that the console is a Daucus and presides if the winceyette does not exhilarate give is not correct.
sent1: if the winceyette does not exhilarate give the stopcock is not a Mohammedan and does not segregate exultation. sent2: the console presides if the stopcock is not a Mohammedan and does not segregate exultation. sent3: the winceyette does not exhilarate give and it is not a Daucus. sent4: the console is a kind of a OIG and/or is not microbial. sent5: if the console is a OIG or it is not microbial or both it is a OIG. sent6: if the winceyette exhilarates give the console is a Daucus and does preside. sent7: the stopcock does not segregate exultation if the winceyette does not exhilarate give. sent8: a OIG is a Daucus. sent9: if the winceyette exhilarates give then the stopcock is not a Mohammedan and it does not segregate exultation. sent10: if the stopcock is not a Mohammedan but it does segregate exultation that the console presides is not wrong. sent11: the stopcock does not segregate exultation. sent12: that the biweekly is microbial is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the winceyette does not exhilarate give.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the stopcock is not a Mohammedan and it does not segregate exultation.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the console presides.; sent8 -> int3: the console is a kind of a Daucus if it is a kind of a OIG.; sent5 & sent4 -> int4: the console is a kind of a OIG.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the console is a Daucus.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the console is a Daucus and it presides is true.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the console is a Daucus and presides if the winceyette does not exhilarate give is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the winceyette does not exhilarate give the stopcock is not a Mohammedan and does not segregate exultation. sent2: the console presides if the stopcock is not a Mohammedan and does not segregate exultation. sent3: the winceyette does not exhilarate give and it is not a Daucus. sent4: the console is a kind of a OIG and/or is not microbial. sent5: if the console is a OIG or it is not microbial or both it is a OIG. sent6: if the winceyette exhilarates give the console is a Daucus and does preside. sent7: the stopcock does not segregate exultation if the winceyette does not exhilarate give. sent8: a OIG is a Daucus. sent9: if the winceyette exhilarates give then the stopcock is not a Mohammedan and it does not segregate exultation. sent10: if the stopcock is not a Mohammedan but it does segregate exultation that the console presides is not wrong. sent11: the stopcock does not segregate exultation. sent12: that the biweekly is microbial is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the winceyette does not exhilarate give.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the stopcock is not a Mohammedan and it does not segregate exultation.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the console presides.; sent8 -> int3: the console is a kind of a Daucus if it is a kind of a OIG.; sent5 & sent4 -> int4: the console is a kind of a OIG.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the console is a Daucus.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the console is a Daucus and it presides is true.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__