the consignment does not bypass stall and is a Donbass.
sent1: if the fact that the threat is air-to-surface is correct the consignment is a Donbass. sent2: if a chlorophyllose thing does bypass threat then the Kodiak is not an effigy. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does twine crowded and is not a jerky does not hold the consignment does not bypass stall. sent4: that the Mormons is not a reentry and is not a kind of a fungible is not right. sent5: if something is a kind of a fungible it is a reentry. sent6: if the Mormons does not recuperate then the threat is both not non-concretistic and periodontic. sent7: something is air-to-surface if it is a kind of a reentry. sent8: there exists something such that that it bypasses stall and it is not concretistic is not true. sent9: the fact that something is not periodontic but it is concretistic does not hold if it is not an effigy. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it does twine crowded and it is not a jerky is wrong. sent11: the consignment is non-air-to-surface. sent12: something is not chlorophyllose if that it is not an effigy and bypasses threat does not hold. sent13: if that the Kodiak is not periodontic but it is concretistic is false the fact that the threat does recuperate is right. sent14: the Mormons does not recuperate if that it is not a kind of a reentry and is not a fungible is incorrect. sent15: if there is something such that it is not air-to-surface the fact that the threat is not a reentry but it is air-to-surface is wrong. sent16: something is chlorophyllose and it does bypass threat. sent17: the Kodiak is an effigy but it is not chlorophyllose if the threat is not concretistic. sent18: that the stall does not bypass threat is not false if the Kodiak is an effigy but it is not chlorophyllose. sent19: something that recuperates is a fungible.
sent16 & sent2 -> int1: the Kodiak is not an effigy.; sent9 -> int2: that the fact that the Kodiak is not periodontic but it is concretistic hold is incorrect if it is not a kind of an effigy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Kodiak is not periodontic but it is concretistic is not true.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the threat does recuperate is not incorrect.; sent19 -> int5: if the threat recuperates it is a fungible.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the threat is a kind of a fungible.; sent5 -> int7: the threat is a kind of a reentry if it is a fungible.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the threat is a kind of a reentry hold.; sent7 -> int9: if the threat is a reentry then it is air-to-surface.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the threat is air-to-surface.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the consignment is a Donbass.; sent10 & sent3 -> int12: the consignment does not bypass stall.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the stall does not bypass threat.
sent11 -> int13: there is something such that it is not air-to-surface.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the fact that the threat is not a reentry but it is air-to-surface is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the consignment does not bypass stall and is a Donbass. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the threat is air-to-surface is correct the consignment is a Donbass. sent2: if a chlorophyllose thing does bypass threat then the Kodiak is not an effigy. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does twine crowded and is not a jerky does not hold the consignment does not bypass stall. sent4: that the Mormons is not a reentry and is not a kind of a fungible is not right. sent5: if something is a kind of a fungible it is a reentry. sent6: if the Mormons does not recuperate then the threat is both not non-concretistic and periodontic. sent7: something is air-to-surface if it is a kind of a reentry. sent8: there exists something such that that it bypasses stall and it is not concretistic is not true. sent9: the fact that something is not periodontic but it is concretistic does not hold if it is not an effigy. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it does twine crowded and it is not a jerky is wrong. sent11: the consignment is non-air-to-surface. sent12: something is not chlorophyllose if that it is not an effigy and bypasses threat does not hold. sent13: if that the Kodiak is not periodontic but it is concretistic is false the fact that the threat does recuperate is right. sent14: the Mormons does not recuperate if that it is not a kind of a reentry and is not a fungible is incorrect. sent15: if there is something such that it is not air-to-surface the fact that the threat is not a reentry but it is air-to-surface is wrong. sent16: something is chlorophyllose and it does bypass threat. sent17: the Kodiak is an effigy but it is not chlorophyllose if the threat is not concretistic. sent18: that the stall does not bypass threat is not false if the Kodiak is an effigy but it is not chlorophyllose. sent19: something that recuperates is a fungible. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent2 -> int1: the Kodiak is not an effigy.; sent9 -> int2: that the fact that the Kodiak is not periodontic but it is concretistic hold is incorrect if it is not a kind of an effigy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Kodiak is not periodontic but it is concretistic is not true.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the threat does recuperate is not incorrect.; sent19 -> int5: if the threat recuperates it is a fungible.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the threat is a kind of a fungible.; sent5 -> int7: the threat is a kind of a reentry if it is a fungible.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the threat is a kind of a reentry hold.; sent7 -> int9: if the threat is a reentry then it is air-to-surface.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the threat is air-to-surface.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the consignment is a Donbass.; sent10 & sent3 -> int12: the consignment does not bypass stall.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__