the puddling and the actinomorphicness happens.
sent1: the refuting inexpensiveness does not occur. sent2: the actinomorphicness occurs if the competition does not occur. sent3: that the zoom happens is not incorrect. sent4: the mercurialness does not occur. sent5: if that the parodying does not occur and/or the isomorphousness does not occur is not true the flicking inexpensiveness does not occur. sent6: the visiting occurs. sent7: if the replacement does not occur then that the parodying does not occur or the isomorphousness does not occur or both is false. sent8: that the bicipitalness and the inhumaneness happens is brought about by the non-generalness. sent9: if the set occurs the actinomorphicness happens. sent10: if the visiting does not occur then the competition and the spicateness happens. sent11: if the puddling happens that the zoom and the non-Ukrainianness happens is wrong. sent12: if the bicipitalness happens and the metaphysicalness occurs the Manx does not occur. sent13: the actinomorphicness happens. sent14: the unyoking but not the replacement occurs if the inhumaneness occurs. sent15: that the ordinance does not occur but the competition occurs is brought about by that the visiting does not occur. sent16: the zoom does not occur if the Ukrainian does not occur. sent17: either the set or the Tajikistaniness or both occurs if the flicking inexpensiveness does not occur. sent18: the refuting paraplegia happens and the chertiness happens. sent19: if the competition does not occur then the puddle happens and the actinomorphicness happens. sent20: the bruxism happens and the rotation occurs. sent21: if the competition happens and the visiting occurs then the Ukrainian does not occur. sent22: both the cycling and the varnishing towpath happens. sent23: the flicking inexpensiveness occurs. sent24: the heterotrophicness does not occur. sent25: the flicking marcher occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the competition occurs.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the competition and the visiting happens.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the Ukrainian does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the zoom does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the competition does not occur.; int5 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the ordinance does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the puddling and the actinomorphicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the refuting inexpensiveness does not occur. sent2: the actinomorphicness occurs if the competition does not occur. sent3: that the zoom happens is not incorrect. sent4: the mercurialness does not occur. sent5: if that the parodying does not occur and/or the isomorphousness does not occur is not true the flicking inexpensiveness does not occur. sent6: the visiting occurs. sent7: if the replacement does not occur then that the parodying does not occur or the isomorphousness does not occur or both is false. sent8: that the bicipitalness and the inhumaneness happens is brought about by the non-generalness. sent9: if the set occurs the actinomorphicness happens. sent10: if the visiting does not occur then the competition and the spicateness happens. sent11: if the puddling happens that the zoom and the non-Ukrainianness happens is wrong. sent12: if the bicipitalness happens and the metaphysicalness occurs the Manx does not occur. sent13: the actinomorphicness happens. sent14: the unyoking but not the replacement occurs if the inhumaneness occurs. sent15: that the ordinance does not occur but the competition occurs is brought about by that the visiting does not occur. sent16: the zoom does not occur if the Ukrainian does not occur. sent17: either the set or the Tajikistaniness or both occurs if the flicking inexpensiveness does not occur. sent18: the refuting paraplegia happens and the chertiness happens. sent19: if the competition does not occur then the puddle happens and the actinomorphicness happens. sent20: the bruxism happens and the rotation occurs. sent21: if the competition happens and the visiting occurs then the Ukrainian does not occur. sent22: both the cycling and the varnishing towpath happens. sent23: the flicking inexpensiveness occurs. sent24: the heterotrophicness does not occur. sent25: the flicking marcher occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the competition occurs.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the competition and the visiting happens.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the Ukrainian does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the zoom does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the competition does not occur.; int5 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__