that there exists something such that if it does manacle then it is both not a hare and not a Gounod does not hold.
sent1: the goffer is not a Alnico and it is not spermicidal if it does piece capercaillie. sent2: if something does brecciate it is both not a skiff and not Russian. sent3: there is something such that if it does piece boisterousness then it does not scuff freestone and it is not a leveret. sent4: there exists something such that if it does manacle then it is not a Gounod. sent5: if something does scuff tonicity then it does not pyramid and it is not a respondent. sent6: there is something such that if it does manacle then it does not hare and it is a Gounod. sent7: there is something such that if that it bums hold then it is not divisional and it does not scuff tonicity. sent8: if the fact that the goffer is a Gounod is right it does not coarsen and is not macromolecular. sent9: there exists something such that if it does manacle then it hares and is not a Gounod. sent10: the goffer is both a hare and not a Gounod if it manacles. sent11: there is something such that if it is a suggester then it does not piece minder and does not clone aikido. sent12: if something does manacle it is not a hare and it is not a Gounod. sent13: if the boisterousness does temporize then it is not digestible and not a hare. sent14: there is something such that if it manacles then it is not a hare. sent15: if the goffer does manacle then it is not a Gounod.
sent12 -> int1: the goffer is not a hare and not a Gounod if it manacles.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does manacle then it is both not a hare and not a Gounod does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the goffer is not a Alnico and it is not spermicidal if it does piece capercaillie. sent2: if something does brecciate it is both not a skiff and not Russian. sent3: there is something such that if it does piece boisterousness then it does not scuff freestone and it is not a leveret. sent4: there exists something such that if it does manacle then it is not a Gounod. sent5: if something does scuff tonicity then it does not pyramid and it is not a respondent. sent6: there is something such that if it does manacle then it does not hare and it is a Gounod. sent7: there is something such that if that it bums hold then it is not divisional and it does not scuff tonicity. sent8: if the fact that the goffer is a Gounod is right it does not coarsen and is not macromolecular. sent9: there exists something such that if it does manacle then it hares and is not a Gounod. sent10: the goffer is both a hare and not a Gounod if it manacles. sent11: there is something such that if it is a suggester then it does not piece minder and does not clone aikido. sent12: if something does manacle it is not a hare and it is not a Gounod. sent13: if the boisterousness does temporize then it is not digestible and not a hare. sent14: there is something such that if it manacles then it is not a hare. sent15: if the goffer does manacle then it is not a Gounod. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the goffer is not a hare and not a Gounod if it manacles.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__