the fact that either the constipation happens or the epidemicness happens or both is not correct.
sent1: that the urogenitalness happens is triggered by the anguineness. sent2: the constipation does not occur and the epidemic does not occur if the electrotherapy happens. sent3: the Bayesianness happens. sent4: that the axing bribe does not occur is not false. sent5: the constipation occurs if the ontologicalness happens. sent6: the field-cropness results in the stocktake. sent7: the fact that the pretending occurs and the obviation does not occur does not hold. sent8: the urogenitalness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Nauruan but not the ontologicalness occurs is not correct if the anguineness does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the Nauruan and the ontologicalness happens is false. sent11: the slacks does not occur. sent12: the counterglow does not occur. sent13: the leasing bull happens and/or the puffing happens. sent14: if that the anguineness does not occur is right that both the Nauruanness and the ontologicalness occurs is not true. sent15: the constipation occurs if the fact that the Nauruanness but not the ontologicalness happens does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the fact that not the digestibleness but the mimicry happens is correct does not hold the fact that the digestibleness occurs hold. sent17: if the digestibleness occurs the fact that the electrotherapy happens is correct. sent18: if both the non-anguineness and the non-urogenitalness occurs the elaborating bantam occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anguineness occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the urogenitalness happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the anguineness does not occur.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the Nauruanness and the non-ontologicalness happens does not hold.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the constipation happens.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the constipation happens or the epidemicness happens or both does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the constipation happens or the epidemicness happens or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the urogenitalness happens is triggered by the anguineness. sent2: the constipation does not occur and the epidemic does not occur if the electrotherapy happens. sent3: the Bayesianness happens. sent4: that the axing bribe does not occur is not false. sent5: the constipation occurs if the ontologicalness happens. sent6: the field-cropness results in the stocktake. sent7: the fact that the pretending occurs and the obviation does not occur does not hold. sent8: the urogenitalness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Nauruan but not the ontologicalness occurs is not correct if the anguineness does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the Nauruan and the ontologicalness happens is false. sent11: the slacks does not occur. sent12: the counterglow does not occur. sent13: the leasing bull happens and/or the puffing happens. sent14: if that the anguineness does not occur is right that both the Nauruanness and the ontologicalness occurs is not true. sent15: the constipation occurs if the fact that the Nauruanness but not the ontologicalness happens does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the fact that not the digestibleness but the mimicry happens is correct does not hold the fact that the digestibleness occurs hold. sent17: if the digestibleness occurs the fact that the electrotherapy happens is correct. sent18: if both the non-anguineness and the non-urogenitalness occurs the elaborating bantam occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anguineness occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the urogenitalness happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the anguineness does not occur.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the Nauruanness and the non-ontologicalness happens does not hold.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the constipation happens.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__