the fact that there exists something such that if it is non-stabling and it is not a Cryptobranchidae it does not repine goosander is not true.
sent1: if something is not a dysphonia and does not enfranchise barricaded then it does not lean porch. sent2: the fact that the porch does not repine goosander is not wrong if it is a kind of non-stabling thing that is not a kind of a Cryptobranchidae. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a stabling and it is not a Cryptobranchidae it does repine goosander.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a dysphonia and does not enfranchise barricaded then that it does not lean porch is true.
sent1 -> int1: if the pedant is not a dysphonia and it does not enfranchise barricaded then the fact that it does not lean porch is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is non-stabling and it is not a Cryptobranchidae it does not repine goosander is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a dysphonia and does not enfranchise barricaded then it does not lean porch. sent2: the fact that the porch does not repine goosander is not wrong if it is a kind of non-stabling thing that is not a kind of a Cryptobranchidae. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a stabling and it is not a Cryptobranchidae it does repine goosander. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__