if the gaslight occurs the Sinitic occurs but the repining carpel does not occur.
sent1: the railroading happens and the condemnation does not occur. sent2: the repining murmuring happens but the brachialness does not occur. sent3: if the gaslight occurs then the Siniticness occurs. sent4: the attentiveness does not occur if that the attentiveness but not the impropriety occurs is not right. sent5: that the attentiveness but not the impropriety occurs is not right if that the abusing occurs hold. sent6: the leaning Aspergillus occurs. sent7: the leaning volume happens and the inking does not occur if the gaslight does not occur. sent8: if the eliminating occurs then that the abusing occurs is right. sent9: if the fact that the attentiveness does not occur is not incorrect then that the enfranchising Tangier does not occur and the leaning detective does not occur is wrong. sent10: the railroad does not occur if the fact that the enfranchising Tangier does not occur and the leaning detective does not occur is not right. sent11: the railroad happens. sent12: that the railroading does not occur prevents that the condemnation happens. sent13: if the railroading happens and the condemnation does not occur the repining carpel does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gaslight happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Siniticness occurs.; sent13 & sent1 -> int2: the repining carpel does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Siniticness occurs but the repining carpel does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the leaning volume happens but the ink does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the gaslight occurs the Sinitic occurs but the repining carpel does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the railroading happens and the condemnation does not occur. sent2: the repining murmuring happens but the brachialness does not occur. sent3: if the gaslight occurs then the Siniticness occurs. sent4: the attentiveness does not occur if that the attentiveness but not the impropriety occurs is not right. sent5: that the attentiveness but not the impropriety occurs is not right if that the abusing occurs hold. sent6: the leaning Aspergillus occurs. sent7: the leaning volume happens and the inking does not occur if the gaslight does not occur. sent8: if the eliminating occurs then that the abusing occurs is right. sent9: if the fact that the attentiveness does not occur is not incorrect then that the enfranchising Tangier does not occur and the leaning detective does not occur is wrong. sent10: the railroad does not occur if the fact that the enfranchising Tangier does not occur and the leaning detective does not occur is not right. sent11: the railroad happens. sent12: that the railroading does not occur prevents that the condemnation happens. sent13: if the railroading happens and the condemnation does not occur the repining carpel does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gaslight happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Siniticness occurs.; sent13 & sent1 -> int2: the repining carpel does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Siniticness occurs but the repining carpel does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__