the fact that the moorcock is nonspherical and is not immunological is incorrect.
sent1: the rhodolite is semiautobiographical. sent2: the roofer is semiautobiographical. sent3: the rhodolite is immunological if the agriculturist spoofs gazania. sent4: the fact that the agriculturist spoofs gazania but it is not a sixties is wrong. sent5: if that the moorcock spoofs gazania is not incorrect then the rhodolite is immunological. sent6: the fact that the rhodolite is germfree but it is not immunological is incorrect if that the agriculturist spoofs gazania is not incorrect. sent7: if the agriculturist is germfree then the fact that the moorcock is nonspherical thing that is immunological does not hold. sent8: the fact that the moorcock is nonspherical but it is not immunological is false if the agriculturist is germfree. sent9: the rhodolite is germfree. sent10: the moorcock is semiautobiographical. sent11: if the rhodolite does spoof gazania the fact that the moorcock is germfree thing that is not nonspherical is not right. sent12: the agriculturist is germfree if the rhodolite spoofs gazania. sent13: that something is semiautobiographical hold if the fact that it is non-germfree thing that spoofs gazania is not correct. sent14: the fact that the roofer is germfree but it is not semiautobiographical does not hold. sent15: that the agriculturist is germfree and is not nonspherical is not right. sent16: if the agriculturist is germfree that the fact that the roofer is both semiautobiographical and not nonspherical is false hold. sent17: if the rhodolite is semiautobiographical the fact that the roofer spoofs gazania and is not immunological is incorrect. sent18: the agriculturist is nonspherical. sent19: the fact that the moorcock is nonspherical and immunological does not hold. sent20: the moorcock does spoof gazania. sent21: if the moorcock is germfree the agriculturist is nonspherical.
the moorcock is nonspherical and non-immunological.
sent13 -> int1: the fact that the moorcock is semiautobiographical is right if the fact that it is not germfree and spoofs gazania is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the moorcock is nonspherical and is not immunological is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the rhodolite is semiautobiographical. sent2: the roofer is semiautobiographical. sent3: the rhodolite is immunological if the agriculturist spoofs gazania. sent4: the fact that the agriculturist spoofs gazania but it is not a sixties is wrong. sent5: if that the moorcock spoofs gazania is not incorrect then the rhodolite is immunological. sent6: the fact that the rhodolite is germfree but it is not immunological is incorrect if that the agriculturist spoofs gazania is not incorrect. sent7: if the agriculturist is germfree then the fact that the moorcock is nonspherical thing that is immunological does not hold. sent8: the fact that the moorcock is nonspherical but it is not immunological is false if the agriculturist is germfree. sent9: the rhodolite is germfree. sent10: the moorcock is semiautobiographical. sent11: if the rhodolite does spoof gazania the fact that the moorcock is germfree thing that is not nonspherical is not right. sent12: the agriculturist is germfree if the rhodolite spoofs gazania. sent13: that something is semiautobiographical hold if the fact that it is non-germfree thing that spoofs gazania is not correct. sent14: the fact that the roofer is germfree but it is not semiautobiographical does not hold. sent15: that the agriculturist is germfree and is not nonspherical is not right. sent16: if the agriculturist is germfree that the fact that the roofer is both semiautobiographical and not nonspherical is false hold. sent17: if the rhodolite is semiautobiographical the fact that the roofer spoofs gazania and is not immunological is incorrect. sent18: the agriculturist is nonspherical. sent19: the fact that the moorcock is nonspherical and immunological does not hold. sent20: the moorcock does spoof gazania. sent21: if the moorcock is germfree the agriculturist is nonspherical. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__