the fact that the slam occurs and the narrating complaint occurs does not hold.
sent1: the impersonation happens. sent2: the binding grog does not occur. sent3: the slam happens if the registration occurs and the narrating VHF does not occur. sent4: the narrating complaint and the divestiture occurs if the binding grog does not occur. sent5: the registration occurs and the narrating VHF does not occur if the impersonation happens.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the registration happens but the narrating VHF does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the slamming occurs.; sent4 & sent2 -> int3: the narrating complaint occurs and the divestiture occurs.; int3 -> int4: the narrating complaint occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the slam occurs and the narrating complaint occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the impersonation happens. sent2: the binding grog does not occur. sent3: the slam happens if the registration occurs and the narrating VHF does not occur. sent4: the narrating complaint and the divestiture occurs if the binding grog does not occur. sent5: the registration occurs and the narrating VHF does not occur if the impersonation happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the registration happens but the narrating VHF does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the slamming occurs.; sent4 & sent2 -> int3: the narrating complaint occurs and the divestiture occurs.; int3 -> int4: the narrating complaint occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__