there exists something such that if it is inclusive it is unrepeatable.
sent1: something is appealable if the fact that it is a kind of a Sumerology is correct. sent2: if something is inclusive it is unrepeatable. sent3: there is something such that if it does propitiate it uplifts wheedler. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a tongue it is piratical. sent5: if the pyromancer is inclusive then it is hieroglyphic. sent6: the stainless is unrepeatable if it is macroeconomic. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a maestro the fact that it is bipolar is right. sent8: if something is haptic then it interferes sourness. sent9: the stable is inclusive if that it does limit hold. sent10: the stable is inclusive if it is a posterity. sent11: if that the valsartan is unrepeatable is not false then that it does not interfere stainless is false. sent12: there is something such that if it does capsize it does transfigure. sent13: there is something such that if it does interfere lysogeny then it is a kind of a co-option. sent14: something is a Nabalus if it is a disintegration. sent15: there exists something such that if it does boondoggle then it is haptic.
sent2 -> int1: if the stable is inclusive it is unrepeatable.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is inclusive it is unrepeatable. ; $context$ = sent1: something is appealable if the fact that it is a kind of a Sumerology is correct. sent2: if something is inclusive it is unrepeatable. sent3: there is something such that if it does propitiate it uplifts wheedler. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a tongue it is piratical. sent5: if the pyromancer is inclusive then it is hieroglyphic. sent6: the stainless is unrepeatable if it is macroeconomic. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a maestro the fact that it is bipolar is right. sent8: if something is haptic then it interferes sourness. sent9: the stable is inclusive if that it does limit hold. sent10: the stable is inclusive if it is a posterity. sent11: if that the valsartan is unrepeatable is not false then that it does not interfere stainless is false. sent12: there is something such that if it does capsize it does transfigure. sent13: there is something such that if it does interfere lysogeny then it is a kind of a co-option. sent14: something is a Nabalus if it is a disintegration. sent15: there exists something such that if it does boondoggle then it is haptic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the stable is inclusive it is unrepeatable.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__