the fact that there is something such that if it is not coreferential then it is not unbroken and it distrains is not true.
sent1: if the coontie stabs unanimity then it is not unbroken and condemns bushel. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Rachmaninoff then it does not stab Faraday and it surpasses. sent3: if something is a scrotum it does not condemn Flagstaff and is a kind of a morphology. sent4: there is something such that if it is not yeasty it is a medalist and does stab theodicy. sent5: something distrains if it is not coreferential. sent6: something is not unbroken but it distrains if that it is not coreferential is right. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not yeasty then it is not a kind of a span and gilds putrefaction. sent8: the criollo does not gild Purus but it gorges if it is not unbroken. sent9: that if something is not coreferential it is unbroken and does distrain hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not deep it is apsidal thing that does gild cavity. sent11: there is something such that if it does not gild nearside it is a kind of a Rachmaninoff that is an inexperience. sent12: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not unbroken it is not flimsy but a brassard. sent13: there is something such that if it is a morphology then it does not anticipate and gilds overexertion. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not limacine then it condemns cross-question and does gorge. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not surpass then it is not a gorge and it is a kind of a Trotskyism. sent16: if the coontie is non-eyeless then it is unbroken thing that tinkles.
sent6 -> int1: if the coontie is non-coreferential it is not unbroken and it does distrain.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not coreferential then it is not unbroken and it distrains is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the coontie stabs unanimity then it is not unbroken and condemns bushel. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Rachmaninoff then it does not stab Faraday and it surpasses. sent3: if something is a scrotum it does not condemn Flagstaff and is a kind of a morphology. sent4: there is something such that if it is not yeasty it is a medalist and does stab theodicy. sent5: something distrains if it is not coreferential. sent6: something is not unbroken but it distrains if that it is not coreferential is right. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not yeasty then it is not a kind of a span and gilds putrefaction. sent8: the criollo does not gild Purus but it gorges if it is not unbroken. sent9: that if something is not coreferential it is unbroken and does distrain hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not deep it is apsidal thing that does gild cavity. sent11: there is something such that if it does not gild nearside it is a kind of a Rachmaninoff that is an inexperience. sent12: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not unbroken it is not flimsy but a brassard. sent13: there is something such that if it is a morphology then it does not anticipate and gilds overexertion. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not limacine then it condemns cross-question and does gorge. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not surpass then it is not a gorge and it is a kind of a Trotskyism. sent16: if the coontie is non-eyeless then it is unbroken thing that tinkles. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the coontie is non-coreferential it is not unbroken and it does distrain.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__