that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a immovability then that it does not scald pagan and is edible is incorrect is not false.
sent1: if the fritter is not a immovability then that it scalds pagan and is edible is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a immovability it does not scald pagan and is edible. sent3: that the elevation is both not eutrophic and numerological is wrong if it does not scald pagan. sent4: there is something such that if it does not bespangle tied then the fact that it does not destine murmuring and is associational is not true. sent5: if something is not a Trichiuridae the fact that it does not destine Pekinese and scalds pancreatectomy does not hold. sent6: the fact that the fritter does not scald pagan and is edible is not true if it is a kind of a immovability. sent7: that the fritter is non-associational and is bulimic does not hold if it is non-postural. sent8: that the fritter does not scald pagan and is edible does not hold if it is not a immovability. sent9: the fact that something is both not a kite and eugenic is false if it is not a kind of a antiphonary. sent10: if the fritter is not a immovability it does not scald pagan and is edible. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is a immovability is true then the fact that it does not scald pagan and it is edible does not hold. sent12: if the futon is non-skeletal that that it does not bespangle ounce and is edible is not wrong does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not clonal then the fact that it is both not eremitic and eugenic does not hold. sent14: that there is something such that if it is not a immovability the fact that it scalds pagan and it is edible does not hold is correct.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the gulping does not destine Pekinese and does scald pancreatectomy does not hold if it is not a Trichiuridae.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a immovability then that it does not scald pagan and is edible is incorrect is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fritter is not a immovability then that it scalds pagan and is edible is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a immovability it does not scald pagan and is edible. sent3: that the elevation is both not eutrophic and numerological is wrong if it does not scald pagan. sent4: there is something such that if it does not bespangle tied then the fact that it does not destine murmuring and is associational is not true. sent5: if something is not a Trichiuridae the fact that it does not destine Pekinese and scalds pancreatectomy does not hold. sent6: the fact that the fritter does not scald pagan and is edible is not true if it is a kind of a immovability. sent7: that the fritter is non-associational and is bulimic does not hold if it is non-postural. sent8: that the fritter does not scald pagan and is edible does not hold if it is not a immovability. sent9: the fact that something is both not a kite and eugenic is false if it is not a kind of a antiphonary. sent10: if the fritter is not a immovability it does not scald pagan and is edible. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is a immovability is true then the fact that it does not scald pagan and it is edible does not hold. sent12: if the futon is non-skeletal that that it does not bespangle ounce and is edible is not wrong does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not clonal then the fact that it is both not eremitic and eugenic does not hold. sent14: that there is something such that if it is not a immovability the fact that it scalds pagan and it is edible does not hold is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__