that something does confront and is a Gossypium is false.
sent1: the fact that something is a Gossypium is right. sent2: if something is not covalent then that it is a kind of a ranch and it is not gastrointestinal does not hold. sent3: something does not splutter if it does not ding fissure. sent4: that that something dings fissure and is not glossopharyngeal is not true if it is not a kind of a heel is not false. sent5: that the scaphopod is gastrointestinal hold. sent6: if the fact that something does ding fissure and is non-glossopharyngeal is wrong then it does not splutter. sent7: the scaphopod splutters and is internal if it is not covalent. sent8: the scaphopod is not a heel if that the orangeade is a ranch but it is not a Acapulco is not correct. sent9: if the scaphopod is gastrointestinal it is not covalent. sent10: the fact that that that the orangeade is a ranch but it is not a kind of a Acapulco hold is not right is not incorrect if the fact that the mimosa does not confront is true. sent11: if that the scaphopod is not covalent hold then it is internal. sent12: the fact that the scaphopod confronts but it is not internal is not correct if the mimosa does not heel. sent13: the mimosa is not a ranch if it is a kind of a Gossypium. sent14: the scaphopod is internal. sent15: the orangeade is not a kind of a Acapulco if the fact that it confronts and is not internal is incorrect. sent16: the scaphopod is not a kind of a heel if the orangeade is a Acapulco. sent17: the mimosa is a Gossypium.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mimosa does not confront.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the orangeade is a ranch but it is not a Acapulco is not true.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the scaphopod is not a heel.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the scaphopod dings fissure and is not glossopharyngeal does not hold if it is not a heel.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the scaphopod dings fissure and is not glossopharyngeal is not right.; sent6 -> int5: if that the scaphopod dings fissure but it is not glossopharyngeal is not true it does not splutter.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the scaphopod does not splutter.; sent9 & sent5 -> int7: that the scaphopod is not covalent is not incorrect.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the scaphopod does splutter and is internal.; int8 -> int9: the scaphopod does splutter.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the mimosa does confront.; int11 & sent17 -> int12: that the mimosa confronts and it is a Gossypium hold.; int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that something does confront and is a Gossypium is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a Gossypium is right. sent2: if something is not covalent then that it is a kind of a ranch and it is not gastrointestinal does not hold. sent3: something does not splutter if it does not ding fissure. sent4: that that something dings fissure and is not glossopharyngeal is not true if it is not a kind of a heel is not false. sent5: that the scaphopod is gastrointestinal hold. sent6: if the fact that something does ding fissure and is non-glossopharyngeal is wrong then it does not splutter. sent7: the scaphopod splutters and is internal if it is not covalent. sent8: the scaphopod is not a heel if that the orangeade is a ranch but it is not a Acapulco is not correct. sent9: if the scaphopod is gastrointestinal it is not covalent. sent10: the fact that that that the orangeade is a ranch but it is not a kind of a Acapulco hold is not right is not incorrect if the fact that the mimosa does not confront is true. sent11: if that the scaphopod is not covalent hold then it is internal. sent12: the fact that the scaphopod confronts but it is not internal is not correct if the mimosa does not heel. sent13: the mimosa is not a ranch if it is a kind of a Gossypium. sent14: the scaphopod is internal. sent15: the orangeade is not a kind of a Acapulco if the fact that it confronts and is not internal is incorrect. sent16: the scaphopod is not a kind of a heel if the orangeade is a Acapulco. sent17: the mimosa is a Gossypium. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mimosa does not confront.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the orangeade is a ranch but it is not a Acapulco is not true.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the scaphopod is not a heel.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the scaphopod dings fissure and is not glossopharyngeal does not hold if it is not a heel.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the scaphopod dings fissure and is not glossopharyngeal is not right.; sent6 -> int5: if that the scaphopod dings fissure but it is not glossopharyngeal is not true it does not splutter.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the scaphopod does not splutter.; sent9 & sent5 -> int7: that the scaphopod is not covalent is not incorrect.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the scaphopod does splutter and is internal.; int8 -> int9: the scaphopod does splutter.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the mimosa does confront.; int11 & sent17 -> int12: that the mimosa confronts and it is a Gossypium hold.; int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__