the receiver is not clonic.
sent1: there exists something such that it either is not abstract or does enjoy bohemian or both. sent2: the threonine is not a gluon but it is clonic. sent3: if there is something such that it does spoon brittleness then the expressionist is not a Monet. sent4: if the expressionist is not a Monet and is not a hyaline the terrorist does not spoon brittleness. sent5: if something is micaceous and/or it spoons brittleness then the expressionist is not a Monet. sent6: something does spoon plop if it is both not a hyaline and a Monet. sent7: something does not spoon brittleness if it is not a Monet. sent8: the fact that the forelimb is a kind of a gluon and it is clonic is false. sent9: the terrorist is a spammer and it abstracts. sent10: the forelimb is a Monet. sent11: the receiver is non-clonic if something spoons plop and is abstract. sent12: there exists something such that it abstracts. sent13: the pollutant is clonic. sent14: the receiver is clonic if the expressionist is clonic. sent15: if something does not abstract then that it does spoon plop and it is a hyaline is not correct. sent16: the forelimb is not a hyaline but a Monet if the expressionist is not a Monet. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it is ununderstood but not Albigensian is not true. sent18: if something that enjoys bohemian is micaceous the Centre is not a gluon. sent19: if there is something such that either it is clonic or it is micaceous or both then the Centre is not a Monet. sent20: the threonine does not abstract if either something is not abstract or it enjoys bohemian or both. sent21: there is something such that that it enjoys bohemian and it is a kind of a gluon is not correct. sent22: if there is something such that it is a kind of a gluon then the forelimb abstracts. sent23: the Centre does not spoon brittleness and enjoys bohemian. sent24: the fact that the threonine enjoys bohemian but it is not a gluon is incorrect. sent25: the forelimb is abstract if there exists something such that the fact that it does enjoy bohemian and is not a gluon does not hold.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the forelimb spoons plop if the forelimb is not a hyaline and is a Monet is correct.; sent24 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it enjoys bohemian and is not a kind of a gluon is incorrect.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the forelimb abstracts.;
the receiver is clonic.
sent7 -> int4: if the forelimb is not a Monet then it does not spoon brittleness.; sent15 -> int5: if the threonine does not abstract then the fact that it spoons plop and is a kind of a hyaline is not right.; sent1 & sent20 -> int6: the threonine is not abstract.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the threonine does spoon plop and it is a kind of a hyaline does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it spoons plop and it is a hyaline is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the receiver is not clonic. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it either is not abstract or does enjoy bohemian or both. sent2: the threonine is not a gluon but it is clonic. sent3: if there is something such that it does spoon brittleness then the expressionist is not a Monet. sent4: if the expressionist is not a Monet and is not a hyaline the terrorist does not spoon brittleness. sent5: if something is micaceous and/or it spoons brittleness then the expressionist is not a Monet. sent6: something does spoon plop if it is both not a hyaline and a Monet. sent7: something does not spoon brittleness if it is not a Monet. sent8: the fact that the forelimb is a kind of a gluon and it is clonic is false. sent9: the terrorist is a spammer and it abstracts. sent10: the forelimb is a Monet. sent11: the receiver is non-clonic if something spoons plop and is abstract. sent12: there exists something such that it abstracts. sent13: the pollutant is clonic. sent14: the receiver is clonic if the expressionist is clonic. sent15: if something does not abstract then that it does spoon plop and it is a hyaline is not correct. sent16: the forelimb is not a hyaline but a Monet if the expressionist is not a Monet. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it is ununderstood but not Albigensian is not true. sent18: if something that enjoys bohemian is micaceous the Centre is not a gluon. sent19: if there is something such that either it is clonic or it is micaceous or both then the Centre is not a Monet. sent20: the threonine does not abstract if either something is not abstract or it enjoys bohemian or both. sent21: there is something such that that it enjoys bohemian and it is a kind of a gluon is not correct. sent22: if there is something such that it is a kind of a gluon then the forelimb abstracts. sent23: the Centre does not spoon brittleness and enjoys bohemian. sent24: the fact that the threonine enjoys bohemian but it is not a gluon is incorrect. sent25: the forelimb is abstract if there exists something such that the fact that it does enjoy bohemian and is not a gluon does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the forelimb spoons plop if the forelimb is not a hyaline and is a Monet is correct.; sent24 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it enjoys bohemian and is not a kind of a gluon is incorrect.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the forelimb abstracts.; __UNKNOWN__