that the withholder is a corruptibility or it is not a yakuza or both is not false.
sent1: that the breadroot is a kind of a yakuza or is a kind of a corruptibility or both is not wrong if the withholder is not a corruptibility. sent2: if the breadroot is not a kind of a corruptibility then either the withholder is a yakuza or it is not a corruptibility or both. sent3: something is a negus if that it is not a negus and it is a brace is not correct. sent4: the withholder braces. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a corruptibility and it is not torrential does not hold then the breadroot is a kind of a corruptibility. sent6: if the withholder is not a yakuza then the breadroot is a corruptibility and/or is not a yakuza. sent7: the fact that something is not a corruptibility and is not torrential is not correct if it is a brace. sent8: if something is a yakuza it does stub monetarist or it is not a kind of a scape or both. sent9: the withholder is a corruptibility and/or it is a kind of a yakuza. sent10: the breadroot does curb doxology or it does not dribble or both. sent11: if the fact that something is both not a negus and not a yakuza is wrong it is a yakuza. sent12: the breadroot is not a kind of a yakuza if there is something such that that it does not curb doxology is not wrong. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does interpose powered and it curbs doxology is incorrect. sent14: the withholder is a corruptibility and/or it is not a yakuza if the breadroot is not a yakuza. sent15: something interposes powered and does curb doxology. sent16: if the breadroot is a negus the fact that the withholder is a corruptibility or it is not a yakuza or both does not hold.
that the blucher stubs monetarist and/or it is not a kind of a scape hold.
sent8 -> int1: either the blucher stubs monetarist or it is not a scape or both if it is a yakuza.; sent11 -> int2: that the blucher is a yakuza hold if that it is not a negus and is not a kind of a yakuza is not correct.; sent7 -> int3: if the withholder braces the fact that it is not a corruptibility and it is not torrential does not hold.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the withholder is not a kind of a corruptibility and it is not torrential is not right.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is not a corruptibility and not torrential does not hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the breadroot is a kind of a corruptibility.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a kind of a corruptibility.;
$hypothesis$ = that the withholder is a corruptibility or it is not a yakuza or both is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the breadroot is a kind of a yakuza or is a kind of a corruptibility or both is not wrong if the withholder is not a corruptibility. sent2: if the breadroot is not a kind of a corruptibility then either the withholder is a yakuza or it is not a corruptibility or both. sent3: something is a negus if that it is not a negus and it is a brace is not correct. sent4: the withholder braces. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a corruptibility and it is not torrential does not hold then the breadroot is a kind of a corruptibility. sent6: if the withholder is not a yakuza then the breadroot is a corruptibility and/or is not a yakuza. sent7: the fact that something is not a corruptibility and is not torrential is not correct if it is a brace. sent8: if something is a yakuza it does stub monetarist or it is not a kind of a scape or both. sent9: the withholder is a corruptibility and/or it is a kind of a yakuza. sent10: the breadroot does curb doxology or it does not dribble or both. sent11: if the fact that something is both not a negus and not a yakuza is wrong it is a yakuza. sent12: the breadroot is not a kind of a yakuza if there is something such that that it does not curb doxology is not wrong. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does interpose powered and it curbs doxology is incorrect. sent14: the withholder is a corruptibility and/or it is not a yakuza if the breadroot is not a yakuza. sent15: something interposes powered and does curb doxology. sent16: if the breadroot is a negus the fact that the withholder is a corruptibility or it is not a yakuza or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__