the fact that there exists something such that if it is nominalistic then it does not mythologize reference and is not non-uptown is not right.
sent1: if the reference is undesirous it does not mythologize reference and does flesh alpha-interferon. sent2: if the roommate is nominalistic it does not flesh lithophyte. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is tactless is true then it is not dramatics. sent4: there exists something such that if it does flesh telescoped it does mythologize timidity and is conciliatory. sent5: there exists something such that if it is mild it is not a kind of a bloater. sent6: there exists something such that if it is nominalistic then it mythologizes reference and it is a kind of an uptown. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a thunderer then it is best and dermatologic. sent8: if the reference is nominalistic then it does not mythologize reference and it is an uptown. sent9: there is something such that if it is tannic then it is not telephonic. sent10: if the roadhog mythologizes racetrack then it is non-uptown. sent11: there is something such that if it undervalues it is not mandibulofacial and it is inelastic.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is nominalistic then it does not mythologize reference and is not non-uptown is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the reference is undesirous it does not mythologize reference and does flesh alpha-interferon. sent2: if the roommate is nominalistic it does not flesh lithophyte. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is tactless is true then it is not dramatics. sent4: there exists something such that if it does flesh telescoped it does mythologize timidity and is conciliatory. sent5: there exists something such that if it is mild it is not a kind of a bloater. sent6: there exists something such that if it is nominalistic then it mythologizes reference and it is a kind of an uptown. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a thunderer then it is best and dermatologic. sent8: if the reference is nominalistic then it does not mythologize reference and it is an uptown. sent9: there is something such that if it is tannic then it is not telephonic. sent10: if the roadhog mythologizes racetrack then it is non-uptown. sent11: there is something such that if it undervalues it is not mandibulofacial and it is inelastic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__