there exists something such that that it is not a Stalinist and it is single-lane is not true.
sent1: the nevirapine is a bantering and it is a kind of a Alexandrian if there is something such that it is a kind of a Stalinist. sent2: if something is not Stalinist then the fact that it does not sail and it is a kind of a bantering does not hold. sent3: the fact that there is something such that it is immunotherapeutic is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that something is not a Stalinist but single-lane is not true if it does not bastinado Goodyear. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a Stalinist and it is single-lane does not hold. sent6: something is a kind of a sailing if that it is a kind of non-Alexandrian thing that is not immunotherapeutic does not hold. sent7: something is not a Stalinist and it is not a bantering if it bastinados Goodyear. sent8: the fact that the nevirapine is Stalinist and single-lane is incorrect. sent9: the nevirapine does not bastinado Goodyear if the quaker is a bantering. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Stalinist and is single-lane. sent11: that the fact that the nevirapine is not Alexandrian and not immunotherapeutic is not false does not hold if the quaker is not a kind of a bantering. sent12: that the quaker is not a bantering but it is a kind of a Stalinist is not correct. sent13: the nevirapine is Stalinist and/or it is a sailing. sent14: the quaker sails. sent15: either the quaker is a startle or it does overreach glissade or both. sent16: if something is immunotherapeutic then the quaker sails and it is a Alexandrian. sent17: if the fact that the nevirapine does not bastinado Goodyear is right then the fact that it is a kind of a Stalinist and it is single-lane is not correct. sent18: if something does not bastinado Goodyear the fact that it is a Stalinist that is single-lane is false. sent19: the quaker is a sailing if something is immunotherapeutic. sent20: the quaker is not a kind of a bantering if the mafioso is a kind of non-Stalinist thing that is not a bantering.
sent3 & sent16 -> int1: the quaker is a sailing and is a Alexandrian.; int1 -> int2: the quaker is a Alexandrian.; int2 -> int3: the quaker either is a Alexandrian or is a bantering or both.; sent4 -> int4: if the nevirapine does not bastinado Goodyear then the fact that it is both not a Stalinist and single-lane is not correct.;
the nevirapine sails.
sent6 -> int5: the nevirapine is a sailing if that it is a kind of non-Alexandrian thing that is not immunotherapeutic is incorrect.; sent7 -> int6: the mafioso is non-Stalinist thing that is not a bantering if it does bastinado Goodyear.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it is not a Stalinist and it is single-lane is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the nevirapine is a bantering and it is a kind of a Alexandrian if there is something such that it is a kind of a Stalinist. sent2: if something is not Stalinist then the fact that it does not sail and it is a kind of a bantering does not hold. sent3: the fact that there is something such that it is immunotherapeutic is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that something is not a Stalinist but single-lane is not true if it does not bastinado Goodyear. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a Stalinist and it is single-lane does not hold. sent6: something is a kind of a sailing if that it is a kind of non-Alexandrian thing that is not immunotherapeutic does not hold. sent7: something is not a Stalinist and it is not a bantering if it bastinados Goodyear. sent8: the fact that the nevirapine is Stalinist and single-lane is incorrect. sent9: the nevirapine does not bastinado Goodyear if the quaker is a bantering. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Stalinist and is single-lane. sent11: that the fact that the nevirapine is not Alexandrian and not immunotherapeutic is not false does not hold if the quaker is not a kind of a bantering. sent12: that the quaker is not a bantering but it is a kind of a Stalinist is not correct. sent13: the nevirapine is Stalinist and/or it is a sailing. sent14: the quaker sails. sent15: either the quaker is a startle or it does overreach glissade or both. sent16: if something is immunotherapeutic then the quaker sails and it is a Alexandrian. sent17: if the fact that the nevirapine does not bastinado Goodyear is right then the fact that it is a kind of a Stalinist and it is single-lane is not correct. sent18: if something does not bastinado Goodyear the fact that it is a Stalinist that is single-lane is false. sent19: the quaker is a sailing if something is immunotherapeutic. sent20: the quaker is not a kind of a bantering if the mafioso is a kind of non-Stalinist thing that is not a bantering. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent16 -> int1: the quaker is a sailing and is a Alexandrian.; int1 -> int2: the quaker is a Alexandrian.; int2 -> int3: the quaker either is a Alexandrian or is a bantering or both.; sent4 -> int4: if the nevirapine does not bastinado Goodyear then the fact that it is both not a Stalinist and single-lane is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__