the hypsometer does not billow divers.
sent1: the fact that something does not billow divers but it is a impalement does not hold if it does not theologize. sent2: that something does not theologize but it billows divers is incorrect if it is veinal. sent3: there is something such that it is not a GCSE and it is not a kind of a Turkish. sent4: if something is not a GCSE and it is not a kind of a Turkish then the hypsometer does not theologize. sent5: the hypsometer staves. sent6: if the hypsometer does stave then it is veinal.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the hypsometer does not theologize.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hypsometer does billow divers.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hypsometer does not theologize but it billows divers.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the hypsometer does not theologize and does billow divers is wrong if that it is veinal is true.; sent6 & sent5 -> int4: the hypsometer is veinal.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the hypsometer does not theologize and does billow divers hold does not hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the stirrup does not billow divers and is a impalement is not correct.
sent1 -> int7: the fact that the stirrup does not billow divers but it is a impalement is false if it does not theologize.;
$hypothesis$ = the hypsometer does not billow divers. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not billow divers but it is a impalement does not hold if it does not theologize. sent2: that something does not theologize but it billows divers is incorrect if it is veinal. sent3: there is something such that it is not a GCSE and it is not a kind of a Turkish. sent4: if something is not a GCSE and it is not a kind of a Turkish then the hypsometer does not theologize. sent5: the hypsometer staves. sent6: if the hypsometer does stave then it is veinal. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the hypsometer does not theologize.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hypsometer does billow divers.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hypsometer does not theologize but it billows divers.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the hypsometer does not theologize and does billow divers is wrong if that it is veinal is true.; sent6 & sent5 -> int4: the hypsometer is veinal.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the hypsometer does not theologize and does billow divers hold does not hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__