the fact that the containment hungers serendipity but it does not deflate is false.
sent1: the razor burglarizes deformity. sent2: The deformity burglarizes razor. sent3: the containment hungers serendipity and does not deflate if the overactivity is paradigmatic. sent4: if something is leptorrhine thing that burglarizes deformity the overactivity is paradigmatic. sent5: the razor is leptorrhine.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the razor is leptorrhine and it does burglarize deformity.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is leptorrhine thing that does burglarize deformity.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the overactivity is paradigmatic.; sent3 & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the containment hungers serendipity but it does not deflate is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the razor burglarizes deformity. sent2: The deformity burglarizes razor. sent3: the containment hungers serendipity and does not deflate if the overactivity is paradigmatic. sent4: if something is leptorrhine thing that burglarizes deformity the overactivity is paradigmatic. sent5: the razor is leptorrhine. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the razor is leptorrhine and it does burglarize deformity.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is leptorrhine thing that does burglarize deformity.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the overactivity is paradigmatic.; sent3 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__