something does not cram homeless and is not a Marxist.
sent1: the construction is not a ware. sent2: there exists something such that it does not cram homeless and it is a kind of a Marxist. sent3: there is something such that it is fluvial. sent4: something results if the fact that it is not a sowbread and it is a Hemingway is not correct. sent5: if something is a kind of a result that crams homeless then the Minoan is Ugandan. sent6: that the chaise is admissible and is a kind of a Ugandan does not hold. sent7: something is not insensible. sent8: if the construction is a sowbread it does result. sent9: that the pesthole does not cram homeless but it is admissible is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Marxist. sent10: that something is both admissible and a Ugandan hold. sent11: if the fact that the pesthole does not cram homeless but it is admissible is false then the fact that the Minoan does cram homeless hold. sent12: the pesthole is not a kind of a Marxist. sent13: there is something such that it is a kind of a result. sent14: the construction is not a Marxist if there are non-fluvial things. sent15: something is a kind of a Ugandan if that it is not a kind of a Ugandan and it is not a sowbread is not true. sent16: that the Minoan is Ugandan does not hold if there exists something such that that it is admissible thing that is a Ugandan is not right. sent17: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Marxist. sent18: if the construction is a kind of a Ugandan the NADP is a Ugandan. sent19: something is a result if it is a sowbread. sent20: if something is not insensible then that the construction is not a sowbread but it is a Hemingway is not correct. sent21: if something is not a Ugandan the Minoan is not a Ugandan. sent22: that the construction is a sowbread that is a Hemingway is not right. sent23: that something is both not Ugandan and not a sowbread is not true if it is sensible. sent24: there is something such that it crams homeless and it is not Marxist.
sent7 & sent20 -> int1: that the construction is not a sowbread but it is a Hemingway does not hold.; sent4 -> int2: if the fact that the construction is not a sowbread but it is a Hemingway is not correct it is a result.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the construction is a result.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the construction crams homeless.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the construction is a result and it does cram homeless.; int4 -> int5: something is a result and it does cram homeless.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the Minoan is a Ugandan.; sent6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is admissible and is a Ugandan is not true.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the Minoan is not a Ugandan.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the construction does not cram homeless.;
the NADP is Ugandan.
sent15 -> int11: the construction is a kind of a Ugandan if that it is not a Ugandan and is not a sowbread is wrong.; sent23 -> int12: the fact that the construction is non-Ugandan thing that is not a sowbread is false if it is sensible.; sent9 & sent12 -> int13: the fact that the pesthole does not cram homeless but it is admissible is not true.; sent11 & int13 -> int14: that the Minoan crams homeless is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = something does not cram homeless and is not a Marxist. ; $context$ = sent1: the construction is not a ware. sent2: there exists something such that it does not cram homeless and it is a kind of a Marxist. sent3: there is something such that it is fluvial. sent4: something results if the fact that it is not a sowbread and it is a Hemingway is not correct. sent5: if something is a kind of a result that crams homeless then the Minoan is Ugandan. sent6: that the chaise is admissible and is a kind of a Ugandan does not hold. sent7: something is not insensible. sent8: if the construction is a sowbread it does result. sent9: that the pesthole does not cram homeless but it is admissible is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Marxist. sent10: that something is both admissible and a Ugandan hold. sent11: if the fact that the pesthole does not cram homeless but it is admissible is false then the fact that the Minoan does cram homeless hold. sent12: the pesthole is not a kind of a Marxist. sent13: there is something such that it is a kind of a result. sent14: the construction is not a Marxist if there are non-fluvial things. sent15: something is a kind of a Ugandan if that it is not a kind of a Ugandan and it is not a sowbread is not true. sent16: that the Minoan is Ugandan does not hold if there exists something such that that it is admissible thing that is a Ugandan is not right. sent17: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Marxist. sent18: if the construction is a kind of a Ugandan the NADP is a Ugandan. sent19: something is a result if it is a sowbread. sent20: if something is not insensible then that the construction is not a sowbread but it is a Hemingway is not correct. sent21: if something is not a Ugandan the Minoan is not a Ugandan. sent22: that the construction is a sowbread that is a Hemingway is not right. sent23: that something is both not Ugandan and not a sowbread is not true if it is sensible. sent24: there is something such that it crams homeless and it is not Marxist. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent20 -> int1: that the construction is not a sowbread but it is a Hemingway does not hold.; sent4 -> int2: if the fact that the construction is not a sowbread but it is a Hemingway is not correct it is a result.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the construction is a result.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the construction crams homeless.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the construction is a result and it does cram homeless.; int4 -> int5: something is a result and it does cram homeless.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the Minoan is a Ugandan.; sent6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is admissible and is a Ugandan is not true.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the Minoan is not a Ugandan.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the construction does not cram homeless.; __UNKNOWN__