the patchwork is a Bucconidae and is a Tragopogon.
sent1: the fact that the kitul is a NOAA and does not crucify Eight is incorrect if there is something such that it is a cookbook. sent2: something is a kind of a driving but it does not angle iproclozide if it does crucify Eight. sent3: the patchwork does not redden Champaign. sent4: something does redden Champaign. sent5: if the convictfish does not redden Champaign then the patchwork is a Bucconidae that is a Tragopogon. sent6: if a driving does not angle iproclozide then it is not a dimetrodon. sent7: something that is not a dimetrodon is immortal thing that angles Dunker. sent8: the convictfish is not a kind of a Bucconidae if there is something such that it reddens Champaign. sent9: there exists something such that it is a cookbook. sent10: if the convictfish is not a kind of a Bucconidae then that the patchwork is a Bucconidae and is a Tragopogon does not hold. sent11: there is something such that it is a kind of a Bucconidae. sent12: something crucifies Eight if that it is a NOAA and it does not crucifies Eight is wrong.
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the convictfish is not a Bucconidae.; sent10 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the patchwork is a Bucconidae and it is a Tragopogon.
sent7 -> int2: if that the kitul is not a kind of a dimetrodon is true then it is a kind of non-mortal thing that angles Dunker.; sent6 -> int3: if that the kitul drives and does not angle iproclozide is correct then it is not a dimetrodon.; sent2 -> int4: if the kitul does crucify Eight it is a kind of a driving that does not angle iproclozide.; sent12 -> int5: if the fact that the kitul is a NOAA and does not crucify Eight does not hold then it does crucify Eight.; sent9 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the kitul is a NOAA and does not crucify Eight is wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the kitul crucifies Eight.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the kitul is a kind of a driving that does not angle iproclozide.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the kitul is not a kind of a dimetrodon.; int2 & int9 -> int10: the kitul is not mortal and angles Dunker.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-mortal thing that does angle Dunker.;
$hypothesis$ = the patchwork is a Bucconidae and is a Tragopogon. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the kitul is a NOAA and does not crucify Eight is incorrect if there is something such that it is a cookbook. sent2: something is a kind of a driving but it does not angle iproclozide if it does crucify Eight. sent3: the patchwork does not redden Champaign. sent4: something does redden Champaign. sent5: if the convictfish does not redden Champaign then the patchwork is a Bucconidae that is a Tragopogon. sent6: if a driving does not angle iproclozide then it is not a dimetrodon. sent7: something that is not a dimetrodon is immortal thing that angles Dunker. sent8: the convictfish is not a kind of a Bucconidae if there is something such that it reddens Champaign. sent9: there exists something such that it is a cookbook. sent10: if the convictfish is not a kind of a Bucconidae then that the patchwork is a Bucconidae and is a Tragopogon does not hold. sent11: there is something such that it is a kind of a Bucconidae. sent12: something crucifies Eight if that it is a NOAA and it does not crucifies Eight is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the convictfish is not a Bucconidae.; sent10 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__