the scenicness occurs.
sent1: the devolution happens if that the devolution does not occur and the resection does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the connateness does not occur and/or the resection does not occur the connateness does not occur. sent3: the mismanagement happens. sent4: that the reprising rhizoid does not occur yields that the depersonalizing and the jumping occurs. sent5: if the connateness does not occur then that the agrologicness but not the disowning redneck occurs is not correct. sent6: that the agrologicness occurs and the depersonalizing occurs prevents that the scenicness happens. sent7: if the mismanagement does not occur that that the devolution does not occur and the resection does not occur hold is wrong. sent8: the disowning redneck occurs if that the agrologicness occurs and the disowning redneck does not occur is not correct. sent9: if the agrologicness does not occur the fact that the elegantness occurs but the disowning Mallon does not occur does not hold. sent10: the fact that if the agrologicness does not occur then the fact that the elegantness does not occur and the disowning Mallon does not occur is not right is true. sent11: if that the elegantness does not occur and the disowning Mallon does not occur is false then the connateness happens. sent12: the reprising rhizoid does not occur if the Shuhaness does not occur. sent13: the Shuhaness does not occur. sent14: if the mismanagement happens then the fact that the connateness occurs and/or the resection does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agrologicness does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the elegantness does not occur and the disowning Mallon does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the connateness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the connateness happens or the resection does not occur or both.; sent14 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the connateness happens or the resection does not occur or both does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the agrologicness occurs.; sent12 & sent13 -> int7: the reprising rhizoid does not occur.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the depersonalizing occurs and the jumping occurs.; int8 -> int9: the depersonalizing happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: both the agrologicness and the depersonalizing happens.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the devolution and the disowning redneck occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the scenicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the devolution happens if that the devolution does not occur and the resection does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the connateness does not occur and/or the resection does not occur the connateness does not occur. sent3: the mismanagement happens. sent4: that the reprising rhizoid does not occur yields that the depersonalizing and the jumping occurs. sent5: if the connateness does not occur then that the agrologicness but not the disowning redneck occurs is not correct. sent6: that the agrologicness occurs and the depersonalizing occurs prevents that the scenicness happens. sent7: if the mismanagement does not occur that that the devolution does not occur and the resection does not occur hold is wrong. sent8: the disowning redneck occurs if that the agrologicness occurs and the disowning redneck does not occur is not correct. sent9: if the agrologicness does not occur the fact that the elegantness occurs but the disowning Mallon does not occur does not hold. sent10: the fact that if the agrologicness does not occur then the fact that the elegantness does not occur and the disowning Mallon does not occur is not right is true. sent11: if that the elegantness does not occur and the disowning Mallon does not occur is false then the connateness happens. sent12: the reprising rhizoid does not occur if the Shuhaness does not occur. sent13: the Shuhaness does not occur. sent14: if the mismanagement happens then the fact that the connateness occurs and/or the resection does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agrologicness does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the elegantness does not occur and the disowning Mallon does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the connateness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the connateness happens or the resection does not occur or both.; sent14 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the connateness happens or the resection does not occur or both does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the agrologicness occurs.; sent12 & sent13 -> int7: the reprising rhizoid does not occur.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the depersonalizing occurs and the jumping occurs.; int8 -> int9: the depersonalizing happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: both the agrologicness and the depersonalizing happens.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__