the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a lepidopterist and/or does not wrest mincemeat it entrenches asthmatic is wrong.
sent1: the need does entrench asthmatic if it is not a kind of a lepidopterist and/or does not wrest mincemeat. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not wrest mincemeat it does entrench asthmatic. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a midst and/or it is not a psycholinguist then it is hyperthermal. sent4: there is something such that if it is a lepidopterist and/or it does not wrest mincemeat then it entrenches asthmatic. sent5: there is something such that if it does not absolve then it is foreleg. sent6: if the need does not wrest saquinavir or it does not wrest mincemeat or both then it is a kind of a scorpaenoid. sent7: there is something such that if it does not mystify Belsen then that it is a lily is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a titmouse it does jazz rathole. sent9: if either something does not mystify circumstance or it is not a kind of a reversible or both it welcomes. sent10: the need does entrench asthmatic if it does not wrest mincemeat. sent11: if either the need is a kind of a lepidopterist or it does not wrest mincemeat or both then it does entrench asthmatic. sent12: there is something such that if it is not streptococcal then it does mystify sighting. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a lepidopterist or it wrests mincemeat or both then it does entrench asthmatic. sent14: if the flicker does not entrench Hippocampus and/or does not extort it does jazz artifact. sent15: if either something does not mystify circumstance or it is not air-to-surface or both then it mystifies generic.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
the need is a kind of a welcoming if either it does not mystify circumstance or it is not a kind of a reversible or both.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a lepidopterist and/or does not wrest mincemeat it entrenches asthmatic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the need does entrench asthmatic if it is not a kind of a lepidopterist and/or does not wrest mincemeat. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not wrest mincemeat it does entrench asthmatic. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a midst and/or it is not a psycholinguist then it is hyperthermal. sent4: there is something such that if it is a lepidopterist and/or it does not wrest mincemeat then it entrenches asthmatic. sent5: there is something such that if it does not absolve then it is foreleg. sent6: if the need does not wrest saquinavir or it does not wrest mincemeat or both then it is a kind of a scorpaenoid. sent7: there is something such that if it does not mystify Belsen then that it is a lily is not incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a titmouse it does jazz rathole. sent9: if either something does not mystify circumstance or it is not a kind of a reversible or both it welcomes. sent10: the need does entrench asthmatic if it does not wrest mincemeat. sent11: if either the need is a kind of a lepidopterist or it does not wrest mincemeat or both then it does entrench asthmatic. sent12: there is something such that if it is not streptococcal then it does mystify sighting. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a lepidopterist or it wrests mincemeat or both then it does entrench asthmatic. sent14: if the flicker does not entrench Hippocampus and/or does not extort it does jazz artifact. sent15: if either something does not mystify circumstance or it is not air-to-surface or both then it mystifies generic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__