that the stob is not Apocryphal and/or is a Tenoretic does not hold.
sent1: the microphoning is Apocryphal. sent2: if the fact that the stob does not force Shepard is not false the fact that it does not purify Maxostoma or is trabecular or both is not true. sent3: the fact that something is not Apocryphal and/or it is a kind of a Tenoretic is wrong if it does not force Shepard. sent4: if something is not a hook and/or it is trabecular then it does not purify enamel. sent5: that something does scourge seemliness or it purifies Maxostoma or both is wrong if it is not a cayuse. sent6: the waxflower is a lister if it is a right-handedness. sent7: the stob is not significant and/or does purify enamel. sent8: the microphoning does purify Maxostoma and it does purify enamel if it does not scourge seemliness. sent9: if something does not purify Maxostoma or it is a kind of a hook or both it is not a kind of a Tenoretic. sent10: if something is a kind of a lister then that it is not a cayuse and it is not intracerebral is not right. sent11: if that something scourges seemliness and/or it does purify Maxostoma is incorrect it does not purify enamel. sent12: the saver is trabecular. sent13: the stob does hook. sent14: if the fact that the waxflower is not a cayuse and is not intracerebral is wrong then the bun is not a kind of a cayuse. sent15: that the microphoning is not a slash and/or it scourges stob is incorrect. sent16: the microphoning vaults aired if it is not a Tenoretic. sent17: the stob is not trabecular. sent18: the stob is a kind of a redneck and does vault corm. sent19: the microphoning is a webbing. sent20: the fact that the microphoning does not scourge seemliness is right. sent21: if the whitecup does not force Shepard the stob is not Apocryphal and/or it is a Tenoretic. sent22: The fact that the seemliness does not scourge microphoning is right. sent23: the stob is a footstep and scourges comprehensiveness. sent24: if the fact that the bun does not purify enamel is correct then the whitecup does not force Shepard.
sent4 -> int1: if the microphoning is not a kind of a hook and/or it is trabecular it does not purify enamel.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the microphoning is not a hook or trabecular or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the microphoning does not purify enamel is not false.; sent8 & sent20 -> int3: the microphoning purifies Maxostoma and it purifies enamel.; int3 -> int4: the microphoning purifies enamel.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the microphoning is not a hook and/or it is trabecular is not right.; sent3 -> int7: if the stob does not force Shepard then that either it is not Apocryphal or it is a Tenoretic or both is not true.;
the stob is not Apocryphal and/or it is a kind of a Tenoretic.
sent11 -> int8: if the fact that the bun scourges seemliness and/or it purifies Maxostoma is not true then it does not purify enamel.; sent5 -> int9: that the bun does scourge seemliness and/or it does purify Maxostoma is false if it is not a cayuse.; sent10 -> int10: that the waxflower is both not a cayuse and not intracerebral is not correct if it is a kind of a lister.;
$hypothesis$ = that the stob is not Apocryphal and/or is a Tenoretic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the microphoning is Apocryphal. sent2: if the fact that the stob does not force Shepard is not false the fact that it does not purify Maxostoma or is trabecular or both is not true. sent3: the fact that something is not Apocryphal and/or it is a kind of a Tenoretic is wrong if it does not force Shepard. sent4: if something is not a hook and/or it is trabecular then it does not purify enamel. sent5: that something does scourge seemliness or it purifies Maxostoma or both is wrong if it is not a cayuse. sent6: the waxflower is a lister if it is a right-handedness. sent7: the stob is not significant and/or does purify enamel. sent8: the microphoning does purify Maxostoma and it does purify enamel if it does not scourge seemliness. sent9: if something does not purify Maxostoma or it is a kind of a hook or both it is not a kind of a Tenoretic. sent10: if something is a kind of a lister then that it is not a cayuse and it is not intracerebral is not right. sent11: if that something scourges seemliness and/or it does purify Maxostoma is incorrect it does not purify enamel. sent12: the saver is trabecular. sent13: the stob does hook. sent14: if the fact that the waxflower is not a cayuse and is not intracerebral is wrong then the bun is not a kind of a cayuse. sent15: that the microphoning is not a slash and/or it scourges stob is incorrect. sent16: the microphoning vaults aired if it is not a Tenoretic. sent17: the stob is not trabecular. sent18: the stob is a kind of a redneck and does vault corm. sent19: the microphoning is a webbing. sent20: the fact that the microphoning does not scourge seemliness is right. sent21: if the whitecup does not force Shepard the stob is not Apocryphal and/or it is a Tenoretic. sent22: The fact that the seemliness does not scourge microphoning is right. sent23: the stob is a footstep and scourges comprehensiveness. sent24: if the fact that the bun does not purify enamel is correct then the whitecup does not force Shepard. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the microphoning is not a kind of a hook and/or it is trabecular it does not purify enamel.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the microphoning is not a hook or trabecular or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the microphoning does not purify enamel is not false.; sent8 & sent20 -> int3: the microphoning purifies Maxostoma and it purifies enamel.; int3 -> int4: the microphoning purifies enamel.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the microphoning is not a hook and/or it is trabecular is not right.; sent3 -> int7: if the stob does not force Shepard then that either it is not Apocryphal or it is a Tenoretic or both is not true.; __UNKNOWN__