the fact that something lumps but it does not bind invagination is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the falangist is a kind of a seaport and does not unseal is not right if the cotenant does lump. sent2: if the fact that something is not a euphonium and it does not bind invagination is incorrect it is a euphonium. sent3: that the flask is a kind of a euphonium is not wrong if the fact that the falangist is a kind of a seaport that does not unseal is false. sent4: the snatch does not bind invagination if the cotenant does not lump. sent5: the flask does not anglicise handbow if it is a euphonium. sent6: the flask does anglicise handbow. sent7: the snatch lumps but it does not bind invagination if the cotenant does not lumps. sent8: The handbow does anglicise flask.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cotenant lumps.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the falangist is a seaport but it does not unseal is false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the flask is a kind of a euphonium.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the flask does not anglicise handbow hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cotenant does not lump.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the snatch does lump but it does not bind invagination.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the falangist does frisk hydrazoite.
sent2 -> int7: if the fact that the cotenant is not a euphonium and does not bind invagination is wrong it is a euphonium.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something lumps but it does not bind invagination is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the falangist is a kind of a seaport and does not unseal is not right if the cotenant does lump. sent2: if the fact that something is not a euphonium and it does not bind invagination is incorrect it is a euphonium. sent3: that the flask is a kind of a euphonium is not wrong if the fact that the falangist is a kind of a seaport that does not unseal is false. sent4: the snatch does not bind invagination if the cotenant does not lump. sent5: the flask does not anglicise handbow if it is a euphonium. sent6: the flask does anglicise handbow. sent7: the snatch lumps but it does not bind invagination if the cotenant does not lumps. sent8: The handbow does anglicise flask. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cotenant lumps.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the falangist is a seaport but it does not unseal is false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the flask is a kind of a euphonium.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the flask does not anglicise handbow hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cotenant does not lump.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the snatch does lump but it does not bind invagination.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__