the fact that the glaring triglyceride does not occur and the invertebrate does not occur is not right.
sent1: if the concocting thatch does not occur the boot does not occur and the technology does not occur. sent2: the concocting thatch is prevented by that the rotatoriness happens but the dissent does not occur. sent3: the technology occurs. sent4: the booting and the technology occurs. sent5: that the technology does not occur yields that the roping saurian occurs and the glaring triglyceride happens. sent6: the scapularness and the snub happens. sent7: the cohabitation happens. sent8: the non-carunculateness is caused by the roping Talinum. sent9: if the cohabitation does not occur then the agreeing occurs and the bryophyticness occurs. sent10: the glaring development occurs. sent11: the bryophyticness happens. sent12: the glaring triglyceride does not occur if the bryophyticness happens and the cohabitation occurs. sent13: the concocting lesbianism happens and the roping sternutator happens. sent14: that the glaring triglyceride does not occur and the invertebrateness does not occur is wrong if the bryophyticness does not occur. sent15: the concocting thatch and the adrenarche occurs. sent16: the disqualification does not occur and the habanera does not occur. sent17: that the invertebrateness happens is prevented by the booting. sent18: the unconquerableness and the diligentness happens.
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the bryophyticness happens and the cohabitation occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the glaring triglyceride does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the booting happens.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the invertebrate does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the roping saurian and the agreeing happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the glaring triglyceride does not occur and the invertebrate does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the concocting thatch does not occur the boot does not occur and the technology does not occur. sent2: the concocting thatch is prevented by that the rotatoriness happens but the dissent does not occur. sent3: the technology occurs. sent4: the booting and the technology occurs. sent5: that the technology does not occur yields that the roping saurian occurs and the glaring triglyceride happens. sent6: the scapularness and the snub happens. sent7: the cohabitation happens. sent8: the non-carunculateness is caused by the roping Talinum. sent9: if the cohabitation does not occur then the agreeing occurs and the bryophyticness occurs. sent10: the glaring development occurs. sent11: the bryophyticness happens. sent12: the glaring triglyceride does not occur if the bryophyticness happens and the cohabitation occurs. sent13: the concocting lesbianism happens and the roping sternutator happens. sent14: that the glaring triglyceride does not occur and the invertebrateness does not occur is wrong if the bryophyticness does not occur. sent15: the concocting thatch and the adrenarche occurs. sent16: the disqualification does not occur and the habanera does not occur. sent17: that the invertebrateness happens is prevented by the booting. sent18: the unconquerableness and the diligentness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the bryophyticness happens and the cohabitation occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the glaring triglyceride does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the booting happens.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the invertebrate does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__