the recording is not a fan.
sent1: if the troche is not unquestionable the fact that the recording does not coach Turk's-cap but it is unquestionable does not hold. sent2: the fact that the espadrille is not sensorineural and hauls does not hold if that the guano is choreographic is not wrong. sent3: the guano is choreographic if the cocklebur is not singles or it is choreographic or both. sent4: if the driveway is Slavonic and does suckle then the scute is not Slavonic. sent5: the cocklebur does not single and/or is choreographic. sent6: something is choreographic if it is a Hinduism and is not dizygotic. sent7: if there are non-Slavonic things then that the humorist does not corkscrew regurgitation but it is non-Slavonic does not hold. sent8: if the troche is not dialectic then the spironolactone is not unquestionable. sent9: that the spironolactone is not dialectic is true. sent10: if the recording is not unquestionable then that the troche does not fan is not wrong. sent11: the fact that the spironolactone does read guano is correct. sent12: if the fact that the recording does not coach Turk's-cap and is unquestionable is incorrect then it is not a kind of a fan. sent13: if something is sensorineural then that the hairdresser is not sensorineural and it does not revel is wrong. sent14: something does not corkscrew Senhor if that it is not sensorineural and it is not a revel is wrong. sent15: something is dialectic if it is both blastomeric and non-atomic. sent16: the driveway is Slavonic and it suckles if there exists something such that it does not read Scholastic. sent17: if the fact that the spironolactone is not a fan and it is not atomic is false then that the turnoff is not atomic is not incorrect. sent18: the trochlear does not read Scholastic if something is not a Cercidium but it is a lingonberry. sent19: the dentine is not a kind of a Cercidium but it is a lingonberry if the hairdresser does not corkscrew Senhor. sent20: the spironolactone is blastomeric but it is not atomic if the troche is not blastomeric. sent21: the espadrille is sensorineural if the fact that it is not sensorineural and does haul is wrong. sent22: the recording is a fan that is not a dialectic if the spironolactone is blastomeric. sent23: if the fact that the humorist does not corkscrew regurgitation and is Slavonic is false then the recording does not coach Turk's-cap. sent24: the Turk's-cap is not dialectic. sent25: that the spironolactone does not fan and it is not atomic is not true if something does not coach Turk's-cap.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that the troche does not override and it is not unquestionable is wrong hold.; sent15 -> int1: the spironolactone is a kind of a dialectic if it is blastomeric and it is not atomic.;
the recording is a kind of a fan.
$hypothesis$ = the recording is not a fan. ; $context$ = sent1: if the troche is not unquestionable the fact that the recording does not coach Turk's-cap but it is unquestionable does not hold. sent2: the fact that the espadrille is not sensorineural and hauls does not hold if that the guano is choreographic is not wrong. sent3: the guano is choreographic if the cocklebur is not singles or it is choreographic or both. sent4: if the driveway is Slavonic and does suckle then the scute is not Slavonic. sent5: the cocklebur does not single and/or is choreographic. sent6: something is choreographic if it is a Hinduism and is not dizygotic. sent7: if there are non-Slavonic things then that the humorist does not corkscrew regurgitation but it is non-Slavonic does not hold. sent8: if the troche is not dialectic then the spironolactone is not unquestionable. sent9: that the spironolactone is not dialectic is true. sent10: if the recording is not unquestionable then that the troche does not fan is not wrong. sent11: the fact that the spironolactone does read guano is correct. sent12: if the fact that the recording does not coach Turk's-cap and is unquestionable is incorrect then it is not a kind of a fan. sent13: if something is sensorineural then that the hairdresser is not sensorineural and it does not revel is wrong. sent14: something does not corkscrew Senhor if that it is not sensorineural and it is not a revel is wrong. sent15: something is dialectic if it is both blastomeric and non-atomic. sent16: the driveway is Slavonic and it suckles if there exists something such that it does not read Scholastic. sent17: if the fact that the spironolactone is not a fan and it is not atomic is false then that the turnoff is not atomic is not incorrect. sent18: the trochlear does not read Scholastic if something is not a Cercidium but it is a lingonberry. sent19: the dentine is not a kind of a Cercidium but it is a lingonberry if the hairdresser does not corkscrew Senhor. sent20: the spironolactone is blastomeric but it is not atomic if the troche is not blastomeric. sent21: the espadrille is sensorineural if the fact that it is not sensorineural and does haul is wrong. sent22: the recording is a fan that is not a dialectic if the spironolactone is blastomeric. sent23: if the fact that the humorist does not corkscrew regurgitation and is Slavonic is false then the recording does not coach Turk's-cap. sent24: the Turk's-cap is not dialectic. sent25: that the spironolactone does not fan and it is not atomic is not true if something does not coach Turk's-cap. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that the troche does not override and it is not unquestionable is wrong hold.; sent15 -> int1: the spironolactone is a kind of a dialectic if it is blastomeric and it is not atomic.; __UNKNOWN__