that something disobliges spaceflight and/or it pits affecting is incorrect.
sent1: if the spammer granulates the Hutu does pit affecting. sent2: the whinchat is not a bassarisk if the mugwort does not variegate internationalist. sent3: the spammer does pit affecting if that the world is not a cyan and does not variegate Bushnell does not hold. sent4: if the mugwort is not a kind of a bassarisk then the whinchat does not variegate internationalist. sent5: the world does pit groupie and it is exaugural. sent6: the mugwort is not a bassarisk and/or is not a nankeen. sent7: the Hutu variegates internationalist and does granulate if the whinchat does not variegates internationalist. sent8: the spammer is a bassarisk if the mugwort disobliges spaceflight. sent9: the Hutu is not a bassarisk if the mugwort does not variegate internationalist. sent10: that the spammer does pit affecting and is not a bassarisk is incorrect if the fact that the mugwort does variegate internationalist is right. sent11: the world is a cyan and does pit affecting if the spammer is not a cyan. sent12: if the world is not a nankeen the mugwort is not a cyan. sent13: the whinchat variegates internationalist or it is a bassarisk or both. sent14: if the spammer is not a cyan the world disobliges spaceflight. sent15: the whinchat does not variegate internationalist if the mugwort is not a nankeen. sent16: there exists something such that it pits affecting or it is a kind of a bassarisk or both. sent17: either the Hutu variegates Bushnell or it granulates or both. sent18: if the Hutu is not a kind of a cyan then the world is a kind of a cyan and does variegate internationalist. sent19: the Hutu does granulate if the whinchat does not variegate internationalist. sent20: the mugwort variegates internationalist if that the whinchat is not a nankeen is true. sent21: if the spammer does not variegate internationalist then the Hutu pits affecting. sent22: there exists something such that it is a bassarisk and/or it does variegate Bushnell. sent23: if the spammer does not granulate then the Hutu does not disoblige spaceflight. sent24: if the Hutu does variegate internationalist then the fact that the world is not a cyan and it does not variegate Bushnell does not hold. sent25: the fact that the spammer is a kind of a bassarisk and does not pit affecting is not correct if the mugwort does variegate internationalist.
sent6 & sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the whinchat does not variegate internationalist.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the Hutu variegates internationalist and granulates.; int2 -> int3: the Hutu does variegate internationalist.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: that the world is not a kind of a cyan and does not variegate Bushnell does not hold.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the spammer does pit affecting.; int5 -> int6: that the spammer does disoblige spaceflight and/or pits affecting is right.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that something disobliges spaceflight and/or it pits affecting is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spammer granulates the Hutu does pit affecting. sent2: the whinchat is not a bassarisk if the mugwort does not variegate internationalist. sent3: the spammer does pit affecting if that the world is not a cyan and does not variegate Bushnell does not hold. sent4: if the mugwort is not a kind of a bassarisk then the whinchat does not variegate internationalist. sent5: the world does pit groupie and it is exaugural. sent6: the mugwort is not a bassarisk and/or is not a nankeen. sent7: the Hutu variegates internationalist and does granulate if the whinchat does not variegates internationalist. sent8: the spammer is a bassarisk if the mugwort disobliges spaceflight. sent9: the Hutu is not a bassarisk if the mugwort does not variegate internationalist. sent10: that the spammer does pit affecting and is not a bassarisk is incorrect if the fact that the mugwort does variegate internationalist is right. sent11: the world is a cyan and does pit affecting if the spammer is not a cyan. sent12: if the world is not a nankeen the mugwort is not a cyan. sent13: the whinchat variegates internationalist or it is a bassarisk or both. sent14: if the spammer is not a cyan the world disobliges spaceflight. sent15: the whinchat does not variegate internationalist if the mugwort is not a nankeen. sent16: there exists something such that it pits affecting or it is a kind of a bassarisk or both. sent17: either the Hutu variegates Bushnell or it granulates or both. sent18: if the Hutu is not a kind of a cyan then the world is a kind of a cyan and does variegate internationalist. sent19: the Hutu does granulate if the whinchat does not variegate internationalist. sent20: the mugwort variegates internationalist if that the whinchat is not a nankeen is true. sent21: if the spammer does not variegate internationalist then the Hutu pits affecting. sent22: there exists something such that it is a bassarisk and/or it does variegate Bushnell. sent23: if the spammer does not granulate then the Hutu does not disoblige spaceflight. sent24: if the Hutu does variegate internationalist then the fact that the world is not a cyan and it does not variegate Bushnell does not hold. sent25: the fact that the spammer is a kind of a bassarisk and does not pit affecting is not correct if the mugwort does variegate internationalist. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the whinchat does not variegate internationalist.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the Hutu variegates internationalist and granulates.; int2 -> int3: the Hutu does variegate internationalist.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: that the world is not a kind of a cyan and does not variegate Bushnell does not hold.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the spammer does pit affecting.; int5 -> int6: that the spammer does disoblige spaceflight and/or pits affecting is right.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__