that that the pyromaniac is not a kind of a match but it is a kind of a realgar is true is not correct.
sent1: the rill is a duster and/or it is a kind of a bronze. sent2: if the rill is not a speedskater then it is not a duster and it is a bronze. sent3: that the procarbazine is a kind of a rouge that is not geostrategic does not hold if the Sarawakian is a kind of a rouge. sent4: the Sarawakian is geostrategic. sent5: the rill is not a kind of a speedskater if the procarbazine is not a speedskater. sent6: the fact that the ropewalk does not guarantee Vanbrugh and is not a match is wrong. sent7: everything is apoplectic and it does queen osprey. sent8: the fact that something is not a match but it is a kind of a realgar is not correct if it is not a duster. sent9: the pyromaniac is not a match and is a realgar if the ropewalk is not a kind of a match. sent10: if the Sarawakian is a rouge the fact that the procarbazine is not a rouge and it is not geostrategic is not true. sent11: the pyromaniac is not a match. sent12: the Sarawakian guarantees Vanbrugh if the bivalve is a rouge. sent13: the bivalve is a speedskater if that the procarbazine does not rouge and it is non-geostrategic is not correct. sent14: if the rill is a kind of a duster then the Sarawakian does rouge. sent15: that the pyromaniac is not a bronze and is not a kind of a match is wrong. sent16: the ropewalk does not match if the bivalve is a speedskater that guarantees Vanbrugh. sent17: something that is apoplectic does guarantee Vanbrugh. sent18: if the rill does bronze then the Sarawakian is a rouge. sent19: the rill is a speedskater. sent20: that the bivalve is not apoplectic and not a bronze is wrong if the rill is apoplectic.
sent1 & sent14 & sent18 -> int1: the Sarawakian does rouge.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that that the procarbazine does not rouge and it is non-geostrategic does not hold hold.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the fact that the bivalve is a speedskater is correct.; sent17 -> int4: the bivalve does guarantee Vanbrugh if it is apoplectic.; sent7 -> int5: the bivalve is a kind of apoplectic thing that queens osprey.; int5 -> int6: the bivalve is apoplectic.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the bivalve guarantees Vanbrugh.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the bivalve is a kind of a speedskater that does guarantee Vanbrugh.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the ropewalk is not a match.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the irreligionist does rouge is true.
$hypothesis$ = that that the pyromaniac is not a kind of a match but it is a kind of a realgar is true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the rill is a duster and/or it is a kind of a bronze. sent2: if the rill is not a speedskater then it is not a duster and it is a bronze. sent3: that the procarbazine is a kind of a rouge that is not geostrategic does not hold if the Sarawakian is a kind of a rouge. sent4: the Sarawakian is geostrategic. sent5: the rill is not a kind of a speedskater if the procarbazine is not a speedskater. sent6: the fact that the ropewalk does not guarantee Vanbrugh and is not a match is wrong. sent7: everything is apoplectic and it does queen osprey. sent8: the fact that something is not a match but it is a kind of a realgar is not correct if it is not a duster. sent9: the pyromaniac is not a match and is a realgar if the ropewalk is not a kind of a match. sent10: if the Sarawakian is a rouge the fact that the procarbazine is not a rouge and it is not geostrategic is not true. sent11: the pyromaniac is not a match. sent12: the Sarawakian guarantees Vanbrugh if the bivalve is a rouge. sent13: the bivalve is a speedskater if that the procarbazine does not rouge and it is non-geostrategic is not correct. sent14: if the rill is a kind of a duster then the Sarawakian does rouge. sent15: that the pyromaniac is not a bronze and is not a kind of a match is wrong. sent16: the ropewalk does not match if the bivalve is a speedskater that guarantees Vanbrugh. sent17: something that is apoplectic does guarantee Vanbrugh. sent18: if the rill does bronze then the Sarawakian is a rouge. sent19: the rill is a speedskater. sent20: that the bivalve is not apoplectic and not a bronze is wrong if the rill is apoplectic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent14 & sent18 -> int1: the Sarawakian does rouge.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that that the procarbazine does not rouge and it is non-geostrategic does not hold hold.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the fact that the bivalve is a speedskater is correct.; sent17 -> int4: the bivalve does guarantee Vanbrugh if it is apoplectic.; sent7 -> int5: the bivalve is a kind of apoplectic thing that queens osprey.; int5 -> int6: the bivalve is apoplectic.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the bivalve guarantees Vanbrugh.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the bivalve is a kind of a speedskater that does guarantee Vanbrugh.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the ropewalk is not a match.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__