the convert is a playsuit and is a aldehyde.
sent1: something that is a Santiago does repent carnosaur. sent2: if something is fishy it is a transitivity. sent3: the convert is a playsuit if that something is a transitivity or it is a Chechen or both is correct. sent4: the scullery does not chomp jampan and does not repaint. sent5: the design is a transitivity and/or it is a playsuit. sent6: the design does recur. sent7: a transitivity that is not a brew is not fishy. sent8: the convert nags aquarium. sent9: the convert is a aldehyde. sent10: the fact that if something recurs then it brews is correct. sent11: if the scullery does not chomp jampan and does not repaint the fact that the fondler chomp jampan is not wrong. sent12: if the fondler does not chomp fill and/or it does chomp jampan the wing-nut is not unsent. sent13: if the cementum does not recur the fact that the convert is a playsuit and it is a aldehyde is false. sent14: the fact that the design is a sundial is not wrong. sent15: the autochthon is not a Chechen if the wing-nut is not a squint but it is a copilot. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Chechen is right the convert is a playsuit. sent17: the fact that the design is not non-fishy is not incorrect if it is a kind of a brew. sent18: that if something does nag Varuna then it does nag subsidy is not false. sent19: if something is not unsent then it is not a squint and is a copilot.
sent10 -> int1: if the design does recur it does brew.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the design is a kind of a brew is not wrong.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the design is fishy.; sent2 -> int4: the design is a transitivity if it is fishy.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the design is a transitivity is right.; int5 -> int6: the design is a transitivity and/or is a Chechen.; int6 -> int7: something is a transitivity or it is a kind of a Chechen or both.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the convert is a playsuit.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the convert is a playsuit that is a aldehyde does not hold.
sent7 -> int9: if the autochthon is a transitivity but it is not a kind of a brew it is not fishy.; sent19 -> int10: if the wing-nut is not unsent then that it is not a kind of a squint and is a copilot is correct.; sent11 & sent4 -> int11: the fondler does chomp jampan.; int11 -> int12: the fondler does not chomp fill and/or it chomps jampan.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: the wing-nut is sent.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the wing-nut does not squint but it is a kind of a copilot.; sent15 & int14 -> int15: the autochthon is not a Chechen.;
$hypothesis$ = the convert is a playsuit and is a aldehyde. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is a Santiago does repent carnosaur. sent2: if something is fishy it is a transitivity. sent3: the convert is a playsuit if that something is a transitivity or it is a Chechen or both is correct. sent4: the scullery does not chomp jampan and does not repaint. sent5: the design is a transitivity and/or it is a playsuit. sent6: the design does recur. sent7: a transitivity that is not a brew is not fishy. sent8: the convert nags aquarium. sent9: the convert is a aldehyde. sent10: the fact that if something recurs then it brews is correct. sent11: if the scullery does not chomp jampan and does not repaint the fact that the fondler chomp jampan is not wrong. sent12: if the fondler does not chomp fill and/or it does chomp jampan the wing-nut is not unsent. sent13: if the cementum does not recur the fact that the convert is a playsuit and it is a aldehyde is false. sent14: the fact that the design is a sundial is not wrong. sent15: the autochthon is not a Chechen if the wing-nut is not a squint but it is a copilot. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Chechen is right the convert is a playsuit. sent17: the fact that the design is not non-fishy is not incorrect if it is a kind of a brew. sent18: that if something does nag Varuna then it does nag subsidy is not false. sent19: if something is not unsent then it is not a squint and is a copilot. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the design does recur it does brew.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the design is a kind of a brew is not wrong.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the design is fishy.; sent2 -> int4: the design is a transitivity if it is fishy.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the design is a transitivity is right.; int5 -> int6: the design is a transitivity and/or is a Chechen.; int6 -> int7: something is a transitivity or it is a kind of a Chechen or both.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the convert is a playsuit.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__