the trundling spearfish does not occur.
sent1: the caulineness does not occur if that the toll-freeness and/or the non-peripheralness occurs does not hold. sent2: if the inside occurs then the fact that not the toll-freeness but the venesection occurs hold. sent3: if the peripheralness happens the fact that not the measuring phrontistery but the discrimination occurs is not false. sent4: that the insideness occurs is not wrong. sent5: the prescriptionness does not occur if both the non-toll-freeness and the non-peripheralness occurs. sent6: the ampleness occurs. sent7: the trundling spearfish happens if the prescriptionness does not occur and/or the miss does not occur. sent8: if the ampleness happens then that the fact that not the measuring phrontistery but the discrimination happens is not incorrect does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peripheral occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the measuring phrontistery does not occur and the discrimination occurs.; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: that not the measuring phrontistery but the discrimination happens is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the peripheral does not occur is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent4 -> int5: both the non-toll-freeness and the venesection happens.; int5 -> int6: the toll-freeness does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the non-toll-freeness and the non-peripheralness happens.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the prescriptionness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the prescription does not occur and/or the missing does not occur.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
either the caulineness does not occur or the dubbing Managua does not occur or both.
$hypothesis$ = the trundling spearfish does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the caulineness does not occur if that the toll-freeness and/or the non-peripheralness occurs does not hold. sent2: if the inside occurs then the fact that not the toll-freeness but the venesection occurs hold. sent3: if the peripheralness happens the fact that not the measuring phrontistery but the discrimination occurs is not false. sent4: that the insideness occurs is not wrong. sent5: the prescriptionness does not occur if both the non-toll-freeness and the non-peripheralness occurs. sent6: the ampleness occurs. sent7: the trundling spearfish happens if the prescriptionness does not occur and/or the miss does not occur. sent8: if the ampleness happens then that the fact that not the measuring phrontistery but the discrimination happens is not incorrect does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peripheral occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the measuring phrontistery does not occur and the discrimination occurs.; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: that not the measuring phrontistery but the discrimination happens is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the peripheral does not occur is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent4 -> int5: both the non-toll-freeness and the venesection happens.; int5 -> int6: the toll-freeness does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the non-toll-freeness and the non-peripheralness happens.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the prescriptionness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the prescription does not occur and/or the missing does not occur.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__