the call-back is a molle.
sent1: if the knight is crude the morceau is not prosodic. sent2: the fact that the apodeme is not a molle and/or it does not prop pullulation is incorrect. sent3: something is a molle if it is a wintergreen. sent4: the call-back is not a kind of a wintergreen if the fact that it is a kind of an orientation and it is aerological is not correct. sent5: the apodeme is a kind of an orientation if that the fact that it is either not a molle or not impermanent or both is not wrong does not hold. sent6: the fact that if the fact that the call-back is not impermanent or the orientation or both is false the call-back is a kind of a wintergreen is not false. sent7: the call-back is an orientation if it is aerological. sent8: the apodeme is not an orientation if the fact that it props pullulation and it is aerological is not true. sent9: if something does resist then it is a Castanospermum. sent10: that the kipper is a Salpidae and it is a fiddlehead does not hold. sent11: the rangpur is an orientation. sent12: the fact that the call-back either is not impermanent or is not a kind of an orientation or both is wrong if the apodeme is not a kind of an orientation. sent13: that the call-back is an orientation is not wrong. sent14: if something is not an orientation that it is isopteran and is a Icelander is wrong. sent15: that something is not a wintergreen hold if that it is not impermanent and/or does not wean villager does not hold. sent16: there is nothing that does prop pullulation and is aerological. sent17: the knight is spiritless and it is crude. sent18: the call-back is an orientation if the apodeme is not an orientation. sent19: the fact that either the apodeme is not a molle or it is not a kind of an orientation or both does not hold if that the call-back is not an orientation hold. sent20: the fact that the morceau is not impermanent and/or it does not wean villager is not correct if it is not prosodic. sent21: if something is calcitic then it is a elver. sent22: the apodeme is not an orientation if it does not prop pullulation.
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the apodeme props pullulation and it is aerological is not true.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the apodeme is not an orientation.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the call-back is either permanent or not an orientation or both does not hold.; sent3 -> int4: if the call-back is a kind of a wintergreen that it is a molle is true.;
the fact that the call-back is not a molle hold.
sent15 -> int5: the morceau is not a wintergreen if the fact that it is not impermanent and/or it does not wean villager is not correct.; sent17 -> int6: the knight is crude.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the morceau is not prosodic.; sent20 & int7 -> int8: that the morceau is not impermanent and/or it does not wean villager is incorrect.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the morceau is not a kind of a wintergreen.; int9 -> int10: something is not a wintergreen.;
$hypothesis$ = the call-back is a molle. ; $context$ = sent1: if the knight is crude the morceau is not prosodic. sent2: the fact that the apodeme is not a molle and/or it does not prop pullulation is incorrect. sent3: something is a molle if it is a wintergreen. sent4: the call-back is not a kind of a wintergreen if the fact that it is a kind of an orientation and it is aerological is not correct. sent5: the apodeme is a kind of an orientation if that the fact that it is either not a molle or not impermanent or both is not wrong does not hold. sent6: the fact that if the fact that the call-back is not impermanent or the orientation or both is false the call-back is a kind of a wintergreen is not false. sent7: the call-back is an orientation if it is aerological. sent8: the apodeme is not an orientation if the fact that it props pullulation and it is aerological is not true. sent9: if something does resist then it is a Castanospermum. sent10: that the kipper is a Salpidae and it is a fiddlehead does not hold. sent11: the rangpur is an orientation. sent12: the fact that the call-back either is not impermanent or is not a kind of an orientation or both is wrong if the apodeme is not a kind of an orientation. sent13: that the call-back is an orientation is not wrong. sent14: if something is not an orientation that it is isopteran and is a Icelander is wrong. sent15: that something is not a wintergreen hold if that it is not impermanent and/or does not wean villager does not hold. sent16: there is nothing that does prop pullulation and is aerological. sent17: the knight is spiritless and it is crude. sent18: the call-back is an orientation if the apodeme is not an orientation. sent19: the fact that either the apodeme is not a molle or it is not a kind of an orientation or both does not hold if that the call-back is not an orientation hold. sent20: the fact that the morceau is not impermanent and/or it does not wean villager is not correct if it is not prosodic. sent21: if something is calcitic then it is a elver. sent22: the apodeme is not an orientation if it does not prop pullulation. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the apodeme props pullulation and it is aerological is not true.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the apodeme is not an orientation.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the call-back is either permanent or not an orientation or both does not hold.; sent3 -> int4: if the call-back is a kind of a wintergreen that it is a molle is true.; __UNKNOWN__