there is something such that if that it is not a claret and is appositional does not hold the fact that it is not a blende is true.
sent1: if that the Californian does accelerate kroon and is a claret is incorrect the fact that it does not troll retail is true. sent2: the mercury does not wave whisper if the fact that it is not a blende and it is endermic is wrong. sent3: if that the mercury is not a kind of a claret and is appositional is incorrect it is not a blende. sent4: the mercury is not a blende if it is not appositional. sent5: if that something is non-interoceptive and a blende is not right it is not a guarantee. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a claret and it is appositional is false then it is a blende. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a cutlassfish then it is nonmetallic. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a claret and is appositional it is not a blende. sent9: if the fact that the mercury is a kind of non-appositional thing that accelerates laurel-tree is wrong that it is a cutlassfish is correct. sent10: the desktop is not a kind of a claret if that it does not accelerate concussion and it is a Cassiopeia is not true. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a salute is correct it is not interoceptive. sent12: the mercury is not a blende if the fact that it is both not an eruption and Gallic is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a Piston and it is electromotive does not hold it is not a lancer. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not immiscible and is conservative is incorrect it is not a Bogart. sent15: something is not a kind of a design if that it is a kind of non-tuneless thing that is a Piston is not correct. sent16: there is something such that if that it does not phrase and is sensorimotor does not hold it is not a counterfeit.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the electrolyte is not a guarantee is not incorrect if that it is not interoceptive and it is a kind of a blende does not hold.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not a claret and is appositional does not hold the fact that it is not a blende is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Californian does accelerate kroon and is a claret is incorrect the fact that it does not troll retail is true. sent2: the mercury does not wave whisper if the fact that it is not a blende and it is endermic is wrong. sent3: if that the mercury is not a kind of a claret and is appositional is incorrect it is not a blende. sent4: the mercury is not a blende if it is not appositional. sent5: if that something is non-interoceptive and a blende is not right it is not a guarantee. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a claret and it is appositional is false then it is a blende. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a cutlassfish then it is nonmetallic. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a claret and is appositional it is not a blende. sent9: if the fact that the mercury is a kind of non-appositional thing that accelerates laurel-tree is wrong that it is a cutlassfish is correct. sent10: the desktop is not a kind of a claret if that it does not accelerate concussion and it is a Cassiopeia is not true. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a salute is correct it is not interoceptive. sent12: the mercury is not a blende if the fact that it is both not an eruption and Gallic is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a Piston and it is electromotive does not hold it is not a lancer. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not immiscible and is conservative is incorrect it is not a Bogart. sent15: something is not a kind of a design if that it is a kind of non-tuneless thing that is a Piston is not correct. sent16: there is something such that if that it does not phrase and is sensorimotor does not hold it is not a counterfeit. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__