that the withstander is phalangeal but it is not a Barth is not correct.
sent1: the withstander does shock. sent2: The Pomacentrus impairs withstander. sent3: the withstander impairs Pomacentrus. sent4: if something that is a shock is a kind of a Barth then it does not impair Pomacentrus. sent5: the withstander is phalangeal. sent6: that the asclepiad is not phalangeal is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the withstander is a Barth.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the withstander does shock and it is a kind of a Barth is not false.; sent4 -> int2: if the withstander is a shock that is a Barth it does not impair Pomacentrus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the withstander does not impair Pomacentrus is right.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the withstander is not a kind of a Barth.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the withstander is phalangeal but it is not a Barth is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the withstander does shock. sent2: The Pomacentrus impairs withstander. sent3: the withstander impairs Pomacentrus. sent4: if something that is a shock is a kind of a Barth then it does not impair Pomacentrus. sent5: the withstander is phalangeal. sent6: that the asclepiad is not phalangeal is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the withstander is a Barth.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the withstander does shock and it is a kind of a Barth is not false.; sent4 -> int2: if the withstander is a shock that is a Barth it does not impair Pomacentrus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the withstander does not impair Pomacentrus is right.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the withstander is not a kind of a Barth.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__