the cycle does flake publication.
sent1: something is not a kind of a immovability but it emaciates if it is a Tussilago. sent2: the thalidomide overuses skim if the pyridoxine tips Prosopium. sent3: if the cycle does impale and it does flake publication the thalidomide is not lactogenic. sent4: the cycle is pyloric. sent5: if the cycle is not lactogenic it impales. sent6: if the cycle does not impale the thalidomide does flake publication and is pyloric. sent7: something substantiates and/or it is lactogenic if it is not a immovability. sent8: there is something such that it is a Roberts. sent9: the fact that the thalidomide is lactogenic if the thalidomide does not overuse skim is right. sent10: if a non-lactogenic thing does not impale it is not pyloric. sent11: if the pyridoxine substantiates the thalidomide does substantiates. sent12: The fact that the skim does not overuse thalidomide is not wrong. sent13: if the pyridoxine is lactogenic the thalidomide does substantiate. sent14: the pyridoxine is a Tussilago but not a Ilex if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Roberts. sent15: the fact that the thalidomide does not overuse skim is not wrong. sent16: something is not lactogenic and does not impale if it overuses skim. sent17: the pyridoxine does tip Prosopium and is a immovability if it does not emaciate. sent18: the cycle impales if it is pyloric.
sent18 & sent4 -> int1: the cycle does impale.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cycle does flake publication.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cycle impales and it flakes publication.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the thalidomide is not lactogenic.; sent9 & sent15 -> int4: the thalidomide is lactogenic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the cycle flakes publication hold.
sent10 -> int6: if the thalidomide is a kind of non-lactogenic thing that does not impale it is not pyloric.; sent16 -> int7: the thalidomide is a kind of non-lactogenic thing that does not impale if it overuses skim.;
$hypothesis$ = the cycle does flake publication. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a immovability but it emaciates if it is a Tussilago. sent2: the thalidomide overuses skim if the pyridoxine tips Prosopium. sent3: if the cycle does impale and it does flake publication the thalidomide is not lactogenic. sent4: the cycle is pyloric. sent5: if the cycle is not lactogenic it impales. sent6: if the cycle does not impale the thalidomide does flake publication and is pyloric. sent7: something substantiates and/or it is lactogenic if it is not a immovability. sent8: there is something such that it is a Roberts. sent9: the fact that the thalidomide is lactogenic if the thalidomide does not overuse skim is right. sent10: if a non-lactogenic thing does not impale it is not pyloric. sent11: if the pyridoxine substantiates the thalidomide does substantiates. sent12: The fact that the skim does not overuse thalidomide is not wrong. sent13: if the pyridoxine is lactogenic the thalidomide does substantiate. sent14: the pyridoxine is a Tussilago but not a Ilex if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Roberts. sent15: the fact that the thalidomide does not overuse skim is not wrong. sent16: something is not lactogenic and does not impale if it overuses skim. sent17: the pyridoxine does tip Prosopium and is a immovability if it does not emaciate. sent18: the cycle impales if it is pyloric. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent4 -> int1: the cycle does impale.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cycle does flake publication.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cycle impales and it flakes publication.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the thalidomide is not lactogenic.; sent9 & sent15 -> int4: the thalidomide is lactogenic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__