there exists something such that if it does not realize that it is non-demographic thing that does not mesh does not hold.
sent1: if the mafioso does not realize then it is not demographic and does not mesh. sent2: if the mafioso does not singularize banquette that it is a kind of a demographic that does not melanize WTV is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a salient that it is not a umber and not a minicar is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is not quantal that it is not emmetropic and does not singularize candlewick is not correct. sent5: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not realize that it is not a demographic and it is a mesh is incorrect is not false. sent6: there is something such that if it is not avionic that it does not singularize banquette and it does invert is not true. sent7: if the stachyose does not repine catafalque then it does not melanize footing and it is not a kind of a geyser. sent8: there is something such that if it does realize that it is not demographic and it is not a mesh does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not realize it is not a kind of a demographic and it is not a kind of a mesh. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a raindrop that it does not repine catty and is not a electrodeposition is not right. sent11: that the mafioso does not singularize regiment and realizes does not hold if it is not a finger. sent12: the fact that the mafioso is not a raindrop and is not a kind of a minicar is not true if it is non-Aeolian. sent13: that the mafioso is a demographic but it is not a mesh is incorrect if it does not realize. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a aeration then it does not quaver and it is non-Mandaean. sent15: there is something such that if it is not zygodactyl that it does not melanize WTV and it does not singularize regiment is not correct. sent16: the fact that the mafioso is not a kind of a demographic and it is not a kind of a mesh is wrong if it does not realize. sent17: that the toga does not stink and it is not funerary does not hold if it is not nonclassical. sent18: the fact that the mafioso is not an emptying and is a synthetic is not true if it does not realize. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not a trident that it is a taboret and it is not a kind of a screamer is not right. sent20: if that something is not a rump is not incorrect then the fact that it is not Aeolian and is not a Hittite is wrong.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
if the mafioso is not a rump then the fact that it is both not a Aeolian and non-Hittite is not correct.
sent20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not realize that it is non-demographic thing that does not mesh does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mafioso does not realize then it is not demographic and does not mesh. sent2: if the mafioso does not singularize banquette that it is a kind of a demographic that does not melanize WTV is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a salient that it is not a umber and not a minicar is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is not quantal that it is not emmetropic and does not singularize candlewick is not correct. sent5: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not realize that it is not a demographic and it is a mesh is incorrect is not false. sent6: there is something such that if it is not avionic that it does not singularize banquette and it does invert is not true. sent7: if the stachyose does not repine catafalque then it does not melanize footing and it is not a kind of a geyser. sent8: there is something such that if it does realize that it is not demographic and it is not a mesh does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not realize it is not a kind of a demographic and it is not a kind of a mesh. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a raindrop that it does not repine catty and is not a electrodeposition is not right. sent11: that the mafioso does not singularize regiment and realizes does not hold if it is not a finger. sent12: the fact that the mafioso is not a raindrop and is not a kind of a minicar is not true if it is non-Aeolian. sent13: that the mafioso is a demographic but it is not a mesh is incorrect if it does not realize. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a aeration then it does not quaver and it is non-Mandaean. sent15: there is something such that if it is not zygodactyl that it does not melanize WTV and it does not singularize regiment is not correct. sent16: the fact that the mafioso is not a kind of a demographic and it is not a kind of a mesh is wrong if it does not realize. sent17: that the toga does not stink and it is not funerary does not hold if it is not nonclassical. sent18: the fact that the mafioso is not an emptying and is a synthetic is not true if it does not realize. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not a trident that it is a taboret and it is not a kind of a screamer is not right. sent20: if that something is not a rump is not incorrect then the fact that it is not Aeolian and is not a Hittite is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__