the Scythian does not occur.
sent1: the bitch and/or the eventfulness occurs. sent2: the fact that that the rush occurs prevents the non-Scythianness is correct. sent3: the relaying occurs. sent4: that the outshouting recruit occurs and the one-stepping happens is brought about by that the networking junkyard does not occur. sent5: the Scythianness does not occur if the one-step and the networking junkyard happens. sent6: the non-cerebralness yields that the augmentation happens and the scam occurs. sent7: if the scam occurs then the rush occurs. sent8: that the relay does not occur is prevented by that the rush does not occur. sent9: if the rush does not occur then both the networking junkyard and the relaying occurs. sent10: if the sculpture does not occur then the fact that the networking M occurs and/or the sedimenting seidel does not occur does not hold. sent11: the non-microcephalicness leads to that the surgicalness does not occur and the networking anticlimax does not occur. sent12: if the Scythianness occurs the fact that the networking junkyard but not the relaying happens is not correct. sent13: that the spanking does not occur prevents the nonsurgicalness. sent14: the rush does not occur. sent15: the fact that either the sculpture happens or the outshouting recruit does not occur or both is wrong. sent16: the sculpture or the outshouting recruit or both occurs. sent17: the leaning does not occur. sent18: that the leaningness does not occur is correct if the leaningness does not occur and/or the outshouting recruit occurs. sent19: the fact that the non-leaningness and the sculpture happens is not right if the outshouting recruit does not occur. sent20: if that not the leaning but the sculpture occurs does not hold then the sculpture does not occur. sent21: the cerebralness does not occur if the surgicalness does not occur and the networking anticlimax does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the sculpture and the non-leaningness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the sculpture happens.; int1 -> int2: the sculpture occurs and/or the outshouting recruit does not occur.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that that the sculpture but not the leaningness occurs does not hold is not false.; sent9 & sent14 -> int5: the networking junkyard and the relaying happens.; int5 -> int6: the networking junkyard happens.;
the Scythian happens.
$hypothesis$ = the Scythian does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the bitch and/or the eventfulness occurs. sent2: the fact that that the rush occurs prevents the non-Scythianness is correct. sent3: the relaying occurs. sent4: that the outshouting recruit occurs and the one-stepping happens is brought about by that the networking junkyard does not occur. sent5: the Scythianness does not occur if the one-step and the networking junkyard happens. sent6: the non-cerebralness yields that the augmentation happens and the scam occurs. sent7: if the scam occurs then the rush occurs. sent8: that the relay does not occur is prevented by that the rush does not occur. sent9: if the rush does not occur then both the networking junkyard and the relaying occurs. sent10: if the sculpture does not occur then the fact that the networking M occurs and/or the sedimenting seidel does not occur does not hold. sent11: the non-microcephalicness leads to that the surgicalness does not occur and the networking anticlimax does not occur. sent12: if the Scythianness occurs the fact that the networking junkyard but not the relaying happens is not correct. sent13: that the spanking does not occur prevents the nonsurgicalness. sent14: the rush does not occur. sent15: the fact that either the sculpture happens or the outshouting recruit does not occur or both is wrong. sent16: the sculpture or the outshouting recruit or both occurs. sent17: the leaning does not occur. sent18: that the leaningness does not occur is correct if the leaningness does not occur and/or the outshouting recruit occurs. sent19: the fact that the non-leaningness and the sculpture happens is not right if the outshouting recruit does not occur. sent20: if that not the leaning but the sculpture occurs does not hold then the sculpture does not occur. sent21: the cerebralness does not occur if the surgicalness does not occur and the networking anticlimax does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the sculpture and the non-leaningness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the sculpture happens.; int1 -> int2: the sculpture occurs and/or the outshouting recruit does not occur.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that that the sculpture but not the leaningness occurs does not hold is not false.; sent9 & sent14 -> int5: the networking junkyard and the relaying happens.; int5 -> int6: the networking junkyard happens.; __UNKNOWN__