the justiciary does not spill Spanish.
sent1: something is not maleficent but it juggles. sent2: that the pyxidium coats and is not transitional does not hold if there is something such that it smocks Eureka. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is not maleficent and it is a juggle is false then the justiciary does spill Spanish. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a tape and it is a Utrillo is true. sent5: if the fact that something does not smock constable and does dilapidate president is incorrect then the fact that it is Cyrillic is not wrong. sent6: the doorlock is a modernism if there is something such that the fact that it does not deliver or it is not a purpose or both does not hold. sent7: if something that does dilapidate masochist is not a kind of a verb then it does not smock Megaera. sent8: if the pneumococcus is logarithmic then the fact that it does not smock constable and dilapidates president is not right. sent9: if there is something such that it does not juggle the justiciary does spill Spanish. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is both non-maleficent and a juggle is not correct. sent11: if there is something such that that it is a coated but not transitional is false the paperclip is transitional. sent12: something does not spill Spanish if the fact that it is a Slav and it is not an according is not right. sent13: if the fact that the tramontane is not a streptolysin but it is logarithmic is false then the pneumococcus is logarithmic. sent14: the tramontane is not a kind of a walnut. sent15: if something is a modernism then the Garibaldi dilapidates masochist but it is not a verb. sent16: that the tramontane is not a streptolysin but it is logarithmic is wrong if it is not a walnut. sent17: the medico smocks Eureka if the Garibaldi does not smock Megaera. sent18: that the pneumococcus does not deliver or it is not a purpose or both is false if it is a Cyrillic.
sent10 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the justiciary does not spill Spanish.
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the justiciary is a Slav and not an according is not true it does not spill Spanish.; sent7 -> int2: if the Garibaldi does dilapidate masochist but it is not a kind of a verb then it does not smock Megaera.; sent5 -> int3: the pneumococcus is Cyrillic if that it does not smock constable and it dilapidates president is false.; sent16 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the tramontane is not a kind of a streptolysin and is logarithmic is not correct.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the pneumococcus is logarithmic.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that the pneumococcus does not smock constable but it dilapidates president is not true.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the pneumococcus is a kind of a Cyrillic.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: that the pneumococcus does not deliver and/or it does not purpose is incorrect.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it either does not deliver or does not purpose or both is not true.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the doorlock is a modernism.; int10 -> int11: something is a modernism.; int11 & sent15 -> int12: the Garibaldi dilapidates masochist and is not a verb.; int2 & int12 -> int13: the Garibaldi does not smock Megaera.; sent17 & int13 -> int14: the medico does smock Eureka.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it does smock Eureka.; int15 & sent2 -> int16: that the pyxidium is a kind of a coated that is not transitional is wrong.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a coated and it is not transitional is not true.; int17 & sent11 -> int18: the paperclip is transitional.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it is transitional.;
$hypothesis$ = the justiciary does not spill Spanish. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not maleficent but it juggles. sent2: that the pyxidium coats and is not transitional does not hold if there is something such that it smocks Eureka. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is not maleficent and it is a juggle is false then the justiciary does spill Spanish. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a tape and it is a Utrillo is true. sent5: if the fact that something does not smock constable and does dilapidate president is incorrect then the fact that it is Cyrillic is not wrong. sent6: the doorlock is a modernism if there is something such that the fact that it does not deliver or it is not a purpose or both does not hold. sent7: if something that does dilapidate masochist is not a kind of a verb then it does not smock Megaera. sent8: if the pneumococcus is logarithmic then the fact that it does not smock constable and dilapidates president is not right. sent9: if there is something such that it does not juggle the justiciary does spill Spanish. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is both non-maleficent and a juggle is not correct. sent11: if there is something such that that it is a coated but not transitional is false the paperclip is transitional. sent12: something does not spill Spanish if the fact that it is a Slav and it is not an according is not right. sent13: if the fact that the tramontane is not a streptolysin but it is logarithmic is false then the pneumococcus is logarithmic. sent14: the tramontane is not a kind of a walnut. sent15: if something is a modernism then the Garibaldi dilapidates masochist but it is not a verb. sent16: that the tramontane is not a streptolysin but it is logarithmic is wrong if it is not a walnut. sent17: the medico smocks Eureka if the Garibaldi does not smock Megaera. sent18: that the pneumococcus does not deliver or it is not a purpose or both is false if it is a Cyrillic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__