the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bimester it is catalatic is not true.
sent1: something is a preemie if it is tinny. sent2: the hobby is a bimester if it binds trough. sent3: if something is catalatic then it binds trough. sent4: the hobby is antagonistic if it is a obviousness. sent5: if the hobby is a bimester then it is catalatic. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it does pique urbanity is not false then it is a kind of a fenestration. sent7: the cress is a Viscum if it is catalatic. sent8: that there is something such that if it does stink then it is anastigmatic is not wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it is flowery it is a kind of a rowing. sent10: if something is a kind of a bunk then it is a afterworld. sent11: if the hobby is a pie then it frisks cress. sent12: there is something such that if it does commission it does frisk bash.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the hobby is tinny it is a preemie.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bimester it is catalatic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a preemie if it is tinny. sent2: the hobby is a bimester if it binds trough. sent3: if something is catalatic then it binds trough. sent4: the hobby is antagonistic if it is a obviousness. sent5: if the hobby is a bimester then it is catalatic. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it does pique urbanity is not false then it is a kind of a fenestration. sent7: the cress is a Viscum if it is catalatic. sent8: that there is something such that if it does stink then it is anastigmatic is not wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it is flowery it is a kind of a rowing. sent10: if something is a kind of a bunk then it is a afterworld. sent11: if the hobby is a pie then it frisks cress. sent12: there is something such that if it does commission it does frisk bash. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__