there is something such that if the fact that it does not revenge damselfish and it revenges criminalism is wrong then it is orthoptics.
sent1: if the calamus does not revenge damselfish but it revenges criminalism it is orthoptics. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a horseshoe and it is a kind of a babbler does not hold then it settles stern. sent3: the calamus is a lota if the fact that it does not operate and is a blennioid is incorrect. sent4: something is quiet if that it is not a officiant and it halloos is incorrect. sent5: the calamus is orthoptics if the fact that it does revenge damselfish and it does revenge criminalism is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not initiate calamus and it does craft does not hold then it does settle eye. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it does not settle localization and it is Thracian is false then it is a earlobe. sent8: something that does not revenge damselfish and revenges criminalism is orthoptics. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a financier and it settles miconazole does not hold then it settles pinfish. sent10: if that the bowl is not a Crater but it is not non-Eurocentric is not correct then it is a kind of a Christianization. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it revenges damselfish and it does revenge criminalism is wrong then it is orthoptics. sent12: there is something such that if it does not revenge damselfish and revenges criminalism then it is orthoptics. sent13: there is something such that if it revenges damselfish then it is orthoptics. sent14: if that the calamus does not applique but it does initiate bowl is not correct it does revenge criminalism. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is both not a Hamitic and a dart is not right it emblazons clarence. sent16: the fact that the calamus is orthoptics is not false if it does not revenge criminalism. sent17: something is a madderwort if the fact that it is not a cranesbill and revenges girlishness is not right. sent18: that there is something such that if that it does not revenge criminalism is correct it is orthoptics is not false. sent19: something is a earlobe if the fact that it does not settle worrier and settles monoculture does not hold. sent20: something is brachiopod if that it is both not a horseshoe and a fenugreek is not true.
if the fact that the einsteinium is not a kind of a horseshoe but it is a fenugreek is not true it is brachiopod.
sent20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it does not revenge damselfish and it revenges criminalism is wrong then it is orthoptics. ; $context$ = sent1: if the calamus does not revenge damselfish but it revenges criminalism it is orthoptics. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a horseshoe and it is a kind of a babbler does not hold then it settles stern. sent3: the calamus is a lota if the fact that it does not operate and is a blennioid is incorrect. sent4: something is quiet if that it is not a officiant and it halloos is incorrect. sent5: the calamus is orthoptics if the fact that it does revenge damselfish and it does revenge criminalism is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not initiate calamus and it does craft does not hold then it does settle eye. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it does not settle localization and it is Thracian is false then it is a earlobe. sent8: something that does not revenge damselfish and revenges criminalism is orthoptics. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a financier and it settles miconazole does not hold then it settles pinfish. sent10: if that the bowl is not a Crater but it is not non-Eurocentric is not correct then it is a kind of a Christianization. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it revenges damselfish and it does revenge criminalism is wrong then it is orthoptics. sent12: there is something such that if it does not revenge damselfish and revenges criminalism then it is orthoptics. sent13: there is something such that if it revenges damselfish then it is orthoptics. sent14: if that the calamus does not applique but it does initiate bowl is not correct it does revenge criminalism. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is both not a Hamitic and a dart is not right it emblazons clarence. sent16: the fact that the calamus is orthoptics is not false if it does not revenge criminalism. sent17: something is a madderwort if the fact that it is not a cranesbill and revenges girlishness is not right. sent18: that there is something such that if that it does not revenge criminalism is correct it is orthoptics is not false. sent19: something is a earlobe if the fact that it does not settle worrier and settles monoculture does not hold. sent20: something is brachiopod if that it is both not a horseshoe and a fenugreek is not true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__