the vise fibs.
sent1: the vise is a kind of a hike if the colter is a fib. sent2: the fact that the dustcloth is a eelblenny and does not clue beta-carotene is wrong. sent3: if the fact that the unicycle is not noneffervescent is not false it suspends pentaerythritol and it suspends unicycle. sent4: the slipstick notches quarrel. sent5: there is nothing that clues beta-carotene and is not non-dirty. sent6: the dustcloth is a chess if that it dirties is not incorrect. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a hike and it does clue beta-carotene is not right. sent8: if the dustcloth clues beta-carotene it is a chess. sent9: the foregrounding is radioactive. sent10: the foregrounding does clue beta-carotene. sent11: the foregrounding does not suspend pentaerythritol if the unicycle does suspend pentaerythritol and suspends unicycle. sent12: if the slipstick is not a chess that the colter is a hike but it is not a kind of a fib is wrong. sent13: the colter is a polynomial. sent14: there is something such that that it is a hike and it does dirty is not correct. sent15: if the slipstick is a eelblenny then the vise fibs. sent16: the vise is not a kind of a fib if the fact that the colter is a hike but it does not fib is not correct. sent17: the dustcloth is a eelblenny if there is something such that that it dirties and it is authorial is not true. sent18: if something does not suspend pentaerythritol it is a kind of radioactive thing that is not a kind of a tweet. sent19: the colter does hike if there exists something such that the fact that it does clue beta-carotene and it does dirty is not right. sent20: a radioactive thing that does not tweet is not a eelblenny. sent21: if the colter does hike then the slipstick is a chess. sent22: if there exists something such that the fact that it is radioactive is right then that the slipstick is authorial thing that is not a kind of a eelblenny is false. sent23: if that the unicycle is not orthopedic but it is lipless is not right then it is not noneffervescent. sent24: the colter is a hike if there exists something such that it does not clue beta-carotene. sent25: there exists something such that that it forwards and does suspend synovia is false.
sent5 -> int1: that the dustcloth clues beta-carotene and is dirty is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does clue beta-carotene and is not non-dirty does not hold.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the colter hikes.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the slipstick is a chess.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slipstick is not a kind of a eelblenny.; sent9 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not nonradioactive.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: that the slipstick is authorial but it is not a eelblenny does not hold.;
the vise does not fib.
sent20 -> int7: if the foregrounding is radioactive but it does not tweet then it is not a eelblenny.; sent18 -> int8: if the foregrounding does not suspend pentaerythritol it is radioactive and it is not a tweet.;
$hypothesis$ = the vise fibs. ; $context$ = sent1: the vise is a kind of a hike if the colter is a fib. sent2: the fact that the dustcloth is a eelblenny and does not clue beta-carotene is wrong. sent3: if the fact that the unicycle is not noneffervescent is not false it suspends pentaerythritol and it suspends unicycle. sent4: the slipstick notches quarrel. sent5: there is nothing that clues beta-carotene and is not non-dirty. sent6: the dustcloth is a chess if that it dirties is not incorrect. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a hike and it does clue beta-carotene is not right. sent8: if the dustcloth clues beta-carotene it is a chess. sent9: the foregrounding is radioactive. sent10: the foregrounding does clue beta-carotene. sent11: the foregrounding does not suspend pentaerythritol if the unicycle does suspend pentaerythritol and suspends unicycle. sent12: if the slipstick is not a chess that the colter is a hike but it is not a kind of a fib is wrong. sent13: the colter is a polynomial. sent14: there is something such that that it is a hike and it does dirty is not correct. sent15: if the slipstick is a eelblenny then the vise fibs. sent16: the vise is not a kind of a fib if the fact that the colter is a hike but it does not fib is not correct. sent17: the dustcloth is a eelblenny if there is something such that that it dirties and it is authorial is not true. sent18: if something does not suspend pentaerythritol it is a kind of radioactive thing that is not a kind of a tweet. sent19: the colter does hike if there exists something such that the fact that it does clue beta-carotene and it does dirty is not right. sent20: a radioactive thing that does not tweet is not a eelblenny. sent21: if the colter does hike then the slipstick is a chess. sent22: if there exists something such that the fact that it is radioactive is right then that the slipstick is authorial thing that is not a kind of a eelblenny is false. sent23: if that the unicycle is not orthopedic but it is lipless is not right then it is not noneffervescent. sent24: the colter is a hike if there exists something such that it does not clue beta-carotene. sent25: there exists something such that that it forwards and does suspend synovia is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that the dustcloth clues beta-carotene and is dirty is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does clue beta-carotene and is not non-dirty does not hold.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the colter hikes.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the slipstick is a chess.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slipstick is not a kind of a eelblenny.; sent9 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not nonradioactive.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: that the slipstick is authorial but it is not a eelblenny does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__