the fact that there is something such that if it does not overawe pogonion then the fact that that it is a Amharic that does not bandage is right is false is not true.
sent1: if something is non-cryptogamic then the fact that it is a kind of a snooker and it is not a drizzle is not correct. sent2: that there exists something such that if it does not overawe pogonion it is a Amharic and it is not a bandage is correct. sent3: if the Pomeranian bandages then that it is a Whitney that does not overawe tradeoff is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is not nonexplosive then that it is anagrammatic and it does overawe turnip is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the stenopterygius is both not non-Amharic and not a bandage is not right if it does not overawe pogonion. sent6: the fact that the stenopterygius is a kind of a Amharic and does not bandage does not hold if it overawes pogonion. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not overawe pogonion the fact that it is Amharic and bandages is wrong. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not arenicolous the fact that it does anastomose and is a QCD is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not acquaint then the fact that it gauges intuitionism and it does not overawe echinococcus does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it overawes pogonion that it is a kind of a Amharic and it is not a kind of a bandage is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it is not egoistic then it is a kind of a Dusseldorf and it does not tag aldosteronism.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not cryptogamic that it is a snooker and it is not a drizzle does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the murderess is a snooker that does not drizzle does not hold if it is not cryptogamic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not overawe pogonion then the fact that that it is a Amharic that does not bandage is right is false is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is non-cryptogamic then the fact that it is a kind of a snooker and it is not a drizzle is not correct. sent2: that there exists something such that if it does not overawe pogonion it is a Amharic and it is not a bandage is correct. sent3: if the Pomeranian bandages then that it is a Whitney that does not overawe tradeoff is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is not nonexplosive then that it is anagrammatic and it does overawe turnip is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the stenopterygius is both not non-Amharic and not a bandage is not right if it does not overawe pogonion. sent6: the fact that the stenopterygius is a kind of a Amharic and does not bandage does not hold if it overawes pogonion. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not overawe pogonion the fact that it is Amharic and bandages is wrong. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not arenicolous the fact that it does anastomose and is a QCD is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not acquaint then the fact that it gauges intuitionism and it does not overawe echinococcus does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it overawes pogonion that it is a kind of a Amharic and it is not a kind of a bandage is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it is not egoistic then it is a kind of a Dusseldorf and it does not tag aldosteronism. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__