the strengthening gatherer happens.
sent1: if that the snookering windburn does not occur and the glass occurs is not correct then the fact that the glass does not occur is true. sent2: that the disentangling Tarkovsky occurs is incorrect. sent3: not the disentangling Tarkovsky but the denigration occurs if the submission does not occur. sent4: if the glass does not occur then the Chineseness and the incommensurateness happens. sent5: the strengthening gatherer does not occur if the submission occurs and the haymaker happens. sent6: not the disentangling Tarkovsky but the submission occurs. sent7: the Uruguayan occurs. sent8: the haymaker happens and the incommensurateness occurs. sent9: the incommensurateness happens.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the submission does not occur is false.; sent8 -> int2: the haymaker occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the submission happens and the haymaker occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the denigration happens and the repair occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the strengthening gatherer happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the snookering windburn does not occur and the glass occurs is not correct then the fact that the glass does not occur is true. sent2: that the disentangling Tarkovsky occurs is incorrect. sent3: not the disentangling Tarkovsky but the denigration occurs if the submission does not occur. sent4: if the glass does not occur then the Chineseness and the incommensurateness happens. sent5: the strengthening gatherer does not occur if the submission occurs and the haymaker happens. sent6: not the disentangling Tarkovsky but the submission occurs. sent7: the Uruguayan occurs. sent8: the haymaker happens and the incommensurateness occurs. sent9: the incommensurateness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the submission does not occur is false.; sent8 -> int2: the haymaker occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the submission happens and the haymaker occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__