that the booger is not a hoopskirt but it is a kind of a bouillon is wrong.
sent1: that the glossy is not a bouillon but it is a hoopskirt is not true. sent2: the taurine reships. sent3: the fact that the booger is a hoopskirt and it is a bouillon is wrong. sent4: that the glossy is not a bouillon hold if there exists something such that that it is not a cereal is correct. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-unambitious thing that is not a minstrel does not hold then the glossy is not sculptural. sent6: there is something such that it is not non-cereal and it staggers chromosome. sent7: if the taurine bars booger it is epiphytic. sent8: something does bar booger if it reships. sent9: that the fact that the booger is both a hoopskirt and a bouillon hold is incorrect if the glossy is not a bouillon. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a cereal and staggers chromosome does not hold. sent11: the fact that the glossy is not a kind of a hoopskirt and is a bouillon does not hold. sent12: the fact that something is both not unambitious and not a minstrel is false if it is a nation. sent13: the fact that that the glossy is not a kind of a hoopskirt and is a bouillon is not false is false if the fact that the booger is not a bouillon is not false. sent14: if something is epiphytic it is a kind of a nation. sent15: the glossy is not a kind of a bouillon if there exists something such that that it is a cereal that staggers chromosome does not hold.
sent10 & sent15 -> int1: that the glossy is not a kind of a bouillon is correct.;
the booger is not a hoopskirt but it is a bouillon.
sent12 -> int2: that the taurine is a kind of non-unambitious thing that is not a minstrel is incorrect if it is a kind of a nation.; sent14 -> int3: if the taurine is epiphytic the fact that it is a nation hold.; sent8 -> int4: if the taurine reships it does bar booger.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the taurine does bar booger.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the taurine is epiphytic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the taurine is a nation.; int2 & int7 -> int8: that the taurine is ambitious and it is not a kind of a minstrel is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not unambitious and it is not a minstrel is not right.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the glossy is non-sculptural.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not sculptural.;
$hypothesis$ = that the booger is not a hoopskirt but it is a kind of a bouillon is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the glossy is not a bouillon but it is a hoopskirt is not true. sent2: the taurine reships. sent3: the fact that the booger is a hoopskirt and it is a bouillon is wrong. sent4: that the glossy is not a bouillon hold if there exists something such that that it is not a cereal is correct. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-unambitious thing that is not a minstrel does not hold then the glossy is not sculptural. sent6: there is something such that it is not non-cereal and it staggers chromosome. sent7: if the taurine bars booger it is epiphytic. sent8: something does bar booger if it reships. sent9: that the fact that the booger is both a hoopskirt and a bouillon hold is incorrect if the glossy is not a bouillon. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a cereal and staggers chromosome does not hold. sent11: the fact that the glossy is not a kind of a hoopskirt and is a bouillon does not hold. sent12: the fact that something is both not unambitious and not a minstrel is false if it is a nation. sent13: the fact that that the glossy is not a kind of a hoopskirt and is a bouillon is not false is false if the fact that the booger is not a bouillon is not false. sent14: if something is epiphytic it is a kind of a nation. sent15: the glossy is not a kind of a bouillon if there exists something such that that it is a cereal that staggers chromosome does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent15 -> int1: that the glossy is not a kind of a bouillon is correct.; __UNKNOWN__