the buckthorn is not an ethology.
sent1: The dentine carjacks bitters. sent2: the buckthorn is not an ethology if the bitters is spermous and a stentor. sent3: the collier is a quoits if there exists something such that it is both an ad and not a commercialization. sent4: if something carjacks dentine then it is not non-spermous. sent5: if there is something such that it is Orthodox then that the Albanian is not Antiguan or is not verbal or both hold. sent6: the fact that something carjacks dentine is not false if it is not a secureness. sent7: if the trivet is not cesarean the fact that it is both an ethology and a tug is not right. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a commercialization. sent9: there exists something such that it is Orthodox. sent10: if something is a secureness then it is a stentor. sent11: the buckthorn is a kind of an ethology if the bitters is a kind of an ethology. sent12: if something is polymorphic but it is not a commercialization then the bitters is a secureness. sent13: the pilaster is mononuclear and it is a secureness. sent14: the bitters carjacks dentine. sent15: that the Manichaean is patriarchal but it is not cesarean is not correct. sent16: if the flyleaf does not carjack dentine then the trivet is a kind of non-spermous thing that is not a stentor. sent17: that the trivet is an eighteen and it is patriarchal does not hold. sent18: the flyleaf does tug if the kanzu is an eighteen. sent19: if that the trivet is a kind of an eighteen and it is patriarchal does not hold then it is not cesarean. sent20: if a cesarean thing is a tug it does not carjack dentine. sent21: if the trivet is non-spermous thing that is not a stentor the bitters is not a kind of a stentor. sent22: there is something such that it is polymorphic and it is not a commercialization. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it is patriarchal and it is not cesarean does not hold the flyleaf is cesarean. sent24: if the buckthorn is spermous it is a dissatisfaction. sent25: if something is not a kind of an ethology the fact that it is not a kind of a stentor and it is spermous does not hold.
sent22 & sent12 -> int1: the bitters is a secureness.; sent10 -> int2: if the bitters is a kind of a secureness it is a kind of a stentor.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the bitters is a stentor hold.; sent4 -> int4: the bitters is spermous if it carjacks dentine.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the bitters is spermous.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the bitters is a kind of spermous thing that is a stentor.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the buckthorn does carjack dentine.
sent6 -> int7: the buckthorn does carjack dentine if it is not a kind of a secureness.; sent25 -> int8: if the bitters is not an ethology the fact that it is not a stentor and it is spermous is wrong.; sent19 & sent17 -> int9: the trivet is not cesarean.; sent7 & int9 -> int10: that the trivet is an ethology that tugs is not correct.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is an ethology and it is a kind of a tug is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the buckthorn is not an ethology. ; $context$ = sent1: The dentine carjacks bitters. sent2: the buckthorn is not an ethology if the bitters is spermous and a stentor. sent3: the collier is a quoits if there exists something such that it is both an ad and not a commercialization. sent4: if something carjacks dentine then it is not non-spermous. sent5: if there is something such that it is Orthodox then that the Albanian is not Antiguan or is not verbal or both hold. sent6: the fact that something carjacks dentine is not false if it is not a secureness. sent7: if the trivet is not cesarean the fact that it is both an ethology and a tug is not right. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a commercialization. sent9: there exists something such that it is Orthodox. sent10: if something is a secureness then it is a stentor. sent11: the buckthorn is a kind of an ethology if the bitters is a kind of an ethology. sent12: if something is polymorphic but it is not a commercialization then the bitters is a secureness. sent13: the pilaster is mononuclear and it is a secureness. sent14: the bitters carjacks dentine. sent15: that the Manichaean is patriarchal but it is not cesarean is not correct. sent16: if the flyleaf does not carjack dentine then the trivet is a kind of non-spermous thing that is not a stentor. sent17: that the trivet is an eighteen and it is patriarchal does not hold. sent18: the flyleaf does tug if the kanzu is an eighteen. sent19: if that the trivet is a kind of an eighteen and it is patriarchal does not hold then it is not cesarean. sent20: if a cesarean thing is a tug it does not carjack dentine. sent21: if the trivet is non-spermous thing that is not a stentor the bitters is not a kind of a stentor. sent22: there is something such that it is polymorphic and it is not a commercialization. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it is patriarchal and it is not cesarean does not hold the flyleaf is cesarean. sent24: if the buckthorn is spermous it is a dissatisfaction. sent25: if something is not a kind of an ethology the fact that it is not a kind of a stentor and it is spermous does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent12 -> int1: the bitters is a secureness.; sent10 -> int2: if the bitters is a kind of a secureness it is a kind of a stentor.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the bitters is a stentor hold.; sent4 -> int4: the bitters is spermous if it carjacks dentine.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the bitters is spermous.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the bitters is a kind of spermous thing that is a stentor.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__