the thunderstorm does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the satyricness occurs is not wrong. sent2: the dramaticness happens. sent3: the revoking does not occur if that the non-contemptibleness and the gastronomy occurs is true. sent4: the welding demagnetization happens and the crystallizing academy happens if the leaner does not occur. sent5: the fact that the leaner does not occur is right if the satyricness does not occur and the revoke does not occur. sent6: that the trusteeship does not occur is prevented by that the revoking happens. sent7: the fact that both the thunderstorm and the goal happens is not wrong if that the probate does not occur is correct. sent8: the fact that the probate occurs hold. sent9: both the occupancy and the change-up occurs. sent10: both the welding demagnetization and the leaner occurs if the autarchicness does not occur. sent11: the leaner happens. sent12: that the trusteeship does not occur is not wrong if the relining laudator does not occur. sent13: that both the welding demagnetization and the crystallizing academy happens prevents the numerating. sent14: if the goal does not occur and/or the numerateness occurs then the crystallizing academy occurs. sent15: the autarchicness does not occur if the gastronomy occurs. sent16: if the autarchicness does not occur the leaner occurs. sent17: the campylotropousness happens. sent18: if the goal occurs and the probating happens the relining laudator does not occur. sent19: the gastronomy occurs. sent20: if the copularness does not occur not the contemptibleness but the gastronomy occurs. sent21: the crystallizing academy happens if the numerateness occurs. sent22: the thunderstorm does not occur if the crystallizing academy happens and the welding demagnetization happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the goal happens.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the goal happens and the probating occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the relining laudator does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the trusteeship does not occur is not wrong.; sent15 & sent19 -> int4: the autarchicness does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the welding demagnetization occurs and the leaner happens.; int5 -> int6: the welding demagnetization occurs.;
the thunderstorm occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the thunderstorm does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the satyricness occurs is not wrong. sent2: the dramaticness happens. sent3: the revoking does not occur if that the non-contemptibleness and the gastronomy occurs is true. sent4: the welding demagnetization happens and the crystallizing academy happens if the leaner does not occur. sent5: the fact that the leaner does not occur is right if the satyricness does not occur and the revoke does not occur. sent6: that the trusteeship does not occur is prevented by that the revoking happens. sent7: the fact that both the thunderstorm and the goal happens is not wrong if that the probate does not occur is correct. sent8: the fact that the probate occurs hold. sent9: both the occupancy and the change-up occurs. sent10: both the welding demagnetization and the leaner occurs if the autarchicness does not occur. sent11: the leaner happens. sent12: that the trusteeship does not occur is not wrong if the relining laudator does not occur. sent13: that both the welding demagnetization and the crystallizing academy happens prevents the numerating. sent14: if the goal does not occur and/or the numerateness occurs then the crystallizing academy occurs. sent15: the autarchicness does not occur if the gastronomy occurs. sent16: if the autarchicness does not occur the leaner occurs. sent17: the campylotropousness happens. sent18: if the goal occurs and the probating happens the relining laudator does not occur. sent19: the gastronomy occurs. sent20: if the copularness does not occur not the contemptibleness but the gastronomy occurs. sent21: the crystallizing academy happens if the numerateness occurs. sent22: the thunderstorm does not occur if the crystallizing academy happens and the welding demagnetization happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the goal happens.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the goal happens and the probating occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the relining laudator does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the trusteeship does not occur is not wrong.; sent15 & sent19 -> int4: the autarchicness does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the welding demagnetization occurs and the leaner happens.; int5 -> int6: the welding demagnetization occurs.; __UNKNOWN__