the fact that the misanthrope contemns Brancusi is not false.
sent1: if the fact that the rockrose does contemn globulin but it is not androgenic is not correct the misanthrope does not contemn Brancusi. sent2: something that is a kind of a ape-man is not mediate. sent3: if the fact that the rockrose is not non-androgenic is right the misanthrope does not contemn Brancusi. sent4: that the antibacterial is not ataxic hold. sent5: if the fact that something does not set but it is a pointsman is not right it is not a pointsman. sent6: the weatherman is a kind of a pointsman if the rockrose is a counterculture. sent7: something does mediate if the fact that it does set is right. sent8: the weatherman is a pointsman but it is not a counterculture if the rockrose is a counterculture. sent9: the antibacterial is not an avalanche or is androgenic or both. sent10: the rockrose is not a ape-man but it is a kind of a counterculture if the weatherman is not a kind of a pointsman. sent11: the antibacterial does contemn globulin if either it is not ataxic or it does contemn Brancusi or both. sent12: the antibacterial is a ape-man if the weatherman is a pointsman but it is not a counterculture. sent13: the antibacterial either is progestational or avalanches or both. sent14: if the weatherman is androgenic then the fact that it is not a pointsman is true. sent15: that the rockrose does contemn globulin and it is androgenic does not hold. sent16: the rockrose is not androgenic. sent17: the rockrose is a counterculture if it does contemn globulin. sent18: if that the antibacterial is not progestational is right then it is a set. sent19: the fact that the antibacterial is not a kind of a counterculture is not incorrect if it is mediate. sent20: the rockrose is a counterculture if it is an avalanche. sent21: the antibacterial sets if either it is not progestational or it avalanches or both. sent22: the antibacterial is not progestational and/or it is a kind of an avalanche if it is not ataxic. sent23: the misanthrope is ataxic. sent24: if the rockrose is mediate the antibacterial is a kind of a counterculture that does not mediate. sent25: the weatherman is a pointsman. sent26: if something is not a ape-man but it is a kind of a counterculture then it is androgenic. sent27: the antibacterial is progestational and/or it is an avalanche if it is not ataxic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rockrose does contemn globulin but it is not androgenic.; assump1 -> int1: the rockrose does contemn globulin.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the rockrose is a counterculture.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the weatherman is a kind of a pointsman that is not a counterculture.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the antibacterial is a kind of a ape-man.; sent2 -> int5: the antibacterial does not mediate if it is a ape-man.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antibacterial does not mediate.; sent7 -> int7: if the antibacterial is a kind of a set it does mediate.; sent22 & sent4 -> int8: the antibacterial is non-progestational and/or is a kind of an avalanche.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the antibacterial sets.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the antibacterial mediates.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: that the rockrose does contemn globulin but it is not androgenic is wrong.; int12 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the misanthrope does contemn Brancusi.
sent26 -> int13: the rockrose is androgenic if it is not a ape-man and is a counterculture.; sent5 -> int14: if the fact that the fact that the weatherman is both not a set and a pointsman is not false does not hold it is not a pointsman.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the misanthrope contemns Brancusi is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the rockrose does contemn globulin but it is not androgenic is not correct the misanthrope does not contemn Brancusi. sent2: something that is a kind of a ape-man is not mediate. sent3: if the fact that the rockrose is not non-androgenic is right the misanthrope does not contemn Brancusi. sent4: that the antibacterial is not ataxic hold. sent5: if the fact that something does not set but it is a pointsman is not right it is not a pointsman. sent6: the weatherman is a kind of a pointsman if the rockrose is a counterculture. sent7: something does mediate if the fact that it does set is right. sent8: the weatherman is a pointsman but it is not a counterculture if the rockrose is a counterculture. sent9: the antibacterial is not an avalanche or is androgenic or both. sent10: the rockrose is not a ape-man but it is a kind of a counterculture if the weatherman is not a kind of a pointsman. sent11: the antibacterial does contemn globulin if either it is not ataxic or it does contemn Brancusi or both. sent12: the antibacterial is a ape-man if the weatherman is a pointsman but it is not a counterculture. sent13: the antibacterial either is progestational or avalanches or both. sent14: if the weatherman is androgenic then the fact that it is not a pointsman is true. sent15: that the rockrose does contemn globulin and it is androgenic does not hold. sent16: the rockrose is not androgenic. sent17: the rockrose is a counterculture if it does contemn globulin. sent18: if that the antibacterial is not progestational is right then it is a set. sent19: the fact that the antibacterial is not a kind of a counterculture is not incorrect if it is mediate. sent20: the rockrose is a counterculture if it is an avalanche. sent21: the antibacterial sets if either it is not progestational or it avalanches or both. sent22: the antibacterial is not progestational and/or it is a kind of an avalanche if it is not ataxic. sent23: the misanthrope is ataxic. sent24: if the rockrose is mediate the antibacterial is a kind of a counterculture that does not mediate. sent25: the weatherman is a pointsman. sent26: if something is not a ape-man but it is a kind of a counterculture then it is androgenic. sent27: the antibacterial is progestational and/or it is an avalanche if it is not ataxic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rockrose does contemn globulin but it is not androgenic.; assump1 -> int1: the rockrose does contemn globulin.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the rockrose is a counterculture.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the weatherman is a kind of a pointsman that is not a counterculture.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the antibacterial is a kind of a ape-man.; sent2 -> int5: the antibacterial does not mediate if it is a ape-man.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antibacterial does not mediate.; sent7 -> int7: if the antibacterial is a kind of a set it does mediate.; sent22 & sent4 -> int8: the antibacterial is non-progestational and/or is a kind of an avalanche.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the antibacterial sets.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the antibacterial mediates.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: that the rockrose does contemn globulin but it is not androgenic is wrong.; int12 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__