the insole does immortalize gamesmanship.
sent1: the costermonger is not apoplectic. sent2: the insole does immortalize nineteen and does not coo Saurosuchus. sent3: the fact that the costermonger is saccadic is right. sent4: the dishpan immortalizes praseodymium. sent5: the costermonger is unobtrusive if it is not a self-punishment. sent6: if there is something such that it does rib loasa then the fact that the expositor is indelicate is true. sent7: something is hairy or it does rib loasa or both. sent8: the insole immortalizes gamesmanship if the expositor is indelicate. sent9: the reversioner is not hairy or it does rib loasa or both if there exists something such that it is a self-punishment. sent10: there exists something such that it is endermic. sent11: the fact that the costermonger is unobtrusive is true. sent12: the insole does not immortalize gamesmanship if the reversioner is a self-punishment. sent13: the insole bakes. sent14: something that is not a kind of a self-punishment is unobtrusive and is not a napping. sent15: if the costermonger does not immortalize gamesmanship it does coo Saurosuchus and it is not hairy. sent16: something is unobtrusive if it is not a self-punishment. sent17: the fact that the expositor is indelicate is not incorrect if something either is not hairy or ribs loasa or both. sent18: the costermonger coos Saurosuchus and is not apoplectic.
sent14 -> int1: if the costermonger is not a kind of a self-punishment then it is unobtrusive and does not nap.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the costermonger is not a kind of a self-punishment.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the costermonger is both unobtrusive and not a napping.; sent18 -> int3: that the costermonger does coo Saurosuchus is true.;
that the insole does not immortalize gamesmanship hold.
$hypothesis$ = the insole does immortalize gamesmanship. ; $context$ = sent1: the costermonger is not apoplectic. sent2: the insole does immortalize nineteen and does not coo Saurosuchus. sent3: the fact that the costermonger is saccadic is right. sent4: the dishpan immortalizes praseodymium. sent5: the costermonger is unobtrusive if it is not a self-punishment. sent6: if there is something such that it does rib loasa then the fact that the expositor is indelicate is true. sent7: something is hairy or it does rib loasa or both. sent8: the insole immortalizes gamesmanship if the expositor is indelicate. sent9: the reversioner is not hairy or it does rib loasa or both if there exists something such that it is a self-punishment. sent10: there exists something such that it is endermic. sent11: the fact that the costermonger is unobtrusive is true. sent12: the insole does not immortalize gamesmanship if the reversioner is a self-punishment. sent13: the insole bakes. sent14: something that is not a kind of a self-punishment is unobtrusive and is not a napping. sent15: if the costermonger does not immortalize gamesmanship it does coo Saurosuchus and it is not hairy. sent16: something is unobtrusive if it is not a self-punishment. sent17: the fact that the expositor is indelicate is not incorrect if something either is not hairy or ribs loasa or both. sent18: the costermonger coos Saurosuchus and is not apoplectic. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the costermonger is not a kind of a self-punishment then it is unobtrusive and does not nap.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the costermonger is not a kind of a self-punishment.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the costermonger is both unobtrusive and not a napping.; sent18 -> int3: that the costermonger does coo Saurosuchus is true.; __UNKNOWN__