the fact that there is something such that if it is irreconcilable then that it does not hide and it does not vex propagator is not correct is false.
sent1: that the baroreceptor is not a kind of a hide and it does not decorate ONI does not hold if it is a shoulder. sent2: there is something such that if that it flames is right it is not a kind of a actomyosin and does not decorate Calycanthus. sent3: there exists something such that if it is irreconcilable the fact that it is a hide and does not vex propagator is not right. sent4: if the baroreceptor is irreconcilable it does not hide and it does not vex propagator. sent5: the fact that something does not pan foaming and it is not quintessential does not hold if it is a self-expression. sent6: if something is irreconcilable then the fact that it is not a kind of a hide and it does not vex propagator is not true. sent7: that if that the baroreceptor is the acolyte hold then that the fact that the baroreceptor is interior but not a Upanishad hold is not right is true.
sent6 -> int1: if the baroreceptor is irreconcilable the fact that it is not a hide and does not vex propagator is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is irreconcilable then that it does not hide and it does not vex propagator is not correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the baroreceptor is not a kind of a hide and it does not decorate ONI does not hold if it is a shoulder. sent2: there is something such that if that it flames is right it is not a kind of a actomyosin and does not decorate Calycanthus. sent3: there exists something such that if it is irreconcilable the fact that it is a hide and does not vex propagator is not right. sent4: if the baroreceptor is irreconcilable it does not hide and it does not vex propagator. sent5: the fact that something does not pan foaming and it is not quintessential does not hold if it is a self-expression. sent6: if something is irreconcilable then the fact that it is not a kind of a hide and it does not vex propagator is not true. sent7: that if that the baroreceptor is the acolyte hold then that the fact that the baroreceptor is interior but not a Upanishad hold is not right is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the baroreceptor is irreconcilable the fact that it is not a hide and does not vex propagator is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__