the fact that the itineration does not occur is not false.
sent1: the fact that the inefficaciousness does not occur and the non-engagement does not occur is not right. sent2: the communication does not occur. sent3: if the isomerization does not occur the non-engagement does not occur. sent4: the fact that the susurration does not occur and the unpicking does not occur is false. sent5: if the itineration occurs then the defacement occurs. sent6: the defacement does not occur if that the fact that the inefficaciousness does not occur and the non-engagement does not occur is false hold. sent7: that the inefficaciousness does not occur and the non-engagement occurs is not right. sent8: if the non-engagement occurs then the defacement does not occur. sent9: the isomerization happens. sent10: the isomerization does not occur if that the isomerization and the Romansh occurs does not hold. sent11: the itineration occurs and the defacement happens if the inefficaciousness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the itineration happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the defacement happens.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the defacement does not occur is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the itineration occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the itineration does not occur is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the inefficaciousness does not occur and the non-engagement does not occur is not right. sent2: the communication does not occur. sent3: if the isomerization does not occur the non-engagement does not occur. sent4: the fact that the susurration does not occur and the unpicking does not occur is false. sent5: if the itineration occurs then the defacement occurs. sent6: the defacement does not occur if that the fact that the inefficaciousness does not occur and the non-engagement does not occur is false hold. sent7: that the inefficaciousness does not occur and the non-engagement occurs is not right. sent8: if the non-engagement occurs then the defacement does not occur. sent9: the isomerization happens. sent10: the isomerization does not occur if that the isomerization and the Romansh occurs does not hold. sent11: the itineration occurs and the defacement happens if the inefficaciousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the itineration happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the defacement happens.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the defacement does not occur is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__