the pigmenting Argyrol does not occur.
sent1: that the ascertaining plowboy and the countermarching happens is caused by that the reflectorizing disapproval does not occur. sent2: the tuberousness occurs if that both the bay and the unsupportiveness happens does not hold. sent3: the pigmenting perpetuity occurs if the baying but not the supportiveness happens. sent4: if the supportiveness occurs then the tuberousness happens. sent5: the reflectorizing fetch happens if the visiting happens. sent6: if the fact that the tuberousness happens but the connivance does not occur is not true the tuberousness does not occur. sent7: that the supportiveness does not occur hold. sent8: the reflectorizing disapproval does not occur. sent9: that the non-poorness or the connivance or both happens causes that the reflectorizing fetch does not occur. sent10: if the bay and the supportiveness happens then the pigmenting perpetuity occurs. sent11: the visit happens if the fowling peacock occurs. sent12: if the pigmenting perpetuity occurs then the fowling peacock happens. sent13: the fact that the non-poorness and/or the connivance happens is true if the countermarching happens. sent14: that the tuberousness occurs triggers that the pigmenting Argyrol occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bay and the non-supportiveness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the pigmenting perpetuity happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the fowling peacock occurs hold.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the visiting happens.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the reflectorizing fetch happens.; sent1 & sent8 -> int5: the ascertaining plowboy happens and the countermarching occurs.; int5 -> int6: the countermarching happens.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the poorness does not occur and/or the connivance occurs.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the reflectorizing fetch does not occur.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that both the bay and the unsupportiveness happens does not hold.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the tuberousness occurs.; int11 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pigmenting Argyrol does not occur is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the pigmenting Argyrol does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the ascertaining plowboy and the countermarching happens is caused by that the reflectorizing disapproval does not occur. sent2: the tuberousness occurs if that both the bay and the unsupportiveness happens does not hold. sent3: the pigmenting perpetuity occurs if the baying but not the supportiveness happens. sent4: if the supportiveness occurs then the tuberousness happens. sent5: the reflectorizing fetch happens if the visiting happens. sent6: if the fact that the tuberousness happens but the connivance does not occur is not true the tuberousness does not occur. sent7: that the supportiveness does not occur hold. sent8: the reflectorizing disapproval does not occur. sent9: that the non-poorness or the connivance or both happens causes that the reflectorizing fetch does not occur. sent10: if the bay and the supportiveness happens then the pigmenting perpetuity occurs. sent11: the visit happens if the fowling peacock occurs. sent12: if the pigmenting perpetuity occurs then the fowling peacock happens. sent13: the fact that the non-poorness and/or the connivance happens is true if the countermarching happens. sent14: that the tuberousness occurs triggers that the pigmenting Argyrol occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bay and the non-supportiveness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the pigmenting perpetuity happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the fowling peacock occurs hold.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the visiting happens.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the reflectorizing fetch happens.; sent1 & sent8 -> int5: the ascertaining plowboy happens and the countermarching occurs.; int5 -> int6: the countermarching happens.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the poorness does not occur and/or the connivance occurs.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the reflectorizing fetch does not occur.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that both the bay and the unsupportiveness happens does not hold.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the tuberousness occurs.; int11 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__