there exists something such that if it is both not a stomp and not acneiform the fact that it does not scald Mahdism is true.
sent1: if that something is both a stomp and not acneiform is not false then it does not scald Mahdism. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does not stomp and it is not acneiform is not incorrect then it scalds Mahdism. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Riley and does not bespangle tweediness then it is not a Abel. sent4: if the persimmon is not a stomp and is acneiform it does not scald Mahdism. sent5: something is not siliceous if it is not a kind of a beadsman and does not bespangle Anu. sent6: the persimmon does not scald Mahdism if it is a stomp and is not acneiform. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a stomp is not acneiform then it scalds Mahdism. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a bluestone and it does not bicycle then the fact that it does not untune is true. sent9: if something that is not a stomp is acneiform then it does not scald Mahdism. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not Tasmanian and is not a Millet it is not a Flemish. sent11: if the corporal does not immerse and it is non-bardic then it is not a kind of a Molidae. sent12: something is not a bicycling if it is not unprovocative and it is not a Fistulariidae. sent13: if the persimmon is not a kind of a naturalist and it is not high-tech then it is not acneiform. sent14: if the persimmon is not a stomp and is not acneiform then it does scald Mahdism. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a stomp and it is acneiform then it does not scald Mahdism. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a worth and it is not a kind of a decorum then it is not incomprehensible. sent17: there is something such that if it is a kind of a stomp and it is non-acneiform then it does not scald Mahdism. sent18: if something is not a Millet and it does not foxhunt it is not a Mantispidae.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is both not a stomp and not acneiform the fact that it does not scald Mahdism is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is both a stomp and not acneiform is not false then it does not scald Mahdism. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does not stomp and it is not acneiform is not incorrect then it scalds Mahdism. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Riley and does not bespangle tweediness then it is not a Abel. sent4: if the persimmon is not a stomp and is acneiform it does not scald Mahdism. sent5: something is not siliceous if it is not a kind of a beadsman and does not bespangle Anu. sent6: the persimmon does not scald Mahdism if it is a stomp and is not acneiform. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a stomp is not acneiform then it scalds Mahdism. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a bluestone and it does not bicycle then the fact that it does not untune is true. sent9: if something that is not a stomp is acneiform then it does not scald Mahdism. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not Tasmanian and is not a Millet it is not a Flemish. sent11: if the corporal does not immerse and it is non-bardic then it is not a kind of a Molidae. sent12: something is not a bicycling if it is not unprovocative and it is not a Fistulariidae. sent13: if the persimmon is not a kind of a naturalist and it is not high-tech then it is not acneiform. sent14: if the persimmon is not a stomp and is not acneiform then it does scald Mahdism. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a stomp and it is acneiform then it does not scald Mahdism. sent16: there is something such that if it is not a worth and it is not a kind of a decorum then it is not incomprehensible. sent17: there is something such that if it is a kind of a stomp and it is non-acneiform then it does not scald Mahdism. sent18: if something is not a Millet and it does not foxhunt it is not a Mantispidae. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__