not the parlaying but the immortalizing sprawl occurs.
sent1: that the abdominal does not occur and the phase-out does not occur causes that the cooing fogbank does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the parlaying and the immortalizing sprawl happens does not hold if the pinch does not occur. sent3: the carunculateness happens and the Sumerian happens. sent4: the immortalizing browallia does not occur. sent5: the cooing fogbank happens and the abdominalness happens. sent6: that not the parlay but the immortalizing sprawl occurs is not right if the pinch does not occur. sent7: that the immortalizing Cambrian does not occur is prevented by that the violence but not the expanding occurs. sent8: if the acidimetricness happens then the amitoticness does not occur. sent9: the amitoticness does not occur. sent10: that the cooing fogbank does not occur results in that the parlaying does not occur but the immortalizing sprawl happens. sent11: the transpolarness happens and the gastrostomy occurs. sent12: the acidimetricness yields that the ribbing century does not occur and the amitoticness does not occur. sent13: if the abdominalness occurs the phase-out happens. sent14: the ribbing buttercup occurs. sent15: that the amitoticness and the abdominal happens is not correct. sent16: that not the couple but the counterglow happens is incorrect if the roughing does not occur. sent17: both the non-accommodativeness and the non-transpolarness happens if the horseplay occurs. sent18: that the pinching occurs and the phase-out occurs leads to that the immortalizing touch-typist does not occur. sent19: the arming happens. sent20: if that both the pinching and the immortalizing touch-typist occurs is not wrong then the parlay does not occur. sent21: the fact that the parlaying happens and the immortalizing sprawl happens does not hold. sent22: the immortalizing touch-typist happens if the ribbing century does not occur and the amitoticness occurs. sent23: the acidimetricness happens. sent24: the fact that the immortalizing touch-typist occurs is correct if the ribbing century does not occur and the amitoticness does not occur. sent25: the fact that not the cooing petabit but the ribbing buttercup happens is not true.
sent5 -> int1: the abdominalness happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the phase-out occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pinching occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the pinch and the phase-out occurs.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the immortalizing touch-typist does not occur.; sent12 & sent23 -> int5: the fact that the ribbing century does not occur and the amitoticness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent24 & int5 -> int6: the immortalizing touch-typist happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the pinching does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
not the parlaying but the immortalizing sprawl happens.
$hypothesis$ = not the parlaying but the immortalizing sprawl occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the abdominal does not occur and the phase-out does not occur causes that the cooing fogbank does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the parlaying and the immortalizing sprawl happens does not hold if the pinch does not occur. sent3: the carunculateness happens and the Sumerian happens. sent4: the immortalizing browallia does not occur. sent5: the cooing fogbank happens and the abdominalness happens. sent6: that not the parlay but the immortalizing sprawl occurs is not right if the pinch does not occur. sent7: that the immortalizing Cambrian does not occur is prevented by that the violence but not the expanding occurs. sent8: if the acidimetricness happens then the amitoticness does not occur. sent9: the amitoticness does not occur. sent10: that the cooing fogbank does not occur results in that the parlaying does not occur but the immortalizing sprawl happens. sent11: the transpolarness happens and the gastrostomy occurs. sent12: the acidimetricness yields that the ribbing century does not occur and the amitoticness does not occur. sent13: if the abdominalness occurs the phase-out happens. sent14: the ribbing buttercup occurs. sent15: that the amitoticness and the abdominal happens is not correct. sent16: that not the couple but the counterglow happens is incorrect if the roughing does not occur. sent17: both the non-accommodativeness and the non-transpolarness happens if the horseplay occurs. sent18: that the pinching occurs and the phase-out occurs leads to that the immortalizing touch-typist does not occur. sent19: the arming happens. sent20: if that both the pinching and the immortalizing touch-typist occurs is not wrong then the parlay does not occur. sent21: the fact that the parlaying happens and the immortalizing sprawl happens does not hold. sent22: the immortalizing touch-typist happens if the ribbing century does not occur and the amitoticness occurs. sent23: the acidimetricness happens. sent24: the fact that the immortalizing touch-typist occurs is correct if the ribbing century does not occur and the amitoticness does not occur. sent25: the fact that not the cooing petabit but the ribbing buttercup happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the abdominalness happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the phase-out occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pinching occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the pinch and the phase-out occurs.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the immortalizing touch-typist does not occur.; sent12 & sent23 -> int5: the fact that the ribbing century does not occur and the amitoticness does not occur is not incorrect.; sent24 & int5 -> int6: the immortalizing touch-typist happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the pinching does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__