that the seminiferousness occurs if the fact that the Zolaesqueness occurs is not wrong is not true.
sent1: the non-seminiferousness is triggered by that the harmfulness and the taxableness occurs. sent2: if the antitypicness occurs the breakage occurs. sent3: the recording occurs if the tankage occurs. sent4: the harmlessness occurs if the taxableness does not occur. sent5: the seminiferousness occurs and the harmlessness happens if the taxableness does not occur. sent6: if the breakage happens then the harmfulness and the taxableness happens. sent7: the fact that the instructionalness does not occur and the affinity does not occur does not hold if the morbilliformness does not occur. sent8: that the keratinizing does not occur yields that the comforting does not occur and the crapshoot does not occur. sent9: that the Zolaesqueness does not occur yields that the non-viralness and the non-morbilliformness occurs. sent10: if the record occurs then the antitypicness happens. sent11: the breakage does not occur. sent12: if the comforting does not occur then the rhinalness and the tankage occurs. sent13: that the instructionalness does not occur and the affinity does not occur is caused by that the breakage does not occur. sent14: the unrepeatableness does not occur and the singing does not occur. sent15: the instructionalness does not occur if the breakage does not occur. sent16: the non-taxableness is caused by that the morbilliformness occurs and the Zolaesqueness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the morbilliformness does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the instructionalness does not occur and the affinity does not occur does not hold.; sent13 & sent11 -> int2: the instructionalness does not occur and the affinity does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the morbilliformness occurs is true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Zolaesqueness happens.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: both the morbilliformness and the Zolaesqueness occurs.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the taxableness does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the seminiferousness happens and the harmlessness happens.; int7 -> int8: the seminiferousness occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the viralness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the seminiferousness occurs if the fact that the Zolaesqueness occurs is not wrong is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-seminiferousness is triggered by that the harmfulness and the taxableness occurs. sent2: if the antitypicness occurs the breakage occurs. sent3: the recording occurs if the tankage occurs. sent4: the harmlessness occurs if the taxableness does not occur. sent5: the seminiferousness occurs and the harmlessness happens if the taxableness does not occur. sent6: if the breakage happens then the harmfulness and the taxableness happens. sent7: the fact that the instructionalness does not occur and the affinity does not occur does not hold if the morbilliformness does not occur. sent8: that the keratinizing does not occur yields that the comforting does not occur and the crapshoot does not occur. sent9: that the Zolaesqueness does not occur yields that the non-viralness and the non-morbilliformness occurs. sent10: if the record occurs then the antitypicness happens. sent11: the breakage does not occur. sent12: if the comforting does not occur then the rhinalness and the tankage occurs. sent13: that the instructionalness does not occur and the affinity does not occur is caused by that the breakage does not occur. sent14: the unrepeatableness does not occur and the singing does not occur. sent15: the instructionalness does not occur if the breakage does not occur. sent16: the non-taxableness is caused by that the morbilliformness occurs and the Zolaesqueness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the morbilliformness does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the instructionalness does not occur and the affinity does not occur does not hold.; sent13 & sent11 -> int2: the instructionalness does not occur and the affinity does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the morbilliformness occurs is true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Zolaesqueness happens.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: both the morbilliformness and the Zolaesqueness occurs.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the taxableness does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the seminiferousness happens and the harmlessness happens.; int7 -> int8: the seminiferousness occurs.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__