the pectin does not impede ignobleness.
sent1: the fact that the sarcosome is not opisthognathous is correct if the piezoelectricity is a cobble that is opisthognathous. sent2: if the cytoplasm is a shabbiness and/or it does not relieve the g does not relieve. sent3: the sarcosome does impede linguine if it does not impede Appenzeller. sent4: the pectin does streak if the pullback is opisthognathous and/or it is not a kind of a antonymy. sent5: the fact that the jester does not impede ignobleness is not wrong if that it is a kind of a dicamptodon that cobbles is false. sent6: the piezoelectricity cobbles. sent7: the pectin impedes ignobleness if it does streak. sent8: the great-aunt does not impede ignobleness if the fact that the jester does not impede ignobleness is not wrong. sent9: something is a kind of a antonymy if it is both not a streak and not opisthognathous. sent10: if the pullback is opisthognathous the pectin is a streak. sent11: if something that is auspicious does not suggest Chiwere the sarcosome does not impede Appenzeller. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it burglarizes is not right. sent13: if something that cobbles is not a dicamptodon the sarcosome does not impede linguine. sent14: there is something such that it is a cobble and it is not a dicamptodon. sent15: the pectin is auspicious if the sarcosome impedes linguine but it is not auspicious. sent16: the fact that the sarcosome does not streak hold. sent17: the piezoelectricity impedes Appenzeller and it is a antonymy if the great-aunt is not opisthognathous. sent18: the fact that that the jester is a dicamptodon and is a cobble is false is right if the g does not relieve. sent19: the pullback is not a antonymy if the fact that it is auspicious and it does not suggest Chiwere is wrong. sent20: the great-aunt is non-opisthognathous and a streak if it does not impede ignobleness. sent21: if something does impede linguine then it does not impede ignobleness and it does not impede Appenzeller. sent22: if the great-aunt is opisthognathous the piezoelectricity is opisthognathous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pullback is a kind of auspicious thing that does not suggest Chiwere.; assump1 -> int1: something is a kind of auspicious thing that does not suggest Chiwere.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the sarcosome does not impede Appenzeller.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the sarcosome impedes linguine.; sent14 & sent13 -> int4: the sarcosome does not impede linguine.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the pullback is auspicious and does not suggest Chiwere is incorrect.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the pullback is not a antonymy.; int7 -> int8: the pullback is opisthognathous or is not a antonymy or both.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the fact that the pectin streaks hold.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the pectin is auspicious.
$hypothesis$ = the pectin does not impede ignobleness. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the sarcosome is not opisthognathous is correct if the piezoelectricity is a cobble that is opisthognathous. sent2: if the cytoplasm is a shabbiness and/or it does not relieve the g does not relieve. sent3: the sarcosome does impede linguine if it does not impede Appenzeller. sent4: the pectin does streak if the pullback is opisthognathous and/or it is not a kind of a antonymy. sent5: the fact that the jester does not impede ignobleness is not wrong if that it is a kind of a dicamptodon that cobbles is false. sent6: the piezoelectricity cobbles. sent7: the pectin impedes ignobleness if it does streak. sent8: the great-aunt does not impede ignobleness if the fact that the jester does not impede ignobleness is not wrong. sent9: something is a kind of a antonymy if it is both not a streak and not opisthognathous. sent10: if the pullback is opisthognathous the pectin is a streak. sent11: if something that is auspicious does not suggest Chiwere the sarcosome does not impede Appenzeller. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it burglarizes is not right. sent13: if something that cobbles is not a dicamptodon the sarcosome does not impede linguine. sent14: there is something such that it is a cobble and it is not a dicamptodon. sent15: the pectin is auspicious if the sarcosome impedes linguine but it is not auspicious. sent16: the fact that the sarcosome does not streak hold. sent17: the piezoelectricity impedes Appenzeller and it is a antonymy if the great-aunt is not opisthognathous. sent18: the fact that that the jester is a dicamptodon and is a cobble is false is right if the g does not relieve. sent19: the pullback is not a antonymy if the fact that it is auspicious and it does not suggest Chiwere is wrong. sent20: the great-aunt is non-opisthognathous and a streak if it does not impede ignobleness. sent21: if something does impede linguine then it does not impede ignobleness and it does not impede Appenzeller. sent22: if the great-aunt is opisthognathous the piezoelectricity is opisthognathous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pullback is a kind of auspicious thing that does not suggest Chiwere.; assump1 -> int1: something is a kind of auspicious thing that does not suggest Chiwere.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the sarcosome does not impede Appenzeller.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the sarcosome impedes linguine.; sent14 & sent13 -> int4: the sarcosome does not impede linguine.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the pullback is auspicious and does not suggest Chiwere is incorrect.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the pullback is not a antonymy.; int7 -> int8: the pullback is opisthognathous or is not a antonymy or both.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the fact that the pectin streaks hold.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__