the fact that the roughleg is not a kind of a cart but it is a rearmament does not hold.
sent1: if something does not prance then that it does not cart and it is a kind of a rearmament is incorrect. sent2: if the weatherglass is a kind of a cart that the roughleg does prance or is not periodontics or both is wrong. sent3: the roughleg does not uncoil reply. sent4: if the acerola is not periodontics the fact that the roughleg is periodontics and/or it is not postmillennial is not true. sent5: the weatherglass is a cart if the fact that the marksman is a rearmament is correct. sent6: if the acerola does not uncoil reply that it does not uncoil intonation and is anaplastic is wrong. sent7: The reply does not uncoil acerola. sent8: the acerola does not uncoil reply. sent9: that something does not prance if the fact that it is periodontics and/or it is not postmillennial does not hold is right.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the acerola does not uncoil intonation but it is anaplastic is wrong.; sent9 -> int2: if that the roughleg is not non-periodontics and/or is not postmillennial is not right that it does not prance is true.; sent1 -> int3: that the roughleg does not cart but it is a kind of a rearmament is false if it does not prance.;
the overseer is not postmillennial.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the roughleg is not a kind of a cart but it is a rearmament does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not prance then that it does not cart and it is a kind of a rearmament is incorrect. sent2: if the weatherglass is a kind of a cart that the roughleg does prance or is not periodontics or both is wrong. sent3: the roughleg does not uncoil reply. sent4: if the acerola is not periodontics the fact that the roughleg is periodontics and/or it is not postmillennial is not true. sent5: the weatherglass is a cart if the fact that the marksman is a rearmament is correct. sent6: if the acerola does not uncoil reply that it does not uncoil intonation and is anaplastic is wrong. sent7: The reply does not uncoil acerola. sent8: the acerola does not uncoil reply. sent9: that something does not prance if the fact that it is periodontics and/or it is not postmillennial does not hold is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the acerola does not uncoil intonation but it is anaplastic is wrong.; sent9 -> int2: if that the roughleg is not non-periodontics and/or is not postmillennial is not right that it does not prance is true.; sent1 -> int3: that the roughleg does not cart but it is a kind of a rearmament is false if it does not prance.; __UNKNOWN__