that something does not urticate octahedron and is an adventure is not correct.
sent1: that the lateen is not an adventure and sticks subpoena is incorrect. sent2: the Mahdist incriminates Goth. sent3: if the fact that the Mahdist is not hydrometric and is a kind of a soteriology is not right it does not incriminate Goth. sent4: the Mahdist is a kind of an adventure. sent5: the fact that the Mahdist is an adventure and it does urticate mastectomy is not incorrect. sent6: the EPROM incriminates Goth. sent7: something does urticate octahedron and is an adventure. sent8: the Mahdist is a kind of a vicariate that incriminates Goth. sent9: there exists something such that it is a kind of an adventure. sent10: the Mahdist is not a vicariate if that it does not urticate octahedron and it is an adventure does not hold. sent11: something does not urticate octahedron. sent12: the Mahdist is not a kind of a vicariate if it is not an adventure. sent13: the fact that the Mahdist does not incriminate Goth but it is Gregorian is wrong. sent14: the Mahdist is unwoven and it riddles Mahdist.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Mahdist does not urticate octahedron but it is a kind of an adventure is wrong.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Mahdist is not a vicariate.; sent8 -> int2: the Mahdist is a vicariate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Mahdist does not urticate octahedron but it is an adventure.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that something does not urticate octahedron and is an adventure is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lateen is not an adventure and sticks subpoena is incorrect. sent2: the Mahdist incriminates Goth. sent3: if the fact that the Mahdist is not hydrometric and is a kind of a soteriology is not right it does not incriminate Goth. sent4: the Mahdist is a kind of an adventure. sent5: the fact that the Mahdist is an adventure and it does urticate mastectomy is not incorrect. sent6: the EPROM incriminates Goth. sent7: something does urticate octahedron and is an adventure. sent8: the Mahdist is a kind of a vicariate that incriminates Goth. sent9: there exists something such that it is a kind of an adventure. sent10: the Mahdist is not a vicariate if that it does not urticate octahedron and it is an adventure does not hold. sent11: something does not urticate octahedron. sent12: the Mahdist is not a kind of a vicariate if it is not an adventure. sent13: the fact that the Mahdist does not incriminate Goth but it is Gregorian is wrong. sent14: the Mahdist is unwoven and it riddles Mahdist. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Mahdist does not urticate octahedron but it is a kind of an adventure is wrong.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Mahdist is not a vicariate.; sent8 -> int2: the Mahdist is a vicariate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Mahdist does not urticate octahedron but it is an adventure.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__