the impressionist occurs.
sent1: the fact that not the unsuccessfulness but the corollary happens does not hold if the erythropoieticness does not occur. sent2: the LASIK does not occur. sent3: the syndeticness does not occur if that not the swish but the unionizing scorpion occurs does not hold. sent4: either the unionizing scorpion or the swish or both occurs. sent5: the successfulness and/or the carboniferousness prevents that the impressionist does not occur. sent6: if the LASIK happens then the fact that the carboniferousness does not occur but the impressionistness occurs does not hold. sent7: if the swish occurs the corollary happens. sent8: that the corollary occurs and the erythropoieticness occurs causes the successfulness. sent9: the corollary happens if the unionizing scorpion happens.
sent4 & sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the corollary happens.;
the syndeticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the impressionist occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the unsuccessfulness but the corollary happens does not hold if the erythropoieticness does not occur. sent2: the LASIK does not occur. sent3: the syndeticness does not occur if that not the swish but the unionizing scorpion occurs does not hold. sent4: either the unionizing scorpion or the swish or both occurs. sent5: the successfulness and/or the carboniferousness prevents that the impressionist does not occur. sent6: if the LASIK happens then the fact that the carboniferousness does not occur but the impressionistness occurs does not hold. sent7: if the swish occurs the corollary happens. sent8: that the corollary occurs and the erythropoieticness occurs causes the successfulness. sent9: the corollary happens if the unionizing scorpion happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the corollary happens.; __UNKNOWN__