the snatch is orthopedics and it does burglarize Helichrysum.
sent1: that the snatch does pelt and burglarizes Helichrysum is not right. sent2: if the snatch is not impressionistic it is not livable. sent3: the snatch is not impressionistic. sent4: there is nothing such that it pelts and it does burglarize Helichrysum. sent5: the snatch is a boardroom. sent6: the snatch is not livable. sent7: there exists nothing such that it pelts and does not burglarize Helichrysum. sent8: if the snatch is not impressionistic it is orthopedics and unlivable. sent9: the hope burglarizes saturation and is not orthopedics if it is not sacerdotal.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the snatch is orthopedics and unlivable is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the snatch is not non-orthopedics is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int3: that the snatch does pelt but it does not burglarize Helichrysum is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the snatch is orthopedics and it does burglarize Helichrysum. ; $context$ = sent1: that the snatch does pelt and burglarizes Helichrysum is not right. sent2: if the snatch is not impressionistic it is not livable. sent3: the snatch is not impressionistic. sent4: there is nothing such that it pelts and it does burglarize Helichrysum. sent5: the snatch is a boardroom. sent6: the snatch is not livable. sent7: there exists nothing such that it pelts and does not burglarize Helichrysum. sent8: if the snatch is not impressionistic it is orthopedics and unlivable. sent9: the hope burglarizes saturation and is not orthopedics if it is not sacerdotal. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the snatch is orthopedics and unlivable is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the snatch is not non-orthopedics is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int3: that the snatch does pelt but it does not burglarize Helichrysum is not right.; __UNKNOWN__