that there is something such that if it is sugary and does not overturn Epistle that it is not a nursery is true is wrong.
sent1: if something that is unenthusiastic does not average Amygdalus then it does not comfort. sent2: there exists something such that if it is sugary and it overturns Epistle then it is not a nursery. sent3: if the fact that the hairbrush is sugary thing that does not overturn Epistle hold it is not a nursery. sent4: the fact that the squire is not amphibious is correct if it is a kind of avascular thing that overturns monochrome. sent5: there is something such that if it is animalistic and it does not play eccentric it does overturn diemaker.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is unenthusiastic and does not average Amygdalus it does not comfort.
sent1 -> int1: if the avenue is unenthusiastic but it does not average Amygdalus then it is not a comfort.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is sugary and does not overturn Epistle that it is not a nursery is true is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is unenthusiastic does not average Amygdalus then it does not comfort. sent2: there exists something such that if it is sugary and it overturns Epistle then it is not a nursery. sent3: if the fact that the hairbrush is sugary thing that does not overturn Epistle hold it is not a nursery. sent4: the fact that the squire is not amphibious is correct if it is a kind of avascular thing that overturns monochrome. sent5: there is something such that if it is animalistic and it does not play eccentric it does overturn diemaker. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__