the artiste is not unpresidential but it does impact shoulder.
sent1: the centrifuge impacts shoulder if there exists something such that it is healthful and it is not unsarcastic. sent2: the shaping excuses posthouse if the rejuvenation is a fluoride but it is not a upholder. sent3: if something is not a parachute then it is not unpresidential. sent4: the shaping does excuse posthouse if the rejuvenation is a kind of a fluoride and it is a kind of a upholder. sent5: something is a parachute if it does not excuse posthouse. sent6: the artiste does excuse posthouse if the shaping impacts shoulder and is not a kind of a upholder. sent7: the artiste is not unpresidential. sent8: the artiste is a kind of a fluoride. sent9: that the artiste is not unpresidential hold if it is not a parachute. sent10: the posthouse is a kind of healthful thing that is not unsarcastic if the tammy does impact plaque. sent11: if the gingerol audits the tammy impacts plaque. sent12: if the fact that that the shaping is not a parachute but a wheelchair does not hold hold then it does not excuse posthouse. sent13: something is not unpresidential but it impacts shoulder if it is not a kind of a parachute. sent14: if the shaping does excuse posthouse then that the fact that the artiste does not excuse posthouse and is a wheelchair is incorrect is correct. sent15: the artiste is not a kind of a parachute if the fact that it is not a wheelchair hold. sent16: if the rejuvenation does not excuse posthouse it is not a upholder and it is a fluoride. sent17: that the rejuvenation is a fluoride but it is not a kind of a upholder hold. sent18: the gingerol is an audit and/or is uncousinly. sent19: if that the artiste does not excuse posthouse and is a wheelchair is wrong then it is not a parachute. sent20: if something is not a parachute then the fact that it does not excuse posthouse and is a storybook is false. sent21: if the gingerol is uncousinly the tammy does impact plaque. sent22: the rejuvenation is not a upholder.
sent2 & sent17 -> int1: that the shaping does excuse posthouse is not incorrect.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: that the artiste does not excuse posthouse and is a wheelchair is false.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the artiste is not a kind of a parachute.; sent13 -> int4: if the artiste is not a kind of a parachute then it is non-unpresidential thing that impacts shoulder.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the artiste is not unpresidential and does impact shoulder is incorrect.
sent5 -> int5: the rejuvenation is a parachute if it does not excuse posthouse.;
$hypothesis$ = the artiste is not unpresidential but it does impact shoulder. ; $context$ = sent1: the centrifuge impacts shoulder if there exists something such that it is healthful and it is not unsarcastic. sent2: the shaping excuses posthouse if the rejuvenation is a fluoride but it is not a upholder. sent3: if something is not a parachute then it is not unpresidential. sent4: the shaping does excuse posthouse if the rejuvenation is a kind of a fluoride and it is a kind of a upholder. sent5: something is a parachute if it does not excuse posthouse. sent6: the artiste does excuse posthouse if the shaping impacts shoulder and is not a kind of a upholder. sent7: the artiste is not unpresidential. sent8: the artiste is a kind of a fluoride. sent9: that the artiste is not unpresidential hold if it is not a parachute. sent10: the posthouse is a kind of healthful thing that is not unsarcastic if the tammy does impact plaque. sent11: if the gingerol audits the tammy impacts plaque. sent12: if the fact that that the shaping is not a parachute but a wheelchair does not hold hold then it does not excuse posthouse. sent13: something is not unpresidential but it impacts shoulder if it is not a kind of a parachute. sent14: if the shaping does excuse posthouse then that the fact that the artiste does not excuse posthouse and is a wheelchair is incorrect is correct. sent15: the artiste is not a kind of a parachute if the fact that it is not a wheelchair hold. sent16: if the rejuvenation does not excuse posthouse it is not a upholder and it is a fluoride. sent17: that the rejuvenation is a fluoride but it is not a kind of a upholder hold. sent18: the gingerol is an audit and/or is uncousinly. sent19: if that the artiste does not excuse posthouse and is a wheelchair is wrong then it is not a parachute. sent20: if something is not a parachute then the fact that it does not excuse posthouse and is a storybook is false. sent21: if the gingerol is uncousinly the tammy does impact plaque. sent22: the rejuvenation is not a upholder. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent17 -> int1: that the shaping does excuse posthouse is not incorrect.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: that the artiste does not excuse posthouse and is a wheelchair is false.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the artiste is not a kind of a parachute.; sent13 -> int4: if the artiste is not a kind of a parachute then it is non-unpresidential thing that impacts shoulder.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__