the airstream is not a skysail.
sent1: the breadstick does not flesh Labridae and is not a stabilization. sent2: if the breadstick is a kind of a goldfish that does not flesh animator then the glutelin is not exoteric. sent3: if something is non-exoteric and is not a goldfish the glutelin does not flesh animator. sent4: the breadstick does not flesh animator and it is not a stabilization if the harpsichord is not a APC. sent5: if that something is not wheaten and it is not a skysail is not correct it is a skysail. sent6: the breadstick is not agricultural if it does shout and is wheaten. sent7: the glutelin does not chock copout. sent8: the airstream does not flesh animator if there is something such that it is not a skysail. sent9: if something is a kind of a goldfish and it is Bogartian then it is not a skysail. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not wheaten then the airstream is not exoteric. sent11: the breadstick is a goldfish but it does not flesh animator if it is a kind of a stabilization. sent12: the fact that something is not exoteric is correct. sent13: if something is not nontraditional it does chock copout and it is a APC. sent14: the breadstick does not stuff retake. sent15: there exists something such that it does not mythologize frill and/or it is not nontraditional. sent16: that if the glutelin is not exoteric that the airstream is non-wheaten and it is not a skysail is false is true. sent17: the fact that the breadstick does not flesh animator and it is not a stabilization is not correct if the glutelin does not flesh animator. sent18: the fact that the glutelin is not a stabilization is true. sent19: the harpsichord is not a APC. sent20: if the harpsichord is not a APC then the breadstick is not a kind of a stabilization. sent21: the harpsichord is a stabilization. sent22: something is not uneven. sent23: there exists something such that it is a stabilization. sent24: if the harpsichord is not exoteric then the airstream is not a skysail and not a APC. sent25: the airstream is Bogartian and does chock copout. sent26: something does not flesh harpsichord. sent27: the fact that the breadstick does not mythologize breadstick and it is not a kind of a heliotherapy is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airstream is not a kind of a goldfish.; sent4 & sent19 -> int1: the breadstick does not flesh animator and it is not a stabilization.; sent25 -> int2: the fact that the airstream is Bogartian hold.; sent9 -> int3: if the airstream is a goldfish and it is Bogartian it is not a skysail.;
the airstream is a kind of a skysail.
sent5 -> int4: the airstream is a skysail if the fact that it is not wheaten and not a skysail is not true.; sent13 -> int5: if the harpsichord is not nontraditional then it chocks copout and is a APC.;
$hypothesis$ = the airstream is not a skysail. ; $context$ = sent1: the breadstick does not flesh Labridae and is not a stabilization. sent2: if the breadstick is a kind of a goldfish that does not flesh animator then the glutelin is not exoteric. sent3: if something is non-exoteric and is not a goldfish the glutelin does not flesh animator. sent4: the breadstick does not flesh animator and it is not a stabilization if the harpsichord is not a APC. sent5: if that something is not wheaten and it is not a skysail is not correct it is a skysail. sent6: the breadstick is not agricultural if it does shout and is wheaten. sent7: the glutelin does not chock copout. sent8: the airstream does not flesh animator if there is something such that it is not a skysail. sent9: if something is a kind of a goldfish and it is Bogartian then it is not a skysail. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not wheaten then the airstream is not exoteric. sent11: the breadstick is a goldfish but it does not flesh animator if it is a kind of a stabilization. sent12: the fact that something is not exoteric is correct. sent13: if something is not nontraditional it does chock copout and it is a APC. sent14: the breadstick does not stuff retake. sent15: there exists something such that it does not mythologize frill and/or it is not nontraditional. sent16: that if the glutelin is not exoteric that the airstream is non-wheaten and it is not a skysail is false is true. sent17: the fact that the breadstick does not flesh animator and it is not a stabilization is not correct if the glutelin does not flesh animator. sent18: the fact that the glutelin is not a stabilization is true. sent19: the harpsichord is not a APC. sent20: if the harpsichord is not a APC then the breadstick is not a kind of a stabilization. sent21: the harpsichord is a stabilization. sent22: something is not uneven. sent23: there exists something such that it is a stabilization. sent24: if the harpsichord is not exoteric then the airstream is not a skysail and not a APC. sent25: the airstream is Bogartian and does chock copout. sent26: something does not flesh harpsichord. sent27: the fact that the breadstick does not mythologize breadstick and it is not a kind of a heliotherapy is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the airstream is not a kind of a goldfish.; sent4 & sent19 -> int1: the breadstick does not flesh animator and it is not a stabilization.; sent25 -> int2: the fact that the airstream is Bogartian hold.; sent9 -> int3: if the airstream is a goldfish and it is Bogartian it is not a skysail.; __UNKNOWN__