the shambles is not Soviet and it is extricable.
sent1: a pivot is not a Montaigne and is a Stenotomus. sent2: the catcher does not farm. sent3: the shambles is extricable if there exists something such that the fact that it proposes polysemy and it fills Arenaviridae is false. sent4: the Cornish is not a kind of a prolamine and is not a Montaigne. sent5: there exists something such that it is a Stenotomus. sent6: that the Cornish is not a prolamine is not incorrect. sent7: something proposes catcher and is not a kind of a prolamine. sent8: there is something such that it is not a prolamine. sent9: the Cornish does not propose catcher and is not a prolamine if it is a pivot. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that that it proposes polysemy and fills Arenaviridae hold is incorrect. sent11: the Cornish is not a prolamine if it is a pivot. sent12: that the shambles is not inextricable is true if there exists something such that that it does not fill Arenaviridae is not incorrect. sent13: that there exists something such that that it is Soviet and is inextricable is not correct is not wrong. sent14: if the shambles is both bacteriolytic and a Montaigne then it is not Soviet. sent15: there exists something such that it proposes polysemy and it does fill Arenaviridae. sent16: if there exists something such that it is a Stenotomus the Cornish does pivot. sent17: there is something such that it does not propose catcher. sent18: the shambles is a kind of a Montaigne. sent19: there is something such that it does not propose catcher and is a kind of a prolamine.
sent5 & sent16 -> int1: the Cornish pivots.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Cornish does not propose catcher and is not a prolamine.; int2 -> int3: something does not propose catcher and is not a prolamine.; sent10 & sent3 -> int4: the shambles is not inextricable.;
the exode is not a Montaigne.
sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the exode is a kind of a pivot is not incorrect then it is not a Montaigne and it is a kind of a Stenotomus.;
$hypothesis$ = the shambles is not Soviet and it is extricable. ; $context$ = sent1: a pivot is not a Montaigne and is a Stenotomus. sent2: the catcher does not farm. sent3: the shambles is extricable if there exists something such that the fact that it proposes polysemy and it fills Arenaviridae is false. sent4: the Cornish is not a kind of a prolamine and is not a Montaigne. sent5: there exists something such that it is a Stenotomus. sent6: that the Cornish is not a prolamine is not incorrect. sent7: something proposes catcher and is not a kind of a prolamine. sent8: there is something such that it is not a prolamine. sent9: the Cornish does not propose catcher and is not a prolamine if it is a pivot. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that that it proposes polysemy and fills Arenaviridae hold is incorrect. sent11: the Cornish is not a prolamine if it is a pivot. sent12: that the shambles is not inextricable is true if there exists something such that that it does not fill Arenaviridae is not incorrect. sent13: that there exists something such that that it is Soviet and is inextricable is not correct is not wrong. sent14: if the shambles is both bacteriolytic and a Montaigne then it is not Soviet. sent15: there exists something such that it proposes polysemy and it does fill Arenaviridae. sent16: if there exists something such that it is a Stenotomus the Cornish does pivot. sent17: there is something such that it does not propose catcher. sent18: the shambles is a kind of a Montaigne. sent19: there is something such that it does not propose catcher and is a kind of a prolamine. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent16 -> int1: the Cornish pivots.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Cornish does not propose catcher and is not a prolamine.; int2 -> int3: something does not propose catcher and is not a prolamine.; sent10 & sent3 -> int4: the shambles is not inextricable.; __UNKNOWN__