the girandole is an apparition.
sent1: the girandole is a kind of a topicality. sent2: the European is protozoal or is rocky or both. sent3: something is not a kind of an apparition if it does not impede Hinduism. sent4: the European is not parenteral. sent5: if the fact that the European is protozoal is right it does veer. sent6: if the fact that the European veers hold it commiserates. sent7: if the girandole is not nonfat and/or it is not protozoal then the fact that it is not protozoal is true. sent8: the girandole is not nonfat and/or it is protozoal. sent9: the European is not an apparition if the fact that the fowler is both nonfat and not an apparition is wrong. sent10: if the girandole does commiserate and is a Baisakh then it does not veer. sent11: the girandole is not an undertow. sent12: the girandole is not accurate if the European is not parenteral. sent13: the hexestrol is a kind of a topicality. sent14: the girandole is not nonfat and/or it is not non-protozoal if it is not accurate. sent15: the fowler is not accurate. sent16: the girandole is a kind of a Aerobacter. sent17: there exists something such that it impedes Hinduism. sent18: that the girandole is not a topicality and is a Baisakh does not hold if the European does veer. sent19: if something does not commiserate and is not protozoal then it is rocky. sent20: if the fowler is inaccurate then that it is nonfat and it is not a kind of an apparition does not hold. sent21: the girandole is not parenteral if the European is not rocky. sent22: if the girandole is not accurate then it is not nonfat or it is not protozoal or both. sent23: if something is rocky then that it is a kind of an apparition is right. sent24: the fact that the girandole is a topicality is not false if something does impede Hinduism. sent25: if there exists something such that it does impede Hinduism then the girandole is a topicality and it is a Baisakh. sent26: if something that is not rocky is protozoal then it veers. sent27: something does not commiserate and/or is not a refreshment if it impedes Hinduism.
sent17 & sent25 -> int1: that the girandole is a topicality and it is a Baisakh is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the girandole is a Baisakh is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the girandole commiserates.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the girandole does commiserate and it is a Baisakh.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the girandole does not veer.; sent12 & sent4 -> int5: the girandole is not accurate.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the girandole is not nonfat and/or it is not protozoal.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the girandole is non-protozoal.; sent19 -> int8: the girandole is rocky if it does not commiserate and is not protozoal.; sent23 -> int9: the girandole is an apparition if it is rocky.;
the girandole is not a kind of an apparition.
sent3 -> int10: the girandole is not an apparition if it does not impede Hinduism.;
$hypothesis$ = the girandole is an apparition. ; $context$ = sent1: the girandole is a kind of a topicality. sent2: the European is protozoal or is rocky or both. sent3: something is not a kind of an apparition if it does not impede Hinduism. sent4: the European is not parenteral. sent5: if the fact that the European is protozoal is right it does veer. sent6: if the fact that the European veers hold it commiserates. sent7: if the girandole is not nonfat and/or it is not protozoal then the fact that it is not protozoal is true. sent8: the girandole is not nonfat and/or it is protozoal. sent9: the European is not an apparition if the fact that the fowler is both nonfat and not an apparition is wrong. sent10: if the girandole does commiserate and is a Baisakh then it does not veer. sent11: the girandole is not an undertow. sent12: the girandole is not accurate if the European is not parenteral. sent13: the hexestrol is a kind of a topicality. sent14: the girandole is not nonfat and/or it is not non-protozoal if it is not accurate. sent15: the fowler is not accurate. sent16: the girandole is a kind of a Aerobacter. sent17: there exists something such that it impedes Hinduism. sent18: that the girandole is not a topicality and is a Baisakh does not hold if the European does veer. sent19: if something does not commiserate and is not protozoal then it is rocky. sent20: if the fowler is inaccurate then that it is nonfat and it is not a kind of an apparition does not hold. sent21: the girandole is not parenteral if the European is not rocky. sent22: if the girandole is not accurate then it is not nonfat or it is not protozoal or both. sent23: if something is rocky then that it is a kind of an apparition is right. sent24: the fact that the girandole is a topicality is not false if something does impede Hinduism. sent25: if there exists something such that it does impede Hinduism then the girandole is a topicality and it is a Baisakh. sent26: if something that is not rocky is protozoal then it veers. sent27: something does not commiserate and/or is not a refreshment if it impedes Hinduism. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent25 -> int1: that the girandole is a topicality and it is a Baisakh is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the girandole is a Baisakh is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the girandole commiserates.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the girandole does commiserate and it is a Baisakh.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the girandole does not veer.; sent12 & sent4 -> int5: the girandole is not accurate.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the girandole is not nonfat and/or it is not protozoal.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the girandole is non-protozoal.; sent19 -> int8: the girandole is rocky if it does not commiserate and is not protozoal.; sent23 -> int9: the girandole is an apparition if it is rocky.; __UNKNOWN__