the fact that if the low-techness occurs the clout happens but the incredulousness does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: the grubbing faithlessness does not occur. sent2: the bootleg occurs if the fact that the sweet but not the bootleg occurs is not right. sent3: the carelessness does not occur if the tuition happens and the topping stampede happens. sent4: the unionization happens. sent5: if that the conscription happens but the clouting does not occur does not hold the clouting happens. sent6: the fact that the fact that the conscription happens and the clout does not occur is incorrect is right. sent7: the ostealness occurs if that the haircut but not the ostealness happens does not hold. sent8: the topping Energy but not the ribbing happens if the malting Dari occurs. sent9: both the pitying and the grubbing sword occurs. sent10: the pitying occurs. sent11: both the nonadhesiveness and the non-Tudorness occurs. sent12: the fact that the conscription happens and the clout happens does not hold. sent13: the topping shortness does not occur if the grubbing exhibit happens and the uricosuricness happens. sent14: if the bifurcation happens and the sighing happens the topping Tyne does not occur. sent15: the fact that the candlelight occurs but the topping sonogram does not occur is not right. sent16: the fact that if the efficientness occurs then the brim occurs and the grubbing limnology does not occur is right. sent17: if both the grubbing sword and the low-techness occurs then the incredulousness does not occur.
sent9 -> int1: the grubbing sword occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the low-techness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the grubbing sword occurs and the low-techness happens.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the incredulousness does not occur.; sent5 & sent6 -> int4: the clouting happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: both the clouting and the non-incredulousness occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the low-techness occurs the clout happens but the incredulousness does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the grubbing faithlessness does not occur. sent2: the bootleg occurs if the fact that the sweet but not the bootleg occurs is not right. sent3: the carelessness does not occur if the tuition happens and the topping stampede happens. sent4: the unionization happens. sent5: if that the conscription happens but the clouting does not occur does not hold the clouting happens. sent6: the fact that the fact that the conscription happens and the clout does not occur is incorrect is right. sent7: the ostealness occurs if that the haircut but not the ostealness happens does not hold. sent8: the topping Energy but not the ribbing happens if the malting Dari occurs. sent9: both the pitying and the grubbing sword occurs. sent10: the pitying occurs. sent11: both the nonadhesiveness and the non-Tudorness occurs. sent12: the fact that the conscription happens and the clout happens does not hold. sent13: the topping shortness does not occur if the grubbing exhibit happens and the uricosuricness happens. sent14: if the bifurcation happens and the sighing happens the topping Tyne does not occur. sent15: the fact that the candlelight occurs but the topping sonogram does not occur is not right. sent16: the fact that if the efficientness occurs then the brim occurs and the grubbing limnology does not occur is right. sent17: if both the grubbing sword and the low-techness occurs then the incredulousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the grubbing sword occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the low-techness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the grubbing sword occurs and the low-techness happens.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the incredulousness does not occur.; sent5 & sent6 -> int4: the clouting happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: both the clouting and the non-incredulousness occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__