the daub is not two-wheel and not a Simpson.
sent1: that the Samoan is euphemistic but it is not a kind of a tucked is not true. sent2: the longwool is a motorman. sent3: if the longwool is a kind of a motorman it grates lypressin. sent4: the hydroxyl does not undercut Walker. sent5: the hydroxyl does undercut amitriptyline if that that the Samoan is euphemistic but it is not a tucked is wrong is correct. sent6: if the fact that the hydroxyl is not predictable is not correct the longwool is a savory. sent7: if something that is a savory does grate lypressin it does not undercut daub. sent8: The Walker does not undercut hydroxyl. sent9: the amitriptyline is a kind of a Simpson and does partake if the longwool does not undercut daub. sent10: there exists something such that it is savory. sent11: if the Samoan does not undercut amitriptyline then it is two-wheel and undercuts Walker. sent12: the daub is both not two-wheel and not a Simpson if the amitriptyline is a kind of a Simpson.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the hydroxyl undercuts amitriptyline.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the hydroxyl does not undercut Walker and undercuts amitriptyline.; sent3 & sent2 -> int3: the longwool grates lypressin.; sent7 -> int4: the longwool does not undercut daub if it is savory thing that grates lypressin.;
the fact that the daub is both not two-wheel and not a Simpson is false.
$hypothesis$ = the daub is not two-wheel and not a Simpson. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Samoan is euphemistic but it is not a kind of a tucked is not true. sent2: the longwool is a motorman. sent3: if the longwool is a kind of a motorman it grates lypressin. sent4: the hydroxyl does not undercut Walker. sent5: the hydroxyl does undercut amitriptyline if that that the Samoan is euphemistic but it is not a tucked is wrong is correct. sent6: if the fact that the hydroxyl is not predictable is not correct the longwool is a savory. sent7: if something that is a savory does grate lypressin it does not undercut daub. sent8: The Walker does not undercut hydroxyl. sent9: the amitriptyline is a kind of a Simpson and does partake if the longwool does not undercut daub. sent10: there exists something such that it is savory. sent11: if the Samoan does not undercut amitriptyline then it is two-wheel and undercuts Walker. sent12: the daub is both not two-wheel and not a Simpson if the amitriptyline is a kind of a Simpson. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the hydroxyl undercuts amitriptyline.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the hydroxyl does not undercut Walker and undercuts amitriptyline.; sent3 & sent2 -> int3: the longwool grates lypressin.; sent7 -> int4: the longwool does not undercut daub if it is savory thing that grates lypressin.; __UNKNOWN__