that either the provincial is not iliac or it does sicken steps or both is false.
sent1: if something is not Uzbekistani or does not bar coziness or both then the fact that it is a Amblyrhynchus is not false. sent2: the trombonist is both not a mastoid and bold. sent3: the solute is not a flatness if there exists something such that the fact that it is not Uzbekistani or it does not bar coziness or both is incorrect. sent4: if the trombonist is both not non-mastoid and bold the solute is a flatness. sent5: there exists something such that it is Uzbekistani. sent6: if the trombonist is not a kind of a Amblyrhynchus and/or it is not flatness then it is a mastoid. sent7: if the solute does not sicken steps but it is Uzbekistani then the provincial is a kind of a flatness. sent8: if the provincial is not Uzbekistani then it is a kind of a Amblyrhynchus. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it bars coziness is right. sent10: that if the trombonist is both not mastoid and bold then the solute is a flatness is not incorrect. sent11: something is non-iliac and/or sickens steps if it is a kind of a Amblyrhynchus. sent12: if something is not mastoid then that it is a kind of a flatness and it is a kind of a Amblyrhynchus is correct. sent13: if something is not Uzbekistani it is a Amblyrhynchus. sent14: the solute is iliac.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the provincial either is not Uzbekistani or does not bar coziness or both is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it either is not Uzbekistani or does not bar coziness or both does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the solute is not a flatness.; sent10 & sent2 -> int3: the solute is not non-flatness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the provincial is not Uzbekistani and/or does not bar coziness.; sent1 -> int6: if the provincial is not Uzbekistani or it does not bar coziness or both it is a Amblyrhynchus.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the provincial is a Amblyrhynchus.; sent11 -> int8: if the provincial is a Amblyrhynchus it is not iliac and/or sickens steps.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that either the provincial is not iliac or it sickens steps or both is not correct.
sent12 -> int9: the provincial is a kind of a flatness and it is a Amblyrhynchus if it is not mastoid.;
$hypothesis$ = that either the provincial is not iliac or it does sicken steps or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not Uzbekistani or does not bar coziness or both then the fact that it is a Amblyrhynchus is not false. sent2: the trombonist is both not a mastoid and bold. sent3: the solute is not a flatness if there exists something such that the fact that it is not Uzbekistani or it does not bar coziness or both is incorrect. sent4: if the trombonist is both not non-mastoid and bold the solute is a flatness. sent5: there exists something such that it is Uzbekistani. sent6: if the trombonist is not a kind of a Amblyrhynchus and/or it is not flatness then it is a mastoid. sent7: if the solute does not sicken steps but it is Uzbekistani then the provincial is a kind of a flatness. sent8: if the provincial is not Uzbekistani then it is a kind of a Amblyrhynchus. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it bars coziness is right. sent10: that if the trombonist is both not mastoid and bold then the solute is a flatness is not incorrect. sent11: something is non-iliac and/or sickens steps if it is a kind of a Amblyrhynchus. sent12: if something is not mastoid then that it is a kind of a flatness and it is a kind of a Amblyrhynchus is correct. sent13: if something is not Uzbekistani it is a Amblyrhynchus. sent14: the solute is iliac. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the provincial either is not Uzbekistani or does not bar coziness or both is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it either is not Uzbekistani or does not bar coziness or both does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the solute is not a flatness.; sent10 & sent2 -> int3: the solute is not non-flatness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the provincial is not Uzbekistani and/or does not bar coziness.; sent1 -> int6: if the provincial is not Uzbekistani or it does not bar coziness or both it is a Amblyrhynchus.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the provincial is a Amblyrhynchus.; sent11 -> int8: if the provincial is a Amblyrhynchus it is not iliac and/or sickens steps.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__