the tot is not dissuasive.
sent1: the Malathion is not a Baku if it is not dissuasive and does not headquarter zinc. sent2: The indecorum does headquarter Malathion. sent3: the Malathion does headquarter indecorum. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not ding odist and is not a kind of a Seattle does not hold. sent5: if that the tot does headquarter zinc but it is non-dissuasive does not hold the Malathion is a kind of a Baku. sent6: the fact that the Malathion is not a kind of a Fijian is not wrong. sent7: that the tot does headquarter zinc is not false. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of non-Fijian thing that does not headquarter Coigue is not true if it does not headquarter indecorum. sent9: something is accommodational if it is a Baku. sent10: if the Malathion headquarters indecorum it is non-Fijian thing that does not headquarter Coigue. sent11: the tot is not Fijian if it is not accommodational and does not headquarter zinc. sent12: if that the eggar does headquarter Coigue is correct then the Malathion is not a Baku and it is not a kind of a Fijian. sent13: if the Malathion is non-Fijian thing that does not headquarter Coigue then it is not accommodational.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tot headquarters zinc and is not dissuasive is incorrect.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the Malathion is a Baku.; sent9 -> int2: if the Malathion is a kind of a Baku it is accommodational.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Malathion is accommodational.; sent10 & sent3 -> int4: the Malathion is not Fijian and it does not headquarter Coigue.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the Malathion is not accommodational.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the tot headquarters zinc and is not dissuasive.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the odist is accommodational but it is not whiting is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the tot is not dissuasive. ; $context$ = sent1: the Malathion is not a Baku if it is not dissuasive and does not headquarter zinc. sent2: The indecorum does headquarter Malathion. sent3: the Malathion does headquarter indecorum. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not ding odist and is not a kind of a Seattle does not hold. sent5: if that the tot does headquarter zinc but it is non-dissuasive does not hold the Malathion is a kind of a Baku. sent6: the fact that the Malathion is not a kind of a Fijian is not wrong. sent7: that the tot does headquarter zinc is not false. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of non-Fijian thing that does not headquarter Coigue is not true if it does not headquarter indecorum. sent9: something is accommodational if it is a Baku. sent10: if the Malathion headquarters indecorum it is non-Fijian thing that does not headquarter Coigue. sent11: the tot is not Fijian if it is not accommodational and does not headquarter zinc. sent12: if that the eggar does headquarter Coigue is correct then the Malathion is not a Baku and it is not a kind of a Fijian. sent13: if the Malathion is non-Fijian thing that does not headquarter Coigue then it is not accommodational. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tot headquarters zinc and is not dissuasive is incorrect.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the Malathion is a Baku.; sent9 -> int2: if the Malathion is a kind of a Baku it is accommodational.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Malathion is accommodational.; sent10 & sent3 -> int4: the Malathion is not Fijian and it does not headquarter Coigue.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the Malathion is not accommodational.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the tot headquarters zinc and is not dissuasive.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__