the stockinet is a Dido and does squawk crinoid.
sent1: the autoradiograph treats snowcap if the angioscope does not treats snowcap but it is chirpy. sent2: that the stockinet does squawk crinoid is correct if that it treats snowcap and it is not a Ishtar is false. sent3: if the heliometer treats Ixodidae then the stockinet is not prosthetic and it does not treats Ixodidae. sent4: the fact that the lash is both multilateral and not prosthetic is wrong if that it is a dollhouse is right. sent5: if the fact that that the stockinet is not chirpy is not wrong is not right that it treats snowcap and it is not a Ishtar is not true. sent6: the stockinet is a mung. sent7: if a non-prosthetic thing does not treat Ixodidae it is chemotherapeutic. sent8: if the VDU is not fistulous but it is trustful it is chirpy. sent9: there is something such that it does treat Ixodidae. sent10: if the angioscope is not a kind of a Ishtar then that it does not treat snowcap and is chirpy is correct. sent11: the stockinet squawks heliometer. sent12: the stockinet is chirpy. sent13: that the stockinet does not treat Ixodidae and it does not squawk crinoid does not hold if something does squawk crinoid. sent14: the minefield is not prosthetic and is chemotherapeutic if the autoradiograph treats snowcap. sent15: that the heliometer is not unconstitutional and it does not treat Ixodidae is not right if something treat Ixodidae. sent16: something is a Dido if it is chemotherapeutic. sent17: the fact that the saury does not treat Ixodidae and/or is not unconstitutional does not hold if the minefield is not prosthetic. sent18: the heliometer is not unconstitutional.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heliometer does not treat Ixodidae.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the heliometer is a kind of non-unconstitutional thing that does not treat Ixodidae.; sent9 & sent15 -> int2: that the heliometer is a kind of non-unconstitutional thing that does not treat Ixodidae is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the heliometer does treat Ixodidae.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the stockinet is non-prosthetic thing that does not treat Ixodidae.; sent7 -> int6: if the stockinet is non-prosthetic thing that does not treat Ixodidae it is chemotherapeutic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the stockinet is chemotherapeutic is true.; sent16 -> int8: the fact that the stockinet is a kind of a Dido is right if it is chemotherapeutic.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stockinet is a Dido.; sent5 & sent12 -> int10: the fact that the stockinet does treat snowcap and is not a Ishtar is not correct.; sent2 & int10 -> int11: the stockinet squawks crinoid.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the stockinet is a Dido and it squawks crinoid is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the stockinet is a Dido and does squawk crinoid. ; $context$ = sent1: the autoradiograph treats snowcap if the angioscope does not treats snowcap but it is chirpy. sent2: that the stockinet does squawk crinoid is correct if that it treats snowcap and it is not a Ishtar is false. sent3: if the heliometer treats Ixodidae then the stockinet is not prosthetic and it does not treats Ixodidae. sent4: the fact that the lash is both multilateral and not prosthetic is wrong if that it is a dollhouse is right. sent5: if the fact that that the stockinet is not chirpy is not wrong is not right that it treats snowcap and it is not a Ishtar is not true. sent6: the stockinet is a mung. sent7: if a non-prosthetic thing does not treat Ixodidae it is chemotherapeutic. sent8: if the VDU is not fistulous but it is trustful it is chirpy. sent9: there is something such that it does treat Ixodidae. sent10: if the angioscope is not a kind of a Ishtar then that it does not treat snowcap and is chirpy is correct. sent11: the stockinet squawks heliometer. sent12: the stockinet is chirpy. sent13: that the stockinet does not treat Ixodidae and it does not squawk crinoid does not hold if something does squawk crinoid. sent14: the minefield is not prosthetic and is chemotherapeutic if the autoradiograph treats snowcap. sent15: that the heliometer is not unconstitutional and it does not treat Ixodidae is not right if something treat Ixodidae. sent16: something is a Dido if it is chemotherapeutic. sent17: the fact that the saury does not treat Ixodidae and/or is not unconstitutional does not hold if the minefield is not prosthetic. sent18: the heliometer is not unconstitutional. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heliometer does not treat Ixodidae.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the heliometer is a kind of non-unconstitutional thing that does not treat Ixodidae.; sent9 & sent15 -> int2: that the heliometer is a kind of non-unconstitutional thing that does not treat Ixodidae is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the heliometer does treat Ixodidae.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the stockinet is non-prosthetic thing that does not treat Ixodidae.; sent7 -> int6: if the stockinet is non-prosthetic thing that does not treat Ixodidae it is chemotherapeutic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the stockinet is chemotherapeutic is true.; sent16 -> int8: the fact that the stockinet is a kind of a Dido is right if it is chemotherapeutic.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stockinet is a Dido.; sent5 & sent12 -> int10: the fact that the stockinet does treat snowcap and is not a Ishtar is not correct.; sent2 & int10 -> int11: the stockinet squawks crinoid.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__