the insecureness does not occur.
sent1: that the hecatomb happens is triggered by the lovableness. sent2: the pressorness happens. sent3: the dinging plunger happens or the lovableness occurs or both. sent4: the aldermanicness does not occur if the hecatomb happens. sent5: the backgammon occurs and the ageism does not occur. sent6: the Roman but not the let occurs. sent7: if that the categorialness and the non-insecureness happens does not hold then the snub happens. sent8: the fact that both the categorialness and the insecureness occurs is not right. sent9: the intelligibleness does not occur. sent10: that the Roman does not occur leads to the non-neurasthenicness. sent11: if the Roman and the let happens the snub does not occur. sent12: the theoreticalness happens. sent13: the imparting finance happens if the fact that the switcheroo does not occur hold. sent14: if the sleeping herder does not occur then the sleeping Shrovetide occurs. sent15: the recombination occurs but the light-dutiness does not occur. sent16: if the aldermanicness does not occur that both the let and the snub happens is not correct. sent17: the recombination but not the eviction happens. sent18: the Huxleyanness happens. sent19: the dinging broad-mindedness does not occur. sent20: that the letting does not occur is brought about by that the aldermanicness does not occur and the hecatomb does not occur. sent21: that the mock happens and the twins does not occur is not incorrect. sent22: the flexing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the categorialness happens but the insecureness does not occur does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the snub happens.;
the insecureness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the insecureness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the hecatomb happens is triggered by the lovableness. sent2: the pressorness happens. sent3: the dinging plunger happens or the lovableness occurs or both. sent4: the aldermanicness does not occur if the hecatomb happens. sent5: the backgammon occurs and the ageism does not occur. sent6: the Roman but not the let occurs. sent7: if that the categorialness and the non-insecureness happens does not hold then the snub happens. sent8: the fact that both the categorialness and the insecureness occurs is not right. sent9: the intelligibleness does not occur. sent10: that the Roman does not occur leads to the non-neurasthenicness. sent11: if the Roman and the let happens the snub does not occur. sent12: the theoreticalness happens. sent13: the imparting finance happens if the fact that the switcheroo does not occur hold. sent14: if the sleeping herder does not occur then the sleeping Shrovetide occurs. sent15: the recombination occurs but the light-dutiness does not occur. sent16: if the aldermanicness does not occur that both the let and the snub happens is not correct. sent17: the recombination but not the eviction happens. sent18: the Huxleyanness happens. sent19: the dinging broad-mindedness does not occur. sent20: that the letting does not occur is brought about by that the aldermanicness does not occur and the hecatomb does not occur. sent21: that the mock happens and the twins does not occur is not incorrect. sent22: the flexing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the categorialness happens but the insecureness does not occur does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the snub happens.; __UNKNOWN__