that the neckpiece is a force but it is not pediatrics hold.
sent1: the piper is not a kind of a force or it is not pediatrics or both. sent2: The chickeree does forage ratel. sent3: the neckpiece is not a Patella if that the vinegar is a kind of a lilac but it is not a Patella is wrong. sent4: the neckpiece is not pediatrics. sent5: if something is a kind of a nullah the piper is a force and not a lilac. sent6: the fact that the neckpiece is not pediatrics is right if there exists something such that it is a kind of a lilac. sent7: the remainder is not a Patella. sent8: the ratel does forage chickeree. sent9: the vinegar is not a nullah if there is something such that it is not a force and/or it is not pediatrics. sent10: that something is a lilac that is not a Patella is not right if it is a nullah. sent11: if the neckpiece is not a Patella then the fact that it is both a force and non-pediatrics does not hold. sent12: if something forages chickeree then the fact that the ratel is not a kind of a nullah is not incorrect. sent13: the neckpiece is not a nullah and it is not pediatrics. sent14: the vinegar is not a Patella. sent15: if something does forage chickeree then the piper is not a nullah. sent16: the neckpiece is a force but it is not pediatrics if there exists something such that it is a lilac. sent17: if something is a Patella then it is not a kind of a eudiometer and it is not syllogistic. sent18: if the vinegar is not a kind of a Patella and it is not a kind of a lilac then the piper is a kind of a nullah.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vinegar is not a lilac.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the vinegar is both not a Patella and not a lilac.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the piper is a nullah hold.; sent8 -> int3: there is something such that it does forage chickeree.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the piper is not a nullah.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the vinegar is a lilac.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a lilac.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the mobile is not a eudiometer and is not syllogistic.
sent17 -> int8: the mobile is not a kind of a eudiometer and it is not syllogistic if it is a Patella.; sent1 -> int9: something is not a force and/or it is non-pediatrics.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the vinegar is not a nullah.;
$hypothesis$ = that the neckpiece is a force but it is not pediatrics hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the piper is not a kind of a force or it is not pediatrics or both. sent2: The chickeree does forage ratel. sent3: the neckpiece is not a Patella if that the vinegar is a kind of a lilac but it is not a Patella is wrong. sent4: the neckpiece is not pediatrics. sent5: if something is a kind of a nullah the piper is a force and not a lilac. sent6: the fact that the neckpiece is not pediatrics is right if there exists something such that it is a kind of a lilac. sent7: the remainder is not a Patella. sent8: the ratel does forage chickeree. sent9: the vinegar is not a nullah if there is something such that it is not a force and/or it is not pediatrics. sent10: that something is a lilac that is not a Patella is not right if it is a nullah. sent11: if the neckpiece is not a Patella then the fact that it is both a force and non-pediatrics does not hold. sent12: if something forages chickeree then the fact that the ratel is not a kind of a nullah is not incorrect. sent13: the neckpiece is not a nullah and it is not pediatrics. sent14: the vinegar is not a Patella. sent15: if something does forage chickeree then the piper is not a nullah. sent16: the neckpiece is a force but it is not pediatrics if there exists something such that it is a lilac. sent17: if something is a Patella then it is not a kind of a eudiometer and it is not syllogistic. sent18: if the vinegar is not a kind of a Patella and it is not a kind of a lilac then the piper is a kind of a nullah. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vinegar is not a lilac.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the vinegar is both not a Patella and not a lilac.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the piper is a nullah hold.; sent8 -> int3: there is something such that it does forage chickeree.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the piper is not a nullah.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the vinegar is a lilac.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a lilac.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__