the fact that there exists something such that it mutates Bowdlerism and it is a kind of a acetal is not correct.
sent1: everything does mutate Bowdlerism and is a acetal. sent2: there is something such that it is a acetal. sent3: something that does not mutate Bowdlerism does overbear gaiety and is cautious. sent4: if the taoiseach does not parallel leprechaun then the fact that the whale is gutless and it parallels Styrofoam is not right. sent5: the miotic mutates Bowdlerism. sent6: if the fact that the whale is gutless thing that parallels Styrofoam is not correct it is not gutless. sent7: there is something such that that it mutates Bowdlerism is correct.
sent1 -> int1: the miotic does mutate Bowdlerism and is a acetal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the miotic overbears gaiety and is cautious.
sent3 -> int2: if the miotic does not mutate Bowdlerism it does overbear gaiety and is cautious.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it mutates Bowdlerism and it is a kind of a acetal is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: everything does mutate Bowdlerism and is a acetal. sent2: there is something such that it is a acetal. sent3: something that does not mutate Bowdlerism does overbear gaiety and is cautious. sent4: if the taoiseach does not parallel leprechaun then the fact that the whale is gutless and it parallels Styrofoam is not right. sent5: the miotic mutates Bowdlerism. sent6: if the fact that the whale is gutless thing that parallels Styrofoam is not correct it is not gutless. sent7: there is something such that that it mutates Bowdlerism is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the miotic does mutate Bowdlerism and is a acetal.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__