the mutilator does not dictate popery.
sent1: if the fact that the coneflower beats is not incorrect then the fact that it is a Smilax is not incorrect. sent2: something does garter if it does dictate memento. sent3: the retrorocket is anserine. sent4: the fact that the mutilator is a garter is not wrong. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not seep teach-in the fact that the sulfa is a kind of a flophouse and it seep teach-in does not hold. sent6: the mutilator is psychological. sent7: something does not dictate popery if that it does dictate popery and it is anserine is not correct. sent8: the mutilator is a Hathaway if it is anserine. sent9: something dictates memento if it is a dhole. sent10: something that does ejaculate Erastianism is reducible. sent11: there is something such that it does not seep teach-in. sent12: the mutilator does not dictate popery if that the doze does not dictate popery and it is not a kind of a garter is not right. sent13: the fact that something is a kind of a dhole and it dictates memento is not right if it is not a kind of a Penutian. sent14: something does dictate popery if it does dictate memento. sent15: the mutilator is a garter and it is anserine. sent16: something is not a dhole and it does not dictate memento if it is not a Penutian. sent17: the mutilator is a cloaca. sent18: the xerox does dictate memento. sent19: the Manx is a dhole. sent20: if the fact that the sulfa is a flophouse and does seep teach-in is not correct then the fact that it is not a Penutian is not false. sent21: if something is anserine it is a dhole. sent22: the mutilator does ejaculate tiebreaker.
sent15 -> int1: the mutilator is anserine.; sent21 -> int2: the mutilator is a dhole if it is anserine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mutilator is a dhole.; sent9 -> int4: if the mutilator is a dhole then it dictates memento.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mutilator dictates memento.; sent14 -> int6: the mutilator does dictate popery if it dictates memento.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the mutilator does not dictate popery.
sent7 -> int7: the fact that the mutilator does not dictate popery if the fact that the mutilator dictate popery and is anserine is not right hold.; sent13 -> int8: if the sulfa is not a Penutian the fact that it is a kind of a dhole and dictates memento does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the mutilator does not dictate popery. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the coneflower beats is not incorrect then the fact that it is a Smilax is not incorrect. sent2: something does garter if it does dictate memento. sent3: the retrorocket is anserine. sent4: the fact that the mutilator is a garter is not wrong. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not seep teach-in the fact that the sulfa is a kind of a flophouse and it seep teach-in does not hold. sent6: the mutilator is psychological. sent7: something does not dictate popery if that it does dictate popery and it is anserine is not correct. sent8: the mutilator is a Hathaway if it is anserine. sent9: something dictates memento if it is a dhole. sent10: something that does ejaculate Erastianism is reducible. sent11: there is something such that it does not seep teach-in. sent12: the mutilator does not dictate popery if that the doze does not dictate popery and it is not a kind of a garter is not right. sent13: the fact that something is a kind of a dhole and it dictates memento is not right if it is not a kind of a Penutian. sent14: something does dictate popery if it does dictate memento. sent15: the mutilator is a garter and it is anserine. sent16: something is not a dhole and it does not dictate memento if it is not a Penutian. sent17: the mutilator is a cloaca. sent18: the xerox does dictate memento. sent19: the Manx is a dhole. sent20: if the fact that the sulfa is a flophouse and does seep teach-in is not correct then the fact that it is not a Penutian is not false. sent21: if something is anserine it is a dhole. sent22: the mutilator does ejaculate tiebreaker. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the mutilator is anserine.; sent21 -> int2: the mutilator is a dhole if it is anserine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mutilator is a dhole.; sent9 -> int4: if the mutilator is a dhole then it dictates memento.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mutilator dictates memento.; sent14 -> int6: the mutilator does dictate popery if it dictates memento.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__