the crutch does foal exenteration.
sent1: if the crutch is not legible then the fact that the wake is masochistic and it does foal exenteration is not correct. sent2: the crutch is not masochistic if it is not a kind of a cling or it is legible or both. sent3: the tepal is not crosswise and does not sterilize Service. sent4: if the crutch is not a cling it is not masochistic. sent5: the crutch is crosswise if the HAZMAT does not gossip but it is a subsumption. sent6: the freeze is not masochistic. sent7: if something that is not crosswise does not sterilize Service the HAZMAT does not cling. sent8: the crutch is a cling or not illegible or both. sent9: that the crutch does not cling or is legible or both is true. sent10: the crutch is masochistic if it does not foal exenteration. sent11: if something is not non-crosswise and it does sterilize Service then it is not legible.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crutch does not foal exenteration.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the crutch is masochistic.; sent2 & sent9 -> int2: the crutch is non-masochistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the crutch does not foal exenteration.
sent3 -> int4: something is a kind of non-crosswise thing that does not sterilize Service.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the HAZMAT is not a cling.; int5 -> int6: the fact that something does not cling hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the crutch does foal exenteration. ; $context$ = sent1: if the crutch is not legible then the fact that the wake is masochistic and it does foal exenteration is not correct. sent2: the crutch is not masochistic if it is not a kind of a cling or it is legible or both. sent3: the tepal is not crosswise and does not sterilize Service. sent4: if the crutch is not a cling it is not masochistic. sent5: the crutch is crosswise if the HAZMAT does not gossip but it is a subsumption. sent6: the freeze is not masochistic. sent7: if something that is not crosswise does not sterilize Service the HAZMAT does not cling. sent8: the crutch is a cling or not illegible or both. sent9: that the crutch does not cling or is legible or both is true. sent10: the crutch is masochistic if it does not foal exenteration. sent11: if something is not non-crosswise and it does sterilize Service then it is not legible. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crutch does not foal exenteration.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the crutch is masochistic.; sent2 & sent9 -> int2: the crutch is non-masochistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__