the technophobe is a milliard.
sent1: that the imprint is evangelistic and does repent typhoon is not correct. sent2: if the imprint is not a kind of a Samoa then the fact that the demand is not a kind of a aptness and is not a milliard is not right. sent3: something does not nag silks if the fact that it nags Ute and is not jittery is not correct. sent4: the technophobe is cytophotometric if there is something such that that it is temperamental and is not cytophotometric does not hold. sent5: the basin does repent imprint and is a birchbark. sent6: the toke is temperamental. sent7: the fact that the imprint is not evangelistic hold if that the fact that it is evangelistic and repents typhoon is correct is not right. sent8: if the executioner does nag Ute that it tarnishes technophobe hold. sent9: if the executioner is both not a milliard and not jittery the fact that the technophobe nags silks is right. sent10: that the fact that something is temperamental thing that is not cytophotometric hold does not hold if it repents imprint. sent11: if the toke does not nag Ute and it does not chomp verge the technophobe is a kind of a milliard. sent12: something is temperamental. sent13: if something is jittery that it does not nag silks and does not nag Ute is not true. sent14: the maze is unborn if the toke is unborn. sent15: That the silks does nag executioner is not false. sent16: that the executioner does nag silks is not false. sent17: if there exists something such that that it does not nag Ute hold then that the maze nag Ute but it is not jittery is not true. sent18: if the toke is a kind of a milliard it does not nag Ute and is cytophotometric. sent19: the generalissimo does nag silks. sent20: if the imprint is non-evangelistic that it does not nag retinopathy and is not a whorlywort is incorrect. sent21: the toke does nag silks if it does nag Ute. sent22: if that something is not a aptness and not a milliard is false then it is a milliard. sent23: the toke does not chomp verge but it is cytophotometric if it is temperamental. sent24: something is not a kind of a Samoa if that it does not nag retinopathy and is not a kind of a whorlywort does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the toke does nag Ute is not wrong.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the toke does nag silks.; sent23 & sent6 -> int2: the toke does not chomp verge but it is cytophotometric.; int2 -> int3: the toke does not chomp verge.;
the maze does not nag silks and is unborn.
sent3 -> int4: the maze does not nag silks if that it nags Ute and it is not jittery is not true.; sent22 -> int5: the demand is a milliard if that it is not a kind of a aptness and it is not a kind of a milliard is not right.; sent24 -> int6: that the imprint is not a kind of a Samoa is correct if that it does not nag retinopathy and is not a kind of a whorlywort is wrong.; sent7 & sent1 -> int7: the imprint is not evangelistic.; sent20 & int7 -> int8: that the imprint does not nag retinopathy and is not a whorlywort does not hold.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the imprint is not a Samoa.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the demand is not a kind of a aptness and it is not a milliard does not hold.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the demand is a milliard.; int11 -> int12: something is a milliard.; sent10 -> int13: the fact that the basin is both temperamental and non-cytophotometric is false if it does repent imprint.; sent5 -> int14: the basin repents imprint.; int13 & int14 -> int15: that the basin is temperamental thing that is not cytophotometric is not right.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that that it is temperamental and it is not cytophotometric does not hold.; int16 & sent4 -> int17: the technophobe is cytophotometric.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is cytophotometric.;
$hypothesis$ = the technophobe is a milliard. ; $context$ = sent1: that the imprint is evangelistic and does repent typhoon is not correct. sent2: if the imprint is not a kind of a Samoa then the fact that the demand is not a kind of a aptness and is not a milliard is not right. sent3: something does not nag silks if the fact that it nags Ute and is not jittery is not correct. sent4: the technophobe is cytophotometric if there is something such that that it is temperamental and is not cytophotometric does not hold. sent5: the basin does repent imprint and is a birchbark. sent6: the toke is temperamental. sent7: the fact that the imprint is not evangelistic hold if that the fact that it is evangelistic and repents typhoon is correct is not right. sent8: if the executioner does nag Ute that it tarnishes technophobe hold. sent9: if the executioner is both not a milliard and not jittery the fact that the technophobe nags silks is right. sent10: that the fact that something is temperamental thing that is not cytophotometric hold does not hold if it repents imprint. sent11: if the toke does not nag Ute and it does not chomp verge the technophobe is a kind of a milliard. sent12: something is temperamental. sent13: if something is jittery that it does not nag silks and does not nag Ute is not true. sent14: the maze is unborn if the toke is unborn. sent15: That the silks does nag executioner is not false. sent16: that the executioner does nag silks is not false. sent17: if there exists something such that that it does not nag Ute hold then that the maze nag Ute but it is not jittery is not true. sent18: if the toke is a kind of a milliard it does not nag Ute and is cytophotometric. sent19: the generalissimo does nag silks. sent20: if the imprint is non-evangelistic that it does not nag retinopathy and is not a whorlywort is incorrect. sent21: the toke does nag silks if it does nag Ute. sent22: if that something is not a aptness and not a milliard is false then it is a milliard. sent23: the toke does not chomp verge but it is cytophotometric if it is temperamental. sent24: something is not a kind of a Samoa if that it does not nag retinopathy and is not a kind of a whorlywort does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the toke does nag Ute is not wrong.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the toke does nag silks.; sent23 & sent6 -> int2: the toke does not chomp verge but it is cytophotometric.; int2 -> int3: the toke does not chomp verge.; __UNKNOWN__