if the broadcaster is not subclinical then the fact that the Peacemaker is not austenitic or it is a grimoire or both is not right.
sent1: if the udder does mystify fossilization it is unifilar. sent2: if the labyrinthodont is not austenitic that the Peacemaker is not austenitic and/or it is a kind of a grimoire is not right. sent3: the AMP is not a danish if the broadcaster is soleless. sent4: the fact that that the broadcaster is not the isobutylene is not false if the broadcaster is not subclinical is not wrong. sent5: the AMP is soleless but it is not a danish if the broadcaster is soleless. sent6: if the broadcaster is not subclinical it is amphitropous and it is not a isobutylene. sent7: that if there exists something such that it is soleless and it instruments Bunsen then the labyrinthodont is not austenitic is not incorrect. sent8: the udder does mystify fossilization if it is drupaceous. sent9: the broadcaster is austenitic if the fact that the AMP is not austenitic and is not soleless is not right. sent10: the AMP instruments Bunsen if the udder is unifilar. sent11: the labyrinthodont is not a grimoire but it is a kind of a danish. sent12: the udder is a kind of drupaceous thing that is fishy. sent13: the fact that the fact that something is not austenitic and it is not soleless is correct is not right if it is subclinical.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadcaster is not subclinical.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the broadcaster is both amphitropous and not a isobutylene.; sent12 -> int2: the udder is drupaceous.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the udder mystifies fossilization.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the udder is not non-unifilar.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the AMP does instrument Bunsen.;
the fact that the broadcaster is austenitic is right.
sent13 -> int6: if the AMP is subclinical then the fact that it is not austenitic and it is not soleless does not hold.; sent11 -> int7: the labyrinthodont is a kind of a danish.; int7 -> int8: something is a danish.;
$hypothesis$ = if the broadcaster is not subclinical then the fact that the Peacemaker is not austenitic or it is a grimoire or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the udder does mystify fossilization it is unifilar. sent2: if the labyrinthodont is not austenitic that the Peacemaker is not austenitic and/or it is a kind of a grimoire is not right. sent3: the AMP is not a danish if the broadcaster is soleless. sent4: the fact that that the broadcaster is not the isobutylene is not false if the broadcaster is not subclinical is not wrong. sent5: the AMP is soleless but it is not a danish if the broadcaster is soleless. sent6: if the broadcaster is not subclinical it is amphitropous and it is not a isobutylene. sent7: that if there exists something such that it is soleless and it instruments Bunsen then the labyrinthodont is not austenitic is not incorrect. sent8: the udder does mystify fossilization if it is drupaceous. sent9: the broadcaster is austenitic if the fact that the AMP is not austenitic and is not soleless is not right. sent10: the AMP instruments Bunsen if the udder is unifilar. sent11: the labyrinthodont is not a grimoire but it is a kind of a danish. sent12: the udder is a kind of drupaceous thing that is fishy. sent13: the fact that the fact that something is not austenitic and it is not soleless is correct is not right if it is subclinical. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadcaster is not subclinical.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the broadcaster is both amphitropous and not a isobutylene.; sent12 -> int2: the udder is drupaceous.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the udder mystifies fossilization.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the udder is not non-unifilar.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the AMP does instrument Bunsen.; __UNKNOWN__