that the isosorbide clouds squatter but it is not a perjurer is false.
sent1: there is something such that it is not a refreshment. sent2: if there is something such that it does not cloud squatter and is a perjurer then the isosorbide clouds Nan. sent3: that the squatter is not esophageal but it buys is not true. sent4: the photomicrograph is a perjurer. sent5: if something that is not a refreshment does cloud Nan then the isosorbide is a length. sent6: the fact that the feedback does not buy and does not cloud parachute is not true. sent7: the fact that the squatter does not wobble xylene and it does not overboil is incorrect. sent8: that the squatter does not wobble qualification and does not ferret feedback is not correct. sent9: something does not buy but it is a perjurer. sent10: the squatter is not a refreshment if it buys. sent11: there is something such that that it does cloud Nan is not wrong. sent12: the fact that the isosorbide does not buy and is not a length is not correct. sent13: the isosorbide is not a perjurer. sent14: the fact that the squatter clouds Nan is true if it wobbles qualification. sent15: if something is a length it does cloud squatter and is not a perjurer. sent16: if that the isosorbide is a kind of a length is right then it is not a perjurer. sent17: the squatter wobbles carpetbag. sent18: there exists something such that it is a refreshment and clouds Nan. sent19: there is something such that it does not cloud squatter and it is esophageal. sent20: the isosorbide does not cloud Nan. sent21: if the fact that the isosorbide is a length hold then it is a refreshment. sent22: the squatter does wobble qualification. sent23: The qualification does wobble squatter. sent24: the fact that if that the squatter is not esophageal and it does not buy does not hold the squatter is not a refreshment is not false. sent25: if something is a kind of a length then the fact that it is not a perjurer is not incorrect. sent26: the isosorbide is esophageal. sent27: that the squatter is not esophageal and it does not buy is incorrect.
sent14 & sent22 -> int1: the squatter clouds Nan.; sent24 & sent27 -> int2: the squatter is not a kind of a refreshment.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the squatter is not a kind of a refreshment and clouds Nan.; int3 -> int4: something is not a refreshment but it clouds Nan.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the isosorbide is a length.; sent15 -> int6: the isosorbide clouds squatter and is not a perjurer if it is a length.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the isosorbide clouds squatter but it is not a perjurer is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not a refreshment. sent2: if there is something such that it does not cloud squatter and is a perjurer then the isosorbide clouds Nan. sent3: that the squatter is not esophageal but it buys is not true. sent4: the photomicrograph is a perjurer. sent5: if something that is not a refreshment does cloud Nan then the isosorbide is a length. sent6: the fact that the feedback does not buy and does not cloud parachute is not true. sent7: the fact that the squatter does not wobble xylene and it does not overboil is incorrect. sent8: that the squatter does not wobble qualification and does not ferret feedback is not correct. sent9: something does not buy but it is a perjurer. sent10: the squatter is not a refreshment if it buys. sent11: there is something such that that it does cloud Nan is not wrong. sent12: the fact that the isosorbide does not buy and is not a length is not correct. sent13: the isosorbide is not a perjurer. sent14: the fact that the squatter clouds Nan is true if it wobbles qualification. sent15: if something is a length it does cloud squatter and is not a perjurer. sent16: if that the isosorbide is a kind of a length is right then it is not a perjurer. sent17: the squatter wobbles carpetbag. sent18: there exists something such that it is a refreshment and clouds Nan. sent19: there is something such that it does not cloud squatter and it is esophageal. sent20: the isosorbide does not cloud Nan. sent21: if the fact that the isosorbide is a length hold then it is a refreshment. sent22: the squatter does wobble qualification. sent23: The qualification does wobble squatter. sent24: the fact that if that the squatter is not esophageal and it does not buy does not hold the squatter is not a refreshment is not false. sent25: if something is a kind of a length then the fact that it is not a perjurer is not incorrect. sent26: the isosorbide is esophageal. sent27: that the squatter is not esophageal and it does not buy is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent22 -> int1: the squatter clouds Nan.; sent24 & sent27 -> int2: the squatter is not a kind of a refreshment.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the squatter is not a kind of a refreshment and clouds Nan.; int3 -> int4: something is not a refreshment but it clouds Nan.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the isosorbide is a length.; sent15 -> int6: the isosorbide clouds squatter and is not a perjurer if it is a length.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__