the saponaceousness occurs.
sent1: not the redemption but the dichotomizing occurs. sent2: the trafficking occurs. sent3: the ambulation does not occur. sent4: if that the impoliticness does not occur is correct then not the saponaceousness but the seeping dovekie happens. sent5: the dictating background happens if the offensiveness happens. sent6: the confession does not occur if the fact that the arrival but not the seeping Giraffidae happens does not hold. sent7: the fact that the ritualism happens and the birth happens is incorrect. sent8: the oceanicness does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the seeping dovekie and the works happens is not right the seeping dovekie does not occur. sent10: the ligature does not occur. sent11: the dark does not occur. sent12: if the oceanicness does not occur but the impoliticness happens the offensiveness happens. sent13: the cirrocumulus does not occur. sent14: that the offensiveness occurs but the dictating background does not occur does not hold if the seeping dovekie does not occur. sent15: that both the despite and the confession happens is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the working occurs and the dictating background occurs is not correct. sent17: if the dictating prod happens that the arrival occurs but the seeping Giraffidae does not occur is not right. sent18: the rake happens. sent19: if the confession does not occur the fact that the seeping dovekie and the working happens does not hold. sent20: if the fact that the works and the dictating background occurs does not hold that the dictating background does not occur hold. sent21: the fact that the seeping dovekie happens is not incorrect if the impoliticness does not occur. sent22: the fact that the fete does not occur is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impoliticness happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: not the oceanicness but the impoliticness occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the offensiveness occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the dictating background occurs is not wrong.; sent20 & sent16 -> int4: the dictating background does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the impoliticness does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: not the saponaceousness but the seeping dovekie occurs.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the saponaceousness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the saponaceousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: not the redemption but the dichotomizing occurs. sent2: the trafficking occurs. sent3: the ambulation does not occur. sent4: if that the impoliticness does not occur is correct then not the saponaceousness but the seeping dovekie happens. sent5: the dictating background happens if the offensiveness happens. sent6: the confession does not occur if the fact that the arrival but not the seeping Giraffidae happens does not hold. sent7: the fact that the ritualism happens and the birth happens is incorrect. sent8: the oceanicness does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the seeping dovekie and the works happens is not right the seeping dovekie does not occur. sent10: the ligature does not occur. sent11: the dark does not occur. sent12: if the oceanicness does not occur but the impoliticness happens the offensiveness happens. sent13: the cirrocumulus does not occur. sent14: that the offensiveness occurs but the dictating background does not occur does not hold if the seeping dovekie does not occur. sent15: that both the despite and the confession happens is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the working occurs and the dictating background occurs is not correct. sent17: if the dictating prod happens that the arrival occurs but the seeping Giraffidae does not occur is not right. sent18: the rake happens. sent19: if the confession does not occur the fact that the seeping dovekie and the working happens does not hold. sent20: if the fact that the works and the dictating background occurs does not hold that the dictating background does not occur hold. sent21: the fact that the seeping dovekie happens is not incorrect if the impoliticness does not occur. sent22: the fact that the fete does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impoliticness happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: not the oceanicness but the impoliticness occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the offensiveness occurs.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the dictating background occurs is not wrong.; sent20 & sent16 -> int4: the dictating background does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the impoliticness does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: not the saponaceousness but the seeping dovekie occurs.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__