the fact that the advocate is anorthitic is not incorrect.
sent1: the viscose is dramatic if the buckram is dramatic. sent2: the novitiate is dramatic. sent3: the advocate is not anorthitic if there is something such that it does not excel stridulation and it is not a lusterware. sent4: if the fact that the whistler is a touchdown hold then it does not excel stridulation and is not a lusterware. sent5: the viscose excels cottontail if the buckram is a pitching. sent6: if that the novitiate is not a kind of an item or it is a kind of a stiffness or both is incorrect then the whistler is not a kind of an item. sent7: something is not a semicentennial. sent8: that the buckram is dramatic hold if there is something such that it does not excel cottontail or it is a pitching or both. sent9: if something excels Pipistrellus the fact that it is not an item and/or it is a kind of a stiffness does not hold. sent10: something does not excel obscurantism and is not a stockyard if it is not an item. sent11: if the viscose is dramatic then the novitiate excels Pipistrellus. sent12: that the whistler is not a touchdown but it excels obscurantism does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a stockyard. sent13: the whistler does not excel stridulation if it is a touchdown. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a touchdown and it excels obscurantism is not right the moonstone is not anorthitic. sent15: the echovirus does not excel cottontail and/or does pitch. sent16: the whistler does not excel stridulation. sent17: if something is a kind of a touchdown it is anorthitic. sent18: if something that is a stiffness is a kind of an item then the advocate is not a kind of a stockyard. sent19: the whistler is a kind of a touchdown. sent20: the novitiate excels Pipistrellus if the viscose does excel cottontail. sent21: everything pitches. sent22: if that something is dramatic is not false then it is a kind of an item.
sent4 & sent19 -> int1: the whistler does not excel stridulation and is not a kind of a lusterware.; int1 -> int2: something does not excel stridulation and it is not a lusterware.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the moonstone is not anorthitic.
sent21 -> int3: that the buckram pitches is not wrong.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the viscose excels cottontail.; sent20 & int4 -> int5: the novitiate excels Pipistrellus.; sent22 -> int6: if the novitiate is dramatic it is a kind of an item.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the novitiate is an item.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the advocate is anorthitic is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the viscose is dramatic if the buckram is dramatic. sent2: the novitiate is dramatic. sent3: the advocate is not anorthitic if there is something such that it does not excel stridulation and it is not a lusterware. sent4: if the fact that the whistler is a touchdown hold then it does not excel stridulation and is not a lusterware. sent5: the viscose excels cottontail if the buckram is a pitching. sent6: if that the novitiate is not a kind of an item or it is a kind of a stiffness or both is incorrect then the whistler is not a kind of an item. sent7: something is not a semicentennial. sent8: that the buckram is dramatic hold if there is something such that it does not excel cottontail or it is a pitching or both. sent9: if something excels Pipistrellus the fact that it is not an item and/or it is a kind of a stiffness does not hold. sent10: something does not excel obscurantism and is not a stockyard if it is not an item. sent11: if the viscose is dramatic then the novitiate excels Pipistrellus. sent12: that the whistler is not a touchdown but it excels obscurantism does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a stockyard. sent13: the whistler does not excel stridulation if it is a touchdown. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a touchdown and it excels obscurantism is not right the moonstone is not anorthitic. sent15: the echovirus does not excel cottontail and/or does pitch. sent16: the whistler does not excel stridulation. sent17: if something is a kind of a touchdown it is anorthitic. sent18: if something that is a stiffness is a kind of an item then the advocate is not a kind of a stockyard. sent19: the whistler is a kind of a touchdown. sent20: the novitiate excels Pipistrellus if the viscose does excel cottontail. sent21: everything pitches. sent22: if that something is dramatic is not false then it is a kind of an item. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent19 -> int1: the whistler does not excel stridulation and is not a kind of a lusterware.; int1 -> int2: something does not excel stridulation and it is not a lusterware.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__