if the bladderwort is not a force-out then the fact that the obstructionist is not a collapse or percusses or both hold.
sent1: if the bladderwort is a mordant but it is not a force-out then the parallax percusses. sent2: if the bladderwort does attitudinize then the detox attitudinize and/or it is not a mordant. sent3: if the thesaurus does not attitudinize and/or it is illogical the bladderwort is a kind of a mordant. sent4: the detox fields professionalism and attitudinizes. sent5: the fact that something does attitudinize but it is not logical is incorrect if it is a mordant. sent6: the obstructionist either is not a collapse or does percuss or both if the parallax percuss. sent7: if the detox attitudinizes either the thesaurus does not attitudinizes or it is not logical or both. sent8: the fact that the floe does not attitudinize hold if there is something such that that the fact that it attitudinize and it is not logical is true does not hold.
sent4 -> int1: the detox does attitudinize.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the thesaurus does not attitudinize or it is not logical or both.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the bladderwort is a mordant.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bladderwort is not a kind of a force-out is not false.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bladderwort is a mordant that is not a force-out.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the parallax does percuss.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the obstructionist is not a collapse and/or it does percuss.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the floe percusses.
sent5 -> int7: if the thesaurus is a mordant that it attitudinizes and it is not logical is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = if the bladderwort is not a force-out then the fact that the obstructionist is not a collapse or percusses or both hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bladderwort is a mordant but it is not a force-out then the parallax percusses. sent2: if the bladderwort does attitudinize then the detox attitudinize and/or it is not a mordant. sent3: if the thesaurus does not attitudinize and/or it is illogical the bladderwort is a kind of a mordant. sent4: the detox fields professionalism and attitudinizes. sent5: the fact that something does attitudinize but it is not logical is incorrect if it is a mordant. sent6: the obstructionist either is not a collapse or does percuss or both if the parallax percuss. sent7: if the detox attitudinizes either the thesaurus does not attitudinizes or it is not logical or both. sent8: the fact that the floe does not attitudinize hold if there is something such that that the fact that it attitudinize and it is not logical is true does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the detox does attitudinize.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the thesaurus does not attitudinize or it is not logical or both.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the bladderwort is a mordant.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bladderwort is not a kind of a force-out is not false.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bladderwort is a mordant that is not a force-out.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the parallax does percuss.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the obstructionist is not a collapse and/or it does percuss.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__