that the subjacentness and the interlocutoriness occurs is not right.
sent1: the mythologizing dada and the bibliolatry occurs. sent2: that the chocking contextualism does not occur and the fleshing Solomons happens leads to that the interlocutoriness happens. sent3: the fact that that both the subjacentness and the interlocutoriness occurs does not hold if that the mythologizing blocked does not occur is right is not incorrect. sent4: that the fleshing Solomons does not occur is prevented by that the mythologizing dada occurs. sent5: the mythologizing blocked and the adhesion happens. sent6: that the mythologizing dada happens causes that the chocking contextualism does not occur but the fleshing Solomons happens. sent7: that the mythologizing blocked does not occur hold if the fact that the adhesion happens and the mythologizing blocked happens does not hold. sent8: that the lahar does not occur is prevented by that the adhesion happens. sent9: if the fact that the lahar occurs is true then the subjacentness happens. sent10: the spit occurs.
sent5 -> int1: the adhesion occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the lahar occurs.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the subjacentness happens.; sent1 -> int4: the mythologizing dada happens.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the chocking contextualism does not occur and the fleshing Solomons happens.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the interlocutoriness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the subjacentness and the interlocutoriness occurs is false is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the subjacentness and the interlocutoriness occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the mythologizing dada and the bibliolatry occurs. sent2: that the chocking contextualism does not occur and the fleshing Solomons happens leads to that the interlocutoriness happens. sent3: the fact that that both the subjacentness and the interlocutoriness occurs does not hold if that the mythologizing blocked does not occur is right is not incorrect. sent4: that the fleshing Solomons does not occur is prevented by that the mythologizing dada occurs. sent5: the mythologizing blocked and the adhesion happens. sent6: that the mythologizing dada happens causes that the chocking contextualism does not occur but the fleshing Solomons happens. sent7: that the mythologizing blocked does not occur hold if the fact that the adhesion happens and the mythologizing blocked happens does not hold. sent8: that the lahar does not occur is prevented by that the adhesion happens. sent9: if the fact that the lahar occurs is true then the subjacentness happens. sent10: the spit occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the adhesion occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the lahar occurs.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the subjacentness happens.; sent1 -> int4: the mythologizing dada happens.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the chocking contextualism does not occur and the fleshing Solomons happens.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the interlocutoriness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__