that the galling Aegyptopithecus happens triggers that the crowing does not occur.
sent1: the non-playableness leads to the crew. sent2: that the galling amazon but not the concentration happens is wrong if the potentness does not occur. sent3: that the galling amazon happens but the concentration does not occur is caused by that the clericalness does not occur. sent4: the crowing occurs. sent5: if the fact that the galling Aegyptopithecus occurs hold the crowing happens. sent6: if the clericalness does not occur then the galling amazon happens. sent7: the hypertonicness does not occur. sent8: the galling amazon happens. sent9: that the fact that the fertilization and the non-biosystematicness occurs is incorrect is right. sent10: the clericalness does not occur. sent11: if the playableness does not occur then the crowing does not occur. sent12: the potentness is prevented by that both the galling Aegyptopithecus and the playableness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the galling Aegyptopithecus happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the playableness happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the galling Aegyptopithecus and the playableness occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the potentness does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that that the galling amazon but not the concentration happens is false is correct.; sent3 & sent10 -> int4: the galling amazon occurs and the concentration does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the playableness does not occur.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the crowing does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the galling Aegyptopithecus happens triggers that the crowing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-playableness leads to the crew. sent2: that the galling amazon but not the concentration happens is wrong if the potentness does not occur. sent3: that the galling amazon happens but the concentration does not occur is caused by that the clericalness does not occur. sent4: the crowing occurs. sent5: if the fact that the galling Aegyptopithecus occurs hold the crowing happens. sent6: if the clericalness does not occur then the galling amazon happens. sent7: the hypertonicness does not occur. sent8: the galling amazon happens. sent9: that the fact that the fertilization and the non-biosystematicness occurs is incorrect is right. sent10: the clericalness does not occur. sent11: if the playableness does not occur then the crowing does not occur. sent12: the potentness is prevented by that both the galling Aegyptopithecus and the playableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the galling Aegyptopithecus happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the playableness happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the galling Aegyptopithecus and the playableness occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the potentness does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that that the galling amazon but not the concentration happens is false is correct.; sent3 & sent10 -> int4: the galling amazon occurs and the concentration does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the playableness does not occur.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the crowing does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__