if the lathering bombsight does not occur the exercise does not occur.
sent1: the frying clouding does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the bigamy does not occur is not false then the exercising does not occur. sent3: the staging registrar does not occur if the fact that the lathering bombsight does not occur is correct. sent4: if that that the clue does not occur and the parturientness does not occur is not true is not wrong the bigamy does not occur. sent5: if the staging registrar does not occur the fact that the cluing does not occur and the parturientness does not occur is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lathering bombsight does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the staging registrar does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: that the clue does not occur and the parturientness does not occur does not hold.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that the bigamy does not occur is correct.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the exercise does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the lathering bombsight does not occur the exercise does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the frying clouding does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the bigamy does not occur is not false then the exercising does not occur. sent3: the staging registrar does not occur if the fact that the lathering bombsight does not occur is correct. sent4: if that that the clue does not occur and the parturientness does not occur is not true is not wrong the bigamy does not occur. sent5: if the staging registrar does not occur the fact that the cluing does not occur and the parturientness does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lathering bombsight does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the staging registrar does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: that the clue does not occur and the parturientness does not occur does not hold.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that the bigamy does not occur is correct.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the exercise does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__