the fact that the Nanticoke is not a nasalization is not incorrect.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not understand then the fact that either the Nanticoke is not a kindliness or it is a kind of an avoidance or both does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that it does not understand. sent3: the fact that the Atrovent is not a kindliness and/or it is a positive is not right. sent4: the Nanticoke is not a nasalization if the fact that it is a kindliness or it is an avoidance or both is false. sent5: if that something is a kind of a kindliness and/or it is an avoidance is wrong it is not a nasalization. sent6: something is a nasalization if it does understand.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: that the Nanticoke is not a kindliness and/or it is an avoidance is wrong.;
the Nanticoke is a kind of a nasalization.
sent6 -> int2: the Nanticoke is a nasalization if it understands.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Nanticoke is not a nasalization is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not understand then the fact that either the Nanticoke is not a kindliness or it is a kind of an avoidance or both does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that it does not understand. sent3: the fact that the Atrovent is not a kindliness and/or it is a positive is not right. sent4: the Nanticoke is not a nasalization if the fact that it is a kindliness or it is an avoidance or both is false. sent5: if that something is a kind of a kindliness and/or it is an avoidance is wrong it is not a nasalization. sent6: something is a nasalization if it does understand. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: that the Nanticoke is not a kindliness and/or it is an avoidance is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__