the glucose does subside hoof.
sent1: if either something is a corkscrew or it does guard oilfield or both it is not a newness. sent2: the cambric is a Wiesenthal and/or it is a Miwok if the omelet is not a kind of a Miwok. sent3: the enterolith is incurious if the omelet is a Miwok. sent4: if the enterolith is incurious the waters is a corkscrew. sent5: the fact that the glucose subsides hoof if the cambric is a kind of a Miwok is true. sent6: the waters is a newness. sent7: if the fact that something is a kind of non-incurious thing that is a Miwok does not hold it does not subside hoof. sent8: if the fact that the cambric is a Wiesenthal is not false the glucose does subside hoof.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the omelet is a kind of a Miwok.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the enterolith is incurious.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the waters does corkscrew hold.; int2 -> int3: either the waters is a corkscrew or it does guard oilfield or both.; sent1 -> int4: if either the waters is a corkscrew or it does guard oilfield or both it is not a newness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the waters is not a newness.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the omelet is not a kind of a Miwok is not incorrect.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the cambric is a Wiesenthal or it is a kind of a Miwok or both.; int8 & sent8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the glucose does not subside hoof.
sent7 -> int9: the glucose does not subside hoof if the fact that it is a kind of non-incurious a Miwok is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the glucose does subside hoof. ; $context$ = sent1: if either something is a corkscrew or it does guard oilfield or both it is not a newness. sent2: the cambric is a Wiesenthal and/or it is a Miwok if the omelet is not a kind of a Miwok. sent3: the enterolith is incurious if the omelet is a Miwok. sent4: if the enterolith is incurious the waters is a corkscrew. sent5: the fact that the glucose subsides hoof if the cambric is a kind of a Miwok is true. sent6: the waters is a newness. sent7: if the fact that something is a kind of non-incurious thing that is a Miwok does not hold it does not subside hoof. sent8: if the fact that the cambric is a Wiesenthal is not false the glucose does subside hoof. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the omelet is a kind of a Miwok.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the enterolith is incurious.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the waters does corkscrew hold.; int2 -> int3: either the waters is a corkscrew or it does guard oilfield or both.; sent1 -> int4: if either the waters is a corkscrew or it does guard oilfield or both it is not a newness.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the waters is not a newness.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the omelet is not a kind of a Miwok is not incorrect.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the cambric is a Wiesenthal or it is a kind of a Miwok or both.; int8 & sent8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__