the buttocks is not provencal but amitotic.
sent1: the stiff does wend. sent2: the buttocks does not extrapolate. sent3: the heartwood is redemptive if the Fossa centers. sent4: if that the IOL does not cock is correct then that the Fossa is a Houyhnhnms hold. sent5: there is something such that it does not undertake. sent6: if the IOL is amitotic that the stiff does undertake and it is amitotic is not right. sent7: the stiff does not undertake. sent8: something does extrapolate and does not undertake. sent9: the tamarin is not redemptive. sent10: the fact that the IOL does extrapolate is correct. sent11: if the buttocks is not a Houyhnhnms then the stiff is provencal and extrapolates. sent12: the buttocks is a centering. sent13: if that the numerologist does not undertake hold then the stiff does wend. sent14: if something that does not extrapolate does not undertake the numerologist does not wend. sent15: that the buttocks is not provencal but it is amitotic does not hold if the fact that that the IOL is not amitotic is not false is false. sent16: there is something such that it does not extrapolate. sent17: if the alphabetizer is not amitotic that it is not a cock but redemptive is not false. sent18: if the IOL is not provencal it either pipes langley or does wend or both. sent19: the stiff does not extrapolate and it does not undertake. sent20: the numerologist does wend if the heartwood is redemptive. sent21: something is amitotic if it is a cock. sent22: if something is redemptive then it does cock. sent23: the Fossa is a kind of a centering and it is a Houyhnhnms if the IOL does not cock.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the IOL does not cock.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the Fossa is a centering and it is a kind of a Houyhnhnms.; int1 -> int2: the Fossa does center.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the heartwood is redemptive is not false.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the fact that the numerologist wends is not wrong.; sent19 -> int5: there is something such that it does not extrapolate and it does not undertake.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the numerologist does not wend.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the IOL is a cock is not incorrect.; sent21 -> int9: if the IOL is a cock then it is amitotic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the IOL is amitotic is not incorrect.; int10 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the buttocks is not provencal but it is amitotic.
sent22 -> int11: the buttocks does cock if it is redemptive.;
$hypothesis$ = the buttocks is not provencal but amitotic. ; $context$ = sent1: the stiff does wend. sent2: the buttocks does not extrapolate. sent3: the heartwood is redemptive if the Fossa centers. sent4: if that the IOL does not cock is correct then that the Fossa is a Houyhnhnms hold. sent5: there is something such that it does not undertake. sent6: if the IOL is amitotic that the stiff does undertake and it is amitotic is not right. sent7: the stiff does not undertake. sent8: something does extrapolate and does not undertake. sent9: the tamarin is not redemptive. sent10: the fact that the IOL does extrapolate is correct. sent11: if the buttocks is not a Houyhnhnms then the stiff is provencal and extrapolates. sent12: the buttocks is a centering. sent13: if that the numerologist does not undertake hold then the stiff does wend. sent14: if something that does not extrapolate does not undertake the numerologist does not wend. sent15: that the buttocks is not provencal but it is amitotic does not hold if the fact that that the IOL is not amitotic is not false is false. sent16: there is something such that it does not extrapolate. sent17: if the alphabetizer is not amitotic that it is not a cock but redemptive is not false. sent18: if the IOL is not provencal it either pipes langley or does wend or both. sent19: the stiff does not extrapolate and it does not undertake. sent20: the numerologist does wend if the heartwood is redemptive. sent21: something is amitotic if it is a cock. sent22: if something is redemptive then it does cock. sent23: the Fossa is a kind of a centering and it is a Houyhnhnms if the IOL does not cock. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the IOL does not cock.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the Fossa is a centering and it is a kind of a Houyhnhnms.; int1 -> int2: the Fossa does center.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the heartwood is redemptive is not false.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the fact that the numerologist wends is not wrong.; sent19 -> int5: there is something such that it does not extrapolate and it does not undertake.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the numerologist does not wend.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the IOL is a cock is not incorrect.; sent21 -> int9: if the IOL is a cock then it is amitotic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the IOL is amitotic is not incorrect.; int10 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__