the confusing memo does not occur and the corporatist does not occur.
sent1: that the hum does not occur is caused by that the fronting Thrace happens or that the fraudulence occurs or both. sent2: that the rule happens is right. sent3: the jeer happens and/or the pick occurs. sent4: the confusing rhodanthe happens. sent5: if that not the fronting lamppost but the repining PFLP-GC occurs is incorrect then the corporatist does not occur. sent6: both the fraudulence and the Palestinian occurs. sent7: both the hockey and the cross-linguisticness happens. sent8: that the confusing memo does not occur and the corporatistness does not occur does not hold if the hockey does not occur. sent9: that the sandblasting happens is prevented by that the acousticsness and the lashing happens. sent10: the fact that the fact that not the concerting but the untwining happens is correct does not hold. sent11: both the acoustics and the lashing happens. sent12: that the confusing memo does not occur is brought about by the unrecoverableness. sent13: that that the hockey happens or that the unrecoverableness happens or both hold leads to that the confusing memo does not occur. sent14: the corporatistness is prevented by that the repining PFLP-GC does not occur. sent15: that the fronting lamppost does not occur but the repining PFLP-GC happens is not true if the sandblasting does not occur. sent16: if that the repining PFLP-GC does not occur hold then the fact that the non-cross-linguisticness and the unrecoverableness occurs is wrong. sent17: the cross-linguisticness happens. sent18: if the fact that the fronting stannite does not occur hold the fact that the fact that the miniaturization does not occur but the ESM occurs is not right is not false. sent19: if the fact that the spring does not occur and the pegging Eris occurs is wrong then the fact that the catachresticness does not occur hold.
sent7 -> int1: the hockey occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the hockey or the unrecoverableness or both occurs.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the confusing memo does not occur.; sent9 & sent11 -> int4: the sandblasting does not occur.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: that not the fronting lamppost but the repining PFLP-GC happens is false.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the corporatistness does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the confusing memo does not occur and the corporatist does not occur is false.
$hypothesis$ = the confusing memo does not occur and the corporatist does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the hum does not occur is caused by that the fronting Thrace happens or that the fraudulence occurs or both. sent2: that the rule happens is right. sent3: the jeer happens and/or the pick occurs. sent4: the confusing rhodanthe happens. sent5: if that not the fronting lamppost but the repining PFLP-GC occurs is incorrect then the corporatist does not occur. sent6: both the fraudulence and the Palestinian occurs. sent7: both the hockey and the cross-linguisticness happens. sent8: that the confusing memo does not occur and the corporatistness does not occur does not hold if the hockey does not occur. sent9: that the sandblasting happens is prevented by that the acousticsness and the lashing happens. sent10: the fact that the fact that not the concerting but the untwining happens is correct does not hold. sent11: both the acoustics and the lashing happens. sent12: that the confusing memo does not occur is brought about by the unrecoverableness. sent13: that that the hockey happens or that the unrecoverableness happens or both hold leads to that the confusing memo does not occur. sent14: the corporatistness is prevented by that the repining PFLP-GC does not occur. sent15: that the fronting lamppost does not occur but the repining PFLP-GC happens is not true if the sandblasting does not occur. sent16: if that the repining PFLP-GC does not occur hold then the fact that the non-cross-linguisticness and the unrecoverableness occurs is wrong. sent17: the cross-linguisticness happens. sent18: if the fact that the fronting stannite does not occur hold the fact that the fact that the miniaturization does not occur but the ESM occurs is not right is not false. sent19: if the fact that the spring does not occur and the pegging Eris occurs is wrong then the fact that the catachresticness does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the hockey occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the hockey or the unrecoverableness or both occurs.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the confusing memo does not occur.; sent9 & sent11 -> int4: the sandblasting does not occur.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: that not the fronting lamppost but the repining PFLP-GC happens is false.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the corporatistness does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__