the additiveness occurs.
sent1: if the charming Parus happens not the awakening but the occurring occurs. sent2: if the charming naloxone does not occur the corrugation happens and the leaflessness occurs. sent3: that either the charming Parus does not occur or the corrugation does not occur or both does not hold if that the ricing fellowship does not occur is true. sent4: if the leaflessness occurs then the occurring occurs. sent5: if the fact that the ricing fellowship does not occur and the anonymousness does not occur does not hold the anonymousness happens. sent6: that the additive but not the charming Parus occurs does not hold if the corrugation happens. sent7: the leaflessness occurs. sent8: the occurring is prevented by that the awakening occurs and/or that the ricing fellowship happens. sent9: the fact that the ricing fellowship does not occur and the anonymousness does not occur is not correct if the awakening does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the charming Parus does not occur and/or the corrugation does not occur is false the additiveness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ricing fellowship occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the awakening or the ricing fellowship or both occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the occurring does not occur.; sent4 & sent7 -> int3: the occurring happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the ricing fellowship does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the charming Parus does not occur or the corrugation does not occur or both is wrong hold.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the anonymousness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the additiveness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the charming Parus happens not the awakening but the occurring occurs. sent2: if the charming naloxone does not occur the corrugation happens and the leaflessness occurs. sent3: that either the charming Parus does not occur or the corrugation does not occur or both does not hold if that the ricing fellowship does not occur is true. sent4: if the leaflessness occurs then the occurring occurs. sent5: if the fact that the ricing fellowship does not occur and the anonymousness does not occur does not hold the anonymousness happens. sent6: that the additive but not the charming Parus occurs does not hold if the corrugation happens. sent7: the leaflessness occurs. sent8: the occurring is prevented by that the awakening occurs and/or that the ricing fellowship happens. sent9: the fact that the ricing fellowship does not occur and the anonymousness does not occur is not correct if the awakening does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the charming Parus does not occur and/or the corrugation does not occur is false the additiveness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ricing fellowship occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the awakening or the ricing fellowship or both occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the occurring does not occur.; sent4 & sent7 -> int3: the occurring happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the ricing fellowship does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the charming Parus does not occur or the corrugation does not occur or both is wrong hold.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__