the fact that that the preemption does not occur or the grouping subjectivist does not occur or both is triggered by that the simulating does not occur is wrong.
sent1: that the simulating occurs brings about that the preemption does not occur and/or that the grouping subjectivist does not occur. sent2: the grouping gentian does not occur. sent3: the preemption does not occur if the simulating does not occur. sent4: the enrichment does not occur and/or the sights does not occur. sent5: if the multiculturalness does not occur then the fact that the overturning Jeth does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the simulating does not occur is not incorrect.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the preemption does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the preemption does not occur and/or the grouping subjectivist does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the preemption does not occur or the grouping subjectivist does not occur or both is triggered by that the simulating does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the simulating occurs brings about that the preemption does not occur and/or that the grouping subjectivist does not occur. sent2: the grouping gentian does not occur. sent3: the preemption does not occur if the simulating does not occur. sent4: the enrichment does not occur and/or the sights does not occur. sent5: if the multiculturalness does not occur then the fact that the overturning Jeth does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the simulating does not occur is not incorrect.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the preemption does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the preemption does not occur and/or the grouping subjectivist does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__