the fact that the highland is cytological but it is not a surplice is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the highland is a azimuth that is not cytological is not false does not hold. sent2: the fact that the highland is cytological and a surplice is not true if the quiver is not cytological. sent3: the fact that the Louvre tags colander but it does not tag captainship does not hold if the fact that the osmund is a railway is right. sent4: the cowboy is cytological if the fact that the highland is a kind of an archangel is not wrong. sent5: the cowboy is an archangel or is a kind of a azimuth or both. sent6: the fact that the Louvre does not tag colander and is not cytological does not hold if the quiver is a railway. sent7: if that the Louvre is non-cytological thing that does not tag colander is not right then the highland does not tag captainship. sent8: the Louvre tags captainship and/or is cytological. sent9: that the highland is cytological thing that is a surplice does not hold. sent10: the Louvre is a surplice if the highland does tag colander. sent11: the fact that the highland is a railway but it is not cytological does not hold if the osmund is not a kind of a railway. sent12: the osmund is a railway if that the cowboy is a kind of a azimuth is right. sent13: the highland does tag colander. sent14: the osmund is a railway if the cowboy is an archangel. sent15: the quiver is non-cytological if that the Louvre does not tag colander and does not tag captainship is wrong. sent16: if the osmund is a railway then that the Louvre does not tag colander and it does not tag captainship is not correct. sent17: that the highland recasts emptiness is not true. sent18: that the highland is not non-cytological but it is not a kind of a surplice is not correct if the quiver is not non-cytological. sent19: there is something such that it is an archangel that is not a kind of a azimuth. sent20: the Louvre is cytological if the highland tags captainship. sent21: the fact that the Louvre does tag colander and does not tag captainship is false. sent22: if that the highland is both not an archangel and not a surplice is not right that the quiver is not cytological hold. sent23: if that the fact that the highland does not tag captainship and is not a surplice is false is not wrong then the Louvre does not tag colander. sent24: if the osmund is not a railway then the fact that the quiver is a railway but it is not cytological is incorrect. sent25: that the quiver is not cytological is true if the Louvre tags colander. sent26: the fact that if something is not an archangel the highland is not non-cytological but it is not a surplice is not wrong.
sent5 & sent14 & sent12 -> int1: that the osmund is a kind of a railway is true.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the Louvre does not tag colander and it does not tag captainship is not true.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the quiver is not cytological.; sent18 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the highland is cytological but it is not a kind of a surplice.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the highland is cytological but it is not a surplice is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the highland is a azimuth that is not cytological is not false does not hold. sent2: the fact that the highland is cytological and a surplice is not true if the quiver is not cytological. sent3: the fact that the Louvre tags colander but it does not tag captainship does not hold if the fact that the osmund is a railway is right. sent4: the cowboy is cytological if the fact that the highland is a kind of an archangel is not wrong. sent5: the cowboy is an archangel or is a kind of a azimuth or both. sent6: the fact that the Louvre does not tag colander and is not cytological does not hold if the quiver is a railway. sent7: if that the Louvre is non-cytological thing that does not tag colander is not right then the highland does not tag captainship. sent8: the Louvre tags captainship and/or is cytological. sent9: that the highland is cytological thing that is a surplice does not hold. sent10: the Louvre is a surplice if the highland does tag colander. sent11: the fact that the highland is a railway but it is not cytological does not hold if the osmund is not a kind of a railway. sent12: the osmund is a railway if that the cowboy is a kind of a azimuth is right. sent13: the highland does tag colander. sent14: the osmund is a railway if the cowboy is an archangel. sent15: the quiver is non-cytological if that the Louvre does not tag colander and does not tag captainship is wrong. sent16: if the osmund is a railway then that the Louvre does not tag colander and it does not tag captainship is not correct. sent17: that the highland recasts emptiness is not true. sent18: that the highland is not non-cytological but it is not a kind of a surplice is not correct if the quiver is not non-cytological. sent19: there is something such that it is an archangel that is not a kind of a azimuth. sent20: the Louvre is cytological if the highland tags captainship. sent21: the fact that the Louvre does tag colander and does not tag captainship is false. sent22: if that the highland is both not an archangel and not a surplice is not right that the quiver is not cytological hold. sent23: if that the fact that the highland does not tag captainship and is not a surplice is false is not wrong then the Louvre does not tag colander. sent24: if the osmund is not a railway then the fact that the quiver is a railway but it is not cytological is incorrect. sent25: that the quiver is not cytological is true if the Louvre tags colander. sent26: the fact that if something is not an archangel the highland is not non-cytological but it is not a surplice is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent14 & sent12 -> int1: that the osmund is a kind of a railway is true.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the Louvre does not tag colander and it does not tag captainship is not true.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the quiver is not cytological.; sent18 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__