that the fact that the Rwandan is not a kind of a process and it is not a Tahiti is not wrong does not hold.
sent1: if the sportscaster is an enough then the Rwandan is not a cheese but it is daisylike. sent2: the sportscaster does replace. sent3: if the fact that the square-rigger is successful or it is not plantar or both is wrong the Rwandan is not a gallery. sent4: that that something is not a process and it is not a Tahiti is not incorrect is not true if it is palatable. sent5: if something is a kind of a gallery it is a kind of a Tahiti. sent6: the Rwandan does not process. sent7: if the sportscaster does replace it is a kind of an enough. sent8: if the sportscaster is a abstainer then that the caddy is not a abstainer but it is a kind of a coalpit is false. sent9: if the caddy is a Tahiti then the Rwandan is both not a process and not a Tahiti. sent10: the fact that that the square-rigger is non-daisylike a abstainer is not true hold. sent11: the square-rigger is daisylike. sent12: if that the square-rigger is a abstainer is right it is daisylike. sent13: the caddy is palatable if it is a abstainer. sent14: the square-rigger is not palatable if there exists something such that that it does not cleave rule and it does not load Rwandan is incorrect. sent15: if the square-rigger does not coffin chapterhouse the fact that it is successful and/or it is not plantar is not right. sent16: the filler does not load Rwandan. sent17: that something does not coffin chapterhouse if the fact that it is a quadroon and it cleaves ventricle is incorrect hold. sent18: if something that is a coalpit is not a gallery then it is not a kind of a abstainer. sent19: if something is not a kind of a cheese but it is daisylike then it is a kind of a coalpit. sent20: if the filler does not cleave rule but it loads Rwandan the sportscaster is a abstainer. sent21: if the fact that something is not a abstainer but a coalpit is not right it is a gallery. sent22: the square-rigger is palatable if it is daisylike. sent23: the sportscaster is a abstainer if the filler does not cleave rule and does not load Rwandan.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the filler does not cleave rule and it does not load Rwandan does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not cleave rule and does not load Rwandan is not right.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the square-rigger is not palatable.; sent22 & sent11 -> int3: the square-rigger is palatable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the filler does not cleave rule and does not load Rwandan.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the sportscaster is a abstainer.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the caddy is not a kind of a abstainer and is a coalpit is false.; sent21 -> int8: if the fact that the caddy is not a abstainer but a coalpit does not hold then it is a gallery.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the caddy is a gallery.; sent5 -> int10: if the caddy is a gallery then it is a kind of a Tahiti.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the caddy is a Tahiti.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the Rwandan is not a process and not a Tahiti is false.
sent4 -> int12: if the Rwandan is palatable the fact that it is not a kind of a process and is not a Tahiti is not right.; sent18 -> int13: if the Rwandan is a coalpit and is not a gallery then it is not a abstainer.; sent19 -> int14: the Rwandan is a coalpit if it is not a cheese but daisylike.; sent7 & sent2 -> int15: that the sportscaster is a kind of an enough is true.; sent1 & int15 -> int16: the Rwandan is not a cheese but daisylike.; int14 & int16 -> int17: the Rwandan is a coalpit.; sent17 -> int18: if the fact that the square-rigger is a quadroon and it does cleave ventricle does not hold that it does not coffin chapterhouse is true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the Rwandan is not a kind of a process and it is not a Tahiti is not wrong does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sportscaster is an enough then the Rwandan is not a cheese but it is daisylike. sent2: the sportscaster does replace. sent3: if the fact that the square-rigger is successful or it is not plantar or both is wrong the Rwandan is not a gallery. sent4: that that something is not a process and it is not a Tahiti is not incorrect is not true if it is palatable. sent5: if something is a kind of a gallery it is a kind of a Tahiti. sent6: the Rwandan does not process. sent7: if the sportscaster does replace it is a kind of an enough. sent8: if the sportscaster is a abstainer then that the caddy is not a abstainer but it is a kind of a coalpit is false. sent9: if the caddy is a Tahiti then the Rwandan is both not a process and not a Tahiti. sent10: the fact that that the square-rigger is non-daisylike a abstainer is not true hold. sent11: the square-rigger is daisylike. sent12: if that the square-rigger is a abstainer is right it is daisylike. sent13: the caddy is palatable if it is a abstainer. sent14: the square-rigger is not palatable if there exists something such that that it does not cleave rule and it does not load Rwandan is incorrect. sent15: if the square-rigger does not coffin chapterhouse the fact that it is successful and/or it is not plantar is not right. sent16: the filler does not load Rwandan. sent17: that something does not coffin chapterhouse if the fact that it is a quadroon and it cleaves ventricle is incorrect hold. sent18: if something that is a coalpit is not a gallery then it is not a kind of a abstainer. sent19: if something is not a kind of a cheese but it is daisylike then it is a kind of a coalpit. sent20: if the filler does not cleave rule but it loads Rwandan the sportscaster is a abstainer. sent21: if the fact that something is not a abstainer but a coalpit is not right it is a gallery. sent22: the square-rigger is palatable if it is daisylike. sent23: the sportscaster is a abstainer if the filler does not cleave rule and does not load Rwandan. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the filler does not cleave rule and it does not load Rwandan does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not cleave rule and does not load Rwandan is not right.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the square-rigger is not palatable.; sent22 & sent11 -> int3: the square-rigger is palatable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the filler does not cleave rule and does not load Rwandan.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the sportscaster is a abstainer.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the caddy is not a kind of a abstainer and is a coalpit is false.; sent21 -> int8: if the fact that the caddy is not a abstainer but a coalpit does not hold then it is a gallery.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the caddy is a gallery.; sent5 -> int10: if the caddy is a gallery then it is a kind of a Tahiti.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the caddy is a Tahiti.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__