the fact that the telethermometer is a dropping and it is a Orlando does not hold.
sent1: that everything does not gear sheepherder is right. sent2: if the alexandrite does not gear psalterium the fact that the bodywork is not minors but it is diffused is not right. sent3: the bodywork is a highbinder. sent4: if the snowboarder is an alphabetization then it does not gear sheepherder. sent5: if the hack is not a optative then the fact that it is gymnastics thing that is not resistible is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the bodywork is a Orlando that gears psalterium is false the alexandrite is not a Orlando. sent7: if the snowboarder is a kind of an alphabetization it is not a highbinder and it does not gear sheepherder. sent8: that the telethermometer is a Orlando is not incorrect if the fact that the hack is gymnastics is not correct. sent9: the fact that if the snowboarder is not a highbinder and it does not gear sheepherder then the hack is not a optative is right. sent10: the fact that the snowboarder is both a highbinder and not a optative does not hold. sent11: that the fact that the bodywork is a Orlando and does gear psalterium is true is wrong if the snowboarder is not an alphabetization. sent12: if that that the hack is not non-gymnastics and not resistible hold is not correct the telethermometer is a Orlando. sent13: the telethermometer does camber numeracy. sent14: the alexandrite does not gear psalterium. sent15: the bodywork is an alphabetization if the fact that the fact that the telethermometer diffuses and is not a kind of a dropping does not hold is not false. sent16: that the bodywork is not minors and it does not diffuse is incorrect if the alexandrite does not gear psalterium. sent17: the snowboarder is not a Orlando and it does not camber numeracy if it gears sheepherder. sent18: the telethermometer is a dropping and does camber numeracy. sent19: The psalterium does not gear alexandrite. sent20: that the bodywork is not minors but diffused is false. sent21: the snowboarder is a kind of an alphabetization if the bodywork is diffused. sent22: the sheepherder gears alexandrite. sent23: something does gear psalterium if it is an alphabetization. sent24: the hack is non-optative if the snowboarder is not a highbinder but it gears sheepherder. sent25: the snowboarder is a kind of an alphabetization if that the bodywork is not minors and not diffused is not right. sent26: the bodywork drops if that the telethermometer is diffused but it does not gear sheepherder is not true. sent27: the snowboarder does not gear sheepherder.
sent16 & sent14 -> int1: that the bodywork is not minors and it is non-diffused is not correct.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the snowboarder is an alphabetization.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the snowboarder is not a kind of a highbinder and it does not gear sheepherder.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the hack is not optative.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the hack is gymnastics but it is not resistible does not hold.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the telethermometer is a Orlando.; sent18 -> int7: the telethermometer is a dropping.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the telethermometer is a dropping that is a Orlando is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the telethermometer is a dropping and it is a Orlando does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that everything does not gear sheepherder is right. sent2: if the alexandrite does not gear psalterium the fact that the bodywork is not minors but it is diffused is not right. sent3: the bodywork is a highbinder. sent4: if the snowboarder is an alphabetization then it does not gear sheepherder. sent5: if the hack is not a optative then the fact that it is gymnastics thing that is not resistible is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the bodywork is a Orlando that gears psalterium is false the alexandrite is not a Orlando. sent7: if the snowboarder is a kind of an alphabetization it is not a highbinder and it does not gear sheepherder. sent8: that the telethermometer is a Orlando is not incorrect if the fact that the hack is gymnastics is not correct. sent9: the fact that if the snowboarder is not a highbinder and it does not gear sheepherder then the hack is not a optative is right. sent10: the fact that the snowboarder is both a highbinder and not a optative does not hold. sent11: that the fact that the bodywork is a Orlando and does gear psalterium is true is wrong if the snowboarder is not an alphabetization. sent12: if that that the hack is not non-gymnastics and not resistible hold is not correct the telethermometer is a Orlando. sent13: the telethermometer does camber numeracy. sent14: the alexandrite does not gear psalterium. sent15: the bodywork is an alphabetization if the fact that the fact that the telethermometer diffuses and is not a kind of a dropping does not hold is not false. sent16: that the bodywork is not minors and it does not diffuse is incorrect if the alexandrite does not gear psalterium. sent17: the snowboarder is not a Orlando and it does not camber numeracy if it gears sheepherder. sent18: the telethermometer is a dropping and does camber numeracy. sent19: The psalterium does not gear alexandrite. sent20: that the bodywork is not minors but diffused is false. sent21: the snowboarder is a kind of an alphabetization if the bodywork is diffused. sent22: the sheepherder gears alexandrite. sent23: something does gear psalterium if it is an alphabetization. sent24: the hack is non-optative if the snowboarder is not a highbinder but it gears sheepherder. sent25: the snowboarder is a kind of an alphabetization if that the bodywork is not minors and not diffused is not right. sent26: the bodywork drops if that the telethermometer is diffused but it does not gear sheepherder is not true. sent27: the snowboarder does not gear sheepherder. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent14 -> int1: that the bodywork is not minors and it is non-diffused is not correct.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the snowboarder is an alphabetization.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the snowboarder is not a kind of a highbinder and it does not gear sheepherder.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the hack is not optative.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the hack is gymnastics but it is not resistible does not hold.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the telethermometer is a Orlando.; sent18 -> int7: the telethermometer is a dropping.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__