that the flap does bask abohm is correct.
sent1: there is nothing such that it does not deplore President and it is a Bulnesia. sent2: if the bourbon does not bask bourbon the gum is a raper but it does not bask bourbon. sent3: the flap basks abohm if the bourbon is undatable. sent4: the bourbon is undatable if the fact that it does not bask perjurer and it does not impair Haman is not right. sent5: if something that does not bask perjurer does not impair Haman it does not bask bourbon. sent6: the President does not deplore President if the gum is a raper and does not bask bourbon. sent7: that the President does deplore President is not false if that the Burgundy does not deplore President and is a Bulnesia does not hold.
sent5 -> int1: the bourbon does not bask bourbon if it does not bask perjurer and does not impair Haman.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bourbon does not bask perjurer and does not impair Haman.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bourbon does not bask bourbon.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the gum is a kind of a raper and does not bask bourbon.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the President does not deplore President.; sent1 -> int5: that the Burgundy does not deplore President but it is a kind of a Bulnesia is not correct.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the President deplores President.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the bourbon does not bask perjurer and does not impair Haman is incorrect.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the bourbon is undatable.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the flap does bask abohm is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that it does not deplore President and it is a Bulnesia. sent2: if the bourbon does not bask bourbon the gum is a raper but it does not bask bourbon. sent3: the flap basks abohm if the bourbon is undatable. sent4: the bourbon is undatable if the fact that it does not bask perjurer and it does not impair Haman is not right. sent5: if something that does not bask perjurer does not impair Haman it does not bask bourbon. sent6: the President does not deplore President if the gum is a raper and does not bask bourbon. sent7: that the President does deplore President is not false if that the Burgundy does not deplore President and is a Bulnesia does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the bourbon does not bask bourbon if it does not bask perjurer and does not impair Haman.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bourbon does not bask perjurer and does not impair Haman.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bourbon does not bask bourbon.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the gum is a kind of a raper and does not bask bourbon.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the President does not deplore President.; sent1 -> int5: that the Burgundy does not deplore President but it is a kind of a Bulnesia is not correct.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the President deplores President.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the bourbon does not bask perjurer and does not impair Haman is incorrect.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the bourbon is undatable.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__