there exists something such that it does seep isthmus and is a Ochoa.
sent1: the isthmus is not a Edwardian. sent2: if the artiste is not non-antigenic then that the isthmus is zoonotic is not false. sent3: the isthmus is non-antigenic thing that is not a glycerol if it is not a Edwardian. sent4: the windfall is a Ochoa if the artiste is Afghani. sent5: if something sags scoter then it is a kind of a Edwardian. sent6: the artiste is a Serkin and it is a borax. sent7: the artiste is Afghani if it is zoonotic. sent8: the windfall seeps isthmus if something that is not antigenic is not a kind of a glycerol. sent9: the Poivrade is not an inconstancy if it is not a jumper.
sent6 -> int1: the artiste is a borax.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: the isthmus is not antigenic and it is not a glycerol.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not antigenic and is not a glycerol is not wrong.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the windfall does seep isthmus.;
the packing is Edwardian if it sags scoter.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does seep isthmus and is a Ochoa. ; $context$ = sent1: the isthmus is not a Edwardian. sent2: if the artiste is not non-antigenic then that the isthmus is zoonotic is not false. sent3: the isthmus is non-antigenic thing that is not a glycerol if it is not a Edwardian. sent4: the windfall is a Ochoa if the artiste is Afghani. sent5: if something sags scoter then it is a kind of a Edwardian. sent6: the artiste is a Serkin and it is a borax. sent7: the artiste is Afghani if it is zoonotic. sent8: the windfall seeps isthmus if something that is not antigenic is not a kind of a glycerol. sent9: the Poivrade is not an inconstancy if it is not a jumper. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the artiste is a borax.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: the isthmus is not antigenic and it is not a glycerol.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not antigenic and is not a glycerol is not wrong.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the windfall does seep isthmus.; __UNKNOWN__