the snuffling commercial happens.
sent1: if that the vibration does not occur is wrong the non-obviousness and the convenientness happens. sent2: either the effervescentness or the Germanness or both occurs if the armorialness does not occur. sent3: not the coexisting but the inalienableness happens if the discordance does not occur. sent4: that the skinny-diping does not occur is triggered by that not the coexisting but the inalienableness happens. sent5: if the skinny-diping does not occur the vibration and the invasion occurs. sent6: the hugging measured is prevented by that both the frisk and the benediction occurs. sent7: if the German occurs that the snuffling commercial happens is right. sent8: the hugging Petronius does not occur and the letting does not occur. sent9: the discordance does not occur if the hugging Petronius does not occur and the hugging measured does not occur. sent10: if the obviousness does not occur then the fact that both the snuffling commercial and the armorialness occurs is wrong. sent11: if the effervescentness occurs then that the snuffling commercial happens is not wrong.
the snuffling commercial does not occur.
sent8 -> int1: the hugging Petronius does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the snuffling commercial happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the vibration does not occur is wrong the non-obviousness and the convenientness happens. sent2: either the effervescentness or the Germanness or both occurs if the armorialness does not occur. sent3: not the coexisting but the inalienableness happens if the discordance does not occur. sent4: that the skinny-diping does not occur is triggered by that not the coexisting but the inalienableness happens. sent5: if the skinny-diping does not occur the vibration and the invasion occurs. sent6: the hugging measured is prevented by that both the frisk and the benediction occurs. sent7: if the German occurs that the snuffling commercial happens is right. sent8: the hugging Petronius does not occur and the letting does not occur. sent9: the discordance does not occur if the hugging Petronius does not occur and the hugging measured does not occur. sent10: if the obviousness does not occur then the fact that both the snuffling commercial and the armorialness occurs is wrong. sent11: if the effervescentness occurs then that the snuffling commercial happens is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__