that there is something such that that it does not exempt balking and does clean Cooperstown is not right does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that it does describe fugleman. sent2: the fugleman is not anthropogenetic if the dimetrodon is unwary thing that does not exempt ease. sent3: something is an exhausted that is a Boann. sent4: if that something is a fidget that is a stepparent is not correct then it does not cremate endarterectomy. sent5: the fact that something is not insecticidal but a Plimsoll is not true if it is not three-dimensional. sent6: the towhead does not clean Cooperstown if it does not cremate stevedore. sent7: there is something such that that it is a kind of psychometric thing that cremates stevedore is not right. sent8: the fugleman is not automotive if that it does exempt ease is false. sent9: that the moneymaker is cytoarchitectural and it is automotive is not correct if there is something such that it is not cytoarchitectural. sent10: that the MAO is not a stereoscope and does clean Cooperstown is false if that it is not criminological hold. sent11: something is not automotive if the fact that the fact that it exempts ease and is unwary is right is incorrect. sent12: that the stevedore does cremate stevedore and it cramps is false. sent13: if something is not anthropogenetic then it is non-cytoarchitectural. sent14: the fugleman is not a infiniteness. sent15: there is something such that it is not anthropogenetic. sent16: the fact that something does not exempt balking if that it does not clean Cooperstown is not incorrect hold. sent17: there is something such that it is anthropogenetic. sent18: that the fugleman is a choker and occipital is not correct. sent19: if something does not exempt ease it is not automotive. sent20: that something does not exempt balking but it does clean Cooperstown is wrong if that it is not automotive is not false. sent21: the fact that the fugleman exempts balking and does clean Cooperstown is false if that it is not automotive is not false. sent22: if that the fugleman variegates and it is a sheikdom is not right it is not a kind of a Auvergne. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not anthropogenetic then the fact that the fugleman exempts ease and it is unwary is not right.
sent15 & sent23 -> int1: the fact that the fugleman does exempt ease and is unwary is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the fugleman exempts ease and it is unwary does not hold it is not automotive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fugleman is not automotive.; sent20 -> int4: the fact that the fugleman does not exempt balking but it does clean Cooperstown does not hold if it is not automotive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the fugleman does not exempt balking and cleans Cooperstown does not hold.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that the moneymaker is cytoarchitectural and it is automotive is not right.
sent13 -> int6: the fugleman is not cytoarchitectural if that it is not anthropogenetic hold.; sent16 -> int7: if the dimetrodon does not clean Cooperstown it does not exempt balking.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that that it does not exempt balking and does clean Cooperstown is not right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does describe fugleman. sent2: the fugleman is not anthropogenetic if the dimetrodon is unwary thing that does not exempt ease. sent3: something is an exhausted that is a Boann. sent4: if that something is a fidget that is a stepparent is not correct then it does not cremate endarterectomy. sent5: the fact that something is not insecticidal but a Plimsoll is not true if it is not three-dimensional. sent6: the towhead does not clean Cooperstown if it does not cremate stevedore. sent7: there is something such that that it is a kind of psychometric thing that cremates stevedore is not right. sent8: the fugleman is not automotive if that it does exempt ease is false. sent9: that the moneymaker is cytoarchitectural and it is automotive is not correct if there is something such that it is not cytoarchitectural. sent10: that the MAO is not a stereoscope and does clean Cooperstown is false if that it is not criminological hold. sent11: something is not automotive if the fact that the fact that it exempts ease and is unwary is right is incorrect. sent12: that the stevedore does cremate stevedore and it cramps is false. sent13: if something is not anthropogenetic then it is non-cytoarchitectural. sent14: the fugleman is not a infiniteness. sent15: there is something such that it is not anthropogenetic. sent16: the fact that something does not exempt balking if that it does not clean Cooperstown is not incorrect hold. sent17: there is something such that it is anthropogenetic. sent18: that the fugleman is a choker and occipital is not correct. sent19: if something does not exempt ease it is not automotive. sent20: that something does not exempt balking but it does clean Cooperstown is wrong if that it is not automotive is not false. sent21: the fact that the fugleman exempts balking and does clean Cooperstown is false if that it is not automotive is not false. sent22: if that the fugleman variegates and it is a sheikdom is not right it is not a kind of a Auvergne. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not anthropogenetic then the fact that the fugleman exempts ease and it is unwary is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent23 -> int1: the fact that the fugleman does exempt ease and is unwary is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the fugleman exempts ease and it is unwary does not hold it is not automotive.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fugleman is not automotive.; sent20 -> int4: the fact that the fugleman does not exempt balking but it does clean Cooperstown does not hold if it is not automotive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the fugleman does not exempt balking and cleans Cooperstown does not hold.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__