the behaviorist is not a kind of a manipulability.
sent1: the coastline urticates missal if there is something such that it does urticates missal. sent2: if the columbite-tantalite is a kind of a Dempsey the coastline urticates missal but it is not a seam. sent3: if that something does riddle taxability but it does not urticate missal does not hold then it is not a Dempsey. sent4: if something is not a Dempsey it is not a kind of a manipulability. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a confession then the coastline urticates Carya. sent6: the behaviorist does cling if there exists something such that that it is both not a Maputo and a PCP is wrong. sent7: if the coastline does urticate missal and does not seam the fact that the behaviorist does seam is not false. sent8: if the columbite-tantalite does gibber the fact that either it does not riddle taxability or it urticates missal or both is not false. sent9: something clings. sent10: something is not a confession. sent11: the fact that the roulade is both not a Maputo and a PCP is false. sent12: the fact that the behaviorist is not a kind of a manipulability and does urticate missal does not hold. sent13: the fact that if something does not riddle taxability or it does urticate missal or both the coastline urticate missal hold. sent14: if the fact that something does not incriminate thwack and is not oncological is not correct then it does not gibber. sent15: the roulade is both a Dempsey and a PCP. sent16: if something does urticate Carya then that it does not incriminate thwack and is not oncological is false. sent17: the coastline is not a kind of a Dempsey. sent18: if a cling is a kind of a Dempsey the coastline does not urticate missal. sent19: the columbite-tantalite gibbers. sent20: if the behaviorist seams and/or is a cling the corpus is not a kind of a seams.
sent11 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a Maputo and is a kind of a PCP is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the behaviorist is a cling.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the behaviorist is a Dempsey.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the behaviorist is a cling that is a Dempsey.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a cling and it is a kind of a Dempsey.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the fact that the coastline does not urticate missal is not wrong.; sent8 & sent19 -> int6: the columbite-tantalite does not riddle taxability and/or it urticates missal.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that either it does not riddle taxability or it urticates missal or both.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the coastline does urticate missal.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the behaviorist is not a Dempsey.; sent4 -> int11: the behaviorist is not a manipulability if it is not a Dempsey.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the behaviorist is a manipulability is not incorrect.
sent3 -> int12: if that the coastline riddles taxability but it does not urticate missal is not correct it is not a Dempsey.; sent14 -> int13: if the fact that that the coastline does not incriminate thwack and is not oncological does not hold is not wrong it does not gibber.; sent16 -> int14: if the coastline urticates Carya then the fact that it does not incriminate thwack and is not oncological is not right.; sent10 & sent5 -> int15: the coastline does urticate Carya.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the coastline does not incriminate thwack and is not oncological is not correct.; int13 & int16 -> int17: the coastline does not gibber.;
$hypothesis$ = the behaviorist is not a kind of a manipulability. ; $context$ = sent1: the coastline urticates missal if there is something such that it does urticates missal. sent2: if the columbite-tantalite is a kind of a Dempsey the coastline urticates missal but it is not a seam. sent3: if that something does riddle taxability but it does not urticate missal does not hold then it is not a Dempsey. sent4: if something is not a Dempsey it is not a kind of a manipulability. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a confession then the coastline urticates Carya. sent6: the behaviorist does cling if there exists something such that that it is both not a Maputo and a PCP is wrong. sent7: if the coastline does urticate missal and does not seam the fact that the behaviorist does seam is not false. sent8: if the columbite-tantalite does gibber the fact that either it does not riddle taxability or it urticates missal or both is not false. sent9: something clings. sent10: something is not a confession. sent11: the fact that the roulade is both not a Maputo and a PCP is false. sent12: the fact that the behaviorist is not a kind of a manipulability and does urticate missal does not hold. sent13: the fact that if something does not riddle taxability or it does urticate missal or both the coastline urticate missal hold. sent14: if the fact that something does not incriminate thwack and is not oncological is not correct then it does not gibber. sent15: the roulade is both a Dempsey and a PCP. sent16: if something does urticate Carya then that it does not incriminate thwack and is not oncological is false. sent17: the coastline is not a kind of a Dempsey. sent18: if a cling is a kind of a Dempsey the coastline does not urticate missal. sent19: the columbite-tantalite gibbers. sent20: if the behaviorist seams and/or is a cling the corpus is not a kind of a seams. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a Maputo and is a kind of a PCP is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the behaviorist is a cling.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the behaviorist is a Dempsey.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the behaviorist is a cling that is a Dempsey.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a cling and it is a kind of a Dempsey.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the fact that the coastline does not urticate missal is not wrong.; sent8 & sent19 -> int6: the columbite-tantalite does not riddle taxability and/or it urticates missal.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that either it does not riddle taxability or it urticates missal or both.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the coastline does urticate missal.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the behaviorist is not a Dempsey.; sent4 -> int11: the behaviorist is not a manipulability if it is not a Dempsey.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__