that the galena is not a paroxytone but it is a abstractionism if the tenpins is a hairlessness is not true.
sent1: if the galena is not ctenoid the scleroprotein is ctenoid. sent2: if something is a hairlessness and it is a feeding the Nesselrode is not a abstractionism. sent3: if the Nesselrode is not a kind of a abstractionism then the galena is both a paroxytone and a abstractionism. sent4: if the scleroprotein is not non-ctenoid then the Nesselrode is non-ctenoid. sent5: the sweetsop is a Lythrum if the scleroprotein is a salami. sent6: the ranger is a paroxytone. sent7: the galena is a abstractionism if the tenpins is a kind of a hairlessness. sent8: if the tenpins is a kind of a Lythrum the sweetsop is a hairlessness. sent9: if the sweetsop is a Lythrum then the tenpins feeds. sent10: the scleroprotein is a kind of a hairlessness. sent11: the galena is a kind of a paroxytone if the tenpins is not a paroxytone. sent12: something is a hairlessness. sent13: if the galena is a feeding the tenpins is a paroxytone. sent14: the sweetsop is a kind of a Lythrum if the scleroprotein is ctenoid. sent15: the galena is a paroxytone and a abstractionism. sent16: that the galena is a kind of a abstractionism hold if the Nesselrode is not a abstractionism. sent17: there is something such that it is a abstractionism. sent18: the galena is a abstractionism. sent19: if the Nesselrode is not a abstractionism the galena is not a paroxytone and is a abstractionism. sent20: if the fact that the tenpins is a hairlessness is right the galena is a paroxytone and a abstractionism. sent21: there exists something such that it feeds. sent22: the sweetsop is not a abstractionism if something is both a Lythrum and a feeding. sent23: something is a paroxytone and it is a kind of a abstractionism. sent24: if the Nesselrode is a Lythrum then the sweetsop is a abstractionism. sent25: the scleroprotein is either ctenoid or a salami or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tenpins is a kind of a hairlessness.; sent25 & sent14 & sent5 -> int1: the sweetsop is a kind of a Lythrum.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the tenpins feeds.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: the tenpins is a hairlessness that feeds.; int3 -> int4: that something is a hairlessness and it feeds is right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the Nesselrode is not a abstractionism.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: the galena is not a kind of a paroxytone but it is a abstractionism.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the Nesselrode is ctenoid.
$hypothesis$ = that the galena is not a paroxytone but it is a abstractionism if the tenpins is a hairlessness is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the galena is not ctenoid the scleroprotein is ctenoid. sent2: if something is a hairlessness and it is a feeding the Nesselrode is not a abstractionism. sent3: if the Nesselrode is not a kind of a abstractionism then the galena is both a paroxytone and a abstractionism. sent4: if the scleroprotein is not non-ctenoid then the Nesselrode is non-ctenoid. sent5: the sweetsop is a Lythrum if the scleroprotein is a salami. sent6: the ranger is a paroxytone. sent7: the galena is a abstractionism if the tenpins is a kind of a hairlessness. sent8: if the tenpins is a kind of a Lythrum the sweetsop is a hairlessness. sent9: if the sweetsop is a Lythrum then the tenpins feeds. sent10: the scleroprotein is a kind of a hairlessness. sent11: the galena is a kind of a paroxytone if the tenpins is not a paroxytone. sent12: something is a hairlessness. sent13: if the galena is a feeding the tenpins is a paroxytone. sent14: the sweetsop is a kind of a Lythrum if the scleroprotein is ctenoid. sent15: the galena is a paroxytone and a abstractionism. sent16: that the galena is a kind of a abstractionism hold if the Nesselrode is not a abstractionism. sent17: there is something such that it is a abstractionism. sent18: the galena is a abstractionism. sent19: if the Nesselrode is not a abstractionism the galena is not a paroxytone and is a abstractionism. sent20: if the fact that the tenpins is a hairlessness is right the galena is a paroxytone and a abstractionism. sent21: there exists something such that it feeds. sent22: the sweetsop is not a abstractionism if something is both a Lythrum and a feeding. sent23: something is a paroxytone and it is a kind of a abstractionism. sent24: if the Nesselrode is a Lythrum then the sweetsop is a abstractionism. sent25: the scleroprotein is either ctenoid or a salami or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tenpins is a kind of a hairlessness.; sent25 & sent14 & sent5 -> int1: the sweetsop is a kind of a Lythrum.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the tenpins feeds.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: the tenpins is a hairlessness that feeds.; int3 -> int4: that something is a hairlessness and it feeds is right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the Nesselrode is not a abstractionism.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: the galena is not a kind of a paroxytone but it is a abstractionism.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__