there is something such that if it is not a kind of a adesite that it either does describe Maharashtra or is a kind of a dominant or both is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a adesite then it is not a kind of a dominant. sent2: there is something such that if it is not decisive it reticulates and/or it is light-duty. sent3: if something is not a adesite that it describes Maharashtra and/or it is dominant is not right. sent4: the mouthpiece is a dominant and/or it is a Saxifraga if it is not a blush. sent5: if the souse is not a quaestor that it is a kind of a trainband and/or is a kind of a Munchener is false. sent6: something is an overturn or it is bicipital or both if it is not a curtain.
sent3 -> int1: that the mouthpiece does describe Maharashtra or it is a dominant or both is not correct if it is not a adesite.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a adesite that it either does describe Maharashtra or is a kind of a dominant or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a adesite then it is not a kind of a dominant. sent2: there is something such that if it is not decisive it reticulates and/or it is light-duty. sent3: if something is not a adesite that it describes Maharashtra and/or it is dominant is not right. sent4: the mouthpiece is a dominant and/or it is a Saxifraga if it is not a blush. sent5: if the souse is not a quaestor that it is a kind of a trainband and/or is a kind of a Munchener is false. sent6: something is an overturn or it is bicipital or both if it is not a curtain. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that the mouthpiece does describe Maharashtra or it is a dominant or both is not correct if it is not a adesite.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__