the ciprofloxacin is a Rutledge.
sent1: if the hillside is not objective the ciprofloxacin is agricultural and smoky. sent2: the phytochemical is an objective. sent3: the hillside does not multiply Matthew. sent4: the hillside is smoky. sent5: the ciprofloxacin is not smoky if it is not an objective. sent6: if that the Fry is uncreative or it is not smoky or both is not right that the crud is not smoky is right. sent7: the fact that the ciprofloxacin is an objective is not wrong if it is smoky. sent8: that the Fry is uncreative and/or non-smoky is not correct if the muezzin is a Haematopodidae. sent9: the hillside is unseasonable. sent10: something is agricultural but it is not unseasonable if it is not smoky. sent11: the hillside is an angle. sent12: if that the hillside is not agricultural hold then the oxidant is not agricultural. sent13: the ciprofloxacin is a eunuchoidism. sent14: if the anticonvulsant is unseasonable the hillside is both a leak and non-objective. sent15: if the crud is agricultural and is not unseasonable the anticonvulsant is unseasonable. sent16: if something is not a leak it is not a kind of a Rutledge. sent17: if the ciprofloxacin is smoky then it is a kind of a Rutledge. sent18: the hillside is not a kind of an objective if the fact that it is not agricultural is correct. sent19: the ciprofloxacin is not a leak if the hillside is a leak but it is not objective. sent20: the tri-iodothyronine is a paint and is a kind of a Rutledge.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hillside is both a leak and not unseasonable.; assump1 -> int1: the hillside is not unseasonable.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that that the hillside is a leak but it is not unseasonable is not incorrect is not correct.;
the oxidant is non-agricultural.
$hypothesis$ = the ciprofloxacin is a Rutledge. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hillside is not objective the ciprofloxacin is agricultural and smoky. sent2: the phytochemical is an objective. sent3: the hillside does not multiply Matthew. sent4: the hillside is smoky. sent5: the ciprofloxacin is not smoky if it is not an objective. sent6: if that the Fry is uncreative or it is not smoky or both is not right that the crud is not smoky is right. sent7: the fact that the ciprofloxacin is an objective is not wrong if it is smoky. sent8: that the Fry is uncreative and/or non-smoky is not correct if the muezzin is a Haematopodidae. sent9: the hillside is unseasonable. sent10: something is agricultural but it is not unseasonable if it is not smoky. sent11: the hillside is an angle. sent12: if that the hillside is not agricultural hold then the oxidant is not agricultural. sent13: the ciprofloxacin is a eunuchoidism. sent14: if the anticonvulsant is unseasonable the hillside is both a leak and non-objective. sent15: if the crud is agricultural and is not unseasonable the anticonvulsant is unseasonable. sent16: if something is not a leak it is not a kind of a Rutledge. sent17: if the ciprofloxacin is smoky then it is a kind of a Rutledge. sent18: the hillside is not a kind of an objective if the fact that it is not agricultural is correct. sent19: the ciprofloxacin is not a leak if the hillside is a leak but it is not objective. sent20: the tri-iodothyronine is a paint and is a kind of a Rutledge. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hillside is both a leak and not unseasonable.; assump1 -> int1: the hillside is not unseasonable.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that that the hillside is a leak but it is not unseasonable is not incorrect is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__