the set does not sigh Theophrastus.
sent1: everything is not a Mimir. sent2: the kennel does not sigh puerpera. sent3: the naboom is not dissuasive. sent4: if the set is not a Mimir that it does not level naboom and does sigh Theophrastus is incorrect. sent5: if the kennel is not dissuasive the fact that it is not sexual and it is a Mimir is wrong. sent6: that either the kennel sighs puerpera or it is sexual or both is incorrect if the naboom is not dissuasive. sent7: if the naboom is not dissuasive the kennel does not sigh puerpera. sent8: if that the kennel does sigh puerpera and/or it is not non-sexual is incorrect the set does not level naboom.
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the kennel either does sigh puerpera or is sexual or both is incorrect.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the set does not level naboom.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the set sighs Theophrastus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the set does not level naboom and sighs Theophrastus.; sent1 -> int4: the set is not a Mimir.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the set does not level naboom and sighs Theophrastus is wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the set does not sigh Theophrastus. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is not a Mimir. sent2: the kennel does not sigh puerpera. sent3: the naboom is not dissuasive. sent4: if the set is not a Mimir that it does not level naboom and does sigh Theophrastus is incorrect. sent5: if the kennel is not dissuasive the fact that it is not sexual and it is a Mimir is wrong. sent6: that either the kennel sighs puerpera or it is sexual or both is incorrect if the naboom is not dissuasive. sent7: if the naboom is not dissuasive the kennel does not sigh puerpera. sent8: if that the kennel does sigh puerpera and/or it is not non-sexual is incorrect the set does not level naboom. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the kennel either does sigh puerpera or is sexual or both is incorrect.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the set does not level naboom.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the set sighs Theophrastus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the set does not level naboom and sighs Theophrastus.; sent1 -> int4: the set is not a Mimir.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the set does not level naboom and sighs Theophrastus is wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__