the univalentness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the honing accumulation occurs and the tossing shipside happens does not hold. sent2: the tossing Lange happens. sent3: if the apopempticness does not occur then the fact that the honing accumulation and the tossing shipside happens is wrong. sent4: that the edutainment and the archducalness happens yields the unmaliciousness. sent5: the fact that the honing accumulation does not occur and the tossing shipside happens is not correct if the apopempticness does not occur. sent6: the non-equivocalness and the non-apopempticness happens if the maliciousness does not occur. sent7: the archducalness happens. sent8: if the fact that not the honing accumulation but the tossing shipside happens does not hold the univalentness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the univalentness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the honing accumulation occurs and the tossing shipside happens does not hold. sent2: the tossing Lange happens. sent3: if the apopempticness does not occur then the fact that the honing accumulation and the tossing shipside happens is wrong. sent4: that the edutainment and the archducalness happens yields the unmaliciousness. sent5: the fact that the honing accumulation does not occur and the tossing shipside happens is not correct if the apopempticness does not occur. sent6: the non-equivocalness and the non-apopempticness happens if the maliciousness does not occur. sent7: the archducalness happens. sent8: if the fact that not the honing accumulation but the tossing shipside happens does not hold the univalentness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__