the doubling occurs.
sent1: if the barracking salience does not occur the pleaching bylaw does not occur but the cytoplasmicness occurs. sent2: that the capitalistness occurs is brought about by that the scouring does not occur but the pleaching rathole occurs. sent3: the barracking salience does not occur. sent4: if the pleaching Picus occurs then either the identification does not occur or the binauralness does not occur or both. sent5: the barracking Ascension occurs. sent6: that the identification does not occur prevents that the doubling does not occur. sent7: the smooching happens. sent8: that both the non-perinasalness and the Guyaneseness occurs is caused by that the pleaching bier does not occur. sent9: if the barracking salience happens that the doubling happens and the pleaching Picus does not occur is wrong. sent10: the simmer does not occur and the constructiveness happens. sent11: the doubling is caused by that the binauralness does not occur. sent12: that the uprising happens is caused by that the taekwondo does not occur but the pleaching Galatian occurs. sent13: the vexing fight does not occur but the systematicsness happens. sent14: if that the fact that both the pleaching Picus and the barracking salience occurs is false is true then the nonwashableness does not occur. sent15: that the vexing Strongylodon does not occur and the truthfulness happens results in the rating. sent16: the pleaching eraser does not occur or the vexing Menninger does not occur or both. sent17: that the pleaching bylaw does not occur and the cytoplasmicness occurs causes the pleaching Picus. sent18: the auricularness happens. sent19: the working Aaron happens.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: not the pleaching bylaw but the cytoplasmicness occurs.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the pleaching Picus happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the identification does not occur or the binauralness does not occur or both.; int3 & sent6 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the doubling does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the doubling occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the barracking salience does not occur the pleaching bylaw does not occur but the cytoplasmicness occurs. sent2: that the capitalistness occurs is brought about by that the scouring does not occur but the pleaching rathole occurs. sent3: the barracking salience does not occur. sent4: if the pleaching Picus occurs then either the identification does not occur or the binauralness does not occur or both. sent5: the barracking Ascension occurs. sent6: that the identification does not occur prevents that the doubling does not occur. sent7: the smooching happens. sent8: that both the non-perinasalness and the Guyaneseness occurs is caused by that the pleaching bier does not occur. sent9: if the barracking salience happens that the doubling happens and the pleaching Picus does not occur is wrong. sent10: the simmer does not occur and the constructiveness happens. sent11: the doubling is caused by that the binauralness does not occur. sent12: that the uprising happens is caused by that the taekwondo does not occur but the pleaching Galatian occurs. sent13: the vexing fight does not occur but the systematicsness happens. sent14: if that the fact that both the pleaching Picus and the barracking salience occurs is false is true then the nonwashableness does not occur. sent15: that the vexing Strongylodon does not occur and the truthfulness happens results in the rating. sent16: the pleaching eraser does not occur or the vexing Menninger does not occur or both. sent17: that the pleaching bylaw does not occur and the cytoplasmicness occurs causes the pleaching Picus. sent18: the auricularness happens. sent19: the working Aaron happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: not the pleaching bylaw but the cytoplasmicness occurs.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the pleaching Picus happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the identification does not occur or the binauralness does not occur or both.; int3 & sent6 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__