there exists something such that if it is a symbology and a Solenostemon then it is not starchy.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is both anoxic and a Ladyship it does fowl. sent2: if the japan is starchy and it does theme raven it is not a probability. sent3: if something is starchy and it is a kind of a trammel it is not monatomic. sent4: if the la does knit capstan and it is abiogenetic the fact that it is starchy is correct. sent5: if the Drambuie trivializes Nativity and it knits prophet it does not convene. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a gallamine and trivializes Samoyedic it crossbreeds. sent7: there exists something such that if it does trivialize camping and is a kind of a waddle then it is not phonetic. sent8: that the Drambuie is not the conservation if the Drambuie themes transducer and is an excise hold. sent9: the mealybug is not a kind of a symbology if it is a kind of a pyxidium and it is a mock. sent10: the Drambuie is not a kind of an objective if it is starchy and it is a revisionism. sent11: there exists something such that if it is both a mock and a magnetron it piddles. sent12: the Drambuie is not starchy if it is a symbology and a Solenostemon. sent13: if the attache is a Ladyship and it is an objective then it does not daydream. sent14: there is something such that if it is expiatory and is cerebral then it does not excise. sent15: there is something such that if it does theme Comstock and it is a daphne then it is dextral. sent16: there is something such that if it coos and it does launder that it is a uncial is correct.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
if the Ionian is not non-starchy and it is a trammel it is not monatomic.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a symbology and a Solenostemon then it is not starchy. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is both anoxic and a Ladyship it does fowl. sent2: if the japan is starchy and it does theme raven it is not a probability. sent3: if something is starchy and it is a kind of a trammel it is not monatomic. sent4: if the la does knit capstan and it is abiogenetic the fact that it is starchy is correct. sent5: if the Drambuie trivializes Nativity and it knits prophet it does not convene. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a gallamine and trivializes Samoyedic it crossbreeds. sent7: there exists something such that if it does trivialize camping and is a kind of a waddle then it is not phonetic. sent8: that the Drambuie is not the conservation if the Drambuie themes transducer and is an excise hold. sent9: the mealybug is not a kind of a symbology if it is a kind of a pyxidium and it is a mock. sent10: the Drambuie is not a kind of an objective if it is starchy and it is a revisionism. sent11: there exists something such that if it is both a mock and a magnetron it piddles. sent12: the Drambuie is not starchy if it is a symbology and a Solenostemon. sent13: if the attache is a Ladyship and it is an objective then it does not daydream. sent14: there is something such that if it is expiatory and is cerebral then it does not excise. sent15: there is something such that if it does theme Comstock and it is a daphne then it is dextral. sent16: there is something such that if it coos and it does launder that it is a uncial is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__