the choke is a kind of indissoluble thing that is a clutch.
sent1: the meconium is not a clutch if there is something such that that it does list and is attributive does not hold. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a disingenuousness and is a kind of a hydrant is not correct. sent3: something is a kind of a clutch if it is attributive. sent4: that if there exists something such that the fact that it is a disingenuousness and is a kind of a hydrant does not hold then the choke is subcortical is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that either the rudapithecus does not skin or it does not invest Ramachandra or both is false. sent6: the fact that something is subcortical and is attributive is not correct if it is not a kind of a list. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a clutch then that the choke is a shakedown and is not subcortical is wrong. sent8: if something is subcortical then it is a shakedown. sent9: if the fact that the fact that something does not skin and/or it does not invest Ramachandra is true is wrong it does not unloose harvestfish. sent10: the chloroplast either does not unloose harvestfish or is not a skin or both. sent11: the choke is attributive. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a disingenuousness and it is a kind of a hydrant. sent13: that the AMP is a list and it is attributive is not right if there is something such that it does not unloose harvestfish. sent14: if something is not a hydrant then the choke is subcortical. sent15: the AMP is not subcortical if that the rudapithecus is subcortical and is attributive is not right. sent16: if the AMP is a kind of a shakedown and it is indissoluble the meconium is not indissoluble.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the choke is subcortical.; sent8 -> int2: if the choke is subcortical then it is a shakedown.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the choke is shakedown.; sent3 -> int4: the choke does clutch if it is attributive.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the choke does clutch.;
the xenon is indissoluble.
sent9 -> int6: if the fact that the rudapithecus is not a kind of a skin and/or it does not invest Ramachandra is not correct it does not unloose harvestfish.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the rudapithecus does not unloose harvestfish.; int7 -> int8: something does not unloose harvestfish.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the fact that the AMP is a list that is not non-attributive is incorrect.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it is a list and is not non-attributive does not hold.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the meconium is not a clutch.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is not a clutch.; int12 & sent7 -> int13: the fact that the fact that the choke is a shakedown but it is not subcortical is not false is incorrect.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is shakedown and it is not subcortical is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the choke is a kind of indissoluble thing that is a clutch. ; $context$ = sent1: the meconium is not a clutch if there is something such that that it does list and is attributive does not hold. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a disingenuousness and is a kind of a hydrant is not correct. sent3: something is a kind of a clutch if it is attributive. sent4: that if there exists something such that the fact that it is a disingenuousness and is a kind of a hydrant does not hold then the choke is subcortical is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that either the rudapithecus does not skin or it does not invest Ramachandra or both is false. sent6: the fact that something is subcortical and is attributive is not correct if it is not a kind of a list. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a clutch then that the choke is a shakedown and is not subcortical is wrong. sent8: if something is subcortical then it is a shakedown. sent9: if the fact that the fact that something does not skin and/or it does not invest Ramachandra is true is wrong it does not unloose harvestfish. sent10: the chloroplast either does not unloose harvestfish or is not a skin or both. sent11: the choke is attributive. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a disingenuousness and it is a kind of a hydrant. sent13: that the AMP is a list and it is attributive is not right if there is something such that it does not unloose harvestfish. sent14: if something is not a hydrant then the choke is subcortical. sent15: the AMP is not subcortical if that the rudapithecus is subcortical and is attributive is not right. sent16: if the AMP is a kind of a shakedown and it is indissoluble the meconium is not indissoluble. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the choke is subcortical.; sent8 -> int2: if the choke is subcortical then it is a shakedown.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the choke is shakedown.; sent3 -> int4: the choke does clutch if it is attributive.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the choke does clutch.; __UNKNOWN__