the papilla is a kind of a scrambled.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a journalism. sent2: if there is something such that it does not embark then the freewheeler is not a Trollius and does not surmise regeneration. sent3: something is not a scrambled if it solemnizes hippoboscid. sent4: the papilla does not solemnize effervescence if the moraine is not a kind of a scrambled and it is not Somalian. sent5: if the bedstead does not embark then the fact that the moraine is a Trollius and it is a kind of a Somalian is incorrect. sent6: if there are non-Stravinskyan things the fact that the effervescence is not a Kama and it does not solemnize hippoboscid is not wrong. sent7: if that the freewheeler does embark but it does not surmise regeneration does not hold then the bedstead is a Trollius. sent8: if the effervescence is not Stravinskyan then that the freewheeler does embark and does surmise regeneration is not correct. sent9: that the papilla is Stravinskyan is correct if the fact that the effervescence is a kind of a Somalian and does not solemnize hippoboscid is incorrect. sent10: the papilla solemnizes hippoboscid if that the Ashkenazi is a Trollius but it is not a Kama is wrong. sent11: the effervescence is not Stravinskyan if the moraine is not a kind of a Somalian and does not solemnize effervescence. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a journalism then the moraine is non-Somalian thing that does not solemnize effervescence. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Somalian the moraine is both not a Kama and not a Trollius. sent14: something is both a journalism and a scrambled if the fact that it is not Somalian is true. sent15: that the freewheeler embarks but it does not surmise regeneration is wrong if the effervescence is not Stravinskyan. sent16: the fact that the Ashkenazi is both a Trollius and not a Kama does not hold if the fact that the bedstead is a Trollius is not incorrect.
sent1 & sent12 -> int1: the moraine is not Somalian and does not solemnize effervescence.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the effervescence is not Stravinskyan.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the freewheeler does embark and does not surmise regeneration is false.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the bedstead is a Trollius.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the Ashkenazi is a kind of a Trollius but it is not a Kama is not right.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the papilla solemnizes hippoboscid.; sent3 -> int7: the papilla is not a scrambled if the fact that it does solemnize hippoboscid hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the papilla scrambles.
sent14 -> int8: the papilla is a journalism and it is a scrambled if it is non-Somalian.;
$hypothesis$ = the papilla is a kind of a scrambled. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a journalism. sent2: if there is something such that it does not embark then the freewheeler is not a Trollius and does not surmise regeneration. sent3: something is not a scrambled if it solemnizes hippoboscid. sent4: the papilla does not solemnize effervescence if the moraine is not a kind of a scrambled and it is not Somalian. sent5: if the bedstead does not embark then the fact that the moraine is a Trollius and it is a kind of a Somalian is incorrect. sent6: if there are non-Stravinskyan things the fact that the effervescence is not a Kama and it does not solemnize hippoboscid is not wrong. sent7: if that the freewheeler does embark but it does not surmise regeneration does not hold then the bedstead is a Trollius. sent8: if the effervescence is not Stravinskyan then that the freewheeler does embark and does surmise regeneration is not correct. sent9: that the papilla is Stravinskyan is correct if the fact that the effervescence is a kind of a Somalian and does not solemnize hippoboscid is incorrect. sent10: the papilla solemnizes hippoboscid if that the Ashkenazi is a Trollius but it is not a Kama is wrong. sent11: the effervescence is not Stravinskyan if the moraine is not a kind of a Somalian and does not solemnize effervescence. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a journalism then the moraine is non-Somalian thing that does not solemnize effervescence. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Somalian the moraine is both not a Kama and not a Trollius. sent14: something is both a journalism and a scrambled if the fact that it is not Somalian is true. sent15: that the freewheeler embarks but it does not surmise regeneration is wrong if the effervescence is not Stravinskyan. sent16: the fact that the Ashkenazi is both a Trollius and not a Kama does not hold if the fact that the bedstead is a Trollius is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent12 -> int1: the moraine is not Somalian and does not solemnize effervescence.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the effervescence is not Stravinskyan.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the freewheeler does embark and does not surmise regeneration is false.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the bedstead is a Trollius.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the Ashkenazi is a kind of a Trollius but it is not a Kama is not right.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the papilla solemnizes hippoboscid.; sent3 -> int7: the papilla is not a scrambled if the fact that it does solemnize hippoboscid hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__