that both the karyokineticness and the subsidization occurs does not hold.
sent1: the misgiving UHF occurs if the pecticness does not occur. sent2: the Abkhaz happens and the outstaying happens. sent3: if the resistiveness does not occur then that both the karyokineticness and the subsidization occurs is incorrect. sent4: the spillover yields the skunk. sent5: that the retrial does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: both the storminess and the run-up happens. sent7: if the Abkhaz and the misgiving UHF happens the patrol does not occur. sent8: the outstaying happens. sent9: that the patrolling does not occur prevents that the resistiveness happens. sent10: if the briefing occurs then the uptownness occurs. sent11: the fact that the skunk does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pecticness occurs.; sent2 -> int1: the Abkhaz happens.;
$hypothesis$ = that both the karyokineticness and the subsidization occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the misgiving UHF occurs if the pecticness does not occur. sent2: the Abkhaz happens and the outstaying happens. sent3: if the resistiveness does not occur then that both the karyokineticness and the subsidization occurs is incorrect. sent4: the spillover yields the skunk. sent5: that the retrial does not occur is not incorrect. sent6: both the storminess and the run-up happens. sent7: if the Abkhaz and the misgiving UHF happens the patrol does not occur. sent8: the outstaying happens. sent9: that the patrolling does not occur prevents that the resistiveness happens. sent10: if the briefing occurs then the uptownness occurs. sent11: the fact that the skunk does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pecticness occurs.; sent2 -> int1: the Abkhaz happens.; __UNKNOWN__