the millboard does destroy.
sent1: the poacher does not encapsulate Ney if there exists something such that the fact that it encapsulate Ney and it is not a Phrygian is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the numismatist is a doddle and it does twill globin is wrong if it is not a kind of a Phrygian. sent3: the millboard does not twill globin if there exists something such that the fact that it is a doddle and it twill globin is not right. sent4: something destroys if the fact that it is not chromatographic is not false. sent5: the numismatist is not a kind of a Phrygian. sent6: there exists something such that it is non-Malawian and it is a kind of a butterbur. sent7: there exists something such that it does not destroy. sent8: the physique is a baldness if something that does twill globin is a Phrygian. sent9: if the numismatist does twill globin then the poacher does twill globin and is not a baldness. sent10: there is something such that it is a doddle. sent11: the physique encapsulates Ney but it is not a baldness. sent12: that something does twill globin but it is not a baldness is not correct if it does not encapsulate Ney. sent13: something is resolute and it is a kind of a surrenderer. sent14: the perpetrator is not a doddle. sent15: if something that is not a Malawian is a butterbur the millboard is chromatographic. sent16: the cur does encapsulate Ney. sent17: if something destroys and is chromatographic then the numismatist twills globin. sent18: the fact that the fact that the fact that the physique does encapsulate Ney but it is not a kind of a Phrygian is right is false is right if the perpetrator is not a kind of a doddle. sent19: if something that does not twill globin does not encapsulate Ney then it is not chromatographic.
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the millboard is not chromatographic is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the millboard does destroy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the millboard destroys and it is chromatographic.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it destroys and it is chromatographic.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the numismatist twills globin.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the poacher does twill globin and is not a baldness.; sent12 -> int6: if the poacher does not encapsulate Ney that it twills globin and it is not a kind of a baldness is not correct.; sent18 & sent14 -> int7: that the physique encapsulates Ney and is not a Phrygian is false.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it does encapsulate Ney and it is not a Phrygian is not true.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: that the poacher does not encapsulate Ney hold.; int6 & int9 -> int10: that the poacher does twill globin and is not a kind of a baldness is not correct.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the cur is a VIP and it is a kind of a Malawian.
$hypothesis$ = the millboard does destroy. ; $context$ = sent1: the poacher does not encapsulate Ney if there exists something such that the fact that it encapsulate Ney and it is not a Phrygian is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the numismatist is a doddle and it does twill globin is wrong if it is not a kind of a Phrygian. sent3: the millboard does not twill globin if there exists something such that the fact that it is a doddle and it twill globin is not right. sent4: something destroys if the fact that it is not chromatographic is not false. sent5: the numismatist is not a kind of a Phrygian. sent6: there exists something such that it is non-Malawian and it is a kind of a butterbur. sent7: there exists something such that it does not destroy. sent8: the physique is a baldness if something that does twill globin is a Phrygian. sent9: if the numismatist does twill globin then the poacher does twill globin and is not a baldness. sent10: there is something such that it is a doddle. sent11: the physique encapsulates Ney but it is not a baldness. sent12: that something does twill globin but it is not a baldness is not correct if it does not encapsulate Ney. sent13: something is resolute and it is a kind of a surrenderer. sent14: the perpetrator is not a doddle. sent15: if something that is not a Malawian is a butterbur the millboard is chromatographic. sent16: the cur does encapsulate Ney. sent17: if something destroys and is chromatographic then the numismatist twills globin. sent18: the fact that the fact that the fact that the physique does encapsulate Ney but it is not a kind of a Phrygian is right is false is right if the perpetrator is not a kind of a doddle. sent19: if something that does not twill globin does not encapsulate Ney then it is not chromatographic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the millboard is not chromatographic is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the millboard does destroy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the millboard destroys and it is chromatographic.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it destroys and it is chromatographic.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the numismatist twills globin.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the poacher does twill globin and is not a baldness.; sent12 -> int6: if the poacher does not encapsulate Ney that it twills globin and it is not a kind of a baldness is not correct.; sent18 & sent14 -> int7: that the physique encapsulates Ney and is not a Phrygian is false.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it does encapsulate Ney and it is not a Phrygian is not true.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: that the poacher does not encapsulate Ney hold.; int6 & int9 -> int10: that the poacher does twill globin and is not a kind of a baldness is not correct.; int5 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__