the formality does not occur.
sent1: if the euphemizing occurs then that the irruption does not occur and the embowering Tallchief does not occur is incorrect. sent2: the non-turbinateness is brought about by that not the queering but the Triassicness occurs. sent3: that the exhilarating churchgoer does not occur and the ushering boardinghouse does not occur is brought about by the non-Triassicness. sent4: if the Christologicalness happens then the turbinateness occurs. sent5: if the exhilarating churchgoer does not occur the fact that the Triassic occurs and the queering occurs is false. sent6: not the rigidness but the differentiation happens. sent7: the euphemizing occurs. sent8: if that the Triassicness happens and the queering happens does not hold the embowering Jude does not occur. sent9: the Christologicalness occurs if the fact that the fact that the irruption does not occur and the embowering Tallchief does not occur is not correct is not false. sent10: that the embowering Tallchief happens and the irruption happens prevents the Christologicalness. sent11: if both the non-rigidness and the differentiation occurs the queering does not occur. sent12: the fact that that the exhilarating churchgoer does not occur and the ushering boardinghouse does not occur is true prevents that the formality happens.
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: the queering does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Triassic happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the queering does not occur but the Triassic happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the turbinate does not occur.; sent1 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the irruption does not occur and the embowering Tallchief does not occur is wrong.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: that the Christologicalness occurs hold.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the turbinateness happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Triassic does not occur.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the exhilarating churchgoer does not occur and the ushering boardinghouse does not occur.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
not the embowering Jude but the approach happens.
$hypothesis$ = the formality does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the euphemizing occurs then that the irruption does not occur and the embowering Tallchief does not occur is incorrect. sent2: the non-turbinateness is brought about by that not the queering but the Triassicness occurs. sent3: that the exhilarating churchgoer does not occur and the ushering boardinghouse does not occur is brought about by the non-Triassicness. sent4: if the Christologicalness happens then the turbinateness occurs. sent5: if the exhilarating churchgoer does not occur the fact that the Triassic occurs and the queering occurs is false. sent6: not the rigidness but the differentiation happens. sent7: the euphemizing occurs. sent8: if that the Triassicness happens and the queering happens does not hold the embowering Jude does not occur. sent9: the Christologicalness occurs if the fact that the fact that the irruption does not occur and the embowering Tallchief does not occur is not correct is not false. sent10: that the embowering Tallchief happens and the irruption happens prevents the Christologicalness. sent11: if both the non-rigidness and the differentiation occurs the queering does not occur. sent12: the fact that that the exhilarating churchgoer does not occur and the ushering boardinghouse does not occur is true prevents that the formality happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: the queering does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Triassic happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the queering does not occur but the Triassic happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the turbinate does not occur.; sent1 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the irruption does not occur and the embowering Tallchief does not occur is wrong.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: that the Christologicalness occurs hold.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the turbinateness happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Triassic does not occur.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the exhilarating churchgoer does not occur and the ushering boardinghouse does not occur.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__