that the croupier is not a Vela and it is not unexcitable is incorrect.
sent1: if that the weakfish does not generate is not false then the fact that it is not a SAS and it is a Vela does not hold. sent2: the fact that the croupier is not a Vela but a modern is false. sent3: the fact that if something is a foster-son the fact that it is both not a Vela and not unexcitable is incorrect hold. sent4: that the six does generate and it is a kind of a modern is incorrect if it is not a foster-son. sent5: if the six generates the weakfish is not a kind of a Vela. sent6: something is not a kind of a foster-son if it is not a Algonkian. sent7: the weakfish is not a kind of a falangist and is transatlantic if it is not a Haydn. sent8: the weakfish does not generate if the fact that it is not a Vela but unexcitable is incorrect. sent9: if something is not a kind of a foster-son then the fact that it does not generate and it is a modern does not hold. sent10: something is not nonmodern and it does generate if it is not a kind of a falangist. sent11: the fact that the six generates and it is modern does not hold. sent12: that something is not a jurist but it does pour is wrong if it is not a reluctance. sent13: there exists nothing that is both not unexcitable and a Algonkian. sent14: if the fact that something is not a SAS but it is a Algonkian is false then it is not a kind of a foster-son. sent15: if something is not a SAS then the fact that it is both not a Vela and a foster-son is false. sent16: the croupier is a kind of a foster-son if the fact that the weakfish is a modern is true. sent17: something is not a Haydn if the fact that it is on and is genitourinary does not hold. sent18: the six is not a Algonkian if the fact that it does not generate and it is a Vela is false. sent19: there exists nothing such that it is not a SAS and is a Algonkian. sent20: the croupier is both not a Vela and not unexcitable if the weakfish is not a Vela. sent21: if that the six does not generate and is a modern is false then the weakfish is not a Vela.
sent19 -> int1: that the six is not a SAS but it is a kind of a Algonkian is incorrect.; sent14 -> int2: if that the six is not a SAS and is a Algonkian is wrong then it is not a kind of a foster-son.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the six is not a foster-son.; sent9 -> int4: that the six does not generate but it is a modern is wrong if it is not a kind of a foster-son.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the six does not generate and is a modern is not true.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the weakfish is not a Vela.; int6 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the croupier is not a Vela and not unexcitable is wrong.
sent3 -> int7: the fact that the croupier is both not a Vela and not unexcitable is wrong if it is a foster-son.; sent10 -> int8: if the weakfish is not a falangist it is modern and does generate.; sent17 -> int9: if the fact that the weakfish is not non-on and it is genitourinary is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Haydn.;
$hypothesis$ = that the croupier is not a Vela and it is not unexcitable is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the weakfish does not generate is not false then the fact that it is not a SAS and it is a Vela does not hold. sent2: the fact that the croupier is not a Vela but a modern is false. sent3: the fact that if something is a foster-son the fact that it is both not a Vela and not unexcitable is incorrect hold. sent4: that the six does generate and it is a kind of a modern is incorrect if it is not a foster-son. sent5: if the six generates the weakfish is not a kind of a Vela. sent6: something is not a kind of a foster-son if it is not a Algonkian. sent7: the weakfish is not a kind of a falangist and is transatlantic if it is not a Haydn. sent8: the weakfish does not generate if the fact that it is not a Vela but unexcitable is incorrect. sent9: if something is not a kind of a foster-son then the fact that it does not generate and it is a modern does not hold. sent10: something is not nonmodern and it does generate if it is not a kind of a falangist. sent11: the fact that the six generates and it is modern does not hold. sent12: that something is not a jurist but it does pour is wrong if it is not a reluctance. sent13: there exists nothing that is both not unexcitable and a Algonkian. sent14: if the fact that something is not a SAS but it is a Algonkian is false then it is not a kind of a foster-son. sent15: if something is not a SAS then the fact that it is both not a Vela and a foster-son is false. sent16: the croupier is a kind of a foster-son if the fact that the weakfish is a modern is true. sent17: something is not a Haydn if the fact that it is on and is genitourinary does not hold. sent18: the six is not a Algonkian if the fact that it does not generate and it is a Vela is false. sent19: there exists nothing such that it is not a SAS and is a Algonkian. sent20: the croupier is both not a Vela and not unexcitable if the weakfish is not a Vela. sent21: if that the six does not generate and is a modern is false then the weakfish is not a Vela. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: that the six is not a SAS but it is a kind of a Algonkian is incorrect.; sent14 -> int2: if that the six is not a SAS and is a Algonkian is wrong then it is not a kind of a foster-son.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the six is not a foster-son.; sent9 -> int4: that the six does not generate but it is a modern is wrong if it is not a kind of a foster-son.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the six does not generate and is a modern is not true.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the weakfish is not a Vela.; int6 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__