there exists something such that if it is wintry then that it is not a catkin and it does not exclaim does not hold.
sent1: the fact that something does not bethink VIP and it is not estrous is not true if it edges nosh-up. sent2: there is something such that if it is wintry that it is not a catkin and it does exclaim is not correct. sent3: if the rutile is wintry then the fact that it is a catkin and it does not exclaim is false. sent4: the rutile is not a kind of a catkin and does not exclaim if it is wintry. sent5: if the rutile is wintry then the fact that it is not a catkin and it exclaims does not hold. sent6: that that something is not a catkin and does not exclaim is false if it is wintry is correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it is wintry it is not a catkin and does not exclaim. sent8: the fact that something is a catkin but it does not exclaim is not right if that it is wintry is not incorrect. sent9: if something is wintry it is not a catkin and it does not exclaim. sent10: there is something such that if it is wintry then the fact that it is a kind of a catkin and it does not exclaim is false. sent11: if something is wintry the fact that it is not a catkin and exclaims is not right. sent12: the fact that something is not a snap and is not stannic does not hold if it blackmails Styron.
sent6 -> int1: if the rutile is wintry the fact that it is not a kind of a catkin and does not exclaim does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is wintry then that it is not a catkin and it does not exclaim does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not bethink VIP and it is not estrous is not true if it edges nosh-up. sent2: there is something such that if it is wintry that it is not a catkin and it does exclaim is not correct. sent3: if the rutile is wintry then the fact that it is a catkin and it does not exclaim is false. sent4: the rutile is not a kind of a catkin and does not exclaim if it is wintry. sent5: if the rutile is wintry then the fact that it is not a catkin and it exclaims does not hold. sent6: that that something is not a catkin and does not exclaim is false if it is wintry is correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it is wintry it is not a catkin and does not exclaim. sent8: the fact that something is a catkin but it does not exclaim is not right if that it is wintry is not incorrect. sent9: if something is wintry it is not a catkin and it does not exclaim. sent10: there is something such that if it is wintry then the fact that it is a kind of a catkin and it does not exclaim is false. sent11: if something is wintry the fact that it is not a catkin and exclaims is not right. sent12: the fact that something is not a snap and is not stannic does not hold if it blackmails Styron. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the rutile is wintry the fact that it is not a kind of a catkin and does not exclaim does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__