the fact that the millet sojourns if the nip is a mainsail is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the millet is difficult and it dissembles ostinato is false if the crabs does not effect ribbonfish. sent2: there exists something such that it is not euphonic. sent3: the crabs does not effect ribbonfish if a non-euphonic thing is not a kind of a angioma. sent4: the fact that the nip does dissemble ostinato is right. sent5: the millet does sojourn if it is difficult. sent6: there is something such that it is not euphonic and it is a angioma. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a angioma. sent8: something is both euphonic and not a angioma. sent9: the nip is not euphonic. sent10: that the millet is difficult and it dissembles ostinato is not right. sent11: if the crabs does dissemble ostinato then it does not effect ribbonfish and it is not euphonic. sent12: if the fact that the crabs is not a mainsail but it is a contraband is wrong then the nip is not a contraband. sent13: if the fact that the millet is not euphonic but it dissembles ostinato is not right it is a angioma. sent14: the crabs is not a kind of a mainsail and it is not a kind of a angioma if it effects ribbonfish. sent15: the nip is not euphonic if it is a kind of a mainsail. sent16: if the nip is a mainsail then it is non-euphonic thing that is not a angioma. sent17: the nip is not difficult. sent18: the subaltern is a angioma. sent19: the Walloon is a angioma. sent20: if the millet does not effect ribbonfish the fact that the crabs is not a kind of a mainsail and is difficult is not correct. sent21: the fact that the millet is a kind of non-difficult thing that dissembles ostinato is not true if the crabs does not effect ribbonfish. sent22: the fact that something is not a mainsail and is a kind of a contraband is not correct if it does effect ribbonfish. sent23: the millet is a sojourn if that it is not difficult and it does dissemble ostinato does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nip is a mainsail.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the nip is not euphonic and it is not a kind of a angioma.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not euphonic and it is not a angioma.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the crabs does not effect ribbonfish.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the millet is not difficult and dissembles ostinato does not hold.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the millet is a sojourn.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the millet does not organize Jagannath but it is a contraband does not hold.
sent22 -> int6: if the crabs effects ribbonfish then the fact that it is both not a mainsail and a contraband does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the millet sojourns if the nip is a mainsail is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the millet is difficult and it dissembles ostinato is false if the crabs does not effect ribbonfish. sent2: there exists something such that it is not euphonic. sent3: the crabs does not effect ribbonfish if a non-euphonic thing is not a kind of a angioma. sent4: the fact that the nip does dissemble ostinato is right. sent5: the millet does sojourn if it is difficult. sent6: there is something such that it is not euphonic and it is a angioma. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a angioma. sent8: something is both euphonic and not a angioma. sent9: the nip is not euphonic. sent10: that the millet is difficult and it dissembles ostinato is not right. sent11: if the crabs does dissemble ostinato then it does not effect ribbonfish and it is not euphonic. sent12: if the fact that the crabs is not a mainsail but it is a contraband is wrong then the nip is not a contraband. sent13: if the fact that the millet is not euphonic but it dissembles ostinato is not right it is a angioma. sent14: the crabs is not a kind of a mainsail and it is not a kind of a angioma if it effects ribbonfish. sent15: the nip is not euphonic if it is a kind of a mainsail. sent16: if the nip is a mainsail then it is non-euphonic thing that is not a angioma. sent17: the nip is not difficult. sent18: the subaltern is a angioma. sent19: the Walloon is a angioma. sent20: if the millet does not effect ribbonfish the fact that the crabs is not a kind of a mainsail and is difficult is not correct. sent21: the fact that the millet is a kind of non-difficult thing that dissembles ostinato is not true if the crabs does not effect ribbonfish. sent22: the fact that something is not a mainsail and is a kind of a contraband is not correct if it does effect ribbonfish. sent23: the millet is a sojourn if that it is not difficult and it does dissemble ostinato does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nip is a mainsail.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the nip is not euphonic and it is not a kind of a angioma.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not euphonic and it is not a angioma.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the crabs does not effect ribbonfish.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the millet is not difficult and dissembles ostinato does not hold.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the millet is a sojourn.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__