there is something such that if that it is an austral or is not a kind of a Corvidae or both does not hold it does repine Tobey.
sent1: there is something such that if it either is a kind of a frequency or is not Jain or both then it does singularize urgency. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is diamagnetic or it does repine buttock or both is wrong then it applies. sent3: the linendraper does repine Tobey if it is leaning and/or does not repine inventor. sent4: the linendraper repines Tobey if the fact that it is an austral or it is a kind of a Corvidae or both does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a pictorial and/or it abuses is not true then it does singularize pyrrhuloxia. sent6: there exists something such that if it is an austral and/or is not a kind of a Corvidae it repines Tobey. sent7: the fundus is a Corvidae if the fact that it singularizes caput and/or it is a kind of a fix is false. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is an injury or is not leaning or both is not true it repines whacker. sent9: if that the linendraper either is a kind of a frequency or is phonemic or both is false it is a kind of an austral. sent10: if either the linendraper repines Tobey or it does not repine wheatfield or both that it is not inextricable is not wrong. sent11: if the fact that the linendraper is bimillenial or it does not repine Tobey or both is not true then it does answer advection. sent12: the pamperer is ophthalmic if that it is a Corvidae or does not repine Aden or both is false. sent13: the linendraper does repine Tobey if it is an austral and/or it is not a Corvidae. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of an austral or is a Corvidae or both does not hold then it does repine Tobey. sent15: there is something such that if it repines linendraper or does not singularize caput or both it is a Vireonidae. sent16: the fact that something repines Mitchell is not wrong if that either it is a kind of a scrawniness or it is not parotid or both does not hold. sent17: if the fact that the linendraper is an austral and/or is not a Corvidae is false then it repines Tobey. sent18: the fact that the fact that the advection repines Tobey is correct if either the advection is servomechanical or it is not ripe or both is not incorrect.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is a scrawniness or it is not parotid or both is not true it does repine Mitchell.
sent16 -> int1: if the fact that the salver is either a scrawniness or not parotid or both is not correct it repines Mitchell.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is an austral or is not a kind of a Corvidae or both does not hold it does repine Tobey. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it either is a kind of a frequency or is not Jain or both then it does singularize urgency. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is diamagnetic or it does repine buttock or both is wrong then it applies. sent3: the linendraper does repine Tobey if it is leaning and/or does not repine inventor. sent4: the linendraper repines Tobey if the fact that it is an austral or it is a kind of a Corvidae or both does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a pictorial and/or it abuses is not true then it does singularize pyrrhuloxia. sent6: there exists something such that if it is an austral and/or is not a kind of a Corvidae it repines Tobey. sent7: the fundus is a Corvidae if the fact that it singularizes caput and/or it is a kind of a fix is false. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is an injury or is not leaning or both is not true it repines whacker. sent9: if that the linendraper either is a kind of a frequency or is phonemic or both is false it is a kind of an austral. sent10: if either the linendraper repines Tobey or it does not repine wheatfield or both that it is not inextricable is not wrong. sent11: if the fact that the linendraper is bimillenial or it does not repine Tobey or both is not true then it does answer advection. sent12: the pamperer is ophthalmic if that it is a Corvidae or does not repine Aden or both is false. sent13: the linendraper does repine Tobey if it is an austral and/or it is not a Corvidae. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of an austral or is a Corvidae or both does not hold then it does repine Tobey. sent15: there is something such that if it repines linendraper or does not singularize caput or both it is a Vireonidae. sent16: the fact that something repines Mitchell is not wrong if that either it is a kind of a scrawniness or it is not parotid or both does not hold. sent17: if the fact that the linendraper is an austral and/or is not a Corvidae is false then it repines Tobey. sent18: the fact that the fact that the advection repines Tobey is correct if either the advection is servomechanical or it is not ripe or both is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__