the unrenewableness does not occur.
sent1: that the worst does not occur is prevented by that the batten does not occur and the degeneration occurs. sent2: that the stultification does not occur yields that the mythicness does not occur. sent3: the newspeak does not occur. sent4: if the civilian does not occur then both the non-regimentalness and the non-introspectiveness occurs. sent5: the beanball does not occur if the fact that the stultification and the non-mythicness happens is false. sent6: the defoliating pylon happens if the stultification occurs. sent7: that the misfire occurs is prevented by either that the steering does not occur or that the glomming parhelion happens or both. sent8: that the steering does not occur and/or that the glomming parhelion occurs is brought about by the non-regimentalness. sent9: the mythicness happens. sent10: that the defoliating pylon occurs but the newspeak does not occur prevents that the unrenewableness occurs. sent11: that the catapulticness happens results in the fact that that the battening does not occur but the degeneration happens is correct. sent12: if the defoliating pylon does not occur the fact that the stultification but not the mythicness occurs does not hold. sent13: if the runaway occurs the catapulticness occurs. sent14: if the worsting happens the unrenewableness happens. sent15: the runaway occurs if the preoccupation occurs. sent16: the preoccupation and the non-uncriticalness occurs if the misfiring does not occur. sent17: the degeneration does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stultification does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the mythicness does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the stultification happens.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the defoliating pylon occurs.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the defoliating pylon occurs but the newspeak does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the beanball does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the unrenewableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the worst does not occur is prevented by that the batten does not occur and the degeneration occurs. sent2: that the stultification does not occur yields that the mythicness does not occur. sent3: the newspeak does not occur. sent4: if the civilian does not occur then both the non-regimentalness and the non-introspectiveness occurs. sent5: the beanball does not occur if the fact that the stultification and the non-mythicness happens is false. sent6: the defoliating pylon happens if the stultification occurs. sent7: that the misfire occurs is prevented by either that the steering does not occur or that the glomming parhelion happens or both. sent8: that the steering does not occur and/or that the glomming parhelion occurs is brought about by the non-regimentalness. sent9: the mythicness happens. sent10: that the defoliating pylon occurs but the newspeak does not occur prevents that the unrenewableness occurs. sent11: that the catapulticness happens results in the fact that that the battening does not occur but the degeneration happens is correct. sent12: if the defoliating pylon does not occur the fact that the stultification but not the mythicness occurs does not hold. sent13: if the runaway occurs the catapulticness occurs. sent14: if the worsting happens the unrenewableness happens. sent15: the runaway occurs if the preoccupation occurs. sent16: the preoccupation and the non-uncriticalness occurs if the misfiring does not occur. sent17: the degeneration does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stultification does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the mythicness does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the stultification happens.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the defoliating pylon occurs.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the defoliating pylon occurs but the newspeak does not occur.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__