the fact that the persuader confederates cowpox but it is not an equatorial is not incorrect.
sent1: that the corner is not a poisonberry but it is a Homogyne is false if the fact that the madnep does confederate cowpox is correct. sent2: the madnep is a universal and it is a kind of a poisonberry. sent3: the persuader is not an equatorial if that the scrambler is a kind of an equatorial and it hashes didacticism is wrong. sent4: the scrambler is not a kind of a psylla. sent5: if something is not a psylla then the fact that it is an equatorial and does hash didacticism does not hold. sent6: the sprigtail is a kind of a Homogyne if the fact that it does drum and it is not a kind of a Homogyne is false. sent7: the madnep does chasten if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-meteoric thing that is Hellenic is not correct. sent8: something is a mordant but it does not pink if it does not chasten. sent9: there exists something such that that it is non-meteoric thing that is Hellenic is not true. sent10: the fact that the persuader is a kind of a Homogyne and confederates cowpox is not true. sent11: the persuader does confederate cowpox if that the madnep is both a poisonberry and not a mordant is correct. sent12: the fact that the sprigtail is both a drum and not a Homogyne is wrong. sent13: the sprigtail is not a Homogyne if the madnep does chasten and is a mordant.
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the madnep does chasten.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the madnep is a mordant.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the madnep chastens and it is a mordant.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the sprigtail is not a Homogyne.; sent6 & sent12 -> int4: the sprigtail is a Homogyne.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the madnep is not a mordant.; sent2 -> int7: the madnep is a kind of a poisonberry.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the madnep is a kind of a poisonberry and is not a mordant.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the persuader does confederate cowpox.; sent5 -> int10: if the scrambler is not a psylla then that it is an equatorial and does hash didacticism is wrong.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the fact that the scrambler is a kind of equatorial thing that does hash didacticism is false.; sent3 & int11 -> int12: the persuader is not an equatorial.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the corner is a kind of a mordant and does not pink.
sent8 -> int13: the corner is a mordant and is not a pink if the fact that it does not chasten is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the persuader confederates cowpox but it is not an equatorial is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the corner is not a poisonberry but it is a Homogyne is false if the fact that the madnep does confederate cowpox is correct. sent2: the madnep is a universal and it is a kind of a poisonberry. sent3: the persuader is not an equatorial if that the scrambler is a kind of an equatorial and it hashes didacticism is wrong. sent4: the scrambler is not a kind of a psylla. sent5: if something is not a psylla then the fact that it is an equatorial and does hash didacticism does not hold. sent6: the sprigtail is a kind of a Homogyne if the fact that it does drum and it is not a kind of a Homogyne is false. sent7: the madnep does chasten if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-meteoric thing that is Hellenic is not correct. sent8: something is a mordant but it does not pink if it does not chasten. sent9: there exists something such that that it is non-meteoric thing that is Hellenic is not true. sent10: the fact that the persuader is a kind of a Homogyne and confederates cowpox is not true. sent11: the persuader does confederate cowpox if that the madnep is both a poisonberry and not a mordant is correct. sent12: the fact that the sprigtail is both a drum and not a Homogyne is wrong. sent13: the sprigtail is not a Homogyne if the madnep does chasten and is a mordant. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent7 -> int1: the madnep does chasten.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the madnep is a mordant.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the madnep chastens and it is a mordant.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the sprigtail is not a Homogyne.; sent6 & sent12 -> int4: the sprigtail is a Homogyne.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the madnep is not a mordant.; sent2 -> int7: the madnep is a kind of a poisonberry.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the madnep is a kind of a poisonberry and is not a mordant.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the persuader does confederate cowpox.; sent5 -> int10: if the scrambler is not a psylla then that it is an equatorial and does hash didacticism is wrong.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the fact that the scrambler is a kind of equatorial thing that does hash didacticism is false.; sent3 & int11 -> int12: the persuader is not an equatorial.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__