that the lender is a kind of democratic thing that dreams is incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that the fact that the lender is not horticultural is correct does not hold then it is a wage. sent2: there is something such that that it asks creativity and it is not inertial does not hold. sent3: either something is a kind of a dreamed or it is a wage or both if it is not a kind of a Tylenchus. sent4: the fact that the Goth is undemocratic is not incorrect. sent5: the lender is testaceous. sent6: that if there is something such that the fact that it asks creativity and is not inertial is false then the foram is inertial is not wrong. sent7: if the lender is testaceous then the fact that it is not a wage is not incorrect. sent8: that the Goth is a kind of testaceous thing that is not cismontane is incorrect if the foram is inertial. sent9: the fact that that the lender is undemocratic and is a dreamed does not hold hold. sent10: that the fact that the lender is not undemocratic is not incorrect if the Goth is not horticultural but it is undemocratic is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lender is horticultural.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the lender is a wage.; sent7 & sent5 -> int2: the lender is not a wage.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lender is not horticultural.;
the lender is democratic a dreamed.
sent2 & sent6 -> int5: the foram is not non-inertial.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that the Goth is testaceous thing that is not cismontane does not hold.; sent3 -> int7: if the trailer is not a Tylenchus then it is a dreamed and/or a wage.;
$hypothesis$ = that the lender is a kind of democratic thing that dreams is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the fact that the lender is not horticultural is correct does not hold then it is a wage. sent2: there is something such that that it asks creativity and it is not inertial does not hold. sent3: either something is a kind of a dreamed or it is a wage or both if it is not a kind of a Tylenchus. sent4: the fact that the Goth is undemocratic is not incorrect. sent5: the lender is testaceous. sent6: that if there is something such that the fact that it asks creativity and is not inertial is false then the foram is inertial is not wrong. sent7: if the lender is testaceous then the fact that it is not a wage is not incorrect. sent8: that the Goth is a kind of testaceous thing that is not cismontane is incorrect if the foram is inertial. sent9: the fact that that the lender is undemocratic and is a dreamed does not hold hold. sent10: that the fact that the lender is not undemocratic is not incorrect if the Goth is not horticultural but it is undemocratic is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lender is horticultural.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the lender is a wage.; sent7 & sent5 -> int2: the lender is not a wage.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lender is not horticultural.; __UNKNOWN__