the sighing methane does not occur.
sent1: if the sighing laryngospasm does not occur the scent occurs and the sortie happens. sent2: that the sighing laryngospasm and the sortie occurs prevents that the heartlessness occurs. sent3: the catoptricness happens or the sunning eeriness does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that the European does not occur and/or the fractionation does not occur is not correct if the sortie does not occur. sent5: if the sighing rofecoxib does not occur the Malian happens and/or the violence does not occur. sent6: the socioculturalness does not occur. sent7: the violence is prevented by that either the Malian happens or the violence does not occur or both. sent8: the sighing laryngospasm occurs if the catoptricness does not occur and/or the sunning eeriness does not occur. sent9: the cleanup does not occur if the fact that the ludo does not occur and/or the sensoriness does not occur does not hold. sent10: both the fractionation and the sighing methane occurs if the violence does not occur. sent11: the non-Europeanness leads to that both the socioculturalness and the heartlessness happens. sent12: either the catoptricness does not occur or the sunning eeriness does not occur or both. sent13: the socioculturalness happens if the heartlessness does not occur. sent14: the sighing methane does not occur if the fact that the Europeanness does not occur and/or the fractionation does not occur is incorrect.
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: the sighing laryngospasm happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sortie occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sighing laryngospasm and the sortie happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the heartlessness does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the socioculturalness happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sortie does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: that the Europeanness does not occur and/or the fractionation does not occur is not true.; int7 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
that the scent happens hold.
$hypothesis$ = the sighing methane does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sighing laryngospasm does not occur the scent occurs and the sortie happens. sent2: that the sighing laryngospasm and the sortie occurs prevents that the heartlessness occurs. sent3: the catoptricness happens or the sunning eeriness does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that the European does not occur and/or the fractionation does not occur is not correct if the sortie does not occur. sent5: if the sighing rofecoxib does not occur the Malian happens and/or the violence does not occur. sent6: the socioculturalness does not occur. sent7: the violence is prevented by that either the Malian happens or the violence does not occur or both. sent8: the sighing laryngospasm occurs if the catoptricness does not occur and/or the sunning eeriness does not occur. sent9: the cleanup does not occur if the fact that the ludo does not occur and/or the sensoriness does not occur does not hold. sent10: both the fractionation and the sighing methane occurs if the violence does not occur. sent11: the non-Europeanness leads to that both the socioculturalness and the heartlessness happens. sent12: either the catoptricness does not occur or the sunning eeriness does not occur or both. sent13: the socioculturalness happens if the heartlessness does not occur. sent14: the sighing methane does not occur if the fact that the Europeanness does not occur and/or the fractionation does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: the sighing laryngospasm happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sortie occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sighing laryngospasm and the sortie happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the heartlessness does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the socioculturalness happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sortie does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: that the Europeanness does not occur and/or the fractionation does not occur is not true.; int7 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__