the budding is not Monophysite but a sub-interval.
sent1: if something is a kind of a Romance then it is not a kind of an incompetent and it does bob. sent2: if the aminophylline is not Monophysite the budding is not Monophysite but a sub-interval. sent3: if the fact that the Uriah is Gauguinesque thing that is not an incompetent does not hold then the aminophylline is not a kind of a Monophysite. sent4: if the propagandist is a Romance the minicar is not an incompetent. sent5: if the thumbnail is sartorial the propagandist is a kind of a Romance. sent6: if the minicar is not an incompetent then the fact that the Uriah is Gauguinesque and it is an incompetent is not true. sent7: if the minicar is not an incompetent the fact that the Uriah is both Gauguinesque and not an incompetent is not true. sent8: the dickey is not a swindler and does retake. sent9: if something is not non-Monophysite then the fact that it is Gauguinesque and is non-sartorial is incorrect. sent10: if the aminophylline is not a kind of a Monophysite then the budding is not Monophysite. sent11: that the dendrite is a Romance if the fact that the dickey is both Gauguinesque and not sartorial is incorrect is not false. sent12: if the dickey is not a swindler and is a retake the thumbnail is sartorial.
sent12 & sent8 -> int1: the thumbnail is sartorial.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the propagandist is not a kind of a Romance hold is wrong.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the minicar is not a kind of an incompetent.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Uriah is Gauguinesque but it is not a kind of an incompetent does not hold.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the aminophylline is not a kind of a Monophysite.; sent2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the dendrite is not an incompetent but it does bob.
sent1 -> int6: the dendrite is not a kind of an incompetent but it is a bob if it is a kind of a Romance.; sent9 -> int7: if the dickey is a Monophysite then that it is Gauguinesque and is not sartorial is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the budding is not Monophysite but a sub-interval. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a Romance then it is not a kind of an incompetent and it does bob. sent2: if the aminophylline is not Monophysite the budding is not Monophysite but a sub-interval. sent3: if the fact that the Uriah is Gauguinesque thing that is not an incompetent does not hold then the aminophylline is not a kind of a Monophysite. sent4: if the propagandist is a Romance the minicar is not an incompetent. sent5: if the thumbnail is sartorial the propagandist is a kind of a Romance. sent6: if the minicar is not an incompetent then the fact that the Uriah is Gauguinesque and it is an incompetent is not true. sent7: if the minicar is not an incompetent the fact that the Uriah is both Gauguinesque and not an incompetent is not true. sent8: the dickey is not a swindler and does retake. sent9: if something is not non-Monophysite then the fact that it is Gauguinesque and is non-sartorial is incorrect. sent10: if the aminophylline is not a kind of a Monophysite then the budding is not Monophysite. sent11: that the dendrite is a Romance if the fact that the dickey is both Gauguinesque and not sartorial is incorrect is not false. sent12: if the dickey is not a swindler and is a retake the thumbnail is sartorial. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent8 -> int1: the thumbnail is sartorial.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the propagandist is not a kind of a Romance hold is wrong.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the minicar is not a kind of an incompetent.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Uriah is Gauguinesque but it is not a kind of an incompetent does not hold.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the aminophylline is not a kind of a Monophysite.; sent2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__