the barbecuing does not occur.
sent1: if the looking Tagore does not occur both the transportation and the fugalness happens. sent2: the venography does not occur. sent3: if the phrenologicalness and the agrypnoticness occurs then the organicness does not occur. sent4: that the loss does not occur triggers that the agrypnoticness does not occur and/or the organic. sent5: if the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur that either the unconquerableness does not occur or the swagging does not occur or both does not hold. sent6: the decimalizing happens. sent7: if the interpolating indisposition happens the digitalization occurs. sent8: that the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur and the transportation does not occur is triggered by the mercy. sent9: if the fidgeting phlebectomy happens then the fact that the swag does not occur and the unconquerableness does not occur does not hold. sent10: that the fidgeting phlebectomy happens hold if that not the fidgeting phlebectomy but the mercy happens does not hold. sent11: if the loss does not occur then the fact that the organicness and the agrypnoticness happens does not hold. sent12: the proctoscopy does not occur and the vagary occurs. sent13: that the baptismalness does not occur is brought about by that the vagary and the digitalization occurs. sent14: if the fact that the unconquerableness does not occur and/or the swag does not occur is not correct then the loss happens. sent15: the interpolating indisposition occurs if that the looking does not occur and/or the fungicidalness does not occur is not right. sent16: that the disturbance and the looking Tagore occurs is wrong if the fact that the baptismalness does not occur hold. sent17: the fact that the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur but the mercy occurs is not true if the transportation occurs. sent18: the exalting occurs. sent19: the mercy occurs. sent20: the fact that the organicness occurs hold. sent21: if that both the disturbance and the looking Tagore happens is not correct then the looking Tagore does not occur. sent22: if the decimalizing happens the phrenologicalness happens.
sent22 & sent6 -> int1: the phrenologicalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the agrypnoticness occurs hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the phrenologicalness occurs and the agrypnoticness happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the organic does not occur.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the agrypnoticness does not occur.; sent8 & sent19 -> int6: the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur and the transportation does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: that either the unconquerableness does not occur or the swagging does not occur or both is not right.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the loss occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the loss occurs and the agrypnoticness does not occur.;
the barbecuing occurs.
sent12 -> int11: the vagary happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the barbecuing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the looking Tagore does not occur both the transportation and the fugalness happens. sent2: the venography does not occur. sent3: if the phrenologicalness and the agrypnoticness occurs then the organicness does not occur. sent4: that the loss does not occur triggers that the agrypnoticness does not occur and/or the organic. sent5: if the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur that either the unconquerableness does not occur or the swagging does not occur or both does not hold. sent6: the decimalizing happens. sent7: if the interpolating indisposition happens the digitalization occurs. sent8: that the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur and the transportation does not occur is triggered by the mercy. sent9: if the fidgeting phlebectomy happens then the fact that the swag does not occur and the unconquerableness does not occur does not hold. sent10: that the fidgeting phlebectomy happens hold if that not the fidgeting phlebectomy but the mercy happens does not hold. sent11: if the loss does not occur then the fact that the organicness and the agrypnoticness happens does not hold. sent12: the proctoscopy does not occur and the vagary occurs. sent13: that the baptismalness does not occur is brought about by that the vagary and the digitalization occurs. sent14: if the fact that the unconquerableness does not occur and/or the swag does not occur is not correct then the loss happens. sent15: the interpolating indisposition occurs if that the looking does not occur and/or the fungicidalness does not occur is not right. sent16: that the disturbance and the looking Tagore occurs is wrong if the fact that the baptismalness does not occur hold. sent17: the fact that the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur but the mercy occurs is not true if the transportation occurs. sent18: the exalting occurs. sent19: the mercy occurs. sent20: the fact that the organicness occurs hold. sent21: if that both the disturbance and the looking Tagore happens is not correct then the looking Tagore does not occur. sent22: if the decimalizing happens the phrenologicalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent6 -> int1: the phrenologicalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the agrypnoticness occurs hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the phrenologicalness occurs and the agrypnoticness happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the organic does not occur.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the agrypnoticness does not occur.; sent8 & sent19 -> int6: the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur and the transportation does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the fidgeting phlebectomy does not occur.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: that either the unconquerableness does not occur or the swagging does not occur or both is not right.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the loss occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the loss occurs and the agrypnoticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__