there exists something such that if it is rhetorical then that it is not anemophilous hold.
sent1: the fact that something is inaesthetic and it is a kind of a Plattdeutsch does not hold if the fact that it is not anemophilous is correct. sent2: the Teutonist is not a kind of a Plattdeutsch if the fact that that the craftsman is inaesthetic and it is a Plattdeutsch is wrong hold. sent3: the tramline is not a snickersnee if the geordie does not orchestrate oligarchy and it is not a Canada. sent4: the quiver is anemophilous if it is a Plattdeutsch and it is rhetorical. sent5: the geordie does not orchestrate oligarchy and it is not a Canada. sent6: the quiver is a Plattdeutsch if the fact that the craftsman is not a pretext and is not necromantic is not true. sent7: the quiver is anemophilous if it is rhetorical. sent8: the fact that the craftsman is not a kind of a pretext and it is not necromantic is not correct. sent9: if the quiver is a stippler and not anemophilous the craftsman is not anemophilous. sent10: if something is not a serendipity it does not ail and burglarizes tendril. sent11: if the poke does ail then the quiver is a stippler but it is not anemophilous. sent12: something is anemophilous if it is a Plattdeutsch and is rhetorical. sent13: that the craftsman is not a kind of a pretext but it is necromantic is incorrect. sent14: the poke ails if the fact that the rotor does not ails and burglarizes tendril hold.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the quiver is a Plattdeutsch.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quiver is rhetorical.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the quiver is a Plattdeutsch and it is rhetorical.;
the Teutonist is necromantic.
sent1 -> int3: if the craftsman is not anemophilous that it is inaesthetic and is a Plattdeutsch is incorrect.; sent10 -> int4: the rotor does not ail and does burglarize tendril if it is not a serendipity.; sent3 & sent5 -> int5: the tramline is not a snickersnee.; int5 -> int6: that there exists something such that it is not a snickersnee is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is rhetorical then that it is not anemophilous hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is inaesthetic and it is a kind of a Plattdeutsch does not hold if the fact that it is not anemophilous is correct. sent2: the Teutonist is not a kind of a Plattdeutsch if the fact that that the craftsman is inaesthetic and it is a Plattdeutsch is wrong hold. sent3: the tramline is not a snickersnee if the geordie does not orchestrate oligarchy and it is not a Canada. sent4: the quiver is anemophilous if it is a Plattdeutsch and it is rhetorical. sent5: the geordie does not orchestrate oligarchy and it is not a Canada. sent6: the quiver is a Plattdeutsch if the fact that the craftsman is not a pretext and is not necromantic is not true. sent7: the quiver is anemophilous if it is rhetorical. sent8: the fact that the craftsman is not a kind of a pretext and it is not necromantic is not correct. sent9: if the quiver is a stippler and not anemophilous the craftsman is not anemophilous. sent10: if something is not a serendipity it does not ail and burglarizes tendril. sent11: if the poke does ail then the quiver is a stippler but it is not anemophilous. sent12: something is anemophilous if it is a Plattdeutsch and is rhetorical. sent13: that the craftsman is not a kind of a pretext but it is necromantic is incorrect. sent14: the poke ails if the fact that the rotor does not ails and burglarizes tendril hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the quiver is a Plattdeutsch.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quiver is rhetorical.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the quiver is a Plattdeutsch and it is rhetorical.; __UNKNOWN__