the downpour is a kind of a harmonic.
sent1: the tangerine is aphoristic but it is not a Fabianism. sent2: a non-vitiliginous thing palatalizes acetylene and is not headless. sent3: if something palatalizes acetylene then it is polymorphic. sent4: the Lilo palatalizes acetylene if the sector is vitiliginous. sent5: the tangerine is not a Fabianism. sent6: the tangerine is a demonetization if it is aphoristic. sent7: the tangerine is not a kind of a demonetization if there exists something such that the fact that it is viral thing that does not sear is true. sent8: that if the fact that the sector is not vitiliginous is not incorrect the fly-by-night is viral but it does not sear is right. sent9: there is something such that it is viral. sent10: if the Lilo is polymorphic then the downpour is a harmonic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sector is not vitiliginous.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fly-by-night is a kind of viral thing that does not sear.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a kind of viral thing that does not sear.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the tangerine is not a demonetization.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the tangerine is not aphoristic does not hold.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the tangerine is a demonetization.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the sector is not non-vitiliginous.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the Lilo does palatalize acetylene.; sent3 -> int9: the Lilo is polymorphic if it does palatalize acetylene.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the Lilo is polymorphic.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the tangerine does palatalize acetylene but it is not headless.
sent2 -> int11: if the tangerine is not vitiliginous it does palatalize acetylene and is not headless.;
$hypothesis$ = the downpour is a kind of a harmonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the tangerine is aphoristic but it is not a Fabianism. sent2: a non-vitiliginous thing palatalizes acetylene and is not headless. sent3: if something palatalizes acetylene then it is polymorphic. sent4: the Lilo palatalizes acetylene if the sector is vitiliginous. sent5: the tangerine is not a Fabianism. sent6: the tangerine is a demonetization if it is aphoristic. sent7: the tangerine is not a kind of a demonetization if there exists something such that the fact that it is viral thing that does not sear is true. sent8: that if the fact that the sector is not vitiliginous is not incorrect the fly-by-night is viral but it does not sear is right. sent9: there is something such that it is viral. sent10: if the Lilo is polymorphic then the downpour is a harmonic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sector is not vitiliginous.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fly-by-night is a kind of viral thing that does not sear.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a kind of viral thing that does not sear.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the tangerine is not a demonetization.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the tangerine is not aphoristic does not hold.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the tangerine is a demonetization.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the sector is not non-vitiliginous.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the Lilo does palatalize acetylene.; sent3 -> int9: the Lilo is polymorphic if it does palatalize acetylene.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the Lilo is polymorphic.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__