the stunner does not adjoin carrot and is not dactylic.
sent1: if the lanyard does not emulsify Aulostomidae the brushwood is testicular but it is not alkalotic. sent2: the ergosterol does not emulsify wastebasket. sent3: the propulsion is a kind of a solid and does engineer. sent4: if the fact that the sago is not a follicle hold it is not a headstream but a pragmatics. sent5: the aberration does emulsify segment. sent6: if the Afro-wig does not emulsify Aulostomidae and does not remodel Herrick the lanyard does not emulsify Aulostomidae. sent7: the Aztec is a kind of a pancake if something that is testicular is non-alkalotic. sent8: if the aberration does not adjoin carrot the stunner does not adjoin carrot and is not dactylic. sent9: the ergosterol is a pragmatics if the sago is not a headstream but it is a kind of a pragmatics. sent10: the clomiphene is not a kind of a valedictorian if there is something such that it is solid and it does engineer. sent11: something does photograph soup if it does not emulsify wastebasket. sent12: the segment is not accipitrine if the fact that the aberration is accipitrine thing that does not adjoin carrot is wrong. sent13: the fact that the aberration is dactylic is true if the fact that the glycerol is not a kind of a brachiopod and it does not remodel handover is not right. sent14: the kitchenware is not dactylic. sent15: the airbrush does remodel subfamily. sent16: that the sago is not a follicle if the airbrush remodels subfamily is not false. sent17: if something is a kind of a pancake the fact that the glycerol is non-brachiopod thing that does not remodel handover is wrong. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of resistible a blepharism is false then the Afro-wig does not emulsify Aulostomidae. sent19: that the aberration does not remodel encephalopathy is not wrong. sent20: the aberration is accipitrine and emulsifies segment. sent21: the fact that that something is resistible and it is a blepharism is not false is not true if it is not a valedictorian. sent22: if the ergosterol photographs soup and it is not non-pragmatics then that the Afro-wig remodels Herrick is wrong.
the fact that the stunner does not adjoin carrot and is not dactylic is not right.
sent21 -> int1: if the clomiphene is not a valedictorian that it is resistible and it is a blepharism is wrong.; sent3 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a kind of solid thing that is an engineer.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the clomiphene is not a valedictorian.; int1 & int3 -> int4: that the clomiphene is resistible and is a kind of a blepharism is not right.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is resistible thing that is a blepharism is not right.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the Afro-wig does not emulsify Aulostomidae.; sent11 -> int7: if the ergosterol does not emulsify wastebasket it does photograph soup.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: that the ergosterol photographs soup is right.; sent16 & sent15 -> int9: the sago is not a kind of a follicle.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the sago is not a headstream but it is a pragmatics.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the ergosterol is a kind of a pragmatics.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the ergosterol does photograph soup and is a pragmatics.; sent22 & int12 -> int13: the Afro-wig does not remodel Herrick.; int6 & int13 -> int14: the Afro-wig does not emulsify Aulostomidae and it does not remodel Herrick.; sent6 & int14 -> int15: the lanyard does not emulsify Aulostomidae.; sent1 & int15 -> int16: the brushwood is testicular but it is not alkalotic.; int16 -> int17: something is testicular but it is non-alkalotic.; int17 & sent7 -> int18: the Aztec is a pancake.; int18 -> int19: something is a pancake.; int19 & sent17 -> int20: that the glycerol is not a kind of a brachiopod and it does not remodel handover is incorrect.; sent13 & int20 -> int21: the aberration is dactylic.; int21 -> int22: something is dactylic.;
$hypothesis$ = the stunner does not adjoin carrot and is not dactylic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lanyard does not emulsify Aulostomidae the brushwood is testicular but it is not alkalotic. sent2: the ergosterol does not emulsify wastebasket. sent3: the propulsion is a kind of a solid and does engineer. sent4: if the fact that the sago is not a follicle hold it is not a headstream but a pragmatics. sent5: the aberration does emulsify segment. sent6: if the Afro-wig does not emulsify Aulostomidae and does not remodel Herrick the lanyard does not emulsify Aulostomidae. sent7: the Aztec is a kind of a pancake if something that is testicular is non-alkalotic. sent8: if the aberration does not adjoin carrot the stunner does not adjoin carrot and is not dactylic. sent9: the ergosterol is a pragmatics if the sago is not a headstream but it is a kind of a pragmatics. sent10: the clomiphene is not a kind of a valedictorian if there is something such that it is solid and it does engineer. sent11: something does photograph soup if it does not emulsify wastebasket. sent12: the segment is not accipitrine if the fact that the aberration is accipitrine thing that does not adjoin carrot is wrong. sent13: the fact that the aberration is dactylic is true if the fact that the glycerol is not a kind of a brachiopod and it does not remodel handover is not right. sent14: the kitchenware is not dactylic. sent15: the airbrush does remodel subfamily. sent16: that the sago is not a follicle if the airbrush remodels subfamily is not false. sent17: if something is a kind of a pancake the fact that the glycerol is non-brachiopod thing that does not remodel handover is wrong. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of resistible a blepharism is false then the Afro-wig does not emulsify Aulostomidae. sent19: that the aberration does not remodel encephalopathy is not wrong. sent20: the aberration is accipitrine and emulsifies segment. sent21: the fact that that something is resistible and it is a blepharism is not false is not true if it is not a valedictorian. sent22: if the ergosterol photographs soup and it is not non-pragmatics then that the Afro-wig remodels Herrick is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__