the fact that the newspapering does not occur and the haircare does not occur if the trailing occurs does not hold.
sent1: not the haircare but the newspapering occurs if the supererogation does not occur. sent2: the conventionalizing ship is prevented by that not the haircare but the newspapering happens. sent3: the posting occurs. sent4: if both the fossilizing and the scorch occurs the fact that the supererogation does not occur is true. sent5: the newspapering does not occur and the haircare does not occur if the conventionalizing ship occurs. sent6: the impersonalness happens. sent7: the newspapering does not occur. sent8: if the conventionalizing ship occurs then not the newspapering but the haircare occurs. sent9: the newspapering does not occur if the conventionalizing ship happens. sent10: the newspapering does not occur but the haircare happens. sent11: if the trailing happens then that the conventionalizing ship occurs is not incorrect. sent12: the newspapering does not occur and the haircare occurs if the trailing happens. sent13: the ultramicroscopicness does not occur and the clutching does not occur. sent14: the fossilizing happens. sent15: the newspapering does not occur if the trailing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trailing occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the conventionalizing ship happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the newspapering does not occur and the haircare does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the bioluminescence happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the newspapering does not occur and the haircare does not occur if the trailing occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: not the haircare but the newspapering occurs if the supererogation does not occur. sent2: the conventionalizing ship is prevented by that not the haircare but the newspapering happens. sent3: the posting occurs. sent4: if both the fossilizing and the scorch occurs the fact that the supererogation does not occur is true. sent5: the newspapering does not occur and the haircare does not occur if the conventionalizing ship occurs. sent6: the impersonalness happens. sent7: the newspapering does not occur. sent8: if the conventionalizing ship occurs then not the newspapering but the haircare occurs. sent9: the newspapering does not occur if the conventionalizing ship happens. sent10: the newspapering does not occur but the haircare happens. sent11: if the trailing happens then that the conventionalizing ship occurs is not incorrect. sent12: the newspapering does not occur and the haircare occurs if the trailing happens. sent13: the ultramicroscopicness does not occur and the clutching does not occur. sent14: the fossilizing happens. sent15: the newspapering does not occur if the trailing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trailing occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the conventionalizing ship happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the newspapering does not occur and the haircare does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__