the modification does not urticate glop and is a momentum.
sent1: the modification does not urticate glop if that it is not non-Hollywood is false. sent2: that the modification is not a kind of a Hollywood is not wrong if the chiffon is unregretful and it is a brief. sent3: the basidiospore does warm. sent4: the chiffon is not a stint. sent5: the basidiospore does jar tile and stints. sent6: the modification is not unregretful if it does not urticate glop. sent7: if the basidiospore is not a kind of a Hollywood then it is unregretful thing that does not urticate glop. sent8: the chiffon is unregretful if the basidiospore is unregretful. sent9: something that is not a brief tires NICU and does not stint. sent10: there exists nothing such that it does tire NICU and is not a kind of a stint. sent11: something does not urticate glop and is a momentum if it is non-Hollywood. sent12: the basidiospore is warming and it is unregretful. sent13: the basidiospore is a Hollywood and warming. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Hollywood then that it does not urticate glop is not incorrect. sent15: if something is not brotherly it is not informal. sent16: if the basidiospore is not a brief the fact that it is both a momentum and not regretful is not true. sent17: the modification does not stint if it is not a Hollywood. sent18: the isogamy is a kind of a momentum.
sent9 -> int1: the chiffon does tire NICU and is not a stint if it is not a brief.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chiffon is not a brief.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the chiffon does tire NICU and does not stint.; sent10 -> int3: the fact that the chiffon tires NICU but it is not a kind of a stint does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the chiffon is a kind of a brief is not false.; sent12 -> int6: the basidiospore is unregretful.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the chiffon is unregretful.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the chiffon is a kind of unregretful thing that briefs.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the modification is non-Hollywood.; sent11 -> int10: if that the modification is not Hollywood is not wrong then it does not urticate glop and it is a kind of a momentum.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the modification does not urticate glop but it is a momentum does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the modification does not urticate glop and is a momentum. ; $context$ = sent1: the modification does not urticate glop if that it is not non-Hollywood is false. sent2: that the modification is not a kind of a Hollywood is not wrong if the chiffon is unregretful and it is a brief. sent3: the basidiospore does warm. sent4: the chiffon is not a stint. sent5: the basidiospore does jar tile and stints. sent6: the modification is not unregretful if it does not urticate glop. sent7: if the basidiospore is not a kind of a Hollywood then it is unregretful thing that does not urticate glop. sent8: the chiffon is unregretful if the basidiospore is unregretful. sent9: something that is not a brief tires NICU and does not stint. sent10: there exists nothing such that it does tire NICU and is not a kind of a stint. sent11: something does not urticate glop and is a momentum if it is non-Hollywood. sent12: the basidiospore is warming and it is unregretful. sent13: the basidiospore is a Hollywood and warming. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Hollywood then that it does not urticate glop is not incorrect. sent15: if something is not brotherly it is not informal. sent16: if the basidiospore is not a brief the fact that it is both a momentum and not regretful is not true. sent17: the modification does not stint if it is not a Hollywood. sent18: the isogamy is a kind of a momentum. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the chiffon does tire NICU and is not a stint if it is not a brief.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chiffon is not a brief.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the chiffon does tire NICU and does not stint.; sent10 -> int3: the fact that the chiffon tires NICU but it is not a kind of a stint does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the chiffon is a kind of a brief is not false.; sent12 -> int6: the basidiospore is unregretful.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the chiffon is unregretful.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the chiffon is a kind of unregretful thing that briefs.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the modification is non-Hollywood.; sent11 -> int10: if that the modification is not Hollywood is not wrong then it does not urticate glop and it is a kind of a momentum.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__