the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a hiatus the fact that it is not annexational and it is not unexportable is wrong is correct.
sent1: that something is not concretistic and it is not a kind of a penitent is not true if it does not thrust exteroceptor. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a hiatus then that it is annexational and it is not unexportable is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a hiatus the fact that it is a kind of non-annexational thing that is unexportable is incorrect. sent4: the parang is not annexational and it is not unexportable if it is not a hiatus. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a hiatus then the fact that it is not annexational and it is not unexportable does not hold. sent6: the fact that the parang does not thrust exteroceptor and is not apicultural is not right if it does not thrust breakable. sent7: the fact that the parang is not annexational and not unexportable does not hold if it is not a hiatus. sent8: that that the parang is the numbness and not extracellular is not right if the parang is not Wiccan is not wrong. sent9: if the breakable does blunt parang then the fact that it is not annexational but non-rhombic is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Pyramid that it is not high-tension and it does not thrust dumping is not right.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Humulin is not concretistic and it is not a penitent does not hold if it does not thrust exteroceptor.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a hiatus the fact that it is not annexational and it is not unexportable is wrong is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not concretistic and it is not a kind of a penitent is not true if it does not thrust exteroceptor. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a hiatus then that it is annexational and it is not unexportable is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a hiatus the fact that it is a kind of non-annexational thing that is unexportable is incorrect. sent4: the parang is not annexational and it is not unexportable if it is not a hiatus. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a hiatus then the fact that it is not annexational and it is not unexportable does not hold. sent6: the fact that the parang does not thrust exteroceptor and is not apicultural is not right if it does not thrust breakable. sent7: the fact that the parang is not annexational and not unexportable does not hold if it is not a hiatus. sent8: that that the parang is the numbness and not extracellular is not right if the parang is not Wiccan is not wrong. sent9: if the breakable does blunt parang then the fact that it is not annexational but non-rhombic is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Pyramid that it is not high-tension and it does not thrust dumping is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__