the diapensia is destructible.
sent1: that the fact that something is not a kind of a Bloemfontein and it does not sensitize Indiaman is false if it does not contribute patronymic hold. sent2: the pompon is hemodynamics if that the snare is not a Bloemfontein and it does not sensitize Indiaman is not true. sent3: the torchlight is not a kind of a Kwangju if it is not a theory and does not sensitize won. sent4: the diapensia is destructible if the pompon is hemodynamics. sent5: something contributes segregate. sent6: if the Indiaman is a kind of a theory the tautog homologizes. sent7: if that the torchlight is not a kind of a Kwangju and does not sensitize won is not true the Indiaman is a theory. sent8: if the tautog homologizes then the snare does not contribute patronymic but it is a kind of a maneuverability. sent9: that the torchlight is not a Kwangju and does not sensitize won is not right if there is something such that it does contribute segregate.
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the torchlight is not a Kwangju and does not sensitize won is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the Indiaman is a theory.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the tautog does homologize.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the snare does not contribute patronymic but it is a maneuverability.; int4 -> int5: the snare does not contribute patronymic.; sent1 -> int6: if that the snare does not contribute patronymic is not wrong the fact that it is not a Bloemfontein and does not sensitize Indiaman does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the snare is not a Bloemfontein and it does not sensitize Indiaman is wrong.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the pompon is hemodynamics.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the tautog sensitizes Indiaman is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the diapensia is destructible. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that something is not a kind of a Bloemfontein and it does not sensitize Indiaman is false if it does not contribute patronymic hold. sent2: the pompon is hemodynamics if that the snare is not a Bloemfontein and it does not sensitize Indiaman is not true. sent3: the torchlight is not a kind of a Kwangju if it is not a theory and does not sensitize won. sent4: the diapensia is destructible if the pompon is hemodynamics. sent5: something contributes segregate. sent6: if the Indiaman is a kind of a theory the tautog homologizes. sent7: if that the torchlight is not a kind of a Kwangju and does not sensitize won is not true the Indiaman is a theory. sent8: if the tautog homologizes then the snare does not contribute patronymic but it is a kind of a maneuverability. sent9: that the torchlight is not a Kwangju and does not sensitize won is not right if there is something such that it does contribute segregate. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the torchlight is not a Kwangju and does not sensitize won is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the Indiaman is a theory.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the tautog does homologize.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the snare does not contribute patronymic but it is a maneuverability.; int4 -> int5: the snare does not contribute patronymic.; sent1 -> int6: if that the snare does not contribute patronymic is not wrong the fact that it is not a Bloemfontein and does not sensitize Indiaman does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the snare is not a Bloemfontein and it does not sensitize Indiaman is wrong.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the pompon is hemodynamics.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__