the vestrywoman is ulcerative but it is not a Bonhoeffer.
sent1: the colonizer does not sniff impulsiveness if the fact that the fact that the mycomycin does not empty dhole and/or it does sniff impulsiveness is wrong is true. sent2: something that does pedicure empties Thorpe. sent3: if the fact that the diphenylhydantoin does not empty slinging and does not empty diphenylhydantoin is false then the fact that it does not empty slinging does not hold. sent4: the colonizer is not reductionist if the signaler is not reductionist. sent5: the signaler sniffs schlockmeister and is not a kind of a burst. sent6: the fact that the diphenylhydantoin does not empty slinging and does not empty diphenylhydantoin is not right. sent7: if the bay empties Thorpe and it is a Bonhoeffer then the colonizer does not pedicure. sent8: the bay is not careless. sent9: there is nothing such that it is careless or it is reductionist or both. sent10: the bay is a valuable. sent11: the ball is argentous if it empties slinging. sent12: the heartthrob does consolidate historiography and is a radial. sent13: if the diphenylhydantoin does empty slinging the ball does empty slinging. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is ulcerative and/or it is a Bonhoeffer is not true. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is careless or it is reductionist or both is not right then the fact that the bay empties Thorpe is right. sent16: the vestrywoman is both ulcerative and not a Bonhoeffer if the bay is not a kind of a Bonhoeffer. sent17: that the mycomycin does not empty dhole and/or does sniff impulsiveness is wrong if there is something such that it is argentous. sent18: the bay does not restart if that the colonizer does not sniff impulsiveness hold. sent19: there are non-ulcerative things. sent20: the fact that something is not a worse but it does sniff Catholic does not hold if it does not restart. sent21: the Catholic is not a Bonhoeffer. sent22: the signaler is not a pedicure. sent23: the fact that something is both ulcerative and not a Bonhoeffer does not hold if it does empty Thorpe. sent24: that the vestrywoman is reductionist thing that is not a Bonhoeffer if the signaler is not a Bonhoeffer hold.
sent9 -> int1: that the signaler is careless or is reductionist or both is false.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is careless and/or is reductionist is not correct.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the bay does empty Thorpe.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bay is a Bonhoeffer hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bay empties Thorpe and it is a Bonhoeffer.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the colonizer is not a pedicure.;
the fact that the vestrywoman is ulcerative but it is not a Bonhoeffer does not hold.
sent23 -> int6: the fact that the vestrywoman is ulcerative and is not a Bonhoeffer is not correct if it does empty Thorpe.; sent2 -> int7: the vestrywoman does empty Thorpe if it is a pedicure.; sent20 -> int8: that the bay is non-worse thing that sniffs Catholic does not hold if it does not restart.; sent3 & sent6 -> int9: the diphenylhydantoin does empty slinging.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the ball does empty slinging.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: the ball is argentous.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is argentous.; int12 & sent17 -> int13: that either the mycomycin does not empty dhole or it does sniff impulsiveness or both is not right.; sent1 & int13 -> int14: the colonizer does not sniff impulsiveness.; sent18 & int14 -> int15: the bay does not restart.; int8 & int15 -> int16: that the bay is not worse but it does sniff Catholic does not hold.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it is non-worse thing that does sniff Catholic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the vestrywoman is ulcerative but it is not a Bonhoeffer. ; $context$ = sent1: the colonizer does not sniff impulsiveness if the fact that the fact that the mycomycin does not empty dhole and/or it does sniff impulsiveness is wrong is true. sent2: something that does pedicure empties Thorpe. sent3: if the fact that the diphenylhydantoin does not empty slinging and does not empty diphenylhydantoin is false then the fact that it does not empty slinging does not hold. sent4: the colonizer is not reductionist if the signaler is not reductionist. sent5: the signaler sniffs schlockmeister and is not a kind of a burst. sent6: the fact that the diphenylhydantoin does not empty slinging and does not empty diphenylhydantoin is not right. sent7: if the bay empties Thorpe and it is a Bonhoeffer then the colonizer does not pedicure. sent8: the bay is not careless. sent9: there is nothing such that it is careless or it is reductionist or both. sent10: the bay is a valuable. sent11: the ball is argentous if it empties slinging. sent12: the heartthrob does consolidate historiography and is a radial. sent13: if the diphenylhydantoin does empty slinging the ball does empty slinging. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is ulcerative and/or it is a Bonhoeffer is not true. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is careless or it is reductionist or both is not right then the fact that the bay empties Thorpe is right. sent16: the vestrywoman is both ulcerative and not a Bonhoeffer if the bay is not a kind of a Bonhoeffer. sent17: that the mycomycin does not empty dhole and/or does sniff impulsiveness is wrong if there is something such that it is argentous. sent18: the bay does not restart if that the colonizer does not sniff impulsiveness hold. sent19: there are non-ulcerative things. sent20: the fact that something is not a worse but it does sniff Catholic does not hold if it does not restart. sent21: the Catholic is not a Bonhoeffer. sent22: the signaler is not a pedicure. sent23: the fact that something is both ulcerative and not a Bonhoeffer does not hold if it does empty Thorpe. sent24: that the vestrywoman is reductionist thing that is not a Bonhoeffer if the signaler is not a Bonhoeffer hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the signaler is careless or is reductionist or both is false.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is careless and/or is reductionist is not correct.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the bay does empty Thorpe.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bay is a Bonhoeffer hold.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bay empties Thorpe and it is a Bonhoeffer.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the colonizer is not a pedicure.; __UNKNOWN__