that the ragamuffin is not moderating is right.
sent1: that the concoction expires ragamuffin hold. sent2: if something does not collogue portable and does not expire ragamuffin then that it is moderating is true. sent3: if something that collogues portable expires ragamuffin then it does not moderate. sent4: if the ragamuffin is not a tribe and it is not an emphysema then it collogues portable. sent5: the ragamuffin is not a kind of a tribe and it is not an emphysema. sent6: there is something such that that it does not expire milkshake and it does not minstrel hack is not correct.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the ragamuffin does collogue portable.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the ragamuffin is not moderating if the ragamuffin does collogue portable and it expires ragamuffin is not false.;
the ragamuffin is moderating.
sent2 -> int3: if the ragamuffin does not collogue portable and it does not expire ragamuffin the fact that it is moderating is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ragamuffin is not moderating is right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the concoction expires ragamuffin hold. sent2: if something does not collogue portable and does not expire ragamuffin then that it is moderating is true. sent3: if something that collogues portable expires ragamuffin then it does not moderate. sent4: if the ragamuffin is not a tribe and it is not an emphysema then it collogues portable. sent5: the ragamuffin is not a kind of a tribe and it is not an emphysema. sent6: there is something such that that it does not expire milkshake and it does not minstrel hack is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the ragamuffin does collogue portable.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the ragamuffin is not moderating if the ragamuffin does collogue portable and it expires ragamuffin is not false.; __UNKNOWN__