that the agrobiologicness occurs but the booking effortfulness does not occur is false.
sent1: that the bleach does not occur yields that the adscriptness occurs and the slogging hydrometer does not occur. sent2: that the responsibility does not occur and the katharobicness does not occur is wrong. sent3: that the agrobiologicness occurs and the booking effortfulness does not occur is incorrect if that the stipendiariness happens hold. sent4: that the slogging lignum does not occur and the recognizing happens does not hold if the booking flour does not occur. sent5: the non-stipendiariness is prevented by that the slogging fowler does not occur and the disarming does not occur. sent6: if the bleach happens then the agrobiologicness occurs and the booking effortfulness does not occur. sent7: if that both the non-analphabeticness and the non-atheisticness occurs is not right the fact that the crayon does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: the fact that both the non-analphabeticness and the non-atheisticness happens is false. sent9: the hollowing occurs. sent10: the slogging fowler does not occur if the equalization does not occur and the procrastination does not occur. sent11: if either the bleach occurs or the equalization occurs or both the booking flour does not occur. sent12: the fact that the precociousness happens hold if that the responsibility does not occur and the katharobicness does not occur is false. sent13: that if the crayoning does not occur the hollow but not the procrastination occurs is true. sent14: the disarming does not occur. sent15: the fact that the fact that both the slogging lignum and the recognizing happens does not hold is correct if the booking flour does not occur. sent16: the doctor happens. sent17: if the slogging USN does not occur then that not the fohn but the mandibulofacialness happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the equalization occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the bleaching and/or the equalization happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the booking flour does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the slogging lignum does not occur but the recognizing happens does not hold.; sent12 & sent2 -> int4: that the precociousness occurs is not incorrect.; sent7 & sent8 -> int5: the crayoning does not occur.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the hollowness but not the procrastination happens.; int6 -> int7: that the procrastination does not occur is not false.;
the agrobiologicness happens but the booking effortfulness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the agrobiologicness occurs but the booking effortfulness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bleach does not occur yields that the adscriptness occurs and the slogging hydrometer does not occur. sent2: that the responsibility does not occur and the katharobicness does not occur is wrong. sent3: that the agrobiologicness occurs and the booking effortfulness does not occur is incorrect if that the stipendiariness happens hold. sent4: that the slogging lignum does not occur and the recognizing happens does not hold if the booking flour does not occur. sent5: the non-stipendiariness is prevented by that the slogging fowler does not occur and the disarming does not occur. sent6: if the bleach happens then the agrobiologicness occurs and the booking effortfulness does not occur. sent7: if that both the non-analphabeticness and the non-atheisticness occurs is not right the fact that the crayon does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: the fact that both the non-analphabeticness and the non-atheisticness happens is false. sent9: the hollowing occurs. sent10: the slogging fowler does not occur if the equalization does not occur and the procrastination does not occur. sent11: if either the bleach occurs or the equalization occurs or both the booking flour does not occur. sent12: the fact that the precociousness happens hold if that the responsibility does not occur and the katharobicness does not occur is false. sent13: that if the crayoning does not occur the hollow but not the procrastination occurs is true. sent14: the disarming does not occur. sent15: the fact that the fact that both the slogging lignum and the recognizing happens does not hold is correct if the booking flour does not occur. sent16: the doctor happens. sent17: if the slogging USN does not occur then that not the fohn but the mandibulofacialness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the equalization occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the bleaching and/or the equalization happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the booking flour does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the slogging lignum does not occur but the recognizing happens does not hold.; sent12 & sent2 -> int4: that the precociousness occurs is not incorrect.; sent7 & sent8 -> int5: the crayoning does not occur.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the hollowness but not the procrastination happens.; int6 -> int7: that the procrastination does not occur is not false.; __UNKNOWN__