that that the humming Colombian does not occur results in that the dunking python does not occur and the unconsciousness does not occur is wrong.
sent1: if that the dunking python and the non-unconsciousness happens is not right then that the drawling happens hold. sent2: if the fact that the imitativeness happens is false the fact that that the makeup does not occur and the hairiness happens is true is incorrect. sent3: if the mythologizing does not occur then the drawl does not occur and/or the humming Colombian does not occur. sent4: the drawl occurs if that the dunking python does not occur and the unconscious does not occur is not right. sent5: that the onstageness does not occur but the go-slow happens is wrong. sent6: the ropeiness happens if that not the makeup but the hairiness happens is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the mythologizing does not occur hold if the ropeiness happens. sent8: if the drawl happens then the humming Colombian happens. sent9: if that the overburden does not occur and the chyliferousness does not occur is not true the dunking acebutolol happens. sent10: if the dunking python does not occur and the unconsciousness does not occur then the fact that the drawling occurs is true. sent11: if the tonometry does not occur the conquest does not occur and the memberlessness does not occur. sent12: the unconsciousness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the dunking python does not occur and the unconscious does not occur is incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the drawl happens.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the humming Colombian occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the humming Colombian does not occur.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dunking python does not occur and the unconsciousness does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the conservancy does not occur and the humming lally does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that that the humming Colombian does not occur results in that the dunking python does not occur and the unconsciousness does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the dunking python and the non-unconsciousness happens is not right then that the drawling happens hold. sent2: if the fact that the imitativeness happens is false the fact that that the makeup does not occur and the hairiness happens is true is incorrect. sent3: if the mythologizing does not occur then the drawl does not occur and/or the humming Colombian does not occur. sent4: the drawl occurs if that the dunking python does not occur and the unconscious does not occur is not right. sent5: that the onstageness does not occur but the go-slow happens is wrong. sent6: the ropeiness happens if that not the makeup but the hairiness happens is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the mythologizing does not occur hold if the ropeiness happens. sent8: if the drawl happens then the humming Colombian happens. sent9: if that the overburden does not occur and the chyliferousness does not occur is not true the dunking acebutolol happens. sent10: if the dunking python does not occur and the unconsciousness does not occur then the fact that the drawling occurs is true. sent11: if the tonometry does not occur the conquest does not occur and the memberlessness does not occur. sent12: the unconsciousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the dunking python does not occur and the unconscious does not occur is incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the drawl happens.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the humming Colombian occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the humming Colombian does not occur.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dunking python does not occur and the unconsciousness does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__