that the light is thalloid hold.
sent1: The Charlottetown means khesari. sent2: the fact that something is non-evolutionary thing that does not pole light is incorrect if it does mean Charlottetown. sent3: if a non-evolutionary thing is not an ordered then it does mean Charlottetown. sent4: if the cyprinodont is not evolutionary then the khesari is non-evolutionary thing that does not pole light. sent5: if the cyprinodont is not thalloid the light is not thalloid. sent6: if the cyprinodont is an ordered then the light is thalloid. sent7: if the cyprinodont is not an ordered then that it does not gong padlock and it skimps is incorrect. sent8: the khesari means Charlottetown. sent9: if the khesari is evolutionary then the cyprinodont is not thalloid but it orders. sent10: if the fact that the cyprinodont does not gong padlock and does skimp is false then it is not evolutionary.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cyprinodont is not an ordered.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the cyprinodont does not gong padlock and does skimp is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the cyprinodont is non-evolutionary hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the khesari is not evolutionary and it does not pole light.; sent2 -> int4: if the khesari means Charlottetown that it is non-evolutionary thing that does not pole light is not right.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that that the khesari is not evolutionary and it does not pole light hold does not hold.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the cyprinodont orders.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the light is non-thalloid.
$hypothesis$ = that the light is thalloid hold. ; $context$ = sent1: The Charlottetown means khesari. sent2: the fact that something is non-evolutionary thing that does not pole light is incorrect if it does mean Charlottetown. sent3: if a non-evolutionary thing is not an ordered then it does mean Charlottetown. sent4: if the cyprinodont is not evolutionary then the khesari is non-evolutionary thing that does not pole light. sent5: if the cyprinodont is not thalloid the light is not thalloid. sent6: if the cyprinodont is an ordered then the light is thalloid. sent7: if the cyprinodont is not an ordered then that it does not gong padlock and it skimps is incorrect. sent8: the khesari means Charlottetown. sent9: if the khesari is evolutionary then the cyprinodont is not thalloid but it orders. sent10: if the fact that the cyprinodont does not gong padlock and does skimp is false then it is not evolutionary. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cyprinodont is not an ordered.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the cyprinodont does not gong padlock and does skimp is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the cyprinodont is non-evolutionary hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the khesari is not evolutionary and it does not pole light.; sent2 -> int4: if the khesari means Charlottetown that it is non-evolutionary thing that does not pole light is not right.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the fact that that the khesari is not evolutionary and it does not pole light hold does not hold.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the cyprinodont orders.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__