that the peridotite is a danaid is not incorrect.
sent1: the peridotite is a kind of a danaid if the sandwich is a danaid and does not unbar naughtiness. sent2: if something does not unbar David it constitutes. sent3: if the peridotite is a Verdicchio then the ilama is a kind of a danaid. sent4: the viewgraph does not skim peridotite. sent5: the peridotite is not a danaid but it is a perianth if there exists something such that it does not unbar naughtiness. sent6: everything does unbar bullfighting and is a anisogamete. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a perianth. sent8: the peridotite is a Rabat if something is not a perianth. sent9: the fact that either the thumb does not unbar David or it is not a kind of a musophobia or both is true. sent10: if that the viewgraph is not a kind of a Rabat but it is functional does not hold it does not unbar naughtiness. sent11: the thumb does constitute if it is not a kind of a musophobia. sent12: there exists nothing that is both not a Rabat and functional. sent13: if there exists something such that it unbars bullfighting the peridotite is a kind of a Verdicchio. sent14: if there exists something such that it constitutes then the sandwich is not a perianth and it is not client-server. sent15: if something that is a kind of a danaid does not unbar naughtiness it is not functional. sent16: the peridotite does not unbar ilama. sent17: there exists nothing such that it is not a perianth but functional. sent18: the steps is not a Albatrellus and is a Rabat.
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the viewgraph is not a Rabat but it is functional is wrong.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the viewgraph does not unbar naughtiness.; int2 -> int3: something does not unbar naughtiness.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the peridotite is not a danaid and is a perianth.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the peridotite is a danaid.
$hypothesis$ = that the peridotite is a danaid is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the peridotite is a kind of a danaid if the sandwich is a danaid and does not unbar naughtiness. sent2: if something does not unbar David it constitutes. sent3: if the peridotite is a Verdicchio then the ilama is a kind of a danaid. sent4: the viewgraph does not skim peridotite. sent5: the peridotite is not a danaid but it is a perianth if there exists something such that it does not unbar naughtiness. sent6: everything does unbar bullfighting and is a anisogamete. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a perianth. sent8: the peridotite is a Rabat if something is not a perianth. sent9: the fact that either the thumb does not unbar David or it is not a kind of a musophobia or both is true. sent10: if that the viewgraph is not a kind of a Rabat but it is functional does not hold it does not unbar naughtiness. sent11: the thumb does constitute if it is not a kind of a musophobia. sent12: there exists nothing that is both not a Rabat and functional. sent13: if there exists something such that it unbars bullfighting the peridotite is a kind of a Verdicchio. sent14: if there exists something such that it constitutes then the sandwich is not a perianth and it is not client-server. sent15: if something that is a kind of a danaid does not unbar naughtiness it is not functional. sent16: the peridotite does not unbar ilama. sent17: there exists nothing such that it is not a perianth but functional. sent18: the steps is not a Albatrellus and is a Rabat. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the viewgraph is not a Rabat but it is functional is wrong.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the viewgraph does not unbar naughtiness.; int2 -> int3: something does not unbar naughtiness.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the peridotite is not a danaid and is a perianth.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__