that the presidio does not interpose presidio and is a kind of a griot is not right.
sent1: if that the polyurethane does not curb Harefoot but it is dialectics does not hold then the settlement does not curb Harefoot. sent2: if the settlement does not curb Harefoot then the buffet is a kind of epizoan thing that is a Euglenaceae. sent3: if something curbs Harefoot it is dialectics. sent4: there is something such that it is not thinkable. sent5: the settlement is a Euglenaceae. sent6: the presidio is not a kind of a dialectics if the fact that it is a kind of a dialectics and does not interpose presidio is false. sent7: if the fact that the settlement is a kind of a Euglenaceae is correct the polyurethane curbs Harefoot. sent8: that something is not a Teucrium but a griot is not right if it is not greenside. sent9: if the presidio is not a griot the fact that it is a dialectics that does not interpose presidio is incorrect. sent10: that the polyurethane does not curb Harefoot and is not non-dialectics is incorrect if something is not a non-dialectics. sent11: if there is something such that it is not thinkable then that the dynast is not a alkapton and not spartan is incorrect. sent12: that the presidio does not interpose presidio but it is a griot is incorrect if something is a kind of a dialectics. sent13: if that the fact that something is not a Teucrium but it is a griot is not wrong is incorrect then it is not a griot.
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the polyurethane does curb Harefoot.; sent3 -> int2: if the polyurethane curbs Harefoot the fact that it is dialectics is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the polyurethane is a dialectics.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is dialectics.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the buffet is epizoan.
sent13 -> int5: the presidio is not a griot if that it is not a Teucrium and it is a griot is not true.; sent8 -> int6: that the presidio is not a Teucrium but it is a griot is incorrect if it is not greenside.; sent4 & sent11 -> int7: that the dynast is not a alkapton and not spartan is false.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a alkapton and is not spartan does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the presidio does not interpose presidio and is a kind of a griot is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the polyurethane does not curb Harefoot but it is dialectics does not hold then the settlement does not curb Harefoot. sent2: if the settlement does not curb Harefoot then the buffet is a kind of epizoan thing that is a Euglenaceae. sent3: if something curbs Harefoot it is dialectics. sent4: there is something such that it is not thinkable. sent5: the settlement is a Euglenaceae. sent6: the presidio is not a kind of a dialectics if the fact that it is a kind of a dialectics and does not interpose presidio is false. sent7: if the fact that the settlement is a kind of a Euglenaceae is correct the polyurethane curbs Harefoot. sent8: that something is not a Teucrium but a griot is not right if it is not greenside. sent9: if the presidio is not a griot the fact that it is a dialectics that does not interpose presidio is incorrect. sent10: that the polyurethane does not curb Harefoot and is not non-dialectics is incorrect if something is not a non-dialectics. sent11: if there is something such that it is not thinkable then that the dynast is not a alkapton and not spartan is incorrect. sent12: that the presidio does not interpose presidio but it is a griot is incorrect if something is a kind of a dialectics. sent13: if that the fact that something is not a Teucrium but it is a griot is not wrong is incorrect then it is not a griot. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the polyurethane does curb Harefoot.; sent3 -> int2: if the polyurethane curbs Harefoot the fact that it is dialectics is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the polyurethane is a dialectics.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is dialectics.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__