that the restfulness but not the straining insufflation happens does not hold.
sent1: the foreignness does not occur if the fact that both the formula and the foreignness happens is false. sent2: that both the non-proprioceptiveness and the non-.45-caliberness happens is brought about by that the straining overbid does not occur. sent3: if either the mioticness does not occur or the obviation does not occur or both then that the straining insufflation does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the thermoplasticness does not occur then the fact that that the straining Tarheel does not occur but the miotic happens hold does not hold. sent5: both the foreignness and the assault occurs. sent6: if the mioticness and the thermoplasticness happens then the assault does not occur. sent7: the non-thermoplasticness is brought about by that not the obviation but the assault occurs. sent8: the fact that the straining Tarheel happens is right if the fact that not the straining Tarheel but the mioticness occurs is incorrect. sent9: the foreignness occurs. sent10: the miotic does not occur or the obviation happens or both. sent11: both the straining insufflation and the restfulness occurs if the foreignness does not occur. sent12: the restfulness happens. sent13: the fact that the formula occurs and the foreignness occurs does not hold if the fact that the proprioceptiveness does not occur is right. sent14: the fact that the thermoplasticness happens hold. sent15: if the obviation does not occur the fact that the straining insufflation does not occur hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mioticness occurs.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the mioticness happens and the thermoplastic happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the assault does not occur.; sent5 -> int3: the assault happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the mioticness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: that either the mioticness does not occur or the obviation does not occur or both is right.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the straining insufflation does not occur.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the straining Tarheel occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the restfulness but not the straining insufflation happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the foreignness does not occur if the fact that both the formula and the foreignness happens is false. sent2: that both the non-proprioceptiveness and the non-.45-caliberness happens is brought about by that the straining overbid does not occur. sent3: if either the mioticness does not occur or the obviation does not occur or both then that the straining insufflation does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the thermoplasticness does not occur then the fact that that the straining Tarheel does not occur but the miotic happens hold does not hold. sent5: both the foreignness and the assault occurs. sent6: if the mioticness and the thermoplasticness happens then the assault does not occur. sent7: the non-thermoplasticness is brought about by that not the obviation but the assault occurs. sent8: the fact that the straining Tarheel happens is right if the fact that not the straining Tarheel but the mioticness occurs is incorrect. sent9: the foreignness occurs. sent10: the miotic does not occur or the obviation happens or both. sent11: both the straining insufflation and the restfulness occurs if the foreignness does not occur. sent12: the restfulness happens. sent13: the fact that the formula occurs and the foreignness occurs does not hold if the fact that the proprioceptiveness does not occur is right. sent14: the fact that the thermoplasticness happens hold. sent15: if the obviation does not occur the fact that the straining insufflation does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mioticness occurs.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the mioticness happens and the thermoplastic happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the assault does not occur.; sent5 -> int3: the assault happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the mioticness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: that either the mioticness does not occur or the obviation does not occur or both is right.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the straining insufflation does not occur.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__