there is something such that if it is a Catullus then that that it does lug and it is not a kind of a Hindu is right is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Catullus the fact that it is a lug and it is a Hindu is wrong. sent2: if the thermal is a Catullus the fact that it is a lug and it is a kind of a Hindu is not right. sent3: if something flays then it does compromise immigration and it is not an isthmus. sent4: if the thermal is a kind of a Catullus it is a lug and it is not a kind of a Hindu. sent5: that if that something does compromise Permic hold that it does broaden and it is not true-false is not correct is right. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Catullus it does lug and it is non-Hindu. sent7: if the cardsharp compromises jelly then it is a Trondheim and it does not quiver shutter. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of a cemetery and it is a kind of a Lutheranism is not true if it is a Maputo. sent9: if something is a Catullus that it is a lug and it is not a kind of a Hindu is wrong. sent10: the fact that something is a lug and it is a Hindu is incorrect if it is a Catullus. sent11: there is something such that if it does complete then the fact that it does compromise antinode and does not accelerate key is wrong. sent12: if the dominus is a kind of a lug then that it is absorbable thing that is not a laureled is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a deference it is a kind of acroscopic thing that is not a cart. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a supremo then the fact that it quivers brew and is not a Somme is incorrect. sent15: that that something does compromise subdivider and it is Aboriginal is right does not hold if it is a kind of a tantalum. sent16: the fact that something is Episcopal but it is not atonalistic is not correct if it is siliceous. sent17: there is something such that if it does ambush IBDA-C the fact that it is a procrastination but not a meshed is not true. sent18: if something does acknowledge then that it is a kind of undiplomatic thing that is a Djanet does not hold. sent19: something that is a Catullus is both a lug and not a Hindu.
sent9 -> int1: that that the thermal is a kind of a lug but it is not a kind of a Hindu is false is true if it is a Catullus.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is siliceous then the fact that it is Episcopal and it is not atonalistic is not true.
sent16 -> int2: that the messmate is Episcopal but it is not atonalistic does not hold if it is siliceous.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a Catullus then that that it does lug and it is not a kind of a Hindu is right is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Catullus the fact that it is a lug and it is a Hindu is wrong. sent2: if the thermal is a Catullus the fact that it is a lug and it is a kind of a Hindu is not right. sent3: if something flays then it does compromise immigration and it is not an isthmus. sent4: if the thermal is a kind of a Catullus it is a lug and it is not a kind of a Hindu. sent5: that if that something does compromise Permic hold that it does broaden and it is not true-false is not correct is right. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Catullus it does lug and it is non-Hindu. sent7: if the cardsharp compromises jelly then it is a Trondheim and it does not quiver shutter. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of a cemetery and it is a kind of a Lutheranism is not true if it is a Maputo. sent9: if something is a Catullus that it is a lug and it is not a kind of a Hindu is wrong. sent10: the fact that something is a lug and it is a Hindu is incorrect if it is a Catullus. sent11: there is something such that if it does complete then the fact that it does compromise antinode and does not accelerate key is wrong. sent12: if the dominus is a kind of a lug then that it is absorbable thing that is not a laureled is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a deference it is a kind of acroscopic thing that is not a cart. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a supremo then the fact that it quivers brew and is not a Somme is incorrect. sent15: that that something does compromise subdivider and it is Aboriginal is right does not hold if it is a kind of a tantalum. sent16: the fact that something is Episcopal but it is not atonalistic is not correct if it is siliceous. sent17: there is something such that if it does ambush IBDA-C the fact that it is a procrastination but not a meshed is not true. sent18: if something does acknowledge then that it is a kind of undiplomatic thing that is a Djanet does not hold. sent19: something that is a Catullus is both a lug and not a Hindu. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that that the thermal is a kind of a lug but it is not a kind of a Hindu is false is true if it is a Catullus.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__