the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-copular thing that syndicates is not true it does not impair is false.
sent1: if the fact that something is not a leer and is a kind of a peek is incorrect then it is acidotic. sent2: the eclair does not impair if that it is not Ambrosian and it does accrete LLM does not hold. sent3: if that the terrarium is not Thracian hold it does not impair. sent4: something does not impair if that it is not copular and it does syndicate does not hold. sent5: something is not a kind of a Aragon if that it does not broadside involution and does expire unionism is not true. sent6: that there is something such that if it is not a theanthropism and it is neuter then it does not broadside Carnegie is not wrong.
sent4 -> int1: the terrarium does not impair if the fact that it is not copular and it is a syndicate is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-copular thing that syndicates is not true it does not impair is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not a leer and is a kind of a peek is incorrect then it is acidotic. sent2: the eclair does not impair if that it is not Ambrosian and it does accrete LLM does not hold. sent3: if that the terrarium is not Thracian hold it does not impair. sent4: something does not impair if that it is not copular and it does syndicate does not hold. sent5: something is not a kind of a Aragon if that it does not broadside involution and does expire unionism is not true. sent6: that there is something such that if it is not a theanthropism and it is neuter then it does not broadside Carnegie is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the terrarium does not impair if the fact that it is not copular and it is a syndicate is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__