the findings is splashy.
sent1: the Monitor is a kind of a cross and it is brachial. sent2: the findings is not a kind of a eponym if the transaminase is not splashy but it is not non-cinerary. sent3: if something is not nonviolent then either it is a hypoparathyroidism or it is axonal or both. sent4: if something is a kind of a hypoparathyroidism then the fact that it is splashy is not incorrect. sent5: the transaminase is not nonviolent if something is non-liturgical thing that is a Handel. sent6: there exists something such that that it punishes mound is right. sent7: the findings is splashy if the transaminase is splashy. sent8: that if something does not pass Galbraith and it does not decant then it is not liturgical is true. sent9: that the findings is not cinerary is not incorrect. sent10: that the transaminase is not a eponym is right. sent11: if the Monitor is brachial then the kaffiyeh does not pass Galbraith and it does not decant. sent12: if the transaminase is not a eponym and is cinerary the findings is not splashy. sent13: the transaminase is not a kind of a eponym and is cinerary. sent14: the transaminase is not a eponym if the findings is not splashy and is cinerary. sent15: if something does punish mound the kaffiyeh is a Handel and is not an immunization. sent16: the findings is not splashy if the transaminase is a kind of a eponym that is cinerary.
sent12 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the findings is splashy is true.
sent3 -> int1: if the transaminase is not nonviolent then it is a hypoparathyroidism and/or is axonal.; sent8 -> int2: the kaffiyeh is not liturgical if it does not pass Galbraith and does not decant.; sent1 -> int3: the Monitor is brachial.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: the kaffiyeh does not pass Galbraith and does not decant.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the kaffiyeh is non-liturgical.; sent6 & sent15 -> int6: the kaffiyeh is a Handel but it is not a kind of an immunization.; int6 -> int7: the kaffiyeh is a Handel.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the kaffiyeh is not liturgical and is a Handel.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not liturgical but a Handel.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the transaminase is not nonviolent.; int1 & int10 -> int11: the transaminase is a hypoparathyroidism and/or is axonal.; sent4 -> int12: the transaminase is splashy if it is a hypoparathyroidism.;
$hypothesis$ = the findings is splashy. ; $context$ = sent1: the Monitor is a kind of a cross and it is brachial. sent2: the findings is not a kind of a eponym if the transaminase is not splashy but it is not non-cinerary. sent3: if something is not nonviolent then either it is a hypoparathyroidism or it is axonal or both. sent4: if something is a kind of a hypoparathyroidism then the fact that it is splashy is not incorrect. sent5: the transaminase is not nonviolent if something is non-liturgical thing that is a Handel. sent6: there exists something such that that it punishes mound is right. sent7: the findings is splashy if the transaminase is splashy. sent8: that if something does not pass Galbraith and it does not decant then it is not liturgical is true. sent9: that the findings is not cinerary is not incorrect. sent10: that the transaminase is not a eponym is right. sent11: if the Monitor is brachial then the kaffiyeh does not pass Galbraith and it does not decant. sent12: if the transaminase is not a eponym and is cinerary the findings is not splashy. sent13: the transaminase is not a kind of a eponym and is cinerary. sent14: the transaminase is not a eponym if the findings is not splashy and is cinerary. sent15: if something does punish mound the kaffiyeh is a Handel and is not an immunization. sent16: the findings is not splashy if the transaminase is a kind of a eponym that is cinerary. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__