the nibbler does not diminish.
sent1: the fact that the collectivist is not a crore and not nonaddictive is not true. sent2: if something is caudal then it does diminish. sent3: the nibbler diminishes if it is nonaddictive. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is not a crore and it is not nonaddictive is incorrect the nibbler is caudal.
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a crore and it is not nonaddictive is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the nibbler is caudal.; sent2 -> int3: the nibbler does diminish if it is caudal.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the nibbler does not diminish. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the collectivist is not a crore and not nonaddictive is not true. sent2: if something is caudal then it does diminish. sent3: the nibbler diminishes if it is nonaddictive. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is not a crore and it is not nonaddictive is incorrect the nibbler is caudal. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a crore and it is not nonaddictive is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the nibbler is caudal.; sent2 -> int3: the nibbler does diminish if it is caudal.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__