there exists something such that if it does not wrest Panonychus then that that it mystifies Toynbee and does not jazz addicted is not incorrect is wrong.
sent1: if the phenylephrine is not a gitano the fact that it is a scale that is a difficulty is not correct. sent2: that there is something such that if it does wrest Panonychus the fact that it mystifies Toynbee and does not jazz addicted is not true is not false. sent3: if the jaeger does not wrest Panonychus then the fact that it mystifies Toynbee and does not jazz addicted is not true. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not wrest Panonychus it does mystify Toynbee and it does not jazz addicted. sent5: the fact that something wrests surtout but it does not wrest Panonychus does not hold if it does not marbleize. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not translate it is a xanthine and it is not a weeds. sent7: if the heading does not jazz addicted then it does jazz heading and it does not gibber. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not wrest Panonychus then that it mystifies Toynbee and it does jazz addicted does not hold. sent9: the fact that if the jaeger does not wrest Panonychus the jaeger mystifies Toynbee but it does not jazz addicted is not wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a lakefront the fact that that it is a kind of a baffle that pleads is not incorrect does not hold. sent11: the fact that something wrests timbale and is not nonhuman is not true if it is non-editorial. sent12: if the daughter-in-law does not mystify prize that it is a kind of a fascist and is not gymnosophical is incorrect. sent13: if the jaeger wrests Panonychus that it does mystify Toynbee and does not jazz addicted is wrong. sent14: if the fact that the jaeger does not wrest Panonychus is right then that it mystifies Toynbee and jazzes addicted is not right.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not editorial that it wrests timbale and it is not nonhuman is not true.
sent11 -> int1: if the surtout is non-editorial that it wrests timbale and it is not nonhuman is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not wrest Panonychus then that that it mystifies Toynbee and does not jazz addicted is not incorrect is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the phenylephrine is not a gitano the fact that it is a scale that is a difficulty is not correct. sent2: that there is something such that if it does wrest Panonychus the fact that it mystifies Toynbee and does not jazz addicted is not true is not false. sent3: if the jaeger does not wrest Panonychus then the fact that it mystifies Toynbee and does not jazz addicted is not true. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not wrest Panonychus it does mystify Toynbee and it does not jazz addicted. sent5: the fact that something wrests surtout but it does not wrest Panonychus does not hold if it does not marbleize. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not translate it is a xanthine and it is not a weeds. sent7: if the heading does not jazz addicted then it does jazz heading and it does not gibber. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not wrest Panonychus then that it mystifies Toynbee and it does jazz addicted does not hold. sent9: the fact that if the jaeger does not wrest Panonychus the jaeger mystifies Toynbee but it does not jazz addicted is not wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a lakefront the fact that that it is a kind of a baffle that pleads is not incorrect does not hold. sent11: the fact that something wrests timbale and is not nonhuman is not true if it is non-editorial. sent12: if the daughter-in-law does not mystify prize that it is a kind of a fascist and is not gymnosophical is incorrect. sent13: if the jaeger wrests Panonychus that it does mystify Toynbee and does not jazz addicted is wrong. sent14: if the fact that the jaeger does not wrest Panonychus is right then that it mystifies Toynbee and jazzes addicted is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__