if the avulsion occurs not the sibilation but the hopscotch occurs.
sent1: the pedunculateness occurs. sent2: the latterness happens. sent3: that the sparging frugality does not occur is right. sent4: if the airing but not the olfactoriness occurs the sibilation does not occur. sent5: the olfactoriness does not occur. sent6: the transmutation occurs. sent7: the ruggedization does not occur. sent8: the portraiture happens. sent9: if the ruggedization does not occur the speaking paperback happens. sent10: the fact that the ruggedization does not occur and the remount occurs is incorrect if the cancroid does not occur. sent11: that the refrigeration and the speaking DO occurs is triggered by that the incoherentness does not occur. sent12: the trisecting yam does not occur if the Americanism occurs. sent13: if the avulsion occurs then both the air and the non-olfactoryness occurs. sent14: if the speaking steenbok occurs that the opaqueness occurs but the updating antinomy does not occur hold. sent15: if the Burundiness happens then the gift occurs and the systematism does not occur. sent16: that both the non-bioclimaticness and the sparging afterbirth occurs is caused by that the reflection occurs. sent17: not the Hell but the speaking basophil happens. sent18: the glow happens. sent19: the fuss but not the republican happens. sent20: the parcellation happens but the easing does not occur. sent21: the systematism does not occur. sent22: the detraction occurs. sent23: that the hopscotch and the sibilation occurs is caused by that the speaking paperback does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the avulsion happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: both the airing and the non-olfactoriness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the sibilation does not occur.;
the disjunctness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the avulsion occurs not the sibilation but the hopscotch occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the pedunculateness occurs. sent2: the latterness happens. sent3: that the sparging frugality does not occur is right. sent4: if the airing but not the olfactoriness occurs the sibilation does not occur. sent5: the olfactoriness does not occur. sent6: the transmutation occurs. sent7: the ruggedization does not occur. sent8: the portraiture happens. sent9: if the ruggedization does not occur the speaking paperback happens. sent10: the fact that the ruggedization does not occur and the remount occurs is incorrect if the cancroid does not occur. sent11: that the refrigeration and the speaking DO occurs is triggered by that the incoherentness does not occur. sent12: the trisecting yam does not occur if the Americanism occurs. sent13: if the avulsion occurs then both the air and the non-olfactoryness occurs. sent14: if the speaking steenbok occurs that the opaqueness occurs but the updating antinomy does not occur hold. sent15: if the Burundiness happens then the gift occurs and the systematism does not occur. sent16: that both the non-bioclimaticness and the sparging afterbirth occurs is caused by that the reflection occurs. sent17: not the Hell but the speaking basophil happens. sent18: the glow happens. sent19: the fuss but not the republican happens. sent20: the parcellation happens but the easing does not occur. sent21: the systematism does not occur. sent22: the detraction occurs. sent23: that the hopscotch and the sibilation occurs is caused by that the speaking paperback does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the avulsion happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: both the airing and the non-olfactoriness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the sibilation does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__