that the company stews is not incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a ichthyosaur and it is not extraordinary is wrong. sent2: the fact that something is either not a Sargent or not a Freudian or both is wrong if it is a kind of a petiole. sent3: the fact that the company is a stew is right if the fluoroform does not miscarry humpback but it is a arachnoid. sent4: if something is resentful it does not miscarry humpback and is a arachnoid. sent5: the company is not a ichthyosaur if the fact that the humpback either is not a kind of a Sargent or is not a Freudian or both is not true. sent6: that the company is not a kind of a stew and is resentful is true if it does miscarry humpback. sent7: if something is not a ichthyosaur then that it is both extraordinary and not resentful is not right. sent8: the fluoroform is resentful if there exists something such that it is extraordinary. sent9: if that the company is a kind of a arachnoid that is resentful is not incorrect the fluoroform is a stew. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does culminate and trips skid does not hold. sent11: if that that something is extraordinary and not resentful is right is not correct then it does not stew.
sent4 -> int1: if the fluoroform is resentful then it does not miscarry humpback and is a arachnoid.;
the company does not stew.
sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the company is extraordinary thing that is not resentful does not hold it does not stew.; sent7 -> int3: the fact that the company is a kind of extraordinary thing that is unresentful is not right if it is not a kind of a ichthyosaur.; sent2 -> int4: if the humpback is a petiole the fact that it either is not a Sargent or is not a Freudian or both does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the company stews is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a ichthyosaur and it is not extraordinary is wrong. sent2: the fact that something is either not a Sargent or not a Freudian or both is wrong if it is a kind of a petiole. sent3: the fact that the company is a stew is right if the fluoroform does not miscarry humpback but it is a arachnoid. sent4: if something is resentful it does not miscarry humpback and is a arachnoid. sent5: the company is not a ichthyosaur if the fact that the humpback either is not a kind of a Sargent or is not a Freudian or both is not true. sent6: that the company is not a kind of a stew and is resentful is true if it does miscarry humpback. sent7: if something is not a ichthyosaur then that it is both extraordinary and not resentful is not right. sent8: the fluoroform is resentful if there exists something such that it is extraordinary. sent9: if that the company is a kind of a arachnoid that is resentful is not incorrect the fluoroform is a stew. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does culminate and trips skid does not hold. sent11: if that that something is extraordinary and not resentful is right is not correct then it does not stew. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the fluoroform is resentful then it does not miscarry humpback and is a arachnoid.; __UNKNOWN__