the fact that the aureole is a piroplasm is not incorrect.
sent1: the aureole is not a venturer. sent2: if the prodigal is not a kind of a Woolf the fact that the aureole is not a piroplasm hold. sent3: the prodigal is a streamliner. sent4: the fact that the prodigal is Caroline and anastomotic is not correct. sent5: if the fact that something is not a venturer but it does lather chalkpit does not hold it is a venturer. sent6: if something is a venturer then it is a Ozawa. sent7: the BB hurtles Arikara. sent8: the fact that either the prodigal is not a kind of a Woolf or it is not a piroplasm or both is true if there is something such that it is not a Coerebidae. sent9: if the prodigal hurtles illicitness then the fact that it is both Caroline and anastomotic does not hold. sent10: if something is a kind of a reproducer the fact that it is not a venturer and lathers chalkpit is incorrect. sent11: if the prodigal does not hurtle illicitness then either the aureole is a streamliner or it is a Woolf or both. sent12: the prodigal is not anastomotic if the aureole is not a Coerebidae. sent13: if the BB hurtles Arikara the uncle is sensory. sent14: if something is a kind of a Coerebidae that is a Woolf then it is not a kind of a streamliner. sent15: the fact that the prodigal is Caroline but it is not anastomotic is not true if it hurtles illicitness. sent16: if the aureole is not a kind of a venturer then it is a kind of a Ozawa. sent17: something is a piroplasm if it is not a kind of a streamliner. sent18: the BB does not hurtle illicitness. sent19: The illicitness hurtles prodigal. sent20: the aureole is a Ozawa. sent21: the fact that something is not a kind of a streamliner and does hurtle illicitness is not right if it is a kind of a Ozawa. sent22: the uncle is not a venturer or it does not hurtle illicitness or both if there is something such that it does not hurtle illicitness. sent23: the aureole is a Woolf and it is a Ozawa if it is not a venturer. sent24: if the aureole is not a Coerebidae then the prodigal is Caroline thing that is not anastomotic. sent25: the fact that something is a reproducer if it is sensory is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aureole is not a kind of a Coerebidae.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the prodigal is Caroline and not anastomotic.; sent23 & sent1 -> int2: the aureole is a Woolf and a Ozawa.; int2 -> int3: the aureole is a Woolf.; sent14 -> int4: if the aureole is a Coerebidae and it is a Woolf then it is not a streamliner.; sent17 -> int5: the aureole is a kind of a piroplasm if it is not a streamliner.;
the hose is a piroplasm.
sent18 -> int6: there is something such that it does not hurtle illicitness.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the uncle is not a venturer and/or it does not hurtle illicitness.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the aureole is a piroplasm is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the aureole is not a venturer. sent2: if the prodigal is not a kind of a Woolf the fact that the aureole is not a piroplasm hold. sent3: the prodigal is a streamliner. sent4: the fact that the prodigal is Caroline and anastomotic is not correct. sent5: if the fact that something is not a venturer but it does lather chalkpit does not hold it is a venturer. sent6: if something is a venturer then it is a Ozawa. sent7: the BB hurtles Arikara. sent8: the fact that either the prodigal is not a kind of a Woolf or it is not a piroplasm or both is true if there is something such that it is not a Coerebidae. sent9: if the prodigal hurtles illicitness then the fact that it is both Caroline and anastomotic does not hold. sent10: if something is a kind of a reproducer the fact that it is not a venturer and lathers chalkpit is incorrect. sent11: if the prodigal does not hurtle illicitness then either the aureole is a streamliner or it is a Woolf or both. sent12: the prodigal is not anastomotic if the aureole is not a Coerebidae. sent13: if the BB hurtles Arikara the uncle is sensory. sent14: if something is a kind of a Coerebidae that is a Woolf then it is not a kind of a streamliner. sent15: the fact that the prodigal is Caroline but it is not anastomotic is not true if it hurtles illicitness. sent16: if the aureole is not a kind of a venturer then it is a kind of a Ozawa. sent17: something is a piroplasm if it is not a kind of a streamliner. sent18: the BB does not hurtle illicitness. sent19: The illicitness hurtles prodigal. sent20: the aureole is a Ozawa. sent21: the fact that something is not a kind of a streamliner and does hurtle illicitness is not right if it is a kind of a Ozawa. sent22: the uncle is not a venturer or it does not hurtle illicitness or both if there is something such that it does not hurtle illicitness. sent23: the aureole is a Woolf and it is a Ozawa if it is not a venturer. sent24: if the aureole is not a Coerebidae then the prodigal is Caroline thing that is not anastomotic. sent25: the fact that something is a reproducer if it is sensory is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aureole is not a kind of a Coerebidae.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the prodigal is Caroline and not anastomotic.; sent23 & sent1 -> int2: the aureole is a Woolf and a Ozawa.; int2 -> int3: the aureole is a Woolf.; sent14 -> int4: if the aureole is a Coerebidae and it is a Woolf then it is not a streamliner.; sent17 -> int5: the aureole is a kind of a piroplasm if it is not a streamliner.; __UNKNOWN__