the pluralist is a Picasso.
sent1: the caspase is not a diffuseness and is a Pempheridae. sent2: something is apologetic thing that is a zygoma if it is not a kind of a isomerization. sent3: the NSAID is not a kind of a isomerization if something that is not a diffuseness is a Pempheridae. sent4: if the caspase is a embroideress then the NSAID does not brief yak but it is an overlap. sent5: the fact that the NSAID does not brief yak and is a embroideress is right if the pluralist is a kind of a Picasso. sent6: if the caspase is not an overlap that that the NSAID does not brief yak but it is a embroideress is not wrong is not true. sent7: the NSAID does not brief yak if the pluralist is a Picasso. sent8: the fact that the NSAID does brief yak and it is a embroideress is not right. sent9: if the pluralist is not an overlap that the caspase is not a Picasso and does brief yak is not right. sent10: something does overlap if it is apologetic. sent11: the caspase is not a kind of an overlap.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pluralist is a Picasso.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the NSAID does not brief yak but it is a kind of a embroideress.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the NSAID does not brief yak but it is a embroideress is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the pluralist is a Picasso.
sent10 -> int4: if the NSAID is not unapologetic it is a kind of an overlap.; sent2 -> int5: the NSAID is apologetic and it is a kind of a zygoma if it is not a isomerization.; sent1 -> int6: there is something such that it is not a diffuseness and is a Pempheridae.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the NSAID is not a kind of a isomerization.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the NSAID is both apologetic and a zygoma.; int8 -> int9: the NSAID is apologetic.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the NSAID is an overlap.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it overlaps.;
$hypothesis$ = the pluralist is a Picasso. ; $context$ = sent1: the caspase is not a diffuseness and is a Pempheridae. sent2: something is apologetic thing that is a zygoma if it is not a kind of a isomerization. sent3: the NSAID is not a kind of a isomerization if something that is not a diffuseness is a Pempheridae. sent4: if the caspase is a embroideress then the NSAID does not brief yak but it is an overlap. sent5: the fact that the NSAID does not brief yak and is a embroideress is right if the pluralist is a kind of a Picasso. sent6: if the caspase is not an overlap that that the NSAID does not brief yak but it is a embroideress is not wrong is not true. sent7: the NSAID does not brief yak if the pluralist is a Picasso. sent8: the fact that the NSAID does brief yak and it is a embroideress is not right. sent9: if the pluralist is not an overlap that the caspase is not a Picasso and does brief yak is not right. sent10: something does overlap if it is apologetic. sent11: the caspase is not a kind of an overlap. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pluralist is a Picasso.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the NSAID does not brief yak but it is a kind of a embroideress.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the NSAID does not brief yak but it is a embroideress is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__