that the amphibolite does not truss oblate and/or does not swelter alcalde is incorrect.
sent1: the amphibolite is a Stenotus and/or not a puncture. sent2: the laparoscope swelters alcalde. sent3: if there is something such that that it does not swelter alcalde and is a indomitability is not right then the fact that the fennel is not a Tyranni hold. sent4: if something is a hallmark then that it does not swelter alcalde and it is a kind of a indomitability is not true. sent5: the amphibolite does truss oblate and is a Tyranni. sent6: the amphibolite is a kind of a Tyranni or it does not truss oblate or both. sent7: the amphibolite does truss oblate and/or does not swelter alcalde. sent8: the amphibolite does not truss oblate or it does not swelter alcalde or both if the laparoscope truss oblate. sent9: if the laparoscope swelters alcalde then the amphibolite does not swelters alcalde and/or it is not unrecoverable. sent10: the laparoscope trusses oblate and it is a kind of a Tyranni. sent11: everything is a hallmark. sent12: if the laparoscope trusses oblate then that the amphibolite does not trusses oblate or it is a Tyranni or both is not wrong.
sent10 -> int1: the laparoscope does truss oblate.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fennel does not truss oblate and/or does not secede.
sent11 -> int2: that the amphibolite is a kind of a hallmark hold.; sent4 -> int3: that the amphibolite does not swelter alcalde but it is a kind of a indomitability is not right if it is a hallmark.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the amphibolite does not swelter alcalde and is a indomitability does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is nothing such that it does not swelter alcalde and is a kind of a indomitability.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the laparoscope does not swelter alcalde and is a kind of a indomitability is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not swelter alcalde and it is a indomitability is false.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the fennel is not a Tyranni.;
$hypothesis$ = that the amphibolite does not truss oblate and/or does not swelter alcalde is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the amphibolite is a Stenotus and/or not a puncture. sent2: the laparoscope swelters alcalde. sent3: if there is something such that that it does not swelter alcalde and is a indomitability is not right then the fact that the fennel is not a Tyranni hold. sent4: if something is a hallmark then that it does not swelter alcalde and it is a kind of a indomitability is not true. sent5: the amphibolite does truss oblate and is a Tyranni. sent6: the amphibolite is a kind of a Tyranni or it does not truss oblate or both. sent7: the amphibolite does truss oblate and/or does not swelter alcalde. sent8: the amphibolite does not truss oblate or it does not swelter alcalde or both if the laparoscope truss oblate. sent9: if the laparoscope swelters alcalde then the amphibolite does not swelters alcalde and/or it is not unrecoverable. sent10: the laparoscope trusses oblate and it is a kind of a Tyranni. sent11: everything is a hallmark. sent12: if the laparoscope trusses oblate then that the amphibolite does not trusses oblate or it is a Tyranni or both is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the laparoscope does truss oblate.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__