the fact that that the scallop is pediatrics but it is not fissionable is not wrong is not correct.
sent1: if the fact that the refrigeration is Kiplingesque hold the commodity horripilates li. sent2: the commodity is not untranslatable if the Marxist is not alive. sent3: something is untranslatable if it does horripilate li. sent4: there is something such that it does horripilate li or it does not occidentalize Arcadian or both. sent5: the Marxist is not pediatrics if something is not a enjoyer and it is not alive. sent6: that the scallop is pediatrics is right if the Marxist is not a kind of a enjoyer. sent7: the commodity horripilates li if the refrigeration does culture. sent8: if the Marxist is not a enjoyer then the scallop is pediatrics and is not fissionable. sent9: the Marxist is not alive if the fact that it is a enjoyer is not wrong. sent10: the commodity is not fissionable. sent11: the refrigeration cultures and/or it is Kiplingesque. sent12: if something is a kind of a enjoyer then that it is pediatrics and nonfissionable is not right. sent13: if that the wear is agricultural is true the refrigeration is Kiplingesque. sent14: the commodity is not a enjoyer and it is not alive if there is something such that it is not untranslatable. sent15: if that the refrigeration is not alive is false the Marxist is a kind of a culture. sent16: if something that horripilates li does culture then it is not untranslatable. sent17: the scallop is pediatrics.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Marxist is a enjoyer hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Marxist is not alive.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the commodity is not untranslatable.; sent3 -> int3: if the commodity does horripilate li then it is untranslatable.; sent11 & sent7 & sent1 -> int4: the commodity does horripilate li.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the commodity is untranslatable hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Marxist is not a enjoyer.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the scallop is pediatrics but it is not fissionable is false.
sent16 -> int8: if the refrigeration does horripilate li and it is a culture it is not untranslatable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the scallop is pediatrics but it is not fissionable is not wrong is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the refrigeration is Kiplingesque hold the commodity horripilates li. sent2: the commodity is not untranslatable if the Marxist is not alive. sent3: something is untranslatable if it does horripilate li. sent4: there is something such that it does horripilate li or it does not occidentalize Arcadian or both. sent5: the Marxist is not pediatrics if something is not a enjoyer and it is not alive. sent6: that the scallop is pediatrics is right if the Marxist is not a kind of a enjoyer. sent7: the commodity horripilates li if the refrigeration does culture. sent8: if the Marxist is not a enjoyer then the scallop is pediatrics and is not fissionable. sent9: the Marxist is not alive if the fact that it is a enjoyer is not wrong. sent10: the commodity is not fissionable. sent11: the refrigeration cultures and/or it is Kiplingesque. sent12: if something is a kind of a enjoyer then that it is pediatrics and nonfissionable is not right. sent13: if that the wear is agricultural is true the refrigeration is Kiplingesque. sent14: the commodity is not a enjoyer and it is not alive if there is something such that it is not untranslatable. sent15: if that the refrigeration is not alive is false the Marxist is a kind of a culture. sent16: if something that horripilates li does culture then it is not untranslatable. sent17: the scallop is pediatrics. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Marxist is a enjoyer hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Marxist is not alive.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the commodity is not untranslatable.; sent3 -> int3: if the commodity does horripilate li then it is untranslatable.; sent11 & sent7 & sent1 -> int4: the commodity does horripilate li.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the commodity is untranslatable hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Marxist is not a enjoyer.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__