the fact that the coleus is not a punkie and it does not look plunk is not right.
sent1: that something is a court and/or it does not look plunk is not false. sent2: if something does not look plunk and/or it is not a Tolstoy then the coleus does not look plunk. sent3: the medicine is a kind of facultative thing that is not a kind of a hindquarter. sent4: that the checkers is a kind of a unassertiveness and it interpolates Enki is false. sent5: the checkers is not a kind of a consenting if that it is a kind of a unassertiveness that does interpolate Enki is not correct. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it courts and it is a MANPAD does not hold the medicine is not atheistic. sent7: there is something such that either it does not look plunk or it is not a Tolstoy or both. sent8: the coleus is not a court if something that is facultative is not a hindquarter. sent9: if the valley is a flue it is a kind of non-spondaic thing that is not a kind of an overhang. sent10: there is something such that it is a kind of a hindquarter and does court. sent11: if something that is non-spondaic is not an overhang it is not facultative. sent12: that that the hammertoe is a kind of a court that is a MANPAD does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it is a hindquarter is not wrong is right. sent13: the fact that the vegetable looks polyelectrolyte and does not permit hammertoe does not hold. sent14: the arsenopyrite is a Tolstoy and a hindquarter if the valley is not facultative. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it does look polyelectrolyte and it does not permit hammertoe is not right the coleus is not atheistic. sent16: the coleus is not a kind of a punkie if it is not a kind of a MANPAD and it does not court. sent17: if the checkers is not a consenting the valley is a flue that fidgets kinsman. sent18: if the medicine courts then it is a MANPAD. sent19: something is not a kind of a hindquarter. sent20: something is not a MANPAD if it is not atheistic.
sent13 -> int1: there is something such that that it does look polyelectrolyte and does not permit hammertoe is wrong.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the coleus is not atheistic.; sent20 -> int3: if the coleus is not atheistic it is not a MANPAD.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the coleus is not a MANPAD.; sent3 -> int5: something is facultative thing that is not a hindquarter.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the coleus does not court.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the coleus is not a MANPAD and not a court.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the coleus is not a punkie.; sent7 & sent2 -> int9: the coleus does not look plunk.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that that it is handmade and it does not interpolate Enki is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the coleus is not a punkie and it does not look plunk is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a court and/or it does not look plunk is not false. sent2: if something does not look plunk and/or it is not a Tolstoy then the coleus does not look plunk. sent3: the medicine is a kind of facultative thing that is not a kind of a hindquarter. sent4: that the checkers is a kind of a unassertiveness and it interpolates Enki is false. sent5: the checkers is not a kind of a consenting if that it is a kind of a unassertiveness that does interpolate Enki is not correct. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it courts and it is a MANPAD does not hold the medicine is not atheistic. sent7: there is something such that either it does not look plunk or it is not a Tolstoy or both. sent8: the coleus is not a court if something that is facultative is not a hindquarter. sent9: if the valley is a flue it is a kind of non-spondaic thing that is not a kind of an overhang. sent10: there is something such that it is a kind of a hindquarter and does court. sent11: if something that is non-spondaic is not an overhang it is not facultative. sent12: that that the hammertoe is a kind of a court that is a MANPAD does not hold if there is something such that the fact that it is a hindquarter is not wrong is right. sent13: the fact that the vegetable looks polyelectrolyte and does not permit hammertoe does not hold. sent14: the arsenopyrite is a Tolstoy and a hindquarter if the valley is not facultative. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it does look polyelectrolyte and it does not permit hammertoe is not right the coleus is not atheistic. sent16: the coleus is not a kind of a punkie if it is not a kind of a MANPAD and it does not court. sent17: if the checkers is not a consenting the valley is a flue that fidgets kinsman. sent18: if the medicine courts then it is a MANPAD. sent19: something is not a kind of a hindquarter. sent20: something is not a MANPAD if it is not atheistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: there is something such that that it does look polyelectrolyte and does not permit hammertoe is wrong.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the coleus is not atheistic.; sent20 -> int3: if the coleus is not atheistic it is not a MANPAD.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the coleus is not a MANPAD.; sent3 -> int5: something is facultative thing that is not a hindquarter.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the coleus does not court.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the coleus is not a MANPAD and not a court.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the coleus is not a punkie.; sent7 & sent2 -> int9: the coleus does not look plunk.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__