the fact that that the Romanceness does not occur and the psyop does not occur is false is correct.
sent1: that both the eulogizing hyssop and the apocrineness occurs is not true. sent2: if the authorization does not occur that both the glissade and the facilitating happens is not true. sent3: the looseness does not occur if that the glissade does not occur is not false. sent4: the authorization does not occur if the apocrineness happens. sent5: if that the glissading happens and the facilitating happens is wrong the looseness does not occur. sent6: the neuroanatomicness does not occur. sent7: the Gauguinesqueness does not occur if the divorcing happens. sent8: the splashing happens. sent9: the non-Romanceness and the non-neuroanatomicness happens. sent10: if the looseness does not occur then that the psyop does not occur is not wrong. sent11: the eulogizing hyssop does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the eulogizing hyssop but not the apocrineness happens is not correct then the authorization does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eulogizing hyssop but not the apocrineness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the eulogizing hyssop occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the eulogizing hyssop and the non-apocrineness happens is incorrect.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the authorization does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that both the glissade and the facilitating occurs is false.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the looseness does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the psyop does not occur.; sent9 -> int8: the Romanceness does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the Romanceness does not occur and the psyop does not occur is false is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the eulogizing hyssop and the apocrineness occurs is not true. sent2: if the authorization does not occur that both the glissade and the facilitating happens is not true. sent3: the looseness does not occur if that the glissade does not occur is not false. sent4: the authorization does not occur if the apocrineness happens. sent5: if that the glissading happens and the facilitating happens is wrong the looseness does not occur. sent6: the neuroanatomicness does not occur. sent7: the Gauguinesqueness does not occur if the divorcing happens. sent8: the splashing happens. sent9: the non-Romanceness and the non-neuroanatomicness happens. sent10: if the looseness does not occur then that the psyop does not occur is not wrong. sent11: the eulogizing hyssop does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the eulogizing hyssop but not the apocrineness happens is not correct then the authorization does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eulogizing hyssop but not the apocrineness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the eulogizing hyssop occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the eulogizing hyssop and the non-apocrineness happens is incorrect.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the authorization does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that both the glissade and the facilitating occurs is false.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the looseness does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the psyop does not occur.; sent9 -> int8: the Romanceness does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__