the fact that that the pepperwood does rede tanner and/or it is inflectional does not hold hold.
sent1: an extrinsic thing does invest. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a mush that is a peripheral is not true the fact that the swathe is extrinsic is not incorrect. sent3: the pepperwood is not non-extrinsic. sent4: something is an earthwork and it does invest. sent5: that the pepperwood does invest hold if the swathe redes tanner. sent6: there exists something such that that it mushes and is not non-peripheral is not right. sent7: the hit redes tanner. sent8: there exists something such that it does invest and is inflectional. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is an earthwork and is extrinsic does not hold the tanner invests. sent10: the pepperwood is an earthwork or it does rede tanner or both. sent11: the tanner is not aromatic if there is something such that the fact that it is prolusory and it does fret submission is incorrect. sent12: if there exists something such that it does sedate that the swathe is a springboard is correct. sent13: the Mills does not fret sprocket. sent14: that something does rede tanner and/or it is not non-inflectional is not correct if it is not extrinsic. sent15: if something is a springboard that it is an earthwork and it does not invest is false. sent16: the fact that the aba is prolusory thing that does fret submission is not correct if the Mills does not fret sprocket. sent17: the pepperwood does invest if there exists something such that that it is inflectional and it redes tanner is incorrect. sent18: if the swathe does invest the tanner is a kind of an earthwork. sent19: the pepperwood is a kind of an earthwork. sent20: if the tanner is an earthwork the pepperwood does rede tanner. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is inflectional and it redes tanner is false. sent22: the fact that the pepperwood is aoristic is correct. sent23: something is kind thing that sedates if it is not aromatic.
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the swathe is extrinsic.; sent1 -> int2: if the swathe is extrinsic that it invests is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the swathe does invest.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the tanner is an earthwork.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the pepperwood redes tanner.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that that the pepperwood does rede tanner or it is inflectional or both is not true is correct.
sent14 -> int6: that the fact that the pepperwood redes tanner and/or it is inflectional is not right if the pepperwood is not extrinsic is true.; sent15 -> int7: the fact that the swathe is an earthwork but it does not invest is not right if it is a springboard.; sent23 -> int8: if the tanner is not aromatic it is kind and does sedate.; sent16 & sent13 -> int9: the fact that the aba is prolusory thing that frets submission is not correct.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is prolusory and it frets submission is not right.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the tanner is not aromatic.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the tanner is a kind of a kind and sedates.; int12 -> int13: the tanner sedates.; int13 -> int14: something does sedate.; int14 & sent12 -> int15: the swathe is a springboard.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the swathe is a kind of an earthwork that does not invest does not hold.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it is an earthwork and does not invest is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the pepperwood does rede tanner and/or it is inflectional does not hold hold. ; $context$ = sent1: an extrinsic thing does invest. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a mush that is a peripheral is not true the fact that the swathe is extrinsic is not incorrect. sent3: the pepperwood is not non-extrinsic. sent4: something is an earthwork and it does invest. sent5: that the pepperwood does invest hold if the swathe redes tanner. sent6: there exists something such that that it mushes and is not non-peripheral is not right. sent7: the hit redes tanner. sent8: there exists something such that it does invest and is inflectional. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is an earthwork and is extrinsic does not hold the tanner invests. sent10: the pepperwood is an earthwork or it does rede tanner or both. sent11: the tanner is not aromatic if there is something such that the fact that it is prolusory and it does fret submission is incorrect. sent12: if there exists something such that it does sedate that the swathe is a springboard is correct. sent13: the Mills does not fret sprocket. sent14: that something does rede tanner and/or it is not non-inflectional is not correct if it is not extrinsic. sent15: if something is a springboard that it is an earthwork and it does not invest is false. sent16: the fact that the aba is prolusory thing that does fret submission is not correct if the Mills does not fret sprocket. sent17: the pepperwood does invest if there exists something such that that it is inflectional and it redes tanner is incorrect. sent18: if the swathe does invest the tanner is a kind of an earthwork. sent19: the pepperwood is a kind of an earthwork. sent20: if the tanner is an earthwork the pepperwood does rede tanner. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is inflectional and it redes tanner is false. sent22: the fact that the pepperwood is aoristic is correct. sent23: something is kind thing that sedates if it is not aromatic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the swathe is extrinsic.; sent1 -> int2: if the swathe is extrinsic that it invests is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the swathe does invest.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the tanner is an earthwork.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the pepperwood redes tanner.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__