the bopping aye-aye does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the bopping aye-aye does not occur and the bopping gendarmerie occurs is not correct if the battery occurs. sent2: if the fact that the semioticness happens and the aquatics happens is wrong then the aquatics does not occur. sent3: if the aquaticsness does not occur then either the bopping nondisjunction occurs or the lockup does not occur or both. sent4: that the bopping gendarmerie does not occur triggers that the undressing efficiency and the attributableness happens. sent5: if the unattributableness does not occur the bopping aye-aye does not occur. sent6: the bopping gendarmerie does not occur. sent7: the cuddling does not occur if the fact that the bopping aye-aye does not occur and the bopping gendarmerie happens is not true.
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the undressing efficiency but not the unattributableness happens.; int1 -> int2: the unattributableness does not occur.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the cuddling does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the bopping aye-aye does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bopping aye-aye does not occur and the bopping gendarmerie occurs is not correct if the battery occurs. sent2: if the fact that the semioticness happens and the aquatics happens is wrong then the aquatics does not occur. sent3: if the aquaticsness does not occur then either the bopping nondisjunction occurs or the lockup does not occur or both. sent4: that the bopping gendarmerie does not occur triggers that the undressing efficiency and the attributableness happens. sent5: if the unattributableness does not occur the bopping aye-aye does not occur. sent6: the bopping gendarmerie does not occur. sent7: the cuddling does not occur if the fact that the bopping aye-aye does not occur and the bopping gendarmerie happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the undressing efficiency but not the unattributableness happens.; int1 -> int2: the unattributableness does not occur.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__