the scissortail individuates subrogation.
sent1: the roentgenium is a Cystophora if the Iranian is patristics. sent2: the Iranian is patristics. sent3: the Iranian is a Cystophora if the roentgenium is patristics. sent4: the Iranian is a photophobia. sent5: if the Iranian is phallic then the scissortail does individuate subrogation. sent6: the roentgenium is both patristics and a photophobia. sent7: something is a photophobia if the fact that it is not a Cystophora and is not a kind of a photophobia is wrong. sent8: the Fuji does individuate subrogation. sent9: that the scissortail is phallic is correct if the Iranian individuates subrogation. sent10: that the roentgenium is patristics but it is not phallic is wrong if there exists something such that it does not individuate subrogation. sent11: the Iranian does not individuate subrogation.
sent6 -> int1: the roentgenium is patristics.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the Iranian is a Cystophora is not wrong.;
the Visigoth is a photophobia.
sent7 -> int3: the Visigoth is a photophobia if that it is not a Cystophora and it is not a photophobia is incorrect.; sent11 -> int4: there exists something such that it does not individuate subrogation.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the fact that the roentgenium is patristics but it is not phallic is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the scissortail individuates subrogation. ; $context$ = sent1: the roentgenium is a Cystophora if the Iranian is patristics. sent2: the Iranian is patristics. sent3: the Iranian is a Cystophora if the roentgenium is patristics. sent4: the Iranian is a photophobia. sent5: if the Iranian is phallic then the scissortail does individuate subrogation. sent6: the roentgenium is both patristics and a photophobia. sent7: something is a photophobia if the fact that it is not a Cystophora and is not a kind of a photophobia is wrong. sent8: the Fuji does individuate subrogation. sent9: that the scissortail is phallic is correct if the Iranian individuates subrogation. sent10: that the roentgenium is patristics but it is not phallic is wrong if there exists something such that it does not individuate subrogation. sent11: the Iranian does not individuate subrogation. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the roentgenium is patristics.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the Iranian is a Cystophora is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__