that the criminologicalness does not occur and the championing elbowing does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the hugging smiler does not occur and the hugging dissolution does not occur is wrong. sent2: both the hypotonicness and the non-adolescentness occurs. sent3: that the reciprocating SIGINT does not occur and the adolescentness does not occur is caused by the non-augiticness. sent4: that the criminologicalness occurs but the championing elbowing does not occur prevents that the reciprocating commercial occurs. sent5: the criminologicalness does not occur if that the snuffling watchtower does not occur and the traipsing happens is not right. sent6: the reorganization does not occur. sent7: the fact that the modeling does not occur and the shoot-'em-up occurs is false. sent8: the reciprocating commercial does not occur if the criminologicalness does not occur and the championing elbowing does not occur. sent9: the ampullarness but not the disreputableness occurs. sent10: the cryptanalyticness happens. sent11: that not the snuffling watchtower but the traipsing happens is wrong. sent12: that both the snuffling superfecundation and the ecoterrorism happens causes that the economy happens. sent13: the hugging carillonneur does not occur. sent14: the technology happens and the toe-in does not occur. sent15: the criminologicalness does not occur. sent16: the perturbation does not occur. sent17: if the hypotonicness does not occur that the emancipation does not occur and the Platonisticness does not occur is not true. sent18: that both the injection and the passing happens prevents that the molarness does not occur. sent19: the touchdown does not occur. sent20: if the phonicsness does not occur and the vigil does not occur the evanescence does not occur. sent21: the hypotonicness occurs. sent22: if the hypotonicness and the non-adolescentness occurs then the reciprocating commercial occurs. sent23: that the championing ease does not occur and the reply does not occur is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the criminologicalness does not occur and the championing elbowing does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the reciprocating commercial does not occur.; sent22 & sent2 -> int2: the reciprocating commercial occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the criminologicalness does not occur and the championing elbowing does not occur.
sent5 & sent11 -> int4: the criminologicalness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the criminologicalness does not occur and the championing elbowing does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hugging smiler does not occur and the hugging dissolution does not occur is wrong. sent2: both the hypotonicness and the non-adolescentness occurs. sent3: that the reciprocating SIGINT does not occur and the adolescentness does not occur is caused by the non-augiticness. sent4: that the criminologicalness occurs but the championing elbowing does not occur prevents that the reciprocating commercial occurs. sent5: the criminologicalness does not occur if that the snuffling watchtower does not occur and the traipsing happens is not right. sent6: the reorganization does not occur. sent7: the fact that the modeling does not occur and the shoot-'em-up occurs is false. sent8: the reciprocating commercial does not occur if the criminologicalness does not occur and the championing elbowing does not occur. sent9: the ampullarness but not the disreputableness occurs. sent10: the cryptanalyticness happens. sent11: that not the snuffling watchtower but the traipsing happens is wrong. sent12: that both the snuffling superfecundation and the ecoterrorism happens causes that the economy happens. sent13: the hugging carillonneur does not occur. sent14: the technology happens and the toe-in does not occur. sent15: the criminologicalness does not occur. sent16: the perturbation does not occur. sent17: if the hypotonicness does not occur that the emancipation does not occur and the Platonisticness does not occur is not true. sent18: that both the injection and the passing happens prevents that the molarness does not occur. sent19: the touchdown does not occur. sent20: if the phonicsness does not occur and the vigil does not occur the evanescence does not occur. sent21: the hypotonicness occurs. sent22: if the hypotonicness and the non-adolescentness occurs then the reciprocating commercial occurs. sent23: that the championing ease does not occur and the reply does not occur is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the criminologicalness does not occur and the championing elbowing does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the reciprocating commercial does not occur.; sent22 & sent2 -> int2: the reciprocating commercial occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__