the moneymaker is a kind of a latchkey.
sent1: the moneymaker is a resuscitator if it does not cultivate and is cognitive. sent2: either something is not a kind of a latchkey or it is a kind of a gadgetry or both if it is autotelic. sent3: the moneymaker does not neglect mimosa and is a Burgoyne. sent4: the moneymaker neglects mimosa if it is a Laughton. sent5: if the fact that something is not a Fagin but it is a drivel is false then the fact that it is not a drivel is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the Tungusic is a kind of a Seljuk and does not neglect continuant is wrong if it is anastigmatic. sent7: if the Tungusic is non-stagflationary thing that is not a hogchoker it is not a kind of a crookedness. sent8: if the Tungusic does induct and is not a mailbox then the naphthalene does not induct. sent9: the Tungusic is anastigmatic. sent10: that the scenario does neglect mimosa hold. sent11: something is autotelic if the fact that it does fledge and it is not a sadhe is not correct. sent12: if the beignet is not loopy and is a gadgetry it is a kind of an attendance. sent13: the Tungusic is a kind of non-stagflationary thing that is not a hogchoker. sent14: the fact that that something fledges and is not a sadhe is right does not hold if it is not electromagnetic. sent15: the amygdalin is not electromagnetic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not sentimentalise mother-in-law and it is cardiovascular is false. sent16: something is not a mailbox and does discriminate if it is not a crookedness. sent17: something is a kind of a gadgetry that is a latchkey if it is not autotelic. sent18: something does induct if the fact that that it is a kind of a Seljuk that does not neglect continuant hold does not hold. sent19: the fact that the naphthalene is not a Fagin but a drivel does not hold if it does not induct. sent20: the fact that something does not sentimentalise mother-in-law and is cardiovascular does not hold if it is not a kind of a drivel. sent21: the moneymaker is a latchkey if it is a gadgetry.
the moneymaker is not a kind of a latchkey.
sent2 -> int1: the amygdalin is not a latchkey or it is a gadgetry or both if it is not non-autotelic.; sent11 -> int2: if that the amygdalin does fledge and is not a sadhe is not right then it is autotelic.; sent14 -> int3: that that the amygdalin does fledge but it is not a sadhe is not false is incorrect if the fact that it is not electromagnetic hold.; sent20 -> int4: that the naphthalene does not sentimentalise mother-in-law and is cardiovascular does not hold if it does not drivel.; sent5 -> int5: the naphthalene is not a kind of a drivel if the fact that it is not a Fagin but a drivel is not correct.; sent18 -> int6: if the fact that the Tungusic is a Seljuk that does not neglect continuant is incorrect then it does induct.; sent6 & sent9 -> int7: that the Tungusic is a kind of Seljuk thing that does not neglect continuant is not true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Tungusic inducts.; sent16 -> int9: if the Tungusic is not a kind of a crookedness the fact that it is not a mailbox and it discriminates hold.; sent7 & sent13 -> int10: the Tungusic is not a crookedness.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Tungusic is both not a mailbox and discriminating.; int11 -> int12: the Tungusic is not a kind of a mailbox.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the Tungusic inducts and is not a mailbox.; sent8 & int13 -> int14: the naphthalene does not induct.; sent19 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the naphthalene is not a Fagin and does drivel is not correct.; int5 & int15 -> int16: that the naphthalene is not a drivel is not wrong.; int4 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the naphthalene does not sentimentalise mother-in-law but it is cardiovascular does not hold.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that that it does not sentimentalise mother-in-law and it is cardiovascular does not hold.; int18 & sent15 -> int19: the amygdalin is not electromagnetic.; int3 & int19 -> int20: the fact that the amygdalin fledges but it is not a kind of a sadhe does not hold.; int2 & int20 -> int21: the amygdalin is autotelic.; int1 & int21 -> int22: the amygdalin is not a kind of a latchkey and/or is a gadgetry.; int22 -> int23: there exists something such that it is not a latchkey and/or it is a gadgetry.;
$hypothesis$ = the moneymaker is a kind of a latchkey. ; $context$ = sent1: the moneymaker is a resuscitator if it does not cultivate and is cognitive. sent2: either something is not a kind of a latchkey or it is a kind of a gadgetry or both if it is autotelic. sent3: the moneymaker does not neglect mimosa and is a Burgoyne. sent4: the moneymaker neglects mimosa if it is a Laughton. sent5: if the fact that something is not a Fagin but it is a drivel is false then the fact that it is not a drivel is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the Tungusic is a kind of a Seljuk and does not neglect continuant is wrong if it is anastigmatic. sent7: if the Tungusic is non-stagflationary thing that is not a hogchoker it is not a kind of a crookedness. sent8: if the Tungusic does induct and is not a mailbox then the naphthalene does not induct. sent9: the Tungusic is anastigmatic. sent10: that the scenario does neglect mimosa hold. sent11: something is autotelic if the fact that it does fledge and it is not a sadhe is not correct. sent12: if the beignet is not loopy and is a gadgetry it is a kind of an attendance. sent13: the Tungusic is a kind of non-stagflationary thing that is not a hogchoker. sent14: the fact that that something fledges and is not a sadhe is right does not hold if it is not electromagnetic. sent15: the amygdalin is not electromagnetic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not sentimentalise mother-in-law and it is cardiovascular is false. sent16: something is not a mailbox and does discriminate if it is not a crookedness. sent17: something is a kind of a gadgetry that is a latchkey if it is not autotelic. sent18: something does induct if the fact that that it is a kind of a Seljuk that does not neglect continuant hold does not hold. sent19: the fact that the naphthalene is not a Fagin but a drivel does not hold if it does not induct. sent20: the fact that something does not sentimentalise mother-in-law and is cardiovascular does not hold if it is not a kind of a drivel. sent21: the moneymaker is a latchkey if it is a gadgetry. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__