if the alarmism occurs the embellishment happens.
sent1: if the shearing occurs then the avellanness happens. sent2: that the axonalness happens but the sobriety does not occur is false if the genialness does not occur. sent3: the shampooing solleret does not occur if that the axonalness but not the sobriety happens is not correct. sent4: the fact that the concerning Duncan but not the expensing reinforcement happens does not hold. sent5: that both the axonalness and the sobriety occurs does not hold if the genialness does not occur. sent6: if the naught occurs the marine occurs. sent7: if not the fossilizing but the intensiveness happens then that the thinkableness occurs is right. sent8: that the on-lineness and the convenientness happens does not hold. sent9: the eagerness occurs. sent10: the shampooing hosier happens. sent11: the hypotonicness does not occur. sent12: the independentness occurs. sent13: that that the axonalness occurs and the sobriety happens is false is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the genialness but not the retirement occurs is wrong. sent15: the concerning antimycin happens if the scentlessness happens. sent16: that the embellishment occurs is triggered by that not the shampooing solleret but the alarmism occurs. sent17: the expensing apprehender does not occur if that the lexicostatisticness occurs and/or the teasing does not occur is wrong. sent18: that the disposableness occurs and/or the dystopianness does not occur is incorrect. sent19: the fact that the down-bow occurs but the vaudeville does not occur does not hold. sent20: if the sobriety happens then the shampooing solleret does not occur. sent21: the fact that the hypotonicness and/or the non-nebulousness occurs is wrong. sent22: that the harmlessness occurs or the expensing lemonade does not occur or both is not correct. sent23: the careerism happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genialness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = if the alarmism occurs the embellishment happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shearing occurs then the avellanness happens. sent2: that the axonalness happens but the sobriety does not occur is false if the genialness does not occur. sent3: the shampooing solleret does not occur if that the axonalness but not the sobriety happens is not correct. sent4: the fact that the concerning Duncan but not the expensing reinforcement happens does not hold. sent5: that both the axonalness and the sobriety occurs does not hold if the genialness does not occur. sent6: if the naught occurs the marine occurs. sent7: if not the fossilizing but the intensiveness happens then that the thinkableness occurs is right. sent8: that the on-lineness and the convenientness happens does not hold. sent9: the eagerness occurs. sent10: the shampooing hosier happens. sent11: the hypotonicness does not occur. sent12: the independentness occurs. sent13: that that the axonalness occurs and the sobriety happens is false is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the genialness but not the retirement occurs is wrong. sent15: the concerning antimycin happens if the scentlessness happens. sent16: that the embellishment occurs is triggered by that not the shampooing solleret but the alarmism occurs. sent17: the expensing apprehender does not occur if that the lexicostatisticness occurs and/or the teasing does not occur is wrong. sent18: that the disposableness occurs and/or the dystopianness does not occur is incorrect. sent19: the fact that the down-bow occurs but the vaudeville does not occur does not hold. sent20: if the sobriety happens then the shampooing solleret does not occur. sent21: the fact that the hypotonicness and/or the non-nebulousness occurs is wrong. sent22: that the harmlessness occurs or the expensing lemonade does not occur or both is not correct. sent23: the careerism happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genialness happens.; __UNKNOWN__