the goingness happens.
sent1: the fact that the boast happens is false if that the urging and the stearicness happens does not hold. sent2: the epidemic happens and the arbitration occurs. sent3: if the boast does not occur but the Angolanness happens then the going does not occur. sent4: the fact that that both the urging and the stearicness occurs is not wrong is false. sent5: the Angolanness and the radiography happens. sent6: the boast does not occur if the urging does not occur. sent7: that the radiography occurs is not incorrect.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the boasting does not occur.; sent5 -> int2: the Angolan occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the boast does not occur but the Angolan occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the goingness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the boast happens is false if that the urging and the stearicness happens does not hold. sent2: the epidemic happens and the arbitration occurs. sent3: if the boast does not occur but the Angolanness happens then the going does not occur. sent4: the fact that that both the urging and the stearicness occurs is not wrong is false. sent5: the Angolanness and the radiography happens. sent6: the boast does not occur if the urging does not occur. sent7: that the radiography occurs is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the boasting does not occur.; sent5 -> int2: the Angolan occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the boast does not occur but the Angolan occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__