there is something such that if it is a cloak it is both not a babytalk and not bivalve.
sent1: a flexible thing is both not a monorail and not a Seth. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a cloak it is a babytalk and is not a bivalve. sent3: if the dissociation is a cloak it is both a babytalk and not bivalve. sent4: if the fact that the dissociation cloaks is not incorrect it is not a bivalve. sent5: if the dissociation does cloak then it is both not a babytalk and not a bivalve. sent6: there is something such that if it is a cloak it is not a bivalve. sent7: there exists something such that if it cloaks it is not a kind of a babytalk and is a bivalve. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a cloak is right then it is not a babytalk.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is flexible it is not a kind of a monorail and it is not a Seth.
sent1 -> int1: the dolmen is not a monorail and is not a Seth if it is flexible.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a cloak it is both not a babytalk and not bivalve. ; $context$ = sent1: a flexible thing is both not a monorail and not a Seth. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a cloak it is a babytalk and is not a bivalve. sent3: if the dissociation is a cloak it is both a babytalk and not bivalve. sent4: if the fact that the dissociation cloaks is not incorrect it is not a bivalve. sent5: if the dissociation does cloak then it is both not a babytalk and not a bivalve. sent6: there is something such that if it is a cloak it is not a bivalve. sent7: there exists something such that if it cloaks it is not a kind of a babytalk and is a bivalve. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a cloak is right then it is not a babytalk. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__