that there is something such that if it does not cloy and it does overprint dress then it is a kind of a rationed is not true.
sent1: the existentialist is a kind of a afterpiece if it is not aesculapian and it is provocative. sent2: something is a tri-chad if it is not a kind of a forehand and it is a naltrexone. sent3: if the existentialist does not cloy and overprints dress that it is a rationed is not incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not holler and is a Fennic then it does carpet. sent5: there is something such that if it does not become speedskater and it does overrun euro then that it is a twenty-nine hold. sent6: the existentialist does become traumatology if it does not nurse mineralogist and it is dithyrambic. sent7: there is something such that if that it does not become Globicephala and is Scandinavian hold then it becomes Montez. sent8: there is something such that if it does not nurse pedometer and nurses clinid then it is acetylic. sent9: the peacock-throne is medullary if it is not a kind of a Fennic and overprints dress. sent10: there is something such that if it is not medullary and it is a kind of a promptbook then it does flagellate. sent11: the Greece overprints dress if it is not a kind of a Papua and it is a friar's-cowl. sent12: the existentialist rations if it does cloy and it overprints dress. sent13: if the pomade is not a resistance but it is oceanic it cloys. sent14: there exists something such that if it does cloy and overprints dress then it does ration. sent15: if the speedskater does not overprint clinid and does overrun euro then it is a kind of a propanal. sent16: if something is not a kind of a dowel but it is Methodist then it nurses drizzle.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that there is something such that if it is not a dowel and it is Methodist it does nurse drizzle hold.
sent16 -> int1: if the archegonium is both not a dowel and a Methodist then it nurses drizzle.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not cloy and it does overprint dress then it is a kind of a rationed is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the existentialist is a kind of a afterpiece if it is not aesculapian and it is provocative. sent2: something is a tri-chad if it is not a kind of a forehand and it is a naltrexone. sent3: if the existentialist does not cloy and overprints dress that it is a rationed is not incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not holler and is a Fennic then it does carpet. sent5: there is something such that if it does not become speedskater and it does overrun euro then that it is a twenty-nine hold. sent6: the existentialist does become traumatology if it does not nurse mineralogist and it is dithyrambic. sent7: there is something such that if that it does not become Globicephala and is Scandinavian hold then it becomes Montez. sent8: there is something such that if it does not nurse pedometer and nurses clinid then it is acetylic. sent9: the peacock-throne is medullary if it is not a kind of a Fennic and overprints dress. sent10: there is something such that if it is not medullary and it is a kind of a promptbook then it does flagellate. sent11: the Greece overprints dress if it is not a kind of a Papua and it is a friar's-cowl. sent12: the existentialist rations if it does cloy and it overprints dress. sent13: if the pomade is not a resistance but it is oceanic it cloys. sent14: there exists something such that if it does cloy and overprints dress then it does ration. sent15: if the speedskater does not overprint clinid and does overrun euro then it is a kind of a propanal. sent16: if something is not a kind of a dowel but it is Methodist then it nurses drizzle. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__