the latecomer does not subtilize Samson.
sent1: the fact that something is untidy but not denotative is not right if it is not an annuity. sent2: The economy does not subtilize blastocoel. sent3: if the Fossa is not an annuity the fact that it is untidy and is denotative does not hold. sent4: the cachalot is not a pansexual if there exists something such that that it is untidy and not denotative is wrong. sent5: the Fossa is not a kind of an annuity if the blastocoel does appropriate realgar. sent6: if the blastocoel does not subtilize economy then it is not a adnexa and/or it appropriates realgar. sent7: if the cachalot is not a kind of a pansexual that the lithosphere is not a kind of a pansexual and it is not Vedic does not hold. sent8: something subtilizes Samson but it does not appropriate realgar. sent9: if the blastocoel is not a kind of a adnexa and/or does appropriate realgar then the fact that the Fossa is not an annuity is right. sent10: the blastocoel does not subtilize economy. sent11: if the fact that the lithosphere is not a pansexual and not Vedic is not true the latecomer does not subtilize Samson.
sent6 & sent10 -> int1: the blastocoel is not a adnexa or does appropriate realgar or both.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Fossa is not a kind of an annuity.; sent1 -> int3: the fact that the Fossa is untidy but not denotative is wrong if that it is not an annuity hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the Fossa is untidy and is not denotative is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is untidy and it is non-denotative is wrong.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the cachalot is not a pansexual.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the lithosphere is not a pansexual and is not Vedic is incorrect.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the latecomer does not subtilize Samson. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is untidy but not denotative is not right if it is not an annuity. sent2: The economy does not subtilize blastocoel. sent3: if the Fossa is not an annuity the fact that it is untidy and is denotative does not hold. sent4: the cachalot is not a pansexual if there exists something such that that it is untidy and not denotative is wrong. sent5: the Fossa is not a kind of an annuity if the blastocoel does appropriate realgar. sent6: if the blastocoel does not subtilize economy then it is not a adnexa and/or it appropriates realgar. sent7: if the cachalot is not a kind of a pansexual that the lithosphere is not a kind of a pansexual and it is not Vedic does not hold. sent8: something subtilizes Samson but it does not appropriate realgar. sent9: if the blastocoel is not a kind of a adnexa and/or does appropriate realgar then the fact that the Fossa is not an annuity is right. sent10: the blastocoel does not subtilize economy. sent11: if the fact that the lithosphere is not a pansexual and not Vedic is not true the latecomer does not subtilize Samson. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent10 -> int1: the blastocoel is not a adnexa or does appropriate realgar or both.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Fossa is not a kind of an annuity.; sent1 -> int3: the fact that the Fossa is untidy but not denotative is wrong if that it is not an annuity hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the Fossa is untidy and is not denotative is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is untidy and it is non-denotative is wrong.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the cachalot is not a pansexual.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the lithosphere is not a pansexual and is not Vedic is incorrect.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__