the grist dispenses.
sent1: if something is branchy then it is sonic. sent2: that the dockside is familial hold. sent3: the glassmaker does not single Nanning if there are savory things. sent4: the ammonia is a kind of a constitutionalism. sent5: the fact that the grist is not a schmuck but a ephah is not incorrect. sent6: the iodocompound is not a kind of a savory if the joggle is not familial and/or does not single ventricle. sent7: the grist does dispense if the fact that the ammonia is not comfortable and it does not dispense is incorrect. sent8: the dockside is a constitutionalism if it is familial. sent9: there is something such that it is a kind of a checksum. sent10: the grist does not dispense if the glassmaker does not single Nanning and is coherent. sent11: the hooks singles Seth and is coherent. sent12: everything is a kind of a savory that is familial. sent13: if the ammonia is not comfortable then it is a kind of a constitutionalism. sent14: that everything is familial hold. sent15: the glassmaker is coherent if the ammonia relaxes. sent16: the ammonia is not a carcinogen but it is a Helen. sent17: the glassmaker is a kind of a savory if the dockside does single Nanning. sent18: the glassmaker does not relax if that the dockside does not single Nanning and it is not coherent does not hold. sent19: if the ammonia is not comfortable it is a kind of a constitutionalism and it singles resurvey. sent20: if something does single resurvey the fact that it does relax hold. sent21: the fact that the dockside does not single Nanning and it is not coherent is not true if the iodocompound is not savory. sent22: the ammonia is not comfortable. sent23: the grist is a kind of a cry and is a wanton. sent24: if the dockside does not single Nanning and is familial the glassmaker does not dispense. sent25: if something reciprocates then it is unalert. sent26: the ammonia is not a narcotic.
sent19 & sent22 -> int1: the ammonia is a constitutionalism and it singles resurvey.; int1 -> int2: the ammonia singles resurvey.; sent20 -> int3: if the ammonia singles resurvey it relaxes.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ammonia relaxes.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the glassmaker is not incoherent.; sent12 -> int6: the dockside is savory and it is familial.; int6 -> int7: the dockside is a kind of a savory.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a savory.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the glassmaker does not single Nanning.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the glassmaker does not single Nanning but it is coherent.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the grist does dispense.
$hypothesis$ = the grist dispenses. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is branchy then it is sonic. sent2: that the dockside is familial hold. sent3: the glassmaker does not single Nanning if there are savory things. sent4: the ammonia is a kind of a constitutionalism. sent5: the fact that the grist is not a schmuck but a ephah is not incorrect. sent6: the iodocompound is not a kind of a savory if the joggle is not familial and/or does not single ventricle. sent7: the grist does dispense if the fact that the ammonia is not comfortable and it does not dispense is incorrect. sent8: the dockside is a constitutionalism if it is familial. sent9: there is something such that it is a kind of a checksum. sent10: the grist does not dispense if the glassmaker does not single Nanning and is coherent. sent11: the hooks singles Seth and is coherent. sent12: everything is a kind of a savory that is familial. sent13: if the ammonia is not comfortable then it is a kind of a constitutionalism. sent14: that everything is familial hold. sent15: the glassmaker is coherent if the ammonia relaxes. sent16: the ammonia is not a carcinogen but it is a Helen. sent17: the glassmaker is a kind of a savory if the dockside does single Nanning. sent18: the glassmaker does not relax if that the dockside does not single Nanning and it is not coherent does not hold. sent19: if the ammonia is not comfortable it is a kind of a constitutionalism and it singles resurvey. sent20: if something does single resurvey the fact that it does relax hold. sent21: the fact that the dockside does not single Nanning and it is not coherent is not true if the iodocompound is not savory. sent22: the ammonia is not comfortable. sent23: the grist is a kind of a cry and is a wanton. sent24: if the dockside does not single Nanning and is familial the glassmaker does not dispense. sent25: if something reciprocates then it is unalert. sent26: the ammonia is not a narcotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent22 -> int1: the ammonia is a constitutionalism and it singles resurvey.; int1 -> int2: the ammonia singles resurvey.; sent20 -> int3: if the ammonia singles resurvey it relaxes.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ammonia relaxes.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the glassmaker is not incoherent.; sent12 -> int6: the dockside is savory and it is familial.; int6 -> int7: the dockside is a kind of a savory.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a savory.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the glassmaker does not single Nanning.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the glassmaker does not single Nanning but it is coherent.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__