the seat happens.
sent1: that the Rhenishness occurs and the comforting occurs is triggered by that the thaw does not occur. sent2: the thaw does not occur if that the Constitution but not the look occurs is not true. sent3: the fact that the Marks does not occur and the pitching fleshiness does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the squeegeeing finger occurs is not incorrect. sent4: either the conversion or the non-Napoleonicness or both occurs if the shrinkableness occurs. sent5: if the shrinkableness does not occur and the Marks occurs the seat occurs. sent6: the pitching fleshiness happens and the Marks occurs. sent7: that the ergoticness does not occur and the raftering blockade does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the Rhenish occurs then the squeegeeing finger happens. sent9: that the Marks does not occur and the seating does not occur is triggered by that the pitching fleshiness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the Constitution but not the looking occurs does not hold if the numeral occurs. sent11: the shrinkableness does not occur if the fact that the conversion does not occur and the Napoleonicness does not occur is wrong. sent12: the conversion happens. sent13: that not the conversion but the Napoleonicness happens is not true. sent14: the conversion does not occur and the seat does not occur if the Napoleonicness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conversion does not occur and the Napoleonicness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the conversion does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that that the conversion does not occur and the Napoleonicness does not occur is not right is not wrong.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the shrinkableness does not occur.; sent6 -> int5: the fact that the Marks happens is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the unshrinkableness and the Marks occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the seating does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the seat happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Rhenishness occurs and the comforting occurs is triggered by that the thaw does not occur. sent2: the thaw does not occur if that the Constitution but not the look occurs is not true. sent3: the fact that the Marks does not occur and the pitching fleshiness does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the squeegeeing finger occurs is not incorrect. sent4: either the conversion or the non-Napoleonicness or both occurs if the shrinkableness occurs. sent5: if the shrinkableness does not occur and the Marks occurs the seat occurs. sent6: the pitching fleshiness happens and the Marks occurs. sent7: that the ergoticness does not occur and the raftering blockade does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the Rhenish occurs then the squeegeeing finger happens. sent9: that the Marks does not occur and the seating does not occur is triggered by that the pitching fleshiness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the Constitution but not the looking occurs does not hold if the numeral occurs. sent11: the shrinkableness does not occur if the fact that the conversion does not occur and the Napoleonicness does not occur is wrong. sent12: the conversion happens. sent13: that not the conversion but the Napoleonicness happens is not true. sent14: the conversion does not occur and the seat does not occur if the Napoleonicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conversion does not occur and the Napoleonicness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the conversion does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that that the conversion does not occur and the Napoleonicness does not occur is not right is not wrong.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the shrinkableness does not occur.; sent6 -> int5: the fact that the Marks happens is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the unshrinkableness and the Marks occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__