the fact that the signorina is not a launch is not incorrect.
sent1: something is porcine if it is a kind of a pellucidness. sent2: there exists something such that it is bronchoscopic. sent3: the fact that something metabolizes kingpin and it is a kind of a gallbladder is not true if it is not a eft. sent4: if a bronchoscopic thing is porcine then the tragedian is a pellucidness. sent5: the kingpin is porcine. sent6: something is a kind of a launch if it is bronchoscopic. sent7: if something is a gallbladder it is basaltic. sent8: the lappet is a kind of a pellucidness. sent9: if the bryophyte is basaltic then the signorina is basaltic. sent10: the signorina is basaltic. sent11: the kingpin is not a pellucidness but it is bronchoscopic if it is not porcine. sent12: that the lappet is a kind of a gallbladder and it launches hold if the fact that the bryophyte does not metabolize kingpin is not incorrect. sent13: the sonar is a pellucidness. sent14: if something is a gallbladder then that it is not apopemptic and/or is basaltic is not wrong. sent15: the bryophyte does not metabolize kingpin. sent16: if the lappet is porcine then the tragedian is porcine. sent17: if the lappet is apopemptic then the bryophyte is basaltic. sent18: the lappet is apopemptic if the tragedian is a pellucidness. sent19: if the kingpin is not a pellucidness but bronchoscopic the fact that the signorina is bronchoscopic is not incorrect. sent20: something is porcine. sent21: if the bryophyte is basaltic then the signorina is basaltic but it is not a launch. sent22: if the lappet is basaltic then it is porcine.
the ragout is a Manzoni and is apopemptic.
sent7 -> int1: if the lappet is a kind of a gallbladder it is basaltic.; sent12 & sent15 -> int2: the lappet is a gallbladder and it is a kind of a launch.; int2 -> int3: the lappet is a gallbladder.; int1 & int3 -> int4: the lappet is basaltic.; sent22 & int4 -> int5: the lappet is porcine.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the tragedian is not non-porcine.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the tragedian is not a pellucidness and/or it is porcine is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the signorina is not a launch is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is porcine if it is a kind of a pellucidness. sent2: there exists something such that it is bronchoscopic. sent3: the fact that something metabolizes kingpin and it is a kind of a gallbladder is not true if it is not a eft. sent4: if a bronchoscopic thing is porcine then the tragedian is a pellucidness. sent5: the kingpin is porcine. sent6: something is a kind of a launch if it is bronchoscopic. sent7: if something is a gallbladder it is basaltic. sent8: the lappet is a kind of a pellucidness. sent9: if the bryophyte is basaltic then the signorina is basaltic. sent10: the signorina is basaltic. sent11: the kingpin is not a pellucidness but it is bronchoscopic if it is not porcine. sent12: that the lappet is a kind of a gallbladder and it launches hold if the fact that the bryophyte does not metabolize kingpin is not incorrect. sent13: the sonar is a pellucidness. sent14: if something is a gallbladder then that it is not apopemptic and/or is basaltic is not wrong. sent15: the bryophyte does not metabolize kingpin. sent16: if the lappet is porcine then the tragedian is porcine. sent17: if the lappet is apopemptic then the bryophyte is basaltic. sent18: the lappet is apopemptic if the tragedian is a pellucidness. sent19: if the kingpin is not a pellucidness but bronchoscopic the fact that the signorina is bronchoscopic is not incorrect. sent20: something is porcine. sent21: if the bryophyte is basaltic then the signorina is basaltic but it is not a launch. sent22: if the lappet is basaltic then it is porcine. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__