the salad does not defray abocclusion.
sent1: if the seta is non-congestive then that the salad is non-congestive but not indefeasible does not hold. sent2: the seta tempers contemptuousness but it is not a literate. sent3: the seta is not a kind of a literate. sent4: if something is not a kind of a Saskatchewan then it is not congestive. sent5: if the fact that something is not congestive and it is not indefeasible is wrong that it defrays abocclusion is right. sent6: if something does temper contemptuousness it is not a Saskatchewan. sent7: the fact that the salad is both not congestive and not indefeasible does not hold if the seta is not congestive. sent8: something defrays abocclusion if it is congestive.
sent2 -> int1: the seta tempers contemptuousness.; sent6 -> int2: the seta is not a Saskatchewan if it tempers contemptuousness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the seta is not a kind of a Saskatchewan.; sent4 -> int4: if the fact that the seta is not a Saskatchewan is not false then it is not congestive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the seta is not congestive.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the salad is non-congestive thing that is not indefeasible does not hold.; sent5 -> int7: the salad defrays abocclusion if the fact that it is non-congestive thing that is not indefeasible is not correct.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the salad does not defray abocclusion. ; $context$ = sent1: if the seta is non-congestive then that the salad is non-congestive but not indefeasible does not hold. sent2: the seta tempers contemptuousness but it is not a literate. sent3: the seta is not a kind of a literate. sent4: if something is not a kind of a Saskatchewan then it is not congestive. sent5: if the fact that something is not congestive and it is not indefeasible is wrong that it defrays abocclusion is right. sent6: if something does temper contemptuousness it is not a Saskatchewan. sent7: the fact that the salad is both not congestive and not indefeasible does not hold if the seta is not congestive. sent8: something defrays abocclusion if it is congestive. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the seta tempers contemptuousness.; sent6 -> int2: the seta is not a Saskatchewan if it tempers contemptuousness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the seta is not a kind of a Saskatchewan.; sent4 -> int4: if the fact that the seta is not a Saskatchewan is not false then it is not congestive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the seta is not congestive.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the salad is non-congestive thing that is not indefeasible does not hold.; sent5 -> int7: the salad defrays abocclusion if the fact that it is non-congestive thing that is not indefeasible is not correct.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__