if the glucosamine does not tweet perigon then the fact that it is not a kind of a supported and is not nonresidential is false.
sent1: that something is both not a supported and not nonresidential is not correct if it does not tweet perigon. sent2: the fact that the glucosamine supports but it is not nonresidential does not hold if the fact that it does not tweet perigon is correct. sent3: that the glucosamine does not support and it is not nonresidential does not hold if the fact that it tweets perigon is right. sent4: if the glucosamine does not tweet perigon it is not a supported and not nonresidential. sent5: if something does not tweet perigon that it is not a supported but nonresidential does not hold. sent6: the fact that something is not a props and it does not tweet carrot is not right if it is not a helium.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
if the keep is not a helium that it is not a props and does not tweet carrot does not hold.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the glucosamine does not tweet perigon then the fact that it is not a kind of a supported and is not nonresidential is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is both not a supported and not nonresidential is not correct if it does not tweet perigon. sent2: the fact that the glucosamine supports but it is not nonresidential does not hold if the fact that it does not tweet perigon is correct. sent3: that the glucosamine does not support and it is not nonresidential does not hold if the fact that it tweets perigon is right. sent4: if the glucosamine does not tweet perigon it is not a supported and not nonresidential. sent5: if something does not tweet perigon that it is not a supported but nonresidential does not hold. sent6: the fact that something is not a props and it does not tweet carrot is not right if it is not a helium. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__