that there is something such that if it is a eyelessness or it does not construct scarecrow or both the fact that it is a nosedive is not incorrect is not right.
sent1: something that either is a moosewood or is not cathodic or both wraps program. sent2: the stiffener does fold if it is a lorikeet and/or it is not a kind of a quetzal. sent3: there is something such that if it constructs Moloch and/or does not flounce then it is not non-bacillar. sent4: something is a kind of a parenthetical if it is fashionable or is not impolitic or both. sent5: something is a kind of a orangery if it wraps noun or does not construct fantasy or both. sent6: if the stiffener is a Dufy and/or it is not a eyelessness it is a wencher. sent7: there is something such that if it does not construct scarecrow then it does nosedive. sent8: something does tint if it is a kind of a shaker and/or does not construct Dasyproctidae. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a eyelessness and/or it does construct scarecrow that it does nosedive is true. sent10: there exists something such that if it does hunger chained and/or it does not converge that it is toneless is correct. sent11: if something is a eyelessness and/or does not construct scarecrow it is a nosedive. sent12: there is something such that if it either is logistic or does wrap walloper or both then the fact that it constructs benchmark is not incorrect. sent13: something that either constructs clocksmith or is not allomorphic or both is a Pempheridae. sent14: if the stiffener is a eyelessness and/or does not hunger labored then it is plumbaginaceous. sent15: there is something such that if it is a headscarf and/or does hunger halite it is a kind of a wencher. sent16: there is something such that if it does construct placket or it is not non-macerative or both then it is opaque. sent17: if either the stiffener is a eyelessness or it constructs scarecrow or both it is a nosedive. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a eyelessness then it does nosedive. sent19: the stiffener is a kind of a nosedive if it is a kind of a eyelessness. sent20: there exists something such that if either it is a Salmonidae or it is not a Ameiurus or both it wraps zoologist.
sent11 -> int1: if that the stiffener is a kind of a eyelessness or it does not construct scarecrow or both is not incorrect that it is a kind of a nosedive is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if either the zoologist constructs clocksmith or it is non-allomorphic or both it is a Pempheridae.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a eyelessness or it does not construct scarecrow or both the fact that it is a nosedive is not incorrect is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something that either is a moosewood or is not cathodic or both wraps program. sent2: the stiffener does fold if it is a lorikeet and/or it is not a kind of a quetzal. sent3: there is something such that if it constructs Moloch and/or does not flounce then it is not non-bacillar. sent4: something is a kind of a parenthetical if it is fashionable or is not impolitic or both. sent5: something is a kind of a orangery if it wraps noun or does not construct fantasy or both. sent6: if the stiffener is a Dufy and/or it is not a eyelessness it is a wencher. sent7: there is something such that if it does not construct scarecrow then it does nosedive. sent8: something does tint if it is a kind of a shaker and/or does not construct Dasyproctidae. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a eyelessness and/or it does construct scarecrow that it does nosedive is true. sent10: there exists something such that if it does hunger chained and/or it does not converge that it is toneless is correct. sent11: if something is a eyelessness and/or does not construct scarecrow it is a nosedive. sent12: there is something such that if it either is logistic or does wrap walloper or both then the fact that it constructs benchmark is not incorrect. sent13: something that either constructs clocksmith or is not allomorphic or both is a Pempheridae. sent14: if the stiffener is a eyelessness and/or does not hunger labored then it is plumbaginaceous. sent15: there is something such that if it is a headscarf and/or does hunger halite it is a kind of a wencher. sent16: there is something such that if it does construct placket or it is not non-macerative or both then it is opaque. sent17: if either the stiffener is a eyelessness or it constructs scarecrow or both it is a nosedive. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a eyelessness then it does nosedive. sent19: the stiffener is a kind of a nosedive if it is a kind of a eyelessness. sent20: there exists something such that if either it is a Salmonidae or it is not a Ameiurus or both it wraps zoologist. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if that the stiffener is a kind of a eyelessness or it does not construct scarecrow or both is not incorrect that it is a kind of a nosedive is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__