the fact that the agnostic is not a kind of a Sufism is correct.
sent1: something is not a kind of a rhabdovirus if it is not non-crinoid. sent2: if the bicarbonate is not a rhabdovirus then that the Chartist is not onymous but it is a kind of a rhabdovirus is not false. sent3: if the fact that something does expatriate and is not a crinoid does not hold then it is not a rhabdovirus. sent4: if the Chartist is a rhabdovirus then the agnostic is a Sufism. sent5: the fact that the cypress is not a kind of a Hindustani is not false if either it is not a unanimity or it is a crinoid or both. sent6: the Conservative does not subside bicarbonate and/or it is Hindustani. sent7: the Conservative is a kind of non-indiscriminate thing that is a Sufism. sent8: the cypress is a Hindustani if the Conservative does not subside bicarbonate and/or is a kind of a Hindustani. sent9: if the cypress is not a crinoid then that the bicarbonate expatriates but it is not crinoid is wrong. sent10: if the bicarbonate is not Hindustani that the cypress is not a unanimity and it is not a crinoid does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cypress is a kind of a crinoid.; assump1 -> int1: the cypress is not a unanimity and/or it is a kind of a crinoid.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the cypress is not Hindustani.; sent8 & sent6 -> int3: the cypress is a Hindustani.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cypress is not a kind of a crinoid.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the bicarbonate expatriates and is not a crinoid is not right.; sent3 -> int7: if that the bicarbonate does expatriate and is not crinoid is not correct it is not a kind of a rhabdovirus.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the bicarbonate is not a rhabdovirus hold.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the Chartist is not onymous and is a rhabdovirus.; int9 -> int10: the Chartist is a rhabdovirus.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the agnostic is not a Sufism.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the agnostic is not a kind of a Sufism is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a rhabdovirus if it is not non-crinoid. sent2: if the bicarbonate is not a rhabdovirus then that the Chartist is not onymous but it is a kind of a rhabdovirus is not false. sent3: if the fact that something does expatriate and is not a crinoid does not hold then it is not a rhabdovirus. sent4: if the Chartist is a rhabdovirus then the agnostic is a Sufism. sent5: the fact that the cypress is not a kind of a Hindustani is not false if either it is not a unanimity or it is a crinoid or both. sent6: the Conservative does not subside bicarbonate and/or it is Hindustani. sent7: the Conservative is a kind of non-indiscriminate thing that is a Sufism. sent8: the cypress is a Hindustani if the Conservative does not subside bicarbonate and/or is a kind of a Hindustani. sent9: if the cypress is not a crinoid then that the bicarbonate expatriates but it is not crinoid is wrong. sent10: if the bicarbonate is not Hindustani that the cypress is not a unanimity and it is not a crinoid does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cypress is a kind of a crinoid.; assump1 -> int1: the cypress is not a unanimity and/or it is a kind of a crinoid.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the cypress is not Hindustani.; sent8 & sent6 -> int3: the cypress is a Hindustani.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cypress is not a kind of a crinoid.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the bicarbonate expatriates and is not a crinoid is not right.; sent3 -> int7: if that the bicarbonate does expatriate and is not crinoid is not correct it is not a kind of a rhabdovirus.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the bicarbonate is not a rhabdovirus hold.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the Chartist is not onymous and is a rhabdovirus.; int9 -> int10: the Chartist is a rhabdovirus.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__