the strip does not overawe cooking and it is not a crackpot.
sent1: something is not a crackpot if it does not overawe cooking. sent2: that the strip is a crackpot that does not overawe anarchist does not hold. sent3: the fact that the Khmer is a kind of a Morgan and is a preciseness is false if the escapologist is not a conservator. sent4: something is not a Morgan if it is not a preciseness. sent5: the kummel does not overawe anarchist and is not a kind of a hemosiderin. sent6: something is a conservator but it is not a Morgan if it is not a preciseness. sent7: the fiberscope is a kind of a crackpot but it is not a kind of a Morgan. sent8: if the kummel does not overawe anarchist and is not a hemosiderin the fiberscope is not a preciseness. sent9: if the escapologist is not a kind of a Morgan then the fact that the fiberscope is a kind of a conservator but it is not a Morgan is incorrect. sent10: if something is not a hemosiderin it does not overawe cooking. sent11: the strip is a conservator but it is not a crackpot if it does not overawe cooking. sent12: if the Khmer is a conservator the signalman is a conservator. sent13: that the fact that the strip does not overawe cooking and is a kind of a crackpot is not true if the Khmer is a kind of a crackpot hold. sent14: if the Khmer is a crackpot that the strip does not overawe cooking and is not a crackpot is not correct. sent15: if the Khmer is not a crackpot the escapologist is not a kind of a Morgan. sent16: the fiberscope is not a Morgan.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Khmer is not a crackpot.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the escapologist is not a Morgan.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the fiberscope is a conservator but it is not a Morgan does not hold.; sent6 -> int3: if the fiberscope is not a preciseness then it is a kind of a conservator and it is not a Morgan.; sent8 & sent5 -> int4: the fiberscope is not a preciseness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fiberscope is a conservator but it is not a Morgan.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Khmer is a crackpot.; int7 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the strip does not overawe cooking and is not a crackpot.
$hypothesis$ = the strip does not overawe cooking and it is not a crackpot. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a crackpot if it does not overawe cooking. sent2: that the strip is a crackpot that does not overawe anarchist does not hold. sent3: the fact that the Khmer is a kind of a Morgan and is a preciseness is false if the escapologist is not a conservator. sent4: something is not a Morgan if it is not a preciseness. sent5: the kummel does not overawe anarchist and is not a kind of a hemosiderin. sent6: something is a conservator but it is not a Morgan if it is not a preciseness. sent7: the fiberscope is a kind of a crackpot but it is not a kind of a Morgan. sent8: if the kummel does not overawe anarchist and is not a hemosiderin the fiberscope is not a preciseness. sent9: if the escapologist is not a kind of a Morgan then the fact that the fiberscope is a kind of a conservator but it is not a Morgan is incorrect. sent10: if something is not a hemosiderin it does not overawe cooking. sent11: the strip is a conservator but it is not a crackpot if it does not overawe cooking. sent12: if the Khmer is a conservator the signalman is a conservator. sent13: that the fact that the strip does not overawe cooking and is a kind of a crackpot is not true if the Khmer is a kind of a crackpot hold. sent14: if the Khmer is a crackpot that the strip does not overawe cooking and is not a crackpot is not correct. sent15: if the Khmer is not a crackpot the escapologist is not a kind of a Morgan. sent16: the fiberscope is not a Morgan. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Khmer is not a crackpot.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the escapologist is not a Morgan.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the fiberscope is a conservator but it is not a Morgan does not hold.; sent6 -> int3: if the fiberscope is not a preciseness then it is a kind of a conservator and it is not a Morgan.; sent8 & sent5 -> int4: the fiberscope is not a preciseness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fiberscope is a conservator but it is not a Morgan.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Khmer is a crackpot.; int7 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__