the daggerboard is radiological.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the futon does not piece jonah and it is not aneurysmal is incorrect is not incorrect if the dauber does not scuff legislation. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does not piece jonah and is not aneurysmal is false then the daggerboard is radiological. sent3: if the fact that there exists something such that it is a forties is not incorrect then the dauber scuffs legislation but it is not radiological. sent4: there exists something such that that it does not piece jonah and is aneurysmal is not right. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it does not scuff legislation and it is not aneurysmal is incorrect. sent6: the futon does piece MBA if that something does scuff legislation but it is not radiological hold. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is not a ipsedixitism and it is tomentose is not right then the daggerboard is a forties. sent8: The legislation does not scuff dauber. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does piece jonah and is not aneurysmal is not true. sent10: everything is not a ipsedixitism. sent11: if there exists something such that that that it does not scuff legislation and it is not aneurysmal is not incorrect is false the dauber is radiological. sent12: if there is something such that it is aneurysmal then the daggerboard is radiological. sent13: that the futon does not piece jonah and is aneurysmal does not hold if the dauber does not scuff legislation. sent14: there is something such that it does not piece jonah and is not aneurysmal. sent15: if the dauber is not aneurysmal then that the fact that the futon does not scuff legislation and does not piece jonah is incorrect is right. sent16: that the futon does not piece jonah but it is aneurysmal does not hold. sent17: that if there is something such that the fact that it is not radiological and does not piece jonah is not right the daggerboard scuffs legislation hold. sent18: the dauber does not scuff legislation.
sent1 & sent18 -> int1: that the futon does not piece jonah and is not aneurysmal is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that that it does not piece jonah and it is not aneurysmal is correct is not correct.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the futon pieces MBA.
$hypothesis$ = the daggerboard is radiological. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the futon does not piece jonah and it is not aneurysmal is incorrect is not incorrect if the dauber does not scuff legislation. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does not piece jonah and is not aneurysmal is false then the daggerboard is radiological. sent3: if the fact that there exists something such that it is a forties is not incorrect then the dauber scuffs legislation but it is not radiological. sent4: there exists something such that that it does not piece jonah and is aneurysmal is not right. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it does not scuff legislation and it is not aneurysmal is incorrect. sent6: the futon does piece MBA if that something does scuff legislation but it is not radiological hold. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is not a ipsedixitism and it is tomentose is not right then the daggerboard is a forties. sent8: The legislation does not scuff dauber. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does piece jonah and is not aneurysmal is not true. sent10: everything is not a ipsedixitism. sent11: if there exists something such that that that it does not scuff legislation and it is not aneurysmal is not incorrect is false the dauber is radiological. sent12: if there is something such that it is aneurysmal then the daggerboard is radiological. sent13: that the futon does not piece jonah and is aneurysmal does not hold if the dauber does not scuff legislation. sent14: there is something such that it does not piece jonah and is not aneurysmal. sent15: if the dauber is not aneurysmal then that the fact that the futon does not scuff legislation and does not piece jonah is incorrect is right. sent16: that the futon does not piece jonah but it is aneurysmal does not hold. sent17: that if there is something such that the fact that it is not radiological and does not piece jonah is not right the daggerboard scuffs legislation hold. sent18: the dauber does not scuff legislation. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent18 -> int1: that the futon does not piece jonah and is not aneurysmal is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that that it does not piece jonah and it is not aneurysmal is correct is not correct.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__