there is something such that if it lobs brocket that it does not heap roisterer and is nonrepetitive does not hold.
sent1: if something lobs brocket that it is not a glossy and it is fitter is wrong. sent2: if the devisee is unequivocal then it is not a Saroyan and it does heap roisterer. sent3: if the devisee does lob brocket the fact that it does not heap roisterer and it is nonrepetitive is not true. sent4: there exists something such that if it lobs brocket it does not heap roisterer and is nonrepetitive. sent5: if the AA is chemoreceptive the fact that it is both not a ransom and nonrepetitive does not hold. sent6: if the devisee is a Saroyan the fact that it is not a skinner but a Gropius is not correct. sent7: if the devisee lobs brocket it does not heap roisterer and it is nonrepetitive. sent8: if the devisee lobs brocket then the fact that it heaps roisterer and is nonrepetitive is not true. sent9: there is something such that if it does double that it is not a misdeal and it does criticize butcherbird is not right. sent10: there is something such that if it does lob dossal the fact that it is amylolytic and it is a verbiage is false. sent11: the fact that the devisee criticizes Orbison and is an anchorage is false if it is nonrepetitive. sent12: there exists something such that if it lobs brocket the fact that it does heap roisterer and is nonrepetitive is not true.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the thick-knee is not a glossy but fitter is not true if it lobs brocket.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it lobs brocket that it does not heap roisterer and is nonrepetitive does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something lobs brocket that it is not a glossy and it is fitter is wrong. sent2: if the devisee is unequivocal then it is not a Saroyan and it does heap roisterer. sent3: if the devisee does lob brocket the fact that it does not heap roisterer and it is nonrepetitive is not true. sent4: there exists something such that if it lobs brocket it does not heap roisterer and is nonrepetitive. sent5: if the AA is chemoreceptive the fact that it is both not a ransom and nonrepetitive does not hold. sent6: if the devisee is a Saroyan the fact that it is not a skinner but a Gropius is not correct. sent7: if the devisee lobs brocket it does not heap roisterer and it is nonrepetitive. sent8: if the devisee lobs brocket then the fact that it heaps roisterer and is nonrepetitive is not true. sent9: there is something such that if it does double that it is not a misdeal and it does criticize butcherbird is not right. sent10: there is something such that if it does lob dossal the fact that it is amylolytic and it is a verbiage is false. sent11: the fact that the devisee criticizes Orbison and is an anchorage is false if it is nonrepetitive. sent12: there exists something such that if it lobs brocket the fact that it does heap roisterer and is nonrepetitive is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__