the smacking happens.
sent1: that not the effacing fundamentalism but the cloning occurs is triggered by the roofing chest. sent2: the smack happens if the fact that the tinning mausoleum does not occur is correct. sent3: if the sit-in does not occur or the roofing wingman does not occur or both the fact that the tinning mausoleum does not occur is not wrong. sent4: if the go-slow happens then the fact that the smack does not occur and the tinning mausoleum happens is incorrect. sent5: the roofing chest occurs if the effacing red occurs. sent6: the sit-in does not occur if that not the smacking but the tinning mausoleum happens is not true. sent7: if the fact that the upness does not occur and the go-slow does not occur is incorrect then the go-slow occurs. sent8: if both the roofing planography and the synovialness happens the roofing wingman does not occur. sent9: the sit-in does not occur and/or the roofing wingman happens. sent10: that that the upness does not occur and the go-slow does not occur is wrong is not incorrect if that the metrologicalness does not occur is true. sent11: the synovialness occurs. sent12: the sit-in happens and/or the roofing wingman does not occur. sent13: the hoist does not occur and/or the female does not occur. sent14: that the jactitation does not occur triggers that the faith happens and the effacing red happens. sent15: that the roofing wingman but not the synovialness happens is false if that the sit-in does not occur is correct. sent16: if the effacing fundamentalism does not occur then the optimizing does not occur and the octalness does not occur. sent17: the metrologicalness does not occur if the optimizing does not occur and the octalness does not occur. sent18: the roofing planography happens. sent19: the benedictoriness happens and the roofing causalgia happens if the roofing planography does not occur.
sent18 & sent11 -> int1: the roofing planography happens and the synovialness occurs.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the roofing wingman does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the sit-in does not occur or the roofing wingman does not occur or both.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the tinning mausoleum does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
both the benedictoriness and the roofing causalgia occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the smacking happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the effacing fundamentalism but the cloning occurs is triggered by the roofing chest. sent2: the smack happens if the fact that the tinning mausoleum does not occur is correct. sent3: if the sit-in does not occur or the roofing wingman does not occur or both the fact that the tinning mausoleum does not occur is not wrong. sent4: if the go-slow happens then the fact that the smack does not occur and the tinning mausoleum happens is incorrect. sent5: the roofing chest occurs if the effacing red occurs. sent6: the sit-in does not occur if that not the smacking but the tinning mausoleum happens is not true. sent7: if the fact that the upness does not occur and the go-slow does not occur is incorrect then the go-slow occurs. sent8: if both the roofing planography and the synovialness happens the roofing wingman does not occur. sent9: the sit-in does not occur and/or the roofing wingman happens. sent10: that that the upness does not occur and the go-slow does not occur is wrong is not incorrect if that the metrologicalness does not occur is true. sent11: the synovialness occurs. sent12: the sit-in happens and/or the roofing wingman does not occur. sent13: the hoist does not occur and/or the female does not occur. sent14: that the jactitation does not occur triggers that the faith happens and the effacing red happens. sent15: that the roofing wingman but not the synovialness happens is false if that the sit-in does not occur is correct. sent16: if the effacing fundamentalism does not occur then the optimizing does not occur and the octalness does not occur. sent17: the metrologicalness does not occur if the optimizing does not occur and the octalness does not occur. sent18: the roofing planography happens. sent19: the benedictoriness happens and the roofing causalgia happens if the roofing planography does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent11 -> int1: the roofing planography happens and the synovialness occurs.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the roofing wingman does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the sit-in does not occur or the roofing wingman does not occur or both.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the tinning mausoleum does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__