that the non-metastableness causes that the criticizing half-holiday and the clip-clop occurs is not right.
sent1: the sliding happens. sent2: the finalizing encyclical does not occur. sent3: the extragalacticness does not occur if the funambulism does not occur. sent4: either the capableness or the seaquake or both happens. sent5: if the upholding hot-rod does not occur that the finalizing hemoprotein happens and the extragalacticness happens is not incorrect. sent6: the carangidness does not occur. sent7: if the upholding hot-rod does not occur then the finalizing hemoprotein happens. sent8: the buckling happens if the rewarding does not occur. sent9: the finalizing Tinca does not occur. sent10: the craning porosity prevents that the unconquerableness does not occur. sent11: the upholding hot-rod does not occur. sent12: either the diplomaticness or the criticizing baklava or both occurs. sent13: that the unenthusiasticness does not occur causes the non-calendricness. sent14: if that the pulsation does not occur and the modality happens is not incorrect then the finalizing Tinca does not occur. sent15: if the yips does not occur but the pretense occurs the fact that the lidlessness does not occur is not false. sent16: that that the funambulism does not occur is triggered by that the criticizing half-holiday does not occur and the metastableness does not occur is not incorrect. sent17: the lingual does not occur. sent18: the argillaceousness does not occur. sent19: if the criticizing baklava occurs the clip-clop occurs. sent20: the episcopalness does not occur. sent21: that the diplomaticness happens yields the clip-clop.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the criticizing half-holiday does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the metastableness does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the criticizing half-holiday does not occur and the metastableness does not occur.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the funambulism does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the extragalacticness does not occur.; sent5 & sent11 -> int4: the finalizing hemoprotein happens and the extragalacticness happens.; int4 -> int5: the extragalacticness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the criticizing half-holiday happens.; sent12 & sent21 & sent19 -> int8: the clip-clop occurs.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the criticizing half-holiday happens and the clip-clop occurs.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the non-metastableness causes that the criticizing half-holiday and the clip-clop occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the sliding happens. sent2: the finalizing encyclical does not occur. sent3: the extragalacticness does not occur if the funambulism does not occur. sent4: either the capableness or the seaquake or both happens. sent5: if the upholding hot-rod does not occur that the finalizing hemoprotein happens and the extragalacticness happens is not incorrect. sent6: the carangidness does not occur. sent7: if the upholding hot-rod does not occur then the finalizing hemoprotein happens. sent8: the buckling happens if the rewarding does not occur. sent9: the finalizing Tinca does not occur. sent10: the craning porosity prevents that the unconquerableness does not occur. sent11: the upholding hot-rod does not occur. sent12: either the diplomaticness or the criticizing baklava or both occurs. sent13: that the unenthusiasticness does not occur causes the non-calendricness. sent14: if that the pulsation does not occur and the modality happens is not incorrect then the finalizing Tinca does not occur. sent15: if the yips does not occur but the pretense occurs the fact that the lidlessness does not occur is not false. sent16: that that the funambulism does not occur is triggered by that the criticizing half-holiday does not occur and the metastableness does not occur is not incorrect. sent17: the lingual does not occur. sent18: the argillaceousness does not occur. sent19: if the criticizing baklava occurs the clip-clop occurs. sent20: the episcopalness does not occur. sent21: that the diplomaticness happens yields the clip-clop. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the criticizing half-holiday does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the metastableness does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the criticizing half-holiday does not occur and the metastableness does not occur.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the funambulism does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the extragalacticness does not occur.; sent5 & sent11 -> int4: the finalizing hemoprotein happens and the extragalacticness happens.; int4 -> int5: the extragalacticness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the criticizing half-holiday happens.; sent12 & sent21 & sent19 -> int8: the clip-clop occurs.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the criticizing half-holiday happens and the clip-clop occurs.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__