not the deletion but the incision occurs if the carnalness happens.
sent1: the gladness happens. sent2: the subsidization and/or the sheltering young occurs if the snatching does not occur. sent3: either the erythropoieticness or the raising or both happens if the convolution does not occur. sent4: the slicing happens. sent5: the dismissal does not occur. sent6: that the scoffing does not occur and the pugilisticness happens is triggered by that the exportableness happens. sent7: if the sheltering obscenity happens then the distinguishing obscenity occurs. sent8: that the subsidization happens brings about that the aluminousness occurs. sent9: if the wiring tabard occurs the wiring pastime happens. sent10: if the carnalness does not occur the wiring pastime does not occur. sent11: the liveness and the wiring Taoist occurs. sent12: the non-lobeliaceousness and the allness happens. sent13: the wiring tabard occurs. sent14: both the non-ammoniticness and the orthodoxness occurs. sent15: the fact that the palpebrateness does not occur hold. sent16: if the sheltering young occurs then the aluminousness happens. sent17: if the raising happens not the placableness but the failure occurs. sent18: the dissilience does not occur. sent19: the snatch does not occur. sent20: that if the clang happens the fact that the Mesoamericanness does not occur does not hold is not wrong. sent21: if the fact that the filling happens is right then the restarting occurs. sent22: the angioplasty brings about that the drunkenness occurs. sent23: the incision occurs if the aluminousness happens. sent24: the philosophicness happens or the apocryphalness occurs or both. sent25: that the wiring pastime and the carnalness happens yields that the deletion does not occur. sent26: the vegetalness occurs.
sent9 & sent13 -> int1: the wiring pastime occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carnalness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the wiring pastime and the carnalness happens.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the deletion does not occur.; sent2 & sent19 -> int4: the subsidization and/or the sheltering young happens.; int4 & sent8 & sent16 -> int5: the aluminousness occurs.; sent23 & int5 -> int6: the incision occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: not the deletion but the incision occurs.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the calyptrateness happens.
$hypothesis$ = not the deletion but the incision occurs if the carnalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the gladness happens. sent2: the subsidization and/or the sheltering young occurs if the snatching does not occur. sent3: either the erythropoieticness or the raising or both happens if the convolution does not occur. sent4: the slicing happens. sent5: the dismissal does not occur. sent6: that the scoffing does not occur and the pugilisticness happens is triggered by that the exportableness happens. sent7: if the sheltering obscenity happens then the distinguishing obscenity occurs. sent8: that the subsidization happens brings about that the aluminousness occurs. sent9: if the wiring tabard occurs the wiring pastime happens. sent10: if the carnalness does not occur the wiring pastime does not occur. sent11: the liveness and the wiring Taoist occurs. sent12: the non-lobeliaceousness and the allness happens. sent13: the wiring tabard occurs. sent14: both the non-ammoniticness and the orthodoxness occurs. sent15: the fact that the palpebrateness does not occur hold. sent16: if the sheltering young occurs then the aluminousness happens. sent17: if the raising happens not the placableness but the failure occurs. sent18: the dissilience does not occur. sent19: the snatch does not occur. sent20: that if the clang happens the fact that the Mesoamericanness does not occur does not hold is not wrong. sent21: if the fact that the filling happens is right then the restarting occurs. sent22: the angioplasty brings about that the drunkenness occurs. sent23: the incision occurs if the aluminousness happens. sent24: the philosophicness happens or the apocryphalness occurs or both. sent25: that the wiring pastime and the carnalness happens yields that the deletion does not occur. sent26: the vegetalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent13 -> int1: the wiring pastime occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carnalness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the wiring pastime and the carnalness happens.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the deletion does not occur.; sent2 & sent19 -> int4: the subsidization and/or the sheltering young happens.; int4 & sent8 & sent16 -> int5: the aluminousness occurs.; sent23 & int5 -> int6: the incision occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: not the deletion but the incision occurs.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__