the burglarizing etanercept does not occur.
sent1: that the appealableness occurs is prevented by that the glialness and the self-renewal happens. sent2: the forehandedness occurs. sent3: the pecticness happens. sent4: the orchestrating MAOI does not occur. sent5: if the electrosurgery does not occur then the hungering Hipsurus occurs. sent6: the incomprehensibleness does not occur and/or the electrosurgery does not occur if the fact that the orchestrating MAOI does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the burglarizing etanercept does not occur if both the forehandedness and the pecticness happens. sent8: the non-pecticness triggers that the burglarizing etanercept and the forehanded happens. sent9: the non-incomprehensibleness and/or that the electrosurgery does not occur causes that the electrosurgery does not occur. sent10: the advancement occurs. sent11: that the hungering Hipsurus happens and the inertialness occurs prevents the pecticness. sent12: the thermotherapy occurs. sent13: that the forehanded and the entr'acte happens is caused by the non-pecticness. sent14: if the operations and the avoiding happens then the incomprehensibleness does not occur. sent15: that the orchestrating balk does not occur and the burglarizing lavaliere does not occur prevents that the inertialness does not occur.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the forehanded happens and the pecticness happens.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the entr'acte occurs and the tolerance occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the burglarizing etanercept does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the appealableness occurs is prevented by that the glialness and the self-renewal happens. sent2: the forehandedness occurs. sent3: the pecticness happens. sent4: the orchestrating MAOI does not occur. sent5: if the electrosurgery does not occur then the hungering Hipsurus occurs. sent6: the incomprehensibleness does not occur and/or the electrosurgery does not occur if the fact that the orchestrating MAOI does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the burglarizing etanercept does not occur if both the forehandedness and the pecticness happens. sent8: the non-pecticness triggers that the burglarizing etanercept and the forehanded happens. sent9: the non-incomprehensibleness and/or that the electrosurgery does not occur causes that the electrosurgery does not occur. sent10: the advancement occurs. sent11: that the hungering Hipsurus happens and the inertialness occurs prevents the pecticness. sent12: the thermotherapy occurs. sent13: that the forehanded and the entr'acte happens is caused by the non-pecticness. sent14: if the operations and the avoiding happens then the incomprehensibleness does not occur. sent15: that the orchestrating balk does not occur and the burglarizing lavaliere does not occur prevents that the inertialness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the forehanded happens and the pecticness happens.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__