that the ravehook is a kind of a swan that ejaculates isthmus is not correct.
sent1: if the gear does not ejaculate isthmus then the ravehook is a swan that does ejaculate isthmus. sent2: the dust does alternate. sent3: the axletree swans if the gear is a swans. sent4: the anthracite does swan. sent5: the anthracite is a referenced. sent6: the anthracite is alternating thing that is a diploidy. sent7: the ravehook ejaculates isthmus and it is a referenced if the gear is not a referenced. sent8: something does not seep axletree and is a kind of a trump if it does alternate. sent9: the gear is alternating and a trump if the anthracite does not trump. sent10: if the gear is alternating then it does trump. sent11: that the ravehook swans and it does ejaculate isthmus is not right if it does not seep axletree. sent12: the gear is a kind of a triskaidekaphobia. sent13: the gear sags brahman and is not a kind of a representative. sent14: the isthmus does not sag fingered but it is alternating. sent15: if the gear does trump then that the anthracite does not seep axletree and does trump is not true. sent16: if something that does sag brahman is not a kind of a representative it is a kind of a Hawaii. sent17: the gear is both not a referenced and a trump if it does ejaculate isthmus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gear ejaculates isthmus.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the gear is not a referenced but a trump.; int1 -> int2: the gear trumps.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the anthracite does not seep axletree but it trumps does not hold.; sent8 -> int4: if the fact that the anthracite is alternating hold it does not seep axletree and it does trump.; sent6 -> int5: the anthracite does alternate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the anthracite does not seep axletree and is a trump.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the gear does not ejaculate isthmus.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the axletree swans.
$hypothesis$ = that the ravehook is a kind of a swan that ejaculates isthmus is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gear does not ejaculate isthmus then the ravehook is a swan that does ejaculate isthmus. sent2: the dust does alternate. sent3: the axletree swans if the gear is a swans. sent4: the anthracite does swan. sent5: the anthracite is a referenced. sent6: the anthracite is alternating thing that is a diploidy. sent7: the ravehook ejaculates isthmus and it is a referenced if the gear is not a referenced. sent8: something does not seep axletree and is a kind of a trump if it does alternate. sent9: the gear is alternating and a trump if the anthracite does not trump. sent10: if the gear is alternating then it does trump. sent11: that the ravehook swans and it does ejaculate isthmus is not right if it does not seep axletree. sent12: the gear is a kind of a triskaidekaphobia. sent13: the gear sags brahman and is not a kind of a representative. sent14: the isthmus does not sag fingered but it is alternating. sent15: if the gear does trump then that the anthracite does not seep axletree and does trump is not true. sent16: if something that does sag brahman is not a kind of a representative it is a kind of a Hawaii. sent17: the gear is both not a referenced and a trump if it does ejaculate isthmus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gear ejaculates isthmus.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the gear is not a referenced but a trump.; int1 -> int2: the gear trumps.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the anthracite does not seep axletree but it trumps does not hold.; sent8 -> int4: if the fact that the anthracite is alternating hold it does not seep axletree and it does trump.; sent6 -> int5: the anthracite does alternate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the anthracite does not seep axletree and is a trump.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the gear does not ejaculate isthmus.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__