the trowel is organicistic.
sent1: the leucothoe is a dunker. sent2: if there exists something such that it does command spall and/or it is stimulative the leucothoe is not a dunker. sent3: the trowel is not exoergic if there exists something such that the fact that it is a bacteriology and it is a barograph is not true. sent4: if something is not exoergic then that it is organicistic is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the humanities is stimulative.; assump1 -> int1: the humanities either commands spall or is not non-stimulative or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it commands spall and/or is stimulative.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the leucothoe is not a dunker.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the humanities is not stimulative.; sent4 -> int6: if the trowel is not exoergic then it is organicistic.;
$hypothesis$ = the trowel is organicistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the leucothoe is a dunker. sent2: if there exists something such that it does command spall and/or it is stimulative the leucothoe is not a dunker. sent3: the trowel is not exoergic if there exists something such that the fact that it is a bacteriology and it is a barograph is not true. sent4: if something is not exoergic then that it is organicistic is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the humanities is stimulative.; assump1 -> int1: the humanities either commands spall or is not non-stimulative or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it commands spall and/or is stimulative.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the leucothoe is not a dunker.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the humanities is not stimulative.; sent4 -> int6: if the trowel is not exoergic then it is organicistic.; __UNKNOWN__