the Ionicness does not occur if the demineralizing cytologist does not occur.
sent1: if the Ionicness happens the fact that not the demineralizing cytologist but the malpractice occurs is wrong. sent2: if the amphibiousness happens the Ionicness occurs. sent3: the malpractice does not occur if the fact that not the demineralizing cytologist but the malpractice happens is not correct. sent4: the fact that the logrolling happens and the indexlessness happens is wrong if the demineralizing cytologist does not occur. sent5: the amphibiousness and the repechage occurs if the pinochle does not occur. sent6: the pinochle does not occur if that the Argive happens and the pinochle occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demineralizing cytologist does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that both the logrolling and the indexlessness happens is wrong.;
the malpractice does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Ionicness does not occur if the demineralizing cytologist does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Ionicness happens the fact that not the demineralizing cytologist but the malpractice occurs is wrong. sent2: if the amphibiousness happens the Ionicness occurs. sent3: the malpractice does not occur if the fact that not the demineralizing cytologist but the malpractice happens is not correct. sent4: the fact that the logrolling happens and the indexlessness happens is wrong if the demineralizing cytologist does not occur. sent5: the amphibiousness and the repechage occurs if the pinochle does not occur. sent6: the pinochle does not occur if that the Argive happens and the pinochle occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demineralizing cytologist does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that both the logrolling and the indexlessness happens is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__