the mammal does not shout and is a snake.
sent1: the telomere is microsomal if that it does not ski and is not microsomal does not hold. sent2: if something is not unfavorable the fact that it is not a ankylosaur and/or it does not edge declamation does not hold. sent3: the mammal is monaural if the fact that it is not a kind of a nonattendance and it is not monaural does not hold. sent4: if there exists something such that it does edge declamation the fact that the mammal does not edge declamation and is not a snake is not true. sent5: the mammal does not shout if the telomere edges mammal and it is a ankylosaur. sent6: the mammal is eschatological. sent7: the tungstate is a craniotomy if the fact that it is not a ankylosaur and it is not a craniotomy is wrong. sent8: if there is something such that it edges declamation then that the mammal does not edges declamation but it does snake is not true. sent9: if something does not edge mammal then the fact that it does not shout and it snakes does not hold. sent10: the horseman does shout. sent11: the mammal is not unfavorable if the telomere is a dysfunction but it is not unfavorable. sent12: the fact that that the mammal does snake is not incorrect if that the mammal does not edge mammal and it is not a kind of a snake does not hold is not wrong. sent13: the telomere is a ankylosaur. sent14: if something is not a kind of a potential then it is both a dysfunction and not unfavorable. sent15: if that something is not a ankylosaur and/or it does not edge declamation is not right it does not edge mammal. sent16: if something is not a falls and it does not erase horseman that it is not a potential is correct. sent17: there exists something such that it does edge declamation. sent18: something is not a falls and does not erase horseman if it is a omniscience. sent19: something is a snake if the fact that it does not edge declamation and it is not a kind of a snake does not hold. sent20: there is something such that it is a salat. sent21: that the mammal does not edge declamation and is a kind of a snake is wrong. sent22: The mammal does edge telomere. sent23: the telomere is a kind of a potential.
sent19 -> int1: the mammal snakes if the fact that it does not edge declamation and is not a snakes is not right.; sent17 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the mammal does not edge declamation and it does not snake is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mammal is a snake.;
that the mammal does not shout and is a snake is incorrect.
sent9 -> int4: that the mammal does not shout but it is a snake is not right if it does not edge mammal.; sent15 -> int5: the mammal does not edge mammal if the fact that it is not a ankylosaur and/or it does not edge declamation is not right.; sent2 -> int6: that the mammal is not a kind of a ankylosaur or it does not edge declamation or both does not hold if it is not unfavorable.; sent14 -> int7: the telomere is a dysfunction and is not unfavorable if it is not a potential.; sent16 -> int8: if the telomere does not fall and does not erase horseman then it is not potential.; sent18 -> int9: if the telomere is a omniscience it is not a falls and it does not erase horseman.;
$hypothesis$ = the mammal does not shout and is a snake. ; $context$ = sent1: the telomere is microsomal if that it does not ski and is not microsomal does not hold. sent2: if something is not unfavorable the fact that it is not a ankylosaur and/or it does not edge declamation does not hold. sent3: the mammal is monaural if the fact that it is not a kind of a nonattendance and it is not monaural does not hold. sent4: if there exists something such that it does edge declamation the fact that the mammal does not edge declamation and is not a snake is not true. sent5: the mammal does not shout if the telomere edges mammal and it is a ankylosaur. sent6: the mammal is eschatological. sent7: the tungstate is a craniotomy if the fact that it is not a ankylosaur and it is not a craniotomy is wrong. sent8: if there is something such that it edges declamation then that the mammal does not edges declamation but it does snake is not true. sent9: if something does not edge mammal then the fact that it does not shout and it snakes does not hold. sent10: the horseman does shout. sent11: the mammal is not unfavorable if the telomere is a dysfunction but it is not unfavorable. sent12: the fact that that the mammal does snake is not incorrect if that the mammal does not edge mammal and it is not a kind of a snake does not hold is not wrong. sent13: the telomere is a ankylosaur. sent14: if something is not a kind of a potential then it is both a dysfunction and not unfavorable. sent15: if that something is not a ankylosaur and/or it does not edge declamation is not right it does not edge mammal. sent16: if something is not a falls and it does not erase horseman that it is not a potential is correct. sent17: there exists something such that it does edge declamation. sent18: something is not a falls and does not erase horseman if it is a omniscience. sent19: something is a snake if the fact that it does not edge declamation and it is not a kind of a snake does not hold. sent20: there is something such that it is a salat. sent21: that the mammal does not edge declamation and is a kind of a snake is wrong. sent22: The mammal does edge telomere. sent23: the telomere is a kind of a potential. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the mammal snakes if the fact that it does not edge declamation and is not a snakes is not right.; sent17 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the mammal does not edge declamation and it does not snake is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mammal is a snake.; __UNKNOWN__