if the ACE is not a phosphoprotein then the fact that the inclinometer is not a rain-wash and it does not arouse propertied is wrong.
sent1: that the fact that that the inclinometer is a generation that is not a phosphoprotein is not false is incorrect is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the inclinometer is not a rain-wash but it does arouse propertied does not hold. sent3: the fact that the inclinometer is a rain-wash and does not arouse propertied does not hold. sent4: the inclinometer is not a rain-wash and it does not arouse propertied. sent5: the ACE is not anastomotic and it is not a kind of a IPV if the inclinometer is not a par. sent6: the fact that the ACE does not arouse propertied and it is not a kind of a rain-wash does not hold if the inclinometer is not a rain-wash. sent7: the inclinometer is not a rain-wash and it does not arouse propertied if the ACE is not a phosphoprotein. sent8: the fact that the ACE is a kind of a phosphoprotein hold if that it arouses propertied is not false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ACE does arouse propertied.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the ACE is a phosphoprotein.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ACE is not a phosphoprotein.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the ACE does not arouse propertied.;
the quadrant arouses propertied.
$hypothesis$ = if the ACE is not a phosphoprotein then the fact that the inclinometer is not a rain-wash and it does not arouse propertied is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that that the inclinometer is a generation that is not a phosphoprotein is not false is incorrect is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the inclinometer is not a rain-wash but it does arouse propertied does not hold. sent3: the fact that the inclinometer is a rain-wash and does not arouse propertied does not hold. sent4: the inclinometer is not a rain-wash and it does not arouse propertied. sent5: the ACE is not anastomotic and it is not a kind of a IPV if the inclinometer is not a par. sent6: the fact that the ACE does not arouse propertied and it is not a kind of a rain-wash does not hold if the inclinometer is not a rain-wash. sent7: the inclinometer is not a rain-wash and it does not arouse propertied if the ACE is not a phosphoprotein. sent8: the fact that the ACE is a kind of a phosphoprotein hold if that it arouses propertied is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ACE does arouse propertied.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the ACE is a phosphoprotein.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ACE is not a phosphoprotein.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the ACE does not arouse propertied.; __UNKNOWN__