that the niacin is not beakless is not incorrect.
sent1: something is Faustian if the fact that the fact that it is testimonial and/or is not a kind of a keystroke is not false is false. sent2: the topminnow is not supraorbital and does not try. sent3: if the carbonate is a INC then the fact that the fact that the bailor is testimonial or is not a kind of a keystroke or both hold is not right. sent4: if the niacin is not a Delichon then that the topminnow is a kind of non-supraorbital thing that does try is not true. sent5: the carbonate is a INC. sent6: the topminnow is not beakless. sent7: the fact that the topminnow is not supraorbital and it does not try does not hold if the niacin is not a Delichon. sent8: if the fact that the topminnow tries and does not revert is not correct then it is not a Delichon. sent9: if the fact that the niacin is a kind of a Delichon is not wrong the fact that it does revert and is not secretarial is not true. sent10: the topminnow does not revert if the fact that it is a Delichon and it does not try is not right. sent11: if the topminnow is beakless then the niacin is beakless. sent12: the ichor is secretarial if the bailor is Faustian. sent13: the topminnow does not try and it is not numeric.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the niacin is not a Delichon.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the topminnow is not supraorbital and it does not try is incorrect.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the niacin is a Delichon.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the niacin reverts but it is not secretarial is false.;
that the niacin is beakless is not incorrect.
sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the bailor is testimonial and/or it is not a kind of a keystroke is wrong it is Faustian.; sent3 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the bailor is testimonial and/or not a keystroke does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bailor is Faustian.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the ichor is secretarial.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is secretarial.;
$hypothesis$ = that the niacin is not beakless is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is Faustian if the fact that the fact that it is testimonial and/or is not a kind of a keystroke is not false is false. sent2: the topminnow is not supraorbital and does not try. sent3: if the carbonate is a INC then the fact that the fact that the bailor is testimonial or is not a kind of a keystroke or both hold is not right. sent4: if the niacin is not a Delichon then that the topminnow is a kind of non-supraorbital thing that does try is not true. sent5: the carbonate is a INC. sent6: the topminnow is not beakless. sent7: the fact that the topminnow is not supraorbital and it does not try does not hold if the niacin is not a Delichon. sent8: if the fact that the topminnow tries and does not revert is not correct then it is not a Delichon. sent9: if the fact that the niacin is a kind of a Delichon is not wrong the fact that it does revert and is not secretarial is not true. sent10: the topminnow does not revert if the fact that it is a Delichon and it does not try is not right. sent11: if the topminnow is beakless then the niacin is beakless. sent12: the ichor is secretarial if the bailor is Faustian. sent13: the topminnow does not try and it is not numeric. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the niacin is not a Delichon.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the topminnow is not supraorbital and it does not try is incorrect.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the niacin is a Delichon.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the niacin reverts but it is not secretarial is false.; __UNKNOWN__