the Pneumovax is not anisometropic.
sent1: the imidazole does dive iceman. sent2: something that is absent does not respect solmization and/or is positional. sent3: the bookmaker is not anisometropic. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a halal and is not a biodefense is incorrect then the Pneumovax does respect solmization. sent5: if something either does not listen or absents or both then it does absents. sent6: if something is not anisometropic it does respect solmization and it is a kind of a punt. sent7: if the fire-eater is absent then it is positional. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a halal and is not a biodefense is false. sent9: the bookmaker is not anisometropic if it respects solmization and does listen. sent10: if the Pneumovax is a choke the fire-eater is not anisometropic. sent11: the bookmaker is positional if there is something such that it listens. sent12: the fact that the fact that the Pneumovax does listen is correct if there is something such that the fact that it does not respect solmization and is not absent is incorrect is true. sent13: something is not positional if it is anisometropic thing that respects solmization. sent14: the Pneumovax is a choke and is a highlighter if that it is not fruitful is not false. sent15: the bookmaker does absent and listens. sent16: the Pneumovax is positional if the fact that something does absent is not incorrect. sent17: the Pneumovax spreads nucleus and it purples quackgrass.
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the Pneumovax respects solmization.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Pneumovax is anisometropic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Pneumovax is anisometropic and respects solmization.; sent13 -> int3: if the Pneumovax is anisometropic and does respect solmization it is not positional.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Pneumovax is not positional.; sent15 -> int5: the bookmaker is absent.; int5 -> int6: there are absent things.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the fact that the Pneumovax is positional is true.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the Pneumovax is anisometropic.
sent2 -> int9: if the beetle absents either it does not respect solmization or it is positional or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the Pneumovax is not anisometropic. ; $context$ = sent1: the imidazole does dive iceman. sent2: something that is absent does not respect solmization and/or is positional. sent3: the bookmaker is not anisometropic. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a halal and is not a biodefense is incorrect then the Pneumovax does respect solmization. sent5: if something either does not listen or absents or both then it does absents. sent6: if something is not anisometropic it does respect solmization and it is a kind of a punt. sent7: if the fire-eater is absent then it is positional. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a halal and is not a biodefense is false. sent9: the bookmaker is not anisometropic if it respects solmization and does listen. sent10: if the Pneumovax is a choke the fire-eater is not anisometropic. sent11: the bookmaker is positional if there is something such that it listens. sent12: the fact that the fact that the Pneumovax does listen is correct if there is something such that the fact that it does not respect solmization and is not absent is incorrect is true. sent13: something is not positional if it is anisometropic thing that respects solmization. sent14: the Pneumovax is a choke and is a highlighter if that it is not fruitful is not false. sent15: the bookmaker does absent and listens. sent16: the Pneumovax is positional if the fact that something does absent is not incorrect. sent17: the Pneumovax spreads nucleus and it purples quackgrass. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the Pneumovax respects solmization.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Pneumovax is anisometropic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Pneumovax is anisometropic and respects solmization.; sent13 -> int3: if the Pneumovax is anisometropic and does respect solmization it is not positional.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Pneumovax is not positional.; sent15 -> int5: the bookmaker is absent.; int5 -> int6: there are absent things.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the fact that the Pneumovax is positional is true.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__