the scrubber is a kind of an approach and is a sayeret.
sent1: something does howl candelabrum if that it does not grumble possession or it is not indecent or both is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the scrubber is an approach and a sayeret is incorrect if the clouding is not a scheme. sent3: if the clouding howls candelabrum the fact that it does stint axle is right. sent4: the clouding is not unsocial if it does not grumble possession and/or is not indecent. sent5: the scrubber is an approach but it does not stint axle. sent6: the snowball is unsocial. sent7: the snowball does not scheme. sent8: if something stints axle it is not a scheme. sent9: if the snowball is a endoderm it is unsocial and it is not a dystrophy. sent10: the clouding is an approach if the fact that it does not stint axle or it does scheme or both is not true. sent11: if the clouding is not unsocial then that the snowball is unsocial but it is not a kind of a dystrophy is wrong. sent12: the abrasive is not a scheme. sent13: if that something does grumble possession and/or is not indecent is not correct then it howls candelabrum. sent14: the snowball is a kind of a endoderm.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clouding either does not grumble possession or is not indecent or both.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the clouding is not unsocial.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the snowball is unsocial and is not a dystrophy does not hold.; sent9 & sent14 -> int3: the snowball is unsocial but it is not a kind of a dystrophy.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the clouding does not grumble possession and/or it is not indecent is incorrect.; sent1 -> int6: the clouding does howl candelabrum if the fact that it does not grumble possession or it is decent or both is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the clouding howls candelabrum.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the fact that the clouding does stint axle is not wrong.; sent8 -> int9: the clouding is not a scheme if it stints axle.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the clouding is not a scheme.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the scrubber is an approach and a sayeret.
sent5 -> int11: the scrubber is an approach.;
$hypothesis$ = the scrubber is a kind of an approach and is a sayeret. ; $context$ = sent1: something does howl candelabrum if that it does not grumble possession or it is not indecent or both is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the scrubber is an approach and a sayeret is incorrect if the clouding is not a scheme. sent3: if the clouding howls candelabrum the fact that it does stint axle is right. sent4: the clouding is not unsocial if it does not grumble possession and/or is not indecent. sent5: the scrubber is an approach but it does not stint axle. sent6: the snowball is unsocial. sent7: the snowball does not scheme. sent8: if something stints axle it is not a scheme. sent9: if the snowball is a endoderm it is unsocial and it is not a dystrophy. sent10: the clouding is an approach if the fact that it does not stint axle or it does scheme or both is not true. sent11: if the clouding is not unsocial then that the snowball is unsocial but it is not a kind of a dystrophy is wrong. sent12: the abrasive is not a scheme. sent13: if that something does grumble possession and/or is not indecent is not correct then it howls candelabrum. sent14: the snowball is a kind of a endoderm. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clouding either does not grumble possession or is not indecent or both.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the clouding is not unsocial.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the snowball is unsocial and is not a dystrophy does not hold.; sent9 & sent14 -> int3: the snowball is unsocial but it is not a kind of a dystrophy.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the clouding does not grumble possession and/or it is not indecent is incorrect.; sent1 -> int6: the clouding does howl candelabrum if the fact that it does not grumble possession or it is decent or both is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the clouding howls candelabrum.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the fact that the clouding does stint axle is not wrong.; sent8 -> int9: the clouding is not a scheme if it stints axle.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the clouding is not a scheme.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__