either the lathering biochemistry does not occur or the carnivorousness does not occur or both.
sent1: the tightness does not occur and the denaturalizing dogging happens. sent2: the lathering biochemistry does not occur or the carnivorousness happens or both. sent3: the fact that the holocaust occurs is not wrong. sent4: the holocaust does not occur or the denaturalizing dogging occurs or both if the tightness occurs. sent5: if the holocaust does not occur that the denaturalizing jib and the non-comicness occurs does not hold. sent6: the denaturalizing BMDO happens and the comicness happens. sent7: that both the denaturalizing BMDO and the carnivorousness happens prevents the denaturalizing jib. sent8: if the denaturalizing BMDO does not occur then the fact that the lathering biochemistry does not occur or the carnivorousness does not occur or both is incorrect. sent9: the bolero happens. sent10: the holocaust and the denaturalizing jib happens if the tightness does not occur.
sent6 -> int1: the denaturalizing BMDO occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carnivorousness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the denaturalizing BMDO occurs and the carnivorousness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the denaturalizing jib does not occur.; sent1 -> int4: the tightness does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: both the holocaust and the denaturalizing jib occurs.; int5 -> int6: the denaturalizing jib occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the carnivorousness does not occur is not wrong.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the lathering biochemistry does not occur or the carnivorousness does not occur or both is not right.
$hypothesis$ = either the lathering biochemistry does not occur or the carnivorousness does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the tightness does not occur and the denaturalizing dogging happens. sent2: the lathering biochemistry does not occur or the carnivorousness happens or both. sent3: the fact that the holocaust occurs is not wrong. sent4: the holocaust does not occur or the denaturalizing dogging occurs or both if the tightness occurs. sent5: if the holocaust does not occur that the denaturalizing jib and the non-comicness occurs does not hold. sent6: the denaturalizing BMDO happens and the comicness happens. sent7: that both the denaturalizing BMDO and the carnivorousness happens prevents the denaturalizing jib. sent8: if the denaturalizing BMDO does not occur then the fact that the lathering biochemistry does not occur or the carnivorousness does not occur or both is incorrect. sent9: the bolero happens. sent10: the holocaust and the denaturalizing jib happens if the tightness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the denaturalizing BMDO occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carnivorousness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the denaturalizing BMDO occurs and the carnivorousness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the denaturalizing jib does not occur.; sent1 -> int4: the tightness does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: both the holocaust and the denaturalizing jib occurs.; int5 -> int6: the denaturalizing jib occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the carnivorousness does not occur is not wrong.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__