the adducting Titian does not occur.
sent1: the accompanying does not occur. sent2: the binariness happens. sent3: the turning Comte does not occur if the lambing injunction but not the fusion occurs. sent4: the station happens and the lambing injunction does not occur. sent5: both the neuropsychiatricness and the intonation occurs. sent6: the gambit occurs and the adducting Prunus does not occur. sent7: the station occurs. sent8: that the wearing shamrock does not occur is correct. sent9: that the neuropsychiatricness but not the accompanying happens prevents the adducting Titian. sent10: the remedying happens. sent11: the intonation occurs. sent12: the photographing does not occur.
sent5 -> int1: the neuropsychiatricness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the neuropsychiatricness happens but the accompanying does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the adducting Titian does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the accompanying does not occur. sent2: the binariness happens. sent3: the turning Comte does not occur if the lambing injunction but not the fusion occurs. sent4: the station happens and the lambing injunction does not occur. sent5: both the neuropsychiatricness and the intonation occurs. sent6: the gambit occurs and the adducting Prunus does not occur. sent7: the station occurs. sent8: that the wearing shamrock does not occur is correct. sent9: that the neuropsychiatricness but not the accompanying happens prevents the adducting Titian. sent10: the remedying happens. sent11: the intonation occurs. sent12: the photographing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the neuropsychiatricness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the neuropsychiatricness happens but the accompanying does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__