the fact that the divaricating Niebuhr but not the transforming occurs is false.
sent1: the algoidness does not occur if that the fact that the bicker does not occur and the Ruritanian does not occur is not incorrect does not hold. sent2: the sublimation does not occur. sent3: that the throbbing does not occur is prevented by that the censusing does not occur. sent4: that the remission occurs hold. sent5: the fact that the nelson does not occur is true. sent6: that the challenge but not the monitoring happens does not hold if the librarianship happens. sent7: the denigration is prevented by that the transforming or the truckage or both occurs. sent8: the scumble does not occur. sent9: that the librarianship does not occur and the challenging does not occur is wrong if the denigration does not occur. sent10: if the turfing status does not occur the monitoring and the birefringence happens. sent11: the flattening erethism happens. sent12: the fact that the prickling happens and the grapevine happens is not wrong. sent13: the technology does not occur. sent14: the parliament does not occur if the Requiem occurs or the convecting occurs or both. sent15: if the birefringence does not occur then the divaricating Niebuhr happens or the monitoring does not occur or both. sent16: the monitoring does not occur if the fact that the librarianship does not occur and the challenge does not occur does not hold. sent17: the unfruitfulness does not occur. sent18: that the part-timeness does not occur is not incorrect. sent19: that the transforming happens but the truckage does not occur triggers the non-inflectionalness. sent20: the confiscation happens and/or the throbbing occurs. sent21: the processing does not occur and the entertainment does not occur. sent22: if the fact that the fact that the challenging but not the monitoring occurs is not incorrect is wrong then the challenging does not occur. sent23: the turfing R-2 does not occur. sent24: if the technology does not occur then the logisticness occurs and the divaricating Niebuhr occurs. sent25: if not the truckage but the transforming happens the expelling does not occur. sent26: that not the librarianship but the challenge occurs is not correct if the denigration does not occur. sent27: the turfing status does not occur and the retailing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transforming occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the transforming occurs and/or the truckage occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the denigration does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the librarianship does not occur and the challenge does not occur is wrong.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the monitoring does not occur.; sent27 -> int5: the turfing status does not occur.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the monitoring and the birefringence occurs.; int6 -> int7: the monitoring happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the transforming does not occur.; sent24 & sent13 -> int10: the logisticness and the divaricating Niebuhr happens.; int10 -> int11: the divaricating Niebuhr occurs.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the expelling does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the divaricating Niebuhr but not the transforming occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the algoidness does not occur if that the fact that the bicker does not occur and the Ruritanian does not occur is not incorrect does not hold. sent2: the sublimation does not occur. sent3: that the throbbing does not occur is prevented by that the censusing does not occur. sent4: that the remission occurs hold. sent5: the fact that the nelson does not occur is true. sent6: that the challenge but not the monitoring happens does not hold if the librarianship happens. sent7: the denigration is prevented by that the transforming or the truckage or both occurs. sent8: the scumble does not occur. sent9: that the librarianship does not occur and the challenging does not occur is wrong if the denigration does not occur. sent10: if the turfing status does not occur the monitoring and the birefringence happens. sent11: the flattening erethism happens. sent12: the fact that the prickling happens and the grapevine happens is not wrong. sent13: the technology does not occur. sent14: the parliament does not occur if the Requiem occurs or the convecting occurs or both. sent15: if the birefringence does not occur then the divaricating Niebuhr happens or the monitoring does not occur or both. sent16: the monitoring does not occur if the fact that the librarianship does not occur and the challenge does not occur does not hold. sent17: the unfruitfulness does not occur. sent18: that the part-timeness does not occur is not incorrect. sent19: that the transforming happens but the truckage does not occur triggers the non-inflectionalness. sent20: the confiscation happens and/or the throbbing occurs. sent21: the processing does not occur and the entertainment does not occur. sent22: if the fact that the fact that the challenging but not the monitoring occurs is not incorrect is wrong then the challenging does not occur. sent23: the turfing R-2 does not occur. sent24: if the technology does not occur then the logisticness occurs and the divaricating Niebuhr occurs. sent25: if not the truckage but the transforming happens the expelling does not occur. sent26: that not the librarianship but the challenge occurs is not correct if the denigration does not occur. sent27: the turfing status does not occur and the retailing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transforming occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the transforming occurs and/or the truckage occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the denigration does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the librarianship does not occur and the challenge does not occur is wrong.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the monitoring does not occur.; sent27 -> int5: the turfing status does not occur.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the monitoring and the birefringence occurs.; int6 -> int7: the monitoring happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the transforming does not occur.; sent24 & sent13 -> int10: the logisticness and the divaricating Niebuhr happens.; int10 -> int11: the divaricating Niebuhr occurs.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__