there exists something such that it does credit quire and enters Himalayish.
sent1: the hailstone does credit cabotage. sent2: the Mattole is a Tang if a bronchial thing is not impassable. sent3: if that the Mattole is not a Tang and it is not ergotropic does not hold then the Maratha is a Tang. sent4: The quire does credit pass-through. sent5: that the pass-through does enter Himalayish and does not credit quire is not correct if it does credit cabotage. sent6: the progenitor is bronchial. sent7: something is bronchial and it is impassable. sent8: if the fact that the progenitor is bronchial but it is not impassable is not correct the pass-through does enter Himalayish. sent9: if the progenitor is not bronchial the pass-through enters Himalayish. sent10: The cabotage does credit vesicant. sent11: the pass-through is non-conceptualistic thing that is bronchial. sent12: if the Mattole is a Tang then the fact that the vesicant is not a Tang but ergotropic is false. sent13: if the vesicant does credit cabotage it is not a Tang. sent14: something is not a kind of a Tang and is ergotropic if it does credit cabotage. sent15: the pass-through does credit quire. sent16: there is something such that it is bronchial. sent17: that something does enter Himalayish is not incorrect. sent18: the vesicant does credit cabotage. sent19: there is something such that it credits quire.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the progenitor is bronchial but it is not impassable.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is bronchial and it is not impassable.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Mattole is a Tang.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that that the vesicant is not a Tang but it is ergotropic is not wrong is not true.; sent14 -> int4: the vesicant is not a Tang but ergotropic if it does credit cabotage.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the vesicant is not a Tang and is ergotropic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the progenitor is bronchial and is not impassable is not true.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the pass-through does enter Himalayish.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the pass-through credits quire and enters Himalayish.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the Maratha is a Tang.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does credit quire and enters Himalayish. ; $context$ = sent1: the hailstone does credit cabotage. sent2: the Mattole is a Tang if a bronchial thing is not impassable. sent3: if that the Mattole is not a Tang and it is not ergotropic does not hold then the Maratha is a Tang. sent4: The quire does credit pass-through. sent5: that the pass-through does enter Himalayish and does not credit quire is not correct if it does credit cabotage. sent6: the progenitor is bronchial. sent7: something is bronchial and it is impassable. sent8: if the fact that the progenitor is bronchial but it is not impassable is not correct the pass-through does enter Himalayish. sent9: if the progenitor is not bronchial the pass-through enters Himalayish. sent10: The cabotage does credit vesicant. sent11: the pass-through is non-conceptualistic thing that is bronchial. sent12: if the Mattole is a Tang then the fact that the vesicant is not a Tang but ergotropic is false. sent13: if the vesicant does credit cabotage it is not a Tang. sent14: something is not a kind of a Tang and is ergotropic if it does credit cabotage. sent15: the pass-through does credit quire. sent16: there is something such that it is bronchial. sent17: that something does enter Himalayish is not incorrect. sent18: the vesicant does credit cabotage. sent19: there is something such that it credits quire. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the progenitor is bronchial but it is not impassable.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is bronchial and it is not impassable.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Mattole is a Tang.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that that the vesicant is not a Tang but it is ergotropic is not wrong is not true.; sent14 -> int4: the vesicant is not a Tang but ergotropic if it does credit cabotage.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the vesicant is not a Tang and is ergotropic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the progenitor is bronchial and is not impassable is not true.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the pass-through does enter Himalayish.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the pass-through credits quire and enters Himalayish.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__