that the spectrometer does not snick solvency and it is not a kind of a leveler is wrong if that the transplanter does plot Cyclopterus is right.
sent1: if the transplanter is a leveler that that the spectrometer does not snick solvency and does plot Cyclopterus is right is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a leveler that does snick solvency is not true. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it does plot Cyclopterus and it snicks solvency does not hold. sent4: if the ancient is not a kind of a leveler then that the spectrometer is not a kind of a barmbrack but it is a kind of a leveler is not right. sent5: the ancient does not French Solomons. sent6: the transplanter is not a leveler. sent7: the fact that the spectrometer does not snick solvency and it is not a kind of a leveler does not hold if the ancient is not a leveler. sent8: if the spectrometer is a kind of a leveler the fact that the ancient plots Cyclopterus and does not snick solvency is not right. sent9: the spectrometer is a barmbrack that is not a leveler. sent10: that the ancient is not a leveler but it does snick solvency does not hold if the spectrometer does not snick solvency. sent11: the Mays does not snick solvency. sent12: if there is something such that that it is a barmbrack and is not a leveler is not right the transplanter does not plot Cyclopterus. sent13: the fact that the transplanter does snick solvency and does not plot Cyclopterus is not right if the spectrometer is a barmbrack. sent14: if the spectrometer is a barmbrack the fact that the ancient does not snick solvency but it is a leveler is not right. sent15: that the spectrometer is not a leveler and it is not a barmbrack is wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the ancient is a barmbrack but it is not a leveler is wrong.; assump2 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a barmbrack and it is not a leveler does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the transplanter does not plot Cyclopterus.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transplanter does plot Cyclopterus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the ancient is both a barmbrack and not a leveler.; int4 -> int5: the ancient is not a leveler.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the spectrometer does not snick solvency and is not a leveler does not hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the spectrometer does not snick solvency and it is not a kind of a leveler is wrong if that the transplanter does plot Cyclopterus is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the transplanter is a leveler that that the spectrometer does not snick solvency and does plot Cyclopterus is right is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a leveler that does snick solvency is not true. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it does plot Cyclopterus and it snicks solvency does not hold. sent4: if the ancient is not a kind of a leveler then that the spectrometer is not a kind of a barmbrack but it is a kind of a leveler is not right. sent5: the ancient does not French Solomons. sent6: the transplanter is not a leveler. sent7: the fact that the spectrometer does not snick solvency and it is not a kind of a leveler does not hold if the ancient is not a leveler. sent8: if the spectrometer is a kind of a leveler the fact that the ancient plots Cyclopterus and does not snick solvency is not right. sent9: the spectrometer is a barmbrack that is not a leveler. sent10: that the ancient is not a leveler but it does snick solvency does not hold if the spectrometer does not snick solvency. sent11: the Mays does not snick solvency. sent12: if there is something such that that it is a barmbrack and is not a leveler is not right the transplanter does not plot Cyclopterus. sent13: the fact that the transplanter does snick solvency and does not plot Cyclopterus is not right if the spectrometer is a barmbrack. sent14: if the spectrometer is a barmbrack the fact that the ancient does not snick solvency but it is a leveler is not right. sent15: that the spectrometer is not a leveler and it is not a barmbrack is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the ancient is a barmbrack but it is not a leveler is wrong.; assump2 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a barmbrack and it is not a leveler does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the transplanter does not plot Cyclopterus.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transplanter does plot Cyclopterus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the ancient is both a barmbrack and not a leveler.; int4 -> int5: the ancient is not a leveler.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the spectrometer does not snick solvency and is not a leveler does not hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__