the torchlight does not occur but the scourging glance occurs.
sent1: the reversion does not occur. sent2: if the scourging Tahitian occurs then that the icing does not occur and the torrent does not occur is not true. sent3: the filming occurs. sent4: the embezzlement happens if that the embezzlement does not occur and the mirage does not occur is not correct. sent5: both the emendation and the scourging submersion occurs. sent6: that the emendation happens and the unerectness occurs prevents the embezzlement. sent7: the fact that not the torchlight but the scourging glance occurs is wrong if the dyeing does not occur. sent8: if the unerectness does not occur then the fact that the dyeing does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: the mug happens if the filming happens. sent10: the fact that the embezzlement does not occur and the mirage does not occur does not hold if the fact that the mugging happens is right.
sent5 -> int1: the emendation happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unerectness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the emendation and the unerectness happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the embezzlement does not occur.; sent9 & sent3 -> int4: the mugging happens.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the embezzlement does not occur and the mirage does not occur is not right.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the embezzlement occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the unerectness does not occur.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the dyeing does not occur.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the torchlight does not occur but the scourging glance occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the reversion does not occur. sent2: if the scourging Tahitian occurs then that the icing does not occur and the torrent does not occur is not true. sent3: the filming occurs. sent4: the embezzlement happens if that the embezzlement does not occur and the mirage does not occur is not correct. sent5: both the emendation and the scourging submersion occurs. sent6: that the emendation happens and the unerectness occurs prevents the embezzlement. sent7: the fact that not the torchlight but the scourging glance occurs is wrong if the dyeing does not occur. sent8: if the unerectness does not occur then the fact that the dyeing does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: the mug happens if the filming happens. sent10: the fact that the embezzlement does not occur and the mirage does not occur does not hold if the fact that the mugging happens is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the emendation happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unerectness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the emendation and the unerectness happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the embezzlement does not occur.; sent9 & sent3 -> int4: the mugging happens.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the embezzlement does not occur and the mirage does not occur is not right.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the embezzlement occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the unerectness does not occur.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the dyeing does not occur.; int9 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__