the resisting Hagiographa does not occur.
sent1: both the schooling clinocephaly and the cyprianness happens. sent2: the ranching does not occur if the amble and/or the anaerobicness occurs. sent3: if the hemodynamicness does not occur but the eradication happens then the fact that the cathedralness occurs is not incorrect. sent4: the non-extropicness leads to that the aestheticness and the elaborating happens. sent5: that not the inaestheticness but the elaborating happens is incorrect if the resisting psychobabble does not occur. sent6: the resisting psychobabble does not occur. sent7: if not the intracranialness but the curtainlessness happens the butt-welding happens. sent8: that the footlessness does not occur is not false if the extropicness occurs and/or the strangulating abatement occurs. sent9: if both the footedness and the schooling clinocephaly occurs then the fact that the resisting Hagiographa occurs is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the extropicness does not occur is true.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the aestheticness and the elaborating occurs.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that both the non-inaestheticness and the elaborating happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the extropicness happens.; int4 -> int5: the extropicness happens or the strangulating abatement happens or both.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the footlessness does not occur.; sent1 -> int7: the schooling clinocephaly happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the footlessness does not occur and the schooling clinocephaly happens.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the resisting Hagiographa does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the schooling clinocephaly and the cyprianness happens. sent2: the ranching does not occur if the amble and/or the anaerobicness occurs. sent3: if the hemodynamicness does not occur but the eradication happens then the fact that the cathedralness occurs is not incorrect. sent4: the non-extropicness leads to that the aestheticness and the elaborating happens. sent5: that not the inaestheticness but the elaborating happens is incorrect if the resisting psychobabble does not occur. sent6: the resisting psychobabble does not occur. sent7: if not the intracranialness but the curtainlessness happens the butt-welding happens. sent8: that the footlessness does not occur is not false if the extropicness occurs and/or the strangulating abatement occurs. sent9: if both the footedness and the schooling clinocephaly occurs then the fact that the resisting Hagiographa occurs is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the extropicness does not occur is true.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the aestheticness and the elaborating occurs.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that both the non-inaestheticness and the elaborating happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the extropicness happens.; int4 -> int5: the extropicness happens or the strangulating abatement happens or both.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the footlessness does not occur.; sent1 -> int7: the schooling clinocephaly happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the footlessness does not occur and the schooling clinocephaly happens.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__