that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a vanguard and is unprophetic it does not resent dronabinol is false.
sent1: if something that does not resent dronabinol is a dairymaid it is not a shrike. sent2: something that does not parallel doily and is assertive does not overbear plowshare. sent3: if the fact that the fetoscope is not unprophetic but it glorifies hold it is not drinkable. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not overbear Chamaemelum and it is a redshift then that it is not a kind of a officialese hold. sent5: if the playmaker is not a vanguard and is unprophetic it does not resent dronabinol. sent6: the playmaker does not parallel thulium if it is a kind of non-agrobiologic thing that is drinkable. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a vanguard and it is unprophetic then it does not resent dronabinol. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not resent manifest and it is an egomaniac it is not a Porte. sent9: the playmaker does resent dronabinol if it is both not a vanguard and unprophetic. sent10: the playmaker does not resent dronabinol if it is not a kind of an egomaniac and parallels concomitance. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a vanguard and is unprophetic it does resent dronabinol. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a blues and resents impromptu it does not parallel leprechaun. sent13: the playmaker does not resent impromptu if it is not a kind of a rheostat and it is unprophetic. sent14: if the playmaker is not cyclopean but it is a masse it is not a kind of a remove. sent15: if the mist is not a climb but spineless it is not a vanguard. sent16: the playmaker does not parallel doily if it is both not a vanguard and fallible. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not cinerary and it is a kind of a Attic then it is not verbal. sent18: if that something is not a bornite but it is cinerary is not incorrect it is not a wholeheartedness. sent19: the playmaker does not resent dronabinol if that it is a vanguard and it is unprophetic is correct.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the lazuli does not resent dronabinol but it is a dairymaid then it is not a shrike.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a vanguard and is unprophetic it does not resent dronabinol is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does not resent dronabinol is a dairymaid it is not a shrike. sent2: something that does not parallel doily and is assertive does not overbear plowshare. sent3: if the fact that the fetoscope is not unprophetic but it glorifies hold it is not drinkable. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not overbear Chamaemelum and it is a redshift then that it is not a kind of a officialese hold. sent5: if the playmaker is not a vanguard and is unprophetic it does not resent dronabinol. sent6: the playmaker does not parallel thulium if it is a kind of non-agrobiologic thing that is drinkable. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a vanguard and it is unprophetic then it does not resent dronabinol. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not resent manifest and it is an egomaniac it is not a Porte. sent9: the playmaker does resent dronabinol if it is both not a vanguard and unprophetic. sent10: the playmaker does not resent dronabinol if it is not a kind of an egomaniac and parallels concomitance. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a vanguard and is unprophetic it does resent dronabinol. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a blues and resents impromptu it does not parallel leprechaun. sent13: the playmaker does not resent impromptu if it is not a kind of a rheostat and it is unprophetic. sent14: if the playmaker is not cyclopean but it is a masse it is not a kind of a remove. sent15: if the mist is not a climb but spineless it is not a vanguard. sent16: the playmaker does not parallel doily if it is both not a vanguard and fallible. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not cinerary and it is a kind of a Attic then it is not verbal. sent18: if that something is not a bornite but it is cinerary is not incorrect it is not a wholeheartedness. sent19: the playmaker does not resent dronabinol if that it is a vanguard and it is unprophetic is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__