the colorimeter is not interdisciplinary.
sent1: the fact that the pleurothallis does sediment eventuality but it is not a lithography is not true. sent2: the fact that the anisette is both not interdisciplinary and integrative does not hold if the moneran is not Cyrillic. sent3: the colorimeter is interdisciplinary if that the anisette is not interdisciplinary but it is integrative is wrong. sent4: if the anisette is integrative then the bullethead is a lithography. sent5: if that the moneran outshouts Commelinidae and outshouts Orcinus does not hold the colorimeter is not interdisciplinary. sent6: that the pleurothallis does not sediment eventuality if the fact that the moneran is unstable and is a lithography is wrong is not false. sent7: the bullethead does sediment eventuality if the pleurothallis is apteral. sent8: the moneran is not unstable if the bullethead is a lithography and it does sediment eventuality. sent9: if the fact that the pleurothallis does sediment eventuality but it is not apteral is incorrect then the bullethead sediment eventuality. sent10: if the anisette is not non-Cyrillic then the bullethead is a kind of a lithography. sent11: the fact that the pleurothallis sediments eventuality and is not apteral does not hold. sent12: the moneran is apteral if the pleurothallis outshouts Orcinus. sent13: if that the moneran does not outshout Commelinidae is not incorrect the colorimeter is not interdisciplinary. sent14: the colorimeter is a kind of an import and it sediments updating. sent15: the anisette does not outshout Commelinidae. sent16: if something is not unstable the fact that it outshouts Commelinidae and does outshout Orcinus is not right. sent17: the fact that the moneran is integrative is not incorrect if the fact that the anisette is integrative and is not unstable does not hold. sent18: if the pleurothallis does sediment eventuality and it is unstable the moneran is not integrative. sent19: if the fact that the colorimeter is Cyrillic and it is interdisciplinary does not hold then the anisette does not sediment eventuality. sent20: something is non-Cyrillic if it is not a lithography. sent21: the fact that the pleurothallis does sediment eventuality and is apteral does not hold. sent22: the pleurothallis is a lithography and/or it is apteral. sent23: there exists nothing that does not outshout Commelinidae and outshouts Orcinus. sent24: that the anisette is both not non-Cyrillic and not non-interdisciplinary is not correct. sent25: the anisette either is integrative or is a kind of a Cyrillic or both. sent26: the anisette does sediment eventuality if the pleurothallis is a Cyrillic. sent27: the glassware sediments eventuality. sent28: the moneran is not a kind of a lithography if the bullethead does sediment eventuality and is not a lithography.
sent25 & sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the bullethead is a lithography.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the bullethead does sediment eventuality.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bullethead is a lithography and it sediments eventuality.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the moneran is not unstable is not wrong.; sent16 -> int5: the fact that the moneran outshouts Commelinidae and it outshouts Orcinus does not hold if it is not unstable.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the moneran does outshout Commelinidae and it outshouts Orcinus is incorrect.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the colorimeter is interdisciplinary.
sent20 -> int7: the fact that the moneran is not a Cyrillic hold if that it is not a lithography hold.; sent23 -> int8: that the pleurothallis does not outshout Commelinidae and outshouts Orcinus is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the colorimeter is not interdisciplinary. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the pleurothallis does sediment eventuality but it is not a lithography is not true. sent2: the fact that the anisette is both not interdisciplinary and integrative does not hold if the moneran is not Cyrillic. sent3: the colorimeter is interdisciplinary if that the anisette is not interdisciplinary but it is integrative is wrong. sent4: if the anisette is integrative then the bullethead is a lithography. sent5: if that the moneran outshouts Commelinidae and outshouts Orcinus does not hold the colorimeter is not interdisciplinary. sent6: that the pleurothallis does not sediment eventuality if the fact that the moneran is unstable and is a lithography is wrong is not false. sent7: the bullethead does sediment eventuality if the pleurothallis is apteral. sent8: the moneran is not unstable if the bullethead is a lithography and it does sediment eventuality. sent9: if the fact that the pleurothallis does sediment eventuality but it is not apteral is incorrect then the bullethead sediment eventuality. sent10: if the anisette is not non-Cyrillic then the bullethead is a kind of a lithography. sent11: the fact that the pleurothallis sediments eventuality and is not apteral does not hold. sent12: the moneran is apteral if the pleurothallis outshouts Orcinus. sent13: if that the moneran does not outshout Commelinidae is not incorrect the colorimeter is not interdisciplinary. sent14: the colorimeter is a kind of an import and it sediments updating. sent15: the anisette does not outshout Commelinidae. sent16: if something is not unstable the fact that it outshouts Commelinidae and does outshout Orcinus is not right. sent17: the fact that the moneran is integrative is not incorrect if the fact that the anisette is integrative and is not unstable does not hold. sent18: if the pleurothallis does sediment eventuality and it is unstable the moneran is not integrative. sent19: if the fact that the colorimeter is Cyrillic and it is interdisciplinary does not hold then the anisette does not sediment eventuality. sent20: something is non-Cyrillic if it is not a lithography. sent21: the fact that the pleurothallis does sediment eventuality and is apteral does not hold. sent22: the pleurothallis is a lithography and/or it is apteral. sent23: there exists nothing that does not outshout Commelinidae and outshouts Orcinus. sent24: that the anisette is both not non-Cyrillic and not non-interdisciplinary is not correct. sent25: the anisette either is integrative or is a kind of a Cyrillic or both. sent26: the anisette does sediment eventuality if the pleurothallis is a Cyrillic. sent27: the glassware sediments eventuality. sent28: the moneran is not a kind of a lithography if the bullethead does sediment eventuality and is not a lithography. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 & sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the bullethead is a lithography.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the bullethead does sediment eventuality.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bullethead is a lithography and it sediments eventuality.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the moneran is not unstable is not wrong.; sent16 -> int5: the fact that the moneran outshouts Commelinidae and it outshouts Orcinus does not hold if it is not unstable.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the moneran does outshout Commelinidae and it outshouts Orcinus is incorrect.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__