the isotherm is not a orientalist.
sent1: if the incompetent is a confluence then that it is non-manorial thing that respects gathering is false. sent2: the azurite is a commensurateness if there exists something such that the fact that it is not manorial and respects gathering does not hold. sent3: if the azurite is a commensurateness then the isotherm is a orientalist. sent4: something is biaxial a confluence if it does not respect mouflon. sent5: the fact that the incompetent is not a kind of a confluence and/or it respects mouflon is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incompetent is not a confluence.; assump1 -> int1: the incompetent is not a confluence and/or it does respect mouflon.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the incompetent is a confluence.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the incompetent is non-manorial thing that respects gathering does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-manorial thing that does respect gathering is wrong.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the azurite is a commensurateness.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the incompetent is biaxial.
sent4 -> int7: the incompetent is biaxial and it is a confluence if it does not respect mouflon.;
$hypothesis$ = the isotherm is not a orientalist. ; $context$ = sent1: if the incompetent is a confluence then that it is non-manorial thing that respects gathering is false. sent2: the azurite is a commensurateness if there exists something such that the fact that it is not manorial and respects gathering does not hold. sent3: if the azurite is a commensurateness then the isotherm is a orientalist. sent4: something is biaxial a confluence if it does not respect mouflon. sent5: the fact that the incompetent is not a kind of a confluence and/or it respects mouflon is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incompetent is not a confluence.; assump1 -> int1: the incompetent is not a confluence and/or it does respect mouflon.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the incompetent is a confluence.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the incompetent is non-manorial thing that respects gathering does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-manorial thing that does respect gathering is wrong.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the azurite is a commensurateness.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__