the vaporizer does piddle gap.
sent1: the Kichai does germinate and is thoughtful if something is a Limulus. sent2: if the hairdo does not mystify bullfinch and it does not mystify lapidary then it is not a Thackeray. sent3: the fact that the idolizer is a kind of an inclusion and it is a cachinnation is false if the hairdo is not a kind of a Thackeray. sent4: if something is prenatal it is non-papal thing that does hum anesthesiologist. sent5: if that something does not piddle handbell and is not a hornist is not correct it is not a agglutination. sent6: something that does germinate is a kind of a Judith and is not hircine. sent7: if something is not a kind of an inclusion it is a Limulus and it is a kind of a tongue. sent8: the viscounty is biomedical if a Judith is not hircine. sent9: if the tokamak is papal and it does hum anesthesiologist the crud is not acervate. sent10: if the crud is not acervate the vaporizer is acervate. sent11: the vaporizer is acervate and it piddles gap if the crud is not acervate. sent12: the hairdo does not mystify bullfinch and it does not mystify lapidary if it is not a stag. sent13: the vaporizer does not piddle gap but it is papal if it hums anesthesiologist. sent14: the tokamak is non-papal if it is prenatal. sent15: the crud does not piddle gap if the fact that the sudatorium is a kind of prenatal thing that is not acervate is not right. sent16: that something is prenatal but it is not acervate is incorrect if the fact that it is not a agglutination is not wrong. sent17: if the crud does not piddle gap then the vaporizer does not piddle gap. sent18: if there is something such that that it is an inclusion and it is a kind of a cachinnation is wrong the banner is not an inclusion. sent19: the tokamak is not papal. sent20: the crud is not acervate if the tokamak is a kind of non-papal thing that does hum anesthesiologist. sent21: something is not papal if it is prenatal. sent22: the hairdo is not a kind of a stag.
sent4 -> int1: the tokamak is not papal and hums anesthesiologist if it is prenatal.;
the vaporizer does not piddle gap.
sent16 -> int2: if the sudatorium is not a kind of a agglutination that it is prenatal and it is not acervate is not correct.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the sudatorium does not piddle handbell and is not a hornist is not right it is not a kind of a agglutination.; sent6 -> int4: the Kichai is a Judith but it is not hircine if it does germinate.; sent7 -> int5: the banner is a Limulus and it is a kind of a tongue if it is not an inclusion.; sent12 & sent22 -> int6: the hairdo does not mystify bullfinch and it does not mystify lapidary.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the hairdo is not a Thackeray.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: that the idolizer is an inclusion that is a cachinnation is not right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is a kind of an inclusion that is a cachinnation is not true.; int9 & sent18 -> int10: that the banner is not a kind of an inclusion is right.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the banner is a Limulus and tongues.; int11 -> int12: the banner is a Limulus.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is a Limulus.; int13 & sent1 -> int14: the Kichai germinates and it is thoughtful.; int14 -> int15: the Kichai germinates.; int4 & int15 -> int16: the Kichai is a Judith but not hircine.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is both a Judith and not hircine.; int17 & sent8 -> int18: the viscounty is biomedical.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that the fact that it is biomedical is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the vaporizer does piddle gap. ; $context$ = sent1: the Kichai does germinate and is thoughtful if something is a Limulus. sent2: if the hairdo does not mystify bullfinch and it does not mystify lapidary then it is not a Thackeray. sent3: the fact that the idolizer is a kind of an inclusion and it is a cachinnation is false if the hairdo is not a kind of a Thackeray. sent4: if something is prenatal it is non-papal thing that does hum anesthesiologist. sent5: if that something does not piddle handbell and is not a hornist is not correct it is not a agglutination. sent6: something that does germinate is a kind of a Judith and is not hircine. sent7: if something is not a kind of an inclusion it is a Limulus and it is a kind of a tongue. sent8: the viscounty is biomedical if a Judith is not hircine. sent9: if the tokamak is papal and it does hum anesthesiologist the crud is not acervate. sent10: if the crud is not acervate the vaporizer is acervate. sent11: the vaporizer is acervate and it piddles gap if the crud is not acervate. sent12: the hairdo does not mystify bullfinch and it does not mystify lapidary if it is not a stag. sent13: the vaporizer does not piddle gap but it is papal if it hums anesthesiologist. sent14: the tokamak is non-papal if it is prenatal. sent15: the crud does not piddle gap if the fact that the sudatorium is a kind of prenatal thing that is not acervate is not right. sent16: that something is prenatal but it is not acervate is incorrect if the fact that it is not a agglutination is not wrong. sent17: if the crud does not piddle gap then the vaporizer does not piddle gap. sent18: if there is something such that that it is an inclusion and it is a kind of a cachinnation is wrong the banner is not an inclusion. sent19: the tokamak is not papal. sent20: the crud is not acervate if the tokamak is a kind of non-papal thing that does hum anesthesiologist. sent21: something is not papal if it is prenatal. sent22: the hairdo is not a kind of a stag. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the tokamak is not papal and hums anesthesiologist if it is prenatal.; __UNKNOWN__