that the shop awards birthright if the noncandidate is a kind of a precentorship is wrong.
sent1: the shop is a nightingale. sent2: the gearset is not thematic if the mulligan educes. sent3: something is a kind of a purposelessness. sent4: the fact that the mulligan educes is not wrong if the mantel is a purposelessness. sent5: if the gearset is not thematic then the shop does award birthright and it is a nightingale. sent6: that the mantel is a purposelessness and it is a precedent is not true if there exists something such that it is a precentorship. sent7: the fact that the mantel is both not a purposelessness and a precedent is incorrect if something is a precentorship. sent8: the mulligan does educe if that the mantel is not a kind of a purposelessness but it is a precedent is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noncandidate is a precentorship.; assump1 -> int1: something is a kind of a precentorship.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the mantel is not a purposelessness and is a precedent is false.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the mulligan does educe.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the gearset is not thematic.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the shop does award birthright and is a kind of a nightingale.; int5 -> int6: the shop does award birthright.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the shop awards birthright if the noncandidate is a kind of a precentorship is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the shop is a nightingale. sent2: the gearset is not thematic if the mulligan educes. sent3: something is a kind of a purposelessness. sent4: the fact that the mulligan educes is not wrong if the mantel is a purposelessness. sent5: if the gearset is not thematic then the shop does award birthright and it is a nightingale. sent6: that the mantel is a purposelessness and it is a precedent is not true if there exists something such that it is a precentorship. sent7: the fact that the mantel is both not a purposelessness and a precedent is incorrect if something is a precentorship. sent8: the mulligan does educe if that the mantel is not a kind of a purposelessness but it is a precedent is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noncandidate is a precentorship.; assump1 -> int1: something is a kind of a precentorship.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the mantel is not a purposelessness and is a precedent is false.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the mulligan does educe.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the gearset is not thematic.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the shop does award birthright and is a kind of a nightingale.; int5 -> int6: the shop does award birthright.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__