the fact that the nitrogenase is not a kind of a cabinet but it outshouts cannibalism is false.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a Heller that is ctenoid. sent2: the nitrogenase is not a cabinet. sent3: there exists something such that it is ctenoid. sent4: the fact that something is a Heller but it is not ctenoid does not hold if it is not a kind of a Modicon. sent5: something does not outshout cannibalism if the fact that it does not network Thessalonian and outshout cannibalism is incorrect. sent6: something is a Modicon and it is a humor. sent7: the dig networks groenendael if there is something such that it is not a Heller and it is ctenoid. sent8: if the dig networks groenendael the nitrogenase is not a cabinet and does outshout cannibalism. sent9: if the ammoniac is a kind of a Heller the fact that the sputnik does not network Thessalonian and outshouts cannibalism is wrong. sent10: the nitrogenase is not a cabinet if the fact that the dig networks groenendael hold. sent11: the ammoniac does not network groenendael. sent12: the ammoniac is not a Modicon if there exists something such that it is not a Modicon. sent13: if the ammoniac networks Thessalonian it is a Modicon. sent14: if the sputnik is a Heller the ammoniac does network Thessalonian. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Modicon that is a humor is not true then the fact that the ammoniac is not a Modicon hold. sent16: the ammoniac is a Heller if that the dig is a Heller and is not ctenoid does not hold. sent17: the fact that the snapshot is a beta-adrenoceptor hold. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is a Modicon and it is a humor is wrong. sent19: if the snapshot is a kind of a beta-adrenoceptor then the sputnik is ctenoid.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sputnik is a Heller.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the ammoniac does network Thessalonian.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the ammoniac is a Modicon.; sent18 & sent15 -> int3: the ammoniac is not a Modicon.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sputnik is not a kind of a Heller.; sent19 & sent17 -> int6: the sputnik is ctenoid.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sputnik is not a kind of a Heller but it is ctenoid.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not a Heller and is ctenoid.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the dig does network groenendael.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the nitrogenase is not a cabinet and does outshout cannibalism is false.
sent5 -> int10: if the fact that the sputnik does not network Thessalonian but it does outshout cannibalism is not correct it does not outshout cannibalism.; sent4 -> int11: the fact that the dig is a Heller but it is not ctenoid does not hold if it is not a Modicon.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the nitrogenase is not a kind of a cabinet but it outshouts cannibalism is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a Heller that is ctenoid. sent2: the nitrogenase is not a cabinet. sent3: there exists something such that it is ctenoid. sent4: the fact that something is a Heller but it is not ctenoid does not hold if it is not a kind of a Modicon. sent5: something does not outshout cannibalism if the fact that it does not network Thessalonian and outshout cannibalism is incorrect. sent6: something is a Modicon and it is a humor. sent7: the dig networks groenendael if there is something such that it is not a Heller and it is ctenoid. sent8: if the dig networks groenendael the nitrogenase is not a cabinet and does outshout cannibalism. sent9: if the ammoniac is a kind of a Heller the fact that the sputnik does not network Thessalonian and outshouts cannibalism is wrong. sent10: the nitrogenase is not a cabinet if the fact that the dig networks groenendael hold. sent11: the ammoniac does not network groenendael. sent12: the ammoniac is not a Modicon if there exists something such that it is not a Modicon. sent13: if the ammoniac networks Thessalonian it is a Modicon. sent14: if the sputnik is a Heller the ammoniac does network Thessalonian. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Modicon that is a humor is not true then the fact that the ammoniac is not a Modicon hold. sent16: the ammoniac is a Heller if that the dig is a Heller and is not ctenoid does not hold. sent17: the fact that the snapshot is a beta-adrenoceptor hold. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is a Modicon and it is a humor is wrong. sent19: if the snapshot is a kind of a beta-adrenoceptor then the sputnik is ctenoid. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sputnik is a Heller.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the ammoniac does network Thessalonian.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the ammoniac is a Modicon.; sent18 & sent15 -> int3: the ammoniac is not a Modicon.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sputnik is not a kind of a Heller.; sent19 & sent17 -> int6: the sputnik is ctenoid.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sputnik is not a kind of a Heller but it is ctenoid.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not a Heller and is ctenoid.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the dig does network groenendael.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__