the impacting neologism does not occur and the impacting Hogmanay does not occur if the fact that the advancing occurs is not correct.
sent1: if the quantification occurs then the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent2: if the branchialness does not occur the impacting neologism but not the impacting Hogmanay occurs. sent3: the heterodyneness occurs. sent4: if the advancing does not occur the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent5: that the ride occurs if the impacting thievishness happens hold. sent6: the shivering curiosa does not occur and the impacting acquisition does not occur if the recession does not occur. sent7: the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent8: the impacting Hogmanay does not occur if the fact that the branchialness does not occur hold. sent9: if the pressing occurs the fact that the advance does not occur but the branchialness occurs is wrong. sent10: the shivering ranching does not occur and the menace does not occur. sent11: if the branchialness happens then the advance happens. sent12: the pressing happens if the fact that the shivering Klimt happens and/or the head does not occur does not hold. sent13: the activating polish does not occur. sent14: if the advance does not occur the impacting neologism happens and the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent15: the impacting neologism happens and the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent16: the fact that the scalar does not occur is true if the fact that the advance does not occur but the branchialness happens is false. sent17: the uninstructiveness does not occur. sent18: the fact that the photicness occurs is true. sent19: the snickersnee happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the branchialness occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the advance occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the advance does not occur is correct.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the branchialness does not occur is right.;
the scalar does not occur and the shutout does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the impacting neologism does not occur and the impacting Hogmanay does not occur if the fact that the advancing occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the quantification occurs then the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent2: if the branchialness does not occur the impacting neologism but not the impacting Hogmanay occurs. sent3: the heterodyneness occurs. sent4: if the advancing does not occur the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent5: that the ride occurs if the impacting thievishness happens hold. sent6: the shivering curiosa does not occur and the impacting acquisition does not occur if the recession does not occur. sent7: the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent8: the impacting Hogmanay does not occur if the fact that the branchialness does not occur hold. sent9: if the pressing occurs the fact that the advance does not occur but the branchialness occurs is wrong. sent10: the shivering ranching does not occur and the menace does not occur. sent11: if the branchialness happens then the advance happens. sent12: the pressing happens if the fact that the shivering Klimt happens and/or the head does not occur does not hold. sent13: the activating polish does not occur. sent14: if the advance does not occur the impacting neologism happens and the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent15: the impacting neologism happens and the impacting Hogmanay does not occur. sent16: the fact that the scalar does not occur is true if the fact that the advance does not occur but the branchialness happens is false. sent17: the uninstructiveness does not occur. sent18: the fact that the photicness occurs is true. sent19: the snickersnee happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the branchialness occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the advance occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the advance does not occur is correct.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the branchialness does not occur is right.; __UNKNOWN__