the immiscibleness but not the sequestration happens.
sent1: the barring subsystem happens. sent2: if the deglazing nobelium does not occur and the hedge does not occur then the reorientation happens. sent3: that the bedewing high-five occurs results in that the sequestration does not occur. sent4: the immunosuppressiveness does not occur and the event does not occur. sent5: the presage occurs. sent6: the barring ordainer happens. sent7: the fact that the barring ordainer happens but the predation does not occur does not hold if the healthcare happens. sent8: that the teasing does not occur and the dioeciousness does not occur results in the boosting. sent9: if the barring aloha does not occur and the healthcare does not occur the bedewing high-five happens. sent10: that the dekko does not occur and the tetralogy does not occur brings about the line. sent11: the predation does not occur. sent12: the barring subsystem happens and the barring aloha does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the healthcare occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the barring ordainer but not the predation happens is incorrect.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the barring ordainer happens but the predation does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the healthcare does not occur.; sent12 -> int5: the barring aloha does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the barring aloha does not occur and the healthcare does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the bedewing high-five occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the sequestration does not occur.;
the fact that the immiscibleness happens but the sequestration does not occur is wrong.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the immiscibleness but not the sequestration happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the barring subsystem happens. sent2: if the deglazing nobelium does not occur and the hedge does not occur then the reorientation happens. sent3: that the bedewing high-five occurs results in that the sequestration does not occur. sent4: the immunosuppressiveness does not occur and the event does not occur. sent5: the presage occurs. sent6: the barring ordainer happens. sent7: the fact that the barring ordainer happens but the predation does not occur does not hold if the healthcare happens. sent8: that the teasing does not occur and the dioeciousness does not occur results in the boosting. sent9: if the barring aloha does not occur and the healthcare does not occur the bedewing high-five happens. sent10: that the dekko does not occur and the tetralogy does not occur brings about the line. sent11: the predation does not occur. sent12: the barring subsystem happens and the barring aloha does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the healthcare occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the barring ordainer but not the predation happens is incorrect.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the barring ordainer happens but the predation does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the healthcare does not occur.; sent12 -> int5: the barring aloha does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the barring aloha does not occur and the healthcare does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the bedewing high-five occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the sequestration does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__