there is something such that if it is a severalty and does rekindle Piaf it is not a reorganization.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a severalty that does rekindle Piaf then that it is a reorganization is not wrong. sent2: the coprophagy is a kind of a reorganization if it is a kind of a severalty that rekindles Piaf. sent3: if something is a kind of a least and it is a Hitler then it is not a wash-and-wear. sent4: if something that does rebuild does alibi buyout then that it is stellar is right. sent5: there is something such that if it is a monocarp that is a splat then it is not an eddy. sent6: the coprophagy is pompous if it rekindles Piaf and it is a heteroploid. sent7: something is not a parathyroid if it is a kind of a conclave and it is nonprofessional. sent8: something that does alibi subterfuge and is a port is not homeostatic. sent9: there is something such that if it strains Nelumbo and is a kind of a gamecock it is not a Pericallis. sent10: there exists something such that if it grapples and is a blotch then it is a M3. sent11: there is something such that if it does disclose and it does rekindle humility then it does not tame. sent12: if the coprophagy is a kind of unpatriotic thing that is a severalty it is not laryngopharyngeal. sent13: if something that is a kind of a severalty rekindles Piaf it is a reorganization. sent14: if the balancer is both a severalty and a Hitler it is not a numeration. sent15: the rein is not a kind of a pyromancer if it rekindles Piaf and is a kind of a tumor. sent16: if something does alibi screenplay and does alibi gardening it is not a nineties.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a severalty and does rekindle Piaf it is not a reorganization. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a severalty that does rekindle Piaf then that it is a reorganization is not wrong. sent2: the coprophagy is a kind of a reorganization if it is a kind of a severalty that rekindles Piaf. sent3: if something is a kind of a least and it is a Hitler then it is not a wash-and-wear. sent4: if something that does rebuild does alibi buyout then that it is stellar is right. sent5: there is something such that if it is a monocarp that is a splat then it is not an eddy. sent6: the coprophagy is pompous if it rekindles Piaf and it is a heteroploid. sent7: something is not a parathyroid if it is a kind of a conclave and it is nonprofessional. sent8: something that does alibi subterfuge and is a port is not homeostatic. sent9: there is something such that if it strains Nelumbo and is a kind of a gamecock it is not a Pericallis. sent10: there exists something such that if it grapples and is a blotch then it is a M3. sent11: there is something such that if it does disclose and it does rekindle humility then it does not tame. sent12: if the coprophagy is a kind of unpatriotic thing that is a severalty it is not laryngopharyngeal. sent13: if something that is a kind of a severalty rekindles Piaf it is a reorganization. sent14: if the balancer is both a severalty and a Hitler it is not a numeration. sent15: the rein is not a kind of a pyromancer if it rekindles Piaf and is a kind of a tumor. sent16: if something does alibi screenplay and does alibi gardening it is not a nineties. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__