the fact that the telecaster utilizes is right.
sent1: if something that does not tusk midgrass does Simonize courtier then it is unshapely. sent2: the telecaster does not depreciate. sent3: The matting does Simonize courtier. sent4: the courtier is not Riemannian. sent5: something does not Simonize matting and does not utilize if it is unshapely. sent6: if the telecaster does not utilize the courtier does not Simonize matting. sent7: if the courtier does not utilize then the telecaster does not Simonize matting. sent8: the telecaster does not utilize if the courtier does not Simonize matting and does not utilize. sent9: the courtier is a hoe. sent10: the courtier does not Simonize Rousseau. sent11: the courtier is unshapely if the tourniquet is unshapely. sent12: the courtier does Simonize matting. sent13: something does not tusk midgrass but it does Simonize courtier if it does not cure. sent14: the fact that the telecaster is not earlier is not correct. sent15: the telecaster does Simonize matting. sent16: the courtier utilizes. sent17: that the rod does not Simonize matting is true. sent18: the courtier is not an infanticide.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the telecaster does not utilize.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the courtier does not Simonize matting is not wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the telecaster does not utilize.
sent5 -> int3: the courtier does not Simonize matting and does not utilize if it is not shapely.; sent1 -> int4: if the tourniquet does not tusk midgrass but it Simonizes courtier the fact that it is unshapely hold.; sent13 -> int5: if the tourniquet does not cure then it does not tusk midgrass and does Simonize courtier.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the telecaster utilizes is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does not tusk midgrass does Simonize courtier then it is unshapely. sent2: the telecaster does not depreciate. sent3: The matting does Simonize courtier. sent4: the courtier is not Riemannian. sent5: something does not Simonize matting and does not utilize if it is unshapely. sent6: if the telecaster does not utilize the courtier does not Simonize matting. sent7: if the courtier does not utilize then the telecaster does not Simonize matting. sent8: the telecaster does not utilize if the courtier does not Simonize matting and does not utilize. sent9: the courtier is a hoe. sent10: the courtier does not Simonize Rousseau. sent11: the courtier is unshapely if the tourniquet is unshapely. sent12: the courtier does Simonize matting. sent13: something does not tusk midgrass but it does Simonize courtier if it does not cure. sent14: the fact that the telecaster is not earlier is not correct. sent15: the telecaster does Simonize matting. sent16: the courtier utilizes. sent17: that the rod does not Simonize matting is true. sent18: the courtier is not an infanticide. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the telecaster does not utilize.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the courtier does not Simonize matting is not wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__