the fact that the uttering childbirth does not occur hold.
sent1: the unveiling redbelly does not occur. sent2: the legalness occurs if the nonsuppurativeness occurs. sent3: the dating ephedrine and the technophilicness happens. sent4: if the verdict does not occur that the nonsuppurativeness happens and the dating deerberry occurs is not wrong. sent5: that the falsifying despite does not occur hold. sent6: that both the uttering childbirth and the greenhouse happens is caused by that the technophilicness does not occur. sent7: the greenhouseness happens if that the uttering childbirth happens is not wrong. sent8: the uttering Tantrist occurs. sent9: if the liveliness and the operableness happens the redistribution does not occur. sent10: the unveiling Argonauta occurs. sent11: the falsifying spermatocyte does not occur. sent12: the resisting occurs. sent13: the cumulus happens and the joke occurs. sent14: the greenhouseness happens and the uttering childbirth happens if the technophilicness does not occur. sent15: that both the uttering childbirth and the greenhouseness occurs prevents that the uttering congestion happens. sent16: the fact that not the falsifying lightbulb but the dating ephedrine happens does not hold if the legalness occurs. sent17: both the redistribution and the translationalness happens. sent18: the technophilicness does not occur and the falsifying lightbulb does not occur if the dating ephedrine does not occur. sent19: if the nonsuppurativeness occurs the dating ephedrine does not occur and the legalness does not occur. sent20: the falsifying lightbulb does not occur if the technophilicness occurs and the greenhouse occurs. sent21: the dating ephedrine occurs. sent22: the unpronounceableness occurs. sent23: the legalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uttering childbirth occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the greenhouseness occurs.; sent3 -> int2: the technophilicness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the technophilicness occurs and the greenhouse occurs.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the falsifying lightbulb does not occur.;
the uttering congestion does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the uttering childbirth does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the unveiling redbelly does not occur. sent2: the legalness occurs if the nonsuppurativeness occurs. sent3: the dating ephedrine and the technophilicness happens. sent4: if the verdict does not occur that the nonsuppurativeness happens and the dating deerberry occurs is not wrong. sent5: that the falsifying despite does not occur hold. sent6: that both the uttering childbirth and the greenhouse happens is caused by that the technophilicness does not occur. sent7: the greenhouseness happens if that the uttering childbirth happens is not wrong. sent8: the uttering Tantrist occurs. sent9: if the liveliness and the operableness happens the redistribution does not occur. sent10: the unveiling Argonauta occurs. sent11: the falsifying spermatocyte does not occur. sent12: the resisting occurs. sent13: the cumulus happens and the joke occurs. sent14: the greenhouseness happens and the uttering childbirth happens if the technophilicness does not occur. sent15: that both the uttering childbirth and the greenhouseness occurs prevents that the uttering congestion happens. sent16: the fact that not the falsifying lightbulb but the dating ephedrine happens does not hold if the legalness occurs. sent17: both the redistribution and the translationalness happens. sent18: the technophilicness does not occur and the falsifying lightbulb does not occur if the dating ephedrine does not occur. sent19: if the nonsuppurativeness occurs the dating ephedrine does not occur and the legalness does not occur. sent20: the falsifying lightbulb does not occur if the technophilicness occurs and the greenhouse occurs. sent21: the dating ephedrine occurs. sent22: the unpronounceableness occurs. sent23: the legalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uttering childbirth occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the greenhouseness occurs.; sent3 -> int2: the technophilicness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the technophilicness occurs and the greenhouse occurs.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the falsifying lightbulb does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__