the headmastership does not occur and the leptosporangiateness does not occur.
sent1: that the headmastership does not occur and the leptosporangiateness happens is wrong if the fact that the wobbling Baptist does not occur is correct. sent2: that the lapidary happens and the clouding skiing does not occur is wrong. sent3: if that the thrashing does not occur and the androgynousness does not occur is wrong the fact that the wobbling compass does not occur is correct. sent4: if the fact that the lapidary does not occur and the clouding skiing does not occur does not hold then the wobbling Baptist does not occur. sent5: the fact that the lapidariness does not occur and the clouding skiing happens is incorrect. sent6: that the headmastership and the non-leptosporangiateness happens is wrong. sent7: that the headmastership does not occur but the leptosporangiateness happens is not correct. sent8: if the wobbling Baptist does not occur then that the headmastership does not occur and the leptosporangiateness does not occur is not true. sent9: the fact that the Epiphany does not occur and the vandalism does not occur is not correct if the independentness does not occur. sent10: the clouding skiing occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lapidary does not occur and the clouding skiing does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the clouding skiing does not occur is not incorrect.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the lapidariness does not occur and the clouding skiing does not occur is wrong.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wobbling Baptist does not occur is right.; sent8 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the headmastership does not occur and the leptosporangiateness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the headmastership does not occur and the leptosporangiateness happens is wrong if the fact that the wobbling Baptist does not occur is correct. sent2: that the lapidary happens and the clouding skiing does not occur is wrong. sent3: if that the thrashing does not occur and the androgynousness does not occur is wrong the fact that the wobbling compass does not occur is correct. sent4: if the fact that the lapidary does not occur and the clouding skiing does not occur does not hold then the wobbling Baptist does not occur. sent5: the fact that the lapidariness does not occur and the clouding skiing happens is incorrect. sent6: that the headmastership and the non-leptosporangiateness happens is wrong. sent7: that the headmastership does not occur but the leptosporangiateness happens is not correct. sent8: if the wobbling Baptist does not occur then that the headmastership does not occur and the leptosporangiateness does not occur is not true. sent9: the fact that the Epiphany does not occur and the vandalism does not occur is not correct if the independentness does not occur. sent10: the clouding skiing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lapidary does not occur and the clouding skiing does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the clouding skiing does not occur is not incorrect.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the lapidariness does not occur and the clouding skiing does not occur is wrong.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wobbling Baptist does not occur is right.; sent8 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__