the ethnologist is not a kind of a gramophone.
sent1: something is not a loon but it spectates if it is a gramophone. sent2: the quintessence does not clink baneberry if the hemiplegic is not a flotation. sent3: something is a loon if the fact that it is not a loon and it is a fumigation does not hold. sent4: the borosilicate does clink baneberry and it does spectate if the quintessence does not clink baneberry. sent5: the ethnologist is existential if the fact that the cynancum is not a kind of a laminate and/or is collapsible is not right. sent6: that something is a flotation and leptorrhine if it does not clink baneberry hold. sent7: if the hemiplegic is not Bohemian the borosilicate is not a kind of a flotation. sent8: the quintessence is a Elamite. sent9: the fact that the cynancum is either not a laminate or collapsible or both is not correct if that it does not sneer commonalty hold. sent10: something is not a flotation but it is a gramophone if it is not leptorrhine. sent11: that the ethnologist does not clink baneberry and it does not spectate is not true if the hemiplegic is not a loon. sent12: the hemiplegic is both not a flotation and not leptorrhine. sent13: the fact that the borosilicate is not a sling and is idiomatic is not true if that the hemiplegic is a flotation hold. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a callus that is not an eccentric is not true then the quintessence is racial. sent15: that that the borosilicate is not a loon but it is a fumigation is true is false if it is a kind of a Bohemian. sent16: if something is racial then it is a kind of a fumigation. sent17: if the fact that something does not clink baneberry and does not spectate is not correct then it clink baneberry. sent18: that something is a callus and not an eccentric is incorrect if it is existential. sent19: if the quintessence is a kind of a fumigation that the hemiplegic is Bohemian is true. sent20: the cynancum does not sneer commonalty. sent21: the ethnologist is not a kind of a gramophone if the borosilicate does clink baneberry and is a loon.
sent12 -> int1: that the hemiplegic is not a flotation is correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the quintessence does not clink baneberry.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the borosilicate clinks baneberry and spectates.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the borosilicate does clink baneberry is right.; sent3 -> int5: the borosilicate is a kind of a loon if the fact that it is not a loon but a fumigation does not hold.;
that the borosilicate is not a sling and is idiomatic does not hold.
sent6 -> int6: the hemiplegic is a kind of a flotation and it is not non-leptorrhine if it does not clink baneberry.; sent1 -> int7: the hemiplegic is not a loon but it spectates if it is a gramophone.; sent16 -> int8: the fact that the quintessence is a fumigation is not wrong if that it is racial is true.; sent18 -> int9: if the ethnologist is existential then that it is a callus and it is not an eccentric is not true.; sent9 & sent20 -> int10: that the cynancum is not a kind of a laminate or it is collapsible or both is not right.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the ethnologist is existential.; int9 & int11 -> int12: that the ethnologist is a callus that is not eccentric is incorrect.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is a callus that is not an eccentric is false.; int13 & sent14 -> int14: the quintessence is not nonracial.; int8 & int14 -> int15: that the quintessence is a kind of a fumigation is not incorrect.; sent19 & int15 -> int16: the hemiplegic is a Bohemian.;
$hypothesis$ = the ethnologist is not a kind of a gramophone. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a loon but it spectates if it is a gramophone. sent2: the quintessence does not clink baneberry if the hemiplegic is not a flotation. sent3: something is a loon if the fact that it is not a loon and it is a fumigation does not hold. sent4: the borosilicate does clink baneberry and it does spectate if the quintessence does not clink baneberry. sent5: the ethnologist is existential if the fact that the cynancum is not a kind of a laminate and/or is collapsible is not right. sent6: that something is a flotation and leptorrhine if it does not clink baneberry hold. sent7: if the hemiplegic is not Bohemian the borosilicate is not a kind of a flotation. sent8: the quintessence is a Elamite. sent9: the fact that the cynancum is either not a laminate or collapsible or both is not correct if that it does not sneer commonalty hold. sent10: something is not a flotation but it is a gramophone if it is not leptorrhine. sent11: that the ethnologist does not clink baneberry and it does not spectate is not true if the hemiplegic is not a loon. sent12: the hemiplegic is both not a flotation and not leptorrhine. sent13: the fact that the borosilicate is not a sling and is idiomatic is not true if that the hemiplegic is a flotation hold. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a callus that is not an eccentric is not true then the quintessence is racial. sent15: that that the borosilicate is not a loon but it is a fumigation is true is false if it is a kind of a Bohemian. sent16: if something is racial then it is a kind of a fumigation. sent17: if the fact that something does not clink baneberry and does not spectate is not correct then it clink baneberry. sent18: that something is a callus and not an eccentric is incorrect if it is existential. sent19: if the quintessence is a kind of a fumigation that the hemiplegic is Bohemian is true. sent20: the cynancum does not sneer commonalty. sent21: the ethnologist is not a kind of a gramophone if the borosilicate does clink baneberry and is a loon. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: that the hemiplegic is not a flotation is correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the quintessence does not clink baneberry.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the borosilicate clinks baneberry and spectates.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the borosilicate does clink baneberry is right.; sent3 -> int5: the borosilicate is a kind of a loon if the fact that it is not a loon but a fumigation does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__