the semiterrestrialness does not occur.
sent1: that not the fetish but the destructiveness happens does not hold if the spicateness happens. sent2: if that not the cloud but the alarmism occurs is not right the alarmism does not occur. sent3: if the dunning surcharge but not the pushup happens then the particulateness does not occur. sent4: that the eradication and the non-maturationalness occurs prevents the non-semiterrestrialness. sent5: that the fetish does not occur and the destructiveness happens is caused by that the propitiating does not occur. sent6: the no-brainer does not occur and the civilness does not occur if that the subdividing becket does not occur is true. sent7: if the maturationalness happens then that the propitiating does not occur is not wrong. sent8: if the particulateness does not occur then that the cloud does not occur but the alarmism occurs is false. sent9: the fetish causes that the destructiveness occurs. sent10: if the fact that the cryonicness happens and the reorientation does not occur is not true then the dunning Lepus does not occur. sent11: the alarmism happens. sent12: that the alarmism occurs prevents that the spicateness does not occur. sent13: the dunning surcharge happens and the pushup does not occur if the no-brainer does not occur. sent14: that the propitiating does not occur and the semiterrestrialness occurs is not true if the destructiveness happens. sent15: the propitiating does not occur if that the eradication and the non-maturationalness occurs is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the eradication occurs but the maturationalness does not occur is not right.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the propitiating does not occur is correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fetish does not occur but the destructiveness occurs.; sent12 & sent11 -> int3: that the spicateness happens is true.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that not the fetish but the destructiveness happens is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the eradication but not the maturationalness occurs.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the semiterrestrialness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the semiterrestrialness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the fetish but the destructiveness happens does not hold if the spicateness happens. sent2: if that not the cloud but the alarmism occurs is not right the alarmism does not occur. sent3: if the dunning surcharge but not the pushup happens then the particulateness does not occur. sent4: that the eradication and the non-maturationalness occurs prevents the non-semiterrestrialness. sent5: that the fetish does not occur and the destructiveness happens is caused by that the propitiating does not occur. sent6: the no-brainer does not occur and the civilness does not occur if that the subdividing becket does not occur is true. sent7: if the maturationalness happens then that the propitiating does not occur is not wrong. sent8: if the particulateness does not occur then that the cloud does not occur but the alarmism occurs is false. sent9: the fetish causes that the destructiveness occurs. sent10: if the fact that the cryonicness happens and the reorientation does not occur is not true then the dunning Lepus does not occur. sent11: the alarmism happens. sent12: that the alarmism occurs prevents that the spicateness does not occur. sent13: the dunning surcharge happens and the pushup does not occur if the no-brainer does not occur. sent14: that the propitiating does not occur and the semiterrestrialness occurs is not true if the destructiveness happens. sent15: the propitiating does not occur if that the eradication and the non-maturationalness occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the eradication occurs but the maturationalness does not occur is not right.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the propitiating does not occur is correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fetish does not occur but the destructiveness occurs.; sent12 & sent11 -> int3: that the spicateness happens is true.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that not the fetish but the destructiveness happens is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the eradication but not the maturationalness occurs.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__