there exists something such that it is corrected and figurative.
sent1: something does correct. sent2: the cuckoo is not a kind of a continuant. sent3: if the cuckoo is not macrencephalic then the fact that it is both not a manse and a continuant is wrong. sent4: something that renders officiant is figurative. sent5: if something is a gavel it does expire. sent6: if the fact that the cuckoo does not correct is correct it is not a continuant. sent7: if that something does not stifle scopolamine hold then it is not a Luxemburger. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a manse but it is a kind of a continuant is not correct if it is not macrencephalic. sent9: the fact that the fact that the cuckoo is a woodborer but it is not a hyponym is not incorrect does not hold. sent10: if the cuckoo does not render redraft but it is a test then it does render officiant. sent11: if that something is not macrencephalic hold then that it is not a manse and is not a continuant is not right. sent12: that something is figurative is right. sent13: the cuckoo is not macrencephalic. sent14: the cuckoo renders officiant if it renders redraft and it does test. sent15: the cuckoo does not render redraft and is a test.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cuckoo does not correct.; sent11 -> int1: if the cuckoo is not macrencephalic that it is not a manse and is not a continuant is wrong.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the cuckoo is not a kind of a manse and it is not a kind of a continuant is not right.; sent4 -> int3: if the cuckoo does render officiant then it is figurative.; sent10 & sent15 -> int4: the cuckoo does render officiant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cuckoo is figurative.;
if the grill is a gavel then it does expire.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is corrected and figurative. ; $context$ = sent1: something does correct. sent2: the cuckoo is not a kind of a continuant. sent3: if the cuckoo is not macrencephalic then the fact that it is both not a manse and a continuant is wrong. sent4: something that renders officiant is figurative. sent5: if something is a gavel it does expire. sent6: if the fact that the cuckoo does not correct is correct it is not a continuant. sent7: if that something does not stifle scopolamine hold then it is not a Luxemburger. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a manse but it is a kind of a continuant is not correct if it is not macrencephalic. sent9: the fact that the fact that the cuckoo is a woodborer but it is not a hyponym is not incorrect does not hold. sent10: if the cuckoo does not render redraft but it is a test then it does render officiant. sent11: if that something is not macrencephalic hold then that it is not a manse and is not a continuant is not right. sent12: that something is figurative is right. sent13: the cuckoo is not macrencephalic. sent14: the cuckoo renders officiant if it renders redraft and it does test. sent15: the cuckoo does not render redraft and is a test. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cuckoo does not correct.; sent11 -> int1: if the cuckoo is not macrencephalic that it is not a manse and is not a continuant is wrong.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the cuckoo is not a kind of a manse and it is not a kind of a continuant is not right.; sent4 -> int3: if the cuckoo does render officiant then it is figurative.; sent10 & sent15 -> int4: the cuckoo does render officiant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cuckoo is figurative.; __UNKNOWN__