that the unclothing nonsmoker does not occur but the unclothing banker occurs is not correct.
sent1: if the nim happens the fact that not the unclothing nonsmoker but the unclothing banker occurs is not true. sent2: the fact that the embrowning Benzoin does not occur but the space occurs is correct. sent3: if that the nim does not occur is right then the disclosing does not occur and the impetiginousness occurs. sent4: the horning reinterpretation is brought about by that the unclothing aoudad occurs. sent5: the unclothing nonsmoker does not occur and the unclothing banker happens. sent6: if the fact that the unclothing Nintu does not occur is not wrong then the nim happens and the elevation occurs. sent7: the vignette does not occur and the zing occurs. sent8: the stowing coverage does not occur but the interlocutoriness happens. sent9: not the Milanese but the Romanness occurs. sent10: that both the foreclosure and the horning reinterpretation happens causes that the unclothing Nintu does not occur. sent11: the unclothing banker happens. sent12: if the fact that the elevation happens and the unclothing Nintu does not occur is not right then the nim does not occur. sent13: the unclothing Sade does not occur and the distinguishableness occurs. sent14: the aggressiveness does not occur but the pin occurs. sent15: that the foreclosure occurs and the embrowning quadriplegia occurs is brought about by that the embrowning Benzoin does not occur. sent16: not the yellow but the indemnification occurs.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the disclosing does not occur and the impetiginousness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the unclothing nonsmoker does not occur but the unclothing banker occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nim happens the fact that not the unclothing nonsmoker but the unclothing banker occurs is not true. sent2: the fact that the embrowning Benzoin does not occur but the space occurs is correct. sent3: if that the nim does not occur is right then the disclosing does not occur and the impetiginousness occurs. sent4: the horning reinterpretation is brought about by that the unclothing aoudad occurs. sent5: the unclothing nonsmoker does not occur and the unclothing banker happens. sent6: if the fact that the unclothing Nintu does not occur is not wrong then the nim happens and the elevation occurs. sent7: the vignette does not occur and the zing occurs. sent8: the stowing coverage does not occur but the interlocutoriness happens. sent9: not the Milanese but the Romanness occurs. sent10: that both the foreclosure and the horning reinterpretation happens causes that the unclothing Nintu does not occur. sent11: the unclothing banker happens. sent12: if the fact that the elevation happens and the unclothing Nintu does not occur is not right then the nim does not occur. sent13: the unclothing Sade does not occur and the distinguishableness occurs. sent14: the aggressiveness does not occur but the pin occurs. sent15: that the foreclosure occurs and the embrowning quadriplegia occurs is brought about by that the embrowning Benzoin does not occur. sent16: not the yellow but the indemnification occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__