that the fact that the splaying bargain or the considerateness or both happens is right is incorrect.
sent1: the splaying incoherence happens. sent2: the castration does not occur if both the secretaryship and the communicating balker occurs. sent3: that the heist does not occur is caused by that the abidance does not occur. sent4: the ictalness occurs. sent5: if the COMINT occurs and the accusativeness happens then the communicating weald does not occur. sent6: the spraying wood occurs if the fact that the spraying trinketry does not occur but the midiness occurs is incorrect. sent7: the mismanagement does not occur if the anaphrodisiacness does not occur. sent8: the bungling occurs. sent9: that the splaying bargain occurs and/or the considerateness occurs is not right if that the bungling does not occur is true. sent10: that the splaying incoherence happens is prevented by that the bungling happens and the abidance occurs. sent11: if the heist does not occur then the fact that not the communicating ibuprofen but the slurping occurs is false. sent12: that the splaying bargain happens is triggered by that the slurping does not occur. sent13: the spike occurs. sent14: the splaying bargain occurs if that not the communicating ibuprofen but the slurping happens is not true. sent15: the chronicness and the mass-producing Hyperborean happens. sent16: the pavage does not occur. sent17: that the spraying grazier does not occur prevents the preamble. sent18: that not the castration but the splaying aglet occurs causes that the communicating ibuprofen does not occur. sent19: the dissidence does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abidance occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: both the bungling and the abidance happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the splaying incoherence does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the abidance does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the heist does not occur.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that not the communicating ibuprofen but the slurping happens is not correct.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that the splaying bargain occurs is correct.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the splaying bargain occurs or the considerateness occurs or both is not true.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the splaying bargain or the considerateness or both happens is right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the splaying incoherence happens. sent2: the castration does not occur if both the secretaryship and the communicating balker occurs. sent3: that the heist does not occur is caused by that the abidance does not occur. sent4: the ictalness occurs. sent5: if the COMINT occurs and the accusativeness happens then the communicating weald does not occur. sent6: the spraying wood occurs if the fact that the spraying trinketry does not occur but the midiness occurs is incorrect. sent7: the mismanagement does not occur if the anaphrodisiacness does not occur. sent8: the bungling occurs. sent9: that the splaying bargain occurs and/or the considerateness occurs is not right if that the bungling does not occur is true. sent10: that the splaying incoherence happens is prevented by that the bungling happens and the abidance occurs. sent11: if the heist does not occur then the fact that not the communicating ibuprofen but the slurping occurs is false. sent12: that the splaying bargain happens is triggered by that the slurping does not occur. sent13: the spike occurs. sent14: the splaying bargain occurs if that not the communicating ibuprofen but the slurping happens is not true. sent15: the chronicness and the mass-producing Hyperborean happens. sent16: the pavage does not occur. sent17: that the spraying grazier does not occur prevents the preamble. sent18: that not the castration but the splaying aglet occurs causes that the communicating ibuprofen does not occur. sent19: the dissidence does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abidance occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: both the bungling and the abidance happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the splaying incoherence does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the abidance does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the heist does not occur.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that not the communicating ibuprofen but the slurping happens is not correct.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that the splaying bargain occurs is correct.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__