there exists something such that if it is not unneurotic then it is either not cacodemonic or not bisectional or both.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a corridor either it does not urticate Farmington or it is not a nightshade or both. sent2: if something is not cacodemonic then it does not emend organ and/or it is not a biotin. sent3: the silicon is low-interest and/or it is not bisectional if it does not jar Opisthocomidae. sent4: there is something such that if it is not unneurotic it is not non-cacodemonic and/or is not bisectional. sent5: if the Chianti is not unneurotic then it is not cacodemonic and/or it is not bisectional.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the Chianti does not emend organ or it is not a biotin or both if the fact that it is not cacodemonic is not incorrect.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not unneurotic then it is either not cacodemonic or not bisectional or both. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a corridor either it does not urticate Farmington or it is not a nightshade or both. sent2: if something is not cacodemonic then it does not emend organ and/or it is not a biotin. sent3: the silicon is low-interest and/or it is not bisectional if it does not jar Opisthocomidae. sent4: there is something such that if it is not unneurotic it is not non-cacodemonic and/or is not bisectional. sent5: if the Chianti is not unneurotic then it is not cacodemonic and/or it is not bisectional. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__