if the repining bullpen occurs then the lexicostatisticsness occurs but the feeling does not occur.
sent1: that the lexicostatisticsness and the feel occurs is triggered by that the stranglehold does not occur. sent2: if the pegging welt does not occur the non-lexicostatisticsness and the feeling occurs. sent3: if the confusing Seward occurs then the immortalness but not the chyliferousness occurs. sent4: the confusing oligodendrocyte and the non-radialness happens. sent5: the actableness occurs. sent6: the lexicostatisticsness occurs if the repining bullpen occurs. sent7: the lexicostatisticsness occurs and the feeling does not occur if the stranglehold does not occur. sent8: the particularisticness happens and/or the documentation happens if the choice does not occur. sent9: the choice does not occur. sent10: the infantileness occurs. sent11: the lexicostatisticsness happens and the feeling occurs. sent12: the infantileness is prevented by that the stranglehold and the repining bullpen occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stranglehold occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the repining bullpen occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the stranglehold occurs and the repining bullpen occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the infantileness does not occur.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the stranglehold does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the lexicostatisticsness but not the feel occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fronting postulation does not occur.
sent8 & sent9 -> int6: the particularisticness and/or the documentation happens.;
$hypothesis$ = if the repining bullpen occurs then the lexicostatisticsness occurs but the feeling does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lexicostatisticsness and the feel occurs is triggered by that the stranglehold does not occur. sent2: if the pegging welt does not occur the non-lexicostatisticsness and the feeling occurs. sent3: if the confusing Seward occurs then the immortalness but not the chyliferousness occurs. sent4: the confusing oligodendrocyte and the non-radialness happens. sent5: the actableness occurs. sent6: the lexicostatisticsness occurs if the repining bullpen occurs. sent7: the lexicostatisticsness occurs and the feeling does not occur if the stranglehold does not occur. sent8: the particularisticness happens and/or the documentation happens if the choice does not occur. sent9: the choice does not occur. sent10: the infantileness occurs. sent11: the lexicostatisticsness happens and the feeling occurs. sent12: the infantileness is prevented by that the stranglehold and the repining bullpen occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stranglehold occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the repining bullpen occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the stranglehold occurs and the repining bullpen occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the infantileness does not occur.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the stranglehold does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the lexicostatisticsness but not the feel occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__