the Bam happens.
sent1: the sally yields that the Bam does not occur. sent2: that the debriefing derailment happens and the Gilbertianness happens does not hold. sent3: that the apophaticness happens and/or the non-bilabialness prevents the non-stimulativeness. sent4: the Bam happens if the Audenesqueness occurs. sent5: the apophaticness does not occur. sent6: if that the apophaticness and/or the non-bilabialness occurs is not right the Audenesqueness occurs. sent7: if the apophaticness happens the stimulativeness happens. sent8: that the investigating proposer happens is not wrong. sent9: that the debriefing derailment does not occur yields that the investigating proposer occurs and the monopsony happens. sent10: if that the debriefing derailment occurs and the Gilbertianness happens is wrong then the debriefing derailment does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apophaticness occurs and/or the bilabialness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the stimulativeness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the stimulativeness happens and/or the sally happens.; sent10 & sent2 -> int3: the debriefing derailment does not occur.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: both the investigating proposer and the monopsony happens.; int4 -> int5: the monopsony happens.;
that the Bam does not occur is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the Bam happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the sally yields that the Bam does not occur. sent2: that the debriefing derailment happens and the Gilbertianness happens does not hold. sent3: that the apophaticness happens and/or the non-bilabialness prevents the non-stimulativeness. sent4: the Bam happens if the Audenesqueness occurs. sent5: the apophaticness does not occur. sent6: if that the apophaticness and/or the non-bilabialness occurs is not right the Audenesqueness occurs. sent7: if the apophaticness happens the stimulativeness happens. sent8: that the investigating proposer happens is not wrong. sent9: that the debriefing derailment does not occur yields that the investigating proposer occurs and the monopsony happens. sent10: if that the debriefing derailment occurs and the Gilbertianness happens is wrong then the debriefing derailment does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apophaticness occurs and/or the bilabialness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the stimulativeness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the stimulativeness happens and/or the sally happens.; sent10 & sent2 -> int3: the debriefing derailment does not occur.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: both the investigating proposer and the monopsony happens.; int4 -> int5: the monopsony happens.; __UNKNOWN__