either the Down meshes Down or it is not muciferous or both.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it either is ammonitic or is mass-spectrometric or both is not correct then the narcissist does not show. sent2: if the narcissist is not a show the fact that the bourbon does not monetize voider and does mesh Down does not hold. sent3: something does mesh Down or it is not muciferous or both if it is not a nautch. sent4: if the Down is not a cobble that it is a kind of a oilskin or it is not abient or both is incorrect. sent5: that the Down is a nautch but it is not muciferous is not right if the bourbon is not a cobble. sent6: the Down is not a cobble. sent7: the fact that the fact that either the pyelogram is ammonitic or it is mass-spectrometric or both does not hold is not wrong. sent8: if the fact that something is a oilskin and/or it is not abient is not right that it is not a nautch hold. sent9: something does not mesh Down if that it does not monetize voider and it does mesh Down does not hold.
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Down is a oilskin or not abient or both is false.; sent8 -> int2: if the fact that the Down is a oilskin and/or it is not abient is false it is not a nautch.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Down is not a kind of a nautch.; sent3 -> int4: if the Down is not a nautch it does mesh Down and/or is not muciferous.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the voider is not a nautch.
sent9 -> int5: the bourbon does not mesh Down if the fact that it does not monetize voider and mesh Down does not hold.; sent7 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is ammonitic and/or it is mass-spectrometric is wrong.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the narcissist is not a show.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: that the bourbon does not monetize voider but it does mesh Down is wrong.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the bourbon does not mesh Down.;
$hypothesis$ = either the Down meshes Down or it is not muciferous or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it either is ammonitic or is mass-spectrometric or both is not correct then the narcissist does not show. sent2: if the narcissist is not a show the fact that the bourbon does not monetize voider and does mesh Down does not hold. sent3: something does mesh Down or it is not muciferous or both if it is not a nautch. sent4: if the Down is not a cobble that it is a kind of a oilskin or it is not abient or both is incorrect. sent5: that the Down is a nautch but it is not muciferous is not right if the bourbon is not a cobble. sent6: the Down is not a cobble. sent7: the fact that the fact that either the pyelogram is ammonitic or it is mass-spectrometric or both does not hold is not wrong. sent8: if the fact that something is a oilskin and/or it is not abient is not right that it is not a nautch hold. sent9: something does not mesh Down if that it does not monetize voider and it does mesh Down does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Down is a oilskin or not abient or both is false.; sent8 -> int2: if the fact that the Down is a oilskin and/or it is not abient is false it is not a nautch.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Down is not a kind of a nautch.; sent3 -> int4: if the Down is not a nautch it does mesh Down and/or is not muciferous.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__