there exists something such that if it is a titrator then the fact that it does not apply and is not apocalyptic does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a legislation the fact that that it does not populate closure and loots Trinidadian is true is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is academic the fact that it is not a Fallot but cenobitic is false. sent3: if the Trinidadian is indexless then that it is not a whorehouse and it is a kind of a titrator is incorrect. sent4: the fact that something does not sleep and it does not cast Calvin does not hold if that it is a libido is not wrong. sent5: if something is nonfictional the fact that it is both not a northeaster and not a defacement is not true. sent6: there is something such that if that it loots Hoffmann is not wrong that it does not populate endocrine and metamorphoses is incorrect. sent7: there is something such that if it is anaphylactic the fact that it does not cast Smiledon and it loots corkage is not correct. sent8: that something is a dandelion but it is not a Doric is not right if it is polymorphous. sent9: if something is a kind of a titrator that it does not apply and it is not apocalyptic does not hold. sent10: that something does not populate maxilla and casts Smiledon is not correct if it is nominalistic. sent11: that something is non-low-tech thing that is a bind is not true if it populates leatherleaf. sent12: if the Trinidadian is a spindleberry the fact that it is a kind of non-ciliary thing that is not a kind of a titrator does not hold. sent13: that the fact that the drug is not a titrator and it is not a Python is not false is not right if it plows. sent14: if something rivets Ufa that it does rivet scum and it is not a bouillon is not right. sent15: there exists something such that if it does rivet herald then that it is a kind of a Lactuca and it is non-branchiopod is not true.
sent9 -> int1: if the Trinidadian is a titrator the fact that it does not apply and it is not apocalyptic is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a titrator then the fact that it does not apply and is not apocalyptic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a legislation the fact that that it does not populate closure and loots Trinidadian is true is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is academic the fact that it is not a Fallot but cenobitic is false. sent3: if the Trinidadian is indexless then that it is not a whorehouse and it is a kind of a titrator is incorrect. sent4: the fact that something does not sleep and it does not cast Calvin does not hold if that it is a libido is not wrong. sent5: if something is nonfictional the fact that it is both not a northeaster and not a defacement is not true. sent6: there is something such that if that it loots Hoffmann is not wrong that it does not populate endocrine and metamorphoses is incorrect. sent7: there is something such that if it is anaphylactic the fact that it does not cast Smiledon and it loots corkage is not correct. sent8: that something is a dandelion but it is not a Doric is not right if it is polymorphous. sent9: if something is a kind of a titrator that it does not apply and it is not apocalyptic does not hold. sent10: that something does not populate maxilla and casts Smiledon is not correct if it is nominalistic. sent11: that something is non-low-tech thing that is a bind is not true if it populates leatherleaf. sent12: if the Trinidadian is a spindleberry the fact that it is a kind of non-ciliary thing that is not a kind of a titrator does not hold. sent13: that the fact that the drug is not a titrator and it is not a Python is not false is not right if it plows. sent14: if something rivets Ufa that it does rivet scum and it is not a bouillon is not right. sent15: there exists something such that if it does rivet herald then that it is a kind of a Lactuca and it is non-branchiopod is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the Trinidadian is a titrator the fact that it does not apply and it is not apocalyptic is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__