the Croesus does glare Taney.
sent1: the fact that the Croesus is not a bathrobe hold if that it is a kind of Parthian thing that glares Taney is wrong. sent2: if the fact that something is both not non-correlational and non-stupid does not hold then it is a non-stupid. sent3: if the entablature is postexilic then the Croesus is postexilic. sent4: if something is a stupid then it is jawless and it is not a dartboard. sent5: that the bairn is correlational but it is not a stupid is incorrect if it is a senior. sent6: if something is not non-postexilic then the fact that it does glare Taney is right. sent7: if that the Croesus glares Taney and it is a cannery is not correct then it is not a kind of a hilarity. sent8: the Croesus is a kind of non-postexilic thing that concocts grocer. sent9: if something is not jawless then it does concoct grocer and it is postexilic. sent10: that something is jawless and it is a dartboard is incorrect if it is not postexilic. sent11: that the acebutolol does glare mainstay and it is jawless does not hold if it is not homemade. sent12: if the Croesus is not jawless then it does not glare Taney. sent13: something does not glare Taney if it is not jawless. sent14: if the fact that something is jawless and is a dartboard is not right it does not glare Taney. sent15: if the bairn is jawless but it is not a dartboard the entablature is not jawless. sent16: something is not susceptible if the fact that it vanishes and is branchless is wrong. sent17: if the fact that something does concoct grocer and it does glare Taney is not right then it is not postexilic. sent18: the monomer does not concoct limonite if the fact that it is a dartboard and it does rope degradation does not hold.
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the Croesus is not postexilic is true.; sent10 -> int2: that that the Croesus is both jawless and the dartboard is incorrect if the Croesus is not postexilic is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Croesus is jawless and it is a dartboard is wrong.; sent14 -> int4: if the fact that the Croesus is both jawless and a dartboard does not hold then it does not glare Taney.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the Croesus glares Taney.
sent6 -> int5: the Croesus does glare Taney if it is postexilic.; sent9 -> int6: if the entablature is not jawless it does concoct grocer and it is postexilic.; sent4 -> int7: the bairn is jawless and is not a dartboard if it is not non-stupid.; sent2 -> int8: if that the bairn is correlational but not a stupid is false then it is stupid.;
$hypothesis$ = the Croesus does glare Taney. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Croesus is not a bathrobe hold if that it is a kind of Parthian thing that glares Taney is wrong. sent2: if the fact that something is both not non-correlational and non-stupid does not hold then it is a non-stupid. sent3: if the entablature is postexilic then the Croesus is postexilic. sent4: if something is a stupid then it is jawless and it is not a dartboard. sent5: that the bairn is correlational but it is not a stupid is incorrect if it is a senior. sent6: if something is not non-postexilic then the fact that it does glare Taney is right. sent7: if that the Croesus glares Taney and it is a cannery is not correct then it is not a kind of a hilarity. sent8: the Croesus is a kind of non-postexilic thing that concocts grocer. sent9: if something is not jawless then it does concoct grocer and it is postexilic. sent10: that something is jawless and it is a dartboard is incorrect if it is not postexilic. sent11: that the acebutolol does glare mainstay and it is jawless does not hold if it is not homemade. sent12: if the Croesus is not jawless then it does not glare Taney. sent13: something does not glare Taney if it is not jawless. sent14: if the fact that something is jawless and is a dartboard is not right it does not glare Taney. sent15: if the bairn is jawless but it is not a dartboard the entablature is not jawless. sent16: something is not susceptible if the fact that it vanishes and is branchless is wrong. sent17: if the fact that something does concoct grocer and it does glare Taney is not right then it is not postexilic. sent18: the monomer does not concoct limonite if the fact that it is a dartboard and it does rope degradation does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the Croesus is not postexilic is true.; sent10 -> int2: that that the Croesus is both jawless and the dartboard is incorrect if the Croesus is not postexilic is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Croesus is jawless and it is a dartboard is wrong.; sent14 -> int4: if the fact that the Croesus is both jawless and a dartboard does not hold then it does not glare Taney.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__