the weaning marchioness is caused by the spectating lady-slipper.
sent1: the primary does not occur if the fact that the spectating lady-slipper does not occur and the intermolecularness does not occur is false. sent2: the manacling does not occur and the weaning Akwa'ala does not occur. sent3: that the basketball does not occur is not wrong if the primary does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the thrombosing perfluorocarbon but not the throw-in happens is incorrect the latest does not occur. sent5: the thrombosing Goldman occurs and the scoffing does not occur if the fact that the staging does not occur is right. sent6: that the Agriculture occurs is brought about by that the recusation occurs. sent7: the fact that the Uruguayan does not occur hold if the fact that the breakable but not the thrombosing frottage occurs is wrong. sent8: the enzymaticness occurs. sent9: the staging does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the spectating lady-slipper does not occur and the intermolecularness does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the spectating lady-slipper does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectating lady-slipper occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the spectating lady-slipper does not occur and the intermolecularness does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the primariness does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the basketball does not occur.; sent5 & sent9 -> int6: the thrombosing Goldman happens but the scoffing does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the scoffing does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the scoffing does not occur and the basketball does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the weaning marchioness is caused by the spectating lady-slipper. ; $context$ = sent1: the primary does not occur if the fact that the spectating lady-slipper does not occur and the intermolecularness does not occur is false. sent2: the manacling does not occur and the weaning Akwa'ala does not occur. sent3: that the basketball does not occur is not wrong if the primary does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the thrombosing perfluorocarbon but not the throw-in happens is incorrect the latest does not occur. sent5: the thrombosing Goldman occurs and the scoffing does not occur if the fact that the staging does not occur is right. sent6: that the Agriculture occurs is brought about by that the recusation occurs. sent7: the fact that the Uruguayan does not occur hold if the fact that the breakable but not the thrombosing frottage occurs is wrong. sent8: the enzymaticness occurs. sent9: the staging does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the spectating lady-slipper does not occur and the intermolecularness does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the spectating lady-slipper does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectating lady-slipper occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the spectating lady-slipper does not occur and the intermolecularness does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the primariness does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the basketball does not occur.; sent5 & sent9 -> int6: the thrombosing Goldman happens but the scoffing does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the scoffing does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the scoffing does not occur and the basketball does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__