that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a humiliation and not a Sucre does not hold it is not usufructuary is not correct.
sent1: if the fact that the fact that the griseofulvin is not frivolous and it does not rice hobnailed is not true hold that it is non-arteriosclerotic hold. sent2: the griseofulvin is non-usufructuary if that it is not a humiliation and is a Sucre is false. sent3: that if that the Shiite is not polemoniaceous and not the Sucre does not hold then the Shiite does not charm bosom is true. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that that it is not a humiliation and is a Sucre is not wrong does not hold it is not a kind of a usufructuary. sent5: something is not anal if the fact that it is non-cytotoxic thing that does not snag Gibbon is not true. sent6: if the griseofulvin is a humiliation then it is not usufructuary. sent7: the griseofulvin is not usufructuary if it is not a kind of a humiliation and it is not a Sucre. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a humiliation and it is not a Sucre it is not a kind of a usufructuary. sent9: if the fact that something is not a humiliation but it is a Sucre is not true it is not usufructuary. sent10: something that is a humiliation is not a usufructuary. sent11: if that the quern does not mow and it is not a Sucre is not right it is not a fulcrum. sent12: if that something is not a humiliation and is not a Sucre does not hold then it is a usufructuary. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is not a humiliation and not a Sucre is incorrect then it is usufructuary. sent14: something is not usufructuary if it is not a humiliation and is not a Sucre. sent15: something is not a usufructuary if the fact that it is not a kind of a humiliation and it is not a kind of a Sucre is false. sent16: if that something is not crustose and it is not bracteate is false it does not charm arrowhead. sent17: if that the griseofulvin is not a humiliation and is not a Sucre is not right then the fact that it is usufructuary is correct. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a humiliation it is not usufructuary.
sent15 -> int1: if that the griseofulvin is not a humiliation and it is not a Sucre does not hold then it is not a usufructuary.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a humiliation and not a Sucre does not hold it is not usufructuary is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the fact that the griseofulvin is not frivolous and it does not rice hobnailed is not true hold that it is non-arteriosclerotic hold. sent2: the griseofulvin is non-usufructuary if that it is not a humiliation and is a Sucre is false. sent3: that if that the Shiite is not polemoniaceous and not the Sucre does not hold then the Shiite does not charm bosom is true. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that that it is not a humiliation and is a Sucre is not wrong does not hold it is not a kind of a usufructuary. sent5: something is not anal if the fact that it is non-cytotoxic thing that does not snag Gibbon is not true. sent6: if the griseofulvin is a humiliation then it is not usufructuary. sent7: the griseofulvin is not usufructuary if it is not a kind of a humiliation and it is not a Sucre. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a humiliation and it is not a Sucre it is not a kind of a usufructuary. sent9: if the fact that something is not a humiliation but it is a Sucre is not true it is not usufructuary. sent10: something that is a humiliation is not a usufructuary. sent11: if that the quern does not mow and it is not a Sucre is not right it is not a fulcrum. sent12: if that something is not a humiliation and is not a Sucre does not hold then it is a usufructuary. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is not a humiliation and not a Sucre is incorrect then it is usufructuary. sent14: something is not usufructuary if it is not a humiliation and is not a Sucre. sent15: something is not a usufructuary if the fact that it is not a kind of a humiliation and it is not a kind of a Sucre is false. sent16: if that something is not crustose and it is not bracteate is false it does not charm arrowhead. sent17: if that the griseofulvin is not a humiliation and is not a Sucre is not right then the fact that it is usufructuary is correct. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a humiliation it is not usufructuary. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if that the griseofulvin is not a humiliation and it is not a Sucre does not hold then it is not a usufructuary.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__