the arteriole is not a filthiness and it does not hum Mitford.
sent1: the fact that the loxapine is an auditorium that is not fistulous is not right if it is not a tuff. sent2: the arteriole is not a kind of a filthiness. sent3: that the convict is porphyritic and silences spittoon is not correct. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a filthiness and it does not silence vernix is not true. sent5: if that the convict is porphyritic thing that does not silence spittoon is not true then the loxapine is not a kind of a tuff. sent6: if that the arteriole is a kind of a tuff is right it is not fistulous or it is an auditorium or both. sent7: if the fact that the loxapine is a filthiness is right then the fact that the arteriole is not a filthiness and it does not hum Mitford is false. sent8: the fact that the convict is a kind of porphyritic thing that does not silence spittoon is not correct. sent9: something is a filthiness if it is an auditorium. sent10: the loxapine is porphyritic. sent11: that something does not quintuple repose and does not scour Bucephala is false if it is not a messuage. sent12: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a filthiness and does not silence vernix is incorrect then the arteriole is not a filthiness. sent13: the loxapine does not hum Mitford if the arteriole is a kind of a filthiness. sent14: that the mill-girl is non-Methodist thing that hums Mitford does not hold. sent15: if the fact that something does not hum Mitford and it does not silence spittoon is not true then it is a tuff. sent16: if that something is both not an auditorium and not fistulous does not hold it is a kind of a filthiness. sent17: that the loxapine is an auditorium and it is sinistral is correct if it does not strengthen. sent18: the convict is not an auditorium. sent19: the fact that the loxapine is a kind of the filthiness if the loxapine is an auditorium is not wrong. sent20: that the arteriole is a kind of a tuff that does not encroach is wrong. sent21: if the fact that the loxapine is an auditorium is right the convict is not a tuff and it is not fistulous. sent22: the fact that the fact that the arteriole is a filthiness that does not hum Mitford is not right hold. sent23: if something is not a kind of a tuff the fact that it is not an auditorium and is not fistulous is not right.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the loxapine is not a tuff.; sent23 -> int2: that the loxapine is not an auditorium and it is not fistulous is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a tuff is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the loxapine is not an auditorium and it is not fistulous does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: if the fact that the fact that the loxapine is not an auditorium and is not fistulous is true is not correct it is a filthiness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the loxapine is a kind of a filthiness hold.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the loxapine does not hum Mitford and it does not silence dressing is false.
$hypothesis$ = the arteriole is not a filthiness and it does not hum Mitford. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the loxapine is an auditorium that is not fistulous is not right if it is not a tuff. sent2: the arteriole is not a kind of a filthiness. sent3: that the convict is porphyritic and silences spittoon is not correct. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a filthiness and it does not silence vernix is not true. sent5: if that the convict is porphyritic thing that does not silence spittoon is not true then the loxapine is not a kind of a tuff. sent6: if that the arteriole is a kind of a tuff is right it is not fistulous or it is an auditorium or both. sent7: if the fact that the loxapine is a filthiness is right then the fact that the arteriole is not a filthiness and it does not hum Mitford is false. sent8: the fact that the convict is a kind of porphyritic thing that does not silence spittoon is not correct. sent9: something is a filthiness if it is an auditorium. sent10: the loxapine is porphyritic. sent11: that something does not quintuple repose and does not scour Bucephala is false if it is not a messuage. sent12: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a filthiness and does not silence vernix is incorrect then the arteriole is not a filthiness. sent13: the loxapine does not hum Mitford if the arteriole is a kind of a filthiness. sent14: that the mill-girl is non-Methodist thing that hums Mitford does not hold. sent15: if the fact that something does not hum Mitford and it does not silence spittoon is not true then it is a tuff. sent16: if that something is both not an auditorium and not fistulous does not hold it is a kind of a filthiness. sent17: that the loxapine is an auditorium and it is sinistral is correct if it does not strengthen. sent18: the convict is not an auditorium. sent19: the fact that the loxapine is a kind of the filthiness if the loxapine is an auditorium is not wrong. sent20: that the arteriole is a kind of a tuff that does not encroach is wrong. sent21: if the fact that the loxapine is an auditorium is right the convict is not a tuff and it is not fistulous. sent22: the fact that the fact that the arteriole is a filthiness that does not hum Mitford is not right hold. sent23: if something is not a kind of a tuff the fact that it is not an auditorium and is not fistulous is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the loxapine is not a tuff.; sent23 -> int2: that the loxapine is not an auditorium and it is not fistulous is incorrect if that it is not a kind of a tuff is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the loxapine is not an auditorium and it is not fistulous does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: if the fact that the fact that the loxapine is not an auditorium and is not fistulous is true is not correct it is a filthiness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the loxapine is a kind of a filthiness hold.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__