the Boswell is a galvanization but it is not a kind of a Hollywood.
sent1: if the sweet is both pupillary and not acoustic it is not anamnestic. sent2: the sweet does not depressurize Rosa. sent3: if something is not bacteriolytic then it apprehends and is not a kind of a Dendromecon. sent4: if something is not a chert then it is a kind of a galvanization that is not a Hollywood. sent5: the sweet is pupillary but it is not acoustic if the subnormal is not a kind of an acoustic. sent6: something is not a kind of a chert if the fact that it is a kind of a court is not correct. sent7: if the Boswell does urinate then the subnormal is non-acoustic. sent8: The Rosa does not depressurize sweet. sent9: the sweet is anamnestic and it does credit covert if it does not depressurize Rosa. sent10: if the Boswell does court that it is a backing and it does not urinate is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Boswell is a court.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the Boswell backs but it does not urinate does not hold.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the sweet is anamnestic and does credit covert.; int2 -> int3: the sweet is anamnestic.; sent6 -> int4: if the Boswell does not court it is not a chert.; sent4 -> int5: if the Boswell is not a chert then it is a galvanization and it is not Hollywood.;
that if the gasket is not bacteriolytic then the gasket does apprehend and is not a Dendromecon is correct.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Boswell is a galvanization but it is not a kind of a Hollywood. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sweet is both pupillary and not acoustic it is not anamnestic. sent2: the sweet does not depressurize Rosa. sent3: if something is not bacteriolytic then it apprehends and is not a kind of a Dendromecon. sent4: if something is not a chert then it is a kind of a galvanization that is not a Hollywood. sent5: the sweet is pupillary but it is not acoustic if the subnormal is not a kind of an acoustic. sent6: something is not a kind of a chert if the fact that it is a kind of a court is not correct. sent7: if the Boswell does urinate then the subnormal is non-acoustic. sent8: The Rosa does not depressurize sweet. sent9: the sweet is anamnestic and it does credit covert if it does not depressurize Rosa. sent10: if the Boswell does court that it is a backing and it does not urinate is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Boswell is a court.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the Boswell backs but it does not urinate does not hold.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the sweet is anamnestic and does credit covert.; int2 -> int3: the sweet is anamnestic.; sent6 -> int4: if the Boswell does not court it is not a chert.; sent4 -> int5: if the Boswell is not a chert then it is a galvanization and it is not Hollywood.; __UNKNOWN__