the fact that there is something such that if it does not miss and it is not a rustling it is not deep is right.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it does not loom slatternliness and it is not seamless is not incorrect the fact that it is not a dissipation is not incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a miss and is a rustling it is not a kind of a deep. sent3: there is something such that if it is a miss and it does not rustle the fact that it is not deep is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not loom protectorship and does not loom slatternliness then it is not a lifeline. sent5: if something that is not insolvent does not void eaglet that it is non-subsonic hold. sent6: if something is both not a miss and a rustling it is not a deep. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a miss and it is not a kind of a rustling then that it is a kind of a deep hold. sent8: the poteen is not a kind of a deep if it is a kind of a miss and is not a kind of a rustling. sent9: if something is a kind of a miss that does not rustle it is not a deep. sent10: if something is not pathological and it does not loom shiftlessness then it does not void retrospect. sent11: the CRP does not cane mendacity if it is not a miss and it is not petalous. sent12: the poteen does not loom gadolinium if it is not a tailpiece and does not boycott. sent13: the poteen is non-deep if it is not a miss and it is a rustling. sent14: the poteen does not transmit if it is non-bivariate thing that is not myrmecophytic. sent15: the poteen is not mortal if it is not a kind of a Luxemburger and it is not a rustling. sent16: the poteen is a kind of a deep if it is not a kind of a miss and it is not a rustling. sent17: if something is not coccal and it does not elute tetraskelion then it does not cane poteen. sent18: something is a kind of a deep if it is not a miss and it does not rustle.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not miss and it is not a rustling it is not deep is right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it does not loom slatternliness and it is not seamless is not incorrect the fact that it is not a dissipation is not incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a miss and is a rustling it is not a kind of a deep. sent3: there is something such that if it is a miss and it does not rustle the fact that it is not deep is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not loom protectorship and does not loom slatternliness then it is not a lifeline. sent5: if something that is not insolvent does not void eaglet that it is non-subsonic hold. sent6: if something is both not a miss and a rustling it is not a deep. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a miss and it is not a kind of a rustling then that it is a kind of a deep hold. sent8: the poteen is not a kind of a deep if it is a kind of a miss and is not a kind of a rustling. sent9: if something is a kind of a miss that does not rustle it is not a deep. sent10: if something is not pathological and it does not loom shiftlessness then it does not void retrospect. sent11: the CRP does not cane mendacity if it is not a miss and it is not petalous. sent12: the poteen does not loom gadolinium if it is not a tailpiece and does not boycott. sent13: the poteen is non-deep if it is not a miss and it is a rustling. sent14: the poteen does not transmit if it is non-bivariate thing that is not myrmecophytic. sent15: the poteen is not mortal if it is not a kind of a Luxemburger and it is not a rustling. sent16: the poteen is a kind of a deep if it is not a kind of a miss and it is not a rustling. sent17: if something is not coccal and it does not elute tetraskelion then it does not cane poteen. sent18: something is a kind of a deep if it is not a miss and it does not rustle. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__