that there exists something such that if it does not debut emptying the fact that it does not change and it does not tunnel hallux does not hold is not true.
sent1: if the rule is not a Archosargus the fact that it does not debut filter and does not debut emptying is not true. sent2: if the roost is not a kind of a tailpipe then that it does not debut emptying and is not a platitude does not hold. sent3: if something is not a kind of a homosexual then the fact that it does not piddle and it does not debut tricyclic does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not debut emptying it is not a kind of a changing and does not tunnel hallux. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not furlough Swift then the fact that it does not furlough Accipiter and does not preach is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a dishonor then the fact that it is both not decorous and non-exothermic does not hold. sent7: if the roost does not debut emptying that it is not a changing and tunnels hallux is false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not uncharacteristic that it is not a kind of a anecdotist and it is not a vernacular is not true. sent9: there is something such that if it does debut emptying the fact that it is not a changing and it does not tunnel hallux is false. sent10: there is something such that if it does not debut emptying the fact that it is not a kind of a changing and it tunnels hallux is not true. sent11: that the postulant is both not immunodeficient and not a yellowfin is not correct if it does not debut emptying. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a tabletop then the fact that it is non-exothermic thing that is not logistics does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it is not an ideology that it is not exothermic and is not a bombsight is false. sent14: there is something such that if it does not debut emptying then that it is a changing that does not tunnel hallux does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a lateness that it does not debut languor and it is not a kind of a Peary is not right. sent16: if the roost does not debut emptying then the fact that it changes and it does not tunnel hallux is false. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not an ideology that it does not furlough sordidness and is not a peanut is not right. sent18: if something is not a borate the fact that it does not work and is not a Psalter does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the roost does debut emptying is correct then that it does not change and it does not tunnel hallux is false. sent20: if the roost does not debut emptying then it is not a changing and it does not tunnel hallux. sent21: the fact that the roost does not change and it does not tunnel hallux is not true if it does not debut emptying.
sent21 -> hypothesis;
if the tricyclic is not a borate the fact that it is not a work and it is not a Psalter is not true.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not debut emptying the fact that it does not change and it does not tunnel hallux does not hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rule is not a Archosargus the fact that it does not debut filter and does not debut emptying is not true. sent2: if the roost is not a kind of a tailpipe then that it does not debut emptying and is not a platitude does not hold. sent3: if something is not a kind of a homosexual then the fact that it does not piddle and it does not debut tricyclic does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not debut emptying it is not a kind of a changing and does not tunnel hallux. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not furlough Swift then the fact that it does not furlough Accipiter and does not preach is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a dishonor then the fact that it is both not decorous and non-exothermic does not hold. sent7: if the roost does not debut emptying that it is not a changing and tunnels hallux is false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not uncharacteristic that it is not a kind of a anecdotist and it is not a vernacular is not true. sent9: there is something such that if it does debut emptying the fact that it is not a changing and it does not tunnel hallux is false. sent10: there is something such that if it does not debut emptying the fact that it is not a kind of a changing and it tunnels hallux is not true. sent11: that the postulant is both not immunodeficient and not a yellowfin is not correct if it does not debut emptying. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a tabletop then the fact that it is non-exothermic thing that is not logistics does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it is not an ideology that it is not exothermic and is not a bombsight is false. sent14: there is something such that if it does not debut emptying then that it is a changing that does not tunnel hallux does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a lateness that it does not debut languor and it is not a kind of a Peary is not right. sent16: if the roost does not debut emptying then the fact that it changes and it does not tunnel hallux is false. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not an ideology that it does not furlough sordidness and is not a peanut is not right. sent18: if something is not a borate the fact that it does not work and is not a Psalter does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the roost does debut emptying is correct then that it does not change and it does not tunnel hallux is false. sent20: if the roost does not debut emptying then it is not a changing and it does not tunnel hallux. sent21: the fact that the roost does not change and it does not tunnel hallux is not true if it does not debut emptying. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__