that if the still is a cursed then the fact that the disaccharide is not pleural and it is non-Jovian is false does not hold.
sent1: if the daisybush is a kip then the still is a kip. sent2: if that either the Lutheran does not right or it is a kip or both is not right the daisybush is a kind of a kip. sent3: if something is not a checkbook it is both not pleural and not Jovian. sent4: if something is not a checkbook that it is pleural and not Jovian is false. sent5: if the disaccharide is not a checkbook then the fact that it is both not non-pleural and not Jovian is wrong. sent6: if the still curses then that the disaccharide is pleural but it is not Jovian is incorrect. sent7: that the disaccharide is not pleural but it is Jovian is not correct if the still does curse. sent8: the fact that something is non-pleural thing that is not Jovian is incorrect if it is not a checkbook. sent9: the disaccharide is both non-pleural and non-Jovian. sent10: there exists something such that that it does predate is not wrong. sent11: if that something is a kind of a cursed and/or it is a checkbook is wrong it is not Jovian. sent12: if something is not a checkbook then the fact that it is not pleural and it is Jovian is false. sent13: that the Lutheran is not hircine is true. sent14: the still is not a cursed if there exists something such that it is a checkbook. sent15: the still is not Hippocratic. sent16: the fact that the disaccharide is pleural and is not Jovian is incorrect. sent17: the disaccharide is not pleural and not Jovian if it is not a checkbook. sent18: the fact that something does not right or is a kip or both is wrong if it is non-hircine. sent19: if the disaccharide is not a checkbook then the fact that it is not pleural and it is Jovian does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disaccharide is a checkbook.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a checkbook.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the still is not a cursed.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the still does curse.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the disaccharide is not a kind of a checkbook.; sent8 -> int5: that that the disaccharide is not pleural and not Jovian is not incorrect is false if the fact that it is not a checkbook hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the disaccharide is both not pleural and not Jovian is false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the putrescine is not Jovian.
sent11 -> int7: if the fact that the putrescine is a cursed or it is a checkbook or both is false then it is not Jovian.; sent18 -> int8: if the Lutheran is not hircine that it is not a right or is a kip or both does not hold.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the fact that the Lutheran is non-right and/or a kip is not true.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the daisybush is a kip.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the still is a kind of a kip.; int11 & sent15 -> int12: the still is a kind of a kip and is not Hippocratic.; int12 -> int13: something is a kip and not Hippocratic.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the still is a cursed then the fact that the disaccharide is not pleural and it is non-Jovian is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the daisybush is a kip then the still is a kip. sent2: if that either the Lutheran does not right or it is a kip or both is not right the daisybush is a kind of a kip. sent3: if something is not a checkbook it is both not pleural and not Jovian. sent4: if something is not a checkbook that it is pleural and not Jovian is false. sent5: if the disaccharide is not a checkbook then the fact that it is both not non-pleural and not Jovian is wrong. sent6: if the still curses then that the disaccharide is pleural but it is not Jovian is incorrect. sent7: that the disaccharide is not pleural but it is Jovian is not correct if the still does curse. sent8: the fact that something is non-pleural thing that is not Jovian is incorrect if it is not a checkbook. sent9: the disaccharide is both non-pleural and non-Jovian. sent10: there exists something such that that it does predate is not wrong. sent11: if that something is a kind of a cursed and/or it is a checkbook is wrong it is not Jovian. sent12: if something is not a checkbook then the fact that it is not pleural and it is Jovian is false. sent13: that the Lutheran is not hircine is true. sent14: the still is not a cursed if there exists something such that it is a checkbook. sent15: the still is not Hippocratic. sent16: the fact that the disaccharide is pleural and is not Jovian is incorrect. sent17: the disaccharide is not pleural and not Jovian if it is not a checkbook. sent18: the fact that something does not right or is a kip or both is wrong if it is non-hircine. sent19: if the disaccharide is not a checkbook then the fact that it is not pleural and it is Jovian does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disaccharide is a checkbook.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a checkbook.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the still is not a cursed.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the still does curse.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the disaccharide is not a kind of a checkbook.; sent8 -> int5: that that the disaccharide is not pleural and not Jovian is not incorrect is false if the fact that it is not a checkbook hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the disaccharide is both not pleural and not Jovian is false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__