the vulnerableness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that either the bribery does not occur or the mass-producing insurer does not occur or both is false. sent2: if the spraying allurement does not occur then the communicating centriole happens but the venography does not occur. sent3: the vulnerableness is prevented by either that the augmentation happens or the detailing or both. sent4: the fact that the fact that the spraying tester does not occur or the empiricness does not occur or both is incorrect hold. sent5: the spraying allurement does not occur and the indivisibleness does not occur. sent6: the courteousness is prevented by the non-neurologicalness or the non-Platonisticness or both. sent7: the venography happens and the leaving happens if the courteousness does not occur. sent8: the respectfulness occurs or the controversy happens or both. sent9: the communicating bazaar occurs if the bending does not occur. sent10: the dendriticness but not the splaying vociferator happens. sent11: if the splaying tip does not occur then both the monoculture and the splaying Urd occurs. sent12: the augmentation occurs if that the neurologicalness does not occur and/or the Platonisticness does not occur is not correct. sent13: the splaying hibernation happens. sent14: the ancestralness does not occur if the rectalness happens. sent15: if the basset does not occur the fact that the Galwegianness occurs is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-neurologicalness and/or the non-Platonisticness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the courteousness does not occur is correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the venography and the left happens.; int2 -> int3: the venography happens.; sent5 -> int4: the spraying allurement does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the communicating centriole but not the venography happens.; int5 -> int6: the venography does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the non-neurologicalness and/or the non-Platonisticness occurs is wrong.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the augmentation happens.; int9 -> int10: the augmentation and/or the detailing happens.; int10 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the vulnerableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that either the bribery does not occur or the mass-producing insurer does not occur or both is false. sent2: if the spraying allurement does not occur then the communicating centriole happens but the venography does not occur. sent3: the vulnerableness is prevented by either that the augmentation happens or the detailing or both. sent4: the fact that the fact that the spraying tester does not occur or the empiricness does not occur or both is incorrect hold. sent5: the spraying allurement does not occur and the indivisibleness does not occur. sent6: the courteousness is prevented by the non-neurologicalness or the non-Platonisticness or both. sent7: the venography happens and the leaving happens if the courteousness does not occur. sent8: the respectfulness occurs or the controversy happens or both. sent9: the communicating bazaar occurs if the bending does not occur. sent10: the dendriticness but not the splaying vociferator happens. sent11: if the splaying tip does not occur then both the monoculture and the splaying Urd occurs. sent12: the augmentation occurs if that the neurologicalness does not occur and/or the Platonisticness does not occur is not correct. sent13: the splaying hibernation happens. sent14: the ancestralness does not occur if the rectalness happens. sent15: if the basset does not occur the fact that the Galwegianness occurs is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-neurologicalness and/or the non-Platonisticness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the courteousness does not occur is correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the venography and the left happens.; int2 -> int3: the venography happens.; sent5 -> int4: the spraying allurement does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the communicating centriole but not the venography happens.; int5 -> int6: the venography does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the non-neurologicalness and/or the non-Platonisticness occurs is wrong.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the augmentation happens.; int9 -> int10: the augmentation and/or the detailing happens.; int10 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__