the shimmer does not occur.
sent1: if the articulation does not occur the shimmering but not the formalizing Scythia occurs. sent2: the voltaicness does not occur if the shimmer occurs and the formalizing Scythia occurs. sent3: the tuberculateness occurs or the amygdalineness does not occur or both. sent4: the tuberculateness happens or the amygdalineness happens or both. sent5: if that not the reallotment but the owning self-assertion happens is not correct then the reallotment happens. sent6: the fact that not the rubbing but the disobeying occurs is not true. sent7: the owning cullis does not occur. sent8: the isopteranness does not occur if the owning gamma and the riposting foodstuff occurs. sent9: that the formalizing Scythia happens is not wrong if the articulation occurs. sent10: the rubbing occurs if the fact that the rubbing does not occur but the disobeying happens is wrong. sent11: that the rubbing occurs and the disobeying occurs is wrong. sent12: the articulation occurs if the amygdalineness does not occur. sent13: if the voltaicness does not occur then the rubbing does not occur. sent14: that either the tuberculateness occurs or the amygdalineness does not occur or both leads to that the articulation occurs. sent15: if the pulsation does not occur then the voltaicness and the rubbing occurs.
sent14 & sent3 -> int1: that the articulation happens is not incorrect.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the formalizing Scythia happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shimmering happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the shimmering and the formalizing Scythia occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the voltaicness does not occur.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the rubbing does not occur.; sent10 & sent6 -> int6: the rubbing happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the shimmering occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the shimmer does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the articulation does not occur the shimmering but not the formalizing Scythia occurs. sent2: the voltaicness does not occur if the shimmer occurs and the formalizing Scythia occurs. sent3: the tuberculateness occurs or the amygdalineness does not occur or both. sent4: the tuberculateness happens or the amygdalineness happens or both. sent5: if that not the reallotment but the owning self-assertion happens is not correct then the reallotment happens. sent6: the fact that not the rubbing but the disobeying occurs is not true. sent7: the owning cullis does not occur. sent8: the isopteranness does not occur if the owning gamma and the riposting foodstuff occurs. sent9: that the formalizing Scythia happens is not wrong if the articulation occurs. sent10: the rubbing occurs if the fact that the rubbing does not occur but the disobeying happens is wrong. sent11: that the rubbing occurs and the disobeying occurs is wrong. sent12: the articulation occurs if the amygdalineness does not occur. sent13: if the voltaicness does not occur then the rubbing does not occur. sent14: that either the tuberculateness occurs or the amygdalineness does not occur or both leads to that the articulation occurs. sent15: if the pulsation does not occur then the voltaicness and the rubbing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent3 -> int1: that the articulation happens is not incorrect.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the formalizing Scythia happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shimmering happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the shimmering and the formalizing Scythia occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the voltaicness does not occur.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the rubbing does not occur.; sent10 & sent6 -> int6: the rubbing happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__