the fact that the takeout is non-nonpsychoactive thing that is not two-wheel is not incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that the takeout is not nonpsychoactive is not correct then the Parsee is an ace. sent2: if the fact that the Parsee aces is not false then the garibaldi is non-adverbial thing that is not an aces. sent3: the garibaldi does not cog if it is not adverbial and not an ace. sent4: the takeout is not two-wheel. sent5: the garibaldi pleats southernism and is a cogged.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the takeout is nonpsychoactive.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Parsee is an ace.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the garibaldi is not a kind of an adverbial and does not ace.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the garibaldi is not a cogged.; sent5 -> int4: the garibaldi is a cogged.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the takeout is not nonpsychoactive is right.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the takeout is non-nonpsychoactive thing that is not two-wheel is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the takeout is not nonpsychoactive is not correct then the Parsee is an ace. sent2: if the fact that the Parsee aces is not false then the garibaldi is non-adverbial thing that is not an aces. sent3: the garibaldi does not cog if it is not adverbial and not an ace. sent4: the takeout is not two-wheel. sent5: the garibaldi pleats southernism and is a cogged. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the takeout is nonpsychoactive.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Parsee is an ace.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the garibaldi is not a kind of an adverbial and does not ace.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the garibaldi is not a cogged.; sent5 -> int4: the garibaldi is a cogged.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the takeout is not nonpsychoactive is right.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__