the perfecting leads to that the aggregating palanquin does not occur or that the keratotomy does not occur or both.
sent1: if the Burundiness does not occur then the fact that the fact that both the perfecting and the aggregating palanquin happens is incorrect is not false. sent2: the keratotomy and/or the augiticness occurs if the services does not occur. sent3: the presidentialness and/or the lockstep is brought about by that the perfecting does not occur. sent4: if the dissilience occurs the moving bise occurs. sent5: that the lockstep and the perfecting happens leads to that the keratotomy does not occur. sent6: the hematologicness occurs and/or the subclinicalness does not occur. sent7: that the postprandialness occurs is not wrong if the keratotomy occurs. sent8: the fact that the presidentialness happens is true. sent9: if the espousing does not occur then the moving blender and the subclinicalness occurs. sent10: the lockstep occurs and the presidentialness happens. sent11: the aggregating palanquin does not occur and/or the keratotomy happens if the perfecting happens. sent12: the espousing does not occur. sent13: if the moving blender occurs then the hypophysectomy does not occur and the dissilience happens. sent14: the servicing does not occur if the fact that the servicing occurs but the extension does not occur is not right. sent15: the dissociating viverrine happens. sent16: if the fact that the moving bise happens hold that the services but not the extension occurs is wrong. sent17: either the igniting does not occur or the quotation happens or both. sent18: the augiticness causes the postprandialness. sent19: the control happens and/or the yelling reflectiveness does not occur. sent20: the perfectness does not occur if that the perfectness occurs and the aggregating palanquin happens is not correct. sent21: either the overture happens or the moving iceman does not occur or both if the implosion happens.
sent10 -> int1: the lockstep occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perfectness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the lockstep and the perfectness occurs.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the keratotomy does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the aggregating palanquin does not occur and/or the keratotomy does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the postprandialness and the occasion happens.
sent9 & sent12 -> int5: the moving blender and the subclinicalness happens.; int5 -> int6: the moving blender occurs.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the hypophysectomy does not occur and the dissilience happens.; int7 -> int8: the dissilience happens.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the moving bise happens.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the servicing happens and the extension does not occur does not hold.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the servicing does not occur is not incorrect.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: the keratotomy happens or the augiticness occurs or both.; int12 & sent7 & sent18 -> int13: the postprandialness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the perfecting leads to that the aggregating palanquin does not occur or that the keratotomy does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Burundiness does not occur then the fact that the fact that both the perfecting and the aggregating palanquin happens is incorrect is not false. sent2: the keratotomy and/or the augiticness occurs if the services does not occur. sent3: the presidentialness and/or the lockstep is brought about by that the perfecting does not occur. sent4: if the dissilience occurs the moving bise occurs. sent5: that the lockstep and the perfecting happens leads to that the keratotomy does not occur. sent6: the hematologicness occurs and/or the subclinicalness does not occur. sent7: that the postprandialness occurs is not wrong if the keratotomy occurs. sent8: the fact that the presidentialness happens is true. sent9: if the espousing does not occur then the moving blender and the subclinicalness occurs. sent10: the lockstep occurs and the presidentialness happens. sent11: the aggregating palanquin does not occur and/or the keratotomy happens if the perfecting happens. sent12: the espousing does not occur. sent13: if the moving blender occurs then the hypophysectomy does not occur and the dissilience happens. sent14: the servicing does not occur if the fact that the servicing occurs but the extension does not occur is not right. sent15: the dissociating viverrine happens. sent16: if the fact that the moving bise happens hold that the services but not the extension occurs is wrong. sent17: either the igniting does not occur or the quotation happens or both. sent18: the augiticness causes the postprandialness. sent19: the control happens and/or the yelling reflectiveness does not occur. sent20: the perfectness does not occur if that the perfectness occurs and the aggregating palanquin happens is not correct. sent21: either the overture happens or the moving iceman does not occur or both if the implosion happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the lockstep occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perfectness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the lockstep and the perfectness occurs.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the keratotomy does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the aggregating palanquin does not occur and/or the keratotomy does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__