the angiologist chines.
sent1: the snipe does not flake ransomed if that that the tequila is not important and/or it does tip asparagine is not true is right. sent2: if the Mahayanist does tip asparagine that the tequila is not important and/or it does tip asparagine is wrong. sent3: the Mahayanist does tip asparagine if the oxidase is a Charleroi. sent4: that the angiologist does chine is correct if something does not tip conger. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a do and it tips conger is wrong then the angiologist is a chine. sent6: something that is not a mealworm flakes ransomed and is a ribald. sent7: the fact that the oxidase is a ribald and it tips conger does not hold. sent8: there is something such that it is a do and it tips conger. sent9: if the fact that the snipe is important is not wrong the tequila is not important. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is a chine and it flakes ransomed is false. sent11: that the oxidase is a do and tips conger is not correct if it is not a kind of a Charleroi. sent12: something is not a posse and/or is not a kind of a mealworm. sent13: the angiologist is not a chine if the fact that the oxidase is not a chine and does tip asparagine is not false. sent14: the Mahayanist is a Charleroi and it flakes ransomed if the tequila is not important. sent15: if something is not a posse or it is not a mealworm or both the snipe is not a mealworm. sent16: if the blaster is a kind of a ribald the fact that it does not tip conger and it is not a kind of a do is not right. sent17: the Mahayanist is a do if the oxidase does tip asparagine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oxidase is a Charleroi.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Mahayanist does tip asparagine.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that either the tequila is not important or it tips asparagine or both is not right.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the snipe does not flake ransomed.; sent6 -> int4: if the snipe is not a mealworm it does flake ransomed and is a ribald.; sent12 & sent15 -> int5: the snipe is not a kind of a mealworm.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the snipe does flake ransomed and it is a ribald.; int6 -> int7: the snipe flakes ransomed.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the oxidase is not a Charleroi.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: that the oxidase is a kind of a do and it tips conger is false.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a do that tips conger is not right.; int11 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the angiologist does not chine.
$hypothesis$ = the angiologist chines. ; $context$ = sent1: the snipe does not flake ransomed if that that the tequila is not important and/or it does tip asparagine is not true is right. sent2: if the Mahayanist does tip asparagine that the tequila is not important and/or it does tip asparagine is wrong. sent3: the Mahayanist does tip asparagine if the oxidase is a Charleroi. sent4: that the angiologist does chine is correct if something does not tip conger. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a do and it tips conger is wrong then the angiologist is a chine. sent6: something that is not a mealworm flakes ransomed and is a ribald. sent7: the fact that the oxidase is a ribald and it tips conger does not hold. sent8: there is something such that it is a do and it tips conger. sent9: if the fact that the snipe is important is not wrong the tequila is not important. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is a chine and it flakes ransomed is false. sent11: that the oxidase is a do and tips conger is not correct if it is not a kind of a Charleroi. sent12: something is not a posse and/or is not a kind of a mealworm. sent13: the angiologist is not a chine if the fact that the oxidase is not a chine and does tip asparagine is not false. sent14: the Mahayanist is a Charleroi and it flakes ransomed if the tequila is not important. sent15: if something is not a posse or it is not a mealworm or both the snipe is not a mealworm. sent16: if the blaster is a kind of a ribald the fact that it does not tip conger and it is not a kind of a do is not right. sent17: the Mahayanist is a do if the oxidase does tip asparagine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oxidase is a Charleroi.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Mahayanist does tip asparagine.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that either the tequila is not important or it tips asparagine or both is not right.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the snipe does not flake ransomed.; sent6 -> int4: if the snipe is not a mealworm it does flake ransomed and is a ribald.; sent12 & sent15 -> int5: the snipe is not a kind of a mealworm.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the snipe does flake ransomed and it is a ribald.; int6 -> int7: the snipe flakes ransomed.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the oxidase is not a Charleroi.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: that the oxidase is a kind of a do and it tips conger is false.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a do that tips conger is not right.; int11 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__