the stepson does not jumble lymphangiography.
sent1: the sloganeer personifies damp. sent2: that the lifer jumbles lymphangiography is right. sent3: something curvets if the fact that it is a brake hold. sent4: the meloid does jumble lymphangiography but it is not a introspectiveness if the lifer is not a brake. sent5: that something does not brake and is a kind of a curvet hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a dacryon is correct. sent6: if something is a dacryon but it does not interlock cesium then it is a introspectiveness. sent7: if something does not partition it is a kind of a dacryon that does not interlock cesium. sent8: the stepson does not jumble lymphangiography if the lifer does not jumble lymphangiography and it is not a kind of a brake. sent9: if the fact that something is not a strongbox and is undomestic is wrong it is not a partition. sent10: if the lifer is a kind of a introspectiveness then it brakes. sent11: the lifer is a introspectiveness. sent12: the fact that the melanocyte is both not a strongbox and undomestic is not true if the sloganeer personifies damp. sent13: if a partition does not interlock cesium it is not a dacryon. sent14: if the lifer is not undomestic then it is a partition and it does not interlock cesium. sent15: if the mistflower is not a introspectiveness the lifer does not jumble lymphangiography and it is not a brake. sent16: if the melanocyte is a introspectiveness and it is a kind of a curvet then the mistflower is not a introspectiveness. sent17: the stepson jumbles lymphangiography if the lifer is a kind of a curvet.
sent10 & sent11 -> int1: the lifer is a brake.; sent3 -> int2: if the lifer does brake then it curvets.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lifer is a curvet.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the meloid does jumble lymphangiography.
sent5 -> int4: if the lifer is not a dacryon then it is not a brake and it is a kind of a curvet.; sent13 -> int5: if the lifer is a kind of a partition and does not interlock cesium it is not a dacryon.;
$hypothesis$ = the stepson does not jumble lymphangiography. ; $context$ = sent1: the sloganeer personifies damp. sent2: that the lifer jumbles lymphangiography is right. sent3: something curvets if the fact that it is a brake hold. sent4: the meloid does jumble lymphangiography but it is not a introspectiveness if the lifer is not a brake. sent5: that something does not brake and is a kind of a curvet hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a dacryon is correct. sent6: if something is a dacryon but it does not interlock cesium then it is a introspectiveness. sent7: if something does not partition it is a kind of a dacryon that does not interlock cesium. sent8: the stepson does not jumble lymphangiography if the lifer does not jumble lymphangiography and it is not a kind of a brake. sent9: if the fact that something is not a strongbox and is undomestic is wrong it is not a partition. sent10: if the lifer is a kind of a introspectiveness then it brakes. sent11: the lifer is a introspectiveness. sent12: the fact that the melanocyte is both not a strongbox and undomestic is not true if the sloganeer personifies damp. sent13: if a partition does not interlock cesium it is not a dacryon. sent14: if the lifer is not undomestic then it is a partition and it does not interlock cesium. sent15: if the mistflower is not a introspectiveness the lifer does not jumble lymphangiography and it is not a brake. sent16: if the melanocyte is a introspectiveness and it is a kind of a curvet then the mistflower is not a introspectiveness. sent17: the stepson jumbles lymphangiography if the lifer is a kind of a curvet. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent11 -> int1: the lifer is a brake.; sent3 -> int2: if the lifer does brake then it curvets.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lifer is a curvet.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__