something is not muciferous but it does fill shimmy.
sent1: the woodcarver does not accredit editor and does not accredit Anabantidae. sent2: something does not accredit Anabantidae but it is ciliary if it is not a kind of a compliment. sent3: if that the nut fills shimmy is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a compliment and it is a Onsager. sent4: something does not accredit Anabantidae and is a compliment. sent5: the nut is not a compliment. sent6: the nut does not compliment and it does not accredit Anabantidae. sent7: everything does not accredit Anabantidae. sent8: the fact that the nut is muciferous if that the woodcarver is not a compliment and does not accredit Anabantidae hold hold. sent9: if the nut does not accredit Anabantidae and is not a Onsager then the woodcarver compliments. sent10: the woodcarver is not muciferous if it does compliment. sent11: if the nut does accredit Anabantidae and is not a Onsager the woodcarver does compliment. sent12: the woodcarver is a kind of a earwig. sent13: if the woodcarver is a compliment then it is not muciferous and it fills shimmy. sent14: the nut does not accredit Anabantidae. sent15: that if the woodcarver is a kind of the earwig then that the woodcarver is not muciferous but it is Pythagorean is not false is correct. sent16: something is not muciferous. sent17: the woodcarver is not a Onsager. sent18: there is something such that it fills shimmy. sent19: everything does not accredit Anabantidae and is not a kind of a Onsager. sent20: something is muciferous and it does fill shimmy.
sent19 -> int1: the nut does not accredit Anabantidae and is not a Onsager.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the woodcarver does compliment.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the woodcarver is not muciferous but it fills shimmy.; int3 -> hypothesis;
that the shimmy does not accredit Anabantidae and is ciliary is not false.
sent2 -> int4: if the shimmy is not a compliment it does not accredit Anabantidae and it is ciliary.; sent15 & sent12 -> int5: the woodcarver is a kind of non-muciferous thing that is Pythagorean.; int5 -> int6: that the woodcarver is not muciferous is not wrong.; int6 -> int7: there are non-muciferous things.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not muciferous but it does fill shimmy. ; $context$ = sent1: the woodcarver does not accredit editor and does not accredit Anabantidae. sent2: something does not accredit Anabantidae but it is ciliary if it is not a kind of a compliment. sent3: if that the nut fills shimmy is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a compliment and it is a Onsager. sent4: something does not accredit Anabantidae and is a compliment. sent5: the nut is not a compliment. sent6: the nut does not compliment and it does not accredit Anabantidae. sent7: everything does not accredit Anabantidae. sent8: the fact that the nut is muciferous if that the woodcarver is not a compliment and does not accredit Anabantidae hold hold. sent9: if the nut does not accredit Anabantidae and is not a Onsager then the woodcarver compliments. sent10: the woodcarver is not muciferous if it does compliment. sent11: if the nut does accredit Anabantidae and is not a Onsager the woodcarver does compliment. sent12: the woodcarver is a kind of a earwig. sent13: if the woodcarver is a compliment then it is not muciferous and it fills shimmy. sent14: the nut does not accredit Anabantidae. sent15: that if the woodcarver is a kind of the earwig then that the woodcarver is not muciferous but it is Pythagorean is not false is correct. sent16: something is not muciferous. sent17: the woodcarver is not a Onsager. sent18: there is something such that it fills shimmy. sent19: everything does not accredit Anabantidae and is not a kind of a Onsager. sent20: something is muciferous and it does fill shimmy. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the nut does not accredit Anabantidae and is not a Onsager.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the woodcarver does compliment.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the woodcarver is not muciferous but it fills shimmy.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__