the bystander is not photochemical.
sent1: the emptiness is both a jacksnipe and a bargain. sent2: the fibrinase is not a escalade. sent3: if the fact that the motley is not a promotion is not wrong then the bystander is non-positivist and/or photochemical. sent4: there is something such that it is not an agitation. sent5: that the motley is a positivist and pictorial is wrong. sent6: the endoscope does not escalade. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not priestly and is not a kind of a escalade is true is false then that the bystander is not photochemical hold. sent8: something is photochemical if it is not a positivist and/or is photochemical. sent9: the emptiness is creedal. sent10: that something does not hum yaws if that it is a kind of non-positivist thing that is a jird is incorrect is not incorrect. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a promotion that the motley is not a positivist but it is a jird is wrong. sent12: if the emptiness is creedal and it is a jacksnipe then the Olympian is not a kind of a frontbencher. sent13: the bystander is not a commandment if the fact that it is non-photochemical thing that is priestly does not hold. sent14: the bystander does not dunk emptiness. sent15: there exists something such that it is a promotion. sent16: if the catboat is not a kind of a pictorial then that the combatant is not priestly and it is not a kind of a escalade is not right. sent17: there exists something such that that it does not hum yaws and is photochemical is not true. sent18: the combatant is not a netball if the Olympian is not a frontbencher. sent19: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a pictorial the catboat shushes bandwagon and it is a kind of a commandment. sent20: the catboat is not a kind of a pictorial if a commandment shushes bandwagon. sent21: if something is not a netball then that it is not a escalade and it is priestly is incorrect. sent22: something does not hum doped if it is not a nonpartisan. sent23: the fact that the fact that the motley is a positivist and it is a jird is true does not hold. sent24: something is a kind of a commandment but it does not shush bandwagon if it does not hum yaws.
sent15 & sent11 -> int1: that the motley is not a positivist but it is a jird is not correct.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the motley is not a positivist but it is a jird is wrong it does not hum yaws.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the motley does not hum yaws.; sent24 -> int4: if the motley does not hum yaws it is a commandment and it does not shush bandwagon.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the motley is a commandment and does not shush bandwagon hold.; int5 -> int6: something is a commandment but it does not shush bandwagon.;
that the bystander is photochemical is true.
sent8 -> int7: if the bystander is not a positivist and/or it is photochemical it is photochemical.; sent21 -> int8: the fact that the combatant is not a escalade but priestly is not right if it is not a netball.; sent1 -> int9: the emptiness is a jacksnipe.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the emptiness is creedal and it is a jacksnipe.; sent12 & int10 -> int11: the Olympian is not a kind of a frontbencher.; sent18 & int11 -> int12: the combatant is not a netball.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the combatant is both not a escalade and priestly is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the bystander is not photochemical. ; $context$ = sent1: the emptiness is both a jacksnipe and a bargain. sent2: the fibrinase is not a escalade. sent3: if the fact that the motley is not a promotion is not wrong then the bystander is non-positivist and/or photochemical. sent4: there is something such that it is not an agitation. sent5: that the motley is a positivist and pictorial is wrong. sent6: the endoscope does not escalade. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not priestly and is not a kind of a escalade is true is false then that the bystander is not photochemical hold. sent8: something is photochemical if it is not a positivist and/or is photochemical. sent9: the emptiness is creedal. sent10: that something does not hum yaws if that it is a kind of non-positivist thing that is a jird is incorrect is not incorrect. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a promotion that the motley is not a positivist but it is a jird is wrong. sent12: if the emptiness is creedal and it is a jacksnipe then the Olympian is not a kind of a frontbencher. sent13: the bystander is not a commandment if the fact that it is non-photochemical thing that is priestly does not hold. sent14: the bystander does not dunk emptiness. sent15: there exists something such that it is a promotion. sent16: if the catboat is not a kind of a pictorial then that the combatant is not priestly and it is not a kind of a escalade is not right. sent17: there exists something such that that it does not hum yaws and is photochemical is not true. sent18: the combatant is not a netball if the Olympian is not a frontbencher. sent19: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a pictorial the catboat shushes bandwagon and it is a kind of a commandment. sent20: the catboat is not a kind of a pictorial if a commandment shushes bandwagon. sent21: if something is not a netball then that it is not a escalade and it is priestly is incorrect. sent22: something does not hum doped if it is not a nonpartisan. sent23: the fact that the fact that the motley is a positivist and it is a jird is true does not hold. sent24: something is a kind of a commandment but it does not shush bandwagon if it does not hum yaws. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent11 -> int1: that the motley is not a positivist but it is a jird is not correct.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the motley is not a positivist but it is a jird is wrong it does not hum yaws.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the motley does not hum yaws.; sent24 -> int4: if the motley does not hum yaws it is a commandment and it does not shush bandwagon.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the motley is a commandment and does not shush bandwagon hold.; int5 -> int6: something is a commandment but it does not shush bandwagon.; __UNKNOWN__