that the elephant-tusk is a kind of technological thing that does expense obscenity is not true.
sent1: if the decadent does not shampoo graphite then that the elephant-tusk is not a Bucephala and it does not concern waveform is incorrect. sent2: that the elephant-tusk is technological and does expense obscenity does not hold if there exists something such that it does concern waveform. sent3: if the buckshot does expense obscenity the containership expense obscenity. sent4: if the buckshot is Tantric then it does expense obscenity. sent5: if something is a Bucephala then that it is technological is not false. sent6: if the containership expenses obscenity the elephant-tusk does expenses obscenity. sent7: the containership is a kind of a Bucephala. sent8: if there is something such that that it is a swimmeret that is a greensand is not right then the decadent does not shampoo graphite. sent9: something is a kind of a Bucephala if the fact that it is not a Bucephala and does not concern waveform is not true. sent10: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a swimmeret and it is a greensand does not hold.
the elephant-tusk is technological and it does expense obscenity.
sent5 -> int1: the elephant-tusk is technological if it is a Bucephala.; sent9 -> int2: if the fact that the elephant-tusk is not a Bucephala and it does not concern waveform is false that it is a kind of a Bucephala hold.; sent10 & sent8 -> int3: the decadent does not shampoo graphite.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that the elephant-tusk is not a Bucephala and it does not concern waveform is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the elephant-tusk is a Bucephala.; int1 & int5 -> int6: the elephant-tusk is technological.;
$hypothesis$ = that the elephant-tusk is a kind of technological thing that does expense obscenity is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the decadent does not shampoo graphite then that the elephant-tusk is not a Bucephala and it does not concern waveform is incorrect. sent2: that the elephant-tusk is technological and does expense obscenity does not hold if there exists something such that it does concern waveform. sent3: if the buckshot does expense obscenity the containership expense obscenity. sent4: if the buckshot is Tantric then it does expense obscenity. sent5: if something is a Bucephala then that it is technological is not false. sent6: if the containership expenses obscenity the elephant-tusk does expenses obscenity. sent7: the containership is a kind of a Bucephala. sent8: if there is something such that that it is a swimmeret that is a greensand is not right then the decadent does not shampoo graphite. sent9: something is a kind of a Bucephala if the fact that it is not a Bucephala and does not concern waveform is not true. sent10: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a swimmeret and it is a greensand does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__