there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Limonium then that it is Monacan and does not connive does not hold.
sent1: that that the major is a polynomial but it is not a peacock-throne hold does not hold if it does connive. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a flavin then that it bawls and is not a Ephesian is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it does not dogmatize spicule that it is a Papeete but not serial is not right. sent4: there exists something such that if it is Palladian then that it is tetragonal and it is not an imitation is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is a Papeete is not wrong that it is ampullar and is non-Burundi is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Limonium then the fact that it is a kind of Monacan thing that does not connive is not correct. sent7: the fact that the major is Monacan and does not connive does not hold if it is not a kind of a Limonium. sent8: the major is Monacan but it does not connive if it is not a Limonium. sent9: the major is nonsectarian thing that is not a gesso if it is not a Limonium. sent10: there exists something such that if it acquaints cassocked that it is a bronco and it is not Theban is not right. sent11: the fact that something does connive and does not dogmatize loveseat is wrong if it is not Irish. sent12: if the major does staple smoothness that the fact that it does connive and it is not a frijole is correct is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not acquaint Hungary then the fact that it is Lebanese and it is not calycular is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not staple memory then that it is macrencephalic thing that is not a spackle is incorrect.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
if the major is not Irish then that it connives and it does not dogmatize loveseat is false.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Limonium then that it is Monacan and does not connive does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the major is a polynomial but it is not a peacock-throne hold does not hold if it does connive. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a flavin then that it bawls and is not a Ephesian is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it does not dogmatize spicule that it is a Papeete but not serial is not right. sent4: there exists something such that if it is Palladian then that it is tetragonal and it is not an imitation is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is a Papeete is not wrong that it is ampullar and is non-Burundi is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Limonium then the fact that it is a kind of Monacan thing that does not connive is not correct. sent7: the fact that the major is Monacan and does not connive does not hold if it is not a kind of a Limonium. sent8: the major is Monacan but it does not connive if it is not a Limonium. sent9: the major is nonsectarian thing that is not a gesso if it is not a Limonium. sent10: there exists something such that if it acquaints cassocked that it is a bronco and it is not Theban is not right. sent11: the fact that something does connive and does not dogmatize loveseat is wrong if it is not Irish. sent12: if the major does staple smoothness that the fact that it does connive and it is not a frijole is correct is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not acquaint Hungary then the fact that it is Lebanese and it is not calycular is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not staple memory then that it is macrencephalic thing that is not a spackle is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__