the sulfate does not beggar saddlebag.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of Austrian thing that is not dominical is not correct. sent2: if that the massager is a greengrocery or a punishment or both is not true then the fact that it is a kind of a Lycosidae is right. sent3: something that does repress Galton and is dominical is not a kind of a Lycosidae. sent4: the fact that something does not repress Galton and beggars saddlebag is not correct if it is anemic. sent5: something is innocent if that either it is not non-augitic or it does not piece quiddity or both is wrong. sent6: if something that is a governess does not hog heart-to-heart then it is a kind of an ambush. sent7: the sulfate represses Galton if there is something such that it is not anemic. sent8: something does beggar saddlebag if it is an innocent that is not a kind of a Lycosidae. sent9: the sulfate pieces quiddity. sent10: if the sulfate is nonlexical and it does beggar saddlebag it does not hog velveteen. sent11: the sulfate is dominical if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not non-Austrian and dominical is not right. sent12: there are non-anemic things. sent13: that the sulfate is augitic and/or it does not piece quiddity is not right. sent14: if the fact that either something is augitic or it pieces quiddity or both is wrong it is an innocent. sent15: the fact that either the sulfate is a backstay or it is not anemic or both does not hold.
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the sulfate represses Galton is true.; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: that the sulfate is dominical is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sulfate represses Galton and is dominical.; sent3 -> int4: the sulfate is not a Lycosidae if it does repress Galton and it is not non-dominical.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sulfate is not a Lycosidae.; sent5 -> int6: if that the fact that the sulfate is augitic and/or it does not piece quiddity hold is wrong it is an innocent.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the sulfate is an innocent.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the sulfate is an innocent but it is not a Lycosidae.; sent8 -> int9: if the sulfate is an innocent but it is not a Lycosidae then it does beggar saddlebag.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the sulfate does not beggar saddlebag.
sent4 -> int10: if the bustle is anemic the fact that it does not repress Galton and it beggars saddlebag does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the sulfate does not beggar saddlebag. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of Austrian thing that is not dominical is not correct. sent2: if that the massager is a greengrocery or a punishment or both is not true then the fact that it is a kind of a Lycosidae is right. sent3: something that does repress Galton and is dominical is not a kind of a Lycosidae. sent4: the fact that something does not repress Galton and beggars saddlebag is not correct if it is anemic. sent5: something is innocent if that either it is not non-augitic or it does not piece quiddity or both is wrong. sent6: if something that is a governess does not hog heart-to-heart then it is a kind of an ambush. sent7: the sulfate represses Galton if there is something such that it is not anemic. sent8: something does beggar saddlebag if it is an innocent that is not a kind of a Lycosidae. sent9: the sulfate pieces quiddity. sent10: if the sulfate is nonlexical and it does beggar saddlebag it does not hog velveteen. sent11: the sulfate is dominical if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not non-Austrian and dominical is not right. sent12: there are non-anemic things. sent13: that the sulfate is augitic and/or it does not piece quiddity is not right. sent14: if the fact that either something is augitic or it pieces quiddity or both is wrong it is an innocent. sent15: the fact that either the sulfate is a backstay or it is not anemic or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the sulfate represses Galton is true.; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: that the sulfate is dominical is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sulfate represses Galton and is dominical.; sent3 -> int4: the sulfate is not a Lycosidae if it does repress Galton and it is not non-dominical.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sulfate is not a Lycosidae.; sent5 -> int6: if that the fact that the sulfate is augitic and/or it does not piece quiddity hold is wrong it is an innocent.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the sulfate is an innocent.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the sulfate is an innocent but it is not a Lycosidae.; sent8 -> int9: if the sulfate is an innocent but it is not a Lycosidae then it does beggar saddlebag.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__