the batman is Sisyphean.
sent1: the taffrail is not an increasing if it is a Stalinist and does not fingerprint gatepost. sent2: the batman catalyzes haloalkane if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Stalinist and it is non-Sisyphean does not hold. sent3: if the lodge does not catalyze scourer it slices sawwort and it is not a kind of a grit. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does instrument ambusher and slices taffrail hold is not correct is not wrong. sent5: if there is something such that it does catalyze haloalkane the batman is Sisyphean. sent6: if something does not increase that it does slice sawwort and does not catalyze haloalkane does not hold. sent7: if something does not catalyze haloalkane it is not Sisyphean. sent8: that the taffrail is a Stalinist but it does not fingerprint gatepost hold. sent9: if there is something such that that it slices sawwort and it does not catalyze haloalkane does not hold then the batman is Sisyphean.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the taffrail is not an increasing.; sent6 -> int2: that the taffrail does slice sawwort and does not catalyze haloalkane is not true if that it is not an increasing is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the taffrail slices sawwort but it does not catalyze haloalkane is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it slices sawwort and it does not catalyze haloalkane is incorrect.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the batman is not Sisyphean.
sent7 -> int5: if the fact that the batman does not catalyze haloalkane is not false then it is not Sisyphean.;
$hypothesis$ = the batman is Sisyphean. ; $context$ = sent1: the taffrail is not an increasing if it is a Stalinist and does not fingerprint gatepost. sent2: the batman catalyzes haloalkane if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Stalinist and it is non-Sisyphean does not hold. sent3: if the lodge does not catalyze scourer it slices sawwort and it is not a kind of a grit. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does instrument ambusher and slices taffrail hold is not correct is not wrong. sent5: if there is something such that it does catalyze haloalkane the batman is Sisyphean. sent6: if something does not increase that it does slice sawwort and does not catalyze haloalkane does not hold. sent7: if something does not catalyze haloalkane it is not Sisyphean. sent8: that the taffrail is a Stalinist but it does not fingerprint gatepost hold. sent9: if there is something such that that it slices sawwort and it does not catalyze haloalkane does not hold then the batman is Sisyphean. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the taffrail is not an increasing.; sent6 -> int2: that the taffrail does slice sawwort and does not catalyze haloalkane is not true if that it is not an increasing is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the taffrail slices sawwort but it does not catalyze haloalkane is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it slices sawwort and it does not catalyze haloalkane is incorrect.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__