the banner does not contribute orientalism.
sent1: that the mesomorph is not decorous and it does not contribute orientalism is not true. sent2: if that something does contribute irrelevance but it is not nonwoody is not correct then it is not salvific. sent3: if there exists something such that it is nonwoody that the compendium does contribute irrelevance and is not nonwoody is not right. sent4: something that is decorous does contribute orientalism. sent5: if that something is a boilerplate is true then it is a about-face. sent6: the mesomorph is indecorous if the chump does drone squire. sent7: the chateau is nonwoody if it is surmountable. sent8: the topminnow is decorous. sent9: if something is a about-face then that it does not shelve and is non-proactive does not hold. sent10: something is a horseshoe and does drone squire if the fact that it does not contribute spiel is right. sent11: if the banner contributes orientalism then the mesomorph is decorous. sent12: that something is nonwoody hold if it is a Lithodidae. sent13: that the chump is not decorous and it does not drone squire is incorrect. sent14: the bitterwood contributes orientalism. sent15: if the compendium is non-salvific then the splitworm is non-leeward thing that is not a boilerplate. sent16: the chateau is a Lithodidae and/or it is surmountable. sent17: the fact that the chump is not decorous and drones squire is not right. sent18: the mesomorph does not contribute spiel if there exists something such that that that it does not shelve and is not proactive is right is not true. sent19: if the splitworm is not a leeward and it is not a boilerplate the chump is a boilerplate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the banner contributes orientalism.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the mesomorph is decorous is not wrong.;
the banner contributes orientalism.
sent4 -> int2: if the banner is decorous then it contributes orientalism.; sent10 -> int3: the mesomorph is a kind of a horseshoe and drones squire if it does not contribute spiel.; sent9 -> int4: that the chump does not shelve and it is not proactive does not hold if it about-faces.; sent5 -> int5: if the chump is a boilerplate it is a about-face.; sent2 -> int6: if that the compendium does contribute irrelevance but it is not nonwoody is incorrect that it is not salvific is not false.; sent12 -> int7: the chateau is nonwoody if that it is a kind of a Lithodidae hold.; sent16 & int7 & sent7 -> int8: the chateau is nonwoody.; int8 -> int9: the fact that something is nonwoody is not wrong.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: that the compendium contributes irrelevance and is not nonwoody is not right.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the compendium is not salvific.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the splitworm is not leeward and it is not a boilerplate.; sent19 & int12 -> int13: that the chump is a boilerplate is not false.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the chump does about-face.; int4 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the chump does not shelve and it is not proactive is not right.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it does not shelve and it is not proactive is not right.; int16 & sent18 -> int17: the fact that the mesomorph does not contribute spiel hold.; int3 & int17 -> int18: the mesomorph does horseshoe and it drones squire.; int18 -> int19: the mesomorph drones squire.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it drones squire.;
$hypothesis$ = the banner does not contribute orientalism. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mesomorph is not decorous and it does not contribute orientalism is not true. sent2: if that something does contribute irrelevance but it is not nonwoody is not correct then it is not salvific. sent3: if there exists something such that it is nonwoody that the compendium does contribute irrelevance and is not nonwoody is not right. sent4: something that is decorous does contribute orientalism. sent5: if that something is a boilerplate is true then it is a about-face. sent6: the mesomorph is indecorous if the chump does drone squire. sent7: the chateau is nonwoody if it is surmountable. sent8: the topminnow is decorous. sent9: if something is a about-face then that it does not shelve and is non-proactive does not hold. sent10: something is a horseshoe and does drone squire if the fact that it does not contribute spiel is right. sent11: if the banner contributes orientalism then the mesomorph is decorous. sent12: that something is nonwoody hold if it is a Lithodidae. sent13: that the chump is not decorous and it does not drone squire is incorrect. sent14: the bitterwood contributes orientalism. sent15: if the compendium is non-salvific then the splitworm is non-leeward thing that is not a boilerplate. sent16: the chateau is a Lithodidae and/or it is surmountable. sent17: the fact that the chump is not decorous and drones squire is not right. sent18: the mesomorph does not contribute spiel if there exists something such that that that it does not shelve and is not proactive is right is not true. sent19: if the splitworm is not a leeward and it is not a boilerplate the chump is a boilerplate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the banner contributes orientalism.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the mesomorph is decorous is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__