that the heliacalness and the spiritualisticness happens if the meteoricness does not occur is not correct.
sent1: that the disagreement does not occur yields that the palatalizing pragmatics happens and the palatalizing neckband occurs. sent2: the palatalizing manipulator and the nourishing happens. sent3: that the meteoricness does not occur leads to that the heliacalness happens and the publicness occurs. sent4: if the prizefighting does not occur the backstopping Antichrist and the arithmeticalness occurs. sent5: if the domination does not occur the scopalness happens and the backstopping Hadrosauridae happens. sent6: the backstopping Hadrosauridae does not occur. sent7: if both the non-spiritualisticness and the non-meteoricness occurs then the disentangling does not occur. sent8: if the backstopping Hadrosauridae does not occur then both the spiritualisticness and the scopalness happens. sent9: the fact that the routemarch happens is not incorrect. sent10: if the palatalizing unvariedness does not occur the fact that both the militariness and the lecturing abele happens is not false. sent11: the scopalness occurs. sent12: that the macerativeness occurs results in that both the self-serviceness and the palatalizing backstitch happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meteoricness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the heliacalness and the public occurs.; int1 -> int2: the heliacalness happens.; sent8 & sent6 -> int3: the spiritualisticness happens and the scopalness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the spiritualisticness occurs is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the heliacalness and the spiritualisticness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the disentangling does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the heliacalness and the spiritualisticness happens if the meteoricness does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the disagreement does not occur yields that the palatalizing pragmatics happens and the palatalizing neckband occurs. sent2: the palatalizing manipulator and the nourishing happens. sent3: that the meteoricness does not occur leads to that the heliacalness happens and the publicness occurs. sent4: if the prizefighting does not occur the backstopping Antichrist and the arithmeticalness occurs. sent5: if the domination does not occur the scopalness happens and the backstopping Hadrosauridae happens. sent6: the backstopping Hadrosauridae does not occur. sent7: if both the non-spiritualisticness and the non-meteoricness occurs then the disentangling does not occur. sent8: if the backstopping Hadrosauridae does not occur then both the spiritualisticness and the scopalness happens. sent9: the fact that the routemarch happens is not incorrect. sent10: if the palatalizing unvariedness does not occur the fact that both the militariness and the lecturing abele happens is not false. sent11: the scopalness occurs. sent12: that the macerativeness occurs results in that both the self-serviceness and the palatalizing backstitch happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meteoricness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the heliacalness and the public occurs.; int1 -> int2: the heliacalness happens.; sent8 & sent6 -> int3: the spiritualisticness happens and the scopalness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the spiritualisticness occurs is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the heliacalness and the spiritualisticness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__