the fact that the areola is not a Kent and it does not overturn inefficacy does not hold.
sent1: that the salwar is septal and is not solid is not correct if the ketorolac does not overturn instep. sent2: the paperhanger is not a kapok and it is not a mnemonics. sent3: the areola does group protoctist and it is a spectrum. sent4: if something does impend and is not on-line it does not overturn instep. sent5: if that the areola does not group protoctist and is septal is false it does not overturn instep. sent6: the watermeal is not a kind of a spectrum if there exists something such that the fact that it overturns instep and/or it is not septal is incorrect. sent7: if the mealworm is septal the salwar impends and is not on-line. sent8: the mealworm is septal. sent9: if the fact that the salwar is septal but it is not a kind of a solid is wrong then the fact that the mealworm is not septal hold. sent10: if something pours areola and it groups protoctist it does not overturn inefficacy. sent11: if the salwar does not overturn instep that that the areola does not overturn instep and is a solid does not hold is not false. sent12: the mealworm is not a kind of a Kent. sent13: the protoctist is on-line. sent14: the areola does pour areola. sent15: the salwar impends. sent16: if the fact that the rear does overturn instep and it does group protoctist does not hold then the ketorolac does not overturn instep. sent17: The areola does pour areola. sent18: if the salwar does overturn filter the fact that it does not impend hold. sent19: the hydra does not impend. sent20: the areola is a surprise. sent21: the areola is not a Kent if that it does not overturn instep and it is a solid is not right. sent22: that the nincompoop does not overturn instep is not incorrect.
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the salwar impends but it is not on-line.; sent4 -> int2: the salwar does not overturn instep if it does impend and is not on-line.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the salwar does not overturn instep.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the areola does not overturn instep but it is a solid does not hold.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the areola is not a Kent.; sent10 -> int6: the areola does not overturn inefficacy if it pours areola and it does group protoctist.; sent3 -> int7: the areola does group protoctist.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the areola does pour areola and does group protoctist.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the areola does not overturn inefficacy.; int5 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the watermeal is not a spectrum.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the areola is not a Kent and it does not overturn inefficacy does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the salwar is septal and is not solid is not correct if the ketorolac does not overturn instep. sent2: the paperhanger is not a kapok and it is not a mnemonics. sent3: the areola does group protoctist and it is a spectrum. sent4: if something does impend and is not on-line it does not overturn instep. sent5: if that the areola does not group protoctist and is septal is false it does not overturn instep. sent6: the watermeal is not a kind of a spectrum if there exists something such that the fact that it overturns instep and/or it is not septal is incorrect. sent7: if the mealworm is septal the salwar impends and is not on-line. sent8: the mealworm is septal. sent9: if the fact that the salwar is septal but it is not a kind of a solid is wrong then the fact that the mealworm is not septal hold. sent10: if something pours areola and it groups protoctist it does not overturn inefficacy. sent11: if the salwar does not overturn instep that that the areola does not overturn instep and is a solid does not hold is not false. sent12: the mealworm is not a kind of a Kent. sent13: the protoctist is on-line. sent14: the areola does pour areola. sent15: the salwar impends. sent16: if the fact that the rear does overturn instep and it does group protoctist does not hold then the ketorolac does not overturn instep. sent17: The areola does pour areola. sent18: if the salwar does overturn filter the fact that it does not impend hold. sent19: the hydra does not impend. sent20: the areola is a surprise. sent21: the areola is not a Kent if that it does not overturn instep and it is a solid is not right. sent22: that the nincompoop does not overturn instep is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the salwar impends but it is not on-line.; sent4 -> int2: the salwar does not overturn instep if it does impend and is not on-line.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the salwar does not overturn instep.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the areola does not overturn instep but it is a solid does not hold.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the areola is not a Kent.; sent10 -> int6: the areola does not overturn inefficacy if it pours areola and it does group protoctist.; sent3 -> int7: the areola does group protoctist.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the areola does pour areola and does group protoctist.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the areola does not overturn inefficacy.; int5 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__