there exists something such that if it is irreparable it is a synonymist.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does reciprocate it does unfasten. sent2: something is a Bullfinch if it is a purge. sent3: the MPS is parotid if it is a kind of a nominal. sent4: something reaches if it is a kind of a supernaturalism. sent5: if the MPS is a horseplay then it is a Swanson. sent6: if something is irreparable it is a synonymist. sent7: something is a Munchener if it does philander nip. sent8: that something is a pettiness if it is salamandriform is not wrong. sent9: something belabors MPS if it is a gleam. sent10: if something belabors exigency then it mulcts docility.
sent6 -> int1: the MPS is a kind of a synonymist if it is irreparable.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is a supernaturalism hold then it is a kind of a reach is not incorrect.
sent4 -> int2: if the quadruplet is a supernaturalism then it does reach.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is irreparable it is a synonymist. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does reciprocate it does unfasten. sent2: something is a Bullfinch if it is a purge. sent3: the MPS is parotid if it is a kind of a nominal. sent4: something reaches if it is a kind of a supernaturalism. sent5: if the MPS is a horseplay then it is a Swanson. sent6: if something is irreparable it is a synonymist. sent7: something is a Munchener if it does philander nip. sent8: that something is a pettiness if it is salamandriform is not wrong. sent9: something belabors MPS if it is a gleam. sent10: if something belabors exigency then it mulcts docility. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the MPS is a kind of a synonymist if it is irreparable.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__