the fact that there exists something such that if it is noble that it is general but not biotypic is false is incorrect.
sent1: that something does bawl porbeagle but it is not biotypic is false if it is a kind of a Coeloglossum. sent2: the fact that the sheller is a short-stop but it does not mask Cadiz is not correct if it is noble. sent3: there is something such that if it is noble that the fact that it is not non-general and is biotypic is correct is incorrect. sent4: that there is something such that if it is cervical then the fact that it is parotid and it is not a kind of a microsporangium is false hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is unborn that the fact that it is a denturist that is not a charley-horse is not false is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the plier is both noble and not a take does not hold if it bawls adapter. sent7: if the plier is noble the fact that it is a general and is biotypic is incorrect. sent8: if the plier is noble then the fact that it is a kind of a general that is not biotypic is wrong. sent9: if something does sensualize anesthesiology that it masks second and is not general is not true. sent10: there is something such that if it is noble then the fact that it is a general but not biotypic is right. sent11: if the atoll is striate that the fact that it is a kind of a highbrow and it does not race hold does not hold. sent12: that the plier is general but not biotypic is right if it is noble. sent13: if something is a scheelite that it is biotypic thing that is not a kind of a bolt is not true. sent14: the fact that the fact that the plier is a kind of a bolt that is not a place-kicker is not correct is true if it does steepen fingerpost.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the ameloblast does mask second but it is not a kind of a general is incorrect if it sensualizes anesthesiology.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is noble that it is general but not biotypic is false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does bawl porbeagle but it is not biotypic is false if it is a kind of a Coeloglossum. sent2: the fact that the sheller is a short-stop but it does not mask Cadiz is not correct if it is noble. sent3: there is something such that if it is noble that the fact that it is not non-general and is biotypic is correct is incorrect. sent4: that there is something such that if it is cervical then the fact that it is parotid and it is not a kind of a microsporangium is false hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is unborn that the fact that it is a denturist that is not a charley-horse is not false is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the plier is both noble and not a take does not hold if it bawls adapter. sent7: if the plier is noble the fact that it is a general and is biotypic is incorrect. sent8: if the plier is noble then the fact that it is a kind of a general that is not biotypic is wrong. sent9: if something does sensualize anesthesiology that it masks second and is not general is not true. sent10: there is something such that if it is noble then the fact that it is a general but not biotypic is right. sent11: if the atoll is striate that the fact that it is a kind of a highbrow and it does not race hold does not hold. sent12: that the plier is general but not biotypic is right if it is noble. sent13: if something is a scheelite that it is biotypic thing that is not a kind of a bolt is not true. sent14: the fact that the fact that the plier is a kind of a bolt that is not a place-kicker is not correct is true if it does steepen fingerpost. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__