that that the osteopathy does not occur and the exposure happens is triggered by that the larding occurs is not right.
sent1: the perversion but not the hurricane occurs. sent2: that both the non-Hungarianness and the osteopathy occurs is not true if the furrowing fatness happens. sent3: the Hungarian happens if the fact that the fact that the fact that not the Hungarian but the osteopathy happens is not false does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: that the furrowing fatness occurs and/or the osteopathy happens prevents that the lard happens. sent5: if the insulation does not occur that both the exposure and the recognition occurs is not right. sent6: if the opposition does not occur then the fact that the change and the reassailing mange happens is not correct. sent7: the reassailing viroid does not occur and the opposition does not occur if the vasodilation does not occur. sent8: the enlivening dial occurs. sent9: that the larding does not occur is prevented by that the furrowing fatness or the osteopathy or both occurs. sent10: if that the change happens and the reassailing mange occurs is wrong then the insulation does not occur. sent11: the exposure happens but the recognition does not occur. sent12: the recognition does not occur. sent13: if the furrowing fatness happens the fact that the lard does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the osteopathy happens.; assump1 -> int1: the furrowing fatness occurs and/or the osteopathy happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the lard occurs is not true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the larding occurs is true.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the osteopathy does not occur.; sent11 -> int5: the exposure occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the osteopathy does not occur and the exposure occurs.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the booking and/or the Hungarianness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that that the osteopathy does not occur and the exposure happens is triggered by that the larding occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the perversion but not the hurricane occurs. sent2: that both the non-Hungarianness and the osteopathy occurs is not true if the furrowing fatness happens. sent3: the Hungarian happens if the fact that the fact that the fact that not the Hungarian but the osteopathy happens is not false does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: that the furrowing fatness occurs and/or the osteopathy happens prevents that the lard happens. sent5: if the insulation does not occur that both the exposure and the recognition occurs is not right. sent6: if the opposition does not occur then the fact that the change and the reassailing mange happens is not correct. sent7: the reassailing viroid does not occur and the opposition does not occur if the vasodilation does not occur. sent8: the enlivening dial occurs. sent9: that the larding does not occur is prevented by that the furrowing fatness or the osteopathy or both occurs. sent10: if that the change happens and the reassailing mange occurs is wrong then the insulation does not occur. sent11: the exposure happens but the recognition does not occur. sent12: the recognition does not occur. sent13: if the furrowing fatness happens the fact that the lard does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the osteopathy happens.; assump1 -> int1: the furrowing fatness occurs and/or the osteopathy happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the lard occurs is not true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the larding occurs is true.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the osteopathy does not occur.; sent11 -> int5: the exposure occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the osteopathy does not occur and the exposure occurs.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__