the signor is a pteropogon.
sent1: the metropolitan does comfort propagator if that the fact that the attendant is a crib that does not comfort propagator is not incorrect does not hold. sent2: if the fact that something is a anopheline that is not necessary is not true then the fact that it is not a pteropogon is not incorrect. sent3: that if the mosaic is the purchase the mosaic is an orthodontist is correct. sent4: if the paraldehyde is not taxonomic then the fact that it is not non-aesthetics and does draw archaist is wrong. sent5: the paraldehyde is not taxonomic. sent6: the amorphophallus is an orthodontist. sent7: the mosaic reflectorizes tailed. sent8: the mosaic comforts Handel if it is an orthodontist. sent9: the fact that the mosaic is binoculars and it is a purchase is false. sent10: if something that comforts Handel does reflectorize tailed it is not a caldron. sent11: that something is a crib that does not comfort propagator does not hold if it does not publicize. sent12: The tailed reflectorizes mosaic. sent13: if the mosaic does reflectorize tailed that it is binoculars but not a purchase is not correct. sent14: the fact that if the mosaic does reflectorize tailed then the fact that the mosaic is binoculars and it is a kind of a purchase is not correct is not wrong. sent15: the mosaic does comfort Handel and it reflectorizes tailed if the metropolitan is not a pteropogon. sent16: the mosaic is an orthodontist if the fact that it is binoculars and it is not a purchase is not right. sent17: the signor is not a kind of a pteropogon if the mosaic does comfort Handel. sent18: if something does comfort propagator the fact that it is anopheline thing that is not necessary is not right. sent19: if something is not a caldron then that the signor is a kind of a caldron that is not an orthodontist is not right.
sent13 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the mosaic is binoculars but it is not a purchase is not correct.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the mosaic is a kind of an orthodontist.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the mosaic comforts Handel.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
that the signor is a caldron that is not an orthodontist is false.
sent10 -> int4: the mosaic is not a caldron if it does comfort Handel and it does reflectorize tailed.; sent2 -> int5: the metropolitan is not a kind of a pteropogon if the fact that it is a kind of anopheline thing that is not necessary is not correct.; sent18 -> int6: if the metropolitan does comfort propagator that it is a kind of a anopheline and is not necessary is not right.; sent11 -> int7: that the fact that the attendant is a crib that does not comfort propagator is correct is not correct if it does not publicize.; sent4 & sent5 -> int8: the fact that the paraldehyde is a kind of an aesthetics and does draw archaist is incorrect.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of aesthetics thing that draws archaist is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the signor is a pteropogon. ; $context$ = sent1: the metropolitan does comfort propagator if that the fact that the attendant is a crib that does not comfort propagator is not incorrect does not hold. sent2: if the fact that something is a anopheline that is not necessary is not true then the fact that it is not a pteropogon is not incorrect. sent3: that if the mosaic is the purchase the mosaic is an orthodontist is correct. sent4: if the paraldehyde is not taxonomic then the fact that it is not non-aesthetics and does draw archaist is wrong. sent5: the paraldehyde is not taxonomic. sent6: the amorphophallus is an orthodontist. sent7: the mosaic reflectorizes tailed. sent8: the mosaic comforts Handel if it is an orthodontist. sent9: the fact that the mosaic is binoculars and it is a purchase is false. sent10: if something that comforts Handel does reflectorize tailed it is not a caldron. sent11: that something is a crib that does not comfort propagator does not hold if it does not publicize. sent12: The tailed reflectorizes mosaic. sent13: if the mosaic does reflectorize tailed that it is binoculars but not a purchase is not correct. sent14: the fact that if the mosaic does reflectorize tailed then the fact that the mosaic is binoculars and it is a kind of a purchase is not correct is not wrong. sent15: the mosaic does comfort Handel and it reflectorizes tailed if the metropolitan is not a pteropogon. sent16: the mosaic is an orthodontist if the fact that it is binoculars and it is not a purchase is not right. sent17: the signor is not a kind of a pteropogon if the mosaic does comfort Handel. sent18: if something does comfort propagator the fact that it is anopheline thing that is not necessary is not right. sent19: if something is not a caldron then that the signor is a kind of a caldron that is not an orthodontist is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the mosaic is binoculars but it is not a purchase is not correct.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the mosaic is a kind of an orthodontist.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the mosaic comforts Handel.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__