the mass does mediate.
sent1: the fact that the splitter does not bend mass and/or it is a Baltic is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that that it does bend mass and/or it is a Baltic does not hold. sent3: if something is nonmechanical it is avuncular. sent4: that the launch is a kind of a cabana that does disharmonize hold if the setterwort does not concern splitter. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a pout and/or it is Baltic is not correct the splitter is not anisogametic. sent6: something either does not foray or convects or both. sent7: the setterwort is nonmechanical. sent8: if something concerns splitter then the mass is a cabana and it disharmonizes. sent9: if there is something such that it does concern splitter then the mass disharmonizes. sent10: if the mass is not anisogametic and not a pout then it does not mediate. sent11: something is not a kind of a circular if it is volumetric. sent12: if something is not a circular then it does not concern splitter. sent13: the fact that if something is a cabana that disharmonizes then it is not a kind of a pout is not false. sent14: something concerns splitter. sent15: the setterwort is volumetric if it is avuncular. sent16: if the launch is a cabana the fact that the coverall is not anisogametic or it is not a pout or both is not correct. sent17: if there are non-anisogametic things then the splitter does flail. sent18: the splitter is not a cabana if there exists something such that that it does not bend mass or is mediated or both is wrong. sent19: there is something such that it is not anisogametic. sent20: something is a Pritzelago. sent21: the mass disharmonizes. sent22: the mass is not anisogametic if there exists something such that that it does not bend mass and/or it is a Baltic does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not bend mass and/or it is a Baltic is incorrect.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the mass is not anisogametic.; sent13 -> int3: if the mass is a cabana that disharmonizes it is not a pout.; sent14 & sent8 -> int4: the mass is a kind of a cabana that disharmonizes.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mass is not a kind of a pout.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the mass is a kind of non-anisogametic thing that does not pout.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the splitter is a flail and it is a kind of a townee.
sent19 & sent17 -> int7: the splitter is a kind of a flail.;
$hypothesis$ = the mass does mediate. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the splitter does not bend mass and/or it is a Baltic is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that that it does bend mass and/or it is a Baltic does not hold. sent3: if something is nonmechanical it is avuncular. sent4: that the launch is a kind of a cabana that does disharmonize hold if the setterwort does not concern splitter. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a pout and/or it is Baltic is not correct the splitter is not anisogametic. sent6: something either does not foray or convects or both. sent7: the setterwort is nonmechanical. sent8: if something concerns splitter then the mass is a cabana and it disharmonizes. sent9: if there is something such that it does concern splitter then the mass disharmonizes. sent10: if the mass is not anisogametic and not a pout then it does not mediate. sent11: something is not a kind of a circular if it is volumetric. sent12: if something is not a circular then it does not concern splitter. sent13: the fact that if something is a cabana that disharmonizes then it is not a kind of a pout is not false. sent14: something concerns splitter. sent15: the setterwort is volumetric if it is avuncular. sent16: if the launch is a cabana the fact that the coverall is not anisogametic or it is not a pout or both is not correct. sent17: if there are non-anisogametic things then the splitter does flail. sent18: the splitter is not a cabana if there exists something such that that it does not bend mass or is mediated or both is wrong. sent19: there is something such that it is not anisogametic. sent20: something is a Pritzelago. sent21: the mass disharmonizes. sent22: the mass is not anisogametic if there exists something such that that it does not bend mass and/or it is a Baltic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not bend mass and/or it is a Baltic is incorrect.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the mass is not anisogametic.; sent13 -> int3: if the mass is a cabana that disharmonizes it is not a pout.; sent14 & sent8 -> int4: the mass is a kind of a cabana that disharmonizes.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mass is not a kind of a pout.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the mass is a kind of non-anisogametic thing that does not pout.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__