that that the brae diffuses acetylene is not wrong if the minimalist does nark does not hold.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a demonstrativeness and it does not anastomose is wrong then the minimalist is a demonstrativeness. sent2: if there exists something such that it does anastomose that the brae is a demonstrativeness that is not a topping is wrong. sent3: that the brae is not endermic and it does not throng does not hold. sent4: if the fact that something does not anastomose and is not a topping is incorrect then it narks. sent5: if there is something such that it does anastomose that the brae is not a demonstrativeness and it is not a kind of a topping is not right. sent6: something investigates Cenozoic. sent7: everything is not a lamenting and is not a kind of a Platanistidae. sent8: if there is something such that either it is a kind of a topping or it does not diffuse acetylene or both the brae is a nark. sent9: if the minimalist is a nark then the Fissipedia anastomoses. sent10: if that something is not a demonstrativeness and it is not a topping is not correct the fact that it does diffuse acetylene hold. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a nark then that the Fissipedia is not a demonstrativeness and does not anastomose is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the brae is not a demonstrativeness but it does top is incorrect if there is something such that that it does anastomose hold. sent13: the minimalist does diffuse acetylene if the brae does nark. sent14: that the brae is not a kind of a demonstrativeness but it tops is not true. sent15: if something is not a Platanistidae then it is a topping or it does not diffuse acetylene or both. sent16: there exists something such that it is a tout. sent17: the ceramic is a demonstrativeness. sent18: if there is something such that it does diffuse acetylene then that the minimalist is not topping and not a nark does not hold. sent19: that the brae is a demonstrativeness but it is not topping is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the minimalist does nark.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Fissipedia anastomoses.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it anastomoses hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the brae is not a demonstrativeness and it is not a topping is not correct.; sent10 -> int4: if that the brae is not a demonstrativeness and it is not a topping does not hold then it does diffuse acetylene.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the brae does diffuse acetylene.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the minimalist is a demonstrativeness.
sent7 -> int6: the clianthus is not a lamenting and it is not a Platanistidae.; int6 -> int7: the clianthus is not a Platanistidae.; int7 -> int8: everything is not a kind of a Platanistidae.; int8 -> int9: the gerbil is not a Platanistidae.; sent15 -> int10: the gerbil is topping or it does not diffuse acetylene or both if it is not a kind of a Platanistidae.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the gerbil is a topping or it does not diffuse acetylene or both is not incorrect.; int11 -> int12: the fact that either something does top or it does not diffuse acetylene or both is not wrong.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: that the brae is a kind of a nark is not incorrect.; int13 -> int14: something narks.; sent11 & int14 -> int15: that the Fissipedia is not a demonstrativeness and it does not anastomose does not hold.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that that it is not a demonstrativeness and it does not anastomose does not hold.; sent1 & int16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the brae diffuses acetylene is not wrong if the minimalist does nark does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a demonstrativeness and it does not anastomose is wrong then the minimalist is a demonstrativeness. sent2: if there exists something such that it does anastomose that the brae is a demonstrativeness that is not a topping is wrong. sent3: that the brae is not endermic and it does not throng does not hold. sent4: if the fact that something does not anastomose and is not a topping is incorrect then it narks. sent5: if there is something such that it does anastomose that the brae is not a demonstrativeness and it is not a kind of a topping is not right. sent6: something investigates Cenozoic. sent7: everything is not a lamenting and is not a kind of a Platanistidae. sent8: if there is something such that either it is a kind of a topping or it does not diffuse acetylene or both the brae is a nark. sent9: if the minimalist is a nark then the Fissipedia anastomoses. sent10: if that something is not a demonstrativeness and it is not a topping is not correct the fact that it does diffuse acetylene hold. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a nark then that the Fissipedia is not a demonstrativeness and does not anastomose is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the brae is not a demonstrativeness but it does top is incorrect if there is something such that that it does anastomose hold. sent13: the minimalist does diffuse acetylene if the brae does nark. sent14: that the brae is not a kind of a demonstrativeness but it tops is not true. sent15: if something is not a Platanistidae then it is a topping or it does not diffuse acetylene or both. sent16: there exists something such that it is a tout. sent17: the ceramic is a demonstrativeness. sent18: if there is something such that it does diffuse acetylene then that the minimalist is not topping and not a nark does not hold. sent19: that the brae is a demonstrativeness but it is not topping is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the minimalist does nark.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Fissipedia anastomoses.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it anastomoses hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the brae is not a demonstrativeness and it is not a topping is not correct.; sent10 -> int4: if that the brae is not a demonstrativeness and it is not a topping does not hold then it does diffuse acetylene.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the brae does diffuse acetylene.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__