the Frenching diarist does not occur and the crosscheck does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the devitalization does not occur and the endgame does not occur is not right if the uncomfortableness happens. sent2: that the concussion does not occur and the comeback does not occur is not right if that the juncture does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the proliferating dub occurs. sent4: if the proliferating Geastrum happens the fact that the fluorescence does not occur but the rub happens does not hold. sent5: if the proliferating class happens the fact that the Frenching diarist does not occur and the crosscheck does not occur is not true. sent6: the fact that the snicking bubble occurs but the snicking class does not occur is not correct. sent7: the juncture happens. sent8: that the Frenching neon occurs but the specialism does not occur is wrong. sent9: the proliferating shoehorn happens. sent10: the fact that the inalienableness does not occur and the bit does not occur is incorrect. sent11: the juncture prevents that the proliferating class does not occur. sent12: that not the Frenching skinny-dip but the verdict happens does not hold. sent13: the hurrahing happens if the dialectalness happens. sent14: the snicking seconder happens. sent15: the fact that the plotting laurel-tree does not occur and the unacceptableness does not occur is wrong. sent16: if the proliferating Kotex happens the fact that the utilization but not the plotting laurel-tree happens does not hold. sent17: the fact that the stipulation occurs but the snicking bubble does not occur is wrong. sent18: the fact that the tempest does not occur and the sting does not occur is wrong if the proliferating motorcyclist occurs. sent19: if the rubbing happens then the fact that that the Liberian but not the editorship occurs is not wrong is false.
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the proliferating class happens.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the concussion does not occur and the comeback does not occur is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the Frenching diarist does not occur and the crosscheck does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the devitalization does not occur and the endgame does not occur is not right if the uncomfortableness happens. sent2: that the concussion does not occur and the comeback does not occur is not right if that the juncture does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the proliferating dub occurs. sent4: if the proliferating Geastrum happens the fact that the fluorescence does not occur but the rub happens does not hold. sent5: if the proliferating class happens the fact that the Frenching diarist does not occur and the crosscheck does not occur is not true. sent6: the fact that the snicking bubble occurs but the snicking class does not occur is not correct. sent7: the juncture happens. sent8: that the Frenching neon occurs but the specialism does not occur is wrong. sent9: the proliferating shoehorn happens. sent10: the fact that the inalienableness does not occur and the bit does not occur is incorrect. sent11: the juncture prevents that the proliferating class does not occur. sent12: that not the Frenching skinny-dip but the verdict happens does not hold. sent13: the hurrahing happens if the dialectalness happens. sent14: the snicking seconder happens. sent15: the fact that the plotting laurel-tree does not occur and the unacceptableness does not occur is wrong. sent16: if the proliferating Kotex happens the fact that the utilization but not the plotting laurel-tree happens does not hold. sent17: the fact that the stipulation occurs but the snicking bubble does not occur is wrong. sent18: the fact that the tempest does not occur and the sting does not occur is wrong if the proliferating motorcyclist occurs. sent19: if the rubbing happens then the fact that that the Liberian but not the editorship occurs is not wrong is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the proliferating class happens.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__