that there exists something such that if it amounts then that it is both not a spittlebug and not a subunit is not right does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it fudges skeg that it is not a label and it spots Clitocybe does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a petroglyph then the fact that it rejuvenates and it is not a osteotomy does not hold. sent3: that that the propenoate is a split but it does not steady is incorrect hold if it is a spittlebug. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Campephilus is not wrong then that it does not sightsee and is not horse-drawn is false. sent5: if something adapts that it is not fossil and it is not noxious is false. sent6: if the tanager is an amount then that it is not a kind of a spittlebug and is a kind of a subunit is false. sent7: there is something such that if it is a ineligibility then the fact that it is a kind of diffusing thing that is not a static is not correct. sent8: that the fact that something is not toxicological and not a subunit is correct is wrong if it is a dosser. sent9: there is something such that if it does beat flower that it is non-blind but not intolerant is wrong. sent10: the fact that the tanager is a kind of a spittlebug but it is not a subunit does not hold if it does amount. sent11: if the tanager does amount it is both not a spittlebug and not a subunit. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Homogyne the fact that it does not buy and it is not toxicological is not true. sent13: if the tanager does fudge jag then that it protuberates and it is not a kind of a ineligibility is not true. sent14: if something is a hilus the fact that it does not spot Clitocybe and is not a spittlebug is false. sent15: if the tanager amounts the fact that it is not a spittlebug and not a subunit is not right. sent16: there is something such that if it does amount then it is not a spittlebug and it is not a subunit. sent17: there exists something such that if it is an elevation the fact that it does not spot cramped and it is not a kind of a European is not right.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
that there exists something such that if it adapts then that it is both not fossil and non-noxious is wrong is not false.
sent5 -> int1: if the skeg does adapt that it is both not a fossil and not noxious is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it amounts then that it is both not a spittlebug and not a subunit is not right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it fudges skeg that it is not a label and it spots Clitocybe does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a petroglyph then the fact that it rejuvenates and it is not a osteotomy does not hold. sent3: that that the propenoate is a split but it does not steady is incorrect hold if it is a spittlebug. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Campephilus is not wrong then that it does not sightsee and is not horse-drawn is false. sent5: if something adapts that it is not fossil and it is not noxious is false. sent6: if the tanager is an amount then that it is not a kind of a spittlebug and is a kind of a subunit is false. sent7: there is something such that if it is a ineligibility then the fact that it is a kind of diffusing thing that is not a static is not correct. sent8: that the fact that something is not toxicological and not a subunit is correct is wrong if it is a dosser. sent9: there is something such that if it does beat flower that it is non-blind but not intolerant is wrong. sent10: the fact that the tanager is a kind of a spittlebug but it is not a subunit does not hold if it does amount. sent11: if the tanager does amount it is both not a spittlebug and not a subunit. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Homogyne the fact that it does not buy and it is not toxicological is not true. sent13: if the tanager does fudge jag then that it protuberates and it is not a kind of a ineligibility is not true. sent14: if something is a hilus the fact that it does not spot Clitocybe and is not a spittlebug is false. sent15: if the tanager amounts the fact that it is not a spittlebug and not a subunit is not right. sent16: there is something such that if it does amount then it is not a spittlebug and it is not a subunit. sent17: there exists something such that if it is an elevation the fact that it does not spot cramped and it is not a kind of a European is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__