that the hypotonicity is not a tricycle but it is xenogeneic if that the subthalamus does not formalize senility hold is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a sedition and it is a chorale is wrong. sent2: the motorcycle is not a busyness if the fact that the grison is a battlefield but it is not modal is wrong. sent3: the fact that the subthalamus is a sedition and a chorale is not right. sent4: the Jainist is a kind of heterodactyl a sedition. sent5: something is a kind of a sedition and is not a chorale. sent6: the bluster is not non-modal and it is a busyness if that something is a battlefield hold. sent7: if there is something such that it is a battlefield then the fact that the bluster is a kind of a modal is right. sent8: something is a battlefield. sent9: the motorcycle does formalize senility and is a sedition if there is something such that it is a busyness. sent10: the bluster is a modal. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is a sedition and it is not a chorale does not hold that the hypotonicity is xenogeneic is true. sent12: if the hypotonicity is a modal then the bluster is not a tricycle. sent13: if the bluster is a busyness then the motorcycle is a busyness. sent14: the bluster is African and is a sedition if the subthalamus is not a chorale. sent15: the hypotonicity formalizes senility and is a tricycle if there exists something such that it is not a busyness. sent16: if the motorcycle is a kind of a busyness then the fact that the hypotonicity is a tricycle does not hold. sent17: if that something is a kind of non-xenogeneic thing that is a chorale is incorrect then it is not a chorale. sent18: if the subthalamus is a sedition then it does formalize senility. sent19: if something formalizes senility then that the subthalamus is not xenogeneic but it is a chorale is false. sent20: the subthalamus is not a chorale. sent21: if there is something such that the fact that it is a chorale is right the subthalamus formalizes senility and is a tricycle. sent22: the hypotonicity is xenogeneic if there exists something such that it is a chorale. sent23: the hypotonicity is not a tricycle but it is xenogeneic if the subthalamus does formalize senility.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the subthalamus is a sedition and is not a chorale.; assump2 -> int1: the subthalamus is a sedition.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the subthalamus does formalize senility.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subthalamus does not formalize senility.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the subthalamus is a kind of a sedition and is not a chorale does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of a sedition and is not a chorale is wrong.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: that the hypotonicity is xenogeneic is not wrong.; sent8 & sent6 -> int7: the bluster is modal and it is a kind of a busyness.; int7 -> int8: the bluster is a busyness.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the motorcycle is a busyness.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the hypotonicity is not a tricycle.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the hypotonicity is not a kind of a tricycle and is xenogeneic.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the bluster is African.
sent17 -> int12: if the fact that the subthalamus is not xenogeneic but it is a kind of a chorale is incorrect then it is not a chorale.;
$hypothesis$ = that the hypotonicity is not a tricycle but it is xenogeneic if that the subthalamus does not formalize senility hold is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a sedition and it is a chorale is wrong. sent2: the motorcycle is not a busyness if the fact that the grison is a battlefield but it is not modal is wrong. sent3: the fact that the subthalamus is a sedition and a chorale is not right. sent4: the Jainist is a kind of heterodactyl a sedition. sent5: something is a kind of a sedition and is not a chorale. sent6: the bluster is not non-modal and it is a busyness if that something is a battlefield hold. sent7: if there is something such that it is a battlefield then the fact that the bluster is a kind of a modal is right. sent8: something is a battlefield. sent9: the motorcycle does formalize senility and is a sedition if there is something such that it is a busyness. sent10: the bluster is a modal. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is a sedition and it is not a chorale does not hold that the hypotonicity is xenogeneic is true. sent12: if the hypotonicity is a modal then the bluster is not a tricycle. sent13: if the bluster is a busyness then the motorcycle is a busyness. sent14: the bluster is African and is a sedition if the subthalamus is not a chorale. sent15: the hypotonicity formalizes senility and is a tricycle if there exists something such that it is not a busyness. sent16: if the motorcycle is a kind of a busyness then the fact that the hypotonicity is a tricycle does not hold. sent17: if that something is a kind of non-xenogeneic thing that is a chorale is incorrect then it is not a chorale. sent18: if the subthalamus is a sedition then it does formalize senility. sent19: if something formalizes senility then that the subthalamus is not xenogeneic but it is a chorale is false. sent20: the subthalamus is not a chorale. sent21: if there is something such that the fact that it is a chorale is right the subthalamus formalizes senility and is a tricycle. sent22: the hypotonicity is xenogeneic if there exists something such that it is a chorale. sent23: the hypotonicity is not a tricycle but it is xenogeneic if the subthalamus does formalize senility. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the subthalamus is a sedition and is not a chorale.; assump2 -> int1: the subthalamus is a sedition.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the subthalamus does formalize senility.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subthalamus does not formalize senility.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the subthalamus is a kind of a sedition and is not a chorale does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of a sedition and is not a chorale is wrong.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: that the hypotonicity is xenogeneic is not wrong.; sent8 & sent6 -> int7: the bluster is modal and it is a kind of a busyness.; int7 -> int8: the bluster is a busyness.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the motorcycle is a busyness.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the hypotonicity is not a tricycle.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the hypotonicity is not a kind of a tricycle and is xenogeneic.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__