the malingerer is sarcolemmic.
sent1: the siamese traffics myology and it vitriols contradictory. sent2: that either the uraninite is not unstuck or it is not a geminate or both is wrong if the hemp is not a kind of a geminate. sent3: that the egghead is not cyprinid and it is not superhuman is not correct. sent4: something is not unstuck if that it is unstuck and it is not sarcolemmic does not hold. sent5: the hemp does not geminate if that that the egghead is not cyprinid and it is not superhuman is wrong is correct. sent6: if that the fact that either the uraninite is not unstuck or it is not a kind of a geminate or both hold is not true then the siamese is not angiomatous. sent7: the fact that something is a geminate and it is a kind of an incident is incorrect if it is not unstuck. sent8: the malingerer is not non-sarcolemmic if the siamese is not incident and not angiomatous. sent9: the siamese is a Stromateidae and it does redirect thymosin. sent10: the fact that the egghead is cyprinid and non-sarcolemmic is wrong. sent11: the uraninite bespeaks.
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the hemp is not a geminate.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the uraninite is not unstuck or it is not a geminate or both is not true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the siamese is not angiomatous.; sent9 -> int4: the siamese is a Stromateidae.; sent1 -> int5: the siamese does traffic myology.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the siamese is a kind of a Stromateidae and traffics myology.;
that the malingerer does not traffic myology hold.
sent4 -> int7: the uraninite is not unstuck if that it is unstuck and is not sarcolemmic does not hold.; sent7 -> int8: the fact that that the hemp is the geminate and incident is incorrect if the hemp is not unstuck is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the malingerer is sarcolemmic. ; $context$ = sent1: the siamese traffics myology and it vitriols contradictory. sent2: that either the uraninite is not unstuck or it is not a geminate or both is wrong if the hemp is not a kind of a geminate. sent3: that the egghead is not cyprinid and it is not superhuman is not correct. sent4: something is not unstuck if that it is unstuck and it is not sarcolemmic does not hold. sent5: the hemp does not geminate if that that the egghead is not cyprinid and it is not superhuman is wrong is correct. sent6: if that the fact that either the uraninite is not unstuck or it is not a kind of a geminate or both hold is not true then the siamese is not angiomatous. sent7: the fact that something is a geminate and it is a kind of an incident is incorrect if it is not unstuck. sent8: the malingerer is not non-sarcolemmic if the siamese is not incident and not angiomatous. sent9: the siamese is a Stromateidae and it does redirect thymosin. sent10: the fact that the egghead is cyprinid and non-sarcolemmic is wrong. sent11: the uraninite bespeaks. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the hemp is not a geminate.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the uraninite is not unstuck or it is not a geminate or both is not true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the siamese is not angiomatous.; sent9 -> int4: the siamese is a Stromateidae.; sent1 -> int5: the siamese does traffic myology.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the siamese is a kind of a Stromateidae and traffics myology.; __UNKNOWN__