that the extinguishableness occurs and the rejoicing occurs is caused by that the grasping Pretender does not occur.
sent1: the glazing saltire does not occur. sent2: that the moping occurs is triggered by the chill. sent3: if the acceptance does not occur then the meeting occurs. sent4: the multilaneness occurs. sent5: the fact that the consisting does not occur is true. sent6: the three-hitter occurs. sent7: the grasping bonbon does not occur and the microscopy does not occur. sent8: the chilling is triggered by that the grasping Pretender does not occur and the episcopalness does not occur. sent9: that the chill does not occur is prevented by that the grasping Pretender but not the episcopalness occurs. sent10: the politicalness does not occur. sent11: that the episcopalness does not occur is correct. sent12: the subtilizing confidence does not occur. sent13: that the acceptance does not occur triggers that the puerileness occurs and the meeting occurs. sent14: the fossorialness occurs. sent15: if the moping occurs the extinguishableness occurs. sent16: the seduction occurs. sent17: the meeting happens. sent18: that the grasping Pretender happens leads to that the extinguishableness and the rejoicing happens. sent19: the acceptance does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grasping Pretender does not occur.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: the grasping Pretender does not occur and the episcopalness does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the chilling occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the moping occurs.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the extinguishableness occurs.; sent13 & sent19 -> int5: both the puerileness and the meeting happens.; int5 -> int6: the puerileness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that the extinguishableness occurs and the rejoicing occurs is caused by that the grasping Pretender does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the glazing saltire does not occur. sent2: that the moping occurs is triggered by the chill. sent3: if the acceptance does not occur then the meeting occurs. sent4: the multilaneness occurs. sent5: the fact that the consisting does not occur is true. sent6: the three-hitter occurs. sent7: the grasping bonbon does not occur and the microscopy does not occur. sent8: the chilling is triggered by that the grasping Pretender does not occur and the episcopalness does not occur. sent9: that the chill does not occur is prevented by that the grasping Pretender but not the episcopalness occurs. sent10: the politicalness does not occur. sent11: that the episcopalness does not occur is correct. sent12: the subtilizing confidence does not occur. sent13: that the acceptance does not occur triggers that the puerileness occurs and the meeting occurs. sent14: the fossorialness occurs. sent15: if the moping occurs the extinguishableness occurs. sent16: the seduction occurs. sent17: the meeting happens. sent18: that the grasping Pretender happens leads to that the extinguishableness and the rejoicing happens. sent19: the acceptance does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grasping Pretender does not occur.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: the grasping Pretender does not occur and the episcopalness does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the chilling occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the moping occurs.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the extinguishableness occurs.; sent13 & sent19 -> int5: both the puerileness and the meeting happens.; int5 -> int6: the puerileness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__