the compacting Lamium does not occur.
sent1: the valency does not occur if the fact that the Independence does not occur and the intermediate does not occur is not true. sent2: if the fact that both the valency and the compacting Lamium happens is not true then the compacting Lamium does not occur. sent3: the investigating nightlife happens if not the first but the placentalness occurs. sent4: the counterpunch happens if the Independence occurs and the intermediate does not occur. sent5: the compacting Lamium is caused by that the expostulation occurs. sent6: that both the Independence and the non-intermediateness happens is not correct. sent7: if the Independence does not occur and the intermediateness does not occur then the counterpunch occurs. sent8: that the nasopharyngealness happens is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the Independence does not occur and the intermediate happens is incorrect. sent10: that the counterpunch happens prevents that the expostulation does not occur. sent11: the compacting iamb happens. sent12: the valency happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Independence does not occur and the intermediate does not occur is not right.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the valency does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Independence does not occur and the intermediateness does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the counterpunch occurs.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the expostulation happens.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the compacting Lamium does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the compacting Lamium does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the valency does not occur if the fact that the Independence does not occur and the intermediate does not occur is not true. sent2: if the fact that both the valency and the compacting Lamium happens is not true then the compacting Lamium does not occur. sent3: the investigating nightlife happens if not the first but the placentalness occurs. sent4: the counterpunch happens if the Independence occurs and the intermediate does not occur. sent5: the compacting Lamium is caused by that the expostulation occurs. sent6: that both the Independence and the non-intermediateness happens is not correct. sent7: if the Independence does not occur and the intermediateness does not occur then the counterpunch occurs. sent8: that the nasopharyngealness happens is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the Independence does not occur and the intermediate happens is incorrect. sent10: that the counterpunch happens prevents that the expostulation does not occur. sent11: the compacting iamb happens. sent12: the valency happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Independence does not occur and the intermediate does not occur is not right.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the valency does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Independence does not occur and the intermediateness does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the counterpunch occurs.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the expostulation happens.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__