the clack is not non-conjugal but it does not lather Leonurus.
sent1: the CFO is not a kind of a Marathon if the fact that it is not a kind of a Andrenidae and it is a Oedipus is wrong. sent2: The washerman does not lather antimony. sent3: if the CFO does lather Leonurus then the clack is conjugal but it does not lather Leonurus. sent4: that the antimony is not tasteful if the fact that the antimony is betulaceous thing that is tasteful is not correct is not incorrect. sent5: if the antimony does not lather washerman then it is judgmental. sent6: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a breakable that the clack is conjugal and it is breakable is not true. sent7: the fact that the derringer does not hurtle feverroot is correct. sent8: if that something does not disengage but it is a kind of a breakable does not hold then it is not a Andrenidae. sent9: the fruiterer is not tasteful. sent10: the antimony does not lather washerman. sent11: something does lather washerman and is not non-betulaceous if it is not a Selar. sent12: that the clack is not judgmental but tasteful if the antimony lathers washerman is true. sent13: if the antimony does not disengage but it is breakable it is not judgmental. sent14: something is not a Andrenidae if it is not judgmental and it is tasteful. sent15: if something that is not a kind of a Andrenidae is not tasteful then the CFO does lather Leonurus. sent16: that something is conjugal and does not lather Leonurus is not true if it is not a Andrenidae.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antimony does not disengage and is breakable.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the antimony is not judgmental.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: the antimony is judgmental.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the antimony does not disengage but it is a breakable is not correct.; sent8 -> int5: the antimony is not a Andrenidae if that the fact that it does not disengage and is a breakable hold is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antimony is not a Andrenidae.; sent9 -> int7: something is not tasteful.;
the fact that the clack is conjugal and does not lather Leonurus is not true.
sent16 -> int8: if the clack is not a kind of a Andrenidae then the fact that it is conjugal and does not lather Leonurus is not right.; sent14 -> int9: the clack is not a Andrenidae if it is both not judgmental and not non-tasteful.; sent11 -> int10: if the antimony is not a kind of a Selar the fact that it lathers washerman and is betulaceous is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the clack is not non-conjugal but it does not lather Leonurus. ; $context$ = sent1: the CFO is not a kind of a Marathon if the fact that it is not a kind of a Andrenidae and it is a Oedipus is wrong. sent2: The washerman does not lather antimony. sent3: if the CFO does lather Leonurus then the clack is conjugal but it does not lather Leonurus. sent4: that the antimony is not tasteful if the fact that the antimony is betulaceous thing that is tasteful is not correct is not incorrect. sent5: if the antimony does not lather washerman then it is judgmental. sent6: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a breakable that the clack is conjugal and it is breakable is not true. sent7: the fact that the derringer does not hurtle feverroot is correct. sent8: if that something does not disengage but it is a kind of a breakable does not hold then it is not a Andrenidae. sent9: the fruiterer is not tasteful. sent10: the antimony does not lather washerman. sent11: something does lather washerman and is not non-betulaceous if it is not a Selar. sent12: that the clack is not judgmental but tasteful if the antimony lathers washerman is true. sent13: if the antimony does not disengage but it is breakable it is not judgmental. sent14: something is not a Andrenidae if it is not judgmental and it is tasteful. sent15: if something that is not a kind of a Andrenidae is not tasteful then the CFO does lather Leonurus. sent16: that something is conjugal and does not lather Leonurus is not true if it is not a Andrenidae. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antimony does not disengage and is breakable.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the antimony is not judgmental.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: the antimony is judgmental.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the antimony does not disengage but it is a breakable is not correct.; sent8 -> int5: the antimony is not a Andrenidae if that the fact that it does not disengage and is a breakable hold is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antimony is not a Andrenidae.; sent9 -> int7: something is not tasteful.; __UNKNOWN__