the flibbertigibbet does stare buteonine.
sent1: that the fact that the mesentery is a cheeseboard and non-pyretic is incorrect is not wrong if it bellows. sent2: the mesentery does not stare coiled. sent3: if the mesentery does stare coiled and it does gin inoculant then it is adducent. sent4: if the notary is a kind of a heroism the flibbertigibbet does stare buteonine. sent5: the nothosaur is not Napoleonic if the stomach is not Napoleonic. sent6: that if the stomach is not a Aeolus that the nothosaur is not Napoleonic hold is correct. sent7: the mesentery is a bellows. sent8: the walkingstick does not stare buteonine if something that does bellow does not reprise bolt. sent9: everything is not Napoleonic or is not a kind of a Aeolus or both. sent10: the flibbertigibbet is adducent if that the notary gins inoculant but it is not a vesicle does not hold. sent11: if the fact that either something stares coiled or it is a kind of a heroism or both does not hold it does not gin inoculant. sent12: if something that does not stare coiled does gin inoculant then it is adducent. sent13: that something does stare coiled or it is a heroism or both is not right if it does not stare buteonine. sent14: the fact that the mesentery is adducent hold if it is not a heroism and it stares coiled. sent15: the mesentery is not a vesicle if it is pyretic. sent16: the notary is a kind of a heroism if the mesentery is adducent. sent17: if something is not a vesicle it does not stare coiled and it gins inoculant. sent18: if that something is a cheeseboard but it is not pyretic is false then it is not a kind of a vesicle. sent19: if that something does not gin inoculant is correct the fact that the notary gin inoculant but it is not a vesicle is false. sent20: if the nothosaur is not Napoleonic the yodeller is glacial thing that does gin salal. sent21: the fact that the mesentery is a cheeseboard that is not non-pyretic does not hold. sent22: if something is glacial it bellows and does not reprise bolt. sent23: the notary stares buteonine.
sent18 -> int1: if the fact that the mesentery is a cheeseboard and is not pyretic is not correct it is not a vesicle.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: that the mesentery is a kind of a cheeseboard but it is not pyretic is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mesentery is not a vesicle.; sent17 -> int4: if the mesentery is not a kind of a vesicle it does not stare coiled and does gin inoculant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mesentery does not stare coiled but it does gin inoculant.; sent12 -> int6: the mesentery is adducent if it does not stare coiled and it does gin inoculant.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the mesentery is adducent.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the notary is a heroism.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the flibbertigibbet is adducent.
sent11 -> int9: the walkingstick does not gin inoculant if the fact that it stares coiled or it is a kind of a heroism or both is incorrect.; sent13 -> int10: the fact that the walkingstick stares coiled and/or it is a kind of a heroism is false if it does not stare buteonine.; sent22 -> int11: the yodeller bellows but it does not reprise bolt if it is glacial.; sent9 -> int12: the stomach is not Napoleonic and/or it is not a Aeolus.; int12 & sent5 & sent6 -> int13: the nothosaur is not Napoleonic.; sent20 & int13 -> int14: the yodeller is glacial thing that does gin salal.; int14 -> int15: the yodeller is glacial.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the yodeller is a bellows but it does not reprise bolt.; int16 -> int17: something does bellow but it does not reprise bolt.; int17 & sent8 -> int18: the walkingstick does not stare buteonine.; int10 & int18 -> int19: that that the walkingstick does stare coiled or it is a heroism or both is not right hold.; int9 & int19 -> int20: the walkingstick does not gin inoculant.; int20 -> int21: that something does not gin inoculant is not wrong.; int21 & sent19 -> int22: that the notary does gin inoculant and is not a kind of a vesicle is wrong.; sent10 & int22 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the flibbertigibbet does stare buteonine. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the mesentery is a cheeseboard and non-pyretic is incorrect is not wrong if it bellows. sent2: the mesentery does not stare coiled. sent3: if the mesentery does stare coiled and it does gin inoculant then it is adducent. sent4: if the notary is a kind of a heroism the flibbertigibbet does stare buteonine. sent5: the nothosaur is not Napoleonic if the stomach is not Napoleonic. sent6: that if the stomach is not a Aeolus that the nothosaur is not Napoleonic hold is correct. sent7: the mesentery is a bellows. sent8: the walkingstick does not stare buteonine if something that does bellow does not reprise bolt. sent9: everything is not Napoleonic or is not a kind of a Aeolus or both. sent10: the flibbertigibbet is adducent if that the notary gins inoculant but it is not a vesicle does not hold. sent11: if the fact that either something stares coiled or it is a kind of a heroism or both does not hold it does not gin inoculant. sent12: if something that does not stare coiled does gin inoculant then it is adducent. sent13: that something does stare coiled or it is a heroism or both is not right if it does not stare buteonine. sent14: the fact that the mesentery is adducent hold if it is not a heroism and it stares coiled. sent15: the mesentery is not a vesicle if it is pyretic. sent16: the notary is a kind of a heroism if the mesentery is adducent. sent17: if something is not a vesicle it does not stare coiled and it gins inoculant. sent18: if that something is a cheeseboard but it is not pyretic is false then it is not a kind of a vesicle. sent19: if that something does not gin inoculant is correct the fact that the notary gin inoculant but it is not a vesicle is false. sent20: if the nothosaur is not Napoleonic the yodeller is glacial thing that does gin salal. sent21: the fact that the mesentery is a cheeseboard that is not non-pyretic does not hold. sent22: if something is glacial it bellows and does not reprise bolt. sent23: the notary stares buteonine. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: if the fact that the mesentery is a cheeseboard and is not pyretic is not correct it is not a vesicle.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: that the mesentery is a kind of a cheeseboard but it is not pyretic is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mesentery is not a vesicle.; sent17 -> int4: if the mesentery is not a kind of a vesicle it does not stare coiled and does gin inoculant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mesentery does not stare coiled but it does gin inoculant.; sent12 -> int6: the mesentery is adducent if it does not stare coiled and it does gin inoculant.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the mesentery is adducent.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the notary is a heroism.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__