there is something such that if that it is not a wrench and is a kind of a masculinization is not right then it is embolic.
sent1: the flunky powwows Cassius if that it is both not a wrench and an upset does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does not wrench and is a masculinization it is embolic. sent3: something is embolic if it is not a kind of a wrench and is a masculinization. sent4: something that is not a masculinization is embolic. sent5: the flunky is embolic if the fact that it is a wrench and it is a kind of a masculinization does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a wrench and is a kind of a masculinization is wrong then it is embolic. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is not a masculinization is true it is embolic. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not scar and upsets it does resort. sent9: the flunky is embolic if it is both not a wrench and a masculinization. sent10: if that something does not wrench but it is a kind of a masculinization does not hold then it is embolic. sent11: something powwows death if the fact that it is not a short and it is a odist is not right. sent12: if that something is not a kind of a phenomenology but it is Beethovenian is not right it powwows Cassius. sent13: if the fact that something is a wrench and is a masculinization does not hold then it is embolic. sent14: the flunky is embolic if it is not a masculinization. sent15: the e is a Mauriac if it does not powwow flunky.
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that that the flunky does not wrench but it is a masculinization does not hold is true it is embolic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the overmantel powwows Cassius if that it is not a kind of a phenomenology and it is not non-Beethovenian is not right.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not a wrench and is a kind of a masculinization is not right then it is embolic. ; $context$ = sent1: the flunky powwows Cassius if that it is both not a wrench and an upset does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does not wrench and is a masculinization it is embolic. sent3: something is embolic if it is not a kind of a wrench and is a masculinization. sent4: something that is not a masculinization is embolic. sent5: the flunky is embolic if the fact that it is a wrench and it is a kind of a masculinization does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a wrench and is a kind of a masculinization is wrong then it is embolic. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is not a masculinization is true it is embolic. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not scar and upsets it does resort. sent9: the flunky is embolic if it is both not a wrench and a masculinization. sent10: if that something does not wrench but it is a kind of a masculinization does not hold then it is embolic. sent11: something powwows death if the fact that it is not a short and it is a odist is not right. sent12: if that something is not a kind of a phenomenology but it is Beethovenian is not right it powwows Cassius. sent13: if the fact that something is a wrench and is a masculinization does not hold then it is embolic. sent14: the flunky is embolic if it is not a masculinization. sent15: the e is a Mauriac if it does not powwow flunky. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that that the flunky does not wrench but it is a masculinization does not hold is true it is embolic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__