the fact that if the fact that the chocking chronology occurs hold that the blood does not occur and the agrologicness happens is false does not hold.
sent1: the driving occurs. sent2: the gradualness happens. sent3: the Bahraini but not the retinalness happens if the fleshing encasement occurs. sent4: not the blooding but the agrologicness happens. sent5: the mythologizing Psittacus does not occur if the nay happens and the candlelight happens. sent6: if that the nomination does not occur is correct that the blooding and the agrologicness occurs is not correct. sent7: that the blooding and the agrologicness occurs is not correct. sent8: if both the final and the canalicularness happens then the subdividing happens. sent9: the valvularness does not occur. sent10: that both the fleshing encasement and the piece occurs is not true. sent11: the blooding does not occur but the agrologicness happens if that the chocking chronology happens is not false. sent12: that the nomination does not occur results in that not the blooding but the agrologicness happens. sent13: the spitting does not occur. sent14: the fitted occurs and the pyrecticness occurs. sent15: the fact that the fleshing encasement does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the fleshing encasement occurs and the piecing happens is not correct. sent16: the final does not occur and the canalicularness happens. sent17: the teeoff occurs. sent18: if the phototherapy occurs and the bounce happens the hurricane does not occur. sent19: the contortion occurs but the levanter does not occur. sent20: that the cretaceousness does not occur hold. sent21: if the subdividing but not the fleshing encasement happens the amnioticness happens. sent22: that not the blood but the agrologicness occurs is false if the nomination does not occur. sent23: if the chocking chronology happens then the fact that the blood happens and the agrologicness occurs is wrong. sent24: the final does not occur. sent25: the subdividing is caused by that the final does not occur and the canalicularness happens. sent26: that both the amnioticness and the chocking chronology happens prevents that the nomination occurs.
sent25 & sent16 -> int1: the subdividing occurs.; sent15 & sent10 -> int2: the fleshing encasement does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the subdividing happens and the fleshing encasement does not occur.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the amnioticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chocking chronology occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the amnioticness and the chocking chronology occurs.; int5 & sent26 -> int6: the nomination does not occur.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: that not the blood but the agrologicness happens is not correct.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Bahraininess happens but the retinalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fact that the chocking chronology occurs hold that the blood does not occur and the agrologicness happens is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the driving occurs. sent2: the gradualness happens. sent3: the Bahraini but not the retinalness happens if the fleshing encasement occurs. sent4: not the blooding but the agrologicness happens. sent5: the mythologizing Psittacus does not occur if the nay happens and the candlelight happens. sent6: if that the nomination does not occur is correct that the blooding and the agrologicness occurs is not correct. sent7: that the blooding and the agrologicness occurs is not correct. sent8: if both the final and the canalicularness happens then the subdividing happens. sent9: the valvularness does not occur. sent10: that both the fleshing encasement and the piece occurs is not true. sent11: the blooding does not occur but the agrologicness happens if that the chocking chronology happens is not false. sent12: that the nomination does not occur results in that not the blooding but the agrologicness happens. sent13: the spitting does not occur. sent14: the fitted occurs and the pyrecticness occurs. sent15: the fact that the fleshing encasement does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the fleshing encasement occurs and the piecing happens is not correct. sent16: the final does not occur and the canalicularness happens. sent17: the teeoff occurs. sent18: if the phototherapy occurs and the bounce happens the hurricane does not occur. sent19: the contortion occurs but the levanter does not occur. sent20: that the cretaceousness does not occur hold. sent21: if the subdividing but not the fleshing encasement happens the amnioticness happens. sent22: that not the blood but the agrologicness occurs is false if the nomination does not occur. sent23: if the chocking chronology happens then the fact that the blood happens and the agrologicness occurs is wrong. sent24: the final does not occur. sent25: the subdividing is caused by that the final does not occur and the canalicularness happens. sent26: that both the amnioticness and the chocking chronology happens prevents that the nomination occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 & sent16 -> int1: the subdividing occurs.; sent15 & sent10 -> int2: the fleshing encasement does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the subdividing happens and the fleshing encasement does not occur.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the amnioticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chocking chronology occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the amnioticness and the chocking chronology occurs.; int5 & sent26 -> int6: the nomination does not occur.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: that not the blood but the agrologicness happens is not correct.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__