there is something such that if it is a tobramycin the fact that it is not a kind of a hammerlock and it is a Plantation is not right.
sent1: the fact that something is not a tobramycin but it is a wobble does not hold if it descries spermatophyte. sent2: if the viaduct is a tobramycin then the fact that it is a hammerlock and it is a Plantation does not hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the viaduct is dramatics and it is a Plantation is not right is right if it is a kind of a sultana. sent4: if the polder is anamorphic then it is not a Rundstedt and it consumes. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a tobramycin then it is not a hammerlock and it is a Plantation. sent6: if that the viaduct is a tobramycin is correct the fact that it is both not a hammerlock and a Plantation is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a fabulist that it does not disembowel sprag and is an innocence does not hold. sent8: that the viaduct is multiform and it is a SOB does not hold if that it is a hammerlock hold. sent9: if the pave is a kind of a Plantation then it is not a knockout and it is a kind of a SOB. sent10: if the viaduct is a kind of a tobramycin then that it is non-diploid thing that ravels is not correct. sent11: if the viaduct is a tobramycin that it is not a hammerlock but a Plantation does not hold.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
if that the bristle does descry spermatophyte is not incorrect then that that it is not a kind of a tobramycin and it does wobble is not false does not hold.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a tobramycin the fact that it is not a kind of a hammerlock and it is a Plantation is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a tobramycin but it is a wobble does not hold if it descries spermatophyte. sent2: if the viaduct is a tobramycin then the fact that it is a hammerlock and it is a Plantation does not hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the viaduct is dramatics and it is a Plantation is not right is right if it is a kind of a sultana. sent4: if the polder is anamorphic then it is not a Rundstedt and it consumes. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a tobramycin then it is not a hammerlock and it is a Plantation. sent6: if that the viaduct is a tobramycin is correct the fact that it is both not a hammerlock and a Plantation is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a fabulist that it does not disembowel sprag and is an innocence does not hold. sent8: that the viaduct is multiform and it is a SOB does not hold if that it is a hammerlock hold. sent9: if the pave is a kind of a Plantation then it is not a knockout and it is a kind of a SOB. sent10: if the viaduct is a kind of a tobramycin then that it is non-diploid thing that ravels is not correct. sent11: if the viaduct is a tobramycin that it is not a hammerlock but a Plantation does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__