the schrod is not allomerous.
sent1: something scorches property if that it is a falsehood hold. sent2: if there is something such that it is not branchy and does not scorch property the schrod is allomerous. sent3: if the fact that something is non-gluteal thing that does not scorch electrotherapy does not hold the fact that it does kennel lavage is correct. sent4: something does kennel lavage. sent5: that the koumiss scorches electrotherapy but it is not gluteal is not wrong if something kennels lavage. sent6: something is nonhuman but it is not a recompense if it does kennel lavage. sent7: if something that scorches electrotherapy is not gluteal the touch-typist is a falsehood. sent8: the finisher is a kind of non-branchy thing that does not scorch property if the touch-typist does scorch property.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the koumiss does scorch electrotherapy and is not gluteal.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it scorches electrotherapy and it is not gluteal is correct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the touch-typist is a falsehood.; sent1 -> int4: the touch-typist scorches property if that it is a falsehood is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the touch-typist does scorch property.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the finisher is a kind of non-branchy thing that does not scorch property.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is not branchy and it does not scorch property is not incorrect.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it is nonhuman and it is not a recompense.
sent6 -> int8: the touch-typist is not human and is not a recompense if it does kennel lavage.; sent3 -> int9: if the fact that the touch-typist is not gluteal and it does not scorch electrotherapy is false that it kennels lavage is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the schrod is not allomerous. ; $context$ = sent1: something scorches property if that it is a falsehood hold. sent2: if there is something such that it is not branchy and does not scorch property the schrod is allomerous. sent3: if the fact that something is non-gluteal thing that does not scorch electrotherapy does not hold the fact that it does kennel lavage is correct. sent4: something does kennel lavage. sent5: that the koumiss scorches electrotherapy but it is not gluteal is not wrong if something kennels lavage. sent6: something is nonhuman but it is not a recompense if it does kennel lavage. sent7: if something that scorches electrotherapy is not gluteal the touch-typist is a falsehood. sent8: the finisher is a kind of non-branchy thing that does not scorch property if the touch-typist does scorch property. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the koumiss does scorch electrotherapy and is not gluteal.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it scorches electrotherapy and it is not gluteal is correct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the touch-typist is a falsehood.; sent1 -> int4: the touch-typist scorches property if that it is a falsehood is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the touch-typist does scorch property.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the finisher is a kind of non-branchy thing that does not scorch property.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is not branchy and it does not scorch property is not incorrect.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__