the paynim is laryngopharyngeal.
sent1: the paynim is not non-laryngopharyngeal if the fact that the fact that the wallaby is not ornithological and not phosphorous is not right is not wrong. sent2: the carburetor is not effortless. sent3: that the hayloft minces and it is a kind of a fingerpaint does not hold if the carburetor is not effortless. sent4: the wallaby is not genic if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a mince and it is a fingerpaint does not hold. sent5: that something is both not ornithological and not phosphorous is not right if it is non-genic.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the hayloft is a mince and it is a kind of a fingerpaint is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a mince and a fingerpaint is not right.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the wallaby is not genic.; sent5 -> int4: if the wallaby is not genic that it is both not ornithological and not phosphorous is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the wallaby is both not ornithological and not phosphorous does not hold.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the paynim is laryngopharyngeal. ; $context$ = sent1: the paynim is not non-laryngopharyngeal if the fact that the fact that the wallaby is not ornithological and not phosphorous is not right is not wrong. sent2: the carburetor is not effortless. sent3: that the hayloft minces and it is a kind of a fingerpaint does not hold if the carburetor is not effortless. sent4: the wallaby is not genic if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a mince and it is a fingerpaint does not hold. sent5: that something is both not ornithological and not phosphorous is not right if it is non-genic. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the hayloft is a mince and it is a kind of a fingerpaint is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a mince and a fingerpaint is not right.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the wallaby is not genic.; sent5 -> int4: if the wallaby is not genic that it is both not ornithological and not phosphorous is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the wallaby is both not ornithological and not phosphorous does not hold.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__