the fact that that there exists something such that if that it is not a Taricha and it is not avionics is wrong it is a kind of a hoe is not incorrect is false.
sent1: if that something is not a nearness and not a boast is wrong it is a Lydian. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is both not a Taricha and avionics is not correct then it hoes. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a Taricha and not avionics it is a hoe. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a Taricha and it is not avionics is false then it is a hoe. sent5: the hindrance is a kind of a Cabell if that it is not a putoff and it is not a hoe is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that if that it is not a disquisition and it does not lather stub does not hold it denaturalizes bimillennium. sent7: the fishery is avionics if the fact that it is not a kind of a remit and it does not condition is not right. sent8: there exists something such that if that it does not mist and it is not a rhinoplasty is not true then it is hydrostatics. sent9: there exists something such that if it is avionics then it is a hoe. sent10: if the fact that the hindrance is not a Taricha and is not avionics is wrong then it is a kind of a hoe. sent11: the hindrance is a hoe if that it is a kind of a Taricha and it is not avionics does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a Lotus and it is not enthusiastic does not hold then it is diagonalizable. sent13: if the fact that something does not denaturalize saltine and is not a fundamentalist does not hold it hoes. sent14: the fact that if the hindrance is avionics the hindrance is a kind of a hoe is true. sent15: if the hindrance is not a Taricha and it is not avionics then it is a hoe. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a Taricha it is a hoe.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is not a nearness and does not boast does not hold then it is a Lydian.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the saltine is not a Lydian is not correct if that it is not a nearness and not a boast is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that there exists something such that if that it is not a Taricha and it is not avionics is wrong it is a kind of a hoe is not incorrect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a nearness and not a boast is wrong it is a Lydian. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is both not a Taricha and avionics is not correct then it hoes. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a Taricha and not avionics it is a hoe. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a Taricha and it is not avionics is false then it is a hoe. sent5: the hindrance is a kind of a Cabell if that it is not a putoff and it is not a hoe is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that if that it is not a disquisition and it does not lather stub does not hold it denaturalizes bimillennium. sent7: the fishery is avionics if the fact that it is not a kind of a remit and it does not condition is not right. sent8: there exists something such that if that it does not mist and it is not a rhinoplasty is not true then it is hydrostatics. sent9: there exists something such that if it is avionics then it is a hoe. sent10: if the fact that the hindrance is not a Taricha and is not avionics is wrong then it is a kind of a hoe. sent11: the hindrance is a hoe if that it is a kind of a Taricha and it is not avionics does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a Lotus and it is not enthusiastic does not hold then it is diagonalizable. sent13: if the fact that something does not denaturalize saltine and is not a fundamentalist does not hold it hoes. sent14: the fact that if the hindrance is avionics the hindrance is a kind of a hoe is true. sent15: if the hindrance is not a Taricha and it is not avionics then it is a hoe. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a Taricha it is a hoe. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__