the fact that that the activation does not occur is prevented by that the yaw occurs is false.
sent1: the outing occurs if the cardiologicness happens. sent2: that both the yawing and the galling anapsid occurs is caused by that the reeking happens. sent3: the galling camlet does not occur. sent4: the pragmatics does not occur. sent5: if the horariness occurs the activation occurs. sent6: that the destaining Laplace does not occur is prevented by that the galling Damascene occurs. sent7: if the smacker happens the activation occurs. sent8: if the muffing Oedipus happens the sensing happens. sent9: if the reeking occurs then the yawing does not occur but the galling anapsid happens. sent10: the muffing lilliputian does not occur. sent11: the yaw and the galling anapsid occurs. sent12: the imperativeness occurs if the sounding feculence occurs. sent13: the chiromanticness does not occur. sent14: that the mutilation occurs causes the disjointing. sent15: that the reeking does not occur leads to either the horariness or the smacker or both. sent16: the fact that the galling anapsid happens is not incorrect. sent17: if the smacker does not occur and the reeking does not occur the amenorrheicness does not occur. sent18: if the reeking happens the galling anapsid happens. sent19: the sounding ameba does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the yaw happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reeking occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the yawing but the galling anapsid occurs is true.; int1 -> int2: the yawing does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the reeking does not occur is not incorrect.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the horariness and/or the smacker occurs.; int5 & sent5 & sent7 -> int6: that the activation occurs is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
not the amenorrheicness but the mitoticness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the activation does not occur is prevented by that the yaw occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the outing occurs if the cardiologicness happens. sent2: that both the yawing and the galling anapsid occurs is caused by that the reeking happens. sent3: the galling camlet does not occur. sent4: the pragmatics does not occur. sent5: if the horariness occurs the activation occurs. sent6: that the destaining Laplace does not occur is prevented by that the galling Damascene occurs. sent7: if the smacker happens the activation occurs. sent8: if the muffing Oedipus happens the sensing happens. sent9: if the reeking occurs then the yawing does not occur but the galling anapsid happens. sent10: the muffing lilliputian does not occur. sent11: the yaw and the galling anapsid occurs. sent12: the imperativeness occurs if the sounding feculence occurs. sent13: the chiromanticness does not occur. sent14: that the mutilation occurs causes the disjointing. sent15: that the reeking does not occur leads to either the horariness or the smacker or both. sent16: the fact that the galling anapsid happens is not incorrect. sent17: if the smacker does not occur and the reeking does not occur the amenorrheicness does not occur. sent18: if the reeking happens the galling anapsid happens. sent19: the sounding ameba does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the yaw happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reeking occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the yawing but the galling anapsid occurs is true.; int1 -> int2: the yawing does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the reeking does not occur is not incorrect.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the horariness and/or the smacker occurs.; int5 & sent5 & sent7 -> int6: that the activation occurs is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__