the councilman is a trillion.
sent1: that the jamb is a cage that does not fracture photochemistry is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the acetate does fracture pawer is true. sent3: if the fact that the pothole is not a trillion is not false then the handlebar is a cage and it does service aeroembolism. sent4: the handle is a look if the handlebar does service aeroembolism. sent5: if the fact that the handlebar is over-the-counter is not false then it is a scrum. sent6: if the pothole fractures pawer the handle does cage. sent7: the handlebar is a scrum if that it is not over-the-counter and it does not look does not hold. sent8: something does not fracture pawer and it is not a trillion if it is not a scrum. sent9: the handlebar is not over-the-counter. sent10: if the pothole does not fracture photochemistry the handlebar is not a cage. sent11: the handle is not a cage if that the jamb cage is incorrect. sent12: the fact that something salts but it does not fracture photochemistry is not right if it fractures pawer. sent13: if the handlebar services aeroembolism that the councilman is a kind of a trillion is true. sent14: the handlebar is not over-the-counter if that the pothole is over-the-counter and does not fracture pawer is not true. sent15: if the fact that the handle is a kind of non-maleficent thing that is a kind of a drumbeat is not correct the pothole is not a trillion. sent16: if the handlebar is a kind of a scrum but it does not service aeroembolism the councilman is not a scrum. sent17: something is a scrum and does not service aeroembolism if it is not a kind of a cage. sent18: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a drumbeat is right. sent19: the handlebar services aeroembolism if it is over-the-counter thing that is not a look. sent20: if the handlebar is a scrum the pothole does fracture pawer. sent21: the handlebar services aeroembolism if the fact that it is both not over-the-counter and not a look is true. sent22: that the handlebar is over-the-counter and is not a look is incorrect. sent23: the fact that the handlebar is over-the-counter but it does not cage is not true. sent24: if that the jamb does cage and does not fracture photochemistry is not correct the handle is not a cage.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the handlebar is non-over-the-counter thing that is not a look is false.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the handlebar is a scrum.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the pothole fractures pawer.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the handle is a kind of a cage.; sent24 & sent1 -> int4: the handle is not a cage.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the handlebar is non-over-the-counter thing that is not a kind of a look.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the handlebar services aeroembolism.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the junkie is a salting but it does not fracture photochemistry does not hold.
sent12 -> int8: that the junkie is a salting but it does not fracture photochemistry is not right if it does fracture pawer.;
$hypothesis$ = the councilman is a trillion. ; $context$ = sent1: that the jamb is a cage that does not fracture photochemistry is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the acetate does fracture pawer is true. sent3: if the fact that the pothole is not a trillion is not false then the handlebar is a cage and it does service aeroembolism. sent4: the handle is a look if the handlebar does service aeroembolism. sent5: if the fact that the handlebar is over-the-counter is not false then it is a scrum. sent6: if the pothole fractures pawer the handle does cage. sent7: the handlebar is a scrum if that it is not over-the-counter and it does not look does not hold. sent8: something does not fracture pawer and it is not a trillion if it is not a scrum. sent9: the handlebar is not over-the-counter. sent10: if the pothole does not fracture photochemistry the handlebar is not a cage. sent11: the handle is not a cage if that the jamb cage is incorrect. sent12: the fact that something salts but it does not fracture photochemistry is not right if it fractures pawer. sent13: if the handlebar services aeroembolism that the councilman is a kind of a trillion is true. sent14: the handlebar is not over-the-counter if that the pothole is over-the-counter and does not fracture pawer is not true. sent15: if the fact that the handle is a kind of non-maleficent thing that is a kind of a drumbeat is not correct the pothole is not a trillion. sent16: if the handlebar is a kind of a scrum but it does not service aeroembolism the councilman is not a scrum. sent17: something is a scrum and does not service aeroembolism if it is not a kind of a cage. sent18: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a drumbeat is right. sent19: the handlebar services aeroembolism if it is over-the-counter thing that is not a look. sent20: if the handlebar is a scrum the pothole does fracture pawer. sent21: the handlebar services aeroembolism if the fact that it is both not over-the-counter and not a look is true. sent22: that the handlebar is over-the-counter and is not a look is incorrect. sent23: the fact that the handlebar is over-the-counter but it does not cage is not true. sent24: if that the jamb does cage and does not fracture photochemistry is not correct the handle is not a cage. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the handlebar is non-over-the-counter thing that is not a look is false.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the handlebar is a scrum.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the pothole fractures pawer.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the handle is a kind of a cage.; sent24 & sent1 -> int4: the handle is not a cage.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the handlebar is non-over-the-counter thing that is not a kind of a look.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the handlebar services aeroembolism.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__