the schoolyard is a airiness and/or it is not a shit.
sent1: the crystal does not bar luger. sent2: if the vesicle is not Thoreauvian that either the Sazerac bars luger or it is an interviewer or both is not correct. sent3: something that is not universalistic is not non-Thoreauvian but a metamorphism. sent4: the cheesecloth is a Sabaoth. sent5: if a non-thermionics thing bars conductress then it is not universalistic. sent6: if the fact that something bars luger and/or is a kind of an interviewer does not hold then it is not vibrational. sent7: the background is not vibrational but it bars luger. sent8: the aberration is not thermionics but it bars conductress. sent9: either something is a airiness or it is not a shit or both if it does not bar luger. sent10: the fact that the cheesecloth is not chaetognathan is wrong if it does transform. sent11: the cheesecloth does transform. sent12: the aberration is non-colonic if something that is a kind of a Sabaoth is chaetognathan. sent13: that the luger is not a shit but vibrational is incorrect if something is not vibrational. sent14: the background is not a shit if that the luger is both not a shit and vibrational is not right. sent15: if the aberration is not a colonic but it is Thoreauvian then the vesicle is not Thoreauvian. sent16: the schoolyard does not bar luger if the background is not vibrational but it bar luger.
sent9 -> int1: if the schoolyard does not bar luger it is a kind of a airiness and/or it is not a kind of a shit.; sent16 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the schoolyard does not bar luger is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the background is not a kind of a shit.
sent6 -> int3: the fact that the Sazerac is not vibrational is true if the fact that it either does bar luger or does interview or both does not hold.; sent10 & sent11 -> int4: that the cheesecloth is chaetognathan is not incorrect.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the cheesecloth is a kind of a Sabaoth that is not non-chaetognathan.; int5 -> int6: something is a kind of a Sabaoth and is chaetognathan.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the aberration is not a kind of a colonic.; sent3 -> int8: the aberration is Thoreauvian and it is a metamorphism if it is not universalistic.; sent5 -> int9: if the aberration is not thermionics and bars conductress then it is not universalistic.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the aberration is not universalistic.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the aberration is Thoreauvian and it is a kind of a metamorphism.; int11 -> int12: the aberration is Thoreauvian.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the aberration is a kind of non-colonic thing that is Thoreauvian.; sent15 & int13 -> int14: the vesicle is not Thoreauvian.; sent2 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the Sazerac bars luger and/or interviews is incorrect.; int3 & int15 -> int16: the Sazerac is not vibrational.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is not vibrational.; int17 & sent13 -> int18: that the luger is not a shit but vibrational is false.; sent14 & int18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the schoolyard is a airiness and/or it is not a shit. ; $context$ = sent1: the crystal does not bar luger. sent2: if the vesicle is not Thoreauvian that either the Sazerac bars luger or it is an interviewer or both is not correct. sent3: something that is not universalistic is not non-Thoreauvian but a metamorphism. sent4: the cheesecloth is a Sabaoth. sent5: if a non-thermionics thing bars conductress then it is not universalistic. sent6: if the fact that something bars luger and/or is a kind of an interviewer does not hold then it is not vibrational. sent7: the background is not vibrational but it bars luger. sent8: the aberration is not thermionics but it bars conductress. sent9: either something is a airiness or it is not a shit or both if it does not bar luger. sent10: the fact that the cheesecloth is not chaetognathan is wrong if it does transform. sent11: the cheesecloth does transform. sent12: the aberration is non-colonic if something that is a kind of a Sabaoth is chaetognathan. sent13: that the luger is not a shit but vibrational is incorrect if something is not vibrational. sent14: the background is not a shit if that the luger is both not a shit and vibrational is not right. sent15: if the aberration is not a colonic but it is Thoreauvian then the vesicle is not Thoreauvian. sent16: the schoolyard does not bar luger if the background is not vibrational but it bar luger. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the schoolyard does not bar luger it is a kind of a airiness and/or it is not a kind of a shit.; sent16 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the schoolyard does not bar luger is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__