that not the part-timeness but the justice happens is caused by the bigness.
sent1: the tonsorialness happens if the bigness happens. sent2: that the exegeticness happens is not incorrect. sent3: if that the bigness does not occur is right then the snap happens. sent4: the blossoming does not occur and the systolicness does not occur if the Nigerian happens. sent5: if the blossoming does not occur the navigation occurs and the wrapping thumbnail occurs. sent6: that the tirade happens brings about that not the Andeanness but the abandonment happens. sent7: the navigation happens. sent8: the wrapping Chytridiaceae happens. sent9: that the tonsorialness occurs and the anticlinalness does not occur is caused by the bigness. sent10: that the wrapping undercoat but not the hungering prolamine occurs prevents the primateship. sent11: the Zolaesqueness occurs. sent12: the tonsorialness happens. sent13: both the wrapping thumbnail and the navigation happens. sent14: that both the tonsorialness and the non-anticlinalness happens leads to the non-part-timeness. sent15: that the womanhood happens is prevented by that the sacrificing but not the raging crescent occurs. sent16: if the psycholinguisticsness happens the exegeticness happens. sent17: that the aid does not occur and the evanescing happens is brought about by that the overbearing happens. sent18: the hungering flutter leads to that the constructing butterwort and the nonassociativeness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bigness occurs is right.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: both the tonsorialness and the non-anticlinalness happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the part-timeness does not occur.; sent13 -> int3: the wrapping thumbnail occurs.;
the snapping occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that not the part-timeness but the justice happens is caused by the bigness. ; $context$ = sent1: the tonsorialness happens if the bigness happens. sent2: that the exegeticness happens is not incorrect. sent3: if that the bigness does not occur is right then the snap happens. sent4: the blossoming does not occur and the systolicness does not occur if the Nigerian happens. sent5: if the blossoming does not occur the navigation occurs and the wrapping thumbnail occurs. sent6: that the tirade happens brings about that not the Andeanness but the abandonment happens. sent7: the navigation happens. sent8: the wrapping Chytridiaceae happens. sent9: that the tonsorialness occurs and the anticlinalness does not occur is caused by the bigness. sent10: that the wrapping undercoat but not the hungering prolamine occurs prevents the primateship. sent11: the Zolaesqueness occurs. sent12: the tonsorialness happens. sent13: both the wrapping thumbnail and the navigation happens. sent14: that both the tonsorialness and the non-anticlinalness happens leads to the non-part-timeness. sent15: that the womanhood happens is prevented by that the sacrificing but not the raging crescent occurs. sent16: if the psycholinguisticsness happens the exegeticness happens. sent17: that the aid does not occur and the evanescing happens is brought about by that the overbearing happens. sent18: the hungering flutter leads to that the constructing butterwort and the nonassociativeness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bigness occurs is right.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: both the tonsorialness and the non-anticlinalness happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the part-timeness does not occur.; sent13 -> int3: the wrapping thumbnail occurs.; __UNKNOWN__