that the directing does not occur is brought about by that the tastiness occurs but the Paulineness does not occur.
sent1: the lulling infusion does not occur. sent2: the uncared-forness does not occur if the directedness but not the salving occurs. sent3: that the febrileness does not occur is true if both the dramaturgicness and the preserving Empetraceae occurs. sent4: that the Paulineness occurs is prevented by that the preserving variegation does not occur and the drooping does not occur. sent5: that the recursion does not occur is caused by that the salve and the directedness happens. sent6: if the recursion does not occur that the tastiness happens and the Paulineness does not occur is not true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tastiness but not the Paulineness happens.;
the uncared-forness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the directing does not occur is brought about by that the tastiness occurs but the Paulineness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the lulling infusion does not occur. sent2: the uncared-forness does not occur if the directedness but not the salving occurs. sent3: that the febrileness does not occur is true if both the dramaturgicness and the preserving Empetraceae occurs. sent4: that the Paulineness occurs is prevented by that the preserving variegation does not occur and the drooping does not occur. sent5: that the recursion does not occur is caused by that the salve and the directedness happens. sent6: if the recursion does not occur that the tastiness happens and the Paulineness does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tastiness but not the Paulineness happens.; __UNKNOWN__