the Liederkranz does not bite.
sent1: the machete is not formalistic if there is something such that that it does substantiate and it does photosensitize hearts is not true. sent2: something is not a comparative and it is not calyculate if it does not photosensitize surfeit. sent3: if the Liederkranz is a Chlamyphorus but it is not a kind of a bit the gammon is a lisper. sent4: the gammon is not a lisper. sent5: if something does abdicate it is a silt and/or is not reparable. sent6: if the gammon is not a Chlamyphorus and it is not a lisper then that the Liederkranz is a bit is correct. sent7: if a comparative thing is calyculate then it does not bite. sent8: if something is legislative then it does abdicate. sent9: if something is not a bit then it does not guggle and it is not attributive. sent10: that the juror does substantiate and does photosensitize hearts is not true if it is not pictorial. sent11: if the fact that the layer is not a realty but a stain is not right that the juror is non-pictorial hold. sent12: everything is not a lisper. sent13: if the machete is not formalistic that it does not mingle and/or it is mensural is false. sent14: everything is not a Chlamyphorus and it is not a lisper. sent15: the fact that the layer is not a realty but it is a kind of a stain is not right. sent16: if either the catfish is a silt or it is not reparable or both then the surfeit does not photosensitize surfeit. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not mingle and/or is mensural is not right then the catfish is legislative.
sent14 -> int1: the gammon is not a Chlamyphorus and it is not a lisper.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the Liederkranz is not a bit.
sent2 -> int2: the fact that the surfeit is non-comparative and it is not calyculate hold if it does not photosensitize surfeit.; sent5 -> int3: if the catfish does abdicate then it is a silt or not reparable or both.; sent8 -> int4: if the catfish is not non-legislative it does abdicate.; sent11 & sent15 -> int5: the juror is not a kind of a pictorial.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the juror substantiates and it does photosensitize hearts is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it does substantiate and it photosensitizes hearts is incorrect.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the machete is not formalistic.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the fact that that the machete does not mingle and/or it is not non-mensural is not right is not incorrect.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it does not mingle or is mensural or both is not correct.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the catfish is legislative.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the catfish does abdicate.; int3 & int12 -> int13: the catfish is a silt or is not reparable or both.; sent16 & int13 -> int14: the surfeit does not photosensitize surfeit.; int2 & int14 -> int15: the surfeit is both not a comparative and not calyculate.; int15 -> int16: something is non-comparative and it is not calyculate.;
$hypothesis$ = the Liederkranz does not bite. ; $context$ = sent1: the machete is not formalistic if there is something such that that it does substantiate and it does photosensitize hearts is not true. sent2: something is not a comparative and it is not calyculate if it does not photosensitize surfeit. sent3: if the Liederkranz is a Chlamyphorus but it is not a kind of a bit the gammon is a lisper. sent4: the gammon is not a lisper. sent5: if something does abdicate it is a silt and/or is not reparable. sent6: if the gammon is not a Chlamyphorus and it is not a lisper then that the Liederkranz is a bit is correct. sent7: if a comparative thing is calyculate then it does not bite. sent8: if something is legislative then it does abdicate. sent9: if something is not a bit then it does not guggle and it is not attributive. sent10: that the juror does substantiate and does photosensitize hearts is not true if it is not pictorial. sent11: if the fact that the layer is not a realty but a stain is not right that the juror is non-pictorial hold. sent12: everything is not a lisper. sent13: if the machete is not formalistic that it does not mingle and/or it is mensural is false. sent14: everything is not a Chlamyphorus and it is not a lisper. sent15: the fact that the layer is not a realty but it is a kind of a stain is not right. sent16: if either the catfish is a silt or it is not reparable or both then the surfeit does not photosensitize surfeit. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not mingle and/or is mensural is not right then the catfish is legislative. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the gammon is not a Chlamyphorus and it is not a lisper.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__