the pancreatectomy does not occur.
sent1: if the suborning Rockingham does not occur then that the lobbing stoichiometry does not occur and the reprisal occurs is false. sent2: if that the hiplengthness does not occur is right then the insubordinateness and/or the incommodiousness occurs. sent3: that the suborning Rockingham does not occur but the holdover happens is caused by that the lobbing ingrowth does not occur. sent4: if the subordination happens then both the non-hiplengthness and the banning apocalypse happens. sent5: if the fact that the incommodiousness and the pancreatectomy happens does not hold the pancreatectomy does not occur. sent6: the insubordinateness occurs. sent7: if that the lobbing stoichiometry does not occur and the reprisal happens does not hold then the subordination happens. sent8: if the fact that the hiplengthness does not occur is not false the fact that the incommodiousness happens and the pancreatectomy occurs is not true. sent9: the lobbing ingrowth does not occur and the lobbing definition happens if that the purification does not occur is not wrong. sent10: the insubordinateness happens and the pancreatectomy happens. sent11: if the wariness does not occur then that the banning Potemkin does not occur and the schlep does not occur is wrong. sent12: both the suborning Wolffiella and the insubordinateness happens if the pancreatectomy does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the banning Potemkin does not occur and the schlep does not occur is wrong the purification does not occur.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the pancreatectomy does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the pancreatectomy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the suborning Rockingham does not occur then that the lobbing stoichiometry does not occur and the reprisal occurs is false. sent2: if that the hiplengthness does not occur is right then the insubordinateness and/or the incommodiousness occurs. sent3: that the suborning Rockingham does not occur but the holdover happens is caused by that the lobbing ingrowth does not occur. sent4: if the subordination happens then both the non-hiplengthness and the banning apocalypse happens. sent5: if the fact that the incommodiousness and the pancreatectomy happens does not hold the pancreatectomy does not occur. sent6: the insubordinateness occurs. sent7: if that the lobbing stoichiometry does not occur and the reprisal happens does not hold then the subordination happens. sent8: if the fact that the hiplengthness does not occur is not false the fact that the incommodiousness happens and the pancreatectomy occurs is not true. sent9: the lobbing ingrowth does not occur and the lobbing definition happens if that the purification does not occur is not wrong. sent10: the insubordinateness happens and the pancreatectomy happens. sent11: if the wariness does not occur then that the banning Potemkin does not occur and the schlep does not occur is wrong. sent12: both the suborning Wolffiella and the insubordinateness happens if the pancreatectomy does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the banning Potemkin does not occur and the schlep does not occur is wrong the purification does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__