the fact that there is something such that if it is syncategorematic then it is neuromuscular hold.
sent1: if the gate is antistrophic it is not a kind of a blackheart. sent2: if the canine is an awe it does not harshen capitate and it is arbitrable. sent3: the canine is not antistrophic. sent4: the fly is syncategorematic if the provocateur is a wordmonger. sent5: that the canine does serenade Hesiod is not wrong if it does consider canine. sent6: if the canine is syncategorematic it is not antistrophic. sent7: if the canine is syncategorematic then it is not antistrophic and it is neuromuscular. sent8: the canine is non-antistrophic but not non-Ugandan. sent9: if the fly is syncategorematic the canine does consider fly. sent10: the canine is a kind of outboard thing that is a Mimamsa if it divides.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canine is syncategorematic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the canine is not antistrophic but it is neuromuscular hold.; int1 -> int2: the canine is neuromuscular.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the canine is syncategorematic it is neuromuscular.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the canine considers fly.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is syncategorematic then it is neuromuscular hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gate is antistrophic it is not a kind of a blackheart. sent2: if the canine is an awe it does not harshen capitate and it is arbitrable. sent3: the canine is not antistrophic. sent4: the fly is syncategorematic if the provocateur is a wordmonger. sent5: that the canine does serenade Hesiod is not wrong if it does consider canine. sent6: if the canine is syncategorematic it is not antistrophic. sent7: if the canine is syncategorematic then it is not antistrophic and it is neuromuscular. sent8: the canine is non-antistrophic but not non-Ugandan. sent9: if the fly is syncategorematic the canine does consider fly. sent10: the canine is a kind of outboard thing that is a Mimamsa if it divides. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canine is syncategorematic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the canine is not antistrophic but it is neuromuscular hold.; int1 -> int2: the canine is neuromuscular.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the canine is syncategorematic it is neuromuscular.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__