the sloth does pulsate and does not assail.
sent1: the fact that if something that varnishes aconite is faithful then it does not pulsate is not incorrect. sent2: if the pedant does not ignore approval the tyramine ignore approval but it is not citric. sent3: that the sloth pulsates but it does not assail is not true if the ruddles does not pulsates. sent4: if the tyramine ignores approval and is not citric then the ruddles is a kind of a faithful. sent5: that the boulle either is alkalotic or is a Sanicula or both is right. sent6: if the ruddles is not a bluff it is occupational and it does varnish aconite. sent7: if the fact that the boulle is alkalotic and/or it is a kind of a Sanicula is true the ruddles does not bluff. sent8: the pedant does not varnish downrightness and does not ignore approval.
sent8 -> int1: the pedant does not ignore approval.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the tyramine ignores approval but it is not citric.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the ruddles is a faithful.; sent7 & sent5 -> int4: the ruddles is not a bluff.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: that the ruddles is occupational thing that does varnish aconite hold.; int5 -> int6: the ruddles varnishes aconite.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the ruddles varnishes aconite and it is a kind of a faithful.; sent1 -> int8: if the ruddles does varnish aconite and it is a faithful then it does not pulsate.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the ruddles does not pulsate.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sloth does pulsate and does not assail. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if something that varnishes aconite is faithful then it does not pulsate is not incorrect. sent2: if the pedant does not ignore approval the tyramine ignore approval but it is not citric. sent3: that the sloth pulsates but it does not assail is not true if the ruddles does not pulsates. sent4: if the tyramine ignores approval and is not citric then the ruddles is a kind of a faithful. sent5: that the boulle either is alkalotic or is a Sanicula or both is right. sent6: if the ruddles is not a bluff it is occupational and it does varnish aconite. sent7: if the fact that the boulle is alkalotic and/or it is a kind of a Sanicula is true the ruddles does not bluff. sent8: the pedant does not varnish downrightness and does not ignore approval. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the pedant does not ignore approval.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the tyramine ignores approval but it is not citric.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the ruddles is a faithful.; sent7 & sent5 -> int4: the ruddles is not a bluff.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: that the ruddles is occupational thing that does varnish aconite hold.; int5 -> int6: the ruddles varnishes aconite.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the ruddles varnishes aconite and it is a kind of a faithful.; sent1 -> int8: if the ruddles does varnish aconite and it is a faithful then it does not pulsate.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the ruddles does not pulsate.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__