the phaeton incarnates.
sent1: the difflugia is a kind of a pillar if there exists something such that it is not a embolectomy. sent2: the nadir is not characteristic. sent3: if something maintains alienator but it is not a bhang then the floxuridine does not demagnetize sepal. sent4: if the floxuridine does not demagnetize sepal the fact that the sepal does not demagnetize sepal and does not suckle downpour does not hold. sent5: the difflugia is not a pillar if that the sepal does not demagnetize sepal and it does not suckle downpour is not right. sent6: if something is not a characteristic and/or is not a embolectomy then it is not a embolectomy. sent7: if the fact that something is not a creditor is correct it maintains alienator and is not a kind of a bhang.
sent7 -> int1: the quarreler does maintain alienator and is not a bhang if it is not a creditor.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quarreler is not a kind of a creditor.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the quarreler does maintain alienator and is not a kind of a bhang.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does maintain alienator and it is not a bhang.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the floxuridine does not demagnetize sepal is not incorrect.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: that the sepal does not demagnetize sepal and does not suckle downpour is not correct.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the difflugia is not a pillar.; sent6 -> int7: if the nadir either is not a kind of a characteristic or is not a embolectomy or both it is not a embolectomy.; sent2 -> int8: the nadir is uncharacteristic and/or it is not a embolectomy.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the nadir is not a embolectomy.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a embolectomy.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the difflugia is a pillar.; int6 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> int13: the quarreler is a creditor.;
$hypothesis$ = the phaeton incarnates. ; $context$ = sent1: the difflugia is a kind of a pillar if there exists something such that it is not a embolectomy. sent2: the nadir is not characteristic. sent3: if something maintains alienator but it is not a bhang then the floxuridine does not demagnetize sepal. sent4: if the floxuridine does not demagnetize sepal the fact that the sepal does not demagnetize sepal and does not suckle downpour does not hold. sent5: the difflugia is not a pillar if that the sepal does not demagnetize sepal and it does not suckle downpour is not right. sent6: if something is not a characteristic and/or is not a embolectomy then it is not a embolectomy. sent7: if the fact that something is not a creditor is correct it maintains alienator and is not a kind of a bhang. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the quarreler does maintain alienator and is not a bhang if it is not a creditor.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quarreler is not a kind of a creditor.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the quarreler does maintain alienator and is not a kind of a bhang.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does maintain alienator and it is not a bhang.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the floxuridine does not demagnetize sepal is not incorrect.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: that the sepal does not demagnetize sepal and does not suckle downpour is not correct.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the difflugia is not a pillar.; sent6 -> int7: if the nadir either is not a kind of a characteristic or is not a embolectomy or both it is not a embolectomy.; sent2 -> int8: the nadir is uncharacteristic and/or it is not a embolectomy.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the nadir is not a embolectomy.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a embolectomy.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the difflugia is a pillar.; int6 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> int13: the quarreler is a creditor.; __UNKNOWN__