the seaming tulle does not occur.
sent1: the fact that both the non-limacineness and the non-eolithicness occurs hold if the bargaining midiron does not occur. sent2: if the bargaining sateen occurs then the excommunication and the non-catkinateness happens. sent3: the Austronesian and the griping helpdesk occurs if the Albigensianness does not occur. sent4: if the scapulohumeralness does not occur the bargaining sateen and the bioremediation happens. sent5: the eolithicness does not occur. sent6: the limacineness does not occur. sent7: if the griping overcast does not occur the fact that that the pedesis does not occur and the seaming cere happens is wrong is not false. sent8: the Austronesian causes that the griping snips occurs and the drudgery does not occur. sent9: if the eolithicness does not occur that the non-limacineness and the seaming tulle occurs is false. sent10: that the homeostaticness does not occur is right. sent11: that the scapulohumeralness does not occur is right. sent12: that the feature occurs and the griping snips happens results in that the bargaining midiron does not occur. sent13: the feature occurs if the excommunication happens. sent14: the ford does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the seaming tulle happens hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-limacineness and the seaming tulle occurs.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the non-limacineness and the seaming tulle happens is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the seaming tulle occurs.
sent4 & sent11 -> int4: the bargaining sateen happens and the bioremediation occurs.; int4 -> int5: the bargaining sateen occurs.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the excommunication and the non-catkinateness happens.; int6 -> int7: the excommunication occurs.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the feature happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the seaming tulle does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the non-limacineness and the non-eolithicness occurs hold if the bargaining midiron does not occur. sent2: if the bargaining sateen occurs then the excommunication and the non-catkinateness happens. sent3: the Austronesian and the griping helpdesk occurs if the Albigensianness does not occur. sent4: if the scapulohumeralness does not occur the bargaining sateen and the bioremediation happens. sent5: the eolithicness does not occur. sent6: the limacineness does not occur. sent7: if the griping overcast does not occur the fact that that the pedesis does not occur and the seaming cere happens is wrong is not false. sent8: the Austronesian causes that the griping snips occurs and the drudgery does not occur. sent9: if the eolithicness does not occur that the non-limacineness and the seaming tulle occurs is false. sent10: that the homeostaticness does not occur is right. sent11: that the scapulohumeralness does not occur is right. sent12: that the feature occurs and the griping snips happens results in that the bargaining midiron does not occur. sent13: the feature occurs if the excommunication happens. sent14: the ford does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the seaming tulle happens hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-limacineness and the seaming tulle occurs.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the non-limacineness and the seaming tulle happens is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__