that the muslin does not fornicate is right.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is abranchiate and it is associative is incorrect the effigy is mucinoid. sent2: if the fact that the patch is not a kind of a mishap is right that it is abranchiate and it is associative is wrong. sent3: if the fact that that the muslin does commutate effigy and is not unholy is not true hold it is not antithyroid. sent4: the patch is not a mishap. sent5: if something does not fornicate then that that it is a kind of a mishap and it is not a ketoprofen is not incorrect is incorrect. sent6: that the effigy is not mucinoid is not incorrect if the muslin is non-antithyroid thing that fornicates. sent7: that the muslin commutates effigy but it is not unholy is false.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the muslin is non-antithyroid.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the muslin does fornicate.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the muslin is non-antithyroid but it does fornicate.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the effigy is non-mucinoid is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the patch is abranchiate and it is associative does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is abranchiate and it is not nonassociative is wrong.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the effigy is mucinoid.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the arethusa is a mishap but it is not a ketoprofen is false.
sent5 -> int8: if the fact that the arethusa does not fornicate is not incorrect the fact that it is a mishap and it is not a kind of a ketoprofen is false.;
$hypothesis$ = that the muslin does not fornicate is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is abranchiate and it is associative is incorrect the effigy is mucinoid. sent2: if the fact that the patch is not a kind of a mishap is right that it is abranchiate and it is associative is wrong. sent3: if the fact that that the muslin does commutate effigy and is not unholy is not true hold it is not antithyroid. sent4: the patch is not a mishap. sent5: if something does not fornicate then that that it is a kind of a mishap and it is not a ketoprofen is not incorrect is incorrect. sent6: that the effigy is not mucinoid is not incorrect if the muslin is non-antithyroid thing that fornicates. sent7: that the muslin commutates effigy but it is not unholy is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the muslin is non-antithyroid.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the muslin does fornicate.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the muslin is non-antithyroid but it does fornicate.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the effigy is non-mucinoid is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the patch is abranchiate and it is associative does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is abranchiate and it is not nonassociative is wrong.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the effigy is mucinoid.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__