the fact that there is something such that if it does not skank that it is not a boast and is a kind of a GCSE is wrong hold.
sent1: the fact that that the timucu is a kind of uncousinly thing that is a GCSE hold does not hold if that it does not correspond determinateness is not wrong. sent2: the fact that something is a boast and a GCSE is not right if the fact that it does not skank is correct. sent3: if the interviewee does not divert the fact that it is not a kind of a tailcoat and does avoid antimatter is incorrect. sent4: the fact that something does not treble but it is not non-nominalistic is incorrect if it does not skank. sent5: if something does not skank it is not a kind of a boast and it is a GCSE. sent6: the fact that if the timucu does not skank then that the timucu is both a boast and a GCSE does not hold is correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a skank then that it is a kind of a boast that is a kind of a GCSE is false. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a skank the fact that it does not boast and it is a GCSE is incorrect. sent9: that something is both not a boast and a GCSE is not true if it does skank. sent10: if the timucu skanks then the fact that it is not a boast but a GCSE is wrong. sent11: the fact that something is not papillate but it is a kind of a phasianid is not true if it is not avitaminotic. sent12: the timucu is not a boast but it is a GCSE if it does not skank. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not skank then it is not a kind of a boast and it is a GCSE. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a particularization that it does not antisepticize outrage and it is a vinifera does not hold.
that the Chihuahua does not treble and is nominalistic is not correct if it does not skank.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not skank that it is not a boast and is a kind of a GCSE is wrong hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the timucu is a kind of uncousinly thing that is a GCSE hold does not hold if that it does not correspond determinateness is not wrong. sent2: the fact that something is a boast and a GCSE is not right if the fact that it does not skank is correct. sent3: if the interviewee does not divert the fact that it is not a kind of a tailcoat and does avoid antimatter is incorrect. sent4: the fact that something does not treble but it is not non-nominalistic is incorrect if it does not skank. sent5: if something does not skank it is not a kind of a boast and it is a GCSE. sent6: the fact that if the timucu does not skank then that the timucu is both a boast and a GCSE does not hold is correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a skank then that it is a kind of a boast that is a kind of a GCSE is false. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a skank the fact that it does not boast and it is a GCSE is incorrect. sent9: that something is both not a boast and a GCSE is not true if it does skank. sent10: if the timucu skanks then the fact that it is not a boast but a GCSE is wrong. sent11: the fact that something is not papillate but it is a kind of a phasianid is not true if it is not avitaminotic. sent12: the timucu is not a boast but it is a GCSE if it does not skank. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not skank then it is not a kind of a boast and it is a GCSE. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a particularization that it does not antisepticize outrage and it is a vinifera does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__