the vardenafil does not cream inconspicuousness and is not fallible if it is a peneplain.
sent1: the cat's-paw is a kind of non-viceregal thing that is not polyvalent. sent2: the glycerite does not decrease cloudiness but it is contractual. sent3: the vardenafil is a gander if the Hindustani is fallible. sent4: something that creams Hindustani does stake. sent5: something is a kind of a submersible if it does not decrease cloudiness. sent6: the fact that the vardenafil is fallible is correct if it decreases cloudiness. sent7: that the glycerite is contractual but it is not a kind of a peneplain is incorrect if it is a kind of a submersible. sent8: if the fact that the Hindustani is a gander and is not fallible does not hold then the vardenafil is not fallible. sent9: the cat's-paw is ungenerous if the glycerite is a submersible. sent10: that the glycerite is a kind of a submersible but it is not a peneplain is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the vardenafil creams Hindustani is correct if the cat's-paw is ungenerous. sent12: if the Hindustani is viceregal the fact that it is a gander and it is not fallible does not hold. sent13: the Hindustani is not a peneplain if the vardenafil is not viceregal. sent14: the Hindustani is not contractual if it is a kind of a peneplain and it is fallible. sent15: something that is a peneplain and is a stake does not cream inconspicuousness.
sent2 -> int1: the glycerite does not decrease cloudiness.; sent5 -> int2: if the glycerite does not decrease cloudiness it is a kind of a submersible.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the glycerite is a submersible.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the cat's-paw is ungenerous.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the vardenafil does cream Hindustani.; sent4 -> int6: the fact that if the fact that the vardenafil creams Hindustani is true the vardenafil is a kind of a stake is right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the vardenafil is a stake.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vardenafil is a kind of a peneplain.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: the vardenafil is a kind of a peneplain and is a stake.; sent15 -> int9: the vardenafil does not cream inconspicuousness if it is a kind of a peneplain that does stake.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the vardenafil does not cream inconspicuousness is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the vardenafil does not cream inconspicuousness and is not fallible if it is a peneplain. ; $context$ = sent1: the cat's-paw is a kind of non-viceregal thing that is not polyvalent. sent2: the glycerite does not decrease cloudiness but it is contractual. sent3: the vardenafil is a gander if the Hindustani is fallible. sent4: something that creams Hindustani does stake. sent5: something is a kind of a submersible if it does not decrease cloudiness. sent6: the fact that the vardenafil is fallible is correct if it decreases cloudiness. sent7: that the glycerite is contractual but it is not a kind of a peneplain is incorrect if it is a kind of a submersible. sent8: if the fact that the Hindustani is a gander and is not fallible does not hold then the vardenafil is not fallible. sent9: the cat's-paw is ungenerous if the glycerite is a submersible. sent10: that the glycerite is a kind of a submersible but it is not a peneplain is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the vardenafil creams Hindustani is correct if the cat's-paw is ungenerous. sent12: if the Hindustani is viceregal the fact that it is a gander and it is not fallible does not hold. sent13: the Hindustani is not a peneplain if the vardenafil is not viceregal. sent14: the Hindustani is not contractual if it is a kind of a peneplain and it is fallible. sent15: something that is a peneplain and is a stake does not cream inconspicuousness. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the glycerite does not decrease cloudiness.; sent5 -> int2: if the glycerite does not decrease cloudiness it is a kind of a submersible.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the glycerite is a submersible.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the cat's-paw is ungenerous.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the vardenafil does cream Hindustani.; sent4 -> int6: the fact that if the fact that the vardenafil creams Hindustani is true the vardenafil is a kind of a stake is right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the vardenafil is a stake.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vardenafil is a kind of a peneplain.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: the vardenafil is a kind of a peneplain and is a stake.; sent15 -> int9: the vardenafil does not cream inconspicuousness if it is a kind of a peneplain that does stake.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the vardenafil does not cream inconspicuousness is true.; __UNKNOWN__