the logomach is a nonexistence and/or is a kind of a neoclassicist.
sent1: that the capercaillie is not an external but it is catechismal is not right if the fact that something does not follow hold. sent2: if the defloration does follow then the paperboy does follow. sent3: something is not cathectic and it is not a kind of a remit. sent4: if the capercaillie is provocative the fact that it is holy hold. sent5: the fact that the Einstein is both a Cricetidae and holy is not right if it is not provocative. sent6: something that does follow is not unprovocative. sent7: if there are Taiwanese things then the paperboy is not a nonexistence. sent8: if the paperboy is provocative the capercaillie is provocative. sent9: the logomach is a kind of a nonexistence that is a Cricetidae if the paperboy is not a nonexistence. sent10: the pikeblenny is a Slav if the paperboy is a nonexistence. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is non-Taiwanese and it is non-Liverpudlian is not right the paperboy is not a kind of a nonexistence. sent12: there is something such that it does not follow. sent13: the fact that the fact that the logomach is not a kind of a nonexistence but it is neoclassicist hold is wrong if the defloration is not a Cricetidae. sent14: the fact that the capercaillie is not catechismal hold. sent15: if the Einstein is a kind of a Jonesboro the defloration does follow. sent16: if that the capercaillie is not a kind of an external but it is catechismal is false then the pikeblenny is a kind of an external. sent17: if something is not catechismal that it is a nonexistence or it is a neoclassicist or both does not hold.
the pikeblenny is an external and is a Slav.
sent12 & sent1 -> int1: that the capercaillie is not an external but it is catechismal is not right.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the pikeblenny is a kind of an external.;
$hypothesis$ = the logomach is a nonexistence and/or is a kind of a neoclassicist. ; $context$ = sent1: that the capercaillie is not an external but it is catechismal is not right if the fact that something does not follow hold. sent2: if the defloration does follow then the paperboy does follow. sent3: something is not cathectic and it is not a kind of a remit. sent4: if the capercaillie is provocative the fact that it is holy hold. sent5: the fact that the Einstein is both a Cricetidae and holy is not right if it is not provocative. sent6: something that does follow is not unprovocative. sent7: if there are Taiwanese things then the paperboy is not a nonexistence. sent8: if the paperboy is provocative the capercaillie is provocative. sent9: the logomach is a kind of a nonexistence that is a Cricetidae if the paperboy is not a nonexistence. sent10: the pikeblenny is a Slav if the paperboy is a nonexistence. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is non-Taiwanese and it is non-Liverpudlian is not right the paperboy is not a kind of a nonexistence. sent12: there is something such that it does not follow. sent13: the fact that the fact that the logomach is not a kind of a nonexistence but it is neoclassicist hold is wrong if the defloration is not a Cricetidae. sent14: the fact that the capercaillie is not catechismal hold. sent15: if the Einstein is a kind of a Jonesboro the defloration does follow. sent16: if that the capercaillie is not a kind of an external but it is catechismal is false then the pikeblenny is a kind of an external. sent17: if something is not catechismal that it is a nonexistence or it is a neoclassicist or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__