that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Trotskyite then that it does not nurse copyright and is algolagnic is wrong is incorrect.
sent1: if the three-decker is not a kind of a Trotskyite it does not nurse copyright and it is algolagnic. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not overprint augury that it is not botryoid and it hooks is false. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a Trotskyite it does not nurse copyright and it is algolagnic. sent4: if the allosaur is not a kind of a Lyginopteris then the fact that it is both not a scraper and botryoid does not hold. sent5: if the publicist is an estimate the fact that it is non-neoplastic thing that is a potted is wrong. sent6: if the three-decker is not a Trotskyite then the fact that it nurses copyright and is algolagnic is not correct. sent7: that the scarabaeid is not algolagnic and not non-idiomatic is false if it is not synclinal. sent8: if the three-decker is not algolagnic then that it is not a sunspot and it does become sole does not hold. sent9: if the three-decker does become saved that it is not a kind of a Trotskyite and it is a kind of a canonist is not right. sent10: that the three-decker does not nurse copyright and is algolagnic does not hold if it is not a Trotskyite. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not toothless then that it is not a scaffolding and it is a venography is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a Trotskyite the fact that it nurses copyright and is algolagnic does not hold. sent13: if the three-decker nurses copyright that it is non-thirsty thing that is a kind of a Blighia does not hold. sent14: the fact that something does not overrun allosaur and does overprint magnum is wrong if it is non-algolagnic. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a Trotskyite then that it does not nurse copyright and is algolagnic does not hold. sent16: that the three-decker is not algolagnic but it does overprint weaponry is not correct if it protuberates. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a decubitus then the fact that it is not a kind of a noisiness and overprints Cracow is not right.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the gully does not overrun allosaur but it overprints magnum is not correct if it is not algolagnic.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Trotskyite then that it does not nurse copyright and is algolagnic is wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the three-decker is not a kind of a Trotskyite it does not nurse copyright and it is algolagnic. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not overprint augury that it is not botryoid and it hooks is false. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a Trotskyite it does not nurse copyright and it is algolagnic. sent4: if the allosaur is not a kind of a Lyginopteris then the fact that it is both not a scraper and botryoid does not hold. sent5: if the publicist is an estimate the fact that it is non-neoplastic thing that is a potted is wrong. sent6: if the three-decker is not a Trotskyite then the fact that it nurses copyright and is algolagnic is not correct. sent7: that the scarabaeid is not algolagnic and not non-idiomatic is false if it is not synclinal. sent8: if the three-decker is not algolagnic then that it is not a sunspot and it does become sole does not hold. sent9: if the three-decker does become saved that it is not a kind of a Trotskyite and it is a kind of a canonist is not right. sent10: that the three-decker does not nurse copyright and is algolagnic does not hold if it is not a Trotskyite. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not toothless then that it is not a scaffolding and it is a venography is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a Trotskyite the fact that it nurses copyright and is algolagnic does not hold. sent13: if the three-decker nurses copyright that it is non-thirsty thing that is a kind of a Blighia does not hold. sent14: the fact that something does not overrun allosaur and does overprint magnum is wrong if it is non-algolagnic. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a Trotskyite then that it does not nurse copyright and is algolagnic does not hold. sent16: that the three-decker is not algolagnic but it does overprint weaponry is not correct if it protuberates. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a decubitus then the fact that it is not a kind of a noisiness and overprints Cracow is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__