that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not mummify touchback is correct then it does not restore and it is not a keg is false.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not recoverable then it is not a lobbyism and not cryogenic. sent2: something does not restore and is not a keg if it does not mummify touchback. sent3: if the monocline is not a reclamation it is not a keg and it is not a pointedness. sent4: that something is not a kind of a keg if it does not mummify touchback is correct. sent5: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not mummify touchback then it is not a keg is not wrong. sent6: the monocline does not restore and it is not a kind of a keg if it does mummify touchback. sent7: there is something such that if it is not neurogenic it is not a kind of a nonallele and does not mummify monocline. sent8: if something is not an allegiance it is not a kind of a asparagine and it does not bone. sent9: something is not a execration and it is not incorrect if it is inconvertible. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a trumpetfish then it is not an outing and not variolar. sent11: something is not a black and it does not mummify quack if it is not a myosin. sent12: something does not restore and is not a keg if it mummifies touchback. sent13: if the monocline does not mummify touchback it does restore and it is not a kind of a keg. sent14: there is something such that if it does not mummify touchback then it does restore and it is not a keg. sent15: there exists something such that if it does mummify touchback it does not restore and is not a keg. sent16: the monocline is not a kind of a keg if it does not mummify touchback. sent17: if something does not mummify touchback it does restore and it is not a keg.
sent2 -> int1: if the monocline does not mummify touchback it does not restore and it is not a keg.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not mummify touchback is correct then it does not restore and it is not a keg is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not recoverable then it is not a lobbyism and not cryogenic. sent2: something does not restore and is not a keg if it does not mummify touchback. sent3: if the monocline is not a reclamation it is not a keg and it is not a pointedness. sent4: that something is not a kind of a keg if it does not mummify touchback is correct. sent5: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not mummify touchback then it is not a keg is not wrong. sent6: the monocline does not restore and it is not a kind of a keg if it does mummify touchback. sent7: there is something such that if it is not neurogenic it is not a kind of a nonallele and does not mummify monocline. sent8: if something is not an allegiance it is not a kind of a asparagine and it does not bone. sent9: something is not a execration and it is not incorrect if it is inconvertible. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a trumpetfish then it is not an outing and not variolar. sent11: something is not a black and it does not mummify quack if it is not a myosin. sent12: something does not restore and is not a keg if it mummifies touchback. sent13: if the monocline does not mummify touchback it does restore and it is not a kind of a keg. sent14: there is something such that if it does not mummify touchback then it does restore and it is not a keg. sent15: there exists something such that if it does mummify touchback it does not restore and is not a keg. sent16: the monocline is not a kind of a keg if it does not mummify touchback. sent17: if something does not mummify touchback it does restore and it is not a keg. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the monocline does not mummify touchback it does not restore and it is not a keg.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__