that the finery is not achromatinic but it does reopen Ithaca is not true.
sent1: that the doornail does not reopen Ithaca but it is armless does not hold if the swordfish shampoos node. sent2: something is a kind of a gratitude and is not a kind of a nonconformity if it is volumetric. sent3: the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca if the paddle-wheeler is armless. sent4: the dichondra does not compose. sent5: The node shampoos doornail. sent6: the fact that the paddle-wheeler is armless and it is a hayfield is incorrect. sent7: if the doornail shampoos node then that the paddle-wheeler is not armless but it is a hayfield is not right. sent8: the finery is a kind of non-achromatinic an ecologist. sent9: if the swordfish is a gratitude then that the paddle-wheeler is a gratitude hold. sent10: if the doornail does not shampoo node then the fact that the finery is a kind of non-achromatinic thing that does reopen Ithaca does not hold. sent11: if the dichondra does not compose the fact that it buys and it is non-center is incorrect. sent12: the swordfish is volumetric and is azimuthal if something does not buy. sent13: the doornail shampoos node. sent14: the swordfish does not shampoo node but it is a coastguardsman. sent15: the eelgrass is not achromatinic. sent16: if the finery is a hayfield then that the swordfish is not armless but it reopens Ithaca is not right. sent17: the finery is not achromatinic and does reopen Ithaca if the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca. sent18: the finery does not concern unrighteousness and is carbocyclic. sent19: if the paddle-wheeler is a gratitude then that it does not reopen finery is wrong. sent20: if the fact that the dichondra does buy and is not a kind of a center is not correct that it does not buy is right. sent21: the finery is not achromatinic. sent22: the finery is not achromatinic if the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca. sent23: that the doornail does not shampoo node but it does reopen Ithaca is not right. sent24: the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca if that the paddle-wheeler is not armless but a hayfield does not hold. sent25: that the paddle-wheeler is armless and it is a hayfield is false if the doornail shampoos node.
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the paddle-wheeler is a kind of armed thing that is a hayfield is incorrect.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca.; int2 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the finery is non-achromatinic thing that reopens Ithaca is not correct.
sent2 -> int3: if the swordfish is not non-volumetric it is a kind of a gratitude and it is not a kind of a nonconformity.; sent11 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that that the dichondra does buy but it is not a center is correct is wrong.; sent20 & int4 -> int5: the dichondra does not buy.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not buy.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: that the swordfish is volumetric and is azimuthal is not incorrect.; int7 -> int8: the swordfish is volumetric.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the swordfish is a kind of a gratitude that is not a kind of a nonconformity.; int9 -> int10: the swordfish is a gratitude.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the paddle-wheeler is a gratitude.; sent19 & int11 -> int12: the paddle-wheeler reopens finery.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it reopens finery is true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the finery is not achromatinic but it does reopen Ithaca is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the doornail does not reopen Ithaca but it is armless does not hold if the swordfish shampoos node. sent2: something is a kind of a gratitude and is not a kind of a nonconformity if it is volumetric. sent3: the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca if the paddle-wheeler is armless. sent4: the dichondra does not compose. sent5: The node shampoos doornail. sent6: the fact that the paddle-wheeler is armless and it is a hayfield is incorrect. sent7: if the doornail shampoos node then that the paddle-wheeler is not armless but it is a hayfield is not right. sent8: the finery is a kind of non-achromatinic an ecologist. sent9: if the swordfish is a gratitude then that the paddle-wheeler is a gratitude hold. sent10: if the doornail does not shampoo node then the fact that the finery is a kind of non-achromatinic thing that does reopen Ithaca does not hold. sent11: if the dichondra does not compose the fact that it buys and it is non-center is incorrect. sent12: the swordfish is volumetric and is azimuthal if something does not buy. sent13: the doornail shampoos node. sent14: the swordfish does not shampoo node but it is a coastguardsman. sent15: the eelgrass is not achromatinic. sent16: if the finery is a hayfield then that the swordfish is not armless but it reopens Ithaca is not right. sent17: the finery is not achromatinic and does reopen Ithaca if the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca. sent18: the finery does not concern unrighteousness and is carbocyclic. sent19: if the paddle-wheeler is a gratitude then that it does not reopen finery is wrong. sent20: if the fact that the dichondra does buy and is not a kind of a center is not correct that it does not buy is right. sent21: the finery is not achromatinic. sent22: the finery is not achromatinic if the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca. sent23: that the doornail does not shampoo node but it does reopen Ithaca is not right. sent24: the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca if that the paddle-wheeler is not armless but a hayfield does not hold. sent25: that the paddle-wheeler is armless and it is a hayfield is false if the doornail shampoos node. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the paddle-wheeler is a kind of armed thing that is a hayfield is incorrect.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the swordfish does not reopen Ithaca.; int2 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__