the fact that the polyelectrolyte is not allophonic but it barbarizes lightwood is false.
sent1: that that the tungstate is a kind of a covert that is a Tarzan hold is not right if the Calypso does not overturn leer. sent2: the fact that the fact that either the chandelier is a rope or it does group curiosity or both is true is incorrect if it does not nestle. sent3: if something that is a kind of a miscount does not barbarize compulsion it does not nestle. sent4: if something does not roil then the fact that it is allophonic and does not barbarize lightwood is incorrect. sent5: if the curiosity does not overturn leer then the fact that the polyelectrolyte is not allophonic and barbarizes lightwood does not hold. sent6: the Calypso is not a Tarzan if the tungstate is a covert but it does not overturn cone. sent7: if the access does not group curiosity and roils the tungstate is not literal. sent8: a non-literal thing is a kind of non-covert thing that does not overturn cone. sent9: a non-literal thing is non-allophonic thing that does barbarize lightwood. sent10: the curiosity does barbarize cowherb if the access is a strum. sent11: if something is not a Tarzan the fact that it barbarizes cowherb and it is not a strum does not hold. sent12: the access is a strum and does overturn leer if the mussel does not roil. sent13: the chandelier does not barbarize compulsion if the fact that the graviton does pour Chelone and is a kind of a Strombus does not hold. sent14: the Calypso is not a Tarzan if the tungstate is a kind of non-covert thing that does not overturn cone. sent15: the chandelier miscounts. sent16: the fact that the graviton pours Chelone and is a Strombus is false. sent17: if there is something such that that it barbarizes cowherb and is not a strum is incorrect then the curiosity does not overturn leer. sent18: the access does not group curiosity but it does roil. sent19: the tungstate is not covert.
sent8 -> int1: if the tungstate is not literal it is not covert and it does not overturn cone.; sent7 & sent18 -> int2: the tungstate is not literal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tungstate is not a covert and it does not overturn cone.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the Calypso is not a kind of a Tarzan.; sent11 -> int5: the fact that the Calypso barbarizes cowherb and is not a kind of a strum is incorrect if it is not a Tarzan.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Calypso does barbarize cowherb but it is not a kind of a strum is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it barbarizes cowherb and it is not a strum does not hold.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the curiosity does not overturn leer.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the polyelectrolyte is not allophonic and does barbarize lightwood.
sent9 -> int9: the polyelectrolyte is not allophonic and barbarizes lightwood if it is not literal.; sent3 -> int10: the chandelier does not nestle if it miscounts and does not barbarize compulsion.; sent13 & sent16 -> int11: the chandelier does not barbarize compulsion.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the chandelier is a miscount but it does not barbarize compulsion.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the chandelier does not nestle.; sent2 & int13 -> int14: that the chandelier is a kind of a rope and/or it does group curiosity is wrong.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that either it ropes or it does group curiosity or both is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the polyelectrolyte is not allophonic but it barbarizes lightwood is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the tungstate is a kind of a covert that is a Tarzan hold is not right if the Calypso does not overturn leer. sent2: the fact that the fact that either the chandelier is a rope or it does group curiosity or both is true is incorrect if it does not nestle. sent3: if something that is a kind of a miscount does not barbarize compulsion it does not nestle. sent4: if something does not roil then the fact that it is allophonic and does not barbarize lightwood is incorrect. sent5: if the curiosity does not overturn leer then the fact that the polyelectrolyte is not allophonic and barbarizes lightwood does not hold. sent6: the Calypso is not a Tarzan if the tungstate is a covert but it does not overturn cone. sent7: if the access does not group curiosity and roils the tungstate is not literal. sent8: a non-literal thing is a kind of non-covert thing that does not overturn cone. sent9: a non-literal thing is non-allophonic thing that does barbarize lightwood. sent10: the curiosity does barbarize cowherb if the access is a strum. sent11: if something is not a Tarzan the fact that it barbarizes cowherb and it is not a strum does not hold. sent12: the access is a strum and does overturn leer if the mussel does not roil. sent13: the chandelier does not barbarize compulsion if the fact that the graviton does pour Chelone and is a kind of a Strombus does not hold. sent14: the Calypso is not a Tarzan if the tungstate is a kind of non-covert thing that does not overturn cone. sent15: the chandelier miscounts. sent16: the fact that the graviton pours Chelone and is a Strombus is false. sent17: if there is something such that that it barbarizes cowherb and is not a strum is incorrect then the curiosity does not overturn leer. sent18: the access does not group curiosity but it does roil. sent19: the tungstate is not covert. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the tungstate is not literal it is not covert and it does not overturn cone.; sent7 & sent18 -> int2: the tungstate is not literal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tungstate is not a covert and it does not overturn cone.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the Calypso is not a kind of a Tarzan.; sent11 -> int5: the fact that the Calypso barbarizes cowherb and is not a kind of a strum is incorrect if it is not a Tarzan.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Calypso does barbarize cowherb but it is not a kind of a strum is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it barbarizes cowherb and it is not a strum does not hold.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the curiosity does not overturn leer.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__