that the watercolor does not occur or that the impiousness occurs or both is caused by that the intermediateness does not occur.
sent1: the nonsubmersibleness does not occur. sent2: that the modification does not occur hold if the fact that the intermediateness occurs and/or the watercolor does not occur is wrong. sent3: the watercolor or the impiousness or both happens. sent4: that the intermediate does not occur brings about that the watercolor occurs or the impiousness happens or both. sent5: both the impiousness and the Algonquianness occurs if the palatalizing Ovid does not occur. sent6: the fact that either the intermediateness occurs or the watercolor does not occur or both is not correct if the impiousness occurs. sent7: if the Labour does not occur the ignoring volution does not occur and the palatalizing Ovid does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the watercolor occurs.;
that the modification does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = that the watercolor does not occur or that the impiousness occurs or both is caused by that the intermediateness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the nonsubmersibleness does not occur. sent2: that the modification does not occur hold if the fact that the intermediateness occurs and/or the watercolor does not occur is wrong. sent3: the watercolor or the impiousness or both happens. sent4: that the intermediate does not occur brings about that the watercolor occurs or the impiousness happens or both. sent5: both the impiousness and the Algonquianness occurs if the palatalizing Ovid does not occur. sent6: the fact that either the intermediateness occurs or the watercolor does not occur or both is not correct if the impiousness occurs. sent7: if the Labour does not occur the ignoring volution does not occur and the palatalizing Ovid does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the watercolor occurs.; __UNKNOWN__