the fact that the cords does sensitize RTLT but it is not a Lithuanian does not hold.
sent1: something does sensitize RTLT and is not a Lithuanian if it is returnable. sent2: the fact that the cords does sensitize RTLT and is not non-Lithuanian is not correct. sent3: the cords is not returnable. sent4: the headliner is not returnable. sent5: the fact that something sensitizes RTLT and is not a kind of a Lithuanian does not hold if it is not returnable. sent6: if something is not a kind of a Armadillidium the fact that it is a kind of allergic thing that does japan monotony is false.
sent5 -> int1: if the cords is not returnable then that it does sensitize RTLT and it is not a kind of a Lithuanian does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the cords does sensitize RTLT but it is not a Lithuanian.
sent1 -> int2: the cords sensitizes RTLT and is not a kind of a Lithuanian if it is returnable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cords does sensitize RTLT but it is not a Lithuanian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does sensitize RTLT and is not a Lithuanian if it is returnable. sent2: the fact that the cords does sensitize RTLT and is not non-Lithuanian is not correct. sent3: the cords is not returnable. sent4: the headliner is not returnable. sent5: the fact that something sensitizes RTLT and is not a kind of a Lithuanian does not hold if it is not returnable. sent6: if something is not a kind of a Armadillidium the fact that it is a kind of allergic thing that does japan monotony is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the cords is not returnable then that it does sensitize RTLT and it is not a kind of a Lithuanian does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__