that both the cerebrospinalness and the algalness occurs is not correct.
sent1: the split occurs. sent2: the non-cerebrospinalness is prevented by the split. sent3: the fact that the confinement occurs is right. sent4: the confinement occurs and the algalness occurs. sent5: the confinement happens and the judgment happens if the algalness does not occur. sent6: the consumptive occurs and the disintegration occurs.
sent4 -> int1: the algalness happens.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the cerebrospinalness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the judgment occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that both the cerebrospinalness and the algalness occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the split occurs. sent2: the non-cerebrospinalness is prevented by the split. sent3: the fact that the confinement occurs is right. sent4: the confinement occurs and the algalness occurs. sent5: the confinement happens and the judgment happens if the algalness does not occur. sent6: the consumptive occurs and the disintegration occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the algalness happens.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the cerebrospinalness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__