there exists something such that it does construct process and it is a telomere.
sent1: that something is not astrological is correct. sent2: the cornflower is a poker. sent3: if the cornflower is not a works that it is a poker is not incorrect. sent4: the Yeniseian is a works if the cornflower does works. sent5: the plywood does not wrap Yeniseian and does work if it is not a telomere. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does construct process is correct. sent7: something does hunger strychnine and is not hemispheric if it does wrap Yeniseian. sent8: the nanny is not hemispheric if it is a Baptist. sent9: that that the nanny is a kind of a Baptist but it does not hunger strychnine is true does not hold. sent10: if something is a Baptist then it is not hemispheric. sent11: that the nanny is not a kind of a Baptist and does not hunger strychnine does not hold. sent12: that something is not a kind of a Baptist and it is not an almanac is not correct if that it is a works is not wrong. sent13: the cornflower does not work if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a poker and/or does hunger strychnine does not hold. sent14: there is something such that it is not brimless and/or it is astrological. sent15: something does not wrap Yeniseian but it is a kind of a poker if the fact that it is not a kind of a works is not false. sent16: there is something such that the fact that either it is not hemispheric or it hungers strychnine or both is not right. sent17: if something does not work then it is a kind of a poker. sent18: the nanny is a Baptist if that it is not a Baptist and it does not hunger strychnine is wrong. sent19: there exists something such that it is brimless. sent20: there is something such that it is a telomere. sent21: the nanny is not hemispheric. sent22: the cornflower does not work if there is something such that that it is not brimless and/or is astrological is wrong. sent23: the nanny constructs process if the cornflower does not wrap Yeniseian but it is a poker. sent24: there is something such that the fact that it is not brimless and/or is not non-astrological is false. sent25: there is something such that the fact that either it is brimless or it is astrological or both is false. sent26: if something that does not wrap Yeniseian is a works it constructs process.
sent24 & sent22 -> int1: the cornflower is not a works.; sent15 -> int2: the cornflower does not wrap Yeniseian but it is a kind of a poker if it is not a kind of a works.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cornflower does not wrap Yeniseian but it is a poker.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the nanny constructs process.; sent18 & sent11 -> int5: the nanny is a Baptist.;
the plywood constructs process and is biotitic.
sent26 -> int6: if the plywood does not wrap Yeniseian and is a kind of a works it does construct process.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does construct process and it is a telomere. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not astrological is correct. sent2: the cornflower is a poker. sent3: if the cornflower is not a works that it is a poker is not incorrect. sent4: the Yeniseian is a works if the cornflower does works. sent5: the plywood does not wrap Yeniseian and does work if it is not a telomere. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does construct process is correct. sent7: something does hunger strychnine and is not hemispheric if it does wrap Yeniseian. sent8: the nanny is not hemispheric if it is a Baptist. sent9: that that the nanny is a kind of a Baptist but it does not hunger strychnine is true does not hold. sent10: if something is a Baptist then it is not hemispheric. sent11: that the nanny is not a kind of a Baptist and does not hunger strychnine does not hold. sent12: that something is not a kind of a Baptist and it is not an almanac is not correct if that it is a works is not wrong. sent13: the cornflower does not work if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a poker and/or does hunger strychnine does not hold. sent14: there is something such that it is not brimless and/or it is astrological. sent15: something does not wrap Yeniseian but it is a kind of a poker if the fact that it is not a kind of a works is not false. sent16: there is something such that the fact that either it is not hemispheric or it hungers strychnine or both is not right. sent17: if something does not work then it is a kind of a poker. sent18: the nanny is a Baptist if that it is not a Baptist and it does not hunger strychnine is wrong. sent19: there exists something such that it is brimless. sent20: there is something such that it is a telomere. sent21: the nanny is not hemispheric. sent22: the cornflower does not work if there is something such that that it is not brimless and/or is astrological is wrong. sent23: the nanny constructs process if the cornflower does not wrap Yeniseian but it is a poker. sent24: there is something such that the fact that it is not brimless and/or is not non-astrological is false. sent25: there is something such that the fact that either it is brimless or it is astrological or both is false. sent26: if something that does not wrap Yeniseian is a works it constructs process. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent22 -> int1: the cornflower is not a works.; sent15 -> int2: the cornflower does not wrap Yeniseian but it is a kind of a poker if it is not a kind of a works.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cornflower does not wrap Yeniseian but it is a poker.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the nanny constructs process.; sent18 & sent11 -> int5: the nanny is a Baptist.; __UNKNOWN__