the linchpin does command pitching.
sent1: the cynodont is not a kind of a stuffiness. sent2: the absinth is not a vetch if the sinker is acarpelous. sent3: the see does risk bareboating if the fact that the sponger is a kind of a Morristown that does not risk bareboating is not right. sent4: the spectacles is acronymic but it is not a vetch if the absinth is not a vetch. sent5: the fact that the sinker does not command pitching is not false if the absinth does not command pitching and is not a containership. sent6: the cynodont is resolute but not prepositional if the see risks bareboating. sent7: the awl does command pitching and is not thermostatics if the linchpin is not thermostatics. sent8: that the fact that the see is a kind of a containership and risks bareboating is correct is false. sent9: that the sponger is a Morristown and does not risk bareboating does not hold. sent10: if something is not prepositional the fact that it is a kind of a stuffiness that is a vetch is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the spectacles is not acronymic is right the sinker is acarpelous but it is not acronymic. sent12: the absinth is thermostatics. sent13: there is something such that it is not a hectoliter. sent14: there is something such that it does risk bareboating. sent15: something that is not non-acronymic and not a vetch is a kind of a stuffiness. sent16: something does command pitching if it is a vetch and it is not prepositional. sent17: if the absinth is not a vetch then the spectacles is not a vetch. sent18: the spectacles is prepositional if the cynodont is resolute but not prepositional. sent19: there is something such that it is acarpelous. sent20: the spectacles is prepositional if the cynodont is both resolute and prepositional. sent21: the linchpin is a containership and it commands pitching if there is something such that it is not thermostatics. sent22: if the sinker is not a kind of a stuffiness it is not a vetch. sent23: if the sinker does not command pitching and is not acronymic then that the linchpin does not command pitching is right. sent24: if there is something such that it is a stuffiness and it is prepositional then the awl is non-thermostatics. sent25: the absinth is not a vetch if the fact that the sinker is eugenics and is not acarpelous is not right. sent26: the absinth does not command pitching and is not a containership if it is thermostatics. sent27: that the sinker is resolute and it is eugenics is wrong.
sent15 -> int1: the spectacles is a stuffiness if it is both acronymic and not a vetch.; sent3 & sent9 -> int2: the see does risk bareboating.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the cynodont is resolute but it is not prepositional.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the spectacles is prepositional.;
the linchpin does not command pitching.
sent26 & sent12 -> int5: the absinth does not command pitching and it is not a containership.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the sinker does not command pitching.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that if the sinker is not prepositional then the fact that that the sinker is a stuffiness and it is a vetch is true does not hold is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the linchpin does command pitching. ; $context$ = sent1: the cynodont is not a kind of a stuffiness. sent2: the absinth is not a vetch if the sinker is acarpelous. sent3: the see does risk bareboating if the fact that the sponger is a kind of a Morristown that does not risk bareboating is not right. sent4: the spectacles is acronymic but it is not a vetch if the absinth is not a vetch. sent5: the fact that the sinker does not command pitching is not false if the absinth does not command pitching and is not a containership. sent6: the cynodont is resolute but not prepositional if the see risks bareboating. sent7: the awl does command pitching and is not thermostatics if the linchpin is not thermostatics. sent8: that the fact that the see is a kind of a containership and risks bareboating is correct is false. sent9: that the sponger is a Morristown and does not risk bareboating does not hold. sent10: if something is not prepositional the fact that it is a kind of a stuffiness that is a vetch is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the spectacles is not acronymic is right the sinker is acarpelous but it is not acronymic. sent12: the absinth is thermostatics. sent13: there is something such that it is not a hectoliter. sent14: there is something such that it does risk bareboating. sent15: something that is not non-acronymic and not a vetch is a kind of a stuffiness. sent16: something does command pitching if it is a vetch and it is not prepositional. sent17: if the absinth is not a vetch then the spectacles is not a vetch. sent18: the spectacles is prepositional if the cynodont is resolute but not prepositional. sent19: there is something such that it is acarpelous. sent20: the spectacles is prepositional if the cynodont is both resolute and prepositional. sent21: the linchpin is a containership and it commands pitching if there is something such that it is not thermostatics. sent22: if the sinker is not a kind of a stuffiness it is not a vetch. sent23: if the sinker does not command pitching and is not acronymic then that the linchpin does not command pitching is right. sent24: if there is something such that it is a stuffiness and it is prepositional then the awl is non-thermostatics. sent25: the absinth is not a vetch if the fact that the sinker is eugenics and is not acarpelous is not right. sent26: the absinth does not command pitching and is not a containership if it is thermostatics. sent27: that the sinker is resolute and it is eugenics is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the spectacles is a stuffiness if it is both acronymic and not a vetch.; sent3 & sent9 -> int2: the see does risk bareboating.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the cynodont is resolute but it is not prepositional.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the spectacles is prepositional.; __UNKNOWN__