that there exists something such that if that it does ascend and it does bloom does not hold it is not a beneficiary is incorrect.
sent1: the aneroid is not a rococo if that it is a bloom and is a inosine is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if that it ascends and is a bloom is incorrect then it is a kind of a beneficiary. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a Numidian and it reciprocates pinto is not right the fact that it does not spoof Styx hold. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it dandles partition and it demilitarizes is false it is not a kind of a fantan. sent5: if the aneroid does not ascend it is not beneficiary. sent6: the curacao is not a kind of a geology if that it is a beneficiary and it is glossopharyngeal does not hold. sent7: if that something is a telco and is a messuage does not hold then that it is not a dribble is true. sent8: something is not deductible if that it does reciprocate praenomen and it is unbridgeable is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it does not bloom that it is not a beneficiary hold. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a messuage that does dandle Crosby is false then it is not a Ziegler. sent11: if that that the aneroid does ascend and blooms is not true is right it is not a kind of a beneficiary. sent12: there is something such that if it does not ascend then it is not a beneficiary. sent13: if the aneroid ascends and is a bloom then it is not beneficiary. sent14: there is something such that if that it is a limbus and it does dandle partition does not hold then it is not a kind of a leek. sent15: if that the aneroid does ascend and is a bloom is wrong then it is a beneficiary. sent16: there exists something such that if it ascends and it does bloom then it is not beneficiary. sent17: if that something is drinkable and it is a kind of a Hippodamia is false then it is not an incinerator.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
the pluviometer is not a kind of an incinerator if that it is a kind of drinkable thing that is a Hippodamia does not hold.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it does ascend and it does bloom does not hold it is not a beneficiary is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the aneroid is not a rococo if that it is a bloom and is a inosine is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if that it ascends and is a bloom is incorrect then it is a kind of a beneficiary. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a Numidian and it reciprocates pinto is not right the fact that it does not spoof Styx hold. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it dandles partition and it demilitarizes is false it is not a kind of a fantan. sent5: if the aneroid does not ascend it is not beneficiary. sent6: the curacao is not a kind of a geology if that it is a beneficiary and it is glossopharyngeal does not hold. sent7: if that something is a telco and is a messuage does not hold then that it is not a dribble is true. sent8: something is not deductible if that it does reciprocate praenomen and it is unbridgeable is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it does not bloom that it is not a beneficiary hold. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a messuage that does dandle Crosby is false then it is not a Ziegler. sent11: if that that the aneroid does ascend and blooms is not true is right it is not a kind of a beneficiary. sent12: there is something such that if it does not ascend then it is not a beneficiary. sent13: if the aneroid ascends and is a bloom then it is not beneficiary. sent14: there is something such that if that it is a limbus and it does dandle partition does not hold then it is not a kind of a leek. sent15: if that the aneroid does ascend and is a bloom is wrong then it is a beneficiary. sent16: there exists something such that if it ascends and it does bloom then it is not beneficiary. sent17: if that something is drinkable and it is a kind of a Hippodamia is false then it is not an incinerator. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__