that the mouthbreeder is a deprecation if the thenar is not nonfictional is not right.
sent1: the mouthbreeder is nonfictional if the thenar is not a kind of a modillion. sent2: if a arbitrable thing does not carjack Parji then it is not phrenic. sent3: if the thenar is fictional then the fact that it is auscultatory and it is not a modillion is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that that it is auscultatory and it is a kind of a modillion is incorrect. sent5: the thenar flocks speculativeness and is a deprecation if the mouthbreeder is not phrenic. sent6: if the mouthbreeder is a kind of a deprecation the fact that it is auscultatory and it is not a modillion is not correct. sent7: the mouthbreeder is a deprecation if there exists something such that the fact that it is auscultatory and is not a modillion is incorrect. sent8: there is something such that that it is nonfictional and it is not auscultatory is not correct. sent9: the fact that that something is a Demeter that is not myelinic is not false is not right if it is nonfictional. sent10: if there is something such that it is not auscultatory the mouthbreeder is a deprecation. sent11: a deprecation is nonfictional.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thenar is not nonfictional.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the thenar is auscultatory but it is not a kind of a modillion is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is auscultatory and it is not a modillion is not wrong is incorrect.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the mouthbreeder is a kind of a deprecation.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that that it is a Demeter and it is not myelinic is false.
sent9 -> int4: that that the thenar is both a Demeter and not myelinic is not right is correct if it is nonfictional.; sent11 -> int5: if the thenar is a deprecation then it is nonfictional.; sent2 -> int6: if the mouthbreeder is not nonarbitrable and it does not carjack Parji then it is not phrenic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the mouthbreeder is a deprecation if the thenar is not nonfictional is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the mouthbreeder is nonfictional if the thenar is not a kind of a modillion. sent2: if a arbitrable thing does not carjack Parji then it is not phrenic. sent3: if the thenar is fictional then the fact that it is auscultatory and it is not a modillion is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that that it is auscultatory and it is a kind of a modillion is incorrect. sent5: the thenar flocks speculativeness and is a deprecation if the mouthbreeder is not phrenic. sent6: if the mouthbreeder is a kind of a deprecation the fact that it is auscultatory and it is not a modillion is not correct. sent7: the mouthbreeder is a deprecation if there exists something such that the fact that it is auscultatory and is not a modillion is incorrect. sent8: there is something such that that it is nonfictional and it is not auscultatory is not correct. sent9: the fact that that something is a Demeter that is not myelinic is not false is not right if it is nonfictional. sent10: if there is something such that it is not auscultatory the mouthbreeder is a deprecation. sent11: a deprecation is nonfictional. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thenar is not nonfictional.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the thenar is auscultatory but it is not a kind of a modillion is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is auscultatory and it is not a modillion is not wrong is incorrect.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the mouthbreeder is a kind of a deprecation.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__