the tanning is husbandly.
sent1: if the Levantine does not show that it is a neoliberalism and it does fit mnemonist does not hold. sent2: the Levantine is not a show if the fact that either it is a kind of a dogtrot or it does radiate or both is not right. sent3: if that something does fit mnemonist and is not a kind of a neoliberalism is wrong then it does not fit mnemonist. sent4: the fact that the Levantine does show and is not on-site is false if the hydrocortisone does not fit mnemonist. sent5: if something does not show the fact that it is a kind of a neoliberalism that does fit mnemonist is wrong. sent6: something is not a kind of a show if that it is not a dogtrot and/or it does radiate is false. sent7: if that the Levantine is not on-site is correct then the fact that it is not a dogtrot or it radiates or both is not right. sent8: if the hydrocortisone does contort Bloch that it fits mnemonist and it is not a kind of a neoliberalism is not true. sent9: if the Levantine is not on-site then it is a dogtrot. sent10: if the fact that the Levantine is not a neoliberalism and does fit mnemonist is not correct then the tanning is husbandly. sent11: the Levantine is a kind of a dogtrot. sent12: if the tanning is not allelic that it is either non-on-site or not non-feudatory or both is false. sent13: that the fact that the urinal does not bedizen urinal and/or it is a spathe is not right hold if it is not husbandly. sent14: if the Levantine is a kind of a neoliberalism then the tanning is husbandly. sent15: the premolar is husbandly. sent16: the Levantine is not on-site. sent17: if the fact that something is a dogtrot and/or it radiates is not right that it is not a kind of a show is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the Levantine is a kind of a neoliberalism and fits mnemonist is false.
sent7 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the Levantine is not a dogtrot and/or it does radiate is wrong.; sent6 -> int2: if the fact that the Levantine is not a kind of a dogtrot or it radiates or both does not hold it is not a show.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Levantine is not a kind of a show.;
the tanning is not husbandly.
sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the hydrocortisone fits mnemonist and is not a kind of a neoliberalism is wrong then it does not fits mnemonist.;
$hypothesis$ = the tanning is husbandly. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Levantine does not show that it is a neoliberalism and it does fit mnemonist does not hold. sent2: the Levantine is not a show if the fact that either it is a kind of a dogtrot or it does radiate or both is not right. sent3: if that something does fit mnemonist and is not a kind of a neoliberalism is wrong then it does not fit mnemonist. sent4: the fact that the Levantine does show and is not on-site is false if the hydrocortisone does not fit mnemonist. sent5: if something does not show the fact that it is a kind of a neoliberalism that does fit mnemonist is wrong. sent6: something is not a kind of a show if that it is not a dogtrot and/or it does radiate is false. sent7: if that the Levantine is not on-site is correct then the fact that it is not a dogtrot or it radiates or both is not right. sent8: if the hydrocortisone does contort Bloch that it fits mnemonist and it is not a kind of a neoliberalism is not true. sent9: if the Levantine is not on-site then it is a dogtrot. sent10: if the fact that the Levantine is not a neoliberalism and does fit mnemonist is not correct then the tanning is husbandly. sent11: the Levantine is a kind of a dogtrot. sent12: if the tanning is not allelic that it is either non-on-site or not non-feudatory or both is false. sent13: that the fact that the urinal does not bedizen urinal and/or it is a spathe is not right hold if it is not husbandly. sent14: if the Levantine is a kind of a neoliberalism then the tanning is husbandly. sent15: the premolar is husbandly. sent16: the Levantine is not on-site. sent17: if the fact that something is a dogtrot and/or it radiates is not right that it is not a kind of a show is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the Levantine is a kind of a neoliberalism and fits mnemonist is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the Levantine is not a dogtrot and/or it does radiate is wrong.; sent6 -> int2: if the fact that the Levantine is not a kind of a dogtrot or it radiates or both does not hold it is not a show.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Levantine is not a kind of a show.; __UNKNOWN__