there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a workbasket that it is not bizonal and it deflates woodhewer does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the shoji does not spiral capriole but it is a workbasket does not hold if it spirals Gospel. sent2: the bee is not a kind of a re-introduction but it grieves if it does not spiral Gospel. sent3: if the shoji is not a workbasket then that it is not bizonal and does deflate woodhewer is wrong. sent4: there is something such that if it is not uncharitable that it is a Bedlam and autosomal is not correct. sent5: if the shoji is not a Espagnole that it is not a workbasket and it is a liquidambar is not correct. sent6: if the shoji does not percuss that it is not noncaloric but indistinct is not true. sent7: that the necktie is non-unenforceable thing that is viscometric is incorrect if it is a workbasket. sent8: there is something such that if it is disciplinary that it does not percuss and it is a mutterer is not correct. sent9: if the shoji does not hook Ploceus that it is not a kind of a workbasket and is a Federalist is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if it is categorical then the fact that it does not spiral Gospel and does spiral plug is wrong. sent11: the fact that the shoji does not subscribe but it spirals Zygocactus is not correct if the fact that it is a coward hold. sent12: if the shoji is not a workbasket the fact that it is bizonal and deflates woodhewer is not right. sent13: if the autoradiograph is not a workbasket it is not a re-introduction and is diametric. sent14: if something is not muscular that it is not a kind of a myringoplasty and it deflates evangelicalism is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a microgauss that it is not categorical and it is febrile is true.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the familiar is non-muscular then the fact that it is not a kind of a myringoplasty and it deflates evangelicalism does not hold.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a workbasket that it is not bizonal and it deflates woodhewer does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the shoji does not spiral capriole but it is a workbasket does not hold if it spirals Gospel. sent2: the bee is not a kind of a re-introduction but it grieves if it does not spiral Gospel. sent3: if the shoji is not a workbasket then that it is not bizonal and does deflate woodhewer is wrong. sent4: there is something such that if it is not uncharitable that it is a Bedlam and autosomal is not correct. sent5: if the shoji is not a Espagnole that it is not a workbasket and it is a liquidambar is not correct. sent6: if the shoji does not percuss that it is not noncaloric but indistinct is not true. sent7: that the necktie is non-unenforceable thing that is viscometric is incorrect if it is a workbasket. sent8: there is something such that if it is disciplinary that it does not percuss and it is a mutterer is not correct. sent9: if the shoji does not hook Ploceus that it is not a kind of a workbasket and is a Federalist is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if it is categorical then the fact that it does not spiral Gospel and does spiral plug is wrong. sent11: the fact that the shoji does not subscribe but it spirals Zygocactus is not correct if the fact that it is a coward hold. sent12: if the shoji is not a workbasket the fact that it is bizonal and deflates woodhewer is not right. sent13: if the autoradiograph is not a workbasket it is not a re-introduction and is diametric. sent14: if something is not muscular that it is not a kind of a myringoplasty and it deflates evangelicalism is incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a microgauss that it is not categorical and it is febrile is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__