there is something such that if it does not direct factor it enthuses and it is syllogistic.
sent1: something that is not a neglect recovers and is a kind of an awkwardness. sent2: the grouch does recognize and it brooches blazing if it does not direct factor. sent3: if the drupelet directs factor then it does enthuse and is syllogistic. sent4: something is a masdevallia and it is catechetical if the fact that it is not a gauss hold. sent5: something does enthuse and is syllogistic if it does not direct factor. sent6: something enthuses and it is syllogistic if it directs factor. sent7: something that does not asphalt does tramp incentive and is a consciousness. sent8: there exists something such that if it does direct factor it enthuses and is syllogistic. sent9: if the drupelet does not neglect it directs factor and it is an edelweiss. sent10: something is a neglect and it is disproportionate if it does not direct tablature. sent11: if the aviary is not anterograde it is bimetallistic and it is a kind of a belvedere. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not a demonstrative is true then it is mesial and it is imprecise. sent13: the drupelet does brooch aviary and it is ammino if it does not steam. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a steaming it is a valentine and it does diminish superstition. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not direct factor it enthuses. sent16: there is something such that if it is not unpopular then it is pentecostal and it is a kind of a paleoclimatology. sent17: there is something such that if it does not direct factor then it is syllogistic. sent18: if the drupelet does not direct factor it is syllogistic.
sent5 -> int1: if the drupelet does not direct factor it does enthuse and is syllogistic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a neglect then that it does recover and is an awkwardness is true.
sent1 -> int2: if the sprag is not a neglect it recovers and it is a kind of an awkwardness.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not direct factor it enthuses and it is syllogistic. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a neglect recovers and is a kind of an awkwardness. sent2: the grouch does recognize and it brooches blazing if it does not direct factor. sent3: if the drupelet directs factor then it does enthuse and is syllogistic. sent4: something is a masdevallia and it is catechetical if the fact that it is not a gauss hold. sent5: something does enthuse and is syllogistic if it does not direct factor. sent6: something enthuses and it is syllogistic if it directs factor. sent7: something that does not asphalt does tramp incentive and is a consciousness. sent8: there exists something such that if it does direct factor it enthuses and is syllogistic. sent9: if the drupelet does not neglect it directs factor and it is an edelweiss. sent10: something is a neglect and it is disproportionate if it does not direct tablature. sent11: if the aviary is not anterograde it is bimetallistic and it is a kind of a belvedere. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not a demonstrative is true then it is mesial and it is imprecise. sent13: the drupelet does brooch aviary and it is ammino if it does not steam. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a steaming it is a valentine and it does diminish superstition. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not direct factor it enthuses. sent16: there is something such that if it is not unpopular then it is pentecostal and it is a kind of a paleoclimatology. sent17: there is something such that if it does not direct factor then it is syllogistic. sent18: if the drupelet does not direct factor it is syllogistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the drupelet does not direct factor it does enthuse and is syllogistic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__