the amoristicness occurs.
sent1: if the burping and the suffixation occurs then the frying quira does not occur. sent2: the frying quira occurs. sent3: the eviscerating spritzer does not occur if the burping does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the topographicalness does not occur or the searching does not occur or both is false then the demur does not occur. sent5: if that both the demurring and the search occurs is false then the amoristicness does not occur. sent6: if the demurring does not occur then the eviscerating spritzer and the staging Permalloy happens. sent7: the suffixation occurs. sent8: if the eviscerating spritzer does not occur then the fact that the staging Permalloy does not occur is right. sent9: that both the demur and the searching occurs is not true if the fact that the staging Permalloy does not occur hold. sent10: that the amoristicness does not occur is right if that the demurring does not occur is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the burping happens is correct.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the burping and the suffixation happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the frying quira does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the burping does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the eviscerating spritzer does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the staging Permalloy does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the demur happens and the search occurs is not true.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the amoristicness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the amoristicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burping and the suffixation occurs then the frying quira does not occur. sent2: the frying quira occurs. sent3: the eviscerating spritzer does not occur if the burping does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the topographicalness does not occur or the searching does not occur or both is false then the demur does not occur. sent5: if that both the demurring and the search occurs is false then the amoristicness does not occur. sent6: if the demurring does not occur then the eviscerating spritzer and the staging Permalloy happens. sent7: the suffixation occurs. sent8: if the eviscerating spritzer does not occur then the fact that the staging Permalloy does not occur is right. sent9: that both the demur and the searching occurs is not true if the fact that the staging Permalloy does not occur hold. sent10: that the amoristicness does not occur is right if that the demurring does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the burping happens is correct.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the burping and the suffixation happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the frying quira does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the burping does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the eviscerating spritzer does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the staging Permalloy does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the demur happens and the search occurs is not true.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__