the biteplate is acrocentric if the mite is a Sagittarius.
sent1: if the biteplate is a kind of a quincentennial it does piddle basketry. sent2: the photography is a quincentennial. sent3: if something that is not a Bonney does hum Mimus then it does not mystify illness. sent4: the biteplate is not a Hugo if it does not outstare weathercock and does piddle basketry. sent5: something does piddle basketry if it is quincentennial. sent6: if something that does not outstare weathercock is a isohel then it is a Sagittarius. sent7: the mite does not piddle basketry if it is not acrocentric but a Sagittarius. sent8: the ghostwriter is a Sagittarius. sent9: that something is a isohel that outstares weathercock is false if the fact that it is not a Sagittarius is not wrong. sent10: that the biteplate is a Hugo and it is a kind of a quincentennial is not right. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a isohel and it does outstare weathercock does not hold the biteplate is immobile. sent12: if the mite does not outstare weathercock and is a isohel it is a Sagittarius. sent13: something is not a Sagittarius if that it is not a quincentennial and/or it is a Hugo is wrong. sent14: if something does piddle basketry then it is acrocentric. sent15: the biteplate outstares weathercock if the mite is a Hugo. sent16: if the fact that something is a Hugo that is not a kind of a quincentennial does not hold then it does piddle basketry. sent17: the mite does outstare weathercock if it is acrocentric. sent18: the biteplate is not a isohel. sent19: the mite does not outstare weathercock. sent20: the crossbill is a isohel. sent21: The weathercock does not outstare mite. sent22: if the mite is not a kind of a isohel that the biteplate is a Hugo but it is not quincentennial is not correct. sent23: the mite is a Hooke. sent24: something is not a Sagittarius if that it does not outstare weathercock and is a kind of a isohel is correct. sent25: if that something outstares Picasso and is non-Sufi is incorrect the fact that it is a skateboard is not wrong. sent26: that if the mite is not a isohel that that the biteplate is a Hugo and it is quincentennial is not wrong is wrong hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mite is a isohel.; sent19 & assump2 -> int1: the mite does not outstare weathercock but it is a isohel.; sent24 -> int2: the mite is not a Sagittarius if it does not outstare weathercock and it is a kind of a isohel.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mite is not a Sagittarius.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mite is a kind of a Sagittarius.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the mite is not a isohel.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: that the biteplate is a Hugo but it is not a quincentennial is not correct.; sent16 -> int7: the biteplate does piddle basketry if that it is a Hugo and it is not a kind of a quincentennial is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the biteplate piddles basketry.; sent14 -> int9: the biteplate is acrocentric if it does piddle basketry.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the biteplate is acrocentric.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the cartoonist is not acrocentric.
sent9 -> int11: the fact that the biteplate is a isohel and it does outstare weathercock does not hold if it is not a Sagittarius.; sent13 -> int12: the biteplate is not a Sagittarius if that it is non-quincentennial or it is a Hugo or both is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the biteplate is acrocentric if the mite is a Sagittarius. ; $context$ = sent1: if the biteplate is a kind of a quincentennial it does piddle basketry. sent2: the photography is a quincentennial. sent3: if something that is not a Bonney does hum Mimus then it does not mystify illness. sent4: the biteplate is not a Hugo if it does not outstare weathercock and does piddle basketry. sent5: something does piddle basketry if it is quincentennial. sent6: if something that does not outstare weathercock is a isohel then it is a Sagittarius. sent7: the mite does not piddle basketry if it is not acrocentric but a Sagittarius. sent8: the ghostwriter is a Sagittarius. sent9: that something is a isohel that outstares weathercock is false if the fact that it is not a Sagittarius is not wrong. sent10: that the biteplate is a Hugo and it is a kind of a quincentennial is not right. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a isohel and it does outstare weathercock does not hold the biteplate is immobile. sent12: if the mite does not outstare weathercock and is a isohel it is a Sagittarius. sent13: something is not a Sagittarius if that it is not a quincentennial and/or it is a Hugo is wrong. sent14: if something does piddle basketry then it is acrocentric. sent15: the biteplate outstares weathercock if the mite is a Hugo. sent16: if the fact that something is a Hugo that is not a kind of a quincentennial does not hold then it does piddle basketry. sent17: the mite does outstare weathercock if it is acrocentric. sent18: the biteplate is not a isohel. sent19: the mite does not outstare weathercock. sent20: the crossbill is a isohel. sent21: The weathercock does not outstare mite. sent22: if the mite is not a kind of a isohel that the biteplate is a Hugo but it is not quincentennial is not correct. sent23: the mite is a Hooke. sent24: something is not a Sagittarius if that it does not outstare weathercock and is a kind of a isohel is correct. sent25: if that something outstares Picasso and is non-Sufi is incorrect the fact that it is a skateboard is not wrong. sent26: that if the mite is not a isohel that that the biteplate is a Hugo and it is quincentennial is not wrong is wrong hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mite is a isohel.; sent19 & assump2 -> int1: the mite does not outstare weathercock but it is a isohel.; sent24 -> int2: the mite is not a Sagittarius if it does not outstare weathercock and it is a kind of a isohel.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mite is not a Sagittarius.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mite is a kind of a Sagittarius.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the mite is not a isohel.; int5 & sent22 -> int6: that the biteplate is a Hugo but it is not a quincentennial is not correct.; sent16 -> int7: the biteplate does piddle basketry if that it is a Hugo and it is not a kind of a quincentennial is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the biteplate piddles basketry.; sent14 -> int9: the biteplate is acrocentric if it does piddle basketry.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the biteplate is acrocentric.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__