the compensating Carthusian does not occur but the crusting monstera occurs.
sent1: the crusting carboxyl happens. sent2: if the inoperableness occurs the fact that not the compensating Carthusian but the crusting monstera happens is false. sent3: the inoperableness occurs and the morticing Loafer happens if the whittling does not occur. sent4: the fact that not the inoperableness but the compensating Carthusian occurs is not correct. sent5: the crusting monstera happens. sent6: not the bardolatry but the lupineness happens. sent7: if that the compensating Carthusian does not occur and the inoperableness does not occur is not correct the trickery happens. sent8: the feinting does not occur and the crusting carboxyl occurs. sent9: the lupine happens. sent10: that not the effervescentness but the signing occurs is not correct. sent11: if the feint does not occur and the crusting carboxyl occurs the inoperableness does not occur. sent12: the compensating groupware happens. sent13: the argenticness does not occur. sent14: the subordinateness does not occur.
sent11 & sent8 -> int1: the inoperableness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the compensating Carthusian occurs is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the operableness and the compensating Carthusian happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the compensating Carthusian does not occur is correct.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the trickery happens.
$hypothesis$ = the compensating Carthusian does not occur but the crusting monstera occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the crusting carboxyl happens. sent2: if the inoperableness occurs the fact that not the compensating Carthusian but the crusting monstera happens is false. sent3: the inoperableness occurs and the morticing Loafer happens if the whittling does not occur. sent4: the fact that not the inoperableness but the compensating Carthusian occurs is not correct. sent5: the crusting monstera happens. sent6: not the bardolatry but the lupineness happens. sent7: if that the compensating Carthusian does not occur and the inoperableness does not occur is not correct the trickery happens. sent8: the feinting does not occur and the crusting carboxyl occurs. sent9: the lupine happens. sent10: that not the effervescentness but the signing occurs is not correct. sent11: if the feint does not occur and the crusting carboxyl occurs the inoperableness does not occur. sent12: the compensating groupware happens. sent13: the argenticness does not occur. sent14: the subordinateness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent8 -> int1: the inoperableness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the compensating Carthusian occurs is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the operableness and the compensating Carthusian happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the compensating Carthusian does not occur is correct.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__