that the berthing does not occur is not wrong.
sent1: if that the polypectomy occurs hold the times happens. sent2: if the fact that the empiricism does not occur hold then the terming Londoner occurs and the radiance occurs. sent3: that the timing occurs and the neap occurs prevents that the outburst happens. sent4: the fact that the beef does not occur and the unavailableness happens is wrong. sent5: the fact that that the mucking does not occur and the disobedience does not occur is not true hold. sent6: if the neap does not occur the fact that the berth happens is not incorrect. sent7: the calculousness and the polypectomy occurs. sent8: if the outburst does not occur that the beef occurs and the unavailableness does not occur is false. sent9: the fact that the beef does not occur and the unavailableness does not occur does not hold if the outburst does not occur. sent10: that not the outburst but the unavailableness occurs is not correct if the beef does not occur. sent11: that the polypectomy does not occur brings about that not the berthing but the calculousness occurs. sent12: that not the beef but the unavailableness happens does not hold if the outburst does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the fossilizing but not the spring-cleaning happens is incorrect then the empiricism does not occur. sent14: that the beef does not occur is right if the tattle does not occur and the chiasmalness occurs. sent15: the beef does not occur and the unavailableness does not occur. sent16: the calculousness happens. sent17: the fact that the fact that the beef and the non-unavailableness occurs is not right is not false. sent18: the explanation happens if the terming Londoner happens. sent19: if the explanation happens not the tattle but the chiasmalness occurs.
sent7 -> int1: the polypectomy occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the times happens is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neap occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the timing and the neap occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the outburst does not occur is not incorrect.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the beef does not occur and the unavailableness does not occur is not correct.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the neap does not occur.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the berth does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the berthing does not occur is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the polypectomy occurs hold the times happens. sent2: if the fact that the empiricism does not occur hold then the terming Londoner occurs and the radiance occurs. sent3: that the timing occurs and the neap occurs prevents that the outburst happens. sent4: the fact that the beef does not occur and the unavailableness happens is wrong. sent5: the fact that that the mucking does not occur and the disobedience does not occur is not true hold. sent6: if the neap does not occur the fact that the berth happens is not incorrect. sent7: the calculousness and the polypectomy occurs. sent8: if the outburst does not occur that the beef occurs and the unavailableness does not occur is false. sent9: the fact that the beef does not occur and the unavailableness does not occur does not hold if the outburst does not occur. sent10: that not the outburst but the unavailableness occurs is not correct if the beef does not occur. sent11: that the polypectomy does not occur brings about that not the berthing but the calculousness occurs. sent12: that not the beef but the unavailableness happens does not hold if the outburst does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the fossilizing but not the spring-cleaning happens is incorrect then the empiricism does not occur. sent14: that the beef does not occur is right if the tattle does not occur and the chiasmalness occurs. sent15: the beef does not occur and the unavailableness does not occur. sent16: the calculousness happens. sent17: the fact that the fact that the beef and the non-unavailableness occurs is not right is not false. sent18: the explanation happens if the terming Londoner happens. sent19: if the explanation happens not the tattle but the chiasmalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the polypectomy occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the times happens is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neap occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the timing and the neap occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the outburst does not occur is not incorrect.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the beef does not occur and the unavailableness does not occur is not correct.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the neap does not occur.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__