the applicator does not hunger disjointedness.
sent1: if the characin is not a relegation then the hatmaker is a deliverable. sent2: everything is not pretentious and/or is a panache. sent3: if something is unpretentious or a panache or both then the fact that it does not burglarize Bigfoot is correct. sent4: if something that is not a relegation is a deliverable then the applicator does hunger disjointedness. sent5: the nephoscope is a Warhol if the spectroscope is not pretentious and it is not Peloponnesian. sent6: if something is not pretentious it does not burglarize Bigfoot. sent7: the applicator is not a sigeh. sent8: if the fact that the spectroscope is Peloponnesian is not false the characin is not a relegation. sent9: if the spectroscope is a Warhol but it is not a kind of a seaward the nephoscope does burglarize Bigfoot. sent10: if the hatmaker is not a relegation and does not burglarize Bigfoot then that the nephoscope is a deliverable is correct. sent11: if the spectroscope is not a Warhol and is not a seaward the nephoscope does burglarize Bigfoot. sent12: everything does not hunger disjointedness or it is a kind of a seaward or both. sent13: if the applicator is not a kind of a panache the nephoscope is not a panache but it does hunger disjointedness. sent14: the fact that the spectroscope is not a Warhol is not false if it is not Peloponnesian. sent15: there exists something such that it is a deliverable. sent16: the hatmaker is a kind of a deliverable. sent17: everything is non-Peloponnesian and/or seaward. sent18: the nephoscope does not burglarize Bigfoot if that it is not pretentious hold. sent19: something is a relegation and deliverable. sent20: there exists something such that it is not a relegation. sent21: the nephoscope is not unpretentious and/or is a panache. sent22: the hatmaker is not a relegation but a deliverable if the characin is not a relegation. sent23: if the fact that the spectroscope is not Peloponnesian hold it is not a kind of a Warhol and is not seaward. sent24: the fact that something is Peloponnesian and it does burglarize Bigfoot does not hold if it is not a relegation. sent25: everything either is pretentious or is a panache or both. sent26: the spectroscope is not a Warhol. sent27: if the spectroscope is a kind of a deliverable the hatmaker is not seaward.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the spectroscope is not Peloponnesian hold.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the spectroscope is not a Warhol and is not a kind of a seaward.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the nephoscope burglarizes Bigfoot.; sent3 -> int3: the nephoscope does not burglarize Bigfoot if it is not pretentious and/or is a panache.; sent2 -> int4: the nephoscope is either unpretentious or a panache or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the nephoscope does not burglarize Bigfoot.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the spectroscope is Peloponnesian.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the characin is not a relegation.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the hatmaker is not a relegation but it is deliverable.; int9 -> int10: something is not a kind of a relegation but it is a deliverable.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the pigfish is not a kind of a Warhol.
sent24 -> int11: if the spectroscope is not a relegation then the fact that it is Peloponnesian and burglarizes Bigfoot is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the applicator does not hunger disjointedness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the characin is not a relegation then the hatmaker is a deliverable. sent2: everything is not pretentious and/or is a panache. sent3: if something is unpretentious or a panache or both then the fact that it does not burglarize Bigfoot is correct. sent4: if something that is not a relegation is a deliverable then the applicator does hunger disjointedness. sent5: the nephoscope is a Warhol if the spectroscope is not pretentious and it is not Peloponnesian. sent6: if something is not pretentious it does not burglarize Bigfoot. sent7: the applicator is not a sigeh. sent8: if the fact that the spectroscope is Peloponnesian is not false the characin is not a relegation. sent9: if the spectroscope is a Warhol but it is not a kind of a seaward the nephoscope does burglarize Bigfoot. sent10: if the hatmaker is not a relegation and does not burglarize Bigfoot then that the nephoscope is a deliverable is correct. sent11: if the spectroscope is not a Warhol and is not a seaward the nephoscope does burglarize Bigfoot. sent12: everything does not hunger disjointedness or it is a kind of a seaward or both. sent13: if the applicator is not a kind of a panache the nephoscope is not a panache but it does hunger disjointedness. sent14: the fact that the spectroscope is not a Warhol is not false if it is not Peloponnesian. sent15: there exists something such that it is a deliverable. sent16: the hatmaker is a kind of a deliverable. sent17: everything is non-Peloponnesian and/or seaward. sent18: the nephoscope does not burglarize Bigfoot if that it is not pretentious hold. sent19: something is a relegation and deliverable. sent20: there exists something such that it is not a relegation. sent21: the nephoscope is not unpretentious and/or is a panache. sent22: the hatmaker is not a relegation but a deliverable if the characin is not a relegation. sent23: if the fact that the spectroscope is not Peloponnesian hold it is not a kind of a Warhol and is not seaward. sent24: the fact that something is Peloponnesian and it does burglarize Bigfoot does not hold if it is not a relegation. sent25: everything either is pretentious or is a panache or both. sent26: the spectroscope is not a Warhol. sent27: if the spectroscope is a kind of a deliverable the hatmaker is not seaward. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the spectroscope is not Peloponnesian hold.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the spectroscope is not a Warhol and is not a kind of a seaward.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the nephoscope burglarizes Bigfoot.; sent3 -> int3: the nephoscope does not burglarize Bigfoot if it is not pretentious and/or is a panache.; sent2 -> int4: the nephoscope is either unpretentious or a panache or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the nephoscope does not burglarize Bigfoot.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the spectroscope is Peloponnesian.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the characin is not a relegation.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the hatmaker is not a relegation but it is deliverable.; int9 -> int10: something is not a kind of a relegation but it is a deliverable.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__