the snag is a resemblance but it does not clap pfennig.
sent1: the bologna is not a porpoise. sent2: the snag claws haik. sent3: that the bologna is glad is not incorrect. sent4: the automat is a tobacco if it is sociolinguistic. sent5: there is something such that that that it is non-Gauguinesque a microsome is not incorrect is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the automat is a kind of a porpoise hold the firebase is sociolinguistic. sent7: the bologna does claw haik. sent8: the firebase does corrode thunderer if it is a kind of a porpoise. sent9: if there is something such that it claws haik the bologna corrodes unseen. sent10: the fact that the analgesic is Gauguinesque and is not a microsome does not hold. sent11: something is sociolinguistic if it is provencal. sent12: the ptyalism does corrode unseen if the bologna claws haik. sent13: something is Gauguinesque and/or does not corrode unseen if it is a microsome. sent14: if something does not claw haik that it is a kind of a resemblance that does not clap pfennig does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the snag claps pfennig but it is not outdoor is not correct it does not claps pfennig. sent16: the bologna does corrode unseen. sent17: that the bologna is a porpoise hold if the firebase does claw haik. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that it is not Gauguinesque and not a microsome does not hold then the firebase is a kind of a porpoise. sent19: the snag is a kind of a resemblance if the automat is a tobacco. sent20: if that something is Gauguinesque is true then it does not claw haik. sent21: the fact that the snag claps pfennig and is not outdoor is false. sent22: if the ptyalism does corrode unseen then that the analgesic is both not Gauguinesque and not a microsome is not true. sent23: The haik does claw bologna.
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the ptyalism does corrode unseen.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the fact that the analgesic is not Gauguinesque and it is not a microsome is false.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-Gauguinesque thing that is not a microsome does not hold.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the firebase is a porpoise.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the firebase corrodes thunderer.; sent15 & sent21 -> int6: the snag does not clap pfennig.;
the fact that the snag is a resemblance but it does not clap pfennig is not correct.
sent14 -> int7: that the snag is a resemblance but it does not clap pfennig is not right if it does not claw haik.; sent13 -> int8: the snag is Gauguinesque and/or does not corrode unseen if it is a microsome.; sent1 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a porpoise.; sent20 -> int10: if the snag is Gauguinesque it does not claw haik.;
$hypothesis$ = the snag is a resemblance but it does not clap pfennig. ; $context$ = sent1: the bologna is not a porpoise. sent2: the snag claws haik. sent3: that the bologna is glad is not incorrect. sent4: the automat is a tobacco if it is sociolinguistic. sent5: there is something such that that that it is non-Gauguinesque a microsome is not incorrect is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the automat is a kind of a porpoise hold the firebase is sociolinguistic. sent7: the bologna does claw haik. sent8: the firebase does corrode thunderer if it is a kind of a porpoise. sent9: if there is something such that it claws haik the bologna corrodes unseen. sent10: the fact that the analgesic is Gauguinesque and is not a microsome does not hold. sent11: something is sociolinguistic if it is provencal. sent12: the ptyalism does corrode unseen if the bologna claws haik. sent13: something is Gauguinesque and/or does not corrode unseen if it is a microsome. sent14: if something does not claw haik that it is a kind of a resemblance that does not clap pfennig does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the snag claps pfennig but it is not outdoor is not correct it does not claps pfennig. sent16: the bologna does corrode unseen. sent17: that the bologna is a porpoise hold if the firebase does claw haik. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that it is not Gauguinesque and not a microsome does not hold then the firebase is a kind of a porpoise. sent19: the snag is a kind of a resemblance if the automat is a tobacco. sent20: if that something is Gauguinesque is true then it does not claw haik. sent21: the fact that the snag claps pfennig and is not outdoor is false. sent22: if the ptyalism does corrode unseen then that the analgesic is both not Gauguinesque and not a microsome is not true. sent23: The haik does claw bologna. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the ptyalism does corrode unseen.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the fact that the analgesic is not Gauguinesque and it is not a microsome is false.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-Gauguinesque thing that is not a microsome does not hold.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the firebase is a porpoise.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the firebase corrodes thunderer.; sent15 & sent21 -> int6: the snag does not clap pfennig.; __UNKNOWN__