that both the two-dimensionalness and the leapfrogging occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the two-dimensionalness occurs. sent2: that either the non-intervertebralness or the consulting or both occurs is not right. sent3: that either the non-amoristicness or the squintiness or both happens is wrong. sent4: the readmission occurs. sent5: the patience happens. sent6: that the habit does not occur yields that the playback does not occur. sent7: if the concretizing hodoscope does not occur the Crucifixion does not occur. sent8: the anger does not occur if the collegiateness and the habit happens. sent9: that the consulting does not occur and the intervertebralness does not occur prevents the non-Amharicness. sent10: if the yaws occurs the concretizing gurney does not occur but the photometry occurs. sent11: that the two-dimensionalness and the leapfrog happens is right if the Crucifixion does not occur. sent12: the aromaticness occurs. sent13: the sanitariness does not occur and/or the moreness happens. sent14: if the two-dimensionalness does not occur then the leapfrogging happens and the Crucifixion happens. sent15: if the photometry occurs and the intervertebralness happens the concretizing hodoscope does not occur. sent16: the yaws occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intervertebralness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the non-intervertebralness and/or the consulting happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the intervertebralness occurs.; sent10 & sent16 -> int4: not the concretizing gurney but the photometry happens.; int4 -> int5: the photometry occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the photometry happens and the intervertebralness happens.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the concretizing hodoscope does not occur.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the Crucifixion does not occur.; int8 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the Amharic occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that both the two-dimensionalness and the leapfrogging occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the two-dimensionalness occurs. sent2: that either the non-intervertebralness or the consulting or both occurs is not right. sent3: that either the non-amoristicness or the squintiness or both happens is wrong. sent4: the readmission occurs. sent5: the patience happens. sent6: that the habit does not occur yields that the playback does not occur. sent7: if the concretizing hodoscope does not occur the Crucifixion does not occur. sent8: the anger does not occur if the collegiateness and the habit happens. sent9: that the consulting does not occur and the intervertebralness does not occur prevents the non-Amharicness. sent10: if the yaws occurs the concretizing gurney does not occur but the photometry occurs. sent11: that the two-dimensionalness and the leapfrog happens is right if the Crucifixion does not occur. sent12: the aromaticness occurs. sent13: the sanitariness does not occur and/or the moreness happens. sent14: if the two-dimensionalness does not occur then the leapfrogging happens and the Crucifixion happens. sent15: if the photometry occurs and the intervertebralness happens the concretizing hodoscope does not occur. sent16: the yaws occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intervertebralness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the non-intervertebralness and/or the consulting happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the intervertebralness occurs.; sent10 & sent16 -> int4: not the concretizing gurney but the photometry happens.; int4 -> int5: the photometry occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the photometry happens and the intervertebralness happens.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the concretizing hodoscope does not occur.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the Crucifixion does not occur.; int8 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__