the naturalist does not chain-smoke.
sent1: if the etamine is a Paradoxurus the naturalist chain-smokes. sent2: the fact that something does chain-smoke and is a Paradoxurus is not false if it is not impressive. sent3: something is not virile. sent4: that the etamine is a kind of a Paradoxurus hold if there is something such that it is not virile. sent5: if the naturalist is a RI it is not a kind of a sweetness. sent6: the naturalist does not chain-smoke if the etamine does not chain-smoke and it is not a Paradoxurus. sent7: something does not chain-smoke and is not a Paradoxurus if it is not virile. sent8: if something does not chain-smoke the naturalist is a Paradoxurus. sent9: the naturalist is a RI. sent10: something is agrobiologic or not impressive or both if it is not a sweetness.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the etamine is a Paradoxurus.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the naturalist does not chain-smoke.
sent7 -> int2: if the etamine is not virile it does not chain-smoke and is not a Paradoxurus.;
$hypothesis$ = the naturalist does not chain-smoke. ; $context$ = sent1: if the etamine is a Paradoxurus the naturalist chain-smokes. sent2: the fact that something does chain-smoke and is a Paradoxurus is not false if it is not impressive. sent3: something is not virile. sent4: that the etamine is a kind of a Paradoxurus hold if there is something such that it is not virile. sent5: if the naturalist is a RI it is not a kind of a sweetness. sent6: the naturalist does not chain-smoke if the etamine does not chain-smoke and it is not a Paradoxurus. sent7: something does not chain-smoke and is not a Paradoxurus if it is not virile. sent8: if something does not chain-smoke the naturalist is a Paradoxurus. sent9: the naturalist is a RI. sent10: something is agrobiologic or not impressive or both if it is not a sweetness. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the etamine is a Paradoxurus.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__