that there exists something such that if it is a palisade then it is not loyal is false.
sent1: something is fruitful and it is cervine if it is not contralateral. sent2: the transcendentalist is not fruitful if the doxorubicin is a palisade and does fry. sent3: the transcendentalist is cervine. sent4: if something does not fry it is not loyal. sent5: if there is something such that it does not unmake college then the transcendentalist does unmake arrogator but it does not eliminate devisal. sent6: if something does unmake arrogator and does not eliminate devisal the doxorubicin is loyal. sent7: the Maidu is not contralateral and is buccal. sent8: there exists something such that it does not unmake college. sent9: if the transcendentalist is cervine then it is fruitful. sent10: if something does unmake Scomberomorus then it does not eliminate Trogonidae. sent11: something is not araneidal if it does not interrelate porthole. sent12: that the doxorubicin is loyal hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a palisade it is loyal. sent14: something is a plumcot if it is fruitful. sent15: if the doxorubicin does fry it is cervine. sent16: the transcendentalist is not cervine if it is not a kind of a palisade. sent17: the transcendentalist is loyal. sent18: something is a Kalimantan and is a palisade if it does not fry. sent19: that the transcendentalist does not react is true. sent20: the doxorubicin is loyal if it is a palisade.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the doxorubicin is a palisade.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the doxorubicin fries.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the doxorubicin is a palisade and it does fry.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the transcendentalist is not fruitful.; sent9 & sent3 -> int3: the transcendentalist is fruitful.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the doxorubicin does not fry.; sent4 -> int6: the doxorubicin is not loyal if it does not fry.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the doxorubicin is not loyal.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: if the doxorubicin is a palisade it is not loyal.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the fiance does not eliminate Trogonidae if it does unmake Scomberomorus.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a palisade then it is not loyal is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is fruitful and it is cervine if it is not contralateral. sent2: the transcendentalist is not fruitful if the doxorubicin is a palisade and does fry. sent3: the transcendentalist is cervine. sent4: if something does not fry it is not loyal. sent5: if there is something such that it does not unmake college then the transcendentalist does unmake arrogator but it does not eliminate devisal. sent6: if something does unmake arrogator and does not eliminate devisal the doxorubicin is loyal. sent7: the Maidu is not contralateral and is buccal. sent8: there exists something such that it does not unmake college. sent9: if the transcendentalist is cervine then it is fruitful. sent10: if something does unmake Scomberomorus then it does not eliminate Trogonidae. sent11: something is not araneidal if it does not interrelate porthole. sent12: that the doxorubicin is loyal hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a palisade it is loyal. sent14: something is a plumcot if it is fruitful. sent15: if the doxorubicin does fry it is cervine. sent16: the transcendentalist is not cervine if it is not a kind of a palisade. sent17: the transcendentalist is loyal. sent18: something is a Kalimantan and is a palisade if it does not fry. sent19: that the transcendentalist does not react is true. sent20: the doxorubicin is loyal if it is a palisade. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the doxorubicin is a palisade.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the doxorubicin fries.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the doxorubicin is a palisade and it does fry.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the transcendentalist is not fruitful.; sent9 & sent3 -> int3: the transcendentalist is fruitful.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the doxorubicin does not fry.; sent4 -> int6: the doxorubicin is not loyal if it does not fry.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the doxorubicin is not loyal.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: if the doxorubicin is a palisade it is not loyal.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__