the negotiator galls dysfunction.
sent1: the puncher does not gall dysfunction if it is not a kind of a tail and does not gall Isaiah. sent2: the fact that the puncher does not gall flagship or it is endometrial or both is not true if it is a Taiwanese. sent3: if there is something such that it is not a Taiwanese then the fact that the negotiator is a grama but it is reputable does not hold. sent4: if something galls Isaiah it is a nationalist. sent5: the fact that something is a kind of a nationalist that is not a kind of a Taiwanese is wrong if it is not disreputable. sent6: something is not a nationalist if the fact that it does not gall flagship and/or it is endometrial is not right. sent7: there is something such that that it is not lighted or a tail or both does not hold. sent8: if something does not gall dysfunction the fact that it is not a grama and it is not disreputable is incorrect. sent9: if something does not gall Isaiah that it is not disreputable and not a grama is correct. sent10: the puncher is a tail and does gall Isaiah.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the puncher is a kind of a Taiwanese.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the puncher does not gall flagship and/or is endometrial is wrong.; sent6 -> int2: if that the puncher does not gall flagship or it is endometrial or both is not correct then it is not a nationalist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the puncher is not a nationalist.; sent4 -> int4: the puncher is a kind of a nationalist if it galls Isaiah.; sent10 -> int5: the puncher does gall Isaiah.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the puncher is a kind of a nationalist.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the puncher is not Taiwanese.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is non-Taiwanese.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the fact that the negotiator is a grama but it is not disreputable is wrong.;
the negotiator does not gall dysfunction.
sent5 -> int11: if the puncher is not disreputable the fact that it is a kind of a nationalist and it is non-Taiwanese is false.; sent9 -> int12: the puncher is not disreputable and is not a grama if it does not gall Isaiah.;
$hypothesis$ = the negotiator galls dysfunction. ; $context$ = sent1: the puncher does not gall dysfunction if it is not a kind of a tail and does not gall Isaiah. sent2: the fact that the puncher does not gall flagship or it is endometrial or both is not true if it is a Taiwanese. sent3: if there is something such that it is not a Taiwanese then the fact that the negotiator is a grama but it is reputable does not hold. sent4: if something galls Isaiah it is a nationalist. sent5: the fact that something is a kind of a nationalist that is not a kind of a Taiwanese is wrong if it is not disreputable. sent6: something is not a nationalist if the fact that it does not gall flagship and/or it is endometrial is not right. sent7: there is something such that that it is not lighted or a tail or both does not hold. sent8: if something does not gall dysfunction the fact that it is not a grama and it is not disreputable is incorrect. sent9: if something does not gall Isaiah that it is not disreputable and not a grama is correct. sent10: the puncher is a tail and does gall Isaiah. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the puncher is a kind of a Taiwanese.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the puncher does not gall flagship and/or is endometrial is wrong.; sent6 -> int2: if that the puncher does not gall flagship or it is endometrial or both is not correct then it is not a nationalist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the puncher is not a nationalist.; sent4 -> int4: the puncher is a kind of a nationalist if it galls Isaiah.; sent10 -> int5: the puncher does gall Isaiah.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the puncher is a kind of a nationalist.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the puncher is not Taiwanese.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is non-Taiwanese.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the fact that the negotiator is a grama but it is not disreputable is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__