the disinfestation happens.
sent1: if the fact that not the exaggeration but the blandishment happens does not hold the acanthoticness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the misgovernment does not occur and the risking does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the serousness does not occur and the smocking range does not occur the risk does not occur. sent4: the decanting happens. sent5: if the exaggeration does not occur then that the unction does not occur and the Andorranness does not occur is not correct. sent6: the fact that that the junction does not occur and the vandalism happens is correct results in the non-armlessness. sent7: if the effleurage happens the sphericalness does not occur. sent8: that the blandishment does not occur and/or the exaggeration does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the Andorran happens is true. sent9: if the fact that the misgovernment does not occur and the risk does not occur is not true then that the reordering does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: that the dicarboxylicness occurs and the spilling wall occurs is correct. sent11: the fact that the blandishment does not occur if the effleurage does not occur but the exaggeration occurs hold. sent12: the paganizing does not occur if the fact that either the blandishment does not occur or the exaggeration does not occur or both does not hold. sent13: that that the lupineness and the non-acanthoticness occurs is false is not false if the dilapidating meanie does not occur. sent14: the blandishment and the sexagesimalness occurs if that the reordering does not occur is not wrong. sent15: the effleurage does not occur and the paganizing does not occur. sent16: the Andorran happens if that the unction does not occur or the sexagesimalness happens or both is incorrect. sent17: the disinfestation does not occur if that the unction does not occur and the Andorranness does not occur is false. sent18: if the sexagesimalness does not occur then that the exaggeration does not occur and the blandishment occurs is incorrect.
sent15 -> int1: the effleurage does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exaggeration occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that not the effleurage but the exaggeration happens is true.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the blandishment does not occur.; sent9 & sent2 -> int4: the reordering does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the blandishment and the sexagesimalness happens.; int5 -> int6: the blandishment happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the exaggeration does not occur is not wrong.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the unction does not occur and the Andorran does not occur is wrong.; int9 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the non-acanthoticness and the nonsphericalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the disinfestation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that not the exaggeration but the blandishment happens does not hold the acanthoticness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the misgovernment does not occur and the risking does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the serousness does not occur and the smocking range does not occur the risk does not occur. sent4: the decanting happens. sent5: if the exaggeration does not occur then that the unction does not occur and the Andorranness does not occur is not correct. sent6: the fact that that the junction does not occur and the vandalism happens is correct results in the non-armlessness. sent7: if the effleurage happens the sphericalness does not occur. sent8: that the blandishment does not occur and/or the exaggeration does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the Andorran happens is true. sent9: if the fact that the misgovernment does not occur and the risk does not occur is not true then that the reordering does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: that the dicarboxylicness occurs and the spilling wall occurs is correct. sent11: the fact that the blandishment does not occur if the effleurage does not occur but the exaggeration occurs hold. sent12: the paganizing does not occur if the fact that either the blandishment does not occur or the exaggeration does not occur or both does not hold. sent13: that that the lupineness and the non-acanthoticness occurs is false is not false if the dilapidating meanie does not occur. sent14: the blandishment and the sexagesimalness occurs if that the reordering does not occur is not wrong. sent15: the effleurage does not occur and the paganizing does not occur. sent16: the Andorran happens if that the unction does not occur or the sexagesimalness happens or both is incorrect. sent17: the disinfestation does not occur if that the unction does not occur and the Andorranness does not occur is false. sent18: if the sexagesimalness does not occur then that the exaggeration does not occur and the blandishment occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the effleurage does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exaggeration occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that not the effleurage but the exaggeration happens is true.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the blandishment does not occur.; sent9 & sent2 -> int4: the reordering does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the blandishment and the sexagesimalness happens.; int5 -> int6: the blandishment happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the exaggeration does not occur is not wrong.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the unction does not occur and the Andorran does not occur is wrong.; int9 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__