there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-rabbinical thing that does quench glamorization is not right.
sent1: the fact that the fluid does shush if there exists something such that the fact that it does not shush and is not inaugural is not right hold. sent2: there exists something such that that it does not shush and is not an inaugural does not hold. sent3: the semen does not scrimp. sent4: the fact that the Ojibwa does sympathize and it quenches glamorization does not hold if it is not a Savara. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it does not shush and is an inaugural is incorrect. sent6: the Ojibwa is not ribless if the fluid is undemocratic thing that shushes. sent7: the fact that the fact that the Ojibwa is a kind of rabbinical thing that does quench glamorization does not hold is not false if it is not ribless. sent8: something does not shush and is not an inaugural. sent9: if something is not ribless then the fact that it is not rabbinical and it does quench glamorization is not true. sent10: the fluid sympathizes and/or is not a Savara. sent11: the fluid is undemocratic if it does sympathize or it is not a Savara or both. sent12: the Ojibwa is rabbinical or it is a Savara or both. sent13: there is something such that it is not rabbinical and it does quench glamorization. sent14: the fluid is ribless if the Ojibwa does not quench glamorization and it is not rabbinical.
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the fluid is undemocratic.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the fluid does shush.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fluid is undemocratic and does shush.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the Ojibwa is not ribless.; sent9 -> int5: the fact that that the Ojibwa is non-rabbinical thing that does quench glamorization hold is incorrect if it is not ribless.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the Ojibwa is a kind of non-rabbinical thing that does quench glamorization is incorrect.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bale is not an operation but it is undemocratic is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-rabbinical thing that does quench glamorization is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fluid does shush if there exists something such that the fact that it does not shush and is not inaugural is not right hold. sent2: there exists something such that that it does not shush and is not an inaugural does not hold. sent3: the semen does not scrimp. sent4: the fact that the Ojibwa does sympathize and it quenches glamorization does not hold if it is not a Savara. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it does not shush and is an inaugural is incorrect. sent6: the Ojibwa is not ribless if the fluid is undemocratic thing that shushes. sent7: the fact that the fact that the Ojibwa is a kind of rabbinical thing that does quench glamorization does not hold is not false if it is not ribless. sent8: something does not shush and is not an inaugural. sent9: if something is not ribless then the fact that it is not rabbinical and it does quench glamorization is not true. sent10: the fluid sympathizes and/or is not a Savara. sent11: the fluid is undemocratic if it does sympathize or it is not a Savara or both. sent12: the Ojibwa is rabbinical or it is a Savara or both. sent13: there is something such that it is not rabbinical and it does quench glamorization. sent14: the fluid is ribless if the Ojibwa does not quench glamorization and it is not rabbinical. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the fluid is undemocratic.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the fluid does shush.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fluid is undemocratic and does shush.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the Ojibwa is not ribless.; sent9 -> int5: the fact that that the Ojibwa is non-rabbinical thing that does quench glamorization hold is incorrect if it is not ribless.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the Ojibwa is a kind of non-rabbinical thing that does quench glamorization is incorrect.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__