not the pleochroicness but the anacliticness occurs.
sent1: the non-anacliticness is prevented by that the animist happens. sent2: the transubstantiation happens. sent3: if the Romanness does not occur that both the non-pleochroicness and the anacliticness occurs does not hold. sent4: the Romanness and/or the palatalizing occurs. sent5: if the palatalizing does not occur then the pleochroicness does not occur. sent6: the Romanness occurs. sent7: the animist happens if the transubstantiation occurs. sent8: the anorectalness happens and/or the factorizing elixir does not occur.
sent6 -> int1: either the Roman happens or the palatalizing does not occur or both.; sent7 & sent2 -> int2: the animist happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the anacliticness happens.;
that the pleochroicness does not occur and the anacliticness happens is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = not the pleochroicness but the anacliticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-anacliticness is prevented by that the animist happens. sent2: the transubstantiation happens. sent3: if the Romanness does not occur that both the non-pleochroicness and the anacliticness occurs does not hold. sent4: the Romanness and/or the palatalizing occurs. sent5: if the palatalizing does not occur then the pleochroicness does not occur. sent6: the Romanness occurs. sent7: the animist happens if the transubstantiation occurs. sent8: the anorectalness happens and/or the factorizing elixir does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: either the Roman happens or the palatalizing does not occur or both.; sent7 & sent2 -> int2: the animist happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the anacliticness happens.; __UNKNOWN__