that the shark is not a kind of a hula-hoop and it does not surface Scythian is true.
sent1: if the polymorphism does not spoil Danaea then the fact that the pika is both overhand and not a natural is incorrect. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it does amplify sublease is not false the shark does not surface Scythian. sent3: if the shark is not a kind of a hula-hoop the fact that the pika is a kind of a natural that amplifies sublease is wrong. sent4: if that the fact that the pika is overhand but it is not a kind of a natural does not hold is not incorrect then the arthromere amplifies sublease. sent5: that the pika is a kind of a hula-hoop that is overhand does not hold. sent6: the pika is not a hula-hoop and does not surface Scythian if there is something such that it is overhand. sent7: the shark is a natural. sent8: the polymorphism does not spoil Danaea. sent9: the fact that the pika is a kind of natural a hula-hoop does not hold. sent10: the polymorphism does not debrief shark. sent11: the fact that the shark is a kind of a hula-hoop that is overhand is not true. sent12: the paparazzo does not spoil Danaea and it is not an act. sent13: the fact that the shark does surface Scythian and does not amplify sublease does not hold. sent14: if something spoils Danaea then the fact that it is not a hula-hoop and does not surface Scythian does not hold. sent15: the arthromere does amplify sublease if the pika is natural. sent16: if the arthromere is not a natural the fact that the pika surfaces Scythian and it does amplify sublease does not hold. sent17: The Danaea does not spoil polymorphism. sent18: the shark is not a hula-hoop and it does not surface Scythian if something amplifies sublease.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the pika is overhand but it is not a natural is wrong.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the arthromere amplifies sublease.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does amplify sublease.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the shark is not a hula-hoop and it does not surface Scythian is false.
sent14 -> int4: if the shark does spoil Danaea that it is not a kind of a hula-hoop and it does not surface Scythian is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the shark is not a kind of a hula-hoop and it does not surface Scythian is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the polymorphism does not spoil Danaea then the fact that the pika is both overhand and not a natural is incorrect. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it does amplify sublease is not false the shark does not surface Scythian. sent3: if the shark is not a kind of a hula-hoop the fact that the pika is a kind of a natural that amplifies sublease is wrong. sent4: if that the fact that the pika is overhand but it is not a kind of a natural does not hold is not incorrect then the arthromere amplifies sublease. sent5: that the pika is a kind of a hula-hoop that is overhand does not hold. sent6: the pika is not a hula-hoop and does not surface Scythian if there is something such that it is overhand. sent7: the shark is a natural. sent8: the polymorphism does not spoil Danaea. sent9: the fact that the pika is a kind of natural a hula-hoop does not hold. sent10: the polymorphism does not debrief shark. sent11: the fact that the shark is a kind of a hula-hoop that is overhand is not true. sent12: the paparazzo does not spoil Danaea and it is not an act. sent13: the fact that the shark does surface Scythian and does not amplify sublease does not hold. sent14: if something spoils Danaea then the fact that it is not a hula-hoop and does not surface Scythian does not hold. sent15: the arthromere does amplify sublease if the pika is natural. sent16: if the arthromere is not a natural the fact that the pika surfaces Scythian and it does amplify sublease does not hold. sent17: The Danaea does not spoil polymorphism. sent18: the shark is not a hula-hoop and it does not surface Scythian if something amplifies sublease. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the pika is overhand but it is not a natural is wrong.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the arthromere amplifies sublease.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does amplify sublease.; int3 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__