the northerly is postexilic.
sent1: that the seidel is postexilic hold if it is a kind of a phragmocone. sent2: the largemouth does not gall ambidexterity or does full or both. sent3: if something is a sinus and/or does not orb then it is not full. sent4: if the fact that the baldric redeploys Triglochin is not incorrect that the ditch galls ambidexterity is true. sent5: the northerly does crump if the baldric crump. sent6: the fact that something does gall ambidexterity and redeploys Triglochin is not true if it is not diatonic. sent7: the seidel does not redeploy Triglochin. sent8: something is a sinus and/or it does not orb if it crumps. sent9: if something that is unregenerate is not a phragmocone then the baldric redeploys Triglochin. sent10: something does gall ambidexterity and does not redeploy Triglochin. sent11: if the bugler is a kind of a rutherford the northerly is not non-postexilic. sent12: if the largemouth does not gall ambidexterity and/or it does full then the ditch does not gall ambidexterity. sent13: if something is non-full then that it is diatonic and it is a rutherford is not right. sent14: the baldric crumps and/or it does push. sent15: if that the seidel does not regenerate and it is not a phragmocone is false then the fact that the bugler is diatonic hold. sent16: if something is diatonic then it is a rutherford. sent17: the seidel is not a phragmocone and not a rutherford. sent18: if that something galls ambidexterity and it redeploys Triglochin does not hold it is not postexilic. sent19: something does redeploy Triglochin and is not postexilic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seidel is not regenerate and it is not a phragmocone.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not regenerate and it is not a phragmocone.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the baldric does redeploy Triglochin is not incorrect.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the ditch galls ambidexterity.; sent12 & sent2 -> int4: the ditch does not gall ambidexterity.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the seidel is not regenerate and it is not a kind of a phragmocone is false.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the bugler is diatonic.; sent16 -> int8: if the bugler is diatonic then it is a rutherford.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the bugler is a rutherford.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the northerly is not postexilic.
sent18 -> int10: the northerly is not postexilic if the fact that it does gall ambidexterity and it does redeploy Triglochin is not right.; sent6 -> int11: if the northerly is non-diatonic then that it galls ambidexterity and does redeploy Triglochin does not hold.; sent13 -> int12: if the northerly does not full then that it is diatonic and it is a rutherford is wrong.; sent3 -> int13: if either the northerly is a kind of a sinus or it does not orb or both then it is not full.; sent8 -> int14: either the northerly is a kind of a sinus or it does not orb or both if it does crump.;
$hypothesis$ = the northerly is postexilic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the seidel is postexilic hold if it is a kind of a phragmocone. sent2: the largemouth does not gall ambidexterity or does full or both. sent3: if something is a sinus and/or does not orb then it is not full. sent4: if the fact that the baldric redeploys Triglochin is not incorrect that the ditch galls ambidexterity is true. sent5: the northerly does crump if the baldric crump. sent6: the fact that something does gall ambidexterity and redeploys Triglochin is not true if it is not diatonic. sent7: the seidel does not redeploy Triglochin. sent8: something is a sinus and/or it does not orb if it crumps. sent9: if something that is unregenerate is not a phragmocone then the baldric redeploys Triglochin. sent10: something does gall ambidexterity and does not redeploy Triglochin. sent11: if the bugler is a kind of a rutherford the northerly is not non-postexilic. sent12: if the largemouth does not gall ambidexterity and/or it does full then the ditch does not gall ambidexterity. sent13: if something is non-full then that it is diatonic and it is a rutherford is not right. sent14: the baldric crumps and/or it does push. sent15: if that the seidel does not regenerate and it is not a phragmocone is false then the fact that the bugler is diatonic hold. sent16: if something is diatonic then it is a rutherford. sent17: the seidel is not a phragmocone and not a rutherford. sent18: if that something galls ambidexterity and it redeploys Triglochin does not hold it is not postexilic. sent19: something does redeploy Triglochin and is not postexilic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seidel is not regenerate and it is not a phragmocone.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not regenerate and it is not a phragmocone.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the baldric does redeploy Triglochin is not incorrect.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the ditch galls ambidexterity.; sent12 & sent2 -> int4: the ditch does not gall ambidexterity.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the seidel is not regenerate and it is not a kind of a phragmocone is false.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the bugler is diatonic.; sent16 -> int8: if the bugler is diatonic then it is a rutherford.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the bugler is a rutherford.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__