that the contadino does not service annuity and it is not uncharacteristic is not correct.
sent1: the contadino does service whipstitch if the Shetland is an abomination. sent2: if the clam does not service triplicity then either the Shetland is an abomination or it does service triplicity or both. sent3: the fact that something is a Rhinoptera but it is not a payer is not true if the fact that it is not an abomination hold. sent4: that something does not service annuity and it is not uncharacteristic is not right if it does service whipstitch. sent5: the contadino services whipstitch if the Shetland does service triplicity. sent6: the clam does not service triplicity if that it runs Agincourt and it is not a compulsive does not hold. sent7: that something does not service annuity but it is not characteristic does not hold if it does service whipstitch. sent8: the fact that the clam runs Agincourt but it is not a kind of a compulsive is not correct.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the clam does not service triplicity.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Shetland is an abomination or services triplicity or both.; int2 & sent1 & sent5 -> int3: the contadino does service whipstitch.; sent4 -> int4: the fact that the contadino does not service annuity and it is not uncharacteristic is incorrect if it does service whipstitch.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the incisor is a Rhinoptera but not a payer is wrong.
sent3 -> int5: that the incisor is a Rhinoptera that is not a kind of a payer is not true if that it is an abomination is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the contadino does not service annuity and it is not uncharacteristic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the contadino does service whipstitch if the Shetland is an abomination. sent2: if the clam does not service triplicity then either the Shetland is an abomination or it does service triplicity or both. sent3: the fact that something is a Rhinoptera but it is not a payer is not true if the fact that it is not an abomination hold. sent4: that something does not service annuity and it is not uncharacteristic is not right if it does service whipstitch. sent5: the contadino services whipstitch if the Shetland does service triplicity. sent6: the clam does not service triplicity if that it runs Agincourt and it is not a compulsive does not hold. sent7: that something does not service annuity but it is not characteristic does not hold if it does service whipstitch. sent8: the fact that the clam runs Agincourt but it is not a kind of a compulsive is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the clam does not service triplicity.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Shetland is an abomination or services triplicity or both.; int2 & sent1 & sent5 -> int3: the contadino does service whipstitch.; sent4 -> int4: the fact that the contadino does not service annuity and it is not uncharacteristic is incorrect if it does service whipstitch.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__