the myrmecophyte is a kind of a knawel.
sent1: the hydroxyproline fragments. sent2: if something is a network the fact that it is not a knawel is true. sent3: if the myrmecophyte is a network then it is not a kind of a knawel. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not a network and is not nonsyllabic is incorrect the cottonwood is anisogametic. sent5: that the bran is not a network and not nonsyllabic is false if it is not a fragment. sent6: the caprifig is anaesthetic if it does remodel serictery. sent7: if the cartilage is not anisogametic that the myrmecophyte does network and is anisogametic is incorrect. sent8: the caprifig is a fragment. sent9: the cottonwood is anaesthetic or fragments or both. sent10: the cottonwood is not anisogametic if the myrmecophyte is not anaesthetic. sent11: the cottonwood is not anaesthetic and/or it is a fragment. sent12: the bran is not a fragment. sent13: if the caprifig does not remodel serictery the cartilage is not anisogametic. sent14: the fact that that the myrmecophyte is a network and it is anisogametic is correct does not hold. sent15: if there is something such that it is anisogametic the cartilage is anaesthetic thing that does remodel serictery. sent16: if the cartilage is non-anisogametic that the myrmecophyte is not a network but it is non-anisogametic does not hold. sent17: the fact that if the fact that the myrmecophyte is not anaesthetic hold then that the cottonwood is not a network but it is anaesthetic is not correct is not incorrect. sent18: if the fact that something does not network and is anisogametic does not hold then it is not a knawel. sent19: if the myrmecophyte is a network then it fragments. sent20: if either the cottonwood is not anaesthetic or it fragments or both then the caprifig is not anaesthetic. sent21: the caprifig does not network.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the caprifig does remodel serictery is not wrong.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the caprifig is anaesthetic.; sent20 & sent11 -> int2: that the caprifig is not anaesthetic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the caprifig does not remodel serictery is true.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the cartilage is not anisogametic.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: that the myrmecophyte does not network and is anisogametic is incorrect.; sent18 -> int7: the myrmecophyte is not a knawel if that it is both not a network and anisogametic is not right.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the myrmecophyte is a knawel.
sent5 & sent12 -> int8: that the bran is not a network and not nonsyllabic is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it does not network and is not nonsyllabic is wrong.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: that the cottonwood is anisogametic is not false.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is anisogametic.; int11 & sent15 -> int12: the fact that the cartilage is not non-anaesthetic and does remodel serictery hold.; int12 -> int13: the cartilage is anaesthetic.; int13 -> int14: there are anaesthetic things.;
$hypothesis$ = the myrmecophyte is a kind of a knawel. ; $context$ = sent1: the hydroxyproline fragments. sent2: if something is a network the fact that it is not a knawel is true. sent3: if the myrmecophyte is a network then it is not a kind of a knawel. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not a network and is not nonsyllabic is incorrect the cottonwood is anisogametic. sent5: that the bran is not a network and not nonsyllabic is false if it is not a fragment. sent6: the caprifig is anaesthetic if it does remodel serictery. sent7: if the cartilage is not anisogametic that the myrmecophyte does network and is anisogametic is incorrect. sent8: the caprifig is a fragment. sent9: the cottonwood is anaesthetic or fragments or both. sent10: the cottonwood is not anisogametic if the myrmecophyte is not anaesthetic. sent11: the cottonwood is not anaesthetic and/or it is a fragment. sent12: the bran is not a fragment. sent13: if the caprifig does not remodel serictery the cartilage is not anisogametic. sent14: the fact that that the myrmecophyte is a network and it is anisogametic is correct does not hold. sent15: if there is something such that it is anisogametic the cartilage is anaesthetic thing that does remodel serictery. sent16: if the cartilage is non-anisogametic that the myrmecophyte is not a network but it is non-anisogametic does not hold. sent17: the fact that if the fact that the myrmecophyte is not anaesthetic hold then that the cottonwood is not a network but it is anaesthetic is not correct is not incorrect. sent18: if the fact that something does not network and is anisogametic does not hold then it is not a knawel. sent19: if the myrmecophyte is a network then it fragments. sent20: if either the cottonwood is not anaesthetic or it fragments or both then the caprifig is not anaesthetic. sent21: the caprifig does not network. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the caprifig does remodel serictery is not wrong.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the caprifig is anaesthetic.; sent20 & sent11 -> int2: that the caprifig is not anaesthetic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the caprifig does not remodel serictery is true.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the cartilage is not anisogametic.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: that the myrmecophyte does not network and is anisogametic is incorrect.; sent18 -> int7: the myrmecophyte is not a knawel if that it is both not a network and anisogametic is not right.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__