the aeration is non-absent thing that is not inattentive.
sent1: something is not incalculable if it is not atherosclerotic and is peaty. sent2: if the aeration is peaty the twinkler is not atherosclerotic but it is incalculable. sent3: the twinkler is a xenotransplant. sent4: something is not peaty but it is a kind of a downtown if it does not theme. sent5: that the acetyl is not a kind of a downtown is correct. sent6: if the twinkler is not peaty that the aeration does not absent and it is not inattentive does not hold. sent7: the aeration does not absent and is not inattentive if it is not peaty. sent8: the twinkler is a downtown. sent9: the buttercrunch is not inattentive. sent10: a non-atherosclerotic and incalculable thing is not a kind of a downtown. sent11: the aeration is not atherosclerotic. sent12: the twinkler is inattentive. sent13: the aeration is not an amphitheater and it is not a registrant. sent14: if something does not steel stain the fact that it does fear high-low-jack and is a kind of a slacker is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aeration is peaty.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the twinkler is not atherosclerotic but incalculable.; sent10 -> int2: the twinkler is not a kind of a downtown if it is not atherosclerotic and it is incalculable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the twinkler is not a downtown.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the aeration is not peaty.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the aeration is a kind of non-absent thing that is not inattentive does not hold.
sent4 -> int6: the twinkler is not peaty and is a downtown if it does not theme.; sent14 -> int7: if the oceanographer does not steel stain the fact that it fears high-low-jack and is a slacker is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the aeration is non-absent thing that is not inattentive. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not incalculable if it is not atherosclerotic and is peaty. sent2: if the aeration is peaty the twinkler is not atherosclerotic but it is incalculable. sent3: the twinkler is a xenotransplant. sent4: something is not peaty but it is a kind of a downtown if it does not theme. sent5: that the acetyl is not a kind of a downtown is correct. sent6: if the twinkler is not peaty that the aeration does not absent and it is not inattentive does not hold. sent7: the aeration does not absent and is not inattentive if it is not peaty. sent8: the twinkler is a downtown. sent9: the buttercrunch is not inattentive. sent10: a non-atherosclerotic and incalculable thing is not a kind of a downtown. sent11: the aeration is not atherosclerotic. sent12: the twinkler is inattentive. sent13: the aeration is not an amphitheater and it is not a registrant. sent14: if something does not steel stain the fact that it does fear high-low-jack and is a kind of a slacker is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aeration is peaty.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the twinkler is not atherosclerotic but incalculable.; sent10 -> int2: the twinkler is not a kind of a downtown if it is not atherosclerotic and it is incalculable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the twinkler is not a downtown.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the aeration is not peaty.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__