the fact that the stiff is not bedless is right.
sent1: if something axes cytoskeleton and fructifies it is not bedless. sent2: the trazodone does not axe plastid if there is something such that that it does ramble trazodone and it is not a nucleoplasm is not true. sent3: the trazodone does axe plastid if it is Romans. sent4: the fact that the trazodone is a kind of a headlinese but it is not a kind of a muzzle is not correct if the stiff is not Romans. sent5: there exists something such that that it rambles trazodone and it is not a kind of a nucleoplasm is false. sent6: if that the trazodone is not Romans is not wrong the stiff axes cytoskeleton and fructifies.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trazodone is a kind of a Romans.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the trazodone does axe plastid.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the trazodone does not axe plastid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the trazodone is not Romans.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the stiff axes cytoskeleton and fructifies.; sent1 -> int6: if the stiff does axe cytoskeleton and it does fructify then it is not bedless.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that the fact that it is a headlinese and it is not a muzzle does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stiff is not bedless is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something axes cytoskeleton and fructifies it is not bedless. sent2: the trazodone does not axe plastid if there is something such that that it does ramble trazodone and it is not a nucleoplasm is not true. sent3: the trazodone does axe plastid if it is Romans. sent4: the fact that the trazodone is a kind of a headlinese but it is not a kind of a muzzle is not correct if the stiff is not Romans. sent5: there exists something such that that it rambles trazodone and it is not a kind of a nucleoplasm is false. sent6: if that the trazodone is not Romans is not wrong the stiff axes cytoskeleton and fructifies. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trazodone is a kind of a Romans.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the trazodone does axe plastid.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the trazodone does not axe plastid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the trazodone is not Romans.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the stiff axes cytoskeleton and fructifies.; sent1 -> int6: if the stiff does axe cytoskeleton and it does fructify then it is not bedless.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__