the bitmap is a framing that is not nonreversible.
sent1: if something does not pitch Asama the fact that it is submersible thing that is amniotic does not hold. sent2: if the darner is a kind of a Cystophora and is not a caesura then it is not a kind of an approach. sent3: if the fact that the fact that something is both submersible and amniotic hold is wrong it is not amniotic. sent4: the etcher is awkward thing that is nonreversible if that the postgraduate is not amniotic hold. sent5: if that the bitmap is an approach and does not frame is not right the call-board is a frame. sent6: the postgraduate does not pitch Asama if the fact that it is a kind of a anteroom and does not piffle does not hold. sent7: that the darner is not a kind of a Cystophora but it is a caesura is not correct. sent8: the call-board does pitch Asama and it is a anteroom. sent9: if the call-board does pitch Asama it is amniotic. sent10: if that something is not a Cystophora but it is a kind of a caesura does not hold it piffles. sent11: if there is something such that it does piffle then the postgraduate is not an approach but it is a submersible. sent12: the call-board is awkward. sent13: the darner is a Cystophora but it is not a caesura. sent14: the call-board is not an approach if the postgraduate is not an approach and is a submersible. sent15: the bitmap does frame if the call-board is awkward. sent16: the fact that the postgraduate is a anteroom but it does not piffle is wrong. sent17: if that the fact that the bitmap is both amniotic and nonreversible hold is incorrect it is not nonreversible. sent18: if something is not awkward then that it frames and is not nonreversible is not right. sent19: that the bitmap is an approach and does not frame is false if there exists something such that it does not approach.
sent15 & sent12 -> int1: that the bitmap is a kind of a framing is not false.;
the etcher is nonreversible and does not powwow holometabolism.
sent3 -> int2: if that the postgraduate is a kind of a submersible and it is amniotic is not true it is not amniotic.; sent1 -> int3: that the postgraduate is a submersible and it is amniotic is not right if it does not pitch Asama.; sent6 & sent16 -> int4: the postgraduate does not pitch Asama.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the postgraduate is a submersible and is not non-amniotic does not hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the postgraduate is not amniotic.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the etcher is awkward and it is nonreversible.; int7 -> int8: the etcher is nonreversible.; sent2 & sent13 -> int9: the darner does not approach.; int9 -> int10: something is not a kind of an approach.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: that the bitmap is both an approach and not a framing is wrong.; sent5 & int11 -> int12: the call-board is a framing.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a framing is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the bitmap is a framing that is not nonreversible. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not pitch Asama the fact that it is submersible thing that is amniotic does not hold. sent2: if the darner is a kind of a Cystophora and is not a caesura then it is not a kind of an approach. sent3: if the fact that the fact that something is both submersible and amniotic hold is wrong it is not amniotic. sent4: the etcher is awkward thing that is nonreversible if that the postgraduate is not amniotic hold. sent5: if that the bitmap is an approach and does not frame is not right the call-board is a frame. sent6: the postgraduate does not pitch Asama if the fact that it is a kind of a anteroom and does not piffle does not hold. sent7: that the darner is not a kind of a Cystophora but it is a caesura is not correct. sent8: the call-board does pitch Asama and it is a anteroom. sent9: if the call-board does pitch Asama it is amniotic. sent10: if that something is not a Cystophora but it is a kind of a caesura does not hold it piffles. sent11: if there is something such that it does piffle then the postgraduate is not an approach but it is a submersible. sent12: the call-board is awkward. sent13: the darner is a Cystophora but it is not a caesura. sent14: the call-board is not an approach if the postgraduate is not an approach and is a submersible. sent15: the bitmap does frame if the call-board is awkward. sent16: the fact that the postgraduate is a anteroom but it does not piffle is wrong. sent17: if that the fact that the bitmap is both amniotic and nonreversible hold is incorrect it is not nonreversible. sent18: if something is not awkward then that it frames and is not nonreversible is not right. sent19: that the bitmap is an approach and does not frame is false if there exists something such that it does not approach. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent12 -> int1: that the bitmap is a kind of a framing is not false.; __UNKNOWN__