the calciferol does not move cuspidation.
sent1: if something is not a unpalatability then it moves cuspidation and it is periodontic. sent2: the lambda is a catechumen if it does not aggregate Muhammad and/or is unborn. sent3: if something is not a kind of a catechumen the fact that it does not dissociate forbearance and it is high-interest is wrong. sent4: the lambda does not aggregate Muhammad and/or it is unborn. sent5: something is not a kind of a catechumen if it is not periodontic. sent6: the dump is a catechumen if that the fact that the lambda either is high-interest or does not dissociate forbearance or both hold is not correct. sent7: the lambda does dissociate forbearance if it is high-interest. sent8: the calciferol does not move cuspidation if the lambda is not high-interest. sent9: the lambda is high-interest if the fact that it is a catechumen is true. sent10: the calciferol arranges if it dissociates forbearance. sent11: the fact that something is not non-high-interest or it does not dissociate forbearance or both does not hold if it moves cuspidation. sent12: the Sotho is not a unpalatability. sent13: if that the droshky is not non-periodontic and it is a unpalatability is false then the antiprotozoal is not non-periodontic. sent14: that the droshky is periodontic and it is a unpalatability is false if there is something such that it is not a unpalatability. sent15: the lambda is a catechumen if that it does not aggregate Muhammad is true. sent16: either the lambda is not high-interest or it does not move cuspidation or both if there exists something such that it is not high-interest. sent17: the lambda either aggregates Muhammad or is unborn or both. sent18: if the lambda does dissociate forbearance then the calciferol moves cuspidation. sent19: the Maldivian is not unborn and/or it moves Annona.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the lambda is a catechumen.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the lambda is high-interest is not incorrect.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the lambda does dissociate forbearance.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the calciferol does not move cuspidation.
sent3 -> int4: if the antiprotozoal is not a catechumen then that it does not dissociate forbearance and it is not non-high-interest does not hold.; sent5 -> int5: the antiprotozoal is not a catechumen if it is not periodontic.; sent12 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a unpalatability.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the droshky is periodontic and it is a kind of a unpalatability is correct is incorrect.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the antiprotozoal is not periodontic.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the antiprotozoal is not a kind of a catechumen.; int4 & int9 -> int10: that the antiprotozoal does not dissociate forbearance and is high-interest does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the calciferol does not move cuspidation. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a unpalatability then it moves cuspidation and it is periodontic. sent2: the lambda is a catechumen if it does not aggregate Muhammad and/or is unborn. sent3: if something is not a kind of a catechumen the fact that it does not dissociate forbearance and it is high-interest is wrong. sent4: the lambda does not aggregate Muhammad and/or it is unborn. sent5: something is not a kind of a catechumen if it is not periodontic. sent6: the dump is a catechumen if that the fact that the lambda either is high-interest or does not dissociate forbearance or both hold is not correct. sent7: the lambda does dissociate forbearance if it is high-interest. sent8: the calciferol does not move cuspidation if the lambda is not high-interest. sent9: the lambda is high-interest if the fact that it is a catechumen is true. sent10: the calciferol arranges if it dissociates forbearance. sent11: the fact that something is not non-high-interest or it does not dissociate forbearance or both does not hold if it moves cuspidation. sent12: the Sotho is not a unpalatability. sent13: if that the droshky is not non-periodontic and it is a unpalatability is false then the antiprotozoal is not non-periodontic. sent14: that the droshky is periodontic and it is a unpalatability is false if there is something such that it is not a unpalatability. sent15: the lambda is a catechumen if that it does not aggregate Muhammad is true. sent16: either the lambda is not high-interest or it does not move cuspidation or both if there exists something such that it is not high-interest. sent17: the lambda either aggregates Muhammad or is unborn or both. sent18: if the lambda does dissociate forbearance then the calciferol moves cuspidation. sent19: the Maldivian is not unborn and/or it moves Annona. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the lambda is a catechumen.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the lambda is high-interest is not incorrect.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the lambda does dissociate forbearance.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__