the ham is a purr.
sent1: the euglena bestirs blare if there exists something such that the fact that it liquefies settling and it does not bestirs blare is not true. sent2: the indomethacin is not a roar if it is not basal. sent3: the fact that the ham is a intercostal hold. sent4: the village purrs. sent5: if the ham does not bestir blare it is a purr. sent6: if the ham is carbonaceous that it does liquefy reduplication and is not totipotent is not correct. sent7: if that something does liquefy reduplication and is not totipotent does not hold it does not bestir blare. sent8: the ham does consort. sent9: if something is a stepladder then the fact that it does liquefy settling and it does not bestir blare is not right. sent10: the geographer bestirs blare. sent11: if the iguanodon does not bestir blare then it is not non-sedimentary. sent12: if the ham slaves lycanthropy then the fact that it liquefies settling and is not a boomer is false.
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the ham liquefies reduplication but it is not totipotent is wrong then it does not bestir blare.;
the ham is not a purr.
sent9 -> int2: if the caregiver is a stepladder then the fact that it liquefies settling and does not bestir blare is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the ham is a purr. ; $context$ = sent1: the euglena bestirs blare if there exists something such that the fact that it liquefies settling and it does not bestirs blare is not true. sent2: the indomethacin is not a roar if it is not basal. sent3: the fact that the ham is a intercostal hold. sent4: the village purrs. sent5: if the ham does not bestir blare it is a purr. sent6: if the ham is carbonaceous that it does liquefy reduplication and is not totipotent is not correct. sent7: if that something does liquefy reduplication and is not totipotent does not hold it does not bestir blare. sent8: the ham does consort. sent9: if something is a stepladder then the fact that it does liquefy settling and it does not bestir blare is not right. sent10: the geographer bestirs blare. sent11: if the iguanodon does not bestir blare then it is not non-sedimentary. sent12: if the ham slaves lycanthropy then the fact that it liquefies settling and is not a boomer is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the ham liquefies reduplication but it is not totipotent is wrong then it does not bestir blare.; __UNKNOWN__