the carpel is exodontic and/or is not uncooperative.
sent1: the fact that something is a salaam hold. sent2: the alexandrite is uncooperative or does not glamorize or both. sent3: the alexandrite does not glamorize if there is something such that the fact that it shelters Confederate and it is not non-partitive does not hold. sent4: the Confederate does not distinguish peasant if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a salaam that is a partitive is incorrect. sent5: if there exists something such that it glamorizes either the alexandrite is not non-partitive or it is not a salaam or both. sent6: that the Confederate is not a salaam hold. sent7: the must either does distinguish peasant or is uncooperative or both. sent8: either the carpel is exodontic or it is not uncooperative or both if there is something such that it does distinguish peasant. sent9: the Confederate is not a shore. sent10: the fact that if there is something such that it is not exodontic then the carpel does not salaam is correct. sent11: there is something such that it does glamorize. sent12: the fact that the Confederate salaams and it is uncooperative does not hold. sent13: if the Confederate is not a salaam then the fact that it does shelter Confederate and it is a kind of a partitive is not true.
sent13 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Confederate does shelter Confederate and it is a partitive is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does shelter Confederate and is partitive is false.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the alexandrite does not glamorize.;
$hypothesis$ = the carpel is exodontic and/or is not uncooperative. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a salaam hold. sent2: the alexandrite is uncooperative or does not glamorize or both. sent3: the alexandrite does not glamorize if there is something such that the fact that it shelters Confederate and it is not non-partitive does not hold. sent4: the Confederate does not distinguish peasant if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a salaam that is a partitive is incorrect. sent5: if there exists something such that it glamorizes either the alexandrite is not non-partitive or it is not a salaam or both. sent6: that the Confederate is not a salaam hold. sent7: the must either does distinguish peasant or is uncooperative or both. sent8: either the carpel is exodontic or it is not uncooperative or both if there is something such that it does distinguish peasant. sent9: the Confederate is not a shore. sent10: the fact that if there is something such that it is not exodontic then the carpel does not salaam is correct. sent11: there is something such that it does glamorize. sent12: the fact that the Confederate salaams and it is uncooperative does not hold. sent13: if the Confederate is not a salaam then the fact that it does shelter Confederate and it is a kind of a partitive is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Confederate does shelter Confederate and it is a partitive is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does shelter Confederate and is partitive is false.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the alexandrite does not glamorize.; __UNKNOWN__