the habiting associate does not occur.
sent1: the blue-collarness happens. sent2: if the despairing windsock occurs that the habiting associate occurs is correct. sent3: the rustling Stael happens. sent4: the illativeness happens. sent5: the fact that the footfall occurs is true. sent6: both the biauricularness and the ableness happens. sent7: that the despairing radiography happens and the bout occurs is brought about by the non-profanedness. sent8: that the despairing radiography happens causes that the favoritism does not occur and the overload does not occur. sent9: the despairing windsock and the rustling Stael occurs. sent10: that both the erythropoieticness and the despairing windsock occurs is not true if the favoritism does not occur. sent11: that the permeableness happens yields that the nursing occurs. sent12: if the fact that the profanedness happens and the amminoness happens is false the fact that the profanedness does not occur hold. sent13: the apothegmaticness happens. sent14: if the fact that the erythropoieticness happens and the despairing windsock happens does not hold the despairing windsock does not occur. sent15: if that the vagalness happens is true the abstracting happens. sent16: if the despairing windsock does not occur then the fact that the rustling Stael does not occur but the habiting associate occurs is not correct. sent17: the monitoring occurs. sent18: that the supervention occurs and the flapping occurs is not incorrect. sent19: if the rehearsal happens the despairing Cocteau happens. sent20: the fact that the referencing occurs is true.
sent9 -> int1: the despairing windsock happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the habiting associate does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the habiting associate does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the blue-collarness happens. sent2: if the despairing windsock occurs that the habiting associate occurs is correct. sent3: the rustling Stael happens. sent4: the illativeness happens. sent5: the fact that the footfall occurs is true. sent6: both the biauricularness and the ableness happens. sent7: that the despairing radiography happens and the bout occurs is brought about by the non-profanedness. sent8: that the despairing radiography happens causes that the favoritism does not occur and the overload does not occur. sent9: the despairing windsock and the rustling Stael occurs. sent10: that both the erythropoieticness and the despairing windsock occurs is not true if the favoritism does not occur. sent11: that the permeableness happens yields that the nursing occurs. sent12: if the fact that the profanedness happens and the amminoness happens is false the fact that the profanedness does not occur hold. sent13: the apothegmaticness happens. sent14: if the fact that the erythropoieticness happens and the despairing windsock happens does not hold the despairing windsock does not occur. sent15: if that the vagalness happens is true the abstracting happens. sent16: if the despairing windsock does not occur then the fact that the rustling Stael does not occur but the habiting associate occurs is not correct. sent17: the monitoring occurs. sent18: that the supervention occurs and the flapping occurs is not incorrect. sent19: if the rehearsal happens the despairing Cocteau happens. sent20: the fact that the referencing occurs is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the despairing windsock happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__