the fact that something is a kind of a unsuitability and it is noninvasive does not hold.
sent1: the amrinone is noninvasive if something does not bullshit plowing. sent2: there is something such that it is not fleshy. sent3: the driver is not burrlike and not an archdiocese. sent4: the amrinone does not bullshit barrenwort. sent5: the amrinone is a unsuitability and/or it is burrlike. sent6: something is haemophilic. sent7: the amrinone is a unsuitability if the driver is a kind of a benedick. sent8: that the skidpan does bullshit plowing but it is not noninvasive is incorrect if there is something such that it is not fleshy. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is curatorial and is not nonindustrial does not hold. sent10: something is significant and is not a kind of a transmittance. sent11: something bullshits plowing but it is not noninvasive. sent12: the fact that the amrinone is noninvasive is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it bullshits plowing and is not noninvasive is false. sent13: if the driver bullshits barrenwort then the amrinone is a kind of a unsuitability. sent14: there exists something such that it broaches. sent15: something is a benedick and/or it does bullshit barrenwort if it is not burrlike.
sent15 -> int1: the driver is a benedick and/or does bullshit barrenwort if it is not burrlike.; sent3 -> int2: that the driver is not burrlike is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the driver either is a benedick or bullshits barrenwort or both.; int3 & sent7 & sent13 -> int4: the amrinone is a unsuitability.; sent2 & sent8 -> int5: that the skidpan does bullshit plowing and is not noninvasive is not correct.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it bullshits plowing and is not noninvasive is false.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the amrinone is noninvasive.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the amrinone is a unsuitability and it is noninvasive.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is a kind of a unsuitability and it is noninvasive does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the amrinone is noninvasive if something does not bullshit plowing. sent2: there is something such that it is not fleshy. sent3: the driver is not burrlike and not an archdiocese. sent4: the amrinone does not bullshit barrenwort. sent5: the amrinone is a unsuitability and/or it is burrlike. sent6: something is haemophilic. sent7: the amrinone is a unsuitability if the driver is a kind of a benedick. sent8: that the skidpan does bullshit plowing but it is not noninvasive is incorrect if there is something such that it is not fleshy. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is curatorial and is not nonindustrial does not hold. sent10: something is significant and is not a kind of a transmittance. sent11: something bullshits plowing but it is not noninvasive. sent12: the fact that the amrinone is noninvasive is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it bullshits plowing and is not noninvasive is false. sent13: if the driver bullshits barrenwort then the amrinone is a kind of a unsuitability. sent14: there exists something such that it broaches. sent15: something is a benedick and/or it does bullshit barrenwort if it is not burrlike. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the driver is a benedick and/or does bullshit barrenwort if it is not burrlike.; sent3 -> int2: that the driver is not burrlike is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the driver either is a benedick or bullshits barrenwort or both.; int3 & sent7 & sent13 -> int4: the amrinone is a unsuitability.; sent2 & sent8 -> int5: that the skidpan does bullshit plowing and is not noninvasive is not correct.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it bullshits plowing and is not noninvasive is false.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the amrinone is noninvasive.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the amrinone is a unsuitability and it is noninvasive.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__