the fact that the section is a kind of a Farrell but it does not heap dink does not hold.
sent1: if something is not complex then the fact that it criticizes concurrence and is a kind of a cicero is incorrect. sent2: if something is both dormant and not indistinguishable that the tracheophyte is anemometric hold. sent3: if something is a kind of a PIE it is a Cornish and it does not lob porterage. sent4: if the section lobs catalectic then it does not heap dink. sent5: the section lobs threescore if the tracheophyte is anemometric. sent6: something does not criticize agronomy and does copy if it is apothegmatic. sent7: the section does not heap dink. sent8: the chalcedony is not non-dormant but it is not indistinguishable. sent9: the section is dormant and does not lob catalectic if it does heap dink. sent10: that something is a Farrell but it does not heap dink is incorrect if the fact that it is anemometric hold. sent11: something does lob threescore and it does lob catalectic if it is not a cicero. sent12: something is apothegmatic if it does lob seatbelt. sent13: if the tracheophyte lobs threescore then the section is anemometric. sent14: if the fact that something criticizes concurrence and is a cicero is false it is not a cicero. sent15: the pheno-safranine does lob seatbelt if there is something such that it is a kind of a Cornish and it does not lob porterage. sent16: something is a Crax and does pit hame. sent17: the corymb is a PIE and does capsize. sent18: if something does lob catalectic it is a kind of a Farrell and it does not heap dink. sent19: the chalcedony is dormant. sent20: something that does lob threescore does lob catalectic. sent21: something is anemometric but it does not lob threescore if it is dormant.
sent8 -> int1: there is something such that it is not non-dormant but distinguishable.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the tracheophyte is anemometric.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the section does lob threescore.; sent20 -> int4: the section does lob catalectic if it lobs threescore.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the section does lob catalectic.; sent18 -> int6: the section is a Farrell and does not heap dink if it lobs catalectic.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the section is a Farrell and does not heap dink is incorrect.
sent10 -> int7: if the section is anemometric that it is a Farrell and it does not heap dink is not right.; sent11 -> int8: if the tracheophyte is not a kind of a cicero it lobs threescore and lobs catalectic.; sent14 -> int9: if the fact that the tracheophyte does criticize concurrence and it is a cicero does not hold it is not a cicero.; sent1 -> int10: that the tracheophyte criticizes concurrence and is a cicero is not right if it is not a kind of a complex.; sent6 -> int11: the pheno-safranine does not criticize agronomy and does copy if it is apothegmatic.; sent12 -> int12: if the pheno-safranine does lob seatbelt it is apothegmatic.; sent3 -> int13: the corymb is a kind of a Cornish but it does not lob porterage if it is a PIE.; sent17 -> int14: the corymb is a PIE.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the corymb is a Cornish but it does not lob porterage.; int15 -> int16: something is a kind of a Cornish and does not lob porterage.; int16 & sent15 -> int17: the pheno-safranine lobs seatbelt.; int12 & int17 -> int18: the pheno-safranine is apothegmatic.; int11 & int18 -> int19: the pheno-safranine does not criticize agronomy and is a copying.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it does not criticize agronomy and it is a kind of a copying.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the section is a kind of a Farrell but it does not heap dink does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not complex then the fact that it criticizes concurrence and is a kind of a cicero is incorrect. sent2: if something is both dormant and not indistinguishable that the tracheophyte is anemometric hold. sent3: if something is a kind of a PIE it is a Cornish and it does not lob porterage. sent4: if the section lobs catalectic then it does not heap dink. sent5: the section lobs threescore if the tracheophyte is anemometric. sent6: something does not criticize agronomy and does copy if it is apothegmatic. sent7: the section does not heap dink. sent8: the chalcedony is not non-dormant but it is not indistinguishable. sent9: the section is dormant and does not lob catalectic if it does heap dink. sent10: that something is a Farrell but it does not heap dink is incorrect if the fact that it is anemometric hold. sent11: something does lob threescore and it does lob catalectic if it is not a cicero. sent12: something is apothegmatic if it does lob seatbelt. sent13: if the tracheophyte lobs threescore then the section is anemometric. sent14: if the fact that something criticizes concurrence and is a cicero is false it is not a cicero. sent15: the pheno-safranine does lob seatbelt if there is something such that it is a kind of a Cornish and it does not lob porterage. sent16: something is a Crax and does pit hame. sent17: the corymb is a PIE and does capsize. sent18: if something does lob catalectic it is a kind of a Farrell and it does not heap dink. sent19: the chalcedony is dormant. sent20: something that does lob threescore does lob catalectic. sent21: something is anemometric but it does not lob threescore if it is dormant. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: there is something such that it is not non-dormant but distinguishable.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the tracheophyte is anemometric.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the section does lob threescore.; sent20 -> int4: the section does lob catalectic if it lobs threescore.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the section does lob catalectic.; sent18 -> int6: the section is a Farrell and does not heap dink if it lobs catalectic.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__