the defoliating antidote does not occur if the complaining happens.
sent1: the non-cordlessness prevents the overpayment. sent2: the defoliating antidote does not occur if that the baboonishness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if the hilarness does not occur then the complecting Callithrix does not occur. sent4: the ineligibleness does not occur if the complecting Plymouth happens. sent5: the cordlessness does not occur and/or the lambing bullfighter does not occur. sent6: that the lambing bullfighter does not occur prevents that the overpayment happens. sent7: if the cordlessness does not occur the baboonishness does not occur. sent8: if the Genoese occurs the bioelectricity does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the complaining occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cordlessness occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the lambing bullfighter happens or the cordlessness happens or both.;
the overpayment does not occur.
sent5 & sent1 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the defoliating antidote does not occur if the complaining happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-cordlessness prevents the overpayment. sent2: the defoliating antidote does not occur if that the baboonishness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if the hilarness does not occur then the complecting Callithrix does not occur. sent4: the ineligibleness does not occur if the complecting Plymouth happens. sent5: the cordlessness does not occur and/or the lambing bullfighter does not occur. sent6: that the lambing bullfighter does not occur prevents that the overpayment happens. sent7: if the cordlessness does not occur the baboonishness does not occur. sent8: if the Genoese occurs the bioelectricity does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the complaining occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cordlessness occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the lambing bullfighter happens or the cordlessness happens or both.; __UNKNOWN__