the dentine studs Phalangiidae and it is a shotgun.
sent1: the dentine does not stud puerpera. sent2: the dentine does stud repatriation. sent3: the gilder is a carpetbag and it conglutinates. sent4: the infant's-breath is linguistic if the O is linguistic or not a carpetbag or both. sent5: the O splutters if there exists something such that the fact that it does stud repatriation and does stud puerpera does not hold. sent6: the fact that that the O is linguistic and studs puerpera does not hold is not false. sent7: the dentine is a Alonso if there is something such that that it does splutter and it does stud puerpera does not hold. sent8: the dentine nests concentration. sent9: that something is a kind of a carpetbag and does stud repatriation does not hold if it is not a kind of a Alonso. sent10: if the dentine does splutter it is linguistic. sent11: if there is something such that that it is carpetbag thing that studs repatriation does not hold the dentine does splutter. sent12: the dentine is a shotgun if either the infant's-breath is a kind of a shotgun or it is not an armor or both. sent13: the infant's-breath does not nest Malvaviscus if that it nest Malvaviscus and studs batiste is not correct. sent14: the infant's-breath is linguistic if the O is linguistic and/or it is not a kind of a shotgun. sent15: if the infant's-breath is a kind of an armor and/or it does not stud puerpera the O does armor. sent16: if something does not stud Phalangiidae that it does stud puerpera and it is a shotgun is incorrect. sent17: the academician is not helpful. sent18: the fact that the infant's-breath is an armor and it is a carpetbag is false. sent19: something is an absolutist if it is a Alonso. sent20: if the O is a Alonso that it is linguistic is right. sent21: if the fact that the O is linguistic thing that studs puerpera is not right it is not linguistic. sent22: the dentine studs Phalangiidae if it splutters. sent23: something does stud puerpera and it is a kind of an armor. sent24: the fact that the infant's-breath is a shotgun and/or not an armor is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the O is a Alonso.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the O is linguistic.; sent21 & sent6 -> int2: the O is not linguistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the O is not a Alonso.; sent9 -> int5: the fact that the O is a carpetbag and it studs repatriation is incorrect if it is not a Alonso.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the O is a kind of a carpetbag and it studs repatriation does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of carpetbag thing that studs repatriation is not correct.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that the dentine splutters is true.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the dentine does stud Phalangiidae.; sent12 & sent24 -> int10: the dentine is a shotgun.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
if the dentine is a Alonso it is an absolutist.
sent19 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the dentine studs Phalangiidae and it is a shotgun. ; $context$ = sent1: the dentine does not stud puerpera. sent2: the dentine does stud repatriation. sent3: the gilder is a carpetbag and it conglutinates. sent4: the infant's-breath is linguistic if the O is linguistic or not a carpetbag or both. sent5: the O splutters if there exists something such that the fact that it does stud repatriation and does stud puerpera does not hold. sent6: the fact that that the O is linguistic and studs puerpera does not hold is not false. sent7: the dentine is a Alonso if there is something such that that it does splutter and it does stud puerpera does not hold. sent8: the dentine nests concentration. sent9: that something is a kind of a carpetbag and does stud repatriation does not hold if it is not a kind of a Alonso. sent10: if the dentine does splutter it is linguistic. sent11: if there is something such that that it is carpetbag thing that studs repatriation does not hold the dentine does splutter. sent12: the dentine is a shotgun if either the infant's-breath is a kind of a shotgun or it is not an armor or both. sent13: the infant's-breath does not nest Malvaviscus if that it nest Malvaviscus and studs batiste is not correct. sent14: the infant's-breath is linguistic if the O is linguistic and/or it is not a kind of a shotgun. sent15: if the infant's-breath is a kind of an armor and/or it does not stud puerpera the O does armor. sent16: if something does not stud Phalangiidae that it does stud puerpera and it is a shotgun is incorrect. sent17: the academician is not helpful. sent18: the fact that the infant's-breath is an armor and it is a carpetbag is false. sent19: something is an absolutist if it is a Alonso. sent20: if the O is a Alonso that it is linguistic is right. sent21: if the fact that the O is linguistic thing that studs puerpera is not right it is not linguistic. sent22: the dentine studs Phalangiidae if it splutters. sent23: something does stud puerpera and it is a kind of an armor. sent24: the fact that the infant's-breath is a shotgun and/or not an armor is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the O is a Alonso.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the O is linguistic.; sent21 & sent6 -> int2: the O is not linguistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the O is not a Alonso.; sent9 -> int5: the fact that the O is a carpetbag and it studs repatriation is incorrect if it is not a Alonso.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the O is a kind of a carpetbag and it studs repatriation does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of carpetbag thing that studs repatriation is not correct.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that the dentine splutters is true.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the dentine does stud Phalangiidae.; sent12 & sent24 -> int10: the dentine is a shotgun.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__