something is not inertial and is not exacta.
sent1: if the actinopod bespangles forestry the baroness does not wet. sent2: if something is not a arachnoid then the fact that it bespangles Tussilago and it does not wet is false. sent3: the fact that the oak is not microbial is correct if it is a Coptic. sent4: something is not exacta if the fact that it bespangles Tussilago and it does not wet is incorrect. sent5: if the twistwood is non-arachnoid then the daredevil is not inertial. sent6: the fact that the baroness does not wet hold if the actinopod bespangles forestry or it is microbial or both. sent7: there exists something such that it is not exacta. sent8: if there is something such that it is not microbial and is inertial then the baroness is not a arachnoid. sent9: the oak is presocratic but it is not hiplength. sent10: if the twistwood is not a arachnoid then the daredevil is not inertial and it is not exacta. sent11: the baroness wets if the oak bespangles Tussilago. sent12: the fact that that something does not bespangle forestry or is specialistic or both hold is false if it is cyanobacterial. sent13: if the oak is presocratic thing that is not hiplength then it is a Coptic. sent14: if the fact that something does not bespangle forestry and/or is specialistic is not correct it is inertial. sent15: the fact that the twistwood is a arachnoid is not correct if the oak does not bespangle Tussilago.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oak bespangles Tussilago.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the baroness does wet.;
the baroness is not exacta.
sent2 -> int2: that the baroness bespangles Tussilago and is not wetting is not right if it is not arachnoid.; sent12 -> int3: the fact that either the twistwood does not bespangle forestry or it is specialistic or both does not hold if it is cyanobacterial.; sent14 -> int4: if that the oak does not bespangle forestry and/or it is specialistic does not hold the fact that it is inertial is not incorrect.; sent9 & sent13 -> int5: the oak is a Coptic.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the oak is not microbial.; sent4 -> int7: if that the baroness bespangles Tussilago and does not wet does not hold it is not exacta.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not inertial and is not exacta. ; $context$ = sent1: if the actinopod bespangles forestry the baroness does not wet. sent2: if something is not a arachnoid then the fact that it bespangles Tussilago and it does not wet is false. sent3: the fact that the oak is not microbial is correct if it is a Coptic. sent4: something is not exacta if the fact that it bespangles Tussilago and it does not wet is incorrect. sent5: if the twistwood is non-arachnoid then the daredevil is not inertial. sent6: the fact that the baroness does not wet hold if the actinopod bespangles forestry or it is microbial or both. sent7: there exists something such that it is not exacta. sent8: if there is something such that it is not microbial and is inertial then the baroness is not a arachnoid. sent9: the oak is presocratic but it is not hiplength. sent10: if the twistwood is not a arachnoid then the daredevil is not inertial and it is not exacta. sent11: the baroness wets if the oak bespangles Tussilago. sent12: the fact that that something does not bespangle forestry or is specialistic or both hold is false if it is cyanobacterial. sent13: if the oak is presocratic thing that is not hiplength then it is a Coptic. sent14: if the fact that something does not bespangle forestry and/or is specialistic is not correct it is inertial. sent15: the fact that the twistwood is a arachnoid is not correct if the oak does not bespangle Tussilago. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oak bespangles Tussilago.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the baroness does wet.; __UNKNOWN__