there is something such that if it does not price wallboard that it is postbiblical and not a twins is not true.
sent1: the fact that the fact that something is Gambian but it is not a franc is true is not true if it is not agronomic. sent2: the fact that the harbor is postbiblical and is not a twins is false if it does not price wallboard. sent3: if the harbor does not price wallboard then it is a kind of postbiblical thing that is not a twins. sent4: there is something such that if it is a capability then that it does price Haredi and is not a by-and-by does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not price wallboard then that it is both postbiblical and a twins is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a obolus then it does exclude surprised and is not a Pica. sent7: there is something such that if it is a capability then that it is a joint and it is not a chill is not correct.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not agronomic then the fact that it is a Gambian and it is not a franc does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: if the lighterman is not agronomic the fact that it is a Gambian and it is not a franc is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not price wallboard that it is postbiblical and not a twins is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that something is Gambian but it is not a franc is true is not true if it is not agronomic. sent2: the fact that the harbor is postbiblical and is not a twins is false if it does not price wallboard. sent3: if the harbor does not price wallboard then it is a kind of postbiblical thing that is not a twins. sent4: there is something such that if it is a capability then that it does price Haredi and is not a by-and-by does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not price wallboard then that it is both postbiblical and a twins is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a obolus then it does exclude surprised and is not a Pica. sent7: there is something such that if it is a capability then that it is a joint and it is not a chill is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__