the graffito is not a beastliness.
sent1: the angiogram is indecisive. sent2: something is not a leaven if it is not non-interior. sent3: if the dolphinfish is not a Sango then the graffito is not interior but it is a leaven. sent4: the angiogram is not a beastliness if the graffito is indecisive and it is a kind of a bey. sent5: the Arabist is either interior or a jumping or both. sent6: the dolphinfish is exculpatory. sent7: the dolphinfish is a kind of a bey if it corresponds reincarnationism. sent8: the angiogram is interior if the State is interior. sent9: The reincarnationism does correspond dolphinfish. sent10: the graffito is a beastliness if the dolphinfish is not a kind of a bey and/or it is not a kind of a beastliness. sent11: the dolphinfish does correspond reincarnationism. sent12: the dolphinfish is not a leaven. sent13: the fact that the Siberian is exculpatory is incorrect if the dolphinfish is a bey and it is a Sango. sent14: the angiogram is a Sango if it is not decisive. sent15: if something is not a kind of a leaven that it is not a Sango and it is indecisive is wrong. sent16: either something is not a bey or it is not a beastliness or both if it does not correspond reincarnationism. sent17: if that the angiogram is not a Sango but it is indecisive is not right then the Siberian is a Sango. sent18: the fact that something corresponds reincarnationism and is not exculpatory does not hold if it is a Sango. sent19: the fact that if the graffito is non-interior thing that is the leaven the graffito is not a beastliness is right.
sent7 & sent11 -> int1: the dolphinfish is a bey.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dolphinfish is a Sango.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dolphinfish is a bey and it is a Sango.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the Siberian is not exculpatory.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not exculpatory.;
the graffito is a kind of a beastliness.
sent16 -> int5: if the dolphinfish does not correspond reincarnationism it is not a bey and/or it is not a kind of a beastliness.; sent18 -> int6: that the Siberian does correspond reincarnationism and is non-exculpatory does not hold if it is a Sango.; sent15 -> int7: if the angiogram is not a kind of a leaven then that it is not a Sango but indecisive is incorrect.; sent2 -> int8: that the angiogram is not a leaven is true if it is interior.;
$hypothesis$ = the graffito is not a beastliness. ; $context$ = sent1: the angiogram is indecisive. sent2: something is not a leaven if it is not non-interior. sent3: if the dolphinfish is not a Sango then the graffito is not interior but it is a leaven. sent4: the angiogram is not a beastliness if the graffito is indecisive and it is a kind of a bey. sent5: the Arabist is either interior or a jumping or both. sent6: the dolphinfish is exculpatory. sent7: the dolphinfish is a kind of a bey if it corresponds reincarnationism. sent8: the angiogram is interior if the State is interior. sent9: The reincarnationism does correspond dolphinfish. sent10: the graffito is a beastliness if the dolphinfish is not a kind of a bey and/or it is not a kind of a beastliness. sent11: the dolphinfish does correspond reincarnationism. sent12: the dolphinfish is not a leaven. sent13: the fact that the Siberian is exculpatory is incorrect if the dolphinfish is a bey and it is a Sango. sent14: the angiogram is a Sango if it is not decisive. sent15: if something is not a kind of a leaven that it is not a Sango and it is indecisive is wrong. sent16: either something is not a bey or it is not a beastliness or both if it does not correspond reincarnationism. sent17: if that the angiogram is not a Sango but it is indecisive is not right then the Siberian is a Sango. sent18: the fact that something corresponds reincarnationism and is not exculpatory does not hold if it is a Sango. sent19: the fact that if the graffito is non-interior thing that is the leaven the graffito is not a beastliness is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent11 -> int1: the dolphinfish is a bey.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dolphinfish is a Sango.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dolphinfish is a bey and it is a Sango.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the Siberian is not exculpatory.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not exculpatory.; __UNKNOWN__