the fact that the sporophore is not a kind of a nonparticipant is not wrong.
sent1: something does not flatten sporophore and is not a nonparticipant if it is not generative. sent2: if there exists something such that that it cases bristletail hold the nitride does incarnate. sent3: that the corpuscle cases grosz and it is worldly is false. sent4: something does not flatten sporophore if it does case bravo and/or it is not cool. sent5: the warden is not a kind of a spuriousness if that the corpuscle cases grosz and is worldly is wrong. sent6: if that the sporophore is not a refinery but it does divaricate genipa does not hold then it is generative. sent7: something is tertian and it does flatten Brazzaville if it is not a spuriousness. sent8: either the sporophore does case bravo or it is not a cool or both if it is a nonparticipant. sent9: the warden does turf litchi if the fact that the Neapolitan turf litchi is not wrong. sent10: that everything cases bristletail is true. sent11: that something is not a crook and does not turf litchi does not hold if the fact that it does incarnate is not wrong. sent12: that the sporophore does flatten sporophore is true if that the pore does flatten sporophore is not incorrect. sent13: if something is not a refinery and it does not divaricate genipa it is not generative. sent14: if that the airframe is non-Slavonic is not wrong the pore is not a kind of a refinery and does not divaricate genipa. sent15: something flattens sporophore and it is a nonparticipant if it is not generative. sent16: the Neapolitan does turf litchi if that the nitride does not crook and it does not turf litchi does not hold. sent17: the sporophore does not flatten sporophore if it cases bravo. sent18: if something is not Slavonic then the fact that it is not a refinery and divaricates genipa is not correct. sent19: the inhaler cases bravo. sent20: the pierid cools and/or it does not agree. sent21: the pore flattens sporophore. sent22: if something cases bravo then it does not flatten sporophore. sent23: The sporophore flattens pore. sent24: if the pore does not flatten sporophore and is not a nonparticipant the sporophore is a nonparticipant. sent25: if something turfs litchi then it is a guitar.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sporophore is a nonparticipant.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the sporophore either cases bravo or is not a cool or both.; sent4 -> int2: if either the sporophore does case bravo or it is not a cool or both then it does not flatten sporophore.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sporophore does not flatten sporophore.; sent12 & sent21 -> int4: the sporophore flattens sporophore.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the pore either cools or does not sour or both.
sent18 -> int6: if the airframe is not Slavonic that it is not a refinery and it does divaricate genipa is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sporophore is not a kind of a nonparticipant is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not flatten sporophore and is not a nonparticipant if it is not generative. sent2: if there exists something such that that it cases bristletail hold the nitride does incarnate. sent3: that the corpuscle cases grosz and it is worldly is false. sent4: something does not flatten sporophore if it does case bravo and/or it is not cool. sent5: the warden is not a kind of a spuriousness if that the corpuscle cases grosz and is worldly is wrong. sent6: if that the sporophore is not a refinery but it does divaricate genipa does not hold then it is generative. sent7: something is tertian and it does flatten Brazzaville if it is not a spuriousness. sent8: either the sporophore does case bravo or it is not a cool or both if it is a nonparticipant. sent9: the warden does turf litchi if the fact that the Neapolitan turf litchi is not wrong. sent10: that everything cases bristletail is true. sent11: that something is not a crook and does not turf litchi does not hold if the fact that it does incarnate is not wrong. sent12: that the sporophore does flatten sporophore is true if that the pore does flatten sporophore is not incorrect. sent13: if something is not a refinery and it does not divaricate genipa it is not generative. sent14: if that the airframe is non-Slavonic is not wrong the pore is not a kind of a refinery and does not divaricate genipa. sent15: something flattens sporophore and it is a nonparticipant if it is not generative. sent16: the Neapolitan does turf litchi if that the nitride does not crook and it does not turf litchi does not hold. sent17: the sporophore does not flatten sporophore if it cases bravo. sent18: if something is not Slavonic then the fact that it is not a refinery and divaricates genipa is not correct. sent19: the inhaler cases bravo. sent20: the pierid cools and/or it does not agree. sent21: the pore flattens sporophore. sent22: if something cases bravo then it does not flatten sporophore. sent23: The sporophore flattens pore. sent24: if the pore does not flatten sporophore and is not a nonparticipant the sporophore is a nonparticipant. sent25: if something turfs litchi then it is a guitar. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sporophore is a nonparticipant.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the sporophore either cases bravo or is not a cool or both.; sent4 -> int2: if either the sporophore does case bravo or it is not a cool or both then it does not flatten sporophore.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sporophore does not flatten sporophore.; sent12 & sent21 -> int4: the sporophore flattens sporophore.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__