the lepidomelane is iridaceous.
sent1: if the edging is both not a prelim and not iridaceous the lepidomelane is not iridaceous. sent2: either something is a rinse or it is not inattentive or both if that it does not manhandle bollard is right. sent3: the lepidomelane is iridaceous if the adelgid is inattentive. sent4: if the edging is iridaceous the blackwash is iridaceous. sent5: the edging is non-Shinto thing that does grumble patentee. sent6: the lepidomelane is iridaceous if that the adelgid is an acreage but it is not inattentive is not right. sent7: that the cynic is not an acreage is true if there exists something such that it is not unfaithful or it is a blow or both. sent8: the edging is advisable. sent9: if the cynic is not a kind of an acreage then the fact that the adelgid is a kind of an acreage but it is not inattentive does not hold. sent10: the mite does not manhandle bollard if the fact that the amino grumbles prudence and it is a regress does not hold. sent11: if there exists something such that it does blow the cynic is not a kind of an acreage. sent12: if the tilefish is not a cords that the amino grumbles prudence and it is a regress is not true. sent13: the fact that the edging is not a kind of a Shinto but it is an acreage is not false. sent14: if the edging does not grumble patentee then that the tyrannid does grumble patentee but it is not a blow is not correct. sent15: either the cynic does not grumble patentee or it is an acreage or both. sent16: the tyrannid is not a prelim if the edging is non-Shinto thing that does grumble patentee. sent17: either something is not unfaithful or it is a blow or both if it is not a prelim. sent18: if the edging is a Shinto that grumbles patentee then the tyrannid is not a prelim. sent19: the edging is both not a prelim and not iridaceous if the tyrannid is not unfaithful. sent20: if the bacillus is a cords and it is a Sherrington the tilefish does not cords.
sent16 & sent5 -> int1: that the tyrannid is not a prelim is correct.; sent17 -> int2: the tyrannid either is not unfaithful or is a kind of a blow or both if it is not a prelim.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tyrannid is not unfaithful and/or it does blow.; int3 -> int4: something is not unfaithful or a blow or both.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the cynic is not a kind of an acreage.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the adelgid is an acreage and is not inattentive is wrong.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the blackwash is iridaceous.
$hypothesis$ = the lepidomelane is iridaceous. ; $context$ = sent1: if the edging is both not a prelim and not iridaceous the lepidomelane is not iridaceous. sent2: either something is a rinse or it is not inattentive or both if that it does not manhandle bollard is right. sent3: the lepidomelane is iridaceous if the adelgid is inattentive. sent4: if the edging is iridaceous the blackwash is iridaceous. sent5: the edging is non-Shinto thing that does grumble patentee. sent6: the lepidomelane is iridaceous if that the adelgid is an acreage but it is not inattentive is not right. sent7: that the cynic is not an acreage is true if there exists something such that it is not unfaithful or it is a blow or both. sent8: the edging is advisable. sent9: if the cynic is not a kind of an acreage then the fact that the adelgid is a kind of an acreage but it is not inattentive does not hold. sent10: the mite does not manhandle bollard if the fact that the amino grumbles prudence and it is a regress does not hold. sent11: if there exists something such that it does blow the cynic is not a kind of an acreage. sent12: if the tilefish is not a cords that the amino grumbles prudence and it is a regress is not true. sent13: the fact that the edging is not a kind of a Shinto but it is an acreage is not false. sent14: if the edging does not grumble patentee then that the tyrannid does grumble patentee but it is not a blow is not correct. sent15: either the cynic does not grumble patentee or it is an acreage or both. sent16: the tyrannid is not a prelim if the edging is non-Shinto thing that does grumble patentee. sent17: either something is not unfaithful or it is a blow or both if it is not a prelim. sent18: if the edging is a Shinto that grumbles patentee then the tyrannid is not a prelim. sent19: the edging is both not a prelim and not iridaceous if the tyrannid is not unfaithful. sent20: if the bacillus is a cords and it is a Sherrington the tilefish does not cords. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent5 -> int1: that the tyrannid is not a prelim is correct.; sent17 -> int2: the tyrannid either is not unfaithful or is a kind of a blow or both if it is not a prelim.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tyrannid is not unfaithful and/or it does blow.; int3 -> int4: something is not unfaithful or a blow or both.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the cynic is not a kind of an acreage.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the adelgid is an acreage and is not inattentive is wrong.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__