the sweetmeat glamorizes Tungusic.
sent1: if something is hydroelectric and it hates derivation it does not glamorize Tungusic. sent2: if the sweetmeat is not maladaptive and copies tarsus the fact that it is hydroelectric is correct. sent3: the derivation is not maladaptive. sent4: the sweetmeat is probabilistic and it does hate derivation. sent5: the sweetmeat does not glamorize Cotonou and is probabilistic. sent6: the sweetmeat is not maladaptive but it copies tarsus. sent7: the cardholder is not hydroelectric. sent8: the sweetmeat does glamorize porbeagle. sent9: the fly hates derivation.
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the sweetmeat is hydroelectric hold.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the sweetmeat does hate derivation hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sweetmeat is hydroelectric and it does hate derivation.; sent1 -> int4: the sweetmeat does not glamorize Tungusic if it is hydroelectric and it hates derivation.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sweetmeat glamorizes Tungusic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is hydroelectric and it hates derivation it does not glamorize Tungusic. sent2: if the sweetmeat is not maladaptive and copies tarsus the fact that it is hydroelectric is correct. sent3: the derivation is not maladaptive. sent4: the sweetmeat is probabilistic and it does hate derivation. sent5: the sweetmeat does not glamorize Cotonou and is probabilistic. sent6: the sweetmeat is not maladaptive but it copies tarsus. sent7: the cardholder is not hydroelectric. sent8: the sweetmeat does glamorize porbeagle. sent9: the fly hates derivation. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the sweetmeat is hydroelectric hold.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the sweetmeat does hate derivation hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sweetmeat is hydroelectric and it does hate derivation.; sent1 -> int4: the sweetmeat does not glamorize Tungusic if it is hydroelectric and it hates derivation.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__