the birth is circulatory but it is not scalar.
sent1: the birth is not printable. sent2: the tailorbird is a intactness and it is a kind of a ketorolac. sent3: if that the washboard is not circulatory is not wrong then the birth is circulatory but it is not a intactness. sent4: that something either is not a kind of a Acular or is not scalar or both is incorrect if it does not quickstep. sent5: the birth is not branchial. sent6: the fact that something is not non-circulatory and is not a scalar is not true if it is branchial. sent7: the birth is circulatory if the washboard is not circulatory. sent8: the birth is circulatory. sent9: the washboard is a intactness. sent10: something is branchial if that it is both not a Acular and not branchial is incorrect. sent11: if the washboard is a intactness that is printable then it is not branchial. sent12: if the birth is a kind of circulatory thing that is printable then it is not branchial. sent13: the washboard is a kind of a intactness and it is printable. sent14: if the washboard is not branchial that it is not circulatory is right. sent15: the birth does whelp and reigns birth. sent16: if something is not scalar then the fact that it is a kind of branchial thing that is not circulatory does not hold. sent17: the fact that the washboard is not scalar is not false if that either the birth is not a kind of a Acular or it is scalar or both is not true. sent18: if that something is not a quickstep is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a Acular and it is not branchial is not correct.
sent11 & sent13 -> int1: the washboard is not branchial.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the washboard is not circulatory.;
the fact that the birth is a kind of circulatory thing that is not a scalar is not correct.
sent6 -> int3: that the birth is not non-circulatory but it is not a kind of a scalar does not hold if it is branchial.; sent10 -> int4: the birth is branchial if the fact that it is not a kind of a Acular and it is not branchial is wrong.; sent18 -> int5: if the birth is not a kind of a quickstep the fact that it is not a Acular and is not branchial is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the birth is circulatory but it is not scalar. ; $context$ = sent1: the birth is not printable. sent2: the tailorbird is a intactness and it is a kind of a ketorolac. sent3: if that the washboard is not circulatory is not wrong then the birth is circulatory but it is not a intactness. sent4: that something either is not a kind of a Acular or is not scalar or both is incorrect if it does not quickstep. sent5: the birth is not branchial. sent6: the fact that something is not non-circulatory and is not a scalar is not true if it is branchial. sent7: the birth is circulatory if the washboard is not circulatory. sent8: the birth is circulatory. sent9: the washboard is a intactness. sent10: something is branchial if that it is both not a Acular and not branchial is incorrect. sent11: if the washboard is a intactness that is printable then it is not branchial. sent12: if the birth is a kind of circulatory thing that is printable then it is not branchial. sent13: the washboard is a kind of a intactness and it is printable. sent14: if the washboard is not branchial that it is not circulatory is right. sent15: the birth does whelp and reigns birth. sent16: if something is not scalar then the fact that it is a kind of branchial thing that is not circulatory does not hold. sent17: the fact that the washboard is not scalar is not false if that either the birth is not a kind of a Acular or it is scalar or both is not true. sent18: if that something is not a quickstep is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a Acular and it is not branchial is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent13 -> int1: the washboard is not branchial.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the washboard is not circulatory.; __UNKNOWN__