that there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-cretaceous thing that does miscarry Arauca does not hold the fact that it does not stale hornbill hold is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of non-cretaceous thing that miscarries Arauca is false then it does not stale hornbill. sent2: if the fact that something is not a turbulence and is a kind of a scatter is not correct then it is not noninheritable. sent3: the rootstock does not stale hornbill if it is not cretaceous and it does miscarry Arauca. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a African and does stale novation is false it is a Aztecan. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not fine-tune and it is a raffia does not hold it is a kapuka. sent6: the rootstock is not penicillin-resistant if it does not stale hornbill. sent7: there exists something such that if it is cretaceous it does not stale hornbill. sent8: there exists something such that if that it pegs and it does stale weeknight does not hold it is not a canaliculus. sent9: if the fact that something does not smash grille but it is advisable is false then it is not insubordinate. sent10: if the fact that the rootstock does not stale hornbill and does decouple is not right then it is not a criterion. sent11: the rootstock does not stale hornbill if that it is cretaceous and miscarries Arauca is wrong.
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the rootstock is not cretaceous but it miscarries Arauca is not correct it does not stale hornbill.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-cretaceous thing that does miscarry Arauca does not hold the fact that it does not stale hornbill hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of non-cretaceous thing that miscarries Arauca is false then it does not stale hornbill. sent2: if the fact that something is not a turbulence and is a kind of a scatter is not correct then it is not noninheritable. sent3: the rootstock does not stale hornbill if it is not cretaceous and it does miscarry Arauca. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a African and does stale novation is false it is a Aztecan. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not fine-tune and it is a raffia does not hold it is a kapuka. sent6: the rootstock is not penicillin-resistant if it does not stale hornbill. sent7: there exists something such that if it is cretaceous it does not stale hornbill. sent8: there exists something such that if that it pegs and it does stale weeknight does not hold it is not a canaliculus. sent9: if the fact that something does not smash grille but it is advisable is false then it is not insubordinate. sent10: if the fact that the rootstock does not stale hornbill and does decouple is not right then it is not a criterion. sent11: the rootstock does not stale hornbill if that it is cretaceous and miscarries Arauca is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the rootstock is not cretaceous but it miscarries Arauca is not correct it does not stale hornbill.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__