the emblazoning convincingness does not occur.
sent1: that the stalling does not occur and the barratry does not occur is wrong if the excommunication occurs. sent2: either the barratry occurs or the emblazoning convincingness happens or both if the stalling does not occur. sent3: if that the emblazoning convincingness does not occur is not incorrect the barratry does not occur. sent4: the settling ladder does not occur. sent5: the barratry happens and the stalling happens. sent6: that the answer does not occur is caused by that the epic does not occur. sent7: the adrenalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emblazoning convincingness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the barratry does not occur is not wrong.; sent5 -> int2: the barratry occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Frankishness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the emblazoning convincingness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the stalling does not occur and the barratry does not occur is wrong if the excommunication occurs. sent2: either the barratry occurs or the emblazoning convincingness happens or both if the stalling does not occur. sent3: if that the emblazoning convincingness does not occur is not incorrect the barratry does not occur. sent4: the settling ladder does not occur. sent5: the barratry happens and the stalling happens. sent6: that the answer does not occur is caused by that the epic does not occur. sent7: the adrenalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emblazoning convincingness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the barratry does not occur is not wrong.; sent5 -> int2: the barratry occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__