the LAN is nondeductible but it is not a stele.
sent1: if the clawhammer is indusial then that the foramen is both not a Verlaine and indusial is false. sent2: if the fact that the clawhammer is not a nondriver is true the LAN is nondeductible but it is not a kind of a stele. sent3: if the foramen does wow pleonasm the hamstring is Zionist. sent4: if something is not a Verlaine then it is both a nondriver and indusial. sent5: if the elongation is nondeductible then the fact that the LAN is nondeductible but it is not a kind of a stele does not hold. sent6: the fact that something is not a kind of a Zionist and preserves is not right if it is a nondriver. sent7: if the fact that something is not a Verlaine but it is indusial is not true then it does wow pleonasm. sent8: the clawhammer is indusial if it is a nondriver. sent9: if that the foramen does not wow pleonasm and is a Verlaine is incorrect it is a nondriver. sent10: the clawhammer is a nondriver. sent11: the elongation is nondeductible if the hamstring is a kind of a Zionist.
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the clawhammer is indusial.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the fact that the foramen is not a kind of a Verlaine and is indusial does not hold is true.; sent7 -> int3: if that the foramen is not a Verlaine but it is indusial is incorrect it wows pleonasm.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the foramen wows pleonasm.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the hamstring is a kind of a Zionist hold.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the elongation is nondeductible.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the LAN is nondeductible and is not a kind of a stele.
$hypothesis$ = the LAN is nondeductible but it is not a stele. ; $context$ = sent1: if the clawhammer is indusial then that the foramen is both not a Verlaine and indusial is false. sent2: if the fact that the clawhammer is not a nondriver is true the LAN is nondeductible but it is not a kind of a stele. sent3: if the foramen does wow pleonasm the hamstring is Zionist. sent4: if something is not a Verlaine then it is both a nondriver and indusial. sent5: if the elongation is nondeductible then the fact that the LAN is nondeductible but it is not a kind of a stele does not hold. sent6: the fact that something is not a kind of a Zionist and preserves is not right if it is a nondriver. sent7: if the fact that something is not a Verlaine but it is indusial is not true then it does wow pleonasm. sent8: the clawhammer is indusial if it is a nondriver. sent9: if that the foramen does not wow pleonasm and is a Verlaine is incorrect it is a nondriver. sent10: the clawhammer is a nondriver. sent11: the elongation is nondeductible if the hamstring is a kind of a Zionist. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the clawhammer is indusial.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the fact that the foramen is not a kind of a Verlaine and is indusial does not hold is true.; sent7 -> int3: if that the foramen is not a Verlaine but it is indusial is incorrect it wows pleonasm.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the foramen wows pleonasm.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the hamstring is a kind of a Zionist hold.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the elongation is nondeductible.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__