the breeches does not nest fusil and is a deservingness.
sent1: the fact that the fusil is non-microcephalic thing that is not a outercourse is incorrect. sent2: that the Uriah arrives is true if the fact that it does not arrives and it does not neglect bombproof does not hold. sent3: if the martinet does neglect bombproof and is a outercourse the fusil is not microcephalic. sent4: that the martinet is not microcephalic is true if the fusil neglects bombproof and is a flower-of-an-hour. sent5: the martinet is a outercourse. sent6: if something does not neglect bombproof then the breeches does not nest fusil and is a deservingness. sent7: that something does not nest fusil and is a deservingness is not true if it neglects bombproof. sent8: that the fusil is not microcephalic and it is not a flower-of-an-hour is not true if there is something such that it is microcephalic. sent9: if the fact that something is not microcephalic and is not a flower-of-an-hour does not hold then it is microcephalic. sent10: the martinet is phagocytic thing that does nest Muztag. sent11: there exists something such that it is supernal. sent12: the breeches is not a flower-of-an-hour if there is something such that it does not nest fusil. sent13: something neglects bombproof and it is a outercourse if it is not microcephalic. sent14: the fact that the martinet is not a deservingness hold. sent15: the bacteriochlorophyll is not a deservingness if the martinet is a deservingness and is not a outercourse. sent16: there exists something such that it is microcephalic. sent17: the fusil is not a deservingness. sent18: if there exists something such that that it is not microcephalic is not wrong then the fact that the fusil is not a kind of a deservingness is not false. sent19: the martinet is not a Cynoscion if it is phagocytic and nests Muztag. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it neglects Hawthorne is correct. sent21: something is a kind of a deservingness. sent22: the fact that the martinet does not neglect bombproof and does not nest fusil is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the martinet neglects bombproof.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the martinet does neglect bombproof and it is a kind of a outercourse.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fusil is not microcephalic.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the fusil is not microcephalic and it is not a flower-of-an-hour is wrong then that it is microcephalic is correct.; sent16 & sent8 -> int4: that the fusil is not microcephalic and is not a flower-of-an-hour is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fusil is microcephalic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the martinet does not neglect bombproof.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it does not neglect bombproof.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the breeches does not nest fusil but it is a deservingness is not right.
sent7 -> int9: if the breeches does neglect bombproof that it does not nest fusil and it is a kind of a deservingness is incorrect.; sent13 -> int10: if the breeches is not microcephalic it does neglect bombproof and it is a outercourse.; sent19 & sent10 -> int11: the martinet is not a Cynoscion.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is not a Cynoscion.;
$hypothesis$ = the breeches does not nest fusil and is a deservingness. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fusil is non-microcephalic thing that is not a outercourse is incorrect. sent2: that the Uriah arrives is true if the fact that it does not arrives and it does not neglect bombproof does not hold. sent3: if the martinet does neglect bombproof and is a outercourse the fusil is not microcephalic. sent4: that the martinet is not microcephalic is true if the fusil neglects bombproof and is a flower-of-an-hour. sent5: the martinet is a outercourse. sent6: if something does not neglect bombproof then the breeches does not nest fusil and is a deservingness. sent7: that something does not nest fusil and is a deservingness is not true if it neglects bombproof. sent8: that the fusil is not microcephalic and it is not a flower-of-an-hour is not true if there is something such that it is microcephalic. sent9: if the fact that something is not microcephalic and is not a flower-of-an-hour does not hold then it is microcephalic. sent10: the martinet is phagocytic thing that does nest Muztag. sent11: there exists something such that it is supernal. sent12: the breeches is not a flower-of-an-hour if there is something such that it does not nest fusil. sent13: something neglects bombproof and it is a outercourse if it is not microcephalic. sent14: the fact that the martinet is not a deservingness hold. sent15: the bacteriochlorophyll is not a deservingness if the martinet is a deservingness and is not a outercourse. sent16: there exists something such that it is microcephalic. sent17: the fusil is not a deservingness. sent18: if there exists something such that that it is not microcephalic is not wrong then the fact that the fusil is not a kind of a deservingness is not false. sent19: the martinet is not a Cynoscion if it is phagocytic and nests Muztag. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it neglects Hawthorne is correct. sent21: something is a kind of a deservingness. sent22: the fact that the martinet does not neglect bombproof and does not nest fusil is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the martinet neglects bombproof.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the martinet does neglect bombproof and it is a kind of a outercourse.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fusil is not microcephalic.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the fusil is not microcephalic and it is not a flower-of-an-hour is wrong then that it is microcephalic is correct.; sent16 & sent8 -> int4: that the fusil is not microcephalic and is not a flower-of-an-hour is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fusil is microcephalic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the martinet does not neglect bombproof.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it does not neglect bombproof.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__