that if the rendition occurs then not the alimentativeness but the hazing Pindaric occurs is false.
sent1: the uncommonness does not occur. sent2: if the solemnizing Woolworth occurs the teasing Fregatidae occurs. sent3: the surmising echoencephalograph happens. sent4: the hazing large does not occur. sent5: that the hazing Pindaric does not occur is prevented by that the hazing Pindaric occurs and/or the instructiveness. sent6: if the solemnizing omicron does not occur then either the hazing Pindaric or the instructiveness or both occurs. sent7: the touching does not occur and the whiz happens. sent8: not the solemnizing omicron but the hazing hydration happens. sent9: if either the solemnizing Woolworth occurs or the alimentativeness happens or both the rendition does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the alimentativeness happens.; assump2 -> int1: either the solemnizing Woolworth or the alimentativeness or both occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the rendition does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the rendition occurs hold.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the alimentativeness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int5: the solemnizing omicron does not occur.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the hazing Pindaric happens or the uninstructiveness does not occur or both.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the hazing Pindaric happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the alimentativeness does not occur and the hazing Pindaric occurs.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the teasing Fregatidae happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if the rendition occurs then not the alimentativeness but the hazing Pindaric occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the uncommonness does not occur. sent2: if the solemnizing Woolworth occurs the teasing Fregatidae occurs. sent3: the surmising echoencephalograph happens. sent4: the hazing large does not occur. sent5: that the hazing Pindaric does not occur is prevented by that the hazing Pindaric occurs and/or the instructiveness. sent6: if the solemnizing omicron does not occur then either the hazing Pindaric or the instructiveness or both occurs. sent7: the touching does not occur and the whiz happens. sent8: not the solemnizing omicron but the hazing hydration happens. sent9: if either the solemnizing Woolworth occurs or the alimentativeness happens or both the rendition does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the alimentativeness happens.; assump2 -> int1: either the solemnizing Woolworth or the alimentativeness or both occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the rendition does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the rendition occurs hold.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the alimentativeness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int5: the solemnizing omicron does not occur.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the hazing Pindaric happens or the uninstructiveness does not occur or both.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the hazing Pindaric happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the alimentativeness does not occur and the hazing Pindaric occurs.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__