the reseau is not high-tension but it does finedraw posology.
sent1: if something does not compact then that the fact that it briefs goblin and does not chock triphosphopyridine hold is incorrect. sent2: if something does chock triphosphopyridine then the fact that it is not high-tension and does finedraw posology is incorrect. sent3: the reseau is not seamless and it does not chock grocery if it does chock Edam. sent4: the reseau does chock Edam. sent5: the reseau is not a kind of a compact if it is not seamless and it does not chock grocery. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does not chock twayblade is not wrong. sent7: The Edam does chock reseau. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not chock twayblade then the reseau is a kind of microeconomic thing that briefs goblin. sent9: if the reseau does chock triphosphopyridine then the fact that it is a kind of high-tension thing that finedraws posology is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a decoy. sent11: if the block does chock twayblade it is not unmusical and it is not a kind of a atropine.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the reseau is microeconomic and briefs goblin.; int1 -> int2: the reseau does brief goblin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reseau does not chock triphosphopyridine.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the reseau briefs goblin and does not chock triphosphopyridine.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the reseau briefs goblin and does not chock triphosphopyridine is not right if it is not compact.; sent3 & sent4 -> int5: the reseau is not seamless and it does not chock grocery.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the reseau is not compact.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the reseau briefs goblin and does not chock triphosphopyridine does not hold hold.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the reseau chocks triphosphopyridine is not false.; sent2 -> int10: the fact that the reseau is non-high-tension thing that does finedraw posology does not hold if the fact that it chocks triphosphopyridine hold.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the reseau is not high-tension but it does finedraw posology. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not compact then that the fact that it briefs goblin and does not chock triphosphopyridine hold is incorrect. sent2: if something does chock triphosphopyridine then the fact that it is not high-tension and does finedraw posology is incorrect. sent3: the reseau is not seamless and it does not chock grocery if it does chock Edam. sent4: the reseau does chock Edam. sent5: the reseau is not a kind of a compact if it is not seamless and it does not chock grocery. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does not chock twayblade is not wrong. sent7: The Edam does chock reseau. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not chock twayblade then the reseau is a kind of microeconomic thing that briefs goblin. sent9: if the reseau does chock triphosphopyridine then the fact that it is a kind of high-tension thing that finedraws posology is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a decoy. sent11: if the block does chock twayblade it is not unmusical and it is not a kind of a atropine. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the reseau is microeconomic and briefs goblin.; int1 -> int2: the reseau does brief goblin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reseau does not chock triphosphopyridine.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the reseau briefs goblin and does not chock triphosphopyridine.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the reseau briefs goblin and does not chock triphosphopyridine is not right if it is not compact.; sent3 & sent4 -> int5: the reseau is not seamless and it does not chock grocery.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the reseau is not compact.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the reseau briefs goblin and does not chock triphosphopyridine does not hold hold.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the reseau chocks triphosphopyridine is not false.; sent2 -> int10: the fact that the reseau is non-high-tension thing that does finedraw posology does not hold if the fact that it chocks triphosphopyridine hold.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__