the transplant is striate.
sent1: if the photocopier does not justify deviationist but it justifies wicker then the fact that the Ranger does not housekeep Poecilocapsus is true. sent2: the fact that the deviationist justifies wicker or is not Solomonic or both is not right. sent3: the photocopier is not Solomonic if that the deviationist does justify wicker and/or is not Solomonic is incorrect. sent4: the deviationist does not justify wicker. sent5: the fact that the photocopier is Solomonic is not wrong if the Ranger is bold. sent6: the transplant is striate if the fact that the Ranger is not bold is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something is both Solomonic and bold does not hold if the fact that it does not housekeep Poecilocapsus is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ranger is bold.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the photocopier is Solomonic.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the photocopier is not Solomonic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Ranger is not bold is correct.; int4 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the beta-adrenoceptor does not striate.
sent7 -> int5: if the Ranger does not housekeep Poecilocapsus then that it is Solomonic and bold is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the transplant is striate. ; $context$ = sent1: if the photocopier does not justify deviationist but it justifies wicker then the fact that the Ranger does not housekeep Poecilocapsus is true. sent2: the fact that the deviationist justifies wicker or is not Solomonic or both is not right. sent3: the photocopier is not Solomonic if that the deviationist does justify wicker and/or is not Solomonic is incorrect. sent4: the deviationist does not justify wicker. sent5: the fact that the photocopier is Solomonic is not wrong if the Ranger is bold. sent6: the transplant is striate if the fact that the Ranger is not bold is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something is both Solomonic and bold does not hold if the fact that it does not housekeep Poecilocapsus is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ranger is bold.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the photocopier is Solomonic.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the photocopier is not Solomonic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Ranger is not bold is correct.; int4 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__