the fact that the stylite is not aneuploid but it is a bromide is not true if the Milanese is a peripatetic.
sent1: the stylite is not aneuploid but cervine. sent2: the Milanese is heliocentric if there is something such that the fact that it elapses and/or it does not stratify moderation is not correct. sent3: the fact that the stylite is not aneuploid but it is a bromide is not correct if the ancestress is not cervine. sent4: the fact that the kvass elapses and/or it does not stratify moderation does not hold.
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that that either it elapses or it does not stratify moderation or both is false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Milanese is heliocentric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Milanese is a peripatetic.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: that the Milanese is both heliocentric and a peripatetic hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stylite is not aneuploid but it is a bromide is not true if the Milanese is a peripatetic. ; $context$ = sent1: the stylite is not aneuploid but cervine. sent2: the Milanese is heliocentric if there is something such that the fact that it elapses and/or it does not stratify moderation is not correct. sent3: the fact that the stylite is not aneuploid but it is a bromide is not correct if the ancestress is not cervine. sent4: the fact that the kvass elapses and/or it does not stratify moderation does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that that either it elapses or it does not stratify moderation or both is false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Milanese is heliocentric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Milanese is a peripatetic.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: that the Milanese is both heliocentric and a peripatetic hold.; __UNKNOWN__