that not the phagocyticness but the clanking legation happens is not right.
sent1: the fact that the biotypicness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the Moldovanness does not occur if the convoying Wilton does not occur and the washableness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the convoying Wilton occurs but the send-off does not occur is false if the washableness happens. sent4: both the non-phagocyticness and the auto-da-fe occurs. sent5: the flitting does not occur if the fact that the convoying Wilton does not occur and the washableness does not occur is not right. sent6: that the phagocyticness does not occur but the clanking legation occurs is not true if the reprieving does not occur. sent7: both the altruisticness and the reentry happens if the fact that the clanking Z does not occur is right. sent8: the rotogravure does not occur if that not the fragmenting sovereignty but the occasioning occurs is not correct. sent9: the noxiousness does not occur if the fact that both the orthopedicsness and the noxiousness happens is wrong. sent10: if the whiteout does not occur then that the Moldovanness occurs and the flit occurs is not correct. sent11: if the flit does not occur then the fact that the clanking legation happens is right. sent12: either the whiteouting does not occur or the default does not occur or both. sent13: the fact that the repairing happens is true if the extension happens. sent14: if the biotypicness does not occur that the reprieving occurs and the Moldovanness does not occur does not hold. sent15: that both the auto-da-fe and the biotypicness occurs is not right if the rotogravure does not occur. sent16: that the reprieving does not occur is prevented by either that the whiteouting does not occur or that the defaulting does not occur or both. sent17: if that the repair happens is not wrong the fact that not the fragmenting sovereignty but the occasioning occurs is wrong. sent18: the fact that the extension happens is not wrong if the altruisticness happens. sent19: if the radioness does not occur then the fact that both the orthopedicsness and the noxiousness occurs does not hold. sent20: that the noxiousness does not occur prevents that the clanking Z happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the convoying Wilton does not occur and the washableness does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Moldovanness does not occur.; sent16 & sent12 -> int2: the reprieve occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the reprieve and the non-Moldovanness happens.; sent14 & sent1 -> int4: that both the reprieve and the non-Moldovanness occurs is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the convoying Wilton does not occur and the washableness does not occur is false.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the flitting does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the clanking legation happens.; sent4 -> int9: the fact that the phagocyticness does not occur is right.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the non-phagocyticness and the clanking legation occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = that not the phagocyticness but the clanking legation happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the biotypicness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the Moldovanness does not occur if the convoying Wilton does not occur and the washableness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the convoying Wilton occurs but the send-off does not occur is false if the washableness happens. sent4: both the non-phagocyticness and the auto-da-fe occurs. sent5: the flitting does not occur if the fact that the convoying Wilton does not occur and the washableness does not occur is not right. sent6: that the phagocyticness does not occur but the clanking legation occurs is not true if the reprieving does not occur. sent7: both the altruisticness and the reentry happens if the fact that the clanking Z does not occur is right. sent8: the rotogravure does not occur if that not the fragmenting sovereignty but the occasioning occurs is not correct. sent9: the noxiousness does not occur if the fact that both the orthopedicsness and the noxiousness happens is wrong. sent10: if the whiteout does not occur then that the Moldovanness occurs and the flit occurs is not correct. sent11: if the flit does not occur then the fact that the clanking legation happens is right. sent12: either the whiteouting does not occur or the default does not occur or both. sent13: the fact that the repairing happens is true if the extension happens. sent14: if the biotypicness does not occur that the reprieving occurs and the Moldovanness does not occur does not hold. sent15: that both the auto-da-fe and the biotypicness occurs is not right if the rotogravure does not occur. sent16: that the reprieving does not occur is prevented by either that the whiteouting does not occur or that the defaulting does not occur or both. sent17: if that the repair happens is not wrong the fact that not the fragmenting sovereignty but the occasioning occurs is wrong. sent18: the fact that the extension happens is not wrong if the altruisticness happens. sent19: if the radioness does not occur then the fact that both the orthopedicsness and the noxiousness occurs does not hold. sent20: that the noxiousness does not occur prevents that the clanking Z happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the convoying Wilton does not occur and the washableness does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Moldovanness does not occur.; sent16 & sent12 -> int2: the reprieve occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the reprieve and the non-Moldovanness happens.; sent14 & sent1 -> int4: that both the reprieve and the non-Moldovanness occurs is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the convoying Wilton does not occur and the washableness does not occur is false.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the flitting does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the clanking legation happens.; sent4 -> int9: the fact that the phagocyticness does not occur is right.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__