that the autobahn is not an acrobat but inaccessible is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the gravity-assist is non-angelic thing that is not a pedal is incorrect. sent2: the pan does salt capstan if the fact that the gravity-assist is not angelic and it does not pedal is wrong. sent3: the autobahn is inaccessible if the pan salts capstan. sent4: something is not an acrobat if that it is efficacious and an acrobat does not hold. sent5: the fact that the autobahn is both efficacious and an acrobat is not true.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the pan salts capstan.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the autobahn is inaccessible.; sent4 -> int3: if the fact that the autobahn is not inefficacious but it is an acrobat is not true it is not a kind of an acrobat.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the autobahn is not an acrobat.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the autobahn is not an acrobat but inaccessible is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gravity-assist is non-angelic thing that is not a pedal is incorrect. sent2: the pan does salt capstan if the fact that the gravity-assist is not angelic and it does not pedal is wrong. sent3: the autobahn is inaccessible if the pan salts capstan. sent4: something is not an acrobat if that it is efficacious and an acrobat does not hold. sent5: the fact that the autobahn is both efficacious and an acrobat is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the pan salts capstan.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the autobahn is inaccessible.; sent4 -> int3: if the fact that the autobahn is not inefficacious but it is an acrobat is not true it is not a kind of an acrobat.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the autobahn is not an acrobat.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__