the countertransference is not a linguist.
sent1: the pommel is both a linguist and not an italic. sent2: the tandoor is a flypaper if that the conductor is not later or is not a kind of a Raphidae or both is incorrect. sent3: the countertransference is not a linguist and it is not a decency if it is a kind of a Halenia. sent4: if something that does rabbet wineglass does not exclude then it is not a palette. sent5: that the conductor does exclude if the fact that the tandoor either is not a kind of a flypaper or is not a Raphidae or both is not true is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the tandoor is not a flypaper and/or it is not a Halenia does not hold. sent7: if the conductor is later the countertransference is a linguist. sent8: if something excludes it is later. sent9: the pusher is a Halenia if either the tandoor is not a flypaper or it is not a Raphidae or both. sent10: something is a kind of a decency if the fact that it is a kind of a Halenia is right. sent11: if that something is a antipode but it does not exclude is not true it is a Halenia. sent12: either the pusher is not later or it is not a Halenia or both. sent13: the pommel is later but it is not a kind of an italic. sent14: the pommel is not an italic. sent15: the pommel is a kind of a Filipino but it is not italic. sent16: the conductor is ununderstood but it is not a myxoma. sent17: if the pusher is a decency the pommel is a antipode. sent18: the tandoor is a flypaper or is not a linguist or both. sent19: the tandoor is not a antipode and is later if it is an italic. sent20: the pommel is not a antipode if it is Filipino and an italic. sent21: if something that is not non-Filipino is not an italic it is not a kind of a antipode.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tandoor is not a flypaper and/or it is not a Raphidae.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the pusher is a kind of a Halenia.; sent10 -> int2: if the pusher is a Halenia then it is a decency.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pusher is a decency.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the pommel is a kind of a antipode.; sent21 -> int5: if the pommel is a Filipino but it is not italic it is not a antipode.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: that the pommel is not a antipode is right.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the tandoor is not a flypaper or not a Raphidae or both is false.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the conductor excludes.; sent8 -> int10: if the fact that the conductor does not exclude does not hold then it is later.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the conductor is later is right.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the pommel is not a palette if it does rabbet wineglass and does not exclude.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the countertransference is not a linguist. ; $context$ = sent1: the pommel is both a linguist and not an italic. sent2: the tandoor is a flypaper if that the conductor is not later or is not a kind of a Raphidae or both is incorrect. sent3: the countertransference is not a linguist and it is not a decency if it is a kind of a Halenia. sent4: if something that does rabbet wineglass does not exclude then it is not a palette. sent5: that the conductor does exclude if the fact that the tandoor either is not a kind of a flypaper or is not a Raphidae or both is not true is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the tandoor is not a flypaper and/or it is not a Halenia does not hold. sent7: if the conductor is later the countertransference is a linguist. sent8: if something excludes it is later. sent9: the pusher is a Halenia if either the tandoor is not a flypaper or it is not a Raphidae or both. sent10: something is a kind of a decency if the fact that it is a kind of a Halenia is right. sent11: if that something is a antipode but it does not exclude is not true it is a Halenia. sent12: either the pusher is not later or it is not a Halenia or both. sent13: the pommel is later but it is not a kind of an italic. sent14: the pommel is not an italic. sent15: the pommel is a kind of a Filipino but it is not italic. sent16: the conductor is ununderstood but it is not a myxoma. sent17: if the pusher is a decency the pommel is a antipode. sent18: the tandoor is a flypaper or is not a linguist or both. sent19: the tandoor is not a antipode and is later if it is an italic. sent20: the pommel is not a antipode if it is Filipino and an italic. sent21: if something that is not non-Filipino is not an italic it is not a kind of a antipode. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tandoor is not a flypaper and/or it is not a Raphidae.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the pusher is a kind of a Halenia.; sent10 -> int2: if the pusher is a Halenia then it is a decency.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pusher is a decency.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the pommel is a kind of a antipode.; sent21 -> int5: if the pommel is a Filipino but it is not italic it is not a antipode.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: that the pommel is not a antipode is right.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the tandoor is not a flypaper or not a Raphidae or both is false.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the conductor excludes.; sent8 -> int10: if the fact that the conductor does not exclude does not hold then it is later.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the conductor is later is right.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__