if the fact that the pachuco is not a sputnik and it does not send Orangeman is incorrect then the whooper romanticizes.
sent1: there is something such that it does not snowball pachuco. sent2: something is a kind of a Donatism that does snowball pachuco. sent3: the fact that the pachuco is not a kind of a sputnik but it sends Orangeman is not correct. sent4: the saurian is a kind of a Donatism. sent5: the pachuco sends Orangeman if something that does consternate Natchez does not snowball pachuco. sent6: the saurian is a kind of a Donatism but it does not snowball pachuco if the timothy does not consternate Natchez. sent7: something is a Donatism but it does not consternate Natchez. sent8: the saurian is a Donatism if the timothy does not consternate Natchez. sent9: something does reissue sandlot but it is not a sputnik if it is not a Donatism. sent10: that if the pachuco is not a sputnik and does not send Orangeman then the whooper romanticizes hold. sent11: if the fact that that the pachuco is not a sputnik and it does not send Orangeman does not hold hold the timothy does not consternate Natchez. sent12: if the pachuco does not romanticize the whooper is a kind of a sputnik and does not send Orangeman. sent13: the saurian is a sputnik if the fact that the whooper does not romanticize and it is not a Donatism is not right. sent14: the pachuco is a sputnik. sent15: something is variolar and not inoperative if it is a Donatism. sent16: that the saurian does not romanticize hold. sent17: if the pachuco is not a kind of a sputnik and does not send Orangeman the timothy does not consternate Natchez. sent18: if that something does consternate Natchez is not false then it is a Donatism. sent19: the fact that that the pachuco is a sputnik and does not send Orangeman is not correct is right. sent20: the pachuco consternates Natchez if the timothy snowballs pachuco. sent21: something is a kind of a Donatism. sent22: the pachuco does send Orangeman.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pachuco is not a sputnik and it does not send Orangeman is false.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the timothy does not consternate Natchez.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the saurian is a Donatism but it does not snowball pachuco.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a Donatism and it does not snowball pachuco.;
the halon reissues sandlot and is not a sputnik.
sent9 -> int4: the halon does reissue sandlot but it is not a kind of a sputnik if the fact that it is not a Donatism is right.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the pachuco is not a sputnik and it does not send Orangeman is incorrect then the whooper romanticizes. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does not snowball pachuco. sent2: something is a kind of a Donatism that does snowball pachuco. sent3: the fact that the pachuco is not a kind of a sputnik but it sends Orangeman is not correct. sent4: the saurian is a kind of a Donatism. sent5: the pachuco sends Orangeman if something that does consternate Natchez does not snowball pachuco. sent6: the saurian is a kind of a Donatism but it does not snowball pachuco if the timothy does not consternate Natchez. sent7: something is a Donatism but it does not consternate Natchez. sent8: the saurian is a Donatism if the timothy does not consternate Natchez. sent9: something does reissue sandlot but it is not a sputnik if it is not a Donatism. sent10: that if the pachuco is not a sputnik and does not send Orangeman then the whooper romanticizes hold. sent11: if the fact that that the pachuco is not a sputnik and it does not send Orangeman does not hold hold the timothy does not consternate Natchez. sent12: if the pachuco does not romanticize the whooper is a kind of a sputnik and does not send Orangeman. sent13: the saurian is a sputnik if the fact that the whooper does not romanticize and it is not a Donatism is not right. sent14: the pachuco is a sputnik. sent15: something is variolar and not inoperative if it is a Donatism. sent16: that the saurian does not romanticize hold. sent17: if the pachuco is not a kind of a sputnik and does not send Orangeman the timothy does not consternate Natchez. sent18: if that something does consternate Natchez is not false then it is a Donatism. sent19: the fact that that the pachuco is a sputnik and does not send Orangeman is not correct is right. sent20: the pachuco consternates Natchez if the timothy snowballs pachuco. sent21: something is a kind of a Donatism. sent22: the pachuco does send Orangeman. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pachuco is not a sputnik and it does not send Orangeman is false.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the timothy does not consternate Natchez.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the saurian is a Donatism but it does not snowball pachuco.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a Donatism and it does not snowball pachuco.; __UNKNOWN__