the transponder does finger giantess.
sent1: the transponder is not a Norn but it does laicize blocker if the fact that it is not a NSC is wrong. sent2: if something that is not a Norn does laicize blocker it does not finger giantess. sent3: if the bible laicizes blocker and is Markovian then it does not laicize Quiscalus. sent4: if something is not Coleridgian it does finger giantess and is a NSC. sent5: the transponder is a kind of a NSC. sent6: something is not Coleridgian if the fact that it does finger harbor and is a ponderousness is not correct. sent7: if something is a Shoshone then it does not finger Eris and is not non-experiential.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the transponder does not finger giantess hold if it is not a Norn and laicizes blocker.; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: the transponder is not a Norn and does laicize blocker.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
if the dewlap is a Shoshone it does not finger Eris and is experiential.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the transponder does finger giantess. ; $context$ = sent1: the transponder is not a Norn but it does laicize blocker if the fact that it is not a NSC is wrong. sent2: if something that is not a Norn does laicize blocker it does not finger giantess. sent3: if the bible laicizes blocker and is Markovian then it does not laicize Quiscalus. sent4: if something is not Coleridgian it does finger giantess and is a NSC. sent5: the transponder is a kind of a NSC. sent6: something is not Coleridgian if the fact that it does finger harbor and is a ponderousness is not correct. sent7: if something is a Shoshone then it does not finger Eris and is not non-experiential. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the transponder does not finger giantess hold if it is not a Norn and laicizes blocker.; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: the transponder is not a Norn and does laicize blocker.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__