there exists something such that if it does recline then it is not sexy.
sent1: that there is something such that if it reclines it is sexy is true. sent2: if the Daniel reclines then it is sexy. sent3: something is vocalic. sent4: the stepladder is not receptive if the fact that it is a pluralization is not wrong. sent5: if the fact that the stepladder is basophilic thing that is not a pluralization is not right that it is not receptive is correct. sent6: if the fact that the stepladder is not metamorphic is true that it is basophilic and it is a pluralization does not hold. sent7: something is not a preserve but it is vocalic. sent8: the fact that the stepladder is a kind of basophilic a pluralization is incorrect. sent9: if that something is not a kind of a preserve and is vocalic is not incorrect then the stepladder is receptive. sent10: the stepladder is not metamorphic if the Daniel is sexy and it reclines. sent11: the fact that something is basophilic but it is not a pluralization is not right if it is not metamorphic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Daniel is sexy is true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the Daniel does recline is not incorrect.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the Daniel is sexy and it does recline.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the stepladder is not metamorphic.; sent11 -> int3: that the stepladder is basophilic but it is not a pluralization is not true if it is not metamorphic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the stepladder is basophilic but it is not a pluralization is not right.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the stepladder is not receptive.; sent7 & sent9 -> int6: the stepladder is receptive.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Daniel is not sexy is correct.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: if the Daniel does recline then it is not sexy.; int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does recline then it is not sexy. ; $context$ = sent1: that there is something such that if it reclines it is sexy is true. sent2: if the Daniel reclines then it is sexy. sent3: something is vocalic. sent4: the stepladder is not receptive if the fact that it is a pluralization is not wrong. sent5: if the fact that the stepladder is basophilic thing that is not a pluralization is not right that it is not receptive is correct. sent6: if the fact that the stepladder is not metamorphic is true that it is basophilic and it is a pluralization does not hold. sent7: something is not a preserve but it is vocalic. sent8: the fact that the stepladder is a kind of basophilic a pluralization is incorrect. sent9: if that something is not a kind of a preserve and is vocalic is not incorrect then the stepladder is receptive. sent10: the stepladder is not metamorphic if the Daniel is sexy and it reclines. sent11: the fact that something is basophilic but it is not a pluralization is not right if it is not metamorphic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Daniel is sexy is true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the Daniel does recline is not incorrect.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the Daniel is sexy and it does recline.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the stepladder is not metamorphic.; sent11 -> int3: that the stepladder is basophilic but it is not a pluralization is not true if it is not metamorphic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the stepladder is basophilic but it is not a pluralization is not right.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the stepladder is not receptive.; sent7 & sent9 -> int6: the stepladder is receptive.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Daniel is not sexy is correct.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: if the Daniel does recline then it is not sexy.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__