the fact that the armadillo is a shearing if the cosmetician justifies ohmage is false.
sent1: if the cosmetician is a pucker the slice pucker. sent2: the cosmetician is deficient. sent3: if the fact that the armadillo is not deficient is not incorrect the cosmetician is a kind of a igniter or is a pucker or both. sent4: the cosmetician is deficient and a igniter. sent5: there is something such that it is a epidendron. sent6: something is a epidendron if it is a acidophilus. sent7: the fact that the cobaltite is nonextant and is not non-pelvic is not right. sent8: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it is both nonextant and pelvic is not correct the cowboy is not nonextant hold. sent9: something that is not inhospitable is not a shearing and jams. sent10: the armadillo is a shearing and a jam if there exists something such that that it is not a epidendron is right. sent11: something is a acidophilus if that it does housekeep casern and it is not a kind of a acidophilus is not correct. sent12: the fact that the clockwork is not anisogametic and is a macromolecule is false if there exists something such that it is a Sarpedon. sent13: there is something such that it does relace theca. sent14: if something is a kind of a igniter and does justify ohmage then it is not a epidendron. sent15: the translator is not inhospitable if there is something such that that it is not anisogametic and it is a macromolecule does not hold. sent16: something contributes and/or it justifies ohmage if the fact that it is not a shearing is correct. sent17: the vertebrate is hospitable if the translator is hospitable. sent18: that the armadillo housekeeps casern but it is not a acidophilus is not right if the cowboy is not nonextant. sent19: the millpond is a kind of a Sarpedon and it is prosthetics. sent20: the slice does contribute if the vertebrate contribute. sent21: if the cosmetician is a kind of a igniter the slice puckers. sent22: the slice does contribute if the vertebrate justifies ohmage.
sent4 -> int1: the cosmetician is a kind of a igniter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cosmetician justifies ohmage.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cosmetician is a igniter and does justify ohmage.; sent14 -> int3: if the cosmetician is a igniter and does justify ohmage then that it is not a kind of a epidendron is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cosmetician is not a epidendron.; int4 -> int5: something is not a kind of a epidendron.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the armadillo does shear and it is a kind of a jam.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the armadillo is a shearing is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the slice contributes and it is a pucker.
sent16 -> int8: the vertebrate contributes and/or it does justify ohmage if it is not a shearing.; sent9 -> int9: if the vertebrate is hospitable then it is not a shearing and it is a jam.; sent19 -> int10: the millpond is a kind of a Sarpedon.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is a Sarpedon.; int11 & sent12 -> int12: that the clockwork is non-anisogametic and is a macromolecule does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is not anisogametic but a macromolecule is false.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the translator is hospitable.; sent17 & int14 -> int15: the vertebrate is hospitable.; int9 & int15 -> int16: the vertebrate is not a shearing but it is a jam.; int16 -> int17: that the vertebrate is not a shearing is correct.; int8 & int17 -> int18: the vertebrate does contribute and/or justifies ohmage.; int18 & sent20 & sent22 -> int19: the slice contributes.; sent6 -> int20: if the armadillo is a acidophilus it is a epidendron.; sent11 -> int21: the armadillo is a kind of a acidophilus if that it housekeeps casern and it is not a acidophilus does not hold.; sent7 -> int22: there exists something such that that it is nonextant and it is pelvic does not hold.; int22 & sent8 -> int23: the cowboy is not nonextant.; sent18 & int23 -> int24: that the armadillo does housekeep casern but it is not a acidophilus is false.; int21 & int24 -> int25: the armadillo is a acidophilus.; int20 & int25 -> int26: the armadillo is a epidendron.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the armadillo is a shearing if the cosmetician justifies ohmage is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cosmetician is a pucker the slice pucker. sent2: the cosmetician is deficient. sent3: if the fact that the armadillo is not deficient is not incorrect the cosmetician is a kind of a igniter or is a pucker or both. sent4: the cosmetician is deficient and a igniter. sent5: there is something such that it is a epidendron. sent6: something is a epidendron if it is a acidophilus. sent7: the fact that the cobaltite is nonextant and is not non-pelvic is not right. sent8: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it is both nonextant and pelvic is not correct the cowboy is not nonextant hold. sent9: something that is not inhospitable is not a shearing and jams. sent10: the armadillo is a shearing and a jam if there exists something such that that it is not a epidendron is right. sent11: something is a acidophilus if that it does housekeep casern and it is not a kind of a acidophilus is not correct. sent12: the fact that the clockwork is not anisogametic and is a macromolecule is false if there exists something such that it is a Sarpedon. sent13: there is something such that it does relace theca. sent14: if something is a kind of a igniter and does justify ohmage then it is not a epidendron. sent15: the translator is not inhospitable if there is something such that that it is not anisogametic and it is a macromolecule does not hold. sent16: something contributes and/or it justifies ohmage if the fact that it is not a shearing is correct. sent17: the vertebrate is hospitable if the translator is hospitable. sent18: that the armadillo housekeeps casern but it is not a acidophilus is not right if the cowboy is not nonextant. sent19: the millpond is a kind of a Sarpedon and it is prosthetics. sent20: the slice does contribute if the vertebrate contribute. sent21: if the cosmetician is a kind of a igniter the slice puckers. sent22: the slice does contribute if the vertebrate justifies ohmage. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the cosmetician is a kind of a igniter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cosmetician justifies ohmage.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cosmetician is a igniter and does justify ohmage.; sent14 -> int3: if the cosmetician is a igniter and does justify ohmage then that it is not a kind of a epidendron is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cosmetician is not a epidendron.; int4 -> int5: something is not a kind of a epidendron.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the armadillo does shear and it is a kind of a jam.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the armadillo is a shearing is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__