there is something such that it is vinaceous and it is a Ull.
sent1: that the statice is not subsequent but it is a cetacean is not right if something is a referendum. sent2: that that the thymol is subsequent and is a Ull is wrong is not incorrect if the fact that the dasymeter does not introspect is not false. sent3: something is a referendum. sent4: the hypo does introspect if it is precise. sent5: the hypo is a kind of a Ull if it does introspect. sent6: the hypo is not non-vinaceous if that the statice is a kind of non-subsequent thing that is cetacean does not hold. sent7: if something is not subsequent it is either not non-vinaceous or not non-asclepiadaceous or both. sent8: that the statice is not subsequent is right if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of subsequent a Ull is wrong. sent9: if the statice is asclepiadaceous then the rotavirus is asclepiadaceous. sent10: the hypo is either not non-ovarian or not imprecise or both. sent11: if the hypo is ovarian it does introspect. sent12: something is a cetacean if the fact that it is a kind of a referendum is correct. sent13: if the statice is vinaceous that the rotavirus is asclepiadaceous is correct. sent14: the dasymeter does not introspect.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: that the statice is not subsequent and is cetacean is not true.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the hypo is vinaceous.; sent10 & sent11 & sent4 -> int3: the hypo does introspect.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the hypo is a Ull.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the hypo is vinaceous and it is a Ull.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rotavirus is both not non-cetacean and asclepiadaceous is not wrong.
sent2 & sent14 -> int6: the fact that the thymol is subsequent and it is a kind of a Ull is not right.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is subsequent and it is a Ull is not correct.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the statice is not subsequent.; sent7 -> int9: the fact that the statice is vinaceous or it is asclepiadaceous or both is not wrong if it is not subsequent.; int8 & int9 -> int10: either the statice is vinaceous or it is asclepiadaceous or both.; int10 & sent13 & sent9 -> int11: that the rotavirus is asclepiadaceous is true.; sent12 -> int12: the rotavirus is a kind of a cetacean if it is a referendum.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is vinaceous and it is a Ull. ; $context$ = sent1: that the statice is not subsequent but it is a cetacean is not right if something is a referendum. sent2: that that the thymol is subsequent and is a Ull is wrong is not incorrect if the fact that the dasymeter does not introspect is not false. sent3: something is a referendum. sent4: the hypo does introspect if it is precise. sent5: the hypo is a kind of a Ull if it does introspect. sent6: the hypo is not non-vinaceous if that the statice is a kind of non-subsequent thing that is cetacean does not hold. sent7: if something is not subsequent it is either not non-vinaceous or not non-asclepiadaceous or both. sent8: that the statice is not subsequent is right if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of subsequent a Ull is wrong. sent9: if the statice is asclepiadaceous then the rotavirus is asclepiadaceous. sent10: the hypo is either not non-ovarian or not imprecise or both. sent11: if the hypo is ovarian it does introspect. sent12: something is a cetacean if the fact that it is a kind of a referendum is correct. sent13: if the statice is vinaceous that the rotavirus is asclepiadaceous is correct. sent14: the dasymeter does not introspect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: that the statice is not subsequent and is cetacean is not true.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the hypo is vinaceous.; sent10 & sent11 & sent4 -> int3: the hypo does introspect.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the hypo is a Ull.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the hypo is vinaceous and it is a Ull.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__