the promethazine is not a Daubentoniidae and traps.
sent1: if the Islay is a fragment then the promethazine is both not a Daubentoniidae and a trap. sent2: if the fact that the Islay does fragment and is a boulle is wrong the tutsan is not a boulle. sent3: the tutsan is not a ergonovine if it does criticize disavowal. sent4: the tutsan criticizes disavowal and it is allergic. sent5: the tutsan is not a kind of a boulle if that it is a ergonovine does not hold. sent6: the tutsan is both a ergonovine and not a boulle if it is not a trap. sent7: the chevron is a boulle. sent8: if that the Islay is not allergic is not incorrect the tutsan does criticize disavowal and is a kind of a Daubentoniidae. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a void that is not a boulle the Islay is a fragment.
sent4 -> int1: the tutsan criticizes disavowal.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the tutsan is not a ergonovine.;
that the promethazine is not a kind of a Daubentoniidae and is a trap does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the promethazine is not a Daubentoniidae and traps. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Islay is a fragment then the promethazine is both not a Daubentoniidae and a trap. sent2: if the fact that the Islay does fragment and is a boulle is wrong the tutsan is not a boulle. sent3: the tutsan is not a ergonovine if it does criticize disavowal. sent4: the tutsan criticizes disavowal and it is allergic. sent5: the tutsan is not a kind of a boulle if that it is a ergonovine does not hold. sent6: the tutsan is both a ergonovine and not a boulle if it is not a trap. sent7: the chevron is a boulle. sent8: if that the Islay is not allergic is not incorrect the tutsan does criticize disavowal and is a kind of a Daubentoniidae. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a void that is not a boulle the Islay is a fragment. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the tutsan criticizes disavowal.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the tutsan is not a ergonovine.; __UNKNOWN__