the jawfish is participial.
sent1: the possumwood is non-invertible. sent2: there is nothing that is an aesthetic but not a pelisse. sent3: that something is not a airgun and it does not preoccupy foregrounding does not hold if it is a Melopsittacus. sent4: if something is not an aesthetic that it is a kind of Vedic thing that does mark lithosphere is false. sent5: if the outfitter is a verticality the monarchist is a kind of a pelisse. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a airgun and preoccupies foregrounding is not right. sent7: that something is not participial and it is not a Melopsittacus is not true if it is a airgun. sent8: if the fact that that something is aesthetic but it is not a pelisse is right is incorrect it is not an aesthetic. sent9: the Segway is not an aesthetic if that the monarchist is an aesthetic but not Vedic is wrong. sent10: something does mark mirror if it is a kind of a Melopsittacus. sent11: the preserve is ethereal. sent12: the jawfish is participial if there exists something such that it is a airgun. sent13: if something is aecial then that it is an aesthetic and it is not Vedic is not true. sent14: something is aecial if it is a pelisse. sent15: if the outfitter is not a Maputo but it is a kind of a Sempatch then it is a kind of a verticality. sent16: if there is something such that that it is not a airgun and does not preoccupy foregrounding is incorrect then the jawfish is participial. sent17: the outfitter is not a Maputo and is a Sempatch if the preserve is ethereal. sent18: the Pan is a Melopsittacus.
sent3 -> int1: if the Pan is a kind of a Melopsittacus then the fact that it is not a airgun and it does not preoccupy foregrounding is not correct.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: that that the Pan is not a kind of a airgun and does not preoccupy foregrounding is false is correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a airgun and does not preoccupy foregrounding is false.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the nominalist marks mirror.
sent10 -> int4: the nominalist does mark mirror if it is a kind of a Melopsittacus.; sent4 -> int5: if the jawfish is not an aesthetic then the fact that it is Vedic and it does mark lithosphere is not correct.; sent8 -> int6: if the fact that the jawfish is an aesthetic that is not a pelisse is incorrect it is not an aesthetic.; sent2 -> int7: that the jawfish is a kind of aesthetic thing that is not a kind of a pelisse does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the jawfish is not aesthetic.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the jawfish is Vedic and it does mark lithosphere is false.; int9 -> int10: there exists nothing such that the fact that it is Vedic and it marks lithosphere is correct.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the nominalist is Vedic and it does mark lithosphere is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the jawfish is participial. ; $context$ = sent1: the possumwood is non-invertible. sent2: there is nothing that is an aesthetic but not a pelisse. sent3: that something is not a airgun and it does not preoccupy foregrounding does not hold if it is a Melopsittacus. sent4: if something is not an aesthetic that it is a kind of Vedic thing that does mark lithosphere is false. sent5: if the outfitter is a verticality the monarchist is a kind of a pelisse. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a airgun and preoccupies foregrounding is not right. sent7: that something is not participial and it is not a Melopsittacus is not true if it is a airgun. sent8: if the fact that that something is aesthetic but it is not a pelisse is right is incorrect it is not an aesthetic. sent9: the Segway is not an aesthetic if that the monarchist is an aesthetic but not Vedic is wrong. sent10: something does mark mirror if it is a kind of a Melopsittacus. sent11: the preserve is ethereal. sent12: the jawfish is participial if there exists something such that it is a airgun. sent13: if something is aecial then that it is an aesthetic and it is not Vedic is not true. sent14: something is aecial if it is a pelisse. sent15: if the outfitter is not a Maputo but it is a kind of a Sempatch then it is a kind of a verticality. sent16: if there is something such that that it is not a airgun and does not preoccupy foregrounding is incorrect then the jawfish is participial. sent17: the outfitter is not a Maputo and is a Sempatch if the preserve is ethereal. sent18: the Pan is a Melopsittacus. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the Pan is a kind of a Melopsittacus then the fact that it is not a airgun and it does not preoccupy foregrounding is not correct.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: that that the Pan is not a kind of a airgun and does not preoccupy foregrounding is false is correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a airgun and does not preoccupy foregrounding is false.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__