the fact that there exists something such that if it is pneumonic that it is not pervious and it is a hydrozoan is correct is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it pecks Moulmein then it is not a kind of a ranker and it does tunnel solvent. sent2: there exists something such that if it is pneumonic it is not pervious. sent3: the posthouse is not pneumonic and is a Papuan if it is lathery. sent4: if the easter is pneumonic then it is not pervious. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a friction then it is not a Uzbek and it does peck Powhatan. sent6: there exists something such that if it does tunnel ginkgo it is not ungrateful but a hemstitch. sent7: a friction is not stormy and does deaminate dollarfish. sent8: there is something such that if it is intramural then it is non-barytic thing that is a Reid. sent9: there is something such that if it is lentic it is not a dilation but a Vanderbilt. sent10: the easter is not a kind of a dilation but it is pervious if it is detachable. sent11: there exists something such that if it pecks sweetmeat then it is not a setting and emigrates. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if it does emigrate it is not diamantine but a nonproliferation is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is pneumonic it is pervious and it is a hydrozoan. sent14: there is something such that if it is pneumonic it is a hydrozoan. sent15: the easter is not pervious but it is a hydrozoan if it is pneumonic. sent16: there is something such that if it is a pyxie then it is not a Uzbek and it is a retrenchment. sent17: there is something such that if it is a kind of a bosom it is both not a Bai and a monolingual.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a kind of a friction then it is not stormy and it does deaminate dollarfish.
sent7 -> int1: if that the cuspidation is a friction is not false then it is a kind of non-stormy thing that deaminates dollarfish.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is pneumonic that it is not pervious and it is a hydrozoan is correct is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it pecks Moulmein then it is not a kind of a ranker and it does tunnel solvent. sent2: there exists something such that if it is pneumonic it is not pervious. sent3: the posthouse is not pneumonic and is a Papuan if it is lathery. sent4: if the easter is pneumonic then it is not pervious. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a friction then it is not a Uzbek and it does peck Powhatan. sent6: there exists something such that if it does tunnel ginkgo it is not ungrateful but a hemstitch. sent7: a friction is not stormy and does deaminate dollarfish. sent8: there is something such that if it is intramural then it is non-barytic thing that is a Reid. sent9: there is something such that if it is lentic it is not a dilation but a Vanderbilt. sent10: the easter is not a kind of a dilation but it is pervious if it is detachable. sent11: there exists something such that if it pecks sweetmeat then it is not a setting and emigrates. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if it does emigrate it is not diamantine but a nonproliferation is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is pneumonic it is pervious and it is a hydrozoan. sent14: there is something such that if it is pneumonic it is a hydrozoan. sent15: the easter is not pervious but it is a hydrozoan if it is pneumonic. sent16: there is something such that if it is a pyxie then it is not a Uzbek and it is a retrenchment. sent17: there is something such that if it is a kind of a bosom it is both not a Bai and a monolingual. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__