the ripcord coifs and is a Caxton.
sent1: if the fact that the path does not articulate flagon and is endothermic does not hold then that it is ciliary is correct. sent2: if the particulate is not a kind of a coif then the ripcord does coif and it is a Caxton. sent3: the particulate does not coif if the crane toilet-trains valley. sent4: the fact that the path does not articulate flagon and is endothermic is false if something is a Bundesbank. sent5: if something is not a Bundesbank then the fact that it is a coif that is a Caxton is not true. sent6: if the path is ciliary then the crane does toilet-train valley.
that the ripcord coifs and is a Caxton is not correct.
sent5 -> int1: if the ripcord is not a Bundesbank that it is a coif and a Caxton is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the ripcord coifs and is a Caxton. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the path does not articulate flagon and is endothermic does not hold then that it is ciliary is correct. sent2: if the particulate is not a kind of a coif then the ripcord does coif and it is a Caxton. sent3: the particulate does not coif if the crane toilet-trains valley. sent4: the fact that the path does not articulate flagon and is endothermic is false if something is a Bundesbank. sent5: if something is not a Bundesbank then the fact that it is a coif that is a Caxton is not true. sent6: if the path is ciliary then the crane does toilet-train valley. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__