the perry is acyclic.
sent1: if the crucible is eremitic the rhodolite does not concoct and is not a Psithyrus. sent2: if that the fact that the brioche is acyclic and is not a kind of a feeding is not true is right then that it is Laotian is right. sent3: if the rhodolite concocts and is not a kind of a Psithyrus then the sowbread is not carnivorous. sent4: the fact that the perry is Laotian but it is not a feeding is not true if the brioche is Laotian. sent5: the crucible is wiry. sent6: the rhodolite does not concoct if the crucible is eremitic. sent7: if the fact that something is Laotian and is not a feeding is not right then it is acyclic. sent8: if the sowbread does hook plug the brioche is Laotian. sent9: the crucible is eremitic and it is wiry. sent10: if the fact that something is eremitic thing that is not Laotian is not correct then it is a Psithyrus. sent11: a non-carnivorous thing is a stowaway. sent12: if the rhodolite does not concoct and it is not a kind of a Psithyrus the sowbread is not carnivorous. sent13: that the pyromorphite is aground but it does not concoct is incorrect. sent14: something is acyclic if it is not Laotian. sent15: the perry is acyclic if it is not Laotian. sent16: the rhodolite does not concoct. sent17: if something is a stowaway then it does hook plug. sent18: if something is not eremitic then it is acyclic.
sent9 -> int1: the crucible is not non-eremitic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the rhodolite does not concoct and it is not a Psithyrus is correct.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the sowbread is not carnivorous.; sent11 -> int4: the sowbread is a kind of a stowaway if it is not carnivorous.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sowbread is a kind of a stowaway.; sent17 -> int6: if the sowbread is a kind of a stowaway then it does hook plug.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the sowbread hooks plug is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the brioche is Laotian.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the fact that the perry is Laotian but not a feeding is not right.; sent7 -> int10: if that the perry is Laotian but it is not a feeding does not hold then it is acyclic.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the perry is acyclic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the crucible is eremitic the rhodolite does not concoct and is not a Psithyrus. sent2: if that the fact that the brioche is acyclic and is not a kind of a feeding is not true is right then that it is Laotian is right. sent3: if the rhodolite concocts and is not a kind of a Psithyrus then the sowbread is not carnivorous. sent4: the fact that the perry is Laotian but it is not a feeding is not true if the brioche is Laotian. sent5: the crucible is wiry. sent6: the rhodolite does not concoct if the crucible is eremitic. sent7: if the fact that something is Laotian and is not a feeding is not right then it is acyclic. sent8: if the sowbread does hook plug the brioche is Laotian. sent9: the crucible is eremitic and it is wiry. sent10: if the fact that something is eremitic thing that is not Laotian is not correct then it is a Psithyrus. sent11: a non-carnivorous thing is a stowaway. sent12: if the rhodolite does not concoct and it is not a kind of a Psithyrus the sowbread is not carnivorous. sent13: that the pyromorphite is aground but it does not concoct is incorrect. sent14: something is acyclic if it is not Laotian. sent15: the perry is acyclic if it is not Laotian. sent16: the rhodolite does not concoct. sent17: if something is a stowaway then it does hook plug. sent18: if something is not eremitic then it is acyclic. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the crucible is not non-eremitic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the rhodolite does not concoct and it is not a Psithyrus is correct.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the sowbread is not carnivorous.; sent11 -> int4: the sowbread is a kind of a stowaway if it is not carnivorous.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sowbread is a kind of a stowaway.; sent17 -> int6: if the sowbread is a kind of a stowaway then it does hook plug.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the sowbread hooks plug is correct.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the brioche is Laotian.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the fact that the perry is Laotian but not a feeding is not right.; sent7 -> int10: if that the perry is Laotian but it is not a feeding does not hold then it is acyclic.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__