the mexiletine is a WMO.
sent1: if there is something such that it is not biological the slicer does disavow Romeo. sent2: if the fact that the caliph is explicit but it is not an insensitivity is not correct then the freeholder is a kind of an insensitivity. sent3: the Romeo is a WMO if it is a ranter. sent4: that something is not a ranter and is an insensitivity is false if it is a guerrilla. sent5: the fact that the freeholder is a kind of an insensitivity that is a kind of a ranter is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the freeholder is an insensitivity but it is not a kind of a ranter does not hold then the mexiletine is a ranter. sent7: that the Romeo is a ranter hold if the freeholder is an insensitivity. sent8: if the fact that the freeholder is a ranter is correct then the mexiletine is a ranter. sent9: the mezzotint is not biological. sent10: the fact that the boyfriend is a kind of an insensitivity but it is not a ulema is not correct. sent11: if the freeholder is not a kind of a WMO then the fact that the mexiletine is not a WMO is not false. sent12: that the caliph is explicit but it is not an insensitivity is false if the slicer is a guerrilla. sent13: the fact that the freeholder is an insensitivity and is not a ranter is wrong. sent14: if there exists something such that it disavows Romeo the caliph is a kind of a guerrilla and is explicit.
sent6 & sent13 -> int1: the mexiletine is a ranter.;
the Romeo is a kind of a WMO.
$hypothesis$ = the mexiletine is a WMO. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not biological the slicer does disavow Romeo. sent2: if the fact that the caliph is explicit but it is not an insensitivity is not correct then the freeholder is a kind of an insensitivity. sent3: the Romeo is a WMO if it is a ranter. sent4: that something is not a ranter and is an insensitivity is false if it is a guerrilla. sent5: the fact that the freeholder is a kind of an insensitivity that is a kind of a ranter is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the freeholder is an insensitivity but it is not a kind of a ranter does not hold then the mexiletine is a ranter. sent7: that the Romeo is a ranter hold if the freeholder is an insensitivity. sent8: if the fact that the freeholder is a ranter is correct then the mexiletine is a ranter. sent9: the mezzotint is not biological. sent10: the fact that the boyfriend is a kind of an insensitivity but it is not a ulema is not correct. sent11: if the freeholder is not a kind of a WMO then the fact that the mexiletine is not a WMO is not false. sent12: that the caliph is explicit but it is not an insensitivity is false if the slicer is a guerrilla. sent13: the fact that the freeholder is an insensitivity and is not a ranter is wrong. sent14: if there exists something such that it disavows Romeo the caliph is a kind of a guerrilla and is explicit. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent13 -> int1: the mexiletine is a ranter.; __UNKNOWN__