the moray is torrential.
sent1: the GB wilts. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a millidegree the hoister is a benediction and it is a weald. sent3: the moray is not torrential if the luffa fingerprints diaper and it does wilt. sent4: the hoister is not a kind of a millidegree if it is not a cavalla. sent5: if something does not fingerprint diaper but it is a benediction it does catalyze Doronicum. sent6: there exists something such that it is disproportionate. sent7: the hoister is a kind of recombinant thing that is nonalcoholic. sent8: the hoister is a kind of a recombinant if it is not a weald and it is nonalcoholic. sent9: the secessionist is a kind of a weald if there exists something such that it is disproportionate. sent10: if the secessionist is not a benediction and is not disproportionate that the moray is torrential is not false. sent11: the secessionist is a kind of a weald. sent12: the hoister is nonalcoholic. sent13: the axolotl is dysphemistic and it is a kind of a cavity. sent14: the luffa fingerprints diaper. sent15: if something is both not a millidegree and a recombinant then it does catalyze Doronicum. sent16: if something is disproportionate then the secessionist is a kind of a benediction and it is a kind of a weald. sent17: The diaper fingerprints luffa. sent18: the fact that the luffa wilts is not incorrect if the hoister does catalyze Doronicum. sent19: the luffa is not a millidegree if the hoister does catalyze Doronicum and it does fingerprint diaper. sent20: that the hoister is a despair is not false. sent21: that the secessionist is torrential is not false. sent22: the hoister is not a cavalla if the secessionist is a kind of a benediction that is a weald.
sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the secessionist is a benediction and it is a kind of a weald.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the hoister is not a kind of a cavalla.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the hoister is not a millidegree.; sent7 -> int4: the hoister is a recombinant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hoister is not a millidegree but it is a recombinant.; sent15 -> int6: if the hoister is not a millidegree and is a recombinant then it catalyzes Doronicum.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the hoister does catalyze Doronicum.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the luffa is a kind of a wilt.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the luffa does fingerprint diaper and is a wilt.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
that the moray is torrential is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the moray is torrential. ; $context$ = sent1: the GB wilts. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a millidegree the hoister is a benediction and it is a weald. sent3: the moray is not torrential if the luffa fingerprints diaper and it does wilt. sent4: the hoister is not a kind of a millidegree if it is not a cavalla. sent5: if something does not fingerprint diaper but it is a benediction it does catalyze Doronicum. sent6: there exists something such that it is disproportionate. sent7: the hoister is a kind of recombinant thing that is nonalcoholic. sent8: the hoister is a kind of a recombinant if it is not a weald and it is nonalcoholic. sent9: the secessionist is a kind of a weald if there exists something such that it is disproportionate. sent10: if the secessionist is not a benediction and is not disproportionate that the moray is torrential is not false. sent11: the secessionist is a kind of a weald. sent12: the hoister is nonalcoholic. sent13: the axolotl is dysphemistic and it is a kind of a cavity. sent14: the luffa fingerprints diaper. sent15: if something is both not a millidegree and a recombinant then it does catalyze Doronicum. sent16: if something is disproportionate then the secessionist is a kind of a benediction and it is a kind of a weald. sent17: The diaper fingerprints luffa. sent18: the fact that the luffa wilts is not incorrect if the hoister does catalyze Doronicum. sent19: the luffa is not a millidegree if the hoister does catalyze Doronicum and it does fingerprint diaper. sent20: that the hoister is a despair is not false. sent21: that the secessionist is torrential is not false. sent22: the hoister is not a cavalla if the secessionist is a kind of a benediction that is a weald. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the secessionist is a benediction and it is a kind of a weald.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the hoister is not a kind of a cavalla.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the hoister is not a millidegree.; sent7 -> int4: the hoister is a recombinant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hoister is not a millidegree but it is a recombinant.; sent15 -> int6: if the hoister is not a millidegree and is a recombinant then it catalyzes Doronicum.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the hoister does catalyze Doronicum.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the luffa is a kind of a wilt.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the luffa does fingerprint diaper and is a wilt.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__