the bypassing undervaluation occurs and the scopalness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the illuminating occurs but the potshot does not occur is not right if the bypassing undervaluation does not occur. sent2: the non-responsibleness triggers the non-sickness. sent3: the Brazilianness does not occur if the fact that the illuminating happens and the potshot does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the potshot happens the illuminating happens. sent5: the bypassing Medicare occurs. sent6: if the fact that the pyrotechnicsness does not occur and the twining Palgrave does not occur is false then the positionableness does not occur. sent7: if the sickness does not occur then that the pyrotechnicsness does not occur and the twining Palgrave does not occur does not hold. sent8: the bypassing Pizarro does not occur. sent9: that the potshot does not occur triggers the bypassing undervaluation. sent10: the non-bridgeableness prevents that the scopalness happens. sent11: that the bypassing euphorbium and the bridgeableness occurs is false if that the bypassing Pizarro does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: that the spawning occurs and the sledding happens prevents that the responsibleness occurs. sent13: if the roping happens then not the bypassing euphorbium but the bridgeableness occurs. sent14: the excusableness happens if the circumscription happens. sent15: that the bypassing Medicare does not occur results in that the twining abutment and the scopalness occurs. sent16: the scopalness does not occur if that both the bypassing euphorbium and the bridgeableness happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potshot occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the illuminating happens.; sent11 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the bypassing euphorbium occurs and the bridgeableness occurs is not right.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the scopalness does not occur.;
the fact that the bypassing undervaluation and the non-scopalness occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bypassing undervaluation occurs and the scopalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the illuminating occurs but the potshot does not occur is not right if the bypassing undervaluation does not occur. sent2: the non-responsibleness triggers the non-sickness. sent3: the Brazilianness does not occur if the fact that the illuminating happens and the potshot does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the potshot happens the illuminating happens. sent5: the bypassing Medicare occurs. sent6: if the fact that the pyrotechnicsness does not occur and the twining Palgrave does not occur is false then the positionableness does not occur. sent7: if the sickness does not occur then that the pyrotechnicsness does not occur and the twining Palgrave does not occur does not hold. sent8: the bypassing Pizarro does not occur. sent9: that the potshot does not occur triggers the bypassing undervaluation. sent10: the non-bridgeableness prevents that the scopalness happens. sent11: that the bypassing euphorbium and the bridgeableness occurs is false if that the bypassing Pizarro does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: that the spawning occurs and the sledding happens prevents that the responsibleness occurs. sent13: if the roping happens then not the bypassing euphorbium but the bridgeableness occurs. sent14: the excusableness happens if the circumscription happens. sent15: that the bypassing Medicare does not occur results in that the twining abutment and the scopalness occurs. sent16: the scopalness does not occur if that both the bypassing euphorbium and the bridgeableness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potshot occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the illuminating happens.; sent11 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the bypassing euphorbium occurs and the bridgeableness occurs is not right.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the scopalness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__