that the mercenary is gallinaceous thing that does not narrate Livonian is not right.
sent1: if the fact that the sundowner is not abolitionary and it does not narrate Livonian is wrong then it is not a clothesbrush. sent2: the fact that something is not omnidirectional but it is a kind of a side is false if it is abolitionary. sent3: if the Brother is omnidirectional the fact that the mercenary is gallinaceous and it does narrate Livonian is false. sent4: the fantast bristles and it is a kind of a terreplein. sent5: the mercenary is not omnidirectional. sent6: the fact that the fact that the sundowner is abolitionary but not side is not incorrect is not correct. sent7: the Brother is not gallinaceous. sent8: the sundowner is a kind of a moroseness if the fact that the dorsum is not homocercal but it does subject Adad is wrong. sent9: that the sundowner is not abolitionary and it is not a kind of a side is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the Brother is omnidirectional is not false that the mercenary is a kind of gallinaceous thing that does not narrate Livonian is not correct. sent11: the sundowner is both not non-omnidirectional and not non-gallinaceous if the Brother is not a kind of a side. sent12: the sundowner is a kind of a Plectognathi if the fact that the Brother is not omnidirectional is correct. sent13: the Brother is abolitionary if the sundowner is diclinous but it is not abolitionary. sent14: the fact that the sundowner does not narrate Livonian and is not a clothesbrush is false. sent15: if the fact that the sundowner is not gallinaceous and it is not side is incorrect then the fact that it is not abolitionary is not false. sent16: the bullhead is not gallinaceous if that it is not a psychobabble and is not a kind of a sirdar does not hold. sent17: the fact that something is not homocercal but it does subject Adad is false if it deprives monosemy. sent18: if the Brother is not omnidirectional the sundowner is a clothesbrush and it is a Plectognathi. sent19: the fact that the mercenary is gallinaceous and it does narrate Livonian is wrong. sent20: the sundowner is a kind of a Plectognathi. sent21: the mercenary is not omnidirectional if the fact that the Brother is not omnidirectional but it is a side is wrong. sent22: the sundowner is not a kind of a clothesbrush if it is abolitionary. sent23: if something is a kind of a moroseness it is diclinous and it is not abolitionary. sent24: if the fact that the sundowner is not abolitionary and it is not a side does not hold that it is not a clothesbrush hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Brother is not omnidirectional.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the sundowner is a clothesbrush and it is a Plectognathi.; int1 -> int2: the sundowner is a clothesbrush.; sent24 & sent9 -> int3: that the sundowner is not a kind of a clothesbrush hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Brother is omnidirectional.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the mercenary is gallinaceous and does not narrate Livonian.
sent2 -> int6: if the Brother is abolitionary then the fact that it is both not omnidirectional and side is false.; sent23 -> int7: the sundowner is diclinous and not abolitionary if it is a kind of a moroseness.; sent17 -> int8: if the dorsum deprives monosemy then that it is not homocercal and it does subject Adad is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the mercenary is gallinaceous thing that does not narrate Livonian is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the sundowner is not abolitionary and it does not narrate Livonian is wrong then it is not a clothesbrush. sent2: the fact that something is not omnidirectional but it is a kind of a side is false if it is abolitionary. sent3: if the Brother is omnidirectional the fact that the mercenary is gallinaceous and it does narrate Livonian is false. sent4: the fantast bristles and it is a kind of a terreplein. sent5: the mercenary is not omnidirectional. sent6: the fact that the fact that the sundowner is abolitionary but not side is not incorrect is not correct. sent7: the Brother is not gallinaceous. sent8: the sundowner is a kind of a moroseness if the fact that the dorsum is not homocercal but it does subject Adad is wrong. sent9: that the sundowner is not abolitionary and it is not a kind of a side is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the Brother is omnidirectional is not false that the mercenary is a kind of gallinaceous thing that does not narrate Livonian is not correct. sent11: the sundowner is both not non-omnidirectional and not non-gallinaceous if the Brother is not a kind of a side. sent12: the sundowner is a kind of a Plectognathi if the fact that the Brother is not omnidirectional is correct. sent13: the Brother is abolitionary if the sundowner is diclinous but it is not abolitionary. sent14: the fact that the sundowner does not narrate Livonian and is not a clothesbrush is false. sent15: if the fact that the sundowner is not gallinaceous and it is not side is incorrect then the fact that it is not abolitionary is not false. sent16: the bullhead is not gallinaceous if that it is not a psychobabble and is not a kind of a sirdar does not hold. sent17: the fact that something is not homocercal but it does subject Adad is false if it deprives monosemy. sent18: if the Brother is not omnidirectional the sundowner is a clothesbrush and it is a Plectognathi. sent19: the fact that the mercenary is gallinaceous and it does narrate Livonian is wrong. sent20: the sundowner is a kind of a Plectognathi. sent21: the mercenary is not omnidirectional if the fact that the Brother is not omnidirectional but it is a side is wrong. sent22: the sundowner is not a kind of a clothesbrush if it is abolitionary. sent23: if something is a kind of a moroseness it is diclinous and it is not abolitionary. sent24: if the fact that the sundowner is not abolitionary and it is not a side does not hold that it is not a clothesbrush hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Brother is not omnidirectional.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the sundowner is a clothesbrush and it is a Plectognathi.; int1 -> int2: the sundowner is a clothesbrush.; sent24 & sent9 -> int3: that the sundowner is not a kind of a clothesbrush hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Brother is omnidirectional.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__