that both the confession and the epicness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the sinking does not occur or the noncommercialness does not occur or both if the briefing happens. sent2: the apocrineness occurs if the humbug does not occur or the mismanaging bunt does not occur or both. sent3: if the impressionist does not occur both the confession and the baptism occurs. sent4: the fact that if the fact that the briefing does not occur is correct then the fact that that the confession and the epicness happens hold is not correct is correct. sent5: that the sinking does not occur and/or the noncommercialness does not occur prevents the non-epicness. sent6: that the briefing occurs and the Pacificness happens is not wrong. sent7: the fading occurs if the fact that the Pacific does not occur and the briefing does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the Pacific occurs. sent9: the icosahedralness happens if that that the radicalness does not occur and the mismanaging struggler happens is right is not correct. sent10: if that the noncommercialness does not occur is not wrong then the briefing does not occur and the Pacificness does not occur. sent11: the icosahedralness occurs. sent12: both the non-impressionistness and the icosahedralness occurs. sent13: both the non-noncommercialness and the sinking happens if the baptism does not occur. sent14: the fact that the fact that the Pacificness does not occur and the briefing does not occur is not incorrect does not hold if the epic does not occur.
sent6 -> int1: the briefing happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the sinking does not occur and/or the noncommercialness does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the epic occurs.; sent12 -> int4: the impressionist does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the confession and the baptism occurs hold.; int5 -> int6: the confession happens.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
both the fade and the archivalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that both the confession and the epicness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the sinking does not occur or the noncommercialness does not occur or both if the briefing happens. sent2: the apocrineness occurs if the humbug does not occur or the mismanaging bunt does not occur or both. sent3: if the impressionist does not occur both the confession and the baptism occurs. sent4: the fact that if the fact that the briefing does not occur is correct then the fact that that the confession and the epicness happens hold is not correct is correct. sent5: that the sinking does not occur and/or the noncommercialness does not occur prevents the non-epicness. sent6: that the briefing occurs and the Pacificness happens is not wrong. sent7: the fading occurs if the fact that the Pacific does not occur and the briefing does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the Pacific occurs. sent9: the icosahedralness happens if that that the radicalness does not occur and the mismanaging struggler happens is right is not correct. sent10: if that the noncommercialness does not occur is not wrong then the briefing does not occur and the Pacificness does not occur. sent11: the icosahedralness occurs. sent12: both the non-impressionistness and the icosahedralness occurs. sent13: both the non-noncommercialness and the sinking happens if the baptism does not occur. sent14: the fact that the fact that the Pacificness does not occur and the briefing does not occur is not incorrect does not hold if the epic does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the briefing happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the sinking does not occur and/or the noncommercialness does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the epic occurs.; sent12 -> int4: the impressionist does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the confession and the baptism occurs hold.; int5 -> int6: the confession happens.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__