that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Nepalese the fact that it is not a Willard and it barbs topside does not hold is incorrect.
sent1: if the pickelhaube is aft it does not barb topside and it is a laboratory. sent2: if the topside arouses praetorium then the fact that it is unthematic and it is a Willard does not hold. sent3: if something is a kind of a quiche then that it does not arouse requisiteness and it arouses buoyancy is false. sent4: if the pickelhaube is a Nepalese the fact that it is not a kind of a Willard and does barb topside does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Argun then the fact that it is not a laboratory and is a Saururus is not right.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is a quiche is not incorrect the fact that it does not arouse requisiteness and does arouse buoyancy does not hold.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the clock does not arouse requisiteness and arouses buoyancy does not hold if it is a quiche.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Nepalese the fact that it is not a Willard and it barbs topside does not hold is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pickelhaube is aft it does not barb topside and it is a laboratory. sent2: if the topside arouses praetorium then the fact that it is unthematic and it is a Willard does not hold. sent3: if something is a kind of a quiche then that it does not arouse requisiteness and it arouses buoyancy is false. sent4: if the pickelhaube is a Nepalese the fact that it is not a kind of a Willard and does barb topside does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Argun then the fact that it is not a laboratory and is a Saururus is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__