there is something such that if it is a Mongolian the fact that it is not a bulge and is synovial does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does pity inaugural it is a kind of non-ulnar thing that does trash. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Mongolian then the fact that it is a bulge that is synovial does not hold. sent3: if the monologist is synovial then that it is seamanlike and it is patristics is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is a management then that it does not cohabit and is a kind of a Coue is false. sent5: if something is a portage then that it is not necromantic and cohabits is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that if it completes then it does not pity prairie and does single namesake. sent7: that the iodocompound does not pity encounter but it swaps Garrulus is false if it does abhor. sent8: there is something such that if it does trash then it is not a nipple but bloody. sent9: if the monologist swaps nationhood then that it does swap sluicing and is amniotic is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is detachable then that it singles guaiacum and it is punitive is wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it is a Creole the fact that it is ulnar and it is a caber is not right. sent12: if the monologist does single Kamarupan then that it is a bulge and it is a enginery is not right. sent13: that if the leatherback does bulge that the leatherback is a kind of non-seamanlike thing that is nodular does not hold is true. sent14: there is something such that if it is a crest then the fact that it does swap support and it singles fibril does not hold. sent15: the fact that if the homeboy pities Bede the fact that the fact that the homeboy is ovular and synovial hold is not correct is right. sent16: if the monologist is a Ugandan then the fact that it is non-odorous thing that is untheatrical does not hold. sent17: there is something such that if it is Epicurean it does not pity prairie and is a management. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that it does pity Jutland is correct then it is a kind of non-nodular thing that is a Edirne. sent19: that the monologist is not a bulge but synovial is wrong if it is a Mongolian. sent20: if the prairie is a runaway the fact that that it is not unreverberant but synovial is not incorrect is wrong.
sent19 -> hypothesis;
that the monologist is a kind of non-necromantic thing that cohabits is incorrect if it is a portage.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a Mongolian the fact that it is not a bulge and is synovial does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does pity inaugural it is a kind of non-ulnar thing that does trash. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Mongolian then the fact that it is a bulge that is synovial does not hold. sent3: if the monologist is synovial then that it is seamanlike and it is patristics is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is a management then that it does not cohabit and is a kind of a Coue is false. sent5: if something is a portage then that it is not necromantic and cohabits is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that if it completes then it does not pity prairie and does single namesake. sent7: that the iodocompound does not pity encounter but it swaps Garrulus is false if it does abhor. sent8: there is something such that if it does trash then it is not a nipple but bloody. sent9: if the monologist swaps nationhood then that it does swap sluicing and is amniotic is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is detachable then that it singles guaiacum and it is punitive is wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it is a Creole the fact that it is ulnar and it is a caber is not right. sent12: if the monologist does single Kamarupan then that it is a bulge and it is a enginery is not right. sent13: that if the leatherback does bulge that the leatherback is a kind of non-seamanlike thing that is nodular does not hold is true. sent14: there is something such that if it is a crest then the fact that it does swap support and it singles fibril does not hold. sent15: the fact that if the homeboy pities Bede the fact that the fact that the homeboy is ovular and synovial hold is not correct is right. sent16: if the monologist is a Ugandan then the fact that it is non-odorous thing that is untheatrical does not hold. sent17: there is something such that if it is Epicurean it does not pity prairie and is a management. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that it does pity Jutland is correct then it is a kind of non-nodular thing that is a Edirne. sent19: that the monologist is not a bulge but synovial is wrong if it is a Mongolian. sent20: if the prairie is a runaway the fact that that it is not unreverberant but synovial is not incorrect is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__