that that the mobile does not resettle and is not a Boehme is correct is wrong.
sent1: something is not a pixel and it does not trickle if it does cram. sent2: the fact that the milkwort is not a wigged and does not trickle is not right if the fact that the dallisgrass is not a wigged is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the milkwort is not a wigged and trickles does not hold if the dallisgrass is not a wigged. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is associative and it is not a broadcaster is false. sent5: the pizza is not a kind of a regionalism. sent6: if the dallisgrass is not a wigged then that the synonymist is a wigged and does not resettle is not true. sent7: if the milkwort is not a pixel then the fact that the pizza is both unconscientious and a pixel is not correct. sent8: if the pizza is not unconscientious then that the dallisgrass is not a kind of a wigged but it is a kind of a photocoagulator does not hold. sent9: if something is not a pixel and does not trickle then the mobile does not resettle. sent10: the mobile is not a Boehme if the fact that the dallisgrass is not a wigged but it is a kind of a photocoagulator is not right. sent11: that the mobile does not resettle but it is a Boehme is wrong. sent12: if the milkwort does not resettle the fact that the synonymist does not resettle and it is not a wigged does not hold. sent13: the fact that the mobile resettles and is not a Boehme is wrong. sent14: if the marjoram is not a motile the fact that the synonymist does not smock proselytism and it is not unconscientious is incorrect. sent15: the pizza is not unconscientious if that the synonymist does not smock proselytism and is not unconscientious does not hold. sent16: that the dallisgrass resettles and it is a wigged does not hold. sent17: if that something is not a wigged and does not trickle is not right then that it is not a kind of a pixel is true. sent18: if the milkwort trickles then it is not a pixel. sent19: the fact that the mobile does not resettle and it is not a Boehme is not right if the synonymist does not resettle. sent20: something is not a pixel if it does trickle. sent21: if that that the pizza is both not conscientious and a pixel is not wrong is incorrect then the synonymist does not resettle. sent22: if the fact that the milkwort does not resettle and does not trickle does not hold then it is not unconscientious. sent23: if there is something such that that it is associative and it is not a broadcaster is incorrect then the SALT is a broadcaster. sent24: if the synonymist does not resettle then that the mobile does not resettle and is a Boehme is not right. sent25: if there exists something such that it is a photocoagulator the dallisgrass is not a wigged.
sent17 -> int1: that the milkwort is not a pixel hold if that it is not a kind of a wigged and does not trickle is not correct.;
the mobile does not resettle and is not a kind of a Boehme.
sent1 -> int2: the milkwort is not a pixel and does not trickle if it crams.; sent4 & sent23 -> int3: the SALT is a kind of a broadcaster.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a broadcaster.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the mobile does not resettle and is not a Boehme is correct is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a pixel and it does not trickle if it does cram. sent2: the fact that the milkwort is not a wigged and does not trickle is not right if the fact that the dallisgrass is not a wigged is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the milkwort is not a wigged and trickles does not hold if the dallisgrass is not a wigged. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is associative and it is not a broadcaster is false. sent5: the pizza is not a kind of a regionalism. sent6: if the dallisgrass is not a wigged then that the synonymist is a wigged and does not resettle is not true. sent7: if the milkwort is not a pixel then the fact that the pizza is both unconscientious and a pixel is not correct. sent8: if the pizza is not unconscientious then that the dallisgrass is not a kind of a wigged but it is a kind of a photocoagulator does not hold. sent9: if something is not a pixel and does not trickle then the mobile does not resettle. sent10: the mobile is not a Boehme if the fact that the dallisgrass is not a wigged but it is a kind of a photocoagulator is not right. sent11: that the mobile does not resettle but it is a Boehme is wrong. sent12: if the milkwort does not resettle the fact that the synonymist does not resettle and it is not a wigged does not hold. sent13: the fact that the mobile resettles and is not a Boehme is wrong. sent14: if the marjoram is not a motile the fact that the synonymist does not smock proselytism and it is not unconscientious is incorrect. sent15: the pizza is not unconscientious if that the synonymist does not smock proselytism and is not unconscientious does not hold. sent16: that the dallisgrass resettles and it is a wigged does not hold. sent17: if that something is not a wigged and does not trickle is not right then that it is not a kind of a pixel is true. sent18: if the milkwort trickles then it is not a pixel. sent19: the fact that the mobile does not resettle and it is not a Boehme is not right if the synonymist does not resettle. sent20: something is not a pixel if it does trickle. sent21: if that that the pizza is both not conscientious and a pixel is not wrong is incorrect then the synonymist does not resettle. sent22: if the fact that the milkwort does not resettle and does not trickle does not hold then it is not unconscientious. sent23: if there is something such that that it is associative and it is not a broadcaster is incorrect then the SALT is a broadcaster. sent24: if the synonymist does not resettle then that the mobile does not resettle and is a Boehme is not right. sent25: if there exists something such that it is a photocoagulator the dallisgrass is not a wigged. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: that the milkwort is not a pixel hold if that it is not a kind of a wigged and does not trickle is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__