if the nacelle is a legged it is gyral and it is non-sociobiologic.
sent1: the fact that something is gyral thing that does not unveil lumber is not true if it is a kind of a protectionism. sent2: if the nacelle is a legged it is gyral and it is sociobiologic. sent3: something is a kind of a protectionism and is a legged if it does not falsify Balfour. sent4: if the nacelle is gyral but it is not sociobiologic then that it is not a legged is correct. sent5: the nacelle is not a kind of a converse. sent6: the nacelle is a kind of gyral thing that is not toothless. sent7: the nacelle is sociobiologic. sent8: the nacelle is gyral if it is a legged. sent9: if that the nacelle is gyral but it is not sociobiologic is not true it is not a legged. sent10: the fact that if that the nacelle dates profiterole but it does not unveil pinhead is not true then that the kummel does not falsify Balfour hold hold. sent11: if the nacelle is not gyral then it is not a legged. sent12: if the fact that the nacelle is a kind of gyral thing that is sociobiologic does not hold then it is not a legged. sent13: the fact that the nacelle is gyral is correct. sent14: the nacelle is gyral and it is sociobiologic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nacelle is gyral but it is not sociobiologic does not hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the nacelle is not a legged.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nacelle is a kind of a legged.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the nacelle is gyral but it is not sociobiologic.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the kummel is gyral and does not unveil lumber is not right.
sent1 -> int4: if the kummel is a protectionism then the fact that it is a kind of gyral thing that does not unveil lumber does not hold.; sent3 -> int5: the kummel is a protectionism and a legged if it does not falsify Balfour.;
$hypothesis$ = if the nacelle is a legged it is gyral and it is non-sociobiologic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is gyral thing that does not unveil lumber is not true if it is a kind of a protectionism. sent2: if the nacelle is a legged it is gyral and it is sociobiologic. sent3: something is a kind of a protectionism and is a legged if it does not falsify Balfour. sent4: if the nacelle is gyral but it is not sociobiologic then that it is not a legged is correct. sent5: the nacelle is not a kind of a converse. sent6: the nacelle is a kind of gyral thing that is not toothless. sent7: the nacelle is sociobiologic. sent8: the nacelle is gyral if it is a legged. sent9: if that the nacelle is gyral but it is not sociobiologic is not true it is not a legged. sent10: the fact that if that the nacelle dates profiterole but it does not unveil pinhead is not true then that the kummel does not falsify Balfour hold hold. sent11: if the nacelle is not gyral then it is not a legged. sent12: if the fact that the nacelle is a kind of gyral thing that is sociobiologic does not hold then it is not a legged. sent13: the fact that the nacelle is gyral is correct. sent14: the nacelle is gyral and it is sociobiologic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nacelle is gyral but it is not sociobiologic does not hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the nacelle is not a legged.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nacelle is a kind of a legged.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the nacelle is gyral but it is not sociobiologic.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__