the epoxy does impel jersey but it is not a methenamine.
sent1: the fact that the incinerator is a kind of a methenamine and/or it does impel jersey is true. sent2: the incinerator is a parlor. sent3: the fact that the epoxy does impel jersey and is not a kind of a methenamine is false if the phosphine is not a kind of a coloring. sent4: the incinerator is not a kind of a glockenspiel if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a duplicate. sent5: the incinerator is a glockenspiel if it does not shun beatification and it does not flump. sent6: the caster is a parlor if that the incinerator is a chuck is correct. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it bastinados wakefulness and is not coloring is false. sent8: if the caster does not bastinado wakefulness and is branchial the phosphine does not color. sent9: the jersey is branchial. sent10: the incinerator is not a coloring if it is a kind of a methenamine and/or it does impel jersey. sent11: if the fact that something is a kind of a glockenspiel but it does not chuck is not correct it does impel jersey. sent12: something is not a kind of a glockenspiel if it is branchial and it is not a parlor. sent13: if the fact that the incinerator does not shun beatification and it does not flump is not correct then it chucks. sent14: if the caster is a parlor it does not bastinado wakefulness and is branchial. sent15: something is not a duplicate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incinerator does not shun beatification and does not flump.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the incinerator is a glockenspiel.; sent15 & sent4 -> int2: the incinerator is not a glockenspiel.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the incinerator does not shun beatification and it does not flump is wrong.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the incinerator is a kind of a chuck.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the caster is a parlor.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: that the caster does not bastinado wakefulness and is branchial is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the phosphine is not a coloring.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the jersey bastinados wakefulness.
sent12 -> int9: if the jersey is both branchial and not a parlor then it is not a glockenspiel.; sent10 & sent1 -> int10: the incinerator is not coloring.; int10 -> int11: something is not a coloring.;
$hypothesis$ = the epoxy does impel jersey but it is not a methenamine. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the incinerator is a kind of a methenamine and/or it does impel jersey is true. sent2: the incinerator is a parlor. sent3: the fact that the epoxy does impel jersey and is not a kind of a methenamine is false if the phosphine is not a kind of a coloring. sent4: the incinerator is not a kind of a glockenspiel if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a duplicate. sent5: the incinerator is a glockenspiel if it does not shun beatification and it does not flump. sent6: the caster is a parlor if that the incinerator is a chuck is correct. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it bastinados wakefulness and is not coloring is false. sent8: if the caster does not bastinado wakefulness and is branchial the phosphine does not color. sent9: the jersey is branchial. sent10: the incinerator is not a coloring if it is a kind of a methenamine and/or it does impel jersey. sent11: if the fact that something is a kind of a glockenspiel but it does not chuck is not correct it does impel jersey. sent12: something is not a kind of a glockenspiel if it is branchial and it is not a parlor. sent13: if the fact that the incinerator does not shun beatification and it does not flump is not correct then it chucks. sent14: if the caster is a parlor it does not bastinado wakefulness and is branchial. sent15: something is not a duplicate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incinerator does not shun beatification and does not flump.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the incinerator is a glockenspiel.; sent15 & sent4 -> int2: the incinerator is not a glockenspiel.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the incinerator does not shun beatification and it does not flump is wrong.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the incinerator is a kind of a chuck.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the caster is a parlor.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: that the caster does not bastinado wakefulness and is branchial is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the phosphine is not a coloring.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__