the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is a litigant and incorporates Cacajao does not hold does not hold.
sent1: the shellac is parhelic. sent2: if the shellac is Solomonic and tinsels facility the stolon does not incorporate ectrodactyly. sent3: that the ohmmeter is not a litigant and does not incorporate Cacajao does not hold. sent4: that the shellac is parhelic is incorrect if the stolon is not a rail but it incorporates ectrodactyly. sent5: if the workhouse does not promote and is Jacobinic then the padrone is not a mastoid. sent6: if the ohmmeter is not a rail the workhouse does not promote but it is Jacobinic. sent7: the workhouse does not promote and is parhelic if the fact that the shellac does not tinsel facility is not wrong. sent8: that the stolon is not intramural but it is a mho is incorrect. sent9: if the stolon does not incorporate ectrodactyly that the tidy is a kind of a litigant that incorporates Cacajao does not hold. sent10: the shellac does tinsel facility if the padrone is not a mastoid but it is a top. sent11: the supremo is not conscientious but it is permissive. sent12: the workhouse is not a rail if it is Solomonic and it does not incorporate ectrodactyly. sent13: the padrone proves. sent14: that the tidy is a kind of top thing that is a litigant does not hold. sent15: the workhouse does not promote. sent16: if something does not tinsel facility the shellac is top an arsenal. sent17: that the padrone is a kind of non-top a Tennyson is not true. sent18: if that the padrone is non-top a Tennyson is wrong then that it is a top is not incorrect. sent19: something is a litigant that does incorporate Cacajao. sent20: the shellac is not a Tennyson if the padrone is parhelic and it tops. sent21: the shellac is Solomonic and it is parhelic. sent22: the stolon is a kind of a rail. sent23: the workhouse is not a Tennyson. sent24: if the fact that something does rail but it is not a kind of a mastoid is not correct then it is a Tennyson. sent25: the padrone incorporates ectrodactyly. sent26: the ohmmeter is not a kind of a rail. sent27: if the fact that the ohmmeter is not a litigant and it does not incorporate Cacajao is not right it does not tinsel facility. sent28: the padrone is not mastoid if the workhouse does promote and it is Jacobinic. sent29: the workhouse does not promote if the ohmmeter is not a rail.
sent6 & sent26 -> int1: the workhouse does not promote and is Jacobinic.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the padrone is not a kind of a mastoid.; sent18 & sent17 -> int3: that the padrone is a kind of a top is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the padrone is not a kind of a mastoid but it tops.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the shellac does tinsel facility.; sent21 -> int6: the shellac is not non-Solomonic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the shellac is not non-Solomonic and does tinsel facility.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the stolon does not incorporate ectrodactyly.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the tidy is a litigant and it incorporates Cacajao is not true.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the shellac is an arsenal and it is a Tennyson.
sent27 & sent3 -> int10: the ohmmeter does not tinsel facility.; int10 -> int11: something does not tinsel facility.; int11 & sent16 -> int12: the shellac is a top and an arsenal.; int12 -> int13: the shellac is a kind of an arsenal.; sent24 -> int14: the shellac is a kind of a Tennyson if the fact that it is a kind of a rail and it is not a mastoid does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is a litigant and incorporates Cacajao does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the shellac is parhelic. sent2: if the shellac is Solomonic and tinsels facility the stolon does not incorporate ectrodactyly. sent3: that the ohmmeter is not a litigant and does not incorporate Cacajao does not hold. sent4: that the shellac is parhelic is incorrect if the stolon is not a rail but it incorporates ectrodactyly. sent5: if the workhouse does not promote and is Jacobinic then the padrone is not a mastoid. sent6: if the ohmmeter is not a rail the workhouse does not promote but it is Jacobinic. sent7: the workhouse does not promote and is parhelic if the fact that the shellac does not tinsel facility is not wrong. sent8: that the stolon is not intramural but it is a mho is incorrect. sent9: if the stolon does not incorporate ectrodactyly that the tidy is a kind of a litigant that incorporates Cacajao does not hold. sent10: the shellac does tinsel facility if the padrone is not a mastoid but it is a top. sent11: the supremo is not conscientious but it is permissive. sent12: the workhouse is not a rail if it is Solomonic and it does not incorporate ectrodactyly. sent13: the padrone proves. sent14: that the tidy is a kind of top thing that is a litigant does not hold. sent15: the workhouse does not promote. sent16: if something does not tinsel facility the shellac is top an arsenal. sent17: that the padrone is a kind of non-top a Tennyson is not true. sent18: if that the padrone is non-top a Tennyson is wrong then that it is a top is not incorrect. sent19: something is a litigant that does incorporate Cacajao. sent20: the shellac is not a Tennyson if the padrone is parhelic and it tops. sent21: the shellac is Solomonic and it is parhelic. sent22: the stolon is a kind of a rail. sent23: the workhouse is not a Tennyson. sent24: if the fact that something does rail but it is not a kind of a mastoid is not correct then it is a Tennyson. sent25: the padrone incorporates ectrodactyly. sent26: the ohmmeter is not a kind of a rail. sent27: if the fact that the ohmmeter is not a litigant and it does not incorporate Cacajao is not right it does not tinsel facility. sent28: the padrone is not mastoid if the workhouse does promote and it is Jacobinic. sent29: the workhouse does not promote if the ohmmeter is not a rail. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent26 -> int1: the workhouse does not promote and is Jacobinic.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the padrone is not a kind of a mastoid.; sent18 & sent17 -> int3: that the padrone is a kind of a top is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the padrone is not a kind of a mastoid but it tops.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the shellac does tinsel facility.; sent21 -> int6: the shellac is not non-Solomonic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the shellac is not non-Solomonic and does tinsel facility.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the stolon does not incorporate ectrodactyly.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the tidy is a litigant and it incorporates Cacajao is not true.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__