the mid-water is an ascot.
sent1: if that something is not cytoarchitectural but it is a solicitude is not true then it is a allemande. sent2: that that the mid-water is not an ascot but a allemande is false is right. sent3: the fact that the carbonara possesses and is a coaster does not hold if something is antistrophic. sent4: the fact that the simple is not a coaster is not wrong if that the carbonara does possess and is a coaster is incorrect. sent5: that the mid-water is a kind of cytoarchitectural a solicitude is false. sent6: something is a lightlessness if it is not a branched. sent7: if something encrusts Wodehouse the Nyala is a allemande or it is an ascot or both. sent8: the battlement does not monologuize and is not frictionless if the simple is not a coaster. sent9: the Nyala does bedew sou'-sou'-east if the battlement is an ascot. sent10: something is a allemande if it is cytoarchitectural. sent11: that the mid-water is not cytoarchitectural but it is a kind of a solicitude is not right. sent12: something is a bend and does encrust Wodehouse if it does not monologuize. sent13: the nook is antistrophic.
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the mid-water is not cytoarchitectural but it is a solicitude is false it is a kind of a allemande.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the mid-water is a allemande is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mid-water is not a kind of an ascot.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the mid-water is not a kind of an ascot but it is a allemande.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the disposal does not bedew sou'-sou'-east and encrusts cardioid is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the mid-water is an ascot. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not cytoarchitectural but it is a solicitude is not true then it is a allemande. sent2: that that the mid-water is not an ascot but a allemande is false is right. sent3: the fact that the carbonara possesses and is a coaster does not hold if something is antistrophic. sent4: the fact that the simple is not a coaster is not wrong if that the carbonara does possess and is a coaster is incorrect. sent5: that the mid-water is a kind of cytoarchitectural a solicitude is false. sent6: something is a lightlessness if it is not a branched. sent7: if something encrusts Wodehouse the Nyala is a allemande or it is an ascot or both. sent8: the battlement does not monologuize and is not frictionless if the simple is not a coaster. sent9: the Nyala does bedew sou'-sou'-east if the battlement is an ascot. sent10: something is a allemande if it is cytoarchitectural. sent11: that the mid-water is not cytoarchitectural but it is a kind of a solicitude is not right. sent12: something is a bend and does encrust Wodehouse if it does not monologuize. sent13: the nook is antistrophic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the mid-water is not cytoarchitectural but it is a solicitude is false it is a kind of a allemande.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the mid-water is a allemande is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mid-water is not a kind of an ascot.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the mid-water is not a kind of an ascot but it is a allemande.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__