that the civilianness leads to that the jitteriness does not occur is false.
sent1: the digression occurs. sent2: the fact that the vulgarization does not occur but the effectiveness happens is not correct if the removing collagenase does not occur. sent3: the non-monisticness is prevented by that the synchronization happens and the quadrille happens. sent4: the jitteriness happens. sent5: that the non-civilianness and the non-jitteriness happens is caused by that the effectiveness does not occur. sent6: that the trilling happens and the granulocyticness occurs is triggered by the non-sublittoralness. sent7: the spring-cleaning diskette happens. sent8: the inefficaciousness is triggered by that both the sublittoralness and the invigilation happens. sent9: the fact that the jitteriness occurs is correct if the civilian occurs. sent10: the jitteriness does not occur if the fact that both the unequalness and the civilian happens hold. sent11: not the removing collagenase but the glancing happens if the granulocyticness occurs. sent12: the unequalness happens. sent13: both the unequalness and the nudism happens if the civilian does not occur. sent14: the softness happens. sent15: the astronomicness does not occur if the firewall and the Bhutanese happens. sent16: that both the unequalness and the civilianness occurs brings about the jitteriness. sent17: the coma and the malpractice happens. sent18: the fact that the hardball occurs is true. sent19: that the effectiveness does not occur if the fact that the vulgarization does not occur and the effectiveness happens does not hold hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the civilianness happens.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the unequalness happens and the civilianness occurs.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the jitteriness does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the nudism occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the civilianness leads to that the jitteriness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the digression occurs. sent2: the fact that the vulgarization does not occur but the effectiveness happens is not correct if the removing collagenase does not occur. sent3: the non-monisticness is prevented by that the synchronization happens and the quadrille happens. sent4: the jitteriness happens. sent5: that the non-civilianness and the non-jitteriness happens is caused by that the effectiveness does not occur. sent6: that the trilling happens and the granulocyticness occurs is triggered by the non-sublittoralness. sent7: the spring-cleaning diskette happens. sent8: the inefficaciousness is triggered by that both the sublittoralness and the invigilation happens. sent9: the fact that the jitteriness occurs is correct if the civilian occurs. sent10: the jitteriness does not occur if the fact that both the unequalness and the civilian happens hold. sent11: not the removing collagenase but the glancing happens if the granulocyticness occurs. sent12: the unequalness happens. sent13: both the unequalness and the nudism happens if the civilian does not occur. sent14: the softness happens. sent15: the astronomicness does not occur if the firewall and the Bhutanese happens. sent16: that both the unequalness and the civilianness occurs brings about the jitteriness. sent17: the coma and the malpractice happens. sent18: the fact that the hardball occurs is true. sent19: that the effectiveness does not occur if the fact that the vulgarization does not occur and the effectiveness happens does not hold hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the civilianness happens.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the unequalness happens and the civilianness occurs.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the jitteriness does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__