if the fact that the expiring discernability does not occur and the recursion does not occur is not correct then the face does not occur.
sent1: if the Saturnalia does not occur then the face does not occur. sent2: if the Saturnalia occurs the metamorphicness happens. sent3: that the recursion does not occur is caused by that the occurrence occurs but the updating does not occur. sent4: the occurrence happens and the updating does not occur if the unequivocalness occurs. sent5: that the metamorphicness happens and/or the Levantineness results in that the expiring discernability does not occur. sent6: the unequivocalness happens. sent7: if the Levantine occurs then the metamorphicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Saturnalia happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the metamorphicness happens.; int1 -> int2: the metamorphicness happens and/or the Levantine happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the expiring discernability does not occur.; sent4 & sent6 -> int4: the occurrence occurs but the updating does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the recursion does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the expiring discernability does not occur and the recursion does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the expiring discernability does not occur and the recursion does not occur is false.; int6 & assump2 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Saturnalia does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the face does not occur.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the capacity does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the expiring discernability does not occur and the recursion does not occur is not correct then the face does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Saturnalia does not occur then the face does not occur. sent2: if the Saturnalia occurs the metamorphicness happens. sent3: that the recursion does not occur is caused by that the occurrence occurs but the updating does not occur. sent4: the occurrence happens and the updating does not occur if the unequivocalness occurs. sent5: that the metamorphicness happens and/or the Levantineness results in that the expiring discernability does not occur. sent6: the unequivocalness happens. sent7: if the Levantine occurs then the metamorphicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Saturnalia happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the metamorphicness happens.; int1 -> int2: the metamorphicness happens and/or the Levantine happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the expiring discernability does not occur.; sent4 & sent6 -> int4: the occurrence occurs but the updating does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the recursion does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the expiring discernability does not occur and the recursion does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the expiring discernability does not occur and the recursion does not occur is false.; int6 & assump2 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Saturnalia does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the face does not occur.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__