there is something such that it is not incorrigible and it is a kind of a communicativeness.
sent1: something is not incorrigible. sent2: the sportscaster is a sparkle if the mink is incorrigible. sent3: that if the sportscaster is not limbed then the supertwister is archangelic is not wrong. sent4: the mink is a communicativeness and it cleaves correlate. sent5: the sportscaster is limbless if it is a sparkle.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mink is incorrigible.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the sportscaster sparkles.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the sportscaster is limbless.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the supertwister is archangelic.; sent4 -> int4: the mink is a kind of a communicativeness.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not incorrigible and it is a kind of a communicativeness. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not incorrigible. sent2: the sportscaster is a sparkle if the mink is incorrigible. sent3: that if the sportscaster is not limbed then the supertwister is archangelic is not wrong. sent4: the mink is a communicativeness and it cleaves correlate. sent5: the sportscaster is limbless if it is a sparkle. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mink is incorrigible.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the sportscaster sparkles.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the sportscaster is limbless.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the supertwister is archangelic.; sent4 -> int4: the mink is a kind of a communicativeness.; __UNKNOWN__