the codlins-and-cream does not yodel baptistry and is not an extortion.
sent1: if the belay is not a Ivanov then the fact that it is not a contentedness and it is centrosomic is false. sent2: something is both budgetary and metamorphic if it is not a kind of a atonality. sent3: if that something is an extortion and it does yodel baptistry is false then it does not yodel baptistry. sent4: if the belay does not yodel baptistry the transduction is a Ivanov but it does not unpick loss. sent5: if something does unpick loss it yodels baptistry. sent6: if something does not unpick belay it unpicks loss and it does unpick extremity. sent7: if the belay does yodel baptistry then that that the codlins-and-cream does not yodel baptistry and is not a kind of an extortion hold is not true. sent8: if the archer winnows Moho and does not unpick Shearer the fact that it is not a atonality is true. sent9: the bowl is not a Paget if the Shearer is not an annex and it does not bog Salmon. sent10: that the chlorambucil is a reimbursement and it is a Tussaud is not right. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not ethereal and it is not a Paget is incorrect. sent12: that the archer winnows Moho hold. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not a Paget then that the piece is a frontal or ethereal or both is not right. sent14: the fact that the codlins-and-cream does yodel baptistry but it is not an extortion is wrong. sent15: the belay is not a Ivanov. sent16: that the archer does not unpick Shearer is true. sent17: that the codlins-and-cream does unpick belay hold if there is something such that that it is frontal and/or it is ethereal is wrong. sent18: if there is something such that it is budgetary then the Shearer does not annex and it does not bog Salmon. sent19: something does unpick loss if that it is not centrosomic hold. sent20: the belay winnows Moho if it is a gipsywort. sent21: something does not yodel baptistry and it is not an extortion if it is a kind of a Ivanov. sent22: if the belay is a frontal then the codlins-and-cream does not unpick belay. sent23: if the fact that something is not a contentedness but centrosomic does not hold then it unpicks loss. sent24: something unpicks extremity if it does unpick belay.
sent1 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the belay is not a contentedness and is centrosomic is not right.; sent23 -> int2: if that the fact that the fact that the belay is both not a contentedness and centrosomic is right is wrong is not false it does unpick loss.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the belay does unpick loss.; sent5 -> int4: the belay yodels baptistry if it does unpick loss.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the belay does yodel baptistry is right.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the codlins-and-cream does not yodel baptistry and it is not a kind of an extortion.
sent21 -> int6: the codlins-and-cream does not yodel baptistry and it is not an extortion if it is a Ivanov.; sent6 -> int7: the codlins-and-cream does unpick loss and it does unpick extremity if the fact that it does not unpick belay is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the codlins-and-cream does not yodel baptistry and is not an extortion. ; $context$ = sent1: if the belay is not a Ivanov then the fact that it is not a contentedness and it is centrosomic is false. sent2: something is both budgetary and metamorphic if it is not a kind of a atonality. sent3: if that something is an extortion and it does yodel baptistry is false then it does not yodel baptistry. sent4: if the belay does not yodel baptistry the transduction is a Ivanov but it does not unpick loss. sent5: if something does unpick loss it yodels baptistry. sent6: if something does not unpick belay it unpicks loss and it does unpick extremity. sent7: if the belay does yodel baptistry then that that the codlins-and-cream does not yodel baptistry and is not a kind of an extortion hold is not true. sent8: if the archer winnows Moho and does not unpick Shearer the fact that it is not a atonality is true. sent9: the bowl is not a Paget if the Shearer is not an annex and it does not bog Salmon. sent10: that the chlorambucil is a reimbursement and it is a Tussaud is not right. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not ethereal and it is not a Paget is incorrect. sent12: that the archer winnows Moho hold. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not a Paget then that the piece is a frontal or ethereal or both is not right. sent14: the fact that the codlins-and-cream does yodel baptistry but it is not an extortion is wrong. sent15: the belay is not a Ivanov. sent16: that the archer does not unpick Shearer is true. sent17: that the codlins-and-cream does unpick belay hold if there is something such that that it is frontal and/or it is ethereal is wrong. sent18: if there is something such that it is budgetary then the Shearer does not annex and it does not bog Salmon. sent19: something does unpick loss if that it is not centrosomic hold. sent20: the belay winnows Moho if it is a gipsywort. sent21: something does not yodel baptistry and it is not an extortion if it is a kind of a Ivanov. sent22: if the belay is a frontal then the codlins-and-cream does not unpick belay. sent23: if the fact that something is not a contentedness but centrosomic does not hold then it unpicks loss. sent24: something unpicks extremity if it does unpick belay. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the belay is not a contentedness and is centrosomic is not right.; sent23 -> int2: if that the fact that the fact that the belay is both not a contentedness and centrosomic is right is wrong is not false it does unpick loss.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the belay does unpick loss.; sent5 -> int4: the belay yodels baptistry if it does unpick loss.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the belay does yodel baptistry is right.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__