the vacuole does not resist.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a hopefulness but it is a Garfield it does not resist. sent2: the ringlet is not a Garfield and does resist if the illustrator is not a hopefulness. sent3: if the illustrator is a megalosaur then it is a kind of a wilderness. sent4: the illustrator is not a aliquant if the ringlet is not intrusive. sent5: something is a hopefulness. sent6: if something is a wilderness it is not intrusive and it is not a aliquant. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a hopefulness. sent8: the polygraph is not a photon if there exists something such that it is not operable. sent9: the darner is not operable. sent10: the illustrator is not a kind of a aliquant if the ringlet is not orthoptic. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not better nomogram then the illustrator does weed crowberry but it is not a megalosaur. sent12: the polygraph does not depressurize. sent13: if that the ringlet is not a aliquant and is not orthoptic does not hold then the elephant is not orthoptic. sent14: if that something is not a Garfield hold then it does resist and is a hopefulness. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Garfield it is not intrusive or it is not orthoptic or both. sent16: the leaf is not cyprian. sent17: if the fact that there is something such that it is not a kind of a aliquant is not false then the vacuole does not resist. sent18: the wrymouth is meteoric if there exists something such that the fact that either it is not antitypic or it is not a midinette or both is not correct. sent19: if the illustrator is a wilderness then it is intrusive. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is a aliquant is not incorrect. sent21: if something is not a hopefulness the ringlet is not a Garfield. sent22: the fact that something is a kind of a Garfield and it is orthoptic is incorrect if it is not intrusive. sent23: if that the nomogram does not depressurize is correct the fact that it is not antitypic or it is not a kind of a midinette or both is not correct. sent24: the vacuole does not better Cicadidae and/or is not a savage. sent25: the Aegyptopithecus does not better nomogram if the wrymouth is meteoric. sent26: the nomogram does not depressurize if the polygraph is not a photon and does not depressurize.
sent7 & sent21 -> int1: the ringlet is not a Garfield.; sent15 -> int2: if the ringlet is not a Garfield then it is not intrusive or it is non-orthoptic or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ringlet is either not intrusive or not orthoptic or both.; int3 & sent4 & sent10 -> int4: the illustrator is not a kind of a aliquant.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a aliquant.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the vacuole does resist.
sent14 -> int6: the vacuole does resist and is a hopefulness if that it is a Garfield is not right.; sent22 -> int7: that the ringlet is both a Garfield and orthoptic does not hold if it is not intrusive.; sent6 -> int8: if the ringlet is a wilderness then it is not intrusive and it is not a kind of a aliquant.; sent9 -> int9: something is inoperable.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the polygraph is not a kind of a photon.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the polygraph is not a photon and does not depressurize.; sent26 & int11 -> int12: the nomogram does not depressurize.; sent23 & int12 -> int13: that the nomogram is not antitypic and/or is not a midinette does not hold.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is not antitypic and/or it is not a midinette does not hold.; int14 & sent18 -> int15: the wrymouth is meteoric.; sent25 & int15 -> int16: the Aegyptopithecus does not better nomogram.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it betters nomogram is false.; int17 & sent11 -> int18: the illustrator weeds crowberry and is not a megalosaur.; int18 -> int19: something weeds crowberry and is not a megalosaur.;
$hypothesis$ = the vacuole does not resist. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a hopefulness but it is a Garfield it does not resist. sent2: the ringlet is not a Garfield and does resist if the illustrator is not a hopefulness. sent3: if the illustrator is a megalosaur then it is a kind of a wilderness. sent4: the illustrator is not a aliquant if the ringlet is not intrusive. sent5: something is a hopefulness. sent6: if something is a wilderness it is not intrusive and it is not a aliquant. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a hopefulness. sent8: the polygraph is not a photon if there exists something such that it is not operable. sent9: the darner is not operable. sent10: the illustrator is not a kind of a aliquant if the ringlet is not orthoptic. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not better nomogram then the illustrator does weed crowberry but it is not a megalosaur. sent12: the polygraph does not depressurize. sent13: if that the ringlet is not a aliquant and is not orthoptic does not hold then the elephant is not orthoptic. sent14: if that something is not a Garfield hold then it does resist and is a hopefulness. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Garfield it is not intrusive or it is not orthoptic or both. sent16: the leaf is not cyprian. sent17: if the fact that there is something such that it is not a kind of a aliquant is not false then the vacuole does not resist. sent18: the wrymouth is meteoric if there exists something such that the fact that either it is not antitypic or it is not a midinette or both is not correct. sent19: if the illustrator is a wilderness then it is intrusive. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is a aliquant is not incorrect. sent21: if something is not a hopefulness the ringlet is not a Garfield. sent22: the fact that something is a kind of a Garfield and it is orthoptic is incorrect if it is not intrusive. sent23: if that the nomogram does not depressurize is correct the fact that it is not antitypic or it is not a kind of a midinette or both is not correct. sent24: the vacuole does not better Cicadidae and/or is not a savage. sent25: the Aegyptopithecus does not better nomogram if the wrymouth is meteoric. sent26: the nomogram does not depressurize if the polygraph is not a photon and does not depressurize. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent21 -> int1: the ringlet is not a Garfield.; sent15 -> int2: if the ringlet is not a Garfield then it is not intrusive or it is non-orthoptic or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ringlet is either not intrusive or not orthoptic or both.; int3 & sent4 & sent10 -> int4: the illustrator is not a kind of a aliquant.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a aliquant.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__