the fact that the mesicness does not occur and/or the Caliphate happens if the predating brethren happens does not hold.
sent1: if the squinching capiz does not occur that the fact that the non-feudalness and/or the counterblow occurs is not incorrect is wrong. sent2: the fact that that not the squinching suitability but the predating Cimex occurs is caused by that the judicialness occurs is not wrong. sent3: if the floweriness does not occur the objection and the junketing happens. sent4: if the surfeit does not occur then both the exemptness and the zoolatry happens. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the surfeiting and the non-feminineness occurs is not wrong does not hold then the surfeiting does not occur. sent6: if that the triangulating happens but the squinching denotatum does not occur does not hold then the expiratoriness does not occur. sent7: the mesicness happens. sent8: the predating brethren happens if the fact that either the non-mesicness or the Caliphate or both occurs is not correct. sent9: the ionicness occurs. sent10: the divergence happens if that the squinching capiz occurs is not wrong. sent11: that both the predating brethren and the squinching capiz happens is caused by that the expiratoriness does not occur. sent12: if the blackmailing rainbow happens then that the triangulateness but not the squinching denotatum occurs is not right. sent13: if the exempting happens both the southwester and the non-floweryness occurs. sent14: the predating brethren does not occur if the fact that the mesicness does not occur or the Caliphate happens or both is not correct. sent15: the fact that both the surfeit and the non-feminineness occurs is not right if the squinching suitability does not occur. sent16: if the objection occurs the blackmailing rainbow happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the non-mesicness or the Caliphate or both occurs is wrong.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the predating brethren does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the predating brethren happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the non-mesicness or the Caliphate or both happens.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the divergence happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mesicness does not occur and/or the Caliphate happens if the predating brethren happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the squinching capiz does not occur that the fact that the non-feudalness and/or the counterblow occurs is not incorrect is wrong. sent2: the fact that that not the squinching suitability but the predating Cimex occurs is caused by that the judicialness occurs is not wrong. sent3: if the floweriness does not occur the objection and the junketing happens. sent4: if the surfeit does not occur then both the exemptness and the zoolatry happens. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the surfeiting and the non-feminineness occurs is not wrong does not hold then the surfeiting does not occur. sent6: if that the triangulating happens but the squinching denotatum does not occur does not hold then the expiratoriness does not occur. sent7: the mesicness happens. sent8: the predating brethren happens if the fact that either the non-mesicness or the Caliphate or both occurs is not correct. sent9: the ionicness occurs. sent10: the divergence happens if that the squinching capiz occurs is not wrong. sent11: that both the predating brethren and the squinching capiz happens is caused by that the expiratoriness does not occur. sent12: if the blackmailing rainbow happens then that the triangulateness but not the squinching denotatum occurs is not right. sent13: if the exempting happens both the southwester and the non-floweryness occurs. sent14: the predating brethren does not occur if the fact that the mesicness does not occur or the Caliphate happens or both is not correct. sent15: the fact that both the surfeit and the non-feminineness occurs is not right if the squinching suitability does not occur. sent16: if the objection occurs the blackmailing rainbow happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the non-mesicness or the Caliphate or both occurs is wrong.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the predating brethren does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the predating brethren happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the non-mesicness or the Caliphate or both happens.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__