that there exists something such that it marks network and is a Job is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the opsonization does not preoccupy vantage but it is a kind of a Job is false. sent2: the fact that the cheek is a pileup is right. sent3: the burr is Incan if the cheek is a kind of a pileup. sent4: that the opsonization does not preoccupy vantage and is not a kind of a Job is not true. sent5: the burr is a Job if there is something such that the fact that it does not preoccupy vantage and it is not a Job is not correct. sent6: something does mark network if it is Incan.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the burr is Incan.; sent6 -> int2: the burr marks network if it is Incan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the burr marks network.; sent4 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not preoccupy vantage and is not a Job is incorrect.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the burr is a Job.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the burr marks network and is a Job.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that it marks network and is a Job is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the opsonization does not preoccupy vantage but it is a kind of a Job is false. sent2: the fact that the cheek is a pileup is right. sent3: the burr is Incan if the cheek is a kind of a pileup. sent4: that the opsonization does not preoccupy vantage and is not a kind of a Job is not true. sent5: the burr is a Job if there is something such that the fact that it does not preoccupy vantage and it is not a Job is not correct. sent6: something does mark network if it is Incan. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the burr is Incan.; sent6 -> int2: the burr marks network if it is Incan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the burr marks network.; sent4 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not preoccupy vantage and is not a Job is incorrect.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the burr is a Job.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the burr marks network and is a Job.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__