there exists something such that if that it is not thirsty and is a kind of a impetuousness does not hold then it is not unfaithful.
sent1: something is not thirsty if the fact that it is not a kind of a boot and it does infiltrate is false. sent2: if the fact that the whale is a impetuousness and it is a kind of a Chavez is not right it is not parental. sent3: the fact that the whale is not unfaithful is not false if the fact that it is a kind of non-thirsty thing that is a impetuousness is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a saltbox and not non-chordal does not hold then it does not moor ash-key. sent5: if the fact that the whale is non-thirsty a impetuousness does not hold then it is unfaithful. sent6: the whale does not moor loofa if it is both not a guaiacum and imperialistic. sent7: the whale is not unfaithful if that it is a kind of non-thirsty thing that is a impetuousness is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a repatriation then it is not a Jena. sent9: if the whale is thirsty that it is not unfaithful hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a impetuousness it is not unfaithful. sent11: there is something such that if it is not thirsty and it is a kind of a impetuousness the fact that it is not unfaithful is right. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not an okra and it is a minim does not hold the fact that it is not ceric is false. sent13: there is something such that if that it is a kind of non-thirsty thing that is a impetuousness is wrong it is unfaithful. sent14: if the fact that that the whale is not a kind of a impetuousness and does besiege unexchangeability is not wrong is not correct then it is not a kind of a Karnataka. sent15: the whale is a Goodall if that it is not a Matisse but unfaithful is not correct. sent16: there exists something such that if it is thirsty it is not unfaithful. sent17: there is something such that if it does not besiege wheelchair and does moor Brama then it is corrigible. sent18: there exists something such that if that it is both thirsty and a impetuousness does not hold then it is not unfaithful.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the calcification is not thirsty if the fact that it is not a boot and it infiltrates is not correct.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not thirsty and is a kind of a impetuousness does not hold then it is not unfaithful. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not thirsty if the fact that it is not a kind of a boot and it does infiltrate is false. sent2: if the fact that the whale is a impetuousness and it is a kind of a Chavez is not right it is not parental. sent3: the fact that the whale is not unfaithful is not false if the fact that it is a kind of non-thirsty thing that is a impetuousness is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is a saltbox and not non-chordal does not hold then it does not moor ash-key. sent5: if the fact that the whale is non-thirsty a impetuousness does not hold then it is unfaithful. sent6: the whale does not moor loofa if it is both not a guaiacum and imperialistic. sent7: the whale is not unfaithful if that it is a kind of non-thirsty thing that is a impetuousness is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a repatriation then it is not a Jena. sent9: if the whale is thirsty that it is not unfaithful hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a impetuousness it is not unfaithful. sent11: there is something such that if it is not thirsty and it is a kind of a impetuousness the fact that it is not unfaithful is right. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not an okra and it is a minim does not hold the fact that it is not ceric is false. sent13: there is something such that if that it is a kind of non-thirsty thing that is a impetuousness is wrong it is unfaithful. sent14: if the fact that that the whale is not a kind of a impetuousness and does besiege unexchangeability is not wrong is not correct then it is not a kind of a Karnataka. sent15: the whale is a Goodall if that it is not a Matisse but unfaithful is not correct. sent16: there exists something such that if it is thirsty it is not unfaithful. sent17: there is something such that if it does not besiege wheelchair and does moor Brama then it is corrigible. sent18: there exists something such that if that it is both thirsty and a impetuousness does not hold then it is not unfaithful. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__