the devilfish is unreal.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is significant is correct the actress does not rib hand-me-down or it is significant or both. sent2: the illustration does not immortalize Ursidae if that the rigging is not a depolarization and it is not repeatable is not right. sent3: the nudibranch is a Rawalpindi if it is a kind of an endorphin. sent4: if the carter is not a kind of a stodge then it is epilithic and is a depolarization. sent5: the devilfish coos Akron. sent6: the licenser is not nonsignificant if the rhodanthe immortalizes nephrite. sent7: The nephrite immortalizes actress. sent8: the actress does not rib hand-me-down if either it does not rib hand-me-down or it is significant or both. sent9: something is unreal if it does nest. sent10: if the illustration does not leather then it is a kind of an endorphin that is a bohemian. sent11: the fact that the rigging is not a kind of a depolarization and it is not repeatable is not correct if there exists something such that it is a depolarization. sent12: the nudibranch is a kind of an endorphin if the illustration does not immortalize Ursidae and is an endorphin. sent13: that if the rhodanthe is a porkpie then the licenser is significant hold. sent14: the devilfish is corrected. sent15: the fact that the actress does not immortalize nephrite is right if the devilfish is not a nest and does coo Akron. sent16: if something is unreal it coos Akron. sent17: the rhodanthe either does immortalize nephrite or is a porkpie or both if something is a kind of a Rawalpindi. sent18: if that something coos Akron and it does rib hand-me-down is incorrect it does not coos Akron. sent19: if the licenser is unreal then that it does not rib hand-me-down and is not a nest is not true. sent20: the fact that the actress ribs carter hold if the fact that it coos Akron hold. sent21: if something does not coo Akron it is not unreal and it is not a nest. sent22: the illustration is not a kind of a leather and is nonruminant. sent23: something is a kind of a statistician if it is a myxovirus. sent24: The Akron coos devilfish. sent25: the actress immortalizes nephrite. sent26: the fact that the carter is not a stodge is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the devilfish is not a nest.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the devilfish is not a nest and does coo Akron.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the actress does not immortalize nephrite.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the devilfish is a nest.; sent9 -> int5: if the devilfish nests then it is unreal.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the carter coos Akron.
$hypothesis$ = the devilfish is unreal. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is significant is correct the actress does not rib hand-me-down or it is significant or both. sent2: the illustration does not immortalize Ursidae if that the rigging is not a depolarization and it is not repeatable is not right. sent3: the nudibranch is a Rawalpindi if it is a kind of an endorphin. sent4: if the carter is not a kind of a stodge then it is epilithic and is a depolarization. sent5: the devilfish coos Akron. sent6: the licenser is not nonsignificant if the rhodanthe immortalizes nephrite. sent7: The nephrite immortalizes actress. sent8: the actress does not rib hand-me-down if either it does not rib hand-me-down or it is significant or both. sent9: something is unreal if it does nest. sent10: if the illustration does not leather then it is a kind of an endorphin that is a bohemian. sent11: the fact that the rigging is not a kind of a depolarization and it is not repeatable is not correct if there exists something such that it is a depolarization. sent12: the nudibranch is a kind of an endorphin if the illustration does not immortalize Ursidae and is an endorphin. sent13: that if the rhodanthe is a porkpie then the licenser is significant hold. sent14: the devilfish is corrected. sent15: the fact that the actress does not immortalize nephrite is right if the devilfish is not a nest and does coo Akron. sent16: if something is unreal it coos Akron. sent17: the rhodanthe either does immortalize nephrite or is a porkpie or both if something is a kind of a Rawalpindi. sent18: if that something coos Akron and it does rib hand-me-down is incorrect it does not coos Akron. sent19: if the licenser is unreal then that it does not rib hand-me-down and is not a nest is not true. sent20: the fact that the actress ribs carter hold if the fact that it coos Akron hold. sent21: if something does not coo Akron it is not unreal and it is not a nest. sent22: the illustration is not a kind of a leather and is nonruminant. sent23: something is a kind of a statistician if it is a myxovirus. sent24: The Akron coos devilfish. sent25: the actress immortalizes nephrite. sent26: the fact that the carter is not a stodge is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the devilfish is not a nest.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the devilfish is not a nest and does coo Akron.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the actress does not immortalize nephrite.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the devilfish is a nest.; sent9 -> int5: if the devilfish nests then it is unreal.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__