there exists something such that if it is not a clew it is a kind of modal thing that is discernible.
sent1: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a clew it is not non-modal is not incorrect. sent2: something is a antidiarrheal and it is a napery if it permits submersible. sent3: if the submersible is a modal then it boots bangle and is a kind of a autograft. sent4: something is a kind of a modal and is discernible if it is a clew. sent5: the fact that something is modal and it is discernible if that it is not a clew is true is not false. sent6: there exists something such that if it permits Lydian it is both onomastics and a pall. sent7: the submersible is a kind of modal thing that is discernible if it is a clew. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a clew is correct it is discernible. sent9: there is something such that if it is not biosystematics that it is a kind of a Roth hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a clew then it is a kind of a modal that is discernible.
sent5 -> int1: if the submersible is not a clew then it is a kind of modal thing that is discernible.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a clew it is a kind of modal thing that is discernible. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a clew it is not non-modal is not incorrect. sent2: something is a antidiarrheal and it is a napery if it permits submersible. sent3: if the submersible is a modal then it boots bangle and is a kind of a autograft. sent4: something is a kind of a modal and is discernible if it is a clew. sent5: the fact that something is modal and it is discernible if that it is not a clew is true is not false. sent6: there exists something such that if it permits Lydian it is both onomastics and a pall. sent7: the submersible is a kind of modal thing that is discernible if it is a clew. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a clew is correct it is discernible. sent9: there is something such that if it is not biosystematics that it is a kind of a Roth hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a clew then it is a kind of a modal that is discernible. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the submersible is not a clew then it is a kind of modal thing that is discernible.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__