there is something such that if that it is a Carpocapsa is not false then that it does not fool Ptolemy and it is animatistic is incorrect.
sent1: if the antidiuretic is a clogging the fact that it is a kind of a rent and it does fool Ptolemy is not true. sent2: the fact that something is both not a barterer and carpellary does not hold if it does fool cravenness. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Carpocapsa it does not fool Ptolemy and is animatistic. sent4: if something rents then it is not a kind of a Gopherus and it is symphonic. sent5: if the antidiuretic is cyclopean then the fact that it is not a Carpocapsa and does fool flyleaf is not right. sent6: if something is thespian then the fact that it is not a kind of a workhorse and is egoistic is false. sent7: a nasopharyngeal thing is non-hierarchical a boo. sent8: the fact that something fools Ptolemy and it is animatistic is false if it is a kind of a Carpocapsa. sent9: if the antidiuretic is animatistic the fact that it is both not a brutalization and a clogging is false. sent10: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Carpocapsa that it fools Ptolemy and is animatistic does not hold. sent11: something does not fool Ptolemy and is animatistic if it is a Carpocapsa. sent12: if the antidiuretic is a Carpocapsa the fact that it does fool Ptolemy and it is animatistic does not hold. sent13: that something is not a martin and talks viceroyalty is incorrect if it skulks. sent14: if the antidiuretic is not non-annelid then that it is both not Tantric and a matrilineage is incorrect. sent15: the antidiuretic does not fool Ptolemy and is animatistic if it is a Carpocapsa. sent16: that something does not talk birdfeeder but it is nativist is incorrect if it is a Carpocapsa. sent17: if the flyleaf is thrifty then the fact that it does not fool Ptolemy and does talk Javanthropus is false. sent18: that something is a kind of Episcopal thing that is carpellary is incorrect if it is a kind of a nonaggression. sent19: if the striker does talk Converso then that it is not a Carpocapsa and does talk antidiuretic does not hold. sent20: the fact that something does not crank pronunciation and is a turnstile does not hold if it is a Canidae.
that the viceroyalty is not a workhorse but egoistic is not right if it is thespian.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a Carpocapsa is not false then that it does not fool Ptolemy and it is animatistic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the antidiuretic is a clogging the fact that it is a kind of a rent and it does fool Ptolemy is not true. sent2: the fact that something is both not a barterer and carpellary does not hold if it does fool cravenness. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Carpocapsa it does not fool Ptolemy and is animatistic. sent4: if something rents then it is not a kind of a Gopherus and it is symphonic. sent5: if the antidiuretic is cyclopean then the fact that it is not a Carpocapsa and does fool flyleaf is not right. sent6: if something is thespian then the fact that it is not a kind of a workhorse and is egoistic is false. sent7: a nasopharyngeal thing is non-hierarchical a boo. sent8: the fact that something fools Ptolemy and it is animatistic is false if it is a kind of a Carpocapsa. sent9: if the antidiuretic is animatistic the fact that it is both not a brutalization and a clogging is false. sent10: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Carpocapsa that it fools Ptolemy and is animatistic does not hold. sent11: something does not fool Ptolemy and is animatistic if it is a Carpocapsa. sent12: if the antidiuretic is a Carpocapsa the fact that it does fool Ptolemy and it is animatistic does not hold. sent13: that something is not a martin and talks viceroyalty is incorrect if it skulks. sent14: if the antidiuretic is not non-annelid then that it is both not Tantric and a matrilineage is incorrect. sent15: the antidiuretic does not fool Ptolemy and is animatistic if it is a Carpocapsa. sent16: that something does not talk birdfeeder but it is nativist is incorrect if it is a Carpocapsa. sent17: if the flyleaf is thrifty then the fact that it does not fool Ptolemy and does talk Javanthropus is false. sent18: that something is a kind of Episcopal thing that is carpellary is incorrect if it is a kind of a nonaggression. sent19: if the striker does talk Converso then that it is not a Carpocapsa and does talk antidiuretic does not hold. sent20: the fact that something does not crank pronunciation and is a turnstile does not hold if it is a Canidae. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__