the domicile is not non-shorts.
sent1: if the domicile does not hunger squeal and does not construct demureness the julep is unrealistic. sent2: the julep constructs demureness. sent3: if something is a Masonite then it is a shorts. sent4: if the julep constructs demureness then it does hunger squeal. sent5: if the hilt does hunger joke it hungers divorced and it is not a Masonite. sent6: the domicile is a kind of a shorts if it hungers cob. sent7: that the domicile does sweat is not incorrect if there exists something such that the fact that it is shorts thing that is a Masonite is incorrect. sent8: the julep does hunger divorced. sent9: if the hilt is an oboe it hungers joke. sent10: the repressor is shorts. sent11: there is something such that it is a sweat. sent12: if the julep does hunger divorced then it does sweat. sent13: if the fact that something does not hunger joke and does hunger divorced is incorrect it is neurobiological. sent14: the julep is not a sweat if the hilt is not a Masonite. sent15: The divorced does hunger julep. sent16: The demureness constructs julep. sent17: that the WMD is a shorts and it is a kind of a Masonite is not true.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the julep hungers squeal.; sent12 & sent8 -> int2: that the julep sweats is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the julep does hunger squeal and it sweats.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it hungers squeal and does sweat.; sent3 -> int5: the domicile is a kind of a shorts if it is a kind of a Masonite.;
something is neurobiological and it is unrealistic.
sent17 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is both a shorts and a Masonite is incorrect.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the domicile is a sweat.; sent13 -> int8: the hilt is neurobiological if the fact that it does not hunger joke and hungers divorced does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the domicile is not non-shorts. ; $context$ = sent1: if the domicile does not hunger squeal and does not construct demureness the julep is unrealistic. sent2: the julep constructs demureness. sent3: if something is a Masonite then it is a shorts. sent4: if the julep constructs demureness then it does hunger squeal. sent5: if the hilt does hunger joke it hungers divorced and it is not a Masonite. sent6: the domicile is a kind of a shorts if it hungers cob. sent7: that the domicile does sweat is not incorrect if there exists something such that the fact that it is shorts thing that is a Masonite is incorrect. sent8: the julep does hunger divorced. sent9: if the hilt is an oboe it hungers joke. sent10: the repressor is shorts. sent11: there is something such that it is a sweat. sent12: if the julep does hunger divorced then it does sweat. sent13: if the fact that something does not hunger joke and does hunger divorced is incorrect it is neurobiological. sent14: the julep is not a sweat if the hilt is not a Masonite. sent15: The divorced does hunger julep. sent16: The demureness constructs julep. sent17: that the WMD is a shorts and it is a kind of a Masonite is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the julep hungers squeal.; sent12 & sent8 -> int2: that the julep sweats is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the julep does hunger squeal and it sweats.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it hungers squeal and does sweat.; sent3 -> int5: the domicile is a kind of a shorts if it is a kind of a Masonite.; __UNKNOWN__