that that the indurating does not occur is not incorrect if both the dramaticness and the resultant occurs is not true.
sent1: the detailing ritualist does not occur if the self-organization occurs and the premedicalness occurs. sent2: the indurating occurs. sent3: if the curatorialness happens the fact that the artifactualness happens hold. sent4: both the seamanlikeness and the indurating happens if the ramble does not occur. sent5: the rambling happens. sent6: that the capsuling hookup happens and the whoopee occurs results in the immeasurableness. sent7: if the rambling occurs then the seamanlikeness does not occur. sent8: the neighing occurs. sent9: the crime occurs. sent10: that the resultant happens leads to the detailing Marseille. sent11: the machine-madeness occurs and the clangoring Seth does not occur. sent12: if the detailing Marseille but not the seamanlikeness occurs the indurating does not occur. sent13: the dramaticness happens. sent14: the whoopee occurs. sent15: that the indurating happens is brought about by that both the detailing Marseille and the unseamanlikeness happens. sent16: if the resultant does not occur the detailing marlin happens and the dramaticness happens. sent17: the Semiticness happens and the detailing marlin happens. sent18: that both the dramaticness and the resultant happens triggers the indurating. sent19: that the irreverence occurs hold. sent20: the clangoring brevet does not occur. sent21: if the capsuling closet but not the offering happens then the Semitic does not occur. sent22: the tailback occurs but the unreadiness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dramaticness and the resultant happens.; assump1 -> int1: the resultant happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the detailing Marseille happens hold.; sent7 & sent5 -> int3: the seamanlikeness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the detailing Marseille and the non-seamanlikeness happens.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the indurating does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the detailing marlin happens.
$hypothesis$ = that that the indurating does not occur is not incorrect if both the dramaticness and the resultant occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the detailing ritualist does not occur if the self-organization occurs and the premedicalness occurs. sent2: the indurating occurs. sent3: if the curatorialness happens the fact that the artifactualness happens hold. sent4: both the seamanlikeness and the indurating happens if the ramble does not occur. sent5: the rambling happens. sent6: that the capsuling hookup happens and the whoopee occurs results in the immeasurableness. sent7: if the rambling occurs then the seamanlikeness does not occur. sent8: the neighing occurs. sent9: the crime occurs. sent10: that the resultant happens leads to the detailing Marseille. sent11: the machine-madeness occurs and the clangoring Seth does not occur. sent12: if the detailing Marseille but not the seamanlikeness occurs the indurating does not occur. sent13: the dramaticness happens. sent14: the whoopee occurs. sent15: that the indurating happens is brought about by that both the detailing Marseille and the unseamanlikeness happens. sent16: if the resultant does not occur the detailing marlin happens and the dramaticness happens. sent17: the Semiticness happens and the detailing marlin happens. sent18: that both the dramaticness and the resultant happens triggers the indurating. sent19: that the irreverence occurs hold. sent20: the clangoring brevet does not occur. sent21: if the capsuling closet but not the offering happens then the Semitic does not occur. sent22: the tailback occurs but the unreadiness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dramaticness and the resultant happens.; assump1 -> int1: the resultant happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the detailing Marseille happens hold.; sent7 & sent5 -> int3: the seamanlikeness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the detailing Marseille and the non-seamanlikeness happens.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the indurating does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__