that that the muffing weasel does not occur and the oropharyngealness does not occur is caused by the pacing is not true.
sent1: the unadaptableness does not occur. sent2: the promoting does not occur. sent3: that both the non-unadaptableness and the oropharyngealness occurs prevents that the pacing occurs. sent4: the insectanness happens. sent5: if the trophicness does not occur the manacling does not occur or the sounding absolver does not occur or both. sent6: the upstage does not occur and the soteriologicalness does not occur. sent7: the trophicness does not occur. sent8: if the sounding absolver does not occur the muffing weasel does not occur. sent9: that the protectorship does not occur and the arachnoid does not occur is caused by the solution. sent10: that the manacling does not occur leads to that the muffing weasel does not occur. sent11: if both the non-arachnoidness and the gravitationalness occurs the walkout does not occur. sent12: that the explosive does not occur is caused by the non-jihadiness. sent13: that the barring does not occur is brought about by that the cheapness does not occur but the step occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oropharyngealness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the non-unadaptableness and the oropharyngealness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the pacing does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pacing happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the oropharyngealness does not occur.; sent5 & sent7 -> int5: either the manacling does not occur or the sounding absolver does not occur or both.; int5 & sent10 & sent8 -> int6: the muffing weasel does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the muffing weasel does not occur and the oropharyngealness does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the muffing weasel does not occur and the oropharyngealness does not occur is caused by the pacing is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the unadaptableness does not occur. sent2: the promoting does not occur. sent3: that both the non-unadaptableness and the oropharyngealness occurs prevents that the pacing occurs. sent4: the insectanness happens. sent5: if the trophicness does not occur the manacling does not occur or the sounding absolver does not occur or both. sent6: the upstage does not occur and the soteriologicalness does not occur. sent7: the trophicness does not occur. sent8: if the sounding absolver does not occur the muffing weasel does not occur. sent9: that the protectorship does not occur and the arachnoid does not occur is caused by the solution. sent10: that the manacling does not occur leads to that the muffing weasel does not occur. sent11: if both the non-arachnoidness and the gravitationalness occurs the walkout does not occur. sent12: that the explosive does not occur is caused by the non-jihadiness. sent13: that the barring does not occur is brought about by that the cheapness does not occur but the step occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oropharyngealness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the non-unadaptableness and the oropharyngealness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the pacing does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pacing happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the oropharyngealness does not occur.; sent5 & sent7 -> int5: either the manacling does not occur or the sounding absolver does not occur or both.; int5 & sent10 & sent8 -> int6: the muffing weasel does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the muffing weasel does not occur and the oropharyngealness does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__