that the clemency is not a tidemark but it is nonexempt is not right.
sent1: the tourniquet is nonexempt. sent2: the clemency does not lave if it is black-and-white. sent3: if the clemency is not black-and-white that the plane is a kind of a tidemark is not false. sent4: if something outgenerals confrontation it does not mummify. sent5: if a non-black-and-white thing is aeromechanic then it is a tidemark. sent6: if the clemency does not lave that the plane lave and/or it is not a nark is false. sent7: the plane does not lave if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nark or is aeromechanic or both is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the ovulation is a tidemark is not true. sent9: if something does not lave and does not mummify it is not black-and-white. sent10: the clemency is not a abampere. sent11: the clemency is aeromechanic if the plane is aeromechanic. sent12: the ovulation is black-and-white. sent13: if the clemency mummifies it is black-and-white. sent14: the fact that either the plane is a staggerer or it is not a bargain or both does not hold. sent15: the ovulation is not aeromechanic. sent16: if the witch-hunter is measurable then that either the ovulation is not a kind of a nark or it is aeromechanic or both is incorrect. sent17: if something is not a kind of a tidemark and is nonexempt it does mummify. sent18: that the plane does not mummify but it laves is incorrect. sent19: the clemency does not nark. sent20: the ovulation is aeromechanic if that either the plane laves or it does not nark or both is not true. sent21: if the fact that the plane is nonexempt or is not aeromechanic or both is incorrect then the ovulation is a kind of a nark. sent22: the clemency is liturgical.
sent17 -> int1: the clemency does mummify if it is not a tidemark and it is not exempt.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clemency is not a kind of a tidemark and is nonexempt.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the clemency does mummify.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the clemency is black-and-white.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the clemency does not lave.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the plane does lave and/or it does not nark is not correct.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the ovulation is aeromechanic.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the plane is catechistic and/or it is not black-and-white is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the clemency is not a tidemark but it is nonexempt is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the tourniquet is nonexempt. sent2: the clemency does not lave if it is black-and-white. sent3: if the clemency is not black-and-white that the plane is a kind of a tidemark is not false. sent4: if something outgenerals confrontation it does not mummify. sent5: if a non-black-and-white thing is aeromechanic then it is a tidemark. sent6: if the clemency does not lave that the plane lave and/or it is not a nark is false. sent7: the plane does not lave if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nark or is aeromechanic or both is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the ovulation is a tidemark is not true. sent9: if something does not lave and does not mummify it is not black-and-white. sent10: the clemency is not a abampere. sent11: the clemency is aeromechanic if the plane is aeromechanic. sent12: the ovulation is black-and-white. sent13: if the clemency mummifies it is black-and-white. sent14: the fact that either the plane is a staggerer or it is not a bargain or both does not hold. sent15: the ovulation is not aeromechanic. sent16: if the witch-hunter is measurable then that either the ovulation is not a kind of a nark or it is aeromechanic or both is incorrect. sent17: if something is not a kind of a tidemark and is nonexempt it does mummify. sent18: that the plane does not mummify but it laves is incorrect. sent19: the clemency does not nark. sent20: the ovulation is aeromechanic if that either the plane laves or it does not nark or both is not true. sent21: if the fact that the plane is nonexempt or is not aeromechanic or both is incorrect then the ovulation is a kind of a nark. sent22: the clemency is liturgical. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the clemency does mummify if it is not a tidemark and it is not exempt.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clemency is not a kind of a tidemark and is nonexempt.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the clemency does mummify.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the clemency is black-and-white.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the clemency does not lave.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the plane does lave and/or it does not nark is not correct.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the ovulation is aeromechanic.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__