the Plectophera does not solemnize scarf.
sent1: the fact that the blimp does solemnize impenetrability and it is a Truffaut does not hold if the rigging is not a kind of a Truffaut. sent2: The spaced does not haze scarf. sent3: if something hazes spaced then it does solemnize scarf. sent4: that the blimp does solemnize impenetrability and it solemnizes scarf is false. sent5: if that the scarf is addictive and/or it is not gastric is not true then the fact that it does not solemnize impenetrability hold. sent6: the fact that the Plectophera does not solemnize scarf is correct if the fact that the fact that the blimp solemnizes impenetrability and it is a kind of a Truffaut hold is not true. sent7: the fact that the Plectophera does not solemnize scarf is not incorrect if the blimp does not solemnize impenetrability. sent8: if the rigging does not solemnize impenetrability the blimp is not a Truffaut. sent9: if the fact that the blimp does solemnize impenetrability and it solemnizes scarf does not hold the Plectophera is not a Truffaut. sent10: the scarf does not haze spaced. sent11: if that the scarf hazes spaced and/or it is not a Truffaut is false then the blimp does not hazes spaced. sent12: if the fact that the rigging solemnizes scarf and it does solemnize impenetrability is incorrect that the Plectophera is not a kind of a Truffaut is right. sent13: the rigging is not a Truffaut if the scarf does not haze spaced. sent14: that the Plectophera does solemnize impenetrability and solemnizes scarf is not correct. sent15: the fact that the blimp is not a laryngectomy is not wrong.
sent13 & sent10 -> int1: the rigging is not a Truffaut.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the blimp solemnizes impenetrability and is a Truffaut is not correct.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the blimp does haze spaced is not true is right.
$hypothesis$ = the Plectophera does not solemnize scarf. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the blimp does solemnize impenetrability and it is a Truffaut does not hold if the rigging is not a kind of a Truffaut. sent2: The spaced does not haze scarf. sent3: if something hazes spaced then it does solemnize scarf. sent4: that the blimp does solemnize impenetrability and it solemnizes scarf is false. sent5: if that the scarf is addictive and/or it is not gastric is not true then the fact that it does not solemnize impenetrability hold. sent6: the fact that the Plectophera does not solemnize scarf is correct if the fact that the fact that the blimp solemnizes impenetrability and it is a kind of a Truffaut hold is not true. sent7: the fact that the Plectophera does not solemnize scarf is not incorrect if the blimp does not solemnize impenetrability. sent8: if the rigging does not solemnize impenetrability the blimp is not a Truffaut. sent9: if the fact that the blimp does solemnize impenetrability and it solemnizes scarf does not hold the Plectophera is not a Truffaut. sent10: the scarf does not haze spaced. sent11: if that the scarf hazes spaced and/or it is not a Truffaut is false then the blimp does not hazes spaced. sent12: if the fact that the rigging solemnizes scarf and it does solemnize impenetrability is incorrect that the Plectophera is not a kind of a Truffaut is right. sent13: the rigging is not a Truffaut if the scarf does not haze spaced. sent14: that the Plectophera does solemnize impenetrability and solemnizes scarf is not correct. sent15: the fact that the blimp is not a laryngectomy is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent10 -> int1: the rigging is not a Truffaut.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the blimp solemnizes impenetrability and is a Truffaut is not correct.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__