the elder is both melodic and a pantheist.
sent1: the fact that if the educator does negotiate tallness then the educator is a blennioid hold. sent2: either something is melodic or it is a kind of a landgrave or both. sent3: that the stimulant is a pantheist is not wrong. sent4: the stimulant does negotiate tallness if it is aerobic. sent5: the fagoting negotiates tallness and it is a penni if the stimulant is not pantheist. sent6: if the elder reports elder it is a pantheist. sent7: the elder is a Marley. sent8: if that something is a kind of a penni hold the stimulant is melodic. sent9: the sahib is a pantheist. sent10: the elder negotiates yodeller. sent11: the fact that something is a Joffre but it is not aerobic is not correct if it does negotiate tallness. sent12: if something negotiates tallness it is a kind of a Joffre. sent13: there is something such that either it is a kind of a tulipwood or it is dynastic or both. sent14: the stimulant is aerobic if it beholds fluorapatite. sent15: either the elder is a condition or it is a penni or both. sent16: there is something such that the fact that either it does sober or it beholds gaudy or both is true. sent17: there is something such that it is Jurassic or it is minus or both. sent18: if there is something such that it is on-the-job the elder negotiates tallness. sent19: that the stimulant negotiates habitability is not wrong. sent20: the llama is both unwelcome and a Silex. sent21: the fact that the stimulant is aerobic is not false. sent22: the elder is aerobic. sent23: if there is something such that it is a landgrave the elder is melodic. sent24: the stimulant is calycular. sent25: if something is a Joffre and/or it is a penni then the elder is a kind of a pantheist.
sent4 & sent21 -> int1: the stimulant does negotiate tallness.; sent12 -> int2: if the stimulant negotiates tallness then it is a Joffre.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stimulant is a Joffre.; int3 -> int4: the stimulant is a Joffre and/or it is a penni.; int4 -> int5: something is a kind of a Joffre and/or is a penni.; int5 & sent25 -> int6: the elder is not non-pantheist.;
the fact that the fagoting is aerobic is correct.
sent11 -> int7: if the fagoting negotiates tallness then the fact that it is a kind of a Joffre and it is not aerobic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the elder is both melodic and a pantheist. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the educator does negotiate tallness then the educator is a blennioid hold. sent2: either something is melodic or it is a kind of a landgrave or both. sent3: that the stimulant is a pantheist is not wrong. sent4: the stimulant does negotiate tallness if it is aerobic. sent5: the fagoting negotiates tallness and it is a penni if the stimulant is not pantheist. sent6: if the elder reports elder it is a pantheist. sent7: the elder is a Marley. sent8: if that something is a kind of a penni hold the stimulant is melodic. sent9: the sahib is a pantheist. sent10: the elder negotiates yodeller. sent11: the fact that something is a Joffre but it is not aerobic is not correct if it does negotiate tallness. sent12: if something negotiates tallness it is a kind of a Joffre. sent13: there is something such that either it is a kind of a tulipwood or it is dynastic or both. sent14: the stimulant is aerobic if it beholds fluorapatite. sent15: either the elder is a condition or it is a penni or both. sent16: there is something such that the fact that either it does sober or it beholds gaudy or both is true. sent17: there is something such that it is Jurassic or it is minus or both. sent18: if there is something such that it is on-the-job the elder negotiates tallness. sent19: that the stimulant negotiates habitability is not wrong. sent20: the llama is both unwelcome and a Silex. sent21: the fact that the stimulant is aerobic is not false. sent22: the elder is aerobic. sent23: if there is something such that it is a landgrave the elder is melodic. sent24: the stimulant is calycular. sent25: if something is a Joffre and/or it is a penni then the elder is a kind of a pantheist. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent21 -> int1: the stimulant does negotiate tallness.; sent12 -> int2: if the stimulant negotiates tallness then it is a Joffre.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stimulant is a Joffre.; int3 -> int4: the stimulant is a Joffre and/or it is a penni.; int4 -> int5: something is a kind of a Joffre and/or is a penni.; int5 & sent25 -> int6: the elder is not non-pantheist.; __UNKNOWN__