that the fact that if the trigger is non-accordant then the fact that the coydog is not sublingual and it is not a four-pounder is not true is right does not hold.
sent1: the coydog is accordant if it is sublingual thing that is not thirsty. sent2: something is sublingual if it is not thirsty and it is not a four-pounder. sent3: something is accordant if it is not thirsty and it is not a kind of a Malmo. sent4: the coydog is not a collateral and it is not sublingual. sent5: if the coydog is not a kind of a four-pounder then that the trigger is both not a four-pounder and accordant does not hold. sent6: the trigger is not a kind of an ala. sent7: if the trigger is sublingual it is not thirsty. sent8: the coydog is a Malmo if it is a four-pounder and it is not accordant. sent9: the coydog is both not sublingual and non-thirsty if that the trigger is not a kind of a four-pounder is correct. sent10: the coydog is not a kind of a Patwin and it is not playable. sent11: if something is peroneal then it is not a Austronesian and it is not a Malmo. sent12: if something that is not a kind of a Malmo is not a four-pounder then it is accordant. sent13: if the trigger is not sublingual the fact that the coydog is not sublingual and it is not a four-pounder is not true. sent14: the trigger is non-thirsty and is not a kind of a Malmo if it is sublingual. sent15: if the trigger is not accordant then that the coydog is sublingual thing that is not a kind of a four-pounder is not true. sent16: the coydog is not sublingual and it is not a four-pounder. sent17: the fact that the coydog is non-sublingual thing that is a kind of a four-pounder is incorrect. sent18: that the trigger is a kind of an rpm is right. sent19: the coydog is both not flimsy and not a four-pounder. sent20: something is a four-pounder if it is not accordant and it is not thirsty.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trigger is sublingual.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the trigger is non-thirsty thing that is not a Malmo is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: that the trigger is accordant is true if it is not thirsty and not a Malmo.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trigger is accordant.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the trigger is not accordant.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the trigger is not sublingual.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: that the coydog is not sublingual and it is not a four-pounder is false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the nitrazepam is not a Austronesian and not a Malmo is right if it is peroneal.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that if the trigger is non-accordant then the fact that the coydog is not sublingual and it is not a four-pounder is not true is right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the coydog is accordant if it is sublingual thing that is not thirsty. sent2: something is sublingual if it is not thirsty and it is not a four-pounder. sent3: something is accordant if it is not thirsty and it is not a kind of a Malmo. sent4: the coydog is not a collateral and it is not sublingual. sent5: if the coydog is not a kind of a four-pounder then that the trigger is both not a four-pounder and accordant does not hold. sent6: the trigger is not a kind of an ala. sent7: if the trigger is sublingual it is not thirsty. sent8: the coydog is a Malmo if it is a four-pounder and it is not accordant. sent9: the coydog is both not sublingual and non-thirsty if that the trigger is not a kind of a four-pounder is correct. sent10: the coydog is not a kind of a Patwin and it is not playable. sent11: if something is peroneal then it is not a Austronesian and it is not a Malmo. sent12: if something that is not a kind of a Malmo is not a four-pounder then it is accordant. sent13: if the trigger is not sublingual the fact that the coydog is not sublingual and it is not a four-pounder is not true. sent14: the trigger is non-thirsty and is not a kind of a Malmo if it is sublingual. sent15: if the trigger is not accordant then that the coydog is sublingual thing that is not a kind of a four-pounder is not true. sent16: the coydog is not sublingual and it is not a four-pounder. sent17: the fact that the coydog is non-sublingual thing that is a kind of a four-pounder is incorrect. sent18: that the trigger is a kind of an rpm is right. sent19: the coydog is both not flimsy and not a four-pounder. sent20: something is a four-pounder if it is not accordant and it is not thirsty. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trigger is sublingual.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the trigger is non-thirsty thing that is not a Malmo is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: that the trigger is accordant is true if it is not thirsty and not a Malmo.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trigger is accordant.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the trigger is not accordant.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the trigger is not sublingual.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: that the coydog is not sublingual and it is not a four-pounder is false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__