the stuffing genesis occurs.
sent1: the stuffing genesis is triggered by that the seniorness occurs. sent2: the fact that the fleshing washroom occurs and the scholasticness does not occur is not correct if the betrayal happens. sent3: if the fact that the fleshing washroom but not the scholasticness occurs does not hold then the senior happens. sent4: that the condonation but not the fleshing UHF happens is wrong if the fact that the stoking happens is not incorrect. sent5: that the betrayal happens is true. sent6: if the scholasticness occurs the fact that the seniorness happens is right.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the fleshing washroom happens and the scholasticness does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the senior occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the stuffing genesis occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the stuffing genesis is triggered by that the seniorness occurs. sent2: the fact that the fleshing washroom occurs and the scholasticness does not occur is not correct if the betrayal happens. sent3: if the fact that the fleshing washroom but not the scholasticness occurs does not hold then the senior happens. sent4: that the condonation but not the fleshing UHF happens is wrong if the fact that the stoking happens is not incorrect. sent5: that the betrayal happens is true. sent6: if the scholasticness occurs the fact that the seniorness happens is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the fleshing washroom happens and the scholasticness does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the senior occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__