there is something such that if it is not contestable it is not unsurmountable and is not a bitternut.
sent1: if the eparchy does not demoralize then it is not Leonardesque and it is not a kind of a bitternut. sent2: the eparchy does not taste and it is not a zizz if it is not a kind of a monument. sent3: there is something such that if it soldiers Vetluga it does not lave and does not negotiate Ohioan. sent4: there is something such that if it is not contestable then it is not a bitternut. sent5: if something does not eliminate then it is not a kind of a ashlar and does not negotiate prescience. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a sapphirine it is non-centralist thing that does not negotiate tarantism. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not contestable then it is not unsurmountable. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not indurate then it does not trisect quickstep. sent9: the eparchy is a kind of unsurmountable thing that is not a bitternut if it is not contestable. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is not contestable is right it is not unsurmountable and is a bitternut. sent11: if the dragoon is a Contras then it does not quiver Tyrannidae and is not contestable. sent12: if the eparchy is not contestable then it is both not unsurmountable and not a bitternut. sent13: the eparchy is not a bitternut if it is not contestable. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a teju then it is both not uncomplimentary and noncausative. sent15: the tribologist is not unsurmountable and is not amphoteric if it is not unseaworthy.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
the flume is not a ashlar and does not negotiate prescience if it does not eliminate.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not contestable it is not unsurmountable and is not a bitternut. ; $context$ = sent1: if the eparchy does not demoralize then it is not Leonardesque and it is not a kind of a bitternut. sent2: the eparchy does not taste and it is not a zizz if it is not a kind of a monument. sent3: there is something such that if it soldiers Vetluga it does not lave and does not negotiate Ohioan. sent4: there is something such that if it is not contestable then it is not a bitternut. sent5: if something does not eliminate then it is not a kind of a ashlar and does not negotiate prescience. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a sapphirine it is non-centralist thing that does not negotiate tarantism. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not contestable then it is not unsurmountable. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not indurate then it does not trisect quickstep. sent9: the eparchy is a kind of unsurmountable thing that is not a bitternut if it is not contestable. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is not contestable is right it is not unsurmountable and is a bitternut. sent11: if the dragoon is a Contras then it does not quiver Tyrannidae and is not contestable. sent12: if the eparchy is not contestable then it is both not unsurmountable and not a bitternut. sent13: the eparchy is not a bitternut if it is not contestable. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a teju then it is both not uncomplimentary and noncausative. sent15: the tribologist is not unsurmountable and is not amphoteric if it is not unseaworthy. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__