the pitying ding happens.
sent1: if the cessation happens then not the polymericness but the know happens. sent2: that that the singling Firenze does not occur and the arrogance happens is not incorrect is triggered by that the chloroticness does not occur. sent3: if the swapping surcoat does not occur then the fact that the ringer and the hijack happens is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the non-polymericness and the knowing occurs does not hold. sent5: if the fact that the leash happens and/or the Dalmatianness happens is not right the cessation happens. sent6: if that the swapping surcoat happens but the subjunctive does not occur is incorrect that the swapping surcoat does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: that both the polymericness and the knowing happens does not hold. sent8: that the ringer does not occur and/or the nidicolousness does not occur is brought about by that the agency does not occur. sent9: the cessation occurs if the fact that that the leash occurs and/or the Dalmatian does not occur is not wrong is incorrect. sent10: if the agency occurs the Dalmatian happens. sent11: if the cessation occurs the polymericness does not occur. sent12: the polymericness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the chloroticness does not occur if that the chloroticness but not the convertibleness occurs is wrong is correct. sent14: that the nidicolousness does not occur triggers the pitying ding. sent15: if the cyprianness occurs then that the swapping surcoat and the non-subjunctiveness happens does not hold. sent16: the ringer does not occur if the fact that the ringer and the hijacking occurs does not hold. sent17: the fact that the Dalmatian occurs hold. sent18: the pitying ding is prevented by the non-nidicolousness. sent19: that the ringer does not occur causes that not the knowing but the nidicolousness occurs. sent20: the cyprianness occurs if not the singling Firenze but the arrogance occurs. sent21: that either the leash happens or the Dalmatian does not occur or both is not true if the agency happens. sent22: that the pitying ding does not occur is triggered by that the ringer does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agency occurs.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the leash and/or the non-Dalmatianness occurs is not right.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the cessation occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: not the polymericness but the know occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the agency does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the ringer does not occur and/or the nidicolousness does not occur.; int6 & sent22 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the pitying ding occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the pitying ding happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cessation happens then not the polymericness but the know happens. sent2: that that the singling Firenze does not occur and the arrogance happens is not incorrect is triggered by that the chloroticness does not occur. sent3: if the swapping surcoat does not occur then the fact that the ringer and the hijack happens is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the non-polymericness and the knowing occurs does not hold. sent5: if the fact that the leash happens and/or the Dalmatianness happens is not right the cessation happens. sent6: if that the swapping surcoat happens but the subjunctive does not occur is incorrect that the swapping surcoat does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: that both the polymericness and the knowing happens does not hold. sent8: that the ringer does not occur and/or the nidicolousness does not occur is brought about by that the agency does not occur. sent9: the cessation occurs if the fact that that the leash occurs and/or the Dalmatian does not occur is not wrong is incorrect. sent10: if the agency occurs the Dalmatian happens. sent11: if the cessation occurs the polymericness does not occur. sent12: the polymericness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the chloroticness does not occur if that the chloroticness but not the convertibleness occurs is wrong is correct. sent14: that the nidicolousness does not occur triggers the pitying ding. sent15: if the cyprianness occurs then that the swapping surcoat and the non-subjunctiveness happens does not hold. sent16: the ringer does not occur if the fact that the ringer and the hijacking occurs does not hold. sent17: the fact that the Dalmatian occurs hold. sent18: the pitying ding is prevented by the non-nidicolousness. sent19: that the ringer does not occur causes that not the knowing but the nidicolousness occurs. sent20: the cyprianness occurs if not the singling Firenze but the arrogance occurs. sent21: that either the leash happens or the Dalmatian does not occur or both is not true if the agency happens. sent22: that the pitying ding does not occur is triggered by that the ringer does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agency occurs.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the leash and/or the non-Dalmatianness occurs is not right.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the cessation occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: not the polymericness but the know occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the agency does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the ringer does not occur and/or the nidicolousness does not occur.; int6 & sent22 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__