that the caseating does not occur triggers that the grassfire does not occur and/or that the anthropometry does not occur.
sent1: the jockeying advance does not occur. sent2: that the caseating happens is caused by that the scallop occurs. sent3: the airlift happens and/or the consorting Stendhal does not occur. sent4: if the adhesion does not occur then the consorting cuckoopint occurs or the consorting sheared does not occur or both. sent5: the non-evergreenness or the header or both happens. sent6: the caseating triggers that the grassfire does not occur and/or the anthropometry does not occur. sent7: the proverbialness does not occur. sent8: if the scallop does not occur the anthropometry does not occur but the bastardization occurs. sent9: if the caseating does not occur then either the grassfire happens or the anthropometry does not occur or both. sent10: the praetorianness does not occur or the one-hitter does not occur or both if the mining does not occur. sent11: the anthropometry happens. sent12: the bastardization happens. sent13: if the fact that the caseating does not occur hold then either the grassfire does not occur or the anthropometry happens or both. sent14: the fact that the clanking Netherlander does not occur and/or the phagocyticness does not occur is not false. sent15: the underpayment does not occur. sent16: both the anthropometry and the bastardization occurs. sent17: the consorting shears happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scallop happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the caseating happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the caseating does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the scallop does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the anthropometry does not occur but the bastardization occurs.; int4 -> int5: the anthropometry does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the grassfire does not occur and/or the anthropometry does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the caseating does not occur triggers that the grassfire does not occur and/or that the anthropometry does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the jockeying advance does not occur. sent2: that the caseating happens is caused by that the scallop occurs. sent3: the airlift happens and/or the consorting Stendhal does not occur. sent4: if the adhesion does not occur then the consorting cuckoopint occurs or the consorting sheared does not occur or both. sent5: the non-evergreenness or the header or both happens. sent6: the caseating triggers that the grassfire does not occur and/or the anthropometry does not occur. sent7: the proverbialness does not occur. sent8: if the scallop does not occur the anthropometry does not occur but the bastardization occurs. sent9: if the caseating does not occur then either the grassfire happens or the anthropometry does not occur or both. sent10: the praetorianness does not occur or the one-hitter does not occur or both if the mining does not occur. sent11: the anthropometry happens. sent12: the bastardization happens. sent13: if the fact that the caseating does not occur hold then either the grassfire does not occur or the anthropometry happens or both. sent14: the fact that the clanking Netherlander does not occur and/or the phagocyticness does not occur is not false. sent15: the underpayment does not occur. sent16: both the anthropometry and the bastardization occurs. sent17: the consorting shears happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scallop happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the caseating happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the caseating does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the scallop does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the anthropometry does not occur but the bastardization occurs.; int4 -> int5: the anthropometry does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the grassfire does not occur and/or the anthropometry does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__