the Teflon either is not attentive or housekeeps mugshot or both.
sent1: the coatrack is high-rise if the Chile does relace Kennelly. sent2: the coatrack is cardiologic if it is not inattentive. sent3: the Teflon is lossy. sent4: the Teflon is a high-rise. sent5: the Chile is a kind of a high-rise. sent6: something that is cardiologic is a watchmaker. sent7: the Teflon is a kind of a watchmaker. sent8: something that is attentive does relace Kennelly. sent9: if the coatrack housekeeps shipway it is cardiologic. sent10: there is something such that it is both a watchmaker and not cardiologic. sent11: the coatrack is outward and housekeeps shipway. sent12: the Chile is stoloniferous and lossy. sent13: the fact that that the Chile is not a kind of a ladder hold does not hold if it is attentive. sent14: either the Teflon is not attentive or it housekeeps mugshot or both if the size is not attentive. sent15: either the Chile is not outward or it is lossy or both. sent16: the thromboplastin is a kind of a watchmaker and it is a monandry. sent17: if something is a watchmaker it is stoloniferous. sent18: the coatrack is spondaic. sent19: the coatrack is outward if it is attentive. sent20: the Chile is a ramus and it is a arteriogram. sent21: if something is not a high-rise it is lossy and it relaces Kennelly. sent22: the coatrack is stoloniferous. sent23: the coatrack housekeeps mugshot. sent24: if the coatrack is a kind of a watchmaker and it is a high-rise the size is not attentive. sent25: the Teflon predicates and is lossy. sent26: if something is lossy then the Chile is not non-stoloniferous. sent27: something relaces Kennelly if it is lossy. sent28: the Chile is high-rise if the fact that it is stoloniferous hold.
sent12 -> int1: the Chile is lossy.; sent27 -> int2: the Chile relaces Kennelly if it is lossy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Chile does relace Kennelly.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the coatrack is high-rise.; sent6 -> int5: the coatrack is a watchmaker if it is cardiologic.; sent11 -> int6: that the coatrack does housekeep shipway is not wrong.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the coatrack is cardiologic.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the coatrack is a kind of a watchmaker is right.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the coatrack is a watchmaker and is a kind of a high-rise.; int9 & sent24 -> int10: the size is not attentive.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
that the Teflon is not attentive or housekeeps mugshot or both is false.
sent21 -> int11: if that the coatrack is not a high-rise is not wrong then it is lossy and it does relace Kennelly.;
$hypothesis$ = the Teflon either is not attentive or housekeeps mugshot or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the coatrack is high-rise if the Chile does relace Kennelly. sent2: the coatrack is cardiologic if it is not inattentive. sent3: the Teflon is lossy. sent4: the Teflon is a high-rise. sent5: the Chile is a kind of a high-rise. sent6: something that is cardiologic is a watchmaker. sent7: the Teflon is a kind of a watchmaker. sent8: something that is attentive does relace Kennelly. sent9: if the coatrack housekeeps shipway it is cardiologic. sent10: there is something such that it is both a watchmaker and not cardiologic. sent11: the coatrack is outward and housekeeps shipway. sent12: the Chile is stoloniferous and lossy. sent13: the fact that that the Chile is not a kind of a ladder hold does not hold if it is attentive. sent14: either the Teflon is not attentive or it housekeeps mugshot or both if the size is not attentive. sent15: either the Chile is not outward or it is lossy or both. sent16: the thromboplastin is a kind of a watchmaker and it is a monandry. sent17: if something is a watchmaker it is stoloniferous. sent18: the coatrack is spondaic. sent19: the coatrack is outward if it is attentive. sent20: the Chile is a ramus and it is a arteriogram. sent21: if something is not a high-rise it is lossy and it relaces Kennelly. sent22: the coatrack is stoloniferous. sent23: the coatrack housekeeps mugshot. sent24: if the coatrack is a kind of a watchmaker and it is a high-rise the size is not attentive. sent25: the Teflon predicates and is lossy. sent26: if something is lossy then the Chile is not non-stoloniferous. sent27: something relaces Kennelly if it is lossy. sent28: the Chile is high-rise if the fact that it is stoloniferous hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the Chile is lossy.; sent27 -> int2: the Chile relaces Kennelly if it is lossy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Chile does relace Kennelly.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the coatrack is high-rise.; sent6 -> int5: the coatrack is a watchmaker if it is cardiologic.; sent11 -> int6: that the coatrack does housekeep shipway is not wrong.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the coatrack is cardiologic.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the coatrack is a kind of a watchmaker is right.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the coatrack is a watchmaker and is a kind of a high-rise.; int9 & sent24 -> int10: the size is not attentive.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__