the fact that not the splurge but the lingual happens does not hold.
sent1: the Himalayanness and the sensitizing Wiffle occurs. sent2: the fact that that the Himalayanness does not occur causes that not the embezzlement but the bespangling Tang happens is not wrong. sent3: if the Himalayanness does not occur that the splurge does not occur but the lingual happens is not right. sent4: that the splurge does not occur and the lingual happens is brought about by the Himalayanness. sent5: the sensitizing Wiffle occurs. sent6: the lingualness happens. sent7: the Himalayanness is prevented by that the sensitizing Wiffle does not occur and the automatic does not occur. sent8: not the embezzlement but the acceleration occurs. sent9: that the lingual does not occur is prevented by the Himalayanness.
sent1 -> int1: the Himalayanness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
not the embezzlement but the bespangling Tang occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the splurge but the lingual happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Himalayanness and the sensitizing Wiffle occurs. sent2: the fact that that the Himalayanness does not occur causes that not the embezzlement but the bespangling Tang happens is not wrong. sent3: if the Himalayanness does not occur that the splurge does not occur but the lingual happens is not right. sent4: that the splurge does not occur and the lingual happens is brought about by the Himalayanness. sent5: the sensitizing Wiffle occurs. sent6: the lingualness happens. sent7: the Himalayanness is prevented by that the sensitizing Wiffle does not occur and the automatic does not occur. sent8: not the embezzlement but the acceleration occurs. sent9: that the lingual does not occur is prevented by the Himalayanness. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the Himalayanness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__