the capiz is not a kind of a Stercorarius.
sent1: that something is not unattractive and is a debater is not true if it is a Sikh. sent2: the mouthbreeder is a strangler if a non-Sikh thing is not unattractive. sent3: that the holothurian is juvenile but it is not unattractive hold. sent4: the hag is not a kind of a roarer and is a blowtube if it is not a strangler. sent5: if the holothurian is not unattractive then it is not sexual. sent6: something is not a Azolla if that it is a blowtube that is not unattractive does not hold. sent7: the organification does not interfere Tiffany. sent8: the mouthbreeder is not a strangler if there exists something such that that it does dwarf warner and it is a strangler is not right. sent9: if something does not dwarf warner it is not a juvenile. sent10: the countertenor is a strangler if the holothurian is not a Azolla. sent11: something that is non-sexual is not a kind of a Stercorarius. sent12: the heroine is not a juvenile. sent13: the countertenor is not a kind of a Sikh if there is something such that that it is a Azolla and it is a Sikh is not right. sent14: something is not sexual but it is a Azolla if it is not a juvenile. sent15: if the countertenor is not unattractive then the holothurian is non-Sikh thing that is not unattractive. sent16: that the fact that the heroine does dwarf warner and it is a kind of a strangler is wrong is right if it is not a juvenile. sent17: if the mouthbreeder is not sexual but it is a Azolla then the holothurian is not a Azolla. sent18: if that the countertenor is a kind of attractive a debater is incorrect the hag is not a kind of a debater. sent19: the wall is not a kind of a Stercorarius. sent20: something is not indecisive but it is a cover-up. sent21: something is not a sleeping if the fact that it is nonhierarchical and it is not a martyrdom is false. sent22: if there is something such that it is not a cat's-claw the fact that the countertenor is not a cat's-claw hold. sent23: there is something such that it does not uplift sailfish and is a Tay. sent24: the fact that the heroine is a strangler and is a Stercorarius does not hold. sent25: something is not unattractive if it is a strangler. sent26: the capiz is a strangler or is not Sikh or both if there exists something such that it is a strangler.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the countertenor is a kind of a blowtube but it is not unattractive.; assump1 -> int1: the countertenor is not unattractive.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the holothurian is not a Sikh and is not unattractive.; int2 -> int3: there are non-Sikh and attractive things.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the mouthbreeder is a strangler.; sent16 & sent12 -> int5: that the heroine dwarfs warner and it is a strangler is incorrect.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it does dwarf warner and it is a strangler is false.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the mouthbreeder is not a strangler.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the countertenor is a kind of a blowtube but it is not unattractive is false.; sent6 -> int10: if that the countertenor is a blowtube but it is not unattractive is not correct it is not a Azolla.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the countertenor is not a Azolla.; sent11 -> int12: the capiz is not a Stercorarius if it is not sexual.;
the capiz is a Stercorarius.
sent14 -> int13: if the mouthbreeder is not a juvenile it is not sexual and it is a kind of a Azolla.; sent25 -> int14: that the capiz is not unattractive is not incorrect if it is a strangler.;
$hypothesis$ = the capiz is not a kind of a Stercorarius. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not unattractive and is a debater is not true if it is a Sikh. sent2: the mouthbreeder is a strangler if a non-Sikh thing is not unattractive. sent3: that the holothurian is juvenile but it is not unattractive hold. sent4: the hag is not a kind of a roarer and is a blowtube if it is not a strangler. sent5: if the holothurian is not unattractive then it is not sexual. sent6: something is not a Azolla if that it is a blowtube that is not unattractive does not hold. sent7: the organification does not interfere Tiffany. sent8: the mouthbreeder is not a strangler if there exists something such that that it does dwarf warner and it is a strangler is not right. sent9: if something does not dwarf warner it is not a juvenile. sent10: the countertenor is a strangler if the holothurian is not a Azolla. sent11: something that is non-sexual is not a kind of a Stercorarius. sent12: the heroine is not a juvenile. sent13: the countertenor is not a kind of a Sikh if there is something such that that it is a Azolla and it is a Sikh is not right. sent14: something is not sexual but it is a Azolla if it is not a juvenile. sent15: if the countertenor is not unattractive then the holothurian is non-Sikh thing that is not unattractive. sent16: that the fact that the heroine does dwarf warner and it is a kind of a strangler is wrong is right if it is not a juvenile. sent17: if the mouthbreeder is not sexual but it is a Azolla then the holothurian is not a Azolla. sent18: if that the countertenor is a kind of attractive a debater is incorrect the hag is not a kind of a debater. sent19: the wall is not a kind of a Stercorarius. sent20: something is not indecisive but it is a cover-up. sent21: something is not a sleeping if the fact that it is nonhierarchical and it is not a martyrdom is false. sent22: if there is something such that it is not a cat's-claw the fact that the countertenor is not a cat's-claw hold. sent23: there is something such that it does not uplift sailfish and is a Tay. sent24: the fact that the heroine is a strangler and is a Stercorarius does not hold. sent25: something is not unattractive if it is a strangler. sent26: the capiz is a strangler or is not Sikh or both if there exists something such that it is a strangler. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the countertenor is a kind of a blowtube but it is not unattractive.; assump1 -> int1: the countertenor is not unattractive.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the holothurian is not a Sikh and is not unattractive.; int2 -> int3: there are non-Sikh and attractive things.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the mouthbreeder is a strangler.; sent16 & sent12 -> int5: that the heroine dwarfs warner and it is a strangler is incorrect.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it does dwarf warner and it is a strangler is false.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the mouthbreeder is not a strangler.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the countertenor is a kind of a blowtube but it is not unattractive is false.; sent6 -> int10: if that the countertenor is a blowtube but it is not unattractive is not correct it is not a Azolla.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the countertenor is not a Azolla.; sent11 -> int12: the capiz is not a Stercorarius if it is not sexual.; __UNKNOWN__