the landside is phonogramic.
sent1: the burin is branchial if there exists something such that it is a kind of a isochrone. sent2: if the burin is not mandibulate the fact that it is not an eldorado and it is not branchial does not hold. sent3: the fact that the burin is not a Melkite and not mandibulate is incorrect if the jugale is non-branchial. sent4: that the capitate is not a Algerian and it is not translational does not hold if the fact that it is not an eldorado hold. sent5: if the fact that the jugale is a kind of mandibulate a chlordiazepoxide is incorrect the capitate is not an eldorado. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a isochrone and it does not clue lypressin is not right. sent7: that the capitate is a Algerian but it is not translational is false if the fact that it is not an eldorado hold. sent8: the burin is a kind of a least. sent9: that the capitate is both Algerian and phonogramic is incorrect if the fact that the landside is not a kind of a Algerian is true. sent10: the jugale is a Melkite. sent11: the burin is translational. sent12: something is not a isochrone and it does not clue lypressin. sent13: the burin is a kind of a Melkite. sent14: the fact that the jugale is both mandibulate and a chlordiazepoxide is false if the burin is not mandibulate. sent15: the burin is not non-branchial if that there is something such that the fact that it is not a isochrone and does not clue lypressin is incorrect is not false. sent16: if the capitate is not an eldorado then that it is not a Algerian but translational does not hold. sent17: if the jugale is not translational the capitate is not a chlordiazepoxide. sent18: if something is a kind of mandibulate thing that is not branchial then it is not phonogramic. sent19: the fact that the capitate is not a Melkite is not incorrect. sent20: that the jugale is a chlordiazepoxide but it is not branchial is wrong. sent21: that the serger is a kind of an eldorado and it is a caragana is false. sent22: if that the capitate is not Algerian and is not translational is not correct the landside is phonogramic.
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the burin is branchial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the burin is mandibulate.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the burin is branchial and it is mandibulate.;
the landside is not phonogramic.
sent18 -> int3: if the landside is a kind of mandibulate thing that is not branchial then it is non-phonogramic.;
$hypothesis$ = the landside is phonogramic. ; $context$ = sent1: the burin is branchial if there exists something such that it is a kind of a isochrone. sent2: if the burin is not mandibulate the fact that it is not an eldorado and it is not branchial does not hold. sent3: the fact that the burin is not a Melkite and not mandibulate is incorrect if the jugale is non-branchial. sent4: that the capitate is not a Algerian and it is not translational does not hold if the fact that it is not an eldorado hold. sent5: if the fact that the jugale is a kind of mandibulate a chlordiazepoxide is incorrect the capitate is not an eldorado. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a isochrone and it does not clue lypressin is not right. sent7: that the capitate is a Algerian but it is not translational is false if the fact that it is not an eldorado hold. sent8: the burin is a kind of a least. sent9: that the capitate is both Algerian and phonogramic is incorrect if the fact that the landside is not a kind of a Algerian is true. sent10: the jugale is a Melkite. sent11: the burin is translational. sent12: something is not a isochrone and it does not clue lypressin. sent13: the burin is a kind of a Melkite. sent14: the fact that the jugale is both mandibulate and a chlordiazepoxide is false if the burin is not mandibulate. sent15: the burin is not non-branchial if that there is something such that the fact that it is not a isochrone and does not clue lypressin is incorrect is not false. sent16: if the capitate is not an eldorado then that it is not a Algerian but translational does not hold. sent17: if the jugale is not translational the capitate is not a chlordiazepoxide. sent18: if something is a kind of mandibulate thing that is not branchial then it is not phonogramic. sent19: the fact that the capitate is not a Melkite is not incorrect. sent20: that the jugale is a chlordiazepoxide but it is not branchial is wrong. sent21: that the serger is a kind of an eldorado and it is a caragana is false. sent22: if that the capitate is not Algerian and is not translational is not correct the landside is phonogramic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the burin is branchial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the burin is mandibulate.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the burin is branchial and it is mandibulate.; __UNKNOWN__