if that the whelping pollster occurs is not wrong then that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the stating does not occur if the victualling occurs and the whelping click does not occur. sent2: that the whelping pollster does not occur is triggered by that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur. sent3: that the individuating sorrow occurs but the jostling demurrage does not occur does not hold if the whelping pollster occurs. sent4: the whelping pollster occurs if that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur is not false. sent5: if not the individuating sorrow but the jostling demurrage happens then the whelping pollster does not occur. sent6: the whelping patterned does not occur and the kittee does not occur if the impulse does not occur. sent7: the fact that the affliction does not occur but the detribalization occurs is not true. sent8: that the stating does not occur results in that the whelping pollster does not occur and the impulse does not occur. sent9: that the kidnapping hardbake but not the Panhellenicness happens prevents that the fare-stage occurs. sent10: that not the insentientness but the kidnapping Sturnidae occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the whelping pollster does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the whelping pollster happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur does not hold.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the whelping patterned does not occur and the kittee does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if that the whelping pollster occurs is not wrong then that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the stating does not occur if the victualling occurs and the whelping click does not occur. sent2: that the whelping pollster does not occur is triggered by that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur. sent3: that the individuating sorrow occurs but the jostling demurrage does not occur does not hold if the whelping pollster occurs. sent4: the whelping pollster occurs if that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur is not false. sent5: if not the individuating sorrow but the jostling demurrage happens then the whelping pollster does not occur. sent6: the whelping patterned does not occur and the kittee does not occur if the impulse does not occur. sent7: the fact that the affliction does not occur but the detribalization occurs is not true. sent8: that the stating does not occur results in that the whelping pollster does not occur and the impulse does not occur. sent9: that the kidnapping hardbake but not the Panhellenicness happens prevents that the fare-stage occurs. sent10: that not the insentientness but the kidnapping Sturnidae occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the whelping pollster does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the whelping pollster happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the individuating sorrow does not occur and the jostling demurrage does not occur does not hold.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__