the fact that the savoy is both not a jet and not a doctorfish is not right.
sent1: the daylily is not an armiger and it is not a fire-bush if the shipbuilder is not a fire-bush. sent2: the fiefdom is corvine and/or is not a kind of a Inca. sent3: that the fiefdom does glaze deism and/or it is a nectar is not correct if it is not a Walesa. sent4: if the jackknife-fish is not a nectar then the daylily is an armiger and is a Inca. sent5: if something is not corvine then that it is not a voyage or it is a Clive or both is not correct. sent6: if the fiefdom either is corvine or is not a Inca or both then the electrolytic is not corvine. sent7: the fact that the Venezuelan is not a kind of a Walesa and it does not arrogate is incorrect if it does not yawn. sent8: the jackknife-fish is not a kind of a nectar if the fact that the fiefdom does glaze deism and/or it is a nectar does not hold. sent9: the fiefdom is not a kind of a Walesa if that the Venezuelan is not a Walesa and it does not arrogate is incorrect. sent10: that the savoy does not jet and is not a kind of a doctorfish does not hold if the jackknife-fish is not a jet. sent11: something is not a kind of a jet and is not a doctorfish if it is non-corvine. sent12: the jackknife-fish is not a jet if something that is not a kind of an armiger is not a kind of a fire-bush.
sent5 -> int1: that that the electrolytic does not voyage and/or is the Clive does not hold if the electrolytic is non-corvine hold.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the electrolytic is not corvine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the electrolytic does not voyage or it is a Clive or both is incorrect.;
the savoy does not jet and it is not a doctorfish.
sent11 -> int4: if the savoy is not corvine it is not a jet and it is not a doctorfish.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the savoy is both not a jet and not a doctorfish is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the daylily is not an armiger and it is not a fire-bush if the shipbuilder is not a fire-bush. sent2: the fiefdom is corvine and/or is not a kind of a Inca. sent3: that the fiefdom does glaze deism and/or it is a nectar is not correct if it is not a Walesa. sent4: if the jackknife-fish is not a nectar then the daylily is an armiger and is a Inca. sent5: if something is not corvine then that it is not a voyage or it is a Clive or both is not correct. sent6: if the fiefdom either is corvine or is not a Inca or both then the electrolytic is not corvine. sent7: the fact that the Venezuelan is not a kind of a Walesa and it does not arrogate is incorrect if it does not yawn. sent8: the jackknife-fish is not a kind of a nectar if the fact that the fiefdom does glaze deism and/or it is a nectar does not hold. sent9: the fiefdom is not a kind of a Walesa if that the Venezuelan is not a Walesa and it does not arrogate is incorrect. sent10: that the savoy does not jet and is not a kind of a doctorfish does not hold if the jackknife-fish is not a jet. sent11: something is not a kind of a jet and is not a doctorfish if it is non-corvine. sent12: the jackknife-fish is not a jet if something that is not a kind of an armiger is not a kind of a fire-bush. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that that the electrolytic does not voyage and/or is the Clive does not hold if the electrolytic is non-corvine hold.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the electrolytic is not corvine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the electrolytic does not voyage or it is a Clive or both is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__