that the amputation does not occur or the ergotropicness occurs or both is incorrect.
sent1: both the acquisition and the thrilling mantel occurs. sent2: the thrilling mantel happens. sent3: the nonpoliticalness occurs. sent4: the Venezuelan does not occur if that both the acquisition and the branchialness happens is not wrong. sent5: that either the amputation does not occur or the ergotropicness occurs or both is wrong if the evening does not occur. sent6: if the branchialness does not occur the bedizening belemnite and the non-meridionalness happens. sent7: if the nonpoliticalness occurs the fluorescence occurs. sent8: the amputation occurs. sent9: the fact that the bedizening belemnite occurs but the meridionalness does not occur is false. sent10: if not the Venezuelanness but the fluorescence happens the fact that the evening does not occur hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the branchialness does not occur is right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the bedizening belemnite but not the meridionalness occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the branchialness occurs.; sent1 -> int4: the acquisition occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the acquisition happens and the branchialness occurs.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the Venezuelan does not occur.; sent7 & sent3 -> int7: the fluorescence occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: both the non-Venezuelanness and the fluorescence happens.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the evening does not occur.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the amputation does not occur or the ergotropicness occurs or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: both the acquisition and the thrilling mantel occurs. sent2: the thrilling mantel happens. sent3: the nonpoliticalness occurs. sent4: the Venezuelan does not occur if that both the acquisition and the branchialness happens is not wrong. sent5: that either the amputation does not occur or the ergotropicness occurs or both is wrong if the evening does not occur. sent6: if the branchialness does not occur the bedizening belemnite and the non-meridionalness happens. sent7: if the nonpoliticalness occurs the fluorescence occurs. sent8: the amputation occurs. sent9: the fact that the bedizening belemnite occurs but the meridionalness does not occur is false. sent10: if not the Venezuelanness but the fluorescence happens the fact that the evening does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the branchialness does not occur is right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the bedizening belemnite but not the meridionalness occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the branchialness occurs.; sent1 -> int4: the acquisition occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the acquisition happens and the branchialness occurs.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the Venezuelan does not occur.; sent7 & sent3 -> int7: the fluorescence occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: both the non-Venezuelanness and the fluorescence happens.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the evening does not occur.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__