both the unactableness and the abusing Turk occurs.
sent1: the disbarment does not occur. sent2: that the aggravation happens is prevented by that the roboticsness and the ladling coastguardsman happens. sent3: the Boeotianness occurs. sent4: that the nonharmonicness happens and the certifying occurs is wrong. sent5: both the haircare and the headmistressship occurs if the disbarment does not occur. sent6: the theosophicalness does not occur if that that both the metamorphicness and the vacating occurs is not right is right. sent7: that the ladling counterpunch does not occur triggers that the unactableness and the ladling coastguardsman occurs. sent8: if the bottomlessness occurs then the phalloplasty occurs. sent9: if that the ladling counterpunch and the abusing Antioch happens is incorrect then the abusing billionaire does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the thoughtfulness and the interjection happens is wrong then the insentientness does not occur. sent11: both the mythicness and the burying Putin occurs. sent12: if the fact that both the predestinarianness and the sureness occurs does not hold the ladling puncher does not occur. sent13: if the abusing Calliphoridae does not occur the fact that the intifada and the sublittoralness occurs is not correct. sent14: the intrastateness does not occur. sent15: the nonharmonicness happens. sent16: that the fact that the metamorphicness and the sitcom happens is not correct is not wrong if the banishment does not occur. sent17: if that the exhausting does not occur is correct the fact that both the bottomlessness and the photoemissiveness happens does not hold. sent18: the gallop does not occur. sent19: the fact that the achromaticness does not occur hold. sent20: that the ladling counterpunch does not occur hold if that the abusing billionaire and the ladling counterpunch occurs is not correct. sent21: if the jactitation occurs then the covering happens. sent22: the IW occurs. sent23: the authentication occurs. sent24: the abusing billionaire occurs if the haircare occurs. sent25: if the involution does not occur the burying affiant does not occur. sent26: the roboticsness occurs if the IW occurs. sent27: the fact that that the ladling counterpunch occurs and the abusing Antioch happens hold is incorrect if the aggravation does not occur. sent28: if that the ladling coastguardsman does not occur is true the fact that the unactableness and the abusing Turk happens does not hold. sent29: the ladling Herr does not occur if that the ladling surplice and the ectomorphicness happens is wrong.
sent26 & sent22 -> int1: the roboticsness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ladling coastguardsman occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the roboticsness and the ladling coastguardsman happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the aggravation does not occur.; int3 & sent27 -> int4: the fact that both the ladling counterpunch and the abusing Antioch occurs does not hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the abusing billionaire does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int6: the haircare occurs and the headmistressship occurs.; int6 -> int7: the haircare occurs.; sent24 & int7 -> int8: the abusing billionaire happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the ladling coastguardsman does not occur.; int10 & sent28 -> hypothesis;
the unactableness and the abusing Turk occurs.
$hypothesis$ = both the unactableness and the abusing Turk occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the disbarment does not occur. sent2: that the aggravation happens is prevented by that the roboticsness and the ladling coastguardsman happens. sent3: the Boeotianness occurs. sent4: that the nonharmonicness happens and the certifying occurs is wrong. sent5: both the haircare and the headmistressship occurs if the disbarment does not occur. sent6: the theosophicalness does not occur if that that both the metamorphicness and the vacating occurs is not right is right. sent7: that the ladling counterpunch does not occur triggers that the unactableness and the ladling coastguardsman occurs. sent8: if the bottomlessness occurs then the phalloplasty occurs. sent9: if that the ladling counterpunch and the abusing Antioch happens is incorrect then the abusing billionaire does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the thoughtfulness and the interjection happens is wrong then the insentientness does not occur. sent11: both the mythicness and the burying Putin occurs. sent12: if the fact that both the predestinarianness and the sureness occurs does not hold the ladling puncher does not occur. sent13: if the abusing Calliphoridae does not occur the fact that the intifada and the sublittoralness occurs is not correct. sent14: the intrastateness does not occur. sent15: the nonharmonicness happens. sent16: that the fact that the metamorphicness and the sitcom happens is not correct is not wrong if the banishment does not occur. sent17: if that the exhausting does not occur is correct the fact that both the bottomlessness and the photoemissiveness happens does not hold. sent18: the gallop does not occur. sent19: the fact that the achromaticness does not occur hold. sent20: that the ladling counterpunch does not occur hold if that the abusing billionaire and the ladling counterpunch occurs is not correct. sent21: if the jactitation occurs then the covering happens. sent22: the IW occurs. sent23: the authentication occurs. sent24: the abusing billionaire occurs if the haircare occurs. sent25: if the involution does not occur the burying affiant does not occur. sent26: the roboticsness occurs if the IW occurs. sent27: the fact that that the ladling counterpunch occurs and the abusing Antioch happens hold is incorrect if the aggravation does not occur. sent28: if that the ladling coastguardsman does not occur is true the fact that the unactableness and the abusing Turk happens does not hold. sent29: the ladling Herr does not occur if that the ladling surplice and the ectomorphicness happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent26 & sent22 -> int1: the roboticsness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ladling coastguardsman occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the roboticsness and the ladling coastguardsman happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the aggravation does not occur.; int3 & sent27 -> int4: the fact that both the ladling counterpunch and the abusing Antioch occurs does not hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the abusing billionaire does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int6: the haircare occurs and the headmistressship occurs.; int6 -> int7: the haircare occurs.; sent24 & int7 -> int8: the abusing billionaire happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the ladling coastguardsman does not occur.; int10 & sent28 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__