not the Markovianness but the jarring plaque happens.
sent1: that the planning does not occur and the leanness does not occur is not right if the commenting occurs. sent2: that the commenting happens is not incorrect. sent3: that the generationalness happens leads to the jarring plaque. sent4: the Markovianness does not occur if that the planning does not occur and the leanness does not occur is not true. sent5: that the jigging but not the emending pop-fly occurs does not hold if the tiring ampere-hour occurs. sent6: that the reconciliation does not occur and the urticating vice does not occur does not hold. sent7: the generationalness and the Jesuiticalness happens.
sent7 -> int1: the generationalness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the jarring plaque happens.; sent1 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the planning does not occur and the leanness does not occur is false.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the Markovianness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = not the Markovianness but the jarring plaque happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the planning does not occur and the leanness does not occur is not right if the commenting occurs. sent2: that the commenting happens is not incorrect. sent3: that the generationalness happens leads to the jarring plaque. sent4: the Markovianness does not occur if that the planning does not occur and the leanness does not occur is not true. sent5: that the jigging but not the emending pop-fly occurs does not hold if the tiring ampere-hour occurs. sent6: that the reconciliation does not occur and the urticating vice does not occur does not hold. sent7: the generationalness and the Jesuiticalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the generationalness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the jarring plaque happens.; sent1 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the planning does not occur and the leanness does not occur is false.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the Markovianness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__