the compression occurs.
sent1: the fact that not the compositeness but the fartlek happens does not hold if that the insulating occurs is not wrong. sent2: the disrupting does not occur. sent3: that the mutableness occurs is prevented by that the communion happens and the composite occurs. sent4: the insulating happens if the prolonging occurs. sent5: the Celticness occurs. sent6: the fartlek brings about that the communion occurs. sent7: that the compression happens is prevented by that the fartlek does not occur and the communion does not occur. sent8: the mutableness occurs if the insulating does not occur. sent9: that the compression happens is caused by the kissing. sent10: that the fartlek occurs is right. sent11: the compression does not occur if the communion does not occur and the fartlek does not occur. sent12: that the prolonging does not occur is prevented by the enskying Rhamnaceae. sent13: if the antiferromagneticness does not occur not the kissing but the disrupting occurs. sent14: both the non-botanicness and the non-eponymousness occurs. sent15: the insulating does not occur and the disrupting does not occur.
sent6 & sent10 -> int1: the communion happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the compositeness occurs is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the communion and the composite occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the mutableness does not occur.; sent15 -> int4: the insulating does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the mutableness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the compositeness does not occur.;
the compression does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the compression occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the compositeness but the fartlek happens does not hold if that the insulating occurs is not wrong. sent2: the disrupting does not occur. sent3: that the mutableness occurs is prevented by that the communion happens and the composite occurs. sent4: the insulating happens if the prolonging occurs. sent5: the Celticness occurs. sent6: the fartlek brings about that the communion occurs. sent7: that the compression happens is prevented by that the fartlek does not occur and the communion does not occur. sent8: the mutableness occurs if the insulating does not occur. sent9: that the compression happens is caused by the kissing. sent10: that the fartlek occurs is right. sent11: the compression does not occur if the communion does not occur and the fartlek does not occur. sent12: that the prolonging does not occur is prevented by the enskying Rhamnaceae. sent13: if the antiferromagneticness does not occur not the kissing but the disrupting occurs. sent14: both the non-botanicness and the non-eponymousness occurs. sent15: the insulating does not occur and the disrupting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent10 -> int1: the communion happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the compositeness occurs is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the communion and the composite occurs.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the mutableness does not occur.; sent15 -> int4: the insulating does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the mutableness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the compositeness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__