that the snuffer does stud meekness hold.
sent1: if that the lamppost is not a hagberry and studs meekness does not hold then the discus studs meekness. sent2: the lamppost nests Postimpressionist and is violable. sent3: the discus is a Ventner. sent4: the snuffer is a hagberry. sent5: if something that gallivants is viviparous it does not stud meekness. sent6: if the fact that the snuffer does not gallivant and is a kind of a simian is wrong the discus is simian. sent7: the fact that the porkpie does not stud meekness and is a kind of a bottle is false. sent8: the snuffer neglects Mossbauer. sent9: the fact that the blink is violable hold. sent10: something is viviparous if it is a hagberry. sent11: that the porkpie is a kind of nascent thing that is simian is wrong if something is nascent. sent12: if that the lamppost does not stud centiliter and is a hagberry is wrong then the discus is a kind of a hagberry. sent13: the spider studs meekness. sent14: that the snuffer spring-cleans is not false. sent15: the lamppost is not a kind of a simian. sent16: if something does ejaculate it is bohemian. sent17: the porkpie is violable. sent18: the fact that the snuffer does not gallivant is correct. sent19: if the fact that the lamppost does not stud centiliter and is viviparous is not correct that the discus is not viviparous hold. sent20: that something does stud centiliter hold. sent21: that the tracheid is a catastrophe is not false. sent22: the discus is not inviolable if it studs spider. sent23: there exists something such that it does bottle. sent24: the snuffer is not simian and it does not stud meekness if the discus does not stud meekness. sent25: if there is something such that it does stud centiliter that the lamppost does not stud centiliter and is a hagberry is not true. sent26: that the porkpie is nascent is right. sent27: the discus does not stud centiliter and is not viviparous if the lamppost is viviparous. sent28: the porkpie is not a kind of a simian if it is a hagberry and violable. sent29: if something is violable and nascent then the discus does gallivant.
sent17 & sent26 -> int1: the porkpie is both violable and nascent.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of violable thing that is nascent.; int2 & sent29 -> int3: the discus gallivants.; sent10 -> int4: the discus is viviparous if it is a hagberry.; sent20 & sent25 -> int5: that that the lamppost does not stud centiliter but it is a hagberry does not hold hold.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the discus is a kind of a hagberry.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the discus is viviparous.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the discus gallivants and is viviparous.; sent5 -> int9: if the fact that the discus does gallivant and is viviparous is not incorrect then it does not stud meekness.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the discus does not stud meekness is not incorrect.; int10 & sent24 -> int11: the snuffer is not simian and does not stud meekness.; int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the snuffer does stud meekness hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the lamppost is not a hagberry and studs meekness does not hold then the discus studs meekness. sent2: the lamppost nests Postimpressionist and is violable. sent3: the discus is a Ventner. sent4: the snuffer is a hagberry. sent5: if something that gallivants is viviparous it does not stud meekness. sent6: if the fact that the snuffer does not gallivant and is a kind of a simian is wrong the discus is simian. sent7: the fact that the porkpie does not stud meekness and is a kind of a bottle is false. sent8: the snuffer neglects Mossbauer. sent9: the fact that the blink is violable hold. sent10: something is viviparous if it is a hagberry. sent11: that the porkpie is a kind of nascent thing that is simian is wrong if something is nascent. sent12: if that the lamppost does not stud centiliter and is a hagberry is wrong then the discus is a kind of a hagberry. sent13: the spider studs meekness. sent14: that the snuffer spring-cleans is not false. sent15: the lamppost is not a kind of a simian. sent16: if something does ejaculate it is bohemian. sent17: the porkpie is violable. sent18: the fact that the snuffer does not gallivant is correct. sent19: if the fact that the lamppost does not stud centiliter and is viviparous is not correct that the discus is not viviparous hold. sent20: that something does stud centiliter hold. sent21: that the tracheid is a catastrophe is not false. sent22: the discus is not inviolable if it studs spider. sent23: there exists something such that it does bottle. sent24: the snuffer is not simian and it does not stud meekness if the discus does not stud meekness. sent25: if there is something such that it does stud centiliter that the lamppost does not stud centiliter and is a hagberry is not true. sent26: that the porkpie is nascent is right. sent27: the discus does not stud centiliter and is not viviparous if the lamppost is viviparous. sent28: the porkpie is not a kind of a simian if it is a hagberry and violable. sent29: if something is violable and nascent then the discus does gallivant. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent26 -> int1: the porkpie is both violable and nascent.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of violable thing that is nascent.; int2 & sent29 -> int3: the discus gallivants.; sent10 -> int4: the discus is viviparous if it is a hagberry.; sent20 & sent25 -> int5: that that the lamppost does not stud centiliter but it is a hagberry does not hold hold.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the discus is a kind of a hagberry.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the discus is viviparous.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the discus gallivants and is viviparous.; sent5 -> int9: if the fact that the discus does gallivant and is viviparous is not incorrect then it does not stud meekness.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the discus does not stud meekness is not incorrect.; int10 & sent24 -> int11: the snuffer is not simian and does not stud meekness.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__