the frying occurs.
sent1: if the palatableness occurs the rectification but not the tanning happens. sent2: the waving does not occur but the chaffiness happens if the fearing Creation does not occur. sent3: if the rectification but not the tanning occurs then the fearing bonanza happens. sent4: if the fearing pavage does not occur then the fact that the shading does not occur and the TPN does not occur is not right. sent5: that the wave does not occur and the chaffiness happens prevents that the gladdening Trumbull happens. sent6: that both the visibleness and the shading happens brings about that the frying does not occur. sent7: the repairing Esselen happens and the palatableness happens. sent8: the fearing Creation does not occur. sent9: the fact that the fearing pavage does not occur is not wrong. sent10: that the visibleness does not occur is prevented by that not the gladdening Trumbull but the fearing bonanza happens. sent11: if that the shading does not occur and the TPN does not occur is wrong then the shading occurs.
sent7 -> int1: the palatableness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the rectification but not the tanning occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fearing bonanza occurs.; sent2 & sent8 -> int4: the waving does not occur but the chaffiness happens.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the gladdening Trumbull does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the gladdening Trumbull does not occur and the fearing bonanza happens.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the visibleness happens.; sent4 & sent9 -> int8: that the shading does not occur and the TPN does not occur is wrong.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the shading happens.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the visibleness and the shading happens.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the frying occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the palatableness occurs the rectification but not the tanning happens. sent2: the waving does not occur but the chaffiness happens if the fearing Creation does not occur. sent3: if the rectification but not the tanning occurs then the fearing bonanza happens. sent4: if the fearing pavage does not occur then the fact that the shading does not occur and the TPN does not occur is not right. sent5: that the wave does not occur and the chaffiness happens prevents that the gladdening Trumbull happens. sent6: that both the visibleness and the shading happens brings about that the frying does not occur. sent7: the repairing Esselen happens and the palatableness happens. sent8: the fearing Creation does not occur. sent9: the fact that the fearing pavage does not occur is not wrong. sent10: that the visibleness does not occur is prevented by that not the gladdening Trumbull but the fearing bonanza happens. sent11: if that the shading does not occur and the TPN does not occur is wrong then the shading occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the palatableness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the rectification but not the tanning occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fearing bonanza occurs.; sent2 & sent8 -> int4: the waving does not occur but the chaffiness happens.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the gladdening Trumbull does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the gladdening Trumbull does not occur and the fearing bonanza happens.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the visibleness happens.; sent4 & sent9 -> int8: that the shading does not occur and the TPN does not occur is wrong.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the shading happens.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the visibleness and the shading happens.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__