the suburbanite is not an affirmative.
sent1: the enterovirus is not impersonal if there exists something such that the fact that it is not enteric and it is not evening is false. sent2: the suburbanite is an affirmative if that the oxalate does not relace velvetleaf hold. sent3: something is not an affirmative if it is not impersonal. sent4: the speed is not impersonal and it is not affirmative if the suburbanite is not impersonal. sent5: that if the enterovirus is impersonal the nativist is impersonal hold. sent6: there exists something such that that it is both not enteric and not evening is not correct. sent7: the oxalate is a kind of a radish and is not affirmative. sent8: the oxalate does not relace velvetleaf if the speed is not impersonal and it does not collogue. sent9: if something is impersonal it is a burrow. sent10: the speed is an affirmative if the suburbanite is not impersonal. sent11: the enterovirus is impersonal and/or it collogues if there is something such that it does collogues. sent12: if the enterovirus is not impersonal the speed is not impersonal and it does not collogue.
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the enterovirus is not impersonal.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the speed is not impersonal and it does not collogue.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the oxalate does not relace velvetleaf.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the nativist does burrow.
sent9 -> int4: the nativist burrows if it is impersonal.; sent7 -> int5: the oxalate is not an affirmative.; int5 -> int6: there are non-affirmative things.;
$hypothesis$ = the suburbanite is not an affirmative. ; $context$ = sent1: the enterovirus is not impersonal if there exists something such that the fact that it is not enteric and it is not evening is false. sent2: the suburbanite is an affirmative if that the oxalate does not relace velvetleaf hold. sent3: something is not an affirmative if it is not impersonal. sent4: the speed is not impersonal and it is not affirmative if the suburbanite is not impersonal. sent5: that if the enterovirus is impersonal the nativist is impersonal hold. sent6: there exists something such that that it is both not enteric and not evening is not correct. sent7: the oxalate is a kind of a radish and is not affirmative. sent8: the oxalate does not relace velvetleaf if the speed is not impersonal and it does not collogue. sent9: if something is impersonal it is a burrow. sent10: the speed is an affirmative if the suburbanite is not impersonal. sent11: the enterovirus is impersonal and/or it collogues if there is something such that it does collogues. sent12: if the enterovirus is not impersonal the speed is not impersonal and it does not collogue. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the enterovirus is not impersonal.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the speed is not impersonal and it does not collogue.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the oxalate does not relace velvetleaf.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__