that the saddlecloth is non-light thing that does not chance Lee is not true.
sent1: the candlesnuffer is not a reach. sent2: the fact that the candlesnuffer does not shrimp and it does not chance Lee does not hold. sent3: that the saddlecloth is not a light but it chances Lee does not hold if the candlesnuffer does chance saddlecloth. sent4: if the fact that the fact that something is a reach and it does light is correct does not hold then it is not a kind of a light. sent5: if something is a kind of a convertible and it does strap Fothergilla then it does not process. sent6: the fact that that the Lee does not chance Lee and is not an agnostic is correct is wrong if there is something such that it is a reach. sent7: the candlesnuffer is a kind of non-low-interest thing that demineralizes ornamentalism. sent8: if the saddlecloth does reach that the candlesnuffer does not chance Lee and is not a light is false. sent9: that the cohune does not overtake if there is something such that it is a loaner and is not a plication hold. sent10: everything is a convertible and it straps Fothergilla. sent11: that the saddlecloth does chance saddlecloth and it does light does not hold if there is something such that it does not overtake. sent12: the fact that the Fothergilla is not apologetics and it does not chance Lee is not right. sent13: the fact that the candlesnuffer does not light and does not chance Lee is not true if the saddlecloth chances saddlecloth. sent14: that the saddlecloth lights but it does not chance Lee is not right. sent15: the candlesnuffer does not reach and chances saddlecloth. sent16: that the saddlecloth is a kind of a light and does not chance Lee is wrong if the candlesnuffer does chance saddlecloth. sent17: that that the saddlecloth does not light and chances Lee is false hold. sent18: that the fact that the candlesnuffer does not light and it does not chance Lee is not correct is correct if the saddlecloth does reach. sent19: the candlesnuffer is a kind of a duke.
sent15 -> int1: the candlesnuffer does chance saddlecloth.;
the saddlecloth is not a kind of a light and it does not chance Lee.
sent4 -> int2: the fact that the saddlecloth is not a kind of the light if that the saddlecloth does reach and light is not true hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the saddlecloth is non-light thing that does not chance Lee is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the candlesnuffer is not a reach. sent2: the fact that the candlesnuffer does not shrimp and it does not chance Lee does not hold. sent3: that the saddlecloth is not a light but it chances Lee does not hold if the candlesnuffer does chance saddlecloth. sent4: if the fact that the fact that something is a reach and it does light is correct does not hold then it is not a kind of a light. sent5: if something is a kind of a convertible and it does strap Fothergilla then it does not process. sent6: the fact that that the Lee does not chance Lee and is not an agnostic is correct is wrong if there is something such that it is a reach. sent7: the candlesnuffer is a kind of non-low-interest thing that demineralizes ornamentalism. sent8: if the saddlecloth does reach that the candlesnuffer does not chance Lee and is not a light is false. sent9: that the cohune does not overtake if there is something such that it is a loaner and is not a plication hold. sent10: everything is a convertible and it straps Fothergilla. sent11: that the saddlecloth does chance saddlecloth and it does light does not hold if there is something such that it does not overtake. sent12: the fact that the Fothergilla is not apologetics and it does not chance Lee is not right. sent13: the fact that the candlesnuffer does not light and does not chance Lee is not true if the saddlecloth chances saddlecloth. sent14: that the saddlecloth lights but it does not chance Lee is not right. sent15: the candlesnuffer does not reach and chances saddlecloth. sent16: that the saddlecloth is a kind of a light and does not chance Lee is wrong if the candlesnuffer does chance saddlecloth. sent17: that that the saddlecloth does not light and chances Lee is false hold. sent18: that the fact that the candlesnuffer does not light and it does not chance Lee is not correct is correct if the saddlecloth does reach. sent19: the candlesnuffer is a kind of a duke. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the candlesnuffer does chance saddlecloth.; __UNKNOWN__