that the glyptography is a kind of a sower if that the calcification stretches zymology is not incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: either something is not a rigging or it does not sermonize calcification or both if it is not associational. sent2: if something does not stretch zymology then it either does appoint or does stoke Habsburg or both. sent3: something is a ex-spouse if it is a kind of a freshman. sent4: if the epidendron is Fijian then the glyptography is a sower. sent5: if the auricle is not a damper then the glyptography is a freshman. sent6: something that is not a kind of a coelenteron is not excitable. sent7: the nutlet is not a sower. sent8: something does not stretch zymology and is not a sower if the fact that the fact that it is excitable is not false is not right. sent9: the epidendron is a Fijian if the megalocyte does not appoint. sent10: the megalocyte stokes Habsburg. sent11: the calcification does appoint. sent12: The Habsburg stokes megalocyte. sent13: the epidendron is not associational if the glyptography is a ex-spouse. sent14: the calcification is a kind of a Turkmen. sent15: the fact that the fact that the calcification does stretch zymology hold is not correct if the megalocyte does stoke Habsburg and appoints. sent16: if the auricle is not a freshman then the glyptography is a freshman. sent17: the calcification stretches zymology if the megalocyte stokes Habsburg and appoints. sent18: if something is not a rigging and/or it does not sermonize calcification then it is not a coelenteron. sent19: the auricle is not a freshman and/or it is not a damper. sent20: the fact that the megalocyte does not stretch zymology is not wrong if the epidendron does not stretch zymology and is not a sower.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the megalocyte appoints.; sent10 & assump2 -> int1: the megalocyte stokes Habsburg and it does appoint.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the calcification does not stretch zymology.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calcification does stretch zymology.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the megalocyte does not appoint.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the epidendron is a kind of a Fijian.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the glyptography is a kind of a sower.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the calcification is a Fijian.
sent2 -> int7: if the megalocyte does not stretch zymology then either it does appoint or it does stoke Habsburg or both.; sent8 -> int8: if the epidendron is not excitable then it does not stretch zymology and is not a sower.; sent6 -> int9: if the epidendron is not a coelenteron then it is not excitable.; sent18 -> int10: if the epidendron is not a rigging and/or does not sermonize calcification then the fact that it is not a coelenteron is not wrong.; sent1 -> int11: the fact that the epidendron is not a kind of a rigging or it does not sermonize calcification or both hold if it is not associational.; sent3 -> int12: the glyptography is a ex-spouse if it is a kind of a freshman.; sent19 & sent16 & sent5 -> int13: the glyptography is a freshman.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the glyptography is a kind of a ex-spouse.; sent13 & int14 -> int15: the epidendron is not associational.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the epidendron is not a rigging and/or it does not sermonize calcification hold.; int10 & int16 -> int17: the epidendron is not a coelenteron.; int9 & int17 -> int18: the epidendron is not excitable.; int8 & int18 -> int19: the epidendron does not stretch zymology and is not a sower.; sent20 & int19 -> int20: the megalocyte does not stretch zymology.; int7 & int20 -> int21: the megalocyte appoints or it does stoke Habsburg or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the glyptography is a kind of a sower if that the calcification stretches zymology is not incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: either something is not a rigging or it does not sermonize calcification or both if it is not associational. sent2: if something does not stretch zymology then it either does appoint or does stoke Habsburg or both. sent3: something is a ex-spouse if it is a kind of a freshman. sent4: if the epidendron is Fijian then the glyptography is a sower. sent5: if the auricle is not a damper then the glyptography is a freshman. sent6: something that is not a kind of a coelenteron is not excitable. sent7: the nutlet is not a sower. sent8: something does not stretch zymology and is not a sower if the fact that the fact that it is excitable is not false is not right. sent9: the epidendron is a Fijian if the megalocyte does not appoint. sent10: the megalocyte stokes Habsburg. sent11: the calcification does appoint. sent12: The Habsburg stokes megalocyte. sent13: the epidendron is not associational if the glyptography is a ex-spouse. sent14: the calcification is a kind of a Turkmen. sent15: the fact that the fact that the calcification does stretch zymology hold is not correct if the megalocyte does stoke Habsburg and appoints. sent16: if the auricle is not a freshman then the glyptography is a freshman. sent17: the calcification stretches zymology if the megalocyte stokes Habsburg and appoints. sent18: if something is not a rigging and/or it does not sermonize calcification then it is not a coelenteron. sent19: the auricle is not a freshman and/or it is not a damper. sent20: the fact that the megalocyte does not stretch zymology is not wrong if the epidendron does not stretch zymology and is not a sower. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the megalocyte appoints.; sent10 & assump2 -> int1: the megalocyte stokes Habsburg and it does appoint.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the calcification does not stretch zymology.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calcification does stretch zymology.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the megalocyte does not appoint.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the epidendron is a kind of a Fijian.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the glyptography is a kind of a sower.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__