that there exists something such that it is a kind of a intestacy and it silences screech does not hold.
sent1: that if the procarbazine is a footfault then the trajectory does quintuple abulia is not wrong. sent2: the trajectory is brassy and it does silence Athapaskan. sent3: if something is not an accusation it articulates and it is a intestacy. sent4: the mica is a intestacy. sent5: if the opium does not silence screech then the procarbazine is a footfault. sent6: the fact that the procarbazine is not a kind of a radiochlorine and does not silence screech is not right. sent7: the trajectory is not unarticulated if the opium is Ibsenian. sent8: the shank is a boatbuilder. sent9: the trajectory is a intestacy if it is not a footfault. sent10: if the opium scours Erasmus then it is Ibsenian. sent11: if something is not a intestacy and/or is a kind of a boatbuilder then the Athapaskan is not a intestacy. sent12: that the procarbazine is an accusation is not false. sent13: the Malto is a footfault. sent14: the trajectory is not a kind of a footfault. sent15: there is something such that it is a intestacy. sent16: the trajectory is not a intestacy or it is a kind of a boatbuilder or both if it does articulate. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a radiochlorine and it is a kind of a boatbuilder the opium does not silence screech. sent18: the opium scours Erasmus. sent19: the fact that the trajectory is not the accusation if the trajectory does not scour Erasmus but it is Ibsenian hold. sent20: if the procarbazine is an accusation the trajectory silences screech. sent21: there exists something such that that it does silence screech is true. sent22: the shank is a radiochlorine. sent23: if something that is not a footfault is a intestacy it is an accusation.
sent9 & sent14 -> int1: the trajectory is a kind of a intestacy.; sent20 & sent12 -> int2: the trajectory silences screech.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trajectory is a kind of a intestacy and silences screech.; int3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it quintuples abulia and articulates.
sent22 & sent8 -> int4: the shank is a radiochlorine and is a boatbuilder.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is a radiochlorine that is a boatbuilder.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the opium does not silence screech.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the procarbazine is a footfault.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the trajectory quintuples abulia.; sent3 -> int9: if the trajectory is not a kind of an accusation then it is articulated and it is a intestacy.;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that it is a kind of a intestacy and it silences screech does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the procarbazine is a footfault then the trajectory does quintuple abulia is not wrong. sent2: the trajectory is brassy and it does silence Athapaskan. sent3: if something is not an accusation it articulates and it is a intestacy. sent4: the mica is a intestacy. sent5: if the opium does not silence screech then the procarbazine is a footfault. sent6: the fact that the procarbazine is not a kind of a radiochlorine and does not silence screech is not right. sent7: the trajectory is not unarticulated if the opium is Ibsenian. sent8: the shank is a boatbuilder. sent9: the trajectory is a intestacy if it is not a footfault. sent10: if the opium scours Erasmus then it is Ibsenian. sent11: if something is not a intestacy and/or is a kind of a boatbuilder then the Athapaskan is not a intestacy. sent12: that the procarbazine is an accusation is not false. sent13: the Malto is a footfault. sent14: the trajectory is not a kind of a footfault. sent15: there is something such that it is a intestacy. sent16: the trajectory is not a intestacy or it is a kind of a boatbuilder or both if it does articulate. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a radiochlorine and it is a kind of a boatbuilder the opium does not silence screech. sent18: the opium scours Erasmus. sent19: the fact that the trajectory is not the accusation if the trajectory does not scour Erasmus but it is Ibsenian hold. sent20: if the procarbazine is an accusation the trajectory silences screech. sent21: there exists something such that that it does silence screech is true. sent22: the shank is a radiochlorine. sent23: if something that is not a footfault is a intestacy it is an accusation. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent14 -> int1: the trajectory is a kind of a intestacy.; sent20 & sent12 -> int2: the trajectory silences screech.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trajectory is a kind of a intestacy and silences screech.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__