the fact that there exists something such that if it is not uncongenial it is karyokinetic is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a adrenalectomy it is a lustrum. sent2: if the suppressor does not hone Ull it is karyokinetic. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a schizanthus then it is a kind of a sick. sent4: the fact that the suppressor is uncongenial hold if it is not a piece. sent5: there is something such that if it is uncongenial then the fact that it is karyokinetic is true. sent6: the fact that the suppressor is uncongenial hold if it does not branch shrink-wrap. sent7: if the suppressor is not a Livermore then it is patellar. sent8: the shrink-wrap is a kind of a recipe if it is not noble. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is not lithomantic hold then it does toss courbaril. sent10: if the suppressor is not a merman it is uncongenial. sent11: something that is not karyokinetic is a kind of a schizanthus. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a CFO it does outgrow metoprolol. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not scenic it is not non-sick. sent14: if the suppressor is not a kind of a verdict then it is uncongenial. sent15: if that the suppressor is not uncongenial hold it is karyokinetic. sent16: the suppressor is karyokinetic if it is uncongenial. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a cruise it is a clinker. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not runic it is bubonic. sent19: there is something such that if it does not branch shrink-wrap then it is dysgenics.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
the Bohemian is a kind of a schizanthus if it is not karyokinetic.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not uncongenial it is karyokinetic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a adrenalectomy it is a lustrum. sent2: if the suppressor does not hone Ull it is karyokinetic. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a schizanthus then it is a kind of a sick. sent4: the fact that the suppressor is uncongenial hold if it is not a piece. sent5: there is something such that if it is uncongenial then the fact that it is karyokinetic is true. sent6: the fact that the suppressor is uncongenial hold if it does not branch shrink-wrap. sent7: if the suppressor is not a Livermore then it is patellar. sent8: the shrink-wrap is a kind of a recipe if it is not noble. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is not lithomantic hold then it does toss courbaril. sent10: if the suppressor is not a merman it is uncongenial. sent11: something that is not karyokinetic is a kind of a schizanthus. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a CFO it does outgrow metoprolol. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not scenic it is not non-sick. sent14: if the suppressor is not a kind of a verdict then it is uncongenial. sent15: if that the suppressor is not uncongenial hold it is karyokinetic. sent16: the suppressor is karyokinetic if it is uncongenial. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a cruise it is a clinker. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not runic it is bubonic. sent19: there is something such that if it does not branch shrink-wrap then it is dysgenics. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__