if the fascist is quartzose the Chamberlain does sag ghetto and/or it does not double.
sent1: the Chamberlain is a kind of non-doubling thing that is a kind of a Poussin if the fascist is quartzose. sent2: the emmer is physical. sent3: something is naive and seeps explicitness if it does not seep yucca. sent4: the emmer is a wicker or does not seep yucca or both if it is physical. sent5: the fascist is a Poussin. sent6: the tee is quartzose and/or it is a Anarhichadidae. sent7: the clapperboard is not epithelial if the fascist does not sag ghetto and is epithelial. sent8: if something is a kind of a wicker or does not seep yucca or both the Chamberlain does not seep yucca. sent9: if something is not quartzose it does not sag ghetto and it is epithelial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fascist is quartzose.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Chamberlain is both not doubling and a Poussin.; int1 -> int2: the Chamberlain is not a doubling.; int2 -> int3: the Chamberlain does sag ghetto or it does not double or both.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the clapperboard seeps excitement or is not epithelial or both.
sent9 -> int4: if the fascist is not quartzose then it does not sag ghetto and it is epithelial.; sent3 -> int5: if the Chamberlain does not seep yucca then it is naive and seeps explicitness.; sent4 & sent2 -> int6: the emmer is a kind of a wicker or it does not seep yucca or both.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that either it is a wicker or it does not seep yucca or both.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the Chamberlain does not seep yucca.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the Chamberlain is naive thing that does seep explicitness.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a kind of naive thing that does seep explicitness.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fascist is quartzose the Chamberlain does sag ghetto and/or it does not double. ; $context$ = sent1: the Chamberlain is a kind of non-doubling thing that is a kind of a Poussin if the fascist is quartzose. sent2: the emmer is physical. sent3: something is naive and seeps explicitness if it does not seep yucca. sent4: the emmer is a wicker or does not seep yucca or both if it is physical. sent5: the fascist is a Poussin. sent6: the tee is quartzose and/or it is a Anarhichadidae. sent7: the clapperboard is not epithelial if the fascist does not sag ghetto and is epithelial. sent8: if something is a kind of a wicker or does not seep yucca or both the Chamberlain does not seep yucca. sent9: if something is not quartzose it does not sag ghetto and it is epithelial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fascist is quartzose.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Chamberlain is both not doubling and a Poussin.; int1 -> int2: the Chamberlain is not a doubling.; int2 -> int3: the Chamberlain does sag ghetto or it does not double or both.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__