the pseudophloem is a skinned.
sent1: if there is something such that it is a Service and it coffins wheelwork the babka is photovoltaic. sent2: that something does rear saltpan and is not a skinned does not hold if it is not unmusical. sent3: the fact that if the immodesty is cross-sectional and does not cleave monition the pseudophloem cleave monition is true. sent4: the immodesty does rear saltpan and is not unmusical if the painting does not coffin kinkajou. sent5: everything does coffin wheelwork. sent6: the immodesty does cleave monition if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of ctenoid thing that communicates is wrong. sent7: there is something such that it is not photovoltaic. sent8: something that does rear saltpan and is not unmusical is not a kind of a wick. sent9: the clomiphene is a centner. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it rears saltpan hold. sent11: the painting is not unmusical and/or it coffins kinkajou. sent12: that something does skin is true if it cleaves monition. sent13: that the babka coffins kinkajou but it is melodious is incorrect if something is not photovoltaic. sent14: the painting does rear saltpan if there exists something such that the fact that it coffins kinkajou and it is not unmusical is incorrect. sent15: that the clomiphene is a kind of a Service is not false if it is a centner. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is ctenoid thing that does communicate is not correct. sent17: the pseudophloem is not a skinned if the painting is not cross-sectional but it does rear saltpan. sent18: the manikin is not a wick if there is something such that the fact that it is a wick that cleaves monition is not right. sent19: something is cross-sectional and does not cleave monition if it is not a wick. sent20: if something is not cross-sectional then the fact that it is a wick that cleaves monition is not right. sent21: if either the painting rears saltpan or it is unmusical or both then the babka is not a kind of a skinned. sent22: if the immodesty is a wick and/or does cleave monition then the painting is not cross-sectional.
sent16 & sent6 -> int1: the immodesty cleaves monition.; int1 -> int2: the immodesty is a wick or it cleaves monition or both.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the painting is not cross-sectional.; sent7 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the babka coffins kinkajou but it is not unmusical is false is right.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it coffins kinkajou and it is not unmusical is wrong.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the painting does rear saltpan.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the painting is not cross-sectional but it rears saltpan.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the manikin is not a wick.
sent20 -> int8: if the fact that the immodesty is not cross-sectional is correct then that it is a kind of a wick that does cleave monition is false.; sent2 -> int9: that the painting rears saltpan but it is not a skinned is false if it is not unmusical.;
$hypothesis$ = the pseudophloem is a skinned. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is a Service and it coffins wheelwork the babka is photovoltaic. sent2: that something does rear saltpan and is not a skinned does not hold if it is not unmusical. sent3: the fact that if the immodesty is cross-sectional and does not cleave monition the pseudophloem cleave monition is true. sent4: the immodesty does rear saltpan and is not unmusical if the painting does not coffin kinkajou. sent5: everything does coffin wheelwork. sent6: the immodesty does cleave monition if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of ctenoid thing that communicates is wrong. sent7: there is something such that it is not photovoltaic. sent8: something that does rear saltpan and is not unmusical is not a kind of a wick. sent9: the clomiphene is a centner. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it rears saltpan hold. sent11: the painting is not unmusical and/or it coffins kinkajou. sent12: that something does skin is true if it cleaves monition. sent13: that the babka coffins kinkajou but it is melodious is incorrect if something is not photovoltaic. sent14: the painting does rear saltpan if there exists something such that the fact that it coffins kinkajou and it is not unmusical is incorrect. sent15: that the clomiphene is a kind of a Service is not false if it is a centner. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is ctenoid thing that does communicate is not correct. sent17: the pseudophloem is not a skinned if the painting is not cross-sectional but it does rear saltpan. sent18: the manikin is not a wick if there is something such that the fact that it is a wick that cleaves monition is not right. sent19: something is cross-sectional and does not cleave monition if it is not a wick. sent20: if something is not cross-sectional then the fact that it is a wick that cleaves monition is not right. sent21: if either the painting rears saltpan or it is unmusical or both then the babka is not a kind of a skinned. sent22: if the immodesty is a wick and/or does cleave monition then the painting is not cross-sectional. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent6 -> int1: the immodesty cleaves monition.; int1 -> int2: the immodesty is a wick or it cleaves monition or both.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the painting is not cross-sectional.; sent7 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the babka coffins kinkajou but it is not unmusical is false is right.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it coffins kinkajou and it is not unmusical is wrong.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the painting does rear saltpan.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the painting is not cross-sectional but it rears saltpan.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__