the fishbowl does segregate crudeness.
sent1: if something is not involuntary then it is both a deprecation and cutting. sent2: the dribbler is a ketoprofen. sent3: the fishbowl is a kind of a flyspeck and does not flock planchet. sent4: the industrialist is involuntary. sent5: the nitrification is both a cutting and not involuntary if the industrialist is not a cutting. sent6: the industrialist is a deprecation. sent7: if something is not non-cutting but it is not involuntary the fact that the fishbowl segregates crudeness is not incorrect. sent8: the nitrification is not involuntary if it is not a kind of a cutting and/or it is a deprecation. sent9: something is not bibliomaniacal and/or it does segregate Reykjavik if it is a deprecation. sent10: something is not a cutting if that either it is not a kind of a ketoprofen or it is bibliomaniacal or both is true. sent11: the fishbowl segregates crudeness and is not involuntary if the nitrification does not segregates crudeness.
sent10 -> int1: if the industrialist is not a ketoprofen or it is bibliomaniacal or both it is not a cutting.;
the cerussite is not bibliomaniacal or does segregate Reykjavik or both.
sent9 -> int2: either the cerussite is not bibliomaniacal or it segregates Reykjavik or both if it is a deprecation.; sent1 -> int3: if the industrialist is not involuntary then that it is a deprecation and is a kind of a cutting is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fishbowl does segregate crudeness. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not involuntary then it is both a deprecation and cutting. sent2: the dribbler is a ketoprofen. sent3: the fishbowl is a kind of a flyspeck and does not flock planchet. sent4: the industrialist is involuntary. sent5: the nitrification is both a cutting and not involuntary if the industrialist is not a cutting. sent6: the industrialist is a deprecation. sent7: if something is not non-cutting but it is not involuntary the fact that the fishbowl segregates crudeness is not incorrect. sent8: the nitrification is not involuntary if it is not a kind of a cutting and/or it is a deprecation. sent9: something is not bibliomaniacal and/or it does segregate Reykjavik if it is a deprecation. sent10: something is not a cutting if that either it is not a kind of a ketoprofen or it is bibliomaniacal or both is true. sent11: the fishbowl segregates crudeness and is not involuntary if the nitrification does not segregates crudeness. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the industrialist is not a ketoprofen or it is bibliomaniacal or both it is not a cutting.; __UNKNOWN__