there is something such that if it is not veinal and it is not a bibliophile then it is not a kind of a barrel.
sent1: something is not an altitude if it is a kind of non-exegetic thing that is not a kind of an injunction. sent2: something that is both not a heatstroke and not an interaction is not rupestral. sent3: if something that is not veinal is a kind of a bibliophile it is not a barrel. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is non-Korean thing that does not criticize polystyrene is true then it is not an exercise. sent5: if something that is not veinal is not a bibliophile then it barrels. sent6: the Jacob is not a barrel if it is veinal and is not a kind of a bibliophile. sent7: if a veinal thing is not a bibliophile it does not barrel. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not veinal and is not a bibliophile it does barrel. sent9: if something that does not criticize bantam does not magnetize Prescott it does not magnetize self-pollination. sent10: if the Jacob is both not veinal and a bibliophile then the fact that it does not barrel is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-veinal thing that is a bibliophile it is not a barrel. sent12: there is something such that if it is veinal and is not a bibliophile it is not a barrel. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is not Episcopal and does not criticize gazpacho is true it is not kinetic. sent14: if the footwear is non-leaky and not veinal it is not a reinstatement. sent15: if something that is not glottochronological is not pacific it does not criticize examination. sent16: if something is a kind of non-veinal thing that is not a bibliophile then it does not barrel. sent17: if the Jacob is both not macrocosmic and not a salamander then it is not a barrel. sent18: if the Jacob is not veinal and not a bibliophile then it does barrel. sent19: the Jacob is not a barrel if it does not criticize cook and is not platonic. sent20: a non-antennal thing that is not a kind of a resoluteness does not criticize prevalence.
sent16 -> int1: the Jacob is not a barrel if it is a kind of non-veinal thing that is not a bibliophile.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is non-antennal and it is not a kind of a resoluteness then the fact that it does not criticize prevalence is not incorrect.
sent20 -> int2: the polystyrene does not criticize prevalence if it is not antennal and it is not a resoluteness.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not veinal and it is not a bibliophile then it is not a kind of a barrel. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not an altitude if it is a kind of non-exegetic thing that is not a kind of an injunction. sent2: something that is both not a heatstroke and not an interaction is not rupestral. sent3: if something that is not veinal is a kind of a bibliophile it is not a barrel. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is non-Korean thing that does not criticize polystyrene is true then it is not an exercise. sent5: if something that is not veinal is not a bibliophile then it barrels. sent6: the Jacob is not a barrel if it is veinal and is not a kind of a bibliophile. sent7: if a veinal thing is not a bibliophile it does not barrel. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not veinal and is not a bibliophile it does barrel. sent9: if something that does not criticize bantam does not magnetize Prescott it does not magnetize self-pollination. sent10: if the Jacob is both not veinal and a bibliophile then the fact that it does not barrel is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-veinal thing that is a bibliophile it is not a barrel. sent12: there is something such that if it is veinal and is not a bibliophile it is not a barrel. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is not Episcopal and does not criticize gazpacho is true it is not kinetic. sent14: if the footwear is non-leaky and not veinal it is not a reinstatement. sent15: if something that is not glottochronological is not pacific it does not criticize examination. sent16: if something is a kind of non-veinal thing that is not a bibliophile then it does not barrel. sent17: if the Jacob is both not macrocosmic and not a salamander then it is not a barrel. sent18: if the Jacob is not veinal and not a bibliophile then it does barrel. sent19: the Jacob is not a barrel if it does not criticize cook and is not platonic. sent20: a non-antennal thing that is not a kind of a resoluteness does not criticize prevalence. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the Jacob is not a barrel if it is a kind of non-veinal thing that is not a bibliophile.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__