the daiquiri does not enlighten.
sent1: that the timeserver is a kind of a satisfactoriness is not wrong. sent2: the timeserver is a Doha. sent3: the fact that the folate is not a satisfactoriness and/or does not contradistinguish tripe does not hold if the filling frets frowning. sent4: the timeserver is a termite. sent5: if that something enlightens and is not a termite is not correct then it does not enlightens. sent6: the folate does fret frowning if something that is a termite is a satisfactoriness. sent7: that the folate does enlighten is not false. sent8: if the folate does fret frowning the daiquiri does enlighten. sent9: the fact that the agate is not a known and/or contradistinguishes filling is false if it is a kind of a mutter. sent10: the agate is a mutter. sent11: there is something such that it is a kind of a termite. sent12: if that something is a perpetration is not false it frets frowning. sent13: that the timeserver is not a kind of a satisfactoriness hold if the fact that the folate either is not a satisfactoriness or does not contradistinguish tripe or both does not hold. sent14: something is a satisfactoriness.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the timeserver is a termite and a satisfactoriness.; int1 -> int2: something is a termite and it is a satisfactoriness.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the folate frets frowning.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the daiquiri does not enlighten.
sent5 -> int4: if the fact that the daiquiri does enlighten and is not a termite is false then it does not enlighten.; sent12 -> int5: the filling does fret frowning if it is a perpetration.; sent9 & sent10 -> int6: that the agate does not know and/or it does contradistinguish filling is not right.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is not a known or it contradistinguishes filling or both is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the daiquiri does not enlighten. ; $context$ = sent1: that the timeserver is a kind of a satisfactoriness is not wrong. sent2: the timeserver is a Doha. sent3: the fact that the folate is not a satisfactoriness and/or does not contradistinguish tripe does not hold if the filling frets frowning. sent4: the timeserver is a termite. sent5: if that something enlightens and is not a termite is not correct then it does not enlightens. sent6: the folate does fret frowning if something that is a termite is a satisfactoriness. sent7: that the folate does enlighten is not false. sent8: if the folate does fret frowning the daiquiri does enlighten. sent9: the fact that the agate is not a known and/or contradistinguishes filling is false if it is a kind of a mutter. sent10: the agate is a mutter. sent11: there is something such that it is a kind of a termite. sent12: if that something is a perpetration is not false it frets frowning. sent13: that the timeserver is not a kind of a satisfactoriness hold if the fact that the folate either is not a satisfactoriness or does not contradistinguish tripe or both does not hold. sent14: something is a satisfactoriness. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the timeserver is a termite and a satisfactoriness.; int1 -> int2: something is a termite and it is a satisfactoriness.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the folate frets frowning.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__