the farrier is both Caesarian and not a craft.
sent1: the couverture is a dazzle and it means Morrison. sent2: something gongs expensiveness if it does mean Morrison. sent3: if the couverture gongs expensiveness then it is genotypical. sent4: that the farrier is not a craft is not incorrect if there is something such that it is not cortical. sent5: if something is a dazzle that that it is Caesarian and it does not craft hold does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it is not cortical.
sent1 -> int1: the couverture does mean Morrison.; sent2 -> int2: the couverture gongs expensiveness if it does mean Morrison.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the couverture gongs expensiveness.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the couverture is genotypical.; sent6 & sent4 -> int5: the farrier is not a craft.;
that the farrier is Caesarian but it does not craft is false.
sent5 -> int6: that the farrier is Caesarian but it does not craft is false if it is a kind of a dazzle.;
$hypothesis$ = the farrier is both Caesarian and not a craft. ; $context$ = sent1: the couverture is a dazzle and it means Morrison. sent2: something gongs expensiveness if it does mean Morrison. sent3: if the couverture gongs expensiveness then it is genotypical. sent4: that the farrier is not a craft is not incorrect if there is something such that it is not cortical. sent5: if something is a dazzle that that it is Caesarian and it does not craft hold does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it is not cortical. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the couverture does mean Morrison.; sent2 -> int2: the couverture gongs expensiveness if it does mean Morrison.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the couverture gongs expensiveness.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the couverture is genotypical.; sent6 & sent4 -> int5: the farrier is not a craft.; __UNKNOWN__