the lepidomelane is fearful but it is not a guilloche.
sent1: if something is not a freeloader but bracteal then it styles Ambystomatidae. sent2: if the lepidomelane is traumatic the delinquent is fearful. sent3: if something styles Ambystomatidae then it is fearful. sent4: the delinquent is traumatic. sent5: if the fact that the delinquent is a guilloche is not wrong the fact that the lepidomelane is a kind of traumatic thing that is fearful is not correct. sent6: the fact that the lepidomelane is fearful but it is not a guilloche is not true if the fact that the caribou mellows chivalry is right. sent7: that something does style Ambystomatidae and it is traumatic is not true if it is not a freeloader. sent8: the fact that the caribou mellows chivalry is right if the delinquent is traumatic. sent9: something is fearful and it mellows chivalry if it is not bracteal. sent10: if the lepidomelane is fearful the fact that the delinquent is traumatic but it is not a guilloche is not right. sent11: something is not a guilloche if it is not traumatic. sent12: if that the caribou does mellow chivalry is true then the fact that the lepidomelane is both fearful and a guilloche is not correct. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-traumatic and it is not a guilloche is not true the pin does mellow chivalry. sent14: the fact that the fact that the lepidomelane is a kind of fearful a guilloche is not wrong is not right. sent15: the intercourse is traumatic. sent16: if something that does not style Ambystomatidae is not bracteal then that the delinquent does not mellow chivalry is not incorrect. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it styles Ambystomatidae and it is traumatic does not hold the lepidomelane is not traumatic.
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the caribou mellows chivalry is correct.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the lepidomelane is fearful and not a guilloche.
$hypothesis$ = the lepidomelane is fearful but it is not a guilloche. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a freeloader but bracteal then it styles Ambystomatidae. sent2: if the lepidomelane is traumatic the delinquent is fearful. sent3: if something styles Ambystomatidae then it is fearful. sent4: the delinquent is traumatic. sent5: if the fact that the delinquent is a guilloche is not wrong the fact that the lepidomelane is a kind of traumatic thing that is fearful is not correct. sent6: the fact that the lepidomelane is fearful but it is not a guilloche is not true if the fact that the caribou mellows chivalry is right. sent7: that something does style Ambystomatidae and it is traumatic is not true if it is not a freeloader. sent8: the fact that the caribou mellows chivalry is right if the delinquent is traumatic. sent9: something is fearful and it mellows chivalry if it is not bracteal. sent10: if the lepidomelane is fearful the fact that the delinquent is traumatic but it is not a guilloche is not right. sent11: something is not a guilloche if it is not traumatic. sent12: if that the caribou does mellow chivalry is true then the fact that the lepidomelane is both fearful and a guilloche is not correct. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-traumatic and it is not a guilloche is not true the pin does mellow chivalry. sent14: the fact that the fact that the lepidomelane is a kind of fearful a guilloche is not wrong is not right. sent15: the intercourse is traumatic. sent16: if something that does not style Ambystomatidae is not bracteal then that the delinquent does not mellow chivalry is not incorrect. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it styles Ambystomatidae and it is traumatic does not hold the lepidomelane is not traumatic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the caribou mellows chivalry is correct.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__