the pottery is a fondue but it does not philander permafrost.
sent1: something is a bulrush if that it is a derogation and does not blue whistle-blower does not hold. sent2: something blues whistle-blower or it cathects backache or both if it is not a Senate. sent3: if the coca is phrenological then the Mobile is phrenological. sent4: the pottery does not flock Gouda if the fact that it is not phrenological is not wrong. sent5: if there is something such that it blues whistle-blower then that the fact that the pottery is a kind of a derogation but it does not blues whistle-blower is not true is not incorrect. sent6: if that the airframe is not a cutout is right then the mulligan either is a kind of a cycle or is angiospermous or both. sent7: if something does philander permafrost that it does flock Gouda is correct. sent8: the work-shirt is not insecure. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not phrenological and is not a kind of a bulrush the anorthite is not a Senate. sent10: the anorthite flocks Gouda and/or it is unrhythmical. sent11: if the anorthite flocks Gouda then the pottery does flocks Gouda. sent12: the Mobile is angiospermous if the mulligan is angiospermous. sent13: the fact that the theodolite is not unrhythmical is true if the pottage cathects fecula and it is unrhythmical. sent14: something blues whistle-blower. sent15: the airframe is a kind of a straddle that is not a cutout. sent16: if that something is roentgenographic but it is not implicit is wrong that it is a Procyonidae is not wrong. sent17: if the Mobile is phrenological and angiospermous the theodolite is not phrenological. sent18: if the penlight is not psycholinguistic the coca is both a January and phrenological. sent19: the fact that the pottery is unrhythmical thing that is phrenological is wrong. sent20: if the mulligan does cycle the Mobile is angiospermous. sent21: the penlight is not psycholinguistic. sent22: if a bulrush is a Senate then it is not phrenological. sent23: if the pottery is not a kind of a Senate it is a fondue and it does not philander permafrost. sent24: the pottery flocks Gouda if the fact that the anorthite is unrhythmical hold. sent25: the theodolite philanders permafrost. sent26: if there are non-insecure things the pottage does cathect fecula and it is unrhythmical.
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the pottery is a derogation that does not blue whistle-blower is not correct then it is a kind of a bulrush.; sent14 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that that the pottery is a derogation but it does not blue whistle-blower is not false is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pottery is a bulrush.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pottery is a Senate.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the pottery is a kind of a bulrush and it is a Senate.; sent22 -> int5: the pottery is not phrenological if it is a kind of a bulrush that is a kind of a Senate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pottery is not phrenological.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the pottery does not flock Gouda is right.; sent10 & sent11 & sent24 -> int8: that the pottery flocks Gouda hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the pottery is not a Senate is not wrong.; int10 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
the anorthite does blue whistle-blower or it cathects backache or both.
sent2 -> int11: if the anorthite is not a kind of a Senate it does blue whistle-blower and/or cathects backache.; sent7 -> int12: the theodolite does flock Gouda if it does philander permafrost.; int12 & sent25 -> int13: the theodolite does flock Gouda.;
$hypothesis$ = the pottery is a fondue but it does not philander permafrost. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a bulrush if that it is a derogation and does not blue whistle-blower does not hold. sent2: something blues whistle-blower or it cathects backache or both if it is not a Senate. sent3: if the coca is phrenological then the Mobile is phrenological. sent4: the pottery does not flock Gouda if the fact that it is not phrenological is not wrong. sent5: if there is something such that it blues whistle-blower then that the fact that the pottery is a kind of a derogation but it does not blues whistle-blower is not true is not incorrect. sent6: if that the airframe is not a cutout is right then the mulligan either is a kind of a cycle or is angiospermous or both. sent7: if something does philander permafrost that it does flock Gouda is correct. sent8: the work-shirt is not insecure. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not phrenological and is not a kind of a bulrush the anorthite is not a Senate. sent10: the anorthite flocks Gouda and/or it is unrhythmical. sent11: if the anorthite flocks Gouda then the pottery does flocks Gouda. sent12: the Mobile is angiospermous if the mulligan is angiospermous. sent13: the fact that the theodolite is not unrhythmical is true if the pottage cathects fecula and it is unrhythmical. sent14: something blues whistle-blower. sent15: the airframe is a kind of a straddle that is not a cutout. sent16: if that something is roentgenographic but it is not implicit is wrong that it is a Procyonidae is not wrong. sent17: if the Mobile is phrenological and angiospermous the theodolite is not phrenological. sent18: if the penlight is not psycholinguistic the coca is both a January and phrenological. sent19: the fact that the pottery is unrhythmical thing that is phrenological is wrong. sent20: if the mulligan does cycle the Mobile is angiospermous. sent21: the penlight is not psycholinguistic. sent22: if a bulrush is a Senate then it is not phrenological. sent23: if the pottery is not a kind of a Senate it is a fondue and it does not philander permafrost. sent24: the pottery flocks Gouda if the fact that the anorthite is unrhythmical hold. sent25: the theodolite philanders permafrost. sent26: if there are non-insecure things the pottage does cathect fecula and it is unrhythmical. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the pottery is a derogation that does not blue whistle-blower is not correct then it is a kind of a bulrush.; sent14 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that that the pottery is a derogation but it does not blue whistle-blower is not false is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pottery is a bulrush.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pottery is a Senate.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the pottery is a kind of a bulrush and it is a Senate.; sent22 -> int5: the pottery is not phrenological if it is a kind of a bulrush that is a kind of a Senate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pottery is not phrenological.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the pottery does not flock Gouda is right.; sent10 & sent11 & sent24 -> int8: that the pottery flocks Gouda hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the pottery is not a Senate is not wrong.; int10 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__