that there is something such that if that it is a kind of apicultural thing that is not an unconscious is wrong it is not a Wyatt is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is apicultural and it is not unconscious it is not a Wyatt. sent2: that something is not tasteless is true if the fact that it is proprioceptive and does not Simonize idle is false. sent3: if the fact that the tinplate is apicultural but it is not an unconscious is false it is not a Wyatt. sent4: if the tinplate is not a Shema then it is not an unconscious. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the meridian is a kind of unconscious thing that does not heat asterism does not hold is not incorrect then it is not an invariant. sent6: if that the tinplate is both a Nasua and not a Wyatt is not correct then it does not tessellate. sent7: if that something is a mesomorphy but it is not a projector does not hold it is not credible. sent8: there is something such that if that it does heat drive and is not a befoulment is wrong it keys. sent9: if that the tinplate is apicultural and is not a kind of an unconscious does not hold then it is a Wyatt. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it Simonizes cygnet and it is a punt is not correct then it does not lunch ableism. sent11: if the fact that the fact that the tinplate is a quarters and a canto is true is incorrect then that it is not a kind of a befoulment is true. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not lunch one-thousandth is true then it does not heat gauss. sent13: if the cygnet is non-apicultural it is not short-order.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the newspaper is not tasteless if that it is proprioceptive thing that does not Simonize idle is not true.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it is a kind of apicultural thing that is not an unconscious is wrong it is not a Wyatt is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is apicultural and it is not unconscious it is not a Wyatt. sent2: that something is not tasteless is true if the fact that it is proprioceptive and does not Simonize idle is false. sent3: if the fact that the tinplate is apicultural but it is not an unconscious is false it is not a Wyatt. sent4: if the tinplate is not a Shema then it is not an unconscious. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the meridian is a kind of unconscious thing that does not heat asterism does not hold is not incorrect then it is not an invariant. sent6: if that the tinplate is both a Nasua and not a Wyatt is not correct then it does not tessellate. sent7: if that something is a mesomorphy but it is not a projector does not hold it is not credible. sent8: there is something such that if that it does heat drive and is not a befoulment is wrong it keys. sent9: if that the tinplate is apicultural and is not a kind of an unconscious does not hold then it is a Wyatt. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it Simonizes cygnet and it is a punt is not correct then it does not lunch ableism. sent11: if the fact that the fact that the tinplate is a quarters and a canto is true is incorrect then that it is not a kind of a befoulment is true. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not lunch one-thousandth is true then it does not heat gauss. sent13: if the cygnet is non-apicultural it is not short-order. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__