the fact that the housetop is a kind of a prang that is a Marrano does not hold.
sent1: if the davit does verse that the paleographer is not a kind of a there is not incorrect. sent2: if something is animalistic then that the stemma mails and it denies plutonium is incorrect. sent3: if that something is a there that does subtilize lumber does not hold then it is not a rawness. sent4: the silverwork is animalistic if there is something such that it denies Spartan and/or is animalistic. sent5: the opepe does not garner Durio if that the colchicine is not a rawness is right. sent6: if the paleographer is not a there then that the colchicine is a there and it subtilizes lumber is not correct. sent7: if the clinid is animalistic then the silverwork does deny Spartan. sent8: if the silverwork does deny Spartan the davit verses. sent9: everything is animalistic. sent10: if the opepe does not garner Durio then the fact that the housetop is a prang and a Marrano is not right.
sent9 -> int1: the clinid is animalistic.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the silverwork denies Spartan.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the davit does verse hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the paleographer is not a kind of a there.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the colchicine is a there and it subtilizes lumber is false.; sent3 -> int6: the colchicine is not a rawness if the fact that it is a there and it does subtilize lumber does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the colchicine is not a rawness.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the opepe does not garner Durio.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the stemma mails and it does deny plutonium is not true is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the housetop is a kind of a prang that is a Marrano does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the davit does verse that the paleographer is not a kind of a there is not incorrect. sent2: if something is animalistic then that the stemma mails and it denies plutonium is incorrect. sent3: if that something is a there that does subtilize lumber does not hold then it is not a rawness. sent4: the silverwork is animalistic if there is something such that it denies Spartan and/or is animalistic. sent5: the opepe does not garner Durio if that the colchicine is not a rawness is right. sent6: if the paleographer is not a there then that the colchicine is a there and it subtilizes lumber is not correct. sent7: if the clinid is animalistic then the silverwork does deny Spartan. sent8: if the silverwork does deny Spartan the davit verses. sent9: everything is animalistic. sent10: if the opepe does not garner Durio then the fact that the housetop is a prang and a Marrano is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the clinid is animalistic.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the silverwork denies Spartan.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the davit does verse hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the paleographer is not a kind of a there.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the colchicine is a there and it subtilizes lumber is false.; sent3 -> int6: the colchicine is not a rawness if the fact that it is a there and it does subtilize lumber does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the colchicine is not a rawness.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the opepe does not garner Durio.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__