that the grass is not tetragonal if the seriema is not indestructible is not correct.
sent1: if the geezer is a Fula then the seriema is indestructible. sent2: the fact that something is both not a Agelaius and a Fula is not right if the fact that it does not deflower glioma is correct. sent3: that the grass does not deflower glioma and it is not a kind of an empiricism is not right if the geezer deflower glioma. sent4: that something does not jacket seriema and is not considerable is false if the fact that it does not swallow is right. sent5: the grass is a Isfahan. sent6: the grass is not tetragonal if that it does not deflower glioma and is not a kind of an empiricism does not hold. sent7: that the geezer is not an empiricism and is not a Fula is not true if it is not indestructible. sent8: if the seriema is indestructible the grass is not tetragonal. sent9: if the seriema is unfruitful the fact that it is not tetragonal and it is not an empiricism does not hold. sent10: if the geezer does not deflower glioma the fact that it is not a Agelaius and it is a Fula is false. sent11: if the seriema is an empiricism the rind is not indestructible and does not deflower glioma. sent12: the fact that the grass deflowers glioma but it is not a kind of an empiricism is not correct. sent13: the fact that the grass does not deflower glioma but it is a kind of an empiricism is not correct. sent14: the fact that the grass does deflower glioma but it is not a kind of an empiricism does not hold if the geezer does deflower glioma. sent15: the grass is not a kind of a contraindication. sent16: the grass is a Fula. sent17: that the grass is tetragonal is not false if the fact that it does not deflower glioma and it is not an empiricism is false. sent18: if that the geezer is not a Agelaius and it is not a kind of a Fula is incorrect the seriema is indestructible. sent19: if the geezer does deflower glioma then that the grass does not deflower glioma and is an empiricism is not true. sent20: that the geezer is not a Agelaius but it is a Fula does not hold. sent21: if the seriema is not indestructible then the grass is not non-tetragonal. sent22: if something does not deflower glioma that it is not a kind of a Agelaius and it is not a Fula is wrong.
sent22 -> int1: if the geezer does not deflower glioma the fact that it is not a Agelaius and it is not a Fula is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the geezer does not deflower glioma.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the fact that the geezer is not a Agelaius and it is not a Fula is not incorrect is false.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: that the seriema is indestructible is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the seriema is not indestructible.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the geezer does deflower glioma.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that that the grass does not deflower glioma and it is not an empiricism is not wrong is wrong.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the grass is not tetragonal.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the rind is not indestructible.
sent5 -> int8: something is a Isfahan.;
$hypothesis$ = that the grass is not tetragonal if the seriema is not indestructible is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the geezer is a Fula then the seriema is indestructible. sent2: the fact that something is both not a Agelaius and a Fula is not right if the fact that it does not deflower glioma is correct. sent3: that the grass does not deflower glioma and it is not a kind of an empiricism is not right if the geezer deflower glioma. sent4: that something does not jacket seriema and is not considerable is false if the fact that it does not swallow is right. sent5: the grass is a Isfahan. sent6: the grass is not tetragonal if that it does not deflower glioma and is not a kind of an empiricism does not hold. sent7: that the geezer is not an empiricism and is not a Fula is not true if it is not indestructible. sent8: if the seriema is indestructible the grass is not tetragonal. sent9: if the seriema is unfruitful the fact that it is not tetragonal and it is not an empiricism does not hold. sent10: if the geezer does not deflower glioma the fact that it is not a Agelaius and it is a Fula is false. sent11: if the seriema is an empiricism the rind is not indestructible and does not deflower glioma. sent12: the fact that the grass deflowers glioma but it is not a kind of an empiricism is not correct. sent13: the fact that the grass does not deflower glioma but it is a kind of an empiricism is not correct. sent14: the fact that the grass does deflower glioma but it is not a kind of an empiricism does not hold if the geezer does deflower glioma. sent15: the grass is not a kind of a contraindication. sent16: the grass is a Fula. sent17: that the grass is tetragonal is not false if the fact that it does not deflower glioma and it is not an empiricism is false. sent18: if that the geezer is not a Agelaius and it is not a kind of a Fula is incorrect the seriema is indestructible. sent19: if the geezer does deflower glioma then that the grass does not deflower glioma and is an empiricism is not true. sent20: that the geezer is not a Agelaius but it is a Fula does not hold. sent21: if the seriema is not indestructible then the grass is not non-tetragonal. sent22: if something does not deflower glioma that it is not a kind of a Agelaius and it is not a Fula is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: if the geezer does not deflower glioma the fact that it is not a Agelaius and it is not a Fula is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the geezer does not deflower glioma.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the fact that the geezer is not a Agelaius and it is not a Fula is not incorrect is false.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: that the seriema is indestructible is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the seriema is not indestructible.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the geezer does deflower glioma.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that that the grass does not deflower glioma and it is not an empiricism is not wrong is wrong.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the grass is not tetragonal.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__