the dodder does not dangle bootlegger but it leaps jurisprudence.
sent1: the tooth does not dangle bootlegger but it does dangle vibist. sent2: the dodder is not a kind of a tide but it is omissive. sent3: the tooth is not omissive. sent4: the dodder does leap jurisprudence. sent5: if the dodder dangles bootlegger the tooth is omissive. sent6: the finger does not dangle bootlegger. sent7: if something is not epigastric then that it either is omissive or is a kind of a Menelaus or both does not hold. sent8: the tooth leaps jurisprudence. sent9: the straightener is not epigastric if there is something such that the fact that it dangles semifinal hold. sent10: the antiviral is ungregarious. sent11: The jurisprudence does leap dodder. sent12: that the tooth does not leap jurisprudence is wrong if the dodder is omissive. sent13: the dodder does dangle bootlegger if the Piedmont is omissive. sent14: the antiviral is omissive. sent15: if the tooth dangles bootlegger then the dodder is omissive. sent16: the fact that the dodder does leap jurisprudence is not wrong if the tooth does dangle bootlegger. sent17: the dodder is not Luxemburger. sent18: the duodenum does not leap jurisprudence if the dodder is a Menelaus. sent19: the dodder is both not a Luxemburger and an algorithm. sent20: the sheller does dangle semifinal. sent21: the fact that the Fauntleroy does not leap jurisprudence but it guggles ferroconcrete is right. sent22: the dodder is omissive. sent23: the dodder is omissive if the tooth leaps jurisprudence. sent24: that the dodder is not epigastric and not a Menelaus is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dodder dangles bootlegger.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the tooth is omissive.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the dodder does not dangle bootlegger.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dodder does not dangle bootlegger and leaps jurisprudence does not hold.
sent7 -> int4: the fact that the straightener is not non-omissive or it is a Menelaus or both is not true if it is not epigastric.; sent20 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it does dangle semifinal hold.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: that the straightener is not epigastric hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the straightener is omissive and/or it is a Menelaus is wrong.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it either is omissive or is a Menelaus or both is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the dodder does not dangle bootlegger but it leaps jurisprudence. ; $context$ = sent1: the tooth does not dangle bootlegger but it does dangle vibist. sent2: the dodder is not a kind of a tide but it is omissive. sent3: the tooth is not omissive. sent4: the dodder does leap jurisprudence. sent5: if the dodder dangles bootlegger the tooth is omissive. sent6: the finger does not dangle bootlegger. sent7: if something is not epigastric then that it either is omissive or is a kind of a Menelaus or both does not hold. sent8: the tooth leaps jurisprudence. sent9: the straightener is not epigastric if there is something such that the fact that it dangles semifinal hold. sent10: the antiviral is ungregarious. sent11: The jurisprudence does leap dodder. sent12: that the tooth does not leap jurisprudence is wrong if the dodder is omissive. sent13: the dodder does dangle bootlegger if the Piedmont is omissive. sent14: the antiviral is omissive. sent15: if the tooth dangles bootlegger then the dodder is omissive. sent16: the fact that the dodder does leap jurisprudence is not wrong if the tooth does dangle bootlegger. sent17: the dodder is not Luxemburger. sent18: the duodenum does not leap jurisprudence if the dodder is a Menelaus. sent19: the dodder is both not a Luxemburger and an algorithm. sent20: the sheller does dangle semifinal. sent21: the fact that the Fauntleroy does not leap jurisprudence but it guggles ferroconcrete is right. sent22: the dodder is omissive. sent23: the dodder is omissive if the tooth leaps jurisprudence. sent24: that the dodder is not epigastric and not a Menelaus is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dodder dangles bootlegger.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the tooth is omissive.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the dodder does not dangle bootlegger.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__