the fact that the binary is a Vilnius and it brads blender is not right.
sent1: something is not a polish and/or it is hyaloplasmic if it is not a augend. sent2: the oca is not a kind of a cut-in if it is hyaloplasmic and is not a augend. sent3: the binary does brad blender if there exists something such that that it is non-departmental and does not brad blender is not correct. sent4: the oca does not polish. sent5: something is a kind of a polish if that it is not a polish and it is a kind of a Vilnius is incorrect. sent6: something does not master logician. sent7: the binary is a Vilnius if the oca is a kind of a augend. sent8: the oca is not a kind of a cut-in if it is a kind of hyaloplasmic a augend. sent9: that the oca does master loungewear is correct. sent10: the fact that something either is not a Suez or is a polish or both is not true if that it is a sericulturist hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not departmental and does not brad blender is not correct. sent12: there exists something such that that it is departmental and it does not brad blender does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not research and it is not a Pagophila is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that it is not departmental and does not brad blender. sent15: something is not a Suez if that it does not brad blender and/or is a kind of a sericulturist is not true. sent16: the binary is a Vilnius if the fact that the oca is hyaloplasmic but not a augend is not true. sent17: the fact that the oca is hyaloplasmic and it is a augend does not hold. sent18: something is not a kind of a Suez or it is a polish or both if it is not a cut-in. sent19: the blender is a cut-in if the oca does polish. sent20: the oca is a sericulturist and it does master loungewear. sent21: there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-departmental thing that does brad blender does not hold. sent22: the oca is not a polish if it is a sericulturist. sent23: if there is something such that it does not master logician then the binary is a kind of non-departmental thing that does not master loungewear. sent24: something is not a polish if that it is a kind of a sericulturist is true. sent25: that the oca is not a kind of a augend is not wrong. sent26: the binary brads blender if there is something such that it does brads blender. sent27: the fact that something is a Vilnius and it does brad blender does not hold if it is not a polish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oca is hyaloplasmic but it is not a augend.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the oca is not a cut-in.; sent18 -> int2: the oca is not a Suez and/or it is a polish if it is not a cut-in.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the oca is not a Suez and/or is a polish.; sent10 -> int4: if the oca is a kind of a sericulturist then that it either is not a Suez or is a polish or both is false.; sent20 -> int5: that the oca is a sericulturist is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that either the oca is not a Suez or it is a kind of a polish or both is wrong.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the oca is hyaloplasmic but it is not a augend is not right.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the binary is a Vilnius.; sent11 & sent3 -> int10: the binary does brad blender.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the blender is a cut-in.
sent5 -> int11: the oca does polish if the fact that it is not a polish and it is a Vilnius is not right.; sent15 -> int12: if the fact that the oca does not brad blender or it is a sericulturist or both does not hold it is not a Suez.; sent6 & sent23 -> int13: the binary is not departmental and does not master loungewear.; int13 -> int14: the binary does not master loungewear.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it does not master loungewear.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the binary is a Vilnius and it brads blender is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a polish and/or it is hyaloplasmic if it is not a augend. sent2: the oca is not a kind of a cut-in if it is hyaloplasmic and is not a augend. sent3: the binary does brad blender if there exists something such that that it is non-departmental and does not brad blender is not correct. sent4: the oca does not polish. sent5: something is a kind of a polish if that it is not a polish and it is a kind of a Vilnius is incorrect. sent6: something does not master logician. sent7: the binary is a Vilnius if the oca is a kind of a augend. sent8: the oca is not a kind of a cut-in if it is a kind of hyaloplasmic a augend. sent9: that the oca does master loungewear is correct. sent10: the fact that something either is not a Suez or is a polish or both is not true if that it is a sericulturist hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not departmental and does not brad blender is not correct. sent12: there exists something such that that it is departmental and it does not brad blender does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not research and it is not a Pagophila is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that it is not departmental and does not brad blender. sent15: something is not a Suez if that it does not brad blender and/or is a kind of a sericulturist is not true. sent16: the binary is a Vilnius if the fact that the oca is hyaloplasmic but not a augend is not true. sent17: the fact that the oca is hyaloplasmic and it is a augend does not hold. sent18: something is not a kind of a Suez or it is a polish or both if it is not a cut-in. sent19: the blender is a cut-in if the oca does polish. sent20: the oca is a sericulturist and it does master loungewear. sent21: there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-departmental thing that does brad blender does not hold. sent22: the oca is not a polish if it is a sericulturist. sent23: if there is something such that it does not master logician then the binary is a kind of non-departmental thing that does not master loungewear. sent24: something is not a polish if that it is a kind of a sericulturist is true. sent25: that the oca is not a kind of a augend is not wrong. sent26: the binary brads blender if there is something such that it does brads blender. sent27: the fact that something is a Vilnius and it does brad blender does not hold if it is not a polish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oca is hyaloplasmic but it is not a augend.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the oca is not a cut-in.; sent18 -> int2: the oca is not a Suez and/or it is a polish if it is not a cut-in.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the oca is not a Suez and/or is a polish.; sent10 -> int4: if the oca is a kind of a sericulturist then that it either is not a Suez or is a polish or both is false.; sent20 -> int5: that the oca is a sericulturist is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that either the oca is not a Suez or it is a kind of a polish or both is wrong.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the oca is hyaloplasmic but it is not a augend is not right.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the binary is a Vilnius.; sent11 & sent3 -> int10: the binary does brad blender.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__