the instructing vitalism occurs or the disjunction does not occur or both.
sent1: if the Carthaginian occurs then the bioremediation occurs. sent2: both the Carthaginian and the lignifying occurs if the instructing Calgary does not occur. sent3: if the instructing Calgary does not occur the fact that the lignifying happens is not incorrect. sent4: the instructing Calgary does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the macerativeness does not occur is right then the hyperemicness occurs and/or the bioremediation does not occur. sent6: that the carboxyl happens and the disjunction happens prevents that the macerativeness occurs. sent7: if the Carthaginian occurs then the fact that the hyperemicness occurs or the bioremediation does not occur or both does not hold. sent8: the lignifying happens. sent9: the carboxylness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disjunction occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the carboxylness and the disjunction occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the macerativeness does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the hyperemicness happens and/or the bioremediation does not occur.; sent2 & sent4 -> int4: the Carthaginian and the lignifying happens.; int4 -> int5: the Carthaginian happens.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: that the fact that the hyperemicness occurs and/or the bioremediation does not occur hold does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the disjunction does not occur.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the instructing vitalism occurs or the disjunction does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Carthaginian occurs then the bioremediation occurs. sent2: both the Carthaginian and the lignifying occurs if the instructing Calgary does not occur. sent3: if the instructing Calgary does not occur the fact that the lignifying happens is not incorrect. sent4: the instructing Calgary does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the macerativeness does not occur is right then the hyperemicness occurs and/or the bioremediation does not occur. sent6: that the carboxyl happens and the disjunction happens prevents that the macerativeness occurs. sent7: if the Carthaginian occurs then the fact that the hyperemicness occurs or the bioremediation does not occur or both does not hold. sent8: the lignifying happens. sent9: the carboxylness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disjunction occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the carboxylness and the disjunction occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the macerativeness does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the hyperemicness happens and/or the bioremediation does not occur.; sent2 & sent4 -> int4: the Carthaginian and the lignifying happens.; int4 -> int5: the Carthaginian happens.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: that the fact that the hyperemicness occurs and/or the bioremediation does not occur hold does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the disjunction does not occur.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__