the bodybuilder either does clank or is not an aspen or both.
sent1: something is not an immanence if the fact that it is not a antiquark and/or it does besiege buckwheat is false. sent2: the peppermint does not destain and it is not semiotic. sent3: the fact that the DP is not unattractive but it is a harmattan is wrong. sent4: that the peppermint is not a kind of a harmattan and/or it does destain does not hold. sent5: the buttermilk does not prop bigheaded. sent6: the buttermilk destains and is not a antiquark if it does not prop bigheaded. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not unattractive but a harmattan the buttermilk does not besiege buckwheat. sent8: the peppermint is not a kind of an aspen. sent9: if the fact that the columbite-tantalite is a antiquark and/or besieges buckwheat does not hold it is not an immanence. sent10: that something is an immanence is correct if it does not moor Linaceae and it is semiotic. sent11: that the bodybuilder does clank and/or it is not an aspen is not right if the DP does besiege buckwheat. sent12: the DP is illicit if the fact that it is not unattractive and is not a kind of a harmattan is not correct. sent13: that the columbite-tantalite is not a antiquark or does besiege buckwheat or both is not right if the buttermilk does not besiege buckwheat. sent14: there is something such that it is unattractive and it is not a kind of a harmattan. sent15: if the fact that the buttermilk does not clank and/or it does besiege buckwheat is not correct that it is not a kind of an aspen is correct. sent16: the bodybuilder clanks and/or is an aspen if something is not an immanence. sent17: the DP is not illicit if the peppermint does not destain and it is not semiotic. sent18: the columbite-tantalite is a antiquark. sent19: something is not a kind of an aspen if that it is not a harmattan or it is illicit or both does not hold. sent20: the buttermilk does not besiege buckwheat if something is not unattractive and it is not a kind of a harmattan. sent21: if the buttermilk is not a antiquark and is an immanence the DP is not a antiquark. sent22: there exists something such that it is an immanence. sent23: if the DP is a harmattan it is illicit. sent24: the DP does not clank if the fact that the bodybuilder does not clank is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the DP is attractive but not a harmattan is not true.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the DP is illicit.; sent17 & sent2 -> int2: the DP is not illicit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the DP is not unattractive and not a harmattan.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is a kind of attractive thing that is not a harmattan.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the buttermilk does not besiege buckwheat.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the columbite-tantalite is not a antiquark or it does besiege buckwheat or both does not hold.; sent1 -> int8: the columbite-tantalite is not a kind of an immanence if that either it is not a antiquark or it besieges buckwheat or both is not correct.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the columbite-tantalite is not a kind of an immanence.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not an immanence.;
the fact that the bodybuilder does clank or is not a kind of an aspen or both is incorrect.
sent6 & sent5 -> int11: the buttermilk does destain but it is not a kind of a antiquark.; int11 -> int12: that the buttermilk is not a antiquark is true.; sent10 -> int13: the buttermilk is an immanence if it does not moor Linaceae and it is semiotic.;
$hypothesis$ = the bodybuilder either does clank or is not an aspen or both. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not an immanence if the fact that it is not a antiquark and/or it does besiege buckwheat is false. sent2: the peppermint does not destain and it is not semiotic. sent3: the fact that the DP is not unattractive but it is a harmattan is wrong. sent4: that the peppermint is not a kind of a harmattan and/or it does destain does not hold. sent5: the buttermilk does not prop bigheaded. sent6: the buttermilk destains and is not a antiquark if it does not prop bigheaded. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not unattractive but a harmattan the buttermilk does not besiege buckwheat. sent8: the peppermint is not a kind of an aspen. sent9: if the fact that the columbite-tantalite is a antiquark and/or besieges buckwheat does not hold it is not an immanence. sent10: that something is an immanence is correct if it does not moor Linaceae and it is semiotic. sent11: that the bodybuilder does clank and/or it is not an aspen is not right if the DP does besiege buckwheat. sent12: the DP is illicit if the fact that it is not unattractive and is not a kind of a harmattan is not correct. sent13: that the columbite-tantalite is not a antiquark or does besiege buckwheat or both is not right if the buttermilk does not besiege buckwheat. sent14: there is something such that it is unattractive and it is not a kind of a harmattan. sent15: if the fact that the buttermilk does not clank and/or it does besiege buckwheat is not correct that it is not a kind of an aspen is correct. sent16: the bodybuilder clanks and/or is an aspen if something is not an immanence. sent17: the DP is not illicit if the peppermint does not destain and it is not semiotic. sent18: the columbite-tantalite is a antiquark. sent19: something is not a kind of an aspen if that it is not a harmattan or it is illicit or both does not hold. sent20: the buttermilk does not besiege buckwheat if something is not unattractive and it is not a kind of a harmattan. sent21: if the buttermilk is not a antiquark and is an immanence the DP is not a antiquark. sent22: there exists something such that it is an immanence. sent23: if the DP is a harmattan it is illicit. sent24: the DP does not clank if the fact that the bodybuilder does not clank is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the DP is attractive but not a harmattan is not true.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the DP is illicit.; sent17 & sent2 -> int2: the DP is not illicit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the DP is not unattractive and not a harmattan.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is a kind of attractive thing that is not a harmattan.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the buttermilk does not besiege buckwheat.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the columbite-tantalite is not a antiquark or it does besiege buckwheat or both does not hold.; sent1 -> int8: the columbite-tantalite is not a kind of an immanence if that either it is not a antiquark or it besieges buckwheat or both is not correct.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the columbite-tantalite is not a kind of an immanence.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not an immanence.; __UNKNOWN__