the synchrotron is a kind of a MEDLINE.
sent1: the sleeping is a reluctance or it does not twine sleeping or both if the facade does twine moroseness. sent2: if that something is not a reluctance or clamatorial or both is wrong then that it does not twine sleeping is true. sent3: if the fact that the splinter does not twine sleeping and does not twine moroseness is not correct then the synchrotron is a MEDLINE. sent4: everything is not a saddlebag. sent5: there exists nothing such that it does not jostle and/or it is not clamatorial. sent6: if something is a burlesque but not a Light then it is a kind of a reluctance. sent7: the facade is burlesque and is not a kind of a Light if the sleeping twines sleeping. sent8: if that the splinter is not a kind of a reluctance and/or it is a Light does not hold it does not twine sleeping. sent9: if the fact that the sleeping does not twine sleeping hold that the splinter twine sleeping but it does not twine moroseness does not hold. sent10: that the fact that the facade is both a Light and not a jostle does not hold if the sleeping is not a Light is right. sent11: that something is non-clamatorial but it is a kind of a jostle is not correct if it is not a saddlebag. sent12: the fact that the facade is a burlesque but not clamatorial is wrong if the splinter is not a kind of a burlesque. sent13: everything is clamatorial. sent14: the sleeping is not a Light. sent15: if the sleeping does not twine sleeping the fact that the splinter does not twine sleeping but it does twine moroseness is not true. sent16: the fact that the splinter does not twine sleeping and does not twine moroseness is wrong if the sleeping does not twine sleeping. sent17: something is not a kind of a reluctance if the fact that it either is not a jostle or is not clamatorial or both is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sleeping twines sleeping.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the facade is burlesque thing that is not a kind of a Light.; sent6 -> int2: if the facade is a burlesque that is not a kind of a Light then it is a reluctance.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the facade is a kind of a reluctance.; sent17 -> int4: the facade is not a reluctance if that either it does not jostle or it is not clamatorial or both is wrong.; sent5 -> int5: that the facade is either not a jostle or not clamatorial or both is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the facade is not a kind of a reluctance.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the sleeping does not twine sleeping.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the fact that the splinter does not twine sleeping and it does not twine moroseness does not hold.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the synchrotron is not a MEDLINE.
sent11 -> int10: if the facade is not a kind of a saddlebag that it is not clamatorial but a jostle is not correct.; sent4 -> int11: the facade is not a saddlebag.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the facade is not clamatorial but it is a kind of a jostle is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the synchrotron is a kind of a MEDLINE. ; $context$ = sent1: the sleeping is a reluctance or it does not twine sleeping or both if the facade does twine moroseness. sent2: if that something is not a reluctance or clamatorial or both is wrong then that it does not twine sleeping is true. sent3: if the fact that the splinter does not twine sleeping and does not twine moroseness is not correct then the synchrotron is a MEDLINE. sent4: everything is not a saddlebag. sent5: there exists nothing such that it does not jostle and/or it is not clamatorial. sent6: if something is a burlesque but not a Light then it is a kind of a reluctance. sent7: the facade is burlesque and is not a kind of a Light if the sleeping twines sleeping. sent8: if that the splinter is not a kind of a reluctance and/or it is a Light does not hold it does not twine sleeping. sent9: if the fact that the sleeping does not twine sleeping hold that the splinter twine sleeping but it does not twine moroseness does not hold. sent10: that the fact that the facade is both a Light and not a jostle does not hold if the sleeping is not a Light is right. sent11: that something is non-clamatorial but it is a kind of a jostle is not correct if it is not a saddlebag. sent12: the fact that the facade is a burlesque but not clamatorial is wrong if the splinter is not a kind of a burlesque. sent13: everything is clamatorial. sent14: the sleeping is not a Light. sent15: if the sleeping does not twine sleeping the fact that the splinter does not twine sleeping but it does twine moroseness is not true. sent16: the fact that the splinter does not twine sleeping and does not twine moroseness is wrong if the sleeping does not twine sleeping. sent17: something is not a kind of a reluctance if the fact that it either is not a jostle or is not clamatorial or both is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sleeping twines sleeping.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the facade is burlesque thing that is not a kind of a Light.; sent6 -> int2: if the facade is a burlesque that is not a kind of a Light then it is a reluctance.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the facade is a kind of a reluctance.; sent17 -> int4: the facade is not a reluctance if that either it does not jostle or it is not clamatorial or both is wrong.; sent5 -> int5: that the facade is either not a jostle or not clamatorial or both is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the facade is not a kind of a reluctance.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the sleeping does not twine sleeping.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the fact that the splinter does not twine sleeping and it does not twine moroseness does not hold.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__