the headhunter is not a playoff.
sent1: if the fact that the voluptuary is an afterimage and is non-syntactic is wrong it is not a xenon. sent2: the fact that something attests and is a kind of a xenon is false if it is not underage. sent3: if the voluptuary does not render Romanism the fact that the starflower render Romanism but it does not attest is wrong. sent4: if the fact that something attests and is a xenon is incorrect then it is not a xenon. sent5: if that the voluptuary is underage is true then that the hypotonicity is syntactic is correct. sent6: the starflower does not remainder exordium if there is something such that the fact that it remainder exordium and it is not a Glycine is not right. sent7: there is something such that that it remainders exordium and it is not a kind of a Glycine is not true. sent8: if the Monophysite is a exogamy the headhunter is a playoff. sent9: something renders Romanism and does not attest if it does not remainder exordium. sent10: the hypotonicity is underage if the voluptuary is a kind of an afterimage and it is syntactic. sent11: the fact that the starflower does render Romanism and attests does not hold. sent12: if the voluptuary is an afterimage but it is not syntactic the hypotonicity is underage. sent13: if the voluptuary is not a xenon then it does not render Romanism. sent14: the Monophysite is a kind of a exogamy if the hypotonicity is underage.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the voluptuary is an afterimage and is not syntactic is not right.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the voluptuary is not a xenon.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the voluptuary does not render Romanism.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the starflower does render Romanism and does not attest is correct is not right.; sent9 -> int4: the starflower does render Romanism and does not attest if it does not remainder exordium.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: the starflower does not remainder exordium.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the starflower renders Romanism and does not attest.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the voluptuary is an afterimage but not syntactic.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the hypotonicity is underage.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: that the Monophysite is a exogamy is correct.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the headhunter is not a playoff hold.
sent4 -> int11: if that the headhunter attests and it is a xenon does not hold then it is not a kind of a xenon.; sent2 -> int12: that the fact that the headhunter attests and is the xenon does not hold if that the headhunter is not underage is not incorrect is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the headhunter is not a playoff. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the voluptuary is an afterimage and is non-syntactic is wrong it is not a xenon. sent2: the fact that something attests and is a kind of a xenon is false if it is not underage. sent3: if the voluptuary does not render Romanism the fact that the starflower render Romanism but it does not attest is wrong. sent4: if the fact that something attests and is a xenon is incorrect then it is not a xenon. sent5: if that the voluptuary is underage is true then that the hypotonicity is syntactic is correct. sent6: the starflower does not remainder exordium if there is something such that the fact that it remainder exordium and it is not a Glycine is not right. sent7: there is something such that that it remainders exordium and it is not a kind of a Glycine is not true. sent8: if the Monophysite is a exogamy the headhunter is a playoff. sent9: something renders Romanism and does not attest if it does not remainder exordium. sent10: the hypotonicity is underage if the voluptuary is a kind of an afterimage and it is syntactic. sent11: the fact that the starflower does render Romanism and attests does not hold. sent12: if the voluptuary is an afterimage but it is not syntactic the hypotonicity is underage. sent13: if the voluptuary is not a xenon then it does not render Romanism. sent14: the Monophysite is a kind of a exogamy if the hypotonicity is underage. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the voluptuary is an afterimage and is not syntactic is not right.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the voluptuary is not a xenon.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the voluptuary does not render Romanism.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the starflower does render Romanism and does not attest is correct is not right.; sent9 -> int4: the starflower does render Romanism and does not attest if it does not remainder exordium.; sent7 & sent6 -> int5: the starflower does not remainder exordium.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the starflower renders Romanism and does not attest.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the voluptuary is an afterimage but not syntactic.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the hypotonicity is underage.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: that the Monophysite is a exogamy is correct.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__