the fact that the bialy is not sudden is true.
sent1: either the supplejack identifies Swedish or it is a detection or both if there is something such that it does not identify Sakharov. sent2: if something does not identify Sakharov the supplejack does not identify Swedish. sent3: the fact that everything is not a kind of a fuddy-duddy is right. sent4: the quartzite is a Capetian. sent5: if the supplejack is a detection the quartzite is a soliloquy. sent6: if the supplejack is not uterine then it is a Capetian. sent7: something does identify tun and is off-site if it is not a fuddy-duddy. sent8: if something is lawful and it identifies tun then the fact that it does not identify Sakharov is not wrong. sent9: everything is lawful. sent10: the supplejack is not uterine if there is something such that it is a kind of a brainwave and is a kind of a Capetian. sent11: the jagua is not a brainwave if the quartzite is uterine. sent12: if the fact that the thatcher is not off-site is right that it is not lawful and it identifies tun does not hold. sent13: something that is not a soliloquy is a kind of a Capetian and/or is uterine. sent14: something is a Capetian. sent15: the fact that something is a detection and is not sudden is not true if it does not identify Swedish. sent16: the supplejack is a soliloquy if the fact that it is not uterine is true. sent17: the jagua is not a brainwave if the quartzite is a kind of a Capetian. sent18: if something is uterine then it is not a brainwave and it is not non-Capetian. sent19: if the supplejack is a kind of a soliloquy the fact that the bialy is sudden is not incorrect. sent20: the quartzite is a brainwave. sent21: the quartzite is a kind of a soliloquy if the supplejack does identify Swedish. sent22: the fact that something is a brainwave is not false. sent23: the bialy is uterine if the quartzite is uterine. sent24: the fact that the bialy does not identify Sakharov is correct if there is something such that the fact that it is not lawful and identifies tun does not hold.
sent20 & sent4 -> int1: the quartzite is a brainwave and Capetian.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a brainwave that is a kind of a Capetian.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the supplejack is not uterine.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the supplejack is a kind of a soliloquy.; int4 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bialy is non-sudden hold.
sent8 -> int5: the thatcher does not identify Sakharov if it is lawful and it does identify tun.; sent7 -> int6: if the felloe is not a fuddy-duddy it identifies tun and is off-site.; sent3 -> int7: the felloe is not a kind of a fuddy-duddy.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the felloe does identify tun and it is off-site.; int8 -> int9: everything does identify tun and is off-site.; int9 -> int10: the thatcher does identify tun and it is off-site.; int10 -> int11: the thatcher identifies tun.; sent9 -> int12: the thatcher is lawful.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the thatcher is lawful and it identifies tun.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the thatcher does not identify Sakharov.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it does not identify Sakharov.; sent1 & int15 -> int16: the supplejack does identify Swedish and/or is a kind of a detection.; sent5 & int16 & sent21 -> int17: the quartzite is a soliloquy.; sent18 -> int18: the bialy is not a brainwave and is a Capetian if it is uterine.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bialy is not sudden is true. ; $context$ = sent1: either the supplejack identifies Swedish or it is a detection or both if there is something such that it does not identify Sakharov. sent2: if something does not identify Sakharov the supplejack does not identify Swedish. sent3: the fact that everything is not a kind of a fuddy-duddy is right. sent4: the quartzite is a Capetian. sent5: if the supplejack is a detection the quartzite is a soliloquy. sent6: if the supplejack is not uterine then it is a Capetian. sent7: something does identify tun and is off-site if it is not a fuddy-duddy. sent8: if something is lawful and it identifies tun then the fact that it does not identify Sakharov is not wrong. sent9: everything is lawful. sent10: the supplejack is not uterine if there is something such that it is a kind of a brainwave and is a kind of a Capetian. sent11: the jagua is not a brainwave if the quartzite is uterine. sent12: if the fact that the thatcher is not off-site is right that it is not lawful and it identifies tun does not hold. sent13: something that is not a soliloquy is a kind of a Capetian and/or is uterine. sent14: something is a Capetian. sent15: the fact that something is a detection and is not sudden is not true if it does not identify Swedish. sent16: the supplejack is a soliloquy if the fact that it is not uterine is true. sent17: the jagua is not a brainwave if the quartzite is a kind of a Capetian. sent18: if something is uterine then it is not a brainwave and it is not non-Capetian. sent19: if the supplejack is a kind of a soliloquy the fact that the bialy is sudden is not incorrect. sent20: the quartzite is a brainwave. sent21: the quartzite is a kind of a soliloquy if the supplejack does identify Swedish. sent22: the fact that something is a brainwave is not false. sent23: the bialy is uterine if the quartzite is uterine. sent24: the fact that the bialy does not identify Sakharov is correct if there is something such that the fact that it is not lawful and identifies tun does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent4 -> int1: the quartzite is a brainwave and Capetian.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a brainwave that is a kind of a Capetian.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the supplejack is not uterine.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the supplejack is a kind of a soliloquy.; int4 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__