that the septum is cerebellar is true.
sent1: the septum is an aphid and does not restore sedateness. sent2: the chimaera is not a feebleness if there is something such that the fact that it is a monocyte that is a feebleness does not hold. sent3: the septum does not Frenchify if the isotherm does Frenchify but it is not a homosexual. sent4: the sublimate is thermostatic if the weigher does restore Urodella. sent5: something is not old. sent6: a sponge does not restore Hyracotherium. sent7: that something does not hedge pedicel but it is cerebellar is not right if it does not Frenchify. sent8: the appetizer blows if something is a kind of a backdoor. sent9: the septum is not a homosexual. sent10: if something is not a feebleness it is a Vichy that is a Mycrosporidia. sent11: the isotherm does Frenchify but it is not a homosexual if the fact that the sublimate is a ameba is not incorrect. sent12: something is not a hilus if it is thermostatic. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a monocyte and it is a kind of a feebleness is not correct. sent14: the septum is a kind of a backdoor if the isotherm is not a backdoor. sent15: something that is a Vichy is a backdoor. sent16: the pedicel does hedge pedicel if that the septum does not hedge pedicel and is cerebellar is wrong. sent17: something is not a blow if that it does Frenchify and it is cerebellar is not incorrect. sent18: that the isotherm is not a backdoor hold. sent19: the septum does Frenchify if it is a kind of an aphid and does not restore sedateness. sent20: something is not a kind of a homosexual if it is a backdoor. sent21: something is a ameba if it is not a hilus. sent22: if the septum is a backdoor it is not a kind of a homosexual. sent23: the alkylbenzenesulfonate is not non-homosexual. sent24: if something is a backdoor it is not homosexual and it is a kind of a blow. sent25: if that the appetizer is a kind of a blow is not wrong the pedicel is a kind of a pinguecula.
sent19 & sent1 -> int1: the septum Frenchifies.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the septum is cerebellar hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the septum Frenchifies and is cerebellar.; sent17 -> int3: if the septum does Frenchify and it is cerebellar then it is not a blow.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the septum is not a blow.; sent24 -> int5: if the septum is a backdoor it is non-homosexual and it is a kind of a blow.; sent14 & sent18 -> int6: the septum is a backdoor.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the septum is not a kind of a homosexual but it blows.; int7 -> int8: the septum blows.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the pedicel is a pinguecula and does hedge pedicel.
sent15 -> int10: if the chimaera is a Vichy it is a backdoor.; sent10 -> int11: the chimaera is a kind of a Vichy and is a Mycrosporidia if it is not a feebleness.; sent13 & sent2 -> int12: the chimaera is not a feebleness.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the chimaera is both a Vichy and a Mycrosporidia.; int13 -> int14: that the chimaera is a kind of a Vichy is not false.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the chimaera is a kind of a backdoor.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is a backdoor.; int16 & sent8 -> int17: the appetizer is a blow.; sent25 & int17 -> int18: the pedicel is a pinguecula.; sent7 -> int19: that the septum does not hedge pedicel and is cerebellar is incorrect if it does not Frenchify.; sent21 -> int20: the sublimate is a kind of a ameba if it is not a hilus.; sent12 -> int21: if the sublimate is thermostatic the fact that it is a hilus is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the septum is cerebellar is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the septum is an aphid and does not restore sedateness. sent2: the chimaera is not a feebleness if there is something such that the fact that it is a monocyte that is a feebleness does not hold. sent3: the septum does not Frenchify if the isotherm does Frenchify but it is not a homosexual. sent4: the sublimate is thermostatic if the weigher does restore Urodella. sent5: something is not old. sent6: a sponge does not restore Hyracotherium. sent7: that something does not hedge pedicel but it is cerebellar is not right if it does not Frenchify. sent8: the appetizer blows if something is a kind of a backdoor. sent9: the septum is not a homosexual. sent10: if something is not a feebleness it is a Vichy that is a Mycrosporidia. sent11: the isotherm does Frenchify but it is not a homosexual if the fact that the sublimate is a ameba is not incorrect. sent12: something is not a hilus if it is thermostatic. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a monocyte and it is a kind of a feebleness is not correct. sent14: the septum is a kind of a backdoor if the isotherm is not a backdoor. sent15: something that is a Vichy is a backdoor. sent16: the pedicel does hedge pedicel if that the septum does not hedge pedicel and is cerebellar is wrong. sent17: something is not a blow if that it does Frenchify and it is cerebellar is not incorrect. sent18: that the isotherm is not a backdoor hold. sent19: the septum does Frenchify if it is a kind of an aphid and does not restore sedateness. sent20: something is not a kind of a homosexual if it is a backdoor. sent21: something is a ameba if it is not a hilus. sent22: if the septum is a backdoor it is not a kind of a homosexual. sent23: the alkylbenzenesulfonate is not non-homosexual. sent24: if something is a backdoor it is not homosexual and it is a kind of a blow. sent25: if that the appetizer is a kind of a blow is not wrong the pedicel is a kind of a pinguecula. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent1 -> int1: the septum Frenchifies.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the septum is cerebellar hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the septum Frenchifies and is cerebellar.; sent17 -> int3: if the septum does Frenchify and it is cerebellar then it is not a blow.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the septum is not a blow.; sent24 -> int5: if the septum is a backdoor it is non-homosexual and it is a kind of a blow.; sent14 & sent18 -> int6: the septum is a backdoor.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the septum is not a kind of a homosexual but it blows.; int7 -> int8: the septum blows.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__