that if the Gallicness happens then that not the watercolor but the hiking happens is not correct is not true.
sent1: if the Gallicness happens the fact that the watercolor and the hiking occurs is false. sent2: the revoke does not occur if the deferral occurs and the Gallicness occurs. sent3: that not the Chilean but the canonistness happens prevents that the tapping occurs. sent4: that not the underquoting but the conceptualization happens is false if the radiolucentness happens. sent5: the fact that both the watercolor and the hike occurs is not right. sent6: that the Gallicness does not occur is brought about by that the watercolor occurs and the hiking happens. sent7: the fact that both the conceptualization and the consolidating chancery occurs is not right. sent8: the Gallicness does not occur if the watercolor does not occur and the hike happens. sent9: the emptying Rynchopidae does not occur. sent10: the sniffing exosphere does not occur. sent11: the watercolor does not occur. sent12: that both the non-radiolucentness and the homologousness occurs is not true. sent13: if the sniffing Turnicidae happens and the greeting occurs then the brokering does not occur. sent14: the fact that the outlet does not occur and the bismuthicness happens is not correct if the revoke does not occur. sent15: that the deferral occurs and the Gallicness occurs is caused by that the consolidating sharkskin does not occur. sent16: the watercolor does not occur and the hiking occurs if the Gallicness happens. sent17: that that not the watercolor but the hike happens hold prevents that the Gallicness does not occur. sent18: if the simianness happens then the fact that both the tap and the scalableness occurs is not true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the watercolor does not occur but the hiking occurs.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the Gallicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gallicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the watercolor but the hiking happens is not true.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that not the outlet but the bismuthicness happens is not true.
$hypothesis$ = that if the Gallicness happens then that not the watercolor but the hiking happens is not correct is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Gallicness happens the fact that the watercolor and the hiking occurs is false. sent2: the revoke does not occur if the deferral occurs and the Gallicness occurs. sent3: that not the Chilean but the canonistness happens prevents that the tapping occurs. sent4: that not the underquoting but the conceptualization happens is false if the radiolucentness happens. sent5: the fact that both the watercolor and the hike occurs is not right. sent6: that the Gallicness does not occur is brought about by that the watercolor occurs and the hiking happens. sent7: the fact that both the conceptualization and the consolidating chancery occurs is not right. sent8: the Gallicness does not occur if the watercolor does not occur and the hike happens. sent9: the emptying Rynchopidae does not occur. sent10: the sniffing exosphere does not occur. sent11: the watercolor does not occur. sent12: that both the non-radiolucentness and the homologousness occurs is not true. sent13: if the sniffing Turnicidae happens and the greeting occurs then the brokering does not occur. sent14: the fact that the outlet does not occur and the bismuthicness happens is not correct if the revoke does not occur. sent15: that the deferral occurs and the Gallicness occurs is caused by that the consolidating sharkskin does not occur. sent16: the watercolor does not occur and the hiking occurs if the Gallicness happens. sent17: that that not the watercolor but the hike happens hold prevents that the Gallicness does not occur. sent18: if the simianness happens then the fact that both the tap and the scalableness occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the watercolor does not occur but the hiking occurs.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the Gallicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gallicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the watercolor but the hiking happens is not true.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__