not the unchasteness but the fowling Zweig happens.
sent1: that the fowling Zweig occurs and the fowling hooks occurs is caused by that the real-timeness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the unchasteness does not occur is not wrong if either the game happens or the mercilessness occurs or both. sent3: the non-real-timeness and the cytologicalness occurs. sent4: the immunotherapy occurs. sent5: if the pigmenting bonemeal occurs then the mercilessness occurs. sent6: the effortfulness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the ascertaining caudex occurs and the immunotherapy does not occur is incorrect then the pigmenting bonemeal occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ascertaining caudex occurs and the immunotherapy does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the immunotherapy does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ascertaining caudex occurs and the immunotherapy does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the pigmenting bonemeal occurs.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the mercilessness happens.; int5 -> int6: the game occurs or the mercilessness occurs or both.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: that the unchasteness does not occur is right.; sent3 -> int8: the real-timeness does not occur.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: both the fowling Zweig and the fowling hooks occurs.; int9 -> int10: the fowling Zweig happens.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = not the unchasteness but the fowling Zweig happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fowling Zweig occurs and the fowling hooks occurs is caused by that the real-timeness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the unchasteness does not occur is not wrong if either the game happens or the mercilessness occurs or both. sent3: the non-real-timeness and the cytologicalness occurs. sent4: the immunotherapy occurs. sent5: if the pigmenting bonemeal occurs then the mercilessness occurs. sent6: the effortfulness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the ascertaining caudex occurs and the immunotherapy does not occur is incorrect then the pigmenting bonemeal occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ascertaining caudex occurs and the immunotherapy does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the immunotherapy does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the ascertaining caudex occurs and the immunotherapy does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the pigmenting bonemeal occurs.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the mercilessness happens.; int5 -> int6: the game occurs or the mercilessness occurs or both.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: that the unchasteness does not occur is right.; sent3 -> int8: the real-timeness does not occur.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: both the fowling Zweig and the fowling hooks occurs.; int9 -> int10: the fowling Zweig happens.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__