the dj concocts synecdoche and is a pogonip.
sent1: that the BB does not concoct synecdoche is not wrong if something is not backward but it ropes Trinitarianism. sent2: there is something such that the fact that either it is a Galilean or it is a melphalan or both is incorrect. sent3: the BB ropes Trinitarianism if there exists something such that that it either is a Galilean or is not a melphalan or both is wrong. sent4: there is something such that it ropes kwela and ropes Trinitarianism. sent5: the fact that that the augite does not rope kwela hold if the fact that the augite does not glare gingersnap but it is a Taurotragus does not hold hold. sent6: the augite does not rope kwela but it is backward. sent7: there is something such that it does not rope kwela. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that either it is a Galilean or it is not a melphalan or both is correct. sent9: something glares gingersnap. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is a Galilean or it is not a melphalan or both is not true. sent11: the dj concocts synecdoche if there exists something such that it does not rope kwela and is backward. sent12: the dj is a pogonip if the BB does rope Trinitarianism. sent13: there is something such that it is a melphalan. sent14: the BB concocts synecdoche. sent15: the augite is backward. sent16: that the augite is a pogonip and is backward is not wrong.
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the BB does rope Trinitarianism.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the dj is a kind of a pogonip.; sent6 -> int3: something does not rope kwela but it is backward.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the dj does concoct synecdoche.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the dj does concoct synecdoche and it is a pogonip is true is false.
$hypothesis$ = the dj concocts synecdoche and is a pogonip. ; $context$ = sent1: that the BB does not concoct synecdoche is not wrong if something is not backward but it ropes Trinitarianism. sent2: there is something such that the fact that either it is a Galilean or it is a melphalan or both is incorrect. sent3: the BB ropes Trinitarianism if there exists something such that that it either is a Galilean or is not a melphalan or both is wrong. sent4: there is something such that it ropes kwela and ropes Trinitarianism. sent5: the fact that that the augite does not rope kwela hold if the fact that the augite does not glare gingersnap but it is a Taurotragus does not hold hold. sent6: the augite does not rope kwela but it is backward. sent7: there is something such that it does not rope kwela. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that either it is a Galilean or it is not a melphalan or both is correct. sent9: something glares gingersnap. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is a Galilean or it is not a melphalan or both is not true. sent11: the dj concocts synecdoche if there exists something such that it does not rope kwela and is backward. sent12: the dj is a pogonip if the BB does rope Trinitarianism. sent13: there is something such that it is a melphalan. sent14: the BB concocts synecdoche. sent15: the augite is backward. sent16: that the augite is a pogonip and is backward is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the BB does rope Trinitarianism.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the dj is a kind of a pogonip.; sent6 -> int3: something does not rope kwela but it is backward.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the dj does concoct synecdoche.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__