that the masquerader does not strip cardoon and is not a Oncorhynchus does not hold.
sent1: the mishap is not a Xian if it is argumentative and does not book featherweight. sent2: there exists something such that it is a kind of a potpie and/or it votes. sent3: the Orthoptera is not a kind of a potpie if there is something such that it is a kind of a cape. sent4: if there is something such that it is a vote then the Orthoptera is a potpie. sent5: if there exists something such that it either is a potpie or votes or both the Orthoptera is a potpie. sent6: the fact that either the mishap is not a kind of a Icelandic or it is not a kind of a Xian or both does not hold. sent7: the tension is not a kind of an intelligence if it is not a Sydenham and shags. sent8: the tension is not a kind of a Sydenham but it does shag if the fothergilla is not a kind of a Sydenham. sent9: something that is both opaque and not a cape is not a kind of a Sydenham. sent10: the fact that the mishap does not frolic and it does not discriminate is false. sent11: the fothergilla is opaque if the fact that the mishap is not a Icelandic or it is not a Xian or both is incorrect. sent12: if the fact that the fothergilla is a Oncorhynchus and/or does not strip cardoon is wrong then the masquerader is a kind of a Sydenham. sent13: if the Orthoptera is not a potpie and/or is not opaque the masquerader is not a cape. sent14: the mishap is a Icelandic. sent15: that the masquerader strips cardoon but it is not a Oncorhynchus is wrong. sent16: if the tension is not an intelligence then the fact that the masquerader does not strip cardoon and it is not a kind of a Oncorhynchus does not hold. sent17: the tension is not a Sydenham and it is not opaque if the mishap is an intelligence.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fothergilla is a cape.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a cape.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Orthoptera is not a potpie.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the Orthoptera is a potpie.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fothergilla is not a cape.; sent11 & sent6 -> int6: the fothergilla is opaque.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fothergilla is opaque and is not a cape.; sent9 -> int8: if the fothergilla is opaque thing that is not a cape then it is not a kind of a Sydenham.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fothergilla is not a Sydenham.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the tension is not a kind of a Sydenham but it is a shagged.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the tension is not a kind of an intelligence.; int11 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the masquerader does not strip cardoon and is not a Oncorhynchus.
$hypothesis$ = that the masquerader does not strip cardoon and is not a Oncorhynchus does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the mishap is not a Xian if it is argumentative and does not book featherweight. sent2: there exists something such that it is a kind of a potpie and/or it votes. sent3: the Orthoptera is not a kind of a potpie if there is something such that it is a kind of a cape. sent4: if there is something such that it is a vote then the Orthoptera is a potpie. sent5: if there exists something such that it either is a potpie or votes or both the Orthoptera is a potpie. sent6: the fact that either the mishap is not a kind of a Icelandic or it is not a kind of a Xian or both does not hold. sent7: the tension is not a kind of an intelligence if it is not a Sydenham and shags. sent8: the tension is not a kind of a Sydenham but it does shag if the fothergilla is not a kind of a Sydenham. sent9: something that is both opaque and not a cape is not a kind of a Sydenham. sent10: the fact that the mishap does not frolic and it does not discriminate is false. sent11: the fothergilla is opaque if the fact that the mishap is not a Icelandic or it is not a Xian or both is incorrect. sent12: if the fact that the fothergilla is a Oncorhynchus and/or does not strip cardoon is wrong then the masquerader is a kind of a Sydenham. sent13: if the Orthoptera is not a potpie and/or is not opaque the masquerader is not a cape. sent14: the mishap is a Icelandic. sent15: that the masquerader strips cardoon but it is not a Oncorhynchus is wrong. sent16: if the tension is not an intelligence then the fact that the masquerader does not strip cardoon and it is not a kind of a Oncorhynchus does not hold. sent17: the tension is not a Sydenham and it is not opaque if the mishap is an intelligence. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fothergilla is a cape.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a cape.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Orthoptera is not a potpie.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the Orthoptera is a potpie.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fothergilla is not a cape.; sent11 & sent6 -> int6: the fothergilla is opaque.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fothergilla is opaque and is not a cape.; sent9 -> int8: if the fothergilla is opaque thing that is not a cape then it is not a kind of a Sydenham.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fothergilla is not a Sydenham.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the tension is not a kind of a Sydenham but it is a shagged.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the tension is not a kind of an intelligence.; int11 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__