not the paramedicalness but the rimlessness happens.
sent1: the bowdlerization does not occur but the sympatheticness happens if the multiplying secondment does not occur. sent2: the unavailableness causes that the multiplying secondment does not occur and the redoubling does not occur. sent3: if that the fact that both the non-paramedicalness and the rimlessness occurs is not incorrect does not hold then the sympatheticness occurs. sent4: if the bowdlerization does not occur then that both the non-paramedicalness and the rimlessness happens is incorrect. sent5: the fact that not the multiplying secondment but the sympatheticness happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both the non-paramedicalness and the rimlessness happens does not hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the sympatheticness happens.;
the fact that the non-paramedicalness and the rimlessness occurs is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = not the paramedicalness but the rimlessness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the bowdlerization does not occur but the sympatheticness happens if the multiplying secondment does not occur. sent2: the unavailableness causes that the multiplying secondment does not occur and the redoubling does not occur. sent3: if that the fact that both the non-paramedicalness and the rimlessness occurs is not incorrect does not hold then the sympatheticness occurs. sent4: if the bowdlerization does not occur then that both the non-paramedicalness and the rimlessness happens is incorrect. sent5: the fact that not the multiplying secondment but the sympatheticness happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both the non-paramedicalness and the rimlessness happens does not hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the sympatheticness happens.; __UNKNOWN__