that the vermiculation is not a Athanasianism and/or it is a kind of a rockrose is false.
sent1: that the butty is not a deserts and it is not a sprawling is wrong if the extensor is not a kind of a lecture. sent2: the extensor is a impressiveness. sent3: the extensor is not a kind of a lecture if the passage is not a kind of a nanovolt and is not a smoothed. sent4: the extensor is not a deserts. sent5: if the vermiculation is a kind of a resinoid and it is urogenital then that it is not a sprawling is true. sent6: the butty is a kind of a nanovolt if it is not a deserts and is not a kind of a rockrose. sent7: the vermiculation is a kind of a smoothed and/or is a rockrose. sent8: the butty is a kind of a nanovolt and/or is a kind of a deserts if the extensor is not a lecture. sent9: the butty does lecture if it is not cloudy and it does not guarantee responsibility. sent10: if a lecture is a sprawling then it is not a deserts. sent11: the butty is not cloudy and does not guarantee responsibility. sent12: the butty is a rockrose. sent13: if the delicacy is not skinless then it is not a checkpoint. sent14: the vermiculation is not non-smoothed. sent15: if that the fact that the extensor is a smoothed and it is a nanovolt is not false is not correct it is not a impressiveness. sent16: that the vermiculation is glacial and it is a deserts hold. sent17: the fact that the extensor is a kind of smoothed a nanovolt is incorrect if the butty is not a deserts. sent18: if the butty is cloudy but it does not guarantee responsibility then it is a lecture. sent19: if the butty is not a kind of a sprawling the vermiculation is not a kind of a Athanasianism and/or it is a rockrose.
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the butty is a kind of a lecture.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the butty is a kind of a sprawling.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the butty is a lecture and does sprawl is not incorrect.; sent10 -> int3: if the butty is a lecture and it is a kind of a sprawling then it is not a kind of a deserts.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the butty does not desert.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the extensor is a kind of a smoothed and it is a kind of a nanovolt is not true.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the extensor is not a impressiveness.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the butty does not sprawl.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the vermiculation is not a Athanasianism and/or is a kind of a rockrose is false.
$hypothesis$ = that the vermiculation is not a Athanasianism and/or it is a kind of a rockrose is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the butty is not a deserts and it is not a sprawling is wrong if the extensor is not a kind of a lecture. sent2: the extensor is a impressiveness. sent3: the extensor is not a kind of a lecture if the passage is not a kind of a nanovolt and is not a smoothed. sent4: the extensor is not a deserts. sent5: if the vermiculation is a kind of a resinoid and it is urogenital then that it is not a sprawling is true. sent6: the butty is a kind of a nanovolt if it is not a deserts and is not a kind of a rockrose. sent7: the vermiculation is a kind of a smoothed and/or is a rockrose. sent8: the butty is a kind of a nanovolt and/or is a kind of a deserts if the extensor is not a lecture. sent9: the butty does lecture if it is not cloudy and it does not guarantee responsibility. sent10: if a lecture is a sprawling then it is not a deserts. sent11: the butty is not cloudy and does not guarantee responsibility. sent12: the butty is a rockrose. sent13: if the delicacy is not skinless then it is not a checkpoint. sent14: the vermiculation is not non-smoothed. sent15: if that the fact that the extensor is a smoothed and it is a nanovolt is not false is not correct it is not a impressiveness. sent16: that the vermiculation is glacial and it is a deserts hold. sent17: the fact that the extensor is a kind of smoothed a nanovolt is incorrect if the butty is not a deserts. sent18: if the butty is cloudy but it does not guarantee responsibility then it is a lecture. sent19: if the butty is not a kind of a sprawling the vermiculation is not a kind of a Athanasianism and/or it is a rockrose. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the butty is a kind of a lecture.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the butty is a kind of a sprawling.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the butty is a lecture and does sprawl is not incorrect.; sent10 -> int3: if the butty is a lecture and it is a kind of a sprawling then it is not a kind of a deserts.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the butty does not desert.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the extensor is a kind of a smoothed and it is a kind of a nanovolt is not true.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the extensor is not a impressiveness.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the butty does not sprawl.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__