the accepting does not occur and the hold does not occur.
sent1: that the fact that the caliphate occurs but the contention does not occur is correct is not correct. sent2: that the caulescentness occurs and the scopalness does not occur triggers that the holding does not occur. sent3: the mediatoriness occurs. sent4: if the fact that the mediatoriness does not occur and the deviating cook does not occur is not correct the accepting does not occur. sent5: the Macedonian but not the scopalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mediatoriness does not occur and the deviating cook does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the mediatoriness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mediatoriness does not occur and the deviating cook does not occur is not true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the accepting does not occur.; sent5 -> int5: the scopalness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the accepting does not occur and the hold does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the caliphate occurs but the contention does not occur is correct is not correct. sent2: that the caulescentness occurs and the scopalness does not occur triggers that the holding does not occur. sent3: the mediatoriness occurs. sent4: if the fact that the mediatoriness does not occur and the deviating cook does not occur is not correct the accepting does not occur. sent5: the Macedonian but not the scopalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mediatoriness does not occur and the deviating cook does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the mediatoriness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mediatoriness does not occur and the deviating cook does not occur is not true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the accepting does not occur.; sent5 -> int5: the scopalness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__