the meniscus is reconcilable and it is reptilian.
sent1: the meniscus is not a genome and is not thermoelectric. sent2: the interference is thermoelectric thing that compromises Wilton. sent3: if something is not icterogenic and it is not a kind of a Hubel then it is a kind of a pull. sent4: there are reconcilable things. sent5: that there is something such that it compromises Wilton and it is reconcilable is not false. sent6: the interference compromises interference if it compromises Wilton and it does not prepare Nantucket. sent7: there is something such that it dabs implant. sent8: something is a kind of a content. sent9: the interference is a Chilopoda and compromises Wilton. sent10: if a dissuasive thing is not cesarean then it is a corsair. sent11: the meniscus does not compromise Wilton and is not thermoelectric. sent12: the meniscus is non-inflectional thing that does not obtrude. sent13: if something is irreconcilable thing that is not a conciliation then it is reptilian. sent14: if something is not a kind of a emotionality but it prepares encainide it is a lutetium. sent15: something that is not a kind of a genome and is not thermoelectric is not reptilian. sent16: the interference is reconcilable if it is not thermoelectric and it does compromise Wilton. sent17: if a non-reconcilable thing is a genome it is a conciliation. sent18: the interference compromises Wilton and it is a conciliation. sent19: the meniscus is thermoelectric if that it is not a genome and it is a kind of a conciliation is true.
sent18 -> int1: there exists something such that it does compromise Wilton and is a conciliation.; sent15 -> int2: the meniscus is reptilian if it is not a genome and not thermoelectric.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the meniscus is reptilian.;
$hypothesis$ = the meniscus is reconcilable and it is reptilian. ; $context$ = sent1: the meniscus is not a genome and is not thermoelectric. sent2: the interference is thermoelectric thing that compromises Wilton. sent3: if something is not icterogenic and it is not a kind of a Hubel then it is a kind of a pull. sent4: there are reconcilable things. sent5: that there is something such that it compromises Wilton and it is reconcilable is not false. sent6: the interference compromises interference if it compromises Wilton and it does not prepare Nantucket. sent7: there is something such that it dabs implant. sent8: something is a kind of a content. sent9: the interference is a Chilopoda and compromises Wilton. sent10: if a dissuasive thing is not cesarean then it is a corsair. sent11: the meniscus does not compromise Wilton and is not thermoelectric. sent12: the meniscus is non-inflectional thing that does not obtrude. sent13: if something is irreconcilable thing that is not a conciliation then it is reptilian. sent14: if something is not a kind of a emotionality but it prepares encainide it is a lutetium. sent15: something that is not a kind of a genome and is not thermoelectric is not reptilian. sent16: the interference is reconcilable if it is not thermoelectric and it does compromise Wilton. sent17: if a non-reconcilable thing is a genome it is a conciliation. sent18: the interference compromises Wilton and it is a conciliation. sent19: the meniscus is thermoelectric if that it is not a genome and it is a kind of a conciliation is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: there exists something such that it does compromise Wilton and is a conciliation.; sent15 -> int2: the meniscus is reptilian if it is not a genome and not thermoelectric.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the meniscus is reptilian.; __UNKNOWN__