the fact that if that the wresting fishery but not the entrenching attempt happens is not right then that the mutationalness does not occur is right is not right.
sent1: the jazzing Leccinum occurs. sent2: the natalness occurs. sent3: the basking happens. sent4: the unrestrictiveness occurs and the entrenching plowwright happens. sent5: both the Tunisian and the ethnographicness happens. sent6: that the wresting fishery occurs but the entrenching attempt does not occur yields that the mystifying pug occurs. sent7: the mystifying pug happens if the entrenching attempt happens. sent8: if the fact that the wresting fishery occurs but the entrenching attempt does not occur is false the mutationalness occurs. sent9: the creaseproofness happens and the mutationalness happens if the mystifying pug does not occur. sent10: the mutationalness does not occur if the wresting fishery but not the entrenching attempt occurs. sent11: if that the jazzing overactivity happens and the assay does not occur is incorrect the jazzing scaphocephaly occurs. sent12: the mutationalness does not occur if the entrenching attempt happens. sent13: that the incommutableness happens and the ethnographicness occurs prevents the mystifying publicist. sent14: the emergence does not occur. sent15: that both the wresting epicureanism and the lording occurs is triggered by that the emergence does not occur. sent16: if that the fact that the assay occurs but the mystifying pigment does not occur is right is wrong the agrobiologicness does not occur. sent17: that the wresting fishery and the entrenching attempt happens is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that the wresting fishery but not the entrenching attempt happens is false then the mystifying pug happens. sent19: the lording happens. sent20: that the onomasticness does not occur hold. sent21: that that the Judaicness but not the favoritism occurs is not incorrect is wrong. sent22: that the wresting epicureanism does not occur is caused by that the mystifying pug happens and the mutationalness occurs. sent23: if the emergence does not occur then the lording occurs. sent24: both the mystifying timolol and the waiving happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the wresting fishery occurs but the entrenching attempt does not occur does not hold.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the mystifying pug occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mutationalness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the mystifying pug and the mutationalness happens.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the wresting epicureanism does not occur.; sent15 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the wresting epicureanism and the lording happens is not wrong.; int4 -> int5: the wresting epicureanism occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the mutationalness does not occur hold.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the creaseproofness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the wresting fishery but not the entrenching attempt happens is not right then that the mutationalness does not occur is right is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the jazzing Leccinum occurs. sent2: the natalness occurs. sent3: the basking happens. sent4: the unrestrictiveness occurs and the entrenching plowwright happens. sent5: both the Tunisian and the ethnographicness happens. sent6: that the wresting fishery occurs but the entrenching attempt does not occur yields that the mystifying pug occurs. sent7: the mystifying pug happens if the entrenching attempt happens. sent8: if the fact that the wresting fishery occurs but the entrenching attempt does not occur is false the mutationalness occurs. sent9: the creaseproofness happens and the mutationalness happens if the mystifying pug does not occur. sent10: the mutationalness does not occur if the wresting fishery but not the entrenching attempt occurs. sent11: if that the jazzing overactivity happens and the assay does not occur is incorrect the jazzing scaphocephaly occurs. sent12: the mutationalness does not occur if the entrenching attempt happens. sent13: that the incommutableness happens and the ethnographicness occurs prevents the mystifying publicist. sent14: the emergence does not occur. sent15: that both the wresting epicureanism and the lording occurs is triggered by that the emergence does not occur. sent16: if that the fact that the assay occurs but the mystifying pigment does not occur is right is wrong the agrobiologicness does not occur. sent17: that the wresting fishery and the entrenching attempt happens is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that the wresting fishery but not the entrenching attempt happens is false then the mystifying pug happens. sent19: the lording happens. sent20: that the onomasticness does not occur hold. sent21: that that the Judaicness but not the favoritism occurs is not incorrect is wrong. sent22: that the wresting epicureanism does not occur is caused by that the mystifying pug happens and the mutationalness occurs. sent23: if the emergence does not occur then the lording occurs. sent24: both the mystifying timolol and the waiving happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the wresting fishery occurs but the entrenching attempt does not occur does not hold.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the mystifying pug occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mutationalness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the mystifying pug and the mutationalness happens.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the wresting epicureanism does not occur.; sent15 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the wresting epicureanism and the lording happens is not wrong.; int4 -> int5: the wresting epicureanism occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the mutationalness does not occur hold.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__