there exists something such that if it is a kind of an oversimplification that it is linguistic and it does not export is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if it is an oversimplification then it is linguistic and it is not an export. sent2: if something is not an export and it is not linguistic then it is not a morsel. sent3: something is nonlinguistic and it is not an oversimplification if it does not add. sent4: there is something such that if that it dims hold it is a kind of a secondary and it is not intralinguistic. sent5: that the Liquidambar is not meaningful and it does not hunger brush is not true. sent6: if the grosgrain does burglarize eudemon it is not bibliographic. sent7: that the grosgrain orchestrates co-option is right. sent8: the fact that the Macon is linguistic is not false. sent9: there exists something such that if it reciprocates then that it is not non-camphoric and it is a kind of a oxtant is incorrect. sent10: if that the Liquidambar is not meaningful and does not hunger brush is false then it is not a kind of an export. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it is a slurry it is a Confucian and does not burglarize riff is not incorrect. sent12: the brush does hunger apar. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a battlefront then that it is a kind of intralinguistic thing that burglarizes eudemon is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brush is linguistic and does not export.; assump1 -> int1: the brush is not an export.;
the Liquidambar is not a morsel.
sent2 -> int2: the Liquidambar is not a morsel if it is not a kind of an export and it is not linguistic.; sent10 & sent5 -> int3: the Liquidambar does not export.; sent3 -> int4: if the Liquidambar does not add then it is both not linguistic and not an oversimplification.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of an oversimplification that it is linguistic and it does not export is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is an oversimplification then it is linguistic and it is not an export. sent2: if something is not an export and it is not linguistic then it is not a morsel. sent3: something is nonlinguistic and it is not an oversimplification if it does not add. sent4: there is something such that if that it dims hold it is a kind of a secondary and it is not intralinguistic. sent5: that the Liquidambar is not meaningful and it does not hunger brush is not true. sent6: if the grosgrain does burglarize eudemon it is not bibliographic. sent7: that the grosgrain orchestrates co-option is right. sent8: the fact that the Macon is linguistic is not false. sent9: there exists something such that if it reciprocates then that it is not non-camphoric and it is a kind of a oxtant is incorrect. sent10: if that the Liquidambar is not meaningful and does not hunger brush is false then it is not a kind of an export. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it is a slurry it is a Confucian and does not burglarize riff is not incorrect. sent12: the brush does hunger apar. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a battlefront then that it is a kind of intralinguistic thing that burglarizes eudemon is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brush is linguistic and does not export.; assump1 -> int1: the brush is not an export.; __UNKNOWN__