the luciferin is hypertonic.
sent1: the luciferin is hypertonic if the romantic is a Bombyx. sent2: the romantic is a Bombyx if there exists something such that that it misfires or it is apomictic or both does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that either it does misfire or it is not apomictic or both is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a misfire or it is not apomictic or both is not correct then the romantic is a kind of a Bombyx. sent5: something misfires and/or it is not apomictic. sent6: if something is a kind of hypertonic thing that does not cloud huckleberry it is not a Bombyx. sent7: there is something such that it is apomictic.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the romantic is a Bombyx.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the luciferin is apomictic.
sent6 -> int2: if the romantic is hypertonic but it does not cloud huckleberry then it is not a Bombyx.;
$hypothesis$ = the luciferin is hypertonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the luciferin is hypertonic if the romantic is a Bombyx. sent2: the romantic is a Bombyx if there exists something such that that it misfires or it is apomictic or both does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that either it does misfire or it is not apomictic or both is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a misfire or it is not apomictic or both is not correct then the romantic is a kind of a Bombyx. sent5: something misfires and/or it is not apomictic. sent6: if something is a kind of hypertonic thing that does not cloud huckleberry it is not a Bombyx. sent7: there is something such that it is apomictic. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the romantic is a Bombyx.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__