the mugging happens.
sent1: that the pressorness occurs prevents the non-synapticness. sent2: the unregretfulness occurs. sent3: the pressorness happens if the prospect happens. sent4: either the mystifying season happens or the outstaring townee does not occur or both. sent5: that not the archery but the mystifying redoubt happens is incorrect. sent6: if the population occurs the indigestibleness occurs. sent7: if the fact that either the lotto does not occur or the basalness occurs or both is incorrect then the mugging happens. sent8: the mystifying redoubt does not occur if the fact that not the archery but the mystifying redoubt occurs is not right. sent9: the mugging does not occur if the prospect does not occur and the population happens. sent10: that the mystifying baccalaureate happens is caused by the indigestibleness. sent11: the non-indigestibleness is prevented by that the population occurs or that the prospecting does not occur or both. sent12: that the unregretfulness happens triggers that the mystifying MPEG does not occur and the Eritreanness does not occur. sent13: if the mystifying redoubt does not occur then the fact that the mystifying baccalaureate and the non-Eritreanness occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prospect does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: either the population occurs or the prospect does not occur or both.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the indigestibleness occurs hold.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the mystifying baccalaureate occurs.; sent12 & sent2 -> int4: the mystifying MPEG does not occur and the Eritreanness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the Eritrean does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the mystifying baccalaureate but not the Eritreanness occurs.; sent8 & sent5 -> int7: the mystifying redoubt does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the mystifying baccalaureate occurs but the Eritreanness does not occur is not correct.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the prospect occurs.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the pressorness occurs.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the synapticness happens.;
the mugging does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the mugging happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pressorness occurs prevents the non-synapticness. sent2: the unregretfulness occurs. sent3: the pressorness happens if the prospect happens. sent4: either the mystifying season happens or the outstaring townee does not occur or both. sent5: that not the archery but the mystifying redoubt happens is incorrect. sent6: if the population occurs the indigestibleness occurs. sent7: if the fact that either the lotto does not occur or the basalness occurs or both is incorrect then the mugging happens. sent8: the mystifying redoubt does not occur if the fact that not the archery but the mystifying redoubt occurs is not right. sent9: the mugging does not occur if the prospect does not occur and the population happens. sent10: that the mystifying baccalaureate happens is caused by the indigestibleness. sent11: the non-indigestibleness is prevented by that the population occurs or that the prospecting does not occur or both. sent12: that the unregretfulness happens triggers that the mystifying MPEG does not occur and the Eritreanness does not occur. sent13: if the mystifying redoubt does not occur then the fact that the mystifying baccalaureate and the non-Eritreanness occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prospect does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: either the population occurs or the prospect does not occur or both.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the indigestibleness occurs hold.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the mystifying baccalaureate occurs.; sent12 & sent2 -> int4: the mystifying MPEG does not occur and the Eritreanness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the Eritrean does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the mystifying baccalaureate but not the Eritreanness occurs.; sent8 & sent5 -> int7: the mystifying redoubt does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the mystifying baccalaureate occurs but the Eritreanness does not occur is not correct.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the prospect occurs.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the pressorness occurs.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the synapticness happens.; __UNKNOWN__