if the fuddy-duddy is not a kind of a beehive then the reduction does not solve.
sent1: the reduction is not mesenteric. sent2: the reduction solves if the fuddy-duddy is not a beehive. sent3: the reduction does not solve if there is something such that that it is polytheistic and/or it is not mesenteric does not hold. sent4: that something solves or it is not polytheistic or both is not incorrect. sent5: the reduction does not solve if there is something such that that it is polytheistic or it is mesenteric or both does not hold. sent6: the fuddy-duddy is mesenteric. sent7: the fuddy-duddy does not overcharge. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is polytheistic and/or it does not solve is wrong then that the fuddy-duddy is not mesenteric hold. sent9: that that the fuddy-duddy is polytheistic and/or it is not mesenteric is correct does not hold if it is not a beehive. sent10: the reduction is not a beehive. sent11: the fuddy-duddy is mesenteric if it is not a kind of a beehive. sent12: that the reduction is a stodginess and/or it does not spoon intriguing is not true if it is not a kind of a beehive. sent13: that the fuddy-duddy solves or is not mesenteric or both is incorrect. sent14: that the paramagnet does spoon Karpov and/or is not a beehive is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fuddy-duddy is not a beehive.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the fuddy-duddy is polytheistic or it is not mesenteric or both is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is polytheistic and/or it is not mesenteric does not hold.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the reduction does not solve.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fuddy-duddy is not a kind of a beehive then the reduction does not solve. ; $context$ = sent1: the reduction is not mesenteric. sent2: the reduction solves if the fuddy-duddy is not a beehive. sent3: the reduction does not solve if there is something such that that it is polytheistic and/or it is not mesenteric does not hold. sent4: that something solves or it is not polytheistic or both is not incorrect. sent5: the reduction does not solve if there is something such that that it is polytheistic or it is mesenteric or both does not hold. sent6: the fuddy-duddy is mesenteric. sent7: the fuddy-duddy does not overcharge. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is polytheistic and/or it does not solve is wrong then that the fuddy-duddy is not mesenteric hold. sent9: that that the fuddy-duddy is polytheistic and/or it is not mesenteric is correct does not hold if it is not a beehive. sent10: the reduction is not a beehive. sent11: the fuddy-duddy is mesenteric if it is not a kind of a beehive. sent12: that the reduction is a stodginess and/or it does not spoon intriguing is not true if it is not a kind of a beehive. sent13: that the fuddy-duddy solves or is not mesenteric or both is incorrect. sent14: that the paramagnet does spoon Karpov and/or is not a beehive is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fuddy-duddy is not a beehive.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the fuddy-duddy is polytheistic or it is not mesenteric or both is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is polytheistic and/or it is not mesenteric does not hold.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the reduction does not solve.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__