the fact that the spectrograph is nonarboreal if the molding does ammoniate description is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the booster is nonarboreal is correct. sent2: the molding is not nonarboreal. sent3: the molding does not ammoniate neologist and is not offside. sent4: the molding does ammoniate description if that the fact that the spectrograph does not ammoniate Comrade and it is not nonarboreal is not right is true. sent5: the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and does ammoniate description. sent6: the spectrograph is nonarboreal if that the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and does ammoniate description is not right. sent7: if the molding ammoniates Comrade then the spectrograph is nonarboreal. sent8: the spectrograph is nonarboreal if the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and does not ammoniate description. sent9: the molding is not economical. sent10: the molding does not ammoniate Comrade. sent11: the spectrograph does not smooth. sent12: the papist does not ammoniate Comrade. sent13: if the fact that the molding is arboreal thing that does not ammoniate description does not hold then the spectrograph ammoniates Comrade. sent14: if that the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and it does not ammoniate description is not true the spectrograph is not arboreal. sent15: that the molding does ammoniate Comrade but it does not ammoniate description does not hold. sent16: if that the molding ammoniates Comrade and ammoniates description is not incorrect then the sphagnum does not ammoniates Comrade. sent17: the spectrograph ammoniates Comrade if the fact that the molding does not ammoniate description and it is not nonarboreal is wrong. sent18: the molding is nonarboreal if the spectrograph does ammoniate description. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of non-nonarboreal thing that does not stone Shrovetide hold if the fact that it does not ammoniate Comrade hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and it does not ammoniate description.; assump2 -> int1: the molding does not ammoniate description.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the molding ammoniates description.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and it does not ammoniate description is incorrect.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the spectrograph is nonarboreal.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the sphagnum is not nonarboreal and does not stone Shrovetide.
sent19 -> int5: the sphagnum is arboreal thing that does not stone Shrovetide if it does not ammoniate Comrade.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the spectrograph is nonarboreal if the molding does ammoniate description is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the booster is nonarboreal is correct. sent2: the molding is not nonarboreal. sent3: the molding does not ammoniate neologist and is not offside. sent4: the molding does ammoniate description if that the fact that the spectrograph does not ammoniate Comrade and it is not nonarboreal is not right is true. sent5: the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and does ammoniate description. sent6: the spectrograph is nonarboreal if that the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and does ammoniate description is not right. sent7: if the molding ammoniates Comrade then the spectrograph is nonarboreal. sent8: the spectrograph is nonarboreal if the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and does not ammoniate description. sent9: the molding is not economical. sent10: the molding does not ammoniate Comrade. sent11: the spectrograph does not smooth. sent12: the papist does not ammoniate Comrade. sent13: if the fact that the molding is arboreal thing that does not ammoniate description does not hold then the spectrograph ammoniates Comrade. sent14: if that the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and it does not ammoniate description is not true the spectrograph is not arboreal. sent15: that the molding does ammoniate Comrade but it does not ammoniate description does not hold. sent16: if that the molding ammoniates Comrade and ammoniates description is not incorrect then the sphagnum does not ammoniates Comrade. sent17: the spectrograph ammoniates Comrade if the fact that the molding does not ammoniate description and it is not nonarboreal is wrong. sent18: the molding is nonarboreal if the spectrograph does ammoniate description. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of non-nonarboreal thing that does not stone Shrovetide hold if the fact that it does not ammoniate Comrade hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and it does not ammoniate description.; assump2 -> int1: the molding does not ammoniate description.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the molding ammoniates description.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the molding does not ammoniate Comrade and it does not ammoniate description is incorrect.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the spectrograph is nonarboreal.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__