the resection and the non-acneiformness occurs.
sent1: that the orgasm does not occur yields that the guttering Kean and the bacillarness happens. sent2: the guttering Kean does not occur if the magic and the resolution occurs. sent3: the carbonaceousness does not occur and/or the erupting does not occur. sent4: the guttering patronage does not occur. sent5: the tasting shock occurs if either the romantic happens or the mischance does not occur or both. sent6: if the carbonaceousness does not occur then that the orgasm does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: if the tasting shock happens then the fact that the resection occurs but the acneiformness does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the romanticness happens and/or the mischance does not occur if the resolution does not occur. sent9: that the orgasm does not occur if the erupting does not occur is true. sent10: if the guttering patronage does not occur then the magic happens.
sent10 & sent4 -> int1: the magic occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the resolution happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the magic happens and the resolution occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the guttering Kean does not occur.; sent3 & sent6 & sent9 -> int4: that the orgasm does not occur is not incorrect.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the guttering Kean and the bacillarness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the guttering Kean happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the resolution does not occur is true.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: either the romantic happens or the mischance does not occur or both.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the tasting shock happens.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the resection and the non-acneiformness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the orgasm does not occur yields that the guttering Kean and the bacillarness happens. sent2: the guttering Kean does not occur if the magic and the resolution occurs. sent3: the carbonaceousness does not occur and/or the erupting does not occur. sent4: the guttering patronage does not occur. sent5: the tasting shock occurs if either the romantic happens or the mischance does not occur or both. sent6: if the carbonaceousness does not occur then that the orgasm does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: if the tasting shock happens then the fact that the resection occurs but the acneiformness does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the romanticness happens and/or the mischance does not occur if the resolution does not occur. sent9: that the orgasm does not occur if the erupting does not occur is true. sent10: if the guttering patronage does not occur then the magic happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent4 -> int1: the magic occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the resolution happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the magic happens and the resolution occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the guttering Kean does not occur.; sent3 & sent6 & sent9 -> int4: that the orgasm does not occur is not incorrect.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the guttering Kean and the bacillarness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the guttering Kean happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the resolution does not occur is true.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: either the romantic happens or the mischance does not occur or both.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the tasting shock happens.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__