the screenwriter is unoriginal.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the valedictorian is a Eocene is incorrect is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the pussy-paw is not penumbral is correct. sent3: the fact that either the valedictorian is not a rag or it is penumbral or both is not right. sent4: the pussy-paw is a calamint but it is not penumbral if it does finalize screenwriter. sent5: that the pussley is not a rag and it is not a Eocene does not hold if the screenwriter sweats. sent6: the pussley sweats. sent7: the valedictorian is not a kind of a Ecuadorian. sent8: if the fact that the valedictorian is not a calamint and not penumbral does not hold then the fact that the screenwriter is not unoriginal is not incorrect. sent9: if either the pussley does not finalize HDL or it is a Ecuadorian or both the pussy-paw is a Eocene. sent10: if the pussley either is not a sweat or is a rag or both the pussy-paw finalizes HDL. sent11: if the pussy-paw finalizes HDL then that the valedictorian is not a kind of a calamint but it is penumbral is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the valedictorian is both not a calamint and penumbral does not hold. sent13: the pussley is a sweat or a rag or both. sent14: if the pussley does not sweat then the pussy-paw finalizes HDL. sent15: the pussley is not a Eocene if that it is either a sweat or a rag or both is not right. sent16: the fact that if the valedictorian is not non-penumbral the screenwriter is not unoriginal is not false. sent17: if the pussley is not a Eocene the fact that it is not a Ecuadorian hold. sent18: if the pussy-paw finalizes HDL then the fact that the valedictorian is not a kind of a calamint and is not penumbral does not hold. sent19: the fact that if that the pussley is not the sweat or does rag or both does not hold then the pussley is not a kind of a Eocene is not false. sent20: something that is a kind of a calamint that is not penumbral does not finalize HDL. sent21: the pussley is Ecuadorian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the pussley does not sweat and/or does rag is true does not hold.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the pussley is not a kind of a Eocene.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the pussley is not a kind of a Ecuadorian.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the pussley is not a sweat and/or is a rag.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the pussy-paw does finalize HDL.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the fact that the valedictorian is not a kind of a calamint and it is not penumbral does not hold.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the screenwriter is unoriginal.
sent20 -> int7: if the pussy-paw is a calamint and non-penumbral then it does not finalize HDL.;
$hypothesis$ = the screenwriter is unoriginal. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the valedictorian is a Eocene is incorrect is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the pussy-paw is not penumbral is correct. sent3: the fact that either the valedictorian is not a rag or it is penumbral or both is not right. sent4: the pussy-paw is a calamint but it is not penumbral if it does finalize screenwriter. sent5: that the pussley is not a rag and it is not a Eocene does not hold if the screenwriter sweats. sent6: the pussley sweats. sent7: the valedictorian is not a kind of a Ecuadorian. sent8: if the fact that the valedictorian is not a calamint and not penumbral does not hold then the fact that the screenwriter is not unoriginal is not incorrect. sent9: if either the pussley does not finalize HDL or it is a Ecuadorian or both the pussy-paw is a Eocene. sent10: if the pussley either is not a sweat or is a rag or both the pussy-paw finalizes HDL. sent11: if the pussy-paw finalizes HDL then that the valedictorian is not a kind of a calamint but it is penumbral is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the valedictorian is both not a calamint and penumbral does not hold. sent13: the pussley is a sweat or a rag or both. sent14: if the pussley does not sweat then the pussy-paw finalizes HDL. sent15: the pussley is not a Eocene if that it is either a sweat or a rag or both is not right. sent16: the fact that if the valedictorian is not non-penumbral the screenwriter is not unoriginal is not false. sent17: if the pussley is not a Eocene the fact that it is not a Ecuadorian hold. sent18: if the pussy-paw finalizes HDL then the fact that the valedictorian is not a kind of a calamint and is not penumbral does not hold. sent19: the fact that if that the pussley is not the sweat or does rag or both does not hold then the pussley is not a kind of a Eocene is not false. sent20: something that is a kind of a calamint that is not penumbral does not finalize HDL. sent21: the pussley is Ecuadorian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the pussley does not sweat and/or does rag is true does not hold.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the pussley is not a kind of a Eocene.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the pussley is not a kind of a Ecuadorian.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the pussley is not a sweat and/or is a rag.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the pussy-paw does finalize HDL.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the fact that the valedictorian is not a kind of a calamint and it is not penumbral does not hold.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__