that the cacodylicness happens causes either that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur or that the acquisition does not occur or both.
sent1: the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or the acquisition happens. sent2: the pyroligneousness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or the acquisition does not occur does not hold is not wrong the cacodylicness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that either the abdicating sapodilla does not occur or the acquisition does not occur or both is incorrect the cacodylicness happens. sent5: that the abdicating amitriptyline does not occur and/or the explanation does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the cacodylicness does not occur and the retaking does not occur if the competition does not occur. sent7: the cacodylicness does not occur if that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or the acquisition happens does not hold. sent8: that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or that the acquisition occurs is brought about by the cacodylicness. sent9: the jack-o'-lantern does not occur and/or the Catalan does not occur. sent10: that the competition does not occur is right if the fact that the alularness happens and the carbocyclicness occurs is not correct. sent11: the fact that the acquisition happens is not wrong. sent12: if the recombining Nero happens then either the comedown does not occur or the jack-o'-lantern does not occur or both. sent13: that either the tweedling flirt does not occur or the arson does not occur or both is wrong. sent14: if the cacodylicness happens then the abdicating sapodilla happens or the acquisition does not occur or both. sent15: if the cacodylicness does not occur and the retaking does not occur then the nonunionness does not occur. sent16: the letting occurs. sent17: if the chicken happens then the iridectomy does not occur and/or the tweedling pardoner does not occur. sent18: the spluttering oligopoly does not occur if that either the nomination does not occur or the purposefulness does not occur or both is not right. sent19: that either the abdicating sapodilla does not occur or the acquisition does not occur or both prevents that the cacodylicness happens. sent20: if the fact that the abdicating sapodilla occurs or the acquisition does not occur or both is not right then the cacodylicness does not occur. sent21: the carbocyclicness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or the acquisition does not occur is not true.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the cacodylicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cacodylicness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the abdicating sapodilla does not occur or the acquisition does not occur or both.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the nonunionness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the cacodylicness happens causes either that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur or that the acquisition does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or the acquisition happens. sent2: the pyroligneousness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or the acquisition does not occur does not hold is not wrong the cacodylicness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that either the abdicating sapodilla does not occur or the acquisition does not occur or both is incorrect the cacodylicness happens. sent5: that the abdicating amitriptyline does not occur and/or the explanation does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the cacodylicness does not occur and the retaking does not occur if the competition does not occur. sent7: the cacodylicness does not occur if that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or the acquisition happens does not hold. sent8: that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or that the acquisition occurs is brought about by the cacodylicness. sent9: the jack-o'-lantern does not occur and/or the Catalan does not occur. sent10: that the competition does not occur is right if the fact that the alularness happens and the carbocyclicness occurs is not correct. sent11: the fact that the acquisition happens is not wrong. sent12: if the recombining Nero happens then either the comedown does not occur or the jack-o'-lantern does not occur or both. sent13: that either the tweedling flirt does not occur or the arson does not occur or both is wrong. sent14: if the cacodylicness happens then the abdicating sapodilla happens or the acquisition does not occur or both. sent15: if the cacodylicness does not occur and the retaking does not occur then the nonunionness does not occur. sent16: the letting occurs. sent17: if the chicken happens then the iridectomy does not occur and/or the tweedling pardoner does not occur. sent18: the spluttering oligopoly does not occur if that either the nomination does not occur or the purposefulness does not occur or both is not right. sent19: that either the abdicating sapodilla does not occur or the acquisition does not occur or both prevents that the cacodylicness happens. sent20: if the fact that the abdicating sapodilla occurs or the acquisition does not occur or both is not right then the cacodylicness does not occur. sent21: the carbocyclicness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the abdicating sapodilla does not occur and/or the acquisition does not occur is not true.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the cacodylicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cacodylicness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the abdicating sapodilla does not occur or the acquisition does not occur or both.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__