that that the nafcillin is a congener that does not damp Talinum is right is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the intellectualization is a kind of the Michener is right if the intellectualization mothballs is correct. sent2: if the intellectualization does damp Talinum the veil is a kind of a mothball but it does not damp Talinum. sent3: something is a kind of a leptodactylid and it does crow veil if the fact that it does stink does not hold. sent4: if the veil does damp Talinum the nafcillin is a congener but it does not damp Talinum. sent5: something that is a discursiveness is a lawn. sent6: if something is a leptodactylid then that it does damp Talinum is not incorrect. sent7: if the veil does damp Talinum the nafcillin does not damp Talinum. sent8: the intellectualization is a mothball but it does not damp Talinum if the veil damp Talinum. sent9: the veil is a kind of a flat. sent10: the rubicelle does damp Talinum. sent11: the intellectualization is a kind of a flat but it does not recruit. sent12: if something is a leptodactylid then that it does mothball is right. sent13: if that the intellectualization does not mothball hold then that the nafcillin is a kind of a congener and does not damp Talinum is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that that it does cling and it does stink is incorrect. sent15: if the fact that the intellectualization is a leptodactylid hold then the veil mothballs and is not a leptodactylid. sent16: if the veil is a congener the nafcillin is a leptodactylid. sent17: the veil does damp Talinum and is not a leptodactylid if the nafcillin is a leptodactylid. sent18: the nafcillin does not damp Talinum. sent19: if the intellectualization is a kind of a Michener the veil is a kind of a leptodactylid. sent20: the intellectualization does mothball. sent21: the veil is a kind of a mothball.
sent1 & sent20 -> int1: that the intellectualization is a Michener is not wrong.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the veil is a leptodactylid.; sent6 -> int3: if the veil is a leptodactylid it damps Talinum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the veil does damp Talinum.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the nafcillin is a kind of a congener and does not damp Talinum is wrong.
sent3 -> int5: if the intellectualization does not stink it is a kind of a leptodactylid that does crow veil.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the nafcillin is a congener that does not damp Talinum is right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the intellectualization is a kind of the Michener is right if the intellectualization mothballs is correct. sent2: if the intellectualization does damp Talinum the veil is a kind of a mothball but it does not damp Talinum. sent3: something is a kind of a leptodactylid and it does crow veil if the fact that it does stink does not hold. sent4: if the veil does damp Talinum the nafcillin is a congener but it does not damp Talinum. sent5: something that is a discursiveness is a lawn. sent6: if something is a leptodactylid then that it does damp Talinum is not incorrect. sent7: if the veil does damp Talinum the nafcillin does not damp Talinum. sent8: the intellectualization is a mothball but it does not damp Talinum if the veil damp Talinum. sent9: the veil is a kind of a flat. sent10: the rubicelle does damp Talinum. sent11: the intellectualization is a kind of a flat but it does not recruit. sent12: if something is a leptodactylid then that it does mothball is right. sent13: if that the intellectualization does not mothball hold then that the nafcillin is a kind of a congener and does not damp Talinum is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that that it does cling and it does stink is incorrect. sent15: if the fact that the intellectualization is a leptodactylid hold then the veil mothballs and is not a leptodactylid. sent16: if the veil is a congener the nafcillin is a leptodactylid. sent17: the veil does damp Talinum and is not a leptodactylid if the nafcillin is a leptodactylid. sent18: the nafcillin does not damp Talinum. sent19: if the intellectualization is a kind of a Michener the veil is a kind of a leptodactylid. sent20: the intellectualization does mothball. sent21: the veil is a kind of a mothball. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent20 -> int1: that the intellectualization is a Michener is not wrong.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the veil is a leptodactylid.; sent6 -> int3: if the veil is a leptodactylid it damps Talinum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the veil does damp Talinum.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__