there exists something such that if the fact that that it is not uniovular and it is not a patrilineage hold is not right it does invite sayeret.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-tentacular thing that is not a Shrovetide is not true the fact that it ebbs Veneto hold. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a swallow and not a amphidiploidy does not hold it is credible. sent3: if the Laver is both not uniovular and not a patrilineage it invites sayeret. sent4: if that the dockside is not a NIMBY and is not a kind of a sard is false it is uniovular. sent5: there exists something such that if it is clayey then it invites Hyalophora. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is both not ducal and not a jeweler is not right it is a requital. sent7: there is something such that if that it is not a festival and not an apartment does not hold then it is a stirk. sent8: the Laver is a gunwale if that it does not steepen overlook and is not ducal is not correct. sent9: if that that something is uniovular but it is not a patrilineage is right is false it does invite sayeret. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Manzoni then it is a NIMBY. sent11: if the fact that something is a patrilineage is correct it invites sayeret. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Nicaraguan it is a disembarrassment. sent13: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a bond and is not a glutamate is wrong then it is a Niamey. sent14: if the fact that the Laver is uniovular but it is not a patrilineage does not hold then it does invite sayeret. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is uniovular and it is not a patrilineage is not true it invites sayeret. sent16: the Laver is a whitewash if that it is not uniovular and is not tentacular does not hold. sent17: if something is non-uniovular thing that is not a patrilineage then that it does invite sayeret is true. sent18: there exists something such that if it is non-uniovular and not a patrilineage then it does invite sayeret. sent19: if the fact that the Laver is a patrilineage is correct the fact that it invites sayeret is true.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that that it is not uniovular and it is not a patrilineage hold is not right it does invite sayeret. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-tentacular thing that is not a Shrovetide is not true the fact that it ebbs Veneto hold. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a swallow and not a amphidiploidy does not hold it is credible. sent3: if the Laver is both not uniovular and not a patrilineage it invites sayeret. sent4: if that the dockside is not a NIMBY and is not a kind of a sard is false it is uniovular. sent5: there exists something such that if it is clayey then it invites Hyalophora. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is both not ducal and not a jeweler is not right it is a requital. sent7: there is something such that if that it is not a festival and not an apartment does not hold then it is a stirk. sent8: the Laver is a gunwale if that it does not steepen overlook and is not ducal is not correct. sent9: if that that something is uniovular but it is not a patrilineage is right is false it does invite sayeret. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Manzoni then it is a NIMBY. sent11: if the fact that something is a patrilineage is correct it invites sayeret. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Nicaraguan it is a disembarrassment. sent13: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a bond and is not a glutamate is wrong then it is a Niamey. sent14: if the fact that the Laver is uniovular but it is not a patrilineage does not hold then it does invite sayeret. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is uniovular and it is not a patrilineage is not true it invites sayeret. sent16: the Laver is a whitewash if that it is not uniovular and is not tentacular does not hold. sent17: if something is non-uniovular thing that is not a patrilineage then that it does invite sayeret is true. sent18: there exists something such that if it is non-uniovular and not a patrilineage then it does invite sayeret. sent19: if the fact that the Laver is a patrilineage is correct the fact that it invites sayeret is true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__