there exists something such that if it does not receive ichthyolatry and does not damp then it is archegonial.
sent1: that something receives ichthyolatry if it is not syllabic and does not meet exoticism is not wrong. sent2: if the neoprene does not receive ichthyolatry but it is a damp then that it is archegonial is not wrong. sent3: if something does not receive ichthyolatry and it does not damp the fact that it is archegonial is not wrong.
sent3 -> int1: if the neoprene does not receive ichthyolatry and is not a damp it is archegonial.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the queen is not syllabic and does not meet exoticism then it receives ichthyolatry.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not receive ichthyolatry and does not damp then it is archegonial. ; $context$ = sent1: that something receives ichthyolatry if it is not syllabic and does not meet exoticism is not wrong. sent2: if the neoprene does not receive ichthyolatry but it is a damp then that it is archegonial is not wrong. sent3: if something does not receive ichthyolatry and it does not damp the fact that it is archegonial is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the neoprene does not receive ichthyolatry and is not a damp it is archegonial.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__