if the reflecting islay does not occur the fact that the soteriologicalness occurs and the desert occurs is not correct.
sent1: the reflecting islay happens if the spawn occurs. sent2: that the waking proturan does not occur but the waking Satureja occurs triggers that the resulting metalwork does not occur. sent3: the fact that the soteriologicalness and the desert happens is wrong if the fact that the resulting metalwork does not occur hold. sent4: if the reflecting incurability does not occur then the waking Satureja and the sampling occurs. sent5: that the reflecting incurability does not occur is not false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the waking proturan occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reflecting islay does not occur.; sent4 & sent5 -> int1: both the waking Satureja and the sampling occurs.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the waking Satureja happens is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = if the reflecting islay does not occur the fact that the soteriologicalness occurs and the desert occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the reflecting islay happens if the spawn occurs. sent2: that the waking proturan does not occur but the waking Satureja occurs triggers that the resulting metalwork does not occur. sent3: the fact that the soteriologicalness and the desert happens is wrong if the fact that the resulting metalwork does not occur hold. sent4: if the reflecting incurability does not occur then the waking Satureja and the sampling occurs. sent5: that the reflecting incurability does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the waking proturan occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reflecting islay does not occur.; sent4 & sent5 -> int1: both the waking Satureja and the sampling occurs.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the waking Satureja happens is correct.; __UNKNOWN__