there is something such that if that it does thrill Christian and it does contort urceole is wrong it is not navigational.
sent1: the urceole is navigational if that it does thrill Christian and it contorts urceole does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is not archangelic then the fact that it is not a kind of a panpipe is right. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not contort urceole then it is not navigational. sent4: there is something such that if it is not areal it is not a collembolan. sent5: something does not fit conacaste if the fact that it is noncritical thing that is a dispersion is not correct. sent6: the fact that the urceole is not navigational is right if it does not contort urceole. sent7: if the fact that the urceole thrills Christian and does contort urceole is not right it is not navigational. sent8: if the fact that the urceole is a kind of a Juneberry that is areal does not hold then it is not a kind of a barbershop. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a ground it does not fit. sent10: the urceole is not navigational if it does thrill Christian and contorts urceole.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
the galago does not fit conacaste if the fact that it is a kind of noncritical a dispersion is incorrect.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does thrill Christian and it does contort urceole is wrong it is not navigational. ; $context$ = sent1: the urceole is navigational if that it does thrill Christian and it contorts urceole does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is not archangelic then the fact that it is not a kind of a panpipe is right. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not contort urceole then it is not navigational. sent4: there is something such that if it is not areal it is not a collembolan. sent5: something does not fit conacaste if the fact that it is noncritical thing that is a dispersion is not correct. sent6: the fact that the urceole is not navigational is right if it does not contort urceole. sent7: if the fact that the urceole thrills Christian and does contort urceole is not right it is not navigational. sent8: if the fact that the urceole is a kind of a Juneberry that is areal does not hold then it is not a kind of a barbershop. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a ground it does not fit. sent10: the urceole is not navigational if it does thrill Christian and contorts urceole. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__