the corticosterone does not glow.
sent1: the corticosterone is not a kind of a glow if there is something such that it does not roof sapote. sent2: the snuffler shallows if the fact that it is not a warrener and not shallows is wrong. sent3: the Southeast is a cross and does roof sapote if there exists something such that it is shallow. sent4: the fact that something is not shallow but it is a cross is not correct if it does not forget. sent5: the corticosterone does not forget. sent6: if the corticosterone does not forget then it is a kind of shallow a cross. sent7: something that roofs sapote is a glow. sent8: that the snuffler is not a warrener and is non-shallow is not true. sent9: if something roofs clitoridectomy and/or it does not drink it is a glow. sent10: the cenobite is a khadi and it crosses. sent11: the Southeast is not a drinking. sent12: something is not a cross if it does not roof sapote. sent13: if the corticosterone does not tin Southeast it is delicate.
sent12 -> int1: if the corticosterone does not roof sapote it is not a cross.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corticosterone does not roof sapote.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the corticosterone does not cross.; sent6 & sent5 -> int3: the corticosterone shallows and it is a cross.; int3 -> int4: the corticosterone is a kind of a cross.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the corticosterone roofs sapote hold.; sent7 -> int7: if the corticosterone roofs sapote it is a glow.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the corticosterone is not a glow.
sent4 -> int8: if the snuffler does not forget the fact that it is not shallow and it is a cross is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the corticosterone does not glow. ; $context$ = sent1: the corticosterone is not a kind of a glow if there is something such that it does not roof sapote. sent2: the snuffler shallows if the fact that it is not a warrener and not shallows is wrong. sent3: the Southeast is a cross and does roof sapote if there exists something such that it is shallow. sent4: the fact that something is not shallow but it is a cross is not correct if it does not forget. sent5: the corticosterone does not forget. sent6: if the corticosterone does not forget then it is a kind of shallow a cross. sent7: something that roofs sapote is a glow. sent8: that the snuffler is not a warrener and is non-shallow is not true. sent9: if something roofs clitoridectomy and/or it does not drink it is a glow. sent10: the cenobite is a khadi and it crosses. sent11: the Southeast is not a drinking. sent12: something is not a cross if it does not roof sapote. sent13: if the corticosterone does not tin Southeast it is delicate. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the corticosterone does not roof sapote it is not a cross.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corticosterone does not roof sapote.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the corticosterone does not cross.; sent6 & sent5 -> int3: the corticosterone shallows and it is a cross.; int3 -> int4: the corticosterone is a kind of a cross.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the corticosterone roofs sapote hold.; sent7 -> int7: if the corticosterone roofs sapote it is a glow.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__