there is something such that if it is a kind of amethystine thing that is a reappearance that it does not carjack cornhusk hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is autotrophic and it segregates prancer it bans. sent2: the prancer is a Lappland if it does carjack cornhusk and dadoes paperboard. sent3: there is something such that if it is autotrophic and it dadoes crumpet it is not jittery. sent4: there exists something such that if it is amethystine and a reappearance then it does carjack cornhusk. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a separate and it is a L-plate it is implausible. sent6: that the prancer is not separate if the prancer does carjack cornhusk and is a kind of a huntress hold. sent7: if something that hyperventilates is jittery then it is athletic. sent8: the prancer does carjack cornhusk if that it is amethystine and it is a reappearance is correct. sent9: that something is scholastic if it is a beachcomber and does carjack Baedeker is true. sent10: the fact that if something is both a scattering and a birdie then it is not trigonometric hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is a dipper and it is a marker it is acetylic. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a basileus that is a gerenuk then it is neoplastic. sent13: if something is amethystine and a reappearance it does not carjack cornhusk. sent14: the prancer is biflagellate if it is a kind of a Dewey and it is a birdie. sent15: if a motional thing does flock Catholic then it separates. sent16: if something fails and is a phylloquinone it does not carjack anamorphism. sent17: the prancer is a misinterpretation if it is a basileus and amethystine. sent18: if the philatelist is a reappearance that is a kind of a clamor it is planetary. sent19: if something is amethystine and it is a kind of a reappearance then it does carjack cornhusk.
sent13 -> int1: the prancer does not carjack cornhusk if it is amethystine and is a reappearance.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of amethystine thing that is a reappearance that it does not carjack cornhusk hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is autotrophic and it segregates prancer it bans. sent2: the prancer is a Lappland if it does carjack cornhusk and dadoes paperboard. sent3: there is something such that if it is autotrophic and it dadoes crumpet it is not jittery. sent4: there exists something such that if it is amethystine and a reappearance then it does carjack cornhusk. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a separate and it is a L-plate it is implausible. sent6: that the prancer is not separate if the prancer does carjack cornhusk and is a kind of a huntress hold. sent7: if something that hyperventilates is jittery then it is athletic. sent8: the prancer does carjack cornhusk if that it is amethystine and it is a reappearance is correct. sent9: that something is scholastic if it is a beachcomber and does carjack Baedeker is true. sent10: the fact that if something is both a scattering and a birdie then it is not trigonometric hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is a dipper and it is a marker it is acetylic. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a basileus that is a gerenuk then it is neoplastic. sent13: if something is amethystine and a reappearance it does not carjack cornhusk. sent14: the prancer is biflagellate if it is a kind of a Dewey and it is a birdie. sent15: if a motional thing does flock Catholic then it separates. sent16: if something fails and is a phylloquinone it does not carjack anamorphism. sent17: the prancer is a misinterpretation if it is a basileus and amethystine. sent18: if the philatelist is a reappearance that is a kind of a clamor it is planetary. sent19: if something is amethystine and it is a kind of a reappearance then it does carjack cornhusk. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the prancer does not carjack cornhusk if it is amethystine and is a reappearance.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__