the ketch is not a arced.
sent1: the banjo is propitious if the chigoe is a kind of a diffidence. sent2: if something cascades Lehar it is cadastral. sent3: the melancholy is a diffidence. sent4: the tallyman is a kind of a diffidence and it is fragrant. sent5: the banjo is a washout. sent6: there are Jacobean and bettering things. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is Jacobean thing that is bettering is wrong then the melancholy cascades Lehar. sent8: something is a kind of a arced or it cascades Lehar or both if the fact that it is not cadastral is not wrong. sent9: that the melancholy does not cascade ketch is not false. sent10: if the melancholy is a kind of a washout the chigoe is a diffidence. sent11: that the chigoe is not cadastral hold if the banjo is not a diffidence and is a kind of a washout. sent12: if the melancholy is a diffidence then the chigoe is cadastral. sent13: if something is atheistic it is migratory. sent14: the fact that the banjo is an oppressor hold. sent15: that the ketch is a diffidence is not wrong. sent16: the melancholy is not cadastral if that the chigoe is not cadastral hold. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is an oppressor and it cascades Lehar does not hold then the melancholy is propitious. sent18: the ketch is bettering. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Jacobean that does better is incorrect. sent20: something is a washout if it is cadastral. sent21: the melancholy is a arced if the ketch is cadastral. sent22: there is something such that that it cascades Lehar and is a arced is not true. sent23: if the banjo is a arced the ketch is propitious. sent24: the melancholy is a bettering. sent25: if there is something such that it is not a Jacobean then the melancholy cascades Lehar. sent26: the banjo is a arced if there is something such that that it is an oppressor that is a diffidence is wrong. sent27: the ketch is not a arced if the banjo is propitious and it is an oppressor.
sent19 & sent7 -> int1: the melancholy does cascade Lehar.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the melancholy is cadastral if the melancholy does cascade Lehar is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the melancholy is cadastral.; sent20 -> int4: if the melancholy is cadastral then it is a washout.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the melancholy is a washout.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the chigoe is a diffidence.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the banjo is propitious.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the fact that the banjo is propitious and it is an oppressor hold.; int8 & sent27 -> hypothesis;
the ketch is a arced.
sent8 -> int9: the melancholy either is a arced or does cascade Lehar or both if that it is not cadastral is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the ketch is not a arced. ; $context$ = sent1: the banjo is propitious if the chigoe is a kind of a diffidence. sent2: if something cascades Lehar it is cadastral. sent3: the melancholy is a diffidence. sent4: the tallyman is a kind of a diffidence and it is fragrant. sent5: the banjo is a washout. sent6: there are Jacobean and bettering things. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is Jacobean thing that is bettering is wrong then the melancholy cascades Lehar. sent8: something is a kind of a arced or it cascades Lehar or both if the fact that it is not cadastral is not wrong. sent9: that the melancholy does not cascade ketch is not false. sent10: if the melancholy is a kind of a washout the chigoe is a diffidence. sent11: that the chigoe is not cadastral hold if the banjo is not a diffidence and is a kind of a washout. sent12: if the melancholy is a diffidence then the chigoe is cadastral. sent13: if something is atheistic it is migratory. sent14: the fact that the banjo is an oppressor hold. sent15: that the ketch is a diffidence is not wrong. sent16: the melancholy is not cadastral if that the chigoe is not cadastral hold. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is an oppressor and it cascades Lehar does not hold then the melancholy is propitious. sent18: the ketch is bettering. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Jacobean that does better is incorrect. sent20: something is a washout if it is cadastral. sent21: the melancholy is a arced if the ketch is cadastral. sent22: there is something such that that it cascades Lehar and is a arced is not true. sent23: if the banjo is a arced the ketch is propitious. sent24: the melancholy is a bettering. sent25: if there is something such that it is not a Jacobean then the melancholy cascades Lehar. sent26: the banjo is a arced if there is something such that that it is an oppressor that is a diffidence is wrong. sent27: the ketch is not a arced if the banjo is propitious and it is an oppressor. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent7 -> int1: the melancholy does cascade Lehar.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the melancholy is cadastral if the melancholy does cascade Lehar is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the melancholy is cadastral.; sent20 -> int4: if the melancholy is cadastral then it is a washout.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the melancholy is a washout.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the chigoe is a diffidence.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the banjo is propitious.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the fact that the banjo is propitious and it is an oppressor hold.; int8 & sent27 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__