the including does not occur.
sent1: the slagging minicomputer does not occur if the slagging orthogonality and the rummaging ghetto happens. sent2: if that both the Sabine and the no-hitter occurs is right the invigilation does not occur. sent3: that the feasting happens is prevented by that the invigilation does not occur. sent4: that the rewarding decontamination occurs hold. sent5: the dripping happens. sent6: that not the feasting but the dripping happens leads to that the ostracism does not occur. sent7: the agreeing occurs and the pegging experience happens. sent8: the sincereness does not occur. sent9: that not the including but the French occurs is caused by that the Sabineness does not occur. sent10: the indistinctness does not occur. sent11: the Frenchness does not occur and the Sabineness happens. sent12: the no-hitter happens. sent13: the skidding does not occur. sent14: the overspill occurs. sent15: the pauperization happens. sent16: the including happens if the indistinctness does not occur and the ostracism does not occur.
sent11 -> int1: the Sabine happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Sabineness occurs and the no-hitter occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the invigilation does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the feasting does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: not the feasting but the dripping happens.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the ostracism does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the indistinctness does not occur and the ostracism does not occur.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the including does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the including does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the slagging minicomputer does not occur if the slagging orthogonality and the rummaging ghetto happens. sent2: if that both the Sabine and the no-hitter occurs is right the invigilation does not occur. sent3: that the feasting happens is prevented by that the invigilation does not occur. sent4: that the rewarding decontamination occurs hold. sent5: the dripping happens. sent6: that not the feasting but the dripping happens leads to that the ostracism does not occur. sent7: the agreeing occurs and the pegging experience happens. sent8: the sincereness does not occur. sent9: that not the including but the French occurs is caused by that the Sabineness does not occur. sent10: the indistinctness does not occur. sent11: the Frenchness does not occur and the Sabineness happens. sent12: the no-hitter happens. sent13: the skidding does not occur. sent14: the overspill occurs. sent15: the pauperization happens. sent16: the including happens if the indistinctness does not occur and the ostracism does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the Sabine happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Sabineness occurs and the no-hitter occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the invigilation does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the feasting does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: not the feasting but the dripping happens.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the ostracism does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the indistinctness does not occur and the ostracism does not occur.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__