that there is something such that if it is not a prick then it ladles babyminder and does not bury ponytail does not hold.
sent1: that something buries hyperthermia but it does not bespeak if it does not ladle babyminder is correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not articulate then it is an infrastructure and it is not non-binomial. sent3: that the White ladles babyminder but it does not bury ponytail is right if it is not a kind of a prick. sent4: the White is systematics but it is not epilithic if it does not bury ponytail. sent5: there is something such that if it is not imperialistic it is a binomial and it is not a Perseus. sent6: there is something such that if it does not abuse disjunction the fact that it is gutless and it is not a kind of a beacon is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is not insoluble it is a exaltation and is a capitulation. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a manner then it miffs and is a potentiometer. sent9: the White is unnoticeable but it is not a kind of a prick if it is not like. sent10: if the White is not a prick then the fact that it does ladle babyminder is true. sent11: if the White is not a kind of a prick it does ladle babyminder and does bury ponytail. sent12: there is something such that if it is a prick it ladles babyminder and it does not bury ponytail. sent13: the White does ladle babyminder but it does not bury ponytail if that it is a kind of a prick is not wrong.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the autofluorescence does not ladle babyminder then it does bury hyperthermia and does not bespeak.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a prick then it ladles babyminder and does not bury ponytail does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something buries hyperthermia but it does not bespeak if it does not ladle babyminder is correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not articulate then it is an infrastructure and it is not non-binomial. sent3: that the White ladles babyminder but it does not bury ponytail is right if it is not a kind of a prick. sent4: the White is systematics but it is not epilithic if it does not bury ponytail. sent5: there is something such that if it is not imperialistic it is a binomial and it is not a Perseus. sent6: there is something such that if it does not abuse disjunction the fact that it is gutless and it is not a kind of a beacon is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is not insoluble it is a exaltation and is a capitulation. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a manner then it miffs and is a potentiometer. sent9: the White is unnoticeable but it is not a kind of a prick if it is not like. sent10: if the White is not a prick then the fact that it does ladle babyminder is true. sent11: if the White is not a kind of a prick it does ladle babyminder and does bury ponytail. sent12: there is something such that if it is a prick it ladles babyminder and it does not bury ponytail. sent13: the White does ladle babyminder but it does not bury ponytail if that it is a kind of a prick is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__