the no-brainer but not the reconcilableness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the piloting does not occur and the punch does not occur is false if the exacerbating jellyleaf does not occur. sent2: if that the piloting does not occur and the punch does not occur is incorrect the punch occurs. sent3: the on-the-jobness happens. sent4: the brightness and the Timorese occurs. sent5: the arousal triggers that the discarding Pitman does not occur. sent6: the piloting does not occur if the fact that the non-phonologicalness and the egress occurs is incorrect. sent7: the piloting occurs. sent8: the nominativeness happens. sent9: if both the egress and the exacerbating jellyleaf happens then the reconcilableness does not occur. sent10: both the skipping and the non-ambassadorialness occurs. sent11: that the legitimation but not the branchialness occurs is correct. sent12: the arousal happens. sent13: that the homeopathy occurs and the walk happens is wrong. sent14: the native does not occur. sent15: if the luxation happens the perpetration does not occur. sent16: the misdirection and the admissibleness happens. sent17: the digestibleness does not occur. sent18: the typification but not the usury happens. sent19: the Timoreseness does not occur if the nonprescriptionness happens. sent20: the exacerbating jellyleaf happens. sent21: the fact that the non-solubleness and the elfinness occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the non-phonologicalness and the egress occurs does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the piloting does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: both the non-phonologicalness and the egress happens.; int3 -> int4: the egress happens.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the egress happens and the exacerbating jellyleaf occurs.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the reconcilableness does not occur.;
the punch happens.
$hypothesis$ = the no-brainer but not the reconcilableness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the piloting does not occur and the punch does not occur is false if the exacerbating jellyleaf does not occur. sent2: if that the piloting does not occur and the punch does not occur is incorrect the punch occurs. sent3: the on-the-jobness happens. sent4: the brightness and the Timorese occurs. sent5: the arousal triggers that the discarding Pitman does not occur. sent6: the piloting does not occur if the fact that the non-phonologicalness and the egress occurs is incorrect. sent7: the piloting occurs. sent8: the nominativeness happens. sent9: if both the egress and the exacerbating jellyleaf happens then the reconcilableness does not occur. sent10: both the skipping and the non-ambassadorialness occurs. sent11: that the legitimation but not the branchialness occurs is correct. sent12: the arousal happens. sent13: that the homeopathy occurs and the walk happens is wrong. sent14: the native does not occur. sent15: if the luxation happens the perpetration does not occur. sent16: the misdirection and the admissibleness happens. sent17: the digestibleness does not occur. sent18: the typification but not the usury happens. sent19: the Timoreseness does not occur if the nonprescriptionness happens. sent20: the exacerbating jellyleaf happens. sent21: the fact that the non-solubleness and the elfinness occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the non-phonologicalness and the egress occurs does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the piloting does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: both the non-phonologicalness and the egress happens.; int3 -> int4: the egress happens.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the egress happens and the exacerbating jellyleaf occurs.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the reconcilableness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__