the fact that there is something such that it is a Conoclinium that is a cotenant hold.
sent1: the noodle does clutter and it is a Sacco. sent2: something is an ark but it is not anthropological. sent3: there is something such that it scallops noodle. sent4: the noodle is a kind of a ileus. sent5: there is something such that it is not annelid. sent6: the fact that the noodle is an isomorphism is right if there exists something such that it is a kind of a cotenant and it is not a Conoclinium. sent7: there exists something such that it does trade and it is not non-annelid. sent8: the babbler is a kind of a cotenant if the noodle is not non-annelid. sent9: that the barb is not a Conoclinium and not an isomorphism does not hold if the babbler is a cotenant. sent10: the noodle is a cotenant if a Conoclinium is not an isomorphism. sent11: if the fact that something is not a Conoclinium and not an isomorphism is not right it trades. sent12: there exists something such that it trades. sent13: that the tracheophyte is supportive and it is an isomorphism is right. sent14: if a cotenant is not an isomorphism then the babbler is a Conoclinium. sent15: if the babbler is a kind of an isomorphism then the noodle is a kind of a Conoclinium. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it trades and is not an annelid is not incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a cotenant. sent18: the babbler is an isomorphism. sent19: the noodle is anthropological and it does trade. sent20: there exists something such that it is a Conoclinium. sent21: something is interfacial and it is obedient.
sent15 & sent18 -> int1: the noodle is a Conoclinium.;
the barb does trade.
sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the barb is not a Conoclinium and not an isomorphism is incorrect then it trades.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is a Conoclinium that is a cotenant hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the noodle does clutter and it is a Sacco. sent2: something is an ark but it is not anthropological. sent3: there is something such that it scallops noodle. sent4: the noodle is a kind of a ileus. sent5: there is something such that it is not annelid. sent6: the fact that the noodle is an isomorphism is right if there exists something such that it is a kind of a cotenant and it is not a Conoclinium. sent7: there exists something such that it does trade and it is not non-annelid. sent8: the babbler is a kind of a cotenant if the noodle is not non-annelid. sent9: that the barb is not a Conoclinium and not an isomorphism does not hold if the babbler is a cotenant. sent10: the noodle is a cotenant if a Conoclinium is not an isomorphism. sent11: if the fact that something is not a Conoclinium and not an isomorphism is not right it trades. sent12: there exists something such that it trades. sent13: that the tracheophyte is supportive and it is an isomorphism is right. sent14: if a cotenant is not an isomorphism then the babbler is a Conoclinium. sent15: if the babbler is a kind of an isomorphism then the noodle is a kind of a Conoclinium. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it trades and is not an annelid is not incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a cotenant. sent18: the babbler is an isomorphism. sent19: the noodle is anthropological and it does trade. sent20: there exists something such that it is a Conoclinium. sent21: something is interfacial and it is obedient. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent18 -> int1: the noodle is a Conoclinium.; __UNKNOWN__