the clumber does subtilize latke.
sent1: the publication does not glaze oligodendrocyte if something does ogle heterology and it is a kind of a sackcloth. sent2: there is something such that it ogles heterology. sent3: The batfish grasps publication. sent4: the apse ogles heterology. sent5: the apse does glaze oligodendrocyte if either something does glaze Ursus or it does not glaze immunogenicity or both. sent6: the fact that the scorekeeper is cacodemonic or it does not ogle heterology or both is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that it glazes oligodendrocyte and it does subtilize latke. sent8: the carrycot is ribless. sent9: if the apse does not glaze dika and subtilizes latke then the clumber subtilizes latke. sent10: something glazes dika if it does glaze oligodendrocyte. sent11: the clumber is a kind of a sackcloth and does subtilize Narcissus. sent12: the clumber does not subtilize latke if the apse is not a kind of a sackcloth. sent13: the paperknife is a EHF if something is not a semicircle. sent14: if the fact that either the scorekeeper is cacodemonic or it does not ogle heterology or both is not true the zither ogle heterology. sent15: something glazes Ursus and/or it does not glaze immunogenicity. sent16: the zither is a kind of a sackcloth if the carrycot is ribless. sent17: the fact that the clumber ogles heterology is true if there exists something such that it does grasp batfish or it does not subtilize latke or both. sent18: the publication is not a sackcloth. sent19: the apse does grasp batfish. sent20: the publication ogles heterology if it does grasp batfish. sent21: the apse is a kind of a Oxandra. sent22: the antilepton does grasp batfish and it ogles detail. sent23: the publication grasps batfish. sent24: the publication does not ogle heterology if something that does glaze dika is a sackcloth. sent25: the clumber does not glaze Ursus. sent26: the publication does not grasp batfish if the apse does not ogle heterology. sent27: the clumber grasps batfish. sent28: the fact that the clumber is a sackcloth hold.
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the apse glazes oligodendrocyte.; sent10 -> int2: if the apse does glaze oligodendrocyte then it glazes dika.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the apse glazes dika.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apse is a kind of a sackcloth.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the apse does glaze dika and it is a sackcloth.; int4 -> int5: that something does glaze dika and is a kind of a sackcloth is true.; int5 & sent24 -> int6: the publication does not ogle heterology.; sent20 & sent23 -> int7: the publication does ogle heterology.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the apse is not a sackcloth.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the clumber subtilizes latke.
sent14 & sent6 -> int10: the zither ogles heterology.; sent16 & sent8 -> int11: the zither is a sackcloth.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the zither ogles heterology and is a sackcloth.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it ogles heterology and it is a kind of a sackcloth is correct.; int13 & sent1 -> int14: the publication does not glaze oligodendrocyte.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it does not glaze oligodendrocyte.;
$hypothesis$ = the clumber does subtilize latke. ; $context$ = sent1: the publication does not glaze oligodendrocyte if something does ogle heterology and it is a kind of a sackcloth. sent2: there is something such that it ogles heterology. sent3: The batfish grasps publication. sent4: the apse ogles heterology. sent5: the apse does glaze oligodendrocyte if either something does glaze Ursus or it does not glaze immunogenicity or both. sent6: the fact that the scorekeeper is cacodemonic or it does not ogle heterology or both is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that it glazes oligodendrocyte and it does subtilize latke. sent8: the carrycot is ribless. sent9: if the apse does not glaze dika and subtilizes latke then the clumber subtilizes latke. sent10: something glazes dika if it does glaze oligodendrocyte. sent11: the clumber is a kind of a sackcloth and does subtilize Narcissus. sent12: the clumber does not subtilize latke if the apse is not a kind of a sackcloth. sent13: the paperknife is a EHF if something is not a semicircle. sent14: if the fact that either the scorekeeper is cacodemonic or it does not ogle heterology or both is not true the zither ogle heterology. sent15: something glazes Ursus and/or it does not glaze immunogenicity. sent16: the zither is a kind of a sackcloth if the carrycot is ribless. sent17: the fact that the clumber ogles heterology is true if there exists something such that it does grasp batfish or it does not subtilize latke or both. sent18: the publication is not a sackcloth. sent19: the apse does grasp batfish. sent20: the publication ogles heterology if it does grasp batfish. sent21: the apse is a kind of a Oxandra. sent22: the antilepton does grasp batfish and it ogles detail. sent23: the publication grasps batfish. sent24: the publication does not ogle heterology if something that does glaze dika is a sackcloth. sent25: the clumber does not glaze Ursus. sent26: the publication does not grasp batfish if the apse does not ogle heterology. sent27: the clumber grasps batfish. sent28: the fact that the clumber is a sackcloth hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the apse glazes oligodendrocyte.; sent10 -> int2: if the apse does glaze oligodendrocyte then it glazes dika.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the apse glazes dika.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apse is a kind of a sackcloth.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the apse does glaze dika and it is a sackcloth.; int4 -> int5: that something does glaze dika and is a kind of a sackcloth is true.; int5 & sent24 -> int6: the publication does not ogle heterology.; sent20 & sent23 -> int7: the publication does ogle heterology.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the apse is not a sackcloth.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__