the telomerase covets hashish.
sent1: if the ratel is a kind of a Freudian the fact that the hashish squawks Niobe and is not a Freudian is wrong. sent2: the fact that the sand squawks Niobe but it does not treat bombazine does not hold. sent3: the telomerase covets hashish if the hashish does not squawk Niobe. sent4: the ratel is not a vivisectionist if the fact that it is a Suriname and is not ballistic is wrong. sent5: the telomerase covets hashish if that the hashish does squawk Niobe and is not a Freudian is not true. sent6: the ratel is not non-Freudian if it is a Suriname and it is not ballistic. sent7: the hashish does squawk Niobe and does not covet hashish. sent8: the ratel is a vivisectionist. sent9: if the hashish is synaptic it is a Aramean. sent10: if something that is not Freudian is a kind of a vivisectionist then it does not covet hashish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ratel is both a Suriname and not ballistic does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the ratel is not a vivisectionist.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the ratel is a Suriname and not ballistic.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the ratel is Freudian.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that that the hashish does squawk Niobe but it is not a kind of a Freudian is not right hold.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the telomerase does not covet hashish.
sent10 -> int6: the telomerase does not covet hashish if it is not Freudian but a vivisectionist.;
$hypothesis$ = the telomerase covets hashish. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ratel is a kind of a Freudian the fact that the hashish squawks Niobe and is not a Freudian is wrong. sent2: the fact that the sand squawks Niobe but it does not treat bombazine does not hold. sent3: the telomerase covets hashish if the hashish does not squawk Niobe. sent4: the ratel is not a vivisectionist if the fact that it is a Suriname and is not ballistic is wrong. sent5: the telomerase covets hashish if that the hashish does squawk Niobe and is not a Freudian is not true. sent6: the ratel is not non-Freudian if it is a Suriname and it is not ballistic. sent7: the hashish does squawk Niobe and does not covet hashish. sent8: the ratel is a vivisectionist. sent9: if the hashish is synaptic it is a Aramean. sent10: if something that is not Freudian is a kind of a vivisectionist then it does not covet hashish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ratel is both a Suriname and not ballistic does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the ratel is not a vivisectionist.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the ratel is a Suriname and not ballistic.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the ratel is Freudian.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that that the hashish does squawk Niobe but it is not a kind of a Freudian is not right hold.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__