the fact that something does ramble leer but it is not mild is incorrect.
sent1: if something that does whoop rambles SAS then that it is not genial hold. sent2: the press is not a MOT if that the acetin does not ramble leer hold. sent3: something does ramble leer and is mild. sent4: the interreflection does not whoop if it is a kind of an exhortation. sent5: the interreflection is an exhortation. sent6: if the acetin does ramble leer the brattice ramble leer but it is not mild. sent7: if something does not ramble SAS then the fact that it is non-genial thing that does ramble leer is not true. sent8: the brattice is not a Gibraltar. sent9: if the fact that the acetin is not genial but it does ramble leer is not true the interreflection is not a MOT. sent10: if the interreflection is an exhortation it is not a kind of a whoop and does ramble SAS. sent11: the press is not a kind of a MOT. sent12: the brattice does ramble leer. sent13: the brattice rambles leer if the acetin does rambles leer. sent14: the press is a kind of a Gibraltar that is not a MOT if the acetin does not ramble leer. sent15: the interreflection is not genial if it is a whoop and it does ramble SAS. sent16: the interreflection is a Gibraltar. sent17: the interreflection is not a whoop. sent18: the interreflection is genial if the press is a Gibraltar and it is a kind of a MOT. sent19: the interreflection is genial if the press is a Gibraltar that is not a MOT. sent20: there is something such that it is not mild. sent21: something that is not a whoop and rambles SAS is not genial. sent22: there is something such that it rambles leer. sent23: the brattice is not a kind of a MOT but it rambles leer if it is a kind of a whoop.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acetin does not ramble leer.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the press is a Gibraltar but it is not a MOT.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the interreflection is genial.; sent21 -> int3: the interreflection is not genial if it is not a kind of a whoop and it rambles SAS.; sent10 & sent5 -> int4: the interreflection is not a whoop and rambles SAS.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the interreflection is not genial.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the acetin does ramble leer.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the brattice does ramble leer and is not mild.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the interreflection is not a kind of a MOT.
sent7 -> int9: the fact that the acetin is not genial and does ramble leer does not hold if it does not ramble SAS.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something does ramble leer but it is not mild is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does whoop rambles SAS then that it is not genial hold. sent2: the press is not a MOT if that the acetin does not ramble leer hold. sent3: something does ramble leer and is mild. sent4: the interreflection does not whoop if it is a kind of an exhortation. sent5: the interreflection is an exhortation. sent6: if the acetin does ramble leer the brattice ramble leer but it is not mild. sent7: if something does not ramble SAS then the fact that it is non-genial thing that does ramble leer is not true. sent8: the brattice is not a Gibraltar. sent9: if the fact that the acetin is not genial but it does ramble leer is not true the interreflection is not a MOT. sent10: if the interreflection is an exhortation it is not a kind of a whoop and does ramble SAS. sent11: the press is not a kind of a MOT. sent12: the brattice does ramble leer. sent13: the brattice rambles leer if the acetin does rambles leer. sent14: the press is a kind of a Gibraltar that is not a MOT if the acetin does not ramble leer. sent15: the interreflection is not genial if it is a whoop and it does ramble SAS. sent16: the interreflection is a Gibraltar. sent17: the interreflection is not a whoop. sent18: the interreflection is genial if the press is a Gibraltar and it is a kind of a MOT. sent19: the interreflection is genial if the press is a Gibraltar that is not a MOT. sent20: there is something such that it is not mild. sent21: something that is not a whoop and rambles SAS is not genial. sent22: there is something such that it rambles leer. sent23: the brattice is not a kind of a MOT but it rambles leer if it is a kind of a whoop. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acetin does not ramble leer.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the press is a Gibraltar but it is not a MOT.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the interreflection is genial.; sent21 -> int3: the interreflection is not genial if it is not a kind of a whoop and it rambles SAS.; sent10 & sent5 -> int4: the interreflection is not a whoop and rambles SAS.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the interreflection is not genial.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the acetin does ramble leer.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the brattice does ramble leer and is not mild.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__