there is something such that it is not near and it does denaturalize saber.
sent1: the fact that the acyl is a salting is not wrong if that the porthole does not salting and is a precaution is not correct. sent2: something is myalgic if it is unclear. sent3: the acyl is a osier if that the Argyrol is myalgic is true. sent4: the Argyrol is unclear if it is an eyed. sent5: the Argyrol is an eyed. sent6: something does not animate if it denaturalizes snowblindness and is a salting. sent7: if the acyl does not animate then the Moon is not near but it denaturalizes saber. sent8: something that is a osier does denaturalize snowblindness. sent9: there is nothing that is not a salting but a precaution.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the Argyrol is not well-defined.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the Argyrol is myalgic hold if it is unclear.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Argyrol is myalgic.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the acyl is a osier.; sent8 -> int5: the acyl does denaturalize snowblindness if it is a osier.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the acyl denaturalizes snowblindness.; sent9 -> int7: that the porthole is not a salting and is a precaution is not true.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the acyl is a kind of a salting.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the acyl denaturalizes snowblindness and it does salt.; sent6 -> int10: if the acyl denaturalizes snowblindness and does salt then it is not animate.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the acyl is not animate.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the Moon is non-near thing that does denaturalize saber.; int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not near and it does denaturalize saber. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the acyl is a salting is not wrong if that the porthole does not salting and is a precaution is not correct. sent2: something is myalgic if it is unclear. sent3: the acyl is a osier if that the Argyrol is myalgic is true. sent4: the Argyrol is unclear if it is an eyed. sent5: the Argyrol is an eyed. sent6: something does not animate if it denaturalizes snowblindness and is a salting. sent7: if the acyl does not animate then the Moon is not near but it denaturalizes saber. sent8: something that is a osier does denaturalize snowblindness. sent9: there is nothing that is not a salting but a precaution. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the Argyrol is not well-defined.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the Argyrol is myalgic hold if it is unclear.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Argyrol is myalgic.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the acyl is a osier.; sent8 -> int5: the acyl does denaturalize snowblindness if it is a osier.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the acyl denaturalizes snowblindness.; sent9 -> int7: that the porthole is not a salting and is a precaution is not true.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the acyl is a kind of a salting.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the acyl denaturalizes snowblindness and it does salt.; sent6 -> int10: if the acyl denaturalizes snowblindness and does salt then it is not animate.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the acyl is not animate.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the Moon is non-near thing that does denaturalize saber.; int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__