the non-changeableness is prevented by the homesteading fettle.
sent1: the circadianness happens if the allotment occurs. sent2: the homesteading tetracaine occurs if the technologicalness happens. sent3: the changeableness happens if the channelization happens. sent4: the fact that the channelization happens is not wrong if the homesteading tetracaine happens. sent5: if the homesteading fettle happens the technologicalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the homesteading fettle occurs is right.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the technologicalness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the homesteading tetracaine happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the channelization occurs.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the changeableness happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the non-changeableness is prevented by the homesteading fettle. ; $context$ = sent1: the circadianness happens if the allotment occurs. sent2: the homesteading tetracaine occurs if the technologicalness happens. sent3: the changeableness happens if the channelization happens. sent4: the fact that the channelization happens is not wrong if the homesteading tetracaine happens. sent5: if the homesteading fettle happens the technologicalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the homesteading fettle occurs is right.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the technologicalness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the homesteading tetracaine happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the channelization occurs.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the changeableness happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__