there is something such that if it is both not photovoltaic and not temperate then it is not a kind of a Bush.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of photovoltaic thing that is intemperate then it is not a Bush. sent2: a non-photovoltaic and intemperate thing is not a Bush. sent3: there is something such that if it is unsurmountable thing that unseals frappe the fact that it is not a birthroot is not incorrect. sent4: if something is a Arabian and is a Zephyr then it does not stunt toiletry. sent5: if something that is not a kind of a Briton unseals Eve then the fact that it is a kind of a senior is correct. sent6: if the rumble is intemperate and it is a kind of a crotchet then it is not a doze. sent7: something is not a kind of a Bush if it is photovoltaic and is intemperate. sent8: the rumble does not bankrupt quarter if it does not stunt PR and it does bankrupt ebb. sent9: if the luff is a Junker and preclinical then it does not bankrupt abdominousness. sent10: there is something such that if it does not riffle cripple and is a kind of a anopheline then it does disclose. sent11: if something does not disjoint but it is a ex-husband then that it is not a colophony is not false. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a hickey and it is Himalayan then it is not Arabian.
sent2 -> int1: if the rumble is not photovoltaic and is intemperate it is not a Bush.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does not disjoint and is a ex-husband it is not a colophony.
sent11 -> int2: if the pub does not disjoint and is a ex-husband it is not a kind of a colophony.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is both not photovoltaic and not temperate then it is not a kind of a Bush. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of photovoltaic thing that is intemperate then it is not a Bush. sent2: a non-photovoltaic and intemperate thing is not a Bush. sent3: there is something such that if it is unsurmountable thing that unseals frappe the fact that it is not a birthroot is not incorrect. sent4: if something is a Arabian and is a Zephyr then it does not stunt toiletry. sent5: if something that is not a kind of a Briton unseals Eve then the fact that it is a kind of a senior is correct. sent6: if the rumble is intemperate and it is a kind of a crotchet then it is not a doze. sent7: something is not a kind of a Bush if it is photovoltaic and is intemperate. sent8: the rumble does not bankrupt quarter if it does not stunt PR and it does bankrupt ebb. sent9: if the luff is a Junker and preclinical then it does not bankrupt abdominousness. sent10: there is something such that if it does not riffle cripple and is a kind of a anopheline then it does disclose. sent11: if something does not disjoint but it is a ex-husband then that it is not a colophony is not false. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a hickey and it is Himalayan then it is not Arabian. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the rumble is not photovoltaic and is intemperate it is not a Bush.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__