that the slum is a helmsman but it does not mulct legalism is not correct.
sent1: if something does not homologize then that it is a helmsman and it does not mulct legalism is false. sent2: there exists nothing such that it is not a helmsman and it does not catapult spur. sent3: if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-phrenic thing that is not a orpine the monocle is an agency. sent4: that the slum is a kind of a helmsman and it mulcts legalism is not true. sent5: the hipbone is not a kind of a orpine if the drum is an agency. sent6: the monocle is morphemic. sent7: that the slum is a kind of a orpine and is phrenic is wrong if the hipbone is not a orpine. sent8: the hipbone is a kind of a helmsman if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a helmsman and it does not catapult spur does not hold. sent9: if the fact that something is a orpine and it is phrenic does not hold it does not homologize. sent10: that the slum is a helmsman and it does mulct legalism is not correct if it does not homologize. sent11: that the keratin is morphemic and a cartilaginification is incorrect if the fact that something is an agency is correct. sent12: the drum is a kind of non-phrenic thing that is not a orpine if the hipbone is a helmsman. sent13: if a morphemic thing is a kind of a cartilaginification then the drum is an agency.
sent9 -> int1: that the slum does not homologize hold if the fact that it is a orpine that is phrenic is wrong.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the slum is a helmsman but it does not mulct legalism is wrong if it does not homologize.;
that the keratin does not homologize is correct.
sent2 -> int3: that the fact that the slum is not a kind of a helmsman and does not catapult spur does not hold hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a helmsman and it does not catapult spur is not right.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the hipbone is a helmsman.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the drum is not phrenic and is not a kind of a orpine.; int6 -> int7: something is not phrenic and it is not a kind of a orpine.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the monocle is an agency.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is an agency.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: that the keratin is morphemic and it is a cartilaginification is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the slum is a helmsman but it does not mulct legalism is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not homologize then that it is a helmsman and it does not mulct legalism is false. sent2: there exists nothing such that it is not a helmsman and it does not catapult spur. sent3: if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-phrenic thing that is not a orpine the monocle is an agency. sent4: that the slum is a kind of a helmsman and it mulcts legalism is not true. sent5: the hipbone is not a kind of a orpine if the drum is an agency. sent6: the monocle is morphemic. sent7: that the slum is a kind of a orpine and is phrenic is wrong if the hipbone is not a orpine. sent8: the hipbone is a kind of a helmsman if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a helmsman and it does not catapult spur does not hold. sent9: if the fact that something is a orpine and it is phrenic does not hold it does not homologize. sent10: that the slum is a helmsman and it does mulct legalism is not correct if it does not homologize. sent11: that the keratin is morphemic and a cartilaginification is incorrect if the fact that something is an agency is correct. sent12: the drum is a kind of non-phrenic thing that is not a orpine if the hipbone is a helmsman. sent13: if a morphemic thing is a kind of a cartilaginification then the drum is an agency. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the slum does not homologize hold if the fact that it is a orpine that is phrenic is wrong.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the slum is a helmsman but it does not mulct legalism is wrong if it does not homologize.; __UNKNOWN__