the joker is discourteous.
sent1: the finisher is not icosahedral. sent2: if the joker does not determine Arlington and is accommodational then it is not courteous. sent3: the joker does not purse ptyalin. sent4: that the fact that the Mackem is not Mesoamerican but capsular is not right is not incorrect. sent5: the elastomer is courteous. sent6: the finisher is not a kind of a fraud. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not dogmatize Marti then that the dideoxycytosine is a kind of a fraud that does not determine eunuch does not hold. sent8: if the joker does not diverge then that it is not a fraud is not false. sent9: if the Mackem determines eunuch that it is not courteous and/or it does not dogmatize Marti is wrong. sent10: the Mackem determines eunuch if that it is not Mesoamerican and is capsular is false. sent11: the retainer does not determine Arlington if there exists something such that it is not a transaminase. sent12: the finisher is a second. sent13: the retainer is courteous if that the Mackem is not courteous or it does not dogmatize Marti or both is not true. sent14: the Snow does not dogmatize Marti. sent15: the fact that the finisher does not dogmatize suggestion is not false if the fact that the joker determines Arlington and is accommodational does not hold. sent16: the joker is courteous if the finisher is not accommodational and is not a transaminase. sent17: The Arlington determines finisher. sent18: the finisher determines Arlington. sent19: something is not accommodational if it does not second. sent20: if the finisher does not determine nutrition but it is second it does not determine Arlington. sent21: the finisher does not determine nutrition if it is not courteous. sent22: the Mackem is not a transaminase if there is something such that the fact that it is a fraud and it does not determine eunuch does not hold. sent23: if the finisher is not a fraud then it is not a transaminase. sent24: if the finisher is not a second it is not accommodational. sent25: if the fact that something does not determine nutrition and does second is not right then it is not accommodational. sent26: if the retainer is not a transaminase then that the joker determines Arlington and is accommodational is incorrect. sent27: if the litchi is not a recommendation it is not a second.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the finisher does not determine nutrition but it is a second.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the finisher does not determine Arlington is not wrong.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the finisher does not determine nutrition and does second is wrong.; sent25 -> int4: if the fact that the finisher does not determine nutrition but it seconds is incorrect it is not accommodational.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the finisher is not accommodational.; sent23 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the finisher is not a kind of a transaminase hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the finisher is not accommodational and it is not a transaminase.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the joker is not courteous.
sent14 -> int8: there is something such that it does not dogmatize Marti.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: that the dideoxycytosine is a fraud but it does not determine eunuch is not right.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is a fraud and does not determine eunuch is not correct.; int10 & sent22 -> int11: the Mackem is not a kind of a transaminase.; int11 -> int12: the fact that there exists something such that it is not a transaminase is correct.; int12 & sent11 -> int13: the retainer does not determine Arlington.; int13 -> int14: the fact that something does not determine Arlington hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the joker is discourteous. ; $context$ = sent1: the finisher is not icosahedral. sent2: if the joker does not determine Arlington and is accommodational then it is not courteous. sent3: the joker does not purse ptyalin. sent4: that the fact that the Mackem is not Mesoamerican but capsular is not right is not incorrect. sent5: the elastomer is courteous. sent6: the finisher is not a kind of a fraud. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not dogmatize Marti then that the dideoxycytosine is a kind of a fraud that does not determine eunuch does not hold. sent8: if the joker does not diverge then that it is not a fraud is not false. sent9: if the Mackem determines eunuch that it is not courteous and/or it does not dogmatize Marti is wrong. sent10: the Mackem determines eunuch if that it is not Mesoamerican and is capsular is false. sent11: the retainer does not determine Arlington if there exists something such that it is not a transaminase. sent12: the finisher is a second. sent13: the retainer is courteous if that the Mackem is not courteous or it does not dogmatize Marti or both is not true. sent14: the Snow does not dogmatize Marti. sent15: the fact that the finisher does not dogmatize suggestion is not false if the fact that the joker determines Arlington and is accommodational does not hold. sent16: the joker is courteous if the finisher is not accommodational and is not a transaminase. sent17: The Arlington determines finisher. sent18: the finisher determines Arlington. sent19: something is not accommodational if it does not second. sent20: if the finisher does not determine nutrition but it is second it does not determine Arlington. sent21: the finisher does not determine nutrition if it is not courteous. sent22: the Mackem is not a transaminase if there is something such that the fact that it is a fraud and it does not determine eunuch does not hold. sent23: if the finisher is not a fraud then it is not a transaminase. sent24: if the finisher is not a second it is not accommodational. sent25: if the fact that something does not determine nutrition and does second is not right then it is not accommodational. sent26: if the retainer is not a transaminase then that the joker determines Arlington and is accommodational is incorrect. sent27: if the litchi is not a recommendation it is not a second. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the finisher does not determine nutrition but it is a second.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the finisher does not determine Arlington is not wrong.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the finisher does not determine nutrition and does second is wrong.; sent25 -> int4: if the fact that the finisher does not determine nutrition but it seconds is incorrect it is not accommodational.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the finisher is not accommodational.; sent23 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the finisher is not a kind of a transaminase hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the finisher is not accommodational and it is not a transaminase.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__