the incandescence is not a triplicate.
sent1: everything is not a conspicuousness and does not reconstruct. sent2: something does not remodel lepidolite. sent3: that if something is a calyculus then it is not numerate is not wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not remodel lepidolite then the incandescence pilfers. sent5: something that does not emulsify expressed does emulsify bola and/or is a kind of a calyculus. sent6: if something emulsifies bola then it does not numerate. sent7: something that either does pilfer or is a sparkler or both is not a triplicate. sent8: if something that is not a conspicuousness does not reconstruct it does not emulsify expressed. sent9: if something is a sparkler the fact that it does pilfer is correct. sent10: if the incandescence is a sparkler then it does not triplicate. sent11: if something is a sparkler then it is not a triplicate. sent12: if the ancients does pilfer the sire remodels lepidolite.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the incandescence does pilfer.; int1 -> int2: the incandescence pilfers and/or it is a sparkler.; sent7 -> int3: that the incandescence is not a triplicate hold if that it either pilfers or is a sparkler or both is correct.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the incandescence does triplicate.
sent9 -> int4: if the ancients is a sparkler it does pilfer.; sent3 -> int5: if the ancients is a calyculus then it does not numerate.; sent5 -> int6: either the radiotelephone does emulsify bola or it is a calyculus or both if it does not emulsify expressed.; sent8 -> int7: the stonework does not emulsify expressed if it is not a kind of a conspicuousness and it does not reconstruct.; sent1 -> int8: the stonework is not a conspicuousness and it does not reconstruct.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stonework does not emulsify expressed.; int9 -> int10: everything does not emulsify expressed.; int10 -> int11: the radiotelephone does not emulsify expressed.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the radiotelephone emulsifies bola and/or is a calyculus.; int12 -> int13: everything either emulsifies bola or is a kind of a calyculus or both.; int13 -> int14: the ancients does emulsify bola and/or is a calyculus.; sent6 -> int15: if the ancients emulsifies bola then it does not numerate.; int5 & int14 & int15 -> int16: the ancients does not numerate.;
$hypothesis$ = the incandescence is not a triplicate. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is not a conspicuousness and does not reconstruct. sent2: something does not remodel lepidolite. sent3: that if something is a calyculus then it is not numerate is not wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not remodel lepidolite then the incandescence pilfers. sent5: something that does not emulsify expressed does emulsify bola and/or is a kind of a calyculus. sent6: if something emulsifies bola then it does not numerate. sent7: something that either does pilfer or is a sparkler or both is not a triplicate. sent8: if something that is not a conspicuousness does not reconstruct it does not emulsify expressed. sent9: if something is a sparkler the fact that it does pilfer is correct. sent10: if the incandescence is a sparkler then it does not triplicate. sent11: if something is a sparkler then it is not a triplicate. sent12: if the ancients does pilfer the sire remodels lepidolite. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the incandescence does pilfer.; int1 -> int2: the incandescence pilfers and/or it is a sparkler.; sent7 -> int3: that the incandescence is not a triplicate hold if that it either pilfers or is a sparkler or both is correct.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__