that the testaceousness occurs and the rinsing does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: the rinsing does not occur if the histocompatibility happens and the imponderableness occurs. sent2: the twit does not occur. sent3: the algometricness occurs. sent4: that the spill happens is right if either the venipuncture does not occur or the federalizing afghani does not occur or both. sent5: that the histocompatibility occurs is caused by that the venipuncture occurs. sent6: that the encircling rummage occurs and the digitalness does not occur prevents that the spilling happens. sent7: that the federalizing afghani occurs prevents the non-Indianness. sent8: the encircling rummage occurs. sent9: the abientness happens and the testaceousness occurs if the twit does not occur. sent10: the trabecularness and the imponderable occurs. sent11: the encircling rummage occurs and the digitalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the venipuncture does not occur is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: the venipuncture does not occur and/or the federalizing afghani does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the spill occurs.; sent6 & sent11 -> int3: the spill does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the venipuncture occurs is not incorrect.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the histocompatibility happens.; sent10 -> int7: the imponderable happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the histocompatibility and the imponderableness happens is true.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the rinse does not occur.; sent9 & sent2 -> int10: the abientness happens and the testaceousness occurs.; int10 -> int11: the testaceousness occurs.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
that the testaceousness happens but the rinsing does not occur is false.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the testaceousness occurs and the rinsing does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the rinsing does not occur if the histocompatibility happens and the imponderableness occurs. sent2: the twit does not occur. sent3: the algometricness occurs. sent4: that the spill happens is right if either the venipuncture does not occur or the federalizing afghani does not occur or both. sent5: that the histocompatibility occurs is caused by that the venipuncture occurs. sent6: that the encircling rummage occurs and the digitalness does not occur prevents that the spilling happens. sent7: that the federalizing afghani occurs prevents the non-Indianness. sent8: the encircling rummage occurs. sent9: the abientness happens and the testaceousness occurs if the twit does not occur. sent10: the trabecularness and the imponderable occurs. sent11: the encircling rummage occurs and the digitalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the venipuncture does not occur is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: the venipuncture does not occur and/or the federalizing afghani does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the spill occurs.; sent6 & sent11 -> int3: the spill does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the venipuncture occurs is not incorrect.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the histocompatibility happens.; sent10 -> int7: the imponderable happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the histocompatibility and the imponderableness happens is true.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the rinse does not occur.; sent9 & sent2 -> int10: the abientness happens and the testaceousness occurs.; int10 -> int11: the testaceousness occurs.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__