if the proposing decay happens that the spewing does not occur but the accrediting flashboard occurs is incorrect.
sent1: both the non-alcoholicness and the filling orchiopexy happens if the filling Lasso occurs. sent2: the proposing bourn happens if the cast happens. sent3: that the proposing bourn happens and the propulsiveness happens results in that the proposing decay does not occur. sent4: the cast happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the spewing but the accrediting flashboard occurs.; sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the proposing bourn occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = if the proposing decay happens that the spewing does not occur but the accrediting flashboard occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: both the non-alcoholicness and the filling orchiopexy happens if the filling Lasso occurs. sent2: the proposing bourn happens if the cast happens. sent3: that the proposing bourn happens and the propulsiveness happens results in that the proposing decay does not occur. sent4: the cast happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the spewing but the accrediting flashboard occurs.; sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the proposing bourn occurs.; __UNKNOWN__