the celecoxib is non-biogenetic thing that is a kind of a Mill.
sent1: something that is a Apostle themes tapotement. sent2: the saltpan knits hawser but it is not unnoticeable if it does not coat clinid. sent3: the browallia knits hawser but it is not periodontics. sent4: the hawser is not abbatial. sent5: if the saltpan is biogenetic then that the celecoxib is biogenetic and it is a kind of a Mill is not true. sent6: if the celecoxib is a Mill then it knits hawser. sent7: there are non-unnoticeable things. sent8: if the celecoxib is biogenetic then that it is unnoticeable hold. sent9: something is biogenetic if it coats clinid. sent10: that the hawser is not husbandly is correct. sent11: if the saltpan is biogenetic then that the celecoxib is not biogenetic but it is a kind of a Mill does not hold. sent12: the fact that the celecoxib is not a kind of a brewery but it is nascent is incorrect. sent13: the hawser is not a Dromaeosauridae but it is biogenetic. sent14: the hawser is both unnoticeable and not diabatic if it does not coat clinid. sent15: the fact that the celecoxib is biogenetic and it is a Mill does not hold. sent16: that the celecoxib is both non-unnoticeable and biogenetic is incorrect. sent17: the saltpan knits hawser. sent18: if there is something such that it knits hawser and is not unnoticeable the hawser does not theme invalid. sent19: there exists nothing that is both non-husbandly and diabatic. sent20: the saltpan knits hawser if it does not coat clinid. sent21: there is something such that it knits hawser. sent22: the fact that the hawser is not a kind of a Mill but it themes invalid is wrong. sent23: that the celecoxib is non-biogenetic and diabatic is wrong if the hawser is non-biogenetic. sent24: if the hawser does not theme invalid it is non-husbandly. sent25: something is not husbandly if it does not theme invalid. sent26: if something does not theme invalid it is not husbandly and it is diabatic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saltpan does not coat clinid.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the saltpan does knit hawser and is not unnoticeable.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it knits hawser and is not unnoticeable.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the hawser does not theme invalid.; sent26 -> int4: if the hawser does not theme invalid it is not husbandly and is diabatic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hawser is not husbandly but it is diabatic.; sent19 -> int6: that the hawser is non-husbandly but not non-diabatic is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the saltpan coats clinid.; sent9 -> int9: if the saltpan does coat clinid then it is biogenetic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the saltpan is biogenetic.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the celecoxib is non-biogenetic thing that is a kind of a Mill. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is a Apostle themes tapotement. sent2: the saltpan knits hawser but it is not unnoticeable if it does not coat clinid. sent3: the browallia knits hawser but it is not periodontics. sent4: the hawser is not abbatial. sent5: if the saltpan is biogenetic then that the celecoxib is biogenetic and it is a kind of a Mill is not true. sent6: if the celecoxib is a Mill then it knits hawser. sent7: there are non-unnoticeable things. sent8: if the celecoxib is biogenetic then that it is unnoticeable hold. sent9: something is biogenetic if it coats clinid. sent10: that the hawser is not husbandly is correct. sent11: if the saltpan is biogenetic then that the celecoxib is not biogenetic but it is a kind of a Mill does not hold. sent12: the fact that the celecoxib is not a kind of a brewery but it is nascent is incorrect. sent13: the hawser is not a Dromaeosauridae but it is biogenetic. sent14: the hawser is both unnoticeable and not diabatic if it does not coat clinid. sent15: the fact that the celecoxib is biogenetic and it is a Mill does not hold. sent16: that the celecoxib is both non-unnoticeable and biogenetic is incorrect. sent17: the saltpan knits hawser. sent18: if there is something such that it knits hawser and is not unnoticeable the hawser does not theme invalid. sent19: there exists nothing that is both non-husbandly and diabatic. sent20: the saltpan knits hawser if it does not coat clinid. sent21: there is something such that it knits hawser. sent22: the fact that the hawser is not a kind of a Mill but it themes invalid is wrong. sent23: that the celecoxib is non-biogenetic and diabatic is wrong if the hawser is non-biogenetic. sent24: if the hawser does not theme invalid it is non-husbandly. sent25: something is not husbandly if it does not theme invalid. sent26: if something does not theme invalid it is not husbandly and it is diabatic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saltpan does not coat clinid.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the saltpan does knit hawser and is not unnoticeable.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it knits hawser and is not unnoticeable.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the hawser does not theme invalid.; sent26 -> int4: if the hawser does not theme invalid it is not husbandly and is diabatic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hawser is not husbandly but it is diabatic.; sent19 -> int6: that the hawser is non-husbandly but not non-diabatic is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the saltpan coats clinid.; sent9 -> int9: if the saltpan does coat clinid then it is biogenetic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the saltpan is biogenetic.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__