the faience is nonfatal.
sent1: the field is sufficient. sent2: the bagpipe is a cycle if there is something such that it is telocentric and it is not an unwillingness. sent3: if the stylus is not sufficient the pacesetter is not a kind of a cycle. sent4: the pacesetter is not a kind of a cycle if the Illinoisan does not cycle and is not an unwillingness. sent5: the pacesetter is non-Brobdingnagian. sent6: the rarity is nonfatal. sent7: if there exists something such that it is telocentric or it is a kind of an unwillingness or both the faience is nonfatal. sent8: the Illinoisan is not a cycle and not an unwillingness if it is not telocentric. sent9: if something is nonfatal and/or is sufficient then the faience does fasten. sent10: if the stylus is eligible it is not sufficient. sent11: if something does not outshout conferrer it is a replication and/or it is a kind of a smoke. sent12: if the fact that the stylus does not fasten and is not eligible is not true then it is not sufficient. sent13: if something networks monocarp it is not telocentric. sent14: the fact that the stylus does not fasten and is ineligible is not right. sent15: the pacesetter is not a Chamaecytisus. sent16: the fact that the stylus does not fasten but it is eligible does not hold. sent17: the pacesetter is not punctual. sent18: that that the stylus is not orthodox and is sufficient is true is incorrect if that the pacesetter is not a cycle is not false. sent19: if the stylus is not sufficient then the pacesetter is sufficient and it is not a kind of a cycle. sent20: the pacesetter is orthodox and fastens. sent21: the pacesetter is not eligible.
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: that the stylus is not sufficient is correct.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the pacesetter is not sufficient and it is not a cycle.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the pacesetter is not sufficient is not wrong.;
the faience is not nonfatal.
sent13 -> int4: if the Illinoisan does network monocarp then it is not telocentric.; sent11 -> int5: the batiste is a kind of a replication and/or does smoke if it does not outshout conferrer.;
$hypothesis$ = the faience is nonfatal. ; $context$ = sent1: the field is sufficient. sent2: the bagpipe is a cycle if there is something such that it is telocentric and it is not an unwillingness. sent3: if the stylus is not sufficient the pacesetter is not a kind of a cycle. sent4: the pacesetter is not a kind of a cycle if the Illinoisan does not cycle and is not an unwillingness. sent5: the pacesetter is non-Brobdingnagian. sent6: the rarity is nonfatal. sent7: if there exists something such that it is telocentric or it is a kind of an unwillingness or both the faience is nonfatal. sent8: the Illinoisan is not a cycle and not an unwillingness if it is not telocentric. sent9: if something is nonfatal and/or is sufficient then the faience does fasten. sent10: if the stylus is eligible it is not sufficient. sent11: if something does not outshout conferrer it is a replication and/or it is a kind of a smoke. sent12: if the fact that the stylus does not fasten and is not eligible is not true then it is not sufficient. sent13: if something networks monocarp it is not telocentric. sent14: the fact that the stylus does not fasten and is ineligible is not right. sent15: the pacesetter is not a Chamaecytisus. sent16: the fact that the stylus does not fasten but it is eligible does not hold. sent17: the pacesetter is not punctual. sent18: that that the stylus is not orthodox and is sufficient is true is incorrect if that the pacesetter is not a cycle is not false. sent19: if the stylus is not sufficient then the pacesetter is sufficient and it is not a kind of a cycle. sent20: the pacesetter is orthodox and fastens. sent21: the pacesetter is not eligible. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: that the stylus is not sufficient is correct.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the pacesetter is not sufficient and it is not a cycle.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the pacesetter is not sufficient is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__