if the clinging occurs then the pecticness happens but the granulomatousness does not occur.
sent1: that the devising occurs prevents that the ferricness does not occur. sent2: the Rhodesianness happens. sent3: the benediction occurs. sent4: the devising and/or that the cross-sectionalness occurs is caused by that the stylelessness does not occur. sent5: if the anthropometry occurs then the thermoelectricness occurs but the processing Raphicerus does not occur. sent6: if the ferricness happens then the pecticness occurs. sent7: the corruptingness occurs if the processing anthropocentrism occurs. sent8: that the processing Todus does not occur is caused by that the guaranteeing beneficiary and the canvassing occurs. sent9: the ferricness happens if the cross-sectionalness occurs. sent10: the granulomatousness is prevented by that both the spraying and the clinging happens. sent11: if the pecticness does not occur the granulomatousness does not occur and the cling happens. sent12: the stylelessness does not occur. sent13: the spray is prevented by that the cling does not occur. sent14: the fact that the erythroidness happens is true if the dissenting Gilgamesh happens. sent15: the keratinizing happens. sent16: if the pass happens the Parthian occurs. sent17: that the Rhodesianness happens leads to that the spraying occurs.
sent17 & sent2 -> int1: the spray occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cling happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the spraying occurs and the cling occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the granulomatousness does not occur.; sent4 & sent12 -> int4: either the devising happens or the cross-sectionalness happens or both.; int4 & sent1 & sent9 -> int5: the ferricness occurs.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the pecticness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the pecticness but not the granulomatousness happens.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the unworldliness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the clinging occurs then the pecticness happens but the granulomatousness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the devising occurs prevents that the ferricness does not occur. sent2: the Rhodesianness happens. sent3: the benediction occurs. sent4: the devising and/or that the cross-sectionalness occurs is caused by that the stylelessness does not occur. sent5: if the anthropometry occurs then the thermoelectricness occurs but the processing Raphicerus does not occur. sent6: if the ferricness happens then the pecticness occurs. sent7: the corruptingness occurs if the processing anthropocentrism occurs. sent8: that the processing Todus does not occur is caused by that the guaranteeing beneficiary and the canvassing occurs. sent9: the ferricness happens if the cross-sectionalness occurs. sent10: the granulomatousness is prevented by that both the spraying and the clinging happens. sent11: if the pecticness does not occur the granulomatousness does not occur and the cling happens. sent12: the stylelessness does not occur. sent13: the spray is prevented by that the cling does not occur. sent14: the fact that the erythroidness happens is true if the dissenting Gilgamesh happens. sent15: the keratinizing happens. sent16: if the pass happens the Parthian occurs. sent17: that the Rhodesianness happens leads to that the spraying occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent2 -> int1: the spray occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cling happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the spraying occurs and the cling occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the granulomatousness does not occur.; sent4 & sent12 -> int4: either the devising happens or the cross-sectionalness happens or both.; int4 & sent1 & sent9 -> int5: the ferricness occurs.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the pecticness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the pecticness but not the granulomatousness happens.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__