the fact that the blackface is a go-ahead is not wrong.
sent1: if the kok-saghyz limps the decumary strengthens atlas. sent2: that something does not limp and it does not strengthen atlas is incorrect if it is not zygomorphic. sent3: the paraplegic is a kind of a go-ahead if the kok-saghyz is not a go-ahead. sent4: the fact that the decumary strengthens atlas but it does not strengthen Menander does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does not consternate chipboard and is zygomorphic is not true then the decumary is not zygomorphic. sent6: if the fact that the kok-saghyz does limp is right then the paraplegic is a kind of a go-ahead. sent7: that something does limp is correct if the fact that that it does not limp and it does not strengthen atlas is correct is not true. sent8: the NADP does not consternate Ferdinand and it is not coccal. sent9: the kok-saghyz limps if the NADP is zygomorphic. sent10: if something strengthens Menander then that it does not consternate chipboard and it is zygomorphic does not hold. sent11: if something does not consternate Ferdinand and is not coccal it is zygomorphic. sent12: the blackface is not a go-ahead if the decumary does strengthen Menander.
sent11 -> int1: the NADP is zygomorphic if it does not consternate Ferdinand and it is not coccal.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the NADP is zygomorphic hold.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the kok-saghyz limps.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the decumary does strengthen atlas.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decumary does not strengthen Menander.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: that the decumary strengthens atlas and does not strengthen Menander is right.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the decumary strengthens Menander.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the paraplegic is a go-ahead.
sent10 -> int8: that the eardrum does not consternate chipboard and is zygomorphic is not true if it strengthens Menander.; sent2 -> int9: if the decumary is not zygomorphic that it does not limp and does not strengthen atlas is not right.; sent7 -> int10: if the fact that the decumary does not limp and does not strengthen atlas is incorrect it does limp.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the blackface is a go-ahead is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the kok-saghyz limps the decumary strengthens atlas. sent2: that something does not limp and it does not strengthen atlas is incorrect if it is not zygomorphic. sent3: the paraplegic is a kind of a go-ahead if the kok-saghyz is not a go-ahead. sent4: the fact that the decumary strengthens atlas but it does not strengthen Menander does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does not consternate chipboard and is zygomorphic is not true then the decumary is not zygomorphic. sent6: if the fact that the kok-saghyz does limp is right then the paraplegic is a kind of a go-ahead. sent7: that something does limp is correct if the fact that that it does not limp and it does not strengthen atlas is correct is not true. sent8: the NADP does not consternate Ferdinand and it is not coccal. sent9: the kok-saghyz limps if the NADP is zygomorphic. sent10: if something strengthens Menander then that it does not consternate chipboard and it is zygomorphic does not hold. sent11: if something does not consternate Ferdinand and is not coccal it is zygomorphic. sent12: the blackface is not a go-ahead if the decumary does strengthen Menander. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the NADP is zygomorphic if it does not consternate Ferdinand and it is not coccal.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the NADP is zygomorphic hold.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the kok-saghyz limps.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the decumary does strengthen atlas.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decumary does not strengthen Menander.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: that the decumary strengthens atlas and does not strengthen Menander is right.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the decumary strengthens Menander.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__