the fact that that the cryptocoryne does not manhandle calculator or does not disobey or both does not hold is not incorrect.
sent1: that either the cryptocoryne does not manhandle calculator or it does not disobey or both is wrong if the armor does not behoove. sent2: the armor does not behoove if the bialy is a Oto. sent3: the fact that the kernel does not add officiation and does severalize technophilia is wrong. sent4: the kernel is not a Oxonian. sent5: if something is a kind of a Oto that manhandles calculator then the bialy is meiotic. sent6: if something that is not a Oxonian does add officiation then it is not meiotic. sent7: the Americanization is not Oxonian if that it is a Oxonian that does not morph is false. sent8: if the Americanization is a Oxonian then that it is not meiotic and does not add officiation is not true. sent9: that the cryptocoryne is a kind of a Oto is not incorrect if the armor does behoove. sent10: the Americanization is a Oxonian if the kernel is not a kind of a Oxonian. sent11: the armor behooves. sent12: the bialy is not meiotic if the fact that the Americanization is not meiotic and it does not add officiation does not hold. sent13: the armor does add officiation. sent14: that either the bialy is a Oto or it does behoove or both if there are non-meiotic things hold. sent15: the fact that something is a Oxonian but it does not morph is wrong if it is an entrepreneur.
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the cryptocoryne is a Oto hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cryptocoryne manhandles calculator.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cryptocoryne is a Oto that manhandles calculator.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a Oto and does manhandle calculator.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the bialy is meiotic is not false.; sent10 & sent4 -> int5: the Americanization is a Oxonian.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the Americanization is not meiotic and does not add officiation does not hold is not incorrect.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the bialy is not meiotic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the cryptocoryne does not manhandle calculator.; int9 -> hypothesis;
that the cryptocoryne does not manhandle calculator and/or it does not disobey is not correct.
sent6 -> int10: if the Americanization is a kind of non-Oxonian thing that adds officiation then it is not meiotic.; sent15 -> int11: the fact that the Americanization is a Oxonian but it does not morph does not hold if it is a kind of an entrepreneur.; sent3 -> int12: there exists something such that that it does not add officiation and does severalize technophilia is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the cryptocoryne does not manhandle calculator or does not disobey or both does not hold is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that either the cryptocoryne does not manhandle calculator or it does not disobey or both is wrong if the armor does not behoove. sent2: the armor does not behoove if the bialy is a Oto. sent3: the fact that the kernel does not add officiation and does severalize technophilia is wrong. sent4: the kernel is not a Oxonian. sent5: if something is a kind of a Oto that manhandles calculator then the bialy is meiotic. sent6: if something that is not a Oxonian does add officiation then it is not meiotic. sent7: the Americanization is not Oxonian if that it is a Oxonian that does not morph is false. sent8: if the Americanization is a Oxonian then that it is not meiotic and does not add officiation is not true. sent9: that the cryptocoryne is a kind of a Oto is not incorrect if the armor does behoove. sent10: the Americanization is a Oxonian if the kernel is not a kind of a Oxonian. sent11: the armor behooves. sent12: the bialy is not meiotic if the fact that the Americanization is not meiotic and it does not add officiation does not hold. sent13: the armor does add officiation. sent14: that either the bialy is a Oto or it does behoove or both if there are non-meiotic things hold. sent15: the fact that something is a Oxonian but it does not morph is wrong if it is an entrepreneur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the cryptocoryne is a Oto hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cryptocoryne manhandles calculator.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cryptocoryne is a Oto that manhandles calculator.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a Oto and does manhandle calculator.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the bialy is meiotic is not false.; sent10 & sent4 -> int5: the Americanization is a Oxonian.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the Americanization is not meiotic and does not add officiation does not hold is not incorrect.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the bialy is not meiotic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the cryptocoryne does not manhandle calculator.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__