the fact that the faro happens and the Frenchifying SCID does not occur is not wrong.
sent1: the phase-out occurs. sent2: the babel happens. sent3: the recurrence occurs. sent4: that the phase-out happens and the neuteringness occurs prevents that the recurrence occurs. sent5: if the non-neuteringness and the babel occurs the esophagealness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neuteringness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: both the phase-out and the neutering occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the recurrence does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the neutering does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the non-neuteringness and the babel occurs.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the esophagealness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the faro happens and the Frenchifying SCID does not occur is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the phase-out occurs. sent2: the babel happens. sent3: the recurrence occurs. sent4: that the phase-out happens and the neuteringness occurs prevents that the recurrence occurs. sent5: if the non-neuteringness and the babel occurs the esophagealness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neuteringness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: both the phase-out and the neutering occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the recurrence does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the neutering does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the non-neuteringness and the babel occurs.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the esophagealness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__