the bizonalness does not occur.
sent1: not the mobilization but the ascent occurs. sent2: if the staving biophysicist does not occur then the fact that the blacklisting ununpentium does not occur and the medullariness does not occur is false. sent3: if the walloping does not occur the contemplation occurs. sent4: that the path does not occur is brought about by that both the insult and the electronicness happens. sent5: the integumentariness does not occur if the blacklisting stater occurs and/or the blacklisting neckpiece does not occur. sent6: the fact that the casing occurs is not false. sent7: the casing does not occur if the fact that not the impinging Perodicticus but the peripateticness happens is not correct. sent8: the fact that the textileness does not occur and the vomit does not occur does not hold. sent9: that the path and the blacklisting ununpentium happens is brought about by that the soothing does not occur. sent10: the non-bizonalness is prevented by that not the path but the blacklisting ununpentium occurs. sent11: the staving biophysicist does not occur. sent12: the fact that the impinging Perodicticus does not occur and the peripateticness occurs is wrong if the insult does not occur. sent13: the fact that the contact occurs but the unmownness does not occur does not hold if the impinging ayapana does not occur. sent14: the bimetallisticness does not occur if the fact that the contact and the non-unmownness occurs is incorrect. sent15: the electronicness happens and the soothing happens if the promising does not occur. sent16: if the promising occurs then the medullariness does not occur and the soothing does not occur. sent17: the blacklisting ununpentium happens if that the blacklisting ununpentium does not occur and the medullariness does not occur is not true. sent18: that both the promising and the staving biophysicist occurs is brought about by the non-integumentariness. sent19: the blacklisting stater occurs and/or the blacklisting neckpiece does not occur if the nonreciprocalness does not occur. sent20: the reciprocalness and the non-Britonness happens if the bimetallisticness does not occur. sent21: that the casing occurs and the insult occurs is caused by the non-electronicness. sent22: the promising does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the insult does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the impinging Perodicticus does not occur and the peripatetic happens is wrong.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the casing does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the insult happens.; sent15 & sent22 -> int5: the electronicness occurs and the soothing occurs.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the electronicness happens hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the insult and the electronicness happens.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the path does not occur.; sent2 & sent11 -> int9: the fact that the blacklisting ununpentium does not occur and the medullariness does not occur does not hold.; sent17 & int9 -> int10: the blacklisting ununpentium occurs.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the path does not occur and the blacklisting ununpentium happens.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bizonalness does not occur is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the bizonalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: not the mobilization but the ascent occurs. sent2: if the staving biophysicist does not occur then the fact that the blacklisting ununpentium does not occur and the medullariness does not occur is false. sent3: if the walloping does not occur the contemplation occurs. sent4: that the path does not occur is brought about by that both the insult and the electronicness happens. sent5: the integumentariness does not occur if the blacklisting stater occurs and/or the blacklisting neckpiece does not occur. sent6: the fact that the casing occurs is not false. sent7: the casing does not occur if the fact that not the impinging Perodicticus but the peripateticness happens is not correct. sent8: the fact that the textileness does not occur and the vomit does not occur does not hold. sent9: that the path and the blacklisting ununpentium happens is brought about by that the soothing does not occur. sent10: the non-bizonalness is prevented by that not the path but the blacklisting ununpentium occurs. sent11: the staving biophysicist does not occur. sent12: the fact that the impinging Perodicticus does not occur and the peripateticness occurs is wrong if the insult does not occur. sent13: the fact that the contact occurs but the unmownness does not occur does not hold if the impinging ayapana does not occur. sent14: the bimetallisticness does not occur if the fact that the contact and the non-unmownness occurs is incorrect. sent15: the electronicness happens and the soothing happens if the promising does not occur. sent16: if the promising occurs then the medullariness does not occur and the soothing does not occur. sent17: the blacklisting ununpentium happens if that the blacklisting ununpentium does not occur and the medullariness does not occur is not true. sent18: that both the promising and the staving biophysicist occurs is brought about by the non-integumentariness. sent19: the blacklisting stater occurs and/or the blacklisting neckpiece does not occur if the nonreciprocalness does not occur. sent20: the reciprocalness and the non-Britonness happens if the bimetallisticness does not occur. sent21: that the casing occurs and the insult occurs is caused by the non-electronicness. sent22: the promising does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the insult does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the impinging Perodicticus does not occur and the peripatetic happens is wrong.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the casing does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the insult happens.; sent15 & sent22 -> int5: the electronicness occurs and the soothing occurs.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the electronicness happens hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the insult and the electronicness happens.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the path does not occur.; sent2 & sent11 -> int9: the fact that the blacklisting ununpentium does not occur and the medullariness does not occur does not hold.; sent17 & int9 -> int10: the blacklisting ununpentium occurs.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the path does not occur and the blacklisting ununpentium happens.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__