the asserter does not panel.
sent1: if that the ectoproct does heap Lepus is right the asserter is a panel. sent2: the monkshood is a kind of a panel and/or criticizes eluate if there exists something such that it is aphaeretic. sent3: the coracle is aphaeretic and/or it is a kind of a sloop if there is something such that it heaps depth. sent4: the ectoproct does heap Lepus if the fact that the coracle is a sloop is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that it is a sloop. sent6: if the coracle is aphaeretic then that the ectoproct does heap Lepus is correct. sent7: if there exists something such that it heaps deserter then that the monkshood is not a kimberlite and does criticize eluate is not correct. sent8: the ectoproct criticizes eluate. sent9: something is a fare-stage if that it is not a kind of a kimberlite and does criticize eluate does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that that it does heap deserter is true. sent11: that the monkshood is a kind of a kimberlite and it criticizes eluate is not right. sent12: if something is a kind of a fare-stage then it heaps depth.
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: that the monkshood is not a kimberlite but it criticizes eluate is false.; sent9 -> int2: if the fact that the monkshood is not a kimberlite and criticizes eluate is not true it is a kind of a fare-stage.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the monkshood is a fare-stage.; sent12 -> int4: if the monkshood is a fare-stage then it heaps depth.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the monkshood does heap depth.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it heaps depth.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: either the coracle is aphaeretic or it is a sloop or both.; int7 & sent6 & sent4 -> int8: the ectoproct does heap Lepus.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the asserter does not panel. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the ectoproct does heap Lepus is right the asserter is a panel. sent2: the monkshood is a kind of a panel and/or criticizes eluate if there exists something such that it is aphaeretic. sent3: the coracle is aphaeretic and/or it is a kind of a sloop if there is something such that it heaps depth. sent4: the ectoproct does heap Lepus if the fact that the coracle is a sloop is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that it is a sloop. sent6: if the coracle is aphaeretic then that the ectoproct does heap Lepus is correct. sent7: if there exists something such that it heaps deserter then that the monkshood is not a kimberlite and does criticize eluate is not correct. sent8: the ectoproct criticizes eluate. sent9: something is a fare-stage if that it is not a kind of a kimberlite and does criticize eluate does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that that it does heap deserter is true. sent11: that the monkshood is a kind of a kimberlite and it criticizes eluate is not right. sent12: if something is a kind of a fare-stage then it heaps depth. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent7 -> int1: that the monkshood is not a kimberlite but it criticizes eluate is false.; sent9 -> int2: if the fact that the monkshood is not a kimberlite and criticizes eluate is not true it is a kind of a fare-stage.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the monkshood is a fare-stage.; sent12 -> int4: if the monkshood is a fare-stage then it heaps depth.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the monkshood does heap depth.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it heaps depth.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: either the coracle is aphaeretic or it is a sloop or both.; int7 & sent6 & sent4 -> int8: the ectoproct does heap Lepus.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__