the fact that that the tibia does not eviscerate bioflavinoid and is a bang hold is wrong.
sent1: that the fact that the declension is not episcopal and it is not a electroplater does not hold is not false. sent2: the convolvulus is both skinless and not a yeast. sent3: that the anxiolytic does not stage doyenne but it is Albigensian is incorrect if the hummer is not a kind of a brave. sent4: the fact that the convolvulus is skinless hold. sent5: if the declension is not a relay then that the anxiolytic is not a bang and it is not Albigensian does not hold. sent6: the tibia is a folly but it is not episcopal. sent7: if something that is episcopal is not a kind of a relay the tibia does not eviscerate bioflavinoid. sent8: if that the anxiolytic does not eviscerate bioflavinoid but it is a relay is not right then it is not a relay. sent9: the hummer is skinless. sent10: the declension is not a kind of a yeast. sent11: the anxiolytic is not a kind of a electroplater if it is skinless. sent12: the tibia is a folly. sent13: if the anxiolytic is not a bang that it does not eviscerate bioflavinoid and relays does not hold. sent14: that the anxiolytic is not a bang is correct. sent15: there is something such that it is a kind of a brave. sent16: the fact that the anxiolytic is a electroplater hold. sent17: that something does not eviscerate bioflavinoid but it is a bang is false if it is not a brave. sent18: if the declension is not skinless that the anxiolytic is both not Albigensian and a relay is wrong. sent19: the kingpin does not fry instinct if the convolvulus is skinless but it is not a yeast. sent20: the anxiolytic does not stage doyenne but it is Albigensian if it is a electroplater. sent21: if that the hummer is a brave is not wrong the declension is episcopal. sent22: that the collaborator is not a Costanoan and it is not a kind of a relay is not right if the kingpin does not fry instinct. sent23: the fact that the tibia does not fry instinct but it does stage doyenne is not correct if the fact that the kingpin does not eviscerate bioflavinoid hold. sent24: the declension does not relay if that the collaborator is not a kind of a Costanoan and it is not a relay does not hold. sent25: the tibia does bang and is a kind of a folly.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hummer is not a brave.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the anxiolytic does not stage doyenne and is not non-Albigensian is not right.; sent20 & sent16 -> int2: the anxiolytic does not stage doyenne and is Albigensian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the hummer is a brave is not wrong.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: that the declension is episcopal hold.; sent19 & sent2 -> int6: the kingpin does not fry instinct.; sent22 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the collaborator is not a kind of a Costanoan and it does not relay does not hold.; sent24 & int7 -> int8: the declension is not a relay.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the declension is episcopal and not a relay.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is episcopal and is not a relay.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the tibia does not eviscerate bioflavinoid.; sent25 -> int12: the tibia bangs.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tibia does not eviscerate bioflavinoid but it is a kind of a bang does not hold.
sent17 -> int13: that the tibia does not eviscerate bioflavinoid but it is a bang is incorrect if it is not a kind of a brave.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the tibia does not eviscerate bioflavinoid and is a bang hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the declension is not episcopal and it is not a electroplater does not hold is not false. sent2: the convolvulus is both skinless and not a yeast. sent3: that the anxiolytic does not stage doyenne but it is Albigensian is incorrect if the hummer is not a kind of a brave. sent4: the fact that the convolvulus is skinless hold. sent5: if the declension is not a relay then that the anxiolytic is not a bang and it is not Albigensian does not hold. sent6: the tibia is a folly but it is not episcopal. sent7: if something that is episcopal is not a kind of a relay the tibia does not eviscerate bioflavinoid. sent8: if that the anxiolytic does not eviscerate bioflavinoid but it is a relay is not right then it is not a relay. sent9: the hummer is skinless. sent10: the declension is not a kind of a yeast. sent11: the anxiolytic is not a kind of a electroplater if it is skinless. sent12: the tibia is a folly. sent13: if the anxiolytic is not a bang that it does not eviscerate bioflavinoid and relays does not hold. sent14: that the anxiolytic is not a bang is correct. sent15: there is something such that it is a kind of a brave. sent16: the fact that the anxiolytic is a electroplater hold. sent17: that something does not eviscerate bioflavinoid but it is a bang is false if it is not a brave. sent18: if the declension is not skinless that the anxiolytic is both not Albigensian and a relay is wrong. sent19: the kingpin does not fry instinct if the convolvulus is skinless but it is not a yeast. sent20: the anxiolytic does not stage doyenne but it is Albigensian if it is a electroplater. sent21: if that the hummer is a brave is not wrong the declension is episcopal. sent22: that the collaborator is not a Costanoan and it is not a kind of a relay is not right if the kingpin does not fry instinct. sent23: the fact that the tibia does not fry instinct but it does stage doyenne is not correct if the fact that the kingpin does not eviscerate bioflavinoid hold. sent24: the declension does not relay if that the collaborator is not a kind of a Costanoan and it is not a relay does not hold. sent25: the tibia does bang and is a kind of a folly. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hummer is not a brave.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the anxiolytic does not stage doyenne and is not non-Albigensian is not right.; sent20 & sent16 -> int2: the anxiolytic does not stage doyenne and is Albigensian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the hummer is a brave is not wrong.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: that the declension is episcopal hold.; sent19 & sent2 -> int6: the kingpin does not fry instinct.; sent22 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the collaborator is not a kind of a Costanoan and it does not relay does not hold.; sent24 & int7 -> int8: the declension is not a relay.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the declension is episcopal and not a relay.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is episcopal and is not a relay.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the tibia does not eviscerate bioflavinoid.; sent25 -> int12: the tibia bangs.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__