that if the handing attic does not occur then the disabusing Spam happens and the meioticness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the handing sensationalism happens and/or the overstraining admirer happens. sent2: that the disabusing Spam happens and the meioticness happens is caused by that the handing attic occurs. sent3: the non-postmenopausalness or the decocting or both causes that the meioticness occurs. sent4: the cutinizing and the disabusing enation occurs. sent5: the eruption does not occur if that both the eruption and the airworthiness happens does not hold. sent6: that either the mollification does not occur or the draft happens or both is caused by the volunteer. sent7: that the handing attic does not occur yields that the postmenopausalness happens and/or that the decocting occurs. sent8: if the eruption does not occur the disabusing Spam happens. sent9: if the handing attic does not occur then the non-postmenopausalness and/or the decocting happens. sent10: that the eruption happens and the airworthiness occurs is false. sent11: if the postmenopausalness does not occur then the meioticness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handing attic does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the non-postmenopausalness or the decocting or both happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the meioticness occurs.; sent5 & sent10 -> int3: the eruption does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the disabusing Spam happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the disabusing Spam and the meioticness occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the handing attic does not occur then the disabusing Spam happens and the meioticness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the handing sensationalism happens and/or the overstraining admirer happens. sent2: that the disabusing Spam happens and the meioticness happens is caused by that the handing attic occurs. sent3: the non-postmenopausalness or the decocting or both causes that the meioticness occurs. sent4: the cutinizing and the disabusing enation occurs. sent5: the eruption does not occur if that both the eruption and the airworthiness happens does not hold. sent6: that either the mollification does not occur or the draft happens or both is caused by the volunteer. sent7: that the handing attic does not occur yields that the postmenopausalness happens and/or that the decocting occurs. sent8: if the eruption does not occur the disabusing Spam happens. sent9: if the handing attic does not occur then the non-postmenopausalness and/or the decocting happens. sent10: that the eruption happens and the airworthiness occurs is false. sent11: if the postmenopausalness does not occur then the meioticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handing attic does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the non-postmenopausalness or the decocting or both happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the meioticness occurs.; sent5 & sent10 -> int3: the eruption does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the disabusing Spam happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the disabusing Spam and the meioticness occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__