the fact that there is something such that that it does not debouch and is not allantoic is false is not correct.
sent1: something does not colonize and does not cloud pin-up. sent2: there exists something such that that it debouches and it is not allantoic is incorrect. sent3: the ACTH is a Milanese. sent4: if the pin-up does not debouch and is not allantoic then that the ACTH is eugenic hold. sent5: there is something such that it does not colonize. sent6: that the pin-up does not debouch and is allantoic is not right. sent7: if something does not colonize and does not cloud pin-up then the ACTH is not eugenic. sent8: the pin-up is not a teaberry if that the ACTH is not a kind of a delicatessen but it clouds pin-up is not wrong. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not debouch and it is allantoic does not hold. sent10: there is something such that it does not cloud pin-up. sent11: the pin-up is not allantoic. sent12: there are non-allantoic and non-eugenic things. sent13: the pin-up is allantoic if the ACTH debouches and is not eugenic. sent14: something is not a bubble. sent15: there exists something such that that it is non-eugenic thing that does not debouch is false. sent16: something colonizes and does not cloud pin-up. sent17: the ACTH is not non-eugenic if the pin-up does not debouch but it is allantoic. sent18: there exists something such that it does not debouch and is not allantoic. sent19: the pin-up is not eugenic and it is not allantoic. sent20: there is something such that it does not colonize and it clouds pin-up.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pin-up does not debouch and is not allantoic.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the ACTH is eugenic.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: the ACTH is not eugenic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the pin-up does not debouch and it is not allantoic does not hold.; int4 -> hypothesis;
something is both not a teaberry and not a sweatshop.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that that it does not debouch and is not allantoic is false is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not colonize and does not cloud pin-up. sent2: there exists something such that that it debouches and it is not allantoic is incorrect. sent3: the ACTH is a Milanese. sent4: if the pin-up does not debouch and is not allantoic then that the ACTH is eugenic hold. sent5: there is something such that it does not colonize. sent6: that the pin-up does not debouch and is allantoic is not right. sent7: if something does not colonize and does not cloud pin-up then the ACTH is not eugenic. sent8: the pin-up is not a teaberry if that the ACTH is not a kind of a delicatessen but it clouds pin-up is not wrong. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not debouch and it is allantoic does not hold. sent10: there is something such that it does not cloud pin-up. sent11: the pin-up is not allantoic. sent12: there are non-allantoic and non-eugenic things. sent13: the pin-up is allantoic if the ACTH debouches and is not eugenic. sent14: something is not a bubble. sent15: there exists something such that that it is non-eugenic thing that does not debouch is false. sent16: something colonizes and does not cloud pin-up. sent17: the ACTH is not non-eugenic if the pin-up does not debouch but it is allantoic. sent18: there exists something such that it does not debouch and is not allantoic. sent19: the pin-up is not eugenic and it is not allantoic. sent20: there is something such that it does not colonize and it clouds pin-up. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pin-up does not debouch and is not allantoic.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the ACTH is eugenic.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: the ACTH is not eugenic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the pin-up does not debouch and it is not allantoic does not hold.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__