that that there exists something such that if it does not besot Temujin and subrogates putout then it is non-capitalistic is not wrong is false.
sent1: something is not Lusitanian if it is not a clock and is capitalistic. sent2: there is something such that if it does not besot Temujin and it subrogates putout then it is capitalistic. sent3: if something is a bay that is a kind of a Boethius it is not a kind of a Seneca. sent4: if the electrotherapist is a kind of non-syntactic thing that does subrogate putout then it does not lysogenize thwack. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not colonial and it is reputable then it is not incalculable. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Boethius and does lysogenize electrotherapist it does not besot grouping. sent7: something that does not besot Temujin and does subrogate putout is capitalistic. sent8: if something does not besot Temujin and does subrogate putout it is not capitalistic. sent9: there exists something such that if it does subrogate glamorization and it is cold then it does not lysogenize abandonment.
sent8 -> int1: if the electrotherapist does not besot Temujin but it does subrogate putout it is not capitalistic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the angioscope is not a clock but capitalistic that it is non-Lusitanian is not wrong.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that there exists something such that if it does not besot Temujin and subrogates putout then it is non-capitalistic is not wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not Lusitanian if it is not a clock and is capitalistic. sent2: there is something such that if it does not besot Temujin and it subrogates putout then it is capitalistic. sent3: if something is a bay that is a kind of a Boethius it is not a kind of a Seneca. sent4: if the electrotherapist is a kind of non-syntactic thing that does subrogate putout then it does not lysogenize thwack. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not colonial and it is reputable then it is not incalculable. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Boethius and does lysogenize electrotherapist it does not besot grouping. sent7: something that does not besot Temujin and does subrogate putout is capitalistic. sent8: if something does not besot Temujin and does subrogate putout it is not capitalistic. sent9: there exists something such that if it does subrogate glamorization and it is cold then it does not lysogenize abandonment. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the electrotherapist does not besot Temujin but it does subrogate putout it is not capitalistic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__