the cheekpiece does not stuff porcelain.
sent1: if that there is something such that it does not recombine hold then the Vandal is a cytochrome. sent2: if the crutch is arteriosclerotic thing that is a fielding it narrows workstation. sent3: if the scaffolding does not stuff porcelain that it is a kind of a titivation that is not a cytochrome is not correct. sent4: that the crutch is not mithraic but it cudgels is not true if the Vandal fructifies. sent5: if something is not a titivation and does not recombine it is not a cytochrome. sent6: if the scaffolding is not a kind of a titivation then the cheekpiece stuffs porcelain. sent7: the fact that the center is not helpful and recombines is not right. sent8: the scaffolding is not a kind of a titivation if there exists something such that it does not fructify. sent9: if that something does narrow workstation but it does not fructify does not hold it does not stuff porcelain. sent10: there is something such that it does fructify. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it jiggles U and it is a viscometry is incorrect. sent12: the crutch is not arteriosclerotic and does field. sent13: if that something is a titivation that is not a cytochrome is not correct it is a cytochrome. sent14: if the crutch is not arteriosclerotic but it does field it narrows workstation. sent15: if there is something such that that it is unhelpful thing that recombines is false then the Vandal is a cytochrome. sent16: if the crutch does narrow workstation and it does fructify then the Vandal is not a cytochrome.
sent14 & sent12 -> int1: the crutch narrows workstation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crutch fructifies.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the crutch does narrow workstation and it does fructify.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the Vandal is not a cytochrome.; sent7 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not helpful and recombines is wrong.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the Vandal is a cytochrome.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the crutch does not fructify.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not fructify is right.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the scaffolding is not a titivation.; int9 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it is non-mithraic thing that is a kind of a cudgel does not hold.
sent13 -> int10: if that the scaffolding is a titivation but it is not a kind of a cytochrome is not right it is a cytochrome.;
$hypothesis$ = the cheekpiece does not stuff porcelain. ; $context$ = sent1: if that there is something such that it does not recombine hold then the Vandal is a cytochrome. sent2: if the crutch is arteriosclerotic thing that is a fielding it narrows workstation. sent3: if the scaffolding does not stuff porcelain that it is a kind of a titivation that is not a cytochrome is not correct. sent4: that the crutch is not mithraic but it cudgels is not true if the Vandal fructifies. sent5: if something is not a titivation and does not recombine it is not a cytochrome. sent6: if the scaffolding is not a kind of a titivation then the cheekpiece stuffs porcelain. sent7: the fact that the center is not helpful and recombines is not right. sent8: the scaffolding is not a kind of a titivation if there exists something such that it does not fructify. sent9: if that something does narrow workstation but it does not fructify does not hold it does not stuff porcelain. sent10: there is something such that it does fructify. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it jiggles U and it is a viscometry is incorrect. sent12: the crutch is not arteriosclerotic and does field. sent13: if that something is a titivation that is not a cytochrome is not correct it is a cytochrome. sent14: if the crutch is not arteriosclerotic but it does field it narrows workstation. sent15: if there is something such that that it is unhelpful thing that recombines is false then the Vandal is a cytochrome. sent16: if the crutch does narrow workstation and it does fructify then the Vandal is not a cytochrome. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent12 -> int1: the crutch narrows workstation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crutch fructifies.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the crutch does narrow workstation and it does fructify.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the Vandal is not a cytochrome.; sent7 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not helpful and recombines is wrong.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the Vandal is a cytochrome.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the crutch does not fructify.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not fructify is right.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the scaffolding is not a titivation.; int9 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__