the redwood is a pulchritude.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a falcon that is apicultural is right. sent2: the purveyor is evangelical. sent3: if the purveyor does not cheerlead then the photostat cheerlead and is not a kind of a Rottweiler. sent4: the purveyor is paranormal. sent5: if something that is paranormal is evangelical then it does not cheerlead. sent6: that the purveyor does crow and it is anthropometric is false if the ice does not cheerlead. sent7: the fact that the photostat is not a crow but it cheerleads does not hold if it is not anthropometric. sent8: something does gong purveyor and it is a kind of a Rottweiler if it does not cheerlead. sent9: if the outfield does not gong purveyor the fact that the ice is not a kind of a crow but it is anthropometric is not right. sent10: the redwood is not a pulchritude if there exists something such that that it is not a crow and it is anthropometric is incorrect. sent11: something cheerleads and it is a kind of a Rottweiler. sent12: if something that cheerleads is not a kind of a Rottweiler then the outfield does not gong purveyor.
sent5 -> int1: the purveyor does not cheerlead if it is paranormal and it is evangelical.; sent4 & sent2 -> int2: the purveyor is paranormal thing that is evangelical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the purveyor does not cheerlead.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the photostat does cheerlead and is not a Rottweiler.; int4 -> int5: something cheerleads and is not a Rottweiler.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the outfield does not gong purveyor.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the ice is not a crow but it is anthropometric is not right.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not a crow and it is anthropometric is not correct.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the sclerite does gong purveyor.
sent8 -> int9: if the fact that the sclerite does not cheerlead is correct it gongs purveyor and is a Rottweiler.;
$hypothesis$ = the redwood is a pulchritude. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a falcon that is apicultural is right. sent2: the purveyor is evangelical. sent3: if the purveyor does not cheerlead then the photostat cheerlead and is not a kind of a Rottweiler. sent4: the purveyor is paranormal. sent5: if something that is paranormal is evangelical then it does not cheerlead. sent6: that the purveyor does crow and it is anthropometric is false if the ice does not cheerlead. sent7: the fact that the photostat is not a crow but it cheerleads does not hold if it is not anthropometric. sent8: something does gong purveyor and it is a kind of a Rottweiler if it does not cheerlead. sent9: if the outfield does not gong purveyor the fact that the ice is not a kind of a crow but it is anthropometric is not right. sent10: the redwood is not a pulchritude if there exists something such that that it is not a crow and it is anthropometric is incorrect. sent11: something cheerleads and it is a kind of a Rottweiler. sent12: if something that cheerleads is not a kind of a Rottweiler then the outfield does not gong purveyor. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the purveyor does not cheerlead if it is paranormal and it is evangelical.; sent4 & sent2 -> int2: the purveyor is paranormal thing that is evangelical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the purveyor does not cheerlead.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the photostat does cheerlead and is not a Rottweiler.; int4 -> int5: something cheerleads and is not a Rottweiler.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the outfield does not gong purveyor.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the ice is not a crow but it is anthropometric is not right.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not a crow and it is anthropometric is not correct.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__