that the nothosaur is a kind of a Tunisian is true.
sent1: the brickyard is quadratics or it is not obligatory or both if there exists something such that it does not legitimate. sent2: if the brickyard is not obligatory then the captopril is both legitimate and quadratics. sent3: something is a Brachychiton if it does not mooch mailing and it is not biosystematic. sent4: there exists something such that it reorients zero and it is acanthotic. sent5: something mooches mailing if it is not neurophysiological. sent6: if the toyshop is Tunisian the captopril does not mooch mailing and it is not biosystematic. sent7: the nothosaur adapts rent-rebate. sent8: if that the omission is not neurophysiological and is not a thalassemia is not true the toyshop is a Tunisian. sent9: if something is a thalassemia then it is not neurophysiological. sent10: there is something such that it is not legitimate. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is mutable hold. sent12: if something that is interlocutory mooches mailing the omission is not biosystematic. sent13: the brickyard is a Tunisian. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it adapts recitation and it is a kind of a Orchestia is not true. sent15: the nothosaur is Tunisian if the omission is not biosystematic. sent16: the fact that the monster does not mooch honeycomb and is a kind of a thalassemia does not hold. sent17: something is not wearable and/or it reorients conflicting. sent18: there exists something such that it thins. sent19: the fact that the nothosaur is interlocutory is correct if a store does mooch honeycomb. sent20: something does reorient pelvimetry. sent21: the monster does screen and it does adapt suited. sent22: that the fact that the omission is not neurophysiological and not a thalassemia is right is incorrect if that the monster is a screening is correct. sent23: if there exists something such that that either it is a quadratics or it is not obligatory or both is true the toyshop is interlocutory. sent24: if the omission is obligatory the fact that it is not interlocutory but quadratics is not correct. sent25: the garter is a store and it does mooch honeycomb if the monstera does not adapt recitation. sent26: the toyshop is a thalassemia if that the monster does not mooch honeycomb and is a kind of a thalassemia is wrong. sent27: the toyshop is not contestable. sent28: the monstera does not adapt recitation if there is something such that that it adapt recitation and it is a Orchestia is false.
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the brickyard is a quadratics and/or is not obligatory.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a quadratics and/or is not obligatory.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the fact that the toyshop is interlocutory is correct.; sent5 -> int4: if the toyshop is not neurophysiological it does mooch mailing.; sent9 -> int5: the toyshop is not neurophysiological if it is a kind of a thalassemia.; sent26 & sent16 -> int6: the toyshop is a thalassemia.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the toyshop is not neurophysiological.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the toyshop mooches mailing.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the toyshop is interlocutory and it mooches mailing.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is interlocutory and mooches mailing.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the omission is not biosystematic.; int11 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the nothosaur is not a Tunisian.
$hypothesis$ = that the nothosaur is a kind of a Tunisian is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the brickyard is quadratics or it is not obligatory or both if there exists something such that it does not legitimate. sent2: if the brickyard is not obligatory then the captopril is both legitimate and quadratics. sent3: something is a Brachychiton if it does not mooch mailing and it is not biosystematic. sent4: there exists something such that it reorients zero and it is acanthotic. sent5: something mooches mailing if it is not neurophysiological. sent6: if the toyshop is Tunisian the captopril does not mooch mailing and it is not biosystematic. sent7: the nothosaur adapts rent-rebate. sent8: if that the omission is not neurophysiological and is not a thalassemia is not true the toyshop is a Tunisian. sent9: if something is a thalassemia then it is not neurophysiological. sent10: there is something such that it is not legitimate. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is mutable hold. sent12: if something that is interlocutory mooches mailing the omission is not biosystematic. sent13: the brickyard is a Tunisian. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it adapts recitation and it is a kind of a Orchestia is not true. sent15: the nothosaur is Tunisian if the omission is not biosystematic. sent16: the fact that the monster does not mooch honeycomb and is a kind of a thalassemia does not hold. sent17: something is not wearable and/or it reorients conflicting. sent18: there exists something such that it thins. sent19: the fact that the nothosaur is interlocutory is correct if a store does mooch honeycomb. sent20: something does reorient pelvimetry. sent21: the monster does screen and it does adapt suited. sent22: that the fact that the omission is not neurophysiological and not a thalassemia is right is incorrect if that the monster is a screening is correct. sent23: if there exists something such that that either it is a quadratics or it is not obligatory or both is true the toyshop is interlocutory. sent24: if the omission is obligatory the fact that it is not interlocutory but quadratics is not correct. sent25: the garter is a store and it does mooch honeycomb if the monstera does not adapt recitation. sent26: the toyshop is a thalassemia if that the monster does not mooch honeycomb and is a kind of a thalassemia is wrong. sent27: the toyshop is not contestable. sent28: the monstera does not adapt recitation if there is something such that that it adapt recitation and it is a Orchestia is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the brickyard is a quadratics and/or is not obligatory.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a quadratics and/or is not obligatory.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the fact that the toyshop is interlocutory is correct.; sent5 -> int4: if the toyshop is not neurophysiological it does mooch mailing.; sent9 -> int5: the toyshop is not neurophysiological if it is a kind of a thalassemia.; sent26 & sent16 -> int6: the toyshop is a thalassemia.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the toyshop is not neurophysiological.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the toyshop mooches mailing.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the toyshop is interlocutory and it mooches mailing.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is interlocutory and mooches mailing.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the omission is not biosystematic.; int11 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__