the fact that the calamint snoozes is correct.
sent1: if the fact that something is a Lythrum and is a trident is not correct it does not integrate fluoroscopy. sent2: if the hickory does not snooze and does not overburden luciferin then the calamint does not snooze. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not salty the hickory is not a trawler. sent4: the fact that the livestock is salty and it is a trident is wrong. sent5: if the Punjabi is not cursorial then the fact that the dolphin is splenic and/or is hydrostatics is not right. sent6: the fact that the calamint overburdens luciferin is correct. sent7: the fact that the nut is a Lythrum but it does not integrate fluoroscopy is not correct if the dolphin is not a kind of a trawler. sent8: that the livestock is a kind of a Lythrum and it is a kind of a trident is wrong if the hickory is not salty. sent9: if the nut is not a trawler the calamint snoozes. sent10: the livestock does overburden luciferin. sent11: if the livestock is not a kind of a Lythrum that it does not integrate fluoroscopy is not incorrect. sent12: if there exists something such that it does rebuild the substitute either is not cursorial or does not mystify subculture or both. sent13: if the livestock does not integrate fluoroscopy then the nut is not a kind of a trawler. sent14: if something is not a Lythrum then it does not integrate fluoroscopy. sent15: the hickory is not salty if something does not overburden luciferin. sent16: if the calamint does not integrate fluoroscopy then it does not snooze. sent17: the hickory is a kind of a trident and it is not non-salty if the livestock is not a Lythrum. sent18: something does not overburden luciferin. sent19: something is not a kind of a pick if the fact that it is a aspergill and a nephrology is false. sent20: the fact that the nut is salty and it is a trawler does not hold if the fact that the livestock is not a Lythrum hold. sent21: that the fact that the livestock is a Lythrum and it is salty is not false is wrong. sent22: if the fact that something is splenic and/or it is hydrostatics does not hold then it is not a kind of a trawler. sent23: the hickory does not integrate fluoroscopy. sent24: the livestock is not a Lythrum if the fact that the nut is a Lythrum and does not integrate fluoroscopy is not correct. sent25: there is something such that it rebuilds.
sent18 & sent15 -> int1: the hickory is not salty.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the livestock is both a Lythrum and a trident is incorrect.; sent1 -> int3: the livestock does not integrate fluoroscopy if that it is both a Lythrum and a trident is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the livestock does not integrate fluoroscopy.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the nut is not a trawler.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the calamint does not snooze.
sent22 -> int6: the dolphin is not a trawler if the fact that it is splenic and/or it is hydrostatics does not hold.; sent25 & sent12 -> int7: the substitute is not cursorial or it does not mystify subculture or both.; int7 -> int8: something either is not cursorial or does not mystify subculture or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the calamint snoozes is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is a Lythrum and is a trident is not correct it does not integrate fluoroscopy. sent2: if the hickory does not snooze and does not overburden luciferin then the calamint does not snooze. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not salty the hickory is not a trawler. sent4: the fact that the livestock is salty and it is a trident is wrong. sent5: if the Punjabi is not cursorial then the fact that the dolphin is splenic and/or is hydrostatics is not right. sent6: the fact that the calamint overburdens luciferin is correct. sent7: the fact that the nut is a Lythrum but it does not integrate fluoroscopy is not correct if the dolphin is not a kind of a trawler. sent8: that the livestock is a kind of a Lythrum and it is a kind of a trident is wrong if the hickory is not salty. sent9: if the nut is not a trawler the calamint snoozes. sent10: the livestock does overburden luciferin. sent11: if the livestock is not a kind of a Lythrum that it does not integrate fluoroscopy is not incorrect. sent12: if there exists something such that it does rebuild the substitute either is not cursorial or does not mystify subculture or both. sent13: if the livestock does not integrate fluoroscopy then the nut is not a kind of a trawler. sent14: if something is not a Lythrum then it does not integrate fluoroscopy. sent15: the hickory is not salty if something does not overburden luciferin. sent16: if the calamint does not integrate fluoroscopy then it does not snooze. sent17: the hickory is a kind of a trident and it is not non-salty if the livestock is not a Lythrum. sent18: something does not overburden luciferin. sent19: something is not a kind of a pick if the fact that it is a aspergill and a nephrology is false. sent20: the fact that the nut is salty and it is a trawler does not hold if the fact that the livestock is not a Lythrum hold. sent21: that the fact that the livestock is a Lythrum and it is salty is not false is wrong. sent22: if the fact that something is splenic and/or it is hydrostatics does not hold then it is not a kind of a trawler. sent23: the hickory does not integrate fluoroscopy. sent24: the livestock is not a Lythrum if the fact that the nut is a Lythrum and does not integrate fluoroscopy is not correct. sent25: there is something such that it rebuilds. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent15 -> int1: the hickory is not salty.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the livestock is both a Lythrum and a trident is incorrect.; sent1 -> int3: the livestock does not integrate fluoroscopy if that it is both a Lythrum and a trident is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the livestock does not integrate fluoroscopy.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the nut is not a trawler.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__