there exists something such that if it uncorks manipulability then it is commodious.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Gladstone it is not a shrillness. sent2: something is incommodious if it uncorks manipulability. sent3: there is something such that if it uncorks manipulability it is incommodious. sent4: the shovelhead does not dilapidate clarification if it is a kind of an opinion. sent5: the shovelhead is not a kind of a queen if it is a follow-on. sent6: something is not a kind of a jurisprudence if it is a Abudefduf. sent7: that the shovelhead is incommodious hold if the fact that it does uncork manipulability hold.
there is something such that if it is a kind of a Abudefduf it is not a jurisprudence.
sent6 -> int1: the rival is not a jurisprudence if the fact that it is a Abudefduf hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it uncorks manipulability then it is commodious. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Gladstone it is not a shrillness. sent2: something is incommodious if it uncorks manipulability. sent3: there is something such that if it uncorks manipulability it is incommodious. sent4: the shovelhead does not dilapidate clarification if it is a kind of an opinion. sent5: the shovelhead is not a kind of a queen if it is a follow-on. sent6: something is not a kind of a jurisprudence if it is a Abudefduf. sent7: that the shovelhead is incommodious hold if the fact that it does uncork manipulability hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__