the doorplate is not a IPO.
sent1: something is ultramontane if the fact that it is not a flash and it is causative is wrong. sent2: if something that does hike is not nonarbitrary it is a typicality. sent3: if the Davenport is a kind of a typicality then the doorplate is not causative but it is a flash. sent4: if something is a kind of a typicality then the fact that it is not a flash but causative does not hold. sent5: the Davenport flashes. sent6: if something that is a kind of a occidentalism is nonarbitrary it is not a IPO. sent7: if the Davenport is a flash then the drug is causative. sent8: that the hexachlorophene is not a kind of a ultramontane hold if the radial is a occidentalism and it is a Parashurama. sent9: if there exists something such that it is causative and it is a typicality the hexachlorophene does not hike. sent10: if there is something such that it is a kind of a hike the doorplate is a occidentalism. sent11: something is a kind of a IPO if it is not causative and it is a flash. sent12: that the radial is both not a hike and not a ultramontane is not correct if the fact that the hexachlorophene is not a kind of a hike hold. sent13: that if that the radial is both not a hike and not ultramontane is false the doorplate is nonarbitrary is right. sent14: the fact that the fact that the sand is not a lacer but it is a Parashurama hold is not correct. sent15: the fact that if the drug flashes that the Davenport is non-cytogenetic but it does blue laudanum is false is right. sent16: if the drug is a kind of a papilla it is a kind of a typicality. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a lacer and it is a Parashurama is incorrect then the doorplate is a occidentalism. sent18: that the drug is a kind of arbitrary thing that does hike is not right if the hexachlorophene is not a kind of a ultramontane. sent19: the drug is a papilla. sent20: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Siemens that is hypodermal is not true.
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the drug is causative.; sent16 & sent19 -> int2: the drug is a kind of a typicality.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the drug is causative thing that is a typicality is not incorrect.; int3 -> int4: something is causative and it is a typicality.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the hexachlorophene is not a hike.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: that the radial does not hike and it is non-ultramontane does not hold.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the doorplate is nonarbitrary.; sent14 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a lacer and a Parashurama is not right.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the doorplate is a kind of a occidentalism.; int7 & int9 -> int10: that the doorplate is a occidentalism and it is nonarbitrary hold.; sent6 -> int11: if the doorplate is a occidentalism and it is nonarbitrary it is not a IPO.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the pier is ultramontane.
sent1 -> int12: if that the pier is not a flash but it is causative does not hold it is ultramontane.; sent4 -> int13: if the pier is a kind of a typicality then the fact that it is not a flash and is causative is wrong.; sent2 -> int14: if the pier hikes but it is not nonarbitrary it is a typicality.;
$hypothesis$ = the doorplate is not a IPO. ; $context$ = sent1: something is ultramontane if the fact that it is not a flash and it is causative is wrong. sent2: if something that does hike is not nonarbitrary it is a typicality. sent3: if the Davenport is a kind of a typicality then the doorplate is not causative but it is a flash. sent4: if something is a kind of a typicality then the fact that it is not a flash but causative does not hold. sent5: the Davenport flashes. sent6: if something that is a kind of a occidentalism is nonarbitrary it is not a IPO. sent7: if the Davenport is a flash then the drug is causative. sent8: that the hexachlorophene is not a kind of a ultramontane hold if the radial is a occidentalism and it is a Parashurama. sent9: if there exists something such that it is causative and it is a typicality the hexachlorophene does not hike. sent10: if there is something such that it is a kind of a hike the doorplate is a occidentalism. sent11: something is a kind of a IPO if it is not causative and it is a flash. sent12: that the radial is both not a hike and not a ultramontane is not correct if the fact that the hexachlorophene is not a kind of a hike hold. sent13: that if that the radial is both not a hike and not ultramontane is false the doorplate is nonarbitrary is right. sent14: the fact that the fact that the sand is not a lacer but it is a Parashurama hold is not correct. sent15: the fact that if the drug flashes that the Davenport is non-cytogenetic but it does blue laudanum is false is right. sent16: if the drug is a kind of a papilla it is a kind of a typicality. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a lacer and it is a Parashurama is incorrect then the doorplate is a occidentalism. sent18: that the drug is a kind of arbitrary thing that does hike is not right if the hexachlorophene is not a kind of a ultramontane. sent19: the drug is a papilla. sent20: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Siemens that is hypodermal is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the drug is causative.; sent16 & sent19 -> int2: the drug is a kind of a typicality.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the drug is causative thing that is a typicality is not incorrect.; int3 -> int4: something is causative and it is a typicality.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the hexachlorophene is not a hike.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: that the radial does not hike and it is non-ultramontane does not hold.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the doorplate is nonarbitrary.; sent14 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a lacer and a Parashurama is not right.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the doorplate is a kind of a occidentalism.; int7 & int9 -> int10: that the doorplate is a occidentalism and it is nonarbitrary hold.; sent6 -> int11: if the doorplate is a occidentalism and it is nonarbitrary it is not a IPO.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__