the Singaporean is not a LLM.
sent1: the fact that the steelmaker is a Smalley is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a chatroom and not a denigration does not hold. sent2: the fact that the variation does glamorize stock is right if the FET is not a kind of a chatroom and it is not a denigration. sent3: that the Singaporean is carroty or is not a Smalley or both is correct if the steelmaker is a Smalley. sent4: there exists something such that that it does copy insensitivity and it does not glamorize scrub is not correct. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does copy insensitivity and does not glamorize scrub is not correct the fact that the variation does not glamorize stock hold. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a swanflower and it is not a XXX hold. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a chatroom and does not glamorize stock is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the FET is not a chatroom and is not a kind of a denigration.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the variation does glamorize stock.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the variation does not glamorize stock.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the FET is not a chatroom and is not a denigration is incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a chatroom and is not a denigration is not right.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the steelmaker is a Smalley.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the Singaporean is carroty and/or it is not a Smalley.;
$hypothesis$ = the Singaporean is not a LLM. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the steelmaker is a Smalley is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a chatroom and not a denigration does not hold. sent2: the fact that the variation does glamorize stock is right if the FET is not a kind of a chatroom and it is not a denigration. sent3: that the Singaporean is carroty or is not a Smalley or both is correct if the steelmaker is a Smalley. sent4: there exists something such that that it does copy insensitivity and it does not glamorize scrub is not correct. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it does copy insensitivity and does not glamorize scrub is not correct the fact that the variation does not glamorize stock hold. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a swanflower and it is not a XXX hold. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a chatroom and does not glamorize stock is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the FET is not a chatroom and is not a kind of a denigration.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the variation does glamorize stock.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the variation does not glamorize stock.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the FET is not a chatroom and is not a denigration is incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a chatroom and is not a denigration is not right.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the steelmaker is a Smalley.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the Singaporean is carroty and/or it is not a Smalley.; __UNKNOWN__