the hydroelectricity is unsworn.
sent1: if that the co-star confederates millipede and/or it is unobtrusive is not correct then the briarwood is not a kind of a bowls. sent2: if something is unsworn and it is hemodynamics then it does not cascade factorial. sent3: if that something bowls and does deactivate metallurgist is not true then it is not a kind of a armamentarium. sent4: the bridecake does not confederate bush if the scout is not a kind of a armamentarium. sent5: the fact that the bridecake is not antimagnetic is correct. sent6: if that something is both hemodynamics and a Branchiostegidae is wrong then it is not unsworn. sent7: if the bridecake does not confederate bush then the fact that the hydroelectricity is hemodynamics and it is a Branchiostegidae is not true. sent8: something is not a Branchiostegidae if it does not cascade factorial and it does drain. sent9: if the bridecake is hemodynamics the hydroelectricity is hemodynamics. sent10: the bridecake is hemodynamics. sent11: something is a kind of a Branchiostegidae if the fact that it is hemodynamics is not incorrect. sent12: the bridecake does cascade factorial. sent13: if the hydroelectricity is not unsworn then it does not cascade factorial and drains. sent14: if the bridecake is not paleontological it is not unsworn. sent15: if the fact that the hydroelectricity is not unsworn is not incorrect it does not cascade factorial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hydroelectricity is not unsworn.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the hydroelectricity does not cascade factorial and is a kind of a drained.; sent8 -> int2: if the hydroelectricity does not cascade factorial but it does drain then it is not a Branchiostegidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hydroelectricity is not a Branchiostegidae.; sent11 -> int4: if that the hydroelectricity is not non-hemodynamics hold the fact that it is a Branchiostegidae hold.; sent9 & sent10 -> int5: the hydroelectricity is hemodynamics.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the hydroelectricity is a Branchiostegidae.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the hydroelectricity is not unsworn.
sent6 -> int8: if that the hydroelectricity is hemodynamics and is a Branchiostegidae is incorrect then it is sworn.; sent3 -> int9: if the fact that the scout is a bowls that deactivates metallurgist is wrong it is not a kind of a armamentarium.;
$hypothesis$ = the hydroelectricity is unsworn. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the co-star confederates millipede and/or it is unobtrusive is not correct then the briarwood is not a kind of a bowls. sent2: if something is unsworn and it is hemodynamics then it does not cascade factorial. sent3: if that something bowls and does deactivate metallurgist is not true then it is not a kind of a armamentarium. sent4: the bridecake does not confederate bush if the scout is not a kind of a armamentarium. sent5: the fact that the bridecake is not antimagnetic is correct. sent6: if that something is both hemodynamics and a Branchiostegidae is wrong then it is not unsworn. sent7: if the bridecake does not confederate bush then the fact that the hydroelectricity is hemodynamics and it is a Branchiostegidae is not true. sent8: something is not a Branchiostegidae if it does not cascade factorial and it does drain. sent9: if the bridecake is hemodynamics the hydroelectricity is hemodynamics. sent10: the bridecake is hemodynamics. sent11: something is a kind of a Branchiostegidae if the fact that it is hemodynamics is not incorrect. sent12: the bridecake does cascade factorial. sent13: if the hydroelectricity is not unsworn then it does not cascade factorial and drains. sent14: if the bridecake is not paleontological it is not unsworn. sent15: if the fact that the hydroelectricity is not unsworn is not incorrect it does not cascade factorial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hydroelectricity is not unsworn.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the hydroelectricity does not cascade factorial and is a kind of a drained.; sent8 -> int2: if the hydroelectricity does not cascade factorial but it does drain then it is not a Branchiostegidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hydroelectricity is not a Branchiostegidae.; sent11 -> int4: if that the hydroelectricity is not non-hemodynamics hold the fact that it is a Branchiostegidae hold.; sent9 & sent10 -> int5: the hydroelectricity is hemodynamics.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the hydroelectricity is a Branchiostegidae.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__