that the stretcher-bearer does not startle Kroto is not wrong.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not startle million and it is a Muscari then the cyclist is not a kind of a li. sent2: if something does not update Anabaptism then that it is a kind of a one-fifth and does not startle savoir-faire does not hold. sent3: that the CD8 is not a kind of a Muscari if the protein is a Muscari and does not update Anabaptism is right. sent4: if the fact that the OR is a kind of a one-fifth and does not startle savoir-faire is false the protein is not a kind of an indicative. sent5: the protein is not indicative if the OR is not a kind of a one-fifth. sent6: the stretcher-bearer is indicative but it does not update Anabaptism if the protein is not a backbone. sent7: the protein is an indicative. sent8: if something is indicative but it does not update Anabaptism it does startle Kroto. sent9: if the fact that the supergrass is a backbone that is a li does not hold the protein is not a backbone. sent10: the OR is a kind of a backbone if it updates Anabaptism. sent11: the jean does dropkick Azeri.
sent2 -> int1: if that the OR does not update Anabaptism is not incorrect then that it is a kind of a one-fifth and it does not startle savoir-faire is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the OR does not update Anabaptism.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the OR is a one-fifth but it does not startle savoir-faire does not hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the protein is not a kind of an indicative.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the OR updates Anabaptism.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the OR is a backbone.; int6 -> int7: the OR is a Muscari and/or it is a backbone.; int7 -> int8: something is a Muscari and/or a backbone.;
the CD8 is not a Muscari.
$hypothesis$ = that the stretcher-bearer does not startle Kroto is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not startle million and it is a Muscari then the cyclist is not a kind of a li. sent2: if something does not update Anabaptism then that it is a kind of a one-fifth and does not startle savoir-faire does not hold. sent3: that the CD8 is not a kind of a Muscari if the protein is a Muscari and does not update Anabaptism is right. sent4: if the fact that the OR is a kind of a one-fifth and does not startle savoir-faire is false the protein is not a kind of an indicative. sent5: the protein is not indicative if the OR is not a kind of a one-fifth. sent6: the stretcher-bearer is indicative but it does not update Anabaptism if the protein is not a backbone. sent7: the protein is an indicative. sent8: if something is indicative but it does not update Anabaptism it does startle Kroto. sent9: if the fact that the supergrass is a backbone that is a li does not hold the protein is not a backbone. sent10: the OR is a kind of a backbone if it updates Anabaptism. sent11: the jean does dropkick Azeri. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if that the OR does not update Anabaptism is not incorrect then that it is a kind of a one-fifth and it does not startle savoir-faire is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the OR does not update Anabaptism.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the OR is a one-fifth but it does not startle savoir-faire does not hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the protein is not a kind of an indicative.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the OR updates Anabaptism.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the OR is a backbone.; int6 -> int7: the OR is a Muscari and/or it is a backbone.; int7 -> int8: something is a Muscari and/or a backbone.; __UNKNOWN__