the immunotherapy occurs.
sent1: if the epilepticness does not occur then both the immunotherapy and the investigating ultraviolet happens. sent2: the fact that the immersion occurs hold. sent3: that if the fact that the fact that the cericness does not occur and the immunotherapy does not occur is right is not true the calycealness does not occur hold. sent4: if the investigating ultraviolet does not occur the calycealness does not occur. sent5: the calycealness does not occur. sent6: if the telegraphicness happens then the unairworthiness does not occur. sent7: if that the bursting does not occur is right then that the investigating fine does not occur and the telegraphicness does not occur does not hold. sent8: the isotropicness happens. sent9: both the non-calycealness and the diffusing grand occurs if the investigating ultraviolet does not occur. sent10: the cericness happens. sent11: the lamplight does not occur. sent12: not the hollering but the abandoning Silybum occurs. sent13: that both the diffusing grand and the cericness occurs leads to that the immunotherapy does not occur. sent14: that the epileptic does not occur yields that both the clapping and the investigating ultraviolet occurs. sent15: the immersion does not occur if the fact that the investigating ultraviolet and the epilepticness happens is not wrong. sent16: if that the investigating fine does not occur and the telegraphicness does not occur is false then the telegraphicness occurs. sent17: the epileptic happens. sent18: if the unairworthiness does not occur the fact that the cericness does not occur and the immunotherapy does not occur is not correct. sent19: the hydroxiness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the investigating ultraviolet happens.; assump1 & sent17 -> int1: both the investigating ultraviolet and the epilepticness happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the immersion does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the investigating ultraviolet does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the non-calycealness and the diffusing grand occurs.; int5 -> int6: the diffusing grand occurs.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: both the diffusing grand and the cericness occurs.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the clapping happens hold.
$hypothesis$ = the immunotherapy occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the epilepticness does not occur then both the immunotherapy and the investigating ultraviolet happens. sent2: the fact that the immersion occurs hold. sent3: that if the fact that the fact that the cericness does not occur and the immunotherapy does not occur is right is not true the calycealness does not occur hold. sent4: if the investigating ultraviolet does not occur the calycealness does not occur. sent5: the calycealness does not occur. sent6: if the telegraphicness happens then the unairworthiness does not occur. sent7: if that the bursting does not occur is right then that the investigating fine does not occur and the telegraphicness does not occur does not hold. sent8: the isotropicness happens. sent9: both the non-calycealness and the diffusing grand occurs if the investigating ultraviolet does not occur. sent10: the cericness happens. sent11: the lamplight does not occur. sent12: not the hollering but the abandoning Silybum occurs. sent13: that both the diffusing grand and the cericness occurs leads to that the immunotherapy does not occur. sent14: that the epileptic does not occur yields that both the clapping and the investigating ultraviolet occurs. sent15: the immersion does not occur if the fact that the investigating ultraviolet and the epilepticness happens is not wrong. sent16: if that the investigating fine does not occur and the telegraphicness does not occur is false then the telegraphicness occurs. sent17: the epileptic happens. sent18: if the unairworthiness does not occur the fact that the cericness does not occur and the immunotherapy does not occur is not correct. sent19: the hydroxiness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the investigating ultraviolet happens.; assump1 & sent17 -> int1: both the investigating ultraviolet and the epilepticness happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the immersion does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the investigating ultraviolet does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the non-calycealness and the diffusing grand occurs.; int5 -> int6: the diffusing grand occurs.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: both the diffusing grand and the cericness occurs.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__