the fact that the coordination does not occur is not incorrect.
sent1: if the aeroliticness does not occur that the one-and-one and the SIGINT happens is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the one-and-one and the SIGINT occurs is incorrect then the one-and-one does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the commandership does not occur is not wrong then that the plop happens is correct. sent4: if the plop happens that the preparation occurs is not false. sent5: the aeroliticness does not occur and the liming skywalk happens. sent6: if the preparation does not occur that the plopping occurs but the coordination does not occur is false. sent7: that the assaying does not occur is correct. sent8: if the liming baseline happens the commandership does not occur and the acidimetricness occurs. sent9: that the SIGINT does not occur is triggered by that the countercurrent happens and the liming skywalk happens. sent10: if the one-and-one does not occur then the pouch happens and the repayment occurs. sent11: that the pouching but not the repayment occurs prevents that the preparation occurs. sent12: the liming baseline occurs. sent13: the liming clothespin does not occur and the memberlessness happens. sent14: that the repayment occurs is prevented by that the preparation and the coordination occurs. sent15: the coordination happens if the liming baseline does not occur.
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: the commandership does not occur but the acidimetricness happens.; int1 -> int2: the commandership does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the plop occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the preparation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coordination occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the preparation and the coordination occurs.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the repayment does not occur.; sent5 -> int7: the aeroliticness does not occur.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the fact that that both the one-and-one and the SIGINT occurs is correct is not correct.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the one-and-one does not occur.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: both the pouch and the repayment occurs.; int10 -> int11: the repayment occurs.; int6 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the thrum does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the coordination does not occur is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the aeroliticness does not occur that the one-and-one and the SIGINT happens is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the one-and-one and the SIGINT occurs is incorrect then the one-and-one does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the commandership does not occur is not wrong then that the plop happens is correct. sent4: if the plop happens that the preparation occurs is not false. sent5: the aeroliticness does not occur and the liming skywalk happens. sent6: if the preparation does not occur that the plopping occurs but the coordination does not occur is false. sent7: that the assaying does not occur is correct. sent8: if the liming baseline happens the commandership does not occur and the acidimetricness occurs. sent9: that the SIGINT does not occur is triggered by that the countercurrent happens and the liming skywalk happens. sent10: if the one-and-one does not occur then the pouch happens and the repayment occurs. sent11: that the pouching but not the repayment occurs prevents that the preparation occurs. sent12: the liming baseline occurs. sent13: the liming clothespin does not occur and the memberlessness happens. sent14: that the repayment occurs is prevented by that the preparation and the coordination occurs. sent15: the coordination happens if the liming baseline does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: the commandership does not occur but the acidimetricness happens.; int1 -> int2: the commandership does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the plop occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the preparation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coordination occurs.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the preparation and the coordination occurs.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the repayment does not occur.; sent5 -> int7: the aeroliticness does not occur.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the fact that that both the one-and-one and the SIGINT occurs is correct is not correct.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the one-and-one does not occur.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: both the pouch and the repayment occurs.; int10 -> int11: the repayment occurs.; int6 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__