that there is something such that if it is post-communist the fact that it is diatomic and it is not a tranylcypromine is not true does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a Halakah is not wrong that it is both a Cherbourg and not a Pagellus is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is post-communist hold that the fact that it is diatomic and it is a kind of a tranylcypromine is not incorrect is not true. sent3: if something is post-communist then it is both diatomic and not a tranylcypromine. sent4: that something is diatomic but not a tranylcypromine is not right if it is post-communist. sent5: if the birefringence is post-communist it is diatomic and it is not a kind of a tranylcypromine. sent6: if the birefringence is post-communist the fact that it is both diatomic and a tranylcypromine does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is post-communist then it is diatomic and it is not a tranylcypromine. sent8: if something is innocuous then that it is dipolar thing that does not resect tailoring is incorrect. sent9: that something is a kind of diatomic thing that is a tranylcypromine does not hold if it is post-communist.
sent4 -> int1: if the birefringence is post-communist that it is diatomic and not a tranylcypromine is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is post-communist the fact that it is diatomic and it is not a tranylcypromine is not true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a Halakah is not wrong that it is both a Cherbourg and not a Pagellus is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is post-communist hold that the fact that it is diatomic and it is a kind of a tranylcypromine is not incorrect is not true. sent3: if something is post-communist then it is both diatomic and not a tranylcypromine. sent4: that something is diatomic but not a tranylcypromine is not right if it is post-communist. sent5: if the birefringence is post-communist it is diatomic and it is not a kind of a tranylcypromine. sent6: if the birefringence is post-communist the fact that it is both diatomic and a tranylcypromine does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is post-communist then it is diatomic and it is not a tranylcypromine. sent8: if something is innocuous then that it is dipolar thing that does not resect tailoring is incorrect. sent9: that something is a kind of diatomic thing that is a tranylcypromine does not hold if it is post-communist. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the birefringence is post-communist that it is diatomic and not a tranylcypromine is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__