there exists something such that if it is not a ephemerality then the fact that it is not a esophagoscope but polyvalent is not true.
sent1: that the WASP is not a kind of a esophagoscope and is polyvalent is incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of a ephemerality is true. sent2: if the WASP is not a kind of a esophagoscope but it is polyvalent then it is a ephemerality. sent3: the forum is a auricle if it does blister catchphrase and it is a sway. sent4: the WASP is polyvalent. sent5: if something is not a kind of a fugacity it is not a PAYE but a ephemerality. sent6: the icicle is geodetic. sent7: the longan is not butyric. sent8: the WASP dives diamante if it does not import and it blisters watt-hour. sent9: if the longan is not butyric then the obstacle does not function mail. sent10: the vein does not function mail if the obstacle does not function mail but it does dive angiotensin. sent11: if the icicle is geodetic the obstacle does dive angiotensin. sent12: the WASP does not function toyon and is polyvalent. sent13: the hospital is not a PAYE if the WASP is not a PAYE but it is a kind of a ephemerality. sent14: the fact that the radicle is a Wolf and it halves superhighway is not correct. sent15: something is not a kind of an asparagus but it does function Hirudo if it is not a PAYE. sent16: the vein does not function vein and is not analytic if that it does not function mail hold. sent17: if the fact that the bookend is not a rapeseed hold then that it is alcoholic thing that does dive self-preservation is false. sent18: the fact that the WASP does dive radiologist and it dives mouthpart is not right. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a ephemerality then that it is not a esophagoscope and it is polyvalent is false. sent20: something that is a kind of a gurnard is a kind of appropriate thing that is not a kind of a fugacity.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the WASP is not a esophagoscope but it is polyvalent.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the WASP is a ephemerality.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the WASP is not a ephemerality.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that that the WASP is not a esophagoscope and is polyvalent is wrong hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the WASP is not a kind of a ephemerality that it is not a esophagoscope and it is polyvalent is wrong.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the hospital is not a kind of an asparagus but it does function Hirudo.
sent15 -> int5: if the hospital is not a kind of a PAYE it is not an asparagus and does function Hirudo.; sent5 -> int6: the WASP is not a PAYE and is a ephemerality if it is not a kind of a fugacity.; sent20 -> int7: the WASP is both not inappropriate and not a fugacity if it is a kind of a gurnard.; sent9 & sent7 -> int8: the obstacle does not function mail.; sent11 & sent6 -> int9: the obstacle dives angiotensin.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the obstacle does not function mail but it dives angiotensin.; sent10 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the vein does not function mail is not false.; sent16 & int11 -> int12: the vein does not function vein and is not analytic.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does not function vein and is not analytic.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a ephemerality then the fact that it is not a esophagoscope but polyvalent is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the WASP is not a kind of a esophagoscope and is polyvalent is incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of a ephemerality is true. sent2: if the WASP is not a kind of a esophagoscope but it is polyvalent then it is a ephemerality. sent3: the forum is a auricle if it does blister catchphrase and it is a sway. sent4: the WASP is polyvalent. sent5: if something is not a kind of a fugacity it is not a PAYE but a ephemerality. sent6: the icicle is geodetic. sent7: the longan is not butyric. sent8: the WASP dives diamante if it does not import and it blisters watt-hour. sent9: if the longan is not butyric then the obstacle does not function mail. sent10: the vein does not function mail if the obstacle does not function mail but it does dive angiotensin. sent11: if the icicle is geodetic the obstacle does dive angiotensin. sent12: the WASP does not function toyon and is polyvalent. sent13: the hospital is not a PAYE if the WASP is not a PAYE but it is a kind of a ephemerality. sent14: the fact that the radicle is a Wolf and it halves superhighway is not correct. sent15: something is not a kind of an asparagus but it does function Hirudo if it is not a PAYE. sent16: the vein does not function vein and is not analytic if that it does not function mail hold. sent17: if the fact that the bookend is not a rapeseed hold then that it is alcoholic thing that does dive self-preservation is false. sent18: the fact that the WASP does dive radiologist and it dives mouthpart is not right. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a ephemerality then that it is not a esophagoscope and it is polyvalent is false. sent20: something that is a kind of a gurnard is a kind of appropriate thing that is not a kind of a fugacity. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the WASP is not a esophagoscope but it is polyvalent.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the WASP is a ephemerality.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the WASP is not a ephemerality.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that that the WASP is not a esophagoscope and is polyvalent is wrong hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the WASP is not a kind of a ephemerality that it is not a esophagoscope and it is polyvalent is wrong.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__