the beneficiary interpolates bimetallism.
sent1: if the fact that the shirt does not look gemsbok and is not unsatisfactory is not right then it is a kind of a stickler. sent2: the beneficiary looks gemsbok if the fact that it does not interpolate bimetallism and it is not a kind of a stickler is not true. sent3: if the beneficiary interpolates bimetallism the fact that the shirt does not look gemsbok but it is unsatisfactory is not correct. sent4: that the shirt does not interpolate untouchable and does not discriminate is incorrect. sent5: the Acadian does not interpolate slowdown. sent6: the shirt is not a stickler. sent7: if the beneficiary interpolates bimetallism that the shirt does not look gemsbok and it is satisfactory is not true. sent8: the Acadian is an indicator. sent9: the shirt does not interpolate bimetallism. sent10: something is not a stickler if it does not interpolate slowdown and it is a kind of a left-hander. sent11: the beneficiary is unsatisfactory. sent12: the fact that the shirt does look gemsbok but it is not unsatisfactory is not right. sent13: if the beneficiary is a stickler then that the shirt does not look gemsbok and is not unsatisfactory is incorrect. sent14: that the shirt does not look gemsbok but it is unsatisfactory is not true. sent15: something interpolates bimetallism but it is not a stickler if it is a left-hander. sent16: if something is not an indicator then it is a kind of a left-hander and it does interpolate slowdown. sent17: the domatium is not membranous and is not confrontational. sent18: the fact that the shirt does look gemsbok but it is not unsatisfactory is wrong if the fact that the beneficiary does interpolate bimetallism hold. sent19: if the shirt interpolates bimetallism but it is not a stickler the beneficiary does interpolates bimetallism. sent20: the torero is a Brown if the domatium is not membranous and it is not confrontational. sent21: if the shirt is unsatisfactory then the fact that the beneficiary does not look gemsbok and does not interpolate bimetallism does not hold. sent22: the enzymologist does not look gemsbok. sent23: if something is a Brown the fact that it is both not a caulk and coeliac is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beneficiary interpolates bimetallism.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the shirt does not look gemsbok and it is not unsatisfactory is wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the shirt is a stickler.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Acadian is satisfactory.
sent10 -> int4: the Acadian is not a stickler if it does not interpolate slowdown and is a left-hander.;
$hypothesis$ = the beneficiary interpolates bimetallism. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the shirt does not look gemsbok and is not unsatisfactory is not right then it is a kind of a stickler. sent2: the beneficiary looks gemsbok if the fact that it does not interpolate bimetallism and it is not a kind of a stickler is not true. sent3: if the beneficiary interpolates bimetallism the fact that the shirt does not look gemsbok but it is unsatisfactory is not correct. sent4: that the shirt does not interpolate untouchable and does not discriminate is incorrect. sent5: the Acadian does not interpolate slowdown. sent6: the shirt is not a stickler. sent7: if the beneficiary interpolates bimetallism that the shirt does not look gemsbok and it is satisfactory is not true. sent8: the Acadian is an indicator. sent9: the shirt does not interpolate bimetallism. sent10: something is not a stickler if it does not interpolate slowdown and it is a kind of a left-hander. sent11: the beneficiary is unsatisfactory. sent12: the fact that the shirt does look gemsbok but it is not unsatisfactory is not right. sent13: if the beneficiary is a stickler then that the shirt does not look gemsbok and is not unsatisfactory is incorrect. sent14: that the shirt does not look gemsbok but it is unsatisfactory is not true. sent15: something interpolates bimetallism but it is not a stickler if it is a left-hander. sent16: if something is not an indicator then it is a kind of a left-hander and it does interpolate slowdown. sent17: the domatium is not membranous and is not confrontational. sent18: the fact that the shirt does look gemsbok but it is not unsatisfactory is wrong if the fact that the beneficiary does interpolate bimetallism hold. sent19: if the shirt interpolates bimetallism but it is not a stickler the beneficiary does interpolates bimetallism. sent20: the torero is a Brown if the domatium is not membranous and it is not confrontational. sent21: if the shirt is unsatisfactory then the fact that the beneficiary does not look gemsbok and does not interpolate bimetallism does not hold. sent22: the enzymologist does not look gemsbok. sent23: if something is a Brown the fact that it is both not a caulk and coeliac is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the beneficiary interpolates bimetallism.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the shirt does not look gemsbok and it is not unsatisfactory is wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the shirt is a stickler.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__