the walk-in is not a kind of a Molluga and is a kind of a Menander.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not unselfish and it is not a kind of a Molluga is incorrect. sent2: the krill does whelp mermaid or it is selfish or both if there is something such that it whelp mermaid. sent3: the fact that the walk-in is not a Molluga but a Menander does not hold if the girl is a Ploceus. sent4: that the girl is a kind of non-higher thing that kidnaps flurry is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the girl does not whelp mermaid and it is not higher is not correct. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a Molluga then the walk-in does individuate tetrahydrocannabinol. sent7: the hyrax does not whelp mermaid and kidnaps flurry if the krill does not individuate tetrahydrocannabinol. sent8: the girl is a Ploceus if the hyrax is a Ploceus. sent9: the buccula whelps mermaid. sent10: there exists something such that that it does not individuate tetrahydrocannabinol and is not a kind of a Ploceus is not true. sent11: if the hyrax does individuate Toledo but it does not whelp mermaid the backgrounding is selfish. sent12: the walk-in does individuate Toledo if something is a kind of a Menander. sent13: the Gongorist is not selfish but it expiates. sent14: something is spectrometric. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not kidnap melodrama and is not higher does not hold the hyrax individuates Toledo. sent16: the fact that the girl does not kidnap melodrama and is not higher is not correct if something is a kind of a Ploceus. sent17: the Gongorist is a Ploceus. sent18: something does not kidnap melodrama and is not higher. sent19: the hyrax is a Ploceus if it is higher. sent20: if something is higher the hyrax individuates Toledo. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Molluga and is a Menander is not right. sent22: if there exists something such that it is selfish the walk-in is not a kind of a Molluga but it is a Menander. sent23: The tetrahydrocannabinol does not individuate krill.
sent17 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a Ploceus.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the girl does not kidnap melodrama and it is not higher is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not kidnap melodrama and is not higher does not hold.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the hyrax does individuate Toledo.;
the fact that the walk-in is not a Molluga but it is a Menander does not hold.
sent9 -> int5: something whelps mermaid.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the krill whelps mermaid and/or is not unselfish.;
$hypothesis$ = the walk-in is not a kind of a Molluga and is a kind of a Menander. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not unselfish and it is not a kind of a Molluga is incorrect. sent2: the krill does whelp mermaid or it is selfish or both if there is something such that it whelp mermaid. sent3: the fact that the walk-in is not a Molluga but a Menander does not hold if the girl is a Ploceus. sent4: that the girl is a kind of non-higher thing that kidnaps flurry is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the girl does not whelp mermaid and it is not higher is not correct. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a Molluga then the walk-in does individuate tetrahydrocannabinol. sent7: the hyrax does not whelp mermaid and kidnaps flurry if the krill does not individuate tetrahydrocannabinol. sent8: the girl is a Ploceus if the hyrax is a Ploceus. sent9: the buccula whelps mermaid. sent10: there exists something such that that it does not individuate tetrahydrocannabinol and is not a kind of a Ploceus is not true. sent11: if the hyrax does individuate Toledo but it does not whelp mermaid the backgrounding is selfish. sent12: the walk-in does individuate Toledo if something is a kind of a Menander. sent13: the Gongorist is not selfish but it expiates. sent14: something is spectrometric. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not kidnap melodrama and is not higher does not hold the hyrax individuates Toledo. sent16: the fact that the girl does not kidnap melodrama and is not higher is not correct if something is a kind of a Ploceus. sent17: the Gongorist is a Ploceus. sent18: something does not kidnap melodrama and is not higher. sent19: the hyrax is a Ploceus if it is higher. sent20: if something is higher the hyrax individuates Toledo. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Molluga and is a Menander is not right. sent22: if there exists something such that it is selfish the walk-in is not a kind of a Molluga but it is a Menander. sent23: The tetrahydrocannabinol does not individuate krill. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a Ploceus.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the girl does not kidnap melodrama and it is not higher is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not kidnap melodrama and is not higher does not hold.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the hyrax does individuate Toledo.; __UNKNOWN__