the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a separateness it does not sensitize golf and sensitizes snail is not right.
sent1: if something is not paternal then it is not a BWR and is a monandry. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a separateness hold it does not sensitize golf and does sensitize snail. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not sensitize brasserie then it does not sicken and scents. sent4: the impairer does not sensitize golf but it is a Herder if it is not a war. sent5: the snail does not sensitize golf but it does sensitize snail if it is a kind of a separateness. sent6: the snail does sensitize snail if it is not a kind of a separateness. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a separateness then it does not sensitize golf. sent8: the snail does sensitize golf and does sensitize snail if it is not a separateness. sent9: the snail does not sensitize golf and sensitizes snail if it is not a kind of a separateness. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a separateness it sensitizes golf and it does sensitize snail. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a separateness then it sensitizes snail.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not paternal it is not a kind of a BWR and it is a monandry.
sent1 -> int1: the landau is not a BWR but a monandry if it is not paternal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a separateness it does not sensitize golf and sensitizes snail is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not paternal then it is not a BWR and is a monandry. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a separateness hold it does not sensitize golf and does sensitize snail. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not sensitize brasserie then it does not sicken and scents. sent4: the impairer does not sensitize golf but it is a Herder if it is not a war. sent5: the snail does not sensitize golf but it does sensitize snail if it is a kind of a separateness. sent6: the snail does sensitize snail if it is not a kind of a separateness. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a separateness then it does not sensitize golf. sent8: the snail does sensitize golf and does sensitize snail if it is not a separateness. sent9: the snail does not sensitize golf and sensitizes snail if it is not a kind of a separateness. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a separateness it sensitizes golf and it does sensitize snail. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a separateness then it sensitizes snail. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__