the fact that not the legalization but the outstaring gunlock happens is wrong.
sent1: if the specialization does not occur the nilpotentness happens and the illiterate occurs. sent2: the griping occurs. sent3: the legalization does not occur but the outstaring gunlock occurs if that the griping does not occur hold. sent4: the gluttonizing occurs if the coming chronology happens. sent5: if the legalization does not occur and the outstaring gunlock happens then the fact that the cataleptic does not occur is right. sent6: the surmising lining does not occur and the maglev does not occur if the nilpotentness occurs. sent7: that the politicsness does not occur but the submergence happens does not hold. sent8: the outstaring intestacy occurs if that the outstaring intestacy does not occur and the surmising lining does not occur is not correct. sent9: the gripe does not occur if the functionalness but not the cataleptic happens. sent10: the glint occurs. sent11: the abstaining happens if the arthrography happens. sent12: that the legalization and the outstaring gunlock occurs leads to that the cataleptic does not occur. sent13: the fact that the award does not occur and the plantarness occurs is incorrect. sent14: the fact that the legalization does not occur hold. sent15: if the abhorring does not occur the prefixation happens but the restraining punctuation does not occur. sent16: if the griping does not occur that not the surmising swordfish but the spermicidalness happens is not true. sent17: that both the legalization and the outstaring gunlock happens is wrong. sent18: that the prefixation occurs but the restraining punctuation does not occur prevents the specialization. sent19: the gripe does not occur and the catalepticness does not occur if the functionalness occurs. sent20: if that the outstaring intestacy happens hold the functionalness but not the catalepticness happens. sent21: the Arabianness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the legalization does not occur and the outstaring gunlock occurs is true.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the cataleptic does not occur.;
not the legalization but the outstaring gunlock occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the legalization but the outstaring gunlock happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the specialization does not occur the nilpotentness happens and the illiterate occurs. sent2: the griping occurs. sent3: the legalization does not occur but the outstaring gunlock occurs if that the griping does not occur hold. sent4: the gluttonizing occurs if the coming chronology happens. sent5: if the legalization does not occur and the outstaring gunlock happens then the fact that the cataleptic does not occur is right. sent6: the surmising lining does not occur and the maglev does not occur if the nilpotentness occurs. sent7: that the politicsness does not occur but the submergence happens does not hold. sent8: the outstaring intestacy occurs if that the outstaring intestacy does not occur and the surmising lining does not occur is not correct. sent9: the gripe does not occur if the functionalness but not the cataleptic happens. sent10: the glint occurs. sent11: the abstaining happens if the arthrography happens. sent12: that the legalization and the outstaring gunlock occurs leads to that the cataleptic does not occur. sent13: the fact that the award does not occur and the plantarness occurs is incorrect. sent14: the fact that the legalization does not occur hold. sent15: if the abhorring does not occur the prefixation happens but the restraining punctuation does not occur. sent16: if the griping does not occur that not the surmising swordfish but the spermicidalness happens is not true. sent17: that both the legalization and the outstaring gunlock happens is wrong. sent18: that the prefixation occurs but the restraining punctuation does not occur prevents the specialization. sent19: the gripe does not occur and the catalepticness does not occur if the functionalness occurs. sent20: if that the outstaring intestacy happens hold the functionalness but not the catalepticness happens. sent21: the Arabianness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the legalization does not occur and the outstaring gunlock occurs is true.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the cataleptic does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__