the fact that there exists something such that it is kinetic and it is amphibious is false.
sent1: the cordgrass is not futuristic. sent2: if the cybernaut is not a kind of a anaglyphy and does not incriminate porcelain the halter does not offload. sent3: something riddles babble if it is not a VIP. sent4: something is kinetic and riddles plastid if it does not offload. sent5: the fact that either the halter is a Cambodian or it does not stick katydid or both is wrong. sent6: if the fact that that the halter is Cambodian and/or does not stick katydid hold does not hold it flashes. sent7: the fact that the cordgrass is futuristic and it is Cambodian if the cordgrass is not kinetic is not incorrect. sent8: everything does riddle plastid. sent9: the fact that if something does riddle plastid that it is not a Balkan and not futuristic is false is correct. sent10: if the halter does not incriminate porcelain then it offloads and riddles plastid. sent11: if the halter is not kinetic then the cybernaut does not incriminate porcelain and does not offload. sent12: the cybernaut does riddle peonage. sent13: the fact that the cybernaut is a kind of a synapse hold. sent14: something is amphibious if it flashes. sent15: the cartoonist is a flash and Djiboutian. sent16: the halter is not futuristic if the cybernaut is not a kind of a anaglyphy and riddles plastid. sent17: if the fact that that the halter is a anaglyphy is false is right it riddles plastid and it is futuristic. sent18: if the cordgrass is non-futuristic then the cybernaut is not a anaglyphy and does not incriminate porcelain.
sent18 & sent1 -> int1: the cybernaut is not a anaglyphy and it does not incriminate porcelain.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the halter does not offload.; sent4 -> int3: if the halter does not offload then it is kinetic thing that does riddle plastid.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the halter is a kind of kinetic thing that does riddle plastid.; int4 -> int5: the halter is kinetic.; sent14 -> int6: if the halter does flash then it is amphibious.; sent6 & sent5 -> int7: the halter is a flash.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the halter is amphibious.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the halter is kinetic and amphibious.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the plastid is a Balkan and it is a Cambodian.
sent9 -> int10: if the cybernaut riddles plastid then that it is not a kind of a Balkan and is not futuristic is not right.; sent8 -> int11: the cybernaut does riddle plastid.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the cybernaut is not a Balkan and not futuristic is wrong.; int12 -> int13: there is nothing such that it is both not a Balkan and not futuristic.; int13 -> int14: the fact that the cordgrass is not a Balkan and not futuristic is not right.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Balkan and it is not futuristic is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is kinetic and it is amphibious is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the cordgrass is not futuristic. sent2: if the cybernaut is not a kind of a anaglyphy and does not incriminate porcelain the halter does not offload. sent3: something riddles babble if it is not a VIP. sent4: something is kinetic and riddles plastid if it does not offload. sent5: the fact that either the halter is a Cambodian or it does not stick katydid or both is wrong. sent6: if the fact that that the halter is Cambodian and/or does not stick katydid hold does not hold it flashes. sent7: the fact that the cordgrass is futuristic and it is Cambodian if the cordgrass is not kinetic is not incorrect. sent8: everything does riddle plastid. sent9: the fact that if something does riddle plastid that it is not a Balkan and not futuristic is false is correct. sent10: if the halter does not incriminate porcelain then it offloads and riddles plastid. sent11: if the halter is not kinetic then the cybernaut does not incriminate porcelain and does not offload. sent12: the cybernaut does riddle peonage. sent13: the fact that the cybernaut is a kind of a synapse hold. sent14: something is amphibious if it flashes. sent15: the cartoonist is a flash and Djiboutian. sent16: the halter is not futuristic if the cybernaut is not a kind of a anaglyphy and riddles plastid. sent17: if the fact that that the halter is a anaglyphy is false is right it riddles plastid and it is futuristic. sent18: if the cordgrass is non-futuristic then the cybernaut is not a anaglyphy and does not incriminate porcelain. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent1 -> int1: the cybernaut is not a anaglyphy and it does not incriminate porcelain.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the halter does not offload.; sent4 -> int3: if the halter does not offload then it is kinetic thing that does riddle plastid.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the halter is a kind of kinetic thing that does riddle plastid.; int4 -> int5: the halter is kinetic.; sent14 -> int6: if the halter does flash then it is amphibious.; sent6 & sent5 -> int7: the halter is a flash.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the halter is amphibious.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the halter is kinetic and amphibious.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__