the photopigment is not a Cabell.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that that it is circadian and it is a spillage is not incorrect is not correct. sent2: if something is not blastodermatic it is geometric. sent3: that the balloonist is effortful and it is not anthropocentric is not false. sent4: the Labourite does not stigmatize postmark if there is something such that the fact that it does stigmatize postmark and it is woody does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that it is a maser and it is not a Marconi then the hormone does not permit poler. sent6: the garboard is a sodalite if there exists something such that the fact that it capers and it is not insufficient does not hold. sent7: the wince is not a kind of a Populus. sent8: the wince is not a spillage. sent9: if the wince is not a kind of a spillage the humorist is not blastodermatic. sent10: something is not geometric if it is a sodalite and it is a spillage. sent11: if something is a notification and is not circadian then it is not geometric. sent12: that that the wince is a Cabell is not false if the dapsone is a Cabell is right. sent13: the garboard is a spillage and it is a woodcraft if there exists something such that it does not permit poler. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a orthopter and it is not a nonmetal is not right. sent15: the photopigment is not a Slovenian. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is a notification that is not circadian does not hold the photopigment is not a Cabell. sent17: the tequila is a kind of a maser but it is not a Marconi. sent18: if the fact that the balloonist is not effortless is not wrong the fact that it does stigmatize postmark and it is woody is not true. sent19: something is a kind of a Cabell if that it is geometric and is not blastodermatic is false. sent20: the photopigment is a Cabell if the wince is a kind of a Cabell. sent21: the wince does not stigmatize intercession. sent22: if something does not stigmatize postmark that it is a caper and it is not insufficient is not true.
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the humorist is not geometric is not false if it is a notification and not circadian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the humorist is a notification but it is not circadian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the humorist is not geometric.; sent2 -> int3: the humorist is not non-geometric if it is not blastodermatic.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: that the humorist is not blastodermatic is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the humorist is geometric.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the humorist is a notification but it is non-circadian is not true.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a kind of a notification and it is not circadian is not correct.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the photopigment is a kind of a Cabell.
sent19 -> int9: if that the fact that the dapsone is geometric thing that is non-blastodermatic does not hold is not false it is a Cabell.; sent10 -> int10: that the garboard is not geometric hold if it is a kind of a sodalite and is a kind of a spillage.; sent22 -> int11: if the Labourite does not stigmatize postmark the fact that it is a kind of a caper and it is not insufficient is wrong.; sent3 -> int12: the balloonist is not effortless.; sent18 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the balloonist stigmatizes postmark and is woody is incorrect.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that that it does stigmatize postmark and it is woody does not hold.; int14 & sent4 -> int15: that the Labourite does not stigmatize postmark is true.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the Labourite capers and is not insufficient is wrong.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it does caper and is sufficient is not true.; int17 & sent6 -> int18: the garboard is a kind of a sodalite.; sent17 -> int19: something is a maser but it is not a kind of a Marconi.; int19 & sent5 -> int20: that the hormone does not permit poler hold.; int20 -> int21: something does not permit poler.; int21 & sent13 -> int22: the garboard is a spillage and a woodcraft.; int22 -> int23: the garboard is a spillage.; int18 & int23 -> int24: the garboard is a kind of a sodalite that is a spillage.; int10 & int24 -> int25: the garboard is not geometric.; int25 -> int26: there are non-geometric things.;
$hypothesis$ = the photopigment is not a Cabell. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that that it is circadian and it is a spillage is not incorrect is not correct. sent2: if something is not blastodermatic it is geometric. sent3: that the balloonist is effortful and it is not anthropocentric is not false. sent4: the Labourite does not stigmatize postmark if there is something such that the fact that it does stigmatize postmark and it is woody does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that it is a maser and it is not a Marconi then the hormone does not permit poler. sent6: the garboard is a sodalite if there exists something such that the fact that it capers and it is not insufficient does not hold. sent7: the wince is not a kind of a Populus. sent8: the wince is not a spillage. sent9: if the wince is not a kind of a spillage the humorist is not blastodermatic. sent10: something is not geometric if it is a sodalite and it is a spillage. sent11: if something is a notification and is not circadian then it is not geometric. sent12: that that the wince is a Cabell is not false if the dapsone is a Cabell is right. sent13: the garboard is a spillage and it is a woodcraft if there exists something such that it does not permit poler. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a orthopter and it is not a nonmetal is not right. sent15: the photopigment is not a Slovenian. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is a notification that is not circadian does not hold the photopigment is not a Cabell. sent17: the tequila is a kind of a maser but it is not a Marconi. sent18: if the fact that the balloonist is not effortless is not wrong the fact that it does stigmatize postmark and it is woody is not true. sent19: something is a kind of a Cabell if that it is geometric and is not blastodermatic is false. sent20: the photopigment is a Cabell if the wince is a kind of a Cabell. sent21: the wince does not stigmatize intercession. sent22: if something does not stigmatize postmark that it is a caper and it is not insufficient is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the humorist is not geometric is not false if it is a notification and not circadian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the humorist is a notification but it is not circadian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the humorist is not geometric.; sent2 -> int3: the humorist is not non-geometric if it is not blastodermatic.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: that the humorist is not blastodermatic is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the humorist is geometric.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the humorist is a notification but it is non-circadian is not true.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a kind of a notification and it is not circadian is not correct.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__