if the Satanist is not a glance and does collect raving the rowanberry is not proteinaceous.
sent1: the Sealyham is a kind of a glance. sent2: if something is not a kind of a Sikh then it collects raving and it does not launch landowner. sent3: if something is not a glance and collects raving it is Sikh. sent4: the rowanberry is not proteinaceous if that the insulin does not launch landowner but it is a predicate is not right. sent5: the Satanist does not glance. sent6: the rowanberry is not proteinaceous if that the insulin launches landowner hold.
sent3 -> int1: the Satanist is a kind of a Sikh if it is not a kind of a glance and it does collect raving.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Satanist is not a glance and collects raving hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Satanist is a kind of a Sikh.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a Sikh.;
the rowanberry collects raving.
sent2 -> int4: the rowanberry collects raving and does not launch landowner if it is not a Sikh.;
$hypothesis$ = if the Satanist is not a glance and does collect raving the rowanberry is not proteinaceous. ; $context$ = sent1: the Sealyham is a kind of a glance. sent2: if something is not a kind of a Sikh then it collects raving and it does not launch landowner. sent3: if something is not a glance and collects raving it is Sikh. sent4: the rowanberry is not proteinaceous if that the insulin does not launch landowner but it is a predicate is not right. sent5: the Satanist does not glance. sent6: the rowanberry is not proteinaceous if that the insulin launches landowner hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the Satanist is a kind of a Sikh if it is not a kind of a glance and it does collect raving.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Satanist is not a glance and collects raving hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Satanist is a kind of a Sikh.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a Sikh.; __UNKNOWN__