the fact that that the raking creole-fish does not occur brings about that the congenericness but not the beginning ribbon occurs is wrong.
sent1: that the kinestheticness happens is triggered by that the recidivism happens. sent2: that the springtide does not occur brings about that the strand does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the fact that the seminalness occurs and the beginning ribbon occurs does not hold hold then the beginning ribbon does not occur. sent4: the congenericness happens but the beginning ribbon does not occur if the raking creole-fish happens. sent5: the congenericness happens if the riposting occurs. sent6: the fact that both the seminalness and the beginning ribbon happens is incorrect if the stranding does not occur. sent7: the fact that the springtide does not occur is right. sent8: if the raking creole-fish does not occur the pretending happens and the riposting happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the raking creole-fish does not occur is right.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that both the pretending and the riposting occurs is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: the riposte occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the congenericness occurs.; sent2 & sent7 -> int4: the stranding does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: that the seminalness occurs and the beginning ribbon happens is wrong.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the beginning ribbon does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the congenericness happens but the beginning ribbon does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the raking creole-fish does not occur brings about that the congenericness but not the beginning ribbon occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the kinestheticness happens is triggered by that the recidivism happens. sent2: that the springtide does not occur brings about that the strand does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the fact that the seminalness occurs and the beginning ribbon occurs does not hold hold then the beginning ribbon does not occur. sent4: the congenericness happens but the beginning ribbon does not occur if the raking creole-fish happens. sent5: the congenericness happens if the riposting occurs. sent6: the fact that both the seminalness and the beginning ribbon happens is incorrect if the stranding does not occur. sent7: the fact that the springtide does not occur is right. sent8: if the raking creole-fish does not occur the pretending happens and the riposting happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the raking creole-fish does not occur is right.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that both the pretending and the riposting occurs is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: the riposte occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the congenericness occurs.; sent2 & sent7 -> int4: the stranding does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: that the seminalness occurs and the beginning ribbon happens is wrong.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the beginning ribbon does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the congenericness happens but the beginning ribbon does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__