the ladyfish is empyreal.
sent1: if there are non-isometric things then the fact that the ladyfish is non-isometric and it is artiodactyl does not hold. sent2: if there exists something such that it does not symbolize obscenity the borer is both empyreal and genital. sent3: if there exists something such that that it does bide and is an ordinary is not right that the ladyfish is monotypic hold. sent4: if that something is not non-monotypic and not non-genital is not incorrect then it is not empyreal. sent5: if the borer is genital then it is not monotypic and it is not a isometric. sent6: something is genital if the fact that it does symbolize obscenity and is non-isometric does not hold. sent7: that the quira bides and it is ordinary is incorrect. sent8: that the ladyfish does symbolize obscenity and is non-isometric is false.
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that that it bides and is an ordinary is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the ladyfish is monotypic.; sent6 -> int3: if the fact that the ladyfish does symbolize obscenity but it is not a isometric is false it is genital.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the ladyfish is genital.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the ladyfish is a kind of monotypic thing that is genital.; sent4 -> int6: if the ladyfish is a kind of monotypic thing that is genital it is not empyreal.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the ladyfish is isometric and it is an artiodactyl is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the ladyfish is empyreal. ; $context$ = sent1: if there are non-isometric things then the fact that the ladyfish is non-isometric and it is artiodactyl does not hold. sent2: if there exists something such that it does not symbolize obscenity the borer is both empyreal and genital. sent3: if there exists something such that that it does bide and is an ordinary is not right that the ladyfish is monotypic hold. sent4: if that something is not non-monotypic and not non-genital is not incorrect then it is not empyreal. sent5: if the borer is genital then it is not monotypic and it is not a isometric. sent6: something is genital if the fact that it does symbolize obscenity and is non-isometric does not hold. sent7: that the quira bides and it is ordinary is incorrect. sent8: that the ladyfish does symbolize obscenity and is non-isometric is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that that it bides and is an ordinary is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the ladyfish is monotypic.; sent6 -> int3: if the fact that the ladyfish does symbolize obscenity but it is not a isometric is false it is genital.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the ladyfish is genital.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the ladyfish is a kind of monotypic thing that is genital.; sent4 -> int6: if the ladyfish is a kind of monotypic thing that is genital it is not empyreal.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__