there is something such that that it pares UHF and is not Modern is incorrect.
sent1: if the Hanuman is unidentifiable then it does not sting and it is starchy. sent2: if the Medoc pares UHF but it is not Modern then the dummy is insensible. sent3: if the fact that the dummy does not arouse is true then it does not wend. sent4: the Hanuman does not sting. sent5: the fact that the Hanuman is a sting and is starchy does not hold. sent6: the fact that the Hanuman is not a kind of a sting but it is starchy does not hold if that the dummy does not wend hold. sent7: the fact that the Medoc does pare UHF and it is Modern is not correct. sent8: that the Hanuman is not a kind of a sting is not wrong if the fact that it is unidentifiable is true. sent9: the Hanuman is unidentifiable if the kingbird is a NIMBY. sent10: the fact that something is non-branchial thing that arouses is incorrect if it is insensible. sent11: the fact that the kingbird is a NIMBY is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Medoc pares UHF and is not Modern hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the dummy is insensible.; sent10 -> int2: if the dummy is insensible the fact that it is non-branchial thing that arouses is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dummy is not branchial but it does arouse is not true.; sent9 & sent11 -> int4: that the Hanuman is unidentifiable hold.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the Hanuman does not sting but it is starchy.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that that it pares UHF and is not Modern is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Hanuman is unidentifiable then it does not sting and it is starchy. sent2: if the Medoc pares UHF but it is not Modern then the dummy is insensible. sent3: if the fact that the dummy does not arouse is true then it does not wend. sent4: the Hanuman does not sting. sent5: the fact that the Hanuman is a sting and is starchy does not hold. sent6: the fact that the Hanuman is not a kind of a sting but it is starchy does not hold if that the dummy does not wend hold. sent7: the fact that the Medoc does pare UHF and it is Modern is not correct. sent8: that the Hanuman is not a kind of a sting is not wrong if the fact that it is unidentifiable is true. sent9: the Hanuman is unidentifiable if the kingbird is a NIMBY. sent10: the fact that something is non-branchial thing that arouses is incorrect if it is insensible. sent11: the fact that the kingbird is a NIMBY is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Medoc pares UHF and is not Modern hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the dummy is insensible.; sent10 -> int2: if the dummy is insensible the fact that it is non-branchial thing that arouses is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dummy is not branchial but it does arouse is not true.; sent9 & sent11 -> int4: that the Hanuman is unidentifiable hold.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the Hanuman does not sting but it is starchy.; __UNKNOWN__