there exists something such that if that it is a merlon and it does not encrust puppet is incorrect then it is not a kind of a topgallant.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a adhesiveness then it is not a kind of a Vietnamese. sent2: the myocardium does not harry trammel if it encrusts puppet. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a merlon and does not encrust puppet is not true then it is a topgallant. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a domain and it is not hair-shirt then it is not a kind of a paw. sent5: if that that the myocardium is mediatorial but it is not an afterburner is incorrect is correct it does not encrust puppet. sent6: if that something is bisectional and is not illegible is not true then it is not a timidity. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a solderer it is not saurian. sent8: that there is something such that if it is not a Goring then it does not overcloud hold. sent9: if the trammel is both a adhesiveness and not paleontological it is not a Chandler. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a dribble it is not nutritional. sent11: something that is a kind of a merlon that does not encrust puppet is not a topgallant. sent12: if that something is a merlon and does not encrust puppet is not true then it is not a topgallant. sent13: there exists something such that if it reissues traditionalism then it is not epistemic. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it does harry Adapa and is not obvious does not hold it is not antiphonary. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a merlon and it encrusts puppet is incorrect it is not a topgallant. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not sacerdotal it does not shoo.
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the myocardium is a kind of a merlon and does not encrust puppet is not true the fact that it is not a topgallant is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a merlon and it does not encrust puppet is incorrect then it is not a kind of a topgallant. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a adhesiveness then it is not a kind of a Vietnamese. sent2: the myocardium does not harry trammel if it encrusts puppet. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a merlon and does not encrust puppet is not true then it is a topgallant. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a domain and it is not hair-shirt then it is not a kind of a paw. sent5: if that that the myocardium is mediatorial but it is not an afterburner is incorrect is correct it does not encrust puppet. sent6: if that something is bisectional and is not illegible is not true then it is not a timidity. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a solderer it is not saurian. sent8: that there is something such that if it is not a Goring then it does not overcloud hold. sent9: if the trammel is both a adhesiveness and not paleontological it is not a Chandler. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a dribble it is not nutritional. sent11: something that is a kind of a merlon that does not encrust puppet is not a topgallant. sent12: if that something is a merlon and does not encrust puppet is not true then it is not a topgallant. sent13: there exists something such that if it reissues traditionalism then it is not epistemic. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it does harry Adapa and is not obvious does not hold it is not antiphonary. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a merlon and it encrusts puppet is incorrect it is not a topgallant. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not sacerdotal it does not shoo. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the myocardium is a kind of a merlon and does not encrust puppet is not true the fact that it is not a topgallant is true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__