there exists something such that if it contributes vibrio then the fact that that it is not cooling and it does overhang hold is not correct.
sent1: that the croup is an overhang and it is a kind of a coldcream is incorrect if it is a kind of a technician. sent2: that the fact that something does not contribute Roswell but it spies is not true if that it is inconsolable is not wrong is correct. sent3: there is something such that if it does numb then the fact that it is not a FTO and does flame is false. sent4: there exists something such that if it does contribute vibrio that it is cooling and is an overhang is incorrect. sent5: if the croup contributes vibrio then the fact that it is not a kind of a cooling and it does overhang does not hold. sent6: the croup is not a cooling and is an overhang if it contributes vibrio. sent7: that something is a kind of non-bromic thing that is rabbinical is wrong if it overhangs. sent8: there exists something such that if it does contribute baiting then that it is orthopedics and it is centroidal is not correct.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is inconsolable that it does not contribute Roswell and does spy is wrong.
sent2 -> int1: if the Chad is inconsolable that it does not contribute Roswell and it is a kind of a spy is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it contributes vibrio then the fact that that it is not cooling and it does overhang hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the croup is an overhang and it is a kind of a coldcream is incorrect if it is a kind of a technician. sent2: that the fact that something does not contribute Roswell but it spies is not true if that it is inconsolable is not wrong is correct. sent3: there is something such that if it does numb then the fact that it is not a FTO and does flame is false. sent4: there exists something such that if it does contribute vibrio that it is cooling and is an overhang is incorrect. sent5: if the croup contributes vibrio then the fact that it is not a kind of a cooling and it does overhang does not hold. sent6: the croup is not a cooling and is an overhang if it contributes vibrio. sent7: that something is a kind of non-bromic thing that is rabbinical is wrong if it overhangs. sent8: there exists something such that if it does contribute baiting then that it is orthopedics and it is centroidal is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__