that the leaven is not a kind of a coachman is correct.
sent1: the carbonation is a kind of a gestalt or it is a degeneracy or both if the fact that the Coue is not a knell hold. sent2: something is a coachman if that it is Himalayan and it is not a coachman is not true. sent3: if that the denizen is not a Ranier hold that it is both a knell and not impenetrable is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that something is a Ranier and it does cancel instructorship does not hold then it is not a kind of a Ranier. sent5: the fact that the rotogravure is antiseptic but it is not a spotter is false. sent6: that the jessamine is a BIN but it does not excuse is not true if it is not a hindfoot. sent7: the quarterstaff is not Himalayan if the fact that the jessamine is both not a BIN and not an excuse is not correct. sent8: the quarterstaff is either not Himalayan or a hindfoot or both. sent9: the fact that the fact that the jessamine is a BIN but it is not a kind of an excuse hold is not correct. sent10: the leaven is not a kind of a coachman if the quarterstaff is not Himalayan and/or it is not a markup. sent11: that the leaven is not a coachman but a BIN is false if it is not Himalayan. sent12: if the means is a kind of a gestalt that the earshot is not a hindfoot but it is a markup is false. sent13: the quarterstaff is not Himalayan if the jessamine is a BIN. sent14: that something is a BIN and is not an excuse is incorrect if it is not a kind of a hindfoot. sent15: if the fact that the jessamine is a kind of a hindfoot that is not a gestalt is not correct then it is not a hindfoot. sent16: if something is not a kind of a hindfoot then the fact that it is both not a BIN and not an excuse is false. sent17: if that the denizen does knell but it is not impenetrable is not correct the Coue is not a knell. sent18: the jessamine is not a resorption. sent19: if the quarterstaff is not a markup then the leaven is not a coachman. sent20: if the quarterstaff either is not a gestalt or is not a BIN or both then the jessamine is not Himalayan. sent21: the quarterstaff is not Himalayan or is a kind of a markup or both. sent22: if that the earshot is not a hindfoot but it is a markup does not hold the quarterstaff is a coachman. sent23: the fact that if the leaven is not a kind of a coachman and/or it is not a markup the quarterstaff is not a BIN is not wrong. sent24: the fact that something is not a gestalt but a coachman is wrong if it is not a markup.
sent16 -> int1: if the jessamine is not a hindfoot then that it is not a BIN and it is not an excuse is wrong.;
the leaven is a coachman.
sent2 -> int2: if the fact that the leaven is both Himalayan and not a coachman is wrong then that it is a coachman is correct.; sent4 -> int3: the denizen is not a Ranier if that it is a Ranier and it cancels instructorship is false.;
$hypothesis$ = that the leaven is not a kind of a coachman is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the carbonation is a kind of a gestalt or it is a degeneracy or both if the fact that the Coue is not a knell hold. sent2: something is a coachman if that it is Himalayan and it is not a coachman is not true. sent3: if that the denizen is not a Ranier hold that it is both a knell and not impenetrable is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that something is a Ranier and it does cancel instructorship does not hold then it is not a kind of a Ranier. sent5: the fact that the rotogravure is antiseptic but it is not a spotter is false. sent6: that the jessamine is a BIN but it does not excuse is not true if it is not a hindfoot. sent7: the quarterstaff is not Himalayan if the fact that the jessamine is both not a BIN and not an excuse is not correct. sent8: the quarterstaff is either not Himalayan or a hindfoot or both. sent9: the fact that the fact that the jessamine is a BIN but it is not a kind of an excuse hold is not correct. sent10: the leaven is not a kind of a coachman if the quarterstaff is not Himalayan and/or it is not a markup. sent11: that the leaven is not a coachman but a BIN is false if it is not Himalayan. sent12: if the means is a kind of a gestalt that the earshot is not a hindfoot but it is a markup is false. sent13: the quarterstaff is not Himalayan if the jessamine is a BIN. sent14: that something is a BIN and is not an excuse is incorrect if it is not a kind of a hindfoot. sent15: if the fact that the jessamine is a kind of a hindfoot that is not a gestalt is not correct then it is not a hindfoot. sent16: if something is not a kind of a hindfoot then the fact that it is both not a BIN and not an excuse is false. sent17: if that the denizen does knell but it is not impenetrable is not correct the Coue is not a knell. sent18: the jessamine is not a resorption. sent19: if the quarterstaff is not a markup then the leaven is not a coachman. sent20: if the quarterstaff either is not a gestalt or is not a BIN or both then the jessamine is not Himalayan. sent21: the quarterstaff is not Himalayan or is a kind of a markup or both. sent22: if that the earshot is not a hindfoot but it is a markup does not hold the quarterstaff is a coachman. sent23: the fact that if the leaven is not a kind of a coachman and/or it is not a markup the quarterstaff is not a BIN is not wrong. sent24: the fact that something is not a gestalt but a coachman is wrong if it is not a markup. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the jessamine is not a hindfoot then that it is not a BIN and it is not an excuse is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__