that the oilcan is a kind of monozygotic a Merovingian is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the corkwood hands and is monozygotic is incorrect if the lepton is not a kind of a Orlando. sent2: if the sweetbread does not segregate anniversary and is a fundamentalist then the oilcan is not non-monozygotic. sent3: the fact that the corkwood either is not a Merovingian or is a hands or both is incorrect. sent4: the sweetbread is a fundamentalist if the fact that the oilcan is a fundamentalist and/or it is Merovingian does not hold. sent5: if the tarragon is a kind of an objective it is a Nammu and is not contrasty. sent6: the corkwood is a Merovingian. sent7: the fact that the tarragon is a kind of an objective is not incorrect. sent8: the sweetbread does not segregate anniversary but it is a fundamentalist. sent9: the corkwood is a Merovingian and is not non-monozygotic. sent10: if that the corkwood hands and it is monozygotic does not hold then the sweetbread is not monozygotic. sent11: that if the fact that the corkwood is not a Merovingian and/or it hands does not hold the oilcan is Merovingian hold. sent12: the sweetbread does not segregate anniversary. sent13: if something is not a Orlando and/or it is not contrasty it is not a Orlando.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the oilcan is monozygotic.; sent11 & sent3 -> int2: the oilcan is a Merovingian.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the oilcan is both monozygotic and Merovingian is incorrect.
sent13 -> int3: the lepton is not a kind of a Orlando if it is not a Orlando and/or is non-contrasty.; sent5 & sent7 -> int4: that the tarragon is a Nammu and is not contrasty is right.; int4 -> int5: the tarragon is not contrasty.; int5 -> int6: something is not contrasty.;
$hypothesis$ = that the oilcan is a kind of monozygotic a Merovingian is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the corkwood hands and is monozygotic is incorrect if the lepton is not a kind of a Orlando. sent2: if the sweetbread does not segregate anniversary and is a fundamentalist then the oilcan is not non-monozygotic. sent3: the fact that the corkwood either is not a Merovingian or is a hands or both is incorrect. sent4: the sweetbread is a fundamentalist if the fact that the oilcan is a fundamentalist and/or it is Merovingian does not hold. sent5: if the tarragon is a kind of an objective it is a Nammu and is not contrasty. sent6: the corkwood is a Merovingian. sent7: the fact that the tarragon is a kind of an objective is not incorrect. sent8: the sweetbread does not segregate anniversary but it is a fundamentalist. sent9: the corkwood is a Merovingian and is not non-monozygotic. sent10: if that the corkwood hands and it is monozygotic does not hold then the sweetbread is not monozygotic. sent11: that if the fact that the corkwood is not a Merovingian and/or it hands does not hold the oilcan is Merovingian hold. sent12: the sweetbread does not segregate anniversary. sent13: if something is not a Orlando and/or it is not contrasty it is not a Orlando. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the oilcan is monozygotic.; sent11 & sent3 -> int2: the oilcan is a Merovingian.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__