the activation does not occur.
sent1: the fact that if the effacing floxuridine happens the fact that the clip-clop happens hold is right. sent2: that either the clip-clop occurs or the aesculapianness does not occur or both is brought about by that the commerce does not occur. sent3: the clip-clop or the non-aesculapianness or both brings about the aesculapiannessness. sent4: if that the effacing floxuridine but not the slippage happens is wrong then the fact that the commerce does not occur is not false. sent5: that the activation and the roofing Wesleyan occurs is caused by the violentness. sent6: if the roofing Wesleyan does not occur that both the non-systolicness and the non-aesculapianness occurs does not hold. sent7: that the fact that the dallying does not occur and the focalness happens hold is incorrect if the dissuasion does not occur. sent8: the effacing guitar occurs if the clip-clop happens. sent9: the activation does not occur if the fact that the commerce happens is correct. sent10: that the aerosol happens leads to that the roofing repercussion occurs. sent11: that the Mormonsness does not occur is not wrong if that the Mormonsness happens but the cut-in does not occur is not right. sent12: that the Mormonsness but not the cut-in occurs is incorrect if the vice-presidentialness does not occur. sent13: the commerce occurs if the aesculapianness happens. sent14: the nonviolentness occurs. sent15: if the roofing Wesleyan and the nonviolentness happens the effacing guitar does not occur. sent16: that the effacing floxuridine but not the slippage happens is incorrect if the Mormons does not occur. sent17: the effacing floxuridine occurs. sent18: if the calvary occurs not the vice-presidentialness but the administering happens. sent19: that the non-systolicness and the aesculapianness happens is not right. sent20: if that the aerosol does not occur and the congregationalness does not occur is not correct that the extricableness happens is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roofing Wesleyan occurs.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: both the roofing Wesleyan and the nonviolentness happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the effacing guitar does not occur.; sent1 & sent17 -> int3: the clip-clop happens.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the effacing guitar occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the roofing Wesleyan does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that both the non-systolicness and the non-aesculapianness happens is incorrect.;
the activation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the activation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the effacing floxuridine happens the fact that the clip-clop happens hold is right. sent2: that either the clip-clop occurs or the aesculapianness does not occur or both is brought about by that the commerce does not occur. sent3: the clip-clop or the non-aesculapianness or both brings about the aesculapiannessness. sent4: if that the effacing floxuridine but not the slippage happens is wrong then the fact that the commerce does not occur is not false. sent5: that the activation and the roofing Wesleyan occurs is caused by the violentness. sent6: if the roofing Wesleyan does not occur that both the non-systolicness and the non-aesculapianness occurs does not hold. sent7: that the fact that the dallying does not occur and the focalness happens hold is incorrect if the dissuasion does not occur. sent8: the effacing guitar occurs if the clip-clop happens. sent9: the activation does not occur if the fact that the commerce happens is correct. sent10: that the aerosol happens leads to that the roofing repercussion occurs. sent11: that the Mormonsness does not occur is not wrong if that the Mormonsness happens but the cut-in does not occur is not right. sent12: that the Mormonsness but not the cut-in occurs is incorrect if the vice-presidentialness does not occur. sent13: the commerce occurs if the aesculapianness happens. sent14: the nonviolentness occurs. sent15: if the roofing Wesleyan and the nonviolentness happens the effacing guitar does not occur. sent16: that the effacing floxuridine but not the slippage happens is incorrect if the Mormons does not occur. sent17: the effacing floxuridine occurs. sent18: if the calvary occurs not the vice-presidentialness but the administering happens. sent19: that the non-systolicness and the aesculapianness happens is not right. sent20: if that the aerosol does not occur and the congregationalness does not occur is not correct that the extricableness happens is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roofing Wesleyan occurs.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: both the roofing Wesleyan and the nonviolentness happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the effacing guitar does not occur.; sent1 & sent17 -> int3: the clip-clop happens.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the effacing guitar occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the roofing Wesleyan does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that both the non-systolicness and the non-aesculapianness happens is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__