that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a cohesiveness then it is not unclear and it is not a triazolam does not hold.
sent1: if the Callas does reciprocate ouzo it is not a lighterman and it is not unclear. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a cohesiveness is not false it is not a triazolam. sent3: if the Callas is a cohesiveness it is not unclear. sent4: if the Callas is a kind of a myocardium then that it is not a cohesiveness and it does not welter is true. sent5: the Callas is not unclear and it is not a triazolam if it is a cohesiveness. sent6: if the belfry is defeasible then it does drowse pediment and is not a cohesiveness. sent7: there exists something such that if it is sculptural it is not a kind of a methenamine. sent8: there is something such that if it is practical then it is non-Nauruan. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a cohesiveness then it is clear thing that is a triazolam. sent10: something is not a kind of a in-joke and it is not a cohesiveness if it reciprocates ouzo. sent11: if something is unclear then it is not a superload and it is not a bivalve. sent12: the son-in-law is not a kind of a cicada and it is not a kind of a infuriation if it does spoof electrotherapist. sent13: the Callas is not a cohesiveness and it is not important if it is a kind of a cupel. sent14: if something is a cohesiveness that it does not spoof mausoleum and is not filial is not false. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a cohesiveness then it is unclear and is not a triazolam. sent16: if the Callas reciprocates distemper it is frozen thing that is not a kind of a succubus. sent17: the Callas is not unclear but a triazolam if it is a kind of a cohesiveness. sent18: there exists something such that if that it is a cohesiveness is right then it is not unclear.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the Uighur is not clear it is not a superload and is not a kind of a bivalve.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a cohesiveness then it is not unclear and it is not a triazolam does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Callas does reciprocate ouzo it is not a lighterman and it is not unclear. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a cohesiveness is not false it is not a triazolam. sent3: if the Callas is a cohesiveness it is not unclear. sent4: if the Callas is a kind of a myocardium then that it is not a cohesiveness and it does not welter is true. sent5: the Callas is not unclear and it is not a triazolam if it is a cohesiveness. sent6: if the belfry is defeasible then it does drowse pediment and is not a cohesiveness. sent7: there exists something such that if it is sculptural it is not a kind of a methenamine. sent8: there is something such that if it is practical then it is non-Nauruan. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a cohesiveness then it is clear thing that is a triazolam. sent10: something is not a kind of a in-joke and it is not a cohesiveness if it reciprocates ouzo. sent11: if something is unclear then it is not a superload and it is not a bivalve. sent12: the son-in-law is not a kind of a cicada and it is not a kind of a infuriation if it does spoof electrotherapist. sent13: the Callas is not a cohesiveness and it is not important if it is a kind of a cupel. sent14: if something is a cohesiveness that it does not spoof mausoleum and is not filial is not false. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a cohesiveness then it is unclear and is not a triazolam. sent16: if the Callas reciprocates distemper it is frozen thing that is not a kind of a succubus. sent17: the Callas is not unclear but a triazolam if it is a kind of a cohesiveness. sent18: there exists something such that if that it is a cohesiveness is right then it is not unclear. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__