the fact that the fact that the frump nickels mermaid and it is unsavory is not false is not correct.
sent1: the flavonoid does nickel mermaid. sent2: if that something does not nickel mermaid is not wrong it is not non-difficult. sent3: there are earless things. sent4: if there is something such that that it is a malope and orthopedics is not right then the Argentinian is not difficult. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a malope and orthopedics does not hold. sent6: if something does freckle burden then that it is not nominalistic is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that the frump is not difficult and it is not a hypocellularity is not true. sent8: the Argentinian does not mismanage underclass if the fact that it does not nickel mermaid and is not difficult is not correct. sent9: the fog nickels mermaid. sent10: something does not mismanage underclass if that it is non-exculpatory thing that is not adducent does not hold. sent11: that the frump freckles exordium and does not mismanage underclass is not correct. sent12: something nickels mermaid and is unsavory if it does not mismanage underclass. sent13: the Argentinian is difficult if it does freckle exordium. sent14: there exists something such that it does freckle exordium. sent15: there exists something such that it does hem and it is cosmologic. sent16: something is difficult if the fact that it is adducent hold. sent17: there is something such that that it is anhydrous and it is forceful is not right. sent18: if something is a peripeteia it does not freckle patency. sent19: if the fact that the frump is difficult is correct it nickels mermaid. sent20: if there is something such that it does not freckle exordium that the frump is non-exculpatory thing that is not adducent is incorrect. sent21: the mistral is not unsavory. sent22: if the fact that the fact that the toff is both not a twenties and not a sway is not correct is not wrong it does not nickel mermaid. sent23: the Argentinian does freckle exordium but it is not exculpatory if there exists something such that it is difficult.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Argentinian freckles exordium.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Argentinian is difficult.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the Argentinian is not difficult.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Argentinian does not freckle exordium.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it does not freckle exordium.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the fact that the frump is not exculpatory and is not adducent is not right.; sent10 -> int7: the frump does not mismanage underclass if the fact that it is not exculpatory and it is not adducent is false.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the frump does not mismanage underclass.; sent12 -> int9: the frump does nickel mermaid and it is unsavory if it does not mismanage underclass.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the Argentinian is not exculpatory.
sent16 -> int10: the frump is difficult if it is adducent.; sent1 -> int11: there exists something such that it nickels mermaid.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the frump nickels mermaid and it is unsavory is not false is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the flavonoid does nickel mermaid. sent2: if that something does not nickel mermaid is not wrong it is not non-difficult. sent3: there are earless things. sent4: if there is something such that that it is a malope and orthopedics is not right then the Argentinian is not difficult. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a malope and orthopedics does not hold. sent6: if something does freckle burden then that it is not nominalistic is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that the frump is not difficult and it is not a hypocellularity is not true. sent8: the Argentinian does not mismanage underclass if the fact that it does not nickel mermaid and is not difficult is not correct. sent9: the fog nickels mermaid. sent10: something does not mismanage underclass if that it is non-exculpatory thing that is not adducent does not hold. sent11: that the frump freckles exordium and does not mismanage underclass is not correct. sent12: something nickels mermaid and is unsavory if it does not mismanage underclass. sent13: the Argentinian is difficult if it does freckle exordium. sent14: there exists something such that it does freckle exordium. sent15: there exists something such that it does hem and it is cosmologic. sent16: something is difficult if the fact that it is adducent hold. sent17: there is something such that that it is anhydrous and it is forceful is not right. sent18: if something is a peripeteia it does not freckle patency. sent19: if the fact that the frump is difficult is correct it nickels mermaid. sent20: if there is something such that it does not freckle exordium that the frump is non-exculpatory thing that is not adducent is incorrect. sent21: the mistral is not unsavory. sent22: if the fact that the fact that the toff is both not a twenties and not a sway is not correct is not wrong it does not nickel mermaid. sent23: the Argentinian does freckle exordium but it is not exculpatory if there exists something such that it is difficult. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Argentinian freckles exordium.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Argentinian is difficult.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the Argentinian is not difficult.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Argentinian does not freckle exordium.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it does not freckle exordium.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the fact that the frump is not exculpatory and is not adducent is not right.; sent10 -> int7: the frump does not mismanage underclass if the fact that it is not exculpatory and it is not adducent is false.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the frump does not mismanage underclass.; sent12 -> int9: the frump does nickel mermaid and it is unsavory if it does not mismanage underclass.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__