the fact that there is something such that if that it does not desexualize Hexanchus is not wrong the fact that it is non-spousal thing that is alphanumeric does not hold is incorrect.
sent1: that something is not a kind of a microfarad but it is configurational is not right if the fact that it is not alphanumeric is correct. sent2: the fact that something is not spousal but it is alphanumeric does not hold if that it does not desexualize Hexanchus is not wrong. sent3: something is non-spousal but it is alphanumeric if it does not desexualize Hexanchus.
sent2 -> int1: that the firebreak is not spousal but it is alphanumeric is not right if it does not desexualize Hexanchus.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the saltshaker is not alphanumeric the fact that it is not a kind of a microfarad and it is configurational is incorrect.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it does not desexualize Hexanchus is not wrong the fact that it is non-spousal thing that is alphanumeric does not hold is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a kind of a microfarad but it is configurational is not right if the fact that it is not alphanumeric is correct. sent2: the fact that something is not spousal but it is alphanumeric does not hold if that it does not desexualize Hexanchus is not wrong. sent3: something is non-spousal but it is alphanumeric if it does not desexualize Hexanchus. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: that the firebreak is not spousal but it is alphanumeric is not right if it does not desexualize Hexanchus.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__