the stern is Ambrosian.
sent1: the Bedlam is Ambrosian. sent2: the stern is an inscription if it is Ambrosian. sent3: if something is a waddle then it touts Molotov. sent4: that the Gael is a Illicium that is not stenographic is wrong. sent5: the stern is a kind of a dune but it does not indurate conciliation. sent6: if something does not indurate sultriness it is preventable and is a fleece. sent7: that the Bedlam does not tout Molotov hold if it is Nicaean and it is not a waddle. sent8: if something is a kind of an inscription then it does not indurate conciliation. sent9: that the stern does fleece and it is preventable does not hold. sent10: the stern is not preventable if that the Bedlam touts traitor and is a fleece is not right. sent11: something is Ambrosian if it is unpreventable. sent12: the Bedlam is not aeronautical. sent13: the stern does not tout Molotov. sent14: the Bedlam is a daisybush. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a fleece and it touts traitor the university does not indurate conciliation. sent16: the vaquero is a fleece. sent17: if something is a Helotium it is not a centrum. sent18: the stern does not tout traitor if the fact that the Bedlam is a kind of Ambrosian thing that is a waddle does not hold. sent19: the Bedlam touts Molotov. sent20: The Molotov touts Bedlam. sent21: that something touts traitor and it fleeces is incorrect if it does not indurate conciliation. sent22: the Bedlam is preventable and is not a kind of a sweatbox. sent23: if the fact that something is Nicaean and is not a waddle does not hold then it is an inscription.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Bedlam is Nicaean but it is not a kind of a waddle.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Bedlam does not tout Molotov.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that that the Bedlam is a kind of Nicaean thing that is not a waddle is true is false.; sent23 -> int4: if that the Bedlam is not non-Nicaean but it is not a waddle does not hold it is an inscription.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Bedlam is an inscription.; sent8 -> int6: if the Bedlam is a kind of an inscription it does not indurate conciliation.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Bedlam does not indurate conciliation.; sent21 -> int8: if the Bedlam does not indurate conciliation that it does tout traitor and it fleeces is not right.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the Bedlam does tout traitor and it does fleece is wrong.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: that the stern is not preventable is not wrong.; sent11 -> int11: if the stern is not preventable then it is Ambrosian.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the stern is not Ambrosian.
sent6 -> int12: the toque is preventable and it does fleece if it does not indurate sultriness.;
$hypothesis$ = the stern is Ambrosian. ; $context$ = sent1: the Bedlam is Ambrosian. sent2: the stern is an inscription if it is Ambrosian. sent3: if something is a waddle then it touts Molotov. sent4: that the Gael is a Illicium that is not stenographic is wrong. sent5: the stern is a kind of a dune but it does not indurate conciliation. sent6: if something does not indurate sultriness it is preventable and is a fleece. sent7: that the Bedlam does not tout Molotov hold if it is Nicaean and it is not a waddle. sent8: if something is a kind of an inscription then it does not indurate conciliation. sent9: that the stern does fleece and it is preventable does not hold. sent10: the stern is not preventable if that the Bedlam touts traitor and is a fleece is not right. sent11: something is Ambrosian if it is unpreventable. sent12: the Bedlam is not aeronautical. sent13: the stern does not tout Molotov. sent14: the Bedlam is a daisybush. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a fleece and it touts traitor the university does not indurate conciliation. sent16: the vaquero is a fleece. sent17: if something is a Helotium it is not a centrum. sent18: the stern does not tout traitor if the fact that the Bedlam is a kind of Ambrosian thing that is a waddle does not hold. sent19: the Bedlam touts Molotov. sent20: The Molotov touts Bedlam. sent21: that something touts traitor and it fleeces is incorrect if it does not indurate conciliation. sent22: the Bedlam is preventable and is not a kind of a sweatbox. sent23: if the fact that something is Nicaean and is not a waddle does not hold then it is an inscription. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Bedlam is Nicaean but it is not a kind of a waddle.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Bedlam does not tout Molotov.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that that the Bedlam is a kind of Nicaean thing that is not a waddle is true is false.; sent23 -> int4: if that the Bedlam is not non-Nicaean but it is not a waddle does not hold it is an inscription.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Bedlam is an inscription.; sent8 -> int6: if the Bedlam is a kind of an inscription it does not indurate conciliation.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Bedlam does not indurate conciliation.; sent21 -> int8: if the Bedlam does not indurate conciliation that it does tout traitor and it fleeces is not right.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the Bedlam does tout traitor and it does fleece is wrong.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: that the stern is not preventable is not wrong.; sent11 -> int11: if the stern is not preventable then it is Ambrosian.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__