that there exists something such that if it is not a pilferer that it is a soleus and does unseal birthroot is not correct is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not complain hold that it does bankrupt Anacardium and it is a kind of a start is not true. sent2: there is something such that if it is a pilferer then that the fact that it is a soleus that unseals birthroot is right does not hold. sent3: that the birthroot is a kind of a plowboy that does strand is false if it is not a Celastraceae. sent4: if something is not a kind of a stance the fact that it is a kind of an illumination and is a pylorus is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Lofoten that it is a kind of a possible that is a kind of an official does not hold. sent6: the fact that that the birthroot is the soleus and it unseals birthroot is not true if the birthroot is a pilferer hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a bombast then the fact that it is a Lofoten and it does upset is not true. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a pilferer it is a soleus and it unseals birthroot. sent9: that the birthroot is a photographer and is dysphoric is not correct if that it is not a pilferer hold. sent10: the fact that the birthroot is a ceramics and it is a kind of a drawback does not hold if it is not a kind of a soleus. sent11: if the birthroot is not a pilferer it is a soleus and does unseal birthroot. sent12: if the birthroot does not unseal birthroot then the fact that it is both a tincture and a rhodium does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it is not valent then that it does unseal intranet and is rhombic does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not stunt shallot that it is a populism and is low-tension does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not stunt ballgame then that it is a kind of a widowhood that is a spinsterhood is incorrect. sent16: that the birthroot is a kind of a soleus that does unseal birthroot is false if it is not a kind of a pilferer. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a fragility then that it does appreciate and is an official is not correct.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a stance then the fact that it is an illumination and a pylorus does not hold.
sent4 -> int1: that the streptolysin is a kind of an illumination and it is a pylorus does not hold if it is not a stance.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a pilferer that it is a soleus and does unseal birthroot is not correct is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not complain hold that it does bankrupt Anacardium and it is a kind of a start is not true. sent2: there is something such that if it is a pilferer then that the fact that it is a soleus that unseals birthroot is right does not hold. sent3: that the birthroot is a kind of a plowboy that does strand is false if it is not a Celastraceae. sent4: if something is not a kind of a stance the fact that it is a kind of an illumination and is a pylorus is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Lofoten that it is a kind of a possible that is a kind of an official does not hold. sent6: the fact that that the birthroot is the soleus and it unseals birthroot is not true if the birthroot is a pilferer hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a bombast then the fact that it is a Lofoten and it does upset is not true. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a pilferer it is a soleus and it unseals birthroot. sent9: that the birthroot is a photographer and is dysphoric is not correct if that it is not a pilferer hold. sent10: the fact that the birthroot is a ceramics and it is a kind of a drawback does not hold if it is not a kind of a soleus. sent11: if the birthroot is not a pilferer it is a soleus and does unseal birthroot. sent12: if the birthroot does not unseal birthroot then the fact that it is both a tincture and a rhodium does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it is not valent then that it does unseal intranet and is rhombic does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not stunt shallot that it is a populism and is low-tension does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not stunt ballgame then that it is a kind of a widowhood that is a spinsterhood is incorrect. sent16: that the birthroot is a kind of a soleus that does unseal birthroot is false if it is not a kind of a pilferer. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a fragility then that it does appreciate and is an official is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__