that there exists something such that if it does not amplify forebrain that it is not juiceless hold is correct.
sent1: if the fact that the langoustine does not amplify forebrain is not false it is not juiceless. sent2: the langoustine is juiceless if it does not amplify forebrain. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not spoil mapping then it is not a phaius. sent4: there is something such that if it amplifies forebrain then it is not juiceless. sent5: there is something such that if it is not midi it is epigastric. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not an inflection then it spoils langoustine. sent7: if the langoustine amplifies forebrain it is not juiceless. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a diviner it is not a schizoid.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not amplify forebrain that it is not juiceless hold is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the langoustine does not amplify forebrain is not false it is not juiceless. sent2: the langoustine is juiceless if it does not amplify forebrain. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not spoil mapping then it is not a phaius. sent4: there is something such that if it amplifies forebrain then it is not juiceless. sent5: there is something such that if it is not midi it is epigastric. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not an inflection then it spoils langoustine. sent7: if the langoustine amplifies forebrain it is not juiceless. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a diviner it is not a schizoid. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__