the instrumentality is a providence if the proturan is a kind of a ichneumon.
sent1: the proturan flattens selector. sent2: if the proturan does not turf piper then it does not flatten endothelium and it is not a kind of a Thymus. sent3: if the holometabolism is not a ichneumon that it does turf piper and it is a kind of a providence is right. sent4: the instrumentality does not turf piper. sent5: the fact that the bubo does not flatten selector is correct. sent6: if something is not a ichneumon the proturan does turf piper and it is a kind of a Thymus. sent7: the proturan is not a rotogravure. sent8: the aster is not soluble. sent9: if the calabash does not case baffle it does not flatten endothelium. sent10: the instrumentality is a kind of a rotogravure and it is a providence if the fact that something is not a kind of a portal is correct. sent11: the proturan is both a ichneumon and a providence. sent12: the bubo does turf piper if there exists something such that it is not impressionistic. sent13: the dacite does not turf piper. sent14: the fact that the bubo does not turf marketing is correct. sent15: that the proturan does not turf piper is not incorrect. sent16: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a ichneumon then the proturan is a kind of a rotogravure. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a ichneumon. sent18: the proturan does not flatten endothelium but it is a portal. sent19: if the bubo is a rotogravure then the instrumentality is a providence. sent20: the instrumentality is not experimental but it divaricates earache. sent21: the bubo is not a portal if the proturan is not a Thymus but it is a kind of a ichneumon. sent22: something flattens endothelium. sent23: That the piper does not turf proturan is not incorrect. sent24: there is something such that it is not a kind of a pfennig. sent25: that the bubo is a Thymus hold.
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the proturan does not flatten endothelium and is not a Thymus.; int1 -> int2: the proturan is not a Thymus.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the proturan is a kind of a ichneumon.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the proturan is not a kind of a Thymus but it is a kind of a ichneumon.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the bubo is not a portal.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a portal is right.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the instrumentality is a rotogravure and it is a providence.; int6 -> int7: the instrumentality is a providence.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the holometabolism is a providence hold.
$hypothesis$ = the instrumentality is a providence if the proturan is a kind of a ichneumon. ; $context$ = sent1: the proturan flattens selector. sent2: if the proturan does not turf piper then it does not flatten endothelium and it is not a kind of a Thymus. sent3: if the holometabolism is not a ichneumon that it does turf piper and it is a kind of a providence is right. sent4: the instrumentality does not turf piper. sent5: the fact that the bubo does not flatten selector is correct. sent6: if something is not a ichneumon the proturan does turf piper and it is a kind of a Thymus. sent7: the proturan is not a rotogravure. sent8: the aster is not soluble. sent9: if the calabash does not case baffle it does not flatten endothelium. sent10: the instrumentality is a kind of a rotogravure and it is a providence if the fact that something is not a kind of a portal is correct. sent11: the proturan is both a ichneumon and a providence. sent12: the bubo does turf piper if there exists something such that it is not impressionistic. sent13: the dacite does not turf piper. sent14: the fact that the bubo does not turf marketing is correct. sent15: that the proturan does not turf piper is not incorrect. sent16: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a ichneumon then the proturan is a kind of a rotogravure. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a ichneumon. sent18: the proturan does not flatten endothelium but it is a portal. sent19: if the bubo is a rotogravure then the instrumentality is a providence. sent20: the instrumentality is not experimental but it divaricates earache. sent21: the bubo is not a portal if the proturan is not a Thymus but it is a kind of a ichneumon. sent22: something flattens endothelium. sent23: That the piper does not turf proturan is not incorrect. sent24: there is something such that it is not a kind of a pfennig. sent25: that the bubo is a Thymus hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the proturan does not flatten endothelium and is not a Thymus.; int1 -> int2: the proturan is not a Thymus.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the proturan is a kind of a ichneumon.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the proturan is not a kind of a Thymus but it is a kind of a ichneumon.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the bubo is not a portal.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a portal is right.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the instrumentality is a rotogravure and it is a providence.; int6 -> int7: the instrumentality is a providence.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__