that the kisser does decorate and does not interpose is not correct if the dough does hire.
sent1: the fact that the kisser does decorate and it interposes is incorrect. sent2: the kisser does not interpose. sent3: that the fact that the kisser does decorate and it does interpose is true does not hold if the dough is a hire. sent4: if something is not a kind of a oscine it is a hire. sent5: if the dough is not a oscine it is a hire. sent6: if the kisser does decorate and does not interpose then the dough is not oscine. sent7: if something is not a oscine it is not a hire. sent8: if the fact that the kisser decorates and interposes is right then the dough is non-oscine. sent9: if the dough is a hire the kisser decorates but it does not interpose. sent10: the fact that the dough is non-oscine thing that is tearful is not right if the bittersweet is not a kind of a hire.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kisser does decorate and does not interpose.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the dough is non-oscine.; sent7 -> int2: the dough does not hire if it is not a oscine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dough does not hire is not wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dough does hire.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the kisser decorates and does not interpose does not hold.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the saxhorn is rh-negative and is not a kind of a oscine is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = that the kisser does decorate and does not interpose is not correct if the dough does hire. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the kisser does decorate and it interposes is incorrect. sent2: the kisser does not interpose. sent3: that the fact that the kisser does decorate and it does interpose is true does not hold if the dough is a hire. sent4: if something is not a kind of a oscine it is a hire. sent5: if the dough is not a oscine it is a hire. sent6: if the kisser does decorate and does not interpose then the dough is not oscine. sent7: if something is not a oscine it is not a hire. sent8: if the fact that the kisser decorates and interposes is right then the dough is non-oscine. sent9: if the dough is a hire the kisser decorates but it does not interpose. sent10: the fact that the dough is non-oscine thing that is tearful is not right if the bittersweet is not a kind of a hire. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kisser does decorate and does not interpose.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the dough is non-oscine.; sent7 -> int2: the dough does not hire if it is not a oscine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dough does not hire is not wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dough does hire.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the kisser decorates and does not interpose does not hold.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__