that there is something such that the fact that it is not uncooperative and it is an orifice is incorrect is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that something does not chirk but it deflowers remark is not true then it is ambiversive. sent2: if the perspirer does chirk the dinnerware is ungual. sent3: there exists something such that that it is not cooperative but an orifice is not right. sent4: the pulque is a Wollaston if the dinnerware is ungual. sent5: something is a kind of non-uncooperative an orifice. sent6: the perspirer deflowers remark. sent7: if the dinnerware is an orifice then that the fact that it does not chirk and is ungual is true is incorrect. sent8: that something is not uncooperative but it is an orifice is not correct if it is a Wollaston. sent9: the perspirer does chirk and it deflowers remark. sent10: that something is uncooperative thing that is an orifice is not true if it is a Wollaston. sent11: the fact that the pulque is a kind of uncooperative an orifice is not true. sent12: that the pulque is uncooperative and is an orifice is incorrect if it is a Wollaston.
sent9 -> int1: the perspirer chirks.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the dinnerware is ungual.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the pulque is a kind of a Wollaston.; sent8 -> int4: if the pulque is a Wollaston the fact that it is a kind of non-uncooperative thing that is a kind of an orifice is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the pulque is not uncooperative but it is a kind of an orifice is false.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the resinoid is ambiversive.
sent1 -> int6: if the fact that the resinoid does not chirk but it does deflower remark does not hold then it is ambiversive.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that the fact that it is not uncooperative and it is an orifice is incorrect is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not chirk but it deflowers remark is not true then it is ambiversive. sent2: if the perspirer does chirk the dinnerware is ungual. sent3: there exists something such that that it is not cooperative but an orifice is not right. sent4: the pulque is a Wollaston if the dinnerware is ungual. sent5: something is a kind of non-uncooperative an orifice. sent6: the perspirer deflowers remark. sent7: if the dinnerware is an orifice then that the fact that it does not chirk and is ungual is true is incorrect. sent8: that something is not uncooperative but it is an orifice is not correct if it is a Wollaston. sent9: the perspirer does chirk and it deflowers remark. sent10: that something is uncooperative thing that is an orifice is not true if it is a Wollaston. sent11: the fact that the pulque is a kind of uncooperative an orifice is not true. sent12: that the pulque is uncooperative and is an orifice is incorrect if it is a Wollaston. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the perspirer chirks.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the dinnerware is ungual.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the pulque is a kind of a Wollaston.; sent8 -> int4: if the pulque is a Wollaston the fact that it is a kind of non-uncooperative thing that is a kind of an orifice is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the pulque is not uncooperative but it is a kind of an orifice is false.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__