the skull geminates inflammation but it is not triclinic.
sent1: The fact that the flask does rope bromoform is not incorrect. sent2: the skull does geminate inflammation and is not triclinic if the buster does geminate inflammation. sent3: the rigger does concoct rigger if there is something such that it is ecdemic and/or it does rope flask. sent4: the fact that the bromoform does rope flask is not incorrect. sent5: if something is a kind of a turban then it geminates inflammation. sent6: if the fact that the rigger concocts rigger is correct the buster is a turban.
sent4 -> int1: the bromoform is ecdemic or it ropes flask or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is ecdemic and/or it does rope flask.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the rigger concocts rigger.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the buster is a turban.; sent5 -> int5: if the buster is a turban then it geminates inflammation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the buster does geminate inflammation.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the skull geminates inflammation but it is not triclinic. ; $context$ = sent1: The fact that the flask does rope bromoform is not incorrect. sent2: the skull does geminate inflammation and is not triclinic if the buster does geminate inflammation. sent3: the rigger does concoct rigger if there is something such that it is ecdemic and/or it does rope flask. sent4: the fact that the bromoform does rope flask is not incorrect. sent5: if something is a kind of a turban then it geminates inflammation. sent6: if the fact that the rigger concocts rigger is correct the buster is a turban. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the bromoform is ecdemic or it ropes flask or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is ecdemic and/or it does rope flask.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the rigger concocts rigger.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the buster is a turban.; sent5 -> int5: if the buster is a turban then it geminates inflammation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the buster does geminate inflammation.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__