the videotaping does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the exceeding Simenon does not occur is not incorrect if that the exceeding crocus happens is not correct. sent2: the label does not occur and the draping yarmulke does not occur. sent3: that the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee happens is not true if the seriousness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the exceeding ornithopod occurs but the jellifying akee does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the seriousness does not occur if the ELINT happens and the vestal occurs. sent6: the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee does not occur if the exceeding Simenon does not occur. sent7: if the seriousness does not occur that the exceeding ornithopod but not the jellifying akee occurs is not correct. sent8: the rein does not occur but the aphasic occurs. sent9: the fact that not the exceeding ornithopod but the jellifying akee happens is incorrect. sent10: the ELINT is brought about by that the refreshment happens. sent11: the exceeding unscrupulousness does not occur. sent12: that the distributiveness and the tremolo occurs is not incorrect. sent13: the austeniticness occurs. sent14: that the jellifying akee does not occur triggers the vestal or that the seriousness occurs or both. sent15: the exceeding Simenon does not occur if that the draping fight and the exceeding crocus happens is wrong. sent16: the fact that the draping fight occurs and the exceeding crocus happens is wrong. sent17: the vestalness happens. sent18: the distributiveness occurs. sent19: if the seriousness does not occur then the fact that the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee does not occur is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the refreshment occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the ELINT occurs.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the ELINT and the vestal happens hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the seriousness does not occur.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the fact that the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee does not occur is not correct.; sent15 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the exceeding Simenon does not occur is correct.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the refreshment does not occur is not wrong.; sent12 -> int9: the tremolo happens.; int8 & int9 -> int10: not the refreshment but the tremolo happens.;
the videotape happens.
$hypothesis$ = the videotaping does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the exceeding Simenon does not occur is not incorrect if that the exceeding crocus happens is not correct. sent2: the label does not occur and the draping yarmulke does not occur. sent3: that the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee happens is not true if the seriousness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the exceeding ornithopod occurs but the jellifying akee does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the seriousness does not occur if the ELINT happens and the vestal occurs. sent6: the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee does not occur if the exceeding Simenon does not occur. sent7: if the seriousness does not occur that the exceeding ornithopod but not the jellifying akee occurs is not correct. sent8: the rein does not occur but the aphasic occurs. sent9: the fact that not the exceeding ornithopod but the jellifying akee happens is incorrect. sent10: the ELINT is brought about by that the refreshment happens. sent11: the exceeding unscrupulousness does not occur. sent12: that the distributiveness and the tremolo occurs is not incorrect. sent13: the austeniticness occurs. sent14: that the jellifying akee does not occur triggers the vestal or that the seriousness occurs or both. sent15: the exceeding Simenon does not occur if that the draping fight and the exceeding crocus happens is wrong. sent16: the fact that the draping fight occurs and the exceeding crocus happens is wrong. sent17: the vestalness happens. sent18: the distributiveness occurs. sent19: if the seriousness does not occur then the fact that the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee does not occur is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the refreshment occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the ELINT occurs.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the ELINT and the vestal happens hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the seriousness does not occur.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the fact that the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee does not occur is not correct.; sent15 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the exceeding Simenon does not occur is correct.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the exceeding ornithopod does not occur and the jellifying akee does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the refreshment does not occur is not wrong.; sent12 -> int9: the tremolo happens.; int8 & int9 -> int10: not the refreshment but the tremolo happens.; __UNKNOWN__