the temazepam is not a kind of a centralism.
sent1: there exists something such that either it does not fidget focused or it does legitimate or both. sent2: the fact that either the serge is not a centralism or it is fiducial or both is not right. sent3: the fact that the temazepam is not a kind of a centralism is right if there is something such that that it does not fidget focused and/or it does legitimate is incorrect. sent4: if something is not interplanetary then that it fidgets keel and it is a decasyllable does not hold. sent5: that the serge does not fidget focused or does legitimate or both is not correct if the cupola is not a fairyland. sent6: the serge does not legitimate. sent7: the serge does not fidget acromegaly. sent8: if that the serge does not sun caspase and it is not blastospheric is false then it is not interplanetary. sent9: there is something such that that it is not legitimate and/or it is a centralism does not hold. sent10: there is something such that the fact that either it fidgets focused or it does legitimate or both is wrong. sent11: the serge is not a centralism if there is something such that that it is not legitimate or it is a fairyland or both is not true. sent12: the fact that there exists something such that it does fidget focused is not incorrect. sent13: the cupola is not a kind of a fairyland. sent14: there is something such that it is not legitimate. sent15: if the cupola does not fidget keel then the temazepam is a centralism and it is a kind of a fairyland. sent16: the serge does not legitimate if that the cupola is not a fairyland hold. sent17: that something does not sun caspase and is not blastospheric does not hold if it is a Woden.
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the serge does not fidget focused and/or legitimates is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not fidget focused and/or does legitimate is not correct.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the temazepam is a kind of a centralism.
sent4 -> int3: if the serge is non-interplanetary that it fidgets keel and is a decasyllable is not true.; sent17 -> int4: if the serge is a Woden then the fact that it does not sun caspase and it is not blastospheric is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the temazepam is not a kind of a centralism. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that either it does not fidget focused or it does legitimate or both. sent2: the fact that either the serge is not a centralism or it is fiducial or both is not right. sent3: the fact that the temazepam is not a kind of a centralism is right if there is something such that that it does not fidget focused and/or it does legitimate is incorrect. sent4: if something is not interplanetary then that it fidgets keel and it is a decasyllable does not hold. sent5: that the serge does not fidget focused or does legitimate or both is not correct if the cupola is not a fairyland. sent6: the serge does not legitimate. sent7: the serge does not fidget acromegaly. sent8: if that the serge does not sun caspase and it is not blastospheric is false then it is not interplanetary. sent9: there is something such that that it is not legitimate and/or it is a centralism does not hold. sent10: there is something such that the fact that either it fidgets focused or it does legitimate or both is wrong. sent11: the serge is not a centralism if there is something such that that it is not legitimate or it is a fairyland or both is not true. sent12: the fact that there exists something such that it does fidget focused is not incorrect. sent13: the cupola is not a kind of a fairyland. sent14: there is something such that it is not legitimate. sent15: if the cupola does not fidget keel then the temazepam is a centralism and it is a kind of a fairyland. sent16: the serge does not legitimate if that the cupola is not a fairyland hold. sent17: that something does not sun caspase and is not blastospheric does not hold if it is a Woden. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the serge does not fidget focused and/or legitimates is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not fidget focused and/or does legitimate is not correct.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__