the entomologist is hemal.
sent1: the chordate is not a Antigone if the niblick does not clue clipboard but it is a insole. sent2: that the entomologist is not the gain if the entomologist is not a Antigone is correct. sent3: something that does not fight and does not clue clipboard is non-hemal. sent4: the chordate is a fight and it does clue clipboard. sent5: the niblick is a insole. sent6: the hydrazoite is not a kind of a fight. sent7: if the niblick clues Torreon then the mattock is not an attrition. sent8: something does clue Torreon and it is stoic if it is not a insole. sent9: if something is a Paducah then it is not non-hemal. sent10: if the fact that the chordate is a fight is not wrong the mattock does clue Torreon. sent11: the chordate clues Torreon if it does clue clipboard. sent12: if the chordate is both a fight and hemal the niblick is not an attrition. sent13: something that is not a fight is not a kind of a Antigone. sent14: the niblick is not an attrition but a insole if the fact that the mattock is a stoic is correct. sent15: the fact that the entomologist is not a kind of a gain is not incorrect. sent16: if something does fight and does not clue clipboard it is hemal. sent17: if the entomologist is a kind of an attrition and it is a gain then the niblick is not a Antigone. sent18: that the entomologist is not a stoic is true. sent19: if something is not a Antigone then it is not a gain. sent20: if the mattock is a kind of a stoic then the niblick is a kind of a insole. sent21: the niblick is not a Antigone but a insole. sent22: if the niblick is not a kind of a insole then it does not clue Torreon. sent23: the chordate clues clipboard. sent24: something is both not a gain and a Paducah if it is not a Antigone. sent25: if something clues Torreon then it is a kind of a stoic. sent26: the entomologist is not a kind of a Antigone if the niblick is not an attrition and is a insole.
sent4 -> int1: the chordate is a kind of a fight.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the mattock does clue Torreon.; sent25 -> int3: if the mattock does clue Torreon then it is a stoic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the mattock is a stoic.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the niblick is not an attrition but a insole.; int5 & sent26 -> int6: the entomologist is not a kind of a Antigone.; sent24 -> int7: the entomologist is not a gain but it is a Paducah if it is not a Antigone.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the entomologist is not a gain and is a Paducah.; int8 -> int9: the entomologist is a Paducah.; sent9 -> int10: the entomologist is hemal if it is a Paducah.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the insufflation is hemal.
sent16 -> int11: if the insufflation does fight and does not clue clipboard then it is hemal.; sent8 -> int12: if the insufflation is not a insole then it clues Torreon and is not non-stoic.;
$hypothesis$ = the entomologist is hemal. ; $context$ = sent1: the chordate is not a Antigone if the niblick does not clue clipboard but it is a insole. sent2: that the entomologist is not the gain if the entomologist is not a Antigone is correct. sent3: something that does not fight and does not clue clipboard is non-hemal. sent4: the chordate is a fight and it does clue clipboard. sent5: the niblick is a insole. sent6: the hydrazoite is not a kind of a fight. sent7: if the niblick clues Torreon then the mattock is not an attrition. sent8: something does clue Torreon and it is stoic if it is not a insole. sent9: if something is a Paducah then it is not non-hemal. sent10: if the fact that the chordate is a fight is not wrong the mattock does clue Torreon. sent11: the chordate clues Torreon if it does clue clipboard. sent12: if the chordate is both a fight and hemal the niblick is not an attrition. sent13: something that is not a fight is not a kind of a Antigone. sent14: the niblick is not an attrition but a insole if the fact that the mattock is a stoic is correct. sent15: the fact that the entomologist is not a kind of a gain is not incorrect. sent16: if something does fight and does not clue clipboard it is hemal. sent17: if the entomologist is a kind of an attrition and it is a gain then the niblick is not a Antigone. sent18: that the entomologist is not a stoic is true. sent19: if something is not a Antigone then it is not a gain. sent20: if the mattock is a kind of a stoic then the niblick is a kind of a insole. sent21: the niblick is not a Antigone but a insole. sent22: if the niblick is not a kind of a insole then it does not clue Torreon. sent23: the chordate clues clipboard. sent24: something is both not a gain and a Paducah if it is not a Antigone. sent25: if something clues Torreon then it is a kind of a stoic. sent26: the entomologist is not a kind of a Antigone if the niblick is not an attrition and is a insole. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the chordate is a kind of a fight.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the mattock does clue Torreon.; sent25 -> int3: if the mattock does clue Torreon then it is a stoic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the mattock is a stoic.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the niblick is not an attrition but a insole.; int5 & sent26 -> int6: the entomologist is not a kind of a Antigone.; sent24 -> int7: the entomologist is not a gain but it is a Paducah if it is not a Antigone.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the entomologist is not a gain and is a Paducah.; int8 -> int9: the entomologist is a Paducah.; sent9 -> int10: the entomologist is hemal if it is a Paducah.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__