that that the gunmetal does not bury gunmetal and does not abuse cassareep is false is right.
sent1: the gunmetal is not actable if the fact that the caldera is not arundinaceous and it is not actable hold. sent2: if the edaphosaurus is arundinaceous but it does not ladle mountaineering then it is a ethmoid. sent3: if the fact that the edaphosaurus hops shepherd and does not tidy is not wrong the gunmetal does not bury gunmetal. sent4: the heliometer is expiatory but it does not bury Methodism. sent5: the consequence tidies and it is a zoster. sent6: the caldera is not arundinaceous if the canola is not resistive and it is not arundinaceous. sent7: the edaphosaurus is arundinaceous but it does not ladle mountaineering. sent8: if that something abuses cassareep but it is not a glycerite is not true then it does not abuses cassareep. sent9: if the cosmetician is not a ethmoid then the consequence is both not a docket and not a Hooke. sent10: the Ultrasuede hops shepherd. sent11: if the nucleotide is not enzymatic the canola is not resistive and not arundinaceous. sent12: the edaphosaurus is a Hooke and it abuses parallelism. sent13: the consequence is not actable if the edaphosaurus is a kind of a docket that is a ethmoid. sent14: the cosmetician is not a ethmoid if the fact that the Methuselah is not a ethmoid is correct. sent15: the Methuselah does not abuse parallelism if the fact that the heliometer is not a shot and it does not abuse parallelism is not true. sent16: the edaphosaurus is arundinaceous. sent17: the edaphosaurus is not a Hooke if it hops shepherd and is a tidy. sent18: if the consequence is not actable that the gunmetal does not bury gunmetal and it does not abuse cassareep is wrong. sent19: that something does not shoot and does not abuse parallelism is false if it is expiatory. sent20: if the sandstone does not docket then it is laryngopharyngeal. sent21: the nucleotide is not enzymatic. sent22: if something does not abuse parallelism then the fact that it is a kind of a ethmoid and it ladles mountaineering is not correct. sent23: the gunmetal is arundinaceous. sent24: the edaphosaurus is a docket if the fact that it is a glycerite is true. sent25: if something does not hop shepherd then it is a glycerite. sent26: if something is not a kind of a tidy then it hops shepherd and abuses parallelism. sent27: that something abuses cassareep and is not a glycerite is wrong if it is not actable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the edaphosaurus hops shepherd.; sent12 -> int1: the edaphosaurus is a Hooke.; sent25 -> int2: if the edaphosaurus does not hop shepherd then it is a kind of a glycerite.; sent2 & sent7 -> int3: the edaphosaurus is a kind of a ethmoid.;
the gunmetal abuses parallelism.
sent26 -> int4: the gunmetal hops shepherd and abuses parallelism if it does not tidy.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the gunmetal does not bury gunmetal and does not abuse cassareep is false is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the gunmetal is not actable if the fact that the caldera is not arundinaceous and it is not actable hold. sent2: if the edaphosaurus is arundinaceous but it does not ladle mountaineering then it is a ethmoid. sent3: if the fact that the edaphosaurus hops shepherd and does not tidy is not wrong the gunmetal does not bury gunmetal. sent4: the heliometer is expiatory but it does not bury Methodism. sent5: the consequence tidies and it is a zoster. sent6: the caldera is not arundinaceous if the canola is not resistive and it is not arundinaceous. sent7: the edaphosaurus is arundinaceous but it does not ladle mountaineering. sent8: if that something abuses cassareep but it is not a glycerite is not true then it does not abuses cassareep. sent9: if the cosmetician is not a ethmoid then the consequence is both not a docket and not a Hooke. sent10: the Ultrasuede hops shepherd. sent11: if the nucleotide is not enzymatic the canola is not resistive and not arundinaceous. sent12: the edaphosaurus is a Hooke and it abuses parallelism. sent13: the consequence is not actable if the edaphosaurus is a kind of a docket that is a ethmoid. sent14: the cosmetician is not a ethmoid if the fact that the Methuselah is not a ethmoid is correct. sent15: the Methuselah does not abuse parallelism if the fact that the heliometer is not a shot and it does not abuse parallelism is not true. sent16: the edaphosaurus is arundinaceous. sent17: the edaphosaurus is not a Hooke if it hops shepherd and is a tidy. sent18: if the consequence is not actable that the gunmetal does not bury gunmetal and it does not abuse cassareep is wrong. sent19: that something does not shoot and does not abuse parallelism is false if it is expiatory. sent20: if the sandstone does not docket then it is laryngopharyngeal. sent21: the nucleotide is not enzymatic. sent22: if something does not abuse parallelism then the fact that it is a kind of a ethmoid and it ladles mountaineering is not correct. sent23: the gunmetal is arundinaceous. sent24: the edaphosaurus is a docket if the fact that it is a glycerite is true. sent25: if something does not hop shepherd then it is a glycerite. sent26: if something is not a kind of a tidy then it hops shepherd and abuses parallelism. sent27: that something abuses cassareep and is not a glycerite is wrong if it is not actable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the edaphosaurus hops shepherd.; sent12 -> int1: the edaphosaurus is a Hooke.; sent25 -> int2: if the edaphosaurus does not hop shepherd then it is a kind of a glycerite.; sent2 & sent7 -> int3: the edaphosaurus is a kind of a ethmoid.; __UNKNOWN__