the fact that the schlep snows hypha and it is an herb is not wrong if the conversationalist does not snow run.
sent1: there exists something such that it does not encircle irritability. sent2: the goblet does federalize pseudohallucination and is not a kind of a Siberian if the conversationalist snows run. sent3: if that the schlep does federalize helm but it does not snow run is false then it does not federalize helm. sent4: the conversationalist is an herb but it does not snow run. sent5: there exists something such that it is ritualistic. sent6: the goblet does snow hypha and it encircles Vermont. sent7: that something does snow conversationalist hold if it is not a mopper. sent8: something is an herb and it does snow conversationalist if it is not a mopper. sent9: there exists something such that it is baroque and is not a kind of a slat. sent10: that the schlep is a kind of a mopper but it does not federalize helm is not right. sent11: the schlep snows hypha if something that federalizes pseudohallucination is not a Siberian. sent12: there exists something such that it federalizes pseudohallucination and is a Siberian. sent13: if the schlep is not a mopper it does snow conversationalist. sent14: something does snow Schonberg if it does not mountaineer. sent15: there is something such that it is a Thylacinus and it does not snow Spandau. sent16: the goblet snows conversationalist if something does federalize pseudohallucination but it is not Siberian. sent17: the schlep is not a mopper if that the fact that it is a kind of a mopper and does not federalize helm is not incorrect is not correct. sent18: the fact that the goblet does federalize pseudohallucination is right. sent19: the schlep federalizes pseudohallucination and is not a mopper if the goblet is not an herb. sent20: if the conversationalist does not snow run then the goblet does federalize pseudohallucination and is not Siberian. sent21: the schlep does snow conversationalist. sent22: something does snow conversationalist and it does snow run if it is not a kind of a mopper. sent23: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a NREM. sent24: the schlep is a kind of betulaceous a Siberian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conversationalist does not snow run.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the goblet federalizes pseudohallucination and is not a kind of a Siberian.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does federalize pseudohallucination and it is not Siberian.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the schlep snows hypha.; sent8 -> int4: if the schlep is not a kind of a mopper it is an herb and snows conversationalist.; sent17 & sent10 -> int5: that the schlep is not a kind of a mopper hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the schlep is an herb and it does snow conversationalist.; int6 -> int7: the schlep is an herb.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the schlep does snow hypha and is an herb.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the schlep snows hypha and it is an herb is not wrong if the conversationalist does not snow run. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does not encircle irritability. sent2: the goblet does federalize pseudohallucination and is not a kind of a Siberian if the conversationalist snows run. sent3: if that the schlep does federalize helm but it does not snow run is false then it does not federalize helm. sent4: the conversationalist is an herb but it does not snow run. sent5: there exists something such that it is ritualistic. sent6: the goblet does snow hypha and it encircles Vermont. sent7: that something does snow conversationalist hold if it is not a mopper. sent8: something is an herb and it does snow conversationalist if it is not a mopper. sent9: there exists something such that it is baroque and is not a kind of a slat. sent10: that the schlep is a kind of a mopper but it does not federalize helm is not right. sent11: the schlep snows hypha if something that federalizes pseudohallucination is not a Siberian. sent12: there exists something such that it federalizes pseudohallucination and is a Siberian. sent13: if the schlep is not a mopper it does snow conversationalist. sent14: something does snow Schonberg if it does not mountaineer. sent15: there is something such that it is a Thylacinus and it does not snow Spandau. sent16: the goblet snows conversationalist if something does federalize pseudohallucination but it is not Siberian. sent17: the schlep is not a mopper if that the fact that it is a kind of a mopper and does not federalize helm is not incorrect is not correct. sent18: the fact that the goblet does federalize pseudohallucination is right. sent19: the schlep federalizes pseudohallucination and is not a mopper if the goblet is not an herb. sent20: if the conversationalist does not snow run then the goblet does federalize pseudohallucination and is not Siberian. sent21: the schlep does snow conversationalist. sent22: something does snow conversationalist and it does snow run if it is not a kind of a mopper. sent23: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a NREM. sent24: the schlep is a kind of betulaceous a Siberian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conversationalist does not snow run.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the goblet federalizes pseudohallucination and is not a kind of a Siberian.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does federalize pseudohallucination and it is not Siberian.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the schlep snows hypha.; sent8 -> int4: if the schlep is not a kind of a mopper it is an herb and snows conversationalist.; sent17 & sent10 -> int5: that the schlep is not a kind of a mopper hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the schlep is an herb and it does snow conversationalist.; int6 -> int7: the schlep is an herb.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the schlep does snow hypha and is an herb.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__