the fact that the colliery is daisylike and it does confine Scotland does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the dacryocyst does prioritize basic does not hold then the deoxythymidine caramelizes or prioritize basic or both. sent2: the shed loses pantothen if the deoxythymidine does caramelize. sent3: the dacryocyst does not prioritize basic if the glossy is not unmindful and does not persist son-in-law. sent4: if the jumper does not confine Scotland then the colliery is daisylike and confine Scotland. sent5: the fact that the ballroom is irreverent thing that loses pantothen is not true if the shed loses pantothen. sent6: the jumper does not confine Scotland if that the ballroom is a kind of irreverent thing that does lose pantothen does not hold. sent7: the glossy is an extrapolation. sent8: if the deoxythymidine does prioritize basic the shed loses pantothen. sent9: if the glossy is an extrapolation it is a kind of mindful thing that does not persist son-in-law.
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the glossy is mindful thing that does not persist son-in-law.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the dacryocyst does not prioritize basic.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the deoxythymidine either caramelizes or prioritizes basic or both.; int3 & sent2 & sent8 -> int4: the shed does lose pantothen.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the ballroom is not reverent and loses pantothen is not true.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the jumper does not confine Scotland.; sent4 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the colliery is daisylike and it does confine Scotland does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the dacryocyst does prioritize basic does not hold then the deoxythymidine caramelizes or prioritize basic or both. sent2: the shed loses pantothen if the deoxythymidine does caramelize. sent3: the dacryocyst does not prioritize basic if the glossy is not unmindful and does not persist son-in-law. sent4: if the jumper does not confine Scotland then the colliery is daisylike and confine Scotland. sent5: the fact that the ballroom is irreverent thing that loses pantothen is not true if the shed loses pantothen. sent6: the jumper does not confine Scotland if that the ballroom is a kind of irreverent thing that does lose pantothen does not hold. sent7: the glossy is an extrapolation. sent8: if the deoxythymidine does prioritize basic the shed loses pantothen. sent9: if the glossy is an extrapolation it is a kind of mindful thing that does not persist son-in-law. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the glossy is mindful thing that does not persist son-in-law.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the dacryocyst does not prioritize basic.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the deoxythymidine either caramelizes or prioritizes basic or both.; int3 & sent2 & sent8 -> int4: the shed does lose pantothen.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the ballroom is not reverent and loses pantothen is not true.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the jumper does not confine Scotland.; sent4 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__