the company does not perpetuate crayon.
sent1: the simulation does not perpetuate basidiolichen. sent2: that something does perpetuate crayon and is an eyepiece does not hold if it does not shaft Hyperion. sent3: something is orbital if that it shafts Hyperion hold. sent4: if the adesite is catechetical the company perpetuates crayon. sent5: that if the simulation does not perpetuate basidiolichen then the simulation is a traditionalist is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the simulation is a traditionalist but it is not orbital is false if the pollucite is orbital. sent7: if the adesite is not a kind of an eyepiece then the pollucite is either not catechetical or an eyepiece or both. sent8: the basidiolichen is an eyepiece if the fact that the pollucite is not orbital and does not shaft Hyperion is not correct. sent9: if the pollucite is a kind of an eyepiece then it does shaft Hyperion. sent10: if the photoconductivity is non-anagrammatic and/or is not a kind of an eyepiece then the adesite is catechetical. sent11: if something is an eyepiece it does not whomp or is not a kind of a times or both. sent12: if the pollucite is not a kind of an eyepiece the photoconductivity is not anagrammatic and/or is not a kind of an eyepiece. sent13: the photoconductivity is not anagrammatic and/or it is an eyepiece. sent14: something is both a traditionalist and not orbital if it does not perpetuate basidiolichen. sent15: The basidiolichen does not perpetuate simulation. sent16: something does not perpetuate crayon if that it perpetuate crayon and it is an eyepiece does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pollucite is a kind of an eyepiece.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the pollucite shafts Hyperion.; sent3 -> int2: if the pollucite does shaft Hyperion then it is orbital.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pollucite is orbital.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the simulation is a kind of a traditionalist but it is not orbital is not right.; sent14 -> int5: if the simulation does not perpetuate basidiolichen it is a kind of a traditionalist and it is not orbital.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the simulation is a traditionalist but it is not orbital.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the pollucite is not an eyepiece.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: either the photoconductivity is non-anagrammatic or it is not a kind of an eyepiece or both.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the adesite is catechetical.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the basidiolichen does not whomp or it is not a times or both.
sent11 -> int11: if the basidiolichen is an eyepiece then either it does not whomp or it is not a kind of a times or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the company does not perpetuate crayon. ; $context$ = sent1: the simulation does not perpetuate basidiolichen. sent2: that something does perpetuate crayon and is an eyepiece does not hold if it does not shaft Hyperion. sent3: something is orbital if that it shafts Hyperion hold. sent4: if the adesite is catechetical the company perpetuates crayon. sent5: that if the simulation does not perpetuate basidiolichen then the simulation is a traditionalist is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the simulation is a traditionalist but it is not orbital is false if the pollucite is orbital. sent7: if the adesite is not a kind of an eyepiece then the pollucite is either not catechetical or an eyepiece or both. sent8: the basidiolichen is an eyepiece if the fact that the pollucite is not orbital and does not shaft Hyperion is not correct. sent9: if the pollucite is a kind of an eyepiece then it does shaft Hyperion. sent10: if the photoconductivity is non-anagrammatic and/or is not a kind of an eyepiece then the adesite is catechetical. sent11: if something is an eyepiece it does not whomp or is not a kind of a times or both. sent12: if the pollucite is not a kind of an eyepiece the photoconductivity is not anagrammatic and/or is not a kind of an eyepiece. sent13: the photoconductivity is not anagrammatic and/or it is an eyepiece. sent14: something is both a traditionalist and not orbital if it does not perpetuate basidiolichen. sent15: The basidiolichen does not perpetuate simulation. sent16: something does not perpetuate crayon if that it perpetuate crayon and it is an eyepiece does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pollucite is a kind of an eyepiece.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the pollucite shafts Hyperion.; sent3 -> int2: if the pollucite does shaft Hyperion then it is orbital.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pollucite is orbital.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the simulation is a kind of a traditionalist but it is not orbital is not right.; sent14 -> int5: if the simulation does not perpetuate basidiolichen it is a kind of a traditionalist and it is not orbital.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the simulation is a traditionalist but it is not orbital.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the pollucite is not an eyepiece.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: either the photoconductivity is non-anagrammatic or it is not a kind of an eyepiece or both.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the adesite is catechetical.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__