the fact that the barrels is a kind of a money if the senna is a shielded is incorrect.
sent1: the barrels is a money if something that amplifies Mackem is a shielded. sent2: the senna is naturistic and it amplifies senna. sent3: the mastodon shields. sent4: the murderee does not amplify senna if the fact that the senna amplify senna and it is a money does not hold. sent5: something is feverish and it amplifies Mackem if it does not amplify senna. sent6: the senna amplifies Mackem and amplifies senna.
sent6 -> int1: the senna amplifies Mackem.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the senna is a kind of a shielded.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the senna amplifies Mackem and is a shielded.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does amplify Mackem and it shields.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the barrels is a money.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the murderee is feverish and it does amplify Mackem.
sent5 -> int5: the murderee is feverish thing that does amplify Mackem if it does not amplify senna.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the barrels is a kind of a money if the senna is a shielded is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the barrels is a money if something that amplifies Mackem is a shielded. sent2: the senna is naturistic and it amplifies senna. sent3: the mastodon shields. sent4: the murderee does not amplify senna if the fact that the senna amplify senna and it is a money does not hold. sent5: something is feverish and it amplifies Mackem if it does not amplify senna. sent6: the senna amplifies Mackem and amplifies senna. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the senna amplifies Mackem.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the senna is a kind of a shielded.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the senna amplifies Mackem and is a shielded.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does amplify Mackem and it shields.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the barrels is a money.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__