the fact that there exists something such that it does not shirk is incorrect.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a breeze and it is not a louvered is not correct then the fact that the bicorn does not shirk is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a breeze and it is a louvered is false. sent3: if the hand-me-down does not shirk the fact that the cenotaph is a kind of a breeze but it is not a forehanded is not true. sent4: there is something such that it is a forehanded. sent5: the fact that the cenotaph does shirk and does not redecorate monoxide is not correct. sent6: the hepadnavirus is not a center if the hand-me-down is not a breeze and it is not a louvered. sent7: there is something such that it is not a breeze and not a louvered. sent8: the fact that the cenotaph redecorates monoxide but it is not a kind of a forehanded is not true if the hepadnavirus is not a kind of a center. sent9: that the fact that the hand-me-down shirks but it is not center is wrong is true if the bicorn is not a breeze. sent10: that the hepadnavirus is non-center thing that does not redecorate pneumonectomy is not correct. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not a louvered and does not shirk does not hold the bicorn is not a kind of a center. sent12: the cenotaph does redecorate monoxide and is not a center. sent13: the fact that the cenotaph is not a kind of a forehanded but it breezes does not hold. sent14: the hepadnavirus is not a kind of a forehanded if the fact that the cenotaph does not shirk but it is forehanded is not correct. sent15: the cenotaph does redecorate monoxide and is not a forehanded. sent16: something does redecorate monoxide.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hand-me-down is not a kind of a breeze and it is not a louvered.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hepadnavirus is not center is not false.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the cenotaph redecorates monoxide but it is not forehanded is incorrect.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hand-me-down is not a breeze and is not a kind of a louvered does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a breeze and is not a louvered is not correct.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the bicorn does not shirk.; int6 -> hypothesis;
that the Almoravid is a kind of symbolic thing that is not a kind of a breeze does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it does not shirk is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a breeze and it is not a louvered is not correct then the fact that the bicorn does not shirk is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a breeze and it is a louvered is false. sent3: if the hand-me-down does not shirk the fact that the cenotaph is a kind of a breeze but it is not a forehanded is not true. sent4: there is something such that it is a forehanded. sent5: the fact that the cenotaph does shirk and does not redecorate monoxide is not correct. sent6: the hepadnavirus is not a center if the hand-me-down is not a breeze and it is not a louvered. sent7: there is something such that it is not a breeze and not a louvered. sent8: the fact that the cenotaph redecorates monoxide but it is not a kind of a forehanded is not true if the hepadnavirus is not a kind of a center. sent9: that the fact that the hand-me-down shirks but it is not center is wrong is true if the bicorn is not a breeze. sent10: that the hepadnavirus is non-center thing that does not redecorate pneumonectomy is not correct. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not a louvered and does not shirk does not hold the bicorn is not a kind of a center. sent12: the cenotaph does redecorate monoxide and is not a center. sent13: the fact that the cenotaph is not a kind of a forehanded but it breezes does not hold. sent14: the hepadnavirus is not a kind of a forehanded if the fact that the cenotaph does not shirk but it is forehanded is not correct. sent15: the cenotaph does redecorate monoxide and is not a forehanded. sent16: something does redecorate monoxide. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hand-me-down is not a kind of a breeze and it is not a louvered.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hepadnavirus is not center is not false.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the cenotaph redecorates monoxide but it is not forehanded is incorrect.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hand-me-down is not a breeze and is not a kind of a louvered does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a breeze and is not a louvered is not correct.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the bicorn does not shirk.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__