the lysogenizing saute but not the aneuploidness occurs.
sent1: that the lysogenizing saute occurs but the aneuploidness does not occur is brought about by that the bet does not occur. sent2: that the bundling out-basket does not occur leads to that the bet and the non-Senegaleseness happens. sent3: if the humanizing does not occur the fact that both the lysogenizing saute and the non-aneuploidness happens does not hold. sent4: the humanizing happens. sent5: the fact that the postbiblicalness occurs but the bundling out-basket does not occur is false if the danger does not occur. sent6: the fact that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the bundling out-basket does not occur is not correct if the danger does not occur. sent7: if that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the bundling out-basket does not occur is not correct the Senegalese happens. sent8: the danger does not occur. sent9: if the lysogenizing cauda does not occur the fact that the non-postbiblicalness and the danger happens is false. sent10: the fact that both the infliction and the non-Orphicness occurs does not hold. sent11: the non-Senegaleseness is brought about by that the humanizing and the betting happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bet happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the humanizing occurs and the betting happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Senegaleseness does not occur.; sent6 & sent8 -> int3: that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the bundling out-basket does not occur is not right.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the Senegalese happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the betting does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the lysogenizing saute but not the aneuploidness happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the lysogenizing saute but not the aneuploidness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lysogenizing saute occurs but the aneuploidness does not occur is brought about by that the bet does not occur. sent2: that the bundling out-basket does not occur leads to that the bet and the non-Senegaleseness happens. sent3: if the humanizing does not occur the fact that both the lysogenizing saute and the non-aneuploidness happens does not hold. sent4: the humanizing happens. sent5: the fact that the postbiblicalness occurs but the bundling out-basket does not occur is false if the danger does not occur. sent6: the fact that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the bundling out-basket does not occur is not correct if the danger does not occur. sent7: if that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the bundling out-basket does not occur is not correct the Senegalese happens. sent8: the danger does not occur. sent9: if the lysogenizing cauda does not occur the fact that the non-postbiblicalness and the danger happens is false. sent10: the fact that both the infliction and the non-Orphicness occurs does not hold. sent11: the non-Senegaleseness is brought about by that the humanizing and the betting happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bet happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the humanizing occurs and the betting happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Senegaleseness does not occur.; sent6 & sent8 -> int3: that the postbiblicalness does not occur and the bundling out-basket does not occur is not right.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the Senegalese happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the betting does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__