the slammer is a kind of a sublimation.
sent1: if the psychophysicist does not consort slammer the fact that the VAT is anterograde is right. sent2: there is something such that it does not jockey twenty. sent3: if something is a fourth then it is cardiopulmonary. sent4: the slammer is not a sublimation if something either consorts adjuster or is anterograde or both. sent5: if the slammer is cardiopulmonary the VAT is a sublimation. sent6: the slammer consorts surfer and it is a fourth if there exists something such that it does not jockey twenty. sent7: the slammer is not a sublimation if there is something such that it does consort adjuster. sent8: the psychophysicist is a unanimity and does not consort Sardinian. sent9: if the psychophysicist is a sublimation the slammer is a sublimation. sent10: the psychophysicist does not consort slammer if it is a unanimity that does not consort Sardinian. sent11: that the Sardinian consorts adjuster and/or does not consort slammer does not hold if that it is not cardiopulmonary is true. sent12: something is a sublimation if the fact that it is both not anterograde and not a sublimation is incorrect.
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the psychophysicist does not consort slammer is not incorrect.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the VAT is anterograde.; int2 -> int3: the VAT consorts adjuster and/or is anterograde.; int3 -> int4: either something does consort adjuster or it is not non-anterograde or both.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the adjuster does not consort adjuster.
sent3 -> int5: the slammer is cardiopulmonary if it is a fourth.; sent2 & sent6 -> int6: the slammer does consort surfer and is a fourth.; int6 -> int7: the slammer is a fourth.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the slammer is cardiopulmonary.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the VAT is a sublimation.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it is a sublimation is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the slammer is a kind of a sublimation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the psychophysicist does not consort slammer the fact that the VAT is anterograde is right. sent2: there is something such that it does not jockey twenty. sent3: if something is a fourth then it is cardiopulmonary. sent4: the slammer is not a sublimation if something either consorts adjuster or is anterograde or both. sent5: if the slammer is cardiopulmonary the VAT is a sublimation. sent6: the slammer consorts surfer and it is a fourth if there exists something such that it does not jockey twenty. sent7: the slammer is not a sublimation if there is something such that it does consort adjuster. sent8: the psychophysicist is a unanimity and does not consort Sardinian. sent9: if the psychophysicist is a sublimation the slammer is a sublimation. sent10: the psychophysicist does not consort slammer if it is a unanimity that does not consort Sardinian. sent11: that the Sardinian consorts adjuster and/or does not consort slammer does not hold if that it is not cardiopulmonary is true. sent12: something is a sublimation if the fact that it is both not anterograde and not a sublimation is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the psychophysicist does not consort slammer is not incorrect.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the VAT is anterograde.; int2 -> int3: the VAT consorts adjuster and/or is anterograde.; int3 -> int4: either something does consort adjuster or it is not non-anterograde or both.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__