the shittah is greater and not dipolar.
sent1: that that the basics does not clear bonbon and/or it is not a kind of a butterfly does not hold is true if the fact that it visas paleoethnography is correct. sent2: the shittah is greater. sent3: if the chevron is not a hoya then the shittah is greater but it is not dipolar. sent4: the shittah is a kind of a tomalley if the mycophagist is a kind of a tomalley. sent5: if the mycophagist is a kind of a u-turn the fact that it does not grease Dugongidae or it is not extinguishable or both is not right. sent6: if the chevron is a kind of a u-turn that it is a kind of a hoya is not false. sent7: if something is not a u-turn the fact that it is both greater and not dipolar does not hold. sent8: something is not exploratory if it is a tomalley but not advisable. sent9: if the mycophagist is a u-turn it is a kind of a hoya. sent10: the bechamel is not a hoya. sent11: there exists something such that it is extinguishable. sent12: there exists something such that that it does not grease Dugongidae and/or is extinguishable is wrong. sent13: the fact that the mycophagist is not a hoya and/or it is not extinguishable is not right. sent14: there exists something such that it does not grease Dugongidae or it is not extinguishable or both. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it does grease Dugongidae or it is not extinguishable or both is wrong. sent16: the mycophagist is a kind of a u-turn. sent17: if the chevron is not a kind of a hoya the shittah is greater. sent18: the fact that the mycophagist is a tomalley is not incorrect. sent19: there exists something such that it does grease Dugongidae. sent20: the mycophagist is extinguishable. sent21: the fact that something is a kind of a u-turn but it is not a kind of a hoya is wrong if it is not exploratory. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that either it does not grease Dugongidae or it is not extinguishable or both is not true then the fact that the chevron is not a hoya is right.
sent5 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that either the mycophagist does not grease Dugongidae or it is inextinguishable or both is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not grease Dugongidae and/or is not extinguishable does not hold.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the chevron is not a hoya.; sent3 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the shittah is both greater and not dipolar is false.
sent7 -> int4: that the shittah is both greater and not dipolar is not true if it is not a u-turn.; sent21 -> int5: the fact that the shittah is a u-turn but not a hoya is wrong if it is not exploratory.; sent8 -> int6: that the shittah is not exploratory is right if it is a kind of a tomalley and it is not advisable.; sent4 & sent18 -> int7: the shittah is a tomalley.;
$hypothesis$ = the shittah is greater and not dipolar. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the basics does not clear bonbon and/or it is not a kind of a butterfly does not hold is true if the fact that it visas paleoethnography is correct. sent2: the shittah is greater. sent3: if the chevron is not a hoya then the shittah is greater but it is not dipolar. sent4: the shittah is a kind of a tomalley if the mycophagist is a kind of a tomalley. sent5: if the mycophagist is a kind of a u-turn the fact that it does not grease Dugongidae or it is not extinguishable or both is not right. sent6: if the chevron is a kind of a u-turn that it is a kind of a hoya is not false. sent7: if something is not a u-turn the fact that it is both greater and not dipolar does not hold. sent8: something is not exploratory if it is a tomalley but not advisable. sent9: if the mycophagist is a u-turn it is a kind of a hoya. sent10: the bechamel is not a hoya. sent11: there exists something such that it is extinguishable. sent12: there exists something such that that it does not grease Dugongidae and/or is extinguishable is wrong. sent13: the fact that the mycophagist is not a hoya and/or it is not extinguishable is not right. sent14: there exists something such that it does not grease Dugongidae or it is not extinguishable or both. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it does grease Dugongidae or it is not extinguishable or both is wrong. sent16: the mycophagist is a kind of a u-turn. sent17: if the chevron is not a kind of a hoya the shittah is greater. sent18: the fact that the mycophagist is a tomalley is not incorrect. sent19: there exists something such that it does grease Dugongidae. sent20: the mycophagist is extinguishable. sent21: the fact that something is a kind of a u-turn but it is not a kind of a hoya is wrong if it is not exploratory. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that either it does not grease Dugongidae or it is not extinguishable or both is not true then the fact that the chevron is not a hoya is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that either the mycophagist does not grease Dugongidae or it is inextinguishable or both is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not grease Dugongidae and/or is not extinguishable does not hold.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the chevron is not a hoya.; sent3 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__