the razorback is not a superego.
sent1: the embassy is a frozen but it does not theme movement. sent2: the landau is a coagulant if it does not remonstrate razorback. sent3: if something does not remonstrate hygrometer and remonstrates razorback it is a superego. sent4: The hygrometer does remonstrate landau. sent5: if something does remonstrate razorback that it does not remonstrate hygrometer and does theme movement does not hold. sent6: that the razorback does theme movement is correct. sent7: the embassy does not theme movement. sent8: something does remonstrate razorback. sent9: The Pedionomus syllogizes landau. sent10: the razorback is not a superego if the landau is a kind of a coagulant that syllogizes Pedionomus. sent11: the landau syllogizes Pedionomus. sent12: the underachiever does not theme movement if there exists something such that the fact that it does not remonstrate hygrometer and theme movement is wrong. sent13: the fact that the embassy does freeze and does theme movement does not hold if the hygrometer freeze. sent14: the landau does remonstrate hygrometer. sent15: there is something such that it remonstrates hygrometer. sent16: that the embassy is a kind of a frozen that themes movement does not hold. sent17: if something remonstrates razorback and does remonstrate hygrometer the hygrometer is a frozen.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the landau does remonstrate razorback.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the landau does remonstrate razorback and remonstrates hygrometer.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does remonstrate razorback and does remonstrate hygrometer.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the hygrometer is a frozen.;
the razorback is a kind of a superego.
sent3 -> int4: if the razorback does not remonstrate hygrometer and remonstrates razorback then that it is a superego hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the razorback is not a superego. ; $context$ = sent1: the embassy is a frozen but it does not theme movement. sent2: the landau is a coagulant if it does not remonstrate razorback. sent3: if something does not remonstrate hygrometer and remonstrates razorback it is a superego. sent4: The hygrometer does remonstrate landau. sent5: if something does remonstrate razorback that it does not remonstrate hygrometer and does theme movement does not hold. sent6: that the razorback does theme movement is correct. sent7: the embassy does not theme movement. sent8: something does remonstrate razorback. sent9: The Pedionomus syllogizes landau. sent10: the razorback is not a superego if the landau is a kind of a coagulant that syllogizes Pedionomus. sent11: the landau syllogizes Pedionomus. sent12: the underachiever does not theme movement if there exists something such that the fact that it does not remonstrate hygrometer and theme movement is wrong. sent13: the fact that the embassy does freeze and does theme movement does not hold if the hygrometer freeze. sent14: the landau does remonstrate hygrometer. sent15: there is something such that it remonstrates hygrometer. sent16: that the embassy is a kind of a frozen that themes movement does not hold. sent17: if something remonstrates razorback and does remonstrate hygrometer the hygrometer is a frozen. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the landau does remonstrate razorback.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the landau does remonstrate razorback and remonstrates hygrometer.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does remonstrate razorback and does remonstrate hygrometer.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the hygrometer is a frozen.; __UNKNOWN__