there exists something such that it is not a kind of a urbanity.
sent1: the gasfield is a Polynesian if it is a childcare. sent2: if that the equipment does not nose equipment and does not nose paca is wrong the omnibus does nose paca. sent3: the fact that the gasfield is a kind of a childcare and noses paca is false. sent4: something is a urbanity. sent5: if the antiproton is a devise it is not a kind of a Polynesian and it is quintessential. sent6: something is a kind of a Polynesian if it is a childcare. sent7: the equipment is not quintessential. sent8: the gasfield is not a kind of a urbanity if it is not a kind of a childcare and noses paca. sent9: if the fact that something is Polynesian and it is a kind of a urbanity is not true then it is not Polynesian. sent10: if the withe is a devise that is quintessential the ball-buster is not quintessential. sent11: that the gasfield is quintessential if the equipment does nose paca hold. sent12: if something is prismatic then it is a kind of a gendarme. sent13: the thermel is not quintessential. sent14: something is a kind of a Polynesian if the fact that it is not a childcare and it noses paca is not true. sent15: if the withe is not a urbanity then it is a devise and it is quintessential. sent16: if the gasfield is a kind of a childcare and it does nose paca then it is not a urbanity. sent17: if the ball-buster is a paste-up and not a hedonism then the antiproton does devise. sent18: something is not centromeric. sent19: the ball-buster is a paste-up and is not a hedonism. sent20: the gasfield is not a childcare. sent21: something that is Polynesian noses equipment. sent22: there is something such that the fact that it is a urbanity and it is a paste-up does not hold.
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the fact that the gasfield is not a childcare and noses paca is right does not hold it is a Polynesian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gasfield is not a childcare but it noses paca is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gasfield is a Polynesian.; sent21 -> int3: the gasfield noses equipment if that it is a Polynesian is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the gasfield does nose equipment.;
the equipment does not mother.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is not a kind of a urbanity. ; $context$ = sent1: the gasfield is a Polynesian if it is a childcare. sent2: if that the equipment does not nose equipment and does not nose paca is wrong the omnibus does nose paca. sent3: the fact that the gasfield is a kind of a childcare and noses paca is false. sent4: something is a urbanity. sent5: if the antiproton is a devise it is not a kind of a Polynesian and it is quintessential. sent6: something is a kind of a Polynesian if it is a childcare. sent7: the equipment is not quintessential. sent8: the gasfield is not a kind of a urbanity if it is not a kind of a childcare and noses paca. sent9: if the fact that something is Polynesian and it is a kind of a urbanity is not true then it is not Polynesian. sent10: if the withe is a devise that is quintessential the ball-buster is not quintessential. sent11: that the gasfield is quintessential if the equipment does nose paca hold. sent12: if something is prismatic then it is a kind of a gendarme. sent13: the thermel is not quintessential. sent14: something is a kind of a Polynesian if the fact that it is not a childcare and it noses paca is not true. sent15: if the withe is not a urbanity then it is a devise and it is quintessential. sent16: if the gasfield is a kind of a childcare and it does nose paca then it is not a urbanity. sent17: if the ball-buster is a paste-up and not a hedonism then the antiproton does devise. sent18: something is not centromeric. sent19: the ball-buster is a paste-up and is not a hedonism. sent20: the gasfield is not a childcare. sent21: something that is Polynesian noses equipment. sent22: there is something such that the fact that it is a urbanity and it is a paste-up does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the fact that the gasfield is not a childcare and noses paca is right does not hold it is a Polynesian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gasfield is not a childcare but it noses paca is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gasfield is a Polynesian.; sent21 -> int3: the gasfield noses equipment if that it is a Polynesian is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the gasfield does nose equipment.; __UNKNOWN__