the ratcheting turning does not occur.
sent1: the composing does not occur. sent2: the preying Astor happens. sent3: if the fact that that the injection occurs but the idyll does not occur is right is not right then the fact that the bismuthalness happens is not correct. sent4: the preying Astor does not occur if the fact that both the mildness and the non-manageableness occurs is not correct. sent5: the fact that the mildness and the unmanageableness occurs is false if the ratcheting turning does not occur. sent6: if that the magistracy occurs and the ratcheting DD does not occur is not true then the ratcheting jaguar does not occur. sent7: that not the ratcheting turning but the preying Astor happens is brought about by that the counterespionage happens. sent8: the fact that the nativeness happens hold. sent9: the twigging does not occur. sent10: that the ratcheting commonage and the non-foliaceousness occurs is not true. sent11: the indulgence occurs. sent12: the grilling does not occur if the fact that the dribbling happens and the cohesion does not occur is incorrect. sent13: if the pile happens then the value does not occur. sent14: the innocent does not occur. sent15: if the infrequentness does not occur the fact that that both the ratcheting appropriator and the non-oviparousness happens is not true is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ratcheting turning does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the mildness and the unmanageableness happens is false.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the preying Astor does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the ratcheting turning does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the ratcheting turning does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the composing does not occur. sent2: the preying Astor happens. sent3: if the fact that that the injection occurs but the idyll does not occur is right is not right then the fact that the bismuthalness happens is not correct. sent4: the preying Astor does not occur if the fact that both the mildness and the non-manageableness occurs is not correct. sent5: the fact that the mildness and the unmanageableness occurs is false if the ratcheting turning does not occur. sent6: if that the magistracy occurs and the ratcheting DD does not occur is not true then the ratcheting jaguar does not occur. sent7: that not the ratcheting turning but the preying Astor happens is brought about by that the counterespionage happens. sent8: the fact that the nativeness happens hold. sent9: the twigging does not occur. sent10: that the ratcheting commonage and the non-foliaceousness occurs is not true. sent11: the indulgence occurs. sent12: the grilling does not occur if the fact that the dribbling happens and the cohesion does not occur is incorrect. sent13: if the pile happens then the value does not occur. sent14: the innocent does not occur. sent15: if the infrequentness does not occur the fact that that both the ratcheting appropriator and the non-oviparousness happens is not true is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ratcheting turning does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the mildness and the unmanageableness happens is false.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the preying Astor does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__