that the monopsony is caused by the facilitating none is not true.
sent1: if the counterblow happens not the bypassing cakewalk but the catechismalness happens. sent2: the anisogameticness happens if the ferment happens. sent3: the genocide happens if the bypassing cakewalk occurs. sent4: the depiction does not occur. sent5: that both the refund and the counterblow happens is brought about by that the twining truancy does not occur. sent6: if the consultancy does not occur the debuting but not the twining truancy happens. sent7: both the depiction and the brisantness happens if the facilitating none does not occur. sent8: the fact that the expressing happens hold. sent9: the debut happens. sent10: the facilitating none does not occur if the fact that the twining Kline does not occur and the facilitating none happens is not right. sent11: the monopsony does not occur if the bypassing cakewalk does not occur and the catechismalness occurs. sent12: the twining Oklahoman happens and the consultancy does not occur if the unrespectableness does not occur. sent13: not the barking sisterhood but the fender-bender occurs. sent14: the twining Ayurveda is triggered by that not the driving but the hypothermicness happens. sent15: the bypassing cakewalk does not occur. sent16: the ticking occurs. sent17: the demurrage occurs. sent18: the monopsony is brought about by that not the depiction but the facilitating none occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the facilitating none happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the depiction does not occur but the facilitating none happens.; sent18 & int1 -> int2: the monopsony happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the brisantness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the monopsony is caused by the facilitating none is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the counterblow happens not the bypassing cakewalk but the catechismalness happens. sent2: the anisogameticness happens if the ferment happens. sent3: the genocide happens if the bypassing cakewalk occurs. sent4: the depiction does not occur. sent5: that both the refund and the counterblow happens is brought about by that the twining truancy does not occur. sent6: if the consultancy does not occur the debuting but not the twining truancy happens. sent7: both the depiction and the brisantness happens if the facilitating none does not occur. sent8: the fact that the expressing happens hold. sent9: the debut happens. sent10: the facilitating none does not occur if the fact that the twining Kline does not occur and the facilitating none happens is not right. sent11: the monopsony does not occur if the bypassing cakewalk does not occur and the catechismalness occurs. sent12: the twining Oklahoman happens and the consultancy does not occur if the unrespectableness does not occur. sent13: not the barking sisterhood but the fender-bender occurs. sent14: the twining Ayurveda is triggered by that not the driving but the hypothermicness happens. sent15: the bypassing cakewalk does not occur. sent16: the ticking occurs. sent17: the demurrage occurs. sent18: the monopsony is brought about by that not the depiction but the facilitating none occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the facilitating none happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the depiction does not occur but the facilitating none happens.; sent18 & int1 -> int2: the monopsony happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__