the marocain is not centralist.
sent1: something is calendric or it digs or both. sent2: if that something is a kind of a flat is right the rummy does dig and is not a NGF. sent3: the agama is not non-pituitary and not non-calendric. sent4: there exists something such that it is a pituitary. sent5: there exists something such that it is calendric. sent6: if the photojournalism is a impermanence but it is not a debate the ketoprofen is not a pituitary. sent7: the intersection does piece cheetah if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it does not piece cheetah and it is a tenantry is not false is false. sent8: the photojournalism pieces cheetah if the intersection pieces cheetah. sent9: the marocain is centralist if the fact that the ketoprofen is centralist is true. sent10: if the rummy is a flat that the photojournalism is a impermanence is true. sent11: the rummy is a kind of a dig. sent12: something is not a debate but it is a NGF if it does piece cheetah. sent13: if something is not a pituitary then it is centralist and/or is calendric. sent14: that the trigeminal does not piece cheetah and is a tenantry does not hold. sent15: the agama is a kind of a pituitary. sent16: the ketoprofen is a impermanence if a pituitary thing is calendric. sent17: if something is a kind of a flat that the rummy is a dig is correct. sent18: that the shotgun is not a kind of a hermitage is right if the fact that the Warner does scuff ketoprofen and/or it is not a kind of a hermitage is false. sent19: that that that the Warner scuffs ketoprofen or it is not a hermitage or both hold is wrong is right. sent20: if there exists something such that it does debate or is a impermanence or both then the photojournalism is a flat. sent21: something is flat and a dig if it is not a bullyboy. sent22: the fedelline sports but it does not dig.
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that it is both a pituitary and calendric.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the ketoprofen is a impermanence.; int2 -> int3: the ketoprofen either is a debate or is a kind of a impermanence or both.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a debate or is a impermanence or both.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the photojournalism is a kind of a flat.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a flat.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the rummy is a dig but it is not a kind of a NGF.;
the marocain is centralist.
sent13 -> int8: the ketoprofen is centralist and/or it is calendric if it is not pituitary.; sent21 -> int9: the rummy is a flat and digs if it is not a bullyboy.; sent18 & sent19 -> int10: the shotgun is not a hermitage.; int10 -> int11: something is not a kind of a hermitage.; sent12 -> int12: if the photojournalism pieces cheetah it is not a debate and it is a kind of a NGF.; sent14 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it does not piece cheetah and is a tenantry does not hold.; int13 & sent7 -> int14: the intersection pieces cheetah.; sent8 & int14 -> int15: the photojournalism pieces cheetah.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the photojournalism does not debate but it is a NGF.; int16 -> int17: the photojournalism is not a debate.;
$hypothesis$ = the marocain is not centralist. ; $context$ = sent1: something is calendric or it digs or both. sent2: if that something is a kind of a flat is right the rummy does dig and is not a NGF. sent3: the agama is not non-pituitary and not non-calendric. sent4: there exists something such that it is a pituitary. sent5: there exists something such that it is calendric. sent6: if the photojournalism is a impermanence but it is not a debate the ketoprofen is not a pituitary. sent7: the intersection does piece cheetah if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it does not piece cheetah and it is a tenantry is not false is false. sent8: the photojournalism pieces cheetah if the intersection pieces cheetah. sent9: the marocain is centralist if the fact that the ketoprofen is centralist is true. sent10: if the rummy is a flat that the photojournalism is a impermanence is true. sent11: the rummy is a kind of a dig. sent12: something is not a debate but it is a NGF if it does piece cheetah. sent13: if something is not a pituitary then it is centralist and/or is calendric. sent14: that the trigeminal does not piece cheetah and is a tenantry does not hold. sent15: the agama is a kind of a pituitary. sent16: the ketoprofen is a impermanence if a pituitary thing is calendric. sent17: if something is a kind of a flat that the rummy is a dig is correct. sent18: that the shotgun is not a kind of a hermitage is right if the fact that the Warner does scuff ketoprofen and/or it is not a kind of a hermitage is false. sent19: that that that the Warner scuffs ketoprofen or it is not a hermitage or both hold is wrong is right. sent20: if there exists something such that it does debate or is a impermanence or both then the photojournalism is a flat. sent21: something is flat and a dig if it is not a bullyboy. sent22: the fedelline sports but it does not dig. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that it is both a pituitary and calendric.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the ketoprofen is a impermanence.; int2 -> int3: the ketoprofen either is a debate or is a kind of a impermanence or both.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a debate or is a impermanence or both.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the photojournalism is a kind of a flat.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a flat.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the rummy is a dig but it is not a kind of a NGF.; __UNKNOWN__