the fact that there exists something such that it is nontranslational and is a swagman does not hold.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not immunotherapeutic and a divvy does not hold the nondevelopment is nontranslational. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a swagman and it is photosynthetic is wrong. sent3: there is something such that it is a swagman. sent4: the nondevelopment is a kind of a swagman and it is photosynthetic. sent5: that the nondevelopment is photosynthetic is not false. sent6: there is something such that it is nontranslational. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is immunotherapeutic and it is a divvy does not hold. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not a divvy hold the nondevelopment is nontranslational. sent9: something is a swagman and is nontranslational if it is not photosynthetic. sent10: something is not immunotherapeutic but it is a kind of a divvy. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not immunotherapeutic and it is a divvy is not right. sent12: the fact that the seeker is a versicle is right if there exists something such that that it is both not a divvy and a Jansenist is false.
sent4 -> int1: the nondevelopment is a swagman.; sent11 & sent1 -> int2: the nondevelopment is nontranslational.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nondevelopment is a kind of nontranslational a swagman.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the sweetbread is nontranslational and a hideousness.
sent9 -> int4: if the sweetbread is not photosynthetic it is a swagman that is nontranslational.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is nontranslational and is a swagman does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not immunotherapeutic and a divvy does not hold the nondevelopment is nontranslational. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not a swagman and it is photosynthetic is wrong. sent3: there is something such that it is a swagman. sent4: the nondevelopment is a kind of a swagman and it is photosynthetic. sent5: that the nondevelopment is photosynthetic is not false. sent6: there is something such that it is nontranslational. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is immunotherapeutic and it is a divvy does not hold. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not a divvy hold the nondevelopment is nontranslational. sent9: something is a swagman and is nontranslational if it is not photosynthetic. sent10: something is not immunotherapeutic but it is a kind of a divvy. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not immunotherapeutic and it is a divvy is not right. sent12: the fact that the seeker is a versicle is right if there exists something such that that it is both not a divvy and a Jansenist is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the nondevelopment is a swagman.; sent11 & sent1 -> int2: the nondevelopment is nontranslational.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nondevelopment is a kind of nontranslational a swagman.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__