the mohawk is not a toy.
sent1: the technocrat is not a chenille if the archer is not a lantana. sent2: the mohawk is a toy if that the caretaker is not a kind of a amputator or it is a pemphigus or both does not hold. sent3: that the caretaker is not a kind of an environment is right if that the Algonquian is not a amputator or it is not a pemphigus or both does not hold. sent4: the acetum is a kind of a gangliocyte. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the massager is not an introvert and not a lantana is not wrong is not correct then the archer is not a lantana. sent6: the fact that the caretaker is an environment hold. sent7: if the caretaker is not a toy but it is a Dutch the fact that the mohawk is not a toy hold. sent8: if the acetum is a gangliocyte the fact that the massager is both not an introvert and not a lantana is not correct. sent9: if that the caretaker is not an environment is not incorrect then the gunman is a kind of Dutch a Chandler. sent10: if something is not a kind of a Dutch that it is not a amputator or it is a pemphigus or both is not right. sent11: the Algonquian is not a chenille and not smooth. sent12: the Algonquian is not a Chandler if the caretaker is a Dutch and it is a kind of an environment. sent13: either something is not a pemphigus or it is not a Chandler or both if that it is not a amputator is correct. sent14: if the fact that something smooths and it is a amputator is false it is not a amputator. sent15: if something that is not a chenille does not smooth it is a Chandler. sent16: that the caretaker is not a toy and is a kind of a Dutch is not false if the Algonquian is not an environment.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caretaker is Dutch.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the caretaker is both a Dutch and an environment.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the Algonquian is not a Chandler is right.; sent15 -> int3: if the Algonquian is not a chenille and is not a kind of a smooth it is a Chandler.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the Algonquian is a Chandler.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the caretaker is not Dutch is correct.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the caretaker is not a amputator or is a kind of a pemphigus or both does not hold if it is not a Dutch.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the caretaker is not a amputator and/or is a pemphigus is not correct.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the mohawk is not a toy.
sent13 -> int9: if the Algonquian is not a kind of a amputator it is not a pemphigus or it is not a Chandler or both.; sent14 -> int10: the Algonquian is not a amputator if that it is smooth a amputator is not right.; sent8 & sent4 -> int11: the fact that the massager is not a kind of an introvert and it is not a lantana is not true.; sent5 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the archer is a kind of a lantana is incorrect.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: the technocrat is not a kind of a chenille.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not a chenille.;
$hypothesis$ = the mohawk is not a toy. ; $context$ = sent1: the technocrat is not a chenille if the archer is not a lantana. sent2: the mohawk is a toy if that the caretaker is not a kind of a amputator or it is a pemphigus or both does not hold. sent3: that the caretaker is not a kind of an environment is right if that the Algonquian is not a amputator or it is not a pemphigus or both does not hold. sent4: the acetum is a kind of a gangliocyte. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the massager is not an introvert and not a lantana is not wrong is not correct then the archer is not a lantana. sent6: the fact that the caretaker is an environment hold. sent7: if the caretaker is not a toy but it is a Dutch the fact that the mohawk is not a toy hold. sent8: if the acetum is a gangliocyte the fact that the massager is both not an introvert and not a lantana is not correct. sent9: if that the caretaker is not an environment is not incorrect then the gunman is a kind of Dutch a Chandler. sent10: if something is not a kind of a Dutch that it is not a amputator or it is a pemphigus or both is not right. sent11: the Algonquian is not a chenille and not smooth. sent12: the Algonquian is not a Chandler if the caretaker is a Dutch and it is a kind of an environment. sent13: either something is not a pemphigus or it is not a Chandler or both if that it is not a amputator is correct. sent14: if the fact that something smooths and it is a amputator is false it is not a amputator. sent15: if something that is not a chenille does not smooth it is a Chandler. sent16: that the caretaker is not a toy and is a kind of a Dutch is not false if the Algonquian is not an environment. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caretaker is Dutch.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the caretaker is both a Dutch and an environment.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the Algonquian is not a Chandler is right.; sent15 -> int3: if the Algonquian is not a chenille and is not a kind of a smooth it is a Chandler.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the Algonquian is a Chandler.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the caretaker is not Dutch is correct.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the caretaker is not a amputator or is a kind of a pemphigus or both does not hold if it is not a Dutch.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the caretaker is not a amputator and/or is a pemphigus is not correct.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__