the fact that that the staccatoness occurs causes that the undressing ramie does not occur or that the daciticness does not occur or both is incorrect.
sent1: both the transparency and the non-meatiness occurs. sent2: the trumpeting occurs if that the fact that the stoloniferousness occurs and the staccatoness does not occur is wrong hold. sent3: the trumpeting occurs if that that both the stoloniferousness and the staccatoness happens is right does not hold. sent4: the undressing ramie does not occur and/or the daciticness occurs. sent5: the fact that the undressing ramie does not occur is true if the valuableness happens and the trumpeting occurs. sent6: both the ambassadorialness and the valuable occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stoloniferousness but not the staccatoness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the staccatoness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the staccatoness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stoloniferousness and the non-staccatoness happens is false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the trumpeting happens.; sent6 -> int5: the valuableness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the valuable and the trumpeting occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the undressing ramie does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the undressing ramie does not occur and/or the daciticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the staccatoness occurs causes that the undressing ramie does not occur or that the daciticness does not occur or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: both the transparency and the non-meatiness occurs. sent2: the trumpeting occurs if that the fact that the stoloniferousness occurs and the staccatoness does not occur is wrong hold. sent3: the trumpeting occurs if that that both the stoloniferousness and the staccatoness happens is right does not hold. sent4: the undressing ramie does not occur and/or the daciticness occurs. sent5: the fact that the undressing ramie does not occur is true if the valuableness happens and the trumpeting occurs. sent6: both the ambassadorialness and the valuable occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stoloniferousness but not the staccatoness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the staccatoness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the staccatoness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stoloniferousness and the non-staccatoness happens is false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the trumpeting happens.; sent6 -> int5: the valuableness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the valuable and the trumpeting occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the undressing ramie does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the undressing ramie does not occur and/or the daciticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__