the fact that the goad is not unapologetic but it is a grunter is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the knout is not a minimalism but it is a kind of a Mesoamerican is false. sent2: the goad is not a operationalism. sent3: that the goad is diffuse but not a minimalism is not right if it is unapologetic. sent4: the fact that the devourer is both not unreproducible and a Mesoamerican is wrong. sent5: a non-Mesoamerican thing that is not a kind of a joint is not baccate. sent6: the quickener is not reproducible. sent7: that the knout is a kind of a neuroplasty and is a kind of a Mesoamerican is not correct. sent8: something is diffuse if it is syntactic. sent9: if that something is both joint and not a Mesoamerican is incorrect it is syntactic. sent10: something is bimorphemic if it is not seminiferous. sent11: that the devourer is non-joint thing that does diffuse is false if the knout is not reproducible. sent12: that something is a kind of reproducible thing that is not baccate does not hold if it is a kind of a voluntary. sent13: that that the knout is not syntactic but reproducible is not incorrect is false if something is not involuntary. sent14: that the goad is not unapologetic but it is a kind of a grunter is not right if something is diffuse. sent15: that something is a kind of a joint but it is not a Mesoamerican does not hold if it is baccate. sent16: something is not unapologetic but it is a grunter if it is baccate. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a joint that the devourer is both unapologetic and not unreproducible is incorrect. sent18: if the devourer is not reproducible then the quickener is not a minimalism and is not voluntary. sent19: the fact that the quickener is a kind of unreproducible thing that is syntactic is not correct. sent20: if the fact that the knout is both a grunter and not syntactic is not right then it is baccate. sent21: the devourer is not reproducible.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the knout is baccate is not correct.; sent18 & sent21 -> int1: the quickener is not a minimalism and it is not a voluntary.; sent15 -> int2: that the fact that the fact that that the knout is a kind of a joint that is not the Mesoamerican is right is not correct is correct if the knout is baccate is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int3: the knout is not non-syntactic if the fact that it is joint thing that is not a Mesoamerican is not true.; sent8 -> int4: if the knout is syntactic it does diffuse.;
the goad is not unapologetic but it is a grunter.
sent16 -> int5: the goad is a kind of non-unapologetic a grunter if it is baccate.; sent5 -> int6: if the goad is not Mesoamerican and it does not joint it is not non-baccate.; sent19 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is unreproducible and it is syntactic is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the goad is not unapologetic but it is a grunter is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the knout is not a minimalism but it is a kind of a Mesoamerican is false. sent2: the goad is not a operationalism. sent3: that the goad is diffuse but not a minimalism is not right if it is unapologetic. sent4: the fact that the devourer is both not unreproducible and a Mesoamerican is wrong. sent5: a non-Mesoamerican thing that is not a kind of a joint is not baccate. sent6: the quickener is not reproducible. sent7: that the knout is a kind of a neuroplasty and is a kind of a Mesoamerican is not correct. sent8: something is diffuse if it is syntactic. sent9: if that something is both joint and not a Mesoamerican is incorrect it is syntactic. sent10: something is bimorphemic if it is not seminiferous. sent11: that the devourer is non-joint thing that does diffuse is false if the knout is not reproducible. sent12: that something is a kind of reproducible thing that is not baccate does not hold if it is a kind of a voluntary. sent13: that that the knout is not syntactic but reproducible is not incorrect is false if something is not involuntary. sent14: that the goad is not unapologetic but it is a kind of a grunter is not right if something is diffuse. sent15: that something is a kind of a joint but it is not a Mesoamerican does not hold if it is baccate. sent16: something is not unapologetic but it is a grunter if it is baccate. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a joint that the devourer is both unapologetic and not unreproducible is incorrect. sent18: if the devourer is not reproducible then the quickener is not a minimalism and is not voluntary. sent19: the fact that the quickener is a kind of unreproducible thing that is syntactic is not correct. sent20: if the fact that the knout is both a grunter and not syntactic is not right then it is baccate. sent21: the devourer is not reproducible. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the knout is baccate is not correct.; sent18 & sent21 -> int1: the quickener is not a minimalism and it is not a voluntary.; sent15 -> int2: that the fact that the fact that that the knout is a kind of a joint that is not the Mesoamerican is right is not correct is correct if the knout is baccate is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int3: the knout is not non-syntactic if the fact that it is joint thing that is not a Mesoamerican is not true.; sent8 -> int4: if the knout is syntactic it does diffuse.; __UNKNOWN__