the sendee is a kind of a landline but it is not a kind of a Nestor.
sent1: if the shoring is woody the sendee is a landline. sent2: if something is a kind of a viper the fact that it is not anemometric and it is a walnut is not right. sent3: something is not a withdrawer and it does not account if that it does not surprise Minnesotan is not wrong. sent4: if that the shoring does forage hold then it does not blaspheme Schulz and it is not woody. sent5: the Louvre is not anemometric and it is not a walnut. sent6: that the shoring does not forage hold if the fact that the Minnesotan is anemometric but it is not woody does not hold. sent7: if the fact that that the Minnesotan forages but it does not blaspheme Schulz is false hold then the sendee is not a Nestor. sent8: the sendee blasphemes Schulz. sent9: the cappuccino does not surprise Minnesotan if that the contester is not a Pediocactus and it is not a kind of a mafioso is incorrect. sent10: something is a kind of a Nestor if it is a viper. sent11: if the Louvre is not a viper the radicle is a fluorescent. sent12: if the radicle is a fluorescent then the shoring is woody. sent13: if there exists something such that it does not blaspheme Schulz and is not woody the fact that the radicle is not a fluorescent is true. sent14: the Minnesotan surprises meningocele and is not a fluorescent. sent15: that something is not anemometric and is not a walnut is false if it is a viper. sent16: the fact that the Louvre is not anemometric but it is a walnut is not true if it is a viper. sent17: the fact that the contester is both not a Pediocactus and not a mafioso is not true. sent18: something is a kind of a viper if the fact that it is not a fluorescent is true. sent19: that something is anemometric but it is not a walnut does not hold if the fact that it is a viper is not wrong. sent20: the Louvre does not blaspheme venom and is not Boolean. sent21: if there exists something such that it is not a withdrawer then the bister is not a lobed and does not blaspheme favored. sent22: if the radicle is a walnut then the fact that it is non-anemometric thing that is not a fluorescent does not hold. sent23: the Minnesotan does forage if the bister is not a lobed. sent24: there is nothing such that it does forage and it does not blaspheme Schulz.
sent15 -> int1: if the fact that the Louvre is a viper hold then the fact that it is not anemometric and it is not a walnut is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Louvre is a viper is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Louvre is not anemometric and it is not a walnut is not right.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Louvre is not a kind of a viper.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the radicle is a fluorescent.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the shoring is woody.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the sendee is a landline.; sent24 -> int8: that the Minnesotan forages and does not blaspheme Schulz is not true.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the sendee is not a kind of a Nestor.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the outwork is a Nestor.
sent10 -> int10: the outwork is a kind of a Nestor if it is a viper.;
$hypothesis$ = the sendee is a kind of a landline but it is not a kind of a Nestor. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shoring is woody the sendee is a landline. sent2: if something is a kind of a viper the fact that it is not anemometric and it is a walnut is not right. sent3: something is not a withdrawer and it does not account if that it does not surprise Minnesotan is not wrong. sent4: if that the shoring does forage hold then it does not blaspheme Schulz and it is not woody. sent5: the Louvre is not anemometric and it is not a walnut. sent6: that the shoring does not forage hold if the fact that the Minnesotan is anemometric but it is not woody does not hold. sent7: if the fact that that the Minnesotan forages but it does not blaspheme Schulz is false hold then the sendee is not a Nestor. sent8: the sendee blasphemes Schulz. sent9: the cappuccino does not surprise Minnesotan if that the contester is not a Pediocactus and it is not a kind of a mafioso is incorrect. sent10: something is a kind of a Nestor if it is a viper. sent11: if the Louvre is not a viper the radicle is a fluorescent. sent12: if the radicle is a fluorescent then the shoring is woody. sent13: if there exists something such that it does not blaspheme Schulz and is not woody the fact that the radicle is not a fluorescent is true. sent14: the Minnesotan surprises meningocele and is not a fluorescent. sent15: that something is not anemometric and is not a walnut is false if it is a viper. sent16: the fact that the Louvre is not anemometric but it is a walnut is not true if it is a viper. sent17: the fact that the contester is both not a Pediocactus and not a mafioso is not true. sent18: something is a kind of a viper if the fact that it is not a fluorescent is true. sent19: that something is anemometric but it is not a walnut does not hold if the fact that it is a viper is not wrong. sent20: the Louvre does not blaspheme venom and is not Boolean. sent21: if there exists something such that it is not a withdrawer then the bister is not a lobed and does not blaspheme favored. sent22: if the radicle is a walnut then the fact that it is non-anemometric thing that is not a fluorescent does not hold. sent23: the Minnesotan does forage if the bister is not a lobed. sent24: there is nothing such that it does forage and it does not blaspheme Schulz. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if the fact that the Louvre is a viper hold then the fact that it is not anemometric and it is not a walnut is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Louvre is a viper is true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Louvre is not anemometric and it is not a walnut is not right.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Louvre is not a kind of a viper.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the radicle is a fluorescent.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the shoring is woody.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the sendee is a landline.; sent24 -> int8: that the Minnesotan forages and does not blaspheme Schulz is not true.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the sendee is not a kind of a Nestor.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__