the wandering does not occur.
sent1: if the beaklessness does not occur the raying denominationalism does not occur. sent2: if the beaklessness occurs then that the raying denominationalism but not the incidence occurs is not correct. sent3: the laicizing cantilever does not occur. sent4: the beaklessness is prevented by that the fingering vesiculovirus does not occur and the laicizing pseudohermaphrodite does not occur. sent5: the fingering vesiculovirus does not occur and the laicizing pseudohermaphrodite does not occur. sent6: the wandering occurs if the raying denominationalism does not occur. sent7: the beaklessness occurs if the wandering does not occur and the laicizing liege does not occur. sent8: that the fingering Lascaux happens brings about that the wandering does not occur and the laicizing liege does not occur. sent9: the incidence happens if the fact that the raying denominationalism but not the incidence occurs is not true.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the beaklessness does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the raying denominationalism does not occur hold.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the incidence happens.
$hypothesis$ = the wandering does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the beaklessness does not occur the raying denominationalism does not occur. sent2: if the beaklessness occurs then that the raying denominationalism but not the incidence occurs is not correct. sent3: the laicizing cantilever does not occur. sent4: the beaklessness is prevented by that the fingering vesiculovirus does not occur and the laicizing pseudohermaphrodite does not occur. sent5: the fingering vesiculovirus does not occur and the laicizing pseudohermaphrodite does not occur. sent6: the wandering occurs if the raying denominationalism does not occur. sent7: the beaklessness occurs if the wandering does not occur and the laicizing liege does not occur. sent8: that the fingering Lascaux happens brings about that the wandering does not occur and the laicizing liege does not occur. sent9: the incidence happens if the fact that the raying denominationalism but not the incidence occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the beaklessness does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the raying denominationalism does not occur hold.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__