that the chestnut is flowerless is not wrong.
sent1: the fact that something is ascitic but it is not ovine is false if it is not nonconformist. sent2: if there is something such that it is a kind of a hame that is conformist then the anthophyllite is not ovine. sent3: if the anthophyllite is not flowerless the chestnut is flowerless thing that is not ascitic. sent4: there is something such that it is a hame and it is a kind of a conformist. sent5: if that the anthophyllite is both fit and not flowerless does not hold then it is ovine. sent6: the chestnut is a conformist but it is not peaty.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the anthophyllite is a fit that is not flowerless is wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the anthophyllite is ovine.; sent4 & sent2 -> int2: the anthophyllite is not ovine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the anthophyllite is fit but not flowerless.; int4 -> int5: the anthophyllite is not flowerless.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the chestnut is flowerless thing that is non-ascitic.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the chestnut is not flowerless.
sent1 -> int7: that the anthophyllite is ascitic but it is non-ovine is false if it is conformist.;
$hypothesis$ = that the chestnut is flowerless is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is ascitic but it is not ovine is false if it is not nonconformist. sent2: if there is something such that it is a kind of a hame that is conformist then the anthophyllite is not ovine. sent3: if the anthophyllite is not flowerless the chestnut is flowerless thing that is not ascitic. sent4: there is something such that it is a hame and it is a kind of a conformist. sent5: if that the anthophyllite is both fit and not flowerless does not hold then it is ovine. sent6: the chestnut is a conformist but it is not peaty. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the anthophyllite is a fit that is not flowerless is wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the anthophyllite is ovine.; sent4 & sent2 -> int2: the anthophyllite is not ovine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the anthophyllite is fit but not flowerless.; int4 -> int5: the anthophyllite is not flowerless.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the chestnut is flowerless thing that is non-ascitic.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__