the quartzite is a kind of a klavern if the whiff is a ricochet.
sent1: if the miler is not sinkable then the Protropin faces. sent2: the whiff is not a ricochet if the miler is not a originalism and not a face. sent3: the Protropin is not a kind of a ricochet and is sinkable. sent4: the whiff is not a kind of a ricochet if that the Protropin is not a kind of a originalism and it is not unsinkable is true. sent5: the Protropin is a ricochet if the fact that it is not a kind of a ricochet and it is not a klavern is not correct. sent6: if that the miler is a klavern is not false the quartzite deaminates Klinefelter. sent7: that the Protropin is both not a face and not syllogistic is false if it is a ricochet. sent8: the Protropin does not deaminate Klinefelter. sent9: the quartzite is a klavern if either something is a face or it does deaminate Klinefelter or both. sent10: the whiff is a ricochet if the Protropin is not a kind of a originalism and is not unsinkable. sent11: the RN is not a kind of a prolapse and it is not unsinkable. sent12: the Protropin is not a face if the miler is not unsinkable. sent13: the quartzite is a klavern if something does deaminate Klinefelter. sent14: the Protropin is sinkable. sent15: the whiff is a originalism if the Protropin is not a ricochet and it is not unsinkable. sent16: the fact that if the miler does not face then the Protropin is not a originalism and is not unsinkable is not false. sent17: if the Protropin is not a originalism but unsinkable the whiff is not a ricochet. sent18: if the miler is not a kind of a face the Protropin is not unsinkable.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the whiff is a ricochet.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the miler is not a kind of a face.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the Protropin is not a kind of a originalism and it is not unsinkable.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the whiff is not a ricochet.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the miler is a face hold.; int4 -> int5: the miler faces or it does deaminate Klinefelter or both.; int5 -> int6: that there exists something such that it either does face or deaminates Klinefelter or both is not wrong.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the quartzite is a klavern.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that either it is a penult or it is syllogistic or both.
$hypothesis$ = the quartzite is a kind of a klavern if the whiff is a ricochet. ; $context$ = sent1: if the miler is not sinkable then the Protropin faces. sent2: the whiff is not a ricochet if the miler is not a originalism and not a face. sent3: the Protropin is not a kind of a ricochet and is sinkable. sent4: the whiff is not a kind of a ricochet if that the Protropin is not a kind of a originalism and it is not unsinkable is true. sent5: the Protropin is a ricochet if the fact that it is not a kind of a ricochet and it is not a klavern is not correct. sent6: if that the miler is a klavern is not false the quartzite deaminates Klinefelter. sent7: that the Protropin is both not a face and not syllogistic is false if it is a ricochet. sent8: the Protropin does not deaminate Klinefelter. sent9: the quartzite is a klavern if either something is a face or it does deaminate Klinefelter or both. sent10: the whiff is a ricochet if the Protropin is not a kind of a originalism and is not unsinkable. sent11: the RN is not a kind of a prolapse and it is not unsinkable. sent12: the Protropin is not a face if the miler is not unsinkable. sent13: the quartzite is a klavern if something does deaminate Klinefelter. sent14: the Protropin is sinkable. sent15: the whiff is a originalism if the Protropin is not a ricochet and it is not unsinkable. sent16: the fact that if the miler does not face then the Protropin is not a originalism and is not unsinkable is not false. sent17: if the Protropin is not a originalism but unsinkable the whiff is not a ricochet. sent18: if the miler is not a kind of a face the Protropin is not unsinkable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the whiff is a ricochet.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the miler is not a kind of a face.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the Protropin is not a kind of a originalism and it is not unsinkable.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the whiff is not a ricochet.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the miler is a face hold.; int4 -> int5: the miler faces or it does deaminate Klinefelter or both.; int5 -> int6: that there exists something such that it either does face or deaminates Klinefelter or both is not wrong.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the quartzite is a klavern.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__