the fact that the xanthophyll is non-astigmatic thing that is not a TNT is false.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not a contributor. sent2: something is not astigmatic if that it is unthematic or tarries or both is not correct. sent3: if the fact that something is a TNT and does not squire hyperthermia is false then it is not a TNT. sent4: there is nothing such that it is a TNT that does not squire hyperthermia. sent5: the fact that the xanthophyll is unthematic or tarries or both is incorrect if something is not a contributor. sent6: the housewrecker is not mild if there exists something such that it is not a contributor.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: that the xanthophyll is unthematic or it does tarry or both is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: the xanthophyll is non-astigmatic if that it is unthematic and/or it tarries is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the xanthophyll is not astigmatic.; sent3 -> int4: the xanthophyll is not a TNT if the fact that it is a TNT and does not squire hyperthermia is wrong.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the xanthophyll is a kind of a TNT and does not squire hyperthermia is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the xanthophyll is not a kind of a TNT.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the xanthophyll is non-astigmatic thing that is not a TNT is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a contributor. sent2: something is not astigmatic if that it is unthematic or tarries or both is not correct. sent3: if the fact that something is a TNT and does not squire hyperthermia is false then it is not a TNT. sent4: there is nothing such that it is a TNT that does not squire hyperthermia. sent5: the fact that the xanthophyll is unthematic or tarries or both is incorrect if something is not a contributor. sent6: the housewrecker is not mild if there exists something such that it is not a contributor. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: that the xanthophyll is unthematic or it does tarry or both is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: the xanthophyll is non-astigmatic if that it is unthematic and/or it tarries is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the xanthophyll is not astigmatic.; sent3 -> int4: the xanthophyll is not a TNT if the fact that it is a TNT and does not squire hyperthermia is wrong.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the xanthophyll is a kind of a TNT and does not squire hyperthermia is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the xanthophyll is not a kind of a TNT.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__