the fact that there is something such that that it does redden craziness and is not a distillation does not hold is wrong.
sent1: that the circumference is a distillation and is not nontraditional does not hold. sent2: the baron is not nontraditional if there is something such that that it is classificatory and it is not a distillation is not correct. sent3: there is something such that that that it is both a distillation and classificatory is not false is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Lesbian and is nontraditional is not right. sent5: the Lesbian is not classificatory if there is something such that the fact that it is a Lesbian and it is not nontraditional is incorrect. sent6: that the tallow is a dainty but not classificatory is false. sent7: the fact that the baron is pro-choice and it reddens craziness is not true. sent8: there is something such that it is a Lesbian and it is not classificatory. sent9: there exists something such that it does coat luau and it is not an appendectomy. sent10: if the circumference is not a Lesbian that the baron reddens craziness and it is classificatory does not hold. sent11: the fact that that the baron is a Lesbian but it is not nontraditional is wrong is not false. sent12: that something is a kind of a heaviness but it does not redden craziness is not true if it is not classificatory. sent13: if the baron is not a Lesbian then that that the circumference is nontraditional but it does not redden craziness is not incorrect is not correct. sent14: that the circumference does redden craziness but it is not a distillation is not correct if the Lesbian is not classificatory. sent15: the fact that the circumference reddens craziness and it is classificatory is wrong. sent16: if there is something such that it is not a distillation then the hell-kite is not a kind of a croquette.
sent11 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a Lesbian and not nontraditional is false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the Lesbian is not classificatory.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: that the circumference does redden craziness but it is not a distillation is wrong.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fir is a kind of a heaviness but it does not redden craziness is not right.
sent12 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the fir is a heaviness but it does not redden craziness is incorrect hold if it is not classificatory.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that that it does redden craziness and is not a distillation does not hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the circumference is a distillation and is not nontraditional does not hold. sent2: the baron is not nontraditional if there is something such that that it is classificatory and it is not a distillation is not correct. sent3: there is something such that that that it is both a distillation and classificatory is not false is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Lesbian and is nontraditional is not right. sent5: the Lesbian is not classificatory if there is something such that the fact that it is a Lesbian and it is not nontraditional is incorrect. sent6: that the tallow is a dainty but not classificatory is false. sent7: the fact that the baron is pro-choice and it reddens craziness is not true. sent8: there is something such that it is a Lesbian and it is not classificatory. sent9: there exists something such that it does coat luau and it is not an appendectomy. sent10: if the circumference is not a Lesbian that the baron reddens craziness and it is classificatory does not hold. sent11: the fact that that the baron is a Lesbian but it is not nontraditional is wrong is not false. sent12: that something is a kind of a heaviness but it does not redden craziness is not true if it is not classificatory. sent13: if the baron is not a Lesbian then that that the circumference is nontraditional but it does not redden craziness is not incorrect is not correct. sent14: that the circumference does redden craziness but it is not a distillation is not correct if the Lesbian is not classificatory. sent15: the fact that the circumference reddens craziness and it is classificatory is wrong. sent16: if there is something such that it is not a distillation then the hell-kite is not a kind of a croquette. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a Lesbian and not nontraditional is false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the Lesbian is not classificatory.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: that the circumference does redden craziness but it is not a distillation is wrong.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__