the bucktooth is a lobelia but not anaphoric.
sent1: the bucktooth is not most. sent2: the benzene perplexes neigh if that it is not consubstantial and does stigmatize conurbation is incorrect. sent3: the bucktooth is acetonic but it is not a radius if it is not anaphoric. sent4: if the bucktooth is not consubstantial it is a kind of a lobelia. sent5: the indapamide is a hernia but it is not a venogram if it is not a jeweler. sent6: The neigh perplexes bucktooth. sent7: if that the bucktooth is not a kind of a Roseau hold it is a kind of a lobelia and it is not a quarterlight. sent8: if something does sip and is isotonic then it is not naive. sent9: the scallop does perplex neigh. sent10: the bucktooth is a waxwork. sent11: the bucktooth perplexes neigh. sent12: that the bucktooth is a lobelia is correct. sent13: if something that is a waxwork perplexes neigh it is not consubstantial. sent14: the fact that something is a lobelia but it is not anaphoric is wrong if it is not a waxwork. sent15: the denaturant is not anaphoric. sent16: the photoconductivity is anaphoric. sent17: the rake is both a powerbroker and a tour. sent18: if the bucktooth is not consubstantial it is a kind of a lobelia that is not anaphoric.
sent10 & sent11 -> int1: the bucktooth is a kind of a waxwork and it perplexes neigh.; sent13 -> int2: the bucktooth is not consubstantial if it is a waxwork and it does perplex neigh.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bucktooth is not consubstantial.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bucktooth is a lobelia but it is not anaphoric is incorrect.
sent14 -> int4: if the bucktooth is not a waxwork then that it is a lobelia and it is not anaphoric is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the bucktooth is a lobelia but not anaphoric. ; $context$ = sent1: the bucktooth is not most. sent2: the benzene perplexes neigh if that it is not consubstantial and does stigmatize conurbation is incorrect. sent3: the bucktooth is acetonic but it is not a radius if it is not anaphoric. sent4: if the bucktooth is not consubstantial it is a kind of a lobelia. sent5: the indapamide is a hernia but it is not a venogram if it is not a jeweler. sent6: The neigh perplexes bucktooth. sent7: if that the bucktooth is not a kind of a Roseau hold it is a kind of a lobelia and it is not a quarterlight. sent8: if something does sip and is isotonic then it is not naive. sent9: the scallop does perplex neigh. sent10: the bucktooth is a waxwork. sent11: the bucktooth perplexes neigh. sent12: that the bucktooth is a lobelia is correct. sent13: if something that is a waxwork perplexes neigh it is not consubstantial. sent14: the fact that something is a lobelia but it is not anaphoric is wrong if it is not a waxwork. sent15: the denaturant is not anaphoric. sent16: the photoconductivity is anaphoric. sent17: the rake is both a powerbroker and a tour. sent18: if the bucktooth is not consubstantial it is a kind of a lobelia that is not anaphoric. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent11 -> int1: the bucktooth is a kind of a waxwork and it perplexes neigh.; sent13 -> int2: the bucktooth is not consubstantial if it is a waxwork and it does perplex neigh.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bucktooth is not consubstantial.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__