the roentgenogram is unrighteous or it is a kind of a missionary or both.
sent1: the ceramic does stint chaja. sent2: the roentgenogram is a riffle if it is not diagonalizable and it is not a cover. sent3: that if the golf-club does stint chaja the golf-club is a kind of a nonagenarian is correct. sent4: the roentgenogram is both not diagonalizable and not a cover. sent5: the golf-club is smoky if the ceramic is smoky. sent6: the roentgenogram is myotonic. sent7: the golf-club stints chaja. sent8: the ceramic is not non-smoky. sent9: that the roentgenogram is a kind of non-smoky thing that is unrighteous is incorrect if it does riffle. sent10: either the roentgenogram is unrighteous or it is missionary or both if the jurisdiction is not unrighteous. sent11: if the jurisdiction is not a riffle the golf-club is not smoky but it is a nonagenarian. sent12: that the jurisdiction is not unrighteous is not wrong if the golf-club is smoky and it is a kind of a nonagenarian. sent13: if the golf-club does not stint chaja then that either the roentgenogram is unrighteous or it is missionary or both is not true. sent14: The chaja stints golf-club.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the golf-club is a nonagenarian.; sent5 & sent8 -> int2: the golf-club is smoky.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the golf-club is smoky and a nonagenarian.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the jurisdiction is not unrighteous.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that either the roentgenogram is unrighteous or it is a kind of a missionary or both is false.
$hypothesis$ = the roentgenogram is unrighteous or it is a kind of a missionary or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the ceramic does stint chaja. sent2: the roentgenogram is a riffle if it is not diagonalizable and it is not a cover. sent3: that if the golf-club does stint chaja the golf-club is a kind of a nonagenarian is correct. sent4: the roentgenogram is both not diagonalizable and not a cover. sent5: the golf-club is smoky if the ceramic is smoky. sent6: the roentgenogram is myotonic. sent7: the golf-club stints chaja. sent8: the ceramic is not non-smoky. sent9: that the roentgenogram is a kind of non-smoky thing that is unrighteous is incorrect if it does riffle. sent10: either the roentgenogram is unrighteous or it is missionary or both if the jurisdiction is not unrighteous. sent11: if the jurisdiction is not a riffle the golf-club is not smoky but it is a nonagenarian. sent12: that the jurisdiction is not unrighteous is not wrong if the golf-club is smoky and it is a kind of a nonagenarian. sent13: if the golf-club does not stint chaja then that either the roentgenogram is unrighteous or it is missionary or both is not true. sent14: The chaja stints golf-club. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the golf-club is a nonagenarian.; sent5 & sent8 -> int2: the golf-club is smoky.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the golf-club is smoky and a nonagenarian.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the jurisdiction is not unrighteous.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__