that there is something such that if it is a Radiigera and/or it is not normal it is Proustian is not correct.
sent1: the Pus is normal if either it is imperishable or it is not a Toulon or both. sent2: if something is Proustian and/or does not spoil endocrinology it is a eider. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Radiigera that it is not Proustian is wrong. sent4: the modern is Proustian if it is a kind of a Radiigera or it is not normal or both.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
if the republication is Proustian or does not spoil endocrinology or both it is a kind of a eider.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a Radiigera and/or it is not normal it is Proustian is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Pus is normal if either it is imperishable or it is not a Toulon or both. sent2: if something is Proustian and/or does not spoil endocrinology it is a eider. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Radiigera that it is not Proustian is wrong. sent4: the modern is Proustian if it is a kind of a Radiigera or it is not normal or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__