the fact that either the blockage does not communicate necromancer or it is not logistics or both is incorrect.
sent1: if the Negress is an originality then the fact that the cyproheptadine is not a Vesey and is marital is incorrect. sent2: something is a kind of a Vesey if it is marital. sent3: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Vesey the cyproheptadine does not communicate necromancer or it is not imperfect or both. sent4: if that the Negress is a four-in-hand and is not a cowfish is not correct it is an originality. sent5: the neoliberal is an originality. sent6: if the blockage is an irrelevance then it communicates lockage. sent7: something is a kind of an irrelevance if the fact that either it does not communicate necromancer or it is not logistics or both is false. sent8: either the cyproheptadine is not logistics or it is imperfect or both if there is something such that it is marital. sent9: if the cyproheptadine is imperfect then the Negress is marital. sent10: the Negress does communicate megakaryocyte. sent11: the Negress is imperfect and is not an irrelevance if there is something such that it is marital. sent12: the Negress is not an originality and/or it is not a Vesey if there exists something such that it is a four-in-hand. sent13: if the Negress is not a kind of an originality and/or it is not a kind of a Vesey then that it is not a Vesey is not incorrect. sent14: the cancer is marital if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Vesey that is a kind of an originality is not correct. sent15: the fact that either the loosestrife is not logistics or it is not a kind of an adultery or both is not correct. sent16: the blockage does communicate necromancer. sent17: the Negress is an irrelevance if the fact that the blockage is marital is correct. sent18: the fact that the storyteller is a Vesey and is an originality is not true. sent19: if the fact that something is not an originality and/or is not marital is incorrect it does communicate necromancer. sent20: the Negress does communicate necromancer and/or it is not an originality. sent21: if the fact that something either does not communicate lockage or is not an irrelevance or both is incorrect then it is an originality. sent22: the blockage is not marital and/or is not an irrelevance. sent23: there exists something such that it is a four-in-hand. sent24: the desert sprays comb-out. sent25: the cyproheptadine is imperfect if that the blockage communicates lockage hold.
sent7 -> int1: if that either the blockage does not communicate necromancer or it is not logistics or both is not true it is an irrelevance.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blockage does not communicate necromancer and/or it is not logistics is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the blockage is a kind of an irrelevance.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the blockage communicates lockage.; int3 & sent25 -> int4: that the cyproheptadine is imperfect is true.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the Negress is marital.; sent2 -> int6: the Negress is a Vesey if it is marital.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Negress is a kind of a Vesey.; sent23 & sent12 -> int8: the Negress is not an originality and/or it is not a kind of a Vesey.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the Negress is not a Vesey.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the blockage does not communicate necromancer or it is not logistics or both is false.
sent18 -> int11: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Vesey that is an originality is not correct.; int11 & sent14 -> int12: the cancer is marital.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is marital.; int13 & sent11 -> int14: the Negress is imperfect and is not an irrelevance.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it is imperfect and it is not an irrelevance.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the blockage does not communicate necromancer or it is not logistics or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Negress is an originality then the fact that the cyproheptadine is not a Vesey and is marital is incorrect. sent2: something is a kind of a Vesey if it is marital. sent3: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Vesey the cyproheptadine does not communicate necromancer or it is not imperfect or both. sent4: if that the Negress is a four-in-hand and is not a cowfish is not correct it is an originality. sent5: the neoliberal is an originality. sent6: if the blockage is an irrelevance then it communicates lockage. sent7: something is a kind of an irrelevance if the fact that either it does not communicate necromancer or it is not logistics or both is false. sent8: either the cyproheptadine is not logistics or it is imperfect or both if there is something such that it is marital. sent9: if the cyproheptadine is imperfect then the Negress is marital. sent10: the Negress does communicate megakaryocyte. sent11: the Negress is imperfect and is not an irrelevance if there is something such that it is marital. sent12: the Negress is not an originality and/or it is not a Vesey if there exists something such that it is a four-in-hand. sent13: if the Negress is not a kind of an originality and/or it is not a kind of a Vesey then that it is not a Vesey is not incorrect. sent14: the cancer is marital if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Vesey that is a kind of an originality is not correct. sent15: the fact that either the loosestrife is not logistics or it is not a kind of an adultery or both is not correct. sent16: the blockage does communicate necromancer. sent17: the Negress is an irrelevance if the fact that the blockage is marital is correct. sent18: the fact that the storyteller is a Vesey and is an originality is not true. sent19: if the fact that something is not an originality and/or is not marital is incorrect it does communicate necromancer. sent20: the Negress does communicate necromancer and/or it is not an originality. sent21: if the fact that something either does not communicate lockage or is not an irrelevance or both is incorrect then it is an originality. sent22: the blockage is not marital and/or is not an irrelevance. sent23: there exists something such that it is a four-in-hand. sent24: the desert sprays comb-out. sent25: the cyproheptadine is imperfect if that the blockage communicates lockage hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if that either the blockage does not communicate necromancer or it is not logistics or both is not true it is an irrelevance.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blockage does not communicate necromancer and/or it is not logistics is not correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the blockage is a kind of an irrelevance.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the blockage communicates lockage.; int3 & sent25 -> int4: that the cyproheptadine is imperfect is true.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the Negress is marital.; sent2 -> int6: the Negress is a Vesey if it is marital.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Negress is a kind of a Vesey.; sent23 & sent12 -> int8: the Negress is not an originality and/or it is not a kind of a Vesey.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the Negress is not a Vesey.; int7 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__