the chachka is not a size.
sent1: if the operon is a kind of a foe that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium and is not a kind of a foe is not correct. sent2: if something is vernal and not a monotreme it does not immortalize Schumpeter. sent3: the nailer coos entreaty. sent4: the nailer is not a Lolo if that it does not burrow and does not rib latency is false. sent5: if the grouch immortalizes Schumpeter the fact that it does coo entreaty is true. sent6: the grouch does immortalize Schumpeter. sent7: the fact that the fact that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium but it is a kind of a foe hold is not true if the operon is a foe. sent8: if the nailer is not ohmic the chachka is not a size. sent9: The Schumpeter does immortalize grouch. sent10: the operon is vernal and not a monotreme. sent11: if something is not ohmic that it is a kind of dislike thing that is not a baldness is not correct. sent12: that the fact that the grouch does immortalize vanadium but it is not a kind of a foe is right is not correct. sent13: the fact that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium but it is a foe is wrong. sent14: if something is a foe and/or non-ohmic it is a size. sent15: if the nailer is ohmic then the operon is a kind of a foe. sent16: something is not ohmic if the fact that it is ohmic thing that does not immortalize vanadium is false. sent17: if the operon is a kind of a foe that the grouch immortalizes vanadium but it is not a foe is false. sent18: if the fact that something does not immortalize vanadium and is not a foe is not true it does not coo masseuse. sent19: if the nailer does not immortalize vanadium then the chachka is a kind of a foe and/or it is not ohmic. sent20: if the grouch coos entreaty it coos masseuse.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nailer is ohmic.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the operon is a kind of a foe.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium and is not a foe is not right.; sent18 -> int3: if the fact that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium and it is not a foe is false it does not coo masseuse.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the grouch does not coo masseuse.; sent5 & sent6 -> int5: the grouch does coo entreaty.; sent20 & int5 -> int6: the grouch coos masseuse.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the nailer is not ohmic.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the beta-adrenoceptor is both not a like and not a baldness is false is right.
sent11 -> int9: if the beta-adrenoceptor is not ohmic that it is not like and not a baldness is false.; sent16 -> int10: that if that the beta-adrenoceptor is ohmic but it does not immortalize vanadium is false then the beta-adrenoceptor is not ohmic is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the chachka is not a size. ; $context$ = sent1: if the operon is a kind of a foe that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium and is not a kind of a foe is not correct. sent2: if something is vernal and not a monotreme it does not immortalize Schumpeter. sent3: the nailer coos entreaty. sent4: the nailer is not a Lolo if that it does not burrow and does not rib latency is false. sent5: if the grouch immortalizes Schumpeter the fact that it does coo entreaty is true. sent6: the grouch does immortalize Schumpeter. sent7: the fact that the fact that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium but it is a kind of a foe hold is not true if the operon is a foe. sent8: if the nailer is not ohmic the chachka is not a size. sent9: The Schumpeter does immortalize grouch. sent10: the operon is vernal and not a monotreme. sent11: if something is not ohmic that it is a kind of dislike thing that is not a baldness is not correct. sent12: that the fact that the grouch does immortalize vanadium but it is not a kind of a foe is right is not correct. sent13: the fact that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium but it is a foe is wrong. sent14: if something is a foe and/or non-ohmic it is a size. sent15: if the nailer is ohmic then the operon is a kind of a foe. sent16: something is not ohmic if the fact that it is ohmic thing that does not immortalize vanadium is false. sent17: if the operon is a kind of a foe that the grouch immortalizes vanadium but it is not a foe is false. sent18: if the fact that something does not immortalize vanadium and is not a foe is not true it does not coo masseuse. sent19: if the nailer does not immortalize vanadium then the chachka is a kind of a foe and/or it is not ohmic. sent20: if the grouch coos entreaty it coos masseuse. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nailer is ohmic.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the operon is a kind of a foe.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium and is not a foe is not right.; sent18 -> int3: if the fact that the grouch does not immortalize vanadium and it is not a foe is false it does not coo masseuse.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the grouch does not coo masseuse.; sent5 & sent6 -> int5: the grouch does coo entreaty.; sent20 & int5 -> int6: the grouch coos masseuse.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the nailer is not ohmic.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__