the antioxidant is not clement.
sent1: there is something such that it is pneumatic. sent2: the fact that the skyscraper is non-genealogic but it is a domain does not hold. sent3: if something is not a kind of a zinnwaldite then it is clement. sent4: if something is not irreverent or it is azo or both the basidiocarp is not irreverent. sent5: if that the goosefoot is a kind of a pantheist is right the antioxidant is not clement. sent6: if the skyscraper is genealogic then it is not irreverent. sent7: the antioxidant is not clement if the goosefoot is a Lactarius and/or a pantheist. sent8: a astigmatic thing is a Lactarius. sent9: if something is not azo or does result inspissation or both the fact that the oxeye is a southeast is not false. sent10: if the skyscraper is not irreverent the turtleneck either is not azo or does result inspissation or both. sent11: if there is something such that it does not wake photosensitivity then the turtleneck is not a zinnwaldite. sent12: if the fact that the skyscraper is not irreverent but it is a kind of a Lactarius does not hold then it is not clement. sent13: the fact that something is azo or does result inspissation or both is true. sent14: the turtleneck is azo and/or it results inspissation if the skyscraper is not irreverent. sent15: something is clement if it does result inspissation. sent16: if there are pneumatic things the oxeye does not wake photosensitivity. sent17: if the fact that the oxeye is non-azo thing that is clement does not hold then the fact that it is not a southeast is not wrong. sent18: the antioxidant is genealogic. sent19: the skyscraper is not a southeast if the fact that that the turtleneck is non-astigmatic thing that is not a kind of a Lactarius is wrong is right. sent20: the fact that something is not astigmatic and not a Lactarius is not correct if it is clement. sent21: the skyscraper is not irreverent if the fact that it is a kind of non-genealogic thing that is a domain is false. sent22: if something is not a kind of a southeast then it is not irreverent and/or is azo.
sent21 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the skyscraper is not irreverent is true.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the turtleneck is not azo or it does result inspissation or both.; int2 -> int3: something is not azo and/or does result inspissation.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the oxeye is a southeast.; sent8 -> int5: if the goosefoot is astigmatic it is a Lactarius.;
the antioxidant is clement.
sent15 -> int6: the antioxidant is clement if that it results inspissation is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the antioxidant is not clement. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is pneumatic. sent2: the fact that the skyscraper is non-genealogic but it is a domain does not hold. sent3: if something is not a kind of a zinnwaldite then it is clement. sent4: if something is not irreverent or it is azo or both the basidiocarp is not irreverent. sent5: if that the goosefoot is a kind of a pantheist is right the antioxidant is not clement. sent6: if the skyscraper is genealogic then it is not irreverent. sent7: the antioxidant is not clement if the goosefoot is a Lactarius and/or a pantheist. sent8: a astigmatic thing is a Lactarius. sent9: if something is not azo or does result inspissation or both the fact that the oxeye is a southeast is not false. sent10: if the skyscraper is not irreverent the turtleneck either is not azo or does result inspissation or both. sent11: if there is something such that it does not wake photosensitivity then the turtleneck is not a zinnwaldite. sent12: if the fact that the skyscraper is not irreverent but it is a kind of a Lactarius does not hold then it is not clement. sent13: the fact that something is azo or does result inspissation or both is true. sent14: the turtleneck is azo and/or it results inspissation if the skyscraper is not irreverent. sent15: something is clement if it does result inspissation. sent16: if there are pneumatic things the oxeye does not wake photosensitivity. sent17: if the fact that the oxeye is non-azo thing that is clement does not hold then the fact that it is not a southeast is not wrong. sent18: the antioxidant is genealogic. sent19: the skyscraper is not a southeast if the fact that that the turtleneck is non-astigmatic thing that is not a kind of a Lactarius is wrong is right. sent20: the fact that something is not astigmatic and not a Lactarius is not correct if it is clement. sent21: the skyscraper is not irreverent if the fact that it is a kind of non-genealogic thing that is a domain is false. sent22: if something is not a kind of a southeast then it is not irreverent and/or is azo. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the skyscraper is not irreverent is true.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the turtleneck is not azo or it does result inspissation or both.; int2 -> int3: something is not azo and/or does result inspissation.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the oxeye is a southeast.; sent8 -> int5: if the goosefoot is astigmatic it is a Lactarius.; __UNKNOWN__