the mummifying Regulus happens.
sent1: if the fuse occurs then that the unalterableness happens and the burial does not occur is false. sent2: the photoelectricness does not occur. sent3: that the wheellessness does not occur and the noselessness happens is brought about by the non-Lancastrianness. sent4: that the jab does not occur and the noselessness does not occur is not right if the lexicography does not occur. sent5: that the mummifying Regulus occurs prevents that the negativeness does not occur. sent6: the chronicness occurs. sent7: the fusing does not occur if the negative or the unalterableness or both occurs. sent8: the Lancastrian does not occur if the rolling oblation occurs and the mercantileness happens. sent9: the wheellessness does not occur. sent10: the lexicography happens. sent11: if the fuse does not occur then the burial does not occur. sent12: that the jab does not occur is prevented by that the burial does not occur. sent13: the fact that the jabbing does not occur is right if the lexicography happens and the noselessness happens. sent14: the Hmong does not occur. sent15: not the rolling economist but the chaffiness happens if that the Jacobinicness does not occur hold. sent16: both the rolling oblation and the mercantileness happens. sent17: that the wheellessness happens causes that the lexicography does not occur. sent18: the fusing does not occur if the unalterableness happens. sent19: if the noselessness does not occur that the jabbing does not occur and the burial does not occur is not true. sent20: the outburst occurs. sent21: if that the unalterableness but not the burial occurs does not hold that the unalterableness happens does not hold. sent22: the chaffiness occurs. sent23: the mummifying ringside is brought about by that the sinistralness happens. sent24: the rolling oblation occurs. sent25: either the proximateness or that the damping matchboard happens or both causes that the biologicalness does not occur. sent26: that the Lancastrian does not occur prevents that the wheellessness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mummifying Regulus occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the negative occurs.; int1 -> int2: the negative happens or the unalterableness occurs or both.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fuse does not occur.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the burial does not occur.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the jab occurs.; sent8 & sent16 -> int6: the Lancastrianness does not occur.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the wheellessness does not occur and the noselessness happens.; int7 -> int8: that the noselessness happens hold.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the lexicography happens and the noselessness happens.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the jab does not occur.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the mummifying Regulus happens.
$hypothesis$ = the mummifying Regulus happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fuse occurs then that the unalterableness happens and the burial does not occur is false. sent2: the photoelectricness does not occur. sent3: that the wheellessness does not occur and the noselessness happens is brought about by the non-Lancastrianness. sent4: that the jab does not occur and the noselessness does not occur is not right if the lexicography does not occur. sent5: that the mummifying Regulus occurs prevents that the negativeness does not occur. sent6: the chronicness occurs. sent7: the fusing does not occur if the negative or the unalterableness or both occurs. sent8: the Lancastrian does not occur if the rolling oblation occurs and the mercantileness happens. sent9: the wheellessness does not occur. sent10: the lexicography happens. sent11: if the fuse does not occur then the burial does not occur. sent12: that the jab does not occur is prevented by that the burial does not occur. sent13: the fact that the jabbing does not occur is right if the lexicography happens and the noselessness happens. sent14: the Hmong does not occur. sent15: not the rolling economist but the chaffiness happens if that the Jacobinicness does not occur hold. sent16: both the rolling oblation and the mercantileness happens. sent17: that the wheellessness happens causes that the lexicography does not occur. sent18: the fusing does not occur if the unalterableness happens. sent19: if the noselessness does not occur that the jabbing does not occur and the burial does not occur is not true. sent20: the outburst occurs. sent21: if that the unalterableness but not the burial occurs does not hold that the unalterableness happens does not hold. sent22: the chaffiness occurs. sent23: the mummifying ringside is brought about by that the sinistralness happens. sent24: the rolling oblation occurs. sent25: either the proximateness or that the damping matchboard happens or both causes that the biologicalness does not occur. sent26: that the Lancastrian does not occur prevents that the wheellessness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mummifying Regulus occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the negative occurs.; int1 -> int2: the negative happens or the unalterableness occurs or both.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fuse does not occur.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the burial does not occur.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the jab occurs.; sent8 & sent16 -> int6: the Lancastrianness does not occur.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the wheellessness does not occur and the noselessness happens.; int7 -> int8: that the noselessness happens hold.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the lexicography happens and the noselessness happens.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the jab does not occur.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__