if the fact that the propagation happens is not incorrect then the furloughing Braille occurs.
sent1: that the Wassermann does not occur leads to that the succession does not occur and the unpicking toggle does not occur. sent2: the Wassermann does not occur if that that the Wassermann happens and the tolerance does not occur is not right is correct. sent3: the Tantricness does not occur if that either the mistrial or the incarnation or both occurs is incorrect. sent4: the tunneling hydroxymethyl does not occur if the Tantricness does not occur. sent5: that not the propagation but the auscultation occurs results in that the furloughing Braille happens. sent6: the furloughing unpalatability happens. sent7: the auscultation does not occur. sent8: the fact that the furloughing Braille occurs if the fact that the propagation does not occur and the auscultation happens is not correct is correct. sent9: if the auscultation does not occur both the seasonableness and the propagation occurs. sent10: the auscultation does not occur and the furloughing Braille does not occur if the hajj occurs. sent11: the onsideness happens but the rapping does not occur if the furloughing unpalatability happens. sent12: both the hajj and the debuting Limulidae occurs if the succession does not occur. sent13: the fact that the mistrial occurs or the incarnation occurs or both does not hold if the rapping does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the propagation does not occur but the auscultation occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the propagation does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the propagation happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the propagation does not occur but the auscultation occurs is false.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the furloughing Braille occurs.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
not the tunneling hydroxymethyl but the seasonableness happens.
sent11 & sent6 -> int5: the onsideness happens but the rapping does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the rapping does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: that the mistrial and/or the incarnation happens does not hold.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the Tantricness does not occur.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the tunneling hydroxymethyl does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the propagation happens is not incorrect then the furloughing Braille occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Wassermann does not occur leads to that the succession does not occur and the unpicking toggle does not occur. sent2: the Wassermann does not occur if that that the Wassermann happens and the tolerance does not occur is not right is correct. sent3: the Tantricness does not occur if that either the mistrial or the incarnation or both occurs is incorrect. sent4: the tunneling hydroxymethyl does not occur if the Tantricness does not occur. sent5: that not the propagation but the auscultation occurs results in that the furloughing Braille happens. sent6: the furloughing unpalatability happens. sent7: the auscultation does not occur. sent8: the fact that the furloughing Braille occurs if the fact that the propagation does not occur and the auscultation happens is not correct is correct. sent9: if the auscultation does not occur both the seasonableness and the propagation occurs. sent10: the auscultation does not occur and the furloughing Braille does not occur if the hajj occurs. sent11: the onsideness happens but the rapping does not occur if the furloughing unpalatability happens. sent12: both the hajj and the debuting Limulidae occurs if the succession does not occur. sent13: the fact that the mistrial occurs or the incarnation occurs or both does not hold if the rapping does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the propagation does not occur but the auscultation occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the propagation does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the propagation happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the propagation does not occur but the auscultation occurs is false.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the furloughing Braille occurs.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__