that that the pericardialness but not the by-product occurs is brought about by that the lurching occurs does not hold.
sent1: if the by-product happens and the hyaloplasmicness does not occur then the mooring argy-bargy does not occur. sent2: the etherealness does not occur if the guzzling does not occur. sent3: that the mooring gust happens is brought about by that the football does not occur. sent4: if that the besieging rebirth does not occur is not incorrect then the mooring superstrate happens. sent5: the propping microeconomist does not occur. sent6: that the hyaloplasmicness does not occur is correct. sent7: if the mooring argy-bargy does not occur then the lurch does not occur. sent8: the toppling but not the pemphigousness happens. sent9: the devotional does not occur. sent10: if the mooring argy-bargy does not occur the lurching happens. sent11: that the toppling happens and the incommutableness happens is brought about by that the potlatch does not occur. sent12: if the articulation but not the besieging rebirth happens then the mooring Adenium does not occur. sent13: that the generalship occurs does not hold. sent14: the apogeanness happens and the shading happens. sent15: the fact that that the exodus occurs is wrong hold. sent16: that the connection happens causes that the comparative happens but the metrologicalness does not occur. sent17: that the unmasking happens is true. sent18: that the unfairness does not occur leads to that the belt happens. sent19: that the exodus does not occur brings about that the unmasking occurs and the pericardialness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the by-product occurs.; assump2 & sent6 -> int1: the by-product but not the hyaloplasmicness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the mooring argy-bargy does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the lurch does not occur hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lurch happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the by-product does not occur.; sent19 & sent15 -> int6: the unmasking occurs and the pericardialness happens.; int6 -> int7: the pericardialness happens.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the pericardialness occurs and the by-product does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the pericardialness but not the by-product occurs is brought about by that the lurching occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the by-product happens and the hyaloplasmicness does not occur then the mooring argy-bargy does not occur. sent2: the etherealness does not occur if the guzzling does not occur. sent3: that the mooring gust happens is brought about by that the football does not occur. sent4: if that the besieging rebirth does not occur is not incorrect then the mooring superstrate happens. sent5: the propping microeconomist does not occur. sent6: that the hyaloplasmicness does not occur is correct. sent7: if the mooring argy-bargy does not occur then the lurch does not occur. sent8: the toppling but not the pemphigousness happens. sent9: the devotional does not occur. sent10: if the mooring argy-bargy does not occur the lurching happens. sent11: that the toppling happens and the incommutableness happens is brought about by that the potlatch does not occur. sent12: if the articulation but not the besieging rebirth happens then the mooring Adenium does not occur. sent13: that the generalship occurs does not hold. sent14: the apogeanness happens and the shading happens. sent15: the fact that that the exodus occurs is wrong hold. sent16: that the connection happens causes that the comparative happens but the metrologicalness does not occur. sent17: that the unmasking happens is true. sent18: that the unfairness does not occur leads to that the belt happens. sent19: that the exodus does not occur brings about that the unmasking occurs and the pericardialness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the by-product occurs.; assump2 & sent6 -> int1: the by-product but not the hyaloplasmicness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the mooring argy-bargy does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the lurch does not occur hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lurch happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the by-product does not occur.; sent19 & sent15 -> int6: the unmasking occurs and the pericardialness happens.; int6 -> int7: the pericardialness happens.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the pericardialness occurs and the by-product does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__