the snood does not assume hebetude.
sent1: that the Split does not assume hebetude but it assumes Parliamentarian is incorrect. sent2: the Split is androgynous. sent3: the Split is a scare. sent4: that the dial does not assume Parliamentarian is not true. sent5: if that the Split does not assume Parliamentarian but it is unemotional is not correct then the snood does assume hebetude. sent6: the snood does not assume hebetude if the Split assume hebetude. sent7: the fact that the Split assumes Parliamentarian and is unemotional is not correct. sent8: that the snood does not spend iguanodon but it is a scare is wrong. sent9: the fact that that the Split does not assume Parliamentarian and is unemotional does not hold hold if it is a scare. sent10: the gong is unemotional.
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Split does not assume Parliamentarian but it is unemotional is incorrect.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the snood does not assume hebetude.
$hypothesis$ = the snood does not assume hebetude. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Split does not assume hebetude but it assumes Parliamentarian is incorrect. sent2: the Split is androgynous. sent3: the Split is a scare. sent4: that the dial does not assume Parliamentarian is not true. sent5: if that the Split does not assume Parliamentarian but it is unemotional is not correct then the snood does assume hebetude. sent6: the snood does not assume hebetude if the Split assume hebetude. sent7: the fact that the Split assumes Parliamentarian and is unemotional is not correct. sent8: that the snood does not spend iguanodon but it is a scare is wrong. sent9: the fact that that the Split does not assume Parliamentarian and is unemotional does not hold hold if it is a scare. sent10: the gong is unemotional. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Split does not assume Parliamentarian but it is unemotional is incorrect.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__