that the fact that there is something such that if it is a modernity that it is not Christological and it is a curb does not hold is not false is not correct.
sent1: the Creek is a modernity if there is something such that the fact that it is not a modernity and it is a screen is not true. sent2: if the grotesque is a kind of non-Christological thing that curbs then it is a kind of a modernity. sent3: there is something such that if it is extensile then the fact that it tames broadtail and is logistics is wrong. sent4: that the seesaw is not Christological is not incorrect. sent5: if something is not a iodothyronine the fact that it is not a kind of a modernity and does screen is not true. sent6: the Creek shrinks blockhouse and it is a karat. sent7: if the grotesque is non-Christological a curb it is not a modernity. sent8: the grotesque does not murmur Aepyornidae but it is not non-Christological if it does ding lavender. sent9: the affiliate is not a iodothyronine. sent10: if the grotesque is a modernity and is laryngeal then the fact that it is not mature is correct. sent11: the Cologne does not murmur preserved if something is a modernity and it shrinks blockhouse.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the grotesque is not Christological and is a curb.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the grotesque is not a kind of a modernity.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the grotesque is a kind of a modernity is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the grotesque is not Christological and does curb is not true is not false.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that if the grotesque is the modernity the fact that the grotesque is not Christological and curbs does not hold is not false.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the grotesque is not Voltarian.
sent5 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the affiliate is not a modernity but the screen is not correct if the affiliate is not a iodothyronine hold.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: that the affiliate is not a modernity and is a screen is false.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is not a modernity but a screen is not correct.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: that the Creek is a kind of a modernity is true.; sent6 -> int9: the Creek does shrink blockhouse.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the Creek is a kind of a modernity and it does shrink blockhouse.; int10 -> int11: something is a modernity and it shrinks blockhouse.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: that the Cologne does not murmur preserved is not wrong.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does not murmur preserved.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that there is something such that if it is a modernity that it is not Christological and it is a curb does not hold is not false is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Creek is a modernity if there is something such that the fact that it is not a modernity and it is a screen is not true. sent2: if the grotesque is a kind of non-Christological thing that curbs then it is a kind of a modernity. sent3: there is something such that if it is extensile then the fact that it tames broadtail and is logistics is wrong. sent4: that the seesaw is not Christological is not incorrect. sent5: if something is not a iodothyronine the fact that it is not a kind of a modernity and does screen is not true. sent6: the Creek shrinks blockhouse and it is a karat. sent7: if the grotesque is non-Christological a curb it is not a modernity. sent8: the grotesque does not murmur Aepyornidae but it is not non-Christological if it does ding lavender. sent9: the affiliate is not a iodothyronine. sent10: if the grotesque is a modernity and is laryngeal then the fact that it is not mature is correct. sent11: the Cologne does not murmur preserved if something is a modernity and it shrinks blockhouse. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the grotesque is not Christological and is a curb.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the grotesque is not a kind of a modernity.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the grotesque is a kind of a modernity is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the grotesque is not Christological and does curb is not true is not false.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that if the grotesque is the modernity the fact that the grotesque is not Christological and curbs does not hold is not false.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__