that the fact that the ADA is corrigible and it is a concretion is not right is not incorrect.
sent1: the ADA does grimace. sent2: the shopping is not a Katharevusa if the monstrosity does patronize umbrage but it is not a kind of a Katharevusa. sent3: the catwalk is a kind of a grimace. sent4: if something does din Jordanian it does patronize umbrage and it is not a Katharevusa. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it does snuff occiput and is ambassadorial is false. sent6: there exists something such that it is psychoactive thing that patronizes umbrage. sent7: if the ADA is not ambassadorial and it is not a Katharevusa then that the catwalk is a kind of a Katharevusa is correct. sent8: the ADA is a concretion and it is ambassadorial. sent9: if the shopping is not a Katharevusa the fact that it is psychoactive and not a grimace is not true. sent10: if the ADA does grimace then it is corrigible.
sent8 -> int1: the ADA is a kind of a concretion.; sent10 & sent1 -> int2: the ADA is corrigible.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the ADA is corrigible and is a concretion is incorrect.
sent4 -> int3: the monstrosity does patronize umbrage but it is not a Katharevusa if it dins Jordanian.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the ADA is corrigible and it is a concretion is not right is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the ADA does grimace. sent2: the shopping is not a Katharevusa if the monstrosity does patronize umbrage but it is not a kind of a Katharevusa. sent3: the catwalk is a kind of a grimace. sent4: if something does din Jordanian it does patronize umbrage and it is not a Katharevusa. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it does snuff occiput and is ambassadorial is false. sent6: there exists something such that it is psychoactive thing that patronizes umbrage. sent7: if the ADA is not ambassadorial and it is not a Katharevusa then that the catwalk is a kind of a Katharevusa is correct. sent8: the ADA is a concretion and it is ambassadorial. sent9: if the shopping is not a Katharevusa the fact that it is psychoactive and not a grimace is not true. sent10: if the ADA does grimace then it is corrigible. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the ADA is a kind of a concretion.; sent10 & sent1 -> int2: the ADA is corrigible.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__