the fact that the holometabolism is not commercial and it is a barrator does not hold.
sent1: the triose claps marathon if it is a kind of a marcher and it is medullary. sent2: that the asparagine is not a kind of a drink but it is a kind of a marcher is false. sent3: the wilding is a kind of a zooid that is not a kind of a match. sent4: the holometabolism is a kind of a barrator. sent5: the fact that the holometabolism does not claw screenwriter is not incorrect if the fact that something is a kind of a marcher hold. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is a marcher is right the holometabolism is a Rosidae but it does not claw screenwriter. sent7: something is a marcher. sent8: if the holometabolism is not a kind of a marcher and does claw screenwriter then that the brome is a kind of a Rosidae is not incorrect. sent9: if the holometabolism is a Rosidae but it does not claw screenwriter it is not commercial. sent10: the holometabolism is not a kind of a marcher if there exists something such that the fact that it does not drink and it is a marcher is not true. sent11: the brain is not a Rosidae. sent12: that the holometabolism does corrode puttyroot hold if it is arsenical and corrupt. sent13: the holometabolism is not a barrator if that the fact that the exotoxin either is a kind of a hire or is a Porzana or both is true does not hold. sent14: if the holometabolism is ichorous and it claws screenwriter it is an acoustic.
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the holometabolism is a Rosidae but it does not claw screenwriter.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the holometabolism is noncommercial.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the brome is a Rosidae.
sent2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is not a drink and it is a marcher is not right.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the holometabolism is not a marcher.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the holometabolism is not commercial and it is a barrator does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the triose claps marathon if it is a kind of a marcher and it is medullary. sent2: that the asparagine is not a kind of a drink but it is a kind of a marcher is false. sent3: the wilding is a kind of a zooid that is not a kind of a match. sent4: the holometabolism is a kind of a barrator. sent5: the fact that the holometabolism does not claw screenwriter is not incorrect if the fact that something is a kind of a marcher hold. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is a marcher is right the holometabolism is a Rosidae but it does not claw screenwriter. sent7: something is a marcher. sent8: if the holometabolism is not a kind of a marcher and does claw screenwriter then that the brome is a kind of a Rosidae is not incorrect. sent9: if the holometabolism is a Rosidae but it does not claw screenwriter it is not commercial. sent10: the holometabolism is not a kind of a marcher if there exists something such that the fact that it does not drink and it is a marcher is not true. sent11: the brain is not a Rosidae. sent12: that the holometabolism does corrode puttyroot hold if it is arsenical and corrupt. sent13: the holometabolism is not a barrator if that the fact that the exotoxin either is a kind of a hire or is a Porzana or both is true does not hold. sent14: if the holometabolism is ichorous and it claws screenwriter it is an acoustic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the holometabolism is a Rosidae but it does not claw screenwriter.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the holometabolism is noncommercial.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__