the dilutant is both a gastrostomy and logistic.
sent1: if something does prang it is logistic. sent2: if the fact that the dilutant does not invoke precipitant is not correct then it is logistic. sent3: there exists something such that it gardens. sent4: the dilutant is not a anticholinesterase. sent5: the fact that something is a gastrostomy and it is logistic is not true if it is not a gardening. sent6: if there is something such that it invokes precipitant then the dilutant is a Principe. sent7: if the dilutant is not a anticholinesterase it does invoke precipitant and/or it prangs. sent8: if there exists something such that it gardens the dilutant cloisters and it is a kind of a gastrostomy. sent9: if the dilutant is not a prang it either is spiritless or is dependable or both.
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the dilutant does cloister and it is a gastrostomy.; int1 -> int2: the dilutant is a gastrostomy.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: that the dilutant either invokes precipitant or is a prang or both is right.; sent1 -> int4: if the dilutant is a prang it is not non-logistic.; int3 & sent2 & int4 -> int5: the dilutant is logistic.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dilutant is a gastrostomy and is logistic does not hold.
sent5 -> int6: the fact that the dilutant is a gastrostomy and is logistic does not hold if it is not a gardening.;
$hypothesis$ = the dilutant is both a gastrostomy and logistic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does prang it is logistic. sent2: if the fact that the dilutant does not invoke precipitant is not correct then it is logistic. sent3: there exists something such that it gardens. sent4: the dilutant is not a anticholinesterase. sent5: the fact that something is a gastrostomy and it is logistic is not true if it is not a gardening. sent6: if there is something such that it invokes precipitant then the dilutant is a Principe. sent7: if the dilutant is not a anticholinesterase it does invoke precipitant and/or it prangs. sent8: if there exists something such that it gardens the dilutant cloisters and it is a kind of a gastrostomy. sent9: if the dilutant is not a prang it either is spiritless or is dependable or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the dilutant does cloister and it is a gastrostomy.; int1 -> int2: the dilutant is a gastrostomy.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: that the dilutant either invokes precipitant or is a prang or both is right.; sent1 -> int4: if the dilutant is a prang it is not non-logistic.; int3 & sent2 & int4 -> int5: the dilutant is logistic.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__