the eosin does not tweet duodenum.
sent1: the fact that the gander is not an annual and is a Demotic does not hold if the fact that it is zoonotic is not incorrect. sent2: that something does not drag gander and is zoonotic is incorrect if it is not a wood-rat. sent3: the gander drags gander. sent4: something that is a kind of an outgo is a plum. sent5: the eosin is not an annual. sent6: if the seaquake is a kind of a phrenologist that is a kind of a Demotic it is not zoonotic. sent7: the eosin puts promethium and is not a kind of an annual if the gander is not annual. sent8: that the gander does not drag dejection and is a kind of a Nash does not hold. sent9: if that something does not drag dejection and is a Nash is not right then the fact that it is anguine is correct. sent10: that the eosin is not an annual hold if the gander is not annual. sent11: if the seaquake does tweet duodenum but it is not a phrenologist then the eosin does tweet duodenum. sent12: something is not a wood-rat if the fact that it is a badge that does not tweet odist does not hold. sent13: that something is not annual but it puts promethium is not true if that it is a plum is true. sent14: if the gander is anguine that the seaquake is a badge and does not tweet odist is not correct. sent15: if the fact that something is non-Demotic thing that is not a phrenologist does not hold it is a kind of a esthete. sent16: if something is not zoonotic the fact that it is non-Demotic thing that is not a phrenologist is not true. sent17: that the gander is non-annual thing that does drag gander is correct if the seaquake is not zoonotic. sent18: if the eosin puts promethium but it is not a kind of an annual then it does not tweet duodenum. sent19: the seaquake is not a kind of a phrenologist if the eosin is not a phrenologist. sent20: if the eosin puts promethium and it is an annual then it does not tweet duodenum. sent21: the slapstick is not zoonotic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not drag gander and it is zoonotic does not hold. sent22: the slapstick is an outgo. sent23: if the seaquake is not zoonotic then the gander drags gander. sent24: if the gander tweets duodenum but it is not an annual then it does not put promethium. sent25: the seaquake is a kind of a Demotic. sent26: the seaquake is a phrenologist.
sent26 & sent25 -> int1: the seaquake is a phrenologist that is a Demotic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the seaquake is not zoonotic.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the gander is not annual but it drags gander.; int3 -> int4: the gander is not a kind of an annual.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the eosin puts promethium and is not annual.; int5 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the eosin tweets duodenum.
$hypothesis$ = the eosin does not tweet duodenum. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gander is not an annual and is a Demotic does not hold if the fact that it is zoonotic is not incorrect. sent2: that something does not drag gander and is zoonotic is incorrect if it is not a wood-rat. sent3: the gander drags gander. sent4: something that is a kind of an outgo is a plum. sent5: the eosin is not an annual. sent6: if the seaquake is a kind of a phrenologist that is a kind of a Demotic it is not zoonotic. sent7: the eosin puts promethium and is not a kind of an annual if the gander is not annual. sent8: that the gander does not drag dejection and is a kind of a Nash does not hold. sent9: if that something does not drag dejection and is a Nash is not right then the fact that it is anguine is correct. sent10: that the eosin is not an annual hold if the gander is not annual. sent11: if the seaquake does tweet duodenum but it is not a phrenologist then the eosin does tweet duodenum. sent12: something is not a wood-rat if the fact that it is a badge that does not tweet odist does not hold. sent13: that something is not annual but it puts promethium is not true if that it is a plum is true. sent14: if the gander is anguine that the seaquake is a badge and does not tweet odist is not correct. sent15: if the fact that something is non-Demotic thing that is not a phrenologist does not hold it is a kind of a esthete. sent16: if something is not zoonotic the fact that it is non-Demotic thing that is not a phrenologist is not true. sent17: that the gander is non-annual thing that does drag gander is correct if the seaquake is not zoonotic. sent18: if the eosin puts promethium but it is not a kind of an annual then it does not tweet duodenum. sent19: the seaquake is not a kind of a phrenologist if the eosin is not a phrenologist. sent20: if the eosin puts promethium and it is an annual then it does not tweet duodenum. sent21: the slapstick is not zoonotic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not drag gander and it is zoonotic does not hold. sent22: the slapstick is an outgo. sent23: if the seaquake is not zoonotic then the gander drags gander. sent24: if the gander tweets duodenum but it is not an annual then it does not put promethium. sent25: the seaquake is a kind of a Demotic. sent26: the seaquake is a phrenologist. ; $proof$ = 
sent26 & sent25 -> int1: the seaquake is a phrenologist that is a Demotic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the seaquake is not zoonotic.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the gander is not annual but it drags gander.; int3 -> int4: the gander is not a kind of an annual.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the eosin puts promethium and is not annual.; int5 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__