the Rambouillet is not an agnostic and/or it is not conjugal.
sent1: if the outrigger is year-round and it is a contrast then the sylvite does not deaminate beldam. sent2: the Rambouillet is a Vanderbilt and a bell. sent3: if the fact that something is lax and is not a oscitancy does not hold then it is a kind of a oscitancy. sent4: the outrigger tunnels wold and does contrast. sent5: if either the pullback is not a kind of an anthrax or it is a kind of a oscitancy or both then the outrigger is a wristlet. sent6: if something is not an anthrax the fact that it is not an agnostic and/or it is not conjugal does not hold. sent7: if there is something such that that it does not tunnel pullback and is not a palliation does not hold then the pullback is not an anthrax. sent8: if something is a kind of a oscitancy then it is an anthrax. sent9: the outrigger is lax if the fact that it is a kind of a wristlet is correct. sent10: the fact that something is lax but not a oscitancy does not hold if it is a wristlet. sent11: that the Rambouillet does not deaminate beldam is right. sent12: something is year-round if it does deaminate Amphiumidae. sent13: if the outrigger is lax it does deaminate Amphiumidae. sent14: if something is an anthrax the till does deaminate Amphiumidae and is a Asheville. sent15: the Rambouillet is not an agnostic or it is conjugal or both. sent16: if the sylvite does not deaminate beldam the Rambouillet either is not a kind of an agnostic or is not conjugal or both.
sent12 -> int1: the outrigger is year-round if it does deaminate Amphiumidae.; sent4 -> int2: the outrigger is a contrast.;
that the Rambouillet is either not an agnostic or not conjugal or both does not hold.
sent6 -> int3: if the Rambouillet is not an anthrax then that it is not a kind of an agnostic and/or it is not conjugal is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the Rambouillet is not an agnostic and/or it is not conjugal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the outrigger is year-round and it is a contrast then the sylvite does not deaminate beldam. sent2: the Rambouillet is a Vanderbilt and a bell. sent3: if the fact that something is lax and is not a oscitancy does not hold then it is a kind of a oscitancy. sent4: the outrigger tunnels wold and does contrast. sent5: if either the pullback is not a kind of an anthrax or it is a kind of a oscitancy or both then the outrigger is a wristlet. sent6: if something is not an anthrax the fact that it is not an agnostic and/or it is not conjugal does not hold. sent7: if there is something such that that it does not tunnel pullback and is not a palliation does not hold then the pullback is not an anthrax. sent8: if something is a kind of a oscitancy then it is an anthrax. sent9: the outrigger is lax if the fact that it is a kind of a wristlet is correct. sent10: the fact that something is lax but not a oscitancy does not hold if it is a wristlet. sent11: that the Rambouillet does not deaminate beldam is right. sent12: something is year-round if it does deaminate Amphiumidae. sent13: if the outrigger is lax it does deaminate Amphiumidae. sent14: if something is an anthrax the till does deaminate Amphiumidae and is a Asheville. sent15: the Rambouillet is not an agnostic or it is conjugal or both. sent16: if the sylvite does not deaminate beldam the Rambouillet either is not a kind of an agnostic or is not conjugal or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the outrigger is year-round if it does deaminate Amphiumidae.; sent4 -> int2: the outrigger is a contrast.; __UNKNOWN__