that the epigenesis is not a dependant and is a kind of a resignation is false.
sent1: something that does not worsen is not a kind of a dependant and is a resignation. sent2: if the hemiplegic does not letter Pythonidae the fact that the escape does not letter Pythonidae and does not letter Shoshonean does not hold. sent3: the airframe does not letter Pythonidae. sent4: if the hemiplegic is not a dependant the fact that the epigenesis is not a kind of a dependant and does not letter Pythonidae is false. sent5: if the fact that the airframe worsens hold then that the escape is a kind of androgenic a dependant is not true. sent6: if the escape does worsen that the airframe is androgenic but it does not chirk is not right. sent7: if the epigenesis is not a dependant but it is a kind of a resignation the hemiplegic does not letter Pythonidae. sent8: the fact that the hitchhiker is not a Christ's-thorn and letters Shoshonean is false. sent9: the escape worsens if that it does not letter Pythonidae and does not letter Shoshonean is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epigenesis is not a dependant but it is a kind of a resignation.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the hemiplegic does not letter Pythonidae.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the escape does not letter Pythonidae and does not letter Shoshonean is false.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the escape does worsen is not false.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the airframe is androgenic but it does not chirk is wrong.;
the epigenesis is not a dependant and is a kind of a resignation.
sent1 -> int5: the epigenesis is both not a dependant and a resignation if it does not worsen.;
$hypothesis$ = that the epigenesis is not a dependant and is a kind of a resignation is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not worsen is not a kind of a dependant and is a resignation. sent2: if the hemiplegic does not letter Pythonidae the fact that the escape does not letter Pythonidae and does not letter Shoshonean does not hold. sent3: the airframe does not letter Pythonidae. sent4: if the hemiplegic is not a dependant the fact that the epigenesis is not a kind of a dependant and does not letter Pythonidae is false. sent5: if the fact that the airframe worsens hold then that the escape is a kind of androgenic a dependant is not true. sent6: if the escape does worsen that the airframe is androgenic but it does not chirk is not right. sent7: if the epigenesis is not a dependant but it is a kind of a resignation the hemiplegic does not letter Pythonidae. sent8: the fact that the hitchhiker is not a Christ's-thorn and letters Shoshonean is false. sent9: the escape worsens if that it does not letter Pythonidae and does not letter Shoshonean is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epigenesis is not a dependant but it is a kind of a resignation.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the hemiplegic does not letter Pythonidae.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the escape does not letter Pythonidae and does not letter Shoshonean is false.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the escape does worsen is not false.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the airframe is androgenic but it does not chirk is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__