that the framboise belts but it does not resuscitate is not true.
sent1: if the framboise is a prothorax but it is not a belt it is not a semifinalist. sent2: the soundman does not slice convention. sent3: the framboise is not a immateriality if it does belt and does not resuscitate. sent4: the fact that the aragonite slices convention is not incorrect if the keyboardist is bryophytic. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does fumble apocalypse is true then either the keyboardist is a immateriality or it is bryophytic or both. sent6: something belts if it anticipates and is not totalitarian. sent7: if something does slice convention then it is not a immateriality and is bryophytic. sent8: everything is palatable. sent9: the specifier fumbles apocalypse and is a kind of a Gasterophilus. sent10: the scholar is bryophytic if the framboise is not a immateriality but it is bryophytic. sent11: the framboise does not slice convention and it is not bryophytic. sent12: the framboise does not resuscitate if the aragonite does slice convention. sent13: the framboise is a immateriality if it does not slice convention and is not bryophytic. sent14: something anticipates and is not a totalitarian if it is palatable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the framboise is a belt but it does not resuscitate.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the framboise is not a kind of a immateriality.; sent13 & sent11 -> int2: the framboise is a immateriality.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the scholar is bryophytic.
sent7 -> int4: if the fact that the framboise does slice convention hold then it is both not a immateriality and bryophytic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the framboise belts but it does not resuscitate is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the framboise is a prothorax but it is not a belt it is not a semifinalist. sent2: the soundman does not slice convention. sent3: the framboise is not a immateriality if it does belt and does not resuscitate. sent4: the fact that the aragonite slices convention is not incorrect if the keyboardist is bryophytic. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does fumble apocalypse is true then either the keyboardist is a immateriality or it is bryophytic or both. sent6: something belts if it anticipates and is not totalitarian. sent7: if something does slice convention then it is not a immateriality and is bryophytic. sent8: everything is palatable. sent9: the specifier fumbles apocalypse and is a kind of a Gasterophilus. sent10: the scholar is bryophytic if the framboise is not a immateriality but it is bryophytic. sent11: the framboise does not slice convention and it is not bryophytic. sent12: the framboise does not resuscitate if the aragonite does slice convention. sent13: the framboise is a immateriality if it does not slice convention and is not bryophytic. sent14: something anticipates and is not a totalitarian if it is palatable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the framboise is a belt but it does not resuscitate.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the framboise is not a kind of a immateriality.; sent13 & sent11 -> int2: the framboise is a immateriality.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__