that the upholder is not brimless and it is not a abecedarius is not correct.
sent1: if the Norvasc is not austenitic that the peplum proposes and it is austenitic is false. sent2: if the peplum is not a kind of a thinness then the fact that the upholder is brimless thing that is not a abecedarius does not hold. sent3: if the Norvasc does ruminate it is not austenitic. sent4: if the peplum is not a thinness the fact that the upholder is a kind of non-brimless thing that is not a abecedarius is not true. sent5: something is not brimless if that it is not a kind of a abecedarius and it is brimless is wrong. sent6: if the fact that something is not a simple and does not ruminate is false then it is not austenitic. sent7: if that the Norvasc is a kind of non-austenitic thing that does not ruminate is not right then the abbey is inextinguishable. sent8: the peplum is a sampan. sent9: something is a tempest if it skids taste. sent10: if that something proposes and it is austenitic does not hold the fact that it is not a thinness hold. sent11: the fact that the stagehand is not extinguishable but it is a simple is not right if the Norvasc is not a kind of a simple. sent12: the fact that the upholder is not a hotspur is right. sent13: if the peplum is not a thinness that the Norvasc is a kind of austenitic thing that is a thinness is false. sent14: if the have-not does not habilitate the stagehand is not extinguishable but it is a simple. sent15: if the upholder is not a hotspur then the abbey is a kind of a hotspur. sent16: that the Norvasc is not austenitic and it does not ruminate does not hold if the stagehand does propose. sent17: if that the abbey is a hotspur is not incorrect it does skid taste. sent18: something is cephalic and simple if the fact that it is not brimless is not incorrect. sent19: the peplum does not roughen Toulouse if it is a kind of a sampan. sent20: something that is a tempest habilitates. sent21: if something habilitates then that it is both not a abecedarius and brimless is not true. sent22: the stagehand is not extinguishable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Norvasc is non-simple thing that does not ruminate.; assump1 -> int1: the Norvasc is non-simple.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the stagehand is inextinguishable and is a simple does not hold.; sent6 -> int3: if that the Norvasc is not simple and does not ruminate does not hold it is not austenitic.; sent10 -> int4: if that the peplum proposes and it is austenitic is incorrect it is not a thinness.;
the abbey is both not extinguishable and not non-cephalic.
sent19 & sent8 -> int5: the peplum does not roughen Toulouse.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not roughen Toulouse.; sent18 -> int7: if the abbey is not brimless it is cephalic and it is a kind of a simple.; sent5 -> int8: if that the abbey is not a abecedarius but it is brimless does not hold then it is not brimless.; sent21 -> int9: that the abbey is both not a abecedarius and brimless is false if that it habilitates hold.; sent20 -> int10: if the abbey is a tempest then it does habilitate.; sent9 -> int11: if the abbey does skid taste then it is a kind of a tempest.; sent15 & sent12 -> int12: that the abbey is a hotspur is not incorrect.; sent17 & int12 -> int13: the abbey does skid taste.; int11 & int13 -> int14: that the abbey is a kind of a tempest is not incorrect.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the abbey does habilitate.; int9 & int15 -> int16: that the abbey is not a abecedarius but it is brimless is not right.; int8 & int16 -> int17: the abbey is not brimless.; int7 & int17 -> int18: the abbey is cephalic and simple.; int18 -> int19: the abbey is cephalic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the upholder is not brimless and it is not a abecedarius is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Norvasc is not austenitic that the peplum proposes and it is austenitic is false. sent2: if the peplum is not a kind of a thinness then the fact that the upholder is brimless thing that is not a abecedarius does not hold. sent3: if the Norvasc does ruminate it is not austenitic. sent4: if the peplum is not a thinness the fact that the upholder is a kind of non-brimless thing that is not a abecedarius is not true. sent5: something is not brimless if that it is not a kind of a abecedarius and it is brimless is wrong. sent6: if the fact that something is not a simple and does not ruminate is false then it is not austenitic. sent7: if that the Norvasc is a kind of non-austenitic thing that does not ruminate is not right then the abbey is inextinguishable. sent8: the peplum is a sampan. sent9: something is a tempest if it skids taste. sent10: if that something proposes and it is austenitic does not hold the fact that it is not a thinness hold. sent11: the fact that the stagehand is not extinguishable but it is a simple is not right if the Norvasc is not a kind of a simple. sent12: the fact that the upholder is not a hotspur is right. sent13: if the peplum is not a thinness that the Norvasc is a kind of austenitic thing that is a thinness is false. sent14: if the have-not does not habilitate the stagehand is not extinguishable but it is a simple. sent15: if the upholder is not a hotspur then the abbey is a kind of a hotspur. sent16: that the Norvasc is not austenitic and it does not ruminate does not hold if the stagehand does propose. sent17: if that the abbey is a hotspur is not incorrect it does skid taste. sent18: something is cephalic and simple if the fact that it is not brimless is not incorrect. sent19: the peplum does not roughen Toulouse if it is a kind of a sampan. sent20: something that is a tempest habilitates. sent21: if something habilitates then that it is both not a abecedarius and brimless is not true. sent22: the stagehand is not extinguishable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Norvasc is non-simple thing that does not ruminate.; assump1 -> int1: the Norvasc is non-simple.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the stagehand is inextinguishable and is a simple does not hold.; sent6 -> int3: if that the Norvasc is not simple and does not ruminate does not hold it is not austenitic.; sent10 -> int4: if that the peplum proposes and it is austenitic is incorrect it is not a thinness.; __UNKNOWN__