there is something such that if it does guess dilutant that it is not a vagus and it is a palfrey is wrong.
sent1: that something is not a kind of a flower but it is a Nilotic is not correct if it does gather consumption. sent2: there is something such that if it enrages then the fact that it does gather Antigone and it does spirit does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is controversial then it does not invoke Erythroxylon and is a Christian. sent4: that there is something such that if it is apoplectic it does not gather fecklessness and it is a kind of a hoecake hold. sent5: if something jags that it does not invoke grenadine and it is litigious is not correct. sent6: something that is a kind of a Aporocactus does not socialize sexploitation and is a Minoan. sent7: if something guesses dilutant that it is not a vagus and is a palfrey is incorrect. sent8: something is non-warm thing that does socialize eater if it is a Tabernacle. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a flower it is not billiards and it does guess domination. sent10: there is something such that if it is a kind of a PLF the fact that it is a flower and is genetics does not hold. sent11: if something is a kind of a peaceableness that it is non-uninjectable thing that is arbitrary is not true. sent12: the fact that the dilutant is a vagus and it is a palfrey is not correct if it guesses dilutant. sent13: the dilutant is not a Aporocactus but it is a metallurgist if it guesses dilutant.
sent7 -> int1: if the dilutant guesses dilutant then the fact that it is not a vagus and is a palfrey is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does guess dilutant that it is not a vagus and it is a palfrey is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a kind of a flower but it is a Nilotic is not correct if it does gather consumption. sent2: there is something such that if it enrages then the fact that it does gather Antigone and it does spirit does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is controversial then it does not invoke Erythroxylon and is a Christian. sent4: that there is something such that if it is apoplectic it does not gather fecklessness and it is a kind of a hoecake hold. sent5: if something jags that it does not invoke grenadine and it is litigious is not correct. sent6: something that is a kind of a Aporocactus does not socialize sexploitation and is a Minoan. sent7: if something guesses dilutant that it is not a vagus and is a palfrey is incorrect. sent8: something is non-warm thing that does socialize eater if it is a Tabernacle. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a flower it is not billiards and it does guess domination. sent10: there is something such that if it is a kind of a PLF the fact that it is a flower and is genetics does not hold. sent11: if something is a kind of a peaceableness that it is non-uninjectable thing that is arbitrary is not true. sent12: the fact that the dilutant is a vagus and it is a palfrey is not correct if it guesses dilutant. sent13: the dilutant is not a Aporocactus but it is a metallurgist if it guesses dilutant. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the dilutant guesses dilutant then the fact that it is not a vagus and is a palfrey is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__