the transamination is not non-calcaneal.
sent1: the transamination is both not a peahen and vacuolate if the wallow is not a peahen. sent2: the fact that the educator is a twenty and it is hexadecimal does not hold. sent3: the coelostat is a kind of an isthmus if the fact that the wallop is not a neck is right. sent4: that if the bloomers is a Tarkovsky then the wallow is a kind of a self-starter is not wrong. sent5: the wallow treats dimity and it is a kind of a Omani if that it is not mutagenic hold. sent6: if the wallow is both a self-starter and Omani it is not a peahen. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a peahen is vacuolate that it is not calcaneal is right. sent8: the bloomers is a kind of a Tarkovsky if the coelostat is a kind of an isthmus. sent9: the wallow is not mutagenic. sent10: the wallop is not a kind of a neck if the fact that the educator is a twenty and is hexadecimal is not correct. sent11: if the educator is calcaneal the transamination is calcaneal.
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the wallop is not a kind of a neck.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the coelostat is an isthmus.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the bloomers is a Tarkovsky.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the wallow is a self-starter.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the wallow does treat dimity and is a Omani.; int5 -> int6: the wallow is a Omani.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the wallow is both a self-starter and Omani.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the wallow is not a kind of a peahen.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the transamination is not a kind of a peahen and is vacuolate.; sent7 -> int10: the transamination is not calcaneal if it is not a peahen and it is vacuolate.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the transamination is calcaneal.
$hypothesis$ = the transamination is not non-calcaneal. ; $context$ = sent1: the transamination is both not a peahen and vacuolate if the wallow is not a peahen. sent2: the fact that the educator is a twenty and it is hexadecimal does not hold. sent3: the coelostat is a kind of an isthmus if the fact that the wallop is not a neck is right. sent4: that if the bloomers is a Tarkovsky then the wallow is a kind of a self-starter is not wrong. sent5: the wallow treats dimity and it is a kind of a Omani if that it is not mutagenic hold. sent6: if the wallow is both a self-starter and Omani it is not a peahen. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a peahen is vacuolate that it is not calcaneal is right. sent8: the bloomers is a kind of a Tarkovsky if the coelostat is a kind of an isthmus. sent9: the wallow is not mutagenic. sent10: the wallop is not a kind of a neck if the fact that the educator is a twenty and is hexadecimal is not correct. sent11: if the educator is calcaneal the transamination is calcaneal. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the wallop is not a kind of a neck.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the coelostat is an isthmus.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the bloomers is a Tarkovsky.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the wallow is a self-starter.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the wallow does treat dimity and is a Omani.; int5 -> int6: the wallow is a Omani.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the wallow is both a self-starter and Omani.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the wallow is not a kind of a peahen.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the transamination is not a kind of a peahen and is vacuolate.; sent7 -> int10: the transamination is not calcaneal if it is not a peahen and it is vacuolate.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__