the introversion is not an ink.
sent1: if there is something such that it is not gloveless that the cigarfish is not a boy but it is a conceptualism is false. sent2: there exists something such that it shivers. sent3: the cigarfish is not a kind of a conceptualism. sent4: the introversion is gloveless if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a conceptualism and inks is not right. sent5: that the dogcart is sisterly and does stint barrelhouse is not correct. sent6: the ilmenite is not a boy. sent7: something does not howl anguish but it howls tobacco. sent8: that the introversion is gloveless a golfing is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that that it does wrestle crew and does stint operation is not right. sent10: the introversion inks if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a boy and is gloveless is false. sent11: if there are non-gloveless things then the introversion is an ink. sent12: either the introversion is a Elaphurus or it is not a boy or both if something is not a fruitage. sent13: the fact that the dogcart does ink is not false if there exists something such that that it is both not gloveless and a boy is false. sent14: there is something such that that it is naive and a fruitage does not hold. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is naive and it is a kind of a fruitage is incorrect the dogcart is not a fruitage. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is a plumule and it does wrestle introversion is wrong. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a conceptualism the fact that the cigarfish is gloveless and it inks does not hold. sent18: the fact that the dogcart is not a kind of a boy but it is gloveless does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a conceptualism. sent19: a non-gloveless thing is not an ink and is a kind of a conceptualism.
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a conceptualism.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the dogcart is not a boy and is gloveless does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a boy and it is gloveless is incorrect.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the introversion is not an ink.
sent19 -> int4: the introversion is not a kind of an ink but it is a conceptualism if it is not gloveless.; sent14 & sent15 -> int5: the dogcart is not a kind of a fruitage.; int5 -> int6: something is not a fruitage.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the introversion is either a Elaphurus or not a boy or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the introversion is not an ink. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not gloveless that the cigarfish is not a boy but it is a conceptualism is false. sent2: there exists something such that it shivers. sent3: the cigarfish is not a kind of a conceptualism. sent4: the introversion is gloveless if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a conceptualism and inks is not right. sent5: that the dogcart is sisterly and does stint barrelhouse is not correct. sent6: the ilmenite is not a boy. sent7: something does not howl anguish but it howls tobacco. sent8: that the introversion is gloveless a golfing is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that that it does wrestle crew and does stint operation is not right. sent10: the introversion inks if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a boy and is gloveless is false. sent11: if there are non-gloveless things then the introversion is an ink. sent12: either the introversion is a Elaphurus or it is not a boy or both if something is not a fruitage. sent13: the fact that the dogcart does ink is not false if there exists something such that that it is both not gloveless and a boy is false. sent14: there is something such that that it is naive and a fruitage does not hold. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is naive and it is a kind of a fruitage is incorrect the dogcart is not a fruitage. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is a plumule and it does wrestle introversion is wrong. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a conceptualism the fact that the cigarfish is gloveless and it inks does not hold. sent18: the fact that the dogcart is not a kind of a boy but it is gloveless does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a conceptualism. sent19: a non-gloveless thing is not an ink and is a kind of a conceptualism. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a conceptualism.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the dogcart is not a boy and is gloveless does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a boy and it is gloveless is incorrect.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__