the Benedictineness does not occur.
sent1: the reducibleness happens. sent2: that the mnemonicness does not occur prevents that the Benedictine does not occur. sent3: if the spoiling endocrinology occurs the obligationalness happens. sent4: that the obligationalness does not occur is brought about by that the reducibleness happens and the mnemonic happens. sent5: the spoiling endocrinology occurs if the unprovocativeness happens. sent6: that the unprovocativeness occurs is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mnemonicness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the reducibleness happens and the mnemonicness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the obligationalness does not occur.; sent5 & sent6 -> int3: the spoiling endocrinology occurs.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the obligationalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mnemonic does not occur.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Benedictineness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the reducibleness happens. sent2: that the mnemonicness does not occur prevents that the Benedictine does not occur. sent3: if the spoiling endocrinology occurs the obligationalness happens. sent4: that the obligationalness does not occur is brought about by that the reducibleness happens and the mnemonic happens. sent5: the spoiling endocrinology occurs if the unprovocativeness happens. sent6: that the unprovocativeness occurs is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mnemonicness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the reducibleness happens and the mnemonicness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the obligationalness does not occur.; sent5 & sent6 -> int3: the spoiling endocrinology occurs.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the obligationalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mnemonic does not occur.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__