the exacerbation does not occur and the argumentativeness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the Mycenaeanness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the transposing but not the barking occurs is incorrect. sent3: that the fatigue happens is brought about by the argumentativeness. sent4: the chromatinicness occurs and the Wilsonianness happens. sent5: if the jackknife occurs the imprinting happens. sent6: the fact that the reproduction does not occur and the contemning dimwit does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the fatigue happens then the ridiculing hypertext happens. sent8: the serendipity happens. sent9: the nonacceptance does not occur. sent10: the fact that the confining brigade happens hold. sent11: if that the exacerbation does not occur and the argumentativeness does not occur is not true then the fatigue happens. sent12: the jackknifing happens if the ridiculing hypertext occurs but the nonacceptance does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the exacerbation does not occur and the argumentativeness does not occur is not true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fatigue occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the ridiculing hypertext happens.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the ridiculing hypertext but not the nonacceptance happens.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the jackknifing occurs.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the imprint happens.; sent4 -> int6: the chromatinicness happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: both the imprint and the chromatinicness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the exacerbation does not occur and the argumentativeness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Mycenaeanness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the transposing but not the barking occurs is incorrect. sent3: that the fatigue happens is brought about by the argumentativeness. sent4: the chromatinicness occurs and the Wilsonianness happens. sent5: if the jackknife occurs the imprinting happens. sent6: the fact that the reproduction does not occur and the contemning dimwit does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the fatigue happens then the ridiculing hypertext happens. sent8: the serendipity happens. sent9: the nonacceptance does not occur. sent10: the fact that the confining brigade happens hold. sent11: if that the exacerbation does not occur and the argumentativeness does not occur is not true then the fatigue happens. sent12: the jackknifing happens if the ridiculing hypertext occurs but the nonacceptance does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the exacerbation does not occur and the argumentativeness does not occur is not true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fatigue occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the ridiculing hypertext happens.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the ridiculing hypertext but not the nonacceptance happens.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the jackknifing occurs.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the imprint happens.; sent4 -> int6: the chromatinicness happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: both the imprint and the chromatinicness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__