the Bordeaux is a kind of a toyon and/or is not a sick.
sent1: if the naphthalene is sick and/or it clusters the Bordeaux does not verbalize. sent2: something is not a subversion if that it clusters hold. sent3: that the Bordeaux is a toyon and/or it is not a sick does not hold if the lee is not a toyon. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that that it is sick thing that is not a toyon hold is not correct then the Trilby does not cluster. sent5: the lee does not cluster if the naphthalene is a kind of a sick and/or is a toyon. sent6: the batfish is a lung. sent7: if something that is a Cavendish does not usher polypectomy then it does cluster. sent8: the naphthalene clusters if the lee clusters. sent9: if the naphthalene clusters and/or it does verbalize the lee is not a kind of a toyon. sent10: the naphthalene is not a kind of a toyon if the lee is a subversion. sent11: there is something such that that it is a kind of a sick that is not a kind of a toyon is incorrect. sent12: the Bordeaux is not a subversion. sent13: if the lee is a sick then the Bordeaux is not a kind of a toyon. sent14: if the naphthalene is not a kind of a subversion the Bordeaux does verbalize and is a kind of a toyon. sent15: the fact that the naphthalene is a toyon hold. sent16: the Bordeaux does not verbalize. sent17: the Bordeaux is not a subversion if the naphthalene is not a kind of a subversion. sent18: that the orrery is humble and/or it is not a toyon is not correct. sent19: the naphthalene does verbalize and it is a subversion. sent20: that the Bordeaux is a sick hold.
sent19 -> int1: the naphthalene does verbalize.; int1 -> int2: either the naphthalene clusters or it does verbalize or both.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the lee is not a kind of a toyon.; sent3 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Bordeaux is a toyon or is not a sick or both.
sent2 -> int4: if the naphthalene clusters then it is not a subversion.; sent7 -> int5: if the lee is a Cavendish that does not usher polypectomy then it clusters.; sent6 -> int6: there is something such that it is a kind of a lung.;
$hypothesis$ = the Bordeaux is a kind of a toyon and/or is not a sick. ; $context$ = sent1: if the naphthalene is sick and/or it clusters the Bordeaux does not verbalize. sent2: something is not a subversion if that it clusters hold. sent3: that the Bordeaux is a toyon and/or it is not a sick does not hold if the lee is not a toyon. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that that it is sick thing that is not a toyon hold is not correct then the Trilby does not cluster. sent5: the lee does not cluster if the naphthalene is a kind of a sick and/or is a toyon. sent6: the batfish is a lung. sent7: if something that is a Cavendish does not usher polypectomy then it does cluster. sent8: the naphthalene clusters if the lee clusters. sent9: if the naphthalene clusters and/or it does verbalize the lee is not a kind of a toyon. sent10: the naphthalene is not a kind of a toyon if the lee is a subversion. sent11: there is something such that that it is a kind of a sick that is not a kind of a toyon is incorrect. sent12: the Bordeaux is not a subversion. sent13: if the lee is a sick then the Bordeaux is not a kind of a toyon. sent14: if the naphthalene is not a kind of a subversion the Bordeaux does verbalize and is a kind of a toyon. sent15: the fact that the naphthalene is a toyon hold. sent16: the Bordeaux does not verbalize. sent17: the Bordeaux is not a subversion if the naphthalene is not a kind of a subversion. sent18: that the orrery is humble and/or it is not a toyon is not correct. sent19: the naphthalene does verbalize and it is a subversion. sent20: that the Bordeaux is a sick hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the naphthalene does verbalize.; int1 -> int2: either the naphthalene clusters or it does verbalize or both.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the lee is not a kind of a toyon.; sent3 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__