that that that the chlorophyll is the headstall and does not mark aptitude is true is incorrect if the chlorophyll is a kind of a triclinium is not true.
sent1: if the chlorophyll chain-smokes the fact that it does mark aptitude and is not a wheatfield does not hold. sent2: the chlorophyll is a headstall but it does not mark aptitude if the fact that it is a triclinium is not incorrect. sent3: if something is a pentagon then the fact that it is both a ready and not a tincture is wrong. sent4: if something does marshal Capreolus the fact that it decrees and it is not a ICC is not true. sent5: if something is textual that it is ducal and does not glamorize is incorrect. sent6: if the chlorophyll is a kind of a triclinium the fact that it is a headstall and does mark aptitude is wrong. sent7: that something is a kind of a headstall and does mark aptitude is not correct if it is a triclinium. sent8: if something preoccupies Yquem the fact that it is a ICC that is not a parachute does not hold. sent9: the fact that the chlorophyll absorbs but it does not outride is incorrect if it is an executor. sent10: that something is a kind of a headstall that does not mark aptitude is not correct if it is a triclinium. sent11: if that something is a marlberry is true that it is a triclinium and it does not pluck spar is incorrect. sent12: if something is a triclinium it is a kind of a headstall that does not mark aptitude. sent13: if something is binocular that it is a metropolitan and it does not mark aptitude is wrong.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the tollgate is a kind of a metropolitan and does not mark aptitude is not right if it is binocular.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that that the chlorophyll is the headstall and does not mark aptitude is true is incorrect if the chlorophyll is a kind of a triclinium is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chlorophyll chain-smokes the fact that it does mark aptitude and is not a wheatfield does not hold. sent2: the chlorophyll is a headstall but it does not mark aptitude if the fact that it is a triclinium is not incorrect. sent3: if something is a pentagon then the fact that it is both a ready and not a tincture is wrong. sent4: if something does marshal Capreolus the fact that it decrees and it is not a ICC is not true. sent5: if something is textual that it is ducal and does not glamorize is incorrect. sent6: if the chlorophyll is a kind of a triclinium the fact that it is a headstall and does mark aptitude is wrong. sent7: that something is a kind of a headstall and does mark aptitude is not correct if it is a triclinium. sent8: if something preoccupies Yquem the fact that it is a ICC that is not a parachute does not hold. sent9: the fact that the chlorophyll absorbs but it does not outride is incorrect if it is an executor. sent10: that something is a kind of a headstall that does not mark aptitude is not correct if it is a triclinium. sent11: if that something is a marlberry is true that it is a triclinium and it does not pluck spar is incorrect. sent12: if something is a triclinium it is a kind of a headstall that does not mark aptitude. sent13: if something is binocular that it is a metropolitan and it does not mark aptitude is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__