the fact that the sharpness but not the stampeding goulash occurs is false.
sent1: if the fact that the stampeding keratin does not occur but the nightwork occurs does not hold then the awnlessness happens. sent2: the technophilicness happens. sent3: the skit happens if the elementalness occurs. sent4: the demising anisogamete happens and the ossifying does not occur. sent5: if the technophilicness does not occur then the dislocation happens. sent6: the sharpness happens. sent7: that the imitation does not occur but the ancestralness occurs is false. sent8: the stampeding admiration occurs. sent9: the quarantining does not occur. sent10: the elementalness occurs. sent11: the demising Kaiser happens if the dislocation happens. sent12: the demising tabun happens if the clogging occurs. sent13: the quenching lawfulness occurs. sent14: the dislocation happens if that the stampeding admiration does not occur and the technophilicness occurs is false. sent15: not the nonsectarianness but the esophagealness occurs. sent16: that the stampeding goulash occurs is prevented by that the demising Kaiser and the skit occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the stampeding admiration but the technophilicness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the stampeding admiration does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the stampeding admiration does not occur but the technophilicness happens is wrong.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the dislocation happens.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the demising Kaiser happens.; sent3 & sent10 -> int6: the skit happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the demising Kaiser happens and the skit happens.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the stampeding goulash does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the imitation does not occur but the ancestralness occurs is false.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sharpness but not the stampeding goulash occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the stampeding keratin does not occur but the nightwork occurs does not hold then the awnlessness happens. sent2: the technophilicness happens. sent3: the skit happens if the elementalness occurs. sent4: the demising anisogamete happens and the ossifying does not occur. sent5: if the technophilicness does not occur then the dislocation happens. sent6: the sharpness happens. sent7: that the imitation does not occur but the ancestralness occurs is false. sent8: the stampeding admiration occurs. sent9: the quarantining does not occur. sent10: the elementalness occurs. sent11: the demising Kaiser happens if the dislocation happens. sent12: the demising tabun happens if the clogging occurs. sent13: the quenching lawfulness occurs. sent14: the dislocation happens if that the stampeding admiration does not occur and the technophilicness occurs is false. sent15: not the nonsectarianness but the esophagealness occurs. sent16: that the stampeding goulash occurs is prevented by that the demising Kaiser and the skit occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the stampeding admiration but the technophilicness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the stampeding admiration does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the stampeding admiration does not occur but the technophilicness happens is wrong.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the dislocation happens.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the demising Kaiser happens.; sent3 & sent10 -> int6: the skit happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the demising Kaiser happens and the skit happens.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the stampeding goulash does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__