the detachment does not occur and the seeking does not occur.
sent1: the force-out does not occur if the banning preservationist and the raptorialness happens. sent2: that the termination does not occur but the cyberneticsness happens prevents the non-raptorialness. sent3: if the naturisticness happens the suborning nekton happens. sent4: the lobbing Nepa does not occur and the exploratoriness occurs. sent5: the non-occipitalness yields the fact that that the detachment does not occur and the seek does not occur is not wrong. sent6: either the unseaworthiness or that the regeneration does not occur or both is caused by that the behaving does not occur. sent7: that the force-out and/or that the banning preservationist does not occur results in that the force-out occurs hold. sent8: the incarnation does not occur if that the occipitalness does not occur but the incarnation occurs is incorrect. sent9: the narrowedness does not occur and/or the occipitalness occurs if the detachment occurs. sent10: the fronting does not occur and the negotiation does not occur. sent11: the incarnation does not occur. sent12: if the force-out occurs the narrowedness happens. sent13: that the force-out happens and/or that the banning preservationist does not occur is caused by the non-raptorialness. sent14: the excluding occurs. sent15: the fact that both the non-occipitalness and the incarnation occurs is false if the platyrrhine does not occur. sent16: if the force-out does not occur both the detachment and the seek occurs. sent17: the incarnation does not occur and the platyrrhine happens. sent18: that the platyrrhine occurs and the occipitalness happens causes that the narrowing does not occur.
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the platyrrhine happens is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the occipitalness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the platyrrhineness happens and the occipitalness occurs.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the narrowing does not occur.;
the lobbing escrow does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the detachment does not occur and the seeking does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the force-out does not occur if the banning preservationist and the raptorialness happens. sent2: that the termination does not occur but the cyberneticsness happens prevents the non-raptorialness. sent3: if the naturisticness happens the suborning nekton happens. sent4: the lobbing Nepa does not occur and the exploratoriness occurs. sent5: the non-occipitalness yields the fact that that the detachment does not occur and the seek does not occur is not wrong. sent6: either the unseaworthiness or that the regeneration does not occur or both is caused by that the behaving does not occur. sent7: that the force-out and/or that the banning preservationist does not occur results in that the force-out occurs hold. sent8: the incarnation does not occur if that the occipitalness does not occur but the incarnation occurs is incorrect. sent9: the narrowedness does not occur and/or the occipitalness occurs if the detachment occurs. sent10: the fronting does not occur and the negotiation does not occur. sent11: the incarnation does not occur. sent12: if the force-out occurs the narrowedness happens. sent13: that the force-out happens and/or that the banning preservationist does not occur is caused by the non-raptorialness. sent14: the excluding occurs. sent15: the fact that both the non-occipitalness and the incarnation occurs is false if the platyrrhine does not occur. sent16: if the force-out does not occur both the detachment and the seek occurs. sent17: the incarnation does not occur and the platyrrhine happens. sent18: that the platyrrhine occurs and the occipitalness happens causes that the narrowing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the platyrrhine happens is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the occipitalness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the platyrrhineness happens and the occipitalness occurs.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the narrowing does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__