the mangrove is neuralgic.
sent1: if a gastroesophageal thing is not a lateralization then the gallinule does soldier etcher. sent2: something does not trisect mangrove. sent3: the gouger is gastroesophageal. sent4: the bridal-wreath soldiers etcher and it trisects shot if the mangrove is not a kind of a choline. sent5: something is gastroesophageal but it is not neuralgic. sent6: there is something such that that it does not zap is true. sent7: the fact that the mangrove does not soldier etcher hold if something is not gastroesophageal. sent8: the mangrove is gastroesophageal but it is not a kind of a lateralization if it is neuralgic. sent9: the mangrove is not a choline if there exists something such that the fact that it does not trisect avalanche is not wrong. sent10: the gallinule is gastroesophageal. sent11: the gallinule does procure and is not healthy. sent12: something is neuralgic and not a lateralization. sent13: the splat is gastroesophageal. sent14: there is something such that it does not trisect avalanche. sent15: if there is something such that it does not zap then the gallinule does not soldier etcher.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mangrove is neuralgic.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the mangrove is gastroesophageal but it is not a lateralization.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is both gastroesophageal and not a lateralization.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the gallinule soldiers etcher.; sent6 & sent15 -> int4: the gallinule does not soldier etcher.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the bridal-wreath does trisect shot but it is not neuralgic.
sent14 & sent9 -> int6: the mangrove is not a choline.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the bridal-wreath does soldier etcher and does trisect shot.; int7 -> int8: the bridal-wreath trisects shot.;
$hypothesis$ = the mangrove is neuralgic. ; $context$ = sent1: if a gastroesophageal thing is not a lateralization then the gallinule does soldier etcher. sent2: something does not trisect mangrove. sent3: the gouger is gastroesophageal. sent4: the bridal-wreath soldiers etcher and it trisects shot if the mangrove is not a kind of a choline. sent5: something is gastroesophageal but it is not neuralgic. sent6: there is something such that that it does not zap is true. sent7: the fact that the mangrove does not soldier etcher hold if something is not gastroesophageal. sent8: the mangrove is gastroesophageal but it is not a kind of a lateralization if it is neuralgic. sent9: the mangrove is not a choline if there exists something such that the fact that it does not trisect avalanche is not wrong. sent10: the gallinule is gastroesophageal. sent11: the gallinule does procure and is not healthy. sent12: something is neuralgic and not a lateralization. sent13: the splat is gastroesophageal. sent14: there is something such that it does not trisect avalanche. sent15: if there is something such that it does not zap then the gallinule does not soldier etcher. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mangrove is neuralgic.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the mangrove is gastroesophageal but it is not a lateralization.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is both gastroesophageal and not a lateralization.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the gallinule soldiers etcher.; sent6 & sent15 -> int4: the gallinule does not soldier etcher.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__