that the tortoise is a distillate but it does not subside fleece does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the tortoise is a kind of a Acer that does subside fleece is wrong then it does not subside fleece. sent2: the fact that the tortoise is a kind of a distillate and it does subside fleece is not true. sent3: the fact that the tortoise is a distillate and it subsides fleece is wrong if there exists something such that it is communist. sent4: that the wafer is a kind of a distillate that does idealize wafer is incorrect. sent5: if something is communist then the fact that that the tortoise is a kind of a distillate and does not subside fleece is correct is not right. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is communist is true. sent7: the fact that the tortoise is a distillate that is a Basiliscus is not right if there is something such that it is a noncandidate. sent8: if something is communist then it is a distillate. sent9: if something is a kind of a distillate then the fact that the tortoise is an industry and is not a kind of a pyrites is not correct. sent10: that the tortoise does idealize polypropenonitrile and is not a kind of a communist is false. sent11: there exists something such that it subsides fleece. sent12: if something is communist then the fact that the Bluegrass is catabolic but not a loved does not hold. sent13: the fact that the tortoise is a kind of a noncandidate and is chauvinistic is incorrect. sent14: there is something such that it is a distillate. sent15: that the swindler does subside fleece and guards Echinocereus is not right if there is something such that it is pneumogastric. sent16: if there is something such that it is a onrush then the fact that that the tortoise is a kind of a Luddite and it is a communist is wrong is not false. sent17: the fact that the tortoise is both a onrush and communist is wrong. sent18: that the tortoise is a bonfire and a communist is not right.
sent6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the tortoise is a distillate but it does not subside fleece.
sent8 -> int1: the tortoise is a distillate if it is communist.;
$hypothesis$ = that the tortoise is a distillate but it does not subside fleece does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the tortoise is a kind of a Acer that does subside fleece is wrong then it does not subside fleece. sent2: the fact that the tortoise is a kind of a distillate and it does subside fleece is not true. sent3: the fact that the tortoise is a distillate and it subsides fleece is wrong if there exists something such that it is communist. sent4: that the wafer is a kind of a distillate that does idealize wafer is incorrect. sent5: if something is communist then the fact that that the tortoise is a kind of a distillate and does not subside fleece is correct is not right. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is communist is true. sent7: the fact that the tortoise is a distillate that is a Basiliscus is not right if there is something such that it is a noncandidate. sent8: if something is communist then it is a distillate. sent9: if something is a kind of a distillate then the fact that the tortoise is an industry and is not a kind of a pyrites is not correct. sent10: that the tortoise does idealize polypropenonitrile and is not a kind of a communist is false. sent11: there exists something such that it subsides fleece. sent12: if something is communist then the fact that the Bluegrass is catabolic but not a loved does not hold. sent13: the fact that the tortoise is a kind of a noncandidate and is chauvinistic is incorrect. sent14: there is something such that it is a distillate. sent15: that the swindler does subside fleece and guards Echinocereus is not right if there is something such that it is pneumogastric. sent16: if there is something such that it is a onrush then the fact that that the tortoise is a kind of a Luddite and it is a communist is wrong is not false. sent17: the fact that the tortoise is both a onrush and communist is wrong. sent18: that the tortoise is a bonfire and a communist is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__