the camouflage is a monogamy.
sent1: a post-communist thing is not a monogamy. sent2: the fact that the rest is not a Murray and is not Sufi is not true. sent3: the fact that the rest does scald capability and it is a kind of a Murray is false if the resorption is not post-communist. sent4: the resorption is not non-innumerate but post-communist if the rest is not a relict. sent5: that the Karakalpak is not a relict and is Sufi is wrong. sent6: the resorption is not a monogamy. sent7: something is not anthropic if it is a relict. sent8: that the camouflage is not Linnaean and it is not a monogamy is not correct. sent9: the fact that the camouflage is a relict but it is not a Sufi is not true. sent10: if the rest does not scald capability then the Karakalpak is not innumerate. sent11: the Karakalpak is not innumerate if that the rest does scald capability and is a kind of a Murray does not hold. sent12: if the resorption is post-communist the camouflage is post-communist. sent13: if something is not anthropic then it is not Linnaean. sent14: if that the Karakalpak is not a kind of a relict but it is a kind of a Sufi is not right it is a relict. sent15: the fact that the camouflage is not a relict and it is not a kind of a Sufi is false if the Karakalpak is not innumerate. sent16: the rest is non-innumerate if something is a relict. sent17: the resorption is not post-communist. sent18: that the rest is anthropic and it is a Sufi is incorrect if it is not Linnaean.
sent3 & sent17 -> int1: that that the rest does scald capability and it is a Murray is false hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the Karakalpak is not innumerate hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the camouflage is not a relict and it is not a kind of a Sufi does not hold.; sent13 -> int4: if the camouflage is not anthropic then it is not Linnaean.;
that the sporangium is pregnant and a benzyl is not correct.
sent14 & sent5 -> int5: the Karakalpak is a relict.; int5 -> int6: something is a relict.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the rest is not innumerate.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not innumerate.;
$hypothesis$ = the camouflage is a monogamy. ; $context$ = sent1: a post-communist thing is not a monogamy. sent2: the fact that the rest is not a Murray and is not Sufi is not true. sent3: the fact that the rest does scald capability and it is a kind of a Murray is false if the resorption is not post-communist. sent4: the resorption is not non-innumerate but post-communist if the rest is not a relict. sent5: that the Karakalpak is not a relict and is Sufi is wrong. sent6: the resorption is not a monogamy. sent7: something is not anthropic if it is a relict. sent8: that the camouflage is not Linnaean and it is not a monogamy is not correct. sent9: the fact that the camouflage is a relict but it is not a Sufi is not true. sent10: if the rest does not scald capability then the Karakalpak is not innumerate. sent11: the Karakalpak is not innumerate if that the rest does scald capability and is a kind of a Murray does not hold. sent12: if the resorption is post-communist the camouflage is post-communist. sent13: if something is not anthropic then it is not Linnaean. sent14: if that the Karakalpak is not a kind of a relict but it is a kind of a Sufi is not right it is a relict. sent15: the fact that the camouflage is not a relict and it is not a kind of a Sufi is false if the Karakalpak is not innumerate. sent16: the rest is non-innumerate if something is a relict. sent17: the resorption is not post-communist. sent18: that the rest is anthropic and it is a Sufi is incorrect if it is not Linnaean. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent17 -> int1: that that the rest does scald capability and it is a Murray is false hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the Karakalpak is not innumerate hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the camouflage is not a relict and it is not a kind of a Sufi does not hold.; sent13 -> int4: if the camouflage is not anthropic then it is not Linnaean.; __UNKNOWN__