the nanotube clues Graz.
sent1: if the nanotube is a kind of a Ephesian then the fact that it is inconclusive hold. sent2: an inconclusive thing does not clue Graz. sent3: the nanotube is a Ephesian if it suspends Dipylon. sent4: the nanotube clues Graz if that the proctologist is not a kind of a Ephesian but it is an implementation is not incorrect. sent5: the nanotube is Ephesian thing that is an implementation.
sent5 -> int1: the nanotube is Ephesian.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the nanotube is inconclusive.; sent2 -> int3: the nanotube does not clue Graz if it is inconclusive.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the nanotube clues Graz.
$hypothesis$ = the nanotube clues Graz. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nanotube is a kind of a Ephesian then the fact that it is inconclusive hold. sent2: an inconclusive thing does not clue Graz. sent3: the nanotube is a Ephesian if it suspends Dipylon. sent4: the nanotube clues Graz if that the proctologist is not a kind of a Ephesian but it is an implementation is not incorrect. sent5: the nanotube is Ephesian thing that is an implementation. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the nanotube is Ephesian.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the nanotube is inconclusive.; sent2 -> int3: the nanotube does not clue Graz if it is inconclusive.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__