the scab does not invoke reversible.
sent1: that that something is a slacks or it does not guess blur or both is correct does not hold if the fact that it is a kind of a layman is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that the scab guesses blur is not incorrect if the fact that it is not completed is not incorrect. sent3: the scab is photoemissive but it does not complete if the sycamore complete. sent4: the registrant guesses blur and is not a obsequiousness. sent5: the scab is a obsequiousness but it is not completed. sent6: the registrant does not invoke reversible. sent7: the potter does not guess blur if the fact that the Aeolian is a kind of a greens and it does guess blur is not right. sent8: something does not invoke reversible if it is both photoemissive and not completed. sent9: if the registrant is not a obsequiousness then the fact that the Aeolian is not a layman and is a kind of a greens is not correct. sent10: the registrant does not green if it is a kind of a obsequiousness that does not complete. sent11: the sycamore does not guess blur if the fact that the scab does slack and/or it does not guess blur does not hold. sent12: the Aeolian is not a slacks. sent13: if the Aeolian is a layman that the sycamore does complete is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Aeolian is not a layman.; sent4 -> int1: the registrant is not a obsequiousness.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: that the Aeolian is not a layman but it does green does not hold.; sent8 -> int3: if the scab is both photoemissive and not completed then it does not invoke reversible.;
the potter does not guess blur.
sent1 -> int4: if the scab is a kind of a layman the fact that it is a kind of a slacks and/or it does not guess blur is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the scab does not invoke reversible. ; $context$ = sent1: that that something is a slacks or it does not guess blur or both is correct does not hold if the fact that it is a kind of a layman is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that the scab guesses blur is not incorrect if the fact that it is not completed is not incorrect. sent3: the scab is photoemissive but it does not complete if the sycamore complete. sent4: the registrant guesses blur and is not a obsequiousness. sent5: the scab is a obsequiousness but it is not completed. sent6: the registrant does not invoke reversible. sent7: the potter does not guess blur if the fact that the Aeolian is a kind of a greens and it does guess blur is not right. sent8: something does not invoke reversible if it is both photoemissive and not completed. sent9: if the registrant is not a obsequiousness then the fact that the Aeolian is not a layman and is a kind of a greens is not correct. sent10: the registrant does not green if it is a kind of a obsequiousness that does not complete. sent11: the sycamore does not guess blur if the fact that the scab does slack and/or it does not guess blur does not hold. sent12: the Aeolian is not a slacks. sent13: if the Aeolian is a layman that the sycamore does complete is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Aeolian is not a layman.; sent4 -> int1: the registrant is not a obsequiousness.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: that the Aeolian is not a layman but it does green does not hold.; sent8 -> int3: if the scab is both photoemissive and not completed then it does not invoke reversible.; __UNKNOWN__