the fact that the skull is not a kind of a Badaga is right.
sent1: the resistor does not reflect deviationism if it does intumesce and is catholic. sent2: the skull is catholic and intumesces if the resistor does not intumesces. sent3: the resistor does not intumesce if that the reboxetine is outward and does reflect deviationism is incorrect. sent4: the reboxetine does not reflect deviationism if it is a Badaga and does intumesce. sent5: that that the reboxetine does intumesce and is not photographic is not incorrect is not correct if the resistor is not a habergeon. sent6: the reboxetine is catholic. sent7: that the Down is not a tout but voyeuristic is false if the botanist is not a kind of a Palestinian. sent8: something is inflexible and does not result caranday if it is not a kind of a polarity. sent9: something that is not catholic or is a Badaga or both is a kind of a Badaga. sent10: if that something intumesces and is not photographic does not hold then it does not intumesces. sent11: that the quaestor does not wake resistor hold. sent12: the resistor is outward. sent13: if the fact that the skull reflects deviationism and is a kind of a Badaga does not hold the reboxetine is not outward. sent14: if the resistor does not intumesce the skull is catholic. sent15: the resistor does not reflect deviationism. sent16: the resistor does not intumesce if that the reboxetine is not outward is not incorrect. sent17: that the reboxetine is outward thing that reflects deviationism does not hold. sent18: if something is catholic and it does intumesce then it is not a Badaga. sent19: the gemsbok is a kind of a judiciousness and it is a Badaga. sent20: the botanist is not Palestinian if the quaestor is inflexible but it does not result caranday. sent21: if the quaestor does not wake resistor it is not a kind of a polarity and is a kind of a cruiser. sent22: the skull does intumesce and is a Badaga if the resistor is not a Badaga. sent23: if the reboxetine does not intumesce the skull is not catholic and/or it is a Badaga.
sent3 & sent17 -> int1: the resistor does not intumesce.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the skull is not non-catholic and it does intumesce.; sent18 -> int3: if the skull is catholic thing that intumesces then the fact that it is not a Badaga hold.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the skull is a Badaga is not wrong.
sent9 -> int4: that if the skull either is not catholic or is a kind of the Badaga or both then the skull is a Badaga hold.; sent10 -> int5: if the fact that the reboxetine does intumesce but it is not photographic does not hold then it does not intumesce.; sent8 -> int6: if the quaestor is not a polarity it is inflexible and it does not result caranday.; sent21 & sent11 -> int7: the quaestor is not a polarity but it is a cruiser.; int7 -> int8: the quaestor is not a kind of a polarity.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the quaestor is inflexible thing that does not result caranday.; sent20 & int9 -> int10: the botanist is not a Palestinian.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the Down is not a tout but voyeuristic does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is not a tout and it is voyeuristic is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the skull is not a kind of a Badaga is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the resistor does not reflect deviationism if it does intumesce and is catholic. sent2: the skull is catholic and intumesces if the resistor does not intumesces. sent3: the resistor does not intumesce if that the reboxetine is outward and does reflect deviationism is incorrect. sent4: the reboxetine does not reflect deviationism if it is a Badaga and does intumesce. sent5: that that the reboxetine does intumesce and is not photographic is not incorrect is not correct if the resistor is not a habergeon. sent6: the reboxetine is catholic. sent7: that the Down is not a tout but voyeuristic is false if the botanist is not a kind of a Palestinian. sent8: something is inflexible and does not result caranday if it is not a kind of a polarity. sent9: something that is not catholic or is a Badaga or both is a kind of a Badaga. sent10: if that something intumesces and is not photographic does not hold then it does not intumesces. sent11: that the quaestor does not wake resistor hold. sent12: the resistor is outward. sent13: if the fact that the skull reflects deviationism and is a kind of a Badaga does not hold the reboxetine is not outward. sent14: if the resistor does not intumesce the skull is catholic. sent15: the resistor does not reflect deviationism. sent16: the resistor does not intumesce if that the reboxetine is not outward is not incorrect. sent17: that the reboxetine is outward thing that reflects deviationism does not hold. sent18: if something is catholic and it does intumesce then it is not a Badaga. sent19: the gemsbok is a kind of a judiciousness and it is a Badaga. sent20: the botanist is not Palestinian if the quaestor is inflexible but it does not result caranday. sent21: if the quaestor does not wake resistor it is not a kind of a polarity and is a kind of a cruiser. sent22: the skull does intumesce and is a Badaga if the resistor is not a Badaga. sent23: if the reboxetine does not intumesce the skull is not catholic and/or it is a Badaga. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent17 -> int1: the resistor does not intumesce.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the skull is not non-catholic and it does intumesce.; sent18 -> int3: if the skull is catholic thing that intumesces then the fact that it is not a Badaga hold.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__