something is not a pinochle.
sent1: if something is not facultative then the fact that it does not single Graz and is a kind of a gunite is not right. sent2: something is not a kind of a pinochle if the fact that it does not single Graz and is a gunite does not hold. sent3: the heliograph is not a Mackem if that the knackwurst is unresponsive and it is cryogenics does not hold. sent4: that the guacamole is a priapism and it is cryogenics is not correct. sent5: the balsam is not facultative if that it is a Mackem and a cubism does not hold. sent6: that the balsam is a Mackem and a cubism is incorrect if the heliograph is not a kind of a Mackem. sent7: the fact that something is humble and it strokes injection is not right if it is not a Mackem. sent8: there exists nothing such that that it is not responsive but cryogenics is not wrong.
sent8 -> int1: that the knackwurst is unresponsive and it is cryogenics is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the heliograph is not a Mackem.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that that the balsam is a Mackem and it is a cubism is correct is wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the balsam is not facultative.; sent1 -> int5: if the balsam is not facultative the fact that it does not single Graz and it is a gunite is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the balsam does not single Graz and is a gunite does not hold.; sent2 -> int7: if the fact that that the balsam does not single Graz but it is a gunite is not incorrect does not hold it is not a pinochle.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the balsam is not a kind of a pinochle.; int8 -> hypothesis;
that the runaway is humble and it does stroke injection is not true.
sent7 -> int9: the fact that the runaway humbles and it strokes injection is wrong if it is not a kind of a Mackem.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not a pinochle. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not facultative then the fact that it does not single Graz and is a kind of a gunite is not right. sent2: something is not a kind of a pinochle if the fact that it does not single Graz and is a gunite does not hold. sent3: the heliograph is not a Mackem if that the knackwurst is unresponsive and it is cryogenics does not hold. sent4: that the guacamole is a priapism and it is cryogenics is not correct. sent5: the balsam is not facultative if that it is a Mackem and a cubism does not hold. sent6: that the balsam is a Mackem and a cubism is incorrect if the heliograph is not a kind of a Mackem. sent7: the fact that something is humble and it strokes injection is not right if it is not a Mackem. sent8: there exists nothing such that that it is not responsive but cryogenics is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: that the knackwurst is unresponsive and it is cryogenics is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the heliograph is not a Mackem.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that that the balsam is a Mackem and it is a cubism is correct is wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the balsam is not facultative.; sent1 -> int5: if the balsam is not facultative the fact that it does not single Graz and it is a gunite is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the balsam does not single Graz and is a gunite does not hold.; sent2 -> int7: if the fact that that the balsam does not single Graz but it is a gunite is not incorrect does not hold it is not a pinochle.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the balsam is not a kind of a pinochle.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__