the see clears bridgehead.
sent1: if the wretch flogs then it is a Trachelospermum. sent2: that if something does not clear bridgehead then it is both fissionable and non-cash-and-carry is correct. sent3: the wretch does flog. sent4: if something clears frontlet but it is not an undercarriage it is a stigmatic. sent5: that the see is not cash-and-carry is not wrong if it does not clear bridgehead. sent6: if the vector bonnets tearjerker the extreme does clear frontlet but it is not an undercarriage. sent7: something that is a stigmatic is a Trachelospermum or does not flog or both. sent8: something is not cash-and-carry if it does not clear bridgehead. sent9: if something is not cash-and-carry it is not a Trachelospermum and does not clear bridgehead. sent10: the wretch flogs if it is cash-and-carry. sent11: if the wretch does not clear bridgehead then the see does not clear bridgehead. sent12: if the pepperidge does not clear bridgehead the wretch does not clear bridgehead. sent13: the vector does bonnet tearjerker if the tablefork bonnet tearjerker. sent14: something is not a commute. sent15: the knot is cash-and-carry.
sent2 -> int1: if the see does not clear bridgehead then it is not nonfissionable and it is not cash-and-carry.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the see does not clear bridgehead.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the see is not nonfissionable and it is not cash-and-carry.; int2 -> int3: the see is not nonfissionable.; sent1 & sent3 -> int4: the wretch is a kind of a Trachelospermum.;
the see does not clear bridgehead.
sent7 -> int5: the extreme is a Trachelospermum and/or it does not flog if it is a stigmatic.; sent4 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the extreme is the stigmatic is not incorrect if the extreme does clear frontlet but it is not a kind of an undercarriage hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the see clears bridgehead. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wretch flogs then it is a Trachelospermum. sent2: that if something does not clear bridgehead then it is both fissionable and non-cash-and-carry is correct. sent3: the wretch does flog. sent4: if something clears frontlet but it is not an undercarriage it is a stigmatic. sent5: that the see is not cash-and-carry is not wrong if it does not clear bridgehead. sent6: if the vector bonnets tearjerker the extreme does clear frontlet but it is not an undercarriage. sent7: something that is a stigmatic is a Trachelospermum or does not flog or both. sent8: something is not cash-and-carry if it does not clear bridgehead. sent9: if something is not cash-and-carry it is not a Trachelospermum and does not clear bridgehead. sent10: the wretch flogs if it is cash-and-carry. sent11: if the wretch does not clear bridgehead then the see does not clear bridgehead. sent12: if the pepperidge does not clear bridgehead the wretch does not clear bridgehead. sent13: the vector does bonnet tearjerker if the tablefork bonnet tearjerker. sent14: something is not a commute. sent15: the knot is cash-and-carry. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the see does not clear bridgehead then it is not nonfissionable and it is not cash-and-carry.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the see does not clear bridgehead.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the see is not nonfissionable and it is not cash-and-carry.; int2 -> int3: the see is not nonfissionable.; sent1 & sent3 -> int4: the wretch is a kind of a Trachelospermum.; __UNKNOWN__