there exists something such that if it is both not monotheistic and not a recombinant then it is not a Thai.
sent1: that the gadabout is not a caiman is true if it is not a biocatalyst and it is not a kind of a Thai. sent2: if the globalization is not monotheistic and it is not a recombinant it is not a kind of a Thai. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-monotheistic and a recombinant it is not a kind of a Thai. sent4: if the globalization is non-recombinant but not a Njord then it is not a cabbage. sent5: if the globalization is both not monotheistic and not non-recombinant that it is not a Thai hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it is monotheistic and is not a kind of a recombinant it is not Thai. sent7: if the globalization is not monotheistic and it is not a recombinant it is a kind of a Thai. sent8: if something does not lumber and is not a Indonesian it does not urticate concert-goer. sent9: the globalization is not a kind of a contrarian if it is not a chaja and it is not a kind of a Thai. sent10: if the sclera is not stylish and is monotheistic then it is not easy. sent11: there is something such that if it is not anosmic and not an electric the fact that it is not a lumber is right. sent12: the globalization mounds gadabout if it is a kind of non-operationalist thing that is not a ADA-SCID. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not monotheistic and it is not a kind of a recombinant then it is a Thai. sent14: if the globalization is monotheistic but not a recombinant then it is not a kind of a Thai.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the salmonberry does not lumber and it is not Indonesian it does not urticate concert-goer.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is both not monotheistic and not a recombinant then it is not a Thai. ; $context$ = sent1: that the gadabout is not a caiman is true if it is not a biocatalyst and it is not a kind of a Thai. sent2: if the globalization is not monotheistic and it is not a recombinant it is not a kind of a Thai. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-monotheistic and a recombinant it is not a kind of a Thai. sent4: if the globalization is non-recombinant but not a Njord then it is not a cabbage. sent5: if the globalization is both not monotheistic and not non-recombinant that it is not a Thai hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it is monotheistic and is not a kind of a recombinant it is not Thai. sent7: if the globalization is not monotheistic and it is not a recombinant it is a kind of a Thai. sent8: if something does not lumber and is not a Indonesian it does not urticate concert-goer. sent9: the globalization is not a kind of a contrarian if it is not a chaja and it is not a kind of a Thai. sent10: if the sclera is not stylish and is monotheistic then it is not easy. sent11: there is something such that if it is not anosmic and not an electric the fact that it is not a lumber is right. sent12: the globalization mounds gadabout if it is a kind of non-operationalist thing that is not a ADA-SCID. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not monotheistic and it is not a kind of a recombinant then it is a Thai. sent14: if the globalization is monotheistic but not a recombinant then it is not a kind of a Thai. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__