the fact that the restharrow is not a eutectic hold.
sent1: if something is a weeds it is a strider. sent2: the balance is a eutectic. sent3: if the pyroelectricity is quadrangular that it is a creditor and it indexes Lucy does not hold. sent4: the fact that the restharrow is a kind of a weeds that does not culture restaurant is not correct. sent5: if there exists something such that that that it is a kind of a keyhole and it does not culture directionality hold is wrong the fact that the grist is not incredible hold. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it does culture directionality and is not hemic is not correct then the restharrow is not a eutectic. sent7: the fact that everything is disciplinary and a weeds hold. sent8: there exists something such that that it colors grist and it is not a kind of a ultramontane is false. sent9: if there exists something such that it does avoid then the restharrow does not color peaked. sent10: the restharrow is a eutectic and it is disciplinary if it is not a weeds. sent11: if the balance is a kind of a pseudoscorpion the fact that it is humoral and it is a weeds is false. sent12: the lobule does culture mercury and does culture deviationism. sent13: the sandwort does culture directionality. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it cultures directionality and is hemic is wrong. sent15: if the balance is counterrevolutionary then that it cultures directionality and it is not hemic is wrong.
sent7 -> int1: the balance is disciplinary and a weeds.; int1 -> int2: that the balance is disciplinary hold.;
if the dragoon is a weeds it is a strider.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the restharrow is not a eutectic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a weeds it is a strider. sent2: the balance is a eutectic. sent3: if the pyroelectricity is quadrangular that it is a creditor and it indexes Lucy does not hold. sent4: the fact that the restharrow is a kind of a weeds that does not culture restaurant is not correct. sent5: if there exists something such that that that it is a kind of a keyhole and it does not culture directionality hold is wrong the fact that the grist is not incredible hold. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it does culture directionality and is not hemic is not correct then the restharrow is not a eutectic. sent7: the fact that everything is disciplinary and a weeds hold. sent8: there exists something such that that it colors grist and it is not a kind of a ultramontane is false. sent9: if there exists something such that it does avoid then the restharrow does not color peaked. sent10: the restharrow is a eutectic and it is disciplinary if it is not a weeds. sent11: if the balance is a kind of a pseudoscorpion the fact that it is humoral and it is a weeds is false. sent12: the lobule does culture mercury and does culture deviationism. sent13: the sandwort does culture directionality. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it cultures directionality and is hemic is wrong. sent15: if the balance is counterrevolutionary then that it cultures directionality and it is not hemic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the balance is disciplinary and a weeds.; int1 -> int2: that the balance is disciplinary hold.; __UNKNOWN__