the skim does not occur.
sent1: the patience happens. sent2: if the blocking Husserl does not occur then the duster happens. sent3: the fact that the blocking Husserl occurs and the ceramics happens is not correct. sent4: the nourishment but not the photometry happens if the annulment does not occur. sent5: the duster does not occur if both the patience and the annulment occurs. sent6: that that the skimming occurs is triggered by that the nourishment occurs but the photometry does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: that that the duster occurs but the nourishment does not occur hold is wrong if the photometry occurs. sent8: if that the blocking Husserl and the ceramics happens is incorrect then the blocking Husserl does not occur. sent9: the fact that the annulment occurs and the skimming happens is not correct if the patience does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the annulment happens is correct.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: both the patience and the annulment occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the duster does not occur.; sent8 & sent3 -> int3: the blocking Husserl does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the duster occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the annulment does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the nourishment but not the photometry occurs.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the skim does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the skim does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the patience happens. sent2: if the blocking Husserl does not occur then the duster happens. sent3: the fact that the blocking Husserl occurs and the ceramics happens is not correct. sent4: the nourishment but not the photometry happens if the annulment does not occur. sent5: the duster does not occur if both the patience and the annulment occurs. sent6: that that the skimming occurs is triggered by that the nourishment occurs but the photometry does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: that that the duster occurs but the nourishment does not occur hold is wrong if the photometry occurs. sent8: if that the blocking Husserl and the ceramics happens is incorrect then the blocking Husserl does not occur. sent9: the fact that the annulment occurs and the skimming happens is not correct if the patience does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the annulment happens is correct.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: both the patience and the annulment occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the duster does not occur.; sent8 & sent3 -> int3: the blocking Husserl does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the duster occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the annulment does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the nourishment but not the photometry occurs.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__