the stub is unexpendable.
sent1: something criticizes termination. sent2: if there is something such that it criticizes termination then the stub is immoral and it is nontechnical. sent3: that something is a kind of a morality is true if it is a sequencer. sent4: if the stub is not unexpendable it is a sequencer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stub is not unexpendable.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the stub is a sequencer.; sent3 -> int2: if the stub is a sequencer then it is a morality.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stub is a kind of a morality.; sent1 & sent2 -> int4: the stub is immoral and it is nontechnical.;
$hypothesis$ = the stub is unexpendable. ; $context$ = sent1: something criticizes termination. sent2: if there is something such that it criticizes termination then the stub is immoral and it is nontechnical. sent3: that something is a kind of a morality is true if it is a sequencer. sent4: if the stub is not unexpendable it is a sequencer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stub is not unexpendable.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the stub is a sequencer.; sent3 -> int2: if the stub is a sequencer then it is a morality.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stub is a kind of a morality.; sent1 & sent2 -> int4: the stub is immoral and it is nontechnical.; __UNKNOWN__