the onomancer is not a kind of a parthenote.
sent1: that the onomancer does not qualify and is a female does not hold. sent2: the provirus is not a hamate and not a parthenote. sent3: if the hairpiece is Rosicrucian the uropygium is a Rosicrucian. sent4: if that the uropygium is not non-closed and/or it does not excise peripatetic is not true then the fact that it is non-Rosicrucian is true. sent5: that the onomancer does qualify and is not a female is false. sent6: if the uropygium does not excise carriage then the fact that the onomancer does not qualify and it is not a female is not correct. sent7: the hairpiece does derail on-license and qualifies. sent8: if the fact that the uropygium is female or it does not excise carriage or both is wrong the profiteer does not excise carriage. sent9: if the uropygium does not excise carriage the fact that the onomancer qualifies and is not female is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the onomancer does not stigmatize facing and/or it is not leprous does not hold. sent11: if something does perplex loading it perplexes profiteer. sent12: if that something does not qualify and is not female is not true it is a parthenote. sent13: the hairpiece is a kind of a parthenote if the provirus is not a hamate and it is not a parthenote. sent14: if that the uropygium is not closed and/or it does not excise peripatetic is incorrect then it is not a Rosicrucian. sent15: if the uropygium is not closed or it does not excise peripatetic or both then it does not excise carriage. sent16: the onomancer is a hamate and/or it is a parthenote. sent17: the uropygium does not close and/or it excises peripatetic. sent18: either the uropygium closes or it does not excise peripatetic or both. sent19: the fact that the hairpiece is not a parthenote and it is not a hamate is incorrect if the onomancer is not a female. sent20: something is Rosicrucian if it is a kind of a female. sent21: the hairpiece is a kind of a hamate and/or it is a Rosicrucian. sent22: if that the uropygium is not closed and/or it does excise peripatetic is not right it is not a Rosicrucian. sent23: if that something does not excise carriage hold then it is not an applause or it is not a kind of a versicle or both. sent24: the uropygium is a Rosicrucian if that the hairpiece is a hamate is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the uropygium is not closed and/or it does not excise peripatetic is not right.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the uropygium is not a Rosicrucian.; sent21 & sent24 & sent3 -> int2: the uropygium is Rosicrucian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the uropygium is not closed and/or it does not excise peripatetic.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the uropygium does not excise carriage.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the onomancer does not qualify and is not female is not right.; sent12 -> int7: the onomancer is a parthenote if that it does not qualify and it is not a kind of a female is false.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the onomancer is not a parthenote.
sent20 -> int8: the onomancer is Rosicrucian if it is a kind of a female.;
$hypothesis$ = the onomancer is not a kind of a parthenote. ; $context$ = sent1: that the onomancer does not qualify and is a female does not hold. sent2: the provirus is not a hamate and not a parthenote. sent3: if the hairpiece is Rosicrucian the uropygium is a Rosicrucian. sent4: if that the uropygium is not non-closed and/or it does not excise peripatetic is not true then the fact that it is non-Rosicrucian is true. sent5: that the onomancer does qualify and is not a female is false. sent6: if the uropygium does not excise carriage then the fact that the onomancer does not qualify and it is not a female is not correct. sent7: the hairpiece does derail on-license and qualifies. sent8: if the fact that the uropygium is female or it does not excise carriage or both is wrong the profiteer does not excise carriage. sent9: if the uropygium does not excise carriage the fact that the onomancer qualifies and is not female is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the onomancer does not stigmatize facing and/or it is not leprous does not hold. sent11: if something does perplex loading it perplexes profiteer. sent12: if that something does not qualify and is not female is not true it is a parthenote. sent13: the hairpiece is a kind of a parthenote if the provirus is not a hamate and it is not a parthenote. sent14: if that the uropygium is not closed and/or it does not excise peripatetic is incorrect then it is not a Rosicrucian. sent15: if the uropygium is not closed or it does not excise peripatetic or both then it does not excise carriage. sent16: the onomancer is a hamate and/or it is a parthenote. sent17: the uropygium does not close and/or it excises peripatetic. sent18: either the uropygium closes or it does not excise peripatetic or both. sent19: the fact that the hairpiece is not a parthenote and it is not a hamate is incorrect if the onomancer is not a female. sent20: something is Rosicrucian if it is a kind of a female. sent21: the hairpiece is a kind of a hamate and/or it is a Rosicrucian. sent22: if that the uropygium is not closed and/or it does excise peripatetic is not right it is not a Rosicrucian. sent23: if that something does not excise carriage hold then it is not an applause or it is not a kind of a versicle or both. sent24: the uropygium is a Rosicrucian if that the hairpiece is a hamate is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the uropygium is not closed and/or it does not excise peripatetic is not right.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the uropygium is not a Rosicrucian.; sent21 & sent24 & sent3 -> int2: the uropygium is Rosicrucian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the uropygium is not closed and/or it does not excise peripatetic.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the uropygium does not excise carriage.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the onomancer does not qualify and is not female is not right.; sent12 -> int7: the onomancer is a parthenote if that it does not qualify and it is not a kind of a female is false.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__