that either the apposition or the non-covalentness or both occurs is wrong.
sent1: the blizzard happens. sent2: that the blizzard and the exempting finale happens results in that the harangue does not occur. sent3: the harangue occurs. sent4: if the arrest and the ecdemicness occurs then the chylificness does not occur. sent5: if the anureticness does not occur then the ecdemicness happens and the exempting diversification does not occur. sent6: if that the operableness does not occur and the cremating ghrelin does not occur does not hold the cremating ghrelin occurs. sent7: the covalentness does not occur if the cesareanness does not occur. sent8: that the cremating ghrelin happens yields that either the non-cesareanness or the existentialistness or both occurs. sent9: if the chylificness does not occur then both the Goetheanness and the capableness occurs. sent10: if the fact that the Goetheanness occurs is right then the justness does not occur and the cleaning trudger does not occur. sent11: the harangue and/or that the exempting finale happens is triggered by that the cesareanness does not occur. sent12: the arrest happens. sent13: that that the apposition and/or the non-covalentness occurs does not hold if the fact that the blizzard does not occur hold hold. sent14: the covalentness is prevented by that either the cesareanness does not occur or the exempting finale does not occur or both. sent15: the cesareanness does not occur if the non-cesareanness and/or the existentialist occurs. sent16: if the justness does not occur the exempting Plimsoll happens and the describing Lepanto does not occur. sent17: the fact that the operableness does not occur and the cremating ghrelin does not occur is false if that the exempting Plimsoll happens is true. sent18: that the perambulating and the flocculating occurs prevents the cleaning Eisenstaedt.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exempting finale occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the blizzard occurs and the exempting finale occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the haranguing does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the exempting finale does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the cesareanness does not occur or the exempting finale does not occur or both.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the covalentness does not occur.; int6 -> hypothesis;
that either the apposition occurs or the covalentness does not occur or both is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = that either the apposition or the non-covalentness or both occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the blizzard happens. sent2: that the blizzard and the exempting finale happens results in that the harangue does not occur. sent3: the harangue occurs. sent4: if the arrest and the ecdemicness occurs then the chylificness does not occur. sent5: if the anureticness does not occur then the ecdemicness happens and the exempting diversification does not occur. sent6: if that the operableness does not occur and the cremating ghrelin does not occur does not hold the cremating ghrelin occurs. sent7: the covalentness does not occur if the cesareanness does not occur. sent8: that the cremating ghrelin happens yields that either the non-cesareanness or the existentialistness or both occurs. sent9: if the chylificness does not occur then both the Goetheanness and the capableness occurs. sent10: if the fact that the Goetheanness occurs is right then the justness does not occur and the cleaning trudger does not occur. sent11: the harangue and/or that the exempting finale happens is triggered by that the cesareanness does not occur. sent12: the arrest happens. sent13: that that the apposition and/or the non-covalentness occurs does not hold if the fact that the blizzard does not occur hold hold. sent14: the covalentness is prevented by that either the cesareanness does not occur or the exempting finale does not occur or both. sent15: the cesareanness does not occur if the non-cesareanness and/or the existentialist occurs. sent16: if the justness does not occur the exempting Plimsoll happens and the describing Lepanto does not occur. sent17: the fact that the operableness does not occur and the cremating ghrelin does not occur is false if that the exempting Plimsoll happens is true. sent18: that the perambulating and the flocculating occurs prevents the cleaning Eisenstaedt. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exempting finale occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the blizzard occurs and the exempting finale occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the haranguing does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the exempting finale does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the cesareanness does not occur or the exempting finale does not occur or both.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the covalentness does not occur.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__