there exists something such that if it is a blouse it is not a secrecy and it does not exacerbate havelock.
sent1: if the overlip is a blouse then it is not a secrecy and exacerbates havelock. sent2: the overlip is not a secrecy if it is a kind of a blouse. sent3: there is something such that if it is a blouse then the fact that it does not exacerbate havelock is not wrong. sent4: if something is a vitiligo then it does not drain egg and is not chimerical. sent5: the overlip is not a secrecy and does not exacerbate havelock if it is a kind of a blouse. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a blouse it is a secrecy and it does not exacerbate havelock.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is a kind of a vitiligo then it does not drain egg and it is not chimerical.
sent4 -> int1: the havelock does not drain egg and is not chimerical if that it is a vitiligo is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a blouse it is not a secrecy and it does not exacerbate havelock. ; $context$ = sent1: if the overlip is a blouse then it is not a secrecy and exacerbates havelock. sent2: the overlip is not a secrecy if it is a kind of a blouse. sent3: there is something such that if it is a blouse then the fact that it does not exacerbate havelock is not wrong. sent4: if something is a vitiligo then it does not drain egg and is not chimerical. sent5: the overlip is not a secrecy and does not exacerbate havelock if it is a kind of a blouse. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a blouse it is a secrecy and it does not exacerbate havelock. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__