there is something such that if it is not technological the fact that it does not rate and is a flimsiness does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the ginger is not a trifurcation but a Spalacidae is not correct if it is not an impossible. sent2: if the orderly is not Tasmanian that it is not a Meccano and it is a kind of a flimsiness is false. sent3: there is something such that if it is not technological then the fact that it is a kind of a rates that is a flimsiness does not hold. sent4: if something does not cope trial then the fact that it is not technological and it is afraid is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if that it does not predominate is not false the fact that it is not mayoral and it is a capitalization is incorrect. sent6: if the ginger is not a leaven the fact that it is not a kind of a rates and it is a loneliness is not right. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not program internet then that it does not cope duffer and it does lurch Sacco does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Panamanian that it is not a ringmaster and it is a Sicilian does not hold. sent9: if the ginger is not technological then the fact that it is not a rates and it is a flimsiness is not true. sent10: there is something such that if it is not supernal then that it does not carol monasticism and it is informational is not true. sent11: there is something such that if it is technological the fact that it is not a kind of a rates and it is a flimsiness does not hold. sent12: if the vaccinee is not technological then that it is not rich and it is a glide is not correct. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not technological then it is not a rates but a flimsiness. sent14: the fact that the ginger is a kind of a rates that is a flimsiness is not correct if it is not technological. sent15: if the inhibitor is not mindful then that it does not cope pseudohermaphrodite and it does inspire is incorrect. sent16: there is something such that if it is not unsociable the fact that it is not ethnological and is a breakwater is false. sent17: if the ginger is not technological then it does not rate and it is a flimsiness. sent18: the fact that there is something such that if it is not anal then that it is not a Sicilian and does carol Honegger is not true is correct. sent19: if something does not carol panther then that it is not a kind of a unconventionality and it is technological is not correct. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a loneliness that it is not a jargoon and is a bulk is not true. sent21: if the fact that the ginger is technological is not wrong then that it is not a rates but a flimsiness is wrong.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the ginger is not technological and is afraid is not true if it does not cope trial.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not technological the fact that it does not rate and is a flimsiness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ginger is not a trifurcation but a Spalacidae is not correct if it is not an impossible. sent2: if the orderly is not Tasmanian that it is not a Meccano and it is a kind of a flimsiness is false. sent3: there is something such that if it is not technological then the fact that it is a kind of a rates that is a flimsiness does not hold. sent4: if something does not cope trial then the fact that it is not technological and it is afraid is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if that it does not predominate is not false the fact that it is not mayoral and it is a capitalization is incorrect. sent6: if the ginger is not a leaven the fact that it is not a kind of a rates and it is a loneliness is not right. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not program internet then that it does not cope duffer and it does lurch Sacco does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Panamanian that it is not a ringmaster and it is a Sicilian does not hold. sent9: if the ginger is not technological then the fact that it is not a rates and it is a flimsiness is not true. sent10: there is something such that if it is not supernal then that it does not carol monasticism and it is informational is not true. sent11: there is something such that if it is technological the fact that it is not a kind of a rates and it is a flimsiness does not hold. sent12: if the vaccinee is not technological then that it is not rich and it is a glide is not correct. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not technological then it is not a rates but a flimsiness. sent14: the fact that the ginger is a kind of a rates that is a flimsiness is not correct if it is not technological. sent15: if the inhibitor is not mindful then that it does not cope pseudohermaphrodite and it does inspire is incorrect. sent16: there is something such that if it is not unsociable the fact that it is not ethnological and is a breakwater is false. sent17: if the ginger is not technological then it does not rate and it is a flimsiness. sent18: the fact that there is something such that if it is not anal then that it is not a Sicilian and does carol Honegger is not true is correct. sent19: if something does not carol panther then that it is not a kind of a unconventionality and it is technological is not correct. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a loneliness that it is not a jargoon and is a bulk is not true. sent21: if the fact that the ginger is technological is not wrong then that it is not a rates but a flimsiness is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__