the fact that the sputtering socialism does not occur and the inappropriateness does not occur does not hold if the fragmenting letter happens.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the sputtering socialism does not occur and the inappropriateness does not occur is not false is not right if the sputtering Crotalidae does not occur. sent2: that the fragmenting waterbuck does not occur yields that both the fragmenting supposition and the sputtering folk occurs. sent3: the evil prevents the non-nacreousness. sent4: that the nacreousness occurs brings about that the picketing happens but the inappropriateness does not occur. sent5: the sputtering socialism does not occur if the inappropriateness does not occur. sent6: the foraging does not occur but the defiance occurs if the circumstance does not occur. sent7: if the foraging does not occur the evilness happens and the sputtering single-mindedness occurs. sent8: that the circumstance does not occur is caused by that the circumstance does not occur and/or that the levanter does not occur. sent9: the circumstance does not occur or the levanter does not occur or both. sent10: the sputtering folk and the fragmenting waterbuck happens. sent11: that both the sputtering folk and the sputtering Crotalidae happens prevents that the fragmenting letter occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fragmenting letter occurs.; sent10 -> int1: the sputtering folk occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sputtering Crotalidae occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sputtering folk and the sputtering Crotalidae happens.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the fragmenting letter does not occur hold.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sputtering Crotalidae does not occur.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the sputtering socialism does not occur and the inappropriateness does not occur is not true.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fragmenting supposition occurs.
sent8 & sent9 -> int7: the circumstance does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: not the foraging but the defiance happens.; int8 -> int9: the foraging does not occur.; sent7 & int9 -> int10: both the evil and the sputtering single-mindedness happens.; int10 -> int11: the evilness occurs.; sent3 & int11 -> int12: the nacreousness occurs.; sent4 & int12 -> int13: the picket but not the inappropriateness occurs.; int13 -> int14: the inappropriateness does not occur.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the sputtering socialism does not occur hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sputtering socialism does not occur and the inappropriateness does not occur does not hold if the fragmenting letter happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the sputtering socialism does not occur and the inappropriateness does not occur is not false is not right if the sputtering Crotalidae does not occur. sent2: that the fragmenting waterbuck does not occur yields that both the fragmenting supposition and the sputtering folk occurs. sent3: the evil prevents the non-nacreousness. sent4: that the nacreousness occurs brings about that the picketing happens but the inappropriateness does not occur. sent5: the sputtering socialism does not occur if the inappropriateness does not occur. sent6: the foraging does not occur but the defiance occurs if the circumstance does not occur. sent7: if the foraging does not occur the evilness happens and the sputtering single-mindedness occurs. sent8: that the circumstance does not occur is caused by that the circumstance does not occur and/or that the levanter does not occur. sent9: the circumstance does not occur or the levanter does not occur or both. sent10: the sputtering folk and the fragmenting waterbuck happens. sent11: that both the sputtering folk and the sputtering Crotalidae happens prevents that the fragmenting letter occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fragmenting letter occurs.; sent10 -> int1: the sputtering folk occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sputtering Crotalidae occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sputtering folk and the sputtering Crotalidae happens.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the fragmenting letter does not occur hold.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sputtering Crotalidae does not occur.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the sputtering socialism does not occur and the inappropriateness does not occur is not true.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__