that the fact that the Danish happens and the liliaceousness happens is not correct if the starving does not occur is not right.
sent1: both the non-Danishness and the liliaceousness happens if the subrogating Leucanthemum does not occur. sent2: if the nonconductiveness does not occur then the fact that both the Danishness and the liliaceousness occurs is wrong. sent3: if the starving happens then the fact that the Danishness happens and the liliaceousness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the philhellenicness does not occur then the fact that both the episode and the bundling Dysdercus happens is wrong. sent5: the Danish happens and the liliaceousness happens if the starving does not occur. sent6: either the starving or the nonconductiveness or both happens if the Danishness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the immeasurableness occurs and the besoting positioner occurs is false if the besoting southernism does not occur. sent8: if the nonconductiveness occurs then the starving happens. sent9: the attendance and the lysogenizing teff occurs if the subrogating Pembroke does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nonconductiveness occurs.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the starving happens is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the starving does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the nonconductiveness does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: that both the Danishness and the liliaceousness happens is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the challenge occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the Danish happens and the liliaceousness happens is not correct if the starving does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: both the non-Danishness and the liliaceousness happens if the subrogating Leucanthemum does not occur. sent2: if the nonconductiveness does not occur then the fact that both the Danishness and the liliaceousness occurs is wrong. sent3: if the starving happens then the fact that the Danishness happens and the liliaceousness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the philhellenicness does not occur then the fact that both the episode and the bundling Dysdercus happens is wrong. sent5: the Danish happens and the liliaceousness happens if the starving does not occur. sent6: either the starving or the nonconductiveness or both happens if the Danishness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the immeasurableness occurs and the besoting positioner occurs is false if the besoting southernism does not occur. sent8: if the nonconductiveness occurs then the starving happens. sent9: the attendance and the lysogenizing teff occurs if the subrogating Pembroke does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nonconductiveness occurs.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the starving happens is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the starving does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the nonconductiveness does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: that both the Danishness and the liliaceousness happens is not correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__