that the undemocraticness occurs but the gape does not occur is brought about by the citifying cocobolo.
sent1: that the undemocraticness does not occur leads to that both the unprovocativeness and the gaping occurs. sent2: the anatomicness happens. sent3: if the Britishness and the citifying cocobolo occurs then that the reach does not occur hold. sent4: if the theme does not occur the fact that not the inspection but the undemocraticness happens does not hold. sent5: if the biopsy occurs and the genuineness occurs then the beholding does not occur. sent6: the fact that the undemocraticness does not occur hold if the fact that that the inspection does not occur and the undemocraticness happens hold is not right. sent7: if the reach does not occur then the plumbing does not occur. sent8: the theme does not occur. sent9: the uplifting occurs. sent10: the fact that the pargeting does not occur is right. sent11: the glittering and the British happens if the citifying cocobolo does not occur. sent12: if the building Transcaucasia occurs and the braiding fructose occurs the unpunctualness does not occur. sent13: the British happens. sent14: that the undemocraticness happens but the gape does not occur is caused by that the plumbing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the citifying cocobolo happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the British occurs and the citifying cocobolo happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the reaching does not occur.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the plumbing does not occur.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the undemocraticness but not the gape happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the glitter happens and the clutter happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the undemocraticness occurs but the gape does not occur is brought about by the citifying cocobolo. ; $context$ = sent1: that the undemocraticness does not occur leads to that both the unprovocativeness and the gaping occurs. sent2: the anatomicness happens. sent3: if the Britishness and the citifying cocobolo occurs then that the reach does not occur hold. sent4: if the theme does not occur the fact that not the inspection but the undemocraticness happens does not hold. sent5: if the biopsy occurs and the genuineness occurs then the beholding does not occur. sent6: the fact that the undemocraticness does not occur hold if the fact that that the inspection does not occur and the undemocraticness happens hold is not right. sent7: if the reach does not occur then the plumbing does not occur. sent8: the theme does not occur. sent9: the uplifting occurs. sent10: the fact that the pargeting does not occur is right. sent11: the glittering and the British happens if the citifying cocobolo does not occur. sent12: if the building Transcaucasia occurs and the braiding fructose occurs the unpunctualness does not occur. sent13: the British happens. sent14: that the undemocraticness happens but the gape does not occur is caused by that the plumbing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the citifying cocobolo happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the British occurs and the citifying cocobolo happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the reaching does not occur.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the plumbing does not occur.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the undemocraticness but not the gape happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__