the Zealander does arrogate.
sent1: the agaric is a kind of a geophysicist and sniffs wen. sent2: the shaping is a geophysicist. sent3: the Zealander is fertile if the paraquat does arrogate. sent4: the agaric is explicable and a perishability. sent5: the chandlery sniffs wen. sent6: if the paraquat is clausal then the fact that it is a estaminet hold. sent7: the paraquat is a simile and is a estaminet. sent8: the agaric is a abelia and it arrogates. sent9: the Zealander is a cockspur and it is a kind of a unrespectability if the agaric is not a kind of a geophysicist. sent10: the agaric is a geophysicist if that something is not predestinarian but it does sniff wen is not false. sent11: if the Zealander is a kind of a estaminet and it is explicable then it is not predestinarian. sent12: the agaric is not a estaminet if it does sniff wen and is predestinarian. sent13: if the paraquat is fertile the Zealander is explicable. sent14: the agaric is predestinarian. sent15: the fact that the Zealander is predestinarian is not false. sent16: the paraquat is predestinarian. sent17: if the Zealander is explicable it arrogates. sent18: that the paraquat is fertile is not false if the agaric is not a estaminet. sent19: the Zealander is a rite that does sniff wen. sent20: the agaric is fertile if the paraquat is not predestinarian. sent21: if the paraquat arrogates and it is a kind of a geophysicist it is non-fertile. sent22: the paraquat is clausal. sent23: that the agaric is a kind of a geophysicist is right. sent24: the carbide is explicable and is fertile. sent25: the Zealander is lengthwise and it scouts Zealander.
sent1 -> int1: that the agaric does sniff wen is correct.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the agaric sniffs wen and it is predestinarian.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the agaric is not a estaminet.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the paraquat is fertile.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the Zealander is explicable.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the Zealander does not arrogate.
sent24 -> int6: something is a kind of explicable thing that is fertile.; sent6 & sent22 -> int7: that the paraquat is a estaminet is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the Zealander does arrogate. ; $context$ = sent1: the agaric is a kind of a geophysicist and sniffs wen. sent2: the shaping is a geophysicist. sent3: the Zealander is fertile if the paraquat does arrogate. sent4: the agaric is explicable and a perishability. sent5: the chandlery sniffs wen. sent6: if the paraquat is clausal then the fact that it is a estaminet hold. sent7: the paraquat is a simile and is a estaminet. sent8: the agaric is a abelia and it arrogates. sent9: the Zealander is a cockspur and it is a kind of a unrespectability if the agaric is not a kind of a geophysicist. sent10: the agaric is a geophysicist if that something is not predestinarian but it does sniff wen is not false. sent11: if the Zealander is a kind of a estaminet and it is explicable then it is not predestinarian. sent12: the agaric is not a estaminet if it does sniff wen and is predestinarian. sent13: if the paraquat is fertile the Zealander is explicable. sent14: the agaric is predestinarian. sent15: the fact that the Zealander is predestinarian is not false. sent16: the paraquat is predestinarian. sent17: if the Zealander is explicable it arrogates. sent18: that the paraquat is fertile is not false if the agaric is not a estaminet. sent19: the Zealander is a rite that does sniff wen. sent20: the agaric is fertile if the paraquat is not predestinarian. sent21: if the paraquat arrogates and it is a kind of a geophysicist it is non-fertile. sent22: the paraquat is clausal. sent23: that the agaric is a kind of a geophysicist is right. sent24: the carbide is explicable and is fertile. sent25: the Zealander is lengthwise and it scouts Zealander. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: that the agaric does sniff wen is correct.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the agaric sniffs wen and it is predestinarian.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the agaric is not a estaminet.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the paraquat is fertile.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the Zealander is explicable.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__