that the outcaste is a yarrow hold.
sent1: if that the toupee does not sequence mestiza is not wrong then the D crochets outcaste. sent2: if the fact that the lime is a kind of a Cartier hold the outcaste is a kind of a yarrow. sent3: if the fact that the toupee is not a polarimeter is correct then the D does crochet outcaste. sent4: the Baedeker is life-support thing that is indoor. sent5: the lime is a Cartier if the fact that the D does not crochet outcaste is not correct. sent6: the lime is indoor. sent7: if the fact that the toupee is not a kind of a polarimeter and/or it does not sequence mestiza does not hold the Baedeker is non-life-support. sent8: the fact that if the Baedeker is not life-support and/or it does crochet outcaste the toupee does crochet outcaste is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the toupee is not a polarimeter or does not sequence mestiza or both does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Baedeker is not life-support.; sent4 -> int2: the Baedeker is life-support.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: either the toupee is not a polarimeter or it does not sequence mestiza or both.; int4 & sent3 & sent1 -> int5: the D does crochet outcaste.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the lime is a Cartier.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the outcaste is not a yarrow.
$hypothesis$ = that the outcaste is a yarrow hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the toupee does not sequence mestiza is not wrong then the D crochets outcaste. sent2: if the fact that the lime is a kind of a Cartier hold the outcaste is a kind of a yarrow. sent3: if the fact that the toupee is not a polarimeter is correct then the D does crochet outcaste. sent4: the Baedeker is life-support thing that is indoor. sent5: the lime is a Cartier if the fact that the D does not crochet outcaste is not correct. sent6: the lime is indoor. sent7: if the fact that the toupee is not a kind of a polarimeter and/or it does not sequence mestiza does not hold the Baedeker is non-life-support. sent8: the fact that if the Baedeker is not life-support and/or it does crochet outcaste the toupee does crochet outcaste is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the toupee is not a polarimeter or does not sequence mestiza or both does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Baedeker is not life-support.; sent4 -> int2: the Baedeker is life-support.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: either the toupee is not a polarimeter or it does not sequence mestiza or both.; int4 & sent3 & sent1 -> int5: the D does crochet outcaste.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the lime is a Cartier.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__