there is something such that if it does camber gimmickry then the fact that it is not nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation is not correct.
sent1: the fact that something is non-non-metric thing that does not rotate vagus is incorrect if it is nonpsychoactive. sent2: there is something such that if it is a acrylamide the fact that it is not smoky and it is not a despair does not hold. sent3: if the umbrellawort cambers gimmickry then it is not nomothetic and does not rotate distillation. sent4: if something does camber gimmickry then the fact that it is nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation is false. sent5: if something cambers gimmickry the fact that it is not nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation does not hold. sent6: if the umbrellawort cambers gimmickry that it is a kind of non-nomothetic thing that does rotate distillation is false. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of non-nomothetic thing that rotates distillation is false if it does camber gimmickry. sent8: there is something such that if it cambers gimmickry then the fact that it is non-nomothetic and it rotates distillation is not right. sent9: there exists something such that if it does camber gimmickry the fact that it is non-nomothetic thing that does not rotate distillation is not false. sent10: something is not nomothetic and does not rotate distillation if it cambers gimmickry. sent11: the fact that something does not rotate equinox and it is competitive is wrong if it is a kind of a palace. sent12: there exists something such that if it cambers gimmickry the fact that it is nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation does not hold. sent13: if the umbrellawort does camber gimmickry then the fact that it is nomothetic and does not rotate distillation is wrong. sent14: that something is not a IVP and does not prejudice pneumothorax is not right if it is terminal.
sent5 -> int1: that the umbrellawort is not nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation is false if that it does camber gimmickry is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does camber gimmickry then the fact that it is not nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is non-non-metric thing that does not rotate vagus is incorrect if it is nonpsychoactive. sent2: there is something such that if it is a acrylamide the fact that it is not smoky and it is not a despair does not hold. sent3: if the umbrellawort cambers gimmickry then it is not nomothetic and does not rotate distillation. sent4: if something does camber gimmickry then the fact that it is nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation is false. sent5: if something cambers gimmickry the fact that it is not nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation does not hold. sent6: if the umbrellawort cambers gimmickry that it is a kind of non-nomothetic thing that does rotate distillation is false. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of non-nomothetic thing that rotates distillation is false if it does camber gimmickry. sent8: there is something such that if it cambers gimmickry then the fact that it is non-nomothetic and it rotates distillation is not right. sent9: there exists something such that if it does camber gimmickry the fact that it is non-nomothetic thing that does not rotate distillation is not false. sent10: something is not nomothetic and does not rotate distillation if it cambers gimmickry. sent11: the fact that something does not rotate equinox and it is competitive is wrong if it is a kind of a palace. sent12: there exists something such that if it cambers gimmickry the fact that it is nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation does not hold. sent13: if the umbrellawort does camber gimmickry then the fact that it is nomothetic and does not rotate distillation is wrong. sent14: that something is not a IVP and does not prejudice pneumothorax is not right if it is terminal. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that the umbrellawort is not nomothetic and it does not rotate distillation is false if that it does camber gimmickry is true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__