that the CPR happens is caused by that the purposelessness happens.
sent1: that the arriving Lander does not occur and the Jovianness does not occur yields that the interposing doxepin does not occur. sent2: the Thainess does not occur. sent3: if the exculpatoriness occurs the arriving Lander does not occur and the Jovianness does not occur. sent4: not the chastity but the splenectomy happens if the spoilage happens. sent5: that the Thai does not occur yields that the sibilation happens and the spoilage occurs. sent6: if the arborolatry does not occur that the CPR does not occur is not correct. sent7: that both the arborolatry and the non-purposelessness occurs is not right if the fact that the disruption occurs hold. sent8: the disruption happens if the campanulateness occurs. sent9: the non-metropolitanness brings about that the Calcuttanness happens and the impeaching occurs. sent10: if the fact that the chastity does not occur is correct either the occupationalness happens or the campanulateness happens or both. sent11: the non-purposelessness is caused by that the metropolitanness and the arborolatry occurs. sent12: the curbing palsied and the CPR happens if the interposing doxepin does not occur. sent13: the washing-up happens and the exculpatoriness happens if the constriction does not occur. sent14: the disruption happens if that the occupationalness occurs is not incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the purposelessness occurs.;
the Calcuttanness happens and the curbing palsied occurs.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the sibilation happens and the spoilage happens.; int1 -> int2: the spoilage happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: not the chastity but the splenectomy happens.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the chastity does not occur is not wrong.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the occupationalness happens and/or the campanulateness happens is not incorrect.; int5 & sent14 & sent8 -> int6: the disruption happens.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the arborolatry happens but the purposelessness does not occur does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the CPR happens is caused by that the purposelessness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the arriving Lander does not occur and the Jovianness does not occur yields that the interposing doxepin does not occur. sent2: the Thainess does not occur. sent3: if the exculpatoriness occurs the arriving Lander does not occur and the Jovianness does not occur. sent4: not the chastity but the splenectomy happens if the spoilage happens. sent5: that the Thai does not occur yields that the sibilation happens and the spoilage occurs. sent6: if the arborolatry does not occur that the CPR does not occur is not correct. sent7: that both the arborolatry and the non-purposelessness occurs is not right if the fact that the disruption occurs hold. sent8: the disruption happens if the campanulateness occurs. sent9: the non-metropolitanness brings about that the Calcuttanness happens and the impeaching occurs. sent10: if the fact that the chastity does not occur is correct either the occupationalness happens or the campanulateness happens or both. sent11: the non-purposelessness is caused by that the metropolitanness and the arborolatry occurs. sent12: the curbing palsied and the CPR happens if the interposing doxepin does not occur. sent13: the washing-up happens and the exculpatoriness happens if the constriction does not occur. sent14: the disruption happens if that the occupationalness occurs is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the purposelessness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__