the Calla is not paniculate.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is memberless thing that is not a stipendiary does not hold. sent2: something is falconine or is attentional or both if that it is not paniculate is not incorrect. sent3: if something is thinkable and it is not non-attentional then it is not paniculate. sent4: if the beach is not a co-option then it is not vestmental. sent5: the mealybug is vestmental if that the reagent is a Mercury hold. sent6: that the fact that the beach is a co-option is not wrong is not right. sent7: the beach is not vestmental. sent8: if there exists something such that either it is falconine or it is attentional or both then the slide is vestmental. sent9: the reagent is not paniculate if there is something such that that either it is a co-option or it is not angiocarpic or both is wrong. sent10: the mealybug is a stipendiary if there exists something such that that it is a kind of memberless thing that is not a stipendiary is wrong. sent11: the fact that something is a co-option or it is not angiocarpic or both is not correct if it is stipendiary. sent12: the fact that the slide is filarial and it is a Dimocarpus does not hold. sent13: if the slide is a Dimocarpus the reagent is a Mercury. sent14: if the Calla is not thinkable the fact that the slide is filarial but it is not a Dimocarpus does not hold. sent15: if the Calla is unthinkable then that the slide is filarial and it is a Dimocarpus does not hold. sent16: the Calla is angiocarpic. sent17: the fact that the paving is unthinkable and/or it services bibliolatry is not correct if the Calla is not a kind of a Mercury. sent18: if the mealybug is vestmental the beach is non-falconine and/or it is vestmental. sent19: if that the slide is not non-filarial but it is not a Dimocarpus is not true the reagent is a Mercury. sent20: the bird is a co-option. sent21: if the beach is not a co-option then that it is not falconine or it is vestmental or both is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Calla is not thinkable.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the slide is filarial and is not a Dimocarpus is incorrect.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the reagent is a Mercury.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the mealybug is vestmental.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the beach is not falconine and/or it is vestmental.; sent21 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the beach is not falconine or it is vestmental or both is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Calla is thinkable.; sent3 -> int8: if the Calla is thinkable and it is attentional then it is not paniculate.;
that either the paving is not thinkable or it services bibliolatry or both is incorrect.
sent2 -> int9: if the reagent is not paniculate then it is falconine and/or attentional.; sent11 -> int10: the fact that either the mealybug is a kind of a co-option or it is not angiocarpic or both does not hold if it is a kind of a stipendiary.; sent1 & sent10 -> int11: the mealybug is a kind of a stipendiary.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the mealybug is a co-option or it is not angiocarpic or both is wrong.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a co-option or it is not angiocarpic or both is not true.; int13 & sent9 -> int14: the reagent is not paniculate.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the reagent is falconine or it is attentional or both.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that that it is not non-falconine or attentional or both is not false.; int16 & sent8 -> int17: the slide is vestmental.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is vestmental.;
$hypothesis$ = the Calla is not paniculate. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is memberless thing that is not a stipendiary does not hold. sent2: something is falconine or is attentional or both if that it is not paniculate is not incorrect. sent3: if something is thinkable and it is not non-attentional then it is not paniculate. sent4: if the beach is not a co-option then it is not vestmental. sent5: the mealybug is vestmental if that the reagent is a Mercury hold. sent6: that the fact that the beach is a co-option is not wrong is not right. sent7: the beach is not vestmental. sent8: if there exists something such that either it is falconine or it is attentional or both then the slide is vestmental. sent9: the reagent is not paniculate if there is something such that that either it is a co-option or it is not angiocarpic or both is wrong. sent10: the mealybug is a stipendiary if there exists something such that that it is a kind of memberless thing that is not a stipendiary is wrong. sent11: the fact that something is a co-option or it is not angiocarpic or both is not correct if it is stipendiary. sent12: the fact that the slide is filarial and it is a Dimocarpus does not hold. sent13: if the slide is a Dimocarpus the reagent is a Mercury. sent14: if the Calla is not thinkable the fact that the slide is filarial but it is not a Dimocarpus does not hold. sent15: if the Calla is unthinkable then that the slide is filarial and it is a Dimocarpus does not hold. sent16: the Calla is angiocarpic. sent17: the fact that the paving is unthinkable and/or it services bibliolatry is not correct if the Calla is not a kind of a Mercury. sent18: if the mealybug is vestmental the beach is non-falconine and/or it is vestmental. sent19: if that the slide is not non-filarial but it is not a Dimocarpus is not true the reagent is a Mercury. sent20: the bird is a co-option. sent21: if the beach is not a co-option then that it is not falconine or it is vestmental or both is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Calla is not thinkable.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the slide is filarial and is not a Dimocarpus is incorrect.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the reagent is a Mercury.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the mealybug is vestmental.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the beach is not falconine and/or it is vestmental.; sent21 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the beach is not falconine or it is vestmental or both is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Calla is thinkable.; sent3 -> int8: if the Calla is thinkable and it is attentional then it is not paniculate.; __UNKNOWN__