that the non-Levantineness and the non-electronicsness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the hardship occurs and the bluff does not occur if the salving hyoid does not occur. sent2: the clocking lumpenproletariat does not occur if the hardship but not the bluffing happens. sent3: the non-Levantineness and the non-electronicsness happens if the clocking lumpenproletariat does not occur. sent4: if the pairing occurs and the salving Abidjan happens then the crucialness does not occur. sent5: the salving hyoid does not occur.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the hardship but not the bluffing occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the clocking lumpenproletariat does not occur.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the non-Levantineness and the non-electronicsness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the hardship occurs and the bluff does not occur if the salving hyoid does not occur. sent2: the clocking lumpenproletariat does not occur if the hardship but not the bluffing happens. sent3: the non-Levantineness and the non-electronicsness happens if the clocking lumpenproletariat does not occur. sent4: if the pairing occurs and the salving Abidjan happens then the crucialness does not occur. sent5: the salving hyoid does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the hardship but not the bluffing occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the clocking lumpenproletariat does not occur.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__