the fact that the takeout is polytheistic is false.
sent1: the carbonyl is mesenteric if the pen-and-ink is a beachwear. sent2: the carbonyl is inoperative if that it is not a analysand and it is not inoperative is wrong. sent3: the fact that that the meprobamate is extrusive but it is not a dwarfishness hold is false. sent4: the fact that the carbonyl is not a analysand and is not inoperative does not hold. sent5: the carbonyl is mesenteric if the pen-and-ink is a kind of a lookdown. sent6: the fact that the takeout is not a sparer and is not mesenteric is wrong. sent7: the fact that either the takeout is not a kind of a sparer or it is a beachwear or both does not hold if it is a lookdown. sent8: that the takeout is not inoperative and is extrusive does not hold. sent9: the fact that the takeout is not polytheistic is true if the fact that it is not a kind of a sparer or it is a dwarfishness or both is false. sent10: the fact that something is not inoperative and is a beachwear does not hold if it is not mesenteric. sent11: the takeout is polytheistic if that the pen-and-ink is non-polytheistic thing that is not a lookdown is false. sent12: if the fact that the takeout is extrusive is true then that it is not a sparer and/or it is a dwarfishness is false. sent13: if that the takeout is a beachwear and/or is a kind of a sparer does not hold then it is not polytheistic. sent14: the takeout is extrusive if something that is a sparer is polytheistic. sent15: the takeout either is extrusive or is a beachwear or both. sent16: the takeout does urticate Gynura. sent17: if that that the takeout is not polytheistic and is not a Vermeer is true does not hold it is a kind of a Vermeer. sent18: if there is something such that it is mesenteric thing that is inoperative then the fact that the carbonyl is polytheistic is not false. sent19: the takeout does not jar agnosticism. sent20: the carbonyl is not a kind of a beachwear if there is something such that the fact that it is not inoperative but a beachwear is not correct. sent21: if the fact that the carbonyl is not a lookdown and not inoperative does not hold then it is inoperative. sent22: either the pen-and-ink is a kind of a beachwear or it is a lookdown or both.
sent22 & sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the carbonyl is mesenteric is true.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the carbonyl is inoperative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the carbonyl is mesenteric and is inoperative.; int3 -> int4: there are mesenteric and inoperative things.;
the takeout is polytheistic.
sent10 -> int5: if the meprobamate is not mesenteric that it is a kind of operative a beachwear does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the takeout is polytheistic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the carbonyl is mesenteric if the pen-and-ink is a beachwear. sent2: the carbonyl is inoperative if that it is not a analysand and it is not inoperative is wrong. sent3: the fact that that the meprobamate is extrusive but it is not a dwarfishness hold is false. sent4: the fact that the carbonyl is not a analysand and is not inoperative does not hold. sent5: the carbonyl is mesenteric if the pen-and-ink is a kind of a lookdown. sent6: the fact that the takeout is not a sparer and is not mesenteric is wrong. sent7: the fact that either the takeout is not a kind of a sparer or it is a beachwear or both does not hold if it is a lookdown. sent8: that the takeout is not inoperative and is extrusive does not hold. sent9: the fact that the takeout is not polytheistic is true if the fact that it is not a kind of a sparer or it is a dwarfishness or both is false. sent10: the fact that something is not inoperative and is a beachwear does not hold if it is not mesenteric. sent11: the takeout is polytheistic if that the pen-and-ink is non-polytheistic thing that is not a lookdown is false. sent12: if the fact that the takeout is extrusive is true then that it is not a sparer and/or it is a dwarfishness is false. sent13: if that the takeout is a beachwear and/or is a kind of a sparer does not hold then it is not polytheistic. sent14: the takeout is extrusive if something that is a sparer is polytheistic. sent15: the takeout either is extrusive or is a beachwear or both. sent16: the takeout does urticate Gynura. sent17: if that that the takeout is not polytheistic and is not a Vermeer is true does not hold it is a kind of a Vermeer. sent18: if there is something such that it is mesenteric thing that is inoperative then the fact that the carbonyl is polytheistic is not false. sent19: the takeout does not jar agnosticism. sent20: the carbonyl is not a kind of a beachwear if there is something such that the fact that it is not inoperative but a beachwear is not correct. sent21: if the fact that the carbonyl is not a lookdown and not inoperative does not hold then it is inoperative. sent22: either the pen-and-ink is a kind of a beachwear or it is a lookdown or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the carbonyl is mesenteric is true.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: the carbonyl is inoperative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the carbonyl is mesenteric and is inoperative.; int3 -> int4: there are mesenteric and inoperative things.; __UNKNOWN__