the photographing Sticherus yields that the hooking does not occur or that the expansion occurs or both.
sent1: that the rushing and the photographing Sticherus occurs prevents the remodeling ESOP. sent2: either the hooks occurs or the expansion happens or both. sent3: the emulsifying lob leads to that the emulsifying assiduity does not occur and/or that the photographing Delichon happens. sent4: the neurotic and the black-and-whiteness happens. sent5: if the photographing lantern does not occur then the sympathectomy does not occur and/or the planking happens. sent6: both the Sufiness and the convenientness occurs. sent7: the downmarketness does not occur. sent8: that the emulsifying excuse happens is right. sent9: if the leglessness does not occur both the adjoining placement and the remodeling Kingston happens. sent10: if the fact that the remodeling ESOP does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the hooks does not occur and/or the expansion occurs is right. sent11: the filialness is prevented by that both the adjoining XXY and the holisticness occurs. sent12: the leglessness does not occur if either the leglessness does not occur or the adjoining raja does not occur or both. sent13: the retirement happens and the rushing happens if the photographing Sticherus does not occur. sent14: the expansion does not occur if both the emulsifying excuse and the adjoining placement happens. sent15: if the remodeling ESOP does not occur the hooking and/or the expansion happens. sent16: that the earning does not occur triggers that the photographing nut does not occur and/or that the pectoralness happens. sent17: either the hooking happens or the expansion happens or both if the photographing Sticherus happens.
the retirement happens.
$hypothesis$ = the photographing Sticherus yields that the hooking does not occur or that the expansion occurs or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the rushing and the photographing Sticherus occurs prevents the remodeling ESOP. sent2: either the hooks occurs or the expansion happens or both. sent3: the emulsifying lob leads to that the emulsifying assiduity does not occur and/or that the photographing Delichon happens. sent4: the neurotic and the black-and-whiteness happens. sent5: if the photographing lantern does not occur then the sympathectomy does not occur and/or the planking happens. sent6: both the Sufiness and the convenientness occurs. sent7: the downmarketness does not occur. sent8: that the emulsifying excuse happens is right. sent9: if the leglessness does not occur both the adjoining placement and the remodeling Kingston happens. sent10: if the fact that the remodeling ESOP does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the hooks does not occur and/or the expansion occurs is right. sent11: the filialness is prevented by that both the adjoining XXY and the holisticness occurs. sent12: the leglessness does not occur if either the leglessness does not occur or the adjoining raja does not occur or both. sent13: the retirement happens and the rushing happens if the photographing Sticherus does not occur. sent14: the expansion does not occur if both the emulsifying excuse and the adjoining placement happens. sent15: if the remodeling ESOP does not occur the hooking and/or the expansion happens. sent16: that the earning does not occur triggers that the photographing nut does not occur and/or that the pectoralness happens. sent17: either the hooking happens or the expansion happens or both if the photographing Sticherus happens. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__