the salivation is a kind of a jellyfish but it is not a real.
sent1: something sandpapers salivation and is not coherent if it does balance. sent2: the salivation does not sandpaper salivation. sent3: the salivation is a kind of a jellyfish and is not a kind of a real if the seine is not a real. sent4: the fact that the sharpshooter is a jellyfish is not incorrect. sent5: if something is not a kind of a rondo then the fact that it sandpapers salivation and it is not coherent does not hold. sent6: something is both a real and not a jellyfish if it balances. sent7: the subordinate does sandpaper salivation. sent8: if the graze is not a rondo then that it is a real and does not sandpaper salivation is wrong. sent9: if the graze is a jellyfish it is a kind of a real and it is not a rondo. sent10: everything is not a rondo. sent11: the seine is not coherent.
sent1 -> int1: if the graze balances it does sandpaper salivation and it is not coherent.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the graze does balance.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the graze sandpapers salivation and is not coherent is not wrong.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the graze sandpapers salivation but it is not coherent does not hold if it is not a rondo.; sent10 -> int4: the graze is not a rondo.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the graze sandpapers salivation but it is not coherent is false.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the graze is not a kind of a balance.;
$hypothesis$ = the salivation is a kind of a jellyfish but it is not a real. ; $context$ = sent1: something sandpapers salivation and is not coherent if it does balance. sent2: the salivation does not sandpaper salivation. sent3: the salivation is a kind of a jellyfish and is not a kind of a real if the seine is not a real. sent4: the fact that the sharpshooter is a jellyfish is not incorrect. sent5: if something is not a kind of a rondo then the fact that it sandpapers salivation and it is not coherent does not hold. sent6: something is both a real and not a jellyfish if it balances. sent7: the subordinate does sandpaper salivation. sent8: if the graze is not a rondo then that it is a real and does not sandpaper salivation is wrong. sent9: if the graze is a jellyfish it is a kind of a real and it is not a rondo. sent10: everything is not a rondo. sent11: the seine is not coherent. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the graze balances it does sandpaper salivation and it is not coherent.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the graze does balance.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the graze sandpapers salivation and is not coherent is not wrong.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the graze sandpapers salivation but it is not coherent does not hold if it is not a rondo.; sent10 -> int4: the graze is not a rondo.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the graze sandpapers salivation but it is not coherent is false.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the graze is not a kind of a balance.; __UNKNOWN__