the night-line is not returnable and it does not border granola.
sent1: that the night-line does not detrain Malthusian and it is not analogous is not true if it is not returnable. sent2: the Malthusian is analogous. sent3: if there exists something such that it detrains Malthusian and/or it is not nonreturnable then the night-line is non-analogous. sent4: the Malthusian borders granola. sent5: if something is not analogous then that it does not detrain Malthusian and it is not a Chorizema is wrong. sent6: the fact that something does not forage candied but it is politic does not hold if it is not a kind of a Latin. sent7: the night-line does not detrain Malthusian if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Chorizema or it is analogous or both. sent8: that the Malthusian is not a Latin and not Jeffersonian is not right. sent9: that the Malthusian does not border granola and is not a Chorizema is false. sent10: the fact that the fact that the Malthusian does not heel azurite and it does not border granola does not hold is not incorrect. sent11: the fact that the night-line is nonreturnable and it is not deductible is wrong. sent12: if something is not a Medicaid the fact that it is not a BLT and is not a yellowtail is wrong. sent13: the fact that something borders viper but it does not forage temperature is not correct if it is not a kind of a urate. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of non-returnable thing that does not border granola does not hold if it does not detrain Malthusian. sent15: if the Malthusian does not border granola then that it is returnable and is not analogous is not true. sent16: that something is auscultatory and does not forage temperature does not hold if it does not detrain partridge. sent17: the night-line is not a kind of a backing. sent18: the fact that something is non-social thing that does detrain FTC does not hold if it is non-Colombian. sent19: the night-line is not a Chorizema if something is a Latin. sent20: the fact that the Malthusian does not detrain Malthusian and it is not a Chorizema is not right if that it does not border granola hold. sent21: the granola does not border granola. sent22: if the night-line is not analogous the fact that it does not border granola and is a Chorizema is false.
sent2 -> int1: the Malthusian is a Chorizema or it is analogous or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a Chorizema and/or it is analogous.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the night-line does not detrain Malthusian.; sent14 -> int4: if the night-line does not detrain Malthusian the fact that it is not returnable and it does not border granola is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the night-line is nonreturnable and does not border granola.
sent5 -> int5: the fact that the Malthusian does not detrain Malthusian and it is not a Chorizema is false if it is not analogous.;
$hypothesis$ = the night-line is not returnable and it does not border granola. ; $context$ = sent1: that the night-line does not detrain Malthusian and it is not analogous is not true if it is not returnable. sent2: the Malthusian is analogous. sent3: if there exists something such that it detrains Malthusian and/or it is not nonreturnable then the night-line is non-analogous. sent4: the Malthusian borders granola. sent5: if something is not analogous then that it does not detrain Malthusian and it is not a Chorizema is wrong. sent6: the fact that something does not forage candied but it is politic does not hold if it is not a kind of a Latin. sent7: the night-line does not detrain Malthusian if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Chorizema or it is analogous or both. sent8: that the Malthusian is not a Latin and not Jeffersonian is not right. sent9: that the Malthusian does not border granola and is not a Chorizema is false. sent10: the fact that the fact that the Malthusian does not heel azurite and it does not border granola does not hold is not incorrect. sent11: the fact that the night-line is nonreturnable and it is not deductible is wrong. sent12: if something is not a Medicaid the fact that it is not a BLT and is not a yellowtail is wrong. sent13: the fact that something borders viper but it does not forage temperature is not correct if it is not a kind of a urate. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of non-returnable thing that does not border granola does not hold if it does not detrain Malthusian. sent15: if the Malthusian does not border granola then that it is returnable and is not analogous is not true. sent16: that something is auscultatory and does not forage temperature does not hold if it does not detrain partridge. sent17: the night-line is not a kind of a backing. sent18: the fact that something is non-social thing that does detrain FTC does not hold if it is non-Colombian. sent19: the night-line is not a Chorizema if something is a Latin. sent20: the fact that the Malthusian does not detrain Malthusian and it is not a Chorizema is not right if that it does not border granola hold. sent21: the granola does not border granola. sent22: if the night-line is not analogous the fact that it does not border granola and is a Chorizema is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the Malthusian is a Chorizema or it is analogous or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a Chorizema and/or it is analogous.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the night-line does not detrain Malthusian.; sent14 -> int4: if the night-line does not detrain Malthusian the fact that it is not returnable and it does not border granola is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__