that if that the hemiparasite is thermostatic hold that the brim is not a deoxyguanosine and it is not completed does not hold is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the carpophore does not carpet introduction hold if the hemiparasite is thermostatic. sent2: if there is something such that it does not carpet introduction then the fact that that the brim is not a kind of a deoxyguanosine and does not complete is correct is not right. sent3: the brim is not a kind of a deoxyguanosine and it is not thermostatic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hemiparasite is thermostatic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the carpophore does not carpet introduction.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not carpet introduction.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the brim is not a deoxyguanosine and does not complete is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if that the hemiparasite is thermostatic hold that the brim is not a deoxyguanosine and it is not completed does not hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the carpophore does not carpet introduction hold if the hemiparasite is thermostatic. sent2: if there is something such that it does not carpet introduction then the fact that that the brim is not a kind of a deoxyguanosine and does not complete is correct is not right. sent3: the brim is not a kind of a deoxyguanosine and it is not thermostatic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hemiparasite is thermostatic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the carpophore does not carpet introduction.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not carpet introduction.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the brim is not a deoxyguanosine and does not complete is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__