the fact that the windbreak is not a Mark and does not leach enactment is not true.
sent1: there is nothing such that it is not a Zulu and not subsonic. sent2: if the termer is not subsonic the cagoule is anguine and/or it is a Mauritanian. sent3: the cortex is a Mark if the housing is a compromise. sent4: either the cagoule is anguine or it is a Mauritanian or both. sent5: the fact that the fact that the windbreak is a Mark and does not leach enactment is correct is not true if that the cortex is a Mark is correct. sent6: if something is intestinal then it is not a kind of a Mark and it does not leach enactment. sent7: if the termer is not subsonic the cagoule is not anguine and/or it is a Mauritanian. sent8: the housing is Mauritanian. sent9: the housing is a Mark if the windbreak is not careful. sent10: that the windbreak is not a kind of a Mark but it leaches enactment is incorrect. sent11: if the cortex is a kind of a Mark the fact that the windbreak is not a Mark and it does not leach enactment is false. sent12: the termer does not leach driveller. sent13: if the fanny is a macrame then the housing is not non-careful. sent14: there exists something such that it is intestinal. sent15: there is something such that it does leach enactment. sent16: that the windbreak is not a Mark but it does leach enactment does not hold if the cortex is a Mark. sent17: the fact that the windbreak is a kind of a Mark that does not leach enactment is not correct. sent18: the Iowa compromises and/or it is a Zulu if the housing is not a macrame. sent19: if the housing is careful then it compromises. sent20: the fact that the termer is not subsonic hold if the Iowa does leach driveller. sent21: the Iowa leaches driveller and/or it is a Zulu if there is something such that it is intestinal. sent22: if the cagoule is not anguine the fanny is a macrame. sent23: the termer is not subsonic if the Iowa does leach driveller and/or is a Zulu. sent24: the cagoule is careful. sent25: the Iowa is not a Zulu and/or it is anguine if the cagoule does not leach enactment. sent26: if that something is not a Zulu and it is not subsonic is not correct it does not leach driveller. sent27: if the cagoule is not anguine or it is a Mauritanian or both the fact that the fanny is a macrame is right. sent28: the fact that the cagoule does not leach enactment and it is not a Mauritanian does not hold.
sent14 & sent21 -> int1: the Iowa leaches driveller or is a Zulu or both.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the termer is not subsonic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the cagoule is not anguine and/or is a Mauritanian.; int3 & sent27 -> int4: the fanny does macrame.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the housing is careful.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the housing compromises.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the cortex is a kind of a Mark.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the windbreak is not a Mark and does not leach enactment.
sent6 -> int8: the windbreak is not a Mark and does not leach enactment if it is intestinal.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the windbreak is not a Mark and does not leach enactment is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that it is not a Zulu and not subsonic. sent2: if the termer is not subsonic the cagoule is anguine and/or it is a Mauritanian. sent3: the cortex is a Mark if the housing is a compromise. sent4: either the cagoule is anguine or it is a Mauritanian or both. sent5: the fact that the fact that the windbreak is a Mark and does not leach enactment is correct is not true if that the cortex is a Mark is correct. sent6: if something is intestinal then it is not a kind of a Mark and it does not leach enactment. sent7: if the termer is not subsonic the cagoule is not anguine and/or it is a Mauritanian. sent8: the housing is Mauritanian. sent9: the housing is a Mark if the windbreak is not careful. sent10: that the windbreak is not a kind of a Mark but it leaches enactment is incorrect. sent11: if the cortex is a kind of a Mark the fact that the windbreak is not a Mark and it does not leach enactment is false. sent12: the termer does not leach driveller. sent13: if the fanny is a macrame then the housing is not non-careful. sent14: there exists something such that it is intestinal. sent15: there is something such that it does leach enactment. sent16: that the windbreak is not a Mark but it does leach enactment does not hold if the cortex is a Mark. sent17: the fact that the windbreak is a kind of a Mark that does not leach enactment is not correct. sent18: the Iowa compromises and/or it is a Zulu if the housing is not a macrame. sent19: if the housing is careful then it compromises. sent20: the fact that the termer is not subsonic hold if the Iowa does leach driveller. sent21: the Iowa leaches driveller and/or it is a Zulu if there is something such that it is intestinal. sent22: if the cagoule is not anguine the fanny is a macrame. sent23: the termer is not subsonic if the Iowa does leach driveller and/or is a Zulu. sent24: the cagoule is careful. sent25: the Iowa is not a Zulu and/or it is anguine if the cagoule does not leach enactment. sent26: if that something is not a Zulu and it is not subsonic is not correct it does not leach driveller. sent27: if the cagoule is not anguine or it is a Mauritanian or both the fact that the fanny is a macrame is right. sent28: the fact that the cagoule does not leach enactment and it is not a Mauritanian does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent21 -> int1: the Iowa leaches driveller or is a Zulu or both.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the termer is not subsonic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the cagoule is not anguine and/or is a Mauritanian.; int3 & sent27 -> int4: the fanny does macrame.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the housing is careful.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the housing compromises.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the cortex is a kind of a Mark.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__