the fact that the shogun is both not fearful and uneven is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that it is both cross-linguistic and biochemical. sent2: something is non-cross-linguistic. sent3: the isolationist is fearful. sent4: the isolationist is not cross-linguistic. sent5: that the shogun is non-fearful but it is uneven does not hold if the jilt is non-fearful. sent6: the shogun is cross-linguistic. sent7: that the Fothergilla is both not a Rockingham and cross-linguistic is false if the isolationist is a kind of a Rockingham. sent8: there is something such that that it is biochemical is not false. sent9: if there is something such that it is not biochemical but fearful then the jilt is cross-linguistic. sent10: if the jilt is fearful then the fact that the shogun is fearful and is uneven is false. sent11: the Fothergilla is a Rockingham if something that is not cross-linguistic is biochemical. sent12: that the isolationist is non-amphitheatric but it is biochemical is not right. sent13: the isolationist is not cross-linguistic but it is biochemical. sent14: that the shogun is fearful and uneven is not correct. sent15: the uranyl is amphitheatric if the Fothergilla is a Rockingham.
sent13 -> int1: there are non-cross-linguistic and biochemical things.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Fothergilla is a kind of a Rockingham.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the uranyl is amphitheatric.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the shogun is both not fearful and uneven is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is both cross-linguistic and biochemical. sent2: something is non-cross-linguistic. sent3: the isolationist is fearful. sent4: the isolationist is not cross-linguistic. sent5: that the shogun is non-fearful but it is uneven does not hold if the jilt is non-fearful. sent6: the shogun is cross-linguistic. sent7: that the Fothergilla is both not a Rockingham and cross-linguistic is false if the isolationist is a kind of a Rockingham. sent8: there is something such that that it is biochemical is not false. sent9: if there is something such that it is not biochemical but fearful then the jilt is cross-linguistic. sent10: if the jilt is fearful then the fact that the shogun is fearful and is uneven is false. sent11: the Fothergilla is a Rockingham if something that is not cross-linguistic is biochemical. sent12: that the isolationist is non-amphitheatric but it is biochemical is not right. sent13: the isolationist is not cross-linguistic but it is biochemical. sent14: that the shogun is fearful and uneven is not correct. sent15: the uranyl is amphitheatric if the Fothergilla is a Rockingham. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: there are non-cross-linguistic and biochemical things.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Fothergilla is a kind of a Rockingham.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the uranyl is amphitheatric.; __UNKNOWN__