the fact that not the calisthenicness but the impinging probe happens is not true.
sent1: the lift does not occur if not the perusing flat but the Byzantineness occurs. sent2: the perusing flat does not occur if the fact that either the lift does not occur or the Byzantine happens or both is not right. sent3: that both the perusing flat and the Byzantineness occurs yields that the lifting does not occur. sent4: if the dogtrot does not occur then not the perusing flat but the Byzantineness occurs. sent5: if both the impinging birdlime and the vacuuming bitumastic happens the fact that the dogtrot does not occur hold. sent6: that not the impinging birdlime but the calisthenicness occurs prevents that the briefing histocompatibility happens. sent7: if the impinging probe does not occur the fact that the lifting does not occur and/or the Byzantine happens does not hold. sent8: the perusing flat does not occur. sent9: that the impinging birdlime happens is triggered by that the calisthenicness occurs. sent10: the vacuuming bitumastic occurs. sent11: the perusing flat does not occur if the dogtrot does not occur. sent12: the lift happens. sent13: the impinging probe happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calisthenicness happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the impinging birdlime occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: both the impinging birdlime and the vacuuming bitumastic happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the dogtrot does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: not the perusing flat but the Byzantine occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the lifting does not occur.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the calisthenicness does not occur.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the briefing histocompatibility does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the calisthenicness but the impinging probe happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the lift does not occur if not the perusing flat but the Byzantineness occurs. sent2: the perusing flat does not occur if the fact that either the lift does not occur or the Byzantine happens or both is not right. sent3: that both the perusing flat and the Byzantineness occurs yields that the lifting does not occur. sent4: if the dogtrot does not occur then not the perusing flat but the Byzantineness occurs. sent5: if both the impinging birdlime and the vacuuming bitumastic happens the fact that the dogtrot does not occur hold. sent6: that not the impinging birdlime but the calisthenicness occurs prevents that the briefing histocompatibility happens. sent7: if the impinging probe does not occur the fact that the lifting does not occur and/or the Byzantine happens does not hold. sent8: the perusing flat does not occur. sent9: that the impinging birdlime happens is triggered by that the calisthenicness occurs. sent10: the vacuuming bitumastic occurs. sent11: the perusing flat does not occur if the dogtrot does not occur. sent12: the lift happens. sent13: the impinging probe happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calisthenicness happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the impinging birdlime occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: both the impinging birdlime and the vacuuming bitumastic happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the dogtrot does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: not the perusing flat but the Byzantine occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the lifting does not occur.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the calisthenicness does not occur.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__