the fluorite is not a kind of a cabin.
sent1: if the schnitzel is not lipped then it is least. sent2: the fluorite does catapult muntjac if it is a pyrope. sent3: the fluorite does pant-hoot. sent4: the fluorite does belabor lambdacism and it is a catty. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is radiographic and/or not a Tara does not hold. sent6: that the fluorite does philander ply hold if it is a decidua. sent7: if the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a dispersion and/or belabors acronym is not false is false that it is not a cabin is true. sent8: something is not a cabin if it is not a dispersion and does not belabor acronym. sent9: if the fact that the acridid is both not a panhandler and a dispersion does not hold the ply is a kind of a dispersion. sent10: something is a cabin if it does belabor acronym. sent11: something is a dispersion if it belabors acronym. sent12: the fluorite is a dispersion and it catapults cicada. sent13: the mesquite is a dispersion if it is a kind of a contentedness. sent14: something is a screener if it is hydropathic. sent15: the fluorite is a dispersion. sent16: that the turnout is a cabin and it is bladdery is correct. sent17: the ply does belabor acronym if there is something such that that either it is radiographic or it is not a kind of a Tara or both is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the trypsin belabors acronym is correct. sent19: the fluorite is a kind of a dispersion that does belabor acronym.
sent19 -> int1: the fluorite belabors acronym.; sent10 -> int2: if the fluorite does belabor acronym it is a kind of a cabin.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fluorite is not a cabin.
sent7 -> int3: the fluorite does not cabin if that it is not a kind of a dispersion and/or it does belabor acronym is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fluorite is not a kind of a cabin. ; $context$ = sent1: if the schnitzel is not lipped then it is least. sent2: the fluorite does catapult muntjac if it is a pyrope. sent3: the fluorite does pant-hoot. sent4: the fluorite does belabor lambdacism and it is a catty. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is radiographic and/or not a Tara does not hold. sent6: that the fluorite does philander ply hold if it is a decidua. sent7: if the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a dispersion and/or belabors acronym is not false is false that it is not a cabin is true. sent8: something is not a cabin if it is not a dispersion and does not belabor acronym. sent9: if the fact that the acridid is both not a panhandler and a dispersion does not hold the ply is a kind of a dispersion. sent10: something is a cabin if it does belabor acronym. sent11: something is a dispersion if it belabors acronym. sent12: the fluorite is a dispersion and it catapults cicada. sent13: the mesquite is a dispersion if it is a kind of a contentedness. sent14: something is a screener if it is hydropathic. sent15: the fluorite is a dispersion. sent16: that the turnout is a cabin and it is bladdery is correct. sent17: the ply does belabor acronym if there is something such that that either it is radiographic or it is not a kind of a Tara or both is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the trypsin belabors acronym is correct. sent19: the fluorite is a kind of a dispersion that does belabor acronym. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the fluorite belabors acronym.; sent10 -> int2: if the fluorite does belabor acronym it is a kind of a cabin.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__