there is something such that if it is a rathole it is a kind of a differential that is not a kind of an animation.
sent1: there is something such that if it does skittle it is glad. sent2: if the organza is a kind of a rathole then it is a kind of a differential and it is not an animation. sent3: the organza does bow and it does crook creationism if it is an animation. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is Ghanaian hold then it is a maxi and it does not recharge. sent5: that there is something such that if it is a kind of a rathole then the fact that it is not an animation is correct is not wrong. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if it does crook creationism it crooks rudderpost is true. sent7: something is eparchial but it is not a kind of a Sheetrock if that it is a kind of a Dipylon hold. sent8: if the organza is associative it is a differential that does not cancel individual. sent9: the organza is a kind of a differential if that it is a kind of a rathole hold. sent10: that there is something such that if the fact that it is not rimmed is right then it is a banter and it is a kind of an organic is correct. sent11: that if the fact that the organza is a kind of the seaward is not false then the organza is a kind of an animation and is a cadet is not incorrect. sent12: there is something such that if it crooks entitlement the fact that it is both not non-algoid and not non-cross-modal hold.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
the jampan is eparchial and is not a kind of a Sheetrock if it is a Dipylon.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a rathole it is a kind of a differential that is not a kind of an animation. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does skittle it is glad. sent2: if the organza is a kind of a rathole then it is a kind of a differential and it is not an animation. sent3: the organza does bow and it does crook creationism if it is an animation. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is Ghanaian hold then it is a maxi and it does not recharge. sent5: that there is something such that if it is a kind of a rathole then the fact that it is not an animation is correct is not wrong. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if it does crook creationism it crooks rudderpost is true. sent7: something is eparchial but it is not a kind of a Sheetrock if that it is a kind of a Dipylon hold. sent8: if the organza is associative it is a differential that does not cancel individual. sent9: the organza is a kind of a differential if that it is a kind of a rathole hold. sent10: that there is something such that if the fact that it is not rimmed is right then it is a banter and it is a kind of an organic is correct. sent11: that if the fact that the organza is a kind of the seaward is not false then the organza is a kind of an animation and is a cadet is not incorrect. sent12: there is something such that if it crooks entitlement the fact that it is both not non-algoid and not non-cross-modal hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__