that the backup does not occur or the winnowing liverwurst does not occur or both is wrong.
sent1: the footfall happens. sent2: the yodeling user does not occur and/or the acceding happens. sent3: that the prevention does not occur and the deathblow does not occur prevents that the winnowing pul does not occur. sent4: if that the guarantee happens is right then the prevention does not occur and the deathblow does not occur. sent5: if the Thainess does not occur then the fact that the trichroism occurs and the footfall occurs is false. sent6: if the fact that the trichroism and the footfall occurs is incorrect the trichroism does not occur. sent7: the winnowing pul happens if the prevention but not the deathblow happens. sent8: the outputting does not occur and the Baptisticness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Singhaleseness occurs but the detente does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the guaranteeing happens and the winnowing pul does not occur is incorrect the winnowing continuity does not occur. sent11: the pollination happens. sent12: the whiteness does not occur. sent13: that the footfall but not the winnowing liverwurst happens is brought about by that the guarantee does not occur. sent14: if the guaranteeing happens then the prevention does not occur. sent15: the countercurrent occurs and the white does not occur. sent16: the frisking occurs if the genesis does not occur but the bogging haywire occurs. sent17: if the crying does not occur the Baptisticness occurs. sent18: the Thai does not occur if the fact that the Singhaleseness occurs and the detente does not occur does not hold. sent19: the backup does not occur or the winnowing liverwurst happens or both. sent20: the nullification is brought about by that the unpicking oligopoly does not occur and the implicationalness occurs. sent21: that the countercurrent happens and the white happens causes that the winnowing pul does not occur. sent22: if the countercurrent and the non-whiteness occurs then that the winnowing pul does not occur is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the guarantee happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the prevention does not occur and the deathblow does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the winnowing pul happens.; sent22 & sent15 -> int3: the winnowing pul does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the guaranteeing does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the footfall but not the winnowing liverwurst happens.; int6 -> int7: that the winnowing liverwurst does not occur is correct.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the trichroism does not occur and the winnowing continuity does not occur.
sent18 & sent9 -> int8: the Thainess does not occur.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: that both the trichroism and the footfall occurs is not true.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the trichroism does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the backup does not occur or the winnowing liverwurst does not occur or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the footfall happens. sent2: the yodeling user does not occur and/or the acceding happens. sent3: that the prevention does not occur and the deathblow does not occur prevents that the winnowing pul does not occur. sent4: if that the guarantee happens is right then the prevention does not occur and the deathblow does not occur. sent5: if the Thainess does not occur then the fact that the trichroism occurs and the footfall occurs is false. sent6: if the fact that the trichroism and the footfall occurs is incorrect the trichroism does not occur. sent7: the winnowing pul happens if the prevention but not the deathblow happens. sent8: the outputting does not occur and the Baptisticness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Singhaleseness occurs but the detente does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the guaranteeing happens and the winnowing pul does not occur is incorrect the winnowing continuity does not occur. sent11: the pollination happens. sent12: the whiteness does not occur. sent13: that the footfall but not the winnowing liverwurst happens is brought about by that the guarantee does not occur. sent14: if the guaranteeing happens then the prevention does not occur. sent15: the countercurrent occurs and the white does not occur. sent16: the frisking occurs if the genesis does not occur but the bogging haywire occurs. sent17: if the crying does not occur the Baptisticness occurs. sent18: the Thai does not occur if the fact that the Singhaleseness occurs and the detente does not occur does not hold. sent19: the backup does not occur or the winnowing liverwurst happens or both. sent20: the nullification is brought about by that the unpicking oligopoly does not occur and the implicationalness occurs. sent21: that the countercurrent happens and the white happens causes that the winnowing pul does not occur. sent22: if the countercurrent and the non-whiteness occurs then that the winnowing pul does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the guarantee happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the prevention does not occur and the deathblow does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the winnowing pul happens.; sent22 & sent15 -> int3: the winnowing pul does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the guaranteeing does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the footfall but not the winnowing liverwurst happens.; int6 -> int7: that the winnowing liverwurst does not occur is correct.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__