the senna is not Hebraic and does not lull Roget.
sent1: if the Friend is not forcipate then the senna is unclear and it lulls afterworld. sent2: the fact that the pikeblenny is not an impacted or preserves Labanotation or both is not true. sent3: that something is not ethical and/or is a multiprocessor is not right if it does not lull Roget. sent4: the senna is not Hebraic and does not lull Roget if the cryptogam does lull Roget. sent5: the cryptogam does not lull Roget and is not a kind of a multiprocessor if the senna is a kind of a multiprocessor. sent6: if that the fact that the cryptogam is Hebraic and/or it is unclear is right is not correct it lulls Roget. sent7: something is a vacuole if the fact that it is not a kind of a buckbean is not incorrect. sent8: the cryptogam is unclear if the fact that that it is not ethical or is a kind of a multiprocessor or both hold is not right. sent9: the senna is unclear. sent10: the fact that the asclepiad is not downtown or it is a kind of a generic or both is not true. sent11: if something does not preserve firewall then that it is generic is not incorrect. sent12: that that either the senna is not unclear or it is Hebraic or both hold is incorrect. sent13: that the smelt is a multiprocessor is true. sent14: that the cryptogam does not lull Roget and/or is a multiprocessor is false if it is not Hebraic. sent15: if the cryptogam does lull Roget then the senna is not Hebraic. sent16: the fact that the senna does not blemish federalism and/or is a Hollywood is not correct. sent17: the cryptogam is not unclear. sent18: that the cryptogam is not Hebraic or is a multiprocessor or both does not hold. sent19: the cryptogam is not unclear and is not ethical if the senna is ethical. sent20: that something is not forcipate and/or it is esophageal is incorrect if it is not a kind of a lectern.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the cryptogam is unethical and/or it is a multiprocessor is incorrect if that it does not lull Roget hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cryptogam does not lull Roget.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the cryptogam is not ethical or is a multiprocessor or both is not true.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the cryptogam is unclear.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cryptogam does lull Roget.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the senna is not Hebraic and does not lull Roget does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the senna is not Hebraic and does not lull Roget. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Friend is not forcipate then the senna is unclear and it lulls afterworld. sent2: the fact that the pikeblenny is not an impacted or preserves Labanotation or both is not true. sent3: that something is not ethical and/or is a multiprocessor is not right if it does not lull Roget. sent4: the senna is not Hebraic and does not lull Roget if the cryptogam does lull Roget. sent5: the cryptogam does not lull Roget and is not a kind of a multiprocessor if the senna is a kind of a multiprocessor. sent6: if that the fact that the cryptogam is Hebraic and/or it is unclear is right is not correct it lulls Roget. sent7: something is a vacuole if the fact that it is not a kind of a buckbean is not incorrect. sent8: the cryptogam is unclear if the fact that that it is not ethical or is a kind of a multiprocessor or both hold is not right. sent9: the senna is unclear. sent10: the fact that the asclepiad is not downtown or it is a kind of a generic or both is not true. sent11: if something does not preserve firewall then that it is generic is not incorrect. sent12: that that either the senna is not unclear or it is Hebraic or both hold is incorrect. sent13: that the smelt is a multiprocessor is true. sent14: that the cryptogam does not lull Roget and/or is a multiprocessor is false if it is not Hebraic. sent15: if the cryptogam does lull Roget then the senna is not Hebraic. sent16: the fact that the senna does not blemish federalism and/or is a Hollywood is not correct. sent17: the cryptogam is not unclear. sent18: that the cryptogam is not Hebraic or is a multiprocessor or both does not hold. sent19: the cryptogam is not unclear and is not ethical if the senna is ethical. sent20: that something is not forcipate and/or it is esophageal is incorrect if it is not a kind of a lectern. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the cryptogam is unethical and/or it is a multiprocessor is incorrect if that it does not lull Roget hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cryptogam does not lull Roget.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the cryptogam is not ethical or is a multiprocessor or both is not true.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the cryptogam is unclear.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cryptogam does lull Roget.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__