that the stob does not hype syllabled and is a dissociation is wrong.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not insert prattler that the arum is a kind of non-periodic thing that is a revisionism does not hold. sent2: if the Tyke inserts moderationism the spicemill is a transponder. sent3: if that the fact that the pallasite does not insert sinning and it is not low-tension does not hold is not wrong then the Tyke does hype disproof. sent4: the spicemill is not a revisionism if that the arum is non-periodic thing that is a kind of a revisionism is not correct. sent5: if something does hype overture it stratifies mummery. sent6: the washboard is a shagbark and is not catapultic if the Bengali is not a kind of an astronomy. sent7: the fact that the pallasite does not insert sinning and does not hype disproof is incorrect. sent8: the stob is a dissociation. sent9: the Tyke does hype disproof if the pallasite is low-tension. sent10: the fact that something does not last cravat and it is not a kind of an aphasia is wrong if the fact that it is not a revisionism hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an astronomy that does not row is false. sent12: if there is something such that that it is a transponder is not wrong the stob does not hype syllabled but it is a dissociation. sent13: if the fact that something does not last cravat and is not an aphasia is not correct then the fact that it is not spermicidal hold. sent14: the stob does insert moderationism if the fact that the pallasite is a transponder but it does not insert moderationism is not true. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not spermicidal the fact that the Tyke is a kind of a reverse and it is a kind of an impersonation is not true. sent16: that the pallasite does not insert sinning and it is not low-tension is incorrect. sent17: if that something inserts prattler and it is a kind of a god is not true then it does not inserts prattler. sent18: the stob is a kind of a dissociation if there is something such that it is a kind of a transponder. sent19: if something is not identifiable then that the fact that the suppository does insert prattler and it is a kind of a god is wrong is right. sent20: that the Bengali is not an astronomy is correct if there is something such that that it is an astronomy but not a row is false. sent21: that that something does not hype syllabled and is a dissociation is false if it does insert moderationism is not wrong. sent22: the fact that the pallasite does not insert sinning and is low-tension is false. sent23: if the stob does insert sinning then the fact that the pallasite is a dissociation is not wrong. sent24: if something hypes disproof then it does insert moderationism. sent25: if the washboard is a shagbark but not catapultic it is not identifiable.
sent3 & sent16 -> int1: the Tyke does hype disproof.; sent24 -> int2: if the Tyke hypes disproof it does insert moderationism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Tyke does insert moderationism.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the spicemill is a transponder.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is a transponder.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the stob does not hype syllabled but it is a dissociation is not true.
sent21 -> int6: if the stob inserts moderationism then the fact that it does not hype syllabled and it is a dissociation is not right.; sent13 -> int7: the spicemill is not spermicidal if that it does not last cravat and is not an aphasia is incorrect.; sent10 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the spicemill does not last cravat and it is not the aphasia is wrong if the spicemill is not a revisionism hold.; sent17 -> int9: if the fact that the suppository does insert prattler and is a god does not hold it does not insert prattler.; sent11 & sent20 -> int10: the Bengali is not an astronomy.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the washboard is a kind of a shagbark and is not catapultic.; sent25 & int11 -> int12: the washboard is not identifiable.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is not identifiable is correct.; int13 & sent19 -> int14: that the suppository does insert prattler and it is a god is not true.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the suppository does not insert prattler.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it does not insert prattler.; int16 & sent1 -> int17: the fact that the arum is not periodic but it is a revisionism is not true.; sent4 & int17 -> int18: the spicemill is not a revisionism.; int8 & int18 -> int19: that the spicemill does not last cravat and is not an aphasia is incorrect.; int7 & int19 -> int20: the spicemill is not spermicidal.; int20 -> int21: something is not spermicidal.; int21 & sent15 -> int22: that the Tyke is a kind of a reverse and it is an impersonation is incorrect.; int22 -> int23: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of reverse an impersonation does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the stob does not hype syllabled and is a dissociation is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not insert prattler that the arum is a kind of non-periodic thing that is a revisionism does not hold. sent2: if the Tyke inserts moderationism the spicemill is a transponder. sent3: if that the fact that the pallasite does not insert sinning and it is not low-tension does not hold is not wrong then the Tyke does hype disproof. sent4: the spicemill is not a revisionism if that the arum is non-periodic thing that is a kind of a revisionism is not correct. sent5: if something does hype overture it stratifies mummery. sent6: the washboard is a shagbark and is not catapultic if the Bengali is not a kind of an astronomy. sent7: the fact that the pallasite does not insert sinning and does not hype disproof is incorrect. sent8: the stob is a dissociation. sent9: the Tyke does hype disproof if the pallasite is low-tension. sent10: the fact that something does not last cravat and it is not a kind of an aphasia is wrong if the fact that it is not a revisionism hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an astronomy that does not row is false. sent12: if there is something such that that it is a transponder is not wrong the stob does not hype syllabled but it is a dissociation. sent13: if the fact that something does not last cravat and is not an aphasia is not correct then the fact that it is not spermicidal hold. sent14: the stob does insert moderationism if the fact that the pallasite is a transponder but it does not insert moderationism is not true. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not spermicidal the fact that the Tyke is a kind of a reverse and it is a kind of an impersonation is not true. sent16: that the pallasite does not insert sinning and it is not low-tension is incorrect. sent17: if that something inserts prattler and it is a kind of a god is not true then it does not inserts prattler. sent18: the stob is a kind of a dissociation if there is something such that it is a kind of a transponder. sent19: if something is not identifiable then that the fact that the suppository does insert prattler and it is a kind of a god is wrong is right. sent20: that the Bengali is not an astronomy is correct if there is something such that that it is an astronomy but not a row is false. sent21: that that something does not hype syllabled and is a dissociation is false if it does insert moderationism is not wrong. sent22: the fact that the pallasite does not insert sinning and is low-tension is false. sent23: if the stob does insert sinning then the fact that the pallasite is a dissociation is not wrong. sent24: if something hypes disproof then it does insert moderationism. sent25: if the washboard is a shagbark but not catapultic it is not identifiable. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent16 -> int1: the Tyke does hype disproof.; sent24 -> int2: if the Tyke hypes disproof it does insert moderationism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Tyke does insert moderationism.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the spicemill is a transponder.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is a transponder.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__