that the stationery is cranial and it is a kind of a literate is incorrect.
sent1: the stationery is both cranial and literate if that the polymath is not a literate is not false. sent2: if the stationery is illiterate the polymath is cranial thing that is a kind of an illiterate. sent3: the swamp is a gastroenterostomy. sent4: the polymath is not a kind of a literate if a specialist is a gastroenterostomy. sent5: the swamp is a literate if the polymath is not a specialist. sent6: the swamp is a specialist if it guards jammed. sent7: if the swamp is a pedal then it is a playpen. sent8: there is something such that it either does not idealize rocketry or is not a tonic or both. sent9: if there is something such that either it is not a gastroenterostomy or it is not a kind of a specialist or both then the swamp is a literate. sent10: that the wastage is not a gastroenterostomy is correct. sent11: the fact that the swamp idealizes rocketry hold. sent12: that the swamp guards jammed hold if either something does not idealize rocketry or it is not a tonic or both.
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: the swamp guards jammed.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the swamp is a specialist.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the swamp is both a specialist and a gastroenterostomy.; int3 -> int4: something is a specialist and is a gastroenterostomy.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the polymath is not a literate.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the stationery is cranial and it is a kind of a literate is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the stationery is both cranial and literate if that the polymath is not a literate is not false. sent2: if the stationery is illiterate the polymath is cranial thing that is a kind of an illiterate. sent3: the swamp is a gastroenterostomy. sent4: the polymath is not a kind of a literate if a specialist is a gastroenterostomy. sent5: the swamp is a literate if the polymath is not a specialist. sent6: the swamp is a specialist if it guards jammed. sent7: if the swamp is a pedal then it is a playpen. sent8: there is something such that it either does not idealize rocketry or is not a tonic or both. sent9: if there is something such that either it is not a gastroenterostomy or it is not a kind of a specialist or both then the swamp is a literate. sent10: that the wastage is not a gastroenterostomy is correct. sent11: the fact that the swamp idealizes rocketry hold. sent12: that the swamp guards jammed hold if either something does not idealize rocketry or it is not a tonic or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: the swamp guards jammed.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the swamp is a specialist.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the swamp is both a specialist and a gastroenterostomy.; int3 -> int4: something is a specialist and is a gastroenterostomy.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the polymath is not a literate.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__