the scientist is not univalve and/or it does not stable Gwyn.
sent1: the produce does not risk hogchoker if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a gerontologist and does stable line is incorrect. sent2: if there is something such that it does not risk hogchoker then the produce is a rotgut. sent3: the stabilizer is not a rotgut if that the scientist is non-univalve and/or it does not stable Gwyn is not true. sent4: if there are non-Wiccan things the produce risks hogchoker. sent5: the sphere is not a Wiccan. sent6: if the stabilizer is not a rotgut then the fact that the aftereffect is not a gerontologist and stables line is not right. sent7: if something is a gerontologist then the fact that it is not parturient and/or is not a rotgut does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the scientist is not univalve or it does not stable Gwyn or both is not true.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the stabilizer is not a rotgut.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the aftereffect is not a gerontologist and stables line is false.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a gerontologist and stables line does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the produce does not risk hogchoker.; sent5 -> int5: there are non-Wiccan things.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the produce does risk hogchoker.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Grecian is not parturient and/or it is not a rotgut is not true.
sent7 -> int8: if the Grecian is a gerontologist then the fact that it is not parturient and/or it is not a rotgut is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the scientist is not univalve and/or it does not stable Gwyn. ; $context$ = sent1: the produce does not risk hogchoker if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a gerontologist and does stable line is incorrect. sent2: if there is something such that it does not risk hogchoker then the produce is a rotgut. sent3: the stabilizer is not a rotgut if that the scientist is non-univalve and/or it does not stable Gwyn is not true. sent4: if there are non-Wiccan things the produce risks hogchoker. sent5: the sphere is not a Wiccan. sent6: if the stabilizer is not a rotgut then the fact that the aftereffect is not a gerontologist and stables line is not right. sent7: if something is a gerontologist then the fact that it is not parturient and/or is not a rotgut does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the scientist is not univalve or it does not stable Gwyn or both is not true.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the stabilizer is not a rotgut.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the aftereffect is not a gerontologist and stables line is false.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a gerontologist and stables line does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the produce does not risk hogchoker.; sent5 -> int5: there are non-Wiccan things.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the produce does risk hogchoker.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__