the dampener is synoptic.
sent1: if that the stratus occidentalizes rancher and it is altruistic is not true then it does not horripilate asystole. sent2: that either the antimacassar is a spy or it is not a whirler or both is wrong if it reposits laryngoscope. sent3: if the fact that the azurite is not unplayful hold that the weeper does not occidentalize rancher and it is unplayful is not right. sent4: the fact that the antimacassar horripilates asystole and it is a whirler is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the weeper occidentalizes rancher but it is not unplayful does not hold. sent6: the fact that the stratus is inflationary and does horripilate asystole does not hold. sent7: if the azurite is not unplayful the fact that the weeper does not occidentalize rancher but it is unplayful does not hold. sent8: the dampener does reposit laryngoscope if the fact that the antimacassar is both inflationary and not unplayful is wrong. sent9: the fact that the azurite is not unplayful hold if the stratus horripilates asystole. sent10: if the stratus does not horripilate asystole then that that the antimacassar is not a spy but it does horripilate asystole is not incorrect is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that something is a spy and/or is not a whirler does not hold then it is inflationary. sent12: the azurite is not unplayful if the fact that the stratus is inflationary but it does not horripilate asystole does not hold. sent13: the fact that the azurite is unplayful and it reposits laryngoscope is not right if that the antimacassar is unplayful is true. sent14: if something does reposit laryngoscope then it is synoptic. sent15: that if the antimacassar is inflationary the fact that the stratus is inflationary and horripilates asystole is not correct is not false. sent16: the dampener is not synoptic if that the weeper does not occidentalize rancher and it is playful does not hold. sent17: that the weeper does occidentalize rancher and is not unplayful is not true if the azurite is not unplayful. sent18: The laryngoscope does reposit antimacassar. sent19: the antimacassar does reposit laryngoscope. sent20: if the antimacassar reposits laryngoscope then it is not a kind of a spy. sent21: if the antimacassar does horripilate asystole then the stratus is not inflationary. sent22: if the antimacassar is inflationary then that the stratus is inflationary thing that does not horripilate asystole does not hold. sent23: the antimacassar does not horripilate asystole if the stratus reposits laryngoscope. sent24: if the fact that something is unplayful and/or it does occidentalize rancher is false it is synoptic.
sent2 & sent19 -> int1: the fact that the antimacassar is a spy and/or it is not a kind of a whirler is not right.; sent11 -> int2: the antimacassar is inflationary if that it spies or it is not a kind of a whirler or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the antimacassar is inflationary is correct.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the fact that the stratus is a kind of inflationary thing that does not horripilate asystole is not true.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the azurite is not unplayful.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the weeper does not occidentalize rancher and is not unplayful is incorrect.; int6 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the dampener is synoptic.
sent14 -> int7: the dampener is synoptic if it does reposit laryngoscope.;
$hypothesis$ = the dampener is synoptic. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the stratus occidentalizes rancher and it is altruistic is not true then it does not horripilate asystole. sent2: that either the antimacassar is a spy or it is not a whirler or both is wrong if it reposits laryngoscope. sent3: if the fact that the azurite is not unplayful hold that the weeper does not occidentalize rancher and it is unplayful is not right. sent4: the fact that the antimacassar horripilates asystole and it is a whirler is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the weeper occidentalizes rancher but it is not unplayful does not hold. sent6: the fact that the stratus is inflationary and does horripilate asystole does not hold. sent7: if the azurite is not unplayful the fact that the weeper does not occidentalize rancher but it is unplayful does not hold. sent8: the dampener does reposit laryngoscope if the fact that the antimacassar is both inflationary and not unplayful is wrong. sent9: the fact that the azurite is not unplayful hold if the stratus horripilates asystole. sent10: if the stratus does not horripilate asystole then that that the antimacassar is not a spy but it does horripilate asystole is not incorrect is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that something is a spy and/or is not a whirler does not hold then it is inflationary. sent12: the azurite is not unplayful if the fact that the stratus is inflationary but it does not horripilate asystole does not hold. sent13: the fact that the azurite is unplayful and it reposits laryngoscope is not right if that the antimacassar is unplayful is true. sent14: if something does reposit laryngoscope then it is synoptic. sent15: that if the antimacassar is inflationary the fact that the stratus is inflationary and horripilates asystole is not correct is not false. sent16: the dampener is not synoptic if that the weeper does not occidentalize rancher and it is playful does not hold. sent17: that the weeper does occidentalize rancher and is not unplayful is not true if the azurite is not unplayful. sent18: The laryngoscope does reposit antimacassar. sent19: the antimacassar does reposit laryngoscope. sent20: if the antimacassar reposits laryngoscope then it is not a kind of a spy. sent21: if the antimacassar does horripilate asystole then the stratus is not inflationary. sent22: if the antimacassar is inflationary then that the stratus is inflationary thing that does not horripilate asystole does not hold. sent23: the antimacassar does not horripilate asystole if the stratus reposits laryngoscope. sent24: if the fact that something is unplayful and/or it does occidentalize rancher is false it is synoptic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent19 -> int1: the fact that the antimacassar is a spy and/or it is not a kind of a whirler is not right.; sent11 -> int2: the antimacassar is inflationary if that it spies or it is not a kind of a whirler or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the antimacassar is inflationary is correct.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the fact that the stratus is a kind of inflationary thing that does not horripilate asystole is not true.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the azurite is not unplayful.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the weeper does not occidentalize rancher and is not unplayful is incorrect.; int6 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__