the radiophotograph invests rbi.
sent1: the pasqueflower is an operative. sent2: the chamberlain is a kind of a spic if there is something such that it is a siltstone and it is not a kind of a eaglet. sent3: the radiophotograph is not a kind of a eaglet. sent4: if the pasqueflower is operative then it is a siltstone and it is not a eaglet. sent5: if the chamberlain is a kind of a spic that the radiophotograph is a kind of a rubidium is correct. sent6: that something does invest rbi if it is a rubidium is not false.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: that the pasqueflower is a siltstone but it is not a eaglet is not false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a siltstone and is not a eaglet.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the chamberlain is a kind of a spic.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the radiophotograph is a rubidium.; sent6 -> int5: the radiophotograph does invest rbi if it is a rubidium.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the radiophotograph invests rbi. ; $context$ = sent1: the pasqueflower is an operative. sent2: the chamberlain is a kind of a spic if there is something such that it is a siltstone and it is not a kind of a eaglet. sent3: the radiophotograph is not a kind of a eaglet. sent4: if the pasqueflower is operative then it is a siltstone and it is not a eaglet. sent5: if the chamberlain is a kind of a spic that the radiophotograph is a kind of a rubidium is correct. sent6: that something does invest rbi if it is a rubidium is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: that the pasqueflower is a siltstone but it is not a eaglet is not false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a siltstone and is not a eaglet.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the chamberlain is a kind of a spic.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the radiophotograph is a rubidium.; sent6 -> int5: the radiophotograph does invest rbi if it is a rubidium.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__