that the housebreaker does not signalize hold.
sent1: that the ascomycete does signalize and is not a kind of a saltpeter is not right. sent2: the captive is both a headliner and a saltpeter if there exists something such that it does not steer. sent3: the desperate is not a luckiness. sent4: the fact that the samosa is not molecular is true. sent5: something does not signalize if that it is not a saltpeter and it signalize is not right. sent6: there exists something such that it is both not a luckiness and a saltpeter. sent7: the repellent is phylogenetic. sent8: if the ascomycete is not a saltpeter the desperate is not a luckiness. sent9: if that the ascomycete does not steer and/or it is not a headliner is wrong then the housebreaker does not steer. sent10: the samosa is phylogenetic if the repellent steers. sent11: that the samosa steers but it is not molecular is not true if the repellent is salable. sent12: there is something such that it is not a luckiness. sent13: that something is not molecular but it steers is not correct if it is not a luckiness. sent14: if the ascomycete is not a kind of a saltpeter then the desperate is not a kind of a luckiness and it is not a saltpeter. sent15: if the ascomycete is a saltpeter then the samosa does steer. sent16: something is not a saltpeter. sent17: the repellent is a kind of salable thing that is phylogenetic. sent18: the pastry is a headliner if something that is not a luckiness is not a saltpeter. sent19: the housebreaker signalizes if the pastry is a headliner. sent20: if something does not steer then the fact that it is not a saltpeter and it does signalize is wrong. sent21: the desperate is not phylogenetic. sent22: the ascomycete does not steer if there is something such that that it is non-molecular thing that steer is not correct. sent23: there are non-salable things. sent24: there exists something such that it is a luckiness but not a saltpeter.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ascomycete is a saltpeter.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the samosa steers.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the samosa does steer but it is not molecular.; sent17 -> int3: the repellent is salable.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: that the samosa does steer but it is not molecular is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the ascomycete is not a kind of a saltpeter.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the desperate is not a luckiness and it is not a kind of a saltpeter.; int7 -> int8: something is not a luckiness and it is not a saltpeter.; int8 & sent18 -> int9: the pastry is a kind of a headliner.; int9 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the captive is a headliner.
sent13 -> int10: that that the desperate is not molecular and does steer does not hold is right if it is not a luckiness.;
$hypothesis$ = that the housebreaker does not signalize hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the ascomycete does signalize and is not a kind of a saltpeter is not right. sent2: the captive is both a headliner and a saltpeter if there exists something such that it does not steer. sent3: the desperate is not a luckiness. sent4: the fact that the samosa is not molecular is true. sent5: something does not signalize if that it is not a saltpeter and it signalize is not right. sent6: there exists something such that it is both not a luckiness and a saltpeter. sent7: the repellent is phylogenetic. sent8: if the ascomycete is not a saltpeter the desperate is not a luckiness. sent9: if that the ascomycete does not steer and/or it is not a headliner is wrong then the housebreaker does not steer. sent10: the samosa is phylogenetic if the repellent steers. sent11: that the samosa steers but it is not molecular is not true if the repellent is salable. sent12: there is something such that it is not a luckiness. sent13: that something is not molecular but it steers is not correct if it is not a luckiness. sent14: if the ascomycete is not a kind of a saltpeter then the desperate is not a kind of a luckiness and it is not a saltpeter. sent15: if the ascomycete is a saltpeter then the samosa does steer. sent16: something is not a saltpeter. sent17: the repellent is a kind of salable thing that is phylogenetic. sent18: the pastry is a headliner if something that is not a luckiness is not a saltpeter. sent19: the housebreaker signalizes if the pastry is a headliner. sent20: if something does not steer then the fact that it is not a saltpeter and it does signalize is wrong. sent21: the desperate is not phylogenetic. sent22: the ascomycete does not steer if there is something such that that it is non-molecular thing that steer is not correct. sent23: there are non-salable things. sent24: there exists something such that it is a luckiness but not a saltpeter. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ascomycete is a saltpeter.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the samosa steers.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the samosa does steer but it is not molecular.; sent17 -> int3: the repellent is salable.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: that the samosa does steer but it is not molecular is wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the ascomycete is not a kind of a saltpeter.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the desperate is not a luckiness and it is not a kind of a saltpeter.; int7 -> int8: something is not a luckiness and it is not a saltpeter.; int8 & sent18 -> int9: the pastry is a kind of a headliner.; int9 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__