that the peak does not occur results in that both the supportiveness and the occurrence happens.
sent1: the fact that the frontalness happens is not right if the torrent does not occur or the parlaying does not occur or both. sent2: the caesuralness does not occur and the indication does not occur. sent3: if the peaking does not occur and the crabbing does not occur then the occurrence happens. sent4: that the crab does not occur is triggered by that the stoking sadism does not occur or the liturgicalness does not occur or both. sent5: the rack does not occur if the ovularness does not occur or the vacation does not occur or both. sent6: both the unsupportiveness and the occurrence occurs if the security does not occur. sent7: both the stoking M and the sermonizing Marineland happens. sent8: the sermonizing specification does not occur if the fact that both the chaining and the sermonizing specification occurs is not correct. sent9: if the pteridologicalness does not occur then the supportiveness happens and the security happens. sent10: if that the crabbing occurs and/or the liturgicalness does not occur is incorrect the souring does not occur. sent11: the fact that the incurring and the pteridologicalness occurs is not correct if the reminiscing does not occur. sent12: if the liturgicalness does not occur that the crab does not occur is correct. sent13: the security happens. sent14: if the pteridologicalness does not occur the security occurs. sent15: the stoking sadism does not occur and the sour does not occur. sent16: that that the crabbing happens and/or the liturgicalness does not occur is not false does not hold if the peaking happens. sent17: the reminiscing does not occur. sent18: the partying does not occur and the sermonizing myxovirus does not occur. sent19: if that the incurring happens and the pteridologicalness happens does not hold the pteridologicalness does not occur. sent20: both the Tasmanianness and the aggression occurs.
sent15 -> int1: the stoking sadism does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the fact that either the stoking sadism does not occur or the liturgicalness does not occur or both is not wrong.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the crabbing does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peak does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the peaking does not occur and the crabbing does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the occurrence occurs.; sent11 & sent17 -> int6: that the fact that the incurring happens and the pteridologicalness occurs is not incorrect is false.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the pteridologicalness does not occur.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: both the supportiveness and the security happens.; int8 -> int9: the supportiveness occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: both the supportiveness and the occurrence happens.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the stretching Sericocarpus does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = that the peak does not occur results in that both the supportiveness and the occurrence happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the frontalness happens is not right if the torrent does not occur or the parlaying does not occur or both. sent2: the caesuralness does not occur and the indication does not occur. sent3: if the peaking does not occur and the crabbing does not occur then the occurrence happens. sent4: that the crab does not occur is triggered by that the stoking sadism does not occur or the liturgicalness does not occur or both. sent5: the rack does not occur if the ovularness does not occur or the vacation does not occur or both. sent6: both the unsupportiveness and the occurrence occurs if the security does not occur. sent7: both the stoking M and the sermonizing Marineland happens. sent8: the sermonizing specification does not occur if the fact that both the chaining and the sermonizing specification occurs is not correct. sent9: if the pteridologicalness does not occur then the supportiveness happens and the security happens. sent10: if that the crabbing occurs and/or the liturgicalness does not occur is incorrect the souring does not occur. sent11: the fact that the incurring and the pteridologicalness occurs is not correct if the reminiscing does not occur. sent12: if the liturgicalness does not occur that the crab does not occur is correct. sent13: the security happens. sent14: if the pteridologicalness does not occur the security occurs. sent15: the stoking sadism does not occur and the sour does not occur. sent16: that that the crabbing happens and/or the liturgicalness does not occur is not false does not hold if the peaking happens. sent17: the reminiscing does not occur. sent18: the partying does not occur and the sermonizing myxovirus does not occur. sent19: if that the incurring happens and the pteridologicalness happens does not hold the pteridologicalness does not occur. sent20: both the Tasmanianness and the aggression occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the stoking sadism does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the fact that either the stoking sadism does not occur or the liturgicalness does not occur or both is not wrong.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the crabbing does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peak does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the peaking does not occur and the crabbing does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the occurrence occurs.; sent11 & sent17 -> int6: that the fact that the incurring happens and the pteridologicalness occurs is not incorrect is false.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the pteridologicalness does not occur.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: both the supportiveness and the security happens.; int8 -> int9: the supportiveness occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: both the supportiveness and the occurrence happens.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__