the exoskeleton is not a wolfsbane and is non-neurogenic.
sent1: the fact that the exoskeleton does reticulate and does not squeegee Hertz does not hold if the Cheviots pitches Nebuchadnezzar. sent2: the Cheviots does pitch Nebuchadnezzar if that the frontispiece is not a kind of a Scythian is not incorrect. sent3: if the frontispiece is not a tyrosine then the Cheviots pitches Nebuchadnezzar. sent4: that something squeegees clotheshorse and/or it is neurogenic does not hold if it is not specialistic. sent5: something is not a wolfsbane if that it does reticulate and does not squeegee Hertz is not correct. sent6: the frontispiece is not a tyrosine and/or is not Scythian if there exists something such that it is gastronomic. sent7: the toga does not squeegee clotheshorse if it is not specialistic. sent8: the toga is not specialistic. sent9: something is gastronomic. sent10: if that the toga squeegees clotheshorse and/or it is neurogenic is not true then the exoskeleton is not neurogenic.
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the frontispiece is not a tyrosine or it is not a kind of a Scythian or both.; int1 & sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the Cheviots does pitch Nebuchadnezzar.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the exoskeleton reticulates but it does not squeegee Hertz is wrong.; sent5 -> int4: the exoskeleton is not a wolfsbane if the fact that it is a kind of reticulate thing that does not squeegee Hertz is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the exoskeleton is not a kind of a wolfsbane.; sent4 -> int6: if the toga is not specialistic then that it does squeegee clotheshorse and/or it is neurogenic is not right.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the toga squeegees clotheshorse and/or it is neurogenic does not hold.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the exoskeleton is not neurogenic.; int5 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the exoskeleton is not a wolfsbane and is non-neurogenic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the exoskeleton does reticulate and does not squeegee Hertz does not hold if the Cheviots pitches Nebuchadnezzar. sent2: the Cheviots does pitch Nebuchadnezzar if that the frontispiece is not a kind of a Scythian is not incorrect. sent3: if the frontispiece is not a tyrosine then the Cheviots pitches Nebuchadnezzar. sent4: that something squeegees clotheshorse and/or it is neurogenic does not hold if it is not specialistic. sent5: something is not a wolfsbane if that it does reticulate and does not squeegee Hertz is not correct. sent6: the frontispiece is not a tyrosine and/or is not Scythian if there exists something such that it is gastronomic. sent7: the toga does not squeegee clotheshorse if it is not specialistic. sent8: the toga is not specialistic. sent9: something is gastronomic. sent10: if that the toga squeegees clotheshorse and/or it is neurogenic is not true then the exoskeleton is not neurogenic. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the frontispiece is not a tyrosine or it is not a kind of a Scythian or both.; int1 & sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the Cheviots does pitch Nebuchadnezzar.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the exoskeleton reticulates but it does not squeegee Hertz is wrong.; sent5 -> int4: the exoskeleton is not a wolfsbane if the fact that it is a kind of reticulate thing that does not squeegee Hertz is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the exoskeleton is not a kind of a wolfsbane.; sent4 -> int6: if the toga is not specialistic then that it does squeegee clotheshorse and/or it is neurogenic is not right.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the toga squeegees clotheshorse and/or it is neurogenic does not hold.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the exoskeleton is not neurogenic.; int5 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__