the indentation does not occur.
sent1: that the revue happens hold. sent2: the non-changelessness prevents that the Bermudanness occurs. sent3: if that the small-capitalizationness does not occur but the changelessness happens is not correct the Bermudan does not occur. sent4: the paperiness and/or the nectar-richness is caused by that the chemotherapeuticness happens. sent5: that the dropkicking happens results in that the miniaturization does not occur and the counterbombardment does not occur. sent6: the paperiness does not occur or the nectar-richness happens or both if the chemotherapeuticness occurs. sent7: if both the bluster and the non-chemotherapeuticness occurs the indentation occurs. sent8: if the chemotherapeuticness does not occur the fact that not the bluster but the ticktock occurs is incorrect. sent9: that the non-paperiness or the nectar-richness or both happens is not right if the revue occurs. sent10: that the indentation does not occur is caused by that the counterbombardment does not occur and the Bermudan does not occur. sent11: that the RF does not occur or the surmising Nehemiah occurs or both is false. sent12: if the teasing psylla does not occur that not the small-capitalizationness but the changelessness occurs does not hold. sent13: the teasing psylla does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chemotherapeuticness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the paperiness does not occur or the nectar-richness occurs or both.; sent9 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the paperiness does not occur and/or the nectar-richness happens is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the chemotherapeuticness does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the bluster does not occur but the ticktock happens is false.; sent12 & sent13 -> int6: that the small-capitalizationness does not occur but the changelessness occurs is false.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the Bermudan does not occur.;
the indentation happens.
$hypothesis$ = the indentation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the revue happens hold. sent2: the non-changelessness prevents that the Bermudanness occurs. sent3: if that the small-capitalizationness does not occur but the changelessness happens is not correct the Bermudan does not occur. sent4: the paperiness and/or the nectar-richness is caused by that the chemotherapeuticness happens. sent5: that the dropkicking happens results in that the miniaturization does not occur and the counterbombardment does not occur. sent6: the paperiness does not occur or the nectar-richness happens or both if the chemotherapeuticness occurs. sent7: if both the bluster and the non-chemotherapeuticness occurs the indentation occurs. sent8: if the chemotherapeuticness does not occur the fact that not the bluster but the ticktock occurs is incorrect. sent9: that the non-paperiness or the nectar-richness or both happens is not right if the revue occurs. sent10: that the indentation does not occur is caused by that the counterbombardment does not occur and the Bermudan does not occur. sent11: that the RF does not occur or the surmising Nehemiah occurs or both is false. sent12: if the teasing psylla does not occur that not the small-capitalizationness but the changelessness occurs does not hold. sent13: the teasing psylla does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chemotherapeuticness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the paperiness does not occur or the nectar-richness occurs or both.; sent9 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the paperiness does not occur and/or the nectar-richness happens is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the chemotherapeuticness does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the bluster does not occur but the ticktock happens is false.; sent12 & sent13 -> int6: that the small-capitalizationness does not occur but the changelessness occurs is false.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the Bermudan does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__