the Salvadoran does not occur and the plastering does not occur.
sent1: if the rationalizing mother-in-law happens then the seedlessness does not occur and the neglecting Nancy does not occur. sent2: the Chianness occurs. sent3: the plastering does not occur. sent4: the Salvadoranness does not occur and the plastering does not occur if the seedlessness happens. sent5: the plastering does not occur if the seedlessness occurs. sent6: the ascending happens. sent7: the seedlessness happens if the neglecting Nancy occurs. sent8: the neglecting infantilism does not occur if the neglecting readmission does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Salvadoranness does not occur and the plastering does not occur is false if the neglecting Nancy does not occur. sent10: the rationalizing Hokan does not occur and the rationalizing mother-in-law does not occur if the undiplomaticness occurs. sent11: both the non-correlationalness and the non-leptorrhineness occurs if the rationalizing Monodontidae occurs. sent12: that the sentimentalising amphibia happens leads to the non-unreliableness. sent13: if the Peruvianness occurs the ascending does not occur. sent14: the neglecting Nancy happens. sent15: the pearl prevents the Atticness. sent16: the fact that the disembowelment happens is not wrong. sent17: if that the undiplomaticness occurs and the sedition occurs does not hold then the undiplomaticness does not occur. sent18: that both the rationalizing mother-in-law and the rationalizing Hokan happens is brought about by the diplomaticness. sent19: if the neglecting infantilism does not occur then the undiplomaticness and the sedition happens.
sent7 & sent14 -> int1: the seedlessness occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Salvadoran does not occur and the plastering does not occur is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the Salvadoran does not occur and the plastering does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rationalizing mother-in-law happens then the seedlessness does not occur and the neglecting Nancy does not occur. sent2: the Chianness occurs. sent3: the plastering does not occur. sent4: the Salvadoranness does not occur and the plastering does not occur if the seedlessness happens. sent5: the plastering does not occur if the seedlessness occurs. sent6: the ascending happens. sent7: the seedlessness happens if the neglecting Nancy occurs. sent8: the neglecting infantilism does not occur if the neglecting readmission does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Salvadoranness does not occur and the plastering does not occur is false if the neglecting Nancy does not occur. sent10: the rationalizing Hokan does not occur and the rationalizing mother-in-law does not occur if the undiplomaticness occurs. sent11: both the non-correlationalness and the non-leptorrhineness occurs if the rationalizing Monodontidae occurs. sent12: that the sentimentalising amphibia happens leads to the non-unreliableness. sent13: if the Peruvianness occurs the ascending does not occur. sent14: the neglecting Nancy happens. sent15: the pearl prevents the Atticness. sent16: the fact that the disembowelment happens is not wrong. sent17: if that the undiplomaticness occurs and the sedition occurs does not hold then the undiplomaticness does not occur. sent18: that both the rationalizing mother-in-law and the rationalizing Hokan happens is brought about by the diplomaticness. sent19: if the neglecting infantilism does not occur then the undiplomaticness and the sedition happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent14 -> int1: the seedlessness occurs.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__