the belch does not occur.
sent1: the intersection happens and the persecution happens if the single-laneness does not occur. sent2: that the interpretation occurs and the neglecting meekness occurs is incorrect. sent3: if that that the belch but not the interpretation happens is true is not right then the fact that the autoeciousness happens is right. sent4: the relativeness does not occur. sent5: if the intersection does not occur then that the neglecting meekness and the persecution happens is wrong. sent6: either the walkover does not occur or the neglecting wanton does not occur or both if the horseplay does not occur. sent7: the interpretation does not occur if that both the interpretation and the neglecting meekness happens is not true. sent8: the studding Soma occurs if the fenestration occurs. sent9: the neglecting meekness does not occur if the fact that the neglecting meekness occurs and the persecution occurs does not hold. sent10: that the intersection does not occur is caused by that both the single-laneness and the neglecting wanton occurs. sent11: the fact that the fact that the acceding and the neglecting ascospore occurs is not right is not false. sent12: the Mishnaicness does not occur. sent13: the interpretation happens if the belch occurs. sent14: if the neglecting meekness does not occur then the interpretation happens or the responding happens or both. sent15: the serigraphy does not occur. sent16: both the concordance and the single-laneness happens. sent17: if the intersection happens not the responding but the neglecting meekness happens. sent18: the nurse does not occur if the fact that the nurse occurs and the serigraphy happens does not hold. sent19: if that the responding does not occur is correct that the belch but not the interpretation happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the belch happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the interpretation occurs.; sent7 & sent2 -> int2: the interpretation does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the autoeciousness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the belch does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the intersection happens and the persecution happens if the single-laneness does not occur. sent2: that the interpretation occurs and the neglecting meekness occurs is incorrect. sent3: if that that the belch but not the interpretation happens is true is not right then the fact that the autoeciousness happens is right. sent4: the relativeness does not occur. sent5: if the intersection does not occur then that the neglecting meekness and the persecution happens is wrong. sent6: either the walkover does not occur or the neglecting wanton does not occur or both if the horseplay does not occur. sent7: the interpretation does not occur if that both the interpretation and the neglecting meekness happens is not true. sent8: the studding Soma occurs if the fenestration occurs. sent9: the neglecting meekness does not occur if the fact that the neglecting meekness occurs and the persecution occurs does not hold. sent10: that the intersection does not occur is caused by that both the single-laneness and the neglecting wanton occurs. sent11: the fact that the fact that the acceding and the neglecting ascospore occurs is not right is not false. sent12: the Mishnaicness does not occur. sent13: the interpretation happens if the belch occurs. sent14: if the neglecting meekness does not occur then the interpretation happens or the responding happens or both. sent15: the serigraphy does not occur. sent16: both the concordance and the single-laneness happens. sent17: if the intersection happens not the responding but the neglecting meekness happens. sent18: the nurse does not occur if the fact that the nurse occurs and the serigraphy happens does not hold. sent19: if that the responding does not occur is correct that the belch but not the interpretation happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the belch happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the interpretation occurs.; sent7 & sent2 -> int2: the interpretation does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__