the petting occurs.
sent1: the drowsing infliction does not occur if the neurosurgery does not occur. sent2: the iliacness does not occur if the detachableness does not occur. sent3: that the animating but not the iliacness happens is not correct. sent4: the spoofing speeder happens if not the drowsing infliction but the seeking happens. sent5: the animating happens if the fact that the dandling skidder happens and the animating does not occur does not hold. sent6: the fact that the reciprocating grain happens hold. sent7: the iliacness happens if the fact that the animating and the non-iliacness occurs is false. sent8: the fact that the expensing but not the animatingness occurs is not correct if the sourness does not occur. sent9: if the detachableness happens the fact that the reciprocating grain does not occur and the nonmetamorphicness does not occur does not hold. sent10: the iliacness occurs and the detachableness occurs if the expense does not occur. sent11: the petting occurs and the expensing occurs if the fact that the nonmetamorphicness does not occur hold. sent12: the amethystineness occurs if that the reciprocating grain does not occur and the nonmetamorphicness does not occur is not correct. sent13: if the estrousness does not occur the drowsing infliction does not occur. sent14: if the spoofing ingot occurs then either the neurosurgery does not occur or the estrousness does not occur or both. sent15: both the spoofing ingot and the apliticness happens. sent16: that the petting but not the sour occurs is wrong if the animatingness occurs. sent17: the fact that both the dandling skidder and the non-animatingness occurs is not true if the spoofing speeder happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonmetamorphicness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: both the reciprocating grain and the nonmetamorphicness happens.; sent7 & sent3 -> int2: the iliacness happens.;
the pet does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the petting occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the drowsing infliction does not occur if the neurosurgery does not occur. sent2: the iliacness does not occur if the detachableness does not occur. sent3: that the animating but not the iliacness happens is not correct. sent4: the spoofing speeder happens if not the drowsing infliction but the seeking happens. sent5: the animating happens if the fact that the dandling skidder happens and the animating does not occur does not hold. sent6: the fact that the reciprocating grain happens hold. sent7: the iliacness happens if the fact that the animating and the non-iliacness occurs is false. sent8: the fact that the expensing but not the animatingness occurs is not correct if the sourness does not occur. sent9: if the detachableness happens the fact that the reciprocating grain does not occur and the nonmetamorphicness does not occur does not hold. sent10: the iliacness occurs and the detachableness occurs if the expense does not occur. sent11: the petting occurs and the expensing occurs if the fact that the nonmetamorphicness does not occur hold. sent12: the amethystineness occurs if that the reciprocating grain does not occur and the nonmetamorphicness does not occur is not correct. sent13: if the estrousness does not occur the drowsing infliction does not occur. sent14: if the spoofing ingot occurs then either the neurosurgery does not occur or the estrousness does not occur or both. sent15: both the spoofing ingot and the apliticness happens. sent16: that the petting but not the sour occurs is wrong if the animatingness occurs. sent17: the fact that both the dandling skidder and the non-animatingness occurs is not true if the spoofing speeder happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonmetamorphicness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: both the reciprocating grain and the nonmetamorphicness happens.; sent7 & sent3 -> int2: the iliacness happens.; __UNKNOWN__