the Maxzide does maintain original and is a kind of a subcontract.
sent1: The incompetence does not camouflage boutique. sent2: that the rough does not subcontract hold if there exists something such that it testifies and is not a bulletin. sent3: if the rough does not subcontract then the Maxzide does subcontract. sent4: there exists something such that it is a subcontract. sent5: there exists something such that it does testify and it is not a bulletin. sent6: something that does not maintain original and is not non-Dutch does not camouflage incompetence. sent7: the fact that the Maxzide does maintain original hold if the pine is a kind of a Dutch. sent8: something does not subcontract if the fact that it does subcontract and it does camouflage incompetence is not true. sent9: something camouflages incompetence and is not a kind of a subcontract. sent10: the rough is not Dutch. sent11: if there exists something such that it maintains original and it does not camouflage incompetence then the pine is not a Dutch. sent12: if the boutique does not camouflage incompetence the pine is a Dutch. sent13: the boutique does not camouflage incompetence. sent14: the rough is a kind of a bulletin and it is a lagomorph. sent15: the rough is not a kind of a carbuncled.
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the pine is a Dutch.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the Maxzide does maintain original is true.; sent5 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the rough does not subcontract is correct.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the Maxzide subcontracts.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is a cathedral and it does not detribalize Gabon.
sent6 -> int5: if the pine does not maintain original and is a Dutch then it does not camouflage incompetence.;
$hypothesis$ = the Maxzide does maintain original and is a kind of a subcontract. ; $context$ = sent1: The incompetence does not camouflage boutique. sent2: that the rough does not subcontract hold if there exists something such that it testifies and is not a bulletin. sent3: if the rough does not subcontract then the Maxzide does subcontract. sent4: there exists something such that it is a subcontract. sent5: there exists something such that it does testify and it is not a bulletin. sent6: something that does not maintain original and is not non-Dutch does not camouflage incompetence. sent7: the fact that the Maxzide does maintain original hold if the pine is a kind of a Dutch. sent8: something does not subcontract if the fact that it does subcontract and it does camouflage incompetence is not true. sent9: something camouflages incompetence and is not a kind of a subcontract. sent10: the rough is not Dutch. sent11: if there exists something such that it maintains original and it does not camouflage incompetence then the pine is not a Dutch. sent12: if the boutique does not camouflage incompetence the pine is a Dutch. sent13: the boutique does not camouflage incompetence. sent14: the rough is a kind of a bulletin and it is a lagomorph. sent15: the rough is not a kind of a carbuncled. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the pine is a Dutch.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the Maxzide does maintain original is true.; sent5 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the rough does not subcontract is correct.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the Maxzide subcontracts.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__