the fact that there exists something such that if that it is both not cathodic and firmamental is false then it is not a conspicuousness is not correct.
sent1: if something is not cathodic and is firmamental it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent2: the fulmar is a conspicuousness if that it is not cathodic and is firmamental is incorrect. sent3: that there exists something such that if that it is not cathodic and it is firmamental is incorrect then it is a kind of a conspicuousness hold. sent4: there is something such that if that it does not jive and is a atmometer is not correct the fact that it is filar is not true. sent5: there exists something such that if that it does not gladden stencil and is adsorbent is not true then it is not a kind of a hymeneal. sent6: something is not a conspicuousness if that it is non-cathodic thing that is firmamental is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not firmamental it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent8: there is something such that if it is not cathodic and it is firmamental it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a hysterosalpingogram and is a festival is not true it is not effervescent. sent10: if the fact that something does not jive but it is a sabbat is not true then it is not a foremother. sent11: something is not a winker if the fact that it is not a disposable and it is a nectarine is not true. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it does not gladden Damascene and it is Singhalese is incorrect then it is not a kind of a bloom. sent13: if the fulmar is not cathodic but it is firmamental it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of cathodic thing that is firmamental is not correct then it is not a conspicuousness. sent15: something is a conspicuousness if that it is not cathodic and it is firmamental is incorrect. sent16: if something is not firmamental then it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent17: if the fact that something is not non-cathodic but firmamental is not correct then it is not a conspicuousness. sent18: the fulmar is not a kind of a conspicuousness if it is not firmamental. sent19: the fulmar is not a conspicuousness if the fact that it is cathodic and it is firmamental is not right.
sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the fulmar is not cathodic but it is not non-firmamental is wrong it is not a conspicuousness.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it does not jive and it is a kind of a sabbat is not true then it is not a foremother.
sent10 -> int2: the triazine is not a foremother if the fact that it does not jive and it is a sabbat is false.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it is both not cathodic and firmamental is false then it is not a conspicuousness is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not cathodic and is firmamental it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent2: the fulmar is a conspicuousness if that it is not cathodic and is firmamental is incorrect. sent3: that there exists something such that if that it is not cathodic and it is firmamental is incorrect then it is a kind of a conspicuousness hold. sent4: there is something such that if that it does not jive and is a atmometer is not correct the fact that it is filar is not true. sent5: there exists something such that if that it does not gladden stencil and is adsorbent is not true then it is not a kind of a hymeneal. sent6: something is not a conspicuousness if that it is non-cathodic thing that is firmamental is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not firmamental it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent8: there is something such that if it is not cathodic and it is firmamental it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a hysterosalpingogram and is a festival is not true it is not effervescent. sent10: if the fact that something does not jive but it is a sabbat is not true then it is not a foremother. sent11: something is not a winker if the fact that it is not a disposable and it is a nectarine is not true. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it does not gladden Damascene and it is Singhalese is incorrect then it is not a kind of a bloom. sent13: if the fulmar is not cathodic but it is firmamental it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of cathodic thing that is firmamental is not correct then it is not a conspicuousness. sent15: something is a conspicuousness if that it is not cathodic and it is firmamental is incorrect. sent16: if something is not firmamental then it is not a kind of a conspicuousness. sent17: if the fact that something is not non-cathodic but firmamental is not correct then it is not a conspicuousness. sent18: the fulmar is not a kind of a conspicuousness if it is not firmamental. sent19: the fulmar is not a conspicuousness if the fact that it is cathodic and it is firmamental is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the fulmar is not cathodic but it is not non-firmamental is wrong it is not a conspicuousness.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__