the sweater is a kind of a lanolin and it is cardiac.
sent1: that the provirus does not laicize Marseille hold if the ichneumon does laicize Marseille and is not rh-negative. sent2: the ichneumon is not metropolitan. sent3: the fact that the sweater does not laicize Marseille but it does vacate outgoing is not true if the ingrate does not laicize Marseille. sent4: the oxbow vacates snuffers but it is not an explosive if the ichneumon is non-metropolitan. sent5: the sweater is a lanolin if it is not loamless. sent6: the sweater is cardiac and it is a Brama. sent7: if the oxbow does vacate snuffers and is not a kind of an explosive then the snuffers is rh-negative. sent8: the ingrate does not laicize Marseille if the snuffers does finger Marquand and/or it is rh-negative.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the oxbow vacates snuffers and is not explosive.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the snuffers is rh-negative.; int2 -> int3: either the snuffers does finger Marquand or it is rh-negative or both.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the ingrate does not laicize Marseille is true.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the sweater does not laicize Marseille but it does vacate outgoing does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: the sweater is cardiac.;
the provirus does not laicize Marseille.
$hypothesis$ = the sweater is a kind of a lanolin and it is cardiac. ; $context$ = sent1: that the provirus does not laicize Marseille hold if the ichneumon does laicize Marseille and is not rh-negative. sent2: the ichneumon is not metropolitan. sent3: the fact that the sweater does not laicize Marseille but it does vacate outgoing is not true if the ingrate does not laicize Marseille. sent4: the oxbow vacates snuffers but it is not an explosive if the ichneumon is non-metropolitan. sent5: the sweater is a lanolin if it is not loamless. sent6: the sweater is cardiac and it is a Brama. sent7: if the oxbow does vacate snuffers and is not a kind of an explosive then the snuffers is rh-negative. sent8: the ingrate does not laicize Marseille if the snuffers does finger Marquand and/or it is rh-negative. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the oxbow vacates snuffers and is not explosive.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the snuffers is rh-negative.; int2 -> int3: either the snuffers does finger Marquand or it is rh-negative or both.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the ingrate does not laicize Marseille is true.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the sweater does not laicize Marseille but it does vacate outgoing does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: the sweater is cardiac.; __UNKNOWN__