that the opiate is an ore is not incorrect.
sent1: the bar does school Latrobe. sent2: if the bar schools Latrobe then the vegan does not resist tamarisk and anticipates. sent3: The Latrobe does school bar. sent4: the vegan is an ore if something is a plank and it does strangulate translocation. sent5: if the crabs does not strangulate translocation the shawny urinates. sent6: the fact that the crabs is not a dais but it does strangulate translocation does not hold. sent7: the shawny does not anticipate. sent8: if something is not uncompassionate then that it is a kind of an ore that does not urinate does not hold. sent9: if that the crabs is not a dais but it strangulates translocation is false then the shawny urinates. sent10: the vegan is uncompassionate if the shawny does urinate. sent11: the vegan anticipates if the bar schools Latrobe. sent12: if that something is an ore that does not urinate does not hold it is not a kind of an ore. sent13: the opiate is a kind of an ore if something is uncompassionate and a plank. sent14: if the crabs resists tamarisk it does not plank. sent15: if something does not resist tamarisk but it anticipates then it planks.
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the shawny urinates is true.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the vegan is uncompassionate.; sent15 -> int3: the fact that the vegan is a kind of a plank hold if it does not resist tamarisk and it does anticipate.; sent2 & sent1 -> int4: the vegan does not resist tamarisk and anticipates.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the vegan is a plank.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the vegan is a kind of uncompassionate a plank.; int6 -> int7: something is uncompassionate a plank.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the opiate is not an ore is right.
sent12 -> int8: the fact that if the fact that the opiate is the ore but it does not urinate is incorrect then the opiate is not an ore is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int9: that the opiate is an ore and does not urinate is wrong if it is not uncompassionate.; sent7 -> int10: there exists something such that it does not anticipate.;
$hypothesis$ = that the opiate is an ore is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the bar does school Latrobe. sent2: if the bar schools Latrobe then the vegan does not resist tamarisk and anticipates. sent3: The Latrobe does school bar. sent4: the vegan is an ore if something is a plank and it does strangulate translocation. sent5: if the crabs does not strangulate translocation the shawny urinates. sent6: the fact that the crabs is not a dais but it does strangulate translocation does not hold. sent7: the shawny does not anticipate. sent8: if something is not uncompassionate then that it is a kind of an ore that does not urinate does not hold. sent9: if that the crabs is not a dais but it strangulates translocation is false then the shawny urinates. sent10: the vegan is uncompassionate if the shawny does urinate. sent11: the vegan anticipates if the bar schools Latrobe. sent12: if that something is an ore that does not urinate does not hold it is not a kind of an ore. sent13: the opiate is a kind of an ore if something is uncompassionate and a plank. sent14: if the crabs resists tamarisk it does not plank. sent15: if something does not resist tamarisk but it anticipates then it planks. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the shawny urinates is true.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the vegan is uncompassionate.; sent15 -> int3: the fact that the vegan is a kind of a plank hold if it does not resist tamarisk and it does anticipate.; sent2 & sent1 -> int4: the vegan does not resist tamarisk and anticipates.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the vegan is a plank.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the vegan is a kind of uncompassionate a plank.; int6 -> int7: something is uncompassionate a plank.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__