the anatomist is a moderationism and it is attitudinal.
sent1: if something does not tip photometrist it does tip Mackenzie and it is a kind of a discharge. sent2: the auteur is noncritical. sent3: that the walk-up is not undue and is not noncritical is correct. sent4: if the auteur is not a kind of a Christian the anatomist is a moderationism and is attitudinal. sent5: the fact that something is a moderationism and attitudinal is not true if it is not noncritical.
the fact that the anatomist is both a moderationism and attitudinal is not right.
sent5 -> int1: if the anatomist is not noncritical that it is a moderationism and it is attitudinal is false.; sent1 -> int2: the suppressor tips Mackenzie and does discharge if it does not tip photometrist.;
$hypothesis$ = the anatomist is a moderationism and it is attitudinal. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not tip photometrist it does tip Mackenzie and it is a kind of a discharge. sent2: the auteur is noncritical. sent3: that the walk-up is not undue and is not noncritical is correct. sent4: if the auteur is not a kind of a Christian the anatomist is a moderationism and is attitudinal. sent5: the fact that something is a moderationism and attitudinal is not true if it is not noncritical. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__