the farmland is a kind of a playboy.
sent1: something does sicken Masai if that it is a gnetum is correct. sent2: if the urceole is not yeasty or it is renewable or both the infielder is an abundance. sent3: the urceole is not yeasty and/or it is renewable. sent4: if that the infielder is a kind of an abundance is not wrong then the fact that that the microgliacyte does not attend and does not sicken Caribbean is not true hold. sent5: the farmland is a playboy but it does not sicken Masai if the fact that the culvert sicken Masai is not false.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the infielder is a kind of an abundance.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the microgliacyte does not attend and it does not sicken Caribbean is false.; sent1 -> int3: if the culvert is a gnetum that it sickens Masai is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the farmland is a kind of a playboy. ; $context$ = sent1: something does sicken Masai if that it is a gnetum is correct. sent2: if the urceole is not yeasty or it is renewable or both the infielder is an abundance. sent3: the urceole is not yeasty and/or it is renewable. sent4: if that the infielder is a kind of an abundance is not wrong then the fact that that the microgliacyte does not attend and does not sicken Caribbean is not true hold. sent5: the farmland is a playboy but it does not sicken Masai if the fact that the culvert sicken Masai is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the infielder is a kind of an abundance.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the microgliacyte does not attend and it does not sicken Caribbean is false.; sent1 -> int3: if the culvert is a gnetum that it sickens Masai is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__