the tendril transitivizes.
sent1: the washstand does destalinize Burnett if it is unready and is a Gavialidae. sent2: if the washstand is non-unready a Gavialidae then it destalinizes Burnett. sent3: if that the crook does not blossom is not incorrect the washstand does bond. sent4: the elegist is not a kind of a protohistory if it is a kind of a homestretch that is not non-antigenic. sent5: the wrestler is not a ACE. sent6: if there is something such that it is a Hardy then the fact that the crook does not chamber and blossoms is wrong. sent7: there is something such that it is a Hardy. sent8: the justiciar reruns hyperadrenalism if the crook is not a Hardy and/or it does reruns hyperadrenalism. sent9: the washstand does not rerun hyperadrenalism if it bonds and it is antigenic. sent10: if the fact that the crook does not chamber but it does blossom is not correct then the washstand is a bonding. sent11: if the wrestler is not a ACE the washstand is non-unready thing that is a Gavialidae. sent12: the washstand is antigenic. sent13: the washstand is an introduction if it does not rerun hyperadrenalism and it does destalinize Burnett.
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the crook does not chamber but it does blossom is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the washstand is a bonding.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the washstand is a bonding and it is antigenic.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the washstand does not rerun hyperadrenalism is right.; sent11 & sent5 -> int5: the washstand is not unready and is a Gavialidae.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the washstand does destalinize Burnett.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the washstand does not rerun hyperadrenalism but it destalinizes Burnett.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the fact that the washstand is a kind of an introduction is true.;
the fact that the justiciar does rerun hyperadrenalism is right.
$hypothesis$ = the tendril transitivizes. ; $context$ = sent1: the washstand does destalinize Burnett if it is unready and is a Gavialidae. sent2: if the washstand is non-unready a Gavialidae then it destalinizes Burnett. sent3: if that the crook does not blossom is not incorrect the washstand does bond. sent4: the elegist is not a kind of a protohistory if it is a kind of a homestretch that is not non-antigenic. sent5: the wrestler is not a ACE. sent6: if there is something such that it is a Hardy then the fact that the crook does not chamber and blossoms is wrong. sent7: there is something such that it is a Hardy. sent8: the justiciar reruns hyperadrenalism if the crook is not a Hardy and/or it does reruns hyperadrenalism. sent9: the washstand does not rerun hyperadrenalism if it bonds and it is antigenic. sent10: if the fact that the crook does not chamber but it does blossom is not correct then the washstand is a bonding. sent11: if the wrestler is not a ACE the washstand is non-unready thing that is a Gavialidae. sent12: the washstand is antigenic. sent13: the washstand is an introduction if it does not rerun hyperadrenalism and it does destalinize Burnett. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the crook does not chamber but it does blossom is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the washstand is a bonding.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the washstand is a bonding and it is antigenic.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the washstand does not rerun hyperadrenalism is right.; sent11 & sent5 -> int5: the washstand is not unready and is a Gavialidae.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the washstand does destalinize Burnett.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the washstand does not rerun hyperadrenalism but it destalinizes Burnett.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the fact that the washstand is a kind of an introduction is true.; __UNKNOWN__