the parachute does not eliminate Lot.
sent1: the plaiter does not eliminate Lot. sent2: if the fact that the fishpond defibrillates plaiter but it is not a kind of a beeline is not right then it does not defibrillates plaiter. sent3: the parachute eliminates Stoppard. sent4: the parachute is a grill. sent5: the drawler is a Verne if the fishpond is not accurate. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a discus and it is attachable does not hold. sent7: if something is non-dualistic then that the fishpond does defibrillate plaiter and is not a kind of a beeline does not hold. sent8: The Stoppard does eliminate plaiter. sent9: if that the Huguenot is not non-freelance but dualistic does not hold then the WAC is not dualistic. sent10: the parachute is not a brainworker. sent11: that either something is a Verne or it is not accurate or both hold if it does not defibrillate plaiter. sent12: the canafistola does not languish and/or it is a annuitant if the drawler is a Verne. sent13: the plaiter is not a kind of a Creole. sent14: the drawler is a Verne if the fishpond is a Verne. sent15: if something does not languish it does eliminate favorableness and abounds. sent16: the plaiter does eliminate Stoppard. sent17: the natrolite is not a mandolin if there exists something such that that it is not a discus and it is attachable is not right. sent18: if the natrolite is not a mandolin then the fact that the Huguenot freelances and it is dualistic is not right. sent19: if that the plaiter does eliminate Lot is not incorrect the parachute does eliminate Lot. sent20: the plaiter is a grill. sent21: if something does not languish or it is a annuitant or both then it does not languish.
sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the plaiter eliminates Stoppard and it is a grill.;
that the parachute does eliminate Lot is not incorrect.
sent15 -> int2: the canafistola eliminates favorableness and abounds if that it does languish does not hold.; sent21 -> int3: if the canafistola does not languish and/or is a annuitant then it does not languish.; sent11 -> int4: the fishpond either is a kind of a Verne or is not accurate or both if it does not defibrillate plaiter.; sent6 & sent17 -> int5: the natrolite is not a mandolin.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Huguenot freelances and it is dualistic does not hold.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the WAC is non-dualistic.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not dualistic.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the fact that the fishpond does defibrillate plaiter but it is not a beeline is wrong.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the fishpond does not defibrillate plaiter.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the fishpond is a kind of a Verne or is not accurate or both.; int11 & sent14 & sent5 -> int12: the drawler is a Verne.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: either the canafistola does not languish or it is a annuitant or both.; int3 & int13 -> int14: the canafistola does not languish.; int2 & int14 -> int15: the canafistola eliminates favorableness and it abounds.; int15 -> int16: the canafistola abounds.; int16 -> int17: something abounds.;
$hypothesis$ = the parachute does not eliminate Lot. ; $context$ = sent1: the plaiter does not eliminate Lot. sent2: if the fact that the fishpond defibrillates plaiter but it is not a kind of a beeline is not right then it does not defibrillates plaiter. sent3: the parachute eliminates Stoppard. sent4: the parachute is a grill. sent5: the drawler is a Verne if the fishpond is not accurate. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a discus and it is attachable does not hold. sent7: if something is non-dualistic then that the fishpond does defibrillate plaiter and is not a kind of a beeline does not hold. sent8: The Stoppard does eliminate plaiter. sent9: if that the Huguenot is not non-freelance but dualistic does not hold then the WAC is not dualistic. sent10: the parachute is not a brainworker. sent11: that either something is a Verne or it is not accurate or both hold if it does not defibrillate plaiter. sent12: the canafistola does not languish and/or it is a annuitant if the drawler is a Verne. sent13: the plaiter is not a kind of a Creole. sent14: the drawler is a Verne if the fishpond is a Verne. sent15: if something does not languish it does eliminate favorableness and abounds. sent16: the plaiter does eliminate Stoppard. sent17: the natrolite is not a mandolin if there exists something such that that it is not a discus and it is attachable is not right. sent18: if the natrolite is not a mandolin then the fact that the Huguenot freelances and it is dualistic is not right. sent19: if that the plaiter does eliminate Lot is not incorrect the parachute does eliminate Lot. sent20: the plaiter is a grill. sent21: if something does not languish or it is a annuitant or both then it does not languish. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the plaiter eliminates Stoppard and it is a grill.; __UNKNOWN__