the paddock is not a peeve.
sent1: the fractionation does hoodoo fussiness. sent2: the paddock is a kind of a peeve if the fractionation does not crouch. sent3: the fractionation is not a crouch if that it does not hoodoo fussiness or it is ultramicroscopic or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that either the fractionation does not hoodoo fussiness or it is ultramicroscopic or both is not correct. sent5: if that something either is not a crouch or is denominational or both does not hold it does not hoodoo ribose. sent6: the fossil is not a crouch.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fractionation is not a crouch.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that either the stringybark does not crouch or it is denominational or both is incorrect it does not hoodoo ribose.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the paddock is not a peeve. ; $context$ = sent1: the fractionation does hoodoo fussiness. sent2: the paddock is a kind of a peeve if the fractionation does not crouch. sent3: the fractionation is not a crouch if that it does not hoodoo fussiness or it is ultramicroscopic or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that either the fractionation does not hoodoo fussiness or it is ultramicroscopic or both is not correct. sent5: if that something either is not a crouch or is denominational or both does not hold it does not hoodoo ribose. sent6: the fossil is not a crouch. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fractionation is not a crouch.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__