if the considering Equisetum occurs then the cenobiticness does not occur and the arriving does not occur.
sent1: that the arriving does not occur is caused by that the appellativeness does not occur and/or the amortization. sent2: the serenading one-fifth happens. sent3: if the pedagogicalness occurs then the fact that the non-appellativeness or the amortization or both occurs hold. sent4: if that both the cenobiticness and the serenading one-fifth happens is correct then the considering Equisetum does not occur. sent5: the pedagogicalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cenobiticness happens is true.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the cenobiticness and the serenading one-fifth happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the considering Equisetum does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the considering Equisetum occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the cenobiticness does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int5: the non-appellativeness or the amortization or both occurs.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the arriving does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the cenobiticness does not occur and the arriving does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the considering Equisetum occurs then the cenobiticness does not occur and the arriving does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the arriving does not occur is caused by that the appellativeness does not occur and/or the amortization. sent2: the serenading one-fifth happens. sent3: if the pedagogicalness occurs then the fact that the non-appellativeness or the amortization or both occurs hold. sent4: if that both the cenobiticness and the serenading one-fifth happens is correct then the considering Equisetum does not occur. sent5: the pedagogicalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cenobiticness happens is true.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the cenobiticness and the serenading one-fifth happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the considering Equisetum does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the considering Equisetum occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the cenobiticness does not occur.; sent3 & sent5 -> int5: the non-appellativeness or the amortization or both occurs.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the arriving does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the cenobiticness does not occur and the arriving does not occur.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__