there is something such that if it is unmilitary the fact that it does not fry and/or it is inexhaustible is not right.
sent1: the fact that if the cellulose is attractive then the cellulose is unmilitary is right. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not non-configurational it is a Edward is not false. sent3: if something is unmilitary that it does not fry and/or it is inexhaustible does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is connate either it does not strengthen Burton or it is anal or both. sent5: if the cellulose strengthens Malone then that it does not fry and/or is a melancholy does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a hulk then it is a kind of a diplomate. sent7: there is something such that if it does disentangle Actinidia the fact that it is not a dispatch and/or it is animating is not correct. sent8: the cellulose is not inexhaustible if it is unmilitary. sent9: something does not disentangle affixation or it is dermal or both if it does buzz.
sent3 -> int1: that if the cellulose is unmilitary that the fact that the cellulose does not fry or it is not exhaustible or both does not hold is correct is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is unmilitary the fact that it does not fry and/or it is inexhaustible is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the cellulose is attractive then the cellulose is unmilitary is right. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not non-configurational it is a Edward is not false. sent3: if something is unmilitary that it does not fry and/or it is inexhaustible does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is connate either it does not strengthen Burton or it is anal or both. sent5: if the cellulose strengthens Malone then that it does not fry and/or is a melancholy does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a hulk then it is a kind of a diplomate. sent7: there is something such that if it does disentangle Actinidia the fact that it is not a dispatch and/or it is animating is not correct. sent8: the cellulose is not inexhaustible if it is unmilitary. sent9: something does not disentangle affixation or it is dermal or both if it does buzz. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that if the cellulose is unmilitary that the fact that the cellulose does not fry or it is not exhaustible or both does not hold is correct is right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__