that the grind is esoteric is not wrong.
sent1: the fact that the broadbill is not a kind of a whirl is not incorrect. sent2: if the store is inculpatory or it is a spark or both then the stager does not color. sent3: something is not a bey. sent4: if there are non-esoteric things then the grind is a kind of a whirl. sent5: the grind is a kind of a bey and it is esoteric if it is not a kind of a journalese. sent6: the grind is not esoteric if that there exists something such that it is not inculpatory and it is not a colored is true. sent7: the store does not color if it is not Gilbertian. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a whirl the grind is hemispheric. sent9: the tyramine is a kind of a whirl if there exists something such that that it is a journalese and it does spark is incorrect. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a bey then that the stager is a journalese that does spark does not hold. sent11: something is not inculpatory and it is uncolored if it is not Gilbertian. sent12: if a uncolored thing is a spark then the stager does not whirl. sent13: if the tyramine whirls or it is an aristocrat or both the store is not Gilbertian. sent14: the store is Gilbertian and/or it whirls.
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the stager is a kind of a journalese and is a kind of a spark does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a journalese and it does spark is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the tyramine does whirl.; int3 -> int4: either the tyramine whirls or it is a kind of an aristocrat or both.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the store is not Gilbertian.; sent11 -> int6: the store is both not inculpatory and not colored if it is not Gilbertian.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the store is not inculpatory and it does not color.; int7 -> int8: something is not inculpatory and not colored.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the grind is esoteric.
$hypothesis$ = that the grind is esoteric is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the broadbill is not a kind of a whirl is not incorrect. sent2: if the store is inculpatory or it is a spark or both then the stager does not color. sent3: something is not a bey. sent4: if there are non-esoteric things then the grind is a kind of a whirl. sent5: the grind is a kind of a bey and it is esoteric if it is not a kind of a journalese. sent6: the grind is not esoteric if that there exists something such that it is not inculpatory and it is not a colored is true. sent7: the store does not color if it is not Gilbertian. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a whirl the grind is hemispheric. sent9: the tyramine is a kind of a whirl if there exists something such that that it is a journalese and it does spark is incorrect. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a bey then that the stager is a journalese that does spark does not hold. sent11: something is not inculpatory and it is uncolored if it is not Gilbertian. sent12: if a uncolored thing is a spark then the stager does not whirl. sent13: if the tyramine whirls or it is an aristocrat or both the store is not Gilbertian. sent14: the store is Gilbertian and/or it whirls. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the stager is a kind of a journalese and is a kind of a spark does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a journalese and it does spark is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the tyramine does whirl.; int3 -> int4: either the tyramine whirls or it is a kind of an aristocrat or both.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the store is not Gilbertian.; sent11 -> int6: the store is both not inculpatory and not colored if it is not Gilbertian.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the store is not inculpatory and it does not color.; int7 -> int8: something is not inculpatory and not colored.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__