that there is something such that it does parody optometrist and it does not tingle does not hold.
sent1: the sparrow impregnates but it is not a toadshade. sent2: the brakes is unavailable if the fact that it is not a toadshade is correct. sent3: the thunderbolt tingles. sent4: the fact that something is a counterbalance that is a kind of a recission is not correct if it does not tingle. sent5: something is a kind of unavailable thing that does parody optometrist if that it is a kind of a toadshade is not true. sent6: that the thunderbolt is not a counterbalance hold if the fact that there is something such that the fact that it denaturalizes Plutarch and does surrender does not hold hold. sent7: the sparrow is not a counterbalance but it does impregnate if the thunderbolt is not a kind of a counterbalance. sent8: everything is not a kind of a toadshade. sent9: if that something is a counterbalance that is a kind of a recission is not correct it is not a recission. sent10: the host does impregnate. sent11: there exists something such that that it does denaturalize Plutarch and it is a surrender is false. sent12: if the sparrow is not a counterbalance but it impregnates then the brakes does not tingle.
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: that the thunderbolt is not a counterbalance is right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the sparrow is not a counterbalance but it does impregnate.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the brakes does not tingle.; sent5 -> int4: the brakes is unavailable and it does parody optometrist if it is not a toadshade.; sent8 -> int5: the brakes is not a toadshade.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the brakes is unavailable and it does parody optometrist.; int6 -> int7: the brakes does parody optometrist.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the brakes does parody optometrist and does not tingle.; int8 -> hypothesis;
everything is not a recission.
sent9 -> int9: that the thunderbolt is not the recission if that the thunderbolt is a counterbalance and is a recission does not hold is correct.; sent4 -> int10: that the sparrow is a counterbalance and it is a recission is incorrect if it does not tingle.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that it does parody optometrist and it does not tingle does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the sparrow impregnates but it is not a toadshade. sent2: the brakes is unavailable if the fact that it is not a toadshade is correct. sent3: the thunderbolt tingles. sent4: the fact that something is a counterbalance that is a kind of a recission is not correct if it does not tingle. sent5: something is a kind of unavailable thing that does parody optometrist if that it is a kind of a toadshade is not true. sent6: that the thunderbolt is not a counterbalance hold if the fact that there is something such that the fact that it denaturalizes Plutarch and does surrender does not hold hold. sent7: the sparrow is not a counterbalance but it does impregnate if the thunderbolt is not a kind of a counterbalance. sent8: everything is not a kind of a toadshade. sent9: if that something is a counterbalance that is a kind of a recission is not correct it is not a recission. sent10: the host does impregnate. sent11: there exists something such that that it does denaturalize Plutarch and it is a surrender is false. sent12: if the sparrow is not a counterbalance but it impregnates then the brakes does not tingle. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent6 -> int1: that the thunderbolt is not a counterbalance is right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the sparrow is not a counterbalance but it does impregnate.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the brakes does not tingle.; sent5 -> int4: the brakes is unavailable and it does parody optometrist if it is not a toadshade.; sent8 -> int5: the brakes is not a toadshade.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the brakes is unavailable and it does parody optometrist.; int6 -> int7: the brakes does parody optometrist.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the brakes does parody optometrist and does not tingle.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__