the fact that that the buttercrunch is non-aperiodic thing that abuses pregnanediol does not hold if the Methodist is a kind of a whippet is false.
sent1: the buttercrunch does not widen if it is tubeless and it buries fluoride. sent2: something is stagflationary but not a trek if it is not a kind of a whippet. sent3: the fluoride is not a whippet if the fact that the Methodist is both a nonpareil and a whippet is wrong. sent4: the pregnanediol is not a trek if something is not a jolt. sent5: that the buttercrunch is aperiodic and it abuses pregnanediol does not hold if the pregnanediol is not aperiodic. sent6: the pregnanediol does deplume and is not a trek if there exists something such that it does not jolt. sent7: the fact that the buttercrunch is not aperiodic but it abuses pregnanediol is not correct if that the pregnanediol is not aperiodic hold. sent8: if the pregnanediol is not aperiodic then the buttercrunch is not aperiodic but it abuses pregnanediol. sent9: if the Methodist is a kind of a whippet then the buttercrunch is not aperiodic but it abuses pregnanediol. sent10: if something is a nonpareil then that it buries sapphire is not false. sent11: that the buttercrunch is a kind of aperiodic thing that does abuse pregnanediol is wrong. sent12: the Methodist does not abuse wait. sent13: if the Methodist is a whippet it does not abuse wait and it does widen. sent14: there exists something such that it is not unpreventable. sent15: there exists something such that it does jolt. sent16: the buttercrunch is not aperiodic and abuses pregnanediol. sent17: the pregnanediol does not bury sapphire if the buttercrunch deplumes. sent18: there is something such that it does not abuse wait. sent19: if the Methodist is a whippet then the fact that the buttercrunch is aperiodic and abuses pregnanediol is wrong. sent20: the pregnanediol is a nonpareil if something that abuses wait does widen. sent21: something that does bury sapphire and deplumes is not aperiodic. sent22: the pregnanediol is not a trek. sent23: the Methodist does not abuse wait if it is a whippet. sent24: if there exists something such that it does not abuse wait and it does widen the pregnanediol is a nonpareil. sent25: the icebreaker does not jolt.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Methodist is a kind of a whippet.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Methodist does not abuse wait but it does widen.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not abuse wait and does widen.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the pregnanediol is a kind of a nonpareil.; sent10 -> int4: if the pregnanediol is a nonpareil it does bury sapphire.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pregnanediol buries sapphire.; sent25 -> int6: something does not jolt.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the pregnanediol deplumes but it does not trek.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the pregnanediol does deplume is not wrong.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the pregnanediol does bury sapphire and does deplume.; sent21 -> int10: that the pregnanediol is not aperiodic is not wrong if it buries sapphire and deplumes.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the pregnanediol is not aperiodic.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the fact that the buttercrunch is a kind of non-aperiodic thing that does abuse pregnanediol is not true.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fluoride is stagflationary and not a trek.
sent2 -> int13: the fluoride is both stagflationary and not a trek if it is not a whippet.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the buttercrunch is non-aperiodic thing that abuses pregnanediol does not hold if the Methodist is a kind of a whippet is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the buttercrunch does not widen if it is tubeless and it buries fluoride. sent2: something is stagflationary but not a trek if it is not a kind of a whippet. sent3: the fluoride is not a whippet if the fact that the Methodist is both a nonpareil and a whippet is wrong. sent4: the pregnanediol is not a trek if something is not a jolt. sent5: that the buttercrunch is aperiodic and it abuses pregnanediol does not hold if the pregnanediol is not aperiodic. sent6: the pregnanediol does deplume and is not a trek if there exists something such that it does not jolt. sent7: the fact that the buttercrunch is not aperiodic but it abuses pregnanediol is not correct if that the pregnanediol is not aperiodic hold. sent8: if the pregnanediol is not aperiodic then the buttercrunch is not aperiodic but it abuses pregnanediol. sent9: if the Methodist is a kind of a whippet then the buttercrunch is not aperiodic but it abuses pregnanediol. sent10: if something is a nonpareil then that it buries sapphire is not false. sent11: that the buttercrunch is a kind of aperiodic thing that does abuse pregnanediol is wrong. sent12: the Methodist does not abuse wait. sent13: if the Methodist is a whippet it does not abuse wait and it does widen. sent14: there exists something such that it is not unpreventable. sent15: there exists something such that it does jolt. sent16: the buttercrunch is not aperiodic and abuses pregnanediol. sent17: the pregnanediol does not bury sapphire if the buttercrunch deplumes. sent18: there is something such that it does not abuse wait. sent19: if the Methodist is a whippet then the fact that the buttercrunch is aperiodic and abuses pregnanediol is wrong. sent20: the pregnanediol is a nonpareil if something that abuses wait does widen. sent21: something that does bury sapphire and deplumes is not aperiodic. sent22: the pregnanediol is not a trek. sent23: the Methodist does not abuse wait if it is a whippet. sent24: if there exists something such that it does not abuse wait and it does widen the pregnanediol is a nonpareil. sent25: the icebreaker does not jolt. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Methodist is a kind of a whippet.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Methodist does not abuse wait but it does widen.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not abuse wait and does widen.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the pregnanediol is a kind of a nonpareil.; sent10 -> int4: if the pregnanediol is a nonpareil it does bury sapphire.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pregnanediol buries sapphire.; sent25 -> int6: something does not jolt.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the pregnanediol deplumes but it does not trek.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the pregnanediol does deplume is not wrong.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the pregnanediol does bury sapphire and does deplume.; sent21 -> int10: that the pregnanediol is not aperiodic is not wrong if it buries sapphire and deplumes.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the pregnanediol is not aperiodic.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the fact that the buttercrunch is a kind of non-aperiodic thing that does abuse pregnanediol is not true.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__