that that the demilitarizing one-eighth happens and the autumnalness occurs is false is not wrong.
sent1: if the homileticsness happens then the fact that the entozoanness does not occur and the devoting does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the glialness occurs and/or the contradistinguishing hydrolith occurs the duckpins does not occur. sent3: if that the entozoanness does not occur and the devoting does not occur does not hold the demilitarizing one-eighth occurs. sent4: that the dehumanization happens and the interleaving Merida happens is caused by that the snowboarding does not occur. sent5: the glialness occurs if the providentness occurs. sent6: the snowboarding does not occur. sent7: the autumnalness happens if the interleaving Merida happens. sent8: the fact that the glialness happens but the duckpins does not occur is not true if the contradistinguishing hydrolith happens. sent9: the providentness happens. sent10: both the homileticsness and the exposure happens if the duckpins does not occur.
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the glialness occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the glialness occurs or the contradistinguishing hydrolith occurs or both.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the duckpins does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the homileticsness and the exposure occurs.; int4 -> int5: the homileticsness occurs.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: that the entozoanness does not occur and the devoting does not occur is incorrect.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the demilitarizing one-eighth happens.; sent4 & sent6 -> int8: both the dehumanization and the interleaving Merida happens.; int8 -> int9: the interleaving Merida happens.; sent7 & int9 -> int10: the autumnalness happens.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the schism occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that that the demilitarizing one-eighth happens and the autumnalness occurs is false is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the homileticsness happens then the fact that the entozoanness does not occur and the devoting does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the glialness occurs and/or the contradistinguishing hydrolith occurs the duckpins does not occur. sent3: if that the entozoanness does not occur and the devoting does not occur does not hold the demilitarizing one-eighth occurs. sent4: that the dehumanization happens and the interleaving Merida happens is caused by that the snowboarding does not occur. sent5: the glialness occurs if the providentness occurs. sent6: the snowboarding does not occur. sent7: the autumnalness happens if the interleaving Merida happens. sent8: the fact that the glialness happens but the duckpins does not occur is not true if the contradistinguishing hydrolith happens. sent9: the providentness happens. sent10: both the homileticsness and the exposure happens if the duckpins does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the glialness occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the glialness occurs or the contradistinguishing hydrolith occurs or both.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the duckpins does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the homileticsness and the exposure occurs.; int4 -> int5: the homileticsness occurs.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: that the entozoanness does not occur and the devoting does not occur is incorrect.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the demilitarizing one-eighth happens.; sent4 & sent6 -> int8: both the dehumanization and the interleaving Merida happens.; int8 -> int9: the interleaving Merida happens.; sent7 & int9 -> int10: the autumnalness happens.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__