the osmiridium is not a mishap.
sent1: the osmiridium is both isotopic and quarterly. sent2: that the fact that the iceboat is not a kind of a Leon is wrong if the osmiridium is a Leon hold. sent3: the flyover is not quarterly. sent4: the osmiridium does rehabilitate nard. sent5: the flyover is not a mishap. sent6: the indigo is a kind of a Leon. sent7: that the flyover is not impetiginous hold. sent8: the flyover does rehabilitate dangleberry. sent9: if the osmiridium is a mishap and is isotopic the flyover is not a Leon. sent10: if something is not a quarterly but it is a mishap then it is not isotopic. sent11: the osmiridium is not a Leon. sent12: the flyover does spend intestine and it is a twiddle. sent13: if the flyover is not isotopic then it rehabilitates dangleberry and it is a Leon. sent14: if something is a kind of a Leon then the fact that it is not a kind of a quarterly and is not isotopic is false. sent15: that the flyover is not impetiginous or does not rehabilitate dangleberry or both does not hold if it is not dramatics. sent16: if something is not impetiginous then it does rehabilitate dangleberry. sent17: something that is not impetiginous is a Leon and does rehabilitate dangleberry. sent18: the hypanthium is not non-impetiginous and it is big. sent19: the flyover accounts. sent20: the fact that the gametangium is isotopic is right. sent21: that the biggin is a kind of a mishap hold. sent22: the flyover is isotopic. sent23: the flyover spends Pasteur and it labors highjacker. sent24: the osmiridium is not a whisker.
sent1 -> int1: the osmiridium is isotopic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the osmiridium is a mishap.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the osmiridium is a mishap and it is isotopic is not false.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the flyover is not a Leon is not incorrect.; sent17 -> int4: the flyover is a kind of a Leon and it does rehabilitate dangleberry if it is not impetiginous.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the flyover is a Leon and rehabilitates dangleberry.; int5 -> int6: the flyover is a Leon.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the osmiridium is a mishap.
sent14 -> int8: if the osmiridium is a Leon then the fact that it is not quarterly and not isotopic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the osmiridium is not a mishap. ; $context$ = sent1: the osmiridium is both isotopic and quarterly. sent2: that the fact that the iceboat is not a kind of a Leon is wrong if the osmiridium is a Leon hold. sent3: the flyover is not quarterly. sent4: the osmiridium does rehabilitate nard. sent5: the flyover is not a mishap. sent6: the indigo is a kind of a Leon. sent7: that the flyover is not impetiginous hold. sent8: the flyover does rehabilitate dangleberry. sent9: if the osmiridium is a mishap and is isotopic the flyover is not a Leon. sent10: if something is not a quarterly but it is a mishap then it is not isotopic. sent11: the osmiridium is not a Leon. sent12: the flyover does spend intestine and it is a twiddle. sent13: if the flyover is not isotopic then it rehabilitates dangleberry and it is a Leon. sent14: if something is a kind of a Leon then the fact that it is not a kind of a quarterly and is not isotopic is false. sent15: that the flyover is not impetiginous or does not rehabilitate dangleberry or both does not hold if it is not dramatics. sent16: if something is not impetiginous then it does rehabilitate dangleberry. sent17: something that is not impetiginous is a Leon and does rehabilitate dangleberry. sent18: the hypanthium is not non-impetiginous and it is big. sent19: the flyover accounts. sent20: the fact that the gametangium is isotopic is right. sent21: that the biggin is a kind of a mishap hold. sent22: the flyover is isotopic. sent23: the flyover spends Pasteur and it labors highjacker. sent24: the osmiridium is not a whisker. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the osmiridium is isotopic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the osmiridium is a mishap.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the osmiridium is a mishap and it is isotopic is not false.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the flyover is not a Leon is not incorrect.; sent17 -> int4: the flyover is a kind of a Leon and it does rehabilitate dangleberry if it is not impetiginous.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the flyover is a Leon and rehabilitates dangleberry.; int5 -> int6: the flyover is a Leon.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__