the loxapine is white-collar.
sent1: the Lysol outstares ambulation if that the architect does not outstare GNP and is not a unwholesomeness does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the Lysol does outstare ambulation is right the loxapine is white-collar. sent3: if something restrains Tuvalu that it is not actinomycotic and is not nonproprietary is not correct. sent4: if the fact that something is both not secure and extensile is correct the propylthiouracil does restrain Tuvalu. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of insecure thing that is extensile. sent6: if the propylthiouracil does restrain Tuvalu then that the architect does not outstare GNP and is not a unwholesomeness does not hold.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the propylthiouracil does restrain Tuvalu.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the architect does not outstare GNP and is not a unwholesomeness does not hold.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Lysol does not outstare ambulation is false.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the Indianan is not actinomycotic and not nonproprietary is false.
sent3 -> int4: if the Indianan restrains Tuvalu then that it is not actinomycotic and not nonproprietary is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the loxapine is white-collar. ; $context$ = sent1: the Lysol outstares ambulation if that the architect does not outstare GNP and is not a unwholesomeness does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the Lysol does outstare ambulation is right the loxapine is white-collar. sent3: if something restrains Tuvalu that it is not actinomycotic and is not nonproprietary is not correct. sent4: if the fact that something is both not secure and extensile is correct the propylthiouracil does restrain Tuvalu. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of insecure thing that is extensile. sent6: if the propylthiouracil does restrain Tuvalu then that the architect does not outstare GNP and is not a unwholesomeness does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the propylthiouracil does restrain Tuvalu.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the architect does not outstare GNP and is not a unwholesomeness does not hold.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Lysol does not outstare ambulation is false.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__