the denaturant is not covalent.
sent1: that the stole does not covet and is not libidinal is not incorrect. sent2: if the harmonium is linear that it does not open and it does not blemish parisology is not right. sent3: the denaturant does abjure mummification. sent4: that the mangel-wurzel does not abjure mummification and/or it does blemish parisology is wrong if the ribald does not blemish Hemipteronatus. sent5: if there exists something such that that it does not abjure mummification or it blemishes parisology or both does not hold then the harmonium does not open. sent6: that the chicle is not intractable but it is earthy is incorrect. sent7: if something is non-earthy then the harmonium is linear. sent8: if something that does not covet is not libidinal the ribald is not a soberness. sent9: something does not blemish Hemipteronatus if it is not a soberness. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-intractable thing that is earthy is not right then that the harmonium is linear hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that that it is intractable thing that is not non-earthy hold does not hold. sent12: if the harmonium opens then it does not abjure mummification. sent13: there is something such that it is not intractable and is earthy. sent14: if that the harmonium is not an open and does not blemish parisology is incorrect then it does not abjure mummification. sent15: the denaturant is a kind of covalent thing that does abjure mummification if the harmonium does not abjure mummification. sent16: if something does not open then the fact that it is not non-covalent and it is not linear is not correct.
sent6 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not intractable and is earthy does not hold.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the harmonium is linear.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the harmonium is not open and it does not blemish parisology is not correct.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the harmonium does not abjure mummification is true.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the denaturant is covalent and it does abjure mummification.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the denaturant is non-covalent.
sent16 -> int6: if the fact that the harmonium is not an open is right the fact that it is covalent and it is not linear is not right.; sent9 -> int7: if that the ribald is not a soberness is not incorrect it does not blemish Hemipteronatus.; sent1 -> int8: something does not covet and it is not libidinal.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the ribald is not a kind of a soberness.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the ribald does not blemish Hemipteronatus.; sent4 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the mangel-wurzel does not abjure mummification or it blemishes parisology or both does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that that it either does not abjure mummification or blemishes parisology or both is true is not right.; int12 & sent5 -> int13: the harmonium is non-open.; int6 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the harmonium is covalent and is nonlinear is not correct.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that the fact that it is covalent and it is not linear is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the denaturant is not covalent. ; $context$ = sent1: that the stole does not covet and is not libidinal is not incorrect. sent2: if the harmonium is linear that it does not open and it does not blemish parisology is not right. sent3: the denaturant does abjure mummification. sent4: that the mangel-wurzel does not abjure mummification and/or it does blemish parisology is wrong if the ribald does not blemish Hemipteronatus. sent5: if there exists something such that that it does not abjure mummification or it blemishes parisology or both does not hold then the harmonium does not open. sent6: that the chicle is not intractable but it is earthy is incorrect. sent7: if something is non-earthy then the harmonium is linear. sent8: if something that does not covet is not libidinal the ribald is not a soberness. sent9: something does not blemish Hemipteronatus if it is not a soberness. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-intractable thing that is earthy is not right then that the harmonium is linear hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that that it is intractable thing that is not non-earthy hold does not hold. sent12: if the harmonium opens then it does not abjure mummification. sent13: there is something such that it is not intractable and is earthy. sent14: if that the harmonium is not an open and does not blemish parisology is incorrect then it does not abjure mummification. sent15: the denaturant is a kind of covalent thing that does abjure mummification if the harmonium does not abjure mummification. sent16: if something does not open then the fact that it is not non-covalent and it is not linear is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not intractable and is earthy does not hold.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the harmonium is linear.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the harmonium is not open and it does not blemish parisology is not correct.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the harmonium does not abjure mummification is true.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the denaturant is covalent and it does abjure mummification.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__