the chylomicron is not a regency.
sent1: the baas is not inconspicuous if a enolic thing is not prophetic. sent2: the baas is not transeunt if it is not bauxitic. sent3: the baas is not transeunt but it is enolic if it is not a regency. sent4: if the elater is inconspicuous the chylomicron is not enolic. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not sobering and not a hypercatalectic is false that the elater is sobering is true. sent6: the baas is a kind of non-transeunt thing that is a regency. sent7: that the East-sider is not a cluck is not incorrect if the skua is a cluck. sent8: the baas is not bauxitic. sent9: that something is not bauxitic if it is not a regency is correct. sent10: the adulterator is soluble but it is not a horsepond if it is not a kind of a Saale. sent11: if there exists something such that it is soluble and it is not a kind of a horsepond that the honeycreeper does not honey Nike is correct. sent12: if the baas is not bauxitic then it is not transeunt and it does resettle osteopathy. sent13: that the poolroom is a kind of non-sobering thing that is not hypercatalectic is not true if there is something such that it does not honey Nike. sent14: something is a kind of enolic thing that is unprophetic if it is sobering. sent15: if the baas is transeunt and does resettle osteopathy the elater is inconspicuous. sent16: the skua is a cluck. sent17: if the baas is not transeunt but it resettles osteopathy then the elater is not conspicuous. sent18: if the East-sider is not a kind of a cluck then it is not a kind of a Saale and it is not a kind of an electromagnet. sent19: the baas is not transeunt. sent20: if the East-sider is not a Saale and not an electromagnet the adulterator is not a Saale. sent21: the baas is a regency.
sent12 & sent8 -> int1: the baas is a kind of non-transeunt thing that resettles osteopathy.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the elater is inconspicuous.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the chylomicron is not enolic.;
the chylomicron is a regency.
sent14 -> int4: the elater is enolic and unprophetic if it sobers.; sent7 & sent16 -> int5: the East-sider is not a cluck.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the East-sider is not a Saale and is not a kind of an electromagnet.; sent20 & int6 -> int7: the adulterator is not a kind of a Saale.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the adulterator is both not insoluble and not a horsepond.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is soluble and not a horsepond.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the honeycreeper does not honey Nike.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it does not honey Nike.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: the fact that the poolroom is not sobering and is not hypercatalectic does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not sober and it is not a kind of a hypercatalectic is not right.; int13 & sent5 -> int14: the elater is not non-sobering.; int4 & int14 -> int15: the elater is enolic but it is not prophetic.; int15 -> int16: there are enolic and unprophetic things.; int16 & sent1 -> int17: the baas is not inconspicuous.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not inconspicuous is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the chylomicron is not a regency. ; $context$ = sent1: the baas is not inconspicuous if a enolic thing is not prophetic. sent2: the baas is not transeunt if it is not bauxitic. sent3: the baas is not transeunt but it is enolic if it is not a regency. sent4: if the elater is inconspicuous the chylomicron is not enolic. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not sobering and not a hypercatalectic is false that the elater is sobering is true. sent6: the baas is a kind of non-transeunt thing that is a regency. sent7: that the East-sider is not a cluck is not incorrect if the skua is a cluck. sent8: the baas is not bauxitic. sent9: that something is not bauxitic if it is not a regency is correct. sent10: the adulterator is soluble but it is not a horsepond if it is not a kind of a Saale. sent11: if there exists something such that it is soluble and it is not a kind of a horsepond that the honeycreeper does not honey Nike is correct. sent12: if the baas is not bauxitic then it is not transeunt and it does resettle osteopathy. sent13: that the poolroom is a kind of non-sobering thing that is not hypercatalectic is not true if there is something such that it does not honey Nike. sent14: something is a kind of enolic thing that is unprophetic if it is sobering. sent15: if the baas is transeunt and does resettle osteopathy the elater is inconspicuous. sent16: the skua is a cluck. sent17: if the baas is not transeunt but it resettles osteopathy then the elater is not conspicuous. sent18: if the East-sider is not a kind of a cluck then it is not a kind of a Saale and it is not a kind of an electromagnet. sent19: the baas is not transeunt. sent20: if the East-sider is not a Saale and not an electromagnet the adulterator is not a Saale. sent21: the baas is a regency. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent8 -> int1: the baas is a kind of non-transeunt thing that resettles osteopathy.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the elater is inconspicuous.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the chylomicron is not enolic.; __UNKNOWN__