the traditionalist does not unpick Cassirer.
sent1: that the background is not unthinkable but it winnows coralwood is incorrect if the fact that it seeps is true. sent2: that the background is unthinkable but it does not winnow coralwood is incorrect. sent3: the mud is not a potboiler if something is not piratical. sent4: the fact that the background does seep is true if the mud is both not a potboiler and not a Christie. sent5: the background seeps if the mud is a potboiler but it is not a Christie. sent6: that the background is not unthinkable and it does not winnow coralwood is incorrect if it does seep. sent7: something is not piratical. sent8: that the background is thinkable but it does winnow coralwood is wrong. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it is not piratical is not wrong the mud is not a potboiler and is not a Christie. sent10: the traditionalist unpicks Cassirer if that the background is thinkable thing that does not winnow coralwood is not true.
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the mud is not a potboiler and not a Christie.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the background seeps hold.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the background is not unthinkable and does not winnow coralwood is false.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the traditionalist does not unpick Cassirer. ; $context$ = sent1: that the background is not unthinkable but it winnows coralwood is incorrect if the fact that it seeps is true. sent2: that the background is unthinkable but it does not winnow coralwood is incorrect. sent3: the mud is not a potboiler if something is not piratical. sent4: the fact that the background does seep is true if the mud is both not a potboiler and not a Christie. sent5: the background seeps if the mud is a potboiler but it is not a Christie. sent6: that the background is not unthinkable and it does not winnow coralwood is incorrect if it does seep. sent7: something is not piratical. sent8: that the background is thinkable but it does winnow coralwood is wrong. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it is not piratical is not wrong the mud is not a potboiler and is not a Christie. sent10: the traditionalist unpicks Cassirer if that the background is thinkable thing that does not winnow coralwood is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the mud is not a potboiler and not a Christie.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the background seeps hold.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the background is not unthinkable and does not winnow coralwood is false.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__