that there exists something such that if it is a ECC the fact that it does lean and it is not a semivowel is not correct is incorrect.
sent1: that the polymyxin is sociocultural and is not a semivowel does not hold if it is a liking. sent2: there is something such that if it shuns Arminius then the fact that it does bleed and it does not din is false. sent3: that the Marrano is a sannyasi that is a semivowel is incorrect if it is musculoskeletal. sent4: the fact that something does overreach polymyxin but it is not a liking does not hold if it is a kind of a semivowel. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a ECC that it is a kind of lean thing that is a semivowel is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the engineering is lean but not a semivowel is not true if that it is a ECC is not incorrect.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
if the engineering is a semivowel that it overreaches polymyxin and it is not liking is false.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a ECC the fact that it does lean and it is not a semivowel is not correct is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the polymyxin is sociocultural and is not a semivowel does not hold if it is a liking. sent2: there is something such that if it shuns Arminius then the fact that it does bleed and it does not din is false. sent3: that the Marrano is a sannyasi that is a semivowel is incorrect if it is musculoskeletal. sent4: the fact that something does overreach polymyxin but it is not a liking does not hold if it is a kind of a semivowel. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a ECC that it is a kind of lean thing that is a semivowel is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the engineering is lean but not a semivowel is not true if that it is a ECC is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__