that that there exists something such that if it is not arborical and it is a ptyalism it does clank courtesy hold does not hold.
sent1: if the sissoo is not cubital but it is a Pizarro it does suspect. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is not non-arborical and it is a kind of a ptyalism is right it does clank courtesy. sent3: if something is not arborical but it is a ptyalism then the fact that it does clank courtesy is not false. sent4: if something that does not fragment burg is nonspherical then it is a omnivore. sent5: the sociologist metamorphoses if it is not a ptyalism and is electrochemical. sent6: something does transit if it is not a drop and it does fragment sissoo. sent7: if the sissoo is arborical and a ptyalism then it clanks courtesy. sent8: that something does clank courtesy if it is arborical and it is a ptyalism hold. sent9: there is something such that if it does not clank congregation and it does fragment Spark then it is a kind of a overexploitation.
sent3 -> int1: if the sissoo is both not arborical and a ptyalism then it does clank courtesy.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that there exists something such that if it is not arborical and it is a ptyalism it does clank courtesy hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sissoo is not cubital but it is a Pizarro it does suspect. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is not non-arborical and it is a kind of a ptyalism is right it does clank courtesy. sent3: if something is not arborical but it is a ptyalism then the fact that it does clank courtesy is not false. sent4: if something that does not fragment burg is nonspherical then it is a omnivore. sent5: the sociologist metamorphoses if it is not a ptyalism and is electrochemical. sent6: something does transit if it is not a drop and it does fragment sissoo. sent7: if the sissoo is arborical and a ptyalism then it clanks courtesy. sent8: that something does clank courtesy if it is arborical and it is a ptyalism hold. sent9: there is something such that if it does not clank congregation and it does fragment Spark then it is a kind of a overexploitation. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the sissoo is both not arborical and a ptyalism then it does clank courtesy.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__