the fire-wheel is not non-calisthenic.
sent1: if there exists something such that either it is calisthenic or it is not an icing or both then the treacle is not an icing. sent2: the sensorium is not a kind of a Pediculus if the fact that the screwdriver is not a kind of a Pediculus but it is an icing is wrong. sent3: the prion is not intelligible. sent4: the fact that something does not rummage conglomerate and is intelligible is false if it is not a estaminet. sent5: the screwdriver ices. sent6: if something is a Pediculus then it is non-calisthenic and not an icing. sent7: the flagellum is not colloidal and it is not a crunch. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a screech the prion is a estaminet and/or not unservile. sent9: the coldcream rummages conglomerate. sent10: the fact that that the prion is not the Ligustrum and does not rummage conglomerate is not right if the prion is not intelligible is right. sent11: that either something is calisthenic or it is not an icing or both hold if it is not teratogenic. sent12: if the coldcream does rummage conglomerate then that the prion is not a kind of a Ligustrum and is teratogenic is not right. sent13: the fire-wheel is not a Ligustrum. sent14: if something is not a kind of a blind and does not slag heft the treacle is not a Pediculus. sent15: if that the treacle does not rummage conglomerate and is intelligible does not hold that the screwdriver is a Ligustrum is not incorrect. sent16: the treacle is not teratogenic if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Ligustrum and it is teratogenic does not hold. sent17: if the screwdriver ices it is a kind of non-blind thing that does not slag heft. sent18: there exists something such that it does not rummage conglomerate and it is teratogenic. sent19: if a non-teratogenic thing is not a kind of a Pediculus then the fire-wheel is calisthenic. sent20: The conglomerate rummages coldcream. sent21: there is something such that it is not a screech. sent22: the fire-wheel is teratogenic if the screwdriver is a kind of a Ligustrum.
sent17 & sent5 -> int1: the screwdriver is not a kind of a blind and it does not slag heft.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a blind and it does not slag heft.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the treacle is not a Pediculus.; sent12 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the prion is not a Ligustrum but it is not non-teratogenic is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Ligustrum and is teratogenic does not hold.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the treacle is not teratogenic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the treacle is non-teratogenic and it is not a Pediculus.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not teratogenic and is not a Pediculus.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the sensorium is not a Pediculus.
sent11 -> int9: the fire-wheel is calisthenic or it does not ice or both if it is not teratogenic.; sent10 & sent3 -> int10: that the prion is not a Ligustrum and does not rummage conglomerate does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Ligustrum and it does not rummage conglomerate is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fire-wheel is not non-calisthenic. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that either it is calisthenic or it is not an icing or both then the treacle is not an icing. sent2: the sensorium is not a kind of a Pediculus if the fact that the screwdriver is not a kind of a Pediculus but it is an icing is wrong. sent3: the prion is not intelligible. sent4: the fact that something does not rummage conglomerate and is intelligible is false if it is not a estaminet. sent5: the screwdriver ices. sent6: if something is a Pediculus then it is non-calisthenic and not an icing. sent7: the flagellum is not colloidal and it is not a crunch. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a screech the prion is a estaminet and/or not unservile. sent9: the coldcream rummages conglomerate. sent10: the fact that that the prion is not the Ligustrum and does not rummage conglomerate is not right if the prion is not intelligible is right. sent11: that either something is calisthenic or it is not an icing or both hold if it is not teratogenic. sent12: if the coldcream does rummage conglomerate then that the prion is not a kind of a Ligustrum and is teratogenic is not right. sent13: the fire-wheel is not a Ligustrum. sent14: if something is not a kind of a blind and does not slag heft the treacle is not a Pediculus. sent15: if that the treacle does not rummage conglomerate and is intelligible does not hold that the screwdriver is a Ligustrum is not incorrect. sent16: the treacle is not teratogenic if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Ligustrum and it is teratogenic does not hold. sent17: if the screwdriver ices it is a kind of non-blind thing that does not slag heft. sent18: there exists something such that it does not rummage conglomerate and it is teratogenic. sent19: if a non-teratogenic thing is not a kind of a Pediculus then the fire-wheel is calisthenic. sent20: The conglomerate rummages coldcream. sent21: there is something such that it is not a screech. sent22: the fire-wheel is teratogenic if the screwdriver is a kind of a Ligustrum. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent5 -> int1: the screwdriver is not a kind of a blind and it does not slag heft.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a blind and it does not slag heft.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the treacle is not a Pediculus.; sent12 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the prion is not a Ligustrum but it is not non-teratogenic is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Ligustrum and is teratogenic does not hold.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the treacle is not teratogenic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the treacle is non-teratogenic and it is not a Pediculus.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not teratogenic and is not a Pediculus.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__