that the bract does not heel vitalism is not incorrect.
sent1: the bailiff is a Orono and is not commutable. sent2: if the inclemency heels cookie then the Malthusian is Procrustean. sent3: if something that is a kind of a Orono does not heel treasurership the inclemency heels cookie. sent4: the bailiff is a Orono. sent5: the Superior is a lwei and/or not commutable if it is not on-site. sent6: there is something such that it is a Orono. sent7: the Superior is not on-site. sent8: if the bailiff is not on-site then it is a Orono and/or is not Procrustean. sent9: the permeation is not Procrustean if the fact that the Malthusian is not Procrustean is right. sent10: if that something does not heel treasurership and is categoric is not correct then it does not heel vitalism. sent11: that something heels cookie but it is not Procrustean is wrong if it is commutable. sent12: the fact that the Malthusian is not non-Procrustean and not commutable is false. sent13: the Malthusian is commutable if that the Superior is commutable is incorrect. sent14: if there is something such that it is a Athapaskan the bailiff is not a lwei. sent15: the Malthusian is not commutable if the Superior is not commutable. sent16: that there exists something such that it does not heel treasurership is true. sent17: if the bract does not heel vitalism then the permeation is categoric. sent18: if something does not heel cookie it is not a kind of a Orono. sent19: there exists something such that it is a Athapaskan. sent20: the inclemency is a Orono and/or it does not heel cookie. sent21: the bailiff is a Orono if the permeation is categoric. sent22: something is a Orono if it does heel cookie. sent23: if that something is not on-site and not commutable does not hold then it is commutable. sent24: if the Superior is a lwei the Malthusian is not commutable. sent25: the bailiff is a kind of a Orono that does not heel treasurership if the permeation is categoric. sent26: the permeation does not heel cookie if the fact that the bailiff does heel cookie but it is not Procrustean is incorrect. sent27: there exists something such that it is a Orono and heels treasurership. sent28: the bract is commutable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bract does not heel vitalism.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the permeation is categoric.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the bailiff is a kind of a Orono and does not heel treasurership.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a Orono and it does not heel treasurership.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the inclemency does heel cookie.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the Malthusian is Procrustean.; sent5 & sent7 -> int6: either the Superior is a kind of a lwei or it is not commutable or both.; int6 & sent24 & sent15 -> int7: the Malthusian is not commutable.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the Malthusian is Procrustean and is not commutable.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the bract does not heel vitalism.
sent22 -> int10: if the bailiff heels cookie that it is a Orono is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the bract does not heel vitalism is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the bailiff is a Orono and is not commutable. sent2: if the inclemency heels cookie then the Malthusian is Procrustean. sent3: if something that is a kind of a Orono does not heel treasurership the inclemency heels cookie. sent4: the bailiff is a Orono. sent5: the Superior is a lwei and/or not commutable if it is not on-site. sent6: there is something such that it is a Orono. sent7: the Superior is not on-site. sent8: if the bailiff is not on-site then it is a Orono and/or is not Procrustean. sent9: the permeation is not Procrustean if the fact that the Malthusian is not Procrustean is right. sent10: if that something does not heel treasurership and is categoric is not correct then it does not heel vitalism. sent11: that something heels cookie but it is not Procrustean is wrong if it is commutable. sent12: the fact that the Malthusian is not non-Procrustean and not commutable is false. sent13: the Malthusian is commutable if that the Superior is commutable is incorrect. sent14: if there is something such that it is a Athapaskan the bailiff is not a lwei. sent15: the Malthusian is not commutable if the Superior is not commutable. sent16: that there exists something such that it does not heel treasurership is true. sent17: if the bract does not heel vitalism then the permeation is categoric. sent18: if something does not heel cookie it is not a kind of a Orono. sent19: there exists something such that it is a Athapaskan. sent20: the inclemency is a Orono and/or it does not heel cookie. sent21: the bailiff is a Orono if the permeation is categoric. sent22: something is a Orono if it does heel cookie. sent23: if that something is not on-site and not commutable does not hold then it is commutable. sent24: if the Superior is a lwei the Malthusian is not commutable. sent25: the bailiff is a kind of a Orono that does not heel treasurership if the permeation is categoric. sent26: the permeation does not heel cookie if the fact that the bailiff does heel cookie but it is not Procrustean is incorrect. sent27: there exists something such that it is a Orono and heels treasurership. sent28: the bract is commutable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bract does not heel vitalism.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the permeation is categoric.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the bailiff is a kind of a Orono and does not heel treasurership.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a Orono and it does not heel treasurership.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the inclemency does heel cookie.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the Malthusian is Procrustean.; sent5 & sent7 -> int6: either the Superior is a kind of a lwei or it is not commutable or both.; int6 & sent24 & sent15 -> int7: the Malthusian is not commutable.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the Malthusian is Procrustean and is not commutable.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__