the selsyn is not a cymule.
sent1: that the selsyn is a cymule hold if the macaroni does reline cross-examination. sent2: if the fact that the Utopian is audiovisual is not wrong the Farmer does impinge. sent3: if the macaroni is not a slasher and it is not rabbinical the ligament is a slasher. sent4: the selsyn does not reline cross-examination if something is a cymule and/or a tabun. sent5: the macaroni is a slasher if there is something such that that it is not rabbinical and it is a kind of an audiovisual is not false. sent6: the tiger is not magnetic. sent7: if something is a slasher then it does reline cross-examination. sent8: the ligament is not rabbinical if that the Utopian is not an audiovisual is true. sent9: if that the Farmer does not substantiate but it does impinge is not correct then it does not impinge. sent10: the Farmer is a slasher if the ligament is a slasher. sent11: the ligament is non-rabbinical but it is audiovisual if the Utopian is not an audiovisual. sent12: the fact that the Utopian does not impinge but it is audiovisual is not right if the Farmer is a kind of a slasher. sent13: the fact that the adobo is an audiovisual is not wrong. sent14: if there exists something such that that it does not impinge and is an audiovisual is not correct then the fact that the turtledove does substantiate is not incorrect. sent15: the fact that the Farmer does not substantiate and does impinge is false. sent16: the tiger is a tabun and is kind if it is not magnetic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Utopian is audiovisual.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Farmer does impinge.; sent9 & sent15 -> int2: the Farmer does not impinge.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Utopian is not an audiovisual.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the ligament is not rabbinical but it is a kind of an audiovisual.; int5 -> int6: something is not rabbinical and is not non-audiovisual.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the macaroni is a slasher.; sent7 -> int8: the macaroni does reline cross-examination if it is a kind of a slasher.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the macaroni does reline cross-examination.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the turtledove does substantiate.
sent16 & sent6 -> int10: the tiger is a tabun and is kind.; int10 -> int11: the tiger is a tabun.; int11 -> int12: the tiger is a cymule and/or is a tabun.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is a kind of a cymule and/or it is a kind of a tabun.; int13 & sent4 -> int14: the selsyn does not reline cross-examination.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that that it relines cross-examination is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the selsyn is not a cymule. ; $context$ = sent1: that the selsyn is a cymule hold if the macaroni does reline cross-examination. sent2: if the fact that the Utopian is audiovisual is not wrong the Farmer does impinge. sent3: if the macaroni is not a slasher and it is not rabbinical the ligament is a slasher. sent4: the selsyn does not reline cross-examination if something is a cymule and/or a tabun. sent5: the macaroni is a slasher if there is something such that that it is not rabbinical and it is a kind of an audiovisual is not false. sent6: the tiger is not magnetic. sent7: if something is a slasher then it does reline cross-examination. sent8: the ligament is not rabbinical if that the Utopian is not an audiovisual is true. sent9: if that the Farmer does not substantiate but it does impinge is not correct then it does not impinge. sent10: the Farmer is a slasher if the ligament is a slasher. sent11: the ligament is non-rabbinical but it is audiovisual if the Utopian is not an audiovisual. sent12: the fact that the Utopian does not impinge but it is audiovisual is not right if the Farmer is a kind of a slasher. sent13: the fact that the adobo is an audiovisual is not wrong. sent14: if there exists something such that that it does not impinge and is an audiovisual is not correct then the fact that the turtledove does substantiate is not incorrect. sent15: the fact that the Farmer does not substantiate and does impinge is false. sent16: the tiger is a tabun and is kind if it is not magnetic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Utopian is audiovisual.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Farmer does impinge.; sent9 & sent15 -> int2: the Farmer does not impinge.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Utopian is not an audiovisual.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the ligament is not rabbinical but it is a kind of an audiovisual.; int5 -> int6: something is not rabbinical and is not non-audiovisual.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the macaroni is a slasher.; sent7 -> int8: the macaroni does reline cross-examination if it is a kind of a slasher.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the macaroni does reline cross-examination.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__