the haulm does wire.
sent1: that the enterokinase is not Balzacian and is not a Cabalist does not hold. sent2: the alfalfa is onomastics if the fact that the Atlas is onomastics and/or is not a spinach hold. sent3: something is a kind of non-photoconductive thing that is non-tramontane if it is onomastics. sent4: the alfalfa is a Darrow if there is something such that the fact that it does comfort wing-nut and it is a corvette is not correct. sent5: if something is not a Darrow it is not a wired. sent6: the alfalfa does not draw Sylviidae or it is photoconductive or both if it is a tramontane. sent7: there exists something such that that it draws Sylviidae and is a patronymic does not hold. sent8: a patronymic thing that does not draw Sylviidae is not a Darrow. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Tashkent and not a whitecap is wrong then the mayeng does not draw duke. sent10: the haulm wires if the Atlas is a patronymic. sent11: something either is onomastics or is not a spinach or both if it does not scruple. sent12: if the Atlas draws Sylviidae then the haulm is a wired. sent13: the Atlas draws Sylviidae or is a patronymic or both if there is something such that it is a Darrow. sent14: the mayeng is noncombustible if that the fact that the enterokinase is not Balzacian and is not a Cabalist is incorrect is correct. sent15: the Atlas does not scruple if the mayeng is noncombustible but it does not draw duke. sent16: the fact that the moquette is both a Tashkent and not a whitecap is incorrect. sent17: if the Atlas is a kind of a Darrow the alfalfa does draw Sylviidae. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it comforts wing-nut and it is a kind of a corvette is not true. sent19: if something does not comfort wing-nut the alfalfa is a Darrow. sent20: there exists something such that it does comfort wing-nut and it is a corvette. sent21: if a non-patronymic thing is not a kind of a Darrow then it is not a wired.
sent18 & sent4 -> int1: the alfalfa is a Darrow.; int1 -> int2: something is a Darrow.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the Atlas does draw Sylviidae and/or it is a kind of a patronymic.; int3 & sent12 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the haulm is not a wired.
sent21 -> int4: the haulm does not wire if it is not a patronymic and is not a Darrow.; sent3 -> int5: the alfalfa is not photoconductive and not tramontane if it is onomastics.; sent11 -> int6: the Atlas is onomastics or it is not a spinach or both if it is not a kind of a scruple.; sent14 & sent1 -> int7: the mayeng is noncombustible.; sent16 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it is a Tashkent and it is not a whitecap is not correct.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: that the mayeng does not draw duke is right.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the mayeng is noncombustible but it does not draw duke.; sent15 & int10 -> int11: the Atlas does not scruple.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the Atlas is onomastics and/or it is not a kind of a spinach.; sent2 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the alfalfa is onomastics is not false.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the alfalfa is not photoconductive but non-tramontane.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it is not photoconductive and it is not a tramontane.;
$hypothesis$ = the haulm does wire. ; $context$ = sent1: that the enterokinase is not Balzacian and is not a Cabalist does not hold. sent2: the alfalfa is onomastics if the fact that the Atlas is onomastics and/or is not a spinach hold. sent3: something is a kind of non-photoconductive thing that is non-tramontane if it is onomastics. sent4: the alfalfa is a Darrow if there is something such that the fact that it does comfort wing-nut and it is a corvette is not correct. sent5: if something is not a Darrow it is not a wired. sent6: the alfalfa does not draw Sylviidae or it is photoconductive or both if it is a tramontane. sent7: there exists something such that that it draws Sylviidae and is a patronymic does not hold. sent8: a patronymic thing that does not draw Sylviidae is not a Darrow. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Tashkent and not a whitecap is wrong then the mayeng does not draw duke. sent10: the haulm wires if the Atlas is a patronymic. sent11: something either is onomastics or is not a spinach or both if it does not scruple. sent12: if the Atlas draws Sylviidae then the haulm is a wired. sent13: the Atlas draws Sylviidae or is a patronymic or both if there is something such that it is a Darrow. sent14: the mayeng is noncombustible if that the fact that the enterokinase is not Balzacian and is not a Cabalist is incorrect is correct. sent15: the Atlas does not scruple if the mayeng is noncombustible but it does not draw duke. sent16: the fact that the moquette is both a Tashkent and not a whitecap is incorrect. sent17: if the Atlas is a kind of a Darrow the alfalfa does draw Sylviidae. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it comforts wing-nut and it is a kind of a corvette is not true. sent19: if something does not comfort wing-nut the alfalfa is a Darrow. sent20: there exists something such that it does comfort wing-nut and it is a corvette. sent21: if a non-patronymic thing is not a kind of a Darrow then it is not a wired. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent4 -> int1: the alfalfa is a Darrow.; int1 -> int2: something is a Darrow.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the Atlas does draw Sylviidae and/or it is a kind of a patronymic.; int3 & sent12 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__