the injustice does not occur.
sent1: the injustice happens if the ecoterrorism occurs but the exclaiming kilobit does not occur. sent2: that the pinning maser but not the demolishing occurs is triggered by the hypnotizing Hume. sent3: the exclaiming ola happens. sent4: the fetalness and the immatureness happens. sent5: the ecoterrorism occurs if the service occurs. sent6: that the eliminating vacuolization happens and the econometricsness happens is wrong if the servicing does not occur. sent7: if that the servicing and the non-attitudinalness happens is not true then the non-attitudinal occurs. sent8: the immunochemicalness but not the covertness happens. sent9: the misbelieving happens. sent10: the demolishing does not occur. sent11: both the pinning mine and the non-cogitativeness happens. sent12: that the hypnotizing Hume occurs triggers that the demolishing does not occur. sent13: the hypnotizing Hume and the misbelieving occurs. sent14: the fact that the precancerousness does not occur is not wrong if the pinning maser happens but the demolishing does not occur. sent15: the backhander occurs but the antibacterial does not occur. sent16: the fact that the mailing does not occur is correct. sent17: if the exclaiming ola occurs then the fact that the exclaiming kilobit does not occur is not false. sent18: the pinning Prakrit does not occur. sent19: that the life but not the hypnotizing Mus occurs prevents that the mot does not occur. sent20: if the pirate occurs then that not the service but the injustice occurs does not hold. sent21: that the halma occurs is correct. sent22: both the hypnotizing Platonism and the skincare occurs. sent23: if the pinning maser and the demolishing occurs that the precancerousness does not occur hold. sent24: the exclaiming kilobit leads to either that the demolishing does not occur or that the ecoterrorism does not occur or both. sent25: both the hypnotizing techie and the apophysealness occurs. sent26: the hypnotizing twenty-twenty but not the cock-a-doodle-doo happens. sent27: the precancerousness happens if the pirating does not occur. sent28: that the econometricsness does not occur prevents that the pirating happens. sent29: the pirating does not occur if the fact that the eliminating vacuolization and the econometricsness occurs is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the servicing does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the eliminating vacuolization and the econometricsness occurs is not true.; int1 & sent29 -> int2: the pirating does not occur.; int2 & sent27 -> int3: the precancerousness happens.; sent13 -> int4: the hypnotizing Hume occurs.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the pinning maser but not the demolishing happens.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the precancerousness does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the service happens.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the ecoterrorism occurs.; sent17 & sent3 -> int10: the fact that the exclaiming kilobit does not occur is right.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the ecoterrorism happens and the exclaiming kilobit does not occur.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the injustice does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the injustice does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the injustice happens if the ecoterrorism occurs but the exclaiming kilobit does not occur. sent2: that the pinning maser but not the demolishing occurs is triggered by the hypnotizing Hume. sent3: the exclaiming ola happens. sent4: the fetalness and the immatureness happens. sent5: the ecoterrorism occurs if the service occurs. sent6: that the eliminating vacuolization happens and the econometricsness happens is wrong if the servicing does not occur. sent7: if that the servicing and the non-attitudinalness happens is not true then the non-attitudinal occurs. sent8: the immunochemicalness but not the covertness happens. sent9: the misbelieving happens. sent10: the demolishing does not occur. sent11: both the pinning mine and the non-cogitativeness happens. sent12: that the hypnotizing Hume occurs triggers that the demolishing does not occur. sent13: the hypnotizing Hume and the misbelieving occurs. sent14: the fact that the precancerousness does not occur is not wrong if the pinning maser happens but the demolishing does not occur. sent15: the backhander occurs but the antibacterial does not occur. sent16: the fact that the mailing does not occur is correct. sent17: if the exclaiming ola occurs then the fact that the exclaiming kilobit does not occur is not false. sent18: the pinning Prakrit does not occur. sent19: that the life but not the hypnotizing Mus occurs prevents that the mot does not occur. sent20: if the pirate occurs then that not the service but the injustice occurs does not hold. sent21: that the halma occurs is correct. sent22: both the hypnotizing Platonism and the skincare occurs. sent23: if the pinning maser and the demolishing occurs that the precancerousness does not occur hold. sent24: the exclaiming kilobit leads to either that the demolishing does not occur or that the ecoterrorism does not occur or both. sent25: both the hypnotizing techie and the apophysealness occurs. sent26: the hypnotizing twenty-twenty but not the cock-a-doodle-doo happens. sent27: the precancerousness happens if the pirating does not occur. sent28: that the econometricsness does not occur prevents that the pirating happens. sent29: the pirating does not occur if the fact that the eliminating vacuolization and the econometricsness occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the servicing does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the eliminating vacuolization and the econometricsness occurs is not true.; int1 & sent29 -> int2: the pirating does not occur.; int2 & sent27 -> int3: the precancerousness happens.; sent13 -> int4: the hypnotizing Hume occurs.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the pinning maser but not the demolishing happens.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the precancerousness does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the service happens.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the ecoterrorism occurs.; sent17 & sent3 -> int10: the fact that the exclaiming kilobit does not occur is right.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the ecoterrorism happens and the exclaiming kilobit does not occur.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__