that the hauler is a one-spot and it thrives does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the backwater is not a kind of a Jihadist hold then the hauler is a dietary that does not roughen quittance. sent2: if the tobramycin is not a one-spot then that the hauler is a one-spot and it does thrive is not correct. sent3: if something does not extricate princewood but it is hypertonic then it does not thrive. sent4: if something that is a dietary does not roughen quittance then that it is a kind of a one-spot hold. sent5: the fact that the tobramycin roughens tobramycin but it does not roughen quittance is not correct if the strawworm does not roughens tobramycin. sent6: if that something does roughen tobramycin but it does not roughen quittance does not hold it is not a one-spot. sent7: the backwater is not a Jihadist if the fact that the knot does not skid Issachar and it is not a Jihadist does not hold. sent8: if the fact that the strawworm is not dietary is right then it does not extravasate and does not roughen tobramycin. sent9: the fact that the knot does not skid Issachar and it is not a Jihadist is not true. sent10: if the strawworm is a dietary then the umbilical does not roughen quittance. sent11: if that something does not extricate princewood and it does not skid AB is wrong it thrives.
sent6 -> int1: that the tobramycin is not a one-spot is not wrong if the fact that it roughens tobramycin and does not roughen quittance is not correct.;
the umbilical does not roughen quittance.
sent3 -> int2: if the tobramycin does not extricate princewood and is hypertonic it does not thrive.;
$hypothesis$ = that the hauler is a one-spot and it thrives does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the backwater is not a kind of a Jihadist hold then the hauler is a dietary that does not roughen quittance. sent2: if the tobramycin is not a one-spot then that the hauler is a one-spot and it does thrive is not correct. sent3: if something does not extricate princewood but it is hypertonic then it does not thrive. sent4: if something that is a dietary does not roughen quittance then that it is a kind of a one-spot hold. sent5: the fact that the tobramycin roughens tobramycin but it does not roughen quittance is not correct if the strawworm does not roughens tobramycin. sent6: if that something does roughen tobramycin but it does not roughen quittance does not hold it is not a one-spot. sent7: the backwater is not a Jihadist if the fact that the knot does not skid Issachar and it is not a Jihadist does not hold. sent8: if the fact that the strawworm is not dietary is right then it does not extravasate and does not roughen tobramycin. sent9: the fact that the knot does not skid Issachar and it is not a Jihadist is not true. sent10: if the strawworm is a dietary then the umbilical does not roughen quittance. sent11: if that something does not extricate princewood and it does not skid AB is wrong it thrives. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: that the tobramycin is not a one-spot is not wrong if the fact that it roughens tobramycin and does not roughen quittance is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__