the brisance scales toaster.
sent1: if something that is a Gould is not inconclusive that it does not scale toaster is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it is a lecherousness and it is not conclusive. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is a lecherousness and it is not conclusive does not hold then the brisance is conclusive. sent4: the brisance is a casualness and it is a Gould. sent5: there is something such that that it is a lecherousness that is inconclusive is not right.
sent4 -> int1: the brisance is a Gould.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the brisance is conclusive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the brisance is a kind of a Gould and is conclusive.; sent1 -> int4: that the brisance does not scale toaster is not wrong if the fact that it is a Gould and it is not inconclusive hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the brisance scales toaster. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is a Gould is not inconclusive that it does not scale toaster is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it is a lecherousness and it is not conclusive. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is a lecherousness and it is not conclusive does not hold then the brisance is conclusive. sent4: the brisance is a casualness and it is a Gould. sent5: there is something such that that it is a lecherousness that is inconclusive is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the brisance is a Gould.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the brisance is conclusive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the brisance is a kind of a Gould and is conclusive.; sent1 -> int4: that the brisance does not scale toaster is not wrong if the fact that it is a Gould and it is not inconclusive hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__