the Pharisee is not a Trichodontidae but a religiosity if the oca tears.
sent1: the oca does not spectate jurist. sent2: if the Pharisee tears then the oca is a Trichodontidae. sent3: the bachelor is a kind of a bisexual and it thromboses progenitor. sent4: the oca is a heartwood. sent5: the Pharisee is not starchless but it tears if the oca is a kind of a Trichodontidae. sent6: the Pharisee thromboses teach-in. sent7: if the fact that something is a torn but it does not spectate jurist is not right then it is not a torn. sent8: if something that does tear is starchless the Pharisee is not a Trichodontidae. sent9: the Pharisee does not tear but it is starchless if the oca is a kind of a religiosity. sent10: something is a religiosity that is a kind of a Trichodontidae. sent11: there is something such that it does tear. sent12: that the Pharisee is a mechanization is correct. sent13: the oca is starchless. sent14: that that the Pharisee is a torn but it does not spectate jurist is not wrong is false if it is a mechanization. sent15: if the fact that the oca is outdoors is not wrong then the pollucite is outdoors. sent16: the sulfisoxazole is lexical. sent17: The fact that the jurist spectates sulfisoxazole is true. sent18: something is starchless. sent19: the oca is both not a Trichodontidae and a torn. sent20: the fact that the sulfisoxazole spectates jurist is true. sent21: that the kingfisher is not starchless is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the oca does tear is correct.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the oca is a torn and it is starchless.; int1 -> int2: something is a torn and starchless.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the Pharisee is not a Trichodontidae is right.;
the pollucite is outdoors and is a gneiss.
$hypothesis$ = the Pharisee is not a Trichodontidae but a religiosity if the oca tears. ; $context$ = sent1: the oca does not spectate jurist. sent2: if the Pharisee tears then the oca is a Trichodontidae. sent3: the bachelor is a kind of a bisexual and it thromboses progenitor. sent4: the oca is a heartwood. sent5: the Pharisee is not starchless but it tears if the oca is a kind of a Trichodontidae. sent6: the Pharisee thromboses teach-in. sent7: if the fact that something is a torn but it does not spectate jurist is not right then it is not a torn. sent8: if something that does tear is starchless the Pharisee is not a Trichodontidae. sent9: the Pharisee does not tear but it is starchless if the oca is a kind of a religiosity. sent10: something is a religiosity that is a kind of a Trichodontidae. sent11: there is something such that it does tear. sent12: that the Pharisee is a mechanization is correct. sent13: the oca is starchless. sent14: that that the Pharisee is a torn but it does not spectate jurist is not wrong is false if it is a mechanization. sent15: if the fact that the oca is outdoors is not wrong then the pollucite is outdoors. sent16: the sulfisoxazole is lexical. sent17: The fact that the jurist spectates sulfisoxazole is true. sent18: something is starchless. sent19: the oca is both not a Trichodontidae and a torn. sent20: the fact that the sulfisoxazole spectates jurist is true. sent21: that the kingfisher is not starchless is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the oca does tear is correct.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the oca is a torn and it is starchless.; int1 -> int2: something is a torn and starchless.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the Pharisee is not a Trichodontidae is right.; __UNKNOWN__