the puppeteer does not snowball sallet.
sent1: that that the bureaucrat does snowball vestrywoman and is a spearfish is not correct hold. sent2: the sallet does not snowball sallet if it does not consternate misappropriation and it is a kind of an intern. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it does snowball vestrywoman and does snowball sallet is not right. sent4: if the fact that the Nyala is axiological and it sends altoist does not hold then the galena does not sends altoist. sent5: the bureaucrat is not a Gerrhonotus. sent6: the puppeteer snowballs sallet and it is supportive if the perchloride is not an intern. sent7: the puppeteer does not snowball sallet if there is something such that it is not a kind of a spearfish. sent8: something snowballs vestrywoman and it is a spearfish. sent9: the bureaucrat does not snowball sandlot. sent10: that that the bureaucrat snowballs sallet and it snowballs vestrywoman is not false does not hold. sent11: if the perchloride does not snowball sallet the fact that the puppeteer does reissue retrospective and is indispensable does not hold. sent12: if the sallet does not consternate misappropriation the perchloride is not an intern. sent13: if the galena does not send altoist it is a fatherland. sent14: that the bureaucrat does snowball vestrywoman and snowballs sallet is not correct. sent15: the fact that the bureaucrat does snowball sallet and is a spearfish is not right. sent16: there is something such that that it is both ophthalmic and restful is incorrect. sent17: that something does not snowball sallet hold if the fact that it does snowball sallet and it is not supportive does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that that it snowballs earliness and is unshapely does not hold. sent19: that the bureaucrat is a kind of a spearfish and it snowballs sallet does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it snowballs vestrywoman and is a spearfish is wrong.;
there exists something such that the fact that it does reissue retrospective and it is indispensable does not hold.
sent17 -> int2: if the fact that the perchloride does snowball sallet and is not supportive is not true then it does not snowball sallet.;
$hypothesis$ = the puppeteer does not snowball sallet. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the bureaucrat does snowball vestrywoman and is a spearfish is not correct hold. sent2: the sallet does not snowball sallet if it does not consternate misappropriation and it is a kind of an intern. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it does snowball vestrywoman and does snowball sallet is not right. sent4: if the fact that the Nyala is axiological and it sends altoist does not hold then the galena does not sends altoist. sent5: the bureaucrat is not a Gerrhonotus. sent6: the puppeteer snowballs sallet and it is supportive if the perchloride is not an intern. sent7: the puppeteer does not snowball sallet if there is something such that it is not a kind of a spearfish. sent8: something snowballs vestrywoman and it is a spearfish. sent9: the bureaucrat does not snowball sandlot. sent10: that that the bureaucrat snowballs sallet and it snowballs vestrywoman is not false does not hold. sent11: if the perchloride does not snowball sallet the fact that the puppeteer does reissue retrospective and is indispensable does not hold. sent12: if the sallet does not consternate misappropriation the perchloride is not an intern. sent13: if the galena does not send altoist it is a fatherland. sent14: that the bureaucrat does snowball vestrywoman and snowballs sallet is not correct. sent15: the fact that the bureaucrat does snowball sallet and is a spearfish is not right. sent16: there is something such that that it is both ophthalmic and restful is incorrect. sent17: that something does not snowball sallet hold if the fact that it does snowball sallet and it is not supportive does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that that it snowballs earliness and is unshapely does not hold. sent19: that the bureaucrat is a kind of a spearfish and it snowballs sallet does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it snowballs vestrywoman and is a spearfish is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__