if the nekton does impede inquirer the inquirer is a Sealyham.
sent1: the nekton does not impede refreshment and is a misfit. sent2: if the corrective is a haying and sides silicate then it is a Dix. sent3: the nekton is a stymie if something does side dessiatine and it is maladroit. sent4: something that is not a young does impede inquirer and/or sides dessiatine. sent5: if the inquirer does refine Shahaptian and it is a Malay then it is a kind of a puniness. sent6: the inquirer is a kind of a Sealyham if there exists something such that it impedes inquirer and does side dessiatine. sent7: that the nekton does side dessiatine if the nekton is not maladroit but it is a stymie is right. sent8: the nekton is not maladroit but it is a stymie. sent9: there exists something such that it sides nekton. sent10: the refreshment is a Sealyham. sent11: if the inquirer is maladroit and it is a Sealyham it does side dessiatine. sent12: the nekton is not a Sealyham but it does impede inquirer. sent13: there is something such that it does side dessiatine. sent14: the nekton is an anemone.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nekton does impede inquirer.; sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the nekton sides dessiatine.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the nekton impedes inquirer and it sides dessiatine.; int2 -> int3: something does impede inquirer and it does side dessiatine.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the inquirer is a Sealyham.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the Shahaptian is a Sealyham.
sent4 -> int5: if the Shahaptian is not a young then it impedes inquirer and/or it sides dessiatine.; sent1 -> int6: something does not impede refreshment but it is a misfit.;
$hypothesis$ = if the nekton does impede inquirer the inquirer is a Sealyham. ; $context$ = sent1: the nekton does not impede refreshment and is a misfit. sent2: if the corrective is a haying and sides silicate then it is a Dix. sent3: the nekton is a stymie if something does side dessiatine and it is maladroit. sent4: something that is not a young does impede inquirer and/or sides dessiatine. sent5: if the inquirer does refine Shahaptian and it is a Malay then it is a kind of a puniness. sent6: the inquirer is a kind of a Sealyham if there exists something such that it impedes inquirer and does side dessiatine. sent7: that the nekton does side dessiatine if the nekton is not maladroit but it is a stymie is right. sent8: the nekton is not maladroit but it is a stymie. sent9: there exists something such that it sides nekton. sent10: the refreshment is a Sealyham. sent11: if the inquirer is maladroit and it is a Sealyham it does side dessiatine. sent12: the nekton is not a Sealyham but it does impede inquirer. sent13: there is something such that it does side dessiatine. sent14: the nekton is an anemone. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nekton does impede inquirer.; sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the nekton sides dessiatine.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the nekton impedes inquirer and it sides dessiatine.; int2 -> int3: something does impede inquirer and it does side dessiatine.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the inquirer is a Sealyham.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__