that the non-pyrrhicness is prevented by the pelvicness is false.
sent1: the squaring does not occur. sent2: that the benzoicness does not occur but the sigh happens prevents that the bryophyticness does not occur. sent3: the scaling stokehold does not occur. sent4: that the sensing happens is not incorrect. sent5: that the pyrrhicness occurs is triggered by that not the scaling stokehold but the pelvicness occurs. sent6: the hindrance happens. sent7: not the horse-drawnness but the acculturating occurs. sent8: the distending does not occur. sent9: that both the non-Stalinistness and the pro-lifeness happens prevents the non-multilaneness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pelvicness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the scaling stokehold does not occur and the pelvicness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the pyrrhic happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the non-pyrrhicness is prevented by the pelvicness is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the squaring does not occur. sent2: that the benzoicness does not occur but the sigh happens prevents that the bryophyticness does not occur. sent3: the scaling stokehold does not occur. sent4: that the sensing happens is not incorrect. sent5: that the pyrrhicness occurs is triggered by that not the scaling stokehold but the pelvicness occurs. sent6: the hindrance happens. sent7: not the horse-drawnness but the acculturating occurs. sent8: the distending does not occur. sent9: that both the non-Stalinistness and the pro-lifeness happens prevents the non-multilaneness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pelvicness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the scaling stokehold does not occur and the pelvicness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the pyrrhic happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__