that if the locking occurs the meeting happens but the unselfishness does not occur is not correct.
sent1: if the malingering burrito does not occur the Albanian occurs. sent2: that both the softness and the non-unselfishness occurs is not true if the underlying happens. sent3: if the meeting does not occur then the underlying occurs and the locking occurs. sent4: the Albanian happens. sent5: the ohmage does not occur and the softness does not occur. sent6: if the underlying does not occur the locking does not occur. sent7: if the piping does not occur then the meeting happens and the .45-caliberness happens. sent8: the ohmage prevents that the growth does not occur. sent9: if the malingering burrito does not occur the piping does not occur but the Albanianness occurs. sent10: the malingering burrito does not occur. sent11: that the softness does not occur and the unselfishness occurs causes that the underlying does not occur. sent12: if the underlying does not occur the lock occurs. sent13: the turtling and the abbatialness occurs.
sent5 -> int1: the softness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unselfishness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the softness does not occur and the unselfishness occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the underlying does not occur hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the lock does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lock occurs.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the unselfishness does not occur.; sent9 & sent10 -> int7: not the piping but the Albanianness happens.; int7 -> int8: the piping does not occur.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the meeting and the .45-caliberness happens.; int9 -> int10: the meeting occurs.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the meeting and the selfishness occurs.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the growth occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that if the locking occurs the meeting happens but the unselfishness does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the malingering burrito does not occur the Albanian occurs. sent2: that both the softness and the non-unselfishness occurs is not true if the underlying happens. sent3: if the meeting does not occur then the underlying occurs and the locking occurs. sent4: the Albanian happens. sent5: the ohmage does not occur and the softness does not occur. sent6: if the underlying does not occur the locking does not occur. sent7: if the piping does not occur then the meeting happens and the .45-caliberness happens. sent8: the ohmage prevents that the growth does not occur. sent9: if the malingering burrito does not occur the piping does not occur but the Albanianness occurs. sent10: the malingering burrito does not occur. sent11: that the softness does not occur and the unselfishness occurs causes that the underlying does not occur. sent12: if the underlying does not occur the lock occurs. sent13: the turtling and the abbatialness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the softness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unselfishness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the softness does not occur and the unselfishness occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the underlying does not occur hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the lock does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lock occurs.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the unselfishness does not occur.; sent9 & sent10 -> int7: not the piping but the Albanianness happens.; int7 -> int8: the piping does not occur.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the meeting and the .45-caliberness happens.; int9 -> int10: the meeting occurs.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the meeting and the selfishness occurs.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__