the arthrosporicness does not occur if the therapeuticness does not occur but the allopatricness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the therapeuticness and the arthrosporicness occurs is false. sent2: if both the non-therapeuticness and the allopatricness occurs the arthrosporicness happens. sent3: that the non-therapeuticness and the arthrosporicness happens is incorrect. sent4: the tactfulness is prevented by that the failing conductress does not occur but the brag happens. sent5: the non-arthrosporicness is triggered by that the therapeuticness and the allopatricness occurs. sent6: the nonaccomplishment occurs. sent7: the fact that the barring vasovasostomy does not occur and the similarness happens is right. sent8: not the barring Docetism but the crapette occurs. sent9: the allopatricness occurs. sent10: the batching cerise does not occur if both the non-cesareanness and the sponsorship occurs. sent11: the devotion occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the non-therapeuticness and the allopatricness occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the therapeuticness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the arthrosporicness occurs is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the non-therapeuticness and the arthrosporicness occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the arthrosporicness does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the arthrosporicness does not occur if the therapeuticness does not occur but the allopatricness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the therapeuticness and the arthrosporicness occurs is false. sent2: if both the non-therapeuticness and the allopatricness occurs the arthrosporicness happens. sent3: that the non-therapeuticness and the arthrosporicness happens is incorrect. sent4: the tactfulness is prevented by that the failing conductress does not occur but the brag happens. sent5: the non-arthrosporicness is triggered by that the therapeuticness and the allopatricness occurs. sent6: the nonaccomplishment occurs. sent7: the fact that the barring vasovasostomy does not occur and the similarness happens is right. sent8: not the barring Docetism but the crapette occurs. sent9: the allopatricness occurs. sent10: the batching cerise does not occur if both the non-cesareanness and the sponsorship occurs. sent11: the devotion occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the non-therapeuticness and the allopatricness occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the therapeuticness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the arthrosporicness occurs is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the non-therapeuticness and the arthrosporicness occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the arthrosporicness does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__