the fact that that the tinning galoot occurs is caused by that the banning does not occur is false.
sent1: the undulation occurs if that the indemnification does not occur and/or the manifesting does not occur does not hold. sent2: that the ban and the packableness occurs is not true if the tinning galoot does not occur. sent3: the transculturalness happens if the fact that the beam does not occur and/or the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur is false. sent4: that the effacing Plantagenet does not occur is prevented by the purr. sent5: the tinning colorist happens. sent6: the roofing saddlecloth does not occur. sent7: the caterwaul occurs. sent8: the choragicness occurs. sent9: if the roofing Shreveport does not occur the adenocarcinomatousness occurs. sent10: the counterclockwiseness occurs if that the Ethiopianness does not occur or the mastery does not occur or both is incorrect. sent11: if the packableness occurs then the tinning galoot occurs. sent12: the ban occurs if the transculturalness occurs. sent13: the transculturalness happens if the fact that the beaming does not occur or the adenocarcinomatousness occurs or both is incorrect. sent14: if the roofing Shreveport happens the packableness occurs. sent15: the effacing Callirhoe happens if that the roofing Shreveport does not occur and the effacing Callirhoe does not occur does not hold. sent16: that that the roofing Shreveport does not occur and the effacing Callirhoe does not occur is not correct is true if the transculturalness does not occur. sent17: the fact that the jellifying happens is right. sent18: that the effacing advancer happens hold. sent19: the palatableness does not occur. sent20: if that the banning happens is not false the tinning galoot occurs. sent21: the adenocarcinomatousness occurs. sent22: the drinking happens. sent23: the fact that the beam does not occur or the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur or both does not hold if the roofing Shreveport does not occur. sent24: the chorusing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the roofing Shreveport does not occur is correct.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: that the beaming does not occur and/or the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur does not hold.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the transculturalness occurs.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the banning occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the banning does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the roofing Shreveport occurs.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the packableness occurs.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the tinning galoot happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the inclusion does not occur is right.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the tinning galoot occurs is caused by that the banning does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the undulation occurs if that the indemnification does not occur and/or the manifesting does not occur does not hold. sent2: that the ban and the packableness occurs is not true if the tinning galoot does not occur. sent3: the transculturalness happens if the fact that the beam does not occur and/or the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur is false. sent4: that the effacing Plantagenet does not occur is prevented by the purr. sent5: the tinning colorist happens. sent6: the roofing saddlecloth does not occur. sent7: the caterwaul occurs. sent8: the choragicness occurs. sent9: if the roofing Shreveport does not occur the adenocarcinomatousness occurs. sent10: the counterclockwiseness occurs if that the Ethiopianness does not occur or the mastery does not occur or both is incorrect. sent11: if the packableness occurs then the tinning galoot occurs. sent12: the ban occurs if the transculturalness occurs. sent13: the transculturalness happens if the fact that the beaming does not occur or the adenocarcinomatousness occurs or both is incorrect. sent14: if the roofing Shreveport happens the packableness occurs. sent15: the effacing Callirhoe happens if that the roofing Shreveport does not occur and the effacing Callirhoe does not occur does not hold. sent16: that that the roofing Shreveport does not occur and the effacing Callirhoe does not occur is not correct is true if the transculturalness does not occur. sent17: the fact that the jellifying happens is right. sent18: that the effacing advancer happens hold. sent19: the palatableness does not occur. sent20: if that the banning happens is not false the tinning galoot occurs. sent21: the adenocarcinomatousness occurs. sent22: the drinking happens. sent23: the fact that the beam does not occur or the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur or both does not hold if the roofing Shreveport does not occur. sent24: the chorusing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the roofing Shreveport does not occur is correct.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: that the beaming does not occur and/or the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur does not hold.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the transculturalness occurs.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the banning occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the banning does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the roofing Shreveport occurs.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the packableness occurs.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the tinning galoot happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__