the fact that the beechnut does cope scrag and it is a kind of a cancellation is not true.
sent1: if the roper does not cope scrag then that the beechnut does cope scrag and is a kind of a cancellation is not correct. sent2: the roper is a playroom or is not nonprehensile or both if it does not cope scrag. sent3: that the beechnut is a cancellation hold if the Oriental is nonprehensile. sent4: that the scrag is not uncharitable and/or is not a playroom is false. sent5: the Oriental does lurch blocking if the antilepton carols chill and/or does not cope livestock. sent6: something is nonprehensile or it lurches blocking or both if it is not false. sent7: there exists something such that that it is not a khoum and/or is a rink is not right. sent8: the fact that the Oriental lurches blocking and is nonprehensile is not true. sent9: the antilepton is not a kind of a playroom if the scrag does cope livestock. sent10: if there is something such that that it is not subcortical and it is not a fettle is not true the fact that the beechnut is not a kind of a playroom is not incorrect. sent11: that something is a kind of non-subcortical thing that is not a fettle does not hold if it is not a kind of a duff. sent12: something is not false if that it is dictyopteran thing that is not a Bronte is wrong. sent13: that something is uncharitable and it does cope scrag is right if it is not a playroom. sent14: that the roper does not cope scrag is true if the Oriental does lurch blocking. sent15: the antilepton is not uncharitable if the fact that the scrag either is not a playroom or is not nonprehensile or both is not right. sent16: if the antilepton does not cope scrag it is a cancellation or it is uncharitable or both. sent17: if the antilepton is not nonprehensile it is uncharitable and/or it does not carol chill. sent18: the fact that the Oriental is dictyopteran but it is not a Bronte is not correct. sent19: the roper is not a duff if there exists something such that that it is not a khoum or it is a rink or both is not correct. sent20: if something is not uncharitable then it carols chill or it does not cope livestock or both.
sent20 -> int1: if the antilepton is not uncharitable it carols chill and/or does not cope livestock.;
the beechnut copes scrag and is a cancellation.
sent13 -> int2: the beechnut is uncharitable and it does cope scrag if it is not a playroom.; sent11 -> int3: the fact that the roper is not subcortical and is not a fettle is not right if the fact that it is not a duff is not false.; sent7 & sent19 -> int4: the roper is not a duff.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the roper is not subcortical and it is not a kind of a fettle is not right.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is non-subcortical and it does not fettle is wrong.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the beechnut is not a playroom.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the beechnut is a kind of uncharitable thing that copes scrag is right.; int8 -> int9: the beechnut copes scrag.; sent6 -> int10: if the Oriental is not false it is nonprehensile and/or it lurches blocking.; sent12 -> int11: if that the Oriental is dictyopteran and not a Bronte does not hold it is not false.; int11 & sent18 -> int12: the Oriental is not false.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the Oriental is not prehensile or does lurch blocking or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the beechnut does cope scrag and it is a kind of a cancellation is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the roper does not cope scrag then that the beechnut does cope scrag and is a kind of a cancellation is not correct. sent2: the roper is a playroom or is not nonprehensile or both if it does not cope scrag. sent3: that the beechnut is a cancellation hold if the Oriental is nonprehensile. sent4: that the scrag is not uncharitable and/or is not a playroom is false. sent5: the Oriental does lurch blocking if the antilepton carols chill and/or does not cope livestock. sent6: something is nonprehensile or it lurches blocking or both if it is not false. sent7: there exists something such that that it is not a khoum and/or is a rink is not right. sent8: the fact that the Oriental lurches blocking and is nonprehensile is not true. sent9: the antilepton is not a kind of a playroom if the scrag does cope livestock. sent10: if there is something such that that it is not subcortical and it is not a fettle is not true the fact that the beechnut is not a kind of a playroom is not incorrect. sent11: that something is a kind of non-subcortical thing that is not a fettle does not hold if it is not a kind of a duff. sent12: something is not false if that it is dictyopteran thing that is not a Bronte is wrong. sent13: that something is uncharitable and it does cope scrag is right if it is not a playroom. sent14: that the roper does not cope scrag is true if the Oriental does lurch blocking. sent15: the antilepton is not uncharitable if the fact that the scrag either is not a playroom or is not nonprehensile or both is not right. sent16: if the antilepton does not cope scrag it is a cancellation or it is uncharitable or both. sent17: if the antilepton is not nonprehensile it is uncharitable and/or it does not carol chill. sent18: the fact that the Oriental is dictyopteran but it is not a Bronte is not correct. sent19: the roper is not a duff if there exists something such that that it is not a khoum or it is a rink or both is not correct. sent20: if something is not uncharitable then it carols chill or it does not cope livestock or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: if the antilepton is not uncharitable it carols chill and/or does not cope livestock.; __UNKNOWN__