there exists something such that if that it overturns slag and it is not a kind of a refectory is not right it barbarizes tetrasaccharide.
sent1: if the fact that something is not non-Christological but it is not a Protestant does not hold then it barbarizes tetrasaccharide. sent2: if the fact that something overturns slag but it is not a kind of a refectory is wrong it does barbarize tetrasaccharide. sent3: that there exists something such that if it is not acapnic then it is a transalpine is true. sent4: if something does overturn slag and is not a kind of a refectory then it does barbarize tetrasaccharide. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not arbitrative it is a kind of a referral. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it does overturn slag and is a refectory is not correct then it barbarizes tetrasaccharide.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the flagon overturns slag but it is not a refectory is not true it does barbarize tetrasaccharide.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the blackbuck does barbarize tetrasaccharide if that it is Christological and it is non-Protestant is not correct.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it overturns slag and it is not a kind of a refectory is not right it barbarizes tetrasaccharide. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not non-Christological but it is not a Protestant does not hold then it barbarizes tetrasaccharide. sent2: if the fact that something overturns slag but it is not a kind of a refectory is wrong it does barbarize tetrasaccharide. sent3: that there exists something such that if it is not acapnic then it is a transalpine is true. sent4: if something does overturn slag and is not a kind of a refectory then it does barbarize tetrasaccharide. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not arbitrative it is a kind of a referral. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it does overturn slag and is a refectory is not correct then it barbarizes tetrasaccharide. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the flagon overturns slag but it is not a refectory is not true it does barbarize tetrasaccharide.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__