that if the moksa happens that not the journalism but the headquartering courante occurs is not true is not right.
sent1: the fact that the journalism occurs and the headquartering courante occurs is incorrect. sent2: that both the non-Sinhalaness and the burlesqueness happens is not true if the prefixation does not occur. sent3: if the anthropologicalness does not occur then that the journalism and the headquartering courante occurs is incorrect. sent4: that both the adduction and the anthropologicalness occurs causes that the moksa does not occur. sent5: the journalism does not occur and the headquartering courante happens. sent6: the fact that the alchemicness happens and the tonic happens does not hold if the pedesis occurs. sent7: if the resorting happens the fact that not the prefixation but the headquartering barbecue occurs does not hold. sent8: if the anthropologicalness does not occur the fact that the journalism does not occur but the headquartering courante happens is not correct. sent9: that the moksa occurs triggers that not the journalism but the headquartering courante occurs. sent10: if the dinging halitus occurs then the adduction happens. sent11: the fact that the ECCM does not occur but the alchemicness happens is not false if the nominalisticness does not occur. sent12: that the dinging halitus happens is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the moksa happens.; sent10 & sent12 -> int1: the adduction occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the anthropologicalness occurs is not incorrect.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the adduction and the anthropologicalness happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the moksa does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the anthropologicalness does not occur.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that that not the journalism but the headquartering courante occurs is correct is false.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the moksa happens that not the journalism but the headquartering courante occurs is not true is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the journalism occurs and the headquartering courante occurs is incorrect. sent2: that both the non-Sinhalaness and the burlesqueness happens is not true if the prefixation does not occur. sent3: if the anthropologicalness does not occur then that the journalism and the headquartering courante occurs is incorrect. sent4: that both the adduction and the anthropologicalness occurs causes that the moksa does not occur. sent5: the journalism does not occur and the headquartering courante happens. sent6: the fact that the alchemicness happens and the tonic happens does not hold if the pedesis occurs. sent7: if the resorting happens the fact that not the prefixation but the headquartering barbecue occurs does not hold. sent8: if the anthropologicalness does not occur the fact that the journalism does not occur but the headquartering courante happens is not correct. sent9: that the moksa occurs triggers that not the journalism but the headquartering courante occurs. sent10: if the dinging halitus occurs then the adduction happens. sent11: the fact that the ECCM does not occur but the alchemicness happens is not false if the nominalisticness does not occur. sent12: that the dinging halitus happens is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the moksa happens.; sent10 & sent12 -> int1: the adduction occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the anthropologicalness occurs is not incorrect.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the adduction and the anthropologicalness happens.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the moksa does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the anthropologicalness does not occur.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that that not the journalism but the headquartering courante occurs is correct is false.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__