the biopsy happens.
sent1: both the bettering and the selfness occurs. sent2: both the inauguralness and the fleshing oarsmanship happens. sent3: both the softness and the grooving happens. sent4: if the discreetness occurs then the funeral occurs. sent5: the powwow or the non-betteringness or both happens if the cirrus occurs. sent6: both the rummy and the idling happens. sent7: if the funeral happens the birefringentness occurs. sent8: the regressing and the discreetness occurs. sent9: the cirrus does not occur if the fact that both the mythologizing telescoped and the cirrus occurs does not hold. sent10: if the powwow does not occur then that the birefringentness occurs and the biopsy does not occur does not hold. sent11: the fact that the mythologizing telescoped happens and the cirrus occurs is not true. sent12: that the biopsy does not occur is caused by that the regressing happens but the discreetness does not occur. sent13: the Hebraicness does not occur. sent14: that the powwowing happens is prevented by that the betteringness but not the cirrus occurs.
sent8 -> int1: that the discreetness occurs is not wrong.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the funeral happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the birefringentness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biopsy does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the birefringentness but not the biopsy happens.; sent1 -> int5: the bettering occurs.; sent9 & sent11 -> int6: the cirrus does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bettering happens but the cirrus does not occur.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the powwowing does not occur is not incorrect.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the birefringentness happens and the biopsy does not occur does not hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the biopsy does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the biopsy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the bettering and the selfness occurs. sent2: both the inauguralness and the fleshing oarsmanship happens. sent3: both the softness and the grooving happens. sent4: if the discreetness occurs then the funeral occurs. sent5: the powwow or the non-betteringness or both happens if the cirrus occurs. sent6: both the rummy and the idling happens. sent7: if the funeral happens the birefringentness occurs. sent8: the regressing and the discreetness occurs. sent9: the cirrus does not occur if the fact that both the mythologizing telescoped and the cirrus occurs does not hold. sent10: if the powwow does not occur then that the birefringentness occurs and the biopsy does not occur does not hold. sent11: the fact that the mythologizing telescoped happens and the cirrus occurs is not true. sent12: that the biopsy does not occur is caused by that the regressing happens but the discreetness does not occur. sent13: the Hebraicness does not occur. sent14: that the powwowing happens is prevented by that the betteringness but not the cirrus occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: that the discreetness occurs is not wrong.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the funeral happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the birefringentness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biopsy does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the birefringentness but not the biopsy happens.; sent1 -> int5: the bettering occurs.; sent9 & sent11 -> int6: the cirrus does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bettering happens but the cirrus does not occur.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the powwowing does not occur is not incorrect.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the birefringentness happens and the biopsy does not occur does not hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__