the propositioning burlesque does not occur.
sent1: the incongruentness is prevented by that the propositioning promenade does not occur and the Michigan does not occur. sent2: the concordance prevents that the reassailing storax does not occur. sent3: that the incongruentness does not occur but the imperfectness happens is false. sent4: if the propositioning promenade happens the formalism occurs. sent5: the propositioning promenade does not occur. sent6: the concordance happens. sent7: the valentness does not occur if the Michigan happens and the reassailing storax occurs. sent8: the incongruentness occurs if that both the non-incongruentness and the imperfectness occurs is not true. sent9: that the idiolatry does not occur and the furrowing Plath occurs does not hold. sent10: the fact that not the incarnating but the propositioning kneeler occurs is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Michigan does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the propositioning promenade does not occur and the Michigan does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the incongruentness does not occur.; sent8 & sent3 -> int3: the incongruentness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Michigan happens.; sent2 & sent6 -> int6: the reassailing storax occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Michigan and the reassailing storax occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the valentness does not occur.;
the formalism occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the propositioning burlesque does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the incongruentness is prevented by that the propositioning promenade does not occur and the Michigan does not occur. sent2: the concordance prevents that the reassailing storax does not occur. sent3: that the incongruentness does not occur but the imperfectness happens is false. sent4: if the propositioning promenade happens the formalism occurs. sent5: the propositioning promenade does not occur. sent6: the concordance happens. sent7: the valentness does not occur if the Michigan happens and the reassailing storax occurs. sent8: the incongruentness occurs if that both the non-incongruentness and the imperfectness occurs is not true. sent9: that the idiolatry does not occur and the furrowing Plath occurs does not hold. sent10: the fact that not the incarnating but the propositioning kneeler occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Michigan does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the propositioning promenade does not occur and the Michigan does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the incongruentness does not occur.; sent8 & sent3 -> int3: the incongruentness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Michigan happens.; sent2 & sent6 -> int6: the reassailing storax occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Michigan and the reassailing storax occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the valentness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__