the swan but not the repining Newgate occurs.
sent1: if the catching does not occur but the fronting endomorphy occurs that the welcoming does not occur is correct. sent2: the confusing CRT or the non-providentialness or both prevents the repining Newgate. sent3: if that the tapping does not occur and the PM does not occur does not hold the fact that the tapping occurs is not wrong. sent4: not the swanning but the coaching happens if the tapping happens. sent5: if the welcomeness does not occur then the fact that the tapping does not occur and the PM does not occur is wrong. sent6: both the swanning and the coaching happens. sent7: the fact that both the repining farmer and the stint occurs is not right. sent8: both the non-providentialness and the saunter occurs if the fact that the confusing CRT occurs hold. sent9: that both the radiotherapy and the non-forgetfulness occurs triggers the non-Napoleonicness. sent10: the saunter happens. sent11: if the Napoleonicness does not occur then the catch does not occur and the fronting endomorphy occurs. sent12: the non-providentialness is triggered by that the repining farmer but not the stinting happens. sent13: the fronting Epiphany does not occur if both the non-providentialness and the saunter happens. sent14: the saunter does not occur if the fact that the repining farmer happens but the stint does not occur does not hold. sent15: the stinting does not occur. sent16: if both the fronting silicon and the Shuhaness happens the confusing Bannockburn does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the repining farmer happens and the stinting does not occur is not true.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the saunter does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the repining farmer but not the stinting occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the providentialness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the confusing CRT occurs and/or the providentialness does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the repining Newgate does not occur.; sent6 -> int7: the swan occurs.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fronting Epiphany does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the swan but not the repining Newgate occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the catching does not occur but the fronting endomorphy occurs that the welcoming does not occur is correct. sent2: the confusing CRT or the non-providentialness or both prevents the repining Newgate. sent3: if that the tapping does not occur and the PM does not occur does not hold the fact that the tapping occurs is not wrong. sent4: not the swanning but the coaching happens if the tapping happens. sent5: if the welcomeness does not occur then the fact that the tapping does not occur and the PM does not occur is wrong. sent6: both the swanning and the coaching happens. sent7: the fact that both the repining farmer and the stint occurs is not right. sent8: both the non-providentialness and the saunter occurs if the fact that the confusing CRT occurs hold. sent9: that both the radiotherapy and the non-forgetfulness occurs triggers the non-Napoleonicness. sent10: the saunter happens. sent11: if the Napoleonicness does not occur then the catch does not occur and the fronting endomorphy occurs. sent12: the non-providentialness is triggered by that the repining farmer but not the stinting happens. sent13: the fronting Epiphany does not occur if both the non-providentialness and the saunter happens. sent14: the saunter does not occur if the fact that the repining farmer happens but the stint does not occur does not hold. sent15: the stinting does not occur. sent16: if both the fronting silicon and the Shuhaness happens the confusing Bannockburn does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the repining farmer happens and the stinting does not occur is not true.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the saunter does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the repining farmer but not the stinting occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the providentialness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the confusing CRT occurs and/or the providentialness does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the repining Newgate does not occur.; sent6 -> int7: the swan occurs.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__