the blubber is a coherence.
sent1: the beads is not a homicide or it is not a kind of an expressionist or both. sent2: if the peony is a butterwort then the butcherbird does disoblige. sent3: if something is not a butterwort then it is not a coherence. sent4: the butcherbird is not divisional if that the beads symbolizes Sana but it is not divisional does not hold. sent5: the butcherbird does disoblige if the beads is not a kind of a homicide or is non-expressionist or both. sent6: if that the peony is a butterwort or it is non-robotics or both is incorrect then the blubber is a coherence. sent7: that that the peony is a homicide and expressionist does not hold if the butcherbird is not divisional hold. sent8: the fact that the beads symbolizes Sana but it is not divisional is not correct if the tread is a kind of a LDL. sent9: if the peony is not robotics then that the butcherbird does not disoblige hold. sent10: that the Bast is not a LDL and is not a tushery is wrong. sent11: the tread is a LDL if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a LDL and not a tushery is not correct. sent12: the beads either is not a kind of a homicide or is an expressionist or both. sent13: the butcherbird is a butterwort and/or it does not beat meltwater. sent14: something is not robotics and it is not a butterwort if it disobliges. sent15: that the surffish nourishes and/or is not calendric does not hold. sent16: the beads is either a homicide or not an expressionist or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peony is a butterwort and/or non-robotics.; sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the butcherbird disobliges.;
the blubber is not a kind of a coherence.
sent3 -> int2: the blubber is not a coherence if it is not a butterwort.; sent14 -> int3: if the blubber does disoblige then it is non-robotics thing that is not a butterwort.; sent10 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a LDL and not a tushery is not correct.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the tread is a LDL.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that the fact that the beads does symbolize Sana but it is not divisional is not right is not wrong.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the butcherbird is not divisional.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the peony is a homicide that is an expressionist is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that the fact that it is a homicide and it is expressionist is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the blubber is a coherence. ; $context$ = sent1: the beads is not a homicide or it is not a kind of an expressionist or both. sent2: if the peony is a butterwort then the butcherbird does disoblige. sent3: if something is not a butterwort then it is not a coherence. sent4: the butcherbird is not divisional if that the beads symbolizes Sana but it is not divisional does not hold. sent5: the butcherbird does disoblige if the beads is not a kind of a homicide or is non-expressionist or both. sent6: if that the peony is a butterwort or it is non-robotics or both is incorrect then the blubber is a coherence. sent7: that that the peony is a homicide and expressionist does not hold if the butcherbird is not divisional hold. sent8: the fact that the beads symbolizes Sana but it is not divisional is not correct if the tread is a kind of a LDL. sent9: if the peony is not robotics then that the butcherbird does not disoblige hold. sent10: that the Bast is not a LDL and is not a tushery is wrong. sent11: the tread is a LDL if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a LDL and not a tushery is not correct. sent12: the beads either is not a kind of a homicide or is an expressionist or both. sent13: the butcherbird is a butterwort and/or it does not beat meltwater. sent14: something is not robotics and it is not a butterwort if it disobliges. sent15: that the surffish nourishes and/or is not calendric does not hold. sent16: the beads is either a homicide or not an expressionist or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peony is a butterwort and/or non-robotics.; sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the butcherbird disobliges.; __UNKNOWN__