there is something such that it is not a climber.
sent1: if the marmalade does not depart the fact that either the flatlet does not bespangle Adapid or it is a toucanet or both is not true. sent2: if the flatlet does japan demonization it does not bespangle Adapid and/or it is a kind of a toucanet. sent3: the marmalade does not depart. sent4: if the petcock rabbits the eristic is not a climber. sent5: if the flatlet does japan demonization then it does bespangle Adapid or is a toucanet or both. sent6: if the petcock is not arenicolous then the fact that it does depart and it is not a dissociation is wrong. sent7: if the fact that something is disintegrative and/or japans demonization is false it is not a dissociation. sent8: the fact that the marmalade either is not a kind of a dissociation or does bespangle Adapid or both is wrong if that the flatlet does not depart is right. sent9: the flatlet does not bespangle Adapid if the petcock does not bespangle Adapid. sent10: that the petcock is not a toucanet but it does rabbit is wrong. sent11: the eristic is not a kind of a climber if the fact that the petcock is not arenicolous and it is not a kind of a rabbit is not true. sent12: the fact that the kawaka is not a fluency and/or it japans marauder is not right. sent13: if the fact that the flatlet does not japan demonization is true then that the petcock is disintegrative and/or it japan demonization is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flatlet japans demonization.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the flatlet does not bespangle Adapid and/or is a toucanet.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: that the flatlet does not bespangle Adapid and/or it is a kind of a toucanet is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the flatlet does not japan demonization.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the petcock is disintegrative and/or it japans demonization is wrong.; sent7 -> int6: the petcock is not a dissociation if that it is disintegrative or does japan demonization or both is not right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the petcock is not a dissociation.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not a climber. ; $context$ = sent1: if the marmalade does not depart the fact that either the flatlet does not bespangle Adapid or it is a toucanet or both is not true. sent2: if the flatlet does japan demonization it does not bespangle Adapid and/or it is a kind of a toucanet. sent3: the marmalade does not depart. sent4: if the petcock rabbits the eristic is not a climber. sent5: if the flatlet does japan demonization then it does bespangle Adapid or is a toucanet or both. sent6: if the petcock is not arenicolous then the fact that it does depart and it is not a dissociation is wrong. sent7: if the fact that something is disintegrative and/or japans demonization is false it is not a dissociation. sent8: the fact that the marmalade either is not a kind of a dissociation or does bespangle Adapid or both is wrong if that the flatlet does not depart is right. sent9: the flatlet does not bespangle Adapid if the petcock does not bespangle Adapid. sent10: that the petcock is not a toucanet but it does rabbit is wrong. sent11: the eristic is not a kind of a climber if the fact that the petcock is not arenicolous and it is not a kind of a rabbit is not true. sent12: the fact that the kawaka is not a fluency and/or it japans marauder is not right. sent13: if the fact that the flatlet does not japan demonization is true then that the petcock is disintegrative and/or it japan demonization is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flatlet japans demonization.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the flatlet does not bespangle Adapid and/or is a toucanet.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: that the flatlet does not bespangle Adapid and/or it is a kind of a toucanet is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the flatlet does not japan demonization.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the petcock is disintegrative and/or it japans demonization is wrong.; sent7 -> int6: the petcock is not a dissociation if that it is disintegrative or does japan demonization or both is not right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the petcock is not a dissociation.; __UNKNOWN__