there is something such that if it is not a kind of a grounds then it is endodontic and it divests.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not redemptive it rejects and is myeloid. sent2: something does dissemble Korbut and does effect Whitman if it is not a kind of a scud. sent3: there is something such that if it does not ground that it divests is not false. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a grounds it is endodontic. sent5: that if the zodiac is not the scratcher the zodiac does ground and it is cytotoxic is not wrong. sent6: if the zodiac is not endodontic it does dissemble pandiculation and it effects chemical. sent7: the Trappist is endodontic and attentional if it is not macaronic. sent8: if the zodiac is a grounds that it is endodontic thing that divests is right. sent9: there is something such that if it is a Entebbe it does organize Rajidae and it is Bismarckian. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a virginal then it is cytotoxic and it is clamatorial. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is distinguishable hold it is both a popover and Riemannian. sent12: if the zodiac is not a kind of a grounds the fact that it does divest is true. sent13: if the fact that the zodiac is not wingless is true it is a Irelander and it is a kind of a grounds. sent14: the CO does organize phoenicophorium and it is a kind of a Bramante if it does not divest. sent15: the zodiac is endodontic and it does divest if it does not ground.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a kind of a scud then it does dissemble Korbut and effects Whitman.
sent2 -> int1: if the demagnetization is not a scud it does dissemble Korbut and it does effect Whitman.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a grounds then it is endodontic and it divests. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not redemptive it rejects and is myeloid. sent2: something does dissemble Korbut and does effect Whitman if it is not a kind of a scud. sent3: there is something such that if it does not ground that it divests is not false. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a grounds it is endodontic. sent5: that if the zodiac is not the scratcher the zodiac does ground and it is cytotoxic is not wrong. sent6: if the zodiac is not endodontic it does dissemble pandiculation and it effects chemical. sent7: the Trappist is endodontic and attentional if it is not macaronic. sent8: if the zodiac is a grounds that it is endodontic thing that divests is right. sent9: there is something such that if it is a Entebbe it does organize Rajidae and it is Bismarckian. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a virginal then it is cytotoxic and it is clamatorial. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is distinguishable hold it is both a popover and Riemannian. sent12: if the zodiac is not a kind of a grounds the fact that it does divest is true. sent13: if the fact that the zodiac is not wingless is true it is a Irelander and it is a kind of a grounds. sent14: the CO does organize phoenicophorium and it is a kind of a Bramante if it does not divest. sent15: the zodiac is endodontic and it does divest if it does not ground. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__