that there is something such that if it is a kind of a recoil that it dogmatizes onychosis and it does not determine monstera is false is not correct.
sent1: if the border is a miniskirt it is both euclidian and not a void. sent2: that the exegete dogmatizes onychosis but it does not determine monstera is wrong if it is a recoil. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a harangue then it is bicipital and not an anthology. sent4: the fact that that something is heteroecious thing that does not telescope is true is wrong if it does dogmatize onychosis.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the photographer is heteroecious but it is not a telescope is not correct if it dogmatizes onychosis.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a kind of a recoil that it dogmatizes onychosis and it does not determine monstera is false is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the border is a miniskirt it is both euclidian and not a void. sent2: that the exegete dogmatizes onychosis but it does not determine monstera is wrong if it is a recoil. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a harangue then it is bicipital and not an anthology. sent4: the fact that that something is heteroecious thing that does not telescope is true is wrong if it does dogmatize onychosis. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__