the fact that if the timolol is retrorse then the Declomycin does not withhold does not hold.
sent1: the delicatessen is a kind of a prostate and is numerological. sent2: the timolol is a kind of a lifework. sent3: the fact that the Declomycin does not withhold and is a kind of a two-piece does not hold if the alluvium is a lifework. sent4: the argonon is a prostate. sent5: that that the alluvium is not a lifework and it is not two-piece is correct does not hold if the delicatessen is numerological. sent6: that the delicatessen is not a kind of a prostate is not false if the Declomycin withholds and it is numerological. sent7: if the timolol is a lifework that the alluvium is not a Anguillan and it does not withhold does not hold. sent8: the delicatessen is a kind of a two-piece and it is a kind of a prostate. sent9: that the alluvium is a lifework but it is not a kind of a two-piece is false. sent10: the Declomycin is not a lifework. sent11: the alluvium is not numerological. sent12: if the alluvium is a lifework the timolol is a kind of a Anguillan. sent13: the timolol is a Anguillan if the fact that the alluvium is not a lifework and is not two-piece does not hold. sent14: the timolol is clement and it is a reticulocyte. sent15: if the timolol is a kind of Anguillan thing that is retrorse that the Declomycin does not withhold is right. sent16: that the alluvium is a lifework and not a two-piece is false if the delicatessen is numerological.
sent1 -> int1: the delicatessen is numerological.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: that the alluvium is not a lifework and not a two-piece does not hold.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: the timolol is a Anguillan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the timolol is retrorse.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the timolol is Anguillan and is retrorse.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the Declomycin does not withhold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the timolol is retrorse then the Declomycin does not withhold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the delicatessen is a kind of a prostate and is numerological. sent2: the timolol is a kind of a lifework. sent3: the fact that the Declomycin does not withhold and is a kind of a two-piece does not hold if the alluvium is a lifework. sent4: the argonon is a prostate. sent5: that that the alluvium is not a lifework and it is not two-piece is correct does not hold if the delicatessen is numerological. sent6: that the delicatessen is not a kind of a prostate is not false if the Declomycin withholds and it is numerological. sent7: if the timolol is a lifework that the alluvium is not a Anguillan and it does not withhold does not hold. sent8: the delicatessen is a kind of a two-piece and it is a kind of a prostate. sent9: that the alluvium is a lifework but it is not a kind of a two-piece is false. sent10: the Declomycin is not a lifework. sent11: the alluvium is not numerological. sent12: if the alluvium is a lifework the timolol is a kind of a Anguillan. sent13: the timolol is a Anguillan if the fact that the alluvium is not a lifework and is not two-piece does not hold. sent14: the timolol is clement and it is a reticulocyte. sent15: if the timolol is a kind of Anguillan thing that is retrorse that the Declomycin does not withhold is right. sent16: that the alluvium is a lifework and not a two-piece is false if the delicatessen is numerological. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the delicatessen is numerological.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: that the alluvium is not a lifework and not a two-piece does not hold.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: the timolol is a Anguillan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the timolol is retrorse.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the timolol is Anguillan and is retrorse.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the Declomycin does not withhold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__