that there is something such that if that it does not criticize tractor hold the fact that it is not a gear and it is not nihilistic is not true is not true.
sent1: if something does not criticize tractor then that it is both not a gear and not nihilistic is not true. sent2: if something does not criticize tractor the fact that it does gear and it is non-nihilistic is not right. sent3: the fact that the foreshock is a defloration but it is not a gear is not correct if it is not a Phalangiidae. sent4: if the foreshock is not Coleridgian it is a kind of non-nihilistic thing that does not blemish. sent5: if the foreshock is not an opacity the fact that it is not a schooling and it is a kind of a gear does not hold. sent6: that the foreshock is not nihilistic but it is Coleridgian does not hold if it does not heap briber. sent7: if the monkshood is not nihilistic it is not a desperation and it is not quadrangular. sent8: the foreshock is not a gear and it does not lob escalader if the fact that it is not a kind of a cellulosic is right. sent9: if something is not quadrangular that it does not subscribe and heaps academicianship is not right. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not criticize tractor hold it is not a kind of a gear and it is not nihilistic. sent11: there exists something such that if it criticizes tractor then the fact that it is not a kind of a gear and it is not nihilistic is wrong.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the foreshock does not gear and it is not nihilistic does not hold if it does not criticize tractor.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it does not criticize tractor hold the fact that it is not a gear and it is not nihilistic is not true is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not criticize tractor then that it is both not a gear and not nihilistic is not true. sent2: if something does not criticize tractor the fact that it does gear and it is non-nihilistic is not right. sent3: the fact that the foreshock is a defloration but it is not a gear is not correct if it is not a Phalangiidae. sent4: if the foreshock is not Coleridgian it is a kind of non-nihilistic thing that does not blemish. sent5: if the foreshock is not an opacity the fact that it is not a schooling and it is a kind of a gear does not hold. sent6: that the foreshock is not nihilistic but it is Coleridgian does not hold if it does not heap briber. sent7: if the monkshood is not nihilistic it is not a desperation and it is not quadrangular. sent8: the foreshock is not a gear and it does not lob escalader if the fact that it is not a kind of a cellulosic is right. sent9: if something is not quadrangular that it does not subscribe and heaps academicianship is not right. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not criticize tractor hold it is not a kind of a gear and it is not nihilistic. sent11: there exists something such that if it criticizes tractor then the fact that it is not a kind of a gear and it is not nihilistic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the foreshock does not gear and it is not nihilistic does not hold if it does not criticize tractor.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__