the inductee is adequate.
sent1: something is both adequate and a rectus if the fact that it is not a acidophil is right. sent2: if something is not a Glaswegian then it is caryophyllaceous. sent3: the fireclay is classicistic if the Reaper is not a kind of a supernaturalism. sent4: the inductee is not a kind of a acidophil if there exists something such that it is classicistic or it is stoichiometric or both. sent5: if the inductee is not a acidophil it is a rectus. sent6: if the fireclay is stoichiometric then the Reaper is classicistic. sent7: if the fact that there is something such that it is a kind of a supernaturalism is not incorrect then that the Reaper is not a acidophil is correct. sent8: that the inductee is not a hryvnia is not false if there is something such that either it is a acidophil or it is adequate or both. sent9: the Reaper either is not a supernaturalism or is not a kind of a hryvnia or both. sent10: the fact that if the fireclay is not stoichiometric the fireclay is adequate is not wrong. sent11: the inductee is a rectus. sent12: if something is classicistic then it is a hryvnia. sent13: if the Reaper is a supernaturalism but it is not adequate then the inductee is not adequate. sent14: either the baya is not stoichiometric or it is not a pharmaceutical or both.
sent1 -> int1: if the inductee is not a acidophil it is both adequate and a rectus.;
the inductee is not adequate.
sent12 -> int2: if the Reaper is classicistic it is a hryvnia.;
$hypothesis$ = the inductee is adequate. ; $context$ = sent1: something is both adequate and a rectus if the fact that it is not a acidophil is right. sent2: if something is not a Glaswegian then it is caryophyllaceous. sent3: the fireclay is classicistic if the Reaper is not a kind of a supernaturalism. sent4: the inductee is not a kind of a acidophil if there exists something such that it is classicistic or it is stoichiometric or both. sent5: if the inductee is not a acidophil it is a rectus. sent6: if the fireclay is stoichiometric then the Reaper is classicistic. sent7: if the fact that there is something such that it is a kind of a supernaturalism is not incorrect then that the Reaper is not a acidophil is correct. sent8: that the inductee is not a hryvnia is not false if there is something such that either it is a acidophil or it is adequate or both. sent9: the Reaper either is not a supernaturalism or is not a kind of a hryvnia or both. sent10: the fact that if the fireclay is not stoichiometric the fireclay is adequate is not wrong. sent11: the inductee is a rectus. sent12: if something is classicistic then it is a hryvnia. sent13: if the Reaper is a supernaturalism but it is not adequate then the inductee is not adequate. sent14: either the baya is not stoichiometric or it is not a pharmaceutical or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the inductee is not a acidophil it is both adequate and a rectus.; __UNKNOWN__