if the fact that the chlamydospore is not a kind of a Malraux hold the bishop is not Kiplingesque.
sent1: if the fact that the bishop is not chemoreceptive is not false it is not Aboriginal. sent2: something is not Kiplingesque if it is not Aboriginal. sent3: if that something is not a Malraux is right then the fact that the fact that it is both a fund and kinesthetic hold is not correct. sent4: if the Ultrasuede is not a toad-in-the-hole the fact that the bishop is chemoreceptive a toad-in-the-hole is incorrect. sent5: if the chlamydospore is not a kind of a Malraux then the fact that it does fund and is not non-kinesthetic is not right. sent6: the Ultrasuede is not a kind of a toad-in-the-hole if the chlamydospore is kinesthetic. sent7: that something is a fund and is not kinesthetic is not true if it is not a Malraux. sent8: if the chlamydospore is not a Malraux the bishop is Kiplingesque. sent9: if the bishop is not Aboriginal it is Kiplingesque. sent10: the Ultrasuede is not a kind of a Malraux. sent11: something that is not a toad-in-the-hole is not incestuous. sent12: if something is not a fund that it colors osteopathy and it does not index integer is incorrect. sent13: that the bishop is Kiplingesque is right. sent14: if the fact that the chlamydospore funds and is not kinesthetic does not hold the Ultrasuede is not a toad-in-the-hole. sent15: that the fact that the chlamydospore is a fund and it is kinesthetic is false is not wrong. sent16: something is not Aboriginal if the fact that it is chemoreceptive and is a toad-in-the-hole does not hold. sent17: something is not Aboriginal if it is non-chemoreceptive.
sent7 -> int1: if the chlamydospore is not a Malraux then that it is a kind of a fund and it is not kinesthetic is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chlamydospore is not a Malraux.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the chlamydospore is both a fund and not kinesthetic is wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Ultrasuede is not a toad-in-the-hole.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the bishop is chemoreceptive thing that is a toad-in-the-hole does not hold.; sent16 -> int5: the bishop is not Aboriginal if the fact that it is chemoreceptive and is a toad-in-the-hole is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bishop is not Aboriginal.; sent2 -> int7: the bishop is not Kiplingesque if it is not Aboriginal.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bishop is not Kiplingesque.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the emmer is not incestuous if it is not a toad-in-the-hole.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the chlamydospore is not a kind of a Malraux hold the bishop is not Kiplingesque. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the bishop is not chemoreceptive is not false it is not Aboriginal. sent2: something is not Kiplingesque if it is not Aboriginal. sent3: if that something is not a Malraux is right then the fact that the fact that it is both a fund and kinesthetic hold is not correct. sent4: if the Ultrasuede is not a toad-in-the-hole the fact that the bishop is chemoreceptive a toad-in-the-hole is incorrect. sent5: if the chlamydospore is not a kind of a Malraux then the fact that it does fund and is not non-kinesthetic is not right. sent6: the Ultrasuede is not a kind of a toad-in-the-hole if the chlamydospore is kinesthetic. sent7: that something is a fund and is not kinesthetic is not true if it is not a Malraux. sent8: if the chlamydospore is not a Malraux the bishop is Kiplingesque. sent9: if the bishop is not Aboriginal it is Kiplingesque. sent10: the Ultrasuede is not a kind of a Malraux. sent11: something that is not a toad-in-the-hole is not incestuous. sent12: if something is not a fund that it colors osteopathy and it does not index integer is incorrect. sent13: that the bishop is Kiplingesque is right. sent14: if the fact that the chlamydospore funds and is not kinesthetic does not hold the Ultrasuede is not a toad-in-the-hole. sent15: that the fact that the chlamydospore is a fund and it is kinesthetic is false is not wrong. sent16: something is not Aboriginal if the fact that it is chemoreceptive and is a toad-in-the-hole does not hold. sent17: something is not Aboriginal if it is non-chemoreceptive. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the chlamydospore is not a Malraux then that it is a kind of a fund and it is not kinesthetic is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chlamydospore is not a Malraux.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the chlamydospore is both a fund and not kinesthetic is wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Ultrasuede is not a toad-in-the-hole.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the bishop is chemoreceptive thing that is a toad-in-the-hole does not hold.; sent16 -> int5: the bishop is not Aboriginal if the fact that it is chemoreceptive and is a toad-in-the-hole is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bishop is not Aboriginal.; sent2 -> int7: the bishop is not Kiplingesque if it is not Aboriginal.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bishop is not Kiplingesque.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__