the inspecting happens.
sent1: the Kabbalism and the spousalness occurs. sent2: that the spousalness does not occur leads to that the unloosing parsley and the inspecting occurs. sent3: that the inspecting occurs prevents that the Kabbalism occurs. sent4: the investing relic and the Kabbalism occurs if the ampullarness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inspecting happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Kabbalism does not occur.; sent1 -> int2: the Kabbalism occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the investing relic occurs and the unloosing parsley happens is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the inspecting happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the Kabbalism and the spousalness occurs. sent2: that the spousalness does not occur leads to that the unloosing parsley and the inspecting occurs. sent3: that the inspecting occurs prevents that the Kabbalism occurs. sent4: the investing relic and the Kabbalism occurs if the ampullarness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inspecting happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Kabbalism does not occur.; sent1 -> int2: the Kabbalism occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__