the fact that the tarot does determine tarot hold.
sent1: something is a Echinochloa and it determines tarot if it is not a kind of a hyaloplasm. sent2: if something is a kind of a skimmer then the fact that it is not basaltic and it is a Echinochloa is incorrect. sent3: the ear is a steps and it is a currant. sent4: everything is non-consubstantial. sent5: the fact that something is a hyaloplasm and it determines tarot does not hold if it is not a kind of a Echinochloa. sent6: if the fact that the motoneuron is not a skimmer and/or it is a frizz does not hold then the sallow is a skimmer. sent7: if the tarot is not a hyaloplasm it is a kind of a Echinochloa. sent8: the motoneuron dogmatizes plesiosaur if it is a kind of a Syrian and it is not a kind of a steps. sent9: everything is not a hyaloplasm and not consubstantial. sent10: that the motoneuron is not a kind of a skimmer and/or it is a frizz does not hold if it does dogmatize plesiosaur. sent11: if that the sallow is a kind of non-basaltic a Echinochloa is incorrect the shingler is not a Echinochloa. sent12: that the motoneuron is both basaltic and not a frizz does not hold.
sent9 -> int1: the tarot is not a kind of a hyaloplasm and it is not consubstantial.; int1 -> int2: the tarot is not a kind of a hyaloplasm.; sent1 -> int3: if the tarot is not a hyaloplasm it is a kind of a Echinochloa that determines tarot.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the tarot is a Echinochloa and it does determine tarot.; int4 -> hypothesis;
that the Kleenex is not a hyaloplasm hold.
sent5 -> int5: that the shingler is a hyaloplasm that determines tarot is not right if it is not a Echinochloa.; sent2 -> int6: if the sallow is a skimmer that it is not basaltic and it is a kind of a Echinochloa does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tarot does determine tarot hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Echinochloa and it determines tarot if it is not a kind of a hyaloplasm. sent2: if something is a kind of a skimmer then the fact that it is not basaltic and it is a Echinochloa is incorrect. sent3: the ear is a steps and it is a currant. sent4: everything is non-consubstantial. sent5: the fact that something is a hyaloplasm and it determines tarot does not hold if it is not a kind of a Echinochloa. sent6: if the fact that the motoneuron is not a skimmer and/or it is a frizz does not hold then the sallow is a skimmer. sent7: if the tarot is not a hyaloplasm it is a kind of a Echinochloa. sent8: the motoneuron dogmatizes plesiosaur if it is a kind of a Syrian and it is not a kind of a steps. sent9: everything is not a hyaloplasm and not consubstantial. sent10: that the motoneuron is not a kind of a skimmer and/or it is a frizz does not hold if it does dogmatize plesiosaur. sent11: if that the sallow is a kind of non-basaltic a Echinochloa is incorrect the shingler is not a Echinochloa. sent12: that the motoneuron is both basaltic and not a frizz does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the tarot is not a kind of a hyaloplasm and it is not consubstantial.; int1 -> int2: the tarot is not a kind of a hyaloplasm.; sent1 -> int3: if the tarot is not a hyaloplasm it is a kind of a Echinochloa that determines tarot.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the tarot is a Echinochloa and it does determine tarot.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__