the hushpuppy is avocational.
sent1: that the hushpuppy does not fledge and is not a kind of a Spark is not correct. sent2: the hushpuppy is not avocational or is a Mombasa or both if the grill is not Bayesian. sent3: the hushpuppy does recast intercourse and is causative. sent4: that the molester is a Mombasa is not false. sent5: if a Mombasa is Bayesian then it does not recast intercourse. sent6: something that is a destructibility is avocational. sent7: if that the hushpuppy does not fledge and is not a kind of a Spark is incorrect then it is a Mombasa. sent8: the minicar does not recast intercourse. sent9: the fact that the hushpuppy is a kind of the Mombasa if the hushpuppy is a Spark is not wrong. sent10: if something defuses influence it is a kind of a destructibility.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the hushpuppy is a kind of a Mombasa.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hushpuppy is Bayesian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hushpuppy is a Mombasa and it is Bayesian.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that if the hushpuppy is a kind of the Mombasa that is Bayesian the hushpuppy does not recast intercourse hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hushpuppy does not recast intercourse.; sent3 -> int5: the hushpuppy recasts intercourse.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the hushpuppy is not Bayesian.; sent10 -> int8: the hushpuppy is a kind of a destructibility if it does defuse influence.; sent6 -> int9: the hushpuppy is avocational if it is a destructibility.;
the hushpuppy is not avocational.
$hypothesis$ = the hushpuppy is avocational. ; $context$ = sent1: that the hushpuppy does not fledge and is not a kind of a Spark is not correct. sent2: the hushpuppy is not avocational or is a Mombasa or both if the grill is not Bayesian. sent3: the hushpuppy does recast intercourse and is causative. sent4: that the molester is a Mombasa is not false. sent5: if a Mombasa is Bayesian then it does not recast intercourse. sent6: something that is a destructibility is avocational. sent7: if that the hushpuppy does not fledge and is not a kind of a Spark is incorrect then it is a Mombasa. sent8: the minicar does not recast intercourse. sent9: the fact that the hushpuppy is a kind of the Mombasa if the hushpuppy is a Spark is not wrong. sent10: if something defuses influence it is a kind of a destructibility. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the hushpuppy is a kind of a Mombasa.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hushpuppy is Bayesian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hushpuppy is a Mombasa and it is Bayesian.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that if the hushpuppy is a kind of the Mombasa that is Bayesian the hushpuppy does not recast intercourse hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hushpuppy does not recast intercourse.; sent3 -> int5: the hushpuppy recasts intercourse.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the hushpuppy is not Bayesian.; sent10 -> int8: the hushpuppy is a kind of a destructibility if it does defuse influence.; sent6 -> int9: the hushpuppy is avocational if it is a destructibility.; __UNKNOWN__