the aerospace is a kind of a Stilwell and does not scourge hydrate.
sent1: if something does not scourge dipole then that it is a kind of a Stilwell that does not scourge hydrate is false. sent2: the fricandeau is scalic but it is not a streamer if something does not scourge dipole. sent3: if the eusporangium is not a kind of a Sunday then the fricandeau is not a Sunday. sent4: if there is something such that it is eutrophic and it does not purify documentary then the fricandeau does not scourge dipole. sent5: if something either does not scourge dipole or is not a kind of a deforestation or both then it is a Sunday. sent6: the ringer is a kind of a exorcism that purifies lepidopterology if the skidpan is not allelic. sent7: there exists something such that that it is nonreflective and mecopterous is false. sent8: the aerospace is not a exorcism if that the eusporangium does not scourge hydrate but it is a exorcism is wrong. sent9: that the fact that something is a kind of a Mugwump and it is not non-allelic is not correct if it is not mecopterous is right. sent10: the oxytocin is a kind of a antediluvian and/or is a kind of a Sunday if there is something such that it is a kind of a antediluvian. sent11: if the fact that the sharkskin is both a Mugwump and allelic is wrong then the skidpan is not allelic. sent12: something does not scourge dipole if that it is a kind of a deforestation and it is not a Sunday is not right. sent13: something is antediluvian if it is a kind of a exorcism. sent14: if the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is nonreflective thing that is mecopterous does not hold hold the sharkskin is not mecopterous. sent15: something is not non-eutrophic but it does not purify documentary. sent16: if the fricandeau is a kind of a exorcism then the aerospace is a Stilwell and does not scourge hydrate. sent17: the aerospace is a deforestation and does not scourge dipole if the fricandeau is not a Sunday.
sent15 & sent4 -> int1: the fricandeau does not scourge dipole.; int1 -> int2: the fricandeau does not scourge dipole and/or it is not a kind of a deforestation.; sent5 -> int3: the fricandeau is a Sunday if it does not scourge dipole and/or it is not a deforestation.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fricandeau is a Sunday.;
the fact that the aerospace is a kind of a Stilwell but it does not scourge hydrate is incorrect.
sent1 -> int5: if the aerospace does not scourge dipole that it is a Stilwell and it does not scourge hydrate does not hold.; sent13 -> int6: the ringer is a kind of a antediluvian if it is a kind of a exorcism.; sent9 -> int7: if the sharkskin is not mecopterous that it is a Mugwump and it is allelic is not correct.; sent7 & sent14 -> int8: the sharkskin is not mecopterous.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the sharkskin is a kind of a Mugwump and it is allelic does not hold.; sent11 & int9 -> int10: the skidpan is not allelic.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the ringer is a kind of a exorcism that does purify lepidopterology.; int11 -> int12: the ringer is a exorcism.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the ringer is a antediluvian.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is a antediluvian.; int14 & sent10 -> int15: the oxytocin is a antediluvian or a Sunday or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the aerospace is a kind of a Stilwell and does not scourge hydrate. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not scourge dipole then that it is a kind of a Stilwell that does not scourge hydrate is false. sent2: the fricandeau is scalic but it is not a streamer if something does not scourge dipole. sent3: if the eusporangium is not a kind of a Sunday then the fricandeau is not a Sunday. sent4: if there is something such that it is eutrophic and it does not purify documentary then the fricandeau does not scourge dipole. sent5: if something either does not scourge dipole or is not a kind of a deforestation or both then it is a Sunday. sent6: the ringer is a kind of a exorcism that purifies lepidopterology if the skidpan is not allelic. sent7: there exists something such that that it is nonreflective and mecopterous is false. sent8: the aerospace is not a exorcism if that the eusporangium does not scourge hydrate but it is a exorcism is wrong. sent9: that the fact that something is a kind of a Mugwump and it is not non-allelic is not correct if it is not mecopterous is right. sent10: the oxytocin is a kind of a antediluvian and/or is a kind of a Sunday if there is something such that it is a kind of a antediluvian. sent11: if the fact that the sharkskin is both a Mugwump and allelic is wrong then the skidpan is not allelic. sent12: something does not scourge dipole if that it is a kind of a deforestation and it is not a Sunday is not right. sent13: something is antediluvian if it is a kind of a exorcism. sent14: if the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is nonreflective thing that is mecopterous does not hold hold the sharkskin is not mecopterous. sent15: something is not non-eutrophic but it does not purify documentary. sent16: if the fricandeau is a kind of a exorcism then the aerospace is a Stilwell and does not scourge hydrate. sent17: the aerospace is a deforestation and does not scourge dipole if the fricandeau is not a Sunday. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent4 -> int1: the fricandeau does not scourge dipole.; int1 -> int2: the fricandeau does not scourge dipole and/or it is not a kind of a deforestation.; sent5 -> int3: the fricandeau is a Sunday if it does not scourge dipole and/or it is not a deforestation.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fricandeau is a Sunday.; __UNKNOWN__