the fact that that the anoxemicness happens prevents that the shortening occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the surmising thill occurs if the catapulticness happens. sent2: that the Bond does not occur and the surmising aerial does not occur is wrong. sent3: the fact that both the psychologicalness and the non-imperishableness happens is not correct. sent4: if that the laceration occurs is true then the lay-up does not occur and the trucking does not occur. sent5: that the foremanship happens and the retardation does not occur is incorrect if the shortening occurs. sent6: that the concert does not occur and the bidding does not occur is false. sent7: that the foremanship occurs but the retardation does not occur is not correct. sent8: the fact that the restraining documentation happens and the radiologicalness does not occur is wrong. sent9: the anoxemicness does not occur if the fact that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation does not occur does not hold. sent10: the stimulativeness does not occur. sent11: if that the outstaring Inchon occurs is true the accounting happens. sent12: if the shortening occurs then that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation does not occur does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation does not occur is not correct then the anoxemicness happens. sent14: that that not the foremanship but the retardation happens hold is not right if the shortening occurs. sent15: if the hexadecimalness happens then the socage does not occur. sent16: if the anoxemicness occurs the shortening happens. sent17: the fact that the atypicalness and the non-arundinaceousness happens is not true if the spectrographicness happens. sent18: that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation happens is not right. sent19: that the anoxemicness happens and/or the shortening happens is brought about by that the lay-up does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the anoxemicness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shortening occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation does not occur does not hold is not incorrect.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the anoxemicness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shortening does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the unrepeatableness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the anoxemicness happens prevents that the shortening occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the surmising thill occurs if the catapulticness happens. sent2: that the Bond does not occur and the surmising aerial does not occur is wrong. sent3: the fact that both the psychologicalness and the non-imperishableness happens is not correct. sent4: if that the laceration occurs is true then the lay-up does not occur and the trucking does not occur. sent5: that the foremanship happens and the retardation does not occur is incorrect if the shortening occurs. sent6: that the concert does not occur and the bidding does not occur is false. sent7: that the foremanship occurs but the retardation does not occur is not correct. sent8: the fact that the restraining documentation happens and the radiologicalness does not occur is wrong. sent9: the anoxemicness does not occur if the fact that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation does not occur does not hold. sent10: the stimulativeness does not occur. sent11: if that the outstaring Inchon occurs is true the accounting happens. sent12: if the shortening occurs then that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation does not occur does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation does not occur is not correct then the anoxemicness happens. sent14: that that not the foremanship but the retardation happens hold is not right if the shortening occurs. sent15: if the hexadecimalness happens then the socage does not occur. sent16: if the anoxemicness occurs the shortening happens. sent17: the fact that the atypicalness and the non-arundinaceousness happens is not true if the spectrographicness happens. sent18: that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation happens is not right. sent19: that the anoxemicness happens and/or the shortening happens is brought about by that the lay-up does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the anoxemicness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shortening occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the foremanship does not occur and the retardation does not occur does not hold is not incorrect.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the anoxemicness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shortening does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__