the jurist does stoke techno.
sent1: something that is analogous stokes techno and is not a kind of an elan. sent2: that the buzzard is not ischemic but it is polymorphous does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Hmong. sent3: if the germanite is not a kind of a penetration then that the eyewitness is not a eggbeater and does not grade perinatology is not right. sent4: there is something such that that it is ischemic and it is polymorphous is not right. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a lowness. sent6: that the eyewitness does not stoke techno is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is analogous is true. sent7: something that is ischemic does not stoke techno and is a Hmong. sent8: the jurist is not an elan if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a eggbeater and does not grade perinatology is not correct. sent9: if the jurist is a kind of a eggbeater the eyewitness is analogous. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a tutorial and does grade eyewitness. sent11: the jurist is ischemic if it is not a kind of an elan and is not polymorphous. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is not ischemic but polymorphous is not correct the eyewitness does not stoke techno. sent13: the germanite is not a penetration. sent14: the seashell is not ischemic if something that is not a Hmong is polymorphous. sent15: something is non-Hmong.
sent15 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the buzzard is both not ischemic and polymorphous is right does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not ischemic and is not non-polymorphous is not right.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the eyewitness does not stoke techno.;
the fact that the jurist does not stoke techno is not incorrect.
sent7 -> int4: if the jurist is ischemic then it does not stoke techno and is a Hmong.; sent3 & sent13 -> int5: that the eyewitness is not a eggbeater and it does not grade perinatology is not right.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a eggbeater and it does not grade perinatology is false.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the jurist is not an elan hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the jurist does stoke techno. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is analogous stokes techno and is not a kind of an elan. sent2: that the buzzard is not ischemic but it is polymorphous does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Hmong. sent3: if the germanite is not a kind of a penetration then that the eyewitness is not a eggbeater and does not grade perinatology is not right. sent4: there is something such that that it is ischemic and it is polymorphous is not right. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a lowness. sent6: that the eyewitness does not stoke techno is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is analogous is true. sent7: something that is ischemic does not stoke techno and is a Hmong. sent8: the jurist is not an elan if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a eggbeater and does not grade perinatology is not correct. sent9: if the jurist is a kind of a eggbeater the eyewitness is analogous. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a tutorial and does grade eyewitness. sent11: the jurist is ischemic if it is not a kind of an elan and is not polymorphous. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is not ischemic but polymorphous is not correct the eyewitness does not stoke techno. sent13: the germanite is not a penetration. sent14: the seashell is not ischemic if something that is not a Hmong is polymorphous. sent15: something is non-Hmong. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the buzzard is both not ischemic and polymorphous is right does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not ischemic and is not non-polymorphous is not right.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the eyewitness does not stoke techno.; __UNKNOWN__