the fact that the loaner is foliate and it is not adequate is wrong.
sent1: if the monotreme does not entrance whisper then it does not drum and it does scallop gentamicin. sent2: the horn is not a kind of a Athenian. sent3: the loaner foliates if there exists something such that that it is a Spark and/or it does not entrance whisper is not true. sent4: if something is not a drum then the loaner is unequal. sent5: the broadloom is a kind of a drum if the monotreme does scallop gentamicin. sent6: if the monotreme is unequal the loaner does not scallop gentamicin. sent7: if the monotreme is unequal and does defray dainty the Drambuie is unequal. sent8: the monotreme is a Spark but not a ignorantness if it is not a conductor. sent9: there exists something such that it is not editorial. sent10: the monotreme is a Spark and/or it is a supercargo. sent11: if something that is a Spark is not a kind of a ignorantness it does not entrance whisper. sent12: either something is a kind of a Spark or it does not entrance whisper or both. sent13: there is something such that it is not a Spark. sent14: that if the Drambuie is not a supercargo the monotreme scallops gentamicin and/or it is a kind of a supercargo is correct. sent15: that the cyanogen is unequal and/or it does not entrance whisper is wrong. sent16: the Drambuie is not a supercargo if something defrays dainty. sent17: the fact that the cyanogen scallops gentamicin and/or it does not entrance whisper is wrong. sent18: the broadloom is not a drum if the monotreme does scallop gentamicin. sent19: the cyanogen does entrance whisper. sent20: the fact that the loaner entrances whisper is correct if there is something such that it is not unequal. sent21: that the broadloom does scallop gentamicin is correct. sent22: that the cyanogen is a kind of a Spark and/or it does not entrance whisper is not right. sent23: if the fact that the monotreme is a kind of a supercargo hold the broadloom is not a drum. sent24: there is something such that that it does defray dainty is not false. sent25: the monotreme is not a supercargo if it does not drum and does scallop gentamicin.
sent24 & sent16 -> int1: the Drambuie is not a supercargo.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the monotreme does scallop gentamicin and/or is a kind of a supercargo.; int2 & sent18 & sent23 -> int3: the broadloom is not a drum.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is not a kind of a drum.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the loaner is unequal.; sent22 -> int6: there is something such that that it is a Spark and/or it does not entrance whisper is false.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the loaner foliates.; int5 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the loaner does foliate and it is unequal is incorrect.
sent11 -> int8: the monotreme does not entrance whisper if it is a Spark and it is not a kind of a ignorantness.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the loaner is foliate and it is not adequate is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the monotreme does not entrance whisper then it does not drum and it does scallop gentamicin. sent2: the horn is not a kind of a Athenian. sent3: the loaner foliates if there exists something such that that it is a Spark and/or it does not entrance whisper is not true. sent4: if something is not a drum then the loaner is unequal. sent5: the broadloom is a kind of a drum if the monotreme does scallop gentamicin. sent6: if the monotreme is unequal the loaner does not scallop gentamicin. sent7: if the monotreme is unequal and does defray dainty the Drambuie is unequal. sent8: the monotreme is a Spark but not a ignorantness if it is not a conductor. sent9: there exists something such that it is not editorial. sent10: the monotreme is a Spark and/or it is a supercargo. sent11: if something that is a Spark is not a kind of a ignorantness it does not entrance whisper. sent12: either something is a kind of a Spark or it does not entrance whisper or both. sent13: there is something such that it is not a Spark. sent14: that if the Drambuie is not a supercargo the monotreme scallops gentamicin and/or it is a kind of a supercargo is correct. sent15: that the cyanogen is unequal and/or it does not entrance whisper is wrong. sent16: the Drambuie is not a supercargo if something defrays dainty. sent17: the fact that the cyanogen scallops gentamicin and/or it does not entrance whisper is wrong. sent18: the broadloom is not a drum if the monotreme does scallop gentamicin. sent19: the cyanogen does entrance whisper. sent20: the fact that the loaner entrances whisper is correct if there is something such that it is not unequal. sent21: that the broadloom does scallop gentamicin is correct. sent22: that the cyanogen is a kind of a Spark and/or it does not entrance whisper is not right. sent23: if the fact that the monotreme is a kind of a supercargo hold the broadloom is not a drum. sent24: there is something such that that it does defray dainty is not false. sent25: the monotreme is not a supercargo if it does not drum and does scallop gentamicin. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent16 -> int1: the Drambuie is not a supercargo.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the monotreme does scallop gentamicin and/or is a kind of a supercargo.; int2 & sent18 & sent23 -> int3: the broadloom is not a drum.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is not a kind of a drum.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the loaner is unequal.; sent22 -> int6: there is something such that that it is a Spark and/or it does not entrance whisper is false.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the loaner foliates.; int5 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__