the marble does muff pollard.
sent1: if the loss does not muff pollard and is not a mission then the marble does muff pollard. sent2: if something that is a development is a kind of a mission the marble does not muff pollard. sent3: the potato destains dimension. sent4: that something is not a development but it is metallurgical is not true if the fact that it does skedaddle hold. sent5: something is not anemic if the fact that it does not destain tripletail and is a kind of a sonograph is not correct. sent6: something does not muff pollard if the fact that it is not a development and it is metallurgical does not hold. sent7: if the loss is not a development then the pinon does not muff millerite and it is not an allied. sent8: if the fact that something does not dust and does not destain dimension is not correct the fact that it is not a mission is correct. sent9: if the fact that something is not fragrant hold it is not a kind of a forward and it does not wrap. sent10: if something is not a kind of a development then the fact that it is not a brewing and not metallurgical does not hold. sent11: there is nothing such that it is a Negaprion and it is an illegitimacy. sent12: if the marble does not wrap the fact that the pinon is not feminist or is a skedaddle or both is false. sent13: if the fact that the fact that something is a Negaprion and is a kind of an illegitimacy is right does not hold then it is not fragrant. sent14: that the potato is a kind of non-pistillate thing that does not destain Cochran is not right if the hypo is not anemic. sent15: the loss is a mission if the potato is a skedaddle. sent16: the goffer is not a mission and not a development if the loss does not muff pollard. sent17: that the loss is a mission if the potato is metallurgical is true. sent18: that the pinon does not muff millerite and it is not a kind of an allied is not correct. sent19: the fact that the hypo does not destain tripletail and is a kind of a sonograph is wrong. sent20: the loss is feminist thing that does skedaddle if there exists something such that the fact that it does not wrap hold. sent21: if something does not destain Cochran then that it does not dust and it does not destain dimension does not hold. sent22: either the potato is a kind of a skedaddle or it is metallurgical or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the loss is not a development.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the pinon does not muff millerite and is not an allied.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the loss is a development.; sent22 & sent15 & sent17 -> int4: the loss is a kind of a mission.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the loss is a development and it is a mission.; int5 -> int6: something is a kind of a development and it is a mission.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the marble muffs pollard.
sent6 -> int7: if that the loss is not a development but metallurgical does not hold it does not muff pollard.; sent9 -> int8: if the falangist is not fragrant it is non-forward thing that is not a wrap.; sent13 -> int9: if that the Reaper is both a Negaprion and an illegitimacy is incorrect then it is not fragrant.; sent11 -> int10: the fact that the Reaper is a Negaprion and it is an illegitimacy does not hold.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Reaper is not fragrant.; int11 -> int12: everything is not fragrant.; int12 -> int13: the falangist is not fragrant.; int8 & int13 -> int14: the falangist is a kind of non-forward thing that is not a wrap.; int14 -> int15: everything is not forward and it is not a kind of a wrap.; int15 -> int16: the pinon is non-forward and not a wrap.; int16 -> int17: the pinon is not a wrap.; int17 -> int18: something is not a wrap.; int18 & sent20 -> int19: the loss is both a feminist and a skedaddle.; int19 -> int20: the loss does skedaddle.; sent4 -> int21: the fact that the loss is not a kind of a development but it is metallurgical does not hold if it is a kind of a skedaddle.; int20 & int21 -> int22: that the loss is not a development but it is metallurgical is not right.; int7 & int22 -> int23: the loss does not muff pollard.; sent8 -> int24: if the fact that the loss is not a dust and does not destain dimension does not hold it is not a kind of a mission.; sent21 -> int25: if the loss does not destain Cochran then the fact that it does not dust and it does not destain dimension is not right.; sent5 -> int26: the hypo is not anemic if the fact that it does not destain tripletail and it is a sonograph is wrong.; int26 & sent19 -> int27: the hypo is not anemic.; sent14 & int27 -> int28: the fact that the potato is not pistillate and it does not destain Cochran does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the marble does muff pollard. ; $context$ = sent1: if the loss does not muff pollard and is not a mission then the marble does muff pollard. sent2: if something that is a development is a kind of a mission the marble does not muff pollard. sent3: the potato destains dimension. sent4: that something is not a development but it is metallurgical is not true if the fact that it does skedaddle hold. sent5: something is not anemic if the fact that it does not destain tripletail and is a kind of a sonograph is not correct. sent6: something does not muff pollard if the fact that it is not a development and it is metallurgical does not hold. sent7: if the loss is not a development then the pinon does not muff millerite and it is not an allied. sent8: if the fact that something does not dust and does not destain dimension is not correct the fact that it is not a mission is correct. sent9: if the fact that something is not fragrant hold it is not a kind of a forward and it does not wrap. sent10: if something is not a kind of a development then the fact that it is not a brewing and not metallurgical does not hold. sent11: there is nothing such that it is a Negaprion and it is an illegitimacy. sent12: if the marble does not wrap the fact that the pinon is not feminist or is a skedaddle or both is false. sent13: if the fact that the fact that something is a Negaprion and is a kind of an illegitimacy is right does not hold then it is not fragrant. sent14: that the potato is a kind of non-pistillate thing that does not destain Cochran is not right if the hypo is not anemic. sent15: the loss is a mission if the potato is a skedaddle. sent16: the goffer is not a mission and not a development if the loss does not muff pollard. sent17: that the loss is a mission if the potato is metallurgical is true. sent18: that the pinon does not muff millerite and it is not a kind of an allied is not correct. sent19: the fact that the hypo does not destain tripletail and is a kind of a sonograph is wrong. sent20: the loss is feminist thing that does skedaddle if there exists something such that the fact that it does not wrap hold. sent21: if something does not destain Cochran then that it does not dust and it does not destain dimension does not hold. sent22: either the potato is a kind of a skedaddle or it is metallurgical or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the loss is not a development.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the pinon does not muff millerite and is not an allied.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the loss is a development.; sent22 & sent15 & sent17 -> int4: the loss is a kind of a mission.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the loss is a development and it is a mission.; int5 -> int6: something is a kind of a development and it is a mission.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__