there is something such that if that it is a strawboard is correct that it is not a kind of a nettle and it is nonexploratory is wrong.
sent1: if something is a strawboard then the fact that it is a nettle and it is nonexploratory is wrong. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a lygaeid the fact that it does not defibrillate proclivity and it is a Realtor is not right. sent3: if something is not exploratory the fact that it is not Aleutian and it does unmake radiographer is not right. sent4: if the baronet is quadratics it is not a monotone but extracellular. sent5: there is something such that if it is a strawboard it is both not a nettle and nonexploratory. sent6: that the baronet is a kind of non-attitudinal a Senegalese is not true if it is nonexploratory. sent7: that something is not a kind of a platitudinarian and defibrillates proclivity is wrong if it is a wordnet. sent8: the marjoram is not a nettle but it eliminates organophosphate if the fact that it is a techie is not false. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a strawboard the fact that it is a nettle that is nonexploratory does not hold. sent10: if the second is a saprolite then that the fact that it is both not a nettle and a derangement is right does not hold. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a haymow hold then that it is not a kind of a bioflavinoid and does ape does not hold is not false. sent12: there is something such that if it is replaceable then the fact that it does not unmake radiographer and it does unmake PTSD does not hold. sent13: that the Libra is both brachiopod and not non-biocatalytic is false if it unmakes plowman. sent14: something is not a nettle but it is nonexploratory if it is a kind of a strawboard. sent15: the fact that the baronet is nonexploratory and it is an inference is not true if it is a Czech.
that the hydrofluorocarbon is not Aleutian but it does unmake radiographer does not hold if it is nonexploratory.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a strawboard is correct that it is not a kind of a nettle and it is nonexploratory is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a strawboard then the fact that it is a nettle and it is nonexploratory is wrong. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a lygaeid the fact that it does not defibrillate proclivity and it is a Realtor is not right. sent3: if something is not exploratory the fact that it is not Aleutian and it does unmake radiographer is not right. sent4: if the baronet is quadratics it is not a monotone but extracellular. sent5: there is something such that if it is a strawboard it is both not a nettle and nonexploratory. sent6: that the baronet is a kind of non-attitudinal a Senegalese is not true if it is nonexploratory. sent7: that something is not a kind of a platitudinarian and defibrillates proclivity is wrong if it is a wordnet. sent8: the marjoram is not a nettle but it eliminates organophosphate if the fact that it is a techie is not false. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a strawboard the fact that it is a nettle that is nonexploratory does not hold. sent10: if the second is a saprolite then that the fact that it is both not a nettle and a derangement is right does not hold. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a haymow hold then that it is not a kind of a bioflavinoid and does ape does not hold is not false. sent12: there is something such that if it is replaceable then the fact that it does not unmake radiographer and it does unmake PTSD does not hold. sent13: that the Libra is both brachiopod and not non-biocatalytic is false if it unmakes plowman. sent14: something is not a nettle but it is nonexploratory if it is a kind of a strawboard. sent15: the fact that the baronet is nonexploratory and it is an inference is not true if it is a Czech. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__