the ACTH is a lacking.
sent1: the ACTH does not efface Verbenaceae if the fact that it does not seat and it does not efface camber is not true. sent2: that the ACTH does not efface camber and is not a kind of a seat does not hold if the heathen does not efface Verbenaceae. sent3: if the camber is not a Cork and it is not aphanitic the submarine does not tin unsightliness. sent4: if the ACTH is a kind of a seat then it effaces flicker. sent5: the fact that the theosophist is secure thing that is not a fish-fly is incorrect. sent6: that something does not fluctuate and it is not a Iago is not right if it does not tin unsightliness. sent7: if the ACTH effaces flicker then that the pizzeria is not a kind of a fish-fly but it is secure is not correct. sent8: if the ACTH is a kind of an onslaught it is a lacking. sent9: if the fact that the pizzeria is not a fish-fly and secures does not hold the theosophist does not secures. sent10: the pizzeria does not efface flicker if there is something such that that that it is not secure and not a fish-fly is not false is not right. sent11: if that something does not efface camber and is not a seat is not correct then it does seat. sent12: the fact that the ACTH does not seat and does not efface camber is not right if the pizzeria does not efface flicker. sent13: the ACTH is an onslaught if it does not efface Verbenaceae. sent14: the pizzeria is an onslaught. sent15: the camber does tin unsightliness. sent16: the dentist is an onslaught. sent17: the fact that the camber is not aphanitic is not false. sent18: the dentist is a lacking and does efface tableware. sent19: The unsightliness does tin camber. sent20: that the theosophist is not secure and is not a fish-fly is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cork is not wrong.
sent15 & sent17 -> int1: the camber does tin unsightliness but it is not aphanitic.;
the fact that the submarine does not fluctuate and is not a kind of a Iago is not true.
sent6 -> int2: the fact that the submarine does not fluctuate and it is not a kind of a Iago is not correct if it does not tin unsightliness.; sent11 -> int3: if the fact that the ACTH does not efface camber and is not a seat is not true then it seat.; sent18 -> int4: the dentist is a lacking.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the dentist is a lacking and it is an onslaught.; int5 -> int6: something is a lacking that is an onslaught.;
$hypothesis$ = the ACTH is a lacking. ; $context$ = sent1: the ACTH does not efface Verbenaceae if the fact that it does not seat and it does not efface camber is not true. sent2: that the ACTH does not efface camber and is not a kind of a seat does not hold if the heathen does not efface Verbenaceae. sent3: if the camber is not a Cork and it is not aphanitic the submarine does not tin unsightliness. sent4: if the ACTH is a kind of a seat then it effaces flicker. sent5: the fact that the theosophist is secure thing that is not a fish-fly is incorrect. sent6: that something does not fluctuate and it is not a Iago is not right if it does not tin unsightliness. sent7: if the ACTH effaces flicker then that the pizzeria is not a kind of a fish-fly but it is secure is not correct. sent8: if the ACTH is a kind of an onslaught it is a lacking. sent9: if the fact that the pizzeria is not a fish-fly and secures does not hold the theosophist does not secures. sent10: the pizzeria does not efface flicker if there is something such that that that it is not secure and not a fish-fly is not false is not right. sent11: if that something does not efface camber and is not a seat is not correct then it does seat. sent12: the fact that the ACTH does not seat and does not efface camber is not right if the pizzeria does not efface flicker. sent13: the ACTH is an onslaught if it does not efface Verbenaceae. sent14: the pizzeria is an onslaught. sent15: the camber does tin unsightliness. sent16: the dentist is an onslaught. sent17: the fact that the camber is not aphanitic is not false. sent18: the dentist is a lacking and does efface tableware. sent19: The unsightliness does tin camber. sent20: that the theosophist is not secure and is not a fish-fly is not right if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cork is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent17 -> int1: the camber does tin unsightliness but it is not aphanitic.; __UNKNOWN__