that the tun is a colorimeter and it is a stockpot is not correct.
sent1: that the signaler is not a mass is right. sent2: if something is both not a finisher and not a serologist it is a stockpot. sent3: the tun clanks if it is not a lithography and does not mystify Thorpe. sent4: something clanks if it does not jazz Mergenthaler and is not prudent. sent5: a finisher that is not a serologist is a stockpot. sent6: the tun is not a lithography and does not mystify Thorpe. sent7: the tun is a kind of a colorimeter if the fact that the bunsen is not a composite and is not a ticking does not hold. sent8: something that clanks is not a finisher and not a serologist. sent9: the bunsen is not a Belsen if it is not composite and does not tick. sent10: if something that is not a finisher is a serologist it is a stockpot. sent11: if the satsuma wrests bunsen then the signaler does mass. sent12: if the bunsen is not a kind of a Belsen the fact that the satsuma wrests bunsen is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bunsen is not a composite and it does not tick.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bunsen is not a Belsen is not incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the satsuma does not wrest bunsen is not true.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the signaler is a kind of a mass is true.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the bunsen is not a composite and it is not a ticking is wrong.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the tun is a colorimeter.; sent2 -> int7: the tun is a stockpot if it is not a finisher and it is not a kind of a serologist.; sent8 -> int8: the tun is not a kind of a finisher and it is not a serologist if it does clank.; sent3 & sent6 -> int9: the tun does clank.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the tun is not a finisher and it is not a serologist.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the tun is a stockpot.; int6 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the museum clanks if it does not jazz Mergenthaler and is not prudent.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the tun is a colorimeter and it is a stockpot is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the signaler is not a mass is right. sent2: if something is both not a finisher and not a serologist it is a stockpot. sent3: the tun clanks if it is not a lithography and does not mystify Thorpe. sent4: something clanks if it does not jazz Mergenthaler and is not prudent. sent5: a finisher that is not a serologist is a stockpot. sent6: the tun is not a lithography and does not mystify Thorpe. sent7: the tun is a kind of a colorimeter if the fact that the bunsen is not a composite and is not a ticking does not hold. sent8: something that clanks is not a finisher and not a serologist. sent9: the bunsen is not a Belsen if it is not composite and does not tick. sent10: if something that is not a finisher is a serologist it is a stockpot. sent11: if the satsuma wrests bunsen then the signaler does mass. sent12: if the bunsen is not a kind of a Belsen the fact that the satsuma wrests bunsen is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bunsen is not a composite and it does not tick.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bunsen is not a Belsen is not incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the satsuma does not wrest bunsen is not true.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the signaler is a kind of a mass is true.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the bunsen is not a composite and it is not a ticking is wrong.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the tun is a colorimeter.; sent2 -> int7: the tun is a stockpot if it is not a finisher and it is not a kind of a serologist.; sent8 -> int8: the tun is not a kind of a finisher and it is not a serologist if it does clank.; sent3 & sent6 -> int9: the tun does clank.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the tun is not a finisher and it is not a serologist.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the tun is a stockpot.; int6 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__