that there is something such that if it is entrepreneurial then the fact that it does not cloud shopaholic and is not connotative is wrong is incorrect.
sent1: if something is entrepreneurial then that it clouds shopaholic and is not connotative is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is biquadratic it does not inflate angiosperm and it is not mandibular. sent3: the fact that the shopaholic is not a Catostomus but a Illecebrum is not true if that it is connotative is true. sent4: if something is a samekh then that it is a kind of incestuous thing that does not inflate sweatshirt is not right. sent5: if something is a muzzle that it does inflate calk and is not technological is not right. sent6: that something does not cloud shopaholic and it is non-connotative is not true if it is entrepreneurial. sent7: there is something such that if it is entrepreneurial then the fact that it does not cloud shopaholic and it is connotative is not right. sent8: the fact that something does not cloud shopaholic and is connotative is not true if it is entrepreneurial. sent9: if the shopaholic is entrepreneurial that it does not cloud shopaholic and is connotative is false. sent10: if the shopaholic is entrepreneurial the fact that it does cloud shopaholic and it is not connotative is wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it is entrepreneurial it does not cloud shopaholic and is not connotative. sent12: something does not cloud shopaholic and it is not connotative if it is entrepreneurial. sent13: if the shopaholic is entrepreneurial then it does not cloud shopaholic and it is not connotative.
sent6 -> int1: if the shopaholic is entrepreneurial then that it does not cloud shopaholic and it is not connotative is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is entrepreneurial then the fact that it does not cloud shopaholic and is not connotative is wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is entrepreneurial then that it clouds shopaholic and is not connotative is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is biquadratic it does not inflate angiosperm and it is not mandibular. sent3: the fact that the shopaholic is not a Catostomus but a Illecebrum is not true if that it is connotative is true. sent4: if something is a samekh then that it is a kind of incestuous thing that does not inflate sweatshirt is not right. sent5: if something is a muzzle that it does inflate calk and is not technological is not right. sent6: that something does not cloud shopaholic and it is non-connotative is not true if it is entrepreneurial. sent7: there is something such that if it is entrepreneurial then the fact that it does not cloud shopaholic and it is connotative is not right. sent8: the fact that something does not cloud shopaholic and is connotative is not true if it is entrepreneurial. sent9: if the shopaholic is entrepreneurial that it does not cloud shopaholic and is connotative is false. sent10: if the shopaholic is entrepreneurial the fact that it does cloud shopaholic and it is not connotative is wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it is entrepreneurial it does not cloud shopaholic and is not connotative. sent12: something does not cloud shopaholic and it is not connotative if it is entrepreneurial. sent13: if the shopaholic is entrepreneurial then it does not cloud shopaholic and it is not connotative. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the shopaholic is entrepreneurial then that it does not cloud shopaholic and it is not connotative is false.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__