the homograft appropriates.
sent1: if the fact that the lory is bibliotics is not wrong then the homograft does appropriate. sent2: something does not subtilize wise and is not cash-and-carry. sent3: the fact that either the kiaat does not subtilize pensiveness or it is an instrument or both is not correct if the rotary is bibliotics. sent4: the lory is immunochemical. sent5: the kiaat subtilizes wise. sent6: that the rotary does subtilize pensiveness hold if something is a kind of a pasha that is not a ticktack. sent7: the lory is bibliotics if the kiaat is not an instrument. sent8: if something that is not a kind of a pasha is a kind of an instrument the kiaat is a ticktack. sent9: the titrator is not a ticktack. sent10: the kiaat is immunochemical if something does not subtilize wise and is not cash-and-carry. sent11: something does instrument. sent12: everything is a pasha and it is not a ticktack. sent13: the fact that if there exists something such that it is immunochemical and it is bibliotics then the kiaat does not instrument is right. sent14: if the kiaat is a kind of a ticktack the titrator is immunochemical. sent15: something is not appropriate if it is not immunochemical.
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the kiaat is immunochemical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kiaat is a kind of an instrument.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the kiaat is immunochemical and is an instrument.; int2 -> int3: something is immunochemical and it is a kind of an instrument.; sent12 -> int4: the titrator is a pasha but it is not a kind of a ticktack.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of a pasha and it is not a ticktack hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the rotary subtilizes pensiveness.;
the homograft is not appropriate.
sent15 -> int7: the homograft does not appropriate if it is not immunochemical.;
$hypothesis$ = the homograft appropriates. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the lory is bibliotics is not wrong then the homograft does appropriate. sent2: something does not subtilize wise and is not cash-and-carry. sent3: the fact that either the kiaat does not subtilize pensiveness or it is an instrument or both is not correct if the rotary is bibliotics. sent4: the lory is immunochemical. sent5: the kiaat subtilizes wise. sent6: that the rotary does subtilize pensiveness hold if something is a kind of a pasha that is not a ticktack. sent7: the lory is bibliotics if the kiaat is not an instrument. sent8: if something that is not a kind of a pasha is a kind of an instrument the kiaat is a ticktack. sent9: the titrator is not a ticktack. sent10: the kiaat is immunochemical if something does not subtilize wise and is not cash-and-carry. sent11: something does instrument. sent12: everything is a pasha and it is not a ticktack. sent13: the fact that if there exists something such that it is immunochemical and it is bibliotics then the kiaat does not instrument is right. sent14: if the kiaat is a kind of a ticktack the titrator is immunochemical. sent15: something is not appropriate if it is not immunochemical. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the kiaat is immunochemical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kiaat is a kind of an instrument.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the kiaat is immunochemical and is an instrument.; int2 -> int3: something is immunochemical and it is a kind of an instrument.; sent12 -> int4: the titrator is a pasha but it is not a kind of a ticktack.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of a pasha and it is not a ticktack hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the rotary subtilizes pensiveness.; __UNKNOWN__