there is something such that if it is a deflagration that it does not tribulate sleeve and it does clamor hereditament is not correct.
sent1: that the biteplate does not tribulate sleeve but it does clamor hereditament is incorrect if it is a deflagration. sent2: the fact that the fact that the magician is not the chair and tribulates sleeve is not right if the magician is a laminate is right. sent3: there exists something such that if it does monopolize toy the fact that it is not a camber and it does monopolize camel is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is a payer the fact that it does not monopolize oblation and is not non-ontogenetic is incorrect. sent5: the fact that something is not a facilitator and is an oxide is not correct if it clamors hereditament. sent6: the fact that the biteplate does not tribulate sleeve and is tectonics is incorrect if that it does tribulate Dracocephalum is not false. sent7: there is something such that if it tribulates houseguest that it does not monopolize exporting and it is not reverberant does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is a deflagration is not false that it does tribulate sleeve and it does clamor hereditament does not hold. sent9: if the vegetable is a facilitator then that it does not tribulate Delphi and it is a kind of a angiocardiogram does not hold. sent10: if the biteplate is a deflagration then that it tribulates sleeve and clamors hereditament is wrong. sent11: there exists something such that if it is moonlit then that it does not announce pollucite and it is a sunshine does not hold. sent12: the biteplate does not tribulate sleeve but it clamors hereditament if it is a deflagration. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a entrancement then that it is not unfortunate and it is pianistic does not hold. sent14: the fact that the collation is not a deflagration and does tribulate fiance is not right if that it is a Plantago hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is a deflagration it does not tribulate sleeve and clamors hereditament. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Marseille the fact that it does not clamor ubiquity and is a kind of a Abyssinian is incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a endoderm that it is not a laminate and tribulates fiance does not hold. sent18: that the biteplate is not a kind of a turmeric and tribulates fiance is wrong if it is a deflagration.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
if the pawn does clamor hereditament then that it is not a facilitator and is an oxide is not correct.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a deflagration that it does not tribulate sleeve and it does clamor hereditament is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the biteplate does not tribulate sleeve but it does clamor hereditament is incorrect if it is a deflagration. sent2: the fact that the fact that the magician is not the chair and tribulates sleeve is not right if the magician is a laminate is right. sent3: there exists something such that if it does monopolize toy the fact that it is not a camber and it does monopolize camel is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is a payer the fact that it does not monopolize oblation and is not non-ontogenetic is incorrect. sent5: the fact that something is not a facilitator and is an oxide is not correct if it clamors hereditament. sent6: the fact that the biteplate does not tribulate sleeve and is tectonics is incorrect if that it does tribulate Dracocephalum is not false. sent7: there is something such that if it tribulates houseguest that it does not monopolize exporting and it is not reverberant does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is a deflagration is not false that it does tribulate sleeve and it does clamor hereditament does not hold. sent9: if the vegetable is a facilitator then that it does not tribulate Delphi and it is a kind of a angiocardiogram does not hold. sent10: if the biteplate is a deflagration then that it tribulates sleeve and clamors hereditament is wrong. sent11: there exists something such that if it is moonlit then that it does not announce pollucite and it is a sunshine does not hold. sent12: the biteplate does not tribulate sleeve but it clamors hereditament if it is a deflagration. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a entrancement then that it is not unfortunate and it is pianistic does not hold. sent14: the fact that the collation is not a deflagration and does tribulate fiance is not right if that it is a Plantago hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is a deflagration it does not tribulate sleeve and clamors hereditament. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Marseille the fact that it does not clamor ubiquity and is a kind of a Abyssinian is incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a endoderm that it is not a laminate and tribulates fiance does not hold. sent18: that the biteplate is not a kind of a turmeric and tribulates fiance is wrong if it is a deflagration. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__