the organdy kidnaps successor.
sent1: something impersonates if that it does not impersonates and it does not kidnap successor is not correct. sent2: the jetsam does not disentangle if there exists something such that that it disentangle and it is a wandflower is not true. sent3: if the fact that the organdy does not impersonate and it does not prevail does not hold then it kidnaps successor. sent4: if something is not scriptural then it is not weatherly. sent5: the fact that the organdy does not impersonate and prevails is wrong. sent6: the organdy does kidnap successor if it does prevail. sent7: the organdy is not carvel-built. sent8: if something is non-carposporic it is not a fidget. sent9: the fact that the Ishmael disentangles and is a wandflower is not true. sent10: the organdy is a closeout. sent11: if something does not disentangle then the fact that it does not impersonate and does not kidnap successor is not correct. sent12: the cockroach is not a kind of a Defense. sent13: if the buttress is a Defense then the Ishmael is a Defense. sent14: that the organdy does not impersonate and it does not prevail is incorrect if it is not a Defense. sent15: that the organdy is cross-cultural is true. sent16: the organdy impersonates and is not carvel-built if the Ishmael is a Defense. sent17: if something is not carvel-built then it is not a Defense. sent18: if the organdy does not prevail it does not skank. sent19: if something does impersonate and it is carvel-built it is not a Defense. sent20: the buttress is a Defense and it prevails if it does not disentangle. sent21: if the organdy is not a Defense then that it does not impersonate and does prevail is not correct.
sent17 -> int1: if the organdy is not carvel-built then it is not a kind of a Defense.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the organdy is not a Defense.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: that the organdy does not impersonate and does not prevail is not correct.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the jetsam is not a kind of a Defense.
sent19 -> int4: if the jetsam impersonates and is carvel-built then it is not a kind of a Defense.; sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the jetsam does not impersonate and it does not kidnap successor is not correct then it impersonate.; sent11 -> int6: the fact that the jetsam does not impersonate and does not kidnap successor does not hold if it does not disentangle.; sent9 -> int7: there exists something such that that it disentangles and it is a wandflower is not right.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the jetsam does not disentangle.; int6 & int8 -> int9: that the jetsam does not impersonate and it does not kidnap successor is not true.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the jetsam does impersonate.;
$hypothesis$ = the organdy kidnaps successor. ; $context$ = sent1: something impersonates if that it does not impersonates and it does not kidnap successor is not correct. sent2: the jetsam does not disentangle if there exists something such that that it disentangle and it is a wandflower is not true. sent3: if the fact that the organdy does not impersonate and it does not prevail does not hold then it kidnaps successor. sent4: if something is not scriptural then it is not weatherly. sent5: the fact that the organdy does not impersonate and prevails is wrong. sent6: the organdy does kidnap successor if it does prevail. sent7: the organdy is not carvel-built. sent8: if something is non-carposporic it is not a fidget. sent9: the fact that the Ishmael disentangles and is a wandflower is not true. sent10: the organdy is a closeout. sent11: if something does not disentangle then the fact that it does not impersonate and does not kidnap successor is not correct. sent12: the cockroach is not a kind of a Defense. sent13: if the buttress is a Defense then the Ishmael is a Defense. sent14: that the organdy does not impersonate and it does not prevail is incorrect if it is not a Defense. sent15: that the organdy is cross-cultural is true. sent16: the organdy impersonates and is not carvel-built if the Ishmael is a Defense. sent17: if something is not carvel-built then it is not a Defense. sent18: if the organdy does not prevail it does not skank. sent19: if something does impersonate and it is carvel-built it is not a Defense. sent20: the buttress is a Defense and it prevails if it does not disentangle. sent21: if the organdy is not a Defense then that it does not impersonate and does prevail is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: if the organdy is not carvel-built then it is not a kind of a Defense.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the organdy is not a Defense.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: that the organdy does not impersonate and does not prevail is not correct.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__