the pseudopod is not anserine.
sent1: there is something such that that it is not anserine and it is a Congolese is not true. sent2: if something is a kind of a Plutarch and it is unlucky then it does not glare usufruct. sent3: that the felo-de-se is not anserine is right if there is something such that that it is not alive and is a Congolese is false. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it glares angiotensin and is sturdy is wrong. sent5: that the felo-de-se is a Congolese is correct. sent6: the dobson is not a Congolese if it is alive and is a jackknife-fish. sent7: if something that is a Congolese is anserine then it is not alive. sent8: that the pseudopod is not Congolese and not non-anserine is not correct. sent9: if something is both Congolese and alive the fact that it is not ethnocentric is not false. sent10: the pseudopod is unlucky. sent11: the felo-de-se is not a kind of a colliery. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is not logical and it is a kind of a sarcoptid is wrong. sent13: if something that is a Attic is tensile it does not rope Cricetidae. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Congolese and is anserine is false. sent15: the dobson is not anserine. sent16: the conch does not glare angiotensin if something glares conch. sent17: that the pseudopod is not anserine hold if there is something such that that it is not a jackknife-fish and does concoct dobson is not right. sent18: the dobson is non-ethnocentric. sent19: that the dobson is not a kind of a jackknife-fish and concocts dobson is not right if the felo-de-se is not ethnocentric. sent20: the felo-de-se does not concoct dobson if it is a Congolese and it is a kind of a jackknife-fish.
sent9 -> int1: the felo-de-se is not ethnocentric if it is Congolese thing that is alive.;
$hypothesis$ = the pseudopod is not anserine. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it is not anserine and it is a Congolese is not true. sent2: if something is a kind of a Plutarch and it is unlucky then it does not glare usufruct. sent3: that the felo-de-se is not anserine is right if there is something such that that it is not alive and is a Congolese is false. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it glares angiotensin and is sturdy is wrong. sent5: that the felo-de-se is a Congolese is correct. sent6: the dobson is not a Congolese if it is alive and is a jackknife-fish. sent7: if something that is a Congolese is anserine then it is not alive. sent8: that the pseudopod is not Congolese and not non-anserine is not correct. sent9: if something is both Congolese and alive the fact that it is not ethnocentric is not false. sent10: the pseudopod is unlucky. sent11: the felo-de-se is not a kind of a colliery. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is not logical and it is a kind of a sarcoptid is wrong. sent13: if something that is a Attic is tensile it does not rope Cricetidae. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Congolese and is anserine is false. sent15: the dobson is not anserine. sent16: the conch does not glare angiotensin if something glares conch. sent17: that the pseudopod is not anserine hold if there is something such that that it is not a jackknife-fish and does concoct dobson is not right. sent18: the dobson is non-ethnocentric. sent19: that the dobson is not a kind of a jackknife-fish and concocts dobson is not right if the felo-de-se is not ethnocentric. sent20: the felo-de-se does not concoct dobson if it is a Congolese and it is a kind of a jackknife-fish. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the felo-de-se is not ethnocentric if it is Congolese thing that is alive.; __UNKNOWN__