that the cameo is not a kind of a detonator is true.
sent1: the cameo is not biotypic. sent2: if the fact that something hitches Nabu but it is not biotypic is wrong then it pant-hoots. sent3: that the cameo is not a detonator is not incorrect if the donor does pant-hoot and does thirst propylthiouracil. sent4: the donor is a kind of a paygrade that hitches symphysis. sent5: that something is unprofessional but it does not scream phototherapy is wrong if it does not pant-hoot. sent6: the donor thirsts propylthiouracil if the steelyard is not evitable but it does thirsts propylthiouracil. sent7: the fact that the donor is not a paygrade is true if it hitches Nabu and it is not biotypic. sent8: the hydrant is not a kind of a divorce.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the donor does hitch Nabu but it is not biotypic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the donor is not a kind of a paygrade.; sent4 -> int2: the donor is a paygrade.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the donor hitches Nabu but it is not biotypic is incorrect.; sent2 -> int5: the donor pant-hoots if that it does hitch Nabu and it is not biotypic is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the donor pant-hoots.; sent8 -> int7: something does not divorce.;
the fact that the symphysis is unprofessional but it does not scream phototherapy is not true.
sent5 -> int8: that the symphysis is unprofessional and does not scream phototherapy does not hold if it does not pant-hoot.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cameo is not a kind of a detonator is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the cameo is not biotypic. sent2: if the fact that something hitches Nabu but it is not biotypic is wrong then it pant-hoots. sent3: that the cameo is not a detonator is not incorrect if the donor does pant-hoot and does thirst propylthiouracil. sent4: the donor is a kind of a paygrade that hitches symphysis. sent5: that something is unprofessional but it does not scream phototherapy is wrong if it does not pant-hoot. sent6: the donor thirsts propylthiouracil if the steelyard is not evitable but it does thirsts propylthiouracil. sent7: the fact that the donor is not a paygrade is true if it hitches Nabu and it is not biotypic. sent8: the hydrant is not a kind of a divorce. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the donor does hitch Nabu but it is not biotypic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the donor is not a kind of a paygrade.; sent4 -> int2: the donor is a paygrade.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the donor hitches Nabu but it is not biotypic is incorrect.; sent2 -> int5: the donor pant-hoots if that it does hitch Nabu and it is not biotypic is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the donor pant-hoots.; sent8 -> int7: something does not divorce.; __UNKNOWN__