either the multi-billionaire cokes or it is not a bicentennial or both.
sent1: if the trigonometrician does function the gavel is a kind of a dower or it does not function or both. sent2: if something is not a kind of a bicentennial it is a Telanthera. sent3: something that does subject fundamental is telegraphic. sent4: the fact that something is a Telanthera if either it does coke or it is not a bicentennial or both hold. sent5: the vervet subjects fundamental if the gavel is a dower. sent6: if the fact that the drey is not telegraphic is not incorrect then that the vervet is not telegraphic hold. sent7: something is a cryolite but it is not a trash. sent8: that if the multi-billionaire is a kind of a Telanthera then the trigonometrician is a kind of a function is not wrong. sent9: the vervet subjects fundamental if the gavel is not a function. sent10: the drey is not telegraphic if there is something such that it is a kind of a cryolite and it is not a trash.
sent4 -> int1: if the multi-billionaire is a coke and/or it is not a kind of a bicentennial then it is a Telanthera.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the multi-billionaire is a coke or not bicentennial or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the multi-billionaire is a Telanthera.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the trigonometrician does function.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the gavel is a dower or it is not a function or both.; int4 & sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the vervet does subject fundamental.; sent3 -> int6: the vervet is telegraphic if it subjects fundamental.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the vervet is telegraphic.; sent7 & sent10 -> int8: the drey is not telegraphic.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the vervet is not telegraphic hold.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = either the multi-billionaire cokes or it is not a bicentennial or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the trigonometrician does function the gavel is a kind of a dower or it does not function or both. sent2: if something is not a kind of a bicentennial it is a Telanthera. sent3: something that does subject fundamental is telegraphic. sent4: the fact that something is a Telanthera if either it does coke or it is not a bicentennial or both hold. sent5: the vervet subjects fundamental if the gavel is a dower. sent6: if the fact that the drey is not telegraphic is not incorrect then that the vervet is not telegraphic hold. sent7: something is a cryolite but it is not a trash. sent8: that if the multi-billionaire is a kind of a Telanthera then the trigonometrician is a kind of a function is not wrong. sent9: the vervet subjects fundamental if the gavel is not a function. sent10: the drey is not telegraphic if there is something such that it is a kind of a cryolite and it is not a trash. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the multi-billionaire is a coke and/or it is not a kind of a bicentennial then it is a Telanthera.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the multi-billionaire is a coke or not bicentennial or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the multi-billionaire is a Telanthera.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the trigonometrician does function.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the gavel is a dower or it is not a function or both.; int4 & sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the vervet does subject fundamental.; sent3 -> int6: the vervet is telegraphic if it subjects fundamental.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the vervet is telegraphic.; sent7 & sent10 -> int8: the drey is not telegraphic.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the vervet is not telegraphic hold.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__