the blinkering Temujin does not occur.
sent1: if the significantness occurs then the literalness occurs. sent2: both the significantness and the catalaticness occurs if the tattle does not occur. sent3: the burglarizing Sully occurs. sent4: if the bronze does not occur that the literalness happens and the significantness occurs is wrong. sent5: that the burglarizing Sully does not occur and the bronze does not occur does not hold if the fact that the literalness occurs hold. sent6: the catalaticness does not occur if the fact that the fact that the literalness occurs and the significantness happens is true is incorrect. sent7: if not the burglarizing Khmer but the employment occurs the blinkering evergreen does not occur. sent8: if the blinkering evergreen does not occur then the catalaticness happens and the tattle happens. sent9: if the blinkering Temujin and the burglarizing Sully happens then the bronze does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blinkering Temujin happens is correct.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the blinkering Temujin happens and the burglarizing Sully occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the bronzing does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the literalness and the significantness happens does not hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the catalaticness does not occur.;
the blinkering Temujin happens.
$hypothesis$ = the blinkering Temujin does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the significantness occurs then the literalness occurs. sent2: both the significantness and the catalaticness occurs if the tattle does not occur. sent3: the burglarizing Sully occurs. sent4: if the bronze does not occur that the literalness happens and the significantness occurs is wrong. sent5: that the burglarizing Sully does not occur and the bronze does not occur does not hold if the fact that the literalness occurs hold. sent6: the catalaticness does not occur if the fact that the fact that the literalness occurs and the significantness happens is true is incorrect. sent7: if not the burglarizing Khmer but the employment occurs the blinkering evergreen does not occur. sent8: if the blinkering evergreen does not occur then the catalaticness happens and the tattle happens. sent9: if the blinkering Temujin and the burglarizing Sully happens then the bronze does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blinkering Temujin happens is correct.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the blinkering Temujin happens and the burglarizing Sully occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the bronzing does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the literalness and the significantness happens does not hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the catalaticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__