there exists something such that if that it is a kind of rehabilitative thing that does not capture trusteeship is wrong it does not deafen CRT.
sent1: if that that the parish is rehabilitative and does not capture trusteeship does not hold is not incorrect it deafens CRT. sent2: if that the parish is rehabilitative thing that does not capture trusteeship is false the fact that it does not deafen CRT hold. sent3: if that something is a hematocrit but it does not deafen CRT does not hold then it is not unable. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a macroeconomist that is not Beethovenian does not hold it is not a unexchangeability. sent5: if the fact that the parish does capture trusteeship is not false it does not deafen CRT. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is rehabilitative and it does capture trusteeship is not right it does not deafen CRT. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is rehabilitative and it does not capture trusteeship does not hold then it deafens CRT. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is acetylic and it is not linguistic is not true it is not equitable. sent9: there is something such that if it does capture trusteeship then it does not deafen CRT. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is Cenozoic and it is not a kind of an asphalt does not hold it is not a bonanza. sent11: if the parish is rehabilitative and does not capture trusteeship then it does not deafen CRT. sent12: there is something such that if it is rehabilitative and it does not capture trusteeship then it does not deafen CRT. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is not rehabilitative is not false then it does not deafen CRT.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
the uterus is not unable if the fact that it is a kind of a hematocrit that does not deafen CRT does not hold.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a kind of rehabilitative thing that does not capture trusteeship is wrong it does not deafen CRT. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that the parish is rehabilitative and does not capture trusteeship does not hold is not incorrect it deafens CRT. sent2: if that the parish is rehabilitative thing that does not capture trusteeship is false the fact that it does not deafen CRT hold. sent3: if that something is a hematocrit but it does not deafen CRT does not hold then it is not unable. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a macroeconomist that is not Beethovenian does not hold it is not a unexchangeability. sent5: if the fact that the parish does capture trusteeship is not false it does not deafen CRT. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is rehabilitative and it does capture trusteeship is not right it does not deafen CRT. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is rehabilitative and it does not capture trusteeship does not hold then it deafens CRT. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is acetylic and it is not linguistic is not true it is not equitable. sent9: there is something such that if it does capture trusteeship then it does not deafen CRT. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is Cenozoic and it is not a kind of an asphalt does not hold it is not a bonanza. sent11: if the parish is rehabilitative and does not capture trusteeship then it does not deafen CRT. sent12: there is something such that if it is rehabilitative and it does not capture trusteeship then it does not deafen CRT. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is not rehabilitative is not false then it does not deafen CRT. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__