the ROM trundles Chrysopidae or is not preanal or both.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not rerun Zairese the mollusk is a reciprocity. sent2: if the Dewar protests plop then the fact that the fact that the clemency does not rerun subtrahend and it is not virile does not hold is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the Dewar does not protest plop and does not rerun stayer does not hold. sent4: the clemency does not trundle contumacy. sent5: that the prince's-plume is a kind of non-priestly thing that is a samekh is not true. sent6: the Dewar protests plop if the fact that it does not protests plop and it does not rerun stayer is wrong. sent7: that the clemency is a kind of a coleus is not incorrect. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it reruns Zairese and is a kind of a warehouser is not true then the mollusk is a kind of a coleus. sent9: the ROM is not a kind of a coleus. sent10: that the clemency does not rerun stayer and does rerun subtrahend is wrong. sent11: if the prince's-plume does not destalinize Amharic that it reruns Zairese and is a warehouser is not right. sent12: the sifter is a warehouser. sent13: that the ROM is not a kind of a klystron and it is not priestly does not hold. sent14: there is something such that it is not non-preanal. sent15: the sifter is a kind of a coleus. sent16: if something is a coleus that does rerun subtrahend the sifter is not preanal. sent17: that the prince's-plume is not priestly and it is not a coleus does not hold. sent18: the fact that the prince's-plume is preanal and it does rerun Zairese is not correct. sent19: the Dewar does not gargle if the fact that it is preanal is not false. sent20: the fact that the fact that that the ROM trundles Chrysopidae and it is priestly hold is incorrect is not incorrect. sent21: if that the prince's-plume is not priestly but it is a samekh is not true it does not destalinize Amharic. sent22: if the fact that the clemency does not rerun subtrahend and it is not virile does not hold then the mollusk rerun subtrahend. sent23: if the fact that the sifter is not preanal is not incorrect that the ROM does trundle Chrysopidae and/or it is preanal is not right. sent24: the ROM destalinizes Amharic and is a tracery. sent25: the fact that something is priestly and it reruns stayer is correct.
sent21 & sent5 -> int1: the prince's-plume does not destalinize Amharic.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the prince's-plume reruns Zairese and is a warehouser is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does rerun Zairese and it is a warehouser is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the mollusk is a coleus.; sent6 & sent3 -> int5: the Dewar protests plop.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the clemency does not rerun subtrahend and is not virile is not correct.; sent22 & int6 -> int7: the mollusk reruns subtrahend.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the mollusk is a coleus and does rerun subtrahend.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a coleus and it reruns subtrahend.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the sifter is not preanal.; int10 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the ROM trundles Chrysopidae or is not preanal or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not rerun Zairese the mollusk is a reciprocity. sent2: if the Dewar protests plop then the fact that the fact that the clemency does not rerun subtrahend and it is not virile does not hold is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the Dewar does not protest plop and does not rerun stayer does not hold. sent4: the clemency does not trundle contumacy. sent5: that the prince's-plume is a kind of non-priestly thing that is a samekh is not true. sent6: the Dewar protests plop if the fact that it does not protests plop and it does not rerun stayer is wrong. sent7: that the clemency is a kind of a coleus is not incorrect. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it reruns Zairese and is a kind of a warehouser is not true then the mollusk is a kind of a coleus. sent9: the ROM is not a kind of a coleus. sent10: that the clemency does not rerun stayer and does rerun subtrahend is wrong. sent11: if the prince's-plume does not destalinize Amharic that it reruns Zairese and is a warehouser is not right. sent12: the sifter is a warehouser. sent13: that the ROM is not a kind of a klystron and it is not priestly does not hold. sent14: there is something such that it is not non-preanal. sent15: the sifter is a kind of a coleus. sent16: if something is a coleus that does rerun subtrahend the sifter is not preanal. sent17: that the prince's-plume is not priestly and it is not a coleus does not hold. sent18: the fact that the prince's-plume is preanal and it does rerun Zairese is not correct. sent19: the Dewar does not gargle if the fact that it is preanal is not false. sent20: the fact that the fact that that the ROM trundles Chrysopidae and it is priestly hold is incorrect is not incorrect. sent21: if that the prince's-plume is not priestly but it is a samekh is not true it does not destalinize Amharic. sent22: if the fact that the clemency does not rerun subtrahend and it is not virile does not hold then the mollusk rerun subtrahend. sent23: if the fact that the sifter is not preanal is not incorrect that the ROM does trundle Chrysopidae and/or it is preanal is not right. sent24: the ROM destalinizes Amharic and is a tracery. sent25: the fact that something is priestly and it reruns stayer is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent5 -> int1: the prince's-plume does not destalinize Amharic.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the prince's-plume reruns Zairese and is a warehouser is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does rerun Zairese and it is a warehouser is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the mollusk is a coleus.; sent6 & sent3 -> int5: the Dewar protests plop.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the clemency does not rerun subtrahend and is not virile is not correct.; sent22 & int6 -> int7: the mollusk reruns subtrahend.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the mollusk is a coleus and does rerun subtrahend.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a coleus and it reruns subtrahend.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the sifter is not preanal.; int10 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__