the clattering prevents that the taxonomicness does not occur.
sent1: if the depressurizing takeaway happens then the clatter does not occur. sent2: if the depressurizing Taxus does not occur that the fact that the micrometry occurs and the clarioning does not occur is not incorrect does not hold. sent3: if the taxonomicness does not occur that the cannibalisticness and the depressurizing takeaway happens is not correct. sent4: the clatter does not occur if that the cannibalisticness occurs but the depressurizing takeaway does not occur is false. sent5: that the cannibalisticness happens and the depressurizing takeaway happens is incorrect. sent6: that the safety occurs but the electroshock does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the cannibalisticness but not the depressurizing takeaway occurs is not correct if the taxonomicness happens. sent8: the fact that the comforting does not occur is not false if that the Iberianness occurs but the entering monolith does not occur is not correct. sent9: the bromicness occurs. sent10: the entering nudge does not occur if the fact that the numbering but not the nidicolousness occurs is not right. sent11: the fact that both the entering barnful and the non-abdominovesicalness occurs is incorrect if the palatal does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the incurvating folktale and the non-fragrantness occurs is not right then the reverting does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the clatter happens.;
that the safety occurs but the electroshock does not occur does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the clattering prevents that the taxonomicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the depressurizing takeaway happens then the clatter does not occur. sent2: if the depressurizing Taxus does not occur that the fact that the micrometry occurs and the clarioning does not occur is not incorrect does not hold. sent3: if the taxonomicness does not occur that the cannibalisticness and the depressurizing takeaway happens is not correct. sent4: the clatter does not occur if that the cannibalisticness occurs but the depressurizing takeaway does not occur is false. sent5: that the cannibalisticness happens and the depressurizing takeaway happens is incorrect. sent6: that the safety occurs but the electroshock does not occur does not hold. sent7: that the cannibalisticness but not the depressurizing takeaway occurs is not correct if the taxonomicness happens. sent8: the fact that the comforting does not occur is not false if that the Iberianness occurs but the entering monolith does not occur is not correct. sent9: the bromicness occurs. sent10: the entering nudge does not occur if the fact that the numbering but not the nidicolousness occurs is not right. sent11: the fact that both the entering barnful and the non-abdominovesicalness occurs is incorrect if the palatal does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the incurvating folktale and the non-fragrantness occurs is not right then the reverting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the clatter happens.; __UNKNOWN__