that the gazebo is not a Nike and it is not a docking is not correct.
sent1: the beam is a kind of sociopathic thing that does evict pickled. sent2: the beam is not a appeaser but it clanks. sent3: the defense is not a kind of a cordwood and is epizoic. sent4: the tuft is not eusporangiate but it does perpetuate shower. sent5: that that the gazebo is not a Nike and does not dock hold is not true if the pollucite is not a kind of a Nike. sent6: if something that is knowable does not perpetuate Tampico then the gazebo does not evict greengrocer. sent7: the tuft is not modest. sent8: the beam docks. sent9: the fact that the tuft is a kind of an eyepiece that is knowable is not correct if that the melosa is not knowable is not incorrect. sent10: if the melosa is a docking and not a Nike the gazebo does not evict greengrocer. sent11: the fact that something is not a Nike and it is not a docking if it does not evict greengrocer is true. sent12: the beam is a grandee but it is not modest. sent13: something is not knowable if it does not perpetuate Tampico and evicts greengrocer. sent14: the beam is a grandee. sent15: the melosa is not a Nike if the beam is sociopathic but it is not a grandee. sent16: the pollucite is not a Nike if the fact that the tuft is not knowable hold. sent17: the melosa is sociopathic. sent18: the fact that the gazebo is a Nike but it is not a docking is false. sent19: if that the tuft is a kind of an eyepiece and is knowable is wrong the pollucite is not a Nike. sent20: the sheepdog is both not a grandee and a parturition. sent21: that the gazebo is not a Nike but it does dock is incorrect. sent22: the fact that the gazebo is not a Nike but it is a docking is false if the pollucite is not a Nike. sent23: that the gazebo is a Nike and is not a docking is incorrect if that the pollucite is not a Nike is right. sent24: the melosa evicts greengrocer and it is sociopathic.
sent24 -> int1: the melosa does evict greengrocer.; sent13 -> int2: the melosa is not knowable if it does not perpetuate Tampico and does evict greengrocer.;
the gazebo is not a Nike and it is not a docking.
sent11 -> int3: the gazebo is not a kind of a Nike and it does not dock if it does not evict greengrocer.;
$hypothesis$ = that the gazebo is not a Nike and it is not a docking is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the beam is a kind of sociopathic thing that does evict pickled. sent2: the beam is not a appeaser but it clanks. sent3: the defense is not a kind of a cordwood and is epizoic. sent4: the tuft is not eusporangiate but it does perpetuate shower. sent5: that that the gazebo is not a Nike and does not dock hold is not true if the pollucite is not a kind of a Nike. sent6: if something that is knowable does not perpetuate Tampico then the gazebo does not evict greengrocer. sent7: the tuft is not modest. sent8: the beam docks. sent9: the fact that the tuft is a kind of an eyepiece that is knowable is not correct if that the melosa is not knowable is not incorrect. sent10: if the melosa is a docking and not a Nike the gazebo does not evict greengrocer. sent11: the fact that something is not a Nike and it is not a docking if it does not evict greengrocer is true. sent12: the beam is a grandee but it is not modest. sent13: something is not knowable if it does not perpetuate Tampico and evicts greengrocer. sent14: the beam is a grandee. sent15: the melosa is not a Nike if the beam is sociopathic but it is not a grandee. sent16: the pollucite is not a Nike if the fact that the tuft is not knowable hold. sent17: the melosa is sociopathic. sent18: the fact that the gazebo is a Nike but it is not a docking is false. sent19: if that the tuft is a kind of an eyepiece and is knowable is wrong the pollucite is not a Nike. sent20: the sheepdog is both not a grandee and a parturition. sent21: that the gazebo is not a Nike but it does dock is incorrect. sent22: the fact that the gazebo is not a Nike but it is a docking is false if the pollucite is not a Nike. sent23: that the gazebo is a Nike and is not a docking is incorrect if that the pollucite is not a Nike is right. sent24: the melosa evicts greengrocer and it is sociopathic. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 -> int1: the melosa does evict greengrocer.; sent13 -> int2: the melosa is not knowable if it does not perpetuate Tampico and does evict greengrocer.; __UNKNOWN__