that the irredentist is criminological is correct.
sent1: that everything is a kind of a porkpie is not incorrect. sent2: something is a kind of a quiddity if the fact that that it is a kind of a porkpie or it does not imply Thylacinus or both is correct does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the choppiness is a warhead and is not an elastic does not hold it is a kind of an elastic. sent4: the fact that something is a kind of a quiddity hold if the fact that it is not a porkpie and/or it does not imply Thylacinus is incorrect. sent5: the distributor is a kind of a porkpie. sent6: the irredentist is a Zeno. sent7: the fact that something is not a kind of a Zeno and it is not a desirability does not hold if that it racks hold. sent8: if the spoilsport is not criminological and it is not a kind of a quiddity then the irredentist is not criminological. sent9: the irredentist is a kind of a desirability if the fact that it is a kind of a rack hold. sent10: the fact that everything is worldly and connotes is not wrong. sent11: if that the openwork is not a kind of a Zeno and it is not a desirability does not hold the miller is a desirability. sent12: the hosiery does bear jackal and does tauten Wayne if something is a patternmaker. sent13: if the fact that something is not hot or is a kind of a warhead or both is not right then it is a Salian. sent14: something racks if it is a Zeno. sent15: something does not bear jackal but it does tauten Wayne if it is a patternmaker. sent16: there is nothing that is not a kind of a porkpie and/or does not imply Thylacinus. sent17: if the fact that the distributor is a porkpie and/or it does not imply Thylacinus is false then it is a quiddity. sent18: if something is an elastic it racks. sent19: if something is a desirability then that it is a patternmaker is right. sent20: if something is worldly that it is a warhead and it is not elastic is not right. sent21: that something is not nonrepresentative and/or it is not a kind of a quiddity is wrong if it is not criminological. sent22: the openwork is a kind of a rack if the fact that the choppiness is a rack is correct.
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the distributor either is not a porkpie or does not imply Thylacinus or both is wrong.; sent4 -> int2: that the distributor is a kind of a quiddity hold if the fact that it either is not a porkpie or does not imply Thylacinus or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the distributor is a quiddity.;
the fact that the ballroom is not nonrepresentative and/or it is not a kind of a quiddity does not hold.
sent21 -> int4: if the ballroom is not criminological that it is not nonrepresentative or is not a quiddity or both is false.; sent15 -> int5: the irredentist does not bear jackal and tautens Wayne if it is a kind of a patternmaker.; sent19 -> int6: the irredentist is a kind of a patternmaker if it is a kind of a desirability.; sent14 -> int7: the irredentist does rack if the fact that it is a kind of a Zeno hold.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the irredentist is a rack.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the irredentist is a kind of a desirability.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the irredentist is a kind of a patternmaker.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the irredentist does not bear jackal but it tautens Wayne is not incorrect.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it does not bear jackal and tautens Wayne.;
$hypothesis$ = that the irredentist is criminological is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that everything is a kind of a porkpie is not incorrect. sent2: something is a kind of a quiddity if the fact that that it is a kind of a porkpie or it does not imply Thylacinus or both is correct does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the choppiness is a warhead and is not an elastic does not hold it is a kind of an elastic. sent4: the fact that something is a kind of a quiddity hold if the fact that it is not a porkpie and/or it does not imply Thylacinus is incorrect. sent5: the distributor is a kind of a porkpie. sent6: the irredentist is a Zeno. sent7: the fact that something is not a kind of a Zeno and it is not a desirability does not hold if that it racks hold. sent8: if the spoilsport is not criminological and it is not a kind of a quiddity then the irredentist is not criminological. sent9: the irredentist is a kind of a desirability if the fact that it is a kind of a rack hold. sent10: the fact that everything is worldly and connotes is not wrong. sent11: if that the openwork is not a kind of a Zeno and it is not a desirability does not hold the miller is a desirability. sent12: the hosiery does bear jackal and does tauten Wayne if something is a patternmaker. sent13: if the fact that something is not hot or is a kind of a warhead or both is not right then it is a Salian. sent14: something racks if it is a Zeno. sent15: something does not bear jackal but it does tauten Wayne if it is a patternmaker. sent16: there is nothing that is not a kind of a porkpie and/or does not imply Thylacinus. sent17: if the fact that the distributor is a porkpie and/or it does not imply Thylacinus is false then it is a quiddity. sent18: if something is an elastic it racks. sent19: if something is a desirability then that it is a patternmaker is right. sent20: if something is worldly that it is a warhead and it is not elastic is not right. sent21: that something is not nonrepresentative and/or it is not a kind of a quiddity is wrong if it is not criminological. sent22: the openwork is a kind of a rack if the fact that the choppiness is a rack is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the distributor either is not a porkpie or does not imply Thylacinus or both is wrong.; sent4 -> int2: that the distributor is a kind of a quiddity hold if the fact that it either is not a porkpie or does not imply Thylacinus or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the distributor is a quiddity.; __UNKNOWN__