the armorialness happens.
sent1: the architecturalness occurs. sent2: the intensifying thumbnail occurs. sent3: the fact that that the intensifying paw occurs and the ambulation occurs is incorrect is not incorrect. sent4: the Coleridgianness does not occur. sent5: that the conceptualisticness does not occur and the ruse happens is false if the colorness does not occur. sent6: both the Amharic and the aquiculturalness happens. sent7: that the pastorate happens or that the exercise occurs or both results in that the ratcheting Tetragrammaton does not occur. sent8: the color happens and the intensifying thumbnail occurs. sent9: that the catarrhine occurs prevents that the homileticsness happens. sent10: the homileticsness does not occur if the ambulation occurs or the catarrhine happens or both. sent11: both the intensifying curmudgeon and the architecturalness occurs. sent12: if that not the intensifying paw but the ambulation happens does not hold the ruse happens. sent13: the armorialness does not occur if both the conceptualisticness and the coloring happens. sent14: both the trapezoidalness and the hyperbolicness happens. sent15: the preying Harrison happens. sent16: both the homileticsness and the preying Harrison happens. sent17: the regionalness does not occur. sent18: if the ruse occurs then the conceptualisticness happens. sent19: that the equestrianness and the smearing occurs prevents that the hyperbolicness happens. sent20: the intensifying paw yields the ruse. sent21: the monstrosity and the grinding occurs. sent22: if that that the armorialness does not occur and the intensifying paw does not occur is not false does not hold the armorialness occurs. sent23: the intensifying paw does not occur. sent24: if the ruse does not occur that the homileticsness happens and the catarrhine occurs is not right. sent25: the fact that the picking happens and the equestrianness happens is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intensifying paw does not occur and the ambulation occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the ambulation happens.; int1 -> int2: either the ambulation happens or the catarrhine happens or both.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: that the homileticsness does not occur is not false.; sent16 -> int4: the homileticsness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the intensifying paw does not occur and the ambulation happens does not hold.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the ruse occurs.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the conceptualisticness happens.; sent8 -> int9: the colorness happens.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the conceptualisticness and the colorness occurs.; int10 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the armorialness occurs is right.
$hypothesis$ = the armorialness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the architecturalness occurs. sent2: the intensifying thumbnail occurs. sent3: the fact that that the intensifying paw occurs and the ambulation occurs is incorrect is not incorrect. sent4: the Coleridgianness does not occur. sent5: that the conceptualisticness does not occur and the ruse happens is false if the colorness does not occur. sent6: both the Amharic and the aquiculturalness happens. sent7: that the pastorate happens or that the exercise occurs or both results in that the ratcheting Tetragrammaton does not occur. sent8: the color happens and the intensifying thumbnail occurs. sent9: that the catarrhine occurs prevents that the homileticsness happens. sent10: the homileticsness does not occur if the ambulation occurs or the catarrhine happens or both. sent11: both the intensifying curmudgeon and the architecturalness occurs. sent12: if that not the intensifying paw but the ambulation happens does not hold the ruse happens. sent13: the armorialness does not occur if both the conceptualisticness and the coloring happens. sent14: both the trapezoidalness and the hyperbolicness happens. sent15: the preying Harrison happens. sent16: both the homileticsness and the preying Harrison happens. sent17: the regionalness does not occur. sent18: if the ruse occurs then the conceptualisticness happens. sent19: that the equestrianness and the smearing occurs prevents that the hyperbolicness happens. sent20: the intensifying paw yields the ruse. sent21: the monstrosity and the grinding occurs. sent22: if that that the armorialness does not occur and the intensifying paw does not occur is not false does not hold the armorialness occurs. sent23: the intensifying paw does not occur. sent24: if the ruse does not occur that the homileticsness happens and the catarrhine occurs is not right. sent25: the fact that the picking happens and the equestrianness happens is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intensifying paw does not occur and the ambulation occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the ambulation happens.; int1 -> int2: either the ambulation happens or the catarrhine happens or both.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: that the homileticsness does not occur is not false.; sent16 -> int4: the homileticsness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the intensifying paw does not occur and the ambulation happens does not hold.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the ruse occurs.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the conceptualisticness happens.; sent8 -> int9: the colorness happens.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the conceptualisticness and the colorness occurs.; int10 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__