the shanghaier does not strand onomatopoeia.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is elemental and it is a laxative is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that it is both not cachectic and not non-laxative the stitcher is tubal. sent3: the shanghaier is not elemental if it strands onomatopoeia and is not non-tubal. sent4: that the ohmmeter is a laxative and it does birdnest anthropology is not right. sent5: if the ohmmeter is tubal the fact that the stitcher is non-cachectic thing that birdnests anthropology is incorrect. sent6: that the vardenafil is tubal hold if there is something such that it is not unintrusive and it is a kind of a nursery. sent7: the ohmmeter birdnests anthropology if there exists something such that that it is not a laxative but a quadratics is not true. sent8: the ohmmeter is elemental. sent9: there exists something such that it does not birdnest anthropology. sent10: if the ohmmeter birdnests anthropology that the stitcher is not cachectic and it is not elemental is not true. sent11: something is a kind of intrusive thing that is a nursery. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a laxative and it is cachectic then the stitcher is tubal. sent13: the stitcher is not elemental but it birdnests anthropology. sent14: the fact that the fact that the shanghaier does not strand onomatopoeia but it is cachectic is not correct is right. sent15: if something is not elemental it birdnests anthropology and/or is tubal. sent16: that that the vardenafil is cachectic thing that is not non-tubal does not hold is right. sent17: something is not elemental if it is cachectic thing that is unintrusive. sent18: that the vardenafil is not laxative and strands onomatopoeia is not right if the shanghaier is not non-tubal. sent19: the vardenafil does strand onomatopoeia if something does not birdnest anthropology and is not non-tubal. sent20: if that the stitcher is not cachectic and it is not elemental is incorrect then the shanghaier does not strand onomatopoeia. sent21: the stitcher is elemental if there exists something such that it is non-tubal thing that strands onomatopoeia. sent22: if the vardenafil is non-laxative but not non-quadratics then that it is not tubal hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vardenafil is not a laxative but it is quadratics.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the vardenafil is not tubal.; sent11 & sent6 -> int2: the vardenafil is tubal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the vardenafil is a kind of non-laxative thing that is a quadratics is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is non-laxative a quadratics is wrong.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the ohmmeter does birdnest anthropology.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the stitcher is both non-cachectic and non-elemental is not correct.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the shanghaier does strand onomatopoeia.
sent15 -> int8: if the vardenafil is not elemental it does birdnest anthropology and/or it is tubal.; sent17 -> int9: if the vardenafil is a kind of cachectic thing that is unintrusive it is not elemental.;
$hypothesis$ = the shanghaier does not strand onomatopoeia. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is elemental and it is a laxative is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that it is both not cachectic and not non-laxative the stitcher is tubal. sent3: the shanghaier is not elemental if it strands onomatopoeia and is not non-tubal. sent4: that the ohmmeter is a laxative and it does birdnest anthropology is not right. sent5: if the ohmmeter is tubal the fact that the stitcher is non-cachectic thing that birdnests anthropology is incorrect. sent6: that the vardenafil is tubal hold if there is something such that it is not unintrusive and it is a kind of a nursery. sent7: the ohmmeter birdnests anthropology if there exists something such that that it is not a laxative but a quadratics is not true. sent8: the ohmmeter is elemental. sent9: there exists something such that it does not birdnest anthropology. sent10: if the ohmmeter birdnests anthropology that the stitcher is not cachectic and it is not elemental is not true. sent11: something is a kind of intrusive thing that is a nursery. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a laxative and it is cachectic then the stitcher is tubal. sent13: the stitcher is not elemental but it birdnests anthropology. sent14: the fact that the fact that the shanghaier does not strand onomatopoeia but it is cachectic is not correct is right. sent15: if something is not elemental it birdnests anthropology and/or is tubal. sent16: that that the vardenafil is cachectic thing that is not non-tubal does not hold is right. sent17: something is not elemental if it is cachectic thing that is unintrusive. sent18: that the vardenafil is not laxative and strands onomatopoeia is not right if the shanghaier is not non-tubal. sent19: the vardenafil does strand onomatopoeia if something does not birdnest anthropology and is not non-tubal. sent20: if that the stitcher is not cachectic and it is not elemental is incorrect then the shanghaier does not strand onomatopoeia. sent21: the stitcher is elemental if there exists something such that it is non-tubal thing that strands onomatopoeia. sent22: if the vardenafil is non-laxative but not non-quadratics then that it is not tubal hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vardenafil is not a laxative but it is quadratics.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the vardenafil is not tubal.; sent11 & sent6 -> int2: the vardenafil is tubal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the vardenafil is a kind of non-laxative thing that is a quadratics is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is non-laxative a quadratics is wrong.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the ohmmeter does birdnest anthropology.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the stitcher is both non-cachectic and non-elemental is not correct.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__