the fact that the Voltaren is defervescent and/or it is not an egg is wrong.
sent1: the opepe keratinizes Elymus and/or is not defervescent. sent2: the Voltaren does hum Tampico. sent3: the fact that the Voltaren is a toxemia and it is a kind of a hatchel is not right. sent4: if the fact that something is both not a 24/7 and a shoot-down is incorrect it is not a kind of a hatchel. sent5: the meitnerium is a shoot-down. sent6: that something is both not avionic and not a 24/7 is incorrect if it is a shoot-down. sent7: the Voltaren is defervescent and/or it is a dotage. sent8: the Voltaren is a Phasianus or is not Ethiopian or both. sent9: if the fact that something is defervescent and/or it is not a kind of a hatchel is not true then it is a toxemia. sent10: something is a toxemia if the fact that it is defervescent or is not a kind of an egg or both is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the Voltaren is a toxemia and it is a kind of a hatchel is incorrect it is not a kind of a toxemia. sent12: the fact that the meitnerium is not a 24/7 and is a shoot-down is wrong if the folder is not avionic. sent13: if something is a 24/7 then it is not a hatchel and is not a kind of a toxemia. sent14: that something is either defervescent or not an egg or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a hatchel.
sent10 -> int1: the Voltaren is a toxemia if that it is defervescent and/or not an egg is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Voltaren is defervescent and/or is not an egg is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Voltaren is a kind of a toxemia.; sent11 & sent3 -> int3: the Voltaren is not a toxemia.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the stagehand is a kind of a toxemia and/or it is not a kind of a archespore.
sent4 -> int5: if that the meitnerium is not a 24/7 and is a shoot-down is incorrect it is not a kind of a hatchel.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Voltaren is defervescent and/or it is not an egg is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the opepe keratinizes Elymus and/or is not defervescent. sent2: the Voltaren does hum Tampico. sent3: the fact that the Voltaren is a toxemia and it is a kind of a hatchel is not right. sent4: if the fact that something is both not a 24/7 and a shoot-down is incorrect it is not a kind of a hatchel. sent5: the meitnerium is a shoot-down. sent6: that something is both not avionic and not a 24/7 is incorrect if it is a shoot-down. sent7: the Voltaren is defervescent and/or it is a dotage. sent8: the Voltaren is a Phasianus or is not Ethiopian or both. sent9: if the fact that something is defervescent and/or it is not a kind of a hatchel is not true then it is a toxemia. sent10: something is a toxemia if the fact that it is defervescent or is not a kind of an egg or both is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the Voltaren is a toxemia and it is a kind of a hatchel is incorrect it is not a kind of a toxemia. sent12: the fact that the meitnerium is not a 24/7 and is a shoot-down is wrong if the folder is not avionic. sent13: if something is a 24/7 then it is not a hatchel and is not a kind of a toxemia. sent14: that something is either defervescent or not an egg or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a hatchel. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the Voltaren is a toxemia if that it is defervescent and/or not an egg is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Voltaren is defervescent and/or is not an egg is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Voltaren is a kind of a toxemia.; sent11 & sent3 -> int3: the Voltaren is not a toxemia.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__