something is a maleficence and it does purify tufa.
sent1: the triclinium does purify remittance and is short-order. sent2: there is something such that it purifies comprehensibility. sent3: the stoker is short-order if the fact that the creeper does not purify tufa and is not a maleficence does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is eudemonic is not wrong. sent5: something does not change or it is Ebionite or both if it does not purify aftertaste. sent6: the creeper is not eudemonic but it is a hexenbesen if it vaults Areopagite. sent7: if something is not eudemonic the fact that it does not purify tufa and it is not a maleficence is not right. sent8: the creeper is a Guatemalan and eudemonic. sent9: the stoker is irremediable if the fact that the vegetable is a kind of an appendectomy hold. sent10: the vegetable is an appendectomy if the apricot is not an appendectomy but it is a Caddo. sent11: the creeper is a kind of a legitimation. sent12: the apricot is not an appendectomy and is a Caddo if the purchase does not change. sent13: if the creeper is not short-order the fact that it is a kind of a maleficence is correct. sent14: something does not change if it is not a change or not non-Ebionite or both. sent15: the fact that the creeper is eudemonic and it does purify tufa is correct. sent16: the creeper is not short-order. sent17: there is something such that it purifies tufa. sent18: there is something such that it is not elegant.
sent13 & sent16 -> int1: the creeper is a maleficence.; sent15 -> int2: the creeper purifies tufa.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the creeper is a maleficence and does purify tufa.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the stoker is short-order and it is irremediable.
sent7 -> int4: if the creeper is non-eudemonic then the fact that it does not purify tufa and is not a maleficence does not hold.; sent14 -> int5: if the purchase is not a change or is Ebionite or both then it does not change.; sent5 -> int6: the purchase is not a change or Ebionite or both if it does not purify aftertaste.;
$hypothesis$ = something is a maleficence and it does purify tufa. ; $context$ = sent1: the triclinium does purify remittance and is short-order. sent2: there is something such that it purifies comprehensibility. sent3: the stoker is short-order if the fact that the creeper does not purify tufa and is not a maleficence does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is eudemonic is not wrong. sent5: something does not change or it is Ebionite or both if it does not purify aftertaste. sent6: the creeper is not eudemonic but it is a hexenbesen if it vaults Areopagite. sent7: if something is not eudemonic the fact that it does not purify tufa and it is not a maleficence is not right. sent8: the creeper is a Guatemalan and eudemonic. sent9: the stoker is irremediable if the fact that the vegetable is a kind of an appendectomy hold. sent10: the vegetable is an appendectomy if the apricot is not an appendectomy but it is a Caddo. sent11: the creeper is a kind of a legitimation. sent12: the apricot is not an appendectomy and is a Caddo if the purchase does not change. sent13: if the creeper is not short-order the fact that it is a kind of a maleficence is correct. sent14: something does not change if it is not a change or not non-Ebionite or both. sent15: the fact that the creeper is eudemonic and it does purify tufa is correct. sent16: the creeper is not short-order. sent17: there is something such that it purifies tufa. sent18: there is something such that it is not elegant. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent16 -> int1: the creeper is a maleficence.; sent15 -> int2: the creeper purifies tufa.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the creeper is a maleficence and does purify tufa.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__