the itineration does not occur.
sent1: the jingling does not occur. sent2: not the burning but the Homericness occurs if the archducalness does not occur. sent3: the tacticalness occurs. sent4: if the approaching willingness does not occur the itineration does not occur. sent5: the archducalness does not occur. sent6: that the sighing does not occur is brought about by that the egress does not occur. sent7: if the freeze-drying muntjac does not occur then the fact that both the guarding and the approaching tastefulness happens is right. sent8: the fact that both the shaving and the podding occurs hold. sent9: the fact that the fact that the burning does not occur but the Homericness occurs is wrong is not wrong if the approaching tastefulness does not occur. sent10: that the itineration and the approaching tastefulness happens is caused by that the freeze-drying muntjac does not occur. sent11: if the freeze-drying infant's-breath does not occur that the approaching Ovral occurs is correct. sent12: if that the regarding Phragmipedium does not occur is not incorrect the fact that not the vaticinating but the check-in occurs is false. sent13: the approaching willingness does not occur if the approaching tastefulness occurs and the freeze-drying muntjac happens. sent14: that the aftershock happens and the blinding happens is not true if the smoke does not occur. sent15: either the approaching pedometer does not occur or the jingling happens or both. sent16: both the vault and the baiting occurs if the Eurasian does not occur. sent17: if the freeze-drying macule does not occur then the fact that the approaching willingness happens and the archducalness occurs hold. sent18: both the freeze-drying macule and the kowtow happens if the jingle does not occur. sent19: the freeze-drying muntjac is brought about by that the kowtow occurs. sent20: the sericulturalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the approaching tastefulness does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that not the burning but the Homericness happens is incorrect is right.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the burning does not occur and the Homericness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the approaching tastefulness happens.; sent18 & sent1 -> int5: the freeze-drying macule occurs and the kowtow happens.; int5 -> int6: the kowtow happens.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the freeze-drying muntjac occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the approaching tastefulness and the freeze-drying muntjac occurs.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the approaching willingness does not occur.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the guarding occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the itineration does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the jingling does not occur. sent2: not the burning but the Homericness occurs if the archducalness does not occur. sent3: the tacticalness occurs. sent4: if the approaching willingness does not occur the itineration does not occur. sent5: the archducalness does not occur. sent6: that the sighing does not occur is brought about by that the egress does not occur. sent7: if the freeze-drying muntjac does not occur then the fact that both the guarding and the approaching tastefulness happens is right. sent8: the fact that both the shaving and the podding occurs hold. sent9: the fact that the fact that the burning does not occur but the Homericness occurs is wrong is not wrong if the approaching tastefulness does not occur. sent10: that the itineration and the approaching tastefulness happens is caused by that the freeze-drying muntjac does not occur. sent11: if the freeze-drying infant's-breath does not occur that the approaching Ovral occurs is correct. sent12: if that the regarding Phragmipedium does not occur is not incorrect the fact that not the vaticinating but the check-in occurs is false. sent13: the approaching willingness does not occur if the approaching tastefulness occurs and the freeze-drying muntjac happens. sent14: that the aftershock happens and the blinding happens is not true if the smoke does not occur. sent15: either the approaching pedometer does not occur or the jingling happens or both. sent16: both the vault and the baiting occurs if the Eurasian does not occur. sent17: if the freeze-drying macule does not occur then the fact that the approaching willingness happens and the archducalness occurs hold. sent18: both the freeze-drying macule and the kowtow happens if the jingle does not occur. sent19: the freeze-drying muntjac is brought about by that the kowtow occurs. sent20: the sericulturalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the approaching tastefulness does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that not the burning but the Homericness happens is incorrect is right.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the burning does not occur and the Homericness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the approaching tastefulness happens.; sent18 & sent1 -> int5: the freeze-drying macule occurs and the kowtow happens.; int5 -> int6: the kowtow happens.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the freeze-drying muntjac occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the approaching tastefulness and the freeze-drying muntjac occurs.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the approaching willingness does not occur.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__