that the butterscotch is a kind of a sampan and does furrow syndic is false.
sent1: the sodom is indoor and/or a cashier. sent2: the butterscotch does furrow syndic. sent3: if the sodom is a cashier then the mannequin does bleep. sent4: the mannequin does not proposition needlepoint. sent5: if the mannequin is toeless the bookshelf is topless. sent6: The needlepoint does not proposition mannequin. sent7: the mannequin is toeless if it does bleep and it does not proposition needlepoint. sent8: if the fact that the sodom is indoor is not wrong then the mannequin does bleep. sent9: if that the bookshelf is topless is not incorrect then it reassails bookshelf. sent10: the gold reassails bookshelf. sent11: The syndic does furrow butterscotch. sent12: if the bookshelf does reassail bookshelf then the butterscotch is a kind of a sampan.
sent1 & sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the mannequin bleeps.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the mannequin does bleep but it does not proposition needlepoint.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the mannequin is toeless.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the bookshelf is topless.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the bookshelf reassails bookshelf.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the butterscotch is a sampan.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the butterscotch is a kind of a sampan and does furrow syndic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the sodom is indoor and/or a cashier. sent2: the butterscotch does furrow syndic. sent3: if the sodom is a cashier then the mannequin does bleep. sent4: the mannequin does not proposition needlepoint. sent5: if the mannequin is toeless the bookshelf is topless. sent6: The needlepoint does not proposition mannequin. sent7: the mannequin is toeless if it does bleep and it does not proposition needlepoint. sent8: if the fact that the sodom is indoor is not wrong then the mannequin does bleep. sent9: if that the bookshelf is topless is not incorrect then it reassails bookshelf. sent10: the gold reassails bookshelf. sent11: The syndic does furrow butterscotch. sent12: if the bookshelf does reassail bookshelf then the butterscotch is a kind of a sampan. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the mannequin bleeps.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the mannequin does bleep but it does not proposition needlepoint.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the mannequin is toeless.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the bookshelf is topless.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the bookshelf reassails bookshelf.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the butterscotch is a sampan.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__