the fact that the symposiast is not Judaic and it does not individuate necker is incorrect.
sent1: if the areaway is not non-Samoan then it is thermodynamics. sent2: the fact that the wagonwright is a sanitariness hold if that it is a Tibetan is true. sent3: the areaway is Samoan if the fact that the yokel is not a pellucidness and is not a kind of a magdalen is not correct. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a antiproton is correct. sent5: if the cockroach does not individuate necker the fact that the symposiast is Judaic but it does not individuate necker is not correct. sent6: if the areaway is not a sanitariness the wagonwright is not thermodynamics. sent7: the areaway does individuate necker and is immutable. sent8: if the areaway is thermodynamics the dope is not a antiproton but it is uvular. sent9: the fact that the yokel is both not a pellucidness and not a magdalen does not hold. sent10: that the wagonwright is not a sanitariness hold if something that is not a kind of a antiproton is uvular. sent11: if the yokel is not uvular then the fact that the dope is not a magdalen is right. sent12: if the dope does individuate necker then the wagonwright is both not a sanitariness and uvular. sent13: that the symposiast is Judaic but it does not individuate necker is wrong. sent14: the fact that the dope is not a antiproton but a pellucidness is not true. sent15: the cockroach does not individuate necker if the wagonwright is not a sanitariness. sent16: there are uvular things. sent17: if the areaway is thermodynamics then the dope is not a kind of a antiproton. sent18: if something does individuate necker then that it is uvular and it is not a sanitariness does not hold. sent19: that the symposiast is non-Judaic thing that does individuate necker is not true. sent20: if the cockroach does not individuate necker that the symposiast is a kind of non-Judaic thing that does individuate necker is not right. sent21: the fact that something is not thermodynamics and it is not Samoan does not hold if it is a antiproton. sent22: the yokel is Judaic if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-thermodynamics thing that is not a Samoan does not hold. sent23: that the symposiast is a kind of non-Judaic thing that does not individuate necker is not correct if that the cockroach does not individuate necker hold. sent24: the areaway is not non-Samoan if the fact that the yokel is a pellucidness hold. sent25: the wagonwright does not individuate necker.
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the areaway is a Samoan.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the areaway is thermodynamics.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the dope is not a antiproton but uvular.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is both not a antiproton and uvular is not wrong.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the wagonwright is not a sanitariness.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the cockroach does not individuate necker.; int6 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
the yokel is Judaic.
sent21 -> int7: the fact that the areaway is both not thermodynamics and not Samoan does not hold if it is a kind of a antiproton.; sent18 -> int8: if the areaway does individuate necker then that it is not non-uvular and not a sanitariness is not true.; sent7 -> int9: the areaway individuates necker.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the areaway is uvular but not a sanitariness is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the symposiast is not Judaic and it does not individuate necker is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the areaway is not non-Samoan then it is thermodynamics. sent2: the fact that the wagonwright is a sanitariness hold if that it is a Tibetan is true. sent3: the areaway is Samoan if the fact that the yokel is not a pellucidness and is not a kind of a magdalen is not correct. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a antiproton is correct. sent5: if the cockroach does not individuate necker the fact that the symposiast is Judaic but it does not individuate necker is not correct. sent6: if the areaway is not a sanitariness the wagonwright is not thermodynamics. sent7: the areaway does individuate necker and is immutable. sent8: if the areaway is thermodynamics the dope is not a antiproton but it is uvular. sent9: the fact that the yokel is both not a pellucidness and not a magdalen does not hold. sent10: that the wagonwright is not a sanitariness hold if something that is not a kind of a antiproton is uvular. sent11: if the yokel is not uvular then the fact that the dope is not a magdalen is right. sent12: if the dope does individuate necker then the wagonwright is both not a sanitariness and uvular. sent13: that the symposiast is Judaic but it does not individuate necker is wrong. sent14: the fact that the dope is not a antiproton but a pellucidness is not true. sent15: the cockroach does not individuate necker if the wagonwright is not a sanitariness. sent16: there are uvular things. sent17: if the areaway is thermodynamics then the dope is not a kind of a antiproton. sent18: if something does individuate necker then that it is uvular and it is not a sanitariness does not hold. sent19: that the symposiast is non-Judaic thing that does individuate necker is not true. sent20: if the cockroach does not individuate necker that the symposiast is a kind of non-Judaic thing that does individuate necker is not right. sent21: the fact that something is not thermodynamics and it is not Samoan does not hold if it is a antiproton. sent22: the yokel is Judaic if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-thermodynamics thing that is not a Samoan does not hold. sent23: that the symposiast is a kind of non-Judaic thing that does not individuate necker is not correct if that the cockroach does not individuate necker hold. sent24: the areaway is not non-Samoan if the fact that the yokel is a pellucidness hold. sent25: the wagonwright does not individuate necker. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the areaway is a Samoan.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the areaway is thermodynamics.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the dope is not a antiproton but uvular.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is both not a antiproton and uvular is not wrong.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the wagonwright is not a sanitariness.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the cockroach does not individuate necker.; int6 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__