the sequencer is not a souk and it is not a kind of a count.
sent1: the sequencer does not count. sent2: if the fact that something is not handleless and does not citify pothook is not true it is handleless. sent3: that the radiomicrometer is not incalculable is right if that the fiddlestick builds e and is not woody is not right. sent4: if the fact that something does not braid oenomel but it is incalculable is incorrect then it is a kind of a battlefront. sent5: the subcontractor is not a kind of a Hillary and it is not a battlefront. sent6: the pricket is not a kind of a delinquent if the fact that the dace is a kind of a cent but it is not an internment does not hold. sent7: the radiomicrometer does not braid jazz and it is not a half-sister. sent8: the sequencer is not a battlefront. sent9: if something is non-ink-jet then that it does build e and is not woody does not hold. sent10: the fact that something is a cent but it is not an internment does not hold if it is handleless. sent11: the fact that the sequencer is not a souk and it is not a count is wrong if the radiomicrometer is a kind of a battlefront. sent12: the sequencer is both not a retreatant and not a link. sent13: there exists something such that that it is not a uplink and it is not a research is false. sent14: the fact that the dace is not handleless and does not citify pothook is incorrect if the fact that it is a uplink hold. sent15: the monstera is both not a souk and not Freudian. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a uplink and does not research is wrong the fact that the dace is a uplink is not incorrect. sent17: the sequencer is not a souk and is not a count if the fact that the radiomicrometer is not a battlefront hold. sent18: the radiomicrometer is not a battlefront. sent19: if the radiomicrometer is not a battlefront then the sequencer is not a kind of a count. sent20: the sequencer is not a battlefront and it is not a kind of a souk if the radiomicrometer is not a count. sent21: something is a battlefront and it braids oenomel if it is not incalculable.
sent17 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
that the sequencer is not a souk and is not a kind of a count is not right.
sent21 -> int1: if the radiomicrometer is not incalculable then it is a battlefront and it does braid oenomel.; sent9 -> int2: that the fiddlestick does build e but it is not woody is not correct if it is not ink-jet.; sent10 -> int3: the fact that the dace is a kind of a cent but it is not a kind of an internment is not true if it is handleless.; sent2 -> int4: the dace is handleless if the fact that it is not handleless and it does not citify pothook is not true.; sent13 & sent16 -> int5: the dace is a kind of a uplink.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: that the dace is a kind of handled thing that does not citify pothook does not hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the dace is handleless.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the dace is both a cent and not an internment is not true.; sent6 & int8 -> int9: the pricket is not a delinquent.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not a delinquent.;
$hypothesis$ = the sequencer is not a souk and it is not a kind of a count. ; $context$ = sent1: the sequencer does not count. sent2: if the fact that something is not handleless and does not citify pothook is not true it is handleless. sent3: that the radiomicrometer is not incalculable is right if that the fiddlestick builds e and is not woody is not right. sent4: if the fact that something does not braid oenomel but it is incalculable is incorrect then it is a kind of a battlefront. sent5: the subcontractor is not a kind of a Hillary and it is not a battlefront. sent6: the pricket is not a kind of a delinquent if the fact that the dace is a kind of a cent but it is not an internment does not hold. sent7: the radiomicrometer does not braid jazz and it is not a half-sister. sent8: the sequencer is not a battlefront. sent9: if something is non-ink-jet then that it does build e and is not woody does not hold. sent10: the fact that something is a cent but it is not an internment does not hold if it is handleless. sent11: the fact that the sequencer is not a souk and it is not a count is wrong if the radiomicrometer is a kind of a battlefront. sent12: the sequencer is both not a retreatant and not a link. sent13: there exists something such that that it is not a uplink and it is not a research is false. sent14: the fact that the dace is not handleless and does not citify pothook is incorrect if the fact that it is a uplink hold. sent15: the monstera is both not a souk and not Freudian. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a uplink and does not research is wrong the fact that the dace is a uplink is not incorrect. sent17: the sequencer is not a souk and is not a count if the fact that the radiomicrometer is not a battlefront hold. sent18: the radiomicrometer is not a battlefront. sent19: if the radiomicrometer is not a battlefront then the sequencer is not a kind of a count. sent20: the sequencer is not a battlefront and it is not a kind of a souk if the radiomicrometer is not a count. sent21: something is a battlefront and it braids oenomel if it is not incalculable. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__