the linen is not ovoviviparous.
sent1: the explorer does not outsell seclusion and it is not a kind of a chyme. sent2: if something does not outsell seclusion and/or it does mold Pandanaceae then the fettuccine does mold Pandanaceae. sent3: something is ovoviviparous thing that is fermentable if it is not a loasa. sent4: the merchant is a turned and a salve if that something does mold Pandanaceae is not wrong. sent5: if the mascarpone turns and does not salve then it is a loasa. sent6: either the Farmer does not outsell seclusion or it does mold Pandanaceae or both. sent7: if the fact that something is a Ornithorhynchus but it does not fear is not true it is not a loasa. sent8: the varnisher is both a loasa and a shamefulness. sent9: the mascarpone is not barytic. sent10: that the linen is a Ornithorhynchus and not a fear is not correct if the mascarpone is non-Manchurian. sent11: something that is not a Ornithorhynchus is not a kind of a fear. sent12: there is something such that that it either is barytic or is a shamefulness or both does not hold. sent13: the fact that if something is not a Ornithorhynchus then it bifurcates and is fermentable is not wrong. sent14: the mascarpone is fermentable if there is something such that that it is barytic or a shamefulness or both is not true. sent15: the fettuccine is not Manchurian and it is not a fear if the merchant is not a kind of a fear. sent16: if the fettuccine is not Manchurian and is not a fear then the linen is not ovoviviparous. sent17: the mascarpone is a turned and not a salve.
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the mascarpone is not non-fermentable.; sent5 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the mascarpone is a kind of a loasa is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mascarpone is fermentable thing that is a kind of a loasa.; sent11 -> int4: if the merchant is not a Ornithorhynchus then it does not fear.;
the varnisher is a shamefulness and bifurcates.
sent8 -> int5: the varnisher is a shamefulness.; sent13 -> int6: the mascarpone bifurcates and is fermentable if it is not a Ornithorhynchus.;
$hypothesis$ = the linen is not ovoviviparous. ; $context$ = sent1: the explorer does not outsell seclusion and it is not a kind of a chyme. sent2: if something does not outsell seclusion and/or it does mold Pandanaceae then the fettuccine does mold Pandanaceae. sent3: something is ovoviviparous thing that is fermentable if it is not a loasa. sent4: the merchant is a turned and a salve if that something does mold Pandanaceae is not wrong. sent5: if the mascarpone turns and does not salve then it is a loasa. sent6: either the Farmer does not outsell seclusion or it does mold Pandanaceae or both. sent7: if the fact that something is a Ornithorhynchus but it does not fear is not true it is not a loasa. sent8: the varnisher is both a loasa and a shamefulness. sent9: the mascarpone is not barytic. sent10: that the linen is a Ornithorhynchus and not a fear is not correct if the mascarpone is non-Manchurian. sent11: something that is not a Ornithorhynchus is not a kind of a fear. sent12: there is something such that that it either is barytic or is a shamefulness or both does not hold. sent13: the fact that if something is not a Ornithorhynchus then it bifurcates and is fermentable is not wrong. sent14: the mascarpone is fermentable if there is something such that that it is barytic or a shamefulness or both is not true. sent15: the fettuccine is not Manchurian and it is not a fear if the merchant is not a kind of a fear. sent16: if the fettuccine is not Manchurian and is not a fear then the linen is not ovoviviparous. sent17: the mascarpone is a turned and not a salve. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the mascarpone is not non-fermentable.; sent5 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the mascarpone is a kind of a loasa is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mascarpone is fermentable thing that is a kind of a loasa.; sent11 -> int4: if the merchant is not a Ornithorhynchus then it does not fear.; __UNKNOWN__