the tegularness does not occur.
sent1: the radiance occurs if the citifying strafer happens. sent2: that the pluralism does not occur is prevented by that the domiciliariness does not occur. sent3: if the sideline occurs the jack-o'-lantern does not occur and the Gibraltarian does not occur. sent4: the citifying durance does not occur and the tegularness occurs if the luminescing does not occur. sent5: not the citifying signal-to-noise but the subscript happens. sent6: if the pluralism does not occur then that the domiciliariness and the non-tegularness occurs is not true. sent7: the postalness happens if the mayoralty occurs. sent8: if the pluralism happens and the Malianness occurs then the radiance does not occur. sent9: if the citifying strafer does not occur the fact that the jack-o'-lantern occurs and the Gibraltarian does not occur is not true. sent10: that not the citifying signal-to-noise but the subscript occurs prevents the domiciliariness. sent11: the citifying strafer happens. sent12: if the pluralism does not occur both the Bismarckianness and the uncialness occurs. sent13: if both the citifying durance and the non-Malianness happens then the tegularness does not occur. sent14: if the jack-o'-lantern does not occur then the citifying durance happens and the luminescing happens. sent15: that the sideline occurs is true. sent16: if the domiciliariness happens the fact that that both the pluralism and the non-Malianness occurs is right is wrong.
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the domiciliariness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the pluralism occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Malianness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the pluralism and the Malianness happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the radiance does not occur.; sent1 & sent11 -> int5: the radiance happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Malianness does not occur.; sent3 & sent15 -> int8: the jack-o'-lantern does not occur and the Gibraltarianness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the jack-o'-lantern does not occur.; sent14 & int9 -> int10: the citifying durance happens and the luminescing happens.; int10 -> int11: that the citifying durance happens is not wrong.; int7 & int11 -> int12: both the citifying durance and the non-Malianness occurs.; int12 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the tegularness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the tegularness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the radiance occurs if the citifying strafer happens. sent2: that the pluralism does not occur is prevented by that the domiciliariness does not occur. sent3: if the sideline occurs the jack-o'-lantern does not occur and the Gibraltarian does not occur. sent4: the citifying durance does not occur and the tegularness occurs if the luminescing does not occur. sent5: not the citifying signal-to-noise but the subscript happens. sent6: if the pluralism does not occur then that the domiciliariness and the non-tegularness occurs is not true. sent7: the postalness happens if the mayoralty occurs. sent8: if the pluralism happens and the Malianness occurs then the radiance does not occur. sent9: if the citifying strafer does not occur the fact that the jack-o'-lantern occurs and the Gibraltarian does not occur is not true. sent10: that not the citifying signal-to-noise but the subscript occurs prevents the domiciliariness. sent11: the citifying strafer happens. sent12: if the pluralism does not occur both the Bismarckianness and the uncialness occurs. sent13: if both the citifying durance and the non-Malianness happens then the tegularness does not occur. sent14: if the jack-o'-lantern does not occur then the citifying durance happens and the luminescing happens. sent15: that the sideline occurs is true. sent16: if the domiciliariness happens the fact that that both the pluralism and the non-Malianness occurs is right is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the domiciliariness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the pluralism occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Malianness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the pluralism and the Malianness happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the radiance does not occur.; sent1 & sent11 -> int5: the radiance happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Malianness does not occur.; sent3 & sent15 -> int8: the jack-o'-lantern does not occur and the Gibraltarianness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the jack-o'-lantern does not occur.; sent14 & int9 -> int10: the citifying durance happens and the luminescing happens.; int10 -> int11: that the citifying durance happens is not wrong.; int7 & int11 -> int12: both the citifying durance and the non-Malianness occurs.; int12 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__