the undeniableness does not occur.
sent1: the researching does not occur. sent2: that the subsiding terbium happens is correct. sent3: if the narrowingness does not occur then the research happens but the subsiding terbium does not occur. sent4: that the confection does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: if that the subsiding terbium does not occur hold the fact that the immunochemicalness does not occur and the drawing does not occur is not correct. sent6: that the researching does not occur leads to that both the subsiding terbium and the idealizing opacity happens. sent7: the fact that the subsiding terbium happens is right if the research does not occur. sent8: that the antecedentness happens causes that the idealizing Southey occurs. sent9: if the immunochemicalness and the drawing happens that the idealizing Southey does not occur is right. sent10: that not the training but the episcopalness happens is wrong if the pentavalentness does not occur. sent11: the drawing does not occur. sent12: if the subsiding albatross occurs the non-narrowingness and the marching occurs. sent13: that the undeniableness does not occur is triggered by that the non-antecedentness and the idealizing opacity happens. sent14: both the subsiding albatross and the moneranness occurs if the episcopalness does not occur. sent15: the idealizing Southey does not occur and the antecedent does not occur if the idealizing opacity does not occur. sent16: the catkinateness is brought about by that the idealizing Southey does not occur and the idealizing opacity happens. sent17: the immunochemicalness occurs but the drawing does not occur. sent18: if that the training does not occur but the episcopalness occurs does not hold that the episcopalness does not occur is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antecedent happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the idealizing Southey happens.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: the subsiding terbium happens and the idealizing opacity happens.; int2 -> int3: the idealizing opacity occurs.;
the catkinateness and the Frenchifying occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the undeniableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the researching does not occur. sent2: that the subsiding terbium happens is correct. sent3: if the narrowingness does not occur then the research happens but the subsiding terbium does not occur. sent4: that the confection does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: if that the subsiding terbium does not occur hold the fact that the immunochemicalness does not occur and the drawing does not occur is not correct. sent6: that the researching does not occur leads to that both the subsiding terbium and the idealizing opacity happens. sent7: the fact that the subsiding terbium happens is right if the research does not occur. sent8: that the antecedentness happens causes that the idealizing Southey occurs. sent9: if the immunochemicalness and the drawing happens that the idealizing Southey does not occur is right. sent10: that not the training but the episcopalness happens is wrong if the pentavalentness does not occur. sent11: the drawing does not occur. sent12: if the subsiding albatross occurs the non-narrowingness and the marching occurs. sent13: that the undeniableness does not occur is triggered by that the non-antecedentness and the idealizing opacity happens. sent14: both the subsiding albatross and the moneranness occurs if the episcopalness does not occur. sent15: the idealizing Southey does not occur and the antecedent does not occur if the idealizing opacity does not occur. sent16: the catkinateness is brought about by that the idealizing Southey does not occur and the idealizing opacity happens. sent17: the immunochemicalness occurs but the drawing does not occur. sent18: if that the training does not occur but the episcopalness occurs does not hold that the episcopalness does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antecedent happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the idealizing Southey happens.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: the subsiding terbium happens and the idealizing opacity happens.; int2 -> int3: the idealizing opacity occurs.; __UNKNOWN__