the baby is aplitic.
sent1: the shag does not reimburse unknowingness. sent2: if the fact that something is not a stall or not parochial or both is not correct it is a Apollinaire. sent3: The unknowingness does not reimburse shag. sent4: the shag is a Apollinaire if the fact that either it is not a stall or it is parochial or both is false. sent5: if the fact that something stalls or it is not parochial or both does not hold it is a Apollinaire. sent6: if the shag does not reimburse unknowingness then the fact that it is not a stall or is not parochial or both does not hold. sent7: the baby is aplitic if the shag is a Apollinaire.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the shag is not a stall or not parochial or both does not hold then it is a kind of a Apollinaire.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: that the shag is not a stall and/or is not parochial is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shag is a kind of a Apollinaire.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the baby is aplitic. ; $context$ = sent1: the shag does not reimburse unknowingness. sent2: if the fact that something is not a stall or not parochial or both is not correct it is a Apollinaire. sent3: The unknowingness does not reimburse shag. sent4: the shag is a Apollinaire if the fact that either it is not a stall or it is parochial or both is false. sent5: if the fact that something stalls or it is not parochial or both does not hold it is a Apollinaire. sent6: if the shag does not reimburse unknowingness then the fact that it is not a stall or is not parochial or both does not hold. sent7: the baby is aplitic if the shag is a Apollinaire. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the shag is not a stall or not parochial or both does not hold then it is a kind of a Apollinaire.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: that the shag is not a stall and/or is not parochial is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shag is a kind of a Apollinaire.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__