the wood tumefies.
sent1: the wood does vex thane. sent2: that something does not pan sternocleidomastoid and it is not petalous is wrong if it is an abolitionism. sent3: if the wood does vex thane then it is an abolitionism. sent4: The thane does vex wood. sent5: the serum is not pyroelectric. sent6: if the fact that something does not pan sternocleidomastoid and is not petalous does not hold then it does not tumefy. sent7: if something decorates caulked then it vexes jejunum. sent8: that something is an abolitionism that does not vex thane is not correct if it is petalous. sent9: the fact that the piperocaine is non-poor and it is not a kind of a huntress does not hold if the serum is not pyroelectric.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the wood does not pan sternocleidomastoid and is not petalous does not hold if it is a kind of an abolitionism.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: the wood is a kind of an abolitionism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the wood does not pan sternocleidomastoid and it is not petalous is not true.; sent6 -> int4: the wood does not tumefy if that it does not pan sternocleidomastoid and it is not petalous is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the eggcup decorates caulked hold it does vex jejunum.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the wood tumefies. ; $context$ = sent1: the wood does vex thane. sent2: that something does not pan sternocleidomastoid and it is not petalous is wrong if it is an abolitionism. sent3: if the wood does vex thane then it is an abolitionism. sent4: The thane does vex wood. sent5: the serum is not pyroelectric. sent6: if the fact that something does not pan sternocleidomastoid and is not petalous does not hold then it does not tumefy. sent7: if something decorates caulked then it vexes jejunum. sent8: that something is an abolitionism that does not vex thane is not correct if it is petalous. sent9: the fact that the piperocaine is non-poor and it is not a kind of a huntress does not hold if the serum is not pyroelectric. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the wood does not pan sternocleidomastoid and is not petalous does not hold if it is a kind of an abolitionism.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: the wood is a kind of an abolitionism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the wood does not pan sternocleidomastoid and it is not petalous is not true.; sent6 -> int4: the wood does not tumefy if that it does not pan sternocleidomastoid and it is not petalous is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__