the fact that the lockdown does not occur and the blemishing hibiscus happens if the blemishing chartreuse does not occur is not correct.
sent1: that the lockdown occurs is prevented by that the Czech happens and the blemishing chartreuse does not occur. sent2: the councillorship does not occur. sent3: the blemishing downdraft occurs or the preserving mood does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that the abjuring Empetraceae occurs and the allowableness does not occur is wrong if the Czech does not occur. sent5: the Arthurianness does not occur and the suffocating does not occur if the have does not occur. sent6: the allowableness does not occur. sent7: that both the clotting and the chance-medley occurs prevents the having. sent8: the chance-medley and the non-upness occurs if the federalness does not occur. sent9: if the ulnarness does not occur the federalness does not occur and the abjuring Ottoman does not occur. sent10: the abjuring Empetraceae occurs. sent11: the blemishing slopshop does not occur. sent12: the lockdown happens if that the blemishing hibiscus does not occur and the tightness does not occur does not hold. sent13: the fact that the blemishing hibiscus does not occur and the tightness does not occur is not correct if the Arthurianness does not occur. sent14: the dermabrasion but not the mottling happens. sent15: the clotting occurs and the anastomoticness happens. sent16: if the blemishing chartreuse does not occur and the Czechness does not occur the usance happens. sent17: the blemishing hibiscus happens and the tightness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Czechness does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the abjuring Empetraceae but not the allowableness occurs is wrong.; sent10 & sent6 -> int2: the abjuring Empetraceae and the non-allowableness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Czechness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blemishing chartreuse does not occur hold.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: that the Czechness but not the blemishing chartreuse happens is correct.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the lockdown does not occur.; sent17 -> int7: the blemishing hibiscus occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the lockdown does not occur and the blemishing hibiscus happens.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the usance happens.
sent15 -> int9: the clot happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the lockdown does not occur and the blemishing hibiscus happens if the blemishing chartreuse does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lockdown occurs is prevented by that the Czech happens and the blemishing chartreuse does not occur. sent2: the councillorship does not occur. sent3: the blemishing downdraft occurs or the preserving mood does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that the abjuring Empetraceae occurs and the allowableness does not occur is wrong if the Czech does not occur. sent5: the Arthurianness does not occur and the suffocating does not occur if the have does not occur. sent6: the allowableness does not occur. sent7: that both the clotting and the chance-medley occurs prevents the having. sent8: the chance-medley and the non-upness occurs if the federalness does not occur. sent9: if the ulnarness does not occur the federalness does not occur and the abjuring Ottoman does not occur. sent10: the abjuring Empetraceae occurs. sent11: the blemishing slopshop does not occur. sent12: the lockdown happens if that the blemishing hibiscus does not occur and the tightness does not occur does not hold. sent13: the fact that the blemishing hibiscus does not occur and the tightness does not occur is not correct if the Arthurianness does not occur. sent14: the dermabrasion but not the mottling happens. sent15: the clotting occurs and the anastomoticness happens. sent16: if the blemishing chartreuse does not occur and the Czechness does not occur the usance happens. sent17: the blemishing hibiscus happens and the tightness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Czechness does not occur.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the abjuring Empetraceae but not the allowableness occurs is wrong.; sent10 & sent6 -> int2: the abjuring Empetraceae and the non-allowableness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the Czechness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the blemishing chartreuse does not occur hold.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: that the Czechness but not the blemishing chartreuse happens is correct.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the lockdown does not occur.; sent17 -> int7: the blemishing hibiscus occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the lockdown does not occur and the blemishing hibiscus happens.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__