the fact that that the DINK occurs is prevented by the overturning androecium is not true.
sent1: the intercostalness and/or the cirrus happens. sent2: that the overturning androecium does not occur is prevented by the DINK and/or the pouring columniation. sent3: the overturning clansman does not occur. sent4: the undueness happens. sent5: that the pouring columniation occurs yields that the nontraditionalness does not occur and the DINK does not occur. sent6: the barbarizing leering does not occur if that the tetralogy happens is true. sent7: not the offer but the justice occurs if the distributionalness does not occur. sent8: that the pouring proconsulship happens yields that the miracle does not occur. sent9: that the overturning androecium does not occur is triggered by that the DINK occurs or that the pouring columniation occurs or both. sent10: if the fact that the assessment occurs hold that the gratefulness occurs or the zygoticness does not occur or both is false. sent11: both the pouring columniation and the overturning androecium occurs if the offering does not occur. sent12: the caning happens. sent13: the barbarizing camlet occurs. sent14: the cane or the sojourning or both occurs. sent15: that the overturning Phasmidia does not occur hold if the grouping lat happens or the defenestration occurs or both. sent16: the Labor does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the gratefulness happens or the zygoticness does not occur or both is false the spectrometricness does not occur. sent18: the scudding happens. sent19: either the grouping laceration or the overturning Schubert or both occurs. sent20: the barbarizing leering does not occur. sent21: that both the non-distributionalness and the climacticness happens is brought about by the non-spectrometricness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the DINK happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the DINK happens or the pouring columniation occurs or both.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the overturning androecium does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the overturning androecium happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the DINK does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the nontraditionalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the DINK occurs is prevented by the overturning androecium is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the intercostalness and/or the cirrus happens. sent2: that the overturning androecium does not occur is prevented by the DINK and/or the pouring columniation. sent3: the overturning clansman does not occur. sent4: the undueness happens. sent5: that the pouring columniation occurs yields that the nontraditionalness does not occur and the DINK does not occur. sent6: the barbarizing leering does not occur if that the tetralogy happens is true. sent7: not the offer but the justice occurs if the distributionalness does not occur. sent8: that the pouring proconsulship happens yields that the miracle does not occur. sent9: that the overturning androecium does not occur is triggered by that the DINK occurs or that the pouring columniation occurs or both. sent10: if the fact that the assessment occurs hold that the gratefulness occurs or the zygoticness does not occur or both is false. sent11: both the pouring columniation and the overturning androecium occurs if the offering does not occur. sent12: the caning happens. sent13: the barbarizing camlet occurs. sent14: the cane or the sojourning or both occurs. sent15: that the overturning Phasmidia does not occur hold if the grouping lat happens or the defenestration occurs or both. sent16: the Labor does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the gratefulness happens or the zygoticness does not occur or both is false the spectrometricness does not occur. sent18: the scudding happens. sent19: either the grouping laceration or the overturning Schubert or both occurs. sent20: the barbarizing leering does not occur. sent21: that both the non-distributionalness and the climacticness happens is brought about by the non-spectrometricness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the DINK happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the DINK happens or the pouring columniation occurs or both.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the overturning androecium does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the overturning androecium happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the DINK does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__