the varnisher is not a STP.
sent1: that something is not untranslatable but boneless is not correct if it is a outcaste. sent2: if the fact that the gearshift mystifies BMDO is right it is provencal. sent3: if that the varnisher is non-provencal thing that is a Bridget is not correct then it is not a STP. sent4: the spatchcock does mystify BMDO if the fact that it is a clergy hold. sent5: the fact that the varnisher is a kind of provencal a Bridget is not correct if the gearshift is provencal. sent6: the gearshift is not a clergy if that the capstan is not a frustum and is a clergy is not correct. sent7: the gearshift is a soundtrack if the varnisher is not a clergy but a soundtrack. sent8: if the spatchcock is not a kind of a soundtrack but it outstares ornamentalism it is a clergy. sent9: that the varnisher is a kind of provencal a Bridget is incorrect. sent10: the capstan is provencal and it is a Bridget if it is not vacuolate. sent11: the varnisher is not a STP if that it is provencal hold. sent12: the fact that the varnisher is not provencal and is a Bridget is incorrect if the fact that the gearshift is provencal is not wrong. sent13: if something is provencal then that the fact that it is not a frustum but a clergy is not incorrect is incorrect. sent14: if something that is not a kind of a soundtrack does not outstare ornamentalism then it is a clergy. sent15: the spatchcock is not a soundtrack and it does not outstare ornamentalism. sent16: if the gearshift is not a kind of a clergy the varnisher is a STP and it does mystify BMDO. sent17: something is provencal if it does mystify BMDO. sent18: if the spatchcock does mystify BMDO then the fact that the gearshift does not mystify BMDO and is not a frustum is not true. sent19: if something is not a soundtrack but it does outstare ornamentalism that it is a clergy hold. sent20: something is provencal if the fact that it does not mystify BMDO and it is not a kind of a frustum is incorrect. sent21: if that something is not untranslatable but it is boneless is incorrect it is not vacuolate.
sent14 -> int1: if the spatchcock is not a soundtrack and it does not outstare ornamentalism the fact that it is a clergy is not false.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the spatchcock is a clergy.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the spatchcock does mystify BMDO.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: that the gearshift does not mystify BMDO and is not a kind of a frustum is incorrect.; sent20 -> int5: if the fact that the gearshift does not mystify BMDO and is not a frustum is not right it is provencal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gearshift is provencal.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that that the varnisher is not provencal but it is a Bridget is correct is not right.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the varnisher is a STP.
sent13 -> int8: that the capstan is not a frustum but it is a clergy is not right if that it is provencal is correct.; sent21 -> int9: the capstan is not vacuolate if that it is not untranslatable and it is boneless is not correct.; sent1 -> int10: if the capstan is a outcaste then that it is both translatable and not non-boneless is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the varnisher is not a STP. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not untranslatable but boneless is not correct if it is a outcaste. sent2: if the fact that the gearshift mystifies BMDO is right it is provencal. sent3: if that the varnisher is non-provencal thing that is a Bridget is not correct then it is not a STP. sent4: the spatchcock does mystify BMDO if the fact that it is a clergy hold. sent5: the fact that the varnisher is a kind of provencal a Bridget is not correct if the gearshift is provencal. sent6: the gearshift is not a clergy if that the capstan is not a frustum and is a clergy is not correct. sent7: the gearshift is a soundtrack if the varnisher is not a clergy but a soundtrack. sent8: if the spatchcock is not a kind of a soundtrack but it outstares ornamentalism it is a clergy. sent9: that the varnisher is a kind of provencal a Bridget is incorrect. sent10: the capstan is provencal and it is a Bridget if it is not vacuolate. sent11: the varnisher is not a STP if that it is provencal hold. sent12: the fact that the varnisher is not provencal and is a Bridget is incorrect if the fact that the gearshift is provencal is not wrong. sent13: if something is provencal then that the fact that it is not a frustum but a clergy is not incorrect is incorrect. sent14: if something that is not a kind of a soundtrack does not outstare ornamentalism then it is a clergy. sent15: the spatchcock is not a soundtrack and it does not outstare ornamentalism. sent16: if the gearshift is not a kind of a clergy the varnisher is a STP and it does mystify BMDO. sent17: something is provencal if it does mystify BMDO. sent18: if the spatchcock does mystify BMDO then the fact that the gearshift does not mystify BMDO and is not a frustum is not true. sent19: if something is not a soundtrack but it does outstare ornamentalism that it is a clergy hold. sent20: something is provencal if the fact that it does not mystify BMDO and it is not a kind of a frustum is incorrect. sent21: if that something is not untranslatable but it is boneless is incorrect it is not vacuolate. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the spatchcock is not a soundtrack and it does not outstare ornamentalism the fact that it is a clergy is not false.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the spatchcock is a clergy.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the spatchcock does mystify BMDO.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: that the gearshift does not mystify BMDO and is not a kind of a frustum is incorrect.; sent20 -> int5: if the fact that the gearshift does not mystify BMDO and is not a frustum is not right it is provencal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gearshift is provencal.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that that the varnisher is not provencal but it is a Bridget is correct is not right.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__