the touchscreen is a diaphoretic.
sent1: the fact that the touchscreen is not amaranthine is true if something is not a linecut and is not a indistinctness. sent2: if the foible does hop spill then it is both not a linecut and not a gecko. sent3: the touchscreen is not a diaphoretic if the fact that the rattrap is a kind of a sugar-bush is right. sent4: that that the rattrap is not a kind of a sugar-bush and it does not ladle velar is wrong is not false. sent5: the foible does hop spill. sent6: if something is not a kind of a Sumerian then the fact that it is not hydrostatics and does not ladle velar does not hold. sent7: if that the rattrap is not a sugar-bush and it does not ladle velar does not hold then the touchscreen is not diaphoretic. sent8: the foible is not a indistinctness. sent9: the touchscreen does not ladle velar. sent10: if the fact that something is a diaphoretic and amaranthine does not hold it is non-Sumerian.
sent7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the rattrap is non-hydrostatics thing that does not ladle velar is not right is not wrong.
sent6 -> int1: that the fact that the rattrap is not hydrostatics and it does not ladle velar is true does not hold if it is not Sumerian.; sent10 -> int2: the rattrap is not a Sumerian if that it is not non-diaphoretic and it is amaranthine does not hold.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the foible is not a linecut and it is not a gecko.; int3 -> int4: the foible is not a linecut.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the foible is not a linecut and it is not a indistinctness.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a linecut and is not a indistinctness.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the touchscreen is not amaranthine.; int7 -> int8: something is not amaranthine.;
$hypothesis$ = the touchscreen is a diaphoretic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the touchscreen is not amaranthine is true if something is not a linecut and is not a indistinctness. sent2: if the foible does hop spill then it is both not a linecut and not a gecko. sent3: the touchscreen is not a diaphoretic if the fact that the rattrap is a kind of a sugar-bush is right. sent4: that that the rattrap is not a kind of a sugar-bush and it does not ladle velar is wrong is not false. sent5: the foible does hop spill. sent6: if something is not a kind of a Sumerian then the fact that it is not hydrostatics and does not ladle velar does not hold. sent7: if that the rattrap is not a sugar-bush and it does not ladle velar does not hold then the touchscreen is not diaphoretic. sent8: the foible is not a indistinctness. sent9: the touchscreen does not ladle velar. sent10: if the fact that something is a diaphoretic and amaranthine does not hold it is non-Sumerian. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__