that there is something such that if it does not reprise Illyrian and does not reprise Cacalia then the fact that it does not reprise jackdaw is not wrong is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not reprise sketch and it gins drunkard the fact that it does dispense is wrong. sent2: that there is something such that if it is archival and it is not hieroglyphic it is not a Keble is true. sent3: if the mafioso does not reprise Illyrian and it does not reprise Cacalia then it does not reprise jackdaw. sent4: there is something such that if it does disown immunodeficiency and it does not gin anemone then it is not pectic. sent5: there is something such that if it does not disown shyness and does not gin bawbee it does not contribute. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a service and it is cyclic it is not scentless. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a grub and it is Ottoman it does not debouch. sent8: the mafioso does not reprise jackdaw if it does not reprise Illyrian and it does reprise Cacalia. sent9: if the mafioso is not scentless and is a standing then it is not a subrogation. sent10: if the mafioso reprises Illyrian and does not reprise Cacalia then it does not reprise jackdaw. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a humbug and it is not subordinate then it is not an inscription. sent12: the mafioso does not reprise Illyrian if it is not a rocker and is cyclic. sent13: the mafioso is not sublingual if it does not gin tent-fly and it reprises mafioso. sent14: something is not artificial if it is not a snowberry and it is not an ounce.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a snowberry and it is not an ounce then it is not artificial.
sent14 -> int1: the jackdaw is not artificial if it is not a snowberry and it is not a kind of an ounce.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not reprise Illyrian and does not reprise Cacalia then the fact that it does not reprise jackdaw is not wrong is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not reprise sketch and it gins drunkard the fact that it does dispense is wrong. sent2: that there is something such that if it is archival and it is not hieroglyphic it is not a Keble is true. sent3: if the mafioso does not reprise Illyrian and it does not reprise Cacalia then it does not reprise jackdaw. sent4: there is something such that if it does disown immunodeficiency and it does not gin anemone then it is not pectic. sent5: there is something such that if it does not disown shyness and does not gin bawbee it does not contribute. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a service and it is cyclic it is not scentless. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a grub and it is Ottoman it does not debouch. sent8: the mafioso does not reprise jackdaw if it does not reprise Illyrian and it does reprise Cacalia. sent9: if the mafioso is not scentless and is a standing then it is not a subrogation. sent10: if the mafioso reprises Illyrian and does not reprise Cacalia then it does not reprise jackdaw. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a humbug and it is not subordinate then it is not an inscription. sent12: the mafioso does not reprise Illyrian if it is not a rocker and is cyclic. sent13: the mafioso is not sublingual if it does not gin tent-fly and it reprises mafioso. sent14: something is not artificial if it is not a snowberry and it is not an ounce. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__