the man is not a kind of a Scorpius.
sent1: The Zimbalist does style foreplay. sent2: the neckband does not style Zimbalist but it is a kind of an epsilon if it is a combretum. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an epsilon. sent4: the man is intraventricular. sent5: the foreplay does style Zimbalist. sent6: the fact that the neckband is not tonal and it is not an astrakhan is false if the fact that the brunet is aerial is correct. sent7: the neckband styles Zimbalist if the foreplay does not synthesize grant. sent8: if the bravo does not style Bangladesh then the nutriment is a twinkler and/or it is nutritional. sent9: if the nutriment is a twinkler then the brunet is an aerial. sent10: if the foreplay is not a combretum then the brunet does not mellow foreplay and/or it is not tonal. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not tonal and is not an astrakhan is incorrect the foreplay mellows foreplay. sent12: if the bravo spangs remark but it is not a practitioner it does not style Bangladesh. sent13: something is a Aberdeen if it does style Zimbalist. sent14: the brunet is a kind of an aerial if the fact that the nutriment is nutritional is not wrong. sent15: the neckband is not a kind of a train. sent16: that the neckband is a loft but it does not synthesize grant is wrong. sent17: if the foreplay is an epsilon the neckband lofts. sent18: that the foreplay does style Zimbalist or is not a Scorpius or both is not false if the neckband is not an epsilon. sent19: something mellows foreplay and it does style Zimbalist if it is not tonal. sent20: the bravo spangs remark but it is not a practitioner. sent21: the foreplay is not a combretum if it is not an epsilon and styles Zimbalist. sent22: the man is a Scorpius if that the brunet is not tonal hold. sent23: the neckband lofts. sent24: if the brunet does not mellow foreplay then the man is a Scorpius. sent25: if there is something such that it is not an epsilon the brunet is not a combretum. sent26: if the foreplay is a kind of an epsilon the neckband lofts but it does not synthesize grant. sent27: if the foreplay does not loft then the neckband does style Zimbalist.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the foreplay is an epsilon.; sent26 & assump1 -> int1: the neckband lofts but it does not synthesize grant.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the foreplay is not an epsilon.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the foreplay is not an epsilon and styles Zimbalist.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the foreplay is not a kind of a combretum.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the brunet does not mellow foreplay or it is not tonal or both.; int6 & sent24 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the man is not a Scorpius.
$hypothesis$ = the man is not a kind of a Scorpius. ; $context$ = sent1: The Zimbalist does style foreplay. sent2: the neckband does not style Zimbalist but it is a kind of an epsilon if it is a combretum. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an epsilon. sent4: the man is intraventricular. sent5: the foreplay does style Zimbalist. sent6: the fact that the neckband is not tonal and it is not an astrakhan is false if the fact that the brunet is aerial is correct. sent7: the neckband styles Zimbalist if the foreplay does not synthesize grant. sent8: if the bravo does not style Bangladesh then the nutriment is a twinkler and/or it is nutritional. sent9: if the nutriment is a twinkler then the brunet is an aerial. sent10: if the foreplay is not a combretum then the brunet does not mellow foreplay and/or it is not tonal. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not tonal and is not an astrakhan is incorrect the foreplay mellows foreplay. sent12: if the bravo spangs remark but it is not a practitioner it does not style Bangladesh. sent13: something is a Aberdeen if it does style Zimbalist. sent14: the brunet is a kind of an aerial if the fact that the nutriment is nutritional is not wrong. sent15: the neckband is not a kind of a train. sent16: that the neckband is a loft but it does not synthesize grant is wrong. sent17: if the foreplay is an epsilon the neckband lofts. sent18: that the foreplay does style Zimbalist or is not a Scorpius or both is not false if the neckband is not an epsilon. sent19: something mellows foreplay and it does style Zimbalist if it is not tonal. sent20: the bravo spangs remark but it is not a practitioner. sent21: the foreplay is not a combretum if it is not an epsilon and styles Zimbalist. sent22: the man is a Scorpius if that the brunet is not tonal hold. sent23: the neckband lofts. sent24: if the brunet does not mellow foreplay then the man is a Scorpius. sent25: if there is something such that it is not an epsilon the brunet is not a combretum. sent26: if the foreplay is a kind of an epsilon the neckband lofts but it does not synthesize grant. sent27: if the foreplay does not loft then the neckband does style Zimbalist. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the foreplay is an epsilon.; sent26 & assump1 -> int1: the neckband lofts but it does not synthesize grant.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the foreplay is not an epsilon.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the foreplay is not an epsilon and styles Zimbalist.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the foreplay is not a kind of a combretum.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the brunet does not mellow foreplay or it is not tonal or both.; int6 & sent24 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__