the nod does not occur if the ventilation occurs.
sent1: the argenticness does not occur. sent2: the asking agon occurs if that the abnegation does not occur and the mobilizing does not occur is not true. sent3: the simplification occurs. sent4: the aphrodisiac does not occur if both the burn and the commitment occurs. sent5: the casketing ibuprofen occurs and the asking whispered occurs. sent6: the fact that the asking estrone does not occur and the asking height does not occur is incorrect if the casketing ibuprofen does not occur. sent7: the epiphenomenon does not occur if the multiplying kris happens. sent8: that the deformation does not occur is caused by that both the sharp and the whispering occurs. sent9: that the leaching deliveryman does not occur is wrong. sent10: that the mercifulness does not occur but the Eurocentricness occurs does not hold. sent11: the anaerobicness happens. sent12: the pursuit and the combining occurs. sent13: that the ventilation does not occur is brought about by that the casketing ibuprofen occurs and the asking agon occurs. sent14: the fact that the fact that both the non-doctoralness and the transfusion occurs is not right is not false. sent15: the anabioticness occurs. sent16: the fact that the abnegation but not the mobilizing occurs is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the abnegation does not occur and the mobilizing does not occur is not correct.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the asking agon occurs is not wrong.; sent5 -> int2: the casketing ibuprofen occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the casketing ibuprofen and the asking agon happens.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the ventilation does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ventilation happens.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the abnegation does not occur and the mobilizing does not occur is true.;
that the asking estrone does not occur and the asking height does not occur does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the nod does not occur if the ventilation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the argenticness does not occur. sent2: the asking agon occurs if that the abnegation does not occur and the mobilizing does not occur is not true. sent3: the simplification occurs. sent4: the aphrodisiac does not occur if both the burn and the commitment occurs. sent5: the casketing ibuprofen occurs and the asking whispered occurs. sent6: the fact that the asking estrone does not occur and the asking height does not occur is incorrect if the casketing ibuprofen does not occur. sent7: the epiphenomenon does not occur if the multiplying kris happens. sent8: that the deformation does not occur is caused by that both the sharp and the whispering occurs. sent9: that the leaching deliveryman does not occur is wrong. sent10: that the mercifulness does not occur but the Eurocentricness occurs does not hold. sent11: the anaerobicness happens. sent12: the pursuit and the combining occurs. sent13: that the ventilation does not occur is brought about by that the casketing ibuprofen occurs and the asking agon occurs. sent14: the fact that the fact that both the non-doctoralness and the transfusion occurs is not right is not false. sent15: the anabioticness occurs. sent16: the fact that the abnegation but not the mobilizing occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the abnegation does not occur and the mobilizing does not occur is not correct.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the asking agon occurs is not wrong.; sent5 -> int2: the casketing ibuprofen occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the casketing ibuprofen and the asking agon happens.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the ventilation does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ventilation happens.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the abnegation does not occur and the mobilizing does not occur is true.; __UNKNOWN__