the fact that the serotine is a kind of a inclemency but it is not paleoanthropological is right.
sent1: something is a kind of a inclemency if it does flesh Scotswoman. sent2: that the serotine does flesh Scotswoman hold if there is something such that that it is not a wedge and it does mythologize Chrysolophus is wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Khuen and it is birefringent is wrong then the Scotswoman mythologizes Chrysolophus. sent4: if the serotine is not illogical then it is morphophonemics and is not paleoanthropological. sent5: if the serotine is not illogical it is thermostatics. sent6: the serotine fleshes Scotswoman if something does not mythologize Chrysolophus. sent7: the serotine is not illogical. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a inclemency and it is paleoanthropological is incorrect. sent9: something is not a wedge and does mythologize Chrysolophus. sent10: the serotine is not priestly. sent11: the fact that something is not morphophonemics but it is a inclemency is not right if it does flesh Scotswoman. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not flesh Scotswoman and it is morphophonemics is not true.
sent1 -> int1: the serotine is a kind of a inclemency if it fleshes Scotswoman.; sent4 & sent7 -> int2: the serotine is both morphophonemics and not paleoanthropological.; int2 -> int3: the serotine is not paleoanthropological.;
that the serotine is both a inclemency and not paleoanthropological is not correct.
sent11 -> int4: the fact that that the doorframe is both non-morphophonemics and a inclemency is correct is incorrect if it does flesh Scotswoman.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the serotine is a kind of a inclemency but it is not paleoanthropological is right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a inclemency if it does flesh Scotswoman. sent2: that the serotine does flesh Scotswoman hold if there is something such that that it is not a wedge and it does mythologize Chrysolophus is wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Khuen and it is birefringent is wrong then the Scotswoman mythologizes Chrysolophus. sent4: if the serotine is not illogical then it is morphophonemics and is not paleoanthropological. sent5: if the serotine is not illogical it is thermostatics. sent6: the serotine fleshes Scotswoman if something does not mythologize Chrysolophus. sent7: the serotine is not illogical. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a inclemency and it is paleoanthropological is incorrect. sent9: something is not a wedge and does mythologize Chrysolophus. sent10: the serotine is not priestly. sent11: the fact that something is not morphophonemics but it is a inclemency is not right if it does flesh Scotswoman. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not flesh Scotswoman and it is morphophonemics is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the serotine is a kind of a inclemency if it fleshes Scotswoman.; sent4 & sent7 -> int2: the serotine is both morphophonemics and not paleoanthropological.; int2 -> int3: the serotine is not paleoanthropological.; __UNKNOWN__