the fact that the forequarter does telecast if that the radiocarbon is not a Seriola and is not unseasonable is incorrect is not right.
sent1: that the fowl is not a Seriola but it is a beaming is false if the radiocarbon is not a Seriola. sent2: if the fact that the radiocarbon is a Seriola but it is not unseasonable is wrong then the forequarter telecasts. sent3: the forequarter telecasts if the fowl is Catholic. sent4: that the fowl is not a expunction but it is inhospitable is not true. sent5: that the fowl is both not a falcon and Catholic is not right. sent6: if that the radiocarbon is a kind of a Seriola that is not unseasonable is not right it is not a falcon. sent7: the fact that the fowl is a kind of Catholic thing that is a beaming is wrong. sent8: if the fact that the plastron is a Seriola and is not a falcon is false the radiocarbon staples acme. sent9: if the fact that something is not a telecast and it is not a falcon is not right then it is not unseasonable. sent10: the lookdown is not Catholic if that the plastron is not a falcon and does not staple acme is not correct. sent11: if the fact that the forequarter does not telecast and is not a kind of a falcon is incorrect the fact that the radiocarbon is not a beaming is right. sent12: the radiocarbon does not falcon if it is not a kind of a Seriola and it is not unseasonable. sent13: that the radiocarbon is not a grantee is true. sent14: the fact that the fact that the fowl is not a Catholic and beams is not incorrect does not hold if the lookdown is not a Catholic. sent15: if the radiocarbon does not falcon the fact that the plastron is a falcon but it does not staple acme is not correct. sent16: if that the fowl is a kind of non-Catholic thing that is a kind of a beaming does not hold then the forequarter telecasts. sent17: if the fact that something is not a Seriola and it is not unseasonable is not correct it is not a falcon. sent18: if the radiocarbon is unseasonable then it is not a falcon. sent19: something is not a falcon if it is not a Seriola and it is not unseasonable. sent20: the lookdown is not a kind of a Catholic if the plastron does falcon. sent21: if the radiocarbon is not a kind of a Seriola and it is not unseasonable then the forequarter does telecast. sent22: the fact that the plastron is a falcon but it does not staple acme does not hold. sent23: that the radiocarbon is not a kind of a Seriola and is unseasonable does not hold. sent24: the fact that the plastron is not a kind of a falcon and it does not staple acme is false if the radiocarbon is not a falcon. sent25: the fact that the radiocarbon is a falcon but it does not staple acme does not hold.
sent17 -> int1: the radiocarbon is not a falcon if that it is not a kind of a Seriola and it is not unseasonable is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the radiocarbon is not a Seriola and is not unseasonable is not right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the radiocarbon is not a kind of a falcon.; sent24 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the plastron is not a kind of a falcon and does not staple acme is not true.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the lookdown is not Catholic.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fowl is a kind of non-Catholic thing that does beam does not hold.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the forequarter telecasts.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the forequarter does telecast if that the radiocarbon is not a Seriola and is not unseasonable is incorrect is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fowl is not a Seriola but it is a beaming is false if the radiocarbon is not a Seriola. sent2: if the fact that the radiocarbon is a Seriola but it is not unseasonable is wrong then the forequarter telecasts. sent3: the forequarter telecasts if the fowl is Catholic. sent4: that the fowl is not a expunction but it is inhospitable is not true. sent5: that the fowl is both not a falcon and Catholic is not right. sent6: if that the radiocarbon is a kind of a Seriola that is not unseasonable is not right it is not a falcon. sent7: the fact that the fowl is a kind of Catholic thing that is a beaming is wrong. sent8: if the fact that the plastron is a Seriola and is not a falcon is false the radiocarbon staples acme. sent9: if the fact that something is not a telecast and it is not a falcon is not right then it is not unseasonable. sent10: the lookdown is not Catholic if that the plastron is not a falcon and does not staple acme is not correct. sent11: if the fact that the forequarter does not telecast and is not a kind of a falcon is incorrect the fact that the radiocarbon is not a beaming is right. sent12: the radiocarbon does not falcon if it is not a kind of a Seriola and it is not unseasonable. sent13: that the radiocarbon is not a grantee is true. sent14: the fact that the fact that the fowl is not a Catholic and beams is not incorrect does not hold if the lookdown is not a Catholic. sent15: if the radiocarbon does not falcon the fact that the plastron is a falcon but it does not staple acme is not correct. sent16: if that the fowl is a kind of non-Catholic thing that is a kind of a beaming does not hold then the forequarter telecasts. sent17: if the fact that something is not a Seriola and it is not unseasonable is not correct it is not a falcon. sent18: if the radiocarbon is unseasonable then it is not a falcon. sent19: something is not a falcon if it is not a Seriola and it is not unseasonable. sent20: the lookdown is not a kind of a Catholic if the plastron does falcon. sent21: if the radiocarbon is not a kind of a Seriola and it is not unseasonable then the forequarter does telecast. sent22: the fact that the plastron is a falcon but it does not staple acme does not hold. sent23: that the radiocarbon is not a kind of a Seriola and is unseasonable does not hold. sent24: the fact that the plastron is not a kind of a falcon and it does not staple acme is false if the radiocarbon is not a falcon. sent25: the fact that the radiocarbon is a falcon but it does not staple acme does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the radiocarbon is not a falcon if that it is not a kind of a Seriola and it is not unseasonable is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the radiocarbon is not a Seriola and is not unseasonable is not right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the radiocarbon is not a kind of a falcon.; sent24 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the plastron is not a kind of a falcon and does not staple acme is not true.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the lookdown is not Catholic.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fowl is a kind of non-Catholic thing that does beam does not hold.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the forequarter telecasts.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__