if the fieldmouse is intemperate then the olecranon does not derive.
sent1: the fieldmouse is a Terebellidae. sent2: the endorser is estimable and does create. sent3: if something is not a bovine it does derive and is intemperate. sent4: that the fieldmouse is not intemperate and does derive is not correct. sent5: if the endorser is a Terebellidae then the fact that the fieldmouse is temperate but it is a Delacroix does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the endorser is intemperate is right then the fieldmouse is not a Delacroix. sent7: that the olecranon is not intemperate but it derives is not true. sent8: if the endorser is intemperate that the fact that the olecranon does not derive but it is a kind of a Delacroix is true is false. sent9: if that the fieldmouse is intemperate is true then the fact that that the endorser is not a Delacroix and it is not a kind of a Terebellidae is not false is not correct. sent10: if the fieldmouse derives the fact that the olecranon is not intemperate and it is not a Delacroix is incorrect. sent11: the fact that if the fieldmouse derives then the olecranon is not intemperate is true. sent12: if the fieldmouse derives then the olecranon is intemperate. sent13: the permit is not a kind of a bovine if the fact that the fieldmouse is unpublishable and/or non-basilar does not hold. sent14: if the endorser is estimable and it creates then it is not Corsican. sent15: that the endorser is not intemperate and not a Terebellidae does not hold if the fieldmouse is a Delacroix. sent16: if the endorser is a Delacroix that the olecranon is a kind of temperate thing that does not derive does not hold. sent17: something is a caddie and taxable if the fact that it is not Corsican is correct. sent18: that the olecranon is not a Terebellidae is not wrong if the endorser does derive. sent19: that the endorser is not a Terebellidae and derives is not right. sent20: the olecranon does not derive if the endorser is a Delacroix. sent21: if the fieldmouse is a kind of a Delacroix the endorser is not intemperate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fieldmouse is intemperate.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the endorser is not a kind of a Delacroix and it is not a Terebellidae does not hold.;
the permit derives.
sent3 -> int2: if the permit is not bovine then it does derive and is intemperate.; sent17 -> int3: if the endorser is non-Corsican then it is both a caddie and taxable.; sent14 & sent2 -> int4: the endorser is not Corsican.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the endorser does caddie and is taxable.; int5 -> int6: the endorser caddies.; int6 -> int7: something is a kind of a caddie.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fieldmouse is intemperate then the olecranon does not derive. ; $context$ = sent1: the fieldmouse is a Terebellidae. sent2: the endorser is estimable and does create. sent3: if something is not a bovine it does derive and is intemperate. sent4: that the fieldmouse is not intemperate and does derive is not correct. sent5: if the endorser is a Terebellidae then the fact that the fieldmouse is temperate but it is a Delacroix does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the endorser is intemperate is right then the fieldmouse is not a Delacroix. sent7: that the olecranon is not intemperate but it derives is not true. sent8: if the endorser is intemperate that the fact that the olecranon does not derive but it is a kind of a Delacroix is true is false. sent9: if that the fieldmouse is intemperate is true then the fact that that the endorser is not a Delacroix and it is not a kind of a Terebellidae is not false is not correct. sent10: if the fieldmouse derives the fact that the olecranon is not intemperate and it is not a Delacroix is incorrect. sent11: the fact that if the fieldmouse derives then the olecranon is not intemperate is true. sent12: if the fieldmouse derives then the olecranon is intemperate. sent13: the permit is not a kind of a bovine if the fact that the fieldmouse is unpublishable and/or non-basilar does not hold. sent14: if the endorser is estimable and it creates then it is not Corsican. sent15: that the endorser is not intemperate and not a Terebellidae does not hold if the fieldmouse is a Delacroix. sent16: if the endorser is a Delacroix that the olecranon is a kind of temperate thing that does not derive does not hold. sent17: something is a caddie and taxable if the fact that it is not Corsican is correct. sent18: that the olecranon is not a Terebellidae is not wrong if the endorser does derive. sent19: that the endorser is not a Terebellidae and derives is not right. sent20: the olecranon does not derive if the endorser is a Delacroix. sent21: if the fieldmouse is a kind of a Delacroix the endorser is not intemperate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fieldmouse is intemperate.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the endorser is not a kind of a Delacroix and it is not a Terebellidae does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__