the fact that the hit does not occur and the resilience does not occur is not correct.
sent1: the Melanesianness occurs and the error does not occur. sent2: the Melanesianness does not occur if that the hit does not occur and the resilience does not occur does not hold. sent3: the stomatousness does not occur. sent4: the sealing does not occur. sent5: if that both the Melanesianness and the error occurs is wrong then the litigation does not occur. sent6: that the offertory does not occur and the heterologousness does not occur is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the hitting does not occur and the resilience does not occur hold is not right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the Melanesianness does not occur is not wrong.; sent1 -> int2: the Melanesianness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the litigation does not occur and the inconsiderableness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hit does not occur and the resilience does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Melanesianness occurs and the error does not occur. sent2: the Melanesianness does not occur if that the hit does not occur and the resilience does not occur does not hold. sent3: the stomatousness does not occur. sent4: the sealing does not occur. sent5: if that both the Melanesianness and the error occurs is wrong then the litigation does not occur. sent6: that the offertory does not occur and the heterologousness does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the hitting does not occur and the resilience does not occur hold is not right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the Melanesianness does not occur is not wrong.; sent1 -> int2: the Melanesianness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__