if the bailey does not fluoresce then the fact that the centerboard is not avirulent and does supple Arhus does not hold.
sent1: that the centerboard does not supple Arhus and does fluoresce is not true if the bailey supple Arhus. sent2: if the bailey does not fluoresce then the fact that the centerboard is avirulent and it does supple Arhus is not right. sent3: if the coelenteron is avirulent then that the centerboard is avirulent and it supples Arhus is not right. sent4: if the bailey fluoresces then the fact that the cambium does not fluoresces but it does swim Tylenchidae does not hold. sent5: if the bailey does not fluoresce then the centerboard is not avirulent but it supples Arhus. sent6: if the centerboard does not swim Tylenchidae the fact that the cambium supples Arhus hold. sent7: that the cambium does not fluoresce is not incorrect. sent8: that the coelenteron does not swim Tylenchidae and is avirulent is not correct. sent9: the bailey supples Arhus. sent10: the fact that the centerboard is not avirulent and does swim Tylenchidae is not correct if the cambium is avirulent. sent11: the centerboard does not fluoresce. sent12: the centerboard is non-avirulent but it does supple Arhus. sent13: the coelenteron is avirulent if the cambium does swim Tylenchidae. sent14: the coelenteron fluoresces. sent15: if the fact that the coelenteron is avirulent is right the centerboard is not avirulent but it does supple Arhus. sent16: the fact that the centerboard is avirulent and it supples Arhus does not hold. sent17: the centerboard swims Tylenchidae if the cambium does supple Arhus. sent18: the fact that that the centerboard is not avirulent but it does supple Arhus is not correct if the coelenteron is avirulent is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cambium does not swim Tylenchidae.;
$hypothesis$ = if the bailey does not fluoresce then the fact that the centerboard is not avirulent and does supple Arhus does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the centerboard does not supple Arhus and does fluoresce is not true if the bailey supple Arhus. sent2: if the bailey does not fluoresce then the fact that the centerboard is avirulent and it does supple Arhus is not right. sent3: if the coelenteron is avirulent then that the centerboard is avirulent and it supples Arhus is not right. sent4: if the bailey fluoresces then the fact that the cambium does not fluoresces but it does swim Tylenchidae does not hold. sent5: if the bailey does not fluoresce then the centerboard is not avirulent but it supples Arhus. sent6: if the centerboard does not swim Tylenchidae the fact that the cambium supples Arhus hold. sent7: that the cambium does not fluoresce is not incorrect. sent8: that the coelenteron does not swim Tylenchidae and is avirulent is not correct. sent9: the bailey supples Arhus. sent10: the fact that the centerboard is not avirulent and does swim Tylenchidae is not correct if the cambium is avirulent. sent11: the centerboard does not fluoresce. sent12: the centerboard is non-avirulent but it does supple Arhus. sent13: the coelenteron is avirulent if the cambium does swim Tylenchidae. sent14: the coelenteron fluoresces. sent15: if the fact that the coelenteron is avirulent is right the centerboard is not avirulent but it does supple Arhus. sent16: the fact that the centerboard is avirulent and it supples Arhus does not hold. sent17: the centerboard swims Tylenchidae if the cambium does supple Arhus. sent18: the fact that that the centerboard is not avirulent but it does supple Arhus is not correct if the coelenteron is avirulent is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cambium does not swim Tylenchidae.; __UNKNOWN__