the sporophore is non-polarographic thing that is a kind of a Tho.
sent1: the lunching is a secessionist if the fact that the servicing is both not a secessionist and not grammatical is not true. sent2: the sporophore is a kind of a stewpan that is not polarographic. sent3: if the workspace is a stewpan then the spiracle is not a Samarkand. sent4: if the workspace is a kind of a Finnish but it is not a stewpan then the lunching is not a secessionist. sent5: the fact that the workspace is Finnish and it is a stewpan is false. sent6: the fact that the servicing is not a secessionist but it is grammatical is incorrect. sent7: the spiracle is not a Samarkand if the fact that the workspace is a Finnish but it is not a stewpan is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the servicing is not a secessionist and it is not grammatical is wrong. sent9: that that the sporophore is not polarographic but it is a Tho is not wrong does not hold if there is something such that it is not a Samarkand. sent10: that the fact that the fact that the sporophore is polarographic thing that is a Tho is right is false is right if something is not a Samarkand.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the workspace is a Finnish that is not a stewpan.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the lunching is not a secessionist.; sent1 & sent8 -> int2: the lunching is a secessionist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the workspace is both Finnish and not a stewpan is not right.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the spiracle is not a Samarkand.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not a Samarkand.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sporophore is non-polarographic thing that is a kind of a Tho. ; $context$ = sent1: the lunching is a secessionist if the fact that the servicing is both not a secessionist and not grammatical is not true. sent2: the sporophore is a kind of a stewpan that is not polarographic. sent3: if the workspace is a stewpan then the spiracle is not a Samarkand. sent4: if the workspace is a kind of a Finnish but it is not a stewpan then the lunching is not a secessionist. sent5: the fact that the workspace is Finnish and it is a stewpan is false. sent6: the fact that the servicing is not a secessionist but it is grammatical is incorrect. sent7: the spiracle is not a Samarkand if the fact that the workspace is a Finnish but it is not a stewpan is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the servicing is not a secessionist and it is not grammatical is wrong. sent9: that that the sporophore is not polarographic but it is a Tho is not wrong does not hold if there is something such that it is not a Samarkand. sent10: that the fact that the fact that the sporophore is polarographic thing that is a Tho is right is false is right if something is not a Samarkand. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the workspace is a Finnish that is not a stewpan.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the lunching is not a secessionist.; sent1 & sent8 -> int2: the lunching is a secessionist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the workspace is both Finnish and not a stewpan is not right.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the spiracle is not a Samarkand.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not a Samarkand.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__