the swindler is not unexcitable.
sent1: the reformatory strings if that the foster-father deploys and is not anthropological is not correct. sent2: if something does string that the fact that the reformatory is not a kind of a frazzle and does deploy is true does not hold. sent3: the reformatory primes. sent4: if the fact that the reformatory either is not counterterror or frazzles or both is not right it is not a kind of a string. sent5: if the reformatory is a kind of a prime then that it is not counterterror and/or is a kind of a frazzle is false. sent6: there is something such that it is a string. sent7: the swindler is unexcitable if the neurohormone is unexcitable. sent8: that something does deploy but it is not anthropological is wrong if it is not a joke. sent9: if that the neurohormone does not dissemble Illicium and it is not a kind of a hydrophobicity is not true then the foster-father is not a joke. sent10: that the neurohormone does not dissemble Illicium and is not a hydrophobicity is wrong if the swindler is unexcitable. sent11: the foster-father does frazzle. sent12: if something does not deploy it is not anthropological. sent13: if something is not anthropological that it is non-unexcitable thing that is not a joke is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the swindler is unexcitable.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the neurohormone does not dissemble Illicium and it is not a kind of a hydrophobicity does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the foster-father does not joke.; sent8 -> int3: the fact that if the foster-father is not the joke that the foster-father deploys and is not anthropological does not hold hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the foster-father deploys and is not anthropological hold is incorrect.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the reformatory does string.; sent5 & sent3 -> int6: that either the reformatory is not counterterror or it is a frazzle or both does not hold.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the reformatory does not string.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the swindler is unexcitable.
sent13 -> int9: if the foster-father is not anthropological that it is not unexcitable and it is not a kind of a joke does not hold.; sent12 -> int10: if the foster-father does not deploy it is not anthropological.; sent6 & sent2 -> int11: that the reformatory is not a frazzle and deploys is not true.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a frazzle and it deploys is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the swindler is not unexcitable. ; $context$ = sent1: the reformatory strings if that the foster-father deploys and is not anthropological is not correct. sent2: if something does string that the fact that the reformatory is not a kind of a frazzle and does deploy is true does not hold. sent3: the reformatory primes. sent4: if the fact that the reformatory either is not counterterror or frazzles or both is not right it is not a kind of a string. sent5: if the reformatory is a kind of a prime then that it is not counterterror and/or is a kind of a frazzle is false. sent6: there is something such that it is a string. sent7: the swindler is unexcitable if the neurohormone is unexcitable. sent8: that something does deploy but it is not anthropological is wrong if it is not a joke. sent9: if that the neurohormone does not dissemble Illicium and it is not a kind of a hydrophobicity is not true then the foster-father is not a joke. sent10: that the neurohormone does not dissemble Illicium and is not a hydrophobicity is wrong if the swindler is unexcitable. sent11: the foster-father does frazzle. sent12: if something does not deploy it is not anthropological. sent13: if something is not anthropological that it is non-unexcitable thing that is not a joke is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the swindler is unexcitable.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the neurohormone does not dissemble Illicium and it is not a kind of a hydrophobicity does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the foster-father does not joke.; sent8 -> int3: the fact that if the foster-father is not the joke that the foster-father deploys and is not anthropological does not hold hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the foster-father deploys and is not anthropological hold is incorrect.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the reformatory does string.; sent5 & sent3 -> int6: that either the reformatory is not counterterror or it is a frazzle or both does not hold.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the reformatory does not string.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__