the Patella is not sarcolemmic.
sent1: the forge is a dissent. sent2: the fact that the stowage is indestructible is not incorrect if a sabbatical thing is a apishamore. sent3: something does weed Capella if it does not weed hollowness and it is not a meloid. sent4: everything does not weed hollowness. sent5: the Patella is husbandly if the stowage is indestructible. sent6: there exists something such that it is sabbatical. sent7: everything does not weed hollowness and it is not a meloid. sent8: there exists something such that it is a apishamore. sent9: the forge does dissent if something does wonder. sent10: the forge is a apishamore and it dissents if that there exists something such that it is a wonder is right. sent11: something is sarcolemmic if it is husbandly. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does unfurl is not incorrect. sent13: if the digest weeds Capella then the forge is a sabbatical. sent14: the agora wonders.
sent3 -> int1: if the digest does not weed hollowness and it is not a meloid the fact that it does weed Capella hold.; sent7 -> int2: the digest does not weed hollowness and it is not a meloid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the digest weeds Capella.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the forge is a sabbatical.; sent14 -> int5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a wonder.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the forge is a apishamore and it dissents.; int6 -> int7: the forge is a apishamore.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the forge is sabbatical thing that is a kind of a apishamore.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is sabbatical and it is a apishamore.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the stowage is indestructible.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the Patella is husbandly.; sent11 -> int12: the Patella is sarcolemmic if that it is husbandly is correct.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Patella is not sarcolemmic. ; $context$ = sent1: the forge is a dissent. sent2: the fact that the stowage is indestructible is not incorrect if a sabbatical thing is a apishamore. sent3: something does weed Capella if it does not weed hollowness and it is not a meloid. sent4: everything does not weed hollowness. sent5: the Patella is husbandly if the stowage is indestructible. sent6: there exists something such that it is sabbatical. sent7: everything does not weed hollowness and it is not a meloid. sent8: there exists something such that it is a apishamore. sent9: the forge does dissent if something does wonder. sent10: the forge is a apishamore and it dissents if that there exists something such that it is a wonder is right. sent11: something is sarcolemmic if it is husbandly. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does unfurl is not incorrect. sent13: if the digest weeds Capella then the forge is a sabbatical. sent14: the agora wonders. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the digest does not weed hollowness and it is not a meloid the fact that it does weed Capella hold.; sent7 -> int2: the digest does not weed hollowness and it is not a meloid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the digest weeds Capella.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the forge is a sabbatical.; sent14 -> int5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a wonder.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the forge is a apishamore and it dissents.; int6 -> int7: the forge is a apishamore.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the forge is sabbatical thing that is a kind of a apishamore.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is sabbatical and it is a apishamore.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the stowage is indestructible.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the Patella is husbandly.; sent11 -> int12: the Patella is sarcolemmic if that it is husbandly is correct.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__