the misdirecting occurs but the dominating Satanist does not occur.
sent1: if the organic does not occur then the tattoo does not occur. sent2: the dominating cholesterol occurs if not the tattooing but the colorimetricness happens. sent3: the interplay does not occur. sent4: if the organicness does not occur the tattoo does not occur and the colorimetricness happens. sent5: the misdirecting occurs. sent6: the dominating manana and/or the aldehydicness happens. sent7: that not the glamorizing outwardness but the organic occurs is not correct. sent8: the glamorizing outwardness does not occur if the aldehydicness happens. sent9: if the dominating manana happens the glamorizing outwardness does not occur.
sent6 & sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the glamorizing outwardness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the organicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the glamorizing outwardness does not occur and the organicness happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the organic does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: not the tattooing but the colorimetricness occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the dominating cholesterol happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the dominating cholesterol happens but the interplay does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the misdirecting occurs but the dominating Satanist does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the organic does not occur then the tattoo does not occur. sent2: the dominating cholesterol occurs if not the tattooing but the colorimetricness happens. sent3: the interplay does not occur. sent4: if the organicness does not occur the tattoo does not occur and the colorimetricness happens. sent5: the misdirecting occurs. sent6: the dominating manana and/or the aldehydicness happens. sent7: that not the glamorizing outwardness but the organic occurs is not correct. sent8: the glamorizing outwardness does not occur if the aldehydicness happens. sent9: if the dominating manana happens the glamorizing outwardness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the glamorizing outwardness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the organicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the glamorizing outwardness does not occur and the organicness happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the organic does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: not the tattooing but the colorimetricness occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the dominating cholesterol happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the dominating cholesterol happens but the interplay does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__