the enema occurs and the activation occurs.
sent1: the relaxation occurs. sent2: the intramuscularness does not occur. sent3: that the feeling occurs is prevented by that the authorization happens and the attentiveness occurs. sent4: the enema happens if that the inconvertibleness but not the yoga occurs is false. sent5: the oneiricness but not the flocking Idahoan happens. sent6: the fact that the inconvertibleness and the yoga happens is not true. sent7: that the preoccupancy and the overbalancing happens is caused by the non-intramuscularness. sent8: if the inconvertibleness but not the yoga occurs that the philandering abridger does not occur hold. sent9: the overbalancing occurs. sent10: the horseshow occurs. sent11: if the inconvertibleness and the yoga happens the philandering abridger does not occur. sent12: the preoccupancy does not occur if that the cathecting Bunuel occurs and the Germanic happens is not true. sent13: both the relaxation and the activation happens. sent14: the fact that the cathecting Bunuel happens and the Germanic occurs is wrong if the philandering abridger does not occur. sent15: if the cathecting Bunuel does not occur then the preoccupancy does not occur. sent16: that the intralinguisticness happens and the stoichiometricness happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inconvertibleness occurs but the yoga does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the philandering abridger does not occur.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the cathecting Bunuel and the Germanic occurs is not correct.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the preoccupancy does not occur.; sent7 & sent2 -> int4: both the preoccupancy and the overbalancing happens.; int4 -> int5: that the preoccupancy happens is right.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the inconvertibleness occurs and the yoga does not occur is incorrect.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the enema occurs.; sent13 -> int9: the activation occurs.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the enema occurs and the activation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the relaxation occurs. sent2: the intramuscularness does not occur. sent3: that the feeling occurs is prevented by that the authorization happens and the attentiveness occurs. sent4: the enema happens if that the inconvertibleness but not the yoga occurs is false. sent5: the oneiricness but not the flocking Idahoan happens. sent6: the fact that the inconvertibleness and the yoga happens is not true. sent7: that the preoccupancy and the overbalancing happens is caused by the non-intramuscularness. sent8: if the inconvertibleness but not the yoga occurs that the philandering abridger does not occur hold. sent9: the overbalancing occurs. sent10: the horseshow occurs. sent11: if the inconvertibleness and the yoga happens the philandering abridger does not occur. sent12: the preoccupancy does not occur if that the cathecting Bunuel occurs and the Germanic happens is not true. sent13: both the relaxation and the activation happens. sent14: the fact that the cathecting Bunuel happens and the Germanic occurs is wrong if the philandering abridger does not occur. sent15: if the cathecting Bunuel does not occur then the preoccupancy does not occur. sent16: that the intralinguisticness happens and the stoichiometricness happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inconvertibleness occurs but the yoga does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the philandering abridger does not occur.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the cathecting Bunuel and the Germanic occurs is not correct.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the preoccupancy does not occur.; sent7 & sent2 -> int4: both the preoccupancy and the overbalancing happens.; int4 -> int5: that the preoccupancy happens is right.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the inconvertibleness occurs and the yoga does not occur is incorrect.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the enema occurs.; sent13 -> int9: the activation occurs.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__