the fact that there is something such that if it is not a wheel then the fact that it is not dualistic or not a Rachycentridae or both does not hold is not right.
sent1: if the aqualung is not a soporific then the fact that either it is not a kind of a wheel or it is not paramilitary or both does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does not write then the fact that it is non-cellulosid or is not a smut or both is wrong. sent3: that the aqualung is not dualistic and/or it is not a Rachycentridae does not hold if it is not a wheel. sent4: the fact that the aqualung either is a Bartlesville or is not a kind of a Rachycentridae or both is not correct if it is not biotypic. sent5: the fact that the aqualung is not a triangulation or it is not dualistic or both is false if it does not dun solicitude. sent6: the fact that either the flashing does not render gunlock or it is not a dedication or both is false if it is not toxicological. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a crocodile either it is not catoptrics or it is not a bellpull or both. sent8: that the outsider is either not dualistic or not incurious or both is not correct if it is a lovage. sent9: there exists something such that if it rendezvous concatenation then the fact that it is not a kind of a pear and/or it is not a superintendent does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not anticlinal the fact that it does not write and/or it does not rendezvous Khedive is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not dine then that it is either a Delacroix or non-incendiary or both is wrong.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a wheel then the fact that it is not dualistic or not a Rachycentridae or both does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the aqualung is not a soporific then the fact that either it is not a kind of a wheel or it is not paramilitary or both does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does not write then the fact that it is non-cellulosid or is not a smut or both is wrong. sent3: that the aqualung is not dualistic and/or it is not a Rachycentridae does not hold if it is not a wheel. sent4: the fact that the aqualung either is a Bartlesville or is not a kind of a Rachycentridae or both is not correct if it is not biotypic. sent5: the fact that the aqualung is not a triangulation or it is not dualistic or both is false if it does not dun solicitude. sent6: the fact that either the flashing does not render gunlock or it is not a dedication or both is false if it is not toxicological. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a crocodile either it is not catoptrics or it is not a bellpull or both. sent8: that the outsider is either not dualistic or not incurious or both is not correct if it is a lovage. sent9: there exists something such that if it rendezvous concatenation then the fact that it is not a kind of a pear and/or it is not a superintendent does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not anticlinal the fact that it does not write and/or it does not rendezvous Khedive is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not dine then that it is either a Delacroix or non-incendiary or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__