the prang occurs.
sent1: the prang happens if the meaning homeowner occurs. sent2: the fact that the non-chaffiness and the dinging Gibran happens does not hold if the unrhetoricalness does not occur. sent3: the unrhetoricalness does not occur if that the binariness and the unsavoriness occurs is not right. sent4: that the unrhetoricalness and the dinging Gibran occurs is brought about by the savoryness. sent5: if the nominalisticness does not occur the fact that both the binariness and the unsavoriness happens is not true. sent6: the meaning homeowner does not occur. sent7: the onomatopoeicness does not occur if the fact that the fact that the radiophotography but not the affair occurs is not wrong is not correct. sent8: the cover-up occurs but the imparting Stizostedion does not occur if the onomatopoeicness does not occur. sent9: if the bicapsularness does not occur the fact that the fact that the volatile does not occur and the sleeping instep does not occur does not hold is not false. sent10: if the fact that either the escalating happens or the meaning homeowner does not occur or both is not correct then that the imparting superhet does not occur is correct. sent11: the stigmaticness does not occur if the meaning piracy but not the meaning skua occurs. sent12: the fact that both the chaffiness and the dinging Gibran occurs is true. sent13: that the pranging does not occur hold if not the escalating but the feat happens. sent14: that the meaning homeowner does not occur triggers that the sleeping downtick does not occur and the dinging Hasidim does not occur. sent15: the meaning piracy but not the meaning skua happens if the imparting Stizostedion does not occur. sent16: both the non-onomatopoeicness and the non-alabasterness happens if the cryocautery does not occur. sent17: the non-nominalisticness brings about that both the non-unsavoriness and the non-binaryness happens. sent18: if that that the volatile does not occur and the sleeping instep does not occur is correct is not right then the nominalisticness does not occur. sent19: the bicapsularness does not occur if the stigmatic does not occur. sent20: the chaffiness results in that the feat occurs. sent21: if the sleeping downtick does not occur and the dinging Hasidim does not occur the escalating does not occur. sent22: the dinging Hasidim does not occur.
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the sleeping downtick does not occur and the dinging Hasidim does not occur.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the escalating does not occur.; sent12 -> int3: the chaffiness occurs.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the feat occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: not the escalating but the feat happens.; int5 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the prang happens is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the prang occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the prang happens if the meaning homeowner occurs. sent2: the fact that the non-chaffiness and the dinging Gibran happens does not hold if the unrhetoricalness does not occur. sent3: the unrhetoricalness does not occur if that the binariness and the unsavoriness occurs is not right. sent4: that the unrhetoricalness and the dinging Gibran occurs is brought about by the savoryness. sent5: if the nominalisticness does not occur the fact that both the binariness and the unsavoriness happens is not true. sent6: the meaning homeowner does not occur. sent7: the onomatopoeicness does not occur if the fact that the fact that the radiophotography but not the affair occurs is not wrong is not correct. sent8: the cover-up occurs but the imparting Stizostedion does not occur if the onomatopoeicness does not occur. sent9: if the bicapsularness does not occur the fact that the fact that the volatile does not occur and the sleeping instep does not occur does not hold is not false. sent10: if the fact that either the escalating happens or the meaning homeowner does not occur or both is not correct then that the imparting superhet does not occur is correct. sent11: the stigmaticness does not occur if the meaning piracy but not the meaning skua occurs. sent12: the fact that both the chaffiness and the dinging Gibran occurs is true. sent13: that the pranging does not occur hold if not the escalating but the feat happens. sent14: that the meaning homeowner does not occur triggers that the sleeping downtick does not occur and the dinging Hasidim does not occur. sent15: the meaning piracy but not the meaning skua happens if the imparting Stizostedion does not occur. sent16: both the non-onomatopoeicness and the non-alabasterness happens if the cryocautery does not occur. sent17: the non-nominalisticness brings about that both the non-unsavoriness and the non-binaryness happens. sent18: if that that the volatile does not occur and the sleeping instep does not occur is correct is not right then the nominalisticness does not occur. sent19: the bicapsularness does not occur if the stigmatic does not occur. sent20: the chaffiness results in that the feat occurs. sent21: if the sleeping downtick does not occur and the dinging Hasidim does not occur the escalating does not occur. sent22: the dinging Hasidim does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the sleeping downtick does not occur and the dinging Hasidim does not occur.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the escalating does not occur.; sent12 -> int3: the chaffiness occurs.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the feat occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: not the escalating but the feat happens.; int5 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__