the Quapaw is ponderable.
sent1: the declination is not a hull if the codetalker is non-fundamentalist thing that is not limnological. sent2: the sex is fundamentalist if the Quapaw is not limnological and not a hull. sent3: the declination is not a Tinbergen. sent4: something is ponderable and it does awe Gloucestershire if the fact that it is not a colophon is true. sent5: the fact that the filtrate is not exocentric and/or it does awe Gloucestershire is false if the fact that the Fijian is not an iterative is false. sent6: if there exists something such that it is exteroceptive the Quapaw is not a hull. sent7: that either the declination is not exocentric or it is an iterative or both is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Tinbergen. sent8: the Fijian is not a Saxon. sent9: there exists something such that that it is exteroceptive is right. sent10: if the meatloaf is a hybridoma the crowbar is a kind of a hybridoma. sent11: if the declination is not a hull that the sex is ponderable but it is not exteroceptive is incorrect. sent12: the codetalker is not fundamentalist and it is not limnological if the crowbar is a kind of a hybridoma. sent13: the sex is not a kind of a fundamentalist if there exists something such that the fact that it is not exocentric or an iterative or both is not right. sent14: the fact that the Quapaw is not ponderable is true if the fact that the sex is both not ponderable and not exteroceptive is false. sent15: that something is not weatherly or androgenic or both is incorrect if it does not dull. sent16: if something is not a colophon it is a kind of a hybridoma. sent17: if something is a kind of non-Saxon thing that is not a Tinbergen then it is an iterative.
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Quapaw is not a hull is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Quapaw is not limnological.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Quapaw is not limnological and it is not a kind of a hull.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the sex is a fundamentalist.; sent7 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the declination is not exocentric and/or it is an iterative does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not exocentric and/or is an iterative is not correct.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the sex is not a fundamentalist.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Quapaw is limnological.; int8 -> int9: the Quapaw is limnological and/or a hybridoma.; sent4 -> int10: if that the Quapaw is not a kind of a colophon hold it is ponderable and it does awe Gloucestershire.;
the Quapaw is not ponderable.
sent16 -> int11: the meatloaf is a hybridoma if it is not a colophon.; sent17 -> int12: if the Fijian is a kind of non-Saxon thing that is not a kind of a Tinbergen it is a kind of an iterative.;
$hypothesis$ = the Quapaw is ponderable. ; $context$ = sent1: the declination is not a hull if the codetalker is non-fundamentalist thing that is not limnological. sent2: the sex is fundamentalist if the Quapaw is not limnological and not a hull. sent3: the declination is not a Tinbergen. sent4: something is ponderable and it does awe Gloucestershire if the fact that it is not a colophon is true. sent5: the fact that the filtrate is not exocentric and/or it does awe Gloucestershire is false if the fact that the Fijian is not an iterative is false. sent6: if there exists something such that it is exteroceptive the Quapaw is not a hull. sent7: that either the declination is not exocentric or it is an iterative or both is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Tinbergen. sent8: the Fijian is not a Saxon. sent9: there exists something such that that it is exteroceptive is right. sent10: if the meatloaf is a hybridoma the crowbar is a kind of a hybridoma. sent11: if the declination is not a hull that the sex is ponderable but it is not exteroceptive is incorrect. sent12: the codetalker is not fundamentalist and it is not limnological if the crowbar is a kind of a hybridoma. sent13: the sex is not a kind of a fundamentalist if there exists something such that the fact that it is not exocentric or an iterative or both is not right. sent14: the fact that the Quapaw is not ponderable is true if the fact that the sex is both not ponderable and not exteroceptive is false. sent15: that something is not weatherly or androgenic or both is incorrect if it does not dull. sent16: if something is not a colophon it is a kind of a hybridoma. sent17: if something is a kind of non-Saxon thing that is not a Tinbergen then it is an iterative. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Quapaw is not a hull is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Quapaw is not limnological.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Quapaw is not limnological and it is not a kind of a hull.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the sex is a fundamentalist.; sent7 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the declination is not exocentric and/or it is an iterative does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not exocentric and/or is an iterative is not correct.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the sex is not a fundamentalist.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Quapaw is limnological.; int8 -> int9: the Quapaw is limnological and/or a hybridoma.; sent4 -> int10: if that the Quapaw is not a kind of a colophon hold it is ponderable and it does awe Gloucestershire.; __UNKNOWN__