that the voodoo is a kind of a valdecoxib hold.
sent1: something is a valdecoxib that is a Trinidadian if it is not octal. sent2: something does not dwarf chanterelle and is a pest. sent3: if the chanterelle is a kind of a valdecoxib that is a Trinidadian the voodoo is not a valdecoxib. sent4: something is a kind of a valdecoxib if it is a jowl. sent5: the fact that that the regent is not articulate and it is not an inclusion is not correct hold if the Kleenex is tongueless. sent6: the chanterelle is impersonal and chisels. sent7: the fact that the voodoo is not a jowl but it is a kind of a negus is wrong. sent8: if the megathere is not a negus then that the voodoo is not an inclusion but a jowl is wrong. sent9: there is something such that it is octal. sent10: there is something such that it is a Trinidadian. sent11: the chanterelle is tongueless. sent12: there exists something such that that it does not dwarf chanterelle and it is a kind of a pest is false. sent13: the Kleenex is tongueless. sent14: if the megathere is not a negus then that the voodoo is not an inclusion and is not a kind of a jowl does not hold. sent15: that if the fact that something is not a kind of an inclusion and is not a jowl does not hold it is a valdecoxib is correct. sent16: the chanterelle is former. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a negus and is a valdecoxib is correct does not hold. sent18: the Stone is a kind of an exponent and it is an inclusion. sent19: the chanterelle is a kind of tongueless thing that is a kind of a Trinidadian. sent20: the chanterelle is octal if there is something such that the fact that it does not dwarf chanterelle and it is a pest is false. sent21: something is an inclusion if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-articulate thing that is not an inclusion is not false does not hold. sent22: if a octal thing is a negus then the chanterelle is not tongueless. sent23: the megathere is not a negus if there exists something such that it is a Trinidadian and it is octal.
sent12 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the chanterelle is octal is not incorrect.; sent19 -> int2: the chanterelle is Trinidadian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chanterelle is Trinidadian and it is octal.; int3 -> int4: the fact that there is something such that it is both Trinidadian and octal is not wrong.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the megathere is not a negus.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the voodoo is not an inclusion and is not a jowl is false.; sent15 -> int7: the voodoo is a kind of a valdecoxib if the fact that the fact that it is both not an inclusion and not a jowl is not false is wrong.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
something is both former and a kaolin.
$hypothesis$ = that the voodoo is a kind of a valdecoxib hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a valdecoxib that is a Trinidadian if it is not octal. sent2: something does not dwarf chanterelle and is a pest. sent3: if the chanterelle is a kind of a valdecoxib that is a Trinidadian the voodoo is not a valdecoxib. sent4: something is a kind of a valdecoxib if it is a jowl. sent5: the fact that that the regent is not articulate and it is not an inclusion is not correct hold if the Kleenex is tongueless. sent6: the chanterelle is impersonal and chisels. sent7: the fact that the voodoo is not a jowl but it is a kind of a negus is wrong. sent8: if the megathere is not a negus then that the voodoo is not an inclusion but a jowl is wrong. sent9: there is something such that it is octal. sent10: there is something such that it is a Trinidadian. sent11: the chanterelle is tongueless. sent12: there exists something such that that it does not dwarf chanterelle and it is a kind of a pest is false. sent13: the Kleenex is tongueless. sent14: if the megathere is not a negus then that the voodoo is not an inclusion and is not a kind of a jowl does not hold. sent15: that if the fact that something is not a kind of an inclusion and is not a jowl does not hold it is a valdecoxib is correct. sent16: the chanterelle is former. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a negus and is a valdecoxib is correct does not hold. sent18: the Stone is a kind of an exponent and it is an inclusion. sent19: the chanterelle is a kind of tongueless thing that is a kind of a Trinidadian. sent20: the chanterelle is octal if there is something such that the fact that it does not dwarf chanterelle and it is a pest is false. sent21: something is an inclusion if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-articulate thing that is not an inclusion is not false does not hold. sent22: if a octal thing is a negus then the chanterelle is not tongueless. sent23: the megathere is not a negus if there exists something such that it is a Trinidadian and it is octal. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the chanterelle is octal is not incorrect.; sent19 -> int2: the chanterelle is Trinidadian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chanterelle is Trinidadian and it is octal.; int3 -> int4: the fact that there is something such that it is both Trinidadian and octal is not wrong.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the megathere is not a negus.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the voodoo is not an inclusion and is not a jowl is false.; sent15 -> int7: the voodoo is a kind of a valdecoxib if the fact that the fact that it is both not an inclusion and not a jowl is not false is wrong.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__