the beggarman dabs elegance.
sent1: if there is something such that it does dab wagtail then the fact that the wagtail is non-ambiversive thing that compromises cerebellum does not hold. sent2: the beggarman does not dab elegance if there exists something such that it is not innocuous and it is a mince. sent3: if the beggarman is a mince then the fact that the cytologist does not compromise cerebellum or is vacuolate or both is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the beggarman is not ambiversive is not wrong if the wagtail does not dab wagtail or is not ambiversive or both. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not vacuolate the cytologist is a kind of non-innocuous thing that is a mince. sent6: if the decalescence dabs elegance and is not a kind of a mince the beggarman is a mince. sent7: if the wagtail compromises cerebellum it does not dab wagtail and/or it is not ambiversive. sent8: the decalescence dabs elegance and does not mince if that it is not innocuous is correct. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-ambiversive thing that compromises cerebellum is not right the Alnico is not vacuolate. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is ambiversive and it does compromise cerebellum is not true. sent11: there is something such that it does dab wagtail. sent12: if something either does dab elegance or is not ambiversive or both it dab elegance. sent13: if there exists something such that that it does not compromise cerebellum or it is vacuolate or both is not true then the Alnico is ambiversive. sent14: something is not ambiversive but it does compromise cerebellum.
sent11 & sent1 -> int1: that the wagtail is not ambiversive but it compromises cerebellum does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-ambiversive thing that does compromise cerebellum is false.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the Alnico is not vacuolate.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not vacuolate is right.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the cytologist is not innocuous but it is a mince.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is non-innocuous and it minces.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the beggarman dabs elegance.
sent12 -> int7: if either the beggarman does dab elegance or it is not ambiversive or both it dab elegance.;
$hypothesis$ = the beggarman dabs elegance. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does dab wagtail then the fact that the wagtail is non-ambiversive thing that compromises cerebellum does not hold. sent2: the beggarman does not dab elegance if there exists something such that it is not innocuous and it is a mince. sent3: if the beggarman is a mince then the fact that the cytologist does not compromise cerebellum or is vacuolate or both is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the beggarman is not ambiversive is not wrong if the wagtail does not dab wagtail or is not ambiversive or both. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not vacuolate the cytologist is a kind of non-innocuous thing that is a mince. sent6: if the decalescence dabs elegance and is not a kind of a mince the beggarman is a mince. sent7: if the wagtail compromises cerebellum it does not dab wagtail and/or it is not ambiversive. sent8: the decalescence dabs elegance and does not mince if that it is not innocuous is correct. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-ambiversive thing that compromises cerebellum is not right the Alnico is not vacuolate. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is ambiversive and it does compromise cerebellum is not true. sent11: there is something such that it does dab wagtail. sent12: if something either does dab elegance or is not ambiversive or both it dab elegance. sent13: if there exists something such that that it does not compromise cerebellum or it is vacuolate or both is not true then the Alnico is ambiversive. sent14: something is not ambiversive but it does compromise cerebellum. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent1 -> int1: that the wagtail is not ambiversive but it compromises cerebellum does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-ambiversive thing that does compromise cerebellum is false.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the Alnico is not vacuolate.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not vacuolate is right.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the cytologist is not innocuous but it is a mince.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is non-innocuous and it minces.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__