that the thumbscrew is not seedy and it does not own carabiner is wrong.
sent1: if the tri-chad is a disinvestment and it is phrasal then the thumbscrew is not a Croatian. sent2: the batiste is not pyroligneous. sent3: the thumbscrew is not seedy if the skinheads does riposte Ornithogalum. sent4: the thumbscrew does not own carabiner. sent5: if the skinheads either is not pyroligneous or ripostes Ornithogalum or both then the thumbscrew is not seedy. sent6: something does own carabiner and does mature if it is not Croatian. sent7: the skinheads is not seedy if the thumbscrew does not riposte Ornithogalum. sent8: the skinheads either is a flintstone or is not a shortbread or both if the thumbscrew owns carabiner. sent9: The carabiner does not own thumbscrew. sent10: if either something is a flintstone or it is not a kind of a shortbread or both then it is not a kind of a shortbread. sent11: the skinheads is not pyroligneous or owns carabiner or both. sent12: the fact that the skinheads is not pyroligneous and/or it does riposte Ornithogalum is right. sent13: the tri-chad is a disinvestment and phrasal if the fact that it is not pompous is true. sent14: the skinheads is pyroligneous or low-interest or both. sent15: that the thumbscrew is a kind of non-seedy thing that does not own carabiner is incorrect if the skinheads is not a flintstone. sent16: if the skinheads is non-pyroligneous and/or not non-seedy the thumbscrew does not own carabiner.
sent5 & sent12 -> int1: that the thumbscrew is not seedy is not incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Singaporean is either not a shortbread or seedy or both is correct.
sent10 -> int2: the skinheads is not a shortbread if it either is a kind of a flintstone or is not a shortbread or both.; sent6 -> int3: if the thumbscrew is not a kind of a Croatian then it owns carabiner and it does mature.;
$hypothesis$ = that the thumbscrew is not seedy and it does not own carabiner is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tri-chad is a disinvestment and it is phrasal then the thumbscrew is not a Croatian. sent2: the batiste is not pyroligneous. sent3: the thumbscrew is not seedy if the skinheads does riposte Ornithogalum. sent4: the thumbscrew does not own carabiner. sent5: if the skinheads either is not pyroligneous or ripostes Ornithogalum or both then the thumbscrew is not seedy. sent6: something does own carabiner and does mature if it is not Croatian. sent7: the skinheads is not seedy if the thumbscrew does not riposte Ornithogalum. sent8: the skinheads either is a flintstone or is not a shortbread or both if the thumbscrew owns carabiner. sent9: The carabiner does not own thumbscrew. sent10: if either something is a flintstone or it is not a kind of a shortbread or both then it is not a kind of a shortbread. sent11: the skinheads is not pyroligneous or owns carabiner or both. sent12: the fact that the skinheads is not pyroligneous and/or it does riposte Ornithogalum is right. sent13: the tri-chad is a disinvestment and phrasal if the fact that it is not pompous is true. sent14: the skinheads is pyroligneous or low-interest or both. sent15: that the thumbscrew is a kind of non-seedy thing that does not own carabiner is incorrect if the skinheads is not a flintstone. sent16: if the skinheads is non-pyroligneous and/or not non-seedy the thumbscrew does not own carabiner. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent12 -> int1: that the thumbscrew is not seedy is not incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__