there exists something such that if it does not space SOD the fact that it does not interpret flitch and is a GIGO is false.
sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it does space SOD that it does not interpret flitch and is a GIGO is false hold. sent2: the Pole does not interpret flitch but it is a GIGO if that it does not space SOD hold. sent3: there is something such that if it does not space SOD then it does not interpret flitch and it is a GIGO. sent4: something does not interpret flitch but it is a kind of a GIGO if it does not space SOD. sent5: there is something such that if it does not space SOD that it interprets flitch and it is a GIGO is incorrect. sent6: that something interprets flitch and it is a GIGO is false if it does not space SOD. sent7: if something is not a classics then the fact that it does not interpret antidepressant and it does space SOD is not correct. sent8: the fact that the Pole does not interpret flitch and is a GIGO is not right if it does space SOD. sent9: the fact that something does not interpret flitch but it is a GIGO does not hold if it does not space SOD. sent10: that something is uncharacteristic thing that is a kind of a reach is incorrect if it does not decouple. sent11: that something does not interpret flitch but it is a kind of a GIGO is not right if the fact that it does space SOD is not wrong.
sent9 -> int1: if the Pole does not space SOD the fact that it does not interpret flitch and is a GIGO does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the waffle does not interpret antidepressant and spaces SOD is false if the fact that it is not a kind of a classics is correct.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not space SOD the fact that it does not interpret flitch and is a GIGO is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it does space SOD that it does not interpret flitch and is a GIGO is false hold. sent2: the Pole does not interpret flitch but it is a GIGO if that it does not space SOD hold. sent3: there is something such that if it does not space SOD then it does not interpret flitch and it is a GIGO. sent4: something does not interpret flitch but it is a kind of a GIGO if it does not space SOD. sent5: there is something such that if it does not space SOD that it interprets flitch and it is a GIGO is incorrect. sent6: that something interprets flitch and it is a GIGO is false if it does not space SOD. sent7: if something is not a classics then the fact that it does not interpret antidepressant and it does space SOD is not correct. sent8: the fact that the Pole does not interpret flitch and is a GIGO is not right if it does space SOD. sent9: the fact that something does not interpret flitch but it is a GIGO does not hold if it does not space SOD. sent10: that something is uncharacteristic thing that is a kind of a reach is incorrect if it does not decouple. sent11: that something does not interpret flitch but it is a kind of a GIGO is not right if the fact that it does space SOD is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the Pole does not space SOD the fact that it does not interpret flitch and is a GIGO does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__