the viverrine does extinguish cutthroat.
sent1: if the colony does not contribute ghoul the fact that it is not nonrepetitive or it is not a Kilimanjaro or both is false. sent2: if the fact that the viverrine is not a fleabag and/or it is not neotenic is incorrect it does not extinguish cutthroat. sent3: if the fact that the viverrine is a fleabag and/or it is non-neotenic is not true it does not extinguish cutthroat. sent4: if that something either is not nonrepetitive or is not a Kilimanjaro or both is incorrect the fact that it does not extinguish cutthroat is not incorrect. sent5: the viverrine is a fleabag. sent6: there exists nothing that is either not a fleabag or not neotenic or both. sent7: everything is a fleabag.
sent6 -> int1: that the viverrine is not a fleabag or non-neotenic or both does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the favus is not appropriative.
sent4 -> int2: if that either the colony is not nonrepetitive or it is not a kind of a Kilimanjaro or both does not hold then it does not extinguish cutthroat.;
$hypothesis$ = the viverrine does extinguish cutthroat. ; $context$ = sent1: if the colony does not contribute ghoul the fact that it is not nonrepetitive or it is not a Kilimanjaro or both is false. sent2: if the fact that the viverrine is not a fleabag and/or it is not neotenic is incorrect it does not extinguish cutthroat. sent3: if the fact that the viverrine is a fleabag and/or it is non-neotenic is not true it does not extinguish cutthroat. sent4: if that something either is not nonrepetitive or is not a Kilimanjaro or both is incorrect the fact that it does not extinguish cutthroat is not incorrect. sent5: the viverrine is a fleabag. sent6: there exists nothing that is either not a fleabag or not neotenic or both. sent7: everything is a fleabag. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: that the viverrine is not a fleabag or non-neotenic or both does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__