the March occurs.
sent1: the crossover does not occur. sent2: the raftering eryngo does not occur. sent3: the verdict occurs. sent4: if the fact that the bloodying does not occur is not incorrect then that the zoning does not occur is not false. sent5: if the squeegeeing Rembrandt does not occur and the March occurs then the communicating occurs. sent6: the powwowing Epirus happens. sent7: the non-sameness brings about that the powwowing Epirus happens and the wester does not occur. sent8: the Sufi and the entomophilousness happens. sent9: that the spinalness does not occur is caused by that the powwowing Epirus occurs and the sameness occurs. sent10: the March occurs if the powwowing Epirus does not occur. sent11: the porphyriticness does not occur and the batrachomyomachia happens. sent12: the squeegeeing Rembrandt does not occur if the spinalness does not occur. sent13: the communicating does not occur. sent14: the sameness occurs. sent15: the squeegeeing resort does not occur.
sent6 & sent14 -> int1: the powwowing Epirus and the sameness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the spinalness does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the squeegeeing Rembrandt does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the March happens is not false.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the squeegeeing Rembrandt does not occur but the March happens.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the communicating occurs.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the wester does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the March occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the crossover does not occur. sent2: the raftering eryngo does not occur. sent3: the verdict occurs. sent4: if the fact that the bloodying does not occur is not incorrect then that the zoning does not occur is not false. sent5: if the squeegeeing Rembrandt does not occur and the March occurs then the communicating occurs. sent6: the powwowing Epirus happens. sent7: the non-sameness brings about that the powwowing Epirus happens and the wester does not occur. sent8: the Sufi and the entomophilousness happens. sent9: that the spinalness does not occur is caused by that the powwowing Epirus occurs and the sameness occurs. sent10: the March occurs if the powwowing Epirus does not occur. sent11: the porphyriticness does not occur and the batrachomyomachia happens. sent12: the squeegeeing Rembrandt does not occur if the spinalness does not occur. sent13: the communicating does not occur. sent14: the sameness occurs. sent15: the squeegeeing resort does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent14 -> int1: the powwowing Epirus and the sameness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the spinalness does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the squeegeeing Rembrandt does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the March happens is not false.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the squeegeeing Rembrandt does not occur but the March happens.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the communicating occurs.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__