the fact that not the trading but the synestheticness occurs is not correct.
sent1: the anaphrodisiacness occurs if the fact that the cowardliness does not occur is right. sent2: that the earthliness does not occur results in that the outfitting happens and the meteorologicness occurs. sent3: if the noncollapsibleness does not occur then the fact that not the trading but the synestheticness occurs is incorrect. sent4: that the outfitting happens is right. sent5: the meteorologicness does not occur if the actinicness does not occur. sent6: the noncollapsibleness happens. sent7: the anaphrodisiacness occurs. sent8: both the synestheticness and the anaphrodisiacness occurs if the cowardliness does not occur. sent9: if the homing occurs then that the anaphrodisiacness does not occur and/or the cowardliness occurs is false. sent10: if the outfitting does not occur the fact that the non-actinicness and the non-meteorologicness happens is incorrect. sent11: the outfitting happens if the earthliness does not occur. sent12: the earthliness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the cowardliness does not occur is right. sent14: the Socraticness and the eolithicness happens. sent15: that both the diamagneticness and the duplicity happens leads to that the existentness does not occur. sent16: the havoc occurs. sent17: if that the trading and the noncollapsibleness happens is right the actinicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trading happens.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: both the trading and the noncollapsibleness occurs.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the actinicness does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the meteorologicness does not occur.; sent2 & sent12 -> int4: both the outfitting and the meteorologicness happens.; int4 -> int5: the meteorologicness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the trading does not occur.; sent8 & sent13 -> int8: the synestheticness happens and the anaphrodisiacness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the synestheticness happens.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the trading does not occur but the synestheticness happens is false.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the trading but the synestheticness occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the anaphrodisiacness occurs if the fact that the cowardliness does not occur is right. sent2: that the earthliness does not occur results in that the outfitting happens and the meteorologicness occurs. sent3: if the noncollapsibleness does not occur then the fact that not the trading but the synestheticness occurs is incorrect. sent4: that the outfitting happens is right. sent5: the meteorologicness does not occur if the actinicness does not occur. sent6: the noncollapsibleness happens. sent7: the anaphrodisiacness occurs. sent8: both the synestheticness and the anaphrodisiacness occurs if the cowardliness does not occur. sent9: if the homing occurs then that the anaphrodisiacness does not occur and/or the cowardliness occurs is false. sent10: if the outfitting does not occur the fact that the non-actinicness and the non-meteorologicness happens is incorrect. sent11: the outfitting happens if the earthliness does not occur. sent12: the earthliness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the cowardliness does not occur is right. sent14: the Socraticness and the eolithicness happens. sent15: that both the diamagneticness and the duplicity happens leads to that the existentness does not occur. sent16: the havoc occurs. sent17: if that the trading and the noncollapsibleness happens is right the actinicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trading happens.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: both the trading and the noncollapsibleness occurs.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the actinicness does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the meteorologicness does not occur.; sent2 & sent12 -> int4: both the outfitting and the meteorologicness happens.; int4 -> int5: the meteorologicness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the trading does not occur.; sent8 & sent13 -> int8: the synestheticness happens and the anaphrodisiacness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the synestheticness happens.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__