the counterbalance is mild.
sent1: that the exhibitionism is not a kind of a poplar but it is a kind of a brickkiln is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the liverwurst is technophilic thing that is mithraic is false the counterbalance is not electric. sent3: if the cable is not anisogamic then that the neonate is not sociopathic and/or it is anisogamic is not right. sent4: if something does not wrench then that it is not non-technophilic but mithraic is wrong. sent5: the sloucher is anisogamic if the neonate is not sociopathic but it is a wrench. sent6: the fact that the counterbalance is not a structuralism and is not a Parnell is not true. sent7: if something is not mild then the fact that that it is electric thing that is a structuralism hold is not true. sent8: if the fact that the exhibitionism is not a poplar and is a brickkiln is wrong then it is a Parnell. sent9: the fact that something is a comb and is a URL is not right if it does not itinerate. sent10: if something is anisogamic it is technophilic. sent11: the neonate is not an electric. sent12: if the fact that the neonate is not sociopathic and/or it is anisogamic is false the liverwurst is not a kind of a wrench. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is electric thing that is a structuralism is incorrect then the neonate is not technophilic. sent14: if the exhibitionism is a Parnell but it does not condole liverwurst the fact that the weldment does not loom is true. sent15: the fact that something is both not mild and not non-sociopathic is false if it is anisogamic. sent16: the fact that the neonate is not mithraic and it does not wrench is not true if it is not technophilic. sent17: if the weldment is not a loom then that the liverwurst is electric and it is a structuralism does not hold. sent18: the liverwurst is not an electric. sent19: if something is both a structuralism and not an electric that it is not mild hold. sent20: everything is not anisogamic. sent21: the exhibitionism does not condole liverwurst. sent22: if the fact that the fact that the counterbalance is not a structuralism and it is not a Parnell does not hold is true it is a structuralism. sent23: something is not sociopathic if it is mild and it is not a wrench.
sent20 -> int1: the cable is not anisogamic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the neonate is not sociopathic and/or it is anisogamic is not right.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the liverwurst does not wrench.; sent4 -> int4: if the liverwurst does not wrench that the fact that it is not non-technophilic but mithraic is right does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the liverwurst is technophilic and it is mithraic is not right.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the counterbalance is non-electric.; sent22 & sent6 -> int7: the counterbalance is a structuralism.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the counterbalance is a kind of a structuralism and is not an electric.; sent19 -> int9: the counterbalance is not mild if it is a structuralism and it is not an electric.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the counterbalance is mild.
sent15 -> int10: the fact that that the neonate is not mild but it is sociopathic hold is not right if it is anisogamic.; sent8 & sent1 -> int11: the exhibitionism is a kind of a Parnell.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the exhibitionism is a kind of a Parnell that does not condole liverwurst.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the weldment is not a kind of a loom.; sent17 & int13 -> int14: the fact that that the liverwurst is a kind of an electric that is a structuralism is not false is not right.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that that it is a kind of electric thing that is a structuralism is not right.; int15 & sent13 -> int16: that the neonate is not technophilic is correct.; sent16 & int16 -> int17: that the neonate is not mithraic and does not wrench is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the counterbalance is mild. ; $context$ = sent1: that the exhibitionism is not a kind of a poplar but it is a kind of a brickkiln is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the liverwurst is technophilic thing that is mithraic is false the counterbalance is not electric. sent3: if the cable is not anisogamic then that the neonate is not sociopathic and/or it is anisogamic is not right. sent4: if something does not wrench then that it is not non-technophilic but mithraic is wrong. sent5: the sloucher is anisogamic if the neonate is not sociopathic but it is a wrench. sent6: the fact that the counterbalance is not a structuralism and is not a Parnell is not true. sent7: if something is not mild then the fact that that it is electric thing that is a structuralism hold is not true. sent8: if the fact that the exhibitionism is not a poplar and is a brickkiln is wrong then it is a Parnell. sent9: the fact that something is a comb and is a URL is not right if it does not itinerate. sent10: if something is anisogamic it is technophilic. sent11: the neonate is not an electric. sent12: if the fact that the neonate is not sociopathic and/or it is anisogamic is false the liverwurst is not a kind of a wrench. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is electric thing that is a structuralism is incorrect then the neonate is not technophilic. sent14: if the exhibitionism is a Parnell but it does not condole liverwurst the fact that the weldment does not loom is true. sent15: the fact that something is both not mild and not non-sociopathic is false if it is anisogamic. sent16: the fact that the neonate is not mithraic and it does not wrench is not true if it is not technophilic. sent17: if the weldment is not a loom then that the liverwurst is electric and it is a structuralism does not hold. sent18: the liverwurst is not an electric. sent19: if something is both a structuralism and not an electric that it is not mild hold. sent20: everything is not anisogamic. sent21: the exhibitionism does not condole liverwurst. sent22: if the fact that the fact that the counterbalance is not a structuralism and it is not a Parnell does not hold is true it is a structuralism. sent23: something is not sociopathic if it is mild and it is not a wrench. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the cable is not anisogamic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the neonate is not sociopathic and/or it is anisogamic is not right.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the liverwurst does not wrench.; sent4 -> int4: if the liverwurst does not wrench that the fact that it is not non-technophilic but mithraic is right does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the liverwurst is technophilic and it is mithraic is not right.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the counterbalance is non-electric.; sent22 & sent6 -> int7: the counterbalance is a structuralism.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the counterbalance is a kind of a structuralism and is not an electric.; sent19 -> int9: the counterbalance is not mild if it is a structuralism and it is not an electric.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__