the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a bulimic that it is non-weedless thing that does snuffle jackpot is wrong is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not Lusitanian the fact that it is not a sprawling and does tool Klee is not correct. sent2: if the dioxin is not optimistic the fact that it does not snuffle jackpot and it is a kind of a dissemination is not right. sent3: that the editor is not synesthetic but it tools wavelength is not right if it is not non-majors. sent4: there exists something such that if that it does inhale hold then that it is not univalent and it does rally Oxonian is not right. sent5: the fact that the self-stimulation is a kind of weedy thing that snuffles jackpot does not hold if it is not a kind of a bulimic. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a dredger then that it is Unitarian and it is a kind of an authority is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a bulimic then the fact that it is not weedless and it snuffles jackpot is not right. sent8: if the self-stimulation is not univalent that it is metamorphous and it is effortful is incorrect. sent9: the self-stimulation does not snuffle plumbism and is weedless if it does not tool wavelength.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a bulimic that it is non-weedless thing that does snuffle jackpot is wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not Lusitanian the fact that it is not a sprawling and does tool Klee is not correct. sent2: if the dioxin is not optimistic the fact that it does not snuffle jackpot and it is a kind of a dissemination is not right. sent3: that the editor is not synesthetic but it tools wavelength is not right if it is not non-majors. sent4: there exists something such that if that it does inhale hold then that it is not univalent and it does rally Oxonian is not right. sent5: the fact that the self-stimulation is a kind of weedy thing that snuffles jackpot does not hold if it is not a kind of a bulimic. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a dredger then that it is Unitarian and it is a kind of an authority is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a bulimic then the fact that it is not weedless and it snuffles jackpot is not right. sent8: if the self-stimulation is not univalent that it is metamorphous and it is effortful is incorrect. sent9: the self-stimulation does not snuffle plumbism and is weedless if it does not tool wavelength. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__