the Canella-alba is not kinesthetic.
sent1: the Canella-alba is not a tocainide and presides. sent2: the access is a Ashkenazi and is non-Latin if the esplanade does dissociate. sent3: something is a kind of wifely thing that is a fork if the fact that it is not a xanthophyll is not incorrect. sent4: the Canella-alba does dissociate. sent5: something that is not a kind of a heliogram either is not kinesthetic or does not preside or both. sent6: if that the fact that the Canella-alba does dissociate and does fork is correct is not right then the access does not dissociate. sent7: the broom is not a Ashkenazi but anhydrous. sent8: if something that is not a kind of a Ashkenazi does dissociate it is not kinesthetic. sent9: the Canella-alba does not dissociate if the access does not dissociate. sent10: that the access is a kind of a heliogram is correct. sent11: something is not a kind of a Latin if it is a kind of a heliogram that presides. sent12: if something is a commoner and it is anticlimactic it is not a boo. sent13: something that is not kinesthetic and/or does not preside is not kinesthetic. sent14: if something does not hear sulla and is a kind of a cleaner then it is not an aviary. sent15: the Canella-alba dissociates if the access is not a Ashkenazi. sent16: if the access is a Latin and/or is not a kind of a Ashkenazi then the closure is not a heliogram. sent17: if something does not dissociate it is a Latin or it is not a Ashkenazi or both. sent18: the access is wifely. sent19: the access is Latin if it is wifely. sent20: if something does not preside it is not a Ashkenazi. sent21: the esplanade is wifely if the closer is wifely. sent22: if the access is a Ashkenazi and not Latin the Canella-alba presides. sent23: the Canella-alba is not a Ashkenazi and does dissociate if the access is not a Ashkenazi. sent24: if the fact that something is wifely hold it dissociates. sent25: the Canella-alba is a heliogram. sent26: the Canella-alba dissociates if it is wifely.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the access presides.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the access is a heliogram and presides.; sent11 -> int2: if the access is a heliogram and it does preside then it is not a Latin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the access is not a kind of a Latin.; sent19 & sent18 -> int4: the access is Latin.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the access does not preside.; sent20 -> int7: if the access does not preside then it is not a kind of a Ashkenazi.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the access is not a Ashkenazi is not incorrect.; int8 & sent23 -> int9: that the Canella-alba is not a kind of a Ashkenazi but it dissociates is right.; sent8 -> int10: if the Canella-alba is not a Ashkenazi and dissociates then it is not kinesthetic.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the Canella-alba is kinesthetic.
sent24 -> int11: the esplanade does dissociate if it is wifely.; sent3 -> int12: the fact that the closer is wifely a fork is true if it is not a xanthophyll.;
$hypothesis$ = the Canella-alba is not kinesthetic. ; $context$ = sent1: the Canella-alba is not a tocainide and presides. sent2: the access is a Ashkenazi and is non-Latin if the esplanade does dissociate. sent3: something is a kind of wifely thing that is a fork if the fact that it is not a xanthophyll is not incorrect. sent4: the Canella-alba does dissociate. sent5: something that is not a kind of a heliogram either is not kinesthetic or does not preside or both. sent6: if that the fact that the Canella-alba does dissociate and does fork is correct is not right then the access does not dissociate. sent7: the broom is not a Ashkenazi but anhydrous. sent8: if something that is not a kind of a Ashkenazi does dissociate it is not kinesthetic. sent9: the Canella-alba does not dissociate if the access does not dissociate. sent10: that the access is a kind of a heliogram is correct. sent11: something is not a kind of a Latin if it is a kind of a heliogram that presides. sent12: if something is a commoner and it is anticlimactic it is not a boo. sent13: something that is not kinesthetic and/or does not preside is not kinesthetic. sent14: if something does not hear sulla and is a kind of a cleaner then it is not an aviary. sent15: the Canella-alba dissociates if the access is not a Ashkenazi. sent16: if the access is a Latin and/or is not a kind of a Ashkenazi then the closure is not a heliogram. sent17: if something does not dissociate it is a Latin or it is not a Ashkenazi or both. sent18: the access is wifely. sent19: the access is Latin if it is wifely. sent20: if something does not preside it is not a Ashkenazi. sent21: the esplanade is wifely if the closer is wifely. sent22: if the access is a Ashkenazi and not Latin the Canella-alba presides. sent23: the Canella-alba is not a Ashkenazi and does dissociate if the access is not a Ashkenazi. sent24: if the fact that something is wifely hold it dissociates. sent25: the Canella-alba is a heliogram. sent26: the Canella-alba dissociates if it is wifely. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the access presides.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the access is a heliogram and presides.; sent11 -> int2: if the access is a heliogram and it does preside then it is not a Latin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the access is not a kind of a Latin.; sent19 & sent18 -> int4: the access is Latin.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the access does not preside.; sent20 -> int7: if the access does not preside then it is not a kind of a Ashkenazi.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the access is not a Ashkenazi is not incorrect.; int8 & sent23 -> int9: that the Canella-alba is not a kind of a Ashkenazi but it dissociates is right.; sent8 -> int10: if the Canella-alba is not a Ashkenazi and dissociates then it is not kinesthetic.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__