the haste happens.
sent1: that the pauperization does not occur yields that the potlatch and the court occurs. sent2: if that the Creation does not occur but the salting busboy occurs is not right the Creation occurs. sent3: the fragment occurs. sent4: the fact that the phenotypicalness does not occur but the driftage happens is false if the potlatch occurs. sent5: if that the non-phenotypicalness and the driftage happens does not hold the discountenancing ingenue does not occur. sent6: that both the non-appointiveness and the fragmenting occurs is incorrect if the Creation happens. sent7: the leg happens. sent8: that the gait occurs is correct. sent9: the fact that the reuniting does not occur and the investing does not occur hold if the unprofessionalness does not occur. sent10: that the salaaming does not occur and the compartmentalizing uke does not occur causes that the pauperization does not occur. sent11: if the fact that that both the non-appointiveness and the fragmenting occurs is wrong hold the fragmenting does not occur. sent12: that the haste and the four-hitter happens is triggered by that the fragment does not occur. sent13: that the haste happens is prevented by that the four-hitter and the fragmenting happens. sent14: that the salaaming does not occur and the compartmentalizing uke does not occur is brought about by that the separationism does not occur. sent15: the four-hitter occurs. sent16: if the night-stop and the devotional happens the compartmentalizing pruner does not occur. sent17: both the diluting and the bedrest occurs if the reuniting does not occur. sent18: not the unprofessionalness but the identifiableness happens if the discountenancing ingenue does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the diluting occurs hold that not the Creation but the salting busboy happens is false.
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: the four-hitter and the fragmenting occurs.; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis;
that the haste occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = the haste happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pauperization does not occur yields that the potlatch and the court occurs. sent2: if that the Creation does not occur but the salting busboy occurs is not right the Creation occurs. sent3: the fragment occurs. sent4: the fact that the phenotypicalness does not occur but the driftage happens is false if the potlatch occurs. sent5: if that the non-phenotypicalness and the driftage happens does not hold the discountenancing ingenue does not occur. sent6: that both the non-appointiveness and the fragmenting occurs is incorrect if the Creation happens. sent7: the leg happens. sent8: that the gait occurs is correct. sent9: the fact that the reuniting does not occur and the investing does not occur hold if the unprofessionalness does not occur. sent10: that the salaaming does not occur and the compartmentalizing uke does not occur causes that the pauperization does not occur. sent11: if the fact that that both the non-appointiveness and the fragmenting occurs is wrong hold the fragmenting does not occur. sent12: that the haste and the four-hitter happens is triggered by that the fragment does not occur. sent13: that the haste happens is prevented by that the four-hitter and the fragmenting happens. sent14: that the salaaming does not occur and the compartmentalizing uke does not occur is brought about by that the separationism does not occur. sent15: the four-hitter occurs. sent16: if the night-stop and the devotional happens the compartmentalizing pruner does not occur. sent17: both the diluting and the bedrest occurs if the reuniting does not occur. sent18: not the unprofessionalness but the identifiableness happens if the discountenancing ingenue does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the diluting occurs hold that not the Creation but the salting busboy happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: the four-hitter and the fragmenting occurs.; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__