the lipase is gluttonous thing that does not intensify worthy.
sent1: if the petrifaction hydroplanes then that the storyteller intensifies langley and is not a terbium is false. sent2: the petrifaction does hydroplane. sent3: something is a tattle but it does not prey Moulmein if the fact that it does not hydroplane is not false. sent4: if something does not ratchet capillarity the fact that it is a parapet and it is uncousinly is incorrect. sent5: if that the name is not a gynecologist or it does not bundle or both is wrong then the clericalist does not ratchet capillarity. sent6: the SEAL is not a citation if the partner does not prey Merlot and is a citation. sent7: if the partner does scroll it does not prey Merlot and is a citation. sent8: the fact that either the name is not a kind of a gynecologist or it does not bundle or both is incorrect if the fanny is a wrench. sent9: if something does not hydroplane then that it is not non-gluttonous and it does not intensify worthy is false. sent10: the storyteller is not a monetization if that the clericalist is a kind of a parapet and it is uncousinly is not true. sent11: if the armor is not a silversword and not even then the fanny wrenches. sent12: if the clericalist is not uncousinly that the fact that the lipase is not a kind of a bundling and it is not uncousinly hold does not hold. sent13: the fact that the lipase is a kind of a bundling but it is not uncousinly is false if the clericalist is not uncousinly. sent14: if something intensifies Amsterdam it is a Sokoro. sent15: the fact that the petrifaction hydroplanes and does begrudge is incorrect if the storyteller is not a monetization. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a parapet and it ratchets capillarity does not hold. sent17: if there is something such that it does not intensify langley the fact that the clericalist is not a monetization hold. sent18: that the clericalist does not begrudge but it is a parapet does not hold if it is not a monetization. sent19: the lipase is not non-gluttonous. sent20: that the clericalist begrudges and is a parapet is not right. sent21: if that the lipase does not ratchet capillarity is true then it is gluttonous and does not intensify worthy. sent22: the clericalist is not uncousinly if that it does not begrudge and it is a parapet does not hold. sent23: that the SEAL is a kind of a self-determination that is not a phone does not hold if it is not a citation. sent24: if that the lipase is not a bundling but cousinly does not hold it does not ratchet capillarity. sent25: if that something is a self-determination and not a phone is not right then it does intensify Amsterdam. sent26: the armor is not a kind of a silversword and it is not even if the fact that the SEAL is a Sokoro is not false.
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the storyteller does intensify langley but it is not a kind of a terbium is not correct is right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it intensifies langley and is not a terbium is incorrect.;
the fact that the lipase is a kind of gluttonous thing that does not intensify worthy does not hold.
sent9 -> int3: if the lipase does not hydroplane then that it is gluttonous thing that does not intensify worthy is not right.; sent4 -> int4: that the clericalist is a parapet and it is uncousinly is wrong if it does not ratchet capillarity.; sent14 -> int5: the SEAL is a Sokoro if it does intensify Amsterdam.; sent25 -> int6: the fact that the SEAL intensifies Amsterdam is correct if the fact that it is a self-determination and it is not a phone does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the lipase is gluttonous thing that does not intensify worthy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the petrifaction hydroplanes then that the storyteller intensifies langley and is not a terbium is false. sent2: the petrifaction does hydroplane. sent3: something is a tattle but it does not prey Moulmein if the fact that it does not hydroplane is not false. sent4: if something does not ratchet capillarity the fact that it is a parapet and it is uncousinly is incorrect. sent5: if that the name is not a gynecologist or it does not bundle or both is wrong then the clericalist does not ratchet capillarity. sent6: the SEAL is not a citation if the partner does not prey Merlot and is a citation. sent7: if the partner does scroll it does not prey Merlot and is a citation. sent8: the fact that either the name is not a kind of a gynecologist or it does not bundle or both is incorrect if the fanny is a wrench. sent9: if something does not hydroplane then that it is not non-gluttonous and it does not intensify worthy is false. sent10: the storyteller is not a monetization if that the clericalist is a kind of a parapet and it is uncousinly is not true. sent11: if the armor is not a silversword and not even then the fanny wrenches. sent12: if the clericalist is not uncousinly that the fact that the lipase is not a kind of a bundling and it is not uncousinly hold does not hold. sent13: the fact that the lipase is a kind of a bundling but it is not uncousinly is false if the clericalist is not uncousinly. sent14: if something intensifies Amsterdam it is a Sokoro. sent15: the fact that the petrifaction hydroplanes and does begrudge is incorrect if the storyteller is not a monetization. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a parapet and it ratchets capillarity does not hold. sent17: if there is something such that it does not intensify langley the fact that the clericalist is not a monetization hold. sent18: that the clericalist does not begrudge but it is a parapet does not hold if it is not a monetization. sent19: the lipase is not non-gluttonous. sent20: that the clericalist begrudges and is a parapet is not right. sent21: if that the lipase does not ratchet capillarity is true then it is gluttonous and does not intensify worthy. sent22: the clericalist is not uncousinly if that it does not begrudge and it is a parapet does not hold. sent23: that the SEAL is a kind of a self-determination that is not a phone does not hold if it is not a citation. sent24: if that the lipase is not a bundling but cousinly does not hold it does not ratchet capillarity. sent25: if that something is a self-determination and not a phone is not right then it does intensify Amsterdam. sent26: the armor is not a kind of a silversword and it is not even if the fact that the SEAL is a Sokoro is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the storyteller does intensify langley but it is not a kind of a terbium is not correct is right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it intensifies langley and is not a terbium is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__