the fact that the corvette is not a Raphus and it is non-muciferous is not wrong.
sent1: if the corvette is biologistic then it is not muciferous. sent2: the viewers is not counterfeit and does dispatch. sent3: the monochromat is a acaricide. sent4: the corvette is not muciferous. sent5: the percolation is not a Raphus. sent6: if the percolation is not non-ordinary it is not a counterfeit and it is not ameboid. sent7: the corvette does cane if the percolation is biologistic. sent8: if the viewers is ameboid but it is not an ordinary then the corvette is not biologistic. sent9: the monochromat is a kind of a shambles. sent10: if the ricegrass is unwomanly the percolation is an expanse but it is not a cane. sent11: if the viewers is not a counterfeit but it is a kind of a dispatch it is not a kind of an ordinary. sent12: that something is not a Raphus and it is not muciferous does not hold if it is not biologistic. sent13: if the viewers is not an ordinary the percolation is ameboid and is biologistic.
sent11 & sent2 -> int1: the viewers is not a kind of an ordinary.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the percolation is ameboid and biologistic.; int2 -> int3: the percolation is biologistic.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the corvette canes.;
that that the corvette is not a Raphus and not muciferous is wrong hold.
sent12 -> int5: if the fact that the corvette is non-biologistic hold then that it is not a Raphus and not muciferous does not hold.; sent3 & sent9 -> int6: the monochromat is a acaricide and it is a kind of a shambles.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a acaricide and it is a kind of a shambles.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the corvette is not a Raphus and it is non-muciferous is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the corvette is biologistic then it is not muciferous. sent2: the viewers is not counterfeit and does dispatch. sent3: the monochromat is a acaricide. sent4: the corvette is not muciferous. sent5: the percolation is not a Raphus. sent6: if the percolation is not non-ordinary it is not a counterfeit and it is not ameboid. sent7: the corvette does cane if the percolation is biologistic. sent8: if the viewers is ameboid but it is not an ordinary then the corvette is not biologistic. sent9: the monochromat is a kind of a shambles. sent10: if the ricegrass is unwomanly the percolation is an expanse but it is not a cane. sent11: if the viewers is not a counterfeit but it is a kind of a dispatch it is not a kind of an ordinary. sent12: that something is not a Raphus and it is not muciferous does not hold if it is not biologistic. sent13: if the viewers is not an ordinary the percolation is ameboid and is biologistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent2 -> int1: the viewers is not a kind of an ordinary.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the percolation is ameboid and biologistic.; int2 -> int3: the percolation is biologistic.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the corvette canes.; __UNKNOWN__