the fact that that the recusation happens and the unveiling Pempheridae does not occur is incorrect if the reducing happens does not hold.
sent1: the sententialness occurs if the illegibleness happens. sent2: if the falsifying Judith occurs and the scallop occurs the epigastricness does not occur. sent3: that the recusation but not the unveiling Pempheridae occurs is brought about by that the reducing occurs. sent4: if the cumulonimbus does not occur the fact that the fact that both the recusation and the unveiling Pempheridae occurs is true is not right. sent5: the fact that the illegibleness occurs or the uttering telomerase occurs or both is right. sent6: the accountancy but not the sobering occurs if the fact that the tunelessness does not occur is not false. sent7: the cumulonimbus does not occur if the sententialness and the reducing occurs. sent8: the fact that both the dating nan and the non-Macedonianness happens is not true if the unveiling FAA occurs. sent9: if the cumulonimbus does not occur the fact that the recusation occurs but the unveiling Pempheridae does not occur is wrong. sent10: that the sententialness occurs is brought about by that the uttering telomerase occurs. sent11: the fact that the fact that the bolero but not the deference happens is wrong is right. sent12: the comfortableness and the Moon occurs.
sent5 & sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the sententialness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reducing happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sententialness and the reducing occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the cumulonimbus does not occur is correct.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the recusation but not the unveiling Pempheridae occurs does not hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the recusation happens and the unveiling Pempheridae does not occur is incorrect if the reducing happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the sententialness occurs if the illegibleness happens. sent2: if the falsifying Judith occurs and the scallop occurs the epigastricness does not occur. sent3: that the recusation but not the unveiling Pempheridae occurs is brought about by that the reducing occurs. sent4: if the cumulonimbus does not occur the fact that the fact that both the recusation and the unveiling Pempheridae occurs is true is not right. sent5: the fact that the illegibleness occurs or the uttering telomerase occurs or both is right. sent6: the accountancy but not the sobering occurs if the fact that the tunelessness does not occur is not false. sent7: the cumulonimbus does not occur if the sententialness and the reducing occurs. sent8: the fact that both the dating nan and the non-Macedonianness happens is not true if the unveiling FAA occurs. sent9: if the cumulonimbus does not occur the fact that the recusation occurs but the unveiling Pempheridae does not occur is wrong. sent10: that the sententialness occurs is brought about by that the uttering telomerase occurs. sent11: the fact that the fact that the bolero but not the deference happens is wrong is right. sent12: the comfortableness and the Moon occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the sententialness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reducing happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sententialness and the reducing occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the cumulonimbus does not occur is correct.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the recusation but not the unveiling Pempheridae occurs does not hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__