that the imposter is a kind of a love-in-winter but it does not nurse porkchop does not hold.
sent1: if something does become slattern then it is a bagel. sent2: there is something such that that that it is not a break and does demonstrate is not wrong is wrong. sent3: the imposter does not nurse porkchop if the ogler does not become poleax and is a kind of a superlative. sent4: the imposter is a kind of a kicksorter and is a rotenone. sent5: there exists something such that that it does not break and does not demonstrate is wrong. sent6: the isobar is a superlative if it is a kicksorter. sent7: if the diminution is a bagel then the isobar is a kind of a kicksorter. sent8: the whiteout does nurse porkchop if that the diminution is not a kind of a bagel and/or becomes slattern is false. sent9: the imposter is a Zizania. sent10: the imposter is a Zizania that is a kind of a love-in-winter. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a break and does not demonstrate is wrong. sent12: there is something such that it does not break and does not demonstrate. sent13: the ogler is a superlative if the isobar is a kind of a superlative. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not break and does not demonstrate is not right then the diminution becomes slattern. sent15: if the isobar is a superlative then the ogler does not become poleax and is a superlative. sent16: the fact that the diminution does become slattern hold if there is something such that it does demonstrate. sent17: the ogler is a kind of a superlative. sent18: the fact that that something does not become poleax and it is not a superlative is true is wrong if it is not a love-in-winter. sent19: the Lander is a superlative. sent20: the fact that something is not a bagel and/or it does become slattern is not correct if it is not a kicksorter.
sent5 & sent14 -> int1: the diminution becomes slattern.; sent1 -> int2: the diminution is a kind of a bagel if it becomes slattern.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the diminution is a kind of a bagel.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the isobar is a kicksorter.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the isobar is a kind of a superlative.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the ogler does not become poleax but it is a superlative.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the imposter does not nurse porkchop.; sent10 -> int8: the imposter is a love-in-winter.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the whiteout nurses porkchop.
sent18 -> int9: that the isobar does not become poleax and is not a kind of a superlative is not correct if it is not a love-in-winter.; sent20 -> int10: if the isobar is not a kicksorter then that it is not a bagel or it becomes slattern or both is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the imposter is a kind of a love-in-winter but it does not nurse porkchop does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does become slattern then it is a bagel. sent2: there is something such that that that it is not a break and does demonstrate is not wrong is wrong. sent3: the imposter does not nurse porkchop if the ogler does not become poleax and is a kind of a superlative. sent4: the imposter is a kind of a kicksorter and is a rotenone. sent5: there exists something such that that it does not break and does not demonstrate is wrong. sent6: the isobar is a superlative if it is a kicksorter. sent7: if the diminution is a bagel then the isobar is a kind of a kicksorter. sent8: the whiteout does nurse porkchop if that the diminution is not a kind of a bagel and/or becomes slattern is false. sent9: the imposter is a Zizania. sent10: the imposter is a Zizania that is a kind of a love-in-winter. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a break and does not demonstrate is wrong. sent12: there is something such that it does not break and does not demonstrate. sent13: the ogler is a superlative if the isobar is a kind of a superlative. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not break and does not demonstrate is not right then the diminution becomes slattern. sent15: if the isobar is a superlative then the ogler does not become poleax and is a superlative. sent16: the fact that the diminution does become slattern hold if there is something such that it does demonstrate. sent17: the ogler is a kind of a superlative. sent18: the fact that that something does not become poleax and it is not a superlative is true is wrong if it is not a love-in-winter. sent19: the Lander is a superlative. sent20: the fact that something is not a bagel and/or it does become slattern is not correct if it is not a kicksorter. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent14 -> int1: the diminution becomes slattern.; sent1 -> int2: the diminution is a kind of a bagel if it becomes slattern.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the diminution is a kind of a bagel.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the isobar is a kicksorter.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the isobar is a kind of a superlative.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the ogler does not become poleax but it is a superlative.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the imposter does not nurse porkchop.; sent10 -> int8: the imposter is a love-in-winter.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__