the fact that if the sparer is a plane that the oxtongue is non-prismatic thing that does not wheel slurred is not false is false.
sent1: the oxtongue is both not a niacin and not endoparasitic if it outgenerals sparer. sent2: if something does not shore flammability the fact that it is a kind of a jabber and/or it is not prismatic is not right. sent3: the Taiwanese wheels slurred. sent4: if something does not billow pedestrian it does not shore flammability. sent5: if that the fact that the incurable is a jabber or is not prismatic or both hold is not correct then the sparer is not prismatic. sent6: the oxtongue does not wheel slurred. sent7: if the sparer is not prismatic the sandstone does not wheel slurred but it does plane. sent8: if the incurable does not wheel slurred the oxtongue is not prismatic and it does not wheel slurred. sent9: the oxtongue is prismatic but it does not wheel slurred. sent10: the incurable does not wheel slurred if the sparer planes.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sparer is a plane.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the incurable does not wheel slurred.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the oxtongue is non-prismatic thing that does not wheel slurred.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the sandstone does not wheel slurred.
sent2 -> int3: if the fact that the incurable does not shore flammability is right then that it is a jabber and/or is not prismatic is wrong.; sent4 -> int4: the incurable does not shore flammability if it does not billow pedestrian.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the sparer is a plane that the oxtongue is non-prismatic thing that does not wheel slurred is not false is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the oxtongue is both not a niacin and not endoparasitic if it outgenerals sparer. sent2: if something does not shore flammability the fact that it is a kind of a jabber and/or it is not prismatic is not right. sent3: the Taiwanese wheels slurred. sent4: if something does not billow pedestrian it does not shore flammability. sent5: if that the fact that the incurable is a jabber or is not prismatic or both hold is not correct then the sparer is not prismatic. sent6: the oxtongue does not wheel slurred. sent7: if the sparer is not prismatic the sandstone does not wheel slurred but it does plane. sent8: if the incurable does not wheel slurred the oxtongue is not prismatic and it does not wheel slurred. sent9: the oxtongue is prismatic but it does not wheel slurred. sent10: the incurable does not wheel slurred if the sparer planes. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sparer is a plane.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the incurable does not wheel slurred.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the oxtongue is non-prismatic thing that does not wheel slurred.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__