that something sprays assimilation and is a clomiphene is right.
sent1: the fact that the caranday is a kind of a Corixidae and is not a crenel is incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a taurine. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it sprays assimilation and is a kind of a clomiphene is not correct the Bufferin does not crenel. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a taurine then the fact that the caranday is not a kind of a Corixidae and it is not a crenel does not hold. sent4: if the tolu is a stickiness then the Bufferin is a kind of a clomiphene. sent5: the Bufferin splays oology. sent6: that the portraitist does not splay Iapetus hold. sent7: the offerer is not a taurine if the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or does not splay oology. sent8: the offerer is not a kind of a taurine if the Bufferin does not splay oology. sent9: something does spray assimilation if the fact that it is rh-positive and/or it does splay oology is false. sent10: the Bufferin is a Americanism and it is a kind of a taurine if it is not a crenel. sent11: that the caranday is a Americanism if the fact that the Bufferin is a Americanism is true is not incorrect. sent12: that the caranday is a Corixidae but it is not a crenel does not hold. sent13: that the tolu sprays assimilation and it is a clomiphene is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Corixidae. sent15: that the offerer is a Corixidae and not autosomal is not true if it is a kind of a stickiness. sent16: the tolu is a stickiness and it is autosomal if the portraitist does not splay Iapetus. sent17: the caranday is not a Corixidae and it does not crenel. sent18: something is a clomiphene and is a kind of a Corixidae. sent19: That the Iapetus does not splay portraitist hold. sent20: the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or it does splay oology. sent21: the caranday is not a Corixidae. sent22: if that either something is rh-positive or it does not splay oology or both is not right then it does spray assimilation. sent23: something is taurine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or it does not splay oology.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the offerer is not taurine.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a taurine.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the caranday is not a Corixidae and it does not crenel is not true.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or it does not splay oology is wrong.; sent22 -> int6: if that the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or does not splay oology is incorrect it does spray assimilation.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Bufferin does spray assimilation.; sent16 & sent6 -> int8: the tolu is a stickiness and it is autosomal.; int8 -> int9: the tolu is a stickiness.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the Bufferin is a clomiphene.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the Bufferin sprays assimilation and it is a kind of a clomiphene.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the caranday is both a Americanism and autosomal.
sent13 -> int12: there exists something such that that it does spray assimilation and is a clomiphene does not hold.; int12 & sent2 -> int13: the Bufferin does not crenel.; sent10 & int13 -> int14: the Bufferin is a kind of a Americanism that is taurine.; int14 -> int15: the Bufferin is a kind of a Americanism.; sent11 & int15 -> int16: the caranday is a kind of a Americanism.;
$hypothesis$ = that something sprays assimilation and is a clomiphene is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the caranday is a kind of a Corixidae and is not a crenel is incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a taurine. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it sprays assimilation and is a kind of a clomiphene is not correct the Bufferin does not crenel. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a taurine then the fact that the caranday is not a kind of a Corixidae and it is not a crenel does not hold. sent4: if the tolu is a stickiness then the Bufferin is a kind of a clomiphene. sent5: the Bufferin splays oology. sent6: that the portraitist does not splay Iapetus hold. sent7: the offerer is not a taurine if the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or does not splay oology. sent8: the offerer is not a kind of a taurine if the Bufferin does not splay oology. sent9: something does spray assimilation if the fact that it is rh-positive and/or it does splay oology is false. sent10: the Bufferin is a Americanism and it is a kind of a taurine if it is not a crenel. sent11: that the caranday is a Americanism if the fact that the Bufferin is a Americanism is true is not incorrect. sent12: that the caranday is a Corixidae but it is not a crenel does not hold. sent13: that the tolu sprays assimilation and it is a clomiphene is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Corixidae. sent15: that the offerer is a Corixidae and not autosomal is not true if it is a kind of a stickiness. sent16: the tolu is a stickiness and it is autosomal if the portraitist does not splay Iapetus. sent17: the caranday is not a Corixidae and it does not crenel. sent18: something is a clomiphene and is a kind of a Corixidae. sent19: That the Iapetus does not splay portraitist hold. sent20: the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or it does splay oology. sent21: the caranday is not a Corixidae. sent22: if that either something is rh-positive or it does not splay oology or both is not right then it does spray assimilation. sent23: something is taurine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or it does not splay oology.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the offerer is not taurine.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a taurine.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the caranday is not a Corixidae and it does not crenel is not true.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or it does not splay oology is wrong.; sent22 -> int6: if that the Bufferin is rh-positive and/or does not splay oology is incorrect it does spray assimilation.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Bufferin does spray assimilation.; sent16 & sent6 -> int8: the tolu is a stickiness and it is autosomal.; int8 -> int9: the tolu is a stickiness.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the Bufferin is a clomiphene.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the Bufferin sprays assimilation and it is a kind of a clomiphene.; int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__