that the capuchin is not a deliverable but it is holozoic is incorrect.
sent1: that the barb is an astigmatism and holozoic is not true. sent2: if something is not an astigmatism the fact that it is a rehabilitation and it does not tumefy is incorrect. sent3: the Styrofoam is not a redoubt and tumefies if the geek does not pink warhead. sent4: the fact that the barb is a bioelectricity and is a repose is not true if it does not frost. sent5: something is not a kind of an astigmatism if it torments farm. sent6: that something is deliverable and not non-holozoic is false if it does not tumefy. sent7: if that the barb is a kind of a rehabilitation but it does not tumefy does not hold then the capuchin is not a kind of a deliverable. sent8: the capuchin is holozoic. sent9: if something is not an astigmatism that it is a rehabilitation that tumefies does not hold. sent10: if the Styrofoam is not a redoubt but it tumefies then the barb does not tumefies. sent11: the capuchin does tumefy. sent12: that the fact that the barb does tumefy and it is holozoic hold is not correct if it does not torment farm. sent13: the barb is a kind of a apostasy. sent14: if something is not a apostasy then the fact that it is an astigmatism and it torments farm is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the barb is a kind of a rehabilitation and it tumefies is incorrect. sent16: that something is a kind of an astigmatism that is a rehabilitation does not hold if it is not deliverable. sent17: the barb does torment farm and it is a kind of a apostasy. sent18: the capuchin is not a deliverable if the barb does tumefy. sent19: that the barb is both an astigmatism and holozoic is not correct if it is not deliverable. sent20: that that that something is not a kind of a deliverable but it is holozoic hold is not true if it does not torment farm is correct.
sent17 -> int1: the barb torments farm.; sent5 -> int2: the barb is not an astigmatism if it does torment farm.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the barb is not an astigmatism.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the barb is a kind of a rehabilitation but it does not tumefy is false if it is not a kind of an astigmatism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the barb is a rehabilitation and does not tumefy is incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the capuchin is not a deliverable.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the capuchin is non-deliverable thing that is holozoic is not right.
sent20 -> int7: if the capuchin does not torment farm the fact that it is not a deliverable and it is holozoic is not correct.; sent14 -> int8: that the barb is a kind of an astigmatism that torments farm is not right if the fact that it is not a apostasy hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the capuchin is not a deliverable but it is holozoic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the barb is an astigmatism and holozoic is not true. sent2: if something is not an astigmatism the fact that it is a rehabilitation and it does not tumefy is incorrect. sent3: the Styrofoam is not a redoubt and tumefies if the geek does not pink warhead. sent4: the fact that the barb is a bioelectricity and is a repose is not true if it does not frost. sent5: something is not a kind of an astigmatism if it torments farm. sent6: that something is deliverable and not non-holozoic is false if it does not tumefy. sent7: if that the barb is a kind of a rehabilitation but it does not tumefy does not hold then the capuchin is not a kind of a deliverable. sent8: the capuchin is holozoic. sent9: if something is not an astigmatism that it is a rehabilitation that tumefies does not hold. sent10: if the Styrofoam is not a redoubt but it tumefies then the barb does not tumefies. sent11: the capuchin does tumefy. sent12: that the fact that the barb does tumefy and it is holozoic hold is not correct if it does not torment farm. sent13: the barb is a kind of a apostasy. sent14: if something is not a apostasy then the fact that it is an astigmatism and it torments farm is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the barb is a kind of a rehabilitation and it tumefies is incorrect. sent16: that something is a kind of an astigmatism that is a rehabilitation does not hold if it is not deliverable. sent17: the barb does torment farm and it is a kind of a apostasy. sent18: the capuchin is not a deliverable if the barb does tumefy. sent19: that the barb is both an astigmatism and holozoic is not correct if it is not deliverable. sent20: that that that something is not a kind of a deliverable but it is holozoic hold is not true if it does not torment farm is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the barb torments farm.; sent5 -> int2: the barb is not an astigmatism if it does torment farm.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the barb is not an astigmatism.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the barb is a kind of a rehabilitation but it does not tumefy is false if it is not a kind of an astigmatism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the barb is a rehabilitation and does not tumefy is incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the capuchin is not a deliverable.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__