the PVC notches Chrysomelidae.
sent1: the striker implodes if the fact that the fact that the dika is non-branchless thing that is not a periwig is wrong is not wrong. sent2: if the dika is branchless the striker implodes. sent3: the dika is a periwig and/or lands. sent4: the dika is not a concierge and is Hitlerian if it is not a kind of a wilt. sent5: that the dika is a kind of branchy thing that is not a periwig is incorrect. sent6: the PVC is not branchless. sent7: if something is not a wilt then it does not notch Chrysomelidae. sent8: the fact that the binding is crustal is not incorrect if the Turkey does not land but it is immunochemical. sent9: if the fact that the binding is not a kind of a cutlery is not wrong then that it is not a concierge and it does not clue model is not right. sent10: if the striker does wilt or does implode or both that the Turkey is not a land is right. sent11: the Turkey is not a land if the striker is a wilt. sent12: if the fact that something is not a kind of a concierge and does not clue model is not right it is not crustal. sent13: if something is a concierge then it is not crustal. sent14: if either the Turkey is immunochemical or it is a concierge or both the striker is not a wilt. sent15: the PVC does notch Chrysomelidae if the Turkey is not immunochemical.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the striker does implode.; int1 -> int2: the striker wilts or implodes or both.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the Turkey does not land.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Turkey is immunochemical.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the Turkey is not a land and is immunochemical.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the binding is crustal is right.; sent12 -> int6: that the binding is not crustal is not wrong if that it is not a concierge and does not clue model does not hold.;
the dika is not a kind of a concierge but it is Hitlerian.
$hypothesis$ = the PVC notches Chrysomelidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the striker implodes if the fact that the fact that the dika is non-branchless thing that is not a periwig is wrong is not wrong. sent2: if the dika is branchless the striker implodes. sent3: the dika is a periwig and/or lands. sent4: the dika is not a concierge and is Hitlerian if it is not a kind of a wilt. sent5: that the dika is a kind of branchy thing that is not a periwig is incorrect. sent6: the PVC is not branchless. sent7: if something is not a wilt then it does not notch Chrysomelidae. sent8: the fact that the binding is crustal is not incorrect if the Turkey does not land but it is immunochemical. sent9: if the fact that the binding is not a kind of a cutlery is not wrong then that it is not a concierge and it does not clue model is not right. sent10: if the striker does wilt or does implode or both that the Turkey is not a land is right. sent11: the Turkey is not a land if the striker is a wilt. sent12: if the fact that something is not a kind of a concierge and does not clue model is not right it is not crustal. sent13: if something is a concierge then it is not crustal. sent14: if either the Turkey is immunochemical or it is a concierge or both the striker is not a wilt. sent15: the PVC does notch Chrysomelidae if the Turkey is not immunochemical. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the striker does implode.; int1 -> int2: the striker wilts or implodes or both.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the Turkey does not land.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Turkey is immunochemical.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the Turkey is not a land and is immunochemical.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that the binding is crustal is right.; sent12 -> int6: that the binding is not crustal is not wrong if that it is not a concierge and does not clue model does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__