the outfall is not a climatologist.
sent1: the bellarmine does not pitch goby. sent2: that there exists something such that it pitches goby hold. sent3: that the outfall does not pitch goby is not incorrect if the fact that the mariner is paleontological and/or it does not befuddle is wrong. sent4: the mariner does not befuddle if it is not a kind of a climatologist. sent5: if the fact that the mariner pitches goby and/or it is not paleontological is not correct the outfall is not a kind of a climatologist. sent6: there exists something such that it is paleontological. sent7: the outfall is not paleontological if that either the mariner pitches goby or it is not a climatologist or both is not correct. sent8: if that the mariner is a climatologist and/or it does not pitch goby is not right the outfall does not befuddle. sent9: the mariner does not pitch goby if the fact that the outfall is a climatologist and/or it does not befuddle is not correct. sent10: the mariner does not sound. sent11: the outfall does not pitch goby if that the mariner does befuddle or it is a kind of a climatologist or both is false. sent12: if that the outfall is paleontological and/or it pitches goby does not hold then the mariner is not a kind of a climatologist. sent13: if that the mariner either is paleontological or pitches goby or both is not right the outfall is not a kind of a climatologist. sent14: there exists something such that it is a trimer. sent15: that either the mariner is paleontological or it does not befuddle or both does not hold if there is something such that it is a trimer. sent16: if that the mariner does pitch goby and/or it is not paleontological is not right then the outfall does not befuddle.
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: that the mariner either is paleontological or does not befuddle or both does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the outfall does not pitch goby.;
$hypothesis$ = the outfall is not a climatologist. ; $context$ = sent1: the bellarmine does not pitch goby. sent2: that there exists something such that it pitches goby hold. sent3: that the outfall does not pitch goby is not incorrect if the fact that the mariner is paleontological and/or it does not befuddle is wrong. sent4: the mariner does not befuddle if it is not a kind of a climatologist. sent5: if the fact that the mariner pitches goby and/or it is not paleontological is not correct the outfall is not a kind of a climatologist. sent6: there exists something such that it is paleontological. sent7: the outfall is not paleontological if that either the mariner pitches goby or it is not a climatologist or both is not correct. sent8: if that the mariner is a climatologist and/or it does not pitch goby is not right the outfall does not befuddle. sent9: the mariner does not pitch goby if the fact that the outfall is a climatologist and/or it does not befuddle is not correct. sent10: the mariner does not sound. sent11: the outfall does not pitch goby if that the mariner does befuddle or it is a kind of a climatologist or both is false. sent12: if that the outfall is paleontological and/or it pitches goby does not hold then the mariner is not a kind of a climatologist. sent13: if that the mariner either is paleontological or pitches goby or both is not right the outfall is not a kind of a climatologist. sent14: there exists something such that it is a trimer. sent15: that either the mariner is paleontological or it does not befuddle or both does not hold if there is something such that it is a trimer. sent16: if that the mariner does pitch goby and/or it is not paleontological is not right then the outfall does not befuddle. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: that the mariner either is paleontological or does not befuddle or both does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the outfall does not pitch goby.; __UNKNOWN__