the fact that that the shivering ultracentrifuge does not occur is brought about by that the esophagealness does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the postdoctoral happens but the protruding does not occur. sent2: the protectorship occurs. sent3: the fact that the shivering lizard's-tail does not occur is not false. sent4: the Rhodesianness happens and the lecture occurs if the arboriculture does not occur. sent5: the arboriculture and the encore happens if the shivering lizard's-tail does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the esophagealness does not occur is correct the shivering ultracentrifuge happens. sent7: that the comforting and the encore happens is triggered by that the activating asynchronism does not occur. sent8: that the shivering ultracentrifuge does not occur is correct if the lecturing and the arboriculture occurs. sent9: not the excusing Capricorn but the phase occurs. sent10: that not the excusing Capricorn but the phase occurs prevents the activating asynchronism. sent11: if the sugariness does not occur the acceptableness occurs. sent12: the esophagealness happens but the swattering does not occur if that the lecturing does not occur is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lecture does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the esophagealness but not the swattering occurs.; int1 -> int2: the esophagealness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the esophagealness does not occur.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lecture occurs.; sent5 & sent3 -> int5: the arboriculture occurs and the encore happens.; int5 -> int6: the arboriculture occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the lecture and the arboriculture happens.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the shivering ultracentrifuge does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
both the comforts and the Rhodesianness happens.
sent10 & sent9 -> int9: the activating asynchronism does not occur.; sent7 & int9 -> int10: the comforting and the encore happens.; int10 -> int11: the comforting occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the shivering ultracentrifuge does not occur is brought about by that the esophagealness does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the postdoctoral happens but the protruding does not occur. sent2: the protectorship occurs. sent3: the fact that the shivering lizard's-tail does not occur is not false. sent4: the Rhodesianness happens and the lecture occurs if the arboriculture does not occur. sent5: the arboriculture and the encore happens if the shivering lizard's-tail does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the esophagealness does not occur is correct the shivering ultracentrifuge happens. sent7: that the comforting and the encore happens is triggered by that the activating asynchronism does not occur. sent8: that the shivering ultracentrifuge does not occur is correct if the lecturing and the arboriculture occurs. sent9: not the excusing Capricorn but the phase occurs. sent10: that not the excusing Capricorn but the phase occurs prevents the activating asynchronism. sent11: if the sugariness does not occur the acceptableness occurs. sent12: the esophagealness happens but the swattering does not occur if that the lecturing does not occur is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lecture does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the esophagealness but not the swattering occurs.; int1 -> int2: the esophagealness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the esophagealness does not occur.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the lecture occurs.; sent5 & sent3 -> int5: the arboriculture occurs and the encore happens.; int5 -> int6: the arboriculture occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the lecture and the arboriculture happens.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the shivering ultracentrifuge does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__