the lipoprotein is not non-meningeal.
sent1: if the funambulist foals GSR the associate is an acute. sent2: if that the rubicelle is a arrogator is right then it is sustentacular. sent3: if the sundowner is not sacramental that the rubicelle is not a arrogator and is not a kind of a stick is incorrect. sent4: the lipoprotein is not unafraid if there exists something such that it is not non-acute and it is not a kind of a substantive. sent5: the lipoprotein is a recess if the rubicelle is unafraid. sent6: the sundowner is not sacramental if it decoys hydrocele. sent7: there is something such that it is an acute and it is a kind of a substantive. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a substantive. sent9: that the rubicelle is a arrogator is not incorrect if the funambulist is sustentacular. sent10: the lipoprotein is sustentacular. sent11: something does decoy hydrocele if the fact that it does not foal GSR and is not acute is false. sent12: there is something such that it is a gerontologist and is not a kind of a beaten. sent13: if the fact that the associate is either acute or substantive or both is not correct then the funambulist does not foal GSR. sent14: a arrogator is sustentacular. sent15: that the rubicelle is a arrogator but it does not stick is not correct if the sundowner is not sacramental. sent16: that the sundowner does not guess and it does not decoy hydrocele is false. sent17: the fact that the rubicelle is a arrogator but it does not stick is not true. sent18: the fact that the sundowner does not guess but it does decoy hydrocele is false. sent19: if that the sundowner is not a kind of a guess and it does not decoy hydrocele is not right the fact that it is not sacramental is correct. sent20: the associate is a kind of an acute. sent21: there exists something such that it is acute. sent22: if something is not unafraid it is meningeal. sent23: the sundowner is a kind of a stick and/or it is not sacramental if there is something such that it is a arrogator. sent24: the associate is an acute and is not substantive if the funambulist does foal GSR. sent25: if something is sustentacular it recesses. sent26: there are non-unafraid things. sent27: that the sundowner does foal GSR if the funambulist is sacramental hold. sent28: the funambulist foals GSR if the rubicelle recesses.
sent19 & sent16 -> int1: the sundowner is not sacramental.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the rubicelle is not a arrogator and it does not stick is wrong.; sent25 -> int3: the rubicelle is a recess if it is sustentacular.; sent22 -> int4: that the lipoprotein is meningeal if the lipoprotein is not unafraid is right.;
the lipoprotein is not meningeal.
$hypothesis$ = the lipoprotein is not non-meningeal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the funambulist foals GSR the associate is an acute. sent2: if that the rubicelle is a arrogator is right then it is sustentacular. sent3: if the sundowner is not sacramental that the rubicelle is not a arrogator and is not a kind of a stick is incorrect. sent4: the lipoprotein is not unafraid if there exists something such that it is not non-acute and it is not a kind of a substantive. sent5: the lipoprotein is a recess if the rubicelle is unafraid. sent6: the sundowner is not sacramental if it decoys hydrocele. sent7: there is something such that it is an acute and it is a kind of a substantive. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a substantive. sent9: that the rubicelle is a arrogator is not incorrect if the funambulist is sustentacular. sent10: the lipoprotein is sustentacular. sent11: something does decoy hydrocele if the fact that it does not foal GSR and is not acute is false. sent12: there is something such that it is a gerontologist and is not a kind of a beaten. sent13: if the fact that the associate is either acute or substantive or both is not correct then the funambulist does not foal GSR. sent14: a arrogator is sustentacular. sent15: that the rubicelle is a arrogator but it does not stick is not correct if the sundowner is not sacramental. sent16: that the sundowner does not guess and it does not decoy hydrocele is false. sent17: the fact that the rubicelle is a arrogator but it does not stick is not true. sent18: the fact that the sundowner does not guess but it does decoy hydrocele is false. sent19: if that the sundowner is not a kind of a guess and it does not decoy hydrocele is not right the fact that it is not sacramental is correct. sent20: the associate is a kind of an acute. sent21: there exists something such that it is acute. sent22: if something is not unafraid it is meningeal. sent23: the sundowner is a kind of a stick and/or it is not sacramental if there is something such that it is a arrogator. sent24: the associate is an acute and is not substantive if the funambulist does foal GSR. sent25: if something is sustentacular it recesses. sent26: there are non-unafraid things. sent27: that the sundowner does foal GSR if the funambulist is sacramental hold. sent28: the funambulist foals GSR if the rubicelle recesses. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent16 -> int1: the sundowner is not sacramental.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the rubicelle is not a arrogator and it does not stick is wrong.; sent25 -> int3: the rubicelle is a recess if it is sustentacular.; sent22 -> int4: that the lipoprotein is meningeal if the lipoprotein is not unafraid is right.; __UNKNOWN__