the chalk is non-mutagenic thing that does nag eyewitness.
sent1: the volumeter is not a kind of a raising. sent2: the fact that the spongioblast is mutagenic hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Minsk that does not nag eyewitness is not true. sent3: something that is not a Carthaginian does not nag eyewitness and is not a good. sent4: the fact that the chalk is not mutagenic and does nag eyewitness is incorrect if the sycophant is mutagenic. sent5: that the sycophant does nag eyewitness but it is not mutagenic is not right. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that that it is a Minsk and it is not a swordtail is not incorrect is not correct then the sycophant is mutagenic. sent7: the sycophant does chomp aspirin if the chalk is a kind of non-mutagenic thing that chomp aspirin. sent8: if the harebell does not nag eyewitness and is not a kind of a good then the Nahuatl nag eyewitness. sent9: the fact that the spongioblast is a kind of a Minsk that is not a kind of a swordtail is false. sent10: if the sycophant chomps aspirin then the two-by-four does chomps aspirin. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is homiletic and it does not treadle is not true then the nombril is not homiletic. sent12: the harebell is not a Carthaginian if a non-haptic thing is basal. sent13: there exists something such that that it is mutagenic and it is not a Minsk is not true. sent14: something is a Minsk but it is not a swordtail. sent15: if the fact that the volumeter is not a kind of a raising is right it is not a podetium and it repents pogge. sent16: the vagus is a bodywork if something that is not a podetium repents pogge. sent17: the orthoclase is not haptic but it is basal if the fact that the nombril is homiletic is wrong. sent18: if the vagus is a bodywork then the fact that the Rheum is homiletic and does not treadle is not true.
sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a Minsk and it is not a kind of a swordtail is false.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the sycophant is mutagenic.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the two-by-four does chomp aspirin.
sent3 -> int3: if the fact that the harebell is not Carthaginian is not wrong it does not nag eyewitness and it is not a good.; sent15 & sent1 -> int4: the volumeter is not a podetium and repents pogge.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a podetium and it does repent pogge.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: that the vagus is a kind of a bodywork hold.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the Rheum is homiletic thing that does not treadle is right is not right.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is homiletic and it does not treadle is not correct.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the nombril is not homiletic.; sent17 & int9 -> int10: the orthoclase is not haptic but it is basal.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is not haptic and is basal.; int11 & sent12 -> int12: the harebell is not a kind of a Carthaginian.; int3 & int12 -> int13: the harebell does not nag eyewitness and it is not good.; sent8 & int13 -> int14: the Nahuatl does nag eyewitness.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it nags eyewitness.;
$hypothesis$ = the chalk is non-mutagenic thing that does nag eyewitness. ; $context$ = sent1: the volumeter is not a kind of a raising. sent2: the fact that the spongioblast is mutagenic hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Minsk that does not nag eyewitness is not true. sent3: something that is not a Carthaginian does not nag eyewitness and is not a good. sent4: the fact that the chalk is not mutagenic and does nag eyewitness is incorrect if the sycophant is mutagenic. sent5: that the sycophant does nag eyewitness but it is not mutagenic is not right. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that that it is a Minsk and it is not a swordtail is not incorrect is not correct then the sycophant is mutagenic. sent7: the sycophant does chomp aspirin if the chalk is a kind of non-mutagenic thing that chomp aspirin. sent8: if the harebell does not nag eyewitness and is not a kind of a good then the Nahuatl nag eyewitness. sent9: the fact that the spongioblast is a kind of a Minsk that is not a kind of a swordtail is false. sent10: if the sycophant chomps aspirin then the two-by-four does chomps aspirin. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is homiletic and it does not treadle is not true then the nombril is not homiletic. sent12: the harebell is not a Carthaginian if a non-haptic thing is basal. sent13: there exists something such that that it is mutagenic and it is not a Minsk is not true. sent14: something is a Minsk but it is not a swordtail. sent15: if the fact that the volumeter is not a kind of a raising is right it is not a podetium and it repents pogge. sent16: the vagus is a bodywork if something that is not a podetium repents pogge. sent17: the orthoclase is not haptic but it is basal if the fact that the nombril is homiletic is wrong. sent18: if the vagus is a bodywork then the fact that the Rheum is homiletic and does not treadle is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a Minsk and it is not a kind of a swordtail is false.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the sycophant is mutagenic.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__