the monkey reflectorizes accusative.
sent1: if the distiller does sheer tradeoff and does not draw Orlon then it is not a riposte. sent2: something sheers tradeoff but it does not draw Orlon. sent3: if the distiller is not micrometeoric then that the monkey is a kind of a substitute and it is a kind of an antibacterial is not right. sent4: that something is micrometeoric but it is not an overabundance is false if it is a gradual. sent5: the monkey does reflectorize accusative if there exists something such that the fact that it sheers tradeoff and it does not draw Orlon does not hold. sent6: something does not reflectorize accusative and does not draw Kern if the fact that it does not riposte is right. sent7: the blinker does not reflectorize carbonated. sent8: a erythroid thing is a gradual. sent9: if the Kern is a substitute the taxidermist is a substitute. sent10: the distiller does not draw Orlon. sent11: if there is something such that it does not reflectorize carbonated the distiller is erythroid or it is nosohusial or both. sent12: if that the distiller is not a riposte is not wrong the blinker does draw Kern. sent13: if something does draw Orlon then the monkey reflectorizes accusative. sent14: that something is an antibacterial and/or it does not draw Kern is not right if it is a kind of a substitute. sent15: the taxidermist is not an antibacterial. sent16: the monkey does reflectorize accusative if the distiller reflectorize accusative. sent17: the fact that the distiller sheers tradeoff and draws Orlon does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that that it does sheer tradeoff and does draw Orlon is incorrect. sent19: something is not a kind of an antibacterial if it does substitute. sent20: if that the distiller is micrometeoric but it is not an overabundance is wrong then it is not micrometeoric. sent21: the distiller is not a riposte if it does sheer tradeoff and it does draw Orlon. sent22: if the fact that the Kern does draw Orlon is not false the distiller does draw Orlon. sent23: the taxidermist sheers tradeoff. sent24: that the Kern is both not a substitute and not an overabundance does not hold. sent25: that the Kern is a substitute that is not an overabundance is not right. sent26: the taxidermist is not an antibacterial if it does substitute. sent27: the Kern does substitute if the fact that it is not a substitute and it is not an overabundance is not correct. sent28: if the blinker draws Kern then the taxidermist is antibacterial and/or does not draws Kern.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the distiller does sheer tradeoff but it does not draw Orlon.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the distiller is not a riposte.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the blinker does draw Kern.; int2 & sent28 -> int3: the taxidermist is antibacterial and/or does not draw Kern.; sent14 -> int4: if the taxidermist does substitute that it either is antibacterial or does not draw Kern or both is not true.; sent27 & sent24 -> int5: the Kern is a substitute.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the taxidermist is a kind of a substitute.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that either the taxidermist is a kind of an antibacterial or it does not draw Kern or both does not hold.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the distiller sheers tradeoff and does not draw Orlon is wrong.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it does sheer tradeoff and it does not draw Orlon is false.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the monkey does not reflectorize accusative is not incorrect.
sent6 -> int11: the monkey does not reflectorize accusative and does not draw Kern if it is not a riposte.; sent4 -> int12: if the distiller is a kind of a gradual the fact that it is micrometeoric and not an overabundance is not true.; sent7 -> int13: there is something such that that it does not reflectorize carbonated is not false.; int13 & sent11 -> int14: the distiller is either erythroid or nosohusial or both.; sent8 -> int15: that the distiller is gradual is correct if it is erythroid.;
$hypothesis$ = the monkey reflectorizes accusative. ; $context$ = sent1: if the distiller does sheer tradeoff and does not draw Orlon then it is not a riposte. sent2: something sheers tradeoff but it does not draw Orlon. sent3: if the distiller is not micrometeoric then that the monkey is a kind of a substitute and it is a kind of an antibacterial is not right. sent4: that something is micrometeoric but it is not an overabundance is false if it is a gradual. sent5: the monkey does reflectorize accusative if there exists something such that the fact that it sheers tradeoff and it does not draw Orlon does not hold. sent6: something does not reflectorize accusative and does not draw Kern if the fact that it does not riposte is right. sent7: the blinker does not reflectorize carbonated. sent8: a erythroid thing is a gradual. sent9: if the Kern is a substitute the taxidermist is a substitute. sent10: the distiller does not draw Orlon. sent11: if there is something such that it does not reflectorize carbonated the distiller is erythroid or it is nosohusial or both. sent12: if that the distiller is not a riposte is not wrong the blinker does draw Kern. sent13: if something does draw Orlon then the monkey reflectorizes accusative. sent14: that something is an antibacterial and/or it does not draw Kern is not right if it is a kind of a substitute. sent15: the taxidermist is not an antibacterial. sent16: the monkey does reflectorize accusative if the distiller reflectorize accusative. sent17: the fact that the distiller sheers tradeoff and draws Orlon does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that that it does sheer tradeoff and does draw Orlon is incorrect. sent19: something is not a kind of an antibacterial if it does substitute. sent20: if that the distiller is micrometeoric but it is not an overabundance is wrong then it is not micrometeoric. sent21: the distiller is not a riposte if it does sheer tradeoff and it does draw Orlon. sent22: if the fact that the Kern does draw Orlon is not false the distiller does draw Orlon. sent23: the taxidermist sheers tradeoff. sent24: that the Kern is both not a substitute and not an overabundance does not hold. sent25: that the Kern is a substitute that is not an overabundance is not right. sent26: the taxidermist is not an antibacterial if it does substitute. sent27: the Kern does substitute if the fact that it is not a substitute and it is not an overabundance is not correct. sent28: if the blinker draws Kern then the taxidermist is antibacterial and/or does not draws Kern. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the distiller does sheer tradeoff but it does not draw Orlon.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the distiller is not a riposte.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the blinker does draw Kern.; int2 & sent28 -> int3: the taxidermist is antibacterial and/or does not draw Kern.; sent14 -> int4: if the taxidermist does substitute that it either is antibacterial or does not draw Kern or both is not true.; sent27 & sent24 -> int5: the Kern is a substitute.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the taxidermist is a kind of a substitute.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that either the taxidermist is a kind of an antibacterial or it does not draw Kern or both does not hold.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the distiller sheers tradeoff and does not draw Orlon is wrong.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it does sheer tradeoff and it does not draw Orlon is false.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__