the fact that there exists something such that it is a amitriptyline and it does induce Pipilo is false.
sent1: the babirusa does salt. sent2: the fact that the quick undercuts spinning and does not induce Labor does not hold. sent3: if the quick induces Pipilo but it does not induce Labor it does not salt. sent4: that the mock-up does induce Pipilo is not false. sent5: the mock-up undercuts pyrophosphate if the fact that the quick does not undercut spinning and it does not induce Labor is not right. sent6: if the quick does not undercut pyrophosphate and does not induce Labor then it does not undercut spinning. sent7: the quick is not a salt if it does not undercut spinning and induces Labor. sent8: if the mock-up does not undercut pyrophosphate and does salt it does not induce Pipilo. sent9: That the Pipilo does induce mock-up is not false. sent10: something is a amitriptyline. sent11: the links undercuts pyrophosphate and it is a Trollius. sent12: there is something such that it induces Pipilo and it is a salt. sent13: the fact that the mock-up does not undercut spinning but it induces Pipilo is wrong. sent14: the quick is a kind of a amitriptyline. sent15: if the babirusa is a kind of a salt the quick salt. sent16: the babirusa does meddle. sent17: the quick is not a kind of a salt if it does not undercut spinning and does not induce Labor. sent18: there exists something such that it undercuts spinning. sent19: if the mock-up is not a salt and undercuts spinning it is not a amitriptyline. sent20: if the babirusa does not induce Pipilo the fact that the mock-up is not a kind of a salt but it is a amitriptyline is not correct. sent21: if that the mock-up undercuts pyrophosphate is not incorrect then it is a amitriptyline.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quick does not undercut spinning and does not induce Labor.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the quick is not a salt.; sent15 & sent1 -> int2: the quick salts.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the quick does not undercut spinning and it does not induce Labor does not hold.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the mock-up does undercut pyrophosphate.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the mock-up is a kind of a amitriptyline.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the mock-up is a amitriptyline and it induces Pipilo.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the quick does not undercut pyrophosphate is true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is a amitriptyline and it does induce Pipilo is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the babirusa does salt. sent2: the fact that the quick undercuts spinning and does not induce Labor does not hold. sent3: if the quick induces Pipilo but it does not induce Labor it does not salt. sent4: that the mock-up does induce Pipilo is not false. sent5: the mock-up undercuts pyrophosphate if the fact that the quick does not undercut spinning and it does not induce Labor is not right. sent6: if the quick does not undercut pyrophosphate and does not induce Labor then it does not undercut spinning. sent7: the quick is not a salt if it does not undercut spinning and induces Labor. sent8: if the mock-up does not undercut pyrophosphate and does salt it does not induce Pipilo. sent9: That the Pipilo does induce mock-up is not false. sent10: something is a amitriptyline. sent11: the links undercuts pyrophosphate and it is a Trollius. sent12: there is something such that it induces Pipilo and it is a salt. sent13: the fact that the mock-up does not undercut spinning but it induces Pipilo is wrong. sent14: the quick is a kind of a amitriptyline. sent15: if the babirusa is a kind of a salt the quick salt. sent16: the babirusa does meddle. sent17: the quick is not a kind of a salt if it does not undercut spinning and does not induce Labor. sent18: there exists something such that it undercuts spinning. sent19: if the mock-up is not a salt and undercuts spinning it is not a amitriptyline. sent20: if the babirusa does not induce Pipilo the fact that the mock-up is not a kind of a salt but it is a amitriptyline is not correct. sent21: if that the mock-up undercuts pyrophosphate is not incorrect then it is a amitriptyline. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quick does not undercut spinning and does not induce Labor.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the quick is not a salt.; sent15 & sent1 -> int2: the quick salts.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the quick does not undercut spinning and it does not induce Labor does not hold.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the mock-up does undercut pyrophosphate.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the mock-up is a kind of a amitriptyline.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the mock-up is a amitriptyline and it induces Pipilo.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__