the utility is a kind of a loofah.
sent1: if that the maleberry is Anguillan but it is not a handling does not hold it does handling. sent2: that the hydrocolloid is both not a sporting and Anguillan is wrong if that it does not underlie is true. sent3: the maleberry is non-seismological a obiism. sent4: something does not handle and does not interpret maleberry. sent5: there exists something such that that it is non-Anguillan and non-cerebrovascular does not hold. sent6: if something is not a obiism then the fact that it is not a nutmeg-yew and it is not cantonal is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the maleberry duns noma but it does not interpret maleberry is false then it does not handle. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a Anguillan the maleberry does subdivide hydrocolloid. sent9: the utility is not seismological if the fact that it is a obiism and is not a kind of a loofah does not hold. sent10: the utility is a kind of a loofah if there is something such that it does dun noma and is a kind of a Anguillan. sent11: that something is a kind of non-seismological a obiism does not hold if it is not a handling. sent12: the maleberry is a Anguillan if there exists something such that the fact that it is not Anguillan and is not cerebrovascular does not hold. sent13: there is something such that it does not interpret maleberry and is not a obiism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the maleberry duns noma but it does not interpret maleberry does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the maleberry is not a handling.; sent11 -> int2: that that the maleberry is not seismological and is a obiism hold is not right if it is not a handling.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the maleberry is both not seismological and a obiism is false is true.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the maleberry does dun noma and does not interpret maleberry.; int5 -> int6: the maleberry duns noma.; sent5 & sent12 -> int7: the maleberry is Anguillan.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the maleberry does dun noma and it is Anguillan.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does dun noma and it is a Anguillan.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it is not a nutmeg-yew and it is not cantonal is not correct.
sent6 -> int10: that the maleberry is not a nutmeg-yew and it is not cantonal does not hold if it is not a kind of a obiism.;
$hypothesis$ = the utility is a kind of a loofah. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the maleberry is Anguillan but it is not a handling does not hold it does handling. sent2: that the hydrocolloid is both not a sporting and Anguillan is wrong if that it does not underlie is true. sent3: the maleberry is non-seismological a obiism. sent4: something does not handle and does not interpret maleberry. sent5: there exists something such that that it is non-Anguillan and non-cerebrovascular does not hold. sent6: if something is not a obiism then the fact that it is not a nutmeg-yew and it is not cantonal is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the maleberry duns noma but it does not interpret maleberry is false then it does not handle. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a Anguillan the maleberry does subdivide hydrocolloid. sent9: the utility is not seismological if the fact that it is a obiism and is not a kind of a loofah does not hold. sent10: the utility is a kind of a loofah if there is something such that it does dun noma and is a kind of a Anguillan. sent11: that something is a kind of non-seismological a obiism does not hold if it is not a handling. sent12: the maleberry is a Anguillan if there exists something such that the fact that it is not Anguillan and is not cerebrovascular does not hold. sent13: there is something such that it does not interpret maleberry and is not a obiism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the maleberry duns noma but it does not interpret maleberry does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the maleberry is not a handling.; sent11 -> int2: that that the maleberry is not seismological and is a obiism hold is not right if it is not a handling.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the maleberry is both not seismological and a obiism is false is true.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the maleberry does dun noma and does not interpret maleberry.; int5 -> int6: the maleberry duns noma.; sent5 & sent12 -> int7: the maleberry is Anguillan.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the maleberry does dun noma and it is Anguillan.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does dun noma and it is a Anguillan.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__