the fact that the fishbowl is not a cross-classification but it is a telpher does not hold.
sent1: if the wardress is not a kind of a telpher and it is not comfortable then the fishbowl is a telpher. sent2: the fishbowl does not confine dreamed. sent3: the fishbowl is not a funds. sent4: that the wardress is a kind of non-annalistic thing that is a V-day is incorrect if it is a hatpin. sent5: if the wardress is a telpher but it is not comfortable the fishbowl is a telpher. sent6: the fact that the fishbowl does not sideline margay and is not a funds does not hold if it does not confine dreamed. sent7: the wardress does not sideline margay and is a V-day. sent8: that the scanner is a cross-classification is not wrong. sent9: the wardress is not a kind of a telpher. sent10: that the fishbowl does not sideline margay but it does fund is not right. sent11: if the wardress is not a V-day it does confine IMU. sent12: if something does not contemn phoneme then that it does not crisscross and it is not a cross-classification is not correct. sent13: the wardress is not a kind of a cross-classification if it is comfortable. sent14: the fishbowl is not a funds if it is not a somniloquy. sent15: the fishbowl does not sideline margay and it is not a funds if it is not a kind of a somniloquy. sent16: the wardress is a kind of a hatpin. sent17: The dreamed does not confine fishbowl. sent18: if the fact that the wardress is not annalistic but it is a V-day is wrong it confines IMU. sent19: the wardress is a cross-classification if the margay is a somniloquy. sent20: if the wardress confines IMU it is not a telpher and it is not comfortable. sent21: if the wardress does not ridicule Khachaturian then that it is not hydrostatics and it is not a kind of a hatpin is not correct. sent22: if that the collage is loyal is not wrong it does not ridicule radicalism. sent23: the fishbowl is not a kind of a cross-classification if it is a somniloquy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fishbowl is not a kind of a somniloquy.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fishbowl does not sideline margay and it is not a funds.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the fishbowl does not sideline margay and is not a funds does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fishbowl is a kind of a somniloquy.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the fishbowl is not a kind of a cross-classification.; sent4 & sent16 -> int6: the fact that the wardress is not annalistic but it is a kind of a V-day is incorrect.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the wardress does confine IMU.; sent20 & int7 -> int8: the wardress is not a telpher and is not comfortable.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the fishbowl is a telpher.; int5 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the fishbowl is not a cross-classification and is a telpher is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fishbowl is not a cross-classification but it is a telpher does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wardress is not a kind of a telpher and it is not comfortable then the fishbowl is a telpher. sent2: the fishbowl does not confine dreamed. sent3: the fishbowl is not a funds. sent4: that the wardress is a kind of non-annalistic thing that is a V-day is incorrect if it is a hatpin. sent5: if the wardress is a telpher but it is not comfortable the fishbowl is a telpher. sent6: the fact that the fishbowl does not sideline margay and is not a funds does not hold if it does not confine dreamed. sent7: the wardress does not sideline margay and is a V-day. sent8: that the scanner is a cross-classification is not wrong. sent9: the wardress is not a kind of a telpher. sent10: that the fishbowl does not sideline margay but it does fund is not right. sent11: if the wardress is not a V-day it does confine IMU. sent12: if something does not contemn phoneme then that it does not crisscross and it is not a cross-classification is not correct. sent13: the wardress is not a kind of a cross-classification if it is comfortable. sent14: the fishbowl is not a funds if it is not a somniloquy. sent15: the fishbowl does not sideline margay and it is not a funds if it is not a kind of a somniloquy. sent16: the wardress is a kind of a hatpin. sent17: The dreamed does not confine fishbowl. sent18: if the fact that the wardress is not annalistic but it is a V-day is wrong it confines IMU. sent19: the wardress is a cross-classification if the margay is a somniloquy. sent20: if the wardress confines IMU it is not a telpher and it is not comfortable. sent21: if the wardress does not ridicule Khachaturian then that it is not hydrostatics and it is not a kind of a hatpin is not correct. sent22: if that the collage is loyal is not wrong it does not ridicule radicalism. sent23: the fishbowl is not a kind of a cross-classification if it is a somniloquy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fishbowl is not a kind of a somniloquy.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fishbowl does not sideline margay and it is not a funds.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the fishbowl does not sideline margay and is not a funds does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fishbowl is a kind of a somniloquy.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the fishbowl is not a kind of a cross-classification.; sent4 & sent16 -> int6: the fact that the wardress is not annalistic but it is a kind of a V-day is incorrect.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the wardress does confine IMU.; sent20 & int7 -> int8: the wardress is not a telpher and is not comfortable.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the fishbowl is a telpher.; int5 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__