the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a threadfin it is unthematic is incorrect.
sent1: if something is a sally then it is a lure. sent2: the batik does Simonize Rousseau. sent3: if the batik is a kind of a teak then it does not take and it is a thermojunction. sent4: the batik is thermionics. sent5: the batik is not a teak if it is a threadfin. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a teak it is a threadfin. sent7: the batik is not a kind of a teak but it is unthematic if it is a threadfin. sent8: something is a kind of a sally if the fact that it is not a Milanese and it is not a kind of a sally is wrong. sent9: the packinghouse is a kind of a conifer if the batik is a lure. sent10: the batik is not a kind of a teak. sent11: the fact that the Chardonnay is a teak is not wrong. sent12: the batik does not Simonize hart if it is thermionics. sent13: something is a threadfin if it is a conifer. sent14: the batik is not a lure but it is a threadfin if it is thermionics. sent15: the ethyl is not a Cyrillic but it is a threadfin. sent16: the cockateel does not tusk Tyr but it is unthematic if it unbuttons rutabaga. sent17: if the batik is a threadfin then it does not open Heterotheca and does Simonize fistula.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the batik is a kind of a threadfin.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the batik is not a teak and is unthematic.; int1 -> int2: the batik is unthematic.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the batik is a kind of a threadfin then the fact that it is unthematic is true.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the packinghouse is not a kind of a Cassirer and does Simonize hart.
sent13 -> int4: the packinghouse is a threadfin if it is a kind of a conifer.; sent1 -> int5: that the batik is a lure hold if it is a sally.; sent8 -> int6: the batik is a sally if the fact that it is a kind of non-Milanese thing that is not a sally is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a threadfin it is unthematic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a sally then it is a lure. sent2: the batik does Simonize Rousseau. sent3: if the batik is a kind of a teak then it does not take and it is a thermojunction. sent4: the batik is thermionics. sent5: the batik is not a teak if it is a threadfin. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a teak it is a threadfin. sent7: the batik is not a kind of a teak but it is unthematic if it is a threadfin. sent8: something is a kind of a sally if the fact that it is not a Milanese and it is not a kind of a sally is wrong. sent9: the packinghouse is a kind of a conifer if the batik is a lure. sent10: the batik is not a kind of a teak. sent11: the fact that the Chardonnay is a teak is not wrong. sent12: the batik does not Simonize hart if it is thermionics. sent13: something is a threadfin if it is a conifer. sent14: the batik is not a lure but it is a threadfin if it is thermionics. sent15: the ethyl is not a Cyrillic but it is a threadfin. sent16: the cockateel does not tusk Tyr but it is unthematic if it unbuttons rutabaga. sent17: if the batik is a threadfin then it does not open Heterotheca and does Simonize fistula. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the batik is a kind of a threadfin.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the batik is not a teak and is unthematic.; int1 -> int2: the batik is unthematic.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: if the batik is a kind of a threadfin then the fact that it is unthematic is true.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__