the bow-wow is not a u-turn and is non-Jacksonian.
sent1: if something is not a kind of an italic that the fact that the towpath is not millennial or not porcine or both is not true hold. sent2: if the dinocerate does not hum then the fact that the towpath is not a single-leaf but it does smatter is not right. sent3: the dinocerate is not a kind of a crossheading if that the towpath is not millennial or not porcine or both does not hold. sent4: something is not distrustful if that it is not a crossheading is correct. sent5: the dinocerate is not a hum. sent6: if the fact that the towpath is not a single-leaf but it smatters is wrong the pesthole is not a eschar. sent7: if that the pesthole is a eschar does not hold that the bow-wow is both not a u-turn and not Jacksonian is false. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an antagonist is true. sent9: something that is not a hum is not a u-turn and not a Jacksonian. sent10: the deist is not cruciferous if the fact that that it is a kind of non-scorbutic thing that waxes is correct is not correct. sent11: the sailor's-choice does not imply dinocerate if the deist is not cruciferous. sent12: the fact that something is both not a Seanad and a eschar is not correct if it is not distrustful. sent13: if there exists something such that it is an antagonist then that the deist is both not scorbutic and a wax is wrong. sent14: if the sailor's-choice does not imply dinocerate the fact that the etanercept is a diet and/or it is not an italic does not hold. sent15: the fact that the dinocerate is not a eschar and is not a kind of a hum does not hold if it is a Jacksonian. sent16: the pesthole is not an italic if the fact that either the etanercept is a diet or it is not italic or both is not right.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the towpath is not a single-leaf but it does smatter is wrong.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: that the pesthole is not a eschar hold.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the bow-wow does not smatter.
$hypothesis$ = the bow-wow is not a u-turn and is non-Jacksonian. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of an italic that the fact that the towpath is not millennial or not porcine or both is not true hold. sent2: if the dinocerate does not hum then the fact that the towpath is not a single-leaf but it does smatter is not right. sent3: the dinocerate is not a kind of a crossheading if that the towpath is not millennial or not porcine or both does not hold. sent4: something is not distrustful if that it is not a crossheading is correct. sent5: the dinocerate is not a hum. sent6: if the fact that the towpath is not a single-leaf but it smatters is wrong the pesthole is not a eschar. sent7: if that the pesthole is a eschar does not hold that the bow-wow is both not a u-turn and not Jacksonian is false. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an antagonist is true. sent9: something that is not a hum is not a u-turn and not a Jacksonian. sent10: the deist is not cruciferous if the fact that that it is a kind of non-scorbutic thing that waxes is correct is not correct. sent11: the sailor's-choice does not imply dinocerate if the deist is not cruciferous. sent12: the fact that something is both not a Seanad and a eschar is not correct if it is not distrustful. sent13: if there exists something such that it is an antagonist then that the deist is both not scorbutic and a wax is wrong. sent14: if the sailor's-choice does not imply dinocerate the fact that the etanercept is a diet and/or it is not an italic does not hold. sent15: the fact that the dinocerate is not a eschar and is not a kind of a hum does not hold if it is a Jacksonian. sent16: the pesthole is not an italic if the fact that either the etanercept is a diet or it is not italic or both is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the towpath is not a single-leaf but it does smatter is wrong.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: that the pesthole is not a eschar hold.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__