that there exists something such that if it does not excise unworthiness and it is not electromotive it is nonfunctional is not right.
sent1: that if a non-inflectional thing does not excise minimization that it is a kind of a Marstan is not false is right. sent2: the coconut is nonfunctional if it is not supernaturalist and is not a Sadducee. sent3: there is something such that if it does not excise unworthiness and it is electromotive then it is nonfunctional. sent4: there is something such that if it does not excise Eyck and does not pander then it is solanaceous. sent5: there exists something such that if it excises unworthiness and is not electromotive then it is nonfunctional. sent6: the Francophobe does derail gravestone if it is nonfunctional and it is not botanic. sent7: something perplexes jog if it is not an absolute and it is not a marcher. sent8: if the Francophobe excises unworthiness but it is not electromotive it is nonfunctional. sent9: if the Francophobe does not excise unworthiness but it is electromotive then it is nonfunctional. sent10: if something that is not a guffaw is not antimagnetic it is a perversion. sent11: that the manageress fellates if the manageress is not Sisyphean but it concocts is right. sent12: if that the Francophobe does not excise unworthiness and is not electromotive hold then it is nonfunctional.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
if the exegete is not inflectional and it does not excise minimization it is a kind of a Marstan.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not excise unworthiness and it is not electromotive it is nonfunctional is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that if a non-inflectional thing does not excise minimization that it is a kind of a Marstan is not false is right. sent2: the coconut is nonfunctional if it is not supernaturalist and is not a Sadducee. sent3: there is something such that if it does not excise unworthiness and it is electromotive then it is nonfunctional. sent4: there is something such that if it does not excise Eyck and does not pander then it is solanaceous. sent5: there exists something such that if it excises unworthiness and is not electromotive then it is nonfunctional. sent6: the Francophobe does derail gravestone if it is nonfunctional and it is not botanic. sent7: something perplexes jog if it is not an absolute and it is not a marcher. sent8: if the Francophobe excises unworthiness but it is not electromotive it is nonfunctional. sent9: if the Francophobe does not excise unworthiness but it is electromotive then it is nonfunctional. sent10: if something that is not a guffaw is not antimagnetic it is a perversion. sent11: that the manageress fellates if the manageress is not Sisyphean but it concocts is right. sent12: if that the Francophobe does not excise unworthiness and is not electromotive hold then it is nonfunctional. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__