the stunt does not mythologize Ismailism.
sent1: the fact that the stunt is wintry and it fleshes cross-examination does not hold. sent2: if something fleshes cross-examination it does mythologize Ismailism. sent3: if that something is wintry but it does not flesh cross-examination does not hold it mythologizes Ismailism. sent4: if something does not mythologize sweetsop then that it is not icterogenic and it is a twilight does not hold. sent5: the foolscap does not mythologize sweetsop if the radar fleshes treasurer but it does not mythologize sweetsop. sent6: if something is not icterogenic then that it mythologizes Ismailism and is not a jumble is incorrect. sent7: the radar does not mythologize sweetsop. sent8: the radar does beat and it fleshes treasurer. sent9: if the stunt fleshes cross-examination then it mythologizes Ismailism. sent10: there is nothing such that it is wintry and it does not flesh cross-examination. sent11: there is nothing that is wintry and does flesh cross-examination. sent12: the stunt is a symphony. sent13: if that something does mythologize Ismailism but it does not jumble is incorrect then it does not mythologize Ismailism. sent14: the sweetsop does not mythologize Ismailism or it does not jumble or both if the radar is icterogenic. sent15: there exists nothing that is decorous and does not mythologize Hertz.
sent3 -> int1: the stunt mythologizes Ismailism if the fact that it is wintry and it does not flesh cross-examination is wrong.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the stunt is not non-wintry but it does not flesh cross-examination is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the stunt does not mythologize Ismailism.
sent13 -> int3: if that the stunt mythologizes Ismailism and is not a kind of a jumble does not hold then it does not mythologizes Ismailism.; sent6 -> int4: the fact that the stunt mythologizes Ismailism but it does not jumble is not correct if it is not icterogenic.;
$hypothesis$ = the stunt does not mythologize Ismailism. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the stunt is wintry and it fleshes cross-examination does not hold. sent2: if something fleshes cross-examination it does mythologize Ismailism. sent3: if that something is wintry but it does not flesh cross-examination does not hold it mythologizes Ismailism. sent4: if something does not mythologize sweetsop then that it is not icterogenic and it is a twilight does not hold. sent5: the foolscap does not mythologize sweetsop if the radar fleshes treasurer but it does not mythologize sweetsop. sent6: if something is not icterogenic then that it mythologizes Ismailism and is not a jumble is incorrect. sent7: the radar does not mythologize sweetsop. sent8: the radar does beat and it fleshes treasurer. sent9: if the stunt fleshes cross-examination then it mythologizes Ismailism. sent10: there is nothing such that it is wintry and it does not flesh cross-examination. sent11: there is nothing that is wintry and does flesh cross-examination. sent12: the stunt is a symphony. sent13: if that something does mythologize Ismailism but it does not jumble is incorrect then it does not mythologize Ismailism. sent14: the sweetsop does not mythologize Ismailism or it does not jumble or both if the radar is icterogenic. sent15: there exists nothing that is decorous and does not mythologize Hertz. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the stunt mythologizes Ismailism if the fact that it is wintry and it does not flesh cross-examination is wrong.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the stunt is not non-wintry but it does not flesh cross-examination is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__