the mammy does remove privilege.
sent1: the kedgeree is polyatomic. sent2: the kedgeree is heartless if the blackthorn is a subscriber. sent3: the kedgeree is heartless if that the blackthorn is polyatomic but it is not a subscriber does not hold. sent4: if that something is demagogic is correct then it removes privilege. sent5: that the bachelor does not remove jackpot is true if it is nomothetic and it does remove Rajput. sent6: the bachelor removes Rajput. sent7: if that the kedgeree is not heartless does not hold the mammy shampoos. sent8: if the kedgeree is heartless the mammy does not dance Cantharellus and does shampoo. sent9: the mammy is demagogic if it does not dance Cantharellus and it is a shampoo. sent10: if the mammy is non-Chaldean but it removes privilege then it blues. sent11: that if the fact that something does remove privilege and is grammatical is not true then it does not remove privilege hold. sent12: the mammy does remove jackpot. sent13: if the blackthorn is polyatomic and it is a subscriber the bachelor is a kind of a cross-question. sent14: the mammy does shampoo. sent15: if the blackthorn is polyatomic thing that is not a subscriber then the fact that the bachelor is a cross-question is not incorrect. sent16: that the blackthorn is polyatomic thing that is a kind of a subscriber is wrong. sent17: if the fact that something is a kind of non-heartless a cross-question is wrong then it does not remove privilege. sent18: the bachelor is grammatical if it is a cross-question. sent19: the bachelor is nomothetic and it does remove Rajput. sent20: the blackthorn is not a subscriber. sent21: the blackthorn removes Rajput. sent22: the mammy is entomological and it is a kind of a Epimetheus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blackthorn is both polyatomic and not a subscriber.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the bachelor is a cross-question.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: that the bachelor is grammatical is true.; sent5 & sent19 -> int3: the bachelor does not remove jackpot.; sent4 -> int4: if the mammy is demagogic the fact that it removes privilege hold.;
the mammy does not remove privilege.
sent11 -> int5: the fact that the mammy does not remove privilege is not incorrect if that it remove privilege and it is grammatical is incorrect.; sent17 -> int6: if the fact that the blackthorn is not heartless but it is a cross-question is not correct then it does not remove privilege.;
$hypothesis$ = the mammy does remove privilege. ; $context$ = sent1: the kedgeree is polyatomic. sent2: the kedgeree is heartless if the blackthorn is a subscriber. sent3: the kedgeree is heartless if that the blackthorn is polyatomic but it is not a subscriber does not hold. sent4: if that something is demagogic is correct then it removes privilege. sent5: that the bachelor does not remove jackpot is true if it is nomothetic and it does remove Rajput. sent6: the bachelor removes Rajput. sent7: if that the kedgeree is not heartless does not hold the mammy shampoos. sent8: if the kedgeree is heartless the mammy does not dance Cantharellus and does shampoo. sent9: the mammy is demagogic if it does not dance Cantharellus and it is a shampoo. sent10: if the mammy is non-Chaldean but it removes privilege then it blues. sent11: that if the fact that something does remove privilege and is grammatical is not true then it does not remove privilege hold. sent12: the mammy does remove jackpot. sent13: if the blackthorn is polyatomic and it is a subscriber the bachelor is a kind of a cross-question. sent14: the mammy does shampoo. sent15: if the blackthorn is polyatomic thing that is not a subscriber then the fact that the bachelor is a cross-question is not incorrect. sent16: that the blackthorn is polyatomic thing that is a kind of a subscriber is wrong. sent17: if the fact that something is a kind of non-heartless a cross-question is wrong then it does not remove privilege. sent18: the bachelor is grammatical if it is a cross-question. sent19: the bachelor is nomothetic and it does remove Rajput. sent20: the blackthorn is not a subscriber. sent21: the blackthorn removes Rajput. sent22: the mammy is entomological and it is a kind of a Epimetheus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blackthorn is both polyatomic and not a subscriber.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the bachelor is a cross-question.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: that the bachelor is grammatical is true.; sent5 & sent19 -> int3: the bachelor does not remove jackpot.; sent4 -> int4: if the mammy is demagogic the fact that it removes privilege hold.; __UNKNOWN__