that the cataphract does not swelter and is not a dragoon is incorrect.
sent1: the fink is a lowness if there is something such that the fact that it is unseasonable and it is a kind of a unsanitariness is not correct. sent2: the parapet is a kind of a minimization. sent3: the cataphract does not glom insurability if the backlog is a tenorist but it is not a kind of a lowness. sent4: that the cataphract does subtilize Suharto and is a minimization is not correct if it does not glom insurability. sent5: the cataphract is not a dragoon. sent6: if the backlog is a tenorist and it is a lowness then the cataphract does not glom insurability. sent7: the fact that the parapet is unseasonable and a unsanitariness is not right. sent8: if the fact that the cataphract subtilizes Suharto and is a minimization does not hold it does not swelter. sent9: the fact that the backlog is not a kind of a lowness hold. sent10: if the fink is a lowness then the backlog is a kind of a tenorist but it is not a kind of a lowness.
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is unseasonable and it is a unsanitariness is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fink is a lowness.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the backlog is a tenorist and is not a lowness.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the cataphract does not glom insurability.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the cataphract does subtilize Suharto and is a minimization is not true.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that the cataphract does not swelter is not false.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the cataphract does not swelter and is not a dragoon is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fink is a lowness if there is something such that the fact that it is unseasonable and it is a kind of a unsanitariness is not correct. sent2: the parapet is a kind of a minimization. sent3: the cataphract does not glom insurability if the backlog is a tenorist but it is not a kind of a lowness. sent4: that the cataphract does subtilize Suharto and is a minimization is not correct if it does not glom insurability. sent5: the cataphract is not a dragoon. sent6: if the backlog is a tenorist and it is a lowness then the cataphract does not glom insurability. sent7: the fact that the parapet is unseasonable and a unsanitariness is not right. sent8: if the fact that the cataphract subtilizes Suharto and is a minimization does not hold it does not swelter. sent9: the fact that the backlog is not a kind of a lowness hold. sent10: if the fink is a lowness then the backlog is a kind of a tenorist but it is not a kind of a lowness. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is unseasonable and it is a unsanitariness is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fink is a lowness.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the backlog is a tenorist and is not a lowness.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the cataphract does not glom insurability.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the cataphract does subtilize Suharto and is a minimization is not true.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that the cataphract does not swelter is not false.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__