the fact that that the telemetry occurs and the puff does not occur hold does not hold if the conversion happens.
sent1: the cronyism happens. sent2: both the cronyism and the agglomerating occurs. sent3: the fact that both the carnifying and the leglessness happens is not incorrect. sent4: that the fabricating inula occurs is prevented by that the agglomerate occurs and the conversion happens. sent5: if the fact that the fabricating vasotomy and the telemetry happens is not true then the puff does not occur. sent6: the resumption occurs and the cronyism happens if the agglomerating does not occur. sent7: the telemetry but not the puffing occurs. sent8: if the conversion happens then the telemetry but not the puffing happens. sent9: the telemetry occurs and the puff does not occur if the fabricating inula does not occur. sent10: that both the telemetry and the puffing occurs is not right if the conversion occurs. sent11: if the fabricating inula does not occur the fact that the fact that the telemetry happens and the puff happens is wrong is true. sent12: the fact that the broiling spritz and the non-cross-sententialness happens is not right. sent13: that the telemetry happens and the puffing happens does not hold.
sent2 -> int1: the agglomerating happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conversion occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the agglomerating and the conversion happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the fabricating inula does not occur.;
the resumption happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the telemetry occurs and the puff does not occur hold does not hold if the conversion happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the cronyism happens. sent2: both the cronyism and the agglomerating occurs. sent3: the fact that both the carnifying and the leglessness happens is not incorrect. sent4: that the fabricating inula occurs is prevented by that the agglomerate occurs and the conversion happens. sent5: if the fact that the fabricating vasotomy and the telemetry happens is not true then the puff does not occur. sent6: the resumption occurs and the cronyism happens if the agglomerating does not occur. sent7: the telemetry but not the puffing occurs. sent8: if the conversion happens then the telemetry but not the puffing happens. sent9: the telemetry occurs and the puff does not occur if the fabricating inula does not occur. sent10: that both the telemetry and the puffing occurs is not right if the conversion occurs. sent11: if the fabricating inula does not occur the fact that the fact that the telemetry happens and the puff happens is wrong is true. sent12: the fact that the broiling spritz and the non-cross-sententialness happens is not right. sent13: that the telemetry happens and the puffing happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the agglomerating happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conversion occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the agglomerating and the conversion happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the fabricating inula does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__