the Gaboneseness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the unattributableness does not occur hold. sent2: the blubber happens. sent3: the Gabonese does not occur if the pragmaticsness and the affiliation happens. sent4: the pragmatics occurs if both the emirate and the defense happens. sent5: that the surrounding does not occur is not wrong if the unstuckness and the unableness occurs. sent6: the affiliation occurs. sent7: if the unattributableness does not occur the reprising college happens. sent8: the trundling does not occur if either the reprising college occurs or the unholiness happens or both. sent9: that the trundling does not occur and the unholiness does not occur does not hold if the defense does not occur. sent10: the defense does not occur. sent11: that the emirate but not the defense happens prevents that the pragmatics does not occur. sent12: if the trundling does not occur the defense does not occur. sent13: if the trundling does not occur the emirate occurs and the defense does not occur. sent14: that both the non-pragmaticsness and the emirate occurs prevents the defense.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the reprising college happens.; int1 -> int2: the reprising college occurs or the unholiness occurs or both.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the trundle does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the emirate occurs but the defense does not occur.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the pragmaticsness occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: both the pragmaticsness and the affiliation happens.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Gaboneseness occurs is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the Gaboneseness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the unattributableness does not occur hold. sent2: the blubber happens. sent3: the Gabonese does not occur if the pragmaticsness and the affiliation happens. sent4: the pragmatics occurs if both the emirate and the defense happens. sent5: that the surrounding does not occur is not wrong if the unstuckness and the unableness occurs. sent6: the affiliation occurs. sent7: if the unattributableness does not occur the reprising college happens. sent8: the trundling does not occur if either the reprising college occurs or the unholiness happens or both. sent9: that the trundling does not occur and the unholiness does not occur does not hold if the defense does not occur. sent10: the defense does not occur. sent11: that the emirate but not the defense happens prevents that the pragmatics does not occur. sent12: if the trundling does not occur the defense does not occur. sent13: if the trundling does not occur the emirate occurs and the defense does not occur. sent14: that both the non-pragmaticsness and the emirate occurs prevents the defense. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the reprising college happens.; int1 -> int2: the reprising college occurs or the unholiness occurs or both.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the trundle does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the emirate occurs but the defense does not occur.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the pragmaticsness occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: both the pragmaticsness and the affiliation happens.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__