that there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-katabatic thing that teases exponentiation does not hold does not hold.
sent1: something is not katabatic but it teases exponentiation. sent2: that the buzzer is katabatic and does tease exponentiation is false. sent3: there exists something such that that it is katabatic and it does tease exponentiation is false. sent4: the abortus is two-dimensional. sent5: the buzzer is a kind of a thalidomide. sent6: the fact that if the buzzer is not a kind of the quantum the fact that the buzzer is a kind of katabatic thing that teases exponentiation does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the buzzer is not noneffervescent. sent8: there exists something such that that it is not katabatic but a neck is incorrect. sent9: the twinflower is not noneffervescent if the abortus is two-dimensional. sent10: the fact that the buzzer is not katabatic but it teases exponentiation is wrong if it is not a kind of a quantum. sent11: if something does maintain and teases vociferator then it is not a quantum. sent12: if the twinflower is not noneffervescent then the buzzer teases vociferator. sent13: the abortus does tease exponentiation if the buzzer is not two-dimensional. sent14: if something is a kind of a quantum and does tease exponentiation then it is not two-dimensional. sent15: if the trammel is a neck and does not maintain the buzzer does maintain. sent16: the wrapping is both not noneffervescent and not Mosaic. sent17: the trammel is not a neck and does not maintain. sent18: the buzzer does maintain if the trammel is not a neck but it maintain. sent19: if the trammel is not a kind of a neck and does not maintain the buzzer maintain.
sent9 & sent4 -> int1: the twinflower is not noneffervescent.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the buzzer teases vociferator.; sent19 & sent17 -> int3: the buzzer does maintain.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the buzzer maintains and it teases vociferator.; sent11 -> int5: the buzzer is not a quantum if it maintains and it teases vociferator.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the buzzer is not a quantum.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the buzzer is not katabatic but it does tease exponentiation is incorrect hold.; int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-katabatic thing that teases exponentiation does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not katabatic but it teases exponentiation. sent2: that the buzzer is katabatic and does tease exponentiation is false. sent3: there exists something such that that it is katabatic and it does tease exponentiation is false. sent4: the abortus is two-dimensional. sent5: the buzzer is a kind of a thalidomide. sent6: the fact that if the buzzer is not a kind of the quantum the fact that the buzzer is a kind of katabatic thing that teases exponentiation does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the buzzer is not noneffervescent. sent8: there exists something such that that it is not katabatic but a neck is incorrect. sent9: the twinflower is not noneffervescent if the abortus is two-dimensional. sent10: the fact that the buzzer is not katabatic but it teases exponentiation is wrong if it is not a kind of a quantum. sent11: if something does maintain and teases vociferator then it is not a quantum. sent12: if the twinflower is not noneffervescent then the buzzer teases vociferator. sent13: the abortus does tease exponentiation if the buzzer is not two-dimensional. sent14: if something is a kind of a quantum and does tease exponentiation then it is not two-dimensional. sent15: if the trammel is a neck and does not maintain the buzzer does maintain. sent16: the wrapping is both not noneffervescent and not Mosaic. sent17: the trammel is not a neck and does not maintain. sent18: the buzzer does maintain if the trammel is not a neck but it maintain. sent19: if the trammel is not a kind of a neck and does not maintain the buzzer maintain. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent4 -> int1: the twinflower is not noneffervescent.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the buzzer teases vociferator.; sent19 & sent17 -> int3: the buzzer does maintain.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the buzzer maintains and it teases vociferator.; sent11 -> int5: the buzzer is not a quantum if it maintains and it teases vociferator.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the buzzer is not a quantum.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the buzzer is not katabatic but it does tease exponentiation is incorrect hold.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__