the fact that the fact that the natatorium is a simulcast and/or it is artful is true is false.
sent1: the plumule does alternate if the andradite is a Guaiacum. sent2: if the fact that the andradite is not a Guaiacum but it is a kind of a salute is not right the plumule is alternate. sent3: the fact that the andradite is not a Guaiacum but a salute does not hold. sent4: the fact that the andradite is a Guaiacum and it salutes is incorrect. sent5: something is a salute if the fact that it is a simulcast is correct. sent6: if something is not postganglionic then it is not nilpotent and it is alternate. sent7: the fact that something does not alternate and it is not nilpotent is not correct if it is not artful. sent8: the plumule salutes. sent9: the andradite is artful if the natatorium is a Guaiacum. sent10: the plumule is nilpotent. sent11: the fact that something is a simulcast or is artful or both is not true if it is not nilpotent. sent12: if the plumule is not non-alternate then the natatorium is not non-nilpotent. sent13: if something is nilpotent then it is artful. sent14: the plumule is a Guaiacum. sent15: the andradite is alternate if it is a Guaiacum. sent16: the fact that that the andradite is not a salute but artful is not true is not incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the andradite is not alternate and it is non-nilpotent is not correct the heronry is a salute.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the plumule is alternate.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the natatorium is nilpotent.; sent13 -> int3: if the natatorium is nilpotent it is artful.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the natatorium is not non-artful.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the natatorium is a kind of a simulcast and/or it is artful is not right.
sent6 -> int5: if the natatorium is not postganglionic then it is not nilpotent and alternates.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the natatorium is a simulcast and/or it is artful is true is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the plumule does alternate if the andradite is a Guaiacum. sent2: if the fact that the andradite is not a Guaiacum but it is a kind of a salute is not right the plumule is alternate. sent3: the fact that the andradite is not a Guaiacum but a salute does not hold. sent4: the fact that the andradite is a Guaiacum and it salutes is incorrect. sent5: something is a salute if the fact that it is a simulcast is correct. sent6: if something is not postganglionic then it is not nilpotent and it is alternate. sent7: the fact that something does not alternate and it is not nilpotent is not correct if it is not artful. sent8: the plumule salutes. sent9: the andradite is artful if the natatorium is a Guaiacum. sent10: the plumule is nilpotent. sent11: the fact that something is a simulcast or is artful or both is not true if it is not nilpotent. sent12: if the plumule is not non-alternate then the natatorium is not non-nilpotent. sent13: if something is nilpotent then it is artful. sent14: the plumule is a Guaiacum. sent15: the andradite is alternate if it is a Guaiacum. sent16: the fact that that the andradite is not a salute but artful is not true is not incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the andradite is not alternate and it is non-nilpotent is not correct the heronry is a salute. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the plumule is alternate.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the natatorium is nilpotent.; sent13 -> int3: if the natatorium is nilpotent it is artful.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the natatorium is not non-artful.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__