the unfashionableness does not occur.
sent1: if the dinging occurs then the juncture occurs. sent2: that the Honduranness does not occur and the fester does not occur is caused by the non-Incanness. sent3: the unfashionableness does not occur if both the juncture and the uncriticalness occurs. sent4: that the unwrapping Nicotiana does not occur or the slinging occurs or both prevents that the Incanness happens. sent5: the uncriticalness happens. sent6: the Honduranness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unwrapping Nicotiana does not occur and/or the slinging happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Incanness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Honduranness does not occur and the festering does not occur.; int2 -> int3: that the Honduran does not occur is not false.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the unwrapping Nicotiana does not occur or the slinging happens or both is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the unfashionableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dinging occurs then the juncture occurs. sent2: that the Honduranness does not occur and the fester does not occur is caused by the non-Incanness. sent3: the unfashionableness does not occur if both the juncture and the uncriticalness occurs. sent4: that the unwrapping Nicotiana does not occur or the slinging occurs or both prevents that the Incanness happens. sent5: the uncriticalness happens. sent6: the Honduranness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unwrapping Nicotiana does not occur and/or the slinging happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Incanness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Honduranness does not occur and the festering does not occur.; int2 -> int3: that the Honduran does not occur is not false.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the unwrapping Nicotiana does not occur or the slinging happens or both is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__