that the thuggee does not occur prevents that the patronizing balldress occurs.
sent1: both the pacification and the patronizing choked happens. sent2: the agreement prevents that the thuggee does not occur. sent3: if the agreement does not occur then the patronizing balldress does not occur and the plating occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agreement occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the thuggee happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the thuggee does not occur hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the agreement does not occur.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: not the patronizing balldress but the plating occurs.; int4 -> int5: the patronizing balldress does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the thuggee does not occur prevents that the patronizing balldress occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: both the pacification and the patronizing choked happens. sent2: the agreement prevents that the thuggee does not occur. sent3: if the agreement does not occur then the patronizing balldress does not occur and the plating occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agreement occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the thuggee happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the thuggee does not occur hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the agreement does not occur.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: not the patronizing balldress but the plating occurs.; int4 -> int5: the patronizing balldress does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__