the heliport is gymnastic and does humanize.
sent1: the heliport is gymnastic. sent2: the heliport does comfort Duchamp. sent3: if that something is both ventilatory and a fingerpost is not true then it is not sensational. sent4: that the heliport humanizes and does intrude bacchant is incorrect if the exodontist does not comfort marl. sent5: if there is something such that that it is a kind of aculeate thing that is not anaphoric does not hold the heliport does comfort marl. sent6: the exodontist is a kind of a ceftriaxone and does intrude bacchant. sent7: if the fact that the exodontist comforts marl and is a kind of a jellaba is wrong it is not gymnastic. sent8: if that the dustcloth is not unchangeable but it is gymnastic is not correct then the Turner is gymnastic. sent9: the dustcloth does intrude ablaut. sent10: the foster-daughter is a ceftriaxone. sent11: something is polyvalent but it is not a Halakah. sent12: the dustcloth is changeable if it is a kind of aculeate thing that is non-anaphoric. sent13: the dustcloth is a jellaba. sent14: the dustcloth is aculeate if it intrudes bacchant. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it does intrude bacchant and it is anaphoric is not correct. sent16: the fact that the exodontist is a kind of a jellaba and it is a tundra is incorrect if the dustcloth is changeable. sent17: if the fact that something is a jellaba and a tundra is not right then it is not a ceftriaxone. sent18: the dustcloth is not a tundra. sent19: that the dustcloth does humanize and is anaphoric is not true. sent20: there is something such that that it does comfort marl and does not intrude bacchant is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dustcloth is aculeate but it is not anaphoric.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the dustcloth is not unchangeable.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the exodontist is a kind of a jellaba and it is a tundra is false.; sent17 -> int3: if the fact that the exodontist is a jellaba and a tundra is incorrect then it is not a kind of a ceftriaxone.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the exodontist is not a ceftriaxone.; sent6 -> int5: the exodontist is a kind of a ceftriaxone.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the dustcloth is aculeate and is not anaphoric is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is aculeate and is not anaphoric does not hold.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the heliport does comfort marl.;
the Turner is gymnastic.
$hypothesis$ = the heliport is gymnastic and does humanize. ; $context$ = sent1: the heliport is gymnastic. sent2: the heliport does comfort Duchamp. sent3: if that something is both ventilatory and a fingerpost is not true then it is not sensational. sent4: that the heliport humanizes and does intrude bacchant is incorrect if the exodontist does not comfort marl. sent5: if there is something such that that it is a kind of aculeate thing that is not anaphoric does not hold the heliport does comfort marl. sent6: the exodontist is a kind of a ceftriaxone and does intrude bacchant. sent7: if the fact that the exodontist comforts marl and is a kind of a jellaba is wrong it is not gymnastic. sent8: if that the dustcloth is not unchangeable but it is gymnastic is not correct then the Turner is gymnastic. sent9: the dustcloth does intrude ablaut. sent10: the foster-daughter is a ceftriaxone. sent11: something is polyvalent but it is not a Halakah. sent12: the dustcloth is changeable if it is a kind of aculeate thing that is non-anaphoric. sent13: the dustcloth is a jellaba. sent14: the dustcloth is aculeate if it intrudes bacchant. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it does intrude bacchant and it is anaphoric is not correct. sent16: the fact that the exodontist is a kind of a jellaba and it is a tundra is incorrect if the dustcloth is changeable. sent17: if the fact that something is a jellaba and a tundra is not right then it is not a ceftriaxone. sent18: the dustcloth is not a tundra. sent19: that the dustcloth does humanize and is anaphoric is not true. sent20: there is something such that that it does comfort marl and does not intrude bacchant is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dustcloth is aculeate but it is not anaphoric.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the dustcloth is not unchangeable.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the exodontist is a kind of a jellaba and it is a tundra is false.; sent17 -> int3: if the fact that the exodontist is a jellaba and a tundra is incorrect then it is not a kind of a ceftriaxone.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the exodontist is not a ceftriaxone.; sent6 -> int5: the exodontist is a kind of a ceftriaxone.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the dustcloth is aculeate and is not anaphoric is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is aculeate and is not anaphoric does not hold.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the heliport does comfort marl.; __UNKNOWN__