the gunboat does not dissent cane and it does not dissent engineering.
sent1: the fact that the engineering is not a kind of a formulary but it guarantees preschooler is wrong. sent2: if the engineering is a WWW the gunboat does not dissent cane and it does not dissent engineering. sent3: if the engineering dissents cane and is a kind of a Prionotus it is non-ambulatory. sent4: that the gunboat dissents cane and does not dissent engineering is not right if the engineering is not a kind of a WWW. sent5: the fact that the gunboat does not dissent cane but it dissents engineering is false if the engineering is not a WWW. sent6: if something is a kind of a senior it is a WWW. sent7: if something is a kind of an adjective then it is not agonadal. sent8: if the engineering does not dissent cane then that the gunboat is a kind of an ambulatory but it does not dissent engineering is not correct. sent9: the fact that the gunboat does dissent cane but it does not dissent engineering is not true. sent10: the powerhouse is not a straightedge. sent11: if there is something such that it does not dissent Zabrze the anaspid is adjective and it is grammatical. sent12: the engineering is not a WWW if it is a kind of an ambulatory and it is a kind of a Prionotus. sent13: the chip does tumble. sent14: if the fireguard is not agonadal the engineering is a senior. sent15: if a cross-ply thing does tumble the flatworm does not dissent Zabrze. sent16: the chip is cross-ply and is infallible if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a straightedge. sent17: that the fact that the gunboat does not dissent cane and it does not dissent engineering does not hold is correct if the engineering is not a WWW. sent18: the fact that the gunboat does not dissent cane but it does dissent engineering is incorrect. sent19: the engineering is an ambulatory and a Prionotus. sent20: the engineering is a kind of an ambulatory. sent21: the engineering does not dissent engineering. sent22: the fireguard is a kind of an adjective or it is a Paterson or both if there exists something such that it is an adjective.
sent12 & sent19 -> int1: the engineering is not a WWW.; sent17 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the gunboat does not dissent cane and does not dissent engineering.
sent6 -> int2: the engineering is a WWW if it is a senior.; sent10 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a kind of a straightedge.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the chip is cross-ply thing that is infallible.; int4 -> int5: the chip is cross-ply.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the chip is cross-ply and a tumbler.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is cross-ply and is a kind of a tumbler.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the flatworm does not dissent Zabrze.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it does not dissent Zabrze is right.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the anaspid is adjective and it is grammatical.; int10 -> int11: the anaspid is adjective.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is adjective.; int12 & sent22 -> int13: the fireguard is a kind of an adjective and/or it is a kind of a Paterson.; sent7 -> int14: if the fireguard is an adjective it is not agonadal.;
$hypothesis$ = the gunboat does not dissent cane and it does not dissent engineering. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the engineering is not a kind of a formulary but it guarantees preschooler is wrong. sent2: if the engineering is a WWW the gunboat does not dissent cane and it does not dissent engineering. sent3: if the engineering dissents cane and is a kind of a Prionotus it is non-ambulatory. sent4: that the gunboat dissents cane and does not dissent engineering is not right if the engineering is not a kind of a WWW. sent5: the fact that the gunboat does not dissent cane but it dissents engineering is false if the engineering is not a WWW. sent6: if something is a kind of a senior it is a WWW. sent7: if something is a kind of an adjective then it is not agonadal. sent8: if the engineering does not dissent cane then that the gunboat is a kind of an ambulatory but it does not dissent engineering is not correct. sent9: the fact that the gunboat does dissent cane but it does not dissent engineering is not true. sent10: the powerhouse is not a straightedge. sent11: if there is something such that it does not dissent Zabrze the anaspid is adjective and it is grammatical. sent12: the engineering is not a WWW if it is a kind of an ambulatory and it is a kind of a Prionotus. sent13: the chip does tumble. sent14: if the fireguard is not agonadal the engineering is a senior. sent15: if a cross-ply thing does tumble the flatworm does not dissent Zabrze. sent16: the chip is cross-ply and is infallible if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a straightedge. sent17: that the fact that the gunboat does not dissent cane and it does not dissent engineering does not hold is correct if the engineering is not a WWW. sent18: the fact that the gunboat does not dissent cane but it does dissent engineering is incorrect. sent19: the engineering is an ambulatory and a Prionotus. sent20: the engineering is a kind of an ambulatory. sent21: the engineering does not dissent engineering. sent22: the fireguard is a kind of an adjective or it is a Paterson or both if there exists something such that it is an adjective. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent19 -> int1: the engineering is not a WWW.; sent17 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__