the episode does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that both the blanketing ceriman and the antiadrenergicness occurs does not hold then the Dutchness does not occur. sent2: the episode happens if the fact that the non-noncollapsibleness and the jamming homeopath occurs is not right. sent3: the tetanus does not occur if that either the erythropoieticness occurs or the alarness happens or both is false. sent4: the fact that the ding-dong happens is not wrong. sent5: that the noncollapsibleness does not occur and the jamming homeopath occurs does not hold if the ding-dong occurs. sent6: if the fact that the tetanus does not occur is not incorrect then both the intrastateness and the Incarnation happens. sent7: if that either the blanketing Frost does not occur or the ding-dong occurs or both is incorrect then the fact that the episode does not occur is not false. sent8: that the fact that the noncollapsibleness occurs and the jamming homeopath happens is wrong is true. sent9: the fact that either the erythropoieticness happens or the alarness happens or both is wrong if the fact that the Dutchness occurs is not correct. sent10: the fact that the non-instructionalness and the eugenicness occurs does not hold. sent11: if the intrastateness happens that the blanketing Frost does not occur or the ding-dong happens or both is not true. sent12: if the blanketing Osborne occurs the fact that the blanketing chipper and the blanketing gesture occurs is not right.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that not the noncollapsibleness but the jamming homeopath happens is incorrect.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the episode does not occur is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the episode does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that both the blanketing ceriman and the antiadrenergicness occurs does not hold then the Dutchness does not occur. sent2: the episode happens if the fact that the non-noncollapsibleness and the jamming homeopath occurs is not right. sent3: the tetanus does not occur if that either the erythropoieticness occurs or the alarness happens or both is false. sent4: the fact that the ding-dong happens is not wrong. sent5: that the noncollapsibleness does not occur and the jamming homeopath occurs does not hold if the ding-dong occurs. sent6: if the fact that the tetanus does not occur is not incorrect then both the intrastateness and the Incarnation happens. sent7: if that either the blanketing Frost does not occur or the ding-dong occurs or both is incorrect then the fact that the episode does not occur is not false. sent8: that the fact that the noncollapsibleness occurs and the jamming homeopath happens is wrong is true. sent9: the fact that either the erythropoieticness happens or the alarness happens or both is wrong if the fact that the Dutchness occurs is not correct. sent10: the fact that the non-instructionalness and the eugenicness occurs does not hold. sent11: if the intrastateness happens that the blanketing Frost does not occur or the ding-dong happens or both is not true. sent12: if the blanketing Osborne occurs the fact that the blanketing chipper and the blanketing gesture occurs is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that not the noncollapsibleness but the jamming homeopath happens is incorrect.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__