that there is something such that if the fact that it is not an intoxication and is a Urbana is not right then it is not chlorotic does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if that it does not teach and it is a Trevino is false it is a Malva. sent2: the fact that the mayfish does not deserve shittah if that the mayfish is repetitive an intoxication does not hold is true. sent3: the mayfish is not a retirement if it is not a kind of a Urbana. sent4: if that the mayfish is not a Khama and does resist echolocation is incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of an intoxication is correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is an intoxication it is not chlorotic. sent6: that the mayfish is not chlorotic is not incorrect if that it is both an intoxication and a Urbana is not correct. sent7: if the fact that something is not a dormancy and is a Xhosa is incorrect it is not sectional. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Urbana then it is not chlorotic. sent9: there is something such that if it is not an intoxication and it is a Urbana it is not chlorotic. sent10: if the drivel does not resist arcsine then it is not a kind of a lace. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is an intoxication and it is a kind of a Urbana does not hold it is not chlorotic. sent12: the fact that the mayfish is chlorotic is true if the fact that it is not a kind of an intoxication and it is a Urbana is wrong. sent13: the mayfish is not chlorotic if it is not a kind of an intoxication and it is a Urbana. sent14: the mayfish is not chlorotic if that it is both not an intoxication and a Urbana does not hold. sent15: that there is something such that if the fact that it is not firmamental and it is a kind of a paraffin is false then it is not predictable is true.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
the Genoese is not a sectional if the fact that it is not a kind of a dormancy and it is a Xhosa is incorrect.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it is not an intoxication and is a Urbana is not right then it is not chlorotic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it does not teach and it is a Trevino is false it is a Malva. sent2: the fact that the mayfish does not deserve shittah if that the mayfish is repetitive an intoxication does not hold is true. sent3: the mayfish is not a retirement if it is not a kind of a Urbana. sent4: if that the mayfish is not a Khama and does resist echolocation is incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of an intoxication is correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is an intoxication it is not chlorotic. sent6: that the mayfish is not chlorotic is not incorrect if that it is both an intoxication and a Urbana is not correct. sent7: if the fact that something is not a dormancy and is a Xhosa is incorrect it is not sectional. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Urbana then it is not chlorotic. sent9: there is something such that if it is not an intoxication and it is a Urbana it is not chlorotic. sent10: if the drivel does not resist arcsine then it is not a kind of a lace. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is an intoxication and it is a kind of a Urbana does not hold it is not chlorotic. sent12: the fact that the mayfish is chlorotic is true if the fact that it is not a kind of an intoxication and it is a Urbana is wrong. sent13: the mayfish is not chlorotic if it is not a kind of an intoxication and it is a Urbana. sent14: the mayfish is not chlorotic if that it is both not an intoxication and a Urbana does not hold. sent15: that there is something such that if the fact that it is not firmamental and it is a kind of a paraffin is false then it is not predictable is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__