the fact that the exhibition occurs if the redemptiveness does not occur is not right.
sent1: the fact that the falsehood happens and the hugging conference occurs does not hold. sent2: the deputation occurs if that not the falsehood but the hugging conference happens is false. sent3: that the idiographicness does not occur yields the beggary. sent4: if the deputation occurs the exhibition happens. sent5: that the falsehood does not occur and the hugging conference occurs is false if the reciprocating foil does not occur. sent6: if the falsehood occurs the deputation happens. sent7: if the fact that the telephotography does not occur and the Benineseness happens is not true the snuffling swaggerer occurs. sent8: the macrencephalicness happens. sent9: the reciprocating foil prevents that the redemptiveness does not occur. sent10: if that the reciprocating foil does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the falsehood happens and the hugging conference occurs is not true. sent11: the authorization happens. sent12: the Beninese occurs if the fact that that not the reciprocating separatist but the hugging weald happens hold does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reciprocating foil happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the redemptiveness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the redemptiveness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the reciprocating foil does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the falsehood does not occur and the hugging conference occurs is not right.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the deputation occurs.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: that the exhibition occurs is not false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the exhibition occurs if the redemptiveness does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the falsehood happens and the hugging conference occurs does not hold. sent2: the deputation occurs if that not the falsehood but the hugging conference happens is false. sent3: that the idiographicness does not occur yields the beggary. sent4: if the deputation occurs the exhibition happens. sent5: that the falsehood does not occur and the hugging conference occurs is false if the reciprocating foil does not occur. sent6: if the falsehood occurs the deputation happens. sent7: if the fact that the telephotography does not occur and the Benineseness happens is not true the snuffling swaggerer occurs. sent8: the macrencephalicness happens. sent9: the reciprocating foil prevents that the redemptiveness does not occur. sent10: if that the reciprocating foil does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the falsehood happens and the hugging conference occurs is not true. sent11: the authorization happens. sent12: the Beninese occurs if the fact that that not the reciprocating separatist but the hugging weald happens hold does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reciprocating foil happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the redemptiveness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the redemptiveness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the reciprocating foil does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the falsehood does not occur and the hugging conference occurs is not right.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the deputation occurs.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: that the exhibition occurs is not false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__