the gangrene does not dive areaway.
sent1: that the gangrene is a obtuseness is not false. sent2: if there is something such that it does not fulminate the flotsam is intergalactic and aromatic. sent3: if the Turk's-cap is not nonclassical and it is not contemptible that the flotsam does not dive brush-off hold. sent4: the Turk's-cap is not nonclassical and is not contemptible. sent5: something is a Machiavellianism if that it is Mishnaic and it does not distill is incorrect. sent6: the gangrene is a kind of a cinchonine. sent7: the vapor is Mishnaic. sent8: the guardrail is a Yale. sent9: the harvester distills. sent10: that if something does not dive brush-off then that it is a kind of Mishnaic thing that does not distill is not correct is not incorrect. sent11: the vapor is not a fulminate if either the gangrene does not dive Wolf or it is a Yale or both. sent12: the vapor is a kind of a Machiavellianism and does distill. sent13: if something is a Yale then the gangrene does not dive Wolf or it is a Yale or both. sent14: if something is a Machiavellianism that it does dive areaway is correct. sent15: if the vapor is a kind of a Machiavellianism the gangrene dives areaway and is not Mishnaic.
sent12 -> int1: the vapor is a Machiavellianism.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: that the gangrene does dive areaway and is not Mishnaic is true.; int2 -> hypothesis;
the flotsam does dive areaway and it is aromatic.
sent14 -> int3: if the flotsam is a Machiavellianism then it does dive areaway.; sent5 -> int4: if that the flotsam is Mishnaic but it does not distill does not hold then it is a Machiavellianism.; sent10 -> int5: the fact that if the flotsam does not dive brush-off then that the flotsam is Mishnaic and does not distill is not correct is not false.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the flotsam does not dive brush-off.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the flotsam is Mishnaic but it does not distill does not hold.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the flotsam is a Machiavellianism.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the flotsam dives areaway.; sent8 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a Yale.; int10 & sent13 -> int11: the gangrene does not dive Wolf or is a Yale or both.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the vapor is not a fulminate is correct.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a fulminate is right.; int13 & sent2 -> int14: the flotsam is intergalactic and it is aromatic.; int14 -> int15: the flotsam is aromatic.; int9 & int15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the gangrene does not dive areaway. ; $context$ = sent1: that the gangrene is a obtuseness is not false. sent2: if there is something such that it does not fulminate the flotsam is intergalactic and aromatic. sent3: if the Turk's-cap is not nonclassical and it is not contemptible that the flotsam does not dive brush-off hold. sent4: the Turk's-cap is not nonclassical and is not contemptible. sent5: something is a Machiavellianism if that it is Mishnaic and it does not distill is incorrect. sent6: the gangrene is a kind of a cinchonine. sent7: the vapor is Mishnaic. sent8: the guardrail is a Yale. sent9: the harvester distills. sent10: that if something does not dive brush-off then that it is a kind of Mishnaic thing that does not distill is not correct is not incorrect. sent11: the vapor is not a fulminate if either the gangrene does not dive Wolf or it is a Yale or both. sent12: the vapor is a kind of a Machiavellianism and does distill. sent13: if something is a Yale then the gangrene does not dive Wolf or it is a Yale or both. sent14: if something is a Machiavellianism that it does dive areaway is correct. sent15: if the vapor is a kind of a Machiavellianism the gangrene dives areaway and is not Mishnaic. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the vapor is a Machiavellianism.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: that the gangrene does dive areaway and is not Mishnaic is true.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__