the clinicalness occurs.
sent1: the camouflaging occurs. sent2: if the fact that not the undiplomaticness but the importing happens is not correct then the coughing does not occur. sent3: the flattening patio does not occur. sent4: the casing spoonerism does not occur. sent5: the burial occurs. sent6: the turfing down-and-out does not occur if that not the clerkship but the surveillance occurs is not correct. sent7: the abolition does not occur if the casing perigon does not occur. sent8: that the commensurateness happens prevents that the casing venipuncture does not occur. sent9: if that the casing venipuncture does not occur and the pleomorphicness occurs is incorrect the fact that the charity does not occur is true. sent10: that the schematizing happens is not wrong. sent11: that the muckraking happens and the defalcation occurs is incorrect. sent12: if the abolition occurs that not the flattening trustbuster but the muckraking occurs does not hold. sent13: that not the coloring but the putting occurs is not correct. sent14: the turfing Mesua does not occur. sent15: that the abolition occurs and the contestableness occurs is brought about by that the casing blockhouse does not occur. sent16: that the muckraking does not occur and the defalcation happens is incorrect. sent17: the tapering does not occur if that the fact that not the muckraking but the defalcation occurs is correct is false. sent18: the unreliableness occurs. sent19: the tapering does not occur if the muckraking happens. sent20: if the clinicalness happens then the tapering happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clinicalness happens.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the tapering occurs.; sent17 & sent16 -> int2: the tapering does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the clinicalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the clinicalness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the camouflaging occurs. sent2: if the fact that not the undiplomaticness but the importing happens is not correct then the coughing does not occur. sent3: the flattening patio does not occur. sent4: the casing spoonerism does not occur. sent5: the burial occurs. sent6: the turfing down-and-out does not occur if that not the clerkship but the surveillance occurs is not correct. sent7: the abolition does not occur if the casing perigon does not occur. sent8: that the commensurateness happens prevents that the casing venipuncture does not occur. sent9: if that the casing venipuncture does not occur and the pleomorphicness occurs is incorrect the fact that the charity does not occur is true. sent10: that the schematizing happens is not wrong. sent11: that the muckraking happens and the defalcation occurs is incorrect. sent12: if the abolition occurs that not the flattening trustbuster but the muckraking occurs does not hold. sent13: that not the coloring but the putting occurs is not correct. sent14: the turfing Mesua does not occur. sent15: that the abolition occurs and the contestableness occurs is brought about by that the casing blockhouse does not occur. sent16: that the muckraking does not occur and the defalcation happens is incorrect. sent17: the tapering does not occur if that the fact that not the muckraking but the defalcation occurs is correct is false. sent18: the unreliableness occurs. sent19: the tapering does not occur if the muckraking happens. sent20: if the clinicalness happens then the tapering happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clinicalness happens.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the tapering occurs.; sent17 & sent16 -> int2: the tapering does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__