the fact that the frail is not articulated and is efficient does not hold.
sent1: if the frail is not dactylic then that it is efficient and not incorporeal is wrong. sent2: the fact that the frail is noble and is not incorporeal is wrong if it is not efficient. sent3: the chamberlain is not multiple-choice. sent4: the frail backlogs if the psychodid is efficient. sent5: that the psychodid is a commander and does not sample Federal is not true if the chamberlain is not multiple-choice. sent6: the diskette is efficient. sent7: if the fact that the frail is noble thing that is not incorporeal is not true the psychodid is dactylic. sent8: if the frail is not efficient then that the fact that it is noble and it is incorporeal hold does not hold. sent9: the fact that the frail samples Federal but it is not noble does not hold. sent10: that something is a kind of a commander that is dactylic is not true if it does not sample Federal. sent11: if the psychodid is not incorporeal that it is dactylic and it is not noble is not right. sent12: if that something is a kind of inefficient thing that is not dactylic is wrong then it is not multiple-choice. sent13: if something does not articulate that it is not dactylic and it is not efficient is incorrect. sent14: if the frail is incorporeal the psychodid is dactylic. sent15: if the chamberlain is not multiple-choice then the fact that the psychodid is not a commander but it samples Federal is incorrect. sent16: the psychodid is not an affairs. sent17: the fact that the psychodid does not articulate is not incorrect if that it is not noble and it does not sample Federal does not hold. sent18: the fact that the frail is noble thing that is incorporeal does not hold. sent19: if the chamberlain is not multiple-choice then the fact that the fact that the psychodid is not a commander and does not sample Federal does not hold is correct. sent20: the frail is not articulated. sent21: that the psychodid is not a commander and samples Federal is not true. sent22: the fact that the psychodid is a kind of a commander but it does not sample Federal is not correct. sent23: the sarcosporidian is a kind of unarticulated thing that is missionary. sent24: if that something is not a commander and it does not sample Federal is incorrect then it is not dactylic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frail is not efficient.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the frail is noble but it is not incorporeal does not hold hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the psychodid is dactylic.; sent24 -> int3: if the fact that the psychodid is not a commander and does not sample Federal is false then it is not dactylic.; sent19 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the psychodid is not a kind of a commander and it does not sample Federal is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the psychodid is not dactylic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the frail is efficient.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
that the frail does not articulate but it is efficient does not hold.
sent10 -> int8: that the psychodid is both a commander and dactylic is incorrect if it does not sample Federal.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the frail is not articulated and is efficient does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the frail is not dactylic then that it is efficient and not incorporeal is wrong. sent2: the fact that the frail is noble and is not incorporeal is wrong if it is not efficient. sent3: the chamberlain is not multiple-choice. sent4: the frail backlogs if the psychodid is efficient. sent5: that the psychodid is a commander and does not sample Federal is not true if the chamberlain is not multiple-choice. sent6: the diskette is efficient. sent7: if the fact that the frail is noble thing that is not incorporeal is not true the psychodid is dactylic. sent8: if the frail is not efficient then that the fact that it is noble and it is incorporeal hold does not hold. sent9: the fact that the frail samples Federal but it is not noble does not hold. sent10: that something is a kind of a commander that is dactylic is not true if it does not sample Federal. sent11: if the psychodid is not incorporeal that it is dactylic and it is not noble is not right. sent12: if that something is a kind of inefficient thing that is not dactylic is wrong then it is not multiple-choice. sent13: if something does not articulate that it is not dactylic and it is not efficient is incorrect. sent14: if the frail is incorporeal the psychodid is dactylic. sent15: if the chamberlain is not multiple-choice then the fact that the psychodid is not a commander but it samples Federal is incorrect. sent16: the psychodid is not an affairs. sent17: the fact that the psychodid does not articulate is not incorrect if that it is not noble and it does not sample Federal does not hold. sent18: the fact that the frail is noble thing that is incorporeal does not hold. sent19: if the chamberlain is not multiple-choice then the fact that the fact that the psychodid is not a commander and does not sample Federal does not hold is correct. sent20: the frail is not articulated. sent21: that the psychodid is not a commander and samples Federal is not true. sent22: the fact that the psychodid is a kind of a commander but it does not sample Federal is not correct. sent23: the sarcosporidian is a kind of unarticulated thing that is missionary. sent24: if that something is not a commander and it does not sample Federal is incorrect then it is not dactylic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frail is not efficient.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the frail is noble but it is not incorporeal does not hold hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the psychodid is dactylic.; sent24 -> int3: if the fact that the psychodid is not a commander and does not sample Federal is false then it is not dactylic.; sent19 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the psychodid is not a kind of a commander and it does not sample Federal is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the psychodid is not dactylic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the frail is efficient.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__