the fact that the victor is an agronomist and/or it is a odonate is not correct.
sent1: if the appendage is not unchristian the victor is a kind of geodetic thing that is an agronomist. sent2: everything is not bionics and is not a kind of a Josephus. sent3: if something is not a scrap the fact that it is a kind of a superphylum that is unchristian does not hold. sent4: something is a kind of a scrap that is nodular if it is not geodetic. sent5: if something is not nodular but non-embolic then it does scrap. sent6: the victor does wire Benedictine. sent7: if the C does scrap and it is nodular then the appendage does not scrap. sent8: the victor is geodetic. sent9: everything is non-nodular thing that is not embolic. sent10: the appendage is earless. sent11: the hydrolysate does scrap. sent12: that the Sealyham is not a odonate is true. sent13: if the C is nodular and is not embolic then it is a scrap. sent14: if the appendage is not unchristian then the victor is geodetic. sent15: the appendage shelters ethchlorvynol. sent16: the victor does scrap. sent17: everything is non-nodular. sent18: that something is either an agronomist or a odonate or both is not correct if it does not shelter ethchlorvynol. sent19: if a non-geodetic thing is christian then it is embolic. sent20: if the appendage is a superphylum and unchristian then the C is not a scrap. sent21: the C is trophic. sent22: the appendage is a superphylum if it does shelter ethchlorvynol. sent23: the C is a Orange and it probes. sent24: The ethchlorvynol shelters appendage. sent25: the C is not nodular. sent26: if something is a kind of nodular thing that is not embolic then it is a kind of a scrap. sent27: if the victor is geodetic then it shelters ethchlorvynol.
sent22 & sent15 -> int1: the appendage is a superphylum.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appendage is unchristian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the appendage is a superphylum that is unchristian.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the C does not scrap.; sent5 -> int4: the C scraps if it is not nodular and it is not embolic.; sent9 -> int5: the C is not nodular and not embolic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the C scraps.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the appendage is not unchristian.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the victor is both not non-geodetic and an agronomist.; int9 -> int10: that the victor is an agronomist is not incorrect.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the victor is an agronomist or it is a odonate or both is not true.
sent18 -> int11: if the victor does not shelter ethchlorvynol then the fact that either it is an agronomist or it is a odonate or both is false.; sent3 -> int12: the fact that the appendage is a kind of a superphylum and is unchristian is not right if it is not a kind of a scrap.; sent4 -> int13: if the C is not geodetic then it is a scrap and it is nodular.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the victor is an agronomist and/or it is a odonate is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the appendage is not unchristian the victor is a kind of geodetic thing that is an agronomist. sent2: everything is not bionics and is not a kind of a Josephus. sent3: if something is not a scrap the fact that it is a kind of a superphylum that is unchristian does not hold. sent4: something is a kind of a scrap that is nodular if it is not geodetic. sent5: if something is not nodular but non-embolic then it does scrap. sent6: the victor does wire Benedictine. sent7: if the C does scrap and it is nodular then the appendage does not scrap. sent8: the victor is geodetic. sent9: everything is non-nodular thing that is not embolic. sent10: the appendage is earless. sent11: the hydrolysate does scrap. sent12: that the Sealyham is not a odonate is true. sent13: if the C is nodular and is not embolic then it is a scrap. sent14: if the appendage is not unchristian then the victor is geodetic. sent15: the appendage shelters ethchlorvynol. sent16: the victor does scrap. sent17: everything is non-nodular. sent18: that something is either an agronomist or a odonate or both is not correct if it does not shelter ethchlorvynol. sent19: if a non-geodetic thing is christian then it is embolic. sent20: if the appendage is a superphylum and unchristian then the C is not a scrap. sent21: the C is trophic. sent22: the appendage is a superphylum if it does shelter ethchlorvynol. sent23: the C is a Orange and it probes. sent24: The ethchlorvynol shelters appendage. sent25: the C is not nodular. sent26: if something is a kind of nodular thing that is not embolic then it is a kind of a scrap. sent27: if the victor is geodetic then it shelters ethchlorvynol. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent15 -> int1: the appendage is a superphylum.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appendage is unchristian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the appendage is a superphylum that is unchristian.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the C does not scrap.; sent5 -> int4: the C scraps if it is not nodular and it is not embolic.; sent9 -> int5: the C is not nodular and not embolic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the C scraps.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the appendage is not unchristian.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the victor is both not non-geodetic and an agronomist.; int9 -> int10: that the victor is an agronomist is not incorrect.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__