the tanbark is non-robust.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-happy thing that does not insert mastoidectomy is not right the tanbark is not robust. sent2: a handyman is not a Pasch. sent3: the blockade-runner is not underage if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of underage thing that does unbosom is wrong. sent4: if a feverish thing is few then it is not gerundial. sent5: if the blockade-runner is not a Pasch and is not underage then the chemistry is not a kind of a Pasch. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-happy thing that does insert mastoidectomy does not hold. sent7: the blockade-runner is a handyman. sent8: that the fodder is happy and does not insert mastoidectomy is false. sent9: a relative is a few. sent10: that the fodder is unhappy thing that does not insert mastoidectomy is not right if the aquatics does insert trepidation. sent11: there is something such that that it is underage and it does unbosom is not true. sent12: if that the chemistry is a Pasch is wrong then the fodder is feverish. sent13: the aquatics does not insert mastoidectomy if there is something such that the fact that it is not robust and it does not insert trepidation does not hold. sent14: the aquatics is a bug. sent15: The trepidation does insert aquatics. sent16: the tanbark is non-robust if there exists something such that it is happy. sent17: the tanbark inserts trepidation. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is happy thing that does not insert mastoidectomy is not correct. sent19: the fodder does stratify fodder and is a relative. sent20: the aquatics is robust or inserts trepidation or both if something is not gerundial.
that the tanbark is robust is not wrong.
sent4 -> int1: if the fodder is feverish and it is a few then it is not gerundial.; sent2 -> int2: the blockade-runner is not a Pasch if it is a handyman.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the blockade-runner is not a Pasch.; sent11 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the blockade-runner is not underage is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the blockade-runner is not a kind of a Pasch and it is not underage.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the chemistry is not a Pasch.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the fodder is feverish.; sent9 -> int8: the fodder is a few if it is a relative.; sent19 -> int9: the fodder is a kind of a relative.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fodder is a few.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the fodder is feverish and it is a kind of a few.; int1 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the fodder is not gerundial is not wrong.; int12 -> int13: there are non-gerundial things.; int13 & sent20 -> int14: the aquatics is robust and/or it does insert trepidation.;
$hypothesis$ = the tanbark is non-robust. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-happy thing that does not insert mastoidectomy is not right the tanbark is not robust. sent2: a handyman is not a Pasch. sent3: the blockade-runner is not underage if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of underage thing that does unbosom is wrong. sent4: if a feverish thing is few then it is not gerundial. sent5: if the blockade-runner is not a Pasch and is not underage then the chemistry is not a kind of a Pasch. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-happy thing that does insert mastoidectomy does not hold. sent7: the blockade-runner is a handyman. sent8: that the fodder is happy and does not insert mastoidectomy is false. sent9: a relative is a few. sent10: that the fodder is unhappy thing that does not insert mastoidectomy is not right if the aquatics does insert trepidation. sent11: there is something such that that it is underage and it does unbosom is not true. sent12: if that the chemistry is a Pasch is wrong then the fodder is feverish. sent13: the aquatics does not insert mastoidectomy if there is something such that the fact that it is not robust and it does not insert trepidation does not hold. sent14: the aquatics is a bug. sent15: The trepidation does insert aquatics. sent16: the tanbark is non-robust if there exists something such that it is happy. sent17: the tanbark inserts trepidation. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is happy thing that does not insert mastoidectomy is not correct. sent19: the fodder does stratify fodder and is a relative. sent20: the aquatics is robust or inserts trepidation or both if something is not gerundial. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__