the fact that the mudcat is nectariferous hold.
sent1: the fact that the estrogen coalesces and is nectariferous does not hold if there exists something such that that it is a Geum is right. sent2: if the marquetry does board wailer the fixer-upper is not non-nectariferous but it is not irreplaceable. sent3: the empiricist is nectariferous thing that does gall emeritus. sent4: if that the estrogen does coalesce and is nectariferous is wrong then that the methicillin does not coalesce is correct. sent5: if the fixer-upper is both nectariferous and not irreplaceable the mudcat is not nectariferous. sent6: the marquetry is a cheeseburger if that the empiricist is a cheeseburger but it does not coalesce is not correct. sent7: if something does not jet astrolabe the fact that the empiricist jets housekeeper or it is a sketch or both is wrong. sent8: if that the fact that something jets housekeeper or it sketches or both is not wrong is incorrect it is not a kind of a Geum. sent9: if the mudcat is not irreplaceable and it is not a kind of a cheeseburger then the empiricist is irreplaceable. sent10: the marquetry is a cheeseburger and it coalesces if the fixer-upper is not a cheeseburger. sent11: if the Uruguayan jets housekeeper that the astrolabe is a Geum hold. sent12: the rinse is a kind of a Chesterfield if the fact that it is a lobster is not false. sent13: if the methicillin is not a Geum the fact that the empiricist is a cheeseburger but it does not coalesce is false. sent14: the marquetry is a sketch if the fixer-upper is not a sketch but it boards wailer. sent15: the fixer-upper is irreplaceable. sent16: the fact that the Uruguayan is a gradual and/or it is a kind of a deductible does not hold. sent17: something is not a kind of a cheeseburger if it is irreplaceable and it boards wailer. sent18: the harbor is not amblyopic if there exists something such that the fact that it is gradual and is not a deductible is wrong. sent19: the rinse is a lobster. sent20: that if the methicillin does not coalesce then the mudcat is not irreplaceable and it is not a cheeseburger hold. sent21: there is something such that it does not jet astrolabe. sent22: if the fixer-upper does not board wailer then the fact that the mudcat is nectariferous is not incorrect. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not amblyopic the Uruguayan jets astrolabe and it jets housekeeper. sent24: that the rinse is both a gradual and not deductible is not right if it is a kind of a Chesterfield. sent25: the fact that the astrolabe is not amblyopic is right if there exists something such that the fact that it is a gradual and/or it is a kind of a deductible does not hold. sent26: that the empiricist is a Geum if the marquetry does coalesce is correct. sent27: the methicillin is not a Geum and does not jet housekeeper if the estrogen is not a sketch.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fixer-upper does board wailer.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fixer-upper is irreplaceable and it boards wailer.; sent17 -> int2: if the fixer-upper is irreplaceable and it boards wailer then it is not a cheeseburger.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fixer-upper is not a kind of a cheeseburger.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the marquetry is a cheeseburger and it coalesces.; int4 -> int5: the marquetry does coalesce.; int5 & sent26 -> int6: the fact that the empiricist is a Geum is not wrong.; sent8 -> int7: that if the fact that the empiricist jets housekeeper or it does sketch or both is not true then the empiricist is not a Geum is true.; sent21 & sent7 -> int8: that the empiricist either does jet housekeeper or is a sketch or both does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the empiricist is not a Geum.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the fixer-upper does not board wailer.; int11 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the mudcat is not nectariferous.
sent16 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is a gradual and/or is a deductible is not true.; int12 & sent25 -> int13: the astrolabe is not amblyopic.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not amblyopic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mudcat is nectariferous hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the estrogen coalesces and is nectariferous does not hold if there exists something such that that it is a Geum is right. sent2: if the marquetry does board wailer the fixer-upper is not non-nectariferous but it is not irreplaceable. sent3: the empiricist is nectariferous thing that does gall emeritus. sent4: if that the estrogen does coalesce and is nectariferous is wrong then that the methicillin does not coalesce is correct. sent5: if the fixer-upper is both nectariferous and not irreplaceable the mudcat is not nectariferous. sent6: the marquetry is a cheeseburger if that the empiricist is a cheeseburger but it does not coalesce is not correct. sent7: if something does not jet astrolabe the fact that the empiricist jets housekeeper or it is a sketch or both is wrong. sent8: if that the fact that something jets housekeeper or it sketches or both is not wrong is incorrect it is not a kind of a Geum. sent9: if the mudcat is not irreplaceable and it is not a kind of a cheeseburger then the empiricist is irreplaceable. sent10: the marquetry is a cheeseburger and it coalesces if the fixer-upper is not a cheeseburger. sent11: if the Uruguayan jets housekeeper that the astrolabe is a Geum hold. sent12: the rinse is a kind of a Chesterfield if the fact that it is a lobster is not false. sent13: if the methicillin is not a Geum the fact that the empiricist is a cheeseburger but it does not coalesce is false. sent14: the marquetry is a sketch if the fixer-upper is not a sketch but it boards wailer. sent15: the fixer-upper is irreplaceable. sent16: the fact that the Uruguayan is a gradual and/or it is a kind of a deductible does not hold. sent17: something is not a kind of a cheeseburger if it is irreplaceable and it boards wailer. sent18: the harbor is not amblyopic if there exists something such that the fact that it is gradual and is not a deductible is wrong. sent19: the rinse is a lobster. sent20: that if the methicillin does not coalesce then the mudcat is not irreplaceable and it is not a cheeseburger hold. sent21: there is something such that it does not jet astrolabe. sent22: if the fixer-upper does not board wailer then the fact that the mudcat is nectariferous is not incorrect. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not amblyopic the Uruguayan jets astrolabe and it jets housekeeper. sent24: that the rinse is both a gradual and not deductible is not right if it is a kind of a Chesterfield. sent25: the fact that the astrolabe is not amblyopic is right if there exists something such that the fact that it is a gradual and/or it is a kind of a deductible does not hold. sent26: that the empiricist is a Geum if the marquetry does coalesce is correct. sent27: the methicillin is not a Geum and does not jet housekeeper if the estrogen is not a sketch. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fixer-upper does board wailer.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fixer-upper is irreplaceable and it boards wailer.; sent17 -> int2: if the fixer-upper is irreplaceable and it boards wailer then it is not a cheeseburger.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fixer-upper is not a kind of a cheeseburger.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the marquetry is a cheeseburger and it coalesces.; int4 -> int5: the marquetry does coalesce.; int5 & sent26 -> int6: the fact that the empiricist is a Geum is not wrong.; sent8 -> int7: that if the fact that the empiricist jets housekeeper or it does sketch or both is not true then the empiricist is not a Geum is true.; sent21 & sent7 -> int8: that the empiricist either does jet housekeeper or is a sketch or both does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the empiricist is not a Geum.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the fixer-upper does not board wailer.; int11 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__