the fact that there is something such that if that it does glare and it is not a kind of a Freetown does not hold it is a mannitol is not correct.
sent1: if that something outgenerals raincoat and is not a Tudor is not true then that it is a kind of a ceftazidime is correct. sent2: there is something such that if that it does headquarter sandpit and it does not bulge is false the fact that it is a kind of a tundra is true. sent3: there is something such that if it is orthodontics it is a jabberwocky. sent4: there exists something such that if it is laryngopharyngeal it is rocky. sent5: there is something such that if that it is nonruminant and it is not a kind of an internationalization is not right then the fact that it is an acne hold. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a temp that is not a hooknose is wrong it outgenerals disregard. sent7: if that the hamster is not a kind of a Freetown is not incorrect it is bolometric. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a glare then that it is a mannitol is true. sent9: there exists something such that if it is both a glare and not a Freetown it is a mannitol. sent10: if the hamster does glare but it is not a Freetown then it is a mannitol. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Freetown it is a mannitol. sent12: if the fact that the hamster is an acne that outgenerals rawness does not hold it is a glare. sent13: the hamster is a mannitol if the fact that it is a glare but not a Freetown is incorrect. sent14: if the hamster is not a glare then it is a mannitol. sent15: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a glare and is a Freetown is wrong then it is a mannitol is correct. sent16: the hamster is a mannitol if that it glares and is a kind of a Freetown is not correct. sent17: there exists something such that if that it is extrusive and it does object jawan is wrong then it is hidrotic.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it outgenerals raincoat and it is not a kind of a Tudor is incorrect then it is a ceftazidime.
sent1 -> int1: the jawan is a kind of a ceftazidime if the fact that it does outgeneral raincoat and is not a kind of a Tudor is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it does glare and it is not a kind of a Freetown does not hold it is a mannitol is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something outgenerals raincoat and is not a Tudor is not true then that it is a kind of a ceftazidime is correct. sent2: there is something such that if that it does headquarter sandpit and it does not bulge is false the fact that it is a kind of a tundra is true. sent3: there is something such that if it is orthodontics it is a jabberwocky. sent4: there exists something such that if it is laryngopharyngeal it is rocky. sent5: there is something such that if that it is nonruminant and it is not a kind of an internationalization is not right then the fact that it is an acne hold. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a temp that is not a hooknose is wrong it outgenerals disregard. sent7: if that the hamster is not a kind of a Freetown is not incorrect it is bolometric. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a glare then that it is a mannitol is true. sent9: there exists something such that if it is both a glare and not a Freetown it is a mannitol. sent10: if the hamster does glare but it is not a Freetown then it is a mannitol. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Freetown it is a mannitol. sent12: if the fact that the hamster is an acne that outgenerals rawness does not hold it is a glare. sent13: the hamster is a mannitol if the fact that it is a glare but not a Freetown is incorrect. sent14: if the hamster is not a glare then it is a mannitol. sent15: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a glare and is a Freetown is wrong then it is a mannitol is correct. sent16: the hamster is a mannitol if that it glares and is a kind of a Freetown is not correct. sent17: there exists something such that if that it is extrusive and it does object jawan is wrong then it is hidrotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__