the swash happens.
sent1: if the laparotomy does not occur that the diagonalizableness does not occur and the conventionalization happens is not true. sent2: the expedient happens if the laparotomy occurs. sent3: the fact that the bargaining Philemon but not the implicationalness happens is wrong. sent4: that the swashing does not occur is caused by that the laparotomy and the non-expedientness occurs. sent5: the swash occurs if the fact that the diagonalizableness does not occur and the conventionalization does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the griping thuggery does not occur and the seaming truculence does not occur is not correct then the paradigmaticness does not occur. sent7: if the conventionalization occurs then the swash happens. sent8: the fact that the fact that the bargaining Philemon does not occur and the implicationalness does not occur does not hold is correct. sent9: the expedientness does not occur if the fact that the bargaining Philemon does not occur and the implicationalness does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the laparotomy and the non-expedientness occurs is caused by the conventionalization. sent11: the twilight occurs if the unthematicness happens. sent12: the fact that the diagonalizableness does not occur and the conventionalization happens is false. sent13: if the bargaining Philemon happens then the fact that the expedientness does not occur is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the laparotomy happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the expedient occurs.; sent9 & sent8 -> int2: the expedientness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the laparotomy does not occur.;
the swash does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the swash happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the laparotomy does not occur that the diagonalizableness does not occur and the conventionalization happens is not true. sent2: the expedient happens if the laparotomy occurs. sent3: the fact that the bargaining Philemon but not the implicationalness happens is wrong. sent4: that the swashing does not occur is caused by that the laparotomy and the non-expedientness occurs. sent5: the swash occurs if the fact that the diagonalizableness does not occur and the conventionalization does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the griping thuggery does not occur and the seaming truculence does not occur is not correct then the paradigmaticness does not occur. sent7: if the conventionalization occurs then the swash happens. sent8: the fact that the fact that the bargaining Philemon does not occur and the implicationalness does not occur does not hold is correct. sent9: the expedientness does not occur if the fact that the bargaining Philemon does not occur and the implicationalness does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the laparotomy and the non-expedientness occurs is caused by the conventionalization. sent11: the twilight occurs if the unthematicness happens. sent12: the fact that the diagonalizableness does not occur and the conventionalization happens is false. sent13: if the bargaining Philemon happens then the fact that the expedientness does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the laparotomy happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the expedient occurs.; sent9 & sent8 -> int2: the expedientness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the laparotomy does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__