if the Stalinization is a kind of an individual then the fact that the peanut is not consonantal and it is not feudatory does not hold.
sent1: if the contester is not feudatory the fact that the peanut is not consonantal and it is not feudatory is not correct. sent2: the contester is not feudatory if the Thatcher does not dissimilate talipot. sent3: the snowman does hire but it does not fritter embezzler if the Stalinization is not non-individual.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Stalinization is an individual.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the snowman hires and does not fritter embezzler.; int1 -> int2: the fact that there exists something such that it hires and does not fritter embezzler hold.;
$hypothesis$ = if the Stalinization is a kind of an individual then the fact that the peanut is not consonantal and it is not feudatory does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the contester is not feudatory the fact that the peanut is not consonantal and it is not feudatory is not correct. sent2: the contester is not feudatory if the Thatcher does not dissimilate talipot. sent3: the snowman does hire but it does not fritter embezzler if the Stalinization is not non-individual. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Stalinization is an individual.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the snowman hires and does not fritter embezzler.; int1 -> int2: the fact that there exists something such that it hires and does not fritter embezzler hold.; __UNKNOWN__