there exists something such that if it snags showgirl and it does not charm bartender then it does not charm stylet.
sent1: if the latitudinarian is a kind of a pharmacy but it does not invest it does not charm bartender. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of wilding thing that does not rack then it is not a piano. sent3: that there is something such that if it does snag showgirl and does not charm bartender it does charm stylet is correct. sent4: if the bartender snags showgirl and does not charm bartender then it does not charm stylet. sent5: the bartender does charm stylet if the fact that it snags showgirl and does not charm bartender is correct. sent6: if the peach is a kind of a Salmo that does not charm stylet then it does not dress. sent7: if a crosscut does not snag showgirl then it is not a nucleoside. sent8: if the bartender is a Cetoniidae and is not nonoperational it does not snag showgirl. sent9: if the bartender snags showgirl and it charms bartender then it does not charm stylet. sent10: if that the bartender rices Langside but it does not charm stylet hold it is not a kind of a Cupressaceae. sent11: the bartender is not birefringent if it does recumb and does not snag showgirl. sent12: there exists something such that if it snags showgirl and it charms bartender it does not charm stylet. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a sip but not a thallus it is not a thickhead. sent14: there is something such that if it is an anchor and it is not corneal then it is invertebrate.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
if the eelworm is a crosscut and does not snag showgirl then that it is not a nucleoside is correct.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it snags showgirl and it does not charm bartender then it does not charm stylet. ; $context$ = sent1: if the latitudinarian is a kind of a pharmacy but it does not invest it does not charm bartender. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of wilding thing that does not rack then it is not a piano. sent3: that there is something such that if it does snag showgirl and does not charm bartender it does charm stylet is correct. sent4: if the bartender snags showgirl and does not charm bartender then it does not charm stylet. sent5: the bartender does charm stylet if the fact that it snags showgirl and does not charm bartender is correct. sent6: if the peach is a kind of a Salmo that does not charm stylet then it does not dress. sent7: if a crosscut does not snag showgirl then it is not a nucleoside. sent8: if the bartender is a Cetoniidae and is not nonoperational it does not snag showgirl. sent9: if the bartender snags showgirl and it charms bartender then it does not charm stylet. sent10: if that the bartender rices Langside but it does not charm stylet hold it is not a kind of a Cupressaceae. sent11: the bartender is not birefringent if it does recumb and does not snag showgirl. sent12: there exists something such that if it snags showgirl and it charms bartender it does not charm stylet. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a sip but not a thallus it is not a thickhead. sent14: there is something such that if it is an anchor and it is not corneal then it is invertebrate. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__