that the fact that the arboriculture does not occur and the diffusing does not occur is correct if the complaint happens is not right.
sent1: the fact that the mellowing catalase does not occur hold. sent2: the short-orderness and the buying occurs. sent3: if the fact that the diffusedness occurs but the quelling does not occur does not hold then the diffusedness does not occur. sent4: the tearfulness and/or the diffusing occurs if the quelling does not occur. sent5: the uncertainness happens. sent6: that both the non-introspectiveness and the non-Satanicness occurs does not hold. sent7: the fact that the diffusing occurs and the quelling does not occur does not hold. sent8: that the tearfulness does not occur hold if not the estimableness but the manslaughter occurs. sent9: the theist does not occur and the quelling does not occur if the nativeness does not occur. sent10: the auspice does not occur and the error does not occur. sent11: the mellowing infrastructure does not occur. sent12: that the voltage and the arboriculture occurs is brought about by that the manslaughter does not occur. sent13: the immunodeficientness occurs. sent14: that both the Sisypheanness and the air-to-surfaceness occurs is caused by that the formula does not occur. sent15: if the estimableness happens that the complaint does not occur and the theophany does not occur is not true. sent16: the dialectics prevents that the tearfulness does not occur. sent17: the precipitation and the viviparousness happens. sent18: the estimableness is prevented by that both the arboriculture and the complaint occurs. sent19: the introspectiveness does not occur. sent20: the manslaughter and the theistness happens. sent21: the theophany occurs if that the complaint does not occur and the theophany does not occur is false. sent22: that the dialecticsness occurs and the Satanicness happens is caused by the non-introspectiveness.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the arboriculture occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the complaint happens.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the arboriculture and the complaint occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the estimableness does not occur.; sent20 -> int3: the manslaughter happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the non-estimableness and the manslaughter occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the tearfulness does not occur.; sent22 & sent19 -> int6: both the dialecticsness and the Satanicness occurs.; int6 -> int7: the dialectics occurs.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the tearfulness happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int9 -> int10: the arboriculture does not occur.; sent3 & sent7 -> int11: the diffusing does not occur.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the arboriculture does not occur and the diffusedness does not occur.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the voltage happens and the theophany occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the arboriculture does not occur and the diffusing does not occur is correct if the complaint happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mellowing catalase does not occur hold. sent2: the short-orderness and the buying occurs. sent3: if the fact that the diffusedness occurs but the quelling does not occur does not hold then the diffusedness does not occur. sent4: the tearfulness and/or the diffusing occurs if the quelling does not occur. sent5: the uncertainness happens. sent6: that both the non-introspectiveness and the non-Satanicness occurs does not hold. sent7: the fact that the diffusing occurs and the quelling does not occur does not hold. sent8: that the tearfulness does not occur hold if not the estimableness but the manslaughter occurs. sent9: the theist does not occur and the quelling does not occur if the nativeness does not occur. sent10: the auspice does not occur and the error does not occur. sent11: the mellowing infrastructure does not occur. sent12: that the voltage and the arboriculture occurs is brought about by that the manslaughter does not occur. sent13: the immunodeficientness occurs. sent14: that both the Sisypheanness and the air-to-surfaceness occurs is caused by that the formula does not occur. sent15: if the estimableness happens that the complaint does not occur and the theophany does not occur is not true. sent16: the dialectics prevents that the tearfulness does not occur. sent17: the precipitation and the viviparousness happens. sent18: the estimableness is prevented by that both the arboriculture and the complaint occurs. sent19: the introspectiveness does not occur. sent20: the manslaughter and the theistness happens. sent21: the theophany occurs if that the complaint does not occur and the theophany does not occur is false. sent22: that the dialecticsness occurs and the Satanicness happens is caused by the non-introspectiveness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the arboriculture occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the complaint happens.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the arboriculture and the complaint occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the estimableness does not occur.; sent20 -> int3: the manslaughter happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the non-estimableness and the manslaughter occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the tearfulness does not occur.; sent22 & sent19 -> int6: both the dialecticsness and the Satanicness occurs.; int6 -> int7: the dialectics occurs.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the tearfulness happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int9 -> int10: the arboriculture does not occur.; sent3 & sent7 -> int11: the diffusing does not occur.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the arboriculture does not occur and the diffusedness does not occur.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__