the vermiculation is not psychosexual.
sent1: if the boudoir is not psychosexual it is non-ergotic thing that does not subject. sent2: that the vermiculation is non-diatomic but it is coccal is not true. sent3: that the heterograft is ergotic and it guarantees Delbruck does not hold if it is not a kind of a subject. sent4: the heterograft does not subject. sent5: if the heterograft is not a subject that it is not ergotic and does guarantee Delbruck is wrong. sent6: if the fact that the heterograft is non-ergotic thing that guarantees Delbruck does not hold then the fact that the vermiculation is psychosexual is true. sent7: the fact that the heterograft is ergotic and it guarantees Delbruck is not correct. sent8: if the vermiculation is a subject the heterograft is psychosexual.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that that the heterograft is not ergotic but it does guarantee Delbruck hold is not correct.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the boudoir is not ergotic.
$hypothesis$ = the vermiculation is not psychosexual. ; $context$ = sent1: if the boudoir is not psychosexual it is non-ergotic thing that does not subject. sent2: that the vermiculation is non-diatomic but it is coccal is not true. sent3: that the heterograft is ergotic and it guarantees Delbruck does not hold if it is not a kind of a subject. sent4: the heterograft does not subject. sent5: if the heterograft is not a subject that it is not ergotic and does guarantee Delbruck is wrong. sent6: if the fact that the heterograft is non-ergotic thing that guarantees Delbruck does not hold then the fact that the vermiculation is psychosexual is true. sent7: the fact that the heterograft is ergotic and it guarantees Delbruck is not correct. sent8: if the vermiculation is a subject the heterograft is psychosexual. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that that the heterograft is not ergotic but it does guarantee Delbruck hold is not correct.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__