that the towline is not analogous and it is not a kind of a scapegrace is false.
sent1: if the towline is not a kind of a nominative then it is not analogous. sent2: if the towline is not a scapegrace it is not an acronym. sent3: that the hotel-casino is not a kind of an acronym is true. sent4: that something does not brazen Bessemer or is a nominative or both if it is not a kind of a spokeswoman hold. sent5: if the hotel-casino is not an acronym then it is not analogous. sent6: a non-nominative thing is not analogous and is not a kind of a scapegrace. sent7: if the towline is not a kind of a nominative then that the hotel-casino is not analogous is not incorrect. sent8: something is not chaetognathan. sent9: something is not analogous if it is not a kind of a nominative. sent10: the hotel-casino is not a kind of a scapegrace. sent11: the fact that something is not a nominative and does brazen Bessemer is not right if it is not a spokeswoman. sent12: the towline is not an acronym if the hotel-casino does not brazen Bessemer or it is a nominative or both. sent13: something is both not a nominative and not an acronym if it is non-analogous. sent14: the hotel-casino is not an acronym and not a scapegrace if it is not a kind of a nominative. sent15: the towline is not nominative if the hotel-casino is not an acronym. sent16: something is not a local and is not a mucus if it is not transcendental.
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: that the towline is not a nominative is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int2: the towline is both not analogous and not a scapegrace if it is not a kind of a nominative.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the towline is not analogous and is not a scapegrace is not true.
sent4 -> int3: if the hotel-casino is not a kind of a spokeswoman then it does not brazen Bessemer or it is nominative or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the towline is not analogous and it is not a kind of a scapegrace is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the towline is not a kind of a nominative then it is not analogous. sent2: if the towline is not a scapegrace it is not an acronym. sent3: that the hotel-casino is not a kind of an acronym is true. sent4: that something does not brazen Bessemer or is a nominative or both if it is not a kind of a spokeswoman hold. sent5: if the hotel-casino is not an acronym then it is not analogous. sent6: a non-nominative thing is not analogous and is not a kind of a scapegrace. sent7: if the towline is not a kind of a nominative then that the hotel-casino is not analogous is not incorrect. sent8: something is not chaetognathan. sent9: something is not analogous if it is not a kind of a nominative. sent10: the hotel-casino is not a kind of a scapegrace. sent11: the fact that something is not a nominative and does brazen Bessemer is not right if it is not a spokeswoman. sent12: the towline is not an acronym if the hotel-casino does not brazen Bessemer or it is a nominative or both. sent13: something is both not a nominative and not an acronym if it is non-analogous. sent14: the hotel-casino is not an acronym and not a scapegrace if it is not a kind of a nominative. sent15: the towline is not nominative if the hotel-casino is not an acronym. sent16: something is not a local and is not a mucus if it is not transcendental. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent3 -> int1: that the towline is not a nominative is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int2: the towline is both not analogous and not a scapegrace if it is not a kind of a nominative.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__