that the peel is a Albuquerque and not dishonest is not true.
sent1: that that the peel is a kind of a Albuquerque and it is not honest is incorrect hold. sent2: if the padauk is not a microscope then that the peel is a kind of a Albuquerque but it is honest is not right. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does not confine madrasa and is not holistic is false then the padauk is not a microscope. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does confine madrasa and it is not holistic is false. sent5: something that is a microscope is a Albuquerque and is not dishonest. sent6: the fact that the counterdemonstrator is a Kulanapan and not a narrowed does not hold. sent7: the padauk is not a microscope if there exists something such that it confines madrasa.
the peel is a Albuquerque but it is not dishonest.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that if the peel is a kind of the microscope the peel is a Albuquerque but it is not dishonest hold.; sent6 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Kulanapan and it is not a kind of a narrowed does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the peel is a Albuquerque and not dishonest is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the peel is a kind of a Albuquerque and it is not honest is incorrect hold. sent2: if the padauk is not a microscope then that the peel is a kind of a Albuquerque but it is honest is not right. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does not confine madrasa and is not holistic is false then the padauk is not a microscope. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does confine madrasa and it is not holistic is false. sent5: something that is a microscope is a Albuquerque and is not dishonest. sent6: the fact that the counterdemonstrator is a Kulanapan and not a narrowed does not hold. sent7: the padauk is not a microscope if there exists something such that it confines madrasa. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__