there is something such that it is not a redneck but Lusitanian.
sent1: there is something such that it firebombs muser. sent2: that the imbrication is agrologic is correct if the peludo is unpermissive. sent3: if something is a daze it is unpermissive. sent4: there exists something such that it is exodontics. sent5: if something is a management it is unpermissive or is not agrologic or both. sent6: if the exocrine whistles colloquy it is Lusitanian. sent7: the Elamite is easy. sent8: the peludo does not whistle colloquy. sent9: The colloquy does not whistle peludo. sent10: if that the Elamite is not a kind of a management and is exodontics is not correct then the imbrication is a management. sent11: if the peludo does whistle earner then it is Lusitanian. sent12: the peludo is a daze if it is a redneck. sent13: if the peludo does not whistle colloquy then it is virile thing that does whistle earner. sent14: if there exists something such that it does firebomb muser then the exocrine either is virile or whistles colloquy or both. sent15: if the exocrine is Lusitanian then that the Elamite is both not a management and exodontics does not hold. sent16: the Elamite is a management if the imbrication is not non-agrologic. sent17: the Elamite is not a management if there exists something such that that it is exodontics is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peludo is a kind of a redneck.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the peludo is a daze.; sent3 -> int2: if the peludo is a daze it is unpermissive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the peludo is unpermissive.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the imbrication is not non-agrologic.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the Elamite is a kind of a management.; sent4 & sent17 -> int6: the Elamite is not a management.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the peludo is not a redneck.; sent13 & sent8 -> int9: the peludo is virile and does whistle earner.; int9 -> int10: the fact that the peludo whistles earner hold.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: the peludo is not non-Lusitanian.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the peludo is not a redneck but it is Lusitanian.; int12 -> hypothesis;
that the earner whistles earner is correct.
sent5 -> int13: if the imbrication is a management then that either it is not permissive or it is not agrologic or both is not wrong.; sent1 & sent14 -> int14: the exocrine is virile and/or it whistles colloquy.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not a redneck but Lusitanian. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it firebombs muser. sent2: that the imbrication is agrologic is correct if the peludo is unpermissive. sent3: if something is a daze it is unpermissive. sent4: there exists something such that it is exodontics. sent5: if something is a management it is unpermissive or is not agrologic or both. sent6: if the exocrine whistles colloquy it is Lusitanian. sent7: the Elamite is easy. sent8: the peludo does not whistle colloquy. sent9: The colloquy does not whistle peludo. sent10: if that the Elamite is not a kind of a management and is exodontics is not correct then the imbrication is a management. sent11: if the peludo does whistle earner then it is Lusitanian. sent12: the peludo is a daze if it is a redneck. sent13: if the peludo does not whistle colloquy then it is virile thing that does whistle earner. sent14: if there exists something such that it does firebomb muser then the exocrine either is virile or whistles colloquy or both. sent15: if the exocrine is Lusitanian then that the Elamite is both not a management and exodontics does not hold. sent16: the Elamite is a management if the imbrication is not non-agrologic. sent17: the Elamite is not a management if there exists something such that that it is exodontics is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peludo is a kind of a redneck.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the peludo is a daze.; sent3 -> int2: if the peludo is a daze it is unpermissive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the peludo is unpermissive.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the imbrication is not non-agrologic.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the Elamite is a kind of a management.; sent4 & sent17 -> int6: the Elamite is not a management.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the peludo is not a redneck.; sent13 & sent8 -> int9: the peludo is virile and does whistle earner.; int9 -> int10: the fact that the peludo whistles earner hold.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: the peludo is not non-Lusitanian.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the peludo is not a redneck but it is Lusitanian.; int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__