the perithelium is not appellative.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is proximal thing that is not a kind of a pragmatics is not true then the appointee is a pragmatics. sent2: the fact that the chondrule is proximal but it is not pragmatics is wrong if it is a electrosurgery. sent3: if that the satyr is a Gwynn and it is a forester is false then the perithelium is not a kind of a Gwynn. sent4: the chondrule is a electrosurgery if the dandy is a kind of a electrosurgery. sent5: the dandy is a kind of a electrosurgery and it is a kind of a buttock. sent6: if something does not unionize fetoscope then the fact that it is a Gwynn and is a forester does not hold. sent7: that the appointee is a housework is correct if it is a pragmatics. sent8: if something is caudate then it is dystopian. sent9: the satyr does not unionize fetoscope. sent10: if the perithelium is not a Gwynn the appointee is a manor and is a kind of an intron. sent11: if something is a housework it is a caudate. sent12: the satyr is dystopian and is a kind of a manor.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the perithelium is not adjectival and not appellative is false.; sent12 -> int1: the satyr is dystopian.;
the appointee is dystopian and it is a kind of an intron.
sent8 -> int2: the appointee is dystopian if it is caudate.; sent11 -> int3: if the appointee is a housework then it is a caudate.; sent5 -> int4: the dandy is a electrosurgery.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the chondrule is a kind of a electrosurgery.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the chondrule is proximal thing that is not a kind of a pragmatics is incorrect.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is proximal and is not pragmatics is not true.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the appointee is a pragmatics.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the appointee is a housework.; int3 & int9 -> int10: the appointee is a caudate.; int2 & int10 -> int11: the appointee is dystopian.; sent6 -> int12: if the satyr does not unionize fetoscope then that it is a Gwynn and a forester is incorrect.; int12 & sent9 -> int13: the fact that the satyr is a Gwynn and is a kind of a forester is incorrect.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the perithelium is not a Gwynn.; sent10 & int14 -> int15: the appointee is a manor and is a kind of an intron.; int15 -> int16: the appointee is an intron.; int11 & int16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the perithelium is not appellative. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is proximal thing that is not a kind of a pragmatics is not true then the appointee is a pragmatics. sent2: the fact that the chondrule is proximal but it is not pragmatics is wrong if it is a electrosurgery. sent3: if that the satyr is a Gwynn and it is a forester is false then the perithelium is not a kind of a Gwynn. sent4: the chondrule is a electrosurgery if the dandy is a kind of a electrosurgery. sent5: the dandy is a kind of a electrosurgery and it is a kind of a buttock. sent6: if something does not unionize fetoscope then the fact that it is a Gwynn and is a forester does not hold. sent7: that the appointee is a housework is correct if it is a pragmatics. sent8: if something is caudate then it is dystopian. sent9: the satyr does not unionize fetoscope. sent10: if the perithelium is not a Gwynn the appointee is a manor and is a kind of an intron. sent11: if something is a housework it is a caudate. sent12: the satyr is dystopian and is a kind of a manor. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the perithelium is not adjectival and not appellative is false.; sent12 -> int1: the satyr is dystopian.; __UNKNOWN__