the copywriter is both a racon and not Caroline.
sent1: that the tostada is a Pempheridae or does not network cascabel or both is not right if it is irremediable. sent2: that the balldress is nonimitative and does not network no-goal is wrong. sent3: that the copywriter is a Pempheridae and it is Caroline is incorrect. sent4: the copywriter is irremediable but it is not a belt if the Siouan is not redemptive. sent5: if the Siouan is not Caroline the copywriter is not earthy. sent6: the tostada is not earthy. sent7: the copywriter does not network cascabel. sent8: the Siouan networks cascabel and it is a belt. sent9: the fact that the Siouan is a kind of a belt and is not earthy is not correct if that the tostada is a Pempheridae hold. sent10: the copywriter is irremediable and it does withdraw. sent11: the Siouan is not a kind of a racon. sent12: if that something is earthy or it is not a belt or both is not right then it is not a racon. sent13: the fact that the copywriter is earthy hold. sent14: the copywriter is earthy but it does not network cascabel. sent15: the Siouan is not a racon if the copywriter is not earthy. sent16: the tostada is a Pempheridae. sent17: if the fact that something withdraws and/or is not a Pempheridae does not hold it is not redemptive. sent18: the Siouan does outshout newsstand and is not a Apogonidae. sent19: the copywriter does not network cascabel if that it is a racon or it is not a belt or both is false. sent20: something is not Caroline if that it does network cascabel or it is not redemptive or both is incorrect. sent21: if that something is irremediable and/or it is not a Pempheridae is not right it is not earthy. sent22: the Siouan is Caroline. sent23: if the copywriter is not a racon then the Siouan belts but it is not earthy. sent24: the fact that the copywriter networks cascabel and/or it is not redemptive does not hold if it is irremediable. sent25: if the tostada does withdraw that it is Caroline or it is not a Pempheridae or both does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copywriter is not a racon.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: that the Siouan belts but it is not earthy is not incorrect.; sent9 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the Siouan belts and is not earthy is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the copywriter is a racon.; sent20 -> int5: if the fact that either the copywriter does network cascabel or it is not redemptive or both is not true it is not Caroline.; sent10 -> int6: the copywriter is irremediable.; sent24 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the copywriter does network cascabel and/or is not redemptive is wrong.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the copywriter is not Caroline is not incorrect.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the copywriter is both a racon and not Caroline. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tostada is a Pempheridae or does not network cascabel or both is not right if it is irremediable. sent2: that the balldress is nonimitative and does not network no-goal is wrong. sent3: that the copywriter is a Pempheridae and it is Caroline is incorrect. sent4: the copywriter is irremediable but it is not a belt if the Siouan is not redemptive. sent5: if the Siouan is not Caroline the copywriter is not earthy. sent6: the tostada is not earthy. sent7: the copywriter does not network cascabel. sent8: the Siouan networks cascabel and it is a belt. sent9: the fact that the Siouan is a kind of a belt and is not earthy is not correct if that the tostada is a Pempheridae hold. sent10: the copywriter is irremediable and it does withdraw. sent11: the Siouan is not a kind of a racon. sent12: if that something is earthy or it is not a belt or both is not right then it is not a racon. sent13: the fact that the copywriter is earthy hold. sent14: the copywriter is earthy but it does not network cascabel. sent15: the Siouan is not a racon if the copywriter is not earthy. sent16: the tostada is a Pempheridae. sent17: if the fact that something withdraws and/or is not a Pempheridae does not hold it is not redemptive. sent18: the Siouan does outshout newsstand and is not a Apogonidae. sent19: the copywriter does not network cascabel if that it is a racon or it is not a belt or both is false. sent20: something is not Caroline if that it does network cascabel or it is not redemptive or both is incorrect. sent21: if that something is irremediable and/or it is not a Pempheridae is not right it is not earthy. sent22: the Siouan is Caroline. sent23: if the copywriter is not a racon then the Siouan belts but it is not earthy. sent24: the fact that the copywriter networks cascabel and/or it is not redemptive does not hold if it is irremediable. sent25: if the tostada does withdraw that it is Caroline or it is not a Pempheridae or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copywriter is not a racon.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: that the Siouan belts but it is not earthy is not incorrect.; sent9 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the Siouan belts and is not earthy is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the copywriter is a racon.; sent20 -> int5: if the fact that either the copywriter does network cascabel or it is not redemptive or both is not true it is not Caroline.; sent10 -> int6: the copywriter is irremediable.; sent24 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the copywriter does network cascabel and/or is not redemptive is wrong.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the copywriter is not Caroline is not incorrect.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__