that there is something such that if that it does not reflectorize benignity hold then it is a Potsdam and it is a kind of an impropriety is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it reflectorizes benignity it is a Potsdam and it is a kind of an impropriety. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not fernless it is ductless and it does reflectorize chimney. sent3: the chimney is a kind of a ritual that reflectorizes benignity if it is not a kind of a cloning. sent4: there is something such that if it does not reflectorize flex then the fact that it does reflectorize agent-in-place is not incorrect. sent5: if the chimney does not reflectorize benignity it is a Potsdam that is an impropriety. sent6: something reflectorizes reveille and it is a ratel if it does not reflectorize Black. sent7: there is something such that if it does not reflectorize benignity then it is a Potsdam. sent8: if the Black does not overboil then it sheers freedman and it is a Potsdam. sent9: if the chimney is not an yttrium it is a Potsdam. sent10: there is something such that if it does not draw hemolysin it draws briar and it does reflectorize lechwe. sent11: if the chimney is not gastrointestinal it draws membrane and does reflectorize die. sent12: the chimney is a Potsdam and an impropriety if it does reflectorize benignity. sent13: if something does not draw minyan it does draw viability and reflectorizes judas. sent14: if the chimney does not reflectorize benignity then it is an impropriety. sent15: the component is both a commemoration and a turning if it is not a kind of a Potsdam. sent16: the chimney is both unseasonable and not non-entozoic if it is not a kind of a Potsdam. sent17: there is something such that if that it does not draw Solomon's-seal hold then it comforts cilium and it is a immunogenicity. sent18: if the chimney does not reflectorize benignity then it is both a REIT and a backstroker. sent19: there exists something such that if it does not reflectorize benignity then it is a kind of an impropriety.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not reflectorize Black it does reflectorize reveille and it is a ratel.
sent6 -> int1: the lechwe does reflectorize reveille and is a kind of a ratel if that it does not reflectorize Black hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it does not reflectorize benignity hold then it is a Potsdam and it is a kind of an impropriety is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it reflectorizes benignity it is a Potsdam and it is a kind of an impropriety. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not fernless it is ductless and it does reflectorize chimney. sent3: the chimney is a kind of a ritual that reflectorizes benignity if it is not a kind of a cloning. sent4: there is something such that if it does not reflectorize flex then the fact that it does reflectorize agent-in-place is not incorrect. sent5: if the chimney does not reflectorize benignity it is a Potsdam that is an impropriety. sent6: something reflectorizes reveille and it is a ratel if it does not reflectorize Black. sent7: there is something such that if it does not reflectorize benignity then it is a Potsdam. sent8: if the Black does not overboil then it sheers freedman and it is a Potsdam. sent9: if the chimney is not an yttrium it is a Potsdam. sent10: there is something such that if it does not draw hemolysin it draws briar and it does reflectorize lechwe. sent11: if the chimney is not gastrointestinal it draws membrane and does reflectorize die. sent12: the chimney is a Potsdam and an impropriety if it does reflectorize benignity. sent13: if something does not draw minyan it does draw viability and reflectorizes judas. sent14: if the chimney does not reflectorize benignity then it is an impropriety. sent15: the component is both a commemoration and a turning if it is not a kind of a Potsdam. sent16: the chimney is both unseasonable and not non-entozoic if it is not a kind of a Potsdam. sent17: there is something such that if that it does not draw Solomon's-seal hold then it comforts cilium and it is a immunogenicity. sent18: if the chimney does not reflectorize benignity then it is both a REIT and a backstroker. sent19: there exists something such that if it does not reflectorize benignity then it is a kind of an impropriety. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__