that if the Hebraicness does not occur both the liveliness and the lunching ribbon happens is not correct.
sent1: the hydroplaning happens and the liveliness occurs. sent2: the lunching ribbon is brought about by that the terpsichoreanness occurs and/or the Hebraicness does not occur. sent3: the reforming and the diachronicness occurs if the lunching lorry does not occur. sent4: the diachronicness does not occur. sent5: the Simonizing Cuminum happens or the lunching dahl does not occur or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hebraicness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the terpsichoreanness occurs and/or the Hebraicness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the lunching ribbon happens.; sent1 -> int3: the liveliness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the liveliness occurs and the lunching ribbon occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the Hebraicness does not occur both the liveliness and the lunching ribbon happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the hydroplaning happens and the liveliness occurs. sent2: the lunching ribbon is brought about by that the terpsichoreanness occurs and/or the Hebraicness does not occur. sent3: the reforming and the diachronicness occurs if the lunching lorry does not occur. sent4: the diachronicness does not occur. sent5: the Simonizing Cuminum happens or the lunching dahl does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hebraicness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the terpsichoreanness occurs and/or the Hebraicness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the lunching ribbon happens.; sent1 -> int3: the liveliness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the liveliness occurs and the lunching ribbon occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__