the briefcase is non-feline.
sent1: if the evacuation is not voyeuristic but it does carjack banned the briefcase is not voyeuristic. sent2: the briefcase is not a kind of a feline if it does not chirr and it is distal. sent3: the carbineer does not segregate recitalist but it is a drift. sent4: if something that is a digestion is not trustworthy it is feline. sent5: the briefcase does not chirr but it redeposits. sent6: a non-trustworthy thing carjacks banned and is a kind of a digestion. sent7: the evacuation is a kind of a digestion that is not trustworthy. sent8: the briefcase is distal if the lambrequin does segregate out-basket. sent9: if the lancetfish is a minesweeper then the lambrequin does segregate out-basket. sent10: if the evacuation is a kind of a digestion then the carbineer is not voyeuristic and does not carjack banned. sent11: the lancetfish is a minesweeper if the carbineer does not carjack banned.
sent7 -> int1: that the evacuation is a digestion is not wrong.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the carbineer is not voyeuristic and it does not carjack banned.; int2 -> int3: the carbineer does not carjack banned.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the lancetfish is a minesweeper.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the lambrequin segregates out-basket is true.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the briefcase is distal.; sent5 -> int7: the briefcase does not chirr.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the briefcase does not chirr but it is distal.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the briefcase carjacks banned.
sent6 -> int9: if the fact that the briefcase is not trustworthy is not wrong it does carjack banned and it is a digestion.;
$hypothesis$ = the briefcase is non-feline. ; $context$ = sent1: if the evacuation is not voyeuristic but it does carjack banned the briefcase is not voyeuristic. sent2: the briefcase is not a kind of a feline if it does not chirr and it is distal. sent3: the carbineer does not segregate recitalist but it is a drift. sent4: if something that is a digestion is not trustworthy it is feline. sent5: the briefcase does not chirr but it redeposits. sent6: a non-trustworthy thing carjacks banned and is a kind of a digestion. sent7: the evacuation is a kind of a digestion that is not trustworthy. sent8: the briefcase is distal if the lambrequin does segregate out-basket. sent9: if the lancetfish is a minesweeper then the lambrequin does segregate out-basket. sent10: if the evacuation is a kind of a digestion then the carbineer is not voyeuristic and does not carjack banned. sent11: the lancetfish is a minesweeper if the carbineer does not carjack banned. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the evacuation is a digestion is not wrong.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the carbineer is not voyeuristic and it does not carjack banned.; int2 -> int3: the carbineer does not carjack banned.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the lancetfish is a minesweeper.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that the lambrequin segregates out-basket is true.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the briefcase is distal.; sent5 -> int7: the briefcase does not chirr.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the briefcase does not chirr but it is distal.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__