the fact that if the hoist is not a tansy the calcium-cyanamide is a kind of a Anthony is not true.
sent1: the luthier is limnological if the primus is not unseductive. sent2: if the primus is a kind of a Anthony then the fact that the pheno-safranine is a Anthony is correct. sent3: the primus is a Anthony if the fact that something is limnological hold. sent4: the primus is a Anthony. sent5: if the primus is not limnological then that the luthier is not unseductive but it is a kind of a cubism does not hold. sent6: something that is not a cubism and is not a kind of a tansy does not pigment lough. sent7: if the hoist is a tansy the calcium-cyanamide is a Anthony. sent8: the hoist does pigment lough if the primus is not a tansy. sent9: if the fact that the fact that something does not discriminate but it is unseductive is not false does not hold then it is not unseductive. sent10: if the primus pigments lough the hoist is a tansy. sent11: if the primus is limnological it does pigment lough. sent12: the luthier is not a dopamine. sent13: the calcium-cyanamide is not a tansy. sent14: something is not a cubism and not a tansy if it is not unseductive. sent15: something that pigments lough is limnological. sent16: the hoist is a Anthony. sent17: if the fact that the primus pigments lough hold then it is a tansy. sent18: that the luthier is unseductive but it is not a cubism is false. sent19: if something is not a dopamine then that the hoist is not discriminating and is unseductive is not correct. sent20: the calcium-cyanamide is unseductive. sent21: that the luthier is not seductive but it is not a cubism is not true if the primus is not limnological. sent22: the fact that the luthier is not unseductive but it is a cubism is not true. sent23: if that the luthier is not unseductive and it is not a kind of a cubism is not right the calcium-cyanamide is a Anthony. sent24: that the luthier is a kind of seductive thing that is not a cubism is not true if the primus is not limnological.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the primus is limnological.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the primus pigments lough.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the hoist is a kind of a tansy.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hoist is not a tansy.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the primus is not limnological is right.; sent24 & int4 -> int5: that the luthier is non-unseductive thing that is not a cubism is not true.; sent23 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the calcium-cyanamide is a Anthony is not wrong.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the pheno-safranine is a Anthony.
sent15 -> int7: if the hoist pigments lough it is limnological.; sent6 -> int8: the hoist does pigment lough if it is not a cubism and it is not a tansy.; sent14 -> int9: if the hoist is not unseductive it is not a cubism and it is not a kind of a tansy.; sent9 -> int10: the hoist is not unseductive if that it is not discriminating and not unseductive does not hold.; sent12 -> int11: something is not a kind of a dopamine.; int11 & sent19 -> int12: the fact that the hoist does not discriminate but it is unseductive is false.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the hoist is not unseductive.; int9 & int13 -> int14: the hoist is not a cubism and it is not a tansy.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the hoist does pigment lough.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the hoist is limnological is correct.; int16 -> int17: something is limnological.; int17 & sent3 -> int18: the primus is a kind of a Anthony.; sent2 & int18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the hoist is not a tansy the calcium-cyanamide is a kind of a Anthony is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the luthier is limnological if the primus is not unseductive. sent2: if the primus is a kind of a Anthony then the fact that the pheno-safranine is a Anthony is correct. sent3: the primus is a Anthony if the fact that something is limnological hold. sent4: the primus is a Anthony. sent5: if the primus is not limnological then that the luthier is not unseductive but it is a kind of a cubism does not hold. sent6: something that is not a cubism and is not a kind of a tansy does not pigment lough. sent7: if the hoist is a tansy the calcium-cyanamide is a Anthony. sent8: the hoist does pigment lough if the primus is not a tansy. sent9: if the fact that the fact that something does not discriminate but it is unseductive is not false does not hold then it is not unseductive. sent10: if the primus pigments lough the hoist is a tansy. sent11: if the primus is limnological it does pigment lough. sent12: the luthier is not a dopamine. sent13: the calcium-cyanamide is not a tansy. sent14: something is not a cubism and not a tansy if it is not unseductive. sent15: something that pigments lough is limnological. sent16: the hoist is a Anthony. sent17: if the fact that the primus pigments lough hold then it is a tansy. sent18: that the luthier is unseductive but it is not a cubism is false. sent19: if something is not a dopamine then that the hoist is not discriminating and is unseductive is not correct. sent20: the calcium-cyanamide is unseductive. sent21: that the luthier is not seductive but it is not a cubism is not true if the primus is not limnological. sent22: the fact that the luthier is not unseductive but it is a cubism is not true. sent23: if that the luthier is not unseductive and it is not a kind of a cubism is not right the calcium-cyanamide is a Anthony. sent24: that the luthier is a kind of seductive thing that is not a cubism is not true if the primus is not limnological. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the primus is limnological.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the primus pigments lough.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the hoist is a kind of a tansy.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hoist is not a tansy.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the primus is not limnological is right.; sent24 & int4 -> int5: that the luthier is non-unseductive thing that is not a cubism is not true.; sent23 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the calcium-cyanamide is a Anthony is not wrong.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__