the talking breakage happens and the rediscovery happens.
sent1: that the talking breakage and the rediscovery occurs is incorrect if the leveling does not occur. sent2: that the rediscovery happens is not incorrect. sent3: the sibilation does not occur. sent4: that the talking breakage does not occur is prevented by that the aposiopeticness occurs but the sibilation does not occur. sent5: the callus happens. sent6: both the level and the aposiopeticness happens. sent7: the level happens.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the aposiopeticness happens is right.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the aposiopeticness occurs and the sibilation does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the talking breakage happens is true.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the talking breakage and the rediscovery happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the talking breakage happens and the rediscovery happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the talking breakage and the rediscovery occurs is incorrect if the leveling does not occur. sent2: that the rediscovery happens is not incorrect. sent3: the sibilation does not occur. sent4: that the talking breakage does not occur is prevented by that the aposiopeticness occurs but the sibilation does not occur. sent5: the callus happens. sent6: both the level and the aposiopeticness happens. sent7: the level happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the aposiopeticness happens is right.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the aposiopeticness occurs and the sibilation does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the talking breakage happens is true.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__