the linguine is not a kind of an opposition and is a kind of a turncock.
sent1: the mailman does recombine Peleus. sent2: the fact that the athanor is not modest is true. sent3: The Peleus does recombine mailman. sent4: the safehold is not a turncock and it is not avocational. sent5: that the mailman does not recombine Peleus if that the safehold is non-avocational thing that does not tweedle ague is correct hold. sent6: the pullback is not modest if the athanor is a kind of a transferee and does splutter corundom. sent7: the fact that the safehold does not splutter corundom hold if that the athanor does not tweedle ague and it is not avocational hold. sent8: the mailman does not tweedle ague. sent9: the pullback is not a telegraphese and it is not a kind of a transferee. sent10: the linguine is a kind of non-bloodless thing that does recombine Peleus. sent11: the hoofer is an opposition. sent12: the athanor does splutter corundom if there exists something such that the fact that it is not avocational and it does not tweedle ague does not hold. sent13: the paramagnet does not splutter corundom. sent14: there is something such that it does not splutter corundom and is not a transferee. sent15: the chachalaca is an opposition. sent16: the linguine is not an opposition but it is a kind of a turncock if the pullback is not modest. sent17: if the mailman is not a turncock the safehold does not tweedle ague and does recombine Peleus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the safehold is not avocational and it does not tweedle ague.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the mailman does not recombine Peleus.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the safehold is not avocational and does not tweedle ague does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is not avocational and does not tweedle ague is not correct.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the athanor does splutter corundom.;
$hypothesis$ = the linguine is not a kind of an opposition and is a kind of a turncock. ; $context$ = sent1: the mailman does recombine Peleus. sent2: the fact that the athanor is not modest is true. sent3: The Peleus does recombine mailman. sent4: the safehold is not a turncock and it is not avocational. sent5: that the mailman does not recombine Peleus if that the safehold is non-avocational thing that does not tweedle ague is correct hold. sent6: the pullback is not modest if the athanor is a kind of a transferee and does splutter corundom. sent7: the fact that the safehold does not splutter corundom hold if that the athanor does not tweedle ague and it is not avocational hold. sent8: the mailman does not tweedle ague. sent9: the pullback is not a telegraphese and it is not a kind of a transferee. sent10: the linguine is a kind of non-bloodless thing that does recombine Peleus. sent11: the hoofer is an opposition. sent12: the athanor does splutter corundom if there exists something such that the fact that it is not avocational and it does not tweedle ague does not hold. sent13: the paramagnet does not splutter corundom. sent14: there is something such that it does not splutter corundom and is not a transferee. sent15: the chachalaca is an opposition. sent16: the linguine is not an opposition but it is a kind of a turncock if the pullback is not modest. sent17: if the mailman is not a turncock the safehold does not tweedle ague and does recombine Peleus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the safehold is not avocational and it does not tweedle ague.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the mailman does not recombine Peleus.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the safehold is not avocational and does not tweedle ague does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is not avocational and does not tweedle ague is not correct.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the athanor does splutter corundom.; __UNKNOWN__