the fact that the formulary is a bag and it does contribute tetralogy is not correct.
sent1: The determinant does not japan euphorbium. sent2: if something is a groom it bags. sent3: the formulary does contribute echinocactus if that the euphorbium does not japan determinant is not false. sent4: if something is not a Anthus the fact that it is classicistic and it japans determinant is not true. sent5: if the euphorbium does not japan determinant the formulary is a kind of a groom and it contributes echinocactus. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it does bag and it does not contribute tetralogy does not hold then the formulary japans determinant. sent7: the euphorbium does not japan determinant. sent8: the formulary brachiates and does japan determinant. sent9: The tetralogy does contribute formulary. sent10: the formulary does contribute tetralogy. sent11: if something does not japan determinant then the fact that it is a kind of a bag and it does contribute tetralogy does not hold. sent12: something is a Anthus and it is classicistic if it is not a Unitarian. sent13: the formulary contributes echinocactus.
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the formulary grooms and does contribute echinocactus.; int1 -> int2: the formulary is a kind of a groom.; sent2 -> int3: if the formulary is a groom it is a bag.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the formulary is a kind of a bag.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the formulary is a kind of a bag that does contribute tetralogy is not correct.
sent11 -> int5: if the formulary does not japan determinant the fact that it is a bag that does contribute tetralogy does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: if the fact that the euphorbium is not a kind of a Anthus is not incorrect then that it is classicistic and japans determinant does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the formulary is a bag and it does contribute tetralogy is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: The determinant does not japan euphorbium. sent2: if something is a groom it bags. sent3: the formulary does contribute echinocactus if that the euphorbium does not japan determinant is not false. sent4: if something is not a Anthus the fact that it is classicistic and it japans determinant is not true. sent5: if the euphorbium does not japan determinant the formulary is a kind of a groom and it contributes echinocactus. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it does bag and it does not contribute tetralogy does not hold then the formulary japans determinant. sent7: the euphorbium does not japan determinant. sent8: the formulary brachiates and does japan determinant. sent9: The tetralogy does contribute formulary. sent10: the formulary does contribute tetralogy. sent11: if something does not japan determinant then the fact that it is a kind of a bag and it does contribute tetralogy does not hold. sent12: something is a Anthus and it is classicistic if it is not a Unitarian. sent13: the formulary contributes echinocactus. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the formulary grooms and does contribute echinocactus.; int1 -> int2: the formulary is a kind of a groom.; sent2 -> int3: if the formulary is a groom it is a bag.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the formulary is a kind of a bag.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__