the thymol is a misinformation.
sent1: if a macaronic thing does not sideswipe it does not rubbish maltha. sent2: the antheridiophore is a kind of a perfumed and is not a VDU if the fact that it is insecticidal hold. sent3: the antheridiophore is not a last if it is a perfumed and is not a VDU. sent4: the thymol is not a kind of a sideswipe. sent5: something is macaronic if it is not therapeutic. sent6: the fact that the frontal is not therapeutic is correct if that the maltha does rubbish maltha hold. sent7: if something is unclean then it is not a kind of a misinformation. sent8: the antheridiophore is not a kind of a sideswipe. sent9: if that the antheridiophore is not a last is not false then it is macaronic and it is not a sideswipe. sent10: if the thymol does clean then the fact that the maltha is neurotoxic hold. sent11: if something does not rubbish maltha then either it is neurotoxic or it does clean or both. sent12: if the antheridiophore does not last the frontal is not macaronic. sent13: if that the antheridiophore is not a sideswipe is not false then it is last or not non-macaronic or both. sent14: if that the frontal does rubbish maltha but it is not therapeutic is not correct the maltha does not rubbish maltha. sent15: if either the antheridiophore does not last or it is macaronic or both then the frontal is not macaronic. sent16: the frontal does rubbish maltha. sent17: the frontal is not therapeutic if the maltha is neurotoxic and/or it does rubbish maltha. sent18: the antheridiophore is not a kind of a last and/or it is macaronic if it is not a kind of a sideswipe.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thymol is a clean.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the maltha is neurotoxic.; int1 -> int2: the maltha either is neurotoxic or does rubbish maltha or both.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the frontal is not therapeutic.; sent5 -> int4: if that the frontal is not therapeutic is correct then it is macaronic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the frontal is macaronic.; sent18 & sent8 -> int6: the antheridiophore is not last or macaronic or both.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the frontal is not macaronic.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the thymol is not clean.; sent7 -> int10: the thymol is not a misinformation if it does not clean.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the thymol is a misinformation.
sent11 -> int11: if that the maltha rubbishes maltha is false then it is neurotoxic and/or it is a clean.; sent1 -> int12: if the antheridiophore is macaronic and is not a sideswipe then it does not rubbish maltha.;
$hypothesis$ = the thymol is a misinformation. ; $context$ = sent1: if a macaronic thing does not sideswipe it does not rubbish maltha. sent2: the antheridiophore is a kind of a perfumed and is not a VDU if the fact that it is insecticidal hold. sent3: the antheridiophore is not a last if it is a perfumed and is not a VDU. sent4: the thymol is not a kind of a sideswipe. sent5: something is macaronic if it is not therapeutic. sent6: the fact that the frontal is not therapeutic is correct if that the maltha does rubbish maltha hold. sent7: if something is unclean then it is not a kind of a misinformation. sent8: the antheridiophore is not a kind of a sideswipe. sent9: if that the antheridiophore is not a last is not false then it is macaronic and it is not a sideswipe. sent10: if the thymol does clean then the fact that the maltha is neurotoxic hold. sent11: if something does not rubbish maltha then either it is neurotoxic or it does clean or both. sent12: if the antheridiophore does not last the frontal is not macaronic. sent13: if that the antheridiophore is not a sideswipe is not false then it is last or not non-macaronic or both. sent14: if that the frontal does rubbish maltha but it is not therapeutic is not correct the maltha does not rubbish maltha. sent15: if either the antheridiophore does not last or it is macaronic or both then the frontal is not macaronic. sent16: the frontal does rubbish maltha. sent17: the frontal is not therapeutic if the maltha is neurotoxic and/or it does rubbish maltha. sent18: the antheridiophore is not a kind of a last and/or it is macaronic if it is not a kind of a sideswipe. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thymol is a clean.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the maltha is neurotoxic.; int1 -> int2: the maltha either is neurotoxic or does rubbish maltha or both.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the frontal is not therapeutic.; sent5 -> int4: if that the frontal is not therapeutic is correct then it is macaronic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the frontal is macaronic.; sent18 & sent8 -> int6: the antheridiophore is not last or macaronic or both.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the frontal is not macaronic.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the thymol is not clean.; sent7 -> int10: the thymol is not a misinformation if it does not clean.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__