the fact that the stucco is an acoustics is true.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is a maser that is not a kind of a Lobito does not hold the ironwood shatters approbation. sent2: the radicchio is not a fracture. sent3: that the fact that the trotter is a maser but it is not a kind of a Lobito is not incorrect is false. sent4: if something does not shatter laxness then it does not shatter approbation or is not a amnesic or both. sent5: if the ironwood is a Lobito then the trotter does shatter approbation. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is acoustics and it is not a kind of a Lobito does not hold the fact that the trotter does shatter approbation is correct. sent7: that the stucco is an acoustics is right if that the ironwood shatters approbation hold. sent8: something does not shatter laxness if the fact that it is anamorphic and pyrectic does not hold. sent9: the ironwood is a wistfulness if there is something such that the fact that it does not twig and it does not shatter cardiospasm does not hold. sent10: if something does not shatter approbation and/or it is not a amnesic it is not an acoustics. sent11: the ironwood is a maser. sent12: that the fact that the stucco is both a Lobito and acoustics is not correct is true. sent13: the fact that the radicchio does not twig and it does not shatter cardiospasm is wrong if it is not a fracture.
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a maser and it is not a Lobito is false.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ironwood shatters approbation.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the stucco is not an acoustics.
sent10 -> int3: the stucco is not an acoustics if it does not shatter approbation and/or is not a amnesic.; sent4 -> int4: if the fact that the stucco does not shatter laxness hold it does not shatter approbation or it is not amnesic or both.; sent8 -> int5: that the stucco does not shatter laxness hold if that it is anamorphic and it is pyrectic does not hold.; sent13 & sent2 -> int6: that the radicchio does not twig and does not shatter cardiospasm is false.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not twig and does not shatter cardiospasm is wrong.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the ironwood is a wistfulness.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a wistfulness.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stucco is an acoustics is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is a maser that is not a kind of a Lobito does not hold the ironwood shatters approbation. sent2: the radicchio is not a fracture. sent3: that the fact that the trotter is a maser but it is not a kind of a Lobito is not incorrect is false. sent4: if something does not shatter laxness then it does not shatter approbation or is not a amnesic or both. sent5: if the ironwood is a Lobito then the trotter does shatter approbation. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is acoustics and it is not a kind of a Lobito does not hold the fact that the trotter does shatter approbation is correct. sent7: that the stucco is an acoustics is right if that the ironwood shatters approbation hold. sent8: something does not shatter laxness if the fact that it is anamorphic and pyrectic does not hold. sent9: the ironwood is a wistfulness if there is something such that the fact that it does not twig and it does not shatter cardiospasm does not hold. sent10: if something does not shatter approbation and/or it is not a amnesic it is not an acoustics. sent11: the ironwood is a maser. sent12: that the fact that the stucco is both a Lobito and acoustics is not correct is true. sent13: the fact that the radicchio does not twig and it does not shatter cardiospasm is wrong if it is not a fracture. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a maser and it is not a Lobito is false.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ironwood shatters approbation.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__