the parapodium is a Erlenmeyer but it is not a Listera.
sent1: something is not non-Cockney if it is a skeg. sent2: the Vinylite is not granuliferous. sent3: the Vinylite is not a skeg if the fact that the bushtit is not a kind of a Cockney and is not a pseudohermaphrodite is not right. sent4: if the bushtit is granuliferous then the laudator does not piddle and is not a kind of a Gallus. sent5: the Vinylite is not a skeg and does not damp AAS if the parapodium is a kind of a Erlenmeyer. sent6: the hitchrack does not damp AAS if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Erlenmeyer and is not Cockney. sent7: if the bushtit is not granuliferous that it is not a Cockney and it is a pseudohermaphrodite is not right. sent8: the fact that the bushtit is not Cockney but it is a pseudohermaphrodite is false. sent9: something rolls lunchroom if it is a Erlenmeyer. sent10: if there exists something such that it does piddle and is not a Gallus then the hitchrack does not roll lunchroom. sent11: if the Vinylite is not a skeg then the parapodium is not a Listera. sent12: something does roll lunchroom if it does damp AAS. sent13: the covert does not roll lunchroom. sent14: the hitchrack does damp AAS. sent15: the parapodium is not a Listera. sent16: if the hitchrack does not piddle the fact that that it does not damp AAS and it is not a Erlenmeyer is not incorrect is wrong. sent17: if something is not granuliferous then that it is a Erlenmeyer but not a Listera is not correct. sent18: the laudator mummifies Gerea but it is not a skeg. sent19: if that the hitchrack is a kind of non-granuliferous thing that does not roll lunchroom is not true the bushtit is not a pseudohermaphrodite. sent20: the hitchrack does not roll lunchroom if there is something such that it does not piddle and it is a Gallus. sent21: if the bushtit is a pseudohermaphrodite then the Vinylite is not a skeg. sent22: that the bushtit is non-Cockney thing that is not a pseudohermaphrodite is not right if that it is not granuliferous is not wrong. sent23: the parapodium is a kind of a Erlenmeyer but it is not a Listera if the Vinylite is not a skeg. sent24: The AAS does damp hitchrack. sent25: if the fact that the quadroon is granuliferous is not incorrect that the fact that it is not a kind of an attraction and it is not inaccurate hold is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bushtit is granuliferous.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the laudator does not piddle and is not a Gallus.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not piddle and is not a Gallus.; sent12 -> int3: the hitchrack does roll lunchroom if it damps AAS.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the hitchrack rolls lunchroom.;
the fact that the parapodium is a Erlenmeyer but it is not a Listera is not correct.
sent17 -> int5: if the parapodium is not granuliferous then the fact that it is a kind of a Erlenmeyer and it is not a Listera does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the parapodium is a Erlenmeyer but it is not a Listera. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not non-Cockney if it is a skeg. sent2: the Vinylite is not granuliferous. sent3: the Vinylite is not a skeg if the fact that the bushtit is not a kind of a Cockney and is not a pseudohermaphrodite is not right. sent4: if the bushtit is granuliferous then the laudator does not piddle and is not a kind of a Gallus. sent5: the Vinylite is not a skeg and does not damp AAS if the parapodium is a kind of a Erlenmeyer. sent6: the hitchrack does not damp AAS if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Erlenmeyer and is not Cockney. sent7: if the bushtit is not granuliferous that it is not a Cockney and it is a pseudohermaphrodite is not right. sent8: the fact that the bushtit is not Cockney but it is a pseudohermaphrodite is false. sent9: something rolls lunchroom if it is a Erlenmeyer. sent10: if there exists something such that it does piddle and is not a Gallus then the hitchrack does not roll lunchroom. sent11: if the Vinylite is not a skeg then the parapodium is not a Listera. sent12: something does roll lunchroom if it does damp AAS. sent13: the covert does not roll lunchroom. sent14: the hitchrack does damp AAS. sent15: the parapodium is not a Listera. sent16: if the hitchrack does not piddle the fact that that it does not damp AAS and it is not a Erlenmeyer is not incorrect is wrong. sent17: if something is not granuliferous then that it is a Erlenmeyer but not a Listera is not correct. sent18: the laudator mummifies Gerea but it is not a skeg. sent19: if that the hitchrack is a kind of non-granuliferous thing that does not roll lunchroom is not true the bushtit is not a pseudohermaphrodite. sent20: the hitchrack does not roll lunchroom if there is something such that it does not piddle and it is a Gallus. sent21: if the bushtit is a pseudohermaphrodite then the Vinylite is not a skeg. sent22: that the bushtit is non-Cockney thing that is not a pseudohermaphrodite is not right if that it is not granuliferous is not wrong. sent23: the parapodium is a kind of a Erlenmeyer but it is not a Listera if the Vinylite is not a skeg. sent24: The AAS does damp hitchrack. sent25: if the fact that the quadroon is granuliferous is not incorrect that the fact that it is not a kind of an attraction and it is not inaccurate hold is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bushtit is granuliferous.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the laudator does not piddle and is not a Gallus.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not piddle and is not a Gallus.; sent12 -> int3: the hitchrack does roll lunchroom if it damps AAS.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the hitchrack rolls lunchroom.; __UNKNOWN__