the flypaper is a kind of non-vulvar thing that is excitable.
sent1: if something that implies Limax is not ritualistic it is not inelastic. sent2: if that the icecap is a prowl hold then the pinetum does not superscribe puberty. sent3: that the keeper implies Limax and it is inelastic is not right if the illumination is non-limbic. sent4: the icecap is spartan a prowl. sent5: if something is emulous and is not limbic it is not a latchkey. sent6: if something is not emulous that it is not vulvar and it is excitable is false. sent7: the elemi is limbic. sent8: if a dirty thing does not superscribe hydrolysate then it is not a flock. sent9: the flypaper superscribes figure. sent10: that the flypaper is a lascar and it is emulous is not correct. sent11: something is both not vulvar and not a latchkey if it is not inelastic. sent12: the fact that the elemi is limbic and it is excitable is wrong. sent13: that the flypaper is vulvar and it is excitable is not correct if it is not emulous. sent14: if the fact that the flypaper is a lascar but it is not emulous is not correct then the mallee is a latchkey. sent15: the keeper implies Limax and is not ritualistic if the elemi is limbic. sent16: the keeper is inelastic if the mallee is a latchkey. sent17: the pinetum is a superhet if the osteocyte is a nominal. sent18: if the mallee is not vulvar and not a latchkey then the flypaper is not vulvar. sent19: the subdivider is phrenic or it is not a kind of a Hawthorne or both if there exists something such that it is not a punchboard. sent20: if something is not emulous then that it is a kind of vulvar thing that is excitable does not hold. sent21: the flypaper is excitable if the elemi is ritualistic. sent22: the illumination is not limbic if the pinetum does not superscribe puberty and is a superhet. sent23: if the keeper implies Limax and it is ritualistic it is not inelastic. sent24: there exists something such that it is not a punchboard. sent25: something is not inelastic if it implies Limax and is not non-ritualistic. sent26: the fact that the flypaper is vulvar and it is excitable is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the flypaper is a lascar and is non-emulous is incorrect.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the mallee is a kind of a latchkey.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the keeper is inelastic.; sent1 -> int3: if the keeper does imply Limax but it is not ritualistic that it is not inelastic is correct.; sent15 & sent7 -> int4: the keeper does imply Limax and is not ritualistic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the keeper is elastic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the flypaper is a lascar and is not emulous.; int7 -> int8: the flypaper is not emulous.; sent6 -> int9: that the fact that the flypaper is a kind of non-vulvar thing that is excitable is not false is not right if it is not emulous.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the flypaper is not vulvar but it is excitable.
sent11 -> int10: the mallee is both non-vulvar and not a latchkey if it is not inelastic.; sent4 -> int11: the icecap does prowl.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: the pinetum does not superscribe puberty.; sent24 & sent19 -> int13: the subdivider is phrenic and/or it is not a Hawthorne.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is phrenic and/or not a Hawthorne.;
$hypothesis$ = the flypaper is a kind of non-vulvar thing that is excitable. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that implies Limax is not ritualistic it is not inelastic. sent2: if that the icecap is a prowl hold then the pinetum does not superscribe puberty. sent3: that the keeper implies Limax and it is inelastic is not right if the illumination is non-limbic. sent4: the icecap is spartan a prowl. sent5: if something is emulous and is not limbic it is not a latchkey. sent6: if something is not emulous that it is not vulvar and it is excitable is false. sent7: the elemi is limbic. sent8: if a dirty thing does not superscribe hydrolysate then it is not a flock. sent9: the flypaper superscribes figure. sent10: that the flypaper is a lascar and it is emulous is not correct. sent11: something is both not vulvar and not a latchkey if it is not inelastic. sent12: the fact that the elemi is limbic and it is excitable is wrong. sent13: that the flypaper is vulvar and it is excitable is not correct if it is not emulous. sent14: if the fact that the flypaper is a lascar but it is not emulous is not correct then the mallee is a latchkey. sent15: the keeper implies Limax and is not ritualistic if the elemi is limbic. sent16: the keeper is inelastic if the mallee is a latchkey. sent17: the pinetum is a superhet if the osteocyte is a nominal. sent18: if the mallee is not vulvar and not a latchkey then the flypaper is not vulvar. sent19: the subdivider is phrenic or it is not a kind of a Hawthorne or both if there exists something such that it is not a punchboard. sent20: if something is not emulous then that it is a kind of vulvar thing that is excitable does not hold. sent21: the flypaper is excitable if the elemi is ritualistic. sent22: the illumination is not limbic if the pinetum does not superscribe puberty and is a superhet. sent23: if the keeper implies Limax and it is ritualistic it is not inelastic. sent24: there exists something such that it is not a punchboard. sent25: something is not inelastic if it implies Limax and is not non-ritualistic. sent26: the fact that the flypaper is vulvar and it is excitable is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the flypaper is a lascar and is non-emulous is incorrect.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the mallee is a kind of a latchkey.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the keeper is inelastic.; sent1 -> int3: if the keeper does imply Limax but it is not ritualistic that it is not inelastic is correct.; sent15 & sent7 -> int4: the keeper does imply Limax and is not ritualistic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the keeper is elastic.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the flypaper is a lascar and is not emulous.; int7 -> int8: the flypaper is not emulous.; sent6 -> int9: that the fact that the flypaper is a kind of non-vulvar thing that is excitable is not false is not right if it is not emulous.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__