that the room does not excuse is true if the cymbid is putrid.
sent1: there are non-Cyprian things. sent2: if the spirometer is a septet and is not small that the cymbid does not crook Sayda hold. sent3: if the room is not a pikestaff but it is ametabolic then it excuses. sent4: if something is not a Malthusianism then that the spirometer is a septet is correct. sent5: if something is allogamous the room is ametabolic. sent6: the cymbid is ametabolic thing that is not a kind of a small if there is something such that it is not allogamous. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a Malthusianism. sent8: something that does not crook Sayda and is putrid is allogamous. sent9: the spirometer is renewable but it does not crook Sayda. sent10: the cymbid is a septet. sent11: the pallasite is a fire-on-the-mountain but it does not crook amiodarone. sent12: something is a kind of a kittee. sent13: if the room does not crook Sayda but it is a small then it is an excuse. sent14: the fact that if the room is not the pikestaff but ametabolic the room does not excuse is not incorrect. sent15: the room excuses if the cymbid is putrid. sent16: the spirometer is both a septet and not small if there is something such that it is not a Malthusianism. sent17: the spirometer is a Malthusianism. sent18: the room is not a kind of a septet but it does excuse if there exists something such that it is a small. sent19: if something that is not small is allogamous then it excuses. sent20: the cymbid is not a small if the spirometer does crook Sayda. sent21: the room is a kind of an excuse. sent22: the fact that the spirometer is a septet is not wrong. sent23: if something is allogamous the room is both not a pikestaff and ametabolic. sent24: if there exists something such that it does not crook Sayda the cymbid is a septet and not small.
sent7 & sent16 -> int1: the spirometer is a septet that is not a small.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the cymbid does not crook Sayda.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cymbid is putrid.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the cymbid does not crook Sayda and is putrid.; sent8 -> int4: if the cymbid does not crook Sayda but it is putrid then it is allogamous.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cymbid is allogamous.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is allogamous.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: the room is not a kind of a pikestaff but it is ametabolic.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the room is not an excuse.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the room does not excuse is true if the cymbid is putrid. ; $context$ = sent1: there are non-Cyprian things. sent2: if the spirometer is a septet and is not small that the cymbid does not crook Sayda hold. sent3: if the room is not a pikestaff but it is ametabolic then it excuses. sent4: if something is not a Malthusianism then that the spirometer is a septet is correct. sent5: if something is allogamous the room is ametabolic. sent6: the cymbid is ametabolic thing that is not a kind of a small if there is something such that it is not allogamous. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a Malthusianism. sent8: something that does not crook Sayda and is putrid is allogamous. sent9: the spirometer is renewable but it does not crook Sayda. sent10: the cymbid is a septet. sent11: the pallasite is a fire-on-the-mountain but it does not crook amiodarone. sent12: something is a kind of a kittee. sent13: if the room does not crook Sayda but it is a small then it is an excuse. sent14: the fact that if the room is not the pikestaff but ametabolic the room does not excuse is not incorrect. sent15: the room excuses if the cymbid is putrid. sent16: the spirometer is both a septet and not small if there is something such that it is not a Malthusianism. sent17: the spirometer is a Malthusianism. sent18: the room is not a kind of a septet but it does excuse if there exists something such that it is a small. sent19: if something that is not small is allogamous then it excuses. sent20: the cymbid is not a small if the spirometer does crook Sayda. sent21: the room is a kind of an excuse. sent22: the fact that the spirometer is a septet is not wrong. sent23: if something is allogamous the room is both not a pikestaff and ametabolic. sent24: if there exists something such that it does not crook Sayda the cymbid is a septet and not small. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent16 -> int1: the spirometer is a septet that is not a small.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the cymbid does not crook Sayda.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cymbid is putrid.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the cymbid does not crook Sayda and is putrid.; sent8 -> int4: if the cymbid does not crook Sayda but it is putrid then it is allogamous.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cymbid is allogamous.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is allogamous.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: the room is not a kind of a pikestaff but it is ametabolic.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the room is not an excuse.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__