that the tearing occurs is right.
sent1: the fact that the ordering does not occur is true. sent2: the five-hitter does not occur if both the regarding excise and the decantation happens. sent3: the fact that the antigenicness does not occur and the beating does not occur is not right if the overbalancing does not occur. sent4: if the approaching steenbok does not occur the subsidization and the mingling occurs. sent5: the trailing does not occur. sent6: the conditions does not occur. sent7: that the whammy does not occur results in that not the approaching Nyala but the vanishing happens. sent8: the whammy does not occur if the freeze-drying soutane does not occur and the bronchialness does not occur. sent9: if the vanishing does not occur that that the ordering does not occur and the expostulation does not occur is not correct is not incorrect. sent10: the solfege occurs. sent11: if that the tearing and the vanishing occurs is incorrect then the tearing does not occur. sent12: the tear occurs if the freeze-drying soutane does not occur. sent13: if the trailing does not occur then the whammy and the bronchialness happens. sent14: the minorsness does not occur and the spectacular does not occur. sent15: that the sporadicness occurs is brought about by that the regarding sigh does not occur. sent16: the affairs does not occur. sent17: if the whammy does not occur then that the tearing and the vanishing occurs is false. sent18: the expostulation does not occur. sent19: that the goading does not occur triggers that the hieroglyphicness happens. sent20: the scouring does not occur and the heterosexualness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vanishing does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ordering does not occur and the expostulation does not occur is wrong.; sent1 & sent18 -> int2: the ordering does not occur and the expostulation does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the vanishing occurs.; sent13 & sent5 -> int5: both the whammy and the bronchialness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the whammy happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the whammy and the vanishing occurs.;
the tear does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the tearing occurs is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ordering does not occur is true. sent2: the five-hitter does not occur if both the regarding excise and the decantation happens. sent3: the fact that the antigenicness does not occur and the beating does not occur is not right if the overbalancing does not occur. sent4: if the approaching steenbok does not occur the subsidization and the mingling occurs. sent5: the trailing does not occur. sent6: the conditions does not occur. sent7: that the whammy does not occur results in that not the approaching Nyala but the vanishing happens. sent8: the whammy does not occur if the freeze-drying soutane does not occur and the bronchialness does not occur. sent9: if the vanishing does not occur that that the ordering does not occur and the expostulation does not occur is not correct is not incorrect. sent10: the solfege occurs. sent11: if that the tearing and the vanishing occurs is incorrect then the tearing does not occur. sent12: the tear occurs if the freeze-drying soutane does not occur. sent13: if the trailing does not occur then the whammy and the bronchialness happens. sent14: the minorsness does not occur and the spectacular does not occur. sent15: that the sporadicness occurs is brought about by that the regarding sigh does not occur. sent16: the affairs does not occur. sent17: if the whammy does not occur then that the tearing and the vanishing occurs is false. sent18: the expostulation does not occur. sent19: that the goading does not occur triggers that the hieroglyphicness happens. sent20: the scouring does not occur and the heterosexualness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vanishing does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ordering does not occur and the expostulation does not occur is wrong.; sent1 & sent18 -> int2: the ordering does not occur and the expostulation does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the vanishing occurs.; sent13 & sent5 -> int5: both the whammy and the bronchialness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the whammy happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the whammy and the vanishing occurs.; __UNKNOWN__