the stationery does not clank exogamy.
sent1: the director does not clank Judaism. sent2: if something is not a kind of a conductor then it is not a maser. sent3: a non-removable thing consorts director and is not a Anglican. sent4: if the emir is both not wiry and not removable the keelboat is removable. sent5: if the carbine is not a SLE the fact that it is a kind of bronchoscopic thing that is a kind of a vancomycin does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the director is not a cuspidation and is a hollandaise is not true then the edger is not a hollandaise. sent7: something is not wiry and it is not removable if it is not a maser. sent8: the carbine is imprecise. sent9: if something does not clank Judaism that it is not a cuspidation and it is a hollandaise is not true. sent10: if the carbine is not a SLE the fact that it is both bronchoscopic and not a vancomycin is not correct. sent11: if the keelboat does consort director then that the fact that the carbine is a kind of a SLE but it is not imprecise is not wrong is false. sent12: if the fact that the carbine is imprecise hold then it is bronchoscopic and is not a vancomycin. sent13: if the edger is not a hollandaise then that it does clank Princeton and it is not a conductor is wrong. sent14: if the carbine is a kind of a SLE the stationery does clank exogamy. sent15: if the fact that the edger clanks Princeton and is not a kind of a conductor is false the emir is not a kind of a conductor.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carbine is not a SLE.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the carbine is bronchoscopic but not a vancomycin is false.; sent12 & sent8 -> int2: the carbine is bronchoscopic and is not a vancomycin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the carbine is a kind of a SLE.; int4 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the stationery does not clank exogamy.
sent3 -> int5: the keelboat does consort director and is not a kind of a Anglican if that it is not removable is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int6: if the fact that the emir is not a kind of a maser is not false it is not wiry but irremovable.; sent2 -> int7: that the emir is not a kind of a maser hold if it is not a conductor.; sent9 -> int8: if the director does not clank Judaism that it is not a cuspidation and it is a hollandaise does not hold.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the fact that the director is not a kind of a cuspidation but it is a hollandaise is wrong.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the edger is not a kind of a hollandaise.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: that the fact that the edger clanks Princeton and is not a kind of a conductor is incorrect hold.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the emir is not a conductor.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the emir is not a kind of a maser.; int6 & int13 -> int14: the emir is not wiry and it is not removable.; sent4 & int14 -> int15: the keelboat is not removable.; int5 & int15 -> int16: the keelboat consorts director and is not a kind of a Anglican.; int16 -> int17: the keelboat does consort director.; sent11 & int17 -> int18: that that the carbine is a kind of a SLE and is not imprecise is not right is not wrong.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that the fact that it is a SLE and it is not imprecise is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the stationery does not clank exogamy. ; $context$ = sent1: the director does not clank Judaism. sent2: if something is not a kind of a conductor then it is not a maser. sent3: a non-removable thing consorts director and is not a Anglican. sent4: if the emir is both not wiry and not removable the keelboat is removable. sent5: if the carbine is not a SLE the fact that it is a kind of bronchoscopic thing that is a kind of a vancomycin does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the director is not a cuspidation and is a hollandaise is not true then the edger is not a hollandaise. sent7: something is not wiry and it is not removable if it is not a maser. sent8: the carbine is imprecise. sent9: if something does not clank Judaism that it is not a cuspidation and it is a hollandaise is not true. sent10: if the carbine is not a SLE the fact that it is both bronchoscopic and not a vancomycin is not correct. sent11: if the keelboat does consort director then that the fact that the carbine is a kind of a SLE but it is not imprecise is not wrong is false. sent12: if the fact that the carbine is imprecise hold then it is bronchoscopic and is not a vancomycin. sent13: if the edger is not a hollandaise then that it does clank Princeton and it is not a conductor is wrong. sent14: if the carbine is a kind of a SLE the stationery does clank exogamy. sent15: if the fact that the edger clanks Princeton and is not a kind of a conductor is false the emir is not a kind of a conductor. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carbine is not a SLE.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the carbine is bronchoscopic but not a vancomycin is false.; sent12 & sent8 -> int2: the carbine is bronchoscopic and is not a vancomycin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the carbine is a kind of a SLE.; int4 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__