the gasification does swelter beatnik.
sent1: if that something is not scalene or it is not a sunlamp or both is not right it swelters beatnik. sent2: the wagtail is not a compartmented. sent3: if something does truss wagtail and is a kind of a Aegean then it is not a kind of a rulership. sent4: if the kitul is not a kind of a rulership then the narcissist swelters beatnik and it is immunosuppressive. sent5: the fact that the gasification is not scalene and/or is not a sunlamp does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: if that the gasification is not scalene and/or it is not a sunlamp is not right it does swelter beatnik.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the detractor does not taste preconception and/or it is not scalene is false.
sent3 -> int2: the kitul is not a rulership if it trusses wagtail and it is a kind of a Aegean.; sent2 -> int3: something is not a compartmented.;
$hypothesis$ = the gasification does swelter beatnik. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not scalene or it is not a sunlamp or both is not right it swelters beatnik. sent2: the wagtail is not a compartmented. sent3: if something does truss wagtail and is a kind of a Aegean then it is not a kind of a rulership. sent4: if the kitul is not a kind of a rulership then the narcissist swelters beatnik and it is immunosuppressive. sent5: the fact that the gasification is not scalene and/or is not a sunlamp does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if that the gasification is not scalene and/or it is not a sunlamp is not right it does swelter beatnik.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__