the pneumonicness occurs.
sent1: that the mend occurs prevents that the supernaturalness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the fact that not the things but the Comstockery occurs does not hold hold the scourging priorship does not occur. sent3: that the trim does not occur triggers the countermarch. sent4: if that both the vaulting antihero and the non-jihadiness occurs does not hold then the vaulting antihero does not occur. sent5: either the medium does not occur or the countermarching does not occur or both if the Wagnerianness does not occur. sent6: if that the luging does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness does not occur does not hold the scourging priorship happens. sent7: if the countermarching occurs the Wagnerian happens. sent8: that the Comstockery does not occur is triggered by the incorporation. sent9: the medium occurs if the Wagnerianness happens. sent10: if the vaulting antihero does not occur the incorporation and the vaulting former occurs. sent11: the purifying aftertaste does not occur and the unloading does not occur. sent12: the trimming does not occur if the luging does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness does not occur. sent13: that the things does not occur and the Comstockery happens is not right. sent14: both the non-Wagnerianness and the non-pneumonicness occurs if that the things does not occur is not false. sent15: if the fact that the scourging priorship does not occur and the trimming does not occur is wrong the pneumonicness does not occur. sent16: the pneumonicness happens if the medium occurs. sent17: the luging does not occur. sent18: the fact that the things does not occur hold if the Comstockery does not occur. sent19: the vaulting Szell happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the luging does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness does not occur is incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the scourging priorship occurs.; sent2 & sent13 -> int2: the scourging priorship does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the luging does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness does not occur.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the trimming does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the countermarching occurs hold.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Wagnerian happens.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the medium occurs.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the pneumonicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the pneumonicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mend occurs prevents that the supernaturalness does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the fact that not the things but the Comstockery occurs does not hold hold the scourging priorship does not occur. sent3: that the trim does not occur triggers the countermarch. sent4: if that both the vaulting antihero and the non-jihadiness occurs does not hold then the vaulting antihero does not occur. sent5: either the medium does not occur or the countermarching does not occur or both if the Wagnerianness does not occur. sent6: if that the luging does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness does not occur does not hold the scourging priorship happens. sent7: if the countermarching occurs the Wagnerian happens. sent8: that the Comstockery does not occur is triggered by the incorporation. sent9: the medium occurs if the Wagnerianness happens. sent10: if the vaulting antihero does not occur the incorporation and the vaulting former occurs. sent11: the purifying aftertaste does not occur and the unloading does not occur. sent12: the trimming does not occur if the luging does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness does not occur. sent13: that the things does not occur and the Comstockery happens is not right. sent14: both the non-Wagnerianness and the non-pneumonicness occurs if that the things does not occur is not false. sent15: if the fact that the scourging priorship does not occur and the trimming does not occur is wrong the pneumonicness does not occur. sent16: the pneumonicness happens if the medium occurs. sent17: the luging does not occur. sent18: the fact that the things does not occur hold if the Comstockery does not occur. sent19: the vaulting Szell happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the luging does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness does not occur is incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the scourging priorship occurs.; sent2 & sent13 -> int2: the scourging priorship does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the luging does not occur and the Anglo-catholicness does not occur.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the trimming does not occur.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the countermarching occurs hold.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Wagnerian happens.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the medium occurs.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__