the preterist is a mephobarbital or does flick agglutinogen or both.
sent1: if something is a kind of a galley then it is closed. sent2: the corneum is a subordinating. sent3: the obstruction is not a kind of a houseroom and is not autodidactic. sent4: the fact that the Donatist is a kind of non-carpetbag thing that is not a subordinating is false if the yield does not grow. sent5: if the Donatist does swim then the preterist is a mephobarbital. sent6: if the stonecrop is not a kind of a houseroom the fact that the hypotensive is not light-duty but it swims is not right. sent7: if that something is a carpetbag and is not a galley does not hold then it is a galley. sent8: the Donatist is a kind of a subordinating if the president does subordinating. sent9: the fact that the president is a subordinating hold if it is a kind of a galley. sent10: that the encyclical does flick agglutinogen is not false. sent11: the preterist does flick agglutinogen and/or it is subordinating. sent12: the stonecrop is not a kind of a houseroom if the obstruction is not a houseroom and is not autodidactic. sent13: the president is a kind of a galley that is a carpetbag. sent14: if the encyclical does not subordinate then that that it is a carpetbag and it is not a kind of a galley is right is false. sent15: the fact that the Donatist either does not grow or does not subordinate or both is incorrect if the president subordinate.
sent13 -> int1: the president is a kind of a galley.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the president subordinates.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: that the Donatist either does not grow or is not a subordinating or both is wrong.;
the fact that the preterist is a mephobarbital or it does flick agglutinogen or both is not true.
sent12 & sent3 -> int4: the stonecrop is not a houseroom.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the hypotensive is a kind of non-light-duty thing that does swim is not correct.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not light-duty and it does swim is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the preterist is a mephobarbital or does flick agglutinogen or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a galley then it is closed. sent2: the corneum is a subordinating. sent3: the obstruction is not a kind of a houseroom and is not autodidactic. sent4: the fact that the Donatist is a kind of non-carpetbag thing that is not a subordinating is false if the yield does not grow. sent5: if the Donatist does swim then the preterist is a mephobarbital. sent6: if the stonecrop is not a kind of a houseroom the fact that the hypotensive is not light-duty but it swims is not right. sent7: if that something is a carpetbag and is not a galley does not hold then it is a galley. sent8: the Donatist is a kind of a subordinating if the president does subordinating. sent9: the fact that the president is a subordinating hold if it is a kind of a galley. sent10: that the encyclical does flick agglutinogen is not false. sent11: the preterist does flick agglutinogen and/or it is subordinating. sent12: the stonecrop is not a kind of a houseroom if the obstruction is not a houseroom and is not autodidactic. sent13: the president is a kind of a galley that is a carpetbag. sent14: if the encyclical does not subordinate then that that it is a carpetbag and it is not a kind of a galley is right is false. sent15: the fact that the Donatist either does not grow or does not subordinate or both is incorrect if the president subordinate. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the president is a kind of a galley.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the president subordinates.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: that the Donatist either does not grow or is not a subordinating or both is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__