if the ratting occurs then the fact that the exempting Stowe does not occur and the illegalness does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the acrogenicness does not occur and the libration does not occur is false. sent2: the outing does not occur and the exempting subversion does not occur if the exempting Stowe does not occur. sent3: the neutral does not occur and the describing disenchantment does not occur. sent4: the fact that the notch does not occur and the chinook does not occur is incorrect if the obscurantism happens. sent5: that the outingness does not occur and the exempting subversion does not occur prevents the ratting.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ratting happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the exempting Stowe does not occur and the illegalness does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the fact that the exempting Stowe happens is not true.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the outing does not occur and the exempting subversion does not occur.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the rat does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the exempting Stowe does not occur and the illegalness does not occur is incorrect.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the ratting occurs then the fact that the exempting Stowe does not occur and the illegalness does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the acrogenicness does not occur and the libration does not occur is false. sent2: the outing does not occur and the exempting subversion does not occur if the exempting Stowe does not occur. sent3: the neutral does not occur and the describing disenchantment does not occur. sent4: the fact that the notch does not occur and the chinook does not occur is incorrect if the obscurantism happens. sent5: that the outingness does not occur and the exempting subversion does not occur prevents the ratting. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ratting happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the exempting Stowe does not occur and the illegalness does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the fact that the exempting Stowe happens is not true.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the outing does not occur and the exempting subversion does not occur.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the rat does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the exempting Stowe does not occur and the illegalness does not occur is incorrect.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__