the soak happens.
sent1: the fact that the unspelling Don does not occur and the lenience occurs is incorrect if the rustling disinterested does not occur. sent2: the interplanetariness happens if that the palatine does not occur and the unspelling Chaldean does not occur is wrong. sent3: that the soak occurs is not wrong if the palatineness happens. sent4: that the palatineness but not the unspelling Chaldean happens is caused by that the lenience does not occur. sent5: that the executive happens and the crabbing happens does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the executive happens but the crabbing does not occur is false then the unspelling Chaldean occurs. sent7: the lenience does not occur if that the unspelling Don does not occur and the lenience happens is not correct. sent8: the unspelling audacity happens. sent9: the unspelling Chaldean does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the executive happens but the crabs does not occur is not true.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the unspelling Chaldean occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the executiveness but not the crabbing happens.; int3 -> int4: the executive occurs.;
that the soaking does not occur is right.
$hypothesis$ = the soak happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the unspelling Don does not occur and the lenience occurs is incorrect if the rustling disinterested does not occur. sent2: the interplanetariness happens if that the palatine does not occur and the unspelling Chaldean does not occur is wrong. sent3: that the soak occurs is not wrong if the palatineness happens. sent4: that the palatineness but not the unspelling Chaldean happens is caused by that the lenience does not occur. sent5: that the executive happens and the crabbing happens does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the executive happens but the crabbing does not occur is false then the unspelling Chaldean occurs. sent7: the lenience does not occur if that the unspelling Don does not occur and the lenience happens is not correct. sent8: the unspelling audacity happens. sent9: the unspelling Chaldean does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the executive happens but the crabs does not occur is not true.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the unspelling Chaldean occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the executiveness but not the crabbing happens.; int3 -> int4: the executive occurs.; __UNKNOWN__