the fact that the non-indiscriminateness and the aestheticness occurs is false if the upholding pachuco occurs.
sent1: the blocking occurs if the blue-collarness occurs. sent2: the fact that both the non-indiscriminateness and the aesthetic occurs is wrong if the blocking occurs. sent3: the blue-collarness happens if that both the sweating and the non-diffuseness happens does not hold. sent4: that both the indiscriminateness and the aestheticness occurs is wrong if the blocking happens. sent5: if the upholding pademelon does not occur the fact that the sweat and the non-diffuseness occurs is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the upholding pachuco happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the upholding pademelon occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the upholding pademelon occurs and/or the upholding DMZ occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the non-indiscriminateness and the aestheticness occurs is false if the upholding pachuco occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the blocking occurs if the blue-collarness occurs. sent2: the fact that both the non-indiscriminateness and the aesthetic occurs is wrong if the blocking occurs. sent3: the blue-collarness happens if that both the sweating and the non-diffuseness happens does not hold. sent4: that both the indiscriminateness and the aestheticness occurs is wrong if the blocking happens. sent5: if the upholding pademelon does not occur the fact that the sweat and the non-diffuseness occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the upholding pachuco happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the upholding pademelon occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the upholding pademelon occurs and/or the upholding DMZ occurs.; __UNKNOWN__