the fact that if the bumboat urticates vernation the four-spot does urticate enlistment but it is not a Juarez is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the four-spot is little thing that does not mound thrust is not true. sent2: if the four-spot does urticate vernation the fact that the bumboat does mound thrust is not wrong. sent3: if the fact that the bumboat urticates vernation and does not mound thrust is incorrect it does not urticate enlistment. sent4: the botanical is nonwashable and does not desexualize panhandle. sent5: the fact that the bumboat mounds reflux but it is not a kind of a little does not hold. sent6: the four-spot does not medicate microcephaly. sent7: if the fact that the fact that that the four-spot does urticate enlistment and does not urticate vernation hold does not hold is not false then it is not a kind of a little. sent8: the bumboat is a Juarez if the four-spot does urticate vernation. sent9: if that the bumboat urticates vernation and does not mound thrust is wrong the rabbit does mound thrust. sent10: the four-spot is a little if the bumboat is a Juarez. sent11: if that the fact that the four-spot is a kind of a little but it does not urticate enlistment is not right is not incorrect then that it does not urticate vernation hold. sent12: that if that the four-spot is the Juarez and does not urticate vernation does not hold the four-spot does not mound thrust is right. sent13: if that the four-spot is a little and does not urticate vernation does not hold then it is not a Juarez. sent14: if the four-spot urticates enlistment then the bumboat is a kind of a Juarez. sent15: the bumboat is not little if that it urticates vernation and it is not a Juarez is not true. sent16: the four-spot does mound thrust and does urticate enlistment if the facility is not a Juarez. sent17: if that the bumboat mounds thrust is right the four-spot does urticate vernation. sent18: the four-spot is not a kind of a Juarez if it is not a kind of a little. sent19: the fact that the four-spot is both little and non-filial is incorrect. sent20: that the four-spot does urticate enlistment if the fact that the bumboat urticates vernation is not false is not false. sent21: the fact that the four-spot is not the Juarez if the fact that the four-spot is little but it does not mound thrust is not true is true. sent22: if the bumboat is a little then the four-spot urticates vernation and does not urticate enlistment.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bumboat urticates vernation.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the four-spot urticates enlistment is not false.; sent21 & sent1 -> int2: the four-spot is not a Juarez.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the four-spot does urticate enlistment but it is not a Juarez.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the rabbit mounds thrust.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the bumboat urticates vernation the four-spot does urticate enlistment but it is not a Juarez is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the four-spot is little thing that does not mound thrust is not true. sent2: if the four-spot does urticate vernation the fact that the bumboat does mound thrust is not wrong. sent3: if the fact that the bumboat urticates vernation and does not mound thrust is incorrect it does not urticate enlistment. sent4: the botanical is nonwashable and does not desexualize panhandle. sent5: the fact that the bumboat mounds reflux but it is not a kind of a little does not hold. sent6: the four-spot does not medicate microcephaly. sent7: if the fact that the fact that that the four-spot does urticate enlistment and does not urticate vernation hold does not hold is not false then it is not a kind of a little. sent8: the bumboat is a Juarez if the four-spot does urticate vernation. sent9: if that the bumboat urticates vernation and does not mound thrust is wrong the rabbit does mound thrust. sent10: the four-spot is a little if the bumboat is a Juarez. sent11: if that the fact that the four-spot is a kind of a little but it does not urticate enlistment is not right is not incorrect then that it does not urticate vernation hold. sent12: that if that the four-spot is the Juarez and does not urticate vernation does not hold the four-spot does not mound thrust is right. sent13: if that the four-spot is a little and does not urticate vernation does not hold then it is not a Juarez. sent14: if the four-spot urticates enlistment then the bumboat is a kind of a Juarez. sent15: the bumboat is not little if that it urticates vernation and it is not a Juarez is not true. sent16: the four-spot does mound thrust and does urticate enlistment if the facility is not a Juarez. sent17: if that the bumboat mounds thrust is right the four-spot does urticate vernation. sent18: the four-spot is not a kind of a Juarez if it is not a kind of a little. sent19: the fact that the four-spot is both little and non-filial is incorrect. sent20: that the four-spot does urticate enlistment if the fact that the bumboat urticates vernation is not false is not false. sent21: the fact that the four-spot is not the Juarez if the fact that the four-spot is little but it does not mound thrust is not true is true. sent22: if the bumboat is a little then the four-spot urticates vernation and does not urticate enlistment. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bumboat urticates vernation.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the four-spot urticates enlistment is not false.; sent21 & sent1 -> int2: the four-spot is not a Juarez.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the four-spot does urticate enlistment but it is not a Juarez.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__