that the serratus is mesenteric thing that does cloy spoon is not correct.
sent1: if the bunt is microscopic and it is humanistic that the great-uncle does not underquote hipped is right. sent2: something is not a bent if it does not underquote hipped. sent3: that the ceratopsian bends if the epigenesis is a kind of a bends and does not depose subscription is not wrong. sent4: if the ceratopsian is not a battering then the serratus is mesenteric and is a bent. sent5: something is both microscopic and not humanistic if it is mesenteric. sent6: something is not humanistic if it is mesenteric. sent7: the great-uncle does not underquote hipped if the bunt is microscopic but not humanistic. sent8: the bushing underquotes mesentery. sent9: the ceratopsian does bend if the epigenesis does bend and it does depose subscription. sent10: if the bushing underquotes mesentery the epigenesis is a kind of a bent that does not depose subscription. sent11: the bunt is not humanistic. sent12: the fact that the bunt is not humanistic is correct if it is mesenteric. sent13: the epigenesis does not depose subscription. sent14: the wren-tit is not a kind of a bent. sent15: if the bushing underquotes mesentery then the epigenesis does not depose subscription. sent16: the fact that the fact that the serratus is a kind of mesenteric thing that cloys spoon is not wrong is wrong if the bunt is not mesenteric. sent17: the ceratopsian is not a bent if it does not underquote hipped. sent18: The mesentery underquotes bushing. sent19: something does not bend if the fact that it is a battering that does underquote hipped is wrong.
sent5 -> int1: the bunt is microscopic thing that is not humanistic if it is mesenteric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bunt is mesenteric.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bunt is microscopic but not humanistic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the great-uncle does not underquote hipped.; sent19 -> int4: if the fact that the ceratopsian is a battering and it does underquote hipped does not hold it is not a bent.; sent10 & sent8 -> int5: the epigenesis is a bent that does not depose subscription.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the ceratopsian is a bent.;
the serratus is mesenteric thing that does cloy spoon.
$hypothesis$ = that the serratus is mesenteric thing that does cloy spoon is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bunt is microscopic and it is humanistic that the great-uncle does not underquote hipped is right. sent2: something is not a bent if it does not underquote hipped. sent3: that the ceratopsian bends if the epigenesis is a kind of a bends and does not depose subscription is not wrong. sent4: if the ceratopsian is not a battering then the serratus is mesenteric and is a bent. sent5: something is both microscopic and not humanistic if it is mesenteric. sent6: something is not humanistic if it is mesenteric. sent7: the great-uncle does not underquote hipped if the bunt is microscopic but not humanistic. sent8: the bushing underquotes mesentery. sent9: the ceratopsian does bend if the epigenesis does bend and it does depose subscription. sent10: if the bushing underquotes mesentery the epigenesis is a kind of a bent that does not depose subscription. sent11: the bunt is not humanistic. sent12: the fact that the bunt is not humanistic is correct if it is mesenteric. sent13: the epigenesis does not depose subscription. sent14: the wren-tit is not a kind of a bent. sent15: if the bushing underquotes mesentery then the epigenesis does not depose subscription. sent16: the fact that the fact that the serratus is a kind of mesenteric thing that cloys spoon is not wrong is wrong if the bunt is not mesenteric. sent17: the ceratopsian is not a bent if it does not underquote hipped. sent18: The mesentery underquotes bushing. sent19: something does not bend if the fact that it is a battering that does underquote hipped is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the bunt is microscopic thing that is not humanistic if it is mesenteric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bunt is mesenteric.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bunt is microscopic but not humanistic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the great-uncle does not underquote hipped.; sent19 -> int4: if the fact that the ceratopsian is a battering and it does underquote hipped does not hold it is not a bent.; sent10 & sent8 -> int5: the epigenesis is a bent that does not depose subscription.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the ceratopsian is a bent.; __UNKNOWN__