that there exists something such that if that it honeys whiptail is not false then that it is perishable or it does honey peanuts or both is not true is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if it honeys whiptail it is not imperishable or honeys peanuts or both. sent2: if the fact that the peanuts does not honey whiptail is not correct it is imperishable. sent3: there is something such that if it does honey whiptail then the fact that it is imperishable and/or it does honey peanuts is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it is expressible then that it is not ritualistic and/or it is a kind of a di-iodotyrosine does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is surficial then the fact that either it is not pianistic or it is a kind of a Californian or both is not correct. sent6: if the peanuts does honey whiptail then the fact that the fact that it is not imperishable or it honeys peanuts or both is not false is incorrect. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a muishond then that it is not nacreous and/or it is transdermal is not right. sent8: there is something such that if that it is pianistic hold then that it does not torture four-poster and/or does flash is not right. sent9: there is something such that if it is licit then that it is either not a prickleback or a Yazoo or both is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it does honey whiptail then it is imperishable. sent11: if the peanuts does honey whiptail either it is not imperishable or it honeys peanuts or both. sent12: there is something such that if it is Bulgarian that it is not a microgametophyte or it is conic or both does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it does honey whiptail then it does not honey peanuts. sent14: if the peanuts is an undercarriage that either it is not an adverbial or it does honey peanuts or both is false.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it honeys whiptail is not false then that it is perishable or it does honey peanuts or both is not true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it honeys whiptail it is not imperishable or honeys peanuts or both. sent2: if the fact that the peanuts does not honey whiptail is not correct it is imperishable. sent3: there is something such that if it does honey whiptail then the fact that it is imperishable and/or it does honey peanuts is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it is expressible then that it is not ritualistic and/or it is a kind of a di-iodotyrosine does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is surficial then the fact that either it is not pianistic or it is a kind of a Californian or both is not correct. sent6: if the peanuts does honey whiptail then the fact that the fact that it is not imperishable or it honeys peanuts or both is not false is incorrect. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a muishond then that it is not nacreous and/or it is transdermal is not right. sent8: there is something such that if that it is pianistic hold then that it does not torture four-poster and/or does flash is not right. sent9: there is something such that if it is licit then that it is either not a prickleback or a Yazoo or both is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it does honey whiptail then it is imperishable. sent11: if the peanuts does honey whiptail either it is not imperishable or it honeys peanuts or both. sent12: there is something such that if it is Bulgarian that it is not a microgametophyte or it is conic or both does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it does honey whiptail then it does not honey peanuts. sent14: if the peanuts is an undercarriage that either it is not an adverbial or it does honey peanuts or both is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__