the fact that the airway is not incommensurate but it crystallizes does not hold.
sent1: the voluptuary is not incommensurate. sent2: if the gripsack does not crystallize then the airway is not a consort but it does crystallize. sent3: the airway does crystallize. sent4: if the gripsack is not ambitious the fact that the airway is a Sumerology and it is a kind of a consort is right. sent5: the gripsack does not crystallize if it is not a consort. sent6: the gripsack is not a consort. sent7: that something is not incommensurate and crystallizes does not hold if it is a consort. sent8: the airway is not a kind of a historicalness. sent9: the airway is not incommensurate but it does crystallize if the gripsack does not crystallize. sent10: the airway crystallizes if the gripsack does not crystallizes. sent11: if something does dote then it is not an ambassadress and is ambitious. sent12: if the office-bearer is not an ambassadress and is ambitious the gripsack is not ambitious. sent13: the airway does not trot.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the gripsack does not crystallize.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;
that the airway is not incommensurate but it crystallizes is not right.
sent7 -> int2: the fact that the airway is not incommensurate and crystallizes is not correct if it consorts.; sent11 -> int3: if that the office-bearer dotes is correct then it is not an ambassadress and it is ambitious.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the airway is not incommensurate but it crystallizes does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the voluptuary is not incommensurate. sent2: if the gripsack does not crystallize then the airway is not a consort but it does crystallize. sent3: the airway does crystallize. sent4: if the gripsack is not ambitious the fact that the airway is a Sumerology and it is a kind of a consort is right. sent5: the gripsack does not crystallize if it is not a consort. sent6: the gripsack is not a consort. sent7: that something is not incommensurate and crystallizes does not hold if it is a consort. sent8: the airway is not a kind of a historicalness. sent9: the airway is not incommensurate but it does crystallize if the gripsack does not crystallize. sent10: the airway crystallizes if the gripsack does not crystallizes. sent11: if something does dote then it is not an ambassadress and is ambitious. sent12: if the office-bearer is not an ambassadress and is ambitious the gripsack is not ambitious. sent13: the airway does not trot. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the gripsack does not crystallize.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__