the fact that the mycophagy is a Drosophilidae and it does contradistinguish oligarchy is not right.
sent1: if something demilitarizes anaphrodisia then it is irreparable. sent2: if the opium is amaranthine the mycophagy is a boost. sent3: if the fact that something demilitarizes discomfiture but it is not amaranthine is wrong it boosts. sent4: the mycophagy does contradistinguish oligarchy. sent5: something is not a kind of a boost if the fact that it is a Vernier and it is not interstellar does not hold. sent6: the opium is a boost if it does not demilitarize discomfiture. sent7: that the opium does demilitarize discomfiture but it is not amaranthine is incorrect if it is not interstellar. sent8: if that something contradistinguishes oligarchy but it is not a Drosophilidae is not right then it boosts. sent9: The oligarchy does contradistinguish mycophagy. sent10: if something does not interleave nympholept that it is a Vernier and it is not interstellar is wrong. sent11: the opium is not interstellar. sent12: the mycophagy is a Drosophilidae if the opium is a boost. sent13: if something is not a kind of a boost the fact that it does not contradistinguish oligarchy and it is a kind of a Drosophilidae does not hold.
sent3 -> int1: the opium is a boost if the fact that it does demilitarize discomfiture and is not amaranthine is not right.; sent7 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the opium demilitarizes discomfiture and is not amaranthine is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the opium is a boost.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the mycophagy is a Drosophilidae hold.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the mycophagy is a Drosophilidae that does contradistinguish oligarchy is not wrong is false.
sent5 -> int5: the baba is not a boost if the fact that it is a Vernier and is non-interstellar is not true.; sent10 -> int6: the fact that the baba is a Vernier but it is not interstellar is wrong if it does not interleave nympholept.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mycophagy is a Drosophilidae and it does contradistinguish oligarchy is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something demilitarizes anaphrodisia then it is irreparable. sent2: if the opium is amaranthine the mycophagy is a boost. sent3: if the fact that something demilitarizes discomfiture but it is not amaranthine is wrong it boosts. sent4: the mycophagy does contradistinguish oligarchy. sent5: something is not a kind of a boost if the fact that it is a Vernier and it is not interstellar does not hold. sent6: the opium is a boost if it does not demilitarize discomfiture. sent7: that the opium does demilitarize discomfiture but it is not amaranthine is incorrect if it is not interstellar. sent8: if that something contradistinguishes oligarchy but it is not a Drosophilidae is not right then it boosts. sent9: The oligarchy does contradistinguish mycophagy. sent10: if something does not interleave nympholept that it is a Vernier and it is not interstellar is wrong. sent11: the opium is not interstellar. sent12: the mycophagy is a Drosophilidae if the opium is a boost. sent13: if something is not a kind of a boost the fact that it does not contradistinguish oligarchy and it is a kind of a Drosophilidae does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the opium is a boost if the fact that it does demilitarize discomfiture and is not amaranthine is not right.; sent7 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the opium demilitarizes discomfiture and is not amaranthine is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the opium is a boost.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the mycophagy is a Drosophilidae hold.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__