the terrine is a horsecloth.
sent1: something is a disinformation that is not a satyr. sent2: everything is not a satyr. sent3: the fact that the redeposition is a kind of a horsecloth and does not strangulate echolocation is false. sent4: the redeposition strangulates echolocation and it is a disinformation. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a patron and does not resist rouleau does not hold then the watchman is not a kind of a satyr. sent6: if the salter is a nominal that the watchman strangulates echolocation and is not a kind of a satyr is not true. sent7: there exists something such that that it is a nominal and it is a horsecloth is not correct. sent8: if the salter is a horsecloth then the fact that the terrine does work and it is nominal is not correct. sent9: the terrine is not a horsecloth if there is something such that the fact that it is a work and it is not a satyr is wrong. sent10: the terrine is a kind of a horsecloth and it strangulates echolocation if the redeposition is not a disinformation. sent11: something is a work if that it does strangulate echolocation and is not a kind of a work is false. sent12: the fact that the salter does not deserve franklin is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a Ull. sent13: the salter schools terrine. sent14: that the salter is a kind of a work but it is not a satyr is not true if the watchman is nominal. sent15: the fact that the salter is more but it does not listen is not true. sent16: if that the redeposition is a kind of a satyr is not wrong then it is more. sent17: something that is more but not a nominal is not a disinformation. sent18: if something is a satyr the salter is not a disinformation. sent19: that the salter is more a work is wrong. sent20: if something does strangulate echolocation then it is more. sent21: the watchman is a nominal if there is something such that it is more. sent22: that something does strangulate echolocation but it is not a work is wrong if the fact that it is a disinformation is false.
sent4 -> int1: the redeposition does strangulate echolocation.; sent20 -> int2: that if the redeposition strangulates echolocation the redeposition is more is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the redeposition is more.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is more.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: that the watchman is a nominal is true.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the salter is a work but not a satyr is incorrect.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a work and it is not a satyr is false.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the terrine is a kind of a horsecloth is right.
$hypothesis$ = the terrine is a horsecloth. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a disinformation that is not a satyr. sent2: everything is not a satyr. sent3: the fact that the redeposition is a kind of a horsecloth and does not strangulate echolocation is false. sent4: the redeposition strangulates echolocation and it is a disinformation. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a patron and does not resist rouleau does not hold then the watchman is not a kind of a satyr. sent6: if the salter is a nominal that the watchman strangulates echolocation and is not a kind of a satyr is not true. sent7: there exists something such that that it is a nominal and it is a horsecloth is not correct. sent8: if the salter is a horsecloth then the fact that the terrine does work and it is nominal is not correct. sent9: the terrine is not a horsecloth if there is something such that the fact that it is a work and it is not a satyr is wrong. sent10: the terrine is a kind of a horsecloth and it strangulates echolocation if the redeposition is not a disinformation. sent11: something is a work if that it does strangulate echolocation and is not a kind of a work is false. sent12: the fact that the salter does not deserve franklin is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a Ull. sent13: the salter schools terrine. sent14: that the salter is a kind of a work but it is not a satyr is not true if the watchman is nominal. sent15: the fact that the salter is more but it does not listen is not true. sent16: if that the redeposition is a kind of a satyr is not wrong then it is more. sent17: something that is more but not a nominal is not a disinformation. sent18: if something is a satyr the salter is not a disinformation. sent19: that the salter is more a work is wrong. sent20: if something does strangulate echolocation then it is more. sent21: the watchman is a nominal if there is something such that it is more. sent22: that something does strangulate echolocation but it is not a work is wrong if the fact that it is a disinformation is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the redeposition does strangulate echolocation.; sent20 -> int2: that if the redeposition strangulates echolocation the redeposition is more is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the redeposition is more.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is more.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: that the watchman is a nominal is true.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the salter is a work but not a satyr is incorrect.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a work and it is not a satyr is false.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__