the crocolite is not a Sumatran.
sent1: if a non-asymptotic thing is a goldfish that it is not non-Sumatran hold. sent2: the creche is not a kind of a carpospore. sent3: the fact that the plesiosaur is a kind of non-campylotropous thing that is adaxial does not hold if the courser ladles ketorolac. sent4: something is not asymptotic and is a goldfish if it does bury Lappland. sent5: the crocolite is a kind of a reassignment. sent6: if the mustang is not non-adaxial then it does not govern and is asymptotic. sent7: that the crocolite does not abuse gargoylism is false. sent8: if the trailhead does abuse sashay then it does bury leafhopper. sent9: if something is not a goldfish but it is Sumatran then it does abuse gargoylism. sent10: the Einstein buries Lappland. sent11: if the creche is not a carpospore the fact that it is lacustrine and is not undemocratic is wrong. sent12: something that buries CSE ladles ketorolac. sent13: if something is a kind of an affirmative it does not ladle coreference and it does hop propylthiouracil. sent14: the draw is a Sumatran. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not non-lacustrine and is not undemocratic is false the courser buries CSE. sent16: the crocolite abuses gentleness. sent17: the crocolite buries Lappland if it does abuse gargoylism. sent18: the crocolite is a principle. sent19: something that does bury Lappland is a goldfish. sent20: if the wallaby does not bury Lappland then that the alligatorfish is Sumatran and it abuses gargoylism is not right. sent21: That the gargoylism does not abuse crocolite is false. sent22: a jurisprudential thing is non-nonpasserine thing that is gonadotropic.
sent4 -> int1: if the crocolite buries Lappland then it is not asymptotic and it is a goldfish.; sent17 & sent7 -> int2: the crocolite buries Lappland.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crocolite is not asymptotic but it is a goldfish.; sent1 -> int4: the crocolite is a Sumatran if it is both not asymptotic and a goldfish.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the crocolite is not a Sumatran.
sent12 -> int5: if the courser buries CSE then it does ladle ketorolac.; sent11 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the creche is a kind of lacustrine thing that is not undemocratic is false.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is lacustrine and is not undemocratic is not true.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the courser does bury CSE.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the courser does ladle ketorolac.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: that the plesiosaur is not campylotropous but it is adaxial is not true.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not campylotropous and is adaxial is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the crocolite is not a Sumatran. ; $context$ = sent1: if a non-asymptotic thing is a goldfish that it is not non-Sumatran hold. sent2: the creche is not a kind of a carpospore. sent3: the fact that the plesiosaur is a kind of non-campylotropous thing that is adaxial does not hold if the courser ladles ketorolac. sent4: something is not asymptotic and is a goldfish if it does bury Lappland. sent5: the crocolite is a kind of a reassignment. sent6: if the mustang is not non-adaxial then it does not govern and is asymptotic. sent7: that the crocolite does not abuse gargoylism is false. sent8: if the trailhead does abuse sashay then it does bury leafhopper. sent9: if something is not a goldfish but it is Sumatran then it does abuse gargoylism. sent10: the Einstein buries Lappland. sent11: if the creche is not a carpospore the fact that it is lacustrine and is not undemocratic is wrong. sent12: something that buries CSE ladles ketorolac. sent13: if something is a kind of an affirmative it does not ladle coreference and it does hop propylthiouracil. sent14: the draw is a Sumatran. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not non-lacustrine and is not undemocratic is false the courser buries CSE. sent16: the crocolite abuses gentleness. sent17: the crocolite buries Lappland if it does abuse gargoylism. sent18: the crocolite is a principle. sent19: something that does bury Lappland is a goldfish. sent20: if the wallaby does not bury Lappland then that the alligatorfish is Sumatran and it abuses gargoylism is not right. sent21: That the gargoylism does not abuse crocolite is false. sent22: a jurisprudential thing is non-nonpasserine thing that is gonadotropic. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the crocolite buries Lappland then it is not asymptotic and it is a goldfish.; sent17 & sent7 -> int2: the crocolite buries Lappland.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crocolite is not asymptotic but it is a goldfish.; sent1 -> int4: the crocolite is a Sumatran if it is both not asymptotic and a goldfish.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__