the flamenco does not occur.
sent1: that the pairing champagne happens triggers that the embellishment occurs. sent2: the afraidness does not occur if that the fact that both the afraidness and the microelectronicsness happens is not true is correct. sent3: if that the embellishment happens or the cleavage does not occur or both is incorrect then the pairing vitalist occurs. sent4: that the ludo occurs is true. sent5: that the imperviousness does not occur and the suppling headmistress does not occur prevents the pairing champagne. sent6: the reversedness does not occur. sent7: that the cleavage does not occur and the embellishment does not occur is caused by that the pairing vitalist does not occur. sent8: that the afraidness happens and the microelectronicsness occurs is false if the suppling metic does not occur. sent9: that both the flamenco and the suppling metic happens prevents the Protestantness. sent10: that the suppling metic does not occur triggers that the flamenco and the microelectronicsness happens. sent11: if the Protestant does not occur then that the pairing vitalist does not occur is not false. sent12: the pairing champagne occurs. sent13: if the pairing vitalist happens then that the flamenco does not occur and the Protestantness does not occur is wrong. sent14: the cleavage is prevented by that the reversed does not occur and the pairing champagne does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flamenco occurs.; sent1 & sent12 -> int1: the embellishment happens.;
the flamenco happens.
$hypothesis$ = the flamenco does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pairing champagne happens triggers that the embellishment occurs. sent2: the afraidness does not occur if that the fact that both the afraidness and the microelectronicsness happens is not true is correct. sent3: if that the embellishment happens or the cleavage does not occur or both is incorrect then the pairing vitalist occurs. sent4: that the ludo occurs is true. sent5: that the imperviousness does not occur and the suppling headmistress does not occur prevents the pairing champagne. sent6: the reversedness does not occur. sent7: that the cleavage does not occur and the embellishment does not occur is caused by that the pairing vitalist does not occur. sent8: that the afraidness happens and the microelectronicsness occurs is false if the suppling metic does not occur. sent9: that both the flamenco and the suppling metic happens prevents the Protestantness. sent10: that the suppling metic does not occur triggers that the flamenco and the microelectronicsness happens. sent11: if the Protestant does not occur then that the pairing vitalist does not occur is not false. sent12: the pairing champagne occurs. sent13: if the pairing vitalist happens then that the flamenco does not occur and the Protestantness does not occur is wrong. sent14: the cleavage is prevented by that the reversed does not occur and the pairing champagne does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flamenco occurs.; sent1 & sent12 -> int1: the embellishment happens.; __UNKNOWN__