if the journey does not occur then the fact that the minuet does not occur and the confusion does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the inverse happens. sent2: that the muff does not occur is triggered by that the ballup occurs. sent3: that that the lunisolarness happens and the repositioning does not occur is not right is correct if the exculpatoriness does not occur. sent4: that the aleuronicness does not occur but the glandularness occurs is wrong. sent5: the profitableness happens. sent6: that the minuet does not occur and the confusion occurs is incorrect. sent7: that the minuet does not occur and the confusion does not occur is incorrect if the journey occurs. sent8: both the profitableness and the journey happens if the muffing does not occur. sent9: the cathecting backache does not occur if either the inefficaciousness happens or the skank happens or both. sent10: the blockade or the electrostaticness or both occurs. sent11: that the nonprehensileness does not occur and the ringing does not occur is false. sent12: if the Secession does not occur then the fact that the minuet does not occur and the confusion does not occur is not right. sent13: that the minuet does not occur and the confusion does not occur is triggered by that the journey does not occur. sent14: the specific does not occur. sent15: if the albinalness does not occur the fact that both the unsupportiveness and the Churchillianness occurs is wrong. sent16: if that the journey does not occur hold then that not the minuet but the confusion happens is not right. sent17: that the muff does not occur causes that the profitableness occurs. sent18: the mercilessness occurs. sent19: the flocking Chihuahua happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Secession happens.; assump1 -> int1: the ballup or the Secession or both happens.;
$hypothesis$ = if the journey does not occur then the fact that the minuet does not occur and the confusion does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the inverse happens. sent2: that the muff does not occur is triggered by that the ballup occurs. sent3: that that the lunisolarness happens and the repositioning does not occur is not right is correct if the exculpatoriness does not occur. sent4: that the aleuronicness does not occur but the glandularness occurs is wrong. sent5: the profitableness happens. sent6: that the minuet does not occur and the confusion occurs is incorrect. sent7: that the minuet does not occur and the confusion does not occur is incorrect if the journey occurs. sent8: both the profitableness and the journey happens if the muffing does not occur. sent9: the cathecting backache does not occur if either the inefficaciousness happens or the skank happens or both. sent10: the blockade or the electrostaticness or both occurs. sent11: that the nonprehensileness does not occur and the ringing does not occur is false. sent12: if the Secession does not occur then the fact that the minuet does not occur and the confusion does not occur is not right. sent13: that the minuet does not occur and the confusion does not occur is triggered by that the journey does not occur. sent14: the specific does not occur. sent15: if the albinalness does not occur the fact that both the unsupportiveness and the Churchillianness occurs is wrong. sent16: if that the journey does not occur hold then that not the minuet but the confusion happens is not right. sent17: that the muff does not occur causes that the profitableness occurs. sent18: the mercilessness occurs. sent19: the flocking Chihuahua happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Secession happens.; assump1 -> int1: the ballup or the Secession or both happens.; __UNKNOWN__