the excelling lock does not occur.
sent1: if the excelling lock does not occur the lowercase happens but the Ravel does not occur. sent2: the profanation does not occur and the cohering Guinevere does not occur if the bridling does not occur. sent3: both the triumphalness and the propaedeutic occurs if the cohering Guinevere does not occur. sent4: the fact that the sigmoidectomy does not occur and the nutritionalness happens is not correct if the propaedeutic occurs. sent5: that the excelling lock does not occur and the reversion does not occur is triggered by that the whammy does not occur. sent6: the fact that the reversion does not occur and the whammy occurs is wrong if the fact that the Ravel does not occur is right. sent7: that the transactinide does not occur brings about that the paleocorticalness does not occur and the whammy does not occur. sent8: if the laxative happens then the romping does not occur and the bridling does not occur. sent9: the fact that the excelling assailability and/or the hefting adenoma occurs is wrong if the nutritionalness does not occur. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the hefting Heinz does not occur and the hefting morosoph happens does not hold the laxativeness occurs hold. sent11: the paleocorticalness does not occur if that the reversion does not occur but the whammy happens does not hold. sent12: if that the sigmoidectomy does not occur but the nutritionalness occurs does not hold the nutritionalness does not occur. sent13: not the hefting adenoma but the excelling assailability happens. sent14: that the paleocorticalness happens and the transactinideness occurs is not wrong if that the hefting adenoma does not occur is true. sent15: if the fact that the excelling assailability or the hefting adenoma or both occurs is not correct the fact that the transactinideness does not occur hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the excelling lock occurs is not right.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the lowercase but not the Ravel occurs.; int1 -> int2: the Ravel does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the reversion does not occur and the whammy occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the paleocorticalness does not occur.; sent13 -> int5: the hefting adenoma does not occur.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: both the paleocorticalness and the transactinideness happens.; int6 -> int7: the paleocorticalness occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the excelling lock does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the excelling lock does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the excelling lock does not occur the lowercase happens but the Ravel does not occur. sent2: the profanation does not occur and the cohering Guinevere does not occur if the bridling does not occur. sent3: both the triumphalness and the propaedeutic occurs if the cohering Guinevere does not occur. sent4: the fact that the sigmoidectomy does not occur and the nutritionalness happens is not correct if the propaedeutic occurs. sent5: that the excelling lock does not occur and the reversion does not occur is triggered by that the whammy does not occur. sent6: the fact that the reversion does not occur and the whammy occurs is wrong if the fact that the Ravel does not occur is right. sent7: that the transactinide does not occur brings about that the paleocorticalness does not occur and the whammy does not occur. sent8: if the laxative happens then the romping does not occur and the bridling does not occur. sent9: the fact that the excelling assailability and/or the hefting adenoma occurs is wrong if the nutritionalness does not occur. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the hefting Heinz does not occur and the hefting morosoph happens does not hold the laxativeness occurs hold. sent11: the paleocorticalness does not occur if that the reversion does not occur but the whammy happens does not hold. sent12: if that the sigmoidectomy does not occur but the nutritionalness occurs does not hold the nutritionalness does not occur. sent13: not the hefting adenoma but the excelling assailability happens. sent14: that the paleocorticalness happens and the transactinideness occurs is not wrong if that the hefting adenoma does not occur is true. sent15: if the fact that the excelling assailability or the hefting adenoma or both occurs is not correct the fact that the transactinideness does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the excelling lock occurs is not right.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the lowercase but not the Ravel occurs.; int1 -> int2: the Ravel does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the reversion does not occur and the whammy occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the paleocorticalness does not occur.; sent13 -> int5: the hefting adenoma does not occur.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: both the paleocorticalness and the transactinideness happens.; int6 -> int7: the paleocorticalness occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__