the comfrey is a hemline and it is horary.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a hemline and it is not a cylindricality the thong tunnels TSS. sent2: if there is something such that that that it is not a kind of a Burr and is a kind of a overanxiety is not incorrect is incorrect then the smiler is not a overanxiety. sent3: the comfrey is horary if it is a overanxiety. sent4: either the hematocrit does not junketeer or it does not tunnel Pipidae or both if it does own antiestablishmentarianism. sent5: if the thong is a cylindricality then the comfrey is a cylindricality. sent6: if something does not junketeer it is not a cylindricality. sent7: that the handrest owns antiestablishmentarianism but it does not tunnel Pipidae is not right. sent8: the hematocrit owns antiestablishmentarianism. sent9: the comfrey is a overanxiety. sent10: if there exists something such that it does not junketeer then the thong does not junketeer or it does not tunnel TSS or both. sent11: if something is a cylindricality then the fact that it is not a hemline and it does not tunnel Pipidae is not right. sent12: if the thong tunnels TSS then that the hematocrit does junketeer is not false. sent13: if the fact that the comfrey is not a hemline and does not tunnel Pipidae is not right the moonbeam does not tunnel Pipidae. sent14: if there exists something such that it does not own antiestablishmentarianism and it is horary the hematocrit does not junketeer. sent15: that the fact that either the bignoniad is not psychomotor or it is a kind of a viceroyalty or both is right is not right if it is Dostoevskian. sent16: if the fact that the bignoniad is not psychomotor and/or it is a viceroyalty does not hold the handrest is psychomotor. sent17: the bignoniad is Dostoevskian. sent18: the comfrey is not a cylindricality. sent19: that the smiler owns antiestablishmentarianism is not incorrect if the hematocrit junketeers. sent20: the fact that the handrest is not a Burr but it is a overanxiety is not true if it is not non-psychomotor.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the comfrey is not a hemline.; assump1 & sent18 -> int1: the comfrey is not a hemline and it is not a cylindricality.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a kind of a hemline and it is not a cylindricality.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the thong tunnels TSS.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the hematocrit junketeers.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the smiler owns antiestablishmentarianism.; sent7 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it owns antiestablishmentarianism and it does not tunnel Pipidae is false.; sent3 & sent9 -> int7: the comfrey is horary.;
the moonbeam does not tunnel Pipidae.
sent11 -> int8: that the comfrey is not a kind of a hemline and it does not tunnel Pipidae is false if the fact that it is a cylindricality hold.; sent15 & sent17 -> int9: that either the bignoniad is not psychomotor or it is a viceroyalty or both is false.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the handrest is psychomotor.; sent20 & int10 -> int11: that the handrest is not a Burr but it is a overanxiety does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Burr and it is a overanxiety is wrong.; int12 & sent2 -> int13: the smiler is not a kind of a overanxiety.;
$hypothesis$ = the comfrey is a hemline and it is horary. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a hemline and it is not a cylindricality the thong tunnels TSS. sent2: if there is something such that that that it is not a kind of a Burr and is a kind of a overanxiety is not incorrect is incorrect then the smiler is not a overanxiety. sent3: the comfrey is horary if it is a overanxiety. sent4: either the hematocrit does not junketeer or it does not tunnel Pipidae or both if it does own antiestablishmentarianism. sent5: if the thong is a cylindricality then the comfrey is a cylindricality. sent6: if something does not junketeer it is not a cylindricality. sent7: that the handrest owns antiestablishmentarianism but it does not tunnel Pipidae is not right. sent8: the hematocrit owns antiestablishmentarianism. sent9: the comfrey is a overanxiety. sent10: if there exists something such that it does not junketeer then the thong does not junketeer or it does not tunnel TSS or both. sent11: if something is a cylindricality then the fact that it is not a hemline and it does not tunnel Pipidae is not right. sent12: if the thong tunnels TSS then that the hematocrit does junketeer is not false. sent13: if the fact that the comfrey is not a hemline and does not tunnel Pipidae is not right the moonbeam does not tunnel Pipidae. sent14: if there exists something such that it does not own antiestablishmentarianism and it is horary the hematocrit does not junketeer. sent15: that the fact that either the bignoniad is not psychomotor or it is a kind of a viceroyalty or both is right is not right if it is Dostoevskian. sent16: if the fact that the bignoniad is not psychomotor and/or it is a viceroyalty does not hold the handrest is psychomotor. sent17: the bignoniad is Dostoevskian. sent18: the comfrey is not a cylindricality. sent19: that the smiler owns antiestablishmentarianism is not incorrect if the hematocrit junketeers. sent20: the fact that the handrest is not a Burr but it is a overanxiety is not true if it is not non-psychomotor. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the comfrey is not a hemline.; assump1 & sent18 -> int1: the comfrey is not a hemline and it is not a cylindricality.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a kind of a hemline and it is not a cylindricality.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the thong tunnels TSS.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the hematocrit junketeers.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the smiler owns antiestablishmentarianism.; sent7 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it owns antiestablishmentarianism and it does not tunnel Pipidae is false.; sent3 & sent9 -> int7: the comfrey is horary.; __UNKNOWN__