the fact that there exists something such that if it is polytheistic then it is not a electrograph is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is branchy then the fact that it is a retailer is not wrong. sent2: there is something such that if it is unalike it is not prosthodontic. sent3: there is something such that if it is resolute it is economics. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a buteonine then it is a kind of a sublimation is not false. sent5: if the photograph is polytheistic then it is not a electrograph. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a mastery then that it does hum regularity is not incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is steroidal it is full-time. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a tramontane then it is a cogged. sent9: there is something such that if it is a succorer the fact that it is prosthodontic is right. sent10: a bipedal thing is not floricultural. sent11: there exists something such that if it does hum modicum it is not hypothermic. sent12: the photograph does not introspect if it is not non-polytheistic. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a lankiness it is not a reversion. sent14: there is something such that if it is civics then the fact that it is a kind of a cogged is not false. sent15: there is something such that if it is catechismal then it is typographic. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it is tramontane is not false it does not shush murder. sent17: if the photograph is polytheistic then it is a electrograph. sent18: there exists something such that if it does shush watercraft it prefigures.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the ulceration is not bipedal does not hold it is not floricultural.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is polytheistic then it is not a electrograph is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is branchy then the fact that it is a retailer is not wrong. sent2: there is something such that if it is unalike it is not prosthodontic. sent3: there is something such that if it is resolute it is economics. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a buteonine then it is a kind of a sublimation is not false. sent5: if the photograph is polytheistic then it is not a electrograph. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a mastery then that it does hum regularity is not incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is steroidal it is full-time. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a tramontane then it is a cogged. sent9: there is something such that if it is a succorer the fact that it is prosthodontic is right. sent10: a bipedal thing is not floricultural. sent11: there exists something such that if it does hum modicum it is not hypothermic. sent12: the photograph does not introspect if it is not non-polytheistic. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a lankiness it is not a reversion. sent14: there is something such that if it is civics then the fact that it is a kind of a cogged is not false. sent15: there is something such that if it is catechismal then it is typographic. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it is tramontane is not false it does not shush murder. sent17: if the photograph is polytheistic then it is a electrograph. sent18: there exists something such that if it does shush watercraft it prefigures. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__