the stigmatic does not occur.
sent1: the redundancy does not occur. sent2: the promulgation occurs. sent3: if the adornment occurs the bareboating does not occur. sent4: if that the holding does not occur hold the unlawfulness occurs and the sighing indomitability occurs. sent5: the vamping and the spectrometricness happens. sent6: the waxenness does not occur if the expunction occurs. sent7: the expunction happens. sent8: the fidgeting fumigation does not occur and the sighing Merida does not occur. sent9: if both the lowering and the stigmatic happens then the bottom does not occur. sent10: the unselfishness does not occur. sent11: the socialisticness occurs. sent12: the Romany happens. sent13: the asymptoticness does not occur and the fearfulness does not occur. sent14: the bottoming happens and the socialisticness happens if the asymptoticness does not occur. sent15: the stop happens if the contrastiness does not occur. sent16: the spectacles happens. sent17: the fact that that the socialisticness does not occur and the bottom does not occur is false if the asymptoticness occurs is not false. sent18: both the fidgeting varus and the socialisticness happens. sent19: if the non-waxenness and the non-liveness occurs the lowering happens. sent20: that the non-waxenness and the non-liveness occurs is triggered by that the expunction occurs.
sent20 & sent7 -> int1: both the non-waxenness and the non-liveness occurs.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the lowering occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stigmaticness happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the lowering and the stigmatic occurs.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: that the bottoming does not occur is not incorrect.; sent13 -> int5: the asymptoticness does not occur.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the bottoming and the socialisticness happens.; int6 -> int7: the bottoming happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the stigmatic occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the stigmatic does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the redundancy does not occur. sent2: the promulgation occurs. sent3: if the adornment occurs the bareboating does not occur. sent4: if that the holding does not occur hold the unlawfulness occurs and the sighing indomitability occurs. sent5: the vamping and the spectrometricness happens. sent6: the waxenness does not occur if the expunction occurs. sent7: the expunction happens. sent8: the fidgeting fumigation does not occur and the sighing Merida does not occur. sent9: if both the lowering and the stigmatic happens then the bottom does not occur. sent10: the unselfishness does not occur. sent11: the socialisticness occurs. sent12: the Romany happens. sent13: the asymptoticness does not occur and the fearfulness does not occur. sent14: the bottoming happens and the socialisticness happens if the asymptoticness does not occur. sent15: the stop happens if the contrastiness does not occur. sent16: the spectacles happens. sent17: the fact that that the socialisticness does not occur and the bottom does not occur is false if the asymptoticness occurs is not false. sent18: both the fidgeting varus and the socialisticness happens. sent19: if the non-waxenness and the non-liveness occurs the lowering happens. sent20: that the non-waxenness and the non-liveness occurs is triggered by that the expunction occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent7 -> int1: both the non-waxenness and the non-liveness occurs.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the lowering occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stigmaticness happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the lowering and the stigmatic occurs.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: that the bottoming does not occur is not incorrect.; sent13 -> int5: the asymptoticness does not occur.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the bottoming and the socialisticness happens.; int6 -> int7: the bottoming happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__