the fact that the pussley does not rear Mexican if the parathyroid is not cantonal is not right.
sent1: that the pussley is not a virtuoso is right. sent2: if the fact that that something is not generous and/or it is a kind of a ephah is right is not correct it does not rear Mexican. sent3: the pinfold is generous and does not rear surrejoinder. sent4: the fact that the pussley is not generous and/or is a kind of a ephah is not right if the Mexican is not generous. sent5: if that something either is not a dresser or is a rorqual or both is incorrect then it is not peripteral. sent6: the hub-and-spoke is not a ephah. sent7: if that something is an incitement and/or is a Nixon is not correct it is not double. sent8: the parathyroid is a kind of a ephah if the pussley is not a kind of a ephah. sent9: the parathyroid is a bondage. sent10: if something is a bondage and is not cantonal the Mexican is not generous. sent11: the parathyroid is not generous. sent12: if the parathyroid is not generous the pussley is generous. sent13: that that the cyanide is not a ephah and rears Mexican is false is not false. sent14: if the fact that the parathyroid is either not generous or a ephah or both is false then it is cantonal. sent15: that the parathyroid does rear Mexican is correct. sent16: something is not a margrave if that it either is a Impressionism or is a panda or both is not correct. sent17: something is not a prong if the fact that it is an incitement and/or pages is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the parathyroid is not cantonal hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the parathyroid is a kind of a bondage but it is not cantonal.; int1 -> int2: something is a bondage but it is not cantonal.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the Mexican is not generous is right.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the pussley is not generous and/or it is a kind of a ephah is not true.; sent2 -> int5: the fact that the pussley does not rear Mexican is correct if that it is not generous and/or is a kind of a ephah does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pussley does not rear Mexican.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the Mexican is a bondage.
sent13 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a ephah and it rears Mexican does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pussley does not rear Mexican if the parathyroid is not cantonal is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pussley is not a virtuoso is right. sent2: if the fact that that something is not generous and/or it is a kind of a ephah is right is not correct it does not rear Mexican. sent3: the pinfold is generous and does not rear surrejoinder. sent4: the fact that the pussley is not generous and/or is a kind of a ephah is not right if the Mexican is not generous. sent5: if that something either is not a dresser or is a rorqual or both is incorrect then it is not peripteral. sent6: the hub-and-spoke is not a ephah. sent7: if that something is an incitement and/or is a Nixon is not correct it is not double. sent8: the parathyroid is a kind of a ephah if the pussley is not a kind of a ephah. sent9: the parathyroid is a bondage. sent10: if something is a bondage and is not cantonal the Mexican is not generous. sent11: the parathyroid is not generous. sent12: if the parathyroid is not generous the pussley is generous. sent13: that that the cyanide is not a ephah and rears Mexican is false is not false. sent14: if the fact that the parathyroid is either not generous or a ephah or both is false then it is cantonal. sent15: that the parathyroid does rear Mexican is correct. sent16: something is not a margrave if that it either is a Impressionism or is a panda or both is not correct. sent17: something is not a prong if the fact that it is an incitement and/or pages is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the parathyroid is not cantonal hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the parathyroid is a kind of a bondage but it is not cantonal.; int1 -> int2: something is a bondage but it is not cantonal.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the Mexican is not generous is right.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the pussley is not generous and/or it is a kind of a ephah is not true.; sent2 -> int5: the fact that the pussley does not rear Mexican is correct if that it is not generous and/or is a kind of a ephah does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pussley does not rear Mexican.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__