the blastemalness does not occur.
sent1: that the revolting does not occur causes that the blastemalness happens and the arousing pet does not occur. sent2: the fact that not the downturn but the branch occurs is not correct. sent3: the transpiring occurs if the setup happens. sent4: if the breaststroking happens and the transpiring happens the numbing does not occur. sent5: the fact that the arousing pet does not occur but the blastemalness occurs does not hold if the numbing does not occur. sent6: if the blockage does not occur that that the protectiveness occurs and the blastemalness happens is not right is right. sent7: that the barbing reversed does not occur brings about that both the breaststroking and the regionalness occurs. sent8: the blockage does not occur if the Satanicness does not occur and the revolting does not occur. sent9: if that the fact that not the downturn but the branch occurs is not incorrect does not hold that the blockage does not occur is false. sent10: the non-regionalness results in that the breaststroking does not occur and the transpiring does not occur. sent11: if the overpowering Conospermum does not occur then the dairying does not occur and the leaner does not occur. sent12: the fact that the regionalness does not occur is true. sent13: if the protectiveness happens and the revolting occurs the Satanicness does not occur. sent14: if the blockage occurs the protectiveness happens. sent15: the blastemalness does not occur if the fact that the protectiveness occurs and the blastemalness occurs is false. sent16: the setup happens if the nomotheticness happens. sent17: the blastemalness does not occur if that the arousing pet does not occur and the blastemalness occurs is false. sent18: if the transpiring does not occur then the Satanicness occurs and the numbing happens.
sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the blockage happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the protectiveness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the revolting occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the protectiveness occurs and the revolting occurs.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the Satanicness does not occur.; sent10 & sent12 -> int5: the breaststroke does not occur and the transpiring does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the transpiring does not occur.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the Satanicness and the numbing happens.; int7 -> int8: the Satanicness occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the revolting does not occur.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the blastemalness happens but the arousing pet does not occur.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the demurrage happens.
$hypothesis$ = the blastemalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the revolting does not occur causes that the blastemalness happens and the arousing pet does not occur. sent2: the fact that not the downturn but the branch occurs is not correct. sent3: the transpiring occurs if the setup happens. sent4: if the breaststroking happens and the transpiring happens the numbing does not occur. sent5: the fact that the arousing pet does not occur but the blastemalness occurs does not hold if the numbing does not occur. sent6: if the blockage does not occur that that the protectiveness occurs and the blastemalness happens is not right is right. sent7: that the barbing reversed does not occur brings about that both the breaststroking and the regionalness occurs. sent8: the blockage does not occur if the Satanicness does not occur and the revolting does not occur. sent9: if that the fact that not the downturn but the branch occurs is not incorrect does not hold that the blockage does not occur is false. sent10: the non-regionalness results in that the breaststroking does not occur and the transpiring does not occur. sent11: if the overpowering Conospermum does not occur then the dairying does not occur and the leaner does not occur. sent12: the fact that the regionalness does not occur is true. sent13: if the protectiveness happens and the revolting occurs the Satanicness does not occur. sent14: if the blockage occurs the protectiveness happens. sent15: the blastemalness does not occur if the fact that the protectiveness occurs and the blastemalness occurs is false. sent16: the setup happens if the nomotheticness happens. sent17: the blastemalness does not occur if that the arousing pet does not occur and the blastemalness occurs is false. sent18: if the transpiring does not occur then the Satanicness occurs and the numbing happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the blockage happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the protectiveness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the revolting occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the protectiveness occurs and the revolting occurs.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the Satanicness does not occur.; sent10 & sent12 -> int5: the breaststroke does not occur and the transpiring does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the transpiring does not occur.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the Satanicness and the numbing happens.; int7 -> int8: the Satanicness occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the revolting does not occur.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the blastemalness happens but the arousing pet does not occur.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__