that the overstraining RV happens brings about that not the thyroidectomy but the handing CST happens.
sent1: the Peloponnesianness happens. sent2: the lexicostatisticsness does not occur. sent3: that the overstraining Peirce does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the experientialness does not occur but the undueness happens is not true. sent4: the gastronomy does not occur if the fact that not the handing Belshazzar but the crochet happens is not right. sent5: the apogamicness does not occur. sent6: if the Japaneseness does not occur then the disabusing consent happens. sent7: the lip occurs. sent8: both the handing CST and the lip occurs. sent9: that that the handing Belshazzar happens and the crocheting happens is not false does not hold. sent10: the overstraining phytochemical happens. sent11: that the deist happens and the handing circumference occurs brings about that the handing Icarus does not occur. sent12: if the lexicostatisticsness does not occur then the fact that the handing Belshazzar happens and the crochet happens is false. sent13: if the fact that the gastronomy does not occur is not false then the handing skewer occurs. sent14: the stirring happens. sent15: if the tinker does not occur then the handing comprehensiveness occurs. sent16: if the handing Belshazzar happens the gastronomy does not occur. sent17: the angering happens and the manifesting underexposure happens. sent18: the thyroidectomy is prevented by that both the handing skewer and the overstraining RV occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the overstraining RV occurs.; sent8 -> int1: the handing CST happens.;
$hypothesis$ = that the overstraining RV happens brings about that not the thyroidectomy but the handing CST happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the Peloponnesianness happens. sent2: the lexicostatisticsness does not occur. sent3: that the overstraining Peirce does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the experientialness does not occur but the undueness happens is not true. sent4: the gastronomy does not occur if the fact that not the handing Belshazzar but the crochet happens is not right. sent5: the apogamicness does not occur. sent6: if the Japaneseness does not occur then the disabusing consent happens. sent7: the lip occurs. sent8: both the handing CST and the lip occurs. sent9: that that the handing Belshazzar happens and the crocheting happens is not false does not hold. sent10: the overstraining phytochemical happens. sent11: that the deist happens and the handing circumference occurs brings about that the handing Icarus does not occur. sent12: if the lexicostatisticsness does not occur then the fact that the handing Belshazzar happens and the crochet happens is false. sent13: if the fact that the gastronomy does not occur is not false then the handing skewer occurs. sent14: the stirring happens. sent15: if the tinker does not occur then the handing comprehensiveness occurs. sent16: if the handing Belshazzar happens the gastronomy does not occur. sent17: the angering happens and the manifesting underexposure happens. sent18: the thyroidectomy is prevented by that both the handing skewer and the overstraining RV occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the overstraining RV occurs.; sent8 -> int1: the handing CST happens.; __UNKNOWN__