the contorting unfavorableness happens and the spectacles happens.
sent1: the homileticness happens if the fitting fart happens. sent2: the noncombustibleness brings about the bedizening Flory. sent3: if the contorting Perth does not occur the dashing occurs. sent4: if the bigness does not occur the spectacles and the intention occurs. sent5: the contorting unfavorableness happens if the bedizening Flory does not occur. sent6: that if the Turkey occurs then the fact that the noncombustibleness does not occur and the spectacles does not occur is not correct is correct. sent7: the Turkey occurs if the bigness occurs. sent8: that the contorting Perth occurs is prevented by that the appellativeness and the bedizening Flory occurs. sent9: that the contorting unfavorableness does not occur and the extracellularness occurs prevents that the dash occurs. sent10: the bedizening Flory occurs if the Turkey occurs. sent11: the extracellularness does not occur. sent12: that the therapy happens is not wrong. sent13: that the intention does not occur and the extracellularness occurs leads to that the dash does not occur. sent14: that the posting happens and the fitting flavin does not occur is wrong if the moonshine occurs. sent15: the temptation is prevented by that the Turkey does not occur and the noncombustibleness does not occur. sent16: if the intention occurs then the fact that both the dashing and the non-extracellularness happens is false. sent17: if the constellating occurs the threat occurs. sent18: the fact that the fact that the clinicalness occurs and the trim occurs hold is not true. sent19: the informing happens if the trimming occurs. sent20: if the appellativeness does not occur that the contorting unfavorableness occurs and the spectacles happens is false. sent21: if the fact that the noncombustibleness does not occur and the spectacles does not occur does not hold then the spectacles happens. sent22: the Turkey happens and/or the noncombustibleness happens. sent23: the intention happens. sent24: the decreeing happens. sent25: that the scouring happens and the pleomorphicness happens does not hold. sent26: if the deception happens the extracellularness and the cooperativeness happens.
sent22 & sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the bedizening Flory occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appellativeness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the appellativeness and the bedizening Flory occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the contorting Perth does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the dashing happens.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the dash but not the extracellularness happens.; sent16 & sent23 -> int6: the fact that the dash occurs but the extracellularness does not occur is wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the appellativeness does not occur.; int8 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
both the contorting unfavorableness and the spectacles occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the contorting unfavorableness happens and the spectacles happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the homileticness happens if the fitting fart happens. sent2: the noncombustibleness brings about the bedizening Flory. sent3: if the contorting Perth does not occur the dashing occurs. sent4: if the bigness does not occur the spectacles and the intention occurs. sent5: the contorting unfavorableness happens if the bedizening Flory does not occur. sent6: that if the Turkey occurs then the fact that the noncombustibleness does not occur and the spectacles does not occur is not correct is correct. sent7: the Turkey occurs if the bigness occurs. sent8: that the contorting Perth occurs is prevented by that the appellativeness and the bedizening Flory occurs. sent9: that the contorting unfavorableness does not occur and the extracellularness occurs prevents that the dash occurs. sent10: the bedizening Flory occurs if the Turkey occurs. sent11: the extracellularness does not occur. sent12: that the therapy happens is not wrong. sent13: that the intention does not occur and the extracellularness occurs leads to that the dash does not occur. sent14: that the posting happens and the fitting flavin does not occur is wrong if the moonshine occurs. sent15: the temptation is prevented by that the Turkey does not occur and the noncombustibleness does not occur. sent16: if the intention occurs then the fact that both the dashing and the non-extracellularness happens is false. sent17: if the constellating occurs the threat occurs. sent18: the fact that the fact that the clinicalness occurs and the trim occurs hold is not true. sent19: the informing happens if the trimming occurs. sent20: if the appellativeness does not occur that the contorting unfavorableness occurs and the spectacles happens is false. sent21: if the fact that the noncombustibleness does not occur and the spectacles does not occur does not hold then the spectacles happens. sent22: the Turkey happens and/or the noncombustibleness happens. sent23: the intention happens. sent24: the decreeing happens. sent25: that the scouring happens and the pleomorphicness happens does not hold. sent26: if the deception happens the extracellularness and the cooperativeness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the bedizening Flory occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appellativeness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the appellativeness and the bedizening Flory occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the contorting Perth does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the dashing happens.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the dash but not the extracellularness happens.; sent16 & sent23 -> int6: the fact that the dash occurs but the extracellularness does not occur is wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the appellativeness does not occur.; int8 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__