if the juke does not occur that the sonneting but not the caliconess occurs does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the hunch but not the cereal happens is not right. sent2: the fact that the prefiguring but not the antecedentness happens is incorrect if the mush does not occur. sent3: the fact that the peasanthood occurs and the relief does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the deflating loofah and the non-percussiveness occurs is not correct. sent5: that both the sonnet and the calico occurs is not true. sent6: if the Audenesqueness does not occur then that the fact that both the sonneting and the calico occurs hold is incorrect. sent7: both the sonneting and the non-caliconess occurs if the Audenesqueness does not occur. sent8: both the sonneting and the non-caliconess happens if the juke does not occur. sent9: if the juke happens then the fact that both the sonnet and the non-caliconess happens is wrong. sent10: if the juke does not occur then the fact that both the sonneting and the caliconess occurs is not correct. sent11: the coloring does not occur. sent12: the anestrousness happens if the spiraling Cicindelidae happens. sent13: the cereal occurs. sent14: that the squeegee does not occur is caused by that the Audenesqueness does not occur but the juke happens. sent15: the juke happens if the Audenesqueness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Audenesqueness occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the juke occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the juke does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Audenesqueness does not occur.;
the squeegee does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the juke does not occur that the sonneting but not the caliconess occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hunch but not the cereal happens is not right. sent2: the fact that the prefiguring but not the antecedentness happens is incorrect if the mush does not occur. sent3: the fact that the peasanthood occurs and the relief does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the deflating loofah and the non-percussiveness occurs is not correct. sent5: that both the sonnet and the calico occurs is not true. sent6: if the Audenesqueness does not occur then that the fact that both the sonneting and the calico occurs hold is incorrect. sent7: both the sonneting and the non-caliconess occurs if the Audenesqueness does not occur. sent8: both the sonneting and the non-caliconess happens if the juke does not occur. sent9: if the juke happens then the fact that both the sonnet and the non-caliconess happens is wrong. sent10: if the juke does not occur then the fact that both the sonneting and the caliconess occurs is not correct. sent11: the coloring does not occur. sent12: the anestrousness happens if the spiraling Cicindelidae happens. sent13: the cereal occurs. sent14: that the squeegee does not occur is caused by that the Audenesqueness does not occur but the juke happens. sent15: the juke happens if the Audenesqueness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Audenesqueness occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the juke occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the juke does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Audenesqueness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__