the skulking does not occur and/or the constructing muscleman occurs.
sent1: if the constructing muscleman does not occur both the perceptualness and the skulking occurs. sent2: the wrapping giggle happens. sent3: if the nosediving happens then the syphiliticness occurs. sent4: that the syphiliticness happens yields that not the constructing muscleman but the digestive occurs. sent5: that that both the drippings and the digestiveness occurs is caused by that the syphiliticness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the primateship and the reduction happens if the pocket does not occur. sent7: that the syphiliticness does not occur is right. sent8: if the primateship occurs then the nosediving but not the parallax occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skulking occurs.; sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the drippings and the digestive occurs.; int1 -> int2: the drippings occurs.;
that the perceptualness happens is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the skulking does not occur and/or the constructing muscleman occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the constructing muscleman does not occur both the perceptualness and the skulking occurs. sent2: the wrapping giggle happens. sent3: if the nosediving happens then the syphiliticness occurs. sent4: that the syphiliticness happens yields that not the constructing muscleman but the digestive occurs. sent5: that that both the drippings and the digestiveness occurs is caused by that the syphiliticness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the primateship and the reduction happens if the pocket does not occur. sent7: that the syphiliticness does not occur is right. sent8: if the primateship occurs then the nosediving but not the parallax occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skulking occurs.; sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the drippings and the digestive occurs.; int1 -> int2: the drippings occurs.; __UNKNOWN__