the fact that the fortifying prevents that the denying sulfa does not occur is not correct.
sent1: the Croatian does not occur. sent2: the lidlessness does not occur or the shooting does not occur or both. sent3: the deposit does not occur. sent4: the fortifying happens if either the subtilizing nuke does not occur or the yeastiness does not occur or both. sent5: the yeastiness prevents that the denying sulfa does not occur. sent6: the fact that the tooth occurs hold. sent7: the apocalypticness does not occur if the non-yeastiness and/or the apocalypticnessness happens. sent8: the argy-bargy does not occur. sent9: if either the non-biliousness or the non-jihadiness or both occurs the garnering welder does not occur. sent10: the unenthusiasticness does not occur and/or the emirate does not occur. sent11: that the argy-bargy does not occur is prevented by the planetariness. sent12: the denying strophanthin does not occur. sent13: that the Offertory does not occur is right. sent14: if the subtilizing nuke does not occur and/or the yeastiness does not occur then the fortifying does not occur. sent15: the subtilizing nuke happens and/or the yeastiness does not occur. sent16: the amygdalineness occurs. sent17: that the fortifying does not occur is not wrong if the subtilizing nuke does not occur. sent18: if the enlistment happens then the fact that the pitching imaging occurs is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fortifying happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the yeastiness does not occur is true.; assump2 -> int1: the subtilizing nuke does not occur and/or the yeastiness does not occur.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the fortifying does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the yeastiness occurs hold.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the denying sulfa happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the apocalypticness does not occur and/or the transportation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fortifying prevents that the denying sulfa does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Croatian does not occur. sent2: the lidlessness does not occur or the shooting does not occur or both. sent3: the deposit does not occur. sent4: the fortifying happens if either the subtilizing nuke does not occur or the yeastiness does not occur or both. sent5: the yeastiness prevents that the denying sulfa does not occur. sent6: the fact that the tooth occurs hold. sent7: the apocalypticness does not occur if the non-yeastiness and/or the apocalypticnessness happens. sent8: the argy-bargy does not occur. sent9: if either the non-biliousness or the non-jihadiness or both occurs the garnering welder does not occur. sent10: the unenthusiasticness does not occur and/or the emirate does not occur. sent11: that the argy-bargy does not occur is prevented by the planetariness. sent12: the denying strophanthin does not occur. sent13: that the Offertory does not occur is right. sent14: if the subtilizing nuke does not occur and/or the yeastiness does not occur then the fortifying does not occur. sent15: the subtilizing nuke happens and/or the yeastiness does not occur. sent16: the amygdalineness occurs. sent17: that the fortifying does not occur is not wrong if the subtilizing nuke does not occur. sent18: if the enlistment happens then the fact that the pitching imaging occurs is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fortifying happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the yeastiness does not occur is true.; assump2 -> int1: the subtilizing nuke does not occur and/or the yeastiness does not occur.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the fortifying does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the yeastiness occurs hold.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the denying sulfa happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__