that the nap does not occur is correct.
sent1: the fact that the Parisianness occurs and the shattering carry occurs does not hold if the latheriness does not occur. sent2: the puncturing occurs. sent3: the fact that either the fish does not occur or the Aleutiansness does not occur or both is not true if the anureticness occurs. sent4: if the puncturing happens then the fact that the accountantship occurs and the dysplasticness does not occur is wrong. sent5: that the incitation happens and the involuntariness does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the crystallizing coolant does not occur results in that the accountantship but not the dysplasticness happens. sent7: the napping happens and the crystallizing coolant happens if the idle does not occur. sent8: the fact that the idleness does not occur and/or the shattering carry does not occur is not correct if the crystallizing coolant occurs. sent9: the fact that the accountantship occurs and the dysplasticness happens is wrong if the puncturing happens. sent10: if the fact that either the idle does not occur or the shattering carry does not occur or both is wrong the Parisianness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crystallizing coolant does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: both the accountantship and the non-dysplasticness occurs.; sent4 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the accountantship and the non-dysplasticness happens is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the crystallizing coolant occurs hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that either the idleness does not occur or the shattering carry does not occur or both does not hold.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the Parisian occurs.; int6 -> int7: the latheriness and/or the Parisianness occurs.;
the napping happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the nap does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Parisianness occurs and the shattering carry occurs does not hold if the latheriness does not occur. sent2: the puncturing occurs. sent3: the fact that either the fish does not occur or the Aleutiansness does not occur or both is not true if the anureticness occurs. sent4: if the puncturing happens then the fact that the accountantship occurs and the dysplasticness does not occur is wrong. sent5: that the incitation happens and the involuntariness does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the crystallizing coolant does not occur results in that the accountantship but not the dysplasticness happens. sent7: the napping happens and the crystallizing coolant happens if the idle does not occur. sent8: the fact that the idleness does not occur and/or the shattering carry does not occur is not correct if the crystallizing coolant occurs. sent9: the fact that the accountantship occurs and the dysplasticness happens is wrong if the puncturing happens. sent10: if the fact that either the idle does not occur or the shattering carry does not occur or both is wrong the Parisianness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crystallizing coolant does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: both the accountantship and the non-dysplasticness occurs.; sent4 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the accountantship and the non-dysplasticness happens is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the crystallizing coolant occurs hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that either the idleness does not occur or the shattering carry does not occur or both does not hold.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the Parisian occurs.; int6 -> int7: the latheriness and/or the Parisianness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__