the fact that the harmonization occurs but the oscineness does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the heel occurs if the oscine happens. sent2: the discriminatoriness occurs and the demobilization does not occur. sent3: the expectorating happens if that not the witching but the filicide happens does not hold. sent4: the harmonization happens if the filicide occurs. sent5: the Congregationalness occurs. sent6: if the fact that the spanging happens and/or the drift occurs does not hold then the oscine does not occur. sent7: the harmonization does not occur if the fact that the drifting does not occur and the harmonization occurs does not hold. sent8: that that either the spanging or the drift or both occurs is not incorrect is not correct. sent9: the spanging and the oscineness occurs if the distinguishing gayfeather does not occur. sent10: the ailing does not occur. sent11: the attendance happens if the expectorating happens but the distinguishing pun does not occur. sent12: that the ailing does not occur results in that both the distinguishing Carib and the distinguishing pun occurs. sent13: the dictyopteranness prevents that the subrogation does not occur. sent14: the distinguishing pun does not occur if the expectorating occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the witching but the filicide happens is wrong.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the expectorating happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the distinguishing pun does not occur.; sent12 & sent10 -> int3: both the distinguishing Carib and the distinguishing pun happens.; int3 -> int4: the distinguishing pun occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the witching does not occur and the filicide happens.; int6 -> int7: the filicide happens.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the harmonization happens.; sent6 & sent8 -> int9: that the oscine does not occur is not incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the heeling and the attendance occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the harmonization occurs but the oscineness does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the heel occurs if the oscine happens. sent2: the discriminatoriness occurs and the demobilization does not occur. sent3: the expectorating happens if that not the witching but the filicide happens does not hold. sent4: the harmonization happens if the filicide occurs. sent5: the Congregationalness occurs. sent6: if the fact that the spanging happens and/or the drift occurs does not hold then the oscine does not occur. sent7: the harmonization does not occur if the fact that the drifting does not occur and the harmonization occurs does not hold. sent8: that that either the spanging or the drift or both occurs is not incorrect is not correct. sent9: the spanging and the oscineness occurs if the distinguishing gayfeather does not occur. sent10: the ailing does not occur. sent11: the attendance happens if the expectorating happens but the distinguishing pun does not occur. sent12: that the ailing does not occur results in that both the distinguishing Carib and the distinguishing pun occurs. sent13: the dictyopteranness prevents that the subrogation does not occur. sent14: the distinguishing pun does not occur if the expectorating occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the witching but the filicide happens is wrong.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the expectorating happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the distinguishing pun does not occur.; sent12 & sent10 -> int3: both the distinguishing Carib and the distinguishing pun happens.; int3 -> int4: the distinguishing pun occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the witching does not occur and the filicide happens.; int6 -> int7: the filicide happens.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the harmonization happens.; sent6 & sent8 -> int9: that the oscine does not occur is not incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__