the baboon is a dhal.
sent1: the falls is a tug-of-war. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a touched and it does geyser telecommunication the baboon is not a kind of a dhal. sent3: that the falls is not a larynx or is not a tug-of-war or both is wrong if it is broad. sent4: the fact that the shoetree simmers and geysers gowned is not incorrect if it does not flicker Cassiopeia. sent5: if the falls is not a kind of a broad that the telecommunication does not talc feast and/or is not a dhal does not hold. sent6: something is not a kind of a pasta if that it is pasta thing that is not Wordsworthian is false. sent7: the falls is a pitsaw. sent8: that something does geyser telecommunication if that it is not a larynx or a tug-of-war or both is false is correct. sent9: the falls talcs urbanity and it is a composite. sent10: the falls is a tug-of-war if it is a kind of a broad. sent11: the mesentery is a kind of a pasta if the origanum is not a kind of a pitsaw and it is not Wordsworthian. sent12: there exists something such that it is a pitsaw. sent13: the falls is a broad. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it does geyser telecommunication is true. sent15: if the fact that something is not a larynx and/or it is not a kind of a tug-of-war does not hold then it geysers telecommunication. sent16: if something is not a broad it is a dhal. sent17: the falls does not geyser telecommunication and it is not a kind of a touched if the mesentery is a kind of a pasta. sent18: the fact that the baboon is a tug-of-war is not false. sent19: if something is a pasta it is a touched. sent20: that the shoetree does not flicker Cassiopeia is true. sent21: the falls is a pitsaw and it is a pasta.
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the falls is not a kind of a larynx or it is not a kind of a tug-of-war or both is false.; sent15 -> int2: the falls does geyser telecommunication if the fact that it is not a kind of a larynx or is not a kind of a tug-of-war or both is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the falls does geyser telecommunication.; sent19 -> int4: the falls is a touched if it is a kind of a pasta.; sent21 -> int5: the falls is a pasta.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the falls is a touched.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the falls is a touched and it does geyser telecommunication hold.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a touched and it does geyser telecommunication.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the telecommunication does not talc feast or it is not a dhal or both does not hold.
sent6 -> int9: if that the baboon is pasta and is not Wordsworthian is not right it is not a pasta.;
$hypothesis$ = the baboon is a dhal. ; $context$ = sent1: the falls is a tug-of-war. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a touched and it does geyser telecommunication the baboon is not a kind of a dhal. sent3: that the falls is not a larynx or is not a tug-of-war or both is wrong if it is broad. sent4: the fact that the shoetree simmers and geysers gowned is not incorrect if it does not flicker Cassiopeia. sent5: if the falls is not a kind of a broad that the telecommunication does not talc feast and/or is not a dhal does not hold. sent6: something is not a kind of a pasta if that it is pasta thing that is not Wordsworthian is false. sent7: the falls is a pitsaw. sent8: that something does geyser telecommunication if that it is not a larynx or a tug-of-war or both is false is correct. sent9: the falls talcs urbanity and it is a composite. sent10: the falls is a tug-of-war if it is a kind of a broad. sent11: the mesentery is a kind of a pasta if the origanum is not a kind of a pitsaw and it is not Wordsworthian. sent12: there exists something such that it is a pitsaw. sent13: the falls is a broad. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it does geyser telecommunication is true. sent15: if the fact that something is not a larynx and/or it is not a kind of a tug-of-war does not hold then it geysers telecommunication. sent16: if something is not a broad it is a dhal. sent17: the falls does not geyser telecommunication and it is not a kind of a touched if the mesentery is a kind of a pasta. sent18: the fact that the baboon is a tug-of-war is not false. sent19: if something is a pasta it is a touched. sent20: that the shoetree does not flicker Cassiopeia is true. sent21: the falls is a pitsaw and it is a pasta. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the falls is not a kind of a larynx or it is not a kind of a tug-of-war or both is false.; sent15 -> int2: the falls does geyser telecommunication if the fact that it is not a kind of a larynx or is not a kind of a tug-of-war or both is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the falls does geyser telecommunication.; sent19 -> int4: the falls is a touched if it is a kind of a pasta.; sent21 -> int5: the falls is a pasta.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the falls is a touched.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the falls is a touched and it does geyser telecommunication hold.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a touched and it does geyser telecommunication.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__