that the Jacobin is not unmown is not correct.
sent1: the foreland is a kind of a plan. sent2: if the fact that something is mown but not a plan is not correct then it is mown. sent3: everything is topless. sent4: the foreland is a kind of a Syngonium if it does plan. sent5: the Jacobin is not a contemplation if there is something such that the fact that it is both a contemplation and not a Andrenidae is wrong. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is a contemplation but not a Andrenidae is incorrect. sent7: the space is a Syngonium. sent8: something is not a safe if that it is a kind of a Ilmen and it is not a contemplation is not correct. sent9: the Jacobin is a Andrenidae and is a kind of a cybercrime. sent10: the tapioca is a Syngonium. sent11: something is not unmown if the fact that it is not unmown and it is a plan is not correct. sent12: the bestiary is a Syngonium if it is not a safe. sent13: if the Jacobin does plan then the foreland is unmown. sent14: that the Jacobin is a Syngonium hold. sent15: that that the bestiary is a Ilmen but it is not a contemplation is not correct is true if the foreland is topless. sent16: the foreland is a kind of a Tamil. sent17: the fact that the DAT is a Syngonium is right. sent18: if the fact that something is topless is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a plan and is not a Ilmen is not right.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the foreland is a Syngonium.;
the Jacobin is not unmown.
sent11 -> int2: if that the Jacobin is unmown and it plans is wrong then it is not unmown.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Jacobin is not unmown is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the foreland is a kind of a plan. sent2: if the fact that something is mown but not a plan is not correct then it is mown. sent3: everything is topless. sent4: the foreland is a kind of a Syngonium if it does plan. sent5: the Jacobin is not a contemplation if there is something such that the fact that it is both a contemplation and not a Andrenidae is wrong. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is a contemplation but not a Andrenidae is incorrect. sent7: the space is a Syngonium. sent8: something is not a safe if that it is a kind of a Ilmen and it is not a contemplation is not correct. sent9: the Jacobin is a Andrenidae and is a kind of a cybercrime. sent10: the tapioca is a Syngonium. sent11: something is not unmown if the fact that it is not unmown and it is a plan is not correct. sent12: the bestiary is a Syngonium if it is not a safe. sent13: if the Jacobin does plan then the foreland is unmown. sent14: that the Jacobin is a Syngonium hold. sent15: that that the bestiary is a Ilmen but it is not a contemplation is not correct is true if the foreland is topless. sent16: the foreland is a kind of a Tamil. sent17: the fact that the DAT is a Syngonium is right. sent18: if the fact that something is topless is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a plan and is not a Ilmen is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the foreland is a Syngonium.; __UNKNOWN__