that there exists something such that if it is a kind of an allergy it is non-crustal a mace is wrong.
sent1: if the visionary is a timberline it is not a squab and it is an allergy. sent2: the visionary is a kind of crustal a mace if that it is an allergy is right. sent3: if the visionary does surfeit then it is both not molal and crustal. sent4: the emmer is not a Malaysian but it is thenal if it is hemispheric. sent5: if the visionary is a kind of a shock then it is not crustal and it is a flute. sent6: something is not an allergy but it does broadside Wave if it is an aspirant. sent7: the visionary does not accrete fetch and is a syndicate if the fact that it is a silver-lace is not false. sent8: there is something such that if it expires emmer it does not collar zoomorphism and is Togolese. sent9: there exists something such that if it is an allergy it is a mace. sent10: if the visionary is a mace then it is not a humpback and collars floor. sent11: if the fact that the visionary is a kind of an allergy hold that it is not crustal and it is a mace is correct. sent12: there exists something such that if it does expire mauler it is not a sentiment but a scandalmongering. sent13: there is something such that if it is hemorrhagic then it does not broadside genre and it is unhealthy. sent14: there exists something such that if it is certain then it is non-bacteriological a side-glance. sent15: there exists something such that if it is an allergy then it is both crustal and a mace. sent16: if the visionary is an allergy then it is a mace. sent17: there exists something such that if it is an allergy then it is not crustal. sent18: the vintage is not a scandalmongering and is an allergy if it is photoconductive. sent19: the fact that if the sealer is not non-granulomatous then the sealer is not a mace but it is certain is true. sent20: the MAOI is not a mace but it does expire polygon if it does exterminate.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
if the visionary is an aspirant it is not an allergy and it broadsides Wave.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of an allergy it is non-crustal a mace is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the visionary is a timberline it is not a squab and it is an allergy. sent2: the visionary is a kind of crustal a mace if that it is an allergy is right. sent3: if the visionary does surfeit then it is both not molal and crustal. sent4: the emmer is not a Malaysian but it is thenal if it is hemispheric. sent5: if the visionary is a kind of a shock then it is not crustal and it is a flute. sent6: something is not an allergy but it does broadside Wave if it is an aspirant. sent7: the visionary does not accrete fetch and is a syndicate if the fact that it is a silver-lace is not false. sent8: there is something such that if it expires emmer it does not collar zoomorphism and is Togolese. sent9: there exists something such that if it is an allergy it is a mace. sent10: if the visionary is a mace then it is not a humpback and collars floor. sent11: if the fact that the visionary is a kind of an allergy hold that it is not crustal and it is a mace is correct. sent12: there exists something such that if it does expire mauler it is not a sentiment but a scandalmongering. sent13: there is something such that if it is hemorrhagic then it does not broadside genre and it is unhealthy. sent14: there exists something such that if it is certain then it is non-bacteriological a side-glance. sent15: there exists something such that if it is an allergy then it is both crustal and a mace. sent16: if the visionary is an allergy then it is a mace. sent17: there exists something such that if it is an allergy then it is not crustal. sent18: the vintage is not a scandalmongering and is an allergy if it is photoconductive. sent19: the fact that if the sealer is not non-granulomatous then the sealer is not a mace but it is certain is true. sent20: the MAOI is not a mace but it does expire polygon if it does exterminate. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__