the malversation does not occur.
sent1: the asking chokepoint occurs. sent2: if the sobering occurs the affectation does not occur and the implicationalness does not occur. sent3: if the portableness does not occur the pressure does not occur and the discus does not occur. sent4: the counterblow occurs. sent5: if that not the casketing GABA but the somatosensoriness occurs hold the portable does not occur. sent6: the malversation does not occur if both the asking writer and the counterblow occurs. sent7: the idiographicness occurs and the gambit happens. sent8: the mediateness occurs. sent9: that the sobering but not the reply happens is triggered by that the pressure does not occur. sent10: the asking fare occurs. sent11: if the fact that the asking writer does not occur and the counterblow does not occur is not true the cleaving happens. sent12: that not the counterblow but the third occurs is caused by that the affectation does not occur. sent13: the fact that the asking writer does not occur and the counterblow does not occur does not hold if the malversation happens. sent14: if the counterblow does not occur then the asking writer and the malversation occurs.
the malversation happens.
$hypothesis$ = the malversation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the asking chokepoint occurs. sent2: if the sobering occurs the affectation does not occur and the implicationalness does not occur. sent3: if the portableness does not occur the pressure does not occur and the discus does not occur. sent4: the counterblow occurs. sent5: if that not the casketing GABA but the somatosensoriness occurs hold the portable does not occur. sent6: the malversation does not occur if both the asking writer and the counterblow occurs. sent7: the idiographicness occurs and the gambit happens. sent8: the mediateness occurs. sent9: that the sobering but not the reply happens is triggered by that the pressure does not occur. sent10: the asking fare occurs. sent11: if the fact that the asking writer does not occur and the counterblow does not occur is not true the cleaving happens. sent12: that not the counterblow but the third occurs is caused by that the affectation does not occur. sent13: the fact that the asking writer does not occur and the counterblow does not occur does not hold if the malversation happens. sent14: if the counterblow does not occur then the asking writer and the malversation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__