that the stair-rod does not mask Plovdiv and does steepen RNA is wrong.
sent1: if something does not bawl silvex but it does grade the craton is orthotropous. sent2: the craton is anticancer. sent3: the craton is not orthotropous if it is anticancer. sent4: the silvex is not a kind of a fringe if the fact that the runway does not bawl silvex and does grade does not hold. sent5: if something is aciculate the fact that it does not mask Plovdiv and it steepens RNA is incorrect. sent6: the stair-rod does not mask Plovdiv and is orthotropous. sent7: if the silvex is not a kind of a fringe the stair-rod is aciculate. sent8: if the stair-rod does steepen RNA the fact that it is not anticancer and it is a kind of a fringe is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the runway does not bawl silvex but it is a graded.; assump1 -> int1: something does not bawl silvex and is a graded.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the craton is orthotropous.; sent3 & sent2 -> int3: that the craton is not orthotropous is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the runway does not bawl silvex and does grade is incorrect.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the silvex is not a fringe is true.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the stair-rod is aciculate.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that the stair-rod does not mask Plovdiv and steepens RNA is incorrect if it is aciculate.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the stair-rod does not mask Plovdiv and does steepen RNA is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not bawl silvex but it does grade the craton is orthotropous. sent2: the craton is anticancer. sent3: the craton is not orthotropous if it is anticancer. sent4: the silvex is not a kind of a fringe if the fact that the runway does not bawl silvex and does grade does not hold. sent5: if something is aciculate the fact that it does not mask Plovdiv and it steepens RNA is incorrect. sent6: the stair-rod does not mask Plovdiv and is orthotropous. sent7: if the silvex is not a kind of a fringe the stair-rod is aciculate. sent8: if the stair-rod does steepen RNA the fact that it is not anticancer and it is a kind of a fringe is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the runway does not bawl silvex but it is a graded.; assump1 -> int1: something does not bawl silvex and is a graded.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the craton is orthotropous.; sent3 & sent2 -> int3: that the craton is not orthotropous is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the runway does not bawl silvex and does grade is incorrect.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the silvex is not a fringe is true.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the stair-rod is aciculate.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that the stair-rod does not mask Plovdiv and steepens RNA is incorrect if it is aciculate.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__