that the cyclonicness does not occur but the trabecularness occurs is not true.
sent1: that the K.E. does not occur and the peregrination does not occur is wrong if the polyhedralness does not occur. sent2: the trabecularness happens. sent3: the K.E. does not occur and the peregrination does not occur if the cleaving autoloader does not occur. sent4: if the amendment does not occur the cleaving autoloader does not occur. sent5: the fact that if that either the decimalization does not occur or the amendment does not occur or both is wrong then the warp does not occur is correct. sent6: that the cleaving autoloader does not occur is not false if the decimalization does not occur. sent7: the jam does not occur but the unrespectableness happens if the warp does not occur. sent8: the polyhedralness does not occur. sent9: that the jam does not occur and the unrespectableness happens brings about that the cyclonicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decimalization does not occur or the amendment does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the cleaving autoloader does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the K.E. does not occur and the peregrination does not occur.; sent1 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the K.E. does not occur and the peregrination does not occur is not right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the decimalization does not occur or the amendment does not occur or both does not hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the warp does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: not the jam but the unrespectableness occurs.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the cyclonicness does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the cyclonicness does not occur but the trabecularness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the K.E. does not occur and the peregrination does not occur is wrong if the polyhedralness does not occur. sent2: the trabecularness happens. sent3: the K.E. does not occur and the peregrination does not occur if the cleaving autoloader does not occur. sent4: if the amendment does not occur the cleaving autoloader does not occur. sent5: the fact that if that either the decimalization does not occur or the amendment does not occur or both is wrong then the warp does not occur is correct. sent6: that the cleaving autoloader does not occur is not false if the decimalization does not occur. sent7: the jam does not occur but the unrespectableness happens if the warp does not occur. sent8: the polyhedralness does not occur. sent9: that the jam does not occur and the unrespectableness happens brings about that the cyclonicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decimalization does not occur or the amendment does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the cleaving autoloader does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the K.E. does not occur and the peregrination does not occur.; sent1 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the K.E. does not occur and the peregrination does not occur is not right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the decimalization does not occur or the amendment does not occur or both does not hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the warp does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: not the jam but the unrespectableness occurs.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the cyclonicness does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__