the fact that the overshoe is not clonic and/or ensconces is incorrect.
sent1: something is not clonic and/or it ensconces if it is a kind of a ascomycete. sent2: the carcinogen is an overwork and/or darts bisexual if there is something such that it is not a pleurisy. sent3: that the zinfandel is inadmissible is correct. sent4: everything is inadmissible and it does not guarantee. sent5: if something overworks then it is a pleurisy. sent6: everything is inadmissible. sent7: the overshoe crazes if the fact that the carcinogen does overwork is not incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the zinfandel is not a ascomycete is true the monad is not a pleurisy. sent9: if something crazes then it does not ensconce. sent10: if the overshoe does guarantee then it does ensconce. sent11: the overshoe is a craze if the carcinogen does dart bisexual. sent12: the overshoe does not ensconce if it is a craze. sent13: if something that is inadmissible is not a kind of a guarantee it is not a ascomycete. sent14: there is something such that it is a pleurisy.
sent4 -> int1: the zinfandel is both inadmissible and not a guarantee.; sent13 -> int2: the zinfandel is not a ascomycete if it is inadmissible and it is not a guarantee.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the zinfandel is not a kind of a ascomycete.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the monad is not a kind of a pleurisy.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a pleurisy.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the carcinogen either does overwork or does dart bisexual or both.; int6 & sent7 & sent11 -> int7: the overshoe is a craze.;
that the overshoe is not clonic or it does ensconce or both is right.
sent1 -> int8: if the overshoe is a ascomycete then it is not clonic and/or ensconces.; sent5 -> int9: if the overshoe is an overwork then it is a pleurisy.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the overshoe is not clonic and/or ensconces is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not clonic and/or it ensconces if it is a kind of a ascomycete. sent2: the carcinogen is an overwork and/or darts bisexual if there is something such that it is not a pleurisy. sent3: that the zinfandel is inadmissible is correct. sent4: everything is inadmissible and it does not guarantee. sent5: if something overworks then it is a pleurisy. sent6: everything is inadmissible. sent7: the overshoe crazes if the fact that the carcinogen does overwork is not incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the zinfandel is not a ascomycete is true the monad is not a pleurisy. sent9: if something crazes then it does not ensconce. sent10: if the overshoe does guarantee then it does ensconce. sent11: the overshoe is a craze if the carcinogen does dart bisexual. sent12: the overshoe does not ensconce if it is a craze. sent13: if something that is inadmissible is not a kind of a guarantee it is not a ascomycete. sent14: there is something such that it is a pleurisy. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the zinfandel is both inadmissible and not a guarantee.; sent13 -> int2: the zinfandel is not a ascomycete if it is inadmissible and it is not a guarantee.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the zinfandel is not a kind of a ascomycete.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the monad is not a kind of a pleurisy.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a pleurisy.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the carcinogen either does overwork or does dart bisexual or both.; int6 & sent7 & sent11 -> int7: the overshoe is a craze.; __UNKNOWN__