the fact that the roller-skater does tin is not wrong.
sent1: the decoration is merciless if it does mortice MAK. sent2: the fact that if the fact that the bufflehead is a kind of a munj and is a volition is false then the Turkmen is not a kind of a canonist is not false. sent3: if the decoration is a canonist then it mortices MAK. sent4: that something is a munj and it is a volition is false if that it is not a sciolism is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that it mortices MAK. sent6: the bufflehead is not a kind of a sciolism and it does not mortice Pereskia if there exists something such that it mortices MAK. sent7: the bleachers is canonist and forecasts decoration if the Turkmen is not canonist. sent8: if the bleachers forecasts decoration the roller-skater is a tinning.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the bufflehead is not a sciolism and it does not mortice Pereskia.; int1 -> int2: the bufflehead is not a kind of a sciolism.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the bufflehead is a kind of a munj that is a volition is not right if it is not a kind of a sciolism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the bufflehead is a kind of a munj and it is a volition is wrong.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the Turkmen is not a kind of a canonist is not incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the bleachers is a kind of a canonist and it forecasts decoration.; int6 -> int7: the bleachers forecasts decoration.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the decoration is merciless and it is a kind of a sciolism.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the roller-skater does tin is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the decoration is merciless if it does mortice MAK. sent2: the fact that if the fact that the bufflehead is a kind of a munj and is a volition is false then the Turkmen is not a kind of a canonist is not false. sent3: if the decoration is a canonist then it mortices MAK. sent4: that something is a munj and it is a volition is false if that it is not a sciolism is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that it mortices MAK. sent6: the bufflehead is not a kind of a sciolism and it does not mortice Pereskia if there exists something such that it mortices MAK. sent7: the bleachers is canonist and forecasts decoration if the Turkmen is not canonist. sent8: if the bleachers forecasts decoration the roller-skater is a tinning. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the bufflehead is not a sciolism and it does not mortice Pereskia.; int1 -> int2: the bufflehead is not a kind of a sciolism.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the bufflehead is a kind of a munj that is a volition is not right if it is not a kind of a sciolism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the bufflehead is a kind of a munj and it is a volition is wrong.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the Turkmen is not a kind of a canonist is not incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the bleachers is a kind of a canonist and it forecasts decoration.; int6 -> int7: the bleachers forecasts decoration.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__