the stibnite is non-directed and it does not spot rootage.
sent1: the stibnite does not spot rootage. sent2: the stibnite does not fudge botany. sent3: the stibnite is not a Speaker. sent4: the fact that the Berg is a decree but it is not a shoelace does not hold. sent5: the stibnite is not a kind of a metaphor and it is not an absinthe if the fact that it does not fudge botany is true. sent6: if the loupe does not fudge Ceterach and barks then it beats Beguine. sent7: if that something is not a kind of an absinthe but it spots rootage is right then it does fudge Ceterach. sent8: The rootage does not spot stibnite. sent9: the stibnite fudges Ceterach. sent10: The Ceterach fudges stibnite. sent11: the stibnite does not direct if it fudges Ceterach and it decrees. sent12: The botany does not fudge stibnite.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the stibnite is not a metaphor and it is not a kind of an absinthe.;
that the stibnite is non-directed thing that does not spot rootage is incorrect.
sent4 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a decree and not a shoelace is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the stibnite is non-directed and it does not spot rootage. ; $context$ = sent1: the stibnite does not spot rootage. sent2: the stibnite does not fudge botany. sent3: the stibnite is not a Speaker. sent4: the fact that the Berg is a decree but it is not a shoelace does not hold. sent5: the stibnite is not a kind of a metaphor and it is not an absinthe if the fact that it does not fudge botany is true. sent6: if the loupe does not fudge Ceterach and barks then it beats Beguine. sent7: if that something is not a kind of an absinthe but it spots rootage is right then it does fudge Ceterach. sent8: The rootage does not spot stibnite. sent9: the stibnite fudges Ceterach. sent10: The Ceterach fudges stibnite. sent11: the stibnite does not direct if it fudges Ceterach and it decrees. sent12: The botany does not fudge stibnite. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the stibnite is not a metaphor and it is not a kind of an absinthe.; __UNKNOWN__