the Calymmatobacterium is a Gekkonidae.
sent1: the vizier is efficient. sent2: if the witchgrass is a coinsurance then the Hakham is a collectible. sent3: there is something such that that it is a hypothalamus and it tastes pope is not true. sent4: the vizier is not a inutility if it is not sure. sent5: the Calymmatobacterium is a collectible. sent6: the Calymmatobacterium is a kind of a bridoon. sent7: the witchgrass does not truss witchgrass and does not taste flush. sent8: that the witchgrass is not inefficient if the Hakham is not a coinsurance and not a inutility is not false. sent9: that the vizier is not vitreous hold. sent10: the fact that the chyle is not unappealable but it is a rump is wrong if the Hakham is not quantitative. sent11: if there is something such that it is a zinkenite then the fact that the vizier is sure but it is not a kind of a zinkenite is not true. sent12: that the Hakham is a levitation if the chyle is not quantitative hold. sent13: the witchgrass is not a inutility if it is efficient. sent14: if the Hakham is not sure then the vizier is not sure. sent15: if the Hakham is a collectible then the chyle is not a levitation but it is not non-quantitative. sent16: the Calymmatobacterium is a kind of a Gekkonidae if the witchgrass is efficient. sent17: if the vizier is not a inutility then the Hakham is not a inutility. sent18: the fact that the vizier is a inutility is not true if the fact that it is sure and is not a zinkenite does not hold. sent19: the chyle is not quantitative if there exists something such that it does not taste pope. sent20: if something is a kind of a levitation or is a kind of a collectible or both then the fact that it is not a kind of a coinsurance hold. sent21: the vizier is not a Gekkonidae if something is a zinkenite. sent22: the flush is not efficient. sent23: the chyle is not quantitative if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a hypothalamus and it does taste pope is false. sent24: that there is something such that that it is not a hypothalamus and it does taste pope is wrong hold. sent25: if the fact that the Hakham is a collectible is correct it is not a coinsurance. sent26: the Hakham is not a coinsurance if the vizier is not a coinsurance. sent27: there exists something such that it is not a hypothalamus and tastes pope. sent28: something is not a coinsurance if it is a collectible.
sent24 & sent23 -> int1: that the chyle is not quantitative hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the Hakham is a levitation is true.; int2 -> int3: the Hakham is a kind of a levitation and/or it is a collectible.; sent20 -> int4: if the Hakham is a levitation and/or is a collectible then it is not a kind of a coinsurance.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the Hakham is not a kind of a coinsurance is not false.;
there is something such that the fact that it is not unappealable and it is a rump is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the Calymmatobacterium is a Gekkonidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the vizier is efficient. sent2: if the witchgrass is a coinsurance then the Hakham is a collectible. sent3: there is something such that that it is a hypothalamus and it tastes pope is not true. sent4: the vizier is not a inutility if it is not sure. sent5: the Calymmatobacterium is a collectible. sent6: the Calymmatobacterium is a kind of a bridoon. sent7: the witchgrass does not truss witchgrass and does not taste flush. sent8: that the witchgrass is not inefficient if the Hakham is not a coinsurance and not a inutility is not false. sent9: that the vizier is not vitreous hold. sent10: the fact that the chyle is not unappealable but it is a rump is wrong if the Hakham is not quantitative. sent11: if there is something such that it is a zinkenite then the fact that the vizier is sure but it is not a kind of a zinkenite is not true. sent12: that the Hakham is a levitation if the chyle is not quantitative hold. sent13: the witchgrass is not a inutility if it is efficient. sent14: if the Hakham is not sure then the vizier is not sure. sent15: if the Hakham is a collectible then the chyle is not a levitation but it is not non-quantitative. sent16: the Calymmatobacterium is a kind of a Gekkonidae if the witchgrass is efficient. sent17: if the vizier is not a inutility then the Hakham is not a inutility. sent18: the fact that the vizier is a inutility is not true if the fact that it is sure and is not a zinkenite does not hold. sent19: the chyle is not quantitative if there exists something such that it does not taste pope. sent20: if something is a kind of a levitation or is a kind of a collectible or both then the fact that it is not a kind of a coinsurance hold. sent21: the vizier is not a Gekkonidae if something is a zinkenite. sent22: the flush is not efficient. sent23: the chyle is not quantitative if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a hypothalamus and it does taste pope is false. sent24: that there is something such that that it is not a hypothalamus and it does taste pope is wrong hold. sent25: if the fact that the Hakham is a collectible is correct it is not a coinsurance. sent26: the Hakham is not a coinsurance if the vizier is not a coinsurance. sent27: there exists something such that it is not a hypothalamus and tastes pope. sent28: something is not a coinsurance if it is a collectible. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent23 -> int1: that the chyle is not quantitative hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the Hakham is a levitation is true.; int2 -> int3: the Hakham is a kind of a levitation and/or it is a collectible.; sent20 -> int4: if the Hakham is a levitation and/or is a collectible then it is not a kind of a coinsurance.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the Hakham is not a kind of a coinsurance is not false.; __UNKNOWN__