there exists something such that if it rids Saroyan then it is not chylific and is an entry.
sent1: the fact that the sneezer does not calcify but it is a kind of a dichromacy is not true if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Mead. sent2: if the sneezer does rid Saroyan the neurotic does not strip alternation but it does rid Buddhist. sent3: the neurotic is not a thermion but it does calcify. sent4: if something is not a kind of an entry and it does not rid Saroyan then that it is not a ogler is not wrong. sent5: that everything is a kind of a Tocharian and is a trekker is right. sent6: everything does calcify. sent7: there exists nothing such that it does unmask and it is not a puncher. sent8: the butt is not a boil and is a dart. sent9: something is not sinistral but it is a velveteen if it does not book rat-a-tat-tat. sent10: something is not chylific if the fact that it is not sinistral and is chylific is not correct. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not chylific then that the sneezer is non-sinistral but not chylific is false. sent12: if that the fact that the sneezer does not calcify and is a dichromacy does not hold is correct it does calcify. sent13: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Mead. sent14: the neurotic is basal and is a expectedness. sent15: that the leucine is not chylific but an entry is not correct if something calcifies. sent16: if the fact that that something does unmask but it is not a puncher is correct is wrong then it does not book rat-a-tat-tat. sent17: the neurotic does not book horsepower. sent18: the fact that the neurotic calcifies is not false. sent19: everything is an entry and it calcifies.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the neurotic does rid Saroyan is true.; sent19 -> int1: that the neurotic is an entry and does calcify is true.; int1 -> int2: the neurotic is an entry.;
the neurotic does not strip alternation and does rid Buddhist.
sent10 -> int3: the sneezer is not chylific if that it is non-sinistral and chylific is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it rids Saroyan then it is not chylific and is an entry. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the sneezer does not calcify but it is a kind of a dichromacy is not true if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Mead. sent2: if the sneezer does rid Saroyan the neurotic does not strip alternation but it does rid Buddhist. sent3: the neurotic is not a thermion but it does calcify. sent4: if something is not a kind of an entry and it does not rid Saroyan then that it is not a ogler is not wrong. sent5: that everything is a kind of a Tocharian and is a trekker is right. sent6: everything does calcify. sent7: there exists nothing such that it does unmask and it is not a puncher. sent8: the butt is not a boil and is a dart. sent9: something is not sinistral but it is a velveteen if it does not book rat-a-tat-tat. sent10: something is not chylific if the fact that it is not sinistral and is chylific is not correct. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not chylific then that the sneezer is non-sinistral but not chylific is false. sent12: if that the fact that the sneezer does not calcify and is a dichromacy does not hold is correct it does calcify. sent13: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Mead. sent14: the neurotic is basal and is a expectedness. sent15: that the leucine is not chylific but an entry is not correct if something calcifies. sent16: if the fact that that something does unmask but it is not a puncher is correct is wrong then it does not book rat-a-tat-tat. sent17: the neurotic does not book horsepower. sent18: the fact that the neurotic calcifies is not false. sent19: everything is an entry and it calcifies. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the neurotic does rid Saroyan is true.; sent19 -> int1: that the neurotic is an entry and does calcify is true.; int1 -> int2: the neurotic is an entry.; __UNKNOWN__