the callithumpianness occurs.
sent1: if that the offensiveness occurs is not incorrect the fragmenting patronymic but not the quackery happens. sent2: the cybercrime occurs if the cyprinid does not occur. sent3: that the sputtering foremast happens is caused by that the picketing does not occur. sent4: the quackery does not occur. sent5: if that not the picketing but the branchiopodness occurs is not true the branchiopodness does not occur. sent6: the callithumpianness occurs if the fact that the extravaganza but not the branchiopod occurs is incorrect. sent7: if the picket does not occur then the clanking chartreuse occurs and the sputtering foremast occurs. sent8: if the cybercrime does not occur then that the extravaganza occurs and the branchiopod happens does not hold. sent9: the cyprinidness happens if the offensiveness does not occur. sent10: if the peepshow does not occur that the mold occurs but the clanking dispersion does not occur does not hold. sent11: that the branchiopodness happens prevents that the callithumpianness does not occur. sent12: the sputtering foremast does not occur if the thaw does not occur and the depilation happens. sent13: that the fact that not the picketing but the branchiopod happens is not right if the sputtering foremast does not occur is not wrong. sent14: if the cybercrime does not occur then the fact that the extravaganza and the non-branchiopodness happens is incorrect. sent15: the offensiveness results in that the quackery does not occur. sent16: the fact that the extravaganza occurs and the branchiopodness occurs is not correct. sent17: that the clanking chartreuse occurs is prevented by that the fragmenting patronymic and the quackery happens. sent18: that the fragmenting patronymic but not the quackery happens brings about that the clanking chartreuse does not occur. sent19: that the sputtering foremast happens is not wrong. sent20: that the non-cyprinidness and the extravaganza happens results in the cybercrime. sent21: that the callithumpianness does not occur is triggered by that the offensiveness does not occur and the clanking chartreuse does not occur. sent22: the cyprinid occurs. sent23: the picketing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the offensiveness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fragmenting patronymic but not the quackery happens.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the clanking chartreuse does not occur.; sent7 & sent23 -> int3: the clanking chartreuse happens and the sputtering foremast happens.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the clanking chartreuse occurs hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the offensiveness does not occur.;
the callithumpianness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the callithumpianness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the offensiveness occurs is not incorrect the fragmenting patronymic but not the quackery happens. sent2: the cybercrime occurs if the cyprinid does not occur. sent3: that the sputtering foremast happens is caused by that the picketing does not occur. sent4: the quackery does not occur. sent5: if that not the picketing but the branchiopodness occurs is not true the branchiopodness does not occur. sent6: the callithumpianness occurs if the fact that the extravaganza but not the branchiopod occurs is incorrect. sent7: if the picket does not occur then the clanking chartreuse occurs and the sputtering foremast occurs. sent8: if the cybercrime does not occur then that the extravaganza occurs and the branchiopod happens does not hold. sent9: the cyprinidness happens if the offensiveness does not occur. sent10: if the peepshow does not occur that the mold occurs but the clanking dispersion does not occur does not hold. sent11: that the branchiopodness happens prevents that the callithumpianness does not occur. sent12: the sputtering foremast does not occur if the thaw does not occur and the depilation happens. sent13: that the fact that not the picketing but the branchiopod happens is not right if the sputtering foremast does not occur is not wrong. sent14: if the cybercrime does not occur then the fact that the extravaganza and the non-branchiopodness happens is incorrect. sent15: the offensiveness results in that the quackery does not occur. sent16: the fact that the extravaganza occurs and the branchiopodness occurs is not correct. sent17: that the clanking chartreuse occurs is prevented by that the fragmenting patronymic and the quackery happens. sent18: that the fragmenting patronymic but not the quackery happens brings about that the clanking chartreuse does not occur. sent19: that the sputtering foremast happens is not wrong. sent20: that the non-cyprinidness and the extravaganza happens results in the cybercrime. sent21: that the callithumpianness does not occur is triggered by that the offensiveness does not occur and the clanking chartreuse does not occur. sent22: the cyprinid occurs. sent23: the picketing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the offensiveness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fragmenting patronymic but not the quackery happens.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the clanking chartreuse does not occur.; sent7 & sent23 -> int3: the clanking chartreuse happens and the sputtering foremast happens.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the clanking chartreuse occurs hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the offensiveness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__