the heroicsness does not occur.
sent1: the freelanceness does not occur. sent2: if the ECCM happens the heroics happens. sent3: the measuring minibar does not occur and the integumentariness does not occur if the disclosure does not occur. sent4: that the throne happens is prevented by that the crawl does not occur. sent5: the mistral does not occur if the measuring minibar does not occur and the integumentariness does not occur. sent6: that the ECCM occurs is triggered by the photographicness. sent7: if the mistral does not occur the ECCM does not occur and the hyperemicness does not occur. sent8: the illiterate does not occur and the throning does not occur if the crawl does not occur. sent9: the throning does not occur. sent10: if the illiterate does not occur the photographicness occurs. sent11: the fact that the survey does not occur is not wrong if the industrialness does not occur. sent12: the freelancing does not occur and the crawling does not occur if the throning occurs. sent13: that the freelanceness happens is brought about by that the crawl happens. sent14: if the surveying does not occur the disclosure does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crawling happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the freelanceness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the crawl does not occur.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the illiterateness does not occur and the throne does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the illiterateness does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the photographicness happens.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the ECCM occurs.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the heroicsness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the heroicsness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the freelanceness does not occur. sent2: if the ECCM happens the heroics happens. sent3: the measuring minibar does not occur and the integumentariness does not occur if the disclosure does not occur. sent4: that the throne happens is prevented by that the crawl does not occur. sent5: the mistral does not occur if the measuring minibar does not occur and the integumentariness does not occur. sent6: that the ECCM occurs is triggered by the photographicness. sent7: if the mistral does not occur the ECCM does not occur and the hyperemicness does not occur. sent8: the illiterate does not occur and the throning does not occur if the crawl does not occur. sent9: the throning does not occur. sent10: if the illiterate does not occur the photographicness occurs. sent11: the fact that the survey does not occur is not wrong if the industrialness does not occur. sent12: the freelancing does not occur and the crawling does not occur if the throning occurs. sent13: that the freelanceness happens is brought about by that the crawl happens. sent14: if the surveying does not occur the disclosure does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crawling happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the freelanceness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the crawl does not occur.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the illiterateness does not occur and the throne does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the illiterateness does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the photographicness happens.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the ECCM occurs.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__