that the TRH is a scapular and/or a settled is incorrect.
sent1: if something twills Smollett but it is not a Montgolfier then the NGF is not an elegy. sent2: something twills Smollett and is not a Montgolfier if it is not a semi-abstraction. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Montgolfier. sent4: if something is not a diphenylhydantoin the fact that it is a semi-abstraction and not a balk is false. sent5: the NGF is not a diphenylhydantoin if that the casquet is both not an elegy and not a balk is not correct. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Montgolfier the frontal does twill Smollett. sent7: the frontal twills Smollett and it is a kind of a semi-abstraction if something is a Montgolfier. sent8: that the TRH is scapular or it settles or both is false if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a diphenylhydantoin. sent9: the Bluegrass is not an elegy if the frontal is a semi-abstraction. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a settled and it is a kind of a diphenylhydantoin is false.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the frontal twills Smollett and it is a semi-abstraction.; int1 -> int2: the frontal is a semi-abstraction.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the Bluegrass is not an elegy.;
the NGF is not an elegy.
sent2 -> int4: the frontal twills Smollett but it is not a Montgolfier if it is not a semi-abstraction.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the Bluegrass is a kind of a semi-abstraction that is not a kind of a balk is not correct if it is not a kind of a diphenylhydantoin.;
$hypothesis$ = that the TRH is a scapular and/or a settled is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something twills Smollett but it is not a Montgolfier then the NGF is not an elegy. sent2: something twills Smollett and is not a Montgolfier if it is not a semi-abstraction. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Montgolfier. sent4: if something is not a diphenylhydantoin the fact that it is a semi-abstraction and not a balk is false. sent5: the NGF is not a diphenylhydantoin if that the casquet is both not an elegy and not a balk is not correct. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Montgolfier the frontal does twill Smollett. sent7: the frontal twills Smollett and it is a kind of a semi-abstraction if something is a Montgolfier. sent8: that the TRH is scapular or it settles or both is false if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a diphenylhydantoin. sent9: the Bluegrass is not an elegy if the frontal is a semi-abstraction. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a settled and it is a kind of a diphenylhydantoin is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the frontal twills Smollett and it is a semi-abstraction.; int1 -> int2: the frontal is a semi-abstraction.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the Bluegrass is not an elegy.; __UNKNOWN__