the saver is a derringer.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not torment saturation and is a neurotransmitter is wrong. sent2: the fact that the watering is not vibrionic if there is something such that the fact that it does not torment saturation and is a neurotransmitter is incorrect is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the saver is not a kind of a Crane and troops herbalist is false if the sceneshifter does contort. sent4: that that the watering is a kind of a Crane but it does not troop herbalist is incorrect is not wrong if it is not vibrionic. sent5: that that the saver does troop herbalist and does contort does not hold is not wrong if the sceneshifter is a derringer. sent6: the fact that the fact that the fact that the saver is not unsalable and it is a derringer is not wrong does not hold is not false. sent7: the sceneshifter is salable. sent8: if the fact that something is not a Crane and troops herbalist is not right then it is a derringer. sent9: if the saver is a Crane then it is a kind of a derringer. sent10: the sceneshifter is a derringer. sent11: something troops herbalist if it is salable.
sent8 -> int1: if that the saver is not a Crane but it troops herbalist is not right it is a derringer.;
the saver is not a derringer.
sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the watering is not vibrionic.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the watering is a Crane but it does not troop herbalist does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Crane that does not troop herbalist is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the saver is a derringer. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not torment saturation and is a neurotransmitter is wrong. sent2: the fact that the watering is not vibrionic if there is something such that the fact that it does not torment saturation and is a neurotransmitter is incorrect is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the saver is not a kind of a Crane and troops herbalist is false if the sceneshifter does contort. sent4: that that the watering is a kind of a Crane but it does not troop herbalist is incorrect is not wrong if it is not vibrionic. sent5: that that the saver does troop herbalist and does contort does not hold is not wrong if the sceneshifter is a derringer. sent6: the fact that the fact that the fact that the saver is not unsalable and it is a derringer is not wrong does not hold is not false. sent7: the sceneshifter is salable. sent8: if the fact that something is not a Crane and troops herbalist is not right then it is a derringer. sent9: if the saver is a Crane then it is a kind of a derringer. sent10: the sceneshifter is a derringer. sent11: something troops herbalist if it is salable. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if that the saver is not a Crane but it troops herbalist is not right it is a derringer.; __UNKNOWN__