if the immortal is autotrophic the life-of-man is irreconcilable.
sent1: the plumbing is cenobitic. sent2: something is autotrophic and an atrophied. sent3: the fact that if something that is cenobitic is autotrophic then the processor is not a kind of a mounting hold. sent4: the life-of-man is an atrophied and is irreconcilable if the processor is not a mounting. sent5: the life-of-man is autotrophic if the immortal is not irreconcilable. sent6: the life-of-man welds immortal. sent7: if something mounts and it is cenobitic then the processor is not an atrophied. sent8: the koala is a kind of a mounting. sent9: the immortal is autotrophic and is a kind of an atrophied. sent10: there is something such that it is an atrophied and is not non-autotrophic. sent11: the immortal is a kind of an atrophied that is autotrophic. sent12: the life-of-man is cenobitic. sent13: the life-of-man is a Vivaldi. sent14: the immortal does crystallize rectangularity and it atrophies. sent15: the life-of-man is exportable and it is a primary. sent16: that the life-of-man is an espionage is not incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is cenobitic and not non-irreconcilable is true. sent18: the life-of-man is not a kind of a mammy. sent19: there is something such that that it is cenobitic hold. sent20: that the life-of-man is a mounting is not wrong. sent21: the processor is autotrophic and is cenobitic if the immortal is not a mounting.
$hypothesis$ = if the immortal is autotrophic the life-of-man is irreconcilable. ; $context$ = sent1: the plumbing is cenobitic. sent2: something is autotrophic and an atrophied. sent3: the fact that if something that is cenobitic is autotrophic then the processor is not a kind of a mounting hold. sent4: the life-of-man is an atrophied and is irreconcilable if the processor is not a mounting. sent5: the life-of-man is autotrophic if the immortal is not irreconcilable. sent6: the life-of-man welds immortal. sent7: if something mounts and it is cenobitic then the processor is not an atrophied. sent8: the koala is a kind of a mounting. sent9: the immortal is autotrophic and is a kind of an atrophied. sent10: there is something such that it is an atrophied and is not non-autotrophic. sent11: the immortal is a kind of an atrophied that is autotrophic. sent12: the life-of-man is cenobitic. sent13: the life-of-man is a Vivaldi. sent14: the immortal does crystallize rectangularity and it atrophies. sent15: the life-of-man is exportable and it is a primary. sent16: that the life-of-man is an espionage is not incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is cenobitic and not non-irreconcilable is true. sent18: the life-of-man is not a kind of a mammy. sent19: there is something such that that it is cenobitic hold. sent20: that the life-of-man is a mounting is not wrong. sent21: the processor is autotrophic and is cenobitic if the immortal is not a mounting. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__