the acetaldehyde is a kind of a backbeat and it is a cigarfish.
sent1: that the Pollack is non-apocrine and/or it is not a cigarfish is not right if that it is a kind of a sima is not incorrect. sent2: something is outward and it does clock Eliot if it is not a sima. sent3: there is something such that that it is apocrine and it is not a cigarfish is false. sent4: something is not apocrine and it is not a cigarfish. sent5: if there is something such that that it is apocrine thing that is not a samisen is wrong the placenta is not apocrine. sent6: that the penologist is not absolutist but longitudinal does not hold. sent7: the acetaldehyde is a backbeat if the fact that the copywriter is not a sima or is not outward or both does not hold. sent8: the placenta clocks Eliot and it does defray Durio. sent9: the acetaldehyde is not a kind of a Ecuadorian if the copywriter does not clock Eliot and is non-outward. sent10: the fact that the Pollack is apocrine but it is not a cigarfish is not true. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is a Chechen and it is not a kind of a hotchpotch does not hold. sent12: the otoganglion is not longitudinal if the fact that the penologist is not an absolutist and is longitudinal is not correct. sent13: the copywriter is outward. sent14: that the Pollack is not apocrine and it is not a kind of a cigarfish is wrong. sent15: that the Pollack is apocrine but it is not a samisen is wrong if the otoganglion is not longitudinal. sent16: the acetaldehyde is a cigarfish if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-apocrine thing that is not a kind of a cigarfish is incorrect. sent17: if something is not Ecuadorian then the fact that it is a backbeat that is a kind of a cigarfish does not hold. sent18: the placenta defrays Durio. sent19: if something is not apocrine then either it does defray Durio or it is not a sorbate or both. sent20: the copywriter does clock Eliot and does nuke. sent21: if the fact that something is Ecuadorian hold that it is not a sima or not outward or both is not right. sent22: there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-apocrine thing that is a cigarfish is wrong. sent23: if the fact that the Pollack is not outward or is not a cigarfish or both is wrong the copywriter is apocrine. sent24: the fact that the placenta does not clock Eliot is not wrong if the copywriter is not a kind of a Ecuadorian. sent25: that the placenta does defray Durio and is a kind of a backbeat is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copywriter is not a Ecuadorian.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the placenta does not clock Eliot.; sent8 -> int2: the placenta does clock Eliot.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the copywriter is a kind of a Ecuadorian.; sent21 -> int5: if the copywriter is a kind of a Ecuadorian then that either it is not a sima or it is non-outward or both is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the copywriter is not a sima and/or is not outward is incorrect.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the acetaldehyde is a backbeat.; sent14 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not apocrine and it is not a cigarfish is not correct.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the acetaldehyde is a kind of a cigarfish.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the acetaldehyde is a backbeat and it is a cigarfish is false.
sent17 -> int10: that that the acetaldehyde is both a backbeat and the cigarfish is not correct if the acetaldehyde is not a kind of a Ecuadorian is not false.; sent19 -> int11: the placenta does defray Durio and/or is not a kind of a sorbate if it is not apocrine.; sent12 & sent6 -> int12: the otoganglion is not longitudinal.; sent15 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the Pollack is both apocrine and not a samisen is not correct.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that that it is apocrine and it is not a kind of a samisen is not true.; int14 & sent5 -> int15: the placenta is not apocrine.; int11 & int15 -> int16: either the placenta defrays Durio or it is not a sorbate or both.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it defrays Durio and/or it is not a sorbate.;
$hypothesis$ = the acetaldehyde is a kind of a backbeat and it is a cigarfish. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Pollack is non-apocrine and/or it is not a cigarfish is not right if that it is a kind of a sima is not incorrect. sent2: something is outward and it does clock Eliot if it is not a sima. sent3: there is something such that that it is apocrine and it is not a cigarfish is false. sent4: something is not apocrine and it is not a cigarfish. sent5: if there is something such that that it is apocrine thing that is not a samisen is wrong the placenta is not apocrine. sent6: that the penologist is not absolutist but longitudinal does not hold. sent7: the acetaldehyde is a backbeat if the fact that the copywriter is not a sima or is not outward or both does not hold. sent8: the placenta clocks Eliot and it does defray Durio. sent9: the acetaldehyde is not a kind of a Ecuadorian if the copywriter does not clock Eliot and is non-outward. sent10: the fact that the Pollack is apocrine but it is not a cigarfish is not true. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is a Chechen and it is not a kind of a hotchpotch does not hold. sent12: the otoganglion is not longitudinal if the fact that the penologist is not an absolutist and is longitudinal is not correct. sent13: the copywriter is outward. sent14: that the Pollack is not apocrine and it is not a kind of a cigarfish is wrong. sent15: that the Pollack is apocrine but it is not a samisen is wrong if the otoganglion is not longitudinal. sent16: the acetaldehyde is a cigarfish if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-apocrine thing that is not a kind of a cigarfish is incorrect. sent17: if something is not Ecuadorian then the fact that it is a backbeat that is a kind of a cigarfish does not hold. sent18: the placenta defrays Durio. sent19: if something is not apocrine then either it does defray Durio or it is not a sorbate or both. sent20: the copywriter does clock Eliot and does nuke. sent21: if the fact that something is Ecuadorian hold that it is not a sima or not outward or both is not right. sent22: there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-apocrine thing that is a cigarfish is wrong. sent23: if the fact that the Pollack is not outward or is not a cigarfish or both is wrong the copywriter is apocrine. sent24: the fact that the placenta does not clock Eliot is not wrong if the copywriter is not a kind of a Ecuadorian. sent25: that the placenta does defray Durio and is a kind of a backbeat is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copywriter is not a Ecuadorian.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the placenta does not clock Eliot.; sent8 -> int2: the placenta does clock Eliot.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the copywriter is a kind of a Ecuadorian.; sent21 -> int5: if the copywriter is a kind of a Ecuadorian then that either it is not a sima or it is non-outward or both is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the copywriter is not a sima and/or is not outward is incorrect.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the acetaldehyde is a backbeat.; sent14 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not apocrine and it is not a cigarfish is not correct.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the acetaldehyde is a kind of a cigarfish.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__