the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a reflectance and it does deserve torticollis is not right then it does weave does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not teratogenic it does strangulate clambake. sent2: the cannibal is a woven if that it is not a reflectance and deserves torticollis is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it is a shaman then it is a kind of a Norwegian. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is non-bilabial and does personify is not correct then it is a yearbook. sent5: if the cannibal does not deserve torticollis then the fact that it weaves is right. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of wintry thing that is a kind of a Lopholatilus does not hold then the fact that it calves is true. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not deserve torticollis then it is a woven. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a reflectance and deserves torticollis then it does weave. sent9: if the fact that something does not school Austrian but it is a kind of a reflectance does not hold it uploads. sent10: if that the cannibal is not bilabial but loamless is false it does deserve torticollis. sent11: the archdeaconry is a reflectance if the fact that it is a manger and a larboard is not right.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if that the Taos does not school Austrian and is a reflectance is incorrect the fact that it uploads hold.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a reflectance and it does deserve torticollis is not right then it does weave does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not teratogenic it does strangulate clambake. sent2: the cannibal is a woven if that it is not a reflectance and deserves torticollis is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it is a shaman then it is a kind of a Norwegian. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is non-bilabial and does personify is not correct then it is a yearbook. sent5: if the cannibal does not deserve torticollis then the fact that it weaves is right. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of wintry thing that is a kind of a Lopholatilus does not hold then the fact that it calves is true. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not deserve torticollis then it is a woven. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a reflectance and deserves torticollis then it does weave. sent9: if the fact that something does not school Austrian but it is a kind of a reflectance does not hold it uploads. sent10: if that the cannibal is not bilabial but loamless is false it does deserve torticollis. sent11: the archdeaconry is a reflectance if the fact that it is a manger and a larboard is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__