that the clast is sounding hold.
sent1: the democrat is rheologic and is not granulomatous. sent2: the assay is not a mikvah and does not attend if the bender uncorks handed. sent3: the democrat is symphonic. sent4: if something is not a cutting but it is Lincolnesque the cochineal is not a ready. sent5: if the clast is not symphonic but it is a Hyssopus it does not bind contradictoriness. sent6: that the sprigtail does not dilapidate Kaiser and it does not bind contradictoriness is incorrect if the democrat is a pedestal. sent7: if the poisoner is a kind of a pedestal the democrat is a kind of a pedestal. sent8: if that the sprigtail does not dilapidate Kaiser and it does not bind contradictoriness is false the clast is not sounding. sent9: the fact that the sprigtail is both not rheologic and depressant is not correct. sent10: something is a Hyssopus and/or is not symphonic if it is not a mikvah. sent11: the clast is non-symphonic thing that is not a Hyssopus. sent12: there exists something such that it is not cutting and it is Lincolnesque. sent13: the ostrich is not a kind of a idolization if there exists something such that that it is a idolization and it is anarchistic is not true. sent14: if the clast is not non-depressant and not a sounding it is not symphonic. sent15: if something is a kind of a pedestal that does not bind contradictoriness the fact that it is a sounding is not false. sent16: something does not bind contradictoriness if it is both not symphonic and not a Hyssopus. sent17: that the democrat dilapidates Kaiser if the fact that the sprigtail is not rheologic and is depressant is false is not false. sent18: the bender uncorks handed if something that does ignite is sober. sent19: if the democrat does dilapidate Kaiser the clast does not dilapidate Kaiser and is a pedestal. sent20: if there is something such that it is not a ready then that the ignoramus is a idolization and it is anarchistic is false. sent21: if a Hyssopus is not symphonic it is depressant. sent22: something that is not a kind of a idolization does ignite and is sober.
sent17 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the democrat does dilapidate Kaiser hold.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the clast does not dilapidate Kaiser and is a pedestal.; int2 -> int3: the clast is a pedestal.; sent16 -> int4: if the clast is a kind of non-symphonic thing that is not a Hyssopus then it does not bind contradictoriness.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the clast does not bind contradictoriness.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the clast is a pedestal that does not bind contradictoriness.; sent15 -> int7: the fact that the clast does sound is not incorrect if it is a pedestal and it does not bind contradictoriness.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the clast is not a sounding.
sent10 -> int8: if the assay is not a kind of a mikvah then that it is a Hyssopus and/or it is not symphonic is not incorrect.; sent22 -> int9: the ostrich does ignite and does sober if it is not a idolization.; sent12 & sent4 -> int10: the cochineal is not a kind of a ready.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is unready.; int11 & sent20 -> int12: that the ignoramus is a idolization that is anarchistic is false.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is a idolization and it is anarchistic is not right.; int13 & sent13 -> int14: the ostrich is not a idolization.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the ostrich does ignite and it does sober.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it does ignite and it is sober.; int16 & sent18 -> int17: the bender uncorks handed.; sent2 & int17 -> int18: the assay is not a mikvah and does not attend.; int18 -> int19: the assay is not a mikvah.; int8 & int19 -> int20: the assay is a Hyssopus and/or it is not symphonic.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that that it is a Hyssopus and/or it is not symphonic hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the clast is sounding hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the democrat is rheologic and is not granulomatous. sent2: the assay is not a mikvah and does not attend if the bender uncorks handed. sent3: the democrat is symphonic. sent4: if something is not a cutting but it is Lincolnesque the cochineal is not a ready. sent5: if the clast is not symphonic but it is a Hyssopus it does not bind contradictoriness. sent6: that the sprigtail does not dilapidate Kaiser and it does not bind contradictoriness is incorrect if the democrat is a pedestal. sent7: if the poisoner is a kind of a pedestal the democrat is a kind of a pedestal. sent8: if that the sprigtail does not dilapidate Kaiser and it does not bind contradictoriness is false the clast is not sounding. sent9: the fact that the sprigtail is both not rheologic and depressant is not correct. sent10: something is a Hyssopus and/or is not symphonic if it is not a mikvah. sent11: the clast is non-symphonic thing that is not a Hyssopus. sent12: there exists something such that it is not cutting and it is Lincolnesque. sent13: the ostrich is not a kind of a idolization if there exists something such that that it is a idolization and it is anarchistic is not true. sent14: if the clast is not non-depressant and not a sounding it is not symphonic. sent15: if something is a kind of a pedestal that does not bind contradictoriness the fact that it is a sounding is not false. sent16: something does not bind contradictoriness if it is both not symphonic and not a Hyssopus. sent17: that the democrat dilapidates Kaiser if the fact that the sprigtail is not rheologic and is depressant is false is not false. sent18: the bender uncorks handed if something that does ignite is sober. sent19: if the democrat does dilapidate Kaiser the clast does not dilapidate Kaiser and is a pedestal. sent20: if there is something such that it is not a ready then that the ignoramus is a idolization and it is anarchistic is false. sent21: if a Hyssopus is not symphonic it is depressant. sent22: something that is not a kind of a idolization does ignite and is sober. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the democrat does dilapidate Kaiser hold.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the clast does not dilapidate Kaiser and is a pedestal.; int2 -> int3: the clast is a pedestal.; sent16 -> int4: if the clast is a kind of non-symphonic thing that is not a Hyssopus then it does not bind contradictoriness.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the clast does not bind contradictoriness.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the clast is a pedestal that does not bind contradictoriness.; sent15 -> int7: the fact that the clast does sound is not incorrect if it is a pedestal and it does not bind contradictoriness.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__