the guarding happens.
sent1: the algorithmicness happens. sent2: both the algorithmicness and the nark happens. sent3: if the nark and the hydropathy occurs then the guard does not occur. sent4: that both the on-the-jobness and the melee occurs is brought about by that the resettlement does not occur. sent5: the bestirring monolith does not occur. sent6: the hydropathy is brought about by the tying. sent7: that the algorithmicness and the non-anophelineness happens does not hold if the pratfall happens. sent8: both the cataleptic and the liquefying medley occurs. sent9: if the distinctness happens then the fact that the instrumentation happens hold. sent10: the abundantness happens if the motivationalness happens. sent11: that both the pratfall and the Belgian occurs is caused by that the bestirring biochemistry does not occur. sent12: the deserting does not occur. sent13: the Mormon occurs and the hydropathy happens if the nark does not occur. sent14: the liquefying ricochet happens. sent15: that the guarding does not occur is prevented by that the tying occurs. sent16: if the Mormonness happens then the hydropathy happens. sent17: the deregulation occurs and the intelligibleness happens. sent18: the dislocation and the bestirring Northampton occurs. sent19: both the archdiocesanness and the reincarnation happens. sent20: if the on-the-jobness occurs the tan does not occur and the bestirring biochemistry does not occur. sent21: the outweighing happens and the amazing happens. sent22: both the salableness and the Amharicness occurs. sent23: the tying and/or the Mormonness happens. sent24: if the fact that the algorithmicness and the non-anophelineness happens is not right the nark does not occur.
sent23 & sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the hydropathy occurs.; sent2 -> int2: the narking happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the nark and the hydropathy occurs is true.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the guarding happens.
$hypothesis$ = the guarding happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the algorithmicness happens. sent2: both the algorithmicness and the nark happens. sent3: if the nark and the hydropathy occurs then the guard does not occur. sent4: that both the on-the-jobness and the melee occurs is brought about by that the resettlement does not occur. sent5: the bestirring monolith does not occur. sent6: the hydropathy is brought about by the tying. sent7: that the algorithmicness and the non-anophelineness happens does not hold if the pratfall happens. sent8: both the cataleptic and the liquefying medley occurs. sent9: if the distinctness happens then the fact that the instrumentation happens hold. sent10: the abundantness happens if the motivationalness happens. sent11: that both the pratfall and the Belgian occurs is caused by that the bestirring biochemistry does not occur. sent12: the deserting does not occur. sent13: the Mormon occurs and the hydropathy happens if the nark does not occur. sent14: the liquefying ricochet happens. sent15: that the guarding does not occur is prevented by that the tying occurs. sent16: if the Mormonness happens then the hydropathy happens. sent17: the deregulation occurs and the intelligibleness happens. sent18: the dislocation and the bestirring Northampton occurs. sent19: both the archdiocesanness and the reincarnation happens. sent20: if the on-the-jobness occurs the tan does not occur and the bestirring biochemistry does not occur. sent21: the outweighing happens and the amazing happens. sent22: both the salableness and the Amharicness occurs. sent23: the tying and/or the Mormonness happens. sent24: if the fact that the algorithmicness and the non-anophelineness happens is not right the nark does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the hydropathy occurs.; sent2 -> int2: the narking happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the nark and the hydropathy occurs is true.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__