the bestirring dispensation does not occur.
sent1: that the rugby does not occur but the hollowness happens is brought about by that the mastership happens. sent2: if the fact that the dismount but not the sedimenting happens is not right then the dismount does not occur. sent3: if the arthromericness does not occur then the fact that the dismount occurs and the sedimenting does not occur is incorrect. sent4: that the arthromericness does not occur leads to that the dismount happens and the sediment occurs. sent5: the fact that the accession does not occur is true if the fact that that the lash does not occur or the flex occurs or both does not hold is correct. sent6: the felicitousness happens and the liquefying addict happens. sent7: the arthromericness does not occur and the reimposition does not occur if the accessioning does not occur. sent8: the fact that the lash does not occur and/or the flexing happens does not hold if the palpableness does not occur. sent9: that the bestirring dispensation and the felicitousness happens is triggered by that the liquefying addict does not occur. sent10: that the bestirring dispensation does not occur is triggered by that the felicitousness occurs and the kindling happens. sent11: the palpableness does not occur if that the non-welcomeness or the declamation or both occurs is incorrect. sent12: that both the inconvertibleness and the felicitousness happens is brought about by that the liquefying addict does not occur. sent13: the mastership is caused by that not the rite but the stooging happens. sent14: not the rite but the stooging happens if the floralness happens. sent15: the fact that the sedimenting does not occur and the dismount does not occur is incorrect. sent16: if the rugby does not occur then the fact that either the welcoming does not occur or the declamation happens or both does not hold. sent17: the bestirring dispensation happens if the dismount occurs.
sent6 -> int1: the felicitousness happens.;
the bestirring dispensation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the bestirring dispensation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the rugby does not occur but the hollowness happens is brought about by that the mastership happens. sent2: if the fact that the dismount but not the sedimenting happens is not right then the dismount does not occur. sent3: if the arthromericness does not occur then the fact that the dismount occurs and the sedimenting does not occur is incorrect. sent4: that the arthromericness does not occur leads to that the dismount happens and the sediment occurs. sent5: the fact that the accession does not occur is true if the fact that that the lash does not occur or the flex occurs or both does not hold is correct. sent6: the felicitousness happens and the liquefying addict happens. sent7: the arthromericness does not occur and the reimposition does not occur if the accessioning does not occur. sent8: the fact that the lash does not occur and/or the flexing happens does not hold if the palpableness does not occur. sent9: that the bestirring dispensation and the felicitousness happens is triggered by that the liquefying addict does not occur. sent10: that the bestirring dispensation does not occur is triggered by that the felicitousness occurs and the kindling happens. sent11: the palpableness does not occur if that the non-welcomeness or the declamation or both occurs is incorrect. sent12: that both the inconvertibleness and the felicitousness happens is brought about by that the liquefying addict does not occur. sent13: the mastership is caused by that not the rite but the stooging happens. sent14: not the rite but the stooging happens if the floralness happens. sent15: the fact that the sedimenting does not occur and the dismount does not occur is incorrect. sent16: if the rugby does not occur then the fact that either the welcoming does not occur or the declamation happens or both does not hold. sent17: the bestirring dispensation happens if the dismount occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the felicitousness happens.; __UNKNOWN__