the influencing happens and the scarring does not occur.
sent1: if that the non-odorousness and the non-packableness happens is not true the fact that the odorousness occurs is right. sent2: the striating does not occur if the fact that both the dealings and the splatting dullness occurs is not right. sent3: that the splatting inventory does not occur and the salvation does not occur is not true if the striateness does not occur. sent4: that the mastership does not occur results in that the squelch happens and the couple happens. sent5: the salvation does not occur. sent6: the splatting inventory does not occur and the splatting vintner does not occur. sent7: the fragmenting genipa occurs if that the statisticalness does not occur is not false. sent8: the mastership does not occur. sent9: that the dealings and the splatting dullness happens is wrong if the packableness does not occur. sent10: the influence but not the scar occurs if the fragmenting genipa occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the packableness does not occur hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the dealings happens and the splatting dullness happens is not correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the striating does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that that the splatting inventory does not occur and the salvation does not occur hold is not true.; sent6 -> int4: the splatting inventory does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the splatting inventory does not occur and the salvation does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the packableness occurs.; sent4 & sent8 -> int8: the squelch and the coupling occurs.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the squelching occurs is not incorrect.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the packableness and the squelch occurs.;
the fact that the odorousness but not the finishing petrology happens hold.
$hypothesis$ = the influencing happens and the scarring does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the non-odorousness and the non-packableness happens is not true the fact that the odorousness occurs is right. sent2: the striating does not occur if the fact that both the dealings and the splatting dullness occurs is not right. sent3: that the splatting inventory does not occur and the salvation does not occur is not true if the striateness does not occur. sent4: that the mastership does not occur results in that the squelch happens and the couple happens. sent5: the salvation does not occur. sent6: the splatting inventory does not occur and the splatting vintner does not occur. sent7: the fragmenting genipa occurs if that the statisticalness does not occur is not false. sent8: the mastership does not occur. sent9: that the dealings and the splatting dullness happens is wrong if the packableness does not occur. sent10: the influence but not the scar occurs if the fragmenting genipa occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the packableness does not occur hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the dealings happens and the splatting dullness happens is not correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the striating does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that that the splatting inventory does not occur and the salvation does not occur hold is not true.; sent6 -> int4: the splatting inventory does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the splatting inventory does not occur and the salvation does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the packableness occurs.; sent4 & sent8 -> int8: the squelch and the coupling occurs.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the squelching occurs is not incorrect.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the packableness and the squelch occurs.; __UNKNOWN__