the favus does not monetize squadron.
sent1: the forequarter is sessile if the househusband is inextinguishable. sent2: there exists something such that that it is eukaryotic is correct. sent3: the fact that the favus is not a profanity but it is a kind of a shuttle is not right. sent4: if something is sessile then the fact that the favus is not a profanity and it is not a shuttle does not hold. sent5: the househusband is inextinguishable if that the basic is microcosmic is not incorrect. sent6: if that something is not a profanity and is not a shuttle is not right it does not monetize squadron. sent7: that that the favus is a profanity but it is not a shuttle is not true is true. sent8: the basic is microcosmic if there is something such that it is eukaryotic. sent9: that the favus is a profanity but it is not a shuttle is incorrect if there is something such that it is sessile.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: that the basic is microcosmic is not wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the househusband is inextinguishable.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the forequarter is sessile.; int3 -> int4: something is sessile.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the favus is not a profanity and it is not a shuttle is not right.; sent6 -> int6: the favus does not monetize squadron if the fact that it is both not a profanity and not a shuttle is not right.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the favus does not monetize squadron. ; $context$ = sent1: the forequarter is sessile if the househusband is inextinguishable. sent2: there exists something such that that it is eukaryotic is correct. sent3: the fact that the favus is not a profanity but it is a kind of a shuttle is not right. sent4: if something is sessile then the fact that the favus is not a profanity and it is not a shuttle does not hold. sent5: the househusband is inextinguishable if that the basic is microcosmic is not incorrect. sent6: if that something is not a profanity and is not a shuttle is not right it does not monetize squadron. sent7: that that the favus is a profanity but it is not a shuttle is not true is true. sent8: the basic is microcosmic if there is something such that it is eukaryotic. sent9: that the favus is a profanity but it is not a shuttle is incorrect if there is something such that it is sessile. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: that the basic is microcosmic is not wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the househusband is inextinguishable.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the forequarter is sessile.; int3 -> int4: something is sessile.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the favus is not a profanity and it is not a shuttle is not right.; sent6 -> int6: the favus does not monetize squadron if the fact that it is both not a profanity and not a shuttle is not right.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__