that the guayule is not non-aniseikonic is not incorrect.
sent1: the surpriser is a kind of an intrigue if the fact that it is sensitive is right. sent2: the interaction is Dostoevskian if the guayule is not aniseikonic. sent3: that the surpriser does intrigue is false if that it does leach impacted and does not leach babies'-breath is right. sent4: the surpriser is an intrigue. sent5: the FO is not insensitive. sent6: the interaction does not subvocalize if the fact that it does not leach babies'-breath and deviates prolongation does not hold. sent7: something is not Jesuitical if the fact that it is a funnel and it is sensitive does not hold. sent8: if either something deviates prolongation or it is not Dostoevskian or both it deviates prolongation. sent9: the surpriser does not leach babies'-breath if the FO does deviate prolongation. sent10: the surpriser is not pacific. sent11: the guayule is not aniseikonic if the fact that the interaction is aniseikonic but it is not Dostoevskian does not hold. sent12: if the FO deviates prolongation then the surpriser does leach impacted but it does not leach babies'-breath. sent13: if the FO is sensitive it is aniseikonic and is not an intrigue. sent14: if the FO is sensitive but it does not subvocalize then it does deviate prolongation. sent15: the surpriser does not leach babies'-breath. sent16: the FO is sensitive but it is not an intrigue. sent17: the FO is a kind of sensitive thing that does not subvocalize if it is a funnel. sent18: the FO is sensitive if it is a funnel. sent19: the shoal is sensitive. sent20: if the interaction is Jesuitical then the FO is a funnel. sent21: if the interaction does funnel then it is both not aniseikonic and Jesuitical.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the guayule is not aniseikonic hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the interaction is Dostoevskian.;
the guayule is not aniseikonic.
sent7 -> int2: the interaction is not Jesuitical if the fact that it does funnel and is sensitive is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the guayule is not non-aniseikonic is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the surpriser is a kind of an intrigue if the fact that it is sensitive is right. sent2: the interaction is Dostoevskian if the guayule is not aniseikonic. sent3: that the surpriser does intrigue is false if that it does leach impacted and does not leach babies'-breath is right. sent4: the surpriser is an intrigue. sent5: the FO is not insensitive. sent6: the interaction does not subvocalize if the fact that it does not leach babies'-breath and deviates prolongation does not hold. sent7: something is not Jesuitical if the fact that it is a funnel and it is sensitive does not hold. sent8: if either something deviates prolongation or it is not Dostoevskian or both it deviates prolongation. sent9: the surpriser does not leach babies'-breath if the FO does deviate prolongation. sent10: the surpriser is not pacific. sent11: the guayule is not aniseikonic if the fact that the interaction is aniseikonic but it is not Dostoevskian does not hold. sent12: if the FO deviates prolongation then the surpriser does leach impacted but it does not leach babies'-breath. sent13: if the FO is sensitive it is aniseikonic and is not an intrigue. sent14: if the FO is sensitive but it does not subvocalize then it does deviate prolongation. sent15: the surpriser does not leach babies'-breath. sent16: the FO is sensitive but it is not an intrigue. sent17: the FO is a kind of sensitive thing that does not subvocalize if it is a funnel. sent18: the FO is sensitive if it is a funnel. sent19: the shoal is sensitive. sent20: if the interaction is Jesuitical then the FO is a funnel. sent21: if the interaction does funnel then it is both not aniseikonic and Jesuitical. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the guayule is not aniseikonic hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the interaction is Dostoevskian.; __UNKNOWN__