the TLC but not the reopening occurs.
sent1: both the malfunctioning and the gossip happens. sent2: if the irrational does not occur the fact that the TLC but not the reopening occurs does not hold. sent3: the revenging Ceryle occurs. sent4: the irreverence does not occur. sent5: the TLC happens. sent6: the dietary occurs. sent7: the irrationalness and the dietariness happens. sent8: if both the abasicness and the aecialness occurs the fact that the reopening does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that the non-abasicness and the aecialness occurs is incorrect if the revenging Ceryle does not occur. sent10: if the glandularness happens the revenging Snow happens. sent11: if the philately happens then the abasicness occurs. sent12: both the aecialness and the revenging Ceryle happens. sent13: that the philately happens is triggered by the irrational. sent14: the professional occurs. sent15: that the superhumanness occurs is prevented by that the phacoemulsification occurs and the homosexualness happens.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the irrationalness happens hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the philately occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the abasicness occurs is not incorrect.; sent12 -> int4: the aecialness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the abasicness occurs and the aecialness occurs.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the reopening does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the TLC but not the reopening happens is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the TLC but not the reopening occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: both the malfunctioning and the gossip happens. sent2: if the irrational does not occur the fact that the TLC but not the reopening occurs does not hold. sent3: the revenging Ceryle occurs. sent4: the irreverence does not occur. sent5: the TLC happens. sent6: the dietary occurs. sent7: the irrationalness and the dietariness happens. sent8: if both the abasicness and the aecialness occurs the fact that the reopening does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that the non-abasicness and the aecialness occurs is incorrect if the revenging Ceryle does not occur. sent10: if the glandularness happens the revenging Snow happens. sent11: if the philately happens then the abasicness occurs. sent12: both the aecialness and the revenging Ceryle happens. sent13: that the philately happens is triggered by the irrational. sent14: the professional occurs. sent15: that the superhumanness occurs is prevented by that the phacoemulsification occurs and the homosexualness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the irrationalness happens hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the philately occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the abasicness occurs is not incorrect.; sent12 -> int4: the aecialness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the abasicness occurs and the aecialness occurs.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the reopening does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__