the carrel is metamorphic.
sent1: the fact that the sob does not bottle if the virion is decorous thing that is not bolometric is correct. sent2: if the virion is decorous and bolometric the sob is not a bottle. sent3: if the sob is not a kind of a bottle then that the carrel is carbocyclic and a bottle does not hold. sent4: if that the bonesetter is not bolometric is right then the virion is decorous but it is not bolometric. sent5: that that the bonesetter is a kind of a thaumatolatry and/or it is not an icebreaker does not hold is not wrong. sent6: if the virion is metamorphic the bonesetter is metamorphic. sent7: that if the bonesetter is not bolometric the virion is not bolometric is right. sent8: something that is not a kind of a bottle is not metamorphic. sent9: if the bonesetter is not bolometric and not a bottle then the disputant is not decorous. sent10: something is metamorphic if it bottles. sent11: if the carrel is not a bottle then it is not metamorphic. sent12: the bonesetter is not bolometric if the fact that it is a thaumatolatry and/or not an icebreaker is incorrect. sent13: something is decorous and it is carbocyclic if it is not a skidpan. sent14: the virion is not bolometric. sent15: if the fact that something is a kind of carbocyclic thing that bottles is not true it is not metamorphic.
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the bonesetter is not bolometric hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the virion is decorous but it is not bolometric.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the sob does not bottle.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that that the carrel is carbocyclic and it does bottle is not right is not wrong.; sent15 -> int5: if the fact that the carrel is carbocyclic and it bottles does not hold then it is not metamorphic.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the carrel is metamorphic.
sent10 -> int6: if the carrel is a bottle then it is metamorphic.; sent13 -> int7: the bonesetter is decorous and it is carbocyclic if it is not a skidpan.;
$hypothesis$ = the carrel is metamorphic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the sob does not bottle if the virion is decorous thing that is not bolometric is correct. sent2: if the virion is decorous and bolometric the sob is not a bottle. sent3: if the sob is not a kind of a bottle then that the carrel is carbocyclic and a bottle does not hold. sent4: if that the bonesetter is not bolometric is right then the virion is decorous but it is not bolometric. sent5: that that the bonesetter is a kind of a thaumatolatry and/or it is not an icebreaker does not hold is not wrong. sent6: if the virion is metamorphic the bonesetter is metamorphic. sent7: that if the bonesetter is not bolometric the virion is not bolometric is right. sent8: something that is not a kind of a bottle is not metamorphic. sent9: if the bonesetter is not bolometric and not a bottle then the disputant is not decorous. sent10: something is metamorphic if it bottles. sent11: if the carrel is not a bottle then it is not metamorphic. sent12: the bonesetter is not bolometric if the fact that it is a thaumatolatry and/or not an icebreaker is incorrect. sent13: something is decorous and it is carbocyclic if it is not a skidpan. sent14: the virion is not bolometric. sent15: if the fact that something is a kind of carbocyclic thing that bottles is not true it is not metamorphic. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the bonesetter is not bolometric hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the virion is decorous but it is not bolometric.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the sob does not bottle.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that that the carrel is carbocyclic and it does bottle is not right is not wrong.; sent15 -> int5: if the fact that the carrel is carbocyclic and it bottles does not hold then it is not metamorphic.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__