the fact that there is something such that if it does not elute peanuts that it is not a blend and it is a irreligiousness is not true is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not deflationary that it is not an ideal and it is apocynaceous does not hold. sent2: that the jack-in-the-pulpit does not blend but it is a irreligiousness is not correct if it does not elute peanuts. sent3: if the glyph does not elute peanuts it is not yeasty and canes pretension. sent4: if something does not cane xerox that it is not independent and is a blend is not right. sent5: that the jack-in-the-pulpit is not a blend and is a irreligiousness does not hold if it elutes peanuts.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the pansy does not cane xerox the fact that it is not independent and it blends is incorrect.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not elute peanuts that it is not a blend and it is a irreligiousness is not true is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not deflationary that it is not an ideal and it is apocynaceous does not hold. sent2: that the jack-in-the-pulpit does not blend but it is a irreligiousness is not correct if it does not elute peanuts. sent3: if the glyph does not elute peanuts it is not yeasty and canes pretension. sent4: if something does not cane xerox that it is not independent and is a blend is not right. sent5: that the jack-in-the-pulpit is not a blend and is a irreligiousness does not hold if it elutes peanuts. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__