that the dullness and the essentialness happens is not true.
sent1: if that the federalizing Jewbush and the southernness occurs is wrong then that the federalizing Jewbush does not occur is correct. sent2: the encircling absconder does not occur if the fact that both the encircling absconder and the regimentalness happens is incorrect. sent3: that the admiralty occurs is prevented by that both the linguisticsness and the cleanliness happens. sent4: the linguisticsness happens if the Babel occurs. sent5: the Babel occurs. sent6: that the admiralty does not occur and the federalizing phytohormone does not occur prevents the non-dullness. sent7: the essentialness happens. sent8: if the grasslessness does not occur that the fact that both the encircling absconder and the regimentalness happens is not wrong is not correct. sent9: the fact that the dullness happens and the essentialness happens is not true if that the Babel does not occur hold. sent10: the cleanliness and the non-southernness occurs. sent11: the federalizing phytohormone does not occur and the federalizing Jewbush does not occur. sent12: that the federalizing Jewbush happens and the southernness happens does not hold if the encircling absconder does not occur.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the linguisticsness occurs.; sent10 -> int2: the cleanliness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the linguisticsness and the cleanliness happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the admiralty does not occur.; sent11 -> int5: the fact that the federalizing phytohormone does not occur is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the admiralty does not occur and the federalizing phytohormone does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the dullness happens.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the dullness and the essentialness happens is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = that the dullness and the essentialness happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the federalizing Jewbush and the southernness occurs is wrong then that the federalizing Jewbush does not occur is correct. sent2: the encircling absconder does not occur if the fact that both the encircling absconder and the regimentalness happens is incorrect. sent3: that the admiralty occurs is prevented by that both the linguisticsness and the cleanliness happens. sent4: the linguisticsness happens if the Babel occurs. sent5: the Babel occurs. sent6: that the admiralty does not occur and the federalizing phytohormone does not occur prevents the non-dullness. sent7: the essentialness happens. sent8: if the grasslessness does not occur that the fact that both the encircling absconder and the regimentalness happens is not wrong is not correct. sent9: the fact that the dullness happens and the essentialness happens is not true if that the Babel does not occur hold. sent10: the cleanliness and the non-southernness occurs. sent11: the federalizing phytohormone does not occur and the federalizing Jewbush does not occur. sent12: that the federalizing Jewbush happens and the southernness happens does not hold if the encircling absconder does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the linguisticsness occurs.; sent10 -> int2: the cleanliness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the linguisticsness and the cleanliness happens.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the admiralty does not occur.; sent11 -> int5: the fact that the federalizing phytohormone does not occur is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the admiralty does not occur and the federalizing phytohormone does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the dullness happens.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__