the fact that if the misconduct occurs then the unfreeness occurs is false.
sent1: the fact that the containment does not occur hold. sent2: the fact that the eluting shallu does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if that the nonfinancialness occurs is not wrong then the recitation happens. sent4: the benzylicness happens. sent5: the caning meloid happens and the containment does not occur. sent6: if the emmetropicness does not occur and the looming malabsorption does not occur then the fact that the taming occurs is correct. sent7: if the emmetropicness occurs and the looming malabsorption does not occur the taming happens. sent8: that the nonfinancialness does not occur causes that the benzylicness and the looming holism happens. sent9: if that both the assassination and the twit occurs is incorrect then the assassination does not occur. sent10: the prelim does not occur. sent11: the emmetropicness does not occur if the assassination does not occur. sent12: the drinking occurs. sent13: the emmetropicness does not occur and the looming malabsorption does not occur if the assassination does not occur. sent14: if the recitation happens then the Sothoness occurs. sent15: the emmetropicness does not occur. sent16: if the caning sniper does not occur the Defense does not occur. sent17: both the phenotypicalness and the non-secularness happens. sent18: that the assassination and the twit occurs does not hold. sent19: that both the Sothoness and the misconduct happens prevents the caning finch. sent20: the benzylicness happens and the nonfinancialness happens. sent21: the grizzle happens. sent22: if that the bust but not the caning farmhouse occurs is not incorrect the fact that the caning flicker happens is not incorrect. sent23: the misconduct happens and the sleepover occurs. sent24: the caning meloid occurs. sent25: that the unfreeness occurs is triggered by that the taming occurs but the caning finch does not occur.
sent20 -> int1: the nonfinancialness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the recitation occurs.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Sotho happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the misconduct happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the Sothoness happens and the misconduct occurs.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the caning finch does not occur.; sent9 & sent18 -> int6: the assassination does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the emmetropicness does not occur and the looming malabsorption does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the tamedness occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the tamedness happens and the caning finch does not occur.; int9 & sent25 -> int10: the unfreeness occurs.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the looming holism occurs and the sleepover happens.
sent23 -> int11: the sleepover occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the misconduct occurs then the unfreeness occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the containment does not occur hold. sent2: the fact that the eluting shallu does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if that the nonfinancialness occurs is not wrong then the recitation happens. sent4: the benzylicness happens. sent5: the caning meloid happens and the containment does not occur. sent6: if the emmetropicness does not occur and the looming malabsorption does not occur then the fact that the taming occurs is correct. sent7: if the emmetropicness occurs and the looming malabsorption does not occur the taming happens. sent8: that the nonfinancialness does not occur causes that the benzylicness and the looming holism happens. sent9: if that both the assassination and the twit occurs is incorrect then the assassination does not occur. sent10: the prelim does not occur. sent11: the emmetropicness does not occur if the assassination does not occur. sent12: the drinking occurs. sent13: the emmetropicness does not occur and the looming malabsorption does not occur if the assassination does not occur. sent14: if the recitation happens then the Sothoness occurs. sent15: the emmetropicness does not occur. sent16: if the caning sniper does not occur the Defense does not occur. sent17: both the phenotypicalness and the non-secularness happens. sent18: that the assassination and the twit occurs does not hold. sent19: that both the Sothoness and the misconduct happens prevents the caning finch. sent20: the benzylicness happens and the nonfinancialness happens. sent21: the grizzle happens. sent22: if that the bust but not the caning farmhouse occurs is not incorrect the fact that the caning flicker happens is not incorrect. sent23: the misconduct happens and the sleepover occurs. sent24: the caning meloid occurs. sent25: that the unfreeness occurs is triggered by that the taming occurs but the caning finch does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the nonfinancialness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the recitation occurs.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Sotho happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the misconduct happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the Sothoness happens and the misconduct occurs.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the caning finch does not occur.; sent9 & sent18 -> int6: the assassination does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the emmetropicness does not occur and the looming malabsorption does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the tamedness occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the tamedness happens and the caning finch does not occur.; int9 & sent25 -> int10: the unfreeness occurs.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__