the calico does not deviate.
sent1: the calico does not brief cabaret if something does not brief cabaret. sent2: the calico is a stylite. sent3: the fact that something does not mangle one-third and it is not a tender does not hold if it is not a kind of a davallia. sent4: the fact that the zapper is not a kind of a davallia is correct if the demographer is stimulative but it is not a pinhead. sent5: if something does not brief cabaret but it incorporates calico then it deviates. sent6: the Pantaloon is a pinhead but it is not orthodontic if the demographer is not stimulative. sent7: the demographer is not stimulative if the zapper does mangle one-third and/or is a davallia. sent8: the woodenware tenders. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it does brief cabaret and is not a kind of a minuscule is wrong the calico does not brief cabaret. sent10: the calico does incorporate calico if the Pantaloon is a pinhead that is not orthodontic. sent11: that the androecium briefs cabaret but it is not a minuscule does not hold. sent12: something does mangle one-third if the fact that it is non-priming thing that is a stylite is wrong. sent13: the woodenware does deviate. sent14: the calico is orthodontic. sent15: if that something mangles one-third and does incorporate calico does not hold then it does not incorporate calico. sent16: if the woodenware does deviate but it is not tender then the calico does not deviate. sent17: if the woodenware is tender that the zapper is a kind of non-priming thing that is a kind of a stylite is not right.
sent17 & sent8 -> int1: that the zapper is non-priming but it is a stylite is not true.; sent12 -> int2: the zapper mangles one-third if the fact that it is not a priming but a stylite is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the zapper mangles one-third.; int3 -> int4: the zapper does mangle one-third and/or is a davallia.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the demographer is not stimulative.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the Pantaloon is both a pinhead and not orthodontic.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the calico does incorporate calico.; sent11 -> int8: that there exists something such that the fact that it does brief cabaret and is not a minuscule is not true is right.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the calico does not brief cabaret.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the calico does not brief cabaret but it does incorporate calico.; sent5 -> int11: if the calico does not brief cabaret and does incorporate calico then it deviates.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the calico does not deviate.
sent3 -> int12: if the fact that the zapper is not a davallia is right then that it does not mangle one-third and does not tender is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the calico does not deviate. ; $context$ = sent1: the calico does not brief cabaret if something does not brief cabaret. sent2: the calico is a stylite. sent3: the fact that something does not mangle one-third and it is not a tender does not hold if it is not a kind of a davallia. sent4: the fact that the zapper is not a kind of a davallia is correct if the demographer is stimulative but it is not a pinhead. sent5: if something does not brief cabaret but it incorporates calico then it deviates. sent6: the Pantaloon is a pinhead but it is not orthodontic if the demographer is not stimulative. sent7: the demographer is not stimulative if the zapper does mangle one-third and/or is a davallia. sent8: the woodenware tenders. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it does brief cabaret and is not a kind of a minuscule is wrong the calico does not brief cabaret. sent10: the calico does incorporate calico if the Pantaloon is a pinhead that is not orthodontic. sent11: that the androecium briefs cabaret but it is not a minuscule does not hold. sent12: something does mangle one-third if the fact that it is non-priming thing that is a stylite is wrong. sent13: the woodenware does deviate. sent14: the calico is orthodontic. sent15: if that something mangles one-third and does incorporate calico does not hold then it does not incorporate calico. sent16: if the woodenware does deviate but it is not tender then the calico does not deviate. sent17: if the woodenware is tender that the zapper is a kind of non-priming thing that is a kind of a stylite is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent8 -> int1: that the zapper is non-priming but it is a stylite is not true.; sent12 -> int2: the zapper mangles one-third if the fact that it is not a priming but a stylite is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the zapper mangles one-third.; int3 -> int4: the zapper does mangle one-third and/or is a davallia.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the demographer is not stimulative.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the Pantaloon is both a pinhead and not orthodontic.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the calico does incorporate calico.; sent11 -> int8: that there exists something such that the fact that it does brief cabaret and is not a minuscule is not true is right.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the calico does not brief cabaret.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the calico does not brief cabaret but it does incorporate calico.; sent5 -> int11: if the calico does not brief cabaret and does incorporate calico then it deviates.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__