the bioassay does not occur.
sent1: the conquerableness occurs if the epigastricness occurs. sent2: both the rag and the epigastricness occurs. sent3: the underwriting does not occur. sent4: that the underwriting happens triggers the bioassay. sent5: the spraying refractivity occurs and the scending occurs if the underwriting does not occur. sent6: that the bioassay does not occur is triggered by that both the scending and the conquerableness happens.
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the spraying refractivity happens and the scending occurs.; int1 -> int2: the scending happens.; sent2 -> int3: the epigastricness happens.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the conquerableness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the scending and the conquerableness occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the bioassaying occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the bioassay does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the conquerableness occurs if the epigastricness occurs. sent2: both the rag and the epigastricness occurs. sent3: the underwriting does not occur. sent4: that the underwriting happens triggers the bioassay. sent5: the spraying refractivity occurs and the scending occurs if the underwriting does not occur. sent6: that the bioassay does not occur is triggered by that both the scending and the conquerableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the spraying refractivity happens and the scending occurs.; int1 -> int2: the scending happens.; sent2 -> int3: the epigastricness happens.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the conquerableness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the scending and the conquerableness occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__