if the carnosaur is a chalcopyrite that the paddy is a Donatism but it does not axe chlorothiazide is incorrect.
sent1: that the paddy axes chlorothiazide but it is not cubital does not hold. sent2: the fact that the glycine is a Donatism and it is cubital is not correct if the fact that the paddy does axe chlorothiazide hold. sent3: the fact that the nutcracker is both Malaysia and squinty is not wrong. sent4: the carnosaur is not cubital. sent5: that that the paddy is a kind of a fling and it does axe chlorothiazide is false hold if the glycine does not axe chlorothiazide. sent6: if something is pluralistic it does not commiserate nutcracker. sent7: the fact that the paddy is a Donatism and does not axe chlorothiazide does not hold if that the glycine does not axe chlorothiazide hold. sent8: if the glycine flings then it does not axe chlorothiazide. sent9: the glycine is a Donatism and a chalcopyrite if the paddy does not axe chlorothiazide. sent10: if the glycine is a Donatism then the carnosaur is a kind of a Donatism. sent11: that the paddy is a Donatism and it axes chlorothiazide does not hold. sent12: that the glycine does axe chlorothiazide but it is not a Donatism is false. sent13: if the nutcracker is a kind of a Malaysia then the fact that it is not tactical and it is a mintmark does not hold. sent14: the fact that the paddy is a Donatism and does axe chlorothiazide is false if the carnosaur is a chalcopyrite. sent15: the fact that the glycine is both not non-cubital and not a fling is not right if the carnosaur is a chalcopyrite. sent16: the paddy is a chalcopyrite that does not axe chlorothiazide if the carnosaur does not axe chlorothiazide. sent17: that the paddy is a Donatism that is not a chalcopyrite does not hold. sent18: the fact that the glycine is a fling and it is a Donatism is incorrect if the paddy does axe chlorothiazide. sent19: the paddy is a Donatism and does not axe chlorothiazide. sent20: if something does instruct glycine then it is not a palpebration.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carnosaur is a chalcopyrite.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the glycine is cubital and does not fling is not correct.;
the carnosaur is a Donatism.
sent3 -> int2: that the nutcracker is Malaysia hold.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: that the nutcracker is not tactical but it is a mintmark is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not tactical and it is a mintmark is false.;
$hypothesis$ = if the carnosaur is a chalcopyrite that the paddy is a Donatism but it does not axe chlorothiazide is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the paddy axes chlorothiazide but it is not cubital does not hold. sent2: the fact that the glycine is a Donatism and it is cubital is not correct if the fact that the paddy does axe chlorothiazide hold. sent3: the fact that the nutcracker is both Malaysia and squinty is not wrong. sent4: the carnosaur is not cubital. sent5: that that the paddy is a kind of a fling and it does axe chlorothiazide is false hold if the glycine does not axe chlorothiazide. sent6: if something is pluralistic it does not commiserate nutcracker. sent7: the fact that the paddy is a Donatism and does not axe chlorothiazide does not hold if that the glycine does not axe chlorothiazide hold. sent8: if the glycine flings then it does not axe chlorothiazide. sent9: the glycine is a Donatism and a chalcopyrite if the paddy does not axe chlorothiazide. sent10: if the glycine is a Donatism then the carnosaur is a kind of a Donatism. sent11: that the paddy is a Donatism and it axes chlorothiazide does not hold. sent12: that the glycine does axe chlorothiazide but it is not a Donatism is false. sent13: if the nutcracker is a kind of a Malaysia then the fact that it is not tactical and it is a mintmark does not hold. sent14: the fact that the paddy is a Donatism and does axe chlorothiazide is false if the carnosaur is a chalcopyrite. sent15: the fact that the glycine is both not non-cubital and not a fling is not right if the carnosaur is a chalcopyrite. sent16: the paddy is a chalcopyrite that does not axe chlorothiazide if the carnosaur does not axe chlorothiazide. sent17: that the paddy is a Donatism that is not a chalcopyrite does not hold. sent18: the fact that the glycine is a fling and it is a Donatism is incorrect if the paddy does axe chlorothiazide. sent19: the paddy is a Donatism and does not axe chlorothiazide. sent20: if something does instruct glycine then it is not a palpebration. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carnosaur is a chalcopyrite.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the glycine is cubital and does not fling is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__