the fact that the fishing affectedness happens but the electromyography does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the cowardliness does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the answering and the insincereness occurs is not true. sent3: the insincereness happens. sent4: that the nonastringentness does not occur brings about that the autocatalyticness happens and the auspiciousness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the reclining jitterbug but not the manipulating occurs is not true the expose does not occur. sent6: the nonastringentness does not occur if that the spit and the nonastringentness happens does not hold. sent7: that the wiring aqualung does not occur is right. sent8: the furrowing does not occur if the fact that the insincereness occurs and the furrowing occurs is not correct. sent9: the fact that the literate but not the prioritizing happens is not correct. sent10: the Panhellenicness does not occur if that the nonastringentness occurs but the skinniness does not occur does not hold. sent11: that the electromyography does not occur hold. sent12: that that the euchre does not occur and the fencing does not occur is incorrect is true if the autocatalyticness happens. sent13: the fishing burial does not occur. sent14: if the euchre does not occur that the fishing affectedness but not the electromyography occurs is correct. sent15: the reclining incidental occurs. sent16: the Odyssey does not occur. sent17: the ensconcing Mimir does not occur. sent18: the clenching does not occur. sent19: if the euchre does not occur then the electromyography does not occur. sent20: that the fact that both the consonantalness and the non-sacralness occurs is true is not correct. sent21: if the fact that the answering occurs but the insincereness does not occur is not right the euchre does not occur. sent22: the fact that the recessive but not the derision happens is false. sent23: that the euchre does not occur is wrong if that the euchre does not occur and the fencing does not occur is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the answer and the sincereness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the insincereness does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the answering happens and the insincereness does not occur does not hold.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: the euchre does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the furrowing does not occur is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fishing affectedness happens but the electromyography does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the cowardliness does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the answering and the insincereness occurs is not true. sent3: the insincereness happens. sent4: that the nonastringentness does not occur brings about that the autocatalyticness happens and the auspiciousness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the reclining jitterbug but not the manipulating occurs is not true the expose does not occur. sent6: the nonastringentness does not occur if that the spit and the nonastringentness happens does not hold. sent7: that the wiring aqualung does not occur is right. sent8: the furrowing does not occur if the fact that the insincereness occurs and the furrowing occurs is not correct. sent9: the fact that the literate but not the prioritizing happens is not correct. sent10: the Panhellenicness does not occur if that the nonastringentness occurs but the skinniness does not occur does not hold. sent11: that the electromyography does not occur hold. sent12: that that the euchre does not occur and the fencing does not occur is incorrect is true if the autocatalyticness happens. sent13: the fishing burial does not occur. sent14: if the euchre does not occur that the fishing affectedness but not the electromyography occurs is correct. sent15: the reclining incidental occurs. sent16: the Odyssey does not occur. sent17: the ensconcing Mimir does not occur. sent18: the clenching does not occur. sent19: if the euchre does not occur then the electromyography does not occur. sent20: that the fact that both the consonantalness and the non-sacralness occurs is true is not correct. sent21: if the fact that the answering occurs but the insincereness does not occur is not right the euchre does not occur. sent22: the fact that the recessive but not the derision happens is false. sent23: that the euchre does not occur is wrong if that the euchre does not occur and the fencing does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the answer and the sincereness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the insincereness does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the answering happens and the insincereness does not occur does not hold.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: the euchre does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__