the fact that the dockside is pugilistic but it is not phrenological is not true.
sent1: if there is something such that it does not drink trillion then that the dockside capsizes and is homozygous does not hold. sent2: that the dockside is a kind of pugilistic thing that is phrenological is not right. sent3: a microelectronics thing is homozygous. sent4: something is non-homozygous if that it capsizes and is non-homozygous is not true. sent5: something does not drink trillion. sent6: if the dockside is pugilistic and is phrenological then it is microelectronics. sent7: the tequila is a kind of a leach if it does drink dockside. sent8: the dockside is not non-microelectronics if it is pugilistic and not phrenological.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dockside is not non-pugilistic and not phrenological.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the dockside is microelectronics.; sent3 -> int2: if the dockside is microelectronics it is homozygous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dockside is homozygous.; sent4 -> int4: if that the dockside capsizes and is homozygous is not true it is not homozygous.; sent5 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the dockside does capsize and is homozygous does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the dockside is not homozygous.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dockside is pugilistic but it is not phrenological is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does not drink trillion then that the dockside capsizes and is homozygous does not hold. sent2: that the dockside is a kind of pugilistic thing that is phrenological is not right. sent3: a microelectronics thing is homozygous. sent4: something is non-homozygous if that it capsizes and is non-homozygous is not true. sent5: something does not drink trillion. sent6: if the dockside is pugilistic and is phrenological then it is microelectronics. sent7: the tequila is a kind of a leach if it does drink dockside. sent8: the dockside is not non-microelectronics if it is pugilistic and not phrenological. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dockside is not non-pugilistic and not phrenological.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the dockside is microelectronics.; sent3 -> int2: if the dockside is microelectronics it is homozygous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dockside is homozygous.; sent4 -> int4: if that the dockside capsizes and is homozygous is not true it is not homozygous.; sent5 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the dockside does capsize and is homozygous does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the dockside is not homozygous.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__