the puka is not Satanic and it is not a kind of an enemy.
sent1: that the puka is domiciliary and it does demise Shepard is not correct. sent2: if something does not stampede Kaiser it is domiciliary. sent3: if something that prophesies is not a hymn then it is not Satanic. sent4: if the catwalk does stampede Kaiser either the puka does not prophesy or it is domiciliary or both. sent5: if that the puka is domiciliary and does demise Shepard does not hold it is domiciliary. sent6: the puka does not stampede Kaiser if that it prophesies and it is not a hymn is false. sent7: the puka does not hymn.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the puka prophesies and is not a hymn is not right is right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the puka does not stampede Kaiser.; sent2 -> int2: the puka is domiciliary if it does not stampede Kaiser.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the puka is domiciliary.; sent5 & sent1 -> int4: the puka is not domiciliary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the puka does prophesy but it is not a hymn.; sent3 -> int7: the puka is not Satanic if it does prophesy and it is not a hymn.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the puka is not Satanic is right.;
the swan does not prophesy.
$hypothesis$ = the puka is not Satanic and it is not a kind of an enemy. ; $context$ = sent1: that the puka is domiciliary and it does demise Shepard is not correct. sent2: if something does not stampede Kaiser it is domiciliary. sent3: if something that prophesies is not a hymn then it is not Satanic. sent4: if the catwalk does stampede Kaiser either the puka does not prophesy or it is domiciliary or both. sent5: if that the puka is domiciliary and does demise Shepard does not hold it is domiciliary. sent6: the puka does not stampede Kaiser if that it prophesies and it is not a hymn is false. sent7: the puka does not hymn. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the puka prophesies and is not a hymn is not right is right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the puka does not stampede Kaiser.; sent2 -> int2: the puka is domiciliary if it does not stampede Kaiser.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the puka is domiciliary.; sent5 & sent1 -> int4: the puka is not domiciliary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the puka does prophesy but it is not a hymn.; sent3 -> int7: the puka is not Satanic if it does prophesy and it is not a hymn.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the puka is not Satanic is right.; __UNKNOWN__