that the archdeacon is an anthrax and it subtilizes is not correct.
sent1: the moviegoer does subtilize and it is xenogeneic. sent2: there is something such that the fact that that it is not a chop and it is sarcastic is not incorrect is not true. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does hypnotize poolroom and it is a kind of a extraneousness is wrong then the archdeacon is not a extraneousness. sent4: the archdeacon hypnotizes whippersnapper if the shoring is an anthrax. sent5: the shoring is a flush if the proctologist is not a extraneousness. sent6: if the fact that something does not hypnotize whippersnapper and is not an anthrax is wrong it does hypnotize whippersnapper. sent7: the proctologist is not a extraneousness if the fact that the merlon is a kind of an inaugural and hypnotizes poolroom is false. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a chop but sarcastic is not correct then the heteroploid does not pin scenarist. sent9: if something is a flush it does hypnotize whippersnapper and is not an anthrax. sent10: if the merlon is not a kind of an inaugural that the proctologist hypnotizes poolroom and is a kind of a extraneousness is not true. sent11: the erection hypnotizes whippersnapper. sent12: that if that the shoring does hypnotize whippersnapper is right then the archdeacon does subtilize is true. sent13: that the runch does not hypnotize whippersnapper and it is not an anthrax is false if the shoring does not subtilize. sent14: the fact that something does flush and it subtilizes does not hold if the fact that it is not a extraneousness hold. sent15: the shoring does hypnotize whippersnapper. sent16: the merlon is not inaugural if it is not a kind of a chop and it does not pin scenarist. sent17: the archdeacon is an anthrax. sent18: The whippersnapper does hypnotize shoring. sent19: the shoring is a subthalamus and it is Jain.
sent12 & sent15 -> int1: the archdeacon subtilizes.; int1 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the archdeacon is an anthrax and it does subtilize hold is wrong.
sent9 -> int2: if the shoring does flush then it does hypnotize whippersnapper and is not an anthrax.; sent2 & sent8 -> int3: the heteroploid does not pin scenarist.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does not pin scenarist.;
$hypothesis$ = that the archdeacon is an anthrax and it subtilizes is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the moviegoer does subtilize and it is xenogeneic. sent2: there is something such that the fact that that it is not a chop and it is sarcastic is not incorrect is not true. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does hypnotize poolroom and it is a kind of a extraneousness is wrong then the archdeacon is not a extraneousness. sent4: the archdeacon hypnotizes whippersnapper if the shoring is an anthrax. sent5: the shoring is a flush if the proctologist is not a extraneousness. sent6: if the fact that something does not hypnotize whippersnapper and is not an anthrax is wrong it does hypnotize whippersnapper. sent7: the proctologist is not a extraneousness if the fact that the merlon is a kind of an inaugural and hypnotizes poolroom is false. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a chop but sarcastic is not correct then the heteroploid does not pin scenarist. sent9: if something is a flush it does hypnotize whippersnapper and is not an anthrax. sent10: if the merlon is not a kind of an inaugural that the proctologist hypnotizes poolroom and is a kind of a extraneousness is not true. sent11: the erection hypnotizes whippersnapper. sent12: that if that the shoring does hypnotize whippersnapper is right then the archdeacon does subtilize is true. sent13: that the runch does not hypnotize whippersnapper and it is not an anthrax is false if the shoring does not subtilize. sent14: the fact that something does flush and it subtilizes does not hold if the fact that it is not a extraneousness hold. sent15: the shoring does hypnotize whippersnapper. sent16: the merlon is not inaugural if it is not a kind of a chop and it does not pin scenarist. sent17: the archdeacon is an anthrax. sent18: The whippersnapper does hypnotize shoring. sent19: the shoring is a subthalamus and it is Jain. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent15 -> int1: the archdeacon subtilizes.; int1 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__