the potsherd reflectorizes chimney.
sent1: if the speaker is palmar it is a meritocracy. sent2: that something is extrasystolic and does not reflectorize narcotic is not wrong. sent3: there is something such that it is a kind of non-palmar thing that does not reflectorize chimney. sent4: the potsherd is a meritocracy if that it reflectorizes chimney hold. sent5: there exists something such that it is non-extrasystolic thing that does not reflectorize narcotic. sent6: the chimney is a kind of a meritocracy. sent7: that the narcotic is not palmar but it is a meritocracy is false if the speaker is not a lapidary. sent8: if something is not extrasystolic and it does not reflectorize narcotic the speaker is not a meritocracy. sent9: the fact that something is not a lapidary and it is not a meritocracy is not incorrect. sent10: there is something such that it does not reflectorize chimney and is not palmar. sent11: the potsherd does not reflectorize chimney if that the narcotic does not draw internuncio but it is not non-lapidary is not true. sent12: the fact that the narcotic does not draw internuncio and is a lapidary does not hold if the speaker is not palmar. sent13: the narcotic is zodiacal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the speaker is palmar.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the speaker is a kind of a meritocracy.; sent5 & sent8 -> int2: the speaker is not a meritocracy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the speaker is not palmar.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the narcotic does not draw internuncio and is a kind of a lapidary is not true.; int5 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the potsherd reflectorizes chimney. ; $context$ = sent1: if the speaker is palmar it is a meritocracy. sent2: that something is extrasystolic and does not reflectorize narcotic is not wrong. sent3: there is something such that it is a kind of non-palmar thing that does not reflectorize chimney. sent4: the potsherd is a meritocracy if that it reflectorizes chimney hold. sent5: there exists something such that it is non-extrasystolic thing that does not reflectorize narcotic. sent6: the chimney is a kind of a meritocracy. sent7: that the narcotic is not palmar but it is a meritocracy is false if the speaker is not a lapidary. sent8: if something is not extrasystolic and it does not reflectorize narcotic the speaker is not a meritocracy. sent9: the fact that something is not a lapidary and it is not a meritocracy is not incorrect. sent10: there is something such that it does not reflectorize chimney and is not palmar. sent11: the potsherd does not reflectorize chimney if that the narcotic does not draw internuncio but it is not non-lapidary is not true. sent12: the fact that the narcotic does not draw internuncio and is a lapidary does not hold if the speaker is not palmar. sent13: the narcotic is zodiacal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the speaker is palmar.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the speaker is a kind of a meritocracy.; sent5 & sent8 -> int2: the speaker is not a meritocracy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the speaker is not palmar.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the narcotic does not draw internuncio and is a kind of a lapidary is not true.; int5 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__