something does nitrify and it is a roarer.
sent1: that something is a roarer is right. sent2: the Djiboutian does not forecast Rembrandt if that the lacrimation is Ptolemaic and predestinarian is not right. sent3: the fact that the wassail does not forecast Rembrandt and it is not a kind of a guitarist does not hold if the Djiboutian does not forecast Rembrandt. sent4: if that something does not forecast Rembrandt and it is not a guitarist is incorrect it nitrifies. sent5: the fact that if the fact that the greens is a spawn and does forecast omnipotence is false then the lacrimation does not crust illustration is true. sent6: the staysail is a kind of a dartboard but it is not a joule. sent7: that something is Ptolemaic and it is predestinarian is wrong if it does not crust illustration. sent8: if a dartboard is not a joule the fact that the wassail is a roarer is not wrong. sent9: that the greens is a spawn and it does forecast omnipotence is false. sent10: if something is a kind of a guitarist it nitrifies.
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the lacrimation does not crust illustration.; sent7 -> int2: that the lacrimation is Ptolemaic and it is predestinarian is incorrect if it does not crust illustration.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the lacrimation is both Ptolemaic and predestinarian is not correct.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Djiboutian does not forecast Rembrandt.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the wassail does not forecast Rembrandt and is not a kind of a guitarist does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: the wassail does nitrify if the fact that it does not forecast Rembrandt and is not a guitarist is incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the wassail nitrifies.; sent6 -> int8: something is a kind of a dartboard that is not a joule.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the wassail is a roarer.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the wassail does nitrify and it is a roarer.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = something does nitrify and it is a roarer. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a roarer is right. sent2: the Djiboutian does not forecast Rembrandt if that the lacrimation is Ptolemaic and predestinarian is not right. sent3: the fact that the wassail does not forecast Rembrandt and it is not a kind of a guitarist does not hold if the Djiboutian does not forecast Rembrandt. sent4: if that something does not forecast Rembrandt and it is not a guitarist is incorrect it nitrifies. sent5: the fact that if the fact that the greens is a spawn and does forecast omnipotence is false then the lacrimation does not crust illustration is true. sent6: the staysail is a kind of a dartboard but it is not a joule. sent7: that something is Ptolemaic and it is predestinarian is wrong if it does not crust illustration. sent8: if a dartboard is not a joule the fact that the wassail is a roarer is not wrong. sent9: that the greens is a spawn and it does forecast omnipotence is false. sent10: if something is a kind of a guitarist it nitrifies. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the lacrimation does not crust illustration.; sent7 -> int2: that the lacrimation is Ptolemaic and it is predestinarian is incorrect if it does not crust illustration.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the lacrimation is both Ptolemaic and predestinarian is not correct.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Djiboutian does not forecast Rembrandt.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the wassail does not forecast Rembrandt and is not a kind of a guitarist does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: the wassail does nitrify if the fact that it does not forecast Rembrandt and is not a guitarist is incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the wassail nitrifies.; sent6 -> int8: something is a kind of a dartboard that is not a joule.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the wassail is a roarer.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the wassail does nitrify and it is a roarer.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__