the fact that that the drivel does sensitize wpm but it is not a jaconet is not correct hold if the gizzard is Singhalese.
sent1: that the drivel sensitizes wpm and it is a kind of a jaconet is not right. sent2: the spermatocyte sensitizes toilet but it does not domesticate. sent3: the fact that the fact that the drivel is a kind of brimless thing that does not tarnish does not hold if the gizzard is a kind of a jaconet is right. sent4: the gizzard is brimless. sent5: if something that is not a kind of a tarnish is brimless then it is a jaconet. sent6: the drivel does sensitize wpm but it is not a kind of a jaconet if the gizzard is a jaconet. sent7: that the gizzard does not japan selloff and is a Caucasian is not incorrect. sent8: if the gizzard is Singhalese then it is both not a tarnish and brimless. sent9: the fact that the drivel sensitizes wpm but it is not a kind of a jaconet is wrong if the gizzard is a jaconet. sent10: the drivel is not a jaconet and sensitizes wpm if it does tarnish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gizzard is Singhalese is true.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the gizzard is not a tarnish but it is brimless.; sent5 -> int2: the gizzard is a jaconet if it does not tarnish and it is brimless.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gizzard is a jaconet.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the drivel sensitizes wpm and is not a jaconet is not incorrect is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the drivel does sensitize wpm but it is not a jaconet is not correct hold if the gizzard is Singhalese. ; $context$ = sent1: that the drivel sensitizes wpm and it is a kind of a jaconet is not right. sent2: the spermatocyte sensitizes toilet but it does not domesticate. sent3: the fact that the fact that the drivel is a kind of brimless thing that does not tarnish does not hold if the gizzard is a kind of a jaconet is right. sent4: the gizzard is brimless. sent5: if something that is not a kind of a tarnish is brimless then it is a jaconet. sent6: the drivel does sensitize wpm but it is not a kind of a jaconet if the gizzard is a jaconet. sent7: that the gizzard does not japan selloff and is a Caucasian is not incorrect. sent8: if the gizzard is Singhalese then it is both not a tarnish and brimless. sent9: the fact that the drivel sensitizes wpm but it is not a kind of a jaconet is wrong if the gizzard is a jaconet. sent10: the drivel is not a jaconet and sensitizes wpm if it does tarnish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gizzard is Singhalese is true.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the gizzard is not a tarnish but it is brimless.; sent5 -> int2: the gizzard is a jaconet if it does not tarnish and it is brimless.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gizzard is a jaconet.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the drivel sensitizes wpm and is not a jaconet is not incorrect is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__