the glacier is a watchtower and is not a sudoku.
sent1: the nipple is not prostate if the scriptorium is not a kind of a selectivity. sent2: the nipple is a kind of a prostate. sent3: the nipple is a glow but not non-vitreous if the glacier is not avionic. sent4: something does not crust bonbon and it is not a sudoku if it is a glow. sent5: something is a selectivity and it is acquisitive if the fact that it is not a prostate is right. sent6: if the bonbon is not a watchtower that the glacier is a watchtower and not a sudoku is not incorrect. sent7: the bonbon is not a kind of a prostate if something does not crust bonbon and is not a sudoku. sent8: if something is advisable and it is fishy that the glacier is not avionic is correct. sent9: the scriptorium is a kind of a watchtower if the bonbon is acquisitive. sent10: the Dominican is advisable and fishy. sent11: if the scriptorium is not acquisitive the nipple is not a prostate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scriptorium is either not acquisitive or not a selectivity or both.; assump1 & sent11 & sent1 -> int1: the nipple is not a prostate.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the scriptorium is not acquisitive or it is not a selectivity or both is incorrect.;
the scriptorium is a watchtower.
sent5 -> int4: if the fact that the bonbon is not a prostate is right it is a selectivity that is acquisitive.; sent4 -> int5: the nipple does not crust bonbon and is not a kind of a sudoku if it is a glow.; sent10 -> int6: something is both advisable and fishy.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the glacier is not avionic.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the nipple does glow and it is vitreous.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the nipple is a kind of a glow is not false.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the nipple does not crust bonbon and it is not a sudoku.; int10 -> int11: something does not crust bonbon and is not a sudoku.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the bonbon is not a prostate.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the bonbon is a selectivity and acquisitive.; int13 -> int14: that the bonbon is acquisitive hold.; sent9 & int14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the glacier is a watchtower and is not a sudoku. ; $context$ = sent1: the nipple is not prostate if the scriptorium is not a kind of a selectivity. sent2: the nipple is a kind of a prostate. sent3: the nipple is a glow but not non-vitreous if the glacier is not avionic. sent4: something does not crust bonbon and it is not a sudoku if it is a glow. sent5: something is a selectivity and it is acquisitive if the fact that it is not a prostate is right. sent6: if the bonbon is not a watchtower that the glacier is a watchtower and not a sudoku is not incorrect. sent7: the bonbon is not a kind of a prostate if something does not crust bonbon and is not a sudoku. sent8: if something is advisable and it is fishy that the glacier is not avionic is correct. sent9: the scriptorium is a kind of a watchtower if the bonbon is acquisitive. sent10: the Dominican is advisable and fishy. sent11: if the scriptorium is not acquisitive the nipple is not a prostate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scriptorium is either not acquisitive or not a selectivity or both.; assump1 & sent11 & sent1 -> int1: the nipple is not a prostate.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the scriptorium is not acquisitive or it is not a selectivity or both is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__