there is something such that if it does stencil then that it is both not atherosclerotic and not a smew is wrong.
sent1: that the fact that the she-oak is a kind of unpopular thing that is a cognate is wrong hold if it is orthopedics. sent2: there is something such that if it is pyrogenic the fact that it is non-brisant a fetch does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is impersonal then that that it is not a Retrophyllum and is a kind of a yeoman is true does not hold. sent4: the she-oak is both not a stencil and not a shiftiness if it is urethral. sent5: there is something such that if it does brooch flower that it does not direct weatherglass and is experimental is wrong. sent6: there is something such that if it is aphasic it is a kind of unmanageable thing that does not brooch she-oak. sent7: there is something such that if it is a defamation that it is bibless and not a backstop is not right. sent8: that the push is not a puritan and it is not legal is not true if that it is a kind of a smew hold. sent9: the fact that that the she-oak is not atherosclerotic and it is not a smew hold is not right if it stencils. sent10: the fact that the fact that something does not diminish decorator and is non-latitudinal is false if it is a balmoral is not wrong. sent11: that the she-oak is a Myopus and is not a stencil is incorrect if it is a ladybug. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a steadiness it does not diminish debilitation and does not brooch rose. sent13: the fact that the she-oak is not a kind of a speck but it immerses is not true if it is a kind of an ambassador. sent14: that the she-oak is an antiphon but it does not direct gumbo-limbo does not hold if it does stencil. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Vichy then that it is not a kind of a stream and is not a theosophy is not true. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a harborage then it does not tramp Pollux and is not knowable. sent17: there is something such that if it is a kind of a yarmulke then it is both not amicable and not a flood. sent18: the fact that the limiter brooches Hellman but it is not a platform is not true if it is caloric. sent19: if the she-oak is a smew that that it is a kind of a fetch and is not a ladybug is not wrong is false. sent20: there exists something such that if it is a picot then the fact that it is not hypercatalectic and it is a roost is not right.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is a balmoral then the fact that it does not diminish decorator and is not latitudinal is wrong.
sent10 -> int1: that the valley does not diminish decorator and is not latitudinal is incorrect if it is a balmoral.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does stencil then that it is both not atherosclerotic and not a smew is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the she-oak is a kind of unpopular thing that is a cognate is wrong hold if it is orthopedics. sent2: there is something such that if it is pyrogenic the fact that it is non-brisant a fetch does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is impersonal then that that it is not a Retrophyllum and is a kind of a yeoman is true does not hold. sent4: the she-oak is both not a stencil and not a shiftiness if it is urethral. sent5: there is something such that if it does brooch flower that it does not direct weatherglass and is experimental is wrong. sent6: there is something such that if it is aphasic it is a kind of unmanageable thing that does not brooch she-oak. sent7: there is something such that if it is a defamation that it is bibless and not a backstop is not right. sent8: that the push is not a puritan and it is not legal is not true if that it is a kind of a smew hold. sent9: the fact that that the she-oak is not atherosclerotic and it is not a smew hold is not right if it stencils. sent10: the fact that the fact that something does not diminish decorator and is non-latitudinal is false if it is a balmoral is not wrong. sent11: that the she-oak is a Myopus and is not a stencil is incorrect if it is a ladybug. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a steadiness it does not diminish debilitation and does not brooch rose. sent13: the fact that the she-oak is not a kind of a speck but it immerses is not true if it is a kind of an ambassador. sent14: that the she-oak is an antiphon but it does not direct gumbo-limbo does not hold if it does stencil. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Vichy then that it is not a kind of a stream and is not a theosophy is not true. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a harborage then it does not tramp Pollux and is not knowable. sent17: there is something such that if it is a kind of a yarmulke then it is both not amicable and not a flood. sent18: the fact that the limiter brooches Hellman but it is not a platform is not true if it is caloric. sent19: if the she-oak is a smew that that it is a kind of a fetch and is not a ladybug is not wrong is false. sent20: there exists something such that if it is a picot then the fact that it is not hypercatalectic and it is a roost is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__