that the finback is not genitourinary or it is not a kind of a Barstow or both is incorrect.
sent1: if something is a silene it is a calm. sent2: that something is episcopal and/or is not genitourinary is not false. sent3: the fact that the finback is not genitourinary or it is not a Barstow or both is not true if the mods does not time. sent4: the mods is not a kind of a Barstow. sent5: that the finback is genitourinary and/or it is not a Barstow is not incorrect. sent6: the mods is not a monism. sent7: everything is episcopal and it is genitourinary. sent8: the topsoil is not a kind of a calm if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a time and it is a kind of a Barstow is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the mods times is not wrong. sent10: if the crankcase is not a monism then it is culinary and it is Aeschylean. sent11: the mods does not calm. sent12: the fact that the mods is a silene and it is episcopal is not true. sent13: if something is a kind of a calm the fact that it is a kind of episcopal thing that is not a time is not right. sent14: the crankcase is not a monism if that it is both a monism and eccrine does not hold. sent15: if the fact that something times but it is not a Barstow is wrong it is not a kind of a times. sent16: that the crankcase is a monism and it is eccrine is incorrect. sent17: the finback is not a Barstow if the mods is a time and is not a calm. sent18: everything is not a silene. sent19: if the fact that the trompillo is episcopal and is not a kind of a time does not hold the mods is not a time. sent20: that something is a time and is a Barstow is false if it is not a silene.
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the mods is both a time and non-calm.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the finback is not a Barstow.; int2 -> hypothesis;
the mods is not a birdnest.
sent15 -> int3: if the fact that the finback is a time but it is not a kind of a Barstow is not true it is not a time.;
$hypothesis$ = that the finback is not genitourinary or it is not a kind of a Barstow or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a silene it is a calm. sent2: that something is episcopal and/or is not genitourinary is not false. sent3: the fact that the finback is not genitourinary or it is not a Barstow or both is not true if the mods does not time. sent4: the mods is not a kind of a Barstow. sent5: that the finback is genitourinary and/or it is not a Barstow is not incorrect. sent6: the mods is not a monism. sent7: everything is episcopal and it is genitourinary. sent8: the topsoil is not a kind of a calm if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a time and it is a kind of a Barstow is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the mods times is not wrong. sent10: if the crankcase is not a monism then it is culinary and it is Aeschylean. sent11: the mods does not calm. sent12: the fact that the mods is a silene and it is episcopal is not true. sent13: if something is a kind of a calm the fact that it is a kind of episcopal thing that is not a time is not right. sent14: the crankcase is not a monism if that it is both a monism and eccrine does not hold. sent15: if the fact that something times but it is not a Barstow is wrong it is not a kind of a times. sent16: that the crankcase is a monism and it is eccrine is incorrect. sent17: the finback is not a Barstow if the mods is a time and is not a calm. sent18: everything is not a silene. sent19: if the fact that the trompillo is episcopal and is not a kind of a time does not hold the mods is not a time. sent20: that something is a time and is a Barstow is false if it is not a silene. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the mods is both a time and non-calm.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the finback is not a Barstow.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__