that either the rover is irrevocable or it does not concentrate or both is false.
sent1: if that the processing does concentrate hold then that the veld is entozoic or not a concentrate or both is not correct. sent2: the rover concentrates if the processing is a concentrates. sent3: if the veld is not irrevocable and it is not a concentrate the rover is entozoic. sent4: the rover is irrevocable or it is not a concentrate or both if the veld is unpunctual. sent5: the processing is irrevocable. sent6: the processing does concentrate if the veld is both entozoic and not diamantine. sent7: the veld is not entozoic. sent8: if something is non-femoral that it is a kind of a fizgig and does not top endodontist is not true. sent9: the coatdress is not an appeal. sent10: if that the peptone is a kind of non-femoral a buttercrunch is not correct then the Friesian is not femoral. sent11: if the streamer is avirulent then the peptone is avirulent. sent12: if the veld is not entozoic and it is not diamantine the processing is a concentrate. sent13: the fact that the rover is entozoic is correct if the veld is not a concentrate and it is not irrevocable. sent14: that something is a kind of non-femoral a buttercrunch is false if it is avirulent. sent15: the processing is not a cantaloupe and not a kirsch. sent16: if the coatdress is not an appeal the streamer is a swelling and it is not non-avirulent. sent17: the processing is both not a mustache and not diamantine. sent18: the veld is not entozoic and not diamantine. sent19: if the processing is not a kind of a concentrate but it is entozoic then the veld is irrevocable. sent20: the processing is not a kind of a fizgig if that the Friesian is a kind of a fizgig but it does not top endodontist is incorrect. sent21: the rover does concentrate.
sent12 & sent18 -> int1: the processing is a concentrate.;
the rover is irrevocable or not a concentrate or both.
sent8 -> int2: that the Friesian is a kind of a fizgig and does not top endodontist does not hold if it is not femoral.; sent14 -> int3: that the peptone is not femoral but it is a buttercrunch is false if it is avirulent.; sent16 & sent9 -> int4: the streamer does swell and it is avirulent.; int4 -> int5: the streamer is avirulent.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the peptone is avirulent.; int3 & int6 -> int7: that the peptone is a kind of non-femoral thing that is a buttercrunch is not right.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the Friesian is non-femoral.; int2 & int8 -> int9: that the Friesian is a kind of a fizgig but it does not top endodontist is not correct.; sent20 & int9 -> int10: the processing is not a kind of a fizgig.; int10 -> int11: the processing either is not a kind of a fizgig or does not grub limnology or both.; int11 -> int12: something is not a fizgig and/or it does not grub limnology.;
$hypothesis$ = that either the rover is irrevocable or it does not concentrate or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the processing does concentrate hold then that the veld is entozoic or not a concentrate or both is not correct. sent2: the rover concentrates if the processing is a concentrates. sent3: if the veld is not irrevocable and it is not a concentrate the rover is entozoic. sent4: the rover is irrevocable or it is not a concentrate or both if the veld is unpunctual. sent5: the processing is irrevocable. sent6: the processing does concentrate if the veld is both entozoic and not diamantine. sent7: the veld is not entozoic. sent8: if something is non-femoral that it is a kind of a fizgig and does not top endodontist is not true. sent9: the coatdress is not an appeal. sent10: if that the peptone is a kind of non-femoral a buttercrunch is not correct then the Friesian is not femoral. sent11: if the streamer is avirulent then the peptone is avirulent. sent12: if the veld is not entozoic and it is not diamantine the processing is a concentrate. sent13: the fact that the rover is entozoic is correct if the veld is not a concentrate and it is not irrevocable. sent14: that something is a kind of non-femoral a buttercrunch is false if it is avirulent. sent15: the processing is not a cantaloupe and not a kirsch. sent16: if the coatdress is not an appeal the streamer is a swelling and it is not non-avirulent. sent17: the processing is both not a mustache and not diamantine. sent18: the veld is not entozoic and not diamantine. sent19: if the processing is not a kind of a concentrate but it is entozoic then the veld is irrevocable. sent20: the processing is not a kind of a fizgig if that the Friesian is a kind of a fizgig but it does not top endodontist is incorrect. sent21: the rover does concentrate. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent18 -> int1: the processing is a concentrate.; __UNKNOWN__