there exists something such that if it is relevant then it is an epidemiology.
sent1: if the flirt is audible but not inclusive then it is a Venice. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of relevant thing that does not vex pierid is false it does vex pierid. sent3: the flirt is not inclusive. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a butanone then the fact that it is hydrous is not false. sent5: there is something such that it is a kind of a telescope. sent6: the flirt is a kind of an epidemiology if it is a Venice. sent7: something is a kind of a Venice and is an epidemiology if it is not a mermaid. sent8: if the flirt is an audible and it is not non-inclusive then it is a kind of a Venice. sent9: the flirt is not inclusive if it is relevant.
the flirt does vex pierid.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the flirt is a kind of relevant thing that does not vex pierid is not correct the fact that it vex pierid is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int2: the honeycreeper is a Venice and it is a kind of an epidemiology if the fact that it is not a mermaid hold.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is relevant then it is an epidemiology. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flirt is audible but not inclusive then it is a Venice. sent2: if the fact that something is a kind of relevant thing that does not vex pierid is false it does vex pierid. sent3: the flirt is not inclusive. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a butanone then the fact that it is hydrous is not false. sent5: there is something such that it is a kind of a telescope. sent6: the flirt is a kind of an epidemiology if it is a Venice. sent7: something is a kind of a Venice and is an epidemiology if it is not a mermaid. sent8: if the flirt is an audible and it is not non-inclusive then it is a kind of a Venice. sent9: the flirt is not inclusive if it is relevant. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__