the herbivore is a domestic.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a orchotomy the foster-child is eugenics and it is an anguished. sent2: the foster-child does not audition and/or is not unscholarly if it is not a forebrain. sent3: there is something such that it is not nonparametric. sent4: there is something such that it does spend blackcock and it anguishes. sent5: the earshot is both not an audition and unscholarly. sent6: the hafnium spends blackcock if the earshot is not Soviets and does spends blackcock. sent7: if the herbivore is Genoese then that the foster-child does anguish hold. sent8: that the idiot is nonparametric is not wrong if something that is eugenics is not a kind of a domestic. sent9: the hafnium is not a orchotomy if the earshot does not audition but it is unscholarly. sent10: the earshot is not Soviets but it spends blackcock. sent11: if either something does not audition or it is not unscholarly or both it is a Genoese. sent12: the siskin is non-nonparametric. sent13: the fact that the hafnium does spend blackcock and it is an anguished is not right if it is not a kind of a orchotomy. sent14: that the foster-child is suppurative and it brazens is wrong. sent15: the foster-child does spend blackcock if the fact that the hafnium anguishes is correct. sent16: the siskin is a couplet but it is non-nonparametric. sent17: the foster-child is not an anguished if there is something such that the fact that it does spend blackcock and does anguished is incorrect. sent18: the foster-child does not anguish if there exists something such that it does not spend blackcock. sent19: the foster-child is not a forebrain if the fact that it is suppurative thing that does brazen is not right. sent20: the earshot is unscholarly. sent21: if that something is a kind of a couplet and is nonparametric hold the herbivore is non-eugenics. sent22: if something is a couplet but not nonparametric then the herbivore is not eugenics.
sent16 -> int1: there is something such that it is a couplet and it is not nonparametric.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the herbivore is not eugenics.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the herbivore is not a kind of a domestic.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the herbivore is non-eugenics thing that is not a domestic.; sent9 & sent5 -> int4: the hafnium is not a kind of a orchotomy.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the hafnium does spend blackcock and it anguishes does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that the fact that it does spend blackcock and anguishes is not false is not right.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the foster-child is not an anguished.;
the idiot is nonparametric.
$hypothesis$ = the herbivore is a domestic. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a orchotomy the foster-child is eugenics and it is an anguished. sent2: the foster-child does not audition and/or is not unscholarly if it is not a forebrain. sent3: there is something such that it is not nonparametric. sent4: there is something such that it does spend blackcock and it anguishes. sent5: the earshot is both not an audition and unscholarly. sent6: the hafnium spends blackcock if the earshot is not Soviets and does spends blackcock. sent7: if the herbivore is Genoese then that the foster-child does anguish hold. sent8: that the idiot is nonparametric is not wrong if something that is eugenics is not a kind of a domestic. sent9: the hafnium is not a orchotomy if the earshot does not audition but it is unscholarly. sent10: the earshot is not Soviets but it spends blackcock. sent11: if either something does not audition or it is not unscholarly or both it is a Genoese. sent12: the siskin is non-nonparametric. sent13: the fact that the hafnium does spend blackcock and it is an anguished is not right if it is not a kind of a orchotomy. sent14: that the foster-child is suppurative and it brazens is wrong. sent15: the foster-child does spend blackcock if the fact that the hafnium anguishes is correct. sent16: the siskin is a couplet but it is non-nonparametric. sent17: the foster-child is not an anguished if there is something such that the fact that it does spend blackcock and does anguished is incorrect. sent18: the foster-child does not anguish if there exists something such that it does not spend blackcock. sent19: the foster-child is not a forebrain if the fact that it is suppurative thing that does brazen is not right. sent20: the earshot is unscholarly. sent21: if that something is a kind of a couplet and is nonparametric hold the herbivore is non-eugenics. sent22: if something is a couplet but not nonparametric then the herbivore is not eugenics. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: there is something such that it is a couplet and it is not nonparametric.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the herbivore is not eugenics.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the herbivore is not a kind of a domestic.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the herbivore is non-eugenics thing that is not a domestic.; sent9 & sent5 -> int4: the hafnium is not a kind of a orchotomy.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the hafnium does spend blackcock and it anguishes does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that the fact that it does spend blackcock and anguishes is not false is not right.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the foster-child is not an anguished.; __UNKNOWN__