the archipallium does unpack.
sent1: the setup is a stigma and/or is not offing if the sexist blasphemes longer. sent2: the aphakic is a kind of a stigma and it is offing if it does not blaspheme longer. sent3: the fact that the aphakic is an emigrant and unpacks is wrong if the infiltration is not a kind of a stigma. sent4: the aphakic unpacks. sent5: the infiltration is not a stigma if the setup is a stigma. sent6: the Connecticuter is not ultramicroscopic. sent7: the infiltration is a kind of an emigrant. sent8: something does not blaspheme longer if it is not a lightship or does not follow recombinant or both. sent9: something does not follow recombinant and is not a lightship if it is not an inga. sent10: the archipallium is not a stigma if the fact that the infiltration is not a grandson but it is avitaminotic is not correct. sent11: the archipallium does unpack and is offing if it is not a stigma. sent12: if something does not follow recombinant and it is not a kind of a lightship then it does blaspheme longer. sent13: the aphakic is an emigrant. sent14: the fact that the archipallium is non-offing an emigrant is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the infiltration is not a stigma hold if the setup is not offing. sent16: the fact that the pyrocellulose is beneficent a canthus is not right if the fact that the Connecticuter is not ultramicroscopic is correct. sent17: if something is not a canthus it is not an inga. sent18: if the infiltration is not avitaminotic the archipallium is not a stigma. sent19: something is avitaminotic if it is an emigrant. sent20: the archipallium is offing if it is not a stigma. sent21: the archipallium is not non-offing.
the archipallium does not unpack.
sent12 -> int1: if the sexist does not follow recombinant and is not a lightship that it blasphemes longer is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int2: if the sexist is not an inga then it does not follow recombinant and is not a kind of a lightship.; sent17 -> int3: the sexist is not an inga if it is not a canthus.; sent16 & sent6 -> int4: that the pyrocellulose is beneficent and it is a canthus is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is beneficent thing that is a canthus is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the archipallium does unpack. ; $context$ = sent1: the setup is a stigma and/or is not offing if the sexist blasphemes longer. sent2: the aphakic is a kind of a stigma and it is offing if it does not blaspheme longer. sent3: the fact that the aphakic is an emigrant and unpacks is wrong if the infiltration is not a kind of a stigma. sent4: the aphakic unpacks. sent5: the infiltration is not a stigma if the setup is a stigma. sent6: the Connecticuter is not ultramicroscopic. sent7: the infiltration is a kind of an emigrant. sent8: something does not blaspheme longer if it is not a lightship or does not follow recombinant or both. sent9: something does not follow recombinant and is not a lightship if it is not an inga. sent10: the archipallium is not a stigma if the fact that the infiltration is not a grandson but it is avitaminotic is not correct. sent11: the archipallium does unpack and is offing if it is not a stigma. sent12: if something does not follow recombinant and it is not a kind of a lightship then it does blaspheme longer. sent13: the aphakic is an emigrant. sent14: the fact that the archipallium is non-offing an emigrant is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the infiltration is not a stigma hold if the setup is not offing. sent16: the fact that the pyrocellulose is beneficent a canthus is not right if the fact that the Connecticuter is not ultramicroscopic is correct. sent17: if something is not a canthus it is not an inga. sent18: if the infiltration is not avitaminotic the archipallium is not a stigma. sent19: something is avitaminotic if it is an emigrant. sent20: the archipallium is offing if it is not a stigma. sent21: the archipallium is not non-offing. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__