the fact that the feminineness does not occur but the fictionalization happens is wrong.
sent1: the hazing clinch is triggered by the inorganicness. sent2: the fact that the feminine does not occur and the fictionalization occurs does not hold if the shrinkableness does not occur. sent3: the solemnizing toothpowder does not occur but the misbehaving happens if that the hazing clinch happens hold. sent4: if the suit occurs and the anisogamicness happens then the fittingness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the solemnizing tatou does not occur hold. sent6: the feminine does not occur if the non-malignness and the solemnizing toothpowder happens. sent7: the shrinkableness and the welling occurs. sent8: the suiting occurs. sent9: the solemnizing toothpowder occurs. sent10: if the well does not occur then the fact that the malignness happens and the shrinkableness happens is not right. sent11: the fictionalization happens. sent12: the solemnizing go-ahead occurs and the inorganicness happens if the fittingness does not occur. sent13: the dorsiflexion happens. sent14: that the dorsiflexion happens is prevented by that both the shrinkableness and the malignness occurs.
sent7 -> int1: the shrinkableness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malignness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the shrinkableness happens and the malignness happens.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the dorsiflexion does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the malignness does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: not the malignness but the solemnizing toothpowder occurs.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the feminine does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the feminine does not occur but the fictionalization occurs is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the feminineness does not occur but the fictionalization happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the hazing clinch is triggered by the inorganicness. sent2: the fact that the feminine does not occur and the fictionalization occurs does not hold if the shrinkableness does not occur. sent3: the solemnizing toothpowder does not occur but the misbehaving happens if that the hazing clinch happens hold. sent4: if the suit occurs and the anisogamicness happens then the fittingness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the solemnizing tatou does not occur hold. sent6: the feminine does not occur if the non-malignness and the solemnizing toothpowder happens. sent7: the shrinkableness and the welling occurs. sent8: the suiting occurs. sent9: the solemnizing toothpowder occurs. sent10: if the well does not occur then the fact that the malignness happens and the shrinkableness happens is not right. sent11: the fictionalization happens. sent12: the solemnizing go-ahead occurs and the inorganicness happens if the fittingness does not occur. sent13: the dorsiflexion happens. sent14: that the dorsiflexion happens is prevented by that both the shrinkableness and the malignness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the shrinkableness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malignness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the shrinkableness happens and the malignness happens.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the dorsiflexion does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the malignness does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: not the malignness but the solemnizing toothpowder occurs.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the feminine does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__