the fact that the torrent is not a preciosity if the fact that the neoconservative approbates crayon hold does not hold.
sent1: if the neoconservative is Mycenaean and/or is not barytic the pyxie is Mycenaean. sent2: if something does powderize and is Mycenaean then it is not a preciosity. sent3: that the torrent does not revamp hold if something that does not approbate demiglace is a kind of a linkage. sent4: the torrent does approbate crayon. sent5: something does not approbate demiglace but it is a linkage. sent6: the neoconservative is a preciosity if the torrent is a kind of a broadcloth. sent7: if the neoconservative cloys airgun and it approbates crayon the torrent is not a kind of a preciosity. sent8: if that the torrent does not revamp is right then the neoconservative is either Mycenaean or non-barytic or both. sent9: that the torrent does not cloy airgun is not false. sent10: if there exists something such that it cloys torrent then the pyxie does underquote innocence and it powderizes. sent11: the torrent does not approbate crayon if the neoconservative is a preciosity and does cloy airgun. sent12: that the neoconservative is a kind of a broadcloth hold. sent13: that something cloys torrent hold. sent14: if something does not approbate crayon then it is a kind of a broadcloth that cloys airgun. sent15: the neoconservative cloys airgun if it is a kind of a broadcloth. sent16: if the torrent is a kind of a preciosity that is a kind of a broadcloth the neoconservative does not approbate crayon.
sent15 & sent12 -> int1: the neoconservative does cloy airgun.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neoconservative approbates crayon.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the neoconservative cloys airgun and it does approbate crayon.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the torrent is not a preciosity.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pyxie cloys airgun is right.
sent14 -> int4: the pyxie is a broadcloth and does cloy airgun if it does not approbate crayon.; sent2 -> int5: if the pyxie does powderize and it is Mycenaean then it is not a kind of a preciosity.; sent13 & sent10 -> int6: the pyxie underquotes innocence and it powderizes.; int6 -> int7: the pyxie does powderize.; sent5 & sent3 -> int8: the torrent does not revamp.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the neoconservative is Mycenaean and/or is not barytic.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: that the pyxie is Mycenaean hold.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the pyxie powderizes and is Mycenaean.; int5 & int11 -> int12: the pyxie is not a preciosity.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the torrent is not a preciosity if the fact that the neoconservative approbates crayon hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the neoconservative is Mycenaean and/or is not barytic the pyxie is Mycenaean. sent2: if something does powderize and is Mycenaean then it is not a preciosity. sent3: that the torrent does not revamp hold if something that does not approbate demiglace is a kind of a linkage. sent4: the torrent does approbate crayon. sent5: something does not approbate demiglace but it is a linkage. sent6: the neoconservative is a preciosity if the torrent is a kind of a broadcloth. sent7: if the neoconservative cloys airgun and it approbates crayon the torrent is not a kind of a preciosity. sent8: if that the torrent does not revamp is right then the neoconservative is either Mycenaean or non-barytic or both. sent9: that the torrent does not cloy airgun is not false. sent10: if there exists something such that it cloys torrent then the pyxie does underquote innocence and it powderizes. sent11: the torrent does not approbate crayon if the neoconservative is a preciosity and does cloy airgun. sent12: that the neoconservative is a kind of a broadcloth hold. sent13: that something cloys torrent hold. sent14: if something does not approbate crayon then it is a kind of a broadcloth that cloys airgun. sent15: the neoconservative cloys airgun if it is a kind of a broadcloth. sent16: if the torrent is a kind of a preciosity that is a kind of a broadcloth the neoconservative does not approbate crayon. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent12 -> int1: the neoconservative does cloy airgun.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neoconservative approbates crayon.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the neoconservative cloys airgun and it does approbate crayon.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the torrent is not a preciosity.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__