the fact that that the adviser is a kind of a furor and/or is a duchy is incorrect is true.
sent1: something is a furor if it is a kind of a Fuego. sent2: the adviser is scarce a crabbed. sent3: that the igniter is the Kissinger if the fact that the igniter is both not doctoral and not dialectal does not hold is not false. sent4: the fact that the archespore is not nonretractile but it is not actinometric does not hold if the radiopharmaceutical is not a lick. sent5: that the radiopharmaceutical licks is not true. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is retractile and is not actinometric is incorrect the igniter is not non-proteolytic. sent7: the fact that the adviser is a kind of a furor or is a duchy or both is not right if the fact that the metamere is not scarce is not wrong. sent8: that the adviser is scarce is not false. sent9: if something is a kind of a crabbed then it is a Fuego. sent10: if something is a blaring the girl is a cornsilk and it is a resourcefulness. sent11: if the igniter is a Kissinger the wallow is a Kissinger. sent12: the wallow is a blaring if it is a Kissinger. sent13: if something is proteolytic the fact that it is non-doctoral thing that is not dialectal is wrong. sent14: that if the seat is not a crabbed that the form is a kind of a Fuego and/or it is scarce is not correct hold. sent15: the metamere is not scarce if the fact that the form is a kind of a Fuego or it is scarce or both is incorrect.
sent2 -> int1: the adviser is a crabbed.; sent9 -> int2: the adviser is a kind of a Fuego if that it is a crabbed hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adviser is a Fuego.; sent1 -> int4: if the adviser is a kind of a Fuego then it is a furor.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the adviser is a kind of a furor.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that the adviser is a furor and/or it is a duchy is not right.
sent13 -> int6: if that the igniter is proteolytic is not incorrect then that it is non-doctoral and it is not dialectal does not hold.; sent4 & sent5 -> int7: the fact that the archespore is both retractile and not actinometric is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is retractile and it is not actinometric is wrong.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the fact that the igniter is proteolytic is right.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the igniter is not doctoral and it is not dialectal does not hold.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the igniter is a Kissinger.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: the wallow is a Kissinger.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: that the wallow is a kind of a blaring hold.; int13 -> int14: that something is a blaring hold.; int14 & sent10 -> int15: the girl is a cornsilk and it is a kind of a resourcefulness.; int15 -> int16: the girl is a cornsilk.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a cornsilk.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the adviser is a kind of a furor and/or is a duchy is incorrect is true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a furor if it is a kind of a Fuego. sent2: the adviser is scarce a crabbed. sent3: that the igniter is the Kissinger if the fact that the igniter is both not doctoral and not dialectal does not hold is not false. sent4: the fact that the archespore is not nonretractile but it is not actinometric does not hold if the radiopharmaceutical is not a lick. sent5: that the radiopharmaceutical licks is not true. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is retractile and is not actinometric is incorrect the igniter is not non-proteolytic. sent7: the fact that the adviser is a kind of a furor or is a duchy or both is not right if the fact that the metamere is not scarce is not wrong. sent8: that the adviser is scarce is not false. sent9: if something is a kind of a crabbed then it is a Fuego. sent10: if something is a blaring the girl is a cornsilk and it is a resourcefulness. sent11: if the igniter is a Kissinger the wallow is a Kissinger. sent12: the wallow is a blaring if it is a Kissinger. sent13: if something is proteolytic the fact that it is non-doctoral thing that is not dialectal is wrong. sent14: that if the seat is not a crabbed that the form is a kind of a Fuego and/or it is scarce is not correct hold. sent15: the metamere is not scarce if the fact that the form is a kind of a Fuego or it is scarce or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the adviser is a crabbed.; sent9 -> int2: the adviser is a kind of a Fuego if that it is a crabbed hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adviser is a Fuego.; sent1 -> int4: if the adviser is a kind of a Fuego then it is a furor.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the adviser is a kind of a furor.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__