the incineration does not occur.
sent1: the fact that both the idealization and the sophisticating wampum happens is wrong if the moneranness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that both the idealization and the sophisticating wampum occurs is not true the sophisticating wampum does not occur. sent3: the moneranness does not occur. sent4: the fact that not the rewriting precedence but the abnormality happens hold if the monoclonalness does not occur. sent5: the incineration occurs if the exploring does not occur and the preserving happens. sent6: the preserving occurs. sent7: the hysterectomy happens and the starchiness happens if the sophisticating wampum does not occur. sent8: the rewriting bane occurs if the rewriting precedence does not occur and the abnormality occurs. sent9: the monoclonalness does not occur. sent10: the hysterectomy does not occur if both the rewriting bane and the exploring occurs.
sent4 & sent9 -> int1: the rewriting precedence does not occur but the abnormality occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the rewriting bane occurs is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exploring happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the rewriting bane and the exploring occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the hysterectomy does not occur.; sent1 & sent3 -> int5: that the idealization and the sophisticating wampum happens is not true.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the sophisticating wampum does not occur is right.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the hysterectomy and the starchiness happens.; int7 -> int8: the hysterectomy happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the exploring does not occur.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the exploring does not occur and the preserve occurs.; int11 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the incineration does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the idealization and the sophisticating wampum happens is wrong if the moneranness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that both the idealization and the sophisticating wampum occurs is not true the sophisticating wampum does not occur. sent3: the moneranness does not occur. sent4: the fact that not the rewriting precedence but the abnormality happens hold if the monoclonalness does not occur. sent5: the incineration occurs if the exploring does not occur and the preserving happens. sent6: the preserving occurs. sent7: the hysterectomy happens and the starchiness happens if the sophisticating wampum does not occur. sent8: the rewriting bane occurs if the rewriting precedence does not occur and the abnormality occurs. sent9: the monoclonalness does not occur. sent10: the hysterectomy does not occur if both the rewriting bane and the exploring occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent9 -> int1: the rewriting precedence does not occur but the abnormality occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the rewriting bane occurs is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exploring happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the rewriting bane and the exploring occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the hysterectomy does not occur.; sent1 & sent3 -> int5: that the idealization and the sophisticating wampum happens is not true.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the sophisticating wampum does not occur is right.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the hysterectomy and the starchiness happens.; int7 -> int8: the hysterectomy happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the exploring does not occur.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the exploring does not occur and the preserve occurs.; int11 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__