the fact that the geoduck is not Dickensian and/or is bibliomaniacal is not right.
sent1: if the defamer is non-bibliomaniacal then the spectrogram is non-bibliomaniacal. sent2: if something does not bald then that either it is not Dickensian or it is bibliomaniacal or both does not hold. sent3: either the geoduck is Dickensian or it is bibliomaniacal or both. sent4: the geoduck is Dickensian or is bibliomaniacal or both if there is something such that it is a down. sent5: if the fact that something is combinative is not false then it is a kind of a down. sent6: that something does not service permanganate and is a kind of a down is not correct if it does not bald. sent7: if the fact that the bonefish is not a kind of a packsaddle and refaces cleaner is not right the fact that it does not service sociolinguist hold. sent8: the fact that the bonefish is not a packsaddle and refaces cleaner is not correct. sent9: the fact that something does bald and it is a kind of a down does not hold if it is not Dickensian. sent10: the geoduck does not bald and/or it is Dickensian if something refaces cleaner. sent11: the fact that the geoduck is not Dickensian and it is not combinative does not hold if there is something such that it is Dickensian. sent12: if that the geoduck is not Dickensian and it is not combinative is not true then the bonefish is not combinative. sent13: that something is combinative thing that balds does not hold if it does not service sociolinguist. sent14: if there is something such that it does not fracture photometrist then that the defamer is not a hibiscus and fracture photometrist is wrong. sent15: the fact that something does not service sociolinguist and is combinative is not right if it is a down. sent16: the whetstone is Dickensian if the spectrogram is bibliomaniacal. sent17: if the bonefish does not reface cleaner it does not service sociolinguist. sent18: if the fact that something is not a hibiscus and fractures photometrist is wrong then the fact that it is not bibliomaniacal is right. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a down then the fact that the geoduck either is not Dickensian or is bibliomaniacal or both is not incorrect. sent20: that something is a kind of non-combinative thing that balds is not right if that it does not service sociolinguist is not incorrect. sent21: there is something such that it does not fracture photometrist. sent22: the trifler is not a packsaddle. sent23: if that something is a kind of noncombinative thing that does bald is not true then it is a down.
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the bonefish does not service sociolinguist.; sent20 -> int2: that the bonefish is not combinative and does bald does not hold if it does not service sociolinguist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the bonefish is not combinative but it does bald is false.; sent23 -> int4: if the fact that the bonefish is not combinative but it does bald is wrong it downs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bonefish downs.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does down.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cleaner does not service permanganate but it is a down does not hold.
sent6 -> int7: that the cleaner does not service permanganate but it is down does not hold if it does not bald.; sent18 -> int8: the defamer is not bibliomaniacal if that it is not a hibiscus and fractures photometrist does not hold.; sent21 & sent14 -> int9: the fact that the defamer is not a kind of a hibiscus but it does fracture photometrist is incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the defamer is non-bibliomaniacal.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the spectrogram is bibliomaniacal.; sent16 & int11 -> int12: the whetstone is Dickensian.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is Dickensian.; int13 & sent11 -> int14: that the geoduck is not Dickensian and it is not combinative does not hold.; sent12 & int14 -> int15: the bonefish is not combinative.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the geoduck is not Dickensian and/or is bibliomaniacal is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the defamer is non-bibliomaniacal then the spectrogram is non-bibliomaniacal. sent2: if something does not bald then that either it is not Dickensian or it is bibliomaniacal or both does not hold. sent3: either the geoduck is Dickensian or it is bibliomaniacal or both. sent4: the geoduck is Dickensian or is bibliomaniacal or both if there is something such that it is a down. sent5: if the fact that something is combinative is not false then it is a kind of a down. sent6: that something does not service permanganate and is a kind of a down is not correct if it does not bald. sent7: if the fact that the bonefish is not a kind of a packsaddle and refaces cleaner is not right the fact that it does not service sociolinguist hold. sent8: the fact that the bonefish is not a packsaddle and refaces cleaner is not correct. sent9: the fact that something does bald and it is a kind of a down does not hold if it is not Dickensian. sent10: the geoduck does not bald and/or it is Dickensian if something refaces cleaner. sent11: the fact that the geoduck is not Dickensian and it is not combinative does not hold if there is something such that it is Dickensian. sent12: if that the geoduck is not Dickensian and it is not combinative is not true then the bonefish is not combinative. sent13: that something is combinative thing that balds does not hold if it does not service sociolinguist. sent14: if there is something such that it does not fracture photometrist then that the defamer is not a hibiscus and fracture photometrist is wrong. sent15: the fact that something does not service sociolinguist and is combinative is not right if it is a down. sent16: the whetstone is Dickensian if the spectrogram is bibliomaniacal. sent17: if the bonefish does not reface cleaner it does not service sociolinguist. sent18: if the fact that something is not a hibiscus and fractures photometrist is wrong then the fact that it is not bibliomaniacal is right. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a down then the fact that the geoduck either is not Dickensian or is bibliomaniacal or both is not incorrect. sent20: that something is a kind of non-combinative thing that balds is not right if that it does not service sociolinguist is not incorrect. sent21: there is something such that it does not fracture photometrist. sent22: the trifler is not a packsaddle. sent23: if that something is a kind of noncombinative thing that does bald is not true then it is a down. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the bonefish does not service sociolinguist.; sent20 -> int2: that the bonefish is not combinative and does bald does not hold if it does not service sociolinguist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the bonefish is not combinative but it does bald is false.; sent23 -> int4: if the fact that the bonefish is not combinative but it does bald is wrong it downs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bonefish downs.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does down.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__