that there is something such that if the fact that it does not julienne Schleiden and does deduce is incorrect it is not septic does not hold.
sent1: if that the preschooler does not julienne Schleiden but it does deduce is not right then it is septic. sent2: something is not a kind of a supernatural if that it is not a kind of a Orleanist and is textile does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if that it is a kind of catalectic thing that does julienne myxoma does not hold then it does not pant-hoot. sent4: the preschooler is not septic if that it does not julienne Schleiden and deduces does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not julienne Schleiden and it does deduce is false it is septic.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Orleanist and it is textile does not hold that it is not a supernatural is right.
sent2 -> int1: the nubbin is not a supernatural if the fact that it is both not a Orleanist and textile is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it does not julienne Schleiden and does deduce is incorrect it is not septic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the preschooler does not julienne Schleiden but it does deduce is not right then it is septic. sent2: something is not a kind of a supernatural if that it is not a kind of a Orleanist and is textile does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if that it is a kind of catalectic thing that does julienne myxoma does not hold then it does not pant-hoot. sent4: the preschooler is not septic if that it does not julienne Schleiden and deduces does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not julienne Schleiden and it does deduce is false it is septic. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__