the clearway is a inconspicuousness.
sent1: the kettle is a Englishwoman and a midplane. sent2: the votary is not a governess and does marshal mastic if the Passamaquody is not figurative. sent3: the dot is a shamefacedness. sent4: if the votary is not a kind of a governess and does marshal mastic the dasyure does marshal mastic. sent5: something is a kind of a governess if it is both figurative and not a archine. sent6: something is unlike if it is a stirrer. sent7: the fact that something is choric is not incorrect. sent8: the clearway is a inconspicuousness if there exists something such that it is unlike and a shamefacedness. sent9: the Passamaquody does not preoccupy constitutional if the fact that the caravansary is not a kind of a chronology but it is a ligne does not hold. sent10: something is a inconspicuousness. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a shamefacedness is correct. sent12: if the caravansary is not figurative but it does preoccupy constitutional the Passamaquody is not figurative. sent13: the dasyure is a stirrer if it does not preoccupy dot and it does not marshal mastic. sent14: there is something such that it is unlike. sent15: there is something such that it does advise. sent16: the fact that the caravansary is not a kind of a chronology and is a ligne is wrong if it is hypertonic. sent17: something that is a kind of a archine preoccupies dot. sent18: if the clearway is not a kind of a stirrer then that the dot is a shamefacedness and it is unlike is incorrect. sent19: the votary is both figurative and not a archine if the Passamaquody does not preoccupy constitutional. sent20: the caravansary is non-figurative but it preoccupies constitutional. sent21: the clearway is a kind of a shamefacedness. sent22: the dot is unlike. sent23: that the dot is a kind of a inconspicuousness but it is not a shamefacedness is wrong if the dasyure is unlike.
sent22 & sent3 -> int1: the dot is unlike and it is a kind of a shamefacedness.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of unlike a shamefacedness.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the screwball is a inconspicuousness is not false.
sent12 & sent20 -> int3: the Passamaquody is non-figurative.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the votary is not a governess but it does marshal mastic.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the dasyure marshals mastic.; sent17 -> int6: the dasyure preoccupies dot if it is a archine.;
$hypothesis$ = the clearway is a inconspicuousness. ; $context$ = sent1: the kettle is a Englishwoman and a midplane. sent2: the votary is not a governess and does marshal mastic if the Passamaquody is not figurative. sent3: the dot is a shamefacedness. sent4: if the votary is not a kind of a governess and does marshal mastic the dasyure does marshal mastic. sent5: something is a kind of a governess if it is both figurative and not a archine. sent6: something is unlike if it is a stirrer. sent7: the fact that something is choric is not incorrect. sent8: the clearway is a inconspicuousness if there exists something such that it is unlike and a shamefacedness. sent9: the Passamaquody does not preoccupy constitutional if the fact that the caravansary is not a kind of a chronology but it is a ligne does not hold. sent10: something is a inconspicuousness. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a shamefacedness is correct. sent12: if the caravansary is not figurative but it does preoccupy constitutional the Passamaquody is not figurative. sent13: the dasyure is a stirrer if it does not preoccupy dot and it does not marshal mastic. sent14: there is something such that it is unlike. sent15: there is something such that it does advise. sent16: the fact that the caravansary is not a kind of a chronology and is a ligne is wrong if it is hypertonic. sent17: something that is a kind of a archine preoccupies dot. sent18: if the clearway is not a kind of a stirrer then that the dot is a shamefacedness and it is unlike is incorrect. sent19: the votary is both figurative and not a archine if the Passamaquody does not preoccupy constitutional. sent20: the caravansary is non-figurative but it preoccupies constitutional. sent21: the clearway is a kind of a shamefacedness. sent22: the dot is unlike. sent23: that the dot is a kind of a inconspicuousness but it is not a shamefacedness is wrong if the dasyure is unlike. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent3 -> int1: the dot is unlike and it is a kind of a shamefacedness.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of unlike a shamefacedness.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__