the vocativeness does not occur if that the elbowing vocalism happens is not incorrect.
sent1: if the Depression happens then the plumbicness does not occur and the entertaining does not occur. sent2: the vocative does not occur if the apteralness happens. sent3: that the apteralness happens and/or the elbowing vocalism happens leads to the vocativeness. sent4: the elbowing Nevelson does not occur if that both the elbowing Nevelson and the objecting occurs is not right. sent5: the Modernness happens. sent6: the fact that the sensibleness happens and the frolicking butacaine occurs is wrong if the elbowing Nevelson does not occur. sent7: if the emplacement does not occur then the vocative occurs. sent8: if the elbowing vocalism occurs the vocativeness happens. sent9: if the unidentifiableness does not occur the Depression occurs and the forgery happens. sent10: the vocative occurs. sent11: the frolicking mulligan or the act or both happens. sent12: the emoting happens and the officializing Alexander happens if the plumbicness does not occur. sent13: the engineering happens if the apteralness happens. sent14: that the emoting occurs and the vocative occurs leads to that the elbowing vocalism does not occur. sent15: the emplacement does not occur if the fact that both the sensibleness and the frolicking butacaine happens is not correct. sent16: that the vocative happens is prevented by either that the apteralness occurs or that the elbowing vocalism occurs or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the elbowing vocalism happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the apteralness occurs or the elbowing vocalism occurs or both.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the vocative does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the engineering happens.
$hypothesis$ = the vocativeness does not occur if that the elbowing vocalism happens is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Depression happens then the plumbicness does not occur and the entertaining does not occur. sent2: the vocative does not occur if the apteralness happens. sent3: that the apteralness happens and/or the elbowing vocalism happens leads to the vocativeness. sent4: the elbowing Nevelson does not occur if that both the elbowing Nevelson and the objecting occurs is not right. sent5: the Modernness happens. sent6: the fact that the sensibleness happens and the frolicking butacaine occurs is wrong if the elbowing Nevelson does not occur. sent7: if the emplacement does not occur then the vocative occurs. sent8: if the elbowing vocalism occurs the vocativeness happens. sent9: if the unidentifiableness does not occur the Depression occurs and the forgery happens. sent10: the vocative occurs. sent11: the frolicking mulligan or the act or both happens. sent12: the emoting happens and the officializing Alexander happens if the plumbicness does not occur. sent13: the engineering happens if the apteralness happens. sent14: that the emoting occurs and the vocative occurs leads to that the elbowing vocalism does not occur. sent15: the emplacement does not occur if the fact that both the sensibleness and the frolicking butacaine happens is not correct. sent16: that the vocative happens is prevented by either that the apteralness occurs or that the elbowing vocalism occurs or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the elbowing vocalism happens.; assump1 -> int1: either the apteralness occurs or the elbowing vocalism occurs or both.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the vocative does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__