the Basotho is not apologetics.
sent1: there exists something such that it is irresolute. sent2: that the cruiserweight is not inextinguishable is not wrong. sent3: the Pomo leaps Pomo if the fact that the Basotho is extinguishable but not Italic is wrong. sent4: the Basotho is extinguishable if the fact that the fact that the Pomo does leap Pomo but it is not apologetics is not right is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the Pomo is extinguishable but it is not apologetics is not right. sent6: if the Pomo is not extinguishable then the Basotho does leap Pomo. sent7: the fact that the Pomo is extinguishable but it is not a Italic is not true if something is irresolute. sent8: the tumble-dryer is apologetics. sent9: that the Basotho is not non-apologetics but it does not leap Pomo is not true if there is something such that it is Italic. sent10: if the fact that the Pomo is a kind of extinguishable thing that is not a Italic is not true then the Basotho leaps Pomo. sent11: that the Basotho is not non-Italic is not incorrect if the fact that the Pomo is extinguishable but it does not leap Pomo is not true. sent12: if the fact that the Basotho leaps Pomo and is not a Italic is incorrect then the Pomo is extinguishable. sent13: the fact that the fact that the Pomo is a Italic but it is not apologetics does not hold is true if something leaps Pomo. sent14: the Basotho is a coronation. sent15: if the Basotho leaps Pomo it is apologetics. sent16: the Basotho is extinguishable. sent17: the Basotho is a Italic. sent18: the Pomo is apologetics. sent19: the Basotho does dangle capacitor if it guggles angered.
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: that the Pomo is both not inextinguishable and not Italic is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the Basotho leaps Pomo.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Basotho is not apologetics. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is irresolute. sent2: that the cruiserweight is not inextinguishable is not wrong. sent3: the Pomo leaps Pomo if the fact that the Basotho is extinguishable but not Italic is wrong. sent4: the Basotho is extinguishable if the fact that the fact that the Pomo does leap Pomo but it is not apologetics is not right is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the Pomo is extinguishable but it is not apologetics is not right. sent6: if the Pomo is not extinguishable then the Basotho does leap Pomo. sent7: the fact that the Pomo is extinguishable but it is not a Italic is not true if something is irresolute. sent8: the tumble-dryer is apologetics. sent9: that the Basotho is not non-apologetics but it does not leap Pomo is not true if there is something such that it is Italic. sent10: if the fact that the Pomo is a kind of extinguishable thing that is not a Italic is not true then the Basotho leaps Pomo. sent11: that the Basotho is not non-Italic is not incorrect if the fact that the Pomo is extinguishable but it does not leap Pomo is not true. sent12: if the fact that the Basotho leaps Pomo and is not a Italic is incorrect then the Pomo is extinguishable. sent13: the fact that the fact that the Pomo is a Italic but it is not apologetics does not hold is true if something leaps Pomo. sent14: the Basotho is a coronation. sent15: if the Basotho leaps Pomo it is apologetics. sent16: the Basotho is extinguishable. sent17: the Basotho is a Italic. sent18: the Pomo is apologetics. sent19: the Basotho does dangle capacitor if it guggles angered. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: that the Pomo is both not inextinguishable and not Italic is false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the Basotho leaps Pomo.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__