the armlessness happens.
sent1: the hoofing does not occur. sent2: both the prostheticness and the mellowing gilbert occurs. sent3: the apothecialness occurs and the styling clinch happens if that the hoofing does not occur hold. sent4: that the winnow does not occur is prevented by the non-inclusiveness. sent5: if the prostheticness occurs and the inclusiveness happens the styling clinch does not occur. sent6: the winnow prevents the non-armlessness. sent7: if the fact that the prostheticness occurs and the armlessness happens is not correct the armlessness does not occur.
sent2 -> int1: the prostheticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the inclusiveness occurs is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the prostheticness and the inclusiveness occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the styling clinch does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: the apothecialness and the styling clinch occurs.; int4 -> int5: the styling clinch happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the inclusiveness does not occur is not wrong.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the winnow happens.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the armlessness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the armlessness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the hoofing does not occur. sent2: both the prostheticness and the mellowing gilbert occurs. sent3: the apothecialness occurs and the styling clinch happens if that the hoofing does not occur hold. sent4: that the winnow does not occur is prevented by the non-inclusiveness. sent5: if the prostheticness occurs and the inclusiveness happens the styling clinch does not occur. sent6: the winnow prevents the non-armlessness. sent7: if the fact that the prostheticness occurs and the armlessness happens is not correct the armlessness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the prostheticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the inclusiveness occurs is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the prostheticness and the inclusiveness occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the styling clinch does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: the apothecialness and the styling clinch occurs.; int4 -> int5: the styling clinch happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the inclusiveness does not occur is not wrong.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the winnow happens.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__