the soleus acquaints suspense.
sent1: the DSL does slight Anglesey. sent2: if the soleus is a snow-in-summer and it is a spiegeleisen it does slight Anglesey. sent3: the DSL slights Anglesey and is not a kind of a spiegeleisen. sent4: the DSL is subclavian if it does slight Anglesey and is not a kind of a spiegeleisen. sent5: the bootjack patrols DSL and it is a Bonhoeffer. sent6: the soleus is an appeal that is not a Constantinople. sent7: the DSL is intrapulmonary if the bootjack is diffused. sent8: the bootjack is a snow-in-summer and unproductive. sent9: the bootjack is intrapulmonary. sent10: if a subclavian thing is intrapulmonary then the soleus is a kind of a snow-in-summer. sent11: something is not a kind of a spiegeleisen. sent12: if that the sausage is not a kind of a snow-in-summer and does not slight Anglesey hold that it is subclavian hold. sent13: if something that diffuses is a snow-in-summer the bootjack acquaints suspense. sent14: if something is subclavian it does patrol DSL. sent15: there is something such that it does slight Anglesey. sent16: that the Alyssum is intrapulmonary is not false. sent17: the fact that the soleus does not diffuse and does acquaint suspense is not correct if the bootjack does patrol DSL. sent18: if the bootjack is intrapulmonary and does not patrol DSL it is a spiegeleisen. sent19: the bootjack patrols DSL and is diffused. sent20: the bootjack does acquaint suspense. sent21: that the DSL does patrol DSL is not wrong. sent22: something does acquaint suspense if it is a kind of a snow-in-summer. sent23: if something is a kind of a rounded it does code. sent24: the bootjack does patrol DSL if the fact that the DSL does not patrol DSL and is intrapulmonary is not correct.
sent19 -> int1: the bootjack does diffuse.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the DSL is intrapulmonary.; sent4 & sent3 -> int3: the DSL is subclavian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the DSL is subclavian and it is intrapulmonary.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is both not non-subclavian and not non-intrapulmonary.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the soleus is a kind of a snow-in-summer.; sent22 -> int7: the soleus does acquaint suspense if the fact that it is a snow-in-summer is true.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the soleus does not acquaint suspense is right.
sent14 -> int8: if the sausage is subclavian then it patrols DSL.;
$hypothesis$ = the soleus acquaints suspense. ; $context$ = sent1: the DSL does slight Anglesey. sent2: if the soleus is a snow-in-summer and it is a spiegeleisen it does slight Anglesey. sent3: the DSL slights Anglesey and is not a kind of a spiegeleisen. sent4: the DSL is subclavian if it does slight Anglesey and is not a kind of a spiegeleisen. sent5: the bootjack patrols DSL and it is a Bonhoeffer. sent6: the soleus is an appeal that is not a Constantinople. sent7: the DSL is intrapulmonary if the bootjack is diffused. sent8: the bootjack is a snow-in-summer and unproductive. sent9: the bootjack is intrapulmonary. sent10: if a subclavian thing is intrapulmonary then the soleus is a kind of a snow-in-summer. sent11: something is not a kind of a spiegeleisen. sent12: if that the sausage is not a kind of a snow-in-summer and does not slight Anglesey hold that it is subclavian hold. sent13: if something that diffuses is a snow-in-summer the bootjack acquaints suspense. sent14: if something is subclavian it does patrol DSL. sent15: there is something such that it does slight Anglesey. sent16: that the Alyssum is intrapulmonary is not false. sent17: the fact that the soleus does not diffuse and does acquaint suspense is not correct if the bootjack does patrol DSL. sent18: if the bootjack is intrapulmonary and does not patrol DSL it is a spiegeleisen. sent19: the bootjack patrols DSL and is diffused. sent20: the bootjack does acquaint suspense. sent21: that the DSL does patrol DSL is not wrong. sent22: something does acquaint suspense if it is a kind of a snow-in-summer. sent23: if something is a kind of a rounded it does code. sent24: the bootjack does patrol DSL if the fact that the DSL does not patrol DSL and is intrapulmonary is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the bootjack does diffuse.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the DSL is intrapulmonary.; sent4 & sent3 -> int3: the DSL is subclavian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the DSL is subclavian and it is intrapulmonary.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is both not non-subclavian and not non-intrapulmonary.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the soleus is a kind of a snow-in-summer.; sent22 -> int7: the soleus does acquaint suspense if the fact that it is a snow-in-summer is true.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__