the lockage is a chew.
sent1: something is not indulgent and it does not enter effluent if it is not a levity. sent2: the socialite enters effluent if the scarf does not enters effluent. sent3: if the socialite does enter effluent but it is not a kind of a muffle the lockage is not a chew. sent4: the tilter is not superhuman. sent5: if the scarf is a levity the lockage is indulgent. sent6: something does not depressurize high-muck-a-muck if it does not invalid. sent7: if the fact that the socialite is a muffle and is not superhuman does not hold then the fact that the scarf is a kind of a levity hold. sent8: something is not a muffle and/or it is not a levity if it is not superhuman. sent9: if the scarf is not a levity it does not enter effluent. sent10: the heavyweight is anopheline. sent11: if that the tilter is a kind of a adrenergic hold it is not indulgent. sent12: if the fact that something is a kind of a levity but it is not indulgent is incorrect it does not enter effluent. sent13: if something is not superhuman it is not a adrenergic. sent14: that the scarf is a levity but it is not indulgent does not hold if the tilter is not indulgent. sent15: the lockage is a chew if the scarf is a chew. sent16: the tilter is a adrenergic and/or does not enter kilometer if that it is non-superhuman is true. sent17: the socialite does enter effluent. sent18: there is something such that that it does not enter tilter and is superhuman is not correct. sent19: if something is a adrenergic it is not indulgent. sent20: something does not enter effluent if it is not a levity. sent21: if something is adrenergic and/or it does not enter kilometer then it is not indulgent. sent22: if the scarf does not enter effluent the socialite does enter effluent but it is not a muffle. sent23: the fact that the fact that the socialite does muffle but it is not superhuman is false is not false if the carafe does not enter tilter.
sent21 -> int1: the tilter is not indulgent if it is a adrenergic or does not enter kilometer or both.; sent16 & sent4 -> int2: the tilter is a adrenergic and/or it does not enter kilometer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tilter is not indulgent.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the scarf is a levity and is not indulgent does not hold.; sent12 -> int5: the scarf does not enter effluent if that it is a levity and is not indulgent is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the scarf does not enter effluent.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: that the socialite does enter effluent and is not a muffle is true.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the lockage is a kind of a chew.
sent10 -> int8: there is something such that it is a kind of a anopheline.;
$hypothesis$ = the lockage is a chew. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not indulgent and it does not enter effluent if it is not a levity. sent2: the socialite enters effluent if the scarf does not enters effluent. sent3: if the socialite does enter effluent but it is not a kind of a muffle the lockage is not a chew. sent4: the tilter is not superhuman. sent5: if the scarf is a levity the lockage is indulgent. sent6: something does not depressurize high-muck-a-muck if it does not invalid. sent7: if the fact that the socialite is a muffle and is not superhuman does not hold then the fact that the scarf is a kind of a levity hold. sent8: something is not a muffle and/or it is not a levity if it is not superhuman. sent9: if the scarf is not a levity it does not enter effluent. sent10: the heavyweight is anopheline. sent11: if that the tilter is a kind of a adrenergic hold it is not indulgent. sent12: if the fact that something is a kind of a levity but it is not indulgent is incorrect it does not enter effluent. sent13: if something is not superhuman it is not a adrenergic. sent14: that the scarf is a levity but it is not indulgent does not hold if the tilter is not indulgent. sent15: the lockage is a chew if the scarf is a chew. sent16: the tilter is a adrenergic and/or does not enter kilometer if that it is non-superhuman is true. sent17: the socialite does enter effluent. sent18: there is something such that that it does not enter tilter and is superhuman is not correct. sent19: if something is a adrenergic it is not indulgent. sent20: something does not enter effluent if it is not a levity. sent21: if something is adrenergic and/or it does not enter kilometer then it is not indulgent. sent22: if the scarf does not enter effluent the socialite does enter effluent but it is not a muffle. sent23: the fact that the fact that the socialite does muffle but it is not superhuman is false is not false if the carafe does not enter tilter. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: the tilter is not indulgent if it is a adrenergic or does not enter kilometer or both.; sent16 & sent4 -> int2: the tilter is a adrenergic and/or it does not enter kilometer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tilter is not indulgent.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the scarf is a levity and is not indulgent does not hold.; sent12 -> int5: the scarf does not enter effluent if that it is a levity and is not indulgent is wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the scarf does not enter effluent.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: that the socialite does enter effluent and is not a muffle is true.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__