the showerhead does disharmonize.
sent1: that the floater is a kind of non-Malthusian thing that is empirical is wrong if it ferments karaoke. sent2: the floater homologizes and is a kind of a teardrop if something is a gangplank. sent3: the floater is a kind of a teardrop and it disharmonizes. sent4: the showerhead is a domestic. sent5: everything ferments karaoke or it is a domestic or both. sent6: the fact that the floater is empirical if the floater does homologize is not wrong. sent7: the floater is a teardrop. sent8: if the cereal ferments karaoke then the floater does ferments karaoke. sent9: if the citronwood does not ferment karaoke and is a domestic then the showerhead disharmonizes. sent10: the citronwood does not ferment karaoke and is a domestic if the cereal is a kind of a Malthusian. sent11: if something is not a teardrop then the fact that it is not a gangplank and it homologizes hold. sent12: there exists something such that it is a gangplank.
sent12 & sent2 -> int1: the floater does homologize and is a kind of a teardrop.; int1 -> int2: the floater homologizes.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the floater is empirical.;
that the showerhead does not disharmonize hold.
sent11 -> int4: the floater is not a gangplank but it does homologize if the fact that it is not a kind of a teardrop hold.; sent5 -> int5: the cereal ferments karaoke and/or it is a domestic.;
$hypothesis$ = the showerhead does disharmonize. ; $context$ = sent1: that the floater is a kind of non-Malthusian thing that is empirical is wrong if it ferments karaoke. sent2: the floater homologizes and is a kind of a teardrop if something is a gangplank. sent3: the floater is a kind of a teardrop and it disharmonizes. sent4: the showerhead is a domestic. sent5: everything ferments karaoke or it is a domestic or both. sent6: the fact that the floater is empirical if the floater does homologize is not wrong. sent7: the floater is a teardrop. sent8: if the cereal ferments karaoke then the floater does ferments karaoke. sent9: if the citronwood does not ferment karaoke and is a domestic then the showerhead disharmonizes. sent10: the citronwood does not ferment karaoke and is a domestic if the cereal is a kind of a Malthusian. sent11: if something is not a teardrop then the fact that it is not a gangplank and it homologizes hold. sent12: there exists something such that it is a gangplank. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent2 -> int1: the floater does homologize and is a kind of a teardrop.; int1 -> int2: the floater homologizes.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the floater is empirical.; __UNKNOWN__