that the bug is not a ledge and it is non-xeric does not hold.
sent1: if something is staccato that that the bug is not a ledge but it is xeric is not wrong does not hold. sent2: that the phone is a colloquium and coordinates loupe is incorrect. sent3: that the bug is not a kind of a ledge but it is xeric is false. sent4: the fact that the bug is not a kind of a ledge and is not xeric is not right if there exists something such that it is staccato. sent5: if the phone does consider Wintun then the fact that it is a colloquium and it does coordinate loupe is false. sent6: the fact that the rummer is galactic is true. sent7: the phone is galactic thing that does consider Wintun. sent8: the phone is galactic. sent9: the cashbox is staccato if the rummer is not a separate. sent10: the fact that the phone is not a colloquium and coordinates loupe is false if that it does consider Wintun is not incorrect. sent11: something does not consider Wintun and/or it is galactic if it coordinates loupe. sent12: the rummer is not a separate if the phone is a kind of a colloquium. sent13: that the bug is a ledge but it is not xeric does not hold if something is staccato. sent14: the fact that the bug is a ledge but not xeric is false. sent15: if there is something such that it considers Wintun then the fact that the cashbox is not staccato and it is not a kind of a colloquium is not true. sent16: the rummer is not separate if the fact that the phone is not a colloquium and coordinates loupe does not hold.
sent7 -> int1: the phone considers Wintun.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the phone is not a colloquium but it does coordinate loupe is not correct.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the rummer is not separate.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the cashbox is staccato.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is staccato is not wrong.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
something does serenade selectwoman.
sent11 -> int6: the rummer does not consider Wintun and/or it is galactic if it coordinates loupe.;
$hypothesis$ = that the bug is not a ledge and it is non-xeric does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is staccato that that the bug is not a ledge but it is xeric is not wrong does not hold. sent2: that the phone is a colloquium and coordinates loupe is incorrect. sent3: that the bug is not a kind of a ledge but it is xeric is false. sent4: the fact that the bug is not a kind of a ledge and is not xeric is not right if there exists something such that it is staccato. sent5: if the phone does consider Wintun then the fact that it is a colloquium and it does coordinate loupe is false. sent6: the fact that the rummer is galactic is true. sent7: the phone is galactic thing that does consider Wintun. sent8: the phone is galactic. sent9: the cashbox is staccato if the rummer is not a separate. sent10: the fact that the phone is not a colloquium and coordinates loupe is false if that it does consider Wintun is not incorrect. sent11: something does not consider Wintun and/or it is galactic if it coordinates loupe. sent12: the rummer is not a separate if the phone is a kind of a colloquium. sent13: that the bug is a ledge but it is not xeric does not hold if something is staccato. sent14: the fact that the bug is a ledge but not xeric is false. sent15: if there is something such that it considers Wintun then the fact that the cashbox is not staccato and it is not a kind of a colloquium is not true. sent16: the rummer is not separate if the fact that the phone is not a colloquium and coordinates loupe does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the phone considers Wintun.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the phone is not a colloquium but it does coordinate loupe is not correct.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the rummer is not separate.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the cashbox is staccato.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is staccato is not wrong.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__