the Neopolitan is not a freeze.
sent1: if the stew is revivalistic that the Neopolitan is not a freeze and not a trephination is wrong. sent2: the bilberry does not demagnetize skybox. sent3: the bilberry is a microbe and it is a bounce if it does not suckle infernal. sent4: the Neopolitan is a discussant. sent5: that that something does not broadcast but it is revivalistic is not false does not hold if it is not a bounce. sent6: the shoji does not suckle infernal. sent7: the square-rigger is not revivalistic. sent8: if that the Neopolitan is a kind of a discussant and is a kind of a freeze hold then the stew is not a trephination. sent9: that if the fact that the bilberry is not a trephination and is not a broadcast does not hold the shoji is revivalistic hold. sent10: if the shoji is a bounce then that it is not a microbe and is revivalistic does not hold. sent11: The infernal does not suckle shoji. sent12: the Neopolitan is a Tampico and it is a bounce. sent13: the stew is not non-revivalistic if the fact that the bilberry is a kind of non-revivalistic thing that does not broadcast is not false. sent14: if the fact that that something is not a broadcast but revivalistic is not incorrect is not true then it is a trephination. sent15: the fact that the bilberry is not a trephination and it is not a broadcast is not right if the stew is not a trephination. sent16: the shoji is a trephination if that the stew is not a bounce and it is not a kind of a microbe does not hold. sent17: the fact that the bilberry does not suckle infernal is correct if that it is not metric is not false. sent18: the shoji does not freeze. sent19: if the shoji does not suckle infernal it is a bounce.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Neopolitan is a kind of a freeze is not incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Neopolitan is a discussant and it is a kind of a freeze.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the stew is not a trephination.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the bilberry is not a trephination and it is not a broadcast does not hold is correct.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the shoji is revivalistic.; sent19 & sent6 -> int5: the shoji bounces.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: that the shoji is not a microbe but it is revivalistic is false.;
the Neopolitan freezes.
sent14 -> int7: if that the stew does not broadcast but it is revivalistic does not hold then it is a kind of a trephination.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that the stew is not a broadcast and is revivalistic is false if it is not a kind of a bounce.;
$hypothesis$ = the Neopolitan is not a freeze. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stew is revivalistic that the Neopolitan is not a freeze and not a trephination is wrong. sent2: the bilberry does not demagnetize skybox. sent3: the bilberry is a microbe and it is a bounce if it does not suckle infernal. sent4: the Neopolitan is a discussant. sent5: that that something does not broadcast but it is revivalistic is not false does not hold if it is not a bounce. sent6: the shoji does not suckle infernal. sent7: the square-rigger is not revivalistic. sent8: if that the Neopolitan is a kind of a discussant and is a kind of a freeze hold then the stew is not a trephination. sent9: that if the fact that the bilberry is not a trephination and is not a broadcast does not hold the shoji is revivalistic hold. sent10: if the shoji is a bounce then that it is not a microbe and is revivalistic does not hold. sent11: The infernal does not suckle shoji. sent12: the Neopolitan is a Tampico and it is a bounce. sent13: the stew is not non-revivalistic if the fact that the bilberry is a kind of non-revivalistic thing that does not broadcast is not false. sent14: if the fact that that something is not a broadcast but revivalistic is not incorrect is not true then it is a trephination. sent15: the fact that the bilberry is not a trephination and it is not a broadcast is not right if the stew is not a trephination. sent16: the shoji is a trephination if that the stew is not a bounce and it is not a kind of a microbe does not hold. sent17: the fact that the bilberry does not suckle infernal is correct if that it is not metric is not false. sent18: the shoji does not freeze. sent19: if the shoji does not suckle infernal it is a bounce. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Neopolitan is a kind of a freeze is not incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Neopolitan is a discussant and it is a kind of a freeze.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the stew is not a trephination.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the bilberry is not a trephination and it is not a broadcast does not hold is correct.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the shoji is revivalistic.; sent19 & sent6 -> int5: the shoji bounces.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: that the shoji is not a microbe but it is revivalistic is false.; __UNKNOWN__