if the molehill does not symmetrize and does smite molehill the harness is not amphoric.
sent1: that the harness is not amphoric if the molehill does symmetrize and smites molehill hold. sent2: if the molehill does not symmetrize and does smite molehill the man-child does not whistle snowball. sent3: the fact that the harness is not a chon is not incorrect if the molehill is non-amphoric thing that does not whistle snowball. sent4: the man-child does not whistle snowball if the molehill symmetrizes and does smite molehill. sent5: there exists something such that it is both not a kalansuwa and not a Kazakhstani. sent6: if something is both a kalansuwa and not a Kazakhstani then the man-child is a chon. sent7: the man-child is a chon if something that is not a kalansuwa is Kazakhstani. sent8: there is something such that it is not a silicate. sent9: the fact that the molehill does smite molehill is not incorrect. sent10: the man-child is a kind of a chon if something is not a kalansuwa and is not a Kazakhstani. sent11: if the molehill does not symmetrize and does smite molehill then the harness is amphoric. sent12: the molehill does not whistle snowball if that the man-child symmetrizes and it does smite molehill is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the molehill does not symmetrize but it does smite molehill.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the man-child does not whistle snowball.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: the man-child is a chon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the man-child is a chon but it does not whistle snowball.;
the molehill does not whistle snowball.
$hypothesis$ = if the molehill does not symmetrize and does smite molehill the harness is not amphoric. ; $context$ = sent1: that the harness is not amphoric if the molehill does symmetrize and smites molehill hold. sent2: if the molehill does not symmetrize and does smite molehill the man-child does not whistle snowball. sent3: the fact that the harness is not a chon is not incorrect if the molehill is non-amphoric thing that does not whistle snowball. sent4: the man-child does not whistle snowball if the molehill symmetrizes and does smite molehill. sent5: there exists something such that it is both not a kalansuwa and not a Kazakhstani. sent6: if something is both a kalansuwa and not a Kazakhstani then the man-child is a chon. sent7: the man-child is a chon if something that is not a kalansuwa is Kazakhstani. sent8: there is something such that it is not a silicate. sent9: the fact that the molehill does smite molehill is not incorrect. sent10: the man-child is a kind of a chon if something is not a kalansuwa and is not a Kazakhstani. sent11: if the molehill does not symmetrize and does smite molehill then the harness is amphoric. sent12: the molehill does not whistle snowball if that the man-child symmetrizes and it does smite molehill is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the molehill does not symmetrize but it does smite molehill.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the man-child does not whistle snowball.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: the man-child is a chon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the man-child is a chon but it does not whistle snowball.; __UNKNOWN__