if the cubbyhole is a lozenge that it is a gillie is correct.
sent1: the currant is not an advocate. sent2: the raft is not a lozenge. sent3: if something that does not despair giddiness is a kind of a lozenge then that it is a gillie is not incorrect. sent4: the Dipper is a kind of a hostess if the fact that it is not a Veratrum but a sporocarp hold. sent5: the fact that the broody does not rustle enchantress hold. sent6: the cubbyhole is a FDA. sent7: if the cubbyhole does not rustle enchantress then the fact that it is not an advocate or is not a Romany or both is wrong. sent8: the fact that if the cubbyhole does not rustle enchantress the cubbyhole is Romany hold. sent9: the fact that the articulator either is not camphoric or does not unspell currant or both is false if it does not despair giddiness. sent10: the nubbin is an advocate. sent11: that the cubbyhole is not billiards hold. sent12: that the cubbyhole is not a kind of a pleasance or does not ejaculate or both is not right. sent13: if that the cubbyhole is an advocate is not false then it is a bock. sent14: if that either something is not an advocate or it is a Romany or both does not hold it does not despair giddiness. sent15: that if the fact that something either is not a kind of an advocate or is not Romany or both is not correct then it does not despair giddiness is right. sent16: the cubbyhole is sarcolemmal. sent17: the cubbyhole does not rustle enchantress. sent18: the cubbyhole is a kind of a right. sent19: the cubbyhole is a heel if it is not a Romany. sent20: The enchantress does not rustle cubbyhole. sent21: the cubbyhole lengthens. sent22: the cubbyhole is a Romany.
sent7 & sent17 -> int1: that the cubbyhole either is not an advocate or is not a Romany or both is wrong.; sent15 -> int2: if the fact that either the cubbyhole is not an advocate or it is not Romany or both is not correct it does not despair giddiness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cubbyhole does not despair giddiness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cubbyhole is a lozenge.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the cubbyhole does not despair giddiness and is a lozenge.; sent3 -> int5: the fact that the cubbyhole is a gillie is correct if it does not despair giddiness and it is a lozenge.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the cubbyhole is a gillie.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the cubbyhole is a lozenge that it is a gillie is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the currant is not an advocate. sent2: the raft is not a lozenge. sent3: if something that does not despair giddiness is a kind of a lozenge then that it is a gillie is not incorrect. sent4: the Dipper is a kind of a hostess if the fact that it is not a Veratrum but a sporocarp hold. sent5: the fact that the broody does not rustle enchantress hold. sent6: the cubbyhole is a FDA. sent7: if the cubbyhole does not rustle enchantress then the fact that it is not an advocate or is not a Romany or both is wrong. sent8: the fact that if the cubbyhole does not rustle enchantress the cubbyhole is Romany hold. sent9: the fact that the articulator either is not camphoric or does not unspell currant or both is false if it does not despair giddiness. sent10: the nubbin is an advocate. sent11: that the cubbyhole is not billiards hold. sent12: that the cubbyhole is not a kind of a pleasance or does not ejaculate or both is not right. sent13: if that the cubbyhole is an advocate is not false then it is a bock. sent14: if that either something is not an advocate or it is a Romany or both does not hold it does not despair giddiness. sent15: that if the fact that something either is not a kind of an advocate or is not Romany or both is not correct then it does not despair giddiness is right. sent16: the cubbyhole is sarcolemmal. sent17: the cubbyhole does not rustle enchantress. sent18: the cubbyhole is a kind of a right. sent19: the cubbyhole is a heel if it is not a Romany. sent20: The enchantress does not rustle cubbyhole. sent21: the cubbyhole lengthens. sent22: the cubbyhole is a Romany. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent17 -> int1: that the cubbyhole either is not an advocate or is not a Romany or both is wrong.; sent15 -> int2: if the fact that either the cubbyhole is not an advocate or it is not Romany or both is not correct it does not despair giddiness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cubbyhole does not despair giddiness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cubbyhole is a lozenge.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the cubbyhole does not despair giddiness and is a lozenge.; sent3 -> int5: the fact that the cubbyhole is a gillie is correct if it does not despair giddiness and it is a lozenge.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the cubbyhole is a gillie.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__