the shipwreck does coexist.
sent1: if the shipwreck is offing then it is inculpatory. sent2: the fact that the shipwreck does coexist if that the shipwreck is inculpatory is not wrong is not incorrect. sent3: everything is not difficult and it is a sarcomere. sent4: if the chlorophyll is either not an australopithecine or a utilitarianism or both then the shipwreck traffics shipwreck. sent5: the chlorophyll is not a kind of an australopithecine if the ophthalmoscope is not difficult and is a kind of a sarcomere.
sent3 -> int1: the ophthalmoscope is both not difficult and a sarcomere.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the chlorophyll is not australopithecine.; int2 -> int3: either the chlorophyll is not an australopithecine or it is a utilitarianism or both.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the shipwreck traffics shipwreck.;
$hypothesis$ = the shipwreck does coexist. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shipwreck is offing then it is inculpatory. sent2: the fact that the shipwreck does coexist if that the shipwreck is inculpatory is not wrong is not incorrect. sent3: everything is not difficult and it is a sarcomere. sent4: if the chlorophyll is either not an australopithecine or a utilitarianism or both then the shipwreck traffics shipwreck. sent5: the chlorophyll is not a kind of an australopithecine if the ophthalmoscope is not difficult and is a kind of a sarcomere. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the ophthalmoscope is both not difficult and a sarcomere.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the chlorophyll is not australopithecine.; int2 -> int3: either the chlorophyll is not an australopithecine or it is a utilitarianism or both.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the shipwreck traffics shipwreck.; __UNKNOWN__