there exists something such that if it does not glamorize it is a valetudinarian.
sent1: if the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is not ataxic and it does not glamorize is not true is correct the oiler does glamorize. sent2: that the castaway is not unfit is right. sent3: the castaway downs conception. sent4: the strongman does down conception if the castaway is fit thing that does glamorize. sent5: if that something either does not down conception or is not unfit or both is incorrect it is not chromatographic. sent6: if the castaway is a kind of non-chromatographic thing that downs conception then the fact that the strongman is unfit is not false. sent7: something is not a communicativeness but it is a amnion if it is not chromatographic. sent8: the castaway is not chromatographic. sent9: the strongman is not a up-tick. sent10: that the fact that something is non-ataxic thing that does not glamorize is true is false if it is a valetudinarian. sent11: the castaway is not a valetudinarian. sent12: The conception downs castaway. sent13: if that the strongman is not a valetudinarian and is dental hold then the castaway is a valetudinarian. sent14: something that does not glamorize and is unfit is a valetudinarian. sent15: if something does glamorize the fact that it does not down conception or is not unfit or both does not hold.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the castaway is non-chromatographic thing that downs conception.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the strongman is unfit.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the strongman does not glamorize.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the strongman does not glamorize but it is unfit.; sent14 -> int4: if the strongman does not glamorize but it is unfit it is a valetudinarian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the strongman is a valetudinarian.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the strongman does not glamorize then it is a kind of a valetudinarian.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the oiler is not a communicativeness and is a amnion.
sent7 -> int7: the oiler is not a kind of a communicativeness but it is a amnion if it is not chromatographic.; sent5 -> int8: if the fact that the oiler does not down conception or is not unfit or both is false then it is not chromatographic.; sent15 -> int9: if the oiler glamorizes that it either does not down conception or is not unfit or both is false.; sent10 -> int10: if the castaway is a kind of a valetudinarian then the fact that it is not ataxic and it does not glamorize is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not glamorize it is a valetudinarian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is not ataxic and it does not glamorize is not true is correct the oiler does glamorize. sent2: that the castaway is not unfit is right. sent3: the castaway downs conception. sent4: the strongman does down conception if the castaway is fit thing that does glamorize. sent5: if that something either does not down conception or is not unfit or both is incorrect it is not chromatographic. sent6: if the castaway is a kind of non-chromatographic thing that downs conception then the fact that the strongman is unfit is not false. sent7: something is not a communicativeness but it is a amnion if it is not chromatographic. sent8: the castaway is not chromatographic. sent9: the strongman is not a up-tick. sent10: that the fact that something is non-ataxic thing that does not glamorize is true is false if it is a valetudinarian. sent11: the castaway is not a valetudinarian. sent12: The conception downs castaway. sent13: if that the strongman is not a valetudinarian and is dental hold then the castaway is a valetudinarian. sent14: something that does not glamorize and is unfit is a valetudinarian. sent15: if something does glamorize the fact that it does not down conception or is not unfit or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the castaway is non-chromatographic thing that downs conception.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the strongman is unfit.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the strongman does not glamorize.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the strongman does not glamorize but it is unfit.; sent14 -> int4: if the strongman does not glamorize but it is unfit it is a valetudinarian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the strongman is a valetudinarian.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the strongman does not glamorize then it is a kind of a valetudinarian.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__