the fact that if the fact that the bandit does not browse Photostat and it is not geostrategic is wrong then the bellbird is resentful is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the bandit is not excusable hold if that it does not browse Photostat and is geostrategic is false. sent2: the background is not excusable. sent3: the fact that the bandit browses Photostat but it is not geostrategic is not correct. sent4: the bellbird is excusable and it is a adsorbate. sent5: that the background is unresentful but not excusable if the bandit is not excusable is right. sent6: the damask is excusable. sent7: if that the bandit does not browse Photostat and is not geostrategic is not true then it is not excusable. sent8: if the background is not resentful then the bellbird is both resentful and a adsorbate. sent9: that if the bandit is not excusable then the background is not excusable is correct. sent10: the fact that the bellbird circularizes and is effective is false. sent11: if the bandit does not browse Photostat and is not geostrategic then the bellbird is resentful.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bandit does not browse Photostat and it is not geostrategic is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the bandit is not excusable hold.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the background is not resentful and it is not excusable.; int2 -> int3: the background is not resentful.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the bellbird is resentful and a adsorbate.; int4 -> int5: the bellbird is resentful.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the technical is a adsorbate is not wrong.
sent10 -> int6: there exists something such that that it circularizes and is effective does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fact that the bandit does not browse Photostat and it is not geostrategic is wrong then the bellbird is resentful is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bandit is not excusable hold if that it does not browse Photostat and is geostrategic is false. sent2: the background is not excusable. sent3: the fact that the bandit browses Photostat but it is not geostrategic is not correct. sent4: the bellbird is excusable and it is a adsorbate. sent5: that the background is unresentful but not excusable if the bandit is not excusable is right. sent6: the damask is excusable. sent7: if that the bandit does not browse Photostat and is not geostrategic is not true then it is not excusable. sent8: if the background is not resentful then the bellbird is both resentful and a adsorbate. sent9: that if the bandit is not excusable then the background is not excusable is correct. sent10: the fact that the bellbird circularizes and is effective is false. sent11: if the bandit does not browse Photostat and is not geostrategic then the bellbird is resentful. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bandit does not browse Photostat and it is not geostrategic is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the bandit is not excusable hold.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the background is not resentful and it is not excusable.; int2 -> int3: the background is not resentful.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the bellbird is resentful and a adsorbate.; int4 -> int5: the bellbird is resentful.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__