the fact that the menstruum does not carbonate stuck is not wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the sildenafil is a kyat and it carbonates stuck is wrong then the menstruum does not carbonates stuck. sent2: something is not a PMS and not immunotherapeutic. sent3: the bayou is a kind of a Son if the sildenafil is a dray. sent4: if the airstrip is a PMS then the menstruum does not realize zinger and is immunotherapeutic. sent5: the sildenafil either is a kind of a kyat or is a kind of a dray or both. sent6: the menstruum does carbonate stuck if it realizes zinger and is immunotherapeutic. sent7: that if the bayou is a kind of a Son then the airstrip is a PMS is correct. sent8: if something that does realize zinger is immunotherapeutic it carbonates stuck. sent9: that the bayou is a Son is right if the sildenafil is a kyat. sent10: if something does not realize zinger and is not non-immunotherapeutic then that it does carbonate stuck is not false.
sent5 & sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the bayou is a kind of a Son.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the airstrip is a PMS.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the menstruum does not realize zinger and is immunotherapeutic.; sent10 -> int4: the menstruum carbonates stuck if it does not realize zinger and is immunotherapeutic.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the rudapithecus is a Son.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the menstruum does not carbonate stuck is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the sildenafil is a kyat and it carbonates stuck is wrong then the menstruum does not carbonates stuck. sent2: something is not a PMS and not immunotherapeutic. sent3: the bayou is a kind of a Son if the sildenafil is a dray. sent4: if the airstrip is a PMS then the menstruum does not realize zinger and is immunotherapeutic. sent5: the sildenafil either is a kind of a kyat or is a kind of a dray or both. sent6: the menstruum does carbonate stuck if it realizes zinger and is immunotherapeutic. sent7: that if the bayou is a kind of a Son then the airstrip is a PMS is correct. sent8: if something that does realize zinger is immunotherapeutic it carbonates stuck. sent9: that the bayou is a Son is right if the sildenafil is a kyat. sent10: if something does not realize zinger and is not non-immunotherapeutic then that it does carbonate stuck is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the bayou is a kind of a Son.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the airstrip is a PMS.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the menstruum does not realize zinger and is immunotherapeutic.; sent10 -> int4: the menstruum carbonates stuck if it does not realize zinger and is immunotherapeutic.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__