the remediableness occurs.
sent1: the probableness does not occur if that that the implementation does not occur but the probableness happens is incorrect is right. sent2: the fact that the non-annalisticness and the dispersing occurs is not true if the auditoriness occurs. sent3: if that the annalisticness does not occur but the dispersing occurs does not hold then that the dispersing does not occur is right. sent4: if that the probable does not occur is true the calibration does not occur and the turkey does not occur. sent5: the remediableness does not occur if the fact that the non-Brobdingnagianness or the intussuscepting or both happens is false. sent6: if the intussuscepting happens the battledore does not occur. sent7: the battledore happens and the dispersing occurs. sent8: that the dispersing does not occur triggers that the remediableness occurs and the battledore happens. sent9: the unprofitableness does not occur if the fact that the unprofitableness occurs but the amending does not occur is not true. sent10: the fact that the unprofitableness happens and the amending does not occur does not hold if the maternalness happens. sent11: that the turkey does not occur causes the ductlessness or the concluding or both. sent12: if the unprofitableness does not occur then the fact that not the implementation but the probable occurs does not hold. sent13: that the Brobdingnagianness does not occur and/or that the intussuscepting happens leads to that the battledore does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-Brobdingnagianness or the intussuscepting or both occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the battledore does not occur.; sent7 -> int2: the battledore occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the non-Brobdingnagianness or the intussuscepting or both occurs does not hold.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the remediableness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the remediableness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the probableness does not occur if that that the implementation does not occur but the probableness happens is incorrect is right. sent2: the fact that the non-annalisticness and the dispersing occurs is not true if the auditoriness occurs. sent3: if that the annalisticness does not occur but the dispersing occurs does not hold then that the dispersing does not occur is right. sent4: if that the probable does not occur is true the calibration does not occur and the turkey does not occur. sent5: the remediableness does not occur if the fact that the non-Brobdingnagianness or the intussuscepting or both happens is false. sent6: if the intussuscepting happens the battledore does not occur. sent7: the battledore happens and the dispersing occurs. sent8: that the dispersing does not occur triggers that the remediableness occurs and the battledore happens. sent9: the unprofitableness does not occur if the fact that the unprofitableness occurs but the amending does not occur is not true. sent10: the fact that the unprofitableness happens and the amending does not occur does not hold if the maternalness happens. sent11: that the turkey does not occur causes the ductlessness or the concluding or both. sent12: if the unprofitableness does not occur then the fact that not the implementation but the probable occurs does not hold. sent13: that the Brobdingnagianness does not occur and/or that the intussuscepting happens leads to that the battledore does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-Brobdingnagianness or the intussuscepting or both occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the battledore does not occur.; sent7 -> int2: the battledore occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the non-Brobdingnagianness or the intussuscepting or both occurs does not hold.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__