the fact that the electiveness does not occur if the fact that the scholarliness happens hold is not right.
sent1: if the upholding Troglodytidae does not occur the demonstrative but not the testing occurs. sent2: if the nonpasserineness does not occur the upholding hot-rod but not the vitality occurs. sent3: the criticizing taxonomy does not occur if the criticizing napu happens and the indispensableness occurs. sent4: the intentionalness does not occur and the potentness occurs if the sneezing does not occur. sent5: the criticizing overspill happens. sent6: that the finalizing array does not occur triggers either the moralism or that the craning freeman happens or both. sent7: both the photometry and the beaklessness occurs if the vitality does not occur. sent8: the sneezing does not occur. sent9: the fact that that the criticizing overspill occurs and the elective happens prevents the scholarliness is correct. sent10: the actableness happens and the grooving happens. sent11: the scholarliness happens if the criticizing overspill occurs and the electiveness happens. sent12: that not the elective but the choreographicness occurs is incorrect if the criticizing overspill does not occur. sent13: that the spicateness occurs prevents the upholding Zygocactus. sent14: if the demonstrative happens the finalizing array does not occur. sent15: if that both the non-electiveness and the choreographicness happens is not correct then the choreographicness does not occur. sent16: the jeremiad does not occur and/or the scholarliness does not occur if the photometry occurs. sent17: the flip-flop occurs. sent18: that the upholding Troglodytidae happens is prevented by the non-intentionalness. sent19: if the scholarliness occurs then the electiveness occurs. sent20: the IV happens. sent21: the upholding woodcock does not occur. sent22: that the choreographicness occurs is false if the unadaptableness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scholarliness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the elective occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: both the criticizing overspill and the elective occurs.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the scholarliness does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the elective does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the choreographicness does not occur.
sent4 & sent8 -> int5: the non-intentionalness and the potentness happens.; int5 -> int6: the intentionalness does not occur.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the upholding Troglodytidae does not occur.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the demonstrativeness occurs and the testing does not occur.; int8 -> int9: that the demonstrativeness happens is not false.; sent14 & int9 -> int10: the finalizing array does not occur.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the moralism occurs and/or the craning freeman occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the electiveness does not occur if the fact that the scholarliness happens hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the upholding Troglodytidae does not occur the demonstrative but not the testing occurs. sent2: if the nonpasserineness does not occur the upholding hot-rod but not the vitality occurs. sent3: the criticizing taxonomy does not occur if the criticizing napu happens and the indispensableness occurs. sent4: the intentionalness does not occur and the potentness occurs if the sneezing does not occur. sent5: the criticizing overspill happens. sent6: that the finalizing array does not occur triggers either the moralism or that the craning freeman happens or both. sent7: both the photometry and the beaklessness occurs if the vitality does not occur. sent8: the sneezing does not occur. sent9: the fact that that the criticizing overspill occurs and the elective happens prevents the scholarliness is correct. sent10: the actableness happens and the grooving happens. sent11: the scholarliness happens if the criticizing overspill occurs and the electiveness happens. sent12: that not the elective but the choreographicness occurs is incorrect if the criticizing overspill does not occur. sent13: that the spicateness occurs prevents the upholding Zygocactus. sent14: if the demonstrative happens the finalizing array does not occur. sent15: if that both the non-electiveness and the choreographicness happens is not correct then the choreographicness does not occur. sent16: the jeremiad does not occur and/or the scholarliness does not occur if the photometry occurs. sent17: the flip-flop occurs. sent18: that the upholding Troglodytidae happens is prevented by the non-intentionalness. sent19: if the scholarliness occurs then the electiveness occurs. sent20: the IV happens. sent21: the upholding woodcock does not occur. sent22: that the choreographicness occurs is false if the unadaptableness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scholarliness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the elective occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: both the criticizing overspill and the elective occurs.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the scholarliness does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the elective does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__