the Papua is not a reeler.
sent1: if something is migrational it is febrile. sent2: the baklava disguises Heyse. sent3: that something is a Hygeia and it is contractual is not true if it does not julienne Strickland. sent4: that the forefather is not Sisyphean and does not idealize is not correct if it is not contractual. sent5: the accordion is tonal if the baklava does disguise Heyse. sent6: the Papua is not a reeler if there exists something such that that it is not Sisyphean and does not idealize is incorrect. sent7: the calabash does not julienne Strickland if there exists something such that it is febrile. sent8: the forefather is not contractual. sent9: the patriarch is not contractual if there exists something such that that it is a Hygeia and it is contractual is false. sent10: that the Papua is a reeler and is an incision is false if that the patriarch is not contractual hold. sent11: if something is a Hygeia then it is not an incision and it does julienne Strickland. sent12: if the accordion is not non-tonal it is migrational and it is not hormonal. sent13: the fact that the forefather is non-Sisyphean thing that idealizes is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that that the fact that it is not contractual but Sisyphean hold is incorrect. sent15: the Papua does not idealize. sent16: something is a reeler and it is contractual if it is not an incision. sent17: that the forefather is not a reeler hold if there is something such that that it is a kind of a reeler that is an incision is false. sent18: the fact that the Papua is not contractual and does idealize does not hold if it is not a reeler.
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: that the forefather is not Sisyphean and does not idealize does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not Sisyphean and it does not idealize is wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the forefather is not a kind of a reeler.
sent3 -> int3: the fact that the calabash is a Hygeia and is contractual is not correct if it does not julienne Strickland.; sent1 -> int4: if the accordion is migrational it is febrile.; sent5 & sent2 -> int5: the accordion is tonal.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the accordion is migrational but it is not hormonal.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the accordion is migrational hold.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the accordion is febrile.; int8 -> int9: something is febrile.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the calabash does not julienne Strickland.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the calabash is a Hygeia that is contractual is wrong.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is a Hygeia and contractual is not right.; int12 & sent9 -> int13: the patriarch is not contractual.; sent10 & int13 -> int14: that the Papua is a reeler and it is a kind of an incision does not hold.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a reeler and it is an incision is false.; int15 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Papua is not a reeler. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is migrational it is febrile. sent2: the baklava disguises Heyse. sent3: that something is a Hygeia and it is contractual is not true if it does not julienne Strickland. sent4: that the forefather is not Sisyphean and does not idealize is not correct if it is not contractual. sent5: the accordion is tonal if the baklava does disguise Heyse. sent6: the Papua is not a reeler if there exists something such that that it is not Sisyphean and does not idealize is incorrect. sent7: the calabash does not julienne Strickland if there exists something such that it is febrile. sent8: the forefather is not contractual. sent9: the patriarch is not contractual if there exists something such that that it is a Hygeia and it is contractual is false. sent10: that the Papua is a reeler and is an incision is false if that the patriarch is not contractual hold. sent11: if something is a Hygeia then it is not an incision and it does julienne Strickland. sent12: if the accordion is not non-tonal it is migrational and it is not hormonal. sent13: the fact that the forefather is non-Sisyphean thing that idealizes is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that that the fact that it is not contractual but Sisyphean hold is incorrect. sent15: the Papua does not idealize. sent16: something is a reeler and it is contractual if it is not an incision. sent17: that the forefather is not a reeler hold if there is something such that that it is a kind of a reeler that is an incision is false. sent18: the fact that the Papua is not contractual and does idealize does not hold if it is not a reeler. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: that the forefather is not Sisyphean and does not idealize does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not Sisyphean and it does not idealize is wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__