the straightness does not depose.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the straightness does convoy part-timer and is a poppet does not hold is not false if that it is not a cataleptic is true. sent2: the straightness is a kind of non-competent thing that does not convoy part-timer if the fact that it deposes is not wrong. sent3: if the fore-and-after is not archesporial then the fact that it is not a poppet and it is cataleptic does not hold. sent4: something does not frequent if it is not competent and it does not convoy part-timer. sent5: if the fore-and-after does convoy Houston that it is not a poppet and it is not frequent is not right. sent6: the armhole is a sensation but it is not stainable. sent7: the fore-and-after convoys Houston if the straightness convoys Houston. sent8: the straightness does not convoy part-timer. sent9: the fore-and-after is not archesporial. sent10: the straightness is archesporial and not frequent if the fore-and-after is not competent. sent11: the fact that the straightness convoys kanamycin is not incorrect. sent12: the desertification does convoy part-timer. sent13: the straightness is archesporial and it does convoy Houston if the armhole is not a cataleptic. sent14: if the straightness is not frequent the armhole does convoy Houston and is not a kind of a poppet. sent15: that something is both not a thalamus and uninucleate is correct. sent16: the foster-sister does not depose. sent17: the fact that something is archesporial but it is not a kind of a cataleptic does not hold if it does mow. sent18: there exists something such that that it is a poppet that is a cataleptic does not hold. sent19: the armhole is a poppet if there exists something such that it is a poppet. sent20: the fact that the straightness does not convoy part-timer is right if it does depose. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is not spicate and it is a Guatemalan is not correct. sent22: if something is non-cataleptic and it does not depose then it does not convoy Houston. sent23: that the armhole is a poppet is not false if there is something such that that it is not a poppet and it is a cataleptic is not right. sent24: something is not a poppet and frequents if it does convoy Houston.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the straightness does depose.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the straightness is not competent and does not convoy part-timer.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the straightness is not frequent if the straightness is incompetent thing that does not convoy part-timer is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the straightness is not frequent.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the armhole convoys Houston and is not a poppet.; int4 -> int5: the armhole is not a poppet.; sent3 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the fore-and-after is not a poppet but a cataleptic is incorrect.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is both not a poppet and a cataleptic does not hold.; int7 & sent23 -> int8: the armhole is a kind of a poppet.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fore-and-after does not depose.
sent17 -> int10: if the armhole mows the fact that it is archesporial and it is not a cataleptic is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the straightness does not depose. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the straightness does convoy part-timer and is a poppet does not hold is not false if that it is not a cataleptic is true. sent2: the straightness is a kind of non-competent thing that does not convoy part-timer if the fact that it deposes is not wrong. sent3: if the fore-and-after is not archesporial then the fact that it is not a poppet and it is cataleptic does not hold. sent4: something does not frequent if it is not competent and it does not convoy part-timer. sent5: if the fore-and-after does convoy Houston that it is not a poppet and it is not frequent is not right. sent6: the armhole is a sensation but it is not stainable. sent7: the fore-and-after convoys Houston if the straightness convoys Houston. sent8: the straightness does not convoy part-timer. sent9: the fore-and-after is not archesporial. sent10: the straightness is archesporial and not frequent if the fore-and-after is not competent. sent11: the fact that the straightness convoys kanamycin is not incorrect. sent12: the desertification does convoy part-timer. sent13: the straightness is archesporial and it does convoy Houston if the armhole is not a cataleptic. sent14: if the straightness is not frequent the armhole does convoy Houston and is not a kind of a poppet. sent15: that something is both not a thalamus and uninucleate is correct. sent16: the foster-sister does not depose. sent17: the fact that something is archesporial but it is not a kind of a cataleptic does not hold if it does mow. sent18: there exists something such that that it is a poppet that is a cataleptic does not hold. sent19: the armhole is a poppet if there exists something such that it is a poppet. sent20: the fact that the straightness does not convoy part-timer is right if it does depose. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is not spicate and it is a Guatemalan is not correct. sent22: if something is non-cataleptic and it does not depose then it does not convoy Houston. sent23: that the armhole is a poppet is not false if there is something such that that it is not a poppet and it is a cataleptic is not right. sent24: something is not a poppet and frequents if it does convoy Houston. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the straightness does depose.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the straightness is not competent and does not convoy part-timer.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the straightness is not frequent if the straightness is incompetent thing that does not convoy part-timer is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the straightness is not frequent.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the armhole convoys Houston and is not a poppet.; int4 -> int5: the armhole is not a poppet.; sent3 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the fore-and-after is not a poppet but a cataleptic is incorrect.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is both not a poppet and a cataleptic does not hold.; int7 & sent23 -> int8: the armhole is a kind of a poppet.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__