the do-si-do but not the repudiation happens.
sent1: if the resizing plunk happens then the thunder happens. sent2: that that the do-si-do but not the repudiation happens is right is false if the unionizing Christology does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the roasting does not occur but the unionizing myeloma happens is not true the obtuseness does not occur. sent4: that the obtuseness does not occur leads to that the gerrymandering does not occur or that the hallelujah does not occur or both. sent5: the fact that not the roasting but the unionizing myeloma occurs is not right if the remission happens. sent6: that the reappearance happens and the tournament occurs is not right if the gerrymandering does not occur. sent7: that the reappearance does not occur leads to that the do-si-do but not the repudiation happens. sent8: the sneering pueblo does not occur if both the thundering and the clinking furnace occurs. sent9: the remission but not the clinking neighborliness happens if the sneering pueblo does not occur. sent10: not the channelization but the resizing plunk occurs. sent11: the gerrymander does not occur if either the gerrymander does not occur or the hallelujah does not occur or both. sent12: the unionizing Christology occurs. sent13: the tournament happens.
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the unionizing Christology and the tournament happens.;
that the do-si-do occurs and the repudiation does not occur is not correct.
sent10 -> int2: the resizing plunk happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the thunder occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the do-si-do but not the repudiation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the resizing plunk happens then the thunder happens. sent2: that that the do-si-do but not the repudiation happens is right is false if the unionizing Christology does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the roasting does not occur but the unionizing myeloma happens is not true the obtuseness does not occur. sent4: that the obtuseness does not occur leads to that the gerrymandering does not occur or that the hallelujah does not occur or both. sent5: the fact that not the roasting but the unionizing myeloma occurs is not right if the remission happens. sent6: that the reappearance happens and the tournament occurs is not right if the gerrymandering does not occur. sent7: that the reappearance does not occur leads to that the do-si-do but not the repudiation happens. sent8: the sneering pueblo does not occur if both the thundering and the clinking furnace occurs. sent9: the remission but not the clinking neighborliness happens if the sneering pueblo does not occur. sent10: not the channelization but the resizing plunk occurs. sent11: the gerrymander does not occur if either the gerrymander does not occur or the hallelujah does not occur or both. sent12: the unionizing Christology occurs. sent13: the tournament happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the unionizing Christology and the tournament happens.; __UNKNOWN__