the fact that the wrangler is a kind of a solubility that is Markovian is not true.
sent1: if something is a kind of a solubility that it is not few and is Eucharistic is wrong. sent2: the wrangler does not disabuse Belshazzar. sent3: the bulb is not a say if that it is both not a clatter and a oldness is wrong. sent4: if the jodhpur is not a kind of a solubility then the wrangler is a solubility. sent5: the fact that the bulb does not clatter but it is a oldness is incorrect. sent6: the wrangler is not a say. sent7: the fact that the wrangler is not a oldness and is not a solubility is false. sent8: the fact that the wrangler is not a solubility but a lighted is not right. sent9: if the bulb is not a say the fact that the jodhpur is not a say and is a kind of a lighted is not right. sent10: the jodhpur is not a kind of a solubility if it does light. sent11: something is not a solubility if it is a lighted. sent12: if the bulb is not a say that the jodhpur is not a say and not lighted does not hold. sent13: the fact that the wrangler is a solubility is correct. sent14: the fact that the jodhpur is not a say but it is a kind of a lighted does not hold. sent15: the fact that the wrangler is not a solubility but a say is not right. sent16: the bulb does not say if it clatters. sent17: the bulb is both a oldness and a clatter if the jodhpur is not a oldness. sent18: that the bulb is a clatter and it is a oldness does not hold. sent19: something is not a solubility if that it is not a say and does not light is not right. sent20: the wrangler is not a oldness. sent21: if the bulb lights then that it is not a kind of a say and is not Markovian is not false. sent22: the wrangler is a solubility and it is Markovian if the jodhpur is not a solubility.
sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the bulb is not a say.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the jodhpur is both not a say and unlighted is incorrect.; sent19 -> int3: the jodhpur is not a kind of a solubility if the fact that it is not a say and not a lighted does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the jodhpur is not a solubility.; int4 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the wrangler is a solubility that is Markovian is true does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the wrangler is a kind of a solubility that is Markovian is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a solubility that it is not few and is Eucharistic is wrong. sent2: the wrangler does not disabuse Belshazzar. sent3: the bulb is not a say if that it is both not a clatter and a oldness is wrong. sent4: if the jodhpur is not a kind of a solubility then the wrangler is a solubility. sent5: the fact that the bulb does not clatter but it is a oldness is incorrect. sent6: the wrangler is not a say. sent7: the fact that the wrangler is not a oldness and is not a solubility is false. sent8: the fact that the wrangler is not a solubility but a lighted is not right. sent9: if the bulb is not a say the fact that the jodhpur is not a say and is a kind of a lighted is not right. sent10: the jodhpur is not a kind of a solubility if it does light. sent11: something is not a solubility if it is a lighted. sent12: if the bulb is not a say that the jodhpur is not a say and not lighted does not hold. sent13: the fact that the wrangler is a solubility is correct. sent14: the fact that the jodhpur is not a say but it is a kind of a lighted does not hold. sent15: the fact that the wrangler is not a solubility but a say is not right. sent16: the bulb does not say if it clatters. sent17: the bulb is both a oldness and a clatter if the jodhpur is not a oldness. sent18: that the bulb is a clatter and it is a oldness does not hold. sent19: something is not a solubility if that it is not a say and does not light is not right. sent20: the wrangler is not a oldness. sent21: if the bulb lights then that it is not a kind of a say and is not Markovian is not false. sent22: the wrangler is a solubility and it is Markovian if the jodhpur is not a solubility. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the bulb is not a say.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the jodhpur is both not a say and unlighted is incorrect.; sent19 -> int3: the jodhpur is not a kind of a solubility if the fact that it is not a say and not a lighted does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the jodhpur is not a solubility.; int4 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__