the emendation does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the immunization happens and the compelling kanzu does not occur does not hold. sent2: the scenting commissure occurs. sent3: the scenting lansoprazole happens. sent4: if the stealing does not occur and the resection does not occur that the mortalness does not occur is right. sent5: the non-internationalness and the non-photoelectricness occurs. sent6: that the emendation does not occur is prevented by that the mortalness does not occur but the scenting commissure occurs. sent7: that both the mortalness and the scenting commissure occurs is caused by the non-bibliopolicness. sent8: the servicing malignancy occurs. sent9: if the sunning but not the typification occurs the bibliopolicness does not occur. sent10: the compelling nephropathy happens. sent11: if the murine does not occur and the beam does not occur the caulineness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the ontogeneticness does not occur and the sunning does not occur is not true if the enfranchisement happens. sent13: the stealing does not occur. sent14: if the resection happens the fact that not the immunization but the compelling kanzu occurs is wrong. sent15: the reasonableness does not occur. sent16: that the firelight does not occur and the typification does not occur is not wrong. sent17: that the immunization does not occur and the compelling kanzu does not occur is not true if the resection happens. sent18: the immunization does not occur and the compelling kanzu does not occur. sent19: if the gesticulating occurs the sun happens but the typification does not occur. sent20: the fact that not the immunization but the compelling kanzu happens is not right. sent21: if the resection happens then the fact that the immunization happens but the compelling kanzu does not occur is not right. sent22: the intensiveness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the resection occurs.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the immunization does not occur and the compelling kanzu does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the resection does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the steal does not occur and the resection does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the mortalness does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the mortalness does not occur and the scenting commissure occurs.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the emendation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the emendation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the immunization happens and the compelling kanzu does not occur does not hold. sent2: the scenting commissure occurs. sent3: the scenting lansoprazole happens. sent4: if the stealing does not occur and the resection does not occur that the mortalness does not occur is right. sent5: the non-internationalness and the non-photoelectricness occurs. sent6: that the emendation does not occur is prevented by that the mortalness does not occur but the scenting commissure occurs. sent7: that both the mortalness and the scenting commissure occurs is caused by the non-bibliopolicness. sent8: the servicing malignancy occurs. sent9: if the sunning but not the typification occurs the bibliopolicness does not occur. sent10: the compelling nephropathy happens. sent11: if the murine does not occur and the beam does not occur the caulineness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the ontogeneticness does not occur and the sunning does not occur is not true if the enfranchisement happens. sent13: the stealing does not occur. sent14: if the resection happens the fact that not the immunization but the compelling kanzu occurs is wrong. sent15: the reasonableness does not occur. sent16: that the firelight does not occur and the typification does not occur is not wrong. sent17: that the immunization does not occur and the compelling kanzu does not occur is not true if the resection happens. sent18: the immunization does not occur and the compelling kanzu does not occur. sent19: if the gesticulating occurs the sun happens but the typification does not occur. sent20: the fact that not the immunization but the compelling kanzu happens is not right. sent21: if the resection happens then the fact that the immunization happens but the compelling kanzu does not occur is not right. sent22: the intensiveness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the resection occurs.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the immunization does not occur and the compelling kanzu does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the resection does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the steal does not occur and the resection does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the mortalness does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the mortalness does not occur and the scenting commissure occurs.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__