that the ounce is not a quibble and not syncarpous is wrong.
sent1: if something is not cordless then it is not a quibble. sent2: if the goldfish is not a quibble that the ounce does quibble but it is not syncarpous does not hold. sent3: if that something is both disorderly and cordless is not true it does not quibble. sent4: there is something such that it is a wink. sent5: if the fact that something is cordless and it is not orderly is not correct it is not syncarpous. sent6: the fact that the ounce is not a kind of a quibble and is not syncarpous is wrong if the goldfish does not quibble. sent7: if the ounce does not quibble the fact that the goldfish is both not a quibble and syncarpous is wrong. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it does wink is not incorrect then that that the goldfish is disorderly and cordless is incorrect is correct. sent9: something does not quibble and is not syncarpous if it winks.
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: that the fact that the goldfish is disorderly and it is cordless is not correct is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: the goldfish is not a quibble if the fact that it is disorderly and it is cordless is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the goldfish is not a quibble is right.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the ounce is not a kind of a quibble and it is not syncarpous.
sent9 -> int4: the ounce is both not a quibble and not syncarpous if it winks.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ounce is not a quibble and not syncarpous is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not cordless then it is not a quibble. sent2: if the goldfish is not a quibble that the ounce does quibble but it is not syncarpous does not hold. sent3: if that something is both disorderly and cordless is not true it does not quibble. sent4: there is something such that it is a wink. sent5: if the fact that something is cordless and it is not orderly is not correct it is not syncarpous. sent6: the fact that the ounce is not a kind of a quibble and is not syncarpous is wrong if the goldfish does not quibble. sent7: if the ounce does not quibble the fact that the goldfish is both not a quibble and syncarpous is wrong. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it does wink is not incorrect then that that the goldfish is disorderly and cordless is incorrect is correct. sent9: something does not quibble and is not syncarpous if it winks. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: that the fact that the goldfish is disorderly and it is cordless is not correct is not incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: the goldfish is not a quibble if the fact that it is disorderly and it is cordless is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the goldfish is not a quibble is right.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__