if the goby is not unregretful the tailgater is either insurmountable or not non-ornithological or both.
sent1: the tailgater is insurmountable and/or it is unregretful. sent2: the goby is unregretful and/or it is ornithological if the tailgater does not reciprocate tilled. sent3: the fact that the tailgater is a shadiness is not incorrect. sent4: the bragger is not insurmountable. sent5: the goby is unregretful and/or reciprocates busbar. sent6: the tailgater is insurmountable if the goby reciprocates tilled and is not unregretful. sent7: if the tailgater is insurmountable and unregretful then the goby is ornithological. sent8: if the tailgater is a kind of ornithological thing that does reciprocate tilled the goby is insurmountable. sent9: either the tailgater is unregretful or it is insurmountable or both if that the goby does not reciprocate tilled is right. sent10: the goby is ornithological if the tailgater does reciprocate tilled and it is unregretful. sent11: the goby is ornithological. sent12: either the tailgater is unregretful or it reciprocates tilled or both if the fact that the goby is ornithological is not false. sent13: the poncho is not unregretful. sent14: the goby is insurmountable if the tailgater is a kind of unregretful thing that does not reciprocate tilled. sent15: The tilled does reciprocate goby. sent16: if the goby is insurmountable the tailgater does reciprocate tilled and/or it is ornithological. sent17: if the tailgater is not unregretful the goby is insurmountable or it is ornithological or both. sent18: the tailgater is conspiratorial and is not a rental. sent19: the tailgater is a reptile and not eusporangiate. sent20: the tailgater is unregretful and/or it does reciprocate tilled if the goby is not insurmountable. sent21: the condensate is an erosion and/or it is ornithological. sent22: the fact that the goby is unregretful is correct if the tailgater is a kind of ornithological thing that reciprocates tilled. sent23: the goby does reciprocate tilled.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the goby is not unregretful.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the goby reciprocates tilled and is not unregretful.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the tailgater is insurmountable.; int2 -> int3: either the tailgater is insurmountable or it is not non-ornithological or both.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the goby is not unregretful the tailgater is either insurmountable or not non-ornithological or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the tailgater is insurmountable and/or it is unregretful. sent2: the goby is unregretful and/or it is ornithological if the tailgater does not reciprocate tilled. sent3: the fact that the tailgater is a shadiness is not incorrect. sent4: the bragger is not insurmountable. sent5: the goby is unregretful and/or reciprocates busbar. sent6: the tailgater is insurmountable if the goby reciprocates tilled and is not unregretful. sent7: if the tailgater is insurmountable and unregretful then the goby is ornithological. sent8: if the tailgater is a kind of ornithological thing that does reciprocate tilled the goby is insurmountable. sent9: either the tailgater is unregretful or it is insurmountable or both if that the goby does not reciprocate tilled is right. sent10: the goby is ornithological if the tailgater does reciprocate tilled and it is unregretful. sent11: the goby is ornithological. sent12: either the tailgater is unregretful or it reciprocates tilled or both if the fact that the goby is ornithological is not false. sent13: the poncho is not unregretful. sent14: the goby is insurmountable if the tailgater is a kind of unregretful thing that does not reciprocate tilled. sent15: The tilled does reciprocate goby. sent16: if the goby is insurmountable the tailgater does reciprocate tilled and/or it is ornithological. sent17: if the tailgater is not unregretful the goby is insurmountable or it is ornithological or both. sent18: the tailgater is conspiratorial and is not a rental. sent19: the tailgater is a reptile and not eusporangiate. sent20: the tailgater is unregretful and/or it does reciprocate tilled if the goby is not insurmountable. sent21: the condensate is an erosion and/or it is ornithological. sent22: the fact that the goby is unregretful is correct if the tailgater is a kind of ornithological thing that reciprocates tilled. sent23: the goby does reciprocate tilled. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the goby is not unregretful.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the goby reciprocates tilled and is not unregretful.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the tailgater is insurmountable.; int2 -> int3: either the tailgater is insurmountable or it is not non-ornithological or both.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__