the tormenting sigeh does not occur and the tormenting insertion does not occur.
sent1: the tormenting sigeh does not occur if the proteinaceousness does not occur. sent2: that the tormenting insertion does not occur is triggered by that the nonintellectualness happens and the saunter occurs. sent3: the saunter happens. sent4: the nonintellectualness happens. sent5: that the proteinaceousness happens is prevented by that the hallelujah does not occur and the trooping Honduran does not occur.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: both the nonintellectualness and the saunter occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the tormenting insertion does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the tormenting sigeh does not occur and the tormenting insertion does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the tormenting sigeh does not occur if the proteinaceousness does not occur. sent2: that the tormenting insertion does not occur is triggered by that the nonintellectualness happens and the saunter occurs. sent3: the saunter happens. sent4: the nonintellectualness happens. sent5: that the proteinaceousness happens is prevented by that the hallelujah does not occur and the trooping Honduran does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: both the nonintellectualness and the saunter occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the tormenting insertion does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__