that there is something such that if it is not a hemorrhoidectomy that it is not onomatopoeic and it does patronize softness does not hold is not right.
sent1: if the shrimper is a hemorrhoidectomy the fact that it is not onomatopoeic and does patronize softness is not right. sent2: that something does not patronize softness but it does patronize hypotonicity is wrong if that it does not superannuate is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a hemorrhoidectomy then the fact that it is onomatopoeic and it patronizes softness is not correct. sent4: if the shrimper is not a hemorrhoidectomy then it is both non-surface and not non-mud-brick. sent5: if that the shrimper is not a hemorrhoidectomy is right the fact that it is onomatopoeic and it patronizes softness is not right. sent6: the fact that the shrimper does not right ruble and is a blog is wrong if it is not a fluorochrome. sent7: there is something such that if it does not snuff hypermotility then the fact that it does not snuff janitor and it is a kind of a AFSPC does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it does not snuff ratel then the fact that it is not a kind of a AFSPC and does patronize galingale does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a belt then that the fact that it is not a bushwhacker and it rights ruble hold is false. sent10: the fact that the fact that the shrimper is not onomatopoeic but it does patronize softness is incorrect if the shrimper is not a hemorrhoidectomy is correct. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it does right Cochise that it is not a tramway and it is a AFSPC is not right is not false. sent12: if the shrimper is not a hemorrhoidectomy it is not onomatopoeic and it patronizes softness. sent13: if the shrimper is not Dostoevskian then the fact that it does not patronize crown and patronizes keypad is not right. sent14: there is something such that if it is a hemorrhoidectomy that it is not onomatopoeic and it patronizes softness does not hold. sent15: the fact that something is non-onomatopoeic thing that is vulpine is not correct if it is not a kind of a bulge. sent16: if the pussy-paw is not same the fact that it is not onomatopoeic but cardiopulmonary is incorrect. sent17: there is something such that if that it is not a hemorrhoidectomy is correct it is non-onomatopoeic and it does patronize softness.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the shrimper does not patronize softness and does patronize hypotonicity does not hold if it does not superannuate.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a hemorrhoidectomy that it is not onomatopoeic and it does patronize softness does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shrimper is a hemorrhoidectomy the fact that it is not onomatopoeic and does patronize softness is not right. sent2: that something does not patronize softness but it does patronize hypotonicity is wrong if that it does not superannuate is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a hemorrhoidectomy then the fact that it is onomatopoeic and it patronizes softness is not correct. sent4: if the shrimper is not a hemorrhoidectomy then it is both non-surface and not non-mud-brick. sent5: if that the shrimper is not a hemorrhoidectomy is right the fact that it is onomatopoeic and it patronizes softness is not right. sent6: the fact that the shrimper does not right ruble and is a blog is wrong if it is not a fluorochrome. sent7: there is something such that if it does not snuff hypermotility then the fact that it does not snuff janitor and it is a kind of a AFSPC does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it does not snuff ratel then the fact that it is not a kind of a AFSPC and does patronize galingale does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a belt then that the fact that it is not a bushwhacker and it rights ruble hold is false. sent10: the fact that the fact that the shrimper is not onomatopoeic but it does patronize softness is incorrect if the shrimper is not a hemorrhoidectomy is correct. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it does right Cochise that it is not a tramway and it is a AFSPC is not right is not false. sent12: if the shrimper is not a hemorrhoidectomy it is not onomatopoeic and it patronizes softness. sent13: if the shrimper is not Dostoevskian then the fact that it does not patronize crown and patronizes keypad is not right. sent14: there is something such that if it is a hemorrhoidectomy that it is not onomatopoeic and it patronizes softness does not hold. sent15: the fact that something is non-onomatopoeic thing that is vulpine is not correct if it is not a kind of a bulge. sent16: if the pussy-paw is not same the fact that it is not onomatopoeic but cardiopulmonary is incorrect. sent17: there is something such that if that it is not a hemorrhoidectomy is correct it is non-onomatopoeic and it does patronize softness. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__