the bespoting development occurs.
sent1: if the ennoblement does not occur then the repositing mediacy does not occur. sent2: the repositing mediacy happens. sent3: if the mucosalness happens then the airmailing occurs and/or the ennoblement does not occur. sent4: if the pivoting occurs the amoebicness occurs. sent5: the sweeping does not occur if both the non-mucosalness and the endocrine occurs. sent6: the amoebicness does not occur if the pivot does not occur and the flowing does not occur. sent7: that the repositing mediacy does not occur is triggered by the airmail. sent8: if the fact that the amoebicness occurs and the sweeping does not occur is correct the bespoting development does not occur. sent9: the amoebicness happens if the flow happens. sent10: the flowing occurs or the pivoting occurs or both if the horripilating areola does not occur. sent11: the horripilating areola does not occur. sent12: the endocrine happens. sent13: the repositing mediacy does not occur or the mucosalness does not occur or both if the endocrineness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the mucosalness occurs is not wrong.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: either the airmail occurs or the ennoblement does not occur or both.; int1 & sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the repositing mediacy does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the mucosalness does not occur.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the mucosalness does not occur but the endocrine happens.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the sweeping does not occur.; sent10 & sent11 -> int7: the flow and/or the pivoting occurs.; int7 & sent9 & sent4 -> int8: that the amoebicness happens hold.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the amoebicness occurs and the sweeping does not occur.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bespoting development occurs is true.
$hypothesis$ = the bespoting development occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ennoblement does not occur then the repositing mediacy does not occur. sent2: the repositing mediacy happens. sent3: if the mucosalness happens then the airmailing occurs and/or the ennoblement does not occur. sent4: if the pivoting occurs the amoebicness occurs. sent5: the sweeping does not occur if both the non-mucosalness and the endocrine occurs. sent6: the amoebicness does not occur if the pivot does not occur and the flowing does not occur. sent7: that the repositing mediacy does not occur is triggered by the airmail. sent8: if the fact that the amoebicness occurs and the sweeping does not occur is correct the bespoting development does not occur. sent9: the amoebicness happens if the flow happens. sent10: the flowing occurs or the pivoting occurs or both if the horripilating areola does not occur. sent11: the horripilating areola does not occur. sent12: the endocrine happens. sent13: the repositing mediacy does not occur or the mucosalness does not occur or both if the endocrineness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the mucosalness occurs is not wrong.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: either the airmail occurs or the ennoblement does not occur or both.; int1 & sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the repositing mediacy does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the mucosalness does not occur.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the mucosalness does not occur but the endocrine happens.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the sweeping does not occur.; sent10 & sent11 -> int7: the flow and/or the pivoting occurs.; int7 & sent9 & sent4 -> int8: that the amoebicness happens hold.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the amoebicness occurs and the sweeping does not occur.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__