the gouache is anapestic.
sent1: the gouache is Unitarian. sent2: something is a cryometer that hauls if it is not a vaulting. sent3: the chevre does not malt businesswoman. sent4: the chevre does top SCLK if that the whydah top SCLK is not wrong. sent5: something is not a vaulting if it malts Gracilariidae. sent6: if something does not haul the fact that it malts Gracilariidae and it is a methocarbamol hold. sent7: if the gouache is not anapestic then that the chevre is a methocarbamol and it is a Unitarian does not hold. sent8: the chevre does haul if it does not vault. sent9: that that the gouache is a kind of a Unitarian but it does not vault is not true is correct if the chevre does not malt Gracilariidae. sent10: the smaltite is a kind of uncousinly thing that is unmalicious. sent11: that the gouache does not malt Gracilariidae is not incorrect. sent12: the chevre is not non-mensural if that that it does grub theosophy and is not a audiometer is not wrong is not correct. sent13: if the chevre tops SCLK it is not a cryometer and it does not haul. sent14: if the gouache does not malt Gracilariidae then the coupling is anapestic and not Unitarian. sent15: the fact that the chevre hauls is correct. sent16: the gouache is a kind of a cryometer and it is a decoupage. sent17: the pieta is a methocarbamol and it does syllogize. sent18: that the gouache is a Hohenzollern and not a vaulting does not hold. sent19: if the chevre is Unitarian it does malt Gracilariidae. sent20: the fact that the chevre is a kind of a methocarbamol that is Unitarian is incorrect. sent21: the chevre is not a cryometer. sent22: if that the chevre is a methocarbamol and is not a kind of a Unitarian is not true then it does malt Gracilariidae.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gouache is not anapestic.; sent5 -> int1: if the chevre does malt Gracilariidae that it does not vault is true.; sent2 -> int2: the chevre is a cryometer that does haul if it is not a kind of a vaulting.;
the coupling is not a kind of a Unitarian.
$hypothesis$ = the gouache is anapestic. ; $context$ = sent1: the gouache is Unitarian. sent2: something is a cryometer that hauls if it is not a vaulting. sent3: the chevre does not malt businesswoman. sent4: the chevre does top SCLK if that the whydah top SCLK is not wrong. sent5: something is not a vaulting if it malts Gracilariidae. sent6: if something does not haul the fact that it malts Gracilariidae and it is a methocarbamol hold. sent7: if the gouache is not anapestic then that the chevre is a methocarbamol and it is a Unitarian does not hold. sent8: the chevre does haul if it does not vault. sent9: that that the gouache is a kind of a Unitarian but it does not vault is not true is correct if the chevre does not malt Gracilariidae. sent10: the smaltite is a kind of uncousinly thing that is unmalicious. sent11: that the gouache does not malt Gracilariidae is not incorrect. sent12: the chevre is not non-mensural if that that it does grub theosophy and is not a audiometer is not wrong is not correct. sent13: if the chevre tops SCLK it is not a cryometer and it does not haul. sent14: if the gouache does not malt Gracilariidae then the coupling is anapestic and not Unitarian. sent15: the fact that the chevre hauls is correct. sent16: the gouache is a kind of a cryometer and it is a decoupage. sent17: the pieta is a methocarbamol and it does syllogize. sent18: that the gouache is a Hohenzollern and not a vaulting does not hold. sent19: if the chevre is Unitarian it does malt Gracilariidae. sent20: the fact that the chevre is a kind of a methocarbamol that is Unitarian is incorrect. sent21: the chevre is not a cryometer. sent22: if that the chevre is a methocarbamol and is not a kind of a Unitarian is not true then it does malt Gracilariidae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gouache is not anapestic.; sent5 -> int1: if the chevre does malt Gracilariidae that it does not vault is true.; sent2 -> int2: the chevre is a cryometer that does haul if it is not a kind of a vaulting.; __UNKNOWN__