the fact that the investigator is exploratory and it is a rugby is wrong.
sent1: if the hooch is not albitic then the maturation is a government-in-exile and it is a skinny. sent2: the investigator is not a government-in-exile if there exists something such that it is not a vented. sent3: if something is not a government-in-exile it is not nonexploratory. sent4: if that something is non-single and it does not fret Medicare is not correct then it does rede cordierite. sent5: if that the arteriole does not adhere eliminator hold it does rede colonoscope and is a government-in-exile. sent6: if that something is not a government-in-exile hold then it is exploratory a rugby. sent7: there is something such that it does vent. sent8: something is not albitic if that it is not perceptual and it does not rede cordierite is not right. sent9: if the maturation is both a government-in-exile and not non-skinny the investigator is not a vented. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a vented. sent11: the investigator is exploratory. sent12: if the investigator is not a government-in-exile it is exploratory. sent13: that something is exploratory and is a rugby is not true if it is not a vented.
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: that the investigator is not a kind of a government-in-exile hold.; sent6 -> int2: the investigator is exploratory and it is a rugby if that it is not a government-in-exile is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the investigator is not nonexploratory but a rugby is wrong.
sent13 -> int3: that the investigator is exploratory and a rugby is incorrect if it is not a vented.; sent8 -> int4: the hooch is not albitic if that it is not perceptual and does not rede cordierite is incorrect.; sent4 -> int5: the Lidocaine redes cordierite if that it is a kind of non-single thing that does not fret Medicare is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the investigator is exploratory and it is a rugby is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hooch is not albitic then the maturation is a government-in-exile and it is a skinny. sent2: the investigator is not a government-in-exile if there exists something such that it is not a vented. sent3: if something is not a government-in-exile it is not nonexploratory. sent4: if that something is non-single and it does not fret Medicare is not correct then it does rede cordierite. sent5: if that the arteriole does not adhere eliminator hold it does rede colonoscope and is a government-in-exile. sent6: if that something is not a government-in-exile hold then it is exploratory a rugby. sent7: there is something such that it does vent. sent8: something is not albitic if that it is not perceptual and it does not rede cordierite is not right. sent9: if the maturation is both a government-in-exile and not non-skinny the investigator is not a vented. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a vented. sent11: the investigator is exploratory. sent12: if the investigator is not a government-in-exile it is exploratory. sent13: that something is exploratory and is a rugby is not true if it is not a vented. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: that the investigator is not a kind of a government-in-exile hold.; sent6 -> int2: the investigator is exploratory and it is a rugby if that it is not a government-in-exile is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__