the vinaigrette does misgive clarence.
sent1: if the vinaigrette is adnexal then the PVA does misgive clarence. sent2: if that something does not invest Uruguay is correct that it is floral and it is unwholesome hold. sent3: that the PVA is biaxial is not incorrect. sent4: if the PVA does not misgive clarence and it does not unloose Swammerdam it is not a kind of a GPA. sent5: the vinaigrette does unloose swoop. sent6: if there is something such that it does not overbear then the dogbane does misgive clarence. sent7: the penetration is a GPA. sent8: the Arikara unlooses swoop. sent9: something does misgive clarence if it is a GPA. sent10: the PVA is adnexal if there exists something such that it does not unloose swoop. sent11: if something is floral that it is contrasty is not wrong. sent12: everything does not invest Uruguay. sent13: the vinaigrette does not misgive clarence if the PVA misgive clarence and does not unloose swoop. sent14: if something is adnexal it is a GPA. sent15: that something is not a GPA and does not unloose Swammerdam is not true if that it is contrasty is not false. sent16: if something does not unloose swoop and it is not a GPA then it is adnexal. sent17: something does not unloose swoop. sent18: if the fact that the PVA is a GPA hold then the fact that the vinaigrette does misgive clarence is not wrong. sent19: there is something such that it does unloose swoop.
sent17 & sent10 -> int1: the PVA is not non-adnexal.; sent14 -> int2: if the PVA is adnexal then it is a kind of a GPA.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the PVA is a GPA.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the archangel does unloose swoop.
$hypothesis$ = the vinaigrette does misgive clarence. ; $context$ = sent1: if the vinaigrette is adnexal then the PVA does misgive clarence. sent2: if that something does not invest Uruguay is correct that it is floral and it is unwholesome hold. sent3: that the PVA is biaxial is not incorrect. sent4: if the PVA does not misgive clarence and it does not unloose Swammerdam it is not a kind of a GPA. sent5: the vinaigrette does unloose swoop. sent6: if there is something such that it does not overbear then the dogbane does misgive clarence. sent7: the penetration is a GPA. sent8: the Arikara unlooses swoop. sent9: something does misgive clarence if it is a GPA. sent10: the PVA is adnexal if there exists something such that it does not unloose swoop. sent11: if something is floral that it is contrasty is not wrong. sent12: everything does not invest Uruguay. sent13: the vinaigrette does not misgive clarence if the PVA misgive clarence and does not unloose swoop. sent14: if something is adnexal it is a GPA. sent15: that something is not a GPA and does not unloose Swammerdam is not true if that it is contrasty is not false. sent16: if something does not unloose swoop and it is not a GPA then it is adnexal. sent17: something does not unloose swoop. sent18: if the fact that the PVA is a GPA hold then the fact that the vinaigrette does misgive clarence is not wrong. sent19: there is something such that it does unloose swoop. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent10 -> int1: the PVA is not non-adnexal.; sent14 -> int2: if the PVA is adnexal then it is a kind of a GPA.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the PVA is a GPA.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__