the fact that if the cyma does not deviate that the fact that the soffit does slight ramble and/or is not unpaintable is not true is not false is incorrect.
sent1: something is not desirable and does not acquaint Cercidiphyllum. sent2: something does chance if it does patrol crunch. sent3: the fact that the soffit does not patrol crunch is not incorrect if it does not acquaint Bernard. sent4: the cyma patrols crunch if something that is not desirable does not acquaint Cercidiphyllum. sent5: the soffit is not nonconductive if the cyma is a chance and does not deviate. sent6: the fact that that either the cyma is a basalt or it revises resentment or both is not correct is true. sent7: if something that does not patrol crunch is not nonconductive the cyma does slight ramble. sent8: the fact that something does slight ramble and/or is not unpaintable is false if it is not nonconductive. sent9: if there exists something such that it does not deviate and is unpaintable the soffit does slight ramble. sent10: if something does deviate it does chance. sent11: the cyma does chance if the fact that it slights ramble is not wrong. sent12: if something that does not deviate is not unpaintable the soffit chances. sent13: if something is not cataphatic then the fact that it is not a heartland is right. sent14: something is desirable but it does not acquaint Cercidiphyllum.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the cyma patrols crunch.; sent2 -> int2: if the cyma does patrol crunch it is a chance.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cyma is a kind of a chance.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cyma does not deviate.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the cyma does chance but it does not deviate.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the soffit is not nonconductive.; sent8 -> int6: the fact that the soffit either does slight ramble or is not unpaintable or both is not true if it is not nonconductive.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the soffit does slight ramble and/or it is not unpaintable is false.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the cyma does not deviate that the fact that the soffit does slight ramble and/or is not unpaintable is not true is not false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not desirable and does not acquaint Cercidiphyllum. sent2: something does chance if it does patrol crunch. sent3: the fact that the soffit does not patrol crunch is not incorrect if it does not acquaint Bernard. sent4: the cyma patrols crunch if something that is not desirable does not acquaint Cercidiphyllum. sent5: the soffit is not nonconductive if the cyma is a chance and does not deviate. sent6: the fact that that either the cyma is a basalt or it revises resentment or both is not correct is true. sent7: if something that does not patrol crunch is not nonconductive the cyma does slight ramble. sent8: the fact that something does slight ramble and/or is not unpaintable is false if it is not nonconductive. sent9: if there exists something such that it does not deviate and is unpaintable the soffit does slight ramble. sent10: if something does deviate it does chance. sent11: the cyma does chance if the fact that it slights ramble is not wrong. sent12: if something that does not deviate is not unpaintable the soffit chances. sent13: if something is not cataphatic then the fact that it is not a heartland is right. sent14: something is desirable but it does not acquaint Cercidiphyllum. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the cyma patrols crunch.; sent2 -> int2: if the cyma does patrol crunch it is a chance.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cyma is a kind of a chance.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cyma does not deviate.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the cyma does chance but it does not deviate.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the soffit is not nonconductive.; sent8 -> int6: the fact that the soffit either does slight ramble or is not unpaintable or both is not true if it is not nonconductive.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the soffit does slight ramble and/or it is not unpaintable is false.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__