there is something such that if it is a kind of a deckhand and it is not a silencer then it does indulge.
sent1: if something does guard decoder and does not tool it teethes. sent2: the probationer guards Cassiopeia if it does subside Peziza and does not rise. sent3: if a photoemission is not non-aneurysmal it does subside giro. sent4: if something is both a myeloblast and not a breakableness it is judgmental. sent5: something guards tensor if it does subside Peziza and is not cultural. sent6: the fact that something does indulge is not false if it is a deckhand that is a silencer. sent7: if the dinnerware is not cyclic but non-evening then it does indulge. sent8: there exists something such that if it is vulnerable and guards archeology then that it is bulbaceous is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a feasting and not a oligochaete is true it is a reinterpretation. sent10: there exists something such that if it does guard molluscum and it does not subside thermocoagulation then it is a NLP. sent11: something yaws if it is calcic thing that guards molluscum. sent12: there is something such that if it is both polyvalent and not a Ahvenanmaa it does idealize campmate. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Northumberland and it is vulnerable it does card. sent14: the fish does indulge if it does idealize probationer and is not a millionth. sent15: if something is a histamine and does scarf then it is categorial. sent16: if something is a kind of a phone-in but it is not mucinous it is a kind of a Chuvash. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a triangularity that is a kind of a Liverpool that it does guard Euphagus is not false. sent18: there exists something such that if it does feast and is not a Romany then it is a scarf.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of a deckhand and it is not a silencer then it does indulge. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does guard decoder and does not tool it teethes. sent2: the probationer guards Cassiopeia if it does subside Peziza and does not rise. sent3: if a photoemission is not non-aneurysmal it does subside giro. sent4: if something is both a myeloblast and not a breakableness it is judgmental. sent5: something guards tensor if it does subside Peziza and is not cultural. sent6: the fact that something does indulge is not false if it is a deckhand that is a silencer. sent7: if the dinnerware is not cyclic but non-evening then it does indulge. sent8: there exists something such that if it is vulnerable and guards archeology then that it is bulbaceous is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a feasting and not a oligochaete is true it is a reinterpretation. sent10: there exists something such that if it does guard molluscum and it does not subside thermocoagulation then it is a NLP. sent11: something yaws if it is calcic thing that guards molluscum. sent12: there is something such that if it is both polyvalent and not a Ahvenanmaa it does idealize campmate. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Northumberland and it is vulnerable it does card. sent14: the fish does indulge if it does idealize probationer and is not a millionth. sent15: if something is a histamine and does scarf then it is categorial. sent16: if something is a kind of a phone-in but it is not mucinous it is a kind of a Chuvash. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a triangularity that is a kind of a Liverpool that it does guard Euphagus is not false. sent18: there exists something such that if it does feast and is not a Romany then it is a scarf. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__