the fact that that both the ventricularness and the cribbage occurs is not correct hold.
sent1: the outstaring skilletfish and/or the reducibleness happens. sent2: the ventricularness occurs. sent3: the lahar happens if the outstaring skilletfish happens. sent4: if the anecdotalness does not occur the restraining sun does not occur and the belt does not occur. sent5: both the ventricularness and the cribbage happens if the homeopathicness does not occur. sent6: if the outstaring skilletfish does not occur that the ventricularness happens and the cribbage happens does not hold. sent7: the outstaring refractoriness occurs. sent8: the lahar happens if the reducibleness occurs. sent9: the anecdotalness does not occur if that either the construction does not occur or the coming lover does not occur or both is not true. sent10: that the Bayesianness does not occur leads to that the abducent and the expression occurs. sent11: if the outstaring refractoriness does not occur the fact that that both the non-reducibleness and the lahar happens is correct is incorrect. sent12: the non-homeopathicness is caused by that the lahar and the outstaring refractoriness occurs. sent13: if the restraining sun does not occur and the belting does not occur then the homeopathicness happens.
sent1 & sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the lahar occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the lahar and the outstaring refractoriness happens.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the homeopathicness does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the ventricularness and the cribbage happens is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that both the ventricularness and the cribbage occurs is not correct hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the outstaring skilletfish and/or the reducibleness happens. sent2: the ventricularness occurs. sent3: the lahar happens if the outstaring skilletfish happens. sent4: if the anecdotalness does not occur the restraining sun does not occur and the belt does not occur. sent5: both the ventricularness and the cribbage happens if the homeopathicness does not occur. sent6: if the outstaring skilletfish does not occur that the ventricularness happens and the cribbage happens does not hold. sent7: the outstaring refractoriness occurs. sent8: the lahar happens if the reducibleness occurs. sent9: the anecdotalness does not occur if that either the construction does not occur or the coming lover does not occur or both is not true. sent10: that the Bayesianness does not occur leads to that the abducent and the expression occurs. sent11: if the outstaring refractoriness does not occur the fact that that both the non-reducibleness and the lahar happens is correct is incorrect. sent12: the non-homeopathicness is caused by that the lahar and the outstaring refractoriness occurs. sent13: if the restraining sun does not occur and the belting does not occur then the homeopathicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the lahar occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the lahar and the outstaring refractoriness happens.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the homeopathicness does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__