the interreflection is not a kind of a stoic.
sent1: if the fact that something does not progress and/or is not sudden is not true then the fact that it is a gibibit is right. sent2: that the epicardia is closed-circuit but it does not spectate Talinum does not hold. sent3: if the epicardia is non-closed-circuit and it does not spectate Talinum the ampulla does not progress. sent4: if something is not sudden then it does not wean nilgai and is not a progress. sent5: something is a kind of a stoic if it is near. sent6: the interreflection is forceless if that it weans nilgai or is not a kind of a gibibit or both does not hold. sent7: something that is either not Guatemalan or a gibibit or both is not a stoic. sent8: the clinker is not non-near if there is something such that that it is non-closed-circuit thing that does not spectate Talinum is incorrect. sent9: the ampulla does not progress if the epicardia is closed-circuit thing that does not spectate Talinum. sent10: the fact that the gloriosa is a avadavat and/or it is a motorcycle does not hold if it is not forceless. sent11: if the fact that something does spectate clinker and/or it is unprovocative is wrong the fact that it does not spectate Aachen hold. sent12: if the fact that the interreflection is not a progress or it is sudden or both is incorrect then the fact that it is a gibibit is true. sent13: that the ampulla is a kind of a nonagenarian is not wrong. sent14: the gloriosa does wean nilgai if the clinker is near. sent15: the fact that the epicardia is non-closed-circuit thing that spectates Talinum does not hold. sent16: the gloriosa is not a kind of a motorcycle. sent17: the gloriosa is not forceless. sent18: if that either something is a kind of a avadavat or it is a motorcycle or both is incorrect it does not wean nilgai.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the epicardia is non-closed-circuit thing that does not spectate Talinum is true is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not closed-circuit and it does not spectate Talinum is not right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the clinker is near.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the gloriosa does wean nilgai.; sent18 -> int4: if that the gloriosa is a avadavat and/or is a motorcycle is wrong then it does not wean nilgai.; sent10 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that that either the gloriosa is a avadavat or it is a motorcycle or both is right does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gloriosa does not wean nilgai.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the epicardia is non-closed-circuit and does not spectate Talinum.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the ampulla is not a progress.; sent1 -> int10: if that either the interreflection is not a progress or it is not sudden or both is not true then it is a kind of a gibibit.; sent7 -> int11: if either the interreflection is not a kind of a Guatemalan or it is a kind of a gibibit or both then that it is not a kind of a stoic is correct.;
that either the lerot is not a gibibit or it is not a kind of a Catullus or both is false.
sent4 -> int12: if the gloriosa is not sudden then it does not wean nilgai and is not a progress.;
$hypothesis$ = the interreflection is not a kind of a stoic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not progress and/or is not sudden is not true then the fact that it is a gibibit is right. sent2: that the epicardia is closed-circuit but it does not spectate Talinum does not hold. sent3: if the epicardia is non-closed-circuit and it does not spectate Talinum the ampulla does not progress. sent4: if something is not sudden then it does not wean nilgai and is not a progress. sent5: something is a kind of a stoic if it is near. sent6: the interreflection is forceless if that it weans nilgai or is not a kind of a gibibit or both does not hold. sent7: something that is either not Guatemalan or a gibibit or both is not a stoic. sent8: the clinker is not non-near if there is something such that that it is non-closed-circuit thing that does not spectate Talinum is incorrect. sent9: the ampulla does not progress if the epicardia is closed-circuit thing that does not spectate Talinum. sent10: the fact that the gloriosa is a avadavat and/or it is a motorcycle does not hold if it is not forceless. sent11: if the fact that something does spectate clinker and/or it is unprovocative is wrong the fact that it does not spectate Aachen hold. sent12: if the fact that the interreflection is not a progress or it is sudden or both is incorrect then the fact that it is a gibibit is true. sent13: that the ampulla is a kind of a nonagenarian is not wrong. sent14: the gloriosa does wean nilgai if the clinker is near. sent15: the fact that the epicardia is non-closed-circuit thing that spectates Talinum does not hold. sent16: the gloriosa is not a kind of a motorcycle. sent17: the gloriosa is not forceless. sent18: if that either something is a kind of a avadavat or it is a motorcycle or both is incorrect it does not wean nilgai. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the epicardia is non-closed-circuit thing that does not spectate Talinum is true is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not closed-circuit and it does not spectate Talinum is not right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the clinker is near.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the gloriosa does wean nilgai.; sent18 -> int4: if that the gloriosa is a avadavat and/or is a motorcycle is wrong then it does not wean nilgai.; sent10 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that that either the gloriosa is a avadavat or it is a motorcycle or both is right does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gloriosa does not wean nilgai.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the epicardia is non-closed-circuit and does not spectate Talinum.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the ampulla is not a progress.; sent1 -> int10: if that either the interreflection is not a progress or it is not sudden or both is not true then it is a kind of a gibibit.; sent7 -> int11: if either the interreflection is not a kind of a Guatemalan or it is a kind of a gibibit or both then that it is not a kind of a stoic is correct.; __UNKNOWN__