the fact that if the tulip is Gilbertian then the casuist does not converge but it is a master does not hold.
sent1: the tulip stabs variability if the colors gilds quack. sent2: if the tulip does master then the casuist does converge. sent3: the casuist is a master that is an exporter if there exists something such that it does stab woodgrain. sent4: the daylight is Gilbertian if the colors does not gild quack. sent5: if that something is a Eddy and does not gild tomtit is incorrect then the fact that that it is not a kind of a neurobiologist does not hold is wrong. sent6: the colors gilds quack. sent7: the absinthe does stab woodgrain. sent8: if something that does not stab variability does not converge then the colors does not gild quack. sent9: if the fact that the casuist does not stab woodgrain and is an exporter is wrong the tulip does master. sent10: the fact that the casuist does not converge is right if the tulip is Gilbertian and it does stab variability. sent11: The quack gilds colors. sent12: the fact that the casuist does not stab woodgrain and is an exporter is not correct if the absinthe is not a kind of a neurobiologist. sent13: the colors is not a master. sent14: The woodgrain does stab absinthe. sent15: the fact that something gilds quack is right. sent16: the fact that something is a Eddy and does not gild tomtit is not correct if it does not gild deathwatch.
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the tulip stabs variability.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tulip is Gilbertian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tulip is not non-Gilbertian and stabs variability.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the casuist does not converge.; sent7 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it stabs woodgrain is true.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the casuist is a master and is an exporter.; int5 -> int6: the casuist is a master.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the casuist does not converge but it is a master.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the daylight is Gilbertian.
sent5 -> int8: the absinthe is not a kind of a neurobiologist if that it is a Eddy and does not gild tomtit is not correct.; sent16 -> int9: if the absinthe does not gild deathwatch the fact that it is a Eddy and does not gild tomtit is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the tulip is Gilbertian then the casuist does not converge but it is a master does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the tulip stabs variability if the colors gilds quack. sent2: if the tulip does master then the casuist does converge. sent3: the casuist is a master that is an exporter if there exists something such that it does stab woodgrain. sent4: the daylight is Gilbertian if the colors does not gild quack. sent5: if that something is a Eddy and does not gild tomtit is incorrect then the fact that that it is not a kind of a neurobiologist does not hold is wrong. sent6: the colors gilds quack. sent7: the absinthe does stab woodgrain. sent8: if something that does not stab variability does not converge then the colors does not gild quack. sent9: if the fact that the casuist does not stab woodgrain and is an exporter is wrong the tulip does master. sent10: the fact that the casuist does not converge is right if the tulip is Gilbertian and it does stab variability. sent11: The quack gilds colors. sent12: the fact that the casuist does not stab woodgrain and is an exporter is not correct if the absinthe is not a kind of a neurobiologist. sent13: the colors is not a master. sent14: The woodgrain does stab absinthe. sent15: the fact that something gilds quack is right. sent16: the fact that something is a Eddy and does not gild tomtit is not correct if it does not gild deathwatch. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the tulip stabs variability.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tulip is Gilbertian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tulip is not non-Gilbertian and stabs variability.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the casuist does not converge.; sent7 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it stabs woodgrain is true.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the casuist is a master and is an exporter.; int5 -> int6: the casuist is a master.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the casuist does not converge but it is a master.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__