the myoglobin is not a camcorder but a luff.
sent1: if something is a Tribonema but it does not pit Aga it is not a well. sent2: the beading pits acerbity if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of ropey thing that does not gall naturopathy is incorrect. sent3: that the herm is a hull but it is not a stacks does not hold. sent4: that something is a luff but not dyslexic does not hold if it does not pit acerbity. sent5: that the interlock is dyslexic but it does not whisk is not right. sent6: if the beading does pit acerbity that the interlock is a kind of non-dyslexic thing that does not whisk is wrong. sent7: if something is a kind of ropey thing that does not gall naturopathy then that it is not a stacks is not false. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a whisk then the fact that the interlock does not pit acerbity is correct. sent9: the interlock is not dyslexic. sent10: the browallia does not whisk if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a hull that is not a stacks is not false does not hold. sent11: everything is not dyslexic. sent12: the myoglobin is not a camcorder and is a luff if it is not sacrificial. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is a luff but not dyslexic is not correct then the beading is not a luff. sent14: if the gibbon does not stack that the browallia is both a hull and not a stack does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the browallia is a hull that does not stack is not true then the myoglobin is not sacrificial. sent16: the myoglobin is not a camcorder. sent17: the gibbon does not gall naturopathy. sent18: that something is ropey but it does not gall naturopathy is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gibbon is ropey and does not gall naturopathy is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that that it is a kind of ropey thing that does not gall naturopathy is true is wrong.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the beading does pit acerbity.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the interlock is non-dyslexic and it is not a whisk is not right.; sent7 -> int4: if the gibbon is ropey thing that does not gall naturopathy then it is not a kind of a stacks.;
if the gat is a Tribonema but it does not pit Aga it is not a kind of a well.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the myoglobin is not a camcorder but a luff. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Tribonema but it does not pit Aga it is not a well. sent2: the beading pits acerbity if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of ropey thing that does not gall naturopathy is incorrect. sent3: that the herm is a hull but it is not a stacks does not hold. sent4: that something is a luff but not dyslexic does not hold if it does not pit acerbity. sent5: that the interlock is dyslexic but it does not whisk is not right. sent6: if the beading does pit acerbity that the interlock is a kind of non-dyslexic thing that does not whisk is wrong. sent7: if something is a kind of ropey thing that does not gall naturopathy then that it is not a stacks is not false. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a whisk then the fact that the interlock does not pit acerbity is correct. sent9: the interlock is not dyslexic. sent10: the browallia does not whisk if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a hull that is not a stacks is not false does not hold. sent11: everything is not dyslexic. sent12: the myoglobin is not a camcorder and is a luff if it is not sacrificial. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is a luff but not dyslexic is not correct then the beading is not a luff. sent14: if the gibbon does not stack that the browallia is both a hull and not a stack does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the browallia is a hull that does not stack is not true then the myoglobin is not sacrificial. sent16: the myoglobin is not a camcorder. sent17: the gibbon does not gall naturopathy. sent18: that something is ropey but it does not gall naturopathy is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gibbon is ropey and does not gall naturopathy is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that that it is a kind of ropey thing that does not gall naturopathy is true is wrong.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the beading does pit acerbity.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the interlock is non-dyslexic and it is not a whisk is not right.; sent7 -> int4: if the gibbon is ropey thing that does not gall naturopathy then it is not a kind of a stacks.; __UNKNOWN__