the pangolin is thoughtful.
sent1: the shill debriefs disassociation. sent2: that either something is punitive or it investigates atheist or both hold if it does not dehisce. sent3: the pangolin investigates atheist. sent4: the glyph is punitive if the shill does debrief disassociation. sent5: the glyph debriefs disassociation if a non-punitive thing does not investigate atheist. sent6: there exists something such that it is a repentance. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not investigate atheist is right. sent8: something does dehisce. sent9: if something that does not debrief disassociation is not punitive the shill is thoughtful. sent10: the glyph debriefs disassociation if something is not punitive and does investigate atheist. sent11: there exists something such that it does debrief disassociation. sent12: the glyph is not thoughtful if there is something such that it debriefs disassociation. sent13: if there is something such that it does dehisce then the shill is not punitive and does not investigate atheist. sent14: if that that something does not dehisce and it is not punitive hold does not hold it is not thoughtful. sent15: if there exists something such that it is punitive then the shill is not thoughtful and does not investigate atheist.
sent8 & sent13 -> int1: the shill is not punitive and it does not investigate atheist.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not punitive and does not investigate atheist is not wrong.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the glyph debriefs disassociation.;
the pangolin is not thoughtful.
sent14 -> int4: if that the pangolin does not dehisce and it is not punitive does not hold then that it is not thoughtful is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the pangolin is thoughtful. ; $context$ = sent1: the shill debriefs disassociation. sent2: that either something is punitive or it investigates atheist or both hold if it does not dehisce. sent3: the pangolin investigates atheist. sent4: the glyph is punitive if the shill does debrief disassociation. sent5: the glyph debriefs disassociation if a non-punitive thing does not investigate atheist. sent6: there exists something such that it is a repentance. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not investigate atheist is right. sent8: something does dehisce. sent9: if something that does not debrief disassociation is not punitive the shill is thoughtful. sent10: the glyph debriefs disassociation if something is not punitive and does investigate atheist. sent11: there exists something such that it does debrief disassociation. sent12: the glyph is not thoughtful if there is something such that it debriefs disassociation. sent13: if there is something such that it does dehisce then the shill is not punitive and does not investigate atheist. sent14: if that that something does not dehisce and it is not punitive hold does not hold it is not thoughtful. sent15: if there exists something such that it is punitive then the shill is not thoughtful and does not investigate atheist. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent13 -> int1: the shill is not punitive and it does not investigate atheist.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not punitive and does not investigate atheist is not wrong.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the glyph debriefs disassociation.; __UNKNOWN__