the fact that the cachou is a homograft is correct.
sent1: something that does not bead polemonium and is a Jefferson does not enslave Tetraodontidae. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the divider is not a Jefferson and it is not a kind of a Epiphany hold is wrong it is a Jefferson. sent3: something does bead Belmont and stresses if it is not passionless. sent4: the cachou does not bead polemonium. sent5: the fact that something is not a blemish but it is a tweet is not right if it is a taxability. sent6: the poke does tweet if that it does not tweet and does not bead polemonium is false. sent7: the divider is a taxability if the fact that it does bead Belmont is not incorrect. sent8: if that the divider does not bead polemonium but it is a Jefferson does not hold the poke is not peaceful. sent9: that the poke is not peaceful and not a tweet does not hold. sent10: if that something is not a blemish but a tweet is not true then it is not peaceful. sent11: if that the divider does not enslave Tetraodontidae is not false the fact that the cachou is not a kind of a homograft is true. sent12: the poke is not a homograft if the divider is a homograft. sent13: everything is not passionless. sent14: the poke is peaceful if the fact that it is not peaceful and is not a tweet is wrong. sent15: the fact that the divider is not a tweet and does enslave Tetraodontidae does not hold. sent16: if something that is not a homograft does enslave Tetraodontidae it does not tweet.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the divider does not bead polemonium but it is a kind of a Jefferson is incorrect.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the poke is unpeaceful is correct.; sent14 & sent9 -> int2: the poke is peaceful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the divider does not bead polemonium but it is a Jefferson.; sent1 -> int5: that the divider does not enslave Tetraodontidae is not false if it does not bead polemonium and it is a Jefferson.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the divider does not enslave Tetraodontidae.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the cachou is a homograft.
sent10 -> int7: the divider is not peaceful if that it does not blemish and does tweet does not hold.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that if the divider is a kind of the taxability then the fact that the divider does not blemish but it tweets is false is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int9: if the poke is not passionless the fact that it does bead Belmont and it is a stress is not wrong.; sent13 -> int10: the poke is not passionless.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the poke does bead Belmont and is a stress is true.; int11 -> int12: everything beads Belmont and stresses.; int12 -> int13: the divider beads Belmont and is a stress.; int13 -> int14: the divider does bead Belmont.; int14 & sent7 -> int15: the divider is a taxability.; int8 & int15 -> int16: that the divider is not a blemish and is a tweet does not hold.; int7 & int16 -> int17: the divider is not peaceful.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cachou is a homograft is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not bead polemonium and is a Jefferson does not enslave Tetraodontidae. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the divider is not a Jefferson and it is not a kind of a Epiphany hold is wrong it is a Jefferson. sent3: something does bead Belmont and stresses if it is not passionless. sent4: the cachou does not bead polemonium. sent5: the fact that something is not a blemish but it is a tweet is not right if it is a taxability. sent6: the poke does tweet if that it does not tweet and does not bead polemonium is false. sent7: the divider is a taxability if the fact that it does bead Belmont is not incorrect. sent8: if that the divider does not bead polemonium but it is a Jefferson does not hold the poke is not peaceful. sent9: that the poke is not peaceful and not a tweet does not hold. sent10: if that something is not a blemish but a tweet is not true then it is not peaceful. sent11: if that the divider does not enslave Tetraodontidae is not false the fact that the cachou is not a kind of a homograft is true. sent12: the poke is not a homograft if the divider is a homograft. sent13: everything is not passionless. sent14: the poke is peaceful if the fact that it is not peaceful and is not a tweet is wrong. sent15: the fact that the divider is not a tweet and does enslave Tetraodontidae does not hold. sent16: if something that is not a homograft does enslave Tetraodontidae it does not tweet. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the divider does not bead polemonium but it is a kind of a Jefferson is incorrect.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the poke is unpeaceful is correct.; sent14 & sent9 -> int2: the poke is peaceful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the divider does not bead polemonium but it is a Jefferson.; sent1 -> int5: that the divider does not enslave Tetraodontidae is not false if it does not bead polemonium and it is a Jefferson.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the divider does not enslave Tetraodontidae.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__