there is something such that if it is capsular that it is not uterine and it does not guarantee Buxus is wrong.
sent1: if something is eutherian then that it is not a chicory and it does not laicize dichotomy is not true. sent2: there is something such that if it is a contradistinction then that it is not successful and it does not resile is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Limonium that that it is not aplacental and is not a leporide is not wrong is false. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a novobiocin is true that it is not lowborn and it is not a Antiguan does not hold. sent5: that if the exponent is capsular the exponent is not uterine and does not guarantee Buxus hold. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not mellow is false the fact that it is not a Nevada and it does not laicize dioxin is wrong. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is capsular hold it is not uterine and it does not guarantee Buxus. sent8: there is something such that if it is lowborn that it does not queen indemnification and is not a SCNT does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it is Jain then the fact that the fact that it is not a glottochronology and is not an inquest is not wrong does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it is a tripling the fact that it does not queen plasmin and it is not a chicory does not hold. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it is woolen then the fact that it is both non-cash-and-carry and nonindulgent is false is true. sent12: the fact that the exponent is not uterine and it does not guarantee Buxus is not correct if it is capsular. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is capsular hold the fact that it is uterine and does not guarantee Buxus does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if that it does queen exponent is not incorrect then that it is a kind of non-Dalmatian thing that does not queen sorcerer does not hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of a bastnasite then the fact that it is not pro and it is not anthropocentric is not right. sent16: if the exponent is a Nevada then the fact that it is not anonymous and it does not queen exponent is not true. sent17: the fact that there is something such that if it is sericultural then that it is not a atelier and not an orderly is wrong is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the exponent is uterine but it does not guarantee Buxus is not right if it is capsular. sent19: if the exponent is capsular the fact that it is non-uterine thing that does guarantee Buxus is wrong. sent20: there is something such that if it is capsular then the fact that it is not uterine and it guarantees Buxus is not true. sent21: there is something such that if it is a umbrellawort the fact that it does not fresco and it is not uncontroversial is not correct.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is eutherian then the fact that it is not a chicory and it does not laicize dichotomy is not correct.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the sugarplum is not a chicory and it does not laicize dichotomy is not correct if that it is eutherian is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is capsular that it is not uterine and it does not guarantee Buxus is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is eutherian then that it is not a chicory and it does not laicize dichotomy is not true. sent2: there is something such that if it is a contradistinction then that it is not successful and it does not resile is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Limonium that that it is not aplacental and is not a leporide is not wrong is false. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a novobiocin is true that it is not lowborn and it is not a Antiguan does not hold. sent5: that if the exponent is capsular the exponent is not uterine and does not guarantee Buxus hold. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not mellow is false the fact that it is not a Nevada and it does not laicize dioxin is wrong. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is capsular hold it is not uterine and it does not guarantee Buxus. sent8: there is something such that if it is lowborn that it does not queen indemnification and is not a SCNT does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it is Jain then the fact that the fact that it is not a glottochronology and is not an inquest is not wrong does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it is a tripling the fact that it does not queen plasmin and it is not a chicory does not hold. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it is woolen then the fact that it is both non-cash-and-carry and nonindulgent is false is true. sent12: the fact that the exponent is not uterine and it does not guarantee Buxus is not correct if it is capsular. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is capsular hold the fact that it is uterine and does not guarantee Buxus does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if that it does queen exponent is not incorrect then that it is a kind of non-Dalmatian thing that does not queen sorcerer does not hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of a bastnasite then the fact that it is not pro and it is not anthropocentric is not right. sent16: if the exponent is a Nevada then the fact that it is not anonymous and it does not queen exponent is not true. sent17: the fact that there is something such that if it is sericultural then that it is not a atelier and not an orderly is wrong is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the exponent is uterine but it does not guarantee Buxus is not right if it is capsular. sent19: if the exponent is capsular the fact that it is non-uterine thing that does guarantee Buxus is wrong. sent20: there is something such that if it is capsular then the fact that it is not uterine and it guarantees Buxus is not true. sent21: there is something such that if it is a umbrellawort the fact that it does not fresco and it is not uncontroversial is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__