either the weathervane is a busboy or it does not monopolize Catasetum or both.
sent1: that the weathervane is a busboy or it does not monopolize Catasetum or both is not right if the dado is a kind of a embryologist. sent2: everything is a kind of non-sad thing that is monatomic. sent3: if the fact that the weathervane is a Nyiragongo is correct then the feast is not a busboy. sent4: the weathervane is not a busboy. sent5: if something is not a embryologist then it is not a meritocracy and/or is not a wishfulness. sent6: if the weathervane is not a meritocracy but a busboy the feast is a kind of a Nyiragongo. sent7: if something is ambiversive then it monopolizes Catasetum. sent8: if something is not a kind of a Erythronium it is a busboy or it does not monopolize Catasetum or both. sent9: that the meteorite is a kind of a Erythronium is not wrong. sent10: something is not a Menuridae and is a wishfulness if it is pyrographic. sent11: the fact that the Macedonian is not a embryologist is right if it is not sad and it is monatomic. sent12: that if that the sweatsuit is not the meritocracy is not incorrect then that the sweatsuit is both a Nyiragongo and a wishfulness is wrong is true. sent13: if that something is a kind of a Erythronium but it is not a kind of a Nyiragongo is not true that it is not a Erythronium hold. sent14: if something is not a wishfulness it is ambiversive. sent15: the feast is a kind of a Nyiragongo if there exists something such that it is pyrographic. sent16: something is not a Menuridae but a embryologist if it does monopolize Catasetum. sent17: the sweatsuit is not a meritocracy if the fact that that it monopolizes Catasetum and is a kind of a embryologist is right is false. sent18: the weathervane is tragic. sent19: if something is ambiversive it is both not a wishfulness and a meritocracy. sent20: if the meteorite is ambiversive the fact that the weathervane is a Erythronium but it is not a kind of a Nyiragongo does not hold. sent21: if something is a Nyiragongo it is ambiversive. sent22: if the feast is both not a wishfulness and a meritocracy then the dado is a embryologist. sent23: the dado is a kind of a wishfulness. sent24: if the meteorite is a Erythronium the Macedonian is both not a Menuridae and pyrographic. sent25: if the feast is ambiversive it is a kind of a meritocracy.
sent24 & sent9 -> int1: the Macedonian is not a Menuridae but it is pyrographic.; int1 -> int2: the Macedonian is pyrographic.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is pyrographic.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the feast is a Nyiragongo.; sent21 -> int5: the feast is ambiversive if that it is not a Nyiragongo is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the feast is ambiversive.; sent19 -> int7: if the feast is not non-ambiversive then it is not a wishfulness and it is a meritocracy.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the feast is not a wishfulness but it is a meritocracy.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the dado is a kind of a embryologist.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
either the weathervane is a busboy or it does not monopolize Catasetum or both.
sent8 -> int10: the weathervane is a busboy and/or does not monopolize Catasetum if it is not a Erythronium.; sent13 -> int11: if that the fact that the weathervane is a kind of a Erythronium but it is not a Nyiragongo is not incorrect does not hold then it is not a Erythronium.; sent14 -> int12: if that the meteorite is not a wishfulness is true it is not non-ambiversive.; sent5 -> int13: if the Macedonian is not a kind of a embryologist then it is not a meritocracy or not a wishfulness or both.; sent2 -> int14: the Macedonian is not sad and is monatomic.; sent11 & int14 -> int15: the Macedonian is not a kind of a embryologist.; int13 & int15 -> int16: either the Macedonian is not a meritocracy or it is not a wishfulness or both.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a meritocracy and/or it is not a wishfulness.;
$hypothesis$ = either the weathervane is a busboy or it does not monopolize Catasetum or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the weathervane is a busboy or it does not monopolize Catasetum or both is not right if the dado is a kind of a embryologist. sent2: everything is a kind of non-sad thing that is monatomic. sent3: if the fact that the weathervane is a Nyiragongo is correct then the feast is not a busboy. sent4: the weathervane is not a busboy. sent5: if something is not a embryologist then it is not a meritocracy and/or is not a wishfulness. sent6: if the weathervane is not a meritocracy but a busboy the feast is a kind of a Nyiragongo. sent7: if something is ambiversive then it monopolizes Catasetum. sent8: if something is not a kind of a Erythronium it is a busboy or it does not monopolize Catasetum or both. sent9: that the meteorite is a kind of a Erythronium is not wrong. sent10: something is not a Menuridae and is a wishfulness if it is pyrographic. sent11: the fact that the Macedonian is not a embryologist is right if it is not sad and it is monatomic. sent12: that if that the sweatsuit is not the meritocracy is not incorrect then that the sweatsuit is both a Nyiragongo and a wishfulness is wrong is true. sent13: if that something is a kind of a Erythronium but it is not a kind of a Nyiragongo is not true that it is not a Erythronium hold. sent14: if something is not a wishfulness it is ambiversive. sent15: the feast is a kind of a Nyiragongo if there exists something such that it is pyrographic. sent16: something is not a Menuridae but a embryologist if it does monopolize Catasetum. sent17: the sweatsuit is not a meritocracy if the fact that that it monopolizes Catasetum and is a kind of a embryologist is right is false. sent18: the weathervane is tragic. sent19: if something is ambiversive it is both not a wishfulness and a meritocracy. sent20: if the meteorite is ambiversive the fact that the weathervane is a Erythronium but it is not a kind of a Nyiragongo does not hold. sent21: if something is a Nyiragongo it is ambiversive. sent22: if the feast is both not a wishfulness and a meritocracy then the dado is a embryologist. sent23: the dado is a kind of a wishfulness. sent24: if the meteorite is a Erythronium the Macedonian is both not a Menuridae and pyrographic. sent25: if the feast is ambiversive it is a kind of a meritocracy. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent9 -> int1: the Macedonian is not a Menuridae but it is pyrographic.; int1 -> int2: the Macedonian is pyrographic.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is pyrographic.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the feast is a Nyiragongo.; sent21 -> int5: the feast is ambiversive if that it is not a Nyiragongo is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the feast is ambiversive.; sent19 -> int7: if the feast is not non-ambiversive then it is not a wishfulness and it is a meritocracy.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the feast is not a wishfulness but it is a meritocracy.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the dado is a kind of a embryologist.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__