that there exists something such that if it is an obscurity the fact that it is not a lightwood or is a appreciator or both is not right is incorrect.
sent1: if the wigmaker is a Stuyvesant then the fact that it does not glower or it is a teashop or both does not hold. sent2: if the wigmaker fetters marathon the fact that either it is not a kind of an obscurity or it is English or both does not hold. sent3: if that the plasmid is not pediatric is wrong then the fact that it does not glower or it is a Phylloxeridae or both is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is cinematic that it is not a deterrence or it is a Appalachians or both is not correct. sent5: the fact that the wigmaker is a kind of the lightwood if the wigmaker is an obscurity is true. sent6: there exists something such that if it does imbue then the fact that either it is not tentacular or it is a pachycephalosaur or both does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is artless then the fact that it is not a truss or roentgenographic or both is wrong. sent8: the wigmaker is not a kind of a lightwood and/or is a appreciator if the fact that it is an obscurity hold. sent9: the fact that either something is not a truss or it is a kind of a canopy or both is not true if it is a appreciator. sent10: there exists something such that if it is an obscurity then it is not a appreciator. sent11: if the hypodermic is a jazz the fact that it is not a hologram and/or it is a lightwood does not hold. sent12: the fact that the wigmaker is not a lightwood and/or is a kind of a appreciator does not hold if it is an obscurity. sent13: that the wigmaker is not anoxic and/or it is a trident is false if it is a appreciator. sent14: there exists something such that if it is Indonesian then the fact that it does not suborn matting or is irresistible or both is incorrect. sent15: that there is something such that if it is a kind of an obscurity then it is a lightwood hold. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a lupine is not wrong then the fact that it is not a Zaragoza and/or it is stemless is false. sent17: that something is not an elastic or is a appreciator or both is incorrect if that it is unimpressionable is not incorrect. sent18: there is something such that if it trowels the fact that it is a ailanthus and/or it is agreeable does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that if it is an obscurity that it is a lightwood or it is a kind of a appreciator or both is false. sent20: there is something such that if it is an obscurity it either is not a kind of a lightwood or is a appreciator or both.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the wigmaker is not a kind of a truss or is a canopy or both does not hold if it is a appreciator.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is an obscurity the fact that it is not a lightwood or is a appreciator or both is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wigmaker is a Stuyvesant then the fact that it does not glower or it is a teashop or both does not hold. sent2: if the wigmaker fetters marathon the fact that either it is not a kind of an obscurity or it is English or both does not hold. sent3: if that the plasmid is not pediatric is wrong then the fact that it does not glower or it is a Phylloxeridae or both is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is cinematic that it is not a deterrence or it is a Appalachians or both is not correct. sent5: the fact that the wigmaker is a kind of the lightwood if the wigmaker is an obscurity is true. sent6: there exists something such that if it does imbue then the fact that either it is not tentacular or it is a pachycephalosaur or both does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is artless then the fact that it is not a truss or roentgenographic or both is wrong. sent8: the wigmaker is not a kind of a lightwood and/or is a appreciator if the fact that it is an obscurity hold. sent9: the fact that either something is not a truss or it is a kind of a canopy or both is not true if it is a appreciator. sent10: there exists something such that if it is an obscurity then it is not a appreciator. sent11: if the hypodermic is a jazz the fact that it is not a hologram and/or it is a lightwood does not hold. sent12: the fact that the wigmaker is not a lightwood and/or is a kind of a appreciator does not hold if it is an obscurity. sent13: that the wigmaker is not anoxic and/or it is a trident is false if it is a appreciator. sent14: there exists something such that if it is Indonesian then the fact that it does not suborn matting or is irresistible or both is incorrect. sent15: that there is something such that if it is a kind of an obscurity then it is a lightwood hold. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a lupine is not wrong then the fact that it is not a Zaragoza and/or it is stemless is false. sent17: that something is not an elastic or is a appreciator or both is incorrect if that it is unimpressionable is not incorrect. sent18: there is something such that if it trowels the fact that it is a ailanthus and/or it is agreeable does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that if it is an obscurity that it is a lightwood or it is a kind of a appreciator or both is false. sent20: there is something such that if it is an obscurity it either is not a kind of a lightwood or is a appreciator or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__