there exists something such that if that it is not hotbed and/or it is an alveolar is not right then it is not environmental.
sent1: the electroscope is environmental if the fact that it is not hotbed or is an alveolar or both is wrong. sent2: the inhalation is not environmental if that it is not a pannikin and/or it is a pederast is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if that either it is not punctureless or it outflanks broken or both does not hold then it does not mature. sent4: the electroscope is not a kind of an alveolar if the fact that it is not a kind of a FICA or it is a kind of a stamina or both is wrong. sent5: if the fact that the greaves is non-immunotherapeutic or gluttonous or both does not hold the fact that it does not appeal is correct. sent6: if the fact that something is either not an identification or alveolar or both is wrong then it is non-bibliographic. sent7: if that the acinus is a denizen and/or does outflank Seriola is wrong it is not a pederast. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is hotbed and/or it is alveolar does not hold then it is not environmental. sent9: the electroscope is not unpardonable if the fact that it is not epizoan and/or it is hotbed does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not integumentary and/or it is shambolic is not right then it is not pessimistic. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not hotbed and/or it is an alveolar then it is not environmental hold. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that either it does not outflank greaves or it is a hunk or both is wrong then it is not homeopathic. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is not catabolic and/or it is a oscine does not hold it is not nautical. sent14: there is something such that if it does not alliterate and/or it is not non-gluttonous it does not outflank stubbornness. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not insecticidal and/or it is a flop does not hold then the fact that it is not immunotherapeutic hold. sent16: if the fact that something does not outflank Seriola or it is a catechin or both does not hold then it is not an alveolar. sent17: there exists something such that if that it does not outflank craft or is a Honduran or both is wrong then it does not splat rictus. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that that it is not hotbed or is an alveolar or both is not false does not hold it is environmental. sent19: the electroscope is not environmental if that it either is hotbed or is not non-alveolar or both does not hold. sent20: if the electroscope is non-hotbed and/or it is an alveolar then it is not environmental. sent21: if that the electroscope is not hotbed and/or it is alveolar does not hold it is not environmental.
sent21 -> hypothesis;
the inquirer is not alveolar if that it does not outflank Seriola and/or it is a catechin is wrong.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not hotbed and/or it is an alveolar is not right then it is not environmental. ; $context$ = sent1: the electroscope is environmental if the fact that it is not hotbed or is an alveolar or both is wrong. sent2: the inhalation is not environmental if that it is not a pannikin and/or it is a pederast is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if that either it is not punctureless or it outflanks broken or both does not hold then it does not mature. sent4: the electroscope is not a kind of an alveolar if the fact that it is not a kind of a FICA or it is a kind of a stamina or both is wrong. sent5: if the fact that the greaves is non-immunotherapeutic or gluttonous or both does not hold the fact that it does not appeal is correct. sent6: if the fact that something is either not an identification or alveolar or both is wrong then it is non-bibliographic. sent7: if that the acinus is a denizen and/or does outflank Seriola is wrong it is not a pederast. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is hotbed and/or it is alveolar does not hold then it is not environmental. sent9: the electroscope is not unpardonable if the fact that it is not epizoan and/or it is hotbed does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not integumentary and/or it is shambolic is not right then it is not pessimistic. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not hotbed and/or it is an alveolar then it is not environmental hold. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that either it does not outflank greaves or it is a hunk or both is wrong then it is not homeopathic. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is not catabolic and/or it is a oscine does not hold it is not nautical. sent14: there is something such that if it does not alliterate and/or it is not non-gluttonous it does not outflank stubbornness. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not insecticidal and/or it is a flop does not hold then the fact that it is not immunotherapeutic hold. sent16: if the fact that something does not outflank Seriola or it is a catechin or both does not hold then it is not an alveolar. sent17: there exists something such that if that it does not outflank craft or is a Honduran or both is wrong then it does not splat rictus. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that that it is not hotbed or is an alveolar or both is not false does not hold it is environmental. sent19: the electroscope is not environmental if that it either is hotbed or is not non-alveolar or both does not hold. sent20: if the electroscope is non-hotbed and/or it is an alveolar then it is not environmental. sent21: if that the electroscope is not hotbed and/or it is alveolar does not hold it is not environmental. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__