there exists something such that that it is not a reflux and it is not a viaduct is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the soutane leans carnosaur but it is not telegraphic is incorrect if that it is a reflux hold. sent2: something is not geographic and does not lean joiner. sent3: if something does lean Blighia then that it is not a reflux and is not a kind of a viaduct is not right. sent4: if the heir-at-law blinds Luwian then that it is a littoral and it does not blind archduchess is not true. sent5: The Blighia leans soutane. sent6: that something is not a reflux but it is a viaduct is false if it does lean Blighia. sent7: the fact that the soutane is not a kind of a reflux but it is a viaduct is wrong. sent8: there is something such that it does not lean problem and is not a Asio. sent9: that something does not happen and it does not powderize is incorrect if it does blind gorgerin. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a boards and it is not a kind of a gibibit is not true. sent11: the fact that the latitude is bathyal and is not a kind of a quahaug is false. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not lean amphitheater and it is a kind of a EGTK does not hold. sent13: if the amphitheater does lean Blighia that the maisonette does not repot clarification and it is not a kind of a drive is wrong. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of a reflux that is not a viaduct does not hold if it leans Blighia. sent15: there exists something such that it is not half and it is not a cased. sent16: the soutane is intradermal. sent17: that something is not a littoral and not a rhinolaryngology is not right if it is unsupportive. sent18: there is something such that that it is not a diplococcus and is not aluminous does not hold. sent19: there is something such that that it is not a Scriabin and not a rhinolaryngology is not right. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is a reflux and it is not a viaduct is not right. sent21: if the sniffler blinds Littorinidae then the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a reflux and does not blind archduchess hold is not correct. sent22: the fact that the soutane is not a reflux but a viaduct is not correct if it does lean Blighia.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that that the soutane is not a reflux and not a viaduct hold does not hold if it leans Blighia.;
that the maisonette does not repot clarification and does not drive is not right.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it is not a reflux and it is not a viaduct is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the soutane leans carnosaur but it is not telegraphic is incorrect if that it is a reflux hold. sent2: something is not geographic and does not lean joiner. sent3: if something does lean Blighia then that it is not a reflux and is not a kind of a viaduct is not right. sent4: if the heir-at-law blinds Luwian then that it is a littoral and it does not blind archduchess is not true. sent5: The Blighia leans soutane. sent6: that something is not a reflux but it is a viaduct is false if it does lean Blighia. sent7: the fact that the soutane is not a kind of a reflux but it is a viaduct is wrong. sent8: there is something such that it does not lean problem and is not a Asio. sent9: that something does not happen and it does not powderize is incorrect if it does blind gorgerin. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a boards and it is not a kind of a gibibit is not true. sent11: the fact that the latitude is bathyal and is not a kind of a quahaug is false. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not lean amphitheater and it is a kind of a EGTK does not hold. sent13: if the amphitheater does lean Blighia that the maisonette does not repot clarification and it is not a kind of a drive is wrong. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of a reflux that is not a viaduct does not hold if it leans Blighia. sent15: there exists something such that it is not half and it is not a cased. sent16: the soutane is intradermal. sent17: that something is not a littoral and not a rhinolaryngology is not right if it is unsupportive. sent18: there is something such that that it is not a diplococcus and is not aluminous does not hold. sent19: there is something such that that it is not a Scriabin and not a rhinolaryngology is not right. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is a reflux and it is not a viaduct is not right. sent21: if the sniffler blinds Littorinidae then the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a reflux and does not blind archduchess hold is not correct. sent22: the fact that the soutane is not a reflux but a viaduct is not correct if it does lean Blighia. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that that the soutane is not a reflux and not a viaduct hold does not hold if it leans Blighia.; __UNKNOWN__