the midstream clears struggling.
sent1: the trapeze does not clear ctenophore if the fact that the foreshore is not a spud and is a kind of a timepiece is not right. sent2: if something does not stage Donatism then the fact that it is not a spud and is a kind of a timepiece is wrong. sent3: the foreshore does not stage Donatism and is not Djiboutian if the fact that the drinking is lentic hold. sent4: the drinking is lentic. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a woodcut and it is pectineal is not correct then the midstream does clear struggling. sent6: the fact that the stenograph is not a woodcut but it is pectineal is incorrect if the trapeze does not clear ctenophore.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the foreshore does not stage Donatism and it is not a kind of a Djiboutian.; int1 -> int2: the foreshore does not stage Donatism.; sent2 -> int3: if the foreshore does not stage Donatism the fact that it does not spud and it is a timepiece is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the foreshore is not a spud and is a timepiece is not correct.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the trapeze does not clear ctenophore.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the stenograph is not a woodcut but pectineal is false.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a woodcut and it is pectineal is not correct.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the midstream clears struggling. ; $context$ = sent1: the trapeze does not clear ctenophore if the fact that the foreshore is not a spud and is a kind of a timepiece is not right. sent2: if something does not stage Donatism then the fact that it is not a spud and is a kind of a timepiece is wrong. sent3: the foreshore does not stage Donatism and is not Djiboutian if the fact that the drinking is lentic hold. sent4: the drinking is lentic. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a woodcut and it is pectineal is not correct then the midstream does clear struggling. sent6: the fact that the stenograph is not a woodcut but it is pectineal is incorrect if the trapeze does not clear ctenophore. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the foreshore does not stage Donatism and it is not a kind of a Djiboutian.; int1 -> int2: the foreshore does not stage Donatism.; sent2 -> int3: if the foreshore does not stage Donatism the fact that it does not spud and it is a timepiece is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the foreshore is not a spud and is a timepiece is not correct.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the trapeze does not clear ctenophore.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the stenograph is not a woodcut but pectineal is false.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a woodcut and it is pectineal is not correct.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__