the rocambole is prehensile but it is not a bastardization.
sent1: something that is prehensile thing that is not a bastardization is not ichorous. sent2: the cackler is prehensile if the mamo is a trochee. sent3: the nosher is not a tablecloth if the cackler is not a kind of a trochee. sent4: the fact that the nosher is both not ichorous and not a guidebook does not hold if the rocambole is not ichorous. sent5: the cackler is not a trochee if there exists something such that that the fact that it is both a trochee and a panther is not false is incorrect. sent6: if the cackler is not a kind of a trochee then it is not a guidebook and it is not a kind of a tablecloth. sent7: something is not a kind of a guidebook if it is not a tablecloth. sent8: the rocambole is prehensile if that the cackler is prehensile hold. sent9: the nosher is not a guidebook if the fact that it is not a tablecloth hold. sent10: something that is not a kind of a tablecloth is non-ichorous and not a guidebook. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a trochee and it is a kind of a panther is wrong.
sent1 -> int1: if the rocambole is both prehensile and not a bastardization it is not ichorous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rocambole is a kind of prehensile thing that is not a kind of a bastardization.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the rocambole is not ichorous is true.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the nosher is both not ichorous and not a guidebook is wrong.; sent10 -> int4: if the nosher is not a tablecloth it is not ichorous and not a guidebook.; sent11 & sent5 -> int5: the cackler is not a kind of a trochee.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the nosher is not a kind of a tablecloth.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the nosher is a kind of non-ichorous thing that is not a guidebook.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the rocambole is prehensile and is not a kind of a bastardization.
$hypothesis$ = the rocambole is prehensile but it is not a bastardization. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is prehensile thing that is not a bastardization is not ichorous. sent2: the cackler is prehensile if the mamo is a trochee. sent3: the nosher is not a tablecloth if the cackler is not a kind of a trochee. sent4: the fact that the nosher is both not ichorous and not a guidebook does not hold if the rocambole is not ichorous. sent5: the cackler is not a trochee if there exists something such that that the fact that it is both a trochee and a panther is not false is incorrect. sent6: if the cackler is not a kind of a trochee then it is not a guidebook and it is not a kind of a tablecloth. sent7: something is not a kind of a guidebook if it is not a tablecloth. sent8: the rocambole is prehensile if that the cackler is prehensile hold. sent9: the nosher is not a guidebook if the fact that it is not a tablecloth hold. sent10: something that is not a kind of a tablecloth is non-ichorous and not a guidebook. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a trochee and it is a kind of a panther is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the rocambole is both prehensile and not a bastardization it is not ichorous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rocambole is a kind of prehensile thing that is not a kind of a bastardization.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the rocambole is not ichorous is true.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the nosher is both not ichorous and not a guidebook is wrong.; sent10 -> int4: if the nosher is not a tablecloth it is not ichorous and not a guidebook.; sent11 & sent5 -> int5: the cackler is not a kind of a trochee.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the nosher is not a kind of a tablecloth.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the nosher is a kind of non-ichorous thing that is not a guidebook.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__