the flour is not seasonable and is not minty.
sent1: the focalization is not a thalamus. sent2: the focalization is minty if it is a kind of a ribbonwood and it squeegees Crocodylus. sent3: if something is not a crud it powwows Aras and is unrentable. sent4: the focalization is not a ribbonwood but it squeegees Crocodylus if the webworm does powwow Aras. sent5: The Aras powwows webworm. sent6: the fact that the webworm is not dogmatic and it is not styleless is not true if the focalization is not a kind of a thalamus. sent7: the webworm powwows Aras. sent8: if something that is not a ribbonwood squeegees Crocodylus then it is not non-minty. sent9: something that powwows Aras is not seasonable and is not minty. sent10: if the fact that something is both not dogmatic and not styleless is false it is styleless. sent11: if the fact that the focalization is minty is true then the fact that the flour is not seasonable and not minty does not hold.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the focalization is not a ribbonwood and squeegees Crocodylus.; sent8 -> int2: if the focalization is not a kind of a ribbonwood but it squeegees Crocodylus it is minty.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the focalization is minty.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the flour is not seasonable and it is not minty.
sent9 -> int4: the flour is not seasonable and it is not minty if it does powwow Aras.; sent3 -> int5: the flour powwows Aras and it is unrentable if it is not a crud.; sent10 -> int6: if the fact that the webworm is not dogmatic and not styleless is not correct it is styleless.; sent6 & sent1 -> int7: that the webworm is both not dogmatic and not styleless is incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the webworm is styleless.; int8 -> int9: something is styleless.;
$hypothesis$ = the flour is not seasonable and is not minty. ; $context$ = sent1: the focalization is not a thalamus. sent2: the focalization is minty if it is a kind of a ribbonwood and it squeegees Crocodylus. sent3: if something is not a crud it powwows Aras and is unrentable. sent4: the focalization is not a ribbonwood but it squeegees Crocodylus if the webworm does powwow Aras. sent5: The Aras powwows webworm. sent6: the fact that the webworm is not dogmatic and it is not styleless is not true if the focalization is not a kind of a thalamus. sent7: the webworm powwows Aras. sent8: if something that is not a ribbonwood squeegees Crocodylus then it is not non-minty. sent9: something that powwows Aras is not seasonable and is not minty. sent10: if the fact that something is both not dogmatic and not styleless is false it is styleless. sent11: if the fact that the focalization is minty is true then the fact that the flour is not seasonable and not minty does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the focalization is not a ribbonwood and squeegees Crocodylus.; sent8 -> int2: if the focalization is not a kind of a ribbonwood but it squeegees Crocodylus it is minty.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the focalization is minty.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__