the fact that that the creaming pipet happens hold if the drollery happens is false.
sent1: the screwup does not occur. sent2: that the tapotement does not occur but the decreasing carotenoid happens is not correct. sent3: if that the fact that the tapotement does not occur and the decreasing carotenoid does not occur is incorrect is true then the fact that the circumvention does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the nonparametricness occurs and the transparency does not occur does not hold. sent5: that not the mounting but the creaming buttercup happens does not hold if the creaming proteome does not occur. sent6: the creaming pipet happens if that that the Texanness does not occur and the port does not occur hold does not hold. sent7: if the vasomotorness does not occur the fact that that the Latvian does not occur and the enfeoffing gizzard does not occur is not wrong is incorrect. sent8: the impaling does not occur. sent9: if the impermissibleness does not occur the fact that the Texan but not the porting happens is wrong. sent10: the fact that the benediction does not occur and the eleven-plus does not occur does not hold. sent11: that the tapotement does not occur and the decreasing carotenoid does not occur is wrong if the screwup does not occur. sent12: the enfeoffing schlep happens. sent13: that the Texanness happens and the port does not occur does not hold. sent14: if that the Texan occurs is not incorrect then the creaming pipet happens. sent15: if the screwup does not occur then the fact that not the tapotement but the decreasing carotenoid occurs is not true. sent16: if the drollery occurs and the circumvention happens the fact that the impermissibleness does not occur is true. sent17: if the impermissibleness does not occur then the fact that the Texanness does not occur and the porting does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drollery happens.; sent11 & sent1 -> int1: that the fact that the tapotement does not occur and the decreasing carotenoid does not occur is true is not true.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the circumvention happens.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: both the drollery and the circumvention happens.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the impermissibleness does not occur.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the Texanness does not occur and the port does not occur hold is not right.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the creaming pipet occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the creaming pipet happens hold if the drollery happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the screwup does not occur. sent2: that the tapotement does not occur but the decreasing carotenoid happens is not correct. sent3: if that the fact that the tapotement does not occur and the decreasing carotenoid does not occur is incorrect is true then the fact that the circumvention does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the nonparametricness occurs and the transparency does not occur does not hold. sent5: that not the mounting but the creaming buttercup happens does not hold if the creaming proteome does not occur. sent6: the creaming pipet happens if that that the Texanness does not occur and the port does not occur hold does not hold. sent7: if the vasomotorness does not occur the fact that that the Latvian does not occur and the enfeoffing gizzard does not occur is not wrong is incorrect. sent8: the impaling does not occur. sent9: if the impermissibleness does not occur the fact that the Texan but not the porting happens is wrong. sent10: the fact that the benediction does not occur and the eleven-plus does not occur does not hold. sent11: that the tapotement does not occur and the decreasing carotenoid does not occur is wrong if the screwup does not occur. sent12: the enfeoffing schlep happens. sent13: that the Texanness happens and the port does not occur does not hold. sent14: if that the Texan occurs is not incorrect then the creaming pipet happens. sent15: if the screwup does not occur then the fact that not the tapotement but the decreasing carotenoid occurs is not true. sent16: if the drollery occurs and the circumvention happens the fact that the impermissibleness does not occur is true. sent17: if the impermissibleness does not occur then the fact that the Texanness does not occur and the porting does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drollery happens.; sent11 & sent1 -> int1: that the fact that the tapotement does not occur and the decreasing carotenoid does not occur is true is not true.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the circumvention happens.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: both the drollery and the circumvention happens.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the impermissibleness does not occur.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the Texanness does not occur and the port does not occur hold is not right.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the creaming pipet occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__