the twist is a lapdog.
sent1: if the hoofer is not a kind of a carnival and is not a alp the militarist is a kind of a alp. sent2: the twist is a sarcenet. sent3: if something that is a sarcenet is piscatorial then it is not spiritualistic. sent4: if the twist is not a cattleya and/or it is a lapdog it is cyclic. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is spiritualistic hold that the twist is not spiritualistic and is not a compulsive does not hold. sent6: if that the twist is not piscatorial and it is not spiritualistic is not right then the fact that the whizbang is piscatorial hold. sent7: the positioner does scent sarcenet. sent8: the twist is a lapdog if it compels hoofer. sent9: if the sultana is non-piscatorial the fact that the swimmeret is a kind of a lapdog and is a sarcenet is not right. sent10: the fact that that the twist is spiritualistic but it is not a kind of a compulsive is not true is correct. sent11: the fact that something is spiritualistic is not wrong. sent12: the fact that the sultana is non-spiritualistic thing that does not compel hoofer is wrong if the militarist is a alp. sent13: the swimmeret is a kind of a alp and/or is a lapdog. sent14: if there exists something such that it is spiritualistic then that that the twist is spiritualistic and is not a compulsive is not false is wrong. sent15: something is spiritualistic if that it is a kind of non-spiritualistic thing that is not a compulsive is not right. sent16: the twist is not paniculate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the twist is piscatorial hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the twist is a sarcenet and it is piscatorial.; sent3 -> int2: the twist is not spiritualistic if it is a sarcenet that is piscatorial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the twist is spiritualistic is not right.; sent15 -> int4: the twist is spiritualistic if the fact that it is not spiritualistic and it is not a kind of a compulsive is not correct.; sent11 & sent5 -> int5: that the twist is non-spiritualistic and it is not a compulsive is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the twist is spiritualistic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the twist is not piscatorial.; int8 -> int9: the twist is not piscatorial and/or does compel hoofer.;
the fact that the twist is not a lapdog is true.
$hypothesis$ = the twist is a lapdog. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hoofer is not a kind of a carnival and is not a alp the militarist is a kind of a alp. sent2: the twist is a sarcenet. sent3: if something that is a sarcenet is piscatorial then it is not spiritualistic. sent4: if the twist is not a cattleya and/or it is a lapdog it is cyclic. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is spiritualistic hold that the twist is not spiritualistic and is not a compulsive does not hold. sent6: if that the twist is not piscatorial and it is not spiritualistic is not right then the fact that the whizbang is piscatorial hold. sent7: the positioner does scent sarcenet. sent8: the twist is a lapdog if it compels hoofer. sent9: if the sultana is non-piscatorial the fact that the swimmeret is a kind of a lapdog and is a sarcenet is not right. sent10: the fact that that the twist is spiritualistic but it is not a kind of a compulsive is not true is correct. sent11: the fact that something is spiritualistic is not wrong. sent12: the fact that the sultana is non-spiritualistic thing that does not compel hoofer is wrong if the militarist is a alp. sent13: the swimmeret is a kind of a alp and/or is a lapdog. sent14: if there exists something such that it is spiritualistic then that that the twist is spiritualistic and is not a compulsive is not false is wrong. sent15: something is spiritualistic if that it is a kind of non-spiritualistic thing that is not a compulsive is not right. sent16: the twist is not paniculate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the twist is piscatorial hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the twist is a sarcenet and it is piscatorial.; sent3 -> int2: the twist is not spiritualistic if it is a sarcenet that is piscatorial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the twist is spiritualistic is not right.; sent15 -> int4: the twist is spiritualistic if the fact that it is not spiritualistic and it is not a kind of a compulsive is not correct.; sent11 & sent5 -> int5: that the twist is non-spiritualistic and it is not a compulsive is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the twist is spiritualistic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the twist is not piscatorial.; int8 -> int9: the twist is not piscatorial and/or does compel hoofer.; __UNKNOWN__