the fact that either the Mesa does not cox or it does not blackmail whispered or both is wrong.
sent1: if something does blackmail consecration it blackmails whispered. sent2: there exists something such that it does blackmail whispered and coxes. sent3: if the ocher is a kind of a commodity the pleurocarp is a kind of a commodity. sent4: something that is incestuous is not non-diocesan. sent5: the fact that the pleurocarp is not acaudate and/or it is not incestuous is wrong if the ocher is incestuous. sent6: the pardoner is not a diocesan if the pleurocarp does not bethink inverter. sent7: if the fact that the pleurocarp is a kind of incestuous thing that is diocesan does not hold then it is not incestuous. sent8: something either does not cox or does not blackmail whispered or both if it is not incestuous. sent9: if the pardoner is not non-diocesan that the ocher does not bethink inverter and is not incestuous is false. sent10: the pardoner is not a kind of a diocesan but it is a shoot if the ocher is not a shoot. sent11: the omnivore is incestuous. sent12: something is not a diocesan if the fact that it is both a diocesan and a shoot does not hold. sent13: something is a kind of a diocesan and does blackmail consecration if it is not incurious. sent14: the ocher is not acaudate and it is not a commodity. sent15: the ocher is not acaudate. sent16: that that the Mesa either does not cox or does not blackmail whispered or both is not wrong is wrong if the scholar blackmail whispered. sent17: the pardoner is diocesan if the pleurocarp does not bethink inverter. sent18: if the pleurocarp is not incestuous the pardoner is not a kind of a diocesan. sent19: if that the pleurocarp is not incestuous or it does not bethink inverter or both is not correct the scholar does blackmail consecration. sent20: that either the pleurocarp is not isothermic or it is not a commodity or both does not hold if something is incestuous. sent21: something bethinks inverter if it does blackmail consecration. sent22: the ocher is not incurious but it is not non-diocesan if the pardoner is not a kind of a non-diocesan. sent23: if the scholar does blackmail whispered the fact that either the ocher is not incurious or it does not blackmail whispered or both is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pleurocarp is not incestuous and/or does not bethink inverter.; assump1 & sent18 & sent6 -> int1: the pardoner is not a diocesan.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: that the ocher is not incurious and not non-diocesan is right.; int2 -> int3: the ocher is diocesan.; sent12 -> int4: the ocher is not diocesan if that it is diocesan and it is a shoot is not correct.; sent14 -> int5: the fact that the ocher is not a kind of a commodity is not false.; sent1 -> int6: the scholar does blackmail whispered if it does blackmail consecration.;
the fact that the pleurocarp is not isothermic or is not a kind of a commodity or both is incorrect.
sent13 -> int7: if the fact that the pardoner is not incurious is not false then it is a diocesan and it does blackmail consecration.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the Mesa does not cox or it does not blackmail whispered or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does blackmail consecration it blackmails whispered. sent2: there exists something such that it does blackmail whispered and coxes. sent3: if the ocher is a kind of a commodity the pleurocarp is a kind of a commodity. sent4: something that is incestuous is not non-diocesan. sent5: the fact that the pleurocarp is not acaudate and/or it is not incestuous is wrong if the ocher is incestuous. sent6: the pardoner is not a diocesan if the pleurocarp does not bethink inverter. sent7: if the fact that the pleurocarp is a kind of incestuous thing that is diocesan does not hold then it is not incestuous. sent8: something either does not cox or does not blackmail whispered or both if it is not incestuous. sent9: if the pardoner is not non-diocesan that the ocher does not bethink inverter and is not incestuous is false. sent10: the pardoner is not a kind of a diocesan but it is a shoot if the ocher is not a shoot. sent11: the omnivore is incestuous. sent12: something is not a diocesan if the fact that it is both a diocesan and a shoot does not hold. sent13: something is a kind of a diocesan and does blackmail consecration if it is not incurious. sent14: the ocher is not acaudate and it is not a commodity. sent15: the ocher is not acaudate. sent16: that that the Mesa either does not cox or does not blackmail whispered or both is not wrong is wrong if the scholar blackmail whispered. sent17: the pardoner is diocesan if the pleurocarp does not bethink inverter. sent18: if the pleurocarp is not incestuous the pardoner is not a kind of a diocesan. sent19: if that the pleurocarp is not incestuous or it does not bethink inverter or both is not correct the scholar does blackmail consecration. sent20: that either the pleurocarp is not isothermic or it is not a commodity or both does not hold if something is incestuous. sent21: something bethinks inverter if it does blackmail consecration. sent22: the ocher is not incurious but it is not non-diocesan if the pardoner is not a kind of a non-diocesan. sent23: if the scholar does blackmail whispered the fact that either the ocher is not incurious or it does not blackmail whispered or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pleurocarp is not incestuous and/or does not bethink inverter.; assump1 & sent18 & sent6 -> int1: the pardoner is not a diocesan.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: that the ocher is not incurious and not non-diocesan is right.; int2 -> int3: the ocher is diocesan.; sent12 -> int4: the ocher is not diocesan if that it is diocesan and it is a shoot is not correct.; sent14 -> int5: the fact that the ocher is not a kind of a commodity is not false.; sent1 -> int6: the scholar does blackmail whispered if it does blackmail consecration.; __UNKNOWN__