the fact that the proposing Niagara but not the accrediting adoxography happens does not hold.
sent1: if the detraining and the riot occurs the filling Anabantidae does not occur. sent2: the filling Anabantidae happens and the accrediting adjutant occurs. sent3: the debacle does not occur. sent4: that the transfusing Radhakrishnan but not the accrediting anatomical happens brings about that the evangelism does not occur. sent5: if the proposing Niagara does not occur the riot and the filling Anabantidae occurs. sent6: that the art does not occur and the evangelism does not occur yields the non-loudness. sent7: the accrediting adjutant does not occur and the cryptogamicness does not occur if the accrediting uterus occurs. sent8: the driedness and the filling Anhingidae happens if the nonastringentness does not occur. sent9: if the accrediting adjutant does not occur then that the rioting does not occur and the filling Anabantidae happens is not right. sent10: the fact that the proposing Niagara happens is correct if the rioting does not occur. sent11: if the accrediting uterus does not occur then both the cryptogamicness and the accrediting adjutant happens. sent12: the accrediting adjutant occurs. sent13: the runaway happens and the accrediting forewoman does not occur. sent14: if that the fact that not the riot but the filling Anabantidae happens is false is true then the fact that the calculation occurs is right. sent15: if the debacle does not occur then the beckoning does not occur but the climbing occurs. sent16: the proposing Niagara but not the accrediting adoxography happens if the riot does not occur. sent17: if the chin does not occur and the hecatomb does not occur then the art does not occur. sent18: that the beckoning does not occur leads to that the chin does not occur and the hecatomb does not occur. sent19: if the loudness does not occur then the accrediting uterus happens and the transfusing poltergeist occurs. sent20: both the detraining and the calculation happens. sent21: the fact that the proposing Niagara happens and the accrediting adoxography does not occur is incorrect if the detraining does not occur. sent22: the runaway and the detraining occurs if the calculation does not occur. sent23: the transfusing Radhakrishnan but not the accrediting anatomical occurs if the dried occurs. sent24: if that not the Appalachian but the Lens happens is wrong the nonastringentness does not occur.
sent20 -> int1: the detraining happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rioting happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the detraining and the riot happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the filling Anabantidae does not occur.; sent2 -> int4: the filling Anabantidae occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the rioting does not occur.; int6 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the runaway occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the proposing Niagara but not the accrediting adoxography happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the detraining and the riot occurs the filling Anabantidae does not occur. sent2: the filling Anabantidae happens and the accrediting adjutant occurs. sent3: the debacle does not occur. sent4: that the transfusing Radhakrishnan but not the accrediting anatomical happens brings about that the evangelism does not occur. sent5: if the proposing Niagara does not occur the riot and the filling Anabantidae occurs. sent6: that the art does not occur and the evangelism does not occur yields the non-loudness. sent7: the accrediting adjutant does not occur and the cryptogamicness does not occur if the accrediting uterus occurs. sent8: the driedness and the filling Anhingidae happens if the nonastringentness does not occur. sent9: if the accrediting adjutant does not occur then that the rioting does not occur and the filling Anabantidae happens is not right. sent10: the fact that the proposing Niagara happens is correct if the rioting does not occur. sent11: if the accrediting uterus does not occur then both the cryptogamicness and the accrediting adjutant happens. sent12: the accrediting adjutant occurs. sent13: the runaway happens and the accrediting forewoman does not occur. sent14: if that the fact that not the riot but the filling Anabantidae happens is false is true then the fact that the calculation occurs is right. sent15: if the debacle does not occur then the beckoning does not occur but the climbing occurs. sent16: the proposing Niagara but not the accrediting adoxography happens if the riot does not occur. sent17: if the chin does not occur and the hecatomb does not occur then the art does not occur. sent18: that the beckoning does not occur leads to that the chin does not occur and the hecatomb does not occur. sent19: if the loudness does not occur then the accrediting uterus happens and the transfusing poltergeist occurs. sent20: both the detraining and the calculation happens. sent21: the fact that the proposing Niagara happens and the accrediting adoxography does not occur is incorrect if the detraining does not occur. sent22: the runaway and the detraining occurs if the calculation does not occur. sent23: the transfusing Radhakrishnan but not the accrediting anatomical occurs if the dried occurs. sent24: if that not the Appalachian but the Lens happens is wrong the nonastringentness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the detraining happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rioting happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the detraining and the riot happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the filling Anabantidae does not occur.; sent2 -> int4: the filling Anabantidae occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the rioting does not occur.; int6 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__