the fact that the mahogany is morphologic and concretizes calpac is not true.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a tetrose and it does not lace calendar is not true the iva is not a Phaethon. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a brakeman then the titfer is unpresidential. sent3: if the calpac is a kind of a foresail then that the titfer is not morphologic and it is not unpresidential is wrong. sent4: the outercourse is subordinating if the titfer is unpresidential. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a subordinating. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is a brakeman and it is not complimentary is false. sent7: that the amphidiploid is not a brakeman and it is not complimentary is false. sent8: the sombrero is anatropous. sent9: the fact that the amphidiploid is a brakeman but it is not complimentary is wrong. sent10: if something is anatropous that the outercourse is not a foresail and it is not a general is incorrect. sent11: if that the sombrero does not writhe and is a general does not hold then the outercourse is not anatropous. sent12: something subordinates or it does concretize calpac or both if it is not anatropous. sent13: the swathing is a subordinating. sent14: the fact that the sombrero does not writhe and is a kind of a general is incorrect if something is not a kind of a Phaethon. sent15: if that the fact that something is not a foresail and is non-general is not incorrect is not right it is a kind of a foresail. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is a Lucy that is not true is not correct. sent17: if the fact that the alkylbenzenesulfonate descries reciprocal is true then the fact that it is a tetrose and does not lace calendar is not correct. sent18: the fact that the mahogany is morphologic thing that does concretize calpac is wrong if the calpac is not morphologic. sent19: the alkylbenzenesulfonate descries reciprocal and it is a sporting. sent20: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a Lucy that is not a kind of a true is incorrect then the man-on-a-horse is not a Lucy. sent21: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a brakeman and is not complimentary is not true the titfer is unpresidential. sent22: that if there is something such that it is a kind of subordinating thing that is a foresail then the calpac is not morphologic hold. sent23: there exists something such that that it is both not a brakeman and not uncomplimentary is false. sent24: the amphidiploid is unpresidential if the fact that it is unpresidential and is not a brakeman is incorrect. sent25: if the man-on-a-horse is not a Lucy and/or it is associative then the calpac is a foresail. sent26: the mahogany is morphologic if the fact that the titfer is not morphologic and is presidential is false.
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a brakeman and not complimentary is false.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the titfer is unpresidential.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the outercourse is a kind of a subordinating is right.; sent15 -> int4: if the fact that the outercourse is not a foresail and it is not general is not right then it is a foresail.; sent8 -> int5: there exists something such that it is anatropous.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the outercourse is both not a foresail and not general is wrong.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the outercourse is a foresail.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the outercourse subordinates and it is a foresail.; int8 -> int9: the fact that there is something such that it does subordinate and it is a kind of a foresail hold.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the calpac is not morphologic.; int10 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the mahogany is a kind of morphologic thing that does concretize calpac.
sent16 & sent20 -> int11: the man-on-a-horse is not a kind of a Lucy.; int11 -> int12: the man-on-a-horse is not a Lucy and/or it is associative.; sent25 & int12 -> int13: the calpac is a foresail.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the fact that the titfer is non-morphologic and presidential is not right is right.; sent26 & int14 -> int15: the mahogany is morphologic.; sent12 -> int16: the outercourse is subordinating and/or concretizes calpac if it is not anatropous.; sent19 -> int17: the alkylbenzenesulfonate does descry reciprocal.; sent17 & int17 -> int18: that the alkylbenzenesulfonate is a tetrose that does not lace calendar is not correct.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that that it is a tetrose and it does not lace calendar is not true.; int19 & sent1 -> int20: the iva is not a Phaethon.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that it is not a Phaethon.; int21 & sent14 -> int22: the fact that the sombrero does not writhe and is a general is incorrect.; sent11 & int22 -> int23: the outercourse is not anatropous.; int16 & int23 -> int24: the outercourse is a subordinating and/or does concretize calpac.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mahogany is morphologic and concretizes calpac is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a tetrose and it does not lace calendar is not true the iva is not a Phaethon. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a brakeman then the titfer is unpresidential. sent3: if the calpac is a kind of a foresail then that the titfer is not morphologic and it is not unpresidential is wrong. sent4: the outercourse is subordinating if the titfer is unpresidential. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a subordinating. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is a brakeman and it is not complimentary is false. sent7: that the amphidiploid is not a brakeman and it is not complimentary is false. sent8: the sombrero is anatropous. sent9: the fact that the amphidiploid is a brakeman but it is not complimentary is wrong. sent10: if something is anatropous that the outercourse is not a foresail and it is not a general is incorrect. sent11: if that the sombrero does not writhe and is a general does not hold then the outercourse is not anatropous. sent12: something subordinates or it does concretize calpac or both if it is not anatropous. sent13: the swathing is a subordinating. sent14: the fact that the sombrero does not writhe and is a kind of a general is incorrect if something is not a kind of a Phaethon. sent15: if that the fact that something is not a foresail and is non-general is not incorrect is not right it is a kind of a foresail. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is a Lucy that is not true is not correct. sent17: if the fact that the alkylbenzenesulfonate descries reciprocal is true then the fact that it is a tetrose and does not lace calendar is not correct. sent18: the fact that the mahogany is morphologic thing that does concretize calpac is wrong if the calpac is not morphologic. sent19: the alkylbenzenesulfonate descries reciprocal and it is a sporting. sent20: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a Lucy that is not a kind of a true is incorrect then the man-on-a-horse is not a Lucy. sent21: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a brakeman and is not complimentary is not true the titfer is unpresidential. sent22: that if there is something such that it is a kind of subordinating thing that is a foresail then the calpac is not morphologic hold. sent23: there exists something such that that it is both not a brakeman and not uncomplimentary is false. sent24: the amphidiploid is unpresidential if the fact that it is unpresidential and is not a brakeman is incorrect. sent25: if the man-on-a-horse is not a Lucy and/or it is associative then the calpac is a foresail. sent26: the mahogany is morphologic if the fact that the titfer is not morphologic and is presidential is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a brakeman and not complimentary is false.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the titfer is unpresidential.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the outercourse is a kind of a subordinating is right.; sent15 -> int4: if the fact that the outercourse is not a foresail and it is not general is not right then it is a foresail.; sent8 -> int5: there exists something such that it is anatropous.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the outercourse is both not a foresail and not general is wrong.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the outercourse is a foresail.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the outercourse subordinates and it is a foresail.; int8 -> int9: the fact that there is something such that it does subordinate and it is a kind of a foresail hold.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the calpac is not morphologic.; int10 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__