the downpour occurs.
sent1: that the blinkering Voznesenski occurs is not wrong if the hungering saturation happens. sent2: that the fact that the sailing does not occur and the blinkering Rochambeau does not occur is correct does not hold. sent3: if the blinkering Voznesenski occurs then the modulating happens. sent4: that the euphoricness does not occur brings about that both the hungering saturation and the spar happens. sent5: if that the orchestrating curiosity occurs but the rejoinder does not occur is not correct the cockney occurs. sent6: the febrileness occurs. sent7: if that the orchestrating piedmont does not occur is true then the fact that the atrophying does not occur and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur is false. sent8: if the fact that both the non-disjunctiveness and the someness happens does not hold the non-disjunctive happens. sent9: the forgery does not occur. sent10: if the burglarizing opium does not occur that the Liberian does not occur and the burglarizing whipstitch does not occur is not true. sent11: that the orchestrating piedmont happens but the disjunctiveness does not occur prevents that the downpour does not occur. sent12: the fact that the Tasmanianness happens is not false. sent13: the amount occurs. sent14: if the modulating happens that the orchestrating curiosity but not the rejoinder happens does not hold. sent15: the disjunctiveness does not occur. sent16: if the orchestrating piedmont does not occur then the fact that the atrophy occurs and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur is not correct. sent17: the atrophy does not occur and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur. sent18: that the flush does not occur and the hungering vitrification does not occur is right. sent19: the euphoricness does not occur if the fact that not the irritating but the foliateness occurs is not true. sent20: that the atrophying occurs and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur does not hold. sent21: that the disjunctiveness does not occur but the someness happens is wrong if the cockneiness happens. sent22: the orchestrating piedmont occurs but the downpour does not occur if that the disjunctiveness occurs hold. sent23: the fact that the atrophy does not occur and the orchestrating bathroom occurs does not hold. sent24: if the orchestrating piedmont does not occur then that the atrophy does not occur but the orchestrating bathroom occurs is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the orchestrating piedmont does not occur hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the atrophy does not occur and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the orchestrating piedmont occurs.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: both the orchestrating piedmont and the non-disjunctiveness occurs.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the downpour does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the downpour occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the blinkering Voznesenski occurs is not wrong if the hungering saturation happens. sent2: that the fact that the sailing does not occur and the blinkering Rochambeau does not occur is correct does not hold. sent3: if the blinkering Voznesenski occurs then the modulating happens. sent4: that the euphoricness does not occur brings about that both the hungering saturation and the spar happens. sent5: if that the orchestrating curiosity occurs but the rejoinder does not occur is not correct the cockney occurs. sent6: the febrileness occurs. sent7: if that the orchestrating piedmont does not occur is true then the fact that the atrophying does not occur and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur is false. sent8: if the fact that both the non-disjunctiveness and the someness happens does not hold the non-disjunctive happens. sent9: the forgery does not occur. sent10: if the burglarizing opium does not occur that the Liberian does not occur and the burglarizing whipstitch does not occur is not true. sent11: that the orchestrating piedmont happens but the disjunctiveness does not occur prevents that the downpour does not occur. sent12: the fact that the Tasmanianness happens is not false. sent13: the amount occurs. sent14: if the modulating happens that the orchestrating curiosity but not the rejoinder happens does not hold. sent15: the disjunctiveness does not occur. sent16: if the orchestrating piedmont does not occur then the fact that the atrophy occurs and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur is not correct. sent17: the atrophy does not occur and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur. sent18: that the flush does not occur and the hungering vitrification does not occur is right. sent19: the euphoricness does not occur if the fact that not the irritating but the foliateness occurs is not true. sent20: that the atrophying occurs and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur does not hold. sent21: that the disjunctiveness does not occur but the someness happens is wrong if the cockneiness happens. sent22: the orchestrating piedmont occurs but the downpour does not occur if that the disjunctiveness occurs hold. sent23: the fact that the atrophy does not occur and the orchestrating bathroom occurs does not hold. sent24: if the orchestrating piedmont does not occur then that the atrophy does not occur but the orchestrating bathroom occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the orchestrating piedmont does not occur hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the atrophy does not occur and the orchestrating bathroom does not occur is not correct.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the orchestrating piedmont occurs.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: both the orchestrating piedmont and the non-disjunctiveness occurs.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__