the fact that the veal is not a soapwort but it is a dither is incorrect.
sent1: the zygote is not a jabberwocky. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a jabberwocky the polecat splays overcredulity and sprays pay-phone. sent3: the peasant does not splay overcredulity if a Ophisaurus is not a dither. sent4: that the polecat does not splay overcredulity is not false if it is a kind of a cecum. sent5: the veal is vestiary. sent6: the substitute is not vestiary. sent7: the polecat does not communicate veal if the substitute is a Ophisaurus and/or is a cecum. sent8: if the peasant is not preventable the substitute is a Ophisaurus that does not communicate veal. sent9: if there is something such that that it is not a cecum and it splays overcredulity is incorrect the veal is not a soapwort. sent10: the zygote does not splay overcredulity if the polecat either is a Ophisaurus or is a jabberwocky or both. sent11: the polecat is a diplomacy if there exists something such that that it is not vestiary and it is not a cecum is not true. sent12: the substitute is a Ophisaurus but it does not dither. sent13: that the polecat is a cecum is right if it is not vestiary. sent14: if the peasant does not splay overcredulity that it is a kind of non-vestiary thing that is not a cecum is false. sent15: something is a coccus and it is preventable if it does not communicate veal. sent16: the fact that if either the peasant is a diplomacy or it is preventable or both the polecat is not vestiary is correct. sent17: that the veal is not a soapwort but it does dither is not correct if the substitute does not communicate veal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peasant is preventable.; assump1 -> int1: the peasant is either a diplomacy or preventable or both.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the polecat is not vestiary.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the polecat is a kind of a cecum.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the polecat does not splay overcredulity.; sent1 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a jabberwocky.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the polecat does splay overcredulity and sprays pay-phone.; int6 -> int7: the polecat splays overcredulity.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the peasant is not preventable.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the substitute is a kind of a Ophisaurus that does not communicate veal.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the substitute does not communicate veal hold.; int11 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the polecat is a kind of a diplomacy that is a coccus.
sent12 -> int12: there is something such that it is a kind of a Ophisaurus and it is not a kind of a dither.; int12 & sent3 -> int13: the peasant does not splay overcredulity.; sent14 & int13 -> int14: that the peasant is not vestiary and it is not a cecum is incorrect.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that that it is both not vestiary and not a cecum is false.; int15 & sent11 -> int16: the polecat is a diplomacy.; sent15 -> int17: if the fact that the polecat does not communicate veal hold then it is a coccus that is preventable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the veal is not a soapwort but it is a dither is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the zygote is not a jabberwocky. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a jabberwocky the polecat splays overcredulity and sprays pay-phone. sent3: the peasant does not splay overcredulity if a Ophisaurus is not a dither. sent4: that the polecat does not splay overcredulity is not false if it is a kind of a cecum. sent5: the veal is vestiary. sent6: the substitute is not vestiary. sent7: the polecat does not communicate veal if the substitute is a Ophisaurus and/or is a cecum. sent8: if the peasant is not preventable the substitute is a Ophisaurus that does not communicate veal. sent9: if there is something such that that it is not a cecum and it splays overcredulity is incorrect the veal is not a soapwort. sent10: the zygote does not splay overcredulity if the polecat either is a Ophisaurus or is a jabberwocky or both. sent11: the polecat is a diplomacy if there exists something such that that it is not vestiary and it is not a cecum is not true. sent12: the substitute is a Ophisaurus but it does not dither. sent13: that the polecat is a cecum is right if it is not vestiary. sent14: if the peasant does not splay overcredulity that it is a kind of non-vestiary thing that is not a cecum is false. sent15: something is a coccus and it is preventable if it does not communicate veal. sent16: the fact that if either the peasant is a diplomacy or it is preventable or both the polecat is not vestiary is correct. sent17: that the veal is not a soapwort but it does dither is not correct if the substitute does not communicate veal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peasant is preventable.; assump1 -> int1: the peasant is either a diplomacy or preventable or both.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the polecat is not vestiary.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the polecat is a kind of a cecum.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the polecat does not splay overcredulity.; sent1 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a jabberwocky.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the polecat does splay overcredulity and sprays pay-phone.; int6 -> int7: the polecat splays overcredulity.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the peasant is not preventable.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the substitute is a kind of a Ophisaurus that does not communicate veal.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the substitute does not communicate veal hold.; int11 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__