that the trochlear either is not a kind of a Michener or does not poach or both is not true.
sent1: that that the crystallite is not a kind of a Michener and/or it is not a sugarloaf does not hold if that the cere is not a Michener is not false hold. sent2: if there is something such that it is not sidereal the couch is a sugarloaf and is not a kind of a talkie. sent3: the cere is phalangeal if the fact that the crystallite is terrestrial is correct. sent4: the hemstitch is not a Michener if there is something such that the fact that it is a Michener and does not ignore pseudophloem is not right. sent5: the fact that the trochlear is a Michener and is a admirability is not right. sent6: the membrane is regenerate and it is not non-idiopathic if the fact that it does not powderize is right. sent7: if the crystallite is not a Michener the fact that the trochlear either is not a Michener or does not poach or both is not true. sent8: the trochlear is a Michener and/or it is a talkie. sent9: if something ignores pseudophloem then that that it is terrestrial and is phalangeal is not false does not hold. sent10: the fact that the membrane is both a tete-a-tete and not an amelioration is false. sent11: if the hemstitch is not a talkie the fact that the cere is both not a talkie and not a sugarloaf is not correct. sent12: if the archespore is not graphic then it does ignore pseudophloem. sent13: the finback is not sidereal if there is something such that that it is sidereal thing that does not varnish cryophobia is not right. sent14: the hemstitch is not a talkie if that either the archespore is a admirability or it is not a kind of a graphic or both does not hold. sent15: the membrane does not powderize if that it is a tete-a-tete and it is not an amelioration is not true. sent16: if the crystallite is phalangeal then the cere is phalangeal. sent17: if the cere is a sugarloaf the fact that the fact that it is a admirability and it is phalangeal is correct does not hold. sent18: that the cere is a Michener that does not ignore pseudophloem does not hold if it is phalangeal. sent19: something ignores pseudophloem if it is a admirability and/or it is not a kind of a graphic. sent20: the fact that if the couch is not a talkie then the crystallite is terrestrial and/or it is phalangeal is not incorrect. sent21: if there are sidereal things the archespore is terrestrial but it is not phalangeal. sent22: the trochlear is a Michener. sent23: if something does regenerate that it is sidereal and it does not varnish cryophobia is not correct. sent24: that the couch is sidereal is correct. sent25: the fact that the fact that something is terrestrial but it is not phalangeal is correct is not true if that it does ignore pseudophloem is not incorrect. sent26: the crystallite is not a kind of a Michener if the cere is a talkie.
sent19 -> int1: if the fact that the archespore is a admirability or it is not a graphic or both is right that it does ignore pseudophloem is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archespore is a kind of a admirability or it is not graphic or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the archespore does ignore pseudophloem.; sent25 -> int3: that that the archespore is terrestrial but it is not phalangeal is incorrect is not false if it ignores pseudophloem.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the archespore is terrestrial and is not phalangeal is incorrect.; sent24 -> int5: there are sidereal things.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the archespore is terrestrial thing that is not phalangeal.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the archespore is a kind of a admirability and/or it is not a graphic is not wrong does not hold.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the hemstitch is not a talkie.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the fact that the cere is not a kind of a talkie and it is not a sugarloaf is false.;
either the trochlear is not a kind of a Michener or it does not poach or both.
sent23 -> int11: if the membrane regenerates then that it is not non-sidereal and it does not varnish cryophobia is not true.; sent15 & sent10 -> int12: the membrane does not powderize.; sent6 & int12 -> int13: the membrane is a kind of regenerate thing that is idiopathic.; int13 -> int14: the membrane regenerates.; int11 & int14 -> int15: that the membrane is sidereal thing that does not varnish cryophobia is false.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that the fact that it is sidereal and it does not varnish cryophobia is wrong.; int16 & sent13 -> int17: the finback is not sidereal.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is not sidereal.; int18 & sent2 -> int19: the couch is a sugarloaf that is not a talkie.; int19 -> int20: the couch is not a talkie.; sent20 & int20 -> int21: the crystallite is terrestrial or it is phalangeal or both.; int21 & sent3 & sent16 -> int22: the cere is phalangeal.; sent18 & int22 -> int23: the fact that the cere is a Michener and does not ignore pseudophloem is not right.; int23 -> int24: there exists something such that that it is a Michener and does not ignore pseudophloem does not hold.; int24 & sent4 -> int25: the hemstitch is not a kind of a Michener.; int25 -> int26: the fact that there is something such that it is not a Michener hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the trochlear either is not a kind of a Michener or does not poach or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the crystallite is not a kind of a Michener and/or it is not a sugarloaf does not hold if that the cere is not a Michener is not false hold. sent2: if there is something such that it is not sidereal the couch is a sugarloaf and is not a kind of a talkie. sent3: the cere is phalangeal if the fact that the crystallite is terrestrial is correct. sent4: the hemstitch is not a Michener if there is something such that the fact that it is a Michener and does not ignore pseudophloem is not right. sent5: the fact that the trochlear is a Michener and is a admirability is not right. sent6: the membrane is regenerate and it is not non-idiopathic if the fact that it does not powderize is right. sent7: if the crystallite is not a Michener the fact that the trochlear either is not a Michener or does not poach or both is not true. sent8: the trochlear is a Michener and/or it is a talkie. sent9: if something ignores pseudophloem then that that it is terrestrial and is phalangeal is not false does not hold. sent10: the fact that the membrane is both a tete-a-tete and not an amelioration is false. sent11: if the hemstitch is not a talkie the fact that the cere is both not a talkie and not a sugarloaf is not correct. sent12: if the archespore is not graphic then it does ignore pseudophloem. sent13: the finback is not sidereal if there is something such that that it is sidereal thing that does not varnish cryophobia is not right. sent14: the hemstitch is not a talkie if that either the archespore is a admirability or it is not a kind of a graphic or both does not hold. sent15: the membrane does not powderize if that it is a tete-a-tete and it is not an amelioration is not true. sent16: if the crystallite is phalangeal then the cere is phalangeal. sent17: if the cere is a sugarloaf the fact that the fact that it is a admirability and it is phalangeal is correct does not hold. sent18: that the cere is a Michener that does not ignore pseudophloem does not hold if it is phalangeal. sent19: something ignores pseudophloem if it is a admirability and/or it is not a kind of a graphic. sent20: the fact that if the couch is not a talkie then the crystallite is terrestrial and/or it is phalangeal is not incorrect. sent21: if there are sidereal things the archespore is terrestrial but it is not phalangeal. sent22: the trochlear is a Michener. sent23: if something does regenerate that it is sidereal and it does not varnish cryophobia is not correct. sent24: that the couch is sidereal is correct. sent25: the fact that the fact that something is terrestrial but it is not phalangeal is correct is not true if that it does ignore pseudophloem is not incorrect. sent26: the crystallite is not a kind of a Michener if the cere is a talkie. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: if the fact that the archespore is a admirability or it is not a graphic or both is right that it does ignore pseudophloem is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archespore is a kind of a admirability or it is not graphic or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the archespore does ignore pseudophloem.; sent25 -> int3: that that the archespore is terrestrial but it is not phalangeal is incorrect is not false if it ignores pseudophloem.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the archespore is terrestrial and is not phalangeal is incorrect.; sent24 -> int5: there are sidereal things.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the archespore is terrestrial thing that is not phalangeal.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the archespore is a kind of a admirability and/or it is not a graphic is not wrong does not hold.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the hemstitch is not a talkie.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the fact that the cere is not a kind of a talkie and it is not a sugarloaf is false.; __UNKNOWN__