there is something such that if it is not a postulant but a Albany then it is distinguishable.
sent1: if the purist is a postulant and is a Albany then it is distinguishable. sent2: if the earthstar is a kind of a Menninger that does spend verity then it is distinguishable. sent3: if the purist is not a postulant but a Albany it is distinguishable. sent4: if the purist is not anthracitic and is a thirst it is calculous. sent5: something is a kind of a Albany if it is not a kind of a noise and is international. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a postulant and it is a Albany hold it is distinguishable.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the inpatient is a Albany is right if it is not a noise and is international.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a postulant but a Albany then it is distinguishable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the purist is a postulant and is a Albany then it is distinguishable. sent2: if the earthstar is a kind of a Menninger that does spend verity then it is distinguishable. sent3: if the purist is not a postulant but a Albany it is distinguishable. sent4: if the purist is not anthracitic and is a thirst it is calculous. sent5: something is a kind of a Albany if it is not a kind of a noise and is international. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a postulant and it is a Albany hold it is distinguishable. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__