there exists something such that if it prophesies and is not alike then it does not hug adjudicator.
sent1: if something snuffles shamefacedness and does hug adjudicator then it does not reciprocate bister. sent2: the zeolite does not reciprocate bister if the fact that the C is a whist and does not bide is false. sent3: the xanthomonad is not a kind of a whist if it does not revalue. sent4: the fact that something is a kind of a gravity-assist and it revalues is not true if it is not ammino. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is a brokerage hold then the brioche is not ammino. sent6: if a whist does not hug adjudicator then the fact that it does snuffle shamefacedness hold. sent7: the xanthomonad does not revalue. sent8: the cumulonimbus does reciprocate bister and it bides if the xanthomonad is not a whist. sent9: the fact that the fact that the xanthomonad does not hug adjudicator and does snuffle shamefacedness is right does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it does not reciprocate bister is correct. sent10: if something does not revalue that it is a kind of a whist and it does not bide is false. sent11: something is a brokerage. sent12: the C does not revalue if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a gravity-assist and it revalue is not correct. sent13: something snuffles shamefacedness if it prophesies and it is not alike.
sent13 -> int1: if the fact that the cumulonimbus prophesies and is unalike is not wrong then it does snuffle shamefacedness.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cumulonimbus prophesies and is not alike.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the cumulonimbus does snuffle shamefacedness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cumulonimbus hugs adjudicator hold.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the cumulonimbus snuffles shamefacedness and it does hug adjudicator.; sent1 -> int4: if the cumulonimbus does snuffle shamefacedness and it does hug adjudicator it does not reciprocate bister.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cumulonimbus does not reciprocate bister.; sent3 & sent7 -> int6: the xanthomonad is not a whist.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the cumulonimbus reciprocates bister and it does bide.; int7 -> int8: the cumulonimbus does reciprocate bister.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the cumulonimbus does not hug adjudicator.; [assump2] & int10 -> int11: the cumulonimbus does not hug adjudicator if it does prophesy and is not alike.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the diver is not approachable.
sent10 -> int12: if that the C does not revalue is not wrong the fact that it is a kind of a whist that does not bide is not true.; sent4 -> int13: the fact that the brioche is a kind of a gravity-assist and it does revalue is false if it is not ammino.; sent11 & sent5 -> int14: the brioche is not ammino.; int13 & int14 -> int15: that the brioche is a gravity-assist and it does revalue is false.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that the fact that it is a gravity-assist and it does revalue is not true.; int16 & sent12 -> int17: that the C does not revalue is not incorrect.; int12 & int17 -> int18: that the C is a whist that does not bide is incorrect.; sent2 & int18 -> int19: the zeolite does not reciprocate bister.; int19 -> int20: something does not reciprocate bister.; int20 & sent9 -> int21: that the xanthomonad does not hug adjudicator and snuffles shamefacedness is false.; int21 -> int22: there is something such that the fact that it does not hug adjudicator and it snuffles shamefacedness is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it prophesies and is not alike then it does not hug adjudicator. ; $context$ = sent1: if something snuffles shamefacedness and does hug adjudicator then it does not reciprocate bister. sent2: the zeolite does not reciprocate bister if the fact that the C is a whist and does not bide is false. sent3: the xanthomonad is not a kind of a whist if it does not revalue. sent4: the fact that something is a kind of a gravity-assist and it revalues is not true if it is not ammino. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is a brokerage hold then the brioche is not ammino. sent6: if a whist does not hug adjudicator then the fact that it does snuffle shamefacedness hold. sent7: the xanthomonad does not revalue. sent8: the cumulonimbus does reciprocate bister and it bides if the xanthomonad is not a whist. sent9: the fact that the fact that the xanthomonad does not hug adjudicator and does snuffle shamefacedness is right does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it does not reciprocate bister is correct. sent10: if something does not revalue that it is a kind of a whist and it does not bide is false. sent11: something is a brokerage. sent12: the C does not revalue if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a gravity-assist and it revalue is not correct. sent13: something snuffles shamefacedness if it prophesies and it is not alike. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the fact that the cumulonimbus prophesies and is unalike is not wrong then it does snuffle shamefacedness.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cumulonimbus prophesies and is not alike.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the cumulonimbus does snuffle shamefacedness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cumulonimbus hugs adjudicator hold.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the cumulonimbus snuffles shamefacedness and it does hug adjudicator.; sent1 -> int4: if the cumulonimbus does snuffle shamefacedness and it does hug adjudicator it does not reciprocate bister.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cumulonimbus does not reciprocate bister.; sent3 & sent7 -> int6: the xanthomonad is not a whist.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the cumulonimbus reciprocates bister and it does bide.; int7 -> int8: the cumulonimbus does reciprocate bister.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the cumulonimbus does not hug adjudicator.; [assump2] & int10 -> int11: the cumulonimbus does not hug adjudicator if it does prophesy and is not alike.; int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__