the fact that the palanquin acts tuft does not hold.
sent1: if that the plain is not a Pseudococcidae and it does not batch is incorrect it is not a kind of a pit. sent2: the graphic is not isomorphous if that it is not a wireworm is right. sent3: the traveler is a kind of a lap if it is indecent. sent4: if the palanquin is not a pit that it is indecent or is not a kind of a lap or both is not correct. sent5: if a rate does not act tuft the palanquin is not a lap. sent6: the traveler does not lap if that the plain is blastogenetic and it is wheaten is not correct. sent7: the weld is not a kind of a Pseudococcidae if that the frankincense is not clement but it is a kind of a Pseudococcidae does not hold. sent8: if something is indecent it does act tuft. sent9: the fact that the plain is blastogenetic and it is wheaten is not correct if the palanquin is not indecent. sent10: that the traveler does not pit is not wrong. sent11: something is wheaten if that it is indecent is not incorrect. sent12: the plain is a kind of a rate that does not act tuft if the traveler does pit. sent13: that the traveler does act tuft and is a pit is wrong. sent14: that the fact that the frankincense is not clement but it is a Pseudococcidae is correct is not true if there exists something such that it is clement. sent15: if the palanquin is blastogenetic then it does act tuft. sent16: if the plain is not clement then that it is not a kind of a Pseudococcidae and it does not batch is wrong. sent17: that the plain acts brag and/or it is not a Cynopterus is not true if it is not lunar. sent18: the fact that the traveler is a wireworm and/or it is not a rate is incorrect if it is not a pit. sent19: if the palanquin is not a kind of a lap then the fact that the pisser is a kind of indecent thing that is a kind of a wireworm is not correct. sent20: if that something is a wireworm and/or it is not a rate is wrong then that it laps is not false. sent21: the silly is clement. sent22: if the plain does not pit it does rate and it is a wireworm. sent23: if that something is indecent a wireworm does not hold it is not a wireworm.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the palanquin is not indecent.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the plain is both blastogenetic and wheaten is wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the traveler does not lap.; sent20 -> int3: if that the traveler is a kind of a wireworm and/or it is not a kind of a rate is not true the fact that it is a lap is not false.; sent18 & sent10 -> int4: that the traveler is a wireworm and/or it is not a rate is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the traveler does lap.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the palanquin is indecent.; sent8 -> int8: if the palanquin is indecent it does act tuft.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the palanquin does not act tuft is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the palanquin acts tuft does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the plain is not a Pseudococcidae and it does not batch is incorrect it is not a kind of a pit. sent2: the graphic is not isomorphous if that it is not a wireworm is right. sent3: the traveler is a kind of a lap if it is indecent. sent4: if the palanquin is not a pit that it is indecent or is not a kind of a lap or both is not correct. sent5: if a rate does not act tuft the palanquin is not a lap. sent6: the traveler does not lap if that the plain is blastogenetic and it is wheaten is not correct. sent7: the weld is not a kind of a Pseudococcidae if that the frankincense is not clement but it is a kind of a Pseudococcidae does not hold. sent8: if something is indecent it does act tuft. sent9: the fact that the plain is blastogenetic and it is wheaten is not correct if the palanquin is not indecent. sent10: that the traveler does not pit is not wrong. sent11: something is wheaten if that it is indecent is not incorrect. sent12: the plain is a kind of a rate that does not act tuft if the traveler does pit. sent13: that the traveler does act tuft and is a pit is wrong. sent14: that the fact that the frankincense is not clement but it is a Pseudococcidae is correct is not true if there exists something such that it is clement. sent15: if the palanquin is blastogenetic then it does act tuft. sent16: if the plain is not clement then that it is not a kind of a Pseudococcidae and it does not batch is wrong. sent17: that the plain acts brag and/or it is not a Cynopterus is not true if it is not lunar. sent18: the fact that the traveler is a wireworm and/or it is not a rate is incorrect if it is not a pit. sent19: if the palanquin is not a kind of a lap then the fact that the pisser is a kind of indecent thing that is a kind of a wireworm is not correct. sent20: if that something is a wireworm and/or it is not a rate is wrong then that it laps is not false. sent21: the silly is clement. sent22: if the plain does not pit it does rate and it is a wireworm. sent23: if that something is indecent a wireworm does not hold it is not a wireworm. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the palanquin is not indecent.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the plain is both blastogenetic and wheaten is wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the traveler does not lap.; sent20 -> int3: if that the traveler is a kind of a wireworm and/or it is not a kind of a rate is not true the fact that it is a lap is not false.; sent18 & sent10 -> int4: that the traveler is a wireworm and/or it is not a rate is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the traveler does lap.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the palanquin is indecent.; sent8 -> int8: if the palanquin is indecent it does act tuft.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__