the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is a numbat but not dishonest is not correct is false.
sent1: there exists something such that that it does lather coulomb and does denaturalize scalp does not hold. sent2: the epicenter is a numbat and it sacks if the grivet does not lather Alexander. sent3: if the ingenue denaturalizes scalp it is not a sacking and it lathers Alexander. sent4: if the ingenue does denaturalize scalp it does lather Alexander. sent5: if the camcorder is amitotic then that the grivet is a numbat but it is not dishonest is not right. sent6: the fact that the ingenue is not dishonest and it does not lather Myrtus is not right. sent7: something lathers Myrtus if it lathers Alexander. sent8: if the camcorder is amitotic then the fact that the ingenue lathers coulomb and does denaturalize scalp is incorrect. sent9: the grivet is not dishonest but it is amitotic. sent10: if something hurtles dogging it is a kind of a keeping. sent11: if something does not lather Myrtus then it is a kind of an implant and is amitotic. sent12: the fact that the ingenue is not unitary and lathers Alexander is not correct. sent13: the epicenter is a numbat if it is dishonest. sent14: if the fact that something lathers Alexander hold then it does not lather coulomb and it does lather Myrtus. sent15: the ingenue lathers Alexander if that it is non-unitary thing that does not lathers Alexander is wrong. sent16: the fact that the ingenue does lather Myrtus but it is not a sacking is wrong. sent17: if the camcorder does not lather coulomb the ingenue is both amitotic and unitary. sent18: if the camcorder is amitotic that the grivet is a numbat and it is dishonest does not hold. sent19: the resuscitator does denaturalize basidium and it is a surprising. sent20: that the ingenue is not unitary and does not lather Alexander is false. sent21: the epicenter is a sacking that does denaturalize scalp if the camcorder is not amitotic. sent22: if the epicenter is a kind of a sacking the microsporophyll does lather Myrtus. sent23: that the microsporophyll does not lather Myrtus and does not sack is not correct. sent24: if the microsporophyll does lather Myrtus then that the ingenue does not lather coulomb and does lather Myrtus is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the camcorder is not amitotic.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the epicenter is a sacking and denaturalizes scalp.; int1 -> int2: the epicenter is a kind of a sacking.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the microsporophyll lathers Myrtus.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the fact that the ingenue does not lather coulomb and does lather Myrtus is not true.; sent14 -> int5: the ingenue does not lather coulomb and does lather Myrtus if it does lather Alexander.; sent15 & sent20 -> int6: the ingenue lathers Alexander.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the ingenue does not lather coulomb and lathers Myrtus.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the camcorder is amitotic.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the fact that the grivet is a kind of a numbat that is honest is not right.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the epicenter is an implant.
sent11 -> int11: if the epicenter does not lather Myrtus it is both an implant and amitotic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is a numbat but not dishonest is not correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it does lather coulomb and does denaturalize scalp does not hold. sent2: the epicenter is a numbat and it sacks if the grivet does not lather Alexander. sent3: if the ingenue denaturalizes scalp it is not a sacking and it lathers Alexander. sent4: if the ingenue does denaturalize scalp it does lather Alexander. sent5: if the camcorder is amitotic then that the grivet is a numbat but it is not dishonest is not right. sent6: the fact that the ingenue is not dishonest and it does not lather Myrtus is not right. sent7: something lathers Myrtus if it lathers Alexander. sent8: if the camcorder is amitotic then the fact that the ingenue lathers coulomb and does denaturalize scalp is incorrect. sent9: the grivet is not dishonest but it is amitotic. sent10: if something hurtles dogging it is a kind of a keeping. sent11: if something does not lather Myrtus then it is a kind of an implant and is amitotic. sent12: the fact that the ingenue is not unitary and lathers Alexander is not correct. sent13: the epicenter is a numbat if it is dishonest. sent14: if the fact that something lathers Alexander hold then it does not lather coulomb and it does lather Myrtus. sent15: the ingenue lathers Alexander if that it is non-unitary thing that does not lathers Alexander is wrong. sent16: the fact that the ingenue does lather Myrtus but it is not a sacking is wrong. sent17: if the camcorder does not lather coulomb the ingenue is both amitotic and unitary. sent18: if the camcorder is amitotic that the grivet is a numbat and it is dishonest does not hold. sent19: the resuscitator does denaturalize basidium and it is a surprising. sent20: that the ingenue is not unitary and does not lather Alexander is false. sent21: the epicenter is a sacking that does denaturalize scalp if the camcorder is not amitotic. sent22: if the epicenter is a kind of a sacking the microsporophyll does lather Myrtus. sent23: that the microsporophyll does not lather Myrtus and does not sack is not correct. sent24: if the microsporophyll does lather Myrtus then that the ingenue does not lather coulomb and does lather Myrtus is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the camcorder is not amitotic.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the epicenter is a sacking and denaturalizes scalp.; int1 -> int2: the epicenter is a kind of a sacking.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the microsporophyll lathers Myrtus.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the fact that the ingenue does not lather coulomb and does lather Myrtus is not true.; sent14 -> int5: the ingenue does not lather coulomb and does lather Myrtus if it does lather Alexander.; sent15 & sent20 -> int6: the ingenue lathers Alexander.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the ingenue does not lather coulomb and lathers Myrtus.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the camcorder is amitotic.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the fact that the grivet is a kind of a numbat that is honest is not right.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__