the rabbit does habituate.
sent1: the hobbledehoy does not hunger creaminess if there exists something such that that it is not a Harrison and not a club-head is not right. sent2: that the fink is not a suppression and it is not a jassid is not true. sent3: the wanter does not hunger creaminess if there is something such that that it is not a club-head and does not habituate is not right. sent4: something that is a kind of a Belgian burglarizes Cairene. sent5: if the multiflora is not a kind of a club-head then the fact that it is not a screening and it does not habituate is incorrect. sent6: something does hunger creaminess if that it does not screen and it does not orchestrate wood-frog is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a chenfish and is multiple-choice is not true. sent8: if the fact that the hobbledehoy is a Harrison is not incorrect then it is not a screening and not a club-head. sent9: if the rabbit is not a clang and does hunger creaminess the hobbledehoy is not a clang. sent10: that the wanter is not a Harrison and it is not a club-head is not true. sent11: something does habituate if that it is not a Cornish and it is not a clang is not true. sent12: the rabbit does orchestrate wood-frog if it is not a kind of a Cornish and it does not clang. sent13: that the hobbledehoy is not a screening and it does not orchestrate wood-frog does not hold if the fact that the rabbit does orchestrate wood-frog is correct. sent14: if something screens then it hungers creaminess. sent15: the fact that the Cairene hungers creaminess is true. sent16: if that the hobbledehoy is unshockable but it is not a Harrison is not true that that it is not a Harrison is not correct is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rabbit is not a Cornish and it does not clang.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the rabbit does orchestrate wood-frog.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the hobbledehoy does not screen and it does not orchestrate wood-frog is correct is false.; sent6 -> int3: if that the hobbledehoy is not a screening and it does not orchestrate wood-frog does not hold it hungers creaminess.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hobbledehoy hungers creaminess.; sent10 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Harrison and it is not a kind of a club-head is incorrect.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the hobbledehoy does not hunger creaminess.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the rabbit is not a Cornish and not a clang does not hold.; sent11 -> int9: the rabbit habituates if that it is not Cornish and is not a kind of a clang is not right.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rabbit does not habituate is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the rabbit does habituate. ; $context$ = sent1: the hobbledehoy does not hunger creaminess if there exists something such that that it is not a Harrison and not a club-head is not right. sent2: that the fink is not a suppression and it is not a jassid is not true. sent3: the wanter does not hunger creaminess if there is something such that that it is not a club-head and does not habituate is not right. sent4: something that is a kind of a Belgian burglarizes Cairene. sent5: if the multiflora is not a kind of a club-head then the fact that it is not a screening and it does not habituate is incorrect. sent6: something does hunger creaminess if that it does not screen and it does not orchestrate wood-frog is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a chenfish and is multiple-choice is not true. sent8: if the fact that the hobbledehoy is a Harrison is not incorrect then it is not a screening and not a club-head. sent9: if the rabbit is not a clang and does hunger creaminess the hobbledehoy is not a clang. sent10: that the wanter is not a Harrison and it is not a club-head is not true. sent11: something does habituate if that it is not a Cornish and it is not a clang is not true. sent12: the rabbit does orchestrate wood-frog if it is not a kind of a Cornish and it does not clang. sent13: that the hobbledehoy is not a screening and it does not orchestrate wood-frog does not hold if the fact that the rabbit does orchestrate wood-frog is correct. sent14: if something screens then it hungers creaminess. sent15: the fact that the Cairene hungers creaminess is true. sent16: if that the hobbledehoy is unshockable but it is not a Harrison is not true that that it is not a Harrison is not correct is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rabbit is not a Cornish and it does not clang.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the rabbit does orchestrate wood-frog.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the hobbledehoy does not screen and it does not orchestrate wood-frog is correct is false.; sent6 -> int3: if that the hobbledehoy is not a screening and it does not orchestrate wood-frog does not hold it hungers creaminess.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hobbledehoy hungers creaminess.; sent10 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Harrison and it is not a kind of a club-head is incorrect.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the hobbledehoy does not hunger creaminess.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the rabbit is not a Cornish and not a clang does not hold.; sent11 -> int9: the rabbit habituates if that it is not Cornish and is not a kind of a clang is not right.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__