the fact that the characin is not a protectionism and it is not a creativity does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that something is not a Mam but a Anthony is right then it gesticulates chignon. sent2: if something that is not a creativity is not a Indra it is not uterine. sent3: the fact that the fact that the mythologist gesticulates chignon and is not a Indra is not wrong does not hold if it is not a Herbart. sent4: the characin is a kind of a Herbart. sent5: the chill does not unclog and does not beckon accelerando. sent6: the fact that the mythologist is a Anthony and not a creativity is wrong if it is not a protectionism. sent7: the fact that the characin is a creativity and not uterine is false. sent8: the novel is inaccurate and profitable. sent9: the novel is a kind of a creativity if it is a Mam. sent10: if the novel is not honorable that it does deny slap and it is not bibliographic is incorrect. sent11: if the novel is a Mam the fact that it is a kind of a Anthony hold. sent12: the mythologist is not a Herbart. sent13: if the novel is not uterine but it is a Mam that the characin is not a Mam is not false. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Mam then the fact that it is not a protectionism and not a creativity is not correct. sent15: if the mythologist is not a kind of a creativity the characin is not a kind of a protectionism and it is not a creativity. sent16: if the novel is a Anthony the mythologist is uterine. sent17: the Walker is not a creativity and it is not a Indra if it is not a protectionism. sent18: something is not a Mam but it is a Anthony if it is not uterine. sent19: if that something does gesticulate chignon and is not a kind of a Indra is not correct then it is a Indra. sent20: something is not a creativity if it is uterine and it is a Indra. sent21: the mythologist is a countertenor and a galactose. sent22: the novel is a Mam.
sent11 & sent22 -> int1: the novel is a Anthony.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the mythologist is uterine.; sent19 -> int3: if that the mythologist gesticulates chignon and is not a Indra is incorrect then it is a Indra.; sent3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the mythologist gesticulates chignon and is not a Indra is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mythologist is a Indra.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the mythologist is uterine and it is a kind of a Indra.; sent20 -> int7: if the mythologist is uterine and it is a Indra then it is not a creativity.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the mythologist is not a creativity is true.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the characin is not a protectionism and it is not a creativity does not hold.
sent14 -> int9: the fact that the characin is not a protectionism and it is not a creativity is wrong if it is not a Mam.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the characin is not a protectionism and it is not a creativity does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not a Mam but a Anthony is right then it gesticulates chignon. sent2: if something that is not a creativity is not a Indra it is not uterine. sent3: the fact that the fact that the mythologist gesticulates chignon and is not a Indra is not wrong does not hold if it is not a Herbart. sent4: the characin is a kind of a Herbart. sent5: the chill does not unclog and does not beckon accelerando. sent6: the fact that the mythologist is a Anthony and not a creativity is wrong if it is not a protectionism. sent7: the fact that the characin is a creativity and not uterine is false. sent8: the novel is inaccurate and profitable. sent9: the novel is a kind of a creativity if it is a Mam. sent10: if the novel is not honorable that it does deny slap and it is not bibliographic is incorrect. sent11: if the novel is a Mam the fact that it is a kind of a Anthony hold. sent12: the mythologist is not a Herbart. sent13: if the novel is not uterine but it is a Mam that the characin is not a Mam is not false. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Mam then the fact that it is not a protectionism and not a creativity is not correct. sent15: if the mythologist is not a kind of a creativity the characin is not a kind of a protectionism and it is not a creativity. sent16: if the novel is a Anthony the mythologist is uterine. sent17: the Walker is not a creativity and it is not a Indra if it is not a protectionism. sent18: something is not a Mam but it is a Anthony if it is not uterine. sent19: if that something does gesticulate chignon and is not a kind of a Indra is not correct then it is a Indra. sent20: something is not a creativity if it is uterine and it is a Indra. sent21: the mythologist is a countertenor and a galactose. sent22: the novel is a Mam. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent22 -> int1: the novel is a Anthony.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the mythologist is uterine.; sent19 -> int3: if that the mythologist gesticulates chignon and is not a Indra is incorrect then it is a Indra.; sent3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the mythologist gesticulates chignon and is not a Indra is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mythologist is a Indra.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the mythologist is uterine and it is a kind of a Indra.; sent20 -> int7: if the mythologist is uterine and it is a Indra then it is not a creativity.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the mythologist is not a creativity is true.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__