the fact that the surfperch is a tribadism but it is not a peck is wrong.
sent1: that the surfperch is a kind of a tribadism but it is not a peck is not right if the Neosporin is not positivist. sent2: that something does warble and it does service elucidation is not true if it is not sensorineural. sent3: the totem does service elucidation. sent4: the extreme is a kind of a hoister if the totem does warble. sent5: something is not sensorineural if it is a kind of a positivist. sent6: the extreme is a kind of a cut. sent7: if the cascade is not a kind of a wireless the extreme is a cut and it is sensorineural. sent8: that the surfperch is not a peck is true if the totem is not a peck. sent9: the totem is a kind of a warble that does service elucidation. sent10: the totem is a positivist and it is a tribadism if it is not a peck. sent11: the totem does service elucidation and it is sensorineural. sent12: the fact that the Neosporin is a positivist and/or it is not a wireless is not right if it is cut. sent13: the cascade is not a wireless. sent14: the Neosporin is not positivist if the extreme is a hoister and is not non-sensorineural. sent15: if the cascade is not a kind of a wireless the extreme is cut. sent16: if the extreme is a kind of a positivist it services elucidation. sent17: the surfperch is a kind of a tribadism that is a kind of a warble if there exists something such that it services elucidation. sent18: the fact that the cascade is a tribadism and is non-wireless is not correct. sent19: the extreme is a positivist if that either the Neosporin is a kind of a positivist or it is not wireless or both does not hold.
sent9 -> int1: the totem does warble.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the extreme is a kind of a hoister.; sent7 & sent13 -> int3: the extreme is cut and it is sensorineural.; int3 -> int4: the extreme is sensorineural.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the extreme is a hoister and it is sensorineural.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the Neosporin is not a kind of a positivist.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the Ritz is not a kind of a hoister.
sent2 -> int7: if that the totem is not sensorineural is not wrong then the fact that it is a warble and it does service elucidation is incorrect.; sent5 -> int8: if the totem is a positivist the fact that it is not sensorineural is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the surfperch is a tribadism but it is not a peck is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the surfperch is a kind of a tribadism but it is not a peck is not right if the Neosporin is not positivist. sent2: that something does warble and it does service elucidation is not true if it is not sensorineural. sent3: the totem does service elucidation. sent4: the extreme is a kind of a hoister if the totem does warble. sent5: something is not sensorineural if it is a kind of a positivist. sent6: the extreme is a kind of a cut. sent7: if the cascade is not a kind of a wireless the extreme is a cut and it is sensorineural. sent8: that the surfperch is not a peck is true if the totem is not a peck. sent9: the totem is a kind of a warble that does service elucidation. sent10: the totem is a positivist and it is a tribadism if it is not a peck. sent11: the totem does service elucidation and it is sensorineural. sent12: the fact that the Neosporin is a positivist and/or it is not a wireless is not right if it is cut. sent13: the cascade is not a wireless. sent14: the Neosporin is not positivist if the extreme is a hoister and is not non-sensorineural. sent15: if the cascade is not a kind of a wireless the extreme is cut. sent16: if the extreme is a kind of a positivist it services elucidation. sent17: the surfperch is a kind of a tribadism that is a kind of a warble if there exists something such that it services elucidation. sent18: the fact that the cascade is a tribadism and is non-wireless is not correct. sent19: the extreme is a positivist if that either the Neosporin is a kind of a positivist or it is not wireless or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the totem does warble.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the extreme is a kind of a hoister.; sent7 & sent13 -> int3: the extreme is cut and it is sensorineural.; int3 -> int4: the extreme is sensorineural.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the extreme is a hoister and it is sensorineural.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the Neosporin is not a kind of a positivist.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__