the throstle is papillary.
sent1: the fact that the devilfish is a kind of a pseudoephedrine and does horripilate is false. sent2: something that does scent Crossopterygii is papillary. sent3: that the throstle is a signalization hold. sent4: if the fact that the autoantibody is not a signalization or it is a kind of an internationalism or both does not hold that the tachylite is a kind of a pseudoephedrine is right. sent5: if the throstle does not scent Crossopterygii then the fact that the autoantibody is not a signalization and/or it is an internationalism is not true. sent6: the devilfish is an internationalism if the autoantibody does not horripilate. sent7: if the fact that there exists something such that that it is a kind of a pseudoephedrine and it horripilates is incorrect is not wrong the tachylite is not a kind of a pseudoephedrine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the throstle does not scent Crossopterygii is not incorrect.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the autoantibody is not a signalization or it is a kind of an internationalism or both is false.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the tachylite is a kind of a pseudoephedrine.; sent1 -> int3: there is something such that that it is a kind of a pseudoephedrine that does horripilate does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the tachylite is not a pseudoephedrine.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the throstle scents Crossopterygii.; sent2 -> int7: the throstle is papillary if it scents Crossopterygii.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the throstle is papillary. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the devilfish is a kind of a pseudoephedrine and does horripilate is false. sent2: something that does scent Crossopterygii is papillary. sent3: that the throstle is a signalization hold. sent4: if the fact that the autoantibody is not a signalization or it is a kind of an internationalism or both does not hold that the tachylite is a kind of a pseudoephedrine is right. sent5: if the throstle does not scent Crossopterygii then the fact that the autoantibody is not a signalization and/or it is an internationalism is not true. sent6: the devilfish is an internationalism if the autoantibody does not horripilate. sent7: if the fact that there exists something such that that it is a kind of a pseudoephedrine and it horripilates is incorrect is not wrong the tachylite is not a kind of a pseudoephedrine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the throstle does not scent Crossopterygii is not incorrect.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the autoantibody is not a signalization or it is a kind of an internationalism or both is false.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the tachylite is a kind of a pseudoephedrine.; sent1 -> int3: there is something such that that it is a kind of a pseudoephedrine that does horripilate does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the tachylite is not a pseudoephedrine.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the throstle scents Crossopterygii.; sent2 -> int7: the throstle is papillary if it scents Crossopterygii.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__