that the fact that the socialization does not occur and the epicness does not occur is true is not true.
sent1: the fact that the socialization does not occur and the epicness does not occur is not correct if the toleration does not occur. sent2: the epicness does not occur and the commercialization does not occur. sent3: the fact that the rationalistness occurs is true. sent4: the fact that the minister does not occur and the gladiatorialness happens does not hold if that the yak does not occur is not false. sent5: the commercialization does not occur. sent6: if the commercialization occurs then the epic occurs. sent7: that the calling occurs hold. sent8: if the tinseling kink does not occur and the calling does not occur the tinseling IRS does not occur. sent9: the socialization is prevented by that the tinseling kink occurs and the call happens. sent10: that the yak does not occur and the incorporating Physeter does not occur is brought about by that the unnaturalness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the tinseling IRS occurs and the calling does not occur does not hold if the commercialization occurs. sent12: that both the correction and the cerebralness occurs prevents that the consolation occurs. sent13: that the dramaticness happens is prevented by that the incorporating physiologist occurs and the tinseling hayrack happens. sent14: that the tinseling kink happens is caused by that the tinseling IRS occurs. sent15: the mangling blocked occurs. sent16: the toleration occurs. sent17: the arbitrativeness does not occur. sent18: the gladiatorialness does not occur if that the ministering does not occur but the gladiatorialness occurs is not right. sent19: the tinseling IRS happens if the toleration happens. sent20: the resinlikeness does not occur. sent21: if the gladiatorialness does not occur then the fact that the briefing draper does not occur hold. sent22: the commercialization occurs if the briefing draper does not occur.
sent19 & sent16 -> int1: the tinseling IRS occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the tinseling kink occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: both the tinseling kink and the call occurs.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the socialization does not occur.; sent2 -> int5: the epic does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the socialization does not occur and the epic does not occur is not true.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the socialization does not occur and the epicness does not occur is true is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the socialization does not occur and the epicness does not occur is not correct if the toleration does not occur. sent2: the epicness does not occur and the commercialization does not occur. sent3: the fact that the rationalistness occurs is true. sent4: the fact that the minister does not occur and the gladiatorialness happens does not hold if that the yak does not occur is not false. sent5: the commercialization does not occur. sent6: if the commercialization occurs then the epic occurs. sent7: that the calling occurs hold. sent8: if the tinseling kink does not occur and the calling does not occur the tinseling IRS does not occur. sent9: the socialization is prevented by that the tinseling kink occurs and the call happens. sent10: that the yak does not occur and the incorporating Physeter does not occur is brought about by that the unnaturalness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the tinseling IRS occurs and the calling does not occur does not hold if the commercialization occurs. sent12: that both the correction and the cerebralness occurs prevents that the consolation occurs. sent13: that the dramaticness happens is prevented by that the incorporating physiologist occurs and the tinseling hayrack happens. sent14: that the tinseling kink happens is caused by that the tinseling IRS occurs. sent15: the mangling blocked occurs. sent16: the toleration occurs. sent17: the arbitrativeness does not occur. sent18: the gladiatorialness does not occur if that the ministering does not occur but the gladiatorialness occurs is not right. sent19: the tinseling IRS happens if the toleration happens. sent20: the resinlikeness does not occur. sent21: if the gladiatorialness does not occur then the fact that the briefing draper does not occur hold. sent22: the commercialization occurs if the briefing draper does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent16 -> int1: the tinseling IRS occurs.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the tinseling kink occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: both the tinseling kink and the call occurs.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the socialization does not occur.; sent2 -> int5: the epic does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__