the medalist is a gambler that does knit cardholder.
sent1: the greenhood knits pit if there exists something such that it does knits pit and/or it does trivialize fantan. sent2: if something does not theme Comstock then that it is a gambler that does knit cardholder is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that the sequin does not knit Fergon and is a mahoe does not hold then it is guilty. sent4: the fact that the sequin does not knit Fergon but it is a mahoe does not hold. sent5: either the sequin does knit pit or it trivializes fantan or both. sent6: the medalist does knit cardholder. sent7: The cardholder does knit medalist. sent8: that the sequin does not coat alpaca hold if the fact that either the Donatist coat alpaca or it is a puppeteer or both is not right. sent9: there exists something such that it does theme Comstock. sent10: the fact that the sequin knits Fergon and it is a kind of a mahoe does not hold. sent11: the sequin trivializes fantan. sent12: if the sequin does knit Fergon then it is guilty. sent13: the medalist does gamble if something is guilty and themes Comstock. sent14: there is something such that it is guilty. sent15: if the sequin does not coat alpaca then that the medalist does not trivialize fantan and is not guilty is not right. sent16: the alpaca is a mahoe. sent17: that the Donatist does coat alpaca or it is a puppeteer or both is incorrect if it does not knit postmark.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the sequin is guilty.;
the greenhood does knit pit and it does theme Comstock.
sent5 -> int2: there exists something such that it knits pit and/or it trivializes fantan.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the greenhood does knit pit.;
$hypothesis$ = the medalist is a gambler that does knit cardholder. ; $context$ = sent1: the greenhood knits pit if there exists something such that it does knits pit and/or it does trivialize fantan. sent2: if something does not theme Comstock then that it is a gambler that does knit cardholder is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that the sequin does not knit Fergon and is a mahoe does not hold then it is guilty. sent4: the fact that the sequin does not knit Fergon but it is a mahoe does not hold. sent5: either the sequin does knit pit or it trivializes fantan or both. sent6: the medalist does knit cardholder. sent7: The cardholder does knit medalist. sent8: that the sequin does not coat alpaca hold if the fact that either the Donatist coat alpaca or it is a puppeteer or both is not right. sent9: there exists something such that it does theme Comstock. sent10: the fact that the sequin knits Fergon and it is a kind of a mahoe does not hold. sent11: the sequin trivializes fantan. sent12: if the sequin does knit Fergon then it is guilty. sent13: the medalist does gamble if something is guilty and themes Comstock. sent14: there is something such that it is guilty. sent15: if the sequin does not coat alpaca then that the medalist does not trivialize fantan and is not guilty is not right. sent16: the alpaca is a mahoe. sent17: that the Donatist does coat alpaca or it is a puppeteer or both is incorrect if it does not knit postmark. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the sequin is guilty.; __UNKNOWN__