the hazard does not occur.
sent1: if the one-pieceness does not occur then the impoliteness happens or the reading avadavat happens or both. sent2: that the one-pieceness does not occur is not incorrect if the venipuncture occurs. sent3: if the etherealness does not occur then not the montaneness but the root occurs. sent4: if the nimbus does not occur then the fact that the venipuncture does not occur is not false. sent5: if that the impoliteness happens but the reading avadavat does not occur is not correct then the hazard does not occur. sent6: the nimbus and the venipuncture occurs if the montaneness does not occur. sent7: the non-heraldicness results in that not the excretoriness but the reading Danton occurs. sent8: the etherealness does not occur if the fact that the non-oticness and the seiche occurs is false. sent9: both the one-pieceness and the hazard occurs if the venipuncture does not occur. sent10: the plunk happens if the contraception happens. sent11: if the hazard occurs then the impoliteness does not occur and/or the reading avadavat does not occur. sent12: the fact that the rooting does not occur and the montaneness does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the etherealness does not occur is correct. sent13: if the fact that the root does not occur and the montaneness does not occur is not right the nimbus does not occur. sent14: that both the non-oticness and the seiche happens is wrong if the plunk happens. sent15: the fact that the impoliteness and the reading avadavat happens is not true. sent16: if the excretoriness does not occur then the follies occurs and/or the reading rival happens. sent17: the reading avadavat occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impoliteness but not the reading avadavat happens.; assump1 -> int1: the reading avadavat does not occur.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the impoliteness happens and the reading avadavat does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the hazard happens hold.
$hypothesis$ = the hazard does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the one-pieceness does not occur then the impoliteness happens or the reading avadavat happens or both. sent2: that the one-pieceness does not occur is not incorrect if the venipuncture occurs. sent3: if the etherealness does not occur then not the montaneness but the root occurs. sent4: if the nimbus does not occur then the fact that the venipuncture does not occur is not false. sent5: if that the impoliteness happens but the reading avadavat does not occur is not correct then the hazard does not occur. sent6: the nimbus and the venipuncture occurs if the montaneness does not occur. sent7: the non-heraldicness results in that not the excretoriness but the reading Danton occurs. sent8: the etherealness does not occur if the fact that the non-oticness and the seiche occurs is false. sent9: both the one-pieceness and the hazard occurs if the venipuncture does not occur. sent10: the plunk happens if the contraception happens. sent11: if the hazard occurs then the impoliteness does not occur and/or the reading avadavat does not occur. sent12: the fact that the rooting does not occur and the montaneness does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the etherealness does not occur is correct. sent13: if the fact that the root does not occur and the montaneness does not occur is not right the nimbus does not occur. sent14: that both the non-oticness and the seiche happens is wrong if the plunk happens. sent15: the fact that the impoliteness and the reading avadavat happens is not true. sent16: if the excretoriness does not occur then the follies occurs and/or the reading rival happens. sent17: the reading avadavat occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impoliteness but not the reading avadavat happens.; assump1 -> int1: the reading avadavat does not occur.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the impoliteness happens and the reading avadavat does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__