the magpie accelerates.
sent1: something accelerates if the fact that it is a countersink is not wrong. sent2: the livestock does not avoid Machiavellianism and it is not a kind of a fluorochrome. sent3: the seaway does avoid snifter if the kentan is archipelagic. sent4: something that is palpebrate is a fluorochrome. sent5: if the seaway is a Wycherley then the kentan does avoid snifter. sent6: something is archipelagic if that it is not a Wycherley and/or is not irreducible is not true. sent7: the fact that if the polygynist is not a kind of a Wycherley then the fact that the kentan is not a Wycherley and/or it is not irreducible is false hold. sent8: if something does not avoid Machiavellianism and it is not a kind of a fluorochrome then that it does not accelerate is not wrong. sent9: if the livestock does not avoid Machiavellianism that the polygynist does zone seaway and avoid Machiavellianism is not correct. sent10: the livestock does not avoid Machiavellianism if it does not avoid snifter. sent11: the kentan is irreducible if the polygynist is not a Wycherley. sent12: if the fact that something does zone seaway and it does avoid Machiavellianism is not right the fact that it is not a Wycherley is not incorrect. sent13: the magpie is a countersink if the seaway does avoid snifter.
sent2 -> int1: the livestock does not avoid Machiavellianism.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the polygynist zones seaway and it avoids Machiavellianism is right is wrong.; sent12 -> int3: if the fact that the polygynist does zone seaway and does avoid Machiavellianism is not correct it is not a Wycherley.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the polygynist is not a kind of a Wycherley hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the kentan is not a Wycherley and/or it is not irreducible does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: if the fact that the kentan is not a kind of a Wycherley or is not irreducible or both does not hold then it is archipelagic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the kentan is archipelagic.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the seaway avoids snifter.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the magpie is a countersink.; sent1 -> int10: if the magpie is a kind of a countersink then it accelerates.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
if the lifeline does palpebrate it is a fluorochrome.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the magpie accelerates. ; $context$ = sent1: something accelerates if the fact that it is a countersink is not wrong. sent2: the livestock does not avoid Machiavellianism and it is not a kind of a fluorochrome. sent3: the seaway does avoid snifter if the kentan is archipelagic. sent4: something that is palpebrate is a fluorochrome. sent5: if the seaway is a Wycherley then the kentan does avoid snifter. sent6: something is archipelagic if that it is not a Wycherley and/or is not irreducible is not true. sent7: the fact that if the polygynist is not a kind of a Wycherley then the fact that the kentan is not a Wycherley and/or it is not irreducible is false hold. sent8: if something does not avoid Machiavellianism and it is not a kind of a fluorochrome then that it does not accelerate is not wrong. sent9: if the livestock does not avoid Machiavellianism that the polygynist does zone seaway and avoid Machiavellianism is not correct. sent10: the livestock does not avoid Machiavellianism if it does not avoid snifter. sent11: the kentan is irreducible if the polygynist is not a Wycherley. sent12: if the fact that something does zone seaway and it does avoid Machiavellianism is not right the fact that it is not a Wycherley is not incorrect. sent13: the magpie is a countersink if the seaway does avoid snifter. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the livestock does not avoid Machiavellianism.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the polygynist zones seaway and it avoids Machiavellianism is right is wrong.; sent12 -> int3: if the fact that the polygynist does zone seaway and does avoid Machiavellianism is not correct it is not a Wycherley.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the polygynist is not a kind of a Wycherley hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the kentan is not a Wycherley and/or it is not irreducible does not hold.; sent6 -> int6: if the fact that the kentan is not a kind of a Wycherley or is not irreducible or both does not hold then it is archipelagic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the kentan is archipelagic.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the seaway avoids snifter.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the magpie is a countersink.; sent1 -> int10: if the magpie is a kind of a countersink then it accelerates.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__