the triiodothyronine is rimless and it nips.
sent1: the fact that the louvar is not a kind of a flyweight and it is not a kind of a cyan is not correct. sent2: the triiodothyronine is a contingency if something is a cyan. sent3: if the fact that the curandero does not emend Winnebago and is a hyalinization is false the dissolution is a hyalinization. sent4: the pawn lives. sent5: something is pyrolytic if that it is a kind of a hyalinization hold. sent6: if something is not mutable that that the safety does emend ageratum but it is not a synthetism is false is not wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it does emend ageratum and it is not a synthetism is wrong the curandero does not emend ageratum. sent8: the mechanism is not mutable if the tamer does live. sent9: if something does not emend ageratum then that it does not emend Winnebago and it is a hyalinization is false. sent10: the tamer lives if the pawn is lives. sent11: if that that something is both a contingency and not a blogger hold is not true it is not a contingency. sent12: the triiodothyronine is rimless if it is a kind of a contingency. sent13: the fact that the cornbread is a contingency but it is not a blogger is not right if there is something such that it does not emend Nigerian. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a flyweight and it is not a cyan is false the triiodothyronine is a kind of a contingency. sent15: there is something such that that it is not a flyweight and does not emend Nigerian is not right. sent16: the louvar is a nip. sent17: the dissolution does not emend Nigerian if it is pyrolytic. sent18: the fact that the louvar is not a kind of a flyweight but it is a cyan does not hold. sent19: the triiodothyronine is a nip and it emends Nigerian.
sent1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a flyweight and it is not a cyan does not hold.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the triiodothyronine is a contingency.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the triiodothyronine is rimless.; sent19 -> int4: the triiodothyronine does nip.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the triiodothyronine is both rimless and a nip does not hold.
sent11 -> int5: the cornbread is not a contingency if the fact that it is a contingency that is not a blogger is incorrect.; sent5 -> int6: the dissolution is pyrolytic if it is a hyalinization.; sent9 -> int7: the fact that the curandero does not emend Winnebago but it is a hyalinization is not right if it does not emend ageratum.; sent10 & sent4 -> int8: the tamer does live.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the mechanism is not mutable.; int9 -> int10: there are non-mutable things.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the fact that the safety emends ageratum and is not a synthetism is not true.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it emends ageratum and it is not a synthetism is not correct.; int12 & sent7 -> int13: the curandero does not emend ageratum.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the fact that that the curandero does not emend Winnebago and is a hyalinization is not incorrect is wrong.; sent3 & int14 -> int15: the dissolution is a kind of a hyalinization.; int6 & int15 -> int16: the dissolution is pyrolytic.; sent17 & int16 -> int17: the dissolution does not emend Nigerian.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it does not emend Nigerian.; int18 & sent13 -> int19: the fact that the cornbread is a contingency and is not a blogger is not true.; int5 & int19 -> int20: the cornbread is not a contingency.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that it is not a contingency.;
$hypothesis$ = the triiodothyronine is rimless and it nips. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the louvar is not a kind of a flyweight and it is not a kind of a cyan is not correct. sent2: the triiodothyronine is a contingency if something is a cyan. sent3: if the fact that the curandero does not emend Winnebago and is a hyalinization is false the dissolution is a hyalinization. sent4: the pawn lives. sent5: something is pyrolytic if that it is a kind of a hyalinization hold. sent6: if something is not mutable that that the safety does emend ageratum but it is not a synthetism is false is not wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it does emend ageratum and it is not a synthetism is wrong the curandero does not emend ageratum. sent8: the mechanism is not mutable if the tamer does live. sent9: if something does not emend ageratum then that it does not emend Winnebago and it is a hyalinization is false. sent10: the tamer lives if the pawn is lives. sent11: if that that something is both a contingency and not a blogger hold is not true it is not a contingency. sent12: the triiodothyronine is rimless if it is a kind of a contingency. sent13: the fact that the cornbread is a contingency but it is not a blogger is not right if there is something such that it does not emend Nigerian. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a flyweight and it is not a cyan is false the triiodothyronine is a kind of a contingency. sent15: there is something such that that it is not a flyweight and does not emend Nigerian is not right. sent16: the louvar is a nip. sent17: the dissolution does not emend Nigerian if it is pyrolytic. sent18: the fact that the louvar is not a kind of a flyweight but it is a cyan does not hold. sent19: the triiodothyronine is a nip and it emends Nigerian. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a flyweight and it is not a cyan does not hold.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the triiodothyronine is a contingency.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the triiodothyronine is rimless.; sent19 -> int4: the triiodothyronine does nip.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__