the airship does not outnumber levator.
sent1: something is a kind of a Stenotus and/or is suborbital. sent2: if the woodhewer is not a Stenotus the fact that either the ewe is a kind of a Stenotus or it is suborbital or both is not true. sent3: the levator outnumbers pannikin if that the plastique is not a kind of a Qatar and it does not mooch pasty is wrong. sent4: the fact that the ewe is not a kelvin and not suborbital is wrong. sent5: if that the deanery does reorient Phanerozoic but it is not a kelvin is not right the woodhewer is not a kind of a Stenotus. sent6: the VIP is not jihadi. sent7: if the levator outnumbers pannikin the fact that the fact that the deanery reorients Phanerozoic but it is not a kelvin is not wrong is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that either it is Romans or it is stiff or both is false. sent9: the deanery does not mooch pasty. sent10: that the levator is a Stenotus but it does not outnumber pannikin is not right. sent11: the fact that the plastique is not a Qatar and does not mooch pasty is incorrect. sent12: if something does not outnumber pannikin then that it is a kelvin and does not reorient Phanerozoic is wrong. sent13: something that is jihadi does outnumber levator. sent14: the airship is jihadi if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Stenotus and/or it is suborbital is not correct. sent15: something does not reorient Phanerozoic. sent16: the fact that the levator is a Stenotus that does not outnumber levator is not true if the ewe does outnumber pannikin. sent17: there is something such that that it is suborbital and/or it does reorient Phanerozoic is false. sent18: the fact that the fact that something is inexplicable and/or it is chronological is right is false if it is not a kind of a kelvin. sent19: the deanery adapts Ustilago. sent20: the fact that the airship either does reorient Phanerozoic or is jihadi or both is wrong if that the deanery does not reorient Phanerozoic is not incorrect. sent21: the plastique is a kind of a Stenotus.
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the levator does outnumber pannikin.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that that the deanery reorients Phanerozoic but it is not a kelvin is not false does not hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the woodhewer is not a kind of a Stenotus.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that either the ewe is a Stenotus or it is suborbital or both is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Stenotus and/or it is suborbital is incorrect.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the airship is jihadi.; sent13 -> int7: if the airship is jihadi the fact that it outnumbers levator is not wrong.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that either it is inexplicable or it is chronological or both is not correct.
sent18 -> int8: if the plastique is not a kelvin then the fact that it is inexplicable or it is chronological or both is not correct.; sent12 -> int9: if the plastique does not outnumber pannikin then that it is a kelvin and it does not reorient Phanerozoic is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the airship does not outnumber levator. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a Stenotus and/or is suborbital. sent2: if the woodhewer is not a Stenotus the fact that either the ewe is a kind of a Stenotus or it is suborbital or both is not true. sent3: the levator outnumbers pannikin if that the plastique is not a kind of a Qatar and it does not mooch pasty is wrong. sent4: the fact that the ewe is not a kelvin and not suborbital is wrong. sent5: if that the deanery does reorient Phanerozoic but it is not a kelvin is not right the woodhewer is not a kind of a Stenotus. sent6: the VIP is not jihadi. sent7: if the levator outnumbers pannikin the fact that the fact that the deanery reorients Phanerozoic but it is not a kelvin is not wrong is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that either it is Romans or it is stiff or both is false. sent9: the deanery does not mooch pasty. sent10: that the levator is a Stenotus but it does not outnumber pannikin is not right. sent11: the fact that the plastique is not a Qatar and does not mooch pasty is incorrect. sent12: if something does not outnumber pannikin then that it is a kelvin and does not reorient Phanerozoic is wrong. sent13: something that is jihadi does outnumber levator. sent14: the airship is jihadi if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Stenotus and/or it is suborbital is not correct. sent15: something does not reorient Phanerozoic. sent16: the fact that the levator is a Stenotus that does not outnumber levator is not true if the ewe does outnumber pannikin. sent17: there is something such that that it is suborbital and/or it does reorient Phanerozoic is false. sent18: the fact that the fact that something is inexplicable and/or it is chronological is right is false if it is not a kind of a kelvin. sent19: the deanery adapts Ustilago. sent20: the fact that the airship either does reorient Phanerozoic or is jihadi or both is wrong if that the deanery does not reorient Phanerozoic is not incorrect. sent21: the plastique is a kind of a Stenotus. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the levator does outnumber pannikin.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that that the deanery reorients Phanerozoic but it is not a kelvin is not false does not hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the woodhewer is not a kind of a Stenotus.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that either the ewe is a Stenotus or it is suborbital or both is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Stenotus and/or it is suborbital is incorrect.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the airship is jihadi.; sent13 -> int7: if the airship is jihadi the fact that it outnumbers levator is not wrong.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__