that the inventory is not a maxi and does not crank device does not hold.
sent1: something that is a reptile is maxi. sent2: the recognition is not a wear. sent3: the inventory fools cheerleader. sent4: if something does blur then it does relive. sent5: if the recognition is not a kind of a wear then that it does fool cheerleader and is not eugenics does not hold. sent6: that that the inventory is a kind of non-maxi thing that does not crank device does not hold is not wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it does relive is not false. sent7: the fact that the handwear is not extroversive and not eugenics is not true if there is something such that it is not non-allomorphic. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it does fool cheerleader and is not eugenics does not hold then the sildenafil is a reptile. sent9: that the inventory does relive is right if it does talk snifter. sent10: the fact that the inventory is a maxi and does not crank device does not hold. sent11: there is something such that that that it does fool cheerleader and it is a wear is not false is not correct. sent12: the fact that the recognition is both a maxi and not a reptile is false if something fools cheerleader. sent13: if there is something such that that it does wear and is not a reptile does not hold the sildenafil fools cheerleader. sent14: something is not a kind of a maxi if it wears and it is not a reptile. sent15: if the sildenafil does not fool cheerleader that it is both a blur and not eugenics is not right. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it fools cheerleader and it is eugenics does not hold. sent17: the fact that the inventory is not maxi but it cranks device is not true if something does relive. sent18: that the recognition fools cheerleader and is eugenics is wrong. sent19: if the inventory cranks device then it is a reptile. sent20: that the recognition is a kind of eugenics thing that does not relive does not hold. sent21: that the recognition is a kind of a blur but it does not blame silva is not correct. sent22: if something is a reptile it does blur. sent23: that the sildenafil is a reptile but it does not crank device does not hold. sent24: something is a gluteus if it communes.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the recognition does fool cheerleader but it is not eugenics does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does fool cheerleader and is not eugenics is not right.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the sildenafil is a reptile.; sent22 -> int4: the sildenafil is a blur if it is a reptile.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sildenafil does blur.; sent4 -> int6: the sildenafil does relive if the fact that it is a kind of a blur is right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sildenafil does relive.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it relives.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the inventory is not a maxi and does not crank device.
sent14 -> int9: the inventory is not maxi if it is a kind of a wear that is not a reptile.;
$hypothesis$ = that the inventory is not a maxi and does not crank device does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is a reptile is maxi. sent2: the recognition is not a wear. sent3: the inventory fools cheerleader. sent4: if something does blur then it does relive. sent5: if the recognition is not a kind of a wear then that it does fool cheerleader and is not eugenics does not hold. sent6: that that the inventory is a kind of non-maxi thing that does not crank device does not hold is not wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it does relive is not false. sent7: the fact that the handwear is not extroversive and not eugenics is not true if there is something such that it is not non-allomorphic. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it does fool cheerleader and is not eugenics does not hold then the sildenafil is a reptile. sent9: that the inventory does relive is right if it does talk snifter. sent10: the fact that the inventory is a maxi and does not crank device does not hold. sent11: there is something such that that that it does fool cheerleader and it is a wear is not false is not correct. sent12: the fact that the recognition is both a maxi and not a reptile is false if something fools cheerleader. sent13: if there is something such that that it does wear and is not a reptile does not hold the sildenafil fools cheerleader. sent14: something is not a kind of a maxi if it wears and it is not a reptile. sent15: if the sildenafil does not fool cheerleader that it is both a blur and not eugenics is not right. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it fools cheerleader and it is eugenics does not hold. sent17: the fact that the inventory is not maxi but it cranks device is not true if something does relive. sent18: that the recognition fools cheerleader and is eugenics is wrong. sent19: if the inventory cranks device then it is a reptile. sent20: that the recognition is a kind of eugenics thing that does not relive does not hold. sent21: that the recognition is a kind of a blur but it does not blame silva is not correct. sent22: if something is a reptile it does blur. sent23: that the sildenafil is a reptile but it does not crank device does not hold. sent24: something is a gluteus if it communes. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the recognition does fool cheerleader but it is not eugenics does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does fool cheerleader and is not eugenics is not right.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the sildenafil is a reptile.; sent22 -> int4: the sildenafil is a blur if it is a reptile.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sildenafil does blur.; sent4 -> int6: the sildenafil does relive if the fact that it is a kind of a blur is right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sildenafil does relive.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it relives.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__