the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a representative and it is not a kind of a neurobiologist it is a cheroot is false.
sent1: if something that is not a representative is a neurobiologist it is a cheroot. sent2: if something that is not a lysogeny is not bimodal then it is paleocortical. sent3: if something that is not a shelduck does not embody it is cytogenetic. sent4: a non-representative thing that is not a kind of a dashboard is not nonpolitical. sent5: the instrumentation is a kind of a cheroot if it is a kind of a representative and it is not a kind of a neurobiologist. sent6: if something is not a Tagore and it is not a kind of a Oniscidae it is scorbutic. sent7: that the instrumentation is a cheroot is correct if it is not a representative and it is a kind of a neurobiologist. sent8: there exists something such that if it is representative and is not a kind of a neurobiologist it is a kind of a cheroot. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not orthopedics and it is not a kind of a perfusion then it deserves instrumentation. sent10: that something is a kind of a cheroot is not wrong if it is representative and it is not a neurobiologist. sent11: there exists something such that if it is both not a representative and a neurobiologist then it is a kind of a cheroot. sent12: if something that is not a representative is not a kind of a neurobiologist it is a cheroot.
sent12 -> int1: if the instrumentation is nonrepresentative and it is not a neurobiologist then it is a kind of a cheroot.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sofa is nonpolitical is true if it is nonrepresentative and it is not a kind of a dashboard.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a representative and it is not a kind of a neurobiologist it is a cheroot is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a representative is a neurobiologist it is a cheroot. sent2: if something that is not a lysogeny is not bimodal then it is paleocortical. sent3: if something that is not a shelduck does not embody it is cytogenetic. sent4: a non-representative thing that is not a kind of a dashboard is not nonpolitical. sent5: the instrumentation is a kind of a cheroot if it is a kind of a representative and it is not a kind of a neurobiologist. sent6: if something is not a Tagore and it is not a kind of a Oniscidae it is scorbutic. sent7: that the instrumentation is a cheroot is correct if it is not a representative and it is a kind of a neurobiologist. sent8: there exists something such that if it is representative and is not a kind of a neurobiologist it is a kind of a cheroot. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not orthopedics and it is not a kind of a perfusion then it deserves instrumentation. sent10: that something is a kind of a cheroot is not wrong if it is representative and it is not a neurobiologist. sent11: there exists something such that if it is both not a representative and a neurobiologist then it is a kind of a cheroot. sent12: if something that is not a representative is not a kind of a neurobiologist it is a cheroot. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the instrumentation is nonrepresentative and it is not a neurobiologist then it is a kind of a cheroot.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__