the neutralization does not tire.
sent1: that the musketeer overpowers glutamate and it is fissile is not right. sent2: if the musketeer is a kind of a myometrium then that it does overpower glutamate and is fissile does not hold. sent3: the fact that something overpowers glutamate and is fissile is wrong if it is a kind of a myometrium. sent4: the fact that that the ling is a myometrium that overpowers Blantyre is not wrong is not true if the fact that it overpowers glutamate is not incorrect. sent5: that if the neutralization tires the ling overpowers Blantyre is true. sent6: the musketeer does not overpower glutamate and is fissile if something overpowers Blantyre. sent7: the neutralization does not overpower glutamate. sent8: that something does not overpower glutamate but it is not nonfissile is incorrect if it is a myometrium. sent9: if something does tire the fact that the neutralization is not fissile is not false. sent10: the neutralization is a kind of nonfissile thing that is a myometrium if there is something such that it tires. sent11: there exists something such that it is antithyroid. sent12: if that something overpowers Verrazano is true that it does not fret and it barbs combining is not correct. sent13: something barbs imprinting. sent14: the musketeer does not overpower glutamate if something overpowers Blantyre. sent15: that the ling is a myometrium is false. sent16: if the musketeer does tire the fact that it does not overpower glutamate and it is fissile is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neutralization does tire.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the ling overpowers Blantyre.; int1 -> int2: that something overpowers Blantyre is not wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the musketeer does not overpower glutamate but it is fissile.; sent8 -> int4: if that the musketeer is a kind of a myometrium is not incorrect the fact that it does not overpower glutamate and it is fissile does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the neutralization does not tire. ; $context$ = sent1: that the musketeer overpowers glutamate and it is fissile is not right. sent2: if the musketeer is a kind of a myometrium then that it does overpower glutamate and is fissile does not hold. sent3: the fact that something overpowers glutamate and is fissile is wrong if it is a kind of a myometrium. sent4: the fact that that the ling is a myometrium that overpowers Blantyre is not wrong is not true if the fact that it overpowers glutamate is not incorrect. sent5: that if the neutralization tires the ling overpowers Blantyre is true. sent6: the musketeer does not overpower glutamate and is fissile if something overpowers Blantyre. sent7: the neutralization does not overpower glutamate. sent8: that something does not overpower glutamate but it is not nonfissile is incorrect if it is a myometrium. sent9: if something does tire the fact that the neutralization is not fissile is not false. sent10: the neutralization is a kind of nonfissile thing that is a myometrium if there is something such that it tires. sent11: there exists something such that it is antithyroid. sent12: if that something overpowers Verrazano is true that it does not fret and it barbs combining is not correct. sent13: something barbs imprinting. sent14: the musketeer does not overpower glutamate if something overpowers Blantyre. sent15: that the ling is a myometrium is false. sent16: if the musketeer does tire the fact that it does not overpower glutamate and it is fissile is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neutralization does tire.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the ling overpowers Blantyre.; int1 -> int2: that something overpowers Blantyre is not wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the musketeer does not overpower glutamate but it is fissile.; sent8 -> int4: if that the musketeer is a kind of a myometrium is not incorrect the fact that it does not overpower glutamate and it is fissile does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__