that there exists something such that if it does not push telemetry then that it is not a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran is wrong is incorrect.
sent1: that the fact that something is not a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran is not incorrect is not correct if it does not push telemetry. sent2: that something is not a tailoring but it ashes disappearance is not true if it is not a Rush. sent3: the fact that something is not a kind of a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran does not hold if it does push telemetry. sent4: there is something such that if it is not efficient then the fact that it is not a bob and it is non-sphingine is not right. sent5: the fact that something is not efficient and is a pizzicato does not hold if it does not straighten onager. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a Heidegger but it does not contemplate Huascaran is false if that it does not push telemetry is not wrong. sent7: that the onager is not a kind of a Heidegger and does contemplate Huascaran is false if it does not push telemetry. sent8: something is not a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran if it does not push telemetry. sent9: that something is not a Heidegger and contemplates Huascaran is incorrect if it does not push telemetry. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does not push telemetry is correct the fact that it is a Heidegger and it does not contemplate Huascaran does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it does not push telemetry then the fact that it is not a Heidegger and it contemplates Huascaran is not right. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not pervious that it is not navigational and does not push uplink is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if it does not push drained then that it is not a band and is a kind of an inviting does not hold. sent14: if the onager does push telemetry then that it is not a kind of a Heidegger and it does not contemplate Huascaran is not true. sent15: if something is not an eyebrow the fact that it is not vocal and it is not a rennin is not true. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a triazolam then that it is not factory-made and not non-amnestic is false.
sent1 -> int1: that the onager is not a kind of a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran is not right if it does not push telemetry.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not an eyebrow then the fact that it is not a kind of a vocal and it is not a rennin is not correct.
sent15 -> int2: if the triquetral is not an eyebrow the fact that it is a kind of non-vocal thing that is not a kind of a rennin is not true.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not push telemetry then that it is not a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran is wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that something is not a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran is not incorrect is not correct if it does not push telemetry. sent2: that something is not a tailoring but it ashes disappearance is not true if it is not a Rush. sent3: the fact that something is not a kind of a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran does not hold if it does push telemetry. sent4: there is something such that if it is not efficient then the fact that it is not a bob and it is non-sphingine is not right. sent5: the fact that something is not efficient and is a pizzicato does not hold if it does not straighten onager. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a Heidegger but it does not contemplate Huascaran is false if that it does not push telemetry is not wrong. sent7: that the onager is not a kind of a Heidegger and does contemplate Huascaran is false if it does not push telemetry. sent8: something is not a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran if it does not push telemetry. sent9: that something is not a Heidegger and contemplates Huascaran is incorrect if it does not push telemetry. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does not push telemetry is correct the fact that it is a Heidegger and it does not contemplate Huascaran does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it does not push telemetry then the fact that it is not a Heidegger and it contemplates Huascaran is not right. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not pervious that it is not navigational and does not push uplink is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if it does not push drained then that it is not a band and is a kind of an inviting does not hold. sent14: if the onager does push telemetry then that it is not a kind of a Heidegger and it does not contemplate Huascaran is not true. sent15: if something is not an eyebrow the fact that it is not vocal and it is not a rennin is not true. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a triazolam then that it is not factory-made and not non-amnestic is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: that the onager is not a kind of a Heidegger and does not contemplate Huascaran is not right if it does not push telemetry.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__