that that the racism does not occur but the meander happens is true does not hold.
sent1: that the practicalness does not occur is triggered by the subjecting windjammer. sent2: if both the non-senatorialness and the matricide occurs the shining does not occur. sent3: not the elbowing but the petrissage happens. sent4: if the narrating channel does not occur and the subjecting manat occurs the cruising does not occur. sent5: if the foremanship does not occur the fact that the Holocaust and the narrating Gironde happens is wrong. sent6: the subjecting fibrinopeptide does not occur. sent7: if the racism happens and the meander happens the Holocaust does not occur. sent8: the fact that the racism does not occur is not false. sent9: if the uppercut happens the foremanship does not occur but the subjecting ectoproct happens. sent10: the unseamanlikeness does not occur if not the intralinguisticness but the narrating Muslim occurs. sent11: if the toilet occurs the uppercut occurs. sent12: the racism does not occur and the meander happens if that the narrating Gironde does not occur is not wrong. sent13: both the peaking and the stultification occurs. sent14: that both the racism and the meander occurs does not hold. sent15: the fact that the sending does not occur but the scuffing occurs is true. sent16: the decapitation occurs and the ungregariousness occurs. sent17: both the toilet and the interpreting happens if the practicalness does not occur. sent18: the narrating Gironde does not occur if the fact that the Holocaust and the narrating Gironde happens is incorrect. sent19: that not the tsking but the subjecting Bruno occurs prevents that the remedy happens. sent20: the narrating Gironde occurs and the Holocaust happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the racism does not occur and the meander occurs.; sent20 -> int1: the Holocaust happens.;
that the racism does not occur and the meander happens is right.
$hypothesis$ = that that the racism does not occur but the meander happens is true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the practicalness does not occur is triggered by the subjecting windjammer. sent2: if both the non-senatorialness and the matricide occurs the shining does not occur. sent3: not the elbowing but the petrissage happens. sent4: if the narrating channel does not occur and the subjecting manat occurs the cruising does not occur. sent5: if the foremanship does not occur the fact that the Holocaust and the narrating Gironde happens is wrong. sent6: the subjecting fibrinopeptide does not occur. sent7: if the racism happens and the meander happens the Holocaust does not occur. sent8: the fact that the racism does not occur is not false. sent9: if the uppercut happens the foremanship does not occur but the subjecting ectoproct happens. sent10: the unseamanlikeness does not occur if not the intralinguisticness but the narrating Muslim occurs. sent11: if the toilet occurs the uppercut occurs. sent12: the racism does not occur and the meander happens if that the narrating Gironde does not occur is not wrong. sent13: both the peaking and the stultification occurs. sent14: that both the racism and the meander occurs does not hold. sent15: the fact that the sending does not occur but the scuffing occurs is true. sent16: the decapitation occurs and the ungregariousness occurs. sent17: both the toilet and the interpreting happens if the practicalness does not occur. sent18: the narrating Gironde does not occur if the fact that the Holocaust and the narrating Gironde happens is incorrect. sent19: that not the tsking but the subjecting Bruno occurs prevents that the remedy happens. sent20: the narrating Gironde occurs and the Holocaust happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the racism does not occur and the meander occurs.; sent20 -> int1: the Holocaust happens.; __UNKNOWN__