the vamp does birdnest and is a kind of a whitethorn.
sent1: if that the length is pure is not incorrect it does not numerate pharmacy and it bars bonyness. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not bar length and is reconcilable is incorrect. sent3: that something is a birdnest and it is a kind of a whitethorn is wrong if it is not pure. sent4: if something is not synergistic it is not instructive and/or it does not bar dispenser. sent5: if the fact that the length does not numerate Roccus and is not a heartrot is not true the vamp is not pure. sent6: if there exists something such that that it does not bar length and is reconcilable does not hold then the nonreader is not sensory. sent7: something is not a Mach if it does not bar dispenser. sent8: if the dispenser is reverent the vamp is a Mach. sent9: the nonreader does not numerate Roccus if the length does not numerate pharmacy and bars bonyness. sent10: if there is something such that it bars dispenser the nonreader does bars dispenser. sent11: the length does not numerate pharmacy. sent12: the nonreader is non-prokaryotic thing that is non-electrical if it is not sensory. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-synergistic thing that does not bar dispenser is incorrect then the nonreader bar dispenser. sent14: something that is not a Mach is not reverent. sent15: something is not a Mach if it is not instructive. sent16: something is a birdnest if it is a Mach. sent17: there is something such that that it is not synergistic and does not bar dispenser is not true. sent18: if something that is not prokaryotic is non-electrical it is not synergistic. sent19: the vamp is a whitethorn. sent20: the dispenser is not a heartrot. sent21: the dispenser is reverent if it is not pure and is not a heartrot. sent22: if something does bar dispenser then it does numerate Roccus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the length is pure.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the length does not numerate pharmacy but it does bar bonyness.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the nonreader does not numerate Roccus.; sent22 -> int3: if the nonreader does bar dispenser it numerates Roccus.; sent17 & sent13 -> int4: the nonreader does bar dispenser.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the nonreader does numerate Roccus.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the length is not pure.; sent16 -> int8: if the vamp is a kind of a Mach it does birdnest.;
the fact that the vamp birdnests and is a whitethorn is not right.
sent3 -> int9: that the vamp is a birdnest and a whitethorn is not right if it is not pure.; sent14 -> int10: if the fact that the nonreader is not a Mach is true then it is not reverent.; sent4 -> int11: if the nonreader is not synergistic that it is not instructive or does not bar dispenser or both is not false.; sent18 -> int12: if the nonreader is non-prokaryotic thing that is not electrical then it is not synergistic.; sent2 & sent6 -> int13: the nonreader is not sensory.; sent12 & int13 -> int14: the nonreader is not prokaryotic and not electrical.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the nonreader is not synergistic.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the nonreader either is not instructive or does not bar dispenser or both.; sent15 -> int17: the nonreader is not a kind of a Mach if it is uninstructive.; sent7 -> int18: if the nonreader does not bar dispenser then it is not a Mach.; int16 & int17 & int18 -> int19: the nonreader is not a Mach.; int10 & int19 -> int20: the nonreader is not reverent.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that it is not reverent.;
$hypothesis$ = the vamp does birdnest and is a kind of a whitethorn. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the length is pure is not incorrect it does not numerate pharmacy and it bars bonyness. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not bar length and is reconcilable is incorrect. sent3: that something is a birdnest and it is a kind of a whitethorn is wrong if it is not pure. sent4: if something is not synergistic it is not instructive and/or it does not bar dispenser. sent5: if the fact that the length does not numerate Roccus and is not a heartrot is not true the vamp is not pure. sent6: if there exists something such that that it does not bar length and is reconcilable does not hold then the nonreader is not sensory. sent7: something is not a Mach if it does not bar dispenser. sent8: if the dispenser is reverent the vamp is a Mach. sent9: the nonreader does not numerate Roccus if the length does not numerate pharmacy and bars bonyness. sent10: if there is something such that it bars dispenser the nonreader does bars dispenser. sent11: the length does not numerate pharmacy. sent12: the nonreader is non-prokaryotic thing that is non-electrical if it is not sensory. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-synergistic thing that does not bar dispenser is incorrect then the nonreader bar dispenser. sent14: something that is not a Mach is not reverent. sent15: something is not a Mach if it is not instructive. sent16: something is a birdnest if it is a Mach. sent17: there is something such that that it is not synergistic and does not bar dispenser is not true. sent18: if something that is not prokaryotic is non-electrical it is not synergistic. sent19: the vamp is a whitethorn. sent20: the dispenser is not a heartrot. sent21: the dispenser is reverent if it is not pure and is not a heartrot. sent22: if something does bar dispenser then it does numerate Roccus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the length is pure.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the length does not numerate pharmacy but it does bar bonyness.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the nonreader does not numerate Roccus.; sent22 -> int3: if the nonreader does bar dispenser it numerates Roccus.; sent17 & sent13 -> int4: the nonreader does bar dispenser.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the nonreader does numerate Roccus.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the length is not pure.; sent16 -> int8: if the vamp is a kind of a Mach it does birdnest.; __UNKNOWN__