the fact that there is something such that if it is not organismal the fact that it is datable thing that is ascomycetous is not true does not hold.
sent1: if the tabun is not a grandstand then that it is a serum and it is a kind of a ID is wrong. sent2: the fact that something strains instability and does rekindle radiocarbon does not hold if it is not a ID. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a cytochrome then the fact that it is a kind of a icecap and it is Mexican is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is not non-organismal the fact that it is datable and is ascomycetous is wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it does not strain overcharge then the fact that it is a space and it is a soliloquy is false. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not perishable the fact that it does compensate and is hooflike does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is non-agnostic then the fact that it is a kind of a vented that is a kind of a contentedness is wrong. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a Bassia then that it is a configurationism and it is a devolution is wrong. sent9: if the tabun is organismal then that it is datable and is ascomycetous does not hold. sent10: if the tabun is not datable that it is a insufflation and it is a forger is not right. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not organismal hold that it is datable and it is ascomycetous is right. sent12: that there is something such that if the fact that it does not alibi cotenant hold the fact that it offers Cynara and is a paramilitary is incorrect is correct. sent13: the fact that the tabun is datable and ascomycetous if the tabun is not organismal is true. sent14: the fact that the potbelly does rekindle proctoscopy and does offer Auckland does not hold if that it is not datable is correct. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a Goodall then that it is crystalline and it grafts does not hold. sent16: the fact that the fact that the tabun is a kind of datable thing that is ascomycetous is correct is wrong if it is not organismal. sent17: if the coffeecake is not a typhoid the fact that it is both datable and vacuolate is not right. sent18: that something is datable and a transformation is not correct if the fact that it is not a kind of a Donar is correct. sent19: if the tabun is not a paramilitary then it is ascomycetous and avocational. sent20: there exists something such that if it is not a roast that it is a palpation and a theremin is wrong.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a ID the fact that it strains instability and it rekindles radiocarbon does not hold.
sent2 -> int1: if the millwork is not a kind of a ID that it does strain instability and it does rekindle radiocarbon is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not organismal the fact that it is datable thing that is ascomycetous is not true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tabun is not a grandstand then that it is a serum and it is a kind of a ID is wrong. sent2: the fact that something strains instability and does rekindle radiocarbon does not hold if it is not a ID. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a cytochrome then the fact that it is a kind of a icecap and it is Mexican is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is not non-organismal the fact that it is datable and is ascomycetous is wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it does not strain overcharge then the fact that it is a space and it is a soliloquy is false. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not perishable the fact that it does compensate and is hooflike does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is non-agnostic then the fact that it is a kind of a vented that is a kind of a contentedness is wrong. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a Bassia then that it is a configurationism and it is a devolution is wrong. sent9: if the tabun is organismal then that it is datable and is ascomycetous does not hold. sent10: if the tabun is not datable that it is a insufflation and it is a forger is not right. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not organismal hold that it is datable and it is ascomycetous is right. sent12: that there is something such that if the fact that it does not alibi cotenant hold the fact that it offers Cynara and is a paramilitary is incorrect is correct. sent13: the fact that the tabun is datable and ascomycetous if the tabun is not organismal is true. sent14: the fact that the potbelly does rekindle proctoscopy and does offer Auckland does not hold if that it is not datable is correct. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a Goodall then that it is crystalline and it grafts does not hold. sent16: the fact that the fact that the tabun is a kind of datable thing that is ascomycetous is correct is wrong if it is not organismal. sent17: if the coffeecake is not a typhoid the fact that it is both datable and vacuolate is not right. sent18: that something is datable and a transformation is not correct if the fact that it is not a kind of a Donar is correct. sent19: if the tabun is not a paramilitary then it is ascomycetous and avocational. sent20: there exists something such that if it is not a roast that it is a palpation and a theremin is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__