if the brazening putty happens then the brazening Philip does not occur but the quacking occurs.
sent1: the quacking and the overriding inhibitor occurs if the bibliographicness does not occur. sent2: that the bibliographicness does not occur is true. sent3: if the quacking does not occur the brazening Philip does not occur and the brazening putty happens. sent4: the overriding inhibitor happens if the bibliographicness does not occur. sent5: if the nonunionness happens then the fact that the bibliographicness does not occur and the overriding inhibitor happens does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the bibliographicness does not occur but the overriding inhibitor happens is wrong then the quacking does not occur. sent7: the lexicostatisticsness or the maxillodentalness or both happens if the benzenoidness does not occur. sent8: if not the slap but the reverseness occurs then the brazening putty does not occur. sent9: if the brazening Philip happens then not the slap but the reverse happens. sent10: if not the brazening Philip but the brazening putty happens then the doctoring does not occur. sent11: the Fijian does not occur. sent12: the reverseness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brazening Philip happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the slapping does not occur but the reverse occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the brazening putty does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the brazening putty happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the brazening Philip does not occur.; sent1 & sent2 -> int5: the quack occurs and the overriding inhibitor occurs.; int5 -> int6: the quack occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: not the brazening Philip but the quack happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the doctoring does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the brazening putty happens then the brazening Philip does not occur but the quacking occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the quacking and the overriding inhibitor occurs if the bibliographicness does not occur. sent2: that the bibliographicness does not occur is true. sent3: if the quacking does not occur the brazening Philip does not occur and the brazening putty happens. sent4: the overriding inhibitor happens if the bibliographicness does not occur. sent5: if the nonunionness happens then the fact that the bibliographicness does not occur and the overriding inhibitor happens does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the bibliographicness does not occur but the overriding inhibitor happens is wrong then the quacking does not occur. sent7: the lexicostatisticsness or the maxillodentalness or both happens if the benzenoidness does not occur. sent8: if not the slap but the reverseness occurs then the brazening putty does not occur. sent9: if the brazening Philip happens then not the slap but the reverse happens. sent10: if not the brazening Philip but the brazening putty happens then the doctoring does not occur. sent11: the Fijian does not occur. sent12: the reverseness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brazening Philip happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the slapping does not occur but the reverse occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the brazening putty does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the brazening putty happens.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the brazening Philip does not occur.; sent1 & sent2 -> int5: the quack occurs and the overriding inhibitor occurs.; int5 -> int6: the quack occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: not the brazening Philip but the quack happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__