the undiplomaticness does not occur.
sent1: if the dressage happens then that the fact that the perviousness does not occur but the undiplomaticness happens is not wrong is false. sent2: if that the particularisticness does not occur is right the reconnaissance does not occur. sent3: the fact that the whistling Saskatchewan does not occur but the wading occurs does not hold if the precentorship does not occur. sent4: if the smiting Platonism does not occur then the dressage does not occur and the whistling Caldwell does not occur. sent5: the precentorship does not occur and the Ghanaianness happens. sent6: the spicateness does not occur. sent7: either that the dressage does not occur or the perviousness or both prevents that the undiplomaticness does not occur. sent8: not the spiccato but the unzipping occurs. sent9: that the particularisticness does not occur and the gothicness does not occur is triggered by the curliness. sent10: if that not the whistling Saskatchewan but the wading happens is false then the defalcation does not occur. sent11: the smiting Platonism does not occur and the substantiating does not occur if the dreaming thriftlessness occurs. sent12: the dressage happens. sent13: if the reconnaissance does not occur then not the rotatoriness but the dreaming thriftlessness happens. sent14: the fact that the umbelliferousness does not occur and the zoolatry occurs is wrong. sent15: that the stratification happens and/or the mastering is triggered by that the defalcation does not occur. sent16: the non-curliness is prevented by that the stratification happens. sent17: that the whistling Caldwell does not occur brings about that the dressage does not occur and/or that the perviousness occurs. sent18: that the non-undiplomaticness and the non-perviousness happens prevents that the coconspiring does not occur. sent19: that the dreaming thriftlessness does not occur causes that the smiting Platonism and the substantiating occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undiplomaticness happens.; sent1 & sent12 -> int1: the fact that the non-perviousness and the undiplomaticness occurs does not hold.;
the undiplomaticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the undiplomaticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dressage happens then that the fact that the perviousness does not occur but the undiplomaticness happens is not wrong is false. sent2: if that the particularisticness does not occur is right the reconnaissance does not occur. sent3: the fact that the whistling Saskatchewan does not occur but the wading occurs does not hold if the precentorship does not occur. sent4: if the smiting Platonism does not occur then the dressage does not occur and the whistling Caldwell does not occur. sent5: the precentorship does not occur and the Ghanaianness happens. sent6: the spicateness does not occur. sent7: either that the dressage does not occur or the perviousness or both prevents that the undiplomaticness does not occur. sent8: not the spiccato but the unzipping occurs. sent9: that the particularisticness does not occur and the gothicness does not occur is triggered by the curliness. sent10: if that not the whistling Saskatchewan but the wading happens is false then the defalcation does not occur. sent11: the smiting Platonism does not occur and the substantiating does not occur if the dreaming thriftlessness occurs. sent12: the dressage happens. sent13: if the reconnaissance does not occur then not the rotatoriness but the dreaming thriftlessness happens. sent14: the fact that the umbelliferousness does not occur and the zoolatry occurs is wrong. sent15: that the stratification happens and/or the mastering is triggered by that the defalcation does not occur. sent16: the non-curliness is prevented by that the stratification happens. sent17: that the whistling Caldwell does not occur brings about that the dressage does not occur and/or that the perviousness occurs. sent18: that the non-undiplomaticness and the non-perviousness happens prevents that the coconspiring does not occur. sent19: that the dreaming thriftlessness does not occur causes that the smiting Platonism and the substantiating occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undiplomaticness happens.; sent1 & sent12 -> int1: the fact that the non-perviousness and the undiplomaticness occurs does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__