the reseda does not quarrel.
sent1: that the acquirer is a kind of a bash that is not a medication is not correct if the Scandinavian is not polyvalent. sent2: something is not a quarrel and is a kind of a Rastafarianism if that it is migratory is not incorrect. sent3: the reseda is pemphigous. sent4: the reseda is not an eroticism if that either the carrageenin is a kind of an eroticism or it does tease violinist or both is not right. sent5: the palmist is a quarrel. sent6: that the Scandinavian is not polyvalent is true. sent7: the pronator is a Rastafarianism. sent8: the pronator rims. sent9: something solemnizes tumor and is a rim if it is not an eroticism. sent10: the slasher is a kind of a re-formation if the autoradiography does solemnize disposal. sent11: that the carrageenin is not nonmigratory but it does not solemnize tumor does not hold if the pronator does rim. sent12: the fact that the reseda is a Rastafarianism is not true. sent13: if that the acquirer is a kind of a bash and is not a medication is false then it is a kind of a Limacidae. sent14: that that the carrageenin is a kind of an eroticism and/or it teases violinist is not correct is not wrong if the pronator is not a palliative. sent15: the slasher is a cosmopolitan if the acquirer is a Limacidae. sent16: if the fact that something is a kind of migratory thing that does not solemnize tumor does not hold it is migratory. sent17: if something solemnizes tumor then it is migratory. sent18: the autoradiography does solemnize disposal. sent19: the fact that the carrageenin is migratory is correct if the reseda is not a quarrel and is not a Rastafarianism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reseda does not quarrel.; assump1 & sent12 -> int1: the reseda is not a quarrel and it is not a Rastafarianism.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the carrageenin is migratory.; sent16 -> int3: the carrageenin is not migratory if the fact that it is migratory and it does not solemnize tumor is incorrect.; sent11 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the carrageenin is migratory thing that does not solemnize tumor is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the carrageenin is not migratory.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the reseda is not a kind of a quarrel.
sent2 -> int7: that the reseda is not a quarrel but a Rastafarianism hold if it is migratory.; sent17 -> int8: the reseda is migratory if it does solemnize tumor.; sent9 -> int9: the reseda solemnizes tumor and it is a kind of a rim if it is not an eroticism.; sent10 & sent18 -> int10: the slasher is a kind of a re-formation.; sent1 & sent6 -> int11: the fact that the acquirer is a bash that is not a medication is not right.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the acquirer is a Limacidae.; sent15 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the slasher is cosmopolitan hold.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the slasher is a re-formation and is a cosmopolitan.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it is a kind of a re-formation and it is a cosmopolitan.;
$hypothesis$ = the reseda does not quarrel. ; $context$ = sent1: that the acquirer is a kind of a bash that is not a medication is not correct if the Scandinavian is not polyvalent. sent2: something is not a quarrel and is a kind of a Rastafarianism if that it is migratory is not incorrect. sent3: the reseda is pemphigous. sent4: the reseda is not an eroticism if that either the carrageenin is a kind of an eroticism or it does tease violinist or both is not right. sent5: the palmist is a quarrel. sent6: that the Scandinavian is not polyvalent is true. sent7: the pronator is a Rastafarianism. sent8: the pronator rims. sent9: something solemnizes tumor and is a rim if it is not an eroticism. sent10: the slasher is a kind of a re-formation if the autoradiography does solemnize disposal. sent11: that the carrageenin is not nonmigratory but it does not solemnize tumor does not hold if the pronator does rim. sent12: the fact that the reseda is a Rastafarianism is not true. sent13: if that the acquirer is a kind of a bash and is not a medication is false then it is a kind of a Limacidae. sent14: that that the carrageenin is a kind of an eroticism and/or it teases violinist is not correct is not wrong if the pronator is not a palliative. sent15: the slasher is a cosmopolitan if the acquirer is a Limacidae. sent16: if the fact that something is a kind of migratory thing that does not solemnize tumor does not hold it is migratory. sent17: if something solemnizes tumor then it is migratory. sent18: the autoradiography does solemnize disposal. sent19: the fact that the carrageenin is migratory is correct if the reseda is not a quarrel and is not a Rastafarianism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reseda does not quarrel.; assump1 & sent12 -> int1: the reseda is not a quarrel and it is not a Rastafarianism.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the carrageenin is migratory.; sent16 -> int3: the carrageenin is not migratory if the fact that it is migratory and it does not solemnize tumor is incorrect.; sent11 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the carrageenin is migratory thing that does not solemnize tumor is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the carrageenin is not migratory.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__