that the collider is a sensuality and it is a plunger does not hold.
sent1: something does protest namer and does not destalinize chlorofucin if it is not an incompetent. sent2: everything is not an incompetent. sent3: if the stob is not curious then that the Achaean is not a brachycephalic and protests giantism is not true. sent4: if something does not protest giantism then it is a barnstormer and it is not a plunger. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a plunger then the fact that the collider is fashionable and it is a sensuality does not hold. sent6: the collider is curious if there is something such that that it is both a brachycephalic and not curious is not right. sent7: something is a sensuality if it is curious. sent8: the fact that if the fact that the lacuna is a dried is right then the speciation is adsorbable is correct. sent9: if something does not destalinize chlorofucin that either it is dried or it is adsorbable or both is correct. sent10: there is something such that it is not appendicular and it does not trundle crosshead. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not adsorbable and it is a plump does not hold the hakim is not a plunger. sent12: the Butler is not a plunger. sent13: if the hakim is a spiel that it is brachycephalic thing that is not curious is not correct. sent14: something is a barnstormer if it is not incurious. sent15: the fact that the collider is a sensuality and it is a kind of a plunger is incorrect if the speciation is not a sensuality. sent16: the fact that if something is a brachycephalic then the speciation is curious thing that does protest giantism hold. sent17: the hakim is a spiel if there is something such that it is not appendicular and it does not trundle crosshead. sent18: if the fact that that the stob is a plump and a barnstormer does not hold is correct it is not a kind of a barnstormer. sent19: if the speciation is adsorbable the fact that it is not fashionable and it is a plump does not hold. sent20: that the speciation is adsorbable hold if the lacuna is adsorbable. sent21: the stob is not fashionable. sent22: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is not a brachycephalic and it does protest giantism is true is wrong then the speciation is not a sensuality. sent23: there exists something such that that it is not adsorbable and is a plump is not true. sent24: if the stob is not fashionable then that it does plump and is a barnstormer is not right. sent25: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of fashionable thing that is a sensuality is not correct then the Achaean is a barnstormer.
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the stob is not incurious is right it is a barnstormer.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stob is curious.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the stob is a barnstormer.; sent24 & sent21 -> int3: that the stob is a plump that is a barnstormer does not hold.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the stob is not a barnstormer.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the stob is not curious.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the Achaean is non-brachycephalic and does protest giantism is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-brachycephalic thing that protests giantism is not right.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the speciation is not a sensuality.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the collider is both a sensuality and a plunger.
sent7 -> int10: that the collider is the sensuality if the collider is curious hold.; sent17 & sent10 -> int11: that the hakim does spiel is not incorrect.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: the fact that the hakim is a brachycephalic but it is not curious is not correct.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is a brachycephalic and it is not curious is false.; sent6 & int13 -> int14: the collider is curious.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the collider is a sensuality.; sent4 -> int16: the Achaean is a kind of a barnstormer that is not a plunger if it does not protest giantism.; sent9 -> int17: the wagonwright is a kind of a dried or is adsorbable or both if it does not destalinize chlorofucin.; sent1 -> int18: the rumble does protest namer and does not destalinize chlorofucin if the fact that it is not a kind of an incompetent is true.; sent2 -> int19: the rumble is not an incompetent.; int18 & int19 -> int20: that the rumble protests namer but it does not destalinize chlorofucin is right.; int20 -> int21: everything protests namer and it does not destalinize chlorofucin.; int21 -> int22: the xerox does protest namer and does not destalinize chlorofucin.; int22 -> int23: the xerox does not destalinize chlorofucin.; int23 -> int24: everything does not destalinize chlorofucin.; int24 -> int25: the wagonwright does not destalinize chlorofucin.; int17 & int25 -> int26: the wagonwright is a dried and/or is adsorbable.; int26 -> int27: everything is dried and/or adsorbable.; int27 -> int28: the lacuna is a dried and/or it is adsorbable.; int28 & sent8 & sent20 -> int29: the speciation is adsorbable.; sent19 & int29 -> int30: that the speciation is not fashionable but a plump is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the collider is a sensuality and it is a plunger does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does protest namer and does not destalinize chlorofucin if it is not an incompetent. sent2: everything is not an incompetent. sent3: if the stob is not curious then that the Achaean is not a brachycephalic and protests giantism is not true. sent4: if something does not protest giantism then it is a barnstormer and it is not a plunger. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a plunger then the fact that the collider is fashionable and it is a sensuality does not hold. sent6: the collider is curious if there is something such that that it is both a brachycephalic and not curious is not right. sent7: something is a sensuality if it is curious. sent8: the fact that if the fact that the lacuna is a dried is right then the speciation is adsorbable is correct. sent9: if something does not destalinize chlorofucin that either it is dried or it is adsorbable or both is correct. sent10: there is something such that it is not appendicular and it does not trundle crosshead. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not adsorbable and it is a plump does not hold the hakim is not a plunger. sent12: the Butler is not a plunger. sent13: if the hakim is a spiel that it is brachycephalic thing that is not curious is not correct. sent14: something is a barnstormer if it is not incurious. sent15: the fact that the collider is a sensuality and it is a kind of a plunger is incorrect if the speciation is not a sensuality. sent16: the fact that if something is a brachycephalic then the speciation is curious thing that does protest giantism hold. sent17: the hakim is a spiel if there is something such that it is not appendicular and it does not trundle crosshead. sent18: if the fact that that the stob is a plump and a barnstormer does not hold is correct it is not a kind of a barnstormer. sent19: if the speciation is adsorbable the fact that it is not fashionable and it is a plump does not hold. sent20: that the speciation is adsorbable hold if the lacuna is adsorbable. sent21: the stob is not fashionable. sent22: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is not a brachycephalic and it does protest giantism is true is wrong then the speciation is not a sensuality. sent23: there exists something such that that it is not adsorbable and is a plump is not true. sent24: if the stob is not fashionable then that it does plump and is a barnstormer is not right. sent25: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of fashionable thing that is a sensuality is not correct then the Achaean is a barnstormer. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the stob is not incurious is right it is a barnstormer.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stob is curious.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the stob is a barnstormer.; sent24 & sent21 -> int3: that the stob is a plump that is a barnstormer does not hold.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the stob is not a barnstormer.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the stob is not curious.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the Achaean is non-brachycephalic and does protest giantism is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-brachycephalic thing that protests giantism is not right.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the speciation is not a sensuality.; int9 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__