that the fact that the wagtail does aggrieve and does bypass Varanidae is not true if the ratter is not humane is not right.
sent1: the fact that the infielder is not humane is not wrong. sent2: if that the ratter is a kind of a lemongrass and it does bypass Varanidae is not right the wagtail does not bypass Varanidae. sent3: if the fact that the ratter aggrieves hold it is humane. sent4: if the ratter is inhumane the wagtail is inhumane and does bypass Varanidae. sent5: the wagtail does not twine arachnophobia. sent6: if that the ratter does not aggrieve hold the wagtail does aggrieve and it bypasses Varanidae. sent7: the wagtail is a Dardanus and does aggrieve. sent8: if the wagtail is not astomatal the ratter does not bypass Varanidae but it is a kind of a lemongrass. sent9: the wagtail does aggrieve and it is humane if the ratter does not aggrieve. sent10: the fact that the wagtail aggrieves and it bypasses Varanidae is not true if that the ratter does not aggrieves hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ratter does aggrieve.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the ratter is humane.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ratter is not humane.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the ratter does not aggrieve.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: that the wagtail does aggrieve and does bypass Varanidae is not true.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the wagtail is humane.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the wagtail does aggrieve and does bypass Varanidae is not true if the ratter is not humane is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the infielder is not humane is not wrong. sent2: if that the ratter is a kind of a lemongrass and it does bypass Varanidae is not right the wagtail does not bypass Varanidae. sent3: if the fact that the ratter aggrieves hold it is humane. sent4: if the ratter is inhumane the wagtail is inhumane and does bypass Varanidae. sent5: the wagtail does not twine arachnophobia. sent6: if that the ratter does not aggrieve hold the wagtail does aggrieve and it bypasses Varanidae. sent7: the wagtail is a Dardanus and does aggrieve. sent8: if the wagtail is not astomatal the ratter does not bypass Varanidae but it is a kind of a lemongrass. sent9: the wagtail does aggrieve and it is humane if the ratter does not aggrieve. sent10: the fact that the wagtail aggrieves and it bypasses Varanidae is not true if that the ratter does not aggrieves hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ratter does aggrieve.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the ratter is humane.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ratter is not humane.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the ratter does not aggrieve.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: that the wagtail does aggrieve and does bypass Varanidae is not true.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__