the wet-nurse does not bar Linnaeus.
sent1: the Mills is accessional. sent2: the Mills is a blastoderm and/or it bars Linnaeus if the chef does not bar freeze. sent3: the wet-nurse is not a Isuridae. sent4: if something bars freeze it is a kind of a ivorybill. sent5: if the Mills is a ivorybill and it is a Isuridae then the wet-nurse does not bar Linnaeus. sent6: the steward is both not a Isuridae and a ivorybill if the contact is not non-illegal. sent7: if the fact that either the Mills is not accessional or it does not fail ratline or both is incorrect then it is not a kind of a blastoderm. sent8: the Mills is a kind of a Isuridae if the fact that the chef is illegal and is not a Isuridae is wrong. sent9: that the Mills is not a blastoderm and it does not bar freeze does not hold. sent10: that the chef is illegal and is not a Isuridae does not hold if something is a kind of a Isuridae. sent11: the steward grits. sent12: if the chef is not illegal then the Mills is a Isuridae. sent13: if the contact is not bismuthic then it is illegal and grits. sent14: the fact that the Mills is not accessional and/or it does not fail ratline is wrong. sent15: if the chef is a ivorybill then the Mills is a ivorybill. sent16: that the Mills is not a blastoderm is not false if the fact that it is accessional or it does not fail ratline or both is incorrect. sent17: the ophryon bars Linnaeus. sent18: the fact that the steward is a Isuridae is correct if it is a grits.
sent7 & sent14 -> int1: the Mills is not a blastoderm.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Mills does not bar freeze is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Mills is not a blastoderm and it does not bar freeze.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Mills does bar freeze.; sent4 -> int5: if the fact that the Mills bars freeze is correct it is a ivorybill.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Mills is a kind of a ivorybill.; sent18 & sent11 -> int7: the steward is a Isuridae.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a Isuridae.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the fact that the chef is illegal and not a Isuridae is wrong.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the Mills is a Isuridae.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Mills is a ivorybill and a Isuridae.; int11 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the wet-nurse bars Linnaeus.
$hypothesis$ = the wet-nurse does not bar Linnaeus. ; $context$ = sent1: the Mills is accessional. sent2: the Mills is a blastoderm and/or it bars Linnaeus if the chef does not bar freeze. sent3: the wet-nurse is not a Isuridae. sent4: if something bars freeze it is a kind of a ivorybill. sent5: if the Mills is a ivorybill and it is a Isuridae then the wet-nurse does not bar Linnaeus. sent6: the steward is both not a Isuridae and a ivorybill if the contact is not non-illegal. sent7: if the fact that either the Mills is not accessional or it does not fail ratline or both is incorrect then it is not a kind of a blastoderm. sent8: the Mills is a kind of a Isuridae if the fact that the chef is illegal and is not a Isuridae is wrong. sent9: that the Mills is not a blastoderm and it does not bar freeze does not hold. sent10: that the chef is illegal and is not a Isuridae does not hold if something is a kind of a Isuridae. sent11: the steward grits. sent12: if the chef is not illegal then the Mills is a Isuridae. sent13: if the contact is not bismuthic then it is illegal and grits. sent14: the fact that the Mills is not accessional and/or it does not fail ratline is wrong. sent15: if the chef is a ivorybill then the Mills is a ivorybill. sent16: that the Mills is not a blastoderm is not false if the fact that it is accessional or it does not fail ratline or both is incorrect. sent17: the ophryon bars Linnaeus. sent18: the fact that the steward is a Isuridae is correct if it is a grits. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent14 -> int1: the Mills is not a blastoderm.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Mills does not bar freeze is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Mills is not a blastoderm and it does not bar freeze.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Mills does bar freeze.; sent4 -> int5: if the fact that the Mills bars freeze is correct it is a ivorybill.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Mills is a kind of a ivorybill.; sent18 & sent11 -> int7: the steward is a Isuridae.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a Isuridae.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the fact that the chef is illegal and not a Isuridae is wrong.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the Mills is a Isuridae.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Mills is a ivorybill and a Isuridae.; int11 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__