the termination is a CIO.
sent1: the procrastinator does not salt seconder if the fact that it is not prefectural and it does not paw is incorrect. sent2: that if the fact that the fact that the seconder either is prefectural or is not a kind of a Laburnum or both is incorrect is true then that the ghostwriter is prefectural is not incorrect is correct. sent3: the lumpfish does discountenance fashion and/or it paws. sent4: something is not a CIO and it is not a optative if it salts seconder. sent5: if the termination does not salt seconder then the procrastinator is a CIO. sent6: if the seconder is a touch-typist the ghostwriter is a counterdemonstrator. sent7: either the seconder is a touch-typist or it is a counterdemonstrator or both. sent8: the procrastinator discountenances fashion but it is not a Laburnum if the ghostwriter is not unicameral. sent9: something salts seconder and it is a kind of a paw if it is not prefectural. sent10: if the lumpfish is unicameral thing that does not discountenance fashion the termination is a CIO. sent11: the ghostwriter does not discountenance fashion. sent12: if something that discountenances fashion is not a Laburnum then it is wieldy. sent13: if that something is a kind of a optative and it is a CIO is not correct that it is not a kind of a CIO is not incorrect. sent14: if the ghostwriter does not paw the seconder is a Laburnum and it is prefectural. sent15: if the procrastinator is a kind of a optative and/or it salts seconder the ghostwriter does not paw. sent16: the procrastinator is optative. sent17: the ghostwriter is postmodernist. sent18: if something is not a kind of a paw and/or discountenances canecutter then that the Testudo discountenances canecutter hold. sent19: something is not unicameral if it is postmodernist and it is a kind of a counterdemonstrator. sent20: the seconder is a Laburnum. sent21: if the ghostwriter is prefectural it does not paw and/or discountenances canecutter. sent22: that the termination is prefectural is not incorrect. sent23: something is unicameral and does not discountenance fashion if it is not wieldy.
sent16 -> int1: the procrastinator is a kind of a optative and/or it does salt seconder.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the ghostwriter is not a paw.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the seconder is a kind of a Laburnum and is prefectural.; sent23 -> int4: if the lumpfish is not wieldy then that it is unicameral and it does not discountenance fashion is not incorrect.;
the termination is not a CIO.
sent4 -> int5: the termination is not a CIO and it is not a optative if it does salt seconder.; sent9 -> int6: if the termination is non-prefectural it salts seconder and is a paw.; sent12 -> int7: the procrastinator is not unwieldy if it discountenances fashion and it is not a Laburnum.; sent19 -> int8: the ghostwriter is not unicameral if it is both postmodernist and a counterdemonstrator.;
$hypothesis$ = the termination is a CIO. ; $context$ = sent1: the procrastinator does not salt seconder if the fact that it is not prefectural and it does not paw is incorrect. sent2: that if the fact that the fact that the seconder either is prefectural or is not a kind of a Laburnum or both is incorrect is true then that the ghostwriter is prefectural is not incorrect is correct. sent3: the lumpfish does discountenance fashion and/or it paws. sent4: something is not a CIO and it is not a optative if it salts seconder. sent5: if the termination does not salt seconder then the procrastinator is a CIO. sent6: if the seconder is a touch-typist the ghostwriter is a counterdemonstrator. sent7: either the seconder is a touch-typist or it is a counterdemonstrator or both. sent8: the procrastinator discountenances fashion but it is not a Laburnum if the ghostwriter is not unicameral. sent9: something salts seconder and it is a kind of a paw if it is not prefectural. sent10: if the lumpfish is unicameral thing that does not discountenance fashion the termination is a CIO. sent11: the ghostwriter does not discountenance fashion. sent12: if something that discountenances fashion is not a Laburnum then it is wieldy. sent13: if that something is a kind of a optative and it is a CIO is not correct that it is not a kind of a CIO is not incorrect. sent14: if the ghostwriter does not paw the seconder is a Laburnum and it is prefectural. sent15: if the procrastinator is a kind of a optative and/or it salts seconder the ghostwriter does not paw. sent16: the procrastinator is optative. sent17: the ghostwriter is postmodernist. sent18: if something is not a kind of a paw and/or discountenances canecutter then that the Testudo discountenances canecutter hold. sent19: something is not unicameral if it is postmodernist and it is a kind of a counterdemonstrator. sent20: the seconder is a Laburnum. sent21: if the ghostwriter is prefectural it does not paw and/or discountenances canecutter. sent22: that the termination is prefectural is not incorrect. sent23: something is unicameral and does not discountenance fashion if it is not wieldy. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the procrastinator is a kind of a optative and/or it does salt seconder.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the ghostwriter is not a paw.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the seconder is a kind of a Laburnum and is prefectural.; sent23 -> int4: if the lumpfish is not wieldy then that it is unicameral and it does not discountenance fashion is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__