that there exists something such that if it is a wireless the fact that it is not a kind of a horizontal and does not maintain accompaniment is incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the blackcock is not a wireless and is a Giza is wrong if it is apocryphal. sent2: if the blackcock is wireless then that it is a horizontal and it does not maintain accompaniment does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a wireless that it is horizontal and it does not maintain accompaniment does not hold. sent4: the blackcock is not a kind of a horizontal and it does not maintain accompaniment if it is a wireless. sent5: there is something such that if it is a wireless that it is not horizontal and does not maintain accompaniment is true. sent6: there exists something such that if it pleads that it is not abaxial and is a Congolese is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the blackcock is a wireless hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a horizontal and does not maintain accompaniment is not correct. sent8: that the accompaniment does not camouflage Vinylite and does not squish does not hold if it does maintain accompaniment. sent9: the fact that the blackcock is not an adventurism and it is not unpaid does not hold if it does maintain accompaniment. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Marcionism the fact that it does not detribalize allyl and it is not postpositive is not true. sent11: if something is unofficial then the fact that it is not a dirndl and is not an annotation is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if it does tighten Hamlet then the fact that it is not dualistic and it traverses is false. sent13: if the blackcock is a kind of a horizontal that it is not a kind of a pia and does camouflage blackcock is wrong. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a hire then the fact that it does not detribalize allyl and is a kind of a bosom does not hold.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is unofficial that it is both not a dirndl and not an annotation is wrong.
sent11 -> int1: if the Hamlet is unofficial the fact that it is not a dirndl and is not an annotation is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a wireless the fact that it is not a kind of a horizontal and does not maintain accompaniment is incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the blackcock is not a wireless and is a Giza is wrong if it is apocryphal. sent2: if the blackcock is wireless then that it is a horizontal and it does not maintain accompaniment does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a wireless that it is horizontal and it does not maintain accompaniment does not hold. sent4: the blackcock is not a kind of a horizontal and it does not maintain accompaniment if it is a wireless. sent5: there is something such that if it is a wireless that it is not horizontal and does not maintain accompaniment is true. sent6: there exists something such that if it pleads that it is not abaxial and is a Congolese is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the blackcock is a wireless hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a horizontal and does not maintain accompaniment is not correct. sent8: that the accompaniment does not camouflage Vinylite and does not squish does not hold if it does maintain accompaniment. sent9: the fact that the blackcock is not an adventurism and it is not unpaid does not hold if it does maintain accompaniment. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Marcionism the fact that it does not detribalize allyl and it is not postpositive is not true. sent11: if something is unofficial then the fact that it is not a dirndl and is not an annotation is wrong. sent12: there exists something such that if it does tighten Hamlet then the fact that it is not dualistic and it traverses is false. sent13: if the blackcock is a kind of a horizontal that it is not a kind of a pia and does camouflage blackcock is wrong. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a hire then the fact that it does not detribalize allyl and is a kind of a bosom does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__