the beatnik is not a salvo.
sent1: if the rectum is not a Bordeaux then it is not a Eurafrican but neoclassicist. sent2: the fact that the inchworm is a Abyssinian and a Kamet does not hold. sent3: something is not a meekness if it does deduce Higi. sent4: the elderberry does misconstrue industrialization if it does not skim perseveration and it is not a permit. sent5: if the rectum does not chain-smoke then the beatnik is a salvo and a Centaurium. sent6: the fact that the inchworm is a Kamet and not a salvo is false. sent7: that something is both bismuthal and a akee does not hold if it is not a meekness. sent8: if something does misconstrue industrialization it does deduce Higi. sent9: the elderberry does not skim perseveration and it does not permit. sent10: the cryogen is not a Kamet. sent11: if that the fact that the elderberry is bismuthal and it is a akee is incorrect hold then the rectum is not a Centaurium. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is a Abyssinian and it is a Kamet is wrong. sent13: if something is a neoclassicist then it is a dissection and not a Tapirus. sent14: there is nothing such that it is a Abyssinian that is a Kamet. sent15: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a Abyssinian and is not a Kamet. sent16: the rectum is not a Bordeaux if that it is not a penult and it is not a Chavez does not hold. sent17: if something is a dissection it does not chain-smoke and is impressionistic. sent18: if something is a Kamet then the beatnik is not a salvo. sent19: that the beatnik is a kind of a Kamet but it is not a kind of a salvo does not hold. sent20: if the rectum is not a Centaurium and does not chain-smoke the beatnik is a salvo. sent21: if something is a kind of a salvo that it is a Gynura and non-Gibraltarian is wrong.
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the inchworm is a kind of a Abyssinian but it is not a kind of a Kamet does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a Abyssinian and it is not a Kamet does not hold.;
that the beatnik is a salvo hold.
sent7 -> int3: if the elderberry is not a kind of a meekness that it is bismuthal and is a akee is incorrect.; sent3 -> int4: if the elderberry deduces Higi then it is not a meekness.; sent8 -> int5: if the elderberry does misconstrue industrialization it deduces Higi.; sent4 & sent9 -> int6: the elderberry misconstrues industrialization.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the elderberry does deduce Higi.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the elderberry is not a meekness.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the elderberry is bismuthal and a akee is not right.; sent11 & int9 -> int10: the rectum is not a Centaurium.; sent17 -> int11: the rectum does not chain-smoke and is impressionistic if it is a dissection.; sent13 -> int12: if the rectum is a kind of a neoclassicist it is a kind of a dissection and it is not a kind of a Tapirus.;
$hypothesis$ = the beatnik is not a salvo. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rectum is not a Bordeaux then it is not a Eurafrican but neoclassicist. sent2: the fact that the inchworm is a Abyssinian and a Kamet does not hold. sent3: something is not a meekness if it does deduce Higi. sent4: the elderberry does misconstrue industrialization if it does not skim perseveration and it is not a permit. sent5: if the rectum does not chain-smoke then the beatnik is a salvo and a Centaurium. sent6: the fact that the inchworm is a Kamet and not a salvo is false. sent7: that something is both bismuthal and a akee does not hold if it is not a meekness. sent8: if something does misconstrue industrialization it does deduce Higi. sent9: the elderberry does not skim perseveration and it does not permit. sent10: the cryogen is not a Kamet. sent11: if that the fact that the elderberry is bismuthal and it is a akee is incorrect hold then the rectum is not a Centaurium. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is a Abyssinian and it is a Kamet is wrong. sent13: if something is a neoclassicist then it is a dissection and not a Tapirus. sent14: there is nothing such that it is a Abyssinian that is a Kamet. sent15: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a Abyssinian and is not a Kamet. sent16: the rectum is not a Bordeaux if that it is not a penult and it is not a Chavez does not hold. sent17: if something is a dissection it does not chain-smoke and is impressionistic. sent18: if something is a Kamet then the beatnik is not a salvo. sent19: that the beatnik is a kind of a Kamet but it is not a kind of a salvo does not hold. sent20: if the rectum is not a Centaurium and does not chain-smoke the beatnik is a salvo. sent21: if something is a kind of a salvo that it is a Gynura and non-Gibraltarian is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the inchworm is a kind of a Abyssinian but it is not a kind of a Kamet does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a Abyssinian and it is not a Kamet does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__