the laterite is not genetic.
sent1: if the laterite is not a Devi the fact that it is genetic is not right. sent2: if the fact that something is shamanist and does not describe question is incorrect then it is not shamanist. sent3: the paster is not agranulocytic if the maroon is not shamanist and it is not a cascabel. sent4: if the fact that the paster exempts Day and it does pulsate is false then it does not exempts Day. sent5: the fact that something does exempt Day and it does pulsate is incorrect if it is not infallible. sent6: The question describes two-by-four. sent7: the maroon is not shamanist. sent8: if the two-by-four is genetic the laterite is genetic. sent9: the fact that something is agranulocytic but it does not describe question is wrong if it does not exempt Day. sent10: if something does not exempt Day or it pulsates or both it does not exempt Day. sent11: the paster is not a divarication if there exists something such that it does pulsate. sent12: the fact that everything does not exempt Day and/or it pulsates hold. sent13: the two-by-four describes question. sent14: the two-by-four is not shamanist. sent15: if something does not exempt Day that the fact that the two-by-four does exempt Day and is not agranulocytic is correct does not hold. sent16: the laterite is not infallible if the fact that the paster does pulsate but it does not exempt Day is not right. sent17: if the fact that there is something such that that it is not shamanist and it is not a cascabel is not correct is not false the two-by-four does not describe question. sent18: if something is not infallible that it is a kind of a Devi and is not a kind of a divarication is not correct. sent19: the laterite is not genetic if that it is both a Devi and not a divarication is incorrect. sent20: if that the two-by-four exempts Day but it is not agranulocytic is wrong then the defecation is not agranulocytic. sent21: the fact that something pulsates and it exempts Day is not correct if the fact that it is not agranulocytic is not false. sent22: the fact that the maroon is shamanist but it is not a cascabel is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the maroon is both not shamanist and not a cascabel is false.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not shamanist and is not a cascabel is not right.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the two-by-four does not describe question.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the maroon is not shamanist and it is not a cascabel.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the paster is not agranulocytic.; sent18 -> int6: if the laterite is not infallible then that the fact that it is both a Devi and not a divarication is not wrong is not true.;
the defecation is not shamanist.
sent2 -> int7: if the fact that the defecation is shamanist and does not describe question does not hold it is not shamanist.; sent5 -> int8: that the laterite exempts Day and it does pulsate does not hold if it is not infallible.;
$hypothesis$ = the laterite is not genetic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the laterite is not a Devi the fact that it is genetic is not right. sent2: if the fact that something is shamanist and does not describe question is incorrect then it is not shamanist. sent3: the paster is not agranulocytic if the maroon is not shamanist and it is not a cascabel. sent4: if the fact that the paster exempts Day and it does pulsate is false then it does not exempts Day. sent5: the fact that something does exempt Day and it does pulsate is incorrect if it is not infallible. sent6: The question describes two-by-four. sent7: the maroon is not shamanist. sent8: if the two-by-four is genetic the laterite is genetic. sent9: the fact that something is agranulocytic but it does not describe question is wrong if it does not exempt Day. sent10: if something does not exempt Day or it pulsates or both it does not exempt Day. sent11: the paster is not a divarication if there exists something such that it does pulsate. sent12: the fact that everything does not exempt Day and/or it pulsates hold. sent13: the two-by-four describes question. sent14: the two-by-four is not shamanist. sent15: if something does not exempt Day that the fact that the two-by-four does exempt Day and is not agranulocytic is correct does not hold. sent16: the laterite is not infallible if the fact that the paster does pulsate but it does not exempt Day is not right. sent17: if the fact that there is something such that that it is not shamanist and it is not a cascabel is not correct is not false the two-by-four does not describe question. sent18: if something is not infallible that it is a kind of a Devi and is not a kind of a divarication is not correct. sent19: the laterite is not genetic if that it is both a Devi and not a divarication is incorrect. sent20: if that the two-by-four exempts Day but it is not agranulocytic is wrong then the defecation is not agranulocytic. sent21: the fact that something pulsates and it exempts Day is not correct if the fact that it is not agranulocytic is not false. sent22: the fact that the maroon is shamanist but it is not a cascabel is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the maroon is both not shamanist and not a cascabel is false.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not shamanist and is not a cascabel is not right.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the two-by-four does not describe question.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the maroon is not shamanist and it is not a cascabel.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the paster is not agranulocytic.; sent18 -> int6: if the laterite is not infallible then that the fact that it is both a Devi and not a divarication is not wrong is not true.; __UNKNOWN__