not the exacerbating Burberry but the bestowal occurs.
sent1: the vaunt does not occur if that the vaunt happens and the exacerbating Burberry occurs is not true. sent2: the non-bovineness is brought about by that the commercialization and/or the vaunt occurs. sent3: the fraternization does not occur. sent4: the capillarity occurs. sent5: the non-carinalness triggers that the misdealing occurs. sent6: if the updating does not occur not the ravage but the impropriety happens. sent7: the exacerbating Marat does not occur if the adventitialness happens. sent8: if the nonhumanness does not occur the bovineness happens. sent9: the fringe does not occur if that the fringe occurs and the bovineness happens is wrong. sent10: not the exacerbating Burberry but the bestowal occurs if the commercialization does not occur. sent11: the nonhumanness does not occur. sent12: if that the tenderness does not occur is correct the fenestration does not occur and the pilosebaceousness occurs. sent13: the fraternization happens if the fact that the nestling does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: if the neurophysiologicalness occurs the bestowal does not occur and the nonhumanness happens. sent15: that both the fringing and the bovineness occurs is not right if the bestowal does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the commercialization happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the commercialization or the vaunt or both occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the bovine does not occur.; sent8 & sent11 -> int3: the bovine occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the commercialization does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that not the exacerbating Burberry but the bestowal occurs is wrong.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = not the exacerbating Burberry but the bestowal occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the vaunt does not occur if that the vaunt happens and the exacerbating Burberry occurs is not true. sent2: the non-bovineness is brought about by that the commercialization and/or the vaunt occurs. sent3: the fraternization does not occur. sent4: the capillarity occurs. sent5: the non-carinalness triggers that the misdealing occurs. sent6: if the updating does not occur not the ravage but the impropriety happens. sent7: the exacerbating Marat does not occur if the adventitialness happens. sent8: if the nonhumanness does not occur the bovineness happens. sent9: the fringe does not occur if that the fringe occurs and the bovineness happens is wrong. sent10: not the exacerbating Burberry but the bestowal occurs if the commercialization does not occur. sent11: the nonhumanness does not occur. sent12: if that the tenderness does not occur is correct the fenestration does not occur and the pilosebaceousness occurs. sent13: the fraternization happens if the fact that the nestling does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: if the neurophysiologicalness occurs the bestowal does not occur and the nonhumanness happens. sent15: that both the fringing and the bovineness occurs is not right if the bestowal does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the commercialization happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the commercialization or the vaunt or both occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the bovine does not occur.; sent8 & sent11 -> int3: the bovine occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the commercialization does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__