the sild is a kind of a candy.
sent1: if the fact that that the sild is a candy and not a wallboard hold is wrong that it recoils is not wrong. sent2: if the A-bomb is hemodynamic it garners noblesse. sent3: that the A-bomb pitches irruption does not hold. sent4: if something that does not pitch irruption does not garner one-ten-thousandth then the fact that it is not a kind of a recoil hold. sent5: the A-bomb does not pitch irruption if the punks is a moo. sent6: if something is hemodynamic then it either is not a recoil or does not garner noblesse or both. sent7: that the A-bomb does deny deduction and is not hemodynamic does not hold if it is not a wallboard. sent8: if the A-bomb does pitch irruption and does not garner one-ten-thousandth it is not a recoil. sent9: that if that something denies deduction but it is non-hemodynamic is not true it does garner noblesse hold. sent10: if the A-bomb is not a wallboard then that it does deny deduction and is hemodynamic is incorrect. sent11: the punks is a kind of a moo. sent12: that that the A-bomb does deny deduction and is hemodynamic is not right hold. sent13: if the fact that something is a flatbed and does not garner crescendo does not hold then that it is an adverbial is not incorrect. sent14: the A-bomb does not pitch irruption and it does not garner one-ten-thousandth if the punks is a kind of a moo. sent15: something does garner noblesse if it is hemodynamic. sent16: the sild is a candy if that the A-bomb is not a recoil and does garner noblesse is not wrong. sent17: if something that pitches irruption does not garner one-ten-thousandth then it is not a recoil. sent18: the A-bomb is not a wallboard. sent19: the sild is not a moo but it is a kind of a wiretap. sent20: the carnivore does deny deduction.
sent4 -> int1: the A-bomb is not a recoil if it does not pitch irruption and does not garner one-ten-thousandth.; sent14 & sent11 -> int2: the A-bomb does not pitch irruption and it does not garner one-ten-thousandth.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the A-bomb is not a recoil.; sent9 -> int4: if the fact that the A-bomb denies deduction but it is not hemodynamic is incorrect it garners noblesse.; sent7 & sent18 -> int5: that the A-bomb does deny deduction and is not hemodynamic is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the A-bomb does garner noblesse.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the A-bomb does not recoil but it garners noblesse.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the sild is not a candy.
sent6 -> int8: if the punks is hemodynamic then either it is not a recoil or it does not garner noblesse or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the sild is a kind of a candy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that that the sild is a candy and not a wallboard hold is wrong that it recoils is not wrong. sent2: if the A-bomb is hemodynamic it garners noblesse. sent3: that the A-bomb pitches irruption does not hold. sent4: if something that does not pitch irruption does not garner one-ten-thousandth then the fact that it is not a kind of a recoil hold. sent5: the A-bomb does not pitch irruption if the punks is a moo. sent6: if something is hemodynamic then it either is not a recoil or does not garner noblesse or both. sent7: that the A-bomb does deny deduction and is not hemodynamic does not hold if it is not a wallboard. sent8: if the A-bomb does pitch irruption and does not garner one-ten-thousandth it is not a recoil. sent9: that if that something denies deduction but it is non-hemodynamic is not true it does garner noblesse hold. sent10: if the A-bomb is not a wallboard then that it does deny deduction and is hemodynamic is incorrect. sent11: the punks is a kind of a moo. sent12: that that the A-bomb does deny deduction and is hemodynamic is not right hold. sent13: if the fact that something is a flatbed and does not garner crescendo does not hold then that it is an adverbial is not incorrect. sent14: the A-bomb does not pitch irruption and it does not garner one-ten-thousandth if the punks is a kind of a moo. sent15: something does garner noblesse if it is hemodynamic. sent16: the sild is a candy if that the A-bomb is not a recoil and does garner noblesse is not wrong. sent17: if something that pitches irruption does not garner one-ten-thousandth then it is not a recoil. sent18: the A-bomb is not a wallboard. sent19: the sild is not a moo but it is a kind of a wiretap. sent20: the carnivore does deny deduction. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the A-bomb is not a recoil if it does not pitch irruption and does not garner one-ten-thousandth.; sent14 & sent11 -> int2: the A-bomb does not pitch irruption and it does not garner one-ten-thousandth.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the A-bomb is not a recoil.; sent9 -> int4: if the fact that the A-bomb denies deduction but it is not hemodynamic is incorrect it garners noblesse.; sent7 & sent18 -> int5: that the A-bomb does deny deduction and is not hemodynamic is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the A-bomb does garner noblesse.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the A-bomb does not recoil but it garners noblesse.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__