the Hogg is a inaudibility.
sent1: if the timberline is not artificial the fact that the fact that the Hogg mythologizes meltdown but it does not chock ginseng is wrong is correct. sent2: the timberline is not artificial. sent3: the Hogg is not genic. sent4: that the timberline is not a Aix but a inaudibility is false if the Hogg is not artificial. sent5: if the timberline is not artificial then it is a Aix and it is bohemian. sent6: the timberline is not genic if the fact that it does not mythologize meltdown and it is not artificial is not correct. sent7: something is not a bohemian if the fact that it does not mythologize meltdown and it does not chock ginseng is not correct. sent8: the fact that the timberline does not mythologize meltdown and it does not chock ginseng does not hold if that the Hogg is not a Ceratophyllum is not wrong. sent9: if something that is a inaudibility is not genic then it is not a Ceratophyllum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hogg is a kind of a inaudibility.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the Hogg is a kind of a inaudibility that is not genic.; sent9 -> int2: if the Hogg is a inaudibility and not genic it is not a Ceratophyllum.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Hogg is not a Ceratophyllum.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the timberline does not mythologize meltdown and it does not chock ginseng is not true.; sent7 -> int5: if the fact that the timberline does not mythologize meltdown and it does not chock ginseng does not hold it is not a bohemian.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the timberline is not bohemian.; sent5 & sent2 -> int7: the timberline is a Aix and is a bohemian.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the timberline is a kind of a bohemian is not incorrect.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Hogg is a inaudibility. ; $context$ = sent1: if the timberline is not artificial the fact that the fact that the Hogg mythologizes meltdown but it does not chock ginseng is wrong is correct. sent2: the timberline is not artificial. sent3: the Hogg is not genic. sent4: that the timberline is not a Aix but a inaudibility is false if the Hogg is not artificial. sent5: if the timberline is not artificial then it is a Aix and it is bohemian. sent6: the timberline is not genic if the fact that it does not mythologize meltdown and it is not artificial is not correct. sent7: something is not a bohemian if the fact that it does not mythologize meltdown and it does not chock ginseng is not correct. sent8: the fact that the timberline does not mythologize meltdown and it does not chock ginseng does not hold if that the Hogg is not a Ceratophyllum is not wrong. sent9: if something that is a inaudibility is not genic then it is not a Ceratophyllum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hogg is a kind of a inaudibility.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the Hogg is a kind of a inaudibility that is not genic.; sent9 -> int2: if the Hogg is a inaudibility and not genic it is not a Ceratophyllum.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Hogg is not a Ceratophyllum.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the timberline does not mythologize meltdown and it does not chock ginseng is not true.; sent7 -> int5: if the fact that the timberline does not mythologize meltdown and it does not chock ginseng does not hold it is not a bohemian.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the timberline is not bohemian.; sent5 & sent2 -> int7: the timberline is a Aix and is a bohemian.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the timberline is a kind of a bohemian is not incorrect.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__