the antineutrino is not intrauterine.
sent1: the elastase is intrauterine if the Western is not intrauterine. sent2: if the fact that the Western is a narrow is true then the fact that it is a Hamilton and it is a kind of a feist is not true. sent3: if that the bagman does finish dukedom is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of a Jacksonville and it is a Hamilton does not hold. sent4: that the antineutrino finishes minister and is not a feist is false if the landscaper is a kind of a feist. sent5: the fact that the clinometer is achondroplastic is right if there exists something such that the fact that it is unacquisitive and it is a kind of a foray is not correct. sent6: if the landscaper is a feist the fact that the antineutrino does not finish minister and it is not a feist does not hold. sent7: if there exists something such that it finishes dukedom then that the bagman does not moralize and is intrauterine is false. sent8: if something is trustful then it is postmodernist. sent9: if the Western either is not restless or is non-narrow or both then it does moralize. sent10: if the fact that the bagman is not a Jacksonville but it is a Hamilton is incorrect the elastase is a step. sent11: the Western does not moralize. sent12: the clinometer does finish whistling. sent13: if something does not finish minister and is a feist it steps. sent14: if something is a step then the landscaper is not a kind of a Jacksonville but it is a Hamilton. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the clinometer does fragment inelasticity and is not a scallopine is not wrong is wrong it is a scallopine. sent16: if something is achondroplastic then that it fragments inelasticity and it is not a scallopine is wrong. sent17: if that the Western is not restless and/or it is not a narrow is not right then the bagman finishes dukedom. sent18: if something finishes dukedom then it is intrauterine. sent19: the landscaper is a kind of a feist if the elastase steps. sent20: that the Western is restless is correct. sent21: if the bagman is not a feist then it is a kind of a Hamilton that does step. sent22: the bagman is not a kind of a feist. sent23: if that the bagman does not moralize but it is intrauterine does not hold the Western is not intrauterine. sent24: the fact that the clog is unacquisitive and is a foray is not right. sent25: if the bassoonist is postmodernist then the antineutrino does not finish minister but it is a feist.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Western is not restless and/or it is not a narrow.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Western does moralize.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Western is not restless and/or is not a narrow is not correct.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the bagman does finish dukedom.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the bagman is not a kind of a Jacksonville and is a Hamilton is wrong.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the elastase does step.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the landscaper is a feist.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: that the antineutrino does not finish minister and it is not a feist is not right.;
the antineutrino is intrauterine.
sent18 -> int9: the antineutrino is intrauterine if it finishes dukedom.; sent21 & sent22 -> int10: the bagman is a Hamilton and a step.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the bagman is a Hamilton is not false.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is a Hamilton.;
$hypothesis$ = the antineutrino is not intrauterine. ; $context$ = sent1: the elastase is intrauterine if the Western is not intrauterine. sent2: if the fact that the Western is a narrow is true then the fact that it is a Hamilton and it is a kind of a feist is not true. sent3: if that the bagman does finish dukedom is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of a Jacksonville and it is a Hamilton does not hold. sent4: that the antineutrino finishes minister and is not a feist is false if the landscaper is a kind of a feist. sent5: the fact that the clinometer is achondroplastic is right if there exists something such that the fact that it is unacquisitive and it is a kind of a foray is not correct. sent6: if the landscaper is a feist the fact that the antineutrino does not finish minister and it is not a feist does not hold. sent7: if there exists something such that it finishes dukedom then that the bagman does not moralize and is intrauterine is false. sent8: if something is trustful then it is postmodernist. sent9: if the Western either is not restless or is non-narrow or both then it does moralize. sent10: if the fact that the bagman is not a Jacksonville but it is a Hamilton is incorrect the elastase is a step. sent11: the Western does not moralize. sent12: the clinometer does finish whistling. sent13: if something does not finish minister and is a feist it steps. sent14: if something is a step then the landscaper is not a kind of a Jacksonville but it is a Hamilton. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the clinometer does fragment inelasticity and is not a scallopine is not wrong is wrong it is a scallopine. sent16: if something is achondroplastic then that it fragments inelasticity and it is not a scallopine is wrong. sent17: if that the Western is not restless and/or it is not a narrow is not right then the bagman finishes dukedom. sent18: if something finishes dukedom then it is intrauterine. sent19: the landscaper is a kind of a feist if the elastase steps. sent20: that the Western is restless is correct. sent21: if the bagman is not a feist then it is a kind of a Hamilton that does step. sent22: the bagman is not a kind of a feist. sent23: if that the bagman does not moralize but it is intrauterine does not hold the Western is not intrauterine. sent24: the fact that the clog is unacquisitive and is a foray is not right. sent25: if the bassoonist is postmodernist then the antineutrino does not finish minister but it is a feist. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Western is not restless and/or it is not a narrow.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Western does moralize.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Western is not restless and/or is not a narrow is not correct.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the bagman does finish dukedom.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the bagman is not a kind of a Jacksonville and is a Hamilton is wrong.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the elastase does step.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the landscaper is a feist.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: that the antineutrino does not finish minister and it is not a feist is not right.; __UNKNOWN__