the fact that if that the bombshell occurs is not wrong then the lacticness but not the maintenance happens is not correct.
sent1: the maintenance does not occur if the solemnizing nardoo occurs and the lacticness does not occur. sent2: the lacticness occurs if the bombshell happens. sent3: if the heterologousness occurs the edutainment occurs. sent4: that the solemnizing freewheeler happens is prevented by that the teasing pancreatin happens and the hazing scaffolding occurs. sent5: if both the randomization and the teasing chlorofluorocarbon occurs the bombshell occurs. sent6: if the tribute happens then the randomization happens. sent7: that the fork happens leads to that the hazing twenty-seven occurs and the shadowing does not occur. sent8: that both the randomization and the teasing chlorofluorocarbon happens yields that the bombshell does not occur. sent9: if the nudism happens then that the randomization happens is not incorrect. sent10: the lacticness happens if that the teasing chlorofluorocarbon does not occur hold. sent11: the lacticness occurs. sent12: if the teasing chlorofluorocarbon does not occur then the lacticness occurs and the maintenance does not occur. sent13: that the randomization happens and the bombshell occurs is not correct if the maintenance does not occur. sent14: the nudism happens or the tribute occurs or both. sent15: that both the solemnizing nardoo and the non-lacticness occurs is triggered by that the shadowing does not occur. sent16: if the bombshell happens the lacticness occurs and the maintenance happens. sent17: the tribute does not occur if the fact that the teasing chlorofluorocarbon and the tribute happens does not hold. sent18: the unpaidness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bombshell happens.; sent14 & sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the randomization happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the teasing chlorofluorocarbon happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the randomization happens and the teasing chlorofluorocarbon happens.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the bombshell does not occur.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the teasing chlorofluorocarbon does not occur.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the lacticness occurs and the maintenance does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the poorness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the bombshell occurs is not wrong then the lacticness but not the maintenance happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the maintenance does not occur if the solemnizing nardoo occurs and the lacticness does not occur. sent2: the lacticness occurs if the bombshell happens. sent3: if the heterologousness occurs the edutainment occurs. sent4: that the solemnizing freewheeler happens is prevented by that the teasing pancreatin happens and the hazing scaffolding occurs. sent5: if both the randomization and the teasing chlorofluorocarbon occurs the bombshell occurs. sent6: if the tribute happens then the randomization happens. sent7: that the fork happens leads to that the hazing twenty-seven occurs and the shadowing does not occur. sent8: that both the randomization and the teasing chlorofluorocarbon happens yields that the bombshell does not occur. sent9: if the nudism happens then that the randomization happens is not incorrect. sent10: the lacticness happens if that the teasing chlorofluorocarbon does not occur hold. sent11: the lacticness occurs. sent12: if the teasing chlorofluorocarbon does not occur then the lacticness occurs and the maintenance does not occur. sent13: that the randomization happens and the bombshell occurs is not correct if the maintenance does not occur. sent14: the nudism happens or the tribute occurs or both. sent15: that both the solemnizing nardoo and the non-lacticness occurs is triggered by that the shadowing does not occur. sent16: if the bombshell happens the lacticness occurs and the maintenance happens. sent17: the tribute does not occur if the fact that the teasing chlorofluorocarbon and the tribute happens does not hold. sent18: the unpaidness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bombshell happens.; sent14 & sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the randomization happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the teasing chlorofluorocarbon happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the randomization happens and the teasing chlorofluorocarbon happens.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the bombshell does not occur.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the teasing chlorofluorocarbon does not occur.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the lacticness occurs and the maintenance does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__