the kenneling fivepence happens.
sent1: the fact that the caramelizing occurs and the Draconianness does not occur is wrong if the play does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the pinch happens and the Draconianness does not occur is false then the pinch does not occur. sent3: the forcelessness occurs. sent4: if the fact that not the evangelicalness but the disappearing occurs is false the caramelizing happens. sent5: that the artillery happens is prevented by that the non-exergonicness and the non-leanness happens. sent6: if the artillery does not occur the fact that the whist does not occur and the scorching dandelion does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the whist does not occur and the scorching dandelion does not occur is not true the scorching dandelion happens. sent8: if the Draconianness happens then the kenneling fivepence happens. sent9: the fact that the play but not the scorching dandelion occurs does not hold. sent10: the non-exergonicness and the non-leanness happens if the transmogrification does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the playing but not the scorching dandelion happens is not right then the playing does not occur. sent12: if the exploration happens the playing does not occur and the caramelizing does not occur. sent13: that not the squiring PKD but the bunco happens is not correct. sent14: that both the non-evangelicalness and the disappearing occurs is wrong.
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the caramelizing occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Draconianness does not occur is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the caramelizing but not the Draconianness occurs.; sent11 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the playing does not occur hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the caramelizing occurs but the Draconianness does not occur is not right.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Draconianness happens.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the pinching does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the kenneling fivepence happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the caramelizing occurs and the Draconianness does not occur is wrong if the play does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the pinch happens and the Draconianness does not occur is false then the pinch does not occur. sent3: the forcelessness occurs. sent4: if the fact that not the evangelicalness but the disappearing occurs is false the caramelizing happens. sent5: that the artillery happens is prevented by that the non-exergonicness and the non-leanness happens. sent6: if the artillery does not occur the fact that the whist does not occur and the scorching dandelion does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the whist does not occur and the scorching dandelion does not occur is not true the scorching dandelion happens. sent8: if the Draconianness happens then the kenneling fivepence happens. sent9: the fact that the play but not the scorching dandelion occurs does not hold. sent10: the non-exergonicness and the non-leanness happens if the transmogrification does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the playing but not the scorching dandelion happens is not right then the playing does not occur. sent12: if the exploration happens the playing does not occur and the caramelizing does not occur. sent13: that not the squiring PKD but the bunco happens is not correct. sent14: that both the non-evangelicalness and the disappearing occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the caramelizing occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Draconianness does not occur is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the caramelizing but not the Draconianness occurs.; sent11 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the playing does not occur hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the caramelizing occurs but the Draconianness does not occur is not right.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Draconianness happens.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__