the Smitane is not quadratics.
sent1: the sink is not analogous if the breadbasket is analogous. sent2: something resists Bittacidae. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is morphologic and it resists shorts does not hold then the Smitane does not deserve Kendall. sent4: if there is something such that that it does not resist Bittacidae is true then the fact that the escapee resists shorts and is morphologic does not hold. sent5: the fact that the escapee is both rocky and not fresh does not hold if it is a parole. sent6: if something does not resist Bittacidae then the fact that it is morphologic and it resists shorts is not right. sent7: the fact that the sink is analogous and/or does not slog does not hold if the breadbasket is analogous. sent8: if something does not resist shorts then it does not deserve Kendall. sent9: the sink is not analogous. sent10: the Smitane is not morphologic. sent11: if the fact that something is rocky but it is not fresh does not hold the fact that it is not rocky hold. sent12: something is non-analogous and/or it does not slog if it does not deserve Kendall. sent13: if something that does not slog is not a quadratics then it is not analogous. sent14: if the foremast is not salable the sink resists shorts and it is not non-morphologic. sent15: that the sink is a kind of a hedgefund hold. sent16: the breadbasket does not resist shorts if the sink does resist shorts and it does resist Bittacidae. sent17: the breadbasket is analogous if that that the Smitane is not a quadratics is true does not hold. sent18: there is something such that it does not resist Bittacidae. sent19: the escapee is a parole and it is not non-shorts. sent20: if something is analogous then it is a kind of a quadratics. sent21: the foremast is not salable but cross-sectional if there is something such that it is not rocky. sent22: the sink does resist Bittacidae if it is a kind of a hedgefund. sent23: if the fact that the sink is analogous or it does not slog or both is not correct the foremast deserves Kendall. sent24: if the escapee is not morphologic the foremast does not deserve Kendall. sent25: if the Smitane does not deserve Kendall the foremast does not slog and it is not a kind of a quadratics.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Smitane is quadratics.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the breadbasket is analogous.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that either the sink is analogous or it does not slog or both is not true.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the fact that the foremast deserves Kendall is correct.; sent18 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the escapee resists shorts and is morphologic is wrong.;
the Smitane is a quadratics.
sent20 -> int5: the Smitane is quadratics if it is analogous.; sent12 -> int6: that if that the breadbasket does not deserve Kendall is true the breadbasket is not analogous and/or does not slog is not wrong.; sent8 -> int7: if the breadbasket does not resist shorts the fact that it does not deserve Kendall is not false.; sent11 -> int8: the fact that the escapee is not rocky is right if that it is rocky and is not fresh is wrong.; sent19 -> int9: the escapee is a parole.; sent5 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the escapee is rocky and not fresh is not right.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the escapee is not rocky.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is not rocky.; int12 & sent21 -> int13: the foremast is a kind of unsalable thing that is cross-sectional.; int13 -> int14: the foremast is unsalable.; sent14 & int14 -> int15: the sink resists shorts and is morphologic.; int15 -> int16: the sink does resist shorts.; sent22 & sent15 -> int17: the sink does resist Bittacidae.; int16 & int17 -> int18: the sink does resist shorts and does resist Bittacidae.; sent16 & int18 -> int19: the breadbasket does not resist shorts.; int7 & int19 -> int20: the breadbasket does not deserve Kendall.; int6 & int20 -> int21: the breadbasket is not analogous and/or does not slog.;
$hypothesis$ = the Smitane is not quadratics. ; $context$ = sent1: the sink is not analogous if the breadbasket is analogous. sent2: something resists Bittacidae. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is morphologic and it resists shorts does not hold then the Smitane does not deserve Kendall. sent4: if there is something such that that it does not resist Bittacidae is true then the fact that the escapee resists shorts and is morphologic does not hold. sent5: the fact that the escapee is both rocky and not fresh does not hold if it is a parole. sent6: if something does not resist Bittacidae then the fact that it is morphologic and it resists shorts is not right. sent7: the fact that the sink is analogous and/or does not slog does not hold if the breadbasket is analogous. sent8: if something does not resist shorts then it does not deserve Kendall. sent9: the sink is not analogous. sent10: the Smitane is not morphologic. sent11: if the fact that something is rocky but it is not fresh does not hold the fact that it is not rocky hold. sent12: something is non-analogous and/or it does not slog if it does not deserve Kendall. sent13: if something that does not slog is not a quadratics then it is not analogous. sent14: if the foremast is not salable the sink resists shorts and it is not non-morphologic. sent15: that the sink is a kind of a hedgefund hold. sent16: the breadbasket does not resist shorts if the sink does resist shorts and it does resist Bittacidae. sent17: the breadbasket is analogous if that that the Smitane is not a quadratics is true does not hold. sent18: there is something such that it does not resist Bittacidae. sent19: the escapee is a parole and it is not non-shorts. sent20: if something is analogous then it is a kind of a quadratics. sent21: the foremast is not salable but cross-sectional if there is something such that it is not rocky. sent22: the sink does resist Bittacidae if it is a kind of a hedgefund. sent23: if the fact that the sink is analogous or it does not slog or both is not correct the foremast deserves Kendall. sent24: if the escapee is not morphologic the foremast does not deserve Kendall. sent25: if the Smitane does not deserve Kendall the foremast does not slog and it is not a kind of a quadratics. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Smitane is quadratics.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the breadbasket is analogous.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that either the sink is analogous or it does not slog or both is not true.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the fact that the foremast deserves Kendall is correct.; sent18 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the escapee resists shorts and is morphologic is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__