that that the collar does not purify pluperfect and is interdepartmental is correct is false.
sent1: the farfalle does not scourge brand-newness if it is a kind of abdominal thing that is onomastic. sent2: that the purification is planar but it is not an abdominal is not true if the silt is not abdominal. sent3: the fact that the purification is planar thing that is not an abdominal is not correct. sent4: the collar does not scourge hegemon. sent5: that the farfalle does not scourge brand-newness hold if the purification does canvass. sent6: the farfalle is onomastic if it is not a kind of a tuber. sent7: that the purification is not an abdominal and it does not vault glamor does not hold. sent8: the collar does not vault glamor if it does not scourge hegemon and is one-piece. sent9: the fact that that something does not purify pluperfect and is interdepartmental is not true if it does not vault glamor is correct. sent10: there is something such that it does not scourge hegemon and is a tuber. sent11: the fact that the purification does not vault glamor but it is planar is not right if it is not onomastic. sent12: something does canvass but it is not planar if it does not scourge brand-newness. sent13: if that something is not planar and not an abdominal is not correct it canvasses. sent14: the silt does purify pluperfect. sent15: if the silt is not abdominal that the purification is not planar and it is not a kind of an abdominal is incorrect. sent16: that that the purification is a kind of non-planar an abdominal is true is wrong if the silt is not a kind of an abdominal. sent17: the farfalle is not a tuber. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not scourge hegemon and is one-piece is not true the silt is not abdominal. sent19: the fact that the collar does purify pluperfect and it is interdepartmental is false. sent20: the collar does not purify pluperfect but it is interdepartmental if it is an abdominal. sent21: the farfalle is onomastic and does scourge brand-newness if it is not a kind of a tuber. sent22: the purification does vault glamor and is not non-onomastic. sent23: the collar is prepositional and it is a surfeit.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the collar does not scourge hegemon but it is one-piece is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not scourge hegemon and is one-piece does not hold.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the silt is non-abdominal.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that that the purification is not planar and is not an abdominal is not false is not correct.; sent13 -> int4: if the fact that that the purification is both not planar and not an abdominal is not right is correct then it does canvass.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the purification canvasses.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the farfalle does not scourge brand-newness.; sent21 & sent17 -> int7: the farfalle is onomastic and it does scourge brand-newness.; int7 -> int8: the farfalle does scourge brand-newness.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the collar does not scourge hegemon and is one-piece.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the collar does not vault glamor.; sent9 -> int12: the fact that the fact that the collar does not purify pluperfect but it is interdepartmental is false is correct if it does not vault glamor.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the collar does not purify pluperfect but it is interdepartmental.
sent12 -> int13: if the silt does not scourge brand-newness it canvasses and it is not planar.; sent22 -> int14: the purification vaults glamor.; int14 -> int15: something does vault glamor.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the collar does not purify pluperfect and is interdepartmental is correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the farfalle does not scourge brand-newness if it is a kind of abdominal thing that is onomastic. sent2: that the purification is planar but it is not an abdominal is not true if the silt is not abdominal. sent3: the fact that the purification is planar thing that is not an abdominal is not correct. sent4: the collar does not scourge hegemon. sent5: that the farfalle does not scourge brand-newness hold if the purification does canvass. sent6: the farfalle is onomastic if it is not a kind of a tuber. sent7: that the purification is not an abdominal and it does not vault glamor does not hold. sent8: the collar does not vault glamor if it does not scourge hegemon and is one-piece. sent9: the fact that that something does not purify pluperfect and is interdepartmental is not true if it does not vault glamor is correct. sent10: there is something such that it does not scourge hegemon and is a tuber. sent11: the fact that the purification does not vault glamor but it is planar is not right if it is not onomastic. sent12: something does canvass but it is not planar if it does not scourge brand-newness. sent13: if that something is not planar and not an abdominal is not correct it canvasses. sent14: the silt does purify pluperfect. sent15: if the silt is not abdominal that the purification is not planar and it is not a kind of an abdominal is incorrect. sent16: that that the purification is a kind of non-planar an abdominal is true is wrong if the silt is not a kind of an abdominal. sent17: the farfalle is not a tuber. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not scourge hegemon and is one-piece is not true the silt is not abdominal. sent19: the fact that the collar does purify pluperfect and it is interdepartmental is false. sent20: the collar does not purify pluperfect but it is interdepartmental if it is an abdominal. sent21: the farfalle is onomastic and does scourge brand-newness if it is not a kind of a tuber. sent22: the purification does vault glamor and is not non-onomastic. sent23: the collar is prepositional and it is a surfeit. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the collar does not scourge hegemon but it is one-piece is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not scourge hegemon and is one-piece does not hold.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the silt is non-abdominal.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that that the purification is not planar and is not an abdominal is not false is not correct.; sent13 -> int4: if the fact that that the purification is both not planar and not an abdominal is not right is correct then it does canvass.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the purification canvasses.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the farfalle does not scourge brand-newness.; sent21 & sent17 -> int7: the farfalle is onomastic and it does scourge brand-newness.; int7 -> int8: the farfalle does scourge brand-newness.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the collar does not scourge hegemon and is one-piece.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the collar does not vault glamor.; sent9 -> int12: the fact that the fact that the collar does not purify pluperfect but it is interdepartmental is false is correct if it does not vault glamor.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__