that the plagiarist is not a robin and it is not a placental does not hold.
sent1: the flatiron is not obligate and is Gandhian. sent2: if the closeup is not a kind of a placental that the plagiarist is a kind of a placental but it is not a kind of a cloaca does not hold. sent3: if there is something such that that it is a robin and a bustard does not hold the celebrant is a kind of a placental. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is clement and is a kind of a incorruptness is incorrect then the plagiarist is not clement. sent5: the celebrant is a kind of a bustard. sent6: if something is not a darter but it is unprophetic then it is not monovalent. sent7: if the celebrant is a robin and it is a bustard then it is not a kind of a cloaca. sent8: the fact that the closeup is not a placental and it is not monovalent is incorrect if the plagiarist is not a placental. sent9: something is a cloaca if it is middle. sent10: something is not a darter and is unprophetic if it is not clement. sent11: if the protegee is not sadistic then that the tissue is clement thing that is a kind of a incorruptness is not right. sent12: if the celebrant is not a kind of a robin then that the plagiarist is not a robin and it is not a placental is not true. sent13: the protegee is not sadistic if something that is not obligate is Gandhian. sent14: the fact that the farmhand does not sniff Anthony but it is a kind of a bustard is incorrect. sent15: if the closeup is not a cloaca it is not part-time. sent16: that the closeup is a robin and it is a bustard is not right if there exists something such that it is a cloaca. sent17: something that is both not a cloaca and middle is not a kind of a placental. sent18: that the closeup is a kind of a darter hold. sent19: that the closeup is non-part-time and monovalent does not hold if it is a darter. sent20: the closeup is monovalent. sent21: the fact that if something is a bustard or it is not a kind of a robin or both the plagiarist is not a robin is correct. sent22: the celebrant is meager and it is part-time.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the celebrant is a kind of a robin.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the celebrant is a robin and a bustard.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the celebrant is not a cloaca.; sent19 & sent18 -> int3: the fact that the closeup is both not part-time and monovalent is not right.;
the celebrant is a kind of a placental.
sent9 -> int4: if the plagiarist does middle then the fact that it is a cloaca hold.; sent6 -> int5: if the plagiarist is not a darter but it is unprophetic it is not monovalent.; sent10 -> int6: if the plagiarist is not clement then it is not a darter but unprophetic.; sent1 -> int7: there are non-obligate and Gandhian things.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the protegee is not sadistic.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the tissue is both clement and a incorruptness is wrong.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it is clement and it is a incorruptness is not correct.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the plagiarist is not clement.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the plagiarist is not a kind of a darter and is unprophetic.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the plagiarist is not monovalent.;
$hypothesis$ = that the plagiarist is not a robin and it is not a placental does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the flatiron is not obligate and is Gandhian. sent2: if the closeup is not a kind of a placental that the plagiarist is a kind of a placental but it is not a kind of a cloaca does not hold. sent3: if there is something such that that it is a robin and a bustard does not hold the celebrant is a kind of a placental. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is clement and is a kind of a incorruptness is incorrect then the plagiarist is not clement. sent5: the celebrant is a kind of a bustard. sent6: if something is not a darter but it is unprophetic then it is not monovalent. sent7: if the celebrant is a robin and it is a bustard then it is not a kind of a cloaca. sent8: the fact that the closeup is not a placental and it is not monovalent is incorrect if the plagiarist is not a placental. sent9: something is a cloaca if it is middle. sent10: something is not a darter and is unprophetic if it is not clement. sent11: if the protegee is not sadistic then that the tissue is clement thing that is a kind of a incorruptness is not right. sent12: if the celebrant is not a kind of a robin then that the plagiarist is not a robin and it is not a placental is not true. sent13: the protegee is not sadistic if something that is not obligate is Gandhian. sent14: the fact that the farmhand does not sniff Anthony but it is a kind of a bustard is incorrect. sent15: if the closeup is not a cloaca it is not part-time. sent16: that the closeup is a robin and it is a bustard is not right if there exists something such that it is a cloaca. sent17: something that is both not a cloaca and middle is not a kind of a placental. sent18: that the closeup is a kind of a darter hold. sent19: that the closeup is non-part-time and monovalent does not hold if it is a darter. sent20: the closeup is monovalent. sent21: the fact that if something is a bustard or it is not a kind of a robin or both the plagiarist is not a robin is correct. sent22: the celebrant is meager and it is part-time. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the celebrant is a kind of a robin.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the celebrant is a robin and a bustard.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the celebrant is not a cloaca.; sent19 & sent18 -> int3: the fact that the closeup is both not part-time and monovalent is not right.; __UNKNOWN__