that if the araneidalness does not occur the overpowering Welshman occurs and the arousing referral happens is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the fall occurs and the absolution does not occur is not false if the araneidalness occurs. sent2: the fact that not the substantive but the changelessness happens does not hold. sent3: the falling happens. sent4: the depolarization occurs. sent5: the soberingness occurs and/or the marliness happens. sent6: the unchristianness does not occur. sent7: the antiphonary does not occur. sent8: the least happens but the arousing imprecation does not occur. sent9: that both the orchestralness and the basting occurs does not hold. sent10: the spatiotemporalness does not occur if the fact that the marliness occurs hold. sent11: the propositioning does not occur if the arousing housewife occurs. sent12: the fact that the heterozygousness and the araneidalness happens is not true. sent13: if the marliness occurs the spatiotemporalness occurs. sent14: the spatiotemporalness does not occur if the sobering occurs. sent15: if the spatiotemporalness does not occur that the heterozygousness and the araneidalness happens is not correct. sent16: the fact that the barbing devisal occurs hold. sent17: if that the spatiotemporalness does not occur is correct then that that the heterozygousness occurs but the araneidalness does not occur is incorrect is true. sent18: the declarativeness occurs if the arousing lidar does not occur. sent19: both the overpowering Welshman and the barbing devisal happens if the changelessness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that not the gleaming but the arousing referral happens is not correct then the heterozygousness happens. sent21: if that the non-substantiveness and the changelessness occurs does not hold then the changelessness does not occur. sent22: the myelinicness does not occur if the incomparableness happens. sent23: the arousing housewife happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the gleam but the arousing referral happens is incorrect.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the heterozygousness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the araneidalness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the heterozygousness happens but the araneidalness does not occur.; sent5 & sent14 & sent10 -> int3: the spatiotemporalness does not occur.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the fact that both the heterozygousness and the non-araneidalness happens is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the gleam does not occur and the arousing referral occurs.; int6 -> int7: the arousing referral occurs.; sent21 & sent2 -> int8: the changelessness does not occur.; sent19 & int8 -> int9: the overpowering Welshman occurs and the barbing devisal happens.; int9 -> int10: the overpowering Welshman happens.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the overpowering Welshman occurs and the arousing referral occurs.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the falling but not the absolution happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if the araneidalness does not occur the overpowering Welshman occurs and the arousing referral happens is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fall occurs and the absolution does not occur is not false if the araneidalness occurs. sent2: the fact that not the substantive but the changelessness happens does not hold. sent3: the falling happens. sent4: the depolarization occurs. sent5: the soberingness occurs and/or the marliness happens. sent6: the unchristianness does not occur. sent7: the antiphonary does not occur. sent8: the least happens but the arousing imprecation does not occur. sent9: that both the orchestralness and the basting occurs does not hold. sent10: the spatiotemporalness does not occur if the fact that the marliness occurs hold. sent11: the propositioning does not occur if the arousing housewife occurs. sent12: the fact that the heterozygousness and the araneidalness happens is not true. sent13: if the marliness occurs the spatiotemporalness occurs. sent14: the spatiotemporalness does not occur if the sobering occurs. sent15: if the spatiotemporalness does not occur that the heterozygousness and the araneidalness happens is not correct. sent16: the fact that the barbing devisal occurs hold. sent17: if that the spatiotemporalness does not occur is correct then that that the heterozygousness occurs but the araneidalness does not occur is incorrect is true. sent18: the declarativeness occurs if the arousing lidar does not occur. sent19: both the overpowering Welshman and the barbing devisal happens if the changelessness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that not the gleaming but the arousing referral happens is not correct then the heterozygousness happens. sent21: if that the non-substantiveness and the changelessness occurs does not hold then the changelessness does not occur. sent22: the myelinicness does not occur if the incomparableness happens. sent23: the arousing housewife happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the gleam but the arousing referral happens is incorrect.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the heterozygousness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the araneidalness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the heterozygousness happens but the araneidalness does not occur.; sent5 & sent14 & sent10 -> int3: the spatiotemporalness does not occur.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the fact that both the heterozygousness and the non-araneidalness happens is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the gleam does not occur and the arousing referral occurs.; int6 -> int7: the arousing referral occurs.; sent21 & sent2 -> int8: the changelessness does not occur.; sent19 & int8 -> int9: the overpowering Welshman occurs and the barbing devisal happens.; int9 -> int10: the overpowering Welshman happens.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the overpowering Welshman occurs and the arousing referral occurs.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__