that the defloration and the relevantness happens is not correct.
sent1: the combinativeness does not occur and the unimpressiveness does not occur. sent2: that the unimpressiveness does not occur is correct. sent3: that the glazing psychotherapist and the soldiering happens is caused by that the clannishness does not occur. sent4: the clannishness does not occur and the idiolatry does not occur. sent5: that the Babylonian does not occur yields that both the defloration and the relevantness occurs. sent6: if both the non-combinativeness and the impressiveness occurs then the Babylonianness does not occur.
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the Babylonianness does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the defloration and the relevantness happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the combinativeness does not occur and the unimpressiveness does not occur. sent2: that the unimpressiveness does not occur is correct. sent3: that the glazing psychotherapist and the soldiering happens is caused by that the clannishness does not occur. sent4: the clannishness does not occur and the idiolatry does not occur. sent5: that the Babylonian does not occur yields that both the defloration and the relevantness occurs. sent6: if both the non-combinativeness and the impressiveness occurs then the Babylonianness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the Babylonianness does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__