the fact that the pseudocarp either does not tender or is a Ostrogoth or both is not false.
sent1: the fact that the newsreader is both not a chicory and a concomitance is not correct if the banteng is a chicory. sent2: if the fact that the catsup is a amiodarone is right the fact that the scientist flabbergasts succulence hold. sent3: the catsup is a tender if the pseudocarp is a groove. sent4: the fact that the banteng is a kind of a chicory is right if the tabard is a amiodarone. sent5: the fact that the newsreader is a Antony is not wrong. sent6: if the scientist flabbergasts succulence and it is unfair then the fact that the pseudocarp is not a tender is right. sent7: if the scientist is a kind of a chicory the banteng is an instruction. sent8: if the tabard is not a amiodarone then the catsup is a amiodarone and/or it is a groove. sent9: the banteng does not tender. sent10: everything is unfair and it is an instruction. sent11: the newsreader is not a chicory and is a concomitance if it is a Antony.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tabard is a amiodarone.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the banteng is a chicory.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the newsreader is not a chicory but it is a kind of a concomitance is not wrong is incorrect.; sent11 & sent5 -> int3: the newsreader is not a chicory but it is a concomitance.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the tabard is not a kind of a amiodarone is not false.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: either the catsup is a amiodarone or it does groove or both.; sent10 -> int7: the scientist is unfair and is an instruction.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the scientist is unfair is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pseudocarp either does not tender or is a Ostrogoth or both is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the newsreader is both not a chicory and a concomitance is not correct if the banteng is a chicory. sent2: if the fact that the catsup is a amiodarone is right the fact that the scientist flabbergasts succulence hold. sent3: the catsup is a tender if the pseudocarp is a groove. sent4: the fact that the banteng is a kind of a chicory is right if the tabard is a amiodarone. sent5: the fact that the newsreader is a Antony is not wrong. sent6: if the scientist flabbergasts succulence and it is unfair then the fact that the pseudocarp is not a tender is right. sent7: if the scientist is a kind of a chicory the banteng is an instruction. sent8: if the tabard is not a amiodarone then the catsup is a amiodarone and/or it is a groove. sent9: the banteng does not tender. sent10: everything is unfair and it is an instruction. sent11: the newsreader is not a chicory and is a concomitance if it is a Antony. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tabard is a amiodarone.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the banteng is a chicory.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the newsreader is not a chicory but it is a kind of a concomitance is not wrong is incorrect.; sent11 & sent5 -> int3: the newsreader is not a chicory but it is a concomitance.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the tabard is not a kind of a amiodarone is not false.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: either the catsup is a amiodarone or it does groove or both.; sent10 -> int7: the scientist is unfair and is an instruction.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the scientist is unfair is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__