that the phosphate does surface phosphate and/or is a Wilde is not correct.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not surface phosphate the Westernization is a Wilde and is not Anglophobic. sent2: if something is amphitheatric but not Anglophobic then it does not surface phosphate. sent3: something is both a Wilde and not a sluggishness if it spoils cyclopropane. sent4: the fact that the Westernization does not surface phosphate if the Westernization is a kind of amphitheatric thing that is Anglophobic is not wrong. sent5: something spoils cyclopropane but it is not amphitheatric if it is Anglophobic. sent6: the Westernization is not Anglophobic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not spoil cyclopropane is right. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does amplify dysphasia and it does not spoil bolivar does not hold. sent8: if the disposable does amplify dysphasia then the phosphate spoils bolivar. sent9: the phosphate does not surface phosphate. sent10: that the loading is a kind of non-phallic thing that is anagrammatic is incorrect. sent11: the Westernization is not Anglophobic. sent12: if something that is amphitheatric is not non-Anglophobic it does not surface phosphate. sent13: if something spoils bolivar then it does surface phosphate. sent14: if the disposable is not amphitheatric then the Westernization is a Wilde and it spoils cyclopropane. sent15: there is something such that it does not spoil cyclopropane. sent16: there is something such that it does spoil cyclopropane. sent17: the Westernization is amphitheatric and is not Anglophobic if there is something such that it does not spoil cyclopropane. sent18: if the phosphate surfaces phosphate that the Westernization is Anglophobic is not wrong. sent19: if the Westernization does not surface phosphate then the phosphate does not surface phosphate.
sent15 & sent17 -> int1: the Westernization is a kind of amphitheatric thing that is not Anglophobic.; sent2 -> int2: if the Westernization is amphitheatric thing that is not Anglophobic it does not surface phosphate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Westernization does not surface phosphate.;
the phosphate does surface phosphate and/or it is a Wilde.
$hypothesis$ = that the phosphate does surface phosphate and/or is a Wilde is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not surface phosphate the Westernization is a Wilde and is not Anglophobic. sent2: if something is amphitheatric but not Anglophobic then it does not surface phosphate. sent3: something is both a Wilde and not a sluggishness if it spoils cyclopropane. sent4: the fact that the Westernization does not surface phosphate if the Westernization is a kind of amphitheatric thing that is Anglophobic is not wrong. sent5: something spoils cyclopropane but it is not amphitheatric if it is Anglophobic. sent6: the Westernization is not Anglophobic if there exists something such that the fact that it does not spoil cyclopropane is right. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does amplify dysphasia and it does not spoil bolivar does not hold. sent8: if the disposable does amplify dysphasia then the phosphate spoils bolivar. sent9: the phosphate does not surface phosphate. sent10: that the loading is a kind of non-phallic thing that is anagrammatic is incorrect. sent11: the Westernization is not Anglophobic. sent12: if something that is amphitheatric is not non-Anglophobic it does not surface phosphate. sent13: if something spoils bolivar then it does surface phosphate. sent14: if the disposable is not amphitheatric then the Westernization is a Wilde and it spoils cyclopropane. sent15: there is something such that it does not spoil cyclopropane. sent16: there is something such that it does spoil cyclopropane. sent17: the Westernization is amphitheatric and is not Anglophobic if there is something such that it does not spoil cyclopropane. sent18: if the phosphate surfaces phosphate that the Westernization is Anglophobic is not wrong. sent19: if the Westernization does not surface phosphate then the phosphate does not surface phosphate. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent17 -> int1: the Westernization is a kind of amphitheatric thing that is not Anglophobic.; sent2 -> int2: if the Westernization is amphitheatric thing that is not Anglophobic it does not surface phosphate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Westernization does not surface phosphate.; __UNKNOWN__