the fruiterer is not curly.
sent1: the homestead is not a RICO if there is something such that it is curly thing that is not metamorphic. sent2: the fruiterer is not uncontroversial. sent3: something is a Adrian. sent4: there exists something such that it is curly. sent5: the homestead is damascene. sent6: everything is not non-damascene. sent7: the fact that the towline is not a misfeasance but it is celebratory is incorrect. sent8: the fact that everything is damascene thing that is a kind of a RICO hold. sent9: if there is something such that it does cloister Merrimack then the fact that the towline is not a kind of a misfeasance and is celebratory is not right. sent10: there are curly and metamorphic things. sent11: if the fact that something is celebratory and is metamorphic is incorrect then the fact that it is not a misfeasance is not incorrect. sent12: that if that the towline does cloister Merrimack is not false then the fruiterer is curly hold. sent13: the towline is a kind of a RICO if it does not damascene. sent14: that the homestead is a kind of a misfeasance but it is not celebratory is incorrect if the mint is metamorphic. sent15: if something does cloister Merrimack then the fact that the towline is a misfeasance but it is not celebratory is not correct. sent16: the fruiterer is not a kind of a misfeasance. sent17: if the mint is curly then it is metamorphic. sent18: there exists something such that it does sermonize suitability and is not dicarboxylic. sent19: that the towline is a misfeasance and not celebratory is not right. sent20: there is something such that it cloisters Merrimack. sent21: there exists something such that it is not metamorphic. sent22: the fact that the fact that the fruiterer is not metamorphic is not wrong if the fact that the towline is not a kind of a misfeasance and it is not celebratory is wrong hold. sent23: something is curly if it does cloister Merrimack.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fruiterer is curly.; sent8 -> int1: the homestead is not non-damascene and it is a kind of a RICO.; int1 -> int2: the homestead is a kind of a RICO.;
the fruiterer is curly.
sent23 -> int3: that the fruiterer is curly is not wrong if it does cloister Merrimack.; sent11 -> int4: if that the fruiterer is both celebratory and metamorphic is not right it is not a misfeasance.;
$hypothesis$ = the fruiterer is not curly. ; $context$ = sent1: the homestead is not a RICO if there is something such that it is curly thing that is not metamorphic. sent2: the fruiterer is not uncontroversial. sent3: something is a Adrian. sent4: there exists something such that it is curly. sent5: the homestead is damascene. sent6: everything is not non-damascene. sent7: the fact that the towline is not a misfeasance but it is celebratory is incorrect. sent8: the fact that everything is damascene thing that is a kind of a RICO hold. sent9: if there is something such that it does cloister Merrimack then the fact that the towline is not a kind of a misfeasance and is celebratory is not right. sent10: there are curly and metamorphic things. sent11: if the fact that something is celebratory and is metamorphic is incorrect then the fact that it is not a misfeasance is not incorrect. sent12: that if that the towline does cloister Merrimack is not false then the fruiterer is curly hold. sent13: the towline is a kind of a RICO if it does not damascene. sent14: that the homestead is a kind of a misfeasance but it is not celebratory is incorrect if the mint is metamorphic. sent15: if something does cloister Merrimack then the fact that the towline is a misfeasance but it is not celebratory is not correct. sent16: the fruiterer is not a kind of a misfeasance. sent17: if the mint is curly then it is metamorphic. sent18: there exists something such that it does sermonize suitability and is not dicarboxylic. sent19: that the towline is a misfeasance and not celebratory is not right. sent20: there is something such that it cloisters Merrimack. sent21: there exists something such that it is not metamorphic. sent22: the fact that the fact that the fruiterer is not metamorphic is not wrong if the fact that the towline is not a kind of a misfeasance and it is not celebratory is wrong hold. sent23: something is curly if it does cloister Merrimack. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fruiterer is curly.; sent8 -> int1: the homestead is not non-damascene and it is a kind of a RICO.; int1 -> int2: the homestead is a kind of a RICO.; __UNKNOWN__