if the dickey is not a kind of a dais the fact that the backplate is not a Ocimum and does inflate guereza is wrong.
sent1: the dickey is a kind of a foot if the backplate is not a kind of a Ocimum but it does inflate guereza. sent2: the guanaco is a dais. sent3: if the dickey overturns seawater then the fact that it is not a disposal and/or is antisatellite is incorrect. sent4: the guereza is not a dais. sent5: the fact that the haulm is a kind of a Wallenstein is not incorrect if that it is not a timid or it foots or both does not hold. sent6: that something is non-parental or it is scurfy or both is not right if it does foot. sent7: if the fact that something is not parental and/or is scurfy is not correct it is a kind of a dais. sent8: the wagoner does not inflate guereza. sent9: the dickey wraps.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backplate is not a kind of a Ocimum and does inflate guereza.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the dickey foots.; sent6 -> int2: if the dickey is a kind of a foot then the fact that it is not parental or not non-scurfy or both is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the dickey is not parental or it is scurfy or both is wrong.; sent7 -> int4: if that the dickey is not parental and/or it is scurfy is not correct then it is a dais.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the dickey is a dais is right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dickey is not a dais.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the backplate is not a Ocimum but it inflates guereza is not true.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the dickey does not overturn gamble or it is a Himantoglossum or both does not hold.
sent4 -> int8: something is not a dais.;
$hypothesis$ = if the dickey is not a kind of a dais the fact that the backplate is not a Ocimum and does inflate guereza is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the dickey is a kind of a foot if the backplate is not a kind of a Ocimum but it does inflate guereza. sent2: the guanaco is a dais. sent3: if the dickey overturns seawater then the fact that it is not a disposal and/or is antisatellite is incorrect. sent4: the guereza is not a dais. sent5: the fact that the haulm is a kind of a Wallenstein is not incorrect if that it is not a timid or it foots or both does not hold. sent6: that something is non-parental or it is scurfy or both is not right if it does foot. sent7: if the fact that something is not parental and/or is scurfy is not correct it is a kind of a dais. sent8: the wagoner does not inflate guereza. sent9: the dickey wraps. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backplate is not a kind of a Ocimum and does inflate guereza.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the dickey foots.; sent6 -> int2: if the dickey is a kind of a foot then the fact that it is not parental or not non-scurfy or both is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the dickey is not parental or it is scurfy or both is wrong.; sent7 -> int4: if that the dickey is not parental and/or it is scurfy is not correct then it is a dais.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the dickey is a dais is right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dickey is not a dais.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the backplate is not a Ocimum but it inflates guereza is not true.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__