the fact that the norethindrone is not a kind of a necklet and it is not intolerable does not hold.
sent1: if something does not manacle piper it does not ebb mincemeat or it does not equate or both. sent2: the epileptic does not manacle piper and it does not pelt. sent3: if the fact that the fact that the epileptic does not manacle piper and it does not ebb mincemeat does not hold is not incorrect then it does ebb mincemeat. sent4: the sediment does ebb mincemeat if the mulberry is not non-heterologous. sent5: the sediment ebbs mincemeat if that the mulberry does not ebbs mincemeat and it is not heterologous is incorrect. sent6: that that the fact that the mulberry is not a kind of a buttock and is non-heterologous is not incorrect is incorrect is not incorrect if it is not a kind of a Chateaubriand. sent7: that the home-farm is not a buttock is not wrong. sent8: the norethindrone is not a necklet if the fact that the sediment bestows and is not pentecostal does not hold. sent9: the home-farm is a kind of a buttock if the fact that the mulberry is not a buttock and it is not heterologous does not hold. sent10: something is pentecostal if it ebbs mincemeat. sent11: the epileptic is a necklet if that the norethindrone is a buttock is not wrong. sent12: that the mulberry does not ebb mincemeat and is not heterologous is not right. sent13: if something is a kind of a buttock it does equate. sent14: the epileptic is a buttock if something bestows and ebbs mincemeat. sent15: the home-farm equates. sent16: if the home-farm is intolerable that the norethindrone is a necklet but it is intolerable does not hold. sent17: the sediment is not non-pentecostal and it bestows. sent18: if a pentecostal thing does bestow the sediment is a necklet. sent19: if something that does equate is not a buttock then the epileptic bestows. sent20: the fact that the norethindrone is not a kind of a necklet and it is not intolerable is incorrect if the home-farm is intolerable. sent21: the fact that the sediment bestows and is not pentecostal is not right if it does not ebb mincemeat. sent22: if that the mulberry is not heterologous and it does not bestow does not hold then the sediment is heterologous. sent23: there exists something such that it does ebb mincemeat.
sent17 -> int1: the sediment does bestow.; sent5 & sent12 -> int2: the sediment does ebb mincemeat.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the sediment bestows and does ebb mincemeat is correct.; int3 -> int4: something bestows and does ebb mincemeat.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the epileptic is a kind of a buttock.; sent13 -> int6: if the fact that the epileptic is not a buttock is wrong it equates.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the epileptic equates.;
the norethindrone is not a necklet and not intolerable.
sent1 -> int8: the epileptic does not ebb mincemeat or it does not equate or both if it does not manacle piper.; sent2 -> int9: the epileptic does not manacle piper.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the epileptic does not ebb mincemeat or it does not equate or both is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the norethindrone is not a kind of a necklet and it is not intolerable does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not manacle piper it does not ebb mincemeat or it does not equate or both. sent2: the epileptic does not manacle piper and it does not pelt. sent3: if the fact that the fact that the epileptic does not manacle piper and it does not ebb mincemeat does not hold is not incorrect then it does ebb mincemeat. sent4: the sediment does ebb mincemeat if the mulberry is not non-heterologous. sent5: the sediment ebbs mincemeat if that the mulberry does not ebbs mincemeat and it is not heterologous is incorrect. sent6: that that the fact that the mulberry is not a kind of a buttock and is non-heterologous is not incorrect is incorrect is not incorrect if it is not a kind of a Chateaubriand. sent7: that the home-farm is not a buttock is not wrong. sent8: the norethindrone is not a necklet if the fact that the sediment bestows and is not pentecostal does not hold. sent9: the home-farm is a kind of a buttock if the fact that the mulberry is not a buttock and it is not heterologous does not hold. sent10: something is pentecostal if it ebbs mincemeat. sent11: the epileptic is a necklet if that the norethindrone is a buttock is not wrong. sent12: that the mulberry does not ebb mincemeat and is not heterologous is not right. sent13: if something is a kind of a buttock it does equate. sent14: the epileptic is a buttock if something bestows and ebbs mincemeat. sent15: the home-farm equates. sent16: if the home-farm is intolerable that the norethindrone is a necklet but it is intolerable does not hold. sent17: the sediment is not non-pentecostal and it bestows. sent18: if a pentecostal thing does bestow the sediment is a necklet. sent19: if something that does equate is not a buttock then the epileptic bestows. sent20: the fact that the norethindrone is not a kind of a necklet and it is not intolerable is incorrect if the home-farm is intolerable. sent21: the fact that the sediment bestows and is not pentecostal is not right if it does not ebb mincemeat. sent22: if that the mulberry is not heterologous and it does not bestow does not hold then the sediment is heterologous. sent23: there exists something such that it does ebb mincemeat. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the sediment does bestow.; sent5 & sent12 -> int2: the sediment does ebb mincemeat.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the sediment bestows and does ebb mincemeat is correct.; int3 -> int4: something bestows and does ebb mincemeat.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the epileptic is a kind of a buttock.; sent13 -> int6: if the fact that the epileptic is not a buttock is wrong it equates.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the epileptic equates.; __UNKNOWN__