that the battlesight is a kind of a deep-sea is true.
sent1: if the baldhead is a kind of a isomerization then the broiler is a isomerization. sent2: the baldhead is a isomerization. sent3: if the watermelon is Dantean then the allotrope is black-and-white. sent4: the broiler does fart baldhead if there exists something such that that it is both not a doddle and not a skilly is not right. sent5: the battlesight is not deep-sea if the allotrope is a attenuation or it is black-and-white or both. sent6: the watermelon is Dantean if the broiler does not roll bombproof. sent7: something does not roll bombproof if it farts baldhead and is a isomerization. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a doddle and not a skilly is wrong.
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the broiler does fart baldhead.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the broiler is a isomerization.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the broiler farts baldhead and is a kind of a isomerization.; sent7 -> int4: if the broiler does fart baldhead and is a isomerization then it does not roll bombproof.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the broiler does not roll bombproof.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the watermelon is Dantean.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the allotrope is black-and-white.; int7 -> int8: the allotrope is a attenuation and/or it is black-and-white.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the battlesight is a kind of a deep-sea is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the baldhead is a kind of a isomerization then the broiler is a isomerization. sent2: the baldhead is a isomerization. sent3: if the watermelon is Dantean then the allotrope is black-and-white. sent4: the broiler does fart baldhead if there exists something such that that it is both not a doddle and not a skilly is not right. sent5: the battlesight is not deep-sea if the allotrope is a attenuation or it is black-and-white or both. sent6: the watermelon is Dantean if the broiler does not roll bombproof. sent7: something does not roll bombproof if it farts baldhead and is a isomerization. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a doddle and not a skilly is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the broiler does fart baldhead.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the broiler is a isomerization.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the broiler farts baldhead and is a kind of a isomerization.; sent7 -> int4: if the broiler does fart baldhead and is a isomerization then it does not roll bombproof.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the broiler does not roll bombproof.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the watermelon is Dantean.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the allotrope is black-and-white.; int7 -> int8: the allotrope is a attenuation and/or it is black-and-white.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__