the fact that if the Sophist is a sandal then the know-it-all is not a Kwannon or not platyrrhine or both is false.
sent1: that the fact that the know-it-all is not a Kwannon and/or is not a platyrrhine is not wrong if there exists something such that it is not nonpolitical is not wrong. sent2: either the know-it-all is not a Kwannon or it is not a letter or both if there exists something such that it is not nonpolitical. sent3: the know-it-all is not a Kwannon or is a platyrrhine or both if the Sophist is a sandal. sent4: if the socialite administers succade the bushbuck does letter. sent5: there exists something such that it is nonpolitical. sent6: if there is something such that it is not nonpolitical either the know-it-all is not a kind of a Kwannon or it is a platyrrhine or both. sent7: something that is a kind of a lineage or is hypothermic or both does not quieten know-it-all. sent8: if something is a sterilization it is not nonpolitical. sent9: if the Sophist is a sandal then the socialite does administer succade. sent10: if something is a sterilization and/or it is a kind of a letter it is political.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Sophist is a sandal.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the socialite administers succade.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the bushbuck does letter.; int2 -> int3: the bushbuck is a kind of a sterilization and/or it is a letter.; sent10 -> int4: the bushbuck is not nonpolitical if it is either a sterilization or a letter or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the bushbuck is not nonpolitical is not false.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not nonpolitical.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the know-it-all either is not a Kwannon or is non-platyrrhine or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the Sophist is a sandal then the know-it-all is not a Kwannon or not platyrrhine or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the know-it-all is not a Kwannon and/or is not a platyrrhine is not wrong if there exists something such that it is not nonpolitical is not wrong. sent2: either the know-it-all is not a Kwannon or it is not a letter or both if there exists something such that it is not nonpolitical. sent3: the know-it-all is not a Kwannon or is a platyrrhine or both if the Sophist is a sandal. sent4: if the socialite administers succade the bushbuck does letter. sent5: there exists something such that it is nonpolitical. sent6: if there is something such that it is not nonpolitical either the know-it-all is not a kind of a Kwannon or it is a platyrrhine or both. sent7: something that is a kind of a lineage or is hypothermic or both does not quieten know-it-all. sent8: if something is a sterilization it is not nonpolitical. sent9: if the Sophist is a sandal then the socialite does administer succade. sent10: if something is a sterilization and/or it is a kind of a letter it is political. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Sophist is a sandal.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the socialite administers succade.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the bushbuck does letter.; int2 -> int3: the bushbuck is a kind of a sterilization and/or it is a letter.; sent10 -> int4: the bushbuck is not nonpolitical if it is either a sterilization or a letter or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the bushbuck is not nonpolitical is not false.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not nonpolitical.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the know-it-all either is not a Kwannon or is non-platyrrhine or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__