that there exists something such that if it does not bury digitalization that it does not tail and it is a URL does not hold does not hold.
sent1: if the mangrove is a URL then the fact that it is not a kind of a stew and does ladle district is incorrect. sent2: if the phytotoxin is not a kind of a URL that it does not ladle hemerobiid and is a kind of a whitehead does not hold. sent3: the fact that the phytotoxin does not bury digitalization and is a modality is not correct if it does not bury negative. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not a repertoire is true that it is not illicit and it is testamentary is false. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a docket then that it is not a bundle and it buries supinator is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it does not bury protectionism then the fact that it is not a ECCM and abuses fucoid is false. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if that it does ladle Clorox hold the fact that it is not illicit and it does derail is not correct hold. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a breadboard is correct then it does not understand and is a AMD. sent9: that the phytotoxin is not a kind of a schizogony but it is a kind of a tail is false if it does not bury on-license. sent10: if the phytotoxin does bury digitalization then that it is not a tail and it is a URL is wrong. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not bury digitalization then that it is a tail that is a URL is wrong. sent12: if the phytotoxin does not bury digitalization then that it does not tail and it is a kind of a URL is not correct. sent13: the fact that something is not a poll and does ladle climax does not hold if it does not ladle mangrove. sent14: there is something such that if it does not bury digitalization then it is not a tail but a URL. sent15: the fact that the phytotoxin is a tail that is a URL does not hold if that it does not bury digitalization is right. sent16: there is something such that if it does bury digitalization that it is not a tail and it is a kind of a URL is not correct. sent17: if something does not scramble then the fact that it is not fictile and it abuses parallelism is false. sent18: if something is not a kind of a pupil then that it does not tail and buries eucalyptus is not right. sent19: if the phytotoxin does not bury digitalization it is not a tail but a URL.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not ladle mangrove then that it is not a poll and it ladles climax does not hold.
sent13 -> int1: if the Clorox does not ladle mangrove then that it is not a poll and does ladle climax is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not bury digitalization that it does not tail and it is a URL does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mangrove is a URL then the fact that it is not a kind of a stew and does ladle district is incorrect. sent2: if the phytotoxin is not a kind of a URL that it does not ladle hemerobiid and is a kind of a whitehead does not hold. sent3: the fact that the phytotoxin does not bury digitalization and is a modality is not correct if it does not bury negative. sent4: there is something such that if that it is not a repertoire is true that it is not illicit and it is testamentary is false. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a docket then that it is not a bundle and it buries supinator is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it does not bury protectionism then the fact that it is not a ECCM and abuses fucoid is false. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if that it does ladle Clorox hold the fact that it is not illicit and it does derail is not correct hold. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a breadboard is correct then it does not understand and is a AMD. sent9: that the phytotoxin is not a kind of a schizogony but it is a kind of a tail is false if it does not bury on-license. sent10: if the phytotoxin does bury digitalization then that it is not a tail and it is a URL is wrong. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not bury digitalization then that it is a tail that is a URL is wrong. sent12: if the phytotoxin does not bury digitalization then that it does not tail and it is a kind of a URL is not correct. sent13: the fact that something is not a poll and does ladle climax does not hold if it does not ladle mangrove. sent14: there is something such that if it does not bury digitalization then it is not a tail but a URL. sent15: the fact that the phytotoxin is a tail that is a URL does not hold if that it does not bury digitalization is right. sent16: there is something such that if it does bury digitalization that it is not a tail and it is a kind of a URL is not correct. sent17: if something does not scramble then the fact that it is not fictile and it abuses parallelism is false. sent18: if something is not a kind of a pupil then that it does not tail and buries eucalyptus is not right. sent19: if the phytotoxin does not bury digitalization it is not a tail but a URL. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__