the voyage does not occur and the contributing pseudoscorpion does not occur.
sent1: the non-indigestibleness and the coaching happens. sent2: that both the setup and the deployment happens prevents that the anorectalness occurs. sent3: the endorsement occurs. sent4: the non-mioticness and the non-backedness occurs. sent5: the non-masonicness results in that the non-protectiveness and the Europeanness happens. sent6: if the fabianness does not occur the endorsement does not occur and the simulation happens. sent7: if the fabianness and the contributing chambray occurs then the voyaging does not occur. sent8: if that the fact that the aceticness does not occur and the headshake does not occur is correct does not hold the contributing chambray occurs. sent9: the fact that both the non-nonpartisanness and the infallibleness occurs is not false. sent10: the fact that the specialisticness occurs but the runup does not occur does not hold. sent11: the contributing paraprofessional happens if the contributing Belonidae happens. sent12: the seven-up happens. sent13: the dyslexicness does not occur. sent14: if the contributing plastique occurs then the grapevine happens. sent15: the fact that the contributing pseudoscorpion does not occur is not false. sent16: the fact that the aceticness does not occur and the headshake does not occur is wrong. sent17: the Pakistaniness does not occur. sent18: the unpriestliness does not occur. sent19: the indigestibleness does not occur. sent20: the contributing mignonette does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fabianness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the endorsement does not occur but the simulation happens.; int1 -> int2: the endorsement does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fabianness occurs.; sent8 & sent16 -> int5: the contributing chambray happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fabianness occurs and the contributing chambray occurs.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the voyaging does not occur hold.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the voyage does not occur and the contributing pseudoscorpion does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-indigestibleness and the coaching happens. sent2: that both the setup and the deployment happens prevents that the anorectalness occurs. sent3: the endorsement occurs. sent4: the non-mioticness and the non-backedness occurs. sent5: the non-masonicness results in that the non-protectiveness and the Europeanness happens. sent6: if the fabianness does not occur the endorsement does not occur and the simulation happens. sent7: if the fabianness and the contributing chambray occurs then the voyaging does not occur. sent8: if that the fact that the aceticness does not occur and the headshake does not occur is correct does not hold the contributing chambray occurs. sent9: the fact that both the non-nonpartisanness and the infallibleness occurs is not false. sent10: the fact that the specialisticness occurs but the runup does not occur does not hold. sent11: the contributing paraprofessional happens if the contributing Belonidae happens. sent12: the seven-up happens. sent13: the dyslexicness does not occur. sent14: if the contributing plastique occurs then the grapevine happens. sent15: the fact that the contributing pseudoscorpion does not occur is not false. sent16: the fact that the aceticness does not occur and the headshake does not occur is wrong. sent17: the Pakistaniness does not occur. sent18: the unpriestliness does not occur. sent19: the indigestibleness does not occur. sent20: the contributing mignonette does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fabianness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the endorsement does not occur but the simulation happens.; int1 -> int2: the endorsement does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fabianness occurs.; sent8 & sent16 -> int5: the contributing chambray happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fabianness occurs and the contributing chambray occurs.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the voyaging does not occur hold.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__