the fact that that the coating plight happens is correct if the normotensiveness happens is incorrect.
sent1: that that the argenticness happens but the reddening lota does not occur is right is false if the coating pasang does not occur. sent2: the reddening castle does not occur if both the normotensiveness and the Reformation occurs. sent3: if the fact that the argenticness occurs and the reddening lota does not occur is false the coating plight occurs. sent4: the fact that the torchlight does not occur is not incorrect if the refutation occurs and the primateship occurs. sent5: the Reformation happens. sent6: the radiance occurs. sent7: if the reddening castle does not occur and/or the mastership does not occur the coating pasang does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the normotensiveness but not the Reformation occurs is wrong then the conflagration occurs. sent9: the annual happens and the patch occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the normotensiveness happens hold.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: both the normotensiveness and the Reformation occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the reddening castle does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the reddening castle does not occur and/or the mastership does not occur.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the coating pasang does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the argenticness occurs but the reddening lota does not occur is not true.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the coating plight occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the conflagration happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the coating plight happens is correct if the normotensiveness happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the argenticness happens but the reddening lota does not occur is right is false if the coating pasang does not occur. sent2: the reddening castle does not occur if both the normotensiveness and the Reformation occurs. sent3: if the fact that the argenticness occurs and the reddening lota does not occur is false the coating plight occurs. sent4: the fact that the torchlight does not occur is not incorrect if the refutation occurs and the primateship occurs. sent5: the Reformation happens. sent6: the radiance occurs. sent7: if the reddening castle does not occur and/or the mastership does not occur the coating pasang does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the normotensiveness but not the Reformation occurs is wrong then the conflagration occurs. sent9: the annual happens and the patch occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the normotensiveness happens hold.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: both the normotensiveness and the Reformation occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the reddening castle does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the reddening castle does not occur and/or the mastership does not occur.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the coating pasang does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the argenticness occurs but the reddening lota does not occur is not true.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the coating plight occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__