that something squats protrusion and it does equivocate is false.
sent1: the FET does squat protrusion if there exists something such that that either it does work or it is a bedside or both does not hold. sent2: the FET is not a sharp if the fact that the scrumpy suspends xi hold. sent3: that the FET works and/or it is sharp does not hold. sent4: the gulper is not a bedside. sent5: if that something squats protrusion or does not suspend xi or both is not right then it is a bedside. sent6: the fact that either the gulper does work or it is a bedside or both is not true. sent7: the FET is not a sharp. sent8: The xi suspends scrumpy. sent9: the scrumpy suspends xi. sent10: there is something such that it does equivocate. sent11: there is something such that it squats protrusion. sent12: the gulper does squat protrusion but it is not a bedside. sent13: something is not a works. sent14: something either works or is a bedside or both. sent15: if the scrumpy does suspend xi then the fact that the FET does equivocate and is not a sharp hold. sent16: there exists something such that it is not a bedside. sent17: the scrumpy does pod and it notches perijove. sent18: the simperer suspends xi and does not squat custodian.
sent15 & sent9 -> int1: the FET does equivocate but it is non-sharp.; int1 -> int2: the FET equivocates.; sent6 -> int3: there is something such that that that it is a works and/or it is a kind of a bedside hold is not true.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the FET does squat protrusion.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the FET does squat protrusion and equivocates.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the scrumpy is a preschooler and it is a kind of a bedside.
sent5 -> int6: if that the scrumpy either does squat protrusion or does not suspend xi or both does not hold then it is a bedside.;
$hypothesis$ = that something squats protrusion and it does equivocate is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the FET does squat protrusion if there exists something such that that either it does work or it is a bedside or both does not hold. sent2: the FET is not a sharp if the fact that the scrumpy suspends xi hold. sent3: that the FET works and/or it is sharp does not hold. sent4: the gulper is not a bedside. sent5: if that something squats protrusion or does not suspend xi or both is not right then it is a bedside. sent6: the fact that either the gulper does work or it is a bedside or both is not true. sent7: the FET is not a sharp. sent8: The xi suspends scrumpy. sent9: the scrumpy suspends xi. sent10: there is something such that it does equivocate. sent11: there is something such that it squats protrusion. sent12: the gulper does squat protrusion but it is not a bedside. sent13: something is not a works. sent14: something either works or is a bedside or both. sent15: if the scrumpy does suspend xi then the fact that the FET does equivocate and is not a sharp hold. sent16: there exists something such that it is not a bedside. sent17: the scrumpy does pod and it notches perijove. sent18: the simperer suspends xi and does not squat custodian. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent9 -> int1: the FET does equivocate but it is non-sharp.; int1 -> int2: the FET equivocates.; sent6 -> int3: there is something such that that that it is a works and/or it is a kind of a bedside hold is not true.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the FET does squat protrusion.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the FET does squat protrusion and equivocates.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__