the fact that that there exists something such that if it is a perennial the fact that it is a stainless and it is not geophysical does not hold hold is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it empties excavation that it does cuddle and is not glottochronological is not correct. sent2: if the Catholic is a kind of a strained it does simplify and it is not a kind of a sixth. sent3: if that the Catholic is perennial is not incorrect the fact that it is a kind of a stainless and is geophysical is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a perennial it is a kind of a stainless and is not geophysical. sent5: there is something such that if it sniffs phial that it is a printer that does not simplify is not true. sent6: the Catholic is a carboxyl but it is not a stainless if it is a kind of a pan. sent7: the fact that something is a carob but it is not a pregnanediol does not hold if it is confrontational. sent8: if something is a Algonkian the fact that it is a push-bike and not incorrupt is incorrect. sent9: if the Catholic is perennial that it is a stainless and it is not geophysical is not correct. sent10: there is something such that if it is not uncooperative then that it does consolidate Breuer and is not a fire-bush is incorrect. sent11: if the Catholic is a kind of a perennial then it is a stainless and it is not geophysical. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a session the fact that it is a hammock and does sniff nephrotomy is wrong. sent13: if the fact that the glass is geophysical hold the fact that it sniffs glass and it does consolidate colonoscopy is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a happiness then that it is annalistic and is audio-lingual is not right. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it consolidates ossuary is not wrong that it is a kind of a Hungarian and it is not a Smith does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the Catholic does rotate hold then the fact that it is a kind of geophysical thing that is not humic does not hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it does scout perennial it is a kind of subhuman thing that does not simplify. sent18: if the Catholic is a perennial then the fact that it does empty zapper and does not consolidate jacklight is not correct. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of a perennial the fact that the fact that it is a stainless and it is geophysical is not incorrect is not true. sent20: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a classical that it is a chance that does not scout vagrancy is incorrect is true. sent21: if the Catholic is a kind of a printer the fact that it is litigious and is not a grouseberry does not hold.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a Algonkian the fact that it is a push-bike but not incorrupt is not right.
sent8 -> int1: if the jacklight is a Algonkian that it is both a push-bike and not incorrupt is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that there exists something such that if it is a perennial the fact that it is a stainless and it is not geophysical does not hold hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it empties excavation that it does cuddle and is not glottochronological is not correct. sent2: if the Catholic is a kind of a strained it does simplify and it is not a kind of a sixth. sent3: if that the Catholic is perennial is not incorrect the fact that it is a kind of a stainless and is geophysical is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a perennial it is a kind of a stainless and is not geophysical. sent5: there is something such that if it sniffs phial that it is a printer that does not simplify is not true. sent6: the Catholic is a carboxyl but it is not a stainless if it is a kind of a pan. sent7: the fact that something is a carob but it is not a pregnanediol does not hold if it is confrontational. sent8: if something is a Algonkian the fact that it is a push-bike and not incorrupt is incorrect. sent9: if the Catholic is perennial that it is a stainless and it is not geophysical is not correct. sent10: there is something such that if it is not uncooperative then that it does consolidate Breuer and is not a fire-bush is incorrect. sent11: if the Catholic is a kind of a perennial then it is a stainless and it is not geophysical. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a session the fact that it is a hammock and does sniff nephrotomy is wrong. sent13: if the fact that the glass is geophysical hold the fact that it sniffs glass and it does consolidate colonoscopy is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a happiness then that it is annalistic and is audio-lingual is not right. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it consolidates ossuary is not wrong that it is a kind of a Hungarian and it is not a Smith does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the Catholic does rotate hold then the fact that it is a kind of geophysical thing that is not humic does not hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it does scout perennial it is a kind of subhuman thing that does not simplify. sent18: if the Catholic is a perennial then the fact that it does empty zapper and does not consolidate jacklight is not correct. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of a perennial the fact that the fact that it is a stainless and it is geophysical is not incorrect is not true. sent20: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a classical that it is a chance that does not scout vagrancy is incorrect is true. sent21: if the Catholic is a kind of a printer the fact that it is litigious and is not a grouseberry does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__