the fact that there is something such that if it does block coir then that it does not flame and it is not a kind of a Cockney does not hold does not hold.
sent1: that the employee does not flame and is Cockney does not hold if it blocks coir. sent2: there is something such that if it does block coir then it does not flame and it is not a kind of a Cockney. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does block coir is true then the fact that it does not flame and is a Cockney is not correct. sent4: the fact that something flames and is not a Cockney is wrong if it does block coir. sent5: the fact that something does not flame but it is a kind of a Cockney does not hold if it blocks coir. sent6: if something does block coir the fact that it does not flame and is not a Cockney does not hold. sent7: that the employee flames and is not a Cockney does not hold if it blocks coir. sent8: the employee does not flame and it is not Cockney if it blocks coir. sent9: there exists something such that if it does block coir then that it does flame and is non-Cockney is incorrect. sent10: something that does block coir does not flame and is not a Cockney.
sent6 -> int1: if the employee does block coir that it does not flame and is non-Cockney is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does block coir then that it does not flame and it is not a kind of a Cockney does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the employee does not flame and is Cockney does not hold if it blocks coir. sent2: there is something such that if it does block coir then it does not flame and it is not a kind of a Cockney. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does block coir is true then the fact that it does not flame and is a Cockney is not correct. sent4: the fact that something flames and is not a Cockney is wrong if it does block coir. sent5: the fact that something does not flame but it is a kind of a Cockney does not hold if it blocks coir. sent6: if something does block coir the fact that it does not flame and is not a Cockney does not hold. sent7: that the employee flames and is not a Cockney does not hold if it blocks coir. sent8: the employee does not flame and it is not Cockney if it blocks coir. sent9: there exists something such that if it does block coir then that it does flame and is non-Cockney is incorrect. sent10: something that does block coir does not flame and is not a Cockney. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the employee does block coir that it does not flame and is non-Cockney is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__