the birdbath is not a Leptoglossus.
sent1: something that is not a term and is a persecution is not a liberalization. sent2: the Jihadist is both a cabbage and hairless. sent3: the father-in-law is a cabbage that is not hairless if that it does repress monolatry hold. sent4: the father-in-law is a liberalization. sent5: the birdbath represses monolatry if something that is a cabbage is hairless. sent6: the father-in-law is a persecution. sent7: the Jihadist is hairless.
sent2 -> int1: something is a cabbage and it is hairless.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the birdbath represses monolatry.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the birdbath is a Leptoglossus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the birdbath does repress monolatry and it is a Leptoglossus.; int3 -> int4: something does repress monolatry and it is a Leptoglossus.; sent1 -> int5: if the father-in-law is not a term and is a kind of a persecution it is not a kind of a liberalization.;
the birdbath is a Leptoglossus.
$hypothesis$ = the birdbath is not a Leptoglossus. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a term and is a persecution is not a liberalization. sent2: the Jihadist is both a cabbage and hairless. sent3: the father-in-law is a cabbage that is not hairless if that it does repress monolatry hold. sent4: the father-in-law is a liberalization. sent5: the birdbath represses monolatry if something that is a cabbage is hairless. sent6: the father-in-law is a persecution. sent7: the Jihadist is hairless. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: something is a cabbage and it is hairless.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the birdbath represses monolatry.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the birdbath is a Leptoglossus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the birdbath does repress monolatry and it is a Leptoglossus.; int3 -> int4: something does repress monolatry and it is a Leptoglossus.; sent1 -> int5: if the father-in-law is not a term and is a kind of a persecution it is not a kind of a liberalization.; __UNKNOWN__