the nondriver is not plagioclastic and it does not permit signal-to-noise if the ligament is not prosthetic.
sent1: if that the ligament is not prosthetic is not incorrect then the fact that the Alar is a pratfall that permits toby is wrong. sent2: the ligament is not a pratfall. sent3: that the nondriver permits signal-to-noise and is not prosthetic is not incorrect. sent4: the nondriver is a Dalmatian if that the Alar is not a pratfall and does permit toby does not hold. sent5: if the Alar is a pratfall that the nondriver is Dalmatian hold. sent6: the cellulose is prosthetic. sent7: that the Alar is a pratfall that permits toby is not correct. sent8: the fact that the Alar is a Dalmatian and permits toby is wrong. sent9: something is prosthetic and not plagioclastic if it permits toby. sent10: that the Alar is not a pratfall but it permits toby is not correct if the ligament is not prosthetic. sent11: the velvetleaf is not a pratfall. sent12: if the fact that the fact that something is a pratfall and prosthetic is not false is not correct then it is not a pratfall. sent13: if the fact that the Alar does not permit toby but it is a kind of a Dalmatian is incorrect then the nondriver does permit signal-to-noise. sent14: the nondriver is plagioclastic and is not a kind of a pratfall. sent15: if the nondriver is not a Dalmatian then that the Alar is a pratfall and it is plagioclastic is not correct. sent16: the ligament is not solanaceous if it permits throw. sent17: if the Alar does permit toby it does not permit signal-to-noise. sent18: the fact that the ligament is not prosthetic but it is not non-plagioclastic is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ligament is not prosthetic.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Alar is not a pratfall and does permit toby is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the nondriver is a kind of a Dalmatian.;
the Kwakiutl is not a pratfall.
sent12 -> int3: if that the ligament is a pratfall and prosthetic is not true then it is not a pratfall.;
$hypothesis$ = the nondriver is not plagioclastic and it does not permit signal-to-noise if the ligament is not prosthetic. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the ligament is not prosthetic is not incorrect then the fact that the Alar is a pratfall that permits toby is wrong. sent2: the ligament is not a pratfall. sent3: that the nondriver permits signal-to-noise and is not prosthetic is not incorrect. sent4: the nondriver is a Dalmatian if that the Alar is not a pratfall and does permit toby does not hold. sent5: if the Alar is a pratfall that the nondriver is Dalmatian hold. sent6: the cellulose is prosthetic. sent7: that the Alar is a pratfall that permits toby is not correct. sent8: the fact that the Alar is a Dalmatian and permits toby is wrong. sent9: something is prosthetic and not plagioclastic if it permits toby. sent10: that the Alar is not a pratfall but it permits toby is not correct if the ligament is not prosthetic. sent11: the velvetleaf is not a pratfall. sent12: if the fact that the fact that something is a pratfall and prosthetic is not false is not correct then it is not a pratfall. sent13: if the fact that the Alar does not permit toby but it is a kind of a Dalmatian is incorrect then the nondriver does permit signal-to-noise. sent14: the nondriver is plagioclastic and is not a kind of a pratfall. sent15: if the nondriver is not a Dalmatian then that the Alar is a pratfall and it is plagioclastic is not correct. sent16: the ligament is not solanaceous if it permits throw. sent17: if the Alar does permit toby it does not permit signal-to-noise. sent18: the fact that the ligament is not prosthetic but it is not non-plagioclastic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ligament is not prosthetic.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Alar is not a pratfall and does permit toby is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the nondriver is a kind of a Dalmatian.; __UNKNOWN__