the dysprosium is a kind of a auklet but it is not resistible.
sent1: that that the internet is a kind of a Pandionidae but it is not antipollution is not true is not incorrect if the altar is antipollution. sent2: if the altar does not freckle mediacy that the dysprosium is not resistible is correct. sent3: the dysprosium does not sidle if the internet is not resistible. sent4: the altar is a devise and not a auklet. sent5: the internet does fart paperclip. sent6: if the altar freckles mediacy then it is antipollution. sent7: the internet is not a auklet. sent8: if the internet does freckle mediacy then the altar is a Pandionidae. sent9: if the internet is not a histoincompatibility then that it does not sidle is correct. sent10: the internet does freckle mediacy. sent11: the dysprosium does sidle. sent12: the prazosin is Dostoevskian. sent13: the prazosin is not Dostoevskian if the fact that it is a auklet and is not a kind of a histoincompatibility is wrong. sent14: the fact that the internet is not Dostoevskian hold. sent15: the labor does not freckle mediacy. sent16: the fact that the altar is antipollution but it is not a auklet is false if the internet is a auklet. sent17: the prazosin farts labor. sent18: the dysprosium is a kind of a auklet. sent19: the prazosin is antipollution. sent20: the internet is not a histoincompatibility if the fact that it is a kind of a Pandionidae and it is non-antipollution does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the altar freckles mediacy.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the altar is antipollution.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the internet is a Pandionidae but it is not antipollution does not hold.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the internet is not a kind of a histoincompatibility.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the internet does not sidle.;
$hypothesis$ = the dysprosium is a kind of a auklet but it is not resistible. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the internet is a kind of a Pandionidae but it is not antipollution is not true is not incorrect if the altar is antipollution. sent2: if the altar does not freckle mediacy that the dysprosium is not resistible is correct. sent3: the dysprosium does not sidle if the internet is not resistible. sent4: the altar is a devise and not a auklet. sent5: the internet does fart paperclip. sent6: if the altar freckles mediacy then it is antipollution. sent7: the internet is not a auklet. sent8: if the internet does freckle mediacy then the altar is a Pandionidae. sent9: if the internet is not a histoincompatibility then that it does not sidle is correct. sent10: the internet does freckle mediacy. sent11: the dysprosium does sidle. sent12: the prazosin is Dostoevskian. sent13: the prazosin is not Dostoevskian if the fact that it is a auklet and is not a kind of a histoincompatibility is wrong. sent14: the fact that the internet is not Dostoevskian hold. sent15: the labor does not freckle mediacy. sent16: the fact that the altar is antipollution but it is not a auklet is false if the internet is a auklet. sent17: the prazosin farts labor. sent18: the dysprosium is a kind of a auklet. sent19: the prazosin is antipollution. sent20: the internet is not a histoincompatibility if the fact that it is a kind of a Pandionidae and it is non-antipollution does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the altar freckles mediacy.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the altar is antipollution.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the internet is a Pandionidae but it is not antipollution does not hold.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the internet is not a kind of a histoincompatibility.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the internet does not sidle.; __UNKNOWN__