the descending but not the appraisal happens.
sent1: the gonioscopy does not occur if the clanking peace occurs. sent2: the fact that the clanking Baptists does not occur hold if the CPR occurs. sent3: the fact that the crooking gloat but not the land happens does not hold. sent4: if the multiplication occurs then the leafiness happens. sent5: the Reformation occurs. sent6: the posting or the lamentation or both occurs. sent7: the fact that both the dare and the non-morphophonemicness happens is not right. sent8: if the bullfighting does not occur then that that the stopover happens and the Energy does not occur is wrong is right. sent9: the multiplication happens. sent10: if the backstroking does not occur then that both the ruffianism and the bullfighting occurs is incorrect. sent11: if the incredibleness does not occur then the fact that both the descending and the appraisal happens is wrong. sent12: the leafiness does not occur if either the incredibleness occurs or the clanking metopion happens or both. sent13: if the nod occurs then the diclinousness does not occur. sent14: if the incredibleness does not occur the fact that the descending but not the appraisal happens is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incredibleness happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the incredibleness occurs or the clanking metopion occurs or both.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the leafiness does not occur.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: the leafiness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the incredibleness does not occur.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the descending but not the appraisal happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the gonioscopy does not occur if the clanking peace occurs. sent2: the fact that the clanking Baptists does not occur hold if the CPR occurs. sent3: the fact that the crooking gloat but not the land happens does not hold. sent4: if the multiplication occurs then the leafiness happens. sent5: the Reformation occurs. sent6: the posting or the lamentation or both occurs. sent7: the fact that both the dare and the non-morphophonemicness happens is not right. sent8: if the bullfighting does not occur then that that the stopover happens and the Energy does not occur is wrong is right. sent9: the multiplication happens. sent10: if the backstroking does not occur then that both the ruffianism and the bullfighting occurs is incorrect. sent11: if the incredibleness does not occur then the fact that both the descending and the appraisal happens is wrong. sent12: the leafiness does not occur if either the incredibleness occurs or the clanking metopion happens or both. sent13: if the nod occurs then the diclinousness does not occur. sent14: if the incredibleness does not occur the fact that the descending but not the appraisal happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incredibleness happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the incredibleness occurs or the clanking metopion occurs or both.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the leafiness does not occur.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: the leafiness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the incredibleness does not occur.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__