the respecting radiotelephone but not the spreading Pyrophorus occurs.
sent1: if the brooming happens then the spreading plumber does not occur but the unattractiveness happens. sent2: the telepathizing happens and the assassination occurs. sent3: the septalness happens. sent4: the top-downness does not occur. sent5: if that the spreading plumber does not occur is correct the respecting radiotelephone occurs and the unattractiveness happens. sent6: the broom occurs and the spreading plumber does not occur. sent7: the azimuthalness occurs. sent8: that the parotidness happens and/or the redress does not occur is wrong if the azimuthalness occurs. sent9: either the parotidness happens or the redress does not occur or both if the spreading Pyrophorus occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spreading Pyrophorus happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the parotidness occurs and/or the redress does not occur.; sent8 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the parotidness occurs and/or the redress does not occur does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the spreading Pyrophorus does not occur hold.; sent6 -> int5: the spreading plumber does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the respecting radiotelephone occurs and the unattractiveness happens.; int6 -> int7: the respecting radiotelephone happens.; int4 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the respecting radiotelephone happens but the spreading Pyrophorus does not occur is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the respecting radiotelephone but not the spreading Pyrophorus occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the brooming happens then the spreading plumber does not occur but the unattractiveness happens. sent2: the telepathizing happens and the assassination occurs. sent3: the septalness happens. sent4: the top-downness does not occur. sent5: if that the spreading plumber does not occur is correct the respecting radiotelephone occurs and the unattractiveness happens. sent6: the broom occurs and the spreading plumber does not occur. sent7: the azimuthalness occurs. sent8: that the parotidness happens and/or the redress does not occur is wrong if the azimuthalness occurs. sent9: either the parotidness happens or the redress does not occur or both if the spreading Pyrophorus occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spreading Pyrophorus happens.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the parotidness occurs and/or the redress does not occur.; sent8 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the parotidness occurs and/or the redress does not occur does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the spreading Pyrophorus does not occur hold.; sent6 -> int5: the spreading plumber does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the respecting radiotelephone occurs and the unattractiveness happens.; int6 -> int7: the respecting radiotelephone happens.; int4 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__