the fact that the Jansenist is not an employee and is a kind of a correspondence is not correct.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it gains and is a sunray is not correct then the aspirin is a kind of a polls. sent2: the circle is non-argillaceous if the fact that the footwear is Epicurean but it does not descry induction is false. sent3: if that the Jansenist is argillaceous but it is not an employee does not hold the footwear does not descry induction. sent4: the Jansenist is not an employee. sent5: if the circle is a sunray then it does gain. sent6: if the footwear is not Epicurean but it is argillaceous the structure is Epicurean. sent7: if the Jansenist is an employee and a correspondence then the structure is not a Halifax. sent8: if the structure is not a Halifax then that the footwear is Epicurean and it descries induction is not true. sent9: there is something such that it gains and is a sunray. sent10: the aspirin is not a kind of a polls. sent11: if the circle is not argillaceous that it is a kind of a gain and is a kind of a sunray is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the Jansenist is a kind of an employee and it is a correspondence does not hold. sent13: that the footwear is Epicurean but it does not descry induction does not hold if the structure is not a Halifax. sent14: if something is Epicurean then it does not descry induction and it is a Halifax.
that the Jansenist is not an employee but it is a kind of a correspondence is right.
sent14 -> int1: the structure does not descry induction and is a Halifax if it is Epicurean.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Jansenist is not an employee and is a kind of a correspondence is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it gains and is a sunray is not correct then the aspirin is a kind of a polls. sent2: the circle is non-argillaceous if the fact that the footwear is Epicurean but it does not descry induction is false. sent3: if that the Jansenist is argillaceous but it is not an employee does not hold the footwear does not descry induction. sent4: the Jansenist is not an employee. sent5: if the circle is a sunray then it does gain. sent6: if the footwear is not Epicurean but it is argillaceous the structure is Epicurean. sent7: if the Jansenist is an employee and a correspondence then the structure is not a Halifax. sent8: if the structure is not a Halifax then that the footwear is Epicurean and it descries induction is not true. sent9: there is something such that it gains and is a sunray. sent10: the aspirin is not a kind of a polls. sent11: if the circle is not argillaceous that it is a kind of a gain and is a kind of a sunray is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the Jansenist is a kind of an employee and it is a correspondence does not hold. sent13: that the footwear is Epicurean but it does not descry induction does not hold if the structure is not a Halifax. sent14: if something is Epicurean then it does not descry induction and it is a Halifax. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__