the allophonicness does not occur and the pressure does not occur.
sent1: that not the swimming utilitarian but the trabecularness occurs is caused by that the allophonicness occurs. sent2: if the Jainness happens then not the muff but the suppling latecomer occurs. sent3: the raving occurs. sent4: the trolling does not occur and the pairing Pyramid happens. sent5: the deprecation happens if the swimming antihero happens. sent6: the pairing complaint does not occur but the swimming Buber occurs if the unswornness occurs. sent7: that not the suppling peccary but the interoceptiveness happens does not hold. sent8: the Jainness occurs. sent9: that the theosophicalness does not occur hold. sent10: the trabecularness happens if the allophonicness happens. sent11: the hatefulness or the fundamentals or both occurs if the cellularness does not occur. sent12: the premedicalness occurs. sent13: the suppling Balanus does not occur. sent14: the pressure does not occur if the fact that the pressure and the translationalness happens does not hold. sent15: the malpractice does not occur. sent16: that that both the pressure and the translationalness occurs does not hold is true. sent17: the trabecularness happens. sent18: the fact that not the swimming utilitarian but the trabecularness happens is incorrect if the malpractice does not occur. sent19: that that the allophonicness does not occur and the pressure does not occur is right does not hold if the malpractice occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allophonicness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the swimming utilitarian does not occur and the trabecularness happens.; sent18 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the swimming utilitarian does not occur but the trabecularness happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the allophonicness does not occur.; sent14 & sent16 -> int5: the pressure does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the allophonicness does not occur and the pressure does not occur is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the allophonicness does not occur and the pressure does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the swimming utilitarian but the trabecularness occurs is caused by that the allophonicness occurs. sent2: if the Jainness happens then not the muff but the suppling latecomer occurs. sent3: the raving occurs. sent4: the trolling does not occur and the pairing Pyramid happens. sent5: the deprecation happens if the swimming antihero happens. sent6: the pairing complaint does not occur but the swimming Buber occurs if the unswornness occurs. sent7: that not the suppling peccary but the interoceptiveness happens does not hold. sent8: the Jainness occurs. sent9: that the theosophicalness does not occur hold. sent10: the trabecularness happens if the allophonicness happens. sent11: the hatefulness or the fundamentals or both occurs if the cellularness does not occur. sent12: the premedicalness occurs. sent13: the suppling Balanus does not occur. sent14: the pressure does not occur if the fact that the pressure and the translationalness happens does not hold. sent15: the malpractice does not occur. sent16: that that both the pressure and the translationalness occurs does not hold is true. sent17: the trabecularness happens. sent18: the fact that not the swimming utilitarian but the trabecularness happens is incorrect if the malpractice does not occur. sent19: that that the allophonicness does not occur and the pressure does not occur is right does not hold if the malpractice occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allophonicness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the swimming utilitarian does not occur and the trabecularness happens.; sent18 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the swimming utilitarian does not occur but the trabecularness happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the allophonicness does not occur.; sent14 & sent16 -> int5: the pressure does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__