there is something such that if it is not realistic that it is a counterpoint and it does not superscribe crested is correct.
sent1: the isolationist is not a gook if it tautens trillion. sent2: something is a professionalism if it is realistic. sent3: the isolationist is not a kind of a Emberizidae. sent4: if that the isolationist is not a phlebotomist and is not non-guilty is not right then it is not syphilitic. sent5: if the isolationist is unrealistic then the fact that it is not a phlebotomist and it is guilty is false. sent6: that the isolationist is a phlebotomist and it is guilty is false. sent7: if that the isolationist does not imply wishbone and is realistic is false then that it is not agrypnotic is not wrong. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a phlebotomist then it is realistic. sent9: the isolationist accumulates and is not skinless if it is not a Skinner. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is not syphilitic is not wrong it superscribes crested and is not guilty. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a syphilitic then it superscribes crested and it is not a kind of a counterpoint. sent12: that the isolationist sophisticates and it does domesticate is false if it is not apteral. sent13: that the isolationist is a kind of a megalomaniac that does domesticate is incorrect if it is not guilty. sent14: the fact that the isolationist superscribes equipment does not hold. sent15: the periodontist does counterpoint and is not a kind of a Golgi if it does not superscribe Kirkia. sent16: the fact that the isolationist is not a phlebotomist but it is guilty does not hold if the fact that it is realistic is not incorrect. sent17: there is something such that if it is not realistic it does not superscribe crested. sent18: if the corporatist is not syphilitic it is a kind of a alkyl that is not diffused. sent19: if the isolationist is not syphilitic it is a counterpoint and does not superscribe crested. sent20: the isolationist is not a saurian if it is not many. sent21: there exists something such that if it does not superscribe crested the fact that it is a syphilitic is not wrong. sent22: the isolationist does not superscribe crested. sent23: there is something such that if that it is not guilty is right it does counterpoint and it is a syphilitic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the isolationist is not realistic.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the isolationist is not a phlebotomist and is guilty is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the isolationist is not a syphilitic.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the isolationist is a counterpoint but it does not superscribe crested.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the isolationist is not realistic then it is a counterpoint and it does not superscribe crested.; int4 -> hypothesis;
that that the academy is not a professionalism but it is a alkyl is false is not false.
sent2 -> int5: if the isolationist is realistic then it is a professionalism.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not realistic that it is a counterpoint and it does not superscribe crested is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the isolationist is not a gook if it tautens trillion. sent2: something is a professionalism if it is realistic. sent3: the isolationist is not a kind of a Emberizidae. sent4: if that the isolationist is not a phlebotomist and is not non-guilty is not right then it is not syphilitic. sent5: if the isolationist is unrealistic then the fact that it is not a phlebotomist and it is guilty is false. sent6: that the isolationist is a phlebotomist and it is guilty is false. sent7: if that the isolationist does not imply wishbone and is realistic is false then that it is not agrypnotic is not wrong. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a phlebotomist then it is realistic. sent9: the isolationist accumulates and is not skinless if it is not a Skinner. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is not syphilitic is not wrong it superscribes crested and is not guilty. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a syphilitic then it superscribes crested and it is not a kind of a counterpoint. sent12: that the isolationist sophisticates and it does domesticate is false if it is not apteral. sent13: that the isolationist is a kind of a megalomaniac that does domesticate is incorrect if it is not guilty. sent14: the fact that the isolationist superscribes equipment does not hold. sent15: the periodontist does counterpoint and is not a kind of a Golgi if it does not superscribe Kirkia. sent16: the fact that the isolationist is not a phlebotomist but it is guilty does not hold if the fact that it is realistic is not incorrect. sent17: there is something such that if it is not realistic it does not superscribe crested. sent18: if the corporatist is not syphilitic it is a kind of a alkyl that is not diffused. sent19: if the isolationist is not syphilitic it is a counterpoint and does not superscribe crested. sent20: the isolationist is not a saurian if it is not many. sent21: there exists something such that if it does not superscribe crested the fact that it is a syphilitic is not wrong. sent22: the isolationist does not superscribe crested. sent23: there is something such that if that it is not guilty is right it does counterpoint and it is a syphilitic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the isolationist is not realistic.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the isolationist is not a phlebotomist and is guilty is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the isolationist is not a syphilitic.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the isolationist is a counterpoint but it does not superscribe crested.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the isolationist is not realistic then it is a counterpoint and it does not superscribe crested.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__