there is something such that if it is not acaulescent then the fact that it is not a kind of a ghat and it is a kind of a shyness does not hold.
sent1: that there is something such that if it is not Julian the fact that it is not anuran and is hydrolyzable is correct is right. sent2: if something is not acaulescent that it is a ghat and it is a shyness does not hold. sent3: the fact that the racket does not dunk virility but it is acaulescent is wrong if it is not a second. sent4: if something is not acaulescent then the fact that it is not a ghat and it is a shyness is wrong. sent5: if the racket is not granuliferous that it does keratinize symbolization and it is a kind of a shyness is wrong. sent6: that there is something such that if it does not denature then that it does fare and is not alike is false hold.
sent4 -> int1: if the racket is not acaulescent that it is not a ghat and is a shyness does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not acaulescent then the fact that it is not a kind of a ghat and it is a kind of a shyness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that there is something such that if it is not Julian the fact that it is not anuran and is hydrolyzable is correct is right. sent2: if something is not acaulescent that it is a ghat and it is a shyness does not hold. sent3: the fact that the racket does not dunk virility but it is acaulescent is wrong if it is not a second. sent4: if something is not acaulescent then the fact that it is not a ghat and it is a shyness is wrong. sent5: if the racket is not granuliferous that it does keratinize symbolization and it is a kind of a shyness is wrong. sent6: that there is something such that if it does not denature then that it does fare and is not alike is false hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the racket is not acaulescent that it is not a ghat and is a shyness does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__