the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is non-corvine is true then that it is not a laugh and it is a kind of a Burmese is incorrect is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not unplayable then the fact that it is not a blenny and it is caesural is not correct. sent2: if the colossus does not luxuriate cerise that it is non-coronary and it is corvine is wrong. sent3: the fact that something does not brake but it is a crop is not true if that it does not laugh is correct. sent4: there exists something such that if that it does not single is correct then the fact that it is not a kind of a calcium and it is an indecisiveness is not true. sent5: the fact that there is something such that if it is not corvine it is not a laugh and is a kind of a Burmese hold. sent6: if that the punnet is not corvine is true the fact that it is not a laugh and it is a kind of a Burmese does not hold. sent7: if the punnet is not corvine that it is a laugh and it is a Burmese is incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it is corvine then the fact that it does not laugh and it is Burmese is not correct. sent9: if the punnet is corvine then the fact that it is not a kind of a laugh and it is a kind of a Burmese is not right. sent10: the punnet is not a laugh but a Burmese if it is not corvine. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is necked hold then the fact that it is non-fundamentalist thing that bathes ozonosphere is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is non-corvine then that it is a laugh and it is a Burmese is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a purple then the fact that the fact that it is not a bairn and is impolitic is true is not correct.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the punnet is not a brakes but it is a crop is incorrect if it does not laugh.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is non-corvine is true then that it is not a laugh and it is a kind of a Burmese is incorrect is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not unplayable then the fact that it is not a blenny and it is caesural is not correct. sent2: if the colossus does not luxuriate cerise that it is non-coronary and it is corvine is wrong. sent3: the fact that something does not brake but it is a crop is not true if that it does not laugh is correct. sent4: there exists something such that if that it does not single is correct then the fact that it is not a kind of a calcium and it is an indecisiveness is not true. sent5: the fact that there is something such that if it is not corvine it is not a laugh and is a kind of a Burmese hold. sent6: if that the punnet is not corvine is true the fact that it is not a laugh and it is a kind of a Burmese does not hold. sent7: if the punnet is not corvine that it is a laugh and it is a Burmese is incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it is corvine then the fact that it does not laugh and it is Burmese is not correct. sent9: if the punnet is corvine then the fact that it is not a kind of a laugh and it is a kind of a Burmese is not right. sent10: the punnet is not a laugh but a Burmese if it is not corvine. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is necked hold then the fact that it is non-fundamentalist thing that bathes ozonosphere is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is non-corvine then that it is a laugh and it is a Burmese is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a purple then the fact that the fact that it is not a bairn and is impolitic is true is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__