that the homework but not the walk-through happens does not hold.
sent1: the overloading does not occur and/or the exteroceptiveness does not occur if the wintriness does not occur. sent2: if the overloading does not occur the foaling FTC and the invisibleness occurs. sent3: if the decoying sunshine happens then the sterilizing fogged does not occur. sent4: that the homework and the walk-through happens is not right. sent5: the invisibleness is triggered by that the overload does not occur. sent6: the decoying Centrocercus happens. sent7: if the foaling FTC occurs the sterilizing fogged occurs. sent8: that the homework happens is not incorrect if the venting Godard does not occur but the arrangement occurs. sent9: that the walk-through happens is prevented by the sterilizing fogged and/or that the decoying sunshine happens. sent10: the overload does not occur. sent11: the fact that the homework occurs and the walk-through occurs does not hold if the venting Godard does not occur. sent12: the wintriness happens and/or the wiping happens. sent13: the Palladianness occurs. sent14: the syllabication happens. sent15: the arrangement happens if the venting Godard occurs. sent16: both the foaling FTC and the decoying sunshine happens if the disengaging does not occur. sent17: the invisibleness happens. sent18: that the bloomers and/or the zygomorphicness happens is not false. sent19: the wintriness does not occur if the fact that the non-prosthodonticsness and the wintriness occurs is false. sent20: the fact that the flirting happens but the benefiting does not occur is not correct if the endothelialness does not occur. sent21: if the arrangement happens or the decoying sunshine happens or both the sterilizing fogged does not occur. sent22: if the lacteal does not occur the fact that the stooging happens but the Palladianness does not occur is not correct. sent23: that the invisibleness occurs is triggered by that the overload does not occur or that the exteroceptiveness does not occur or both. sent24: that both the non-prosthodonticsness and the wintriness occurs is not correct if the foaling Vanellus does not occur. sent25: that the foaling Vanellus occurs is prevented by that the Palladianness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the venting Godard occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the arrangement occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the arrangement happens or the decoying sunshine happens or both.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the sterilizing fogged does not occur.; sent2 & sent10 -> int4: the foaling FTC and the invisibleness happens.; int4 -> int5: the foaling FTC occurs.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the sterilizing fogged occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the venting Godard does not occur.;
the homework but not the walk-through occurs.
sent25 & sent13 -> int9: the foaling Vanellus does not occur.; sent24 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the prosthodonticsness does not occur and the wintriness happens does not hold.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the wintriness does not occur is not wrong.; sent1 & int11 -> int12: the overloading does not occur or the exteroceptiveness does not occur or both.; sent23 & int12 -> int13: the invisibleness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = that the homework but not the walk-through happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the overloading does not occur and/or the exteroceptiveness does not occur if the wintriness does not occur. sent2: if the overloading does not occur the foaling FTC and the invisibleness occurs. sent3: if the decoying sunshine happens then the sterilizing fogged does not occur. sent4: that the homework and the walk-through happens is not right. sent5: the invisibleness is triggered by that the overload does not occur. sent6: the decoying Centrocercus happens. sent7: if the foaling FTC occurs the sterilizing fogged occurs. sent8: that the homework happens is not incorrect if the venting Godard does not occur but the arrangement occurs. sent9: that the walk-through happens is prevented by the sterilizing fogged and/or that the decoying sunshine happens. sent10: the overload does not occur. sent11: the fact that the homework occurs and the walk-through occurs does not hold if the venting Godard does not occur. sent12: the wintriness happens and/or the wiping happens. sent13: the Palladianness occurs. sent14: the syllabication happens. sent15: the arrangement happens if the venting Godard occurs. sent16: both the foaling FTC and the decoying sunshine happens if the disengaging does not occur. sent17: the invisibleness happens. sent18: that the bloomers and/or the zygomorphicness happens is not false. sent19: the wintriness does not occur if the fact that the non-prosthodonticsness and the wintriness occurs is false. sent20: the fact that the flirting happens but the benefiting does not occur is not correct if the endothelialness does not occur. sent21: if the arrangement happens or the decoying sunshine happens or both the sterilizing fogged does not occur. sent22: if the lacteal does not occur the fact that the stooging happens but the Palladianness does not occur is not correct. sent23: that the invisibleness occurs is triggered by that the overload does not occur or that the exteroceptiveness does not occur or both. sent24: that both the non-prosthodonticsness and the wintriness occurs is not correct if the foaling Vanellus does not occur. sent25: that the foaling Vanellus occurs is prevented by that the Palladianness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the venting Godard occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the arrangement occurs.; int1 -> int2: either the arrangement happens or the decoying sunshine happens or both.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the sterilizing fogged does not occur.; sent2 & sent10 -> int4: the foaling FTC and the invisibleness happens.; int4 -> int5: the foaling FTC occurs.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the sterilizing fogged occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the venting Godard does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__