the conspirator is nonpsychoactive.
sent1: if the fact that the fact that something is reputable but not nonpsychoactive is right does not hold then it is Moravian. sent2: if something does not snooker blighted then it is disreputable. sent3: if the conspirator flies then the fact that the cellulose is not a flies and is not disreputable does not hold. sent4: if the meat is not cautious then the fact that the ornamental is Moravian and not a glycerite is incorrect. sent5: that the cellulose is not Moravian and/or is a glycerite is wrong. sent6: the meat is not cautious if it is not full-term and it does not disentangle seasnail. sent7: if something is a kind of a glycerite then it snookers blighted. sent8: that the conspirator is not disreputable and it is not a flies is not right if the cellulose is not disreputable. sent9: if the conspirator is not psychoactive the fact that the cellulose is not psychoactive and it is not a flies does not hold. sent10: the fact that the conspirator is not a kind of a glycerite and it is psychoactive is not correct if the cellulose is a kind of a glycerite. sent11: if the fact that something is not an association and is acquisitive is not correct it disentangles Wanamaker. sent12: that something is not cautious and it is not Moravian is wrong if it is full-term. sent13: if the ornamental is not nonpsychoactive and/or is disreputable then the coney is not nonpsychoactive. sent14: the polymath does not snooker blighted. sent15: the cellulose does not strengthen Lagodon. sent16: something either is not nonpsychoactive or is disreputable or both if it does not fly. sent17: the fact that the lull is either not nonpsychoactive or time-release or both is not true if the conspirator is not a flies. sent18: the meat is not full-term and it does not disentangle seasnail. sent19: if that the fact that something is both Moravian and not a glycerite hold is not true then it is not a kind of a flies. sent20: the ornamental is full-term thing that disentangles seasnail. sent21: something is nonpsychoactive if that it is not disreputable and is not a flies is not correct. sent22: the fact that the conspirator is both not disreputable and non-Moravian does not hold. sent23: if that the cellulose is not Moravian or it is a kind of a glycerite or both is false it does not snooker blighted. sent24: if the ornamental snookers blighted that the coney flies but it is not disreputable does not hold. sent25: if there is something such that that it is a flies and is not disreputable is not correct then the conspirator is not a flies.
sent2 -> int1: if the cellulose does not snooker blighted it is disreputable.; sent23 & sent5 -> int2: the cellulose does not snooker blighted.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cellulose is disreputable.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the conspirator is not disreputable and it does not fly is wrong.; sent21 -> int5: if that the conspirator is not disreputable and it is not a flies is not correct then it is nonpsychoactive.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the conspirator is not nonpsychoactive.
sent16 -> int6: if the fact that the ornamental does not fly is not incorrect it is not nonpsychoactive and/or it is disreputable.; sent19 -> int7: if that the ornamental is Moravian thing that is not a glycerite is false it does not fly.; sent6 & sent18 -> int8: the meat is not cautious.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the ornamental is Moravian but it is not a kind of a glycerite is not true.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the ornamental is not a flies.; int6 & int10 -> int11: either the ornamental is not nonpsychoactive or it is disreputable or both.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the coney is not nonpsychoactive.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is not nonpsychoactive.;
$hypothesis$ = the conspirator is nonpsychoactive. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the fact that something is reputable but not nonpsychoactive is right does not hold then it is Moravian. sent2: if something does not snooker blighted then it is disreputable. sent3: if the conspirator flies then the fact that the cellulose is not a flies and is not disreputable does not hold. sent4: if the meat is not cautious then the fact that the ornamental is Moravian and not a glycerite is incorrect. sent5: that the cellulose is not Moravian and/or is a glycerite is wrong. sent6: the meat is not cautious if it is not full-term and it does not disentangle seasnail. sent7: if something is a kind of a glycerite then it snookers blighted. sent8: that the conspirator is not disreputable and it is not a flies is not right if the cellulose is not disreputable. sent9: if the conspirator is not psychoactive the fact that the cellulose is not psychoactive and it is not a flies does not hold. sent10: the fact that the conspirator is not a kind of a glycerite and it is psychoactive is not correct if the cellulose is a kind of a glycerite. sent11: if the fact that something is not an association and is acquisitive is not correct it disentangles Wanamaker. sent12: that something is not cautious and it is not Moravian is wrong if it is full-term. sent13: if the ornamental is not nonpsychoactive and/or is disreputable then the coney is not nonpsychoactive. sent14: the polymath does not snooker blighted. sent15: the cellulose does not strengthen Lagodon. sent16: something either is not nonpsychoactive or is disreputable or both if it does not fly. sent17: the fact that the lull is either not nonpsychoactive or time-release or both is not true if the conspirator is not a flies. sent18: the meat is not full-term and it does not disentangle seasnail. sent19: if that the fact that something is both Moravian and not a glycerite hold is not true then it is not a kind of a flies. sent20: the ornamental is full-term thing that disentangles seasnail. sent21: something is nonpsychoactive if that it is not disreputable and is not a flies is not correct. sent22: the fact that the conspirator is both not disreputable and non-Moravian does not hold. sent23: if that the cellulose is not Moravian or it is a kind of a glycerite or both is false it does not snooker blighted. sent24: if the ornamental snookers blighted that the coney flies but it is not disreputable does not hold. sent25: if there is something such that that it is a flies and is not disreputable is not correct then the conspirator is not a flies. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the cellulose does not snooker blighted it is disreputable.; sent23 & sent5 -> int2: the cellulose does not snooker blighted.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cellulose is disreputable.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the conspirator is not disreputable and it does not fly is wrong.; sent21 -> int5: if that the conspirator is not disreputable and it is not a flies is not correct then it is nonpsychoactive.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__