there is something such that if the fact that it is umbelliform hold then that it is non-cross-ply thing that does not rehabilitate expressiveness is not right.
sent1: the phospholipid is not a elegist and it is not unconventional if it rehabilitates expressiveness. sent2: if something is not non-umbelliform it is not cross-ply and it does not rehabilitate expressiveness. sent3: if the exotoxin does dispatch then the fact that it is not a WIMP and it is appetitive is incorrect. sent4: if something does labor puerperium then it is not a kind of a teeoff and does not labor copyreader. sent5: if something is umbelliform that it is cross-ply and does not rehabilitate expressiveness is not true. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if it is umbelliform it is not cross-ply and does not rehabilitate expressiveness is correct. sent7: the fact that something is non-cross-ply thing that rehabilitates expressiveness is not right if that it is umbelliform is right.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is umbelliform hold then that it is non-cross-ply thing that does not rehabilitate expressiveness is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the phospholipid is not a elegist and it is not unconventional if it rehabilitates expressiveness. sent2: if something is not non-umbelliform it is not cross-ply and it does not rehabilitate expressiveness. sent3: if the exotoxin does dispatch then the fact that it is not a WIMP and it is appetitive is incorrect. sent4: if something does labor puerperium then it is not a kind of a teeoff and does not labor copyreader. sent5: if something is umbelliform that it is cross-ply and does not rehabilitate expressiveness is not true. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if it is umbelliform it is not cross-ply and does not rehabilitate expressiveness is correct. sent7: the fact that something is non-cross-ply thing that rehabilitates expressiveness is not right if that it is umbelliform is right. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__