there is something such that if the fact that it sedates and is unsociable is incorrect it does not subject Ascaphidae.
sent1: the fact that the wheatgrass is not a kingcup hold if it is not a gelatin. sent2: if the fact that something is eukaryotic and is a sneer is wrong it is not bistroic. sent3: if the wheatgrass does not sedate then it does not subject Tussaud. sent4: there is something such that if it is imperfect and it is cryogenics it is not dumpy. sent5: the fact that if that the wheatgrass sedates and is unsociable is not true the wheatgrass does not subject Ascaphidae is not wrong.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the rendezvous is not bistroic if that it is eukaryotic and it does sneer is not correct.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it sedates and is unsociable is incorrect it does not subject Ascaphidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the wheatgrass is not a kingcup hold if it is not a gelatin. sent2: if the fact that something is eukaryotic and is a sneer is wrong it is not bistroic. sent3: if the wheatgrass does not sedate then it does not subject Tussaud. sent4: there is something such that if it is imperfect and it is cryogenics it is not dumpy. sent5: the fact that if that the wheatgrass sedates and is unsociable is not true the wheatgrass does not subject Ascaphidae is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__