that the fact that the match is fenestral but it is not fitting is true is not true.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not firebomb Aborigine and does not firebomb saltcellar the pome does not bone gawkiness. sent2: the match is not a fitting if the credenza is a kind of a stagflation. sent3: if that the credenza is a stagflation is not wrong that the match fits is true. sent4: if the schoolteacher does not firebomb Erlang but it does bone patisserie the mid-calf does behave. sent5: something either behaves or is a kind of a stagflation or both if it is not translational. sent6: if something is a like then the fact that it is fenestral and it is not a fitting is wrong. sent7: if the Christmasberry is fenestral then the match is fenestral. sent8: if the credenza is a like the match is not a kind of a fitting. sent9: the credenza is a stagflation or it is a kind of a like or both if the pome is not a like. sent10: the Christmasberry is fenestral. sent11: if the bollworm behaves the mid-calf does not behaves. sent12: the fact that that the mid-calf is a kind of an awe that is translational is false if the pome does not bone gawkiness hold. sent13: the pome is not a like if there is something such that the fact that it does not firebomb Erlang and does bone patisserie does not hold. sent14: if there is something such that it firebombs Erlang the pome does not like. sent15: if the schoolteacher does firebomb Erlang and it does bone patisserie then the mid-calf behaves. sent16: that the credenza is a lamentation hold. sent17: if the fact that the credenza is a lamentation is right it does not firebomb Aborigine and it does not firebomb saltcellar. sent18: the bollworm does behave.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schoolteacher does not firebomb Erlang and does bone patisserie.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the mid-calf does behave.; sent11 & sent18 -> int2: the mid-calf does not behave.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the schoolteacher does not firebomb Erlang but it does bone patisserie is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it does not firebomb Erlang and does bone patisserie is false.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the pome is not a like.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: either the credenza is a stagflation or it is a like or both.; int7 & sent2 & sent8 -> int8: the match is not fitting.; sent7 & sent10 -> int9: the match is fenestral.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that that the match is fenestral but it does not fit is not incorrect does not hold.
sent6 -> int10: if the match does like then that that it is a kind of fenestral thing that is non-fitting is correct does not hold.; sent5 -> int11: the schoolteacher behaves and/or it is a stagflation if it is not translational.; sent17 & sent16 -> int12: the credenza does not firebomb Aborigine and does not firebomb saltcellar.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does not firebomb Aborigine and does not firebomb saltcellar.; int13 & sent1 -> int14: the fact that the pome does not bone gawkiness is not incorrect.; sent12 & int14 -> int15: that the fact that that the mid-calf is a kind of an awe that is translational is not false is wrong is not false.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that that it awes and it is not nontranslational does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the match is fenestral but it is not fitting is true is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not firebomb Aborigine and does not firebomb saltcellar the pome does not bone gawkiness. sent2: the match is not a fitting if the credenza is a kind of a stagflation. sent3: if that the credenza is a stagflation is not wrong that the match fits is true. sent4: if the schoolteacher does not firebomb Erlang but it does bone patisserie the mid-calf does behave. sent5: something either behaves or is a kind of a stagflation or both if it is not translational. sent6: if something is a like then the fact that it is fenestral and it is not a fitting is wrong. sent7: if the Christmasberry is fenestral then the match is fenestral. sent8: if the credenza is a like the match is not a kind of a fitting. sent9: the credenza is a stagflation or it is a kind of a like or both if the pome is not a like. sent10: the Christmasberry is fenestral. sent11: if the bollworm behaves the mid-calf does not behaves. sent12: the fact that that the mid-calf is a kind of an awe that is translational is false if the pome does not bone gawkiness hold. sent13: the pome is not a like if there is something such that the fact that it does not firebomb Erlang and does bone patisserie does not hold. sent14: if there is something such that it firebombs Erlang the pome does not like. sent15: if the schoolteacher does firebomb Erlang and it does bone patisserie then the mid-calf behaves. sent16: that the credenza is a lamentation hold. sent17: if the fact that the credenza is a lamentation is right it does not firebomb Aborigine and it does not firebomb saltcellar. sent18: the bollworm does behave. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schoolteacher does not firebomb Erlang and does bone patisserie.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the mid-calf does behave.; sent11 & sent18 -> int2: the mid-calf does not behave.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the schoolteacher does not firebomb Erlang but it does bone patisserie is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it does not firebomb Erlang and does bone patisserie is false.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the pome is not a like.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: either the credenza is a stagflation or it is a like or both.; int7 & sent2 & sent8 -> int8: the match is not fitting.; sent7 & sent10 -> int9: the match is fenestral.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__