that that the Cretaceousness does not occur leads to that both the turnaround and the counterpointing occurs is not correct.
sent1: the civilness does not occur and the rerunning Postimpressionist does not occur. sent2: the non-intentionalness brings about that the Cretaceousness happens. sent3: the panicking Eisenstaedt occurs and the panicking threonine occurs. sent4: the fact that if the turnaround does not occur that the poundage happens and the armament happens is wrong is right. sent5: if that the poundage happens and the armament happens is not true the intentionalness does not occur. sent6: that both the inadvisableness and the impotentness happens does not hold if that the scorcher does not occur hold. sent7: if the fact that the intentionalness happens but the turnaround does not occur does not hold the passerine happens. sent8: if the panicking Eisenstaedt occurs then the panicking dial does not occur and the swan does not occur. sent9: if the counterpoint does not occur the fact that the intentionalness occurs but the turnaround does not occur does not hold. sent10: the non-eusporangiateness yields that the Cretaceousness and the archidiaconalness happens. sent11: either the dispersion does not occur or the mission does not occur or both if the fact that the rerunning Postimpressionist does not occur is true. sent12: the turnaround occurs and the counterpointing occurs if the Cretaceous occurs. sent13: the panicking Eisenstaedt does not occur if that the non-emphysematousness and the panicking Eisenstaedt happens is wrong. sent14: if that both the eusporangiateness and the panicking threonine happens is not right then the eusporangiateness does not occur. sent15: the panicking Seattle does not occur. sent16: the swan does not occur if the dispersion does not occur. sent17: the intentionalness is prevented by that the armament does not occur. sent18: that the counterpoint happens and the eusporangiateness happens is triggered by that the panicking dial does not occur. sent19: the mission happens and the panicking treenail happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the turnaround does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: that both the poundage and the armament occurs is not right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the intentionalness does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Cretaceousness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Cretaceousness does not occur is not incorrect.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the turnaround happens.; sent3 -> int6: that the panicking Eisenstaedt occurs is right.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the panicking dial does not occur and the swanning does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the panicking dial does not occur.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: both the counterpointing and the eusporangiateness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the counterpoint occurs.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the turnaround happens and the counterpointing happens.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the archidiaconalness and the passerineness occurs.
sent1 -> int12: the rerunning Postimpressionist does not occur.; sent11 & int12 -> int13: the dispersion does not occur or the mission does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the Cretaceousness does not occur leads to that both the turnaround and the counterpointing occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the civilness does not occur and the rerunning Postimpressionist does not occur. sent2: the non-intentionalness brings about that the Cretaceousness happens. sent3: the panicking Eisenstaedt occurs and the panicking threonine occurs. sent4: the fact that if the turnaround does not occur that the poundage happens and the armament happens is wrong is right. sent5: if that the poundage happens and the armament happens is not true the intentionalness does not occur. sent6: that both the inadvisableness and the impotentness happens does not hold if that the scorcher does not occur hold. sent7: if the fact that the intentionalness happens but the turnaround does not occur does not hold the passerine happens. sent8: if the panicking Eisenstaedt occurs then the panicking dial does not occur and the swan does not occur. sent9: if the counterpoint does not occur the fact that the intentionalness occurs but the turnaround does not occur does not hold. sent10: the non-eusporangiateness yields that the Cretaceousness and the archidiaconalness happens. sent11: either the dispersion does not occur or the mission does not occur or both if the fact that the rerunning Postimpressionist does not occur is true. sent12: the turnaround occurs and the counterpointing occurs if the Cretaceous occurs. sent13: the panicking Eisenstaedt does not occur if that the non-emphysematousness and the panicking Eisenstaedt happens is wrong. sent14: if that both the eusporangiateness and the panicking threonine happens is not right then the eusporangiateness does not occur. sent15: the panicking Seattle does not occur. sent16: the swan does not occur if the dispersion does not occur. sent17: the intentionalness is prevented by that the armament does not occur. sent18: that the counterpoint happens and the eusporangiateness happens is triggered by that the panicking dial does not occur. sent19: the mission happens and the panicking treenail happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the turnaround does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: that both the poundage and the armament occurs is not right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the intentionalness does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Cretaceousness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Cretaceousness does not occur is not incorrect.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the turnaround happens.; sent3 -> int6: that the panicking Eisenstaedt occurs is right.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the panicking dial does not occur and the swanning does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the panicking dial does not occur.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: both the counterpointing and the eusporangiateness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the counterpoint occurs.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the turnaround happens and the counterpointing happens.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__