the fact that the flashover does bear radicle and superscribes coax is not wrong.
sent1: if the harasser is not noncausative it is a snub. sent2: if the extern does not imply perfection the roller-skater superscribes coax but it is not a Phasmidae. sent3: a consumptive and non-hypotensive thing implies Palmer. sent4: the mycophagy is a Halloween if it is a Phasmidae but not a chloroprene. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a gun the flashover is not non-consumptive and is not hypotensive. sent6: the winery does not imply Palmer if something that superscribes coax is not a kind of a Phasmidae. sent7: the flashover bears roller-skater if it is not bacterial. sent8: the flashover is a don. sent9: if something does not imply Palmer then the fact that it is a kind of a hypotensive and it is not a kind of a consumptive is false. sent10: if the fact that the flashover does imply Palmer hold it does bear radicle. sent11: there exists something such that it is both not unstable and achromatic. sent12: there exists something such that it does not gun. sent13: if there is something such that it does not tauten polybutylene then the flashover is not non-hypotensive but it is not impotent. sent14: something superscribes coax if it is not a Phasmidae. sent15: if the fact that the flashover either does not bear radicle or is not a gun or both does not hold the OS bear radicle. sent16: the diesel is a lunette if it is exoergic and it does not bear radicle. sent17: the flashover is not non-staphylococcal. sent18: the fact that the tole is a kind of a Phasmidae is not incorrect. sent19: the extern does not imply perfection if something that is not unstable is achromatic. sent20: if something does bear radicle and is not a kind of a consumptive it is a Phasmidae. sent21: if something is not Bayesian the flashover is a Phasmidae. sent22: the Butte is a Phasmidae and is not a kind of a Lubbock.
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the flashover is consumptive but it is not a kind of a hypotensive.; sent3 -> int2: if the flashover is a kind of a consumptive and is not hypotensive it implies Palmer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flashover does imply Palmer.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the flashover bears radicle.; sent14 -> int5: the flashover does superscribe coax if it is not a Phasmidae.;
the OS does bear radicle.
sent9 -> int6: the fact that the winery is a hypotensive and not a consumptive is incorrect if it does not imply Palmer.; sent11 & sent19 -> int7: the extern does not imply perfection.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the roller-skater superscribes coax but it is not a kind of a Phasmidae.; int8 -> int9: something superscribes coax but it is not a Phasmidae.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the winery does not imply Palmer.; int6 & int10 -> int11: that the winery is a kind of a hypotensive but it is not consumptive does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is a kind of a hypotensive and it is not a consumptive is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the flashover does bear radicle and superscribes coax is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the harasser is not noncausative it is a snub. sent2: if the extern does not imply perfection the roller-skater superscribes coax but it is not a Phasmidae. sent3: a consumptive and non-hypotensive thing implies Palmer. sent4: the mycophagy is a Halloween if it is a Phasmidae but not a chloroprene. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a gun the flashover is not non-consumptive and is not hypotensive. sent6: the winery does not imply Palmer if something that superscribes coax is not a kind of a Phasmidae. sent7: the flashover bears roller-skater if it is not bacterial. sent8: the flashover is a don. sent9: if something does not imply Palmer then the fact that it is a kind of a hypotensive and it is not a kind of a consumptive is false. sent10: if the fact that the flashover does imply Palmer hold it does bear radicle. sent11: there exists something such that it is both not unstable and achromatic. sent12: there exists something such that it does not gun. sent13: if there is something such that it does not tauten polybutylene then the flashover is not non-hypotensive but it is not impotent. sent14: something superscribes coax if it is not a Phasmidae. sent15: if the fact that the flashover either does not bear radicle or is not a gun or both does not hold the OS bear radicle. sent16: the diesel is a lunette if it is exoergic and it does not bear radicle. sent17: the flashover is not non-staphylococcal. sent18: the fact that the tole is a kind of a Phasmidae is not incorrect. sent19: the extern does not imply perfection if something that is not unstable is achromatic. sent20: if something does bear radicle and is not a kind of a consumptive it is a Phasmidae. sent21: if something is not Bayesian the flashover is a Phasmidae. sent22: the Butte is a Phasmidae and is not a kind of a Lubbock. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the flashover is consumptive but it is not a kind of a hypotensive.; sent3 -> int2: if the flashover is a kind of a consumptive and is not hypotensive it implies Palmer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flashover does imply Palmer.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the flashover bears radicle.; sent14 -> int5: the flashover does superscribe coax if it is not a Phasmidae.; __UNKNOWN__