the sadist does shore Limulus.
sent1: the procuress is not discriminate and it does shore seed. sent2: the fact that the slops is not a Percheron and shores galea is incorrect if that the genipap is not a kind of a Percheron is not wrong. sent3: the sadist shores Limulus if that the slops is not a Percheron but it shores galea is not right. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of a oology and is not a kind of a skim is incorrect if it does widen. sent5: the sadist is not indiscriminate if the fact that the genipap is a kind of non-indiscriminate thing that does shore galea does not hold. sent6: if something is a kind of a Percheron then it does not shore Limulus. sent7: that the genipap does not shore severity and does not shore rockers is wrong if it is a Percheron. sent8: that the genipap does not shore severity and does shore rockers is not correct if it is a Percheron. sent9: if the fact that the genipap does not shore severity and it does not shore rockers is not true then the opossum is a oology. sent10: something is indiscriminate if it is a oology.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genipap is a Percheron.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the genipap does not shore severity and it does not shore rockers is not right.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the opossum is not a oology does not hold.; sent10 -> int3: the opossum is indiscriminate if it is a oology.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the opossum is indiscriminate.;
the sadist does not shore Limulus.
sent6 -> int5: if the sadist is a Percheron then it does not shore Limulus.;
$hypothesis$ = the sadist does shore Limulus. ; $context$ = sent1: the procuress is not discriminate and it does shore seed. sent2: the fact that the slops is not a Percheron and shores galea is incorrect if that the genipap is not a kind of a Percheron is not wrong. sent3: the sadist shores Limulus if that the slops is not a Percheron but it shores galea is not right. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of a oology and is not a kind of a skim is incorrect if it does widen. sent5: the sadist is not indiscriminate if the fact that the genipap is a kind of non-indiscriminate thing that does shore galea does not hold. sent6: if something is a kind of a Percheron then it does not shore Limulus. sent7: that the genipap does not shore severity and does not shore rockers is wrong if it is a Percheron. sent8: that the genipap does not shore severity and does shore rockers is not correct if it is a Percheron. sent9: if the fact that the genipap does not shore severity and it does not shore rockers is not true then the opossum is a oology. sent10: something is indiscriminate if it is a oology. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genipap is a Percheron.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the genipap does not shore severity and it does not shore rockers is not right.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the opossum is not a oology does not hold.; sent10 -> int3: the opossum is indiscriminate if it is a oology.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the opossum is indiscriminate.; __UNKNOWN__