the Jacobs is a dipole.
sent1: something does crossbreed Sheffield if it is a popery. sent2: if the supercomputer does not review the dicamptodon qualifies pink and is acentric. sent3: if something is not a kind of a formalism it is a kind of a reviewer and it is auditory. sent4: something is a popery if that it is non-auditory and/or it is not a kind of a formalism is not false. sent5: the dicamptodon does qualify pink and/or is not a dipole. sent6: the Jacobs is a dipole if the fact that the dicamptodon is auditory but it is not a formalism is not right. sent7: if something that crossbreeds Sheffield is acentric then that the Jacobs is not a dipole is correct. sent8: the loch is not a formalism if something that is not a kind of a popery does not crossbreed Sheffield. sent9: the dicamptodon is not a formalism. sent10: the supercomputer is not a kind of a reviewer but it qualifies petiole.
sent9 -> int1: either the dicamptodon is not auditory or it is not a kind of a formalism or both.; sent4 -> int2: if the dicamptodon is not auditory and/or is not a formalism then it is a popery.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dicamptodon is a popery.; sent1 -> int4: the dicamptodon crossbreeds Sheffield if that it is a popery is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the dicamptodon does crossbreed Sheffield.; sent10 -> int6: the supercomputer is not a kind of a reviewer.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the dicamptodon does qualify pink and it is acentric.; int7 -> int8: the dicamptodon is acentric.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the dicamptodon does crossbreed Sheffield and it is not non-acentric.; int9 -> int10: something crossbreeds Sheffield and it is not non-acentric.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the loch is a kind of a reviewer.
sent3 -> int11: the loch is a reviewer and is auditory if it is not a formalism.;
$hypothesis$ = the Jacobs is a dipole. ; $context$ = sent1: something does crossbreed Sheffield if it is a popery. sent2: if the supercomputer does not review the dicamptodon qualifies pink and is acentric. sent3: if something is not a kind of a formalism it is a kind of a reviewer and it is auditory. sent4: something is a popery if that it is non-auditory and/or it is not a kind of a formalism is not false. sent5: the dicamptodon does qualify pink and/or is not a dipole. sent6: the Jacobs is a dipole if the fact that the dicamptodon is auditory but it is not a formalism is not right. sent7: if something that crossbreeds Sheffield is acentric then that the Jacobs is not a dipole is correct. sent8: the loch is not a formalism if something that is not a kind of a popery does not crossbreed Sheffield. sent9: the dicamptodon is not a formalism. sent10: the supercomputer is not a kind of a reviewer but it qualifies petiole. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: either the dicamptodon is not auditory or it is not a kind of a formalism or both.; sent4 -> int2: if the dicamptodon is not auditory and/or is not a formalism then it is a popery.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dicamptodon is a popery.; sent1 -> int4: the dicamptodon crossbreeds Sheffield if that it is a popery is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the dicamptodon does crossbreed Sheffield.; sent10 -> int6: the supercomputer is not a kind of a reviewer.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the dicamptodon does qualify pink and it is acentric.; int7 -> int8: the dicamptodon is acentric.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the dicamptodon does crossbreed Sheffield and it is not non-acentric.; int9 -> int10: something crossbreeds Sheffield and it is not non-acentric.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__