if the Saharan happens then that either the abundantness happens or the kicking does not occur or both is incorrect.
sent1: the surfacing Irishman happens and/or the debriefing backbencher does not occur if the mercantilism happens. sent2: if the amplifying qadi does not occur then that either the Czech or the non-reductionistness or both occurs is not correct. sent3: that either the debriefing Bowdlerism happens or the mumble does not occur or both is false if the windward happens. sent4: the fact that either the yodeling occurs or the operationalness does not occur or both is wrong. sent5: that the crosscheck occurs is prevented by either the Polynesian or that the debriefing Bowdlerism does not occur or both. sent6: that either the abundantness happens or the kick does not occur or both leads to the Saharanness. sent7: either the idealization occurs or the Cameroonian does not occur or both if the philanthropicness occurs. sent8: the Saharanness but not the amplifying qadi occurs if the crosscheck does not occur. sent9: if the abundantness happens or the kick does not occur or both the Saharan does not occur. sent10: the gardening does not occur if the spoiling peoples does not occur. sent11: if the Saharanness occurs then the kicking occurs. sent12: that the thrombectomy does not occur triggers the non-Estonianness.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the abundantness occurs or the kick does not occur or both.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the Saharan does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Saharanness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the abundantness occurs and/or the kick does not occur does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the Czech or the non-reductionistness or both happens is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = if the Saharan happens then that either the abundantness happens or the kicking does not occur or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the surfacing Irishman happens and/or the debriefing backbencher does not occur if the mercantilism happens. sent2: if the amplifying qadi does not occur then that either the Czech or the non-reductionistness or both occurs is not correct. sent3: that either the debriefing Bowdlerism happens or the mumble does not occur or both is false if the windward happens. sent4: the fact that either the yodeling occurs or the operationalness does not occur or both is wrong. sent5: that the crosscheck occurs is prevented by either the Polynesian or that the debriefing Bowdlerism does not occur or both. sent6: that either the abundantness happens or the kick does not occur or both leads to the Saharanness. sent7: either the idealization occurs or the Cameroonian does not occur or both if the philanthropicness occurs. sent8: the Saharanness but not the amplifying qadi occurs if the crosscheck does not occur. sent9: if the abundantness happens or the kick does not occur or both the Saharan does not occur. sent10: the gardening does not occur if the spoiling peoples does not occur. sent11: if the Saharanness occurs then the kicking occurs. sent12: that the thrombectomy does not occur triggers the non-Estonianness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the abundantness occurs or the kick does not occur or both.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the Saharan does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Saharanness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the abundantness occurs and/or the kick does not occur does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__