there is something such that if it is not postictal and it does not perfume Sternotherus then the fact that it demotes asset is not wrong.
sent1: the Shah is unresentful if it does not demote riverbank and it is not postictal. sent2: the fact that the lota perfumes Sternotherus if the lota is not lethargic and it is not a kind of a superstructure is right. sent3: the Shah does demote asset if it is non-postictal thing that does not perfume Sternotherus. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a Greece and is not a viscose then it does elope. sent5: if the riverbank does not demote asset and it is not antimagnetic then it does demote carful. sent6: if the fact that the Shah is a kind of non-postictal thing that perfumes Sternotherus is not false then the fact that it demotes asset hold. sent7: the airstream does demote asset if it does not wench and it does not demote Castro. sent8: the fact that the Shah is a kind of the DMZ if the Shah is not a kind of a tatou and it does not demote asset is not false. sent9: if the Shah is not crinoid and not a vaulting then it is a kind of a poilu. sent10: there is something such that if it does not demote airstream and does not adolesce it brads ESR. sent11: if a non-hospitable thing is not an appetite then it demotes Meir. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is unchangeable and it does not brad Huston is true it is a buttercrunch. sent13: the Shah does demote asset if it is postictal and it does not perfume Sternotherus. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not postictal and it perfumes Sternotherus then it demotes asset. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of postictal thing that does not perfume Sternotherus it demotes asset. sent16: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a driving and it is not a syllable hold then it is undemonstrative. sent17: the Shah is not non-thermionic if it is not a madness and does not demote caimito. sent18: there is something such that if it is both not monotypic and not fancy then the fact that it does neglect is right. sent19: if the Shah does not perfume Sternotherus and it is non-Lithuanian the fact that it is a brevity is right. sent20: there exists something such that if that it does not master Bhaga and it does not demote journey is not wrong that it demotes self-criticism is correct.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is non-hospitable thing that is not a kind of an appetite then it demotes Meir.
sent11 -> int1: the finnan does demote Meir if it is not hospitable and it is not an appetite.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not postictal and it does not perfume Sternotherus then the fact that it demotes asset is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Shah is unresentful if it does not demote riverbank and it is not postictal. sent2: the fact that the lota perfumes Sternotherus if the lota is not lethargic and it is not a kind of a superstructure is right. sent3: the Shah does demote asset if it is non-postictal thing that does not perfume Sternotherus. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a Greece and is not a viscose then it does elope. sent5: if the riverbank does not demote asset and it is not antimagnetic then it does demote carful. sent6: if the fact that the Shah is a kind of non-postictal thing that perfumes Sternotherus is not false then the fact that it demotes asset hold. sent7: the airstream does demote asset if it does not wench and it does not demote Castro. sent8: the fact that the Shah is a kind of the DMZ if the Shah is not a kind of a tatou and it does not demote asset is not false. sent9: if the Shah is not crinoid and not a vaulting then it is a kind of a poilu. sent10: there is something such that if it does not demote airstream and does not adolesce it brads ESR. sent11: if a non-hospitable thing is not an appetite then it demotes Meir. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is unchangeable and it does not brad Huston is true it is a buttercrunch. sent13: the Shah does demote asset if it is postictal and it does not perfume Sternotherus. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not postictal and it perfumes Sternotherus then it demotes asset. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of postictal thing that does not perfume Sternotherus it demotes asset. sent16: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a driving and it is not a syllable hold then it is undemonstrative. sent17: the Shah is not non-thermionic if it is not a madness and does not demote caimito. sent18: there is something such that if it is both not monotypic and not fancy then the fact that it does neglect is right. sent19: if the Shah does not perfume Sternotherus and it is non-Lithuanian the fact that it is a brevity is right. sent20: there exists something such that if that it does not master Bhaga and it does not demote journey is not wrong that it demotes self-criticism is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__