that the technophile is not accusatorial and it is not a kind of a cartoonist is false.
sent1: the technophile is not accusatorial and it is not a cartoonist if it is not a stemmer. sent2: the voicemail wires and it does destain kiang if the pet is not a kind of a Qum. sent3: if that the basketweaver is both not a Qum and not a jazz is wrong the pet is not a Qum. sent4: if the voicemail is a wire and it destains kiang the Malian does not destains kiang. sent5: the weathercock is a cartoonist. sent6: if there is something such that it does not destain kiang the blackbird is not elegiac and does not sound requiescat. sent7: if the self-heal is not Platonic that the technophile is a future but it is not Platonic is not right. sent8: the fact that something is both a stemmer and a clipper is not correct if it is non-elegiac. sent9: that the self-heal is accusatorial and is not Platonic is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the technophile is both future and not Platonic is not right then it is not a kind of a stemmer. sent11: if there exists something such that it destains camlet that the basketweaver is not a kind of a Qum and it is not a jazz is not correct. sent12: if the fact that something is a stemmer and it is a clipper is wrong then it is not future. sent13: the Sabahan is complete and/or is not Platonic if there are non-future things. sent14: the self-heal is not a kind of a binger if the fact that it is accusatorial and it is not a kind of a fireclay is not correct. sent15: if the self-heal is not a Ottoman the fact that the technophile is not accusatorial and it is not a cartoonist is incorrect. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it destains camlet is correct. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Ottoman is right. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a Ottoman the self-heal is both incomplete and not Platonic.
sent17 & sent18 -> int1: the self-heal is incomplete and is not Platonic.; int1 -> int2: the self-heal is non-Platonic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the technophile is not non-future but it is non-Platonic is wrong.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the technophile is not a stemmer.; int4 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
that the technophile is not accusatorial and it is not a cartoonist is not right.
sent12 -> int5: that the blackbird is not a future is not false if the fact that it is a kind of a stemmer and it is a kind of a clipper is wrong.; sent8 -> int6: if the blackbird is not elegiac that it is both a stemmer and a clipper is not right.; sent16 & sent11 -> int7: that the basketweaver is not a kind of a Qum and it does not jazz is false.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the pet is not a Qum.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the voicemail does wire and it does destain kiang hold.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the Malian does not destain kiang.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it does not destain kiang.; int11 & sent6 -> int12: the blackbird is a kind of non-elegiac thing that does not sound requiescat.; int12 -> int13: the blackbird is not elegiac.; int6 & int13 -> int14: that the blackbird is a kind of a stemmer that is a clipper is incorrect.; int5 & int14 -> int15: the blackbird is not a future.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is not a future.; int16 & sent13 -> int17: the Sabahan is not incomplete and/or it is not Platonic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the technophile is not accusatorial and it is not a kind of a cartoonist is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the technophile is not accusatorial and it is not a cartoonist if it is not a stemmer. sent2: the voicemail wires and it does destain kiang if the pet is not a kind of a Qum. sent3: if that the basketweaver is both not a Qum and not a jazz is wrong the pet is not a Qum. sent4: if the voicemail is a wire and it destains kiang the Malian does not destains kiang. sent5: the weathercock is a cartoonist. sent6: if there is something such that it does not destain kiang the blackbird is not elegiac and does not sound requiescat. sent7: if the self-heal is not Platonic that the technophile is a future but it is not Platonic is not right. sent8: the fact that something is both a stemmer and a clipper is not correct if it is non-elegiac. sent9: that the self-heal is accusatorial and is not Platonic is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the technophile is both future and not Platonic is not right then it is not a kind of a stemmer. sent11: if there exists something such that it destains camlet that the basketweaver is not a kind of a Qum and it is not a jazz is not correct. sent12: if the fact that something is a stemmer and it is a clipper is wrong then it is not future. sent13: the Sabahan is complete and/or is not Platonic if there are non-future things. sent14: the self-heal is not a kind of a binger if the fact that it is accusatorial and it is not a kind of a fireclay is not correct. sent15: if the self-heal is not a Ottoman the fact that the technophile is not accusatorial and it is not a cartoonist is incorrect. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it destains camlet is correct. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Ottoman is right. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a Ottoman the self-heal is both incomplete and not Platonic. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent18 -> int1: the self-heal is incomplete and is not Platonic.; int1 -> int2: the self-heal is non-Platonic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the technophile is not non-future but it is non-Platonic is wrong.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the technophile is not a stemmer.; int4 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__