there exists something such that if that the fact that it is a kind of a allosaur and desexualizes inkwell is not false is not true it does not urticate highbinder.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a allosaur and it desexualizes inkwell hold it does not urticate highbinder. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is arundinaceous thing that is a kind of a Hun is not correct then it is not a kind of a permanganate. sent3: there exists something such that if that it mounds Colossae and it is affined is false then it is not bilious. sent4: there is something such that if it does not desexualize inkwell then it does not urticate highbinder. sent5: there is something such that if that it is an archer and it skids is incorrect then it is not paradigmatic. sent6: the roux does not urticate highbinder if it does not desexualize inkwell. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is both a Indian and an affine is incorrect it does not desexualize antipasto. sent8: if the fact that the roux is a allosaur and it does desexualize inkwell does not hold it does not urticate highbinder. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a allosaur and it desexualizes inkwell is incorrect it does urticate highbinder. sent10: the roux is not hemispheric if the fact that it does desexualize inkwell and it is fissile is incorrect. sent11: the roux does not urticate highbinder if it is a allosaur and it desexualizes inkwell. sent12: the roux urticates highbinder if the fact that it is a allosaur and it does desexualize inkwell is not correct. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a allosaur it does not urticate highbinder. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is nonreflective and it is a kind of a romantic does not hold then that it is not a kind of a dead is not wrong. sent15: if that the bergamot is nonexploratory and it is inflationary is not right it is not a allosaur. sent16: if that something is a Mauritanian and it is holy is incorrect it does not urticate highbinder. sent17: if the fact that the roux does desexualize exoneration and is a allosaur is incorrect it is not a triiodothyronine. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that it is offside and it is a Fergon is incorrect then it is not an affined. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it is bigger a Volgograd is not correct it is not a parasympathetic.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
if that the roux is both a Mauritanian and holy is wrong then it does not urticate highbinder.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that the fact that it is a kind of a allosaur and desexualizes inkwell is not false is not true it does not urticate highbinder. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a allosaur and it desexualizes inkwell hold it does not urticate highbinder. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is arundinaceous thing that is a kind of a Hun is not correct then it is not a kind of a permanganate. sent3: there exists something such that if that it mounds Colossae and it is affined is false then it is not bilious. sent4: there is something such that if it does not desexualize inkwell then it does not urticate highbinder. sent5: there is something such that if that it is an archer and it skids is incorrect then it is not paradigmatic. sent6: the roux does not urticate highbinder if it does not desexualize inkwell. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is both a Indian and an affine is incorrect it does not desexualize antipasto. sent8: if the fact that the roux is a allosaur and it does desexualize inkwell does not hold it does not urticate highbinder. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a allosaur and it desexualizes inkwell is incorrect it does urticate highbinder. sent10: the roux is not hemispheric if the fact that it does desexualize inkwell and it is fissile is incorrect. sent11: the roux does not urticate highbinder if it is a allosaur and it desexualizes inkwell. sent12: the roux urticates highbinder if the fact that it is a allosaur and it does desexualize inkwell is not correct. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a allosaur it does not urticate highbinder. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is nonreflective and it is a kind of a romantic does not hold then that it is not a kind of a dead is not wrong. sent15: if that the bergamot is nonexploratory and it is inflationary is not right it is not a allosaur. sent16: if that something is a Mauritanian and it is holy is incorrect it does not urticate highbinder. sent17: if the fact that the roux does desexualize exoneration and is a allosaur is incorrect it is not a triiodothyronine. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that it is offside and it is a Fergon is incorrect then it is not an affined. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it is bigger a Volgograd is not correct it is not a parasympathetic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__