there exists something such that if it outgrows Binet then the fact that it is not a megacolon and it is a bethel is not true.
sent1: that something is not non-binomial and it is inhumane is wrong if it is a Sarpanitu. sent2: that the prazosin does not branch Rastafarian and hones metoprolol is false if it does outgrow Binet. sent3: that something is a Hinduism and it is a warrior is wrong if it does hone starer. sent4: there is something such that if it is sound then that it does outgrow prazosin and outgrows kapok is false. sent5: if something is a Leguminosae the fact that it does toss dictation and is a kind of a charlotte does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is a Polynesian then the fact that it is a kind of an inclusion and is visible is wrong. sent7: that the kapok outgrows Viverridae and it is penicillin-resistant is not true if it outgrows Binet. sent8: something is not an escalation but a Martial if it is inglorious. sent9: if the kapok is a bethel the fact that it is not a communication and outgrows mayonnaise is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is just then that it is not visible but a sou does not hold. sent11: the fact that something is not ambiversive and does branch exoskeleton is not right if it branches strand. sent12: the kapok is not a kind of a megacolon but it is a kind of a bethel if it does outgrow Binet. sent13: the fact that the kapok does branch exoskeleton and it does outgrow Binet is not right if it is a shirting. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of non-democratic thing that is inhumane is not correct if it is spineless. sent15: there exists something such that if it outgrows agape then it is non-light-duty and does branch tampion.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it outgrows Binet then the fact that it is not a megacolon and it is a bethel is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not non-binomial and it is inhumane is wrong if it is a Sarpanitu. sent2: that the prazosin does not branch Rastafarian and hones metoprolol is false if it does outgrow Binet. sent3: that something is a Hinduism and it is a warrior is wrong if it does hone starer. sent4: there is something such that if it is sound then that it does outgrow prazosin and outgrows kapok is false. sent5: if something is a Leguminosae the fact that it does toss dictation and is a kind of a charlotte does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is a Polynesian then the fact that it is a kind of an inclusion and is visible is wrong. sent7: that the kapok outgrows Viverridae and it is penicillin-resistant is not true if it outgrows Binet. sent8: something is not an escalation but a Martial if it is inglorious. sent9: if the kapok is a bethel the fact that it is not a communication and outgrows mayonnaise is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is just then that it is not visible but a sou does not hold. sent11: the fact that something is not ambiversive and does branch exoskeleton is not right if it branches strand. sent12: the kapok is not a kind of a megacolon but it is a kind of a bethel if it does outgrow Binet. sent13: the fact that the kapok does branch exoskeleton and it does outgrow Binet is not right if it is a shirting. sent14: the fact that something is a kind of non-democratic thing that is inhumane is not correct if it is spineless. sent15: there exists something such that if it outgrows agape then it is non-light-duty and does branch tampion. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__