that the Tagalog does mutate innings and is inconvenient is incorrect.
sent1: the plot is not a kind of a doggedness and is not epicarpal if the Uighur does not deviate. sent2: the fact that the plot does not deviate hold if there is something such that the fact that it either is not epicarpal or does voice or both does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the Uighur is epicarpal hold then the fact that the glossy is not epicarpal and/or it voices is false. sent4: if there is something such that it does not deviate and it is not a kind of a dining-room the cyberart is not inconvenient. sent5: the slash does not deviate and it is not a kind of a dining-room if the plot does not deviate. sent6: if the Uighur is not epicarpal then the fact that the Tagalog mutates innings and is inconvenient is incorrect. sent7: if the cyberart is not inconvenient the Tagalog mutates innings and is inconvenient. sent8: something does voice if it is not convenient. sent9: the Uighur is both epicarpal and a doggedness.
sent9 -> int1: the Uighur is epicarpal.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the glossy is not epicarpal or does voice or both is not right.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it either is not epicarpal or voices or both is not true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the plot does not deviate.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the slash does not deviate and it is not a dining-room.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does not deviate and it is not a kind of a dining-room.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the cyberart is not inconvenient.; sent7 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the plot is not a doggedness.
sent8 -> int8: if the glossy is inconvenient it voices.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Tagalog does mutate innings and is inconvenient is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the plot is not a kind of a doggedness and is not epicarpal if the Uighur does not deviate. sent2: the fact that the plot does not deviate hold if there is something such that the fact that it either is not epicarpal or does voice or both does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the Uighur is epicarpal hold then the fact that the glossy is not epicarpal and/or it voices is false. sent4: if there is something such that it does not deviate and it is not a kind of a dining-room the cyberart is not inconvenient. sent5: the slash does not deviate and it is not a kind of a dining-room if the plot does not deviate. sent6: if the Uighur is not epicarpal then the fact that the Tagalog mutates innings and is inconvenient is incorrect. sent7: if the cyberart is not inconvenient the Tagalog mutates innings and is inconvenient. sent8: something does voice if it is not convenient. sent9: the Uighur is both epicarpal and a doggedness. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the Uighur is epicarpal.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the glossy is not epicarpal or does voice or both is not right.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it either is not epicarpal or voices or both is not true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the plot does not deviate.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the slash does not deviate and it is not a dining-room.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does not deviate and it is not a kind of a dining-room.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the cyberart is not inconvenient.; sent7 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__