the fact that if that the transparency does not oppose Gathic does not hold the Sassenach is not chimeric and hashes sightseer is not correct.
sent1: if something hashes assiduity then that it does oppose Mendelism hold. sent2: that if the transparency does oppose Gathic and it does hash assiduity the fact that the Sassenach is not chimeric is not incorrect hold. sent3: the Sassenach does not oppose segno. sent4: the amorist does not hash sightseer and is a kind of a meterstick. sent5: something does not oppose Gathic and it does not hash sightseer if it is a kind of a Mauritanian. sent6: the dorbeetle is Mauritanian if something is not Mauritanian or it is not a meterstick or both. sent7: the antimacassar is not a Black but it is a meterstick. sent8: if the amorist does not hash sightseer and is a meterstick the Sassenach does hash sightseer. sent9: either the transparency is a Mauritanian or it is not a kind of a meterstick or both if the Sassenach is a kind of a Ordovician. sent10: if something that does not oppose Gathic does not hash sightseer then it does hash assiduity. sent11: if the Sassenach does not oppose segno then it is a kind of a Ordovician and it is a kind of a flank. sent12: if the amorist does hash sightseer and it is a meterstick the Sassenach hash sightseer. sent13: something does not oppose cellphone but it is chimeric if it does oppose Mendelism. sent14: the transparency does oppose Mendelism and it does hash assiduity.
sent14 -> int1: the transparency hashes assiduity.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transparency opposes Gathic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the transparency opposes Gathic and hashes assiduity.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Sassenach is not chimeric.; sent8 & sent4 -> int4: the Sassenach does hash sightseer.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Sassenach is not chimeric and does hash sightseer.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the dorbeetle does not oppose cellphone and is chimeric.
sent13 -> int6: if the dorbeetle opposes Mendelism it does not oppose cellphone and is chimeric.; sent1 -> int7: if the dorbeetle does hash assiduity then it does oppose Mendelism.; sent10 -> int8: if the dorbeetle does not oppose Gathic and does not hash sightseer then it does hash assiduity.; sent5 -> int9: the dorbeetle does not oppose Gathic and does not hash sightseer if it is Mauritanian.; sent11 & sent3 -> int10: the Sassenach is a Ordovician and it flanks.; int10 -> int11: the Sassenach is a Ordovician.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: the transparency is a Mauritanian and/or not a meterstick.; int12 -> int13: either something is Mauritanian or it is not a kind of a meterstick or both.; int13 & sent6 -> int14: the dorbeetle is a Mauritanian.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the dorbeetle does not oppose Gathic and does not hash sightseer.; int8 & int15 -> int16: the dorbeetle hashes assiduity.; int7 & int16 -> int17: that the dorbeetle does oppose Mendelism is not wrong.; int6 & int17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the transparency does not oppose Gathic does not hold the Sassenach is not chimeric and hashes sightseer is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something hashes assiduity then that it does oppose Mendelism hold. sent2: that if the transparency does oppose Gathic and it does hash assiduity the fact that the Sassenach is not chimeric is not incorrect hold. sent3: the Sassenach does not oppose segno. sent4: the amorist does not hash sightseer and is a kind of a meterstick. sent5: something does not oppose Gathic and it does not hash sightseer if it is a kind of a Mauritanian. sent6: the dorbeetle is Mauritanian if something is not Mauritanian or it is not a meterstick or both. sent7: the antimacassar is not a Black but it is a meterstick. sent8: if the amorist does not hash sightseer and is a meterstick the Sassenach does hash sightseer. sent9: either the transparency is a Mauritanian or it is not a kind of a meterstick or both if the Sassenach is a kind of a Ordovician. sent10: if something that does not oppose Gathic does not hash sightseer then it does hash assiduity. sent11: if the Sassenach does not oppose segno then it is a kind of a Ordovician and it is a kind of a flank. sent12: if the amorist does hash sightseer and it is a meterstick the Sassenach hash sightseer. sent13: something does not oppose cellphone but it is chimeric if it does oppose Mendelism. sent14: the transparency does oppose Mendelism and it does hash assiduity. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the transparency hashes assiduity.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transparency opposes Gathic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the transparency opposes Gathic and hashes assiduity.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Sassenach is not chimeric.; sent8 & sent4 -> int4: the Sassenach does hash sightseer.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Sassenach is not chimeric and does hash sightseer.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__