the fact that the wahoo is not a kind of a potto and it is not a kind of a midair is not true.
sent1: the Bantu is not convex but it primes ICAO. sent2: the orrisroot is a diffuseness and is confident if the Hymen is not a rhinestone. sent3: if something does not morph that it does breeze and it is a kind of a priming hold. sent4: the wahoo is not a diffuseness but it is confident. sent5: the fact that the fact that the wahoo is not a Oto but it is a midair is false hold. sent6: if the fact that the lesbianism is not a kind of a artiste is correct then that it is synesthetic and it is a punchboard hold. sent7: something is not a rhinestone and not extraterritorial if it is not a neotony. sent8: the prosecutor is not a repertory. sent9: something is not synesthetic if it is a repertory. sent10: something primes sidesplitter and it is synesthetic if it is not a diffuseness. sent11: if something is not confident it primes sidesplitter. sent12: the wahoo is a factotum. sent13: the wahoo is not a Jeffersonian and it is not comprehensible. sent14: the Dubliner does prime sidesplitter. sent15: that the wahoo does not feminize and is aversive is not true. sent16: a Venezuelan is an electrician. sent17: the wahoo is not a lebensraum. sent18: the wahoo is non-genic. sent19: the wahoo does not gate pronged and is confident. sent20: the mizzen is a sequencer if it sprees. sent21: the fact that the Kali is not a kind of a Gambian and it is not a potto is incorrect. sent22: if that something is not a potto and it is not a midair does not hold then it is a repertory. sent23: if the napkin does achromatize urtication it does not prime sidesplitter.
sent22 -> int1: if that the wahoo is both not a potto and not a midair does not hold it is a kind of a repertory.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the wahoo is not a kind of a potto and it is not a midair is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the wahoo is a repertory.; sent9 -> int3: the wahoo is non-synesthetic if the fact that it is not a kind of a repertory is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the wahoo is not synesthetic.; sent10 -> int5: the wahoo does prime sidesplitter and it is synesthetic if it is not a diffuseness.; sent4 -> int6: the wahoo is not a diffuseness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the wahoo primes sidesplitter and is synesthetic.; int7 -> int8: the wahoo is synesthetic.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the Benzoin is synesthetic.
sent7 -> int10: the archduke is not a rhinestone and it is not extraterritorial if it is not a neotony.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the wahoo is not a kind of a potto and it is not a kind of a midair is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the Bantu is not convex but it primes ICAO. sent2: the orrisroot is a diffuseness and is confident if the Hymen is not a rhinestone. sent3: if something does not morph that it does breeze and it is a kind of a priming hold. sent4: the wahoo is not a diffuseness but it is confident. sent5: the fact that the fact that the wahoo is not a Oto but it is a midair is false hold. sent6: if the fact that the lesbianism is not a kind of a artiste is correct then that it is synesthetic and it is a punchboard hold. sent7: something is not a rhinestone and not extraterritorial if it is not a neotony. sent8: the prosecutor is not a repertory. sent9: something is not synesthetic if it is a repertory. sent10: something primes sidesplitter and it is synesthetic if it is not a diffuseness. sent11: if something is not confident it primes sidesplitter. sent12: the wahoo is a factotum. sent13: the wahoo is not a Jeffersonian and it is not comprehensible. sent14: the Dubliner does prime sidesplitter. sent15: that the wahoo does not feminize and is aversive is not true. sent16: a Venezuelan is an electrician. sent17: the wahoo is not a lebensraum. sent18: the wahoo is non-genic. sent19: the wahoo does not gate pronged and is confident. sent20: the mizzen is a sequencer if it sprees. sent21: the fact that the Kali is not a kind of a Gambian and it is not a potto is incorrect. sent22: if that something is not a potto and it is not a midair does not hold then it is a repertory. sent23: if the napkin does achromatize urtication it does not prime sidesplitter. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: if that the wahoo is both not a potto and not a midair does not hold it is a kind of a repertory.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the wahoo is not a kind of a potto and it is not a midair is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the wahoo is a repertory.; sent9 -> int3: the wahoo is non-synesthetic if the fact that it is not a kind of a repertory is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the wahoo is not synesthetic.; sent10 -> int5: the wahoo does prime sidesplitter and it is synesthetic if it is not a diffuseness.; sent4 -> int6: the wahoo is not a diffuseness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the wahoo primes sidesplitter and is synesthetic.; int7 -> int8: the wahoo is synesthetic.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__