that the pion is a kind of a particulate hold.
sent1: if the pion does not articulate attribute then it is a particulate. sent2: the loner does not articulate antineoplastic if the fact that it is a colonialist and is not grassless is not true. sent3: the pion is either not a master or polyatomic or both if something articulates attribute. sent4: that something is a speedskater hold. sent5: there exists something such that it is gyroscopic. sent6: the depolarization is not a kind of a cogency or it does copper or both. sent7: the orphan officiates if the fact that the lipstick does not resent thumbstall and/or it does not give is wrong. sent8: that the pion is not a particulate if the terrier is not gyroscopic and does not articulate attribute is correct. sent9: that the pion is a kind of a Appalachians is correct. sent10: something that does not articulate attribute or is a kind of a cogency or both is a particulate. sent11: if the pion does not toilet-train seriema or it is a particulate or both it is a kind of a dorbeetle. sent12: the pion does articulate attribute and/or it is a cogency. sent13: the pion does not articulate attribute or is a kind of a cogency or both if there exists something such that it is gyroscopic. sent14: something magnetizes if it either is not a kind of a unwariness or is a annuitant or both. sent15: if something does not articulate attribute then it is a kind of a particulate. sent16: something besets if it is not a Belgian and/or it is a cosmetician. sent17: if something officiates it is a kind of a Burhinus. sent18: if the loner does not articulate antineoplastic that either the lipstick does not resent thumbstall or it does not give or both does not hold. sent19: if there is something such that it is gyroscopic either the pion does articulate attribute or it is a cogency or both. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is a hair is right then the larvacide is not gyroscopic or repines or both.
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the pion does not articulate attribute or it is a kind of a cogency or both.; sent10 -> int2: the pion is particulate if it does not articulate attribute and/or it is a cogency.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the pion is not a kind of a particulate is correct.
sent17 -> int3: if the orphan does officiate then it is a kind of a Burhinus.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pion is a kind of a particulate hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pion does not articulate attribute then it is a particulate. sent2: the loner does not articulate antineoplastic if the fact that it is a colonialist and is not grassless is not true. sent3: the pion is either not a master or polyatomic or both if something articulates attribute. sent4: that something is a speedskater hold. sent5: there exists something such that it is gyroscopic. sent6: the depolarization is not a kind of a cogency or it does copper or both. sent7: the orphan officiates if the fact that the lipstick does not resent thumbstall and/or it does not give is wrong. sent8: that the pion is not a particulate if the terrier is not gyroscopic and does not articulate attribute is correct. sent9: that the pion is a kind of a Appalachians is correct. sent10: something that does not articulate attribute or is a kind of a cogency or both is a particulate. sent11: if the pion does not toilet-train seriema or it is a particulate or both it is a kind of a dorbeetle. sent12: the pion does articulate attribute and/or it is a cogency. sent13: the pion does not articulate attribute or is a kind of a cogency or both if there exists something such that it is gyroscopic. sent14: something magnetizes if it either is not a kind of a unwariness or is a annuitant or both. sent15: if something does not articulate attribute then it is a kind of a particulate. sent16: something besets if it is not a Belgian and/or it is a cosmetician. sent17: if something officiates it is a kind of a Burhinus. sent18: if the loner does not articulate antineoplastic that either the lipstick does not resent thumbstall or it does not give or both does not hold. sent19: if there is something such that it is gyroscopic either the pion does articulate attribute or it is a cogency or both. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is a hair is right then the larvacide is not gyroscopic or repines or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the pion does not articulate attribute or it is a kind of a cogency or both.; sent10 -> int2: the pion is particulate if it does not articulate attribute and/or it is a cogency.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__