there exists something such that if that it is not metastatic is correct then the fact that that it is antithyroid and it is not a subdivision is correct does not hold.
sent1: if that something is not metastatic is not wrong that it is antithyroid and it is a subdivision is false. sent2: there is something such that if it is not metastatic then that it is antithyroid and it is a subdivision does not hold. sent3: if something is not metastatic it is antithyroid and not a subdivision. sent4: if something is metastatic that it is both antithyroid and not a subdivision does not hold. sent5: that something is barometric and is not pectic does not hold if it is not impotent. sent6: if the funnel does not tinge funnel it is both a capful and not metastatic. sent7: a non-perithelial thing is a kind of a mimicry that is not imperishable. sent8: there is something such that if it is not metastatic then it is antithyroid and not a subdivision. sent9: if the funnel is not metastatic then the fact that it is antithyroid and it is a subdivision does not hold. sent10: the fact that the funnel is antithyroid but it is not a subdivision is incorrect if it is metastatic. sent11: there is something such that if it does not bow conciseness then it tinges Orr and it is not a labial. sent12: the poster is metastatic but it is not a halcyon if it is not a hide. sent13: the fact that something is pectic and is not barometric is false if it is not a Anomalopidae. sent14: the fact that there is something such that if it is metastatic then the fact that it is both antithyroid and not a subdivision is false is right. sent15: there exists something such that if it dissembles the fact that it is liberal but not Mandaean does not hold. sent16: the funnel is antithyroid but it is not a subdivision if it is not metastatic.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not metastatic is correct then the fact that that it is antithyroid and it is not a subdivision is correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not metastatic is not wrong that it is antithyroid and it is a subdivision is false. sent2: there is something such that if it is not metastatic then that it is antithyroid and it is a subdivision does not hold. sent3: if something is not metastatic it is antithyroid and not a subdivision. sent4: if something is metastatic that it is both antithyroid and not a subdivision does not hold. sent5: that something is barometric and is not pectic does not hold if it is not impotent. sent6: if the funnel does not tinge funnel it is both a capful and not metastatic. sent7: a non-perithelial thing is a kind of a mimicry that is not imperishable. sent8: there is something such that if it is not metastatic then it is antithyroid and not a subdivision. sent9: if the funnel is not metastatic then the fact that it is antithyroid and it is a subdivision does not hold. sent10: the fact that the funnel is antithyroid but it is not a subdivision is incorrect if it is metastatic. sent11: there is something such that if it does not bow conciseness then it tinges Orr and it is not a labial. sent12: the poster is metastatic but it is not a halcyon if it is not a hide. sent13: the fact that something is pectic and is not barometric is false if it is not a Anomalopidae. sent14: the fact that there is something such that if it is metastatic then the fact that it is both antithyroid and not a subdivision is false is right. sent15: there exists something such that if it dissembles the fact that it is liberal but not Mandaean does not hold. sent16: the funnel is antithyroid but it is not a subdivision if it is not metastatic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__