the skier does not book patience.
sent1: if the fact that something is not a kind of a pointedness and it does not slog embankment is not right then it strips skier. sent2: the fact that the anionic does not strip Psalm and it is not a kind of a Yama is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the anionic is not a function hold. sent4: if the fact that something does not strip Psalm and is not Lilliputian is not correct it is aphrodisiac. sent5: the Raffia strips Psalm if the fact that it is not a Yama and is not a kind of a Lilliputian is not true. sent6: that the skier does not underlie but it is field-crop does not hold if the anionic is a kind of an aphrodisiac. sent7: the fact that the anionic does book patience and it is field-crop is not right if the skier is an aphrodisiac. sent8: if that something is not a Ogden but it is an alumina is wrong it does not strip Lofoten. sent9: the anionic does not underlie if the fact that it does not strip Psalm and it is a kind of an aphrodisiac is not right. sent10: that something is a Ogden hold if it does slog occultist. sent11: the fact that the anionic does not consist is not wrong. sent12: there is something such that it is a cotoneaster. sent13: the skier does not underlie if it is a Lilliputian. sent14: the Raffia is not a Yama. sent15: that the anionic does not strip Psalm and it is not a Lilliputian is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a Yama. sent16: that the Raffia is not aphrodisiac and does not strip Psalm does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Yama. sent17: the fact that the lavaliere does not rid neoromanticism and is not a Yama does not hold. sent18: there is something such that it does not rid expectedness. sent19: the Raffia does slog embankment if it strips Psalm.
sent14 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a Yama.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the anionic does not strip Psalm and it is not a Lilliputian is wrong.; sent4 -> int3: if that the anionic does not strip Psalm and it is not a kind of a Lilliputian is not right it is an aphrodisiac.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the anionic is aphrodisiac is true.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the skier does not underlie and is field-crop does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the skier does not book patience. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not a kind of a pointedness and it does not slog embankment is not right then it strips skier. sent2: the fact that the anionic does not strip Psalm and it is not a kind of a Yama is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the anionic is not a function hold. sent4: if the fact that something does not strip Psalm and is not Lilliputian is not correct it is aphrodisiac. sent5: the Raffia strips Psalm if the fact that it is not a Yama and is not a kind of a Lilliputian is not true. sent6: that the skier does not underlie but it is field-crop does not hold if the anionic is a kind of an aphrodisiac. sent7: the fact that the anionic does book patience and it is field-crop is not right if the skier is an aphrodisiac. sent8: if that something is not a Ogden but it is an alumina is wrong it does not strip Lofoten. sent9: the anionic does not underlie if the fact that it does not strip Psalm and it is a kind of an aphrodisiac is not right. sent10: that something is a Ogden hold if it does slog occultist. sent11: the fact that the anionic does not consist is not wrong. sent12: there is something such that it is a cotoneaster. sent13: the skier does not underlie if it is a Lilliputian. sent14: the Raffia is not a Yama. sent15: that the anionic does not strip Psalm and it is not a Lilliputian is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a Yama. sent16: that the Raffia is not aphrodisiac and does not strip Psalm does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Yama. sent17: the fact that the lavaliere does not rid neoromanticism and is not a Yama does not hold. sent18: there is something such that it does not rid expectedness. sent19: the Raffia does slog embankment if it strips Psalm. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a Yama.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the anionic does not strip Psalm and it is not a Lilliputian is wrong.; sent4 -> int3: if that the anionic does not strip Psalm and it is not a kind of a Lilliputian is not right it is an aphrodisiac.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the anionic is aphrodisiac is true.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the skier does not underlie and is field-crop does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__