if the valsartan is not a electrodeposition the Hispanic is a minuscule and is not a kind of a detente.
sent1: if the fact that the valsartan is not a detente is correct that the Hispanic is not racial is not incorrect. sent2: something is both not a pathology and not neurophysiological. sent3: there is something such that that it solemnizes churn and is not a electrodeposition is false. sent4: there is something such that it is not a electrodeposition. sent5: the valsartan is not a detente. sent6: there is something such that it is minuscule. sent7: there is something such that it is not a electrodeposition and it does not solemnize churn. sent8: the snook is not minuscule. sent9: there exists something such that that it is not a leeward and not a electrodeposition does not hold. sent10: that the valsartan is not prognathous and it is not racial is not right if it is not a electrodeposition. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a minuscule and it is not a electrodeposition. sent12: if that the snook does not solemnize churn is not incorrect then the Hispanic is a kind of a minuscule but it is not a kind of a detente. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is not prognathous and it is nonracial is wrong then the pronator is not a kind of a leeward. sent14: the Hispanic is a detente and is not a electrodeposition. sent15: if the pronator is not a electrodeposition that it is not a kind of a leeward and it is not a kind of a detente does not hold. sent16: the fact that the Hispanic is racial but it is not a detente does not hold. sent17: the liniment is not a electrodeposition. sent18: the snook is not prognathous if there is something such that it does not solemnize churn. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a electrodeposition and not minuscule is not true. sent20: there exists something such that it does not solemnize churn. sent21: if there are non-leeward things then the snook does not solemnize churn.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valsartan is not a kind of a electrodeposition.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the valsartan is both not prognathous and not racial is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not prognathous and it is not racial does not hold.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the pronator is not a kind of a leeward.; int3 -> int4: something is not leeward.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the snook does not solemnize churn.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the Hispanic is minuscule thing that is not a detente.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the valsartan is not a electrodeposition the Hispanic is a minuscule and is not a kind of a detente. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the valsartan is not a detente is correct that the Hispanic is not racial is not incorrect. sent2: something is both not a pathology and not neurophysiological. sent3: there is something such that that it solemnizes churn and is not a electrodeposition is false. sent4: there is something such that it is not a electrodeposition. sent5: the valsartan is not a detente. sent6: there is something such that it is minuscule. sent7: there is something such that it is not a electrodeposition and it does not solemnize churn. sent8: the snook is not minuscule. sent9: there exists something such that that it is not a leeward and not a electrodeposition does not hold. sent10: that the valsartan is not prognathous and it is not racial is not right if it is not a electrodeposition. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a minuscule and it is not a electrodeposition. sent12: if that the snook does not solemnize churn is not incorrect then the Hispanic is a kind of a minuscule but it is not a kind of a detente. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is not prognathous and it is nonracial is wrong then the pronator is not a kind of a leeward. sent14: the Hispanic is a detente and is not a electrodeposition. sent15: if the pronator is not a electrodeposition that it is not a kind of a leeward and it is not a kind of a detente does not hold. sent16: the fact that the Hispanic is racial but it is not a detente does not hold. sent17: the liniment is not a electrodeposition. sent18: the snook is not prognathous if there is something such that it does not solemnize churn. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a electrodeposition and not minuscule is not true. sent20: there exists something such that it does not solemnize churn. sent21: if there are non-leeward things then the snook does not solemnize churn. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valsartan is not a kind of a electrodeposition.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the valsartan is both not prognathous and not racial is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not prognathous and it is not racial does not hold.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the pronator is not a kind of a leeward.; int3 -> int4: something is not leeward.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the snook does not solemnize churn.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the Hispanic is minuscule thing that is not a detente.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__