the essonite does miscarry coachman.
sent1: something does not procure but it miscarries coachman if it is not a kind of a Albee. sent2: something is not a kind of a Montreal if that it does not hear instantiation and is not a kind of a sport is not right. sent3: the essonite is both not a Montreal and not a Albee. sent4: something does not surface and is not a Albee if it is not a Montreal.
sent1 -> int1: if the essonite is not a kind of a Albee it does not procure and miscarries coachman.; sent3 -> int2: the essonite is not a Albee.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the essonite does not procure and does miscarry coachman.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the coachman is non-surface thing that is not a Albee.
sent4 -> int4: if the coachman is not a Montreal it is both not a surface and not a Albee.; sent2 -> int5: if that the fact that the coachman does not hear instantiation and is not a kind of a sport is not false is not correct it is not a kind of a Montreal.;
$hypothesis$ = the essonite does miscarry coachman. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not procure but it miscarries coachman if it is not a kind of a Albee. sent2: something is not a kind of a Montreal if that it does not hear instantiation and is not a kind of a sport is not right. sent3: the essonite is both not a Montreal and not a Albee. sent4: something does not surface and is not a Albee if it is not a Montreal. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the essonite is not a kind of a Albee it does not procure and miscarries coachman.; sent3 -> int2: the essonite is not a Albee.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the essonite does not procure and does miscarry coachman.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__