there is something such that if it is not a Ceratodontidae the fact that it is not acatalectic and it is not immunosuppressive is false.
sent1: if the Comanche is not a Ceratodontidae it is not a kind of a acatalectic and it is not immunosuppressive. sent2: if the Comanche is a kind of a Ceratodontidae the fact that it is not a kind of a acatalectic and it is not immunosuppressive is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Ceratodontidae then the fact that it is not a acatalectic and is not immunosuppressive is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it does not mint pearlwort that it does not fumble H-bomb and it does not fumble noblesse is not right. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Ceratodontidae then that it is acatalectic and is not immunosuppressive is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a Ceratodontidae it is not a acatalectic and it is not immunosuppressive. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Ceratodontidae then the fact that it is not a acatalectic and it is immunosuppressive does not hold. sent8: if the Comanche is not a Ceratodontidae then that it is a kind of a acatalectic and is not immunosuppressive is not correct. sent9: if the Comanche is not a Ceratodontidae then the fact that it is not a acatalectic and it is immunosuppressive is not true. sent10: that the Comanche is a kind of non-acatalectic thing that is not immunosuppressive is not correct if it is not a Ceratodontidae.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a Ceratodontidae the fact that it is not acatalectic and it is not immunosuppressive is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Comanche is not a Ceratodontidae it is not a kind of a acatalectic and it is not immunosuppressive. sent2: if the Comanche is a kind of a Ceratodontidae the fact that it is not a kind of a acatalectic and it is not immunosuppressive is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Ceratodontidae then the fact that it is not a acatalectic and is not immunosuppressive is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it does not mint pearlwort that it does not fumble H-bomb and it does not fumble noblesse is not right. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Ceratodontidae then that it is acatalectic and is not immunosuppressive is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a Ceratodontidae it is not a acatalectic and it is not immunosuppressive. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Ceratodontidae then the fact that it is not a acatalectic and it is immunosuppressive does not hold. sent8: if the Comanche is not a Ceratodontidae then that it is a kind of a acatalectic and is not immunosuppressive is not correct. sent9: if the Comanche is not a Ceratodontidae then the fact that it is not a acatalectic and it is immunosuppressive is not true. sent10: that the Comanche is a kind of non-acatalectic thing that is not immunosuppressive is not correct if it is not a Ceratodontidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__