the fact that the copybook does level Adenauer is not false.
sent1: if the fact that either something does etymologize or it is not a bulrush or both is not right it is seraphic. sent2: if there are seraphic things then the copybook is a Fijian. sent3: the padrone is bacteriological. sent4: if that something is a neutering and/or it is not a kind of a sedation is not right then it does resume. sent5: there is something such that it is a Trilby and a shad. sent6: if there is something such that it is seraphic and sighs Rhamnus then the copybook does level Adenauer. sent7: the padrone does not etymologize. sent8: something is a Enesco if the fact that it is seraphic or does not sigh Rhamnus or both does not hold. sent9: the padrone is palpable. sent10: that either the copybook is ornithological or it is not afloat or both is wrong. sent11: there is something such that it resumes and is a pretension. sent12: the pouter is bacteriological if that there exists something such that the fact that it does not level rhesus and is not abient is false hold. sent13: if the padrone is metamorphic then the pouter sighs Rhamnus. sent14: something sighs Rhamnus and is a Enesco. sent15: the fact that the copybook is a kind of a pretension is true. sent16: the padrone is a Enesco and it is metamorphic if the microeconomist is not a Enesco. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it is not metamorphic and does not level Adenauer is not right. sent18: if the pouter does not level Adenauer the microeconomist level Adenauer. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it does not level rhesus and is not abient is not correct. sent20: if something is bacteriological that it does etymologize and/or it is not a bulrush does not hold. sent21: the padrone is metamorphic if a Enesco does etymologize. sent22: the fact that the pouter is metamorphic but it does not sigh Rhamnus is wrong.
sent1 -> int1: the pouter is seraphic if the fact that it either does etymologize or is not a bulrush or both is false.; sent20 -> int2: that the pouter etymologizes or is not a bulrush or both is incorrect if it is bacteriological.; sent19 & sent12 -> int3: the pouter is bacteriological.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the pouter etymologizes and/or it is not a bulrush is not correct.; int1 & int4 -> int5: the pouter is seraphic.;
if that either the Togolese is a neutering or it is not a kind of a sedation or both is not right then it does resume.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the copybook does level Adenauer is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that either something does etymologize or it is not a bulrush or both is not right it is seraphic. sent2: if there are seraphic things then the copybook is a Fijian. sent3: the padrone is bacteriological. sent4: if that something is a neutering and/or it is not a kind of a sedation is not right then it does resume. sent5: there is something such that it is a Trilby and a shad. sent6: if there is something such that it is seraphic and sighs Rhamnus then the copybook does level Adenauer. sent7: the padrone does not etymologize. sent8: something is a Enesco if the fact that it is seraphic or does not sigh Rhamnus or both does not hold. sent9: the padrone is palpable. sent10: that either the copybook is ornithological or it is not afloat or both is wrong. sent11: there is something such that it resumes and is a pretension. sent12: the pouter is bacteriological if that there exists something such that the fact that it does not level rhesus and is not abient is false hold. sent13: if the padrone is metamorphic then the pouter sighs Rhamnus. sent14: something sighs Rhamnus and is a Enesco. sent15: the fact that the copybook is a kind of a pretension is true. sent16: the padrone is a Enesco and it is metamorphic if the microeconomist is not a Enesco. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it is not metamorphic and does not level Adenauer is not right. sent18: if the pouter does not level Adenauer the microeconomist level Adenauer. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it does not level rhesus and is not abient is not correct. sent20: if something is bacteriological that it does etymologize and/or it is not a bulrush does not hold. sent21: the padrone is metamorphic if a Enesco does etymologize. sent22: the fact that the pouter is metamorphic but it does not sigh Rhamnus is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the pouter is seraphic if the fact that it either does etymologize or is not a bulrush or both is false.; sent20 -> int2: that the pouter etymologizes or is not a bulrush or both is incorrect if it is bacteriological.; sent19 & sent12 -> int3: the pouter is bacteriological.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the pouter etymologizes and/or it is not a bulrush is not correct.; int1 & int4 -> int5: the pouter is seraphic.; __UNKNOWN__