the pullet is a kind of a Kabbalah.
sent1: if the bacitracin occidentalizes Tantalus and it is not non-innocuous the pullet is not a Kabbalah. sent2: if something is monoecious it is not a kind of a trainee. sent3: if the bacitracin is not cryogenics it does occidentalize Tantalus. sent4: something does occidentalize stubbornness. sent5: something is a trainee. sent6: something is credible if it does not horripilate appealing. sent7: if something is not cryogenics then it does occidentalize Tantalus and it is innocuous. sent8: if the retrorocket is not incredible the bacitracin is non-cryogenics. sent9: the bacitracin does occidentalize Tantalus. sent10: the pullet horripilates appealing and it is credible if the retrorocket is not cryogenics. sent11: something is not cryogenics if it occidentalizes Tantalus and is innocuous. sent12: if there exists something such that it does occidentalize stubbornness that the bacitracin either is monoecious or occidentalize stubbornness or both is right. sent13: something is a Kabbalah if the fact that it does not horripilate Mosul and is not a Kabbalah is not correct. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a trainee is not wrong then the fact that the retrorocket does not horripilate Mosul hold. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a trainee. sent16: if something horripilates appealing then that it does not horripilate Mosul and it is not a Kabbalah is false. sent17: if that something is not cryogenics is true it occidentalizes Tantalus. sent18: the retrorocket horripilates Mosul if it does horripilate appealing. sent19: the retrorocket occidentalizes Tantalus and is innocuous if the fact that it is not a kind of a trainee is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retrorocket does horripilate appealing.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the retrorocket horripilates Mosul.; sent15 & sent14 -> int2: the retrorocket does not horripilate Mosul.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the retrorocket does not horripilate appealing.; sent6 -> int5: the retrorocket is credible if that it does not horripilate appealing is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the retrorocket is credible.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the bacitracin is non-cryogenics.; sent7 -> int8: the bacitracin does occidentalize Tantalus and it is innocuous if it is non-cryogenics.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the bacitracin does occidentalize Tantalus and it is innocuous.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the pullet is a Kabbalah.
sent13 -> int10: if that the pullet does not horripilate Mosul and is not a kind of a Kabbalah is not right then the fact that it is a Kabbalah is not false.; sent16 -> int11: if the pullet horripilates appealing the fact that it does not horripilate Mosul and is not a Kabbalah is false.; sent11 -> int12: if the retrorocket does occidentalize Tantalus and is innocuous it is not cryogenics.; sent2 -> int13: the retrorocket is not a kind of a trainee if it is monoecious.; sent4 & sent12 -> int14: the bacitracin is monoecious or occidentalizes stubbornness or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the pullet is a kind of a Kabbalah. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bacitracin occidentalizes Tantalus and it is not non-innocuous the pullet is not a Kabbalah. sent2: if something is monoecious it is not a kind of a trainee. sent3: if the bacitracin is not cryogenics it does occidentalize Tantalus. sent4: something does occidentalize stubbornness. sent5: something is a trainee. sent6: something is credible if it does not horripilate appealing. sent7: if something is not cryogenics then it does occidentalize Tantalus and it is innocuous. sent8: if the retrorocket is not incredible the bacitracin is non-cryogenics. sent9: the bacitracin does occidentalize Tantalus. sent10: the pullet horripilates appealing and it is credible if the retrorocket is not cryogenics. sent11: something is not cryogenics if it occidentalizes Tantalus and is innocuous. sent12: if there exists something such that it does occidentalize stubbornness that the bacitracin either is monoecious or occidentalize stubbornness or both is right. sent13: something is a Kabbalah if the fact that it does not horripilate Mosul and is not a Kabbalah is not correct. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a trainee is not wrong then the fact that the retrorocket does not horripilate Mosul hold. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a trainee. sent16: if something horripilates appealing then that it does not horripilate Mosul and it is not a Kabbalah is false. sent17: if that something is not cryogenics is true it occidentalizes Tantalus. sent18: the retrorocket horripilates Mosul if it does horripilate appealing. sent19: the retrorocket occidentalizes Tantalus and is innocuous if the fact that it is not a kind of a trainee is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retrorocket does horripilate appealing.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the retrorocket horripilates Mosul.; sent15 & sent14 -> int2: the retrorocket does not horripilate Mosul.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the retrorocket does not horripilate appealing.; sent6 -> int5: the retrorocket is credible if that it does not horripilate appealing is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the retrorocket is credible.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the bacitracin is non-cryogenics.; sent7 -> int8: the bacitracin does occidentalize Tantalus and it is innocuous if it is non-cryogenics.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the bacitracin does occidentalize Tantalus and it is innocuous.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__