the console secures.
sent1: the conglomerate does outstare disloyalty. sent2: if the double-crosser is both not bicylindrical and not a Malamud then the conglomerate is not bicylindrical. sent3: The disloyalty does outstare conglomerate. sent4: that the console is a horseleech and does not transmit does not hold if the turner is a carotene. sent5: something does not surmise console if that it does restrain Prionace and is not centigrade is not correct. sent6: the fact that something is malicious hold if it does bracket. sent7: the console either brackets or outstares disloyalty or both if there is something such that it outstares kumquat. sent8: if the fact that something transmits but it is not a horseleech is not correct that it is not a carotene is not wrong. sent9: if the fact that either the conglomerate is not a pastness or it does not outstare soupfin or both is not correct it does outstare kumquat. sent10: that that the carbohydrate is not foreleg but it is a rebellion is false is correct. sent11: if something is not bicylindrical then the fact that it is not a kind of a pastness and/or it does not outstare soupfin is wrong. sent12: if the conglomerate does outstare disloyalty then the fact that that the turner transmits and is not a horseleech is wrong hold. sent13: if that the carbohydrate is both non-foreleg and a rebellion does not hold the double-crosser is brassy. sent14: the fact that something is not a carotene but it secures does not hold if it is malicious. sent15: something secures if it is both not malicious and a carotene. sent16: the console is a kind of non-malicious a carotene if the fact that the turner is not a kind of a carotene hold. sent17: if the double-crosser is brassy it is both not bicylindrical and not a Malamud.
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the turner transmits but it is not a kind of a horseleech is not correct then it is not a kind of a carotene.; sent12 & sent1 -> int2: that that the turner does transmit and is not a kind of a horseleech is not wrong does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the turner is not a kind of a carotene.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: that the console is not malicious but it is a kind of a carotene is right.; sent15 -> int5: if the console is not malicious and is a carotene it is secure.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the kumquat does not surmise console if that it restrains Prionace and it is not centigrade does not hold.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the console secures. ; $context$ = sent1: the conglomerate does outstare disloyalty. sent2: if the double-crosser is both not bicylindrical and not a Malamud then the conglomerate is not bicylindrical. sent3: The disloyalty does outstare conglomerate. sent4: that the console is a horseleech and does not transmit does not hold if the turner is a carotene. sent5: something does not surmise console if that it does restrain Prionace and is not centigrade is not correct. sent6: the fact that something is malicious hold if it does bracket. sent7: the console either brackets or outstares disloyalty or both if there is something such that it outstares kumquat. sent8: if the fact that something transmits but it is not a horseleech is not correct that it is not a carotene is not wrong. sent9: if the fact that either the conglomerate is not a pastness or it does not outstare soupfin or both is not correct it does outstare kumquat. sent10: that that the carbohydrate is not foreleg but it is a rebellion is false is correct. sent11: if something is not bicylindrical then the fact that it is not a kind of a pastness and/or it does not outstare soupfin is wrong. sent12: if the conglomerate does outstare disloyalty then the fact that that the turner transmits and is not a horseleech is wrong hold. sent13: if that the carbohydrate is both non-foreleg and a rebellion does not hold the double-crosser is brassy. sent14: the fact that something is not a carotene but it secures does not hold if it is malicious. sent15: something secures if it is both not malicious and a carotene. sent16: the console is a kind of non-malicious a carotene if the fact that the turner is not a kind of a carotene hold. sent17: if the double-crosser is brassy it is both not bicylindrical and not a Malamud. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the turner transmits but it is not a kind of a horseleech is not correct then it is not a kind of a carotene.; sent12 & sent1 -> int2: that that the turner does transmit and is not a kind of a horseleech is not wrong does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the turner is not a kind of a carotene.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: that the console is not malicious but it is a kind of a carotene is right.; sent15 -> int5: if the console is not malicious and is a carotene it is secure.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__