the ergotropism is a stilt and does not consolidate petrifaction.
sent1: the rice is not an epsilon if it is disreputable thing that is not photic. sent2: if the bow scouts Homarus the cornmeal consolidates imperiousness. sent3: the main-topmast is a stilt. sent4: something that scouts Homarus is both not an epsilon and not commemorative. sent5: if the cornmeal consolidates imperiousness then the fact that the pargeting does not consolidate Caloocan is true. sent6: if something is not a kind of a commemorative the bow scouts Homarus. sent7: the fact that the jetliner is not an overlord but a commemorative is wrong if the rice is not an epsilon. sent8: the rice is not reputable and it is not photic. sent9: the bow scouts Homarus and does not consolidate petrifaction if the ergotropism is not reputable. sent10: the bow is photic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not scout Homarus and is a kind of an overlord does not hold. sent11: if something is not an overlord then that it is a stilt and does not consolidate petrifaction is not true. sent12: something is not an overlord but it is a commemorative. sent13: the fact that the bow does scout Homarus is not false if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an overlord and it is a commemorative does not hold. sent14: the rice is not an epsilon if it is reputable and it is not photic. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it is an overlord that is a commemorative does not hold. sent16: that the ergotropism does not consolidate petrifaction is correct. sent17: the pargeting is a stilt. sent18: that the ergotropism is a kind of a stilt but it does not consolidate petrifaction is right if the pargeting does not consolidate Caloocan. sent19: the ergotropism does not consolidate petrifaction if the fact that the pargeting does not consolidate Caloocan is not false. sent20: the bow does consolidate Caloocan if there exists something such that that it is not a commemorative and it does scout Homarus is not true. sent21: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a precondition and it is a kind of a canker is not right. sent22: the cornmeal is not a mantissa. sent23: the rice is not reputable.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the rice is not an epsilon.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the jetliner is not a kind of an overlord but it is a kind of a commemorative does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not an overlord and is not non-commemorative is false.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the bow scouts Homarus.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the cornmeal does consolidate imperiousness.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the pargeting does not consolidate Caloocan hold.; sent18 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the ergotropism is a stilt and does not consolidate petrifaction is incorrect.
sent11 -> int7: that if the ergotropism is not a kind of the overlord then that the ergotropism is a stilt that does not consolidate petrifaction is wrong is true.; sent4 -> int8: if the rice scouts Homarus then it is not an epsilon and it is not a commemorative.;
$hypothesis$ = the ergotropism is a stilt and does not consolidate petrifaction. ; $context$ = sent1: the rice is not an epsilon if it is disreputable thing that is not photic. sent2: if the bow scouts Homarus the cornmeal consolidates imperiousness. sent3: the main-topmast is a stilt. sent4: something that scouts Homarus is both not an epsilon and not commemorative. sent5: if the cornmeal consolidates imperiousness then the fact that the pargeting does not consolidate Caloocan is true. sent6: if something is not a kind of a commemorative the bow scouts Homarus. sent7: the fact that the jetliner is not an overlord but a commemorative is wrong if the rice is not an epsilon. sent8: the rice is not reputable and it is not photic. sent9: the bow scouts Homarus and does not consolidate petrifaction if the ergotropism is not reputable. sent10: the bow is photic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not scout Homarus and is a kind of an overlord does not hold. sent11: if something is not an overlord then that it is a stilt and does not consolidate petrifaction is not true. sent12: something is not an overlord but it is a commemorative. sent13: the fact that the bow does scout Homarus is not false if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of an overlord and it is a commemorative does not hold. sent14: the rice is not an epsilon if it is reputable and it is not photic. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it is an overlord that is a commemorative does not hold. sent16: that the ergotropism does not consolidate petrifaction is correct. sent17: the pargeting is a stilt. sent18: that the ergotropism is a kind of a stilt but it does not consolidate petrifaction is right if the pargeting does not consolidate Caloocan. sent19: the ergotropism does not consolidate petrifaction if the fact that the pargeting does not consolidate Caloocan is not false. sent20: the bow does consolidate Caloocan if there exists something such that that it is not a commemorative and it does scout Homarus is not true. sent21: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a precondition and it is a kind of a canker is not right. sent22: the cornmeal is not a mantissa. sent23: the rice is not reputable. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the rice is not an epsilon.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the jetliner is not a kind of an overlord but it is a kind of a commemorative does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not an overlord and is not non-commemorative is false.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the bow scouts Homarus.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the cornmeal does consolidate imperiousness.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the pargeting does not consolidate Caloocan hold.; sent18 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__