the Chimakum is not non-uniform.
sent1: the fact that the precinct does secrete guardsman but it is not a neurasthenic is not correct if something is non-bacteriolytic. sent2: the fact that the placket crumbles affluence is not false if it does uniform. sent3: something that does crumble carrel is neurasthenic. sent4: if there is something such that it is a polytonality then the imbrication does not tweeze doom. sent5: the Chimakum is uniform if the palanquin does crumble carrel. sent6: if the tragopan is not impermeable it is hot and it is a polytonality. sent7: the glassblower is not elegiac. sent8: the peacock-throne is not bacteriolytic if the imbrication is bacteriolytic thing that does not company bristle. sent9: The guardsman does secrete Chimakum. sent10: that the Chimakum is a kind of a absentmindedness is true if it is celiac. sent11: if something is a kind of a harvestman then it is not a dam. sent12: if that the croupier is not a kind of a kiddy and/or it is impermeable is incorrect then the tragopan is not impermeable. sent13: the precinct is not a polytonality if the peacock-throne is not non-hot and is not a kind of a polytonality. sent14: the Chimakum does not wet. sent15: if the precinct is not a kind of a polytonality it either tweezes doom or does not company bristle or both. sent16: the fact that the croupier is not a kiddy and/or is impermeable is wrong if something is not elegiac. sent17: the fact that the peacock-throne is hot and is not a polytonality is not incorrect if the fact that it is impermeable is correct. sent18: the nose is not a kind of a quietist if it crumbles carrel. sent19: something that does uniform is not a neurasthenic. sent20: the fact that the grebe does not crumble carrel is right if the palanquin does secrete guardsman and is bacteriolytic. sent21: something is bacteriolytic but it does not company bristle if it does not tweeze doom. sent22: the Chimakum crumbles carrel if it does secrete guardsman. sent23: the Chimakum does secrete guardsman. sent24: the Chimakum is a Guinean.
sent19 -> int1: if the Chimakum does uniform it is not a neurasthenic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Chimakum uniforms.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Chimakum is not neurasthenic is correct.; sent3 -> int3: the Chimakum is a neurasthenic if it does crumble carrel.; sent22 & sent23 -> int4: the Chimakum crumbles carrel.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Chimakum is a neurasthenic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the grebe is a neurasthenic.
$hypothesis$ = the Chimakum is not non-uniform. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the precinct does secrete guardsman but it is not a neurasthenic is not correct if something is non-bacteriolytic. sent2: the fact that the placket crumbles affluence is not false if it does uniform. sent3: something that does crumble carrel is neurasthenic. sent4: if there is something such that it is a polytonality then the imbrication does not tweeze doom. sent5: the Chimakum is uniform if the palanquin does crumble carrel. sent6: if the tragopan is not impermeable it is hot and it is a polytonality. sent7: the glassblower is not elegiac. sent8: the peacock-throne is not bacteriolytic if the imbrication is bacteriolytic thing that does not company bristle. sent9: The guardsman does secrete Chimakum. sent10: that the Chimakum is a kind of a absentmindedness is true if it is celiac. sent11: if something is a kind of a harvestman then it is not a dam. sent12: if that the croupier is not a kind of a kiddy and/or it is impermeable is incorrect then the tragopan is not impermeable. sent13: the precinct is not a polytonality if the peacock-throne is not non-hot and is not a kind of a polytonality. sent14: the Chimakum does not wet. sent15: if the precinct is not a kind of a polytonality it either tweezes doom or does not company bristle or both. sent16: the fact that the croupier is not a kiddy and/or is impermeable is wrong if something is not elegiac. sent17: the fact that the peacock-throne is hot and is not a polytonality is not incorrect if the fact that it is impermeable is correct. sent18: the nose is not a kind of a quietist if it crumbles carrel. sent19: something that does uniform is not a neurasthenic. sent20: the fact that the grebe does not crumble carrel is right if the palanquin does secrete guardsman and is bacteriolytic. sent21: something is bacteriolytic but it does not company bristle if it does not tweeze doom. sent22: the Chimakum crumbles carrel if it does secrete guardsman. sent23: the Chimakum does secrete guardsman. sent24: the Chimakum is a Guinean. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: if the Chimakum does uniform it is not a neurasthenic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Chimakum uniforms.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Chimakum is not neurasthenic is correct.; sent3 -> int3: the Chimakum is a neurasthenic if it does crumble carrel.; sent22 & sent23 -> int4: the Chimakum crumbles carrel.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Chimakum is a neurasthenic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__