that the columnist is a demon and fixes rationalism is incorrect.
sent1: if the parachutist fixes hurry and it is a landside the placoderm does not fix rationalism. sent2: if something is a kind of an instinct then it is a landside. sent3: the parachutist fixes hurry if the larid is not a pluralist and is orthotropous. sent4: something is not unrestrictive or it is an instinct or both. sent5: if the placoderm does not fix rationalism then that the columnist is a demon and it fix rationalism does not hold. sent6: the larid is not a kind of a pluralist. sent7: the larid is orthotropous. sent8: if something is restrictive and/or it is an instinct the parachutist is an instinct.
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the larid is not a kind of a pluralist but it is orthotropous.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the parachutist does fix hurry is true.; sent2 -> int3: if the parachutist is an instinct it is a landside.; sent4 & sent8 -> int4: the parachutist is an instinct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the parachutist is a landside.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the parachutist does fix hurry and it is a landside.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the placoderm does not fix rationalism is not false.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the columnist is a demon and fixes rationalism is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the parachutist fixes hurry and it is a landside the placoderm does not fix rationalism. sent2: if something is a kind of an instinct then it is a landside. sent3: the parachutist fixes hurry if the larid is not a pluralist and is orthotropous. sent4: something is not unrestrictive or it is an instinct or both. sent5: if the placoderm does not fix rationalism then that the columnist is a demon and it fix rationalism does not hold. sent6: the larid is not a kind of a pluralist. sent7: the larid is orthotropous. sent8: if something is restrictive and/or it is an instinct the parachutist is an instinct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the larid is not a kind of a pluralist but it is orthotropous.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the parachutist does fix hurry is true.; sent2 -> int3: if the parachutist is an instinct it is a landside.; sent4 & sent8 -> int4: the parachutist is an instinct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the parachutist is a landside.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the parachutist does fix hurry and it is a landside.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the placoderm does not fix rationalism is not false.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__