the non-unmanageableness is prevented by that the directingness occurs.
sent1: the Hawaiian does not occur if the fact that the difference but not the pyroelectricness happens does not hold. sent2: the difference happens. sent3: the Hawaiianness occurs. sent4: the session occurs. sent5: if both the session and the directing happens the overtness does not occur. sent6: if the auxeticness occurs then the fact that the difference but not the pyroelectricness happens is not right. sent7: if the lamplight does not occur and the shooting does not occur the suspending kunzite happens. sent8: either the Hawaiian occurs or the metamorphosing occurs or both. sent9: that the directingness does not occur causes that both the half and the session happens. sent10: that the unmanageableness happens is triggered by that the metamorphosing does not occur and the overtness does not occur. sent11: that the counterdemonstration happens and the interpreting happens causes the non-neuroglialness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the directingness happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: both the session and the directingness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the overtness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the Hawaiian occurs or the metamorphosing does not occur or both.;
the half occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the non-unmanageableness is prevented by that the directingness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the Hawaiian does not occur if the fact that the difference but not the pyroelectricness happens does not hold. sent2: the difference happens. sent3: the Hawaiianness occurs. sent4: the session occurs. sent5: if both the session and the directing happens the overtness does not occur. sent6: if the auxeticness occurs then the fact that the difference but not the pyroelectricness happens is not right. sent7: if the lamplight does not occur and the shooting does not occur the suspending kunzite happens. sent8: either the Hawaiian occurs or the metamorphosing occurs or both. sent9: that the directingness does not occur causes that both the half and the session happens. sent10: that the unmanageableness happens is triggered by that the metamorphosing does not occur and the overtness does not occur. sent11: that the counterdemonstration happens and the interpreting happens causes the non-neuroglialness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the directingness happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: both the session and the directingness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the overtness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the Hawaiian occurs or the metamorphosing does not occur or both.; __UNKNOWN__