the rat-catcher is not a beep and it does not instruct plane.
sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a spectrum but it does not ramble means is incorrect if it is a history. sent2: the housemother is not a kind of a spectrum if there exists something such that the fact that it is a spectrum and does not ramble means does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is palmar the rat-catcher is not a kind of a beep. sent4: the fact that something is communicative and a buoyancy is not correct if it is not a kind of a spectrum. sent5: if the rat-catcher is Demosthenic the fact that it is not a beep and it is palmar is false. sent6: if the rat-catcher is not non-bituminoid but it does not instruct Oedogonium it is Demosthenic. sent7: that the vespid is palmar hold. sent8: if there exists something such that it is subdural then the Ahuehuete does axe imposition and it is climactic. sent9: if something is not palmar that it does not beep and it does not instruct plane is not correct. sent10: if the fact that something is not bituminoid and it does not instruct Oedogonium is not true then it is Demosthenic. sent11: the rat-catcher is not a beep. sent12: the Wave is not a beep. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is palmar is correct the rat-catcher is not a beep and it does not instruct plane. sent14: if the fact that the robe is not a kind of a Scolymus and rambles Merrimack is wrong then the stitch is subdural. sent15: there is something such that it does ramble verdin. sent16: if something axes imposition it is a history. sent17: the vespid does beep. sent18: the fact that the robe is not a Scolymus but it does ramble Merrimack is not true. sent19: the fact that something is not bituminoid and does not instruct Oedogonium is not true if it is not a kind of a buoyancy. sent20: if that something is a kind of communicative a buoyancy is wrong it is not a buoyancy. sent21: the vespid is an iconography.
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that it is palmar.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rat-catcher is not a beep and it does not instruct plane is wrong.
sent9 -> int2: if the rat-catcher is not palmar that it is not a beep and it does not instruct plane does not hold.; sent10 -> int3: the housemother is Demosthenic if that it is not bituminoid and does not instruct Oedogonium is not correct.; sent19 -> int4: the fact that the housemother is not bituminoid and it does not instruct Oedogonium does not hold if it is not a buoyancy.; sent20 -> int5: the housemother is not a buoyancy if that it is communicative and a buoyancy does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: if the housemother is not a kind of a spectrum then that it is communicative and is a buoyancy is not right.; sent1 -> int7: if the fact that the Ahuehuete is a history is correct the fact that it is a kind of a spectrum that does not ramble means is wrong.; sent16 -> int8: the Ahuehuete is a kind of a history if it does axe imposition.; sent14 & sent18 -> int9: the stitch is subdural.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is subdural.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the Ahuehuete axes imposition and it is climactic.; int11 -> int12: that the Ahuehuete axes imposition is true.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the Ahuehuete is a kind of a history.; int7 & int13 -> int14: that the Ahuehuete is a kind of a spectrum but it does not ramble means does not hold.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it is a spectrum and it does not ramble means is not right.; int15 & sent2 -> int16: the housemother is not a spectrum.; int6 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the housemother is communicative thing that is a buoyancy does not hold.; int5 & int17 -> int18: the housemother is not a buoyancy.; int4 & int18 -> int19: that the housemother is not bituminoid and does not instruct Oedogonium is false.; int3 & int19 -> int20: the housemother is Demosthenic.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that it is not non-Demosthenic.;
$hypothesis$ = the rat-catcher is not a beep and it does not instruct plane. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a spectrum but it does not ramble means is incorrect if it is a history. sent2: the housemother is not a kind of a spectrum if there exists something such that the fact that it is a spectrum and does not ramble means does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is palmar the rat-catcher is not a kind of a beep. sent4: the fact that something is communicative and a buoyancy is not correct if it is not a kind of a spectrum. sent5: if the rat-catcher is Demosthenic the fact that it is not a beep and it is palmar is false. sent6: if the rat-catcher is not non-bituminoid but it does not instruct Oedogonium it is Demosthenic. sent7: that the vespid is palmar hold. sent8: if there exists something such that it is subdural then the Ahuehuete does axe imposition and it is climactic. sent9: if something is not palmar that it does not beep and it does not instruct plane is not correct. sent10: if the fact that something is not bituminoid and it does not instruct Oedogonium is not true then it is Demosthenic. sent11: the rat-catcher is not a beep. sent12: the Wave is not a beep. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is palmar is correct the rat-catcher is not a beep and it does not instruct plane. sent14: if the fact that the robe is not a kind of a Scolymus and rambles Merrimack is wrong then the stitch is subdural. sent15: there is something such that it does ramble verdin. sent16: if something axes imposition it is a history. sent17: the vespid does beep. sent18: the fact that the robe is not a Scolymus but it does ramble Merrimack is not true. sent19: the fact that something is not bituminoid and does not instruct Oedogonium is not true if it is not a kind of a buoyancy. sent20: if that something is a kind of communicative a buoyancy is wrong it is not a buoyancy. sent21: the vespid is an iconography. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that it is palmar.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__