that there is something such that if it ferrets blanquillo the fact that it does not cloud Lithane and it is rotatory is not correct is not correct.
sent1: the fact that something is both not a horse-trail and photic is not true if it is a grisaille. sent2: that the swallowtail is available and is scarce is incorrect if it is a Creole. sent3: something does not cloud Lithane but it is rotatory if it ferrets blanquillo. sent4: the fact that something does not cloud Lithane but it is rotatory is not correct if it ferrets blanquillo. sent5: that the blanquillo does not cloud Lithane and clouds uropygium does not hold if it does wobble moa. sent6: the blanquillo does not cloud Lithane and is rotatory if it ferrets blanquillo. sent7: that something clouds Lithane and is rotatory is not right if it ferrets blanquillo. sent8: that there is something such that if it does ferret blanquillo then it does not cloud Lithane and is rotatory is not wrong. sent9: if the blanquillo is a kind of a spontaneity that it does not cloud swallowtail and it does ferret cabotage does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it ferrets clerid then that it is non-chyliferous thing that does cloud walloper is not true. sent11: the fact that that the blanquillo does cloud Lithane and it is rotatory does not hold if the blanquillo does ferret blanquillo hold. sent12: there is something such that if it does ferret blanquillo then the fact that it clouds Lithane and it is not non-rotatory is incorrect.
sent4 -> int1: that that the blanquillo does not cloud Lithane and is rotatory is not false is incorrect if it ferrets blanquillo.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it ferrets blanquillo the fact that it does not cloud Lithane and it is rotatory is not correct is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is both not a horse-trail and photic is not true if it is a grisaille. sent2: that the swallowtail is available and is scarce is incorrect if it is a Creole. sent3: something does not cloud Lithane but it is rotatory if it ferrets blanquillo. sent4: the fact that something does not cloud Lithane but it is rotatory is not correct if it ferrets blanquillo. sent5: that the blanquillo does not cloud Lithane and clouds uropygium does not hold if it does wobble moa. sent6: the blanquillo does not cloud Lithane and is rotatory if it ferrets blanquillo. sent7: that something clouds Lithane and is rotatory is not right if it ferrets blanquillo. sent8: that there is something such that if it does ferret blanquillo then it does not cloud Lithane and is rotatory is not wrong. sent9: if the blanquillo is a kind of a spontaneity that it does not cloud swallowtail and it does ferret cabotage does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it ferrets clerid then that it is non-chyliferous thing that does cloud walloper is not true. sent11: the fact that that the blanquillo does cloud Lithane and it is rotatory does not hold if the blanquillo does ferret blanquillo hold. sent12: there is something such that if it does ferret blanquillo then the fact that it clouds Lithane and it is not non-rotatory is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that that the blanquillo does not cloud Lithane and is rotatory is not false is incorrect if it ferrets blanquillo.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__