that if the fact that the radiometer is not productive hold then the fact that the lurker is not regretful and is not a Nazi is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the tremble is not plus but it underquotes battlesight is not true if it is not regretful. sent2: if the chemisorption pedals then the fact that the lurker is a kind of unregretful thing that is plus does not hold. sent3: if something does not underquote battlesight that it does not underquote trusty and is not a stifle does not hold. sent4: if the tremble underquotes battlesight and it does underquote trusty then the bacitracin is not plus. sent5: if the fact that the tremble does not underquote battlesight and underquotes trusty hold then the bacitracin is not plus. sent6: the unau is unproductive if the fact that the radiometer does not underquote trusty and it does not stifle is not right. sent7: that the bacitracin is plus but it is not productive does not hold if the radiometer is not regretful. sent8: if the fact that the radiometer is not productive is not false that the lurker is both not regretful and Nazi is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the lurker is both not regretful and not a Nazi is wrong if there are non-plus things. sent10: if the radiometer is not a stifle the tremble does not underquote battlesight but it underquotes trusty. sent11: if the tremble does underquote trusty the radiometer is either not a stifle or not productive or both. sent12: the tremble underquotes trusty if the bacitracin underquotes battlesight. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not plus then the fact that the lurker is not regretful and is not non-Nazi is not true. sent14: if the radiometer is not productive then it does not stifle. sent15: the tremble is not regretful if that the bacitracin is not regretful and is not pedal is not true. sent16: the redfish does not underquote French.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the radiometer is not productive.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the radiometer is not a stifle.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the tremble does not underquote battlesight and underquotes trusty.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: that the bacitracin is not plus is correct.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not plus.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the lurker is not regretful and it is not a kind of a Nazi does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the unau is not productive.
sent3 -> int6: if the radiometer does not underquote battlesight that it does not underquote trusty and it is not a kind of a stifle is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the radiometer is not productive hold then the fact that the lurker is not regretful and is not a Nazi is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the tremble is not plus but it underquotes battlesight is not true if it is not regretful. sent2: if the chemisorption pedals then the fact that the lurker is a kind of unregretful thing that is plus does not hold. sent3: if something does not underquote battlesight that it does not underquote trusty and is not a stifle does not hold. sent4: if the tremble underquotes battlesight and it does underquote trusty then the bacitracin is not plus. sent5: if the fact that the tremble does not underquote battlesight and underquotes trusty hold then the bacitracin is not plus. sent6: the unau is unproductive if the fact that the radiometer does not underquote trusty and it does not stifle is not right. sent7: that the bacitracin is plus but it is not productive does not hold if the radiometer is not regretful. sent8: if the fact that the radiometer is not productive is not false that the lurker is both not regretful and Nazi is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the lurker is both not regretful and not a Nazi is wrong if there are non-plus things. sent10: if the radiometer is not a stifle the tremble does not underquote battlesight but it underquotes trusty. sent11: if the tremble does underquote trusty the radiometer is either not a stifle or not productive or both. sent12: the tremble underquotes trusty if the bacitracin underquotes battlesight. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not plus then the fact that the lurker is not regretful and is not non-Nazi is not true. sent14: if the radiometer is not productive then it does not stifle. sent15: the tremble is not regretful if that the bacitracin is not regretful and is not pedal is not true. sent16: the redfish does not underquote French. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the radiometer is not productive.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the radiometer is not a stifle.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the tremble does not underquote battlesight and underquotes trusty.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: that the bacitracin is not plus is correct.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not plus.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the lurker is not regretful and it is not a kind of a Nazi does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__