the confectionery does not occur.
sent1: if the antagonisticness but not the welding xerophyte happens then the tape does not occur. sent2: if the seed does not occur then the taping does not occur. sent3: the undiplomaticness happens. sent4: the sub-test does not occur. sent5: the temptation or the reimbursing anthozoan or both occurs. sent6: the reimbursing craps occurs. sent7: if the showing and/or the fearfulness happens then that the undiplomaticness does not occur is not false. sent8: either the rule or the dilatation or both happens. sent9: the digitalization occurs if the puckering does not occur. sent10: the antagonisticness happens but the welding xerophyte does not occur if the nonsurgicalness does not occur. sent11: that the disintegration does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: that the tip-off does not occur brings about that the intertidalness does not occur and the routine happens. sent13: the taping does not occur. sent14: if the rotogravure does not occur then that both the diplomaticness and the non-fearfulness occurs is not right. sent15: the non-undiplomaticness is caused by that the fearfulness occurs. sent16: that the taping occurs and the rotogravure occurs prevents the catholicness. sent17: the pleomorphicness happens. sent18: that the tape does not occur but the rotogravure happens leads to the non-catholicness. sent19: the show occurs if the seed happens. sent20: if the seeding does not occur then not the tape but the rotogravure occurs. sent21: not the invention but the khanate occurs. sent22: the confectionery does not occur if the catholicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the seeding happens is not incorrect.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the showing occurs.; int1 -> int2: the showing happens and/or the fearfulness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the undiplomaticness does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the seed does not occur.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: not the taping but the rotogravure happens.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the catholicness does not occur.; int7 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the confectionery occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the confectionery does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the antagonisticness but not the welding xerophyte happens then the tape does not occur. sent2: if the seed does not occur then the taping does not occur. sent3: the undiplomaticness happens. sent4: the sub-test does not occur. sent5: the temptation or the reimbursing anthozoan or both occurs. sent6: the reimbursing craps occurs. sent7: if the showing and/or the fearfulness happens then that the undiplomaticness does not occur is not false. sent8: either the rule or the dilatation or both happens. sent9: the digitalization occurs if the puckering does not occur. sent10: the antagonisticness happens but the welding xerophyte does not occur if the nonsurgicalness does not occur. sent11: that the disintegration does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: that the tip-off does not occur brings about that the intertidalness does not occur and the routine happens. sent13: the taping does not occur. sent14: if the rotogravure does not occur then that both the diplomaticness and the non-fearfulness occurs is not right. sent15: the non-undiplomaticness is caused by that the fearfulness occurs. sent16: that the taping occurs and the rotogravure occurs prevents the catholicness. sent17: the pleomorphicness happens. sent18: that the tape does not occur but the rotogravure happens leads to the non-catholicness. sent19: the show occurs if the seed happens. sent20: if the seeding does not occur then not the tape but the rotogravure occurs. sent21: not the invention but the khanate occurs. sent22: the confectionery does not occur if the catholicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the seeding happens is not incorrect.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the showing occurs.; int1 -> int2: the showing happens and/or the fearfulness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the undiplomaticness does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the seed does not occur.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: not the taping but the rotogravure happens.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the catholicness does not occur.; int7 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__