the PR Frenches MANPAD.
sent1: the MANPAD Frenches indecency. sent2: the fact that the MANPAD is not a kind of a correlate and it is not a pattern is not right. sent3: the MANPAD does not French indecency if it is a kind of a clientage that does snick PR. sent4: the fact that the PR is Alpine and does not French tremolite is false. sent5: the MANPAD does French MANPAD if the fact that the PR does not French MANPAD is true. sent6: The indecency Frenches MANPAD. sent7: if the MANPAD does not French MANPAD but it snicks PR the PR does not French MANPAD. sent8: if that the MANPAD is both not a correlate and not a pattern is not true then it is a clientage. sent9: the PR does French MANPAD if the fact that the scalpel is implacable is not false. sent10: the fact that the MANPAD is a correlate but not a pattern is not true. sent11: the scalpel is a kind of a correlate if the MANPAD does not correlate. sent12: the fact that the MANPAD does pattern and is not a kind of a witloof is not right. sent13: the scalpel snicks PR and is implacable if the MANPAD does not snicks PR. sent14: if the MANPAD does not French indecency then the scalpel French indecency.
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the MANPAD is a clientage.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the MANPAD snicks PR.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the MANPAD is a clientage and snicks PR.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the MANPAD does not French indecency.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the MANPAD does not snick PR.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the scalpel snicks PR and it is implacable.; int6 -> int7: the scalpel is implacable.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the PR does not French MANPAD.
$hypothesis$ = the PR Frenches MANPAD. ; $context$ = sent1: the MANPAD Frenches indecency. sent2: the fact that the MANPAD is not a kind of a correlate and it is not a pattern is not right. sent3: the MANPAD does not French indecency if it is a kind of a clientage that does snick PR. sent4: the fact that the PR is Alpine and does not French tremolite is false. sent5: the MANPAD does French MANPAD if the fact that the PR does not French MANPAD is true. sent6: The indecency Frenches MANPAD. sent7: if the MANPAD does not French MANPAD but it snicks PR the PR does not French MANPAD. sent8: if that the MANPAD is both not a correlate and not a pattern is not true then it is a clientage. sent9: the PR does French MANPAD if the fact that the scalpel is implacable is not false. sent10: the fact that the MANPAD is a correlate but not a pattern is not true. sent11: the scalpel is a kind of a correlate if the MANPAD does not correlate. sent12: the fact that the MANPAD does pattern and is not a kind of a witloof is not right. sent13: the scalpel snicks PR and is implacable if the MANPAD does not snicks PR. sent14: if the MANPAD does not French indecency then the scalpel French indecency. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the MANPAD is a clientage.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the MANPAD snicks PR.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the MANPAD is a clientage and snicks PR.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the MANPAD does not French indecency.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the MANPAD does not snick PR.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the scalpel snicks PR and it is implacable.; int6 -> int7: the scalpel is implacable.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__