there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Ofo that it is an outfield and does not blacklist Fabiana is incorrect.
sent1: if the cameraman is a kind of an outfield and does not blacklist Fabiana then it is a Ofo. sent2: the fact that something is a platter but not erythropoietic is not correct if it is an oxygen. sent3: that the mugwort is apophatic but it is not a Astacus is not right. sent4: if the cameraman is an outfield but it does not blacklist Fabiana it is not a Ofo.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cameraman is a kind of an outfield that does not blacklist Fabiana.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the cameraman is not a Ofo.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cameraman is a Ofo.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the cameraman is an outfield but it does not blacklist Fabiana does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the cameraman is an outfield but it does not blacklist Fabiana does not hold if it is a kind of a Ofo.; int4 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is an oxygen that it is a kind of a platter that is not erythropoietic is not correct.
sent2 -> int5: if the cameraman is an oxygen that it is a platter and it is not erythropoietic is false.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Ofo that it is an outfield and does not blacklist Fabiana is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cameraman is a kind of an outfield and does not blacklist Fabiana then it is a Ofo. sent2: the fact that something is a platter but not erythropoietic is not correct if it is an oxygen. sent3: that the mugwort is apophatic but it is not a Astacus is not right. sent4: if the cameraman is an outfield but it does not blacklist Fabiana it is not a Ofo. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cameraman is a kind of an outfield that does not blacklist Fabiana.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the cameraman is not a Ofo.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cameraman is a Ofo.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the cameraman is an outfield but it does not blacklist Fabiana does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the cameraman is an outfield but it does not blacklist Fabiana does not hold if it is a kind of a Ofo.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__