the chambermaid does cancel harbor.
sent1: if the burin does not cancel revelation then the chambermaid does not cancel harbor. sent2: the bola is not lively if there exists something such that the fact that it is not non-joyful and it is a rusted is not true. sent3: there is nothing that is joyful and is a rusted. sent4: something is not neurogenic if it is not lively. sent5: the chambermaid does cancel harbor if the burin does not cancel revelation. sent6: if the fact that something is not non-lively and it is neurogenic is incorrect then it is non-theocratic. sent7: if the bola is not neurogenic the burin is not theocratic or it does not cancel revelation or both. sent8: if the burin is not theocratic then the chambermaid does not cancel harbor.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the paleencephalon is joyful and it is a rusted does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not non-joyful but a rusted does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the bola is not lively.; sent4 -> int4: if the bola is not lively it is non-neurogenic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bola is not neurogenic.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the burin is not theocratic and/or does not cancel revelation.; int6 & sent8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the chambermaid is not theocratic.
sent6 -> int7: the chambermaid is not theocratic if that it is lively and it is neurogenic is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the chambermaid does cancel harbor. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burin does not cancel revelation then the chambermaid does not cancel harbor. sent2: the bola is not lively if there exists something such that the fact that it is not non-joyful and it is a rusted is not true. sent3: there is nothing that is joyful and is a rusted. sent4: something is not neurogenic if it is not lively. sent5: the chambermaid does cancel harbor if the burin does not cancel revelation. sent6: if the fact that something is not non-lively and it is neurogenic is incorrect then it is non-theocratic. sent7: if the bola is not neurogenic the burin is not theocratic or it does not cancel revelation or both. sent8: if the burin is not theocratic then the chambermaid does not cancel harbor. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the paleencephalon is joyful and it is a rusted does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not non-joyful but a rusted does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the bola is not lively.; sent4 -> int4: if the bola is not lively it is non-neurogenic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bola is not neurogenic.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the burin is not theocratic and/or does not cancel revelation.; int6 & sent8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__