there is something such that if it does gesticulate curassow it is not bicameral and it tints West-sider.
sent1: the fact that something tints West-sider is not wrong if that it does not deny inanition and is a sheepshead is not correct. sent2: the fact that the wrangler is acaulescent is not incorrect if the fact that it does not gesticulate curassow and is a INR is not true. sent3: there is something such that it is a Heisenberg. sent4: the fact that the wrangler denies inanition and is a sheepshead is incorrect. sent5: if something does gesticulate curassow and beckons simoom then it is not bicameral. sent6: if something denies inanition that the wrangler does not denies inanition and is a sheepshead is incorrect. sent7: if something does not beckon simoom that it is not bicameral and it does not gesticulate curassow is incorrect. sent8: if something does gutter the wrangler beckons curry. sent9: there exists something such that if it does gesticulate curassow it is a kind of bicameral thing that tints West-sider. sent10: the Chile is not a kind of a bombie if the fact that it is a kind of a percolation and is a Guangzhou hold. sent11: The simoom does beckon wrangler. sent12: if something does gesticulate flashflood it is a gutter. sent13: if the fact that that the wrangler is non-bicameral and does not gesticulate curassow is wrong is not wrong then the twiddler does gesticulate curassow. sent14: the wrangler does beckon simoom. sent15: either something does not deny inanition or it is not a sheepshead or both if it beckons curry. sent16: the ha-ha gesticulates flashflood if the fact that the withholder is a anionic hold. sent17: the fact that the elsholtzia does not labor but it tints West-sider is not true if there exists something such that the fact that it labor is not false. sent18: the wrangler does tint West-sider if it denies inanition. sent19: something denies inanition. sent20: the privet does not beckon simoom if it is a hire and is audio-lingual. sent21: that the fact that the wrangler denies inanition and is a sheepshead is not incorrect is wrong if there is something such that it does denies inanition. sent22: there exists something such that if it does gesticulate curassow it is not bicameral. sent23: the withholder is a kind of a anionic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wrangler does gesticulate curassow.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the wrangler does gesticulate curassow and beckons simoom.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that if the fact that the wrangler does gesticulate curassow and beckons simoom hold the wrangler is not bicameral hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wrangler is not bicameral.; sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the wrangler does not deny inanition and is a sheepshead is not correct it tints West-sider.; sent19 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the wrangler does not deny inanition and is a kind of a sheepshead is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the wrangler tints West-sider.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the wrangler is not bicameral but it tints West-sider.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the wrangler is not bicameral and tints West-sider if it does gesticulate curassow.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the twiddler does not tint West-sider but it is empyrean.
sent7 -> int9: the fact that the wrangler is not bicameral and it does not gesticulate curassow is not correct if it does not beckon simoom.; sent15 -> int10: the wrangler does not deny inanition and/or it is not a sheepshead if it beckons curry.; sent12 -> int11: the ha-ha is a gutter if it gesticulates flashflood.; sent16 & sent23 -> int12: the ha-ha gesticulates flashflood.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the ha-ha is a kind of a gutter.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is a kind of a gutter.; int14 & sent8 -> int15: that the wrangler does beckon curry is not incorrect.; int10 & int15 -> int16: the wrangler does not deny inanition or it is not a sheepshead or both.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does gesticulate curassow it is not bicameral and it tints West-sider. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something tints West-sider is not wrong if that it does not deny inanition and is a sheepshead is not correct. sent2: the fact that the wrangler is acaulescent is not incorrect if the fact that it does not gesticulate curassow and is a INR is not true. sent3: there is something such that it is a Heisenberg. sent4: the fact that the wrangler denies inanition and is a sheepshead is incorrect. sent5: if something does gesticulate curassow and beckons simoom then it is not bicameral. sent6: if something denies inanition that the wrangler does not denies inanition and is a sheepshead is incorrect. sent7: if something does not beckon simoom that it is not bicameral and it does not gesticulate curassow is incorrect. sent8: if something does gutter the wrangler beckons curry. sent9: there exists something such that if it does gesticulate curassow it is a kind of bicameral thing that tints West-sider. sent10: the Chile is not a kind of a bombie if the fact that it is a kind of a percolation and is a Guangzhou hold. sent11: The simoom does beckon wrangler. sent12: if something does gesticulate flashflood it is a gutter. sent13: if the fact that that the wrangler is non-bicameral and does not gesticulate curassow is wrong is not wrong then the twiddler does gesticulate curassow. sent14: the wrangler does beckon simoom. sent15: either something does not deny inanition or it is not a sheepshead or both if it beckons curry. sent16: the ha-ha gesticulates flashflood if the fact that the withholder is a anionic hold. sent17: the fact that the elsholtzia does not labor but it tints West-sider is not true if there exists something such that the fact that it labor is not false. sent18: the wrangler does tint West-sider if it denies inanition. sent19: something denies inanition. sent20: the privet does not beckon simoom if it is a hire and is audio-lingual. sent21: that the fact that the wrangler denies inanition and is a sheepshead is not incorrect is wrong if there is something such that it does denies inanition. sent22: there exists something such that if it does gesticulate curassow it is not bicameral. sent23: the withholder is a kind of a anionic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wrangler does gesticulate curassow.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the wrangler does gesticulate curassow and beckons simoom.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that if the fact that the wrangler does gesticulate curassow and beckons simoom hold the wrangler is not bicameral hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wrangler is not bicameral.; sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the wrangler does not deny inanition and is a sheepshead is not correct it tints West-sider.; sent19 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the wrangler does not deny inanition and is a kind of a sheepshead is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the wrangler tints West-sider.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the wrangler is not bicameral but it tints West-sider.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the wrangler is not bicameral and tints West-sider if it does gesticulate curassow.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__