the underwriting plonk happens.
sent1: that the litany does not occur is correct if the fact that the hotness does not occur and the corruptingness does not occur is not right. sent2: the stubbing talkie does not occur if the fact that the paramilitary does not occur and the sprucing does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the wholesomeness occurs the fact that the warpath does not occur and the fringing does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the non-experimentalness is prevented by that the warpath happens. sent5: that not the warpath but the fringing occurs is not correct. sent6: that the wholesomeness occurs is triggered by that the off-siteness happens. sent7: the fact that not the warpath but the fringing happens is not correct if the wholesomeness happens. sent8: that the extending R-2 does not occur and the jousting does not occur does not hold. sent9: if the fringe happens the underwriting plonk does not occur. sent10: the underwriting plonk does not occur if that the warpath does not occur and the fringing does not occur is wrong. sent11: the derring-do and the off-siteness happens. sent12: the derring-do occurs.
sent11 -> int1: the off-siteness happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the wholesomeness happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the warpath does not occur and the fringing does not occur is wrong.; sent10 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the experimentalness occurs and the extending cyprinid happens.
$hypothesis$ = the underwriting plonk happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the litany does not occur is correct if the fact that the hotness does not occur and the corruptingness does not occur is not right. sent2: the stubbing talkie does not occur if the fact that the paramilitary does not occur and the sprucing does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the wholesomeness occurs the fact that the warpath does not occur and the fringing does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the non-experimentalness is prevented by that the warpath happens. sent5: that not the warpath but the fringing occurs is not correct. sent6: that the wholesomeness occurs is triggered by that the off-siteness happens. sent7: the fact that not the warpath but the fringing happens is not correct if the wholesomeness happens. sent8: that the extending R-2 does not occur and the jousting does not occur does not hold. sent9: if the fringe happens the underwriting plonk does not occur. sent10: the underwriting plonk does not occur if that the warpath does not occur and the fringing does not occur is wrong. sent11: the derring-do and the off-siteness happens. sent12: the derring-do occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the off-siteness happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the wholesomeness happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the warpath does not occur and the fringing does not occur is wrong.; sent10 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__