the podocarp is not a hustler but a Appenzeller.
sent1: the fact that the podocarp is a monosemy hold if something resents attendant. sent2: the fact that the podocarp is a hustler and is a kind of a Appenzeller is not correct if it does not overbear entrepot. sent3: the attendant is not seismological. sent4: something does overbear leprosy if it is seismological and resents printer. sent5: that something is a hustler and it is a Appenzeller does not hold if it does not overbear entrepot. sent6: the podocarp is Croatian and is a monosemy if something does resent attendant. sent7: the podocarp is a kind of a monosemy. sent8: if something that does parallel goblet overbears entrepot then the fact that it is not a Croatian is not false. sent9: everything is not seismological and does resent printer. sent10: if a non-seismological thing does resent printer then it does overbear leprosy. sent11: everything is not seismological. sent12: if the attendant overbears leprosy then the podocarp does parallel goblet. sent13: that the podocarp is a hustler and it is a Appenzeller is incorrect. sent14: if something does not overbear entrepot the fact that it is not a hustler and is a Appenzeller is false. sent15: if the attendant is a kind of seismological thing that does resent printer then it does overbear leprosy. sent16: something does resent attendant.
sent9 -> int1: the attendant is not seismological but it resents printer.; sent10 -> int2: the attendant overbears leprosy if it is not seismological and resents printer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the attendant overbears leprosy.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the podocarp parallels goblet.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the podocarp overbears entrepot.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the podocarp does parallel goblet and does overbear entrepot.; sent8 -> int6: if the podocarp parallels goblet and it overbears entrepot then it is not a Croatian.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the podocarp is not a Croatian.; sent16 & sent6 -> int8: the podocarp is a kind of a Croatian and is a kind of a monosemy.; int8 -> int9: the podocarp is a kind of a Croatian.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the podocarp does not overbear entrepot.; sent14 -> int12: that the podocarp is both not a hustler and a Appenzeller does not hold if it does not overbear entrepot.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the podocarp is not a hustler but a Appenzeller. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the podocarp is a monosemy hold if something resents attendant. sent2: the fact that the podocarp is a hustler and is a kind of a Appenzeller is not correct if it does not overbear entrepot. sent3: the attendant is not seismological. sent4: something does overbear leprosy if it is seismological and resents printer. sent5: that something is a hustler and it is a Appenzeller does not hold if it does not overbear entrepot. sent6: the podocarp is Croatian and is a monosemy if something does resent attendant. sent7: the podocarp is a kind of a monosemy. sent8: if something that does parallel goblet overbears entrepot then the fact that it is not a Croatian is not false. sent9: everything is not seismological and does resent printer. sent10: if a non-seismological thing does resent printer then it does overbear leprosy. sent11: everything is not seismological. sent12: if the attendant overbears leprosy then the podocarp does parallel goblet. sent13: that the podocarp is a hustler and it is a Appenzeller is incorrect. sent14: if something does not overbear entrepot the fact that it is not a hustler and is a Appenzeller is false. sent15: if the attendant is a kind of seismological thing that does resent printer then it does overbear leprosy. sent16: something does resent attendant. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the attendant is not seismological but it resents printer.; sent10 -> int2: the attendant overbears leprosy if it is not seismological and resents printer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the attendant overbears leprosy.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the podocarp parallels goblet.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the podocarp overbears entrepot.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the podocarp does parallel goblet and does overbear entrepot.; sent8 -> int6: if the podocarp parallels goblet and it overbears entrepot then it is not a Croatian.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the podocarp is not a Croatian.; sent16 & sent6 -> int8: the podocarp is a kind of a Croatian and is a kind of a monosemy.; int8 -> int9: the podocarp is a kind of a Croatian.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the podocarp does not overbear entrepot.; sent14 -> int12: that the podocarp is both not a hustler and a Appenzeller does not hold if it does not overbear entrepot.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__