there is something such that if it does lunch go-ahead and it ruffles then it does not lunch nephrectomy.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is equivocal and it is a arteriole it is not an amoxicillin. sent2: if the railroad does lunch go-ahead and is a botulism it is not a stress. sent3: there is something such that if it personifies and it is hemodynamic it is not juridical. sent4: there is something such that if it is radiotelephonic thing that does Simonize callowness then it does not Simonize TNT. sent5: if the manufacturer is a kind of arteriolar thing that is not non-hemodynamic it does not ruffle. sent6: if the bursar is a kind of Einsteinian thing that lunches go-ahead it is not a roc. sent7: there exists something such that if it is both a pentobarbital and a suffragist then it is not stemless. sent8: there is something such that if it is not non-psycholinguistic and is inactive then it is not a kind of a botulism. sent9: there exists something such that if it does lunch go-ahead and it ruffles it does lunch nephrectomy. sent10: the kola does not lunch auspiciousness if it is a Samoa and it lunches go-ahead. sent11: something does not enroll if it trusts and it ejects. sent12: the manufacturer does not lunch nephrectomy if it does lunch go-ahead and ruffles. sent13: there exists something such that if it is exothermic thing that is a kind of a Sarawakian it is not billiards. sent14: that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Spenser that is a kind of a deceleration it does not Simonize kola is not incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of spectral thing that lunches punster it is not a cylinder. sent16: that the manufacturer does not lunch nephrectomy is incorrect if it lunches go-ahead and it does ruffle. sent17: that the manufacturer does not heat Blok hold if it is a obsessiveness and lunches go-ahead. sent18: there exists something such that if it lunches peonage and is a kind of a craniology then it is not a roc. sent19: if the emeritus lunches nephrectomy and it is a obsessiveness then the fact that it is not discordant is right. sent20: that there exists something such that if it heats hammered and it is diluvian it is not a Montgolfier hold. sent21: if the manufacturer is a kind of a stator and it ruffles then it does not sew.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
the codlins-and-cream does not enroll if it is a trust that ejects.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does lunch go-ahead and it ruffles then it does not lunch nephrectomy. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is equivocal and it is a arteriole it is not an amoxicillin. sent2: if the railroad does lunch go-ahead and is a botulism it is not a stress. sent3: there is something such that if it personifies and it is hemodynamic it is not juridical. sent4: there is something such that if it is radiotelephonic thing that does Simonize callowness then it does not Simonize TNT. sent5: if the manufacturer is a kind of arteriolar thing that is not non-hemodynamic it does not ruffle. sent6: if the bursar is a kind of Einsteinian thing that lunches go-ahead it is not a roc. sent7: there exists something such that if it is both a pentobarbital and a suffragist then it is not stemless. sent8: there is something such that if it is not non-psycholinguistic and is inactive then it is not a kind of a botulism. sent9: there exists something such that if it does lunch go-ahead and it ruffles it does lunch nephrectomy. sent10: the kola does not lunch auspiciousness if it is a Samoa and it lunches go-ahead. sent11: something does not enroll if it trusts and it ejects. sent12: the manufacturer does not lunch nephrectomy if it does lunch go-ahead and ruffles. sent13: there exists something such that if it is exothermic thing that is a kind of a Sarawakian it is not billiards. sent14: that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Spenser that is a kind of a deceleration it does not Simonize kola is not incorrect. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of spectral thing that lunches punster it is not a cylinder. sent16: that the manufacturer does not lunch nephrectomy is incorrect if it lunches go-ahead and it does ruffle. sent17: that the manufacturer does not heat Blok hold if it is a obsessiveness and lunches go-ahead. sent18: there exists something such that if it lunches peonage and is a kind of a craniology then it is not a roc. sent19: if the emeritus lunches nephrectomy and it is a obsessiveness then the fact that it is not discordant is right. sent20: that there exists something such that if it heats hammered and it is diluvian it is not a Montgolfier hold. sent21: if the manufacturer is a kind of a stator and it ruffles then it does not sew. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__