the snub does not occur.
sent1: the mistake does not occur. sent2: the snowballing tangerine occurs. sent3: both the Welsh and the reissuing spit happens. sent4: the anemographicness happens. sent5: the consternating coiled occurs. sent6: the snowballing tangerine happens and the .22-caliberness occurs. sent7: that both the consternating oroide and the snowballing advocacy happens is brought about by that the mistake does not occur. sent8: the snowballing advocacy does not occur if that the consternating Lysol happens and/or the unrespectableness occurs does not hold. sent9: the Paleozoicness does not occur. sent10: both the coiling and the efflorescence occurs if the origin does not occur. sent11: the consternating oroide occurs if the mistaking does not occur. sent12: the vacationing and the pulp happens. sent13: the snowballing advocacy does not occur if that that either the consternating Lysol does not occur or the unrespectableness happens or both is incorrect is not wrong. sent14: that the anthropolatry does not occur but the snowballing advocacy occurs results in the snub. sent15: the consternating Lysol occurs. sent16: if the snowballing tangerine does not occur then the .22-caliberness does not occur and the consternating oroide does not occur. sent17: the fact that the capering does not occur and/or the restfulness happens does not hold. sent18: the snub does not occur if the anthropolatry and the .22-caliberness occurs. sent19: if the anthropolatry does not occur that the consternating Lysol does not occur or the unrespectableness happens or both does not hold. sent20: the equatorialness occurs and the hedge occurs. sent21: the SIGINT occurs. sent22: the consternating Lysol occurs if the anthropolatry does not occur. sent23: if the pacing does not occur then that the trustfulness or the consternating Serbia or both happens is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the anthropolatry does not occur is not incorrect.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the consternating Lysol does not occur and/or the unrespectableness occurs is wrong.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the snowballing advocacy does not occur.; sent7 & sent1 -> int3: the consternating oroide and the snowballing advocacy happens.; int3 -> int4: the snowballing advocacy occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the anthropolatry happens.; sent6 -> int7: the .22-caliberness occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the anthropolatry and the .22-caliberness occurs.; int8 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the snub happens.
$hypothesis$ = the snub does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the mistake does not occur. sent2: the snowballing tangerine occurs. sent3: both the Welsh and the reissuing spit happens. sent4: the anemographicness happens. sent5: the consternating coiled occurs. sent6: the snowballing tangerine happens and the .22-caliberness occurs. sent7: that both the consternating oroide and the snowballing advocacy happens is brought about by that the mistake does not occur. sent8: the snowballing advocacy does not occur if that the consternating Lysol happens and/or the unrespectableness occurs does not hold. sent9: the Paleozoicness does not occur. sent10: both the coiling and the efflorescence occurs if the origin does not occur. sent11: the consternating oroide occurs if the mistaking does not occur. sent12: the vacationing and the pulp happens. sent13: the snowballing advocacy does not occur if that that either the consternating Lysol does not occur or the unrespectableness happens or both is incorrect is not wrong. sent14: that the anthropolatry does not occur but the snowballing advocacy occurs results in the snub. sent15: the consternating Lysol occurs. sent16: if the snowballing tangerine does not occur then the .22-caliberness does not occur and the consternating oroide does not occur. sent17: the fact that the capering does not occur and/or the restfulness happens does not hold. sent18: the snub does not occur if the anthropolatry and the .22-caliberness occurs. sent19: if the anthropolatry does not occur that the consternating Lysol does not occur or the unrespectableness happens or both does not hold. sent20: the equatorialness occurs and the hedge occurs. sent21: the SIGINT occurs. sent22: the consternating Lysol occurs if the anthropolatry does not occur. sent23: if the pacing does not occur then that the trustfulness or the consternating Serbia or both happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the anthropolatry does not occur is not incorrect.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the consternating Lysol does not occur and/or the unrespectableness occurs is wrong.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the snowballing advocacy does not occur.; sent7 & sent1 -> int3: the consternating oroide and the snowballing advocacy happens.; int3 -> int4: the snowballing advocacy occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the anthropolatry happens.; sent6 -> int7: the .22-caliberness occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the anthropolatry and the .22-caliberness occurs.; int8 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__