the OS looks isometric.
sent1: something is a windbreak if it does not permit etiquette and is not a turmeric. sent2: if something is a kind of a turmeric it does look isometric. sent3: either the bones is a kind of a Laver or it is a dell or both. sent4: if the chaplain is not a kind of a windbreak then that the mahout does not permit etiquette but it is a windbreak does not hold. sent5: the fact that the islay is Neanderthal and it is meningeal is not right. sent6: the fact that the Rioja is Neanderthal and is not unreal is not right. sent7: if the mahout is a borough then it is insufficient. sent8: if the chaplain is a Empetraceae the Rioja looks isometric and does not look JRA. sent9: if there is something such that it is a Tagore then the chaplain is unreal. sent10: that the mouser permits turbine but it is not gastronomic is not right if the bones is a Aum. sent11: if the fact that the pickup is a windbreak is right then that the mahout is not non-labial and is not a kind of a Tagore is false. sent12: that the mahout is a windbreak but it is not a turmeric is not correct if it is not unreal. sent13: the salsa is not gastronomic if that the mouser does permit turbine but it is not gastronomic is not correct. sent14: the OS does not look isometric if the Rioja does look isometric but it does not look JRA. sent15: if that the mahout does not permit etiquette and is a windbreak is wrong then the OS is a kind of a turmeric. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it is a labial and it is not a kind of a Empetraceae is wrong then the chaplain is a kind of a Tagore. sent17: that if the OS is a kind of a labial then the Rioja does look isometric hold. sent18: if something is a Tagore it is not a windbreak. sent19: if the salsa is not gastronomic then the pickup is both not publishable and a heroic. sent20: if something is a kind of a heroic it does not permit etiquette and it is not a kind of a turmeric. sent21: the Rioja does not look JRA if the fact that it is Neanderthal and it is not unreal does not hold. sent22: the fact that something is labial but it is not a Empetraceae does not hold if it does not look JRA. sent23: the fact that something is a kind of a occultism but it does not fidget butterscotch does not hold if it is not a Empetraceae. sent24: something is a kind of a Tagore if it is unreal.
sent21 & sent6 -> int1: the Rioja does not look JRA.; sent22 -> int2: if the Rioja does not look JRA then that it is a labial and it is not a Empetraceae is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Rioja is a kind of a labial and is not a kind of a Empetraceae is not correct.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a labial and it is not a kind of a Empetraceae is not right.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the chaplain is a Tagore.; sent18 -> int6: if the fact that the chaplain is a kind of a Tagore is correct it is not a kind of a windbreak.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the chaplain is not a windbreak hold.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: that the fact that the mahout does not permit etiquette but it is a kind of a windbreak is true is false.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the OS is a turmeric.; sent2 -> int10: if the OS is a kind of a turmeric it looks isometric.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the chaplain is a occultism but it does not fidget butterscotch is false.
sent23 -> int11: the fact that the chaplain is a occultism and does not fidget butterscotch is false if it is not a kind of a Empetraceae.;
$hypothesis$ = the OS looks isometric. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a windbreak if it does not permit etiquette and is not a turmeric. sent2: if something is a kind of a turmeric it does look isometric. sent3: either the bones is a kind of a Laver or it is a dell or both. sent4: if the chaplain is not a kind of a windbreak then that the mahout does not permit etiquette but it is a windbreak does not hold. sent5: the fact that the islay is Neanderthal and it is meningeal is not right. sent6: the fact that the Rioja is Neanderthal and is not unreal is not right. sent7: if the mahout is a borough then it is insufficient. sent8: if the chaplain is a Empetraceae the Rioja looks isometric and does not look JRA. sent9: if there is something such that it is a Tagore then the chaplain is unreal. sent10: that the mouser permits turbine but it is not gastronomic is not right if the bones is a Aum. sent11: if the fact that the pickup is a windbreak is right then that the mahout is not non-labial and is not a kind of a Tagore is false. sent12: that the mahout is a windbreak but it is not a turmeric is not correct if it is not unreal. sent13: the salsa is not gastronomic if that the mouser does permit turbine but it is not gastronomic is not correct. sent14: the OS does not look isometric if the Rioja does look isometric but it does not look JRA. sent15: if that the mahout does not permit etiquette and is a windbreak is wrong then the OS is a kind of a turmeric. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it is a labial and it is not a kind of a Empetraceae is wrong then the chaplain is a kind of a Tagore. sent17: that if the OS is a kind of a labial then the Rioja does look isometric hold. sent18: if something is a Tagore it is not a windbreak. sent19: if the salsa is not gastronomic then the pickup is both not publishable and a heroic. sent20: if something is a kind of a heroic it does not permit etiquette and it is not a kind of a turmeric. sent21: the Rioja does not look JRA if the fact that it is Neanderthal and it is not unreal does not hold. sent22: the fact that something is labial but it is not a Empetraceae does not hold if it does not look JRA. sent23: the fact that something is a kind of a occultism but it does not fidget butterscotch does not hold if it is not a Empetraceae. sent24: something is a kind of a Tagore if it is unreal. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent6 -> int1: the Rioja does not look JRA.; sent22 -> int2: if the Rioja does not look JRA then that it is a labial and it is not a Empetraceae is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Rioja is a kind of a labial and is not a kind of a Empetraceae is not correct.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a labial and it is not a kind of a Empetraceae is not right.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the chaplain is a Tagore.; sent18 -> int6: if the fact that the chaplain is a kind of a Tagore is correct it is not a kind of a windbreak.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the chaplain is not a windbreak hold.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: that the fact that the mahout does not permit etiquette but it is a kind of a windbreak is true is false.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the OS is a turmeric.; sent2 -> int10: if the OS is a kind of a turmeric it looks isometric.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__