the Italianness does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the inorganicness and the sincereness happens is false then that the shagging happens is correct. sent2: that both the carcinogenicness and the Italian occurs yields that the Ugandan does not occur. sent3: the clapping subgenus does not occur if the dichotomization does not occur. sent4: the game occurs if the TPN does not occur. sent5: that the boycotting does not occur causes that not the dichotomization but the clapping quarterstaff happens. sent6: if the clapping subgenus does not occur then the shag does not occur or the rehabilitativeness does not occur or both. sent7: if the Ugandan does not occur then the fact that both the inorganicness and the sincereness occurs is not true. sent8: if the fact that the clapping subgenus occurs is true the rehabilitativeness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the non-organicness and the insincereness occurs is incorrect. sent10: if the ace does not occur then that the carcinogenicness happens hold. sent11: if the Ugandan does not occur then the fact that the organic does not occur but the insincereness occurs is not correct. sent12: the clapping subgenus happens. sent13: the insincereness does not occur if the shag does not occur or the rehabilitativeness does not occur or both. sent14: the acing does not occur. sent15: if the insincereness occurs then the shagging occurs. sent16: the fact that the insincereness does not occur is not false. sent17: the rehabilitativeness does not occur. sent18: the shag does not occur and the rehabilitativeness does not occur if the clapping subgenus occurs. sent19: the disguising nutritiousness happens and the remilitarization happens.
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the carcinogenicness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Italian occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the carcinogenicness and the Italianness occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Ugandanness does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the inorganicness and the non-insincereness occurs is wrong.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the shagging happens.; sent18 & sent12 -> int6: the shag does not occur and the rehabilitativeness does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the shag does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the Italian occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the Italianness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the inorganicness and the sincereness happens is false then that the shagging happens is correct. sent2: that both the carcinogenicness and the Italian occurs yields that the Ugandan does not occur. sent3: the clapping subgenus does not occur if the dichotomization does not occur. sent4: the game occurs if the TPN does not occur. sent5: that the boycotting does not occur causes that not the dichotomization but the clapping quarterstaff happens. sent6: if the clapping subgenus does not occur then the shag does not occur or the rehabilitativeness does not occur or both. sent7: if the Ugandan does not occur then the fact that both the inorganicness and the sincereness occurs is not true. sent8: if the fact that the clapping subgenus occurs is true the rehabilitativeness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the non-organicness and the insincereness occurs is incorrect. sent10: if the ace does not occur then that the carcinogenicness happens hold. sent11: if the Ugandan does not occur then the fact that the organic does not occur but the insincereness occurs is not correct. sent12: the clapping subgenus happens. sent13: the insincereness does not occur if the shag does not occur or the rehabilitativeness does not occur or both. sent14: the acing does not occur. sent15: if the insincereness occurs then the shagging occurs. sent16: the fact that the insincereness does not occur is not false. sent17: the rehabilitativeness does not occur. sent18: the shag does not occur and the rehabilitativeness does not occur if the clapping subgenus occurs. sent19: the disguising nutritiousness happens and the remilitarization happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the carcinogenicness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Italian occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the carcinogenicness and the Italianness occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Ugandanness does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the inorganicness and the non-insincereness occurs is wrong.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the shagging happens.; sent18 & sent12 -> int6: the shag does not occur and the rehabilitativeness does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the shag does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__