the predictor neglects cellulite.
sent1: that the fastnacht is a bubbling or it does sentimentalise icepick or both hold if it is not a Somalian. sent2: the fact that the predictor is a kind of a drainplug and is not harmful does not hold if the areola does sentimentalise weakness. sent3: the areola sentimentalises weakness. sent4: the areola does not sentimentalise weakness if it is either not a Mastigoproctus or not ineligible or both. sent5: the areola either is not a drainplug or does sentimentalise weakness or both. sent6: that everything does neglect Sazerac is correct. sent7: The weakness sentimentalises areola. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a kind of an annex and is not a kind of a daycare is not true then the Antiguan does not neglect parasitism. sent9: if the predictor is not a FTC it is not eligible. sent10: if the predictor sentimentalises weakness that the areola is both a FTC and not eligible does not hold. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not neglect parasitism that the regression is a kind of a drainplug or it does sentimentalise weakness or both is incorrect. sent12: that something does not annex and it is not a daycare does not hold if it does neglect Sazerac. sent13: the predictor is not a kind of a counterespionage. sent14: the fact that the predictor is annelid thing that is not a Mastigoproctus is not correct. sent15: if the fact that something is a drainplug that is not harmful does not hold then it is eligible. sent16: the fact that the fact that the predictor is intramuscular and is systematic does not hold is right. sent17: if the predictor is not a FTC either it does not neglect cellulite or it does sentimentalise weakness or both. sent18: the fact that the predictor is not eligible is right if it is not a FTC and/or it is a Mastigoproctus. sent19: the spectinomycin is not harmful if the fact that the regression is a drainplug and/or it does sentimentalise weakness is not correct. sent20: something is nonruminant if it is a kind of a park. sent21: if the fact that something is a drainplug but it is not a kind of a FTC is not true then it is harmful. sent22: something neglects cellulite if the fact that it is a kind of a drainplug and does not sentimentalise weakness is wrong. sent23: if the fact that the predictor is a FTC but it does not rationalize stereoscopy is false it does rationalize Antiguan.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the predictor does not neglect cellulite.; sent15 -> int1: if the fact that the predictor is a kind of a drainplug but it is not harmful does not hold then it is eligible.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the predictor is a drainplug and is not harmful is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the predictor is eligible.;
the predictor does not neglect cellulite.
sent12 -> int4: if the chimneypot does neglect Sazerac that it does not annex and it is not a daycare is not correct.; sent6 -> int5: the chimneypot does neglect Sazerac.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the chimneypot is not an annex and it is not a kind of a daycare is false.; int6 -> int7: there is nothing such that it is not an annex and is not a daycare.; int7 -> int8: that the hairline is both not an annex and not a daycare is not right.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that the fact that that it does not annex and it is not a daycare is not incorrect is not correct.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the Antiguan does not neglect parasitism.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it does not neglect parasitism.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: that the regression is a drainplug and/or it sentimentalises weakness is false.; int12 & sent19 -> int13: the fact that the spectinomycin is not harmful is not wrong.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not harmful.;
$hypothesis$ = the predictor neglects cellulite. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fastnacht is a bubbling or it does sentimentalise icepick or both hold if it is not a Somalian. sent2: the fact that the predictor is a kind of a drainplug and is not harmful does not hold if the areola does sentimentalise weakness. sent3: the areola sentimentalises weakness. sent4: the areola does not sentimentalise weakness if it is either not a Mastigoproctus or not ineligible or both. sent5: the areola either is not a drainplug or does sentimentalise weakness or both. sent6: that everything does neglect Sazerac is correct. sent7: The weakness sentimentalises areola. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a kind of an annex and is not a kind of a daycare is not true then the Antiguan does not neglect parasitism. sent9: if the predictor is not a FTC it is not eligible. sent10: if the predictor sentimentalises weakness that the areola is both a FTC and not eligible does not hold. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not neglect parasitism that the regression is a kind of a drainplug or it does sentimentalise weakness or both is incorrect. sent12: that something does not annex and it is not a daycare does not hold if it does neglect Sazerac. sent13: the predictor is not a kind of a counterespionage. sent14: the fact that the predictor is annelid thing that is not a Mastigoproctus is not correct. sent15: if the fact that something is a drainplug that is not harmful does not hold then it is eligible. sent16: the fact that the fact that the predictor is intramuscular and is systematic does not hold is right. sent17: if the predictor is not a FTC either it does not neglect cellulite or it does sentimentalise weakness or both. sent18: the fact that the predictor is not eligible is right if it is not a FTC and/or it is a Mastigoproctus. sent19: the spectinomycin is not harmful if the fact that the regression is a drainplug and/or it does sentimentalise weakness is not correct. sent20: something is nonruminant if it is a kind of a park. sent21: if the fact that something is a drainplug but it is not a kind of a FTC is not true then it is harmful. sent22: something neglects cellulite if the fact that it is a kind of a drainplug and does not sentimentalise weakness is wrong. sent23: if the fact that the predictor is a FTC but it does not rationalize stereoscopy is false it does rationalize Antiguan. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the predictor does not neglect cellulite.; sent15 -> int1: if the fact that the predictor is a kind of a drainplug but it is not harmful does not hold then it is eligible.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the predictor is a drainplug and is not harmful is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the predictor is eligible.; __UNKNOWN__