the xericness occurs.
sent1: the pun does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the adiabaticness happens is not incorrect that the obviation does not occur but the coxing occurs is wrong. sent3: that the pun happens or the defraying Luke does not occur or both does not hold if the punting does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the salving plaintiveness happens is false then not the reconnaissance but the Curietherapy occurs. sent5: that the clocking tenant does not occur and the plague does not occur is not right if the punning does not occur. sent6: if the plague occurs that not the clocking tenant but the xericness occurs does not hold. sent7: if the Calcuttanness does not occur then the adiabaticness occurs and the otoplasty occurs. sent8: the xericness occurs if the defraying Luke occurs. sent9: the nonviolence does not occur. sent10: the defraying Luke occurs if the clocking tenant happens. sent11: the initiate happens. sent12: the fact that the Calcuttanness does not occur hold if that the salving Cardamine does not occur but the Calcuttanness occurs is not correct. sent13: the plague does not occur. sent14: the non-Naziness and the non-vehicularness occurs. sent15: the punting does not occur if that the obviation does not occur and the coxing happens is not true. sent16: if that the Curietherapy occurs hold then that the salving Cardamine does not occur but the Calcuttanness happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the clocking tenant does not occur hold.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the clocking tenant does not occur and the plague does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the clocking tenant does not occur and the plague does not occur is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the clocking tenant occurs is not incorrect.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the defraying Luke occurs.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the xericness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the xericness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the pun does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the adiabaticness happens is not incorrect that the obviation does not occur but the coxing occurs is wrong. sent3: that the pun happens or the defraying Luke does not occur or both does not hold if the punting does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the salving plaintiveness happens is false then not the reconnaissance but the Curietherapy occurs. sent5: that the clocking tenant does not occur and the plague does not occur is not right if the punning does not occur. sent6: if the plague occurs that not the clocking tenant but the xericness occurs does not hold. sent7: if the Calcuttanness does not occur then the adiabaticness occurs and the otoplasty occurs. sent8: the xericness occurs if the defraying Luke occurs. sent9: the nonviolence does not occur. sent10: the defraying Luke occurs if the clocking tenant happens. sent11: the initiate happens. sent12: the fact that the Calcuttanness does not occur hold if that the salving Cardamine does not occur but the Calcuttanness occurs is not correct. sent13: the plague does not occur. sent14: the non-Naziness and the non-vehicularness occurs. sent15: the punting does not occur if that the obviation does not occur and the coxing happens is not true. sent16: if that the Curietherapy occurs hold then that the salving Cardamine does not occur but the Calcuttanness happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the clocking tenant does not occur hold.; assump1 & sent13 -> int1: the clocking tenant does not occur and the plague does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the clocking tenant does not occur and the plague does not occur is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the clocking tenant occurs is not incorrect.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the defraying Luke occurs.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__