the stint does not scald.
sent1: the archduke is not a scald. sent2: there is something such that it is substantial. sent3: if the archduke is not a buttonhook then it coos technetium and is a Brinton. sent4: the stint awes. sent5: if the fact that either something is a buttonhook or it is an awe or both is not correct it is a Bronte. sent6: the stint does blemish. sent7: the windbreak is substantial if that the Spender is substantial hold. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that that it awes and does immortalize stint is incorrect is right. sent9: if something is salamandriform then it either is Jamesian or does not blemish or both. sent10: the stint does awe if it does not immortalize stint. sent11: the Spender is substantial. sent12: The stint does not immortalize stint. sent13: the windbreak is a Brinton. sent14: the windbreak is a Brinton and it does coo technetium. sent15: the stint does not immortalize stint. sent16: that the archduke is a kind of non-salamandriform thing that is a kind of a Bronte is false if it does not scald. sent17: if the fact that something is not salamandriform but it is a Bronte is not correct then it is salamandriform. sent18: if the fact that something either is a buttonhook or is not an awe or both is not correct then it is a Bronte. sent19: something is substantial if it is Jamesian and/or it is not a blemish. sent20: if that the stint does not immortalize stint hold the fact that it is a buttonhook or not an awe or both is not right. sent21: the lot is not Jamesian if there exists something such that it coos technetium and is substantial. sent22: if that the stint either is a kind of a buttonhook or does awe or both is false it is a Bronte. sent23: if the lot is not Jamesian the stint is salamandriform and does blemish. sent24: there exists something such that it does coo technetium. sent25: something is nonfissile if it is substantial. sent26: if the lot is not Jamesian then the stint is a kind of a blemish.
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the windbreak coos technetium hold.; sent7 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the windbreak is substantial is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the windbreak coos technetium and is substantial.; int3 -> int4: something does coo technetium and is substantial.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the lot is not Jamesian.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the stint is a kind of salamandriform thing that does blemish.; int6 -> int7: the stint is salamandriform.; sent18 -> int8: if that the stint is either a buttonhook or not an awe or both is false then it is a kind of a Bronte.; sent20 & sent15 -> int9: that the stint is a kind of a buttonhook and/or it is not a kind of an awe is incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the stint is a Bronte.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the stint is salamandriform and is a Bronte.;
the archduke is nonfissile and it coos technetium.
sent25 -> int12: if that the archduke is substantial hold then it is nonfissile.; sent19 -> int13: if the fact that the archduke either is Jamesian or is not a blemish or both is true then that it is not substantial does not hold.; sent9 -> int14: either the archduke is Jamesian or it does not blemish or both if it is salamandriform.; sent17 -> int15: if the fact that the archduke is a kind of non-salamandriform thing that is a Bronte is not correct then it is salamandriform.; sent16 & sent1 -> int16: the fact that the archduke is not salamandriform but it is a Bronte does not hold.; int15 & int16 -> int17: the archduke is salamandriform.; int14 & int17 -> int18: the archduke is either Jamesian or not a blemish or both.; int13 & int18 -> int19: the archduke is substantial.; int12 & int19 -> int20: the archduke is nonfissile.;
$hypothesis$ = the stint does not scald. ; $context$ = sent1: the archduke is not a scald. sent2: there is something such that it is substantial. sent3: if the archduke is not a buttonhook then it coos technetium and is a Brinton. sent4: the stint awes. sent5: if the fact that either something is a buttonhook or it is an awe or both is not correct it is a Bronte. sent6: the stint does blemish. sent7: the windbreak is substantial if that the Spender is substantial hold. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that that it awes and does immortalize stint is incorrect is right. sent9: if something is salamandriform then it either is Jamesian or does not blemish or both. sent10: the stint does awe if it does not immortalize stint. sent11: the Spender is substantial. sent12: The stint does not immortalize stint. sent13: the windbreak is a Brinton. sent14: the windbreak is a Brinton and it does coo technetium. sent15: the stint does not immortalize stint. sent16: that the archduke is a kind of non-salamandriform thing that is a kind of a Bronte is false if it does not scald. sent17: if the fact that something is not salamandriform but it is a Bronte is not correct then it is salamandriform. sent18: if the fact that something either is a buttonhook or is not an awe or both is not correct then it is a Bronte. sent19: something is substantial if it is Jamesian and/or it is not a blemish. sent20: if that the stint does not immortalize stint hold the fact that it is a buttonhook or not an awe or both is not right. sent21: the lot is not Jamesian if there exists something such that it coos technetium and is substantial. sent22: if that the stint either is a kind of a buttonhook or does awe or both is false it is a Bronte. sent23: if the lot is not Jamesian the stint is salamandriform and does blemish. sent24: there exists something such that it does coo technetium. sent25: something is nonfissile if it is substantial. sent26: if the lot is not Jamesian then the stint is a kind of a blemish. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the fact that the windbreak coos technetium hold.; sent7 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the windbreak is substantial is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the windbreak coos technetium and is substantial.; int3 -> int4: something does coo technetium and is substantial.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the lot is not Jamesian.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the stint is a kind of salamandriform thing that does blemish.; int6 -> int7: the stint is salamandriform.; sent18 -> int8: if that the stint is either a buttonhook or not an awe or both is false then it is a kind of a Bronte.; sent20 & sent15 -> int9: that the stint is a kind of a buttonhook and/or it is not a kind of an awe is incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the stint is a Bronte.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the stint is salamandriform and is a Bronte.; __UNKNOWN__