something is not a misfire and it does not drink uranoplasty.
sent1: if the fact that something is monocarpic and warms Spalacidae hold then the kingbird is not a misfire. sent2: something is a misfire if it does warm Spalacidae. sent3: something does warm Decius and is not monocarpic if it does not drink uranoplasty. sent4: there is something such that it is both not amoristic and not technophobic. sent5: something does yacht but it does not drink uranoplasty if it is a kind of a calmness. sent6: there exists something such that it does not know. sent7: the cerivastatin is monocarpic and warms Spalacidae. sent8: that something is not a misfire and drinks uranoplasty is correct. sent9: the fact that the Gray warms Spalacidae is not wrong. sent10: something is monocarpic. sent11: that the kingbird does not drink uranoplasty hold. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a GAD and it does veneer. sent13: something is an illiteracy and is a tendency. sent14: the hold does not drink uranoplasty. sent15: that the buttonhook does not warm Spalacidae is not incorrect. sent16: That the uranoplasty does not drink kingbird hold.
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that it is monocarpic and it does warm Spalacidae.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the kingbird does not misfire.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the kingbird does not misfire and it does not drink uranoplasty.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the Gray is a kind of a misfire and does warm Decius.
sent2 -> int4: the Gray does misfire if it warms Spalacidae.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the Gray misfires.; sent3 -> int6: the Gray does warm Decius and is not monocarpic if it does not drink uranoplasty.; sent5 -> int7: if the Gray is a kind of a calmness it is a yacht and it does not drink uranoplasty.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not a misfire and it does not drink uranoplasty. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is monocarpic and warms Spalacidae hold then the kingbird is not a misfire. sent2: something is a misfire if it does warm Spalacidae. sent3: something does warm Decius and is not monocarpic if it does not drink uranoplasty. sent4: there is something such that it is both not amoristic and not technophobic. sent5: something does yacht but it does not drink uranoplasty if it is a kind of a calmness. sent6: there exists something such that it does not know. sent7: the cerivastatin is monocarpic and warms Spalacidae. sent8: that something is not a misfire and drinks uranoplasty is correct. sent9: the fact that the Gray warms Spalacidae is not wrong. sent10: something is monocarpic. sent11: that the kingbird does not drink uranoplasty hold. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a GAD and it does veneer. sent13: something is an illiteracy and is a tendency. sent14: the hold does not drink uranoplasty. sent15: that the buttonhook does not warm Spalacidae is not incorrect. sent16: That the uranoplasty does not drink kingbird hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that it is monocarpic and it does warm Spalacidae.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the kingbird does not misfire.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the kingbird does not misfire and it does not drink uranoplasty.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__