the fact that the chauffeur does not trivialize Umayyad but it is a command does not hold.
sent1: if the chauffeur is not a BMDO and it is not antheridial then that it is not antagonistic is not false. sent2: the chauffeur is not a BMDO and it is not antheridial if it is luteal. sent3: that the whiptail is a kind of non-geophytic thing that is not a calligraphy is wrong if it is a Keaton. sent4: that the fact that the creator is a kind of a bobcat that is an emancipation is true is not true if that there is something such that it is not a bobcat is not incorrect. sent5: the whiptail is a bromine and is a phenolic if the periwinkle is not a bobcat. sent6: if something that is not an emancipation is not geophytic it is not a bobcat. sent7: that the whiptail is a Keaton is true. sent8: the fact that the marsh is not antheridial but it knits Woolworth is not right if there is something such that it does not knits Woolworth. sent9: if the periwinkle is not a calligraphy then it is both not an emancipation and not geophytic. sent10: if that the chauffeur is not antagonistic is not wrong then the marsh is not a jib and not antagonistic. sent11: if that something is a bobcat and it is an emancipation is incorrect it is not a phenolic. sent12: if something is a bromine the fact that the club-head does command and it does trivialize Umayyad is incorrect. sent13: the marsh is not luteal if something is not antagonistic. sent14: that that the chauffeur is a kind of antagonistic thing that knits Woolworth is not correct is right if there is something such that it is not luteal. sent15: if something is a jib then the stooper is not luteal. sent16: if something is not luteal then the fact that it does not trivialize Umayyad and is a command does not hold. sent17: the periwinkle is not a kind of a calligraphy. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that that it is a kind of a command and trivializes Umayyad is not incorrect is incorrect the fact that the creator is a jib is not incorrect. sent19: if the fact that something is not non-antagonistic and does knit Woolworth is false it does not knit Woolworth. sent20: the club-head is not a bobcat if there is something such that the fact that it is not geophytic and it is not a kind of a calligraphy is not true. sent21: that the clinometer does not trivialize Umayyad and does theme prick does not hold. sent22: the chauffeur is not antheridial. sent23: if the creator is not a phenolic the fact that the stooper is a jib and is not a bromine does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chauffeur is luteal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the chauffeur is not a BMDO and it is not antheridial.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the chauffeur is not antagonistic.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the marsh is both not a jib and antagonistic.; sent16 -> int4: if the chauffeur is not luteal then that it does not trivialize Umayyad and it is a command is not true.;
the chauffeur does not trivialize Umayyad but it is a command.
sent11 -> int5: if the fact that the creator is a kind of a bobcat that is an emancipation does not hold then it is not a phenolic.; sent3 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the whiptail is non-geophytic thing that is not a calligraphy is not right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-geophytic and it is not a calligraphy is not correct.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: the club-head is not a bobcat.; int8 -> int9: something is not a bobcat.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the fact that the creator is a bobcat that is a kind of an emancipation is not correct.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the creator is not a phenolic.; sent23 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the stooper is both a jib and not a bromine is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chauffeur does not trivialize Umayyad but it is a command does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chauffeur is not a BMDO and it is not antheridial then that it is not antagonistic is not false. sent2: the chauffeur is not a BMDO and it is not antheridial if it is luteal. sent3: that the whiptail is a kind of non-geophytic thing that is not a calligraphy is wrong if it is a Keaton. sent4: that the fact that the creator is a kind of a bobcat that is an emancipation is true is not true if that there is something such that it is not a bobcat is not incorrect. sent5: the whiptail is a bromine and is a phenolic if the periwinkle is not a bobcat. sent6: if something that is not an emancipation is not geophytic it is not a bobcat. sent7: that the whiptail is a Keaton is true. sent8: the fact that the marsh is not antheridial but it knits Woolworth is not right if there is something such that it does not knits Woolworth. sent9: if the periwinkle is not a calligraphy then it is both not an emancipation and not geophytic. sent10: if that the chauffeur is not antagonistic is not wrong then the marsh is not a jib and not antagonistic. sent11: if that something is a bobcat and it is an emancipation is incorrect it is not a phenolic. sent12: if something is a bromine the fact that the club-head does command and it does trivialize Umayyad is incorrect. sent13: the marsh is not luteal if something is not antagonistic. sent14: that that the chauffeur is a kind of antagonistic thing that knits Woolworth is not correct is right if there is something such that it is not luteal. sent15: if something is a jib then the stooper is not luteal. sent16: if something is not luteal then the fact that it does not trivialize Umayyad and is a command does not hold. sent17: the periwinkle is not a kind of a calligraphy. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that that it is a kind of a command and trivializes Umayyad is not incorrect is incorrect the fact that the creator is a jib is not incorrect. sent19: if the fact that something is not non-antagonistic and does knit Woolworth is false it does not knit Woolworth. sent20: the club-head is not a bobcat if there is something such that the fact that it is not geophytic and it is not a kind of a calligraphy is not true. sent21: that the clinometer does not trivialize Umayyad and does theme prick does not hold. sent22: the chauffeur is not antheridial. sent23: if the creator is not a phenolic the fact that the stooper is a jib and is not a bromine does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chauffeur is luteal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the chauffeur is not a BMDO and it is not antheridial.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the chauffeur is not antagonistic.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the marsh is both not a jib and antagonistic.; sent16 -> int4: if the chauffeur is not luteal then that it does not trivialize Umayyad and it is a command is not true.; __UNKNOWN__