the W is not diametric but it is a kind of a yield.
sent1: the driftwood is diametric. sent2: there exists something such that it crooks avatar. sent3: something is a tramontane and does crook avatar. sent4: if the driftwood is a sesquipedality then that the W is not a kind of a Orectolobidae and yields is incorrect. sent5: if the driftwood does not contradistinguish mysticism then it is a Orectolobidae. sent6: that the driftwood does not contradistinguish mysticism and is a kind of a yield is not correct if the W is diametric. sent7: if the W is not a Orectolobidae it is diametric thing that does contradistinguish mysticism. sent8: the driftwood does not contradistinguish mysticism if there exists something such that it is tramontane and does crook avatar. sent9: that the W is diametric and it yields is false. sent10: that the W is diametric thing that yields is not right if the driftwood is a sesquipedality. sent11: if something does not contradistinguish mysticism then it is a sesquipedality and it is a Orectolobidae. sent12: if something does not contradistinguish mysticism it is a Orectolobidae. sent13: something that is not a kind of a sesquipedality is diametric thing that is a yield. sent14: if the driftwood is a sesquipedality that the W is not diametric and is a yield is false. sent15: the driftwood is a Orectolobidae. sent16: something contradistinguishes mysticism if that it is a tramontane hold. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a tramontane.
sent11 -> int1: that the driftwood is a sesquipedality that is a kind of a Orectolobidae is not wrong if it does not contradistinguish mysticism.; sent3 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the driftwood does not contradistinguish mysticism is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the driftwood is a sesquipedality and is a Orectolobidae.; int3 -> int4: the driftwood is a sesquipedality.; int4 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the W is non-diametric but it does yield.
sent16 -> int5: if the primaquine is a tramontane then it does contradistinguish mysticism.;
$hypothesis$ = the W is not diametric but it is a kind of a yield. ; $context$ = sent1: the driftwood is diametric. sent2: there exists something such that it crooks avatar. sent3: something is a tramontane and does crook avatar. sent4: if the driftwood is a sesquipedality then that the W is not a kind of a Orectolobidae and yields is incorrect. sent5: if the driftwood does not contradistinguish mysticism then it is a Orectolobidae. sent6: that the driftwood does not contradistinguish mysticism and is a kind of a yield is not correct if the W is diametric. sent7: if the W is not a Orectolobidae it is diametric thing that does contradistinguish mysticism. sent8: the driftwood does not contradistinguish mysticism if there exists something such that it is tramontane and does crook avatar. sent9: that the W is diametric and it yields is false. sent10: that the W is diametric thing that yields is not right if the driftwood is a sesquipedality. sent11: if something does not contradistinguish mysticism then it is a sesquipedality and it is a Orectolobidae. sent12: if something does not contradistinguish mysticism it is a Orectolobidae. sent13: something that is not a kind of a sesquipedality is diametric thing that is a yield. sent14: if the driftwood is a sesquipedality that the W is not diametric and is a yield is false. sent15: the driftwood is a Orectolobidae. sent16: something contradistinguishes mysticism if that it is a tramontane hold. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a tramontane. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: that the driftwood is a sesquipedality that is a kind of a Orectolobidae is not wrong if it does not contradistinguish mysticism.; sent3 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the driftwood does not contradistinguish mysticism is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the driftwood is a sesquipedality and is a Orectolobidae.; int3 -> int4: the driftwood is a sesquipedality.; int4 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__