the here does not rear dj and/or it is a truck.
sent1: the here rears dj and/or it trucks. sent2: The Lanthanotidae does rear undershrub. sent3: something that does not rear dj and trucks is not an ade. sent4: the here does not rear dj if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nelson and it is an ade is false. sent5: if the undershrub rears Lanthanotidae then the fact that that it is not a minister and is not a undercharge is correct is wrong. sent6: if something that is not a nelson is an ade that it is not a kind of a undercharge is not incorrect. sent7: the undershrub does rear dj and/or it is a kind of a nelson. sent8: the crochet does not rear Lanthanotidae and rears shelduck if it is anacoluthic. sent9: that the undershrub is a nelson and an ade does not hold. sent10: the fact that something is not a kind of a waterfall and is not a undercharge is not correct if it is a crackle. sent11: something is a kind of a undercharge if that it is not a minister and it is not a kind of a undercharge does not hold. sent12: that something does not rear dj and/or is a truck is not true if it does not undercharge. sent13: the fact that the here does not rear dj and/or is a truck is wrong if the crochet is not a undercharge. sent14: something does not undercharge if it is a minister. sent15: there is something such that that it is a nelson and it is an ade does not hold. sent16: the here creates and/or is an ade. sent17: something is not a nelson and is an ade. sent18: the here does not rear dj if there is something such that it is a nelson. sent19: a minister does not rear Lanthanotidae or is not a undercharge or both. sent20: the undershrub is not a nelson. sent21: if that something is a kind of a nelson that is an ade is not wrong it is not a undercharge. sent22: if the undershrub is a nelson that is an ade it is not a kind of a undercharge. sent23: if the crochet does not rear Lanthanotidae but it does rear shelduck then the undershrub does not rear shelduck. sent24: the undershrub does rear Lanthanotidae.
sent6 -> int1: if the undershrub is not a nelson and is a kind of an ade then the fact that it is not a kind of a undercharge hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undershrub is not a nelson but it is an ade.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the undershrub does not undercharge is not wrong.; sent11 -> int3: the undershrub does undercharge if the fact that it does not minister and it is not a undercharge is not right.; sent5 & sent24 -> int4: the fact that the undershrub is both not a minister and not a undercharge is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the undershrub is a undercharge.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that that the undershrub is not a kind of a nelson but it is a kind of an ade is not right is true.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nelson and it is an ade is not right.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the here does not rear dj.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the here does not rear dj or it trucks or both is false.
sent19 -> int10: the router does not rear Lanthanotidae and/or it does not undercharge if it is a minister.;
$hypothesis$ = the here does not rear dj and/or it is a truck. ; $context$ = sent1: the here rears dj and/or it trucks. sent2: The Lanthanotidae does rear undershrub. sent3: something that does not rear dj and trucks is not an ade. sent4: the here does not rear dj if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nelson and it is an ade is false. sent5: if the undershrub rears Lanthanotidae then the fact that that it is not a minister and is not a undercharge is correct is wrong. sent6: if something that is not a nelson is an ade that it is not a kind of a undercharge is not incorrect. sent7: the undershrub does rear dj and/or it is a kind of a nelson. sent8: the crochet does not rear Lanthanotidae and rears shelduck if it is anacoluthic. sent9: that the undershrub is a nelson and an ade does not hold. sent10: the fact that something is not a kind of a waterfall and is not a undercharge is not correct if it is a crackle. sent11: something is a kind of a undercharge if that it is not a minister and it is not a kind of a undercharge does not hold. sent12: that something does not rear dj and/or is a truck is not true if it does not undercharge. sent13: the fact that the here does not rear dj and/or is a truck is wrong if the crochet is not a undercharge. sent14: something does not undercharge if it is a minister. sent15: there is something such that that it is a nelson and it is an ade does not hold. sent16: the here creates and/or is an ade. sent17: something is not a nelson and is an ade. sent18: the here does not rear dj if there is something such that it is a nelson. sent19: a minister does not rear Lanthanotidae or is not a undercharge or both. sent20: the undershrub is not a nelson. sent21: if that something is a kind of a nelson that is an ade is not wrong it is not a undercharge. sent22: if the undershrub is a nelson that is an ade it is not a kind of a undercharge. sent23: if the crochet does not rear Lanthanotidae but it does rear shelduck then the undershrub does not rear shelduck. sent24: the undershrub does rear Lanthanotidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the undershrub is not a nelson and is a kind of an ade then the fact that it is not a kind of a undercharge hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undershrub is not a nelson but it is an ade.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the undershrub does not undercharge is not wrong.; sent11 -> int3: the undershrub does undercharge if the fact that it does not minister and it is not a undercharge is not right.; sent5 & sent24 -> int4: the fact that the undershrub is both not a minister and not a undercharge is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the undershrub is a undercharge.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that that the undershrub is not a kind of a nelson but it is a kind of an ade is not right is true.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nelson and it is an ade is not right.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the here does not rear dj.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__