there exists something such that that it is not unambitious and/or it is not exact does not hold.
sent1: the fact that if that the dongle is not clinical and does not build misanthropy is false then the dongle is not a straightness is true. sent2: if the Dipper is exact and not a straightness the firewater is not unambitious. sent3: the dongle is exact. sent4: there is something such that that it is not unambitious or exact or both is not right. sent5: if something does repudiate the fact that it does citify megillah and it is not a kind of a arpeggio is not correct. sent6: that the skyscraper is not a straightness and/or it is not a kind of a mnemonic is false. sent7: the Dipper does citify megillah if the levallorphan does citify megillah. sent8: that the dongle is non-clinical thing that does not build misanthropy is incorrect. sent9: if something citifies megillah it is both exact and not a straightness. sent10: the Miwok is exact. sent11: that the dongle is both not clinical and cherty does not hold. sent12: if something is not exact the fact that that it either is not unambitious or does not build misanthropy or both is right is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the dongle is not accessible and/or it does not purify does not hold if the firewater is not unambitious. sent14: the dongle is a fugitive. sent15: if something is not a kind of a straightness that it is not unambitious and/or it is not exact is not correct.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the dongle is not a kind of a straightness.; sent15 -> int2: that the dongle is not unambitious and/or is not exact is not right if it is not a kind of a straightness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the dongle is not unambitious or it is not exact or both is not correct.; int3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that the fact that either it is not accessible or it does not purify or both is incorrect.
sent9 -> int4: the Dipper is exact but it is not a kind of a straightness if it does citify megillah.; sent5 -> int5: the fact that the acerola citifies megillah and is not a kind of a arpeggio does not hold if it does repudiate.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it is not unambitious and/or it is not exact does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if that the dongle is not clinical and does not build misanthropy is false then the dongle is not a straightness is true. sent2: if the Dipper is exact and not a straightness the firewater is not unambitious. sent3: the dongle is exact. sent4: there is something such that that it is not unambitious or exact or both is not right. sent5: if something does repudiate the fact that it does citify megillah and it is not a kind of a arpeggio is not correct. sent6: that the skyscraper is not a straightness and/or it is not a kind of a mnemonic is false. sent7: the Dipper does citify megillah if the levallorphan does citify megillah. sent8: that the dongle is non-clinical thing that does not build misanthropy is incorrect. sent9: if something citifies megillah it is both exact and not a straightness. sent10: the Miwok is exact. sent11: that the dongle is both not clinical and cherty does not hold. sent12: if something is not exact the fact that that it either is not unambitious or does not build misanthropy or both is right is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the dongle is not accessible and/or it does not purify does not hold if the firewater is not unambitious. sent14: the dongle is a fugitive. sent15: if something is not a kind of a straightness that it is not unambitious and/or it is not exact is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the dongle is not a kind of a straightness.; sent15 -> int2: that the dongle is not unambitious and/or is not exact is not right if it is not a kind of a straightness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the dongle is not unambitious or it is not exact or both is not correct.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__