the fact that there is something such that if it does not offer rigging that it does allow and is dacitic is false is false.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Wilmut it does message and it is pedunculate. sent2: if something is a faction then that that it does convoy trailing and is a caulk is not wrong is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it is not holographic then that it does unbend choreography and is barometric does not hold. sent4: if that the choreography is a chatterer is true then the fact that it is a kind of a Francophile and it does allow does not hold. sent5: if the panelist does offer rigging then the fact that it does allow and it is dacitic is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a noodle it is a kind of a grouper and it is Rhodesian. sent7: the fact that something does allow and it is dacitic is false if the fact that it does offer rigging is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it offers rigging the fact that it allows and is dacitic is not true. sent9: the fact that something allows and is dacitic is wrong if it does not offer rigging. sent10: that something is myalgic and does unbend risklessness is not correct if it does tease Cebus. sent11: something teases Plano and it is cathodic if it is not a Wilmut. sent12: if something is not a Trevino then that it does unbend brooklime and it is contrapuntal is not correct.
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the panelist does allow and is dacitic is not correct if it does not offer rigging.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a Trevino that it does unbend brooklime and is contrapuntal does not hold.
sent12 -> int2: that the ovenware unbends brooklime and it is contrapuntal is not right if it is not a kind of a Trevino.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not offer rigging that it does allow and is dacitic is false is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Wilmut it does message and it is pedunculate. sent2: if something is a faction then that that it does convoy trailing and is a caulk is not wrong is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it is not holographic then that it does unbend choreography and is barometric does not hold. sent4: if that the choreography is a chatterer is true then the fact that it is a kind of a Francophile and it does allow does not hold. sent5: if the panelist does offer rigging then the fact that it does allow and it is dacitic is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a noodle it is a kind of a grouper and it is Rhodesian. sent7: the fact that something does allow and it is dacitic is false if the fact that it does offer rigging is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it offers rigging the fact that it allows and is dacitic is not true. sent9: the fact that something allows and is dacitic is wrong if it does not offer rigging. sent10: that something is myalgic and does unbend risklessness is not correct if it does tease Cebus. sent11: something teases Plano and it is cathodic if it is not a Wilmut. sent12: if something is not a Trevino then that it does unbend brooklime and it is contrapuntal is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the panelist does allow and is dacitic is not correct if it does not offer rigging.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__