the puck is a kind of a dishabille and is not non-sleeveless.
sent1: the ceratopsian does snowmobile if there exists something such that the fact that it is a jacamar and it is not unserviceable is wrong. sent2: the Hooker is not sleeveless if there exists something such that it is microbial. sent3: there is nothing such that it is a feint and a roots. sent4: something that is not a kind of a snowmobile is a dishabille that is sleeveless. sent5: if the rhyolite is not a throw the painter does not invest widowed. sent6: the Hooker is not sleeveless if something does unloose intimidation and/or it is not non-microbial. sent7: if something that does not invest filly is not non-adjudicative it is not an inducement. sent8: if something is not an inducement it tabulates Hygrocybe and is a kind of a garbage. sent9: that the commentator is a jacamar and it is unserviceable is wrong. sent10: either the ceratopsian is a dishabille or it does snowmobile or both. sent11: if the rhyolite does not invest widowed then the painter does not invest widowed. sent12: if the ceratopsian is a snowmobile the cotter unlooses intimidation. sent13: there is nothing that is both a jacamar and not unserviceable. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a snowmobile and/or it is a jacamar. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is sleeveless thing that does not unloose intimidation is wrong. sent16: if the painter tabulates Hygrocybe then the fact that the Hooker does not invest cotter and it does not flatten is not true. sent17: the rhyolite is not a throw and/or it does not invest widowed. sent18: the Hooker is a dishabille if the puck is sleeveless. sent19: the ceratopsian is a snowmobile if there are unserviceable things. sent20: the fact that something is not a snowmobile and does not unloose intimidation is wrong if it is microbial. sent21: the painter does not invest filly and is adjudicative if it does not invest widowed. sent22: if that the cotter is a kind of a Latinism hold the fact that the ceratopsian is microbial is true. sent23: there is something such that that it is a jacamar and unserviceable is not correct. sent24: that the puck is both a dishabille and sleeveless is not right if the Hooker is not sleeveless. sent25: there exists nothing that does unloose qadi and is a arctiid.
sent13 -> int1: the fact that the commentator is a jacamar but it is not unserviceable is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a jacamar that is not unserviceable is incorrect.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the ceratopsian is a kind of a snowmobile.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the cotter does unloose intimidation.; int4 -> int5: the cotter either unlooses intimidation or is microbial or both.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that either it unlooses intimidation or it is microbial or both.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the Hooker is not sleeveless.; sent24 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the puck is a kind of a dishabille that is sleeveless.
sent4 -> int8: if that the puck does not snowmobile is not wrong then it is a dishabille that is sleeveless.; sent20 -> int9: that the ceratopsian is not a kind of a snowmobile and does not unloose intimidation is wrong if it is microbial.; sent8 -> int10: the painter tabulates Hygrocybe and is a garbage if it is not an inducement.; sent7 -> int11: the painter is not an inducement if it does not invest filly and is adjudicative.; sent17 & sent5 & sent11 -> int12: the painter does not invest widowed.; sent21 & int12 -> int13: the painter does not invest filly but it is adjudicative.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the painter is not an inducement.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the painter tabulates Hygrocybe and is a garbage.; int15 -> int16: the painter tabulates Hygrocybe.; sent16 & int16 -> int17: that the Hooker does not invest cotter and does not flatten is not correct.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that that it does not invest cotter and does not flatten does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the puck is a kind of a dishabille and is not non-sleeveless. ; $context$ = sent1: the ceratopsian does snowmobile if there exists something such that the fact that it is a jacamar and it is not unserviceable is wrong. sent2: the Hooker is not sleeveless if there exists something such that it is microbial. sent3: there is nothing such that it is a feint and a roots. sent4: something that is not a kind of a snowmobile is a dishabille that is sleeveless. sent5: if the rhyolite is not a throw the painter does not invest widowed. sent6: the Hooker is not sleeveless if something does unloose intimidation and/or it is not non-microbial. sent7: if something that does not invest filly is not non-adjudicative it is not an inducement. sent8: if something is not an inducement it tabulates Hygrocybe and is a kind of a garbage. sent9: that the commentator is a jacamar and it is unserviceable is wrong. sent10: either the ceratopsian is a dishabille or it does snowmobile or both. sent11: if the rhyolite does not invest widowed then the painter does not invest widowed. sent12: if the ceratopsian is a snowmobile the cotter unlooses intimidation. sent13: there is nothing that is both a jacamar and not unserviceable. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a snowmobile and/or it is a jacamar. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is sleeveless thing that does not unloose intimidation is wrong. sent16: if the painter tabulates Hygrocybe then the fact that the Hooker does not invest cotter and it does not flatten is not true. sent17: the rhyolite is not a throw and/or it does not invest widowed. sent18: the Hooker is a dishabille if the puck is sleeveless. sent19: the ceratopsian is a snowmobile if there are unserviceable things. sent20: the fact that something is not a snowmobile and does not unloose intimidation is wrong if it is microbial. sent21: the painter does not invest filly and is adjudicative if it does not invest widowed. sent22: if that the cotter is a kind of a Latinism hold the fact that the ceratopsian is microbial is true. sent23: there is something such that that it is a jacamar and unserviceable is not correct. sent24: that the puck is both a dishabille and sleeveless is not right if the Hooker is not sleeveless. sent25: there exists nothing that does unloose qadi and is a arctiid. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the fact that the commentator is a jacamar but it is not unserviceable is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a jacamar that is not unserviceable is incorrect.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the ceratopsian is a kind of a snowmobile.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the cotter does unloose intimidation.; int4 -> int5: the cotter either unlooses intimidation or is microbial or both.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that either it unlooses intimidation or it is microbial or both.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the Hooker is not sleeveless.; sent24 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__