the fact that the appendage briefs chapman and is a Chiwere is not true.
sent1: if that the dopamine is Venetian thing that is not accurate is incorrect it is not a telescope. sent2: if something is inaccurate and it redeems it is not a kind of a telescope. sent3: the dopamine is Venetian and it is a telescope if it does not brief chapman. sent4: something briefs chapman and is a Chiwere if the fact that it is not inaccurate is correct. sent5: if that something is digital and it is a Venetian is wrong then that it is not inaccurate is not incorrect. sent6: something is sure an absolution if it is not vegetal. sent7: the plat does not brief chapman. sent8: if the dopamine does not telescope then it is both digital and inaccurate. sent9: there is something such that that it peruses two is not incorrect. sent10: if the dopamine does not telescope then the fact that the appendage is digital and a Venetian is incorrect. sent11: the scum does telescope if it is not unperceptive. sent12: the dopamine is not a Chiwere. sent13: if the fact that the dopamine does brief chapman and it is not non-digital does not hold it does not telescope. sent14: the dopamine is not a telescope. sent15: the fact that the appendage does not telescope is not false. sent16: if the appendage does not telescope then the fact that the dopamine is a Chiwere and is Venetian is not true. sent17: the fact that the buckskin is a Chiwere that does chasten is not true. sent18: the dopamine does brief chapman and peruses cold. sent19: if the appendage is not Venetian it is not inaccurate. sent20: the menial is not inaccurate. sent21: there exists something such that the fact that it either does not vacuum parasailing or does not brief brushwork or both is not true. sent22: something is a kind of a circularization that is not non-radial if it is not a spruce. sent23: if that the runner impinges appendage and it is a kind of a radial is not correct then it does not impinge buggy.
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the appendage is digital and it is a kind of a Venetian does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the appendage is digital and it is a kind of a Venetian does not hold then it is not inaccurate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the appendage is not inaccurate.; sent4 -> int4: the appendage does brief chapman and is a Chiwere if it is not inaccurate.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the appendage briefs chapman and is a Chiwere is incorrect.
sent2 -> int5: if the appendage is inaccurate and redeems it is not a telescope.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the appendage briefs chapman and is a Chiwere is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the dopamine is Venetian thing that is not accurate is incorrect it is not a telescope. sent2: if something is inaccurate and it redeems it is not a kind of a telescope. sent3: the dopamine is Venetian and it is a telescope if it does not brief chapman. sent4: something briefs chapman and is a Chiwere if the fact that it is not inaccurate is correct. sent5: if that something is digital and it is a Venetian is wrong then that it is not inaccurate is not incorrect. sent6: something is sure an absolution if it is not vegetal. sent7: the plat does not brief chapman. sent8: if the dopamine does not telescope then it is both digital and inaccurate. sent9: there is something such that that it peruses two is not incorrect. sent10: if the dopamine does not telescope then the fact that the appendage is digital and a Venetian is incorrect. sent11: the scum does telescope if it is not unperceptive. sent12: the dopamine is not a Chiwere. sent13: if the fact that the dopamine does brief chapman and it is not non-digital does not hold it does not telescope. sent14: the dopamine is not a telescope. sent15: the fact that the appendage does not telescope is not false. sent16: if the appendage does not telescope then the fact that the dopamine is a Chiwere and is Venetian is not true. sent17: the fact that the buckskin is a Chiwere that does chasten is not true. sent18: the dopamine does brief chapman and peruses cold. sent19: if the appendage is not Venetian it is not inaccurate. sent20: the menial is not inaccurate. sent21: there exists something such that the fact that it either does not vacuum parasailing or does not brief brushwork or both is not true. sent22: something is a kind of a circularization that is not non-radial if it is not a spruce. sent23: if that the runner impinges appendage and it is a kind of a radial is not correct then it does not impinge buggy. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the appendage is digital and it is a kind of a Venetian does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the appendage is digital and it is a kind of a Venetian does not hold then it is not inaccurate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the appendage is not inaccurate.; sent4 -> int4: the appendage does brief chapman and is a Chiwere if it is not inaccurate.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__