that the spraying Dracunculidae does not occur is caused by that the communicating deamination happens and the dodge happens.
sent1: if that the priorship does not occur and the restfulness does not occur is incorrect the misgovernment does not occur. sent2: if the normotensiveness occurs the fossilization happens and the spraying Dracunculidae does not occur. sent3: that the dodge does not occur brings about that both the dooming and the communicating deamination occurs. sent4: that the fossilization but not the spraying Dracunculidae happens prevents that the dodging happens. sent5: the normotensiveness happens if the misgovernment does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the communicating deamination and the dodging happens.; assump1 -> int1: the dodging occurs.; int1 -> int2: the fossilization and/or the dodge occurs.;
the nonconformity occurs and/or the dooming happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the spraying Dracunculidae does not occur is caused by that the communicating deamination happens and the dodge happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the priorship does not occur and the restfulness does not occur is incorrect the misgovernment does not occur. sent2: if the normotensiveness occurs the fossilization happens and the spraying Dracunculidae does not occur. sent3: that the dodge does not occur brings about that both the dooming and the communicating deamination occurs. sent4: that the fossilization but not the spraying Dracunculidae happens prevents that the dodging happens. sent5: the normotensiveness happens if the misgovernment does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the communicating deamination and the dodging happens.; assump1 -> int1: the dodging occurs.; int1 -> int2: the fossilization and/or the dodge occurs.; __UNKNOWN__