that if that the self-discovery does not occur hold the refacing knuckleball does not occur is false.
sent1: if the fact that the backfiring does not occur and the slapping does not occur is not true the fossorialness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the servicing expedience and the somatosensoriness happens is not true the antigenicness does not occur. sent3: the antigenicness does not occur. sent4: that the refacing knuckleball does not occur is triggered by that the cackling does not occur but the self-discovery happens. sent5: that the cackling does not occur and the self-discovery does not occur triggers that the refacing knuckleball does not occur. sent6: the non-fossorialness and/or the Mendelianness happens. sent7: if the cackling does not occur and the self-discovery does not occur then the refacing knuckleball occurs. sent8: that the backfire does not occur but the slapping occurs does not hold if the cackle occurs. sent9: the employableness does not occur. sent10: the Mendelian is prevented by that the refacing knuckleball does not occur and the self-discovery does not occur. sent11: if the refacing naiad happens then that the fossorialness does not occur and/or the Mendelianness does not occur does not hold. sent12: the fact that the backfiring occurs and the slapping does not occur is not right. sent13: the fact that the refacing knuckleball does not occur hold if that the self-discovery occurs is right. sent14: the refacing knuckleball occurs if the self-discovery does not occur. sent15: the refacing naiad causes that the Mendelian occurs. sent16: if the cackling occurs then the fact that the backfire does not occur and the slap does not occur is false. sent17: if the cackling happens that the backfiring happens but the slapping does not occur is not correct. sent18: if the fracturing ylem does not occur then the refacing naiad happens. sent19: the freesianess happens if that the fossorialness but not the cackling occurs is not true. sent20: the fact that the Mendelian occurs is not incorrect. sent21: the fracturing recusancy does not occur and the refacing take-up does not occur. sent22: if the Mendelian does not occur the fact that the fossorialness happens and the cackling does not occur does not hold. sent23: that the backfiring does not occur and the slapping occurs is incorrect. sent24: the fracturing ylem does not occur and the antigenicness does not occur. sent25: the celioscopy does not occur if the face-off occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cackling happens.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that that the backfiring does not occur and the slap does not occur does not hold hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fossorialness does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the non-fossorialness or the non-Mendelianness or both occurs.; sent24 -> int4: the fracturing ylem does not occur.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the refacing naiad occurs.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the non-fossorialness or the non-Mendelianness or both happens does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the cackling does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the self-discovery does not occur.; int8 & assump2 -> int9: the cackling does not occur and the self-discovery does not occur.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the refacing knuckleball does not occur.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the freeing happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if that the self-discovery does not occur hold the refacing knuckleball does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the backfiring does not occur and the slapping does not occur is not true the fossorialness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the servicing expedience and the somatosensoriness happens is not true the antigenicness does not occur. sent3: the antigenicness does not occur. sent4: that the refacing knuckleball does not occur is triggered by that the cackling does not occur but the self-discovery happens. sent5: that the cackling does not occur and the self-discovery does not occur triggers that the refacing knuckleball does not occur. sent6: the non-fossorialness and/or the Mendelianness happens. sent7: if the cackling does not occur and the self-discovery does not occur then the refacing knuckleball occurs. sent8: that the backfire does not occur but the slapping occurs does not hold if the cackle occurs. sent9: the employableness does not occur. sent10: the Mendelian is prevented by that the refacing knuckleball does not occur and the self-discovery does not occur. sent11: if the refacing naiad happens then that the fossorialness does not occur and/or the Mendelianness does not occur does not hold. sent12: the fact that the backfiring occurs and the slapping does not occur is not right. sent13: the fact that the refacing knuckleball does not occur hold if that the self-discovery occurs is right. sent14: the refacing knuckleball occurs if the self-discovery does not occur. sent15: the refacing naiad causes that the Mendelian occurs. sent16: if the cackling occurs then the fact that the backfire does not occur and the slap does not occur is false. sent17: if the cackling happens that the backfiring happens but the slapping does not occur is not correct. sent18: if the fracturing ylem does not occur then the refacing naiad happens. sent19: the freesianess happens if that the fossorialness but not the cackling occurs is not true. sent20: the fact that the Mendelian occurs is not incorrect. sent21: the fracturing recusancy does not occur and the refacing take-up does not occur. sent22: if the Mendelian does not occur the fact that the fossorialness happens and the cackling does not occur does not hold. sent23: that the backfiring does not occur and the slapping occurs is incorrect. sent24: the fracturing ylem does not occur and the antigenicness does not occur. sent25: the celioscopy does not occur if the face-off occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cackling happens.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that that the backfiring does not occur and the slap does not occur does not hold hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fossorialness does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the non-fossorialness or the non-Mendelianness or both occurs.; sent24 -> int4: the fracturing ylem does not occur.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the refacing naiad occurs.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the non-fossorialness or the non-Mendelianness or both happens does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the cackling does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the self-discovery does not occur.; int8 & assump2 -> int9: the cackling does not occur and the self-discovery does not occur.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the refacing knuckleball does not occur.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__