the fact that the spark is a nectary and unidimensional does not hold.
sent1: the engine is Zolaesque. sent2: if the fact that something does churn and it is viscometric does not hold it is not orthodox. sent3: if the fact that the fact that something is a nectary and non-Zolaesque hold is not correct it is not a kind of a nectary. sent4: if the odometer is not a churn the fact that the pasha churn and it is viscometric is wrong. sent5: the spark is biogenetic and it is a nectary if the pasha is not orthodox. sent6: the spark is unidimensional. sent7: if something is Zolaesque it is not a churn. sent8: if the engine is Zolaesque then the odometer is Zolaesque. sent9: the fact that the pasha is not orthodox hold if it is not viscometric.
sent7 -> int1: if the odometer is Zolaesque then it does not churn.; sent8 & sent1 -> int2: the odometer is Zolaesque.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the odometer does not churn is right.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the pasha is both a churn and not non-viscometric is not right.; sent2 -> int5: if that the pasha churns and is viscometric is not correct then it is not orthodox.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pasha is not orthodox.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the spark is biogenetic thing that is a nectary.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the spark is a kind of a nectary hold.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the spark is a nectary and it is unidimensional is wrong.
sent3 -> int9: if the fact that the pasha is a nectary and is not Zolaesque is false then the fact that it is not a nectary is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the spark is a nectary and unidimensional does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the engine is Zolaesque. sent2: if the fact that something does churn and it is viscometric does not hold it is not orthodox. sent3: if the fact that the fact that something is a nectary and non-Zolaesque hold is not correct it is not a kind of a nectary. sent4: if the odometer is not a churn the fact that the pasha churn and it is viscometric is wrong. sent5: the spark is biogenetic and it is a nectary if the pasha is not orthodox. sent6: the spark is unidimensional. sent7: if something is Zolaesque it is not a churn. sent8: if the engine is Zolaesque then the odometer is Zolaesque. sent9: the fact that the pasha is not orthodox hold if it is not viscometric. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the odometer is Zolaesque then it does not churn.; sent8 & sent1 -> int2: the odometer is Zolaesque.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the odometer does not churn is right.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the pasha is both a churn and not non-viscometric is not right.; sent2 -> int5: if that the pasha churns and is viscometric is not correct then it is not orthodox.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pasha is not orthodox.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the spark is biogenetic thing that is a nectary.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the spark is a kind of a nectary hold.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__