if that the winery does dogmatize poolroom and is not impermeable is not wrong it does acquaint aid.
sent1: something is Singhalese if it is feminist and not a Thursday. sent2: if something that does dogmatize poolroom is not impermeable it acquaints aid. sent3: if the winery dogmatizes poolroom and it is impermeable then the fact that it acquaints aid is not wrong. sent4: if something is a kind of a Bermudan that is not a kind of a thatch then it bunks miniaturization. sent5: if the winery is both dipolar and not impermeable then it does bunk gust. sent6: the ecrevisse is monatomic if it does dogmatize poolroom and does not dissemble. sent7: if something does dogmatize poolroom and it is impermeable it does acquaint aid. sent8: if the juggernaut is impermeable and does not bunk gust then it does bunk cloistered.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if that the winery does dogmatize poolroom and is not impermeable is not wrong it does acquaint aid. ; $context$ = sent1: something is Singhalese if it is feminist and not a Thursday. sent2: if something that does dogmatize poolroom is not impermeable it acquaints aid. sent3: if the winery dogmatizes poolroom and it is impermeable then the fact that it acquaints aid is not wrong. sent4: if something is a kind of a Bermudan that is not a kind of a thatch then it bunks miniaturization. sent5: if the winery is both dipolar and not impermeable then it does bunk gust. sent6: the ecrevisse is monatomic if it does dogmatize poolroom and does not dissemble. sent7: if something does dogmatize poolroom and it is impermeable it does acquaint aid. sent8: if the juggernaut is impermeable and does not bunk gust then it does bunk cloistered. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__