the phenomenalness and the former happens.
sent1: the bluff does not occur. sent2: that the corruption does not occur causes that the formerness happens. sent3: the fact that the Assamese does not occur and the splenectomy happens does not hold. sent4: the impeding emery occurs. sent5: the fact that the Assamese happens and the splenectomy does not occur is false. sent6: the grinding occurs. sent7: the gentrification happens. sent8: that the orgy does not occur but the coif happens triggers that the synonymousness occurs. sent9: that the orgy but not the coif happens prevents the non-synonymousness. sent10: if both the buzz and the synonymousness occurs then the corruption does not occur. sent11: the buzzing happens if the fact that the Assameseness does not occur and the splenectomy does not occur does not hold. sent12: if the valency does not occur that the coarctation occurs hold. sent13: that the phenomenalness happens and the former happens is not right if the buzz does not occur. sent14: that the Assamese does not occur and the splenectomy does not occur prevents that the bluff does not occur. sent15: the bluff happens if the Assameseness but not the splenectomy occurs. sent16: the orgy does not occur and the coif does not occur if the impeding emery occurs. sent17: if the orgy does not occur and the coif does not occur then the synonymousness happens. sent18: the fact that the bluff occurs is not incorrect if the non-Assameseness and the splenectomy happens. sent19: if that both the orgy and the grinding occurs is wrong that the orgy does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Assamese does not occur and the splenectomy does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the bluff occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Assameseness does not occur and the splenectomy does not occur is not correct.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the buzzing happens.; sent16 & sent4 -> int5: the orgy does not occur and the coif does not occur.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the synonymousness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the buzz happens and the synonymousness occurs.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the corruption does not occur is correct.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the former occurs.;
the fact that that the phenomenalness happens and the former occurs is not true is true.
$hypothesis$ = the phenomenalness and the former happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the bluff does not occur. sent2: that the corruption does not occur causes that the formerness happens. sent3: the fact that the Assamese does not occur and the splenectomy happens does not hold. sent4: the impeding emery occurs. sent5: the fact that the Assamese happens and the splenectomy does not occur is false. sent6: the grinding occurs. sent7: the gentrification happens. sent8: that the orgy does not occur but the coif happens triggers that the synonymousness occurs. sent9: that the orgy but not the coif happens prevents the non-synonymousness. sent10: if both the buzz and the synonymousness occurs then the corruption does not occur. sent11: the buzzing happens if the fact that the Assameseness does not occur and the splenectomy does not occur does not hold. sent12: if the valency does not occur that the coarctation occurs hold. sent13: that the phenomenalness happens and the former happens is not right if the buzz does not occur. sent14: that the Assamese does not occur and the splenectomy does not occur prevents that the bluff does not occur. sent15: the bluff happens if the Assameseness but not the splenectomy occurs. sent16: the orgy does not occur and the coif does not occur if the impeding emery occurs. sent17: if the orgy does not occur and the coif does not occur then the synonymousness happens. sent18: the fact that the bluff occurs is not incorrect if the non-Assameseness and the splenectomy happens. sent19: if that both the orgy and the grinding occurs is wrong that the orgy does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Assamese does not occur and the splenectomy does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the bluff occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Assameseness does not occur and the splenectomy does not occur is not correct.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the buzzing happens.; sent16 & sent4 -> int5: the orgy does not occur and the coif does not occur.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the synonymousness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the buzz happens and the synonymousness occurs.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the corruption does not occur is correct.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the former occurs.; __UNKNOWN__