the RNA is angular.
sent1: there exists something such that it evanesces and it is not a sleet. sent2: something does not evanesce and it does not sleet if it does not include. sent3: if that the Kiwi is a kind of a colonic and/or is an entomologist does not hold then that the RNA is angular is not incorrect. sent4: the ETD is a kind of a trip if the photojournalist is not a visor. sent5: if something that does not evanesce does not sleet then the photojournalist is not a visor. sent6: a trip is impenitent. sent7: the RNA is angular if the fact that the Kiwi is colonic and/or it is not an entomologist does not hold. sent8: the EPROM does not include if the fact that either something is a kind of a colonic or it is not an entomologist or both is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Kiwi is a colonic or is not a kind of an entomologist or both hold.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a colonic and/or it is not an entomologist hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the EPROM does not include.; sent2 -> int3: the EPROM does not evanesce and it does not sleet if it does not include.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the EPROM does not evanesce and it does not sleet hold.; int4 -> int5: something does not evanesce and is not a sleet.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the photojournalist is not a visor.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the ETD is a trip.; sent6 -> int8: the ETD is impenitent if it trips.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the ETD is impenitent.;
$hypothesis$ = the RNA is angular. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it evanesces and it is not a sleet. sent2: something does not evanesce and it does not sleet if it does not include. sent3: if that the Kiwi is a kind of a colonic and/or is an entomologist does not hold then that the RNA is angular is not incorrect. sent4: the ETD is a kind of a trip if the photojournalist is not a visor. sent5: if something that does not evanesce does not sleet then the photojournalist is not a visor. sent6: a trip is impenitent. sent7: the RNA is angular if the fact that the Kiwi is colonic and/or it is not an entomologist does not hold. sent8: the EPROM does not include if the fact that either something is a kind of a colonic or it is not an entomologist or both is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Kiwi is a colonic or is not a kind of an entomologist or both hold.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a colonic and/or it is not an entomologist hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the EPROM does not include.; sent2 -> int3: the EPROM does not evanesce and it does not sleet if it does not include.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the EPROM does not evanesce and it does not sleet hold.; int4 -> int5: something does not evanesce and is not a sleet.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the photojournalist is not a visor.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the ETD is a trip.; sent6 -> int8: the ETD is impenitent if it trips.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the ETD is impenitent.; __UNKNOWN__