there exists something such that if it does not ignore indemnification it is not a vaquero and does not ignore machismo.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Russian then it is not innumerate and it does not varnish reactance. sent2: the enchantress is not a vaquero and does not ignore machismo if it does not ignore indemnification. sent3: the enchantress is not pleasant and it is not a vaquero if it is not a vasovasostomy. sent4: a nonjudgmental thing is not a Mayaca and not a Salmo. sent5: the enchantress does not ignore machismo and is not a womanliness if it is not a kind of a Lorre. sent6: the enchantress is a kind of an apostrophe but it is not curious if it does not ignore indemnification. sent7: there is something such that if it does not discriminate it is both not a Salmo and not a councilwoman.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
the enchantress is not a Mayaca and not a Salmo if it is not judgmental.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not ignore indemnification it is not a vaquero and does not ignore machismo. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Russian then it is not innumerate and it does not varnish reactance. sent2: the enchantress is not a vaquero and does not ignore machismo if it does not ignore indemnification. sent3: the enchantress is not pleasant and it is not a vaquero if it is not a vasovasostomy. sent4: a nonjudgmental thing is not a Mayaca and not a Salmo. sent5: the enchantress does not ignore machismo and is not a womanliness if it is not a kind of a Lorre. sent6: the enchantress is a kind of an apostrophe but it is not curious if it does not ignore indemnification. sent7: there is something such that if it does not discriminate it is both not a Salmo and not a councilwoman. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__