the bascule is many.
sent1: if either the leveret is not a chlorate or it is not a nonconformist or both then the proximity is not amitotic. sent2: either something is amitotic or it is many or both. sent3: the proximity is not amitotic if the leveret is not a kind of a chlorate. sent4: if the fact that something is not a kind of a supervention is correct either the leveret is not a chlorate or it is not a kind of a nonconformist or both. sent5: the fact that the leveret is nonconformist or a pledgee or both is not right if the fact that the hobbyhorse is not a pledgee is correct. sent6: there is something such that it does not hunger astatine. sent7: the leveret is a chlorate or it is not a kind of a nonconformist or both if something is not a supervention. sent8: something is not monetary. sent9: something is monetary and/or does hunger astatine. sent10: the hobbyhorse is not a chlorate. sent11: that that either the vascularization is a kind of a prescription or it is amitotic or both is not true is true. sent12: the chit is not a supervention. sent13: if the fact that the hobbyhorse is a kind of a pledgee and/or it is amitotic is not true it is not monetary. sent14: there is something such that it is a kind of a supervention. sent15: if the proximity is not amitotic the hobbyhorse is not a kind of a pledgee. sent16: if the leveret is not a chlorate then it is both a supervention and a nonconformist. sent17: the fact that the waterfall is monetary or it does hunger astatine or both is not true if the hobbyhorse is not monetary. sent18: the fact that the chit is a kind of a Transportation and/or it divests does not hold. sent19: the bascule is not many if there exists something such that that it is monetary or does hunger astatine or both is wrong. sent20: the leveret is a kind of a chlorate and/or is not a nonconformist. sent21: if the proximity is not amitotic then the fact that the hobbyhorse is a kind of a pledgee and/or is amitotic does not hold. sent22: the waterfall is not monetary if the hobbyhorse is not monetary.
sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a supervention.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the leveret is not a chlorate or it is not a nonconformist or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the proximity is not amitotic.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the hobbyhorse is a kind of a pledgee or it is amitotic or both is wrong.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the hobbyhorse is not monetary.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the waterfall is monetary or does hunger astatine or both is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is monetary and/or it does hunger astatine is incorrect.; int7 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the bascule is many.
$hypothesis$ = the bascule is many. ; $context$ = sent1: if either the leveret is not a chlorate or it is not a nonconformist or both then the proximity is not amitotic. sent2: either something is amitotic or it is many or both. sent3: the proximity is not amitotic if the leveret is not a kind of a chlorate. sent4: if the fact that something is not a kind of a supervention is correct either the leveret is not a chlorate or it is not a kind of a nonconformist or both. sent5: the fact that the leveret is nonconformist or a pledgee or both is not right if the fact that the hobbyhorse is not a pledgee is correct. sent6: there is something such that it does not hunger astatine. sent7: the leveret is a chlorate or it is not a kind of a nonconformist or both if something is not a supervention. sent8: something is not monetary. sent9: something is monetary and/or does hunger astatine. sent10: the hobbyhorse is not a chlorate. sent11: that that either the vascularization is a kind of a prescription or it is amitotic or both is not true is true. sent12: the chit is not a supervention. sent13: if the fact that the hobbyhorse is a kind of a pledgee and/or it is amitotic is not true it is not monetary. sent14: there is something such that it is a kind of a supervention. sent15: if the proximity is not amitotic the hobbyhorse is not a kind of a pledgee. sent16: if the leveret is not a chlorate then it is both a supervention and a nonconformist. sent17: the fact that the waterfall is monetary or it does hunger astatine or both is not true if the hobbyhorse is not monetary. sent18: the fact that the chit is a kind of a Transportation and/or it divests does not hold. sent19: the bascule is not many if there exists something such that that it is monetary or does hunger astatine or both is wrong. sent20: the leveret is a kind of a chlorate and/or is not a nonconformist. sent21: if the proximity is not amitotic then the fact that the hobbyhorse is a kind of a pledgee and/or is amitotic does not hold. sent22: the waterfall is not monetary if the hobbyhorse is not monetary. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a supervention.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the leveret is not a chlorate or it is not a nonconformist or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the proximity is not amitotic.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the hobbyhorse is a kind of a pledgee or it is amitotic or both is wrong.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the hobbyhorse is not monetary.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the waterfall is monetary or does hunger astatine or both is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is monetary and/or it does hunger astatine is incorrect.; int7 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__