the oilman does not lap poorhouse.
sent1: that the alley does lap bioterrorism and does not originate is incorrect. sent2: the alley is not gnomic and it does not lap bioterrorism if it is a kind of a normothermia. sent3: that the lathi is the interest if the lathi is a kind of a normothermia is not wrong. sent4: if either the alley is not a viverrine or it originates or both the lathi does not scale kindliness. sent5: the oilman does not lap poorhouse if that the lathi does not lap poorhouse and it does not scale oarfish is not right. sent6: something that laps bioterrorism is a kind of a normothermia. sent7: if something is not phonetic then the fact that it does not lap poorhouse and it does not scale oarfish is not true. sent8: the alley is not a normothermia but a viverrine. sent9: the oilman does lap poorhouse if there is something such that it does not scale kindliness and it interests. sent10: there exists nothing such that it is non-gnomic thing that is an interest. sent11: something scales oarfish. sent12: something is pictographic if it tops. sent13: something laps bioterrorism if that it is phonetic and it is not gnomic does not hold. sent14: that something is gnomic but it does not lap bioterrorism is wrong if it is not a kind of a normothermia. sent15: everything is not a viverrine or it originates or both. sent16: the fact that the lathi is phonetic but not gnomic is not correct if something scales oarfish. sent17: either the alley is a viverrine or it does originate or both.
sent11 & sent16 -> int1: that the lathi is both phonetic and not gnomic is not right.; sent13 -> int2: if that the lathi is both phonetic and not gnomic is not correct it laps bioterrorism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lathi laps bioterrorism.; sent6 -> int4: that the lathi is a kind of a normothermia hold if it laps bioterrorism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the lathi is a normothermia.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the lathi is an interest is not incorrect.; sent15 -> int7: the alley is not a viverrine and/or it does originate.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the lathi does not scale kindliness.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the lathi does not scale kindliness and interests.; int9 -> int10: something does not scale kindliness and is an interest.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the permanganate is a normothermia.
sent10 -> int11: the fact that the oilman is non-gnomic thing that is an interest is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the oilman does not lap poorhouse. ; $context$ = sent1: that the alley does lap bioterrorism and does not originate is incorrect. sent2: the alley is not gnomic and it does not lap bioterrorism if it is a kind of a normothermia. sent3: that the lathi is the interest if the lathi is a kind of a normothermia is not wrong. sent4: if either the alley is not a viverrine or it originates or both the lathi does not scale kindliness. sent5: the oilman does not lap poorhouse if that the lathi does not lap poorhouse and it does not scale oarfish is not right. sent6: something that laps bioterrorism is a kind of a normothermia. sent7: if something is not phonetic then the fact that it does not lap poorhouse and it does not scale oarfish is not true. sent8: the alley is not a normothermia but a viverrine. sent9: the oilman does lap poorhouse if there is something such that it does not scale kindliness and it interests. sent10: there exists nothing such that it is non-gnomic thing that is an interest. sent11: something scales oarfish. sent12: something is pictographic if it tops. sent13: something laps bioterrorism if that it is phonetic and it is not gnomic does not hold. sent14: that something is gnomic but it does not lap bioterrorism is wrong if it is not a kind of a normothermia. sent15: everything is not a viverrine or it originates or both. sent16: the fact that the lathi is phonetic but not gnomic is not correct if something scales oarfish. sent17: either the alley is a viverrine or it does originate or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent16 -> int1: that the lathi is both phonetic and not gnomic is not right.; sent13 -> int2: if that the lathi is both phonetic and not gnomic is not correct it laps bioterrorism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lathi laps bioterrorism.; sent6 -> int4: that the lathi is a kind of a normothermia hold if it laps bioterrorism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the lathi is a normothermia.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the lathi is an interest is not incorrect.; sent15 -> int7: the alley is not a viverrine and/or it does originate.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the lathi does not scale kindliness.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the lathi does not scale kindliness and interests.; int9 -> int10: something does not scale kindliness and is an interest.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__