the gyroscope is a impreciseness.
sent1: if the scalp does not rationalize Woolf the fact that either it is mammary or it is not unproductive or both is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the actinopod is a kind of a divarication is correct the fact that it is a kind of non-aneroid thing that does not deepen is incorrect. sent3: something is not mammary. sent4: the snowball does not rationalize Woolf and is not a Cladonia. sent5: if the actinopod does not reposition the fact that it sentimentalises statistic and does not rationalize lotto is not true. sent6: if the fact that something is mammary and/or it is not unproductive does not hold then it sentimentalises Alonso. sent7: the scalp does not rationalize Woolf if the snowball does not rationalize Woolf and is not a Cladonia. sent8: something does not sentimentalise Alonso if that it is not a aneroid and does not deepen is incorrect. sent9: if the actinopod is not aneroid but it does deepen the heartland is a kind of a divarication. sent10: that the gyroscope is not a kind of a impreciseness is true if the heartland is a divarication. sent11: if there is something such that that it sentimentalises statistic and it does not rationalize lotto is false the scalp does not sentimentalise Alonso. sent12: if that something repositions is not wrong then it is not a aneroid and it does deepen.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the actinopod does not reposition.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the actinopod sentimentalises statistic but it does not rationalize lotto is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it sentimentalises statistic and it does not rationalize lotto is not true.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the scalp does not sentimentalise Alonso is not wrong.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that either the scalp is mammary or it is not unproductive or both is not right it does sentimentalise Alonso.; sent7 & sent4 -> int5: the scalp does not rationalize Woolf.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the scalp is either mammary or productive or both does not hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the scalp sentimentalises Alonso.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the actinopod does reposition.; sent12 -> int10: if that the actinopod does reposition hold it is a kind of non-aneroid thing that does deepen.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the actinopod is not a kind of a aneroid but it does deepen.; int11 & sent9 -> int12: the heartland is a divarication.; int12 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the gyroscope is a kind of a impreciseness.
sent8 -> int13: if that the actinopod is non-aneroid thing that does not deepen does not hold it does not sentimentalise Alonso.;
$hypothesis$ = the gyroscope is a impreciseness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the scalp does not rationalize Woolf the fact that either it is mammary or it is not unproductive or both is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the actinopod is a kind of a divarication is correct the fact that it is a kind of non-aneroid thing that does not deepen is incorrect. sent3: something is not mammary. sent4: the snowball does not rationalize Woolf and is not a Cladonia. sent5: if the actinopod does not reposition the fact that it sentimentalises statistic and does not rationalize lotto is not true. sent6: if the fact that something is mammary and/or it is not unproductive does not hold then it sentimentalises Alonso. sent7: the scalp does not rationalize Woolf if the snowball does not rationalize Woolf and is not a Cladonia. sent8: something does not sentimentalise Alonso if that it is not a aneroid and does not deepen is incorrect. sent9: if the actinopod is not aneroid but it does deepen the heartland is a kind of a divarication. sent10: that the gyroscope is not a kind of a impreciseness is true if the heartland is a divarication. sent11: if there is something such that that it sentimentalises statistic and it does not rationalize lotto is false the scalp does not sentimentalise Alonso. sent12: if that something repositions is not wrong then it is not a aneroid and it does deepen. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the actinopod does not reposition.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the actinopod sentimentalises statistic but it does not rationalize lotto is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it sentimentalises statistic and it does not rationalize lotto is not true.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the scalp does not sentimentalise Alonso is not wrong.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that either the scalp is mammary or it is not unproductive or both is not right it does sentimentalise Alonso.; sent7 & sent4 -> int5: the scalp does not rationalize Woolf.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the scalp is either mammary or productive or both does not hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the scalp sentimentalises Alonso.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the actinopod does reposition.; sent12 -> int10: if that the actinopod does reposition hold it is a kind of non-aneroid thing that does deepen.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the actinopod is not a kind of a aneroid but it does deepen.; int11 & sent9 -> int12: the heartland is a divarication.; int12 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__