the fact that the narrowness occurs is right.
sent1: if that the oration but not the unfurling occurs is incorrect then the fact that the juicelessness occurs does not hold. sent2: the narrowing does not occur if the wrestling zing occurs and the calibration does not occur. sent3: if that the randomization but not the halo occurs does not hold then the randomization does not occur. sent4: if the fumble does not occur that the randomization happens but the halo does not occur is not right. sent5: the narrowing happens if the wages does not occur and the randomization does not occur. sent6: that the wrestling zing occurs is prevented by either the stinting Paeonia or that the stinting staged does not occur or both. sent7: that the wrestling zing does not occur triggers that the procedure happens. sent8: if that both the wrestling zing and the calibration happens does not hold then the existentialness does not occur. sent9: the stinting Paeonia occurs and/or the stinting staged does not occur if the calibration does not occur. sent10: if the juicelessness does not occur the fact that the halo but not the fumble happens is true. sent11: the non-narrowness is brought about by that the halo happens but the fumble does not occur. sent12: the fumble does not occur. sent13: if the procedure occurs the wages does not occur. sent14: the wrestling father does not occur. sent15: the calibration does not occur.
sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the stinting Paeonia occurs and/or the stinting staged does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the wrestling zing does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the procedure occurs is correct.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the wages does not occur is true.; sent4 & sent12 -> int5: that the randomization but not the halo occurs is incorrect.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the randomization does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the wages does not occur and the randomization does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the narrowness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the narrowness occurs is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the oration but not the unfurling occurs is incorrect then the fact that the juicelessness occurs does not hold. sent2: the narrowing does not occur if the wrestling zing occurs and the calibration does not occur. sent3: if that the randomization but not the halo occurs does not hold then the randomization does not occur. sent4: if the fumble does not occur that the randomization happens but the halo does not occur is not right. sent5: the narrowing happens if the wages does not occur and the randomization does not occur. sent6: that the wrestling zing occurs is prevented by either the stinting Paeonia or that the stinting staged does not occur or both. sent7: that the wrestling zing does not occur triggers that the procedure happens. sent8: if that both the wrestling zing and the calibration happens does not hold then the existentialness does not occur. sent9: the stinting Paeonia occurs and/or the stinting staged does not occur if the calibration does not occur. sent10: if the juicelessness does not occur the fact that the halo but not the fumble happens is true. sent11: the non-narrowness is brought about by that the halo happens but the fumble does not occur. sent12: the fumble does not occur. sent13: if the procedure occurs the wages does not occur. sent14: the wrestling father does not occur. sent15: the calibration does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the stinting Paeonia occurs and/or the stinting staged does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the wrestling zing does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the procedure occurs is correct.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the wages does not occur is true.; sent4 & sent12 -> int5: that the randomization but not the halo occurs is incorrect.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the randomization does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the wages does not occur and the randomization does not occur.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__