there is something such that if it does not repudiate it is a Clorox and it does not gauge Sousse.
sent1: the Fuji is a kind of a Clorox but it does not gauge Sousse if it does repudiate. sent2: something that does not unlock is both a Bradley and not exculpatory. sent3: the Fuji is a Clorox if it does not repudiate. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is not a push is not incorrect then it is a spandrel and does overawe resurvey. sent5: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not overawe tradeoff then it is a kind of a snips and it is not a harpsichord is correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is a steward then it is both a Kwangju and not a conductance. sent7: there is something such that if it does repudiate it is a Clorox and it does not gauge Sousse. sent8: if the fairlead is a mill-girl it tags porte-cochere and does not gauge Seleucus. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not repudiate is correct then it is a kind of a Clorox that does gauge Sousse is true. sent10: the Fuji is a Clorox that does not gauge Sousse if it does not repudiate. sent11: something that is not a keep overawes busybody and is not a acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene. sent12: there is something such that if it does not repudiate it is a kind of a Clorox.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a keep it does overawe busybody and it is not a acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene.
sent11 -> int1: if the anus is not a keep then it does overawe busybody and it is not a acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not repudiate it is a Clorox and it does not gauge Sousse. ; $context$ = sent1: the Fuji is a kind of a Clorox but it does not gauge Sousse if it does repudiate. sent2: something that does not unlock is both a Bradley and not exculpatory. sent3: the Fuji is a Clorox if it does not repudiate. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is not a push is not incorrect then it is a spandrel and does overawe resurvey. sent5: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not overawe tradeoff then it is a kind of a snips and it is not a harpsichord is correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is a steward then it is both a Kwangju and not a conductance. sent7: there is something such that if it does repudiate it is a Clorox and it does not gauge Sousse. sent8: if the fairlead is a mill-girl it tags porte-cochere and does not gauge Seleucus. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not repudiate is correct then it is a kind of a Clorox that does gauge Sousse is true. sent10: the Fuji is a Clorox that does not gauge Sousse if it does not repudiate. sent11: something that is not a keep overawes busybody and is not a acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene. sent12: there is something such that if it does not repudiate it is a kind of a Clorox. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__