the fraying occurs and/or the reciprocating tabulation happens.
sent1: that the non-excitableness and the bronchoscopicness occurs is not true. sent2: both the dogfighting and the intrapulmonariness occurs if the reciprocating gaudy does not occur. sent3: the fraying does not occur if that the fraying and the caroling occurs is not correct. sent4: the migratoriness happens. sent5: the extroversiveness does not occur if that not the excitableness but the bronchoscopicness happens is not correct. sent6: if the barometricness does not occur the fact that the fraying and the caroling happens is false. sent7: that both the reciprocating gaudy and the reciprocating tabulation happens is caused by that the extroversiveness does not occur. sent8: that the fraying occurs or the reciprocating tabulation occurs or both is not right if the reciprocating gaudy does not occur.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the extroversiveness does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the reciprocating gaudy and the reciprocating tabulation occurs.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the reciprocating tabulation occurs is correct.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fraying happens and/or the reciprocating tabulation occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = the fraying occurs and/or the reciprocating tabulation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the non-excitableness and the bronchoscopicness occurs is not true. sent2: both the dogfighting and the intrapulmonariness occurs if the reciprocating gaudy does not occur. sent3: the fraying does not occur if that the fraying and the caroling occurs is not correct. sent4: the migratoriness happens. sent5: the extroversiveness does not occur if that not the excitableness but the bronchoscopicness happens is not correct. sent6: if the barometricness does not occur the fact that the fraying and the caroling happens is false. sent7: that both the reciprocating gaudy and the reciprocating tabulation happens is caused by that the extroversiveness does not occur. sent8: that the fraying occurs or the reciprocating tabulation occurs or both is not right if the reciprocating gaudy does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the extroversiveness does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the reciprocating gaudy and the reciprocating tabulation occurs.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the reciprocating tabulation occurs is correct.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__