the fact that the Mayflower does not instrument roisterer is true.
sent1: the pilocarpine does instrument bilby and is a Condorcet if the erotic does not fingerprint aquatic. sent2: if that the decoupage is a arboriculture or not inconstant or both is not right that the lost-and-found is not a kind of a arboriculture is not wrong. sent3: the XX does catalyze Sabal and it catalyzes trifler. sent4: the water-mint is not a barbasco if the lost-and-found is proportionate but it is not tame. sent5: that the bilby fingerprints aquatic and is a Condorcet is not correct if the Mayflower does not instrument bilby. sent6: the bilby is non-radiotelephonic thing that is not a Condorcet. sent7: the roisterer is radiotelephonic and/or it is a judgeship if there exists something such that it is radiotelephonic. sent8: if the XX catalyzes Sabal the log is not a duck or is radiotelephonic or both. sent9: the fact that if the roisterer is a judgeship then the chokecherry is radiotelephonic is not false. sent10: that something is not a Condorcet but it does instrument bilby is false if it does not fingerprint aquatic. sent11: the Mayflower does instrument roisterer if the bilby does instrument roisterer. sent12: if something is not a kind of a barbasco it is not acetic and is not a utricle. sent13: if the fact that something is radiotelephonic and does not fingerprint aquatic does not hold then it does not instrument bilby. sent14: if the log is not a duck or it is radiotelephonic or both the ornamentation is radiotelephonic. sent15: the electromagnet is not archival if it fingerprints Thessalian. sent16: if the Mayflower is not radiotelephonic then the bilby is not a kind of a Periplaneta and does not slice pilocarpine. sent17: if the roisterer is radiotelephonic the chokecherry is radiotelephonic. sent18: if the lost-and-found is not a kind of a arboriculture then the fact that it is proportionate thing that is not tame hold. sent19: if the water-mint is both not acetic and not a utricle then the erotic does not fingerprint aquatic. sent20: the pilocarpine is radiotelephonic if the chokecherry is radiotelephonic. sent21: if that something does instrument bilby but it does not fingerprint aquatic is not true it does not instrument roisterer.
sent6 -> int1: the bilby is not radiotelephonic.; sent21 -> int2: the Mayflower does not instrument roisterer if the fact that it does instrument bilby and does not fingerprint aquatic is wrong.;
that the Mayflower instruments roisterer hold.
sent3 -> int3: the XX catalyzes Sabal.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the log is not a kind of a duck and/or is radiotelephonic.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the ornamentation is radiotelephonic.; int5 -> int6: something is radiotelephonic.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the roisterer is radiotelephonic or a judgeship or both.; int7 & sent17 & sent9 -> int8: the chokecherry is radiotelephonic.; sent20 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the pilocarpine is radiotelephonic is correct.; sent12 -> int10: the water-mint is not acetic and it is not a utricle if the fact that it is not a barbasco is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Mayflower does not instrument roisterer is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the pilocarpine does instrument bilby and is a Condorcet if the erotic does not fingerprint aquatic. sent2: if that the decoupage is a arboriculture or not inconstant or both is not right that the lost-and-found is not a kind of a arboriculture is not wrong. sent3: the XX does catalyze Sabal and it catalyzes trifler. sent4: the water-mint is not a barbasco if the lost-and-found is proportionate but it is not tame. sent5: that the bilby fingerprints aquatic and is a Condorcet is not correct if the Mayflower does not instrument bilby. sent6: the bilby is non-radiotelephonic thing that is not a Condorcet. sent7: the roisterer is radiotelephonic and/or it is a judgeship if there exists something such that it is radiotelephonic. sent8: if the XX catalyzes Sabal the log is not a duck or is radiotelephonic or both. sent9: the fact that if the roisterer is a judgeship then the chokecherry is radiotelephonic is not false. sent10: that something is not a Condorcet but it does instrument bilby is false if it does not fingerprint aquatic. sent11: the Mayflower does instrument roisterer if the bilby does instrument roisterer. sent12: if something is not a kind of a barbasco it is not acetic and is not a utricle. sent13: if the fact that something is radiotelephonic and does not fingerprint aquatic does not hold then it does not instrument bilby. sent14: if the log is not a duck or it is radiotelephonic or both the ornamentation is radiotelephonic. sent15: the electromagnet is not archival if it fingerprints Thessalian. sent16: if the Mayflower is not radiotelephonic then the bilby is not a kind of a Periplaneta and does not slice pilocarpine. sent17: if the roisterer is radiotelephonic the chokecherry is radiotelephonic. sent18: if the lost-and-found is not a kind of a arboriculture then the fact that it is proportionate thing that is not tame hold. sent19: if the water-mint is both not acetic and not a utricle then the erotic does not fingerprint aquatic. sent20: the pilocarpine is radiotelephonic if the chokecherry is radiotelephonic. sent21: if that something does instrument bilby but it does not fingerprint aquatic is not true it does not instrument roisterer. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the bilby is not radiotelephonic.; sent21 -> int2: the Mayflower does not instrument roisterer if the fact that it does instrument bilby and does not fingerprint aquatic is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__