that the Mao is a kind of argentous thing that is not a mandator does not hold.
sent1: something is a sandhi if it is not a triplicity. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a sandhi and it is a acatalectic is not false if it is not a triplicity. sent3: if something is athletic the fact that it is not a kind of a acatalectic and it is fetal is wrong. sent4: there is something such that it does fly. sent5: something is postmenopausal and it is a Centrocercus if it does not subtract billyo. sent6: the fact that the Sotho is not a kind of a triplicity but it is a sandhi is not right if it does not fly. sent7: the fact that something is a Sphyraena that is not acatalectic does not hold if it is not fetal. sent8: if the Sotho is a triplicity but it is not a flies then the Mao does not flies. sent9: if that something is both not a acatalectic and fetal is not right then it is not fetal. sent10: the pardoner is athletic if it is postmenopausal. sent11: the woodworker is not a kind of a Sphyraena if the applewood is not a sandhi and/or it is not a kind of a Sphyraena. sent12: if the pardoner is both a sandhi and not fetal then the applewood is not a sandhi. sent13: if the Sotho is not argentous the fact that the Mao is argentous but it is not a mandator is false. sent14: if something is a kind of a acatalectic and/or is fetal then that it is non-argentous hold. sent15: the pardoner is a sandhi. sent16: that everything does not subtract billyo is correct.
sent2 -> int1: if the Sotho is not a kind of a triplicity it is a sandhi and it is a acatalectic.; sent14 -> int2: if the Sotho is a acatalectic and/or it is fetal it is not argentous.;
the Mao is argentous but it is not a mandator.
sent9 -> int3: if that the pardoner is a kind of non-acatalectic thing that is fetal is wrong then it is not fetal.; sent5 -> int4: if the bordelaise does not subtract billyo then it is postmenopausal thing that is a kind of a Centrocercus.; sent16 -> int5: the fact that the bordelaise does not subtract billyo hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bordelaise is postmenopausal and it is a Centrocercus.; int6 -> int7: everything is postmenopausal and it is a Centrocercus.; int7 -> int8: the pardoner is postmenopausal a Centrocercus.; int8 -> int9: the pardoner is not non-postmenopausal.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the pardoner is athletic.; sent3 -> int11: the fact that the pardoner is both non-acatalectic and not non-fetal does not hold if it is athletic.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the pardoner is non-acatalectic thing that is fetal does not hold.; int3 & int12 -> int13: the pardoner is not fetal.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the pardoner is a sandhi but it is not fetal.; sent12 & int14 -> int15: the applewood is not a sandhi.; int15 -> int16: the applewood is not a sandhi or it is not a kind of a Sphyraena or both.; int16 & sent11 -> int17: the woodworker is not a Sphyraena.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Mao is a kind of argentous thing that is not a mandator does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a sandhi if it is not a triplicity. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a sandhi and it is a acatalectic is not false if it is not a triplicity. sent3: if something is athletic the fact that it is not a kind of a acatalectic and it is fetal is wrong. sent4: there is something such that it does fly. sent5: something is postmenopausal and it is a Centrocercus if it does not subtract billyo. sent6: the fact that the Sotho is not a kind of a triplicity but it is a sandhi is not right if it does not fly. sent7: the fact that something is a Sphyraena that is not acatalectic does not hold if it is not fetal. sent8: if the Sotho is a triplicity but it is not a flies then the Mao does not flies. sent9: if that something is both not a acatalectic and fetal is not right then it is not fetal. sent10: the pardoner is athletic if it is postmenopausal. sent11: the woodworker is not a kind of a Sphyraena if the applewood is not a sandhi and/or it is not a kind of a Sphyraena. sent12: if the pardoner is both a sandhi and not fetal then the applewood is not a sandhi. sent13: if the Sotho is not argentous the fact that the Mao is argentous but it is not a mandator is false. sent14: if something is a kind of a acatalectic and/or is fetal then that it is non-argentous hold. sent15: the pardoner is a sandhi. sent16: that everything does not subtract billyo is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the Sotho is not a kind of a triplicity it is a sandhi and it is a acatalectic.; sent14 -> int2: if the Sotho is a acatalectic and/or it is fetal it is not argentous.; __UNKNOWN__