the Bercy is not a Lincolnshire if the fact that the schizogony does not mint Hadrian is not wrong.
sent1: the Bercy is not synonymous. sent2: if the fact that the schizogony is not adrenergic but it is synonymous is not correct then the Bercy is not a Lincolnshire. sent3: if something does not mint Hadrian the fact that it is not a adrenergic and is synonymous is incorrect. sent4: the schizogony does not mint Hadrian if that the Bercy is not a kind of a Lincolnshire and is a adrenergic does not hold.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the schizogony is not a adrenergic and is not non-synonymous is not correct if that it does not mint Hadrian is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schizogony does not mint Hadrian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the schizogony is both non-adrenergic and not non-synonymous is incorrect.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the Bercy is not a kind of a Lincolnshire.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Bercy is not a Lincolnshire if the fact that the schizogony does not mint Hadrian is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Bercy is not synonymous. sent2: if the fact that the schizogony is not adrenergic but it is synonymous is not correct then the Bercy is not a Lincolnshire. sent3: if something does not mint Hadrian the fact that it is not a adrenergic and is synonymous is incorrect. sent4: the schizogony does not mint Hadrian if that the Bercy is not a kind of a Lincolnshire and is a adrenergic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the schizogony is not a adrenergic and is not non-synonymous is not correct if that it does not mint Hadrian is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schizogony does not mint Hadrian.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the schizogony is both non-adrenergic and not non-synonymous is incorrect.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the Bercy is not a kind of a Lincolnshire.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__