the souring does not wrest grail.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a zone is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that the officiant is negative is not wrong the fact that that the dragonfly is a kind of critical thing that does not wrest wedgie hold is incorrect. sent3: that the officiant wrests interpenetration but it is not a manakin is not true if that the crack is not a porcupine hold. sent4: the fact that that something is non-negative thing that is noncritical is wrong if it does not wrest interpenetration is correct. sent5: the pintail is a porcupine and/or a manakin if the Rhabdoviridae does not wrest grail. sent6: if the fact that something is not noncritical and does not wrest wedgie is incorrect it does wrest wedgie. sent7: the souring wrests interpenetration if a manakin does wrest grail. sent8: there exists something such that it is noncritical and is a negative. sent9: the fact that something does not wrest grail if the fact that it is not a negative and it is not critical does not hold is correct. sent10: something is negative. sent11: something is a manakin. sent12: the officiant wrests interpenetration if something that is noncritical is a negative. sent13: the souring does wrest interpenetration if the crack is a kind of a manakin. sent14: there is something such that it does jazz plain and does mystify Skaw. sent15: the souring is not a kind of a manakin. sent16: the souring is Dalmatian. sent17: the crack drifts but it is not prehistoric. sent18: if there is something such that it wrests interpenetration then the souring is not a manakin. sent19: the souring does wrest grail but it is not a manakin if something wrests interpenetration. sent20: the souring does not wrest daisybush. sent21: the officiant is not noncritical but it is drinkable if the souring is a negative. sent22: the crack is not a porcupine if the fact that it is a porcupine and it is not a stretching is false.
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: the officiant does wrest interpenetration.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does wrest interpenetration.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the souring does wrest grail and is not a kind of a manakin.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the souring does not wrest grail.
sent9 -> int4: if the fact that the souring is not a negative but noncritical does not hold then it does not wrest grail.; sent4 -> int5: if the souring does not wrest interpenetration then that it is not negative and it is noncritical is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the souring does not wrest grail. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a zone is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that the officiant is negative is not wrong the fact that that the dragonfly is a kind of critical thing that does not wrest wedgie hold is incorrect. sent3: that the officiant wrests interpenetration but it is not a manakin is not true if that the crack is not a porcupine hold. sent4: the fact that that something is non-negative thing that is noncritical is wrong if it does not wrest interpenetration is correct. sent5: the pintail is a porcupine and/or a manakin if the Rhabdoviridae does not wrest grail. sent6: if the fact that something is not noncritical and does not wrest wedgie is incorrect it does wrest wedgie. sent7: the souring wrests interpenetration if a manakin does wrest grail. sent8: there exists something such that it is noncritical and is a negative. sent9: the fact that something does not wrest grail if the fact that it is not a negative and it is not critical does not hold is correct. sent10: something is negative. sent11: something is a manakin. sent12: the officiant wrests interpenetration if something that is noncritical is a negative. sent13: the souring does wrest interpenetration if the crack is a kind of a manakin. sent14: there is something such that it does jazz plain and does mystify Skaw. sent15: the souring is not a kind of a manakin. sent16: the souring is Dalmatian. sent17: the crack drifts but it is not prehistoric. sent18: if there is something such that it wrests interpenetration then the souring is not a manakin. sent19: the souring does wrest grail but it is not a manakin if something wrests interpenetration. sent20: the souring does not wrest daisybush. sent21: the officiant is not noncritical but it is drinkable if the souring is a negative. sent22: the crack is not a porcupine if the fact that it is a porcupine and it is not a stretching is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: the officiant does wrest interpenetration.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does wrest interpenetration.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the souring does wrest grail and is not a kind of a manakin.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__