the supporting is prevented by that the redeploying isocyanate does not occur.
sent1: the support does not occur if the redeploying isocyanate occurs. sent2: the nonphotosyntheticness happens if the cross-pliness happens. sent3: the Achaeanness does not occur if the fact that the Achaeanness happens but the leapfrogging does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the redeploying isocyanate does not occur then the supporting happens. sent5: the Achaean happens if the resuscitating happens. sent6: that that the Achaean but not the leapfrogging occurs is not right is not wrong. sent7: that the Ball does not occur is prevented by that the resuscitating does not occur and the redeploying isocyanate does not occur. sent8: the fact that both the boarding spermicide and the non-alkahesticness happens is not true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the resuscitating happens.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the Achaean happens.; sent3 & sent6 -> int2: the Achaean does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the resuscitating does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the redeploying isocyanate does not occur.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the resuscitating does not occur and the redeploying isocyanate does not occur.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the Ball happens.;
the fact that both the boarding spermicide and the non-alkahesticness happens is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the supporting is prevented by that the redeploying isocyanate does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the support does not occur if the redeploying isocyanate occurs. sent2: the nonphotosyntheticness happens if the cross-pliness happens. sent3: the Achaeanness does not occur if the fact that the Achaeanness happens but the leapfrogging does not occur does not hold. sent4: if the redeploying isocyanate does not occur then the supporting happens. sent5: the Achaean happens if the resuscitating happens. sent6: that that the Achaean but not the leapfrogging occurs is not right is not wrong. sent7: that the Ball does not occur is prevented by that the resuscitating does not occur and the redeploying isocyanate does not occur. sent8: the fact that both the boarding spermicide and the non-alkahesticness happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the resuscitating happens.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the Achaean happens.; sent3 & sent6 -> int2: the Achaean does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the resuscitating does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the redeploying isocyanate does not occur.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the resuscitating does not occur and the redeploying isocyanate does not occur.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the Ball happens.; __UNKNOWN__