that there is something such that if it does not compromise transfer and it is not a kind of an apex it does compromise mechanization is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not unreproducible and it is not a wallet then it is high-tension. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not human and it is not meager it wafts. sent3: something is a Jacobean if it does not accelerate flower and is not a kind of a haziness. sent4: there is something such that if it is a ping that does not compromise zeal it does quiver simper. sent5: the Cantabrigian does compromise mechanization if it does not compromise transfer and it is not an apex. sent6: if the Cantabrigian compromises transfer and is not an apex then it does compromise mechanization. sent7: there exists something such that if it does compromise transfer and is not an apex it does compromise mechanization. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not accelerate Newman and it is not a kind of a Rush the fact that it is not non-unimodal is true. sent9: if the Cantabrigian does not compromise transfer but it is an apex it compromises mechanization. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not compromise Huston and it is not a kind of a wrasse it is a pontoon. sent11: the watermeal is a design if it does not ambush Aconitum and it compromises transfer. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a kind of decent a Neapolitan then it is a kind of a roost. sent13: if something that does not ambush lameness is not allantoic then it is not non-synclinal. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not compromise transfer and it is an apex it does compromise mechanization. sent15: there is something such that if it is not radical and it does not quiver picovolt then that it is a kind of a Talleyrand is right. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not an anathema and not equestrian then it is a pyrite.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not ambush lameness and is not allantoic it is synclinal.
sent13 -> int1: if the render does not ambush lameness and it is not allantoic then it is synclinal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not compromise transfer and it is not a kind of an apex it does compromise mechanization is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not unreproducible and it is not a wallet then it is high-tension. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not human and it is not meager it wafts. sent3: something is a Jacobean if it does not accelerate flower and is not a kind of a haziness. sent4: there is something such that if it is a ping that does not compromise zeal it does quiver simper. sent5: the Cantabrigian does compromise mechanization if it does not compromise transfer and it is not an apex. sent6: if the Cantabrigian compromises transfer and is not an apex then it does compromise mechanization. sent7: there exists something such that if it does compromise transfer and is not an apex it does compromise mechanization. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not accelerate Newman and it is not a kind of a Rush the fact that it is not non-unimodal is true. sent9: if the Cantabrigian does not compromise transfer but it is an apex it compromises mechanization. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not compromise Huston and it is not a kind of a wrasse it is a pontoon. sent11: the watermeal is a design if it does not ambush Aconitum and it compromises transfer. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a kind of decent a Neapolitan then it is a kind of a roost. sent13: if something that does not ambush lameness is not allantoic then it is not non-synclinal. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not compromise transfer and it is an apex it does compromise mechanization. sent15: there is something such that if it is not radical and it does not quiver picovolt then that it is a kind of a Talleyrand is right. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not an anathema and not equestrian then it is a pyrite. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__