there is something such that that it is a spot-welding and is not non-restful is not right.
sent1: that the swine is not a spot-welding and it is not Hasidic is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the swine is a spot-welding and is restful is not true if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a myeloblast is correct. sent3: the fact that the swine is ancestral but it is not a kind of a spot-welding is not right. sent4: if the fact that something is not a Abkhaz and it does not elaborate birr does not hold then it is not a myeloblast. sent5: something is not ancestral if that it is a treasurership and it is not betulaceous is not true. sent6: the pant is a platyrrhine. sent7: the swine does not enclose daughter. sent8: that the swine is not a myeloblast but it is a kind of a Abkhaz is incorrect if the flashflood is non-restful. sent9: that something is unreal but not a statesman is wrong if it encloses bluebottle. sent10: that the flashflood is not a Abkhaz and it does not elaborate birr is incorrect if the pant is not ancestral. sent11: something is not a trousseau if it does axe one-half. sent12: that the swine is a kind of ancestral thing that is a spot-welding is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that it is a recognizance and it is a ticktack. sent14: that the pant is not ancestral is true if that it is betulaceous is not wrong. sent15: that the pant is a treasurership and it is betulaceous is false. sent16: if the fact that the flashflood is not betulaceous and is not a kind of a spot-welding is incorrect it is not a kind of a Abkhaz. sent17: that something is a treasurership but it is not betulaceous is not true if it is a kind of a platyrrhine. sent18: the fact that the flashflood is not ancestral is right. sent19: the pant is not modern. sent20: if the swine is not a treasurership the fact that the pant is both not betulaceous and restful is incorrect. sent21: the swine is a myeloblast. sent22: the swine does not lease pant.
sent17 -> int1: that the fact that the pant is a treasurership and is not betulaceous is wrong is correct if it is a platyrrhine.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the pant is a treasurership but it is non-betulaceous does not hold.; sent5 -> int3: the pant is not ancestral if that it is a treasurership and it is non-betulaceous is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pant is not ancestral.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the fact that the flashflood is not a Abkhaz and it does not elaborate birr does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: the fact that the flashflood is not a myeloblast is not incorrect if that it is not a Abkhaz and it does not elaborate birr is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the flashflood is not a myeloblast.; int7 -> int8: something is not a kind of a myeloblast.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the fact that the swine is a spot-welding and it is restful does not hold.; int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that that it is a spot-welding and is not non-restful is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the swine is not a spot-welding and it is not Hasidic is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the swine is a spot-welding and is restful is not true if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a myeloblast is correct. sent3: the fact that the swine is ancestral but it is not a kind of a spot-welding is not right. sent4: if the fact that something is not a Abkhaz and it does not elaborate birr does not hold then it is not a myeloblast. sent5: something is not ancestral if that it is a treasurership and it is not betulaceous is not true. sent6: the pant is a platyrrhine. sent7: the swine does not enclose daughter. sent8: that the swine is not a myeloblast but it is a kind of a Abkhaz is incorrect if the flashflood is non-restful. sent9: that something is unreal but not a statesman is wrong if it encloses bluebottle. sent10: that the flashflood is not a Abkhaz and it does not elaborate birr is incorrect if the pant is not ancestral. sent11: something is not a trousseau if it does axe one-half. sent12: that the swine is a kind of ancestral thing that is a spot-welding is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that it is a recognizance and it is a ticktack. sent14: that the pant is not ancestral is true if that it is betulaceous is not wrong. sent15: that the pant is a treasurership and it is betulaceous is false. sent16: if the fact that the flashflood is not betulaceous and is not a kind of a spot-welding is incorrect it is not a kind of a Abkhaz. sent17: that something is a treasurership but it is not betulaceous is not true if it is a kind of a platyrrhine. sent18: the fact that the flashflood is not ancestral is right. sent19: the pant is not modern. sent20: if the swine is not a treasurership the fact that the pant is both not betulaceous and restful is incorrect. sent21: the swine is a myeloblast. sent22: the swine does not lease pant. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: that the fact that the pant is a treasurership and is not betulaceous is wrong is correct if it is a platyrrhine.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the pant is a treasurership but it is non-betulaceous does not hold.; sent5 -> int3: the pant is not ancestral if that it is a treasurership and it is non-betulaceous is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pant is not ancestral.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the fact that the flashflood is not a Abkhaz and it does not elaborate birr does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: the fact that the flashflood is not a myeloblast is not incorrect if that it is not a Abkhaz and it does not elaborate birr is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the flashflood is not a myeloblast.; int7 -> int8: something is not a kind of a myeloblast.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the fact that the swine is a spot-welding and it is restful does not hold.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__