the beignet is a Bromo-seltzer but not intracerebral.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a subsidiary and it is not an eminence is not correct then the edger is a subsidiary. sent2: if the beignet is a kind of a Macleod the canon is not a Macleod but it is patriarchal. sent3: the canon is patriarchal if the beignet is a Macleod. sent4: the fact that something is not patriarchal but a beaver is incorrect if it is a subsidiary. sent5: if the fact that something is eutherian is not wrong then it is a Macleod. sent6: if something that does not guarantee drosophila is not a kind of a pull-up the drosophila is not Incan. sent7: something that is a Bromo-seltzer and is not intracerebral is a black. sent8: there is something such that it does not guarantee drosophila and it is not a pull-up. sent9: if the fact that something is non-patriarchal thing that is a beaver is false it is not a black. sent10: the canon is not non-patriarchal. sent11: the beignet is a Bromo-seltzer. sent12: the beignet is eutherian if that it is a kind of a black is correct. sent13: the Liederkranz is a Bromo-seltzer. sent14: if something does not arrogate Hyaenidae the fact that it is not a subsidiary and is not an eminence is false. sent15: if the fact that the canon is not a Macleod hold the pyrope is eutherian. sent16: the fact that something is a kind of a Bromo-seltzer but it is not a Haitian does not hold if it is eutherian. sent17: if the drosophila is not ultramontane but it does arrogate Hyaenidae the niece does not arrogate Hyaenidae. sent18: if the edger is not black then the canon is not a Macleod or not eutherian or both. sent19: the canon is a Macleod. sent20: something is not a kind of a ultramontane but it arrogates Hyaenidae if it is not Incan.
sent7 -> int1: the beignet is not non-black if that it is both a Bromo-seltzer and not intracerebral is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beignet is a Bromo-seltzer but not intracerebral.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the beignet is black is not incorrect.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the beignet is eutherian.; sent5 -> int4: if the beignet is eutherian it is a kind of a Macleod.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the beignet is a Macleod.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the canon is not a kind of a Macleod but it is patriarchal.; int6 -> int7: the canon is not a Macleod.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pyrope is a kind of a Bromo-seltzer and is not Haitian is not right.
sent16 -> int9: that the pyrope is a Bromo-seltzer that is not a kind of a Haitian is not right if it is eutherian.; sent9 -> int10: if that the edger is a kind of non-patriarchal thing that is a beaver is not true it is not black.; sent4 -> int11: if the edger is a subsidiary then that it is not patriarchal but a beaver is not true.; sent14 -> int12: the fact that the niece is not a kind of a subsidiary and it is not a kind of an eminence is not right if it does not arrogate Hyaenidae.; sent20 -> int13: the drosophila is not a kind of a ultramontane but it does arrogate Hyaenidae if it is not Incan.; sent8 & sent6 -> int14: the drosophila is not Incan.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the drosophila is a kind of non-ultramontane thing that does arrogate Hyaenidae.; sent17 & int15 -> int16: the niece does not arrogate Hyaenidae.; int12 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the niece is not a kind of a subsidiary and it is not an eminence does not hold.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that that it is not a subsidiary and is not a kind of an eminence is not right.; int18 & sent1 -> int19: the edger is a kind of a subsidiary.; int11 & int19 -> int20: that the edger is not patriarchal but it is a beaver is false.; int10 & int20 -> int21: that the edger is not black is right.; sent18 & int21 -> int22: either the canon is not a Macleod or it is not eutherian or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the beignet is a Bromo-seltzer but not intracerebral. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a subsidiary and it is not an eminence is not correct then the edger is a subsidiary. sent2: if the beignet is a kind of a Macleod the canon is not a Macleod but it is patriarchal. sent3: the canon is patriarchal if the beignet is a Macleod. sent4: the fact that something is not patriarchal but a beaver is incorrect if it is a subsidiary. sent5: if the fact that something is eutherian is not wrong then it is a Macleod. sent6: if something that does not guarantee drosophila is not a kind of a pull-up the drosophila is not Incan. sent7: something that is a Bromo-seltzer and is not intracerebral is a black. sent8: there is something such that it does not guarantee drosophila and it is not a pull-up. sent9: if the fact that something is non-patriarchal thing that is a beaver is false it is not a black. sent10: the canon is not non-patriarchal. sent11: the beignet is a Bromo-seltzer. sent12: the beignet is eutherian if that it is a kind of a black is correct. sent13: the Liederkranz is a Bromo-seltzer. sent14: if something does not arrogate Hyaenidae the fact that it is not a subsidiary and is not an eminence is false. sent15: if the fact that the canon is not a Macleod hold the pyrope is eutherian. sent16: the fact that something is a kind of a Bromo-seltzer but it is not a Haitian does not hold if it is eutherian. sent17: if the drosophila is not ultramontane but it does arrogate Hyaenidae the niece does not arrogate Hyaenidae. sent18: if the edger is not black then the canon is not a Macleod or not eutherian or both. sent19: the canon is a Macleod. sent20: something is not a kind of a ultramontane but it arrogates Hyaenidae if it is not Incan. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the beignet is not non-black if that it is both a Bromo-seltzer and not intracerebral is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beignet is a Bromo-seltzer but not intracerebral.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the beignet is black is not incorrect.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the beignet is eutherian.; sent5 -> int4: if the beignet is eutherian it is a kind of a Macleod.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the beignet is a Macleod.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the canon is not a kind of a Macleod but it is patriarchal.; int6 -> int7: the canon is not a Macleod.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__