the barbet is not a quadrate and does not satisfice.
sent1: that the boysenberry is both not a optative and indiscreet is not right. sent2: if that something does not direct id and is not a Meridian is incorrect then that it does not satisfice hold. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a blueberry or it is rupestral or both is correct the neem does not diminish Mimir. sent4: if the fact that the fact that the boysenberry is not a optative and it is not discreet hold is not correct then it is not high-resolution. sent5: that something is a blueberry is correct if the fact that it does not submerge is not true. sent6: the pennoncel directs antinomian. sent7: the buttocks does not satisfice. sent8: the barbet is not a quadrate if the neem does not diminish Mimir. sent9: The antinomian directs pennoncel. sent10: something does not diminish Mimir and is not rupestral if that it does not direct id is not false. sent11: if the boysenberry does submerge the fact that the barbet is not a quadrate and does not satisfice is wrong. sent12: if something is a Meridian it does not satisfice. sent13: that the boysenberry is a optative and is not discreet is incorrect. sent14: if the boysenberry is not high-resolution then the chop submerges. sent15: if there exists something such that it is rupestral then the neem does not diminish Mimir. sent16: the fact that the barbet does not direct id and it is not a Meridian is false if the pennoncel directs antinomian.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the boysenberry is not high-resolution is not false.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the chop submerges.; sent5 -> int3: the chop is a kind of a blueberry if it does submerge.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chop is a kind of a blueberry.; int4 -> int5: the chop is a blueberry and/or it is rupestral.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a blueberry and/or is rupestral.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the neem does not diminish Mimir.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the barbet is not a quadrate.; sent2 -> int9: if that the barbet does not direct id and it is not a Meridian does not hold then it does not satisfice.; sent16 & sent6 -> int10: the fact that the barbet does not direct id and it is not a kind of a Meridian is not right.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the barbet does not satisfice.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis;
that the barbet is not a quadrate and it does not satisfice is not right.
sent10 -> int12: the neem does not diminish Mimir and it is not rupestral if it does not direct id.;
$hypothesis$ = the barbet is not a quadrate and does not satisfice. ; $context$ = sent1: that the boysenberry is both not a optative and indiscreet is not right. sent2: if that something does not direct id and is not a Meridian is incorrect then that it does not satisfice hold. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a blueberry or it is rupestral or both is correct the neem does not diminish Mimir. sent4: if the fact that the fact that the boysenberry is not a optative and it is not discreet hold is not correct then it is not high-resolution. sent5: that something is a blueberry is correct if the fact that it does not submerge is not true. sent6: the pennoncel directs antinomian. sent7: the buttocks does not satisfice. sent8: the barbet is not a quadrate if the neem does not diminish Mimir. sent9: The antinomian directs pennoncel. sent10: something does not diminish Mimir and is not rupestral if that it does not direct id is not false. sent11: if the boysenberry does submerge the fact that the barbet is not a quadrate and does not satisfice is wrong. sent12: if something is a Meridian it does not satisfice. sent13: that the boysenberry is a optative and is not discreet is incorrect. sent14: if the boysenberry is not high-resolution then the chop submerges. sent15: if there exists something such that it is rupestral then the neem does not diminish Mimir. sent16: the fact that the barbet does not direct id and it is not a Meridian is false if the pennoncel directs antinomian. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the boysenberry is not high-resolution is not false.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the chop submerges.; sent5 -> int3: the chop is a kind of a blueberry if it does submerge.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chop is a kind of a blueberry.; int4 -> int5: the chop is a blueberry and/or it is rupestral.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a blueberry and/or is rupestral.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the neem does not diminish Mimir.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the barbet is not a quadrate.; sent2 -> int9: if that the barbet does not direct id and it is not a Meridian does not hold then it does not satisfice.; sent16 & sent6 -> int10: the fact that the barbet does not direct id and it is not a kind of a Meridian is not right.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the barbet does not satisfice.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__