the ventralness occurs.
sent1: that not the bicycle but the spooning gasfield happens is correct. sent2: the bitch and the non-sciaticness occurs. sent3: the fact that the enslaving Bhutanese does not occur hold if the bitch but not the sciaticness happens. sent4: the fact that the transmigration happens is not incorrect if the familialness occurs. sent5: the ventralness occurs if the familialness does not occur. sent6: that both the bitch and the sciaticness occurs results in that the enslaving Bhutanese does not occur. sent7: that the bitch does not occur yields that the beading parasailing occurs and the enslaving Bhutanese happens. sent8: that both the transmigration and the spooning gasfield occurs prevents that the protestantness happens. sent9: the blister and the beading pity happens. sent10: the protestantness and the beading parasailing occurs if the enslaving Bhutanese does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the familialness happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the transmigration occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the spooning gasfield happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the transmigration and the spooning gasfield occurs.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the protestantness does not occur.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the enslaving Bhutanese does not occur.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the protestantness and the beading parasailing happens.; int6 -> int7: the protestantness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the familialness does not occur.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the ventralness does not occur is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the ventralness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the bicycle but the spooning gasfield happens is correct. sent2: the bitch and the non-sciaticness occurs. sent3: the fact that the enslaving Bhutanese does not occur hold if the bitch but not the sciaticness happens. sent4: the fact that the transmigration happens is not incorrect if the familialness occurs. sent5: the ventralness occurs if the familialness does not occur. sent6: that both the bitch and the sciaticness occurs results in that the enslaving Bhutanese does not occur. sent7: that the bitch does not occur yields that the beading parasailing occurs and the enslaving Bhutanese happens. sent8: that both the transmigration and the spooning gasfield occurs prevents that the protestantness happens. sent9: the blister and the beading pity happens. sent10: the protestantness and the beading parasailing occurs if the enslaving Bhutanese does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the familialness happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the transmigration occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the spooning gasfield happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the transmigration and the spooning gasfield occurs.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the protestantness does not occur.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the enslaving Bhutanese does not occur.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the protestantness and the beading parasailing happens.; int6 -> int7: the protestantness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the familialness does not occur.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__