the Ab does trace vermiculation.
sent1: the vermiculation is astrocytic or it does queen text or both. sent2: the fugitive is a Raphus if the Ab does not trace vermiculation. sent3: if the fugitive does queen text the vermiculation unyokes or does not trace vermiculation or both. sent4: if the first-nighter is not a linkage it is exteroceptive. sent5: the fugitive is a kind of a Raphus. sent6: the fugitive is not a linkage if the first-nighter is a Raphus. sent7: if the Ab does not trace vermiculation the fugitive does not unyoke and is a Raphus. sent8: the brant does not queen text. sent9: either the vermiculation is astrocytic or it does queen text or both if the fugitive is chancrous. sent10: the vermiculation does queen text if it is non-exteroceptive a linkage. sent11: if the vermiculation is astrocytic and/or it does not queen text the first-nighter is not prodromal. sent12: if the fugitive does queen text but it is not prodromal the fact that the Ab does queen text hold. sent13: the vermiculation does not unyoke. sent14: the fact that the partridgeberry queens text is not incorrect. sent15: the fact that the first-nighter is not a linkage is right if it is not prodromal. sent16: if something does not unyoke and is a Raphus it is chancrous. sent17: the first-nighter does not trace vermiculation if the Ab is not exteroceptive. sent18: the fact that the hassock does not trace vermiculation is not wrong. sent19: something that does queen text is non-chancrous thing that does not trace vermiculation. sent20: the first-nighter does not trace vermiculation. sent21: the first-nighter is not prodromal if that the vermiculation does queen text is false. sent22: the first-nighter is non-exteroceptive. sent23: if the first-nighter is prodromal and it is chancrous then it is a Raphus. sent24: the vermiculation is not a kind of a Raphus if the fugitive is astrocytic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ab does not trace vermiculation.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fugitive does not unyoke and is a Raphus.; sent16 -> int2: the fugitive is chancrous if it does not unyoke and is a Raphus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fugitive is chancrous.;
the Ab does not trace vermiculation.
sent19 -> int4: the Ab is non-chancrous thing that does not trace vermiculation if it does queen text.;
$hypothesis$ = the Ab does trace vermiculation. ; $context$ = sent1: the vermiculation is astrocytic or it does queen text or both. sent2: the fugitive is a Raphus if the Ab does not trace vermiculation. sent3: if the fugitive does queen text the vermiculation unyokes or does not trace vermiculation or both. sent4: if the first-nighter is not a linkage it is exteroceptive. sent5: the fugitive is a kind of a Raphus. sent6: the fugitive is not a linkage if the first-nighter is a Raphus. sent7: if the Ab does not trace vermiculation the fugitive does not unyoke and is a Raphus. sent8: the brant does not queen text. sent9: either the vermiculation is astrocytic or it does queen text or both if the fugitive is chancrous. sent10: the vermiculation does queen text if it is non-exteroceptive a linkage. sent11: if the vermiculation is astrocytic and/or it does not queen text the first-nighter is not prodromal. sent12: if the fugitive does queen text but it is not prodromal the fact that the Ab does queen text hold. sent13: the vermiculation does not unyoke. sent14: the fact that the partridgeberry queens text is not incorrect. sent15: the fact that the first-nighter is not a linkage is right if it is not prodromal. sent16: if something does not unyoke and is a Raphus it is chancrous. sent17: the first-nighter does not trace vermiculation if the Ab is not exteroceptive. sent18: the fact that the hassock does not trace vermiculation is not wrong. sent19: something that does queen text is non-chancrous thing that does not trace vermiculation. sent20: the first-nighter does not trace vermiculation. sent21: the first-nighter is not prodromal if that the vermiculation does queen text is false. sent22: the first-nighter is non-exteroceptive. sent23: if the first-nighter is prodromal and it is chancrous then it is a Raphus. sent24: the vermiculation is not a kind of a Raphus if the fugitive is astrocytic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ab does not trace vermiculation.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fugitive does not unyoke and is a Raphus.; sent16 -> int2: the fugitive is chancrous if it does not unyoke and is a Raphus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fugitive is chancrous.; __UNKNOWN__