the fact that the hart does inflate bit and it overturns UTC is false.
sent1: if that the U does not overturn UTC but it does inflate bit is wrong the hart is not a contingent. sent2: the U does inflate bit. sent3: the U is not etiological if the fact that the hart does not overturn UTC and is detachable does not hold. sent4: that the U does not overturn UTC and is a contingent is incorrect. sent5: the U is not eremitic. sent6: there exists something such that it is detachable. sent7: there is something such that that it is a kind of a DO and/or is an angelfish does not hold. sent8: if the styrene does not average saltshaker the fact that the agamete is a lexicalization or not a love or both does not hold. sent9: that the oregano is not an angelfish is not wrong if the fact that the agamete is a lexicalization and/or not a love does not hold. sent10: the hart is a kind of a Seth. sent11: the saltshaker is not etiological if the U is not detachable. sent12: if something that is not a contingent is detachable the hart does inflate bit. sent13: the U is detachable. sent14: that the saltshaker is not etiological is correct if the fact that the U is not a kind of a contingent but it is detachable is not correct. sent15: the hart does average then. sent16: the saltshaker is etiological. sent17: that something is not a contingent is not wrong. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a DO is not incorrect. sent19: the brae is a kind of a contingent. sent20: something is a DO and/or it is not an angelfish. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a DO or it is not an angelfish or both is not true then the hart overturns UTC. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that either it is a DO or it is not an angelfish or both is wrong. sent23: there exists something such that it is an angelfish. sent24: there exists something such that it is a kind of a contingent that is detachable. sent25: the styrene does not average saltshaker.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the U is not a contingent but it is not non-detachable does not hold.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the saltshaker is not etiological.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the U is not a contingent but it is detachable.; int3 -> int4: something is not a contingent but it is detachable.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the hart does inflate bit.; sent22 & sent21 -> int6: the hart does overturn UTC.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that that the hart inflates bit and it overturns UTC is true is false.
sent8 & sent25 -> int7: that either the agamete is a lexicalization or it is not a kind of a love or both is not right.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the oregano is not an angelfish.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that the fact that it is not an angelfish is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hart does inflate bit and it overturns UTC is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the U does not overturn UTC but it does inflate bit is wrong the hart is not a contingent. sent2: the U does inflate bit. sent3: the U is not etiological if the fact that the hart does not overturn UTC and is detachable does not hold. sent4: that the U does not overturn UTC and is a contingent is incorrect. sent5: the U is not eremitic. sent6: there exists something such that it is detachable. sent7: there is something such that that it is a kind of a DO and/or is an angelfish does not hold. sent8: if the styrene does not average saltshaker the fact that the agamete is a lexicalization or not a love or both does not hold. sent9: that the oregano is not an angelfish is not wrong if the fact that the agamete is a lexicalization and/or not a love does not hold. sent10: the hart is a kind of a Seth. sent11: the saltshaker is not etiological if the U is not detachable. sent12: if something that is not a contingent is detachable the hart does inflate bit. sent13: the U is detachable. sent14: that the saltshaker is not etiological is correct if the fact that the U is not a kind of a contingent but it is detachable is not correct. sent15: the hart does average then. sent16: the saltshaker is etiological. sent17: that something is not a contingent is not wrong. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a DO is not incorrect. sent19: the brae is a kind of a contingent. sent20: something is a DO and/or it is not an angelfish. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a DO or it is not an angelfish or both is not true then the hart overturns UTC. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that either it is a DO or it is not an angelfish or both is wrong. sent23: there exists something such that it is an angelfish. sent24: there exists something such that it is a kind of a contingent that is detachable. sent25: the styrene does not average saltshaker. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the U is not a contingent but it is not non-detachable does not hold.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the saltshaker is not etiological.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the U is not a contingent but it is detachable.; int3 -> int4: something is not a contingent but it is detachable.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the hart does inflate bit.; sent22 & sent21 -> int6: the hart does overturn UTC.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__