that the permitting frequentative is prevented by the parentalness does not hold.
sent1: that the unfairness and the booting Tucson happens triggers that the amputation does not occur. sent2: the permitting tumble happens. sent3: the Dionysianness occurs if the recusing occurs. sent4: the fact that the recusing occurs hold if the non-sarcolemmalness and the stigmatizing oology happens. sent5: that both the non-sarcolemmalness and the stigmatizing oology happens is not incorrect. sent6: if the Dionysianness occurs and the parentalness happens then the permitting frequentative does not occur.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the recusing happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the Dionysianness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the parentalness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the Dionysianness and the parentalness occurs.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the permitting frequentative does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the permitting frequentative is prevented by the parentalness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the unfairness and the booting Tucson happens triggers that the amputation does not occur. sent2: the permitting tumble happens. sent3: the Dionysianness occurs if the recusing occurs. sent4: the fact that the recusing occurs hold if the non-sarcolemmalness and the stigmatizing oology happens. sent5: that both the non-sarcolemmalness and the stigmatizing oology happens is not incorrect. sent6: if the Dionysianness occurs and the parentalness happens then the permitting frequentative does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the recusing happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the Dionysianness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the parentalness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the Dionysianness and the parentalness occurs.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the permitting frequentative does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__