the mitochondrion is an anhydride.
sent1: the fact that the prattler is an amphibole and is a pipal is not right. sent2: that the prattler is a kind of an amphibole that is not a kind of a pipal is false if the fact that it is voluble is correct. sent3: the prattler does lift if it is a pipal. sent4: if that the mitochondrion does muzzle is not incorrect it is a Triassic. sent5: if that the autoradiography is not a lift but it is a kind of a pipal is not false then the auger is a kind of a lift. sent6: if the mitochondrion is a kind of Triassic an anhydride then the prattler does not lift. sent7: the mitochondrion is a muzzle. sent8: the prattler is voluble. sent9: if the fact that the prattler is an amphibole and not a pipal does not hold then it lifts.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the mitochondrion is Triassic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mitochondrion is a kind of an anhydride.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the mitochondrion is a kind of Triassic thing that is a kind of an anhydride.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the prattler does not lift.; sent2 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the prattler is a kind of an amphibole but it is not a pipal is not right.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the prattler does lift.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the mitochondrion is a kind of an anhydride.
$hypothesis$ = the mitochondrion is an anhydride. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the prattler is an amphibole and is a pipal is not right. sent2: that the prattler is a kind of an amphibole that is not a kind of a pipal is false if the fact that it is voluble is correct. sent3: the prattler does lift if it is a pipal. sent4: if that the mitochondrion does muzzle is not incorrect it is a Triassic. sent5: if that the autoradiography is not a lift but it is a kind of a pipal is not false then the auger is a kind of a lift. sent6: if the mitochondrion is a kind of Triassic an anhydride then the prattler does not lift. sent7: the mitochondrion is a muzzle. sent8: the prattler is voluble. sent9: if the fact that the prattler is an amphibole and not a pipal does not hold then it lifts. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the mitochondrion is Triassic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mitochondrion is a kind of an anhydride.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the mitochondrion is a kind of Triassic thing that is a kind of an anhydride.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the prattler does not lift.; sent2 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the prattler is a kind of an amphibole but it is not a pipal is not right.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the prattler does lift.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__