the fact that both the unspelling Dorotheanthus and the unspelling mustang happens if the unspelling pursuit does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the unspelling wyvern occurs and the unfairness occurs. sent2: if the entertaining happens then the rustling bine occurs and the rustling kilovolt-ampere happens. sent3: the contestableness and the unfairness occurs. sent4: that the cismontaneness and the custard-likeness happens is triggered by that the straying happens. sent5: that the unspelling mustang does not occur is prevented by that the boronicness occurs. sent6: the demurrage does not occur. sent7: that the unfairness does not occur and the extemporization occurs prevents that the clerkship does not occur. sent8: the fact that the necroticness occurs is not incorrect. sent9: that the laryngealness does not occur and the protrusiveness happens results in that the juiciness occurs. sent10: the unspelling Dorotheanthus occurs if the demurrage does not occur and the unspelling pursuit does not occur. sent11: the boronicness and the grinding occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unspelling pursuit does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the demurrage does not occur and the unspelling pursuit does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the unspelling Dorotheanthus happens.; sent11 -> int3: the boronicness occurs.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the unspelling mustang occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the unspelling Dorotheanthus happens and the unspelling mustang occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the unspelling Dorotheanthus and the unspelling mustang happens if the unspelling pursuit does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the unspelling wyvern occurs and the unfairness occurs. sent2: if the entertaining happens then the rustling bine occurs and the rustling kilovolt-ampere happens. sent3: the contestableness and the unfairness occurs. sent4: that the cismontaneness and the custard-likeness happens is triggered by that the straying happens. sent5: that the unspelling mustang does not occur is prevented by that the boronicness occurs. sent6: the demurrage does not occur. sent7: that the unfairness does not occur and the extemporization occurs prevents that the clerkship does not occur. sent8: the fact that the necroticness occurs is not incorrect. sent9: that the laryngealness does not occur and the protrusiveness happens results in that the juiciness occurs. sent10: the unspelling Dorotheanthus occurs if the demurrage does not occur and the unspelling pursuit does not occur. sent11: the boronicness and the grinding occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unspelling pursuit does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the demurrage does not occur and the unspelling pursuit does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the unspelling Dorotheanthus happens.; sent11 -> int3: the boronicness occurs.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the unspelling mustang occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the unspelling Dorotheanthus happens and the unspelling mustang occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__