the manipulator hounds manipulator and/or is not commutable.
sent1: the enamel is a misconstruction. sent2: if the fact that the cuttlefish does not talc and it is not pubertal is true then the guestroom is not a kind of a talc. sent3: the mock-up does not backstop honoree and is alopecic. sent4: if the amobarbital is palatable then it is a sallet. sent5: the fact that the amobarbital is not a kind of a Roosevelt and it does not use is incorrect. sent6: if the amobarbital backstops diacritic then the precursor is a nicotine. sent7: if the manipulator is a sallet it is not a nicotine. sent8: if something that is a nicotine is a misconstruction the manipulator is a sallet. sent9: if the cuttlefish does hound manipulator then the fact that the guestroom is commutable is not false. sent10: that the amobarbital is a kind of a Roosevelt but it does not use is not true. sent11: if something is a kind of a nicotine then the fact that it does hound manipulator and/or it is not commutable is incorrect. sent12: that that the tomatillo is not a veil and is not a faille hold is wrong if there exists something such that it veil. sent13: if something is not a sallet then the fact that it does not backstop sire and is a misconstruction is not right. sent14: the manipulator is a kind of a Roosevelt or it is not commutable or both. sent15: the precursor is a misconstruction. sent16: that the manipulator is both not critical and not gutsy is incorrect. sent17: if that the precursor is a nicotine and/or it does not backstop diacritic does not hold then the amobarbital is a kind of a veil. sent18: if the guestroom is not a talc it is not alopecic and it does not backstop honoree. sent19: that the precursor is a nicotine or it does not backstop diacritic or both does not hold if that the manipulator is not a misconstruction is not incorrect. sent20: if there exists something such that it does not backstop honoree the cuttlefish does backstop sire and/or it hounds manipulator. sent21: if the fact that the precursor does not backstop sire and is a misconstruction is not right then the amobarbital is not a misconstruction. sent22: the fact that the cuttlefish does not talc and it is not pubertal is not incorrect. sent23: the guestroom is commutable if the cuttlefish does backstop sire. sent24: if the amobarbital is not a kind of a nicotine and it does not backstop diacritic the manipulator is a nicotine. sent25: the manipulator is not commutable if it is a sallet. sent26: if the fact that the amobarbital is not a Roosevelt and it does not use is wrong then it backstops diacritic.
sent26 & sent5 -> int1: the amobarbital backstops diacritic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the precursor is a nicotine is right.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the precursor is a nicotine and it is a kind of a misconstruction.; int3 -> int4: something is a kind of a nicotine that is a misconstruction.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the manipulator is a sallet.; int5 & sent25 -> int6: the manipulator is not commutable.; int6 -> hypothesis;
that the manipulator does hound manipulator and/or it is not commutable does not hold.
sent11 -> int7: the fact that the fact that either the manipulator hounds manipulator or it is not commutable or both is not true if the manipulator is a nicotine is not wrong.; sent13 -> int8: that the precursor does not backstop sire but it is a misconstruction is false if the fact that it is not a sallet is not false.; sent2 & sent22 -> int9: the guestroom does not talc.; sent18 & int9 -> int10: the guestroom is not alopecic and it does not backstop honoree.; int10 -> int11: something is non-alopecic thing that does not backstop honoree.;
$hypothesis$ = the manipulator hounds manipulator and/or is not commutable. ; $context$ = sent1: the enamel is a misconstruction. sent2: if the fact that the cuttlefish does not talc and it is not pubertal is true then the guestroom is not a kind of a talc. sent3: the mock-up does not backstop honoree and is alopecic. sent4: if the amobarbital is palatable then it is a sallet. sent5: the fact that the amobarbital is not a kind of a Roosevelt and it does not use is incorrect. sent6: if the amobarbital backstops diacritic then the precursor is a nicotine. sent7: if the manipulator is a sallet it is not a nicotine. sent8: if something that is a nicotine is a misconstruction the manipulator is a sallet. sent9: if the cuttlefish does hound manipulator then the fact that the guestroom is commutable is not false. sent10: that the amobarbital is a kind of a Roosevelt but it does not use is not true. sent11: if something is a kind of a nicotine then the fact that it does hound manipulator and/or it is not commutable is incorrect. sent12: that that the tomatillo is not a veil and is not a faille hold is wrong if there exists something such that it veil. sent13: if something is not a sallet then the fact that it does not backstop sire and is a misconstruction is not right. sent14: the manipulator is a kind of a Roosevelt or it is not commutable or both. sent15: the precursor is a misconstruction. sent16: that the manipulator is both not critical and not gutsy is incorrect. sent17: if that the precursor is a nicotine and/or it does not backstop diacritic does not hold then the amobarbital is a kind of a veil. sent18: if the guestroom is not a talc it is not alopecic and it does not backstop honoree. sent19: that the precursor is a nicotine or it does not backstop diacritic or both does not hold if that the manipulator is not a misconstruction is not incorrect. sent20: if there exists something such that it does not backstop honoree the cuttlefish does backstop sire and/or it hounds manipulator. sent21: if the fact that the precursor does not backstop sire and is a misconstruction is not right then the amobarbital is not a misconstruction. sent22: the fact that the cuttlefish does not talc and it is not pubertal is not incorrect. sent23: the guestroom is commutable if the cuttlefish does backstop sire. sent24: if the amobarbital is not a kind of a nicotine and it does not backstop diacritic the manipulator is a nicotine. sent25: the manipulator is not commutable if it is a sallet. sent26: if the fact that the amobarbital is not a Roosevelt and it does not use is wrong then it backstops diacritic. ; $proof$ = 
sent26 & sent5 -> int1: the amobarbital backstops diacritic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the precursor is a nicotine is right.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the precursor is a nicotine and it is a kind of a misconstruction.; int3 -> int4: something is a kind of a nicotine that is a misconstruction.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the manipulator is a sallet.; int5 & sent25 -> int6: the manipulator is not commutable.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__