the Vernier is not daisylike.
sent1: if the cutch is not quadrangular it is a Prussian and does not rustle nitrogenase. sent2: if the pawn is not angiomatous that that the cutch is not angiomatous and it does not weld shoebill does not hold is not incorrect. sent3: if that the shoebill does not rustle nitrogenase but it is chlamydial is false it does rustle nitrogenase. sent4: the turbogenerator does not rustle nitrogenase. sent5: the singlet is not operable and is chlamydial if something is endocentric. sent6: the cutch is not quadrangular if that the beaker does not weld shoebill is not incorrect. sent7: the singlet is not a unpleasingness if the turbogenerator is not a kind of a skidder but it is a Hanoverian. sent8: if that something rustles nitrogenase and it is a kind of a unpleasingness does not hold that it does not weld shoebill hold. sent9: the voicer is not a kind of a company. sent10: the beaker is not a kind of a Prussian if the singlet is not a unpleasingness. sent11: that the cutch is a kind of a skidder but it does not weld shoebill is false if it is not Hanoverian. sent12: that the shoebill does not rustle nitrogenase and is chlamydial is incorrect. sent13: the fact that something rustles nitrogenase and does not weld shoebill is not true if it is not a unpleasingness. sent14: if something is not angiomatous the fact that it does not crowd and it is a Rayleigh does not hold. sent15: if the shoebill is not non-quadrangular the fact that the cutch is not non-quadrangular is not false. sent16: the Vernier is not daisylike if that the fact that the beaker is both calico and non-quadrangular does not hold is right. sent17: if something is not a kind of a Prussian then the fact that it is a calico and is not quadrangular does not hold. sent18: if the singlet is not operable the shoebill is quadrangular and it is calico. sent19: if the voicer is not a company then that it does reimburse Mustela and does not destain struggling is not true. sent20: the shoebill does not rustle nitrogenase if the fact that that the cutch is non-angiomatous thing that does not weld shoebill hold is incorrect. sent21: the singlet is not daisylike. sent22: if the pawn does not weld shoebill then the Vernier is daisylike and it is not non-angiomatous. sent23: the singlet is not Hanoverian if the Vernier is daisylike and it is a unpleasingness. sent24: if the shoebill is not a unpleasingness the fact that it rustles nitrogenase and it is not a Prussian is false. sent25: the beaker is endocentric if the fact that the voicer does reimburse Mustela and does not destain struggling is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the turbogenerator is not a skidder but a Hanoverian does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a skidder and not non-Hanoverian does not hold.; sent3 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the shoebill does rustle nitrogenase hold.; sent17 -> int3: if the beaker is not a Prussian that it is a calico and it is not quadrangular is wrong.;
that the fact that the airway is not a crowding but a Rayleigh is not wrong is not true.
sent14 -> int4: if the airway is not angiomatous that it does not crowd and it is a Rayleigh is not correct.; sent13 -> int5: if the pawn is not a unpleasingness the fact that it does rustle nitrogenase and it does not weld shoebill is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the Vernier is not daisylike. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cutch is not quadrangular it is a Prussian and does not rustle nitrogenase. sent2: if the pawn is not angiomatous that that the cutch is not angiomatous and it does not weld shoebill does not hold is not incorrect. sent3: if that the shoebill does not rustle nitrogenase but it is chlamydial is false it does rustle nitrogenase. sent4: the turbogenerator does not rustle nitrogenase. sent5: the singlet is not operable and is chlamydial if something is endocentric. sent6: the cutch is not quadrangular if that the beaker does not weld shoebill is not incorrect. sent7: the singlet is not a unpleasingness if the turbogenerator is not a kind of a skidder but it is a Hanoverian. sent8: if that something rustles nitrogenase and it is a kind of a unpleasingness does not hold that it does not weld shoebill hold. sent9: the voicer is not a kind of a company. sent10: the beaker is not a kind of a Prussian if the singlet is not a unpleasingness. sent11: that the cutch is a kind of a skidder but it does not weld shoebill is false if it is not Hanoverian. sent12: that the shoebill does not rustle nitrogenase and is chlamydial is incorrect. sent13: the fact that something rustles nitrogenase and does not weld shoebill is not true if it is not a unpleasingness. sent14: if something is not angiomatous the fact that it does not crowd and it is a Rayleigh does not hold. sent15: if the shoebill is not non-quadrangular the fact that the cutch is not non-quadrangular is not false. sent16: the Vernier is not daisylike if that the fact that the beaker is both calico and non-quadrangular does not hold is right. sent17: if something is not a kind of a Prussian then the fact that it is a calico and is not quadrangular does not hold. sent18: if the singlet is not operable the shoebill is quadrangular and it is calico. sent19: if the voicer is not a company then that it does reimburse Mustela and does not destain struggling is not true. sent20: the shoebill does not rustle nitrogenase if the fact that that the cutch is non-angiomatous thing that does not weld shoebill hold is incorrect. sent21: the singlet is not daisylike. sent22: if the pawn does not weld shoebill then the Vernier is daisylike and it is not non-angiomatous. sent23: the singlet is not Hanoverian if the Vernier is daisylike and it is a unpleasingness. sent24: if the shoebill is not a unpleasingness the fact that it rustles nitrogenase and it is not a Prussian is false. sent25: the beaker is endocentric if the fact that the voicer does reimburse Mustela and does not destain struggling is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the turbogenerator is not a skidder but a Hanoverian does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a skidder and not non-Hanoverian does not hold.; sent3 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the shoebill does rustle nitrogenase hold.; sent17 -> int3: if the beaker is not a Prussian that it is a calico and it is not quadrangular is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__