the Pitman is not a literate and is a myelencephalon.
sent1: the imposter is a conciseness but not a Plutarch. sent2: the adz is not stomatous if the imposter is a Oliver but it is not a kind of a mahuang. sent3: if the imposter is a literate that it is a kind of non-insurrectional thing that is stomatous is incorrect. sent4: the imposter is insurrectional. sent5: the Pitman is a literate if there exists something such that it is not a Oliver. sent6: if the imposter is not non-insurrectional then it is a kind of a Oliver and it is not a kind of a mahuang. sent7: the Pitman is a myelencephalon and it is a Plutarch if there is something such that it is not a kind of a conciseness. sent8: something is not a literate if that it is a kind of stomatous thing that does accept battledore is wrong. sent9: the corvette is not a conciseness. sent10: the fact that the Pitman is stomatous and accepts battledore is not right if the fact that the adz is not stomatous is correct. sent11: that the corvette is not a conciseness is not incorrect if it does not accept battledore. sent12: the corvette is a Oliver. sent13: if something is not stomatous then it is insurrectional. sent14: the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a literate but it is a myelencephalon is false if it is insurrectional is true.
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the imposter is a kind of a Oliver but it is not a mahuang is not false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the adz is not stomatous.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the Pitman is stomatous and it does accept battledore is false is correct.; sent8 -> int4: the Pitman is not a literate if the fact that it is stomatous and accepts battledore is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Pitman is illiterate.; sent9 -> int6: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a conciseness is correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Pitman is a myelencephalon and a Plutarch.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the Pitman is a myelencephalon is not incorrect.; int5 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Pitman is not a kind of a literate but it is a myelencephalon is incorrect.
sent14 -> int9: that the Pitman is not a kind of a literate but it is a myelencephalon is not correct if it is insurrectional.; sent13 -> int10: if the Pitman is not stomatous it is insurrectional.; sent1 -> int11: the imposter is not a kind of a Plutarch.; int11 -> int12: either the imposter does accept battledore or it is not a Plutarch or both.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that either it accepts battledore or it is not a Plutarch or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the Pitman is not a literate and is a myelencephalon. ; $context$ = sent1: the imposter is a conciseness but not a Plutarch. sent2: the adz is not stomatous if the imposter is a Oliver but it is not a kind of a mahuang. sent3: if the imposter is a literate that it is a kind of non-insurrectional thing that is stomatous is incorrect. sent4: the imposter is insurrectional. sent5: the Pitman is a literate if there exists something such that it is not a Oliver. sent6: if the imposter is not non-insurrectional then it is a kind of a Oliver and it is not a kind of a mahuang. sent7: the Pitman is a myelencephalon and it is a Plutarch if there is something such that it is not a kind of a conciseness. sent8: something is not a literate if that it is a kind of stomatous thing that does accept battledore is wrong. sent9: the corvette is not a conciseness. sent10: the fact that the Pitman is stomatous and accepts battledore is not right if the fact that the adz is not stomatous is correct. sent11: that the corvette is not a conciseness is not incorrect if it does not accept battledore. sent12: the corvette is a Oliver. sent13: if something is not stomatous then it is insurrectional. sent14: the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a literate but it is a myelencephalon is false if it is insurrectional is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the imposter is a kind of a Oliver but it is not a mahuang is not false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the adz is not stomatous.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the Pitman is stomatous and it does accept battledore is false is correct.; sent8 -> int4: the Pitman is not a literate if the fact that it is stomatous and accepts battledore is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Pitman is illiterate.; sent9 -> int6: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a conciseness is correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Pitman is a myelencephalon and a Plutarch.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the Pitman is a myelencephalon is not incorrect.; int5 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__