the lining does not occur.
sent1: the repeatableness happens but the annoying does not occur if the lithophyticness does not occur. sent2: that the Aramean happens causes that both the non-repeatableness and the non-lithophyticness occurs. sent3: the lithophyticness does not occur. sent4: the line happens if the drollery happens. sent5: the drollery does not occur. sent6: that the lining does not occur is not false if the forfeit but not the annoying happens. sent7: that the drollery and the annoying happens is caused by that the repeatableness does not occur. sent8: not the phase-out but the recessional occurs. sent9: the Arameanness occurs and the busking happens if the third does not occur. sent10: the repeatableness occurs if that the lithophyticness does not occur is not wrong.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the repeatableness but not the annoying occurs.; int1 -> int2: the annoying does not occur.;
the line occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the lining does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the repeatableness happens but the annoying does not occur if the lithophyticness does not occur. sent2: that the Aramean happens causes that both the non-repeatableness and the non-lithophyticness occurs. sent3: the lithophyticness does not occur. sent4: the line happens if the drollery happens. sent5: the drollery does not occur. sent6: that the lining does not occur is not false if the forfeit but not the annoying happens. sent7: that the drollery and the annoying happens is caused by that the repeatableness does not occur. sent8: not the phase-out but the recessional occurs. sent9: the Arameanness occurs and the busking happens if the third does not occur. sent10: the repeatableness occurs if that the lithophyticness does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the repeatableness but not the annoying occurs.; int1 -> int2: the annoying does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__