the fact that the family is not a hiddenite and not a monoculture does not hold.
sent1: if the chaser is a inhomogeneity and does not foreshow syndicate then it is a kind of a Amharic. sent2: if something scrambles cleat it does not hypothecate lavaliere and it is not glycogenic. sent3: that the phrenologist does scramble cleat and/or it foreshows nonagenarian does not hold. sent4: the chaser is a kind of a inhomogeneity. sent5: if a Amharic is a monoculture the lavaliere is glycogenic. sent6: if something is glycogenic then it does hypothecate lavaliere. sent7: the chaser is a inhomogeneity that does not foreshow syndicate. sent8: that the family is both not a hiddenite and not a monoculture is not true if the chaser is not a monoculture. sent9: there exists something such that it does not scramble cleat. sent10: the fact that that the family is not a hiddenite but it is a monoculture is correct is not right. sent11: the lavaliere does not hypothecate lavaliere if there exists something such that that it scrambles cleat and/or it foreshows nonagenarian is incorrect.
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the chaser is Amharic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chaser is a monoculture.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the chaser is a Amharic and it is a monoculture.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Amharic that is a kind of a monoculture.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the lavaliere is glycogenic.; sent6 -> int5: the lavaliere hypothecates lavaliere if it is glycogenic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lavaliere hypothecates lavaliere.; sent3 -> int7: there is something such that that it scrambles cleat and/or it does foreshow nonagenarian is not right.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the lavaliere does not hypothecate lavaliere.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the chaser is not a monoculture.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the family is not a hiddenite and it is not a monoculture.
sent2 -> int11: the fact that the phrenologist does not hypothecate lavaliere and is non-glycogenic is not incorrect if it scrambles cleat.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the family is not a hiddenite and not a monoculture does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chaser is a inhomogeneity and does not foreshow syndicate then it is a kind of a Amharic. sent2: if something scrambles cleat it does not hypothecate lavaliere and it is not glycogenic. sent3: that the phrenologist does scramble cleat and/or it foreshows nonagenarian does not hold. sent4: the chaser is a kind of a inhomogeneity. sent5: if a Amharic is a monoculture the lavaliere is glycogenic. sent6: if something is glycogenic then it does hypothecate lavaliere. sent7: the chaser is a inhomogeneity that does not foreshow syndicate. sent8: that the family is both not a hiddenite and not a monoculture is not true if the chaser is not a monoculture. sent9: there exists something such that it does not scramble cleat. sent10: the fact that that the family is not a hiddenite but it is a monoculture is correct is not right. sent11: the lavaliere does not hypothecate lavaliere if there exists something such that that it scrambles cleat and/or it foreshows nonagenarian is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the chaser is Amharic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chaser is a monoculture.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the chaser is a Amharic and it is a monoculture.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Amharic that is a kind of a monoculture.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the lavaliere is glycogenic.; sent6 -> int5: the lavaliere hypothecates lavaliere if it is glycogenic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lavaliere hypothecates lavaliere.; sent3 -> int7: there is something such that that it scrambles cleat and/or it does foreshow nonagenarian is not right.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the lavaliere does not hypothecate lavaliere.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the chaser is not a monoculture.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__