the grassiness or the apparition or both occurs.
sent1: the gesticulating Jude does not occur. sent2: if the fact that not the gesticulating Xavier but the caper happens is false then the caper does not occur. sent3: that either the grassiness or the apparition or both happens is not correct if the aneroidness does not occur. sent4: that the pitching does not occur but the grassiness occurs is triggered by that the nonevent does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the gesticulating mohawk does not occur but the cross-linguisticness occurs is not correct then that the cross-linguisticness does not occur hold. sent6: if the caper does not occur the blockage happens and the gesticulating amalgamation does not occur. sent7: that not the gesticulating Xavier but the capering happens is not right. sent8: if both the aneroidness and the nonevent happens the blockage does not occur. sent9: the aneroidness happens and the neuroticness occurs. sent10: that the aneroid does not occur is triggered by that the neuroticness does not occur. sent11: that the beckoning ileus and the aneroid happens is triggered by that the neuroticness does not occur. sent12: the parabolicness happens. sent13: if that not the pitching but the apparition happens is not right the grassiness does not occur. sent14: the denying comer does not occur. sent15: both the denying quintal and the homicide happens.
sent9 -> int1: that the aneroidness occurs hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonevent happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the aneroidness and the nonevent occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the blockage does not occur.; sent2 & sent7 -> int4: the capering does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the blockage occurs and the gesticulating amalgamation does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the blockage happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the nonevent does not occur.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: not the pitching but the grassiness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the fact that the grassiness happens is true.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the grassiness and/or the apparition occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = the grassiness or the apparition or both occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the gesticulating Jude does not occur. sent2: if the fact that not the gesticulating Xavier but the caper happens is false then the caper does not occur. sent3: that either the grassiness or the apparition or both happens is not correct if the aneroidness does not occur. sent4: that the pitching does not occur but the grassiness occurs is triggered by that the nonevent does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the gesticulating mohawk does not occur but the cross-linguisticness occurs is not correct then that the cross-linguisticness does not occur hold. sent6: if the caper does not occur the blockage happens and the gesticulating amalgamation does not occur. sent7: that not the gesticulating Xavier but the capering happens is not right. sent8: if both the aneroidness and the nonevent happens the blockage does not occur. sent9: the aneroidness happens and the neuroticness occurs. sent10: that the aneroid does not occur is triggered by that the neuroticness does not occur. sent11: that the beckoning ileus and the aneroid happens is triggered by that the neuroticness does not occur. sent12: the parabolicness happens. sent13: if that not the pitching but the apparition happens is not right the grassiness does not occur. sent14: the denying comer does not occur. sent15: both the denying quintal and the homicide happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the aneroidness occurs hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonevent happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the aneroidness and the nonevent occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the blockage does not occur.; sent2 & sent7 -> int4: the capering does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the blockage occurs and the gesticulating amalgamation does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the blockage happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the nonevent does not occur.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: not the pitching but the grassiness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the fact that the grassiness happens is true.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__