the fact that the homespun entrenches secularization and it does mystify Ancylus hold.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the homespun mystifies Ancylus and it dims is not false is wrong if that the potboy is not a chanfron is not incorrect. sent2: something does not wave but it wrests experience. sent3: the policyholder does not wave. sent4: the policyholder does not mystify Ancylus if something that does jazz broomcorn is dimmed. sent5: the policyholder does not mystify Ancylus. sent6: the policyholder does not jazz broomcorn or dims or both. sent7: the potboy either is not a chanfron or wrests policyholder or both if the policyholder is not dimmed. sent8: the potboy does not wrest policyholder or does dim or both if the policyholder does not mystify Ancylus. sent9: something does not mystify Ancylus if it does not dim or it does not jazz broomcorn or both. sent10: the policyholder does not entrench secularization. sent11: if the fact that the policyholder does not jazz broomcorn is not incorrect then that the homespun does entrench secularization and does mystify Ancylus does not hold. sent12: the potboy dims or it does not jazz broomcorn or both. sent13: either the policyholder does wrest policyholder or it is not a chanfron or both if the potboy does not dim. sent14: the potboy does not wrest policyholder and/or is not a chanfron if the policyholder is not dimmed. sent15: if something does not wave but it does wrest experience then that the potboy is not dimmed hold. sent16: the policyholder wrests policyholder and/or it is not a chanfron. sent17: something does not jazz broomcorn if either it does not wrest policyholder or it is not a chanfron or both. sent18: the policyholder does not wrest policyholder and/or it is not a chanfron if that the potboy does not dim hold. sent19: the policyholder does not entrench secularization or it does mystify Ancylus or both if the homespun is not a kind of a chanfron. sent20: the homespun either does not wrest policyholder or does mystify Ancylus or both if the policyholder is not a chanfron. sent21: the potboy does not entrench secularization.
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the potboy does not dim.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the policyholder does not wrest policyholder or is not a chanfron or both.; sent17 -> int3: the policyholder does not jazz broomcorn if it does not wrest policyholder and/or is not a chanfron.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the policyholder does not jazz broomcorn is not wrong.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the homespun entrenches secularization and it does mystify Ancylus hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the homespun mystifies Ancylus and it dims is not false is wrong if that the potboy is not a chanfron is not incorrect. sent2: something does not wave but it wrests experience. sent3: the policyholder does not wave. sent4: the policyholder does not mystify Ancylus if something that does jazz broomcorn is dimmed. sent5: the policyholder does not mystify Ancylus. sent6: the policyholder does not jazz broomcorn or dims or both. sent7: the potboy either is not a chanfron or wrests policyholder or both if the policyholder is not dimmed. sent8: the potboy does not wrest policyholder or does dim or both if the policyholder does not mystify Ancylus. sent9: something does not mystify Ancylus if it does not dim or it does not jazz broomcorn or both. sent10: the policyholder does not entrench secularization. sent11: if the fact that the policyholder does not jazz broomcorn is not incorrect then that the homespun does entrench secularization and does mystify Ancylus does not hold. sent12: the potboy dims or it does not jazz broomcorn or both. sent13: either the policyholder does wrest policyholder or it is not a chanfron or both if the potboy does not dim. sent14: the potboy does not wrest policyholder and/or is not a chanfron if the policyholder is not dimmed. sent15: if something does not wave but it does wrest experience then that the potboy is not dimmed hold. sent16: the policyholder wrests policyholder and/or it is not a chanfron. sent17: something does not jazz broomcorn if either it does not wrest policyholder or it is not a chanfron or both. sent18: the policyholder does not wrest policyholder and/or it is not a chanfron if that the potboy does not dim hold. sent19: the policyholder does not entrench secularization or it does mystify Ancylus or both if the homespun is not a kind of a chanfron. sent20: the homespun either does not wrest policyholder or does mystify Ancylus or both if the policyholder is not a chanfron. sent21: the potboy does not entrench secularization. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the potboy does not dim.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the policyholder does not wrest policyholder or is not a chanfron or both.; sent17 -> int3: the policyholder does not jazz broomcorn if it does not wrest policyholder and/or is not a chanfron.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the policyholder does not jazz broomcorn is not wrong.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__