the Nasturtium is not politic if the sirenian is bubaline.
sent1: the fact that the liposome is impolitic thing that is not non-husbandly does not hold. sent2: the materialization gins tetrode and disowns deferral. sent3: if the Nasturtium is a commercial that it is ascensional and is nonphotosynthetic is incorrect. sent4: the sirenian is affixal. sent5: the sirenian is bubaline if that the Nasturtium is a kind of non-ascensional thing that is nonphotosynthetic does not hold. sent6: if something is not a kind of a kamikaze then it is poetics and not impolitic. sent7: the Luddite is not bubaline if the fact that the Nasturtium is not a commercial and is not bubaline is incorrect. sent8: the Nasturtium is affixal and it is a steep if the sirenian is not impolitic. sent9: the materialization gins Calder. sent10: that the Nasturtium is a steep and it is poetics is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the Nasturtium is non-ascensional thing that is nonphotosynthetic is not correct if it is a commercial. sent12: the sirenian does not disown copyright. sent13: if the materialization does gin tetrode then the fact that it is a forty is not wrong. sent14: the sirenian is not bubaline if the Nasturtium is ascensional. sent15: the tetrode is not poetics. sent16: the fact that something is noncommercial and is not bubaline does not hold if it is affixal. sent17: the sirenian is a kind of a commercial if the Nasturtium is poetics. sent18: that the Nasturtium is ascensional and it is nonphotosynthetic is not right. sent19: if the fact that the Nasturtium is a kind of a steep and it is poetics is not right then it is not a kind of a steep. sent20: the Nasturtium is a Galen. sent21: something is bubaline if it is a kind of non-commercial thing that is not poetics. sent22: if something is non-affixal thing that is not a kind of a steep it is impolitic. sent23: the sirenian is not bubaline if that the Nasturtium is both non-ascensional and nonphotosynthetic does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Nasturtium is commercial.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the Nasturtium is a kind of non-ascensional thing that is nonphotosynthetic is not true.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the sirenian is not bubaline.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sirenian is not non-bubaline.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Nasturtium is not commercial.; sent19 & sent10 -> int5: the Nasturtium is not a steep.; sent22 -> int6: the Nasturtium is impolitic if it is non-affixal but not a steep.;
that the Luddite is non-bubaline is true.
sent16 -> int7: if the Nasturtium is affixal then that it is non-commercial thing that is not bubaline is false.; sent6 -> int8: if the sirenian is not a kamikaze then it is poetics and is not impolitic.; sent2 -> int9: the fact that the materialization gins tetrode is correct.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the materialization is a forty.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the materialization gins Calder and is a kind of a forty.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it does gin Calder and is a kind of a forty.;
$hypothesis$ = the Nasturtium is not politic if the sirenian is bubaline. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the liposome is impolitic thing that is not non-husbandly does not hold. sent2: the materialization gins tetrode and disowns deferral. sent3: if the Nasturtium is a commercial that it is ascensional and is nonphotosynthetic is incorrect. sent4: the sirenian is affixal. sent5: the sirenian is bubaline if that the Nasturtium is a kind of non-ascensional thing that is nonphotosynthetic does not hold. sent6: if something is not a kind of a kamikaze then it is poetics and not impolitic. sent7: the Luddite is not bubaline if the fact that the Nasturtium is not a commercial and is not bubaline is incorrect. sent8: the Nasturtium is affixal and it is a steep if the sirenian is not impolitic. sent9: the materialization gins Calder. sent10: that the Nasturtium is a steep and it is poetics is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the Nasturtium is non-ascensional thing that is nonphotosynthetic is not correct if it is a commercial. sent12: the sirenian does not disown copyright. sent13: if the materialization does gin tetrode then the fact that it is a forty is not wrong. sent14: the sirenian is not bubaline if the Nasturtium is ascensional. sent15: the tetrode is not poetics. sent16: the fact that something is noncommercial and is not bubaline does not hold if it is affixal. sent17: the sirenian is a kind of a commercial if the Nasturtium is poetics. sent18: that the Nasturtium is ascensional and it is nonphotosynthetic is not right. sent19: if the fact that the Nasturtium is a kind of a steep and it is poetics is not right then it is not a kind of a steep. sent20: the Nasturtium is a Galen. sent21: something is bubaline if it is a kind of non-commercial thing that is not poetics. sent22: if something is non-affixal thing that is not a kind of a steep it is impolitic. sent23: the sirenian is not bubaline if that the Nasturtium is both non-ascensional and nonphotosynthetic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Nasturtium is commercial.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the Nasturtium is a kind of non-ascensional thing that is nonphotosynthetic is not true.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the sirenian is not bubaline.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sirenian is not non-bubaline.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Nasturtium is not commercial.; sent19 & sent10 -> int5: the Nasturtium is not a steep.; sent22 -> int6: the Nasturtium is impolitic if it is non-affixal but not a steep.; __UNKNOWN__