the northeast is both a mensch and not non-Malawian.
sent1: that something is a mensch and Malawian is not right if it does not angle. sent2: the ombudsman does not usher suavity if the fact that the ankle is eosinophilic but it is not washable is not right. sent3: if the fact that something does not segregate gerund and is a speciousness is not true then it segregate gerund. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is either postmenopausal or a hostility or both does not hold. sent5: if something does not animate then the fact that it is not an angle is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the samisen animates but it is not an angle is wrong. sent7: if the appendicle is an angle then the initiate is not postmenopausal. sent8: the reluctance ushers suavity and is a speciousness if the fact that the ankle is not eosinophilic is true. sent9: if the initiate does segregate gerund the appendicle does segregate gerund. sent10: the fact that if there is something such that that it is postmenopausal and/or it is a hostility is false then the ankle is not eosinophilic is true. sent11: if something does not usher suavity and/or it segregates gerund it is unanimated. sent12: something does not segregate gerund if it does usher dimensionality and does not exhilarate northeast. sent13: the reluctance is a kind of a speciousness if the ankle is not eosinophilic. sent14: the northeast does usher luger but it does not embower oximeter. sent15: that the samisen is thalloid but it is not an angle is incorrect if the initiate does not animate. sent16: that something does not segregate gerund and is a kind of a speciousness does not hold if it is not washable. sent17: the initiate is not washable if the samisen is washable. sent18: the northeast is not a kind of an angle if the appendicle is not non-thalloid or not an angle or both. sent19: if the fact that the samisen is both not a hostility and not eosinophilic is wrong then it is washable. sent20: if the appendicle does not segregate gerund that the ombudsman does not segregate gerund but it is washable is not correct. sent21: the northeast is a kind of a Malawian. sent22: the appendicle ushers dimensionality. sent23: the reluctance does not usher suavity if the fact that that the samisen is thalloid thing that is not a kind of an angle hold is not true. sent24: the initiate is not animated if that the appendicle ushers dimensionality and does not exhilarate northeast is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the appendicle does usher dimensionality and does not exhilarate northeast does not hold.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the initiate does not animate.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: that the samisen is thalloid but not an angle is wrong.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the reluctance does not usher suavity.; sent4 & sent10 -> int4: that the ankle is not eosinophilic hold.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the reluctance does usher suavity and is a kind of a speciousness.; int5 -> int6: the reluctance does usher suavity.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the appendicle does usher dimensionality and does not exhilarate northeast.; sent12 -> int9: if the appendicle does usher dimensionality but it does not exhilarate northeast then it does not segregate gerund.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the appendicle does segregate gerund is wrong.; int10 & sent20 -> int11: the fact that the ombudsman does not segregate gerund but it is washable is not true.;
that the northeast is a mensch that is Malawian does not hold.
sent1 -> int12: the fact that the northeast is a mensch that is a Malawian is not correct if it is not a kind of an angle.; sent5 -> int13: the appendicle is not an angle if it does not animate.; sent11 -> int14: if either the appendicle does not usher suavity or it does segregate gerund or both then it does not animate.; sent3 -> int15: the initiate does segregate gerund if that that it does not segregate gerund and is a kind of a speciousness hold is incorrect.; sent16 -> int16: the fact that the initiate does not segregate gerund and is a speciousness is false if the fact that it is not washable hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the northeast is both a mensch and not non-Malawian. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a mensch and Malawian is not right if it does not angle. sent2: the ombudsman does not usher suavity if the fact that the ankle is eosinophilic but it is not washable is not right. sent3: if the fact that something does not segregate gerund and is a speciousness is not true then it segregate gerund. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is either postmenopausal or a hostility or both does not hold. sent5: if something does not animate then the fact that it is not an angle is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the samisen animates but it is not an angle is wrong. sent7: if the appendicle is an angle then the initiate is not postmenopausal. sent8: the reluctance ushers suavity and is a speciousness if the fact that the ankle is not eosinophilic is true. sent9: if the initiate does segregate gerund the appendicle does segregate gerund. sent10: the fact that if there is something such that that it is postmenopausal and/or it is a hostility is false then the ankle is not eosinophilic is true. sent11: if something does not usher suavity and/or it segregates gerund it is unanimated. sent12: something does not segregate gerund if it does usher dimensionality and does not exhilarate northeast. sent13: the reluctance is a kind of a speciousness if the ankle is not eosinophilic. sent14: the northeast does usher luger but it does not embower oximeter. sent15: that the samisen is thalloid but it is not an angle is incorrect if the initiate does not animate. sent16: that something does not segregate gerund and is a kind of a speciousness does not hold if it is not washable. sent17: the initiate is not washable if the samisen is washable. sent18: the northeast is not a kind of an angle if the appendicle is not non-thalloid or not an angle or both. sent19: if the fact that the samisen is both not a hostility and not eosinophilic is wrong then it is washable. sent20: if the appendicle does not segregate gerund that the ombudsman does not segregate gerund but it is washable is not correct. sent21: the northeast is a kind of a Malawian. sent22: the appendicle ushers dimensionality. sent23: the reluctance does not usher suavity if the fact that that the samisen is thalloid thing that is not a kind of an angle hold is not true. sent24: the initiate is not animated if that the appendicle ushers dimensionality and does not exhilarate northeast is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the appendicle does usher dimensionality and does not exhilarate northeast does not hold.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the initiate does not animate.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: that the samisen is thalloid but not an angle is wrong.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the reluctance does not usher suavity.; sent4 & sent10 -> int4: that the ankle is not eosinophilic hold.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the reluctance does usher suavity and is a kind of a speciousness.; int5 -> int6: the reluctance does usher suavity.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the appendicle does usher dimensionality and does not exhilarate northeast.; sent12 -> int9: if the appendicle does usher dimensionality but it does not exhilarate northeast then it does not segregate gerund.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the appendicle does segregate gerund is wrong.; int10 & sent20 -> int11: the fact that the ombudsman does not segregate gerund but it is washable is not true.; __UNKNOWN__