the fact that the collard articulates Colombo and is a Shoshone is not correct.
sent1: the waxmallow is a kind of a denial if that the letterhead is inboard is correct. sent2: the collard is a Shoshone if it does articulate Herculaneum. sent3: the waxmallow is technophilic. sent4: that the waxmallow does not articulate Colombo and is not technophilic hold if the chador is not a denial. sent5: the letterhead is not technophilic. sent6: the collard is inboard if the letterhead does articulate Herculaneum. sent7: if something does not articulate Herculaneum and/or it is not an augur then the cripple does not articulate Herculaneum. sent8: something is not a denial if the fact that it is a kind of a binary that is a kind of a denial does not hold. sent9: if the fact that something is not technophilic is not incorrect it is unrepeatable. sent10: a non-technophilic thing is both unrepeatable and inboard. sent11: the argus is inboard and is a Tanga. sent12: if the waxmallow is a denial then the collard articulates Herculaneum. sent13: the collard articulates Colombo. sent14: there is something such that it does not articulate Herculaneum and/or it is not an augur. sent15: The Colombo articulates collard.
sent10 -> int1: the letterhead is not repeatable and it is inboard if it is not technophilic.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the letterhead is a kind of unrepeatable thing that is inboard.; int2 -> int3: the letterhead is inboard.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the waxmallow is a kind of a denial.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the collard does articulate Herculaneum.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the collard is a Shoshone.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the collard articulates Colombo and is a kind of a Shoshone does not hold.
sent8 -> int7: that the chador is not a denial is not false if the fact that it is not non-binary but a denial is wrong.; sent14 & sent7 -> int8: the cripple does not articulate Herculaneum.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does not articulate Herculaneum.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the collard articulates Colombo and is a Shoshone is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the waxmallow is a kind of a denial if that the letterhead is inboard is correct. sent2: the collard is a Shoshone if it does articulate Herculaneum. sent3: the waxmallow is technophilic. sent4: that the waxmallow does not articulate Colombo and is not technophilic hold if the chador is not a denial. sent5: the letterhead is not technophilic. sent6: the collard is inboard if the letterhead does articulate Herculaneum. sent7: if something does not articulate Herculaneum and/or it is not an augur then the cripple does not articulate Herculaneum. sent8: something is not a denial if the fact that it is a kind of a binary that is a kind of a denial does not hold. sent9: if the fact that something is not technophilic is not incorrect it is unrepeatable. sent10: a non-technophilic thing is both unrepeatable and inboard. sent11: the argus is inboard and is a Tanga. sent12: if the waxmallow is a denial then the collard articulates Herculaneum. sent13: the collard articulates Colombo. sent14: there is something such that it does not articulate Herculaneum and/or it is not an augur. sent15: The Colombo articulates collard. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the letterhead is not repeatable and it is inboard if it is not technophilic.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the letterhead is a kind of unrepeatable thing that is inboard.; int2 -> int3: the letterhead is inboard.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the waxmallow is a kind of a denial.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the collard does articulate Herculaneum.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the collard is a Shoshone.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__