the bestseller is a Schadenfreude and it galvanizes.
sent1: the bestseller is a Schadenfreude and it does galvanize if the recess is not a Schadenfreude. sent2: the scale does not suffice. sent3: an inflationary thing that is not Assamese is not a kind of a Schadenfreude. sent4: the recess is inflationary but it is not Assamese if the suet does not suffice. sent5: the origanum is not a Archosargus. sent6: that the suet is Australasian thing that does not predict is incorrect if the origanum is a superior. sent7: the fact that something that does predict is not a faller is right. sent8: if that something is not superior but it is a capote is incorrect then it is a superior. sent9: the fact that the suet does not suffice is not wrong. sent10: the ylem is both a Schadenfreude and a Dimetane. sent11: if something is not a faller then it does not suffice. sent12: if the origanum is not a kind of a Archosargus then that it is non-superior thing that is a capote is incorrect. sent13: that something is a Schadenfreude and it galvanizes does not hold if it does not suffice. sent14: an inflationary thing that is a kind of a Assamese is not a kind of a Schadenfreude.
sent3 -> int1: if the recess is inflationary thing that is not a kind of a Assamese then it is not a Schadenfreude.; sent4 & sent9 -> int2: the recess is inflationary and is not a Assamese.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the recess is not a Schadenfreude.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bestseller is a Schadenfreude and it galvanizes does not hold.
sent13 -> int4: that the fact that the bestseller is a kind of a Schadenfreude and it does galvanize is correct is false if that it does not suffice hold.; sent11 -> int5: if the bestseller is not a faller then it does not suffice.; sent7 -> int6: if the bestseller predicts then it is not a kind of a faller.; sent8 -> int7: if that the origanum is not a superior but it is a capote is not correct then it is a kind of a superior.; sent12 & sent5 -> int8: that the origanum is not a superior and is a capote does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the origanum is a superior is true.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: that the suet is Australasian but it does not predict does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is Australasian and it does not predict is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the bestseller is a Schadenfreude and it galvanizes. ; $context$ = sent1: the bestseller is a Schadenfreude and it does galvanize if the recess is not a Schadenfreude. sent2: the scale does not suffice. sent3: an inflationary thing that is not Assamese is not a kind of a Schadenfreude. sent4: the recess is inflationary but it is not Assamese if the suet does not suffice. sent5: the origanum is not a Archosargus. sent6: that the suet is Australasian thing that does not predict is incorrect if the origanum is a superior. sent7: the fact that something that does predict is not a faller is right. sent8: if that something is not superior but it is a capote is incorrect then it is a superior. sent9: the fact that the suet does not suffice is not wrong. sent10: the ylem is both a Schadenfreude and a Dimetane. sent11: if something is not a faller then it does not suffice. sent12: if the origanum is not a kind of a Archosargus then that it is non-superior thing that is a capote is incorrect. sent13: that something is a Schadenfreude and it galvanizes does not hold if it does not suffice. sent14: an inflationary thing that is a kind of a Assamese is not a kind of a Schadenfreude. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the recess is inflationary thing that is not a kind of a Assamese then it is not a Schadenfreude.; sent4 & sent9 -> int2: the recess is inflationary and is not a Assamese.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the recess is not a Schadenfreude.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__