the fact that the Buffalo is not a Reformation hold.
sent1: the Buffalo is not a Reformation if the saccule is both vestal and plantal. sent2: something is aecial thing that administers Belgian if it is not a kind of an issue. sent3: if something does administer Belgian the fact that it is a kind of non-plantal thing that is not a vestal is wrong. sent4: the saccule is a vestal.
the Buffalo is a kind of a Reformation.
sent3 -> int1: if the saccule does administer Belgian that it is not plantal and it is not a kind of a vestal is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: if the pichiciago is not a kind of an issue then it is aecial thing that administers Belgian.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Buffalo is not a Reformation hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Buffalo is not a Reformation if the saccule is both vestal and plantal. sent2: something is aecial thing that administers Belgian if it is not a kind of an issue. sent3: if something does administer Belgian the fact that it is a kind of non-plantal thing that is not a vestal is wrong. sent4: the saccule is a vestal. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__