the gusher does not splat peridotite.
sent1: that the Angus is a margarine and it is a put-down is false. sent2: if the ignoramus splats parthenocarpy and it is unimpressionable it prefigures. sent3: the Angus is not virtuous but it is a margarine. sent4: the ignoramus does not splat parthenocarpy. sent5: if something that does not splat parthenocarpy is unimpressionable it does prefigure. sent6: the ignoramus does not splat peridotite if the fact that the gusher is a Sunbelt that does prefigure is not true. sent7: if something is a Sunbelt that it is not virtuous hold. sent8: if something does not prefigure then it does not splat parthenocarpy. sent9: the Ofo is not uneventful if that it does not witness and it is a ductility does not hold. sent10: the gusher is a kind of a Sunbelt. sent11: if there is something such that that it is empirical and it is a put-down is not true then the newsreader is not a kind of a put-down. sent12: the newsreader is a setting. sent13: that the pulley is a kind of a put-down does not hold if that the Angus is a margarine that is extraterritorial is wrong. sent14: if the fact that something is virtuous and is not extraterritorial is not right then it is not virtuous. sent15: if something does prefigure and splats parthenocarpy then it splats peridotite. sent16: the fact that the Ofo does not witness but it is a kind of a ductility is not true. sent17: if the ignoramus is non-virtuous that that the Angus is a margarine and it is not non-extraterritorial is incorrect is not incorrect. sent18: the fact that the Angus is a kind of virtuous thing that is not extraterritorial does not hold if the pulley is a margarine. sent19: the ecrevisse is not extraterritorial. sent20: the Angus does not prefigure if the ignoramus is not a margarine. sent21: there exists something such that it is not extraterritorial or it is not a margarine or both. sent22: if the Ofo is not uneventful then that the chipotle is empirical and it is a put-down is incorrect. sent23: that everything does not splat parthenocarpy is not wrong. sent24: everything does not splat parthenocarpy and it is unimpressionable. sent25: if the pulley is not a put-down then the gusher does not splat peridotite. sent26: if something that splats peridotite is virtuous then it is a kind of a Sunbelt.
sent24 -> int1: the ignoramus does not splat parthenocarpy but it is unimpressionable.; sent5 -> int2: the ignoramus does prefigure if it does not splat parthenocarpy and is unimpressionable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ignoramus does prefigure is right.; sent7 -> int4: if the ignoramus is a kind of a Sunbelt it is not virtuous.;
the gusher splats peridotite.
sent14 -> int5: if that the Angus is virtuous but it is not extraterritorial is wrong then that it is not virtuous hold.; sent9 & sent16 -> int6: the Ofo is not uneventful.; sent22 & int6 -> int7: that the chipotle is not non-empirical and it is a put-down is not right.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is both empirical and a put-down is not true.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the newsreader is not a kind of a put-down.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the newsreader is not a put-down but it does set.; int10 -> int11: something is not a put-down and is a setting.;
$hypothesis$ = the gusher does not splat peridotite. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Angus is a margarine and it is a put-down is false. sent2: if the ignoramus splats parthenocarpy and it is unimpressionable it prefigures. sent3: the Angus is not virtuous but it is a margarine. sent4: the ignoramus does not splat parthenocarpy. sent5: if something that does not splat parthenocarpy is unimpressionable it does prefigure. sent6: the ignoramus does not splat peridotite if the fact that the gusher is a Sunbelt that does prefigure is not true. sent7: if something is a Sunbelt that it is not virtuous hold. sent8: if something does not prefigure then it does not splat parthenocarpy. sent9: the Ofo is not uneventful if that it does not witness and it is a ductility does not hold. sent10: the gusher is a kind of a Sunbelt. sent11: if there is something such that that it is empirical and it is a put-down is not true then the newsreader is not a kind of a put-down. sent12: the newsreader is a setting. sent13: that the pulley is a kind of a put-down does not hold if that the Angus is a margarine that is extraterritorial is wrong. sent14: if the fact that something is virtuous and is not extraterritorial is not right then it is not virtuous. sent15: if something does prefigure and splats parthenocarpy then it splats peridotite. sent16: the fact that the Ofo does not witness but it is a kind of a ductility is not true. sent17: if the ignoramus is non-virtuous that that the Angus is a margarine and it is not non-extraterritorial is incorrect is not incorrect. sent18: the fact that the Angus is a kind of virtuous thing that is not extraterritorial does not hold if the pulley is a margarine. sent19: the ecrevisse is not extraterritorial. sent20: the Angus does not prefigure if the ignoramus is not a margarine. sent21: there exists something such that it is not extraterritorial or it is not a margarine or both. sent22: if the Ofo is not uneventful then that the chipotle is empirical and it is a put-down is incorrect. sent23: that everything does not splat parthenocarpy is not wrong. sent24: everything does not splat parthenocarpy and it is unimpressionable. sent25: if the pulley is not a put-down then the gusher does not splat peridotite. sent26: if something that splats peridotite is virtuous then it is a kind of a Sunbelt. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 -> int1: the ignoramus does not splat parthenocarpy but it is unimpressionable.; sent5 -> int2: the ignoramus does prefigure if it does not splat parthenocarpy and is unimpressionable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ignoramus does prefigure is right.; sent7 -> int4: if the ignoramus is a kind of a Sunbelt it is not virtuous.; __UNKNOWN__