the youth-on-age is not a kind of a ding but it is rhetorical.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is chondritic or it is not residual or both does not hold. sent2: the fact that there is something such that that it is either non-chondritic or not a residual or both does not hold is right. sent3: something does not tunnel plectognath if it is a ding that is a kind of a Aepyornidae. sent4: there is something such that that it is not chondritic or is a residual or both does not hold. sent5: something is a residual. sent6: the youth-on-age does unpick regress and is rhetorical. sent7: the plectognath does tunnel plectognath but it is not a Walloon. sent8: the fact that the plectognath does tunnel plectognath and it is a Walloon does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it is chondritic. sent10: there exists something such that it is not chondritic and/or it is not residual. sent11: the fact that the plectognath tunnels plectognath and is not a Walloon is not right if that the youth-on-age does not tunnels plectognath is not wrong. sent12: the plectognath is not a Walloon. sent13: if the youth-on-age does not tunnel plectognath then the fact that the plectognath tunnel plectognath and it is a Walloon is not true. sent14: the youth-on-age is a Aepyornidae if it is a Styron. sent15: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it either is not chondritic or is not a residual or both is false then the fact that the youth-on-age does not tunnel oligospermia is not false hold. sent16: the youth-on-age does unpick regress.
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the youth-on-age does not tunnel oligospermia.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the youth-on-age is a kind of a ding.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that if the youth-on-age is a ding and is the Aepyornidae then the youth-on-age does not tunnel plectognath is correct.; sent6 -> int3: the youth-on-age is rhetorical.;
$hypothesis$ = the youth-on-age is not a kind of a ding but it is rhetorical. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is chondritic or it is not residual or both does not hold. sent2: the fact that there is something such that that it is either non-chondritic or not a residual or both does not hold is right. sent3: something does not tunnel plectognath if it is a ding that is a kind of a Aepyornidae. sent4: there is something such that that it is not chondritic or is a residual or both does not hold. sent5: something is a residual. sent6: the youth-on-age does unpick regress and is rhetorical. sent7: the plectognath does tunnel plectognath but it is not a Walloon. sent8: the fact that the plectognath does tunnel plectognath and it is a Walloon does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that it is chondritic. sent10: there exists something such that it is not chondritic and/or it is not residual. sent11: the fact that the plectognath tunnels plectognath and is not a Walloon is not right if that the youth-on-age does not tunnels plectognath is not wrong. sent12: the plectognath is not a Walloon. sent13: if the youth-on-age does not tunnel plectognath then the fact that the plectognath tunnel plectognath and it is a Walloon is not true. sent14: the youth-on-age is a Aepyornidae if it is a Styron. sent15: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it either is not chondritic or is not a residual or both is false then the fact that the youth-on-age does not tunnel oligospermia is not false hold. sent16: the youth-on-age does unpick regress. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the youth-on-age does not tunnel oligospermia.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the youth-on-age is a kind of a ding.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that if the youth-on-age is a ding and is the Aepyornidae then the youth-on-age does not tunnel plectognath is correct.; sent6 -> int3: the youth-on-age is rhetorical.; __UNKNOWN__