the garnishee is photographic.
sent1: the garnishee is not dystopian if the hydroxychloroquine does not queue garnishee and/or it is not intradepartmental. sent2: the infiltration does not knot disequilibrium but it is bolographic if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Gliridae. sent3: the garnishee is pyrogallic and/or it is not a photojournalism if it is not dystopian. sent4: the garnishee is photographic if it is pyrogallic and/or it is not a photojournalism. sent5: there exists something such that it is a Gliridae. sent6: the hydroxychloroquine does not queue garnishee if that the fact that the infiltration is hypotensive and it is a five-hitter is not correct is not wrong. sent7: that something is both a hypotensive and a five-hitter does not hold if it does not knot disequilibrium.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the infiltration does not knot disequilibrium and is bolographic.; int1 -> int2: the infiltration does not knot disequilibrium.; sent7 -> int3: if the infiltration does not knot disequilibrium then that it is a kind of a hypotensive and it is a five-hitter is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the infiltration is a kind of a hypotensive that is a kind of a five-hitter is wrong.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the hydroxychloroquine does not queue garnishee.; int5 -> int6: the hydroxychloroquine does not queue garnishee or is not intradepartmental or both.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the garnishee is not dystopian.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the garnishee is pyrogallic or it is not a photojournalism or both.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the garnishee is photographic. ; $context$ = sent1: the garnishee is not dystopian if the hydroxychloroquine does not queue garnishee and/or it is not intradepartmental. sent2: the infiltration does not knot disequilibrium but it is bolographic if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Gliridae. sent3: the garnishee is pyrogallic and/or it is not a photojournalism if it is not dystopian. sent4: the garnishee is photographic if it is pyrogallic and/or it is not a photojournalism. sent5: there exists something such that it is a Gliridae. sent6: the hydroxychloroquine does not queue garnishee if that the fact that the infiltration is hypotensive and it is a five-hitter is not correct is not wrong. sent7: that something is both a hypotensive and a five-hitter does not hold if it does not knot disequilibrium. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the infiltration does not knot disequilibrium and is bolographic.; int1 -> int2: the infiltration does not knot disequilibrium.; sent7 -> int3: if the infiltration does not knot disequilibrium then that it is a kind of a hypotensive and it is a five-hitter is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the infiltration is a kind of a hypotensive that is a kind of a five-hitter is wrong.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the hydroxychloroquine does not queue garnishee.; int5 -> int6: the hydroxychloroquine does not queue garnishee or is not intradepartmental or both.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the garnishee is not dystopian.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the garnishee is pyrogallic or it is not a photojournalism or both.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__