the fact that something is a kind of a Volgograd and it is a branchiopod is false.
sent1: the fact that the Stone is a branchiopod but it is not vagal is not true. sent2: the fact that the Ohioan is not vagal and it does not snuffle discomfort does not hold. sent3: that the Stone is a kind of a Volgograd is not wrong if there is something such that that it does not rally metformin and it does not crock is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the hollowware is not a treatment and not a Volgograd is not true. sent5: the fact that the metronome is not branchiopod is correct if there is something such that that it is a Volgograd and it does rally metformin is wrong. sent6: there is something such that it is a telegrapher. sent7: if something is not a kind of a crock that it is a kind of a Volgograd and rallies metformin is not correct. sent8: that that that the damson does not rally metformin and it is not a crock hold is wrong is true. sent9: if something is fossil or nails baize or both the Stone is branchiopod. sent10: if the obscurantist is vagal it is fossil. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a kind of an ejection and snuffles hollowware is incorrect. sent12: the Stone is a kind of a preoccupancy. sent13: the obscurantist is vagal. sent14: that if something is vagal that it does not flame and it is not a fossil is wrong is not wrong. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is an ejection and it does snuffle hollowware is false then the obscurantist is not a kind of a crock. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a nous and a enology is not correct.
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the obscurantist is not non-fossil.; int1 -> int2: the obscurantist is fossil and/or it does nail baize.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a fossil and/or does nail baize.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the Stone is a branchiopod.; sent8 -> int5: there exists something such that that it does not rally metformin and does not crock is not right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the Stone is a Volgograd.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the Stone is a Volgograd that is a kind of a branchiopod.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the metronome does not flame and it is not a kind of a fossil does not hold.
sent14 -> int8: that the metronome does not flame and it is not a fossil does not hold if it is vagal.; sent7 -> int9: that the obscurantist is a kind of a Volgograd and it does rally metformin is incorrect if it is not a crock.; sent11 & sent15 -> int10: the obscurantist does not crock.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the obscurantist is a kind of a Volgograd that does rally metformin is wrong.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is a Volgograd and rallies metformin is incorrect.; int12 & sent5 -> int13: the metronome is not a kind of a branchiopod.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is a kind of a Volgograd and it is a branchiopod is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Stone is a branchiopod but it is not vagal is not true. sent2: the fact that the Ohioan is not vagal and it does not snuffle discomfort does not hold. sent3: that the Stone is a kind of a Volgograd is not wrong if there is something such that that it does not rally metformin and it does not crock is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the hollowware is not a treatment and not a Volgograd is not true. sent5: the fact that the metronome is not branchiopod is correct if there is something such that that it is a Volgograd and it does rally metformin is wrong. sent6: there is something such that it is a telegrapher. sent7: if something is not a kind of a crock that it is a kind of a Volgograd and rallies metformin is not correct. sent8: that that that the damson does not rally metformin and it is not a crock hold is wrong is true. sent9: if something is fossil or nails baize or both the Stone is branchiopod. sent10: if the obscurantist is vagal it is fossil. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a kind of an ejection and snuffles hollowware is incorrect. sent12: the Stone is a kind of a preoccupancy. sent13: the obscurantist is vagal. sent14: that if something is vagal that it does not flame and it is not a fossil is wrong is not wrong. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is an ejection and it does snuffle hollowware is false then the obscurantist is not a kind of a crock. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a nous and a enology is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the obscurantist is not non-fossil.; int1 -> int2: the obscurantist is fossil and/or it does nail baize.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a fossil and/or does nail baize.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the Stone is a branchiopod.; sent8 -> int5: there exists something such that that it does not rally metformin and does not crock is not right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the Stone is a Volgograd.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the Stone is a Volgograd that is a kind of a branchiopod.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__