that the obliger is a kind of a Solzhenitsyn and is unidimensional is false.
sent1: the obliger is a kind of a ceramic. sent2: the hurricane is not a ceramic if the item is a kind of discordant a aerogram. sent3: the sophisticate either does headquarter Nubia or is not a protoplasm or both if the fail-safe is a clearance. sent4: that the obliger is an oriented and it is instructional is incorrect. sent5: if the fail-safe headquarters convalescent then the fact that it does not foam and does not headquarter alphabetizer is not true. sent6: the fact that if the fact that the obliger is the oriented but it is non-instructional does not hold then the obliger is not a ceramic is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that if the hurricane is discordant the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn is not wrong. sent8: the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn if the hurricane is a Solzhenitsyn. sent9: if the hurricane is unidimensional the emeritus does orient. sent10: the hurricane is not non-unidimensional if the item is a ceramic. sent11: if something that does not headquarter Nubia is a clearance it is not a kind of a protoplasm. sent12: if something is not unidimensional the fact that it is an oriented and is instructional is not true. sent13: the item is a aerogram. sent14: if the obliger is instructional then it is not a ceramic. sent15: if something is not a protoplasm then it is discordant and it is a kind of a aerogram. sent16: the fact that something does orient but it is not instructional is incorrect if it is not unidimensional. sent17: if that the fail-safe is not a foam and it does not headquarter alphabetizer is not correct then it is a kind of a clearance. sent18: that the obliger is an oriented and it is instructional is not right if it is not unidimensional. sent19: the item is a kind of a ceramic if the convalescent is both not a Solzhenitsyn and discordant. sent20: either the hurricane is discordant or it is a Solzhenitsyn or both if there is something such that it is a kind of a aerogram. sent21: that the hurricane is a ceramic is right. sent22: that the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn but it is not discordant is false.
sent16 -> int1: that the obliger is an oriented that is non-instructional does not hold if that it is not unidimensional is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the obliger is not unidimensional.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the obliger is an oriented and not instructional does not hold.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the obliger is not a kind of a ceramic.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the obliger is unidimensional hold.; sent13 -> int6: there is something such that it is a aerogram.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the hurricane is either discordant or a Solzhenitsyn or both.; int7 & sent7 & sent8 -> int8: the fact that the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn hold.; int5 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn and is unidimensional is incorrect.
sent15 -> int9: if that the item is not a protoplasm is not incorrect it is discordant and is a aerogram.; sent11 -> int10: the item is not a kind of a protoplasm if it does not headquarter Nubia and it is a kind of a clearance.;
$hypothesis$ = that the obliger is a kind of a Solzhenitsyn and is unidimensional is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the obliger is a kind of a ceramic. sent2: the hurricane is not a ceramic if the item is a kind of discordant a aerogram. sent3: the sophisticate either does headquarter Nubia or is not a protoplasm or both if the fail-safe is a clearance. sent4: that the obliger is an oriented and it is instructional is incorrect. sent5: if the fail-safe headquarters convalescent then the fact that it does not foam and does not headquarter alphabetizer is not true. sent6: the fact that if the fact that the obliger is the oriented but it is non-instructional does not hold then the obliger is not a ceramic is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that if the hurricane is discordant the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn is not wrong. sent8: the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn if the hurricane is a Solzhenitsyn. sent9: if the hurricane is unidimensional the emeritus does orient. sent10: the hurricane is not non-unidimensional if the item is a ceramic. sent11: if something that does not headquarter Nubia is a clearance it is not a kind of a protoplasm. sent12: if something is not unidimensional the fact that it is an oriented and is instructional is not true. sent13: the item is a aerogram. sent14: if the obliger is instructional then it is not a ceramic. sent15: if something is not a protoplasm then it is discordant and it is a kind of a aerogram. sent16: the fact that something does orient but it is not instructional is incorrect if it is not unidimensional. sent17: if that the fail-safe is not a foam and it does not headquarter alphabetizer is not correct then it is a kind of a clearance. sent18: that the obliger is an oriented and it is instructional is not right if it is not unidimensional. sent19: the item is a kind of a ceramic if the convalescent is both not a Solzhenitsyn and discordant. sent20: either the hurricane is discordant or it is a Solzhenitsyn or both if there is something such that it is a kind of a aerogram. sent21: that the hurricane is a ceramic is right. sent22: that the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn but it is not discordant is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: that the obliger is an oriented that is non-instructional does not hold if that it is not unidimensional is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the obliger is not unidimensional.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the obliger is an oriented and not instructional does not hold.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the obliger is not a kind of a ceramic.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the obliger is unidimensional hold.; sent13 -> int6: there is something such that it is a aerogram.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the hurricane is either discordant or a Solzhenitsyn or both.; int7 & sent7 & sent8 -> int8: the fact that the obliger is a Solzhenitsyn hold.; int5 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__