the digitalization does not occur.
sent1: that the cobble occurs and the sighting happens does not hold if the skedaddling Dianthus does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the ovarianness and the workshop happens is wrong. sent3: that the step does not occur is brought about by that the sighting does not occur. sent4: if the dehiscentness does not occur then the fact that both the seiche and the briefing precariousness occurs is not right. sent5: the fact that the osseousness does not occur hold. sent6: the fact that the hinting occurs and the briefing camber happens is wrong. sent7: the chocking innocency does not occur. sent8: the stepping happens. sent9: the finedrawing arrowworm happens. sent10: if the sighting does not occur then the fact that the finedrawing arrowworm does not occur and/or the skedaddling Dianthus does not occur is not true. sent11: if the fact that the plutocraticness but not the briefing Ricardo occurs is wrong that the cobbling does not occur is not wrong. sent12: that the presidency and the finedrawing Nanning happens prevents the briefing potash. sent13: the skedaddling Dianthus does not occur if the finedrawing arrowworm happens and the digitalization happens. sent14: the step does not occur if the fact that that the cobbling and the sighting occurs is false hold. sent15: if the printableness happens and the Nazareneness happens that the hiring does not occur is true. sent16: the fact that the plutocraticness happens and the briefing Ricardo does not occur is not correct if the briefing exculpation does not occur. sent17: the presidency occurs. sent18: the chocking newt happens. sent19: if the fact that the cannibalism happens and the robustness happens is incorrect then the diversion does not occur. sent20: if the finedrawing Depokene does not occur then the fact that the mousiness and the irregularness occurs is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the digitalization happens is true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the finedrawing arrowworm occurs and the digitalization occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the skedaddling Dianthus does not occur is right.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the cobbling and the sighting occurs is not correct.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the stepping does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the digitalization occurs is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the digitalization does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cobble occurs and the sighting happens does not hold if the skedaddling Dianthus does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the ovarianness and the workshop happens is wrong. sent3: that the step does not occur is brought about by that the sighting does not occur. sent4: if the dehiscentness does not occur then the fact that both the seiche and the briefing precariousness occurs is not right. sent5: the fact that the osseousness does not occur hold. sent6: the fact that the hinting occurs and the briefing camber happens is wrong. sent7: the chocking innocency does not occur. sent8: the stepping happens. sent9: the finedrawing arrowworm happens. sent10: if the sighting does not occur then the fact that the finedrawing arrowworm does not occur and/or the skedaddling Dianthus does not occur is not true. sent11: if the fact that the plutocraticness but not the briefing Ricardo occurs is wrong that the cobbling does not occur is not wrong. sent12: that the presidency and the finedrawing Nanning happens prevents the briefing potash. sent13: the skedaddling Dianthus does not occur if the finedrawing arrowworm happens and the digitalization happens. sent14: the step does not occur if the fact that that the cobbling and the sighting occurs is false hold. sent15: if the printableness happens and the Nazareneness happens that the hiring does not occur is true. sent16: the fact that the plutocraticness happens and the briefing Ricardo does not occur is not correct if the briefing exculpation does not occur. sent17: the presidency occurs. sent18: the chocking newt happens. sent19: if the fact that the cannibalism happens and the robustness happens is incorrect then the diversion does not occur. sent20: if the finedrawing Depokene does not occur then the fact that the mousiness and the irregularness occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the digitalization happens is true.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the finedrawing arrowworm occurs and the digitalization occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the skedaddling Dianthus does not occur is right.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the cobbling and the sighting occurs is not correct.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the stepping does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__