that the fart does not unveil strabismus is true.
sent1: if the fact that the whipstitch is a kind of perineal thing that is not a bodice is incorrect that the fart is not perineal is correct. sent2: the sable does spearhead if there exists something such that the fact that it does unveil strabismus and/or it is a Mammon is not correct. sent3: something does not unveil filth. sent4: the fart does unveil strabismus if there is something such that that it is phonic or it unveils filth or both is not correct. sent5: something that does not unveil strabismus or is not alkalotic or both does not unveil strabismus. sent6: either something does not unveil strabismus or it is not alkalotic or both if it is not perineal. sent7: there exists something such that it is phonic or it unveils filth or both. sent8: the fart unveils filth. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is a flatworm and/or is meteoric does not hold. sent10: there is something such that it is not phonic. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is phonic or it does unveil filth or both is not true. sent12: if something is a ultramicroscope that it is perineal and it is not a kind of a bodice does not hold. sent13: the fart is an insider if there is something such that that the fact that it is a kind of a wool and/or is a synchroscope is not wrong does not hold. sent14: the counterbore unveils strabismus.
sent11 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fart does not unveil strabismus hold.
sent5 -> int1: if the fart does not unveil strabismus and/or is not alkalotic then it does not unveil strabismus.; sent6 -> int2: the fart does not unveil strabismus or it is non-alkalotic or both if it is not perineal.; sent12 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the whipstitch is perineal and not a bodice is false hold if it is a ultramicroscope.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fart does not unveil strabismus is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the whipstitch is a kind of perineal thing that is not a bodice is incorrect that the fart is not perineal is correct. sent2: the sable does spearhead if there exists something such that the fact that it does unveil strabismus and/or it is a Mammon is not correct. sent3: something does not unveil filth. sent4: the fart does unveil strabismus if there is something such that that it is phonic or it unveils filth or both is not correct. sent5: something that does not unveil strabismus or is not alkalotic or both does not unveil strabismus. sent6: either something does not unveil strabismus or it is not alkalotic or both if it is not perineal. sent7: there exists something such that it is phonic or it unveils filth or both. sent8: the fart unveils filth. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is a flatworm and/or is meteoric does not hold. sent10: there is something such that it is not phonic. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is phonic or it does unveil filth or both is not true. sent12: if something is a ultramicroscope that it is perineal and it is not a kind of a bodice does not hold. sent13: the fart is an insider if there is something such that that the fact that it is a kind of a wool and/or is a synchroscope is not wrong does not hold. sent14: the counterbore unveils strabismus. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__