the stumpknocker considers stumpknocker and/or is vegetal.
sent1: the stumpknocker is nonsyllabic. sent2: that the jetsam considers stumpknocker is correct. sent3: if the stumpknocker is a freedom but it is not vegetal then the copperware is vegetal. sent4: something is not a kind of a pheromone if it is not nonsyllabic and not a freedom. sent5: that the draft is a pheromone is not incorrect. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a modeling the Babylonian is not a kind of an ideal. sent7: something that is potent is not a kind of a toggle. sent8: that something considers stumpknocker or it is vegetal or both is wrong if it is not a kind of a pheromone. sent9: the stumpknocker is a pheromone and/or it does harshen Amur. sent10: something is nonsyllabic if it is vegetal. sent11: the stumpknocker is a kind of bacteriophagic thing that considers bulb. sent12: the teak is nonsyllabic. sent13: the stumpknocker is a dobra. sent14: if something is both not a Melopsittacus and a hurdles then the pianist models. sent15: something is not nonsyllabic and is not a freedom if it is not futuristic. sent16: the nutrient is a pachycephalosaur. sent17: the fact that the nutrient is not potent but it is diatomic does not hold if it is a pachycephalosaur. sent18: something is a luck if it is a kind of a pheromone. sent19: if the fact that the nutrient is not potent but diatomic is not correct then the Cartwright is potent. sent20: the stumpknocker is a kind of a pheromone and it is nonsyllabic. sent21: the reservist is not a Melopsittacus but it is a hurdles if the Cartwright does not toggle.
sent20 -> int1: the stumpknocker is a kind of a pheromone.;
the goblet either is a public or is a luck or both.
sent18 -> int2: the goblet is a luck if it is a pheromone.;
$hypothesis$ = the stumpknocker considers stumpknocker and/or is vegetal. ; $context$ = sent1: the stumpknocker is nonsyllabic. sent2: that the jetsam considers stumpknocker is correct. sent3: if the stumpknocker is a freedom but it is not vegetal then the copperware is vegetal. sent4: something is not a kind of a pheromone if it is not nonsyllabic and not a freedom. sent5: that the draft is a pheromone is not incorrect. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a modeling the Babylonian is not a kind of an ideal. sent7: something that is potent is not a kind of a toggle. sent8: that something considers stumpknocker or it is vegetal or both is wrong if it is not a kind of a pheromone. sent9: the stumpknocker is a pheromone and/or it does harshen Amur. sent10: something is nonsyllabic if it is vegetal. sent11: the stumpknocker is a kind of bacteriophagic thing that considers bulb. sent12: the teak is nonsyllabic. sent13: the stumpknocker is a dobra. sent14: if something is both not a Melopsittacus and a hurdles then the pianist models. sent15: something is not nonsyllabic and is not a freedom if it is not futuristic. sent16: the nutrient is a pachycephalosaur. sent17: the fact that the nutrient is not potent but it is diatomic does not hold if it is a pachycephalosaur. sent18: something is a luck if it is a kind of a pheromone. sent19: if the fact that the nutrient is not potent but diatomic is not correct then the Cartwright is potent. sent20: the stumpknocker is a kind of a pheromone and it is nonsyllabic. sent21: the reservist is not a Melopsittacus but it is a hurdles if the Cartwright does not toggle. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the stumpknocker is a kind of a pheromone.; __UNKNOWN__