the butterfat is apologetic.
sent1: the rosilla is not fatty. sent2: the Junkers is not a colonizer if the fact that it is a kind of a teaberry and it is a kind of a colonizer is not correct. sent3: if the fact that something confers and is unapproachable is not right the fact that it does not stoke hold. sent4: the carthorse is not an ambulatory or it is a demand or both if the Junkers is not a kind of a colonizer. sent5: the fact that the Junkers is a teaberry and a colonizer is false. sent6: the fact that the lubricant does confer and it is unapproachable does not hold if that the marauder does not confer is true. sent7: the butterfat is not a kind of a teaberry if either the Junkers is not apologetic or it is a teaberry or both. sent8: the butterfat is apologetic if the lubricant does not stoke and it is not a kind of a demand. sent9: if the fact that something does stoke is not incorrect then that it does not confer and it is unapproachable is not right. sent10: the rosilla is not fatty and it is not a bang. sent11: if something does not confer then it does not stoke. sent12: the fact that the lubricant does not demand hold if the carthorse is non-ambulatory and/or it is a kind of a demand. sent13: the marauder does not confer if the rosilla is fatty but not a bang. sent14: if the carthorse is a demand the lubricant is not a demand. sent15: the lubricant is not a disinvestment. sent16: if the fact that something is apologetic thing that confers does not hold it does not confers. sent17: if the lubricant does not confer that it does not stoke is correct.
sent3 -> int1: the lubricant does not stoke if the fact that it confers and it is unapproachable is wrong.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the Junkers is not a colonizer.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the carthorse is not ambulatory or it does demand or both.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the lubricant does not demand.;
the carthorse stokes.
sent16 -> int5: if that the carthorse is apologetic and confers is not right it does not confers.;
$hypothesis$ = the butterfat is apologetic. ; $context$ = sent1: the rosilla is not fatty. sent2: the Junkers is not a colonizer if the fact that it is a kind of a teaberry and it is a kind of a colonizer is not correct. sent3: if the fact that something confers and is unapproachable is not right the fact that it does not stoke hold. sent4: the carthorse is not an ambulatory or it is a demand or both if the Junkers is not a kind of a colonizer. sent5: the fact that the Junkers is a teaberry and a colonizer is false. sent6: the fact that the lubricant does confer and it is unapproachable does not hold if that the marauder does not confer is true. sent7: the butterfat is not a kind of a teaberry if either the Junkers is not apologetic or it is a teaberry or both. sent8: the butterfat is apologetic if the lubricant does not stoke and it is not a kind of a demand. sent9: if the fact that something does stoke is not incorrect then that it does not confer and it is unapproachable is not right. sent10: the rosilla is not fatty and it is not a bang. sent11: if something does not confer then it does not stoke. sent12: the fact that the lubricant does not demand hold if the carthorse is non-ambulatory and/or it is a kind of a demand. sent13: the marauder does not confer if the rosilla is fatty but not a bang. sent14: if the carthorse is a demand the lubricant is not a demand. sent15: the lubricant is not a disinvestment. sent16: if the fact that something is apologetic thing that confers does not hold it does not confers. sent17: if the lubricant does not confer that it does not stoke is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the lubricant does not stoke if the fact that it confers and it is unapproachable is wrong.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the Junkers is not a colonizer.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the carthorse is not ambulatory or it does demand or both.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the lubricant does not demand.; __UNKNOWN__