that there exists something such that if it does confront and it is not residential it is a reentry is false.
sent1: that there exists something such that if it is a gasification and it is a Fonda then it subjects Leucaena is not incorrect. sent2: the individualist is Jacksonian if it is residential and does not deprive bandtail. sent3: the individualist is cosmologic if it is a kind of a reentry that deprives chrysoberyl. sent4: if that the individualist confronts and is not residential is right it is a reentry. sent5: there is something such that if it is pacific and it is not a pen then it is intercostal. sent6: there is something such that if it is a hagfish and is not a tallith it does subject buffoonery. sent7: there is something such that if it is a crookedness and is not a kind of a row then it deprives love. sent8: the drill is a reentry if it is a buskin and it does blitz. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it does confront and it is residential is not false it is a kind of a reentry. sent10: the individualist is a trait if it is a feather and does not subject Parashurama. sent11: if the individualist does confront and it is residential it is a kind of a reentry. sent12: if the individualist is a diocese but it does not confront it is a smooth. sent13: there is something such that if that it deprives chauffeuse and it subjects dished is not wrong then it is a kind of a peek. sent14: the individualist is a reentry if it is a right-handedness and it is a Bangladeshi. sent15: there is something such that if it does deprive limbers and is not pacific then it does subject Ka. sent16: if the bola is a reentry and it is a kind of a calyptra then it is a Cohn. sent17: if something is a slalom but it is not a photoelectron it is a shrine. sent18: the individualist is a drum if it does narrate dray and it does not confront. sent19: there exists something such that if it is brachial and it is consonantal then it is occupational.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is a slalom and it is not a photoelectron then it is a kind of a shrine.
sent17 -> int1: the limbers is a kind of a shrine if it slaloms and it is not a photoelectron.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does confront and it is not residential it is a reentry is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that there exists something such that if it is a gasification and it is a Fonda then it subjects Leucaena is not incorrect. sent2: the individualist is Jacksonian if it is residential and does not deprive bandtail. sent3: the individualist is cosmologic if it is a kind of a reentry that deprives chrysoberyl. sent4: if that the individualist confronts and is not residential is right it is a reentry. sent5: there is something such that if it is pacific and it is not a pen then it is intercostal. sent6: there is something such that if it is a hagfish and is not a tallith it does subject buffoonery. sent7: there is something such that if it is a crookedness and is not a kind of a row then it deprives love. sent8: the drill is a reentry if it is a buskin and it does blitz. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it does confront and it is residential is not false it is a kind of a reentry. sent10: the individualist is a trait if it is a feather and does not subject Parashurama. sent11: if the individualist does confront and it is residential it is a kind of a reentry. sent12: if the individualist is a diocese but it does not confront it is a smooth. sent13: there is something such that if that it deprives chauffeuse and it subjects dished is not wrong then it is a kind of a peek. sent14: the individualist is a reentry if it is a right-handedness and it is a Bangladeshi. sent15: there is something such that if it does deprive limbers and is not pacific then it does subject Ka. sent16: if the bola is a reentry and it is a kind of a calyptra then it is a Cohn. sent17: if something is a slalom but it is not a photoelectron it is a shrine. sent18: the individualist is a drum if it does narrate dray and it does not confront. sent19: there exists something such that if it is brachial and it is consonantal then it is occupational. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__