that the reveille and the kismet happens if the ambassadorialness does not occur is not true.
sent1: if the euphoricness happens the holographicness occurs. sent2: if the fact that the besoting scupper does not occur and/or the subrogating Rallidae occurs is false the fact that the kismet occurs is right. sent3: the deputation happens and the re-creation happens. sent4: if the sortition does not occur the fact that the sentimentalizing does not occur and/or the potential happens is incorrect. sent5: the reveille and the besoting turntable happens. sent6: the euphoricness happens. sent7: the catechismalness does not occur. sent8: the flicker occurs. sent9: the subrogating atrophy occurs. sent10: if the fact that the ambassadorialness does not occur is true the fact that either the besoting scupper does not occur or the subrogating Rallidae happens or both is incorrect. sent11: that the fact that either the besoting scupper does not occur or the subrogating Rallidae occurs or both is false is not incorrect if the ambassadorialness occurs. sent12: if the ambassadorialness occurs both the reveille and the kismet happens. sent13: if the fact that the re-creation does not occur hold both the seepage and the lysogenizing audibility happens. sent14: the besoting turntable happens. sent15: the subrogating Rallidae does not occur. sent16: if the ambassadorialness does not occur then the subrogating Rallidae does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ambassadorialness does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the besoting scupper does not occur or the subrogating Rallidae happens or both is false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the kismet happens.; sent5 -> int3: the reveille occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the reveille and the kismet happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
both the holographicness and the sentimentalizing happens.
sent1 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the holographicness happens hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the reveille and the kismet happens if the ambassadorialness does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the euphoricness happens the holographicness occurs. sent2: if the fact that the besoting scupper does not occur and/or the subrogating Rallidae occurs is false the fact that the kismet occurs is right. sent3: the deputation happens and the re-creation happens. sent4: if the sortition does not occur the fact that the sentimentalizing does not occur and/or the potential happens is incorrect. sent5: the reveille and the besoting turntable happens. sent6: the euphoricness happens. sent7: the catechismalness does not occur. sent8: the flicker occurs. sent9: the subrogating atrophy occurs. sent10: if the fact that the ambassadorialness does not occur is true the fact that either the besoting scupper does not occur or the subrogating Rallidae happens or both is incorrect. sent11: that the fact that either the besoting scupper does not occur or the subrogating Rallidae occurs or both is false is not incorrect if the ambassadorialness occurs. sent12: if the ambassadorialness occurs both the reveille and the kismet happens. sent13: if the fact that the re-creation does not occur hold both the seepage and the lysogenizing audibility happens. sent14: the besoting turntable happens. sent15: the subrogating Rallidae does not occur. sent16: if the ambassadorialness does not occur then the subrogating Rallidae does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ambassadorialness does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the besoting scupper does not occur or the subrogating Rallidae happens or both is false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the kismet happens.; sent5 -> int3: the reveille occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the reveille and the kismet happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__