the tidbit does ridge.
sent1: if the tidbit is a fjord and a nonprofit then that it does not ridge is right. sent2: The canto does border firebrick. sent3: the firebrick does not border canto if it is a kind of a fjord and it is a nonprofit. sent4: the chalet is Pauline. sent5: the firebrick does border canto. sent6: if the chalet is not aecial but it is a compressibility the mezereon does not forage swathing. sent7: the chalet does forage mezereon. sent8: if the firebrick is a kind of a ridge then the tidbit is a kind of a ridge. sent9: if something that does forage mezereon is Pauline the fact that it is sterile does not hold. sent10: if the firebrick is a kind of a ridge that is a fjord it does not border canto. sent11: the tidbit is a fjord if the firebrick borders canto. sent12: the firebrick ridges and/or it does not border canto if something is not a kind of a fjord. sent13: the tidbit forages overpopulation. sent14: a non-sterile thing is a kind of non-aecial thing that is a kind of a compressibility. sent15: the tidbit is a nonprofit. sent16: the fact that something is both not a miro and a nonprofit is not true if it does not forage swathing.
sent11 & sent5 -> int1: the tidbit is a kind of a fjord.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the tidbit is a fjord and it is a nonprofit.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tidbit ridges is not wrong.
sent16 -> int3: if the mezereon does not forage swathing the fact that it is not a miro and it is a nonprofit is not correct.; sent14 -> int4: the chalet is not aecial and is a compressibility if it is not sterile.; sent9 -> int5: the chalet is not sterile if it forages mezereon and is Pauline.; sent7 & sent4 -> int6: the chalet forages mezereon and is Pauline.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the chalet is not sterile.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the chalet is not aecial and is a compressibility.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the mezereon does not forage swathing.; int3 & int9 -> int10: that the mezereon is not a miro and is a nonprofit is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the tidbit does ridge. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tidbit is a fjord and a nonprofit then that it does not ridge is right. sent2: The canto does border firebrick. sent3: the firebrick does not border canto if it is a kind of a fjord and it is a nonprofit. sent4: the chalet is Pauline. sent5: the firebrick does border canto. sent6: if the chalet is not aecial but it is a compressibility the mezereon does not forage swathing. sent7: the chalet does forage mezereon. sent8: if the firebrick is a kind of a ridge then the tidbit is a kind of a ridge. sent9: if something that does forage mezereon is Pauline the fact that it is sterile does not hold. sent10: if the firebrick is a kind of a ridge that is a fjord it does not border canto. sent11: the tidbit is a fjord if the firebrick borders canto. sent12: the firebrick ridges and/or it does not border canto if something is not a kind of a fjord. sent13: the tidbit forages overpopulation. sent14: a non-sterile thing is a kind of non-aecial thing that is a kind of a compressibility. sent15: the tidbit is a nonprofit. sent16: the fact that something is both not a miro and a nonprofit is not true if it does not forage swathing. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent5 -> int1: the tidbit is a kind of a fjord.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the tidbit is a fjord and it is a nonprofit.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__