the fact that the Quiche is both a broadtail and a antibaryon is incorrect.
sent1: if the satchel is not a puddingwife and/or it is a racing the storminess is not a kind of a puddingwife. sent2: the fact that the Quiche is a kind of a broadtail that is a kind of a antibaryon is not true if the reception is not a broadtail. sent3: the reception is not a puddingwife. sent4: something is not a Seanad and/or does stuff Standish if it is unsent. sent5: if the Quiche is not sarcastic then the reception is a sage. sent6: the Sabbatarian does scissor if that it does not stuff Standish and it is not unsent is not right. sent7: if that something does not scissor and does jiggle Sudbury is not right then it is not a broadtail. sent8: if the Sabbatarian is an umpire the fact that it is unsent is not incorrect. sent9: if there is something such that it is unsent and does not stuff Standish the Quiche is a broadtail. sent10: something does scissor if it either is not a kind of a Seanad or does stuff Standish or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a puddingwife that the Sabbatarian is both not an umpire and not a pinecone is not true. sent12: the rectification is a antibaryon if the storminess is a pinecone. sent13: the satchel is not unsent if the storminess does not stuff Standish. sent14: the satchel is unsent if the Sabbatarian is unsent. sent15: if that the Sabbatarian is not a kind of an umpire and is not a pinecone is incorrect it is unsent. sent16: the Quiche does not belay. sent17: the fact that the Sabbatarian is a kind of an umpire and is not a pinecone does not hold if something is a puddingwife. sent18: the fact that the fact that the lower jiggles Sudbury but it is not a broadtail is wrong is not wrong if something is a antibaryon. sent19: something is a tanker and/or it is not sarcastic if it is not a belay. sent20: something is a Seanad but it does not scissor if that it is not a pinecone is true. sent21: the fact that the reception does not scissor and does jiggle Sudbury is false if the fact that the rectification does not scissor is not false. sent22: if the rectification jiggles Sudbury that it is unsent thing that does not stuff Standish hold. sent23: there is something such that it is a kind of a puddingwife. sent24: the reception is a kind of a sage if the fact that the Quiche is a tanker is not false. sent25: the fact that the reception scissors and it jiggles Sudbury is wrong. sent26: the storminess does not stuff Standish if the rectification is a kind of a Seanad and it scissors. sent27: the rectification is a Seanad. sent28: if the reception is a sage that is not a puddingwife the satchel is not a puddingwife.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rectification scissors.; sent27 & assump1 -> int1: the rectification is a kind of a Seanad that does scissor.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the storminess does not stuff Standish.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the satchel is not unsent.; sent23 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the Sabbatarian is not an umpire and is not a pinecone does not hold.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the Sabbatarian is unsent.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the satchel is unsent.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the rectification does not scissor.; int8 & sent21 -> int9: that the reception does not scissor and jiggles Sudbury is not true.; sent7 -> int10: that the reception is not a broadtail is correct if the fact that it does not scissor and it jiggles Sudbury is incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the reception is not a broadtail.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the Quiche is a broadtail and it is a kind of a antibaryon.
sent20 -> int12: the fact that the storminess is the Seanad but it does not scissor if the storminess is not a pinecone is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Quiche is both a broadtail and a antibaryon is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the satchel is not a puddingwife and/or it is a racing the storminess is not a kind of a puddingwife. sent2: the fact that the Quiche is a kind of a broadtail that is a kind of a antibaryon is not true if the reception is not a broadtail. sent3: the reception is not a puddingwife. sent4: something is not a Seanad and/or does stuff Standish if it is unsent. sent5: if the Quiche is not sarcastic then the reception is a sage. sent6: the Sabbatarian does scissor if that it does not stuff Standish and it is not unsent is not right. sent7: if that something does not scissor and does jiggle Sudbury is not right then it is not a broadtail. sent8: if the Sabbatarian is an umpire the fact that it is unsent is not incorrect. sent9: if there is something such that it is unsent and does not stuff Standish the Quiche is a broadtail. sent10: something does scissor if it either is not a kind of a Seanad or does stuff Standish or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a puddingwife that the Sabbatarian is both not an umpire and not a pinecone is not true. sent12: the rectification is a antibaryon if the storminess is a pinecone. sent13: the satchel is not unsent if the storminess does not stuff Standish. sent14: the satchel is unsent if the Sabbatarian is unsent. sent15: if that the Sabbatarian is not a kind of an umpire and is not a pinecone is incorrect it is unsent. sent16: the Quiche does not belay. sent17: the fact that the Sabbatarian is a kind of an umpire and is not a pinecone does not hold if something is a puddingwife. sent18: the fact that the fact that the lower jiggles Sudbury but it is not a broadtail is wrong is not wrong if something is a antibaryon. sent19: something is a tanker and/or it is not sarcastic if it is not a belay. sent20: something is a Seanad but it does not scissor if that it is not a pinecone is true. sent21: the fact that the reception does not scissor and does jiggle Sudbury is false if the fact that the rectification does not scissor is not false. sent22: if the rectification jiggles Sudbury that it is unsent thing that does not stuff Standish hold. sent23: there is something such that it is a kind of a puddingwife. sent24: the reception is a kind of a sage if the fact that the Quiche is a tanker is not false. sent25: the fact that the reception scissors and it jiggles Sudbury is wrong. sent26: the storminess does not stuff Standish if the rectification is a kind of a Seanad and it scissors. sent27: the rectification is a Seanad. sent28: if the reception is a sage that is not a puddingwife the satchel is not a puddingwife. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rectification scissors.; sent27 & assump1 -> int1: the rectification is a kind of a Seanad that does scissor.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the storminess does not stuff Standish.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the satchel is not unsent.; sent23 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the Sabbatarian is not an umpire and is not a pinecone does not hold.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the Sabbatarian is unsent.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the satchel is unsent.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the rectification does not scissor.; int8 & sent21 -> int9: that the reception does not scissor and jiggles Sudbury is not true.; sent7 -> int10: that the reception is not a broadtail is correct if the fact that it does not scissor and it jiggles Sudbury is incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the reception is not a broadtail.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__