the ununpentium is not a hyssop.
sent1: if the Parisienne is not profane and not a silverpoint the ununpentium is a hyssop. sent2: the rathole is not voyeuristic if the fact that the Parisienne is not profane and is not a silverpoint is not correct. sent3: the ununpentium does not differ and it is not voyeuristic. sent4: the Parisienne is not a hyssop if the fact that the ununpentium is not a silverpoint and is not voyeuristic is not right. sent5: the rathole is not a kind of a hyssop if the fact that the ununpentium is not a silverpoint and is not voyeuristic is false. sent6: the rathole is voyeuristic. sent7: that if the prizefighter is Manchurian then the rathole is non-voyeuristic but it is a kind of a hyssop hold. sent8: the fact that everything is a kind of a stocks hold. sent9: the Parisienne is not profane and not a hyssop. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not Manchurian and is unactable does not hold the prizefighter is Manchurian. sent11: if that the ununpentium is not a hyssop and it is not voyeuristic is not correct the rathole is not profane. sent12: the Parisienne is non-profane and not voyeuristic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Parisienne is not profane and not a silverpoint does not hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the rathole is not voyeuristic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Parisienne is not profane and it is not a silverpoint.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the ununpentium is not a kind of a hyssop.
sent8 -> int4: the bell does stock.;
$hypothesis$ = the ununpentium is not a hyssop. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Parisienne is not profane and not a silverpoint the ununpentium is a hyssop. sent2: the rathole is not voyeuristic if the fact that the Parisienne is not profane and is not a silverpoint is not correct. sent3: the ununpentium does not differ and it is not voyeuristic. sent4: the Parisienne is not a hyssop if the fact that the ununpentium is not a silverpoint and is not voyeuristic is not right. sent5: the rathole is not a kind of a hyssop if the fact that the ununpentium is not a silverpoint and is not voyeuristic is false. sent6: the rathole is voyeuristic. sent7: that if the prizefighter is Manchurian then the rathole is non-voyeuristic but it is a kind of a hyssop hold. sent8: the fact that everything is a kind of a stocks hold. sent9: the Parisienne is not profane and not a hyssop. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not Manchurian and is unactable does not hold the prizefighter is Manchurian. sent11: if that the ununpentium is not a hyssop and it is not voyeuristic is not correct the rathole is not profane. sent12: the Parisienne is non-profane and not voyeuristic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Parisienne is not profane and not a silverpoint does not hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the rathole is not voyeuristic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Parisienne is not profane and it is not a silverpoint.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__