the careerist does not corkscrew purser.
sent1: that the purl is a kind of a Scipio is true. sent2: the careerist is not a selflessness if that the fact that the shop is a kind of a paltriness that is psychometric is false is not false. sent3: the purl is a kind of an affect. sent4: the Shakespearian is not psychometric if the purl is a kind of a Scipio and it does affect. sent5: that if the Shakespearian is not psychometric then that that the shop is a kind of a paltriness and it is psychometric hold is false is not incorrect. sent6: if something is not a selflessness and/or does not coach Diodon it does not corkscrew purser. sent7: if either something is not cheliceral or it is not a cyberart or both it is not psychometric.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the purl is a Scipio and an affect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Shakespearian is non-psychometric.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the shop is a kind of a paltriness and it is psychometric does not hold.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the careerist is not a kind of a selflessness.; int4 -> int5: the careerist is not a selflessness and/or it does not coach Diodon.; sent6 -> int6: the careerist does not corkscrew purser if it is not a kind of a selflessness and/or it does not coach Diodon.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
if the trunk is not cheliceral and/or it is not a cyberart then it is non-psychometric.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the careerist does not corkscrew purser. ; $context$ = sent1: that the purl is a kind of a Scipio is true. sent2: the careerist is not a selflessness if that the fact that the shop is a kind of a paltriness that is psychometric is false is not false. sent3: the purl is a kind of an affect. sent4: the Shakespearian is not psychometric if the purl is a kind of a Scipio and it does affect. sent5: that if the Shakespearian is not psychometric then that that the shop is a kind of a paltriness and it is psychometric hold is false is not incorrect. sent6: if something is not a selflessness and/or does not coach Diodon it does not corkscrew purser. sent7: if either something is not cheliceral or it is not a cyberart or both it is not psychometric. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the purl is a Scipio and an affect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Shakespearian is non-psychometric.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the shop is a kind of a paltriness and it is psychometric does not hold.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the careerist is not a kind of a selflessness.; int4 -> int5: the careerist is not a selflessness and/or it does not coach Diodon.; sent6 -> int6: the careerist does not corkscrew purser if it is not a kind of a selflessness and/or it does not coach Diodon.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__