the looting Chartism does not occur but the populating sinus happens.
sent1: the fact that both the slinging and the looting medallion occurs is true. sent2: if the fact that the casting amplification does not occur but the dispersion occurs is not correct then the looting Chartism does not occur. sent3: that both the piousness and the ruggedization happens is caused by that the blaze does not occur. sent4: if the pathologicalness but not the catechism happens then the deferral does not occur. sent5: that the casting amplification happens and the dispersion happens is not correct. sent6: the transitive but not the riveting immotility happens. sent7: not the betrothal but the casting patient happens. sent8: both the dispersion and the slinging occurs if the piousness does not occur. sent9: the remedy does not occur. sent10: if the looking does not occur then the fact that the casting amplification occurs and the dispersion occurs is incorrect. sent11: that the casting amplification does not occur is caused by that the dispersion occurs. sent12: the supernalness but not the remedy happens. sent13: if the casting amplification occurs the looking occurs. sent14: the looking does not occur if the looting medallion happens and the split does not occur. sent15: that the slinging does not occur and/or the dispersion does not occur is brought about by that the piousness occurs. sent16: the slinging occurs. sent17: the populating sinus happens. sent18: that the piaffe but not the accipitrineness happens does not hold. sent19: that the looting Chartism does not occur is brought about by the casting amplification. sent20: the freeing does not occur. sent21: if the ruggedization and the blaze happens the piousness does not occur. sent22: that if the looting medallion does not occur the fact that not the looting Chartism but the populating sinus happens is not true is not wrong. sent23: if both the supernalness and the remedy happens then the split does not occur. sent24: the split does not occur if the supernalness but not the remedying occurs. sent25: that the casting Montmartre does not occur results in that both the blaze and the piaffe happens. sent26: that the casting amplification does not occur but the dispersion occurs does not hold if the looking does not occur. sent27: both the ruggedization and the accipitrineness happens.
sent24 & sent12 -> int1: the split does not occur.; sent1 -> int2: the looting medallion happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the looting medallion but not the split happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the looking does not occur.; int4 & sent26 -> int5: that not the casting amplification but the dispersion happens is wrong.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the looting Chartism does not occur.; int6 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the looting Chartism does not occur and the populating sinus happens is right does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the looting Chartism does not occur but the populating sinus happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the slinging and the looting medallion occurs is true. sent2: if the fact that the casting amplification does not occur but the dispersion occurs is not correct then the looting Chartism does not occur. sent3: that both the piousness and the ruggedization happens is caused by that the blaze does not occur. sent4: if the pathologicalness but not the catechism happens then the deferral does not occur. sent5: that the casting amplification happens and the dispersion happens is not correct. sent6: the transitive but not the riveting immotility happens. sent7: not the betrothal but the casting patient happens. sent8: both the dispersion and the slinging occurs if the piousness does not occur. sent9: the remedy does not occur. sent10: if the looking does not occur then the fact that the casting amplification occurs and the dispersion occurs is incorrect. sent11: that the casting amplification does not occur is caused by that the dispersion occurs. sent12: the supernalness but not the remedy happens. sent13: if the casting amplification occurs the looking occurs. sent14: the looking does not occur if the looting medallion happens and the split does not occur. sent15: that the slinging does not occur and/or the dispersion does not occur is brought about by that the piousness occurs. sent16: the slinging occurs. sent17: the populating sinus happens. sent18: that the piaffe but not the accipitrineness happens does not hold. sent19: that the looting Chartism does not occur is brought about by the casting amplification. sent20: the freeing does not occur. sent21: if the ruggedization and the blaze happens the piousness does not occur. sent22: that if the looting medallion does not occur the fact that not the looting Chartism but the populating sinus happens is not true is not wrong. sent23: if both the supernalness and the remedy happens then the split does not occur. sent24: the split does not occur if the supernalness but not the remedying occurs. sent25: that the casting Montmartre does not occur results in that both the blaze and the piaffe happens. sent26: that the casting amplification does not occur but the dispersion occurs does not hold if the looking does not occur. sent27: both the ruggedization and the accipitrineness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent12 -> int1: the split does not occur.; sent1 -> int2: the looting medallion happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the looting medallion but not the split happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the looking does not occur.; int4 & sent26 -> int5: that not the casting amplification but the dispersion happens is wrong.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the looting Chartism does not occur.; int6 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__