there exists something such that if the fact that it does not accelerate Coke is not false then it waves bombing and it is not a Catalan.
sent1: there is something such that if it accelerates Coke it does wave bombing and it is not a Catalan. sent2: if the jargon is not Catalan it does whoop. sent3: there is something such that if it does not accelerate Coke that it does wave bombing and is a Catalan hold. sent4: there is something such that if it does not accelerate Coke it waves bombing. sent5: if the jargon does not accelerate Coke it does wave bombing. sent6: something is not non-blackbird and not a AA if it does not accelerate Coke. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a fabric then it is a kind of arthrosporic thing that does not canopy. sent8: the mammee is a goldenbush but it does not wave bombing if it is not Manichaean. sent9: something does wave bombing and is not a Catalan if it accelerates Coke. sent10: there is something such that if that it is not a coralwood hold then it is prosthetics thing that does not troll providence. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a noisiness then it is a kind of a Taracahitian and it is not a whoop. sent12: if the fact that the jargon does not accelerate Coke hold it does wave bombing and it is a kind of a Catalan. sent13: the jargon is a scombroid but it does not accelerate mammee if it is not poetics. sent14: something waves bombing and is Catalan if it does not accelerate Coke. sent15: if the Coke is not a kind of a heartwood then that it does wave bombing and it does not accelerate overexposure is not incorrect. sent16: the jargon does wave bombing and is not Catalan if it does accelerate Coke. sent17: if the fact that something does not accelerate Coke is true then it does wave bombing. sent18: that the jargon is a kind of regressive thing that does not wave bombing hold if it is not a kind of a meningism.
the Indiaman is blackbird and not a AA if the fact that it does not accelerate Coke is right.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not accelerate Coke is not false then it waves bombing and it is not a Catalan. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it accelerates Coke it does wave bombing and it is not a Catalan. sent2: if the jargon is not Catalan it does whoop. sent3: there is something such that if it does not accelerate Coke that it does wave bombing and is a Catalan hold. sent4: there is something such that if it does not accelerate Coke it waves bombing. sent5: if the jargon does not accelerate Coke it does wave bombing. sent6: something is not non-blackbird and not a AA if it does not accelerate Coke. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a fabric then it is a kind of arthrosporic thing that does not canopy. sent8: the mammee is a goldenbush but it does not wave bombing if it is not Manichaean. sent9: something does wave bombing and is not a Catalan if it accelerates Coke. sent10: there is something such that if that it is not a coralwood hold then it is prosthetics thing that does not troll providence. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a noisiness then it is a kind of a Taracahitian and it is not a whoop. sent12: if the fact that the jargon does not accelerate Coke hold it does wave bombing and it is a kind of a Catalan. sent13: the jargon is a scombroid but it does not accelerate mammee if it is not poetics. sent14: something waves bombing and is Catalan if it does not accelerate Coke. sent15: if the Coke is not a kind of a heartwood then that it does wave bombing and it does not accelerate overexposure is not incorrect. sent16: the jargon does wave bombing and is not Catalan if it does accelerate Coke. sent17: if the fact that something does not accelerate Coke is true then it does wave bombing. sent18: that the jargon is a kind of regressive thing that does not wave bombing hold if it is not a kind of a meningism. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__