the ostiole is not a kind of a parthenocarpy.
sent1: the fact that the ostiole is not a parthenocarpy and is a kind of a Dalmatian does not hold. sent2: the cinnabar is a cane. sent3: the ostiole is intestinal if there exists something such that that it is not Wilsonian and is a Dalmatian is not correct. sent4: if the cinnabar is a cane that the clunch is not Wilsonian and is a Dalmatian is not true. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a beachball and it is agranulocytic is false. sent6: there is something such that it is non-Wilsonian a Dalmatian.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: that the clunch is not Wilsonian but it is a Dalmatian does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not Wilsonian and it is Dalmatian is not correct.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the ostiole is intestinal.;
$hypothesis$ = the ostiole is not a kind of a parthenocarpy. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ostiole is not a parthenocarpy and is a kind of a Dalmatian does not hold. sent2: the cinnabar is a cane. sent3: the ostiole is intestinal if there exists something such that that it is not Wilsonian and is a Dalmatian is not correct. sent4: if the cinnabar is a cane that the clunch is not Wilsonian and is a Dalmatian is not true. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a beachball and it is agranulocytic is false. sent6: there is something such that it is non-Wilsonian a Dalmatian. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: that the clunch is not Wilsonian but it is a Dalmatian does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not Wilsonian and it is Dalmatian is not correct.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the ostiole is intestinal.; __UNKNOWN__