the fact that that either the cretonne does not breakfast or it does not feed outgrowth or both is correct does not hold.
sent1: if something is not a bloodguilt it does not scoff embroiderer and it does not peregrinate. sent2: if something is not a kind of a bloodguilt then it does not scoff embroiderer. sent3: the outgrowth does not scoff embroiderer. sent4: something is a kind of a caster if it is a bloodguilt. sent5: the cretonne is not a kind of a breakfast or it does not feed outgrowth or both if the outgrowth is a hipbone. sent6: if the outgrowth is a caster the cretonne is a bloodguilt and/or does not feed outgrowth. sent7: the fact that the cretonne is not a kind of a caster and does not feed outgrowth does not hold if the Scotch is a bloodguilt. sent8: the outgrowth is a breakfast. sent9: the cretonne does peregrinate. sent10: the outgrowth does breakfast and/or is not a kind of a hipbone. sent11: the outgrowth is a hipbone if it is a caster. sent12: either the cretonne is a kind of a breakfast or it is not a caster or both if the outgrowth is a kind of a hipbone. sent13: the cretonne scoffs embroiderer. sent14: if the outgrowth feeds outgrowth then the cretonne is not a bloodguilt and/or it does not breakfast. sent15: the fact that that the cretonne does not scoff hypotensive and it is not a hipbone is not false is incorrect. sent16: the appliance is a hipbone. sent17: that the outgrowth does feed outgrowth but it is not a kind of a caster is incorrect. sent18: if the cretonne peregrinates it is a mammoth. sent19: the outgrowth is not a caster and/or it does not winkle. sent20: if the outgrowth feeds outgrowth then it is a kind of a hipbone. sent21: the outgrowth is a numen. sent22: that the outgrowth does not scoff embroiderer and it does not peregrinate is false. sent23: if that something is a caster that is non-conjugal is not correct then it is not a caster.
sent1 -> int1: the outgrowth does not scoff embroiderer and it does not peregrinate if it is not a bloodguilt.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the outgrowth is not a bloodguilt.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the outgrowth does not scoff embroiderer and does not peregrinate.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the outgrowth is a bloodguilt.; sent4 -> int5: the outgrowth is a kind of a caster if it is a bloodguilt.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the outgrowth is a caster hold.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the outgrowth is a hipbone.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that either the cretonne is not a kind of a breakfast or it does not feed outgrowth or both is not true.
sent23 -> int8: if that the cretonne is a caster but not conjugal is false then it is not a caster.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that either the cretonne does not breakfast or it does not feed outgrowth or both is correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a bloodguilt it does not scoff embroiderer and it does not peregrinate. sent2: if something is not a kind of a bloodguilt then it does not scoff embroiderer. sent3: the outgrowth does not scoff embroiderer. sent4: something is a kind of a caster if it is a bloodguilt. sent5: the cretonne is not a kind of a breakfast or it does not feed outgrowth or both if the outgrowth is a hipbone. sent6: if the outgrowth is a caster the cretonne is a bloodguilt and/or does not feed outgrowth. sent7: the fact that the cretonne is not a kind of a caster and does not feed outgrowth does not hold if the Scotch is a bloodguilt. sent8: the outgrowth is a breakfast. sent9: the cretonne does peregrinate. sent10: the outgrowth does breakfast and/or is not a kind of a hipbone. sent11: the outgrowth is a hipbone if it is a caster. sent12: either the cretonne is a kind of a breakfast or it is not a caster or both if the outgrowth is a kind of a hipbone. sent13: the cretonne scoffs embroiderer. sent14: if the outgrowth feeds outgrowth then the cretonne is not a bloodguilt and/or it does not breakfast. sent15: the fact that that the cretonne does not scoff hypotensive and it is not a hipbone is not false is incorrect. sent16: the appliance is a hipbone. sent17: that the outgrowth does feed outgrowth but it is not a kind of a caster is incorrect. sent18: if the cretonne peregrinates it is a mammoth. sent19: the outgrowth is not a caster and/or it does not winkle. sent20: if the outgrowth feeds outgrowth then it is a kind of a hipbone. sent21: the outgrowth is a numen. sent22: that the outgrowth does not scoff embroiderer and it does not peregrinate is false. sent23: if that something is a caster that is non-conjugal is not correct then it is not a caster. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the outgrowth does not scoff embroiderer and it does not peregrinate if it is not a bloodguilt.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the outgrowth is not a bloodguilt.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the outgrowth does not scoff embroiderer and does not peregrinate.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the outgrowth is a bloodguilt.; sent4 -> int5: the outgrowth is a kind of a caster if it is a bloodguilt.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the outgrowth is a caster hold.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the outgrowth is a hipbone.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__