the characterization occurs.
sent1: the fact that the algometry happens but the shedding does not occur is wrong if the bestrewing Norma happens. sent2: the fact that the nourishing occurs is correct. sent3: the heating happens if the affirmativeness does not occur and the encrimsoning contraction does not occur. sent4: the encrimsoning mirror does not occur. sent5: that the prefiguring does not occur and the encrimsoning declamation does not occur does not hold if the heat happens. sent6: if the enfranchisement happens then the bestrewing Norma does not occur and the characterization does not occur. sent7: that the brooming Gloucestershire does not occur is true if the bestrewing Norma does not occur and/or the enfranchisement occurs. sent8: if the googling does not occur then the basidialness happens. sent9: the burglary does not occur if the fact that the prefiguring does not occur and the encrimsoning declamation does not occur does not hold. sent10: that the algometry happens but the shedding does not occur is brought about by the nourishing. sent11: the uninstructiveness and/or the non-minusculeness occurs if the glyptography happens. sent12: if the basidialness occurs and the googling occurs then the perineotomy does not occur. sent13: both the glyptography and the offsideness happens if the burglary does not occur. sent14: if the Leibnizianness does not occur then the nourishing does not occur or the recumbing occurs or both. sent15: the googling does not occur if the brooming Gloucestershire does not occur or the perineotomy occurs or both. sent16: if the encrimsoning mirror does not occur then the affirmativeness does not occur and the encrimsoning contraction does not occur. sent17: that the nourishing does not occur hold if the nourishing does not occur and/or the recumbing occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bestrewing Norma occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the algometry but not the shedding happens does not hold.; sent10 & sent2 -> int2: the algometry but not the shedding happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the bestrewing Norma does not occur is correct.; int4 -> int5: either the bestrewing Norma does not occur or the enfranchisement happens or both.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the brooming Gloucestershire does not occur.; int6 -> int7: either the brooming Gloucestershire does not occur or the perineotomy occurs or both.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the fact that the googling does not occur is right.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the basidialness occurs.;
the characterization does not occur.
sent16 & sent4 -> int10: the affirmative does not occur and the encrimsoning contraction does not occur.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the heat happens.; sent5 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the prefiguring does not occur and the encrimsoning declamation does not occur does not hold.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: the burglary does not occur.; sent13 & int13 -> int14: both the glyptography and the offsideness occurs.; int14 -> int15: the glyptography happens.; sent11 & int15 -> int16: the instructiveness does not occur and/or the minuscule does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the characterization occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the algometry happens but the shedding does not occur is wrong if the bestrewing Norma happens. sent2: the fact that the nourishing occurs is correct. sent3: the heating happens if the affirmativeness does not occur and the encrimsoning contraction does not occur. sent4: the encrimsoning mirror does not occur. sent5: that the prefiguring does not occur and the encrimsoning declamation does not occur does not hold if the heat happens. sent6: if the enfranchisement happens then the bestrewing Norma does not occur and the characterization does not occur. sent7: that the brooming Gloucestershire does not occur is true if the bestrewing Norma does not occur and/or the enfranchisement occurs. sent8: if the googling does not occur then the basidialness happens. sent9: the burglary does not occur if the fact that the prefiguring does not occur and the encrimsoning declamation does not occur does not hold. sent10: that the algometry happens but the shedding does not occur is brought about by the nourishing. sent11: the uninstructiveness and/or the non-minusculeness occurs if the glyptography happens. sent12: if the basidialness occurs and the googling occurs then the perineotomy does not occur. sent13: both the glyptography and the offsideness happens if the burglary does not occur. sent14: if the Leibnizianness does not occur then the nourishing does not occur or the recumbing occurs or both. sent15: the googling does not occur if the brooming Gloucestershire does not occur or the perineotomy occurs or both. sent16: if the encrimsoning mirror does not occur then the affirmativeness does not occur and the encrimsoning contraction does not occur. sent17: that the nourishing does not occur hold if the nourishing does not occur and/or the recumbing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bestrewing Norma occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the algometry but not the shedding happens does not hold.; sent10 & sent2 -> int2: the algometry but not the shedding happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the bestrewing Norma does not occur is correct.; int4 -> int5: either the bestrewing Norma does not occur or the enfranchisement happens or both.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the brooming Gloucestershire does not occur.; int6 -> int7: either the brooming Gloucestershire does not occur or the perineotomy occurs or both.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the fact that the googling does not occur is right.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the basidialness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__