there exists something such that if it is not a perforation then that it is censorial and does sparkle bicarbonate is not true.
sent1: if something does not whirl postern the fact that it is a kind of a Chytridiaceae that is a Protium is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a perforation then it is censorial and it sparkles bicarbonate. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a Jericho that it is a tread and is ascomycetous is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a perforation then that it is a kind of censorial thing that sparkles bicarbonate is not right. sent5: that the raglan is censorial and does sparkle bicarbonate is not true if the fact that it is not a kind of a perforation is not incorrect. sent6: if the raglan is a kind of a perforation then that it is censorial and sparkles bicarbonate is false. sent7: if the raglan is not a perforation it is censorial and it sparkles bicarbonate.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it does not whirl postern is right then the fact that it is both a Chytridiaceae and a Protium is not right.
sent1 -> int1: if that the postern does not whirl postern is true that it is a kind of a Chytridiaceae and is a Protium is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a perforation then that it is censorial and does sparkle bicarbonate is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not whirl postern the fact that it is a kind of a Chytridiaceae that is a Protium is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a perforation then it is censorial and it sparkles bicarbonate. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a Jericho that it is a tread and is ascomycetous is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a perforation then that it is a kind of censorial thing that sparkles bicarbonate is not right. sent5: that the raglan is censorial and does sparkle bicarbonate is not true if the fact that it is not a kind of a perforation is not incorrect. sent6: if the raglan is a kind of a perforation then that it is censorial and sparkles bicarbonate is false. sent7: if the raglan is not a perforation it is censorial and it sparkles bicarbonate. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__