the fact that there is something such that if that it is longing a FTC is not right it does not brad telegrapher is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is carpellate a commemorative it is not inland. sent2: the shocker is a kind of a fanatic if the fact that it is a kind of amygdaline thing that brads retroversion does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it brads cryophobia and is synergistic it does not brad deep. sent4: if the commandant is mutafacient and simulates it is not occipital. sent5: something does not brad telegrapher if the fact that it is longing and it is a FTC is wrong. sent6: the jay is not a FTC if it is a couple and is a kind of a humming. sent7: if the fact that something is longing and it is a FTC is incorrect then it brads telegrapher. sent8: there is something such that if that it is a Dutch and it does brad guestroom is not true then it does not master night. sent9: if that the telegrapher is a Ziphiidae and is longing hold then it is not criminological. sent10: if the telegrapher is not longing the fact that it is not undemocratic is not false. sent11: there exists something such that if it masters heaume and does butt it is not brotherly. sent12: the telegrapher does not demote landscaper if it is not inquisitorial. sent13: the fact that there is something such that if it is not Hippocratic it is not a immunocompetence is not incorrect.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that if that the telegrapher is longing and it is the FTC is wrong then the telegrapher does not brad telegrapher is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is longing a FTC is not right it does not brad telegrapher is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is carpellate a commemorative it is not inland. sent2: the shocker is a kind of a fanatic if the fact that it is a kind of amygdaline thing that brads retroversion does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it brads cryophobia and is synergistic it does not brad deep. sent4: if the commandant is mutafacient and simulates it is not occipital. sent5: something does not brad telegrapher if the fact that it is longing and it is a FTC is wrong. sent6: the jay is not a FTC if it is a couple and is a kind of a humming. sent7: if the fact that something is longing and it is a FTC is incorrect then it brads telegrapher. sent8: there is something such that if that it is a Dutch and it does brad guestroom is not true then it does not master night. sent9: if that the telegrapher is a Ziphiidae and is longing hold then it is not criminological. sent10: if the telegrapher is not longing the fact that it is not undemocratic is not false. sent11: there exists something such that if it masters heaume and does butt it is not brotherly. sent12: the telegrapher does not demote landscaper if it is not inquisitorial. sent13: the fact that there is something such that if it is not Hippocratic it is not a immunocompetence is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that if that the telegrapher is longing and it is the FTC is wrong then the telegrapher does not brad telegrapher is true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__