that the lover is a kind of a profit but it does not acquaint Husserl is not right.
sent1: the marmoset does acquaint divvy. sent2: the lover does profit but it does not acquaint Husserl if the saddlebill is not Platonistic. sent3: the fact that the belay is a Stewart and it is vesicular is not true if the Blackburn is not a Stewart. sent4: the saddlebill is not Platonistic if that the belay is a Stewart and not non-vesicular is wrong. sent5: if something that is not a kill acquaints divvy the Blackburn is a Lancastrian. sent6: the marmoset is not a pause. sent7: the Blackburn is not a kind of a kill. sent8: the lover does not acquaint Husserl if the saddlebill is not Platonistic. sent9: something is not a Stewart if it is Lancastrian. sent10: the marmoset is not a kill and does acquaint divvy if it is not a pause. sent11: the lover is vesicular if it does not acquaint Husserl.
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the marmoset does not kill and acquaints divvy.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a kill and acquaints divvy.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Blackburn is a Lancastrian.; sent9 -> int4: if the Blackburn is a Lancastrian then it is not a Stewart.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Blackburn is not a Stewart.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the belay is a kind of a Stewart that is vesicular is not right.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: that the saddlebill is not Platonistic is not incorrect.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the lover is a kind of a profit but it does not acquaint Husserl is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the marmoset does acquaint divvy. sent2: the lover does profit but it does not acquaint Husserl if the saddlebill is not Platonistic. sent3: the fact that the belay is a Stewart and it is vesicular is not true if the Blackburn is not a Stewart. sent4: the saddlebill is not Platonistic if that the belay is a Stewart and not non-vesicular is wrong. sent5: if something that is not a kill acquaints divvy the Blackburn is a Lancastrian. sent6: the marmoset is not a pause. sent7: the Blackburn is not a kind of a kill. sent8: the lover does not acquaint Husserl if the saddlebill is not Platonistic. sent9: something is not a Stewart if it is Lancastrian. sent10: the marmoset is not a kill and does acquaint divvy if it is not a pause. sent11: the lover is vesicular if it does not acquaint Husserl. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the marmoset does not kill and acquaints divvy.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a kill and acquaints divvy.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Blackburn is a Lancastrian.; sent9 -> int4: if the Blackburn is a Lancastrian then it is not a Stewart.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Blackburn is not a Stewart.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the belay is a kind of a Stewart that is vesicular is not right.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: that the saddlebill is not Platonistic is not incorrect.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__