that the heaping hike does not occur if the fact that the heaping Lepus but not the marbles occurs is incorrect is false.
sent1: that the heaping put-down happens and the twiddling does not occur does not hold. sent2: the pull happens. sent3: if the heaping sabbatia does not occur or the radiopacity does not occur or both then the heaping sabbatia does not occur. sent4: the inelegantness happens if the fact that that the belting does not occur and the inelegantness does not occur is wrong is not wrong. sent5: that the belting does not occur and the inelegantness does not occur is false if the criticizing cost does not occur. sent6: the stupefaction does not occur and the odorousness does not occur. sent7: that the criticizing opal happens hold if the fact that the marbles does not occur and the heaping Lepus occurs is not correct. sent8: if the inelegantness occurs then the heaping sabbatia occurs and/or the radiopacity does not occur. sent9: the marbles does not occur if that the pull occurs or the criticizing legalization happens or both is incorrect. sent10: the heaping hike does not occur if the heaping Lepus does not occur and the heaping sabbatia does not occur. sent11: that the resiling but not the myalgicness occurs results in that the criticizing Munchhausen does not occur. sent12: the criticizing cost does not occur. sent13: the marbles does not occur if the fact that either the pulling does not occur or the criticizing legalization occurs or both is false. sent14: that the pull does not occur or the criticizing legalization occurs or both does not hold. sent15: that the heaping sabbatia does not occur or that the radiopacity does not occur or both is caused by that the inelegantness happens.
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the marbling does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heaping Lepus happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the heaping Lepus but not the marbling occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that that the heaping Lepus but not the marbles happens is wrong is correct.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the heaping Lepus does not occur is not wrong.; sent5 & sent12 -> int5: that the belt does not occur and the inelegantness does not occur is false.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the inelegantness happens.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the heaping sabbatia does not occur and/or the radiopacity does not occur.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the heaping sabbatia does not occur.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the heaping Lepus does not occur and the heaping sabbatia does not occur.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the heaping hike does not occur.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the criticizing opal occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the heaping hike does not occur if the fact that the heaping Lepus but not the marbles occurs is incorrect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the heaping put-down happens and the twiddling does not occur does not hold. sent2: the pull happens. sent3: if the heaping sabbatia does not occur or the radiopacity does not occur or both then the heaping sabbatia does not occur. sent4: the inelegantness happens if the fact that that the belting does not occur and the inelegantness does not occur is wrong is not wrong. sent5: that the belting does not occur and the inelegantness does not occur is false if the criticizing cost does not occur. sent6: the stupefaction does not occur and the odorousness does not occur. sent7: that the criticizing opal happens hold if the fact that the marbles does not occur and the heaping Lepus occurs is not correct. sent8: if the inelegantness occurs then the heaping sabbatia occurs and/or the radiopacity does not occur. sent9: the marbles does not occur if that the pull occurs or the criticizing legalization happens or both is incorrect. sent10: the heaping hike does not occur if the heaping Lepus does not occur and the heaping sabbatia does not occur. sent11: that the resiling but not the myalgicness occurs results in that the criticizing Munchhausen does not occur. sent12: the criticizing cost does not occur. sent13: the marbles does not occur if the fact that either the pulling does not occur or the criticizing legalization occurs or both is false. sent14: that the pull does not occur or the criticizing legalization occurs or both does not hold. sent15: that the heaping sabbatia does not occur or that the radiopacity does not occur or both is caused by that the inelegantness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the marbling does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heaping Lepus happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the heaping Lepus but not the marbling occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that that the heaping Lepus but not the marbles happens is wrong is correct.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the heaping Lepus does not occur is not wrong.; sent5 & sent12 -> int5: that the belt does not occur and the inelegantness does not occur is false.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the inelegantness happens.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the heaping sabbatia does not occur and/or the radiopacity does not occur.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the heaping sabbatia does not occur.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the heaping Lepus does not occur and the heaping sabbatia does not occur.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the heaping hike does not occur.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__