the fact that the threat happens is not false.
sent1: if the seedlessness does not occur then the chordalness happens and the temperance happens. sent2: that the blastocoelicness happens and the euphoricness occurs yields the non-chordalness. sent3: the textualness occurs. sent4: if the bronchoscopicness does not occur then both the temperance and the seedlessness happens. sent5: that the chordalness occurs but the temperance does not occur yields that the blastocoelicness does not occur. sent6: the seedlessness occurs if the bronchoscopicness does not occur. sent7: if the syncategorematicness does not occur then both the blastocoelicness and the Esseneness happens. sent8: if the fact that not the jetting subversion but the seedlessness happens does not hold the seedlessness does not occur. sent9: the blastocoelicness happens and the syncategorematicness happens. sent10: the chordalness but not the temperance happens if the syncategorematicness does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the non-bronchoscopicness and the syncategorematicness occurs is not correct if the seedlessness does not occur. sent12: the chordalness happens if the fact that the temperance happens is not false. sent13: the euphoricness happens if the threat happens. sent14: the bronchoscopicness does not occur. sent15: the euphoricness occurs and the threat occurs if the blastocoelicness does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the jetting laughter does not occur is correct that not the jetting subversion but the seedlessness happens is not right. sent17: the galling schottische happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the threat occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the euphoricness happens is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int2: the blastocoelicness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blastocoelicness and the euphoricness occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the chordalness does not occur.; sent4 & sent14 -> int5: the temperance and the seedlessness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the temperance happens is not wrong.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the chordalness occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the threat happens is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the threat happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the seedlessness does not occur then the chordalness happens and the temperance happens. sent2: that the blastocoelicness happens and the euphoricness occurs yields the non-chordalness. sent3: the textualness occurs. sent4: if the bronchoscopicness does not occur then both the temperance and the seedlessness happens. sent5: that the chordalness occurs but the temperance does not occur yields that the blastocoelicness does not occur. sent6: the seedlessness occurs if the bronchoscopicness does not occur. sent7: if the syncategorematicness does not occur then both the blastocoelicness and the Esseneness happens. sent8: if the fact that not the jetting subversion but the seedlessness happens does not hold the seedlessness does not occur. sent9: the blastocoelicness happens and the syncategorematicness happens. sent10: the chordalness but not the temperance happens if the syncategorematicness does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the non-bronchoscopicness and the syncategorematicness occurs is not correct if the seedlessness does not occur. sent12: the chordalness happens if the fact that the temperance happens is not false. sent13: the euphoricness happens if the threat happens. sent14: the bronchoscopicness does not occur. sent15: the euphoricness occurs and the threat occurs if the blastocoelicness does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the jetting laughter does not occur is correct that not the jetting subversion but the seedlessness happens is not right. sent17: the galling schottische happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the threat occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the euphoricness happens is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int2: the blastocoelicness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blastocoelicness and the euphoricness occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the chordalness does not occur.; sent4 & sent14 -> int5: the temperance and the seedlessness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the temperance happens is not wrong.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the chordalness occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__