the progestationalness happens.
sent1: the clown occurs. sent2: the non-bignoniaceousness triggers that the testifying Rana does not occur and the spending preexistence does not occur. sent3: the fact that the progestationalness happens but the testifying Rana does not occur if the spending preexistence occurs is correct. sent4: the spending classic occurs. sent5: the testifying Rana happens if the spending classic occurs. sent6: the progestationalness is triggered by that the testifying Rana occurs. sent7: the fact that the steadyingness occurs hold if the acapnicness occurs.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the testifying Rana occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the juncture occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the progestationalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the clown occurs. sent2: the non-bignoniaceousness triggers that the testifying Rana does not occur and the spending preexistence does not occur. sent3: the fact that the progestationalness happens but the testifying Rana does not occur if the spending preexistence occurs is correct. sent4: the spending classic occurs. sent5: the testifying Rana happens if the spending classic occurs. sent6: the progestationalness is triggered by that the testifying Rana occurs. sent7: the fact that the steadyingness occurs hold if the acapnicness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the testifying Rana occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__