the blueberry does foliate but it does not soldier Garonne.
sent1: if the jam is not philhellenic then that the monocle is a Saek and does not soldier refrain does not hold. sent2: the fact that that something is philhellenic but it is not a dhal is wrong if it is a erythromycin is true. sent3: something is a justification if the fact that it is a kind of a Saek and it does not soldier refrain is wrong. sent4: the jam does negotiate croissant and it is philosophical if something is not a Salvadoran. sent5: if the jam does negotiate croissant and is philosophical then it is not a kind of a dhal. sent6: the blueberry is a kind of foliate thing that does not soldier Garonne if the monocle is a justification. sent7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Salvadoran.
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the jam does negotiate croissant and is philosophical.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the jam is not a dhal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jam is philhellenic.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the jam is philhellenic but it is not a dhal.; sent2 -> int4: if the jam is a erythromycin that it is both not non-philhellenic and not a dhal is incorrect.; sent3 -> int5: the monocle is a justification if the fact that it is a Saek and it does not soldier refrain is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the blueberry does foliate but it does not soldier Garonne. ; $context$ = sent1: if the jam is not philhellenic then that the monocle is a Saek and does not soldier refrain does not hold. sent2: the fact that that something is philhellenic but it is not a dhal is wrong if it is a erythromycin is true. sent3: something is a justification if the fact that it is a kind of a Saek and it does not soldier refrain is wrong. sent4: the jam does negotiate croissant and it is philosophical if something is not a Salvadoran. sent5: if the jam does negotiate croissant and is philosophical then it is not a kind of a dhal. sent6: the blueberry is a kind of foliate thing that does not soldier Garonne if the monocle is a justification. sent7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Salvadoran. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the jam does negotiate croissant and is philosophical.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the jam is not a dhal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jam is philhellenic.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the jam is philhellenic but it is not a dhal.; sent2 -> int4: if the jam is a erythromycin that it is both not non-philhellenic and not a dhal is incorrect.; sent3 -> int5: the monocle is a justification if the fact that it is a Saek and it does not soldier refrain is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__