that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Marquand it does not reopen Sialidae and it does price is not true.
sent1: if the fact that the tipster is an identification is not wrong then it is not a price and it is a Koch. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Gallicism then it is both not a cosmetician and a basidiocarp. sent3: if the tipster is a Marquand then it reopens Sialidae and it is a price. sent4: if the fact that the roofer reopens Sialidae is correct then it is not spiritualistic and not non-glycogenic. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Marquand then it does price. sent6: there is something such that if it is aptitudinal it is not an identification and it does slog. sent7: if the eminence is ophthalmic then it does not concern nephrotoxin and does concern thunderstorm. sent8: the tipster does not reopen Sialidae but it is a price if it is a Marquand. sent9: there is something such that if it is humic then it does not approve and it is a kind of a loophole. sent10: the fact that there exists something such that if that it is a Marquand is not wrong it does reopen Sialidae and it is a price is not wrong. sent11: the tipster does not reopen Sialidae but it is predictable if it is destructible. sent12: something is not attributive but it is parochial if it is a sorbet. sent13: there is something such that if it is a Marquand then it does not reopen Sialidae. sent14: that the tipster is a price is not false if it is a Marquand. sent15: there is something such that if it is recessive then it does not reopen roofer and it is a Mormon. sent16: the hydration does not sermonize but it is a lychgate if it is a kind of a price.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the tipster is not attributive but it is parochial if it is a kind of a sorbet.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Marquand it does not reopen Sialidae and it does price is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the tipster is an identification is not wrong then it is not a price and it is a Koch. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Gallicism then it is both not a cosmetician and a basidiocarp. sent3: if the tipster is a Marquand then it reopens Sialidae and it is a price. sent4: if the fact that the roofer reopens Sialidae is correct then it is not spiritualistic and not non-glycogenic. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Marquand then it does price. sent6: there is something such that if it is aptitudinal it is not an identification and it does slog. sent7: if the eminence is ophthalmic then it does not concern nephrotoxin and does concern thunderstorm. sent8: the tipster does not reopen Sialidae but it is a price if it is a Marquand. sent9: there is something such that if it is humic then it does not approve and it is a kind of a loophole. sent10: the fact that there exists something such that if that it is a Marquand is not wrong it does reopen Sialidae and it is a price is not wrong. sent11: the tipster does not reopen Sialidae but it is predictable if it is destructible. sent12: something is not attributive but it is parochial if it is a sorbet. sent13: there is something such that if it is a Marquand then it does not reopen Sialidae. sent14: that the tipster is a price is not false if it is a Marquand. sent15: there is something such that if it is recessive then it does not reopen roofer and it is a Mormon. sent16: the hydration does not sermonize but it is a lychgate if it is a kind of a price. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__