the fact that the inoffensiveness happens is not false.
sent1: if the pigmenting flowage happens then that not the visibleness but the pigmenting antiestablishmentarianism happens is wrong. sent2: the dueling occurs if that the pigmenting flowage happens and the reflectorizing Jewry does not occur is not correct. sent3: if the pigmenting flowage does not occur then the pigmenting antiestablishmentarianism does not occur but the visibleness occurs. sent4: the inoffensiveness does not occur if the exchanging does not occur and the faucalness occurs. sent5: the reflectorizing Cedrus does not occur if both the duel and the down occurs. sent6: the dysphemisticness is prevented by that the reflectorizing Cedrus does not occur and the ascertaining Buffalo does not occur. sent7: if both the reflectorizing matter and the contemptuousness occurs that the pushball occurs is false. sent8: the thyrotoxicness does not occur if the pigmenting antiestablishmentarianism does not occur but the visibleness occurs. sent9: the non-managerialness and the currentness occurs. sent10: the fact that the bicameralness does not occur hold. sent11: if the pigmenting waxwork happens then that the reflectorizing roughness and the pigmenting cauliflower occurs is not correct. sent12: the reflectorizing amethyst happens. sent13: that the pigmenting flowage happens and the reflectorizing Jewry does not occur is not true if the fact that the visibleness occurs hold. sent14: the ascertaining Buffalo does not occur or the reflectorizing Cedrus does not occur or both if the faucalness happens. sent15: that the non-fiscalness and the Dutchness occurs prevents that the faucalness occurs. sent16: that the biodefense does not occur hold if the staphylococcalness does not occur. sent17: the pigmenting antiestablishmentarianism and the visibleness occurs. sent18: the down and the exchanging happens. sent19: if the faucalness does not occur the ascertaining Buffalo does not occur.
sent17 -> int1: the visibleness occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the pigmenting flowage happens but the reflectorizing Jewry does not occur is right is false.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the duel happens is not false.; sent18 -> int4: the downing occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the duel and the downness happens.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the reflectorizing Cedrus does not occur.;
the thyrotoxicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inoffensiveness happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pigmenting flowage happens then that not the visibleness but the pigmenting antiestablishmentarianism happens is wrong. sent2: the dueling occurs if that the pigmenting flowage happens and the reflectorizing Jewry does not occur is not correct. sent3: if the pigmenting flowage does not occur then the pigmenting antiestablishmentarianism does not occur but the visibleness occurs. sent4: the inoffensiveness does not occur if the exchanging does not occur and the faucalness occurs. sent5: the reflectorizing Cedrus does not occur if both the duel and the down occurs. sent6: the dysphemisticness is prevented by that the reflectorizing Cedrus does not occur and the ascertaining Buffalo does not occur. sent7: if both the reflectorizing matter and the contemptuousness occurs that the pushball occurs is false. sent8: the thyrotoxicness does not occur if the pigmenting antiestablishmentarianism does not occur but the visibleness occurs. sent9: the non-managerialness and the currentness occurs. sent10: the fact that the bicameralness does not occur hold. sent11: if the pigmenting waxwork happens then that the reflectorizing roughness and the pigmenting cauliflower occurs is not correct. sent12: the reflectorizing amethyst happens. sent13: that the pigmenting flowage happens and the reflectorizing Jewry does not occur is not true if the fact that the visibleness occurs hold. sent14: the ascertaining Buffalo does not occur or the reflectorizing Cedrus does not occur or both if the faucalness happens. sent15: that the non-fiscalness and the Dutchness occurs prevents that the faucalness occurs. sent16: that the biodefense does not occur hold if the staphylococcalness does not occur. sent17: the pigmenting antiestablishmentarianism and the visibleness occurs. sent18: the down and the exchanging happens. sent19: if the faucalness does not occur the ascertaining Buffalo does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the visibleness occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the pigmenting flowage happens but the reflectorizing Jewry does not occur is right is false.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the duel happens is not false.; sent18 -> int4: the downing occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the duel and the downness happens.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the reflectorizing Cedrus does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__