either the reduction does not occur or the sighting occurs or both.
sent1: the tinker happens. sent2: both the clonicness and the sight happens if the Italicness does not occur. sent3: both the unimportantness and the non-respiratoryness happens if the legislation happens. sent4: the convoy happens. sent5: both the non-thinkableness and the frivoling occurs if the clonicness occurs. sent6: the fact that the legislation happens if that the legislation does not occur and the semiautobiographicalness does not occur is not true is correct. sent7: if the importantness does not occur the Italic happens and the clonicness occurs. sent8: the reduction happens or the sight happens or both. sent9: the empyrealness does not occur. sent10: the pictorialness occurs. sent11: if the allotment happens then that the legislation does not occur and the semiautobiographicalness does not occur is not correct. sent12: the frivoling does not occur and the clonicness does not occur. sent13: that the edging germanium happens prevents that the allotment does not occur. sent14: if the Chechen happens then the courtship occurs. sent15: the clonicness does not occur. sent16: the edging germanium occurs if the politicalness happens. sent17: the digitizing dining-room occurs if the reduction happens. sent18: if the digitizing dining-room occurs the thinkableness happens. sent19: if the thinkableness does not occur and the frivoling occurs then the digitizing dining-room does not occur. sent20: the lobbing flash-forward occurs. sent21: the fact that the ametabolicness happens is not incorrect if the lobbing drunk-and-disorderly happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reduction happens.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the digitizing dining-room occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the thinkableness happens hold.; sent12 -> int3: the frivoling does not occur.;
the bogging ileus happens.
$hypothesis$ = either the reduction does not occur or the sighting occurs or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the tinker happens. sent2: both the clonicness and the sight happens if the Italicness does not occur. sent3: both the unimportantness and the non-respiratoryness happens if the legislation happens. sent4: the convoy happens. sent5: both the non-thinkableness and the frivoling occurs if the clonicness occurs. sent6: the fact that the legislation happens if that the legislation does not occur and the semiautobiographicalness does not occur is not true is correct. sent7: if the importantness does not occur the Italic happens and the clonicness occurs. sent8: the reduction happens or the sight happens or both. sent9: the empyrealness does not occur. sent10: the pictorialness occurs. sent11: if the allotment happens then that the legislation does not occur and the semiautobiographicalness does not occur is not correct. sent12: the frivoling does not occur and the clonicness does not occur. sent13: that the edging germanium happens prevents that the allotment does not occur. sent14: if the Chechen happens then the courtship occurs. sent15: the clonicness does not occur. sent16: the edging germanium occurs if the politicalness happens. sent17: the digitizing dining-room occurs if the reduction happens. sent18: if the digitizing dining-room occurs the thinkableness happens. sent19: if the thinkableness does not occur and the frivoling occurs then the digitizing dining-room does not occur. sent20: the lobbing flash-forward occurs. sent21: the fact that the ametabolicness happens is not incorrect if the lobbing drunk-and-disorderly happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reduction happens.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the digitizing dining-room occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the thinkableness happens hold.; sent12 -> int3: the frivoling does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__