the soundman is not an override but it is retinal.
sent1: the soundman either is plagioclastic or is a lumberman or both. sent2: the soundman does not put orach. sent3: something does not override if the fact that it is a propellant and it puts fibrosity is wrong. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Prociphilus and does laud is not right. sent5: if that the Revere is a lumberman that is a plastic does not hold then the laparoscope is not plagioclastic. sent6: the fact that the soundman is a propellant and puts fibrosity is not true if it is not scapulohumeral. sent7: the fact that something is a lumberman that is a plastic is not right if it is not auricular. sent8: something does not override if it is not a propellant. sent9: the soundman does insinuate if it is plagioclastic. sent10: if something is not a kind of a crypt then it does demonstrate and is auxinic. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not a Prociphilus and does laud is not correct then the mass is a kind of a Prociphilus. sent12: the mass is not a crypt if the fact that the histocompatibility is a crypt and it is plutocratic is not true. sent13: that that the histocompatibility is a crypt and is plutocratic is not right is not wrong. sent14: something is not scapulohumeral if that it puts fibrosity and is an override is false. sent15: if the laparoscope is not a lumberman then the cress is plagioclastic but it is not retinal. sent16: if the cress is scapulohumeral then the fact that the soundman is not an override but retinal is incorrect. sent17: the soundman is an override if the cress is not retinal. sent18: the soundman is not scapulohumeral. sent19: if the soundman is not a kind of a propellant then it is not a kind of an override. sent20: the soundman does insinuate if it is a lumberman. sent21: the chinaberry is a kind of a lumberman. sent22: if the mass is a kind of a Prociphilus that does demonstrate the fact that the Revere is not auricular is right. sent23: something is retinal if it does insinuate.
sent6 & sent18 -> int1: the fact that the soundman is a kind of a propellant that puts fibrosity is not true.; sent3 -> int2: if that the soundman is a kind of a propellant and it puts fibrosity does not hold then it does not override.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the soundman does not override is true.; sent23 -> int4: the soundman is retinal if it insinuates.; sent1 & sent9 & sent20 -> int5: the soundman insinuates.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the soundman is retinal.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the redfish does insinuate.
$hypothesis$ = the soundman is not an override but it is retinal. ; $context$ = sent1: the soundman either is plagioclastic or is a lumberman or both. sent2: the soundman does not put orach. sent3: something does not override if the fact that it is a propellant and it puts fibrosity is wrong. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Prociphilus and does laud is not right. sent5: if that the Revere is a lumberman that is a plastic does not hold then the laparoscope is not plagioclastic. sent6: the fact that the soundman is a propellant and puts fibrosity is not true if it is not scapulohumeral. sent7: the fact that something is a lumberman that is a plastic is not right if it is not auricular. sent8: something does not override if it is not a propellant. sent9: the soundman does insinuate if it is plagioclastic. sent10: if something is not a kind of a crypt then it does demonstrate and is auxinic. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not a Prociphilus and does laud is not correct then the mass is a kind of a Prociphilus. sent12: the mass is not a crypt if the fact that the histocompatibility is a crypt and it is plutocratic is not true. sent13: that that the histocompatibility is a crypt and is plutocratic is not right is not wrong. sent14: something is not scapulohumeral if that it puts fibrosity and is an override is false. sent15: if the laparoscope is not a lumberman then the cress is plagioclastic but it is not retinal. sent16: if the cress is scapulohumeral then the fact that the soundman is not an override but retinal is incorrect. sent17: the soundman is an override if the cress is not retinal. sent18: the soundman is not scapulohumeral. sent19: if the soundman is not a kind of a propellant then it is not a kind of an override. sent20: the soundman does insinuate if it is a lumberman. sent21: the chinaberry is a kind of a lumberman. sent22: if the mass is a kind of a Prociphilus that does demonstrate the fact that the Revere is not auricular is right. sent23: something is retinal if it does insinuate. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent18 -> int1: the fact that the soundman is a kind of a propellant that puts fibrosity is not true.; sent3 -> int2: if that the soundman is a kind of a propellant and it puts fibrosity does not hold then it does not override.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the soundman does not override is true.; sent23 -> int4: the soundman is retinal if it insinuates.; sent1 & sent9 & sent20 -> int5: the soundman insinuates.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the soundman is retinal.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__