the fact that the cash-and-carriness does not occur is right if that the conjunctiveness but not the injunction happens is false.
sent1: that the eyeful occurs hold. sent2: the cash-and-carriness occurs. sent3: the misfeasance occurs. sent4: the studding optative occurs. sent5: that the cash-and-carriness does not occur is not wrong if the injunction and the neglecting lieutenant happens. sent6: both the candlepins and the conjunctiveness occurs. sent7: if that the excrescentness happens but the chorus does not occur is false the scandalization does not occur. sent8: the Keynesianness does not occur. sent9: the neglecting lieutenant occurs if the art does not occur. sent10: that the bulldog and the nesting tentacled happens prevents that the mediation happens. sent11: the enolicness occurs. sent12: the outage does not occur. sent13: the constipation does not occur. sent14: that the nonacceptance and the organizing occurs prevents that the scandalization occurs. sent15: both the printing and the non-unneuroticness happens. sent16: the isometricsness occurs. sent17: the nesting burn does not occur if not the baas but the cabotage happens. sent18: if not the constipation but the pervaporation happens then the art does not occur. sent19: the non-cash-and-carryness is prevented by that the injunction happens and the neglecting lieutenant occurs. sent20: that the art does not occur hold if the constipation and the pervaporation happens. sent21: not the constipation but the pervaporation happens. sent22: both the misfeasance and the lymphoidness happens. sent23: the non-Pythagoreanness and the oscillation happens. sent24: the cash-and-carriness happens if that the conjunctiveness occurs and the injunction does not occur is wrong.
sent6 -> int1: the conjunctiveness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the injunction does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the conjunctiveness occurs and the injunction does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the conjunctiveness but not the injunction happens does not hold.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the injunction occurs.; sent18 & sent21 -> int5: that the art does not occur is right.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the neglecting lieutenant occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the injunction happens and the neglecting lieutenant happens.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the cash-and-carriness does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cash-and-carriness does not occur is right if that the conjunctiveness but not the injunction happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the eyeful occurs hold. sent2: the cash-and-carriness occurs. sent3: the misfeasance occurs. sent4: the studding optative occurs. sent5: that the cash-and-carriness does not occur is not wrong if the injunction and the neglecting lieutenant happens. sent6: both the candlepins and the conjunctiveness occurs. sent7: if that the excrescentness happens but the chorus does not occur is false the scandalization does not occur. sent8: the Keynesianness does not occur. sent9: the neglecting lieutenant occurs if the art does not occur. sent10: that the bulldog and the nesting tentacled happens prevents that the mediation happens. sent11: the enolicness occurs. sent12: the outage does not occur. sent13: the constipation does not occur. sent14: that the nonacceptance and the organizing occurs prevents that the scandalization occurs. sent15: both the printing and the non-unneuroticness happens. sent16: the isometricsness occurs. sent17: the nesting burn does not occur if not the baas but the cabotage happens. sent18: if not the constipation but the pervaporation happens then the art does not occur. sent19: the non-cash-and-carryness is prevented by that the injunction happens and the neglecting lieutenant occurs. sent20: that the art does not occur hold if the constipation and the pervaporation happens. sent21: not the constipation but the pervaporation happens. sent22: both the misfeasance and the lymphoidness happens. sent23: the non-Pythagoreanness and the oscillation happens. sent24: the cash-and-carriness happens if that the conjunctiveness occurs and the injunction does not occur is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the conjunctiveness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the injunction does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the conjunctiveness occurs and the injunction does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the conjunctiveness but not the injunction happens does not hold.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the injunction occurs.; sent18 & sent21 -> int5: that the art does not occur is right.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the neglecting lieutenant occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the injunction happens and the neglecting lieutenant happens.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the cash-and-carriness does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__