the aphid is both Rousseauan and syncategorematic.
sent1: if something is not a rainmaker and is not an underachiever the antiquary is not Rousseauan. sent2: if the constructivist is non-Rousseauan then it is a rainmaker. sent3: there is something such that that it is not unfree is true. sent4: the aphid does not look varicosity and is not genic if the constructivist is a rainmaker. sent5: there exists something such that it is a brigantine and it is not phosphorous. sent6: if something is not a rainmaker then the fact that it is Rousseauan and it is syncategorematic is not true. sent7: the aphid is not a rainmaker if something that is not unfree is not an underachiever. sent8: there is something such that it is not synaptic and does not interpolate cooked. sent9: the antiquary is not an underachiever. sent10: the antiquary is not unfree and it is not an underachiever. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a skybox and it is not a kind of a mountaineer. sent12: if the sail is not syncategorematic and/or it is Rousseauan then the constructivist is not Rousseauan. sent13: something is not an underachiever. sent14: the aphid is syncategorematic if the constructivist is a kind of a rainmaker but it is not syncategorematic. sent15: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-unfree an underachiever.
sent10 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not unfree and not an underachiever.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the aphid is not a rainmaker.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the aphid is Rousseauan and it is syncategorematic is not right if it is not a rainmaker.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
something does not look varicosity and is not genic.
$hypothesis$ = the aphid is both Rousseauan and syncategorematic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a rainmaker and is not an underachiever the antiquary is not Rousseauan. sent2: if the constructivist is non-Rousseauan then it is a rainmaker. sent3: there is something such that that it is not unfree is true. sent4: the aphid does not look varicosity and is not genic if the constructivist is a rainmaker. sent5: there exists something such that it is a brigantine and it is not phosphorous. sent6: if something is not a rainmaker then the fact that it is Rousseauan and it is syncategorematic is not true. sent7: the aphid is not a rainmaker if something that is not unfree is not an underachiever. sent8: there is something such that it is not synaptic and does not interpolate cooked. sent9: the antiquary is not an underachiever. sent10: the antiquary is not unfree and it is not an underachiever. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a skybox and it is not a kind of a mountaineer. sent12: if the sail is not syncategorematic and/or it is Rousseauan then the constructivist is not Rousseauan. sent13: something is not an underachiever. sent14: the aphid is syncategorematic if the constructivist is a kind of a rainmaker but it is not syncategorematic. sent15: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-unfree an underachiever. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not unfree and not an underachiever.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the aphid is not a rainmaker.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the aphid is Rousseauan and it is syncategorematic is not right if it is not a rainmaker.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__