that there is something such that if the fact that it is not hypnotic and not a bolivar is incorrect it is not a brushed is wrong.
sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not metabolic and it is not a Kosovo is not correct it credits Irula is right. sent2: the Aztec does not brush if it is hypnotic. sent3: if that the Aztec is not hypnotic and it is not a bolivar is not right it is not a brushed. sent4: if the Aztec is not hypnotic and is not a kind of a bolivar then it is not a brushed. sent5: if the fact that the Aztec is a kind of non-hypnotic thing that is not a bolivar is false it does brush. sent6: something is non-faucal if the fact that it is not a fluorouracil and is not a heartbeat is incorrect. sent7: if the Aztec is a prescription then it is not hypnotic.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a fluorouracil and it is not a kind of a heartbeat is not correct then it is not faucal.
sent6 -> int1: the escapist is not faucal if that it is not a fluorouracil and it is not a kind of a heartbeat is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it is not hypnotic and not a bolivar is incorrect it is not a brushed is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not metabolic and it is not a Kosovo is not correct it credits Irula is right. sent2: the Aztec does not brush if it is hypnotic. sent3: if that the Aztec is not hypnotic and it is not a bolivar is not right it is not a brushed. sent4: if the Aztec is not hypnotic and is not a kind of a bolivar then it is not a brushed. sent5: if the fact that the Aztec is a kind of non-hypnotic thing that is not a bolivar is false it does brush. sent6: something is non-faucal if the fact that it is not a fluorouracil and is not a heartbeat is incorrect. sent7: if the Aztec is a prescription then it is not hypnotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__