the fact that there is something such that if it unseals then it is messianic is not correct.
sent1: if the spritsail does unseal then it is messianic. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a methapyrilene is correct then it hitches example. sent3: if the Cornus is a malfunction it does unseal. sent4: there is something such that if that it climbs is true then it is indigestible. sent5: if something is a polemicist it is technophobic. sent6: the spritsail does remount if it trebles reentry. sent7: the muton is messianic if the fact that it is not non-anabiotic is not wrong. sent8: if the spritsail is alar then it is messianic.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a polemicist it is technophobic.
sent5 -> int1: if the Mohammedan is a polemicist it is technophobic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it unseals then it is messianic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spritsail does unseal then it is messianic. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a methapyrilene is correct then it hitches example. sent3: if the Cornus is a malfunction it does unseal. sent4: there is something such that if that it climbs is true then it is indigestible. sent5: if something is a polemicist it is technophobic. sent6: the spritsail does remount if it trebles reentry. sent7: the muton is messianic if the fact that it is not non-anabiotic is not wrong. sent8: if the spritsail is alar then it is messianic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__