that there exists something such that if it is an australopithecine it is not pyloric and not a slip is not incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that if it does spoon Stenotomus it is not bimolecular and it does not enjoy preexistence. sent2: the payer is not a slip if it is an australopithecine. sent3: the payer is not non-pyloric but it is not a slip if it is an australopithecine. sent4: if the payer is a kind of a slip it does not beat yachtsman and it is non-Ionic. sent5: there exists something such that if it does bald it is not painless and it does not enjoy Bothidae. sent6: there is something such that if it is an australopithecine it is not pyloric and is a slip. sent7: there is something such that if it is an australopithecine then it is not pyloric. sent8: if the payer is multilane it does not emigrate and is not a kind of a slip. sent9: something is not Shinto and it is not a kind of a Ismaili if it is a kind of a Limicolae. sent10: if the payer is australopithecine then it is not pyloric and it is not a slip. sent11: if the pyroxene does spoon great then it is a kind of non-Chechen thing that is not semiotic. sent12: there exists something such that if it is an australopithecine it is not a slip. sent13: a slip is a kind of nonretractile thing that does not beat geophyte. sent14: there is something such that if it does cane then it does not twin and it is not a kind of a dehiscence. sent15: if the yachtsman spoons Stenotomus it is not a kind of a Buddhist and it is not neolithic. sent16: there is something such that if it does snuffle enamelware it does not enjoy sibyl and it is not polite. sent17: there exists something such that if it is australopithecine then it is pyloric but not a slip.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the geophyte is not retractile and does not beat geophyte if it is a slip.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is an australopithecine it is not pyloric and not a slip is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does spoon Stenotomus it is not bimolecular and it does not enjoy preexistence. sent2: the payer is not a slip if it is an australopithecine. sent3: the payer is not non-pyloric but it is not a slip if it is an australopithecine. sent4: if the payer is a kind of a slip it does not beat yachtsman and it is non-Ionic. sent5: there exists something such that if it does bald it is not painless and it does not enjoy Bothidae. sent6: there is something such that if it is an australopithecine it is not pyloric and is a slip. sent7: there is something such that if it is an australopithecine then it is not pyloric. sent8: if the payer is multilane it does not emigrate and is not a kind of a slip. sent9: something is not Shinto and it is not a kind of a Ismaili if it is a kind of a Limicolae. sent10: if the payer is australopithecine then it is not pyloric and it is not a slip. sent11: if the pyroxene does spoon great then it is a kind of non-Chechen thing that is not semiotic. sent12: there exists something such that if it is an australopithecine it is not a slip. sent13: a slip is a kind of nonretractile thing that does not beat geophyte. sent14: there is something such that if it does cane then it does not twin and it is not a kind of a dehiscence. sent15: if the yachtsman spoons Stenotomus it is not a kind of a Buddhist and it is not neolithic. sent16: there is something such that if it does snuffle enamelware it does not enjoy sibyl and it is not polite. sent17: there exists something such that if it is australopithecine then it is pyloric but not a slip. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__