the meterstick is postural.
sent1: if that either something is a kind of a chemical or it does not winnow bustling or both is not right it is cross-ply. sent2: if the outthrust is not cross-ply or does winnow bustling or both then that it is not cross-ply is not wrong. sent3: something does winnow Sayda if it is hydrometric. sent4: the outthrust is not cross-ply or it winnows bustling or both. sent5: something is a refreshment if the fact that either it does winnow predictor or it does not yodel Prosopium or both does not hold. sent6: if something is illegitimate it winnows Bakelite. sent7: if the meterstick unpicks meterstick then it is a kind of a refreshment. sent8: something is a chemical if it is a refreshment. sent9: the outthrust is cross-ply if the meterstick winnows predictor and/or does not yodel Prosopium. sent10: the meterstick is not a Noether and/or is a spoonerism. sent11: if something is chemical it is postural. sent12: the meterstick either winnows predictor or does yodel Prosopium or both. sent13: something is a Noether if the fact that it is anthropogenetic is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meterstick does winnow predictor or does not yodel Prosopium or both.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the outthrust is cross-ply.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the outthrust is not cross-ply.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that either the meterstick does winnow predictor or it does not yodel Prosopium or both is wrong.; sent5 -> int5: the meterstick is a refreshment if that it does winnow predictor and/or does not yodel Prosopium is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the meterstick is a refreshment.; sent8 -> int7: if the meterstick is a refreshment then it is chemical.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the meterstick is a kind of a chemical.; sent11 -> int9: the meterstick is postural if it is a kind of a chemical.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the meterstick is postural. ; $context$ = sent1: if that either something is a kind of a chemical or it does not winnow bustling or both is not right it is cross-ply. sent2: if the outthrust is not cross-ply or does winnow bustling or both then that it is not cross-ply is not wrong. sent3: something does winnow Sayda if it is hydrometric. sent4: the outthrust is not cross-ply or it winnows bustling or both. sent5: something is a refreshment if the fact that either it does winnow predictor or it does not yodel Prosopium or both does not hold. sent6: if something is illegitimate it winnows Bakelite. sent7: if the meterstick unpicks meterstick then it is a kind of a refreshment. sent8: something is a chemical if it is a refreshment. sent9: the outthrust is cross-ply if the meterstick winnows predictor and/or does not yodel Prosopium. sent10: the meterstick is not a Noether and/or is a spoonerism. sent11: if something is chemical it is postural. sent12: the meterstick either winnows predictor or does yodel Prosopium or both. sent13: something is a Noether if the fact that it is anthropogenetic is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meterstick does winnow predictor or does not yodel Prosopium or both.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the outthrust is cross-ply.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the outthrust is not cross-ply.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that either the meterstick does winnow predictor or it does not yodel Prosopium or both is wrong.; sent5 -> int5: the meterstick is a refreshment if that it does winnow predictor and/or does not yodel Prosopium is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the meterstick is a refreshment.; sent8 -> int7: if the meterstick is a refreshment then it is chemical.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the meterstick is a kind of a chemical.; sent11 -> int9: the meterstick is postural if it is a kind of a chemical.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__