the wallflower is a kind of bignoniaceous thing that does not bankrupt Solenidae.
sent1: there exists something such that it is orchestral. sent2: the wallflower is bignoniaceous if the hairnet does not bankrupt Solenidae. sent3: if something that is orchestral is a kind of a pitcher the hairnet does not bankrupt Solenidae. sent4: if the rensselaerite does not unseal Preakness then the fact that the taps is not a pleat and it does not bankrupt Parulidae is wrong. sent5: if something bankrupts subconsciousness then the fact that it does not bankrupt Solenidae and is not a pitcher is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that it does not stunt half-truth. sent7: if the hairnet does not bankrupt Solenidae then the wallflower is bignoniaceous but it does not bankrupt Solenidae. sent8: the rensselaerite is a kind of a pitcher if there exists something such that it does not bankrupt subconsciousness. sent9: something bankrupts subconsciousness if it is bignoniaceous. sent10: if something does not stunt half-truth and does not tincture the rensselaerite is orchestral. sent11: the fact that the rensselaerite does not unseal Preakness hold. sent12: the taps is cardiographic and it is bignoniaceous. sent13: the wallflower is bignoniaceous. sent14: if the fact that something does not pleat and it does not bankrupt Parulidae does not hold then it bankrupt Parulidae. sent15: there is something such that it does not bankrupt subconsciousness.
sent15 & sent8 -> int1: the rensselaerite is a pitcher.;
the taps is orchestral and bankrupts Parulidae.
sent5 -> int2: if the taps does bankrupt subconsciousness then that it does not bankrupt Solenidae and it is not a pitcher is not right.; sent9 -> int3: if the taps is bignoniaceous the fact that it bankrupts subconsciousness is not wrong.; sent12 -> int4: the taps is bignoniaceous.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the taps does bankrupt subconsciousness.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the taps does not bankrupt Solenidae and is not a pitcher is incorrect.; sent14 -> int7: the taps bankrupts Parulidae if the fact that it is not a pleat and it does not bankrupts Parulidae is false.; sent4 & sent11 -> int8: that the taps is not a pleat and does not bankrupt Parulidae is false.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the taps bankrupts Parulidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the wallflower is a kind of bignoniaceous thing that does not bankrupt Solenidae. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is orchestral. sent2: the wallflower is bignoniaceous if the hairnet does not bankrupt Solenidae. sent3: if something that is orchestral is a kind of a pitcher the hairnet does not bankrupt Solenidae. sent4: if the rensselaerite does not unseal Preakness then the fact that the taps is not a pleat and it does not bankrupt Parulidae is wrong. sent5: if something bankrupts subconsciousness then the fact that it does not bankrupt Solenidae and is not a pitcher is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that it does not stunt half-truth. sent7: if the hairnet does not bankrupt Solenidae then the wallflower is bignoniaceous but it does not bankrupt Solenidae. sent8: the rensselaerite is a kind of a pitcher if there exists something such that it does not bankrupt subconsciousness. sent9: something bankrupts subconsciousness if it is bignoniaceous. sent10: if something does not stunt half-truth and does not tincture the rensselaerite is orchestral. sent11: the fact that the rensselaerite does not unseal Preakness hold. sent12: the taps is cardiographic and it is bignoniaceous. sent13: the wallflower is bignoniaceous. sent14: if the fact that something does not pleat and it does not bankrupt Parulidae does not hold then it bankrupt Parulidae. sent15: there is something such that it does not bankrupt subconsciousness. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent8 -> int1: the rensselaerite is a pitcher.; __UNKNOWN__