the islander is implausible.
sent1: the fact that the stewardess is the swindle if the stewardess is a PVC is not incorrect. sent2: the annualry is a PVC if the rotgut is a PVC. sent3: that something is not inconvertible and it is not floricultural is not correct if it is not a kind of a Psophocarpus. sent4: if that something does not nod grouch is correct it is not implausible. sent5: the geezer is not inconvertible if the red is not inconvertible. sent6: the fact that something is annexational and not a sluice does not hold if it is a swindle. sent7: if the tocopherol is a PVC the stewardess is a PVC. sent8: something is not inconvertible if the fact that it does crook tinsel and it does not cancel melodiousness is not correct. sent9: if there exists something such that it does cancel melodiousness the fact that the red crooks tinsel but it does not cancel melodiousness is false. sent10: the fact that the red crooks tinsel and it cancels melodiousness is incorrect. sent11: if there exists something such that that either it does nod grouch or it is inconvertible or both is not correct then that the islander is implausible is not false. sent12: if that something is annexational but it is not a kind of a sluice is not correct it is not a Psophocarpus. sent13: the southernwood is a PVC. sent14: something does cancel melodiousness. sent15: either the geezer does not nod grouch or it is not a A-list or both if there is something such that it is inconvertible. sent16: the tocopherol is a PVC if the annualry is a PVC. sent17: the fact that the rotgut is a PVC if the southernwood is a PVC is right. sent18: if the fact that that the stewardess is not inconvertible and it is not floricultural is true does not hold then the six-footer is inconvertible.
sent8 -> int1: the red is not inconvertible if that it crooks tinsel and does not cancel melodiousness is not true.; sent14 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the red does crook tinsel but it does not cancel melodiousness is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the red is not inconvertible.;
the fact that the islander is not implausible is correct.
sent4 -> int4: the islander is not implausible if it does not nod grouch.; sent3 -> int5: if the fact that the stewardess is not a Psophocarpus hold then the fact that it is not inconvertible and not floricultural is not true.; sent12 -> int6: the stewardess is not a kind of a Psophocarpus if that it is annexational and does not sluice is not correct.; sent6 -> int7: if the stewardess is a swindle then the fact that it is annexational and it is not a kind of a sluice does not hold.; sent17 & sent13 -> int8: the rotgut is a kind of a PVC.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the annualry is a PVC.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the tocopherol is a kind of a PVC.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the stewardess is a kind of a PVC.; sent1 & int11 -> int12: the stewardess is a swindle.; int7 & int12 -> int13: that the stewardess is annexational but not a sluice does not hold.; int6 & int13 -> int14: the stewardess is not a kind of a Psophocarpus.; int5 & int14 -> int15: that the stewardess is not inconvertible and it is not floricultural is not true.; sent18 & int15 -> int16: the six-footer is inconvertible.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is not convertible.; int17 & sent15 -> int18: the geezer does not nod grouch and/or it is not a A-list.; int18 -> int19: something does not nod grouch and/or is not a A-list.;
$hypothesis$ = the islander is implausible. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the stewardess is the swindle if the stewardess is a PVC is not incorrect. sent2: the annualry is a PVC if the rotgut is a PVC. sent3: that something is not inconvertible and it is not floricultural is not correct if it is not a kind of a Psophocarpus. sent4: if that something does not nod grouch is correct it is not implausible. sent5: the geezer is not inconvertible if the red is not inconvertible. sent6: the fact that something is annexational and not a sluice does not hold if it is a swindle. sent7: if the tocopherol is a PVC the stewardess is a PVC. sent8: something is not inconvertible if the fact that it does crook tinsel and it does not cancel melodiousness is not correct. sent9: if there exists something such that it does cancel melodiousness the fact that the red crooks tinsel but it does not cancel melodiousness is false. sent10: the fact that the red crooks tinsel and it cancels melodiousness is incorrect. sent11: if there exists something such that that either it does nod grouch or it is inconvertible or both is not correct then that the islander is implausible is not false. sent12: if that something is annexational but it is not a kind of a sluice is not correct it is not a Psophocarpus. sent13: the southernwood is a PVC. sent14: something does cancel melodiousness. sent15: either the geezer does not nod grouch or it is not a A-list or both if there is something such that it is inconvertible. sent16: the tocopherol is a PVC if the annualry is a PVC. sent17: the fact that the rotgut is a PVC if the southernwood is a PVC is right. sent18: if the fact that that the stewardess is not inconvertible and it is not floricultural is true does not hold then the six-footer is inconvertible. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the red is not inconvertible if that it crooks tinsel and does not cancel melodiousness is not true.; sent14 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the red does crook tinsel but it does not cancel melodiousness is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the red is not inconvertible.; __UNKNOWN__