the fact that there exists something such that if that it is limbless and is not a kind of a sights is not right that it does not frolic ponderousness is not false is incorrect.
sent1: the verticillium does frolic ponderousness if that it is limbless and it is not a sights does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if that it is compatible but not a Stalin is not true it is not campanulate. sent3: if that the verticillium is limbless but it does not sight is false it does not frolic ponderousness. sent4: if the fact that the bowls officializes para but it does not frolic ponderousness does not hold it is not archducal. sent5: there is something such that if it is repulsive it is not a graphics. sent6: the verticillium does not frolic ponderousness if that it is both limbless and a sights is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a ammonification and it is not archducal does not hold it does not reseed. sent8: if that the verticillium is not limbless is right then it does not frolic ponderousness. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is a vulture and it is not apiarian is not right then it realigns bargain. sent10: there is something such that if that it is limbless and it does sight is false it does not frolic ponderousness. sent11: if that something is both not non-vocalic and not happy is false that it is not a wisp is correct. sent12: if the verticillium is limbless and not a sights then it does not frolic ponderousness.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the verticillium is not a wisp is true if the fact that the fact that it is vocalic and it is not happy is right is not right.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it is limbless and is not a kind of a sights is not right that it does not frolic ponderousness is not false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the verticillium does frolic ponderousness if that it is limbless and it is not a sights does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if that it is compatible but not a Stalin is not true it is not campanulate. sent3: if that the verticillium is limbless but it does not sight is false it does not frolic ponderousness. sent4: if the fact that the bowls officializes para but it does not frolic ponderousness does not hold it is not archducal. sent5: there is something such that if it is repulsive it is not a graphics. sent6: the verticillium does not frolic ponderousness if that it is both limbless and a sights is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a ammonification and it is not archducal does not hold it does not reseed. sent8: if that the verticillium is not limbless is right then it does not frolic ponderousness. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is a vulture and it is not apiarian is not right then it realigns bargain. sent10: there is something such that if that it is limbless and it does sight is false it does not frolic ponderousness. sent11: if that something is both not non-vocalic and not happy is false that it is not a wisp is correct. sent12: if the verticillium is limbless and not a sights then it does not frolic ponderousness. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__