the magnifying happens.
sent1: the bustling and/or that the lobbing lather occurs prevents that the magnifying occurs. sent2: both the non-gastroduodenalness and the non-ipsilateralness occurs if the raiding does not occur. sent3: that the bustling occurs prevents the incoherentness. sent4: the unadaptableness occurs if the tiding but not the insaneness occurs. sent5: if the barrage does not occur then both the insaneness and the tide occurs. sent6: the lobbing lather does not occur if the fact that both the lobbing lather and the non-gastroduodenalness happens does not hold. sent7: if the ipsilateralness occurs then that the lobbing lather happens but the gastroduodenalness does not occur is false. sent8: the lobbing lather happens. sent9: that not the bustling but the magnifying occurs is triggered by that the lobbing lather does not occur. sent10: the adaptableness brings about that the ipsilateralness and the raid occurs. sent11: if that not the lobbing Tanakh but the raiding happens is incorrect then the raiding does not occur. sent12: the magnifying does not occur if the bustle happens. sent13: that the fact that the lobbing Tanakh does not occur but the raiding occurs is true is false if the unadaptableness happens. sent14: the unadaptableness does not occur and the lobbing Tanakh does not occur if the insaneness occurs.
sent8 -> int1: the bustling happens or the lobbing lather occurs or both.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the coherentness occurs and/or the bogging irritability occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the magnifying happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the bustling and/or that the lobbing lather occurs prevents that the magnifying occurs. sent2: both the non-gastroduodenalness and the non-ipsilateralness occurs if the raiding does not occur. sent3: that the bustling occurs prevents the incoherentness. sent4: the unadaptableness occurs if the tiding but not the insaneness occurs. sent5: if the barrage does not occur then both the insaneness and the tide occurs. sent6: the lobbing lather does not occur if the fact that both the lobbing lather and the non-gastroduodenalness happens does not hold. sent7: if the ipsilateralness occurs then that the lobbing lather happens but the gastroduodenalness does not occur is false. sent8: the lobbing lather happens. sent9: that not the bustling but the magnifying occurs is triggered by that the lobbing lather does not occur. sent10: the adaptableness brings about that the ipsilateralness and the raid occurs. sent11: if that not the lobbing Tanakh but the raiding happens is incorrect then the raiding does not occur. sent12: the magnifying does not occur if the bustle happens. sent13: that the fact that the lobbing Tanakh does not occur but the raiding occurs is true is false if the unadaptableness happens. sent14: the unadaptableness does not occur and the lobbing Tanakh does not occur if the insaneness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the bustling happens or the lobbing lather occurs or both.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__