the planetesimal is not manorial.
sent1: something is a typification and afforests lee if it does not lean exabit. sent2: the maraca does lean exabit if it is non-pyrochemical thing that does not enfranchise Brotulidae. sent3: the fact that the cigarillo is both a diuretic and a vomit is right. sent4: the fact that the cigarillo enfranchises Brotulidae is not wrong if the maraca is a poor. sent5: that the dormer does vomit is true if it is a diuretic. sent6: the dormer enfranchises Brotulidae if it does not afforest Schistosomatidae and it is not pyrochemical. sent7: that the maraca does not enfranchise Brotulidae is correct. sent8: the dormer is a diuretic if the cigarillo is a poor. sent9: the dormer afforests Schistosomatidae. sent10: if that something afforests lee is right it is a typification. sent11: if the dormer is a vomit and it does afforest Schistosomatidae then the planetesimal is not manorial. sent12: the maraca is not pyrochemical and it does not enfranchise Brotulidae. sent13: if the maraca does not lean exabit the planetesimal is manorial and it does afforest lee. sent14: the maraca is a diuretic. sent15: if the maraca is non-pyrochemical thing that enfranchises Brotulidae then it leans exabit. sent16: the cigarillo afforests lee if the maraca does lean exabit. sent17: The Schistosomatidae afforests dormer. sent18: that the dormer is poor is correct. sent19: if something is a kind of a typification then it is a kind of a poor.
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the maraca leans exabit.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the cigarillo does afforest lee.; sent10 -> int3: if the cigarillo afforests lee then it is a typification.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cigarillo is a kind of a typification.; sent19 -> int5: if the cigarillo is a typification it is a poor.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the cigarillo is a poor is not wrong.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the dormer is a kind of a diuretic.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the dormer does vomit.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the dormer is a vomit and it afforests Schistosomatidae.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the planetesimal is manorial.
sent3 -> int10: the cigarillo is a diuretic.;
$hypothesis$ = the planetesimal is not manorial. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a typification and afforests lee if it does not lean exabit. sent2: the maraca does lean exabit if it is non-pyrochemical thing that does not enfranchise Brotulidae. sent3: the fact that the cigarillo is both a diuretic and a vomit is right. sent4: the fact that the cigarillo enfranchises Brotulidae is not wrong if the maraca is a poor. sent5: that the dormer does vomit is true if it is a diuretic. sent6: the dormer enfranchises Brotulidae if it does not afforest Schistosomatidae and it is not pyrochemical. sent7: that the maraca does not enfranchise Brotulidae is correct. sent8: the dormer is a diuretic if the cigarillo is a poor. sent9: the dormer afforests Schistosomatidae. sent10: if that something afforests lee is right it is a typification. sent11: if the dormer is a vomit and it does afforest Schistosomatidae then the planetesimal is not manorial. sent12: the maraca is not pyrochemical and it does not enfranchise Brotulidae. sent13: if the maraca does not lean exabit the planetesimal is manorial and it does afforest lee. sent14: the maraca is a diuretic. sent15: if the maraca is non-pyrochemical thing that enfranchises Brotulidae then it leans exabit. sent16: the cigarillo afforests lee if the maraca does lean exabit. sent17: The Schistosomatidae afforests dormer. sent18: that the dormer is poor is correct. sent19: if something is a kind of a typification then it is a kind of a poor. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent12 -> int1: the maraca leans exabit.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the cigarillo does afforest lee.; sent10 -> int3: if the cigarillo afforests lee then it is a typification.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cigarillo is a kind of a typification.; sent19 -> int5: if the cigarillo is a typification it is a poor.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the cigarillo is a poor is not wrong.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the dormer is a kind of a diuretic.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the dormer does vomit.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the dormer is a vomit and it afforests Schistosomatidae.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__