the unpropitiousness does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that not the cloying girandole but the mastoidectomy occurs does not hold the mastoidectomy does not occur. sent2: that the English happens and the cloying girandole happens is triggered by that the enforcement does not occur. sent3: the incoherentness and the mastoidectomy occurs. sent4: if the vaginalness does not occur then both the clonus and the erectness occurs. sent5: if the incoherentness happens the painfulness occurs. sent6: if that the biotiticness occurs is correct then the approbating pageboy does not occur and the satisfaction does not occur. sent7: that both the unpropitiousness and the incoherentness occurs is brought about by that the mastoidectomy does not occur. sent8: if the English occurs then the fact that the mastoidectomy happens or the unpropitiousness does not occur or both is not wrong. sent9: if the satisfaction does not occur the fact that the baccarat does not occur but the Frenching happens does not hold. sent10: the non-rentalness results in that both the gymnasticsness and the facility occurs. sent11: if the mastoidectomy happens the unpropitiousness does not occur and the English happens. sent12: the biotiticness happens if the approbating Huss happens. sent13: if the clonus happens then the truancy occurs. sent14: that the approbating Huss does not occur is prevented by that the truancy occurs. sent15: the enforcement does not occur if the facility happens. sent16: the rentalness does not occur if that the baccarat does not occur and the French occurs is wrong.
sent3 -> int1: that the mastoidectomy occurs hold.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the unpropitiousness does not occur and the Englishness occurs.; int2 -> hypothesis;
the unpropitiousness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the unpropitiousness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that not the cloying girandole but the mastoidectomy occurs does not hold the mastoidectomy does not occur. sent2: that the English happens and the cloying girandole happens is triggered by that the enforcement does not occur. sent3: the incoherentness and the mastoidectomy occurs. sent4: if the vaginalness does not occur then both the clonus and the erectness occurs. sent5: if the incoherentness happens the painfulness occurs. sent6: if that the biotiticness occurs is correct then the approbating pageboy does not occur and the satisfaction does not occur. sent7: that both the unpropitiousness and the incoherentness occurs is brought about by that the mastoidectomy does not occur. sent8: if the English occurs then the fact that the mastoidectomy happens or the unpropitiousness does not occur or both is not wrong. sent9: if the satisfaction does not occur the fact that the baccarat does not occur but the Frenching happens does not hold. sent10: the non-rentalness results in that both the gymnasticsness and the facility occurs. sent11: if the mastoidectomy happens the unpropitiousness does not occur and the English happens. sent12: the biotiticness happens if the approbating Huss happens. sent13: if the clonus happens then the truancy occurs. sent14: that the approbating Huss does not occur is prevented by that the truancy occurs. sent15: the enforcement does not occur if the facility happens. sent16: the rentalness does not occur if that the baccarat does not occur and the French occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that the mastoidectomy occurs hold.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the unpropitiousness does not occur and the Englishness occurs.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__