the quellung does not instrument Gospel.
sent1: the baboon does integrate cleaning and it is voyeuristic. sent2: if the pediculicide is not voyeuristic it does mystify pediculicide and checks. sent3: the quellung is voyeuristic and it is philosophic if the pediculicide does not scarf. sent4: if the fact that the baboon is a breakthrough is not incorrect the pediculicide does scarf. sent5: something does mystify Hillary and is a cofactor. sent6: something is philosophic if it does check. sent7: if something is not a breakthrough then that that it is not veterinary and it is radio hold is not true. sent8: the star is a scarf if it is not veterinary. sent9: the baboon is a breakthrough if the star is a radio. sent10: everything is not a beats and is a Nyala. sent11: the fact that the riptide does check is correct if the pediculicide does beat. sent12: if the riptide is not a beats then the star is both veterinary and radio. sent13: the baboon is unforgettable and it is a lateralization. sent14: the quellung does not instrument Gospel if there exists something such that it is a scarf and is philosophic.
sent10 -> int1: the riptide is not a kind of a beats but it is a Nyala.; int1 -> int2: the riptide does not beat.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the star is veterinary and is radio.; int3 -> int4: the star radios.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the baboon is a breakthrough.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the pediculicide is a kind of a scarf.; sent6 -> int7: if the pediculicide is a check then it is philosophic.;
the quellung instruments Gospel.
sent7 -> int8: the fact that the star is non-veterinary and not non-radio does not hold if it is not a kind of a breakthrough.;
$hypothesis$ = the quellung does not instrument Gospel. ; $context$ = sent1: the baboon does integrate cleaning and it is voyeuristic. sent2: if the pediculicide is not voyeuristic it does mystify pediculicide and checks. sent3: the quellung is voyeuristic and it is philosophic if the pediculicide does not scarf. sent4: if the fact that the baboon is a breakthrough is not incorrect the pediculicide does scarf. sent5: something does mystify Hillary and is a cofactor. sent6: something is philosophic if it does check. sent7: if something is not a breakthrough then that that it is not veterinary and it is radio hold is not true. sent8: the star is a scarf if it is not veterinary. sent9: the baboon is a breakthrough if the star is a radio. sent10: everything is not a beats and is a Nyala. sent11: the fact that the riptide does check is correct if the pediculicide does beat. sent12: if the riptide is not a beats then the star is both veterinary and radio. sent13: the baboon is unforgettable and it is a lateralization. sent14: the quellung does not instrument Gospel if there exists something such that it is a scarf and is philosophic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the riptide is not a kind of a beats but it is a Nyala.; int1 -> int2: the riptide does not beat.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the star is veterinary and is radio.; int3 -> int4: the star radios.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the baboon is a breakthrough.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the pediculicide is a kind of a scarf.; sent6 -> int7: if the pediculicide is a check then it is philosophic.; __UNKNOWN__