the spray is not a nominal.
sent1: if the conger is a kind of a short that the staggerbush is a fakery but it is not a short is wrong. sent2: the keratinization does not tweedle restatement and is calyptrate if it is not an antiviral. sent3: the keratinization is not a kind of an antiviral. sent4: if something is non-equatorial thing that is not a kind of a short then it is not a nominal. sent5: if the conger is an equatorial then the spray is not non-short. sent6: the conger is an errand. sent7: something is a kind of a allopathy. sent8: something is a kind of an errand and it is a allopathy. sent9: if the fact that the staggerbush is a fakery but it is not a kind of a short is not true then it is an equatorial. sent10: that the conger is a kind of a short is not false if there exists something such that it is not an errand and it is a kind of a allopathy. sent11: that the staggerbush is a fakery and short is not correct if the conger is short. sent12: the conger is a kind of a fakery if the staggerbush is a kind of a fakery and/or it is not eugenics. sent13: that the staggerbush is a fakery and is short is false. sent14: a cervine thing is a fakery and/or is not eugenics. sent15: the conger is not cervine if something is not nominal and it does not shatter. sent16: something is cervine if the fact that it is eugenics is not incorrect. sent17: the spray is eugenics if the fact that the staggerbush is not a kind of an equatorial is incorrect. sent18: the staggerbush is not nominal and it does not shatter. sent19: there is something such that it is not a kind of an errand. sent20: that the staggerbush is an equatorial is right if it is short. sent21: something is a nominal if it is cervine. sent22: the accretion is not a kind of an errand but it is a allopathy. sent23: the accretion is a allopathy. sent24: if the callus is not a kind of a scatter then the staggerbush is cervine and it does shatter.
sent22 -> int1: that something is not an errand but it is a allopathy is correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the conger is a short.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the staggerbush is a kind of a fakery but it is not short is not correct.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the staggerbush is an equatorial.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the spray is eugenics.; sent16 -> int6: if the spray is eugenics then it is cervine.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the spray is cervine.; sent21 -> int8: the spray is a nominal if it is cervine.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the spray is a kind of a short.
sent18 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not a nominal and it does not shatter.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the conger is not cervine.;
$hypothesis$ = the spray is not a nominal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the conger is a kind of a short that the staggerbush is a fakery but it is not a short is wrong. sent2: the keratinization does not tweedle restatement and is calyptrate if it is not an antiviral. sent3: the keratinization is not a kind of an antiviral. sent4: if something is non-equatorial thing that is not a kind of a short then it is not a nominal. sent5: if the conger is an equatorial then the spray is not non-short. sent6: the conger is an errand. sent7: something is a kind of a allopathy. sent8: something is a kind of an errand and it is a allopathy. sent9: if the fact that the staggerbush is a fakery but it is not a kind of a short is not true then it is an equatorial. sent10: that the conger is a kind of a short is not false if there exists something such that it is not an errand and it is a kind of a allopathy. sent11: that the staggerbush is a fakery and short is not correct if the conger is short. sent12: the conger is a kind of a fakery if the staggerbush is a kind of a fakery and/or it is not eugenics. sent13: that the staggerbush is a fakery and is short is false. sent14: a cervine thing is a fakery and/or is not eugenics. sent15: the conger is not cervine if something is not nominal and it does not shatter. sent16: something is cervine if the fact that it is eugenics is not incorrect. sent17: the spray is eugenics if the fact that the staggerbush is not a kind of an equatorial is incorrect. sent18: the staggerbush is not nominal and it does not shatter. sent19: there is something such that it is not a kind of an errand. sent20: that the staggerbush is an equatorial is right if it is short. sent21: something is a nominal if it is cervine. sent22: the accretion is not a kind of an errand but it is a allopathy. sent23: the accretion is a allopathy. sent24: if the callus is not a kind of a scatter then the staggerbush is cervine and it does shatter. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: that something is not an errand but it is a allopathy is correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the conger is a short.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the staggerbush is a kind of a fakery but it is not short is not correct.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the staggerbush is an equatorial.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the spray is eugenics.; sent16 -> int6: if the spray is eugenics then it is cervine.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the spray is cervine.; sent21 -> int8: the spray is a nominal if it is cervine.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__