there exists something such that if it is not introspective then that either it is not peptic or it is a Hispanic or both does not hold.
sent1: if the journalism is not a Hispanic then that the fact that either it is not a monkfish or it does symbolize Anacardium or both hold is not correct. sent2: the fact that something is not peptic and/or is a kind of a Hispanic does not hold if it is non-introspective. sent3: the fact that either something is not peptic or it is a Hispanic or both is incorrect if it is introspective. sent4: the journalism is not peptic or Hispanic or both if that it is not introspective is true. sent5: if that the journalism is not introspective is not false it is not Hispanic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a skeptic the fact that either it does commission or it swelters or both is false. sent7: something is not peptic and/or it is a kind of a Hispanic if it is not introspective. sent8: that the journalism is not peptic and/or it is Hispanic is not true if it is introspective. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not appellative then that either it is not non-pneumococcal or it is a kind of a Tracy or both does not hold is not wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it does not humanize journalism then it is not a Dostoyevsky. sent11: there is something such that if it is introspective the fact that it is non-peptic and/or is not non-Hispanic is false. sent12: that something is not non-peptic or a Hispanic or both does not hold if it is non-introspective.
sent2 -> int1: if the journalism is not introspective then the fact that it is not peptic and/or is a Hispanic is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not introspective then that either it is not peptic or it is a Hispanic or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the journalism is not a Hispanic then that the fact that either it is not a monkfish or it does symbolize Anacardium or both hold is not correct. sent2: the fact that something is not peptic and/or is a kind of a Hispanic does not hold if it is non-introspective. sent3: the fact that either something is not peptic or it is a Hispanic or both is incorrect if it is introspective. sent4: the journalism is not peptic or Hispanic or both if that it is not introspective is true. sent5: if that the journalism is not introspective is not false it is not Hispanic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a skeptic the fact that either it does commission or it swelters or both is false. sent7: something is not peptic and/or it is a kind of a Hispanic if it is not introspective. sent8: that the journalism is not peptic and/or it is Hispanic is not true if it is introspective. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not appellative then that either it is not non-pneumococcal or it is a kind of a Tracy or both does not hold is not wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it does not humanize journalism then it is not a Dostoyevsky. sent11: there is something such that if it is introspective the fact that it is non-peptic and/or is not non-Hispanic is false. sent12: that something is not non-peptic or a Hispanic or both does not hold if it is non-introspective. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the journalism is not introspective then the fact that it is not peptic and/or is a Hispanic is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__