the cicerone is healthful.
sent1: something is a numerology if it is coeliac. sent2: the cicerone is horse-drawn. sent3: the cicerone does destain newspeak. sent4: the focalization does not sound choppiness. sent5: the fact that the focalization does destain newspeak or it does not muff boustrophedon or both is not right. sent6: the fact that the canecutter is coeliac and/or it does not sound one-liner does not hold. sent7: the Mendelian is healthful. sent8: the focalization does muff boustrophedon if the fact that the Mendelian does not muff boustrophedon but it is a kind of a hippodrome is not incorrect. sent9: if the Mendelian does not muff boustrophedon the focalization is a hippodrome and does not destain newspeak. sent10: if something condoles it either is not a hippodrome or does not destain newspeak or both. sent11: if the focalization condoles the cicerone is a numerology. sent12: the focalization does not destain newspeak if the Mendelian does not muff boustrophedon. sent13: the novel destains newspeak. sent14: the cicerone does not muff boustrophedon if the fact that that the Mendelian is a kind of a numerology or does muff boustrophedon or both is wrong hold. sent15: if the Mendelian does muff boustrophedon the novel sounds one-liner. sent16: the cicerone is not healthful if the fact that the Mendelian does not sound one-liner and/or does not muff boustrophedon is incorrect. sent17: the Mendelian does not condole if the novel is not healthful or is a numerology or both. sent18: the fact that the fact that either something does not sound one-liner or it does not muff boustrophedon or both hold does not hold if it is not a kind of a hippodrome. sent19: that the stearin is healthful and/or is not a contrariety is incorrect. sent20: the fact that the Mendelian does muff Judah is not wrong. sent21: that if the focalization is a kind of the hippodrome that does not destain newspeak then the focalization condoles is true. sent22: the novel does not sound one-liner if the fact that the canecutter is coeliac or does not sound one-liner or both is not correct. sent23: if something is a numerology the fact that it is healthful hold. sent24: the focalization does not destain newspeak. sent25: the focalization is coeliac if it is a clear. sent26: if the focalization does not sound choppiness it does clear and it is not invulnerable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Mendelian does muff boustrophedon is not wrong.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the novel sounds one-liner.; sent22 & sent6 -> int2: the novel does not sound one-liner.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Mendelian does not muff boustrophedon.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the focalization is a kind of a hippodrome and does not destain newspeak.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the focalization condoles.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the cicerone is a numerology.; sent23 -> int8: the cicerone is not unhealthful if it is a kind of a numerology.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the cicerone is not healthful.
sent18 -> int9: the fact that the Mendelian does not sound one-liner or it does not muff boustrophedon or both is wrong if it is not a hippodrome.; sent10 -> int10: the novel is not a hippodrome or does not destain newspeak or both if it condoles.; sent1 -> int11: the focalization is a numerology if it is coeliac.; sent26 & sent4 -> int12: the focalization is a kind of a clear and is vulnerable.; int12 -> int13: the focalization is a kind of a clear.; sent25 & int13 -> int14: the focalization is coeliac.; int11 & int14 -> int15: the focalization is a numerology.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is a numerology.;
$hypothesis$ = the cicerone is healthful. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a numerology if it is coeliac. sent2: the cicerone is horse-drawn. sent3: the cicerone does destain newspeak. sent4: the focalization does not sound choppiness. sent5: the fact that the focalization does destain newspeak or it does not muff boustrophedon or both is not right. sent6: the fact that the canecutter is coeliac and/or it does not sound one-liner does not hold. sent7: the Mendelian is healthful. sent8: the focalization does muff boustrophedon if the fact that the Mendelian does not muff boustrophedon but it is a kind of a hippodrome is not incorrect. sent9: if the Mendelian does not muff boustrophedon the focalization is a hippodrome and does not destain newspeak. sent10: if something condoles it either is not a hippodrome or does not destain newspeak or both. sent11: if the focalization condoles the cicerone is a numerology. sent12: the focalization does not destain newspeak if the Mendelian does not muff boustrophedon. sent13: the novel destains newspeak. sent14: the cicerone does not muff boustrophedon if the fact that that the Mendelian is a kind of a numerology or does muff boustrophedon or both is wrong hold. sent15: if the Mendelian does muff boustrophedon the novel sounds one-liner. sent16: the cicerone is not healthful if the fact that the Mendelian does not sound one-liner and/or does not muff boustrophedon is incorrect. sent17: the Mendelian does not condole if the novel is not healthful or is a numerology or both. sent18: the fact that the fact that either something does not sound one-liner or it does not muff boustrophedon or both hold does not hold if it is not a kind of a hippodrome. sent19: that the stearin is healthful and/or is not a contrariety is incorrect. sent20: the fact that the Mendelian does muff Judah is not wrong. sent21: that if the focalization is a kind of the hippodrome that does not destain newspeak then the focalization condoles is true. sent22: the novel does not sound one-liner if the fact that the canecutter is coeliac or does not sound one-liner or both is not correct. sent23: if something is a numerology the fact that it is healthful hold. sent24: the focalization does not destain newspeak. sent25: the focalization is coeliac if it is a clear. sent26: if the focalization does not sound choppiness it does clear and it is not invulnerable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Mendelian does muff boustrophedon is not wrong.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the novel sounds one-liner.; sent22 & sent6 -> int2: the novel does not sound one-liner.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Mendelian does not muff boustrophedon.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the focalization is a kind of a hippodrome and does not destain newspeak.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the focalization condoles.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the cicerone is a numerology.; sent23 -> int8: the cicerone is not unhealthful if it is a kind of a numerology.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__