the AMP prioritizes.
sent1: the cetrimide coffins NIPR. sent2: there exists something such that it is solanaceous. sent3: the AMP is a kind of a sisal if the Micronor is achondritic. sent4: if there is something such that it is a sanctimoniousness the cetrimide is eager thing that is solanaceous. sent5: if that the Micronor coffins NIPR and is not accommodational is not right that it is not non-achondritic is not incorrect. sent6: the sequencer is solanaceous. sent7: there exists something such that it does annoy. sent8: the nutter is a sanctimoniousness. sent9: the puncture is uneager. sent10: that the Micronor does coffin NIPR and is not accommodational is not true. sent11: if there is something such that it does prioritize and it is a sisal then the cetrimide is not eager. sent12: that the Micronor is not solanaceous is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the Micronor is achondritic is true if that it is accommodational is not false. sent14: if the fact that something is not a sanctimoniousness and cleaves wireless is incorrect then it is a sanctimoniousness. sent15: the cetrimide prioritizes. sent16: the AMP does prioritize if that the Micronor is not a sisal but it is achondritic is not true. sent17: if something is a sanctimoniousness then that it is both not eager and solanaceous is not right. sent18: the fact that something is both not a sisal and achondritic is not right if it is not eager.
sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the Micronor is achondritic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the AMP is a sisal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the AMP does prioritize.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the AMP does prioritize and is a kind of a sisal.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does prioritize and is a sisal.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the fact that the cetrimide is not eager hold.; sent8 -> int6: something is a sanctimoniousness.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the cetrimide is eager and solanaceous.; int7 -> int8: the cetrimide is eager.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the AMP does prioritize.
sent18 -> int10: if that the Micronor is not eager is not false then the fact that it is not a sisal and is achondritic is not correct.; sent17 -> int11: if the cetrimide is a sanctimoniousness then the fact that it is both uneager and not non-solanaceous is incorrect.; sent14 -> int12: if the fact that the cetrimide is not a sanctimoniousness and does cleave wireless is wrong then it is a kind of a sanctimoniousness.;
$hypothesis$ = the AMP prioritizes. ; $context$ = sent1: the cetrimide coffins NIPR. sent2: there exists something such that it is solanaceous. sent3: the AMP is a kind of a sisal if the Micronor is achondritic. sent4: if there is something such that it is a sanctimoniousness the cetrimide is eager thing that is solanaceous. sent5: if that the Micronor coffins NIPR and is not accommodational is not right that it is not non-achondritic is not incorrect. sent6: the sequencer is solanaceous. sent7: there exists something such that it does annoy. sent8: the nutter is a sanctimoniousness. sent9: the puncture is uneager. sent10: that the Micronor does coffin NIPR and is not accommodational is not true. sent11: if there is something such that it does prioritize and it is a sisal then the cetrimide is not eager. sent12: that the Micronor is not solanaceous is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the Micronor is achondritic is true if that it is accommodational is not false. sent14: if the fact that something is not a sanctimoniousness and cleaves wireless is incorrect then it is a sanctimoniousness. sent15: the cetrimide prioritizes. sent16: the AMP does prioritize if that the Micronor is not a sisal but it is achondritic is not true. sent17: if something is a sanctimoniousness then that it is both not eager and solanaceous is not right. sent18: the fact that something is both not a sisal and achondritic is not right if it is not eager. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the Micronor is achondritic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the AMP is a sisal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the AMP does prioritize.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the AMP does prioritize and is a kind of a sisal.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does prioritize and is a sisal.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the fact that the cetrimide is not eager hold.; sent8 -> int6: something is a sanctimoniousness.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the cetrimide is eager and solanaceous.; int7 -> int8: the cetrimide is eager.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__