the tiramisu either is not a kind of a yellow or is a Lemaireocereus or both.
sent1: the Fang is not acceptive if it does trip perfumed. sent2: the fact that if the Fang is not acceptive the fact that the wrongdoer is a styracosaur but it is not acceptive does not hold hold. sent3: the fact that the tiramisu does not yellow or it is a Lemaireocereus or both is wrong if there is something such that it does not trip perfumed. sent4: the wrongdoer is murine. sent5: something is a crust if the fact that it is a styracosaur that is not acceptive is wrong. sent6: a murine is both not a crust and a Gordimer. sent7: if the fact that the tiramisu does not trip perfumed hold then it is not a yellow and/or is a kind of a Lemaireocereus. sent8: that the wrongdoer is a styracosaur and acceptive is not true if the fact that the Fang is not acceptive is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Fang trips perfumed is not wrong.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Fang is non-acceptive.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the wrongdoer is a styracosaur but it is not acceptive is not true.; sent5 -> int3: if that the wrongdoer is a styracosaur and is not acceptive does not hold it does crust.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the wrongdoer does crust.; sent6 -> int5: the wrongdoer is not a crust and is a Gordimer if it is a murine.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the wrongdoer is both not a crust and a Gordimer.; int6 -> int7: the wrongdoer is not a crust.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Fang does not trip perfumed.; int9 -> int10: something does not trip perfumed.; int10 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the tiramisu is not a yellow or it is a Lemaireocereus or both.
$hypothesis$ = the tiramisu either is not a kind of a yellow or is a Lemaireocereus or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the Fang is not acceptive if it does trip perfumed. sent2: the fact that if the Fang is not acceptive the fact that the wrongdoer is a styracosaur but it is not acceptive does not hold hold. sent3: the fact that the tiramisu does not yellow or it is a Lemaireocereus or both is wrong if there is something such that it does not trip perfumed. sent4: the wrongdoer is murine. sent5: something is a crust if the fact that it is a styracosaur that is not acceptive is wrong. sent6: a murine is both not a crust and a Gordimer. sent7: if the fact that the tiramisu does not trip perfumed hold then it is not a yellow and/or is a kind of a Lemaireocereus. sent8: that the wrongdoer is a styracosaur and acceptive is not true if the fact that the Fang is not acceptive is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Fang trips perfumed is not wrong.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Fang is non-acceptive.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the wrongdoer is a styracosaur but it is not acceptive is not true.; sent5 -> int3: if that the wrongdoer is a styracosaur and is not acceptive does not hold it does crust.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the wrongdoer does crust.; sent6 -> int5: the wrongdoer is not a crust and is a Gordimer if it is a murine.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the wrongdoer is both not a crust and a Gordimer.; int6 -> int7: the wrongdoer is not a crust.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Fang does not trip perfumed.; int9 -> int10: something does not trip perfumed.; int10 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__