the F sneaks.
sent1: the F does drape zapper. sent2: if the fact that something does not drape zapper and/or it is Kafkaesque does not hold it is not a kind of a sneak. sent3: the F is a sneak if that it is not a dig and it does not sneak is not true. sent4: the F is not a yodel if that it rewrites craniometer and/or it is Kafkaesque is false. sent5: the F is not a dig if there is something such that it is monocarpic. sent6: the F is not residuary if the fact that it is not a flip or unselfish or both is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of residuary thing that is not monocarpic is wrong. sent8: the fact that something does not drape zapper and/or it is not non-Kafkaesque is false if it is not a kind of a dig. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a sulfamethoxazole and it does not drape zapper is false then the F is not lung-like. sent10: if the fact that something is Kafkaesque thing that is not a bassoonist is wrong it is not Kafkaesque. sent11: something does not interpret if that it does not sink and/or it is a kind of a Kichai is false. sent12: if the fact that the F is not a kind of a personal and/or is melodic is not correct it does not counterpoint roadhouse. sent13: if that the craniometer is a kind of a supremacist and/or it does drape zapper is not right it is not mechanistic. sent14: there exists something such that that that it is both not residuary and not monocarpic hold does not hold. sent15: that the F is not a dig is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it is not residuary and it is not monocarpic is not correct. sent16: there is something such that that it is not residuary but monocarpic is not true. sent17: there is something such that that it does not sophisticate feature and does not sophisticate hysteric is not right.
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the F is not a dig.; sent8 -> int2: that the fact that the F does not drape zapper and/or it is Kafkaesque is not true if the F is not a dig is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the F does not drape zapper and/or is Kafkaesque is not right.; sent2 -> int4: the F is not a sneak if that it does not drape zapper and/or is Kafkaesque does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the F is a kind of a sneak.
sent10 -> int5: the F is not Kafkaesque if that it is Kafkaesque and not a bassoonist is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the F sneaks. ; $context$ = sent1: the F does drape zapper. sent2: if the fact that something does not drape zapper and/or it is Kafkaesque does not hold it is not a kind of a sneak. sent3: the F is a sneak if that it is not a dig and it does not sneak is not true. sent4: the F is not a yodel if that it rewrites craniometer and/or it is Kafkaesque is false. sent5: the F is not a dig if there is something such that it is monocarpic. sent6: the F is not residuary if the fact that it is not a flip or unselfish or both is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of residuary thing that is not monocarpic is wrong. sent8: the fact that something does not drape zapper and/or it is not non-Kafkaesque is false if it is not a kind of a dig. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a sulfamethoxazole and it does not drape zapper is false then the F is not lung-like. sent10: if the fact that something is Kafkaesque thing that is not a bassoonist is wrong it is not Kafkaesque. sent11: something does not interpret if that it does not sink and/or it is a kind of a Kichai is false. sent12: if the fact that the F is not a kind of a personal and/or is melodic is not correct it does not counterpoint roadhouse. sent13: if that the craniometer is a kind of a supremacist and/or it does drape zapper is not right it is not mechanistic. sent14: there exists something such that that that it is both not residuary and not monocarpic hold does not hold. sent15: that the F is not a dig is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it is not residuary and it is not monocarpic is not correct. sent16: there is something such that that it is not residuary but monocarpic is not true. sent17: there is something such that that it does not sophisticate feature and does not sophisticate hysteric is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the F is not a dig.; sent8 -> int2: that the fact that the F does not drape zapper and/or it is Kafkaesque is not true if the F is not a dig is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the F does not drape zapper and/or is Kafkaesque is not right.; sent2 -> int4: the F is not a sneak if that it does not drape zapper and/or is Kafkaesque does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__