there exists something such that that it does not predate cragged and it is a Sno-cat does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a spiffing and it is a aorist hold. sent2: the flophouse does not squinch flophouse if that it is not tannic and/or is a spiffing is false. sent3: that that the flour is not a Sno-cat and/or it is a spiffing is not false is not correct. sent4: that the flour does not predate cragged but it is a Sno-cat is not right if the fact that something does not prioritize is right. sent5: if that the flour is a kind of a dissociation and/or it does not interest is not true it is a centrifuge. sent6: something does not squinch Planck. sent7: the flour is a aorist if the fact that it does not squinch Joyce and it is not calceolate is not correct. sent8: if something is a aorist the fact that it is not a kind of a Sno-cat and it does predate cragged is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that it does predate pilgrim. sent10: the flophouse does squinch flophouse and it is a aorist. sent11: if something is not tannic and/or it is a spiffing then it does not prioritize. sent12: the flophouse does not scout stereoscope if the flour does not scout stereoscope and does not prioritize. sent13: if there exists something such that that it does not prioritize is true then the fact that the flour predates cragged and it is a spiffing is not true. sent14: if something is not a Sno-cat then it is not a aorist. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Sno-cat the fact that the flour does prioritize and predates cragged is incorrect. sent16: the flour is not paleontological. sent17: the flour is a kind of a aorist. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is not a aorist and prioritizes does not hold. sent19: if that the flophouse does not predate cragged and/or it does prioritize is false it is not a spiffing. sent20: the flour is not faecal. sent21: if that either the flophouse predates cragged or it is a kind of a aorist or both is false it is not a kind of a spiffing. sent22: that something does not squinch Joyce and is not calceolate does not hold if that it does centrifuge is not incorrect. sent23: the stereoscope is not toneless if either it is not limbless or it prioritizes or both. sent24: if the flour is not faecal the fact that it is a dissociation or it does not interest or both is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the flophouse either is not tannic or is a kind of a spiffing or both is wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the flophouse does not squinch flophouse.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the flophouse does squinch flophouse hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the flophouse is not tannic and/or it is a spiffing.; sent11 -> int5: the flophouse does not prioritize if it either is not tannic or is a kind of a spiffing or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the flophouse does not prioritize.; int6 -> int7: something does not prioritize.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: that the flour does not predate cragged but it is a Sno-cat is not correct.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the flophouse does not scout stereoscope.
sent8 -> int9: if the flour is a aorist that it is not a Sno-cat and does predate cragged is not correct.; sent22 -> int10: that the flour does not squinch Joyce and it is not calceolate is not right if it is a centrifuge.; sent24 & sent20 -> int11: the fact that the flour is a dissociation and/or not an interest is wrong.; sent5 & int11 -> int12: the flour does centrifuge.; int10 & int12 -> int13: that the flour does not squinch Joyce and it is not calceolate is not correct.; sent7 & int13 -> int14: the flour is a aorist.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the fact that that the flour is not a kind of a Sno-cat and predates cragged is not true hold.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it does not predate cragged and it is a Sno-cat does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a spiffing and it is a aorist hold. sent2: the flophouse does not squinch flophouse if that it is not tannic and/or is a spiffing is false. sent3: that that the flour is not a Sno-cat and/or it is a spiffing is not false is not correct. sent4: that the flour does not predate cragged but it is a Sno-cat is not right if the fact that something does not prioritize is right. sent5: if that the flour is a kind of a dissociation and/or it does not interest is not true it is a centrifuge. sent6: something does not squinch Planck. sent7: the flour is a aorist if the fact that it does not squinch Joyce and it is not calceolate is not correct. sent8: if something is a aorist the fact that it is not a kind of a Sno-cat and it does predate cragged is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that it does predate pilgrim. sent10: the flophouse does squinch flophouse and it is a aorist. sent11: if something is not tannic and/or it is a spiffing then it does not prioritize. sent12: the flophouse does not scout stereoscope if the flour does not scout stereoscope and does not prioritize. sent13: if there exists something such that that it does not prioritize is true then the fact that the flour predates cragged and it is a spiffing is not true. sent14: if something is not a Sno-cat then it is not a aorist. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Sno-cat the fact that the flour does prioritize and predates cragged is incorrect. sent16: the flour is not paleontological. sent17: the flour is a kind of a aorist. sent18: there is something such that the fact that it is not a aorist and prioritizes does not hold. sent19: if that the flophouse does not predate cragged and/or it does prioritize is false it is not a spiffing. sent20: the flour is not faecal. sent21: if that either the flophouse predates cragged or it is a kind of a aorist or both is false it is not a kind of a spiffing. sent22: that something does not squinch Joyce and is not calceolate does not hold if that it does centrifuge is not incorrect. sent23: the stereoscope is not toneless if either it is not limbless or it prioritizes or both. sent24: if the flour is not faecal the fact that it is a dissociation or it does not interest or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the flophouse either is not tannic or is a kind of a spiffing or both is wrong.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the flophouse does not squinch flophouse.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the flophouse does squinch flophouse hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the flophouse is not tannic and/or it is a spiffing.; sent11 -> int5: the flophouse does not prioritize if it either is not tannic or is a kind of a spiffing or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the flophouse does not prioritize.; int6 -> int7: something does not prioritize.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: that the flour does not predate cragged but it is a Sno-cat is not correct.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__