the fox is not dizygotic and it is not an advance.
sent1: the fox is Rhodesian. sent2: that the fox either does not suture or is not a whoop or both is not right if the inflorescence is not a kind of a Aranyaka. sent3: the inflorescence is not an advance. sent4: if the inflorescence is Rhodesian the fox is not dizygotic. sent5: if the fact that something is not a kind of a suturing and/or it is not a whoop does not hold then it does behold arborvitae. sent6: the fox is a kind of non-dizygotic thing that is not an advance if the inflorescence is Rhodesian. sent7: something is not dizygotic if it beholds arborvitae. sent8: the inflorescence recharges if it does not behold arborvitae. sent9: if that the tridymite does negotiate stay hold then the Miniconju is not mononuclear and it is not gluttonous. sent10: the fox is not dizygotic. sent11: if that the Miniconju is a kind of a whoop is not true then the fact that that the fox is an advance that is a suturing is correct is wrong. sent12: The arborvitae does not behold inflorescence. sent13: the inflorescence does not behold arborvitae. sent14: the inflorescence recharges. sent15: the inflorescence is a kind of pyknotic thing that does report aqua. sent16: the inflorescence is a kind of a Karok. sent17: the inflorescence is both not a Aranyaka and a feedstock if the Miniconju is not mononuclear. sent18: that the tridymite does negotiate stay is not wrong if that it does not negotiate stay and is pudendal is not correct. sent19: the carillonneur is not a headliner and is not Rhodesian.
that the fox is non-dizygotic thing that is not an advance does not hold.
sent5 -> int1: if that that either the fox is not a suturing or it does not whoop or both hold is not correct it does behold arborvitae.;
$hypothesis$ = the fox is not dizygotic and it is not an advance. ; $context$ = sent1: the fox is Rhodesian. sent2: that the fox either does not suture or is not a whoop or both is not right if the inflorescence is not a kind of a Aranyaka. sent3: the inflorescence is not an advance. sent4: if the inflorescence is Rhodesian the fox is not dizygotic. sent5: if the fact that something is not a kind of a suturing and/or it is not a whoop does not hold then it does behold arborvitae. sent6: the fox is a kind of non-dizygotic thing that is not an advance if the inflorescence is Rhodesian. sent7: something is not dizygotic if it beholds arborvitae. sent8: the inflorescence recharges if it does not behold arborvitae. sent9: if that the tridymite does negotiate stay hold then the Miniconju is not mononuclear and it is not gluttonous. sent10: the fox is not dizygotic. sent11: if that the Miniconju is a kind of a whoop is not true then the fact that that the fox is an advance that is a suturing is correct is wrong. sent12: The arborvitae does not behold inflorescence. sent13: the inflorescence does not behold arborvitae. sent14: the inflorescence recharges. sent15: the inflorescence is a kind of pyknotic thing that does report aqua. sent16: the inflorescence is a kind of a Karok. sent17: the inflorescence is both not a Aranyaka and a feedstock if the Miniconju is not mononuclear. sent18: that the tridymite does negotiate stay is not wrong if that it does not negotiate stay and is pudendal is not correct. sent19: the carillonneur is not a headliner and is not Rhodesian. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__