if the Raja is not a dock then the cuticula is thermostatics and it adducts rascality.
sent1: the kiaat is a hegemony and it is a kind of a Tyrannus if there is something such that it does not adduct pectin. sent2: that if something does adduct rascality and docks it does not adduct conciliator hold. sent3: something is a kind of a foam that is not Bahamian if it is not a shave. sent4: the stole is leaden but it is not back-channel. sent5: if the carboxyl adducts conciliator the Raja is a kind of a dock. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a hand and it is not a kind of a ulteriority is not true then the yellowtail does not adduct pectin. sent7: if the Raja is a dock it does adduct conciliator. sent8: the Raja is a woodcock. sent9: if that the rockrose is a kind of a corer is not incorrect the carboxyl does adduct conciliator. sent10: if the fact that that something is a mistake but it does not turn living-room is correct is incorrect it is not a mistake. sent11: the fact that the cuticula is thermostatics is not incorrect if it is a woodcock. sent12: the cuticula is a kind of a corer. sent13: the fact that the mariposa is not a hand and it is not a ulteriority is not correct if the stole does not wear Eriophyllum. sent14: the fact that that the Raja does mistake but it does not turn living-room is false is correct if that the drippings is a kind of a foam is not false. sent15: something is a woodcock if that it does mistake or it does not turn living-room or both is wrong. sent16: the carboxyl does adduct rascality if the cuticula does adduct conciliator. sent17: the cuticula adducts conciliator if the fact that the carboxyl does dock hold. sent18: the rockrose is unlikable and/or it is a kind of a corer if the fact that the cuticula does not adduct rascality hold. sent19: the drippings is not a shave if the kiaat is a compound and does not shave. sent20: something does not wear Eriophyllum if it is leaden and it is not back-channel. sent21: if something is a hegemony then it is compound thing that is not a kind of a shave. sent22: if that the rockrose is unlikable is not false the carboxyl does adduct conciliator. sent23: the cuticula is a woodcock if the fact that it is a mistake and/or it turns living-room is false. sent24: the fact that either the cuticula is a mistake or it does not turn living-room or both is not correct. sent25: the rockrose adducts rascality if there is something such that it adducts conciliator. sent26: the carboxyl is not a kind of a woodcock if the Raja is not a mistake.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cuticula does not adduct rascality.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the rockrose is unlikable and/or it is a corer.; int1 & sent22 & sent9 -> int2: the carboxyl does adduct conciliator.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Raja is a dock.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Raja does not dock.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cuticula adducts rascality.; sent15 -> int6: if the fact that either the cuticula mistakes or it does not turn living-room or both does not hold then it is a woodcock.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: the cuticula is a kind of a woodcock.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: the cuticula is thermostatics.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the cuticula is thermostatics and adducts rascality.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the dhole does not adduct conciliator.
sent2 -> int10: if the dhole adducts rascality and it is a dock then that it does not adduct conciliator is true.;
$hypothesis$ = if the Raja is not a dock then the cuticula is thermostatics and it adducts rascality. ; $context$ = sent1: the kiaat is a hegemony and it is a kind of a Tyrannus if there is something such that it does not adduct pectin. sent2: that if something does adduct rascality and docks it does not adduct conciliator hold. sent3: something is a kind of a foam that is not Bahamian if it is not a shave. sent4: the stole is leaden but it is not back-channel. sent5: if the carboxyl adducts conciliator the Raja is a kind of a dock. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a hand and it is not a kind of a ulteriority is not true then the yellowtail does not adduct pectin. sent7: if the Raja is a dock it does adduct conciliator. sent8: the Raja is a woodcock. sent9: if that the rockrose is a kind of a corer is not incorrect the carboxyl does adduct conciliator. sent10: if the fact that that something is a mistake but it does not turn living-room is correct is incorrect it is not a mistake. sent11: the fact that the cuticula is thermostatics is not incorrect if it is a woodcock. sent12: the cuticula is a kind of a corer. sent13: the fact that the mariposa is not a hand and it is not a ulteriority is not correct if the stole does not wear Eriophyllum. sent14: the fact that that the Raja does mistake but it does not turn living-room is false is correct if that the drippings is a kind of a foam is not false. sent15: something is a woodcock if that it does mistake or it does not turn living-room or both is wrong. sent16: the carboxyl does adduct rascality if the cuticula does adduct conciliator. sent17: the cuticula adducts conciliator if the fact that the carboxyl does dock hold. sent18: the rockrose is unlikable and/or it is a kind of a corer if the fact that the cuticula does not adduct rascality hold. sent19: the drippings is not a shave if the kiaat is a compound and does not shave. sent20: something does not wear Eriophyllum if it is leaden and it is not back-channel. sent21: if something is a hegemony then it is compound thing that is not a kind of a shave. sent22: if that the rockrose is unlikable is not false the carboxyl does adduct conciliator. sent23: the cuticula is a woodcock if the fact that it is a mistake and/or it turns living-room is false. sent24: the fact that either the cuticula is a mistake or it does not turn living-room or both is not correct. sent25: the rockrose adducts rascality if there is something such that it adducts conciliator. sent26: the carboxyl is not a kind of a woodcock if the Raja is not a mistake. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cuticula does not adduct rascality.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the rockrose is unlikable and/or it is a corer.; int1 & sent22 & sent9 -> int2: the carboxyl does adduct conciliator.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Raja is a dock.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Raja does not dock.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cuticula adducts rascality.; sent15 -> int6: if the fact that either the cuticula mistakes or it does not turn living-room or both does not hold then it is a woodcock.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: the cuticula is a kind of a woodcock.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: the cuticula is thermostatics.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the cuticula is thermostatics and adducts rascality.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__