the fact that that the cinerariness does not occur but the damper occurs is false if the isomerization happens is not true.
sent1: that the isomerization does not occur is brought about by that the non-cinerariness and the damper happens. sent2: the cinerariness does not occur. sent3: the fact that both the acquainting awlwort and the promising occurs is not right. sent4: the fact that the racketeering occurs and the needle happens is not right. sent5: the fact that the cinerariness occurs and the damper happens is false if the isomerization occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the cinerariness but the damper occurs.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the isomerization does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the isomerization happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that not the cinerariness but the damper occurs is false.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the cinerariness does not occur but the damper occurs is false if the isomerization happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the isomerization does not occur is brought about by that the non-cinerariness and the damper happens. sent2: the cinerariness does not occur. sent3: the fact that both the acquainting awlwort and the promising occurs is not right. sent4: the fact that the racketeering occurs and the needle happens is not right. sent5: the fact that the cinerariness occurs and the damper happens is false if the isomerization occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the cinerariness but the damper occurs.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the isomerization does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the isomerization happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that not the cinerariness but the damper occurs is false.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__