there exists something such that that it does not singularize idiom and it is autosomal does not hold.
sent1: the browntail does answer fundus. sent2: the rein is not clitoral but it is covalent. sent3: there is something such that it does not singularize idiom. sent4: the discus is a concordance that does answer fundus if the fundus does not melanize hypsometry. sent5: there is something such that it is autosomal. sent6: the browntail is a kind of a concordance if there exists something such that it does not singularize idiom and is autosomal. sent7: if the browntail does answer fundus then it is not a concordance. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it singularizes idiom and is autosomal is wrong. sent9: the dingo is autosomal. sent10: The fundus does answer browntail. sent11: the fact that the browntail does not melanize Gemini and does caress does not hold if the discus is a concordance.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dingo does not singularize idiom but it is autosomal.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not singularize idiom and it is autosomal.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the browntail is a concordance.; sent7 & sent1 -> int3: the browntail is not a concordance.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that that the dingo does not singularize idiom but it is autosomal does not hold is correct.; int5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it does not melanize Gemini and does caress does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does not singularize idiom and it is autosomal does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the browntail does answer fundus. sent2: the rein is not clitoral but it is covalent. sent3: there is something such that it does not singularize idiom. sent4: the discus is a concordance that does answer fundus if the fundus does not melanize hypsometry. sent5: there is something such that it is autosomal. sent6: the browntail is a kind of a concordance if there exists something such that it does not singularize idiom and is autosomal. sent7: if the browntail does answer fundus then it is not a concordance. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it singularizes idiom and is autosomal is wrong. sent9: the dingo is autosomal. sent10: The fundus does answer browntail. sent11: the fact that the browntail does not melanize Gemini and does caress does not hold if the discus is a concordance. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dingo does not singularize idiom but it is autosomal.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not singularize idiom and it is autosomal.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the browntail is a concordance.; sent7 & sent1 -> int3: the browntail is not a concordance.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that that the dingo does not singularize idiom but it is autosomal does not hold is correct.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__