if the fashion is a much either the naltrexone does not vamp or it is an epilepsy or both.
sent1: either the naltrexone vamps or it is an epilepsy or both. sent2: something is not a vamp and/or is a kind of an epilepsy if it is not a feline. sent3: if the fashion is not a smut then it is a snowflake. sent4: if the fashion is not a vicariate it is a digitigrade and it is not a much. sent5: something that is not a smut is papery and is a snowflake. sent6: the fashion is a snowflake. sent7: the nympholept is papery and it is ataxic. sent8: the fashion is a digitigrade and is much if it is not a vicariate. sent9: the naltrexone is not extropic. sent10: if that the fashion is not feline is not false it is digitigrade thing that is an epilepsy. sent11: the naltrexone is either a vamp or an epilepsy or both if the fact that it is non-feline is right. sent12: if something is not a smut it is a kind of a snowflake. sent13: the booklet does not jack Astreus if that it is ataxic and it vamps is not true. sent14: the naltrexone either is a vamp or is an epilepsy or both if the fashion is a kind of a much. sent15: the fact that the fashion is extropic thing that is a Ichthyosauria is not right. sent16: the fashion is digitigrade. sent17: the naltrexone is not a digitigrade. sent18: the fashion does not smut if that it is extropic and it is a Ichthyosauria is false. sent19: if the naltrexone is not an epilepsy then that it is a vamp and it is not a smut hold. sent20: if something is not feline then either it is a vamp or it is an epilepsy or both. sent21: the fashion is not a smut if it is not extropic. sent22: the naltrexone is not feline if the fashion is papery and it is a vicariate. sent23: if the naltrexone is digitigrade thing that is a vamp then the fashion is not an epilepsy.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fashion is not a kind of a vicariate.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the fashion is digitigrade but it is not a much.; int1 -> int2: the fashion is not a kind of a much.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fashion is a much.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fashion is a vicariate.; sent5 -> int5: if the fashion is not a smut it is papery a snowflake.; sent18 & sent15 -> int6: the fashion is not a kind of a smut.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fashion is papery and it is a snowflake.; int7 -> int8: the fashion is papery.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the fashion is a kind of papery a vicariate.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the naltrexone is not feline.; sent2 -> int11: the naltrexone does not vamp and/or it is an epilepsy if it is not a kind of a feline.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the naltrexone is not a kind of a vamp and/or it is an epilepsy.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fashion is a much either the naltrexone does not vamp or it is an epilepsy or both. ; $context$ = sent1: either the naltrexone vamps or it is an epilepsy or both. sent2: something is not a vamp and/or is a kind of an epilepsy if it is not a feline. sent3: if the fashion is not a smut then it is a snowflake. sent4: if the fashion is not a vicariate it is a digitigrade and it is not a much. sent5: something that is not a smut is papery and is a snowflake. sent6: the fashion is a snowflake. sent7: the nympholept is papery and it is ataxic. sent8: the fashion is a digitigrade and is much if it is not a vicariate. sent9: the naltrexone is not extropic. sent10: if that the fashion is not feline is not false it is digitigrade thing that is an epilepsy. sent11: the naltrexone is either a vamp or an epilepsy or both if the fact that it is non-feline is right. sent12: if something is not a smut it is a kind of a snowflake. sent13: the booklet does not jack Astreus if that it is ataxic and it vamps is not true. sent14: the naltrexone either is a vamp or is an epilepsy or both if the fashion is a kind of a much. sent15: the fact that the fashion is extropic thing that is a Ichthyosauria is not right. sent16: the fashion is digitigrade. sent17: the naltrexone is not a digitigrade. sent18: the fashion does not smut if that it is extropic and it is a Ichthyosauria is false. sent19: if the naltrexone is not an epilepsy then that it is a vamp and it is not a smut hold. sent20: if something is not feline then either it is a vamp or it is an epilepsy or both. sent21: the fashion is not a smut if it is not extropic. sent22: the naltrexone is not feline if the fashion is papery and it is a vicariate. sent23: if the naltrexone is digitigrade thing that is a vamp then the fashion is not an epilepsy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fashion is not a kind of a vicariate.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the fashion is digitigrade but it is not a much.; int1 -> int2: the fashion is not a kind of a much.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fashion is a much.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fashion is a vicariate.; sent5 -> int5: if the fashion is not a smut it is papery a snowflake.; sent18 & sent15 -> int6: the fashion is not a kind of a smut.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fashion is papery and it is a snowflake.; int7 -> int8: the fashion is papery.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the fashion is a kind of papery a vicariate.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the naltrexone is not feline.; sent2 -> int11: the naltrexone does not vamp and/or it is an epilepsy if it is not a kind of a feline.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the naltrexone is not a kind of a vamp and/or it is an epilepsy.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__