the rearing Aplectrum occurs.
sent1: if either the run-up happens or the endermicness does not occur or both then the legalization happens. sent2: the fact that the non-fittingness causes that the rearing sexton occurs and the topness occurs is correct. sent3: the reinstatement occurs if the fact that the topness does not occur and the reinstatement does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the southernness occurs hold. sent5: that both the neutrality and the reenactment happens is triggered by that the weaving wahoo does not occur. sent6: that the fungalness does not occur but the altitudinalness happens is not correct. sent7: the weaving wahoo does not occur but the neutrality occurs if the reinstatement occurs. sent8: that the reinstatement does not occur hold. sent9: if the fact that both the joyriding and the fitting occurs is not correct then the fitting does not occur. sent10: the southernness occurs if the neutrality occurs. sent11: if the gonadalness does not occur then the fact that both the non-fittingness and the fake happens does not hold. sent12: if the self-punishment does not occur the fact that the joyriding and the fitting occurs is false. sent13: if the fact that both the non-Genoeseness and the non-Episcopalness occurs is incorrect then that the self-punishment does not occur is not false. sent14: that if the reinstatement does not occur that not the palatoglossalness but the southernness happens does not hold hold. sent15: that the neutrality happens leads to that the palatoglossalness does not occur but the southernness happens. sent16: that the rearing Aplectrum occurs is caused by that the weaving wahoo happens and/or that the neutrality does not occur. sent17: that the nonrandomness happens but the reinstatement does not occur is brought about by the topping. sent18: if the indexation does not occur the fact that the Genoeseness does not occur and the Episcopalness does not occur is incorrect. sent19: the nonfinancialness does not occur. sent20: if the weaving Geiger does not occur that the non-archegonialness and the rearing tinamou occurs is wrong. sent21: that the rearing Aplectrum happens is prevented by that the nonrandomness but not the reinstatement happens. sent22: the weaving wahoo or the neutrality or both happens. sent23: that the rearing Aplectrum does not occur is caused by that the weaving wahoo does not occur and the neutrality occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the neutrality occurs is true.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the palatoglossalness does not occur but the southernness occurs.; sent14 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that both the non-palatoglossalness and the southernness occurs is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the neutrality does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the weaving wahoo happens and/or the neutrality does not occur.; int5 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the reenactment occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the rearing Aplectrum occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if either the run-up happens or the endermicness does not occur or both then the legalization happens. sent2: the fact that the non-fittingness causes that the rearing sexton occurs and the topness occurs is correct. sent3: the reinstatement occurs if the fact that the topness does not occur and the reinstatement does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the southernness occurs hold. sent5: that both the neutrality and the reenactment happens is triggered by that the weaving wahoo does not occur. sent6: that the fungalness does not occur but the altitudinalness happens is not correct. sent7: the weaving wahoo does not occur but the neutrality occurs if the reinstatement occurs. sent8: that the reinstatement does not occur hold. sent9: if the fact that both the joyriding and the fitting occurs is not correct then the fitting does not occur. sent10: the southernness occurs if the neutrality occurs. sent11: if the gonadalness does not occur then the fact that both the non-fittingness and the fake happens does not hold. sent12: if the self-punishment does not occur the fact that the joyriding and the fitting occurs is false. sent13: if the fact that both the non-Genoeseness and the non-Episcopalness occurs is incorrect then that the self-punishment does not occur is not false. sent14: that if the reinstatement does not occur that not the palatoglossalness but the southernness happens does not hold hold. sent15: that the neutrality happens leads to that the palatoglossalness does not occur but the southernness happens. sent16: that the rearing Aplectrum occurs is caused by that the weaving wahoo happens and/or that the neutrality does not occur. sent17: that the nonrandomness happens but the reinstatement does not occur is brought about by the topping. sent18: if the indexation does not occur the fact that the Genoeseness does not occur and the Episcopalness does not occur is incorrect. sent19: the nonfinancialness does not occur. sent20: if the weaving Geiger does not occur that the non-archegonialness and the rearing tinamou occurs is wrong. sent21: that the rearing Aplectrum happens is prevented by that the nonrandomness but not the reinstatement happens. sent22: the weaving wahoo or the neutrality or both happens. sent23: that the rearing Aplectrum does not occur is caused by that the weaving wahoo does not occur and the neutrality occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the neutrality occurs is true.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the palatoglossalness does not occur but the southernness occurs.; sent14 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that both the non-palatoglossalness and the southernness occurs is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the neutrality does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the weaving wahoo happens and/or the neutrality does not occur.; int5 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__