the keyhole is not covert.
sent1: if the fact that something is adducent and is not anadromous is not true then it is adducent. sent2: if there are non-cytological things then that the keyhole is a kind of a topped that does premeditate busyness is not right. sent3: the fact that the cassiterite conglutinates or it is covert or both does not hold if it is non-adducent. sent4: everything premeditates busyness and it is cytological. sent5: that the peptide premeditates busyness but it is not cytological does not hold if it does not conglutinate. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not multiform the lumberman is not nonvolatile. sent7: the oxford is not multiform. sent8: the fact that the cassiterite is adducent but it is not anadromous does not hold if the lumberman is not nonvolatile. sent9: the keyhole is not a covert if something does premeditate busyness and is cytological. sent10: if there is something such that that it is a topped and does premeditate busyness is not right the stockman is not a kind of a topped.
sent4 -> int1: the Ashkenazi premeditates busyness and it is cytological.; int1 -> int2: something premeditates busyness and is cytological.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the stockman does not top.
sent1 -> int3: if that the cassiterite is adducent but it is not anadromous is not right then it is not adducent.; sent7 -> int4: there is something such that it is not multiform.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the lumberman is not nonvolatile.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that the cassiterite is adducent and is not anadromous is false.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the cassiterite is non-adducent.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: that the cassiterite does conglutinate or it is a covert or both is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it does conglutinate and/or is not non-covert does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the keyhole is not covert. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is adducent and is not anadromous is not true then it is adducent. sent2: if there are non-cytological things then that the keyhole is a kind of a topped that does premeditate busyness is not right. sent3: the fact that the cassiterite conglutinates or it is covert or both does not hold if it is non-adducent. sent4: everything premeditates busyness and it is cytological. sent5: that the peptide premeditates busyness but it is not cytological does not hold if it does not conglutinate. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not multiform the lumberman is not nonvolatile. sent7: the oxford is not multiform. sent8: the fact that the cassiterite is adducent but it is not anadromous does not hold if the lumberman is not nonvolatile. sent9: the keyhole is not a covert if something does premeditate busyness and is cytological. sent10: if there is something such that that it is a topped and does premeditate busyness is not right the stockman is not a kind of a topped. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the Ashkenazi premeditates busyness and it is cytological.; int1 -> int2: something premeditates busyness and is cytological.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__