that the adducting glyptography and the stemmaticness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the inspissation does not occur or the azoticness does not occur or both is correct. sent2: not the downfall but the secondment occurs. sent3: if the lambing pounce does not occur and the scurfiness does not occur the adducting glyptography happens. sent4: the path does not occur and the supervention does not occur. sent5: that the stemmaticness occurs is right if the lambing peeper does not occur. sent6: if the abstinence does not occur then the lambing pounce does not occur and the scurfiness does not occur. sent7: either the adducting polyploidy does not occur or the eyedrop occurs or both. sent8: that the lambing peeper does not occur is triggered by either that the handicraft occurs or the adducting machinery or both. sent9: that the abstinence does not occur is brought about by that either the inspissation does not occur or the azoticness does not occur or both. sent10: if either the handicraft does not occur or the toelessness happens or both the downfall occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handicraft does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the handicraft does not occur or the toelessness happens or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the downfall occurs.; sent2 -> int3: the downfall does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the handicraft happens.; int5 -> int6: either the handicraft occurs or the adducting machinery occurs or both.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the lambing peeper does not occur is not wrong.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the stemmaticness happens.; sent9 & sent1 -> int9: the abstinence does not occur.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the lambing pounce does not occur and the scurfiness does not occur.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the adducting glyptography occurs.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the adducting glyptography and the stemmaticness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the inspissation does not occur or the azoticness does not occur or both is correct. sent2: not the downfall but the secondment occurs. sent3: if the lambing pounce does not occur and the scurfiness does not occur the adducting glyptography happens. sent4: the path does not occur and the supervention does not occur. sent5: that the stemmaticness occurs is right if the lambing peeper does not occur. sent6: if the abstinence does not occur then the lambing pounce does not occur and the scurfiness does not occur. sent7: either the adducting polyploidy does not occur or the eyedrop occurs or both. sent8: that the lambing peeper does not occur is triggered by either that the handicraft occurs or the adducting machinery or both. sent9: that the abstinence does not occur is brought about by that either the inspissation does not occur or the azoticness does not occur or both. sent10: if either the handicraft does not occur or the toelessness happens or both the downfall occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handicraft does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the handicraft does not occur or the toelessness happens or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the downfall occurs.; sent2 -> int3: the downfall does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the handicraft happens.; int5 -> int6: either the handicraft occurs or the adducting machinery occurs or both.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the lambing peeper does not occur is not wrong.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the stemmaticness happens.; sent9 & sent1 -> int9: the abstinence does not occur.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the lambing pounce does not occur and the scurfiness does not occur.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the adducting glyptography occurs.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__