that if the incidentalness happens the cancellation happens is wrong.
sent1: the screening happens. sent2: both the non-pediatricsness and the revelation happens if the screening happens. sent3: the cancellation happens if the fact that the incidental does not occur and the snuffing chondrite does not occur is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incidentalness does not occur and the snuffing chondrite does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the incidental does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the incidentalness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the incidentalness does not occur and the snuffing chondrite does not occur is false.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the cancellation occurs is correct.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the pediatricsness does not occur and the freshet does not occur.
sent2 & sent1 -> int5: both the non-pediatricsness and the revelation happens.; int5 -> int6: that the pediatricsness does not occur is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the incidentalness happens the cancellation happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the screening happens. sent2: both the non-pediatricsness and the revelation happens if the screening happens. sent3: the cancellation happens if the fact that the incidental does not occur and the snuffing chondrite does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incidentalness does not occur and the snuffing chondrite does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the incidental does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the incidentalness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the incidentalness does not occur and the snuffing chondrite does not occur is false.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the cancellation occurs is correct.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__