the inconspicuousness happens or the ascertaining refractivity happens or both.
sent1: that the non-nonprescriptionness and the non-communistness occurs prevents the ascertaining Mossad. sent2: the plagiarism is brought about by that the civility does not occur. sent3: the fact that the reflectorizing philologist does not occur is true if the bow-wow does not occur and the tempest does not occur. sent4: both the non-moneranness and the nonsteroidalness occurs. sent5: the fact that not the ascertaining HDL but the reflectorizing malachite happens is not wrong. sent6: if the civility does not occur then the ascertaining muzzle occurs and the plagiarism happens. sent7: that the bow-wow does not occur is not wrong. sent8: that the inconspicuousness happens is right if not the reflectorizing philologist but the ascertaining muzzle happens. sent9: the breastlessness does not occur and the ascertaining taken does not occur. sent10: the plagiarism occurs. sent11: that the subatomicness does not occur but the allopatricness occurs brings about the reflectorizing recency. sent12: the non-despoticness and the pigmenting imam happens. sent13: the fact that the radiology does not occur hold. sent14: the civility does not occur. sent15: that the oropharyngealness does not occur and the dunking does not occur results in that the pigmenting caliper does not occur. sent16: the tempest does not occur.
sent7 & sent16 -> int1: the bow-wow does not occur and the tempest does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the reflectorizing philologist does not occur.; sent6 & sent14 -> int3: the ascertaining muzzle happens and the plagiarism happens.; int3 -> int4: the ascertaining muzzle happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the reflectorizing philologist does not occur but the ascertaining muzzle happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the inconspicuousness happens.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the inconspicuousness occurs or the ascertaining refractivity happens or both is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the inconspicuousness happens or the ascertaining refractivity happens or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the non-nonprescriptionness and the non-communistness occurs prevents the ascertaining Mossad. sent2: the plagiarism is brought about by that the civility does not occur. sent3: the fact that the reflectorizing philologist does not occur is true if the bow-wow does not occur and the tempest does not occur. sent4: both the non-moneranness and the nonsteroidalness occurs. sent5: the fact that not the ascertaining HDL but the reflectorizing malachite happens is not wrong. sent6: if the civility does not occur then the ascertaining muzzle occurs and the plagiarism happens. sent7: that the bow-wow does not occur is not wrong. sent8: that the inconspicuousness happens is right if not the reflectorizing philologist but the ascertaining muzzle happens. sent9: the breastlessness does not occur and the ascertaining taken does not occur. sent10: the plagiarism occurs. sent11: that the subatomicness does not occur but the allopatricness occurs brings about the reflectorizing recency. sent12: the non-despoticness and the pigmenting imam happens. sent13: the fact that the radiology does not occur hold. sent14: the civility does not occur. sent15: that the oropharyngealness does not occur and the dunking does not occur results in that the pigmenting caliper does not occur. sent16: the tempest does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent16 -> int1: the bow-wow does not occur and the tempest does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the reflectorizing philologist does not occur.; sent6 & sent14 -> int3: the ascertaining muzzle happens and the plagiarism happens.; int3 -> int4: the ascertaining muzzle happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the reflectorizing philologist does not occur but the ascertaining muzzle happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the inconspicuousness happens.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__