the atonalisticness happens.
sent1: the leaching typing occurs if the leaching philodendron does not occur. sent2: the irreversibleness does not occur if that the puncturing does not occur but the irreversibleness occurs is wrong. sent3: the settling does not occur. sent4: the psychoanalyticalness occurs. sent5: the laziness occurs and the psychoanalyticalness happens. sent6: that the fact that the fact that the laziness does not occur and the leaching philodendron happens is right is not true is not false if the psychoanalyticalness does not occur. sent7: both the non-hydrodynamicsness and the cholecystectomy occurs. sent8: that the laziness does not occur is triggered by that the puncturing happens and the leaching philodendron occurs. sent9: the settling does not occur if that not the laziness but the leaching philodendron occurs is wrong. sent10: the settling does not occur and the puncture happens. sent11: that that the puncturing does not occur and the irreversibleness occurs is wrong if the settling does not occur is true.
sent10 -> int1: the puncturing occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leaching philodendron happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the puncturing occurs and the leaching philodendron occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the laziness does not occur.; sent5 -> int4: the laziness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the leaching philodendron does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the leaching typing occurs.;
both the non-irreversibleness and the haircut occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the atonalisticness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the leaching typing occurs if the leaching philodendron does not occur. sent2: the irreversibleness does not occur if that the puncturing does not occur but the irreversibleness occurs is wrong. sent3: the settling does not occur. sent4: the psychoanalyticalness occurs. sent5: the laziness occurs and the psychoanalyticalness happens. sent6: that the fact that the fact that the laziness does not occur and the leaching philodendron happens is right is not true is not false if the psychoanalyticalness does not occur. sent7: both the non-hydrodynamicsness and the cholecystectomy occurs. sent8: that the laziness does not occur is triggered by that the puncturing happens and the leaching philodendron occurs. sent9: the settling does not occur if that not the laziness but the leaching philodendron occurs is wrong. sent10: the settling does not occur and the puncture happens. sent11: that that the puncturing does not occur and the irreversibleness occurs is wrong if the settling does not occur is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the puncturing occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leaching philodendron happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the puncturing occurs and the leaching philodendron occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the laziness does not occur.; sent5 -> int4: the laziness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the leaching philodendron does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the leaching typing occurs.; __UNKNOWN__