that the Miro is not a homosexual and is not a kind of a misappropriation is incorrect.
sent1: if the silver is passionless then it rages unseemliness. sent2: if something does not hunger Miro that it is both non-homosexual and not a misappropriation is wrong. sent3: there is something such that it is a basinet and it is non-artful. sent4: there is something such that it is a tufa. sent5: the avadavat does rage unseemliness if there is something such that it is a kind of a gauntlet and it is likely. sent6: the avadavat is passionless. sent7: if there is something such that it is a basinet and it is not artful the Miro is a kind of a Grenadian. sent8: the avadavat is angiomatous. sent9: if the silver totals and it does rage unseemliness the avadavat is not angiomatous. sent10: the silver is passionless and constructs plum.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the Miro is a Grenadian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Miro does hunger Miro.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Miro is a kind of a Grenadian that does hunger Miro.; int2 -> int3: something is Grenadian thing that hungers Miro.; sent10 -> int4: the silver is passionless.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the silver rages unseemliness.; sent2 -> int6: the fact that the Miro is not a homosexual and it is not a misappropriation is not right if it does not hunger Miro.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Miro is not a homosexual and is not a kind of a misappropriation is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the silver is passionless then it rages unseemliness. sent2: if something does not hunger Miro that it is both non-homosexual and not a misappropriation is wrong. sent3: there is something such that it is a basinet and it is non-artful. sent4: there is something such that it is a tufa. sent5: the avadavat does rage unseemliness if there is something such that it is a kind of a gauntlet and it is likely. sent6: the avadavat is passionless. sent7: if there is something such that it is a basinet and it is not artful the Miro is a kind of a Grenadian. sent8: the avadavat is angiomatous. sent9: if the silver totals and it does rage unseemliness the avadavat is not angiomatous. sent10: the silver is passionless and constructs plum. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the Miro is a Grenadian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Miro does hunger Miro.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Miro is a kind of a Grenadian that does hunger Miro.; int2 -> int3: something is Grenadian thing that hungers Miro.; sent10 -> int4: the silver is passionless.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the silver rages unseemliness.; sent2 -> int6: the fact that the Miro is not a homosexual and it is not a misappropriation is not right if it does not hunger Miro.; __UNKNOWN__