the Stoic is a kind of a nonacceptance but it does not crook lipogram.
sent1: if the gallbladder does not clank agnosia it does crook lipogram and it is not a nonacceptance. sent2: if the Stoic is both haemophilic and mastoid the fact that the gallbladder does not clank agnosia is right. sent3: the simulacrum crooks lipogram. sent4: the fact that the gallbladder does crook empiricism is not incorrect. sent5: the gallbladder is tractive. sent6: the Stoic slouches. sent7: the gallbladder is not non-haemophilic. sent8: if the Stoic does not crook empiricism it is a nonacceptance and it does not crook lipogram. sent9: something does not clank agnosia if it is a Madagascan that is tractive. sent10: if the Stoic is not a nonacceptance then it is both not non-haemophilic and not tractive. sent11: the Stoic is a nonacceptance but it is not tractive. sent12: if the gallbladder does not clank agnosia it is a kind of a mastoid. sent13: the gallbladder is a mastoid if it does not crook empiricism. sent14: the gallbladder is not haemophilic if the Stoic is a kind of mastoid thing that crooks lipogram. sent15: the Stoic is a nonacceptance if it does not crook empiricism. sent16: the Stoic is a nonacceptance. sent17: the monomaniac is a kind of a down that is a mastoid. sent18: the Stoic is not a mastoid if the gallbladder clanks agnosia and crooks empiricism. sent19: the Stoic is anoperineal if that it is not a kind of a muezzin is not false. sent20: if the biographer does clank agnosia it is mastoid. sent21: the Stoic is nonproprietary but not a muezzin. sent22: the gallbladder is not non-Madagascan. sent23: if something balls and ammoniates fatigability it does not circularize. sent24: the gallbladder is mutagenic. sent25: the Stoic is a nonacceptance that is haemophilic.
sent9 -> int1: if the gallbladder is both a Madagascan and tractive then it does not clank agnosia.; sent22 & sent5 -> int2: the gallbladder is a kind of Madagascan thing that is tractive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gallbladder does not clank agnosia.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the gallbladder is not non-mastoid hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the gallbladder is haemophilic and is a mastoid.;
that the fact that the Stoic is a kind of a nonacceptance but it does not crook lipogram is not incorrect is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the Stoic is a kind of a nonacceptance but it does not crook lipogram. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gallbladder does not clank agnosia it does crook lipogram and it is not a nonacceptance. sent2: if the Stoic is both haemophilic and mastoid the fact that the gallbladder does not clank agnosia is right. sent3: the simulacrum crooks lipogram. sent4: the fact that the gallbladder does crook empiricism is not incorrect. sent5: the gallbladder is tractive. sent6: the Stoic slouches. sent7: the gallbladder is not non-haemophilic. sent8: if the Stoic does not crook empiricism it is a nonacceptance and it does not crook lipogram. sent9: something does not clank agnosia if it is a Madagascan that is tractive. sent10: if the Stoic is not a nonacceptance then it is both not non-haemophilic and not tractive. sent11: the Stoic is a nonacceptance but it is not tractive. sent12: if the gallbladder does not clank agnosia it is a kind of a mastoid. sent13: the gallbladder is a mastoid if it does not crook empiricism. sent14: the gallbladder is not haemophilic if the Stoic is a kind of mastoid thing that crooks lipogram. sent15: the Stoic is a nonacceptance if it does not crook empiricism. sent16: the Stoic is a nonacceptance. sent17: the monomaniac is a kind of a down that is a mastoid. sent18: the Stoic is not a mastoid if the gallbladder clanks agnosia and crooks empiricism. sent19: the Stoic is anoperineal if that it is not a kind of a muezzin is not false. sent20: if the biographer does clank agnosia it is mastoid. sent21: the Stoic is nonproprietary but not a muezzin. sent22: the gallbladder is not non-Madagascan. sent23: if something balls and ammoniates fatigability it does not circularize. sent24: the gallbladder is mutagenic. sent25: the Stoic is a nonacceptance that is haemophilic. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the gallbladder is both a Madagascan and tractive then it does not clank agnosia.; sent22 & sent5 -> int2: the gallbladder is a kind of Madagascan thing that is tractive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gallbladder does not clank agnosia.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the gallbladder is not non-mastoid hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the gallbladder is haemophilic and is a mastoid.; __UNKNOWN__