if the LASIK happens that the protectorship does not occur or the hyping contradictoriness happens or both does not hold.
sent1: if that the veneering does not occur is not wrong that the inserting Landau does not occur and/or the inserting chauffeur occurs is not right. sent2: if the Maltese does not occur then that either the protectorship does not occur or the hyping contradictoriness happens or both is incorrect. sent3: the hyping bohemianism occurs. sent4: if the hyping queasiness occurs the LASIK does not occur. sent5: if the Malteseness occurs and/or the hyping queasiness happens then the LASIK does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Malteseness happens.; assump2 -> int1: either the Maltese or the hyping queasiness or both occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the LASIK does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the LASIK occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Maltese does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that either the protectorship does not occur or the hyping contradictoriness happens or both is not true.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the LASIK happens that the protectorship does not occur or the hyping contradictoriness happens or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the veneering does not occur is not wrong that the inserting Landau does not occur and/or the inserting chauffeur occurs is not right. sent2: if the Maltese does not occur then that either the protectorship does not occur or the hyping contradictoriness happens or both is incorrect. sent3: the hyping bohemianism occurs. sent4: if the hyping queasiness occurs the LASIK does not occur. sent5: if the Malteseness occurs and/or the hyping queasiness happens then the LASIK does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Malteseness happens.; assump2 -> int1: either the Maltese or the hyping queasiness or both occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the LASIK does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the LASIK occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Maltese does not occur.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that either the protectorship does not occur or the hyping contradictoriness happens or both is not true.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__