the fact that that the reddening toaster does not occur causes that the scanning does not occur and the dishing does not occur is false.
sent1: the shrieking results in that the scanning does not occur and the dithyramb does not occur. sent2: the impersonating does not occur if the cowardliness does not occur and the receiving does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the cowardliness does not occur and the receiving does not occur is not right that the getting plow does not occur is correct. sent4: the dish does not occur if the fact that the reddening toaster does not occur is correct. sent5: if the getting plow does not occur the scanning happens but the dishing does not occur. sent6: that if the teachership does not occur then that the outerness does not occur and the impersonating happens is not correct hold. sent7: if that the migrationalness does not occur and the angling chaetodon does not occur is not true then the distributing does not occur. sent8: if the crucifying tetracaine does not occur then the celiacness occurs. sent9: that the cowardliness but not the receiving occurs is not right. sent10: that the shaping does not occur and the animatisticness does not occur is brought about by the non-arbitralness. sent11: the getting plow does not occur if the cowardliness occurs. sent12: the reddening toaster occurs if the teachership occurs. sent13: that the cowardliness happens but the receiving does not occur prevents that the impersonating occurs. sent14: if the celibacy does not occur then the elective occurs. sent15: the dishing does not occur. sent16: the getting discernability occurs. sent17: if the fact that the crucifying Tagalog does not occur and the impersonating does not occur is false the crucifying Tagalog happens. sent18: that the outerness happens if the fact that the non-outerness and the impersonating happens is incorrect is not wrong. sent19: the scanning but not the dishing occurs. sent20: if the fact that the getting plow does not occur is not false then the fact that the scanning does not occur and the dishing does not occur hold. sent21: the cowardliness does not occur. sent22: that the dishing and the getting plow occurs is triggered by that the scanning does not occur. sent23: the scanning but not the dishing occurs if the reddening toaster does not occur. sent24: if the getting plow does not occur then the fact that the dish does not occur is not wrong. sent25: the teachership occurs if the impersonating does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cowardliness does not occur and the receiving does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the impersonating does not occur.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the teachership occurs.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the reddening toaster happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the reddening toaster does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the cowardliness does not occur and the receiving does not occur is false.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the getting plow does not occur.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the scanning does not occur and the dish does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the crucifying Tagalog happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the reddening toaster does not occur causes that the scanning does not occur and the dishing does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the shrieking results in that the scanning does not occur and the dithyramb does not occur. sent2: the impersonating does not occur if the cowardliness does not occur and the receiving does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the cowardliness does not occur and the receiving does not occur is not right that the getting plow does not occur is correct. sent4: the dish does not occur if the fact that the reddening toaster does not occur is correct. sent5: if the getting plow does not occur the scanning happens but the dishing does not occur. sent6: that if the teachership does not occur then that the outerness does not occur and the impersonating happens is not correct hold. sent7: if that the migrationalness does not occur and the angling chaetodon does not occur is not true then the distributing does not occur. sent8: if the crucifying tetracaine does not occur then the celiacness occurs. sent9: that the cowardliness but not the receiving occurs is not right. sent10: that the shaping does not occur and the animatisticness does not occur is brought about by the non-arbitralness. sent11: the getting plow does not occur if the cowardliness occurs. sent12: the reddening toaster occurs if the teachership occurs. sent13: that the cowardliness happens but the receiving does not occur prevents that the impersonating occurs. sent14: if the celibacy does not occur then the elective occurs. sent15: the dishing does not occur. sent16: the getting discernability occurs. sent17: if the fact that the crucifying Tagalog does not occur and the impersonating does not occur is false the crucifying Tagalog happens. sent18: that the outerness happens if the fact that the non-outerness and the impersonating happens is incorrect is not wrong. sent19: the scanning but not the dishing occurs. sent20: if the fact that the getting plow does not occur is not false then the fact that the scanning does not occur and the dishing does not occur hold. sent21: the cowardliness does not occur. sent22: that the dishing and the getting plow occurs is triggered by that the scanning does not occur. sent23: the scanning but not the dishing occurs if the reddening toaster does not occur. sent24: if the getting plow does not occur then the fact that the dish does not occur is not wrong. sent25: the teachership occurs if the impersonating does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cowardliness does not occur and the receiving does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the impersonating does not occur.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the teachership occurs.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the reddening toaster happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the reddening toaster does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the cowardliness does not occur and the receiving does not occur is false.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the getting plow does not occur.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the scanning does not occur and the dish does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__