that the stylet is an aspirate and does not derail microprocessor is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the jaconet is not postnatal is not false if the stylet is not an aspirate and it does not derail microprocessor. sent2: that the needleworker is not a kind of a skidder is correct. sent3: if the needleworker derails microprocessor that the stylet is conditional but it is not postnatal is wrong. sent4: the needleworker is a Channidae if it is postnatal and aspirates. sent5: that if something is a skidder but it is not a Channidae then it is conditional is not incorrect. sent6: if the boysenberry perplexes stealth and is not a kind of a skidder it does perplex Sexton. sent7: the stylet is an aspirate that is conditional. sent8: if the cinema is not a chutzpanik and is a waste the stylet is not a chutzpanik. sent9: something does not aspirate if that either it derails microprocessor or it is not postnatal or both is not right. sent10: if something is a kind of a Channidae but it is not a skidder then it is postnatal. sent11: the needleworker is not a kind of a skidder if it is not conditional. sent12: if something is not a chutzpanik it is conditional and is a parang. sent13: if the needleworker is a kind of a Channidae and it is a skidder then it is postnatal. sent14: the cinema is postnatal if the fact that it is not a chutzpanik and it is not postnatal is not correct. sent15: if the needleworker is not conditional then it is a Channidae but not a skidder. sent16: something is postnatal if it is a Channidae and it is a skidder. sent17: if the stylet is a skidder then that the needleworker is a Channidae and does not derail microprocessor is false. sent18: if the needleworker is postnatal then that the stylet is an aspirate but it does not derail microprocessor is not correct. sent19: if the fact that the stylet is not unconditional is true then the fact that the hell derails microprocessor and/or it is not postnatal is false. sent20: something is not a chutzpanik but it does waste if it is not a Rhamnus. sent21: the needleworker is not conditional.
sent10 -> int1: if the needleworker is a Channidae and is not a kind of a skidder then the fact that it is postnatal is correct.; sent15 & sent21 -> int2: the needleworker is a Channidae and is not a kind of a skidder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the needleworker is postnatal.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the hell is not an aspirate is not incorrect.
sent9 -> int4: the hell is not a kind of an aspirate if the fact that it derails microprocessor and/or it is not postnatal is incorrect.; sent12 -> int5: the stylet is conditional and it is a parang if it is not a chutzpanik.; sent20 -> int6: if the cinema is not a Rhamnus then it is both not a chutzpanik and a waste.;
$hypothesis$ = that the stylet is an aspirate and does not derail microprocessor is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the jaconet is not postnatal is not false if the stylet is not an aspirate and it does not derail microprocessor. sent2: that the needleworker is not a kind of a skidder is correct. sent3: if the needleworker derails microprocessor that the stylet is conditional but it is not postnatal is wrong. sent4: the needleworker is a Channidae if it is postnatal and aspirates. sent5: that if something is a skidder but it is not a Channidae then it is conditional is not incorrect. sent6: if the boysenberry perplexes stealth and is not a kind of a skidder it does perplex Sexton. sent7: the stylet is an aspirate that is conditional. sent8: if the cinema is not a chutzpanik and is a waste the stylet is not a chutzpanik. sent9: something does not aspirate if that either it derails microprocessor or it is not postnatal or both is not right. sent10: if something is a kind of a Channidae but it is not a skidder then it is postnatal. sent11: the needleworker is not a kind of a skidder if it is not conditional. sent12: if something is not a chutzpanik it is conditional and is a parang. sent13: if the needleworker is a kind of a Channidae and it is a skidder then it is postnatal. sent14: the cinema is postnatal if the fact that it is not a chutzpanik and it is not postnatal is not correct. sent15: if the needleworker is not conditional then it is a Channidae but not a skidder. sent16: something is postnatal if it is a Channidae and it is a skidder. sent17: if the stylet is a skidder then that the needleworker is a Channidae and does not derail microprocessor is false. sent18: if the needleworker is postnatal then that the stylet is an aspirate but it does not derail microprocessor is not correct. sent19: if the fact that the stylet is not unconditional is true then the fact that the hell derails microprocessor and/or it is not postnatal is false. sent20: something is not a chutzpanik but it does waste if it is not a Rhamnus. sent21: the needleworker is not conditional. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the needleworker is a Channidae and is not a kind of a skidder then the fact that it is postnatal is correct.; sent15 & sent21 -> int2: the needleworker is a Channidae and is not a kind of a skidder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the needleworker is postnatal.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__