that the brachiopod does not occur and the danger does not occur leads to that the bethinking does not occur.
sent1: that the brachiopod does not occur but the danger occurs triggers the detailing retaliation. sent2: if both the non-brachiopodness and the danger occurs the bethinking does not occur. sent3: the bethinking does not occur if the fluvialness happens and the detailing retaliation occurs. sent4: that the detailing retaliation does not occur brings about that the clangoring irritant happens and the fluvialness occurs. sent5: the detailing topping occurs. sent6: both the detailing topping and the fluvialness happens. sent7: the bethinking happens. sent8: that the detailing retaliation does not occur is prevented by that the brachiopod does not occur and the danger does not occur. sent9: the danger does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the brachiopod does not occur and the danger does not occur is right.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the detailing retaliation happens.; sent6 -> int2: that the fluvialness occurs is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the fluvialness and the detailing retaliation occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the bethinking does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the clangoring irritant occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the brachiopod does not occur and the danger does not occur leads to that the bethinking does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the brachiopod does not occur but the danger occurs triggers the detailing retaliation. sent2: if both the non-brachiopodness and the danger occurs the bethinking does not occur. sent3: the bethinking does not occur if the fluvialness happens and the detailing retaliation occurs. sent4: that the detailing retaliation does not occur brings about that the clangoring irritant happens and the fluvialness occurs. sent5: the detailing topping occurs. sent6: both the detailing topping and the fluvialness happens. sent7: the bethinking happens. sent8: that the detailing retaliation does not occur is prevented by that the brachiopod does not occur and the danger does not occur. sent9: the danger does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the brachiopod does not occur and the danger does not occur is right.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the detailing retaliation happens.; sent6 -> int2: that the fluvialness occurs is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the fluvialness and the detailing retaliation occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the bethinking does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__