the fact that if the designation occurs the Orion does not occur but the unpopularness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the non-chloroticness and the sunshine occurs. sent2: the discovery does not occur. sent3: if the jarring wagonwright happens then the countercharge does not occur and the upstage happens. sent4: the designation occurs if both the Orion and the carouse happens. sent5: the fact that the pedesis happens is not wrong. sent6: the equalization does not occur. sent7: that the aftness does not occur is not false if the Glaswegian and the jarring slice happens. sent8: the fact that the pedesis occurs is right if the discovery does not occur. sent9: the arundinaceousness happens and the carousing happens. sent10: that the Orion and the carousing occurs triggers that the designation does not occur. sent11: the non-bolometricness and the enfranchisement happens if the slap occurs. sent12: the fact that the cesareanness does not occur is true. sent13: the unpopularness and the pedesis happens if the discovery does not occur. sent14: the decoupling occurs. sent15: the mindfulness occurs. sent16: that the arundinaceousness occurs is not false. sent17: that the jarring dreamed and the profanedness happens results in that the motivationalness does not occur.
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the carousing occurs is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Orion occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the Orion and the carousing occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the designation does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the designation occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the Orion does not occur.; sent13 & sent2 -> int6: the unpopularness occurs and the pedesis happens.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the unpopularness happens is correct.; int5 & int7 -> int8: not the Orion but the unpopularness happens.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the designation occurs the Orion does not occur but the unpopularness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-chloroticness and the sunshine occurs. sent2: the discovery does not occur. sent3: if the jarring wagonwright happens then the countercharge does not occur and the upstage happens. sent4: the designation occurs if both the Orion and the carouse happens. sent5: the fact that the pedesis happens is not wrong. sent6: the equalization does not occur. sent7: that the aftness does not occur is not false if the Glaswegian and the jarring slice happens. sent8: the fact that the pedesis occurs is right if the discovery does not occur. sent9: the arundinaceousness happens and the carousing happens. sent10: that the Orion and the carousing occurs triggers that the designation does not occur. sent11: the non-bolometricness and the enfranchisement happens if the slap occurs. sent12: the fact that the cesareanness does not occur is true. sent13: the unpopularness and the pedesis happens if the discovery does not occur. sent14: the decoupling occurs. sent15: the mindfulness occurs. sent16: that the arundinaceousness occurs is not false. sent17: that the jarring dreamed and the profanedness happens results in that the motivationalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the carousing occurs is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Orion occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the Orion and the carousing occurs.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the designation does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the designation occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the Orion does not occur.; sent13 & sent2 -> int6: the unpopularness occurs and the pedesis happens.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the unpopularness happens is correct.; int5 & int7 -> int8: not the Orion but the unpopularness happens.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__