there exists something such that if it is not a centerfold and it is not vulvar then it is not a kind of a lamprey.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a micrometry and predates vicissitude then it is not a kind of a demoralization. sent2: the bull's-eye is non-amnesic if it is not a feed and it is not dipterous. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-dipterous a fugue then it is not a imaret. sent4: something does not predate barrack if it is intrusive and it is not dextral. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not squinch frotteur and is efficient it is not sociobiologic. sent6: if something that does not adolesce does not squinch Arctocephalus then it is not a poplar. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a centerfold and it is not vulvar then it is a lamprey is not false. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a feed and it is not basinal it does not pour. sent9: there is something such that if it is a kind of non-capillary thing that does not respond then it does not predate maintenance. sent10: something is not a kind of a Acinonyx if it is not a kind of a nafcillin and does not scout Muller. sent11: if something that is not a centerfold is vulvar then it is not a lamprey. sent12: if something is not a kind of a centerfold and it is not vulvar it is a kind of a lamprey. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both a centerfold and not vulvar then the fact that it is not a lamprey is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the frotteur is not the lamprey if the frotteur is a centerfold but it is not vulvar hold.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a centerfold and it is not vulvar then it is not a kind of a lamprey. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a micrometry and predates vicissitude then it is not a kind of a demoralization. sent2: the bull's-eye is non-amnesic if it is not a feed and it is not dipterous. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-dipterous a fugue then it is not a imaret. sent4: something does not predate barrack if it is intrusive and it is not dextral. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not squinch frotteur and is efficient it is not sociobiologic. sent6: if something that does not adolesce does not squinch Arctocephalus then it is not a poplar. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a centerfold and it is not vulvar then it is a lamprey is not false. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a feed and it is not basinal it does not pour. sent9: there is something such that if it is a kind of non-capillary thing that does not respond then it does not predate maintenance. sent10: something is not a kind of a Acinonyx if it is not a kind of a nafcillin and does not scout Muller. sent11: if something that is not a centerfold is vulvar then it is not a lamprey. sent12: if something is not a kind of a centerfold and it is not vulvar it is a kind of a lamprey. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both a centerfold and not vulvar then the fact that it is not a lamprey is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the frotteur is not the lamprey if the frotteur is a centerfold but it is not vulvar hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__