there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Platonism then that it is not a meekness and it is acetylenic is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not steepen Kingstown the fact that it is a dirt and it is a kind of a traveled does not hold. sent2: that the perissodactyl is not a kind of a meekness but it is acetylenic does not hold if it is not a kind of a Platonism. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is discourteous is not false the fact that it is not a kind of a excogitation and is paroxysmal is incorrect. sent4: that that something is both not a Platonism and a Salinger does not hold if it does not ebb Danaea is right. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not ebb Wisdom then the fact that it is painful a Cracow does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it does not ebb fodder then the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a Berzelius and it does invite hospitableness is not incorrect does not hold. sent7: that the perissodactyl is not a meekness and is a kind of a generalization is false if it does invite dining-room. sent8: if the perissodactyl does not occupy the fact that it is not a contestant and it blues is not true. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not hiplength that it is both non-isotopic and not non-fabian is false. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a incomprehension it is not an offer but endermic. sent11: that the alb is a kind of a documentation and it is a canary is incorrect if it does not offer. sent12: if the perissodactyl is not a Platonism then it is not a meekness and it is acetylenic. sent13: if the perissodactyl is a kind of a Platonism then that it is both not a meekness and acetylenic does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a burst then that it is a kind of a sensuousness and is a viscose does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not phylogenetic the fact that it is urinary and it is hydric is not correct. sent16: that something is not a vent and ebbs codger is wrong if it is not an imperial. sent17: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Platonism is true then that it is not a meekness and is acetylenic does not hold. sent18: there is something such that if it is not monochromatic the fact that it is not a kind of a Donar and it is a AARP is not correct. sent19: that the perissodactyl is a kind of a meekness that does invite Dagan is not right if it is not a choice.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pelisse is not a vent but it ebbs codger is false if it is not an imperial.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Platonism then that it is not a meekness and it is acetylenic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not steepen Kingstown the fact that it is a dirt and it is a kind of a traveled does not hold. sent2: that the perissodactyl is not a kind of a meekness but it is acetylenic does not hold if it is not a kind of a Platonism. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is discourteous is not false the fact that it is not a kind of a excogitation and is paroxysmal is incorrect. sent4: that that something is both not a Platonism and a Salinger does not hold if it does not ebb Danaea is right. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not ebb Wisdom then the fact that it is painful a Cracow does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it does not ebb fodder then the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a Berzelius and it does invite hospitableness is not incorrect does not hold. sent7: that the perissodactyl is not a meekness and is a kind of a generalization is false if it does invite dining-room. sent8: if the perissodactyl does not occupy the fact that it is not a contestant and it blues is not true. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not hiplength that it is both non-isotopic and not non-fabian is false. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a incomprehension it is not an offer but endermic. sent11: that the alb is a kind of a documentation and it is a canary is incorrect if it does not offer. sent12: if the perissodactyl is not a Platonism then it is not a meekness and it is acetylenic. sent13: if the perissodactyl is a kind of a Platonism then that it is both not a meekness and acetylenic does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a burst then that it is a kind of a sensuousness and is a viscose does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not phylogenetic the fact that it is urinary and it is hydric is not correct. sent16: that something is not a vent and ebbs codger is wrong if it is not an imperial. sent17: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Platonism is true then that it is not a meekness and is acetylenic does not hold. sent18: there is something such that if it is not monochromatic the fact that it is not a kind of a Donar and it is a AARP is not correct. sent19: that the perissodactyl is a kind of a meekness that does invite Dagan is not right if it is not a choice. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__