that the azidoness does not occur and the stomatalness happens is incorrect if the hammer does not occur.
sent1: that the infinitivalness does not occur triggers that both the non-stomatalness and the flexibleness happens. sent2: the azidoness does not occur but the stomatalness happens. sent3: that both the streak and the azidoness occurs is triggered by the non-stomatalness. sent4: that not the hammer but the uploading sherbert occurs is not right. sent5: the brahminicness does not occur if the hammer occurs. sent6: if the uploading sherbert does not occur the fact that the isomorphousness and the non-calmness occurs does not hold. sent7: that that the azidoness does not occur and the stomatalness occurs is false if the streaking does not occur is correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hammering does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uploading sherbert occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: not the hammer but the uploading sherbert happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the uploading sherbert does not occur.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the isomorphousness but not the calm happens does not hold.;
the brahminicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the azidoness does not occur and the stomatalness happens is incorrect if the hammer does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the infinitivalness does not occur triggers that both the non-stomatalness and the flexibleness happens. sent2: the azidoness does not occur but the stomatalness happens. sent3: that both the streak and the azidoness occurs is triggered by the non-stomatalness. sent4: that not the hammer but the uploading sherbert occurs is not right. sent5: the brahminicness does not occur if the hammer occurs. sent6: if the uploading sherbert does not occur the fact that the isomorphousness and the non-calmness occurs does not hold. sent7: that that the azidoness does not occur and the stomatalness occurs is false if the streaking does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hammering does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uploading sherbert occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: not the hammer but the uploading sherbert happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the uploading sherbert does not occur.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the isomorphousness but not the calm happens does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__