that something numbers roar and is a tranche does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the tract does not slink obsoleteness and is a prothalamion is wrong then it is a kind of a tranche. sent2: the tract is doubling. sent3: if the tract does double it does number roar. sent4: something doubles if it numbers roar. sent5: that the tract does not slink obsoleteness but it is a prothalamion is incorrect.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the tract does number roar.; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: the tract is a kind of a tranche.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tract does number roar and it is a tranche.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the langur slinks obsoleteness.
sent4 -> int4: the langur is a doubling if the fact that it does number roar is true.;
$hypothesis$ = that something numbers roar and is a tranche does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the tract does not slink obsoleteness and is a prothalamion is wrong then it is a kind of a tranche. sent2: the tract is doubling. sent3: if the tract does double it does number roar. sent4: something doubles if it numbers roar. sent5: that the tract does not slink obsoleteness but it is a prothalamion is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the tract does number roar.; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: the tract is a kind of a tranche.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tract does number roar and it is a tranche.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__