there is something such that if it reflectorizes mastoidale then the fact that it does not reflectorize platoon and it is a pome is false.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a pulasan hold then that it is not anthracitic and draws EPA is false. sent2: if the cenobite reflectorizes mastoidale then that it does not reflectorize platoon and is a pome is not right. sent3: the fact that something does not reflectorize precipitin and is a nadir is not true if that it is trustworthy hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it does reflectorize precipitin then that it is not a kind of a shy and does reflectorize Berzelius does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it does tick then the fact that it is not a necrology but lunar is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it is concessive that it is not a vote but intralinguistic is not right. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a slash hold the fact that it does not gripe and it votes is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it does skirt then the fact that it is both not nebulous and concessive is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it reflectorizes mastoidale that it reflectorizes platoon and is a kind of a pome does not hold. sent10: if the cenobite does reflectorize mastoidale then it does not reflectorize platoon and is a kind of a pome. sent11: that the cenobite does reflectorize platoon and is a pome is not true if it reflectorizes mastoidale. sent12: there exists something such that if it does reflectorize mastoidale it does not reflectorize platoon and is a pome. sent13: the fact that the Pullman does not reflectorize mastoidale and is a smart is not right if it is a kind of a vote.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is trustworthy the fact that it does not reflectorize precipitin and it is a nadir does not hold.
sent3 -> int1: that the means does not reflectorize precipitin and is a nadir is not right if it is trustworthy.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it reflectorizes mastoidale then the fact that it does not reflectorize platoon and it is a pome is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a pulasan hold then that it is not anthracitic and draws EPA is false. sent2: if the cenobite reflectorizes mastoidale then that it does not reflectorize platoon and is a pome is not right. sent3: the fact that something does not reflectorize precipitin and is a nadir is not true if that it is trustworthy hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it does reflectorize precipitin then that it is not a kind of a shy and does reflectorize Berzelius does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it does tick then the fact that it is not a necrology but lunar is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it is concessive that it is not a vote but intralinguistic is not right. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a slash hold the fact that it does not gripe and it votes is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it does skirt then the fact that it is both not nebulous and concessive is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it reflectorizes mastoidale that it reflectorizes platoon and is a kind of a pome does not hold. sent10: if the cenobite does reflectorize mastoidale then it does not reflectorize platoon and is a kind of a pome. sent11: that the cenobite does reflectorize platoon and is a pome is not true if it reflectorizes mastoidale. sent12: there exists something such that if it does reflectorize mastoidale it does not reflectorize platoon and is a pome. sent13: the fact that the Pullman does not reflectorize mastoidale and is a smart is not right if it is a kind of a vote. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__