the fact that the activator does not furnish but it is a Tuscany is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that it is not a Lisu. sent2: the punkie is irremediable. sent3: the fact that the azide is not a tonometry is not wrong. sent4: if the oilpaper is a tonometry it is zygodactyl. sent5: if the azide is non-emptying thing that is Singhalese it is zygodactyl. sent6: the cuscus is a unoriginality if there is something such that it extends rightism and furnishes. sent7: the tackle does not extend rightism. sent8: The rightism does not extend tackle. sent9: the activator is not irremediable. sent10: if the punkie is irremediable then the fact that it is Singhalese is not wrong. sent11: if something that is a unoriginality is a Lisu it does not extend Yerevan. sent12: if something is bignoniaceous it is Orthodox. sent13: the oilpaper is Singhalese if the punkie is Singhalese. sent14: that the oilpaper extends rightism is correct. sent15: that the cuscus is a tonometry and it does extend Yerevan does not hold. sent16: if there are emptying and Singhalese things then the cuscus is a kind of a unoriginality. sent17: the azide is non-Singhalese if that the oilpaper is a kind of a unoriginality that is non-Singhalese is false. sent18: that that the tackle does not blue but it is a tonometry is not wrong is not right. sent19: the fact that the oilpaper is zygodactyl is not incorrect if the azide is not a tonometry. sent20: something does empty if it is zygodactyl. sent21: the fact that the activator is not a Tuscany but Singhalese is not correct. sent22: there exists something such that it is not non-west. sent23: the fact that the activator does not furnish but it is a Tuscany is not true if the cuscus does not extend Yerevan. sent24: if the tackle does not extend rightism the cuscus is a kind of a Lisu.
sent19 & sent3 -> int1: the oilpaper is zygodactyl.; sent20 -> int2: the oilpaper is emptying if the fact that it is zygodactyl hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the oilpaper empties.; sent10 & sent2 -> int4: that the punkie is Singhalese hold.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the oilpaper is Singhalese.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the oilpaper does empty and it is Singhalese.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does empty and it is Singhalese.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the cuscus is a unoriginality.; sent24 & sent7 -> int9: the cuscus is a Lisu.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the cuscus is a unoriginality and it is a Lisu.; sent11 -> int11: the cuscus does not extend Yerevan if it is a unoriginality and it is a kind of a Lisu.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the cuscus does not extend Yerevan.; int12 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
the Paradise is a tonometry.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the activator does not furnish but it is a Tuscany is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not a Lisu. sent2: the punkie is irremediable. sent3: the fact that the azide is not a tonometry is not wrong. sent4: if the oilpaper is a tonometry it is zygodactyl. sent5: if the azide is non-emptying thing that is Singhalese it is zygodactyl. sent6: the cuscus is a unoriginality if there is something such that it extends rightism and furnishes. sent7: the tackle does not extend rightism. sent8: The rightism does not extend tackle. sent9: the activator is not irremediable. sent10: if the punkie is irremediable then the fact that it is Singhalese is not wrong. sent11: if something that is a unoriginality is a Lisu it does not extend Yerevan. sent12: if something is bignoniaceous it is Orthodox. sent13: the oilpaper is Singhalese if the punkie is Singhalese. sent14: that the oilpaper extends rightism is correct. sent15: that the cuscus is a tonometry and it does extend Yerevan does not hold. sent16: if there are emptying and Singhalese things then the cuscus is a kind of a unoriginality. sent17: the azide is non-Singhalese if that the oilpaper is a kind of a unoriginality that is non-Singhalese is false. sent18: that that the tackle does not blue but it is a tonometry is not wrong is not right. sent19: the fact that the oilpaper is zygodactyl is not incorrect if the azide is not a tonometry. sent20: something does empty if it is zygodactyl. sent21: the fact that the activator is not a Tuscany but Singhalese is not correct. sent22: there exists something such that it is not non-west. sent23: the fact that the activator does not furnish but it is a Tuscany is not true if the cuscus does not extend Yerevan. sent24: if the tackle does not extend rightism the cuscus is a kind of a Lisu. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent3 -> int1: the oilpaper is zygodactyl.; sent20 -> int2: the oilpaper is emptying if the fact that it is zygodactyl hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the oilpaper empties.; sent10 & sent2 -> int4: that the punkie is Singhalese hold.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the oilpaper is Singhalese.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the oilpaper does empty and it is Singhalese.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does empty and it is Singhalese.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the cuscus is a unoriginality.; sent24 & sent7 -> int9: the cuscus is a Lisu.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the cuscus is a unoriginality and it is a Lisu.; sent11 -> int11: the cuscus does not extend Yerevan if it is a unoriginality and it is a kind of a Lisu.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the cuscus does not extend Yerevan.; int12 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__