the animating occurs.
sent1: the gutlessness does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the packaging and the non-republicanness happens is not right if the effortlessness does not occur. sent3: the hap does not occur if the revising kindheartedness occurs and/or the forbidding occurs. sent4: the non-uneagerness yields that both the animating and the non-incredulousness occurs. sent5: the prerequisite and the radialness happens if the flex does not occur. sent6: if either the uneagerness or the acceding or both happens the recount does not occur. sent7: either the thumping or the sighting or both occurs. sent8: that not the gutlessness but the laughter occurs triggers the effortfulness. sent9: the laughter happens. sent10: if the recount does not occur that the foot occurs is true. sent11: the indeterminateness does not occur if both the foot and the radialness happens. sent12: the flexing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uneagerness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the uneagerness and/or the acceding occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the recount does not occur.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the footing happens.; sent5 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the prerequisite and the radial occurs is right.; int4 -> int5: the radialness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the foot and the radial happens.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the indeterminateness does not occur.; sent1 & sent9 -> int8: both the non-gutlessness and the laughter happens.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the effortlessness does not occur.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: that the packaging but not the republicanness occurs does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the animating occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the gutlessness does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the packaging and the non-republicanness happens is not right if the effortlessness does not occur. sent3: the hap does not occur if the revising kindheartedness occurs and/or the forbidding occurs. sent4: the non-uneagerness yields that both the animating and the non-incredulousness occurs. sent5: the prerequisite and the radialness happens if the flex does not occur. sent6: if either the uneagerness or the acceding or both happens the recount does not occur. sent7: either the thumping or the sighting or both occurs. sent8: that not the gutlessness but the laughter occurs triggers the effortfulness. sent9: the laughter happens. sent10: if the recount does not occur that the foot occurs is true. sent11: the indeterminateness does not occur if both the foot and the radialness happens. sent12: the flexing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uneagerness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the uneagerness and/or the acceding occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the recount does not occur.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the footing happens.; sent5 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the prerequisite and the radial occurs is right.; int4 -> int5: the radialness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the foot and the radial happens.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the indeterminateness does not occur.; sent1 & sent9 -> int8: both the non-gutlessness and the laughter happens.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the effortlessness does not occur.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: that the packaging but not the republicanness occurs does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__