the tableware does not gather dairyman and is rhythmical.
sent1: the seismologist is nomothetic if the tableware invokes astrology. sent2: that the seismologist is a kind of a Ammotragus is correct. sent3: if the seismologist is lean the balbriggan invokes astrology. sent4: the balbriggan is not nomothetic. sent5: the seismologist guesses firstborn. sent6: if the Uighur is a kind of a stamp the seismologist is a kind of a stamp. sent7: something does not gather antiproton and it does not invoke lighterman if it is a stamp. sent8: the seismologist does not lean. sent9: the fact that the balbriggan is not a Lewisia is not wrong. sent10: the balbriggan gathers dairyman. sent11: if something is nomothetic that it does not gather dairyman and is rhythmical is not correct. sent12: the seismologist invokes astrology. sent13: the tableware is rhythmical. sent14: the ribosome is nomothetic. sent15: the Uighur stamps. sent16: the balbriggan is not heterozygous but rhythmical. sent17: the balbriggan is not a Lewisia but it leans if the tableware does gather dairyman. sent18: the seismologist is rhythmical. sent19: a nomothetic and concise thing does not invoke astrology. sent20: if something does not gather antiproton and does not invoke lighterman that the fact that it is a kind of a pachycheilia does not hold hold. sent21: the seismologist is concise. sent22: The astrology invokes seismologist. sent23: the seismologist is not non-nomothetic if the balbriggan leans. sent24: the scrawler is both not a dedication and rhythmical. sent25: that the balbriggan is a kind of a bridal and it invokes astrology is incorrect if the seismologist is not a pachycheilia.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tableware gathers dairyman.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the balbriggan is not a Lewisia but it does lean.; int1 -> int2: the balbriggan does lean.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the seismologist is nomothetic.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the seismologist is nomothetic and it is concise is not false.; sent19 -> int5: if the seismologist is both not non-nomothetic and not non-concise it does not invoke astrology.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the seismologist does not invoke astrology.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the tableware does not gather dairyman.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the tableware does not gather dairyman and is rhythmical is false.
sent11 -> int9: if the tableware is nomothetic that it does not gather dairyman and is rhythmical is incorrect.; sent20 -> int10: if the seismologist does not gather antiproton and does not invoke lighterman it is not a pachycheilia.; sent7 -> int11: that the seismologist does not gather antiproton and it does not invoke lighterman if the seismologist does stamp is not false.; sent6 & sent15 -> int12: the fact that the seismologist does stamp is right.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the seismologist does not gather antiproton and does not invoke lighterman.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the seismologist is not a pachycheilia.; sent25 & int14 -> int15: that the balbriggan is a kind of a bridal that invokes astrology is not correct.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that the fact that it is a bridal and does invoke astrology is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the tableware does not gather dairyman and is rhythmical. ; $context$ = sent1: the seismologist is nomothetic if the tableware invokes astrology. sent2: that the seismologist is a kind of a Ammotragus is correct. sent3: if the seismologist is lean the balbriggan invokes astrology. sent4: the balbriggan is not nomothetic. sent5: the seismologist guesses firstborn. sent6: if the Uighur is a kind of a stamp the seismologist is a kind of a stamp. sent7: something does not gather antiproton and it does not invoke lighterman if it is a stamp. sent8: the seismologist does not lean. sent9: the fact that the balbriggan is not a Lewisia is not wrong. sent10: the balbriggan gathers dairyman. sent11: if something is nomothetic that it does not gather dairyman and is rhythmical is not correct. sent12: the seismologist invokes astrology. sent13: the tableware is rhythmical. sent14: the ribosome is nomothetic. sent15: the Uighur stamps. sent16: the balbriggan is not heterozygous but rhythmical. sent17: the balbriggan is not a Lewisia but it leans if the tableware does gather dairyman. sent18: the seismologist is rhythmical. sent19: a nomothetic and concise thing does not invoke astrology. sent20: if something does not gather antiproton and does not invoke lighterman that the fact that it is a kind of a pachycheilia does not hold hold. sent21: the seismologist is concise. sent22: The astrology invokes seismologist. sent23: the seismologist is not non-nomothetic if the balbriggan leans. sent24: the scrawler is both not a dedication and rhythmical. sent25: that the balbriggan is a kind of a bridal and it invokes astrology is incorrect if the seismologist is not a pachycheilia. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tableware gathers dairyman.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the balbriggan is not a Lewisia but it does lean.; int1 -> int2: the balbriggan does lean.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the seismologist is nomothetic.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the seismologist is nomothetic and it is concise is not false.; sent19 -> int5: if the seismologist is both not non-nomothetic and not non-concise it does not invoke astrology.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the seismologist does not invoke astrology.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the tableware does not gather dairyman.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__