the annuitant is not a kind of a aerophile and is a eventration.
sent1: the bagger is a kind of non-microelectronic thing that does not drag ploy. sent2: that the annuitant is not a kind of a fabric but it is vaginal is right. sent3: if the annuitant does qualify then the fact that the bagger is not a eventration hold. sent4: if the bagger is a Lappland then it is a clone and it does not tweet helium. sent5: the annuitant is not a aerophile if there are vaginal things. sent6: that the annuitant is not a aerophile but it is a kind of a eventration if the bagger qualifies is not wrong. sent7: if the fact that the hindlimb is not a aerophile is true then the annuitant is not non-vaginal. sent8: the fact that something is both not a aerophile and a eventration does not hold if it does put Carpinus. sent9: the bagger qualifies if the hindlimb is not vaginal. sent10: something qualifies. sent11: the annuitant does not put Carpinus. sent12: the bagger is a Lappland if it is not microelectronic and does not drag ploy. sent13: that that the hindlimb is both a solfa and not Shona does not hold if there exists something such that it is a clone hold. sent14: if the bagger qualifies then the annuitant is not a kind of a aerophile. sent15: the shim does not qualify if the fact that the lamb qualify and is not a solfa is not right. sent16: there exists something such that it does put Carpinus. sent17: the fact that the bagger is not vaginal and it does not put Carpinus is not true if there exists something such that it does not qualify. sent18: that something qualifies and/or it is vaginal is right if it is not a solfa. sent19: everything is a Shona and it does clone. sent20: if something puts Carpinus either it is not a eventration or it is vaginal or both. sent21: if the fact that something is both a solfa and not a Shona does not hold it is not a solfa. sent22: the annuitant is not a aerophile. sent23: the fact that the hindlimb is euphoric is not wrong.
the fact that the annuitant is not a aerophile and is a eventration is false.
sent19 -> int1: the Ichyostega is a Shona and it is a clone.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the Ichyostega clones hold.; int2 -> int3: everything does clone.; int3 -> int4: the baneberry clones.;
$hypothesis$ = the annuitant is not a kind of a aerophile and is a eventration. ; $context$ = sent1: the bagger is a kind of non-microelectronic thing that does not drag ploy. sent2: that the annuitant is not a kind of a fabric but it is vaginal is right. sent3: if the annuitant does qualify then the fact that the bagger is not a eventration hold. sent4: if the bagger is a Lappland then it is a clone and it does not tweet helium. sent5: the annuitant is not a aerophile if there are vaginal things. sent6: that the annuitant is not a aerophile but it is a kind of a eventration if the bagger qualifies is not wrong. sent7: if the fact that the hindlimb is not a aerophile is true then the annuitant is not non-vaginal. sent8: the fact that something is both not a aerophile and a eventration does not hold if it does put Carpinus. sent9: the bagger qualifies if the hindlimb is not vaginal. sent10: something qualifies. sent11: the annuitant does not put Carpinus. sent12: the bagger is a Lappland if it is not microelectronic and does not drag ploy. sent13: that that the hindlimb is both a solfa and not Shona does not hold if there exists something such that it is a clone hold. sent14: if the bagger qualifies then the annuitant is not a kind of a aerophile. sent15: the shim does not qualify if the fact that the lamb qualify and is not a solfa is not right. sent16: there exists something such that it does put Carpinus. sent17: the fact that the bagger is not vaginal and it does not put Carpinus is not true if there exists something such that it does not qualify. sent18: that something qualifies and/or it is vaginal is right if it is not a solfa. sent19: everything is a Shona and it does clone. sent20: if something puts Carpinus either it is not a eventration or it is vaginal or both. sent21: if the fact that something is both a solfa and not a Shona does not hold it is not a solfa. sent22: the annuitant is not a aerophile. sent23: the fact that the hindlimb is euphoric is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__