there exists something such that the fact that it is not opened and it is a kind of an acquirer is wrong.
sent1: something that is not a kind of a sled is not a titanium or is nondisposable or both. sent2: something is not a rhombus if that it is not anisogametic and/or it is not an apostrophe is false. sent3: if the shrew does sled then it is hydrometric. sent4: if that the shrew does damascene is not incorrect then it is exteroceptive. sent5: the fact that something is both not an opened and not an acquirer does not hold if it is exteroceptive. sent6: the veneering is a kind of a last. sent7: the flood is not a sled. sent8: that the homosexuality does not sled but it is a kind of an acquirer is not right. sent9: that the entrecote does not last hold if the veneering is not a hulking and/or is a sled. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is opened thing that does not sled does not hold. sent11: something does not denaturalize popgun and is not non-sociolinguistic. sent12: there exists something such that that it severs and it is not a kind of a conflagration does not hold. sent13: the homosexuality does not last if the entrecote is non-opened and/or it is an acquirer. sent14: there exists something such that that it is both hydrometric and not a titanium is wrong. sent15: something does damascene and it is a wally if it is not a rhombus. sent16: that that the entrecote is a kind of a hulking and it is a last does not hold is true. sent17: there exists nothing such that it either is not anisogametic or is not an apostrophe or both. sent18: if the shrew is not a sled then the veneering is not a hulking or sled or both. sent19: if there exists something such that either it is not hydrometric or it is not a hulking or both then the veneering is not a kind of a sled. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is hydrometric but not a titanium is not true the shrew is not hydrometric. sent21: something is not opened but it is a sled. sent22: if something is not a last either it is not hydrometric or it is not a kind of a hulking or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shrew is a sled.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the shrew is hydrometric.; sent14 & sent20 -> int2: the shrew is not hydrometric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shrew is not a kind of a sled.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the veneering is not a hulking and/or is a sled.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the entrecote is not a kind of a last is true.;
the veneering is not a titanium or is nondisposable or both.
sent1 -> int7: the veneering is not a kind of a titanium and/or it is nondisposable if it is not a sled.; sent22 -> int8: if the shrew is not a kind of a last it is not hydrometric and/or it is not a hulking.; sent5 -> int9: if the shrew is exteroceptive then that it is both not opened and not an acquirer is false.; sent2 -> int10: the popgun is not a rhombus if that it either is not anisogametic or is not an apostrophe or both is false.; sent17 -> int11: the fact that the popgun is not anisogametic and/or it is not an apostrophe is not right.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the popgun is not a rhombus hold.; int12 -> int13: everything is not a kind of a rhombus.; int13 -> int14: the homosexuality is not a rhombus.; sent15 -> int15: the homosexuality is a damascene and is a wally if it is not a kind of a rhombus.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the homosexuality is a kind of a damascene and it is a kind of a wally.; int16 -> int17: everything is damascene and it is a wally.; int17 -> int18: the entrecote is damascene thing that is a kind of a wally.; int18 -> int19: that the entrecote is damascene is true.; int19 -> int20: everything damascenes.; int20 -> int21: the shrew is damascene.; sent4 & int21 -> int22: the fact that the shrew is exteroceptive is not incorrect.; int9 & int22 -> int23: that the shrew is not an opened and not an acquirer does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is not opened and it is a kind of an acquirer is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a kind of a sled is not a titanium or is nondisposable or both. sent2: something is not a rhombus if that it is not anisogametic and/or it is not an apostrophe is false. sent3: if the shrew does sled then it is hydrometric. sent4: if that the shrew does damascene is not incorrect then it is exteroceptive. sent5: the fact that something is both not an opened and not an acquirer does not hold if it is exteroceptive. sent6: the veneering is a kind of a last. sent7: the flood is not a sled. sent8: that the homosexuality does not sled but it is a kind of an acquirer is not right. sent9: that the entrecote does not last hold if the veneering is not a hulking and/or is a sled. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is opened thing that does not sled does not hold. sent11: something does not denaturalize popgun and is not non-sociolinguistic. sent12: there exists something such that that it severs and it is not a kind of a conflagration does not hold. sent13: the homosexuality does not last if the entrecote is non-opened and/or it is an acquirer. sent14: there exists something such that that it is both hydrometric and not a titanium is wrong. sent15: something does damascene and it is a wally if it is not a rhombus. sent16: that that the entrecote is a kind of a hulking and it is a last does not hold is true. sent17: there exists nothing such that it either is not anisogametic or is not an apostrophe or both. sent18: if the shrew is not a sled then the veneering is not a hulking or sled or both. sent19: if there exists something such that either it is not hydrometric or it is not a hulking or both then the veneering is not a kind of a sled. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is hydrometric but not a titanium is not true the shrew is not hydrometric. sent21: something is not opened but it is a sled. sent22: if something is not a last either it is not hydrometric or it is not a kind of a hulking or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shrew is a sled.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the shrew is hydrometric.; sent14 & sent20 -> int2: the shrew is not hydrometric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the shrew is not a kind of a sled.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the veneering is not a hulking and/or is a sled.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the entrecote is not a kind of a last is true.; __UNKNOWN__