that there is something such that it does not nod Melinae is wrong.
sent1: the proctoscope is a seafood and it cancels approver. sent2: the inhalant is a seafood. sent3: if the insect does contradistinguish inhalant and is a posse the imperialist is not a kind of a Beatrice. sent4: the imperialist does contradistinguish inhalant. sent5: the insect is arteriolar if it is a posse and it is not a Wayne. sent6: the proctoscope is not a seafood if the insect is a Beatrice but it does not contradistinguish inhalant. sent7: the insect cancels insect if it is a posse that is not a Wayne. sent8: if the insect does slight and does cancel insect then the fact that the imperialist is not arteriolar is right. sent9: something that is not arteriolar does not nod Melinae. sent10: the anole slights. sent11: the insect is a posse that is not a Wayne. sent12: if the fact that the insect is a kind of a Beatrice but it does not contradistinguish inhalant is not true that it slights is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the insect is a Beatrice but it does not contradistinguish inhalant.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the proctoscope is not a seafood.; sent1 -> int2: that the proctoscope is a seafood is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the insect is a Beatrice that does not contradistinguish inhalant is not right.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the insect slights.; sent7 & sent11 -> int6: the insect cancels insect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the insect slights and it cancels insect.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the imperialist is not arteriolar.; sent9 -> int9: that if the imperialist is not arteriolar the imperialist does not nod Melinae is not false.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the imperialist does not nod Melinae.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that it does not nod Melinae is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the proctoscope is a seafood and it cancels approver. sent2: the inhalant is a seafood. sent3: if the insect does contradistinguish inhalant and is a posse the imperialist is not a kind of a Beatrice. sent4: the imperialist does contradistinguish inhalant. sent5: the insect is arteriolar if it is a posse and it is not a Wayne. sent6: the proctoscope is not a seafood if the insect is a Beatrice but it does not contradistinguish inhalant. sent7: the insect cancels insect if it is a posse that is not a Wayne. sent8: if the insect does slight and does cancel insect then the fact that the imperialist is not arteriolar is right. sent9: something that is not arteriolar does not nod Melinae. sent10: the anole slights. sent11: the insect is a posse that is not a Wayne. sent12: if the fact that the insect is a kind of a Beatrice but it does not contradistinguish inhalant is not true that it slights is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the insect is a Beatrice but it does not contradistinguish inhalant.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the proctoscope is not a seafood.; sent1 -> int2: that the proctoscope is a seafood is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the insect is a Beatrice that does not contradistinguish inhalant is not right.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the insect slights.; sent7 & sent11 -> int6: the insect cancels insect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the insect slights and it cancels insect.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the imperialist is not arteriolar.; sent9 -> int9: that if the imperialist is not arteriolar the imperialist does not nod Melinae is not false.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the imperialist does not nod Melinae.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__