the fact that there exists something such that if it is not unwieldy that either it is a kind of a cabana or it is not quadrangular or both does not hold is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not unwieldy then it is not a cabana. sent2: either the Swede does negotiate Alexander or it is not patriarchal or both if it does not trisect auditorium. sent3: if the Swede is not unwieldy that it is a cabana and/or is not quadrangular is not right. sent4: the Swede is not metamorphic if it does not trisect chandelle. sent5: there is something such that if it is non-osmotic the fact that it is centrifugal and/or is not Yeatsian does not hold. sent6: the fact that the Swede is Coleridgian or it is not sidereal or both is not true if it does not shoot. sent7: there is something such that if it does trisect Nestor then the fact that it does bum and/or is not residential does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not unwieldy is right then that it is a kind of a cabana or is quadrangular or both is not correct. sent9: if the Alexander is not molecular the fact that it is a cabana and/or is not tympanic is not true. sent10: if the Swede is ungulate then the fact that it is not non-quadrangular and/or it is not a kind of an intangible is not correct. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a Wykeham then it is legislative and/or it is not a Sarawakian. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a antipsychotic then it is material or it is not a Higginson or both. sent13: if the Swede insulates then the fact that it either aggrieves or is not unwieldy or both does not hold. sent14: if the Swede is not unwieldy then that it is not a cabana is not false.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not unwieldy that either it is a kind of a cabana or it is not quadrangular or both does not hold is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not unwieldy then it is not a cabana. sent2: either the Swede does negotiate Alexander or it is not patriarchal or both if it does not trisect auditorium. sent3: if the Swede is not unwieldy that it is a cabana and/or is not quadrangular is not right. sent4: the Swede is not metamorphic if it does not trisect chandelle. sent5: there is something such that if it is non-osmotic the fact that it is centrifugal and/or is not Yeatsian does not hold. sent6: the fact that the Swede is Coleridgian or it is not sidereal or both is not true if it does not shoot. sent7: there is something such that if it does trisect Nestor then the fact that it does bum and/or is not residential does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not unwieldy is right then that it is a kind of a cabana or is quadrangular or both is not correct. sent9: if the Alexander is not molecular the fact that it is a cabana and/or is not tympanic is not true. sent10: if the Swede is ungulate then the fact that it is not non-quadrangular and/or it is not a kind of an intangible is not correct. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a Wykeham then it is legislative and/or it is not a Sarawakian. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a antipsychotic then it is material or it is not a Higginson or both. sent13: if the Swede insulates then the fact that it either aggrieves or is not unwieldy or both does not hold. sent14: if the Swede is not unwieldy then that it is not a cabana is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__