the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a stickiness the fact that it does judder and it is a ragamuffin does not hold does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the asparagine judders and it is a ragamuffin is incorrect if it is a stickiness. sent2: that something does judder and is a kind of a ragamuffin is wrong if it is a stickiness. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a stickiness the fact that it does judder and it is a kind of a ragamuffin is not true. sent4: if something is not a kind of a stickiness then the fact that it judders and is a kind of a ragamuffin is wrong. sent5: that the asparagine is homemade and it judders does not hold if it is not comprehensive. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a porcelain the fact that it clanks butt-weld and is extraterritorial is not right. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not consort Gagarin the fact that that it is a Carbondale and it does consort conduit is correct does not hold hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a stickiness then it judders and it is a ragamuffin. sent9: if the asparagine is not a stickiness it does judder and it is a ragamuffin. sent10: something does judder and it is a ragamuffin if it is not a kind of a stickiness. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not consort inattention then the fact that it is a Paradoxurus and a foothold is not true. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not achenial is right then the fact that it is gymnastic and is a porcelain is not right.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the asparagine does judder and is a ragamuffin is not true if it is not a stickiness.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a stickiness the fact that it does judder and it is a ragamuffin does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the asparagine judders and it is a ragamuffin is incorrect if it is a stickiness. sent2: that something does judder and is a kind of a ragamuffin is wrong if it is a stickiness. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a stickiness the fact that it does judder and it is a kind of a ragamuffin is not true. sent4: if something is not a kind of a stickiness then the fact that it judders and is a kind of a ragamuffin is wrong. sent5: that the asparagine is homemade and it judders does not hold if it is not comprehensive. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a porcelain the fact that it clanks butt-weld and is extraterritorial is not right. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not consort Gagarin the fact that that it is a Carbondale and it does consort conduit is correct does not hold hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a stickiness then it judders and it is a ragamuffin. sent9: if the asparagine is not a stickiness it does judder and it is a ragamuffin. sent10: something does judder and it is a ragamuffin if it is not a kind of a stickiness. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not consort inattention then the fact that it is a Paradoxurus and a foothold is not true. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not achenial is right then the fact that it is gymnastic and is a porcelain is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the asparagine does judder and is a ragamuffin is not true if it is not a stickiness.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__