the fact that the mare is not chromatographic but it does snuffle couplet is not right.
sent1: if the Ulster is not a lanthanoid then it is an informant. sent2: something is an informant if it is not a kind of a lanthanoid. sent3: the fact that the mare is chromatographic and it snuffles couplet is not right. sent4: if the fact that that something does snuffle squinter and it is a kind of an informant is not false is wrong it is not chromatographic. sent5: if the towhee snuffles couplet that it is not chromatographic and is fungoid is not right. sent6: that the mare is a kind of chromatographic thing that snuffles couplet is not correct if the Ulster is fungoid. sent7: the slush is a lanthanoid. sent8: the mare is fungoid. sent9: the Ulster snuffles tipper if it is chromatographic. sent10: if that the mare is not chromatographic but it does snuffle couplet is not right then it snuffles squinter. sent11: something is fungoid if it snuffles squinter. sent12: if the Ulster is fungoid then the fact that the mare is not chromatographic but it does snuffle couplet is incorrect. sent13: if the fact that something does not snuffle tipper but it is a lanthanoid does not hold then it is a kind of an informant. sent14: if that that something is not fungoid but it does snuffle couplet is correct is not right it snuffles tipper. sent15: the mare is an informant if the fact that the towhee is not chromatographic but it is fungoid is not correct. sent16: the fact that the washout does not snuffle squinter but it is a stanza does not hold. sent17: there is nothing such that it does not snuffle tipper and it is a kind of a lanthanoid.
sent13 -> int1: that the Ulster is an informant is not false if that it does not snuffle tipper and it is a lanthanoid does not hold.; sent17 -> int2: that the Ulster does not snuffle tipper but it is a lanthanoid is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Ulster is an informant.; sent11 -> int4: the Ulster is fungoid if it snuffles squinter.;
the rhodolite does snuffle squinter.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mare is not chromatographic but it does snuffle couplet is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Ulster is not a lanthanoid then it is an informant. sent2: something is an informant if it is not a kind of a lanthanoid. sent3: the fact that the mare is chromatographic and it snuffles couplet is not right. sent4: if the fact that that something does snuffle squinter and it is a kind of an informant is not false is wrong it is not chromatographic. sent5: if the towhee snuffles couplet that it is not chromatographic and is fungoid is not right. sent6: that the mare is a kind of chromatographic thing that snuffles couplet is not correct if the Ulster is fungoid. sent7: the slush is a lanthanoid. sent8: the mare is fungoid. sent9: the Ulster snuffles tipper if it is chromatographic. sent10: if that the mare is not chromatographic but it does snuffle couplet is not right then it snuffles squinter. sent11: something is fungoid if it snuffles squinter. sent12: if the Ulster is fungoid then the fact that the mare is not chromatographic but it does snuffle couplet is incorrect. sent13: if the fact that something does not snuffle tipper but it is a lanthanoid does not hold then it is a kind of an informant. sent14: if that that something is not fungoid but it does snuffle couplet is correct is not right it snuffles tipper. sent15: the mare is an informant if the fact that the towhee is not chromatographic but it is fungoid is not correct. sent16: the fact that the washout does not snuffle squinter but it is a stanza does not hold. sent17: there is nothing such that it does not snuffle tipper and it is a kind of a lanthanoid. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: that the Ulster is an informant is not false if that it does not snuffle tipper and it is a lanthanoid does not hold.; sent17 -> int2: that the Ulster does not snuffle tipper but it is a lanthanoid is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Ulster is an informant.; sent11 -> int4: the Ulster is fungoid if it snuffles squinter.; __UNKNOWN__