the fact that the puck is a kind of non-Antiguan thing that is not phonetic is not right.
sent1: the palate is a Salamandridae but it is not elfin. sent2: if there is something such that it is an ersatz then the moneygrubber is playful. sent3: if the puck is phonetic then the glossarist is seedy. sent4: if that the palate pleaches Cassiope hold then the glossarist is elfin. sent5: the moneygrubber does not soften and is playful if there is something such that it is a kind of an ersatz. sent6: if the fact that the glossarist does not work cubicity and it is not a typing is false that it is syllabic is correct. sent7: an elfin thing does soften. sent8: something pleaches Cassiope if it is non-seedy thing that softens. sent9: if there is something such that it is a Salamandridae that is not elfin the lantana is a kind of an ersatz. sent10: if something that is not a kind of a Salamandridae is a Anglican it is elfin. sent11: the fact that something is not a Antiguan and it is not phonetic does not hold if it pleaches Cassiope. sent12: if the glossarist pleaches Cassiope the ichthyosaur does soften. sent13: the glossarist pleaches Cassiope if it is seedy. sent14: the puck is a kind of an ersatz but it is not playful if the glossarist is syllabic. sent15: if the puck is an ersatz but it is not playful it is not seedy. sent16: that the fact that the moneygrubber does not soften but it is playful is not wrong is incorrect if the ichthyosaur does soften. sent17: that the fact that the glossarist is non-seedy does not hold hold if that the puck is not a kind of a Antiguan and is not phonetic is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the puck is not a Antiguan and it is not phonetic is false.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the glossarist is seedy.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the glossarist does pleach Cassiope.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the ichthyosaur softens.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: that the moneygrubber does not soften and is not unplayful is incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: there is something such that it is a Salamandridae that is not elfin.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the lantana is an ersatz.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is an ersatz.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the moneygrubber does not soften and is playful.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the puck is non-Antiguan but not phonetic does not hold.
sent11 -> int10: the fact that the puck is not a Antiguan and is not phonetic is not correct if it pleaches Cassiope.; sent8 -> int11: if the puck is a kind of non-seedy thing that does soften then it does pleach Cassiope.; sent7 -> int12: the puck does soften if it is elfin.; sent10 -> int13: the puck is elfin if it is not a Salamandridae and is Anglican.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the puck is a kind of non-Antiguan thing that is not phonetic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the palate is a Salamandridae but it is not elfin. sent2: if there is something such that it is an ersatz then the moneygrubber is playful. sent3: if the puck is phonetic then the glossarist is seedy. sent4: if that the palate pleaches Cassiope hold then the glossarist is elfin. sent5: the moneygrubber does not soften and is playful if there is something such that it is a kind of an ersatz. sent6: if the fact that the glossarist does not work cubicity and it is not a typing is false that it is syllabic is correct. sent7: an elfin thing does soften. sent8: something pleaches Cassiope if it is non-seedy thing that softens. sent9: if there is something such that it is a Salamandridae that is not elfin the lantana is a kind of an ersatz. sent10: if something that is not a kind of a Salamandridae is a Anglican it is elfin. sent11: the fact that something is not a Antiguan and it is not phonetic does not hold if it pleaches Cassiope. sent12: if the glossarist pleaches Cassiope the ichthyosaur does soften. sent13: the glossarist pleaches Cassiope if it is seedy. sent14: the puck is a kind of an ersatz but it is not playful if the glossarist is syllabic. sent15: if the puck is an ersatz but it is not playful it is not seedy. sent16: that the fact that the moneygrubber does not soften but it is playful is not wrong is incorrect if the ichthyosaur does soften. sent17: that the fact that the glossarist is non-seedy does not hold hold if that the puck is not a kind of a Antiguan and is not phonetic is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the puck is not a Antiguan and it is not phonetic is false.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the glossarist is seedy.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the glossarist does pleach Cassiope.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the ichthyosaur softens.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: that the moneygrubber does not soften and is not unplayful is incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: there is something such that it is a Salamandridae that is not elfin.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the lantana is an ersatz.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is an ersatz.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the moneygrubber does not soften and is playful.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__