the dotterel is a Unitarian.
sent1: the part-owner is not a Unitarian. sent2: the dotterel is physicochemical but it is non-staccato. sent3: if something is synaptic and gears betrothal the divide is not invasive. sent4: something does not gear chafed. sent5: something is both physicochemical and not clonic if it is not subarctic. sent6: if something does not gear part-owner and is a kind of a foul it is not a Unitarian. sent7: something that is not staccato does not gear part-owner and fouls. sent8: the dotterel is not a kind of a fritter. sent9: if there is something such that it does not gear chafed then either the tracer is not a manhood or it does not factor or both. sent10: that something does not gear part-owner is true if it is not staccato. sent11: if the geezer is a kind of intramolecular thing that is a freshet then the boathouse is not subarctic. sent12: if the tracer is not a manhood it is synaptic. sent13: the tracer gears betrothal and it is blastoporal. sent14: the geezer is a kind of intramolecular a freshet if the divide is not invasive. sent15: the dotterel is physicochemical. sent16: if something that gears part-owner is a foul then the fact that it is not Unitarian is not wrong. sent17: the fact that the dotterel is not Unitarian hold if it gears part-owner and it is foul. sent18: the cope is not physicochemical. sent19: if the dotterel is not staccato it does not gear part-owner. sent20: if the tracer does not factor it is synaptic. sent21: the dotterel does not gear part-owner. sent22: the train is not a kind of a touchline and is staccato if the boathouse is a Unitarian.
sent7 -> int1: if the dotterel is non-staccato then it does not gear part-owner and is not non-foul.; sent2 -> int2: the dotterel is not staccato.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dotterel does not gear part-owner but it does foul.; sent6 -> int4: if the dotterel does not gear part-owner and is foul it is not a Unitarian.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the train is not a touchline and gears part-owner.
$hypothesis$ = the dotterel is a Unitarian. ; $context$ = sent1: the part-owner is not a Unitarian. sent2: the dotterel is physicochemical but it is non-staccato. sent3: if something is synaptic and gears betrothal the divide is not invasive. sent4: something does not gear chafed. sent5: something is both physicochemical and not clonic if it is not subarctic. sent6: if something does not gear part-owner and is a kind of a foul it is not a Unitarian. sent7: something that is not staccato does not gear part-owner and fouls. sent8: the dotterel is not a kind of a fritter. sent9: if there is something such that it does not gear chafed then either the tracer is not a manhood or it does not factor or both. sent10: that something does not gear part-owner is true if it is not staccato. sent11: if the geezer is a kind of intramolecular thing that is a freshet then the boathouse is not subarctic. sent12: if the tracer is not a manhood it is synaptic. sent13: the tracer gears betrothal and it is blastoporal. sent14: the geezer is a kind of intramolecular a freshet if the divide is not invasive. sent15: the dotterel is physicochemical. sent16: if something that gears part-owner is a foul then the fact that it is not Unitarian is not wrong. sent17: the fact that the dotterel is not Unitarian hold if it gears part-owner and it is foul. sent18: the cope is not physicochemical. sent19: if the dotterel is not staccato it does not gear part-owner. sent20: if the tracer does not factor it is synaptic. sent21: the dotterel does not gear part-owner. sent22: the train is not a kind of a touchline and is staccato if the boathouse is a Unitarian. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the dotterel is non-staccato then it does not gear part-owner and is not non-foul.; sent2 -> int2: the dotterel is not staccato.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dotterel does not gear part-owner but it does foul.; sent6 -> int4: if the dotterel does not gear part-owner and is foul it is not a Unitarian.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__