the stableman fudges xylophonist.
sent1: the transduction is a demineralization. sent2: the stableman does not fudge xylophonist if the fact that the Aleut does not fudge xylophonist and is not a worktable is not right. sent3: there is something such that that it is a electroscope and it is not a goblet is not right. sent4: the fact that the transduction is atomic and is not a bowling does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of atomic thing that does not fudge xylophonist is not true. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both atomic and not a bowling does not hold the stableman does fudge xylophonist. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is atomic and does bowl is not true. sent8: something is not bilabial and it does not feud if the fact that it is not Lincolnesque is not wrong. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is a bowling and it is not atomic is not right then the transduction fudges xylophonist. sent10: everything is not Lincolnesque. sent11: if something is not atomic that the stableman does fudge xylophonist is not wrong. sent12: the fact that the Aleut does not fudge xylophonist and is not a worktable does not hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a worktable. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a bowling and does not fudge xylophonist is not right then the stableman is atomic. sent14: if something is not a worktable the fact that it fudges xylophonist and is not a doorbell does not hold. sent15: the fact that the transduction does fudge xylophonist but it is not a porterhouse is not true. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is atomic thing that does not bowl hold.
sent4 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is atomic thing that does not bowl is incorrect.; int1 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the stableman does not fudge xylophonist.
sent8 -> int2: the cove is not a bilabial and it does not feud if it is not Lincolnesque.; sent10 -> int3: the cove is not Lincolnesque.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cove is not a kind of a bilabial and it is not a feud.; int4 -> int5: everything is not a bilabial and is not a feud.; int5 -> int6: the dimmer is not bilabial and it is not a feud.; int6 -> int7: the dimmer is not a bilabial.;
$hypothesis$ = the stableman fudges xylophonist. ; $context$ = sent1: the transduction is a demineralization. sent2: the stableman does not fudge xylophonist if the fact that the Aleut does not fudge xylophonist and is not a worktable is not right. sent3: there is something such that that it is a electroscope and it is not a goblet is not right. sent4: the fact that the transduction is atomic and is not a bowling does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of atomic thing that does not fudge xylophonist is not true. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both atomic and not a bowling does not hold the stableman does fudge xylophonist. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is atomic and does bowl is not true. sent8: something is not bilabial and it does not feud if the fact that it is not Lincolnesque is not wrong. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is a bowling and it is not atomic is not right then the transduction fudges xylophonist. sent10: everything is not Lincolnesque. sent11: if something is not atomic that the stableman does fudge xylophonist is not wrong. sent12: the fact that the Aleut does not fudge xylophonist and is not a worktable does not hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a worktable. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a bowling and does not fudge xylophonist is not right then the stableman is atomic. sent14: if something is not a worktable the fact that it fudges xylophonist and is not a doorbell does not hold. sent15: the fact that the transduction does fudge xylophonist but it is not a porterhouse is not true. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is atomic thing that does not bowl hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is atomic thing that does not bowl is incorrect.; int1 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__