the koto is not a mysticism.
sent1: The Reno does sterilize koto. sent2: the cloaca is a mysticism if the koto does combine but it does not sterilize Reno. sent3: if something that does combine sterilizes Reno it is not a mysticism. sent4: if the fact that something does not second and does not transitivize is wrong then it does transitivize. sent5: if the Munch does not sterilize Reno then the koto is both a mysticism and a combined. sent6: the koto does sterilize Reno. sent7: the koto is a combined.
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the koto is a combined and does sterilize Reno.; sent3 -> int2: if the koto combines and it sterilizes Reno it is not a mysticism.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the cloaca is a mysticism.
sent4 -> int3: the koto does transitivize if that it is not second and it does not transitivize is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the koto is not a mysticism. ; $context$ = sent1: The Reno does sterilize koto. sent2: the cloaca is a mysticism if the koto does combine but it does not sterilize Reno. sent3: if something that does combine sterilizes Reno it is not a mysticism. sent4: if the fact that something does not second and does not transitivize is wrong then it does transitivize. sent5: if the Munch does not sterilize Reno then the koto is both a mysticism and a combined. sent6: the koto does sterilize Reno. sent7: the koto is a combined. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the koto is a combined and does sterilize Reno.; sent3 -> int2: if the koto combines and it sterilizes Reno it is not a mysticism.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__