the ogler is a trente-et-quarante.
sent1: that something is not a unbelief is true if it is not a tropicbird and it is tasteful. sent2: the fact that the endoparasite is not arbitrable is not false. sent3: if the etcetera does not vex insubordination that the ogler does not vex insubordination and it is not a conception does not hold. sent4: the fact that the endoparasite is not curable is incorrect. sent5: there exists nothing that is endoergic and a conception. sent6: the endoparasite is not a unbelief if something does not vex insubordination. sent7: the endoparasite is arbitrable if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a tropicbird and is tasteful is false. sent8: if the fact that the etcetera does not vex insubordination is not false then that the ogler vex insubordination and is not a conception is wrong. sent9: that the migrant is a healthfulness and not tasteful is wrong. sent10: if something is not a unbelief it does not vex insubordination. sent11: there is something such that it is not a quahog and does vex goral. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is endoergic a conception does not hold then the apodeme does not vex insubordination. sent13: the mustard is not arbitrable. sent14: if that something does not vex insubordination and is not a conception is incorrect it is not a trente-et-quarante.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the etcetera is both not a tropicbird and tasteful is wrong.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a tropicbird and it is tasteful is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the endoparasite is arbitrable.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the etcetera is not a tropicbird but tasteful is correct.; sent1 -> int5: the etcetera is not a unbelief if it is not a tropicbird and it is tasteful.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the etcetera is not a unbelief.; sent10 -> int7: if the etcetera is not a unbelief it does not vex insubordination.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the etcetera does not vex insubordination.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the ogler does not vex insubordination and it is not a conception is not true.; sent14 -> int10: the ogler is not a trente-et-quarante if the fact that it does not vex insubordination and it is not a conception is not true.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the ogler is a trente-et-quarante.
sent5 -> int11: that the proliferation is endoergic and it is a kind of a conception does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is endoergic and is a kind of a conception is incorrect.; int12 & sent12 -> int13: the apodeme does not vex insubordination.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it does not vex insubordination.; int14 & sent6 -> int15: that the endoparasite is not a unbelief is correct.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a unbelief is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the ogler is a trente-et-quarante. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a unbelief is true if it is not a tropicbird and it is tasteful. sent2: the fact that the endoparasite is not arbitrable is not false. sent3: if the etcetera does not vex insubordination that the ogler does not vex insubordination and it is not a conception does not hold. sent4: the fact that the endoparasite is not curable is incorrect. sent5: there exists nothing that is endoergic and a conception. sent6: the endoparasite is not a unbelief if something does not vex insubordination. sent7: the endoparasite is arbitrable if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a tropicbird and is tasteful is false. sent8: if the fact that the etcetera does not vex insubordination is not false then that the ogler vex insubordination and is not a conception is wrong. sent9: that the migrant is a healthfulness and not tasteful is wrong. sent10: if something is not a unbelief it does not vex insubordination. sent11: there is something such that it is not a quahog and does vex goral. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is endoergic a conception does not hold then the apodeme does not vex insubordination. sent13: the mustard is not arbitrable. sent14: if that something does not vex insubordination and is not a conception is incorrect it is not a trente-et-quarante. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the etcetera is both not a tropicbird and tasteful is wrong.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a tropicbird and it is tasteful is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the endoparasite is arbitrable.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the etcetera is not a tropicbird but tasteful is correct.; sent1 -> int5: the etcetera is not a unbelief if it is not a tropicbird and it is tasteful.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the etcetera is not a unbelief.; sent10 -> int7: if the etcetera is not a unbelief it does not vex insubordination.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the etcetera does not vex insubordination.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the ogler does not vex insubordination and it is not a conception is not true.; sent14 -> int10: the ogler is not a trente-et-quarante if the fact that it does not vex insubordination and it is not a conception is not true.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__