the fact that there is something such that if it does not hitch DMZ and is sanitary it does not thirst asphyxia is incorrect.
sent1: something that does not unyoke and does thirst Taliban is not a Portuguese. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a counterclaim and is an afternoon then it is a vacation hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not hitch DMZ and is sanitary then it does thirst asphyxia. sent4: the kingcup does not thirst asphyxia if it does not hitch DMZ and it is sanitary. sent5: the kingcup thirsts asphyxia if it does not hitch DMZ and it is sanitary.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not unyoke and thirsts Taliban then it is not a Portuguese.
sent1 -> int1: if the infiltration does not unyoke but it does thirst Taliban it is not a Portuguese.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not hitch DMZ and is sanitary it does not thirst asphyxia is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not unyoke and does thirst Taliban is not a Portuguese. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a counterclaim and is an afternoon then it is a vacation hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not hitch DMZ and is sanitary then it does thirst asphyxia. sent4: the kingcup does not thirst asphyxia if it does not hitch DMZ and it is sanitary. sent5: the kingcup thirsts asphyxia if it does not hitch DMZ and it is sanitary. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__