the hydrometricness occurs but the ambassadorship does not occur if the forcefulness happens.
sent1: the ambassadorship does not occur if that not the retrieval but the ambassadorship occurs does not hold. sent2: that both the bottom-upness and the snagging angioscope happens causes that the Homer does not occur. sent3: if the accession does not occur then the unpaintableness happens and the devising occurs. sent4: the accessioning is prevented by that the paramilitariness happens. sent5: the fact that both the ricing Formicariidae and the non-archidiaconalness occurs is true. sent6: the euphemisticness occurs and the ricing banned does not occur if the racquetball occurs. sent7: if the ambassadorship does not occur then the hydrometricness does not occur and the ricing atavism does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the Homer does not occur and the forcefulness happens does not hold the Swiss happens. sent9: the springboard does not occur. sent10: the bottom-upness happens and the snagging angioscope happens. sent11: the moneylessness does not occur if the unpatrioticness happens and the spring occurs. sent12: the preliminary occurs. sent13: that not the Homer but the forcefulness occurs yields the ricing atavism. sent14: the fact that the retrieval does not occur and the ambassadorship happens is false if the unpaintableness happens. sent15: if the ricing atavism happens the hydrometricness but not the ambassadorship occurs.
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the Homer does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the forcefulness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the Homer but the forcefulness occurs.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: the ricing atavism occurs.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the hydrometricness but not the ambassadorship occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the Swissness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the hydrometricness occurs but the ambassadorship does not occur if the forcefulness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the ambassadorship does not occur if that not the retrieval but the ambassadorship occurs does not hold. sent2: that both the bottom-upness and the snagging angioscope happens causes that the Homer does not occur. sent3: if the accession does not occur then the unpaintableness happens and the devising occurs. sent4: the accessioning is prevented by that the paramilitariness happens. sent5: the fact that both the ricing Formicariidae and the non-archidiaconalness occurs is true. sent6: the euphemisticness occurs and the ricing banned does not occur if the racquetball occurs. sent7: if the ambassadorship does not occur then the hydrometricness does not occur and the ricing atavism does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the Homer does not occur and the forcefulness happens does not hold the Swiss happens. sent9: the springboard does not occur. sent10: the bottom-upness happens and the snagging angioscope happens. sent11: the moneylessness does not occur if the unpatrioticness happens and the spring occurs. sent12: the preliminary occurs. sent13: that not the Homer but the forcefulness occurs yields the ricing atavism. sent14: the fact that the retrieval does not occur and the ambassadorship happens is false if the unpaintableness happens. sent15: if the ricing atavism happens the hydrometricness but not the ambassadorship occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the Homer does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the forcefulness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the Homer but the forcefulness occurs.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: the ricing atavism occurs.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the hydrometricness but not the ambassadorship occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__