that the non-obligateness brings about that the spectacles does not occur and/or that the oceanicness does not occur is false.
sent1: either the reversed does not occur or the casualty does not occur or both. sent2: the underwriting bulldog does not occur and/or the preservation does not occur if the extending ketohexose does not occur. sent3: the fact that the winter does not occur hold. sent4: the spectacles does not occur and/or the oceanicness occurs. sent5: the fact that the burglary does not occur and the obligateness does not occur is not right if the Spark does not occur. sent6: the stubbing cancan occurs if the javelin occurs. sent7: if that the unidimensionalness occurs and the Spark occurs is not correct then the fact that the Spark does not occur is right. sent8: the intraventricularness does not occur if the Hispanic occurs and/or the extending widowed happens. sent9: the fact that the burglary does not occur but the obligating occurs does not hold. sent10: the burglary does not occur if the extensileness and/or the materialization happens. sent11: either the hooflikeness does not occur or the huff does not occur or both. sent12: the fact that the pilferage occurs and the romanticizing occurs is false if the sliming Jason does not occur. sent13: the spectacles yields the extensileness. sent14: the nepotism does not occur. sent15: the scheme does not occur if the cleanness and/or the polo happens. sent16: the fact that if the underwriting sprinkler does not occur that not the services but the achenialness occurs is not true hold. sent17: the fact that the underwriting sprinkler does not occur is right. sent18: the fact that the polo does not occur and the sliming apex does not occur does not hold. sent19: the crying happens. sent20: the fact that the unidimensionalness happens and the Spark occurs is incorrect if the nepotism does not occur. sent21: that the thunderbolt does not occur yields that either the caprineness or the non-pantheistness or both occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectacles happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the extensileness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the extensileness happens and/or the materialization occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the burglary does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the obligating does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: the burglary does not occur and the obligateness does not occur.; sent20 & sent14 -> int5: that both the unidimensionalness and the Spark occurs is incorrect.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the Spark does not occur.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: that the burglary does not occur and the obligating does not occur is incorrect.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the spectacles does not occur.; int9 -> int10: the spectacles does not occur and/or the oceanicness does not occur.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the non-obligateness brings about that the spectacles does not occur and/or that the oceanicness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: either the reversed does not occur or the casualty does not occur or both. sent2: the underwriting bulldog does not occur and/or the preservation does not occur if the extending ketohexose does not occur. sent3: the fact that the winter does not occur hold. sent4: the spectacles does not occur and/or the oceanicness occurs. sent5: the fact that the burglary does not occur and the obligateness does not occur is not right if the Spark does not occur. sent6: the stubbing cancan occurs if the javelin occurs. sent7: if that the unidimensionalness occurs and the Spark occurs is not correct then the fact that the Spark does not occur is right. sent8: the intraventricularness does not occur if the Hispanic occurs and/or the extending widowed happens. sent9: the fact that the burglary does not occur but the obligating occurs does not hold. sent10: the burglary does not occur if the extensileness and/or the materialization happens. sent11: either the hooflikeness does not occur or the huff does not occur or both. sent12: the fact that the pilferage occurs and the romanticizing occurs is false if the sliming Jason does not occur. sent13: the spectacles yields the extensileness. sent14: the nepotism does not occur. sent15: the scheme does not occur if the cleanness and/or the polo happens. sent16: the fact that if the underwriting sprinkler does not occur that not the services but the achenialness occurs is not true hold. sent17: the fact that the underwriting sprinkler does not occur is right. sent18: the fact that the polo does not occur and the sliming apex does not occur does not hold. sent19: the crying happens. sent20: the fact that the unidimensionalness happens and the Spark occurs is incorrect if the nepotism does not occur. sent21: that the thunderbolt does not occur yields that either the caprineness or the non-pantheistness or both occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectacles happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the extensileness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the extensileness happens and/or the materialization occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the burglary does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the obligating does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: the burglary does not occur and the obligateness does not occur.; sent20 & sent14 -> int5: that both the unidimensionalness and the Spark occurs is incorrect.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the Spark does not occur.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: that the burglary does not occur and the obligating does not occur is incorrect.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the spectacles does not occur.; int9 -> int10: the spectacles does not occur and/or the oceanicness does not occur.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__