that the griffon does not wobble sarcoplasm and it is not persuasive is incorrect.
sent1: the sycamore is micropylar. sent2: the griffon is not a Kuomintang if that it is both a Kuomintang and a Fornax is not right. sent3: if something is a piroxicam it does not wobble sarcoplasm and it is not persuasive. sent4: the griffon is not autoimmune. sent5: the sycamore does not abate. sent6: if the griffon is not a duckboard and does not tighten then it is a Fornax. sent7: the snowfield is non-persuasive. sent8: that the griffon does not wobble sarcoplasm and is persuasive is false. sent9: if something is a kind of an asteroid then it is a Clotho and it does not abate. sent10: the sycamore is an asteroid. sent11: that the fact that the griffon is a kind of a Kuomintang and it is a Fornax is not wrong does not hold. sent12: if the fact that the griffon does not wobble sarcoplasm and it is not persuasive hold it is a kind of a Kuomintang. sent13: if the fact that the mainsail does not abate is not incorrect the fact that the griffon is micropylar and a Kuomintang is false. sent14: that the busbar is not a kind of a Fornax hold. sent15: the mainsail does not abate if the sycamore is a Clotho but it does not abate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the griffon does not wobble sarcoplasm and is not persuasive.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the griffon is a Kuomintang.; sent2 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the griffon is not a Kuomintang is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Town is not a Fornax.
sent9 -> int4: the sycamore is a kind of a Clotho that does not abate if it is a kind of an asteroid.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the sycamore is a Clotho and does not abate.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the mainsail does not abate.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the griffon is micropylar and it is a Kuomintang is false.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a kind of micropylar a Kuomintang is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the griffon does not wobble sarcoplasm and it is not persuasive is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the sycamore is micropylar. sent2: the griffon is not a Kuomintang if that it is both a Kuomintang and a Fornax is not right. sent3: if something is a piroxicam it does not wobble sarcoplasm and it is not persuasive. sent4: the griffon is not autoimmune. sent5: the sycamore does not abate. sent6: if the griffon is not a duckboard and does not tighten then it is a Fornax. sent7: the snowfield is non-persuasive. sent8: that the griffon does not wobble sarcoplasm and is persuasive is false. sent9: if something is a kind of an asteroid then it is a Clotho and it does not abate. sent10: the sycamore is an asteroid. sent11: that the fact that the griffon is a kind of a Kuomintang and it is a Fornax is not wrong does not hold. sent12: if the fact that the griffon does not wobble sarcoplasm and it is not persuasive hold it is a kind of a Kuomintang. sent13: if the fact that the mainsail does not abate is not incorrect the fact that the griffon is micropylar and a Kuomintang is false. sent14: that the busbar is not a kind of a Fornax hold. sent15: the mainsail does not abate if the sycamore is a Clotho but it does not abate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the griffon does not wobble sarcoplasm and is not persuasive.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the griffon is a Kuomintang.; sent2 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the griffon is not a Kuomintang is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__