the dealer is not a kind of a mid-off.
sent1: the fact that something is life-support thing that is not a kind of a temporal is not right if it is thoughtful. sent2: the walrus approximates. sent3: the Fauve does not philander acetaldehyde. sent4: the walrus does catapult Ningirsu. sent5: the walrus does catapult Ningirsu and it is a John. sent6: the walrus is a kind of a mid-off. sent7: the fact that something is a mid-off and does not approximate is not right if it is not a Calvinism. sent8: the dealer does philander acetaldehyde. sent9: if that something is life-support and is not a kind of a temporal is not true it is not a Calvinism. sent10: The acetaldehyde does philander walrus. sent11: the walrus does philander acetaldehyde. sent12: that the walrus is not a mid-off is right if the dealer philanders acetaldehyde and it approximates. sent13: if the dealer is a mid-off and it does approximate the walrus does not philander acetaldehyde. sent14: the dealer does not approximate if the walrus does philander acetaldehyde and is a mid-off.
sent2 & sent11 -> int1: the walrus does approximate and it does philander acetaldehyde.;
the fact that the patroness philanders acetaldehyde hold.
sent7 -> int2: if the walrus is not a kind of a Calvinism that it is a mid-off and it does not approximate is false.; sent9 -> int3: the fact that the walrus is not a Calvinism is correct if that that it is both life-support and not a temporal hold is not right.; sent1 -> int4: that the walrus is not non-life-support but it is non-temporal is not correct if it is thoughtful.;
$hypothesis$ = the dealer is not a kind of a mid-off. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is life-support thing that is not a kind of a temporal is not right if it is thoughtful. sent2: the walrus approximates. sent3: the Fauve does not philander acetaldehyde. sent4: the walrus does catapult Ningirsu. sent5: the walrus does catapult Ningirsu and it is a John. sent6: the walrus is a kind of a mid-off. sent7: the fact that something is a mid-off and does not approximate is not right if it is not a Calvinism. sent8: the dealer does philander acetaldehyde. sent9: if that something is life-support and is not a kind of a temporal is not true it is not a Calvinism. sent10: The acetaldehyde does philander walrus. sent11: the walrus does philander acetaldehyde. sent12: that the walrus is not a mid-off is right if the dealer philanders acetaldehyde and it approximates. sent13: if the dealer is a mid-off and it does approximate the walrus does not philander acetaldehyde. sent14: the dealer does not approximate if the walrus does philander acetaldehyde and is a mid-off. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent11 -> int1: the walrus does approximate and it does philander acetaldehyde.; __UNKNOWN__