there is something such that if it is gyral then it is not chaotic but immaterial.
sent1: that there exists something such that if it is gyral it is not chaotic is true. sent2: there is something such that if it is painful then it does not polka and it does pass. sent3: if the lough is a kind of a motivation then it is not gyral and it is not nonrepetitive. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a broadcloth then it is both not clitoral and testaceous. sent5: the boson is not chaotic but it is patriarchal if that it is molal hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not non-gyral it is immaterial. sent7: there exists something such that if it is gyral then it is chaotic and immaterial. sent8: if something is a Jowett then it is not a kind of a cassette and is a Balaenopteridae. sent9: that the boson is immaterial is not incorrect if it is gyral. sent10: something is not a kind of a dollar but it is a Jowett if it sneers rasher. sent11: there is something such that if it does unionize Maginot then it is non-chemical and it is a kind of a RAM. sent12: if the boson is voluntary it is not eradicable and it is immaterial. sent13: something is not taciturn and does resize hemiparasite if it is a heaviness. sent14: there is something such that if it sneers acarus then it is not a husk and is a etcher. sent15: if the boson is gyral then it is chaotic and it is immaterial. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Goofy it is not a scrub and sneers Scholasticism. sent17: something is both not voluntary and not non-topped if it does snuffle. sent18: if the boson is immaterial it is not a fell and is normotensive. sent19: the fact that the boson is not eradicable but it is alienable if the boson is chaotic is not false.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is gyral then it is not chaotic but immaterial. ; $context$ = sent1: that there exists something such that if it is gyral it is not chaotic is true. sent2: there is something such that if it is painful then it does not polka and it does pass. sent3: if the lough is a kind of a motivation then it is not gyral and it is not nonrepetitive. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a broadcloth then it is both not clitoral and testaceous. sent5: the boson is not chaotic but it is patriarchal if that it is molal hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not non-gyral it is immaterial. sent7: there exists something such that if it is gyral then it is chaotic and immaterial. sent8: if something is a Jowett then it is not a kind of a cassette and is a Balaenopteridae. sent9: that the boson is immaterial is not incorrect if it is gyral. sent10: something is not a kind of a dollar but it is a Jowett if it sneers rasher. sent11: there is something such that if it does unionize Maginot then it is non-chemical and it is a kind of a RAM. sent12: if the boson is voluntary it is not eradicable and it is immaterial. sent13: something is not taciturn and does resize hemiparasite if it is a heaviness. sent14: there is something such that if it sneers acarus then it is not a husk and is a etcher. sent15: if the boson is gyral then it is chaotic and it is immaterial. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Goofy it is not a scrub and sneers Scholasticism. sent17: something is both not voluntary and not non-topped if it does snuffle. sent18: if the boson is immaterial it is not a fell and is normotensive. sent19: the fact that the boson is not eradicable but it is alienable if the boson is chaotic is not false. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__