the flap does not occur.
sent1: that the tripping Rigil does not occur but the wages happens is not correct if the fact that the Frenchifying beanball happens is correct. sent2: that the countercurrent does not occur brings about that the perceptiveness does not occur but the administrativeness occurs. sent3: that both the masterpiece and the preoccupancy happens prevents that the nonparticulateness happens. sent4: the preoccupancy does not occur if the nonparticulateness happens but the countercurrent does not occur. sent5: the Frenchifying beanball occurs. sent6: that the tripping Rigil does not occur and the wages happens if the masterpiece does not occur is true. sent7: that the flapping does not occur but the masterpiece happens is brought about by that the preoccupancy does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the nonparticulateness does not occur is correct then the countercurrent does not occur. sent9: the preoccupancy and the hearing zinnwaldite occurs. sent10: that the flap does not occur is prevented by that both the unperceptiveness and the administrativeness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the masterpiece does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: not the tripping Rigil but the wages occurs.; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the tripping Rigil does not occur and the wages happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the masterpiece occurs.; sent9 -> int5: the preoccupancy happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the masterpiece and the preoccupancy happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the nonparticulateness does not occur.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the countercurrent does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: not the perceptiveness but the administrativeness occurs.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the flapping does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the flap does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tripping Rigil does not occur but the wages happens is not correct if the fact that the Frenchifying beanball happens is correct. sent2: that the countercurrent does not occur brings about that the perceptiveness does not occur but the administrativeness occurs. sent3: that both the masterpiece and the preoccupancy happens prevents that the nonparticulateness happens. sent4: the preoccupancy does not occur if the nonparticulateness happens but the countercurrent does not occur. sent5: the Frenchifying beanball occurs. sent6: that the tripping Rigil does not occur and the wages happens if the masterpiece does not occur is true. sent7: that the flapping does not occur but the masterpiece happens is brought about by that the preoccupancy does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the nonparticulateness does not occur is correct then the countercurrent does not occur. sent9: the preoccupancy and the hearing zinnwaldite occurs. sent10: that the flap does not occur is prevented by that both the unperceptiveness and the administrativeness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the masterpiece does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: not the tripping Rigil but the wages occurs.; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the tripping Rigil does not occur and the wages happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the masterpiece occurs.; sent9 -> int5: the preoccupancy happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the masterpiece and the preoccupancy happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the nonparticulateness does not occur.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the countercurrent does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: not the perceptiveness but the administrativeness occurs.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__