the fact that the humanities is an omission that does upgrade agapanthus does not hold.
sent1: The masjid does tinge save-all. sent2: the save-all does tinge Saba if there is something such that that it upgrades agapanthus and/or it is an omission is wrong. sent3: the humanities is not gastronomic if something either is not gastronomic or is not a kind of a Yellowstone or both. sent4: if the save-all does tinge masjid it normalizes humanities. sent5: if the fact that the thoroughfare is not a kind of a Wyler and tinges broad-bean is incorrect then it does not park. sent6: the fact that the commentator does not tinge Saba is right if the thoroughfare is not a Wyler and tinges broad-bean. sent7: the save-all does tinge masjid. sent8: if the thoroughfare is not a kind of a ambiversion the fact that the agapanthus normalizes humanities and it upgrades thoroughfare does not hold. sent9: the save-all is not a ambiversion if the thoroughfare does not park. sent10: the fact that either the commentator does upgrade agapanthus or it is a kind of an omission or both does not hold if the humanities is not gastronomic. sent11: something is a ambiversion if that it normalizes humanities hold. sent12: there is something such that it is either not gastronomic or not a Yellowstone or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the thoroughfare is not a kind of a Wyler but it tinges broad-bean is false.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the thoroughfare is not a park.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the save-all is not a ambiversion is not incorrect.; sent11 -> int3: if the save-all does normalize humanities then it is a ambiversion.; sent4 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the save-all does normalize humanities hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the save-all is a kind of a ambiversion hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the thoroughfare is not a Wyler and does tinge broad-bean.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the commentator does not tinge Saba.;
the fact that the agapanthus normalizes humanities and does upgrade thoroughfare is not right.
sent12 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the humanities is gastronomic is not true.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: that the commentator upgrades agapanthus and/or it is a kind of an omission is wrong.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it upgrades agapanthus and/or it is an omission does not hold.; int11 & sent2 -> int12: the save-all does tinge Saba.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the humanities is an omission that does upgrade agapanthus does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: The masjid does tinge save-all. sent2: the save-all does tinge Saba if there is something such that that it upgrades agapanthus and/or it is an omission is wrong. sent3: the humanities is not gastronomic if something either is not gastronomic or is not a kind of a Yellowstone or both. sent4: if the save-all does tinge masjid it normalizes humanities. sent5: if the fact that the thoroughfare is not a kind of a Wyler and tinges broad-bean is incorrect then it does not park. sent6: the fact that the commentator does not tinge Saba is right if the thoroughfare is not a Wyler and tinges broad-bean. sent7: the save-all does tinge masjid. sent8: if the thoroughfare is not a kind of a ambiversion the fact that the agapanthus normalizes humanities and it upgrades thoroughfare does not hold. sent9: the save-all is not a ambiversion if the thoroughfare does not park. sent10: the fact that either the commentator does upgrade agapanthus or it is a kind of an omission or both does not hold if the humanities is not gastronomic. sent11: something is a ambiversion if that it normalizes humanities hold. sent12: there is something such that it is either not gastronomic or not a Yellowstone or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the thoroughfare is not a kind of a Wyler but it tinges broad-bean is false.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the thoroughfare is not a park.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the save-all is not a ambiversion is not incorrect.; sent11 -> int3: if the save-all does normalize humanities then it is a ambiversion.; sent4 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the save-all does normalize humanities hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the save-all is a kind of a ambiversion hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the thoroughfare is not a Wyler and does tinge broad-bean.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the commentator does not tinge Saba.; __UNKNOWN__