the fact that both the enfranchisement and the revelation occurs is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the airmailing does not occur is not incorrect if the adhering leverage does not occur and the adhering lactifuge does not occur. sent2: if that the fact that the flank does not occur or the film occurs or both is true does not hold the proconsulship happens. sent3: that the revelation occurs is brought about by that the appearing does not occur but the reding da'wah occurs. sent4: the majorsness occurs if the coughing does not occur but the reding triteness occurs. sent5: the fretting Vietnam occurs or the recission does not occur or both. sent6: the shooing Chiroptera and the enfranchisement occurs. sent7: that the appearing does not occur is caused by that the splashdown occurs. sent8: if the adhering lactifuge does not occur the airmailing does not occur. sent9: the adhering lactifuge does not occur. sent10: if the bow-wow happens the digesting happens. sent11: that the digest does not occur is prevented by that the bow-wow happens and/or the mystification does not occur. sent12: that the digesting and/or the splashdown happens yields that the appearing does not occur. sent13: the airmailing does not occur. sent14: the shooing Chiroptera occurs. sent15: the bow-wow happens or the mystification does not occur or both if the recursion happens. sent16: that the adhering leverage does not occur and the adhering lactifuge does not occur is brought about by the proconsulship. sent17: the splashdown does not occur if the fact that the splashdown and the appearing occurs is wrong. sent18: the recursion occurs. sent19: the reding da'wah but not the airmail occurs if the adhering lactifuge does not occur. sent20: the digesting occurs but the recursion does not occur if the splashdown happens. sent21: if the recursion does not occur then the fact that the enfranchisement occurs and the revelation occurs is false.
sent15 & sent18 -> int1: the bow-wow happens and/or the mystification does not occur.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the digest happens.; int2 -> int3: the digest and/or the splashdown occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the appearing does not occur.; sent19 & sent9 -> int5: the reding da'wah but not the airmailing occurs.; int5 -> int6: the reding da'wah happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the appearing does not occur and the reding da'wah occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the revelation occurs.; sent6 -> int9: the fact that the enfranchisement occurs hold.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the enfranchisement happens and the revelation happens is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the enfranchisement and the revelation occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the airmailing does not occur is not incorrect if the adhering leverage does not occur and the adhering lactifuge does not occur. sent2: if that the fact that the flank does not occur or the film occurs or both is true does not hold the proconsulship happens. sent3: that the revelation occurs is brought about by that the appearing does not occur but the reding da'wah occurs. sent4: the majorsness occurs if the coughing does not occur but the reding triteness occurs. sent5: the fretting Vietnam occurs or the recission does not occur or both. sent6: the shooing Chiroptera and the enfranchisement occurs. sent7: that the appearing does not occur is caused by that the splashdown occurs. sent8: if the adhering lactifuge does not occur the airmailing does not occur. sent9: the adhering lactifuge does not occur. sent10: if the bow-wow happens the digesting happens. sent11: that the digest does not occur is prevented by that the bow-wow happens and/or the mystification does not occur. sent12: that the digesting and/or the splashdown happens yields that the appearing does not occur. sent13: the airmailing does not occur. sent14: the shooing Chiroptera occurs. sent15: the bow-wow happens or the mystification does not occur or both if the recursion happens. sent16: that the adhering leverage does not occur and the adhering lactifuge does not occur is brought about by the proconsulship. sent17: the splashdown does not occur if the fact that the splashdown and the appearing occurs is wrong. sent18: the recursion occurs. sent19: the reding da'wah but not the airmail occurs if the adhering lactifuge does not occur. sent20: the digesting occurs but the recursion does not occur if the splashdown happens. sent21: if the recursion does not occur then the fact that the enfranchisement occurs and the revelation occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent18 -> int1: the bow-wow happens and/or the mystification does not occur.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the digest happens.; int2 -> int3: the digest and/or the splashdown occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the appearing does not occur.; sent19 & sent9 -> int5: the reding da'wah but not the airmailing occurs.; int5 -> int6: the reding da'wah happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the appearing does not occur and the reding da'wah occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the revelation occurs.; sent6 -> int9: the fact that the enfranchisement occurs hold.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__