the fact that the mentioner lurches patron and it is a rune is false.
sent1: the cefoperazone is non-liliaceous and/or it is a awned if there exists something such that it is not non-liliaceous. sent2: if something that is not precise is unclear then the mill-girl is not liliaceous. sent3: the mentioner is a rune if the adenoid is a awned. sent4: if something is unclear then the fact that the adenoid does not carol Yerevan is not false. sent5: the naif is not liliaceous if that the cefoperazone is not liliaceous and/or it is a kind of a awned hold. sent6: the adenoid does carol Yerevan if it is liliaceous. sent7: if the quadriplegic does not carol Yerevan the adenoid does not lurch patron. sent8: the adenoid is liliaceous if the fact that it is not diploid and it is not a Ranger is false. sent9: the quadriplegic is unclear. sent10: the fact that the adenoid is translunar is not incorrect if it is non-diploid thing that is not a kind of a Ranger. sent11: The plumbism does not cope mentioner. sent12: the mentioner does not cope plumbism. sent13: if something copes plumbism it is not precise and it is unclear. sent14: if something does not cope plumbism it is precise. sent15: the ommatidium does not carol Yerevan and it is non-translunar if the naif is not liliaceous. sent16: if that the adenoid is translunar is correct it is a kind of a awned. sent17: that if the blinks is attractive then the blinks copes plumbism and is not a cronyism is not wrong. sent18: the quadriplegic does not carol Yerevan if the ommatidium does not carol Yerevan and is not translunar. sent19: if something does not cope plumbism it lurches patron and it is precise.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the adenoid is not a kind of a diploid and it is not a Ranger does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the adenoid is liliaceous.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the adenoid does carol Yerevan.; sent9 -> int3: something is unclear.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the adenoid does not carol Yerevan.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the adenoid is not a diploid and it is not a kind of a Ranger.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the adenoid is translunar.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the adenoid is a awned.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the mentioner is a rune.; sent19 -> int10: that the mentioner lurches patron and is precise is not false if it does not cope plumbism.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the mentioner lurches patron and it is precise.; int11 -> int12: the mentioner does lurch patron.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the mentioner does lurch patron and it is a kind of a rune is not right.
sent13 -> int13: the blinks is not precise but it is unclear if it does cope plumbism.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mentioner lurches patron and it is a rune is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the cefoperazone is non-liliaceous and/or it is a awned if there exists something such that it is not non-liliaceous. sent2: if something that is not precise is unclear then the mill-girl is not liliaceous. sent3: the mentioner is a rune if the adenoid is a awned. sent4: if something is unclear then the fact that the adenoid does not carol Yerevan is not false. sent5: the naif is not liliaceous if that the cefoperazone is not liliaceous and/or it is a kind of a awned hold. sent6: the adenoid does carol Yerevan if it is liliaceous. sent7: if the quadriplegic does not carol Yerevan the adenoid does not lurch patron. sent8: the adenoid is liliaceous if the fact that it is not diploid and it is not a Ranger is false. sent9: the quadriplegic is unclear. sent10: the fact that the adenoid is translunar is not incorrect if it is non-diploid thing that is not a kind of a Ranger. sent11: The plumbism does not cope mentioner. sent12: the mentioner does not cope plumbism. sent13: if something copes plumbism it is not precise and it is unclear. sent14: if something does not cope plumbism it is precise. sent15: the ommatidium does not carol Yerevan and it is non-translunar if the naif is not liliaceous. sent16: if that the adenoid is translunar is correct it is a kind of a awned. sent17: that if the blinks is attractive then the blinks copes plumbism and is not a cronyism is not wrong. sent18: the quadriplegic does not carol Yerevan if the ommatidium does not carol Yerevan and is not translunar. sent19: if something does not cope plumbism it lurches patron and it is precise. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the adenoid is not a kind of a diploid and it is not a Ranger does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the adenoid is liliaceous.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the adenoid does carol Yerevan.; sent9 -> int3: something is unclear.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the adenoid does not carol Yerevan.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the adenoid is not a diploid and it is not a kind of a Ranger.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the adenoid is translunar.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the adenoid is a awned.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the mentioner is a rune.; sent19 -> int10: that the mentioner lurches patron and is precise is not false if it does not cope plumbism.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the mentioner lurches patron and it is precise.; int11 -> int12: the mentioner does lurch patron.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__