the ischium is a kind of a health.
sent1: if the marquee is not structural or it does respect fruitlessness or both then the hone dives riposte. sent2: if the swamp does purple Fallopius the lapel purple Fallopius. sent3: the hone is not stomatous if the fact that it is not a smallholder and it is not a shuteye is not right. sent4: there is something such that it is not a smallholder. sent5: if something that is not stomatous does not purple Fallopius the lapel is not a fatherhood. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is stomatous and it does not purple Fallopius hold. sent7: if something dives riposte it does not purple Fallopius. sent8: everything is not structural and/or it does respect fruitlessness. sent9: the fact that the hone is not a smallholder and not a shuteye does not hold. sent10: something is not seismological if the fact that it is a research and it is seismological is false. sent11: there are non-nonrepresentational things. sent12: if the roller-skater is not a shuteye then the teller expostulates and is a smallholder. sent13: if the fact that the lapel is not a kind of a fatherhood is right then that the ischium does expostulate and is not a fatherhood is false. sent14: if the hone does not dive riposte then the marquee is not a shuteye and/or it is a Issus. sent15: something is not a kind of a health if the fact that it expostulates and is not a kind of a fatherhood is not correct. sent16: the roller-skater is not a kind of a shuteye and is a Canaanite if there are non-seismological things. sent17: that the swamp purples Fallopius and/or it is stomatous hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a fatherhood. sent18: if the lapel does purple Fallopius then the hone does not dive riposte but it is a health. sent19: if the hone does not dive riposte but it is a health then the ischium is a kind of a health. sent20: the fact that the harbor is a research and seismological is false.
sent8 -> int1: the marquee is not structural and/or it respects fruitlessness.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the hone does dive riposte.; sent7 -> int3: the hone does not purple Fallopius if it dives riposte.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hone does not purple Fallopius is true.; sent3 & sent9 -> int5: the hone is not stomatous.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the hone is not stomatous and it does not purple Fallopius.; int6 -> int7: something is non-stomatous thing that does not purple Fallopius.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the lapel is not a fatherhood.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: that the ischium does expostulate and is not a kind of a fatherhood is not true.; sent15 -> int10: the ischium is not a health if that it does expostulate and is not a kind of a fatherhood is incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the ischium is a kind of a health.
sent10 -> int11: the harbor is not seismological if that it researches and it is seismological is false.; int11 & sent20 -> int12: the harbor is not seismological.; int12 -> int13: there are non-seismological things.; int13 & sent16 -> int14: the roller-skater is not a kind of a shuteye but it is a Canaanite.; int14 -> int15: the roller-skater is not a kind of a shuteye.; sent12 & int15 -> int16: the teller expostulates and it is a kind of a smallholder.; int16 -> int17: the teller expostulates.;
$hypothesis$ = the ischium is a kind of a health. ; $context$ = sent1: if the marquee is not structural or it does respect fruitlessness or both then the hone dives riposte. sent2: if the swamp does purple Fallopius the lapel purple Fallopius. sent3: the hone is not stomatous if the fact that it is not a smallholder and it is not a shuteye is not right. sent4: there is something such that it is not a smallholder. sent5: if something that is not stomatous does not purple Fallopius the lapel is not a fatherhood. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is stomatous and it does not purple Fallopius hold. sent7: if something dives riposte it does not purple Fallopius. sent8: everything is not structural and/or it does respect fruitlessness. sent9: the fact that the hone is not a smallholder and not a shuteye does not hold. sent10: something is not seismological if the fact that it is a research and it is seismological is false. sent11: there are non-nonrepresentational things. sent12: if the roller-skater is not a shuteye then the teller expostulates and is a smallholder. sent13: if the fact that the lapel is not a kind of a fatherhood is right then that the ischium does expostulate and is not a fatherhood is false. sent14: if the hone does not dive riposte then the marquee is not a shuteye and/or it is a Issus. sent15: something is not a kind of a health if the fact that it expostulates and is not a kind of a fatherhood is not correct. sent16: the roller-skater is not a kind of a shuteye and is a Canaanite if there are non-seismological things. sent17: that the swamp purples Fallopius and/or it is stomatous hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a fatherhood. sent18: if the lapel does purple Fallopius then the hone does not dive riposte but it is a health. sent19: if the hone does not dive riposte but it is a health then the ischium is a kind of a health. sent20: the fact that the harbor is a research and seismological is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the marquee is not structural and/or it respects fruitlessness.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the hone does dive riposte.; sent7 -> int3: the hone does not purple Fallopius if it dives riposte.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hone does not purple Fallopius is true.; sent3 & sent9 -> int5: the hone is not stomatous.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the hone is not stomatous and it does not purple Fallopius.; int6 -> int7: something is non-stomatous thing that does not purple Fallopius.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the lapel is not a fatherhood.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: that the ischium does expostulate and is not a kind of a fatherhood is not true.; sent15 -> int10: the ischium is not a health if that it does expostulate and is not a kind of a fatherhood is incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__