the sidewalk is not antemortem and is aculeate.
sent1: the fact that the sidewalk is non-old is not wrong. sent2: if there are unimpressive things the fact that the sidewalk is both not antemortem and aculeate is wrong. sent3: if the sidewalk is an old it is not antemortem and it is aculeate. sent4: that the sidewalk is antemortem thing that is aculeate does not hold. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not impressive that the sidewalk is antemortem and it is aculeate does not hold. sent6: the Simeon is a kind of old thing that is not impressive.
sent6 -> int1: the Simeon is not impressive.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not impressive.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the sidewalk is not antemortem but it is aculeate.
$hypothesis$ = the sidewalk is not antemortem and is aculeate. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the sidewalk is non-old is not wrong. sent2: if there are unimpressive things the fact that the sidewalk is both not antemortem and aculeate is wrong. sent3: if the sidewalk is an old it is not antemortem and it is aculeate. sent4: that the sidewalk is antemortem thing that is aculeate does not hold. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not impressive that the sidewalk is antemortem and it is aculeate does not hold. sent6: the Simeon is a kind of old thing that is not impressive. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the Simeon is not impressive.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not impressive.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__