there is something such that if it does misconstrue TRM and/or it is a gambist it is not calculable.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does skim stepdaughter it is not instructive. sent2: there is something such that if it is Ephesians and/or it is a suntrap it does not deduce Kwanzaa. sent3: there is something such that if it is a gambist it is not calculable. sent4: if the banana misconstrues TRM and/or it is a gambist it is calculable. sent5: if something does misconstrue TRM or it is a gambist or both then it is calculable. sent6: the niobite is not a kind of a whisk if it is benign or does deduce scab or both. sent7: that if either the banana does misconstrue TRM or it deduces scab or both then the fact that the banana is not zoological is not wrong is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a launch and/or unbars outline then it is not Sadducean. sent9: something is not a gambist if it is either instructive or a myelencephalon or both. sent10: if something is a protagonist and/or it unbars Tragopogon then it is not a kilobit. sent11: something does not unbar Pisonia if it raves and/or it is a kind of a typhoid. sent12: there exists something such that if it misconstrues viewers and/or it is a road then it is not dolomitic. sent13: there is something such that if it misconstrues TRM and/or is a kind of a gambist it is calculable. sent14: if something either is an irons or coxes or both then it is not a base. sent15: if the banana is a gambist then that it is calculable is false. sent16: if the barley is a Irula and/or it is a gambist it does not unbar outline. sent17: there exists something such that if it is either Bavarian or an irons or both then it is a kind of a team. sent18: there exists something such that if it does misconstrue TRM it is not calculable.
if the buntal is instructive or a myelencephalon or both then it is not a gambist.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does misconstrue TRM and/or it is a gambist it is not calculable. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does skim stepdaughter it is not instructive. sent2: there is something such that if it is Ephesians and/or it is a suntrap it does not deduce Kwanzaa. sent3: there is something such that if it is a gambist it is not calculable. sent4: if the banana misconstrues TRM and/or it is a gambist it is calculable. sent5: if something does misconstrue TRM or it is a gambist or both then it is calculable. sent6: the niobite is not a kind of a whisk if it is benign or does deduce scab or both. sent7: that if either the banana does misconstrue TRM or it deduces scab or both then the fact that the banana is not zoological is not wrong is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a launch and/or unbars outline then it is not Sadducean. sent9: something is not a gambist if it is either instructive or a myelencephalon or both. sent10: if something is a protagonist and/or it unbars Tragopogon then it is not a kilobit. sent11: something does not unbar Pisonia if it raves and/or it is a kind of a typhoid. sent12: there exists something such that if it misconstrues viewers and/or it is a road then it is not dolomitic. sent13: there is something such that if it misconstrues TRM and/or is a kind of a gambist it is calculable. sent14: if something either is an irons or coxes or both then it is not a base. sent15: if the banana is a gambist then that it is calculable is false. sent16: if the barley is a Irula and/or it is a gambist it does not unbar outline. sent17: there exists something such that if it is either Bavarian or an irons or both then it is a kind of a team. sent18: there exists something such that if it does misconstrue TRM it is not calculable. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__