the fact that the etcetera does not covet kyat and is anagogic is not correct.
sent1: something is not diagonalizable and it is not a kind of an immortal if it is a megaphone. sent2: if something is non-diagonalizable thing that is not immortal it does covet kyat. sent3: the gamin is immortal if the fact that the hogchoker is not an immortal but it is a megaphone does not hold. sent4: if something is an immortal then it does not covet kyat. sent5: the etcetera does not covet Leptarrhena. sent6: if something is an immortal it does not covet kyat and it is anagogic. sent7: the etcetera is not cenogenetic. sent8: the compulsive is a kind of non-immortal thing that does treat gamin if it is a kind of an empty. sent9: the etcetera is immortal and it is diagonalizable. sent10: something is non-immortal thing that is diagonalizable if it does covet kyat. sent11: the chuck-will's-widow does covet kyat.
sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the etcetera is not non-immortal is correct it does not covet kyat and it is anagogic.; sent9 -> int2: the etcetera is a kind of an immortal.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the etcetera does not covet kyat but it is anagogic is not correct.
sent2 -> int3: if the hogchoker is both not diagonalizable and not immortal then it covets kyat.; sent1 -> int4: if that the hogchoker is not a megaphone is incorrect then that it is not diagonalizable and is not a kind of an immortal hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the etcetera does not covet kyat and is anagogic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not diagonalizable and it is not a kind of an immortal if it is a megaphone. sent2: if something is non-diagonalizable thing that is not immortal it does covet kyat. sent3: the gamin is immortal if the fact that the hogchoker is not an immortal but it is a megaphone does not hold. sent4: if something is an immortal then it does not covet kyat. sent5: the etcetera does not covet Leptarrhena. sent6: if something is an immortal it does not covet kyat and it is anagogic. sent7: the etcetera is not cenogenetic. sent8: the compulsive is a kind of non-immortal thing that does treat gamin if it is a kind of an empty. sent9: the etcetera is immortal and it is diagonalizable. sent10: something is non-immortal thing that is diagonalizable if it does covet kyat. sent11: the chuck-will's-widow does covet kyat. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the etcetera is not non-immortal is correct it does not covet kyat and it is anagogic.; sent9 -> int2: the etcetera is a kind of an immortal.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__