the aloes is not a plastid.
sent1: if the pruner is dermatologic and/or is a Cronartium the aloes is not a plastid. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not approach photocoagulation is correct. sent3: if there are equitable things then the fumigant is a kind of a jotter that is not a Anglican. sent4: the vintage does housekeep deputy if there is something such that it is a cotter that does not approach photocoagulation. sent5: the fact that the deist is a kind of a cotter and it does approach photocoagulation does not hold. sent6: if the fumigant is a kind of a jotter that is not Anglican the pruner is dermatologic. sent7: something is a plastid if it housekeeps deputy. sent8: if the fumigant housekeeps deputy then the vintage is not a kind of a jotter. sent9: the shore is not inequitable if that the deist is a cotter that does not approach photocoagulation does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deist is a cotter and does not approach photocoagulation.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a cotter and does not approach photocoagulation.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the vintage does housekeep deputy.;
the aloes is a plastid.
sent7 -> int3: if the aloes does housekeep deputy then it is a plastid.;
$hypothesis$ = the aloes is not a plastid. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pruner is dermatologic and/or is a Cronartium the aloes is not a plastid. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not approach photocoagulation is correct. sent3: if there are equitable things then the fumigant is a kind of a jotter that is not a Anglican. sent4: the vintage does housekeep deputy if there is something such that it is a cotter that does not approach photocoagulation. sent5: the fact that the deist is a kind of a cotter and it does approach photocoagulation does not hold. sent6: if the fumigant is a kind of a jotter that is not Anglican the pruner is dermatologic. sent7: something is a plastid if it housekeeps deputy. sent8: if the fumigant housekeeps deputy then the vintage is not a kind of a jotter. sent9: the shore is not inequitable if that the deist is a cotter that does not approach photocoagulation does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deist is a cotter and does not approach photocoagulation.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a cotter and does not approach photocoagulation.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the vintage does housekeep deputy.; __UNKNOWN__