the reverberantness does not occur.
sent1: if the auroralness does not occur then the rowing does not occur. sent2: if the appropriativeness happens the resultant happens. sent3: the fact that the excluding occurs and the appropriativeness does not occur is not correct if the rowing does not occur. sent4: the fact that the indiscernibleness and the excluding happens is not incorrect. sent5: that the non-unsavoriness and the non-reverberantness occurs is triggered by that the resultant happens.
sent4 -> int1: that the excluding occurs is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appropriativeness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the excluding and the non-appropriativeness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the reverberantness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the auroralness does not occur then the rowing does not occur. sent2: if the appropriativeness happens the resultant happens. sent3: the fact that the excluding occurs and the appropriativeness does not occur is not correct if the rowing does not occur. sent4: the fact that the indiscernibleness and the excluding happens is not incorrect. sent5: that the non-unsavoriness and the non-reverberantness occurs is triggered by that the resultant happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the excluding occurs is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appropriativeness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the excluding and the non-appropriativeness happens.; __UNKNOWN__