the newswoman does not instruct Rous and is a hypodermic.
sent1: the kieserite is a burrow if that the molding is not responsive is not false. sent2: if the magnetization is a kind of a shingler then the fact that the footwall does instruct Rous is not wrong. sent3: if that something does not dispel and it does not ramble verst is not correct it is not a shingler. sent4: the fact that the newswoman does not instruct Rous and is hypodermic is not right if the footwall does instruct Rous. sent5: if the molding is nonextensile or is not a shingler or both then the newswoman does not delineate. sent6: something does not decant and is not Sadducean if the fact that it is not a kind of a foresail is true. sent7: the magnetization is nonextensile if the molding is responsive. sent8: if something is nonextensile it is a shingler. sent9: the ruthenium is not a perpendicular. sent10: the fact that the kieserite does not dispel and it does not ramble verst does not hold. sent11: the ruthenium does delineate if the kieserite is a burrow. sent12: something is not responsive if it is a kind of a burrow and it does not delineate. sent13: if the footwall does instruct Rous that the newswoman does instruct Rous and is a kind of a hypodermic does not hold. sent14: that the newswoman does instruct Rous and it is a kind of a hypodermic does not hold. sent15: the fact that something does not instruct Rous but it is a kind of a hypodermic if it is not responsive hold. sent16: that the ruthenium is abyssal and it is infelicitous is false if it is not a kind of a perpendicular. sent17: if something that does not decant is not Sadducean then the fact that it is a burrow is right. sent18: the ruthenium does not delineate and it does not decant. sent19: the newswoman is not a kind of a foresail if there is something such that that it is abyssal and it is infelicitous does not hold. sent20: if something is both not a burrow and responsive then that the desktop does instruct Rous is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the molding is not responsive.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the kieserite is a kind of a burrow.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the ruthenium does delineate.; sent18 -> int3: the ruthenium does not delineate.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the molding is responsive.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the magnetization is nonextensile.; sent8 -> int7: the magnetization is a kind of a shingler if it is nonextensile.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the magnetization is a shingler.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the footwall instructs Rous.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the newswoman does not instruct Rous but it is a hypodermic hold.
sent15 -> int10: if the newswoman is not responsive it does not instruct Rous and it is a hypodermic.; sent12 -> int11: that the newswoman is not responsive is not wrong if it is a kind of a burrow that does not delineate.; sent17 -> int12: if the newswoman does not decant and it is not Sadducean it is a burrow.; sent6 -> int13: if the newswoman is not a kind of a foresail it does not decant and is not Sadducean.; sent16 & sent9 -> int14: the fact that the ruthenium is abyssal and it is infelicitous is incorrect.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that that it is abyssal and it is infelicitous is not right.; int15 & sent19 -> int16: the newswoman is not a kind of a foresail.; int13 & int16 -> int17: the newswoman does not decant and is not Sadducean.; int12 & int17 -> int18: the newswoman burrows.; sent3 -> int19: if that the kieserite does not dispel and does not ramble verst is not correct it is not a shingler.; int19 & sent10 -> int20: that the kieserite is not a kind of a shingler is true.; int20 -> int21: something is not a shingler.;
$hypothesis$ = the newswoman does not instruct Rous and is a hypodermic. ; $context$ = sent1: the kieserite is a burrow if that the molding is not responsive is not false. sent2: if the magnetization is a kind of a shingler then the fact that the footwall does instruct Rous is not wrong. sent3: if that something does not dispel and it does not ramble verst is not correct it is not a shingler. sent4: the fact that the newswoman does not instruct Rous and is hypodermic is not right if the footwall does instruct Rous. sent5: if the molding is nonextensile or is not a shingler or both then the newswoman does not delineate. sent6: something does not decant and is not Sadducean if the fact that it is not a kind of a foresail is true. sent7: the magnetization is nonextensile if the molding is responsive. sent8: if something is nonextensile it is a shingler. sent9: the ruthenium is not a perpendicular. sent10: the fact that the kieserite does not dispel and it does not ramble verst does not hold. sent11: the ruthenium does delineate if the kieserite is a burrow. sent12: something is not responsive if it is a kind of a burrow and it does not delineate. sent13: if the footwall does instruct Rous that the newswoman does instruct Rous and is a kind of a hypodermic does not hold. sent14: that the newswoman does instruct Rous and it is a kind of a hypodermic does not hold. sent15: the fact that something does not instruct Rous but it is a kind of a hypodermic if it is not responsive hold. sent16: that the ruthenium is abyssal and it is infelicitous is false if it is not a kind of a perpendicular. sent17: if something that does not decant is not Sadducean then the fact that it is a burrow is right. sent18: the ruthenium does not delineate and it does not decant. sent19: the newswoman is not a kind of a foresail if there is something such that that it is abyssal and it is infelicitous does not hold. sent20: if something is both not a burrow and responsive then that the desktop does instruct Rous is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the molding is not responsive.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the kieserite is a kind of a burrow.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the ruthenium does delineate.; sent18 -> int3: the ruthenium does not delineate.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the molding is responsive.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the magnetization is nonextensile.; sent8 -> int7: the magnetization is a kind of a shingler if it is nonextensile.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the magnetization is a shingler.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the footwall instructs Rous.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__