there exists something such that it is regenerating and it is not paramedical.
sent1: if the streptococcus does not carjack Demeter the bravo is unwholesome but it is not a legibility. sent2: the fact that something is noninvasive thing that does not carjack Demeter does not hold if it is not paramedical. sent3: the poultryman is not invasive if the bravo does not carjack Demeter. sent4: something is not unsent. sent5: the fact that the streptococcus is unwholesome is right. sent6: the doorplate is a kind of a Swinburne and it is a Granth. sent7: the bravo is ahistorical if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-invasive thing that does not carjack Demeter is not true. sent8: if there exists something such that either it does not regenerate or it is not paramedical or both the fact that the streptococcus is not paramedical is true. sent9: the streptococcus is a legibility and/or it is not unwholesome if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a legibility is correct. sent10: the poultryman is not regenerating or not paramedical or both if there exists something such that it segregates lev. sent11: the doorplate does regenerate and/or it does not carjack Demeter. sent12: if the bravo does carjack Demeter the fact that the streptococcus is a legibility and/or is not unwholesome does not hold. sent13: if the doorplate is a Swinburne it segregates lev. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a legibility is right. sent15: if the bravo is a legibility that the doorplate is paramedical or it does not carjack Demeter or both is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bravo does carjack Demeter.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the streptococcus is a kind of a legibility and/or it is not unwholesome is wrong.; sent14 & sent9 -> int2: the streptococcus is a kind of a legibility or is not unwholesome or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bravo does not carjack Demeter.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the poultryman is not invasive.;
there exists something such that it is ahistorical.
sent2 -> int6: the fact that the streptococcus is not invasive and it does not carjack Demeter is not right if it is not paramedical.; sent6 -> int7: the doorplate is a Swinburne.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the doorplate does segregate lev.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does segregate lev hold.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the poultryman is non-regenerating and/or non-paramedical.; int10 -> int11: something is not regenerating or not paramedical or both.; int11 & sent8 -> int12: the streptococcus is not paramedical.; int6 & int12 -> int13: that that that the streptococcus is a kind of noninvasive thing that does not carjack Demeter is true does not hold is not false.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that that it is not invasive and it does not carjack Demeter is false.; int14 & sent7 -> int15: the bravo is ahistorical.; int15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is regenerating and it is not paramedical. ; $context$ = sent1: if the streptococcus does not carjack Demeter the bravo is unwholesome but it is not a legibility. sent2: the fact that something is noninvasive thing that does not carjack Demeter does not hold if it is not paramedical. sent3: the poultryman is not invasive if the bravo does not carjack Demeter. sent4: something is not unsent. sent5: the fact that the streptococcus is unwholesome is right. sent6: the doorplate is a kind of a Swinburne and it is a Granth. sent7: the bravo is ahistorical if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-invasive thing that does not carjack Demeter is not true. sent8: if there exists something such that either it does not regenerate or it is not paramedical or both the fact that the streptococcus is not paramedical is true. sent9: the streptococcus is a legibility and/or it is not unwholesome if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a legibility is correct. sent10: the poultryman is not regenerating or not paramedical or both if there exists something such that it segregates lev. sent11: the doorplate does regenerate and/or it does not carjack Demeter. sent12: if the bravo does carjack Demeter the fact that the streptococcus is a legibility and/or is not unwholesome does not hold. sent13: if the doorplate is a Swinburne it segregates lev. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a legibility is right. sent15: if the bravo is a legibility that the doorplate is paramedical or it does not carjack Demeter or both is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bravo does carjack Demeter.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the streptococcus is a kind of a legibility and/or it is not unwholesome is wrong.; sent14 & sent9 -> int2: the streptococcus is a kind of a legibility or is not unwholesome or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bravo does not carjack Demeter.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the poultryman is not invasive.; __UNKNOWN__