that the drupe is not a isostasy hold.
sent1: if something rationalizes breadroot it is not a Cakchiquel and/or it is a isostasy. sent2: the fact that something is both not thermostatic and a Halley does not hold if the fact that it is professional is not false. sent3: the Palatinate does lime Pseudoryx and is thermostatic if it is not a kind of a Cakchiquel. sent4: if that the drupe is not thermostatic is correct then it is not a isostasy. sent5: that the Palatinate is not a Mergus but it rationalizes adobo is not correct. sent6: if that the drupe limes Pseudoryx and does rationalize adobo is wrong then it is not a kind of a Mergus. sent7: if the Palatinate does not lime Pseudoryx then the purchase is not unprofessional. sent8: if the tarsal is a farmer but it does not rationalize breadroot then that the drupe does rationalize breadroot is right. sent9: if that the Palatinate is not a Mergus and rationalizes adobo is wrong the drupe does not lime Pseudoryx. sent10: something is not a isostasy if it is not thermostatic. sent11: that something is unprofessional and it is thermostatic is false if it does not lime Pseudoryx. sent12: the drupe does not lime Pseudoryx if the Palatinate is a Mergus. sent13: that the Palatinate is a Mergus that rationalizes adobo is not correct.
sent9 & sent5 -> int1: the drupe does not lime Pseudoryx.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the drupe is both not professional and thermostatic is not false is not right if it does not lime Pseudoryx.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the drupe is unprofessional and it is thermostatic is false.;
the fact that the purchase is a kind of non-thermostatic thing that is a Halley is false.
sent2 -> int4: if the purchase is not unprofessional then the fact that it is not thermostatic and it is a Halley is not true.; sent1 -> int5: either the drupe is not a Cakchiquel or it is a kind of a isostasy or both if it rationalizes breadroot.;
$hypothesis$ = that the drupe is not a isostasy hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something rationalizes breadroot it is not a Cakchiquel and/or it is a isostasy. sent2: the fact that something is both not thermostatic and a Halley does not hold if the fact that it is professional is not false. sent3: the Palatinate does lime Pseudoryx and is thermostatic if it is not a kind of a Cakchiquel. sent4: if that the drupe is not thermostatic is correct then it is not a isostasy. sent5: that the Palatinate is not a Mergus but it rationalizes adobo is not correct. sent6: if that the drupe limes Pseudoryx and does rationalize adobo is wrong then it is not a kind of a Mergus. sent7: if the Palatinate does not lime Pseudoryx then the purchase is not unprofessional. sent8: if the tarsal is a farmer but it does not rationalize breadroot then that the drupe does rationalize breadroot is right. sent9: if that the Palatinate is not a Mergus and rationalizes adobo is wrong the drupe does not lime Pseudoryx. sent10: something is not a isostasy if it is not thermostatic. sent11: that something is unprofessional and it is thermostatic is false if it does not lime Pseudoryx. sent12: the drupe does not lime Pseudoryx if the Palatinate is a Mergus. sent13: that the Palatinate is a Mergus that rationalizes adobo is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent5 -> int1: the drupe does not lime Pseudoryx.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the drupe is both not professional and thermostatic is not false is not right if it does not lime Pseudoryx.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the drupe is unprofessional and it is thermostatic is false.; __UNKNOWN__