the fact that the roll-on does not reward saintliness is right.
sent1: there are non-animalistic things. sent2: if that the anathema is a signer and does not reward saintliness does not hold then the chapterhouse is acrogenic. sent3: that the chapterhouse is both not unadaptable and a militainment is not correct. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not acrogenic and not a militainment is false then the termination is not wasteful. sent5: if there is something such that it is not animalistic that the anathema is non-wasteful thing that is not acrogenic is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that it does sober. sent7: the termination is a signer. sent8: the roll-on is not a kind of a signer if there exists something such that that it does not reward saintliness and is not wasteful is not true. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a militainment that the termination rewards saintliness and is not a signer does not hold. sent10: that the anathema is a kind of non-wasteful thing that is not a signer is incorrect. sent11: there are animalistic things. sent12: something is not wasteful if that it is not animalistic or it is acrogenic or both is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that it is not wasteful and is not acrogenic. sent14: that the roll-on rewards saintliness if that the chapterhouse is unadaptable thing that is not a signer is not correct is right. sent15: the fact that the chapterhouse is adaptable thing that is wasteful does not hold. sent16: the termination is not a militainment if there exists something such that the fact that it is not wasteful and is non-acrogenic is incorrect. sent17: the jacquard does rummage quilted. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not acrogenic the fact that the anathema does reward saintliness and is not a kind of a signer is not right. sent19: if there is something such that that it is non-wasteful thing that is not a militainment is not correct then the termination is not acrogenic. sent20: the fact that the chapterhouse is unadaptable but it is not a signer does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a militainment.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: that the anathema is not wasteful and it is not acrogenic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not wasteful and it is not acrogenic is wrong.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the termination is not a militainment.; int3 -> int4: something is not a kind of a militainment.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the fact that the chapterhouse is unadaptable but it is not a signer does not hold.; sent14 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the saury is not wasteful.
sent12 -> int6: if that the saury is not animalistic or it is acrogenic or both is false then it is not wasteful.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the roll-on does not reward saintliness is right. ; $context$ = sent1: there are non-animalistic things. sent2: if that the anathema is a signer and does not reward saintliness does not hold then the chapterhouse is acrogenic. sent3: that the chapterhouse is both not unadaptable and a militainment is not correct. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not acrogenic and not a militainment is false then the termination is not wasteful. sent5: if there is something such that it is not animalistic that the anathema is non-wasteful thing that is not acrogenic is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that it does sober. sent7: the termination is a signer. sent8: the roll-on is not a kind of a signer if there exists something such that that it does not reward saintliness and is not wasteful is not true. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a militainment that the termination rewards saintliness and is not a signer does not hold. sent10: that the anathema is a kind of non-wasteful thing that is not a signer is incorrect. sent11: there are animalistic things. sent12: something is not wasteful if that it is not animalistic or it is acrogenic or both is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that it is not wasteful and is not acrogenic. sent14: that the roll-on rewards saintliness if that the chapterhouse is unadaptable thing that is not a signer is not correct is right. sent15: the fact that the chapterhouse is adaptable thing that is wasteful does not hold. sent16: the termination is not a militainment if there exists something such that the fact that it is not wasteful and is non-acrogenic is incorrect. sent17: the jacquard does rummage quilted. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not acrogenic the fact that the anathema does reward saintliness and is not a kind of a signer is not right. sent19: if there is something such that that it is non-wasteful thing that is not a militainment is not correct then the termination is not acrogenic. sent20: the fact that the chapterhouse is unadaptable but it is not a signer does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a militainment. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: that the anathema is not wasteful and it is not acrogenic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not wasteful and it is not acrogenic is wrong.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the termination is not a militainment.; int3 -> int4: something is not a kind of a militainment.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the fact that the chapterhouse is unadaptable but it is not a signer does not hold.; sent14 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__