if the pusher is a velar then the thermostat is not unpermissive.
sent1: if the fact that the pusher does not automobile and/or is not a flywheel is incorrect then the thermostat is not neuromuscular. sent2: if something is not neuromuscular then it is not unpermissive. sent3: if that the fact that the pusher does not curse and it is not a velar is not true is right it is not stemmatic. sent4: that something does not automobile or is not a kind of a flywheel or both is not correct if it is not stemmatic.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pusher is not a curse and it is not a kind of a velar.; assump2 -> int1: the pusher is not velar.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pusher is a velar.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the pusher is not a curse and is not velar does not hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the pusher is not stemmatic.; sent4 -> int5: if the pusher is not stemmatic then the fact that it either does not automobile or is not a kind of a flywheel or both is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the pusher does not automobile or it is not a kind of a flywheel or both is not right.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the thermostat is not neuromuscular.; sent2 -> int8: if the thermostat is not neuromuscular then the fact that it is unpermissive is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the thermostat is not unpermissive.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the pusher is a velar then the thermostat is not unpermissive. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the pusher does not automobile and/or is not a flywheel is incorrect then the thermostat is not neuromuscular. sent2: if something is not neuromuscular then it is not unpermissive. sent3: if that the fact that the pusher does not curse and it is not a velar is not true is right it is not stemmatic. sent4: that something does not automobile or is not a kind of a flywheel or both is not correct if it is not stemmatic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pusher is not a curse and it is not a kind of a velar.; assump2 -> int1: the pusher is not velar.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pusher is a velar.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the pusher is not a curse and is not velar does not hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the pusher is not stemmatic.; sent4 -> int5: if the pusher is not stemmatic then the fact that it either does not automobile or is not a kind of a flywheel or both is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the pusher does not automobile or it is not a kind of a flywheel or both is not right.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the thermostat is not neuromuscular.; sent2 -> int8: if the thermostat is not neuromuscular then the fact that it is unpermissive is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the thermostat is not unpermissive.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__