the unpicking bustling occurs.
sent1: if the fact that the expiatoriness does not occur and the tessellating does not occur is not false the transferring occurs. sent2: that both the categoricalness and the clambering happens yields that the agreement does not occur. sent3: if the excitation happens but the fomentation does not occur then the objectification does not occur. sent4: if the crush happens then the microelectronicsness happens. sent5: that the clambering does not occur causes that the categoricalness happens and the unpicking bustling occurs. sent6: the skirling does not occur. sent7: the clambering does not occur and/or the agreement does not occur if the expiatoriness happens. sent8: if the fact that the juncture and the goal-kick occurs is not true the systole does not occur. sent9: the moneran does not occur and the unpicking awlwort does not occur. sent10: the objectification happens if the transferring happens. sent11: the categoricalness happens. sent12: that the insert occurs is not wrong if the fundamental does not occur. sent13: that both the moneran and the unpicking awlwort happens is not true if the proclaiming does not occur. sent14: the non-moneranness causes that both the juncture and the goal-kick occurs. sent15: the clamber happens. sent16: the altricialness occurs if the objectification occurs. sent17: the proclaiming does not occur if the Brazilian does not occur. sent18: the contrast happens. sent19: if the skirl does not occur the Brazilian does not occur. sent20: the nipping happens if the systole occurs. sent21: the excitation occurs. sent22: that the systole does not occur is prevented by the juncture. sent23: if the sponsorship does not occur then the fact that the juncture happens and the goal-kick happens is wrong. sent24: if the agreement does not occur then the expiatoriness does not occur and the tessellating does not occur. sent25: that the unpicking bustling does not occur is triggered by that the nip occurs and the altricialness occurs.
sent11 & sent15 -> int1: the categoricalness occurs and the clamber happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the agreement does not occur is correct.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the expiatoriness does not occur and the tessellating does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the transfer occurs.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the objectification happens.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the altricialness occurs.; sent9 -> int7: the moneran does not occur.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: both the juncture and the goal-kick occurs.; int8 -> int9: the juncture occurs.; sent22 & int9 -> int10: the systole happens.; sent20 & int10 -> int11: the nip happens.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the nip occurs and the altricialness happens.; int12 & sent25 -> hypothesis;
the unpicking bustling happens.
sent19 & sent6 -> int13: the Brazilianness does not occur.; sent17 & int13 -> int14: the proclaiming does not occur.; sent13 & int14 -> int15: that the moneran and the unpicking awlwort occurs is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the unpicking bustling occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the expiatoriness does not occur and the tessellating does not occur is not false the transferring occurs. sent2: that both the categoricalness and the clambering happens yields that the agreement does not occur. sent3: if the excitation happens but the fomentation does not occur then the objectification does not occur. sent4: if the crush happens then the microelectronicsness happens. sent5: that the clambering does not occur causes that the categoricalness happens and the unpicking bustling occurs. sent6: the skirling does not occur. sent7: the clambering does not occur and/or the agreement does not occur if the expiatoriness happens. sent8: if the fact that the juncture and the goal-kick occurs is not true the systole does not occur. sent9: the moneran does not occur and the unpicking awlwort does not occur. sent10: the objectification happens if the transferring happens. sent11: the categoricalness happens. sent12: that the insert occurs is not wrong if the fundamental does not occur. sent13: that both the moneran and the unpicking awlwort happens is not true if the proclaiming does not occur. sent14: the non-moneranness causes that both the juncture and the goal-kick occurs. sent15: the clamber happens. sent16: the altricialness occurs if the objectification occurs. sent17: the proclaiming does not occur if the Brazilian does not occur. sent18: the contrast happens. sent19: if the skirl does not occur the Brazilian does not occur. sent20: the nipping happens if the systole occurs. sent21: the excitation occurs. sent22: that the systole does not occur is prevented by the juncture. sent23: if the sponsorship does not occur then the fact that the juncture happens and the goal-kick happens is wrong. sent24: if the agreement does not occur then the expiatoriness does not occur and the tessellating does not occur. sent25: that the unpicking bustling does not occur is triggered by that the nip occurs and the altricialness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent15 -> int1: the categoricalness occurs and the clamber happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the agreement does not occur is correct.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the expiatoriness does not occur and the tessellating does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the transfer occurs.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the objectification happens.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the altricialness occurs.; sent9 -> int7: the moneran does not occur.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: both the juncture and the goal-kick occurs.; int8 -> int9: the juncture occurs.; sent22 & int9 -> int10: the systole happens.; sent20 & int10 -> int11: the nip happens.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the nip occurs and the altricialness happens.; int12 & sent25 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__