the repining axil does not occur.
sent1: that the repining axil occurs hold if that the anemicness but not the Vedicness happens is incorrect. sent2: the centering but not the confusing personification occurs. sent3: the ineradicableness occurs. sent4: the confusing Apium happens. sent5: the corrupting happens. sent6: the repining Seward happens. sent7: if the confusing Connarus happens then the bibliophilicness happens. sent8: the fact that the repining fermium occurs and the retorting occurs is incorrect. sent9: that the repining incurable does not occur and the corrupting happens is triggered by that the confusing Apium occurs. sent10: the corrupting happens if the confusing Apium occurs. sent11: if the confusing Webb occurs then that the non-invulnerableness and the fragrantness happens does not hold. sent12: that the repining incurable does not occur but the corruptingness happens does not hold if the anemicness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anemicness occurs and the Vedicness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the anemicness occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that not the repining incurable but the corruptingness happens is not right.; sent9 & sent4 -> int3: not the repining incurable but the corruptingness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the anemicness and the non-Vedicness occurs is not true.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the repining axil does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the repining axil occurs hold if that the anemicness but not the Vedicness happens is incorrect. sent2: the centering but not the confusing personification occurs. sent3: the ineradicableness occurs. sent4: the confusing Apium happens. sent5: the corrupting happens. sent6: the repining Seward happens. sent7: if the confusing Connarus happens then the bibliophilicness happens. sent8: the fact that the repining fermium occurs and the retorting occurs is incorrect. sent9: that the repining incurable does not occur and the corrupting happens is triggered by that the confusing Apium occurs. sent10: the corrupting happens if the confusing Apium occurs. sent11: if the confusing Webb occurs then that the non-invulnerableness and the fragrantness happens does not hold. sent12: that the repining incurable does not occur but the corruptingness happens does not hold if the anemicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anemicness occurs and the Vedicness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the anemicness occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that not the repining incurable but the corruptingness happens is not right.; sent9 & sent4 -> int3: not the repining incurable but the corruptingness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the anemicness and the non-Vedicness occurs is not true.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__