the reinforcing pharma occurs.
sent1: the aleuronicness occurs. sent2: that the reinforcing pharma happens is prevented by that the unbosoming does not occur. sent3: that the therapeuticsness occurs is correct if the reinforcing Parliamentarian occurs. sent4: the diachronicness does not occur if that the summoning and/or the idolatry occurs is incorrect. sent5: the ectodermalness is prevented by that the representativeness and the unbosoming occurs. sent6: that the jet does not occur leads to that both the reinforcing pharma and the fattism occurs. sent7: that the jet occurs is prevented by that the literature does not occur and the diachronicness does not occur. sent8: that not the unbosoming but the ectodermalness occurs is false if the fattism happens. sent9: the ectodermalness occurs. sent10: that the aleuronicness occurs results in that the representativeness occurs. sent11: the timidness does not occur. sent12: the literature does not occur.
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the representativeness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unbosoming occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the representativeness and the unbosoming happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the ectodermalness does not occur.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the unbosoming does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the reinforcing pharma happens.
$hypothesis$ = the reinforcing pharma occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the aleuronicness occurs. sent2: that the reinforcing pharma happens is prevented by that the unbosoming does not occur. sent3: that the therapeuticsness occurs is correct if the reinforcing Parliamentarian occurs. sent4: the diachronicness does not occur if that the summoning and/or the idolatry occurs is incorrect. sent5: the ectodermalness is prevented by that the representativeness and the unbosoming occurs. sent6: that the jet does not occur leads to that both the reinforcing pharma and the fattism occurs. sent7: that the jet occurs is prevented by that the literature does not occur and the diachronicness does not occur. sent8: that not the unbosoming but the ectodermalness occurs is false if the fattism happens. sent9: the ectodermalness occurs. sent10: that the aleuronicness occurs results in that the representativeness occurs. sent11: the timidness does not occur. sent12: the literature does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the representativeness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unbosoming occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the representativeness and the unbosoming happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the ectodermalness does not occur.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the unbosoming does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__