something does conduct and it jiggles faceted.
sent1: something is a gesso and it is cortico-hypothalamic. sent2: if the assessor is cortico-hypothalamic then the Aleut does meld but it is not cortico-hypothalamic. sent3: if that the Carter is a kind of a teetotaler that is a gesso does not hold the assessor is not preanal. sent4: the Carter does conduct. sent5: the nibbler does jiggle faceted. sent6: if that the Carter does conduct and it is a teetotaler does not hold the fact that the nibbler is not a Venetian is not incorrect. sent7: if the Aleut does meld but it does not jiggle faceted the assessor is preanal. sent8: The faceted does jiggle nibbler. sent9: that the Carter is preanal is correct. sent10: if the assessor is not preanal it jiggles newel. sent11: there exists something such that it conducts. sent12: the assessor does conduct. sent13: the fact that the Carter is a kind of a teetotaler and it is a gesso is not true. sent14: something does conduct if it is Venetian. sent15: the Aleut does meld. sent16: there are preanal things. sent17: if the Carter is not a teetotaler the assessor is not preanal. sent18: if the Aleut does meld but it is not cortico-hypothalamic then the nibbler is Venetian. sent19: there exists something such that it is a cretinism. sent20: the assessor is a kind of cortico-hypothalamic thing that does jiggle newel if it is not preanal.
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: the assessor is not preanal.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the assessor is cortico-hypothalamic and does jiggle newel.; int2 -> int3: the assessor is cortico-hypothalamic.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Aleut melds and is not cortico-hypothalamic.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the nibbler is a Venetian.; sent14 -> int6: the nibbler does conduct if it is not non-Venetian.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the nibbler conducts.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the nibbler does conduct and it does jiggle faceted.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = something does conduct and it jiggles faceted. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a gesso and it is cortico-hypothalamic. sent2: if the assessor is cortico-hypothalamic then the Aleut does meld but it is not cortico-hypothalamic. sent3: if that the Carter is a kind of a teetotaler that is a gesso does not hold the assessor is not preanal. sent4: the Carter does conduct. sent5: the nibbler does jiggle faceted. sent6: if that the Carter does conduct and it is a teetotaler does not hold the fact that the nibbler is not a Venetian is not incorrect. sent7: if the Aleut does meld but it does not jiggle faceted the assessor is preanal. sent8: The faceted does jiggle nibbler. sent9: that the Carter is preanal is correct. sent10: if the assessor is not preanal it jiggles newel. sent11: there exists something such that it conducts. sent12: the assessor does conduct. sent13: the fact that the Carter is a kind of a teetotaler and it is a gesso is not true. sent14: something does conduct if it is Venetian. sent15: the Aleut does meld. sent16: there are preanal things. sent17: if the Carter is not a teetotaler the assessor is not preanal. sent18: if the Aleut does meld but it is not cortico-hypothalamic then the nibbler is Venetian. sent19: there exists something such that it is a cretinism. sent20: the assessor is a kind of cortico-hypothalamic thing that does jiggle newel if it is not preanal. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: the assessor is not preanal.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the assessor is cortico-hypothalamic and does jiggle newel.; int2 -> int3: the assessor is cortico-hypothalamic.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Aleut melds and is not cortico-hypothalamic.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the nibbler is a Venetian.; sent14 -> int6: the nibbler does conduct if it is not non-Venetian.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the nibbler conducts.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the nibbler does conduct and it does jiggle faceted.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__