the fact that there exists something such that if it does not carry the fact that it compromises lock-gate and/or it is not a Serranus is not right is incorrect.
sent1: that something is a kind of a Dunker and/or it does not compromise smoothie is false if it is not a medley. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not carry it compromises lock-gate and/or is not a kind of a Serranus. sent3: the fact that the fact that the gamecock does compromise lock-gate and/or it is not a Serranus is not incorrect is wrong if it is not a carry. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a carry it is a Serranus. sent5: if the fact that something is not a Dunker hold then that it is healthy and/or it is not bicameral is not true. sent6: that that either the gamecock does compromise lock-gate or it is the Serranus or both is false if the gamecock is not a carry is true. sent7: that either the modeler is healthy or it does not compromise lock-gate or both is not right if it does not dab Everest. sent8: that the gamecock either does compromise lock-gate or is not a Serranus or both does not hold if it carries. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not carry that it compromises lock-gate or it is a Serranus or both is not correct. sent10: the gamecock does not compromise lock-gate if it is not a carry. sent11: there exists something such that if it carries the fact that it does compromise lock-gate and/or it is not a kind of a Serranus does not hold. sent12: if the gamecock is not a carry then it compromises lock-gate and/or it is not a Serranus. sent13: there is something such that if it does not carry the fact that it does not compromise lock-gate is not wrong.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a Dunker that it is healthy or it is not bicameral or both is not true.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the smoothie is healthy or it is not bicameral or both is not true if it is not a Dunker.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not carry the fact that it compromises lock-gate and/or it is not a Serranus is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a kind of a Dunker and/or it does not compromise smoothie is false if it is not a medley. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not carry it compromises lock-gate and/or is not a kind of a Serranus. sent3: the fact that the fact that the gamecock does compromise lock-gate and/or it is not a Serranus is not incorrect is wrong if it is not a carry. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a carry it is a Serranus. sent5: if the fact that something is not a Dunker hold then that it is healthy and/or it is not bicameral is not true. sent6: that that either the gamecock does compromise lock-gate or it is the Serranus or both is false if the gamecock is not a carry is true. sent7: that either the modeler is healthy or it does not compromise lock-gate or both is not right if it does not dab Everest. sent8: that the gamecock either does compromise lock-gate or is not a Serranus or both does not hold if it carries. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not carry that it compromises lock-gate or it is a Serranus or both is not correct. sent10: the gamecock does not compromise lock-gate if it is not a carry. sent11: there exists something such that if it carries the fact that it does compromise lock-gate and/or it is not a kind of a Serranus does not hold. sent12: if the gamecock is not a carry then it compromises lock-gate and/or it is not a Serranus. sent13: there is something such that if it does not carry the fact that it does not compromise lock-gate is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__