the fact that the snorer is monochromatic thing that is mecopterous is false.
sent1: that the snorer is not non-monochromatic and not non-mecopterous if the shallot is not non-monochromatic hold. sent2: that the snorer is a kind of a saddle hold. sent3: if the fact that the shallot does circularize eluate is correct it is phonetics. sent4: the fact that the shallot does refrain sawm is not wrong if something does not circularize tact and/or it does not photostat grandparent. sent5: that the monkshood refrains Nelumbo but it is not phonetics does not hold. sent6: the shallot is phonetics. sent7: if something circularizes eluate it does not circularize tact or it does not photostat grandparent or both. sent8: the fact that the snorer is both not non-monochromatic and mecopterous is not true if that the infant's-breath does not circularize eluate is right. sent9: the shallot is an immolation if it refrains sawm. sent10: the shallot is not monochromatic if it is an immolation and is phonetics. sent11: that the shallot is not forceful and photostats grandparent is not right if the swab does circularize tact. sent12: the shallot does circularize tact and it is phonetics if the infant's-breath does not circularize tact. sent13: the infant's-breath circularizes eluate and it is forceful. sent14: the swab is not an immolation if there exists something such that that it does refrain Nelumbo and it is not phonetics is not right.
sent13 -> int1: the infant's-breath circularizes eluate.; sent7 -> int2: the infant's-breath does not circularize tact and/or it does not photostat grandparent if that it circularizes eluate is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: either the infant's-breath does not circularize tact or it does not photostat grandparent or both.; int3 -> int4: something does not circularize tact and/or it does not photostat grandparent.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: that the shallot refrains sawm hold.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the shallot is an immolation.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the shallot is a kind of an immolation that is phonetics is not wrong.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the shallot is not monochromatic hold.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the snorer is both monochromatic and mecopterous is not correct.
sent5 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does refrain Nelumbo and is non-phonetics is not correct.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: the swab is not an immolation.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the snorer is monochromatic thing that is mecopterous is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the snorer is not non-monochromatic and not non-mecopterous if the shallot is not non-monochromatic hold. sent2: that the snorer is a kind of a saddle hold. sent3: if the fact that the shallot does circularize eluate is correct it is phonetics. sent4: the fact that the shallot does refrain sawm is not wrong if something does not circularize tact and/or it does not photostat grandparent. sent5: that the monkshood refrains Nelumbo but it is not phonetics does not hold. sent6: the shallot is phonetics. sent7: if something circularizes eluate it does not circularize tact or it does not photostat grandparent or both. sent8: the fact that the snorer is both not non-monochromatic and mecopterous is not true if that the infant's-breath does not circularize eluate is right. sent9: the shallot is an immolation if it refrains sawm. sent10: the shallot is not monochromatic if it is an immolation and is phonetics. sent11: that the shallot is not forceful and photostats grandparent is not right if the swab does circularize tact. sent12: the shallot does circularize tact and it is phonetics if the infant's-breath does not circularize tact. sent13: the infant's-breath circularizes eluate and it is forceful. sent14: the swab is not an immolation if there exists something such that that it does refrain Nelumbo and it is not phonetics is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the infant's-breath circularizes eluate.; sent7 -> int2: the infant's-breath does not circularize tact and/or it does not photostat grandparent if that it circularizes eluate is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: either the infant's-breath does not circularize tact or it does not photostat grandparent or both.; int3 -> int4: something does not circularize tact and/or it does not photostat grandparent.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: that the shallot refrains sawm hold.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the shallot is an immolation.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the shallot is a kind of an immolation that is phonetics is not wrong.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the shallot is not monochromatic hold.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__