not the payment but the overpowering stifle occurs.
sent1: the infallibleness occurs. sent2: the overpowering Echo occurs if both the Demotic and the bedlessness occurs. sent3: the fact that the liplessness happens and the barbing poetess happens is not true. sent4: the tagging does not occur. sent5: the calico does not occur and the klondike does not occur if the barbing poetess happens. sent6: the payment does not occur. sent7: the despite occurs if the bedlessness occurs and the thrum occurs. sent8: the caliconess does not occur if both the barbing poetess and the imperative happens. sent9: the klondike and the ctenoidness happens if that the caliconess does not occur is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the klondike occurs hold if the payment does not occur and the overpowering stifle happens. sent11: the Demoticness does not occur. sent12: the barbing sharpness does not occur and the hair-raiser happens. sent13: that the non-stellarness and the pyroligneousness happens prevents that the calcicness does not occur. sent14: that the arousing radon does not occur is prevented by that both the barbing Neosporin and the overpowering mytilid occurs. sent15: if the sepaloidness does not occur both the arousing barbell and the barbing poetess happens. sent16: the overpowering abashment does not occur. sent17: if both the parley and the topping happens then the kickoff occurs. sent18: the fact that the fact that the payment and the overpowering stifle occurs is not right is right. sent19: if both the payment and the overpowering stifle occurs then the klondike occurs. sent20: the payment does not occur if the caliconess does not occur and the klondike does not occur. sent21: the klondike does not occur. sent22: if the klondike occurs and the ctenoidness happens the fact that the ceramicsness does not occur is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the payment does not occur but the overpowering stifle occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the klondike happens.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the ceramicsness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = not the payment but the overpowering stifle occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the infallibleness occurs. sent2: the overpowering Echo occurs if both the Demotic and the bedlessness occurs. sent3: the fact that the liplessness happens and the barbing poetess happens is not true. sent4: the tagging does not occur. sent5: the calico does not occur and the klondike does not occur if the barbing poetess happens. sent6: the payment does not occur. sent7: the despite occurs if the bedlessness occurs and the thrum occurs. sent8: the caliconess does not occur if both the barbing poetess and the imperative happens. sent9: the klondike and the ctenoidness happens if that the caliconess does not occur is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the klondike occurs hold if the payment does not occur and the overpowering stifle happens. sent11: the Demoticness does not occur. sent12: the barbing sharpness does not occur and the hair-raiser happens. sent13: that the non-stellarness and the pyroligneousness happens prevents that the calcicness does not occur. sent14: that the arousing radon does not occur is prevented by that both the barbing Neosporin and the overpowering mytilid occurs. sent15: if the sepaloidness does not occur both the arousing barbell and the barbing poetess happens. sent16: the overpowering abashment does not occur. sent17: if both the parley and the topping happens then the kickoff occurs. sent18: the fact that the fact that the payment and the overpowering stifle occurs is not right is right. sent19: if both the payment and the overpowering stifle occurs then the klondike occurs. sent20: the payment does not occur if the caliconess does not occur and the klondike does not occur. sent21: the klondike does not occur. sent22: if the klondike occurs and the ctenoidness happens the fact that the ceramicsness does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the payment does not occur but the overpowering stifle occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the klondike happens.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__