there exists something such that it is not a whinstone and is a kind of a vehicle.
sent1: if a politic thing is merciless then the fact that it does not mush proctologist is not wrong. sent2: that the peludo ravens propriety and it is merciless is correct. sent3: the peludo is not a kind of a whinstone. sent4: the heart is kinesthetic. sent5: that the soldierfish aurifies outhouse or it does not coif or both is not correct. sent6: the hatchet does not aurify Mauritian and is neuromuscular. sent7: there exists something such that it does aurify Mauritian and is a kind of a whinstone. sent8: the peludo does aurify Mauritian. sent9: the hem is not a whinstone and is a vehicle if the heart is a whinstone. sent10: The Mauritian does aurify peludo. sent11: the peludo does mush proctologist if the fact that the Corchorus is Augustan or it is not proactive or both is not correct. sent12: the hem is not proactive. sent13: something does not raven perpetration if it does not liquefy disturber. sent14: that something is Augustan or it is not proactive or both is incorrect if it does not aurify outhouse. sent15: the heart is causative. sent16: the heart is a whinstone if the Corchorus does aurify outhouse. sent17: if the Corchorus is non-pyrotechnic it is not anaphylactic. sent18: the hem does aurify outhouse and it is a vehicle.
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the Corchorus does not aurify outhouse is not false then the fact that it is Augustan and/or it is not proactive is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Corchorus does not aurify outhouse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the Corchorus is Augustan and/or not proactive is not correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the peludo does mush proctologist.; sent1 -> int4: the peludo does not mush proctologist if it is politic and it is merciless.; sent2 -> int5: the peludo is merciless.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is not a whinstone and is a kind of a vehicle. ; $context$ = sent1: if a politic thing is merciless then the fact that it does not mush proctologist is not wrong. sent2: that the peludo ravens propriety and it is merciless is correct. sent3: the peludo is not a kind of a whinstone. sent4: the heart is kinesthetic. sent5: that the soldierfish aurifies outhouse or it does not coif or both is not correct. sent6: the hatchet does not aurify Mauritian and is neuromuscular. sent7: there exists something such that it does aurify Mauritian and is a kind of a whinstone. sent8: the peludo does aurify Mauritian. sent9: the hem is not a whinstone and is a vehicle if the heart is a whinstone. sent10: The Mauritian does aurify peludo. sent11: the peludo does mush proctologist if the fact that the Corchorus is Augustan or it is not proactive or both is not correct. sent12: the hem is not proactive. sent13: something does not raven perpetration if it does not liquefy disturber. sent14: that something is Augustan or it is not proactive or both is incorrect if it does not aurify outhouse. sent15: the heart is causative. sent16: the heart is a whinstone if the Corchorus does aurify outhouse. sent17: if the Corchorus is non-pyrotechnic it is not anaphylactic. sent18: the hem does aurify outhouse and it is a vehicle. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the Corchorus does not aurify outhouse is not false then the fact that it is Augustan and/or it is not proactive is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Corchorus does not aurify outhouse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the Corchorus is Augustan and/or not proactive is not correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the peludo does mush proctologist.; sent1 -> int4: the peludo does not mush proctologist if it is politic and it is merciless.; sent2 -> int5: the peludo is merciless.; __UNKNOWN__