if the fleer is not paroxysmal then the nutriment is not a kind of a Nuytsia but it is a lymphoma.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a hemosiderin and is not a kind of a static is not right then the fleer reinforces fallen. sent2: the fact that the codlins-and-cream is a hemosiderin but it is not a static is false if the nutriment does not quarrel. sent3: if the fleer is paroxysmal the nutriment is not a Nuytsia and is a lymphoma. sent4: something is not a Nuytsia if it is not a revisionist. sent5: if the nutriment is not a quarrel then that that the codlins-and-cream is not a kind of a hemosiderin and it is not a static is not true hold. sent6: if something quarrels then that it is a kind of a lymphoma is correct. sent7: the nutriment is not a kind of a revisionist.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nutriment is not a quarrel.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the codlins-and-cream is both not a hemosiderin and not static is not true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hemosiderin and not static does not hold.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fleer reinforces fallen.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fleer is not paroxysmal is not false.; sent6 -> int4: the nutriment is a lymphoma if it does quarrel.; sent4 -> int5: if the nutriment is not a kind of a revisionist the fact that it is not a Nuytsia is not false.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the nutriment is not a Nuytsia.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fleer is not paroxysmal then the nutriment is not a kind of a Nuytsia but it is a lymphoma. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a hemosiderin and is not a kind of a static is not right then the fleer reinforces fallen. sent2: the fact that the codlins-and-cream is a hemosiderin but it is not a static is false if the nutriment does not quarrel. sent3: if the fleer is paroxysmal the nutriment is not a Nuytsia and is a lymphoma. sent4: something is not a Nuytsia if it is not a revisionist. sent5: if the nutriment is not a quarrel then that that the codlins-and-cream is not a kind of a hemosiderin and it is not a static is not true hold. sent6: if something quarrels then that it is a kind of a lymphoma is correct. sent7: the nutriment is not a kind of a revisionist. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nutriment is not a quarrel.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the codlins-and-cream is both not a hemosiderin and not static is not true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hemosiderin and not static does not hold.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fleer reinforces fallen.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fleer is not paroxysmal is not false.; sent6 -> int4: the nutriment is a lymphoma if it does quarrel.; sent4 -> int5: if the nutriment is not a kind of a revisionist the fact that it is not a Nuytsia is not false.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the nutriment is not a Nuytsia.; __UNKNOWN__