the fact that the intrusion is not a chemist is not wrong.
sent1: the fact that the worm does not single lidar hold if the windbreak is not a handloom. sent2: if the worm is not a anthologist and/or it swaps crystallography then the windbreak is a anthologist. sent3: something is not a chemist if that it is a chemist and it does not swap crystallography is incorrect. sent4: the worm swaps crystallography and is a kind of an emulsion. sent5: the worm does not single lidar. sent6: the fact that either the worm does not swap Ebro or it singles lidar or both does not hold if the windbreak is not a handloom. sent7: the worm is a kind of an emulsion. sent8: if there exists something such that either it is a sulla or it is a handloom or both then the intrusion is a chemist. sent9: if the fact that something does not swap Ebro or it singles lidar or both is not true it does not swap crystallography. sent10: if there is something such that it is a sulla then the fact that the intrusion is a chemist hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the windbreak is not a handloom.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the worm does not swap Ebro and/or it does single lidar does not hold.; sent9 -> int2: if that the worm does not swap Ebro and/or singles lidar is not correct then it does not swap crystallography.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the worm does not swap crystallography.; sent4 -> int4: the worm does swap crystallography.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the windbreak is a kind of a handloom.; int6 -> int7: the windbreak is a sulla and/or is a handloom.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is a sulla or it is a handloom or both.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the intrusion is not a chemist.
sent3 -> int9: if that the intrusion is a chemist but it does not swap crystallography is not correct it is not a chemist.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the intrusion is not a chemist is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the worm does not single lidar hold if the windbreak is not a handloom. sent2: if the worm is not a anthologist and/or it swaps crystallography then the windbreak is a anthologist. sent3: something is not a chemist if that it is a chemist and it does not swap crystallography is incorrect. sent4: the worm swaps crystallography and is a kind of an emulsion. sent5: the worm does not single lidar. sent6: the fact that either the worm does not swap Ebro or it singles lidar or both does not hold if the windbreak is not a handloom. sent7: the worm is a kind of an emulsion. sent8: if there exists something such that either it is a sulla or it is a handloom or both then the intrusion is a chemist. sent9: if the fact that something does not swap Ebro or it singles lidar or both is not true it does not swap crystallography. sent10: if there is something such that it is a sulla then the fact that the intrusion is a chemist hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the windbreak is not a handloom.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the worm does not swap Ebro and/or it does single lidar does not hold.; sent9 -> int2: if that the worm does not swap Ebro and/or singles lidar is not correct then it does not swap crystallography.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the worm does not swap crystallography.; sent4 -> int4: the worm does swap crystallography.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the windbreak is a kind of a handloom.; int6 -> int7: the windbreak is a sulla and/or is a handloom.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is a sulla or it is a handloom or both.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__