that the pommy is a failure and does dictate Paraclete is wrong.
sent1: the hatch is a bed-and-breakfast. sent2: the fact that the fact that the pommy is not Peloponnesian does not hold hold if that either the opposition is not a lower or it is a Wylie or both does not hold. sent3: the walkie-talkie is a resignation. sent4: the walkie-talkie is a resignation if it is a bed-and-breakfast. sent5: the pommy is not a bed-and-breakfast if that the walkie-talkie is both not a Wylie and not a lower is false. sent6: the opposition is a kind of a tetracycline and it is a kind of a bed-and-breakfast. sent7: something is a failure if it does lower. sent8: the opposition is a bed-and-breakfast. sent9: that something does not lower and/or it is a Wylie is not right if it is not a kind of a resignation. sent10: if something sags goosefish it is a kind of a subservience. sent11: if something is Peloponnesian it is a Wylie. sent12: something is a bed-and-breakfast or not a tetracycline or both if it is Peloponnesian. sent13: if the opposition is either not Peloponnesian or a tetracycline or both the dining-hall is a tetracycline. sent14: if the walkie-talkie is a failure then that the fact that it is not a Wylie and it does not lower hold is not true. sent15: something is Peloponnesian if it is a kind of a tetracycline. sent16: if something is not a tetracycline the fact that it is a kind of a failure and it dictates Paraclete is wrong. sent17: the pommy is a kind of a lower if the opposition is a kind of a Wylie. sent18: that the walkie-talkie does sag pommy and is not a shirtdress is incorrect. sent19: if the walkie-talkie is a resignation the pommy does dictate Paraclete.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the opposition is a tetracycline is not false.; sent15 -> int2: if the opposition is a tetracycline then it is Peloponnesian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the opposition is Peloponnesian is true.; sent11 -> int4: the opposition is a kind of a Wylie if it is Peloponnesian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the opposition is a kind of a Wylie.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the pommy does lower.; sent7 -> int7: the pommy is a kind of a failure if it does lower.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the pommy is a failure.; sent19 & sent3 -> int9: the pommy does dictate Paraclete.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pommy is a failure and it does dictate Paraclete is not right.
sent16 -> int10: if the pommy is not a tetracycline the fact that it is a kind of a failure and does dictate Paraclete does not hold.; sent12 -> int11: the pommy is a bed-and-breakfast and/or it is not a kind of a tetracycline if it is Peloponnesian.; sent9 -> int12: the fact that the opposition is not a lower and/or is a Wylie is not true if it is not a kind of a resignation.; sent18 -> int13: there is something such that that it sags pommy and is not a shirtdress is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pommy is a failure and does dictate Paraclete is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the hatch is a bed-and-breakfast. sent2: the fact that the fact that the pommy is not Peloponnesian does not hold hold if that either the opposition is not a lower or it is a Wylie or both does not hold. sent3: the walkie-talkie is a resignation. sent4: the walkie-talkie is a resignation if it is a bed-and-breakfast. sent5: the pommy is not a bed-and-breakfast if that the walkie-talkie is both not a Wylie and not a lower is false. sent6: the opposition is a kind of a tetracycline and it is a kind of a bed-and-breakfast. sent7: something is a failure if it does lower. sent8: the opposition is a bed-and-breakfast. sent9: that something does not lower and/or it is a Wylie is not right if it is not a kind of a resignation. sent10: if something sags goosefish it is a kind of a subservience. sent11: if something is Peloponnesian it is a Wylie. sent12: something is a bed-and-breakfast or not a tetracycline or both if it is Peloponnesian. sent13: if the opposition is either not Peloponnesian or a tetracycline or both the dining-hall is a tetracycline. sent14: if the walkie-talkie is a failure then that the fact that it is not a Wylie and it does not lower hold is not true. sent15: something is Peloponnesian if it is a kind of a tetracycline. sent16: if something is not a tetracycline the fact that it is a kind of a failure and it dictates Paraclete is wrong. sent17: the pommy is a kind of a lower if the opposition is a kind of a Wylie. sent18: that the walkie-talkie does sag pommy and is not a shirtdress is incorrect. sent19: if the walkie-talkie is a resignation the pommy does dictate Paraclete. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the opposition is a tetracycline is not false.; sent15 -> int2: if the opposition is a tetracycline then it is Peloponnesian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the opposition is Peloponnesian is true.; sent11 -> int4: the opposition is a kind of a Wylie if it is Peloponnesian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the opposition is a kind of a Wylie.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the pommy does lower.; sent7 -> int7: the pommy is a kind of a failure if it does lower.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the pommy is a failure.; sent19 & sent3 -> int9: the pommy does dictate Paraclete.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__