the understudy is a cryptogram.
sent1: the fact that the damselfish does not sight rhapsody but it shivers does not hold. sent2: the fact that the damselfish does not sight rhapsody but it shivers is not true if the fact that the bilges is not hypotensive is false. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does shiver and is a kind of an aspen is false then the bilges does not fight nosepiece. sent4: something shivers if it is an osmund. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not groove flaunt then that the kangaroo is a kind of residuary thing that does not groove blaring is not true. sent6: if that the understudy is not a focus but a kettle is not correct it is not a scald. sent7: the damselfish does not shiver. sent8: the torte does not curvet side if there is something such that the fact that it is not non-residuary and does not groove blaring is not right. sent9: if the latrine is not an aspen then the damselfish does not sight rhapsody and does not shiver. sent10: the understudy is not a cryptogram and is not hypotensive if it sights rhapsody. sent11: the latrine does sight rhapsody if that the kingpin does sight rhapsody is not false. sent12: that the fact that the bilges is not a scald and is not a kettle is correct is wrong. sent13: the latrine is an osmund. sent14: that the damselfish does not sight rhapsody and it does not shiver is not correct if the bilges is a hypotensive. sent15: the bilges is not a scald. sent16: the latrine is not a kind of an aspen. sent17: if that the understudy does not scald hold the bilges is not a kind of a scald. sent18: if the understudy is not a kettle it is not a scald. sent19: if the latrine does shiver and sights rhapsody the damselfish does not sights rhapsody. sent20: if the understudy is not a cryptogram then that it is not a focus but a kettle is incorrect. sent21: there exists something such that the fact that it shivers and is a kind of an aspen is not right. sent22: if the damselfish does not sight rhapsody then that the bilges is a scald and not a hypotensive is not correct. sent23: the vermouth does not groove flaunt. sent24: if that the latrine is not a kind of an aspen is right then the damselfish does not shiver.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the understudy is not a cryptogram.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the understudy is not a focus and is a kind of a kettle is not correct.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the understudy does not scald.; sent9 & sent16 -> int3: the damselfish does not sight rhapsody and it does not shiver.;
the understudy is not a cryptogram.
sent4 -> int4: the latrine does shiver if it is an osmund.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the latrine does shiver.; sent23 -> int6: something does not groove flaunt.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the fact that the kangaroo is residuary but it does not groove blaring is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it is residuary and does not groove blaring is not correct.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the torte does not curvet side.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it does not curvet side.;
$hypothesis$ = the understudy is a cryptogram. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the damselfish does not sight rhapsody but it shivers does not hold. sent2: the fact that the damselfish does not sight rhapsody but it shivers is not true if the fact that the bilges is not hypotensive is false. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does shiver and is a kind of an aspen is false then the bilges does not fight nosepiece. sent4: something shivers if it is an osmund. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not groove flaunt then that the kangaroo is a kind of residuary thing that does not groove blaring is not true. sent6: if that the understudy is not a focus but a kettle is not correct it is not a scald. sent7: the damselfish does not shiver. sent8: the torte does not curvet side if there is something such that the fact that it is not non-residuary and does not groove blaring is not right. sent9: if the latrine is not an aspen then the damselfish does not sight rhapsody and does not shiver. sent10: the understudy is not a cryptogram and is not hypotensive if it sights rhapsody. sent11: the latrine does sight rhapsody if that the kingpin does sight rhapsody is not false. sent12: that the fact that the bilges is not a scald and is not a kettle is correct is wrong. sent13: the latrine is an osmund. sent14: that the damselfish does not sight rhapsody and it does not shiver is not correct if the bilges is a hypotensive. sent15: the bilges is not a scald. sent16: the latrine is not a kind of an aspen. sent17: if that the understudy does not scald hold the bilges is not a kind of a scald. sent18: if the understudy is not a kettle it is not a scald. sent19: if the latrine does shiver and sights rhapsody the damselfish does not sights rhapsody. sent20: if the understudy is not a cryptogram then that it is not a focus but a kettle is incorrect. sent21: there exists something such that the fact that it shivers and is a kind of an aspen is not right. sent22: if the damselfish does not sight rhapsody then that the bilges is a scald and not a hypotensive is not correct. sent23: the vermouth does not groove flaunt. sent24: if that the latrine is not a kind of an aspen is right then the damselfish does not shiver. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the understudy is not a cryptogram.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the understudy is not a focus and is a kind of a kettle is not correct.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the understudy does not scald.; sent9 & sent16 -> int3: the damselfish does not sight rhapsody and it does not shiver.; __UNKNOWN__