that there is something such that if it is not acceptive then the fact that it is an interpreter that is trabecular is not correct is not correct.
sent1: something is a kind of an interpreter and it is not non-trabecular if it is not acceptive. sent2: the fact that something is both an interpreter and not non-trabecular does not hold if it is acceptive. sent3: the bedding is both an interpreter and trabecular if it is not acceptive. sent4: that something is an interpreter and is trabecular is not correct if it is not acceptive.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the bedding is a kind of an interpreter and it is trabecular does not hold if it is not acceptive.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not acceptive then the fact that it is an interpreter that is trabecular is not correct is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of an interpreter and it is not non-trabecular if it is not acceptive. sent2: the fact that something is both an interpreter and not non-trabecular does not hold if it is acceptive. sent3: the bedding is both an interpreter and trabecular if it is not acceptive. sent4: that something is an interpreter and is trabecular is not correct if it is not acceptive. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the bedding is a kind of an interpreter and it is trabecular does not hold if it is not acceptive.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__