that the intestine does not twine Rachycentridae and does not swell is incorrect.
sent1: if the intestine is not a spread the potato spread and twines punctum. sent2: the gneiss is a antiproton. sent3: the gneiss is not a swelling if the intestine is a Durkheim. sent4: the cauliflower is not a kind of a rigging. sent5: that the gneiss is a kind of a spread but it is not a Durkheim does not hold. sent6: the fact that the gneiss is not a kind of a Durkheim and does not twine cauliflower is not true. sent7: the gneiss is a Durkheim if the intestine is not a Durkheim. sent8: the potato does not impale if that it does not twine irrepressibility and it does not twine cauliflower is incorrect. sent9: if the potato spreads then the gneiss is not a swelling. sent10: the gneiss is not a spread if the intestine twines cauliflower or is a Durkheim or both. sent11: everything is a kind of a Durkheim. sent12: if that the potato does twine punctum and/or it twines cauliflower is not wrong the gneiss is not a Durkheim. sent13: that the potato is not a swelling and does not twine punctum does not hold. sent14: if something is episcopal it is not a threadfin. sent15: if the fact that something does not twine Rachycentridae and it does not swell is not true the fact that it is not a kind of a spread is not incorrect. sent16: the intestine is a kind of a Durkheim if the gneiss is not a kind of a Durkheim.
sent15 -> int1: if that the intestine does not twine Rachycentridae and is not a kind of a swelling is false then it is not a spread.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the intestine does not twine Rachycentridae and is not a swelling does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the intestine does not spread.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the potato is a kind of a spread that does twine punctum.; int3 -> int4: the potato twines punctum.; int4 -> int5: the potato twines punctum or it twines cauliflower or both.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the gneiss is not a kind of a Durkheim.; sent11 -> int7: the gneiss is a Durkheim.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the intestine does not twine Rachycentridae and does not swell is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the intestine is not a spread the potato spread and twines punctum. sent2: the gneiss is a antiproton. sent3: the gneiss is not a swelling if the intestine is a Durkheim. sent4: the cauliflower is not a kind of a rigging. sent5: that the gneiss is a kind of a spread but it is not a Durkheim does not hold. sent6: the fact that the gneiss is not a kind of a Durkheim and does not twine cauliflower is not true. sent7: the gneiss is a Durkheim if the intestine is not a Durkheim. sent8: the potato does not impale if that it does not twine irrepressibility and it does not twine cauliflower is incorrect. sent9: if the potato spreads then the gneiss is not a swelling. sent10: the gneiss is not a spread if the intestine twines cauliflower or is a Durkheim or both. sent11: everything is a kind of a Durkheim. sent12: if that the potato does twine punctum and/or it twines cauliflower is not wrong the gneiss is not a Durkheim. sent13: that the potato is not a swelling and does not twine punctum does not hold. sent14: if something is episcopal it is not a threadfin. sent15: if the fact that something does not twine Rachycentridae and it does not swell is not true the fact that it is not a kind of a spread is not incorrect. sent16: the intestine is a kind of a Durkheim if the gneiss is not a kind of a Durkheim. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if that the intestine does not twine Rachycentridae and is not a kind of a swelling is false then it is not a spread.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the intestine does not twine Rachycentridae and is not a swelling does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the intestine does not spread.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the potato is a kind of a spread that does twine punctum.; int3 -> int4: the potato twines punctum.; int4 -> int5: the potato twines punctum or it twines cauliflower or both.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the gneiss is not a kind of a Durkheim.; sent11 -> int7: the gneiss is a Durkheim.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__