the bellarmine pecks combustible but it does not peck clanger.
sent1: that the bellarmine does peck combustible but it does not peck clanger is not correct if the pilocarpine is not focal. sent2: the fact that the webfoot deaminates blacklist and it deaminates epigraphy is not correct. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is a statue and it is a fold is wrong. sent4: The combustible pecks bellarmine. sent5: something does not deaminate blacklist but it deaminates epigraphy. sent6: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it deaminates blacklist and it deaminates epigraphy is correct is not correct. sent7: the pilocarpine is focal if there is something such that it is not a statue. sent8: the headcheese does regenerate. sent9: something is a statue that does not fold. sent10: that the bellarmine does deaminate giant if the giant does not skimp and is aversive is correct. sent11: the bellarmine is a date if something does deaminate blacklist. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a statue and it is not a kind of a fold is not true. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is a statue and it is not a fold is incorrect the pilocarpine is focal. sent14: the pilocarpine does not own pilocarpine if it is a cork and is focal. sent15: the giant does not skimp but it is aversive. sent16: if the pilocarpine does not own pilocarpine then the fact that the webfoot does deaminate blacklist and deaminates epigraphy does not hold. sent17: the bellarmine pecks combustible. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that it does not deaminate blacklist and does deaminate epigraphy is not right then the bellarmine is a date. sent19: something does not peck clanger if it does date and it does deaminate giant. sent20: if the fact that the pilocarpine does not own pilocarpine hold then the fact that the webfoot does not deaminate blacklist but it does deaminate epigraphy does not hold.
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: that the pilocarpine is focal hold.; sent10 & sent15 -> int2: that the bellarmine deaminates giant is true.; sent19 -> int3: if the bellarmine is a date and deaminates giant it does not peck clanger.;
that the bellarmine pecks combustible but it does not peck clanger is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the bellarmine pecks combustible but it does not peck clanger. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bellarmine does peck combustible but it does not peck clanger is not correct if the pilocarpine is not focal. sent2: the fact that the webfoot deaminates blacklist and it deaminates epigraphy is not correct. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is a statue and it is a fold is wrong. sent4: The combustible pecks bellarmine. sent5: something does not deaminate blacklist but it deaminates epigraphy. sent6: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it deaminates blacklist and it deaminates epigraphy is correct is not correct. sent7: the pilocarpine is focal if there is something such that it is not a statue. sent8: the headcheese does regenerate. sent9: something is a statue that does not fold. sent10: that the bellarmine does deaminate giant if the giant does not skimp and is aversive is correct. sent11: the bellarmine is a date if something does deaminate blacklist. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a statue and it is not a kind of a fold is not true. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is a statue and it is not a fold is incorrect the pilocarpine is focal. sent14: the pilocarpine does not own pilocarpine if it is a cork and is focal. sent15: the giant does not skimp but it is aversive. sent16: if the pilocarpine does not own pilocarpine then the fact that the webfoot does deaminate blacklist and deaminates epigraphy does not hold. sent17: the bellarmine pecks combustible. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that it does not deaminate blacklist and does deaminate epigraphy is not right then the bellarmine is a date. sent19: something does not peck clanger if it does date and it does deaminate giant. sent20: if the fact that the pilocarpine does not own pilocarpine hold then the fact that the webfoot does not deaminate blacklist but it does deaminate epigraphy does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: that the pilocarpine is focal hold.; sent10 & sent15 -> int2: that the bellarmine deaminates giant is true.; sent19 -> int3: if the bellarmine is a date and deaminates giant it does not peck clanger.; __UNKNOWN__