the provocativeness does not occur.
sent1: that the sustainableness does not occur and the neonatalness occurs does not hold if the affinedness occurs. sent2: if the modestness does not occur that the indefeasibleness but not the articulating test happens does not hold. sent3: the non-neonatalness and the non-sustainableness happens if the hydrographicness happens. sent4: the sustainableness results in the non-affinedness. sent5: if the hydrographicness does not occur and the articulating test does not occur then the syllogizing Sanchez happens. sent6: if the provocativeness happens then the fact that the affinedness happens hold. sent7: if the hydrographicness does not occur then the non-sustainableness and the neonatalness occurs. sent8: if that the syllogizing enterostomy but not the inauguration occurs is incorrect the modestness does not occur. sent9: the hydrographicness does not occur. sent10: if that the syllogizing half-caste does not occur and the syllogizing adversity does not occur is not correct then the syllogizing half-caste happens. sent11: if the fact that the indefeasibleness happens and the articulating test does not occur is not right the hydrographicness happens. sent12: if the syllogizing half-caste happens that the syllogizing enterostomy but not the inauguration happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the provocativeness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the affinedness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that both the non-sustainableness and the neonatalness happens is wrong.; sent7 & sent9 -> int3: the sustainableness does not occur but the neonatalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the provocativeness occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = the provocativeness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sustainableness does not occur and the neonatalness occurs does not hold if the affinedness occurs. sent2: if the modestness does not occur that the indefeasibleness but not the articulating test happens does not hold. sent3: the non-neonatalness and the non-sustainableness happens if the hydrographicness happens. sent4: the sustainableness results in the non-affinedness. sent5: if the hydrographicness does not occur and the articulating test does not occur then the syllogizing Sanchez happens. sent6: if the provocativeness happens then the fact that the affinedness happens hold. sent7: if the hydrographicness does not occur then the non-sustainableness and the neonatalness occurs. sent8: if that the syllogizing enterostomy but not the inauguration occurs is incorrect the modestness does not occur. sent9: the hydrographicness does not occur. sent10: if that the syllogizing half-caste does not occur and the syllogizing adversity does not occur is not correct then the syllogizing half-caste happens. sent11: if the fact that the indefeasibleness happens and the articulating test does not occur is not right the hydrographicness happens. sent12: if the syllogizing half-caste happens that the syllogizing enterostomy but not the inauguration happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the provocativeness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the affinedness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that both the non-sustainableness and the neonatalness happens is wrong.; sent7 & sent9 -> int3: the sustainableness does not occur but the neonatalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__