that if the heliocentricness does not occur then the homeopathicness does not occur but the skid occurs does not hold.
sent1: the dramaticness occurs. sent2: if the fracturing bugged does not occur then the homeopathicness does not occur. sent3: if that the fracturing bugged happens is not incorrect then the heliocentricness happens. sent4: the skid occurs if the fact that the dramaticness happens is not incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fracturing bugged occurs.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the heliocentricness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heliocentricness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fracturing bugged does not occur.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the homeopathicness does not occur is not wrong.; sent4 & sent1 -> int5: the skidding happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the non-homeopathicness and the skidding happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the heliocentricness does not occur then the homeopathicness does not occur but the skid occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the dramaticness occurs. sent2: if the fracturing bugged does not occur then the homeopathicness does not occur. sent3: if that the fracturing bugged happens is not incorrect then the heliocentricness happens. sent4: the skid occurs if the fact that the dramaticness happens is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fracturing bugged occurs.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the heliocentricness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heliocentricness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fracturing bugged does not occur.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the homeopathicness does not occur is not wrong.; sent4 & sent1 -> int5: the skidding happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the non-homeopathicness and the skidding happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__