the dame is a gadolinium and is a shimmer.
sent1: something is a kind of a gadolinium if that it is not a Kura and is not a gadolinium is not correct. sent2: the fact that the fact that the dame is a gadolinium and shimmers is not right if the acrylic is not Episcopal hold. sent3: that something is not a Kura and is not a kind of a gadolinium is incorrect if it is not Episcopal. sent4: the acrylic does not shimmer if the fact that the dame is a gadolinium is not false. sent5: the vicar-general is not nonpsychoactive if the fact that the teratogen is not legless and/or it is not nonpsychoactive is false. sent6: if the fact that something is Hispaniolan is true it does not besot Blighty. sent7: if something that is not an orthography does lysogenize clogging the chairlift is a Senegalese. sent8: the chromatin subrogates Devi. sent9: if the chairlift is Senegalese that the streptothricin is Hispaniolan but not agrobiologic is wrong. sent10: the baster is Hispaniolan if the fact that the streptothricin is Hispaniolan thing that is not agrobiologic does not hold. sent11: the dame is not Episcopal if the mulch is a Appalachians. sent12: the fact that the plaiter is not an orthography and lysogenizes clogging is not incorrect if the chromatin does subrogate Devi. sent13: the fact that the acrylic is a kind of non-amenorrheic thing that does not besot streptothricin does not hold. sent14: if there is something such that it is not nonpsychoactive the mulch is not catoptric. sent15: if the baster does not besot Blighty that the teratogen is not legless and/or it is not nonpsychoactive is incorrect. sent16: if something is not catoptric it is a Appalachians or it is not Episcopal or both. sent17: if the acrylic besots streptothricin then it is not Episcopal. sent18: if the fact that the acrylic is a kind of non-amenorrheic thing that does not besot streptothricin is not right it is not Episcopal.
sent18 & sent13 -> int1: the acrylic is not Episcopal.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the acrylic is not a shimmer is not incorrect.
sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the dame is not a Kura and it is not a kind of a gadolinium is incorrect then it is a gadolinium.; sent3 -> int3: if the dame is not Episcopal then the fact that it is not a kind of a Kura and it is not a gadolinium is not right.; sent16 -> int4: if the mulch is not catoptric it is a kind of a Appalachians or is not Episcopal or both.; sent6 -> int5: the baster does not besot Blighty if that it is Hispaniolan is not wrong.; sent12 & sent8 -> int6: the plaiter is not an orthography but it does lysogenize clogging.; int6 -> int7: something is not an orthography but it does lysogenize clogging.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the chairlift is a Senegalese.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the streptothricin is Hispaniolan and is not agrobiologic is wrong.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the baster is Hispaniolan is not incorrect.; int5 & int10 -> int11: that the baster does not besot Blighty is right.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: that the teratogen is legged or it is psychoactive or both is false.; sent5 & int12 -> int13: the vicar-general is not nonpsychoactive.; int13 -> int14: something is not nonpsychoactive.; int14 & sent14 -> int15: the mulch is not catoptric.; int4 & int15 -> int16: the mulch is a Appalachians and/or it is not Episcopal.;
$hypothesis$ = the dame is a gadolinium and is a shimmer. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a gadolinium if that it is not a Kura and is not a gadolinium is not correct. sent2: the fact that the fact that the dame is a gadolinium and shimmers is not right if the acrylic is not Episcopal hold. sent3: that something is not a Kura and is not a kind of a gadolinium is incorrect if it is not Episcopal. sent4: the acrylic does not shimmer if the fact that the dame is a gadolinium is not false. sent5: the vicar-general is not nonpsychoactive if the fact that the teratogen is not legless and/or it is not nonpsychoactive is false. sent6: if the fact that something is Hispaniolan is true it does not besot Blighty. sent7: if something that is not an orthography does lysogenize clogging the chairlift is a Senegalese. sent8: the chromatin subrogates Devi. sent9: if the chairlift is Senegalese that the streptothricin is Hispaniolan but not agrobiologic is wrong. sent10: the baster is Hispaniolan if the fact that the streptothricin is Hispaniolan thing that is not agrobiologic does not hold. sent11: the dame is not Episcopal if the mulch is a Appalachians. sent12: the fact that the plaiter is not an orthography and lysogenizes clogging is not incorrect if the chromatin does subrogate Devi. sent13: the fact that the acrylic is a kind of non-amenorrheic thing that does not besot streptothricin does not hold. sent14: if there is something such that it is not nonpsychoactive the mulch is not catoptric. sent15: if the baster does not besot Blighty that the teratogen is not legless and/or it is not nonpsychoactive is incorrect. sent16: if something is not catoptric it is a Appalachians or it is not Episcopal or both. sent17: if the acrylic besots streptothricin then it is not Episcopal. sent18: if the fact that the acrylic is a kind of non-amenorrheic thing that does not besot streptothricin is not right it is not Episcopal. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent13 -> int1: the acrylic is not Episcopal.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__