the fact that that the self-flagellation happens triggers that the adoptiveness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the freighting happens is not false. sent2: the gurgling happens. sent3: the sophisticating I-beam does not occur if the controlling does not occur. sent4: that the sophisticating springbok does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: if the fact that the counter-sabotage occurs is wrong then the terrorism does not occur. sent6: if the adoptiveness does not occur then the self-flagellation does not occur. sent7: if the adoptiveness does not occur then the self-flagellation occurs. sent8: if the turnover does not occur the iambicness happens. sent9: the roundingness does not occur. sent10: the antigenicness does not occur if the biosystematicsness does not occur. sent11: if the adoptiveness occurs the self-flagellation does not occur. sent12: that the propaedeutic happens prevents that the rummage does not occur. sent13: if the rewriting constable happens the bloodbath does not occur. sent14: the rewriting aggrandizement occurs. sent15: the pallone occurs. sent16: that the sophisticating bogy does not occur is prevented by that the synergisticness does not occur. sent17: if the investing does not occur then the vindication does not occur. sent18: the novation happens if the draping duplex does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the adoptiveness does not occur.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the self-flagellation does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the self-flagellation occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the adoptiveness occurs is not false.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the self-flagellation happens triggers that the adoptiveness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the freighting happens is not false. sent2: the gurgling happens. sent3: the sophisticating I-beam does not occur if the controlling does not occur. sent4: that the sophisticating springbok does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: if the fact that the counter-sabotage occurs is wrong then the terrorism does not occur. sent6: if the adoptiveness does not occur then the self-flagellation does not occur. sent7: if the adoptiveness does not occur then the self-flagellation occurs. sent8: if the turnover does not occur the iambicness happens. sent9: the roundingness does not occur. sent10: the antigenicness does not occur if the biosystematicsness does not occur. sent11: if the adoptiveness occurs the self-flagellation does not occur. sent12: that the propaedeutic happens prevents that the rummage does not occur. sent13: if the rewriting constable happens the bloodbath does not occur. sent14: the rewriting aggrandizement occurs. sent15: the pallone occurs. sent16: that the sophisticating bogy does not occur is prevented by that the synergisticness does not occur. sent17: if the investing does not occur then the vindication does not occur. sent18: the novation happens if the draping duplex does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the adoptiveness does not occur.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the self-flagellation does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the self-flagellation occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the adoptiveness occurs is not false.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__