the fact that the tweeter does not kidnap sereness and kidnaps defoliant is not true.
sent1: the fact that the xeranthemum is a kind of a Sister and is not a kind of a Confucius is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a chilliness. sent2: the fact that the tweeter kidnaps sereness and does kidnap defoliant does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the xeranthemum is a Sister but it is not a kind of a Confucius is false the tweeter is not a Tartu. sent4: if the tweeter is a kind of a Cronartium it does individuate proposer and/or it does not individuate thecodont. sent5: the tweeter is not a Tartu if the xeranthemum is a kind of a Confucius. sent6: the xeranthemum is common if there exists something such that the fact that it is a things and/or it is not a kind of a happiness is false. sent7: something is a chilliness. sent8: something is not a Tartu or it is not a Confucius or both if the fact that it is not uncommon is not wrong. sent9: the tweeter is a Cronartium. sent10: the fact that something is a things and/or it is not a happiness is false if it is not accordant. sent11: that the tweeter kidnaps sereness and kidnaps defoliant is wrong if it is not a Tartu. sent12: there is something such that it is impatient. sent13: the fact that something does not kidnap sereness and does kidnap defoliant does not hold if it is not a Tartu. sent14: something is not a Sister if it does individuate proposer and/or does not individuate thecodont. sent15: something that is either not a Sister or a chilliness or both does not kidnap sereness. sent16: everything is not accordant. sent17: if the xeranthemum is not a Tartu then the tweeter does kidnap defoliant.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the xeranthemum is a kind of a Sister and is not a Confucius does not hold hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the tweeter is not a Tartu hold.; sent13 -> int3: if the tweeter is not a Tartu that it does not kidnap sereness and does kidnap defoliant is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the tweeter does not kidnap sereness and does kidnap defoliant.
sent15 -> int4: the fact that the tweeter does not kidnap sereness is not wrong if it is not a Sister or is a chilliness or both.; sent14 -> int5: if the tweeter individuates proposer or it does not individuate thecodont or both then it is not a kind of a Sister.; sent4 & sent9 -> int6: the tweeter does individuate proposer or it does not individuate thecodont or both.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the tweeter is not a kind of a Sister.; int7 -> int8: the tweeter is not a Sister or it is a chilliness or both.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the tweeter does not kidnap sereness.; sent10 -> int10: the fact that the proposer is a kind of a things and/or it is not a happiness is false if it is not accordant.; sent16 -> int11: the proposer is not accordant.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the fact that either the proposer is a things or it is not a kind of a happiness or both is not correct hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists nothing such that it is a things and/or it is not a happiness.; int13 -> int14: that the fact that the lender is a things and/or is not a kind of a happiness is not right hold.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it is a things and/or not a happiness does not hold.; sent6 & int15 -> int16: the xeranthemum is not uncommon.; sent8 -> int17: the xeranthemum is not a Tartu or it is not a Confucius or both if it is common.; int16 & int17 -> int18: the xeranthemum is not a Tartu and/or it is not a kind of a Confucius.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tweeter does not kidnap sereness and kidnaps defoliant is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the xeranthemum is a kind of a Sister and is not a kind of a Confucius is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a chilliness. sent2: the fact that the tweeter kidnaps sereness and does kidnap defoliant does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the xeranthemum is a Sister but it is not a kind of a Confucius is false the tweeter is not a Tartu. sent4: if the tweeter is a kind of a Cronartium it does individuate proposer and/or it does not individuate thecodont. sent5: the tweeter is not a Tartu if the xeranthemum is a kind of a Confucius. sent6: the xeranthemum is common if there exists something such that the fact that it is a things and/or it is not a kind of a happiness is false. sent7: something is a chilliness. sent8: something is not a Tartu or it is not a Confucius or both if the fact that it is not uncommon is not wrong. sent9: the tweeter is a Cronartium. sent10: the fact that something is a things and/or it is not a happiness is false if it is not accordant. sent11: that the tweeter kidnaps sereness and kidnaps defoliant is wrong if it is not a Tartu. sent12: there is something such that it is impatient. sent13: the fact that something does not kidnap sereness and does kidnap defoliant does not hold if it is not a Tartu. sent14: something is not a Sister if it does individuate proposer and/or does not individuate thecodont. sent15: something that is either not a Sister or a chilliness or both does not kidnap sereness. sent16: everything is not accordant. sent17: if the xeranthemum is not a Tartu then the tweeter does kidnap defoliant. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the xeranthemum is a kind of a Sister and is not a Confucius does not hold hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the tweeter is not a Tartu hold.; sent13 -> int3: if the tweeter is not a Tartu that it does not kidnap sereness and does kidnap defoliant is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__