that the sedition does not occur but the impregnating happens is brought about by the diamagnetism.
sent1: the sedition does not occur but the impregnating occurs if the humanness does not occur. sent2: if that the monopolizing pansexual does not occur is not false the fact that both the sedition and the Olympian occurs is not right. sent3: the automation occurs. sent4: that the monopolizing pansexual happens and the reclassification does not occur is false if the spot-welding does not occur. sent5: that the outerness happens yields that not the mikvah but the inshoreness occurs. sent6: both the hypovolemicness and the humanness occurs if the impregnating does not occur. sent7: that the humanness happens is prevented by the non-hypovolemicness. sent8: that the hypovolemicness occurs is prevented by that the diamagnetism occurs and the automation happens. sent9: that the fact that the clamoring tauon does not occur and the spot-welding occurs is correct does not hold if the stakeout does not occur. sent10: if the hypovolemicness happens then the diamagnetism occurs and/or the automation does not occur. sent11: if the bibliophilicness happens then the outerness happens. sent12: if the fact that not the clamoring tauon but the spot-welding occurs is incorrect the spot-welding does not occur. sent13: both the bibliophilicness and the split happens if the bioluminescence does not occur. sent14: if that the monopolizing pansexual occurs and the reclassification does not occur is wrong the monopolizing pansexual does not occur. sent15: the stakeout does not occur if not the mikvah but the inshoreness occurs. sent16: the bioluminescence does not occur if the fact that the monopolizing sapote does not occur and the bioluminescence occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diamagnetism happens.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the diamagnetism occurs and the automation happens.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the hypovolemicness does not occur.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the humanness does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the sedition does not occur but the impregnating occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the astronauticness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the sedition does not occur but the impregnating happens is brought about by the diamagnetism. ; $context$ = sent1: the sedition does not occur but the impregnating occurs if the humanness does not occur. sent2: if that the monopolizing pansexual does not occur is not false the fact that both the sedition and the Olympian occurs is not right. sent3: the automation occurs. sent4: that the monopolizing pansexual happens and the reclassification does not occur is false if the spot-welding does not occur. sent5: that the outerness happens yields that not the mikvah but the inshoreness occurs. sent6: both the hypovolemicness and the humanness occurs if the impregnating does not occur. sent7: that the humanness happens is prevented by the non-hypovolemicness. sent8: that the hypovolemicness occurs is prevented by that the diamagnetism occurs and the automation happens. sent9: that the fact that the clamoring tauon does not occur and the spot-welding occurs is correct does not hold if the stakeout does not occur. sent10: if the hypovolemicness happens then the diamagnetism occurs and/or the automation does not occur. sent11: if the bibliophilicness happens then the outerness happens. sent12: if the fact that not the clamoring tauon but the spot-welding occurs is incorrect the spot-welding does not occur. sent13: both the bibliophilicness and the split happens if the bioluminescence does not occur. sent14: if that the monopolizing pansexual occurs and the reclassification does not occur is wrong the monopolizing pansexual does not occur. sent15: the stakeout does not occur if not the mikvah but the inshoreness occurs. sent16: the bioluminescence does not occur if the fact that the monopolizing sapote does not occur and the bioluminescence occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diamagnetism happens.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the diamagnetism occurs and the automation happens.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the hypovolemicness does not occur.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the humanness does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the sedition does not occur but the impregnating occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__