something is a Dilleniidae and does launder.
sent1: that the caustic bankrupts immutability is right. sent2: the mealberry is either a wound or a barye or both. sent3: the mealberry is a barye or it is a kind of a Dilleniidae or both if the caustic is not an admiralty. sent4: the hepatotoxin does bankrupt immutability. sent5: if the gastrolobium unseals europium and it canvasses then it is not a wound. sent6: there is something such that it is not a Liederkranz. sent7: if something that does unseal europium does canvass it is not a kind of a wound. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Liederkranz then the gastrolobium does not unseal europium but it canvasses. sent9: if the mealberry is a barye the stinger is a wound. sent10: if something that does not unseal europium does canvass then it is not a wound. sent11: the caustic is a kind of a Dilleniidae if the mealberry is a barye. sent12: if the gastrolobium is not a wound the fact that the mealberry is a kind of an admiralty and/or is a barye is not incorrect. sent13: everything launders and bankrupts immutability. sent14: if the mealberry is an admiralty the caustic is a Dilleniidae.
sent10 -> int1: if the gastrolobium does not unseal europium but it does canvass then it is not a kind of a wound.; sent6 & sent8 -> int2: the gastrolobium does not unseal europium and does canvass.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the gastrolobium does not wind is not incorrect.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the mealberry is an admiralty and/or it is a barye.; int4 & sent14 & sent11 -> int5: the caustic is a Dilleniidae.; sent13 -> int6: the caustic launders and it does bankrupt immutability.; int6 -> int7: the caustic does launder.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the caustic is a Dilleniidae that launders.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the stinger is not a kind of an alveolar but it canvasses.
$hypothesis$ = something is a Dilleniidae and does launder. ; $context$ = sent1: that the caustic bankrupts immutability is right. sent2: the mealberry is either a wound or a barye or both. sent3: the mealberry is a barye or it is a kind of a Dilleniidae or both if the caustic is not an admiralty. sent4: the hepatotoxin does bankrupt immutability. sent5: if the gastrolobium unseals europium and it canvasses then it is not a wound. sent6: there is something such that it is not a Liederkranz. sent7: if something that does unseal europium does canvass it is not a kind of a wound. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Liederkranz then the gastrolobium does not unseal europium but it canvasses. sent9: if the mealberry is a barye the stinger is a wound. sent10: if something that does not unseal europium does canvass then it is not a wound. sent11: the caustic is a kind of a Dilleniidae if the mealberry is a barye. sent12: if the gastrolobium is not a wound the fact that the mealberry is a kind of an admiralty and/or is a barye is not incorrect. sent13: everything launders and bankrupts immutability. sent14: if the mealberry is an admiralty the caustic is a Dilleniidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the gastrolobium does not unseal europium but it does canvass then it is not a kind of a wound.; sent6 & sent8 -> int2: the gastrolobium does not unseal europium and does canvass.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the gastrolobium does not wind is not incorrect.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the mealberry is an admiralty and/or it is a barye.; int4 & sent14 & sent11 -> int5: the caustic is a Dilleniidae.; sent13 -> int6: the caustic launders and it does bankrupt immutability.; int6 -> int7: the caustic does launder.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the caustic is a Dilleniidae that launders.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__