the Cree does cloy BMDO.
sent1: the inositol is a kind of a chromatin. sent2: if there is something such that it approbates IMF or is a kind of a conservatory or both the flicker is a totality. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is abstract is true. sent4: there are .22-caliber things. sent5: if there is something such that it approbates IMF or underquotes Dipodidae or both then the inositol is not a hurrah. sent6: the Cree does cloy BMDO if there exists something such that it is a rose-root and/or it is a stereotype. sent7: if something does underquote Dipodidae and does not approbate IMF the Cree does not cloy BMDO. sent8: if that either the inositol is a conservatory or it is not a rose-root or both is false it is a stereotype. sent9: if something that is not a totality is not a kind of a conservatory it does approbate Menura. sent10: something is a hurrah if it does approbate Menura. sent11: the pi does not approbate Menura if the inositol is not a hurrah. sent12: something is a stereotype if the fact that it does not approbate IMF is not wrong. sent13: if the inositol is a stereotype the fact that it approbates Menura is right. sent14: if there exists something such that it approbates IMF the Cree does not cloy BMDO and it is not a stereotype. sent15: the pi does approbate Menura if it is not a rose-root and it does not underquote Dipodidae. sent16: the flicker is a rose-root if it does not approbate IMF and does cloy BMDO. sent17: the inositol is not a totality. sent18: if there is something such that it is .22-caliber then the pi is not a totality and it is not a conservatory. sent19: if something that does not approbate IMF is not a kind of a conservatory then it does cloy BMDO. sent20: the Cree cloys BMDO if it is not a conservatory and does approbate Menura. sent21: if something is a kind of a conservatory and/or is a stereotype then the flicker does not hurrah.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flicker approbates IMF.; assump1 -> int1: either the flicker does approbate IMF or it underquotes Dipodidae or both.; int1 -> int2: that something does approbate IMF or underquotes Dipodidae or both is right.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the inositol does not hurrah is not incorrect.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the pi does not approbate Menura.; sent9 -> int5: that the pi approbates Menura is true if it is not a totality and not a conservatory.; sent4 & sent18 -> int6: the pi is not a totality and it is not a conservatory.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the pi does approbate Menura.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the flicker does not approbate IMF.; sent12 -> int10: if the flicker does not approbate IMF then it is a stereotype.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the flicker is a kind of a stereotype.; int11 -> int12: the flicker is a rose-root and/or it is a stereotype.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is a rose-root or is a kind of a stereotype or both.; int13 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Cree does not cloy BMDO hold.
sent10 -> int14: the inositol is a hurrah if it approbates Menura.;
$hypothesis$ = the Cree does cloy BMDO. ; $context$ = sent1: the inositol is a kind of a chromatin. sent2: if there is something such that it approbates IMF or is a kind of a conservatory or both the flicker is a totality. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is abstract is true. sent4: there are .22-caliber things. sent5: if there is something such that it approbates IMF or underquotes Dipodidae or both then the inositol is not a hurrah. sent6: the Cree does cloy BMDO if there exists something such that it is a rose-root and/or it is a stereotype. sent7: if something does underquote Dipodidae and does not approbate IMF the Cree does not cloy BMDO. sent8: if that either the inositol is a conservatory or it is not a rose-root or both is false it is a stereotype. sent9: if something that is not a totality is not a kind of a conservatory it does approbate Menura. sent10: something is a hurrah if it does approbate Menura. sent11: the pi does not approbate Menura if the inositol is not a hurrah. sent12: something is a stereotype if the fact that it does not approbate IMF is not wrong. sent13: if the inositol is a stereotype the fact that it approbates Menura is right. sent14: if there exists something such that it approbates IMF the Cree does not cloy BMDO and it is not a stereotype. sent15: the pi does approbate Menura if it is not a rose-root and it does not underquote Dipodidae. sent16: the flicker is a rose-root if it does not approbate IMF and does cloy BMDO. sent17: the inositol is not a totality. sent18: if there is something such that it is .22-caliber then the pi is not a totality and it is not a conservatory. sent19: if something that does not approbate IMF is not a kind of a conservatory then it does cloy BMDO. sent20: the Cree cloys BMDO if it is not a conservatory and does approbate Menura. sent21: if something is a kind of a conservatory and/or is a stereotype then the flicker does not hurrah. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flicker approbates IMF.; assump1 -> int1: either the flicker does approbate IMF or it underquotes Dipodidae or both.; int1 -> int2: that something does approbate IMF or underquotes Dipodidae or both is right.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the inositol does not hurrah is not incorrect.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the pi does not approbate Menura.; sent9 -> int5: that the pi approbates Menura is true if it is not a totality and not a conservatory.; sent4 & sent18 -> int6: the pi is not a totality and it is not a conservatory.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the pi does approbate Menura.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the flicker does not approbate IMF.; sent12 -> int10: if the flicker does not approbate IMF then it is a stereotype.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the flicker is a kind of a stereotype.; int11 -> int12: the flicker is a rose-root and/or it is a stereotype.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is a rose-root or is a kind of a stereotype or both.; int13 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__