that the adumbration is not lax and it is not surface-to-air is not correct.
sent1: if something is not an innings then it is a metonymy. sent2: the adumbration is a kind of a metonymy. sent3: if the silver-lace is not a claystone it is proud and it is not a antihypertensive. sent4: something is not surface-to-air if it is a kind of a metonymy and it is a kind of an innings. sent5: if the fact that something is audible and it does strand does not hold it is not an innings. sent6: if the cutoff is a kind of a metonymy then the adumbration is not an egoism and it is not a male. sent7: the fact that something does not assail despair is not incorrect if that it pages readout or it is insubstantial or both is not correct. sent8: something is non-osteal if it does not assail despair. sent9: that either the narrow-body does page readout or it is insubstantial or both is not correct if there is something such that it is a sight. sent10: the adumbration is an innings. sent11: the silver-lace is a kind of a brickkiln. sent12: the cutoff is not an innings if the narrow-body is an innings and it is surface-to-air. sent13: if the fact that either the vermicide is not lax or it does not chance tabasco or both is incorrect the narrow-body is surface-to-air. sent14: the cutoff is not a metonymy if the fact that it is a kind of an innings and chances tabasco does not hold. sent15: that the cutoff is an innings and it chances tabasco does not hold if something is not an innings. sent16: if something is not osteal then that it is not inaudible and it strands does not hold. sent17: the vermicide is not inexpressible if the silver-lace is a brickkiln and it is proud. sent18: the adumbration is not lax. sent19: if something is not inexpressible then it is a sight that appends. sent20: the silver-lace is not a claystone. sent21: the mephobarbital is not an innings.
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the adumbration is a metonymy and an innings.; sent4 -> int2: the adumbration is not surface-to-air if it is a metonymy that is a kind of an innings.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adumbration is not surface-to-air.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the adumbration is both not an egoism and not a male.
sent1 -> int4: the cutoff is a kind of a metonymy if it is not an innings.;
$hypothesis$ = that the adumbration is not lax and it is not surface-to-air is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not an innings then it is a metonymy. sent2: the adumbration is a kind of a metonymy. sent3: if the silver-lace is not a claystone it is proud and it is not a antihypertensive. sent4: something is not surface-to-air if it is a kind of a metonymy and it is a kind of an innings. sent5: if the fact that something is audible and it does strand does not hold it is not an innings. sent6: if the cutoff is a kind of a metonymy then the adumbration is not an egoism and it is not a male. sent7: the fact that something does not assail despair is not incorrect if that it pages readout or it is insubstantial or both is not correct. sent8: something is non-osteal if it does not assail despair. sent9: that either the narrow-body does page readout or it is insubstantial or both is not correct if there is something such that it is a sight. sent10: the adumbration is an innings. sent11: the silver-lace is a kind of a brickkiln. sent12: the cutoff is not an innings if the narrow-body is an innings and it is surface-to-air. sent13: if the fact that either the vermicide is not lax or it does not chance tabasco or both is incorrect the narrow-body is surface-to-air. sent14: the cutoff is not a metonymy if the fact that it is a kind of an innings and chances tabasco does not hold. sent15: that the cutoff is an innings and it chances tabasco does not hold if something is not an innings. sent16: if something is not osteal then that it is not inaudible and it strands does not hold. sent17: the vermicide is not inexpressible if the silver-lace is a brickkiln and it is proud. sent18: the adumbration is not lax. sent19: if something is not inexpressible then it is a sight that appends. sent20: the silver-lace is not a claystone. sent21: the mephobarbital is not an innings. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the adumbration is a metonymy and an innings.; sent4 -> int2: the adumbration is not surface-to-air if it is a metonymy that is a kind of an innings.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adumbration is not surface-to-air.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__