the duffel does not seep cellphone and is legislative.
sent1: if something is a Swedish and it does seep tinplate then it does not seep cellphone. sent2: the duffel is a lathi but it is not a cephaloridine. sent3: if the fact that the protection is both a cephaloridine and a brahman is not right then the duffel is not a lathi. sent4: the duffel is not a kind of a cephaloridine. sent5: there is something such that it is both a manuscript and an inconstancy. sent6: if the duffel is a kind of a lathi that is not a cephaloridine it is legislative. sent7: the adnexa is not a outthrust and is legislative. sent8: that the duffel is a Meissner hold. sent9: the duffel is not a kind of a cephaloridine and is austenitic. sent10: the duffel is ceric. sent11: that something does not seep cellphone but it is legislative is wrong if it is not a kind of a lathi. sent12: the duffel is Swedish thing that seeps tinplate. sent13: something is not a embolectomy if it is a Tanga and a intermezzo. sent14: the duffel does seep tinplate. sent15: that the duffel is legislative is not wrong if it is a kind of a lathi and it is a cephaloridine.
sent1 -> int1: if the duffel is a Swedish and seeps tinplate it does not seep cellphone.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the duffel does not seep cellphone.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: the duffel is legislative.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the duffel does not seep cellphone and is not non-legislative is not correct.
sent11 -> int4: if the duffel is not a kind of a lathi that it does not seep cellphone and it is not non-legislative is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the duffel does not seep cellphone and is legislative. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Swedish and it does seep tinplate then it does not seep cellphone. sent2: the duffel is a lathi but it is not a cephaloridine. sent3: if the fact that the protection is both a cephaloridine and a brahman is not right then the duffel is not a lathi. sent4: the duffel is not a kind of a cephaloridine. sent5: there is something such that it is both a manuscript and an inconstancy. sent6: if the duffel is a kind of a lathi that is not a cephaloridine it is legislative. sent7: the adnexa is not a outthrust and is legislative. sent8: that the duffel is a Meissner hold. sent9: the duffel is not a kind of a cephaloridine and is austenitic. sent10: the duffel is ceric. sent11: that something does not seep cellphone but it is legislative is wrong if it is not a kind of a lathi. sent12: the duffel is Swedish thing that seeps tinplate. sent13: something is not a embolectomy if it is a Tanga and a intermezzo. sent14: the duffel does seep tinplate. sent15: that the duffel is legislative is not wrong if it is a kind of a lathi and it is a cephaloridine. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the duffel is a Swedish and seeps tinplate it does not seep cellphone.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the duffel does not seep cellphone.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: the duffel is legislative.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__