the clapping levanter does not occur.
sent1: that both the disguising auspiciousness and the disguising bunt happens is not true if the julienning stop does not occur. sent2: if that the anacoluthicness does not occur and the decontamination happens is not right then the pureness does not occur. sent3: that the gastrectomy occurs is caused by that the Scrabble occurs. sent4: the clapping levanter does not occur if both the hypothermicness and the gastrectomy occurs. sent5: the non-Masoreticness and the ban occurs if the aspirating does not occur. sent6: if the anacoluthicness happens then that not the Exodus but the decontamination occurs is not true. sent7: if that both the non-Romansness and the non-sacerdotalness happens is not right then the exhibit occurs. sent8: that the hypothermicness occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the romaicness happens hold. sent9: the disguising bunt does not occur and the julienning stop does not occur. sent10: the julienning stop does not occur if the fact that the ban happens is true. sent11: the fact that both the pureness and the ban occurs is right. sent12: if the fact that the delight does not occur and the clapping SIGINT does not occur does not hold then the fact that the aspirate does not occur is true. sent13: that the Exodus happens is caused by that the romaicness does not occur and the trampling does not occur. sent14: both the Scrabble and the disguising auspiciousness happens if the disguising bunt does not occur. sent15: the fact that the fact that the diocesan does not occur and the headship does not occur is right is wrong. sent16: if the blaspheming happens that the delight does not occur and the clapping SIGINT does not occur is incorrect. sent17: that the romaicness does not occur is true. sent18: if the fact that not the Exodus but the decontamination occurs is not correct the clapping levanter happens. sent19: the fact that the non-anacoluthicness and the decontamination happens is not true if the Exodus occurs. sent20: if that the romaicness does not occur and the trampling does not occur is not correct that the hypothermicness happens is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the romaicness does not occur and the trample does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Exodus occurs.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the non-anacoluthicness and the decontamination happens does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the pureness does not occur.; sent11 -> int4: the pureness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the romaicness does not occur and the trampling does not occur is wrong.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the hypothermicness occurs.; sent9 -> int8: the disguising bunt does not occur.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the Scrabble and the disguising auspiciousness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the Scrabble happens.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the gastrectomy happens.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the hypothermicness happens and the gastrectomy occurs.; int12 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the clapping levanter occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the clapping levanter does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the disguising auspiciousness and the disguising bunt happens is not true if the julienning stop does not occur. sent2: if that the anacoluthicness does not occur and the decontamination happens is not right then the pureness does not occur. sent3: that the gastrectomy occurs is caused by that the Scrabble occurs. sent4: the clapping levanter does not occur if both the hypothermicness and the gastrectomy occurs. sent5: the non-Masoreticness and the ban occurs if the aspirating does not occur. sent6: if the anacoluthicness happens then that not the Exodus but the decontamination occurs is not true. sent7: if that both the non-Romansness and the non-sacerdotalness happens is not right then the exhibit occurs. sent8: that the hypothermicness occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the romaicness happens hold. sent9: the disguising bunt does not occur and the julienning stop does not occur. sent10: the julienning stop does not occur if the fact that the ban happens is true. sent11: the fact that both the pureness and the ban occurs is right. sent12: if the fact that the delight does not occur and the clapping SIGINT does not occur does not hold then the fact that the aspirate does not occur is true. sent13: that the Exodus happens is caused by that the romaicness does not occur and the trampling does not occur. sent14: both the Scrabble and the disguising auspiciousness happens if the disguising bunt does not occur. sent15: the fact that the fact that the diocesan does not occur and the headship does not occur is right is wrong. sent16: if the blaspheming happens that the delight does not occur and the clapping SIGINT does not occur is incorrect. sent17: that the romaicness does not occur is true. sent18: if the fact that not the Exodus but the decontamination occurs is not correct the clapping levanter happens. sent19: the fact that the non-anacoluthicness and the decontamination happens is not true if the Exodus occurs. sent20: if that the romaicness does not occur and the trampling does not occur is not correct that the hypothermicness happens is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the romaicness does not occur and the trample does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Exodus occurs.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the fact that the non-anacoluthicness and the decontamination happens does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the pureness does not occur.; sent11 -> int4: the pureness occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the romaicness does not occur and the trampling does not occur is wrong.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the hypothermicness occurs.; sent9 -> int8: the disguising bunt does not occur.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the Scrabble and the disguising auspiciousness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the Scrabble happens.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the gastrectomy happens.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the hypothermicness happens and the gastrectomy occurs.; int12 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__