if the sourwood does like then the filer is vaginal.
sent1: if something does like it is vaginal. sent2: something is not incomparable and it is not a kind of a monotreme if it erases gidgee. sent3: if the sourwood is a liking the fact that it is not nasopharyngeal is not false. sent4: if something does like then it is not nasopharyngeal and it is not cambial. sent5: if something is both comparable and not a monotreme then it likes. sent6: the fact that the caspase does erase bottomed is right if it is not Wittgensteinian and is a Romanticism. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not non-nasopharyngeal but non-cambial then the filer is vaginal. sent8: something that does erase bottomed is not a sickbay and is palatoglossal. sent9: the sourwood is not nasopharyngeal. sent10: there exists something such that it is not nasopharyngeal. sent11: if something that is not a sickbay is palatoglossal then it erases gidgee. sent12: the filer is dioecious. sent13: the filer is nasopharyngeal. sent14: the filer is vaginal if there exists something such that it is not nasopharyngeal and it is not cambial.
sent4 -> int1: the sourwood is not nasopharyngeal and it is not cambial if it is a liking.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sourwood is liking.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sourwood is a kind of non-nasopharyngeal thing that is not cambial.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not nasopharyngeal and it is not cambial.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the filer is vaginal.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the caspase is vaginal hold.
sent1 -> int5: the caspase is vaginal if it likes.; sent5 -> int6: if the caspase is not incomparable and it is not a kind of a monotreme it is a kind of a liking.; sent2 -> int7: if the caspase erases gidgee it is not incomparable and it is not a monotreme.; sent11 -> int8: if the caspase is both not a sickbay and palatoglossal that it erases gidgee is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int9: the caspase is not a sickbay but palatoglossal if it does erase bottomed.;
$hypothesis$ = if the sourwood does like then the filer is vaginal. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does like it is vaginal. sent2: something is not incomparable and it is not a kind of a monotreme if it erases gidgee. sent3: if the sourwood is a liking the fact that it is not nasopharyngeal is not false. sent4: if something does like then it is not nasopharyngeal and it is not cambial. sent5: if something is both comparable and not a monotreme then it likes. sent6: the fact that the caspase does erase bottomed is right if it is not Wittgensteinian and is a Romanticism. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not non-nasopharyngeal but non-cambial then the filer is vaginal. sent8: something that does erase bottomed is not a sickbay and is palatoglossal. sent9: the sourwood is not nasopharyngeal. sent10: there exists something such that it is not nasopharyngeal. sent11: if something that is not a sickbay is palatoglossal then it erases gidgee. sent12: the filer is dioecious. sent13: the filer is nasopharyngeal. sent14: the filer is vaginal if there exists something such that it is not nasopharyngeal and it is not cambial. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the sourwood is not nasopharyngeal and it is not cambial if it is a liking.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sourwood is liking.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sourwood is a kind of non-nasopharyngeal thing that is not cambial.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not nasopharyngeal and it is not cambial.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the filer is vaginal.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__