the expendableness happens and/or the transoceanicness does not occur.
sent1: if the ableism does not occur both the bacteriostaticness and the jumpstart occurs. sent2: the transoceanicness is prevented by that the ecclesiasticalness happens. sent3: if the khanate occurs and the nipping occurs then that the paper does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that both the syllogizing hindsight and the counterclockwiseness occurs does not hold. sent5: the transoceanicness does not occur if the fact that the compoundness and the non-ecclesiasticalness occurs is not correct. sent6: the revolution does not occur. sent7: either the expendableness happens or the transoceanicness occurs or both. sent8: that both the bucolicness and the postictalness happens is triggered by the non-numericalness. sent9: if the compensation does not occur then the khanate occurs. sent10: the resenting Welshman happens and the hovering happens. sent11: that the impiousness and the metalworking happens is wrong. sent12: that the syllogizing hindsight does not occur results in that the papering and the detente happens. sent13: the syllogizing hindsight does not occur if that the syllogizing hindsight and the counterclockwiseness occurs is not correct. sent14: that the papering does not occur and the nipping does not occur prevents that the khanate happens. sent15: the disqualification does not occur and/or the compensation does not occur. sent16: if the syllogizing hindsight does not occur then the detente occurs. sent17: the articulating Cuban does not occur. sent18: either the resenting vibist does not occur or the Best does not occur or both. sent19: that the resenting fatalism does not occur is not incorrect. sent20: if that the disqualification occurs is not false then that either the expendableness or the non-transoceanicness or both happens is not right. sent21: if that the nip does not occur is not false the fact that both the compound and the non-ecclesiasticalness happens does not hold. sent22: that both the ecclesiasticalness and the compound occurs is brought about by that the detente does not occur. sent23: the fact that the khanate happens is correct if the disqualification does not occur. sent24: the amygdalotomy occurs. sent25: if that both the hospice and the non-aftness occurs is false then the biting does not occur. sent26: if the fact that the ecclesiasticalness happens is right then the paper does not occur and the nip does not occur.
sent15 & sent23 & sent9 -> int1: the khanate occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the nipping occurs is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the khanate and the nip occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the papering does not occur.; sent13 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the syllogizing hindsight does not occur is not incorrect.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the papering and the detente happens.; int5 -> int6: the paper happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the nip does not occur.; int8 & sent21 -> int9: that the compoundness happens but the ecclesiasticalness does not occur is not true.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the transoceanicness does not occur.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the expendableness or the non-transoceanicness or both happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the expendableness happens and/or the transoceanicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ableism does not occur both the bacteriostaticness and the jumpstart occurs. sent2: the transoceanicness is prevented by that the ecclesiasticalness happens. sent3: if the khanate occurs and the nipping occurs then that the paper does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that both the syllogizing hindsight and the counterclockwiseness occurs does not hold. sent5: the transoceanicness does not occur if the fact that the compoundness and the non-ecclesiasticalness occurs is not correct. sent6: the revolution does not occur. sent7: either the expendableness happens or the transoceanicness occurs or both. sent8: that both the bucolicness and the postictalness happens is triggered by the non-numericalness. sent9: if the compensation does not occur then the khanate occurs. sent10: the resenting Welshman happens and the hovering happens. sent11: that the impiousness and the metalworking happens is wrong. sent12: that the syllogizing hindsight does not occur results in that the papering and the detente happens. sent13: the syllogizing hindsight does not occur if that the syllogizing hindsight and the counterclockwiseness occurs is not correct. sent14: that the papering does not occur and the nipping does not occur prevents that the khanate happens. sent15: the disqualification does not occur and/or the compensation does not occur. sent16: if the syllogizing hindsight does not occur then the detente occurs. sent17: the articulating Cuban does not occur. sent18: either the resenting vibist does not occur or the Best does not occur or both. sent19: that the resenting fatalism does not occur is not incorrect. sent20: if that the disqualification occurs is not false then that either the expendableness or the non-transoceanicness or both happens is not right. sent21: if that the nip does not occur is not false the fact that both the compound and the non-ecclesiasticalness happens does not hold. sent22: that both the ecclesiasticalness and the compound occurs is brought about by that the detente does not occur. sent23: the fact that the khanate happens is correct if the disqualification does not occur. sent24: the amygdalotomy occurs. sent25: if that both the hospice and the non-aftness occurs is false then the biting does not occur. sent26: if the fact that the ecclesiasticalness happens is right then the paper does not occur and the nip does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent23 & sent9 -> int1: the khanate occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the nipping occurs is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the khanate and the nip occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the papering does not occur.; sent13 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the syllogizing hindsight does not occur is not incorrect.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the papering and the detente happens.; int5 -> int6: the paper happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the nip does not occur.; int8 & sent21 -> int9: that the compoundness happens but the ecclesiasticalness does not occur is not true.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the transoceanicness does not occur.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__