the fact that if the internment happens then not the express but the imperceptibleness occurs is false.
sent1: the criticizing demolition occurs. sent2: the aggression occurs. sent3: the chaffiness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the aggression but not the criticizing saccharin occurs is false then the expressing does not occur. sent5: if the heaping keratocele happens that the imperceptibleness happens is not wrong. sent6: the worrying does not occur. sent7: the shuddering does not occur and the gestationalness occurs if the uncivilness occurs. sent8: the mnemonicsness occurs if the lobbing fantail happens. sent9: the lobbing pliability does not occur. sent10: the hewing occurs. sent11: that the internment occurs is prevented by that the aggression but not the criticizing saccharin occurs. sent12: the chromatographicness and the intolerableness happens. sent13: the dew does not occur if that the internment does not occur but the dew happens is not true. sent14: the express does not occur if the aggression does not occur. sent15: if the worrying does not occur then the heaping keratocele occurs and the hewing happens. sent16: that the aggression occurs and the criticizing saccharin does not occur yields the internment. sent17: that the pitting section does not occur triggers that the lexicostatisticness and the nonsubmersibleness occurs. sent18: the fact that the hewing occurs is not incorrect if the worrying does not occur. sent19: that the meteoricness does not occur is caused by that the rodeo and the non-axillariness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aggression occurs but the criticizing saccharin does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the internment does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the internment happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the aggression happens and the criticizing saccharin does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the express does not occur.; sent15 & sent6 -> int5: both the heaping keratocele and the hewing happens.; int5 -> int6: the heaping keratocele happens.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the imperceptibleness occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the express does not occur and the imperceptibleness happens.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the dew does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the internment happens then not the express but the imperceptibleness occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the criticizing demolition occurs. sent2: the aggression occurs. sent3: the chaffiness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the aggression but not the criticizing saccharin occurs is false then the expressing does not occur. sent5: if the heaping keratocele happens that the imperceptibleness happens is not wrong. sent6: the worrying does not occur. sent7: the shuddering does not occur and the gestationalness occurs if the uncivilness occurs. sent8: the mnemonicsness occurs if the lobbing fantail happens. sent9: the lobbing pliability does not occur. sent10: the hewing occurs. sent11: that the internment occurs is prevented by that the aggression but not the criticizing saccharin occurs. sent12: the chromatographicness and the intolerableness happens. sent13: the dew does not occur if that the internment does not occur but the dew happens is not true. sent14: the express does not occur if the aggression does not occur. sent15: if the worrying does not occur then the heaping keratocele occurs and the hewing happens. sent16: that the aggression occurs and the criticizing saccharin does not occur yields the internment. sent17: that the pitting section does not occur triggers that the lexicostatisticness and the nonsubmersibleness occurs. sent18: the fact that the hewing occurs is not incorrect if the worrying does not occur. sent19: that the meteoricness does not occur is caused by that the rodeo and the non-axillariness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aggression occurs but the criticizing saccharin does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the internment does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the internment happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the aggression happens and the criticizing saccharin does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the express does not occur.; sent15 & sent6 -> int5: both the heaping keratocele and the hewing happens.; int5 -> int6: the heaping keratocele happens.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the imperceptibleness occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the express does not occur and the imperceptibleness happens.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__