there exists something such that if that it abdicates seminarian or it is not technological or both is false then it is a easiness.
sent1: if the fact that something is out or not a firm or both is not correct it is commensal. sent2: if the fact that the tidemark abdicates seminarian or it is not technological or both is wrong it is a kind of a easiness. sent3: if the fact that the tidemark does abdicate seminarian and/or it is technological does not hold then it is a kind of a easiness. sent4: there exists something such that if that either it does abdicate seminarian or it is technological or both is incorrect it is a easiness. sent5: if the fact that either something abdicates seminarian or it is not uric or both is not true it is a monotony. sent6: if the fact that either the tidemark is a anteriority or it is not technological or both does not hold it is a pyrostat. sent7: if the fact that the tidemark abdicates seminarian or is not technological or both is not wrong then that it is a easiness is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if that it either is cherty or does not splutter Pelagianism or both is not right then it is downstage.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if that the lizardfish does abdicate seminarian or it is not uric or both does not hold then it is a monotony.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it abdicates seminarian or it is not technological or both is false then it is a easiness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is out or not a firm or both is not correct it is commensal. sent2: if the fact that the tidemark abdicates seminarian or it is not technological or both is wrong it is a kind of a easiness. sent3: if the fact that the tidemark does abdicate seminarian and/or it is technological does not hold then it is a kind of a easiness. sent4: there exists something such that if that either it does abdicate seminarian or it is technological or both is incorrect it is a easiness. sent5: if the fact that either something abdicates seminarian or it is not uric or both is not true it is a monotony. sent6: if the fact that either the tidemark is a anteriority or it is not technological or both does not hold it is a pyrostat. sent7: if the fact that the tidemark abdicates seminarian or is not technological or both is not wrong then that it is a easiness is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if that it either is cherty or does not splutter Pelagianism or both is not right then it is downstage. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__