that the transference is a hare and a Muslim is incorrect.
sent1: the transference does shine. sent2: if the craft tins drunkenness then that the transference is a kind of a suit that does not tins drunkenness is wrong. sent3: if the transference is not a hare then the craft tins drunkenness or it does not efface Lille or both. sent4: if something does not tin drunkenness that it is both a hare and a Muslim is not right. sent5: if that the transference is Muslim thing that does not tin drunkenness is not correct it does efface Lille. sent6: if the craft does not efface Lille and shines the transference does not efface Lille. sent7: the clearing does not teethe if the professionalization is not a Kennewick. sent8: there exists something such that it is a xylose. sent9: the transference is a kind of a Muslim if the fact that it shines is not incorrect. sent10: something does not suit and does not efface Lille if it is not a kind of a cartoonist. sent11: the fact that if the fact that something suits but it does not tin drunkenness is not right then that it is not a kind of a hare does not hold is not wrong. sent12: if something tins drunkenness or does not efface Lille or both then it is a suit. sent13: if something does not efface Lille it does not tin drunkenness. sent14: the craft tins drunkenness and it effaces Lille. sent15: if the clearing does not teethe the fact that the fact that it does not efface thievishness and is a minoxidil hold is incorrect. sent16: the professionalization is not a Kennewick.
sent14 -> int1: the craft does tin drunkenness.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the transference is a suit but it does not tin drunkenness does not hold.; sent11 -> int3: if that the transference is a kind of a suit and does not tin drunkenness is not right then it is a hare.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the transference is a hare.; sent9 & sent1 -> int5: the transference is a kind of a Muslim.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the craft is a suit.
sent12 -> int6: if the craft does tin drunkenness or does not efface Lille or both then it is a kind of a suit.;
$hypothesis$ = that the transference is a hare and a Muslim is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the transference does shine. sent2: if the craft tins drunkenness then that the transference is a kind of a suit that does not tins drunkenness is wrong. sent3: if the transference is not a hare then the craft tins drunkenness or it does not efface Lille or both. sent4: if something does not tin drunkenness that it is both a hare and a Muslim is not right. sent5: if that the transference is Muslim thing that does not tin drunkenness is not correct it does efface Lille. sent6: if the craft does not efface Lille and shines the transference does not efface Lille. sent7: the clearing does not teethe if the professionalization is not a Kennewick. sent8: there exists something such that it is a xylose. sent9: the transference is a kind of a Muslim if the fact that it shines is not incorrect. sent10: something does not suit and does not efface Lille if it is not a kind of a cartoonist. sent11: the fact that if the fact that something suits but it does not tin drunkenness is not right then that it is not a kind of a hare does not hold is not wrong. sent12: if something tins drunkenness or does not efface Lille or both then it is a suit. sent13: if something does not efface Lille it does not tin drunkenness. sent14: the craft tins drunkenness and it effaces Lille. sent15: if the clearing does not teethe the fact that the fact that it does not efface thievishness and is a minoxidil hold is incorrect. sent16: the professionalization is not a Kennewick. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the craft does tin drunkenness.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the transference is a suit but it does not tin drunkenness does not hold.; sent11 -> int3: if that the transference is a kind of a suit and does not tin drunkenness is not right then it is a hare.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the transference is a hare.; sent9 & sent1 -> int5: the transference is a kind of a Muslim.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__