if the Vela does harry ballad the langur does lighten.
sent1: the langur lightens if there is something such that the fact that it is a closet is not false. sent2: the postmodernism does impart if the Vela harries ballad. sent3: that the fact that something encrusts Diana but it is not a kind of a closet hold is false if it is not visceral. sent4: something is a kind of a hawala if it does impart. sent5: the langur harries ballad. sent6: if the postmodernism is a hawala then that the electron is not amenorrheic and not a hawala is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the electron is not amenorrheic and is not a kind of a hawala does not hold the wrymouth is not visceral. sent8: that the electron is not amenorrheic but it is a hawala is false if the postmodernism is a hawala. sent9: the fact that something encrusts Diana and is a closet is false if it is not visceral. sent10: the langur lightens if that there exists something such that that it encrusts Diana and is not a closet does not hold hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Vela does harry ballad.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the postmodernism does impart.; sent4 -> int2: if the postmodernism does impart then it is a hawala.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the postmodernism is a hawala.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the electron is not amenorrheic and it is not a kind of a hawala is not correct.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the wrymouth is not visceral.; sent3 -> int6: the fact that the wrymouth does encrust Diana and is not a closet is not true if it is not visceral.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the wrymouth encrusts Diana but it is not a closet is not right.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it does encrust Diana and is not a closet is wrong.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the langur lightens.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the Vela does harry ballad the langur does lighten. ; $context$ = sent1: the langur lightens if there is something such that the fact that it is a closet is not false. sent2: the postmodernism does impart if the Vela harries ballad. sent3: that the fact that something encrusts Diana but it is not a kind of a closet hold is false if it is not visceral. sent4: something is a kind of a hawala if it does impart. sent5: the langur harries ballad. sent6: if the postmodernism is a hawala then that the electron is not amenorrheic and not a hawala is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the electron is not amenorrheic and is not a kind of a hawala does not hold the wrymouth is not visceral. sent8: that the electron is not amenorrheic but it is a hawala is false if the postmodernism is a hawala. sent9: the fact that something encrusts Diana and is a closet is false if it is not visceral. sent10: the langur lightens if that there exists something such that that it encrusts Diana and is not a closet does not hold hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Vela does harry ballad.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the postmodernism does impart.; sent4 -> int2: if the postmodernism does impart then it is a hawala.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the postmodernism is a hawala.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the electron is not amenorrheic and it is not a kind of a hawala is not correct.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the wrymouth is not visceral.; sent3 -> int6: the fact that the wrymouth does encrust Diana and is not a closet is not true if it is not visceral.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the wrymouth encrusts Diana but it is not a closet is not right.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it does encrust Diana and is not a closet is wrong.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the langur lightens.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__