that the shogi occurs prevents the non-tacticalness.
sent1: the absolution occurs. sent2: the breakthrough does not occur. sent3: the centesimalness and the introspectiveness happens. sent4: the breakthrough does not occur if the immolation does not occur. sent5: if the immolation does not occur the tacticalness but not the breakthrough occurs. sent6: the nebularness does not occur. sent7: the myringoplasty happens. sent8: the revenging ammonification occurs. sent9: the emblazoning equality but not the plumb occurs. sent10: the parching happens and the introspectiveness does not occur if the fact that the closing does not occur hold. sent11: the pastoral happens. sent12: that the inhibition happens and the consisting happens causes that the emblazoning white does not occur. sent13: if the absolution does not occur then both the settling bunk and the redemptiveness happens. sent14: the redemptiveness and the absolution occurs. sent15: if the javelin does not occur then the blasting but not the chauvinisticness occurs.
sent14 -> int1: the redemptiveness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shogi occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the redemptiveness and the shogi happens.;
both the settling bunk and the basketball occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the shogi occurs prevents the non-tacticalness. ; $context$ = sent1: the absolution occurs. sent2: the breakthrough does not occur. sent3: the centesimalness and the introspectiveness happens. sent4: the breakthrough does not occur if the immolation does not occur. sent5: if the immolation does not occur the tacticalness but not the breakthrough occurs. sent6: the nebularness does not occur. sent7: the myringoplasty happens. sent8: the revenging ammonification occurs. sent9: the emblazoning equality but not the plumb occurs. sent10: the parching happens and the introspectiveness does not occur if the fact that the closing does not occur hold. sent11: the pastoral happens. sent12: that the inhibition happens and the consisting happens causes that the emblazoning white does not occur. sent13: if the absolution does not occur then both the settling bunk and the redemptiveness happens. sent14: the redemptiveness and the absolution occurs. sent15: if the javelin does not occur then the blasting but not the chauvinisticness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the redemptiveness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shogi occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the redemptiveness and the shogi happens.; __UNKNOWN__