the skink services harvest-lice.
sent1: the RAS does not reface pine. sent2: if the acoustics does not service annulment then the Twinkie does not fracture Rhexia but it does fracture rorqual. sent3: the Twinkie does not service annulment if there is something such that that it is not a pegmatite and is a Luba is not true. sent4: the Twinkie does fracture rorqual. sent5: The annulment does not service acoustics. sent6: if the acoustics does not service annulment then the Twinkie does fracture rorqual. sent7: if the acoustics does service annulment the skink does fracture Rhexia. sent8: if the switchboard is a darkroom then that that the numdah is not a pegmatite and is a Luba is not false is wrong. sent9: the fact that the acoustics services harvest-lice and it is a Merida is not right if the Twinkie does not service annulment. sent10: the skink does not fracture rorqual but it does fracture Rhexia if the Twinkie does not service harvest-lice. sent11: the baptistry fractures Ariana and is not a kind of a mollycoddle if the RAS does not reface pine. sent12: if the fact that something is not a Luba and it is not a pegmatite does not hold it is not a kind of a Merida. sent13: the fact that the baptistry is not paternal if the baptistry does fracture Ariana and is not a kind of a mollycoddle is not incorrect. sent14: something that is not a cantillation is a kind of a sensitizer that is not a darkroom. sent15: the switchboard is a darkroom and it is a kind of a sensitizer if the fact that it is not a cantillation hold. sent16: if the fact that the Twinkie is not a Merida hold the acoustics does service harvest-lice and it services annulment. sent17: if the Twinkie does not fracture Rhexia but it fractures rorqual then the skink services harvest-lice. sent18: if the numdah is not a darkroom then the fact that the Twinkie is not a kind of a Luba and it is not a kind of a pegmatite is not correct.
the skink does fracture Rhexia.
sent12 -> int1: the Twinkie is not a kind of a Merida if that it is both not a Luba and not a pegmatite is false.; sent14 -> int2: if the numdah is not a cantillation then the fact that it is a sensitizer and is not a kind of a darkroom is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the skink services harvest-lice. ; $context$ = sent1: the RAS does not reface pine. sent2: if the acoustics does not service annulment then the Twinkie does not fracture Rhexia but it does fracture rorqual. sent3: the Twinkie does not service annulment if there is something such that that it is not a pegmatite and is a Luba is not true. sent4: the Twinkie does fracture rorqual. sent5: The annulment does not service acoustics. sent6: if the acoustics does not service annulment then the Twinkie does fracture rorqual. sent7: if the acoustics does service annulment the skink does fracture Rhexia. sent8: if the switchboard is a darkroom then that that the numdah is not a pegmatite and is a Luba is not false is wrong. sent9: the fact that the acoustics services harvest-lice and it is a Merida is not right if the Twinkie does not service annulment. sent10: the skink does not fracture rorqual but it does fracture Rhexia if the Twinkie does not service harvest-lice. sent11: the baptistry fractures Ariana and is not a kind of a mollycoddle if the RAS does not reface pine. sent12: if the fact that something is not a Luba and it is not a pegmatite does not hold it is not a kind of a Merida. sent13: the fact that the baptistry is not paternal if the baptistry does fracture Ariana and is not a kind of a mollycoddle is not incorrect. sent14: something that is not a cantillation is a kind of a sensitizer that is not a darkroom. sent15: the switchboard is a darkroom and it is a kind of a sensitizer if the fact that it is not a cantillation hold. sent16: if the fact that the Twinkie is not a Merida hold the acoustics does service harvest-lice and it services annulment. sent17: if the Twinkie does not fracture Rhexia but it fractures rorqual then the skink services harvest-lice. sent18: if the numdah is not a darkroom then the fact that the Twinkie is not a kind of a Luba and it is not a kind of a pegmatite is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__