the puppeteer is not sugarless.
sent1: the fact that the facilitation is a coiled is right. sent2: if the facilitation is ctenoid and a continence then the puppeteer is not sugarless. sent3: that the facilitation is a continence and undrinkable if the man-on-a-horse is not a kind of a ginseng is correct. sent4: the man-on-a-horse is not a ginseng. sent5: the facilitation coils if the psalterium is not bellyless. sent6: if the fact that something is both not incongruous and unimportant is not correct then the fact that it is not bellyless is right. sent7: the sieve is ctenoid. sent8: the facilitation is a kind of a coiled and it is ctenoid if the psalterium is not bellyless. sent9: the fact that the psalterium is not incongruous but it is unimportant does not hold if it does not wrong. sent10: that the psalterium is incongruous and unimportant is not right. sent11: the psalterium is not a wrong.
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the psalterium is not incongruous but it is unimportant does not hold.; sent6 -> int2: if that the psalterium is not incongruous but it is unimportant is not right then the fact that it is not bellyless is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the psalterium is not bellyless.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the facilitation does coil and is ctenoid.; int4 -> int5: the facilitation is ctenoid.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the facilitation is a kind of a continence and it is undrinkable.; int6 -> int7: the facilitation is a kind of a continence.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the facilitation is ctenoid and is a continence.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the sieve is ctenoid a Umbrian.
$hypothesis$ = the puppeteer is not sugarless. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the facilitation is a coiled is right. sent2: if the facilitation is ctenoid and a continence then the puppeteer is not sugarless. sent3: that the facilitation is a continence and undrinkable if the man-on-a-horse is not a kind of a ginseng is correct. sent4: the man-on-a-horse is not a ginseng. sent5: the facilitation coils if the psalterium is not bellyless. sent6: if the fact that something is both not incongruous and unimportant is not correct then the fact that it is not bellyless is right. sent7: the sieve is ctenoid. sent8: the facilitation is a kind of a coiled and it is ctenoid if the psalterium is not bellyless. sent9: the fact that the psalterium is not incongruous but it is unimportant does not hold if it does not wrong. sent10: that the psalterium is incongruous and unimportant is not right. sent11: the psalterium is not a wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the psalterium is not incongruous but it is unimportant does not hold.; sent6 -> int2: if that the psalterium is not incongruous but it is unimportant is not right then the fact that it is not bellyless is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the psalterium is not bellyless.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the facilitation does coil and is ctenoid.; int4 -> int5: the facilitation is ctenoid.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the facilitation is a kind of a continence and it is undrinkable.; int6 -> int7: the facilitation is a kind of a continence.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the facilitation is ctenoid and is a continence.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__