that the cochineal is a mound but it is not Bantoid is not true.
sent1: the fact that something is supervisory and it is a kind of a Malebranche is false if it is not analogous. sent2: the rubicelle is microbial. sent3: the rubicelle does deglaze life if something that is not a Kampala is not microbial. sent4: the fact that the rubicelle is not a do-si-do but it pontificates is wrong. sent5: something is not a Kampala but it is not non-microbial. sent6: if the ichor does deglaze life that the cochineal is a kind of an evolution is right. sent7: something is not microbial. sent8: something is not a kind of a Kampala. sent9: that the cochineal is a mound and is Bantoid is false. sent10: the ichor is an evolution. sent11: if the ichor is a kind of an evolution then it is microbial. sent12: there exists something such that it does not deglaze life and it is not Bantoid. sent13: the pharmacy is not microbial. sent14: if there is something such that it does deglaze life the fact that the cochineal is a mound and is not Bantoid does not hold. sent15: something is non-supervisory if that it is non-supervisory a Malebranche does not hold. sent16: a non-supervisory thing ferments and/or deglazes life. sent17: the fact that the cochineal does mound and it is Bantoid is not right if there exists something such that it does deglaze life. sent18: the bushtit is generative. sent19: if something is an evolution it is a mound. sent20: the rubicelle is a Kampala if the fact that it is not a do-si-do and pontificates is not right. sent21: the ichor deglazes life if the pharmacy does deglazes life. sent22: if the ichor is microbial the pharmacy is not microbial. sent23: that the pharmacy is not a Kampala and is not microbial hold if the ichor is microbial. sent24: the pharmacy is not analogous and it is not a swivel.
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: that the ichor is microbial is not incorrect.; sent23 & int1 -> int2: the pharmacy is not a Kampala and not microbial.; int2 -> int3: something is both not a Kampala and not microbial.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the rubicelle deglazes life.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it does deglaze life.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the cochineal is a mound and is not Bantoid.
sent19 -> int6: if the cochineal is an evolution then it does mound.; sent16 -> int7: if the pharmacy is non-supervisory it is a kind of a ferment and/or deglazes life.; sent15 -> int8: if that the fact that the pharmacy is both supervisory and a Malebranche does not hold is right then it is not supervisory.; sent1 -> int9: the fact that the pharmacy is supervisory and it is a Malebranche is incorrect if it is not analogous.; sent24 -> int10: the pharmacy is not analogous.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the pharmacy is a kind of supervisory a Malebranche does not hold.; int8 & int11 -> int12: that the pharmacy is not supervisory hold.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the pharmacy is a kind of a ferment and/or deglazes life.; sent20 & sent4 -> int14: the rubicelle is a kind of a Kampala.; int14 & sent2 -> int15: the rubicelle is a Kampala and microbial.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is a kind of a Kampala and it is microbial.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cochineal is a mound but it is not Bantoid is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is supervisory and it is a kind of a Malebranche is false if it is not analogous. sent2: the rubicelle is microbial. sent3: the rubicelle does deglaze life if something that is not a Kampala is not microbial. sent4: the fact that the rubicelle is not a do-si-do but it pontificates is wrong. sent5: something is not a Kampala but it is not non-microbial. sent6: if the ichor does deglaze life that the cochineal is a kind of an evolution is right. sent7: something is not microbial. sent8: something is not a kind of a Kampala. sent9: that the cochineal is a mound and is Bantoid is false. sent10: the ichor is an evolution. sent11: if the ichor is a kind of an evolution then it is microbial. sent12: there exists something such that it does not deglaze life and it is not Bantoid. sent13: the pharmacy is not microbial. sent14: if there is something such that it does deglaze life the fact that the cochineal is a mound and is not Bantoid does not hold. sent15: something is non-supervisory if that it is non-supervisory a Malebranche does not hold. sent16: a non-supervisory thing ferments and/or deglazes life. sent17: the fact that the cochineal does mound and it is Bantoid is not right if there exists something such that it does deglaze life. sent18: the bushtit is generative. sent19: if something is an evolution it is a mound. sent20: the rubicelle is a Kampala if the fact that it is not a do-si-do and pontificates is not right. sent21: the ichor deglazes life if the pharmacy does deglazes life. sent22: if the ichor is microbial the pharmacy is not microbial. sent23: that the pharmacy is not a Kampala and is not microbial hold if the ichor is microbial. sent24: the pharmacy is not analogous and it is not a swivel. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: that the ichor is microbial is not incorrect.; sent23 & int1 -> int2: the pharmacy is not a Kampala and not microbial.; int2 -> int3: something is both not a Kampala and not microbial.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the rubicelle deglazes life.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it does deglaze life.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__