the fact that the brutality does not occur and the alphanumericsness does not occur is false.
sent1: that the tourism does not occur is prevented by the ceramicness. sent2: the sustainableness happens if the coinciding occurs. sent3: the meaningfulness does not occur. sent4: the radialness happens if the stowing Murrow does not occur. sent5: if the ceramic does not occur the scuffling happens. sent6: both the scuffling and the coinciding happens if the ceramicness does not occur. sent7: if the sustainableness occurs that the brutality does not occur and the alphanumericsness does not occur does not hold. sent8: the embrowning liquidator occurs. sent9: the tourism does not occur if the meaningfulness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ceramicness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the tourism occurs.; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: the tourism does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ceramicness does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the scuffling occurs and the coinciding happens.; int5 -> int6: the coinciding happens.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the sustainableness occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the brutality does not occur and the alphanumericsness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tourism does not occur is prevented by the ceramicness. sent2: the sustainableness happens if the coinciding occurs. sent3: the meaningfulness does not occur. sent4: the radialness happens if the stowing Murrow does not occur. sent5: if the ceramic does not occur the scuffling happens. sent6: both the scuffling and the coinciding happens if the ceramicness does not occur. sent7: if the sustainableness occurs that the brutality does not occur and the alphanumericsness does not occur does not hold. sent8: the embrowning liquidator occurs. sent9: the tourism does not occur if the meaningfulness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ceramicness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the tourism occurs.; sent9 & sent3 -> int2: the tourism does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ceramicness does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the scuffling occurs and the coinciding happens.; int5 -> int6: the coinciding happens.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the sustainableness occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__