the fact that if that the loosestrife does create hold the dishpan extricates Galveston is not right.
sent1: if the loosestrife does roughen perspirer but it does not extricate Galveston the creel creates. sent2: that something is not a kind of a light and it is not a kind of a keratotomy is not correct if it does not offer. sent3: something does roughen perspirer but it does not extricate Galveston if it does light. sent4: there is nothing such that it does offer and it is a kind of a bluefin. sent5: if that something is non-light thing that is not a keratotomy does not hold it is a non-light. sent6: the loosestrife extricates Galveston if the dishpan does roughen perspirer. sent7: if the fact that the loosestrife creates is true then it roughens perspirer. sent8: if the loosestrife does extricate Galveston the dishpan does create. sent9: the dishpan does roughen perspirer if the loosestrife extricates Galveston. sent10: that the dishpan extricates Galveston is true if the loosestrife roughens perspirer. sent11: the loosestrife extricates Galveston.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the loosestrife creates.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the loosestrife roughens perspirer.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the dishpan extricates Galveston.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the creel creates.
sent3 -> int3: the loosestrife does roughen perspirer but it does not extricate Galveston if it does light.; sent5 -> int4: if the fact that the loosestrife does not light and it is not a keratotomy is incorrect it is not light.; sent2 -> int5: if the loosestrife is not an offer the fact that it is not a kind of a light and it is not a keratotomy is not right.; sent4 -> int6: that that the dishpan is an offer and is a bluefin is not wrong is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is a kind of an offer that is a kind of a bluefin is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the loosestrife does create hold the dishpan extricates Galveston is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the loosestrife does roughen perspirer but it does not extricate Galveston the creel creates. sent2: that something is not a kind of a light and it is not a kind of a keratotomy is not correct if it does not offer. sent3: something does roughen perspirer but it does not extricate Galveston if it does light. sent4: there is nothing such that it does offer and it is a kind of a bluefin. sent5: if that something is non-light thing that is not a keratotomy does not hold it is a non-light. sent6: the loosestrife extricates Galveston if the dishpan does roughen perspirer. sent7: if the fact that the loosestrife creates is true then it roughens perspirer. sent8: if the loosestrife does extricate Galveston the dishpan does create. sent9: the dishpan does roughen perspirer if the loosestrife extricates Galveston. sent10: that the dishpan extricates Galveston is true if the loosestrife roughens perspirer. sent11: the loosestrife extricates Galveston. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the loosestrife creates.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the loosestrife roughens perspirer.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the dishpan extricates Galveston.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__