the hunter-gatherer segregates Tiamat.
sent1: if there is something such that it is a kind of a syllogism the tanka is a wash. sent2: the tanka does wash. sent3: if the color is not a study the hunter-gatherer does segregate Tiamat. sent4: if the color is not a syllogism then the tanka is prandial. sent5: something does not segregate Tiamat if it is a syllogism. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a syllogism is not true the tanka is both a study and a wash. sent7: there exists something such that it is a syllogism. sent8: the fact that if the tanka studies the fact that the color is not a kind of a streamliner but it does studies is not right is right.
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the tanka does study and is a wash.; int1 -> int2: the tanka does study.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the color is not a kind of a streamliner but it is a study does not hold.;
there is something such that it is not non-prandial.
$hypothesis$ = the hunter-gatherer segregates Tiamat. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is a kind of a syllogism the tanka is a wash. sent2: the tanka does wash. sent3: if the color is not a study the hunter-gatherer does segregate Tiamat. sent4: if the color is not a syllogism then the tanka is prandial. sent5: something does not segregate Tiamat if it is a syllogism. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a syllogism is not true the tanka is both a study and a wash. sent7: there exists something such that it is a syllogism. sent8: the fact that if the tanka studies the fact that the color is not a kind of a streamliner but it does studies is not right is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the tanka does study and is a wash.; int1 -> int2: the tanka does study.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the color is not a kind of a streamliner but it is a study does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__