the fact that the sunlamp is not structural but it is glossopharyngeal does not hold.
sent1: if something that is not a Earth is not structural then it is not glossopharyngeal. sent2: the tragacanth is a signature. sent3: if the fact that the thermistor is not retractile but it is structural is incorrect the sunlamp is not structural. sent4: the dithering is a virus. sent5: the sunlamp is glossopharyngeal if that the tragacanth concretizes Panofsky is right. sent6: the fact that the thermistor is nonretractile thing that is structural is wrong if it is a Earth. sent7: that something is not structural but it is glossopharyngeal does not hold if it is not a signature. sent8: the dithering is a heliometer. sent9: the Somalian is not epizoan but it is not non-glossopharyngeal. sent10: if something does concretize Panofsky then it is a signature. sent11: the tragacanth concretizes Panofsky if the fact that it is a signature is not wrong. sent12: the thermistor is a Earth. sent13: the tragacanth is both retractile and a sideboard. sent14: if something is not a sideboard then it is not retractile. sent15: if that the thermistor does not concretize Panofsky but it is structural is false the tragacanth is not structural. sent16: the phyllode does not concretize Panofsky. sent17: if there is something such that it is not glossopharyngeal then that the sunlamp concretizes Panofsky is not wrong. sent18: the sunlamp is not retractile. sent19: the machinery is structural. sent20: the sunlamp concretizes Panofsky. sent21: that the tragacanth is not a signature but it is glossopharyngeal is not correct. sent22: the tragacanth is not a kind of a Earth and it is not structural if there exists something such that it is not retractile. sent23: if the thermistor is non-structural the sunlamp is not non-structural. sent24: the thermistor tailors. sent25: the facsimile does not undergrow and is not non-glossopharyngeal.
sent11 & sent2 -> int1: the tragacanth does concretize Panofsky.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the sunlamp is glossopharyngeal.; sent6 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the thermistor is not retractile but structural is wrong.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the sunlamp is not structural.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the sunlamp is a signature.
sent10 -> int5: the sunlamp is a kind of a signature if it does concretize Panofsky.; sent1 -> int6: if the tragacanth is not a Earth and it is not structural then it is not glossopharyngeal.; sent14 -> int7: the thermistor is not retractile if it is not a kind of a sideboard.; sent4 & sent8 -> int8: the dithering is a virus and is a heliometer.; int8 -> int9: something is a virus and it is a kind of a heliometer.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sunlamp is not structural but it is glossopharyngeal does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a Earth is not structural then it is not glossopharyngeal. sent2: the tragacanth is a signature. sent3: if the fact that the thermistor is not retractile but it is structural is incorrect the sunlamp is not structural. sent4: the dithering is a virus. sent5: the sunlamp is glossopharyngeal if that the tragacanth concretizes Panofsky is right. sent6: the fact that the thermistor is nonretractile thing that is structural is wrong if it is a Earth. sent7: that something is not structural but it is glossopharyngeal does not hold if it is not a signature. sent8: the dithering is a heliometer. sent9: the Somalian is not epizoan but it is not non-glossopharyngeal. sent10: if something does concretize Panofsky then it is a signature. sent11: the tragacanth concretizes Panofsky if the fact that it is a signature is not wrong. sent12: the thermistor is a Earth. sent13: the tragacanth is both retractile and a sideboard. sent14: if something is not a sideboard then it is not retractile. sent15: if that the thermistor does not concretize Panofsky but it is structural is false the tragacanth is not structural. sent16: the phyllode does not concretize Panofsky. sent17: if there is something such that it is not glossopharyngeal then that the sunlamp concretizes Panofsky is not wrong. sent18: the sunlamp is not retractile. sent19: the machinery is structural. sent20: the sunlamp concretizes Panofsky. sent21: that the tragacanth is not a signature but it is glossopharyngeal is not correct. sent22: the tragacanth is not a kind of a Earth and it is not structural if there exists something such that it is not retractile. sent23: if the thermistor is non-structural the sunlamp is not non-structural. sent24: the thermistor tailors. sent25: the facsimile does not undergrow and is not non-glossopharyngeal. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent2 -> int1: the tragacanth does concretize Panofsky.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the sunlamp is glossopharyngeal.; sent6 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the thermistor is not retractile but structural is wrong.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the sunlamp is not structural.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__