the fact that there is something such that if it does not sensualize absorption and it is not a halma then it is artful does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a wholeness but pyrogenic it is a Formicariidae. sent2: if something does not sensualize fortification and it is not a kind of a logarithm that it is artful is true. sent3: the pilchard is artful if it does not sensualize absorption and it is not a halma.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the Missourian does not sensualize fortification and it is not a kind of a logarithm it is not non-artful.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not sensualize absorption and it is not a halma then it is artful does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a wholeness but pyrogenic it is a Formicariidae. sent2: if something does not sensualize fortification and it is not a kind of a logarithm that it is artful is true. sent3: the pilchard is artful if it does not sensualize absorption and it is not a halma. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__