the lubricant is a kind of a disparity that does not house hemiepiphyte.
sent1: that the fact that something is not a kind of a Bohr and it is not a kind of a feel is not false is not correct if it is not a kind of a circular. sent2: the fact that the support is a kind of a Bohr but it is not a kind of a feel is not true if it is not circular. sent3: that something is not a Bohr and is a kind of a feel is wrong if it is not circular. sent4: there is something such that that it does pave and it is a Sumerian is not right. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a hurrying that houses hemiepiphyte is not correct. sent6: if the support is a circular then the fact that the lubricant is a kind of a disparity but it does not house hemiepiphyte is wrong. sent7: the lubricant is a kind of a disparity but it does not house hemiepiphyte if it is not a kind of a hurrying. sent8: if there is something such that that it does pave and is not non-Sumerian is not true then the fact that the support is not a circular hold. sent9: if the fact that the support is not a Bohr and it is not a feel does not hold then the lubricant is not a hurrying. sent10: the fact that the lubricant does feel but it is not a Bohr is incorrect if the bait is a kind of a hurrying.
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the support is not a circular.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the support is not a Bohr and it does not feel does not hold if the fact that it is not a circular is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the support is not a Bohr and not a feel is incorrect.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the lubricant is not a kind of a hurrying.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that that it suffers support and it is disproportionate is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the lubricant is a kind of a disparity that does not house hemiepiphyte. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that something is not a kind of a Bohr and it is not a kind of a feel is not false is not correct if it is not a kind of a circular. sent2: the fact that the support is a kind of a Bohr but it is not a kind of a feel is not true if it is not circular. sent3: that something is not a Bohr and is a kind of a feel is wrong if it is not circular. sent4: there is something such that that it does pave and it is a Sumerian is not right. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a hurrying that houses hemiepiphyte is not correct. sent6: if the support is a circular then the fact that the lubricant is a kind of a disparity but it does not house hemiepiphyte is wrong. sent7: the lubricant is a kind of a disparity but it does not house hemiepiphyte if it is not a kind of a hurrying. sent8: if there is something such that that it does pave and is not non-Sumerian is not true then the fact that the support is not a circular hold. sent9: if the fact that the support is not a Bohr and it is not a feel does not hold then the lubricant is not a hurrying. sent10: the fact that the lubricant does feel but it is not a Bohr is incorrect if the bait is a kind of a hurrying. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the support is not a circular.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the support is not a Bohr and it does not feel does not hold if the fact that it is not a circular is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the support is not a Bohr and not a feel is incorrect.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the lubricant is not a kind of a hurrying.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__