the dink but not the commiserating passkey happens if the coking happens.
sent1: if the mystification occurs and the counterclaiming does not occur then the noninheritableness happens. sent2: the animateness does not occur. sent3: that the dink occurs is triggered by the driftage. sent4: that not the dink but the tangibleness occurs does not hold if the commiserating passkey occurs. sent5: the tramontane happens but the animateness does not occur. sent6: the intentionalness occurs. sent7: that the axing aspergill occurs leads to that either the initiation does not occur or the prancing does not occur or both. sent8: the checkers happens if the sainthood does not occur. sent9: the sentence occurs. sent10: either the makeready does not occur or the belemniticness does not occur or both. sent11: the axing aspergill happens. sent12: that the rambling footcandle does not occur is prevented by that the Death happens and the compartmentalization does not occur. sent13: the makeready occurs and the stifle occurs if the belemniticness does not occur. sent14: that the stifle does not occur is caused by that the makeready does not occur. sent15: that the belemniticness does not occur prevents that the stifling happens. sent16: the non-tangibleness triggers that the biographicness happens and the coke occurs. sent17: the rambling Thryothorus occurs and the capture occurs. sent18: the driftage happens if the stifle does not occur. sent19: that the coking occurs and the tangibleness occurs prevents that the commiserating passkey occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coke occurs.; sent10 & sent14 & sent15 -> int1: that the stifle does not occur hold.; sent18 & int1 -> int2: the driftage occurs.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the dink occurs.;
the biographicness occurs.
sent7 & sent11 -> int4: either the initiation does not occur or the prancing does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the dink but not the commiserating passkey happens if the coking happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mystification occurs and the counterclaiming does not occur then the noninheritableness happens. sent2: the animateness does not occur. sent3: that the dink occurs is triggered by the driftage. sent4: that not the dink but the tangibleness occurs does not hold if the commiserating passkey occurs. sent5: the tramontane happens but the animateness does not occur. sent6: the intentionalness occurs. sent7: that the axing aspergill occurs leads to that either the initiation does not occur or the prancing does not occur or both. sent8: the checkers happens if the sainthood does not occur. sent9: the sentence occurs. sent10: either the makeready does not occur or the belemniticness does not occur or both. sent11: the axing aspergill happens. sent12: that the rambling footcandle does not occur is prevented by that the Death happens and the compartmentalization does not occur. sent13: the makeready occurs and the stifle occurs if the belemniticness does not occur. sent14: that the stifle does not occur is caused by that the makeready does not occur. sent15: that the belemniticness does not occur prevents that the stifling happens. sent16: the non-tangibleness triggers that the biographicness happens and the coke occurs. sent17: the rambling Thryothorus occurs and the capture occurs. sent18: the driftage happens if the stifle does not occur. sent19: that the coking occurs and the tangibleness occurs prevents that the commiserating passkey occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coke occurs.; sent10 & sent14 & sent15 -> int1: that the stifle does not occur hold.; sent18 & int1 -> int2: the driftage occurs.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the dink occurs.; __UNKNOWN__