that the empyreanness happens and the mutating Shastan occurs is not correct.
sent1: the unethicalness leads to that the indenting does not occur. sent2: that the paralleling pro-lifer does not occur but the mutating Shastan happens is brought about by that the fantan does not occur. sent3: the contextualness occurs and the dichotomization happens. sent4: the unethicalness and/or the overbearing Martin happens if the medicine does not occur. sent5: if the Split does not occur then the bloomers occurs and the empyreanness happens. sent6: that the painfulness but not the surveillance occurs prevents that the indispensableness occurs. sent7: that both the empyreanness and the mutating Shastan happens is incorrect if the Split does not occur. sent8: the unshavenness occurs and the Beguine happens. sent9: if the indispensableness does not occur then the fact that not the fantan but the paralleling pro-lifer happens is wrong. sent10: if not the paralleling pro-lifer but the mutating Shastan happens that the Split does not occur hold. sent11: if the indenting does not occur both the handicraft and the vexing occurs. sent12: the paralleling pro-lifer occurs. sent13: the medicine does not occur. sent14: the mutating Shastan and the paralleling pro-lifer happens. sent15: the response and the broadsiding occurs. sent16: the unwinding does not occur if the handicraft and the eruption occurs. sent17: the Split occurs. sent18: the empyreanness and the Split occurs. sent19: that the unwinding does not occur yields that the painfulness but not the surveillance occurs.
sent18 -> int1: the empyreanness occurs.; sent14 -> int2: the mutating Shastan occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the bloomers happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the empyreanness happens and the mutating Shastan occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the unethicalness leads to that the indenting does not occur. sent2: that the paralleling pro-lifer does not occur but the mutating Shastan happens is brought about by that the fantan does not occur. sent3: the contextualness occurs and the dichotomization happens. sent4: the unethicalness and/or the overbearing Martin happens if the medicine does not occur. sent5: if the Split does not occur then the bloomers occurs and the empyreanness happens. sent6: that the painfulness but not the surveillance occurs prevents that the indispensableness occurs. sent7: that both the empyreanness and the mutating Shastan happens is incorrect if the Split does not occur. sent8: the unshavenness occurs and the Beguine happens. sent9: if the indispensableness does not occur then the fact that not the fantan but the paralleling pro-lifer happens is wrong. sent10: if not the paralleling pro-lifer but the mutating Shastan happens that the Split does not occur hold. sent11: if the indenting does not occur both the handicraft and the vexing occurs. sent12: the paralleling pro-lifer occurs. sent13: the medicine does not occur. sent14: the mutating Shastan and the paralleling pro-lifer happens. sent15: the response and the broadsiding occurs. sent16: the unwinding does not occur if the handicraft and the eruption occurs. sent17: the Split occurs. sent18: the empyreanness and the Split occurs. sent19: that the unwinding does not occur yields that the painfulness but not the surveillance occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the empyreanness occurs.; sent14 -> int2: the mutating Shastan occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__