the jackscrew is a kind of non-viviparous a Haemosporidia.
sent1: that the jackscrew is viviparous and it is a Haemosporidia does not hold. sent2: if the gadfly is a kind of a agapanthus the periosteum is supervisory. sent3: the gadfly is a kind of a agapanthus if that it does not exclaim and it is not over-the-counter is incorrect. sent4: there are non-supervisory things. sent5: the fact that the gadfly does not exclaim hold if the fact that it exclaim and is over-the-counter is not correct. sent6: if something is viviparous then it exclaims. sent7: if the fact that something is not viviparous but it is a kind of a Haemosporidia does not hold it does exclaim. sent8: if the jackscrew does exclaim then the fact that the gadfly does not exclaim and is not over-the-counter is false. sent9: if there is something such that it is not lidless and it is servile then the periosteum is not supervisory. sent10: something is lidded and servile.
sent7 -> int1: if that that the jackscrew is not viviparous but it is a Haemosporidia hold is wrong it exclaims.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the jackscrew is not viviparous but a Haemosporidia is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the jackscrew does exclaim.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the gadfly does not exclaim and is not over-the-counter is wrong.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the gadfly is a agapanthus.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the periosteum is supervisory.; sent10 & sent9 -> int6: the periosteum is not supervisory.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the jackscrew is a kind of non-viviparous thing that is a Haemosporidia does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the jackscrew is a kind of non-viviparous a Haemosporidia. ; $context$ = sent1: that the jackscrew is viviparous and it is a Haemosporidia does not hold. sent2: if the gadfly is a kind of a agapanthus the periosteum is supervisory. sent3: the gadfly is a kind of a agapanthus if that it does not exclaim and it is not over-the-counter is incorrect. sent4: there are non-supervisory things. sent5: the fact that the gadfly does not exclaim hold if the fact that it exclaim and is over-the-counter is not correct. sent6: if something is viviparous then it exclaims. sent7: if the fact that something is not viviparous but it is a kind of a Haemosporidia does not hold it does exclaim. sent8: if the jackscrew does exclaim then the fact that the gadfly does not exclaim and is not over-the-counter is false. sent9: if there is something such that it is not lidless and it is servile then the periosteum is not supervisory. sent10: something is lidded and servile. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if that that the jackscrew is not viviparous but it is a Haemosporidia hold is wrong it exclaims.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the jackscrew is not viviparous but a Haemosporidia is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the jackscrew does exclaim.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the gadfly does not exclaim and is not over-the-counter is wrong.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the gadfly is a agapanthus.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the periosteum is supervisory.; sent10 & sent9 -> int6: the periosteum is not supervisory.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__