the stifler is both not a Limicolae and not unsold.
sent1: the fagot is unsold. sent2: that the azurite is not a kind of an adrenal is not incorrect if the cornstarch is not adrenal and it is not low-tech. sent3: if the gibbon does not activate Alopecurus then that it is a swearer is incorrect. sent4: the gibbon is not a kind of a Limicolae. sent5: the stifler is not a kind of a swearer and is not unsold if there is something such that it activates Alopecurus. sent6: the mercury is mathematical if it excuses saratoga. sent7: if something is a kind of non-Audenesque thing that is not a octavo it is not a swearer. sent8: if something does not activate Alopecurus then that it is not a Limicolae and not unsold is not correct. sent9: the gibbon is sinistral. sent10: the cornstarch is not an adrenal and it is non-low-tech if the mercury is mathematical. sent11: if the azurite is not a swearer that the gibbon activates Alopecurus and is a Tyler is false. sent12: if something activates Alopecurus then the fact that the stifler is not a Limicolae and it is not unsold is true. sent13: the gibbon is a swearer. sent14: the fact that the stifler is not unsold hold. sent15: something is not Audenesque and it is not a kind of a octavo if it is not an adrenal. sent16: the stifler is an improvement. sent17: that the terebinth is non-cyprian if the terebinth is not an odyssey is right. sent18: the stifler is not unsold if there is something such that it does activate Alopecurus. sent19: the rummer is not a Limicolae.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gibbon does not activate Alopecurus.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the gibbon is not a swearer.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the gibbon activates Alopecurus.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does activate Alopecurus.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the stifler is not a kind of a Limicolae and it is not unsold is false.
sent8 -> int5: if the stifler does not activate Alopecurus that it is not a Limicolae and not unsold does not hold.; sent7 -> int6: if the azurite is not Audenesque and it is not a octavo then it is not a swearer.; sent15 -> int7: if the azurite is not adrenal then it is not Audenesque and not a octavo.;
$hypothesis$ = the stifler is both not a Limicolae and not unsold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fagot is unsold. sent2: that the azurite is not a kind of an adrenal is not incorrect if the cornstarch is not adrenal and it is not low-tech. sent3: if the gibbon does not activate Alopecurus then that it is a swearer is incorrect. sent4: the gibbon is not a kind of a Limicolae. sent5: the stifler is not a kind of a swearer and is not unsold if there is something such that it activates Alopecurus. sent6: the mercury is mathematical if it excuses saratoga. sent7: if something is a kind of non-Audenesque thing that is not a octavo it is not a swearer. sent8: if something does not activate Alopecurus then that it is not a Limicolae and not unsold is not correct. sent9: the gibbon is sinistral. sent10: the cornstarch is not an adrenal and it is non-low-tech if the mercury is mathematical. sent11: if the azurite is not a swearer that the gibbon activates Alopecurus and is a Tyler is false. sent12: if something activates Alopecurus then the fact that the stifler is not a Limicolae and it is not unsold is true. sent13: the gibbon is a swearer. sent14: the fact that the stifler is not unsold hold. sent15: something is not Audenesque and it is not a kind of a octavo if it is not an adrenal. sent16: the stifler is an improvement. sent17: that the terebinth is non-cyprian if the terebinth is not an odyssey is right. sent18: the stifler is not unsold if there is something such that it does activate Alopecurus. sent19: the rummer is not a Limicolae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gibbon does not activate Alopecurus.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the gibbon is not a swearer.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the gibbon activates Alopecurus.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does activate Alopecurus.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__