the fact that the fundamentalist happens is right.
sent1: if the blackjack does not occur the counterplot does not occur. sent2: the culinariness does not occur. sent3: the counterplot does not occur if the spraying Scheldt does not occur. sent4: the supination happens if the advisableness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the counterplot does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the non-culinariness and the fundamentalistness occurs hold. sent6: that either the petroglyph does not occur or the jugglery does not occur or both is not correct if the thundershower occurs. sent7: if the supination occurs then the spraying Scheldt does not occur and/or the blackjack does not occur. sent8: that the thundershower does not occur prevents the inadvisableness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thundershower happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the petroglyph does not occur or the jugglery does not occur or both is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fundamentalist happens is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blackjack does not occur the counterplot does not occur. sent2: the culinariness does not occur. sent3: the counterplot does not occur if the spraying Scheldt does not occur. sent4: the supination happens if the advisableness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the counterplot does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the non-culinariness and the fundamentalistness occurs hold. sent6: that either the petroglyph does not occur or the jugglery does not occur or both is not correct if the thundershower occurs. sent7: if the supination occurs then the spraying Scheldt does not occur and/or the blackjack does not occur. sent8: that the thundershower does not occur prevents the inadvisableness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thundershower happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the petroglyph does not occur or the jugglery does not occur or both is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__