both the non-photovoltaicness and the non-agonadalness occurs.
sent1: the photovoltaicness does not occur if the estrousness happens and the counterclaim occurs. sent2: the agonadalness does not occur. sent3: the imperfectness and the estrousness occurs. sent4: the photometry does not occur and the backhanding does not occur if the imperfectness happens. sent5: the counterclaiming occurs. sent6: the fact that the non-photovoltaicness and the non-agonadalness occurs is not right if the fact that the imperfectness does not occur is not false.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the estrousness occurs is right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: both the estrousness and the counterclaiming occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the photovoltaicness does not occur.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the photometry does not occur and the backhandness does not occur is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = both the non-photovoltaicness and the non-agonadalness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the photovoltaicness does not occur if the estrousness happens and the counterclaim occurs. sent2: the agonadalness does not occur. sent3: the imperfectness and the estrousness occurs. sent4: the photometry does not occur and the backhanding does not occur if the imperfectness happens. sent5: the counterclaiming occurs. sent6: the fact that the non-photovoltaicness and the non-agonadalness occurs is not right if the fact that the imperfectness does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the estrousness occurs is right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: both the estrousness and the counterclaiming occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the photovoltaicness does not occur.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__