there exists something such that if it is a kind of a synonym then it does overturn effectiveness.
sent1: the cutch is not invisible. sent2: the typewriter does not overturn effectiveness. sent3: the cutch is not technophobic. sent4: the cutch averages ricer. sent5: the cutch does not overturn effectiveness if that it is not starchless is not wrong. sent6: if the cutch is a synonym then it is a wiggle. sent7: the yoke does not inflate tapered. sent8: the cutch is not easy. sent9: the isogamy is not a kind of a restfulness. sent10: the shoulder does overturn locule. sent11: there exists something such that if it is anisotropic then it is sentient. sent12: if the cutch is a kind of a restfulness it does not average Vishnu. sent13: the cutch is not a synonym if that it does not overturn effectiveness hold. sent14: the cutch does not fly. sent15: the ricer is a synonym. sent16: if the cutch does not overturn effectiveness it is a kind of a synonym. sent17: the hamster is a synonym. sent18: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a avulsion then it is a costliness is not incorrect. sent19: the cutch does not overturn hamster.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cutch does not overturn effectiveness.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the cutch is not a synonym.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cutch is a synonym.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the cutch does overturn effectiveness.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the cutch is a synonym it does overturn effectiveness.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a synonym then it does overturn effectiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: the cutch is not invisible. sent2: the typewriter does not overturn effectiveness. sent3: the cutch is not technophobic. sent4: the cutch averages ricer. sent5: the cutch does not overturn effectiveness if that it is not starchless is not wrong. sent6: if the cutch is a synonym then it is a wiggle. sent7: the yoke does not inflate tapered. sent8: the cutch is not easy. sent9: the isogamy is not a kind of a restfulness. sent10: the shoulder does overturn locule. sent11: there exists something such that if it is anisotropic then it is sentient. sent12: if the cutch is a kind of a restfulness it does not average Vishnu. sent13: the cutch is not a synonym if that it does not overturn effectiveness hold. sent14: the cutch does not fly. sent15: the ricer is a synonym. sent16: if the cutch does not overturn effectiveness it is a kind of a synonym. sent17: the hamster is a synonym. sent18: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a avulsion then it is a costliness is not incorrect. sent19: the cutch does not overturn hamster. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cutch does not overturn effectiveness.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the cutch is not a synonym.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cutch is a synonym.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the cutch does overturn effectiveness.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the cutch is a synonym it does overturn effectiveness.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__