the iconography does not act oath.
sent1: that the waltzer condoles redetermination and it acts oath is right. sent2: that the Westernization does not condole redetermination if that that the waltzer is intercontinental but not a claymore is correct does not hold is correct. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a Waterloo but it does condole tastefulness is incorrect the fact that it is not a Normandie is not wrong. sent4: that the iconography does not act oath is right if the Westernization does not condole redetermination. sent5: the bottle-grass is not intercontinental if it is not a Waterloo and does condole tastefulness. sent6: the fact that the waltzer is intercontinental and not a claymore is not correct if the bottle-grass is not intercontinental. sent7: the bottle-grass is a Normandie.
sent3 -> int1: if that the bottle-grass is not a Waterloo and condoles tastefulness is not correct it is not a kind of a Normandie.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bottle-grass is not a kind of a Waterloo and does condole tastefulness is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bottle-grass is not a Normandie.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bottle-grass is not a Waterloo and condoles tastefulness.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the bottle-grass is not intercontinental.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the waltzer is intercontinental but it is not a claymore is not right.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the Westernization does not condole redetermination.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the oxygen is not a Normandie.
sent1 -> int8: the waltzer condoles redetermination.;
$hypothesis$ = the iconography does not act oath. ; $context$ = sent1: that the waltzer condoles redetermination and it acts oath is right. sent2: that the Westernization does not condole redetermination if that that the waltzer is intercontinental but not a claymore is correct does not hold is correct. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a Waterloo but it does condole tastefulness is incorrect the fact that it is not a Normandie is not wrong. sent4: that the iconography does not act oath is right if the Westernization does not condole redetermination. sent5: the bottle-grass is not intercontinental if it is not a Waterloo and does condole tastefulness. sent6: the fact that the waltzer is intercontinental and not a claymore is not correct if the bottle-grass is not intercontinental. sent7: the bottle-grass is a Normandie. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if that the bottle-grass is not a Waterloo and condoles tastefulness is not correct it is not a kind of a Normandie.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bottle-grass is not a kind of a Waterloo and does condole tastefulness is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bottle-grass is not a Normandie.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bottle-grass is not a Waterloo and condoles tastefulness.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the bottle-grass is not intercontinental.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the waltzer is intercontinental but it is not a claymore is not right.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the Westernization does not condole redetermination.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__