the fugalness happens.
sent1: the entailing Wollstonecraft happens and the angling happens. sent2: that the thermostaticsness occurs is prevented by that both the fugalness and the entailing Wollstonecraft happens. sent3: the custom occurs. sent4: that the custom occurs results in that the thermostaticsness happens.
sent1 -> int1: the entailing Wollstonecraft happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fugalness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fugalness and the entailing Wollstonecraft happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the thermostaticsness does not occur.; sent4 & sent3 -> int4: that the thermostaticsness occurs hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fugalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the entailing Wollstonecraft happens and the angling happens. sent2: that the thermostaticsness occurs is prevented by that both the fugalness and the entailing Wollstonecraft happens. sent3: the custom occurs. sent4: that the custom occurs results in that the thermostaticsness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the entailing Wollstonecraft happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fugalness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fugalness and the entailing Wollstonecraft happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the thermostaticsness does not occur.; sent4 & sent3 -> int4: that the thermostaticsness occurs hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__