the slacking does not occur and the preparation does not occur.
sent1: that the command and the subtilizing phytochemistry occurs is not right. sent2: if the fact that both the preparation and the non-mnemonicsness occurs is not correct then the preparation does not occur. sent3: the festooning aptitude does not occur. sent4: the fixating does not occur if the fact that not the tracklessness but the taekwondo happens does not hold. sent5: the qualitativeness does not occur. sent6: the Stravinskyanness does not occur. sent7: the pyrrhic does not occur. sent8: if the comparing happens the Britannicness occurs. sent9: that the comparing does not occur is prevented by that the taekwondo occurs. sent10: the fact that the preparation and the non-mnemonicsness happens is not correct. sent11: that the comparing does not occur is caused by that the Britannicness but not the slacks happens. sent12: that the uricosuricness but not the fixating happens is not right. sent13: that the stranding Forseti does not occur is correct. sent14: if that the stranding correctness and the non-wideness occurs is incorrect then the taekwondo happens. sent15: the awe happens if the fact that the mismanaging occurs and the recursion does not occur does not hold. sent16: the Britannicness does not occur. sent17: the genocide does not occur and the planetariness does not occur. sent18: if the tracklessness occurs then the fact that the slacking does not occur is correct. sent19: that the stranding Wyeth but not the pyrrhic happens is not true. sent20: the fact that the cormousness occurs is right if that the supernaturalness happens is right. sent21: that the kittee occurs and the stranding impetigo happens is wrong if the tabling does not occur. sent22: the stranding Hygrophorus does not occur and the skin-dive does not occur. sent23: the clannishness does not occur if the fact that the clannishness happens and the alkalimetry does not occur does not hold. sent24: that the carotidness happens and the Ukrainian happens is false. sent25: the Britannicness but not the slacks happens if the fact that the festooning clawfoot happens is not wrong. sent26: if the tracklessness does not occur that both the stranding correctness and the non-wideness happens is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tracklessness does not occur.; sent26 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the stranding correctness but not the wideness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the taekwondo occurs.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the comparing happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the Britannicness occurs.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the tracklessness occurs.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the fact that the slacks does not occur is correct.; sent2 & sent10 -> int8: the preparation does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the slacks does not occur and the preparation does not occur does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the slacking does not occur and the preparation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the command and the subtilizing phytochemistry occurs is not right. sent2: if the fact that both the preparation and the non-mnemonicsness occurs is not correct then the preparation does not occur. sent3: the festooning aptitude does not occur. sent4: the fixating does not occur if the fact that not the tracklessness but the taekwondo happens does not hold. sent5: the qualitativeness does not occur. sent6: the Stravinskyanness does not occur. sent7: the pyrrhic does not occur. sent8: if the comparing happens the Britannicness occurs. sent9: that the comparing does not occur is prevented by that the taekwondo occurs. sent10: the fact that the preparation and the non-mnemonicsness happens is not correct. sent11: that the comparing does not occur is caused by that the Britannicness but not the slacks happens. sent12: that the uricosuricness but not the fixating happens is not right. sent13: that the stranding Forseti does not occur is correct. sent14: if that the stranding correctness and the non-wideness occurs is incorrect then the taekwondo happens. sent15: the awe happens if the fact that the mismanaging occurs and the recursion does not occur does not hold. sent16: the Britannicness does not occur. sent17: the genocide does not occur and the planetariness does not occur. sent18: if the tracklessness occurs then the fact that the slacking does not occur is correct. sent19: that the stranding Wyeth but not the pyrrhic happens is not true. sent20: the fact that the cormousness occurs is right if that the supernaturalness happens is right. sent21: that the kittee occurs and the stranding impetigo happens is wrong if the tabling does not occur. sent22: the stranding Hygrophorus does not occur and the skin-dive does not occur. sent23: the clannishness does not occur if the fact that the clannishness happens and the alkalimetry does not occur does not hold. sent24: that the carotidness happens and the Ukrainian happens is false. sent25: the Britannicness but not the slacks happens if the fact that the festooning clawfoot happens is not wrong. sent26: if the tracklessness does not occur that both the stranding correctness and the non-wideness happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tracklessness does not occur.; sent26 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the stranding correctness but not the wideness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the taekwondo occurs.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the comparing happens.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the Britannicness occurs.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the tracklessness occurs.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the fact that the slacks does not occur is correct.; sent2 & sent10 -> int8: the preparation does not occur.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__