that the glass-cutter does not read brant and is a kind of a fang does not hold.
sent1: if something is not sexy then it is a migration and it reads unhealthfulness. sent2: the fact that something does not read brant and is a fang is false if it is a kind of a migration. sent3: if that the Oklahoman spooks and is acculturational does not hold the glass-cutter is not a lamedh. sent4: if that the glass-cutter does not spook and it is not acculturational is false then it is not unaware. sent5: the introvert reads unhealthfulness. sent6: the introvert is not sexy if either it is a migration or it reads unhealthfulness or both. sent7: The unhealthfulness reads introvert. sent8: something is unaware if it is not sexy. sent9: if something is unaware then the fact that the Oklahoman does spook and it is acculturational is false. sent10: the glass-cutter does not read brant but it is a fang if it is not a lamedh.
sent5 -> int1: the introvert is a kind of a migration or it does read unhealthfulness or both.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the introvert is not sexy.; sent8 -> int3: if the introvert is not sexy then that it is unaware is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the introvert is unaware hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is unaware.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the Oklahoman does spook and it is acculturational does not hold.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the glass-cutter is not a lamedh is not false.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the glass-cutter does not read brant but it is a fang is not right.
sent2 -> int8: if the glass-cutter is a kind of a migration that it does not read brant and is a fang is incorrect.; sent1 -> int9: if the glass-cutter is not sexy it is a kind of a migration and it does read unhealthfulness.;
$hypothesis$ = that the glass-cutter does not read brant and is a kind of a fang does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not sexy then it is a migration and it reads unhealthfulness. sent2: the fact that something does not read brant and is a fang is false if it is a kind of a migration. sent3: if that the Oklahoman spooks and is acculturational does not hold the glass-cutter is not a lamedh. sent4: if that the glass-cutter does not spook and it is not acculturational is false then it is not unaware. sent5: the introvert reads unhealthfulness. sent6: the introvert is not sexy if either it is a migration or it reads unhealthfulness or both. sent7: The unhealthfulness reads introvert. sent8: something is unaware if it is not sexy. sent9: if something is unaware then the fact that the Oklahoman does spook and it is acculturational is false. sent10: the glass-cutter does not read brant but it is a fang if it is not a lamedh. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the introvert is a kind of a migration or it does read unhealthfulness or both.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the introvert is not sexy.; sent8 -> int3: if the introvert is not sexy then that it is unaware is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the introvert is unaware hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is unaware.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the Oklahoman does spook and it is acculturational does not hold.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the glass-cutter is not a lamedh is not false.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__