the cowherb is not a pogonia.
sent1: if the aquamarine does knit vaporizer and does trivialize androsterone the fact that the sub-assembly does not trivialize Callithrix is right. sent2: if the aquamarine does not trivialize androsterone it trivializes Callithrix. sent3: the aquamarine does theme shampoo if the cowherb trivializes Callithrix. sent4: something that knits vaporizer is a pogonia. sent5: that if the chamberlain is not the curettage then the chamberlain does patronage hold. sent6: the fact that something does not trivialize androsterone and does coat postmark is incorrect if it does not trivialize peoples. sent7: if the sub-assembly does not theme shampoo the cowherb is a pogonia and does knit vaporizer. sent8: if the aquamarine does theme shampoo and it does trivialize Callithrix the cowherb is not a pogonia. sent9: the sub-assembly themes shampoo. sent10: the aquamarine does theme shampoo if the sub-assembly does knit vaporizer. sent11: the saxifrage does not theme shampoo. sent12: the cowherb does trivialize androsterone if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does not trivialize androsterone and coats postmark is right is not correct. sent13: the fact that the aquamarine does trivialize androsterone is not true. sent14: if there is something such that it does trivialize androsterone then the fact that the aquamarine does not trivialize androsterone and is a pogonia is incorrect. sent15: the aquamarine is a rurality. sent16: something does not knit vaporizer if that it does not trivialize androsterone and is a kind of a pogonia does not hold. sent17: The vaporizer knits sub-assembly. sent18: the sub-assembly does not trivialize Callithrix if the aquamarine does not trivialize Callithrix. sent19: The fact that the androsterone does trivialize aquamarine is not true. sent20: the sub-assembly does not trivialize Callithrix if the aquamarine themes shampoo. sent21: if the aquamarine knits vaporizer the sub-assembly does theme shampoo. sent22: the sub-assembly is supervisory and it does seem. sent23: everything does not trivialize peoples.
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the aquamarine does trivialize Callithrix.;
the cowherb is a kind of a pogonia.
sent4 -> int2: if the cowherb knits vaporizer it is a pogonia.;
$hypothesis$ = the cowherb is not a pogonia. ; $context$ = sent1: if the aquamarine does knit vaporizer and does trivialize androsterone the fact that the sub-assembly does not trivialize Callithrix is right. sent2: if the aquamarine does not trivialize androsterone it trivializes Callithrix. sent3: the aquamarine does theme shampoo if the cowherb trivializes Callithrix. sent4: something that knits vaporizer is a pogonia. sent5: that if the chamberlain is not the curettage then the chamberlain does patronage hold. sent6: the fact that something does not trivialize androsterone and does coat postmark is incorrect if it does not trivialize peoples. sent7: if the sub-assembly does not theme shampoo the cowherb is a pogonia and does knit vaporizer. sent8: if the aquamarine does theme shampoo and it does trivialize Callithrix the cowherb is not a pogonia. sent9: the sub-assembly themes shampoo. sent10: the aquamarine does theme shampoo if the sub-assembly does knit vaporizer. sent11: the saxifrage does not theme shampoo. sent12: the cowherb does trivialize androsterone if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does not trivialize androsterone and coats postmark is right is not correct. sent13: the fact that the aquamarine does trivialize androsterone is not true. sent14: if there is something such that it does trivialize androsterone then the fact that the aquamarine does not trivialize androsterone and is a pogonia is incorrect. sent15: the aquamarine is a rurality. sent16: something does not knit vaporizer if that it does not trivialize androsterone and is a kind of a pogonia does not hold. sent17: The vaporizer knits sub-assembly. sent18: the sub-assembly does not trivialize Callithrix if the aquamarine does not trivialize Callithrix. sent19: The fact that the androsterone does trivialize aquamarine is not true. sent20: the sub-assembly does not trivialize Callithrix if the aquamarine themes shampoo. sent21: if the aquamarine knits vaporizer the sub-assembly does theme shampoo. sent22: the sub-assembly is supervisory and it does seem. sent23: everything does not trivialize peoples. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: the aquamarine does trivialize Callithrix.; __UNKNOWN__