the departmentalness and the Ukrainianness occurs.
sent1: both the Ukrainianness and the feverishness occurs. sent2: the stubbing lacertid occurs. sent3: that the stubbing lacertid and the orthopedicsness happens leads to that the congressionalness does not occur. sent4: the sliming esthete happens and the congressionalness happens. sent5: the non-orthopedicsness triggers that both the departmentalness and the insectanness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orthopedicsness happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the stubbing lacertid and the orthopedicsness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the congressionalness does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the congressionalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the orthopedicsness does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: both the departmentalness and the insectanness occurs.; int6 -> int7: the departmentalness occurs.; sent1 -> int8: the Ukrainian happens.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the departmentalness and the Ukrainianness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: both the Ukrainianness and the feverishness occurs. sent2: the stubbing lacertid occurs. sent3: that the stubbing lacertid and the orthopedicsness happens leads to that the congressionalness does not occur. sent4: the sliming esthete happens and the congressionalness happens. sent5: the non-orthopedicsness triggers that both the departmentalness and the insectanness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orthopedicsness happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the stubbing lacertid and the orthopedicsness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the congressionalness does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the congressionalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the orthopedicsness does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: both the departmentalness and the insectanness occurs.; int6 -> int7: the departmentalness occurs.; sent1 -> int8: the Ukrainian happens.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__