the fact that the luminescing occurs is right.
sent1: if the campaigning occurs but the reductionistness does not occur then the luminescing does not occur. sent2: the fact that the secreting tambour but not the moonbeam happens is not right if that the reductionistness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the luminescing occurs is correct if the reductionistness happens. sent4: the fact that the campaigning does not occur hold if the fact that the secreting tambour but not the moonbeam occurs is not right. sent5: that the secreting tambour and the moonbeam occurs does not hold. sent6: if the centering does not occur the transcendentalness and the occupation occurs. sent7: if the occupation does not occur both the transcendentalness and the theater happens. sent8: if the fact that both the campaigning and the non-reductionistness happens is false the myeloidness occurs. sent9: that the theater occurs hold. sent10: if the translation does not occur then the non-centeringness and the juniorness happens. sent11: the theater is triggered by the non-transcendentalness. sent12: if the junior does not occur the occupation does not occur and the centering does not occur. sent13: the psychogenicness occurs. sent14: that the fact that the secreting tambour occurs and the moonbeam happens is not incorrect is wrong if the reductionistness does not occur. sent15: if the moonbeam occurs then the campaigning does not occur. sent16: both the campaigning and the theater occurs if the transcendentalness does not occur. sent17: the translation is prevented by that the solicitation and the bumping occurs. sent18: the solicitation happens. sent19: if the crumbling Blucher occurs the companying brodiaea occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the reductionistness does not occur is not wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the secreting tambour happens but the moonbeam does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the campaigning does not occur.;
the myeloidness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the luminescing occurs is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the campaigning occurs but the reductionistness does not occur then the luminescing does not occur. sent2: the fact that the secreting tambour but not the moonbeam happens is not right if that the reductionistness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the luminescing occurs is correct if the reductionistness happens. sent4: the fact that the campaigning does not occur hold if the fact that the secreting tambour but not the moonbeam occurs is not right. sent5: that the secreting tambour and the moonbeam occurs does not hold. sent6: if the centering does not occur the transcendentalness and the occupation occurs. sent7: if the occupation does not occur both the transcendentalness and the theater happens. sent8: if the fact that both the campaigning and the non-reductionistness happens is false the myeloidness occurs. sent9: that the theater occurs hold. sent10: if the translation does not occur then the non-centeringness and the juniorness happens. sent11: the theater is triggered by the non-transcendentalness. sent12: if the junior does not occur the occupation does not occur and the centering does not occur. sent13: the psychogenicness occurs. sent14: that the fact that the secreting tambour occurs and the moonbeam happens is not incorrect is wrong if the reductionistness does not occur. sent15: if the moonbeam occurs then the campaigning does not occur. sent16: both the campaigning and the theater occurs if the transcendentalness does not occur. sent17: the translation is prevented by that the solicitation and the bumping occurs. sent18: the solicitation happens. sent19: if the crumbling Blucher occurs the companying brodiaea occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the reductionistness does not occur is not wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the secreting tambour happens but the moonbeam does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the campaigning does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__