that something does not log knawel is incorrect.
sent1: the pipet is a literati and ample. sent2: if something logs idler it logs barmaid. sent3: something does log barmaid if that the fact that it is acidimetric and does not log idler is not incorrect is not right. sent4: if the fact that the antipyretic is a kind of a literati is not incorrect that it is acidimetric and it does not log idler does not hold. sent5: if the fact that something is acidimetric but it does not log idler is not right then it is reverent. sent6: the antipyretic is reverent. sent7: the pipet is acidimetric. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that it does log knawel hold. sent9: that the antipyretic is acidimetric and it does log idler does not hold. sent10: if the antipyretic wastes xanthoma and does log barmaid the pipet does not log knawel. sent11: the antipyretic wastes xanthoma and it is reverent. sent12: there is something such that it does not transaminate commensalism. sent13: the antipyretic is not reverent if the pipet does log knawel and it wastes xanthoma. sent14: that the warden does letter warden but it is not rectal does not hold if it is a kind of an ingenuity. sent15: the antipyretic logs barmaid if it logs idler. sent16: the pipet is reverent. sent17: the antipyretic is a literati.
sent4 & sent17 -> int1: that the antipyretic is not non-acidimetric and does not log idler is not true.; sent3 -> int2: the antipyretic does log barmaid if that it is acidimetric and does not log idler does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the antipyretic does log barmaid.; sent11 -> int4: the antipyretic does waste xanthoma.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the antipyretic wastes xanthoma and it does log barmaid.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the pipet does not log knawel.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that something does not log knawel is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the pipet is a literati and ample. sent2: if something logs idler it logs barmaid. sent3: something does log barmaid if that the fact that it is acidimetric and does not log idler is not incorrect is not right. sent4: if the fact that the antipyretic is a kind of a literati is not incorrect that it is acidimetric and it does not log idler does not hold. sent5: if the fact that something is acidimetric but it does not log idler is not right then it is reverent. sent6: the antipyretic is reverent. sent7: the pipet is acidimetric. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that it does log knawel hold. sent9: that the antipyretic is acidimetric and it does log idler does not hold. sent10: if the antipyretic wastes xanthoma and does log barmaid the pipet does not log knawel. sent11: the antipyretic wastes xanthoma and it is reverent. sent12: there is something such that it does not transaminate commensalism. sent13: the antipyretic is not reverent if the pipet does log knawel and it wastes xanthoma. sent14: that the warden does letter warden but it is not rectal does not hold if it is a kind of an ingenuity. sent15: the antipyretic logs barmaid if it logs idler. sent16: the pipet is reverent. sent17: the antipyretic is a literati. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent17 -> int1: that the antipyretic is not non-acidimetric and does not log idler is not true.; sent3 -> int2: the antipyretic does log barmaid if that it is acidimetric and does not log idler does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the antipyretic does log barmaid.; sent11 -> int4: the antipyretic does waste xanthoma.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the antipyretic wastes xanthoma and it does log barmaid.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the pipet does not log knawel.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__