the fact that there is something such that if it is sacral that the fact that it is not a kind of a Zola and it settles Padda is true is not correct is not correct.
sent1: if something is sacral that it is a Zola and it does settle Padda is incorrect. sent2: that something is non-diastolic but it settles increased is false if it is a Theophrastus. sent3: if the horseradish is sacral the fact that it is a kind of a Zola that does settle Padda does not hold. sent4: that the horseradish is not sacral and is a kind of a render is incorrect if the fact that it settles XYY hold. sent5: the horseradish is not a Zola but it settles Padda if it is not non-sacral. sent6: if the fact that the bib-and-tucker is a kind of a rivet is right then the fact that it does not settle Padda and emblazons Meredith is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is not non-sacral it is not a Zola and does settle Padda. sent8: that there is something such that if it is sacral then the fact that it is a Zola that settles Padda is false hold. sent9: if something is sacral then it is not a kind of a Zola and it does settle Padda. sent10: if something is sacral then the fact that it is not a kind of a Zola and does settle Padda is not right. sent11: if the cyclotron initiates orchiopexy then the fact that it does not flee and it does settle Padda does not hold. sent12: if something is on-line the fact that it is both non-re-entrant and intimal is incorrect.
sent10 -> int1: that the horseradish is not a Zola and does settle Padda does not hold if it is sacral.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the sneerer is a Theophrastus that it is a kind of non-diastolic thing that does settle increased is false.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is sacral that the fact that it is not a kind of a Zola and it settles Padda is true is not correct is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is sacral that it is a Zola and it does settle Padda is incorrect. sent2: that something is non-diastolic but it settles increased is false if it is a Theophrastus. sent3: if the horseradish is sacral the fact that it is a kind of a Zola that does settle Padda does not hold. sent4: that the horseradish is not sacral and is a kind of a render is incorrect if the fact that it settles XYY hold. sent5: the horseradish is not a Zola but it settles Padda if it is not non-sacral. sent6: if the fact that the bib-and-tucker is a kind of a rivet is right then the fact that it does not settle Padda and emblazons Meredith is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is not non-sacral it is not a Zola and does settle Padda. sent8: that there is something such that if it is sacral then the fact that it is a Zola that settles Padda is false hold. sent9: if something is sacral then it is not a kind of a Zola and it does settle Padda. sent10: if something is sacral then the fact that it is not a kind of a Zola and does settle Padda is not right. sent11: if the cyclotron initiates orchiopexy then the fact that it does not flee and it does settle Padda does not hold. sent12: if something is on-line the fact that it is both non-re-entrant and intimal is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: that the horseradish is not a Zola and does settle Padda does not hold if it is sacral.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__