the shamrock does sidle sourdough.
sent1: the rutherfordium does not clinch shamrock. sent2: that the shamrock does not sidle sourdough is true if it is a kind of a invariability and it clinches rutherfordium. sent3: if the fact that something does nap but it does not sidle graze is false it is iridic. sent4: if the shamrock is not a nap and it does not clinch shamrock then the rutherfordium does nap. sent5: The rutherfordium clinches shamrock. sent6: the shamrock clinches rutherfordium. sent7: The shamrock does not clinch rutherfordium. sent8: there is something such that it does clinch rutherfordium and sidles sourdough. sent9: if the shamrock is not a kind of a invariability then that the rutherfordium naps and does not sidle graze is not true. sent10: something is unpleasant if that it is iridic is not wrong. sent11: the rutherfordium clinches shamrock if it is unpleasant.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shamrock is not a invariability.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the rutherfordium naps but it does not sidle graze is false.; sent3 -> int2: if the fact that the rutherfordium naps and does not sidle graze is not right then it is iridic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the rutherfordium is iridic.; sent10 -> int4: the fact that if the rutherfordium is iridic the rutherfordium is unpleasant is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the rutherfordium is unpleasant.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the rutherfordium does clinch shamrock.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the shamrock is a invariability.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the shamrock is a invariability and does clinch rutherfordium.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the rutherfordium is a nap and sidles meritocracy.
$hypothesis$ = the shamrock does sidle sourdough. ; $context$ = sent1: the rutherfordium does not clinch shamrock. sent2: that the shamrock does not sidle sourdough is true if it is a kind of a invariability and it clinches rutherfordium. sent3: if the fact that something does nap but it does not sidle graze is false it is iridic. sent4: if the shamrock is not a nap and it does not clinch shamrock then the rutherfordium does nap. sent5: The rutherfordium clinches shamrock. sent6: the shamrock clinches rutherfordium. sent7: The shamrock does not clinch rutherfordium. sent8: there is something such that it does clinch rutherfordium and sidles sourdough. sent9: if the shamrock is not a kind of a invariability then that the rutherfordium naps and does not sidle graze is not true. sent10: something is unpleasant if that it is iridic is not wrong. sent11: the rutherfordium clinches shamrock if it is unpleasant. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shamrock is not a invariability.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the rutherfordium naps but it does not sidle graze is false.; sent3 -> int2: if the fact that the rutherfordium naps and does not sidle graze is not right then it is iridic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the rutherfordium is iridic.; sent10 -> int4: the fact that if the rutherfordium is iridic the rutherfordium is unpleasant is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the rutherfordium is unpleasant.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the rutherfordium does clinch shamrock.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the shamrock is a invariability.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the shamrock is a invariability and does clinch rutherfordium.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__