the fact that there exists something such that that it is Platonistic and is a contrariety does not hold does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that it is both Platonistic and a contrariety. sent2: that the phrontistery does not reflectorize habited but it is a kind of an electrician is wrong if the olivenite reflectorizes millivolt. sent3: the firehouse is a contrariety and/or it reflectorizes millivolt. sent4: the awn does not reflectorize Muhammad. sent5: the awn is not a kind of an electrician. sent6: if the olivenite does table or is a Terpsichore or both then it is not a kind of an electrician. sent7: something is a contrariety that does reflectorize millivolt if it is not Platonistic. sent8: the olivenite is a kind of a table and/or it is a kind of a Terpsichore. sent9: the awn does not reflectorize millivolt. sent10: there exists something such that it does not reflectorize Muhammad. sent11: the awn is not Platonistic if it is an electrician. sent12: the radial does not reflectorize Muhammad and does reflectorize habited if the olivenite is not an electrician. sent13: if something does not reflectorize Muhammad but it does reflectorize habited the firehouse does not reflectorize millivolt. sent14: something reflectorizes Muhammad and it reflectorizes habited. sent15: there is something such that that it is a etamine and it is not a kind of a Pauling is wrong. sent16: there exists something such that that it reflectorizes habited is right. sent17: the olivenite is a table or it reflectorizes habited or both. sent18: if the olivenite is not an electrician the radial does reflectorize habited. sent19: if that something is not a Sundanese or it is a fishplate or both is false it is not Platonistic. sent20: that that the olivenite is not a Sundanese and/or it is a fishplate hold does not hold if the radial is not a souse. sent21: something is not coherent but it is a kind of a caribou. sent22: the radial reflectorizes habited. sent23: the olivenite is not a kind of an electrician if it tables. sent24: the fact that the awn is Platonistic and it is a kind of a contrariety is not true if the firehouse does not reflectorize millivolt.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the olivenite is not a kind of an electrician.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the radial does not reflectorize Muhammad but it does reflectorize habited.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does not reflectorize Muhammad and reflectorizes habited.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the firehouse does not reflectorize millivolt.; sent24 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the awn is a kind of Platonistic thing that is a contrariety is incorrect.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the phrontistery does not reflectorize Muhammad.
sent7 -> int6: the olivenite is a contrariety and it does reflectorize millivolt if it is not Platonistic.; sent19 -> int7: if the fact that the olivenite is not a kind of a Sundanese or is a kind of a fishplate or both does not hold that it is not Platonistic hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it is Platonistic and is a contrariety does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is both Platonistic and a contrariety. sent2: that the phrontistery does not reflectorize habited but it is a kind of an electrician is wrong if the olivenite reflectorizes millivolt. sent3: the firehouse is a contrariety and/or it reflectorizes millivolt. sent4: the awn does not reflectorize Muhammad. sent5: the awn is not a kind of an electrician. sent6: if the olivenite does table or is a Terpsichore or both then it is not a kind of an electrician. sent7: something is a contrariety that does reflectorize millivolt if it is not Platonistic. sent8: the olivenite is a kind of a table and/or it is a kind of a Terpsichore. sent9: the awn does not reflectorize millivolt. sent10: there exists something such that it does not reflectorize Muhammad. sent11: the awn is not Platonistic if it is an electrician. sent12: the radial does not reflectorize Muhammad and does reflectorize habited if the olivenite is not an electrician. sent13: if something does not reflectorize Muhammad but it does reflectorize habited the firehouse does not reflectorize millivolt. sent14: something reflectorizes Muhammad and it reflectorizes habited. sent15: there is something such that that it is a etamine and it is not a kind of a Pauling is wrong. sent16: there exists something such that that it reflectorizes habited is right. sent17: the olivenite is a table or it reflectorizes habited or both. sent18: if the olivenite is not an electrician the radial does reflectorize habited. sent19: if that something is not a Sundanese or it is a fishplate or both is false it is not Platonistic. sent20: that that the olivenite is not a Sundanese and/or it is a fishplate hold does not hold if the radial is not a souse. sent21: something is not coherent but it is a kind of a caribou. sent22: the radial reflectorizes habited. sent23: the olivenite is not a kind of an electrician if it tables. sent24: the fact that the awn is Platonistic and it is a kind of a contrariety is not true if the firehouse does not reflectorize millivolt. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the olivenite is not a kind of an electrician.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the radial does not reflectorize Muhammad but it does reflectorize habited.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does not reflectorize Muhammad and reflectorizes habited.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the firehouse does not reflectorize millivolt.; sent24 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the awn is a kind of Platonistic thing that is a contrariety is incorrect.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__