that the lamination yields that the conventionalness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the reigning phillipsite happens. sent2: the obscenity occurs. sent3: the conventionalness happens if both the non-introversiveness and the skiing occurs. sent4: if the elegantness occurs and the lamination occurs then the outriding does not occur. sent5: the reigning necrology does not occur or the nonhierarchicalness occurs or both. sent6: if the reigning phillipsite does not occur then the fact that the outriding does not occur and the introversiveness does not occur is wrong. sent7: the staling aphrodisiac happens. sent8: the deleting occurs. sent9: if the navalness does not occur the thunk happens. sent10: the skiing and the reigning phillipsite happens if the fact that the reigning necrology does not occur is not false. sent11: the smashing Thunderer does not occur and the staling homophone occurs. sent12: the reigning necrology is prevented by that the reigning necrology does not occur and/or the nonhierarchicalness occurs. sent13: that the Hindustani happens is not incorrect if the staling oolong does not occur. sent14: the ataxicness does not occur. sent15: the introversiveness does not occur if the elegantness does not occur. sent16: the strip does not occur. sent17: the outriding occurs and the appreciation occurs. sent18: the press occurs. sent19: the wear does not occur or the smashing megillah occurs or both. sent20: the quarrel does not occur if the lamination does not occur. sent21: that the darkening does not occur is caused by that the smashing naught does not occur. sent22: the impropriety does not occur and the handling happens. sent23: the reigning necrology happens or the nonhierarchicalness occurs or both. sent24: that the nightwork occurs is prevented by that the purveyance and the bettering occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the elegantness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lamination happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the elegantness occurs and the lamination occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the outriding does not occur.; sent17 -> int3: the outriding happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the elegantness does not occur.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: that the introversiveness does not occur is correct.; sent12 & sent5 -> int7: the reigning necrology does not occur.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: both the skiing and the reigning phillipsite happens.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the skiing happens is not incorrect.; int6 & int9 -> int10: not the introversiveness but the skiing occurs.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the conventionalness occurs.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the quarrelling does not occur but the rain occurs is correct.
$hypothesis$ = that the lamination yields that the conventionalness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the reigning phillipsite happens. sent2: the obscenity occurs. sent3: the conventionalness happens if both the non-introversiveness and the skiing occurs. sent4: if the elegantness occurs and the lamination occurs then the outriding does not occur. sent5: the reigning necrology does not occur or the nonhierarchicalness occurs or both. sent6: if the reigning phillipsite does not occur then the fact that the outriding does not occur and the introversiveness does not occur is wrong. sent7: the staling aphrodisiac happens. sent8: the deleting occurs. sent9: if the navalness does not occur the thunk happens. sent10: the skiing and the reigning phillipsite happens if the fact that the reigning necrology does not occur is not false. sent11: the smashing Thunderer does not occur and the staling homophone occurs. sent12: the reigning necrology is prevented by that the reigning necrology does not occur and/or the nonhierarchicalness occurs. sent13: that the Hindustani happens is not incorrect if the staling oolong does not occur. sent14: the ataxicness does not occur. sent15: the introversiveness does not occur if the elegantness does not occur. sent16: the strip does not occur. sent17: the outriding occurs and the appreciation occurs. sent18: the press occurs. sent19: the wear does not occur or the smashing megillah occurs or both. sent20: the quarrel does not occur if the lamination does not occur. sent21: that the darkening does not occur is caused by that the smashing naught does not occur. sent22: the impropriety does not occur and the handling happens. sent23: the reigning necrology happens or the nonhierarchicalness occurs or both. sent24: that the nightwork occurs is prevented by that the purveyance and the bettering occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the elegantness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lamination happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the elegantness occurs and the lamination occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the outriding does not occur.; sent17 -> int3: the outriding happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the elegantness does not occur.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: that the introversiveness does not occur is correct.; sent12 & sent5 -> int7: the reigning necrology does not occur.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: both the skiing and the reigning phillipsite happens.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the skiing happens is not incorrect.; int6 & int9 -> int10: not the introversiveness but the skiing occurs.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the conventionalness occurs.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__