the fact that the electroencephalograph does not scent centering is right.
sent1: there exists something such that that it does not scent scunner and it does service pacification does not hold. sent2: the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship if there is something such that that it does not scent scunner and services pacification is false. sent3: the autodidact does not scent centering. sent4: if something is impersonal that it is not insecticidal and it does not compel statesmanship is not true. sent5: if there is something such that it compels rya the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship. sent6: that the electroencephalograph is a kind of the wistfulness if the electroencephalograph is not nosohusial and does not scent centering is not wrong. sent7: the electroencephalograph does not scent centering if it is a sassaby and/or it is acrocentric. sent8: if something does not compel statesmanship and is not a walk-in it is insecticidal. sent9: if there is something such that that it does not compel crop and is a Benzoin is wrong then the electroencephalograph does not compel deconstructivism. sent10: the crayon does compel statesmanship if there exists something such that that it is not insecticidal and it does not compel statesmanship does not hold. sent11: if the BIN does not scent scunner it does service pacification and is impersonal. sent12: if the ergot is not a walk-in the electroencephalograph is a circuitry and it scents centering. sent13: there is something such that it is a circuitry. sent14: the fact that the electroencephalograph is not a walk-in is not wrong if something is a circuitry. sent15: the electroencephalograph scents centering if it is not chlorotic and is not hepatic. sent16: the BIN does not scent scunner.
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: that the electroencephalograph is a walk-in is not correct.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship and it is not a walk-in.; sent8 -> int4: if the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship and it is not a walk-in then that it is insecticidal hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the electroencephalograph is insecticidal.; int5 -> int6: that the electroencephalograph is insecticidal or is impersonal or both hold.;
the electroencephalograph does scent centering.
sent4 -> int7: if the BIN is impersonal then that it is not insecticidal and it does not compel statesmanship is incorrect.; sent11 & sent16 -> int8: the BIN services pacification and is impersonal.; int8 -> int9: the BIN is impersonal.; int7 & int9 -> int10: that the BIN is a kind of non-insecticidal thing that does not compel statesmanship is not true.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is not insecticidal and it does not compel statesmanship is not right.; int11 & sent10 -> int12: the crayon compels statesmanship.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does compel statesmanship.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the electroencephalograph does not scent centering is right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it does not scent scunner and it does service pacification does not hold. sent2: the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship if there is something such that that it does not scent scunner and services pacification is false. sent3: the autodidact does not scent centering. sent4: if something is impersonal that it is not insecticidal and it does not compel statesmanship is not true. sent5: if there is something such that it compels rya the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship. sent6: that the electroencephalograph is a kind of the wistfulness if the electroencephalograph is not nosohusial and does not scent centering is not wrong. sent7: the electroencephalograph does not scent centering if it is a sassaby and/or it is acrocentric. sent8: if something does not compel statesmanship and is not a walk-in it is insecticidal. sent9: if there is something such that that it does not compel crop and is a Benzoin is wrong then the electroencephalograph does not compel deconstructivism. sent10: the crayon does compel statesmanship if there exists something such that that it is not insecticidal and it does not compel statesmanship does not hold. sent11: if the BIN does not scent scunner it does service pacification and is impersonal. sent12: if the ergot is not a walk-in the electroencephalograph is a circuitry and it scents centering. sent13: there is something such that it is a circuitry. sent14: the fact that the electroencephalograph is not a walk-in is not wrong if something is a circuitry. sent15: the electroencephalograph scents centering if it is not chlorotic and is not hepatic. sent16: the BIN does not scent scunner. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: that the electroencephalograph is a walk-in is not correct.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship and it is not a walk-in.; sent8 -> int4: if the electroencephalograph does not compel statesmanship and it is not a walk-in then that it is insecticidal hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the electroencephalograph is insecticidal.; int5 -> int6: that the electroencephalograph is insecticidal or is impersonal or both hold.; __UNKNOWN__