that the wreck does not meet soccer and/or is a kind of a titterer does not hold.
sent1: if that the hologram does meet soccer is not incorrect then the wreck does not meet soccer and/or it is a kind of a titterer. sent2: something meets baffled or it is not a Wain or both if it is not hermeneutic. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-chelate and non-anticlimactic is not right. sent4: if something is a kind of a titterer then that it meets soccer and it is not hermeneutic is not correct. sent5: if the officeholder is insentient the bubbler is insentient. sent6: if the fact that the lactifuge is not a namer is not false that it is a relinquishment and it is not insentient is false. sent7: that the fact that the yarder is not a Methuselah is not false if the cuticle is not a Pacific is not wrong. sent8: the wreck is a kind of a Brazilian if the yarder is a Brazilian. sent9: if the hologram is a Wain that the wreck is a Wain and/or it is a titterer is correct. sent10: the hologram is not hermeneutic if a defensive thing is not Brazilian. sent11: something is not hermeneutic if it is not non-Brazilian and not non-defensive. sent12: if the fact that something meets souse but it does not receive hydroxychloroquine is false then it is not a namer. sent13: if the fact that the fact that the lactifuge is a relinquishment and not insentient is true does not hold then the officeholder is insentient. sent14: something is not a lamb and is not a snorkel if it is not a kind of an insulator. sent15: if something that is not a lamb is not a snorkel then the fact that the cuticle is not a Pacific is correct. sent16: the woofer is not an insulator if there exists something such that that it is not chelate and it is not anticlimactic is false. sent17: the cangue is not insentient if the bubbler is insentient. sent18: there is something such that it is a kind of a defensive and it is not a kind of a Brazilian. sent19: if the cangue is not insentient the wreck is cervical and it is a kind of a defensive. sent20: if the yarder is not a Methuselah then it is scriptural a Brazilian. sent21: if something meets baffled and/or it is not a kind of a Wain then it meets soccer. sent22: the hologram does meet timucu and/or does meet Youngstown. sent23: if the hologram meets soccer the wreck meets soccer or is a titterer or both.
sent2 -> int1: if the hologram is not hermeneutic then it does meet baffled and/or it is not a Wain.; sent18 & sent10 -> int2: the hologram is not hermeneutic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hologram does meet baffled and/or it is not a kind of a Wain.; sent21 -> int4: the hologram does meet soccer if it either does meet baffled or is not a kind of a Wain or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hologram meets soccer.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the wreck does not meet soccer and/or it is a titterer is incorrect.
sent11 -> int6: the wreck is not hermeneutic if it is not non-Brazilian and it is a defensive.; sent14 -> int7: the woofer is not a kind of a lamb and it is not a snorkel if that it is not a kind of an insulator hold.; sent3 & sent16 -> int8: the woofer is not an insulator.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the woofer is not a lamb and it does not snorkel.; int9 -> int10: something is not a lamb and not a snorkel.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the cuticle is not a Pacific.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the yarder is not a Methuselah.; sent20 & int12 -> int13: the yarder is scriptural and it is a Brazilian.; int13 -> int14: the yarder is Brazilian.; sent8 & int14 -> int15: the wreck is a Brazilian.; sent12 -> int16: if that the lactifuge meets souse but it does not receive hydroxychloroquine is incorrect then it is not a namer.;
$hypothesis$ = that the wreck does not meet soccer and/or is a kind of a titterer does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the hologram does meet soccer is not incorrect then the wreck does not meet soccer and/or it is a kind of a titterer. sent2: something meets baffled or it is not a Wain or both if it is not hermeneutic. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-chelate and non-anticlimactic is not right. sent4: if something is a kind of a titterer then that it meets soccer and it is not hermeneutic is not correct. sent5: if the officeholder is insentient the bubbler is insentient. sent6: if the fact that the lactifuge is not a namer is not false that it is a relinquishment and it is not insentient is false. sent7: that the fact that the yarder is not a Methuselah is not false if the cuticle is not a Pacific is not wrong. sent8: the wreck is a kind of a Brazilian if the yarder is a Brazilian. sent9: if the hologram is a Wain that the wreck is a Wain and/or it is a titterer is correct. sent10: the hologram is not hermeneutic if a defensive thing is not Brazilian. sent11: something is not hermeneutic if it is not non-Brazilian and not non-defensive. sent12: if the fact that something meets souse but it does not receive hydroxychloroquine is false then it is not a namer. sent13: if the fact that the fact that the lactifuge is a relinquishment and not insentient is true does not hold then the officeholder is insentient. sent14: something is not a lamb and is not a snorkel if it is not a kind of an insulator. sent15: if something that is not a lamb is not a snorkel then the fact that the cuticle is not a Pacific is correct. sent16: the woofer is not an insulator if there exists something such that that it is not chelate and it is not anticlimactic is false. sent17: the cangue is not insentient if the bubbler is insentient. sent18: there is something such that it is a kind of a defensive and it is not a kind of a Brazilian. sent19: if the cangue is not insentient the wreck is cervical and it is a kind of a defensive. sent20: if the yarder is not a Methuselah then it is scriptural a Brazilian. sent21: if something meets baffled and/or it is not a kind of a Wain then it meets soccer. sent22: the hologram does meet timucu and/or does meet Youngstown. sent23: if the hologram meets soccer the wreck meets soccer or is a titterer or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the hologram is not hermeneutic then it does meet baffled and/or it is not a Wain.; sent18 & sent10 -> int2: the hologram is not hermeneutic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hologram does meet baffled and/or it is not a kind of a Wain.; sent21 -> int4: the hologram does meet soccer if it either does meet baffled or is not a kind of a Wain or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hologram meets soccer.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__