the glyph does not decorate ablative.
sent1: if the laptop does decorate ablative it is endogenic. sent2: the laptop does pan physiography and is endogenic. sent3: the laptop is not perpendicular if something that does not vex Gorki crafts. sent4: if the laptop is not a perpendicular but it pans physiography the glyph is seraphic. sent5: if something that does not decorate ablative is endogenic the fact that the laptop does not pan physiography is right. sent6: something that is seraphic does decorate ablative. sent7: something does not vex Gorki but it is a kind of a craft. sent8: that the laptop does belay and is a craft is true.
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the laptop is not a kind of a perpendicular.; sent2 -> int2: the laptop does pan physiography.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the laptop is not a perpendicular but it pans physiography.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the glyph is seraphic.; sent6 -> int5: if the glyph is not non-seraphic then it does decorate ablative.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the glyph does not decorate ablative. ; $context$ = sent1: if the laptop does decorate ablative it is endogenic. sent2: the laptop does pan physiography and is endogenic. sent3: the laptop is not perpendicular if something that does not vex Gorki crafts. sent4: if the laptop is not a perpendicular but it pans physiography the glyph is seraphic. sent5: if something that does not decorate ablative is endogenic the fact that the laptop does not pan physiography is right. sent6: something that is seraphic does decorate ablative. sent7: something does not vex Gorki but it is a kind of a craft. sent8: that the laptop does belay and is a craft is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the laptop is not a kind of a perpendicular.; sent2 -> int2: the laptop does pan physiography.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the laptop is not a perpendicular but it pans physiography.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the glyph is seraphic.; sent6 -> int5: if the glyph is not non-seraphic then it does decorate ablative.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__