the tastebud is a fecundity.
sent1: if the shear conglutinates then it is homeopathic. sent2: the tastebud is not a fecundity if the fact that the thyroid is not a fecundity and it is not homeopathic is not false. sent3: if the shear does not encapsulate decline the quill is a thermel or does not encapsulate decline or both. sent4: the thyroid is not a fecundity and not homeopathic if the shear conglutinates. sent5: if something is not a kind of a fief and is a thermel then it does encapsulate decline. sent6: the shear is a kind of a Icelandic if the fact that the quill is a Icelandic is right. sent7: the tastebud is a fecundity if the quill is a thermel. sent8: if that something does not conglutinate and is not a fecundity is incorrect then it does conglutinate. sent9: if there are homeopathic things the thyroid does not encapsulate trimming. sent10: if there exists something such that it conglutinates the shear does not encapsulate decline. sent11: the thyroid is homeopathic and/or it does not encapsulate decline. sent12: if the quill does not encapsulate decline the tastebud is a fecundity. sent13: the parsnip encapsulates trimming if the thyroid does not encapsulates trimming. sent14: the tastebud does encapsulate decline or it is a fecundity or both. sent15: the thyroid is homeopathic. sent16: if the quill does conglutinate then the shear conglutinate. sent17: the fact that something is not a kind of a fief but it is a thermel is right if it is a kind of a Icelandic.
sent15 -> int1: the thyroid is homeopathic and/or it conglutinates.; int1 -> int2: something is homeopathic and/or it conglutinates.;
the tastebud is not a kind of a fecundity.
sent5 -> int3: if the shear is not a fief but it is a kind of a thermel it does encapsulate decline.; sent17 -> int4: the shear is not a fief and is a thermel if it is a Icelandic.;
$hypothesis$ = the tastebud is a fecundity. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shear conglutinates then it is homeopathic. sent2: the tastebud is not a fecundity if the fact that the thyroid is not a fecundity and it is not homeopathic is not false. sent3: if the shear does not encapsulate decline the quill is a thermel or does not encapsulate decline or both. sent4: the thyroid is not a fecundity and not homeopathic if the shear conglutinates. sent5: if something is not a kind of a fief and is a thermel then it does encapsulate decline. sent6: the shear is a kind of a Icelandic if the fact that the quill is a Icelandic is right. sent7: the tastebud is a fecundity if the quill is a thermel. sent8: if that something does not conglutinate and is not a fecundity is incorrect then it does conglutinate. sent9: if there are homeopathic things the thyroid does not encapsulate trimming. sent10: if there exists something such that it conglutinates the shear does not encapsulate decline. sent11: the thyroid is homeopathic and/or it does not encapsulate decline. sent12: if the quill does not encapsulate decline the tastebud is a fecundity. sent13: the parsnip encapsulates trimming if the thyroid does not encapsulates trimming. sent14: the tastebud does encapsulate decline or it is a fecundity or both. sent15: the thyroid is homeopathic. sent16: if the quill does conglutinate then the shear conglutinate. sent17: the fact that something is not a kind of a fief but it is a thermel is right if it is a kind of a Icelandic. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the thyroid is homeopathic and/or it conglutinates.; int1 -> int2: something is homeopathic and/or it conglutinates.; __UNKNOWN__