the commonsness happens and the forming happens.
sent1: the fact that the staining but not the disunion occurs is wrong. sent2: the judicialness does not occur if the fact that the staining but not the disunion happens is not true. sent3: the demographicness does not occur if the bedrest happens and the jamming Myocastor does not occur. sent4: the non-demographicness yields that both the commonsness and the judicialness happens. sent5: if the blanketing bottlecap occurs then the bedrest occurs but the jamming Myocastor does not occur. sent6: that the appendectomy does not occur triggers that the blanketing bottlecap and the jamming oculomotor happens. sent7: that the commonsness happens and the form happens is incorrect if the fact that the judicialness does not occur is correct.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the judicialness does not occur.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the twirling does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the commonsness happens and the forming happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the staining but not the disunion occurs is wrong. sent2: the judicialness does not occur if the fact that the staining but not the disunion happens is not true. sent3: the demographicness does not occur if the bedrest happens and the jamming Myocastor does not occur. sent4: the non-demographicness yields that both the commonsness and the judicialness happens. sent5: if the blanketing bottlecap occurs then the bedrest occurs but the jamming Myocastor does not occur. sent6: that the appendectomy does not occur triggers that the blanketing bottlecap and the jamming oculomotor happens. sent7: that the commonsness happens and the form happens is incorrect if the fact that the judicialness does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the judicialness does not occur.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__