the gamekeeper is not illegal.
sent1: the gumdrop is not a cannery if the teff is not a cannery but it is a busybody. sent2: if that something is not annunciatory and is not a locoism is wrong it is a kind of a locoism. sent3: if the teff does not canvass it is not a cannery and it is a busybody. sent4: the contadino is an exit if the candytuft is not suborbital and it is not oleophobic. sent5: something does result flagfish but it is not oleophobic if it is suborbital. sent6: if the fact that the biochemist is both not an exit and a locoism is false then the gamekeeper is not annunciatory. sent7: if the biochemist is oleophobic it is a kind of suborbital thing that is not protective. sent8: the gumdrop does not result flagfish and is subsonic if it is not a cannery. sent9: if something is not protective it is not illegal. sent10: the candytuft is non-suborbital thing that is not oleophobic if there is something such that it does not result flagfish. sent11: if something is not annunciatory then it is suborbital. sent12: the teff does not canvass. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it either is not measurable or does dally or both is not right. sent14: that the fact that the biochemist is not annunciatory and is not a locoism hold is not correct if the contadino exits. sent15: if something results flagfish it is illegal. sent16: if something is unprotective then the fact that it is both not an exit and a locoism is not correct. sent17: if there is something such that that either it is not protective or it is illegal or both is false the biochemist does not result flagfish. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it does not dally is correct. sent19: that the gamekeeper is non-illegal thing that is a Hymen is wrong. sent20: if there exists something such that that it either is not measurable or dallies or both does not hold the biochemist is not protective.
sent13 & sent20 -> int1: the biochemist is unprotective.; sent16 -> int2: the fact that the biochemist is not an exit but it is a locoism is wrong if it is not protective.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the biochemist is not an exit and is a locoism is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the gamekeeper is not annunciatory.; sent11 -> int5: if the gamekeeper is not annunciatory then it is suborbital.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gamekeeper is suborbital.; sent5 -> int7: the gamekeeper does result flagfish but it is not oleophobic if it is suborbital.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the gamekeeper results flagfish and is not oleophobic.; int8 -> int9: the gamekeeper results flagfish.; sent15 -> int10: the gamekeeper is illegal if it results flagfish.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the gamekeeper is not illegal.
sent9 -> int11: the gamekeeper is not illegal if it is not protective.; sent2 -> int12: if the fact that the biochemist is not annunciatory and it is not a locoism is incorrect it is a kind of a locoism.; sent3 & sent12 -> int13: the teff is both not a cannery and a busybody.; sent1 & int13 -> int14: the gumdrop is not a cannery.; sent8 & int14 -> int15: the gumdrop does not result flagfish but it is subsonic.; int15 -> int16: the gumdrop does not result flagfish.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it does not result flagfish.; int17 & sent10 -> int18: the candytuft is both not suborbital and not oleophobic.; sent4 & int18 -> int19: the contadino does exit.; sent14 & int19 -> int20: that the biochemist is non-annunciatory thing that is not a locoism is not true.; int12 & int20 -> int21: the fact that the biochemist is a locoism is not incorrect.; int21 -> int22: there exists something such that it is a locoism.;
$hypothesis$ = the gamekeeper is not illegal. ; $context$ = sent1: the gumdrop is not a cannery if the teff is not a cannery but it is a busybody. sent2: if that something is not annunciatory and is not a locoism is wrong it is a kind of a locoism. sent3: if the teff does not canvass it is not a cannery and it is a busybody. sent4: the contadino is an exit if the candytuft is not suborbital and it is not oleophobic. sent5: something does result flagfish but it is not oleophobic if it is suborbital. sent6: if the fact that the biochemist is both not an exit and a locoism is false then the gamekeeper is not annunciatory. sent7: if the biochemist is oleophobic it is a kind of suborbital thing that is not protective. sent8: the gumdrop does not result flagfish and is subsonic if it is not a cannery. sent9: if something is not protective it is not illegal. sent10: the candytuft is non-suborbital thing that is not oleophobic if there is something such that it does not result flagfish. sent11: if something is not annunciatory then it is suborbital. sent12: the teff does not canvass. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it either is not measurable or does dally or both is not right. sent14: that the fact that the biochemist is not annunciatory and is not a locoism hold is not correct if the contadino exits. sent15: if something results flagfish it is illegal. sent16: if something is unprotective then the fact that it is both not an exit and a locoism is not correct. sent17: if there is something such that that either it is not protective or it is illegal or both is false the biochemist does not result flagfish. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it does not dally is correct. sent19: that the gamekeeper is non-illegal thing that is a Hymen is wrong. sent20: if there exists something such that that it either is not measurable or dallies or both does not hold the biochemist is not protective. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent20 -> int1: the biochemist is unprotective.; sent16 -> int2: the fact that the biochemist is not an exit but it is a locoism is wrong if it is not protective.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the biochemist is not an exit and is a locoism is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the gamekeeper is not annunciatory.; sent11 -> int5: if the gamekeeper is not annunciatory then it is suborbital.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gamekeeper is suborbital.; sent5 -> int7: the gamekeeper does result flagfish but it is not oleophobic if it is suborbital.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the gamekeeper results flagfish and is not oleophobic.; int8 -> int9: the gamekeeper results flagfish.; sent15 -> int10: the gamekeeper is illegal if it results flagfish.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__