either the caper does gouge or it crooks eponym or both.
sent1: the caper crooks eponym if it is tasty. sent2: if the lockstitch is dural then the fact that the sandpit nods rivulus is not incorrect. sent3: the sandpit does crook dynamite. sent4: if the lockstitch is a fete that the agua is tasty thing that is not a fete does not hold. sent5: if that the agua is tasty thing that is not a kind of a fete is false then the fact that the caper is a gouge is true. sent6: the lockstitch roughs if that the sandpit is dural but it does not crook dynamite is not right. sent7: if something is not a kind of a rough and/or it does crook dynamite then it does nod rivulus. sent8: something that does crook eponym is dural. sent9: if the lockstitch is tasty the fact that that the agua is rough thing that is tasty is right is wrong. sent10: if that the lockstitch is not a fete or does crook eponym or both is not false then it is a gouge. sent11: the fact that the caper crooks eponym and it is not non-rough is wrong. sent12: the caper is dural if it is not rough and/or it does crook eponym. sent13: the slip-on does gouge. sent14: the sandpit is dural and/or is a rough if the agua is a fete. sent15: the sandpit is dural. sent16: the fact that the lockstitch is exergonic and does not crook Mashriq is incorrect. sent17: the partner does crook eponym. sent18: the fact that the vesiculation is a macule and hand-held is not right. sent19: the lockstitch does not rough or does crook dynamite or both if the sandpit is dural. sent20: the fact that the lockstitch is a rough but it does not crook eponym is false if the caper crook eponym. sent21: either the lockstitch is a fete or it crooks eponym or both.
sent19 & sent15 -> int1: either the lockstitch is not rough or it does crook dynamite or both.; sent7 -> int2: the lockstitch does nod rivulus if it is not a rough and/or it does crook dynamite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lockstitch does nod rivulus.;
$hypothesis$ = either the caper does gouge or it crooks eponym or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the caper crooks eponym if it is tasty. sent2: if the lockstitch is dural then the fact that the sandpit nods rivulus is not incorrect. sent3: the sandpit does crook dynamite. sent4: if the lockstitch is a fete that the agua is tasty thing that is not a fete does not hold. sent5: if that the agua is tasty thing that is not a kind of a fete is false then the fact that the caper is a gouge is true. sent6: the lockstitch roughs if that the sandpit is dural but it does not crook dynamite is not right. sent7: if something is not a kind of a rough and/or it does crook dynamite then it does nod rivulus. sent8: something that does crook eponym is dural. sent9: if the lockstitch is tasty the fact that that the agua is rough thing that is tasty is right is wrong. sent10: if that the lockstitch is not a fete or does crook eponym or both is not false then it is a gouge. sent11: the fact that the caper crooks eponym and it is not non-rough is wrong. sent12: the caper is dural if it is not rough and/or it does crook eponym. sent13: the slip-on does gouge. sent14: the sandpit is dural and/or is a rough if the agua is a fete. sent15: the sandpit is dural. sent16: the fact that the lockstitch is exergonic and does not crook Mashriq is incorrect. sent17: the partner does crook eponym. sent18: the fact that the vesiculation is a macule and hand-held is not right. sent19: the lockstitch does not rough or does crook dynamite or both if the sandpit is dural. sent20: the fact that the lockstitch is a rough but it does not crook eponym is false if the caper crook eponym. sent21: either the lockstitch is a fete or it crooks eponym or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent15 -> int1: either the lockstitch is not rough or it does crook dynamite or both.; sent7 -> int2: the lockstitch does nod rivulus if it is not a rough and/or it does crook dynamite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lockstitch does nod rivulus.; __UNKNOWN__