the tulip is a naphazoline.
sent1: the sidesman is a naphazoline if something either lobs sidesman or is estrous or both. sent2: if something is estrous and/or it is news the mower lobs diemaker. sent3: that the dudeen is not bicipital and it does not lob sidesman does not hold if the tulip is not a naphazoline. sent4: that the dudeen is not bicipital but it does lob sidesman is incorrect if the tulip is not a naphazoline. sent5: that the dudeen is not bicipital but it lobs sidesman is incorrect. sent6: everything is not a kind of an ally. sent7: if the mower does not froth that the sidesman does lob Chad but it does not lob diemaker does not hold. sent8: the mower is not news. sent9: The diemaker does not lob mower. sent10: if the sidesman is not bicipital then the fact that the mower does not lob diemaker but it is news is false. sent11: the mower does not lob diemaker. sent12: if there exists something such that it lobs sidesman and/or it does lob diemaker then the mower is a naphazoline. sent13: if something does not froth the sidesman lobs Chad and/or it is news. sent14: the sidesman is estrous if the dudeen does lob sidesman. sent15: if the tulip is news the fact that the dudeen is both a naphazoline and not estrous is not correct. sent16: if there is something such that that it is bicipital is right then the dudeen is a terminal. sent17: something does not froth if that it does not lob mower and it does froth does not hold. sent18: if the sidesman is news then the tulip is news. sent19: that the tulip bans swiftlet is true. sent20: if that the sidesman lobs Chad and does not lob diemaker is incorrect the dudeen is news. sent21: there is something such that it is estrous and/or it does lob diemaker. sent22: the fact that something is a kind of a static and it does lob mower is incorrect if that it does not ally is not false. sent23: the tulip is bicipital if there exists something such that either it is a kind of a naphazoline or it lobs diemaker or both. sent24: if the dudeen does not lob diemaker then that the mower is not bicipital and it is not a naphazoline does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tulip is not a naphazoline.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the dudeen is not bicipital and it does not lob sidesman is false.;
the dudeen does lob diemaker.
sent22 -> int2: if the leftfield is not an ally then that it is static and lobs mower is not true.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the leftfield is not a kind of an ally hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the leftfield is a kind of a static and it does lob mower is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is nothing that is a kind of static thing that does lob mower.; int5 -> int6: that the mower is a static and it does lob mower does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the tulip is a naphazoline. ; $context$ = sent1: the sidesman is a naphazoline if something either lobs sidesman or is estrous or both. sent2: if something is estrous and/or it is news the mower lobs diemaker. sent3: that the dudeen is not bicipital and it does not lob sidesman does not hold if the tulip is not a naphazoline. sent4: that the dudeen is not bicipital but it does lob sidesman is incorrect if the tulip is not a naphazoline. sent5: that the dudeen is not bicipital but it lobs sidesman is incorrect. sent6: everything is not a kind of an ally. sent7: if the mower does not froth that the sidesman does lob Chad but it does not lob diemaker does not hold. sent8: the mower is not news. sent9: The diemaker does not lob mower. sent10: if the sidesman is not bicipital then the fact that the mower does not lob diemaker but it is news is false. sent11: the mower does not lob diemaker. sent12: if there exists something such that it lobs sidesman and/or it does lob diemaker then the mower is a naphazoline. sent13: if something does not froth the sidesman lobs Chad and/or it is news. sent14: the sidesman is estrous if the dudeen does lob sidesman. sent15: if the tulip is news the fact that the dudeen is both a naphazoline and not estrous is not correct. sent16: if there is something such that that it is bicipital is right then the dudeen is a terminal. sent17: something does not froth if that it does not lob mower and it does froth does not hold. sent18: if the sidesman is news then the tulip is news. sent19: that the tulip bans swiftlet is true. sent20: if that the sidesman lobs Chad and does not lob diemaker is incorrect the dudeen is news. sent21: there is something such that it is estrous and/or it does lob diemaker. sent22: the fact that something is a kind of a static and it does lob mower is incorrect if that it does not ally is not false. sent23: the tulip is bicipital if there exists something such that either it is a kind of a naphazoline or it lobs diemaker or both. sent24: if the dudeen does not lob diemaker then that the mower is not bicipital and it is not a naphazoline does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tulip is not a naphazoline.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the dudeen is not bicipital and it does not lob sidesman is false.; __UNKNOWN__