the fact that if that the maigre webs and is not an afterimage is not true then the zill is membranous is not correct.
sent1: the maigre is a Laburnum if the fact that the Muskogee is a kind of a webbing and it is a kind of an afterimage is incorrect. sent2: the Muskogee is a webbing. sent3: the maigre does cox saccule if the bolete is a kind of an afterimage. sent4: if that the maigre is a kind of an afterimage is right then the bolete does tweet nester. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the maigre is a webbing but it is not an afterimage is not right is not wrong then the bolete tweets nester. sent6: if the bolete does cox saccule then that the nester is cyclonic is not wrong. sent7: if something is agranulocytic then it is a Laburnum. sent8: the nester is agranulocytic. sent9: if the fact that the bolete does cox saccule but it is not a webbing is not correct then the maigre is a Laburnum. sent10: the cryptomonad is agranulocytic. sent11: if the fact that the nester is not non-cyclonic is right then that the Muskogee is agranulocytic is not incorrect. sent12: the nester is an afterimage. sent13: the zill is agranulocytic. sent14: the zill is membranous if the Muskogee is a kind of a Laburnum. sent15: the Muskogee does tweet nester if the bolete is a Laburnum. sent16: the Muskogee is a webbing if the maigre is a Laburnum. sent17: the nester is membranous. sent18: the Muskogee is a Laburnum if it does tweet nester. sent19: the maigre is not a webbing. sent20: if that the maigre coxes saccule and is not a webbing is wrong then the bolete is agranulocytic. sent21: that the nester does put Confucian is right. sent22: the fact that that the maigre is an afterimage but it is not a Laburnum hold is false. sent23: the fact that the maigre is a webbing and it is an afterimage is false. sent24: if something tweets nester then it coxes saccule.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the maigre does web but it is not an afterimage is wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the bolete does tweet nester.; sent24 -> int2: if the bolete tweets nester it does cox saccule.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bolete does cox saccule.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the nester is cyclonic.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the Muskogee is agranulocytic.; sent7 -> int6: that if the Muskogee is not non-agranulocytic then the Muskogee is a Laburnum is not incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Muskogee is a kind of a Laburnum.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the zill is not non-membranous.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the maigre webs and is not an afterimage is not true then the zill is membranous is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the maigre is a Laburnum if the fact that the Muskogee is a kind of a webbing and it is a kind of an afterimage is incorrect. sent2: the Muskogee is a webbing. sent3: the maigre does cox saccule if the bolete is a kind of an afterimage. sent4: if that the maigre is a kind of an afterimage is right then the bolete does tweet nester. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the maigre is a webbing but it is not an afterimage is not right is not wrong then the bolete tweets nester. sent6: if the bolete does cox saccule then that the nester is cyclonic is not wrong. sent7: if something is agranulocytic then it is a Laburnum. sent8: the nester is agranulocytic. sent9: if the fact that the bolete does cox saccule but it is not a webbing is not correct then the maigre is a Laburnum. sent10: the cryptomonad is agranulocytic. sent11: if the fact that the nester is not non-cyclonic is right then that the Muskogee is agranulocytic is not incorrect. sent12: the nester is an afterimage. sent13: the zill is agranulocytic. sent14: the zill is membranous if the Muskogee is a kind of a Laburnum. sent15: the Muskogee does tweet nester if the bolete is a Laburnum. sent16: the Muskogee is a webbing if the maigre is a Laburnum. sent17: the nester is membranous. sent18: the Muskogee is a Laburnum if it does tweet nester. sent19: the maigre is not a webbing. sent20: if that the maigre coxes saccule and is not a webbing is wrong then the bolete is agranulocytic. sent21: that the nester does put Confucian is right. sent22: the fact that that the maigre is an afterimage but it is not a Laburnum hold is false. sent23: the fact that the maigre is a webbing and it is an afterimage is false. sent24: if something tweets nester then it coxes saccule. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the maigre does web but it is not an afterimage is wrong.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the bolete does tweet nester.; sent24 -> int2: if the bolete tweets nester it does cox saccule.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bolete does cox saccule.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the nester is cyclonic.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the Muskogee is agranulocytic.; sent7 -> int6: that if the Muskogee is not non-agranulocytic then the Muskogee is a Laburnum is not incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Muskogee is a kind of a Laburnum.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the zill is not non-membranous.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__