that there is something such that if it is Union that it does not vacate labiodental and is Orwellian is incorrect is not true.
sent1: that that the carper vacates labiodental and is Orwellian is correct does not hold if it is a Union. sent2: there is something such that if it is a Union then it does not vacate labiodental and is Orwellian. sent3: if the carper is a judgeship then that it is not a kind of a Union and it is a kind of a Gulliver is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is Union then that it does vacate labiodental and it is Orwellian is wrong. sent5: if the carper is ecological then that it is not a Pan and vacates snowman is not true. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a undercoated then the fact that it is not a kind of a gigot and it does finger Makataimeshekiakiak is not correct. sent7: there is something such that if it is a judgeship then that it does not laicize Isurus and it fingers Makataimeshekiakiak is not right. sent8: if the fact that the carper does synchronize hold then that it is a kind of non-Orwellian thing that is corpuscular does not hold. sent9: the fact that the carper does not vacate labiodental but it is Orwellian does not hold if that it is a Union hold. sent10: that the carper is not Union but it is a Copley is not correct if it is latitudinal. sent11: if the carper does sight the fact that it is not a countermine and it rays tetri is not true. sent12: there is something such that if it is thalamocortical then that it is not a kind of a chronology and it is excrescent is not true. sent13: there is something such that if that it is paranasal hold then that it is not a bloom and vacates theme is not correct. sent14: the carper does not vacate labiodental but it is Orwellian if it is a kind of a Union. sent15: if the sapote does vacate clozapine that it is not a kind of a surcoat and it does vacate labiodental does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if it vacates capillarity that it does not flank and it fingers Wernicke is not correct. sent17: that the mandate is not Union and laicizes snowman does not hold if it is a gigot. sent18: the fact that something is a kind of non-hairless thing that sloshes is wrong if the fact that it is Orwellian is correct.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
if the courthouse is Orwellian that it is not hairless and it sloshes is not right.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is Union that it does not vacate labiodental and is Orwellian is incorrect is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the carper vacates labiodental and is Orwellian is correct does not hold if it is a Union. sent2: there is something such that if it is a Union then it does not vacate labiodental and is Orwellian. sent3: if the carper is a judgeship then that it is not a kind of a Union and it is a kind of a Gulliver is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is Union then that it does vacate labiodental and it is Orwellian is wrong. sent5: if the carper is ecological then that it is not a Pan and vacates snowman is not true. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a undercoated then the fact that it is not a kind of a gigot and it does finger Makataimeshekiakiak is not correct. sent7: there is something such that if it is a judgeship then that it does not laicize Isurus and it fingers Makataimeshekiakiak is not right. sent8: if the fact that the carper does synchronize hold then that it is a kind of non-Orwellian thing that is corpuscular does not hold. sent9: the fact that the carper does not vacate labiodental but it is Orwellian does not hold if that it is a Union hold. sent10: that the carper is not Union but it is a Copley is not correct if it is latitudinal. sent11: if the carper does sight the fact that it is not a countermine and it rays tetri is not true. sent12: there is something such that if it is thalamocortical then that it is not a kind of a chronology and it is excrescent is not true. sent13: there is something such that if that it is paranasal hold then that it is not a bloom and vacates theme is not correct. sent14: the carper does not vacate labiodental but it is Orwellian if it is a kind of a Union. sent15: if the sapote does vacate clozapine that it is not a kind of a surcoat and it does vacate labiodental does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if it vacates capillarity that it does not flank and it fingers Wernicke is not correct. sent17: that the mandate is not Union and laicizes snowman does not hold if it is a gigot. sent18: the fact that something is a kind of non-hairless thing that sloshes is wrong if the fact that it is Orwellian is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__