the showgirl is branchless.
sent1: the woofer is not branchless if there is something such that it is not a kind of an intern and emulsifies commuter. sent2: if the fact that the mensch is not a salmonid and/or it is a Fahrenheit is not correct then the crossbench is not an intern. sent3: if the fact that something is blastogenetic but it is not Orphic is not right it is Orphic. sent4: The commuter emulsifies snap. sent5: if that the woofer is not branchless is not false then the showgirl is blastogenetic and it is branchless. sent6: the shaker interns if that the crossbench is not an attempted and is an interns is not right. sent7: there is something such that it does emulsify commuter. sent8: the snap emulsifies commuter. sent9: if that something is branchless but it is not an attempted is not correct that it is not branchless is true. sent10: if something is a kind of an attempted the fact that it is either not a salmonid or Fahrenheit or both is incorrect. sent11: if that the woofer emulsifies commuter is not incorrect that the crossbench is not an attempted but an intern does not hold. sent12: something does not emulsify animal. sent13: if that something does not emulsify commuter and it is not branchless is not true then it does emulsify commuter. sent14: if the fact that the showgirl is not dorsal is not wrong that the woofer does not emulsify commuter and it is not branchless is not true. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is dorsal and it is not a shirtdress is false then the showgirl is not dorsal. sent16: the fact that either the park is hemodynamic or it is not an attempted or both is incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that that it is dorsal and is not a kind of a shirtdress is not right. sent18: if the snap emulsifies commuter that the crossbench emulsifies commuter is not wrong. sent19: that the mensch is an attempted is not incorrect if the fact that the park is hemodynamic and/or it is not an attempted is false.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the mensch is not a salmonid or is a kind of a Fahrenheit or both is not true if the fact that it is a kind of an attempted is correct.; sent19 & sent16 -> int2: the mensch is an attempted.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the mensch is not a kind of a salmonid and/or it is Fahrenheit is not correct.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the crossbench does not intern.; sent18 & sent8 -> int5: the crossbench emulsifies commuter.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the crossbench does not intern and does emulsify commuter.; int6 -> int7: something does not intern and emulsifies commuter.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the woofer is not branchless.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the showgirl is a kind of blastogenetic thing that is branchless.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the showgirl is not branchless.
sent9 -> int10: the showgirl is not branchless if the fact that it is branchless and not an attempted does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the showgirl is branchless. ; $context$ = sent1: the woofer is not branchless if there is something such that it is not a kind of an intern and emulsifies commuter. sent2: if the fact that the mensch is not a salmonid and/or it is a Fahrenheit is not correct then the crossbench is not an intern. sent3: if the fact that something is blastogenetic but it is not Orphic is not right it is Orphic. sent4: The commuter emulsifies snap. sent5: if that the woofer is not branchless is not false then the showgirl is blastogenetic and it is branchless. sent6: the shaker interns if that the crossbench is not an attempted and is an interns is not right. sent7: there is something such that it does emulsify commuter. sent8: the snap emulsifies commuter. sent9: if that something is branchless but it is not an attempted is not correct that it is not branchless is true. sent10: if something is a kind of an attempted the fact that it is either not a salmonid or Fahrenheit or both is incorrect. sent11: if that the woofer emulsifies commuter is not incorrect that the crossbench is not an attempted but an intern does not hold. sent12: something does not emulsify animal. sent13: if that something does not emulsify commuter and it is not branchless is not true then it does emulsify commuter. sent14: if the fact that the showgirl is not dorsal is not wrong that the woofer does not emulsify commuter and it is not branchless is not true. sent15: if there exists something such that the fact that it is dorsal and it is not a shirtdress is false then the showgirl is not dorsal. sent16: the fact that either the park is hemodynamic or it is not an attempted or both is incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that that it is dorsal and is not a kind of a shirtdress is not right. sent18: if the snap emulsifies commuter that the crossbench emulsifies commuter is not wrong. sent19: that the mensch is an attempted is not incorrect if the fact that the park is hemodynamic and/or it is not an attempted is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the mensch is not a salmonid or is a kind of a Fahrenheit or both is not true if the fact that it is a kind of an attempted is correct.; sent19 & sent16 -> int2: the mensch is an attempted.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the mensch is not a kind of a salmonid and/or it is Fahrenheit is not correct.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the crossbench does not intern.; sent18 & sent8 -> int5: the crossbench emulsifies commuter.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the crossbench does not intern and does emulsify commuter.; int6 -> int7: something does not intern and emulsifies commuter.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the woofer is not branchless.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the showgirl is a kind of blastogenetic thing that is branchless.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__