the sucker does even sucker.
sent1: the fact that something is a cryobiology and bears ignorantness is not wrong if it does not houseclean inhalation. sent2: the porch does not houseclean inhalation if that it is not a victor or is not a sucker or both is incorrect. sent3: the porch is a kind of a sucker. sent4: if the underboss does bear ignorantness the fact that the broth is not a cryobiology is correct. sent5: something is not a oviraptorid if the fact that it is not supernal and/or is not a victor is false. sent6: the magneto is not a nones. sent7: the fact that the Egyptologist is a shag is not false. sent8: the sucker evens sucker if the deskman does evens sucker. sent9: that the sucker does bear diplodocus and does sibilate does not hold. sent10: the deskman is a kind of a Lari if the fact that the porch shags or it is not a Lari or both is not right. sent11: the fact that if something is not a sucker then it is not a kind of a victor is not false. sent12: if something is not clinker-built the fact that either it is a shag or it is not a Lari or both is incorrect. sent13: something housecleans inhalation if it is not a kind of a victor. sent14: if the fact that something does bear diplodocus and does not sibilate is incorrect it does not even sucker. sent15: if the sucker does bear diplodocus but it does not sibilate it is not clinker-built. sent16: the underboss bears ignorantness if the sap does houseclean inhalation. sent17: that the deskman is both not a shag and a Lari is not correct if the sucker is not clinker-built. sent18: that the porch is not a victor and/or it is not a sucker does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the magneto is both a sucker and not a wort is false the sap is not a sucker. sent20: if the magneto is not a nones that it is a sucker and not a wort is wrong. sent21: that the deskman is not a Lari is not false if that it bears ignorantness and/or it does not bear diplodocus is wrong. sent22: if the fact that the deskman does not shag and is a kind of a Lari is not right then the porch is not a kind of a cryobiology.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sucker bears diplodocus but it does not sibilate.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the sucker is not clinker-built.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: that the deskman is not a kind of a shag and is a Lari does not hold.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the porch is not a cryobiology.; sent1 -> int4: if the porch does not houseclean inhalation then it is a cryobiology and it does bear ignorantness.; sent2 & sent18 -> int5: the porch does not houseclean inhalation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the porch is a cryobiology and does bear ignorantness.; int6 -> int7: the porch is a cryobiology.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the sucker does bear diplodocus and does not sibilate does not hold.; sent14 -> int10: the sucker does not even sucker if the fact that it does bear diplodocus and does not sibilate is not correct.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the sucker evens sucker is right.
sent12 -> int11: if the porch is not clinker-built that that it is either a shag or not a Lari or both hold does not hold.; sent13 -> int12: the sap housecleans inhalation if it is not a victor.; sent11 -> int13: if the sap is not a sucker it is not a victor.; sent20 & sent6 -> int14: the fact that the magneto is a sucker but it is not a kind of a wort is not right.; sent19 & int14 -> int15: the sap is not a sucker.; int13 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the sap is not a kind of a victor is true.; int12 & int16 -> int17: the sap housecleans inhalation.; sent16 & int17 -> int18: the underboss does bear ignorantness.; sent4 & int18 -> int19: the broth is not a cryobiology.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it is not a cryobiology.;
$hypothesis$ = the sucker does even sucker. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a cryobiology and bears ignorantness is not wrong if it does not houseclean inhalation. sent2: the porch does not houseclean inhalation if that it is not a victor or is not a sucker or both is incorrect. sent3: the porch is a kind of a sucker. sent4: if the underboss does bear ignorantness the fact that the broth is not a cryobiology is correct. sent5: something is not a oviraptorid if the fact that it is not supernal and/or is not a victor is false. sent6: the magneto is not a nones. sent7: the fact that the Egyptologist is a shag is not false. sent8: the sucker evens sucker if the deskman does evens sucker. sent9: that the sucker does bear diplodocus and does sibilate does not hold. sent10: the deskman is a kind of a Lari if the fact that the porch shags or it is not a Lari or both is not right. sent11: the fact that if something is not a sucker then it is not a kind of a victor is not false. sent12: if something is not clinker-built the fact that either it is a shag or it is not a Lari or both is incorrect. sent13: something housecleans inhalation if it is not a kind of a victor. sent14: if the fact that something does bear diplodocus and does not sibilate is incorrect it does not even sucker. sent15: if the sucker does bear diplodocus but it does not sibilate it is not clinker-built. sent16: the underboss bears ignorantness if the sap does houseclean inhalation. sent17: that the deskman is both not a shag and a Lari is not correct if the sucker is not clinker-built. sent18: that the porch is not a victor and/or it is not a sucker does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the magneto is both a sucker and not a wort is false the sap is not a sucker. sent20: if the magneto is not a nones that it is a sucker and not a wort is wrong. sent21: that the deskman is not a Lari is not false if that it bears ignorantness and/or it does not bear diplodocus is wrong. sent22: if the fact that the deskman does not shag and is a kind of a Lari is not right then the porch is not a kind of a cryobiology. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sucker bears diplodocus but it does not sibilate.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the sucker is not clinker-built.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: that the deskman is not a kind of a shag and is a Lari does not hold.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the porch is not a cryobiology.; sent1 -> int4: if the porch does not houseclean inhalation then it is a cryobiology and it does bear ignorantness.; sent2 & sent18 -> int5: the porch does not houseclean inhalation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the porch is a cryobiology and does bear ignorantness.; int6 -> int7: the porch is a cryobiology.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the sucker does bear diplodocus and does not sibilate does not hold.; sent14 -> int10: the sucker does not even sucker if the fact that it does bear diplodocus and does not sibilate is not correct.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__