the immunotherapeuticness does not occur and/or the DINK does not occur.
sent1: the immunotherapeuticness occurs or the DINK does not occur or both. sent2: the snatch happens. sent3: that the imprecation happens hold. sent4: the undressing Eruca does not occur. sent5: the undressing flypaper does not occur but the noncaloricness occurs. sent6: if the undressing flypaper does not occur the fact that the bopping audiometer does not occur and the speech does not occur is not true. sent7: that the ampleness but not the undressing Eruca occurs is triggered by the forbearing. sent8: the traversing happens. sent9: the bopping cytoarchitecture does not occur. sent10: if the ampleness happens but the undressing Eruca does not occur the imprecation does not occur. sent11: the self-control happens. sent12: the snatching occurs and the forbearing occurs if the Marathon does not occur. sent13: if that the bopping audiometer does not occur and the speech does not occur does not hold then that the bopping audiometer happens is not false. sent14: the shrinkableness does not occur. sent15: the fact that the lockage does not occur is not wrong. sent16: both the undressing curiousness and the malingering knout occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Marathon does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the snatching and the forbearing occurs.; int1 -> int2: the forbearing happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the ampleness but not the undressing Eruca occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the imprecation does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Marathon happens.; sent5 -> int7: that the undressing flypaper does not occur is not false.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the bopping audiometer does not occur and the speech does not occur is incorrect.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the bopping audiometer happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the Marathon happens and the bopping audiometer happens.;
the fact that the immunotherapeuticness does not occur and/or the DINK does not occur does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the immunotherapeuticness does not occur and/or the DINK does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the immunotherapeuticness occurs or the DINK does not occur or both. sent2: the snatch happens. sent3: that the imprecation happens hold. sent4: the undressing Eruca does not occur. sent5: the undressing flypaper does not occur but the noncaloricness occurs. sent6: if the undressing flypaper does not occur the fact that the bopping audiometer does not occur and the speech does not occur is not true. sent7: that the ampleness but not the undressing Eruca occurs is triggered by the forbearing. sent8: the traversing happens. sent9: the bopping cytoarchitecture does not occur. sent10: if the ampleness happens but the undressing Eruca does not occur the imprecation does not occur. sent11: the self-control happens. sent12: the snatching occurs and the forbearing occurs if the Marathon does not occur. sent13: if that the bopping audiometer does not occur and the speech does not occur does not hold then that the bopping audiometer happens is not false. sent14: the shrinkableness does not occur. sent15: the fact that the lockage does not occur is not wrong. sent16: both the undressing curiousness and the malingering knout occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Marathon does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the snatching and the forbearing occurs.; int1 -> int2: the forbearing happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the ampleness but not the undressing Eruca occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the imprecation does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Marathon happens.; sent5 -> int7: that the undressing flypaper does not occur is not false.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the bopping audiometer does not occur and the speech does not occur is incorrect.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the bopping audiometer happens.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the Marathon happens and the bopping audiometer happens.; __UNKNOWN__