the pyroxene is not a graviton.
sent1: that something is indulgent but it is not indelicate does not hold if it is expensive. sent2: the binder is not a kind of a firebreak but it is a consent if the benzodiazepine is not indulgent. sent3: if something does not hand monoblast then it is not a kind of a graviton. sent4: the plughole is particularistic. sent5: the pyroxene is not a knower if that it is fresh and not a graviton does not hold. sent6: the pyroxene is not a knower. sent7: the haustorium does not hand monoblast. sent8: something is not a kind of a graviton if that it does hand monoblast and it is not fresh is incorrect. sent9: something is expensive if it overstrains Kean and is not a kind of a chandlery. sent10: something does overstrain mahuang and it is a kind of a audiogram if it is not a kind of a terrorism. sent11: the glyceryl overstrains Kean and is not a chandlery if the plughole does overstrain mahuang. sent12: if the parquetry is not a knower then that the pyroxene hands monoblast but it is not fresh is false. sent13: if that something does hand monoblast and is not a graviton is not correct it is not a knower. sent14: if the plughole is a kind of particularistic thing that is Bismarckian it is not a terrorism. sent15: that the pyroxene is not a kind of a graviton is right if it does not hand monoblast. sent16: the scad is not prudent if the binder is not a firebreak but it is a consent. sent17: if something does not muff it is a kind of a graviton and it is a kind of a knower. sent18: that the benzodiazepine is not indulgent hold if the fact that the glyceryl is indulgent and is not indelicate is not correct. sent19: the plughole is Bismarckian. sent20: if something is not a knower and not a muff then it is a graviton. sent21: if the fact that something does hand monoblast and is not a knower does not hold it is not a kind of a graviton. sent22: if the parquetry is not fresh then that the pyroxene is a graviton but it is not a knower does not hold. sent23: the parquetry is not a knower.
sent12 & sent23 -> int1: that that the pyroxene does hand monoblast but it is not fresh is not true hold.; sent8 -> int2: the pyroxene is not a kind of a graviton if that it does hand monoblast and it is not fresh is false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the pyroxene is a kind of a graviton.
sent20 -> int3: the pyroxene is a graviton if it is not a kind of a knower and is not a muff.;
$hypothesis$ = the pyroxene is not a graviton. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is indulgent but it is not indelicate does not hold if it is expensive. sent2: the binder is not a kind of a firebreak but it is a consent if the benzodiazepine is not indulgent. sent3: if something does not hand monoblast then it is not a kind of a graviton. sent4: the plughole is particularistic. sent5: the pyroxene is not a knower if that it is fresh and not a graviton does not hold. sent6: the pyroxene is not a knower. sent7: the haustorium does not hand monoblast. sent8: something is not a kind of a graviton if that it does hand monoblast and it is not fresh is incorrect. sent9: something is expensive if it overstrains Kean and is not a kind of a chandlery. sent10: something does overstrain mahuang and it is a kind of a audiogram if it is not a kind of a terrorism. sent11: the glyceryl overstrains Kean and is not a chandlery if the plughole does overstrain mahuang. sent12: if the parquetry is not a knower then that the pyroxene hands monoblast but it is not fresh is false. sent13: if that something does hand monoblast and is not a graviton is not correct it is not a knower. sent14: if the plughole is a kind of particularistic thing that is Bismarckian it is not a terrorism. sent15: that the pyroxene is not a kind of a graviton is right if it does not hand monoblast. sent16: the scad is not prudent if the binder is not a firebreak but it is a consent. sent17: if something does not muff it is a kind of a graviton and it is a kind of a knower. sent18: that the benzodiazepine is not indulgent hold if the fact that the glyceryl is indulgent and is not indelicate is not correct. sent19: the plughole is Bismarckian. sent20: if something is not a knower and not a muff then it is a graviton. sent21: if the fact that something does hand monoblast and is not a knower does not hold it is not a kind of a graviton. sent22: if the parquetry is not fresh then that the pyroxene is a graviton but it is not a knower does not hold. sent23: the parquetry is not a knower. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent23 -> int1: that that the pyroxene does hand monoblast but it is not fresh is not true hold.; sent8 -> int2: the pyroxene is not a kind of a graviton if that it does hand monoblast and it is not fresh is false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__