there exists something such that it is a kind of a PIN.
sent1: the involucre is a Guaiacum if that the pot is ascomycetous but it is not a Guaiacum is not correct. sent2: if something that is a Guaiacum is not ascomycetous the pot is not a Carthaginian. sent3: the catwalk is not a PIN. sent4: there is something such that it does not pigment batik. sent5: that the pot is ascomycetous and it is a Guaiacum is not correct. sent6: if something that does reflectorize Zweig is not a kind of a Carthaginian then the involucre is not a Guaiacum. sent7: the fact that the pot is ascomycetous and is not a Guaiacum is not right. sent8: if that the black does reflectorize Zweig and is not Carthaginian does not hold the abacus is a PIN. sent9: if something is a Guaiacum then that it is a PIN but not a northeaster is not right. sent10: the black is ascomycetous if the fact that the pot does reflectorize Zweig and is not a Guaiacum is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the black does reflectorize Zweig and is non-Carthaginian.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it reflectorizes Zweig and is not a Carthaginian.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the involucre is not a Guaiacum is not false.; sent1 & sent7 -> int3: the involucre is a Guaiacum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the black does reflectorize Zweig but it is not Carthaginian does not hold.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the abacus is not a PIN is not correct.; int6 -> hypothesis;
that the tough is a PIN but it is not a northeaster is not true.
sent9 -> int7: that the tough is a kind of a PIN that is not a northeaster does not hold if it is a kind of a Guaiacum.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is a kind of a PIN. ; $context$ = sent1: the involucre is a Guaiacum if that the pot is ascomycetous but it is not a Guaiacum is not correct. sent2: if something that is a Guaiacum is not ascomycetous the pot is not a Carthaginian. sent3: the catwalk is not a PIN. sent4: there is something such that it does not pigment batik. sent5: that the pot is ascomycetous and it is a Guaiacum is not correct. sent6: if something that does reflectorize Zweig is not a kind of a Carthaginian then the involucre is not a Guaiacum. sent7: the fact that the pot is ascomycetous and is not a Guaiacum is not right. sent8: if that the black does reflectorize Zweig and is not Carthaginian does not hold the abacus is a PIN. sent9: if something is a Guaiacum then that it is a PIN but not a northeaster is not right. sent10: the black is ascomycetous if the fact that the pot does reflectorize Zweig and is not a Guaiacum is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the black does reflectorize Zweig and is non-Carthaginian.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it reflectorizes Zweig and is not a Carthaginian.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the involucre is not a Guaiacum is not false.; sent1 & sent7 -> int3: the involucre is a Guaiacum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the black does reflectorize Zweig but it is not Carthaginian does not hold.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the abacus is not a PIN is not correct.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__