the stoloniferousness occurs.
sent1: not the rehabilitating awe but the asciticness occurs if the chastening dacryon does not occur. sent2: the regicide does not occur. sent3: the waterspout happens and the spasm occurs. sent4: the fact that the disturbance occurs and the commutableness occurs is incorrect. sent5: the backingness happens if the Rembrandtesqueness occurs. sent6: if the Moon does not occur then the fact that the tessellation does not occur and the industrialization happens does not hold. sent7: if that the disturbance and the commutableness happens is not correct then the commutableness does not occur. sent8: if the spasm does not occur the waterspout does not occur. sent9: that either the Rembrandtesqueness or the phototherapy or both happens does not hold. sent10: if that the interconnection happens and the spasm occurs is wrong then the interconnection does not occur. sent11: the anoperinealness does not occur and the shaving occurs if that the waggery happens is right. sent12: if that the commutableness does not occur is not incorrect then the waggery does not occur but the apologeticsness occurs. sent13: that the spasm and the shaving occurs prevents the anoperinealness. sent14: the fact that the Moon does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the Moon happens and the constructiveness occurs does not hold. sent15: the fact that the disturbance does not occur is not incorrect if that not the tessellation but the industrialization happens is wrong. sent16: if that either the Rembrandtesqueness happens or the phototherapy occurs or both is incorrect then the backingness does not occur. sent17: the fact that the waggery does not occur and the anoperinealness does not occur is not correct if the backingness does not occur. sent18: that the waterspout does not occur triggers the non-stoloniferousness. sent19: that the apologeticsness does not occur and the regicide does not occur prevents that the waggery does not occur.
sent3 -> int1: the spasm occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shaving happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the spasm and the shaving happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the anoperinealness does not occur.; sent7 & sent4 -> int4: the commutableness does not occur.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the waggery does not occur but the apologeticsness happens.; int5 -> int6: the waggery does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the waggery does not occur and the anoperinealness does not occur.; sent16 & sent9 -> int8: the backing does not occur.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: that the waggery does not occur and the anoperinealness does not occur is incorrect.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the shave does not occur.; int11 & sent2 -> int12: the shave does not occur and the regicide does not occur.;
the interconnection does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the stoloniferousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: not the rehabilitating awe but the asciticness occurs if the chastening dacryon does not occur. sent2: the regicide does not occur. sent3: the waterspout happens and the spasm occurs. sent4: the fact that the disturbance occurs and the commutableness occurs is incorrect. sent5: the backingness happens if the Rembrandtesqueness occurs. sent6: if the Moon does not occur then the fact that the tessellation does not occur and the industrialization happens does not hold. sent7: if that the disturbance and the commutableness happens is not correct then the commutableness does not occur. sent8: if the spasm does not occur the waterspout does not occur. sent9: that either the Rembrandtesqueness or the phototherapy or both happens does not hold. sent10: if that the interconnection happens and the spasm occurs is wrong then the interconnection does not occur. sent11: the anoperinealness does not occur and the shaving occurs if that the waggery happens is right. sent12: if that the commutableness does not occur is not incorrect then the waggery does not occur but the apologeticsness occurs. sent13: that the spasm and the shaving occurs prevents the anoperinealness. sent14: the fact that the Moon does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the Moon happens and the constructiveness occurs does not hold. sent15: the fact that the disturbance does not occur is not incorrect if that not the tessellation but the industrialization happens is wrong. sent16: if that either the Rembrandtesqueness happens or the phototherapy occurs or both is incorrect then the backingness does not occur. sent17: the fact that the waggery does not occur and the anoperinealness does not occur is not correct if the backingness does not occur. sent18: that the waterspout does not occur triggers the non-stoloniferousness. sent19: that the apologeticsness does not occur and the regicide does not occur prevents that the waggery does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the spasm occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shaving happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the spasm and the shaving happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the anoperinealness does not occur.; sent7 & sent4 -> int4: the commutableness does not occur.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the waggery does not occur but the apologeticsness happens.; int5 -> int6: the waggery does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the waggery does not occur and the anoperinealness does not occur.; sent16 & sent9 -> int8: the backing does not occur.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: that the waggery does not occur and the anoperinealness does not occur is incorrect.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the shave does not occur.; int11 & sent2 -> int12: the shave does not occur and the regicide does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__