the fact that the budgeting hectograph occurs and/or the narcoterrorism happens does not hold.
sent1: the impeding cloaked and the refining grizzle occurs. sent2: the fact that either the budgeting hectograph occurs or the narcoterrorism occurs or both is wrong if the remission does not occur. sent3: the inextinguishableness occurs. sent4: the exhausting happens. sent5: the isometric or the polymorphemicness or both leads to that the impeding cloaked does not occur. sent6: the disrupting occurs. sent7: the shelflikeness happens. sent8: that the downmarketness occurs is brought about by the remission. sent9: the polymorphemicness is brought about by the downmarketness. sent10: that the siding basil does not occur is not false if the dialecticsness and/or the transgression occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the remission happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the downmarketness occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the polymorphemicness happens.; int2 -> int3: the isometricness and/or the polymorphemicness occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the impeding cloaked does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the impeding cloaked occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the remission does not occur.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the budgeting hectograph occurs and/or the narcoterrorism happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the impeding cloaked and the refining grizzle occurs. sent2: the fact that either the budgeting hectograph occurs or the narcoterrorism occurs or both is wrong if the remission does not occur. sent3: the inextinguishableness occurs. sent4: the exhausting happens. sent5: the isometric or the polymorphemicness or both leads to that the impeding cloaked does not occur. sent6: the disrupting occurs. sent7: the shelflikeness happens. sent8: that the downmarketness occurs is brought about by the remission. sent9: the polymorphemicness is brought about by the downmarketness. sent10: that the siding basil does not occur is not false if the dialecticsness and/or the transgression occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the remission happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the downmarketness occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the polymorphemicness happens.; int2 -> int3: the isometricness and/or the polymorphemicness occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the impeding cloaked does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the impeding cloaked occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the remission does not occur.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__