the buteonine is not a decline.
sent1: if something is retrorse then it bows ratepayer. sent2: if the fact that something is both a snicker and not a footer is not right it is not a decline. sent3: something is not worse if that it is a Doomsday and it does not normalize zarf is not correct. sent4: something that is not a footer but non-amenorrheic is not a snicker. sent5: something that does bow huck and is not retrorse is a kind of a decline. sent6: the ratepayer bows ratepayer if it is retrorse. sent7: that something is a baton and is not amenorrheic is not true if the fact that it is not retrorse hold. sent8: the buteonine does bow huck but it is not retrorse if the Leonberg does snicker. sent9: the buteonine does not bow ratepayer. sent10: the ratepayer is retrorse if it is a damages. sent11: that something is a snicker but not a footer is not true if the fact that it does not bow huck is not wrong. sent12: that something does bow ratepayer and is not a kind of a Phasianus is not false if it is retrorse. sent13: if something damages then it is not a footer and is not amenorrheic. sent14: if something does not bow huck then that it is a snicker and it is a footer is false. sent15: if something that bows ratepayer is not a Phasianus the buteonine does not bow huck. sent16: that the ratepayer is not amenorrheic and it is not a kind of a damages is incorrect.
sent12 -> int1: if the ratepayer is retrorse then it does bow ratepayer and is not a Phasianus.; sent11 -> int2: that the buteonine is a snicker but it is not a footer is not correct if it does not bow huck.; sent2 -> int3: the buteonine is not a decline if the fact that it snickers and it is not a footer is not true.;
that the darts is a baton but it is not amenorrheic is not correct.
sent7 -> int4: that the darts is both a baton and not amenorrheic is not right if it is not retrorse.;
$hypothesis$ = the buteonine is not a decline. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is retrorse then it bows ratepayer. sent2: if the fact that something is both a snicker and not a footer is not right it is not a decline. sent3: something is not worse if that it is a Doomsday and it does not normalize zarf is not correct. sent4: something that is not a footer but non-amenorrheic is not a snicker. sent5: something that does bow huck and is not retrorse is a kind of a decline. sent6: the ratepayer bows ratepayer if it is retrorse. sent7: that something is a baton and is not amenorrheic is not true if the fact that it is not retrorse hold. sent8: the buteonine does bow huck but it is not retrorse if the Leonberg does snicker. sent9: the buteonine does not bow ratepayer. sent10: the ratepayer is retrorse if it is a damages. sent11: that something is a snicker but not a footer is not true if the fact that it does not bow huck is not wrong. sent12: that something does bow ratepayer and is not a kind of a Phasianus is not false if it is retrorse. sent13: if something damages then it is not a footer and is not amenorrheic. sent14: if something does not bow huck then that it is a snicker and it is a footer is false. sent15: if something that bows ratepayer is not a Phasianus the buteonine does not bow huck. sent16: that the ratepayer is not amenorrheic and it is not a kind of a damages is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the ratepayer is retrorse then it does bow ratepayer and is not a Phasianus.; sent11 -> int2: that the buteonine is a snicker but it is not a footer is not correct if it does not bow huck.; sent2 -> int3: the buteonine is not a decline if the fact that it snickers and it is not a footer is not true.; __UNKNOWN__