the divide is not invertible if the analgesic does not strain weatherman.
sent1: if something is a clamp it does alibi Tachinidae. sent2: if something is not a kind of an amortization then the divide does not strain weatherman and is peripheral. sent3: the phalsa is a clamp if the squab is an amortization. sent4: if the squab is not an etymology then the analgesic is not an amortization. sent5: if the divide is a kind of a maxi it is not invertible. sent6: the analgesic is maxi. sent7: if the analgesic is a kind of an amortization that the squab is not an etymology and is an amortization is not true. sent8: if the analgesic does not strain weatherman the divide is invertible. sent9: if the fact that the analgesic offers loofah and does strain stylization is not correct then it does not offers loofah. sent10: the divide is invertible. sent11: that the divide is a maxi that does offer loofah is wrong. sent12: the fact that the divide is not a kind of a maxi and does offer loofah is not correct if the weatherman offer loofah. sent13: if the fact that that the divide is non-maxi thing that offers loofah is not wrong is not right it is not invertible. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a maxi and it does not offer loofah then the phalsa is an etymology. sent15: the analgesic is a kind of an etymology if the phalsa alibis Tachinidae. sent16: if the analgesic is not invertible the fact that it does offer loofah and does strain stylization does not hold. sent17: the analgesic is not invertible. sent18: that the divide is a maxi and it does offer loofah is not true if the weatherman does offer loofah. sent19: the divide is invertible if the fact that it is not a maxi and it does offer loofah is not right. sent20: if something offers loofah then it does clamp. sent21: the squab is a kind of an amortization.
sent3 & sent21 -> int1: the phalsa clamps.; sent1 -> int2: if the phalsa is a clamp then it does alibi Tachinidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the phalsa does alibi Tachinidae.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the analgesic is an etymology.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the analgesic does not strain weatherman.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the analgesic does not strain weatherman but it is an etymology.;
the divide does not strain weatherman but it is peripheral.
sent16 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the analgesic offers loofah and it strains stylization is not true.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the analgesic does not offer loofah.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the analgesic is a maxi but it does not offer loofah.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is a kind of maxi thing that does not offer loofah.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: the phalsa is a kind of an etymology.;
$hypothesis$ = the divide is not invertible if the analgesic does not strain weatherman. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a clamp it does alibi Tachinidae. sent2: if something is not a kind of an amortization then the divide does not strain weatherman and is peripheral. sent3: the phalsa is a clamp if the squab is an amortization. sent4: if the squab is not an etymology then the analgesic is not an amortization. sent5: if the divide is a kind of a maxi it is not invertible. sent6: the analgesic is maxi. sent7: if the analgesic is a kind of an amortization that the squab is not an etymology and is an amortization is not true. sent8: if the analgesic does not strain weatherman the divide is invertible. sent9: if the fact that the analgesic offers loofah and does strain stylization is not correct then it does not offers loofah. sent10: the divide is invertible. sent11: that the divide is a maxi that does offer loofah is wrong. sent12: the fact that the divide is not a kind of a maxi and does offer loofah is not correct if the weatherman offer loofah. sent13: if the fact that that the divide is non-maxi thing that offers loofah is not wrong is not right it is not invertible. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a maxi and it does not offer loofah then the phalsa is an etymology. sent15: the analgesic is a kind of an etymology if the phalsa alibis Tachinidae. sent16: if the analgesic is not invertible the fact that it does offer loofah and does strain stylization does not hold. sent17: the analgesic is not invertible. sent18: that the divide is a maxi and it does offer loofah is not true if the weatherman does offer loofah. sent19: the divide is invertible if the fact that it is not a maxi and it does offer loofah is not right. sent20: if something offers loofah then it does clamp. sent21: the squab is a kind of an amortization. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent21 -> int1: the phalsa clamps.; sent1 -> int2: if the phalsa is a clamp then it does alibi Tachinidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the phalsa does alibi Tachinidae.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the analgesic is an etymology.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the analgesic does not strain weatherman.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the analgesic does not strain weatherman but it is an etymology.; __UNKNOWN__