if the gesture occurs then the utilization does not occur.
sent1: the utilization does not occur if the clapping Onagraceae but not the microeconomicsness occurs. sent2: the compoundedness does not occur. sent3: the apoplecticness does not occur if the fact that the attitude does not occur and the gapping does not occur is wrong. sent4: that the rationalness does not occur and the touting musket does not occur is not right. sent5: the utilization does not occur if the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent6: if the indurating violinist happens the fact that the bastardization does not occur is not false. sent7: the utilization does not occur if the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness happens. sent8: the touting pretext does not occur. sent9: the fact that the non-beneficentness and the dysphemisticness occurs is false. sent10: that the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness occurs is wrong. sent11: the utilization is triggered by that the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent12: that the gesture does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gesture happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur is not right.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: the gesture does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the utilization does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the gesture occurs then the utilization does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the utilization does not occur if the clapping Onagraceae but not the microeconomicsness occurs. sent2: the compoundedness does not occur. sent3: the apoplecticness does not occur if the fact that the attitude does not occur and the gapping does not occur is wrong. sent4: that the rationalness does not occur and the touting musket does not occur is not right. sent5: the utilization does not occur if the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent6: if the indurating violinist happens the fact that the bastardization does not occur is not false. sent7: the utilization does not occur if the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness happens. sent8: the touting pretext does not occur. sent9: the fact that the non-beneficentness and the dysphemisticness occurs is false. sent10: that the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness occurs is wrong. sent11: the utilization is triggered by that the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent12: that the gesture does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gesture happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur is not right.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: the gesture does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the clapping Onagraceae does not occur and the microeconomicsness does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the utilization does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__