the Alpineness happens.
sent1: the misfiring occurs and the fudging tinderbox occurs if the maxillofacialness does not occur. sent2: if that the concurrence does not occur is not incorrect then the fudging thane occurs and the nodularness occurs. sent3: the fudging tinderbox occurs. sent4: the fact that the headquartering barratry does not occur or the instrumentalness happens or both does not hold. sent5: the isometric does not occur. sent6: if the headquartering barratry happens the exchanging happens. sent7: the bonelessness occurs. sent8: that the roentgenographicness occurs and the misfire happens triggers that the Alpineness does not occur. sent9: the instrumentalness does not occur and/or the exchange occurs if the roentgenographicness does not occur. sent10: the instrumentalness does not occur if the instrumentalnessness or the exchange or both happens. sent11: that the maxillofacialness does not occur is right. sent12: the fact that the roentgenographicness occurs is correct if the exchange happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the headquartering barratry does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the headquartering barratry does not occur and/or the instrumentalness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the headquartering barratry happens.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the exchange occurs.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the roentgenographicness occurs.; sent1 & sent11 -> int6: both the misfiring and the fudging tinderbox happens.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the misfiring happens is true.; int5 & int7 -> int8: both the roentgenographicness and the misfiring happens.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the Alpineness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the Alpineness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the misfiring occurs and the fudging tinderbox occurs if the maxillofacialness does not occur. sent2: if that the concurrence does not occur is not incorrect then the fudging thane occurs and the nodularness occurs. sent3: the fudging tinderbox occurs. sent4: the fact that the headquartering barratry does not occur or the instrumentalness happens or both does not hold. sent5: the isometric does not occur. sent6: if the headquartering barratry happens the exchanging happens. sent7: the bonelessness occurs. sent8: that the roentgenographicness occurs and the misfire happens triggers that the Alpineness does not occur. sent9: the instrumentalness does not occur and/or the exchange occurs if the roentgenographicness does not occur. sent10: the instrumentalness does not occur if the instrumentalnessness or the exchange or both happens. sent11: that the maxillofacialness does not occur is right. sent12: the fact that the roentgenographicness occurs is correct if the exchange happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the headquartering barratry does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the headquartering barratry does not occur and/or the instrumentalness occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the headquartering barratry happens.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the exchange occurs.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the roentgenographicness occurs.; sent1 & sent11 -> int6: both the misfiring and the fudging tinderbox happens.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the misfiring happens is true.; int5 & int7 -> int8: both the roentgenographicness and the misfiring happens.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__