the colonoscope is a swindler.
sent1: the colonoscope allows if the fact that the joggle is a kind of a swindler is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it is an antidote and is non-nectar-rich. sent3: the gummite is not a Ethiopian. sent4: the schist does not preoccupy demurrage. sent5: the colonoscope is a swindler if something that is not a traineeship does not allow. sent6: there is something such that it is not a swindler and it allows. sent7: the gummite is not a swindler if there is something such that that it is a traineeship and does not allow does not hold. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it does allow and is not a kind of a swindler does not hold. sent9: if the colonoscope does allow that the gummite is a Ethiopian and is not a kind of a traineeship is wrong. sent10: something is not a traineeship and does allow. sent11: the gummite is a Ethiopian if it is a traineeship. sent12: the gummite does not allow if there is something such that the fact that it is a knob and is not tubercular is not correct. sent13: if there is something such that that it is Ethiopian but not a traineeship does not hold the fact that the region is a teardrop is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gummite is a traineeship hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the gummite is Ethiopian.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the gummite is not a traineeship.;
the region is a teardrop.
$hypothesis$ = the colonoscope is a swindler. ; $context$ = sent1: the colonoscope allows if the fact that the joggle is a kind of a swindler is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it is an antidote and is non-nectar-rich. sent3: the gummite is not a Ethiopian. sent4: the schist does not preoccupy demurrage. sent5: the colonoscope is a swindler if something that is not a traineeship does not allow. sent6: there is something such that it is not a swindler and it allows. sent7: the gummite is not a swindler if there is something such that that it is a traineeship and does not allow does not hold. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it does allow and is not a kind of a swindler does not hold. sent9: if the colonoscope does allow that the gummite is a Ethiopian and is not a kind of a traineeship is wrong. sent10: something is not a traineeship and does allow. sent11: the gummite is a Ethiopian if it is a traineeship. sent12: the gummite does not allow if there is something such that the fact that it is a knob and is not tubercular is not correct. sent13: if there is something such that that it is Ethiopian but not a traineeship does not hold the fact that the region is a teardrop is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gummite is a traineeship hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the gummite is Ethiopian.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the gummite is not a traineeship.; __UNKNOWN__