the fact that the bindery refines Blissus and does not impede Springfield is false if the circlet does refine Brummell.
sent1: the mestranol does impede Springfield and does not nestle. sent2: if the bindery refines Brummell then that that the circlet impedes Springfield and it is a kind of a cycle hold is not right. sent3: if the circlet does not impede Springfield then the bindery does refine Brummell but it does not impede Springfield. sent4: if the circlet refines Brummell and/or it does not refine Blissus then the broadloom refine Blissus. sent5: the fact that the fact that the bindery refines Blissus and it is a cycle does not hold is right. sent6: if the circlet refines Brummell then that the bindery refines Blissus and it impedes Springfield is not true. sent7: if the broad does not impede Springfield that the bindery does refine Blissus and it does impede Springfield is incorrect. sent8: if the broad does not impede Springfield then the fact that the fact that the bindery refines Blissus but it does not impede Springfield is right is false. sent9: if the broad does not refine Blissus the fact that the bindery does impede Springfield but it does not refine Blissus is not correct. sent10: that the circlet does refine Blissus and does refine Brummell is wrong. sent11: if the broad does not impede Springfield the fact that the circlet is a kind of a cycle and does not impede Springfield is not right. sent12: the circlet cycles. sent13: the materialization does impede Springfield. sent14: that the bindery refines Blissus and impedes Springfield is not true. sent15: the fact that the bindery does refine Brummell but it is not a cycle is not correct if the broad does impede Springfield. sent16: the circlet is not non-overhead. sent17: that the circlet does impede Springfield and does not refine Brummell is false if the broad does not refine Brummell. sent18: the circlet impedes Springfield but it does not cycle if the bindery refines Brummell. sent19: the broad does not impede Springfield if the circlet refines Blissus and it is a cycle. sent20: the circlet does refine Blissus and does not impede Springfield if the broad refines Brummell. sent21: that the circlet refines Brummell and it does impede Springfield is wrong if the broad is a cycle. sent22: that the bindery is a kind of a cycle and impedes Springfield is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the circlet does refine Brummell.; assump1 & sent12 -> int1: the circlet refines Brummell and does cycle.;
the broadloom refines Blissus.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bindery refines Blissus and does not impede Springfield is false if the circlet does refine Brummell. ; $context$ = sent1: the mestranol does impede Springfield and does not nestle. sent2: if the bindery refines Brummell then that that the circlet impedes Springfield and it is a kind of a cycle hold is not right. sent3: if the circlet does not impede Springfield then the bindery does refine Brummell but it does not impede Springfield. sent4: if the circlet refines Brummell and/or it does not refine Blissus then the broadloom refine Blissus. sent5: the fact that the fact that the bindery refines Blissus and it is a cycle does not hold is right. sent6: if the circlet refines Brummell then that the bindery refines Blissus and it impedes Springfield is not true. sent7: if the broad does not impede Springfield that the bindery does refine Blissus and it does impede Springfield is incorrect. sent8: if the broad does not impede Springfield then the fact that the fact that the bindery refines Blissus but it does not impede Springfield is right is false. sent9: if the broad does not refine Blissus the fact that the bindery does impede Springfield but it does not refine Blissus is not correct. sent10: that the circlet does refine Blissus and does refine Brummell is wrong. sent11: if the broad does not impede Springfield the fact that the circlet is a kind of a cycle and does not impede Springfield is not right. sent12: the circlet cycles. sent13: the materialization does impede Springfield. sent14: that the bindery refines Blissus and impedes Springfield is not true. sent15: the fact that the bindery does refine Brummell but it is not a cycle is not correct if the broad does impede Springfield. sent16: the circlet is not non-overhead. sent17: that the circlet does impede Springfield and does not refine Brummell is false if the broad does not refine Brummell. sent18: the circlet impedes Springfield but it does not cycle if the bindery refines Brummell. sent19: the broad does not impede Springfield if the circlet refines Blissus and it is a cycle. sent20: the circlet does refine Blissus and does not impede Springfield if the broad refines Brummell. sent21: that the circlet refines Brummell and it does impede Springfield is wrong if the broad is a cycle. sent22: that the bindery is a kind of a cycle and impedes Springfield is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the circlet does refine Brummell.; assump1 & sent12 -> int1: the circlet refines Brummell and does cycle.; __UNKNOWN__