the fact that the succession is not a kind of a megagametophyte or it is a dewdrop or both is wrong.
sent1: something is a oxyphencyclimine and is not a knight if it is a kind of a effacement. sent2: if the handset is not a kind of a megagametophyte then the succession either is not a megagametophyte or is a kind of a dewdrop or both. sent3: the Diegueno is not a kind of a megagametophyte. sent4: if the fact that something is not a kind of a stepson hold then the fact that it is either not a megagametophyte or a dewdrop or both does not hold. sent5: if something transits it is a effacement. sent6: if something does not relace dowse it is not a stepson. sent7: something does not relace dowse if it is a oxyphencyclimine and it is not a knight. sent8: if the succession is uncial then it does not unify. sent9: the frostiness does not relace dowse and/or it is a vagrancy. sent10: the succession is not a Freudian. sent11: if the frostiness is not a stepson the handset is not a megagametophyte. sent12: if the succession is non-Freudian then it is a uncial and does not prod succession. sent13: something does transit and/or it housekeeps follow-on if the fact that it does not unify hold. sent14: the frostiness is not a stepson.
sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the handset is not a megagametophyte.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;
that the succession is not a megagametophyte and/or it is a dewdrop is false.
sent4 -> int2: that the succession is not a megagametophyte or it is a kind of a dewdrop or both does not hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a stepson hold.; sent6 -> int3: if the succession does not relace dowse it is not a stepson.; sent7 -> int4: the succession does not relace dowse if it is a kind of a oxyphencyclimine and is not a kind of a knight.; sent1 -> int5: the succession is a oxyphencyclimine but it does not knight if it is a effacement.; sent13 -> int6: if the succession does not unify then either it transits or it housekeeps follow-on or both.; sent12 & sent10 -> int7: the succession is a uncial but it does not prod succession.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the succession is a uncial is true.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the succession does not unify.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the succession does transit or it housekeeps follow-on or both.; sent5 -> int11: if the succession transits then it is a effacement.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the succession is not a kind of a megagametophyte or it is a dewdrop or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a oxyphencyclimine and is not a knight if it is a kind of a effacement. sent2: if the handset is not a kind of a megagametophyte then the succession either is not a megagametophyte or is a kind of a dewdrop or both. sent3: the Diegueno is not a kind of a megagametophyte. sent4: if the fact that something is not a kind of a stepson hold then the fact that it is either not a megagametophyte or a dewdrop or both does not hold. sent5: if something transits it is a effacement. sent6: if something does not relace dowse it is not a stepson. sent7: something does not relace dowse if it is a oxyphencyclimine and it is not a knight. sent8: if the succession is uncial then it does not unify. sent9: the frostiness does not relace dowse and/or it is a vagrancy. sent10: the succession is not a Freudian. sent11: if the frostiness is not a stepson the handset is not a megagametophyte. sent12: if the succession is non-Freudian then it is a uncial and does not prod succession. sent13: something does transit and/or it housekeeps follow-on if the fact that it does not unify hold. sent14: the frostiness is not a stepson. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the handset is not a megagametophyte.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__