the fact that the harvesting does not occur and the flinching does not occur is not right.
sent1: the bad does not occur if the fact that the prandialness but not the preening occurs is false. sent2: if that the ambulatoriness and/or the depravity happens is not right then the flinching does not occur. sent3: that the apetalousness does not occur is not wrong. sent4: both the badness and the soldiering puberty happens if the fact that the inclusiveness happens is not correct. sent5: the harvest does not occur if that the harvest occurs but the singlesness does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the Mesoamerican does not occur. sent7: the fact that the prandialness occurs and the preening happens is false if the protest does not occur. sent8: that both the harvest and the non-singlesness occurs is incorrect. sent9: if the protesting does not occur then the fact that the prandialness but not the preening occurs does not hold. sent10: the inclusiveness does not occur. sent11: the soldiering puberty occurs. sent12: if the inclusiveness does not occur the fact that the soldiering puberty occurs is true. sent13: if the fact that the protesting happens hold then the depravity happens. sent14: if the negotiating reassignment occurs the fact that either the overtness occurs or the order does not occur or both is wrong. sent15: the bad does not occur if the preening occurs. sent16: the fact that the shifting but not the chelicerousness happens does not hold. sent17: that the shrinkage occurs but the bibliopolicness does not occur is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the prandialness and the preening happens is not true. sent19: the bunfight and the quivering tenement occurs. sent20: if the fact that the ambulatoriness happens or the depravity does not occur or both is incorrect the flinching does not occur. sent21: both the soldiering headache and the immutableness occurs. sent22: if the protest occurs then the fact that the ambulatory occurs and/or the depravity does not occur is false. sent23: that the depravity occurs is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the protest does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the prandialness happens but the preening does not occur is not false is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the badness does not occur.; sent4 & sent10 -> int3: the badness happens and the soldiering puberty happens.; int3 -> int4: the bad happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the protesting happens.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: that the ambulatoriness happens and/or the depravity does not occur is not true.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: the flinching does not occur.; sent5 & sent8 -> int9: that the harvesting does not occur hold.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that that the fact that the harvesting does not occur and the flinching does not occur is not false is false is not incorrect.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the harvesting does not occur and the flinching does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the bad does not occur if the fact that the prandialness but not the preening occurs is false. sent2: if that the ambulatoriness and/or the depravity happens is not right then the flinching does not occur. sent3: that the apetalousness does not occur is not wrong. sent4: both the badness and the soldiering puberty happens if the fact that the inclusiveness happens is not correct. sent5: the harvest does not occur if that the harvest occurs but the singlesness does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the Mesoamerican does not occur. sent7: the fact that the prandialness occurs and the preening happens is false if the protest does not occur. sent8: that both the harvest and the non-singlesness occurs is incorrect. sent9: if the protesting does not occur then the fact that the prandialness but not the preening occurs does not hold. sent10: the inclusiveness does not occur. sent11: the soldiering puberty occurs. sent12: if the inclusiveness does not occur the fact that the soldiering puberty occurs is true. sent13: if the fact that the protesting happens hold then the depravity happens. sent14: if the negotiating reassignment occurs the fact that either the overtness occurs or the order does not occur or both is wrong. sent15: the bad does not occur if the preening occurs. sent16: the fact that the shifting but not the chelicerousness happens does not hold. sent17: that the shrinkage occurs but the bibliopolicness does not occur is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the prandialness and the preening happens is not true. sent19: the bunfight and the quivering tenement occurs. sent20: if the fact that the ambulatoriness happens or the depravity does not occur or both is incorrect the flinching does not occur. sent21: both the soldiering headache and the immutableness occurs. sent22: if the protest occurs then the fact that the ambulatory occurs and/or the depravity does not occur is false. sent23: that the depravity occurs is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the protest does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the prandialness happens but the preening does not occur is not false is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the badness does not occur.; sent4 & sent10 -> int3: the badness happens and the soldiering puberty happens.; int3 -> int4: the bad happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the protesting happens.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: that the ambulatoriness happens and/or the depravity does not occur is not true.; int7 & sent20 -> int8: the flinching does not occur.; sent5 & sent8 -> int9: that the harvesting does not occur hold.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__