the crofter does descant.
sent1: if the RBC is a Mongolian the crofter is a descant. sent2: something is not a kind of a polyethylene or it flushes or both. sent3: if something is not bipolar then the palette is a kind of a Zionism. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Garrick and/or it is a syllogism does not hold. sent5: the RBC is a kind of a Mongolian if there exists something such that that either it is not a kind of a polyethylene or it is a flushed or both is false. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it either is a kind of a polyethylene or is a flushed or both is wrong the RBC is Mongolian. sent7: if the genitor is bipolar and is a Zionism then the auteur is not a kind of a flushed. sent8: there exists something such that it is a polyethylene. sent9: if the genitor is locker-room then the palette is not broadband. sent10: if that something is not a Mongolian is true then that it is not a polyethylene and it severalizes chaplaincy does not hold. sent11: if something severalizes chaplaincy then it is a polyethylene. sent12: the fact that the genitor is not non-locker-room and it is an astronaut is not true. sent13: that the genitor is not locker-room but an astronaut is not right if the auteur does not severalize chaplaincy. sent14: there is something such that that it does not madden and is bipolar is not correct. sent15: if the fact that the genitor is not locker-room but it is an astronaut is not right then the palette is not broadband. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not madden and it is bipolar is not right then that the palette is a Zionism is not wrong. sent17: the fact that the auteur is a kind of the polyethylene if the auteur does severalize chaplaincy is not incorrect. sent18: if something is a Zionism then it is broadband. sent19: there is something such that it does not madden and is not non-bipolar. sent20: if something does severalize chaplaincy then that it is not a kind of a polyethylene or it is a flushed or both is wrong. sent21: the fact that the crofter is broadband is not incorrect if there exists something such that it does not flush. sent22: there exists something such that that it maddens and is bipolar is not true. sent23: that that the auteur is not a flushed and is locker-room is incorrect is not wrong. sent24: if a broadband thing does not severalize chaplaincy then it is not a descant. sent25: the auteur is a kind of a polyethylene. sent26: the fact that that the genitor is both locker-room and an astronaut hold does not hold if the auteur does not severalize chaplaincy. sent27: the palette is a flushed.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the auteur does not severalize chaplaincy.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: that the genitor is not locker-room and is a kind of an astronaut is not right.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the palette is not broadband.; sent18 -> int3: if the palette is a kind of a Zionism it is broadband.; sent14 & sent16 -> int4: the palette is a Zionism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the palette is broadband.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the auteur severalizes chaplaincy.; sent20 -> int8: if the auteur does severalize chaplaincy then that it is not a polyethylene or it is a flushed or both is not correct.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the fact that either the auteur is not a polyethylene or it flushes or both is not incorrect is false.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is not a polyethylene or is a flushed or both does not hold.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the RBC is a Mongolian.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the crofter is not a kind of a descant.
sent24 -> int12: the crofter does not descant if it is broadband and does not severalize chaplaincy.; sent10 -> int13: that the crofter is not a polyethylene but it severalizes chaplaincy is wrong if it is not a kind of a Mongolian.;
$hypothesis$ = the crofter does descant. ; $context$ = sent1: if the RBC is a Mongolian the crofter is a descant. sent2: something is not a kind of a polyethylene or it flushes or both. sent3: if something is not bipolar then the palette is a kind of a Zionism. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Garrick and/or it is a syllogism does not hold. sent5: the RBC is a kind of a Mongolian if there exists something such that that either it is not a kind of a polyethylene or it is a flushed or both is false. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it either is a kind of a polyethylene or is a flushed or both is wrong the RBC is Mongolian. sent7: if the genitor is bipolar and is a Zionism then the auteur is not a kind of a flushed. sent8: there exists something such that it is a polyethylene. sent9: if the genitor is locker-room then the palette is not broadband. sent10: if that something is not a Mongolian is true then that it is not a polyethylene and it severalizes chaplaincy does not hold. sent11: if something severalizes chaplaincy then it is a polyethylene. sent12: the fact that the genitor is not non-locker-room and it is an astronaut is not true. sent13: that the genitor is not locker-room but an astronaut is not right if the auteur does not severalize chaplaincy. sent14: there is something such that that it does not madden and is bipolar is not correct. sent15: if the fact that the genitor is not locker-room but it is an astronaut is not right then the palette is not broadband. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not madden and it is bipolar is not right then that the palette is a Zionism is not wrong. sent17: the fact that the auteur is a kind of the polyethylene if the auteur does severalize chaplaincy is not incorrect. sent18: if something is a Zionism then it is broadband. sent19: there is something such that it does not madden and is not non-bipolar. sent20: if something does severalize chaplaincy then that it is not a kind of a polyethylene or it is a flushed or both is wrong. sent21: the fact that the crofter is broadband is not incorrect if there exists something such that it does not flush. sent22: there exists something such that that it maddens and is bipolar is not true. sent23: that that the auteur is not a flushed and is locker-room is incorrect is not wrong. sent24: if a broadband thing does not severalize chaplaincy then it is not a descant. sent25: the auteur is a kind of a polyethylene. sent26: the fact that that the genitor is both locker-room and an astronaut hold does not hold if the auteur does not severalize chaplaincy. sent27: the palette is a flushed. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the auteur does not severalize chaplaincy.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: that the genitor is not locker-room and is a kind of an astronaut is not right.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the palette is not broadband.; sent18 -> int3: if the palette is a kind of a Zionism it is broadband.; sent14 & sent16 -> int4: the palette is a Zionism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the palette is broadband.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the auteur severalizes chaplaincy.; sent20 -> int8: if the auteur does severalize chaplaincy then that it is not a polyethylene or it is a flushed or both is not correct.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the fact that either the auteur is not a polyethylene or it flushes or both is not incorrect is false.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is not a polyethylene or is a flushed or both does not hold.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the RBC is a Mongolian.; int11 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__