the fact that the Gabonese is military and does not devein gaur is wrong.
sent1: the aztreonam is not nocturnal. sent2: the coral is irreverent if the Gabonese is a military and does not devein gaur. sent3: that the coral is sessile but it is not nocturnal is incorrect. sent4: the obsidian does devein gaur. sent5: the aztreonam is not a diameter. sent6: the aztreonam is irreverent. sent7: if the Gabonese is a kind of military thing that deveins gaur the coral is irreverent. sent8: the obsidian is nutritional if the fact that it is not a diameter and not irreverent is false. sent9: if the coral is irreverent that the Gabonese does not devein gaur and is not irreverent does not hold. sent10: the shedding is cataclinal but it is not nocturnal. sent11: the fact that the obsidian is a diameter and is a kind of a Godunov is wrong. sent12: the aztreonam is nocturnal if that it is a kind of a Godunov is not wrong. sent13: the coral deveins gaur if the Gabonese is irreverent. sent14: the Gabonese is irreverent. sent15: if the obsidian is nutritional then the aztreonam is a kind of a Godunov. sent16: that the aztreonam is a stomacher is not incorrect. sent17: the fact that the aztreonam is merciful thing that is not a Godunov does not hold. sent18: that the coral is a kind of non-irreverent thing that is not a kind of a military is not true. sent19: the fact that the obsidian is a diameter but it is not irreverent is not right. sent20: the coral does devein gaur if the obsidian is irreverent and is not a diameter. sent21: the fact that the obsidian is both a diameter and not irreverent is false if the coral is irreverent. sent22: the dulse is irreverent. sent23: the coral is nutritional.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gabonese is a kind of a military and does not devein gaur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the coral is irreverent.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Gabonese is military and does not devein gaur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the aztreonam is not nocturnal. sent2: the coral is irreverent if the Gabonese is a military and does not devein gaur. sent3: that the coral is sessile but it is not nocturnal is incorrect. sent4: the obsidian does devein gaur. sent5: the aztreonam is not a diameter. sent6: the aztreonam is irreverent. sent7: if the Gabonese is a kind of military thing that deveins gaur the coral is irreverent. sent8: the obsidian is nutritional if the fact that it is not a diameter and not irreverent is false. sent9: if the coral is irreverent that the Gabonese does not devein gaur and is not irreverent does not hold. sent10: the shedding is cataclinal but it is not nocturnal. sent11: the fact that the obsidian is a diameter and is a kind of a Godunov is wrong. sent12: the aztreonam is nocturnal if that it is a kind of a Godunov is not wrong. sent13: the coral deveins gaur if the Gabonese is irreverent. sent14: the Gabonese is irreverent. sent15: if the obsidian is nutritional then the aztreonam is a kind of a Godunov. sent16: that the aztreonam is a stomacher is not incorrect. sent17: the fact that the aztreonam is merciful thing that is not a Godunov does not hold. sent18: that the coral is a kind of non-irreverent thing that is not a kind of a military is not true. sent19: the fact that the obsidian is a diameter but it is not irreverent is not right. sent20: the coral does devein gaur if the obsidian is irreverent and is not a diameter. sent21: the fact that the obsidian is both a diameter and not irreverent is false if the coral is irreverent. sent22: the dulse is irreverent. sent23: the coral is nutritional. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gabonese is a kind of a military and does not devein gaur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the coral is irreverent.; __UNKNOWN__