that the twinberry is a kind of an examiner that mopes is wrong.
sent1: something that is an examiner is a cubbyhole. sent2: something is offshore. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Kalki and is not an examiner. sent4: the twinberry is an examiner and it is a kind of a Kalki. sent5: the twinberry is a Kalki. sent6: there is something such that it mopes and is not an examiner. sent7: if something is not a Kalki the fact that it is a kind of an examiner that does mope is wrong. sent8: the twinberry is an examiner if something that is a kind of a Kalki does not mope. sent9: the twinberry is a kind of lean thing that pushes Rochambeau. sent10: the twinberry is inshore thing that contemplates majorette. sent11: the photon is expensive and it possesses. sent12: there is something such that it does mope and is not a Kalki. sent13: if the fact that the twinberry is not a surcharge is true then that it does not straighten seaworthiness and does not tsk is not right. sent14: if the fact that something does not straighten seaworthiness and it does not tsk is not correct then it is not a Krupp. sent15: there exists something such that that it is not a surcharge and/or it does not straighten seaworthiness does not hold. sent16: the twinberry does mope if something that is an examiner is not a Kalki. sent17: if something is inshore that it is not a Kalki and does not mope is wrong. sent18: if a Krupp is inshore then the fact that the twinberry mopes is true. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Kalki and does not mope is not correct the fact that the knoll is a kind of an examiner is correct. sent20: the twinberry is a Kalki and it is decorous. sent21: there is something such that it is a kind of a Krupp that is not inshore. sent22: if something that is a Krupp is not inshore the twinberry mopes. sent23: the caressing does not tsk if there exists something such that the fact that it does not surcharge or it does not straighten seaworthiness or both does not hold.
sent4 -> int1: that the twinberry is a kind of an examiner is not incorrect.; sent21 & sent22 -> int2: the twinberry does mope.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the twinberry is an examiner that mopes is false.
sent7 -> int3: that the twinberry is an examiner and it does mope does not hold if it is not a Kalki.; sent14 -> int4: the twinberry is not a Krupp if the fact that it does not straighten seaworthiness and does not tsk does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the twinberry is a kind of an examiner that mopes is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is an examiner is a cubbyhole. sent2: something is offshore. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Kalki and is not an examiner. sent4: the twinberry is an examiner and it is a kind of a Kalki. sent5: the twinberry is a Kalki. sent6: there is something such that it mopes and is not an examiner. sent7: if something is not a Kalki the fact that it is a kind of an examiner that does mope is wrong. sent8: the twinberry is an examiner if something that is a kind of a Kalki does not mope. sent9: the twinberry is a kind of lean thing that pushes Rochambeau. sent10: the twinberry is inshore thing that contemplates majorette. sent11: the photon is expensive and it possesses. sent12: there is something such that it does mope and is not a Kalki. sent13: if the fact that the twinberry is not a surcharge is true then that it does not straighten seaworthiness and does not tsk is not right. sent14: if the fact that something does not straighten seaworthiness and it does not tsk is not correct then it is not a Krupp. sent15: there exists something such that that it is not a surcharge and/or it does not straighten seaworthiness does not hold. sent16: the twinberry does mope if something that is an examiner is not a Kalki. sent17: if something is inshore that it is not a Kalki and does not mope is wrong. sent18: if a Krupp is inshore then the fact that the twinberry mopes is true. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Kalki and does not mope is not correct the fact that the knoll is a kind of an examiner is correct. sent20: the twinberry is a Kalki and it is decorous. sent21: there is something such that it is a kind of a Krupp that is not inshore. sent22: if something that is a Krupp is not inshore the twinberry mopes. sent23: the caressing does not tsk if there exists something such that the fact that it does not surcharge or it does not straighten seaworthiness or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the twinberry is a kind of an examiner is not incorrect.; sent21 & sent22 -> int2: the twinberry does mope.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__