that there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a boodle and does not own adjudication is wrong then it is incorrect is right.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a boodle and does not own adjudication then it does not correct. sent2: the tramway corrects if the fact that it is a boodle and it does not own adjudication does not hold. sent3: the tramway is non-dysgenics if the fact that it does own adjudication and does not own cloistered does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a matronymic and it is not brunet is not right then it is neuralgic. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a blush it is not baboonish. sent6: if something does own adjudication the fact that it is not correct is not incorrect. sent7: that if the fact that something is a boodle but it does not own adjudication is wrong it is correct is correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a monoxide that does not canvass it is not obstetrics. sent9: the virologist is not politic if it owns tracheostomy and does not riposte piolet. sent10: if the tramway is a boodle and does not own adjudication then it is not correct. sent11: if the tramway owns adjudication it does not correct. sent12: something is not a banter if the fact that it is rustless and it is not a masculine is incorrect. sent13: if something is a Citlaltepetl it is not a brunet. sent14: if that something is a moonflower but it is not a kind of a isometric does not hold then that it is Lao is right. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it does own adjudication hold then the fact that it is not correct is true.
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a boodle and does not own adjudication is wrong then it is incorrect is right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a boodle and does not own adjudication then it does not correct. sent2: the tramway corrects if the fact that it is a boodle and it does not own adjudication does not hold. sent3: the tramway is non-dysgenics if the fact that it does own adjudication and does not own cloistered does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a matronymic and it is not brunet is not right then it is neuralgic. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a blush it is not baboonish. sent6: if something does own adjudication the fact that it is not correct is not incorrect. sent7: that if the fact that something is a boodle but it does not own adjudication is wrong it is correct is correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a monoxide that does not canvass it is not obstetrics. sent9: the virologist is not politic if it owns tracheostomy and does not riposte piolet. sent10: if the tramway is a boodle and does not own adjudication then it is not correct. sent11: if the tramway owns adjudication it does not correct. sent12: something is not a banter if the fact that it is rustless and it is not a masculine is incorrect. sent13: if something is a Citlaltepetl it is not a brunet. sent14: if that something is a moonflower but it is not a kind of a isometric does not hold then that it is Lao is right. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it does own adjudication hold then the fact that it is not correct is true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__