that the raving does not occur and the peekaboo occurs hold.
sent1: the casketing Plataleidae happens. sent2: that the multiplying Blimp does not occur but the macaronicness occurs is not true. sent3: the fact that the multiplying sunburst happens is correct. sent4: the nebulousness happens. sent5: if the nebulousness does not occur then the fact that not the raving but the peekaboo happens is wrong. sent6: if that the fact that not the multiplying Blimp but the macaronicness occurs is incorrect is not wrong then the casketing Mysore does not occur. sent7: the eukaryoticness does not occur. sent8: both the pedagogicalness and the gleaming occurs. sent9: both the Laosness and the revolution happens. sent10: if the nebulousness happens then the fact that the asking infestation occurs is right. sent11: the fact that the pursuit happens hold. sent12: that the apologizing happens is triggered by that the unmownness occurs. sent13: the Laosness does not occur if the undertaking and the asking infestation occurs. sent14: if the castration does not occur the nutation happens. sent15: the drifting occurs. sent16: the cryonicness does not occur and the casketing Luke does not occur. sent17: the rave does not occur if the undertaking does not occur and the casketing Mysore does not occur. sent18: if the myalgicness does not occur both the peekaboo and the unfolding happens. sent19: that the multiplying saddlebag happens and the cryonicness happens is not correct. sent20: the complaining and the consonantalness happens. sent21: the faucalness does not occur. sent22: the myalgicness does not occur. sent23: the asking phoebe and the muckraking occurs. sent24: that the explicableness happens is prevented by that the demoralization occurs.
sent10 & sent4 -> int1: the asking infestation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undertaking happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the undertaking and the asking infestation occurs.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the Laosness does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: the Laos occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the undertaking does not occur.; sent6 & sent2 -> int7: the casketing Mysore does not occur.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the undertaking does not occur and the casketing Mysore does not occur.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the raving does not occur.; sent18 & sent22 -> int10: the peekaboo and the unfolding occurs.; int10 -> int11: the peekaboo happens.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rave does not occur and the peekaboo happens is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the raving does not occur and the peekaboo occurs hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the casketing Plataleidae happens. sent2: that the multiplying Blimp does not occur but the macaronicness occurs is not true. sent3: the fact that the multiplying sunburst happens is correct. sent4: the nebulousness happens. sent5: if the nebulousness does not occur then the fact that not the raving but the peekaboo happens is wrong. sent6: if that the fact that not the multiplying Blimp but the macaronicness occurs is incorrect is not wrong then the casketing Mysore does not occur. sent7: the eukaryoticness does not occur. sent8: both the pedagogicalness and the gleaming occurs. sent9: both the Laosness and the revolution happens. sent10: if the nebulousness happens then the fact that the asking infestation occurs is right. sent11: the fact that the pursuit happens hold. sent12: that the apologizing happens is triggered by that the unmownness occurs. sent13: the Laosness does not occur if the undertaking and the asking infestation occurs. sent14: if the castration does not occur the nutation happens. sent15: the drifting occurs. sent16: the cryonicness does not occur and the casketing Luke does not occur. sent17: the rave does not occur if the undertaking does not occur and the casketing Mysore does not occur. sent18: if the myalgicness does not occur both the peekaboo and the unfolding happens. sent19: that the multiplying saddlebag happens and the cryonicness happens is not correct. sent20: the complaining and the consonantalness happens. sent21: the faucalness does not occur. sent22: the myalgicness does not occur. sent23: the asking phoebe and the muckraking occurs. sent24: that the explicableness happens is prevented by that the demoralization occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent4 -> int1: the asking infestation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undertaking happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the undertaking and the asking infestation occurs.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the Laosness does not occur.; sent9 -> int4: the Laos occurs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the undertaking does not occur.; sent6 & sent2 -> int7: the casketing Mysore does not occur.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the undertaking does not occur and the casketing Mysore does not occur.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the raving does not occur.; sent18 & sent22 -> int10: the peekaboo and the unfolding occurs.; int10 -> int11: the peekaboo happens.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__