that that the Nauruan either is a kind of a whitewashed or does not tip Munch or both is not right is not wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the footbridge does not tip Munch is true then the peptide does not tip Munch. sent2: if the Munch does not tip Munch the fact that either the Nauruan is a whitewashed or it does not tip Munch or both is incorrect. sent3: the diaphoretic is a acrylamide but not a existentialist. sent4: the footbridge does not tip Munch if the fact that the Munch is hemic thing that does tip Munch is incorrect. sent5: if that the diaphoretic does not harvest vandalism and is coccal is wrong the fact that the Nauruan is not hemic is not false. sent6: something does harvest vandalism and it is a whitewashed if it is not hemic. sent7: something is coccal if it tips argumentation. sent8: if the footbridge harvests vandalism and/or it is not hemic then it is not coccal. sent9: if the diaphoretic is a kind of a acrylamide that is not a existentialist then that the footbridge tips argumentation is correct. sent10: the Munch does not tip Munch if there exists something such that it does not harvest sorrow and is not affixal. sent11: the footbridge is not hemic if the fact that it does not harvest sorrow and is not affixal is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the footbridge does not harvest sorrow and is non-affixal is false.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the footbridge is not hemic.; int1 -> int2: the footbridge harvests vandalism or is not hemic or both.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the footbridge is not coccal.; sent7 -> int4: the footbridge is coccal if it tips argumentation.; sent9 & sent3 -> int5: the footbridge does tip argumentation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the footbridge is coccal.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the footbridge does not harvest sorrow and is not affixal.; int8 -> int9: something does not harvest sorrow and is not affixal.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: that the Munch does not tip Munch is correct.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the Nauruan either is a whitewashed or does not tip Munch or both.
sent6 -> int11: the Nauruan does harvest vandalism and does whitewash if it is non-hemic.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the Nauruan either is a kind of a whitewashed or does not tip Munch or both is not right is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the footbridge does not tip Munch is true then the peptide does not tip Munch. sent2: if the Munch does not tip Munch the fact that either the Nauruan is a whitewashed or it does not tip Munch or both is incorrect. sent3: the diaphoretic is a acrylamide but not a existentialist. sent4: the footbridge does not tip Munch if the fact that the Munch is hemic thing that does tip Munch is incorrect. sent5: if that the diaphoretic does not harvest vandalism and is coccal is wrong the fact that the Nauruan is not hemic is not false. sent6: something does harvest vandalism and it is a whitewashed if it is not hemic. sent7: something is coccal if it tips argumentation. sent8: if the footbridge harvests vandalism and/or it is not hemic then it is not coccal. sent9: if the diaphoretic is a kind of a acrylamide that is not a existentialist then that the footbridge tips argumentation is correct. sent10: the Munch does not tip Munch if there exists something such that it does not harvest sorrow and is not affixal. sent11: the footbridge is not hemic if the fact that it does not harvest sorrow and is not affixal is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the footbridge does not harvest sorrow and is non-affixal is false.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the footbridge is not hemic.; int1 -> int2: the footbridge harvests vandalism or is not hemic or both.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the footbridge is not coccal.; sent7 -> int4: the footbridge is coccal if it tips argumentation.; sent9 & sent3 -> int5: the footbridge does tip argumentation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the footbridge is coccal.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the footbridge does not harvest sorrow and is not affixal.; int8 -> int9: something does not harvest sorrow and is not affixal.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: that the Munch does not tip Munch is correct.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__