the promenade is not tracheal.
sent1: the promenade is larval. sent2: there are cubist things. sent3: the promenade is Pauline. sent4: if the dynamometer is not a cubist the fact that that the chemical is tracheal and does not upgrade hold is wrong. sent5: if the peeper does not cram peeper that the vagrant is not a kind of a subset but it is a kind of a cubist is not true. sent6: if that the promenade is not tracheal is not false the fact that it is larval and it is not dissuasive does not hold. sent7: there is something such that it is tracheal. sent8: if the chemical is tracheal then that the promenade is Pavlovian but it is not a bellow is not right. sent9: if there is something such that it is not non-cubist then the promenade is not non-larval but it is not dissuasive. sent10: if there are cubist things the promenade is larval. sent11: if the Cologne does hum worthy and does not cram peeper the peeper does not cram peeper.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the promenade is not tracheal is true.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the promenade is larval and is non-dissuasive is not correct.; sent2 & sent9 -> int2: the promenade is larval thing that is not dissuasive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the promenade is not non-Pavlovian and not a bellow is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the promenade is not tracheal. ; $context$ = sent1: the promenade is larval. sent2: there are cubist things. sent3: the promenade is Pauline. sent4: if the dynamometer is not a cubist the fact that that the chemical is tracheal and does not upgrade hold is wrong. sent5: if the peeper does not cram peeper that the vagrant is not a kind of a subset but it is a kind of a cubist is not true. sent6: if that the promenade is not tracheal is not false the fact that it is larval and it is not dissuasive does not hold. sent7: there is something such that it is tracheal. sent8: if the chemical is tracheal then that the promenade is Pavlovian but it is not a bellow is not right. sent9: if there is something such that it is not non-cubist then the promenade is not non-larval but it is not dissuasive. sent10: if there are cubist things the promenade is larval. sent11: if the Cologne does hum worthy and does not cram peeper the peeper does not cram peeper. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the promenade is not tracheal is true.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the promenade is larval and is non-dissuasive is not correct.; sent2 & sent9 -> int2: the promenade is larval thing that is not dissuasive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__