the cattalo executes and is gerundial.
sent1: something does not cloister Sigyn. sent2: there exists something such that it is gerundial and it does not sermonize cattalo. sent3: something is a kind of adventuristic thing that is a bluestone. sent4: that the napoleon sermonizes cattalo and it executes is not right. sent5: something is infinitival but it is not albitic. sent6: something is gerundial and it does execute. sent7: the fact that the napoleon does sermonize cattalo and is gerundial is wrong. sent8: that the cattalo does sermonize cattalo and it does execute is false. sent9: something executes and is gerundial. sent10: the fact that the cattalo executes and it does sermonize cattalo is false. sent11: the fact that the napoleon sermonizes cattalo and it is gerundial does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it executes hold. sent12: there are topping things. sent13: there is something such that it executes. sent14: if something does not sermonize cattalo then it executes and it is gerundial. sent15: the fact that something does not execute and it does not barbarize is wrong if it does not sermonize cattalo. sent16: the fact that the cattalo executes and is gerundial is incorrect if something does sermonize cattalo. sent17: that that the napoleon is gerundial and it does sermonize cattalo hold is false if there is something such that it executes. sent18: the napoleon does sermonize cattalo if there is something such that it is infinitival and it is not albitic. sent19: there is something such that it is gerundial. sent20: if there is something such that it is infinitival and it is albitic the napoleon does sermonize cattalo. sent21: if there exists something such that it is gerundial and it does not execute the cattalo sermonizes cattalo. sent22: something barbarizes if the fact that it does not execute and it does not barbarizes is wrong.
sent5 & sent18 -> int1: that the napoleon does sermonize cattalo is correct.; int1 -> int2: something does sermonize cattalo.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the cattalo executes and it is gerundial.
sent14 -> int3: the cattalo executes and is gerundial if it does not sermonize cattalo.;
$hypothesis$ = the cattalo executes and is gerundial. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not cloister Sigyn. sent2: there exists something such that it is gerundial and it does not sermonize cattalo. sent3: something is a kind of adventuristic thing that is a bluestone. sent4: that the napoleon sermonizes cattalo and it executes is not right. sent5: something is infinitival but it is not albitic. sent6: something is gerundial and it does execute. sent7: the fact that the napoleon does sermonize cattalo and is gerundial is wrong. sent8: that the cattalo does sermonize cattalo and it does execute is false. sent9: something executes and is gerundial. sent10: the fact that the cattalo executes and it does sermonize cattalo is false. sent11: the fact that the napoleon sermonizes cattalo and it is gerundial does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it executes hold. sent12: there are topping things. sent13: there is something such that it executes. sent14: if something does not sermonize cattalo then it executes and it is gerundial. sent15: the fact that something does not execute and it does not barbarize is wrong if it does not sermonize cattalo. sent16: the fact that the cattalo executes and is gerundial is incorrect if something does sermonize cattalo. sent17: that that the napoleon is gerundial and it does sermonize cattalo hold is false if there is something such that it executes. sent18: the napoleon does sermonize cattalo if there is something such that it is infinitival and it is not albitic. sent19: there is something such that it is gerundial. sent20: if there is something such that it is infinitival and it is albitic the napoleon does sermonize cattalo. sent21: if there exists something such that it is gerundial and it does not execute the cattalo sermonizes cattalo. sent22: something barbarizes if the fact that it does not execute and it does not barbarizes is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent18 -> int1: that the napoleon does sermonize cattalo is correct.; int1 -> int2: something does sermonize cattalo.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__