the peacock-throne does not clank counterintelligence and does not ammoniate lightness.
sent1: there exists something such that it does modernize. sent2: if something is not a ketohexose then that the photocoagulator is a ketohexose and is not rustless is not correct. sent3: the annuitant is not a ketohexose if that the pedodontist is not nonadhesive and not amalgamative is not true. sent4: the commandant does clank remuda or is perianal or both. sent5: the peacock-throne is both not amalgamative and not a hole if it does not clank remuda. sent6: if that the annuitant is nonadhesive and clanks remuda is incorrect it is not a ketohexose. sent7: if there is something such that it modernizes then that the flatbed is a mischief that clanks gummed is not correct. sent8: the hilltop does hole and/or it is not non-amalgamative if the flatbed does not clank remuda. sent9: something does not clank Coloradan and is not unreverberant if it is rustless. sent10: if the peacock-throne is a kind of a ketohexose then that the commandant is not perianal and it is not rustless is false. sent11: the pedodontist clanks gummed and does clank remuda. sent12: if that the commandant is not perianal and is not rustless does not hold the annuitant is nonadhesive. sent13: if the hilltop is nonadhesive that the annuitant does not hole and it is not amalgamative is not correct. sent14: if something is nonadhesive but it is not perianal then it is not a ketohexose. sent15: the peacock-throne is nonadhesive and is not perianal if it is not amalgamative. sent16: the commandant is non-perianal if the peacock-throne is non-perianal. sent17: if that something is a kind of a mischief that clanks gummed does not hold then that it does not clank remuda hold. sent18: if the hilltop is a hole and/or it is amalgamative then the fact that the pedodontist is not amalgamative hold. sent19: something is rustless if the fact that it is a ketohexose and not rustless does not hold. sent20: the pedodontist is amalgamative if the fact that the annuitant is not nonadhesive does not hold. sent21: if the pedodontist does clank remuda then it is a hole. sent22: that the fact that the pedodontist is both not nonadhesive and not amalgamative is incorrect is correct if it does hole. sent23: the fact that the peacock-throne is a kind of the ketohexose if that the peacock-throne does not clank counterintelligence and it does not ammoniate lightness is false is not incorrect. sent24: the flatbed is rustless and/or it clanks gummed. sent25: that the flatbed is a kind of a ketohexose but it does not clank remuda does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the peacock-throne does not clank counterintelligence and it does not ammoniate lightness is incorrect.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the peacock-throne is a ketohexose.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the commandant is not perianal and it is not rustless is not true.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the annuitant is nonadhesive.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the pedodontist is amalgamative.; sent17 -> int5: if the fact that the flatbed is a mischief and it clanks gummed is incorrect then it does not clank remuda.; sent1 & sent7 -> int6: that the flatbed is a kind of a mischief that clanks gummed is wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the flatbed does not clank remuda.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the hilltop is either a hole or amalgamative or both.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the pedodontist is not amalgamative.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the photocoagulator does not clank Coloradan and it is not unreverberant.
sent9 -> int11: if the photocoagulator is rustless it does not clank Coloradan and is not unreverberant.; sent19 -> int12: if the fact that the photocoagulator is a ketohexose and is rusted is incorrect it is rusted.; sent14 -> int13: the fact that the peacock-throne is not a ketohexose hold if it is nonadhesive and it is not perianal.;
$hypothesis$ = the peacock-throne does not clank counterintelligence and does not ammoniate lightness. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does modernize. sent2: if something is not a ketohexose then that the photocoagulator is a ketohexose and is not rustless is not correct. sent3: the annuitant is not a ketohexose if that the pedodontist is not nonadhesive and not amalgamative is not true. sent4: the commandant does clank remuda or is perianal or both. sent5: the peacock-throne is both not amalgamative and not a hole if it does not clank remuda. sent6: if that the annuitant is nonadhesive and clanks remuda is incorrect it is not a ketohexose. sent7: if there is something such that it modernizes then that the flatbed is a mischief that clanks gummed is not correct. sent8: the hilltop does hole and/or it is not non-amalgamative if the flatbed does not clank remuda. sent9: something does not clank Coloradan and is not unreverberant if it is rustless. sent10: if the peacock-throne is a kind of a ketohexose then that the commandant is not perianal and it is not rustless is false. sent11: the pedodontist clanks gummed and does clank remuda. sent12: if that the commandant is not perianal and is not rustless does not hold the annuitant is nonadhesive. sent13: if the hilltop is nonadhesive that the annuitant does not hole and it is not amalgamative is not correct. sent14: if something is nonadhesive but it is not perianal then it is not a ketohexose. sent15: the peacock-throne is nonadhesive and is not perianal if it is not amalgamative. sent16: the commandant is non-perianal if the peacock-throne is non-perianal. sent17: if that something is a kind of a mischief that clanks gummed does not hold then that it does not clank remuda hold. sent18: if the hilltop is a hole and/or it is amalgamative then the fact that the pedodontist is not amalgamative hold. sent19: something is rustless if the fact that it is a ketohexose and not rustless does not hold. sent20: the pedodontist is amalgamative if the fact that the annuitant is not nonadhesive does not hold. sent21: if the pedodontist does clank remuda then it is a hole. sent22: that the fact that the pedodontist is both not nonadhesive and not amalgamative is incorrect is correct if it does hole. sent23: the fact that the peacock-throne is a kind of the ketohexose if that the peacock-throne does not clank counterintelligence and it does not ammoniate lightness is false is not incorrect. sent24: the flatbed is rustless and/or it clanks gummed. sent25: that the flatbed is a kind of a ketohexose but it does not clank remuda does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the peacock-throne does not clank counterintelligence and it does not ammoniate lightness is incorrect.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the peacock-throne is a ketohexose.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the commandant is not perianal and it is not rustless is not true.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the annuitant is nonadhesive.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the pedodontist is amalgamative.; sent17 -> int5: if the fact that the flatbed is a mischief and it clanks gummed is incorrect then it does not clank remuda.; sent1 & sent7 -> int6: that the flatbed is a kind of a mischief that clanks gummed is wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the flatbed does not clank remuda.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the hilltop is either a hole or amalgamative or both.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the pedodontist is not amalgamative.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__