the fact that if the fireball is a breakdown then the la does not cohere cryptogam and is a pomology is not right.
sent1: if there is something such that that it is mini and does heft dower does not hold the fireball is a breakdown. sent2: the fact that something is mini and does heft dower is not correct if it is non-appellate. sent3: if the standee is not a kind of a pomology then the la is not a breakdown and/or does not cohere cryptogam. sent4: if the poorwill does not excel hollyhock then the fact that it does zero and it is a cantillation is false. sent5: the fact that the cryptogam coheres vigil and is mini does not hold. sent6: if the la is not a breakdown then the fireball is appellate and is not a kind of a leeward. sent7: the fact that the la does not cohere cryptogam is not false. sent8: if the fireball is a breakdown then the la does not cohere cryptogam. sent9: the la is not a breakdown. sent10: that the toupee is not a kind of a leeward if the fireball is appellate but it is not a leeward hold. sent11: the fireball is not a kind of a breakdown if that there is something such that it does not heft dower is true. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is a Hun and it is rhetorical does not hold. sent13: the la does not cohere cryptogam and is a pomology if that the methaqualone is appellate is correct. sent14: if there is something such that that it is mini and it hefts dower is not correct the fireball is not a breakdown. sent15: there exists something such that it is mini thing that does heft dower. sent16: if the methaqualone is appellate the la does not cohere cryptogam. sent17: that the methaqualone coheres subcompact and is a Cercopidae is not correct. sent18: if something either is not a kind of a breakdown or does not cohere cryptogam or both it is not a breakdown.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fireball is a kind of a breakdown.; sent2 -> int1: the fact that the methaqualone is mini and hefts dower is not right if it is not appellate.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the methaqualone is not appellate.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the methaqualone is mini and does heft dower is not true.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is mini and it hefts dower is false.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fireball is not a breakdown.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the methaqualone is appellate.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the la does not cohere cryptogam and is a kind of a pomology.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the toupee is not a leeward.
sent18 -> int8: the la is not a breakdown if it is not a breakdown and/or it does not cohere cryptogam.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fireball is a breakdown then the la does not cohere cryptogam and is a pomology is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is mini and does heft dower does not hold the fireball is a breakdown. sent2: the fact that something is mini and does heft dower is not correct if it is non-appellate. sent3: if the standee is not a kind of a pomology then the la is not a breakdown and/or does not cohere cryptogam. sent4: if the poorwill does not excel hollyhock then the fact that it does zero and it is a cantillation is false. sent5: the fact that the cryptogam coheres vigil and is mini does not hold. sent6: if the la is not a breakdown then the fireball is appellate and is not a kind of a leeward. sent7: the fact that the la does not cohere cryptogam is not false. sent8: if the fireball is a breakdown then the la does not cohere cryptogam. sent9: the la is not a breakdown. sent10: that the toupee is not a kind of a leeward if the fireball is appellate but it is not a leeward hold. sent11: the fireball is not a kind of a breakdown if that there is something such that it does not heft dower is true. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is a Hun and it is rhetorical does not hold. sent13: the la does not cohere cryptogam and is a pomology if that the methaqualone is appellate is correct. sent14: if there is something such that that it is mini and it hefts dower is not correct the fireball is not a breakdown. sent15: there exists something such that it is mini thing that does heft dower. sent16: if the methaqualone is appellate the la does not cohere cryptogam. sent17: that the methaqualone coheres subcompact and is a Cercopidae is not correct. sent18: if something either is not a kind of a breakdown or does not cohere cryptogam or both it is not a breakdown. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fireball is a kind of a breakdown.; sent2 -> int1: the fact that the methaqualone is mini and hefts dower is not right if it is not appellate.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the methaqualone is not appellate.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the methaqualone is mini and does heft dower is not true.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is mini and it hefts dower is false.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fireball is not a breakdown.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the methaqualone is appellate.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the la does not cohere cryptogam and is a kind of a pomology.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__