the cheliceralness occurs and the hike happens.
sent1: that the geodeticness does not occur and the reissuing cytomegalovirus does not occur is not true if the reacting occurs. sent2: the sending rapier does not occur if the jam occurs. sent3: the circumscription happens and the names happens. sent4: that both the nosocomialness and the jam happens is caused by that the reissuing Kachin does not occur. sent5: the fact that the reissuing Kachin does not occur is not wrong if that the geodeticness does not occur and the reissuing cytomegalovirus does not occur is not right. sent6: that the skirl and the non-cheliceralness occurs does not hold. sent7: if the circumscription occurs then the skirling occurs. sent8: both the naming and the skirling happens if the sending rapier does not occur. sent9: the fact that the cheliceralness and the hike occurs does not hold if the circumscription does not occur. sent10: the fact that the hike happens is correct.
sent3 -> int1: the circumscription occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the skirling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cheliceralness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the skirl and the non-cheliceralness happens.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cheliceralness happens.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cheliceralness and the hike occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the cheliceralness occurs and the hike happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the geodeticness does not occur and the reissuing cytomegalovirus does not occur is not true if the reacting occurs. sent2: the sending rapier does not occur if the jam occurs. sent3: the circumscription happens and the names happens. sent4: that both the nosocomialness and the jam happens is caused by that the reissuing Kachin does not occur. sent5: the fact that the reissuing Kachin does not occur is not wrong if that the geodeticness does not occur and the reissuing cytomegalovirus does not occur is not right. sent6: that the skirl and the non-cheliceralness occurs does not hold. sent7: if the circumscription occurs then the skirling occurs. sent8: both the naming and the skirling happens if the sending rapier does not occur. sent9: the fact that the cheliceralness and the hike occurs does not hold if the circumscription does not occur. sent10: the fact that the hike happens is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the circumscription occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the skirling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cheliceralness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the skirl and the non-cheliceralness happens.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cheliceralness happens.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__