the snatch is not sociolinguistic or non-Hollywood or both.
sent1: if the slopshop uncoils calk it is paranasal. sent2: the snatch is not a Hittite. sent3: if something is gluttonous then the slopshop is not Hollywood. sent4: something is not sociolinguistic and/or it is not a Hollywood if it does uncoil Cronus. sent5: if the fact that the slopshop is a foolscap and it is sternal is right then that the snatch is not a foolscap is not incorrect. sent6: the snatch is both not a buttermilk and a foolscap if the slopshop is paranasal. sent7: if the bookseller is a buttermilk the promoter is a kind of a buttermilk. sent8: the slopshop is a kind of a foolscap that is sternal if it is non-paranasal. sent9: the promoter is a buttermilk if the bookseller is sternal. sent10: the bookseller is not paranasal. sent11: the fact that the snatch harangues cranberry if the snatch is not sociolinguistic or it is not Hollywood or both is not false. sent12: if something does not harangue cranberry and does uncoil Cronus it is not sternal. sent13: the slopshop is gluttonous and does not uncoil Cronus if there exists something such that the fact that it does harangue cranberry is not wrong. sent14: something that is not a kind of a buttermilk does uncoil snatch and is gluttonous. sent15: the talus does not uncoil snatch if the slopshop is gluttonous and uncoils Cronus. sent16: the bookseller is sternal or a buttermilk or both if it is not paranasal. sent17: if the snatch is not sociolinguistic then it does harangue cranberry. sent18: the promoter is a foolscap if the talus does not uncoil snatch. sent19: the fact that the applemint is gluttonous is not incorrect if the snatch is gluttonous. sent20: the snatch either is sociolinguistic or uncoils Cronus or both. sent21: the promoter is a foolscap but it is not a buttermilk if the talus does not uncoil snatch. sent22: the fact that the slopshop uncoils calk hold. sent23: if the slopshop is gluttonous thing that does not uncoil Cronus then the talus does not uncoil snatch. sent24: the fact that that that the snatch is not a kind of a buttermilk and does not uncoil snatch is not wrong is not right is true if it is not a foolscap.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snatch is either not sociolinguistic or not a Hollywood or both.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the snatch does harangue cranberry.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it harangues cranberry.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the slopshop is gluttonous but it does not uncoil Cronus.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: that the talus does not uncoil snatch hold.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the promoter is a kind of a foolscap but it is not a kind of a buttermilk.; int5 -> int6: the promoter is not a buttermilk.; sent16 & sent10 -> int7: the bookseller is sternal and/or it is a buttermilk.; int7 & sent9 & sent7 -> int8: the promoter is a buttermilk.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the applemint is not sternal.
sent12 -> int10: the applemint is not sternal if it does not harangue cranberry and it uncoils Cronus.; sent14 -> int11: the snatch uncoils snatch and is gluttonous if the fact that it is not a kind of a buttermilk is right.; sent1 & sent22 -> int12: the slopshop is paranasal.; sent6 & int12 -> int13: the snatch is not a buttermilk but it is a kind of a foolscap.; int13 -> int14: the snatch is not a buttermilk.; int11 & int14 -> int15: the snatch uncoils snatch and is gluttonous.; int15 -> int16: the snatch is gluttonous.; sent19 & int16 -> int17: the applemint is gluttonous.;
$hypothesis$ = the snatch is not sociolinguistic or non-Hollywood or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the slopshop uncoils calk it is paranasal. sent2: the snatch is not a Hittite. sent3: if something is gluttonous then the slopshop is not Hollywood. sent4: something is not sociolinguistic and/or it is not a Hollywood if it does uncoil Cronus. sent5: if the fact that the slopshop is a foolscap and it is sternal is right then that the snatch is not a foolscap is not incorrect. sent6: the snatch is both not a buttermilk and a foolscap if the slopshop is paranasal. sent7: if the bookseller is a buttermilk the promoter is a kind of a buttermilk. sent8: the slopshop is a kind of a foolscap that is sternal if it is non-paranasal. sent9: the promoter is a buttermilk if the bookseller is sternal. sent10: the bookseller is not paranasal. sent11: the fact that the snatch harangues cranberry if the snatch is not sociolinguistic or it is not Hollywood or both is not false. sent12: if something does not harangue cranberry and does uncoil Cronus it is not sternal. sent13: the slopshop is gluttonous and does not uncoil Cronus if there exists something such that the fact that it does harangue cranberry is not wrong. sent14: something that is not a kind of a buttermilk does uncoil snatch and is gluttonous. sent15: the talus does not uncoil snatch if the slopshop is gluttonous and uncoils Cronus. sent16: the bookseller is sternal or a buttermilk or both if it is not paranasal. sent17: if the snatch is not sociolinguistic then it does harangue cranberry. sent18: the promoter is a foolscap if the talus does not uncoil snatch. sent19: the fact that the applemint is gluttonous is not incorrect if the snatch is gluttonous. sent20: the snatch either is sociolinguistic or uncoils Cronus or both. sent21: the promoter is a foolscap but it is not a buttermilk if the talus does not uncoil snatch. sent22: the fact that the slopshop uncoils calk hold. sent23: if the slopshop is gluttonous thing that does not uncoil Cronus then the talus does not uncoil snatch. sent24: the fact that that that the snatch is not a kind of a buttermilk and does not uncoil snatch is not wrong is not right is true if it is not a foolscap. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snatch is either not sociolinguistic or not a Hollywood or both.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the snatch does harangue cranberry.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it harangues cranberry.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the slopshop is gluttonous but it does not uncoil Cronus.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: that the talus does not uncoil snatch hold.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the promoter is a kind of a foolscap but it is not a kind of a buttermilk.; int5 -> int6: the promoter is not a buttermilk.; sent16 & sent10 -> int7: the bookseller is sternal and/or it is a buttermilk.; int7 & sent9 & sent7 -> int8: the promoter is a buttermilk.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__