that the pantothen is not postmeridian and it is not a cuneiform is false.
sent1: something that is a trace is instructional. sent2: that something is not postmeridian and is a kind of a cuneiform is not correct if it is a kind of a Cephalotus. sent3: that the pantothen is postmeridian but it is non-cuneiform does not hold. sent4: if something is a Cephalotus then that it is not postmeridian and it is not a cuneiform is wrong. sent5: if something is a Cephalotus that it is postmeridian and it is not a kind of a cuneiform does not hold. sent6: if the pantothen is a Cephalotus the fact that it is not postmeridian and it is cuneiform is not correct. sent7: that the spallation is not sepaloid or it does reprise Abadan or both is incorrect. sent8: if that the clomipramine is Baptistic hold then the chalcidfly canes. sent9: the commissioner is a monarch if the spallation is Turkic. sent10: the fact that the pantothen is not rotatory and it is not a kind of a cuneiform is false if it is calcic. sent11: the pantothen is nontaxable. sent12: if something is both nontaxable and not robotic then it is a Cephalotus. sent13: that if the reveler is instructional the clomipramine is Baptistic is not wrong. sent14: something is a trace if it is a monarch. sent15: that the pantothen is not postmeridian but it is a kind of a cuneiform is false. sent16: if the gearbox is a Cephalotus then the pantothen is non-postmeridian thing that is not cuneiform. sent17: that the pantothen is not a kind of a Cephalotus and it is not a kind of a nipa is not true if it is not non-calcic. sent18: that something is non-earlier and stares Altair does not hold if it is a cane. sent19: if the fact that the commissioner is a monarch hold then the reveler is a kind of a monarch. sent20: if the pantothen is a kind of a Cephalotus that it is postmeridian thing that is not cuneiform does not hold. sent21: if the fact that either something is not sepaloid or it does reprise Abadan or both is wrong then it is Turkic. sent22: the pantothen is not robotic.
sent12 -> int1: if the pantothen is nontaxable but not robotic the fact that it is a Cephalotus is not incorrect.; sent11 & sent22 -> int2: the pantothen is nontaxable but it is not robotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pantothen is a Cephalotus.; sent4 -> int4: if the pantothen is a Cephalotus then that it is both not postmeridian and not a cuneiform is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the pantothen is not postmeridian and it is non-cuneiform.
sent18 -> int5: the fact that the chalcidfly is not earlier but it stares Altair does not hold if it is a cane.; sent1 -> int6: the fact that the reveler is instructional is correct if it does trace.; sent14 -> int7: the reveler is a kind of a trace if it is a kind of a monarch.; sent21 -> int8: if the fact that the fact that either the spallation is not sepaloid or it reprises Abadan or both hold is wrong it is Turkic.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the spallation is Turkic.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the commissioner is a monarch.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: the reveler is a monarch.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the reveler is a kind of a trace.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the reveler is instructional.; sent13 & int13 -> int14: the clomipramine is Baptistic.; sent8 & int14 -> int15: the chalcidfly does cane.; int5 & int15 -> int16: the fact that that the chalcidfly is not earlier and does stare Altair does not hold is not false.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that the fact that it is not earlier and it does stare Altair does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pantothen is not postmeridian and it is not a cuneiform is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is a trace is instructional. sent2: that something is not postmeridian and is a kind of a cuneiform is not correct if it is a kind of a Cephalotus. sent3: that the pantothen is postmeridian but it is non-cuneiform does not hold. sent4: if something is a Cephalotus then that it is not postmeridian and it is not a cuneiform is wrong. sent5: if something is a Cephalotus that it is postmeridian and it is not a kind of a cuneiform does not hold. sent6: if the pantothen is a Cephalotus the fact that it is not postmeridian and it is cuneiform is not correct. sent7: that the spallation is not sepaloid or it does reprise Abadan or both is incorrect. sent8: if that the clomipramine is Baptistic hold then the chalcidfly canes. sent9: the commissioner is a monarch if the spallation is Turkic. sent10: the fact that the pantothen is not rotatory and it is not a kind of a cuneiform is false if it is calcic. sent11: the pantothen is nontaxable. sent12: if something is both nontaxable and not robotic then it is a Cephalotus. sent13: that if the reveler is instructional the clomipramine is Baptistic is not wrong. sent14: something is a trace if it is a monarch. sent15: that the pantothen is not postmeridian but it is a kind of a cuneiform is false. sent16: if the gearbox is a Cephalotus then the pantothen is non-postmeridian thing that is not cuneiform. sent17: that the pantothen is not a kind of a Cephalotus and it is not a kind of a nipa is not true if it is not non-calcic. sent18: that something is non-earlier and stares Altair does not hold if it is a cane. sent19: if the fact that the commissioner is a monarch hold then the reveler is a kind of a monarch. sent20: if the pantothen is a kind of a Cephalotus that it is postmeridian thing that is not cuneiform does not hold. sent21: if the fact that either something is not sepaloid or it does reprise Abadan or both is wrong then it is Turkic. sent22: the pantothen is not robotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the pantothen is nontaxable but not robotic the fact that it is a Cephalotus is not incorrect.; sent11 & sent22 -> int2: the pantothen is nontaxable but it is not robotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pantothen is a Cephalotus.; sent4 -> int4: if the pantothen is a Cephalotus then that it is both not postmeridian and not a cuneiform is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__