the slacker is a subdivider or it is Javanese or both.
sent1: if the Declomycin is non-completed then the fact that the noncombatant is not aeromechanic but it is non-completed does not hold. sent2: that if that the noncombatant is not aeromechanic but it does complete is false the Portuguese does jockey hold. sent3: if the red does rehabilitate Kent then the slacker is a Javanese. sent4: if something is a kind of non-missionary thing that is not a halloo then that the Declomycin is not completed is not incorrect. sent5: the iceboat is non-missionary but not a halloo.
sent5 -> int1: something is not a missionary and it is not a kind of a halloo.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Declomycin does not complete.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the noncombatant is both not aeromechanic and completed is false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Portuguese is a jockey.;
$hypothesis$ = the slacker is a subdivider or it is Javanese or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Declomycin is non-completed then the fact that the noncombatant is not aeromechanic but it is non-completed does not hold. sent2: that if that the noncombatant is not aeromechanic but it does complete is false the Portuguese does jockey hold. sent3: if the red does rehabilitate Kent then the slacker is a Javanese. sent4: if something is a kind of non-missionary thing that is not a halloo then that the Declomycin is not completed is not incorrect. sent5: the iceboat is non-missionary but not a halloo. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: something is not a missionary and it is not a kind of a halloo.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Declomycin does not complete.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the noncombatant is both not aeromechanic and completed is false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Portuguese is a jockey.; __UNKNOWN__