that that the headman is not a imperium and/or it is a kind of a Canada is wrong if the erosion does lighten is wrong.
sent1: that the headman is a imperium or it is a Canada or both is not correct if it does clap Brioschi. sent2: if the erosion does lighten the fact that the headman is an accusative and it is a few is false. sent3: that something is not a cubby but it is a Cimex does not hold if the fact that it does not lighten hold. sent4: the headman claps Brioschi if it is accusative. sent5: if the headman does clap Brioschi then it is not a kind of a Canada. sent6: the granite is a imperium. sent7: if the fact that something does not clap Brioschi and is a kind of a Canada does not hold it does not lighten. sent8: if the headman is a Canada that the erosion is not a few and does lighten is not right. sent9: the fact that the foodstuff does not clap Brioschi but it is a kind of a Canada is not true if the erosion is not a imperium. sent10: something is not a imperium and/or it is a kind of a Canada if it claps Brioschi. sent11: the fact that the headman is an accusative that is a few is not right. sent12: if the erosion lightens then that the headman is non-accusative and not non-few is incorrect. sent13: the fact that something is not a kind of a imperium or is a Canada or both is incorrect if it claps Brioschi. sent14: that the headman is an accusative and/or it is a kind of a few is incorrect if that the erosion is a imperium hold. sent15: the headman is not a imperium or it is a kind of a Canada or both if that the erosion does lighten is not incorrect. sent16: if the headman does clap Brioschi then it is not a imperium and/or it is a Canada. sent17: the headman is not a Canada. sent18: if the fact that something is not accusative and is a few is false it does clap Brioschi.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the erosion does lighten.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the headman is both not an accusative and few does not hold.; sent18 -> int2: if the fact that the headman is a kind of non-accusative thing that is a few is incorrect then it claps Brioschi.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the headman does clap Brioschi.; sent13 -> int4: the fact that either the headman is not a imperium or it is a Canada or both does not hold if the fact that it claps Brioschi is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the headman either is not a imperium or is a kind of a Canada or both does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the foodstuff is not a kind of a cubby and is a kind of a Cimex is false.
sent3 -> int6: that the foodstuff is not a cubby and is a Cimex is false if it does not lighten.; sent7 -> int7: the foodstuff does not lighten if that it does not clap Brioschi and is a kind of a Canada is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the headman is not a imperium and/or it is a kind of a Canada is wrong if the erosion does lighten is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the headman is a imperium or it is a Canada or both is not correct if it does clap Brioschi. sent2: if the erosion does lighten the fact that the headman is an accusative and it is a few is false. sent3: that something is not a cubby but it is a Cimex does not hold if the fact that it does not lighten hold. sent4: the headman claps Brioschi if it is accusative. sent5: if the headman does clap Brioschi then it is not a kind of a Canada. sent6: the granite is a imperium. sent7: if the fact that something does not clap Brioschi and is a kind of a Canada does not hold it does not lighten. sent8: if the headman is a Canada that the erosion is not a few and does lighten is not right. sent9: the fact that the foodstuff does not clap Brioschi but it is a kind of a Canada is not true if the erosion is not a imperium. sent10: something is not a imperium and/or it is a kind of a Canada if it claps Brioschi. sent11: the fact that the headman is an accusative that is a few is not right. sent12: if the erosion lightens then that the headman is non-accusative and not non-few is incorrect. sent13: the fact that something is not a kind of a imperium or is a Canada or both is incorrect if it claps Brioschi. sent14: that the headman is an accusative and/or it is a kind of a few is incorrect if that the erosion is a imperium hold. sent15: the headman is not a imperium or it is a kind of a Canada or both if that the erosion does lighten is not incorrect. sent16: if the headman does clap Brioschi then it is not a imperium and/or it is a Canada. sent17: the headman is not a Canada. sent18: if the fact that something is not accusative and is a few is false it does clap Brioschi. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the erosion does lighten.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the headman is both not an accusative and few does not hold.; sent18 -> int2: if the fact that the headman is a kind of non-accusative thing that is a few is incorrect then it claps Brioschi.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the headman does clap Brioschi.; sent13 -> int4: the fact that either the headman is not a imperium or it is a Canada or both does not hold if the fact that it claps Brioschi is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the headman either is not a imperium or is a kind of a Canada or both does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__