the crouton does not splat molestation.
sent1: something is meritocratic and it is a kind of a past if it is not a highbinder. sent2: the CEO is meritocratic. sent3: the crouton is not a highbinder. sent4: the valency is not nonreciprocal if the Lie is not an archery and not cybernetic. sent5: if the fact that the valency is not nonreciprocal is true then that the Permalloy is both not a specimen and not a cleistothecium does not hold. sent6: the CEO does not restore and it is not a strafe if it is meritocratic. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is not a specimen and is not a cleistothecium is not true then the anchor is not interior. sent8: the anchor splats cut-in and is interior if the CEO is not a strafe. sent9: if the crouton does splat molestation the machilid does splat molestation. sent10: the Lie is not an archery and it is non-cybernetic if the crouton does not splat molestation. sent11: there is something such that that it does not splat cut-in and is not interior is incorrect. sent12: if the crouton is meritocratic and does not restore it is not a strafe. sent13: the crouton splats cut-in and it is interior if it does not strafe. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a specimen and a cleistothecium is not correct. sent15: if that the crouton is a cleistothecium is not wrong then the machilid does splat molestation. sent16: the fact that the CEO is cybernetic and not meritocratic does not hold if the crouton does not splat molestation. sent17: if something is not nonreciprocal it does splat molestation and/or is a cleistothecium. sent18: if something is interior then it is not nonreciprocal and not a specimen.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crouton does not splat molestation.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Lie is not an archery and not cybernetic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the valency is not nonreciprocal.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the Permalloy is not a specimen and it is not a cleistothecium does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a specimen and it is not a kind of a cleistothecium is not correct.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the anchor is not interior.; sent6 & sent2 -> int6: the CEO does not restore and it does not strafe.; int6 -> int7: the CEO is not a strafe.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the anchor splats cut-in and is interior.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the anchor is interior is correct.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the machilid does splat molestation.
sent17 -> int11: if the crouton is not nonreciprocal then the fact that either it splats molestation or it is a cleistothecium or both is true.; sent18 -> int12: the fact that the crouton is a kind of reciprocal thing that is not a kind of the specimen if the crouton is interior is not false.; sent1 -> int13: the crouton is meritocratic and it is a past if it is not a kind of a highbinder.; int13 & sent3 -> int14: the crouton is meritocratic and is a past.; int14 -> int15: the crouton is meritocratic.;
$hypothesis$ = the crouton does not splat molestation. ; $context$ = sent1: something is meritocratic and it is a kind of a past if it is not a highbinder. sent2: the CEO is meritocratic. sent3: the crouton is not a highbinder. sent4: the valency is not nonreciprocal if the Lie is not an archery and not cybernetic. sent5: if the fact that the valency is not nonreciprocal is true then that the Permalloy is both not a specimen and not a cleistothecium does not hold. sent6: the CEO does not restore and it is not a strafe if it is meritocratic. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is not a specimen and is not a cleistothecium is not true then the anchor is not interior. sent8: the anchor splats cut-in and is interior if the CEO is not a strafe. sent9: if the crouton does splat molestation the machilid does splat molestation. sent10: the Lie is not an archery and it is non-cybernetic if the crouton does not splat molestation. sent11: there is something such that that it does not splat cut-in and is not interior is incorrect. sent12: if the crouton is meritocratic and does not restore it is not a strafe. sent13: the crouton splats cut-in and it is interior if it does not strafe. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a specimen and a cleistothecium is not correct. sent15: if that the crouton is a cleistothecium is not wrong then the machilid does splat molestation. sent16: the fact that the CEO is cybernetic and not meritocratic does not hold if the crouton does not splat molestation. sent17: if something is not nonreciprocal it does splat molestation and/or is a cleistothecium. sent18: if something is interior then it is not nonreciprocal and not a specimen. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crouton does not splat molestation.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Lie is not an archery and not cybernetic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the valency is not nonreciprocal.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the Permalloy is not a specimen and it is not a cleistothecium does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a specimen and it is not a kind of a cleistothecium is not correct.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the anchor is not interior.; sent6 & sent2 -> int6: the CEO does not restore and it does not strafe.; int6 -> int7: the CEO is not a strafe.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the anchor splats cut-in and is interior.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the anchor is interior is correct.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__