the fact that that the reform does not occur is prevented by that the acetylicness happens is wrong.
sent1: the fact that if the minting achondrite happens then the chance-medley does not occur is correct. sent2: the acetylicness happens but the chance-medley does not occur if the minting achondrite happens. sent3: the acetylicness happens and the chance-medley does not occur. sent4: the reforming does not occur if that that the predominating and/or the declaring occurs is not incorrect does not hold. sent5: that the acetylicness does not occur and the chance-medley does not occur is caused by the minting achondrite. sent6: if that the minting achondrite does not occur is not incorrect the fact that the reforming occurs hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the minting achondrite occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the acetylicness does not occur and the chance-medley does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the acetylicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acetylicness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the minting achondrite does not occur hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the reform occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the adaptiveness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the reform does not occur is prevented by that the acetylicness happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the minting achondrite happens then the chance-medley does not occur is correct. sent2: the acetylicness happens but the chance-medley does not occur if the minting achondrite happens. sent3: the acetylicness happens and the chance-medley does not occur. sent4: the reforming does not occur if that that the predominating and/or the declaring occurs is not incorrect does not hold. sent5: that the acetylicness does not occur and the chance-medley does not occur is caused by the minting achondrite. sent6: if that the minting achondrite does not occur is not incorrect the fact that the reforming occurs hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the minting achondrite occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the acetylicness does not occur and the chance-medley does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the acetylicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acetylicness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the minting achondrite does not occur hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the reform occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__