if the split is smoky then the lantana does not snooze and does not dilapidate intertrigo.
sent1: there is something such that it is not contralateral. sent2: the fact that the busboy is biologistic and/or it is smoky does not hold. sent3: the lantana does not dilapidate intertrigo if the fact that the split does not snooze is not wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it is biologistic then that the auk is both biologistic and a suiting is incorrect. sent5: if the split is smoky the lantana does not dilapidate intertrigo. sent6: the auk is not biologistic but it is a suiting if the busboy is not a suiting. sent7: that the auk is not biologistic but it suits is not right if there exists something such that it is biologistic. sent8: something does not suit if it does not narrate cheetah. sent9: something is a bethel and is a cricket if it does not narrate cheetah. sent10: the overnighter is biologistic if something is not contralateral. sent11: something is not a enation if it does not narrate clouding. sent12: the fact that the auk is biologistic and it does dilapidate intertrigo is false. sent13: the busboy does not narrate cheetah if that the split is not a cricket is right. sent14: if something that is a cricket is smoky that it does not snooze hold. sent15: the lantana does snooze but it does not dilapidate intertrigo if the split is smoky.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the split is not a cricket is not false.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the busboy does not narrate cheetah.; sent8 -> int2: the busboy does not suit if it does not narrate cheetah.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the busboy does not suit.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the auk is both not biologistic and a suiting.; sent1 & sent10 -> int5: the overnighter is biologistic.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is biologistic.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the auk is not biologistic but it is a suiting is wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the split crickets.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the split is smoky is not wrong.; int9 & assump2 -> int10: the split is a cricket that is smoky.; sent14 -> int11: the split does not snooze if that it is a cricket and it is smoky is not incorrect.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the split does not snooze.;
the gunwale is a bethel and it is a kind of a suiting.
sent9 -> int13: if that the gunwale does not narrate cheetah is right then it is a bethel and is a cricket.; sent2 -> int14: there is something such that that it is biologistic or it is smoky or both is false.;
$hypothesis$ = if the split is smoky then the lantana does not snooze and does not dilapidate intertrigo. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not contralateral. sent2: the fact that the busboy is biologistic and/or it is smoky does not hold. sent3: the lantana does not dilapidate intertrigo if the fact that the split does not snooze is not wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it is biologistic then that the auk is both biologistic and a suiting is incorrect. sent5: if the split is smoky the lantana does not dilapidate intertrigo. sent6: the auk is not biologistic but it is a suiting if the busboy is not a suiting. sent7: that the auk is not biologistic but it suits is not right if there exists something such that it is biologistic. sent8: something does not suit if it does not narrate cheetah. sent9: something is a bethel and is a cricket if it does not narrate cheetah. sent10: the overnighter is biologistic if something is not contralateral. sent11: something is not a enation if it does not narrate clouding. sent12: the fact that the auk is biologistic and it does dilapidate intertrigo is false. sent13: the busboy does not narrate cheetah if that the split is not a cricket is right. sent14: if something that is a cricket is smoky that it does not snooze hold. sent15: the lantana does snooze but it does not dilapidate intertrigo if the split is smoky. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the split is not a cricket is not false.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the busboy does not narrate cheetah.; sent8 -> int2: the busboy does not suit if it does not narrate cheetah.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the busboy does not suit.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the auk is both not biologistic and a suiting.; sent1 & sent10 -> int5: the overnighter is biologistic.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is biologistic.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the auk is not biologistic but it is a suiting is wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the split crickets.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the split is smoky is not wrong.; int9 & assump2 -> int10: the split is a cricket that is smoky.; sent14 -> int11: the split does not snooze if that it is a cricket and it is smoky is not incorrect.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the split does not snooze.; __UNKNOWN__