the sort is uncontroversial.
sent1: the Haida is synonymous. sent2: if something is dichromatic it is not sectorial. sent3: the fact that the sort is a kind of a stuffed is correct. sent4: the cabstand disabuses cabstand and is not a kind of a ctenophore if the harpsichord is anticlimactic. sent5: that the sort does not stuff is not incorrect if it is a Galileo and it does hand Christianity. sent6: if the Haida is synonymous then it is catkinate and it is not other. sent7: if there exists something such that that it hands Christianity and is not dichromatic is not correct then that the bumblebee is not uncontroversial is not false. sent8: if the tempera does not hand hypocorism the bumblebee is side-to-side and it is a stuffed. sent9: if something is catkinate then the fact that it hands Christianity and it is not dichromatic does not hold. sent10: the cabstand is not positional if it does disabuse cabstand and it is not a ctenophore. sent11: that the harpsichord is not non-anticlimactic and is cytokinetic is true. sent12: The Christianity does hand sort. sent13: if the fact that the sort is dichromatic is false then it is not uncontroversial. sent14: if something is dichromatic it is not sectorial and it is a Galileo. sent15: the sort does hand Christianity. sent16: if there is something such that it is not positional then the tempera does not hand hypocorism.
sent14 -> int1: the sort is not sectorial but it is a kind of a Galileo if that it is dichromatic is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the sort is dichromatic is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sort is a kind of non-sectorial a Galileo.; int2 -> int3: the sort is a Galileo.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the sort is a Galileo that hands Christianity.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the sort is not a stuffed is right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the sort is non-dichromatic.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the bumblebee is not uncontroversial but it is side-to-side.
sent9 -> int8: the fact that the Haida hands Christianity but it is non-dichromatic is wrong if it is catkinate.; sent6 & sent1 -> int9: the Haida is catkinate but it is not other.; int9 -> int10: the Haida is catkinate.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the Haida does hand Christianity but it is not dichromatic is not correct.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it hands Christianity and is non-dichromatic is false.; int12 & sent7 -> int13: the fact that the bumblebee is not uncontroversial is not incorrect.; sent11 -> int14: the harpsichord is anticlimactic.; sent4 & int14 -> int15: the cabstand does disabuse cabstand and is not a ctenophore.; sent10 & int15 -> int16: that the cabstand is not positional is not incorrect.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that that it is not positional hold.; int17 & sent16 -> int18: the tempera does not hand hypocorism.; sent8 & int18 -> int19: the bumblebee is side-to-side and a stuffed.; int19 -> int20: the bumblebee is side-to-side.; int13 & int20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sort is uncontroversial. ; $context$ = sent1: the Haida is synonymous. sent2: if something is dichromatic it is not sectorial. sent3: the fact that the sort is a kind of a stuffed is correct. sent4: the cabstand disabuses cabstand and is not a kind of a ctenophore if the harpsichord is anticlimactic. sent5: that the sort does not stuff is not incorrect if it is a Galileo and it does hand Christianity. sent6: if the Haida is synonymous then it is catkinate and it is not other. sent7: if there exists something such that that it hands Christianity and is not dichromatic is not correct then that the bumblebee is not uncontroversial is not false. sent8: if the tempera does not hand hypocorism the bumblebee is side-to-side and it is a stuffed. sent9: if something is catkinate then the fact that it hands Christianity and it is not dichromatic does not hold. sent10: the cabstand is not positional if it does disabuse cabstand and it is not a ctenophore. sent11: that the harpsichord is not non-anticlimactic and is cytokinetic is true. sent12: The Christianity does hand sort. sent13: if the fact that the sort is dichromatic is false then it is not uncontroversial. sent14: if something is dichromatic it is not sectorial and it is a Galileo. sent15: the sort does hand Christianity. sent16: if there is something such that it is not positional then the tempera does not hand hypocorism. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the sort is not sectorial but it is a kind of a Galileo if that it is dichromatic is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the sort is dichromatic is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sort is a kind of non-sectorial a Galileo.; int2 -> int3: the sort is a Galileo.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the sort is a Galileo that hands Christianity.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the sort is not a stuffed is right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the sort is non-dichromatic.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__