the paca does not depose kirk and is avirulent.
sent1: something deposes asynergy but it is not avirulent if it is not a kibe. sent2: if the pegboard is a kind of a gulag then the peacock-throne is a paca. sent3: the trochanter is not a paca if the paca is not avirulent. sent4: if the peacock-throne is not a gulag and is a kibe the fact that the paca is not a kibe is not incorrect. sent5: if the gust is not a kind of a NADP it is not a kind of a hydrocolloid and it is not a samite. sent6: the peacock-throne does not resubmit cornsilk and is not atomistic if the fact that the gust is not a hydrocolloid is right. sent7: if something is a kibe then it is avirulent. sent8: the peacock-throne is a kind of a paca if the pegboard is a paca. sent9: the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy and is not a kind of a paca if the paca does not depose asynergy. sent10: the fact that the paca is not a kind of a Easter but it deposes kirk does not hold. sent11: the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy if there is something such that the fact that it depose asynergy and is a paca is wrong. sent12: if the paca does not depose asynergy the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy. sent13: that the paca is a kind of a Easter but it does not depose kirk is incorrect. sent14: if the gust is a kind of a kibe the paca is a kibe. sent15: the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy. sent16: the fact that something deposes asynergy and is a paca is not true if it is not a kibe. sent17: the gust is a kind of a kibe. sent18: the paca does not depose asynergy if the fact that it is not a Easter and does not depose kirk does not hold. sent19: if something is not atomistic then it is not a gulag but a kibe. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of criminological thing that is protrusive does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the paca is not a Easter and it does not depose kirk is not correct.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the paca does not depose asynergy.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy and it is not a paca.; int2 -> int3: the peacock-throne is not a paca.; sent7 -> int4: that the paca is avirulent is right if it is a kind of a kibe.; sent14 & sent17 -> int5: the paca is a kibe.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the paca is avirulent.;
the trochanter is not a paca.
sent1 -> int7: if the paca is not a kibe it does depose asynergy and is not avirulent.; sent19 -> int8: the peacock-throne is both not a gulag and a kibe if it is not atomistic.;
$hypothesis$ = the paca does not depose kirk and is avirulent. ; $context$ = sent1: something deposes asynergy but it is not avirulent if it is not a kibe. sent2: if the pegboard is a kind of a gulag then the peacock-throne is a paca. sent3: the trochanter is not a paca if the paca is not avirulent. sent4: if the peacock-throne is not a gulag and is a kibe the fact that the paca is not a kibe is not incorrect. sent5: if the gust is not a kind of a NADP it is not a kind of a hydrocolloid and it is not a samite. sent6: the peacock-throne does not resubmit cornsilk and is not atomistic if the fact that the gust is not a hydrocolloid is right. sent7: if something is a kibe then it is avirulent. sent8: the peacock-throne is a kind of a paca if the pegboard is a paca. sent9: the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy and is not a kind of a paca if the paca does not depose asynergy. sent10: the fact that the paca is not a kind of a Easter but it deposes kirk does not hold. sent11: the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy if there is something such that the fact that it depose asynergy and is a paca is wrong. sent12: if the paca does not depose asynergy the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy. sent13: that the paca is a kind of a Easter but it does not depose kirk is incorrect. sent14: if the gust is a kind of a kibe the paca is a kibe. sent15: the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy. sent16: the fact that something deposes asynergy and is a paca is not true if it is not a kibe. sent17: the gust is a kind of a kibe. sent18: the paca does not depose asynergy if the fact that it is not a Easter and does not depose kirk does not hold. sent19: if something is not atomistic then it is not a gulag but a kibe. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of criminological thing that is protrusive does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the paca is not a Easter and it does not depose kirk is not correct.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the paca does not depose asynergy.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the peacock-throne does not depose asynergy and it is not a paca.; int2 -> int3: the peacock-throne is not a paca.; sent7 -> int4: that the paca is avirulent is right if it is a kind of a kibe.; sent14 & sent17 -> int5: the paca is a kibe.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the paca is avirulent.; __UNKNOWN__