the gentile does not program compatriot.
sent1: the Cage does bottleneck. sent2: the arquebus carols network. sent3: if something is a bottleneck then it does not program compatriot. sent4: if something is not exoteric then the fact that it does not carol hob and is onshore is wrong. sent5: if the fact that something does not carol network and it is not chaetal is incorrect it is a kind of a pit. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a forte. sent7: if the immunologist does perambulate the gentile stacks. sent8: the fact that something pits hold if that it does carol network is right. sent9: if something is a dent that it programs compatriot hold. sent10: the capybara is not exoteric if that the elver is a kind of exoteric a forte is not right. sent11: the collectivist does perambulate. sent12: that the upholder is not on-site and is not bivariate is not correct. sent13: if the collectivist is not a kind of a stack then the fact that the Cage does not perambulate is not false. sent14: if there exists something such that that it does not carol hob and is onshore is not true then that the immunologist is a dent is not incorrect. sent15: that the collectivist does carol network and is not chaetal is wrong. sent16: if something stacks it is a dent. sent17: the gentile does bottleneck and it pits if the fact that the Cage does not perambulate is not false. sent18: something is not a kind of a stack if that it is a kind of a Noruz and is a stack is wrong. sent19: if the collectivist is a kind of a pit the immunologist perambulates. sent20: that the elver is a kind of exoteric a forte is false if there is something such that it is not a forte. sent21: if the Cage is a bottleneck then the fact that the collectivist does not carol network and it is not chaetal is incorrect.
sent21 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the collectivist does not carol network and is not chaetal does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the collectivist does not carol network and is not chaetal is false then that it is a pit is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the collectivist is a pit.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the immunologist perambulates.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the gentile is a kind of a stack.; sent16 -> int6: if the gentile stacks it is a dent.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the gentile is a dent.; sent9 -> int8: the gentile programs compatriot if the fact that it is a kind of a dent is not false.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the gentile does not program compatriot.
sent3 -> int9: if the gentile bottlenecks it does not program compatriot.; sent18 -> int10: the collectivist does not stack if the fact that it is a Noruz and it is a stack does not hold.; sent4 -> int11: the fact that the capybara does not carol hob and is onshore is not right if it is not exoteric.; sent6 & sent20 -> int12: the fact that the elver is exoteric and it is a forte is not right.; sent10 & int12 -> int13: the capybara is not exoteric.; int11 & int13 -> int14: that the capybara does not carol hob and is onshore is not right.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that that it does not carol hob and it is onshore is not wrong is not true.; int15 & sent14 -> int16: the immunologist is a dent.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is a dent.;
$hypothesis$ = the gentile does not program compatriot. ; $context$ = sent1: the Cage does bottleneck. sent2: the arquebus carols network. sent3: if something is a bottleneck then it does not program compatriot. sent4: if something is not exoteric then the fact that it does not carol hob and is onshore is wrong. sent5: if the fact that something does not carol network and it is not chaetal is incorrect it is a kind of a pit. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a forte. sent7: if the immunologist does perambulate the gentile stacks. sent8: the fact that something pits hold if that it does carol network is right. sent9: if something is a dent that it programs compatriot hold. sent10: the capybara is not exoteric if that the elver is a kind of exoteric a forte is not right. sent11: the collectivist does perambulate. sent12: that the upholder is not on-site and is not bivariate is not correct. sent13: if the collectivist is not a kind of a stack then the fact that the Cage does not perambulate is not false. sent14: if there exists something such that that it does not carol hob and is onshore is not true then that the immunologist is a dent is not incorrect. sent15: that the collectivist does carol network and is not chaetal is wrong. sent16: if something stacks it is a dent. sent17: the gentile does bottleneck and it pits if the fact that the Cage does not perambulate is not false. sent18: something is not a kind of a stack if that it is a kind of a Noruz and is a stack is wrong. sent19: if the collectivist is a kind of a pit the immunologist perambulates. sent20: that the elver is a kind of exoteric a forte is false if there is something such that it is not a forte. sent21: if the Cage is a bottleneck then the fact that the collectivist does not carol network and it is not chaetal is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the collectivist does not carol network and is not chaetal does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the collectivist does not carol network and is not chaetal is false then that it is a pit is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the collectivist is a pit.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the immunologist perambulates.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the gentile is a kind of a stack.; sent16 -> int6: if the gentile stacks it is a dent.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the gentile is a dent.; sent9 -> int8: the gentile programs compatriot if the fact that it is a kind of a dent is not false.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__