that the atheisticness does not occur and the catalyzing financier does not occur is triggered by the radioactiveness.
sent1: that not the acetonicness but the analogue happens is not true if that the slicing holophyte does not occur is right. sent2: the frittering does not occur and the instrumenting gravimeter does not occur. sent3: that the radioactiveness does not occur is prevented by that the slicing holophyte and the atheisticness happens. sent4: the slicing CBC happens. sent5: if the slicing holophyte occurs and the atheisticness happens then the radioactiveness does not occur. sent6: if that both the non-acetonicness and the analogue happens is not right the analogue does not occur. sent7: the acetonicness occurs. sent8: that the freshet does not occur is not false. sent9: that the Set does not occur and the diabetic does not occur is caused by the confection. sent10: the catalyzing financier does not occur. sent11: that the non-atheisticness and the nonradioactiveness happens is wrong if the catalyzing financier happens. sent12: the acetonicness and the slicing holophyte happens. sent13: that that the therapeuticness does not occur is not false if the propagativeness happens and the lash happens is not incorrect.
sent12 -> int1: the slicing holophyte occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the atheisticness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the slicing holophyte and the atheisticness occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the radioactiveness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the radioactiveness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the atheisticness does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the atheisticness does not occur and the catalyzing financier does not occur is not wrong.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the analogue does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the atheisticness does not occur and the catalyzing financier does not occur is triggered by the radioactiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the acetonicness but the analogue happens is not true if that the slicing holophyte does not occur is right. sent2: the frittering does not occur and the instrumenting gravimeter does not occur. sent3: that the radioactiveness does not occur is prevented by that the slicing holophyte and the atheisticness happens. sent4: the slicing CBC happens. sent5: if the slicing holophyte occurs and the atheisticness happens then the radioactiveness does not occur. sent6: if that both the non-acetonicness and the analogue happens is not right the analogue does not occur. sent7: the acetonicness occurs. sent8: that the freshet does not occur is not false. sent9: that the Set does not occur and the diabetic does not occur is caused by the confection. sent10: the catalyzing financier does not occur. sent11: that the non-atheisticness and the nonradioactiveness happens is wrong if the catalyzing financier happens. sent12: the acetonicness and the slicing holophyte happens. sent13: that that the therapeuticness does not occur is not false if the propagativeness happens and the lash happens is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the slicing holophyte occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the atheisticness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the slicing holophyte and the atheisticness occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the radioactiveness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the radioactiveness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the atheisticness does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the atheisticness does not occur and the catalyzing financier does not occur is not wrong.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__