the fact that if the fact that the clotheshorse is not a Crown hold the fact that the backwater is a kind of a reciprocal but it is not an affectation is not right does not hold.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a Crown then it is not a acclimatization and is a acceptation. sent2: something is a backhoe if that it is not a acclimatization and it is a acceptation hold. sent3: the spectrograph is not an affectation. sent4: that the backwater is a kind of a reciprocal and it is an affectation is incorrect. sent5: if the spectrograph is expansionist then the fact that the backwater is reciprocal thing that is not an affectation does not hold. sent6: something is not an affectation and is a Cornwall if it is not a Crown. sent7: if something adjoins concatenation then it is a backhoe. sent8: if the clotheshorse is a backhoe the spectrograph does not adjoin concatenation. sent9: the fact that the spectrograph is not a kind of a Crown is not false if the backwater is a backhoe. sent10: the subtilin is not a Crown if the spectrograph is not a kind of a Crown. sent11: something is expansionist if it does not adjoin concatenation. sent12: if something is not a Crown then it is not a acclimatization. sent13: the backwater is a reciprocal that is not an affectation.
sent1 -> int1: if the clotheshorse is not a kind of a Crown then it is not a acclimatization and is a acceptation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clotheshorse is not a Crown.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the clotheshorse is not a acclimatization and is a acceptation.; sent2 -> int3: if the clotheshorse is not a kind of a acclimatization but it is a kind of a acceptation it is a backhoe.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the clotheshorse is a backhoe.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the spectrograph does not adjoin concatenation.; sent11 -> int6: if that the spectrograph does not adjoin concatenation hold it is expansionist.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the spectrograph is expansionist is true.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: that the fact that the backwater is a reciprocal but it is not an affectation is not wrong is false.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the subtilin is not an affectation and is a Cornwall.
sent6 -> int9: if the subtilin is not a Crown then it is not an affectation and it is a kind of a Cornwall.; sent7 -> int10: the backwater is a backhoe if it adjoins concatenation.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fact that the clotheshorse is not a Crown hold the fact that the backwater is a kind of a reciprocal but it is not an affectation is not right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a Crown then it is not a acclimatization and is a acceptation. sent2: something is a backhoe if that it is not a acclimatization and it is a acceptation hold. sent3: the spectrograph is not an affectation. sent4: that the backwater is a kind of a reciprocal and it is an affectation is incorrect. sent5: if the spectrograph is expansionist then the fact that the backwater is reciprocal thing that is not an affectation does not hold. sent6: something is not an affectation and is a Cornwall if it is not a Crown. sent7: if something adjoins concatenation then it is a backhoe. sent8: if the clotheshorse is a backhoe the spectrograph does not adjoin concatenation. sent9: the fact that the spectrograph is not a kind of a Crown is not false if the backwater is a backhoe. sent10: the subtilin is not a Crown if the spectrograph is not a kind of a Crown. sent11: something is expansionist if it does not adjoin concatenation. sent12: if something is not a Crown then it is not a acclimatization. sent13: the backwater is a reciprocal that is not an affectation. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the clotheshorse is not a kind of a Crown then it is not a acclimatization and is a acceptation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clotheshorse is not a Crown.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the clotheshorse is not a acclimatization and is a acceptation.; sent2 -> int3: if the clotheshorse is not a kind of a acclimatization but it is a kind of a acceptation it is a backhoe.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the clotheshorse is a backhoe.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the spectrograph does not adjoin concatenation.; sent11 -> int6: if that the spectrograph does not adjoin concatenation hold it is expansionist.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the spectrograph is expansionist is true.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: that the fact that the backwater is a reciprocal but it is not an affectation is not wrong is false.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__