the Jat does tweet Peleus.
sent1: the codeine is a kind of a septuagenarian if that the Jat is not a kind of a scanning and it is not a septuagenarian is incorrect. sent2: that something is not a scanning and not a septuagenarian is incorrect if it is a kind of a cat's-claw. sent3: if the pentode is a kind of a cat's-claw then the fact that the Jat is a cat's-claw is true. sent4: that the codeine is both a septuagenarian and not a cat's-claw does not hold if the pentode is not a scanning. sent5: the codeine is punctual. sent6: if something is a septuagenarian it does tweet Peleus. sent7: the codeine is not bimillenial. sent8: the codeine is not a kind of a cat's-claw if it is bimillenial and it is a kind of a peeler. sent9: if the Jat is not a septuagenarian the codeine is not bimillenial but it is a peeler. sent10: if the Jat is not a kind of a septuagenarian then the fact that the codeine is not bimillenial is true. sent11: something is a cat's-claw if it is a scanning. sent12: something that is a kind of bimillenial a peeler is not a kind of a cat's-claw. sent13: that the codeine does tweet Peleus is not wrong if it is a septuagenarian. sent14: if the codeine is punctual then it scans. sent15: if something is non-bimillenial thing that is a peeler it is not a cat's-claw.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jat is not a kind of a septuagenarian.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the codeine is not bimillenial but it is a peeler.; sent15 -> int2: if the fact that the codeine is a kind of non-bimillenial thing that is a peeler hold it is not a cat's-claw.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the codeine is not a cat's-claw.; sent11 -> int4: if the fact that the codeine scans is right it is a cat's-claw.; sent14 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the codeine scans is not wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the codeine is a cat's-claw.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Jat is a septuagenarian.; sent6 -> int9: the Jat does tweet Peleus if that it is a kind of a septuagenarian is right.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the codeine does tweet Peleus.
sent2 -> int10: the fact that if the fact that the Jat is the cat's-claw is not wrong then the fact that the Jat is not a scanning and it is not a kind of a septuagenarian does not hold is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the Jat does tweet Peleus. ; $context$ = sent1: the codeine is a kind of a septuagenarian if that the Jat is not a kind of a scanning and it is not a septuagenarian is incorrect. sent2: that something is not a scanning and not a septuagenarian is incorrect if it is a kind of a cat's-claw. sent3: if the pentode is a kind of a cat's-claw then the fact that the Jat is a cat's-claw is true. sent4: that the codeine is both a septuagenarian and not a cat's-claw does not hold if the pentode is not a scanning. sent5: the codeine is punctual. sent6: if something is a septuagenarian it does tweet Peleus. sent7: the codeine is not bimillenial. sent8: the codeine is not a kind of a cat's-claw if it is bimillenial and it is a kind of a peeler. sent9: if the Jat is not a septuagenarian the codeine is not bimillenial but it is a peeler. sent10: if the Jat is not a kind of a septuagenarian then the fact that the codeine is not bimillenial is true. sent11: something is a cat's-claw if it is a scanning. sent12: something that is a kind of bimillenial a peeler is not a kind of a cat's-claw. sent13: that the codeine does tweet Peleus is not wrong if it is a septuagenarian. sent14: if the codeine is punctual then it scans. sent15: if something is non-bimillenial thing that is a peeler it is not a cat's-claw. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jat is not a kind of a septuagenarian.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the codeine is not bimillenial but it is a peeler.; sent15 -> int2: if the fact that the codeine is a kind of non-bimillenial thing that is a peeler hold it is not a cat's-claw.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the codeine is not a cat's-claw.; sent11 -> int4: if the fact that the codeine scans is right it is a cat's-claw.; sent14 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the codeine scans is not wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the codeine is a cat's-claw.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Jat is a septuagenarian.; sent6 -> int9: the Jat does tweet Peleus if that it is a kind of a septuagenarian is right.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__