the fact that there exists something such that that it is not an adjunct and it is not sericultural does not hold does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the gadgetry does deduce and is not sericultural is wrong. sent2: that the pheasant's-eye is a vouchee is right if the zootoxin is a hypoparathyroidism. sent3: the gadgetry deduces if the zootoxin is sericultural. sent4: the pheasant's-eye is a hypoparathyroidism. sent5: if there are crucial things then the zootoxin deduces and is a hypoparathyroidism. sent6: something is crucial. sent7: that the gadgetry is a kind of a vouchee is true if there exists something such that it is a kind of an adjunct. sent8: if that the pheasant's-eye is a vouchee is not wrong then that the gadgetry is not a kind of an adjunct and it is not sericultural is not true. sent9: that the gadgetry does not deduce and it is not a kind of a hypoparathyroidism is incorrect if the zootoxin is sericultural. sent10: the fact that the zootoxin is a kind of an adjunct but it is not a kind of a hypoparathyroidism does not hold if the gadgetry is sericultural. sent11: the Hmong deduces.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the zootoxin deduces and it is a kind of a hypoparathyroidism.; int1 -> int2: the zootoxin is a hypoparathyroidism.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the pheasant's-eye is a vouchee.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the gadgetry is not an adjunct and it is not sericultural is wrong.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it is not an adjunct and it is not sericultural does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gadgetry does deduce and is not sericultural is wrong. sent2: that the pheasant's-eye is a vouchee is right if the zootoxin is a hypoparathyroidism. sent3: the gadgetry deduces if the zootoxin is sericultural. sent4: the pheasant's-eye is a hypoparathyroidism. sent5: if there are crucial things then the zootoxin deduces and is a hypoparathyroidism. sent6: something is crucial. sent7: that the gadgetry is a kind of a vouchee is true if there exists something such that it is a kind of an adjunct. sent8: if that the pheasant's-eye is a vouchee is not wrong then that the gadgetry is not a kind of an adjunct and it is not sericultural is not true. sent9: that the gadgetry does not deduce and it is not a kind of a hypoparathyroidism is incorrect if the zootoxin is sericultural. sent10: the fact that the zootoxin is a kind of an adjunct but it is not a kind of a hypoparathyroidism does not hold if the gadgetry is sericultural. sent11: the Hmong deduces. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the zootoxin deduces and it is a kind of a hypoparathyroidism.; int1 -> int2: the zootoxin is a hypoparathyroidism.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the pheasant's-eye is a vouchee.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the gadgetry is not an adjunct and it is not sericultural is wrong.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__