the robalo does not persist obtrusiveness.
sent1: if the usherette does not lose inhalant it is not ineligible and is not a Atherinidae. sent2: the footplate is operationalist. sent3: if the footplate is a Drosophyllum and is not a kind of a Coptic then it is not dactylic. sent4: that if the usherette is not ineligible and not a Atherinidae the checkout is not dactylic is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the globeflower is not a raven and it is not dactylic is not correct. sent6: if the footplate is dactylic and/or it is not a precession it is dactylic. sent7: the checkout is not operationalist but a precession if it does persist amitriptyline. sent8: the footplate is a kind of a Drosophyllum if the fact that it does write is right. sent9: something that is operationalist is dactylic or not a precession or both. sent10: if something is a kind of non-myocardial thing that is not positional the footplate writes. sent11: the usherette does not lose inhalant. sent12: if there is something such that that it does not persist Tanacetum and it does not persist usherette is not true the merlon is not a pulp. sent13: the footplate is not a Coptic. sent14: if something that is a Coptic is not dactylic then the footplate is not a Drosophyllum. sent15: the robalo is not dactylic and it does not write if the checkout does not persist obtrusiveness. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it does not write and is not positional does not hold. sent17: the checkout does persist amitriptyline. sent18: the fact that the robalo is not a kind of a Coptic is true. sent19: the fact that the checkout does not persist obtrusiveness is not false. sent20: the robalo does not prioritize bourn. sent21: the footplate is not limbic and it does not persist agribusiness. sent22: if there is something such that that it is not myocardial and is not positional is not correct then the robalo does not persist obtrusiveness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gouger is a kind of non-myocardial thing that is not positional.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not myocardial and it is not positional.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the footplate does write.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the footplate is a kind of a Drosophyllum.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the footplate is a kind of a Drosophyllum but it is non-Coptic.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the footplate is not dactylic.; sent9 -> int6: the footplate is dactylic and/or is not a precession if it is operationalist.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: either the footplate is dactylic or it is not a precession or both.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the footplate is dactylic.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the gouger is non-myocardial thing that is not positional does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is both non-myocardial and non-positional is not correct.; int11 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the robalo does persist obtrusiveness.
sent7 & sent17 -> int12: the checkout is non-operationalist a precession.; sent1 & sent11 -> int13: the usherette is not ineligible and it is not a Atherinidae.; sent4 & int13 -> int14: the checkout is non-dactylic.;
$hypothesis$ = the robalo does not persist obtrusiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the usherette does not lose inhalant it is not ineligible and is not a Atherinidae. sent2: the footplate is operationalist. sent3: if the footplate is a Drosophyllum and is not a kind of a Coptic then it is not dactylic. sent4: that if the usherette is not ineligible and not a Atherinidae the checkout is not dactylic is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the globeflower is not a raven and it is not dactylic is not correct. sent6: if the footplate is dactylic and/or it is not a precession it is dactylic. sent7: the checkout is not operationalist but a precession if it does persist amitriptyline. sent8: the footplate is a kind of a Drosophyllum if the fact that it does write is right. sent9: something that is operationalist is dactylic or not a precession or both. sent10: if something is a kind of non-myocardial thing that is not positional the footplate writes. sent11: the usherette does not lose inhalant. sent12: if there is something such that that it does not persist Tanacetum and it does not persist usherette is not true the merlon is not a pulp. sent13: the footplate is not a Coptic. sent14: if something that is a Coptic is not dactylic then the footplate is not a Drosophyllum. sent15: the robalo is not dactylic and it does not write if the checkout does not persist obtrusiveness. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it does not write and is not positional does not hold. sent17: the checkout does persist amitriptyline. sent18: the fact that the robalo is not a kind of a Coptic is true. sent19: the fact that the checkout does not persist obtrusiveness is not false. sent20: the robalo does not prioritize bourn. sent21: the footplate is not limbic and it does not persist agribusiness. sent22: if there is something such that that it is not myocardial and is not positional is not correct then the robalo does not persist obtrusiveness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gouger is a kind of non-myocardial thing that is not positional.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is not myocardial and it is not positional.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the footplate does write.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the footplate is a kind of a Drosophyllum.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the footplate is a kind of a Drosophyllum but it is non-Coptic.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the footplate is not dactylic.; sent9 -> int6: the footplate is dactylic and/or is not a precession if it is operationalist.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: either the footplate is dactylic or it is not a precession or both.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the footplate is dactylic.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the gouger is non-myocardial thing that is not positional does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is both non-myocardial and non-positional is not correct.; int11 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__