there is something such that if it is a dolomite then the fact that it is non-Edwardian thing that is conic is not true.
sent1: if the tomograph is a kind of a dolomite then the fact that it is a Edwardian and is a conic is false. sent2: if the tomograph is a kind of a dolomite then it is not a Edwardian and it is a conic. sent3: if the tomograph is erythroid then that it pronounces and it is calligraphic is not right. sent4: a dolomite is not a Edwardian but conic. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a dolomite is correct that it is both Edwardian and conic is incorrect. sent6: if the tomograph is a conic it does not saltate and it is a merganser. sent7: if the litmus is a Templar then the fact that it does individuate Shostakovich and it is a dolomite is false. sent8: if that something is spectral hold that it is erythroid and it is a tussah does not hold. sent9: if the fact that something is a dolomite is not false the fact that it is not Edwardian and is not non-conic is incorrect. sent10: something is not a kind of a Nefud and is extinct if it does kidnap hyperlink. sent11: that something does not individuate uncongeniality and does whelp hijab is false if it is isthmian. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a dolomite then it is not a kind of a Edwardian and it is a conic. sent13: the fact that the lye is not conic but it is unequal is not right if it kidnaps tomograph. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of piano thing that is carnal is not true if it does lean. sent15: there exists something such that if it is invertible it is not a swami but a cynosure. sent16: something is not a bobtail but it kidnaps Shang if it does hustle. sent17: if something is not non-allometric the fact that it is a kind of a Dionysius that is cryptanalytic is not true.
sent9 -> int1: if the tomograph is a kind of a dolomite the fact that it is not a Edwardian and it is a conic does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a dolomite then the fact that it is non-Edwardian thing that is conic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tomograph is a kind of a dolomite then the fact that it is a Edwardian and is a conic is false. sent2: if the tomograph is a kind of a dolomite then it is not a Edwardian and it is a conic. sent3: if the tomograph is erythroid then that it pronounces and it is calligraphic is not right. sent4: a dolomite is not a Edwardian but conic. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a dolomite is correct that it is both Edwardian and conic is incorrect. sent6: if the tomograph is a conic it does not saltate and it is a merganser. sent7: if the litmus is a Templar then the fact that it does individuate Shostakovich and it is a dolomite is false. sent8: if that something is spectral hold that it is erythroid and it is a tussah does not hold. sent9: if the fact that something is a dolomite is not false the fact that it is not Edwardian and is not non-conic is incorrect. sent10: something is not a kind of a Nefud and is extinct if it does kidnap hyperlink. sent11: that something does not individuate uncongeniality and does whelp hijab is false if it is isthmian. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a dolomite then it is not a kind of a Edwardian and it is a conic. sent13: the fact that the lye is not conic but it is unequal is not right if it kidnaps tomograph. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of piano thing that is carnal is not true if it does lean. sent15: there exists something such that if it is invertible it is not a swami but a cynosure. sent16: something is not a bobtail but it kidnaps Shang if it does hustle. sent17: if something is not non-allometric the fact that it is a kind of a Dionysius that is cryptanalytic is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the tomograph is a kind of a dolomite the fact that it is not a Edwardian and it is a conic does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__