there is something such that if it does not numerate haggle then the fact that it fields theanthropism and/or it does not field tune-up does not hold.
sent1: if the gust does not numerate haggle it does field tune-up. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is not vascular hold that it is an affirmative and/or is not unreverberant does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a bell then the fact that it is inconsolable and/or it is not indirect is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the gust fields theanthropism or does not field tune-up or both is wrong if it numerates haggle. sent5: there exists something such that if that it does numerate haggle is right then the fact that it either does field theanthropism or does not field tune-up or both is wrong. sent6: the fact that the gust is an autographed and/or does not bar Allentown does not hold if it is not cinerary. sent7: if the gust does not date the fact that either it is a kind of a cynicism or it is not pistillate or both does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it does not numerate haggle then that it does not field theanthropism is correct. sent9: that the decorator is a quoter or it does not underquote or both is incorrect if it is not a anisogamy. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not numerate haggle the fact that it either does field theanthropism or fields tune-up or both is wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it does not numerate haggle it fields tune-up. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a fatigability then that it is a genotype and/or it is not anestrous does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a rest-cure then that either it is a kind of a preseason or it does not grapple or both is wrong. sent14: if something is not a son-in-law then the fact that it does field changer and/or it does not field tune-up does not hold. sent15: that the gust does field theanthropism and/or it does not field tune-up is not correct if it does not numerate haggle. sent16: if the gust does not numerate haggle it either fields theanthropism or does not field tune-up or both. sent17: there exists something such that if it does not numerate haggle it fields theanthropism and/or it does not field tune-up.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
if the changer is not a kind of a son-in-law that it does field changer and/or it does not field tune-up is incorrect.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not numerate haggle then the fact that it fields theanthropism and/or it does not field tune-up does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gust does not numerate haggle it does field tune-up. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is not vascular hold that it is an affirmative and/or is not unreverberant does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a bell then the fact that it is inconsolable and/or it is not indirect is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the gust fields theanthropism or does not field tune-up or both is wrong if it numerates haggle. sent5: there exists something such that if that it does numerate haggle is right then the fact that it either does field theanthropism or does not field tune-up or both is wrong. sent6: the fact that the gust is an autographed and/or does not bar Allentown does not hold if it is not cinerary. sent7: if the gust does not date the fact that either it is a kind of a cynicism or it is not pistillate or both does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it does not numerate haggle then that it does not field theanthropism is correct. sent9: that the decorator is a quoter or it does not underquote or both is incorrect if it is not a anisogamy. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not numerate haggle the fact that it either does field theanthropism or fields tune-up or both is wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it does not numerate haggle it fields tune-up. sent12: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a fatigability then that it is a genotype and/or it is not anestrous does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a rest-cure then that either it is a kind of a preseason or it does not grapple or both is wrong. sent14: if something is not a son-in-law then the fact that it does field changer and/or it does not field tune-up does not hold. sent15: that the gust does field theanthropism and/or it does not field tune-up is not correct if it does not numerate haggle. sent16: if the gust does not numerate haggle it either fields theanthropism or does not field tune-up or both. sent17: there exists something such that if it does not numerate haggle it fields theanthropism and/or it does not field tune-up. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__