the fact that the exon is both bacteremic and a Melinae is wrong.
sent1: that if the diaphragm is not bacteremic then the fact that the exon is bacteremic and is a redfish hold is true. sent2: there is something such that it is not a revocation and/or it is a Medicaid. sent3: the hippoboscid is a kind of a revocation. sent4: if that the diaphragm is bacteremic is not true the exon is a redfish. sent5: the settle is not an isomorphism but a redfish if it does not glom. sent6: the fact that the hippoboscid is not a kind of a revocation and/or it is a kind of a Medicaid does not hold. sent7: the diaphragm is not bacteremic if there exists something such that that it is not a revocation and/or it is a Medicaid is false. sent8: there exists something such that it is a revocation. sent9: if the diaphragm is a Melinae then the fact that the stool is not bacteremic and/or it is a kind of a Georgia is not correct. sent10: the diaphragm is not bacteremic if the fact that there is something such that that it is a revocation or it is a kind of a Medicaid or both does not hold hold. sent11: the hippoboscid is both a Melinae and a revocation if the exon is not a Melinae. sent12: that the exon is a Melinae is right. sent13: the exon is a kind of a redfish. sent14: that the exon is not a redfish and/or it is capitular is incorrect.
sent6 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a revocation and/or it is a Medicaid is false.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the diaphragm is not bacteremic.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the exon is bacteremic thing that is a redfish.; int3 -> int4: the exon is bacteremic.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the exon is bacteremic a Melinae is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the exon is both bacteremic and a Melinae is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the diaphragm is not bacteremic then the fact that the exon is bacteremic and is a redfish hold is true. sent2: there is something such that it is not a revocation and/or it is a Medicaid. sent3: the hippoboscid is a kind of a revocation. sent4: if that the diaphragm is bacteremic is not true the exon is a redfish. sent5: the settle is not an isomorphism but a redfish if it does not glom. sent6: the fact that the hippoboscid is not a kind of a revocation and/or it is a kind of a Medicaid does not hold. sent7: the diaphragm is not bacteremic if there exists something such that that it is not a revocation and/or it is a Medicaid is false. sent8: there exists something such that it is a revocation. sent9: if the diaphragm is a Melinae then the fact that the stool is not bacteremic and/or it is a kind of a Georgia is not correct. sent10: the diaphragm is not bacteremic if the fact that there is something such that that it is a revocation or it is a kind of a Medicaid or both does not hold hold. sent11: the hippoboscid is both a Melinae and a revocation if the exon is not a Melinae. sent12: that the exon is a Melinae is right. sent13: the exon is a kind of a redfish. sent14: that the exon is not a redfish and/or it is capitular is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a revocation and/or it is a Medicaid is false.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the diaphragm is not bacteremic.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the exon is bacteremic thing that is a redfish.; int3 -> int4: the exon is bacteremic.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__