that either the besoting oblateness happens or the subrogating driftwood happens or both if the additiveness does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the besoting oblateness and/or the subrogating driftwood occurs if the additive happens. sent2: the fact that the inconvenientness does not occur and the rewarding does not occur is not correct if the additive does not occur. sent3: the fact that not the caution but the finalization occurs does not hold if the Niloticness happens. sent4: if that the inconvenientness does not occur and the rewarding does not occur is wrong the besoting oblateness occurs. sent5: the fact that the inconvenientness does not occur and the rewarding does not occur is incorrect if the additiveness happens. sent6: not the besoting oblateness but the subrogating driftwood occurs if the fact that the crosscheck happens hold. sent7: if that the additiveness does not occur is right then that the inconvenientness occurs but the reward does not occur is false. sent8: if that not the caution but the finalization occurs is not correct then the bundling solfege does not occur. sent9: the distrustfulness and the Nilotic occurs if the fact that the besoting Irenaeus does not occur is right. sent10: the fact that the servileness happens and the additiveness happens is wrong if the besoting oblateness does not occur. sent11: that the non-inconvenientness and the reward happens does not hold if the additiveness does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the servileness and the additive happens is false the servileness does not occur. sent13: the besoting Irenaeus does not occur if the lysogenizing denudation does not occur. sent14: that the crosscheck happens and the illativeness occurs is brought about by that the bundling solfege does not occur. sent15: if the bundling decree occurs the unmodifiableness does not occur and the lysogenizing denudation does not occur. sent16: the fact that the inconvenientness occurs but the reward does not occur is false. sent17: the fact that not the inconvenientness but the reward occurs does not hold. sent18: if the besoting oiled happens that the cataphaticness does not occur and the shooting does not occur is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the additive does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that the inconvenientness does not occur and the reward does not occur is correct is false.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the besoting oblateness occurs.; int2 -> int3: either the besoting oblateness or the subrogating driftwood or both happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the servileness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that either the besoting oblateness happens or the subrogating driftwood happens or both if the additiveness does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the besoting oblateness and/or the subrogating driftwood occurs if the additive happens. sent2: the fact that the inconvenientness does not occur and the rewarding does not occur is not correct if the additive does not occur. sent3: the fact that not the caution but the finalization occurs does not hold if the Niloticness happens. sent4: if that the inconvenientness does not occur and the rewarding does not occur is wrong the besoting oblateness occurs. sent5: the fact that the inconvenientness does not occur and the rewarding does not occur is incorrect if the additiveness happens. sent6: not the besoting oblateness but the subrogating driftwood occurs if the fact that the crosscheck happens hold. sent7: if that the additiveness does not occur is right then that the inconvenientness occurs but the reward does not occur is false. sent8: if that not the caution but the finalization occurs is not correct then the bundling solfege does not occur. sent9: the distrustfulness and the Nilotic occurs if the fact that the besoting Irenaeus does not occur is right. sent10: the fact that the servileness happens and the additiveness happens is wrong if the besoting oblateness does not occur. sent11: that the non-inconvenientness and the reward happens does not hold if the additiveness does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the servileness and the additive happens is false the servileness does not occur. sent13: the besoting Irenaeus does not occur if the lysogenizing denudation does not occur. sent14: that the crosscheck happens and the illativeness occurs is brought about by that the bundling solfege does not occur. sent15: if the bundling decree occurs the unmodifiableness does not occur and the lysogenizing denudation does not occur. sent16: the fact that the inconvenientness occurs but the reward does not occur is false. sent17: the fact that not the inconvenientness but the reward occurs does not hold. sent18: if the besoting oiled happens that the cataphaticness does not occur and the shooting does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the additive does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that the inconvenientness does not occur and the reward does not occur is correct is false.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the besoting oblateness occurs.; int2 -> int3: either the besoting oblateness or the subrogating driftwood or both happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__