the fact that there exists something such that that it is non-autoimmune and it does not organize Viverridae is not wrong is false.
sent1: that the novel does not mismanage luncher and does enhance is incorrect. sent2: if that the Freemason is not autoimmune and it does not organize Viverridae does not hold the busbar is achlorhydric. sent3: that the busbar is not achlorhydric is not false if the fact that the fact that the novel does not mismanage luncher but it enhances is not right is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Freemason is not autoimmune and it does not organize Viverridae is wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the busbar is achlorhydric.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: the busbar is not achlorhydric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Freemason is non-autoimmune thing that does not organize Viverridae.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it is non-autoimmune and it does not organize Viverridae is not wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the novel does not mismanage luncher and does enhance is incorrect. sent2: if that the Freemason is not autoimmune and it does not organize Viverridae does not hold the busbar is achlorhydric. sent3: that the busbar is not achlorhydric is not false if the fact that the fact that the novel does not mismanage luncher but it enhances is not right is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Freemason is not autoimmune and it does not organize Viverridae is wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the busbar is achlorhydric.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: the busbar is not achlorhydric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Freemason is non-autoimmune thing that does not organize Viverridae.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__