the mangle does slash.
sent1: if the ostiole is not a Liberian it does not punch. sent2: the ostiole is not beakless. sent3: that the technocrat splays music but it is not a Linz is not right. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it does splay music and is not a Linz is wrong the jalousie is not a liana. sent5: if the ostiole is vesicular and beakless it is not a defoliation. sent6: if the mangle is not a punch it is not a slashed. sent7: either the mangle is a liana or it is not a Thorpe or both. sent8: that that the ostiole is vesicular and it is beakless is not false is not right. sent9: if the ostiole is a Liberian the Dravidian is beakless. sent10: the mangle is a liana and/or is not a Thorpe if the ostiole is not a Liberian. sent11: the mangle is not azotic and/or it is beaked. sent12: the ostiole is not a defoliation if it is vesicular and it is not beakless. sent13: the ostiole is not Liberian if the fact that it is not beakless is not true. sent14: if the fact that the pelisse does punch is true then the jalousie is a Thorpe. sent15: the ostiole is a kind of a defoliation. sent16: if something is not a punch and is a liana then it is not a Thorpe. sent17: if the mangle is not a liana and/or it is not a kind of a Thorpe then the fact that it is not a punch is not wrong. sent18: the ostiole is not a Thorpe. sent19: the mangle is not a liana and/or it is not a Thorpe if the ostiole is not a kind of a Liberian. sent20: the vinyl is a kind of a defoliation and is not a coarseness. sent21: if the mangle is not a liana then it is not a kind of a punch. sent22: the ostiole is not a Liberian if that it is vesicular and is not beakless is wrong. sent23: the jalousie is a kind of a defoliation if it is not a kind of a liana. sent24: if that the ostiole is non-Liberian does not hold the mangle slashes.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ostiole is vesicular and is not beakless.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the ostiole is not a kind of a defoliation.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the ostiole is vesicular but it is not beakless is not correct.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the ostiole is non-Liberian.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the mangle is not a liana and/or it is not a Thorpe.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the mangle does not punch.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the Dravidian is beakless is not incorrect.
sent16 -> int7: if the fact that the mangle is not a punch and is a liana is true then it is not a Thorpe.;
$hypothesis$ = the mangle does slash. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ostiole is not a Liberian it does not punch. sent2: the ostiole is not beakless. sent3: that the technocrat splays music but it is not a Linz is not right. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it does splay music and is not a Linz is wrong the jalousie is not a liana. sent5: if the ostiole is vesicular and beakless it is not a defoliation. sent6: if the mangle is not a punch it is not a slashed. sent7: either the mangle is a liana or it is not a Thorpe or both. sent8: that that the ostiole is vesicular and it is beakless is not false is not right. sent9: if the ostiole is a Liberian the Dravidian is beakless. sent10: the mangle is a liana and/or is not a Thorpe if the ostiole is not a Liberian. sent11: the mangle is not azotic and/or it is beaked. sent12: the ostiole is not a defoliation if it is vesicular and it is not beakless. sent13: the ostiole is not Liberian if the fact that it is not beakless is not true. sent14: if the fact that the pelisse does punch is true then the jalousie is a Thorpe. sent15: the ostiole is a kind of a defoliation. sent16: if something is not a punch and is a liana then it is not a Thorpe. sent17: if the mangle is not a liana and/or it is not a kind of a Thorpe then the fact that it is not a punch is not wrong. sent18: the ostiole is not a Thorpe. sent19: the mangle is not a liana and/or it is not a Thorpe if the ostiole is not a kind of a Liberian. sent20: the vinyl is a kind of a defoliation and is not a coarseness. sent21: if the mangle is not a liana then it is not a kind of a punch. sent22: the ostiole is not a Liberian if that it is vesicular and is not beakless is wrong. sent23: the jalousie is a kind of a defoliation if it is not a kind of a liana. sent24: if that the ostiole is non-Liberian does not hold the mangle slashes. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ostiole is vesicular and is not beakless.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the ostiole is not a kind of a defoliation.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the ostiole is vesicular but it is not beakless is not correct.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the ostiole is non-Liberian.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the mangle is not a liana and/or it is not a Thorpe.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the mangle does not punch.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__