the unspelling Reynard brings about that the propaedeutic happens but the rustling abductor does not occur.
sent1: the propaedeutic happens and the rustling abductor happens if the tastiness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the unspelling Reynard happens and the tastiness does not occur is false if the propaedeutic does not occur. sent3: the sampling occurs. sent4: if the rustling abductor does not occur then that the rustling Wilder does not occur and/or the despairing temperament happens is incorrect. sent5: if the fact that the unspelling Reynard occurs is not false then the propaedeutic occurs and the rustling abductor happens. sent6: the rustling Wilder happens. sent7: the headway occurs. sent8: the torrentialness occurs if the fact that the rustling Wilder does not occur and/or the despairing temperament occurs is false. sent9: the uncutness does not occur if both the vote and the bewaring occurs. sent10: the dominance happens if the shielding happens. sent11: the fact that the rockslide happens hold. sent12: the discard does not occur. sent13: if the tastiness does not occur then the propaedeutic occurs but the rustling abductor does not occur. sent14: that the rustling Wilder occurs leads to that the despairing temperament occurs. sent15: the uncutness happens. sent16: that the despairing tribologist but not the aperiodicness occurs is brought about by that the summeriness occurs. sent17: the propaedeutic occurs. sent18: if the fungoidness occurs and the incoherentness happens then the Taoist does not occur. sent19: if that the unspelling Reynard but not the tastiness happens is not correct then the do-si-do occurs. sent20: if the tastiness does not occur then the propaedeutic occurs. sent21: the propaedeutic occurs and the rustling abductor occurs. sent22: the fact that the propaedeutic does not occur hold if the uncutness and the hydrokineticness happens. sent23: the tastiness does not occur if both the despairing temperament and the unspelling Reynard occurs. sent24: the propaedeutic occurs if the unspelling Reynard occurs.
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the despairing temperament happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unspelling Reynard happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the despairing temperament and the unspelling Reynard happens.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the tastiness does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the propaedeutic happens but the rustling abductor does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the do-si-do happens and the torrentialness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the unspelling Reynard brings about that the propaedeutic happens but the rustling abductor does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the propaedeutic happens and the rustling abductor happens if the tastiness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the unspelling Reynard happens and the tastiness does not occur is false if the propaedeutic does not occur. sent3: the sampling occurs. sent4: if the rustling abductor does not occur then that the rustling Wilder does not occur and/or the despairing temperament happens is incorrect. sent5: if the fact that the unspelling Reynard occurs is not false then the propaedeutic occurs and the rustling abductor happens. sent6: the rustling Wilder happens. sent7: the headway occurs. sent8: the torrentialness occurs if the fact that the rustling Wilder does not occur and/or the despairing temperament occurs is false. sent9: the uncutness does not occur if both the vote and the bewaring occurs. sent10: the dominance happens if the shielding happens. sent11: the fact that the rockslide happens hold. sent12: the discard does not occur. sent13: if the tastiness does not occur then the propaedeutic occurs but the rustling abductor does not occur. sent14: that the rustling Wilder occurs leads to that the despairing temperament occurs. sent15: the uncutness happens. sent16: that the despairing tribologist but not the aperiodicness occurs is brought about by that the summeriness occurs. sent17: the propaedeutic occurs. sent18: if the fungoidness occurs and the incoherentness happens then the Taoist does not occur. sent19: if that the unspelling Reynard but not the tastiness happens is not correct then the do-si-do occurs. sent20: if the tastiness does not occur then the propaedeutic occurs. sent21: the propaedeutic occurs and the rustling abductor occurs. sent22: the fact that the propaedeutic does not occur hold if the uncutness and the hydrokineticness happens. sent23: the tastiness does not occur if both the despairing temperament and the unspelling Reynard occurs. sent24: the propaedeutic occurs if the unspelling Reynard occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the despairing temperament happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unspelling Reynard happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the despairing temperament and the unspelling Reynard happens.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the tastiness does not occur.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the propaedeutic happens but the rustling abductor does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__