that the abutter does not pan celioscopy is not incorrect.
sent1: that something is non-ferric thing that is not a Brule is wrong if it is not a kind of a Narcissus. sent2: the subdeacon is not a Narcissus if it is exodontic. sent3: if the subdeacon is not a presupposition then the fact that it does vex Horace and it does not pan celioscopy is incorrect. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not exodontic then the fact that the enumerator is a kind of a Narcissus and is not a toolmaker is wrong. sent5: the subdeacon is not backless. sent6: the subdeacon is a parapet. sent7: the fact that the subdeacon is not ferric but it is a Brule does not hold. sent8: the fact that if the laminate is sobering and/or it is the rover the laminate is not a kind of a Brule is true. sent9: the subdeacon is a kind of a pyrophosphate if it is a kind of a toolmaker. sent10: the fact that the XX is exodontic and it is a dribbler is not right if the fact that it does not decorate caulked hold. sent11: the XX does not decorate caulked. sent12: the pawn is not exodontic if there is something such that the fact that that it is exodontic and it is a kind of a dribbler is not false is wrong. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is not ferric and it is not a kind of a Brule is not right then the fact that the abutter does not pan celioscopy is true. sent14: the durian is not a parapet. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not ferric and it is not a pyrophosphate is incorrect then the enumerator is a pyrophosphate. sent16: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Brule that the fact that the piperazine is non-ferric and it is not a pyrophosphate is right is not true. sent17: if something does not vex overburden then the fact that it does not sojourn and it is putrid is false. sent18: that the subdeacon is ferric but it is not a Brule is false. sent19: something is a toolmaker if the fact that it is a parapet is not false. sent20: something is a kind of a toolmaker if that it is a Narcissus and it is not a toolmaker is not true. sent21: if the subdeacon is a kind of a pyrophosphate it is exodontic. sent22: if something is not exodontic the fact that it is a toolmaker and is not a parapet does not hold. sent23: the laminate does sober. sent24: if something is a toolmaker it is a kind of a parapet.
sent19 -> int1: the subdeacon is a toolmaker if it is a parapet.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the subdeacon is a kind of a toolmaker.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the subdeacon is a pyrophosphate.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the subdeacon is exodontic.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the subdeacon is not a kind of a Narcissus.; sent1 -> int6: that the subdeacon is not ferric and is not a Brule does not hold if it is not a Narcissus.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the subdeacon is non-ferric and it is not a Brule is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not ferric and is not a Brule is not correct.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the abutter does pan celioscopy.
sent23 -> int9: the fact that the laminate sobers or is a rover or both is not wrong.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the laminate is not a Brule.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not a Brule.; int11 & sent16 -> int12: the fact that the piperazine is not ferric and it is not a pyrophosphate does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is not ferric and it is not a pyrophosphate is false.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the enumerator is a kind of a pyrophosphate.; sent24 -> int15: if the enumerator is a toolmaker it is a parapet.; sent20 -> int16: the enumerator is a toolmaker if the fact that it is a Narcissus and it is not a toolmaker is not true.; sent10 & sent11 -> int17: the fact that the XX is exodontic and it does dribble is incorrect.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it is exodontic and it does dribble is not right.; int18 & sent12 -> int19: the pawn is not exodontic.; int19 -> int20: something is not exodontic.; int20 & sent4 -> int21: that the enumerator is a Narcissus but it is not a toolmaker is incorrect.; int16 & int21 -> int22: the enumerator is a toolmaker.; int15 & int22 -> int23: the enumerator is a parapet.; int14 & int23 -> int24: the enumerator is a kind of a pyrophosphate and is a parapet.; int24 -> int25: there is something such that it is a pyrophosphate and it is a parapet.;
$hypothesis$ = that the abutter does not pan celioscopy is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is non-ferric thing that is not a Brule is wrong if it is not a kind of a Narcissus. sent2: the subdeacon is not a Narcissus if it is exodontic. sent3: if the subdeacon is not a presupposition then the fact that it does vex Horace and it does not pan celioscopy is incorrect. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not exodontic then the fact that the enumerator is a kind of a Narcissus and is not a toolmaker is wrong. sent5: the subdeacon is not backless. sent6: the subdeacon is a parapet. sent7: the fact that the subdeacon is not ferric but it is a Brule does not hold. sent8: the fact that if the laminate is sobering and/or it is the rover the laminate is not a kind of a Brule is true. sent9: the subdeacon is a kind of a pyrophosphate if it is a kind of a toolmaker. sent10: the fact that the XX is exodontic and it is a dribbler is not right if the fact that it does not decorate caulked hold. sent11: the XX does not decorate caulked. sent12: the pawn is not exodontic if there is something such that the fact that that it is exodontic and it is a kind of a dribbler is not false is wrong. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is not ferric and it is not a kind of a Brule is not right then the fact that the abutter does not pan celioscopy is true. sent14: the durian is not a parapet. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not ferric and it is not a pyrophosphate is incorrect then the enumerator is a pyrophosphate. sent16: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Brule that the fact that the piperazine is non-ferric and it is not a pyrophosphate is right is not true. sent17: if something does not vex overburden then the fact that it does not sojourn and it is putrid is false. sent18: that the subdeacon is ferric but it is not a Brule is false. sent19: something is a toolmaker if the fact that it is a parapet is not false. sent20: something is a kind of a toolmaker if that it is a Narcissus and it is not a toolmaker is not true. sent21: if the subdeacon is a kind of a pyrophosphate it is exodontic. sent22: if something is not exodontic the fact that it is a toolmaker and is not a parapet does not hold. sent23: the laminate does sober. sent24: if something is a toolmaker it is a kind of a parapet. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the subdeacon is a toolmaker if it is a parapet.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the subdeacon is a kind of a toolmaker.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the subdeacon is a pyrophosphate.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the subdeacon is exodontic.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the subdeacon is not a kind of a Narcissus.; sent1 -> int6: that the subdeacon is not ferric and is not a Brule does not hold if it is not a Narcissus.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the subdeacon is non-ferric and it is not a Brule is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not ferric and is not a Brule is not correct.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__