the cathecticness does not occur.
sent1: the garlickiness and/or the belch happens if the evergreen does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the suborbitalness does not occur but the fashionableness occurs does not hold the butterfly occurs. sent3: the fact that both the suborbitalness and the fashionableness occurs is not correct. sent4: both the non-demographicness and the non-cathecticness occurs if the fact that the butterflying happens is right. sent5: the fact that the non-suborbitalness and the fashionableness happens is not true if the fact that the tingeing cosmolatry does not occur hold. sent6: the demographic does not occur. sent7: that both the suborbitalness and the fashionableness happens does not hold if the tingeing cosmolatry does not occur. sent8: if the monovalentness happens then the garlickiness occurs. sent9: both the excitableness and the pontificating happens. sent10: the fact that either the garlickiness does not occur or the belch happens or both is incorrect if the monovalentness happens. sent11: that the tingeing cosmolatry does not occur is brought about by that both the evergreen and the excitableness happens. sent12: the pontificating occurs. sent13: the fact that the tingeing Oken does not occur and the brachiopod happens is not correct. sent14: the garlickiness happens. sent15: the butterflying happens if the suborbitalness occurs. sent16: the garlickiness occurs and/or the belch occurs. sent17: if the butterfly happens the demographic does not occur. sent18: the non-excitableness yields that the evergreen and the cathecticness occurs. sent19: if the evergreenness does not occur then the garlickiness does not occur or the belch happens or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the evergreenness does not occur.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the non-garlickyness or the belch or both happens.; sent9 -> int2: the excitableness occurs.;
the cathecticness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the cathecticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the garlickiness and/or the belch happens if the evergreen does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the suborbitalness does not occur but the fashionableness occurs does not hold the butterfly occurs. sent3: the fact that both the suborbitalness and the fashionableness occurs is not correct. sent4: both the non-demographicness and the non-cathecticness occurs if the fact that the butterflying happens is right. sent5: the fact that the non-suborbitalness and the fashionableness happens is not true if the fact that the tingeing cosmolatry does not occur hold. sent6: the demographic does not occur. sent7: that both the suborbitalness and the fashionableness happens does not hold if the tingeing cosmolatry does not occur. sent8: if the monovalentness happens then the garlickiness occurs. sent9: both the excitableness and the pontificating happens. sent10: the fact that either the garlickiness does not occur or the belch happens or both is incorrect if the monovalentness happens. sent11: that the tingeing cosmolatry does not occur is brought about by that both the evergreen and the excitableness happens. sent12: the pontificating occurs. sent13: the fact that the tingeing Oken does not occur and the brachiopod happens is not correct. sent14: the garlickiness happens. sent15: the butterflying happens if the suborbitalness occurs. sent16: the garlickiness occurs and/or the belch occurs. sent17: if the butterfly happens the demographic does not occur. sent18: the non-excitableness yields that the evergreen and the cathecticness occurs. sent19: if the evergreenness does not occur then the garlickiness does not occur or the belch happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the evergreenness does not occur.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the non-garlickyness or the belch or both happens.; sent9 -> int2: the excitableness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__