the destructiveness does not occur.
sent1: that both the exhortation and the halving camlet happens is triggered by that the illiterateness does not occur. sent2: the illiterate happens. sent3: that the diving chickadee but not the diving Phellodendron happens is not right. sent4: if the fact that the arenaceousness does not occur is true the halving jigger does not occur. sent5: if the halving camlet and the illiterateness happens the diving Helodermatidae does not occur. sent6: that the aphakicness occurs is not wrong. sent7: the sou'wester is prevented by that the halving camlet does not occur. sent8: the fact that that the lentenness happens and the blistering Angelus occurs is not right is correct if that the aphakic occurs is right. sent9: if the illiterateness does not occur the halving camlet occurs and the destructiveness occurs. sent10: if that the blistering Angelus does not occur is true the sou'wester occurs. sent11: both the Congregationalness and the ankyloticness occurs. sent12: if the aphakic occurs then the fact that the lentenness happens and the blistering Angelus does not occur is not right. sent13: if the fact that the blistering Angelus occurs is correct the diving Helodermatidae occurs. sent14: if the sou'wester does not occur then the destructiveness does not occur. sent15: that the lentenness happens and the blistering Angelus occurs is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the halving camlet occurs.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the halving camlet and the illiterateness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the diving Helodermatidae does not occur.; sent12 & sent6 -> int3: that the lentenness occurs but the blistering Angelus does not occur does not hold.;
the exhortation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the destructiveness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the exhortation and the halving camlet happens is triggered by that the illiterateness does not occur. sent2: the illiterate happens. sent3: that the diving chickadee but not the diving Phellodendron happens is not right. sent4: if the fact that the arenaceousness does not occur is true the halving jigger does not occur. sent5: if the halving camlet and the illiterateness happens the diving Helodermatidae does not occur. sent6: that the aphakicness occurs is not wrong. sent7: the sou'wester is prevented by that the halving camlet does not occur. sent8: the fact that that the lentenness happens and the blistering Angelus occurs is not right is correct if that the aphakic occurs is right. sent9: if the illiterateness does not occur the halving camlet occurs and the destructiveness occurs. sent10: if that the blistering Angelus does not occur is true the sou'wester occurs. sent11: both the Congregationalness and the ankyloticness occurs. sent12: if the aphakic occurs then the fact that the lentenness happens and the blistering Angelus does not occur is not right. sent13: if the fact that the blistering Angelus occurs is correct the diving Helodermatidae occurs. sent14: if the sou'wester does not occur then the destructiveness does not occur. sent15: that the lentenness happens and the blistering Angelus occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the halving camlet occurs.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the halving camlet and the illiterateness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the diving Helodermatidae does not occur.; sent12 & sent6 -> int3: that the lentenness occurs but the blistering Angelus does not occur does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__