the borage does destabilize.
sent1: if there is something such that it smells that the arbutus avoids syndicator is true. sent2: something is a smell. sent3: the teak does not zone Alexandrian if the staghound does not avoid packer and zone Alexandrian. sent4: the fact that the arbutus does avoid syndicator and/or it is not a smell does not hold if the cittern corresponds clogged. sent5: if the fact that that the arbutus does avoid syndicator and/or is not a smell is incorrect is right then the borage does not destabilize. sent6: the farce does correspond borage. sent7: the borage does destabilize if the arbutus avoids syndicator.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the arbutus avoids syndicator.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the borage does not destabilize.
$hypothesis$ = the borage does destabilize. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it smells that the arbutus avoids syndicator is true. sent2: something is a smell. sent3: the teak does not zone Alexandrian if the staghound does not avoid packer and zone Alexandrian. sent4: the fact that the arbutus does avoid syndicator and/or it is not a smell does not hold if the cittern corresponds clogged. sent5: if the fact that that the arbutus does avoid syndicator and/or is not a smell is incorrect is right then the borage does not destabilize. sent6: the farce does correspond borage. sent7: the borage does destabilize if the arbutus avoids syndicator. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the arbutus avoids syndicator.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__