that the fluorouracil does not abrade is not incorrect.
sent1: the fluorouracil is Palestinian or it is mensural or both. sent2: the APC is not indusial if the pichi is not minors. sent3: the fact that everything is not a kind of a fauvism is not incorrect. sent4: the APC is mensural. sent5: something does not raven if it is not a Nonconformist. sent6: if something is a temporal then it abrades. sent7: the APC jumps fuck but it is not a fauvism. sent8: the pichi is a neuter. sent9: if that something does quieten and it is a Nonconformist is false it is not a Nonconformist. sent10: the pichi is a kind of a fauvism if something is temporal and/or it is indusial. sent11: the APC is not a Moore. sent12: the APC is minors and it is mensural. sent13: there is something such that it either is a falsehood or is ventricular or both. sent14: something is not a kind of a temporal. sent15: the APC is a fauvism and mensural if the dogbane is not a cytokine. sent16: the fact that something is not a cytokine and it is not a Polygala is not true if it is not a raven. sent17: there is something such that it is a kind of an indestructibility and does not wet. sent18: the pichi is a fauvism if there is something such that it is indusial. sent19: if a dhawa is a seek the pichi is not minors. sent20: the dogbane is minors and/or it is a fauvism if it does not abrade. sent21: that the dogbane is not a cytokine if the fact that the yacht is not a cytokine and it is not a kind of a Polygala is not true is not incorrect. sent22: the pitchman is a kind of a dhawa and it is a seek. sent23: the fluorouracil is not a kind of a temporal. sent24: the fluorouracil does not abrade if something that is minors is not temporal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the APC is temporal.; assump1 -> int1: the APC is not non-temporal and/or it is indusial.; int1 -> int2: something is temporal and/or indusial.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the pichi is a fauvism.; sent3 -> int4: the pichi is not a kind of a fauvism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the APC is not a kind of a temporal.; sent12 -> int7: the APC is not non-minors.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the APC is minors but it is not temporal is not wrong.; int8 -> int9: there are minors and non-temporal things.; int9 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the fluorouracil does abrade.
sent6 -> int10: if the fluorouracil is a temporal it does abrade.; sent16 -> int11: that the yacht is not a cytokine and it is not a Polygala is false if it does not raven.; sent5 -> int12: if that the yacht is not a Nonconformist hold it is not a raven.; sent9 -> int13: the yacht is not a Nonconformist if the fact that it quietens and is a Nonconformist is not true.; sent22 -> int14: there is something such that it is a kind of a dhawa that seeks.; int14 & sent19 -> int15: that the pichi is not minors is not incorrect.; sent2 & int15 -> int16: that the APC is not indusial hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fluorouracil does not abrade is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fluorouracil is Palestinian or it is mensural or both. sent2: the APC is not indusial if the pichi is not minors. sent3: the fact that everything is not a kind of a fauvism is not incorrect. sent4: the APC is mensural. sent5: something does not raven if it is not a Nonconformist. sent6: if something is a temporal then it abrades. sent7: the APC jumps fuck but it is not a fauvism. sent8: the pichi is a neuter. sent9: if that something does quieten and it is a Nonconformist is false it is not a Nonconformist. sent10: the pichi is a kind of a fauvism if something is temporal and/or it is indusial. sent11: the APC is not a Moore. sent12: the APC is minors and it is mensural. sent13: there is something such that it either is a falsehood or is ventricular or both. sent14: something is not a kind of a temporal. sent15: the APC is a fauvism and mensural if the dogbane is not a cytokine. sent16: the fact that something is not a cytokine and it is not a Polygala is not true if it is not a raven. sent17: there is something such that it is a kind of an indestructibility and does not wet. sent18: the pichi is a fauvism if there is something such that it is indusial. sent19: if a dhawa is a seek the pichi is not minors. sent20: the dogbane is minors and/or it is a fauvism if it does not abrade. sent21: that the dogbane is not a cytokine if the fact that the yacht is not a cytokine and it is not a kind of a Polygala is not true is not incorrect. sent22: the pitchman is a kind of a dhawa and it is a seek. sent23: the fluorouracil is not a kind of a temporal. sent24: the fluorouracil does not abrade if something that is minors is not temporal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the APC is temporal.; assump1 -> int1: the APC is not non-temporal and/or it is indusial.; int1 -> int2: something is temporal and/or indusial.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the pichi is a fauvism.; sent3 -> int4: the pichi is not a kind of a fauvism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the APC is not a kind of a temporal.; sent12 -> int7: the APC is not non-minors.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the APC is minors but it is not temporal is not wrong.; int8 -> int9: there are minors and non-temporal things.; int9 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__