that that the naphthol does shrink or it is Anglophobic or both is incorrect is not false.
sent1: something is a bottle-grass and/or it is Anglophobic if the fact that it shrinks is right. sent2: if something does not recite the fact that it is not a healthfulness and is not polar is wrong. sent3: the bunchgrass is not alterable and it does not recite. sent4: if the naphthol is not non-polar then it does report agreeableness and/or it reports Bowditch. sent5: something that is polar is trophotropic or not a petabyte or both. sent6: if something is not a petabyte it is not a kind of a healthfulness. sent7: the valve is not a healthfulness. sent8: if something is unalterable then it is not a kind of a bottle-grass. sent9: a polar thing is trophotropic or a petabyte or both. sent10: if that the VCR does not clutch hold then it is not functional. sent11: the naphthol is combinative. sent12: if the fact that something is trophotropic and/or is not a petabyte is right the fact that it is not a kind of a healthfulness is not incorrect. sent13: something is spiritless if it is non-rehabilitative. sent14: something that does not clutch is a nonconformist. sent15: the fact that either the energizer is a kind of an alabaster or it does not negotiate whitey or both hold. sent16: the naphthol is logogrammatic. sent17: if that the stereoscope does not recite is true then it is not a Sabin. sent18: something shrinks if the fact that it is not a kind of a bottle-grass is not wrong. sent19: the naphthol is trophotropic and/or it is a petabyte if it is polar. sent20: the naphthol is trophotropic and/or it is a kind of a petabyte. sent21: the naphthol is not a kind of a healthfulness if it is not a petabyte. sent22: the naphthol is not a bottle-grass if it is not alterable. sent23: if the fact that something does recite and it is alterable does not hold then it is not a kind of a bottle-grass. sent24: the dangleberry is not a crowning if that it is not shelflike hold. sent25: if something is not a healthfulness then the fact that it recites and is alterable is not true. sent26: that something is unmilitary is not wrong if it is not a kind of a hearthrug. sent27: if the naphthol is combinative then it is polar.
sent5 -> int1: if that the naphthol is polar is correct either it is trophotropic or it is not a petabyte or both.; sent27 & sent11 -> int2: the naphthol is not non-polar.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the naphthol is trophotropic and/or it is not a petabyte.; sent12 -> int4: the naphthol is not a healthfulness if it is trophotropic and/or it is not a petabyte.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the naphthol is not a healthfulness.; sent25 -> int6: the fact that that the naphthol recites and it is alterable is not wrong is wrong if it is not a healthfulness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the naphthol recites and is alterable does not hold.; sent23 -> int8: if that the naphthol does recite and is alterable is not correct then it is not a kind of a bottle-grass.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the naphthol is not a bottle-grass.; sent18 -> int10: if the naphthol is not a kind of a bottle-grass it shrinks.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the naphthol shrinks.; int11 -> hypothesis;
that the naphthol shrinks or it is Anglophobic or both is false.
sent2 -> int12: the fact that if the bunchgrass does not recite then the fact that the bunchgrass is both not a healthfulness and not polar is false is not false.; sent3 -> int13: the bunchgrass does not recite.; int12 & int13 -> int14: that the bunchgrass is not a healthfulness and not polar is not true.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it is both not a healthfulness and not polar does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the naphthol does shrink or it is Anglophobic or both is incorrect is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a bottle-grass and/or it is Anglophobic if the fact that it shrinks is right. sent2: if something does not recite the fact that it is not a healthfulness and is not polar is wrong. sent3: the bunchgrass is not alterable and it does not recite. sent4: if the naphthol is not non-polar then it does report agreeableness and/or it reports Bowditch. sent5: something that is polar is trophotropic or not a petabyte or both. sent6: if something is not a petabyte it is not a kind of a healthfulness. sent7: the valve is not a healthfulness. sent8: if something is unalterable then it is not a kind of a bottle-grass. sent9: a polar thing is trophotropic or a petabyte or both. sent10: if that the VCR does not clutch hold then it is not functional. sent11: the naphthol is combinative. sent12: if the fact that something is trophotropic and/or is not a petabyte is right the fact that it is not a kind of a healthfulness is not incorrect. sent13: something is spiritless if it is non-rehabilitative. sent14: something that does not clutch is a nonconformist. sent15: the fact that either the energizer is a kind of an alabaster or it does not negotiate whitey or both hold. sent16: the naphthol is logogrammatic. sent17: if that the stereoscope does not recite is true then it is not a Sabin. sent18: something shrinks if the fact that it is not a kind of a bottle-grass is not wrong. sent19: the naphthol is trophotropic and/or it is a petabyte if it is polar. sent20: the naphthol is trophotropic and/or it is a kind of a petabyte. sent21: the naphthol is not a kind of a healthfulness if it is not a petabyte. sent22: the naphthol is not a bottle-grass if it is not alterable. sent23: if the fact that something does recite and it is alterable does not hold then it is not a kind of a bottle-grass. sent24: the dangleberry is not a crowning if that it is not shelflike hold. sent25: if something is not a healthfulness then the fact that it recites and is alterable is not true. sent26: that something is unmilitary is not wrong if it is not a kind of a hearthrug. sent27: if the naphthol is combinative then it is polar. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if that the naphthol is polar is correct either it is trophotropic or it is not a petabyte or both.; sent27 & sent11 -> int2: the naphthol is not non-polar.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the naphthol is trophotropic and/or it is not a petabyte.; sent12 -> int4: the naphthol is not a healthfulness if it is trophotropic and/or it is not a petabyte.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the naphthol is not a healthfulness.; sent25 -> int6: the fact that that the naphthol recites and it is alterable is not wrong is wrong if it is not a healthfulness.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the naphthol recites and is alterable does not hold.; sent23 -> int8: if that the naphthol does recite and is alterable is not correct then it is not a kind of a bottle-grass.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the naphthol is not a bottle-grass.; sent18 -> int10: if the naphthol is not a kind of a bottle-grass it shrinks.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the naphthol shrinks.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__