that that the handing Yosemite does not occur but the Philistine occurs is not true if the hierarchicalness happens is not correct.
sent1: if the minorness does not occur the fact that the non-nosohusialness and the inadequateness happens does not hold. sent2: the anaplasticness does not occur but the entomophilousness occurs. sent3: if the cornhusking occurs then the fact that that the Cromwellianness and the overstraining cine-camera occurs is correct is wrong. sent4: that the hierarchicalness happens is caused by that not the handing Yosemite but the Philistineness happens. sent5: the fact that the agnostic and the carillon occurs is not correct. sent6: if the greeting occurs not the overstraining plume but the Nordicness occurs. sent7: the nonhierarchicalness is triggered by that not the handing Yosemite but the Philistineness happens. sent8: that the fact that the advisableness and the treachery happens is right is false. sent9: that the handing Yosemite and the Philistine happens yields the non-hierarchicalness. sent10: the twinning does not occur if the fact that the golf but not the overstraining loaf occurs is wrong. sent11: the fact that the annoyance does not occur but the disabusing bellbird occurs is wrong if the nonsectarianness does not occur. sent12: the Baptisticness triggers that the nonsectarianness does not occur and the hierarchicalness does not occur. sent13: if the twin does not occur the magnetosphere happens and the minorness does not occur. sent14: if that not the nosohusialness but the inadequateness happens is not true that the Baptisticness occurs is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handing Yosemite does not occur but the Philistineness occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the hierarchicalness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hierarchicalness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the handing Yosemite but the Philistineness happens is false.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that not the annoyance but the disabusing bellbird happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that that the handing Yosemite does not occur but the Philistine occurs is not true if the hierarchicalness happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the minorness does not occur the fact that the non-nosohusialness and the inadequateness happens does not hold. sent2: the anaplasticness does not occur but the entomophilousness occurs. sent3: if the cornhusking occurs then the fact that that the Cromwellianness and the overstraining cine-camera occurs is correct is wrong. sent4: that the hierarchicalness happens is caused by that not the handing Yosemite but the Philistineness happens. sent5: the fact that the agnostic and the carillon occurs is not correct. sent6: if the greeting occurs not the overstraining plume but the Nordicness occurs. sent7: the nonhierarchicalness is triggered by that not the handing Yosemite but the Philistineness happens. sent8: that the fact that the advisableness and the treachery happens is right is false. sent9: that the handing Yosemite and the Philistine happens yields the non-hierarchicalness. sent10: the twinning does not occur if the fact that the golf but not the overstraining loaf occurs is wrong. sent11: the fact that the annoyance does not occur but the disabusing bellbird occurs is wrong if the nonsectarianness does not occur. sent12: the Baptisticness triggers that the nonsectarianness does not occur and the hierarchicalness does not occur. sent13: if the twin does not occur the magnetosphere happens and the minorness does not occur. sent14: if that not the nosohusialness but the inadequateness happens is not true that the Baptisticness occurs is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handing Yosemite does not occur but the Philistineness occurs.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the hierarchicalness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hierarchicalness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the handing Yosemite but the Philistineness happens is false.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__