the hungering does not occur.
sent1: that the Hollywoodness occurs causes the visitation. sent2: the commutating workforce happens. sent3: the rivaling pyrilamine happens if the visitation happens. sent4: that the wieldiness does not occur causes the non-fernlessness and/or the drafting. sent5: the obstructionism does not occur and the perfidy does not occur if the commutating pyrograph does not occur. sent6: the prerequisite and the leg happens. sent7: the pteridologicalness does not occur. sent8: the commutating annexation does not occur. sent9: the commutating pyrograph does not occur if the unostentatiousness does not occur. sent10: the PIN does not occur. sent11: if the walk-through does not occur the rivaling inheritance happens and/or the rivaling pyrilamine does not occur. sent12: the fact that the fernlessness does not occur is true. sent13: the Hollywoodness occurs. sent14: the unostentatiousness does not occur if the inquiry and the non-pteridologicalness happens. sent15: the rivaling emirate and the inquiry happens if the commutating annexation does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the rivaling pyrilamine happens and the rivaling inheritance occurs is correct then the hungering does not occur. sent17: the fernedness brings about that the rivaling inheritance and the walk-through occurs. sent18: that the walk-through does not occur is prevented by that the fernlessness does not occur. sent19: if the perfidy does not occur then that not the hydraulicness but the rivaling jujutsu occurs is incorrect. sent20: the rainstorm does not occur. sent21: the wieldiness does not occur if the fact that both the non-hydraulicness and the rivaling jujutsu occurs does not hold.
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the visitation happens is right.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the rivaling pyrilamine occurs.; sent17 & sent12 -> int3: both the rivaling inheritance and the walk-through occurs.; int3 -> int4: the rivaling inheritance happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the rivaling pyrilamine and the rivaling inheritance occurs.; int5 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the hunger occurs.
sent15 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the rivaling emirate happens and the inquiry happens is not wrong.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the inquiry happens is true.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: both the inquiry and the non-pteridologicalness occurs.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the unostentatiousness does not occur.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the commutating pyrograph does not occur.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the obstructionism does not occur and the perfidy does not occur.; int11 -> int12: the perfidy does not occur.; sent19 & int12 -> int13: that both the non-hydraulicness and the rivaling jujutsu occurs is not correct.; sent21 & int13 -> int14: the wieldiness does not occur.; sent4 & int14 -> int15: the non-fernlessness or the draft or both occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the hungering does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Hollywoodness occurs causes the visitation. sent2: the commutating workforce happens. sent3: the rivaling pyrilamine happens if the visitation happens. sent4: that the wieldiness does not occur causes the non-fernlessness and/or the drafting. sent5: the obstructionism does not occur and the perfidy does not occur if the commutating pyrograph does not occur. sent6: the prerequisite and the leg happens. sent7: the pteridologicalness does not occur. sent8: the commutating annexation does not occur. sent9: the commutating pyrograph does not occur if the unostentatiousness does not occur. sent10: the PIN does not occur. sent11: if the walk-through does not occur the rivaling inheritance happens and/or the rivaling pyrilamine does not occur. sent12: the fact that the fernlessness does not occur is true. sent13: the Hollywoodness occurs. sent14: the unostentatiousness does not occur if the inquiry and the non-pteridologicalness happens. sent15: the rivaling emirate and the inquiry happens if the commutating annexation does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the rivaling pyrilamine happens and the rivaling inheritance occurs is correct then the hungering does not occur. sent17: the fernedness brings about that the rivaling inheritance and the walk-through occurs. sent18: that the walk-through does not occur is prevented by that the fernlessness does not occur. sent19: if the perfidy does not occur then that not the hydraulicness but the rivaling jujutsu occurs is incorrect. sent20: the rainstorm does not occur. sent21: the wieldiness does not occur if the fact that both the non-hydraulicness and the rivaling jujutsu occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the visitation happens is right.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the rivaling pyrilamine occurs.; sent17 & sent12 -> int3: both the rivaling inheritance and the walk-through occurs.; int3 -> int4: the rivaling inheritance happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the rivaling pyrilamine and the rivaling inheritance occurs.; int5 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__