the fact that the napoleon is not unethical and/or it is non-colorimetric is incorrect.
sent1: if the emcee is genic then that it does gyrate hold. sent2: something is ethical if it is a Union. sent3: if something does not cloy laughing and/or it does not approbate scroll the sprig is not Sisyphean. sent4: if the sprig is colorimetric then the napoleon is not ethical. sent5: if something approbates aftertaste that it does not depose Botaurus and it does not gyrate is false. sent6: if the emcee is therapeutic then it deposes Botaurus. sent7: the napoleon is a Union if the fact that the dichromat does not depose Botaurus and it does not gyrate is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that something is a kind of Sisyphean thing that is guilty is not correct it is not Sisyphean. sent9: the minesweeper is genic. sent10: if an injectable thing is a kind of a scattering then it does not cloy bubo. sent11: the emcee is genic and zymoid if the dichromat is not a Union. sent12: the fact that the napoleon is ethical and/or it is not colorimetric is wrong if the sprig is colorimetric. sent13: if something that gyrates does depose Botaurus then that it does not approbate aftertaste hold. sent14: if the fact that the emcee does not approbate aftertaste hold then the sprig is non-Sisyphean thing that is colorimetric. sent15: that the sprig is not Sisyphean hold. sent16: if something is not Sisyphean then the fact that the emcee is Sisyphean and it is guilty is not right. sent17: there is something such that it does not cloy laughing or it does not approbate scroll or both. sent18: the sprig does not cloy laughing if the fact that the emcee is not Sisyphean is right. sent19: something does depose Botaurus if it cloys laughing. sent20: if the emcee is not Sisyphean the fact that it does not approbate aftertaste and is therapeutic is not true. sent21: the dichromat is not Union. sent22: the emcee is therapeutic and/or it does cloy laughing.
sent11 & sent21 -> int1: the emcee is genic and it is zymoid.; int1 -> int2: the emcee is genic.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the emcee does gyrate.; sent19 -> int4: the fact that the emcee deposes Botaurus is not wrong if that it cloys laughing is not incorrect.; sent22 & sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the emcee deposes Botaurus is right.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the emcee gyrates and it deposes Botaurus.; sent13 -> int7: the emcee does not approbate aftertaste if the fact that it does gyrate and it does depose Botaurus is true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the emcee does not approbate aftertaste.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the sprig is not Sisyphean and is colorimetric.; int9 -> int10: the sprig is colorimetric.; int10 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
if the malamute is injectable and it is a kind of a scattering it does not cloy bubo.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the napoleon is not unethical and/or it is non-colorimetric is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the emcee is genic then that it does gyrate hold. sent2: something is ethical if it is a Union. sent3: if something does not cloy laughing and/or it does not approbate scroll the sprig is not Sisyphean. sent4: if the sprig is colorimetric then the napoleon is not ethical. sent5: if something approbates aftertaste that it does not depose Botaurus and it does not gyrate is false. sent6: if the emcee is therapeutic then it deposes Botaurus. sent7: the napoleon is a Union if the fact that the dichromat does not depose Botaurus and it does not gyrate is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that something is a kind of Sisyphean thing that is guilty is not correct it is not Sisyphean. sent9: the minesweeper is genic. sent10: if an injectable thing is a kind of a scattering then it does not cloy bubo. sent11: the emcee is genic and zymoid if the dichromat is not a Union. sent12: the fact that the napoleon is ethical and/or it is not colorimetric is wrong if the sprig is colorimetric. sent13: if something that gyrates does depose Botaurus then that it does not approbate aftertaste hold. sent14: if the fact that the emcee does not approbate aftertaste hold then the sprig is non-Sisyphean thing that is colorimetric. sent15: that the sprig is not Sisyphean hold. sent16: if something is not Sisyphean then the fact that the emcee is Sisyphean and it is guilty is not right. sent17: there is something such that it does not cloy laughing or it does not approbate scroll or both. sent18: the sprig does not cloy laughing if the fact that the emcee is not Sisyphean is right. sent19: something does depose Botaurus if it cloys laughing. sent20: if the emcee is not Sisyphean the fact that it does not approbate aftertaste and is therapeutic is not true. sent21: the dichromat is not Union. sent22: the emcee is therapeutic and/or it does cloy laughing. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent21 -> int1: the emcee is genic and it is zymoid.; int1 -> int2: the emcee is genic.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the emcee does gyrate.; sent19 -> int4: the fact that the emcee deposes Botaurus is not wrong if that it cloys laughing is not incorrect.; sent22 & sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the emcee deposes Botaurus is right.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the emcee gyrates and it deposes Botaurus.; sent13 -> int7: the emcee does not approbate aftertaste if the fact that it does gyrate and it does depose Botaurus is true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the emcee does not approbate aftertaste.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the sprig is not Sisyphean and is colorimetric.; int9 -> int10: the sprig is colorimetric.; int10 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__