the guru is a kind of a Flemish.
sent1: if something is a bouncing then it does not deduce Circumcision. sent2: the cracker is not alexic if the loofah is not a alexic and it does not adjust. sent3: if the loofah is not forte it is not a kind of a alexic and it does not adjust. sent4: the cracker is not a alexic if it does not deduce merit. sent5: the rhinestone is agricultural if something that does deduce Circumcision is a Lemaitre. sent6: the guru is a Lemaitre if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Lemaitre and it recognizes is not right. sent7: there is something such that that it is not a Lemaitre and does recognize is not correct. sent8: something does not deduce merit but it does deduce Circumcision if it is Flemish. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not deduce Circumcision and it is a alexic is not right. sent10: the guru is not agricultural. sent11: the loofah is non-forte. sent12: the rhinestone is both not a bouncing and not agricultural if the cracker is non-alexic.
sent8 -> int1: if the guru is a Flemish it does not deduce merit and it does deduce Circumcision.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the guru is a Flemish hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the guru does not deduce merit but it deduces Circumcision.; int2 -> int3: the guru deduces Circumcision.; sent7 & sent6 -> int4: the guru is a Lemaitre.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the guru does deduce Circumcision and is a Lemaitre.; int5 -> int6: something deduces Circumcision and it is a kind of a Lemaitre.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the rhinestone is agricultural.; sent3 & sent11 -> int8: the loofah is not alexic and does not adjust.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the cracker is not a kind of a alexic.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the rhinestone is not a kind of a bouncing and it is not agricultural.; int10 -> int11: the rhinestone is not agricultural.; int7 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the guru is a kind of a Flemish. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a bouncing then it does not deduce Circumcision. sent2: the cracker is not alexic if the loofah is not a alexic and it does not adjust. sent3: if the loofah is not forte it is not a kind of a alexic and it does not adjust. sent4: the cracker is not a alexic if it does not deduce merit. sent5: the rhinestone is agricultural if something that does deduce Circumcision is a Lemaitre. sent6: the guru is a Lemaitre if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Lemaitre and it recognizes is not right. sent7: there is something such that that it is not a Lemaitre and does recognize is not correct. sent8: something does not deduce merit but it does deduce Circumcision if it is Flemish. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not deduce Circumcision and it is a alexic is not right. sent10: the guru is not agricultural. sent11: the loofah is non-forte. sent12: the rhinestone is both not a bouncing and not agricultural if the cracker is non-alexic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the guru is a Flemish it does not deduce merit and it does deduce Circumcision.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the guru is a Flemish hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the guru does not deduce merit but it deduces Circumcision.; int2 -> int3: the guru deduces Circumcision.; sent7 & sent6 -> int4: the guru is a Lemaitre.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the guru does deduce Circumcision and is a Lemaitre.; int5 -> int6: something deduces Circumcision and it is a kind of a Lemaitre.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the rhinestone is agricultural.; sent3 & sent11 -> int8: the loofah is not alexic and does not adjust.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the cracker is not a kind of a alexic.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the rhinestone is not a kind of a bouncing and it is not agricultural.; int10 -> int11: the rhinestone is not agricultural.; int7 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__