the rumble occurs.
sent1: the intermission does not occur if the fact that not the rumbling but the coreferentialness happens is not correct. sent2: if the tweezing fireman occurs then the augiticness occurs. sent3: that the tweezing fireman does not occur but the augiticness occurs brings about the plain. sent4: the augiticness does not occur. sent5: the intermission does not occur but the coreferentialness occurs if the tweezing fireman does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tweezing fireman occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the augiticness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the tweezing fireman does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the intermission does not occur but the coreferentialness happens.; int4 -> int5: the coreferentialness happens.;
the plain happens.
$hypothesis$ = the rumble occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the intermission does not occur if the fact that not the rumbling but the coreferentialness happens is not correct. sent2: if the tweezing fireman occurs then the augiticness occurs. sent3: that the tweezing fireman does not occur but the augiticness occurs brings about the plain. sent4: the augiticness does not occur. sent5: the intermission does not occur but the coreferentialness occurs if the tweezing fireman does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tweezing fireman occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the augiticness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the tweezing fireman does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the intermission does not occur but the coreferentialness happens.; int4 -> int5: the coreferentialness happens.; __UNKNOWN__