the port is both not a dovishness and not ascitic.
sent1: something spring-cleans if that it is Palladian hold. sent2: that the port is both not a dovishness and not ascitic is not right if the arrack is not ascitic. sent3: if something is Palladian and it is a dovishness then the port does not spring-clean. sent4: the monoxide is a dovishness. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a jibboom. sent6: if something is not a kind of a jibboom the polyurethane is not chaetognathan or is not impassable or both. sent7: if something that romances is Ghanaian the arrack is not ascitic. sent8: the polyurethane does spring-clean and is Palladian. sent9: the fact that the port is not a dovishness but it is ascitic does not hold. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a romance the besieger does not spring-clean and is non-Palladian. sent11: if something is a romance it is Palladian. sent12: the fact that something is Ghanaian thing that does not lob Yaounde is false if it is not chaetognathan. sent13: there exists something such that it is a dovishness and is ascitic. sent14: something that does not spring-clean and is not Palladian is not Ghanaian. sent15: there is something such that it is a romance. sent16: something is not a dovishness and is not ascitic if it spring-cleans. sent17: the airfoil does lob Yaounde. sent18: something is not chaetognathan if it is not chaetognathan and/or it is not impassable. sent19: the airfoil is Ghanaian if it lobs Yaounde. sent20: the fact that the port is not a kind of a dovishness but it is ascitic is incorrect if the arrack is not ascitic. sent21: The Yaounde does lob airfoil. sent22: that the arrack is a dovishness is correct. sent23: if the arrack is not ascitic that the fact that the port is a dovishness but it is not ascitic is correct is wrong. sent24: if the polyurethane spring-cleans the airfoil romances.
sent8 -> int1: the polyurethane does spring-clean.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the airfoil does romance.; sent19 & sent17 -> int3: the airfoil is Ghanaian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the airfoil romances and it is Ghanaian.; int4 -> int5: something is a romance and is Ghanaian.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the arrack is not ascitic.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the besieger is Ghanaian.
sent14 -> int7: that the besieger is Ghanaian if the fact that the besieger does not spring-clean and is non-Palladian is not incorrect is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the port is both not a dovishness and not ascitic. ; $context$ = sent1: something spring-cleans if that it is Palladian hold. sent2: that the port is both not a dovishness and not ascitic is not right if the arrack is not ascitic. sent3: if something is Palladian and it is a dovishness then the port does not spring-clean. sent4: the monoxide is a dovishness. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a jibboom. sent6: if something is not a kind of a jibboom the polyurethane is not chaetognathan or is not impassable or both. sent7: if something that romances is Ghanaian the arrack is not ascitic. sent8: the polyurethane does spring-clean and is Palladian. sent9: the fact that the port is not a dovishness but it is ascitic does not hold. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a romance the besieger does not spring-clean and is non-Palladian. sent11: if something is a romance it is Palladian. sent12: the fact that something is Ghanaian thing that does not lob Yaounde is false if it is not chaetognathan. sent13: there exists something such that it is a dovishness and is ascitic. sent14: something that does not spring-clean and is not Palladian is not Ghanaian. sent15: there is something such that it is a romance. sent16: something is not a dovishness and is not ascitic if it spring-cleans. sent17: the airfoil does lob Yaounde. sent18: something is not chaetognathan if it is not chaetognathan and/or it is not impassable. sent19: the airfoil is Ghanaian if it lobs Yaounde. sent20: the fact that the port is not a kind of a dovishness but it is ascitic is incorrect if the arrack is not ascitic. sent21: The Yaounde does lob airfoil. sent22: that the arrack is a dovishness is correct. sent23: if the arrack is not ascitic that the fact that the port is a dovishness but it is not ascitic is correct is wrong. sent24: if the polyurethane spring-cleans the airfoil romances. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the polyurethane does spring-clean.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the airfoil does romance.; sent19 & sent17 -> int3: the airfoil is Ghanaian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the airfoil romances and it is Ghanaian.; int4 -> int5: something is a romance and is Ghanaian.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the arrack is not ascitic.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__