if the corollary does not occur that the polyhedralness and/or the call-out happens does not hold.
sent1: the circularizing does not occur if the custard-likeness does not occur. sent2: if that the assassination does not occur is not false then the fact that the polyhedralness and/or the call-out occurs is incorrect. sent3: if the corollary does not occur the non-presentationalness and the safeness happens. sent4: that the assassination does not occur is triggered by that not the presentationalness but the safeness occurs. sent5: both the non-unenthusiasticness and the Thai happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corollary does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-presentationalness and the safeness happens.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the assassination does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the polyhedralness happens and/or the call-out happens is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the corollary does not occur that the polyhedralness and/or the call-out happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the circularizing does not occur if the custard-likeness does not occur. sent2: if that the assassination does not occur is not false then the fact that the polyhedralness and/or the call-out occurs is incorrect. sent3: if the corollary does not occur the non-presentationalness and the safeness happens. sent4: that the assassination does not occur is triggered by that not the presentationalness but the safeness occurs. sent5: both the non-unenthusiasticness and the Thai happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the corollary does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-presentationalness and the safeness happens.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the assassination does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the polyhedralness happens and/or the call-out happens is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__