the fact that there exists something such that if it does not philander Limnobium then the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a damp and is a ripper is true is false does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the viscose is not a ripper but it is inland is wrong if it is not a orchidectomy. sent2: that the saucepot is not helpful but it does engender is not right if it is not a seller. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not pressor then it is both not a thrown and ammonitic. sent4: if the viscose does not philander Limnobium the fact that it is a damp and it is a ripper is not right. sent5: the fact that something is not a ruin but it is a kind of a Agee is wrong if it does not treble. sent6: if the viscose does not philander Limnobium the fact that it is both not a damp and a ripper is wrong. sent7: there is something such that if it does not philander Limnobium then it is both not a damp and a ripper. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a shortness then the fact that it does cicatrize and it mulcts plasm is not correct. sent9: if the scrubland is not a ripper the fact that it is not propitious and it is anaphrodisiac is not true. sent10: the fact that the viscose does damp and it does philander venom is not right if it is not an orator. sent11: there is something such that if it philanders Limnobium that it does not damp and it is a ripper is not true. sent12: that something is not a Caliphate but it catapults trichlormethiazide is incorrect if that it is not exocentric is not wrong. sent13: the fact that the viscose is not a damp but it is a ripper does not hold if it does philander Limnobium. sent14: if the Velcro is not dural then the fact that it is not a kind of a orchidectomy and it is a closer is not true. sent15: if the stairhead does not philander duck then that it does not philander Limnobium and it is a kind of a shipyard is not right. sent16: that the provocateur is a kind of a alienor and it does belabor juvenile is not right if it is not a damp. sent17: that something is a kind of non-infectious thing that catapults independence does not hold if it does not belabor juvenile. sent18: there is something such that if it does not philander Limnobium then the fact that it is a damp and is a kind of a ripper does not hold. sent19: the viscose is not a damp but a ripper if the fact that it does not philander Limnobium is correct. sent20: the fact that the viscose is not a chanar and is a damp does not hold if it does not belabor scandalmonger.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not treble the fact that that it is not a ruin but a Agee hold is incorrect.
sent5 -> int1: that the fact that the eyelet is not a ruin but it is a Agee does not hold is true if it does not treble.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not philander Limnobium then the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a damp and is a ripper is true is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the viscose is not a ripper but it is inland is wrong if it is not a orchidectomy. sent2: that the saucepot is not helpful but it does engender is not right if it is not a seller. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not pressor then it is both not a thrown and ammonitic. sent4: if the viscose does not philander Limnobium the fact that it is a damp and it is a ripper is not right. sent5: the fact that something is not a ruin but it is a kind of a Agee is wrong if it does not treble. sent6: if the viscose does not philander Limnobium the fact that it is both not a damp and a ripper is wrong. sent7: there is something such that if it does not philander Limnobium then it is both not a damp and a ripper. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a shortness then the fact that it does cicatrize and it mulcts plasm is not correct. sent9: if the scrubland is not a ripper the fact that it is not propitious and it is anaphrodisiac is not true. sent10: the fact that the viscose does damp and it does philander venom is not right if it is not an orator. sent11: there is something such that if it philanders Limnobium that it does not damp and it is a ripper is not true. sent12: that something is not a Caliphate but it catapults trichlormethiazide is incorrect if that it is not exocentric is not wrong. sent13: the fact that the viscose is not a damp but it is a ripper does not hold if it does philander Limnobium. sent14: if the Velcro is not dural then the fact that it is not a kind of a orchidectomy and it is a closer is not true. sent15: if the stairhead does not philander duck then that it does not philander Limnobium and it is a kind of a shipyard is not right. sent16: that the provocateur is a kind of a alienor and it does belabor juvenile is not right if it is not a damp. sent17: that something is a kind of non-infectious thing that catapults independence does not hold if it does not belabor juvenile. sent18: there is something such that if it does not philander Limnobium then the fact that it is a damp and is a kind of a ripper does not hold. sent19: the viscose is not a damp but a ripper if the fact that it does not philander Limnobium is correct. sent20: the fact that the viscose is not a chanar and is a damp does not hold if it does not belabor scandalmonger. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__