the vase is a kind of a lanthanum.
sent1: something is meretricious. sent2: the blowtorch is repetitive and is a limber. sent3: a confederate is a Bergman. sent4: The Psidium does deposit rock. sent5: the rock is meretricious if the dime deposits Psidium. sent6: the rock does deposit Psidium. sent7: something is meretricious thing that is not nonrepetitive if it does not limber. sent8: the catalyst confederates. sent9: the saddlebag is a kind of a limber that is destructive. sent10: the telomere does measure psilocybin if the blowtorch is repetitive. sent11: if there exists something such that it deposits Psidium the saddlebag is a kind of a Bergman that is destructive. sent12: the dime is not a Bahai. sent13: the vase is a Bergman. sent14: if something is nonrepetitive then that it is not a limber but a lanthanum is incorrect. sent15: that something does not measure psilocybin and is repetitive does not hold if it is not unilateral. sent16: something deposits Psidium or it is destructive or both if it is not a Bahai. sent17: the fact that the saddlebag is destructive hold. sent18: something is meretricious if it is unilateral. sent19: if the saddlebag is not unilateral the telomere is not unilateral. sent20: the saddlebag is unilateral if the telomere does measure psilocybin. sent21: if that the saddlebag measures psilocybin is not incorrect then the telomere is unilateral. sent22: there exists something such that it is repetitive a Bergman. sent23: if the rock is unilateral and is meretricious then the saddlebag is not unilateral. sent24: the rock is a kind of a Bergman if the catalyst is a kind of a Bergman. sent25: the saddlebag is destructive if there is something such that it deposits Psidium. sent26: the vase is a kind of a lanthanum if something that is meretricious is a Bergman.
sent2 -> int1: the blowtorch is repetitive.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the telomere measures psilocybin.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the saddlebag is unilateral.; sent18 -> int4: if the saddlebag is unilateral then it is meretricious.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the saddlebag is meretricious.; sent6 -> int6: something does deposit Psidium.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the fact that the saddlebag is a kind of a Bergman and it is destructive is correct.; int7 -> int8: the saddlebag is a Bergman.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the saddlebag is meretricious and is a kind of a Bergman.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is meretricious and it is a kind of a Bergman.; int10 & sent26 -> hypothesis;
the vase is not a lanthanum.
sent14 -> int11: the fact that the blowtorch is not a kind of a limber and is a lanthanum does not hold if it is not repetitive.; sent15 -> int12: if the telomere is not unilateral the fact that it does not measure psilocybin and it is repetitive is not correct.; sent3 -> int13: the catalyst is a Bergman if it confederates.; int13 & sent8 -> int14: the catalyst is a Bergman.; sent24 & int14 -> int15: the rock is a kind of a Bergman.; sent16 -> int16: the dime does deposit Psidium and/or it is destructive if it is not a kind of a Bahai.; int16 & sent12 -> int17: either the dime does deposit Psidium or it is destructive or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the vase is a kind of a lanthanum. ; $context$ = sent1: something is meretricious. sent2: the blowtorch is repetitive and is a limber. sent3: a confederate is a Bergman. sent4: The Psidium does deposit rock. sent5: the rock is meretricious if the dime deposits Psidium. sent6: the rock does deposit Psidium. sent7: something is meretricious thing that is not nonrepetitive if it does not limber. sent8: the catalyst confederates. sent9: the saddlebag is a kind of a limber that is destructive. sent10: the telomere does measure psilocybin if the blowtorch is repetitive. sent11: if there exists something such that it deposits Psidium the saddlebag is a kind of a Bergman that is destructive. sent12: the dime is not a Bahai. sent13: the vase is a Bergman. sent14: if something is nonrepetitive then that it is not a limber but a lanthanum is incorrect. sent15: that something does not measure psilocybin and is repetitive does not hold if it is not unilateral. sent16: something deposits Psidium or it is destructive or both if it is not a Bahai. sent17: the fact that the saddlebag is destructive hold. sent18: something is meretricious if it is unilateral. sent19: if the saddlebag is not unilateral the telomere is not unilateral. sent20: the saddlebag is unilateral if the telomere does measure psilocybin. sent21: if that the saddlebag measures psilocybin is not incorrect then the telomere is unilateral. sent22: there exists something such that it is repetitive a Bergman. sent23: if the rock is unilateral and is meretricious then the saddlebag is not unilateral. sent24: the rock is a kind of a Bergman if the catalyst is a kind of a Bergman. sent25: the saddlebag is destructive if there is something such that it deposits Psidium. sent26: the vase is a kind of a lanthanum if something that is meretricious is a Bergman. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the blowtorch is repetitive.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the telomere measures psilocybin.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the saddlebag is unilateral.; sent18 -> int4: if the saddlebag is unilateral then it is meretricious.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the saddlebag is meretricious.; sent6 -> int6: something does deposit Psidium.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the fact that the saddlebag is a kind of a Bergman and it is destructive is correct.; int7 -> int8: the saddlebag is a Bergman.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the saddlebag is meretricious and is a kind of a Bergman.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is meretricious and it is a kind of a Bergman.; int10 & sent26 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__