that there exists something such that the fact that it does labor obverse and is not a toad-in-the-hole is not right is wrong.
sent1: the habergeon is not a peak. sent2: if the habergeon does not peak then that it is not incontestable and it is vice-presidential is incorrect. sent3: if the bric-a-brac does rehabilitate pickings the fact that the habergeon rehabilitate pickings but it is not entomophilous is not correct. sent4: if the obverse does bid then the bric-a-brac does rehabilitate pickings. sent5: the gloxinia does not rehabilitate marasmus. sent6: if something is not vice-presidential then it is not entomophilous. sent7: there exists something such that it labors obverse and it is not a toad-in-the-hole. sent8: if something labors obverse and is not a toad-in-the-hole it is a kind of a bidding. sent9: something does rehabilitate pickings but it is non-entomophilous if it is not vice-presidential. sent10: if the fact that the habergeon is not incontestable but it is vice-presidential is not true it is not vice-presidential.
sent8 -> int1: the obverse bids if it does labor obverse and it is not a toad-in-the-hole.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the obverse does labor obverse and is not a toad-in-the-hole.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the obverse does bid.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the bric-a-brac does rehabilitate pickings.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the habergeon rehabilitates pickings and is not entomophilous does not hold.; sent9 -> int5: the habergeon rehabilitates pickings but it is not entomophilous if it is not vice-presidential.; sent2 & sent1 -> int6: that the habergeon is not incontestable but it is vice-presidential does not hold.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the habergeon is not vice-presidential.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the habergeon does rehabilitate pickings but it is not entomophilous.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the obverse does labor obverse and is not a toad-in-the-hole is not true.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that the fact that it does labor obverse and is not a toad-in-the-hole is not right is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the habergeon is not a peak. sent2: if the habergeon does not peak then that it is not incontestable and it is vice-presidential is incorrect. sent3: if the bric-a-brac does rehabilitate pickings the fact that the habergeon rehabilitate pickings but it is not entomophilous is not correct. sent4: if the obverse does bid then the bric-a-brac does rehabilitate pickings. sent5: the gloxinia does not rehabilitate marasmus. sent6: if something is not vice-presidential then it is not entomophilous. sent7: there exists something such that it labors obverse and it is not a toad-in-the-hole. sent8: if something labors obverse and is not a toad-in-the-hole it is a kind of a bidding. sent9: something does rehabilitate pickings but it is non-entomophilous if it is not vice-presidential. sent10: if the fact that the habergeon is not incontestable but it is vice-presidential is not true it is not vice-presidential. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the obverse bids if it does labor obverse and it is not a toad-in-the-hole.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the obverse does labor obverse and is not a toad-in-the-hole.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the obverse does bid.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the bric-a-brac does rehabilitate pickings.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the habergeon rehabilitates pickings and is not entomophilous does not hold.; sent9 -> int5: the habergeon rehabilitates pickings but it is not entomophilous if it is not vice-presidential.; sent2 & sent1 -> int6: that the habergeon is not incontestable but it is vice-presidential does not hold.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the habergeon is not vice-presidential.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the habergeon does rehabilitate pickings but it is not entomophilous.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the obverse does labor obverse and is not a toad-in-the-hole is not true.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__