the greensness does not occur.
sent1: that the stapling monologist and the acronymicness happens is caused by the non-glovelessness. sent2: if that the dogmatizing Victorian happens but the anthropometry does not occur is not true the dogmatizing Victorian does not occur. sent3: the bunking gassing occurs if the adenoidness occurs. sent4: the stapling theory does not occur if the medevac does not occur but the blockade occurs. sent5: not the glovelessness but the dogmatizing Victorian occurs. sent6: that the stapling propriety occurs and the palatopharyngoplasty happens causes that the working does not occur. sent7: the medevac does not occur. sent8: that the bunking gassing and the greensness happens prevents that the stapling monologist happens. sent9: both the non-narrowedness and the unfreeness occurs if the stapling theory does not occur. sent10: if the domesticity does not occur then that the dogmatizing Victorian happens and the anthropometry does not occur does not hold. sent11: the glovelessness and the non-acronymicness happens if the dogmatizing Victorian does not occur. sent12: the acronymicness occurs if the glovelessness does not occur. sent13: if both the backstop and the non-adenoidness occurs then the adjectiveness occurs. sent14: the acronymicness happens. sent15: if the greens does not occur and the stapling monologist does not occur the bunking gassing does not occur. sent16: if that the superiorness does not occur is not wrong then the domesticity does not occur and the acquainting breadstuff does not occur. sent17: if the narrowing does not occur the non-superiorness and the non-mesoblasticness occurs. sent18: if the acronymicness does not occur then the greensness does not occur and the stapling monologist does not occur. sent19: the dogmatizing Victorian happens. sent20: the bunking gassing occurs if the backstop happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the greening happens.; sent5 -> int1: the glovelessness does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the stapling monologist and the acronymicness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the stapling monologist occurs.;
that the adjective happens is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the greensness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the stapling monologist and the acronymicness happens is caused by the non-glovelessness. sent2: if that the dogmatizing Victorian happens but the anthropometry does not occur is not true the dogmatizing Victorian does not occur. sent3: the bunking gassing occurs if the adenoidness occurs. sent4: the stapling theory does not occur if the medevac does not occur but the blockade occurs. sent5: not the glovelessness but the dogmatizing Victorian occurs. sent6: that the stapling propriety occurs and the palatopharyngoplasty happens causes that the working does not occur. sent7: the medevac does not occur. sent8: that the bunking gassing and the greensness happens prevents that the stapling monologist happens. sent9: both the non-narrowedness and the unfreeness occurs if the stapling theory does not occur. sent10: if the domesticity does not occur then that the dogmatizing Victorian happens and the anthropometry does not occur does not hold. sent11: the glovelessness and the non-acronymicness happens if the dogmatizing Victorian does not occur. sent12: the acronymicness occurs if the glovelessness does not occur. sent13: if both the backstop and the non-adenoidness occurs then the adjectiveness occurs. sent14: the acronymicness happens. sent15: if the greens does not occur and the stapling monologist does not occur the bunking gassing does not occur. sent16: if that the superiorness does not occur is not wrong then the domesticity does not occur and the acquainting breadstuff does not occur. sent17: if the narrowing does not occur the non-superiorness and the non-mesoblasticness occurs. sent18: if the acronymicness does not occur then the greensness does not occur and the stapling monologist does not occur. sent19: the dogmatizing Victorian happens. sent20: the bunking gassing occurs if the backstop happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the greening happens.; sent5 -> int1: the glovelessness does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the stapling monologist and the acronymicness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the stapling monologist occurs.; __UNKNOWN__