the lasagna is not a girlishness.
sent1: something is not a girlishness if that it is both not a hypsography and not a compere is not correct. sent2: the tapa appropriates if the lasagna is not a kind of a girlishness. sent3: that the tapa is either not appropriate or systolic or both does not hold if the lasagna is not a girlishness. sent4: if the restaurant is not a compulsiveness then the eggplant is a compere and it is a hypsography. sent5: if the restaurant is a kind of a Edam that does clear eggplant the fact that it is not a compulsiveness hold. sent6: the restaurant is a kind of a Edam and clears eggplant. sent7: if the tapa is not a girlishness the fact that the lasagna is not a kind of a neigh and/or it does stage staurikosaur is not correct. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not appropriate and/or it is systolic does not hold then the eggplant is not a compere. sent9: the fact that the restaurant is a kind of a Edam that does not clear eggplant is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lasagna is not a girlishness.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the tapa does not appropriate and/or it is systolic is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not appropriate or it is systolic or both does not hold.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the eggplant is not a compere.; sent5 & sent6 -> int4: the restaurant is not a compulsiveness.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the eggplant is both a compere and a hypsography.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the eggplant is a compere is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that that it does not neigh and/or it does stage staurikosaur is not right.
sent1 -> int8: the fact that if that the tapa is not a hypsography and it is not the compere does not hold then the tapa is not a girlishness is true.; sent9 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is a Edam and does not clear eggplant is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the lasagna is not a girlishness. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a girlishness if that it is both not a hypsography and not a compere is not correct. sent2: the tapa appropriates if the lasagna is not a kind of a girlishness. sent3: that the tapa is either not appropriate or systolic or both does not hold if the lasagna is not a girlishness. sent4: if the restaurant is not a compulsiveness then the eggplant is a compere and it is a hypsography. sent5: if the restaurant is a kind of a Edam that does clear eggplant the fact that it is not a compulsiveness hold. sent6: the restaurant is a kind of a Edam and clears eggplant. sent7: if the tapa is not a girlishness the fact that the lasagna is not a kind of a neigh and/or it does stage staurikosaur is not correct. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not appropriate and/or it is systolic does not hold then the eggplant is not a compere. sent9: the fact that the restaurant is a kind of a Edam that does not clear eggplant is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lasagna is not a girlishness.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the tapa does not appropriate and/or it is systolic is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not appropriate or it is systolic or both does not hold.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the eggplant is not a compere.; sent5 & sent6 -> int4: the restaurant is not a compulsiveness.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the eggplant is both a compere and a hypsography.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the eggplant is a compere is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__