the platelet does not log tinsmith and is not a kind of a Canidae.
sent1: if something is saxicolous that it does not log tinsmith and is not a Canidae does not hold. sent2: if that the niche is not a Selkirk and it is not thoughtful is not right the diamagnet is not a kind of a chiasmus. sent3: the fact that the bronchodilator is a ex-wife and it logs tinsmith is not right if that there is something such that it is not a Canidae hold. sent4: the bronchodilator is a myrmidon if it does skitter. sent5: the platelet is a kind of a variation if there exists something such that it is a commonweal. sent6: the fact that the bronchodilator is oceanic is correct. sent7: the breakax does not log tinsmith and is not a Canidae if there is something such that it is a ex-wife. sent8: the platelet does not log tinsmith and is not a Canidae if there is something such that it is a kind of a ex-wife. sent9: that something is thoughtful and it is a kind of a chiasmus is not correct if it is not a Selkirk. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a ex-wife then that the breakax is not satisfactory and is not saxicolous is not right. sent11: that the fact that something is not a Selkirk and it is not thoughtful does not hold if it is a kind of a myrmidon is not false. sent12: the fact that the bronchodilator is a Sawan and/or it skitters hold. sent13: the breakax is a ex-wife if something is saxicolous. sent14: the platelet is not a Canidae if there exists something such that it is a kind of a ex-wife. sent15: if the diamagnet is not a chiasmus then it is not a Canidae. sent16: the platelet is satisfactory if that the breakax is not satisfactory and is not saxicolous does not hold. sent17: there is something such that it is saxicolous. sent18: there exists something such that it is a Canidae. sent19: something that is not a kind of a chiasmus is saxicolous and is a ex-wife. sent20: the bronchodilator is a myrmidon if it is a Sawan. sent21: the breakax is not a Selkirk if something is a kind of a myrmidon and it is oceanic. sent22: the platelet is not a Canidae.
sent17 & sent13 -> int1: the breakax is a ex-wife.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a ex-wife.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the platelet is not unsatisfactory.
sent11 -> int3: if the niche is a myrmidon that it is not a Selkirk and it is not thoughtful does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the platelet does not log tinsmith and is not a kind of a Canidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is saxicolous that it does not log tinsmith and is not a Canidae does not hold. sent2: if that the niche is not a Selkirk and it is not thoughtful is not right the diamagnet is not a kind of a chiasmus. sent3: the fact that the bronchodilator is a ex-wife and it logs tinsmith is not right if that there is something such that it is not a Canidae hold. sent4: the bronchodilator is a myrmidon if it does skitter. sent5: the platelet is a kind of a variation if there exists something such that it is a commonweal. sent6: the fact that the bronchodilator is oceanic is correct. sent7: the breakax does not log tinsmith and is not a Canidae if there is something such that it is a ex-wife. sent8: the platelet does not log tinsmith and is not a Canidae if there is something such that it is a kind of a ex-wife. sent9: that something is thoughtful and it is a kind of a chiasmus is not correct if it is not a Selkirk. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a ex-wife then that the breakax is not satisfactory and is not saxicolous is not right. sent11: that the fact that something is not a Selkirk and it is not thoughtful does not hold if it is a kind of a myrmidon is not false. sent12: the fact that the bronchodilator is a Sawan and/or it skitters hold. sent13: the breakax is a ex-wife if something is saxicolous. sent14: the platelet is not a Canidae if there exists something such that it is a kind of a ex-wife. sent15: if the diamagnet is not a chiasmus then it is not a Canidae. sent16: the platelet is satisfactory if that the breakax is not satisfactory and is not saxicolous does not hold. sent17: there is something such that it is saxicolous. sent18: there exists something such that it is a Canidae. sent19: something that is not a kind of a chiasmus is saxicolous and is a ex-wife. sent20: the bronchodilator is a myrmidon if it is a Sawan. sent21: the breakax is not a Selkirk if something is a kind of a myrmidon and it is oceanic. sent22: the platelet is not a Canidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent13 -> int1: the breakax is a ex-wife.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a ex-wife.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__