the platyctenean is not ripe.
sent1: there exists something such that it is tolerable. sent2: if something is not romantic but a Oujda then it is not ripe. sent3: if something is not triumphal then it is non-ripe. sent4: the fact that the platyctenean is triumphal and it does repress zoologist is incorrect if the mesh is not a kind of a Oujda. sent5: something that is not a Tiberius or excusable or both is sociopathic. sent6: the plainsman is not a kind of a Tiberius and/or it is excusable. sent7: there exists something such that it is romantic. sent8: if the fact that something is triumphal and it represses zoologist is not correct it is not ripe. sent9: the fact that the platyctenean is not ripe is not wrong if it is not triumphal. sent10: the mesh does not repress zoologist. sent11: the plainsman is sociopathic if it is not inexcusable. sent12: if the mesh is a Oujda then it is a romantic. sent13: the mesh is tolerable. sent14: the platyctenean is not a Oujda. sent15: if something is excusable it is not non-sociopathic. sent16: the fact that something is a romantic but it is not tolerable does not hold if it is not sociopathic. sent17: the plainsman is not sociopathic if a romantic is tolerable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mesh is a Oujda.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the mesh is romantic.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the mesh is a kind of a romantic and it is tolerable.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a romantic and tolerable hold.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the plainsman is not sociopathic.; sent5 -> int5: if the plainsman is not a Tiberius or excusable or both it is sociopathic.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the plainsman is sociopathic.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the mesh is not a Oujda.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the fact that the platyctenean is not non-triumphal and represses zoologist is wrong.; sent8 -> int10: the platyctenean is not ripe if the fact that it is triumphal and it represses zoologist is incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the mesh is not ripe.
sent2 -> int11: if the mesh is a kind of non-romantic a Oujda that it is not ripe is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the platyctenean is not ripe. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is tolerable. sent2: if something is not romantic but a Oujda then it is not ripe. sent3: if something is not triumphal then it is non-ripe. sent4: the fact that the platyctenean is triumphal and it does repress zoologist is incorrect if the mesh is not a kind of a Oujda. sent5: something that is not a Tiberius or excusable or both is sociopathic. sent6: the plainsman is not a kind of a Tiberius and/or it is excusable. sent7: there exists something such that it is romantic. sent8: if the fact that something is triumphal and it represses zoologist is not correct it is not ripe. sent9: the fact that the platyctenean is not ripe is not wrong if it is not triumphal. sent10: the mesh does not repress zoologist. sent11: the plainsman is sociopathic if it is not inexcusable. sent12: if the mesh is a Oujda then it is a romantic. sent13: the mesh is tolerable. sent14: the platyctenean is not a Oujda. sent15: if something is excusable it is not non-sociopathic. sent16: the fact that something is a romantic but it is not tolerable does not hold if it is not sociopathic. sent17: the plainsman is not sociopathic if a romantic is tolerable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mesh is a Oujda.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the mesh is romantic.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the mesh is a kind of a romantic and it is tolerable.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a romantic and tolerable hold.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the plainsman is not sociopathic.; sent5 -> int5: if the plainsman is not a Tiberius or excusable or both it is sociopathic.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the plainsman is sociopathic.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the mesh is not a Oujda.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the fact that the platyctenean is not non-triumphal and represses zoologist is wrong.; sent8 -> int10: the platyctenean is not ripe if the fact that it is triumphal and it represses zoologist is incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__