that the bank preoccupies stairwell is right.
sent1: that something is not isomeric and is not nephritic is incorrect if it does not preoccupy Cajun. sent2: something is not isomeric and it is not nephritic if it does preoccupy stairwell. sent3: that the prokaryote is a crying hold if the filtration is a crying. sent4: the bank is not a kind of a houseboat. sent5: if something that is not unobtrusive is a kind of a crying that it is not a humin is not false. sent6: the bank is non-isomeric if it does preoccupy stairwell. sent7: something marks gunite if the fact that it is not a kind of a pestle and/or it preoccupies mentum is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the bank is not caprine is not incorrect. sent9: if the filtration is untranslatable it is playful. sent10: if something is unobtrusive that it is not a humin and preoccupies Cajun is not true. sent11: that the gamin is both not a unprofitableness and nephritic is not right. sent12: the fact that the filtration is not a pestle or it preoccupies mentum or both does not hold if it is playful. sent13: the bank does not preoccupy Cajun and it is not a kind of a humin. sent14: if something is not a plumule then the fact that that it is not campylotropous and it is a radical is correct is not true. sent15: the stairwell is non-nephritic thing that does not marshal linen. sent16: if the prokaryote is a crying the gonococcus is a crying. sent17: the bank is not a kind of a humin. sent18: the ozokerite is unobtrusive if the gonococcus does cry. sent19: something is a crying if it does mark gunite.
sent2 -> int1: if the bank does preoccupy stairwell it is not isomeric and it is not nephritic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bank preoccupies stairwell.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bank is both not isomeric and not nephritic.; sent1 -> int3: if the bank does not preoccupy Cajun then the fact that it is not isomeric and it is not nephritic is not correct.; sent13 -> int4: the bank does not preoccupy Cajun.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the bank is not isomeric and not nephritic is not right.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the ozokerite does not preoccupy stairwell.
sent10 -> int7: if the ozokerite is unobtrusive that it is not a kind of a humin and it preoccupies Cajun is not right.; sent19 -> int8: the filtration is a crying if it marks gunite.; sent7 -> int9: the filtration marks gunite if that it is not a pestle or preoccupies mentum or both does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the bank preoccupies stairwell is right. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not isomeric and is not nephritic is incorrect if it does not preoccupy Cajun. sent2: something is not isomeric and it is not nephritic if it does preoccupy stairwell. sent3: that the prokaryote is a crying hold if the filtration is a crying. sent4: the bank is not a kind of a houseboat. sent5: if something that is not unobtrusive is a kind of a crying that it is not a humin is not false. sent6: the bank is non-isomeric if it does preoccupy stairwell. sent7: something marks gunite if the fact that it is not a kind of a pestle and/or it preoccupies mentum is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the bank is not caprine is not incorrect. sent9: if the filtration is untranslatable it is playful. sent10: if something is unobtrusive that it is not a humin and preoccupies Cajun is not true. sent11: that the gamin is both not a unprofitableness and nephritic is not right. sent12: the fact that the filtration is not a pestle or it preoccupies mentum or both does not hold if it is playful. sent13: the bank does not preoccupy Cajun and it is not a kind of a humin. sent14: if something is not a plumule then the fact that that it is not campylotropous and it is a radical is correct is not true. sent15: the stairwell is non-nephritic thing that does not marshal linen. sent16: if the prokaryote is a crying the gonococcus is a crying. sent17: the bank is not a kind of a humin. sent18: the ozokerite is unobtrusive if the gonococcus does cry. sent19: something is a crying if it does mark gunite. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the bank does preoccupy stairwell it is not isomeric and it is not nephritic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bank preoccupies stairwell.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bank is both not isomeric and not nephritic.; sent1 -> int3: if the bank does not preoccupy Cajun then the fact that it is not isomeric and it is not nephritic is not correct.; sent13 -> int4: the bank does not preoccupy Cajun.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the bank is not isomeric and not nephritic is not right.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__