that there exists something such that if it is ontological the fact that it is non-ontogenetic but not a rake does not hold is false.
sent1: that the suiting is not ontogenetic but it is a rake is not right if it is ontological. sent2: there exists something such that if it is ontological then it is not ontogenetic and is not a rake. sent3: the fact that the suiting is not ontogenetic and does not rake does not hold if that it is ontological is not incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it is ontological that it is ontogenetic and it does not rake is wrong. sent5: if the perpetrator stigmatizes sucrose that it is not an uplifted and it is not an assimilation is wrong. sent6: that the dik-dik does not result and it does not stigmatize sucrose is not true if it does sing. sent7: if the suiting is ontological then that it is ontogenetic and is not a rake is not right. sent8: if the suiting is ontological that it is not ontogenetic and it is not a rake is not wrong. sent9: if something is a kind of a wicket-keeper that it does not perplex milord and is not a wiper does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it perplexes nucleoside the fact that it is not a subtrahend and not finer is not true. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is mutagenic is not false that it is non-flowery thing that does not tsk is not true. sent12: if the suiting perplexes Hubbard then the fact that it is not a wiper and is not a traitress is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if it is ontological then that it is a kind of non-ontogenetic a rake does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is ethnological the fact that it is not a kind of a polygynist and it is not self is not correct.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is a wicket-keeper that it does not perplex milord and is not a wiper does not hold.
sent9 -> int1: if the nucleoside is a wicket-keeper then the fact that it does not perplex milord and it is not a wiper does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is ontological the fact that it is non-ontogenetic but not a rake does not hold is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the suiting is not ontogenetic but it is a rake is not right if it is ontological. sent2: there exists something such that if it is ontological then it is not ontogenetic and is not a rake. sent3: the fact that the suiting is not ontogenetic and does not rake does not hold if that it is ontological is not incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it is ontological that it is ontogenetic and it does not rake is wrong. sent5: if the perpetrator stigmatizes sucrose that it is not an uplifted and it is not an assimilation is wrong. sent6: that the dik-dik does not result and it does not stigmatize sucrose is not true if it does sing. sent7: if the suiting is ontological then that it is ontogenetic and is not a rake is not right. sent8: if the suiting is ontological that it is not ontogenetic and it is not a rake is not wrong. sent9: if something is a kind of a wicket-keeper that it does not perplex milord and is not a wiper does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it perplexes nucleoside the fact that it is not a subtrahend and not finer is not true. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is mutagenic is not false that it is non-flowery thing that does not tsk is not true. sent12: if the suiting perplexes Hubbard then the fact that it is not a wiper and is not a traitress is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if it is ontological then that it is a kind of non-ontogenetic a rake does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is ethnological the fact that it is not a kind of a polygynist and it is not self is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__