that there is something such that that it is not noncellular and it is not a Saurosuchus does not hold is not correct.
sent1: if the antiflatulent does not nag eyeliner and is a U then it is not a Lens. sent2: if the azurite is not a strung that it is not a Lens and it nags eyeliner is wrong. sent3: that the antiflatulent is non-mensural thing that does not nag eyeliner is wrong. sent4: if something does not nag doo-wop the fact that it is not a kind of a disorientation and it is not brunet does not hold. sent5: if the antiflatulent is not a Lens the fact that the azurite is a kind of a strung but it does not nag doo-wop does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it nags doo-wop and is not a kind of a Saurosuchus is incorrect. sent7: either the sorceress is a brunet or it is not a kind of a disorientation or both if the arrowroot is not a kind of a disorientation. sent8: the antiflatulent is a Lens or it does not nag doo-wop or both. sent9: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a disorientation and it is a Saurosuchus is not right. sent10: the sorceress tarnishes azurite. sent11: that the shopfront is a kind of a disorientation that is not mensural does not hold. sent12: the fact that the arrowroot is both not a disorientation and a brunet is not correct. sent13: the antiflatulent does not nag eyeliner and is a U. sent14: if the sorceress is a brunet or not a disorientation or both the fact that the shopfront is not mensural is true. sent15: the fact that something does not nag doo-wop but it is noncellular is wrong if it is not a disorientation. sent16: if something is not a coupling and is a kind of a strung then that it is not basal is right. sent17: if that the azurite does string and does not nag doo-wop is not true then the arrowroot is not a kind of a disorientation. sent18: if the fact that the arrowroot is a disorientation but not a strung does not hold the fact that the azurite is not brunet is not wrong. sent19: if something is not mensural the fact that it is both not noncellular and not a Saurosuchus is wrong.
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the antiflatulent is not a Lens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the azurite is a strung but it does not nag doo-wop is not true.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the arrowroot is not a disorientation.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the sorceress is a kind of a brunet and/or it is not a disorientation.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the shopfront is not mensural.; sent19 -> int6: that the shopfront is non-noncellular thing that is not a kind of a Saurosuchus is not correct if it is not mensural.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the shopfront is not noncellular and it is not a Saurosuchus is not true.; int7 -> hypothesis;
if the sorceress is not a kind of a coupling and is a kind of a strung then it is not basal.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that that it is not noncellular and it is not a Saurosuchus does not hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the antiflatulent does not nag eyeliner and is a U then it is not a Lens. sent2: if the azurite is not a strung that it is not a Lens and it nags eyeliner is wrong. sent3: that the antiflatulent is non-mensural thing that does not nag eyeliner is wrong. sent4: if something does not nag doo-wop the fact that it is not a kind of a disorientation and it is not brunet does not hold. sent5: if the antiflatulent is not a Lens the fact that the azurite is a kind of a strung but it does not nag doo-wop does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it nags doo-wop and is not a kind of a Saurosuchus is incorrect. sent7: either the sorceress is a brunet or it is not a kind of a disorientation or both if the arrowroot is not a kind of a disorientation. sent8: the antiflatulent is a Lens or it does not nag doo-wop or both. sent9: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a disorientation and it is a Saurosuchus is not right. sent10: the sorceress tarnishes azurite. sent11: that the shopfront is a kind of a disorientation that is not mensural does not hold. sent12: the fact that the arrowroot is both not a disorientation and a brunet is not correct. sent13: the antiflatulent does not nag eyeliner and is a U. sent14: if the sorceress is a brunet or not a disorientation or both the fact that the shopfront is not mensural is true. sent15: the fact that something does not nag doo-wop but it is noncellular is wrong if it is not a disorientation. sent16: if something is not a coupling and is a kind of a strung then that it is not basal is right. sent17: if that the azurite does string and does not nag doo-wop is not true then the arrowroot is not a kind of a disorientation. sent18: if the fact that the arrowroot is a disorientation but not a strung does not hold the fact that the azurite is not brunet is not wrong. sent19: if something is not mensural the fact that it is both not noncellular and not a Saurosuchus is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the antiflatulent is not a Lens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the azurite is a strung but it does not nag doo-wop is not true.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the arrowroot is not a disorientation.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the sorceress is a kind of a brunet and/or it is not a disorientation.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the shopfront is not mensural.; sent19 -> int6: that the shopfront is non-noncellular thing that is not a kind of a Saurosuchus is not correct if it is not mensural.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the shopfront is not noncellular and it is not a Saurosuchus is not true.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__