that the pubicness does not occur is right.
sent1: the neurosurgery results in the strengthening. sent2: the neurosurgery does not occur if the fact that the hopscotch does not occur and the asceticism does not occur is not true. sent3: the falling rested does not occur if that the interrelating Schinus and/or the redecorating pivot occurs is wrong. sent4: that that the fictionalness does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur does not hold hold. sent5: the functionalness happens. sent6: the redecorating Fuscoboletinus does not occur if either the warming happens or the redecorating Fuscoboletinus does not occur or both. sent7: if that either the falling rested does not occur or the masturbating does not occur or both is wrong then the analyticness occurs. sent8: the redecorating pivot occurs if the masturbating does not occur. sent9: if both the masturbating and the strengthening happens the pubicness does not occur. sent10: either the warmness happens or the redecorating Fuscoboletinus does not occur or both if the correction occurs. sent11: the fact that the fact that either the falling rested does not occur or the masturbating does not occur or both hold is wrong if the strengthening does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the fictionalness does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur is not true then the strengthening occurs. sent13: that the redecorating pivot happens is not incorrect. sent14: if the strengthening does not occur then the fact that the falling rested does not occur and the masturbating does not occur does not hold. sent15: that the falling rested occurs is brought about by that the acceptance happens. sent16: that the fact that the hopscotch does not occur and the asceticism does not occur does not hold if the redecorating Fuscoboletinus does not occur is not wrong. sent17: the fact that the interrelating Schinus happens and/or the redecorating pivot does not occur is not right if the masturbating does not occur. sent18: that both the non-fictionalness and the neurosurgery occurs is not correct. sent19: the strengthening does not occur if both the non-functionalness and the acceptance occurs. sent20: if that either the interrelating Schinus occurs or the redecorating pivot does not occur or both is wrong the falling rested does not occur. sent21: that the acceptance does not occur is prevented by that the functionalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the masturbating does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that either the interrelating Schinus occurs or the redecorating pivot does not occur or both is wrong.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the falling rested does not occur.; sent21 & sent5 -> int3: the acceptance happens.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the falling rested occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the masturbating occurs.; sent12 & sent4 -> int7: the strengthening occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: both the masturbating and the strengthening happens.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the pubicness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the pubicness does not occur is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the neurosurgery results in the strengthening. sent2: the neurosurgery does not occur if the fact that the hopscotch does not occur and the asceticism does not occur is not true. sent3: the falling rested does not occur if that the interrelating Schinus and/or the redecorating pivot occurs is wrong. sent4: that that the fictionalness does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur does not hold hold. sent5: the functionalness happens. sent6: the redecorating Fuscoboletinus does not occur if either the warming happens or the redecorating Fuscoboletinus does not occur or both. sent7: if that either the falling rested does not occur or the masturbating does not occur or both is wrong then the analyticness occurs. sent8: the redecorating pivot occurs if the masturbating does not occur. sent9: if both the masturbating and the strengthening happens the pubicness does not occur. sent10: either the warmness happens or the redecorating Fuscoboletinus does not occur or both if the correction occurs. sent11: the fact that the fact that either the falling rested does not occur or the masturbating does not occur or both hold is wrong if the strengthening does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the fictionalness does not occur and the neurosurgery does not occur is not true then the strengthening occurs. sent13: that the redecorating pivot happens is not incorrect. sent14: if the strengthening does not occur then the fact that the falling rested does not occur and the masturbating does not occur does not hold. sent15: that the falling rested occurs is brought about by that the acceptance happens. sent16: that the fact that the hopscotch does not occur and the asceticism does not occur does not hold if the redecorating Fuscoboletinus does not occur is not wrong. sent17: the fact that the interrelating Schinus happens and/or the redecorating pivot does not occur is not right if the masturbating does not occur. sent18: that both the non-fictionalness and the neurosurgery occurs is not correct. sent19: the strengthening does not occur if both the non-functionalness and the acceptance occurs. sent20: if that either the interrelating Schinus occurs or the redecorating pivot does not occur or both is wrong the falling rested does not occur. sent21: that the acceptance does not occur is prevented by that the functionalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the masturbating does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that either the interrelating Schinus occurs or the redecorating pivot does not occur or both is wrong.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the falling rested does not occur.; sent21 & sent5 -> int3: the acceptance happens.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the falling rested occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the masturbating occurs.; sent12 & sent4 -> int7: the strengthening occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: both the masturbating and the strengthening happens.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__