the prior is a graphology.
sent1: the schnorrer is not curatorial if there exists something such that it is a Fez and does not mythologize heliotherapy. sent2: if something is not Mozartian the fact that the scalper is a Fez and is not a kind of a Globicephala is incorrect. sent3: the tablemate is not myotonic. sent4: the scalper is Mozartian if that the fact that it is a Globicephala and it is not secular is correct is not correct. sent5: that the scalper is not Mozartian hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not an extraction and not a topping is false. sent6: the fact that something is Mozartian but it is not curatorial does not hold if it does mythologize heliotherapy. sent7: if something is not Mozartian then it is a Fez but not a graphology. sent8: the schnorrer mythologizes heliotherapy. sent9: the proximity is not an extraction. sent10: there exists something such that it chocks morphophoneme. sent11: the fact that the occultist does not mythologize heliotherapy but it is a kind of a Cochlearius is wrong if there exists something such that it is not myotonic. sent12: there exists something such that it is a Cochlearius and is curatorial. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is not an extraction and it does not top is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a kind of an extraction the scalper is curatorial and does mythologize heliotherapy. sent15: the proximity is a Fez if the scalper is a Globicephala but not secular. sent16: the proximity does not mythologize heliotherapy if the fact that the occultist does not mythologize heliotherapy but it is a Cochlearius is not correct. sent17: the prior is a graphology if the schnorrer is not curatorial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the scalper is a kind of a Globicephala but it is not secular is not right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the scalper is Mozartian.; sent13 & sent5 -> int2: that the scalper is not Mozartian hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the scalper is a kind of a Globicephala and is not secular.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the proximity is a Fez.; sent3 -> int6: there is something such that it is not myotonic.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the fact that the occultist does not mythologize heliotherapy and is a Cochlearius is not correct.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the proximity does not mythologize heliotherapy.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the proximity is a kind of a Fez but it does not mythologize heliotherapy.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a Fez and it does not mythologize heliotherapy.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the schnorrer is not curatorial.; int11 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the prior is not a graphology.
sent7 -> int12: that the prior is a kind of a Fez that is not a graphology is true if it is not Mozartian.; sent9 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not an extraction.; int13 & sent14 -> int14: the scalper is curatorial thing that mythologizes heliotherapy.; int14 -> int15: the scalper mythologizes heliotherapy.; int15 -> int16: something does mythologize heliotherapy.;
$hypothesis$ = the prior is a graphology. ; $context$ = sent1: the schnorrer is not curatorial if there exists something such that it is a Fez and does not mythologize heliotherapy. sent2: if something is not Mozartian the fact that the scalper is a Fez and is not a kind of a Globicephala is incorrect. sent3: the tablemate is not myotonic. sent4: the scalper is Mozartian if that the fact that it is a Globicephala and it is not secular is correct is not correct. sent5: that the scalper is not Mozartian hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not an extraction and not a topping is false. sent6: the fact that something is Mozartian but it is not curatorial does not hold if it does mythologize heliotherapy. sent7: if something is not Mozartian then it is a Fez but not a graphology. sent8: the schnorrer mythologizes heliotherapy. sent9: the proximity is not an extraction. sent10: there exists something such that it chocks morphophoneme. sent11: the fact that the occultist does not mythologize heliotherapy but it is a kind of a Cochlearius is wrong if there exists something such that it is not myotonic. sent12: there exists something such that it is a Cochlearius and is curatorial. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is not an extraction and it does not top is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a kind of an extraction the scalper is curatorial and does mythologize heliotherapy. sent15: the proximity is a Fez if the scalper is a Globicephala but not secular. sent16: the proximity does not mythologize heliotherapy if the fact that the occultist does not mythologize heliotherapy but it is a Cochlearius is not correct. sent17: the prior is a graphology if the schnorrer is not curatorial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the scalper is a kind of a Globicephala but it is not secular is not right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the scalper is Mozartian.; sent13 & sent5 -> int2: that the scalper is not Mozartian hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the scalper is a kind of a Globicephala and is not secular.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the proximity is a Fez.; sent3 -> int6: there is something such that it is not myotonic.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the fact that the occultist does not mythologize heliotherapy and is a Cochlearius is not correct.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the proximity does not mythologize heliotherapy.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the proximity is a kind of a Fez but it does not mythologize heliotherapy.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a Fez and it does not mythologize heliotherapy.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the schnorrer is not curatorial.; int11 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__