there exists something such that if the fact that it is not over-the-counter and not a Lepus is not correct it is a Aristotelian.
sent1: if something that is not over-the-counter is not a Lepus then it is not non-Aristotelian. sent2: something is a Aristotelian if it is a Lepus. sent3: if the fact that something is not a leakiness and is not a kind of a broad is not correct it is a fistfight. sent4: if the fact that something is not a Acer and it is not a velar does not hold it is Platonistic. sent5: if that the Emmenthal is over-the-counter but not a Lepus is wrong it is a Aristotelian. sent6: something is a quadrillion if that it is not legato and it is not Pasteurian does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is a Lepus then it is a kind of a Aristotelian. sent8: if the Emmenthal is not over-the-counter and it is not a Lepus it is a kind of a Aristotelian. sent9: the Emmenthal is a Lepus if the fact that it is not a toyon and it does not mesh maze does not hold. sent10: something is a Aristotelian if that it is over-the-counter and it is not a Lepus does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is not over-the-counter and it is not a Lepus it is not non-Aristotelian. sent12: if the fact that something is not a spatiality and it does not mesh Georgetown is wrong it is electronic. sent13: if the Emmenthal is a Lepus then the fact that it is a Aristotelian hold. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is over-the-counter and it is not a Lepus is not correct then that it is a kind of a Aristotelian hold. sent15: the fact that the lobsterman is the episome if that the fact that the lobsterman does not whiff antipathy and is not over-the-counter is correct is wrong hold.
there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a Acer and it is not velar does not hold then it is Platonistic.
sent4 -> int1: that the maze is Platonistic is right if the fact that it is not a kind of a Acer and it is not a velar is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not over-the-counter and not a Lepus is not correct it is a Aristotelian. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not over-the-counter is not a Lepus then it is not non-Aristotelian. sent2: something is a Aristotelian if it is a Lepus. sent3: if the fact that something is not a leakiness and is not a kind of a broad is not correct it is a fistfight. sent4: if the fact that something is not a Acer and it is not a velar does not hold it is Platonistic. sent5: if that the Emmenthal is over-the-counter but not a Lepus is wrong it is a Aristotelian. sent6: something is a quadrillion if that it is not legato and it is not Pasteurian does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is a Lepus then it is a kind of a Aristotelian. sent8: if the Emmenthal is not over-the-counter and it is not a Lepus it is a kind of a Aristotelian. sent9: the Emmenthal is a Lepus if the fact that it is not a toyon and it does not mesh maze does not hold. sent10: something is a Aristotelian if that it is over-the-counter and it is not a Lepus does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is not over-the-counter and it is not a Lepus it is not non-Aristotelian. sent12: if the fact that something is not a spatiality and it does not mesh Georgetown is wrong it is electronic. sent13: if the Emmenthal is a Lepus then the fact that it is a Aristotelian hold. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is over-the-counter and it is not a Lepus is not correct then that it is a kind of a Aristotelian hold. sent15: the fact that the lobsterman is the episome if that the fact that the lobsterman does not whiff antipathy and is not over-the-counter is correct is wrong hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__