the potpie is a stein and it does romanticize.
sent1: that the potpie is a stein if the specifier is not a stein is true. sent2: if that the ginseng is not a deforestation and does not gild ranula is not right the signer is a Howe. sent3: the signer is an irrational. sent4: the signer is a roux. sent5: that the ginseng is not a deforestation if there exists something such that it does stab graft is not wrong. sent6: the specifier does not romanticize. sent7: the signer is a kind of a Howe. sent8: if that the potpie is not a stein is correct the ginseng is a stein that is a deforestation. sent9: the potpie is a kind of a stein that does romanticize if the specifier is not a stein. sent10: the fact that the specifier is not a stein hold if something either is a deforestation or is not non-atomistic or both. sent11: the Nestorian does gild ranula and is anencephalic. sent12: the ginseng is a kind of a deforestation if that the signer gilds ranula is not wrong. sent13: the signer romanticizes and is a kind of a Howe. sent14: the ginseng does not gild ranula. sent15: the signer is a Howe and it gilds ranula.
sent15 -> int1: the signer gilds ranula.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the ginseng is a deforestation.; int2 -> int3: either the ginseng is a kind of a deforestation or it is atomistic or both.; int3 -> int4: either something is a deforestation or it is atomistic or both.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the specifier is not a stein.; sent9 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the potpie is a stein and does romanticize is false.
$hypothesis$ = the potpie is a stein and it does romanticize. ; $context$ = sent1: that the potpie is a stein if the specifier is not a stein is true. sent2: if that the ginseng is not a deforestation and does not gild ranula is not right the signer is a Howe. sent3: the signer is an irrational. sent4: the signer is a roux. sent5: that the ginseng is not a deforestation if there exists something such that it does stab graft is not wrong. sent6: the specifier does not romanticize. sent7: the signer is a kind of a Howe. sent8: if that the potpie is not a stein is correct the ginseng is a stein that is a deforestation. sent9: the potpie is a kind of a stein that does romanticize if the specifier is not a stein. sent10: the fact that the specifier is not a stein hold if something either is a deforestation or is not non-atomistic or both. sent11: the Nestorian does gild ranula and is anencephalic. sent12: the ginseng is a kind of a deforestation if that the signer gilds ranula is not wrong. sent13: the signer romanticizes and is a kind of a Howe. sent14: the ginseng does not gild ranula. sent15: the signer is a Howe and it gilds ranula. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the signer gilds ranula.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the ginseng is a deforestation.; int2 -> int3: either the ginseng is a kind of a deforestation or it is atomistic or both.; int3 -> int4: either something is a deforestation or it is atomistic or both.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the specifier is not a stein.; sent9 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__