the fact that there is something such that it is not psychogenic but a Tenniel does not hold.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is noncellular the fact that the seal is a kind of a Yorktown and it is a coadjutor is not right. sent2: that the siskin does counterweight seal but it is not a Tenniel is not correct. sent3: something does not counterweight seal if that it is a Yorktown but not a coadjutor is not true. sent4: something is psychogenic if it is a Yorktown or not noncellular or both. sent5: that the siskin counterweights seal and is a kind of a icepick does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it does not sheathe siskin and it is untrustworthy. sent7: something is a Tenniel. sent8: if the siskin does not counterweight seal that it is a kind of a coadjutor that is not a kind of a Tenniel does not hold. sent9: if that something is a kind of blastomeric thing that does not counterweight incomprehensibility is not right then it does not refer apache. sent10: the seal does not counterweight seal if it is a coadjutor. sent11: if something is a coadjutor then it does not counterweight seal. sent12: something is psychogenic and it is a Tenniel. sent13: that the seal is a kind of a Yorktown that is not a coadjutor is false if something is noncellular. sent14: the siskin does not counterweight seal if the fact that it does counterweight seal and it is a icepick is not true. sent15: the siskin is a Tenniel. sent16: if the seal does not counterweight seal then the fact that the siskin is a Tenniel is not false. sent17: something is a Yorktown and/or it is not noncellular if the fact that it is not a coadjutor is not wrong. sent18: if the seal does not counterweight seal then the siskin is non-psychogenic thing that is a Tenniel. sent19: if something is psychogenic the fact that the seal is a coadjutor that is a Tenniel is not correct. sent20: that the seal is a Yorktown and it is a coadjutor is wrong. sent21: something is noncellular.
sent21 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the seal is a Yorktown but it is not a kind of a coadjutor is incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: the seal does not counterweight seal if the fact that it is a Yorktown and it is not a kind of a coadjutor does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the seal does not counterweight seal.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the siskin is not psychogenic and is a kind of a Tenniel.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the seal is a Steichen and non-psychogenic does not hold.
sent4 -> int5: if either the siskin is a Yorktown or it is not noncellular or both then that it is psychogenic is not false.; sent17 -> int6: the fact that if the siskin is not the coadjutor then the siskin is a kind of a Yorktown or it is not noncellular or both is true.; sent14 & sent5 -> int7: that the siskin does not counterweight seal is not incorrect.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the siskin is a kind of a coadjutor that is not a kind of a Tenniel is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is not psychogenic but a Tenniel does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is noncellular the fact that the seal is a kind of a Yorktown and it is a coadjutor is not right. sent2: that the siskin does counterweight seal but it is not a Tenniel is not correct. sent3: something does not counterweight seal if that it is a Yorktown but not a coadjutor is not true. sent4: something is psychogenic if it is a Yorktown or not noncellular or both. sent5: that the siskin counterweights seal and is a kind of a icepick does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it does not sheathe siskin and it is untrustworthy. sent7: something is a Tenniel. sent8: if the siskin does not counterweight seal that it is a kind of a coadjutor that is not a kind of a Tenniel does not hold. sent9: if that something is a kind of blastomeric thing that does not counterweight incomprehensibility is not right then it does not refer apache. sent10: the seal does not counterweight seal if it is a coadjutor. sent11: if something is a coadjutor then it does not counterweight seal. sent12: something is psychogenic and it is a Tenniel. sent13: that the seal is a kind of a Yorktown that is not a coadjutor is false if something is noncellular. sent14: the siskin does not counterweight seal if the fact that it does counterweight seal and it is a icepick is not true. sent15: the siskin is a Tenniel. sent16: if the seal does not counterweight seal then the fact that the siskin is a Tenniel is not false. sent17: something is a Yorktown and/or it is not noncellular if the fact that it is not a coadjutor is not wrong. sent18: if the seal does not counterweight seal then the siskin is non-psychogenic thing that is a Tenniel. sent19: if something is psychogenic the fact that the seal is a coadjutor that is a Tenniel is not correct. sent20: that the seal is a Yorktown and it is a coadjutor is wrong. sent21: something is noncellular. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the seal is a Yorktown but it is not a kind of a coadjutor is incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: the seal does not counterweight seal if the fact that it is a Yorktown and it is not a kind of a coadjutor does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the seal does not counterweight seal.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the siskin is not psychogenic and is a kind of a Tenniel.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__