timetable is true is wrong. sent8: that the antinode is not sternutatory is not incorrect if something is non-humanist and/or it is not an ocean. sent9: a sternutatory thing is monotheistic. sent10: there exists something such that it is not humanist and/or it is not an ocean. sent11: the antinode does not unveil NSC if the fact that it does date acantholysis and does not utter timetable is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the antinode is not sternutatory.; __UNKNOWN__