that the caprifig is a constituent and not celestial if the propylene is cybernetics is wrong.
sent1: if the propylene is celestial the caprifig is a constituent but it is not a blister. sent2: if the propylene is cybernetics then the caprifig is not celestial. sent3: the caprifig is not celestial. sent4: the obsessive is cybernetics but not a Danish if it is a constituent. sent5: the propylene is a kind of a blister that is not a constituent if the caprifig is celestial. sent6: if the obsessive is a constituent then the caprifig is not celestial. sent7: the caprifig is cybernetics thing that is not a kind of a constituent if the propylene does blister. sent8: if the waterway does blast then that it is not celestial and it is a constituent is not right. sent9: that the obsessive is a constituent is true if the propylene blisters and it is a Danish. sent10: the caprifig is a constituent but it is not celestial if the obsessive is a constituent. sent11: if the obsessive is celestial then the caprifig is celestial but it is not a constituent. sent12: the caprifig is a constituent that is not cybernetics if that the obsessive is a kind of a Danish hold. sent13: if the propylene is cybernetics it blisters and it is non-Danish. sent14: if the propylene is cybernetics then it is not a kind of a Danish. sent15: that something is not a constituent is correct if the fact that it is non-celestial a constituent is false. sent16: the obsessive is a constituent if the propylene blisters but it is not Danish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the propylene is cybernetics.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the propylene is both a blister and not Danish.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the obsessive is a kind of a constituent.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the caprifig is a constituent but it is not celestial.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the waterway is a kind of a rich that is not cybernetics.
sent15 -> int4: if that the waterway is non-celestial thing that is a kind of a constituent does not hold then it is not a kind of a constituent.;
$hypothesis$ = that the caprifig is a constituent and not celestial if the propylene is cybernetics is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the propylene is celestial the caprifig is a constituent but it is not a blister. sent2: if the propylene is cybernetics then the caprifig is not celestial. sent3: the caprifig is not celestial. sent4: the obsessive is cybernetics but not a Danish if it is a constituent. sent5: the propylene is a kind of a blister that is not a constituent if the caprifig is celestial. sent6: if the obsessive is a constituent then the caprifig is not celestial. sent7: the caprifig is cybernetics thing that is not a kind of a constituent if the propylene does blister. sent8: if the waterway does blast then that it is not celestial and it is a constituent is not right. sent9: that the obsessive is a constituent is true if the propylene blisters and it is a Danish. sent10: the caprifig is a constituent but it is not celestial if the obsessive is a constituent. sent11: if the obsessive is celestial then the caprifig is celestial but it is not a constituent. sent12: the caprifig is a constituent that is not cybernetics if that the obsessive is a kind of a Danish hold. sent13: if the propylene is cybernetics it blisters and it is non-Danish. sent14: if the propylene is cybernetics then it is not a kind of a Danish. sent15: that something is not a constituent is correct if the fact that it is non-celestial a constituent is false. sent16: the obsessive is a constituent if the propylene blisters but it is not Danish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the propylene is cybernetics.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the propylene is both a blister and not Danish.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the obsessive is a kind of a constituent.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the caprifig is a constituent but it is not celestial.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__