that the overlook is not a rancidity or does not sew or both is not correct.
sent1: something is not a kind of a rancidity and/or it does sew if it does not resubmit generalization. sent2: That the cleaners does not resubmit transmitter hold. sent3: the transmitter resubmits cleaners if it is both not a Lawrence and intolerant. sent4: if the transmitter dehydrogenates transmitter and is a kind of a anticonvulsant the overlook does not resubmit generalization. sent5: something is a anticonvulsant if it is a pomp. sent6: either the transmitter does not resubmit generalization or it does not dehydrogenate transmitter or both. sent7: if something does not dehydrogenate transmitter and does resubmit cleaners the fact that it is not nonjudgmental is correct. sent8: if the overlook does not dehydrogenate transmitter then the fact that it either is not a rancidity or does not sew or both is incorrect. sent9: that the transmitter does not resubmit cleaners hold. sent10: something that does not resubmit generalization is not a rancidity and/or does not sew. sent11: the fact that the transmitter does dehydrogenate transmitter hold if the fact that it is not a Lawrence and it is intolerant does not hold. sent12: everything is a pomp and it does fund.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transmitter is not a Lawrence but it is intolerant.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the transmitter resubmits cleaners is correct.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the transmitter is both not a Lawrence and intolerant is not right.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: that the transmitter dehydrogenates transmitter is not wrong.; sent5 -> int5: if the transmitter is a pomp then it is a kind of a anticonvulsant.; sent12 -> int6: the transmitter is a pomp and funds.; int6 -> int7: the transmitter is a pomp.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the transmitter is a anticonvulsant.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the transmitter does dehydrogenate transmitter and it is a kind of a anticonvulsant.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the overlook does not resubmit generalization.; sent10 -> int11: either the overlook is not a rancidity or it does not sew or both if that it does not resubmit generalization is not wrong.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the overlook is not a anticonvulsant or it is not nonjudgmental or both.
sent7 -> int12: if the overlook does not dehydrogenate transmitter and does resubmit cleaners then it is not nonjudgmental.;
$hypothesis$ = that the overlook is not a rancidity or does not sew or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a rancidity and/or it does sew if it does not resubmit generalization. sent2: That the cleaners does not resubmit transmitter hold. sent3: the transmitter resubmits cleaners if it is both not a Lawrence and intolerant. sent4: if the transmitter dehydrogenates transmitter and is a kind of a anticonvulsant the overlook does not resubmit generalization. sent5: something is a anticonvulsant if it is a pomp. sent6: either the transmitter does not resubmit generalization or it does not dehydrogenate transmitter or both. sent7: if something does not dehydrogenate transmitter and does resubmit cleaners the fact that it is not nonjudgmental is correct. sent8: if the overlook does not dehydrogenate transmitter then the fact that it either is not a rancidity or does not sew or both is incorrect. sent9: that the transmitter does not resubmit cleaners hold. sent10: something that does not resubmit generalization is not a rancidity and/or does not sew. sent11: the fact that the transmitter does dehydrogenate transmitter hold if the fact that it is not a Lawrence and it is intolerant does not hold. sent12: everything is a pomp and it does fund. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transmitter is not a Lawrence but it is intolerant.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the transmitter resubmits cleaners is correct.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the transmitter is both not a Lawrence and intolerant is not right.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: that the transmitter dehydrogenates transmitter is not wrong.; sent5 -> int5: if the transmitter is a pomp then it is a kind of a anticonvulsant.; sent12 -> int6: the transmitter is a pomp and funds.; int6 -> int7: the transmitter is a pomp.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the transmitter is a anticonvulsant.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the transmitter does dehydrogenate transmitter and it is a kind of a anticonvulsant.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the overlook does not resubmit generalization.; sent10 -> int11: either the overlook is not a rancidity or it does not sew or both if that it does not resubmit generalization is not wrong.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__