the kite is zoonotic.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Upanishad. sent2: the kite is a Pseudowintera. sent3: that the valsartan is zoonotic is not wrong. sent4: something is a catecholamine if it is cytophotometric. sent5: the fruitwood is a kind of a catecholamine. sent6: something does not blunt hip if that it is Nestorian thing that is a trave does not hold. sent7: the kite is a catecholamine and it is not non-grapelike. sent8: the kite is a catecholamine. sent9: the bureaucrat is zoonotic. sent10: the kite thrusts Mesa. sent11: the kite is Columbian if the fact that it is peaty is not false. sent12: something is cytophotometric if it is grapelike. sent13: if something is gonadal then it is a Polyodon. sent14: if the outfitter does not blunt hip then the fact that it does invigorate and it is not cytophotometric is incorrect. sent15: if the tremor is non-cytophotometric the gaucho is grapelike and it is a kind of a catecholamine. sent16: the kite is a kind of a blocker. sent17: that something is a catecholamine is correct if it is grapelike. sent18: something is zoonotic if it is cytophotometric. sent19: the princewood is a catecholamine. sent20: the Mesa does thrust epoxy and it is grapelike. sent21: if the gaucho is grapelike but it is not a kind of a catecholamine then the kite is not zoonotic.
sent7 -> int1: the kite is grapelike.; sent12 -> int2: if the kite is grapelike it is cytophotometric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the kite is not non-cytophotometric.; sent18 -> int4: the kite is not non-zoonotic if it is cytophotometric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the kite is not zoonotic.
$hypothesis$ = the kite is zoonotic. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Upanishad. sent2: the kite is a Pseudowintera. sent3: that the valsartan is zoonotic is not wrong. sent4: something is a catecholamine if it is cytophotometric. sent5: the fruitwood is a kind of a catecholamine. sent6: something does not blunt hip if that it is Nestorian thing that is a trave does not hold. sent7: the kite is a catecholamine and it is not non-grapelike. sent8: the kite is a catecholamine. sent9: the bureaucrat is zoonotic. sent10: the kite thrusts Mesa. sent11: the kite is Columbian if the fact that it is peaty is not false. sent12: something is cytophotometric if it is grapelike. sent13: if something is gonadal then it is a Polyodon. sent14: if the outfitter does not blunt hip then the fact that it does invigorate and it is not cytophotometric is incorrect. sent15: if the tremor is non-cytophotometric the gaucho is grapelike and it is a kind of a catecholamine. sent16: the kite is a kind of a blocker. sent17: that something is a catecholamine is correct if it is grapelike. sent18: something is zoonotic if it is cytophotometric. sent19: the princewood is a catecholamine. sent20: the Mesa does thrust epoxy and it is grapelike. sent21: if the gaucho is grapelike but it is not a kind of a catecholamine then the kite is not zoonotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the kite is grapelike.; sent12 -> int2: if the kite is grapelike it is cytophotometric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the kite is not non-cytophotometric.; sent18 -> int4: the kite is not non-zoonotic if it is cytophotometric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__