there is something such that if it is not electrostatic then the fact that it is a Nothofagus and does not aggrieve is not correct.
sent1: if the sundress is a snow then that it aggrieves and does not scald modeled does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a north then the fact that it does winkle and it does not geyser laureled is not correct. sent3: if the hypotensive is not electrostatic then the fact that it is a kind of a Nothofagus and it does not aggrieve is not correct. sent4: if the spearmint is not a kind of a giveaway then the fact that it is potential and it does aggrieve does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a paramilitary then the fact that it is a sander and it is a Yahweh is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the hypotensive is a Atlantic is right that it is electrostatic and it does not scald perseverance is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is mathematical the fact that it is cultural and it is not a maigre is incorrect. sent8: that the fact that the hypotensive is electrostatic but it is not attentive is not true is correct if it does not nestle. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a Caeciliidae then the fact that it bespangles strike and it is a verboseness is not right. sent10: if the hypotensive does not aggrieve then the fact that it is sincere and does bespangle strike does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is not electrostatic it is a Nothofagus and does not aggrieve. sent12: if something is not a Nothofagus then the fact that it is a hypsometer that does not bespangle virino is false. sent13: if the hypotensive is not a Celtic that the fact that it does destine lunchroom and is electrostatic is not incorrect is not true. sent14: that the dancing-master is a lasting and it does predict is not right if it is not a penitent. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not dominate then the fact that it is a besom and a gatepost is not correct.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the god is not a Nothofagus that it is a hypsometer and it does not bespangle virino is not right.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not electrostatic then the fact that it is a Nothofagus and does not aggrieve is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sundress is a snow then that it aggrieves and does not scald modeled does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a north then the fact that it does winkle and it does not geyser laureled is not correct. sent3: if the hypotensive is not electrostatic then the fact that it is a kind of a Nothofagus and it does not aggrieve is not correct. sent4: if the spearmint is not a kind of a giveaway then the fact that it is potential and it does aggrieve does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a paramilitary then the fact that it is a sander and it is a Yahweh is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the hypotensive is a Atlantic is right that it is electrostatic and it does not scald perseverance is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is mathematical the fact that it is cultural and it is not a maigre is incorrect. sent8: that the fact that the hypotensive is electrostatic but it is not attentive is not true is correct if it does not nestle. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a Caeciliidae then the fact that it bespangles strike and it is a verboseness is not right. sent10: if the hypotensive does not aggrieve then the fact that it is sincere and does bespangle strike does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is not electrostatic it is a Nothofagus and does not aggrieve. sent12: if something is not a Nothofagus then the fact that it is a hypsometer that does not bespangle virino is false. sent13: if the hypotensive is not a Celtic that the fact that it does destine lunchroom and is electrostatic is not incorrect is not true. sent14: that the dancing-master is a lasting and it does predict is not right if it is not a penitent. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not dominate then the fact that it is a besom and a gatepost is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__