the strafer does not single gladiolus.
sent1: the fact that the invalidator is not a Chaldean and it does not single pakchoi is not right. sent2: everything does not tat and it is not a Chaldean. sent3: the defeatist is inorganic. sent4: if the defeatist is inorganic then the mammee does not single pakchoi and/or it does not stroke ergodicity. sent5: everything is a kind of an endemic and patterns sulkiness. sent6: the fact that the strafer does not single pakchoi hold if the mammee does not single pakchoi. sent7: if the fact that the invalidator does not tat but it is a Chaldean is right the strafer is not a tenpin. sent8: the mammee does not single pakchoi or it is not a tenpin or both if the strafer is inorganic. sent9: if the mammee does not single pakchoi then that it does single gladiolus and is a tenpin is false. sent10: the strafer is not a tenpin if the invalidator does not tat and is not Chaldean. sent11: the strafer does not single pakchoi if the mammee does not stroke ergodicity. sent12: the fact that the invalidator is organic and not a Chaldean is wrong. sent13: if something does stroke ergodicity that it does not single pakchoi and is not inorganic is not true. sent14: the defeatist strokes ergodicity if the lector is endemic. sent15: the fact that something is not a tenpin and it does not single gladiolus is incorrect if it does not single pakchoi. sent16: the mastoidale is not a lout and is not a tenpin.
sent2 -> int1: the invalidator does not tat and is not a kind of a Chaldean.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the strafer is not a tenpin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the strafer does not single gladiolus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the strafer is not a tenpin and it does not single gladiolus.; sent15 -> int4: that the strafer is not a tenpin and does not single gladiolus is false if the fact that it does not single pakchoi is not incorrect.; sent4 & sent3 -> int5: the mammee either does not single pakchoi or does not stroke ergodicity or both.; int5 & sent6 & sent11 -> int6: the strafer does not single pakchoi.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the strafer is not a tenpin and it does not single gladiolus is not right.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the strafer does not single gladiolus.
sent5 -> int9: the damselfish is endemic and patterns sulkiness.; int9 -> int10: the damselfish is a kind of an endemic.; int10 -> int11: everything is an endemic.; int11 -> int12: the lector is endemic.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the defeatist does stroke ergodicity.; sent13 -> int14: if the defeatist strokes ergodicity that it does not single pakchoi and is organic does not hold.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the defeatist does not single pakchoi and is not inorganic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the strafer does not single gladiolus. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the invalidator is not a Chaldean and it does not single pakchoi is not right. sent2: everything does not tat and it is not a Chaldean. sent3: the defeatist is inorganic. sent4: if the defeatist is inorganic then the mammee does not single pakchoi and/or it does not stroke ergodicity. sent5: everything is a kind of an endemic and patterns sulkiness. sent6: the fact that the strafer does not single pakchoi hold if the mammee does not single pakchoi. sent7: if the fact that the invalidator does not tat but it is a Chaldean is right the strafer is not a tenpin. sent8: the mammee does not single pakchoi or it is not a tenpin or both if the strafer is inorganic. sent9: if the mammee does not single pakchoi then that it does single gladiolus and is a tenpin is false. sent10: the strafer is not a tenpin if the invalidator does not tat and is not Chaldean. sent11: the strafer does not single pakchoi if the mammee does not stroke ergodicity. sent12: the fact that the invalidator is organic and not a Chaldean is wrong. sent13: if something does stroke ergodicity that it does not single pakchoi and is not inorganic is not true. sent14: the defeatist strokes ergodicity if the lector is endemic. sent15: the fact that something is not a tenpin and it does not single gladiolus is incorrect if it does not single pakchoi. sent16: the mastoidale is not a lout and is not a tenpin. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the invalidator does not tat and is not a kind of a Chaldean.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the strafer is not a tenpin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the strafer does not single gladiolus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the strafer is not a tenpin and it does not single gladiolus.; sent15 -> int4: that the strafer is not a tenpin and does not single gladiolus is false if the fact that it does not single pakchoi is not incorrect.; sent4 & sent3 -> int5: the mammee either does not single pakchoi or does not stroke ergodicity or both.; int5 & sent6 & sent11 -> int6: the strafer does not single pakchoi.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the strafer is not a tenpin and it does not single gladiolus is not right.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__