the debarment does not occur.
sent1: the deadness does not occur. sent2: if that the non-wholesomeness and/or the clapping flounder happens is not true the indurating militant does not occur. sent3: if that the indurating burin happens is false then the fact that the wholesomeness does not occur and/or the clapping flounder happens is not right. sent4: that the debarment but not the clapping Yale happens is caused by that the indurating militant does not occur. sent5: both the debarment and the wholesomeness occurs if the clapping flounder does not occur. sent6: the clapping Yale happens and the indurating militant happens. sent7: if the fact that the clapping doctrine does not occur but the outingness happens is incorrect the outingness does not occur. sent8: the open occurs and the regrouping happens. sent9: that the wholesomeness does not occur and the indurating militant does not occur is caused by that the clapping flounder does not occur. sent10: if the outing does not occur then not the misdeal but the touting microbe happens. sent11: the operationalistness does not occur and the clapping Yale does not occur if the indurating militant does not occur. sent12: that the clapping flounder but not the indurating burin happens does not hold if the misdeal does not occur. sent13: both the clapping flounder and the wholesomeness occurs. sent14: if the fact that the changing does not occur is not incorrect that not the clapping doctrine but the outingness occurs is not true. sent15: the clapping flounder occurs. sent16: that the touting microbe does not occur results in that not the indurating burin but the misdeal happens. sent17: that the operationalistness occurs and the touting microbe does not occur is caused by the non-outingness. sent18: that both the spurting Romanal and the touting rhyme occurs results in that the touting plumbing does not occur. sent19: the debarment does not occur if the indurating militant happens and the wholesomeness occurs. sent20: the redaction occurs.
sent6 -> int1: the indurating militant occurs.; sent13 -> int2: the wholesomeness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the indurating militant and the wholesomeness happens.; int3 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the operationalistness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the debarment does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the deadness does not occur. sent2: if that the non-wholesomeness and/or the clapping flounder happens is not true the indurating militant does not occur. sent3: if that the indurating burin happens is false then the fact that the wholesomeness does not occur and/or the clapping flounder happens is not right. sent4: that the debarment but not the clapping Yale happens is caused by that the indurating militant does not occur. sent5: both the debarment and the wholesomeness occurs if the clapping flounder does not occur. sent6: the clapping Yale happens and the indurating militant happens. sent7: if the fact that the clapping doctrine does not occur but the outingness happens is incorrect the outingness does not occur. sent8: the open occurs and the regrouping happens. sent9: that the wholesomeness does not occur and the indurating militant does not occur is caused by that the clapping flounder does not occur. sent10: if the outing does not occur then not the misdeal but the touting microbe happens. sent11: the operationalistness does not occur and the clapping Yale does not occur if the indurating militant does not occur. sent12: that the clapping flounder but not the indurating burin happens does not hold if the misdeal does not occur. sent13: both the clapping flounder and the wholesomeness occurs. sent14: if the fact that the changing does not occur is not incorrect that not the clapping doctrine but the outingness occurs is not true. sent15: the clapping flounder occurs. sent16: that the touting microbe does not occur results in that not the indurating burin but the misdeal happens. sent17: that the operationalistness occurs and the touting microbe does not occur is caused by the non-outingness. sent18: that both the spurting Romanal and the touting rhyme occurs results in that the touting plumbing does not occur. sent19: the debarment does not occur if the indurating militant happens and the wholesomeness occurs. sent20: the redaction occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the indurating militant occurs.; sent13 -> int2: the wholesomeness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the indurating militant and the wholesomeness happens.; int3 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__