the fact that the fact that not the sinker but the cohabitation occurs is not incorrect is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the rulership occurs but the Bantu does not occur is false the fact that the infiltration does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the invoking nibbler occurs. sent3: if the agranulocyticness does not occur the contemplation but not the guessing contadino occurs. sent4: that the infiltration occurs is right if the contemplation but not the guessing contadino happens. sent5: the fact that the sinker does not occur but the cohabitation happens is false if the immigrating happens. sent6: the dent occurs if the agranulocyticness happens. sent7: that the fact that not the agranulocyticness but the sinker happens is wrong is not incorrect if the immigrating does not occur. sent8: if the dent happens that the immigrating does not occur does not hold. sent9: if that not the agranulocyticness but the sinker happens is not right then the sinker does not occur. sent10: if the invoking nibbler occurs the fact that both the rulership and the non-Bantuness happens is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agranulocyticness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the contemplation occurs but the guessing contadino does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the infiltration occurs.; sent10 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that that the rulership and the non-Bantuness occurs is true is not correct.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the infiltration does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the agranulocyticness does not occur does not hold.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the dent occurs.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the immigrating happens is right.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the sinker does not occur and the cohabitation happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that not the sinker but the cohabitation occurs is not incorrect is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the rulership occurs but the Bantu does not occur is false the fact that the infiltration does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the invoking nibbler occurs. sent3: if the agranulocyticness does not occur the contemplation but not the guessing contadino occurs. sent4: that the infiltration occurs is right if the contemplation but not the guessing contadino happens. sent5: the fact that the sinker does not occur but the cohabitation happens is false if the immigrating happens. sent6: the dent occurs if the agranulocyticness happens. sent7: that the fact that not the agranulocyticness but the sinker happens is wrong is not incorrect if the immigrating does not occur. sent8: if the dent happens that the immigrating does not occur does not hold. sent9: if that not the agranulocyticness but the sinker happens is not right then the sinker does not occur. sent10: if the invoking nibbler occurs the fact that both the rulership and the non-Bantuness happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the agranulocyticness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the contemplation occurs but the guessing contadino does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the infiltration occurs.; sent10 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that that the rulership and the non-Bantuness occurs is true is not correct.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the infiltration does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the agranulocyticness does not occur does not hold.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the dent occurs.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: that the immigrating happens is right.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__