the fact that the respite does not occur is not false.
sent1: the Frenchifying closer does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the mousetrap happens and the gleaming does not occur is not right the mousetrap does not occur. sent3: if the hearing polytechnic does not occur that the aponeuroticness occurs and the Linnaeanness does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the hearing polytechnic occurs then the sympatricness does not occur and the magnification does not occur. sent5: if the Linnaeanness happens then either the hearing polytechnic happens or the phacoemulsification does not occur or both. sent6: the gleam does not occur. sent7: the respite occurs if that the hearing polytechnic occurs or the phacoemulsification does not occur or both is not incorrect. sent8: the gleam occurs and the mousetrap happens if the half-light does not occur. sent9: the Linnaeanness does not occur if the aponeuroticness occurs but the respite does not occur. sent10: the pinning does not occur and/or the acceding does not occur if the draw happens. sent11: that the Linnaeanness does not occur triggers that either the phacoemulsification or the hearing polytechnic or both occurs. sent12: the phacoemulsification happens if the fact that the hearing commutator but not the Energy occurs is not right. sent13: both the half-light and the acceding occurs if the pinning does not occur. sent14: if the mousetrap occurs then that the Frenchifying closer does not occur and the hearing commutator happens does not hold. sent15: if the half-light happens that the mousetrap happens and the gleam does not occur is not true. sent16: that the charlatanism does not occur results in that the conception does not occur. sent17: the respite does not occur if that both the aponeuroticness and the non-Linnaeanness occurs does not hold. sent18: the phacoemulsification does not occur if the sympatricness does not occur and the magnification does not occur. sent19: either that the pinning does not occur or that the acceding does not occur or both prevents the half-light. sent20: if the Frenchifying closer does not occur then that the hearing commutator but not the Energy happens is false. sent21: the aponeuroticness but not the respite occurs if the Energy happens. sent22: the fact that the hearing commutator and the Energy occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hearing polytechnic happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the sympatricness does not occur and the magnification does not occur.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the phacoemulsification does not occur.; sent20 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the hearing commutator but not the Energy happens is false.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the phacoemulsification occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the hearing polytechnic does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: that both the aponeuroticness and the non-Linnaeanness occurs is not true.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the respite occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the respite does not occur is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the Frenchifying closer does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the mousetrap happens and the gleaming does not occur is not right the mousetrap does not occur. sent3: if the hearing polytechnic does not occur that the aponeuroticness occurs and the Linnaeanness does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the hearing polytechnic occurs then the sympatricness does not occur and the magnification does not occur. sent5: if the Linnaeanness happens then either the hearing polytechnic happens or the phacoemulsification does not occur or both. sent6: the gleam does not occur. sent7: the respite occurs if that the hearing polytechnic occurs or the phacoemulsification does not occur or both is not incorrect. sent8: the gleam occurs and the mousetrap happens if the half-light does not occur. sent9: the Linnaeanness does not occur if the aponeuroticness occurs but the respite does not occur. sent10: the pinning does not occur and/or the acceding does not occur if the draw happens. sent11: that the Linnaeanness does not occur triggers that either the phacoemulsification or the hearing polytechnic or both occurs. sent12: the phacoemulsification happens if the fact that the hearing commutator but not the Energy occurs is not right. sent13: both the half-light and the acceding occurs if the pinning does not occur. sent14: if the mousetrap occurs then that the Frenchifying closer does not occur and the hearing commutator happens does not hold. sent15: if the half-light happens that the mousetrap happens and the gleam does not occur is not true. sent16: that the charlatanism does not occur results in that the conception does not occur. sent17: the respite does not occur if that both the aponeuroticness and the non-Linnaeanness occurs does not hold. sent18: the phacoemulsification does not occur if the sympatricness does not occur and the magnification does not occur. sent19: either that the pinning does not occur or that the acceding does not occur or both prevents the half-light. sent20: if the Frenchifying closer does not occur then that the hearing commutator but not the Energy happens is false. sent21: the aponeuroticness but not the respite occurs if the Energy happens. sent22: the fact that the hearing commutator and the Energy occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hearing polytechnic happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the sympatricness does not occur and the magnification does not occur.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the phacoemulsification does not occur.; sent20 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the hearing commutator but not the Energy happens is false.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the phacoemulsification occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the hearing polytechnic does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: that both the aponeuroticness and the non-Linnaeanness occurs is not true.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__