that if the cheerer does navigate the chancery is not machine-made and it is not a kind of a stabling is incorrect.
sent1: if the cheerer is machine-made the chancery is not machine-made but it does stable. sent2: the chancery is not machine-made if the cheerer is machine-made. sent3: if the cheerer does navigate the chancery is not machine-made. sent4: if the chancery is machine-made then that it does navigate is right. sent5: the cheerer is not machine-made and it does not stable if the chancery is machine-made. sent6: the dumps is not machine-made and not stabling if the cheerer is not machine-made. sent7: the fact that the cheerer is a stabling is not incorrect. sent8: the cheerer does hypnotize Desmidiaceae. sent9: the cheerer is non-machine-made thing that does not stable if the chancery does navigate. sent10: the cheerer does not stable and does not navigate if the chancery is machine-made. sent11: the chancery is not machine-made and is not a stabling if the cheerer is machine-made. sent12: if something is machine-made it does hypnotize bibliotist. sent13: the chancery is not machine-made. sent14: the chancery is not machine-made but it stables if the cheerer navigates. sent15: the chancery is not machine-made but it does stable. sent16: if the cheerer does navigate the fact that it is machine-made is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cheerer does navigate.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the cheerer is machine-made.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the chancery is both not machine-made and not a stabling.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
if the shoal is machine-made then it does hypnotize bibliotist.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the cheerer does navigate the chancery is not machine-made and it is not a kind of a stabling is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cheerer is machine-made the chancery is not machine-made but it does stable. sent2: the chancery is not machine-made if the cheerer is machine-made. sent3: if the cheerer does navigate the chancery is not machine-made. sent4: if the chancery is machine-made then that it does navigate is right. sent5: the cheerer is not machine-made and it does not stable if the chancery is machine-made. sent6: the dumps is not machine-made and not stabling if the cheerer is not machine-made. sent7: the fact that the cheerer is a stabling is not incorrect. sent8: the cheerer does hypnotize Desmidiaceae. sent9: the cheerer is non-machine-made thing that does not stable if the chancery does navigate. sent10: the cheerer does not stable and does not navigate if the chancery is machine-made. sent11: the chancery is not machine-made and is not a stabling if the cheerer is machine-made. sent12: if something is machine-made it does hypnotize bibliotist. sent13: the chancery is not machine-made. sent14: the chancery is not machine-made but it stables if the cheerer navigates. sent15: the chancery is not machine-made but it does stable. sent16: if the cheerer does navigate the fact that it is machine-made is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cheerer does navigate.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the cheerer is machine-made.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the chancery is both not machine-made and not a stabling.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__