either the obliterator is not an arum or it does not camber or both if the pamphleteer is not a kind of a desktop.
sent1: if the solitude is not a moke then the pamphleteer does crouch and it does firebomb pademelon. sent2: if the fact that the pamphleteer does not crouch is not incorrect the testcross is not an arum or is a desktop or both. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a desktop and/or it is not herbivorous is incorrect then it is not a kind of a moke. sent4: the obliterator is not a kind of an arum and/or it is not a kind of a camber if the testcross is not a kind of an arum. sent5: if the pamphleteer is herbivorous then that it is a desktop is not false. sent6: if the obliterator is an arum then the pamphleteer is not a kind of a camber and/or it does not firebomb pademelon. sent7: the testcross is not an arum if the obliterator is not a crouch but it does firebomb pademelon. sent8: if the obliterator does firebomb pademelon it is an arum. sent9: the solitude is herbivorous. sent10: the solitude is not a moke.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pamphleteer is herbivorous.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the pamphleteer is a desktop.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pamphleteer is not a kind of a desktop.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pamphleteer is not herbivorous.; sent1 & sent10 -> int4: the pamphleteer is a kind of a crouch that firebombs pademelon.; int4 -> int5: the pamphleteer does crouch.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the pamphleteer is not herbivorous but it crouches.;
that the insulation is not a kind of a moke is not incorrect.
sent3 -> int7: if that the insulation is either not a desktop or not herbivorous or both is wrong it is not a moke.;
$hypothesis$ = either the obliterator is not an arum or it does not camber or both if the pamphleteer is not a kind of a desktop. ; $context$ = sent1: if the solitude is not a moke then the pamphleteer does crouch and it does firebomb pademelon. sent2: if the fact that the pamphleteer does not crouch is not incorrect the testcross is not an arum or is a desktop or both. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a desktop and/or it is not herbivorous is incorrect then it is not a kind of a moke. sent4: the obliterator is not a kind of an arum and/or it is not a kind of a camber if the testcross is not a kind of an arum. sent5: if the pamphleteer is herbivorous then that it is a desktop is not false. sent6: if the obliterator is an arum then the pamphleteer is not a kind of a camber and/or it does not firebomb pademelon. sent7: the testcross is not an arum if the obliterator is not a crouch but it does firebomb pademelon. sent8: if the obliterator does firebomb pademelon it is an arum. sent9: the solitude is herbivorous. sent10: the solitude is not a moke. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pamphleteer is herbivorous.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the pamphleteer is a desktop.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pamphleteer is not a kind of a desktop.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pamphleteer is not herbivorous.; sent1 & sent10 -> int4: the pamphleteer is a kind of a crouch that firebombs pademelon.; int4 -> int5: the pamphleteer does crouch.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the pamphleteer is not herbivorous but it crouches.; __UNKNOWN__