the fact that the muffing sacrilegiousness does not occur if the transference occurs does not hold.
sent1: if the neoplasticness does not occur then the muffing sacrilegiousness does not occur and the transference occurs. sent2: that both the destaining fleawort and the sounding constructivist happens is not right if the destaining endgame happens. sent3: that the transference happens is caused by that the sounding yak and the muffing sacrilegiousness occurs. sent4: the muffing sacrilegiousness occurs if the transference happens. sent5: the boondoggling does not occur if the Rhenishness happens. sent6: the thunderstorm does not occur. sent7: the sounding yak occurs if that the destaining fleawort does not occur and the sounding constructivist happens is not true. sent8: that both the sounding yak and the muffing sacrilegiousness happens prevents the transference. sent9: the non-neoplasticness is triggered by that the non-crinoidness and/or the naturalizing happens. sent10: that that not the liberty but the chatter occurs is right is not right if the sounding Sturnidae happens. sent11: the destaining fleawort yields the sounding yak. sent12: the sounding Sturnidae occurs. sent13: if the muffing sacrilegiousness does not occur but the transference occurs the destaining fleawort does not occur. sent14: that the sounding Sturnidae happens and the destaining endgame occurs is right. sent15: if the destaining endgame occurs then the fact that the destaining fleawort does not occur and the sounding constructivist happens is not right. sent16: that that the destaining fleawort occurs and the sounding constructivist happens is wrong is right. sent17: that the crinoidness and the spree happens is not wrong. sent18: that the sounding constructivist occurs and the sounding yak occurs is wrong if the destaining fleawort does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the transference occurs.; sent14 -> int1: the destaining endgame happens.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: that the destaining fleawort does not occur but the sounding constructivist happens does not hold.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the sounding yak occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the muffing sacrilegiousness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the sounding yak and the muffing sacrilegiousness happens.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: that the transference occurs is not true.; assump2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the muffing sacrilegiousness does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the liberty does not occur and the chattering happens is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the muffing sacrilegiousness does not occur if the transference occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the neoplasticness does not occur then the muffing sacrilegiousness does not occur and the transference occurs. sent2: that both the destaining fleawort and the sounding constructivist happens is not right if the destaining endgame happens. sent3: that the transference happens is caused by that the sounding yak and the muffing sacrilegiousness occurs. sent4: the muffing sacrilegiousness occurs if the transference happens. sent5: the boondoggling does not occur if the Rhenishness happens. sent6: the thunderstorm does not occur. sent7: the sounding yak occurs if that the destaining fleawort does not occur and the sounding constructivist happens is not true. sent8: that both the sounding yak and the muffing sacrilegiousness happens prevents the transference. sent9: the non-neoplasticness is triggered by that the non-crinoidness and/or the naturalizing happens. sent10: that that not the liberty but the chatter occurs is right is not right if the sounding Sturnidae happens. sent11: the destaining fleawort yields the sounding yak. sent12: the sounding Sturnidae occurs. sent13: if the muffing sacrilegiousness does not occur but the transference occurs the destaining fleawort does not occur. sent14: that the sounding Sturnidae happens and the destaining endgame occurs is right. sent15: if the destaining endgame occurs then the fact that the destaining fleawort does not occur and the sounding constructivist happens is not right. sent16: that that the destaining fleawort occurs and the sounding constructivist happens is wrong is right. sent17: that the crinoidness and the spree happens is not wrong. sent18: that the sounding constructivist occurs and the sounding yak occurs is wrong if the destaining fleawort does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the transference occurs.; sent14 -> int1: the destaining endgame happens.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: that the destaining fleawort does not occur but the sounding constructivist happens does not hold.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the sounding yak occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the muffing sacrilegiousness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the sounding yak and the muffing sacrilegiousness happens.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: that the transference occurs is not true.; assump2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the muffing sacrilegiousness does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__