the fact that there exists something such that it is autogenous and/or it does not crook cinnabar is incorrect.
sent1: either the wigwam is unrestrictive or it does contradistinguish rhinophyma or both if that that the Brother does crook folk hold is not true. sent2: the Brother is not autogenous if that it does crook milliradian and it does not crook cinnabar is wrong. sent3: the tomalley is autogenous and/or it does crook cinnabar. sent4: if the wigwam does crook folk the Brother is not unrestrictive. sent5: either the tomalley is autogenous or it does crook cinnabar or both if it does not signify. sent6: if something does not signify it is autogenous and/or it crooks cinnabar. sent7: if something does not signify then it is autogenous and/or it does not crook cinnabar. sent8: that if something is a schooner or it does overwrite or both the Brother overwrite is true. sent9: that the Brother does not crook folk hold. sent10: either the tomalley is unrestrictive or it does not signify or both if it does not contradistinguish rhinophyma. sent11: the tomalley does not signify if the wigwam is unrestrictive. sent12: that something does crook milliradian but it does not crook cinnabar is not correct if it over-writes. sent13: the fact that the tomalley does not signify is not wrong if that the wigwam contradistinguishes rhinophyma is right. sent14: the wigwam is a schooner and/or it over-writes. sent15: something is autogenous and/or it crooks cinnabar. sent16: That the folk does not crook Brother hold. sent17: the fact that the tomalley does signify is not incorrect if the wigwam is unrestrictive.
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the wigwam is unrestrictive or it does contradistinguish rhinophyma or both.; int1 & sent11 & sent13 -> int2: the tomalley does not signify.; sent7 -> int3: if the tomalley does not signify it is autogenous and/or it does not crook cinnabar.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the tomalley either is autogenous or does not crook cinnabar or both.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the tomalley is a girandole or is not permissible or both.
sent12 -> int5: the fact that that the Brother crooks milliradian and does not crook cinnabar is true does not hold if it does overwrite.; sent14 -> int6: something is a kind of a schooner or over-writes or both.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Brother over-writes.; int5 & int7 -> int8: that the Brother does crook milliradian but it does not crook cinnabar is not true.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the Brother is not autogenous.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is autogenous and/or it does not crook cinnabar is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: either the wigwam is unrestrictive or it does contradistinguish rhinophyma or both if that that the Brother does crook folk hold is not true. sent2: the Brother is not autogenous if that it does crook milliradian and it does not crook cinnabar is wrong. sent3: the tomalley is autogenous and/or it does crook cinnabar. sent4: if the wigwam does crook folk the Brother is not unrestrictive. sent5: either the tomalley is autogenous or it does crook cinnabar or both if it does not signify. sent6: if something does not signify it is autogenous and/or it crooks cinnabar. sent7: if something does not signify then it is autogenous and/or it does not crook cinnabar. sent8: that if something is a schooner or it does overwrite or both the Brother overwrite is true. sent9: that the Brother does not crook folk hold. sent10: either the tomalley is unrestrictive or it does not signify or both if it does not contradistinguish rhinophyma. sent11: the tomalley does not signify if the wigwam is unrestrictive. sent12: that something does crook milliradian but it does not crook cinnabar is not correct if it over-writes. sent13: the fact that the tomalley does not signify is not wrong if that the wigwam contradistinguishes rhinophyma is right. sent14: the wigwam is a schooner and/or it over-writes. sent15: something is autogenous and/or it crooks cinnabar. sent16: That the folk does not crook Brother hold. sent17: the fact that the tomalley does signify is not incorrect if the wigwam is unrestrictive. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the wigwam is unrestrictive or it does contradistinguish rhinophyma or both.; int1 & sent11 & sent13 -> int2: the tomalley does not signify.; sent7 -> int3: if the tomalley does not signify it is autogenous and/or it does not crook cinnabar.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the tomalley either is autogenous or does not crook cinnabar or both.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__