that if the bacchanal does not occur the blastoporalness does not occur and the finish does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the quiver does not occur. sent2: if the cabaret does not occur then both the non-illegalness and the non-triumphalness occurs. sent3: that the bacchanal occurs prevents that the blastoporalness happens. sent4: that the buying does not occur is not wrong. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the logging skyhook occurs and the finishing happens hold is wrong the finishing does not occur. sent6: that the topiary happens and the canonist happens does not hold. sent7: that the artlessness does not occur and the quiver does not occur is right. sent8: the counterintelligence does not occur and the lettering piccolo does not occur. sent9: the fact that the inopportuneness and the piracy happens is false. sent10: the bureaucraticness does not occur. sent11: that the nonconformistness and the ciliate happens is not true. sent12: the blastoporalness does not occur and the finishing does not occur if the bacchanal occurs. sent13: that that the painfulness and the bar occurs is not right hold. sent14: the incubation does not occur. sent15: that the sacking does not occur hold. sent16: that the resurvey does not occur is caused by that the Frisian does not occur. sent17: that the logging skyhook and the finish occurs is wrong. sent18: the fact that the part and the roar occurs does not hold. sent19: the pentangularness does not occur and the lettering forebrain does not occur. sent20: the fact that the comeback does not occur hold if the lettering oratory does not occur. sent21: the blastoporalness does not occur if the bacchanal does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bacchanal does not occur.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the blastoporalness does not occur hold.; sent5 & sent17 -> int2: the finish does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blastoporalness does not occur and the finish does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the bacchanal does not occur the blastoporalness does not occur and the finish does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the quiver does not occur. sent2: if the cabaret does not occur then both the non-illegalness and the non-triumphalness occurs. sent3: that the bacchanal occurs prevents that the blastoporalness happens. sent4: that the buying does not occur is not wrong. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the logging skyhook occurs and the finishing happens hold is wrong the finishing does not occur. sent6: that the topiary happens and the canonist happens does not hold. sent7: that the artlessness does not occur and the quiver does not occur is right. sent8: the counterintelligence does not occur and the lettering piccolo does not occur. sent9: the fact that the inopportuneness and the piracy happens is false. sent10: the bureaucraticness does not occur. sent11: that the nonconformistness and the ciliate happens is not true. sent12: the blastoporalness does not occur and the finishing does not occur if the bacchanal occurs. sent13: that that the painfulness and the bar occurs is not right hold. sent14: the incubation does not occur. sent15: that the sacking does not occur hold. sent16: that the resurvey does not occur is caused by that the Frisian does not occur. sent17: that the logging skyhook and the finish occurs is wrong. sent18: the fact that the part and the roar occurs does not hold. sent19: the pentangularness does not occur and the lettering forebrain does not occur. sent20: the fact that the comeback does not occur hold if the lettering oratory does not occur. sent21: the blastoporalness does not occur if the bacchanal does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bacchanal does not occur.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the blastoporalness does not occur hold.; sent5 & sent17 -> int2: the finish does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blastoporalness does not occur and the finish does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__