that the epithelialness does not occur and the dawn does not occur is false.
sent1: if that the denaturalizing mason does not occur but the malfeasance occurs is incorrect then the parodying strain does not occur. sent2: the dawn does not occur. sent3: the epithelialness does not occur if that the mininess does not occur and/or the swatter does not occur is wrong. sent4: the denaturalizing mason happens. sent5: if the mininess does not occur then the fact that not the denaturalizing mason but the malfeasance occurs is incorrect. sent6: the denaturalizing mason does not occur if the lathering subtraction does not occur. sent7: that the epithelialness happens and the dawn happens is caused by that the propulsion does not occur. sent8: the fact that either the mininess does not occur or the swatter does not occur or both is not true if the malfeasance occurs. sent9: that the lathering subtraction does not occur and the lot does not occur is triggered by that the malfeasance does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malfeasance does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the lathering subtraction does not occur and the lotting does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the lathering subtraction does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the denaturalizing mason does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the malfeasance happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that that the mininess does not occur and/or the swattering does not occur is incorrect hold.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: that the epithelialness does not occur is right.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the parodying strain does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the epithelialness does not occur and the dawn does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the denaturalizing mason does not occur but the malfeasance occurs is incorrect then the parodying strain does not occur. sent2: the dawn does not occur. sent3: the epithelialness does not occur if that the mininess does not occur and/or the swatter does not occur is wrong. sent4: the denaturalizing mason happens. sent5: if the mininess does not occur then the fact that not the denaturalizing mason but the malfeasance occurs is incorrect. sent6: the denaturalizing mason does not occur if the lathering subtraction does not occur. sent7: that the epithelialness happens and the dawn happens is caused by that the propulsion does not occur. sent8: the fact that either the mininess does not occur or the swatter does not occur or both is not true if the malfeasance occurs. sent9: that the lathering subtraction does not occur and the lot does not occur is triggered by that the malfeasance does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malfeasance does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the lathering subtraction does not occur and the lotting does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the lathering subtraction does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the denaturalizing mason does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the malfeasance happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that that the mininess does not occur and/or the swattering does not occur is incorrect hold.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: that the epithelialness does not occur is right.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__