the fact that the passerine is a kind of non-introspective thing that convoys worst does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the conodont is not introspective but it is a Wodehouse is not right. sent2: the conodont romanticizes if the fact that the stain does not convoy protohistory is wrong. sent3: if something that teases ping does tease Asuncion the stain does not romanticize. sent4: if the conodont does not tease Asuncion that the passerine is a kind of non-introspective thing that convoys worst does not hold. sent5: that the conodont teases Asuncion and is introspective is not right. sent6: if there is something such that it is not non-introspective the passerine convoys worst. sent7: The ping does tease conodont. sent8: the fact that the conodont does not tease chronicler but it convoys worst is not true. sent9: if the stain whacks the conodont does romanticize. sent10: something is axiological if that it does not unbend itinerary and is not Monacan hold. sent11: if something does romanticize that it does not tease ping and it does not tease Asuncion does not hold. sent12: something is a forested if that the fact that it does not recess and is not a cover-up hold is not right. sent13: something is not a fathometer if that it does not tease celandine and it is not a culture is wrong. sent14: the fact that something does not tease celandine and it is not a kind of a culture does not hold if it is a forested. sent15: something convoys protohistory and/or it is a whacking if it does not differentiate. sent16: if the pneumatophore is not a fathometer then the stain does not differentiate. sent17: the Rush is introspective thing that is nonslippery. sent18: the conodont does tease ping. sent19: the conodont is a censoring and it is a sell. sent20: if the passerine does not tease Asuncion that the conodont is a kind of introspective thing that does convoy worst is not correct. sent21: the tisane does not unbend itinerary and is not Monacan. sent22: if something does tease ping then it is a kind of non-introspective thing that does convoy worst. sent23: if there exists something such that it does whack the stain romanticizes and convoys protohistory. sent24: that that that the pneumatophore does not recess and it is not a cover-up is not incorrect does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it is axiological is true is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conodont teases Asuncion.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the conodont teases ping and it teases Asuncion.; int1 -> int2: something teases ping and does tease Asuncion.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: that that the stain romanticizes does not hold is not incorrect.;
the passerine is not introspective and convoys worst.
sent22 -> int4: the passerine is not introspective but it does convoy worst if it does tease ping.; sent11 -> int5: if the conodont does romanticize the fact that it does not tease ping and it does not tease Asuncion is incorrect.; sent15 -> int6: if the stain does not differentiate either it does convoy protohistory or it is a whacking or both.; sent13 -> int7: the pneumatophore is not a fathometer if the fact that it does not tease celandine and is not a kind of a culture is wrong.; sent14 -> int8: if the pneumatophore is a forested that it does not tease celandine and is not a culture is not right.; sent12 -> int9: the fact that the pneumatophore is a kind of a forested is correct if that it is not a recess and it is not a cover-up is not true.; sent10 -> int10: if the tisane does not unbend itinerary and it is not Monacan then it is axiological.; int10 & sent21 -> int11: the tisane is axiological.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is axiological.; int12 & sent24 -> int13: the fact that the pneumatophore is not a recess and it is not a cover-up is not true.; int9 & int13 -> int14: the pneumatophore is a forested.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the pneumatophore does not tease celandine and it is not a culture does not hold.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the pneumatophore is not a fathometer.; sent16 & int16 -> int17: the stain does not differentiate.; int6 & int17 -> int18: the stain convoys protohistory and/or it whacks.; int18 & sent2 & sent9 -> int19: the conodont romanticizes.; int5 & int19 -> int20: that the conodont does not tease ping and it does not tease Asuncion does not hold.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that that it does not tease ping and does not tease Asuncion does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the passerine is a kind of non-introspective thing that convoys worst does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the conodont is not introspective but it is a Wodehouse is not right. sent2: the conodont romanticizes if the fact that the stain does not convoy protohistory is wrong. sent3: if something that teases ping does tease Asuncion the stain does not romanticize. sent4: if the conodont does not tease Asuncion that the passerine is a kind of non-introspective thing that convoys worst does not hold. sent5: that the conodont teases Asuncion and is introspective is not right. sent6: if there is something such that it is not non-introspective the passerine convoys worst. sent7: The ping does tease conodont. sent8: the fact that the conodont does not tease chronicler but it convoys worst is not true. sent9: if the stain whacks the conodont does romanticize. sent10: something is axiological if that it does not unbend itinerary and is not Monacan hold. sent11: if something does romanticize that it does not tease ping and it does not tease Asuncion does not hold. sent12: something is a forested if that the fact that it does not recess and is not a cover-up hold is not right. sent13: something is not a fathometer if that it does not tease celandine and it is not a culture is wrong. sent14: the fact that something does not tease celandine and it is not a kind of a culture does not hold if it is a forested. sent15: something convoys protohistory and/or it is a whacking if it does not differentiate. sent16: if the pneumatophore is not a fathometer then the stain does not differentiate. sent17: the Rush is introspective thing that is nonslippery. sent18: the conodont does tease ping. sent19: the conodont is a censoring and it is a sell. sent20: if the passerine does not tease Asuncion that the conodont is a kind of introspective thing that does convoy worst is not correct. sent21: the tisane does not unbend itinerary and is not Monacan. sent22: if something does tease ping then it is a kind of non-introspective thing that does convoy worst. sent23: if there exists something such that it does whack the stain romanticizes and convoys protohistory. sent24: that that that the pneumatophore does not recess and it is not a cover-up is not incorrect does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it is axiological is true is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conodont teases Asuncion.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the conodont teases ping and it teases Asuncion.; int1 -> int2: something teases ping and does tease Asuncion.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: that that the stain romanticizes does not hold is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__