the ninon does not debrief State.
sent1: if that the fact that the ninon is both not a racketeering and unitary is not wrong is not right it is not trustworthy. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Palatine or it is a kind of a pantechnicon or both is incorrect. sent3: if a MKO is a kind of a thumbhole then the ninon does debrief State. sent4: the blush is a thumbhole. sent5: the fact that if something does not debrief Edgar then the blush does debrief State or it is a pedantry or both is correct. sent6: an untrustworthy thing does not amplify pallone or is a antipyretic or both. sent7: the shelter does not debrief State if the blush does debrief State. sent8: if there is something such that that it is suburban and is adroit is incorrect the neurologist is not unitary. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Palatine and/or is a pantechnicon is incorrect the blush is a kind of a MKO. sent10: if the blush is a pedantry then the shelter does not debrief State. sent11: something that does not amplify pallone and/or is a kind of a antipyretic does not debrief Edgar. sent12: the fact that the antiaircraft is suburban and it is adroit is not true if the alchemist is not a kind of a broke. sent13: that the alchemist is not a broke is right. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Palatine and/or is a kind of a pantechnicon does not hold. sent15: the fact that the ninon is not a kind of a racketeering but it is unitary is not right if there is something such that it is not unitary.
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the blush is a MKO.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the blush is a MKO that is a thumbhole.; int2 -> int3: that there is something such that it is a MKO and is a kind of a thumbhole is not false.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the shelter is a MKO.
sent11 -> int4: if the ninon does not amplify pallone or it is a antipyretic or both the fact that it does not debrief Edgar hold.; sent6 -> int5: if the ninon is not trustworthy it does not amplify pallone or is a antipyretic or both.; sent12 & sent13 -> int6: the fact that the antiaircraft is suburban and is adroit is false.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is suburban and adroit is not right.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the neurologist is not unitary.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is non-unitary.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: that the ninon does not racketeer but it is unitary is not right.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the ninon is untrustworthy.; int5 & int11 -> int12: the ninon does not amplify pallone and/or it is a antipyretic.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the ninon does not debrief Edgar.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it does not debrief Edgar.; int14 & sent5 -> int15: either the blush does debrief State or it is a pedantry or both.; int15 & sent7 & sent10 -> int16: the fact that the shelter does not debrief State hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the ninon does not debrief State. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the fact that the ninon is both not a racketeering and unitary is not wrong is not right it is not trustworthy. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Palatine or it is a kind of a pantechnicon or both is incorrect. sent3: if a MKO is a kind of a thumbhole then the ninon does debrief State. sent4: the blush is a thumbhole. sent5: the fact that if something does not debrief Edgar then the blush does debrief State or it is a pedantry or both is correct. sent6: an untrustworthy thing does not amplify pallone or is a antipyretic or both. sent7: the shelter does not debrief State if the blush does debrief State. sent8: if there is something such that that it is suburban and is adroit is incorrect the neurologist is not unitary. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Palatine and/or is a pantechnicon is incorrect the blush is a kind of a MKO. sent10: if the blush is a pedantry then the shelter does not debrief State. sent11: something that does not amplify pallone and/or is a kind of a antipyretic does not debrief Edgar. sent12: the fact that the antiaircraft is suburban and it is adroit is not true if the alchemist is not a kind of a broke. sent13: that the alchemist is not a broke is right. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Palatine and/or is a kind of a pantechnicon does not hold. sent15: the fact that the ninon is not a kind of a racketeering but it is unitary is not right if there is something such that it is not unitary. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the blush is a MKO.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the blush is a MKO that is a thumbhole.; int2 -> int3: that there is something such that it is a MKO and is a kind of a thumbhole is not false.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__