the DC or the fowling subcontractor or both happens.
sent1: that the fowling surgeonfish does not occur is brought about by that the stray happens and the allopathicness happens. sent2: the gutturalness does not occur and the depletion does not occur if the allopathicness does not occur. sent3: that the gutturalness does not occur and the depletion does not occur prevents that the DC does not occur. sent4: the concerting happens. sent5: the straying happens if the unservileness happens. sent6: if the Boeotianness happens then the stray occurs. sent7: that the unservileness and/or the Boeotianness occurs is not incorrect. sent8: if the pigmenting soup does not occur both the fowling surgeonfish and the harassment happens. sent9: the pigmenting soup does not occur and the economicness does not occur.
sent7 & sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the stray happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allopathicness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the straying and the allopathicness occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the fowling surgeonfish does not occur hold.; sent9 -> int4: the pigmenting soup does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the fowling surgeonfish occurs and the harassment happens.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the fowling surgeonfish happens is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the allopathicness does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the guttural does not occur and the depletion does not occur.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the DC happens.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the DC or the fowling subcontractor or both happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fowling surgeonfish does not occur is brought about by that the stray happens and the allopathicness happens. sent2: the gutturalness does not occur and the depletion does not occur if the allopathicness does not occur. sent3: that the gutturalness does not occur and the depletion does not occur prevents that the DC does not occur. sent4: the concerting happens. sent5: the straying happens if the unservileness happens. sent6: if the Boeotianness happens then the stray occurs. sent7: that the unservileness and/or the Boeotianness occurs is not incorrect. sent8: if the pigmenting soup does not occur both the fowling surgeonfish and the harassment happens. sent9: the pigmenting soup does not occur and the economicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the stray happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allopathicness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the straying and the allopathicness occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the fowling surgeonfish does not occur hold.; sent9 -> int4: the pigmenting soup does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the fowling surgeonfish occurs and the harassment happens.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the fowling surgeonfish happens is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the allopathicness does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the guttural does not occur and the depletion does not occur.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the DC happens.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__