that not the biologism but the welcoming occurs is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the ostentatiousness occurs is right. sent2: if that the teleportation occurs is not false then the undulation happens. sent3: the fact that the fact that not the rejecting but the Liechtensteinerness occurs is not wrong is incorrect. sent4: the liquidity happens if the squishing excerpt does not occur. sent5: the squishing fowl occurs. sent6: the fact that the entertaining occurs if the liquidity happens is correct. sent7: if the squishing beefsteak does not occur then not the biologism but the welcomeness happens. sent8: that the squishing beefsteak does not occur is caused by that the squishing excerpt does not occur but the liquidity occurs. sent9: the fact that not the militainment but the filming happens is false if the self-renewal does not occur. sent10: if the militainment occurs that the biologism does not occur but the welcoming happens is incorrect. sent11: that the biologism happens and the welcoming happens does not hold. sent12: the fact that the serviceableness happens and the Puranicness happens is wrong. sent13: if the precipitation happens then that both the jugglery and the halo happens is not true. sent14: the lumbosacralness and/or the non-yogisticness occurs. sent15: the squishing beefsteak happens and/or the squishing excerpt does not occur. sent16: if the squishing beefsteak occurs that the liquidity happens hold. sent17: the fact that both the biologism and the welcome happens is false if the militainment happens. sent18: the comforting happens if the whiteness happens. sent19: the self-renewal does not occur if the raffle and the non-hydropathicness happens.
sent15 & sent16 & sent4 -> int1: the liquidity occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the entertaining happens.;
not the biologism but the welcome happens.
$hypothesis$ = that not the biologism but the welcoming occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ostentatiousness occurs is right. sent2: if that the teleportation occurs is not false then the undulation happens. sent3: the fact that the fact that not the rejecting but the Liechtensteinerness occurs is not wrong is incorrect. sent4: the liquidity happens if the squishing excerpt does not occur. sent5: the squishing fowl occurs. sent6: the fact that the entertaining occurs if the liquidity happens is correct. sent7: if the squishing beefsteak does not occur then not the biologism but the welcomeness happens. sent8: that the squishing beefsteak does not occur is caused by that the squishing excerpt does not occur but the liquidity occurs. sent9: the fact that not the militainment but the filming happens is false if the self-renewal does not occur. sent10: if the militainment occurs that the biologism does not occur but the welcoming happens is incorrect. sent11: that the biologism happens and the welcoming happens does not hold. sent12: the fact that the serviceableness happens and the Puranicness happens is wrong. sent13: if the precipitation happens then that both the jugglery and the halo happens is not true. sent14: the lumbosacralness and/or the non-yogisticness occurs. sent15: the squishing beefsteak happens and/or the squishing excerpt does not occur. sent16: if the squishing beefsteak occurs that the liquidity happens hold. sent17: the fact that both the biologism and the welcome happens is false if the militainment happens. sent18: the comforting happens if the whiteness happens. sent19: the self-renewal does not occur if the raffle and the non-hydropathicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent16 & sent4 -> int1: the liquidity occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the entertaining happens.; __UNKNOWN__