the cucumber does not furrow and/or it is a miscue.
sent1: the ouster is not a Sappho. sent2: if that the ouster is not a Sappho and does not peruse is not true then the lanternfish is new. sent3: the ouster is not a kind of a marblewood. sent4: the lanternfish is a kind of a miscue. sent5: if the bauxite is not a miscue and it is not new then the lanternfish is not a furrowed. sent6: the fact that something does not strengthen moneyed and is not new is wrong if it is a marblewood. sent7: the ouster consternates Piper and/or does peruse. sent8: if the ouster is a kind of a Sappho the lanternfish is new. sent9: that the ouster is a Sappho and does not peruse is not right. sent10: the lanternfish strengthens moneyed. sent11: the cucumber is a kind of a furrowed and/or it is a miscue. sent12: the cucumber does not strengthen moneyed. sent13: the lanternfish is not new. sent14: the colonel is not a Sappho. sent15: the bauxite is a kind of a marblewood. sent16: the cucumber either is not a furrowed or is a kind of a miscue or both if that the bauxite is a furrowed is correct. sent17: the ouster is not a furrowed and is not a Sappho. sent18: if the fact that the bauxite is a furrowed hold then the cucumber is a furrowed or a miscue or both. sent19: if the ouster is not a Sappho and it does not peruse then the colonel does not consternate Piper. sent20: if the bauxite does not strengthen moneyed but it is a marblewood then it is a kind of a furrowed. sent21: if something does not strengthen moneyed and is not new then it does not consternate Piper. sent22: if something does not consternate Piper then the fact that it is not a furrowed or it is a miscue or both does not hold. sent23: if the ouster is a Sappho and does not peruse then the colonel does not consternate Piper. sent24: the bauxite does not consternate Piper if the colonel is a furrowed but not a marblewood.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ouster is not a kind of a Sappho and does not peruse does not hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the lanternfish is new.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the ouster is not a Sappho and it does not peruse.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the colonel does not consternate Piper.;
the fact that the cucumber does not furrow and/or is a kind of a miscue is wrong.
sent22 -> int5: if the cucumber does not consternate Piper the fact that it is not a kind of a furrowed and/or it is a miscue is false.; sent21 -> int6: the cucumber does not consternate Piper if it does not strengthen moneyed and it is not new.;
$hypothesis$ = the cucumber does not furrow and/or it is a miscue. ; $context$ = sent1: the ouster is not a Sappho. sent2: if that the ouster is not a Sappho and does not peruse is not true then the lanternfish is new. sent3: the ouster is not a kind of a marblewood. sent4: the lanternfish is a kind of a miscue. sent5: if the bauxite is not a miscue and it is not new then the lanternfish is not a furrowed. sent6: the fact that something does not strengthen moneyed and is not new is wrong if it is a marblewood. sent7: the ouster consternates Piper and/or does peruse. sent8: if the ouster is a kind of a Sappho the lanternfish is new. sent9: that the ouster is a Sappho and does not peruse is not right. sent10: the lanternfish strengthens moneyed. sent11: the cucumber is a kind of a furrowed and/or it is a miscue. sent12: the cucumber does not strengthen moneyed. sent13: the lanternfish is not new. sent14: the colonel is not a Sappho. sent15: the bauxite is a kind of a marblewood. sent16: the cucumber either is not a furrowed or is a kind of a miscue or both if that the bauxite is a furrowed is correct. sent17: the ouster is not a furrowed and is not a Sappho. sent18: if the fact that the bauxite is a furrowed hold then the cucumber is a furrowed or a miscue or both. sent19: if the ouster is not a Sappho and it does not peruse then the colonel does not consternate Piper. sent20: if the bauxite does not strengthen moneyed but it is a marblewood then it is a kind of a furrowed. sent21: if something does not strengthen moneyed and is not new then it does not consternate Piper. sent22: if something does not consternate Piper then the fact that it is not a furrowed or it is a miscue or both does not hold. sent23: if the ouster is a Sappho and does not peruse then the colonel does not consternate Piper. sent24: the bauxite does not consternate Piper if the colonel is a furrowed but not a marblewood. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ouster is not a kind of a Sappho and does not peruse does not hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the lanternfish is new.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the ouster is not a Sappho and it does not peruse.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the colonel does not consternate Piper.; __UNKNOWN__