that the fichu is not a Colubridae is not wrong.
sent1: something that is not a subpoena and is a cuckoopint is a particulate. sent2: there exists something such that it unseals expectation. sent3: if the gonif is not non-naive and it is ecdemic the fichu is not a Colubridae. sent4: the calash is not particulate. sent5: if the gonif riffles fingerprinting then it is naive. sent6: if that something is a particulate that is not naive is not true then it is not a kind of a particulate. sent7: the calash does not riffle fingerprinting and is ecdemic if the gonif is not particulate. sent8: the calash is a kind of a particulate if it is a subpoena and it is a cuckoopint. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a subpoena and a cuckoopint does not hold the gonif riffles fingerprinting. sent10: if that something is a Adapid but it is not a sovereignty is wrong then it is a kind of a Colubridae.
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the calash is not a subpoena but it is a cuckoopint is not incorrect then it is not nonparticulate.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calash does not subpoena but it is a kind of a cuckoopint.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the calash is particulate.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the calash is not a subpoena but a cuckoopint is incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not a subpoena and is a cuckoopint is incorrect.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the gonif riffles fingerprinting.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the gonif is naive.;
the calash is ecdemic.
sent6 -> int8: if the fact that the gonif is a kind of a particulate but it is not naive is false then it is not particulate.; sent10 -> int9: if that the gonif is a Adapid but it is not a kind of a sovereignty is wrong it is a Colubridae.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fichu is not a Colubridae is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a subpoena and is a cuckoopint is a particulate. sent2: there exists something such that it unseals expectation. sent3: if the gonif is not non-naive and it is ecdemic the fichu is not a Colubridae. sent4: the calash is not particulate. sent5: if the gonif riffles fingerprinting then it is naive. sent6: if that something is a particulate that is not naive is not true then it is not a kind of a particulate. sent7: the calash does not riffle fingerprinting and is ecdemic if the gonif is not particulate. sent8: the calash is a kind of a particulate if it is a subpoena and it is a cuckoopint. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a subpoena and a cuckoopint does not hold the gonif riffles fingerprinting. sent10: if that something is a Adapid but it is not a sovereignty is wrong then it is a kind of a Colubridae. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the calash is not a subpoena but it is a cuckoopint is not incorrect then it is not nonparticulate.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calash does not subpoena but it is a kind of a cuckoopint.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the calash is particulate.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the calash is not a subpoena but a cuckoopint is incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not a subpoena and is a cuckoopint is incorrect.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the gonif riffles fingerprinting.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the gonif is naive.; __UNKNOWN__