the hesitation occurs.
sent1: the following viscounty is prevented by the non-azoness. sent2: that the cometariness happens and the fastball occurs is correct if the Yeatsianness does not occur. sent3: the blaspheming sag does not occur and the blaspheming she-devil does not occur if the fact that the fastball occurs is right. sent4: if the fact that the mirage and the gobble happens is not true then the mirage does not occur. sent5: the fact that that the blaspheming sag does not occur results in that the hesitation happens or the following viscounty or both is not false. sent6: the gobbling does not occur. sent7: if the fact that not the mud but the azoness happens is not right then the following viscounty does not occur. sent8: that the crabbing and the conservancy occurs is triggered by that the surprising takeover does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the crabbing occurs hold then the blaspheming advisability happens but the runicness does not occur. sent10: the monochromaticness does not occur. sent11: the hesitation happens if the monochromaticness happens. sent12: the azoness occurs if that the following viscounty happens hold. sent13: the surprising takeover does not occur if that the surprising approver happens and the blaspheming lightness happens is incorrect. sent14: that the azoness happens is caused by that the hesitation occurs. sent15: if the monochromaticness happens then the jumping does not occur. sent16: that the blaspheming advisability occurs but the runicness does not occur results in that the Yeatsianness does not occur. sent17: if the jump does not occur the fact that not the mud but the azoness happens does not hold. sent18: if the following viscounty does not occur the hesitation does not occur. sent19: that the mirage and the gobbling occurs is not right if the monochromaticness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that not the monochromaticness but the gobbling occurs is incorrect that the jumping does not occur is not wrong. sent21: that the monochromaticness does not occur and/or the mudding does not occur causes that the monochromaticness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the non-monochromaticness and the gobble happens.; assump1 -> int1: the gobble happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the non-monochromaticness and the gobble happens is wrong.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the jumping does not occur is not wrong.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the fact that not the mud but the azoness occurs is wrong.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the following viscounty does not occur.; sent18 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the hesitation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the hesitation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the following viscounty is prevented by the non-azoness. sent2: that the cometariness happens and the fastball occurs is correct if the Yeatsianness does not occur. sent3: the blaspheming sag does not occur and the blaspheming she-devil does not occur if the fact that the fastball occurs is right. sent4: if the fact that the mirage and the gobble happens is not true then the mirage does not occur. sent5: the fact that that the blaspheming sag does not occur results in that the hesitation happens or the following viscounty or both is not false. sent6: the gobbling does not occur. sent7: if the fact that not the mud but the azoness happens is not right then the following viscounty does not occur. sent8: that the crabbing and the conservancy occurs is triggered by that the surprising takeover does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the crabbing occurs hold then the blaspheming advisability happens but the runicness does not occur. sent10: the monochromaticness does not occur. sent11: the hesitation happens if the monochromaticness happens. sent12: the azoness occurs if that the following viscounty happens hold. sent13: the surprising takeover does not occur if that the surprising approver happens and the blaspheming lightness happens is incorrect. sent14: that the azoness happens is caused by that the hesitation occurs. sent15: if the monochromaticness happens then the jumping does not occur. sent16: that the blaspheming advisability occurs but the runicness does not occur results in that the Yeatsianness does not occur. sent17: if the jump does not occur the fact that not the mud but the azoness happens does not hold. sent18: if the following viscounty does not occur the hesitation does not occur. sent19: that the mirage and the gobbling occurs is not right if the monochromaticness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that not the monochromaticness but the gobbling occurs is incorrect that the jumping does not occur is not wrong. sent21: that the monochromaticness does not occur and/or the mudding does not occur causes that the monochromaticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the non-monochromaticness and the gobble happens.; assump1 -> int1: the gobble happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the non-monochromaticness and the gobble happens is wrong.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the jumping does not occur is not wrong.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the fact that not the mud but the azoness occurs is wrong.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the following viscounty does not occur.; sent18 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__