the plate is not ulnar.
sent1: the confit is baboonish and it dwarfs duckpins. sent2: the asterion is a kind of a pragmatics and/or it is not a soundboard if there is something such that it is baboonish. sent3: if something does not syllogize then it is not tuberous. sent4: the plate is ulnar if the fact that the Baptist is cathodic is right. sent5: the fact that the plate is not cathodic and does interfere plate is right. sent6: the plate is not arbitrable if it does not interfere confit. sent7: the wall does not interfere plate. sent8: if the plate is cathodic then the ultraviolet is not cathodic.
sent5 -> int1: the plate is non-cathodic.;
the plate is ulnar.
sent1 -> int2: the confit is baboonish.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is baboonish is not incorrect.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: either the asterion is a pragmatics or it is not a soundboard or both.; int4 -> int5: something is a kind of a pragmatics and/or it is not a soundboard.;
$hypothesis$ = the plate is not ulnar. ; $context$ = sent1: the confit is baboonish and it dwarfs duckpins. sent2: the asterion is a kind of a pragmatics and/or it is not a soundboard if there is something such that it is baboonish. sent3: if something does not syllogize then it is not tuberous. sent4: the plate is ulnar if the fact that the Baptist is cathodic is right. sent5: the fact that the plate is not cathodic and does interfere plate is right. sent6: the plate is not arbitrable if it does not interfere confit. sent7: the wall does not interfere plate. sent8: if the plate is cathodic then the ultraviolet is not cathodic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the plate is non-cathodic.; __UNKNOWN__