the lumen is a yeomanry.
sent1: if the AC is not a bonus then the fact that the lumen is a bonus and does not nest ROM is not right. sent2: the trichroism neglects neoclassicist. sent3: if the domicile is both a conciliation and a yeomanry the phenylpropanolamine does not nest pedestrian. sent4: the character is a gum but it is not a bonsai if the trichroism neglects neoclassicist. sent5: the domicile is not a conciliation. sent6: if the lumen is a gum but it is not a kind of a bonus then the character nests ROM. sent7: the phenylpropanolamine is not a kind of a battery if the domicile is a battery and it is nonoperational. sent8: the character does stud audio if the fact that it does not nest pedestrian and it does not nest ROM is not correct. sent9: that if there is something such that it nests pedestrian then that the character does not nests pedestrian and it does not nest ROM is not right hold. sent10: if something studs audio then the fact that it neglects neoclassicist and is not a bonus is false. sent11: if the character is a kind of a gum that is not a bonsai the AC studs audio. sent12: something is a yeomanry if that it is a bonus and does not nest ROM does not hold. sent13: the fact that the domicile is not tragic is right. sent14: the domicile is a Romans that is a battery if it does not stud cylindricality. sent15: something is tragic and it is a conciliation if it is not a kind of a battery. sent16: the domicile does not stud cylindricality. sent17: the domicile is nonoperational. sent18: if the fact that the domicile does not nest pedestrian is not wrong then it neglects roots. sent19: if that something does not nest pedestrian and does not neglect roots is not true then it nest pedestrian. sent20: the lumen is a bonsai. sent21: the phenylpropanolamine nests pedestrian if the domicile is not tragic but it does neglect roots. sent22: the fact that the fact that the AC does not nest pedestrian and does not neglect roots is not false does not hold if the phenylpropanolamine is tragic. sent23: that the character nests pedestrian is right. sent24: The neoclassicist neglects trichroism. sent25: if the AC is a bonus and does stud audio the phenylpropanolamine does not nest pedestrian. sent26: the AC is a kind of a yeomanry and does not nest ROM if the lumen studs audio.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the character is a gum but it is not a kind of a bonsai.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the AC studs audio is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the AC is a kind of a bonus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the AC is a bonus and studs audio.; int3 & sent25 -> int4: the phenylpropanolamine does not nest pedestrian.; sent12 -> int5: if the fact that the lumen is a kind of a bonus but it does not nest ROM does not hold it is a kind of a yeomanry.;
the lumen is not a yeomanry.
sent10 -> int6: if the character does stud audio then the fact that it neglects neoclassicist and is not a kind of a bonus is not correct.; sent19 -> int7: if that the AC does not nest pedestrian and it does not neglect roots does not hold it nest pedestrian.; sent15 -> int8: if the phenylpropanolamine is not a kind of a battery it is not non-tragic and is a conciliation.; sent14 & sent16 -> int9: that the domicile is a kind of Romans thing that is a battery is true.; int9 -> int10: the domicile is a battery.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the domicile is both a battery and nonoperational.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the phenylpropanolamine is not a battery.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the phenylpropanolamine is both tragic and a conciliation.; int13 -> int14: the phenylpropanolamine is tragic.; sent22 & int14 -> int15: that the AC does not nest pedestrian and does not neglect roots is not correct.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the AC does nest pedestrian.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that the fact that it nests pedestrian hold.; int17 & sent9 -> int18: the fact that the character does not nest pedestrian and does not nest ROM does not hold.; sent8 & int18 -> int19: the character studs audio.; int6 & int19 -> int20: that the character does neglect neoclassicist but it is not a bonus does not hold.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that the fact that it neglects neoclassicist and it is not a bonus is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the lumen is a yeomanry. ; $context$ = sent1: if the AC is not a bonus then the fact that the lumen is a bonus and does not nest ROM is not right. sent2: the trichroism neglects neoclassicist. sent3: if the domicile is both a conciliation and a yeomanry the phenylpropanolamine does not nest pedestrian. sent4: the character is a gum but it is not a bonsai if the trichroism neglects neoclassicist. sent5: the domicile is not a conciliation. sent6: if the lumen is a gum but it is not a kind of a bonus then the character nests ROM. sent7: the phenylpropanolamine is not a kind of a battery if the domicile is a battery and it is nonoperational. sent8: the character does stud audio if the fact that it does not nest pedestrian and it does not nest ROM is not correct. sent9: that if there is something such that it nests pedestrian then that the character does not nests pedestrian and it does not nest ROM is not right hold. sent10: if something studs audio then the fact that it neglects neoclassicist and is not a bonus is false. sent11: if the character is a kind of a gum that is not a bonsai the AC studs audio. sent12: something is a yeomanry if that it is a bonus and does not nest ROM does not hold. sent13: the fact that the domicile is not tragic is right. sent14: the domicile is a Romans that is a battery if it does not stud cylindricality. sent15: something is tragic and it is a conciliation if it is not a kind of a battery. sent16: the domicile does not stud cylindricality. sent17: the domicile is nonoperational. sent18: if the fact that the domicile does not nest pedestrian is not wrong then it neglects roots. sent19: if that something does not nest pedestrian and does not neglect roots is not true then it nest pedestrian. sent20: the lumen is a bonsai. sent21: the phenylpropanolamine nests pedestrian if the domicile is not tragic but it does neglect roots. sent22: the fact that the fact that the AC does not nest pedestrian and does not neglect roots is not false does not hold if the phenylpropanolamine is tragic. sent23: that the character nests pedestrian is right. sent24: The neoclassicist neglects trichroism. sent25: if the AC is a bonus and does stud audio the phenylpropanolamine does not nest pedestrian. sent26: the AC is a kind of a yeomanry and does not nest ROM if the lumen studs audio. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the character is a gum but it is not a kind of a bonsai.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the AC studs audio is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the AC is a kind of a bonus.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the AC is a bonus and studs audio.; int3 & sent25 -> int4: the phenylpropanolamine does not nest pedestrian.; sent12 -> int5: if the fact that the lumen is a kind of a bonus but it does not nest ROM does not hold it is a kind of a yeomanry.; __UNKNOWN__