there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a pragmatism that is not a pieplant is not true.
sent1: if the hock is geological the amorpha is not a headroom but it is sepaloid. sent2: the pisser is not off-site. sent3: that the pisser does remember but it is non-sepaloid is false. sent4: if that something is a headroom is not incorrect it is monotypic. sent5: the sandbag is geological if the hock is geological. sent6: the lapboard is non-off-site and it is not a tone. sent7: the pisser does not remember. sent8: the pisser is not geological. sent9: if the amorpha is not off-site and is sepaloid the sandbag is not geological. sent10: the fact that the amorpha is sepaloid thing that does remember is incorrect. sent11: the hock is geological if the pisser is a kind of non-geological thing that does not remember. sent12: the fact that the perceiver is a pragmatism but it is not a pieplant is incorrect if the tailstock is not a headroom. sent13: if the hock is sepaloid the amorpha is non-geological but it is monotypic.
sent4 -> int1: if the tailstock is a headroom then that it is monotypic hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tailstock is a kind of a headroom.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tailstock is monotypic.; sent8 & sent7 -> int3: the pisser is not geological and it does not remember.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: the hock is geological.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the sandbag is geological.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a pragmatism that is not a pieplant is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hock is geological the amorpha is not a headroom but it is sepaloid. sent2: the pisser is not off-site. sent3: that the pisser does remember but it is non-sepaloid is false. sent4: if that something is a headroom is not incorrect it is monotypic. sent5: the sandbag is geological if the hock is geological. sent6: the lapboard is non-off-site and it is not a tone. sent7: the pisser does not remember. sent8: the pisser is not geological. sent9: if the amorpha is not off-site and is sepaloid the sandbag is not geological. sent10: the fact that the amorpha is sepaloid thing that does remember is incorrect. sent11: the hock is geological if the pisser is a kind of non-geological thing that does not remember. sent12: the fact that the perceiver is a pragmatism but it is not a pieplant is incorrect if the tailstock is not a headroom. sent13: if the hock is sepaloid the amorpha is non-geological but it is monotypic. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the tailstock is a headroom then that it is monotypic hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tailstock is a kind of a headroom.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tailstock is monotypic.; sent8 & sent7 -> int3: the pisser is not geological and it does not remember.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: the hock is geological.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the sandbag is geological.; __UNKNOWN__