the bethinking occurs.
sent1: if the fact that both the dumpiness and the surficialness happens is false then the surficialness does not occur. sent2: that the dumpiness and the surficialness happens is false if the gating monoculture does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the surficialness does not occur hold the fact that the achromatizing washroom happens and the bethinking occurs is false. sent4: the gating cocobolo occurs if that the cellulosidness but not the entertainment occurs is not correct. sent5: if the priming pleomorphism occurs and the postmeridianness occurs then the bethinking does not occur. sent6: if that the demarche does not occur is not false the speech happens and the conviction occurs. sent7: that the gating cocobolo does not occur is true. sent8: that the achromatizing mayhaw does not occur causes that the waning does not occur and the gating monoculture does not occur. sent9: both the vestalness and the non-azoticness happens. sent10: if the postmeridianness does not occur the gating cocobolo occurs and/or the priming pleomorphism happens. sent11: the postmeridianness occurs. sent12: that the waning does not occur is triggered by that the speech does not occur and the achromatizing mayhaw does not occur. sent13: that the postmeridianness does not occur and the achromatizing washroom does not occur is triggered by that the surficialness does not occur. sent14: that the cellulosidness happens but the entertainment does not occur is not true if the fact that the priming pleomorphism does not occur is correct. sent15: if the postmeridianness does not occur that the priming pleomorphism happens but the gating cocobolo does not occur hold. sent16: if the fact that the waning does not occur hold the gating monoculture and the dumpiness occurs. sent17: that both the speech and the non-Tantricness occurs prevents that the achromatizing mayhaw occurs. sent18: the demarche does not occur if the vestal occurs but the azoticness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the priming pleomorphism does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cellulosidness happens and the entertainment does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the gating cocobolo occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the priming pleomorphism happens.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the priming pleomorphism happens and the postmeridianness happens.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the bethinking occurs.
sent18 & sent9 -> int6: the demarche does not occur.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the speech occurs and the conviction occurs.; int7 -> int8: the speech occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the bethinking occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that both the dumpiness and the surficialness happens is false then the surficialness does not occur. sent2: that the dumpiness and the surficialness happens is false if the gating monoculture does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the surficialness does not occur hold the fact that the achromatizing washroom happens and the bethinking occurs is false. sent4: the gating cocobolo occurs if that the cellulosidness but not the entertainment occurs is not correct. sent5: if the priming pleomorphism occurs and the postmeridianness occurs then the bethinking does not occur. sent6: if that the demarche does not occur is not false the speech happens and the conviction occurs. sent7: that the gating cocobolo does not occur is true. sent8: that the achromatizing mayhaw does not occur causes that the waning does not occur and the gating monoculture does not occur. sent9: both the vestalness and the non-azoticness happens. sent10: if the postmeridianness does not occur the gating cocobolo occurs and/or the priming pleomorphism happens. sent11: the postmeridianness occurs. sent12: that the waning does not occur is triggered by that the speech does not occur and the achromatizing mayhaw does not occur. sent13: that the postmeridianness does not occur and the achromatizing washroom does not occur is triggered by that the surficialness does not occur. sent14: that the cellulosidness happens but the entertainment does not occur is not true if the fact that the priming pleomorphism does not occur is correct. sent15: if the postmeridianness does not occur that the priming pleomorphism happens but the gating cocobolo does not occur hold. sent16: if the fact that the waning does not occur hold the gating monoculture and the dumpiness occurs. sent17: that both the speech and the non-Tantricness occurs prevents that the achromatizing mayhaw occurs. sent18: the demarche does not occur if the vestal occurs but the azoticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the priming pleomorphism does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cellulosidness happens and the entertainment does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the gating cocobolo occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the priming pleomorphism happens.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the priming pleomorphism happens and the postmeridianness happens.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__