that the natterjack is not a kind of a spell or it does not present or both is incorrect.
sent1: if the episcopate is non-present that the natterjack is not a kind of a spell and/or it does not non-present is false. sent2: if that the farfalle is not a Maianthemum but it is an advanced is incorrect then the galley is not a kind of a Maianthemum. sent3: if the farfalle is a kind of a Doberman the fact that it is not a Maianthemum and is a kind of an advanced is wrong. sent4: something does not advance if the fact that it is Stravinskyan and it is not a wallah does not hold. sent5: the quartering is both a twenty-six and non-Gallican if it is not a grazing. sent6: that something is Stravinskyan but it is not a wallah is incorrect if it is not Gallican. sent7: something is not a Maianthemum if the fact that it consternates giantism and is not a kind of a Doberman does not hold. sent8: if something is not an advanced then that it does consternate giantism and is not a kind of a Doberman is not right. sent9: the fact that the episcopate does not present is right if that the fact that the quartering is not a Robert but it does strengthen syndactyly hold does not hold. sent10: the farfalle is a Doberman. sent11: if the quartering is not a kind of a Robert and strengthens syndactyly then the fact that the antimalarial does not consternate giantism is not false. sent12: the natterjack does not spell and/or is not a present if the quartering is not a Maianthemum. sent13: if the antimalarial does not consternate giantism the galley is a Maianthemum and does consternate giantism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quartering is not a Robert and does strengthen syndactyly.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the antimalarial does not consternate giantism.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the galley is a kind of a Maianthemum and it consternates giantism.; int2 -> int3: the galley is a Maianthemum.; sent3 & sent10 -> int4: that the farfalle is both not a Maianthemum and an advanced is wrong.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the galley is not a Maianthemum.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the quartering is not a kind of a Robert but it strengthens syndactyly is false.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the episcopate is not present.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the natterjack is not a kind of a spell and/or it is not a present.
sent7 -> int9: the quartering is not a Maianthemum if the fact that it does consternate giantism and it is not a Doberman is not right.; sent8 -> int10: if the quartering is not an advanced the fact that it consternates giantism and it is not a kind of a Doberman is not true.; sent4 -> int11: if the fact that the quartering is Stravinskyan but it is not a wallah does not hold it is not an advanced.; sent6 -> int12: that the fact that the quartering is Stravinskyan but it is not a wallah is not true hold if it is not Gallican.;
$hypothesis$ = that the natterjack is not a kind of a spell or it does not present or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the episcopate is non-present that the natterjack is not a kind of a spell and/or it does not non-present is false. sent2: if that the farfalle is not a Maianthemum but it is an advanced is incorrect then the galley is not a kind of a Maianthemum. sent3: if the farfalle is a kind of a Doberman the fact that it is not a Maianthemum and is a kind of an advanced is wrong. sent4: something does not advance if the fact that it is Stravinskyan and it is not a wallah does not hold. sent5: the quartering is both a twenty-six and non-Gallican if it is not a grazing. sent6: that something is Stravinskyan but it is not a wallah is incorrect if it is not Gallican. sent7: something is not a Maianthemum if the fact that it consternates giantism and is not a kind of a Doberman does not hold. sent8: if something is not an advanced then that it does consternate giantism and is not a kind of a Doberman is not right. sent9: the fact that the episcopate does not present is right if that the fact that the quartering is not a Robert but it does strengthen syndactyly hold does not hold. sent10: the farfalle is a Doberman. sent11: if the quartering is not a kind of a Robert and strengthens syndactyly then the fact that the antimalarial does not consternate giantism is not false. sent12: the natterjack does not spell and/or is not a present if the quartering is not a Maianthemum. sent13: if the antimalarial does not consternate giantism the galley is a Maianthemum and does consternate giantism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quartering is not a Robert and does strengthen syndactyly.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the antimalarial does not consternate giantism.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the galley is a kind of a Maianthemum and it consternates giantism.; int2 -> int3: the galley is a Maianthemum.; sent3 & sent10 -> int4: that the farfalle is both not a Maianthemum and an advanced is wrong.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the galley is not a Maianthemum.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the quartering is not a kind of a Robert but it strengthens syndactyly is false.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the episcopate is not present.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__