the metamorphousness happens.
sent1: that the rigmarole does not occur is prevented by that the dislodgment occurs. sent2: the non-euphoniousness and the non-emmetropicness happens. sent3: the rivaling Kaaba and the equalization occurs if the shooting neurotic does not occur. sent4: the establishment does not occur. sent5: the dislodgment is caused by that the AC does not occur and/or the protesting occurs. sent6: the non-metamorphousness is caused by that the protesting and the AC occurs. sent7: the salvage does not occur. sent8: if that the rivaling Kaaba happens is true then either the electrocution or the imprudentness or both happens. sent9: the dislodgment happens and the AC happens. sent10: if the fact that the moralization and the diabaticness occurs does not hold the fact that the diabaticness does not occur hold. sent11: that the remainder does not occur is brought about by the electrocution. sent12: that both the metamorphousness and the dislodgment occurs is brought about by that the AC does not occur. sent13: the fact that the moralization occurs and the diabaticness occurs is wrong if the remaindering does not occur. sent14: if the non-euphoniousness and the non-emmetropicness occurs the shooting neurotic does not occur. sent15: that the diabaticness does not occur and the produce does not occur triggers the metamorphousness. sent16: the protesting happens but the produce does not occur.
sent9 -> int1: the AC occurs.; sent16 -> int2: the protesting occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the protest and the AC happens.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the metamorphousness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the metamorphousness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the rigmarole does not occur is prevented by that the dislodgment occurs. sent2: the non-euphoniousness and the non-emmetropicness happens. sent3: the rivaling Kaaba and the equalization occurs if the shooting neurotic does not occur. sent4: the establishment does not occur. sent5: the dislodgment is caused by that the AC does not occur and/or the protesting occurs. sent6: the non-metamorphousness is caused by that the protesting and the AC occurs. sent7: the salvage does not occur. sent8: if that the rivaling Kaaba happens is true then either the electrocution or the imprudentness or both happens. sent9: the dislodgment happens and the AC happens. sent10: if the fact that the moralization and the diabaticness occurs does not hold the fact that the diabaticness does not occur hold. sent11: that the remainder does not occur is brought about by the electrocution. sent12: that both the metamorphousness and the dislodgment occurs is brought about by that the AC does not occur. sent13: the fact that the moralization occurs and the diabaticness occurs is wrong if the remaindering does not occur. sent14: if the non-euphoniousness and the non-emmetropicness occurs the shooting neurotic does not occur. sent15: that the diabaticness does not occur and the produce does not occur triggers the metamorphousness. sent16: the protesting happens but the produce does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the AC occurs.; sent16 -> int2: the protesting occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the protest and the AC happens.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__