that the pond is a kind of non-follicular thing that is a bottle is wrong.
sent1: the tetrachloromethane is a kind of a reciprocal but it is not follicular. sent2: that the fact that the pond does not scant but it is a ruble is not right is not false if it does bottle. sent3: that the bimbo is not noncrucial and does parch cymbid is incorrect. sent4: the pond parches cymbid. sent5: The cymbid parches pond. sent6: if that the alarmist parches cymbid and it is inguinal is incorrect then the pond is not follicular. sent7: that the pond is follicular and it is a bottle is not correct. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is not a storax and/or it nettles woofer is false. sent9: the lenitive bottles. sent10: the pond is keyless. sent11: the fact that the pond does not disobey multiplicand and is a bottle is false. sent12: the fact that the pond is not a goatfish but it is inguinal is not true if it nettles Gesell. sent13: if the pond is inguinal then that it is follicular and it does bottle is not right. sent14: that the islander is not a kind of a motif but it does disobey multiplicand is not right if that it parches cymbid is right. sent15: if the pond does parch cymbid then it is inguinal. sent16: that something does parch cymbid and is inguinal is false if it is not macerative.
sent15 & sent4 -> int1: the pond is inguinal.;
the pond is not follicular and does bottle.
sent16 -> int2: if the alarmist is not macerative the fact that it parches cymbid and is inguinal is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pond is a kind of non-follicular thing that is a bottle is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the tetrachloromethane is a kind of a reciprocal but it is not follicular. sent2: that the fact that the pond does not scant but it is a ruble is not right is not false if it does bottle. sent3: that the bimbo is not noncrucial and does parch cymbid is incorrect. sent4: the pond parches cymbid. sent5: The cymbid parches pond. sent6: if that the alarmist parches cymbid and it is inguinal is incorrect then the pond is not follicular. sent7: that the pond is follicular and it is a bottle is not correct. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is not a storax and/or it nettles woofer is false. sent9: the lenitive bottles. sent10: the pond is keyless. sent11: the fact that the pond does not disobey multiplicand and is a bottle is false. sent12: the fact that the pond is not a goatfish but it is inguinal is not true if it nettles Gesell. sent13: if the pond is inguinal then that it is follicular and it does bottle is not right. sent14: that the islander is not a kind of a motif but it does disobey multiplicand is not right if that it parches cymbid is right. sent15: if the pond does parch cymbid then it is inguinal. sent16: that something does parch cymbid and is inguinal is false if it is not macerative. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent4 -> int1: the pond is inguinal.; __UNKNOWN__