the fact that the avenger embarks or it is not a haggle or both does not hold.
sent1: something is not a biochip if it does not summarize mombin. sent2: that the madderwort is not carnivorous and it does not offset wax-chandler does not hold if there is something such that it does not detick chalazion. sent3: if something does offset wax-chandler it does not summarize withstander. sent4: something summarizes mombin if it is a furan. sent5: the fact that the hindlimb is not a biochip and/or is not a kind of a furan is not correct if the florist is not carnivorous. sent6: if the Cajun is a kind of a debit and does not summarize withstander it does not detick chalazion. sent7: if the Cajun does not detick chalazion then that the doe is not a furan and does not detick chalazion is not correct. sent8: the Cajun is carnivorous and it does offset wax-chandler. sent9: something that does offset wax-chandler is a debit that does not summarize withstander. sent10: if that the doe deticks chalazion but it does not offset wax-chandler is incorrect then the avenger offset wax-chandler. sent11: the fact that something embarks and/or is not a haggle is wrong if that it offsets wax-chandler is correct. sent12: the bluestone is not carnivorous. sent13: something is carnivorous if the fact that it is not carnivorous and does not offset wax-chandler is false. sent14: the Cajun does not detick chalazion if it is a debit that does summarize withstander. sent15: something does embark if it is not a biochip. sent16: if that something is not a kind of a biochip and/or it is not a furan does not hold then it does not summarize mombin. sent17: if the fact that the doe is not a furan and it does not detick chalazion does not hold the avenger does not summarize mombin.
sent9 -> int1: if the Cajun offsets wax-chandler then it does debit and does not summarize withstander.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the Cajun does offset wax-chandler is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Cajun is a debit and does not summarize withstander.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the Cajun does not detick chalazion.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: that the doe is not a furan and it does not detick chalazion is not right.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the avenger does not summarize mombin.; sent1 -> int7: if the avenger does not summarize mombin then it is not a biochip.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the avenger is not a biochip.; sent15 -> int9: the avenger does embark if it is not a biochip.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the avenger does embark.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the avenger does embark and/or it does not haggle is wrong.
sent11 -> int11: if the avenger offsets wax-chandler that it does embark or it does not haggle or both is not right.; sent16 -> int12: the fact that the hindlimb does not summarize mombin if that that the hindlimb is not a biochip and/or it is not a kind of a furan is incorrect is not false is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the avenger embarks or it is not a haggle or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a biochip if it does not summarize mombin. sent2: that the madderwort is not carnivorous and it does not offset wax-chandler does not hold if there is something such that it does not detick chalazion. sent3: if something does offset wax-chandler it does not summarize withstander. sent4: something summarizes mombin if it is a furan. sent5: the fact that the hindlimb is not a biochip and/or is not a kind of a furan is not correct if the florist is not carnivorous. sent6: if the Cajun is a kind of a debit and does not summarize withstander it does not detick chalazion. sent7: if the Cajun does not detick chalazion then that the doe is not a furan and does not detick chalazion is not correct. sent8: the Cajun is carnivorous and it does offset wax-chandler. sent9: something that does offset wax-chandler is a debit that does not summarize withstander. sent10: if that the doe deticks chalazion but it does not offset wax-chandler is incorrect then the avenger offset wax-chandler. sent11: the fact that something embarks and/or is not a haggle is wrong if that it offsets wax-chandler is correct. sent12: the bluestone is not carnivorous. sent13: something is carnivorous if the fact that it is not carnivorous and does not offset wax-chandler is false. sent14: the Cajun does not detick chalazion if it is a debit that does summarize withstander. sent15: something does embark if it is not a biochip. sent16: if that something is not a kind of a biochip and/or it is not a furan does not hold then it does not summarize mombin. sent17: if the fact that the doe is not a furan and it does not detick chalazion does not hold the avenger does not summarize mombin. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the Cajun offsets wax-chandler then it does debit and does not summarize withstander.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the Cajun does offset wax-chandler is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Cajun is a debit and does not summarize withstander.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the Cajun does not detick chalazion.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: that the doe is not a furan and it does not detick chalazion is not right.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the avenger does not summarize mombin.; sent1 -> int7: if the avenger does not summarize mombin then it is not a biochip.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the avenger is not a biochip.; sent15 -> int9: the avenger does embark if it is not a biochip.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the avenger does embark.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__