the videotape occurs.
sent1: the videotaping is prevented by that the formation and the rubifying happens. sent2: the enlivening Baltic happens and the enlivening Upanishad happens if the relief does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the part-timeness happens and the enlivening Baltic does not occur is false then the rubifying happens. sent4: either the videotaping occurs or the rubifying does not occur or both if the part-timeness does not occur. sent5: that the part-timeness occurs and the enlivening Baltic does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the enlivening Bunche does not occur is correct if the formation does not occur and the furrowing cetacean does not occur. sent7: the furrowing cetacean occurs and the formation occurs.
sent7 -> int1: the formation occurs.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the rubifying occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the formation and the rubifying happens.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the enlivening Bunche does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = the videotape occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the videotaping is prevented by that the formation and the rubifying happens. sent2: the enlivening Baltic happens and the enlivening Upanishad happens if the relief does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the part-timeness happens and the enlivening Baltic does not occur is false then the rubifying happens. sent4: either the videotaping occurs or the rubifying does not occur or both if the part-timeness does not occur. sent5: that the part-timeness occurs and the enlivening Baltic does not occur does not hold. sent6: that the enlivening Bunche does not occur is correct if the formation does not occur and the furrowing cetacean does not occur. sent7: the furrowing cetacean occurs and the formation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the formation occurs.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the rubifying occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the formation and the rubifying happens.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__