there is something such that if that it does ablate and is not a lastingness is incorrect then it deposes luxuriation.
sent1: if that something is a skater but it is not bolographic is not true then it is precise. sent2: the fact that the fairlead deposes luxuriation hold if it is a lastingness. sent3: something deposes luxuriation if the fact that it ablates and is not a lastingness is not true. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it does ablate and it is a lastingness is not correct it deposes luxuriation. sent5: if that something approbates convener but it does not cloy fairlead is false then it is dumpy. sent6: there exists something such that if it ablates and it is not a kind of a lastingness then it deposes luxuriation. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is bolographic and it is unprotective is not right it is a claret. sent8: the convener does ablate if it is atrial and is not redemptive. sent9: that there is something such that if it does not ablate then the fact that it does depose luxuriation is correct is not wrong. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is a skater and does not approbate crosse is not true then it is a kind of a Purim. sent11: something that does ablate and is not a lastingness deposes luxuriation.
sent3 -> int1: the fairlead deposes luxuriation if that the fact that it ablates and it is not a lastingness is not false does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does ablate and is not a lastingness is incorrect then it deposes luxuriation. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a skater but it is not bolographic is not true then it is precise. sent2: the fact that the fairlead deposes luxuriation hold if it is a lastingness. sent3: something deposes luxuriation if the fact that it ablates and is not a lastingness is not true. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it does ablate and it is a lastingness is not correct it deposes luxuriation. sent5: if that something approbates convener but it does not cloy fairlead is false then it is dumpy. sent6: there exists something such that if it ablates and it is not a kind of a lastingness then it deposes luxuriation. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is bolographic and it is unprotective is not right it is a claret. sent8: the convener does ablate if it is atrial and is not redemptive. sent9: that there is something such that if it does not ablate then the fact that it does depose luxuriation is correct is not wrong. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is a skater and does not approbate crosse is not true then it is a kind of a Purim. sent11: something that does ablate and is not a lastingness deposes luxuriation. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fairlead deposes luxuriation if that the fact that it ablates and it is not a lastingness is not false does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__