the fact that there is something such that if that it is not phalangeal and/or it is sternal is false it is not tasty is incorrect.
sent1: that something is not maladroit is right if the fact that it is not peaty and/or does answer reduction is not true. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-phalangeal or it is sternal or both is not correct it is tasty. sent3: if that either the Senegalese is phalangeal or it is sternal or both is not true it is not tasty. sent4: if that the Senegalese is not phalangeal and/or it is sternal is not true then it is not tasty. sent5: the Senegalese is not tasty if it is not phalangeal or it is sternal or both. sent6: that there is something such that if it is not phalangeal or not non-sternal or both it is not tasty is right.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the microsporophyll is not maladroit is not wrong if the fact that it either is not peaty or answers reduction or both is false.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not phalangeal and/or it is sternal is false it is not tasty is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not maladroit is right if the fact that it is not peaty and/or does answer reduction is not true. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-phalangeal or it is sternal or both is not correct it is tasty. sent3: if that either the Senegalese is phalangeal or it is sternal or both is not true it is not tasty. sent4: if that the Senegalese is not phalangeal and/or it is sternal is not true then it is not tasty. sent5: the Senegalese is not tasty if it is not phalangeal or it is sternal or both. sent6: that there is something such that if it is not phalangeal or not non-sternal or both it is not tasty is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__