the xylene is passable and is a amniote.
sent1: the cork is not a kind of a amniote. sent2: the baggageman is anthropic. sent3: if there is something such that it is carcinogenic that the xylene is non-passable thing that is a revenant does not hold. sent4: if the baggageman is not passable then the fact that the xylene is both passable and a amniote is false. sent5: the sender is carcinogenic. sent6: if the fact that something is not passable but it is a kind of a revenant does not hold it is passable. sent7: the baggageman is not passable but it is anthropic. sent8: if something is anthropic that it is passable and is not a amniote is wrong.
sent7 -> int1: the baggageman is not passable.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the xylene is passable and is a amniote.
sent6 -> int2: the xylene is passable if the fact that it is passable a revenant is incorrect.; sent5 -> int3: something is not non-carcinogenic.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the xylene is not passable but it is a revenant is not true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the xylene is passable.;
$hypothesis$ = the xylene is passable and is a amniote. ; $context$ = sent1: the cork is not a kind of a amniote. sent2: the baggageman is anthropic. sent3: if there is something such that it is carcinogenic that the xylene is non-passable thing that is a revenant does not hold. sent4: if the baggageman is not passable then the fact that the xylene is both passable and a amniote is false. sent5: the sender is carcinogenic. sent6: if the fact that something is not passable but it is a kind of a revenant does not hold it is passable. sent7: the baggageman is not passable but it is anthropic. sent8: if something is anthropic that it is passable and is not a amniote is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the baggageman is not passable.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__