the fact that the communication does not occur is true.
sent1: if the communication happens then the corinthianness occurs. sent2: that the nonmonotonicness happens prevents that the denouement happens. sent3: that the fooling sameness occurs is caused by that not the denouement but the cockfighting occurs. sent4: the tamedness happens. sent5: the opticalness does not occur. sent6: the denouement is prevented by either that the talking shocker occurs or that the nonmonotonicness occurs or both. sent7: if the opticalness does not occur then the blaming homology does not occur. sent8: the talking waters occurs and/or the Monophysite occurs. sent9: that if the opticalness does not occur then the fooling sameness does not occur and the blaming homology does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: both the cockfighting and the tamedness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the communication happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the corinthianness happens is correct.; sent10 -> int2: the cockfighting happens.; sent9 & sent5 -> int3: the fooling sameness does not occur and the blaming homology does not occur.; int3 -> int4: that the fooling sameness does not occur is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the communication does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the communication happens then the corinthianness occurs. sent2: that the nonmonotonicness happens prevents that the denouement happens. sent3: that the fooling sameness occurs is caused by that not the denouement but the cockfighting occurs. sent4: the tamedness happens. sent5: the opticalness does not occur. sent6: the denouement is prevented by either that the talking shocker occurs or that the nonmonotonicness occurs or both. sent7: if the opticalness does not occur then the blaming homology does not occur. sent8: the talking waters occurs and/or the Monophysite occurs. sent9: that if the opticalness does not occur then the fooling sameness does not occur and the blaming homology does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: both the cockfighting and the tamedness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the communication happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the corinthianness happens is correct.; sent10 -> int2: the cockfighting happens.; sent9 & sent5 -> int3: the fooling sameness does not occur and the blaming homology does not occur.; int3 -> int4: that the fooling sameness does not occur is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__