that the potpie is not a Gallup but a Brownsville is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the mask leases euphuism is right. sent2: if something that elaborates reformism leases euphuism then the mask is non-metric. sent3: the potpie is a Brownsville if the friar's-cowl is non-metric. sent4: if something that does not elaborate ceibo is a kind of a Gallup it is not genital. sent5: the buttonhole does not lease euphuism and/or does not elaborate reformism. sent6: if the mask is not a Gallup but it is a Brownsville that it does not elaborate reformism hold. sent7: that the mask leases euphuism but it does not elaborate reformism is correct. sent8: if something that does lease euphuism does not elaborate reformism then the friar's-cowl does reship. sent9: if something that is not a Gallup is a kind of a Brownsville then that it is not sculptural hold. sent10: the potpie is not a Chipewyan and is not non-metric if it is not sculptural. sent11: if something that is not a Chipewyan is not non-metric then the friar's-cowl does not reship. sent12: if either something does not lease euphuism or it does not elaborate reformism or both then the ceibo does not reship. sent13: if there is something such that it does not reship then the potpie is not a Gallup.
sent9 -> int1: the potpie is not sculptural if it is not a Gallup and is a kind of a Brownsville.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potpie is both not a Gallup and a Brownsville.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the potpie is not sculptural.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the potpie is not a Chipewyan and not non-metric.; int3 -> int4: something is not a kind of a Chipewyan and is not non-metric.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the friar's-cowl does not reship.; sent7 -> int6: that something does lease euphuism and does not elaborate reformism is correct.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the friar's-cowl reships.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the encolure is not genital if it does not elaborate ceibo and is a Gallup.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the potpie is not a Gallup but a Brownsville is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mask leases euphuism is right. sent2: if something that elaborates reformism leases euphuism then the mask is non-metric. sent3: the potpie is a Brownsville if the friar's-cowl is non-metric. sent4: if something that does not elaborate ceibo is a kind of a Gallup it is not genital. sent5: the buttonhole does not lease euphuism and/or does not elaborate reformism. sent6: if the mask is not a Gallup but it is a Brownsville that it does not elaborate reformism hold. sent7: that the mask leases euphuism but it does not elaborate reformism is correct. sent8: if something that does lease euphuism does not elaborate reformism then the friar's-cowl does reship. sent9: if something that is not a Gallup is a kind of a Brownsville then that it is not sculptural hold. sent10: the potpie is not a Chipewyan and is not non-metric if it is not sculptural. sent11: if something that is not a Chipewyan is not non-metric then the friar's-cowl does not reship. sent12: if either something does not lease euphuism or it does not elaborate reformism or both then the ceibo does not reship. sent13: if there is something such that it does not reship then the potpie is not a Gallup. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the potpie is not sculptural if it is not a Gallup and is a kind of a Brownsville.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potpie is both not a Gallup and a Brownsville.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the potpie is not sculptural.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the potpie is not a Chipewyan and not non-metric.; int3 -> int4: something is not a kind of a Chipewyan and is not non-metric.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the friar's-cowl does not reship.; sent7 -> int6: that something does lease euphuism and does not elaborate reformism is correct.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the friar's-cowl reships.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__