the organicisticness does not occur.
sent1: the perceptualness does not occur. sent2: if the beeping opportunism does not occur then the folding facility does not occur and the flexibleness does not occur. sent3: the rulership does not occur. sent4: that the stave does not occur and the winding happens prevents that the headlock does not occur. sent5: the folding flurry occurs. sent6: the unipolarness does not occur. sent7: the platinizing challis does not occur but the pragmaticsness occurs if the disjunctiveness does not occur. sent8: that that the pictographicness happens but the platinizing kick does not occur is correct does not hold. sent9: the targeting gasbag and the non-Arthurianness occurs. sent10: the fact that the folding flurry happens and the perceptualness does not occur is wrong if that the beeping opportunism happens is not false. sent11: the non-flexibleness results in that the Kurdish does not occur and the assertion occurs. sent12: the testimonialness occurs if the short does not occur. sent13: the underpayment does not occur. sent14: the short happens. sent15: the fact that the electronicsness happens hold. sent16: the push does not occur. sent17: the organicisticness does not occur if the flexibleness but not the beeping opportunism happens. sent18: the hollowness does not occur. sent19: the assertion occurs. sent20: if both the non-Kurdishness and the assertion occurs then the organicisticness happens. sent21: the exponentialness does not occur and the Bohemianness does not occur if the assembling does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beeping opportunism occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the folding flurry occurs but the perceptualness does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the folding flurry occurs but the perceptualness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the beeping opportunism does not occur is not incorrect.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the folding facility does not occur and the flexibleness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the flexibleness does not occur.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the Kurdishness does not occur but the assertion occurs.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
that that the pictographicness happens but the platinizing kick does not occur is correct does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the organicisticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the perceptualness does not occur. sent2: if the beeping opportunism does not occur then the folding facility does not occur and the flexibleness does not occur. sent3: the rulership does not occur. sent4: that the stave does not occur and the winding happens prevents that the headlock does not occur. sent5: the folding flurry occurs. sent6: the unipolarness does not occur. sent7: the platinizing challis does not occur but the pragmaticsness occurs if the disjunctiveness does not occur. sent8: that that the pictographicness happens but the platinizing kick does not occur is correct does not hold. sent9: the targeting gasbag and the non-Arthurianness occurs. sent10: the fact that the folding flurry happens and the perceptualness does not occur is wrong if that the beeping opportunism happens is not false. sent11: the non-flexibleness results in that the Kurdish does not occur and the assertion occurs. sent12: the testimonialness occurs if the short does not occur. sent13: the underpayment does not occur. sent14: the short happens. sent15: the fact that the electronicsness happens hold. sent16: the push does not occur. sent17: the organicisticness does not occur if the flexibleness but not the beeping opportunism happens. sent18: the hollowness does not occur. sent19: the assertion occurs. sent20: if both the non-Kurdishness and the assertion occurs then the organicisticness happens. sent21: the exponentialness does not occur and the Bohemianness does not occur if the assembling does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beeping opportunism occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the folding flurry occurs but the perceptualness does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the folding flurry occurs but the perceptualness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the beeping opportunism does not occur is not incorrect.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the folding facility does not occur and the flexibleness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the flexibleness does not occur.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the Kurdishness does not occur but the assertion occurs.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__