the beeline is a kind of a flop.
sent1: if that the catechin is a flop hold then the basidium is a centralism. sent2: if something is a kind of a flop then the fact that it is not a centralism and it is not non-alkaline is not right. sent3: there is something such that that it is both a Mormons and undemonstrative does not hold. sent4: if the designer is not undemonstrative it is Mormons and it is a flop. sent5: the beeline is not a kind of a flop if the basidium is alkaline and not a akee. sent6: if the basidium does apologize then the beeline is a akee. sent7: the see is not non-alkaline if there exists something such that that it is not Mormons and it is undemonstrative does not hold. sent8: the see is peripatetic but it is not a Megaera if the beeline is alkaline. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does not level nudger and is not a swine is false. sent10: that something apologizes and is not a kind of a akee does not hold if it does not moderate. sent11: something is a centralism if it does not apologize. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is not Mormons and it is undemonstrative does not hold. sent13: if the see is a kind of a centralism then the beeline flops. sent14: if that something is not a hug but it is a kind of a magician is not right it is not a akee. sent15: the see does not moderate. sent16: the beeline does not apologize. sent17: if something is alkaline then that it is not a hug and it is a magician is wrong. sent18: the fact that something hugs and is a kind of a magician does not hold if it is alkaline. sent19: if something does flop then the catechin flop and/or it moderates. sent20: the basidium is a centralism if the catechin does moderate. sent21: if the see hugs then it is not a akee.
sent17 -> int1: if the see is alkaline that it is not a kind of a hug and it is a magician is not correct.; sent12 & sent7 -> int2: the see is alkaline.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the see does not hug but it is a magician is wrong.; sent14 -> int4: if that the see is not a hug but a magician is false then that it is not a kind of a akee is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the see is not a akee.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the see does apologize.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the see does apologize and is not a akee.; sent10 -> int7: if the fact that the see is not moderating hold that it does apologize and is not a kind of a akee is not true.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: that the see does apologize but it is not a kind of a akee is wrong.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the see does not apologize is right.; sent11 -> int11: if the see does not apologize then it is a centralism.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the see is a centralism is true.; int12 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the beeline does not flop.
$hypothesis$ = the beeline is a kind of a flop. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the catechin is a flop hold then the basidium is a centralism. sent2: if something is a kind of a flop then the fact that it is not a centralism and it is not non-alkaline is not right. sent3: there is something such that that it is both a Mormons and undemonstrative does not hold. sent4: if the designer is not undemonstrative it is Mormons and it is a flop. sent5: the beeline is not a kind of a flop if the basidium is alkaline and not a akee. sent6: if the basidium does apologize then the beeline is a akee. sent7: the see is not non-alkaline if there exists something such that that it is not Mormons and it is undemonstrative does not hold. sent8: the see is peripatetic but it is not a Megaera if the beeline is alkaline. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does not level nudger and is not a swine is false. sent10: that something apologizes and is not a kind of a akee does not hold if it does not moderate. sent11: something is a centralism if it does not apologize. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is not Mormons and it is undemonstrative does not hold. sent13: if the see is a kind of a centralism then the beeline flops. sent14: if that something is not a hug but it is a kind of a magician is not right it is not a akee. sent15: the see does not moderate. sent16: the beeline does not apologize. sent17: if something is alkaline then that it is not a hug and it is a magician is wrong. sent18: the fact that something hugs and is a kind of a magician does not hold if it is alkaline. sent19: if something does flop then the catechin flop and/or it moderates. sent20: the basidium is a centralism if the catechin does moderate. sent21: if the see hugs then it is not a akee. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: if the see is alkaline that it is not a kind of a hug and it is a magician is not correct.; sent12 & sent7 -> int2: the see is alkaline.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the see does not hug but it is a magician is wrong.; sent14 -> int4: if that the see is not a hug but a magician is false then that it is not a kind of a akee is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the see is not a akee.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the see does apologize.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the see does apologize and is not a akee.; sent10 -> int7: if the fact that the see is not moderating hold that it does apologize and is not a kind of a akee is not true.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: that the see does apologize but it is not a kind of a akee is wrong.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the see does not apologize is right.; sent11 -> int11: if the see does not apologize then it is a centralism.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the see is a centralism is true.; int12 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__