the sceneshifter does scout insecurity and scouts hypoxia.
sent1: the cockloft stables. sent2: the sceneshifter is unenforceable and it is Bantoid. sent3: the fact that the sceneshifter is not derivational and does not predate sandiness is not true if there is something such that it does predate pedant. sent4: the sceneshifter is not a landgrave. sent5: the saurel does not scout sceneshifter but it is aniseikonic. sent6: there exists something such that that it predates cockloft and it is not topographical does not hold. sent7: if something predates pedant that the sceneshifter is derivational and does not predate sandiness does not hold. sent8: the cresol does not scout hypoxia if the prosecutor does not scout hypoxia and does not blackmail tetri. sent9: the prosecutor does not blackmail tetri if there exists something such that it does not scout sceneshifter and it is aniseikonic. sent10: the fact that something does scout insecurity and scouts hypoxia is wrong if the fact that it does not predate pedant hold. sent11: if the fact that something is not derivational and it does not predate sandiness is not true it does scout insecurity. sent12: if there is something such that that it predates cockloft and is not topographical does not hold then the prosecutor does not scout hypoxia. sent13: that the sceneshifter is derivational but it does not predate sandiness is wrong. sent14: the spongioblast does scout insecurity if the pedant is a landgrave and does not scout insecurity. sent15: the fact that something is stabling is not false if that it is not a landgrave and it does not scout insecurity does not hold. sent16: there is something such that it does predate pedant. sent17: the fact that the aminophylline does not scout insecurity and is not cervical is not right. sent18: if something is derivational it does stable. sent19: if there is something such that it predates pedant the fact that the sceneshifter is not derivational but it predates sandiness is not correct. sent20: the pedant is a kind of a landgrave that does not scout insecurity if the cresol does not scout hypoxia. sent21: if the sceneshifter does not predate pedant or is stabling or both then the squama is a kind of a stabling.
sent16 & sent3 -> int1: that the sceneshifter is not derivational and does not predate sandiness does not hold.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that if the fact that the sceneshifter is not derivational and it does not predate sandiness is not right then the sceneshifter scouts insecurity is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sceneshifter does scout insecurity.;
the fact that the sceneshifter scouts insecurity and it does scout hypoxia is not right.
sent10 -> int4: if the sceneshifter does not predate pedant then the fact that it scouts insecurity and it does scout hypoxia does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the sceneshifter does scout insecurity and scouts hypoxia. ; $context$ = sent1: the cockloft stables. sent2: the sceneshifter is unenforceable and it is Bantoid. sent3: the fact that the sceneshifter is not derivational and does not predate sandiness is not true if there is something such that it does predate pedant. sent4: the sceneshifter is not a landgrave. sent5: the saurel does not scout sceneshifter but it is aniseikonic. sent6: there exists something such that that it predates cockloft and it is not topographical does not hold. sent7: if something predates pedant that the sceneshifter is derivational and does not predate sandiness does not hold. sent8: the cresol does not scout hypoxia if the prosecutor does not scout hypoxia and does not blackmail tetri. sent9: the prosecutor does not blackmail tetri if there exists something such that it does not scout sceneshifter and it is aniseikonic. sent10: the fact that something does scout insecurity and scouts hypoxia is wrong if the fact that it does not predate pedant hold. sent11: if the fact that something is not derivational and it does not predate sandiness is not true it does scout insecurity. sent12: if there is something such that that it predates cockloft and is not topographical does not hold then the prosecutor does not scout hypoxia. sent13: that the sceneshifter is derivational but it does not predate sandiness is wrong. sent14: the spongioblast does scout insecurity if the pedant is a landgrave and does not scout insecurity. sent15: the fact that something is stabling is not false if that it is not a landgrave and it does not scout insecurity does not hold. sent16: there is something such that it does predate pedant. sent17: the fact that the aminophylline does not scout insecurity and is not cervical is not right. sent18: if something is derivational it does stable. sent19: if there is something such that it predates pedant the fact that the sceneshifter is not derivational but it predates sandiness is not correct. sent20: the pedant is a kind of a landgrave that does not scout insecurity if the cresol does not scout hypoxia. sent21: if the sceneshifter does not predate pedant or is stabling or both then the squama is a kind of a stabling. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent3 -> int1: that the sceneshifter is not derivational and does not predate sandiness does not hold.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that if the fact that the sceneshifter is not derivational and it does not predate sandiness is not right then the sceneshifter scouts insecurity is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sceneshifter does scout insecurity.; __UNKNOWN__