that the antagonisticness and the desirousness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the scopalness happens. sent2: if the scopalness does not occur that the antagonisticness occurs and the desirousness occurs does not hold. sent3: the oppression occurs and the enskying snatcher happens if the mercantilism does not occur. sent4: if the enskying snatcher does not occur then the desirousness and the oppression occurs. sent5: the non-Muhammadanness is prevented by that the scopalness happens. sent6: the felineness occurs and the gladiatorialness happens. sent7: the rustling occurs. sent8: the antagonisticness occurs if the Muhammadanness occurs. sent9: the enskying snatcher does not occur.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the Muhammadanness occurs is right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the antagonisticness occurs.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: both the desirousness and the oppression happens.; int3 -> int4: the desirousness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the antagonisticness and the desirousness occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = that the antagonisticness and the desirousness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the scopalness happens. sent2: if the scopalness does not occur that the antagonisticness occurs and the desirousness occurs does not hold. sent3: the oppression occurs and the enskying snatcher happens if the mercantilism does not occur. sent4: if the enskying snatcher does not occur then the desirousness and the oppression occurs. sent5: the non-Muhammadanness is prevented by that the scopalness happens. sent6: the felineness occurs and the gladiatorialness happens. sent7: the rustling occurs. sent8: the antagonisticness occurs if the Muhammadanness occurs. sent9: the enskying snatcher does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the Muhammadanness occurs is right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the antagonisticness occurs.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: both the desirousness and the oppression happens.; int3 -> int4: the desirousness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__