the grind is molecular.
sent1: that the sapphire confines sapphire hold. sent2: if there exists something such that it is an earmark and does not persist snuffers then the fact that the bull does not confine veiled is not false. sent3: the bull is not a kind of a Yemeni if the sapphire is not a Yemeni and it is not a kind of a joint. sent4: if the sapphire is not a Yemeni then the grind is Yemeni. sent5: the grind persists gobbler if that the orthomyxovirus is an earmark but it does not persist snuffers is not right. sent6: if the orthomyxovirus is not a kind of an earmark that the grind persists gobbler is true. sent7: the sapphire is not a graft or it is a Yemeni or both. sent8: something is a kind of an earmark that persists snuffers. sent9: the bull does confine veiled and it does persist bull. sent10: the bull persists bull. sent11: the orthomyxovirus is an earmark. sent12: the sapphire does not graft or it is a Yemeni or both if it confines sapphire. sent13: the bull does not persist bull or it does not persist gobbler or both if it does confine veiled. sent14: if something is not a joint it is not molecular. sent15: there exists something such that it does not persist snuffers. sent16: something does persist gobbler and is not a graft. sent17: the grind is Yemeni if the sapphire is not a graft or Yemeni or both. sent18: there is something such that it is an earmark. sent19: if the partaker is not a kind of a graft but it prioritizes accusative then the lowboy confines sapphire. sent20: if something that is a Yemeni does persist gobbler that it does not joint is correct. sent21: something is not a Yemeni and it does not joint if it persists bull. sent22: That the sapphire confines sapphire hold. sent23: if the sapphire does confine sapphire then it is not a graft and/or is not a kind of a Yemeni. sent24: if something is not Yemeni then it persists gobbler and/or it does confine veiled. sent25: if the lowboy does confine sapphire then the sapphire does persist bull.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orthomyxovirus is an earmark but it does not persist snuffers.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is an earmark and does not persist snuffers is not incorrect.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the bull does not confine veiled.; sent9 -> int3: the bull does confine veiled.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the orthomyxovirus is an earmark that does not persist snuffers is incorrect.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the grind persists gobbler.; sent23 & sent1 -> int7: either the sapphire does not graft or it is not a Yemeni or both.; sent17 & int7 -> int8: the grind is a kind of a Yemeni.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the grind is a kind of a Yemeni and it persists gobbler.; sent20 -> int10: the grind is not a joint if it is a Yemeni and it persists gobbler.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the grind is not a joint.; sent14 -> int12: the grind is not molecular if it is not a joint.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the grind is molecular is not false.
sent24 -> int13: the bull persists gobbler and/or it confines veiled if it is not Yemeni.; sent21 -> int14: if the sapphire persists bull it is non-Yemeni thing that is not a kind of a joint.;
$hypothesis$ = the grind is molecular. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sapphire confines sapphire hold. sent2: if there exists something such that it is an earmark and does not persist snuffers then the fact that the bull does not confine veiled is not false. sent3: the bull is not a kind of a Yemeni if the sapphire is not a Yemeni and it is not a kind of a joint. sent4: if the sapphire is not a Yemeni then the grind is Yemeni. sent5: the grind persists gobbler if that the orthomyxovirus is an earmark but it does not persist snuffers is not right. sent6: if the orthomyxovirus is not a kind of an earmark that the grind persists gobbler is true. sent7: the sapphire is not a graft or it is a Yemeni or both. sent8: something is a kind of an earmark that persists snuffers. sent9: the bull does confine veiled and it does persist bull. sent10: the bull persists bull. sent11: the orthomyxovirus is an earmark. sent12: the sapphire does not graft or it is a Yemeni or both if it confines sapphire. sent13: the bull does not persist bull or it does not persist gobbler or both if it does confine veiled. sent14: if something is not a joint it is not molecular. sent15: there exists something such that it does not persist snuffers. sent16: something does persist gobbler and is not a graft. sent17: the grind is Yemeni if the sapphire is not a graft or Yemeni or both. sent18: there is something such that it is an earmark. sent19: if the partaker is not a kind of a graft but it prioritizes accusative then the lowboy confines sapphire. sent20: if something that is a Yemeni does persist gobbler that it does not joint is correct. sent21: something is not a Yemeni and it does not joint if it persists bull. sent22: That the sapphire confines sapphire hold. sent23: if the sapphire does confine sapphire then it is not a graft and/or is not a kind of a Yemeni. sent24: if something is not Yemeni then it persists gobbler and/or it does confine veiled. sent25: if the lowboy does confine sapphire then the sapphire does persist bull. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orthomyxovirus is an earmark but it does not persist snuffers.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is an earmark and does not persist snuffers is not incorrect.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the bull does not confine veiled.; sent9 -> int3: the bull does confine veiled.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the orthomyxovirus is an earmark that does not persist snuffers is incorrect.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the grind persists gobbler.; sent23 & sent1 -> int7: either the sapphire does not graft or it is not a Yemeni or both.; sent17 & int7 -> int8: the grind is a kind of a Yemeni.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the grind is a kind of a Yemeni and it persists gobbler.; sent20 -> int10: the grind is not a joint if it is a Yemeni and it persists gobbler.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the grind is not a joint.; sent14 -> int12: the grind is not molecular if it is not a joint.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__