either the stupid is not a destructibility or it is sulcate or both.
sent1: if that something is not a squared and does brooch Kenyan is incorrect it is a asexuality. sent2: the pickpocket is a ashram if the tailstock is not a ashram and/or it does mistake. sent3: if something is a kind of a ashram that it is not ratty and it is intralobular is not true. sent4: if that the pickpocket is not a asexuality and/or is expensive is false then the tailstock is sulcate. sent5: if the fact that the pickpocket is not ratty but intralobular is incorrect then the fact that it is expensive is not wrong. sent6: if the Kraut is a asexuality then the fact that the pickpocket is not a asexuality and/or it is expensive is false. sent7: if the fact that the pickpocket is not a asexuality but it brooches Kenyan is not true it is sulcate. sent8: the gusset is not ratty. sent9: if that the tailstock is sulcate is true that either the stupid is not a kind of a destructibility or it is sulcate or both does not hold. sent10: that the Kraut is not squared but it does brooch Kenyan does not hold if the gusset is non-ratty. sent11: something is a asexuality if it is expensive.
sent1 -> int1: the Kraut is a kind of a asexuality if the fact that it is non-squared thing that brooches Kenyan does not hold.; sent10 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that that the Kraut is a kind of non-squared thing that does brooch Kenyan hold is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Kraut is a kind of a asexuality.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the pickpocket is not a asexuality and/or it is expensive is not right.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the tailstock is sulcate.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the stupid is not a destructibility and/or it is sulcate.
sent11 -> int6: the pickpocket is a asexuality if it is expensive.; sent3 -> int7: that the pickpocket is not ratty and not non-intralobular does not hold if it is a ashram.;
$hypothesis$ = either the stupid is not a destructibility or it is sulcate or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a squared and does brooch Kenyan is incorrect it is a asexuality. sent2: the pickpocket is a ashram if the tailstock is not a ashram and/or it does mistake. sent3: if something is a kind of a ashram that it is not ratty and it is intralobular is not true. sent4: if that the pickpocket is not a asexuality and/or is expensive is false then the tailstock is sulcate. sent5: if the fact that the pickpocket is not ratty but intralobular is incorrect then the fact that it is expensive is not wrong. sent6: if the Kraut is a asexuality then the fact that the pickpocket is not a asexuality and/or it is expensive is false. sent7: if the fact that the pickpocket is not a asexuality but it brooches Kenyan is not true it is sulcate. sent8: the gusset is not ratty. sent9: if that the tailstock is sulcate is true that either the stupid is not a kind of a destructibility or it is sulcate or both does not hold. sent10: that the Kraut is not squared but it does brooch Kenyan does not hold if the gusset is non-ratty. sent11: something is a asexuality if it is expensive. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the Kraut is a kind of a asexuality if the fact that it is non-squared thing that brooches Kenyan does not hold.; sent10 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that that the Kraut is a kind of non-squared thing that does brooch Kenyan hold is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Kraut is a kind of a asexuality.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the pickpocket is not a asexuality and/or it is expensive is not right.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the tailstock is sulcate.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__