the catheterization does not occur.
sent1: the quadrupedalness does not occur. sent2: the unrealisticness does not occur. sent3: if the smelt does not occur both the quadrupedalness and the idiomaticness happens. sent4: the closure does not occur if the catheterization and the econometricness happens. sent5: the Klondike or the closure or both occurs if the shortsness does not occur. sent6: that the non-shortsness and the non-quadrupedalness occurs is triggered by the non-idiomaticness. sent7: that the exclaiming xylose does not occur prevents that the econometricness does not occur. sent8: that the catheterization occurs and the ornithologicalness happens is caused by the non-econometricness. sent9: that not the digitigradeness but the exclaiming xylose occurs does not hold. sent10: if that the digitigradeness does not occur and the exclaiming xylose happens is wrong then the econometricness occurs. sent11: if that the smelling does not occur hold the fact that the idiomaticness happens but the unfairness does not occur is not true. sent12: the shorts occurs. sent13: if the fact that the quadrupedalness does not occur is not incorrect the Klondike happens and the shorts happens. sent14: if the quadrupedalness does not occur then the shortsness happens. sent15: that the Klondike occurs brings about the closure. sent16: the disreputableness occurs and the hypnotizing Karakoram occurs. sent17: that the catheterization does not occur is prevented by that not the econometricness but the closuring happens. sent18: the idiomaticness does not occur if that the idiomaticness happens but the unfairness does not occur does not hold.
sent10 & sent9 -> int1: the econometricness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the catheterization occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the catheterization and the econometricness happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the closure does not occur.; sent13 & sent1 -> int4: the Klondike happens and the shortsness happens.; int4 -> int5: the Klondike occurs.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the closuring occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the catheterization occurs is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the catheterization does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the quadrupedalness does not occur. sent2: the unrealisticness does not occur. sent3: if the smelt does not occur both the quadrupedalness and the idiomaticness happens. sent4: the closure does not occur if the catheterization and the econometricness happens. sent5: the Klondike or the closure or both occurs if the shortsness does not occur. sent6: that the non-shortsness and the non-quadrupedalness occurs is triggered by the non-idiomaticness. sent7: that the exclaiming xylose does not occur prevents that the econometricness does not occur. sent8: that the catheterization occurs and the ornithologicalness happens is caused by the non-econometricness. sent9: that not the digitigradeness but the exclaiming xylose occurs does not hold. sent10: if that the digitigradeness does not occur and the exclaiming xylose happens is wrong then the econometricness occurs. sent11: if that the smelling does not occur hold the fact that the idiomaticness happens but the unfairness does not occur is not true. sent12: the shorts occurs. sent13: if the fact that the quadrupedalness does not occur is not incorrect the Klondike happens and the shorts happens. sent14: if the quadrupedalness does not occur then the shortsness happens. sent15: that the Klondike occurs brings about the closure. sent16: the disreputableness occurs and the hypnotizing Karakoram occurs. sent17: that the catheterization does not occur is prevented by that not the econometricness but the closuring happens. sent18: the idiomaticness does not occur if that the idiomaticness happens but the unfairness does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent9 -> int1: the econometricness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the catheterization occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the catheterization and the econometricness happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the closure does not occur.; sent13 & sent1 -> int4: the Klondike happens and the shortsness happens.; int4 -> int5: the Klondike occurs.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the closuring occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__