the batting is not a pincer and turns.
sent1: the mammee is not a monogamist and/or does not protuberate microgauss if the fact that the arsenide is not a kind of a monogamist is true. sent2: the batting turns. sent3: if the stamina is permissible then that the actinomycin is a repeat but it does not incorporate is false. sent4: the actinomycin is a repeat that does not incorporate. sent5: if the mammee does not protuberate microgauss then the batting is not a pincer. sent6: if the aluminate is permissible but it is not a puka the arsenide is not a kind of a monogamist. sent7: the batting is not a pincer if that the mammee is a kind of a monogamist is false. sent8: the aluminate is permissible but it is not a kind of a puka if the stamina is not permissible. sent9: the aluminate incorporates.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stamina is permissible.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the actinomycin is a repeat that does not incorporate is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the stamina is not permissible.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the aluminate is both not impermissible and not a puka.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the arsenide is not a monogamist.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the mammee either is not a kind of a monogamist or does not protuberate microgauss or both.; int6 & sent7 & sent5 -> int7: the fact that the batting is not a pincer is correct.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the batting is not a pincer and turns. ; $context$ = sent1: the mammee is not a monogamist and/or does not protuberate microgauss if the fact that the arsenide is not a kind of a monogamist is true. sent2: the batting turns. sent3: if the stamina is permissible then that the actinomycin is a repeat but it does not incorporate is false. sent4: the actinomycin is a repeat that does not incorporate. sent5: if the mammee does not protuberate microgauss then the batting is not a pincer. sent6: if the aluminate is permissible but it is not a puka the arsenide is not a kind of a monogamist. sent7: the batting is not a pincer if that the mammee is a kind of a monogamist is false. sent8: the aluminate is permissible but it is not a kind of a puka if the stamina is not permissible. sent9: the aluminate incorporates. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stamina is permissible.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the actinomycin is a repeat that does not incorporate is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the stamina is not permissible.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the aluminate is both not impermissible and not a puka.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the arsenide is not a monogamist.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the mammee either is not a kind of a monogamist or does not protuberate microgauss or both.; int6 & sent7 & sent5 -> int7: the fact that the batting is not a pincer is correct.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__