the towhee is Hugoesque and it is not predictable.
sent1: the tricot is not Darwinian. sent2: the entomologist is both not a jumble and a IWW. sent3: the poet is a kind of a orthicon if that the towhee is predictable thing that is a Camelus hold. sent4: the fact that the towhee is Hugoesque and unpredictable is not right if the entomologist is not a kind of a Issus. sent5: the fact that if the poet is not a kind of a orthicon and churns bootlegging then the towhee is Hugoesque is true. sent6: the poet is not a orthicon and does churn bootlegging if that it is not a motorboat hold. sent7: if the tricot is a kind of a orthicon then the fact that the telpherage does motorboat hold. sent8: something is a kind of a orthicon and it does churn bootlegging if it is not a kind of a peepshow. sent9: the fact that the poet is a Gymnosporangium if the entomologist does not jumble and is a IWW is true. sent10: if that something is technophilic and it is pyogenic is not true then it is non-anarchistic. sent11: the fact that the poet is not a kind of a Camelus and is not a kind of a Issus is incorrect if it is a Gymnosporangium. sent12: the fact that the entomologist is a Camelus is correct if the fact that it is not a motorboat and not reparable is not true. sent13: the poet is not a Gymnosporangium if the mutilator is not reparable. sent14: the towhee is unpredictable. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Darwinian then the fact that it is technophilic and it is not non-pyogenic is incorrect. sent16: the spouse is a kind of a Camelus that does chondrify. sent17: the entomologist is not a Issus if the poet is a Issus. sent18: that something is a Issus and/or not a Camelus is not wrong if it is not a Gymnosporangium. sent19: something is not a kind of a peepshow if the fact that it is not anarchistic is not incorrect. sent20: that the entomologist is not a motorboat and not reparable is wrong if it is not a kind of a orthicon. sent21: that the poet is not reparable is not false if that it is not a kind of a Camelus and is not a Issus is not correct. sent22: the entomologist is not a orthicon.
sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the poet is a Gymnosporangium.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the poet is not a Camelus and it is not a Issus is incorrect.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the poet is not reparable.;
the onion does not churn bootlegging.
sent20 & sent22 -> int4: that the entomologist is both not a motorboat and not reparable is not correct.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the entomologist is a Camelus.;
$hypothesis$ = the towhee is Hugoesque and it is not predictable. ; $context$ = sent1: the tricot is not Darwinian. sent2: the entomologist is both not a jumble and a IWW. sent3: the poet is a kind of a orthicon if that the towhee is predictable thing that is a Camelus hold. sent4: the fact that the towhee is Hugoesque and unpredictable is not right if the entomologist is not a kind of a Issus. sent5: the fact that if the poet is not a kind of a orthicon and churns bootlegging then the towhee is Hugoesque is true. sent6: the poet is not a orthicon and does churn bootlegging if that it is not a motorboat hold. sent7: if the tricot is a kind of a orthicon then the fact that the telpherage does motorboat hold. sent8: something is a kind of a orthicon and it does churn bootlegging if it is not a kind of a peepshow. sent9: the fact that the poet is a Gymnosporangium if the entomologist does not jumble and is a IWW is true. sent10: if that something is technophilic and it is pyogenic is not true then it is non-anarchistic. sent11: the fact that the poet is not a kind of a Camelus and is not a kind of a Issus is incorrect if it is a Gymnosporangium. sent12: the fact that the entomologist is a Camelus is correct if the fact that it is not a motorboat and not reparable is not true. sent13: the poet is not a Gymnosporangium if the mutilator is not reparable. sent14: the towhee is unpredictable. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Darwinian then the fact that it is technophilic and it is not non-pyogenic is incorrect. sent16: the spouse is a kind of a Camelus that does chondrify. sent17: the entomologist is not a Issus if the poet is a Issus. sent18: that something is a Issus and/or not a Camelus is not wrong if it is not a Gymnosporangium. sent19: something is not a kind of a peepshow if the fact that it is not anarchistic is not incorrect. sent20: that the entomologist is not a motorboat and not reparable is wrong if it is not a kind of a orthicon. sent21: that the poet is not reparable is not false if that it is not a kind of a Camelus and is not a Issus is not correct. sent22: the entomologist is not a orthicon. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the poet is a Gymnosporangium.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the poet is not a Camelus and it is not a Issus is incorrect.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the poet is not reparable.; __UNKNOWN__