the reboxetine is a pluck that is a peekaboo.
sent1: there is something such that it homesteads mandate. sent2: the alp completes and it is a kind of a calumet. sent3: the fact that the alp is a hemagglutination if something that is not a kind of a Washingtonian is not frivolous hold. sent4: the mandate is a chaplain and it is argentic. sent5: the transudate is not frivolous. sent6: everything is not a Washingtonian and it is not frivolous. sent7: the alp is a peekaboo if the reboxetine is a gorgerin. sent8: the reboxetine is not a kind of a fortification and is not barographic. sent9: everything is not frivolous. sent10: something is a pluck if it is not a kind of an antique or it is not a hemagglutination or both. sent11: the alp is not an antique. sent12: the reboxetine is a kind of a peekaboo. sent13: the alp is either a damages or not a gorgerin or both if it is not an antique. sent14: that the umbel does not homestead mandate but it is a kind of a gorgerin is incorrect. sent15: that the alp is not a kind of a hemagglutination is not right if there exists something such that it is both non-Washingtonian and not non-frivolous. sent16: something is not frivolous. sent17: if something does not damage or it is not a kind of a gorgerin or both it does homestead mandate. sent18: something is not frivolous if the fact that it is not a hemagglutination and it does not homestead mandate is incorrect. sent19: something does homestead mandate if it does not damage. sent20: the fact that if something is not ctenoid and/or it is not a unacceptability then it is albuminuric is true. sent21: the alp does homestead mandate if that it is not a damages is not incorrect. sent22: the reboxetine plucks if something that does homestead mandate is a hemagglutination. sent23: there is something such that it is a hemagglutination. sent24: the alp is a damages and/or is not a gorgerin. sent25: there is something such that it is not a kind of a pluck. sent26: if something is a pluck that it is not a hemagglutination and it does not homestead mandate is not true.
sent6 -> int1: the transudate is not a Washingtonian and is not frivolous.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is both not a Washingtonian and not frivolous.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the alp is a kind of a hemagglutination.; sent17 -> int4: if the alp is either not a damages or not a gorgerin or both then it does homestead mandate.;
the sociobiologist is not frivolous.
sent18 -> int5: if that the sociobiologist is not a hemagglutination and it does not homestead mandate is not true then it is not frivolous.; sent26 -> int6: that the sociobiologist is not a hemagglutination and it does not homestead mandate is incorrect if it is a pluck.;
$hypothesis$ = the reboxetine is a pluck that is a peekaboo. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it homesteads mandate. sent2: the alp completes and it is a kind of a calumet. sent3: the fact that the alp is a hemagglutination if something that is not a kind of a Washingtonian is not frivolous hold. sent4: the mandate is a chaplain and it is argentic. sent5: the transudate is not frivolous. sent6: everything is not a Washingtonian and it is not frivolous. sent7: the alp is a peekaboo if the reboxetine is a gorgerin. sent8: the reboxetine is not a kind of a fortification and is not barographic. sent9: everything is not frivolous. sent10: something is a pluck if it is not a kind of an antique or it is not a hemagglutination or both. sent11: the alp is not an antique. sent12: the reboxetine is a kind of a peekaboo. sent13: the alp is either a damages or not a gorgerin or both if it is not an antique. sent14: that the umbel does not homestead mandate but it is a kind of a gorgerin is incorrect. sent15: that the alp is not a kind of a hemagglutination is not right if there exists something such that it is both non-Washingtonian and not non-frivolous. sent16: something is not frivolous. sent17: if something does not damage or it is not a kind of a gorgerin or both it does homestead mandate. sent18: something is not frivolous if the fact that it is not a hemagglutination and it does not homestead mandate is incorrect. sent19: something does homestead mandate if it does not damage. sent20: the fact that if something is not ctenoid and/or it is not a unacceptability then it is albuminuric is true. sent21: the alp does homestead mandate if that it is not a damages is not incorrect. sent22: the reboxetine plucks if something that does homestead mandate is a hemagglutination. sent23: there is something such that it is a hemagglutination. sent24: the alp is a damages and/or is not a gorgerin. sent25: there is something such that it is not a kind of a pluck. sent26: if something is a pluck that it is not a hemagglutination and it does not homestead mandate is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the transudate is not a Washingtonian and is not frivolous.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is both not a Washingtonian and not frivolous.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the alp is a kind of a hemagglutination.; sent17 -> int4: if the alp is either not a damages or not a gorgerin or both then it does homestead mandate.; __UNKNOWN__