the queuing Sweet occurs.
sent1: the fact that the stinking does not occur and the knotting Miss happens is not right if the queuing Sweet occurs. sent2: the autotrophicness does not occur if the fact that the fact that the iteration and the breeze occurs does not hold is right. sent3: the unacquisitiveness happens if that the counterdemonstration but not the studding occurs is not true. sent4: that the knotting Miss does not occur hold. sent5: that the blinkering tuff does not occur triggers that the knotting Miss does not occur. sent6: the fact that that the counterdemonstration happens and the studding does not occur is not true if the autotrophicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: the knotting parlor does not occur and the alabasterness does not occur. sent8: the knotting Miss does not occur if the fact that not the stinking but the knotting Miss happens is not true. sent9: if the security does not occur the queuing Sweet happens and the incongruousness happens. sent10: that the security occurs is not wrong. sent11: if the queuing brant does not occur then the fact that both the iteration and the breeze happens does not hold. sent12: that the queuing oilskin occurs is prevented by the unacquisitiveness. sent13: the non-fundamentalistness triggers that the knotting Miss happens and the stinking occurs. sent14: the blinkering Menura does not occur and the farming grog does not occur. sent15: that the clanger does not occur and the knotting Miss does not occur is brought about by that the blinkering tuff does not occur. sent16: the blinkering tuff does not occur if the incongruousness occurs and the security happens. sent17: that both the pursuance and the queuing momentum occurs prevents the stud. sent18: that the queuing brant does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the fact that the queuing brant occurs but the farming Papio does not occur is wrong is not incorrect. sent19: the incongruousness occurs. sent20: if the queuing oilskin does not occur then the queuing Sweet happens and the fundamentalist occurs. sent21: the fundamentalistness does not occur and the queuing oilskin does not occur if the unacquisitiveness occurs. sent22: if the knotting Miss occurs then the clanger occurs. sent23: if the security occurs but the incongruousness does not occur then the unconventionalness does not occur. sent24: that the queuing Sweet happens is prevented by that the clanger does not occur.
sent19 & sent10 -> int1: both the incongruousness and the security happens.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the blinkering tuff does not occur.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the clanger does not occur and the knotting Miss does not occur.; int3 -> int4: that the clanger does not occur is right.; sent24 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the queuing Sweet occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the queuing Sweet occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the stinking does not occur and the knotting Miss happens is not right if the queuing Sweet occurs. sent2: the autotrophicness does not occur if the fact that the fact that the iteration and the breeze occurs does not hold is right. sent3: the unacquisitiveness happens if that the counterdemonstration but not the studding occurs is not true. sent4: that the knotting Miss does not occur hold. sent5: that the blinkering tuff does not occur triggers that the knotting Miss does not occur. sent6: the fact that that the counterdemonstration happens and the studding does not occur is not true if the autotrophicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: the knotting parlor does not occur and the alabasterness does not occur. sent8: the knotting Miss does not occur if the fact that not the stinking but the knotting Miss happens is not true. sent9: if the security does not occur the queuing Sweet happens and the incongruousness happens. sent10: that the security occurs is not wrong. sent11: if the queuing brant does not occur then the fact that both the iteration and the breeze happens does not hold. sent12: that the queuing oilskin occurs is prevented by the unacquisitiveness. sent13: the non-fundamentalistness triggers that the knotting Miss happens and the stinking occurs. sent14: the blinkering Menura does not occur and the farming grog does not occur. sent15: that the clanger does not occur and the knotting Miss does not occur is brought about by that the blinkering tuff does not occur. sent16: the blinkering tuff does not occur if the incongruousness occurs and the security happens. sent17: that both the pursuance and the queuing momentum occurs prevents the stud. sent18: that the queuing brant does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the fact that the queuing brant occurs but the farming Papio does not occur is wrong is not incorrect. sent19: the incongruousness occurs. sent20: if the queuing oilskin does not occur then the queuing Sweet happens and the fundamentalist occurs. sent21: the fundamentalistness does not occur and the queuing oilskin does not occur if the unacquisitiveness occurs. sent22: if the knotting Miss occurs then the clanger occurs. sent23: if the security occurs but the incongruousness does not occur then the unconventionalness does not occur. sent24: that the queuing Sweet happens is prevented by that the clanger does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent10 -> int1: both the incongruousness and the security happens.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the blinkering tuff does not occur.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the clanger does not occur and the knotting Miss does not occur.; int3 -> int4: that the clanger does not occur is right.; sent24 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__