the attacker is not a Hull but it is an affirmative.
sent1: the motel is not a syllogism if something is both not a pool and epicyclic. sent2: the fact that the advisee is a brunet is not false. sent3: if something does front attacker then it is flinty. sent4: the attacker is not a kind of a Hull if there exists something such that it is a kind of fluvial thing that is a invigilation. sent5: if there is something such that it is not fluvial then that the attacker is not a kind of a invigilation is not wrong. sent6: the motel is a kind of a knacker. sent7: something is not fluvial if it is not non-flinty and it is not a kind of a shit. sent8: if the fact that that the motel is a kind of a shit but it is not a reclassification is correct is wrong then the Friesian is not a shit. sent9: everything is an assemblywoman. sent10: the Friesian is epicyclic if it pegs photometrist. sent11: the Friesian is both not a pool and epicyclic if it does peg photometrist. sent12: there is something such that it does pool and it is epicyclic. sent13: The photometrist pegs Friesian. sent14: if something does not peg photometrist then that it is not a Hull and it is affirmative is not right. sent15: something that is not a invigilation is a knacker and is not a syllogism. sent16: the attacker pools. sent17: there exists something such that it is epicyclic. sent18: if the motel is both not a syllogism and a knacker then the advisee is a invigilation. sent19: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a pool. sent20: there is something such that it is a kind of a invigilation. sent21: if the advisee is a kind of a infelicity but it is not a Pomoxis the Friesian is not a Pomoxis. sent22: if the advisee is a brunet then it is a kind of a infelicity and it is not a Pomoxis. sent23: something is fluvial. sent24: that that something is a kind of a shit but it is not a reclassification is not wrong is false if it is an assemblywoman. sent25: the advisee is fluvial. sent26: the attacker is an affirmative. sent27: something fronts attacker and it is basal if it is not a Pomoxis. sent28: the Friesian is epicyclic.
that the attacker is not a Hull but it is an affirmative does not hold.
sent14 -> int1: that the attacker is not a Hull but it is an affirmative is not correct if that it does not peg photometrist is right.; sent7 -> int2: the Friesian is not fluvial if it is both flinty and not a shit.; sent27 -> int3: if the Friesian is not a Pomoxis it fronts attacker and is basal.; sent2 & sent22 -> int4: the advisee is a kind of a infelicity and is not a kind of a Pomoxis.; sent21 & int4 -> int5: the Friesian is not a Pomoxis.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the Friesian does front attacker and is basal.; int6 -> int7: the Friesian does front attacker.; sent3 -> int8: if the Friesian fronts attacker then it is flinty.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Friesian is flinty.; sent24 -> int10: if the blowing is an assemblywoman then the fact that it is a kind of a shit and it is not a reclassification is incorrect.; sent9 -> int11: the blowing is an assemblywoman.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the blowing is both a shit and not a reclassification is false.; int12 -> int13: there is nothing that is a shit and not a reclassification.; int13 -> int14: the fact that the motel is a kind of a shit that is not a kind of a reclassification does not hold.; int14 & sent8 -> int15: the Friesian is not a shit.; int9 & int15 -> int16: the Friesian is flinty and is not a shit.; int2 & int16 -> int17: the Friesian is not fluvial.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is not fluvial.; sent5 & int18 -> int19: the attacker is not a invigilation.; sent15 -> int20: if the attacker is not a kind of a invigilation it is a knacker and is not a syllogism.; int19 & int20 -> int21: that the attacker is a kind of a knacker that is not a syllogism hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the attacker is not a Hull but it is an affirmative. ; $context$ = sent1: the motel is not a syllogism if something is both not a pool and epicyclic. sent2: the fact that the advisee is a brunet is not false. sent3: if something does front attacker then it is flinty. sent4: the attacker is not a kind of a Hull if there exists something such that it is a kind of fluvial thing that is a invigilation. sent5: if there is something such that it is not fluvial then that the attacker is not a kind of a invigilation is not wrong. sent6: the motel is a kind of a knacker. sent7: something is not fluvial if it is not non-flinty and it is not a kind of a shit. sent8: if the fact that that the motel is a kind of a shit but it is not a reclassification is correct is wrong then the Friesian is not a shit. sent9: everything is an assemblywoman. sent10: the Friesian is epicyclic if it pegs photometrist. sent11: the Friesian is both not a pool and epicyclic if it does peg photometrist. sent12: there is something such that it does pool and it is epicyclic. sent13: The photometrist pegs Friesian. sent14: if something does not peg photometrist then that it is not a Hull and it is affirmative is not right. sent15: something that is not a invigilation is a knacker and is not a syllogism. sent16: the attacker pools. sent17: there exists something such that it is epicyclic. sent18: if the motel is both not a syllogism and a knacker then the advisee is a invigilation. sent19: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a pool. sent20: there is something such that it is a kind of a invigilation. sent21: if the advisee is a kind of a infelicity but it is not a Pomoxis the Friesian is not a Pomoxis. sent22: if the advisee is a brunet then it is a kind of a infelicity and it is not a Pomoxis. sent23: something is fluvial. sent24: that that something is a kind of a shit but it is not a reclassification is not wrong is false if it is an assemblywoman. sent25: the advisee is fluvial. sent26: the attacker is an affirmative. sent27: something fronts attacker and it is basal if it is not a Pomoxis. sent28: the Friesian is epicyclic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__