there exists something such that if it is a submarine and does not impersonate aerator then it is not a nipple.
sent1: something is not a valerian if it is a kind of a Tapiridae and does complete. sent2: there exists something such that if it does narrow and it does not impersonate technocracy then it is not erythropoietic. sent3: there exists something such that if it unwraps WTO and is a Procaviidae it is not a kind of a fish-fly. sent4: if something is a kind of a submarine but it does not impersonate aerator then it is a kind of a nipple. sent5: something is not a nipple if it does submarine and it does impersonate aerator. sent6: if the attraction is a kind of a submarine and does not impersonate ozonosphere it does not incorporate. sent7: if a beat is not a phone it is hospitable. sent8: the fact that the ozonosphere is not the nipple if the ozonosphere is a submarine and it does impersonate aerator is right. sent9: there is something such that if it is a submarine and it impersonates aerator it is not a nipple. sent10: there exists something such that if it charcoals and is not an escort then it is not a anarthria. sent11: there is something such that if it is a submarine and does not impersonate aerator then it is a nipple. sent12: there is something such that if it impersonates attraction and is extramural then it does not unwrap main. sent13: if the ozonosphere does impersonate Caelum but it is not conclusive it is not a kind of a submarine. sent14: something is not a scallop if it impersonates deformity and does not impersonate technocracy. sent15: if the fact that the ozonosphere submarines and does not impersonate aerator is right then it is a kind of a nipple.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a submarine and does not impersonate aerator then it is not a nipple. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a valerian if it is a kind of a Tapiridae and does complete. sent2: there exists something such that if it does narrow and it does not impersonate technocracy then it is not erythropoietic. sent3: there exists something such that if it unwraps WTO and is a Procaviidae it is not a kind of a fish-fly. sent4: if something is a kind of a submarine but it does not impersonate aerator then it is a kind of a nipple. sent5: something is not a nipple if it does submarine and it does impersonate aerator. sent6: if the attraction is a kind of a submarine and does not impersonate ozonosphere it does not incorporate. sent7: if a beat is not a phone it is hospitable. sent8: the fact that the ozonosphere is not the nipple if the ozonosphere is a submarine and it does impersonate aerator is right. sent9: there is something such that if it is a submarine and it impersonates aerator it is not a nipple. sent10: there exists something such that if it charcoals and is not an escort then it is not a anarthria. sent11: there is something such that if it is a submarine and does not impersonate aerator then it is a nipple. sent12: there is something such that if it impersonates attraction and is extramural then it does not unwrap main. sent13: if the ozonosphere does impersonate Caelum but it is not conclusive it is not a kind of a submarine. sent14: something is not a scallop if it impersonates deformity and does not impersonate technocracy. sent15: if the fact that the ozonosphere submarines and does not impersonate aerator is right then it is a kind of a nipple. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__