the services is a vengeance.
sent1: the fact that the linkboy is both non-anti-semitic and not quadraphonic is incorrect if the put-put is not a urethrocele. sent2: the linkboy is not a Steinem if there exists something such that it does not multiply shoveler. sent3: the services is a kind of a vengeance if the spawner is quadraphonic. sent4: something is not a urethrocele if that it is not a Steinem or is not genial or both does not hold. sent5: if the spawner is not a seine and it is not a driftfish then the services is quadraphonic. sent6: the services is anti-semitic and it is a kind of a urethrocele if that the linkboy is not a Steinem is not false. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a teardrop that is a instructorship is not true if it is not a kind of a vengeance. sent8: that the fact that either the put-put is not a kind of a Steinem or it is not genial or both does not hold is correct if the mestiza does multiply shoveler. sent9: the spawner is not a kind of a seine. sent10: the services is not quadraphonic if it is not a urethrocele. sent11: the cacodyl patronages nonconformist. sent12: there exists something such that it multiplies shoveler and it is genial. sent13: if something that is quadraphonic is a vengeance it is not anti-semitic. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it multiplies shoveler and it is genial is wrong then the linkboy is not a Steinem. sent15: the spawner is not a kind of a vengeance if the services is a vengeance that is not anti-semitic. sent16: if that something does not multiply shoveler and is a commission is not correct the fact that it does multiply shoveler is not wrong. sent17: the cacodyl multiplies shoveler if it does patronage nonconformist. sent18: the spawner is not a seine and it is not a driftfish. sent19: the linkboy is a kind of a seine. sent20: there exists something such that the fact that it does multiply shoveler and it is genial is wrong. sent21: the spawner adjures and is provocative.
sent5 & sent18 -> int1: the services is quadraphonic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the services is a vengeance is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the services is quadraphonic and is a vengeance.; sent13 -> int3: if the services is quadraphonic and it is a kind of a vengeance it is not anti-semitic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the services is not anti-semitic.; sent20 & sent14 -> int5: the linkboy is not a Steinem.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the services is anti-semitic and is a urethrocele.; int6 -> int7: the services is anti-semitic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the services is a vengeance.
sent4 -> int9: if that the put-put is not a Steinem or it is not genial or both is not correct then it is not a urethrocele.; sent16 -> int10: if that the mestiza does not multiply shoveler but it is a commission is wrong it does multiply shoveler.; sent17 & sent11 -> int11: the cacodyl multiplies shoveler.; int11 -> int12: something does multiply shoveler.;
$hypothesis$ = the services is a vengeance. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the linkboy is both non-anti-semitic and not quadraphonic is incorrect if the put-put is not a urethrocele. sent2: the linkboy is not a Steinem if there exists something such that it does not multiply shoveler. sent3: the services is a kind of a vengeance if the spawner is quadraphonic. sent4: something is not a urethrocele if that it is not a Steinem or is not genial or both does not hold. sent5: if the spawner is not a seine and it is not a driftfish then the services is quadraphonic. sent6: the services is anti-semitic and it is a kind of a urethrocele if that the linkboy is not a Steinem is not false. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a teardrop that is a instructorship is not true if it is not a kind of a vengeance. sent8: that the fact that either the put-put is not a kind of a Steinem or it is not genial or both does not hold is correct if the mestiza does multiply shoveler. sent9: the spawner is not a kind of a seine. sent10: the services is not quadraphonic if it is not a urethrocele. sent11: the cacodyl patronages nonconformist. sent12: there exists something such that it multiplies shoveler and it is genial. sent13: if something that is quadraphonic is a vengeance it is not anti-semitic. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it multiplies shoveler and it is genial is wrong then the linkboy is not a Steinem. sent15: the spawner is not a kind of a vengeance if the services is a vengeance that is not anti-semitic. sent16: if that something does not multiply shoveler and is a commission is not correct the fact that it does multiply shoveler is not wrong. sent17: the cacodyl multiplies shoveler if it does patronage nonconformist. sent18: the spawner is not a seine and it is not a driftfish. sent19: the linkboy is a kind of a seine. sent20: there exists something such that the fact that it does multiply shoveler and it is genial is wrong. sent21: the spawner adjures and is provocative. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent18 -> int1: the services is quadraphonic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the services is a vengeance is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the services is quadraphonic and is a vengeance.; sent13 -> int3: if the services is quadraphonic and it is a kind of a vengeance it is not anti-semitic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the services is not anti-semitic.; sent20 & sent14 -> int5: the linkboy is not a Steinem.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the services is anti-semitic and is a urethrocele.; int6 -> int7: the services is anti-semitic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__