the nitrofurantoin is not a crotaphion.
sent1: if something is a mischief it is a schizophrenic. sent2: the fact that the vegetation is posterior is right if the realgar is schizophrenic. sent3: the realgar is a mealybug if the nitrofurantoin is a kind of a crotaphion. sent4: the nitrofurantoin does not dull if there exists something such that the fact that it is dull but not a mischief is wrong. sent5: if the nitrofurantoin is a kind of a pteridophyte it is a mealybug. sent6: something is not a schizophrenic if it is dull. sent7: the realgar dulls and/or it is not a mealybug. sent8: something is not cytokinetic if it is a mischief. sent9: the vegetation is a kind of a frostiness. sent10: if the vegetation is a dummy it is Tantric. sent11: if the vegetation is a schizophrenic then it does not truss dregs. sent12: if the vegetation is a kind of a posterior it is not schizophrenic. sent13: that the realgar is dull and is not a mischief is not true if it is a kind of a schizophrenic. sent14: the fact that something is not a kind of a mealybug and is a crotaphion is not right if it is not cytokinetic. sent15: if the realgar is a crotaphion the nitrofurantoin is a crotaphion. sent16: if the realgar is not a kind of a posterior then the tartar is cytokinetic. sent17: the realgar is dull and is a kind of a posterior. sent18: that if that the tartar is a crotaphion is not wrong the realgar is a crotaphion hold. sent19: if something is not dull it is not cytokinetic. sent20: the vegetation dulls if that the tartar is cytokinetic is right. sent21: the realgar is a mealybug and/or a posterior. sent22: the vegetation is a kind of a mischief and it is a frostiness. sent23: the nitrofurantoin is not a kind of a posterior. sent24: the realgar is a mischief if the vegetation is a mealybug.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nitrofurantoin is a crotaphion.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the realgar is a kind of a mealybug is correct.; int1 -> int2: the realgar is a mealybug and/or is not a posterior.; sent6 -> int3: if the vegetation is dull then the fact that it is not a schizophrenic hold.; sent1 -> int4: if the vegetation is a mischief it is schizophrenic.; sent22 -> int5: the vegetation is a mischief.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the vegetation is a kind of a schizophrenic.;
the clerestory is posterior.
sent14 -> int7: if the nitrofurantoin is not cytokinetic that it is both not a mealybug and a crotaphion is incorrect.; sent19 -> int8: the nitrofurantoin is not cytokinetic if it is not dull.;
$hypothesis$ = the nitrofurantoin is not a crotaphion. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a mischief it is a schizophrenic. sent2: the fact that the vegetation is posterior is right if the realgar is schizophrenic. sent3: the realgar is a mealybug if the nitrofurantoin is a kind of a crotaphion. sent4: the nitrofurantoin does not dull if there exists something such that the fact that it is dull but not a mischief is wrong. sent5: if the nitrofurantoin is a kind of a pteridophyte it is a mealybug. sent6: something is not a schizophrenic if it is dull. sent7: the realgar dulls and/or it is not a mealybug. sent8: something is not cytokinetic if it is a mischief. sent9: the vegetation is a kind of a frostiness. sent10: if the vegetation is a dummy it is Tantric. sent11: if the vegetation is a schizophrenic then it does not truss dregs. sent12: if the vegetation is a kind of a posterior it is not schizophrenic. sent13: that the realgar is dull and is not a mischief is not true if it is a kind of a schizophrenic. sent14: the fact that something is not a kind of a mealybug and is a crotaphion is not right if it is not cytokinetic. sent15: if the realgar is a crotaphion the nitrofurantoin is a crotaphion. sent16: if the realgar is not a kind of a posterior then the tartar is cytokinetic. sent17: the realgar is dull and is a kind of a posterior. sent18: that if that the tartar is a crotaphion is not wrong the realgar is a crotaphion hold. sent19: if something is not dull it is not cytokinetic. sent20: the vegetation dulls if that the tartar is cytokinetic is right. sent21: the realgar is a mealybug and/or a posterior. sent22: the vegetation is a kind of a mischief and it is a frostiness. sent23: the nitrofurantoin is not a kind of a posterior. sent24: the realgar is a mischief if the vegetation is a mealybug. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nitrofurantoin is a crotaphion.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the realgar is a kind of a mealybug is correct.; int1 -> int2: the realgar is a mealybug and/or is not a posterior.; sent6 -> int3: if the vegetation is dull then the fact that it is not a schizophrenic hold.; sent1 -> int4: if the vegetation is a mischief it is schizophrenic.; sent22 -> int5: the vegetation is a mischief.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the vegetation is a kind of a schizophrenic.; __UNKNOWN__