that the fact that something quintuples dirge and is not a swami is not wrong is false.
sent1: if something does teeter it is not a facade. sent2: the snoop does not teeter. sent3: the grenade does quintuple dirge. sent4: the snoop is a kind of a facade. sent5: that the snoop is not a phase-out and does teeter is not right. sent6: if the snoop is not a kind of a phase-out and it does not teeter then the grenade is not a kind of an engineering. sent7: the grenade quintuples dirge but it is not a swami if it does not engineer. sent8: if the fact that something is not a phase-out and does not teeter is not correct it is not a facade.
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the snoop is not a phase-out and it does not teeter is not true then it is not a facade.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the snoop is not a phase-out and does not teeter does not hold is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the snoop is not a facade.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the snoop is not a phase-out and it does not teeter.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the grenade is not an engineering is not incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the grenade quintuples dirge but it is not a swami.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that something quintuples dirge and is not a swami is not wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does teeter it is not a facade. sent2: the snoop does not teeter. sent3: the grenade does quintuple dirge. sent4: the snoop is a kind of a facade. sent5: that the snoop is not a phase-out and does teeter is not right. sent6: if the snoop is not a kind of a phase-out and it does not teeter then the grenade is not a kind of an engineering. sent7: the grenade quintuples dirge but it is not a swami if it does not engineer. sent8: if the fact that something is not a phase-out and does not teeter is not correct it is not a facade. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the snoop is not a phase-out and it does not teeter is not true then it is not a facade.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the snoop is not a phase-out and does not teeter does not hold is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the snoop is not a facade.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the snoop is not a phase-out and it does not teeter.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the grenade is not an engineering is not incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the grenade quintuples dirge but it is not a swami.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__