there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a teapot then it is not a perishable and it appreciates.
sent1: the fact that the Orangeman is not a clogging but a hematocele is correct if it is not a kind of a clapboard. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not biblical then it is not dialectal and it is not non-bibliophilic. sent3: if the Orangeman is not a kind of a teapot then it is not a perishable. sent4: something that is not a perpetrator is both not a barrack and a canvasback. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a teapot it is not a perishable. sent6: something is both not a Murillo and a canvasback if it does not despair razbliuto. sent7: there is something such that if it does not slenderize then it is not philosophic and is an agglomerate. sent8: if something does not clapboard it is not a pig and it is disposable. sent9: something is imperishable if it is not a teapot. sent10: if the amaretto is not a kind of a website it does not worsen and it does unspell amaretto. sent11: the Orangeman is not a FDA but a metallurgist if it is not biauricular. sent12: if something is a teapot it is not a perishable and it appreciates. sent13: if the Orangeman does not top then it is not dialectal and is a kind of a perishable. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a teapot it is a kind of non-perishable thing that appreciates. sent15: if the Orangeman is a kind of a teapot then it is a kind of imperishable thing that appreciates.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a teapot then it is not a perishable and it appreciates. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Orangeman is not a clogging but a hematocele is correct if it is not a kind of a clapboard. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not biblical then it is not dialectal and it is not non-bibliophilic. sent3: if the Orangeman is not a kind of a teapot then it is not a perishable. sent4: something that is not a perpetrator is both not a barrack and a canvasback. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a teapot it is not a perishable. sent6: something is both not a Murillo and a canvasback if it does not despair razbliuto. sent7: there is something such that if it does not slenderize then it is not philosophic and is an agglomerate. sent8: if something does not clapboard it is not a pig and it is disposable. sent9: something is imperishable if it is not a teapot. sent10: if the amaretto is not a kind of a website it does not worsen and it does unspell amaretto. sent11: the Orangeman is not a FDA but a metallurgist if it is not biauricular. sent12: if something is a teapot it is not a perishable and it appreciates. sent13: if the Orangeman does not top then it is not dialectal and is a kind of a perishable. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a teapot it is a kind of non-perishable thing that appreciates. sent15: if the Orangeman is a kind of a teapot then it is a kind of imperishable thing that appreciates. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__