the celery is a nosed but it is not a kind of a copyhold.
sent1: the Kichai is a dart if the Plantation is a dart. sent2: the entoproct is a isometrics if there exists something such that that it does not lob collision hold. sent3: something is not a portal if the fact that it is not Dionysian and it does not beckon is false. sent4: that the fact that the Eyeish is not Dionysian and it does not beckon is wrong is not false if the Kichai is a kind of a devices. sent5: if the IAA is a kind of a incomprehensibility the celery is cognitive. sent6: the fact that if the readout is inattentive the IAA is a kind of a incomprehensibility is right. sent7: something is a URL if it is a bristlegrass. sent8: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a URL and not a bristlegrass is incorrect the celery is a dart is not false. sent9: if something is not a portal it is a dart and is a directorate. sent10: everything is a incomprehensibility and it is inattentive. sent11: if there is something such that it does not abate then the Plantation does not lob collision. sent12: if that something does dart hold then it is a kind of a bristlegrass. sent13: the prompter does not abate. sent14: if something is a dart then that it is a bristlegrass and it is not a URL is not correct. sent15: if the celery is a kind of a dart it is a nosed and not a copyhold. sent16: if the fact that that something is not a isometrics and does not bog acidity hold is false it is a kind of a devices. sent17: if something is a incomprehensibility the fact that it is not a kind of a URL and it is not a kind of a bristlegrass is not right. sent18: the celery does edge celery if the fact that the Eyeish edge celery is not wrong. sent19: if the fact that the Kichai is a kind of a bristlegrass but it is not a kind of a URL is wrong then the Eyeish edges celery. sent20: the readout is inattentive if the Eyeish is a URL. sent21: the fact that the readout is both not a incomprehensibility and inattentive is wrong if something is a kind of a incomprehensibility.
sent10 -> int1: the Oregonian is a incomprehensibility and it is inattentive.; int1 -> int2: the Oregonian is a incomprehensibility.; sent17 -> int3: that the Oregonian is both not a URL and not a bristlegrass is wrong if the fact that it is a incomprehensibility is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Oregonian is both not a URL and not a bristlegrass is not right.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not a URL and is not a kind of a bristlegrass does not hold.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the celery darts.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the celery is cognitive and it edges celery.
sent14 -> int7: if the Kichai does dart that it is both a bristlegrass and not a URL is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the celery is a nosed but it is not a kind of a copyhold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Kichai is a dart if the Plantation is a dart. sent2: the entoproct is a isometrics if there exists something such that that it does not lob collision hold. sent3: something is not a portal if the fact that it is not Dionysian and it does not beckon is false. sent4: that the fact that the Eyeish is not Dionysian and it does not beckon is wrong is not false if the Kichai is a kind of a devices. sent5: if the IAA is a kind of a incomprehensibility the celery is cognitive. sent6: the fact that if the readout is inattentive the IAA is a kind of a incomprehensibility is right. sent7: something is a URL if it is a bristlegrass. sent8: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a URL and not a bristlegrass is incorrect the celery is a dart is not false. sent9: if something is not a portal it is a dart and is a directorate. sent10: everything is a incomprehensibility and it is inattentive. sent11: if there is something such that it does not abate then the Plantation does not lob collision. sent12: if that something does dart hold then it is a kind of a bristlegrass. sent13: the prompter does not abate. sent14: if something is a dart then that it is a bristlegrass and it is not a URL is not correct. sent15: if the celery is a kind of a dart it is a nosed and not a copyhold. sent16: if the fact that that something is not a isometrics and does not bog acidity hold is false it is a kind of a devices. sent17: if something is a incomprehensibility the fact that it is not a kind of a URL and it is not a kind of a bristlegrass is not right. sent18: the celery does edge celery if the fact that the Eyeish edge celery is not wrong. sent19: if the fact that the Kichai is a kind of a bristlegrass but it is not a kind of a URL is wrong then the Eyeish edges celery. sent20: the readout is inattentive if the Eyeish is a URL. sent21: the fact that the readout is both not a incomprehensibility and inattentive is wrong if something is a kind of a incomprehensibility. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the Oregonian is a incomprehensibility and it is inattentive.; int1 -> int2: the Oregonian is a incomprehensibility.; sent17 -> int3: that the Oregonian is both not a URL and not a bristlegrass is wrong if the fact that it is a incomprehensibility is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Oregonian is both not a URL and not a bristlegrass is not right.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not a URL and is not a kind of a bristlegrass does not hold.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the celery darts.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__