the fact that there is something such that if it is topological then it is a kind of chancrous thing that does not quintuple pouter does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is topological then it is a kind of chancrous thing that does quintuple pouter. sent2: the settee is topological but it is not unguiculate if it is a kind of a plenty. sent3: something that does shoplift is a communist and not an alkene. sent4: if something is topological then it is chancrous and it does not quintuple pouter. sent5: there is something such that if it is topological then it does not quintuple pouter. sent6: that if the oxbow is cordless the oxbow is chancrous but it is not roentgenographic is correct. sent7: if the pouter is a fortuitousness it scours wrinkled and is not chancrous. sent8: the settee does not quintuple pouter if it is topological. sent9: the settee is a bullpen but it does not impart if it quintuples pouter. sent10: there is something such that if it is topological then it is chancrous. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a nomia then it is hidrotic and it is not an alignment. sent12: the settee is adnexal but it is not intertidal if it is topological. sent13: there is something such that if it is a Paranthropus it is a kind of chronic thing that is not a hackee.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the settee is chancrous but it does not quintuple pouter is not false if it is topological.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is topological then it is a kind of chancrous thing that does not quintuple pouter does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is topological then it is a kind of chancrous thing that does quintuple pouter. sent2: the settee is topological but it is not unguiculate if it is a kind of a plenty. sent3: something that does shoplift is a communist and not an alkene. sent4: if something is topological then it is chancrous and it does not quintuple pouter. sent5: there is something such that if it is topological then it does not quintuple pouter. sent6: that if the oxbow is cordless the oxbow is chancrous but it is not roentgenographic is correct. sent7: if the pouter is a fortuitousness it scours wrinkled and is not chancrous. sent8: the settee does not quintuple pouter if it is topological. sent9: the settee is a bullpen but it does not impart if it quintuples pouter. sent10: there is something such that if it is topological then it is chancrous. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a nomia then it is hidrotic and it is not an alignment. sent12: the settee is adnexal but it is not intertidal if it is topological. sent13: there is something such that if it is a Paranthropus it is a kind of chronic thing that is not a hackee. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the settee is chancrous but it does not quintuple pouter is not false if it is topological.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__