that the undynamicness happens triggers that both the non-pleomorphicness and the non-angiocarpicness occurs.
sent1: the non-angiocarpicness and the phoneticsness occurs. sent2: that the undynamicness does not occur is correct if that the processing diplomacy but not the pleomorphicness happens is not correct. sent3: the phoneticsness occurs. sent4: if the processing diplomacy does not occur then the undynamicness does not occur. sent5: the processing diplomacy occurs. sent6: the dissenting adornment does not occur if not the angiocarpicness but the undynamicness occurs. sent7: the undynamicness happens if the fact that the processing diplomacy but not the pleomorphicness occurs is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the processing diplomacy but not the pleomorphicness occurs is wrong.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the undynamicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undynamicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the processing diplomacy and the non-pleomorphicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the pleomorphicness does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the angiocarpicness does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the non-pleomorphicness and the non-angiocarpicness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the dissenting adornment does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the undynamicness happens triggers that both the non-pleomorphicness and the non-angiocarpicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-angiocarpicness and the phoneticsness occurs. sent2: that the undynamicness does not occur is correct if that the processing diplomacy but not the pleomorphicness happens is not correct. sent3: the phoneticsness occurs. sent4: if the processing diplomacy does not occur then the undynamicness does not occur. sent5: the processing diplomacy occurs. sent6: the dissenting adornment does not occur if not the angiocarpicness but the undynamicness occurs. sent7: the undynamicness happens if the fact that the processing diplomacy but not the pleomorphicness occurs is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the processing diplomacy but not the pleomorphicness occurs is wrong.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the undynamicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undynamicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the processing diplomacy and the non-pleomorphicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the pleomorphicness does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the angiocarpicness does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the non-pleomorphicness and the non-angiocarpicness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__