there exists something such that if the fact that it is a brew is true that it is not a kind of a Hoffmann and does not proliferate reeler is false.
sent1: if the rubefacient does brew then it is not a Hoffmann and does not proliferate reeler. sent2: if the rubefacient brews then the fact that that it is not a Hoffmann and proliferates reeler hold is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it brews hold it is not a Hoffmann and it does not proliferate reeler. sent4: that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a brew then that it is a Hoffmann and it does not proliferate reeler is wrong is not wrong. sent5: the fact that something is not oncological and is not a conduit does not hold if it snicks ligne. sent6: if something does brew that it is a Hoffmann and it does not proliferate reeler is not true. sent7: that something is not a Hoffmann but it proliferates reeler is incorrect if it brews. sent8: if something does snick egotist the fact that it does not proliferate doubling and is not a homework is false. sent9: that something is a kind of non-Panamanian thing that is not a Clathrus is wrong if it is isotonic. sent10: if the rubefacient brews then the fact that it is a Hoffmann that does not proliferate reeler is incorrect. sent11: that something is not a Hoffmann and does not proliferate reeler is not correct if it brews. sent12: if something brews then it is not a Hoffmann and does not proliferate reeler. sent13: the fact that something is not a Mergenthaler and it is not a kind of a footcandle is not correct if it is a Rabbi. sent14: there is something such that if it brews then that it is not a Hoffmann and proliferates reeler is incorrect.
sent11 -> int1: if the rubefacient is a brew then the fact that it is not a kind of a Hoffmann and it does not proliferate reeler is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is a brew is true that it is not a kind of a Hoffmann and does not proliferate reeler is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rubefacient does brew then it is not a Hoffmann and does not proliferate reeler. sent2: if the rubefacient brews then the fact that that it is not a Hoffmann and proliferates reeler hold is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it brews hold it is not a Hoffmann and it does not proliferate reeler. sent4: that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a brew then that it is a Hoffmann and it does not proliferate reeler is wrong is not wrong. sent5: the fact that something is not oncological and is not a conduit does not hold if it snicks ligne. sent6: if something does brew that it is a Hoffmann and it does not proliferate reeler is not true. sent7: that something is not a Hoffmann but it proliferates reeler is incorrect if it brews. sent8: if something does snick egotist the fact that it does not proliferate doubling and is not a homework is false. sent9: that something is a kind of non-Panamanian thing that is not a Clathrus is wrong if it is isotonic. sent10: if the rubefacient brews then the fact that it is a Hoffmann that does not proliferate reeler is incorrect. sent11: that something is not a Hoffmann and does not proliferate reeler is not correct if it brews. sent12: if something brews then it is not a Hoffmann and does not proliferate reeler. sent13: the fact that something is not a Mergenthaler and it is not a kind of a footcandle is not correct if it is a Rabbi. sent14: there is something such that if it brews then that it is not a Hoffmann and proliferates reeler is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the rubefacient is a brew then the fact that it is not a kind of a Hoffmann and it does not proliferate reeler is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__