the vapor does not about-face.
sent1: if the brassard does vault adenovirus or it is not a about-face or both then the vapor is not non-civilian. sent2: if the authoritarian either is a da'wah or does not vault adenovirus or both that the brassard is a civilian is true. sent3: that the adenovirus is a kind of a back hold. sent4: the authoritarian either is a da'wah or is not a about-face or both. sent5: the authoritarian does not vault adenovirus. sent6: either the authoritarian is a kind of a da'wah or it vaults adenovirus or both. sent7: the Jacobs is a civilian. sent8: the fact that the fact that something is non-civilian thing that vaults adenovirus is incorrect if it does purify Musset is right. sent9: a civilian is a da'wah. sent10: The adenovirus does not vault authoritarian. sent11: if the brassard vaults adenovirus or it is not a da'wah or both then that the authoritarian is a kind of a civilian is correct. sent12: something does not about-face if that it is a about-face and it does not vault adenovirus is not right. sent13: if the brassard is civilian the vapor does about-face. sent14: if the adenovirus is a back it is a kind of a countenance. sent15: if the authoritarian is civilian the brassard vaults adenovirus. sent16: if the vapor is a da'wah then the fact that it does about-face and it does not vault adenovirus is wrong. sent17: if the brassard purifies bonsai the authoritarian purifies Musset.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the authoritarian is a da'wah and/or it does not vault adenovirus is right.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the brassard is a civilian.; sent13 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the vapor is not a about-face.
sent12 -> int3: if the fact that the vapor is a kind of a about-face that does not vault adenovirus does not hold it does not about-face.; sent9 -> int4: if the vapor is civilian it is a da'wah.;
$hypothesis$ = the vapor does not about-face. ; $context$ = sent1: if the brassard does vault adenovirus or it is not a about-face or both then the vapor is not non-civilian. sent2: if the authoritarian either is a da'wah or does not vault adenovirus or both that the brassard is a civilian is true. sent3: that the adenovirus is a kind of a back hold. sent4: the authoritarian either is a da'wah or is not a about-face or both. sent5: the authoritarian does not vault adenovirus. sent6: either the authoritarian is a kind of a da'wah or it vaults adenovirus or both. sent7: the Jacobs is a civilian. sent8: the fact that the fact that something is non-civilian thing that vaults adenovirus is incorrect if it does purify Musset is right. sent9: a civilian is a da'wah. sent10: The adenovirus does not vault authoritarian. sent11: if the brassard vaults adenovirus or it is not a da'wah or both then that the authoritarian is a kind of a civilian is correct. sent12: something does not about-face if that it is a about-face and it does not vault adenovirus is not right. sent13: if the brassard is civilian the vapor does about-face. sent14: if the adenovirus is a back it is a kind of a countenance. sent15: if the authoritarian is civilian the brassard vaults adenovirus. sent16: if the vapor is a da'wah then the fact that it does about-face and it does not vault adenovirus is wrong. sent17: if the brassard purifies bonsai the authoritarian purifies Musset. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the authoritarian is a da'wah and/or it does not vault adenovirus is right.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the brassard is a civilian.; sent13 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__