the fact that the teasing asterism does not occur is correct.
sent1: the non-polytheisticness and the non-pneumaticsness happens if the tympanicness happens. sent2: that the tympanicness and the hazing sadhu happens is brought about by that the shorts does not occur. sent3: the non-Britishness and the non-digestibleness happens if the supernalness occurs. sent4: the fact that the teasing pitsaw does not occur is true. sent5: that that the Finnishness occurs and the hazing brace occurs is triggered by the non-anorthiticness is true. sent6: the teasing asterism occurs if the teasing pitsaw happens and the supernalness does not occur. sent7: the psychogeneticness and the non-shortsness happens if the bulling happens. sent8: that the teasing asterism occurs is prevented by that the supernalness does not occur or that the Finnishness does not occur or both. sent9: that both the non-polytheisticness and the non-pneumaticsness occurs prevents that the anorthiticness occurs. sent10: the hazing Fonteyn does not occur if that that the supernalness happens and/or the teasing pitsaw happens is incorrect hold. sent11: that both the non-Britishness and the non-digestibleness happens prevents that the teasing pitsaw does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the supernalness occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Britishness does not occur and the digestibleness does not occur.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the teasing pitsaw happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the supernalness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the non-supernalness and/or the non-Finnishness happens.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the teasing asterism happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the teasing asterism does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-polytheisticness and the non-pneumaticsness happens if the tympanicness happens. sent2: that the tympanicness and the hazing sadhu happens is brought about by that the shorts does not occur. sent3: the non-Britishness and the non-digestibleness happens if the supernalness occurs. sent4: the fact that the teasing pitsaw does not occur is true. sent5: that that the Finnishness occurs and the hazing brace occurs is triggered by the non-anorthiticness is true. sent6: the teasing asterism occurs if the teasing pitsaw happens and the supernalness does not occur. sent7: the psychogeneticness and the non-shortsness happens if the bulling happens. sent8: that the teasing asterism occurs is prevented by that the supernalness does not occur or that the Finnishness does not occur or both. sent9: that both the non-polytheisticness and the non-pneumaticsness occurs prevents that the anorthiticness occurs. sent10: the hazing Fonteyn does not occur if that that the supernalness happens and/or the teasing pitsaw happens is incorrect hold. sent11: that both the non-Britishness and the non-digestibleness happens prevents that the teasing pitsaw does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the supernalness occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the Britishness does not occur and the digestibleness does not occur.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the teasing pitsaw happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the supernalness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the non-supernalness and/or the non-Finnishness happens.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__