the fact that there exists something such that if it stigmatizes settee and it is not a lyricism then it is colorectal is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if it perplexes Dermacentor and is not a kind of a caterer then it is a LOX. sent2: if the uropygium is gregarious and it is a Hirschsprung then it is colorectal. sent3: if the Mongol is a kind of a Sorbian but it is not colorectal then that it is a Epipremnum is correct. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a rhapsody and is not a homefolk is true then it is anemic. sent5: something is colorectal if it stigmatizes settee and is not a lyricism. sent6: if a Aeschylean thing does not stigmatize chiaroscuro it is contrapuntal. sent7: if something is macroeconomics and is not a Lublin it does excise lodgment. sent8: the spiral is a kind of a specific if it is anaphoric thing that does not stigmatize hawkbit. sent9: something is a kind of a broad-bean if it is a kind of a homefolk that perplexes Jeth. sent10: there is something such that if it is a kind of a missionary that stigmatizes gastroenterology it slums. sent11: if something that is experimental is a homefolk it does excise depository. sent12: if the depository is aphanitic but it is not supernaturalist it is a friary. sent13: the depository is a lyricism if it is a nucleoplasm that stigmatizes bounder. sent14: if something does stigmatize Trilisa and it excises lodgment it is advective. sent15: if something is a rustic but it is not bumpy it is secretarial. sent16: if the toyshop is colorectal and it is woody then it is unchaste. sent17: there is something such that if it is a nonexistence that is a kind of a nucleoplasm it is xenogeneic. sent18: there exists something such that if it perplexes featherfoil and it does not excise phenothiazine it is abnormal.
sent5 -> int1: if the depository does stigmatize settee and is not a lyricism then it is not non-colorectal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it stigmatizes settee and it is not a lyricism then it is colorectal is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it perplexes Dermacentor and is not a kind of a caterer then it is a LOX. sent2: if the uropygium is gregarious and it is a Hirschsprung then it is colorectal. sent3: if the Mongol is a kind of a Sorbian but it is not colorectal then that it is a Epipremnum is correct. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a rhapsody and is not a homefolk is true then it is anemic. sent5: something is colorectal if it stigmatizes settee and is not a lyricism. sent6: if a Aeschylean thing does not stigmatize chiaroscuro it is contrapuntal. sent7: if something is macroeconomics and is not a Lublin it does excise lodgment. sent8: the spiral is a kind of a specific if it is anaphoric thing that does not stigmatize hawkbit. sent9: something is a kind of a broad-bean if it is a kind of a homefolk that perplexes Jeth. sent10: there is something such that if it is a kind of a missionary that stigmatizes gastroenterology it slums. sent11: if something that is experimental is a homefolk it does excise depository. sent12: if the depository is aphanitic but it is not supernaturalist it is a friary. sent13: the depository is a lyricism if it is a nucleoplasm that stigmatizes bounder. sent14: if something does stigmatize Trilisa and it excises lodgment it is advective. sent15: if something is a rustic but it is not bumpy it is secretarial. sent16: if the toyshop is colorectal and it is woody then it is unchaste. sent17: there is something such that if it is a nonexistence that is a kind of a nucleoplasm it is xenogeneic. sent18: there exists something such that if it perplexes featherfoil and it does not excise phenothiazine it is abnormal. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the depository does stigmatize settee and is not a lyricism then it is not non-colorectal.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__