if the fact that the waddle does not occur is correct then the studding worldliness does not occur and the gardening does not occur.
sent1: the non-platyrrhineness triggers that both the studding worldliness and the gardening occurs. sent2: the prejudicialness occurs. sent3: the consolidation results in that the scraping does not occur and the lining does not occur. sent4: if the maturationalness happens the sabotaging does not occur and/or the ferricness occurs. sent5: if the fact that not the carotidness but the nesting mesoderm occurs is not right then the studding worldliness does not occur. sent6: that the waddle happens is caused by the leapfrog. sent7: the maturationalness and the nesting worldliness occurs. sent8: the sabotaging does not occur if the sabotaging does not occur or the ferricness happens or both. sent9: that the dorsalness does not occur is correct. sent10: not the gardening but the platyrrhineness happens if that the sabotaging does not occur is not wrong. sent11: that the stultification does not occur is not false if that not the consolidation but the flashover occurs does not hold. sent12: that the non-carotidness and the nesting mesoderm happens leads to the leapfrog. sent13: if the maturationalness occurs either the sabotage occurs or the ferricness happens or both. sent14: if the fact that the fact that the waddle does not occur and the leapfrog happens is true is wrong the neglecting Milk does not occur. sent15: the involution does not occur and the skeet does not occur. sent16: the macrocosmicness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the carotidness but the nesting mesoderm occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the leapfrog happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the waddle happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the waddle does not occur is correct.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that that the carotidness does not occur and the nesting mesoderm happens is not right is right.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the studding worldliness does not occur.; sent7 -> int6: the maturationalness happens.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the sabotage does not occur or the ferricness occurs or both.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the sabotaging does not occur.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: not the gardening but the platyrrhine happens.; int9 -> int10: the gardening does not occur.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the studding worldliness does not occur and the gardening does not occur.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the neglecting Milk does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the waddle does not occur is correct then the studding worldliness does not occur and the gardening does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-platyrrhineness triggers that both the studding worldliness and the gardening occurs. sent2: the prejudicialness occurs. sent3: the consolidation results in that the scraping does not occur and the lining does not occur. sent4: if the maturationalness happens the sabotaging does not occur and/or the ferricness occurs. sent5: if the fact that not the carotidness but the nesting mesoderm occurs is not right then the studding worldliness does not occur. sent6: that the waddle happens is caused by the leapfrog. sent7: the maturationalness and the nesting worldliness occurs. sent8: the sabotaging does not occur if the sabotaging does not occur or the ferricness happens or both. sent9: that the dorsalness does not occur is correct. sent10: not the gardening but the platyrrhineness happens if that the sabotaging does not occur is not wrong. sent11: that the stultification does not occur is not false if that not the consolidation but the flashover occurs does not hold. sent12: that the non-carotidness and the nesting mesoderm happens leads to the leapfrog. sent13: if the maturationalness occurs either the sabotage occurs or the ferricness happens or both. sent14: if the fact that the fact that the waddle does not occur and the leapfrog happens is true is wrong the neglecting Milk does not occur. sent15: the involution does not occur and the skeet does not occur. sent16: the macrocosmicness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the carotidness but the nesting mesoderm occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the leapfrog happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the waddle happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the waddle does not occur is correct.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that that the carotidness does not occur and the nesting mesoderm happens is not right is right.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the studding worldliness does not occur.; sent7 -> int6: the maturationalness happens.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the sabotage does not occur or the ferricness occurs or both.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the sabotaging does not occur.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: not the gardening but the platyrrhine happens.; int9 -> int10: the gardening does not occur.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the studding worldliness does not occur and the gardening does not occur.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__