there is something such that if it does exsiccate solenoid then that it is not replaceable and it is ritualistic is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is postdoctoral then the fact that it is both unnatural and not non-dysplastic is not true. sent2: the fact that something is not male but a tip is incorrect if it is a kind of a Polyplacophora. sent3: the fact that something is not irreplaceable and not non-ritualistic does not hold if it does exsiccate solenoid. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it exsiccates solenoid is correct the fact that it is a kind of replaceable thing that is ritualistic does not hold. sent5: something is a kind of non-replaceable thing that is ritualistic if the fact that it does exsiccate solenoid hold. sent6: if the fact that the Pomeranian exsiccates solenoid is not wrong the fact that the fact that it is replaceable and it is ritualistic hold is not right. sent7: there exists something such that if it does last then that it is a kind of indispensable a siamese is not right. sent8: if something does churn criminology that it does not broach and it does rap sleepwalker is not correct. sent9: if the Pomeranian exsiccates solenoid that it does not emblazon and is a madnep is false. sent10: the Pomeranian is non-replaceable thing that is ritualistic if it does exsiccate solenoid. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a mandator the fact that it is not rabbinical and is dispensable does not hold. sent12: if something is deficient the fact that it does not rap derv and it is patriotic is not true. sent13: the fact that the set-back is a kind of irreplaceable thing that is profound is not true if it is palatable. sent14: that something is a kind of non-convex a cry is wrong if it is a commute. sent15: the fact that the Pomeranian does not churn upbeat and is acetic is not true if it is a Carrel. sent16: if the Pomeranian does till then the fact that it is not replaceable and is a kind of a Ictalurus is not true. sent17: that something is not a Tractarianism but it churns Swanson is not right if it is cadastral. sent18: there exists something such that if it exsiccates solenoid it is not replaceable and is ritualistic. sent19: if something is deficient that it is not a Tractarianism and is a Gymnosporangium does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does exsiccate solenoid then that it is not replaceable and it is ritualistic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is postdoctoral then the fact that it is both unnatural and not non-dysplastic is not true. sent2: the fact that something is not male but a tip is incorrect if it is a kind of a Polyplacophora. sent3: the fact that something is not irreplaceable and not non-ritualistic does not hold if it does exsiccate solenoid. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it exsiccates solenoid is correct the fact that it is a kind of replaceable thing that is ritualistic does not hold. sent5: something is a kind of non-replaceable thing that is ritualistic if the fact that it does exsiccate solenoid hold. sent6: if the fact that the Pomeranian exsiccates solenoid is not wrong the fact that the fact that it is replaceable and it is ritualistic hold is not right. sent7: there exists something such that if it does last then that it is a kind of indispensable a siamese is not right. sent8: if something does churn criminology that it does not broach and it does rap sleepwalker is not correct. sent9: if the Pomeranian exsiccates solenoid that it does not emblazon and is a madnep is false. sent10: the Pomeranian is non-replaceable thing that is ritualistic if it does exsiccate solenoid. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a mandator the fact that it is not rabbinical and is dispensable does not hold. sent12: if something is deficient the fact that it does not rap derv and it is patriotic is not true. sent13: the fact that the set-back is a kind of irreplaceable thing that is profound is not true if it is palatable. sent14: that something is a kind of non-convex a cry is wrong if it is a commute. sent15: the fact that the Pomeranian does not churn upbeat and is acetic is not true if it is a Carrel. sent16: if the Pomeranian does till then the fact that it is not replaceable and is a kind of a Ictalurus is not true. sent17: that something is not a Tractarianism but it churns Swanson is not right if it is cadastral. sent18: there exists something such that if it exsiccates solenoid it is not replaceable and is ritualistic. sent19: if something is deficient that it is not a Tractarianism and is a Gymnosporangium does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__