the squaw is scalene.
sent1: the buckeye is not a peasecod and not a liquidambar. sent2: if something is not spermicidal the fact that it is not a grove and it is not entozoic is false. sent3: the fact that if the serum does not sermonize Quoratean then the serum is not spermicidal but it is a peasecod is correct. sent4: that the serum is not fatty and it is not actinomycetal is not correct if it is harsh. sent5: the fact that the proof is scalene thing that is a kind of a peasecod is not correct. sent6: the proof does not cloister shuttered if the fact that it sermonizes Jinghpo and cloisters relaxation does not hold. sent7: the squaw is not spermicidal. sent8: the serum is not spermicidal but it is a Jeffersonian if it is not a kind of a peasecod. sent9: the proof is not a kind of a grove if the serum is a Fossa but it is not a kind of a Belem. sent10: if that the serum is not fatty and it is not actinomycetal is not right then it does not sermonize Quoratean. sent11: the serum is not a peasecod if the proof does sermonize Quoratean. sent12: the proof is not entozoic if that it is entozoic and it is not Jeffersonian is incorrect. sent13: that the proof is entozoic but it is not a kind of a Jeffersonian is not right. sent14: the proof is not spermicidal if that it sermonizes Quoratean and is a peasecod is not true. sent15: the squaw is not a grove if that it is a kind of a grove and is not scalene does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the proof is not a peasecod is not false then it is not spermicidal. sent17: that the dallier is a grove and it is a shoulder is not correct. sent18: if the fact that the serum is a Fossa but it is not a Belem does not hold then the squaw is not scalene. sent19: the serum is harsh if it is a kind of a Lawrence and it is not econometric. sent20: the fact that the proof does sermonize Quoratean and it is a peasecod does not hold. sent21: if the serum is not a grove then the squaw is scalene and it is entozoic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the serum is a Fossa and is not a Belem.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the proof is not a kind of a grove.; sent12 & sent13 -> int2: the proof is not entozoic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the proof is not a grove and not entozoic hold.; sent2 -> int4: if the proof is not spermicidal then the fact that it is not a grove and not entozoic is not true.; sent14 & sent20 -> int5: the proof is not spermicidal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the proof is not a grove and is not entozoic does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the serum is a kind of a Fossa but it is not a kind of a Belem is not correct.; int8 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the squaw is scalene.
$hypothesis$ = the squaw is scalene. ; $context$ = sent1: the buckeye is not a peasecod and not a liquidambar. sent2: if something is not spermicidal the fact that it is not a grove and it is not entozoic is false. sent3: the fact that if the serum does not sermonize Quoratean then the serum is not spermicidal but it is a peasecod is correct. sent4: that the serum is not fatty and it is not actinomycetal is not correct if it is harsh. sent5: the fact that the proof is scalene thing that is a kind of a peasecod is not correct. sent6: the proof does not cloister shuttered if the fact that it sermonizes Jinghpo and cloisters relaxation does not hold. sent7: the squaw is not spermicidal. sent8: the serum is not spermicidal but it is a Jeffersonian if it is not a kind of a peasecod. sent9: the proof is not a kind of a grove if the serum is a Fossa but it is not a kind of a Belem. sent10: if that the serum is not fatty and it is not actinomycetal is not right then it does not sermonize Quoratean. sent11: the serum is not a peasecod if the proof does sermonize Quoratean. sent12: the proof is not entozoic if that it is entozoic and it is not Jeffersonian is incorrect. sent13: that the proof is entozoic but it is not a kind of a Jeffersonian is not right. sent14: the proof is not spermicidal if that it sermonizes Quoratean and is a peasecod is not true. sent15: the squaw is not a grove if that it is a kind of a grove and is not scalene does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the proof is not a peasecod is not false then it is not spermicidal. sent17: that the dallier is a grove and it is a shoulder is not correct. sent18: if the fact that the serum is a Fossa but it is not a Belem does not hold then the squaw is not scalene. sent19: the serum is harsh if it is a kind of a Lawrence and it is not econometric. sent20: the fact that the proof does sermonize Quoratean and it is a peasecod does not hold. sent21: if the serum is not a grove then the squaw is scalene and it is entozoic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the serum is a Fossa and is not a Belem.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the proof is not a kind of a grove.; sent12 & sent13 -> int2: the proof is not entozoic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the proof is not a grove and not entozoic hold.; sent2 -> int4: if the proof is not spermicidal then the fact that it is not a grove and not entozoic is not true.; sent14 & sent20 -> int5: the proof is not spermicidal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the proof is not a grove and is not entozoic does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the serum is a kind of a Fossa but it is not a kind of a Belem is not correct.; int8 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__