that if the implantation is allomerous the pock is a feline is wrong.
sent1: if the skateboard unsaddles then that the fact that either the pock does not undercut pock or it is a feline or both is not right is right. sent2: there are allomerous things. sent3: if there exists something such that it is allomerous and/or it is a unresponsiveness then the pock is a feline. sent4: if something does not grate Bishkek it is a rental and it is an intuition. sent5: if the hornist unsaddles then the skateboard unsaddles. sent6: the implantation is a unresponsiveness. sent7: that the pisiform is allomerous a unresponsiveness is correct if the implantation is not feline. sent8: the implantation is not a feline if that the pock does not undercut pock and/or it is a kind of a feline is false. sent9: either something is a feline or it is a unresponsiveness or both. sent10: the hornist does unsaddle if the neutral is an intuition. sent11: there is something such that it is a unresponsiveness. sent12: if that the bot either grates Bishkek or induces NSA or both does not hold the neutral does not grates Bishkek.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the implantation is not non-allomerous.; assump1 -> int1: the implantation is allomerous or it is a unresponsiveness or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is allomerous or is a unresponsiveness or both.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the pock is a feline.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the pisiform is a unresponsiveness.
sent4 -> int4: the neutral is a rental and is an intuition if it does not grate Bishkek.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the implantation is allomerous the pock is a feline is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the skateboard unsaddles then that the fact that either the pock does not undercut pock or it is a feline or both is not right is right. sent2: there are allomerous things. sent3: if there exists something such that it is allomerous and/or it is a unresponsiveness then the pock is a feline. sent4: if something does not grate Bishkek it is a rental and it is an intuition. sent5: if the hornist unsaddles then the skateboard unsaddles. sent6: the implantation is a unresponsiveness. sent7: that the pisiform is allomerous a unresponsiveness is correct if the implantation is not feline. sent8: the implantation is not a feline if that the pock does not undercut pock and/or it is a kind of a feline is false. sent9: either something is a feline or it is a unresponsiveness or both. sent10: the hornist does unsaddle if the neutral is an intuition. sent11: there is something such that it is a unresponsiveness. sent12: if that the bot either grates Bishkek or induces NSA or both does not hold the neutral does not grates Bishkek. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the implantation is not non-allomerous.; assump1 -> int1: the implantation is allomerous or it is a unresponsiveness or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is allomerous or is a unresponsiveness or both.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the pock is a feline.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__