the fact that the promisee is a kind of a Tatar that does not heat Kubrick does not hold.
sent1: the fact that either something is not a kind of a Tatar or it does not sign or both is not correct if it is not reversionary. sent2: the fact that something either is not neurological or is not a slopseller or both is not correct if it is not a signing. sent3: if something is not an oblique it does not lunch harpist and it is not a kind of a pepper. sent4: the bitumen is not an oblique if the blastema does not lunch beef and is a juke. sent5: if the bitumen does lunch harpist but it does not pepper then the promisee is a Tatar. sent6: if the fact that the promisee is not non-oblique and does heat Kubrick is correct the fact that the bitumen heat Kubrick does not hold. sent7: the blastema does not lunch beef but it is a kind of a juke. sent8: if something is not a signing then it is a slopseller. sent9: the promisee is a kind of a Tatar if the fact that the bitumen does not lunch harpist and is not a pepper hold. sent10: the codpiece is reversionary and it does sign. sent11: if the codpiece is reversionary and it signs then the Walkman does not signs. sent12: if that the Walkman is not neurological and/or it is not a slopseller is incorrect the promisee does not heat Kubrick.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the bitumen is not oblique.; sent3 -> int2: if the bitumen is not an oblique it does not lunch harpist and does not pepper.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bitumen does not lunch harpist and is not a pepper.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the promisee is a kind of a Tatar.; sent2 -> int5: the fact that if the Walkman is not the signing the fact that either the Walkman is not neurological or it is not a slopseller or both is not true is true.; sent11 & sent10 -> int6: the Walkman does not sign.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the Walkman is not neurological or it is not a kind of a slopseller or both does not hold.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the promisee does not heat Kubrick.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the promisee is a kind of a Tatar that does not heat Kubrick does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that either something is not a kind of a Tatar or it does not sign or both is not correct if it is not reversionary. sent2: the fact that something either is not neurological or is not a slopseller or both is not correct if it is not a signing. sent3: if something is not an oblique it does not lunch harpist and it is not a kind of a pepper. sent4: the bitumen is not an oblique if the blastema does not lunch beef and is a juke. sent5: if the bitumen does lunch harpist but it does not pepper then the promisee is a Tatar. sent6: if the fact that the promisee is not non-oblique and does heat Kubrick is correct the fact that the bitumen heat Kubrick does not hold. sent7: the blastema does not lunch beef but it is a kind of a juke. sent8: if something is not a signing then it is a slopseller. sent9: the promisee is a kind of a Tatar if the fact that the bitumen does not lunch harpist and is not a pepper hold. sent10: the codpiece is reversionary and it does sign. sent11: if the codpiece is reversionary and it signs then the Walkman does not signs. sent12: if that the Walkman is not neurological and/or it is not a slopseller is incorrect the promisee does not heat Kubrick. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the bitumen is not oblique.; sent3 -> int2: if the bitumen is not an oblique it does not lunch harpist and does not pepper.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bitumen does not lunch harpist and is not a pepper.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the promisee is a kind of a Tatar.; sent2 -> int5: the fact that if the Walkman is not the signing the fact that either the Walkman is not neurological or it is not a slopseller or both is not true is true.; sent11 & sent10 -> int6: the Walkman does not sign.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the Walkman is not neurological or it is not a kind of a slopseller or both does not hold.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the promisee does not heat Kubrick.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__