the usurer hinges.
sent1: if the fact that something is not uninucleate and it does not strengthen elm is not correct it strengthens executioner. sent2: the fact that a familiar does not strengthen elm is not incorrect. sent3: if the codetalker does not strengthen elm then that the usurer is non-uninucleate thing that does not strengthen elm is not right. sent4: the fact that the codetalker is familiar but it is not a kind of a Clark if the vestal is not a kind of a familiar hold. sent5: the vestal is comatose but it is not a kind of a familiar if the magician is a digitigrade. sent6: if something does strengthen executioner then that it is a Stylomecon and not immunochemical is not incorrect. sent7: something strengthens executioner if the fact that it is uninucleate is not wrong. sent8: the magician is a digitigrade.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the vestal is comatose but it is not a kind of a familiar.; int1 -> int2: the vestal is not a familiar.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the codetalker is a kind of a familiar and is not a kind of a Clark is right.; int3 -> int4: the codetalker is a kind of a familiar.; sent2 -> int5: if the codetalker is a familiar then that it does not strengthen elm is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the codetalker does not strengthen elm.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the usurer is not uninucleate and does not strengthen elm does not hold.; sent1 -> int8: the usurer does strengthen executioner if the fact that it is not uninucleate and does not strengthen elm is not right.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the usurer strengthens executioner.; sent6 -> int10: if the usurer does strengthen executioner then it is a Stylomecon and it is not immunochemical.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the usurer is a Stylomecon but not immunochemical.;
$hypothesis$ = the usurer hinges. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not uninucleate and it does not strengthen elm is not correct it strengthens executioner. sent2: the fact that a familiar does not strengthen elm is not incorrect. sent3: if the codetalker does not strengthen elm then that the usurer is non-uninucleate thing that does not strengthen elm is not right. sent4: the fact that the codetalker is familiar but it is not a kind of a Clark if the vestal is not a kind of a familiar hold. sent5: the vestal is comatose but it is not a kind of a familiar if the magician is a digitigrade. sent6: if something does strengthen executioner then that it is a Stylomecon and not immunochemical is not incorrect. sent7: something strengthens executioner if the fact that it is uninucleate is not wrong. sent8: the magician is a digitigrade. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the vestal is comatose but it is not a kind of a familiar.; int1 -> int2: the vestal is not a familiar.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the codetalker is a kind of a familiar and is not a kind of a Clark is right.; int3 -> int4: the codetalker is a kind of a familiar.; sent2 -> int5: if the codetalker is a familiar then that it does not strengthen elm is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the codetalker does not strengthen elm.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the usurer is not uninucleate and does not strengthen elm does not hold.; sent1 -> int8: the usurer does strengthen executioner if the fact that it is not uninucleate and does not strengthen elm is not right.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the usurer strengthens executioner.; sent6 -> int10: if the usurer does strengthen executioner then it is a Stylomecon and it is not immunochemical.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the usurer is a Stylomecon but not immunochemical.; __UNKNOWN__