the gingersnap is retentive and it is not non-dizygotic.
sent1: that the syncopator is lexicostatistics and/or is not dizygotic does not hold. sent2: the bursa is a kind of non-gross a nimbus. sent3: the bursa is not a Cyrus but a nimbus. sent4: that the bursa is a kind of a turntable is true. sent5: there is something such that it does not gross. sent6: the syncopator is not lexicostatistics. sent7: that something is a gross that is a nimbus is not wrong. sent8: the gingersnap is sclerotic and it is a caprice. sent9: the bursa is a nimbus. sent10: the gingersnap is retentive if there exists something such that it is not a gross and it is a kind of a nimbus. sent11: the fact that if that the syncopator is lexicostatistics or it is not a kind of a Cyrus or both is incorrect then that the gingersnap is sensational hold is right. sent12: the bacteriochlorophyll does gross. sent13: the gingersnap does gross if that either the bursa is retentive or it is not dizygotic or both is not correct. sent14: there is something such that it is a nimbus. sent15: that the syncopator is lexicostatistics or is not a kind of a Cyrus or both is wrong. sent16: the syncopator is a kind of a spinal. sent17: if the fact that the syncopator is a kind of a Cyrus is not incorrect it is sensational. sent18: something is not a Juniperus but octal. sent19: there is something such that it is a kind of non-sensational thing that is a Cyrus. sent20: if something is not sensational then the fact that it is both retentive and dizygotic does not hold.
sent2 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not gross and it is a nimbus.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the gingersnap is retentive.; sent11 & sent15 -> int3: the gingersnap is sensational.;
that the gingersnap is retentive and dizygotic is wrong.
sent20 -> int4: that the gingersnap is retentive and it is dizygotic is not right if that it is not sensational is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the gingersnap is retentive and it is not non-dizygotic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the syncopator is lexicostatistics and/or is not dizygotic does not hold. sent2: the bursa is a kind of non-gross a nimbus. sent3: the bursa is not a Cyrus but a nimbus. sent4: that the bursa is a kind of a turntable is true. sent5: there is something such that it does not gross. sent6: the syncopator is not lexicostatistics. sent7: that something is a gross that is a nimbus is not wrong. sent8: the gingersnap is sclerotic and it is a caprice. sent9: the bursa is a nimbus. sent10: the gingersnap is retentive if there exists something such that it is not a gross and it is a kind of a nimbus. sent11: the fact that if that the syncopator is lexicostatistics or it is not a kind of a Cyrus or both is incorrect then that the gingersnap is sensational hold is right. sent12: the bacteriochlorophyll does gross. sent13: the gingersnap does gross if that either the bursa is retentive or it is not dizygotic or both is not correct. sent14: there is something such that it is a nimbus. sent15: that the syncopator is lexicostatistics or is not a kind of a Cyrus or both is wrong. sent16: the syncopator is a kind of a spinal. sent17: if the fact that the syncopator is a kind of a Cyrus is not incorrect it is sensational. sent18: something is not a Juniperus but octal. sent19: there is something such that it is a kind of non-sensational thing that is a Cyrus. sent20: if something is not sensational then the fact that it is both retentive and dizygotic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not gross and it is a nimbus.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the gingersnap is retentive.; sent11 & sent15 -> int3: the gingersnap is sensational.; __UNKNOWN__