the boost occurs and the melanizing spiderwort happens.
sent1: the answering Periplaneta happens. sent2: the boost occurs if the manhood occurs. sent3: the angelicness occurs. sent4: that both the non-philosophicalness and the non-post-communistness occurs is wrong if the manhood does not occur. sent5: the parking and the non-dysphoricness occurs. sent6: the reducing does not occur but the malversation happens. sent7: the repining nonstop happens if the diapedesis happens. sent8: the attenuating happens. sent9: that the Angelus happens is correct if the baffling occurs. sent10: the philosophicalness happens. sent11: the melanizing spiderwort happens. sent12: the post-communistness does not occur if both the fernlessness and the singularizing steeplejack occurs. sent13: if the parking happens then the post-communistness happens. sent14: the MRI occurs. sent15: that the startup occurs is wrong. sent16: if the repining flabbiness occurs the fernlessness occurs. sent17: if the MRI happens then the singularizing steeplejack happens. sent18: the dysphoricness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the repining flabbiness happens.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fernlessness occurs.; sent17 & sent14 -> int2: the singularizing steeplejack happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the fernlessness and the singularizing steeplejack occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the post-communistness does not occur.; sent5 -> int5: the parking happens.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the post-communistness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the repining flabbiness does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the repining flabbiness does not occur and the philosophicalness happens.;
the melanizing gaseousness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the boost occurs and the melanizing spiderwort happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the answering Periplaneta happens. sent2: the boost occurs if the manhood occurs. sent3: the angelicness occurs. sent4: that both the non-philosophicalness and the non-post-communistness occurs is wrong if the manhood does not occur. sent5: the parking and the non-dysphoricness occurs. sent6: the reducing does not occur but the malversation happens. sent7: the repining nonstop happens if the diapedesis happens. sent8: the attenuating happens. sent9: that the Angelus happens is correct if the baffling occurs. sent10: the philosophicalness happens. sent11: the melanizing spiderwort happens. sent12: the post-communistness does not occur if both the fernlessness and the singularizing steeplejack occurs. sent13: if the parking happens then the post-communistness happens. sent14: the MRI occurs. sent15: that the startup occurs is wrong. sent16: if the repining flabbiness occurs the fernlessness occurs. sent17: if the MRI happens then the singularizing steeplejack happens. sent18: the dysphoricness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the repining flabbiness happens.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fernlessness occurs.; sent17 & sent14 -> int2: the singularizing steeplejack happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the fernlessness and the singularizing steeplejack occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the post-communistness does not occur.; sent5 -> int5: the parking happens.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the post-communistness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the repining flabbiness does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the repining flabbiness does not occur and the philosophicalness happens.; __UNKNOWN__