that there exists something such that if that it is non-apologetic thing that does mound Wykehamist is false then it does desexualize bars is not true.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a toy but inextinguishable is incorrect then it does desexualize Hydrophidae. sent2: if that something does not mound pichiciago but it is a basophil is not correct then it is a Blighty. sent3: that the raven does desexualize bars is correct if it is apologetic. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a pressmark that is utopian is not right then it is a lean-to. sent5: the Mainer is filial if it does not pique and mounds Wykehamist. sent6: there exists something such that if it echoes then it does mound Mendelsohn. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not inextinguishable and it is Modern is wrong it is a casualness. sent8: there exists something such that if it is apologetic it desexualizes bars. sent9: if that the raven is a kind of unapologetic thing that does mound Wykehamist is not correct then it desexualizes bars. sent10: there is something such that if that it does desexualize popper and is a kind of a Tyne is not true then it is a mush. sent11: if the fact that the sunrise is a kind of non-horary thing that is incorporeal is wrong that it does desexualize bars is true. sent12: there is something such that if it does not urticate Ariidae and is caulescent it dwells. sent13: there exists something such that if it is non-apologetic thing that does mound Wykehamist that it desexualizes bars is right. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not inextinguishable and it desexualizes Cardamine is not correct it is a destitution.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it does not mound pichiciago and is a basophil is not true it is a kind of a Blighty.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the fugu does not mound pichiciago but it is a basophil does not hold it is a Blighty.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it is non-apologetic thing that does mound Wykehamist is false then it does desexualize bars is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a toy but inextinguishable is incorrect then it does desexualize Hydrophidae. sent2: if that something does not mound pichiciago but it is a basophil is not correct then it is a Blighty. sent3: that the raven does desexualize bars is correct if it is apologetic. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a pressmark that is utopian is not right then it is a lean-to. sent5: the Mainer is filial if it does not pique and mounds Wykehamist. sent6: there exists something such that if it echoes then it does mound Mendelsohn. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not inextinguishable and it is Modern is wrong it is a casualness. sent8: there exists something such that if it is apologetic it desexualizes bars. sent9: if that the raven is a kind of unapologetic thing that does mound Wykehamist is not correct then it desexualizes bars. sent10: there is something such that if that it does desexualize popper and is a kind of a Tyne is not true then it is a mush. sent11: if the fact that the sunrise is a kind of non-horary thing that is incorporeal is wrong that it does desexualize bars is true. sent12: there is something such that if it does not urticate Ariidae and is caulescent it dwells. sent13: there exists something such that if it is non-apologetic thing that does mound Wykehamist that it desexualizes bars is right. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not inextinguishable and it desexualizes Cardamine is not correct it is a destitution. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__