the idealizing occurs.
sent1: the resizing grunt occurs and the postmillennialness happens. sent2: that the ungrammaticalness does not occur and the hidroticness does not occur triggers the sneering Safar. sent3: if the pubicness does not occur or the subvention does not occur or both the sneering parchment occurs. sent4: if both the sneering Safar and the pubicness occurs then that the resizing grunt does not occur is correct. sent5: if the sneering parchment happens the idealizing occurs. sent6: the ungrammaticalness does not occur and the hidroticness does not occur.
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the sneering Safar occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pubicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sneering Safar occurs and the pubicness occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the resizing grunt does not occur.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the resizing grunt occurs is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the pubicness does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the pubicness does not occur or the subvention does not occur or both.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the sneering parchment happens.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the idealizing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the resizing grunt occurs and the postmillennialness happens. sent2: that the ungrammaticalness does not occur and the hidroticness does not occur triggers the sneering Safar. sent3: if the pubicness does not occur or the subvention does not occur or both the sneering parchment occurs. sent4: if both the sneering Safar and the pubicness occurs then that the resizing grunt does not occur is correct. sent5: if the sneering parchment happens the idealizing occurs. sent6: the ungrammaticalness does not occur and the hidroticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the sneering Safar occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pubicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sneering Safar occurs and the pubicness occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the resizing grunt does not occur.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the resizing grunt occurs is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the pubicness does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the pubicness does not occur or the subvention does not occur or both.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the sneering parchment happens.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__