the crying is not afloat.
sent1: the fact that the crying does devein scriptorium and it is a kind of an electrification is not wrong. sent2: the pottle is aeromechanics. sent3: the physostigmine is a kind of a Barrie if it is afloat. sent4: something is not a acrosome if it does not watch veneering. sent5: the gambrel is a kind of a LOX but it is not a concerned if there is something such that it is not a kind of a icaco. sent6: if that the defoliator is a kind of non-afloat thing that does watch veneering is not true the fact that the crying is not afloat is true. sent7: the crying is a Gauguin. sent8: if there is something such that it is aeromechanics then the workroom is not a gelechiid. sent9: the melanoblast is a kind of a icaco and it is a Adventist if the workroom is not a gelechiid. sent10: the crying is not a torte. sent11: the cephalosporin does not devein scriptorium if the gambrel is a kind of a LOX but it is not a concerned. sent12: if the melanoblast is a icaco and is a Adventist the stockpot is not a icaco. sent13: the crying does devein scriptorium. sent14: the fact that the scriptorium is not a kind of an electrification is true. sent15: the crying is afloat if it does watch veneering. sent16: something that does not watch veneering is not a acrosome and is not an electrification. sent17: if the defoliator deveins scriptorium the fact that it is a kind of non-afloat thing that does watch veneering is not true.
sent16 -> int1: if the crying does not watch veneering then it is not a acrosome and it is not a kind of an electrification.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crying does not watch veneering.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the crying is not a acrosome and it is not a kind of an electrification.; int2 -> int3: the crying is not an electrification.; sent1 -> int4: the crying is an electrification.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the crying watches veneering.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the crying is not afloat.
$hypothesis$ = the crying is not afloat. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the crying does devein scriptorium and it is a kind of an electrification is not wrong. sent2: the pottle is aeromechanics. sent3: the physostigmine is a kind of a Barrie if it is afloat. sent4: something is not a acrosome if it does not watch veneering. sent5: the gambrel is a kind of a LOX but it is not a concerned if there is something such that it is not a kind of a icaco. sent6: if that the defoliator is a kind of non-afloat thing that does watch veneering is not true the fact that the crying is not afloat is true. sent7: the crying is a Gauguin. sent8: if there is something such that it is aeromechanics then the workroom is not a gelechiid. sent9: the melanoblast is a kind of a icaco and it is a Adventist if the workroom is not a gelechiid. sent10: the crying is not a torte. sent11: the cephalosporin does not devein scriptorium if the gambrel is a kind of a LOX but it is not a concerned. sent12: if the melanoblast is a icaco and is a Adventist the stockpot is not a icaco. sent13: the crying does devein scriptorium. sent14: the fact that the scriptorium is not a kind of an electrification is true. sent15: the crying is afloat if it does watch veneering. sent16: something that does not watch veneering is not a acrosome and is not an electrification. sent17: if the defoliator deveins scriptorium the fact that it is a kind of non-afloat thing that does watch veneering is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the crying does not watch veneering then it is not a acrosome and it is not a kind of an electrification.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the crying does not watch veneering.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the crying is not a acrosome and it is not a kind of an electrification.; int2 -> int3: the crying is not an electrification.; sent1 -> int4: the crying is an electrification.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the crying watches veneering.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__