the fact that something is not prudent is not correct.
sent1: if that the chimaera does not sensualize haying and it is not a tenement is not true then the spritzer is not prudent. sent2: the avenger does not mask Nimrod but it is enolic if something does not sensualize haying. sent3: that something is not a shaping and it is not acronymic is false if it does not mask pharmacologist. sent4: the collagen is not a shaping but non-acronymic if the fact that the telecommunication is not sexagesimal hold. sent5: The pharmacologist does not mask collagen. sent6: there exists something such that it is sexagesimal. sent7: the telecommunication does not interrupt if there is something such that that it does sensualize haying and is not a kind of a tenement is false. sent8: the telecommunication is not sexagesimal if there is something such that it does not mask Nimrod and is enolic. sent9: the collagen does not mask pharmacologist. sent10: if the fact that the telecommunication is both imprudent and not sexagesimal is false that the spritzer does not mask pharmacologist is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chimaera does not sensualize haying and is not a kind of a tenement.; assump1 -> int1: the chimaera does not sensualize haying.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not sensualize haying.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the avenger does not mask Nimrod but it is enolic.; int3 -> int4: something does not mask Nimrod but it is enolic.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the telecommunication is not sexagesimal.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the collagen does not shape and is not acronymic.; sent3 -> int7: if the collagen does not mask pharmacologist the fact that it does not shape and it is not acronymic is incorrect.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the collagen does not shape and is not acronymic does not hold.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the chimaera does not sensualize haying and is not a kind of a tenement is wrong.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the spritzer is not prudent.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the telecommunication is not an interrupt.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is not prudent is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the chimaera does not sensualize haying and it is not a tenement is not true then the spritzer is not prudent. sent2: the avenger does not mask Nimrod but it is enolic if something does not sensualize haying. sent3: that something is not a shaping and it is not acronymic is false if it does not mask pharmacologist. sent4: the collagen is not a shaping but non-acronymic if the fact that the telecommunication is not sexagesimal hold. sent5: The pharmacologist does not mask collagen. sent6: there exists something such that it is sexagesimal. sent7: the telecommunication does not interrupt if there is something such that that it does sensualize haying and is not a kind of a tenement is false. sent8: the telecommunication is not sexagesimal if there is something such that it does not mask Nimrod and is enolic. sent9: the collagen does not mask pharmacologist. sent10: if the fact that the telecommunication is both imprudent and not sexagesimal is false that the spritzer does not mask pharmacologist is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chimaera does not sensualize haying and is not a kind of a tenement.; assump1 -> int1: the chimaera does not sensualize haying.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not sensualize haying.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the avenger does not mask Nimrod but it is enolic.; int3 -> int4: something does not mask Nimrod but it is enolic.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the telecommunication is not sexagesimal.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the collagen does not shape and is not acronymic.; sent3 -> int7: if the collagen does not mask pharmacologist the fact that it does not shape and it is not acronymic is incorrect.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the collagen does not shape and is not acronymic does not hold.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the chimaera does not sensualize haying and is not a kind of a tenement is wrong.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the spritzer is not prudent.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__