the adenocarcinomatousness occurs.
sent1: if the undoing occurs then the overstraining trove occurs. sent2: the adenocarcinomatousness happens if the overstraining trove happens. sent3: if the fact that both the non-deductiveness and the non-cytophotometricness occurs does not hold then the deductiveness happens. sent4: the limnologicalness occurs. sent5: that the deductiveness occurs results in that not the undoing but the overstraining trove happens. sent6: that the fact that both the non-deductiveness and the non-cytophotometricness occurs is not wrong is wrong if the erasure does not occur. sent7: the fact that the handing mortarboard occurs hold. sent8: the departing occurs. sent9: that the departing occurs prevents that the undoing does not occur.
sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the undoing happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the overstraining trove occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the adenocarcinomatousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the undoing occurs then the overstraining trove occurs. sent2: the adenocarcinomatousness happens if the overstraining trove happens. sent3: if the fact that both the non-deductiveness and the non-cytophotometricness occurs does not hold then the deductiveness happens. sent4: the limnologicalness occurs. sent5: that the deductiveness occurs results in that not the undoing but the overstraining trove happens. sent6: that the fact that both the non-deductiveness and the non-cytophotometricness occurs is not wrong is wrong if the erasure does not occur. sent7: the fact that the handing mortarboard occurs hold. sent8: the departing occurs. sent9: that the departing occurs prevents that the undoing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the undoing happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the overstraining trove occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__