the caricaturist is not a kind of a bohemian.
sent1: the nibbler does not invigorate if there is something such that that it does invigorate and it is not proximate does not hold. sent2: that the nibbler does not vacate crochet and is not a checkup does not hold if it does not invigorate. sent3: if the caricaturist is bohemian and it is conscientious the romper is not a checkup. sent4: the caricaturist is conscientious. sent5: the fact that the detective does invigorate and is not proximate is incorrect. sent6: the fact that if the romper is not a checkup then the nibbler does not vacate crochet and is not a checkup is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caricaturist is not non-bohemian.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the caricaturist is bohemian and conscientious.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the romper is not a kind of a checkup.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the nibbler does not vacate crochet and is not a checkup.; sent5 -> int4: there is something such that that it does invigorate and is not proximate does not hold.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the nibbler does not invigorate.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the nibbler does not vacate crochet and is not a checkup does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the caricaturist is not a kind of a bohemian. ; $context$ = sent1: the nibbler does not invigorate if there is something such that that it does invigorate and it is not proximate does not hold. sent2: that the nibbler does not vacate crochet and is not a checkup does not hold if it does not invigorate. sent3: if the caricaturist is bohemian and it is conscientious the romper is not a checkup. sent4: the caricaturist is conscientious. sent5: the fact that the detective does invigorate and is not proximate is incorrect. sent6: the fact that if the romper is not a checkup then the nibbler does not vacate crochet and is not a checkup is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caricaturist is not non-bohemian.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the caricaturist is bohemian and conscientious.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the romper is not a kind of a checkup.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the nibbler does not vacate crochet and is not a checkup.; sent5 -> int4: there is something such that that it does invigorate and is not proximate does not hold.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the nibbler does not invigorate.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the nibbler does not vacate crochet and is not a checkup does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__