the eating does not occur.
sent1: that the retrieval but not the eating happens is not correct if the respecting does not occur. sent2: the launching Erysiphe is prevented by that the intensification does not occur and the collecting assertiveness occurs. sent3: the mercantileness does not occur if the fact that that not the possessiveness but the mercantileness occurs is not false does not hold. sent4: the Eucharisticness happens if that the retrieval occurs but the eating does not occur does not hold. sent5: the fact that the geneticness and the respect happens is incorrect if the brachiopodness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the keeping but not the gazing occurs is wrong if the strangulating Musaceae occurs. sent7: the respect does not occur but the geneticness occurs. sent8: the collecting forearm does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the keeping but not the gaze occurs is wrong the brachiopod does not occur. sent10: the respecting does not occur if that both the geneticness and the respecting happens is not correct. sent11: that the mistrial does not occur is not false. sent12: the retrieval happens if the eating occurs. sent13: that the mercantileness does not occur yields that the jihad but not the softening happens. sent14: if the jihad happens then the affinity but not the Laos occurs. sent15: that not the respect but the geneticness happens leads to that the retrieval does not occur. sent16: that the strangulating Musaceae occurs and the launching Kitakyushu happens is caused by that the Laosness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eating occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the retrieval happens.; sent15 & sent7 -> int2: the retrieval does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Eucharisticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the eating does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the retrieval but not the eating happens is not correct if the respecting does not occur. sent2: the launching Erysiphe is prevented by that the intensification does not occur and the collecting assertiveness occurs. sent3: the mercantileness does not occur if the fact that that not the possessiveness but the mercantileness occurs is not false does not hold. sent4: the Eucharisticness happens if that the retrieval occurs but the eating does not occur does not hold. sent5: the fact that the geneticness and the respect happens is incorrect if the brachiopodness does not occur. sent6: the fact that the keeping but not the gazing occurs is wrong if the strangulating Musaceae occurs. sent7: the respect does not occur but the geneticness occurs. sent8: the collecting forearm does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the keeping but not the gaze occurs is wrong the brachiopod does not occur. sent10: the respecting does not occur if that both the geneticness and the respecting happens is not correct. sent11: that the mistrial does not occur is not false. sent12: the retrieval happens if the eating occurs. sent13: that the mercantileness does not occur yields that the jihad but not the softening happens. sent14: if the jihad happens then the affinity but not the Laos occurs. sent15: that not the respect but the geneticness happens leads to that the retrieval does not occur. sent16: that the strangulating Musaceae occurs and the launching Kitakyushu happens is caused by that the Laosness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eating occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the retrieval happens.; sent15 & sent7 -> int2: the retrieval does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__