the nail is not nonastringent and does not instruct.
sent1: the fact that the nail is nonastringent and does not instruct is not true if it is not a satrap. sent2: if the Zuni is perceptual then the movement headquarters Medawar. sent3: if the governess is a satrap the nail is astringent thing that does not instruct. sent4: the movement is not a Protestant or does not headquarter Medawar or both. sent5: something is chaste thing that is not ethnocentric if it is a kind of a satrap. sent6: the fact that the nail is not unchaste is right if it headquarters Medawar. sent7: the Zuni headquarters Medawar if the nail is non-perceptual and it is not unchaste. sent8: something that is a satrap is not unchaste. sent9: if the Zuni is perceptual then that the movement is not a Protestant or does not headquarter Medawar or both is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the governess is a beech if the nail is not unchaste and is not ethnocentric is not wrong. sent11: if the nail is unchaste thing that is not ethnocentric then the governess is a beech. sent12: if the fact that the nail is not a satrap is not false that it is non-nonastringent thing that does instruct is not right. sent13: if the nail is not Protestant and it does not instruct the movement is not astringent. sent14: the movement is not a Protestant or headquarters Medawar or both. sent15: if the governess is a beech then the Zuni is perceptual. sent16: the movement does headquarter Medawar. sent17: if the Zuni is a kind of non-perceptual thing that is not nonastringent then the nail is a satrap. sent18: the nail is not unchaste. sent19: the fact that something is not nonastringent and it does not instruct is not correct if it is not a kind of a satrap. sent20: the governess is unchaste. sent21: the fact that the nail is nonastringent but it does not instruct is not true.
sent5 -> int1: the nail is not unchaste and it is not ethnocentric if it is a kind of a satrap.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nail is a satrap.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nail is a kind of chaste thing that is not ethnocentric.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the governess is a beech.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the Zuni is perceptual.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that either the movement is not a Protestant or it does not headquarter Medawar or both is not true.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the nail is not a kind of a satrap is right.; sent19 -> int8: if the nail is not a satrap that it is not nonastringent and does not instruct is false.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the nail is not nonastringent and it does not instruct.
$hypothesis$ = the nail is not nonastringent and does not instruct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the nail is nonastringent and does not instruct is not true if it is not a satrap. sent2: if the Zuni is perceptual then the movement headquarters Medawar. sent3: if the governess is a satrap the nail is astringent thing that does not instruct. sent4: the movement is not a Protestant or does not headquarter Medawar or both. sent5: something is chaste thing that is not ethnocentric if it is a kind of a satrap. sent6: the fact that the nail is not unchaste is right if it headquarters Medawar. sent7: the Zuni headquarters Medawar if the nail is non-perceptual and it is not unchaste. sent8: something that is a satrap is not unchaste. sent9: if the Zuni is perceptual then that the movement is not a Protestant or does not headquarter Medawar or both is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the governess is a beech if the nail is not unchaste and is not ethnocentric is not wrong. sent11: if the nail is unchaste thing that is not ethnocentric then the governess is a beech. sent12: if the fact that the nail is not a satrap is not false that it is non-nonastringent thing that does instruct is not right. sent13: if the nail is not Protestant and it does not instruct the movement is not astringent. sent14: the movement is not a Protestant or headquarters Medawar or both. sent15: if the governess is a beech then the Zuni is perceptual. sent16: the movement does headquarter Medawar. sent17: if the Zuni is a kind of non-perceptual thing that is not nonastringent then the nail is a satrap. sent18: the nail is not unchaste. sent19: the fact that something is not nonastringent and it does not instruct is not correct if it is not a kind of a satrap. sent20: the governess is unchaste. sent21: the fact that the nail is nonastringent but it does not instruct is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the nail is not unchaste and it is not ethnocentric if it is a kind of a satrap.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nail is a satrap.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the nail is a kind of chaste thing that is not ethnocentric.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the governess is a beech.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the Zuni is perceptual.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: that either the movement is not a Protestant or it does not headquarter Medawar or both is not true.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the nail is not a kind of a satrap is right.; sent19 -> int8: if the nail is not a satrap that it is not nonastringent and does not instruct is false.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__