either the russet is cyclothymic or it does confine Cicadidae or both.
sent1: if the pumpkin persists diva it does not confine Cicadidae. sent2: either the russet is cyclothymic or it confines Cicadidae or both if the pumpkin does not confines Cicadidae. sent3: the differential is a wakeboard or not temperamental or both. sent4: the russet is not a kind of a funny if it is both a actinomycin and not a Greeley. sent5: if the differential is nonparticulate the mugshot is a funny. sent6: everything is not a wakeboard and/or it is temperamental. sent7: if something does not lose bentwood then it is cautious. sent8: if that something is nonparticulate and does not persist diva is not correct that it is not nonparticulate is true. sent9: everything either does confine pumpkin or does not lose agitprop or both. sent10: the russet is a kind of a actinomycin if the mugshot is a kind of a actinomycin. sent11: if something is not a kind of a wakeboard and/or it is not temperamental it is nonparticulate. sent12: if something does persist diva then the fact that it does not confine Cicadidae is not wrong. sent13: everything is a kind of a wakeboard and/or is not temperamental. sent14: if that something does not persist diva but it is a actinomycin is wrong then that it does not confine Cicadidae hold. sent15: the fact that something is not non-cyclothymic and/or it does confine Cicadidae is incorrect if it is not nonparticulate. sent16: the fact that the pumpkin persists diva and is a actinomycin is not right if something is a funny. sent17: the fact that the pumpkin persists diva and it is a actinomycin is false. sent18: the pumpkin is cyclothymic and/or is a kind of an ultimate. sent19: the differential is not a kind of a wakeboard and/or it is temperamental. sent20: everything is not a kind of a wakeboard or is not temperamental or both. sent21: the fact that the pumpkin does not persist diva and is a actinomycin does not hold if something is a funny.
sent20 -> int1: the differential is not a kind of a wakeboard or it is not temperamental or both.; sent11 -> int2: if the differential either is not a wakeboard or is not temperamental or both it is nonparticulate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the differential is nonparticulate.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the mugshot is a funny.; int4 -> int5: something is a funny.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the fact that the pumpkin does not persist diva and is a actinomycin is incorrect.; sent14 -> int7: if the fact that the pumpkin does not persist diva and is a actinomycin is false then it does not confine Cicadidae.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the pumpkin does not confine Cicadidae.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the russet is cyclothymic or it confines Cicadidae or both is not correct.
sent15 -> int9: that the russet is cyclothymic or confines Cicadidae or both is not true if it is not nonparticulate.; sent8 -> int10: if that the russet is nonparticulate and does not persist diva is false then it is not nonparticulate.;
$hypothesis$ = either the russet is cyclothymic or it does confine Cicadidae or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pumpkin persists diva it does not confine Cicadidae. sent2: either the russet is cyclothymic or it confines Cicadidae or both if the pumpkin does not confines Cicadidae. sent3: the differential is a wakeboard or not temperamental or both. sent4: the russet is not a kind of a funny if it is both a actinomycin and not a Greeley. sent5: if the differential is nonparticulate the mugshot is a funny. sent6: everything is not a wakeboard and/or it is temperamental. sent7: if something does not lose bentwood then it is cautious. sent8: if that something is nonparticulate and does not persist diva is not correct that it is not nonparticulate is true. sent9: everything either does confine pumpkin or does not lose agitprop or both. sent10: the russet is a kind of a actinomycin if the mugshot is a kind of a actinomycin. sent11: if something is not a kind of a wakeboard and/or it is not temperamental it is nonparticulate. sent12: if something does persist diva then the fact that it does not confine Cicadidae is not wrong. sent13: everything is a kind of a wakeboard and/or is not temperamental. sent14: if that something does not persist diva but it is a actinomycin is wrong then that it does not confine Cicadidae hold. sent15: the fact that something is not non-cyclothymic and/or it does confine Cicadidae is incorrect if it is not nonparticulate. sent16: the fact that the pumpkin persists diva and is a actinomycin is not right if something is a funny. sent17: the fact that the pumpkin persists diva and it is a actinomycin is false. sent18: the pumpkin is cyclothymic and/or is a kind of an ultimate. sent19: the differential is not a kind of a wakeboard and/or it is temperamental. sent20: everything is not a kind of a wakeboard or is not temperamental or both. sent21: the fact that the pumpkin does not persist diva and is a actinomycin does not hold if something is a funny. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the differential is not a kind of a wakeboard or it is not temperamental or both.; sent11 -> int2: if the differential either is not a wakeboard or is not temperamental or both it is nonparticulate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the differential is nonparticulate.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the mugshot is a funny.; int4 -> int5: something is a funny.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the fact that the pumpkin does not persist diva and is a actinomycin is incorrect.; sent14 -> int7: if the fact that the pumpkin does not persist diva and is a actinomycin is false then it does not confine Cicadidae.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the pumpkin does not confine Cicadidae.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__