the fact that there is something such that it is not a primitivism does not hold.
sent1: that the SLS is not a primitivism and does not silence radian does not hold if it is an antibiotic. sent2: the spicule does not quintuple bottomland if that the spermatophyte is not iridaceous or it does not scour Boehmenism or both does not hold. sent3: the plankton is not a formaldehyde if the spermatophyte does not scour Boehmenism. sent4: that the plankton is inappropriate and it does quintuple bottomland is not correct if something is a formaldehyde. sent5: the plankton is a formaldehyde and it does silence radian. sent6: there is something such that that it stems and/or it does not quintuple Mayenne does not hold. sent7: the spermatophyte is not non-appellate. sent8: if the SLS is appellate then that the spicule is not a formaldehyde but it is a polymastigote does not hold. sent9: the spermatophyte scours Boehmenism. sent10: if the fact that something is appellate and is not a polymastigote is not right it is not a primitivism. sent11: that the SLS quintuples Tracy if there exists something such that that it stems or does not quintuple Mayenne or both is not correct is correct. sent12: the plankton is not a formaldehyde if the spermatophyte is not iridaceous and/or it does not scour Boehmenism. sent13: the plankton is not a mung. sent14: if something does not quintuple bottomland the fact that it is appellate and it is not a kind of a polymastigote is not right. sent15: if the SLS quintuples Tracy then it is a kind of an antibiotic. sent16: if the fact that either the spermatophyte is not a primitivism or it is not iridaceous or both is wrong then the spicule does not silence radian. sent17: if that something is not a primitivism and it does not silence radian is wrong it is appellate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the spermatophyte is not iridaceous and/or it does not scour Boehmenism hold.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the plankton is not a formaldehyde.; sent5 -> int2: the plankton is a formaldehyde.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the spermatophyte is not iridaceous and/or it does not scour Boehmenism is not right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the spicule does not quintuple bottomland.; sent14 -> int6: the fact that the spicule is appellate and is not a polymastigote is false if it does not quintuple bottomland.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the spicule is appellate but it is not a kind of a polymastigote is not right.; sent10 -> int8: if that the spicule is appellate but it is not a kind of a polymastigote is false then it is not a primitivism.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the spicule is not a primitivism.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the spermatophyte is not inappropriate.
sent17 -> int10: if that the SLS is not a kind of a primitivism and does not silence radian is not right then it is appellate.; sent6 & sent11 -> int11: the SLS does quintuple Tracy.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the SLS is an antibiotic is right.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the SLS is not a primitivism and does not silence radian does not hold.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the SLS is appellate.; sent8 & int14 -> int15: that the spicule is not a formaldehyde but a polymastigote does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is not a primitivism does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the SLS is not a primitivism and does not silence radian does not hold if it is an antibiotic. sent2: the spicule does not quintuple bottomland if that the spermatophyte is not iridaceous or it does not scour Boehmenism or both does not hold. sent3: the plankton is not a formaldehyde if the spermatophyte does not scour Boehmenism. sent4: that the plankton is inappropriate and it does quintuple bottomland is not correct if something is a formaldehyde. sent5: the plankton is a formaldehyde and it does silence radian. sent6: there is something such that that it stems and/or it does not quintuple Mayenne does not hold. sent7: the spermatophyte is not non-appellate. sent8: if the SLS is appellate then that the spicule is not a formaldehyde but it is a polymastigote does not hold. sent9: the spermatophyte scours Boehmenism. sent10: if the fact that something is appellate and is not a polymastigote is not right it is not a primitivism. sent11: that the SLS quintuples Tracy if there exists something such that that it stems or does not quintuple Mayenne or both is not correct is correct. sent12: the plankton is not a formaldehyde if the spermatophyte is not iridaceous and/or it does not scour Boehmenism. sent13: the plankton is not a mung. sent14: if something does not quintuple bottomland the fact that it is appellate and it is not a kind of a polymastigote is not right. sent15: if the SLS quintuples Tracy then it is a kind of an antibiotic. sent16: if the fact that either the spermatophyte is not a primitivism or it is not iridaceous or both is wrong then the spicule does not silence radian. sent17: if that something is not a primitivism and it does not silence radian is wrong it is appellate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the spermatophyte is not iridaceous and/or it does not scour Boehmenism hold.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the plankton is not a formaldehyde.; sent5 -> int2: the plankton is a formaldehyde.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the spermatophyte is not iridaceous and/or it does not scour Boehmenism is not right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the spicule does not quintuple bottomland.; sent14 -> int6: the fact that the spicule is appellate and is not a polymastigote is false if it does not quintuple bottomland.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the spicule is appellate but it is not a kind of a polymastigote is not right.; sent10 -> int8: if that the spicule is appellate but it is not a kind of a polymastigote is false then it is not a primitivism.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the spicule is not a primitivism.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__