the colonialism does not occur.
sent1: that that the joylessness occurs and the hydrolyzing occurs is incorrect hold. sent2: if that the mimicry does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the evolutionariness and the rivaling corduroy happens hold. sent3: if that the amnesty but not the colonialism occurs does not hold then the arbitrativeness does not occur. sent4: the easiness happens if the actinicness happens. sent5: that the joylessness but not the hydrolyzing occurs does not hold. sent6: the commune does not occur if the rivaling Cataflam does not occur. sent7: the fact that the amnesty but not the colonialism occurs does not hold if the commutating thwack happens. sent8: if the falsification occurs the fact that the plunk does not occur and the cachinnating does not occur is false. sent9: if the evolutionariness happens then the fact that the bacteroidalness happens but the rivaling Aaron does not occur is not right. sent10: if the reparation does not occur and the lip occurs the rivaling Cataflam does not occur. sent11: the shooting amelioration is prevented by the easiness. sent12: that the commune does not occur leads to that the mimicry does not occur and the consecrating does not occur. sent13: the amnestying does not occur if the hydrolyzing occurs. sent14: the amnestying does not occur if the fact that that the joylessness occurs but the hydrolyzing does not occur hold is not correct. sent15: if the fact that the plunk does not occur and the cachinnating does not occur is not right then the masonicness does not occur. sent16: if the shooting amelioration does not occur and/or the commutating thwack does not occur the commutating thwack does not occur. sent17: the actinicness happens if the fact that the fact that the bacteroidalness happens but the rivaling Aaron does not occur hold is wrong. sent18: not the reparation but the lip occurs if the masonicness does not occur. sent19: the shooting amelioration does not occur or the commutating thwack does not occur or both. sent20: that the colonialism does not occur and the amnestying does not occur is incorrect if that the commutating thwack does not occur is correct. sent21: the shooting amelioration does not occur and/or the commutating thwack occurs.
sent14 & sent5 -> int1: that the amnesty does not occur is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the colonialism does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the colonialism does not occur and the amnesty does not occur.; sent16 & sent19 -> int3: the commutating thwack does not occur.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the colonialism does not occur and the amnestying does not occur is false.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the arbitrativeness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the colonialism does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the joylessness occurs and the hydrolyzing occurs is incorrect hold. sent2: if that the mimicry does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the evolutionariness and the rivaling corduroy happens hold. sent3: if that the amnesty but not the colonialism occurs does not hold then the arbitrativeness does not occur. sent4: the easiness happens if the actinicness happens. sent5: that the joylessness but not the hydrolyzing occurs does not hold. sent6: the commune does not occur if the rivaling Cataflam does not occur. sent7: the fact that the amnesty but not the colonialism occurs does not hold if the commutating thwack happens. sent8: if the falsification occurs the fact that the plunk does not occur and the cachinnating does not occur is false. sent9: if the evolutionariness happens then the fact that the bacteroidalness happens but the rivaling Aaron does not occur is not right. sent10: if the reparation does not occur and the lip occurs the rivaling Cataflam does not occur. sent11: the shooting amelioration is prevented by the easiness. sent12: that the commune does not occur leads to that the mimicry does not occur and the consecrating does not occur. sent13: the amnestying does not occur if the hydrolyzing occurs. sent14: the amnestying does not occur if the fact that that the joylessness occurs but the hydrolyzing does not occur hold is not correct. sent15: if the fact that the plunk does not occur and the cachinnating does not occur is not right then the masonicness does not occur. sent16: if the shooting amelioration does not occur and/or the commutating thwack does not occur the commutating thwack does not occur. sent17: the actinicness happens if the fact that the fact that the bacteroidalness happens but the rivaling Aaron does not occur hold is wrong. sent18: not the reparation but the lip occurs if the masonicness does not occur. sent19: the shooting amelioration does not occur or the commutating thwack does not occur or both. sent20: that the colonialism does not occur and the amnestying does not occur is incorrect if that the commutating thwack does not occur is correct. sent21: the shooting amelioration does not occur and/or the commutating thwack occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent5 -> int1: that the amnesty does not occur is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the colonialism does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the colonialism does not occur and the amnesty does not occur.; sent16 & sent19 -> int3: the commutating thwack does not occur.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the colonialism does not occur and the amnestying does not occur is false.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__