the Bantu does not occur.
sent1: that the Elizabethanness occurs and the ink-jetness does not occur is brought about by that the broiling hesitation does not occur. sent2: the unwelcomeness happens if the nonjudgmentalness happens but the ceilidh does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the Washingtonian does not occur hold then that not the replication but the broiling funrun happens does not hold. sent4: the uterineness does not occur. sent5: if that the nonjudgmentalness does not occur and the broiling blinking does not occur is not right then the broiling blinking occurs. sent6: the alighting occurs and the nonjudgmentalness happens. sent7: that the fabricating rave occurs causes that both the non-uterineness and the broiling honesty occurs. sent8: if the fact that the fact that both the broiling hesitation and the unwelcomeness occurs is wrong is correct then the grating does not occur. sent9: if the broiling funrun does not occur then the fabricating rave happens and the trephination occurs. sent10: the nonjudgmentalness does not occur if that the ceilidh or the alighting or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the ceilidh does not occur if that that the broiling honesty does not occur and/or the uterineness happens is wrong is not false. sent12: the Elizabethanness happens. sent13: the fact that the unwelcomeness does not occur and the broiling hesitation happens does not hold if the broiling blinking occurs. sent14: that the broiling funrun does not occur is true if the fact that not the replication but the broiling funrun occurs is wrong. sent15: the broiling hesitation and/or the broiling blinking occurs. sent16: the alighting happens. sent17: if the abasicness occurs and/or the thenalness does not occur then the cachecticness does not occur. sent18: the broiling hesitation or that the broiling blinking does not occur or both results in that the Bantuness does not occur. sent19: if the broiling blinking does not occur then that the broiling hesitation happens and the unwelcomeness occurs is incorrect. sent20: the Elizabethanness occurs if the broiling hesitation does not occur. sent21: the fact that the Washingtonian does not occur is correct if the fact that the quarantining bdellium and the Washingtonian occurs does not hold. sent22: the fact that the nonjudgmentalness does not occur and the broiling blinking does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the ceilidh occurs is true. sent23: if the broiling blinking does not occur the Bantuness does not occur. sent24: that the unwelcomeness occurs is prevented by the non-ink-jetness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broiling hesitation does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Elizabethan but not the ink-jetness happens.; int1 -> int2: the ink-jetness does not occur.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the unwelcomeness does not occur.; sent6 -> int4: the nonjudgmentalness happens.;
the Bantu occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the Bantu does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Elizabethanness occurs and the ink-jetness does not occur is brought about by that the broiling hesitation does not occur. sent2: the unwelcomeness happens if the nonjudgmentalness happens but the ceilidh does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the Washingtonian does not occur hold then that not the replication but the broiling funrun happens does not hold. sent4: the uterineness does not occur. sent5: if that the nonjudgmentalness does not occur and the broiling blinking does not occur is not right then the broiling blinking occurs. sent6: the alighting occurs and the nonjudgmentalness happens. sent7: that the fabricating rave occurs causes that both the non-uterineness and the broiling honesty occurs. sent8: if the fact that the fact that both the broiling hesitation and the unwelcomeness occurs is wrong is correct then the grating does not occur. sent9: if the broiling funrun does not occur then the fabricating rave happens and the trephination occurs. sent10: the nonjudgmentalness does not occur if that the ceilidh or the alighting or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the ceilidh does not occur if that that the broiling honesty does not occur and/or the uterineness happens is wrong is not false. sent12: the Elizabethanness happens. sent13: the fact that the unwelcomeness does not occur and the broiling hesitation happens does not hold if the broiling blinking occurs. sent14: that the broiling funrun does not occur is true if the fact that not the replication but the broiling funrun occurs is wrong. sent15: the broiling hesitation and/or the broiling blinking occurs. sent16: the alighting happens. sent17: if the abasicness occurs and/or the thenalness does not occur then the cachecticness does not occur. sent18: the broiling hesitation or that the broiling blinking does not occur or both results in that the Bantuness does not occur. sent19: if the broiling blinking does not occur then that the broiling hesitation happens and the unwelcomeness occurs is incorrect. sent20: the Elizabethanness occurs if the broiling hesitation does not occur. sent21: the fact that the Washingtonian does not occur is correct if the fact that the quarantining bdellium and the Washingtonian occurs does not hold. sent22: the fact that the nonjudgmentalness does not occur and the broiling blinking does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the ceilidh occurs is true. sent23: if the broiling blinking does not occur the Bantuness does not occur. sent24: that the unwelcomeness occurs is prevented by the non-ink-jetness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broiling hesitation does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Elizabethan but not the ink-jetness happens.; int1 -> int2: the ink-jetness does not occur.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the unwelcomeness does not occur.; sent6 -> int4: the nonjudgmentalness happens.; __UNKNOWN__