there is something such that if it is not opposable then the fact that it does not prance and/or is economical does not hold.
sent1: if the nail is not economical then that it does not seize and/or it coats Mayenne does not hold. sent2: that the lido either does not warm or is economical or both is incorrect if it is not chaffy. sent3: if the nail is opposable the fact that it does not prance and/or is economical is not correct. sent4: that the fact that the dottle is not a kind of a canine and/or it is an urgency is correct does not hold if the fact that it is not a guest hold. sent5: that there is something such that if it is not opposable then it does not prance or is economical or both is not incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not opposable then the fact that it does prance or is economical or both is not true. sent7: if the nail is not opposable that it does not prance and/or is economical is not true. sent8: the fact that if the nail is not opposable the nail does prance is correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a trouble the fact that either it does not redden lido or it is unregenerate or both does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it is not opposable it is not economical. sent11: there exists something such that if it is opposable then the fact that either it does not prance or it is economical or both is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not opposable then it prances. sent13: there is something such that if it does not shine varicocele the fact that it either is not polemoniaceous or is wieldy or both is not true. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a Pushan the fact that it either is not unchangeable or does shine senega or both is false. sent15: if the nail is not a steak then the fact that it is not an endowment or is a AFSPC or both is wrong. sent16: the nail does not prance and/or it is economical if it is not opposable. sent17: there is something such that if it does not shine washhouse then that it does not accommodate Ascaphidae and/or it is bedless is not correct. sent18: if the nail does not coat smorgasbord that it is not opposable and/or it accommodates Methodism does not hold. sent19: that the praya is not a strawflower and/or it does prance is false if it is not commodious.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not opposable then the fact that it does not prance and/or is economical does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nail is not economical then that it does not seize and/or it coats Mayenne does not hold. sent2: that the lido either does not warm or is economical or both is incorrect if it is not chaffy. sent3: if the nail is opposable the fact that it does not prance and/or is economical is not correct. sent4: that the fact that the dottle is not a kind of a canine and/or it is an urgency is correct does not hold if the fact that it is not a guest hold. sent5: that there is something such that if it is not opposable then it does not prance or is economical or both is not incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not opposable then the fact that it does prance or is economical or both is not true. sent7: if the nail is not opposable that it does not prance and/or is economical is not true. sent8: the fact that if the nail is not opposable the nail does prance is correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a trouble the fact that either it does not redden lido or it is unregenerate or both does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it is not opposable it is not economical. sent11: there exists something such that if it is opposable then the fact that either it does not prance or it is economical or both is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not opposable then it prances. sent13: there is something such that if it does not shine varicocele the fact that it either is not polemoniaceous or is wieldy or both is not true. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a Pushan the fact that it either is not unchangeable or does shine senega or both is false. sent15: if the nail is not a steak then the fact that it is not an endowment or is a AFSPC or both is wrong. sent16: the nail does not prance and/or it is economical if it is not opposable. sent17: there is something such that if it does not shine washhouse then that it does not accommodate Ascaphidae and/or it is bedless is not correct. sent18: if the nail does not coat smorgasbord that it is not opposable and/or it accommodates Methodism does not hold. sent19: that the praya is not a strawflower and/or it does prance is false if it is not commodious. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__