the nourishing does not occur and the trooping capaciousness happens.
sent1: if that the incorporating does not occur and the deep-seaness does not occur is wrong the incorporating happens. sent2: if the fact that the trooping mezzo-soprano and the tormenting Georgia occurs hold the incorporating does not occur. sent3: that the variegation does not occur is prevented by the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene. sent4: if that the variegation occurs and the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene happens is false then the fact that the variegation does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the trooping capaciousness occurs. sent6: that the mistaking capaciousness happens and the rust happens is triggered by that the tormenting Georgia does not occur. sent7: the trooping naturalism happens if the fact that the tormenting Georgia does not occur and the trooping mezzo-soprano does not occur does not hold. sent8: the fact that the intrigue occurs hold. sent9: if the trooping mezzo-soprano does not occur then the fact that not the nourishing but the trooping capaciousness occurs is not right. sent10: the trooping mezzo-soprano happens. sent11: the fact that not the rust but the variegation happens is incorrect if the trooping capaciousness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the tormenting Georgia does not occur and the trooping mezzo-soprano does not occur is not right if the nourishing happens. sent13: that the trooping capaciousness and the nonlexicalness occurs is false if the rampage does not occur. sent14: that the deep-sea does not occur causes that the nourishing occurs and the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene occurs. sent15: the fact that the incorporating does not occur and the deep-sea does not occur is not true. sent16: the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene and the nonlexicalness happens. sent17: if the laugh does not occur and/or the deep-seaness does not occur the deep-seaness does not occur. sent18: if the fact that both the trooping capaciousness and the nonlexicalness occurs is wrong the trooping capaciousness does not occur. sent19: the nonlexicalness happens. sent20: the citrousness occurs and/or the crucifying does not occur if the intrigue happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tormenting Georgia occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: both the trooping mezzo-soprano and the tormenting Georgia happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the incorporating does not occur.; sent1 & sent15 -> int3: the incorporating occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the tormenting Georgia does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: both the mistaking capaciousness and the rusting happens.; int6 -> int7: the mistaking capaciousness occurs.; sent16 -> int8: the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene happens.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the variegation occurs.; int7 & int9 -> int10: both the variegation and the mistaking capaciousness happens.;
the fact that the nourishing does not occur and the trooping capaciousness happens is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the nourishing does not occur and the trooping capaciousness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the incorporating does not occur and the deep-seaness does not occur is wrong the incorporating happens. sent2: if the fact that the trooping mezzo-soprano and the tormenting Georgia occurs hold the incorporating does not occur. sent3: that the variegation does not occur is prevented by the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene. sent4: if that the variegation occurs and the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene happens is false then the fact that the variegation does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the trooping capaciousness occurs. sent6: that the mistaking capaciousness happens and the rust happens is triggered by that the tormenting Georgia does not occur. sent7: the trooping naturalism happens if the fact that the tormenting Georgia does not occur and the trooping mezzo-soprano does not occur does not hold. sent8: the fact that the intrigue occurs hold. sent9: if the trooping mezzo-soprano does not occur then the fact that not the nourishing but the trooping capaciousness occurs is not right. sent10: the trooping mezzo-soprano happens. sent11: the fact that not the rust but the variegation happens is incorrect if the trooping capaciousness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the tormenting Georgia does not occur and the trooping mezzo-soprano does not occur is not right if the nourishing happens. sent13: that the trooping capaciousness and the nonlexicalness occurs is false if the rampage does not occur. sent14: that the deep-sea does not occur causes that the nourishing occurs and the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene occurs. sent15: the fact that the incorporating does not occur and the deep-sea does not occur is not true. sent16: the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene and the nonlexicalness happens. sent17: if the laugh does not occur and/or the deep-seaness does not occur the deep-seaness does not occur. sent18: if the fact that both the trooping capaciousness and the nonlexicalness occurs is wrong the trooping capaciousness does not occur. sent19: the nonlexicalness happens. sent20: the citrousness occurs and/or the crucifying does not occur if the intrigue happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tormenting Georgia occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: both the trooping mezzo-soprano and the tormenting Georgia happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the incorporating does not occur.; sent1 & sent15 -> int3: the incorporating occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the tormenting Georgia does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: both the mistaking capaciousness and the rusting happens.; int6 -> int7: the mistaking capaciousness occurs.; sent16 -> int8: the mistaking tetrafluoroethylene happens.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the variegation occurs.; int7 & int9 -> int10: both the variegation and the mistaking capaciousness happens.; __UNKNOWN__