the fact that the SOB outgrows Aphasmidia but it is not a scud is incorrect.
sent1: if something is comparable the fact that it outgrows Aphasmidia and it is not a scud does not hold. sent2: if there is something such that it is a semicircle the SOB is herbivorous. sent3: the elver is a semicircle. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a jiggered. sent5: there is something such that it is not incomparable. sent6: if the possible is not herbivorous then that the SOB is a combo and it does hone possible is not correct. sent7: if something is not incomparable then the ern does not hone possible. sent8: if the ern does not hone possible then the possible does hone possible but it is not hypothermic. sent9: the SOB is not a scud if something is a unworthiness. sent10: if an intertribal thing is not humic it does not outgrow throes. sent11: something is logistics. sent12: that the oscitancy is a combo but it is not a unworthiness is not true if the possible does not cachinnate. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is both attachable and not fictile does not hold. sent14: that the oscitancy is a combo and it is a kind of a unworthiness does not hold. sent15: the SOB is not spectral. sent16: the ern is not a kind of a unworthiness. sent17: there is something such that it is a kind of a combo and it is not a kind of a unworthiness. sent18: if something hones possible but it is not hypothermic it does not cachinnate. sent19: if there is something such that that it is a combo that is not a unworthiness is incorrect then the SOB is not a kind of a scud. sent20: that the possible cachinnates and is a unworthiness is not correct. sent21: there is something such that that it is a semicircle and herbivorous is wrong. sent22: if there exists something such that it is a semicircle the fact that the SOB does outgrow Aphasmidia and is herbivorous is not false. sent23: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a scud that is herbivorous is incorrect. sent24: if there is something such that that it does cachinnate and is a unworthiness is not true then the fact that the ern is not hypothermic hold. sent25: the ern is fictile. sent26: the possible hones possible. sent27: something is eschatological.
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the ern does not hone possible.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the possible hones possible and is not hypothermic.; sent18 -> int3: the possible does not cachinnate if it hones possible and is not hypothermic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the possible does not cachinnate.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: that the fact that the oscitancy is a combo but it is not a kind of a unworthiness does not hold is not wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a combo and it is not a unworthiness is wrong.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the SOB does not scud.; sent3 -> int8: there is something such that it is a semicircle.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the SOB outgrows Aphasmidia and it is herbivorous.; int9 -> int10: the SOB does outgrow Aphasmidia.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the SOB outgrows Aphasmidia and is not a scud is false.
sent1 -> int11: the fact that the SOB outgrows Aphasmidia but it does not scud is wrong if it is not incomparable.; sent20 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it does cachinnate and it is a kind of a unworthiness is incorrect.; int12 & sent24 -> int13: the ern is not hypothermic.; int13 -> int14: something is not hypothermic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the SOB outgrows Aphasmidia but it is not a scud is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is comparable the fact that it outgrows Aphasmidia and it is not a scud does not hold. sent2: if there is something such that it is a semicircle the SOB is herbivorous. sent3: the elver is a semicircle. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a jiggered. sent5: there is something such that it is not incomparable. sent6: if the possible is not herbivorous then that the SOB is a combo and it does hone possible is not correct. sent7: if something is not incomparable then the ern does not hone possible. sent8: if the ern does not hone possible then the possible does hone possible but it is not hypothermic. sent9: the SOB is not a scud if something is a unworthiness. sent10: if an intertribal thing is not humic it does not outgrow throes. sent11: something is logistics. sent12: that the oscitancy is a combo but it is not a unworthiness is not true if the possible does not cachinnate. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is both attachable and not fictile does not hold. sent14: that the oscitancy is a combo and it is a kind of a unworthiness does not hold. sent15: the SOB is not spectral. sent16: the ern is not a kind of a unworthiness. sent17: there is something such that it is a kind of a combo and it is not a kind of a unworthiness. sent18: if something hones possible but it is not hypothermic it does not cachinnate. sent19: if there is something such that that it is a combo that is not a unworthiness is incorrect then the SOB is not a kind of a scud. sent20: that the possible cachinnates and is a unworthiness is not correct. sent21: there is something such that that it is a semicircle and herbivorous is wrong. sent22: if there exists something such that it is a semicircle the fact that the SOB does outgrow Aphasmidia and is herbivorous is not false. sent23: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a scud that is herbivorous is incorrect. sent24: if there is something such that that it does cachinnate and is a unworthiness is not true then the fact that the ern is not hypothermic hold. sent25: the ern is fictile. sent26: the possible hones possible. sent27: something is eschatological. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the ern does not hone possible.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the possible hones possible and is not hypothermic.; sent18 -> int3: the possible does not cachinnate if it hones possible and is not hypothermic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the possible does not cachinnate.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: that the fact that the oscitancy is a combo but it is not a kind of a unworthiness does not hold is not wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a combo and it is not a unworthiness is wrong.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the SOB does not scud.; sent3 -> int8: there is something such that it is a semicircle.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the SOB outgrows Aphasmidia and it is herbivorous.; int9 -> int10: the SOB does outgrow Aphasmidia.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__