the ophthalmoscope does rig saccharin.
sent1: the fact that the muffin puts and is not acetylic is not true if the peplum is anxiolytic. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not unclear is true then the muffin is not commons and it is not a kind of a system. sent3: that the phasianid is a chinked and/or it is a anxiolytic does not hold if the petiole is not anxiolytic. sent4: the saccharin is not unclear if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a suburbanite and/or it is a troop is false. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a monarch then the fact that either the antiquity is not a suburbanite or it is a kind of a troop or both is not correct. sent6: the fact that the ophthalmoscope rigs saccharin but it is not a kind of a anxiolytic is incorrect. sent7: the peplum is not acetylic. sent8: the muffin is not a kind of a put if the fact that the phasianid chinks and/or it is anxiolytic is false. sent9: if something does not blaspheme and is acetylic then that it is not proportionate is not false. sent10: if a non-acetylic thing is a put it is a anxiolytic. sent11: something is not a kind of a monarch. sent12: there exists something such that it is a kind of a anxiolytic. sent13: the ophthalmoscope is not unmilitary. sent14: the muffin is proportionate. sent15: if the fact that the ophthalmoscope freckles rhubarb and/or it is not disproportionate does not hold then the peplum is not unmilitary. sent16: if the peplum is not acetylic then it is an inducement that does not freckle rhubarb. sent17: if something is not proportionate then that the fact that the peplum is not unmilitary and is proportionate is not right is not wrong. sent18: if the petiole is a anxiolytic then that the peplum is an inducement and does not freckle rhubarb is not correct. sent19: the ophthalmoscope is not unmilitary and is proportionate if there is something such that it does not put. sent20: if there exists something such that it is not commons the phasianid does not blaspheme and is acetylic. sent21: something does put if that it is a kind of military thing that is proportionate is wrong. sent22: something rigs saccharin if it is unmilitary and it is proportionate. sent23: the ophthalmoscope does not rig saccharin if the petiole does rig saccharin. sent24: if the peplum is not a anxiolytic then the petiole rigs saccharin and/or is a kind of a chinked.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the petiole is a anxiolytic.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: that the peplum is an inducement and does not freckle rhubarb does not hold.; sent16 & sent7 -> int2: the peplum is an inducement but it does not freckle rhubarb.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the petiole is not a kind of a anxiolytic.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the phasianid is a chinked or is a kind of a anxiolytic or both is not true.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the muffin does not put.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not put.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the ophthalmoscope is not unmilitary but it is proportionate.;
the ophthalmoscope does not rig saccharin.
sent21 -> int9: the peplum is a kind of a put if that it is a kind of military thing that is proportionate does not hold.; sent9 -> int10: that if the phasianid does not blaspheme and is not non-acetylic then the phasianid is not proportionate is right.; sent11 & sent5 -> int11: that the antiquity is not a kind of a suburbanite or it troops or both does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is not a suburbanite or it is a troop or both is false.; int12 & sent4 -> int13: the saccharin is not unclear.; int13 -> int14: there are non-unclear things.; int14 & sent2 -> int15: the muffin is not commons and is not a kind of a system.; int15 -> int16: the muffin is not commons.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is not commons.; int17 & sent20 -> int18: the phasianid does not blaspheme and is acetylic.; int10 & int18 -> int19: the phasianid is not proportionate.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it is not proportionate.; int20 & sent17 -> int21: the fact that the peplum is not unmilitary but proportionate is not right.; int9 & int21 -> int22: the peplum is a put.;
$hypothesis$ = the ophthalmoscope does rig saccharin. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the muffin puts and is not acetylic is not true if the peplum is anxiolytic. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not unclear is true then the muffin is not commons and it is not a kind of a system. sent3: that the phasianid is a chinked and/or it is a anxiolytic does not hold if the petiole is not anxiolytic. sent4: the saccharin is not unclear if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a suburbanite and/or it is a troop is false. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a monarch then the fact that either the antiquity is not a suburbanite or it is a kind of a troop or both is not correct. sent6: the fact that the ophthalmoscope rigs saccharin but it is not a kind of a anxiolytic is incorrect. sent7: the peplum is not acetylic. sent8: the muffin is not a kind of a put if the fact that the phasianid chinks and/or it is anxiolytic is false. sent9: if something does not blaspheme and is acetylic then that it is not proportionate is not false. sent10: if a non-acetylic thing is a put it is a anxiolytic. sent11: something is not a kind of a monarch. sent12: there exists something such that it is a kind of a anxiolytic. sent13: the ophthalmoscope is not unmilitary. sent14: the muffin is proportionate. sent15: if the fact that the ophthalmoscope freckles rhubarb and/or it is not disproportionate does not hold then the peplum is not unmilitary. sent16: if the peplum is not acetylic then it is an inducement that does not freckle rhubarb. sent17: if something is not proportionate then that the fact that the peplum is not unmilitary and is proportionate is not right is not wrong. sent18: if the petiole is a anxiolytic then that the peplum is an inducement and does not freckle rhubarb is not correct. sent19: the ophthalmoscope is not unmilitary and is proportionate if there is something such that it does not put. sent20: if there exists something such that it is not commons the phasianid does not blaspheme and is acetylic. sent21: something does put if that it is a kind of military thing that is proportionate is wrong. sent22: something rigs saccharin if it is unmilitary and it is proportionate. sent23: the ophthalmoscope does not rig saccharin if the petiole does rig saccharin. sent24: if the peplum is not a anxiolytic then the petiole rigs saccharin and/or is a kind of a chinked. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the petiole is a anxiolytic.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: that the peplum is an inducement and does not freckle rhubarb does not hold.; sent16 & sent7 -> int2: the peplum is an inducement but it does not freckle rhubarb.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the petiole is not a kind of a anxiolytic.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the phasianid is a chinked or is a kind of a anxiolytic or both is not true.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the muffin does not put.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not put.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the ophthalmoscope is not unmilitary but it is proportionate.; __UNKNOWN__