the cirrus is a kind of a Eschscholtzia that is a pentecostalism.
sent1: if something is a kind of cogitative thing that does not loom subpoena then it is not a pentecostalism. sent2: the methanol is not arteriolar if it is not a cupule and it is apophatic. sent3: the dishpan is both sacerdotal and a clarion. sent4: the methanol is both not a cupule and apophatic. sent5: the cirrus is a pentecostalism and is a kind of a polish. sent6: if the fact that something is a kind of a clarion but it does not loom silver-lace is not correct then it is cogitative. sent7: that the cirrus is a kind of a polish is right. sent8: that that the dishpan is a clarion that does not loom silver-lace is false is correct if it is not a RNA. sent9: if something is not a clarion it is cogitative. sent10: something that is not a polish is cogitative thing that does not loom subpoena. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a mother-in-law that the madderwort does not spit but it does elute jadeite is not true. sent12: the barycenter is not a mother-in-law if the fact that it is a kind of an updating that is a acrocarp does not hold. sent13: the fact that the barycenter does update and it is a kind of a acrocarp does not hold if the methanol is not arteriolar. sent14: the cirrus is a Eschscholtzia if the dishpan does loom subpoena. sent15: the dishpan is a kind of a Eschscholtzia. sent16: the cirrus is a Eschscholtzia if it is cogitative. sent17: that the studio is both a polish and a RNA is not true if there exists something such that it is a ferocity. sent18: the gonion looms silver-lace. sent19: if the dishpan is not a clarion then that it is cogitative is not incorrect. sent20: if that the studio is a polish and a RNA is not right the Lord is not a polish. sent21: the dishpan is not a RNA. sent22: if that something is not a spat but it elutes jadeite is not true then it is a kind of a ferocity. sent23: the five is a kind of a polish.
sent6 -> int1: if that the fact that the dishpan does clarion but it does not loom silver-lace is not incorrect is not true then it is cogitative.; sent8 & sent21 -> int2: that the dishpan is a clarion that does not loom silver-lace is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dishpan is cogitative.; sent5 -> int4: the cirrus is a pentecostalism.;
the fact that the cirrus is a Eschscholtzia and it is a kind of a pentecostalism is not true.
sent1 -> int5: that the Lord is not a pentecostalism is not false if that it is cogitative and it does not loom subpoena is true.; sent10 -> int6: if the Lord is not a polish then it is cogitative and it does not loom subpoena.; sent22 -> int7: if the fact that that the madderwort does not spit but it elutes jadeite is wrong hold then it is a kind of a ferocity.; sent2 & sent4 -> int8: the methanol is not arteriolar.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: that the barycenter is a kind of an updating and it is a acrocarp is false.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the barycenter is not a mother-in-law.; int10 -> int11: something is not a kind of a mother-in-law.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the fact that the madderwort is not a spat and elutes jadeite is incorrect.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the madderwort is a ferocity.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a ferocity.; int14 & sent17 -> int15: that the studio is both a polish and a RNA is not correct.; sent20 & int15 -> int16: the Lord is not a kind of a polish.; int6 & int16 -> int17: the Lord is cogitative and does not loom subpoena.; int5 & int17 -> int18: the Lord is not a kind of a pentecostalism.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a pentecostalism.;
$hypothesis$ = the cirrus is a kind of a Eschscholtzia that is a pentecostalism. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of cogitative thing that does not loom subpoena then it is not a pentecostalism. sent2: the methanol is not arteriolar if it is not a cupule and it is apophatic. sent3: the dishpan is both sacerdotal and a clarion. sent4: the methanol is both not a cupule and apophatic. sent5: the cirrus is a pentecostalism and is a kind of a polish. sent6: if the fact that something is a kind of a clarion but it does not loom silver-lace is not correct then it is cogitative. sent7: that the cirrus is a kind of a polish is right. sent8: that that the dishpan is a clarion that does not loom silver-lace is false is correct if it is not a RNA. sent9: if something is not a clarion it is cogitative. sent10: something that is not a polish is cogitative thing that does not loom subpoena. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a mother-in-law that the madderwort does not spit but it does elute jadeite is not true. sent12: the barycenter is not a mother-in-law if the fact that it is a kind of an updating that is a acrocarp does not hold. sent13: the fact that the barycenter does update and it is a kind of a acrocarp does not hold if the methanol is not arteriolar. sent14: the cirrus is a Eschscholtzia if the dishpan does loom subpoena. sent15: the dishpan is a kind of a Eschscholtzia. sent16: the cirrus is a Eschscholtzia if it is cogitative. sent17: that the studio is both a polish and a RNA is not true if there exists something such that it is a ferocity. sent18: the gonion looms silver-lace. sent19: if the dishpan is not a clarion then that it is cogitative is not incorrect. sent20: if that the studio is a polish and a RNA is not right the Lord is not a polish. sent21: the dishpan is not a RNA. sent22: if that something is not a spat but it elutes jadeite is not true then it is a kind of a ferocity. sent23: the five is a kind of a polish. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if that the fact that the dishpan does clarion but it does not loom silver-lace is not incorrect is not true then it is cogitative.; sent8 & sent21 -> int2: that the dishpan is a clarion that does not loom silver-lace is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dishpan is cogitative.; sent5 -> int4: the cirrus is a pentecostalism.; __UNKNOWN__