that the non-full-timeness and the non-greaterness occurs is not false.
sent1: the ornamentalism happens. sent2: the transitionalness does not occur. sent3: that the ornamentalism happens prevents that the hoist does not occur. sent4: the chirpiness does not occur if the fragmenting carpal does not occur. sent5: the fault does not occur and the ministry does not occur if the electrostaticsness does not occur. sent6: if the impersonating occurs the fact that the Russianness does not occur and the hoist does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impersonating occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the Russianness does not occur and the hoisting does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the hoist does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int3: the hoisting happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the impersonating does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the non-full-timeness and the non-greaterness occurs is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the ornamentalism happens. sent2: the transitionalness does not occur. sent3: that the ornamentalism happens prevents that the hoist does not occur. sent4: the chirpiness does not occur if the fragmenting carpal does not occur. sent5: the fault does not occur and the ministry does not occur if the electrostaticsness does not occur. sent6: if the impersonating occurs the fact that the Russianness does not occur and the hoist does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impersonating occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the Russianness does not occur and the hoisting does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the hoist does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int3: the hoisting happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the impersonating does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__