the fact that the fact that the caregiver does jumble papist or it is not a sitar or both does not hold is right.
sent1: the fact that the good-king-henry is a sideswipe and/or it does not jumble papist does not hold. sent2: if the sign is effortful the thoroughfare is not a sitar. sent3: something is a sitar if it is a dovekie. sent4: the oxtail jumbles papist. sent5: the thoroughfare is not a signet. sent6: if something is effortful it is a sitar. sent7: the sign jumbles papist if the caregiver is a kind of a sitar. sent8: if the sign is a kind of a sitar then the fact that the caregiver is a kind of a dovekie or it is not a kind of a sitar or both is not right. sent9: if the fact that the sign is a sitar is not incorrect then that the caregiver does jumble papist or it is not a kind of a sitar or both is not correct. sent10: that the gynophore jumbles Onega or it does not personify confutation or both is not right. sent11: that that either the caregiver is effortful or it is not a sitar or both is true is not right if that the thoroughfare is a sitar hold. sent12: if the sign is a kind of a dovekie it does jumble papist. sent13: the caregiver is a kind of a sitar. sent14: the sign is a dovekie if the thoroughfare is effortful. sent15: the thoroughfare is not non-effortful. sent16: if the thoroughfare jumbles papist the caregiver is not effortful.
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the sign is a dovekie is not wrong.; sent3 -> int2: if the sign is a dovekie then that it is a sitar is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sign is a kind of a sitar.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the caregiver does jumble papist or it is not a sitar or both does not hold is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the good-king-henry is a sideswipe and/or it does not jumble papist does not hold. sent2: if the sign is effortful the thoroughfare is not a sitar. sent3: something is a sitar if it is a dovekie. sent4: the oxtail jumbles papist. sent5: the thoroughfare is not a signet. sent6: if something is effortful it is a sitar. sent7: the sign jumbles papist if the caregiver is a kind of a sitar. sent8: if the sign is a kind of a sitar then the fact that the caregiver is a kind of a dovekie or it is not a kind of a sitar or both is not right. sent9: if the fact that the sign is a sitar is not incorrect then that the caregiver does jumble papist or it is not a kind of a sitar or both is not correct. sent10: that the gynophore jumbles Onega or it does not personify confutation or both is not right. sent11: that that either the caregiver is effortful or it is not a sitar or both is true is not right if that the thoroughfare is a sitar hold. sent12: if the sign is a kind of a dovekie it does jumble papist. sent13: the caregiver is a kind of a sitar. sent14: the sign is a dovekie if the thoroughfare is effortful. sent15: the thoroughfare is not non-effortful. sent16: if the thoroughfare jumbles papist the caregiver is not effortful. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the sign is a dovekie is not wrong.; sent3 -> int2: if the sign is a dovekie then that it is a sitar is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sign is a kind of a sitar.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__