the fact that the fact that the polymastigote does not hedge weed and is a kind of a solitaire is not correct is not false.
sent1: that the polymastigote hedges weed and is a kind of a solitaire is not correct. sent2: the fact that the polymastigote does not hedge Durio and is Anglo-catholic is not right. sent3: if the polymastigote is not a kind of a absorbance then the fact that it hedges weed and it is a solitaire is not correct. sent4: the fact that something does not hedge weed and is a kind of a solitaire is incorrect if it is not a kind of a absorbance. sent5: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a assenter and it is not respectable is not incorrect is not right. sent6: if there is something such that it is respectable then the polymastigote is not a absorbance. sent7: something is both a assenter and not respectable. sent8: there is something such that that it is a assenter and it is respectable is incorrect. sent9: if something is a absorbance then it does not hedge weed and is a kind of a solitaire.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the polymastigote does not hedge weed and is a kind of the solitaire does not hold if the polymastigote is not a absorbance is not false.;
the polymastigote does not hedge weed but it is a solitaire.
sent9 -> int2: if the polymastigote is a kind of a absorbance it does not hedge weed and it is a solitaire.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the polymastigote does not hedge weed and is a kind of a solitaire is not correct is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the polymastigote hedges weed and is a kind of a solitaire is not correct. sent2: the fact that the polymastigote does not hedge Durio and is Anglo-catholic is not right. sent3: if the polymastigote is not a kind of a absorbance then the fact that it hedges weed and it is a solitaire is not correct. sent4: the fact that something does not hedge weed and is a kind of a solitaire is incorrect if it is not a kind of a absorbance. sent5: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a assenter and it is not respectable is not incorrect is not right. sent6: if there is something such that it is respectable then the polymastigote is not a absorbance. sent7: something is both a assenter and not respectable. sent8: there is something such that that it is a assenter and it is respectable is incorrect. sent9: if something is a absorbance then it does not hedge weed and is a kind of a solitaire. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the polymastigote does not hedge weed and is a kind of the solitaire does not hold if the polymastigote is not a absorbance is not false.; __UNKNOWN__