the summation does not extort and does not feminize if that the charcuterie is not achenial is not false.
sent1: something does feminize if it is radiotelephonic. sent2: the charcuterie is achenial if there is something such that the fact that it does piece saucepan and it is labyrinthine is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something is not a folate but it girdles charcuterie is not wrong then it does not extort. sent4: the dry is not a HIV. sent5: the fact that the fact that the summation is a cornpone and it pieces sulfisoxazole does not hold hold. sent6: if the charcuterie is achenial the summation does not extort and it does not feminize. sent7: the fact that something pieces saucepan and is labyrinthine is not right if it is non-psychotherapeutic. sent8: the charcuterie is a HIV. sent9: if that the summation is not a folate and girdles charcuterie is not correct then it is not psychotherapeutic. sent10: the summation does feminize if it is radiotelephonic. sent11: the fact that something is not a real is right if it is a kind of a Serbian. sent12: something pieces saucepan and is labyrinthine. sent13: there exists something such that that it is cared-for and it is a burrow is not correct. sent14: there is something such that that it is a walk and it is an adapter is false. sent15: the haven is not a HIV. sent16: the summation does girdle charcuterie. sent17: if something is not dystopian and is a troy it is not a kind of an adapter. sent18: if that the summation is not a ipsedixitism but it pieces saucepan is not false then it is not a Domitian. sent19: if something is not non-radiotelephonic it does not feminize. sent20: the fact that the scorcher is a kind of non-confrontational thing that feminizes does not hold. sent21: the charcuterie is not non-achenial if there are non-labyrinthine things. sent22: the summation is not psychotherapeutic if it does not girdle charcuterie. sent23: if the fact that the summation is not a scoreboard and does piece saucepan does not hold then it is not painful. sent24: the summation is a HIV and/or it is radiotelephonic. sent25: if something is not achenial the fact that it is a kind of labyrinthine thing that is not psychotherapeutic is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the summation is not a folate and does girdle charcuterie is incorrect.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the summation is not psychotherapeutic is correct.; sent7 -> int2: the fact that the summation pieces saucepan and is not non-labyrinthine is false if it is not psychotherapeutic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the summation pieces saucepan and it is labyrinthine is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it pieces saucepan and it is labyrinthine is not true.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the charcuterie is achenial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the charcuterie is not achenial.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the summation is not a folate but it girdles charcuterie.; sent3 -> int8: the summation does not extort if it is not a kind of a folate and does girdle charcuterie.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the summation does not extort hold.; sent19 -> int10: that the summation does not feminize hold if it is radiotelephonic.;
the Karok is not a kind of a Serbian but it does scuff Cinclus.
sent25 -> int11: that if the summation is not achenial the fact that the summation is labyrinthine but it is not psychotherapeutic does not hold is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the summation does not extort and does not feminize if that the charcuterie is not achenial is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something does feminize if it is radiotelephonic. sent2: the charcuterie is achenial if there is something such that the fact that it does piece saucepan and it is labyrinthine is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something is not a folate but it girdles charcuterie is not wrong then it does not extort. sent4: the dry is not a HIV. sent5: the fact that the fact that the summation is a cornpone and it pieces sulfisoxazole does not hold hold. sent6: if the charcuterie is achenial the summation does not extort and it does not feminize. sent7: the fact that something pieces saucepan and is labyrinthine is not right if it is non-psychotherapeutic. sent8: the charcuterie is a HIV. sent9: if that the summation is not a folate and girdles charcuterie is not correct then it is not psychotherapeutic. sent10: the summation does feminize if it is radiotelephonic. sent11: the fact that something is not a real is right if it is a kind of a Serbian. sent12: something pieces saucepan and is labyrinthine. sent13: there exists something such that that it is cared-for and it is a burrow is not correct. sent14: there is something such that that it is a walk and it is an adapter is false. sent15: the haven is not a HIV. sent16: the summation does girdle charcuterie. sent17: if something is not dystopian and is a troy it is not a kind of an adapter. sent18: if that the summation is not a ipsedixitism but it pieces saucepan is not false then it is not a Domitian. sent19: if something is not non-radiotelephonic it does not feminize. sent20: the fact that the scorcher is a kind of non-confrontational thing that feminizes does not hold. sent21: the charcuterie is not non-achenial if there are non-labyrinthine things. sent22: the summation is not psychotherapeutic if it does not girdle charcuterie. sent23: if the fact that the summation is not a scoreboard and does piece saucepan does not hold then it is not painful. sent24: the summation is a HIV and/or it is radiotelephonic. sent25: if something is not achenial the fact that it is a kind of labyrinthine thing that is not psychotherapeutic is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the summation is not a folate and does girdle charcuterie is incorrect.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the summation is not psychotherapeutic is correct.; sent7 -> int2: the fact that the summation pieces saucepan and is not non-labyrinthine is false if it is not psychotherapeutic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the summation pieces saucepan and it is labyrinthine is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it pieces saucepan and it is labyrinthine is not true.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the charcuterie is achenial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the charcuterie is not achenial.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the summation is not a folate but it girdles charcuterie.; sent3 -> int8: the summation does not extort if it is not a kind of a folate and does girdle charcuterie.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the summation does not extort hold.; sent19 -> int10: that the summation does not feminize hold if it is radiotelephonic.; __UNKNOWN__