the cooler is not a kibble.
sent1: if the chickeree is resistless the cooler aches. sent2: if the kerion is resistless the cooler either is not a kibble or does ache or both. sent3: something is a dustpan and dactylic if it is not a kind of a looseness. sent4: if something is a dustpan that it is both not resistless and not non-shambolic is wrong. sent5: the Ichyostega is not a kind of a kibble. sent6: if something is not a kind of a dustpan the fact that it aches and/or it is resistless is not true. sent7: the kerion is non-masculine and amphoteric. sent8: something that is an aching is a kibble. sent9: the chickeree is not amphoteric. sent10: if that either something is a vaquero or it is commercial or both is false then it is not a looseness. sent11: the kerion is amphoteric. sent12: the endemic is amphoteric. sent13: if the chickeree does ache then it is resistless. sent14: if the kerion is not a masculine but it is not non-amphoteric then the chickeree is resistless. sent15: if the kerion is a kind of a magneton then it is a branched. sent16: the kerion is non-resistless thing that is amphoteric. sent17: the kerion is masculine if the chickeree is not resistless but amphoteric. sent18: there is nothing such that it is a vaquero and/or it is a kind of a commercial.
sent14 & sent7 -> int1: the chickeree is resistless.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the cooler does ache.; sent8 -> int3: the cooler is a kibble if it is an aching.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the cooler is not a kibble.
sent3 -> int4: if the chickeree is not a kind of a looseness then it is a kind of a dustpan and it is dactylic.; sent10 -> int5: the glutamine is not a looseness if the fact that either it is a vaquero or it is a commercial or both is incorrect.; sent18 -> int6: that the glutamine is a vaquero and/or it is a kind of a commercial does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the glutamine is not a looseness.; int7 -> int8: everything is not a looseness.; int8 -> int9: the chickeree is not a looseness.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the chickeree is a dustpan and it is dactylic.; int10 -> int11: everything is a dustpan and it is dactylic.; int11 -> int12: the kerion is a dustpan and is dactylic.; int12 -> int13: the kerion is a kind of a dustpan.; sent4 -> int14: if the kerion is a kind of a dustpan then that it is not resistless and is shambolic is not right.; int13 & int14 -> int15: that the kerion is a kind of non-resistless thing that is shambolic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the cooler is not a kibble. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chickeree is resistless the cooler aches. sent2: if the kerion is resistless the cooler either is not a kibble or does ache or both. sent3: something is a dustpan and dactylic if it is not a kind of a looseness. sent4: if something is a dustpan that it is both not resistless and not non-shambolic is wrong. sent5: the Ichyostega is not a kind of a kibble. sent6: if something is not a kind of a dustpan the fact that it aches and/or it is resistless is not true. sent7: the kerion is non-masculine and amphoteric. sent8: something that is an aching is a kibble. sent9: the chickeree is not amphoteric. sent10: if that either something is a vaquero or it is commercial or both is false then it is not a looseness. sent11: the kerion is amphoteric. sent12: the endemic is amphoteric. sent13: if the chickeree does ache then it is resistless. sent14: if the kerion is not a masculine but it is not non-amphoteric then the chickeree is resistless. sent15: if the kerion is a kind of a magneton then it is a branched. sent16: the kerion is non-resistless thing that is amphoteric. sent17: the kerion is masculine if the chickeree is not resistless but amphoteric. sent18: there is nothing such that it is a vaquero and/or it is a kind of a commercial. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent7 -> int1: the chickeree is resistless.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the cooler does ache.; sent8 -> int3: the cooler is a kibble if it is an aching.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__