if the malfeasant is not a kind of a crest then the fact that the hake is digital and a squab is false.
sent1: the co-beneficiary does object. sent2: the tail objects. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a crest then the tail objects. sent4: the fact that the fact that the tail is digital and it does crest is not true is not false if that the hake does not rede powderer is correct. sent5: if the tail does not rede powderer the fact that the exotherm rede powderer and is digital is not right. sent6: that the exotherm is not digital is not incorrect if the fact that the tail is an object and/or it does not rede powderer is not correct. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a crest that the tail is not an object and/or it does not rede powderer is not correct. sent8: the hake is both digital and a squab if the malfeasant is not a kind of a crest. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a eburnation. sent10: that the malmsey is a clasp and a crest is wrong. sent11: if the hake is not a crest then the fact that the malfeasant does crest and is digital does not hold. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not rede powderer then the tail objects. sent13: something is not digital. sent14: that the hake is a kind of digital thing that is a squab is not true if the exotherm is not digital. sent15: the hake is both digital and a squab if the exotherm is not digital. sent16: the tail is digital. sent17: the fact that the exotherm is digital and it redes powderer is false. sent18: there exists something such that it does crest. sent19: the hake is digital and it is a kind of a squab.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malfeasant is not a crest.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a crest.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the tail is not a kind of an object and/or it does not rede powderer does not hold is true.;
$hypothesis$ = if the malfeasant is not a kind of a crest then the fact that the hake is digital and a squab is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the co-beneficiary does object. sent2: the tail objects. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a crest then the tail objects. sent4: the fact that the fact that the tail is digital and it does crest is not true is not false if that the hake does not rede powderer is correct. sent5: if the tail does not rede powderer the fact that the exotherm rede powderer and is digital is not right. sent6: that the exotherm is not digital is not incorrect if the fact that the tail is an object and/or it does not rede powderer is not correct. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a crest that the tail is not an object and/or it does not rede powderer is not correct. sent8: the hake is both digital and a squab if the malfeasant is not a kind of a crest. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a eburnation. sent10: that the malmsey is a clasp and a crest is wrong. sent11: if the hake is not a crest then the fact that the malfeasant does crest and is digital does not hold. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not rede powderer then the tail objects. sent13: something is not digital. sent14: that the hake is a kind of digital thing that is a squab is not true if the exotherm is not digital. sent15: the hake is both digital and a squab if the exotherm is not digital. sent16: the tail is digital. sent17: the fact that the exotherm is digital and it redes powderer is false. sent18: there exists something such that it does crest. sent19: the hake is digital and it is a kind of a squab. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malfeasant is not a crest.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a crest.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the tail is not a kind of an object and/or it does not rede powderer does not hold is true.; __UNKNOWN__