the parallax is a depravity.
sent1: the headcheese is not a Pickford if that either it is not a ladder or it does emulsify snub or both is not correct. sent2: if the tenpin is a kind of inadequate a hare the parallax is not a depravity. sent3: if either the tenpin is valid or it is immunodeficient or both it is not a shoddy. sent4: something is xenogeneic but it is not a hare if it is not a Pickford. sent5: the fact that the tenpin is a shoddy but it is not immunodeficient does not hold if that the deserts is not inadequate is not incorrect. sent6: if something is valid and/or is not Luxembourgian then it is a depravity. sent7: the tenpin is valid if it is not Luxembourgian. sent8: the deserts is not inadequate if the conventioneer is xenogeneic and is not a hare. sent9: if the tenpin is not immunodeficient then the fact that the parallax is not Luxembourgian but invalid is not right. sent10: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Pickford hold either the conventioneer is not monomorphemic or it is not a Pickford or both. sent11: if there exists something such that that it emulsifies snub and it is not xenogeneic is not right the tenpin is xenogeneic. sent12: the fact that something is not a Pickford is right if it either is not monomorphemic or is not a Pickford or both. sent13: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a depravity the parallax is xenogeneic. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it emulsifies snub and it is not xenogeneic does not hold. sent15: the tenpin is legal if it is rustless. sent16: a Luxembourgian thing is inadequate. sent17: the tenpin is a hare. sent18: if the tenpin is xenogeneic then it is a shoddy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the tenpin is not Luxembourgian hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the tenpin is valid.; int1 -> int2: the tenpin is either valid or immunodeficient or both.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the tenpin is not a kind of a shoddy.; sent14 & sent11 -> int4: the tenpin is xenogeneic.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the tenpin is a shoddy.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the tenpin is Luxembourgian.; sent16 -> int8: that the tenpin is inadequate is true if it is Luxembourgian.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the tenpin is inadequate.; int9 & sent17 -> int10: the tenpin is a kind of inadequate a hare.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the parallax is a kind of a shoddy.
$hypothesis$ = the parallax is a depravity. ; $context$ = sent1: the headcheese is not a Pickford if that either it is not a ladder or it does emulsify snub or both is not correct. sent2: if the tenpin is a kind of inadequate a hare the parallax is not a depravity. sent3: if either the tenpin is valid or it is immunodeficient or both it is not a shoddy. sent4: something is xenogeneic but it is not a hare if it is not a Pickford. sent5: the fact that the tenpin is a shoddy but it is not immunodeficient does not hold if that the deserts is not inadequate is not incorrect. sent6: if something is valid and/or is not Luxembourgian then it is a depravity. sent7: the tenpin is valid if it is not Luxembourgian. sent8: the deserts is not inadequate if the conventioneer is xenogeneic and is not a hare. sent9: if the tenpin is not immunodeficient then the fact that the parallax is not Luxembourgian but invalid is not right. sent10: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Pickford hold either the conventioneer is not monomorphemic or it is not a Pickford or both. sent11: if there exists something such that that it emulsifies snub and it is not xenogeneic is not right the tenpin is xenogeneic. sent12: the fact that something is not a Pickford is right if it either is not monomorphemic or is not a Pickford or both. sent13: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a depravity the parallax is xenogeneic. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it emulsifies snub and it is not xenogeneic does not hold. sent15: the tenpin is legal if it is rustless. sent16: a Luxembourgian thing is inadequate. sent17: the tenpin is a hare. sent18: if the tenpin is xenogeneic then it is a shoddy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the tenpin is not Luxembourgian hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the tenpin is valid.; int1 -> int2: the tenpin is either valid or immunodeficient or both.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the tenpin is not a kind of a shoddy.; sent14 & sent11 -> int4: the tenpin is xenogeneic.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the tenpin is a shoddy.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the tenpin is Luxembourgian.; sent16 -> int8: that the tenpin is inadequate is true if it is Luxembourgian.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the tenpin is inadequate.; int9 & sent17 -> int10: the tenpin is a kind of inadequate a hare.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__