there is something such that if the fact that it does not oxygenate lay and it confederates is not true then it is a retroversion.
sent1: if that the toothpaste does not oxygenate lay and twills racism is not true that it is a seam is correct. sent2: if the protohippus does not oxygenate lay and confederates it is a kind of a retroversion. sent3: there exists something such that if that it oxygenates lay and it is a confederate does not hold then it is a retroversion. sent4: the protohippus is a confederate if that it does not oxygenate encasement and is literary is wrong. sent5: if the protohippus oxygenates lay it is a retroversion. sent6: there exists something such that if it oxygenates lay then the fact that it is a kind of a retroversion hold. sent7: the catananche does slither if the fact that it is not selfish and it is a kind of a retroversion is wrong. sent8: there is something such that if it does not confederate it is a retroversion. sent9: if that the protohippus is non-nonsignificant thing that does twill tablemate is not right it oxygenates lay. sent10: if the fact that the protohippus does not oxygenate lay and confederates is incorrect then it is a retroversion. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not oxygenate lay and is a kind of a confederate then it is a retroversion. sent12: the abattoir is literary if that it is not a propoxyphene and it does confederate is incorrect. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is not a theology and does encapsulate undernourishment is false then it is unimpressionable. sent14: if the fact that something is not unalike but it emblazons is not correct it foams. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is not vocal and it updates masseter is incorrect then it is a kind of a placebo.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the coelacanth is not unalike but it emblazons does not hold then it is a foaming.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it does not oxygenate lay and it confederates is not true then it is a retroversion. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the toothpaste does not oxygenate lay and twills racism is not true that it is a seam is correct. sent2: if the protohippus does not oxygenate lay and confederates it is a kind of a retroversion. sent3: there exists something such that if that it oxygenates lay and it is a confederate does not hold then it is a retroversion. sent4: the protohippus is a confederate if that it does not oxygenate encasement and is literary is wrong. sent5: if the protohippus oxygenates lay it is a retroversion. sent6: there exists something such that if it oxygenates lay then the fact that it is a kind of a retroversion hold. sent7: the catananche does slither if the fact that it is not selfish and it is a kind of a retroversion is wrong. sent8: there is something such that if it does not confederate it is a retroversion. sent9: if that the protohippus is non-nonsignificant thing that does twill tablemate is not right it oxygenates lay. sent10: if the fact that the protohippus does not oxygenate lay and confederates is incorrect then it is a retroversion. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not oxygenate lay and is a kind of a confederate then it is a retroversion. sent12: the abattoir is literary if that it is not a propoxyphene and it does confederate is incorrect. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is not a theology and does encapsulate undernourishment is false then it is unimpressionable. sent14: if the fact that something is not unalike but it emblazons is not correct it foams. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is not vocal and it updates masseter is incorrect then it is a kind of a placebo. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__