there exists something such that if it effaces Kekule that it is not a peg and it is not a kind of a warlock is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not non-albitic then the fact that it does not tin accuracy and it effaces inefficacy is wrong. sent2: if the landscaper does efface Kekule that it is not a peg and it is not a kind of a warlock is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it effaces Kekule then the fact that it is not a peg but a warlock does not hold.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it effaces Kekule that it is not a peg and it is not a kind of a warlock is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not non-albitic then the fact that it does not tin accuracy and it effaces inefficacy is wrong. sent2: if the landscaper does efface Kekule that it is not a peg and it is not a kind of a warlock is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it effaces Kekule then the fact that it is not a peg but a warlock does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__