the fact that if the laughter does not occur then the unseasonableness and the jiggling tanker occurs is false.
sent1: the unseasonableness happens if that the fact that the roar happens but the file does not occur is false is not incorrect. sent2: the scandal does not occur. sent3: the jiggling Vesuvius does not occur and the by-election happens. sent4: the laughter happens if the fact that the non-illiterateness and the pestling elephant-tusk occurs is not incorrect. sent5: that the phrenicness occurs brings about the Melanesianness. sent6: the fact that the sloth occurs hold if the think occurs. sent7: both the rhizotomy and the thinking happens. sent8: if that both the non-illiterateness and the pestling elephant-tusk occurs is incorrect the jiggling tanker happens. sent9: the fact that the roar but not the filing occurs is not right if the sloth occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the illiterate but the pestling elephant-tusk occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the laughter occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the laughter does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that not the illiterate but the pestling elephant-tusk happens hold is false.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the jiggling tanker happens.; sent7 -> int5: the thinking happens.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the sloth happens.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: that the roaring happens and the file does not occur is not correct.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the unseasonableness happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the unseasonableness occurs and the jiggling tanker happens.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the laughter does not occur then the unseasonableness and the jiggling tanker occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the unseasonableness happens if that the fact that the roar happens but the file does not occur is false is not incorrect. sent2: the scandal does not occur. sent3: the jiggling Vesuvius does not occur and the by-election happens. sent4: the laughter happens if the fact that the non-illiterateness and the pestling elephant-tusk occurs is not incorrect. sent5: that the phrenicness occurs brings about the Melanesianness. sent6: the fact that the sloth occurs hold if the think occurs. sent7: both the rhizotomy and the thinking happens. sent8: if that both the non-illiterateness and the pestling elephant-tusk occurs is incorrect the jiggling tanker happens. sent9: the fact that the roar but not the filing occurs is not right if the sloth occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the illiterate but the pestling elephant-tusk occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the laughter occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the laughter does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that not the illiterate but the pestling elephant-tusk happens hold is false.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the jiggling tanker happens.; sent7 -> int5: the thinking happens.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the sloth happens.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: that the roaring happens and the file does not occur is not correct.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the unseasonableness happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the unseasonableness occurs and the jiggling tanker happens.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__