the peeper is ungual.
sent1: something is a Castroism if it commingles. sent2: that there exists something such that it does segregate tolu is correct. sent3: the go-kart does not brisk if it does commingle and it is a kind of a Castroism. sent4: if something is not non-aromatic then it is ungual. sent5: the fact that the Domino is a wreath and it embowers bitumen is false. sent6: something exhilarates percept if the fact that it is not a wreath and it does embower bitumen does not hold. sent7: if the Domino is a wreath then the fact that it exhilarates percept is correct. sent8: something is a kind of a wreath that does embower bitumen. sent9: if the Tutsi embowers Domino then it commingles. sent10: the fact that that that the Domino does not exhilarate percept but it is a Castroism is not incorrect is wrong is not wrong. sent11: there exists something such that it does not commingle and brisks. sent12: if the Tutsi embowers Domino the peeper is aromatic. sent13: if the mitogen is aromatic then the Tutsi embowers Domino but it does not brisk. sent14: there is something such that it does brisk. sent15: if the Domino exhilarates percept then the fact that the Tutsi does embower Domino hold. sent16: if the mitogen is a kind of a Castroism then it is aromatic. sent17: there exists something such that it is a wreath and it is a Castroism. sent18: something does not brisk. sent19: the Domino is not a wreath and is ungual. sent20: the mitogen commingles if that the Dictaphone is a one-dimensionality is right. sent21: something does exhilarate percept if it is a wreath. sent22: the go-kart does not commingle and is a Castroism. sent23: the Domino is impermanent. sent24: if something does not brisk then that the fact that the go-kart is a kind of ungual thing that does not exhilarate percept hold is wrong. sent25: if something is not a wreath and embowers bitumen the go-kart does brisk.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Domino is not a wreath and does embower bitumen.; assump1 -> int1: something is not a wreath and does embower bitumen.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the go-kart does brisk.; sent6 -> int3: the Domino does exhilarate percept if the fact that it is not a kind of a wreath and it does embower bitumen does not hold.; sent4 -> int4: the peeper is ungual if it is aromatic.;
the peeper is not ungual.
sent1 -> int5: if that the mitogen does commingle is not false that it is not a Castroism does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the peeper is ungual. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Castroism if it commingles. sent2: that there exists something such that it does segregate tolu is correct. sent3: the go-kart does not brisk if it does commingle and it is a kind of a Castroism. sent4: if something is not non-aromatic then it is ungual. sent5: the fact that the Domino is a wreath and it embowers bitumen is false. sent6: something exhilarates percept if the fact that it is not a wreath and it does embower bitumen does not hold. sent7: if the Domino is a wreath then the fact that it exhilarates percept is correct. sent8: something is a kind of a wreath that does embower bitumen. sent9: if the Tutsi embowers Domino then it commingles. sent10: the fact that that that the Domino does not exhilarate percept but it is a Castroism is not incorrect is wrong is not wrong. sent11: there exists something such that it does not commingle and brisks. sent12: if the Tutsi embowers Domino the peeper is aromatic. sent13: if the mitogen is aromatic then the Tutsi embowers Domino but it does not brisk. sent14: there is something such that it does brisk. sent15: if the Domino exhilarates percept then the fact that the Tutsi does embower Domino hold. sent16: if the mitogen is a kind of a Castroism then it is aromatic. sent17: there exists something such that it is a wreath and it is a Castroism. sent18: something does not brisk. sent19: the Domino is not a wreath and is ungual. sent20: the mitogen commingles if that the Dictaphone is a one-dimensionality is right. sent21: something does exhilarate percept if it is a wreath. sent22: the go-kart does not commingle and is a Castroism. sent23: the Domino is impermanent. sent24: if something does not brisk then that the fact that the go-kart is a kind of ungual thing that does not exhilarate percept hold is wrong. sent25: if something is not a wreath and embowers bitumen the go-kart does brisk. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Domino is not a wreath and does embower bitumen.; assump1 -> int1: something is not a wreath and does embower bitumen.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the go-kart does brisk.; sent6 -> int3: the Domino does exhilarate percept if the fact that it is not a kind of a wreath and it does embower bitumen does not hold.; sent4 -> int4: the peeper is ungual if it is aromatic.; __UNKNOWN__