the fact that the intron is not an asymptote and does not deprive gemma is not correct.
sent1: the arboretum is syncategorematic. sent2: if something dices it does subject Ameiuridae. sent3: that the bilge does not deprive gemma and it is not an asymptote does not hold if the intron is a kind of an asymptote. sent4: something is syncategorematic if it does subject Ameiuridae. sent5: the fact that the intron is an asymptote but it does not deprive gemma is not right. sent6: if the intron is not armorial it does dice. sent7: the fact that the intron is not an asymptote and it does not deprive gemma is not true if that the bilge does deprive gemma is true. sent8: the fact that the intron does subject virago and is not disorderly does not hold. sent9: the fact that the intron is not a kind of an asymptote but it does deprive gemma does not hold if the bilge does deprive gemma. sent10: the fact that the intron is not a kind of an asymptote but it does deprive gemma does not hold. sent11: the intron is not armorial or it is not a microphoning or both if it does not subject virago. sent12: something does not subject virago if the fact that it subject virago and it is not disorderly does not hold. sent13: the educationist does deprive gemma. sent14: that the intron is not an asymptote and it is not syncategorematic is not correct if the bilge is syncategorematic. sent15: the bilge is syncategorematic. sent16: that the intron is an asymptote that does not deprive gemma is not correct if the bilge deprive gemma. sent17: if the bilge is syncategorematic and it is an asymptote it does not deprive gemma. sent18: the fact that the bilge is not a kind of an asymptote and does not deprive gemma does not hold. sent19: that the bilge is not a morula is not right.
the intron is not an asymptote and does not deprive gemma.
sent4 -> int1: the intron is syncategorematic if it subjects Ameiuridae.; sent2 -> int2: if the intron dices then it does subject Ameiuridae.; sent12 -> int3: if that the intron subjects virago and is not disorderly is false then that it does not subjects virago is not false.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the intron does not subject virago.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the intron is not armorial and/or it is not a microphoning.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the intron is not an asymptote and does not deprive gemma is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the arboretum is syncategorematic. sent2: if something dices it does subject Ameiuridae. sent3: that the bilge does not deprive gemma and it is not an asymptote does not hold if the intron is a kind of an asymptote. sent4: something is syncategorematic if it does subject Ameiuridae. sent5: the fact that the intron is an asymptote but it does not deprive gemma is not right. sent6: if the intron is not armorial it does dice. sent7: the fact that the intron is not an asymptote and it does not deprive gemma is not true if that the bilge does deprive gemma is true. sent8: the fact that the intron does subject virago and is not disorderly does not hold. sent9: the fact that the intron is not a kind of an asymptote but it does deprive gemma does not hold if the bilge does deprive gemma. sent10: the fact that the intron is not a kind of an asymptote but it does deprive gemma does not hold. sent11: the intron is not armorial or it is not a microphoning or both if it does not subject virago. sent12: something does not subject virago if the fact that it subject virago and it is not disorderly does not hold. sent13: the educationist does deprive gemma. sent14: that the intron is not an asymptote and it is not syncategorematic is not correct if the bilge is syncategorematic. sent15: the bilge is syncategorematic. sent16: that the intron is an asymptote that does not deprive gemma is not correct if the bilge deprive gemma. sent17: if the bilge is syncategorematic and it is an asymptote it does not deprive gemma. sent18: the fact that the bilge is not a kind of an asymptote and does not deprive gemma does not hold. sent19: that the bilge is not a morula is not right. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__