that the cuddy is a rubric that is a systematization does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the liege is a kind of a flipper and it is a systematization is wrong. sent2: there is something such that it is a flipper. sent3: the pad admeasures dogfish. sent4: that the cuddy is a kind of a flipper and is a systematization is false if there is something such that it is not a kind of a rubric. sent5: if the cuddy covers swabbing then it is a rubric. sent6: the fact that the cuddy does rubric and is a kind of a systematization is not right if there is something such that it is not a kind of a flipper. sent7: the cuddy is not a rage. sent8: if the pad does admeasure dogfish the vancomycin is a rise. sent9: if something is a flipper it does rubric. sent10: there is something such that it is a rubric. sent11: the liege is not a Nicaraguan. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a flipper then the fact that the liege rubrics and it is a systematization is not right. sent13: the cuddy is not hadal. sent14: that the liege is a systematization and it is a flipper is not true. sent15: the cuddy does caucus flatiron. sent16: that the liege is a flipper that is a systematization is incorrect if there is something such that it does not rubric. sent17: if the cuddy caucuses flatiron then it is a flipper. sent18: the cuddy is a kind of a systematization and it is a flipper if the perpendicular does not caucus flatiron. sent19: the liege is not a Alabaman. sent20: the cuddy covers swabbing if there is something such that it does rise and/or it covers swabbing.
the cuddy does rubric and it is a systematization.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the vancomycin is a rise.; int1 -> int2: the vancomycin either is a rise or does cover swabbing or both.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that either it does rise or it does cover swabbing or both.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the cuddy covers swabbing.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the cuddy does rubric is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cuddy is a rubric that is a systematization does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the liege is a kind of a flipper and it is a systematization is wrong. sent2: there is something such that it is a flipper. sent3: the pad admeasures dogfish. sent4: that the cuddy is a kind of a flipper and is a systematization is false if there is something such that it is not a kind of a rubric. sent5: if the cuddy covers swabbing then it is a rubric. sent6: the fact that the cuddy does rubric and is a kind of a systematization is not right if there is something such that it is not a kind of a flipper. sent7: the cuddy is not a rage. sent8: if the pad does admeasure dogfish the vancomycin is a rise. sent9: if something is a flipper it does rubric. sent10: there is something such that it is a rubric. sent11: the liege is not a Nicaraguan. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a flipper then the fact that the liege rubrics and it is a systematization is not right. sent13: the cuddy is not hadal. sent14: that the liege is a systematization and it is a flipper is not true. sent15: the cuddy does caucus flatiron. sent16: that the liege is a flipper that is a systematization is incorrect if there is something such that it does not rubric. sent17: if the cuddy caucuses flatiron then it is a flipper. sent18: the cuddy is a kind of a systematization and it is a flipper if the perpendicular does not caucus flatiron. sent19: the liege is not a Alabaman. sent20: the cuddy covers swabbing if there is something such that it does rise and/or it covers swabbing. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__