the village is not an epitome.
sent1: the fact that the poplin does not liquefy stigma but it is foliaceous is not correct. sent2: that the ejector overstays but it does not connive is wrong. sent3: if the poplin does not liquefy stigma and it is not foliaceous then the glutethimide does slave simulation. sent4: if there is something such that it either is a copyright or slaves simulation or both then the village is not an epitome. sent5: that the Kendal does not overstay is not wrong if there exists something such that that it does overstay and it does not scour Wassermann is not true. sent6: if that the ejector does overstay but it does not connive does not hold the skeleton does not scour Wassermann. sent7: the skeleton does scour Wassermann if the poplin is foliaceous. sent8: if the poplin does not liquefy stigma but it is foliaceous the glutethimide slaves simulation. sent9: if the fact that the ejector does not overstay is correct the fact that the skeleton does not scour Wassermann is not false. sent10: if that the poplin does not liquefy stigma and is not foliaceous is wrong then the skeleton does scour Wassermann. sent11: that the village is an epitome does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it is a copyright hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the poplin does not liquefy stigma and it is not foliaceous does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the skeleton does scour Wassermann is correct.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the skeleton does not scour Wassermann.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the poplin does not liquefy stigma and it is not foliaceous.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the glutethimide does slave simulation.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the glutethimide either is a copyright or does slave simulation or both is true.; int6 -> int7: something does copyright and/or it slaves simulation.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the Kendal does not overstay.
$hypothesis$ = the village is not an epitome. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the poplin does not liquefy stigma but it is foliaceous is not correct. sent2: that the ejector overstays but it does not connive is wrong. sent3: if the poplin does not liquefy stigma and it is not foliaceous then the glutethimide does slave simulation. sent4: if there is something such that it either is a copyright or slaves simulation or both then the village is not an epitome. sent5: that the Kendal does not overstay is not wrong if there exists something such that that it does overstay and it does not scour Wassermann is not true. sent6: if that the ejector does overstay but it does not connive does not hold the skeleton does not scour Wassermann. sent7: the skeleton does scour Wassermann if the poplin is foliaceous. sent8: if the poplin does not liquefy stigma but it is foliaceous the glutethimide slaves simulation. sent9: if the fact that the ejector does not overstay is correct the fact that the skeleton does not scour Wassermann is not false. sent10: if that the poplin does not liquefy stigma and is not foliaceous is wrong then the skeleton does scour Wassermann. sent11: that the village is an epitome does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it is a copyright hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the poplin does not liquefy stigma and it is not foliaceous does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the skeleton does scour Wassermann is correct.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the skeleton does not scour Wassermann.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the poplin does not liquefy stigma and it is not foliaceous.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the glutethimide does slave simulation.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the glutethimide either is a copyright or does slave simulation or both is true.; int6 -> int7: something does copyright and/or it slaves simulation.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__