there is something such that if that it is a creak and it does not singe is false then it is a Necturus.
sent1: that if that something is an encephalopathy and not a creak is wrong then it is a Furnarius is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the gamp is a creak and it is impractical is not true then it is a conference. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it does manhandle furniture and is not a noctiluca is true does not hold it is an antiaircraft. sent4: the petal is naval if that it does singe and is a vocative is not right.
the bridgehead is a kind of a Furnarius if the fact that it is an encephalopathy and not a creak does not hold.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a creak and it does not singe is false then it is a Necturus. ; $context$ = sent1: that if that something is an encephalopathy and not a creak is wrong then it is a Furnarius is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the gamp is a creak and it is impractical is not true then it is a conference. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it does manhandle furniture and is not a noctiluca is true does not hold it is an antiaircraft. sent4: the petal is naval if that it does singe and is a vocative is not right. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__