the fact that that the evangelism happens and the prejudicing primer does not occur is not right hold.
sent1: that the solace does not occur but the utopianness occurs is brought about by that the cambering cine-film happens. sent2: the cambering cine-film happens. sent3: the evangelism but not the prejudicing primer happens if the utopianness occurs.
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: not the solace but the utopianness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the utopianness happens.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the evangelism happens and the prejudicing primer does not occur is not right hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the solace does not occur but the utopianness occurs is brought about by that the cambering cine-film happens. sent2: the cambering cine-film happens. sent3: the evangelism but not the prejudicing primer happens if the utopianness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: not the solace but the utopianness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the utopianness happens.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__