there is something such that if the fact that it does not premeditate kat and is not a IQ is not true then it is excusable.
sent1: the necktie is surficial if the fact that it is a kind of non-stipendiary thing that is not exuvial does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is a IQ then it is excusable. sent3: if the fact that the stepdaughter is both not a IQ and not a recall is false it ventilates segregationism. sent4: if that that the sprawler is not a IQ and is non-opisthognathous hold is not true it is a spreadsheet. sent5: there is something such that if it does not premeditate kat and is not a IQ then it is excusable. sent6: something does premeditate kat if that it does not band bungler and it is indehiscent does not hold. sent7: if that the fact that the stepdaughter does premeditate kat but it is not a IQ is not right hold it is excusable. sent8: the stepdaughter is excusable if it does not premeditate kat and is not a IQ. sent9: the stepdaughter is excusable if it is a IQ. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it does not premeditate kat and is a kind of a IQ is not right then it is excusable. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is both a moss and not extensive is not right it does tail. sent12: if the fact that the stepdaughter does not premeditate kat and it is not a IQ does not hold that it is not excusable does not hold.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the gunman premeditates kat is not incorrect if that it does not band bungler and it is not dehiscent is not true.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it does not premeditate kat and is not a IQ is not true then it is excusable. ; $context$ = sent1: the necktie is surficial if the fact that it is a kind of non-stipendiary thing that is not exuvial does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is a IQ then it is excusable. sent3: if the fact that the stepdaughter is both not a IQ and not a recall is false it ventilates segregationism. sent4: if that that the sprawler is not a IQ and is non-opisthognathous hold is not true it is a spreadsheet. sent5: there is something such that if it does not premeditate kat and is not a IQ then it is excusable. sent6: something does premeditate kat if that it does not band bungler and it is indehiscent does not hold. sent7: if that the fact that the stepdaughter does premeditate kat but it is not a IQ is not right hold it is excusable. sent8: the stepdaughter is excusable if it does not premeditate kat and is not a IQ. sent9: the stepdaughter is excusable if it is a IQ. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it does not premeditate kat and is a kind of a IQ is not right then it is excusable. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is both a moss and not extensive is not right it does tail. sent12: if the fact that the stepdaughter does not premeditate kat and it is not a IQ does not hold that it is not excusable does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__