that if the tumblebug perceives aleurone the adduct is a release is false.
sent1: that the groundhog is a Hoover and is not a turnery is not correct. sent2: that if the tumblebug is not a implicitness then that the groundhog is not a Hoover and is not a turnery does not hold is not wrong. sent3: if the groundhog is not a turnery the fact that the tumblebug does not release and is not a implicitness does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a release is right. sent5: if the tumblebug is not a implicitness then that the groundhog is not a kind of a Hoover but it is a turnery is not right. sent6: that the alp is a implicitness and is a Laocoon hold. sent7: there exists something such that it does not perceive Riesman. sent8: the groundhog is sepulchral. sent9: that the groundhog is a kind of a Hoover but it is not a kind of a turnery is not true if the fact that the tumblebug is not a kind of a implicitness is not false. sent10: the groundhog is a release. sent11: the fact that the adduct releases is not incorrect if that the groundhog is not a Hoover and not a turnery does not hold. sent12: the fact that the groundhog is not a kind of a Hoover and is a turnery does not hold. sent13: if the groundhog perceives aleurone and it is a kind of a Hoover then it is not a implicitness. sent14: the writer is not a turnery. sent15: if something is a turnery and is a implicitness then it is not a Hoover. sent16: the simulation does not perceive aleurone. sent17: there exists something such that it does perceive Riesman. sent18: the tumblebug releases if there is something such that it does not perceive aleurone. sent19: if something that is a kind of a Halloween does perceive aleurone it is not a implicitness. sent20: the groundhog perceives aleurone. sent21: the groundhog is predictable thing that exalts toolmaker. sent22: if that the groundhog is both not a turnery and not a implicitness is not correct then the tumblebug is a kind of a Hoover. sent23: if the tumblebug is a Halloween and is a turnery then it does not perceive aleurone. sent24: if something does not perceive Riesman then the fact that the tumblebug is a Halloween hold.
sent7 & sent24 -> int1: the tumblebug is a kind of a Halloween.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tumblebug does perceive aleurone.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tumblebug is a Halloween and it does perceive aleurone.; sent19 -> int3: if the tumblebug is a kind of a Halloween that perceives aleurone it is not a implicitness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the tumblebug is not a implicitness.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the groundhog is not a Hoover and it is not a turnery does not hold.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the adduct is a release.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the tumblebug perceives aleurone the adduct is a release is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the groundhog is a Hoover and is not a turnery is not correct. sent2: that if the tumblebug is not a implicitness then that the groundhog is not a Hoover and is not a turnery does not hold is not wrong. sent3: if the groundhog is not a turnery the fact that the tumblebug does not release and is not a implicitness does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a release is right. sent5: if the tumblebug is not a implicitness then that the groundhog is not a kind of a Hoover but it is a turnery is not right. sent6: that the alp is a implicitness and is a Laocoon hold. sent7: there exists something such that it does not perceive Riesman. sent8: the groundhog is sepulchral. sent9: that the groundhog is a kind of a Hoover but it is not a kind of a turnery is not true if the fact that the tumblebug is not a kind of a implicitness is not false. sent10: the groundhog is a release. sent11: the fact that the adduct releases is not incorrect if that the groundhog is not a Hoover and not a turnery does not hold. sent12: the fact that the groundhog is not a kind of a Hoover and is a turnery does not hold. sent13: if the groundhog perceives aleurone and it is a kind of a Hoover then it is not a implicitness. sent14: the writer is not a turnery. sent15: if something is a turnery and is a implicitness then it is not a Hoover. sent16: the simulation does not perceive aleurone. sent17: there exists something such that it does perceive Riesman. sent18: the tumblebug releases if there is something such that it does not perceive aleurone. sent19: if something that is a kind of a Halloween does perceive aleurone it is not a implicitness. sent20: the groundhog perceives aleurone. sent21: the groundhog is predictable thing that exalts toolmaker. sent22: if that the groundhog is both not a turnery and not a implicitness is not correct then the tumblebug is a kind of a Hoover. sent23: if the tumblebug is a Halloween and is a turnery then it does not perceive aleurone. sent24: if something does not perceive Riesman then the fact that the tumblebug is a Halloween hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent24 -> int1: the tumblebug is a kind of a Halloween.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tumblebug does perceive aleurone.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tumblebug is a Halloween and it does perceive aleurone.; sent19 -> int3: if the tumblebug is a kind of a Halloween that perceives aleurone it is not a implicitness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the tumblebug is not a implicitness.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the groundhog is not a Hoover and it is not a turnery does not hold.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the adduct is a release.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__