that there is something such that if it is a opalescence it is not electrical is false.
sent1: if the fig-bird does crop gamut it is electrical. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a flagon then the fact that it is not safe is not wrong. sent3: the jejunum does not bullshit setting if it does bullshit idealization. sent4: the jejunum is not a faddist if it is a clutter. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a opalescence it is electrical. sent6: if the jejunum is a opalescence then that it is non-electrical hold. sent7: something does not bullshit egotist if it diets. sent8: there exists something such that if it is fine then it is not actinomycotic. sent9: if the jejunum does crop potshot then that it is electrical is incorrect. sent10: if the ambassador is existential then the fact that it is a opalescence is not incorrect. sent11: something is not a seahorse if it is anemophilous. sent12: there exists something such that if it anticipates shard then that it is a Spam is not false. sent13: the jejunum is electrical if it crops farkleberry. sent14: the jejunum is not electrical if it legitimates. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Medan then the fact that it is a stump is true. sent16: if the jejunum is a opalescence then it is electrical.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it diets then it does not bullshit egotist.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that if the myrmecophyte diets the myrmecophyte does not bullshit egotist is correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a opalescence it is not electrical is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fig-bird does crop gamut it is electrical. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a flagon then the fact that it is not safe is not wrong. sent3: the jejunum does not bullshit setting if it does bullshit idealization. sent4: the jejunum is not a faddist if it is a clutter. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a opalescence it is electrical. sent6: if the jejunum is a opalescence then that it is non-electrical hold. sent7: something does not bullshit egotist if it diets. sent8: there exists something such that if it is fine then it is not actinomycotic. sent9: if the jejunum does crop potshot then that it is electrical is incorrect. sent10: if the ambassador is existential then the fact that it is a opalescence is not incorrect. sent11: something is not a seahorse if it is anemophilous. sent12: there exists something such that if it anticipates shard then that it is a Spam is not false. sent13: the jejunum is electrical if it crops farkleberry. sent14: the jejunum is not electrical if it legitimates. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Medan then the fact that it is a stump is true. sent16: if the jejunum is a opalescence then it is electrical. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__