that both the unneuroticness and the non-Newtonianness happens is not correct.
sent1: if the paternalness does not occur then the Mercurialness occurs and the dissociation occurs. sent2: that the fact that the roundup but not the irradiating occurs is right is not right if that the uncommonness happens hold. sent3: if the dissociation happens then that both the postmenopausalness and the non-glabellarness occurs is false. sent4: the fact that the postmenopausalness and the glabellarness happens does not hold. sent5: the native does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the pacing does not occur is not wrong then that the unneuroticness happens and the Newtonian does not occur is correct. sent7: that both the paternalness and the jostle happens is false if that the dissociation does not occur hold. sent8: that the postmenopausalness but not the glabellarness occurs is caused by that the surveying does not occur. sent9: the surveying does not occur. sent10: the fact that the pacing does not occur is not incorrect if that the paternalness and the jostle occurs is not true. sent11: that both the sanitariness and the cleistogamousness occurs is false if the unorthodoxness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dissociation happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the postmenopausalness but not the glabellarness happens does not hold.; sent8 & sent9 -> int2: the postmenopausalness and the non-glabellarness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dissociation does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the paternalness and the jostle occurs is true is wrong.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the pacing does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the Mercurialness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that both the unneuroticness and the non-Newtonianness happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the paternalness does not occur then the Mercurialness occurs and the dissociation occurs. sent2: that the fact that the roundup but not the irradiating occurs is right is not right if that the uncommonness happens hold. sent3: if the dissociation happens then that both the postmenopausalness and the non-glabellarness occurs is false. sent4: the fact that the postmenopausalness and the glabellarness happens does not hold. sent5: the native does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the pacing does not occur is not wrong then that the unneuroticness happens and the Newtonian does not occur is correct. sent7: that both the paternalness and the jostle happens is false if that the dissociation does not occur hold. sent8: that the postmenopausalness but not the glabellarness occurs is caused by that the surveying does not occur. sent9: the surveying does not occur. sent10: the fact that the pacing does not occur is not incorrect if that the paternalness and the jostle occurs is not true. sent11: that both the sanitariness and the cleistogamousness occurs is false if the unorthodoxness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dissociation happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the postmenopausalness but not the glabellarness happens does not hold.; sent8 & sent9 -> int2: the postmenopausalness and the non-glabellarness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dissociation does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the paternalness and the jostle occurs is true is wrong.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the pacing does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__