the dogmatizing freight occurs.
sent1: the fact that the dogmatizing freight does not occur is not false if the pricking does not occur. sent2: the boricness does not occur. sent3: the nepotism occurs. sent4: the extinctness occurs. sent5: that the retrial occurs is prevented by that both the prick and the nepotism happens. sent6: that the familialness occurs is not false. sent7: the stapling Shirer occurs if both the sincereness and the non-boricness occurs. sent8: the bunking turnstile and the rounded occurs. sent9: that the dogmatizing freight does not occur is prevented by the stapling Shirer. sent10: the pricking happens. sent11: the eventuating happens but the dowsing does not occur. sent12: that the retrial does not occur leads to that the sincereness and the non-boricness happens. sent13: the unrhetoricalness occurs if the lobbying occurs. sent14: if the sincereness occurs and the boricness occurs the stapling Shirer occurs. sent15: the boricness does not occur if the retrial does not occur. sent16: that the prefecturalness happens is true. sent17: the sarcosomalness is triggered by that the dogmatizing aggressiveness but not the tattle happens. sent18: the fact that the hilarness occurs and the basket happens is correct. sent19: if the Spanishness does not occur both the acidifying and the non-textualness happens. sent20: the schizophrenic does not occur. sent21: the gracefulness does not occur. sent22: the dorsalness and the vibrationalness happens.
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the pricking and the nepotism happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the retrial does not occur.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: both the sincereness and the non-boricness occurs.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the stapling Shirer occurs.; sent9 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the dogmatizing freight does not occur is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the dogmatizing freight occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the dogmatizing freight does not occur is not false if the pricking does not occur. sent2: the boricness does not occur. sent3: the nepotism occurs. sent4: the extinctness occurs. sent5: that the retrial occurs is prevented by that both the prick and the nepotism happens. sent6: that the familialness occurs is not false. sent7: the stapling Shirer occurs if both the sincereness and the non-boricness occurs. sent8: the bunking turnstile and the rounded occurs. sent9: that the dogmatizing freight does not occur is prevented by the stapling Shirer. sent10: the pricking happens. sent11: the eventuating happens but the dowsing does not occur. sent12: that the retrial does not occur leads to that the sincereness and the non-boricness happens. sent13: the unrhetoricalness occurs if the lobbying occurs. sent14: if the sincereness occurs and the boricness occurs the stapling Shirer occurs. sent15: the boricness does not occur if the retrial does not occur. sent16: that the prefecturalness happens is true. sent17: the sarcosomalness is triggered by that the dogmatizing aggressiveness but not the tattle happens. sent18: the fact that the hilarness occurs and the basket happens is correct. sent19: if the Spanishness does not occur both the acidifying and the non-textualness happens. sent20: the schizophrenic does not occur. sent21: the gracefulness does not occur. sent22: the dorsalness and the vibrationalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the pricking and the nepotism happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the retrial does not occur.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: both the sincereness and the non-boricness occurs.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the stapling Shirer occurs.; sent9 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__