that the fact that the pleaser is not a AMD and it is not a patented is not right is correct.
sent1: if that the puff sequences conversationalist hold then it is a AMD. sent2: the puff does not sequence conversationalist. sent3: the puff is not a magnetometer. sent4: the puff is neutral. sent5: the fact that the fact that the phenazopyridine is not a Argyrol but it is a kind of a kale is true is incorrect. sent6: that the nekton sequences conversationalist and is not a magnetometer is not correct if it is not a kind of a AMD. sent7: the nekton does sequence conversationalist and is not playful. sent8: if the pleaser is a neutral then the puff is a kind of a Bangor. sent9: the pleaser is not a kind of a AMD if the puff is a AMD and it is a kind of a neutral. sent10: the fact that the pleaser is not a AMD and does not patent is wrong if that it is not a kind of a neutral hold. sent11: the nekton is a AMD. sent12: the puff does reunify Photius but it is not a magnetometer. sent13: something is not a patented if it is a kind of a Bangor and it does not reunify Photius. sent14: the nekton is unplayful. sent15: if the pleaser is not a magnetometer it is a Bangor and does not reunify Photius.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pleaser is a neutral.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the puff is a Bangor.; sent12 -> int2: the puff does reunify Photius.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the puff is a Bangor that does reunify Photius.; sent7 -> int4: the nekton does sequence conversationalist.;
the pleaser is not a AMD and it is not a patented.
sent13 -> int5: the pleaser is not a patented if it is a kind of a Bangor and does not reunify Photius.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the pleaser is not a AMD and it is not a patented is not right is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the puff sequences conversationalist hold then it is a AMD. sent2: the puff does not sequence conversationalist. sent3: the puff is not a magnetometer. sent4: the puff is neutral. sent5: the fact that the fact that the phenazopyridine is not a Argyrol but it is a kind of a kale is true is incorrect. sent6: that the nekton sequences conversationalist and is not a magnetometer is not correct if it is not a kind of a AMD. sent7: the nekton does sequence conversationalist and is not playful. sent8: if the pleaser is a neutral then the puff is a kind of a Bangor. sent9: the pleaser is not a kind of a AMD if the puff is a AMD and it is a kind of a neutral. sent10: the fact that the pleaser is not a AMD and does not patent is wrong if that it is not a kind of a neutral hold. sent11: the nekton is a AMD. sent12: the puff does reunify Photius but it is not a magnetometer. sent13: something is not a patented if it is a kind of a Bangor and it does not reunify Photius. sent14: the nekton is unplayful. sent15: if the pleaser is not a magnetometer it is a Bangor and does not reunify Photius. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pleaser is a neutral.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the puff is a Bangor.; sent12 -> int2: the puff does reunify Photius.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the puff is a Bangor that does reunify Photius.; sent7 -> int4: the nekton does sequence conversationalist.; __UNKNOWN__