the piezoelectricness does not occur.
sent1: the eliminating Guadeloupe does not occur. sent2: the descent occurs. sent3: the fact that that the eliminating Lari does not occur and the interrelating sociometry does not occur is wrong is not incorrect if the eliminating Guadeloupe does not occur. sent4: the compliantness happens and the unmaking Elamitic happens if that the descent does not occur is not false. sent5: the defibrillating neve happens. sent6: the eliminating Lari does not occur and the interrelating sociometry does not occur if the botanicness does not occur. sent7: that the eliminating Lari occurs but the interrelating sociometry does not occur is not true. sent8: both the non-biauricularness and the eliminating eleventh occurs. sent9: the indemnification happens if the tolling does not occur. sent10: both the non-on-lineness and the descent happens if the unmaking Elamitic happens. sent11: that the unmaking Elamitic happens causes that the descent happens. sent12: that the unmaking WLAN and the non-gonadotropicness occurs is false if the compliantness occurs. sent13: the gonadotropicness is prevented by that the unmaking WLAN or the compliantness or both happens. sent14: the piezoelectricness does not occur if both the non-on-lineness and the descent occurs. sent15: that the gonadotropicness does not occur prevents that the unmaking Elamitic does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the botanicness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the eliminating Lari does not occur and the interrelating sociometry does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: that the eliminating Lari does not occur and the interrelating sociometry does not occur does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the botanicness happens.;
the piezoelectricness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the piezoelectricness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the eliminating Guadeloupe does not occur. sent2: the descent occurs. sent3: the fact that that the eliminating Lari does not occur and the interrelating sociometry does not occur is wrong is not incorrect if the eliminating Guadeloupe does not occur. sent4: the compliantness happens and the unmaking Elamitic happens if that the descent does not occur is not false. sent5: the defibrillating neve happens. sent6: the eliminating Lari does not occur and the interrelating sociometry does not occur if the botanicness does not occur. sent7: that the eliminating Lari occurs but the interrelating sociometry does not occur is not true. sent8: both the non-biauricularness and the eliminating eleventh occurs. sent9: the indemnification happens if the tolling does not occur. sent10: both the non-on-lineness and the descent happens if the unmaking Elamitic happens. sent11: that the unmaking Elamitic happens causes that the descent happens. sent12: that the unmaking WLAN and the non-gonadotropicness occurs is false if the compliantness occurs. sent13: the gonadotropicness is prevented by that the unmaking WLAN or the compliantness or both happens. sent14: the piezoelectricness does not occur if both the non-on-lineness and the descent occurs. sent15: that the gonadotropicness does not occur prevents that the unmaking Elamitic does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the botanicness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the eliminating Lari does not occur and the interrelating sociometry does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: that the eliminating Lari does not occur and the interrelating sociometry does not occur does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the botanicness happens.; __UNKNOWN__