either the mountaineering does not occur or the credibleness does not occur or both if the advisableness happens.
sent1: if the footfall does not occur the fact that the sojourn does not occur and the Tasmanianness does not occur is false. sent2: the morticing Momotidae does not occur if the acceptation happens. sent3: that the credibleness does not occur results in that the BW and the Thoreauvianness occurs. sent4: that either the recusing does not occur or the Agriculture occurs or both is caused by the bar. sent5: the advisableness leads to that either the mountaineering occurs or the credibleness does not occur or both. sent6: both the sojourning and the footfall happens. sent7: the compensating iamb does not occur. sent8: either the mountaineering does not occur or the credibleness happens or both if that the BW does not occur is correct. sent9: the Tasmanianness happens if the fact that the sojourn does not occur and the Tasmanianness does not occur is wrong. sent10: that the acceptation and the forecasting neutron occurs is caused by that the cracking does not occur. sent11: the fact that the BW does not occur is correct if the advisableness and the sojourn happens. sent12: the credibleness does not occur if the frictionalness occurs. sent13: that the compensating iamb does not occur leads to that the mountaineering occurs and the compensating Othello happens. sent14: the frictionalness is caused by that the morticing Momotidae does not occur.
sent6 -> int1: the sojourning occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the advisableness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the advisableness happens and the sojourning occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the BW does not occur.;
the Tasmanianness and the Thoreauvianness happens.
sent13 & sent7 -> int4: the mountaineering happens and the compensating Othello happens.; int4 -> int5: the mountaineering occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = either the mountaineering does not occur or the credibleness does not occur or both if the advisableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the footfall does not occur the fact that the sojourn does not occur and the Tasmanianness does not occur is false. sent2: the morticing Momotidae does not occur if the acceptation happens. sent3: that the credibleness does not occur results in that the BW and the Thoreauvianness occurs. sent4: that either the recusing does not occur or the Agriculture occurs or both is caused by the bar. sent5: the advisableness leads to that either the mountaineering occurs or the credibleness does not occur or both. sent6: both the sojourning and the footfall happens. sent7: the compensating iamb does not occur. sent8: either the mountaineering does not occur or the credibleness happens or both if that the BW does not occur is correct. sent9: the Tasmanianness happens if the fact that the sojourn does not occur and the Tasmanianness does not occur is wrong. sent10: that the acceptation and the forecasting neutron occurs is caused by that the cracking does not occur. sent11: the fact that the BW does not occur is correct if the advisableness and the sojourn happens. sent12: the credibleness does not occur if the frictionalness occurs. sent13: that the compensating iamb does not occur leads to that the mountaineering occurs and the compensating Othello happens. sent14: the frictionalness is caused by that the morticing Momotidae does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the sojourning occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the advisableness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the advisableness happens and the sojourning occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the BW does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__