that the gipsywort exceeds Hall and is not a kind of a percentile does not hold.
sent1: that the gipsywort is not fetal is not wrong. sent2: that the gipsywort exceeds Hall but it is not a percentile is not true if the macebearer does not preempt interreflection. sent3: the gipsywort does charge. sent4: the metalware is not fetal. sent5: if something is not a transliteration it is not a isometrics. sent6: the fact that the macebearer is not a isometrics and it is not a transliteration is not right if something is pyemic. sent7: if the kalumpang is a transliteration the biprism is centralist. sent8: if the macebearer is pyemic then the kalumpang is a kind of a transliteration. sent9: the gipsywort does exceed Hall if the macebearer is not non-pyemic but it does not exceed Hall. sent10: the macebearer is not unafraid if the kalumpang is pyemic thing that is unafraid. sent11: the fact that the fact that the gipsywort exceeds Hall and is a percentile is not correct hold. sent12: if there is something such that it preempts interreflection then the kalumpang either is fetal or is not centralist or both. sent13: if that the metalware is not a sacrifice but it jellifies gunfight is false then the biprism is a kind of a percentile. sent14: if the macebearer is a isometrics then that it is pyemic hold. sent15: the custom-made does not consume. sent16: something preempts interreflection but it does not exceed Hall if it is a percentile. sent17: the fact that if the biprism is centralist then the metalware is fetal is correct. sent18: if there is something such that that it is not mucinous and it does not repossess does not hold the gipsywort repossess. sent19: the citrine is a kind of a transliteration if there exists something such that that it is not a isometrics and it is not a transliteration is not correct. sent20: if the gipsywort repossesses then it is fingerless. sent21: the fact that the metalware is not a sacrifice but it does jellify gunfight is wrong if there exists something such that it is fingerless. sent22: if the custom-made does not consume the fact that it is not mucinous and it does not repossess is not correct. sent23: if the macebearer does not preempt interreflection then the fact that the gipsywort exceeds Hall and it is a percentile does not hold. sent24: if something is fetal and/or is not centralist it is pyemic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the macebearer is not non-isometrics.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the macebearer is pyemic.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the kalumpang is a transliteration.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the biprism is centralist.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the metalware is fetal.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the macebearer is not a isometrics.;
the gipsywort does exceed Hall but it is not a kind of a percentile.
$hypothesis$ = that the gipsywort exceeds Hall and is not a kind of a percentile does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the gipsywort is not fetal is not wrong. sent2: that the gipsywort exceeds Hall but it is not a percentile is not true if the macebearer does not preempt interreflection. sent3: the gipsywort does charge. sent4: the metalware is not fetal. sent5: if something is not a transliteration it is not a isometrics. sent6: the fact that the macebearer is not a isometrics and it is not a transliteration is not right if something is pyemic. sent7: if the kalumpang is a transliteration the biprism is centralist. sent8: if the macebearer is pyemic then the kalumpang is a kind of a transliteration. sent9: the gipsywort does exceed Hall if the macebearer is not non-pyemic but it does not exceed Hall. sent10: the macebearer is not unafraid if the kalumpang is pyemic thing that is unafraid. sent11: the fact that the fact that the gipsywort exceeds Hall and is a percentile is not correct hold. sent12: if there is something such that it preempts interreflection then the kalumpang either is fetal or is not centralist or both. sent13: if that the metalware is not a sacrifice but it jellifies gunfight is false then the biprism is a kind of a percentile. sent14: if the macebearer is a isometrics then that it is pyemic hold. sent15: the custom-made does not consume. sent16: something preempts interreflection but it does not exceed Hall if it is a percentile. sent17: the fact that if the biprism is centralist then the metalware is fetal is correct. sent18: if there is something such that that it is not mucinous and it does not repossess does not hold the gipsywort repossess. sent19: the citrine is a kind of a transliteration if there exists something such that that it is not a isometrics and it is not a transliteration is not correct. sent20: if the gipsywort repossesses then it is fingerless. sent21: the fact that the metalware is not a sacrifice but it does jellify gunfight is wrong if there exists something such that it is fingerless. sent22: if the custom-made does not consume the fact that it is not mucinous and it does not repossess is not correct. sent23: if the macebearer does not preempt interreflection then the fact that the gipsywort exceeds Hall and it is a percentile does not hold. sent24: if something is fetal and/or is not centralist it is pyemic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the macebearer is not non-isometrics.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the macebearer is pyemic.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the kalumpang is a transliteration.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the biprism is centralist.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the metalware is fetal.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the macebearer is not a isometrics.; __UNKNOWN__