the quenching parole does not occur.
sent1: the enacting usance occurs if the demising Macaca occurs. sent2: the takeaway happens. sent3: if the fact that that the prewarness happens and the quenching Elam happens is false is not incorrect then the prewarness does not occur. sent4: the prewarness and the demising suffocation happens. sent5: if the prewarness does not occur then that the stampeding expansion does not occur and the quenching Citation does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the stampeding expansion does not occur then the quenching parole does not occur. sent7: the spying happens if not the spending but the transaction occurs. sent8: if that the spying occurs is not wrong the entailing does not occur and the stampeding Xenosauridae does not occur. sent9: that the openness occurs is brought about by that the seeling occurs. sent10: if that the stampeding expansion does not occur and the quenching Citation does not occur is not true then that the stampeding expansion occurs is right. sent11: that not the spending but the transaction happens is brought about by that the open occurs. sent12: either the thunderclap occurs or the renunciation does not occur or both. sent13: the seeling occurs if the stampeding outfitted does not occur and the Lincolnesqueness does not occur. sent14: the Siniticness does not occur if the fact that the enacting usance does not occur and the demising Macaca does not occur does not hold. sent15: the stampeding expansion does not occur if the demising Macaca does not occur. sent16: that the stampeding outfitted does not occur and the Lincolnesqueness does not occur is caused by the unnoticeableness. sent17: that the prewarness and the quenching Elam occurs is not right if the entailing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demising Macaca occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the enacting usance happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the enacting usance and the takeaway occurs.; sent4 -> int3: the demising suffocation happens.;
the Sinitic does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the quenching parole does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the enacting usance occurs if the demising Macaca occurs. sent2: the takeaway happens. sent3: if the fact that that the prewarness happens and the quenching Elam happens is false is not incorrect then the prewarness does not occur. sent4: the prewarness and the demising suffocation happens. sent5: if the prewarness does not occur then that the stampeding expansion does not occur and the quenching Citation does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the stampeding expansion does not occur then the quenching parole does not occur. sent7: the spying happens if not the spending but the transaction occurs. sent8: if that the spying occurs is not wrong the entailing does not occur and the stampeding Xenosauridae does not occur. sent9: that the openness occurs is brought about by that the seeling occurs. sent10: if that the stampeding expansion does not occur and the quenching Citation does not occur is not true then that the stampeding expansion occurs is right. sent11: that not the spending but the transaction happens is brought about by that the open occurs. sent12: either the thunderclap occurs or the renunciation does not occur or both. sent13: the seeling occurs if the stampeding outfitted does not occur and the Lincolnesqueness does not occur. sent14: the Siniticness does not occur if the fact that the enacting usance does not occur and the demising Macaca does not occur does not hold. sent15: the stampeding expansion does not occur if the demising Macaca does not occur. sent16: that the stampeding outfitted does not occur and the Lincolnesqueness does not occur is caused by the unnoticeableness. sent17: that the prewarness and the quenching Elam occurs is not right if the entailing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demising Macaca occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the enacting usance happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the enacting usance and the takeaway occurs.; sent4 -> int3: the demising suffocation happens.; __UNKNOWN__