the Capricorn is not a pinesap and does indemnify.
sent1: if that the Capricorn does clothe and is not a Sturnella does not hold the viverrine does not indemnify. sent2: everything amplifies statics. sent3: everything does clothe and it is a kind of a Sturnella. sent4: that the Capricorn is mature hold. sent5: the fact that the etiologist is a mouthpart and does not amplify euro does not hold if the Capricorn is a mouthpart. sent6: that the viverrine is both a mouthpart and a Sturnella is incorrect. sent7: if that that the Capricorn is not a pinesap but it indemnifies is incorrect is not incorrect it is a kind of a mouthpart. sent8: the fact that the etiologist is a kind of a Sturnella but it does not clothe is not true if the viverrine is a Sturnella. sent9: the fact that the etiologist is a pinesap and it is a mouthpart does not hold. sent10: if the etiologist does amplify euro then that the Capricorn is not a pinesap but it does indemnify is false. sent11: if something does not clothe then it amplifies euro and is a mouthpart. sent12: the etiologist does amplify euro if it is not a Sturnella.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Capricorn is not a pinesap but it indemnifies is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Capricorn is a mouthpart.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the etiologist is a kind of a mouthpart that does not amplify euro is not correct.; sent3 -> int3: the viverrine clothes and it is a Sturnella.; int3 -> int4: that the viverrine clothes is correct.;
the fact that the Capricorn is not a kind of a pinesap and indemnifies is not correct.
sent11 -> int5: if the fact that the etiologist does not clothe hold it amplifies euro and is a kind of a mouthpart.;
$hypothesis$ = the Capricorn is not a pinesap and does indemnify. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Capricorn does clothe and is not a Sturnella does not hold the viverrine does not indemnify. sent2: everything amplifies statics. sent3: everything does clothe and it is a kind of a Sturnella. sent4: that the Capricorn is mature hold. sent5: the fact that the etiologist is a mouthpart and does not amplify euro does not hold if the Capricorn is a mouthpart. sent6: that the viverrine is both a mouthpart and a Sturnella is incorrect. sent7: if that that the Capricorn is not a pinesap but it indemnifies is incorrect is not incorrect it is a kind of a mouthpart. sent8: the fact that the etiologist is a kind of a Sturnella but it does not clothe is not true if the viverrine is a Sturnella. sent9: the fact that the etiologist is a pinesap and it is a mouthpart does not hold. sent10: if the etiologist does amplify euro then that the Capricorn is not a pinesap but it does indemnify is false. sent11: if something does not clothe then it amplifies euro and is a mouthpart. sent12: the etiologist does amplify euro if it is not a Sturnella. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Capricorn is not a pinesap but it indemnifies is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Capricorn is a mouthpart.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the etiologist is a kind of a mouthpart that does not amplify euro is not correct.; sent3 -> int3: the viverrine clothes and it is a Sturnella.; int3 -> int4: that the viverrine clothes is correct.; __UNKNOWN__