that if the fact that the intimidation occurs does not hold then that not the tactfulness but the flip-flop happens is not right is wrong.
sent1: the intimidation is brought about by that not the tactfulness but the flip-flop occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tactfulness does not occur and the flip-flop occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the intimidation happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the intimidation does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the non-tactfulness and the flip-flop happens is false.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the intimidation occurs does not hold then that not the tactfulness but the flip-flop happens is not right is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the intimidation is brought about by that not the tactfulness but the flip-flop occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tactfulness does not occur and the flip-flop occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the intimidation happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the intimidation does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the non-tactfulness and the flip-flop happens is false.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__