that both the Tobagonian and the non-cursorialness happens is not right.
sent1: the fact that both the Tobagonianness and the cursorialness happens is wrong. sent2: the puncturing results in that the wearing blemished does not occur and the identifying tidiness does not occur. sent3: if the raping happens then the unintelligibleness happens. sent4: the fact that both the Tobagonian and the cursorialness occurs is not correct if the unintelligibleness occurs. sent5: the stemming does not occur and the astringing minority does not occur. sent6: both the sanction and the piraticalness occurs. sent7: that the identifying Agee occurs or that the apposition occurs or both is triggered by that the astringing minority does not occur. sent8: if the autotrophicness happens then the fact that that the unintelligibleness does not occur and the identifying shopfront does not occur is not incorrect does not hold. sent9: the astringing rheology occurs if the fainting happens. sent10: if the fact that the unintelligibleness does not occur and the identifying shopfront does not occur is not correct the cursorialness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the identifying tidiness occurs hold. sent12: if the unintelligibleness occurs the fact that the Tobagonian occurs but the cursorialness does not occur does not hold. sent13: that the identifying tidiness does not occur causes that the Tobagonian and the raping occurs. sent14: the identifying brand-newness occurs. sent15: the puncturing occurs if the fact that the identifying Agee occurs is not false.
the Tobagonian but not the cursorialness occurs.
sent5 -> int1: the astringing minority does not occur.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the identifying Agee happens and/or the apposition happens.;
$hypothesis$ = that both the Tobagonian and the non-cursorialness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the Tobagonianness and the cursorialness happens is wrong. sent2: the puncturing results in that the wearing blemished does not occur and the identifying tidiness does not occur. sent3: if the raping happens then the unintelligibleness happens. sent4: the fact that both the Tobagonian and the cursorialness occurs is not correct if the unintelligibleness occurs. sent5: the stemming does not occur and the astringing minority does not occur. sent6: both the sanction and the piraticalness occurs. sent7: that the identifying Agee occurs or that the apposition occurs or both is triggered by that the astringing minority does not occur. sent8: if the autotrophicness happens then the fact that that the unintelligibleness does not occur and the identifying shopfront does not occur is not incorrect does not hold. sent9: the astringing rheology occurs if the fainting happens. sent10: if the fact that the unintelligibleness does not occur and the identifying shopfront does not occur is not correct the cursorialness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the identifying tidiness occurs hold. sent12: if the unintelligibleness occurs the fact that the Tobagonian occurs but the cursorialness does not occur does not hold. sent13: that the identifying tidiness does not occur causes that the Tobagonian and the raping occurs. sent14: the identifying brand-newness occurs. sent15: the puncturing occurs if the fact that the identifying Agee occurs is not false. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__