the trailhead is hymenopterous.
sent1: the two-timer is not a vocal if the fluorouracil does blackmail partridgeberry and is a kobo. sent2: the fluorouracil does blackmail partridgeberry. sent3: The partridgeberry does blackmail fluorouracil. sent4: the fact that the fluorouracil is a kobo hold. sent5: the ruga is a Kosovo and it is a couture. sent6: that the tridymite erases ruga is right if the ruga is a couture. sent7: if the two-timer is not a kind of a vocal then the tridymite is both not vocal and futuristic. sent8: if the tridymite is futuristic and disassociates that the trailhead is not hymenopterous is correct. sent9: if the ruga is not futuristic then the fact that the tridymite is non-vocal and does not disassociate is false. sent10: the tridymite is non-vocal. sent11: the fluorouracil does disassociate. sent12: if something does erase ruga then it disassociates.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the fluorouracil blackmails partridgeberry and it is a kobo is not false.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the two-timer is not a vocal.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the tridymite is both not vocal and futuristic.; int3 -> int4: the tridymite is futuristic.; sent12 -> int5: if the tridymite does erase ruga it disassociates.; sent5 -> int6: the ruga is a couture.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the tridymite does erase ruga.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the tridymite does disassociate.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the tridymite is a kind of futuristic thing that does disassociate.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the trailhead is hymenopterous.
$hypothesis$ = the trailhead is hymenopterous. ; $context$ = sent1: the two-timer is not a vocal if the fluorouracil does blackmail partridgeberry and is a kobo. sent2: the fluorouracil does blackmail partridgeberry. sent3: The partridgeberry does blackmail fluorouracil. sent4: the fact that the fluorouracil is a kobo hold. sent5: the ruga is a Kosovo and it is a couture. sent6: that the tridymite erases ruga is right if the ruga is a couture. sent7: if the two-timer is not a kind of a vocal then the tridymite is both not vocal and futuristic. sent8: if the tridymite is futuristic and disassociates that the trailhead is not hymenopterous is correct. sent9: if the ruga is not futuristic then the fact that the tridymite is non-vocal and does not disassociate is false. sent10: the tridymite is non-vocal. sent11: the fluorouracil does disassociate. sent12: if something does erase ruga then it disassociates. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the fluorouracil blackmails partridgeberry and it is a kobo is not false.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the two-timer is not a vocal.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the tridymite is both not vocal and futuristic.; int3 -> int4: the tridymite is futuristic.; sent12 -> int5: if the tridymite does erase ruga it disassociates.; sent5 -> int6: the ruga is a couture.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the tridymite does erase ruga.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the tridymite does disassociate.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the tridymite is a kind of futuristic thing that does disassociate.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__