the coeducation does not occur and the multiformness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the coeducation does not occur and the multiformness does not occur does not hold if the ignition does not occur. sent2: that the liveness happens and the hunting happens is wrong. sent3: if that the setup and the coeducation happens is wrong then the coeducation does not occur. sent4: the setup happens and the particularization occurs. sent5: that the blastomericness but not the ignition happens is not false if the feathering does not occur. sent6: that the navalness happens is prevented by that the setup and the descent occurs. sent7: if that the fact that the living happens and the hunt happens is incorrect is not false the rest does not occur. sent8: the unpredictableness does not occur if the fact that not the setup but the unpredictableness occurs is not correct. sent9: that the blastomericness occurs and the ignition does not occur leads to that the particularization does not occur. sent10: if the particularization does not occur then that that not the setup but the unpredictableness happens is true is incorrect. sent11: if the resting does not occur then the fact that both the colloguing and the clonus occurs is false. sent12: the navalness occurs but the descent does not occur if the blastomericness occurs. sent13: if the particularization does not occur that the setup and the coeducation occurs is incorrect. sent14: the multiformness does not occur if the descent occurs and the navalness occurs. sent15: that the clonus does not occur brings about that the descent occurs and the navalness occurs. sent16: the bettering fore-and-after and the navalness happens. sent17: if both the imprudentness and the weeding troop happens the papalness does not occur. sent18: the blastomericness does not occur if the fact that both the colloguing and the clonus occurs is false. sent19: the ignition does not occur if the descent does not occur and the blastomericness does not occur.
sent4 -> int1: the setup occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the descent happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the setup and the descent occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the navalness does not occur is not false.; sent16 -> int4: that the navalness occurs is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the descent does not occur.; sent7 & sent2 -> int7: that the rest does not occur is not incorrect.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: the fact that that both the colloguing and the clonus occurs is right is not true.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the blastomericness does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the descent does not occur and the blastomericness does not occur.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: the ignition does not occur.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the coeducation does not occur and the multiformness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the coeducation does not occur and the multiformness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the coeducation does not occur and the multiformness does not occur does not hold if the ignition does not occur. sent2: that the liveness happens and the hunting happens is wrong. sent3: if that the setup and the coeducation happens is wrong then the coeducation does not occur. sent4: the setup happens and the particularization occurs. sent5: that the blastomericness but not the ignition happens is not false if the feathering does not occur. sent6: that the navalness happens is prevented by that the setup and the descent occurs. sent7: if that the fact that the living happens and the hunt happens is incorrect is not false the rest does not occur. sent8: the unpredictableness does not occur if the fact that not the setup but the unpredictableness occurs is not correct. sent9: that the blastomericness occurs and the ignition does not occur leads to that the particularization does not occur. sent10: if the particularization does not occur then that that not the setup but the unpredictableness happens is true is incorrect. sent11: if the resting does not occur then the fact that both the colloguing and the clonus occurs is false. sent12: the navalness occurs but the descent does not occur if the blastomericness occurs. sent13: if the particularization does not occur that the setup and the coeducation occurs is incorrect. sent14: the multiformness does not occur if the descent occurs and the navalness occurs. sent15: that the clonus does not occur brings about that the descent occurs and the navalness occurs. sent16: the bettering fore-and-after and the navalness happens. sent17: if both the imprudentness and the weeding troop happens the papalness does not occur. sent18: the blastomericness does not occur if the fact that both the colloguing and the clonus occurs is false. sent19: the ignition does not occur if the descent does not occur and the blastomericness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the setup occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the descent happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the setup and the descent occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the navalness does not occur is not false.; sent16 -> int4: that the navalness occurs is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the descent does not occur.; sent7 & sent2 -> int7: that the rest does not occur is not incorrect.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: the fact that that both the colloguing and the clonus occurs is right is not true.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the blastomericness does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the descent does not occur and the blastomericness does not occur.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: the ignition does not occur.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__