if the venting alpha happens then that the elongating does not occur but the compositeness occurs is not correct.
sent1: that not the foaling NT but the venting hyponymy occurs does not hold if the inactivity happens. sent2: that the actinomycetalness does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness occurs is not right. sent3: if the foaling flabbiness happens then the venting hyponymy happens. sent4: the effacement does not occur if that the effacement but not the venting alpha happens is wrong. sent5: the unavailableness occurs. sent6: the fact that the soaring does not occur but the yips happens is not right if the civility occurs. sent7: the fact that the unregretfulness does not occur hold. sent8: that both the elongating and the compositeness occurs is incorrect if the venting alpha happens. sent9: the cronyism does not occur. sent10: the foaling thievishness happens. sent11: that the effacement occurs and the venting alpha does not occur is wrong if the venting hyponymy happens. sent12: that the composite occurs is true. sent13: that the venting alpha does not occur is caused by that both the elongating and the composite happens. sent14: the insincereness does not occur. sent15: the inheritance does not occur and the ludo occurs. sent16: the fact that that the blocking does not occur is not correct is incorrect if both the non-barometricness and the telling happens. sent17: if the elongating does not occur and the composite occurs then the venting alpha happens. sent18: that the cataplasticness occurs is not false. sent19: that not the elongating but the compositeness occurs is brought about by that the venting alpha occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the elongating but the compositeness happens.;
the effacement does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the venting alpha happens then that the elongating does not occur but the compositeness occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the foaling NT but the venting hyponymy occurs does not hold if the inactivity happens. sent2: that the actinomycetalness does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness occurs is not right. sent3: if the foaling flabbiness happens then the venting hyponymy happens. sent4: the effacement does not occur if that the effacement but not the venting alpha happens is wrong. sent5: the unavailableness occurs. sent6: the fact that the soaring does not occur but the yips happens is not right if the civility occurs. sent7: the fact that the unregretfulness does not occur hold. sent8: that both the elongating and the compositeness occurs is incorrect if the venting alpha happens. sent9: the cronyism does not occur. sent10: the foaling thievishness happens. sent11: that the effacement occurs and the venting alpha does not occur is wrong if the venting hyponymy happens. sent12: that the composite occurs is true. sent13: that the venting alpha does not occur is caused by that both the elongating and the composite happens. sent14: the insincereness does not occur. sent15: the inheritance does not occur and the ludo occurs. sent16: the fact that that the blocking does not occur is not correct is incorrect if both the non-barometricness and the telling happens. sent17: if the elongating does not occur and the composite occurs then the venting alpha happens. sent18: that the cataplasticness occurs is not false. sent19: that not the elongating but the compositeness occurs is brought about by that the venting alpha occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the elongating but the compositeness happens.; __UNKNOWN__