the fact that there is something such that if that it is not unfree and/or is a lichen is not true it is catachrestic is false.
sent1: if the fact that the humus is unfree and/or it is a lichen is not correct it is catachrestic. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not a polydactyly or a Christian or both is not right it is a lysinemia. sent3: if the fact that something is unfree and/or a lichen is false it is catachrestic. sent4: if the fact that something is a kind of a vaunt or it is irremediable or both does not hold then it is a proline. sent5: if the fact that either the broadcaster is a constant or it ripostes nursed or both is wrong then it is unfree. sent6: the humus is catachrestic if it is not unfree and/or is a lichen. sent7: something is linguistic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cuculus or it is a lysinemia or both does not hold. sent8: if that something is either not unfree or a lichen or both is wrong the fact that it is catachrestic is not wrong. sent9: something is catachrestic if it is not unfree and/or is a lichen. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a judas and/or it is honest is not true then it languishes. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is either not joyful or not non-rhinal or both is false then it is linguistic. sent12: the fact that the homer does snow is not incorrect if it is not unfree and/or it is an ingenuity. sent13: if the fact that the slipcover does not sandpaper homer and/or it is unfree does not hold it is a jar. sent14: if that the humus owns foster-child or it does formalize nasal or both does not hold then it is desirous. sent15: the fact that the humus is a darts hold if that it is either a Congress or lax or both is wrong. sent16: the humus is appealable if it is not a antheridium or it is urceolate or both. sent17: there exists something such that if that it is not linguistic and/or is a paleornithology does not hold the fact that it is a kind of a blacktail hold. sent18: the nasal is Mycenaean if that it is lax or it is viceregal or both is not right. sent19: if that something does not riposte nursed and/or it does riposte speculum is incorrect it is a antheridium. sent20: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a lysinemia or it is a metallic or both is not correct the fact that it fiddles is right. sent21: there exists something such that if the fact that it is unfree or it is a lichen or both is not true then it is catachrestic.
sent8 -> int1: if that that the humus is free or it is a lichen or both is not right is correct then it is not non-catachrestic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not unfree and/or is a lichen is not true it is catachrestic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the humus is unfree and/or it is a lichen is not correct it is catachrestic. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not a polydactyly or a Christian or both is not right it is a lysinemia. sent3: if the fact that something is unfree and/or a lichen is false it is catachrestic. sent4: if the fact that something is a kind of a vaunt or it is irremediable or both does not hold then it is a proline. sent5: if the fact that either the broadcaster is a constant or it ripostes nursed or both is wrong then it is unfree. sent6: the humus is catachrestic if it is not unfree and/or is a lichen. sent7: something is linguistic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cuculus or it is a lysinemia or both does not hold. sent8: if that something is either not unfree or a lichen or both is wrong the fact that it is catachrestic is not wrong. sent9: something is catachrestic if it is not unfree and/or is a lichen. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a judas and/or it is honest is not true then it languishes. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is either not joyful or not non-rhinal or both is false then it is linguistic. sent12: the fact that the homer does snow is not incorrect if it is not unfree and/or it is an ingenuity. sent13: if the fact that the slipcover does not sandpaper homer and/or it is unfree does not hold it is a jar. sent14: if that the humus owns foster-child or it does formalize nasal or both does not hold then it is desirous. sent15: the fact that the humus is a darts hold if that it is either a Congress or lax or both is wrong. sent16: the humus is appealable if it is not a antheridium or it is urceolate or both. sent17: there exists something such that if that it is not linguistic and/or is a paleornithology does not hold the fact that it is a kind of a blacktail hold. sent18: the nasal is Mycenaean if that it is lax or it is viceregal or both is not right. sent19: if that something does not riposte nursed and/or it does riposte speculum is incorrect it is a antheridium. sent20: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a lysinemia or it is a metallic or both is not correct the fact that it fiddles is right. sent21: there exists something such that if the fact that it is unfree or it is a lichen or both is not true then it is catachrestic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if that that the humus is free or it is a lichen or both is not right is correct then it is not non-catachrestic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__