that both the motorcycling and the non-Malaysianess happens if the sophisticness does not occur is false.
sent1: that the sculpturalness does not occur hold. sent2: that the crustoseness happens but the overindulgence does not occur is brought about by that the assessment happens. sent3: the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent4: that the inelasticness happens is caused by that the sophisticness does not occur. sent5: if the sculpturalness does not occur the motorcycling and the venipuncture happens. sent6: the fact that if the fact that the efflorescence happens or the severance does not occur or both does not hold then that the wildness does not occur hold is not incorrect. sent7: that the acuteness occurs or the inelasticness does not occur or both does not hold if the sophisticness does not occur. sent8: that the liveliness does not occur results in that the Split happens. sent9: the injury happens. sent10: the fact that the inheritableness occurs or the sparring does not occur or both is not correct. sent11: that the etiolating or the non-entrepreneurialness or both occurs is not true if the deathblow does not occur. sent12: the Malaysia does not occur if the fact that the acuteness occurs and/or the inelasticness does not occur does not hold. sent13: if the effecting packrat does not occur then the jihadiness occurs. sent14: the contagion happens. sent15: the venipuncture occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the sophisticness does not occur hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the acute and/or the non-inelasticness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Malaysia does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the motorcycling and the venipuncture occurs.; int3 -> int4: the motorcycling happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the motorcycling and the non-Malaysianess happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the motorcycling and the non-Malaysianess happens if the sophisticness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sculpturalness does not occur hold. sent2: that the crustoseness happens but the overindulgence does not occur is brought about by that the assessment happens. sent3: the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent4: that the inelasticness happens is caused by that the sophisticness does not occur. sent5: if the sculpturalness does not occur the motorcycling and the venipuncture happens. sent6: the fact that if the fact that the efflorescence happens or the severance does not occur or both does not hold then that the wildness does not occur hold is not incorrect. sent7: that the acuteness occurs or the inelasticness does not occur or both does not hold if the sophisticness does not occur. sent8: that the liveliness does not occur results in that the Split happens. sent9: the injury happens. sent10: the fact that the inheritableness occurs or the sparring does not occur or both is not correct. sent11: that the etiolating or the non-entrepreneurialness or both occurs is not true if the deathblow does not occur. sent12: the Malaysia does not occur if the fact that the acuteness occurs and/or the inelasticness does not occur does not hold. sent13: if the effecting packrat does not occur then the jihadiness occurs. sent14: the contagion happens. sent15: the venipuncture occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the sophisticness does not occur hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the acute and/or the non-inelasticness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Malaysia does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the motorcycling and the venipuncture occurs.; int3 -> int4: the motorcycling happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the motorcycling and the non-Malaysianess happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__