that the citron is a zodiac and it is disjunct is wrong.
sent1: if something is not a zodiac then it is proteinaceous. sent2: the fact that the citron is a zodiac and it is disjunct is false if that the sunrise is not a zodiac hold. sent3: something is proteinaceous if it is not disjunct. sent4: the vasopressin does not surmise Bubalus and is not proteinaceous. sent5: the names is not a zodiac if the sunrise does surmise Bubalus and is not proteinaceous. sent6: if the sunrise is a zodiac then that the vasopressin is not vesicular but a flab is wrong. sent7: if the fact that something is non-vesicular but it is a flab does not hold then it does surmise Bubalus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunrise is a zodiac.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the vasopressin is not vesicular but it is a flab is not right.; sent7 -> int2: if the fact that the vasopressin is not vesicular but it is a flab is not true then it surmises Bubalus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the vasopressin surmises Bubalus hold.; sent4 -> int4: the vasopressin does not surmise Bubalus.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sunrise is not a zodiac.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the names is not a zodiac.
$hypothesis$ = that the citron is a zodiac and it is disjunct is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a zodiac then it is proteinaceous. sent2: the fact that the citron is a zodiac and it is disjunct is false if that the sunrise is not a zodiac hold. sent3: something is proteinaceous if it is not disjunct. sent4: the vasopressin does not surmise Bubalus and is not proteinaceous. sent5: the names is not a zodiac if the sunrise does surmise Bubalus and is not proteinaceous. sent6: if the sunrise is a zodiac then that the vasopressin is not vesicular but a flab is wrong. sent7: if the fact that something is non-vesicular but it is a flab does not hold then it does surmise Bubalus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sunrise is a zodiac.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the vasopressin is not vesicular but it is a flab is not right.; sent7 -> int2: if the fact that the vasopressin is not vesicular but it is a flab is not true then it surmises Bubalus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the vasopressin surmises Bubalus hold.; sent4 -> int4: the vasopressin does not surmise Bubalus.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the sunrise is not a zodiac.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__