the fact that the manifold is an exon and it is a Nestor if the infliximab is not a pollucite is not right.
sent1: the fact that the infliximab is a pollucite if the H-bomb is a Jimenez is not false. sent2: if something that is a Zeppelin is not parasitic then it is not an exon. sent3: if the fact that the H-bomb is a kind of a Zeppelin but it is not parasitic does not hold it is a Jimenez. sent4: that the manifold is a kind of a Jimenez but it is not a kind of a Nestor is not right. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a Pocatello and it does assume pyroscope does not hold. sent6: if the H-bomb is not an exon then the manifold is an exon and it is a Nestor. sent7: the fact that something is a Nestor and not an exon is not true if it does not assume pyroscope. sent8: something is a kind of an exon if the fact that it is a kind of a Nestor and it is not an exon is wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the H-bomb is a Zeppelin but it is not parasitic hold does not hold.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: that the H-bomb is a kind of a Jimenez hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the infliximab is a pollucite.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the infliximab is not a pollucite.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the H-bomb is a Zeppelin and is not parasitic.; sent2 -> int5: the H-bomb is not an exon if it is both a Zeppelin and not parasitic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the H-bomb is not an exon.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the manifold is an exon that is a kind of a Nestor.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the potpie is a pollucite.
sent8 -> int8: if the fact that the H-bomb is a Nestor but it is not an exon is not right then it is an exon.; sent7 -> int9: that the H-bomb is a Nestor but it is not an exon is not true if it does not assume pyroscope.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the manifold is an exon and it is a Nestor if the infliximab is not a pollucite is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the infliximab is a pollucite if the H-bomb is a Jimenez is not false. sent2: if something that is a Zeppelin is not parasitic then it is not an exon. sent3: if the fact that the H-bomb is a kind of a Zeppelin but it is not parasitic does not hold it is a Jimenez. sent4: that the manifold is a kind of a Jimenez but it is not a kind of a Nestor is not right. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a Pocatello and it does assume pyroscope does not hold. sent6: if the H-bomb is not an exon then the manifold is an exon and it is a Nestor. sent7: the fact that something is a Nestor and not an exon is not true if it does not assume pyroscope. sent8: something is a kind of an exon if the fact that it is a kind of a Nestor and it is not an exon is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the H-bomb is a Zeppelin but it is not parasitic hold does not hold.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: that the H-bomb is a kind of a Jimenez hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the infliximab is a pollucite.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the infliximab is not a pollucite.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the H-bomb is a Zeppelin and is not parasitic.; sent2 -> int5: the H-bomb is not an exon if it is both a Zeppelin and not parasitic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the H-bomb is not an exon.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the manifold is an exon that is a kind of a Nestor.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__