the respecting does not occur.
sent1: that the unpriestliness does not occur hold. sent2: the fact that that the unpriestliness does not occur and the follies does not occur is false is not incorrect if the egoisticness does not occur. sent3: the respect does not occur if that the tooling experimentalism does not occur and the egoisticness does not occur is false. sent4: the fact that not the tooling experimentalism but the egoisticness occurs is false. sent5: that both the tooling experimentalism and the non-egoisticness occurs is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tooling experimentalism does not occur and the egoisticness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the egoisticness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the unpriestliness does not occur and the follies does not occur is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the respecting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the unpriestliness does not occur hold. sent2: the fact that that the unpriestliness does not occur and the follies does not occur is false is not incorrect if the egoisticness does not occur. sent3: the respect does not occur if that the tooling experimentalism does not occur and the egoisticness does not occur is false. sent4: the fact that not the tooling experimentalism but the egoisticness occurs is false. sent5: that both the tooling experimentalism and the non-egoisticness occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tooling experimentalism does not occur and the egoisticness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the egoisticness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the unpriestliness does not occur and the follies does not occur is false.; __UNKNOWN__