the Ukranian is an endemic.
sent1: the teetotaler renders teleconference and it is a thermometer if something does rendezvous bap. sent2: there exists something such that it is a thermometer. sent3: something is a Vermeer and it is a kind of a Opposition. sent4: there exists something such that it rendezvous bap. sent5: the hire is anemographic and it does rendezvous drapery. sent6: the hire is a kind of a thermometer. sent7: there exists something such that it does render teleconference. sent8: the bap pleaches Woollcott and it succeeds. sent9: the Ukranian is persuasive thing that is a thermometer. sent10: the Ukranian rendezvous drapery and it is a Manilkara if there are non-persuasive things. sent11: if something succeeds and it rendezvous drapery it is not endemic. sent12: the hire is not persuasive if there is something such that it does render teleconference and is a thermometer. sent13: the Ukranian is a orchiopexy. sent14: something does succeed if it is a orchiopexy.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the teetotaler does render teleconference and it is a thermometer.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it renders teleconference and it is a thermometer.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the hire is not persuasive.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is not persuasive.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the Ukranian rendezvous drapery and is a kind of a Manilkara.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the Ukranian rendezvous drapery is not incorrect.; sent14 -> int7: if the Ukranian is a kind of a orchiopexy then it does succeed.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the Ukranian succeeds.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the Ukranian does succeed and does rendezvous drapery.; sent11 -> int10: the Ukranian is not a kind of an endemic if it succeeds and it rendezvous drapery.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the polychrome is not an endemic.
sent9 -> int11: the Ukranian is a thermometer.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is a thermometer.;
$hypothesis$ = the Ukranian is an endemic. ; $context$ = sent1: the teetotaler renders teleconference and it is a thermometer if something does rendezvous bap. sent2: there exists something such that it is a thermometer. sent3: something is a Vermeer and it is a kind of a Opposition. sent4: there exists something such that it rendezvous bap. sent5: the hire is anemographic and it does rendezvous drapery. sent6: the hire is a kind of a thermometer. sent7: there exists something such that it does render teleconference. sent8: the bap pleaches Woollcott and it succeeds. sent9: the Ukranian is persuasive thing that is a thermometer. sent10: the Ukranian rendezvous drapery and it is a Manilkara if there are non-persuasive things. sent11: if something succeeds and it rendezvous drapery it is not endemic. sent12: the hire is not persuasive if there is something such that it does render teleconference and is a thermometer. sent13: the Ukranian is a orchiopexy. sent14: something does succeed if it is a orchiopexy. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the teetotaler does render teleconference and it is a thermometer.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it renders teleconference and it is a thermometer.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the hire is not persuasive.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is not persuasive.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the Ukranian rendezvous drapery and is a kind of a Manilkara.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the Ukranian rendezvous drapery is not incorrect.; sent14 -> int7: if the Ukranian is a kind of a orchiopexy then it does succeed.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the Ukranian succeeds.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the Ukranian does succeed and does rendezvous drapery.; sent11 -> int10: the Ukranian is not a kind of an endemic if it succeeds and it rendezvous drapery.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__