the ricing burning occurs.
sent1: the ricing burning does not occur if that the snagging obstipation occurs is correct. sent2: the laxness happens. sent3: the passive but not the sexism occurs. sent4: if the fact that the snagging flattop does not occur is wrong the snagging obstipation happens. sent5: the fact that the on-lineness and the non-bentoniticness happens is not true if the charming obstipation does not occur. sent6: if the apologeticsness happens then the snagging flattop happens and the touching does not occur. sent7: that the sexism happens and the affirmation occurs is caused by the non-apologeticsness. sent8: if the charming cosine happens then the passive occurs. sent9: if the fact that the on-lineness but not the bentoniticness happens is not right then the charming cosine occurs. sent10: the affirmation happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the apologeticsness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: both the sexism and the affirmation happens.; int1 -> int2: the sexism happens.; sent3 -> int3: the sexism does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the apologeticsness occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the snagging flattop but not the touch occurs.; int6 -> int7: the snagging flattop occurs.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the snagging obstipation occurs.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the ricing burning occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the ricing burning occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the ricing burning does not occur if that the snagging obstipation occurs is correct. sent2: the laxness happens. sent3: the passive but not the sexism occurs. sent4: if the fact that the snagging flattop does not occur is wrong the snagging obstipation happens. sent5: the fact that the on-lineness and the non-bentoniticness happens is not true if the charming obstipation does not occur. sent6: if the apologeticsness happens then the snagging flattop happens and the touching does not occur. sent7: that the sexism happens and the affirmation occurs is caused by the non-apologeticsness. sent8: if the charming cosine happens then the passive occurs. sent9: if the fact that the on-lineness but not the bentoniticness happens is not right then the charming cosine occurs. sent10: the affirmation happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the apologeticsness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: both the sexism and the affirmation happens.; int1 -> int2: the sexism happens.; sent3 -> int3: the sexism does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the apologeticsness occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the snagging flattop but not the touch occurs.; int6 -> int7: the snagging flattop occurs.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the snagging obstipation occurs.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__