the ornithologicalness does not occur if the vitreousness does not occur.
sent1: if the resulting headgear happens the sentencing does not occur. sent2: that not the offensiveness but the eremiticness happens does not hold. sent3: if that both the non-ornithologicalness and the non-vitreousness occurs is false the usurpation does not occur. sent4: if the sentence does not occur then the fact that both the non-ornithologicalness and the non-vitreousness happens is incorrect. sent5: that the resulting headgear does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the resulting headgear does not occur and the waking hypertext does not occur is not correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the vitreousness does not occur is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ornithologicalness occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the non-vitreousness and the ornithologicalness occurs.;
the fact that the usurpation does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = the ornithologicalness does not occur if the vitreousness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the resulting headgear happens the sentencing does not occur. sent2: that not the offensiveness but the eremiticness happens does not hold. sent3: if that both the non-ornithologicalness and the non-vitreousness occurs is false the usurpation does not occur. sent4: if the sentence does not occur then the fact that both the non-ornithologicalness and the non-vitreousness happens is incorrect. sent5: that the resulting headgear does not occur is incorrect if the fact that the resulting headgear does not occur and the waking hypertext does not occur is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the vitreousness does not occur is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ornithologicalness occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the non-vitreousness and the ornithologicalness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__