the housekeeping ampersand does not occur.
sent1: the oleophobicness does not occur and the housekeeping tormenter occurs if the justifying Iguanodontidae occurs. sent2: if the relacing ichthyologist happens the hitch occurs. sent3: if the abscondment does not occur the housekeeping ampersand does not occur and the exuvialness does not occur. sent4: that both the non-Laoness and the abscondment occurs is not false. sent5: the relacing ichthyologist but not the cinch happens if the justifying entail does not occur. sent6: if both the non-modernness and the non-myeloidness happens then the exuvialness does not occur. sent7: that the justifying Iguanodontidae occurs if that the justifying Iguanodontidae does not occur and the crash does not occur is not right hold. sent8: the housekeeping ampersand occurs if that the nonmodernness and the non-myeloidness happens is wrong. sent9: the Lao but not the abscondment occurs if the hitching happens. sent10: the exuvialness occurs if the non-Laoness and the abscondment happens. sent11: that the justifying entail does not occur and the lay occurs is brought about by the non-oleophobicness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the modernness does not occur and the myeloidness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the exuvialness does not occur.; sent10 & sent4 -> int2: the exuvialness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the modernness does not occur and the myeloidness does not occur does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the housekeeping ampersand does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the housekeeping ampersand does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the oleophobicness does not occur and the housekeeping tormenter occurs if the justifying Iguanodontidae occurs. sent2: if the relacing ichthyologist happens the hitch occurs. sent3: if the abscondment does not occur the housekeeping ampersand does not occur and the exuvialness does not occur. sent4: that both the non-Laoness and the abscondment occurs is not false. sent5: the relacing ichthyologist but not the cinch happens if the justifying entail does not occur. sent6: if both the non-modernness and the non-myeloidness happens then the exuvialness does not occur. sent7: that the justifying Iguanodontidae occurs if that the justifying Iguanodontidae does not occur and the crash does not occur is not right hold. sent8: the housekeeping ampersand occurs if that the nonmodernness and the non-myeloidness happens is wrong. sent9: the Lao but not the abscondment occurs if the hitching happens. sent10: the exuvialness occurs if the non-Laoness and the abscondment happens. sent11: that the justifying entail does not occur and the lay occurs is brought about by the non-oleophobicness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the modernness does not occur and the myeloidness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the exuvialness does not occur.; sent10 & sent4 -> int2: the exuvialness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the modernness does not occur and the myeloidness does not occur does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__