the fact that the cowardliness does not occur is correct.
sent1: the syllogizing feverfew does not occur and the blowout does not occur if the pacification does not occur. sent2: the radialness does not occur if the pacification and the leveraging occurs. sent3: if that the leveraging happens hold the fact that the pacification does not occur and the cowardliness does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the overflight does not occur and/or the Palestinian happens is not true. sent5: the remonstrating Pedionomus does not occur but the uncovering occurs. sent6: if the badminton does not occur the carpetbagness does not occur. sent7: if the remonstrating Pedionomus does not occur and the uncovering happens the fact that the theming horsewhipping occurs is not false. sent8: if the leveraging does not occur then either the overflight does not occur or the Palestinian occurs or both. sent9: if the overflight happens that the Palestinian happens but the theming horsewhipping does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the fact that the Palestinian occurs and the theming horsewhipping does not occur is not true the Palestinian does not occur. sent11: that the cowardliness does not occur is triggered by that the pacification and the theming horsewhipping happens. sent12: that the leveraging happens is prevented by that the syllogizing feverfew does not occur and the blowout does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pacification does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the syllogizing feverfew does not occur and the blowout does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the leverage does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the overflight does not occur or the Palestinianness occurs or both.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the pacification occurs.; sent7 & sent5 -> int6: the theming horsewhipping occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the pacification occurs and the theming horsewhipping happens.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the cowardliness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cowardliness does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the syllogizing feverfew does not occur and the blowout does not occur if the pacification does not occur. sent2: the radialness does not occur if the pacification and the leveraging occurs. sent3: if that the leveraging happens hold the fact that the pacification does not occur and the cowardliness does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the overflight does not occur and/or the Palestinian happens is not true. sent5: the remonstrating Pedionomus does not occur but the uncovering occurs. sent6: if the badminton does not occur the carpetbagness does not occur. sent7: if the remonstrating Pedionomus does not occur and the uncovering happens the fact that the theming horsewhipping occurs is not false. sent8: if the leveraging does not occur then either the overflight does not occur or the Palestinian occurs or both. sent9: if the overflight happens that the Palestinian happens but the theming horsewhipping does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the fact that the Palestinian occurs and the theming horsewhipping does not occur is not true the Palestinian does not occur. sent11: that the cowardliness does not occur is triggered by that the pacification and the theming horsewhipping happens. sent12: that the leveraging happens is prevented by that the syllogizing feverfew does not occur and the blowout does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pacification does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the syllogizing feverfew does not occur and the blowout does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the leverage does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the overflight does not occur or the Palestinianness occurs or both.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the pacification occurs.; sent7 & sent5 -> int6: the theming horsewhipping occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the pacification occurs and the theming horsewhipping happens.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__