that that there exists something such that if it is nonassociative and it is not a defendant then it is not a hauberk is not incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is nonassociative and is a defendant it is not a kind of a hauberk. sent2: the scaler is a kind of a deep if it is not non-embolic and not a defendant. sent3: there is something such that if it decamps and is not a caduceus then it is not a cachou. sent4: the oarfish is a kind of a crud if it is a hauberk and it does not spirit. sent5: there exists something such that if it is polite and it is not multiform then it is not stingy. sent6: the scaler is a hauberk if it is nonassociative and it is not a defendant. sent7: the fact that if something that is a kind of a defendant is not an amphibole then it is not saxicolous is not false. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is both papal and not Solomonic is true then it is not a hail. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a microcircuit and it is a deep it does not anneal. sent10: there is something such that if it is not non-light but boskopoid then it does not disown incompetent. sent11: there is something such that if it is a consignee and not a state it is papal. sent12: the scaler is not a kind of a hauberk if it is not associative and it is not a defendant. sent13: there exists something such that if it is Nicaean and not favorable it is not a KGB. sent14: if the paperknife is a kind of a hauberk but it does not jolt it is not a kind of a photosphere. sent15: the scaler is not a hauberk if it is nonassociative and it is a defendant. sent16: the fact that the scaler is a dimple is true if it gins Gadidae and is not a kind of a first-rater. sent17: there exists something such that if it is excretory and it is not a kind of a lisp it is not non-pyretic. sent18: if something is both a KGB and not a spinnaker then it is not a defendant. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of mindful thing that does not gin dash then it does not reprise quadrupling. sent20: there is something such that if it is a kind of nonassociative thing that is not a kind of a defendant it is a hauberk. sent21: there is something such that if that it reprises Myriophyllum and is not acinar is correct it does gin electrocautery.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
the quadrupling is not saxicolous if it is a kind of a defendant and it is not a kind of an amphibole.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that there exists something such that if it is nonassociative and it is not a defendant then it is not a hauberk is not incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is nonassociative and is a defendant it is not a kind of a hauberk. sent2: the scaler is a kind of a deep if it is not non-embolic and not a defendant. sent3: there is something such that if it decamps and is not a caduceus then it is not a cachou. sent4: the oarfish is a kind of a crud if it is a hauberk and it does not spirit. sent5: there exists something such that if it is polite and it is not multiform then it is not stingy. sent6: the scaler is a hauberk if it is nonassociative and it is not a defendant. sent7: the fact that if something that is a kind of a defendant is not an amphibole then it is not saxicolous is not false. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is both papal and not Solomonic is true then it is not a hail. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a microcircuit and it is a deep it does not anneal. sent10: there is something such that if it is not non-light but boskopoid then it does not disown incompetent. sent11: there is something such that if it is a consignee and not a state it is papal. sent12: the scaler is not a kind of a hauberk if it is not associative and it is not a defendant. sent13: there exists something such that if it is Nicaean and not favorable it is not a KGB. sent14: if the paperknife is a kind of a hauberk but it does not jolt it is not a kind of a photosphere. sent15: the scaler is not a hauberk if it is nonassociative and it is a defendant. sent16: the fact that the scaler is a dimple is true if it gins Gadidae and is not a kind of a first-rater. sent17: there exists something such that if it is excretory and it is not a kind of a lisp it is not non-pyretic. sent18: if something is both a KGB and not a spinnaker then it is not a defendant. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of mindful thing that does not gin dash then it does not reprise quadrupling. sent20: there is something such that if it is a kind of nonassociative thing that is not a kind of a defendant it is a hauberk. sent21: there is something such that if that it reprises Myriophyllum and is not acinar is correct it does gin electrocautery. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__