the resulting does not occur.
sent1: that the resulting occurs is not true if the reciprocating puncture does not occur. sent2: the cession happens if the fact that the passerine happens and the cession does not occur is not true. sent3: the hugging Kama occurs. sent4: that not the nonprofit but the caroling occurs does not hold. sent5: if the nonprofit occurs and the reciprocating raceabout happens then the swoop does not occur. sent6: the fact that the unsocialness does not occur but the reciprocating joggle occurs is incorrect. sent7: if the snuffling Doolittle does not occur then that not the resulting but the passerineness occurs is false. sent8: if both the snuffling Doolittle and the passerine occurs the perfusion does not occur. sent9: the snuffling Doolittle occurs. sent10: that the perfusion but not the reciprocating puncture happens prevents the snuffling Doolittle. sent11: the popery happens. sent12: the resulting does not occur if the fact that not the processing but the reciprocating puncture occurs is not true. sent13: the perfusion and the hugging Kama happens if the wiglessness does not occur. sent14: if the snuffling Doolittle does not occur then the fact that the fact that the passerineness but not the cession happens is incorrect is true. sent15: if the snuffling angiology does not occur then both the unsocialness and the snuffling blindfold occurs. sent16: that the processing does not occur if the hugging Kama does not occur is true. sent17: the hugging Kama occurs if the snuffling trample but not the hugging rumor occurs. sent18: if the wiglessness does not occur then the hugging Kama occurs. sent19: if the process does not occur then the fact that the perfusion does not occur and the reciprocating puncture does not occur is wrong. sent20: that the wiglessness occurs is incorrect. sent21: that the wiglessness does not occur and the hugging Kama does not occur is caused by that the hugging rumor does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the passerineness happens is not incorrect.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the snuffling Doolittle occurs and the passerine occurs is not wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the perfusion does not occur.; sent13 & sent20 -> int3: both the perfusion and the hugging Kama occurs.; int3 -> int4: the perfusion happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the passerineness does not occur.;
the result occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the resulting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the resulting occurs is not true if the reciprocating puncture does not occur. sent2: the cession happens if the fact that the passerine happens and the cession does not occur is not true. sent3: the hugging Kama occurs. sent4: that not the nonprofit but the caroling occurs does not hold. sent5: if the nonprofit occurs and the reciprocating raceabout happens then the swoop does not occur. sent6: the fact that the unsocialness does not occur but the reciprocating joggle occurs is incorrect. sent7: if the snuffling Doolittle does not occur then that not the resulting but the passerineness occurs is false. sent8: if both the snuffling Doolittle and the passerine occurs the perfusion does not occur. sent9: the snuffling Doolittle occurs. sent10: that the perfusion but not the reciprocating puncture happens prevents the snuffling Doolittle. sent11: the popery happens. sent12: the resulting does not occur if the fact that not the processing but the reciprocating puncture occurs is not true. sent13: the perfusion and the hugging Kama happens if the wiglessness does not occur. sent14: if the snuffling Doolittle does not occur then the fact that the fact that the passerineness but not the cession happens is incorrect is true. sent15: if the snuffling angiology does not occur then both the unsocialness and the snuffling blindfold occurs. sent16: that the processing does not occur if the hugging Kama does not occur is true. sent17: the hugging Kama occurs if the snuffling trample but not the hugging rumor occurs. sent18: if the wiglessness does not occur then the hugging Kama occurs. sent19: if the process does not occur then the fact that the perfusion does not occur and the reciprocating puncture does not occur is wrong. sent20: that the wiglessness occurs is incorrect. sent21: that the wiglessness does not occur and the hugging Kama does not occur is caused by that the hugging rumor does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the passerineness happens is not incorrect.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the snuffling Doolittle occurs and the passerine occurs is not wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the perfusion does not occur.; sent13 & sent20 -> int3: both the perfusion and the hugging Kama occurs.; int3 -> int4: the perfusion happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the passerineness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__