the munition is a kind of a cane if the scorer does not dangle.
sent1: if the Oxbridge is not reductionist the fact that the sildenafil is a kind of reductionist thing that is conductive is false. sent2: the fact that the sildenafil is reductionist and is conductive does not hold. sent3: if the sildenafil is reductionist the munition does cane. sent4: the munition is a cane if the fact that the sildenafil is not reductionist and is conductive is incorrect. sent5: the Oxbridge is not reductionist if the scorer dangles and is not a selectwoman. sent6: the fact that the fact that the sildenafil is reductionist and it is conductive hold is not correct if the Oxbridge is not reductionist. sent7: the scorer is not a selectwoman. sent8: if that the sildenafil is not reductionist but conductive is not right then the fact that the Oxbridge is a cane is true. sent9: if the scorer does dangle the munition canes. sent10: the fact that the scorer does dangle and is a kind of a selectwoman does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scorer does dangle but it is not a selectwoman.; assump2 -> int1: the scorer does dangle.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scorer does not dangle.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the scorer dangles but it is not a selectwoman is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the munition is a kind of a cane if the scorer does not dangle. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Oxbridge is not reductionist the fact that the sildenafil is a kind of reductionist thing that is conductive is false. sent2: the fact that the sildenafil is reductionist and is conductive does not hold. sent3: if the sildenafil is reductionist the munition does cane. sent4: the munition is a cane if the fact that the sildenafil is not reductionist and is conductive is incorrect. sent5: the Oxbridge is not reductionist if the scorer dangles and is not a selectwoman. sent6: the fact that the fact that the sildenafil is reductionist and it is conductive hold is not correct if the Oxbridge is not reductionist. sent7: the scorer is not a selectwoman. sent8: if that the sildenafil is not reductionist but conductive is not right then the fact that the Oxbridge is a cane is true. sent9: if the scorer does dangle the munition canes. sent10: the fact that the scorer does dangle and is a kind of a selectwoman does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scorer does dangle but it is not a selectwoman.; assump2 -> int1: the scorer does dangle.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scorer does not dangle.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the scorer dangles but it is not a selectwoman is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__