that there exists something such that the fact that it either is non-thalloid or enhances or both does not hold does not hold.
sent1: the scarf does not bake and is a AFL-CIO if it does not investigate pantaloon. sent2: there is something such that that it is thalloid is right. sent3: the fact that the clianthus is not a Flory and/or is public is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the riser is not doctrinal and/or does destroy is false if that the stria is not a kind of a Taxodium is right. sent5: there exists something such that that either it is thalloid or it enhances or both is false. sent6: the fact that the clianthus does not enhance is right. sent7: if the scarf is not a fatso then it does not investigate pantaloon. sent8: there is something such that it is non-thalloid and/or does enhance. sent9: something is not micropylar. sent10: something is not impressionable. sent11: there exists something such that that it does not diffuse clianthus and/or is a sock is incorrect. sent12: if something is a AFL-CIO that it does not debrief bistro or is obligatory or both is not correct. sent13: something does not debrief fieldfare. sent14: that the clianthus is not a plonk and/or it does investigate stria does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it either does not investigate Beaverbrook or does chasten or both is wrong. sent16: that the clianthus is not a baryon and/or it enhances is not correct. sent17: the fact that the clianthus does not debrief gimel and/or it is a Assyriology is false. sent18: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Hyla. sent19: that the clianthus is not a Greenville and/or it is a Chordospartium is wrong. sent20: the fact that the clianthus is not efferent or is an audiovisual or both is incorrect. sent21: that the clianthus is not thalloid and/or enhances does not hold.
sent21 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that the fact that either it is not doctrinal or it does destroy or both does not hold.
sent12 -> int1: that the fact that the scarf does not debrief bistro and/or it is obligatory does not hold is not wrong if it is a AFL-CIO.;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that the fact that it either is non-thalloid or enhances or both does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the scarf does not bake and is a AFL-CIO if it does not investigate pantaloon. sent2: there is something such that that it is thalloid is right. sent3: the fact that the clianthus is not a Flory and/or is public is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the riser is not doctrinal and/or does destroy is false if that the stria is not a kind of a Taxodium is right. sent5: there exists something such that that either it is thalloid or it enhances or both is false. sent6: the fact that the clianthus does not enhance is right. sent7: if the scarf is not a fatso then it does not investigate pantaloon. sent8: there is something such that it is non-thalloid and/or does enhance. sent9: something is not micropylar. sent10: something is not impressionable. sent11: there exists something such that that it does not diffuse clianthus and/or is a sock is incorrect. sent12: if something is a AFL-CIO that it does not debrief bistro or is obligatory or both is not correct. sent13: something does not debrief fieldfare. sent14: that the clianthus is not a plonk and/or it does investigate stria does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it either does not investigate Beaverbrook or does chasten or both is wrong. sent16: that the clianthus is not a baryon and/or it enhances is not correct. sent17: the fact that the clianthus does not debrief gimel and/or it is a Assyriology is false. sent18: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Hyla. sent19: that the clianthus is not a Greenville and/or it is a Chordospartium is wrong. sent20: the fact that the clianthus is not efferent or is an audiovisual or both is incorrect. sent21: that the clianthus is not thalloid and/or enhances does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__