the fact that the illumination is not basilican hold.
sent1: if the still is not a Megachiroptera then the fact that the illumination is basilican or it is extrasensory or both is not correct. sent2: if the bollard is a kind of a Megachiroptera then the catchment is a kind of a Megachiroptera. sent3: the bollard does impale if that the fact that either it is not anthropological or it collars still or both is right is not correct. sent4: the release is a kind of extrasensory a Megachiroptera. sent5: the fact that something clouts Ranunculus but it does not clout ensign is not right if it is extrasensory. sent6: the illumination is not basilican if the release does clout ensign. sent7: if something is not credible it does question and entails irresponsibility. sent8: the fact that the release does clout Ranunculus and it does clout ensign is incorrect. sent9: if the release is extrasensory that it clouts Ranunculus and does clout ensign is false. sent10: the release is a Megachiroptera. sent11: if that the illumination does clout Ranunculus and does not clout ensign is not right the release is not basilican. sent12: if something is a questioning then it is a Megachiroptera. sent13: the still is extrasensory if the fact that the catchment is a Megachiroptera is not wrong. sent14: the illumination is basilican if that the still is extrasensory is correct. sent15: if something that impales is a halogen it is not credible.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the release does clout Ranunculus and does not clout ensign is wrong if it is extrasensory.; sent4 -> int2: the release is extrasensory.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the release does clout Ranunculus and does not clout ensign is incorrect.;
the illumination is basilican.
sent12 -> int4: the bollard is a Megachiroptera if it does question.; sent7 -> int5: if the bollard is not credible then it questions and it entails irresponsibility.; sent15 -> int6: the bollard is not credible if it impales and is a halogen.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the illumination is not basilican hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the still is not a Megachiroptera then the fact that the illumination is basilican or it is extrasensory or both is not correct. sent2: if the bollard is a kind of a Megachiroptera then the catchment is a kind of a Megachiroptera. sent3: the bollard does impale if that the fact that either it is not anthropological or it collars still or both is right is not correct. sent4: the release is a kind of extrasensory a Megachiroptera. sent5: the fact that something clouts Ranunculus but it does not clout ensign is not right if it is extrasensory. sent6: the illumination is not basilican if the release does clout ensign. sent7: if something is not credible it does question and entails irresponsibility. sent8: the fact that the release does clout Ranunculus and it does clout ensign is incorrect. sent9: if the release is extrasensory that it clouts Ranunculus and does clout ensign is false. sent10: the release is a Megachiroptera. sent11: if that the illumination does clout Ranunculus and does not clout ensign is not right the release is not basilican. sent12: if something is a questioning then it is a Megachiroptera. sent13: the still is extrasensory if the fact that the catchment is a Megachiroptera is not wrong. sent14: the illumination is basilican if that the still is extrasensory is correct. sent15: if something that impales is a halogen it is not credible. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the release does clout Ranunculus and does not clout ensign is wrong if it is extrasensory.; sent4 -> int2: the release is extrasensory.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the release does clout Ranunculus and does not clout ensign is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__