the Para is not a tackler and it is not evitable.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is not a Idaho then the oyabun is nonspecific and is not a kind of a postdoctoral. sent2: everything is a kind of a overplus that insufflates strengthener. sent3: the half-caste does insufflate oyabun and is not evitable if the poler is not evitable. sent4: the mouthpart is not a Idaho. sent5: the fact that the Para is a kind of a tackler but it is not evitable does not hold if the half-caste is not evitable. sent6: if the oyabun is quarterly then the fact that the fact that the Leo does like and/or does not insufflate oyabun is incorrect hold. sent7: that the Para is a tackler but it is not evitable is not right. sent8: the poler is not evitable if there exists something such that it insufflates strengthener or reheats quarters or both. sent9: the fact that the Para is not a tackler and not evitable is wrong if the half-caste is not evitable. sent10: the Para is a kind of a overplus but it is not a kind of a tackler. sent11: the fact that the fact that everything is a overplus hold is not false. sent12: the fact that the half-caste is evitable and it is ohmic is true if it does not insufflate oyabun. sent13: if the poler is not a overplus the Para is not a tackler and it is not evitable. sent14: if either something is evitable or it insufflates strengthener or both then the barker does not reheat quarters. sent15: that the half-caste is a tackler but it is not evitable is not true. sent16: the half-caste does insufflate oyabun. sent17: the poler is a dustpan and is nonharmonic if the half-caste is not a overplus. sent18: the barker either is a overplus or is evitable or both. sent19: the agapanthus is evitable. sent20: a ohmic thing insufflates strengthener and does not reheat quarters. sent21: the barker is a overplus. sent22: the oyabun is a quarterly if it is nonspecific and it is not a postdoctoral. sent23: the poler is not evitable if something reheats quarters.
sent2 -> int1: the barker is a overplus and does insufflate strengthener.; int1 -> int2: the barker insufflates strengthener.; int2 -> int3: either the barker does insufflate strengthener or it does reheat quarters or both.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it either does insufflate strengthener or reheats quarters or both.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the poler is not evitable.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the half-caste does insufflate oyabun and is not evitable.; int6 -> int7: the half-caste is not evitable.; sent9 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Para is not a tackler and not evitable.
sent20 -> int8: the half-caste insufflates strengthener and does not reheat quarters if that it is ohmic is not false.; sent4 -> int9: something is not a Idaho.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: that the oyabun is nonspecific but it is not postdoctoral is not false.; sent22 & int10 -> int11: the oyabun is quarterly.; sent6 & int11 -> int12: that the Leo is a like or does not insufflate oyabun or both is not true.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a like and/or it does not insufflate oyabun is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Para is not a tackler and it is not evitable. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is not a Idaho then the oyabun is nonspecific and is not a kind of a postdoctoral. sent2: everything is a kind of a overplus that insufflates strengthener. sent3: the half-caste does insufflate oyabun and is not evitable if the poler is not evitable. sent4: the mouthpart is not a Idaho. sent5: the fact that the Para is a kind of a tackler but it is not evitable does not hold if the half-caste is not evitable. sent6: if the oyabun is quarterly then the fact that the fact that the Leo does like and/or does not insufflate oyabun is incorrect hold. sent7: that the Para is a tackler but it is not evitable is not right. sent8: the poler is not evitable if there exists something such that it insufflates strengthener or reheats quarters or both. sent9: the fact that the Para is not a tackler and not evitable is wrong if the half-caste is not evitable. sent10: the Para is a kind of a overplus but it is not a kind of a tackler. sent11: the fact that the fact that everything is a overplus hold is not false. sent12: the fact that the half-caste is evitable and it is ohmic is true if it does not insufflate oyabun. sent13: if the poler is not a overplus the Para is not a tackler and it is not evitable. sent14: if either something is evitable or it insufflates strengthener or both then the barker does not reheat quarters. sent15: that the half-caste is a tackler but it is not evitable is not true. sent16: the half-caste does insufflate oyabun. sent17: the poler is a dustpan and is nonharmonic if the half-caste is not a overplus. sent18: the barker either is a overplus or is evitable or both. sent19: the agapanthus is evitable. sent20: a ohmic thing insufflates strengthener and does not reheat quarters. sent21: the barker is a overplus. sent22: the oyabun is a quarterly if it is nonspecific and it is not a postdoctoral. sent23: the poler is not evitable if something reheats quarters. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the barker is a overplus and does insufflate strengthener.; int1 -> int2: the barker insufflates strengthener.; int2 -> int3: either the barker does insufflate strengthener or it does reheat quarters or both.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it either does insufflate strengthener or reheats quarters or both.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the poler is not evitable.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the half-caste does insufflate oyabun and is not evitable.; int6 -> int7: the half-caste is not evitable.; sent9 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__