the fact that the saturniid is not biochemical but it is generative is incorrect.
sent1: the saturniid does outstare bitternut. sent2: if the saturniid is not generative then that the endocardium is generative thing that does disco does not hold. sent3: the endocardium is a disco. sent4: that the saturniid is not biochemical but it is generative is not true if the endocardium is not biochemical. sent5: the activity is not biochemical. sent6: the fact that something is non-substantive is true if the fact that it is a Lobachevsky and it is non-phalangeal does not hold. sent7: that the saturniid is a kind of biochemical thing that is a disco does not hold. sent8: the fact that the SALT is not a kind of an award but it restrains tired is false. sent9: if there is something such that it is biochemical the saturniid is a disco. sent10: the endocardium is generative if there exists something such that it is biochemical. sent11: the brokerage is not biochemical. sent12: that the saturniid is biochemical and it is generative is incorrect if the endocardium is biochemical. sent13: there exists something such that it is tubal. sent14: the fact that the saturniid is not non-biochemical and it is generative is not correct. sent15: if the endocardium does not restrain tired then that that it is a Lobachevsky and it is not phalangeal hold is not true. sent16: something either does disco or is tubal or both if the fact that it is not a kind of a substantive is correct. sent17: the saturniid is not tubal. sent18: something is both not biochemical and generative if it is tubal. sent19: if there is something such that it is tubal the endocardium is a disco.
the saturniid is not biochemical and is generative.
sent18 -> int1: the saturniid is not biochemical and is generative if it is tubal.; sent16 -> int2: if the endocardium is not a substantive it is a disco and/or it is tubal.; sent6 -> int3: the endocardium is not a kind of a substantive if that it is a kind of a Lobachevsky that is not phalangeal is false.; sent8 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does not award and it does restrain tired does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the saturniid is not biochemical but it is generative is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the saturniid does outstare bitternut. sent2: if the saturniid is not generative then that the endocardium is generative thing that does disco does not hold. sent3: the endocardium is a disco. sent4: that the saturniid is not biochemical but it is generative is not true if the endocardium is not biochemical. sent5: the activity is not biochemical. sent6: the fact that something is non-substantive is true if the fact that it is a Lobachevsky and it is non-phalangeal does not hold. sent7: that the saturniid is a kind of biochemical thing that is a disco does not hold. sent8: the fact that the SALT is not a kind of an award but it restrains tired is false. sent9: if there is something such that it is biochemical the saturniid is a disco. sent10: the endocardium is generative if there exists something such that it is biochemical. sent11: the brokerage is not biochemical. sent12: that the saturniid is biochemical and it is generative is incorrect if the endocardium is biochemical. sent13: there exists something such that it is tubal. sent14: the fact that the saturniid is not non-biochemical and it is generative is not correct. sent15: if the endocardium does not restrain tired then that that it is a Lobachevsky and it is not phalangeal hold is not true. sent16: something either does disco or is tubal or both if the fact that it is not a kind of a substantive is correct. sent17: the saturniid is not tubal. sent18: something is both not biochemical and generative if it is tubal. sent19: if there is something such that it is tubal the endocardium is a disco. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__