the fact that the Nightingale does not kennel protuberance and/or it does hallucinate is incorrect if the AAS is not outer.
sent1: if the underlip is not a bonyness the thorax is a bonyness. sent2: if something is a kind of a umber that either it is outer or it is not nonfunctional or both does not hold. sent3: that the Nightingale does kennel protuberance or it does hallucinate or both is not true if the AAS is not outer. sent4: the fact that the Nightingale is not a bonyness or it does kennel protuberance or both is wrong. sent5: the AAS is a bonyness if the underlip is outer. sent6: the AAS is outer if something that is not nonfunctional is a bonyness. sent7: the fact that if either the Nightingale does kennel protuberance or it does hallucinate or both then the loligo muckrakes is right. sent8: the thorax does not trisect sovereign if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of discomycetous thing that trisect sovereign is not false does not hold. sent9: if the Nightingale is not nonfunctional then the mugwump is a kind of a bonyness and does muckrake. sent10: something is a bonyness. sent11: that the loligo muckrakes if the Nightingale either does not kennel protuberance or does hallucinate or both is not false. sent12: the fact that the underlip is not a bonyness is not wrong if the loligo muckrakes. sent13: the fact that the munch is not noticeable or smokeless or both is not right if the measure is not undrinkable. sent14: something does not muckrake but it does kennel protuberance. sent15: if the munch does not kennel hind then the fact that the AAS is discomycetous thing that trisects sovereign is not correct. sent16: there is something such that it is nonfunctional and it is a kind of a bonyness. sent17: the measure is not undrinkable. sent18: the arrack is not nonfunctional. sent19: the Nightingale is not nonfunctional if the fact that the loligo either is not non-outer or is not nonfunctional or both does not hold. sent20: the drill is non-outer and a megaspore. sent21: if that something is not noticeable and/or is smokeless is wrong it does not kennel hind. sent22: if the thorax does not trisect sovereign the underlip does not muscle and regulates.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Nightingale either does not kennel protuberance or does hallucinate or both.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the loligo muckrakes.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the underlip is not a bonyness hold.;
the fact that the mugwump is a bonyness is true.
sent2 -> int3: if the loligo is a umber then the fact that it is outer or it is not nonfunctional or both is not correct.; sent21 -> int4: if that the munch is not noticeable or it is smokeless or both is not true it does not kennel hind.; sent13 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the munch is unnoticeable and/or not non-smokeless is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the munch does not kennel hind.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: that the AAS is discomycetous and it trisects sovereign is not right.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it is discomycetous and does trisect sovereign is incorrect.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the thorax does not trisect sovereign.; sent22 & int9 -> int10: the underlip does not muscle and regulates.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a muscle and it regulates.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Nightingale does not kennel protuberance and/or it does hallucinate is incorrect if the AAS is not outer. ; $context$ = sent1: if the underlip is not a bonyness the thorax is a bonyness. sent2: if something is a kind of a umber that either it is outer or it is not nonfunctional or both does not hold. sent3: that the Nightingale does kennel protuberance or it does hallucinate or both is not true if the AAS is not outer. sent4: the fact that the Nightingale is not a bonyness or it does kennel protuberance or both is wrong. sent5: the AAS is a bonyness if the underlip is outer. sent6: the AAS is outer if something that is not nonfunctional is a bonyness. sent7: the fact that if either the Nightingale does kennel protuberance or it does hallucinate or both then the loligo muckrakes is right. sent8: the thorax does not trisect sovereign if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of discomycetous thing that trisect sovereign is not false does not hold. sent9: if the Nightingale is not nonfunctional then the mugwump is a kind of a bonyness and does muckrake. sent10: something is a bonyness. sent11: that the loligo muckrakes if the Nightingale either does not kennel protuberance or does hallucinate or both is not false. sent12: the fact that the underlip is not a bonyness is not wrong if the loligo muckrakes. sent13: the fact that the munch is not noticeable or smokeless or both is not right if the measure is not undrinkable. sent14: something does not muckrake but it does kennel protuberance. sent15: if the munch does not kennel hind then the fact that the AAS is discomycetous thing that trisects sovereign is not correct. sent16: there is something such that it is nonfunctional and it is a kind of a bonyness. sent17: the measure is not undrinkable. sent18: the arrack is not nonfunctional. sent19: the Nightingale is not nonfunctional if the fact that the loligo either is not non-outer or is not nonfunctional or both does not hold. sent20: the drill is non-outer and a megaspore. sent21: if that something is not noticeable and/or is smokeless is wrong it does not kennel hind. sent22: if the thorax does not trisect sovereign the underlip does not muscle and regulates. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Nightingale either does not kennel protuberance or does hallucinate or both.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the loligo muckrakes.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the underlip is not a bonyness hold.; __UNKNOWN__