the snoop is unilateral.
sent1: if something is not a kamikaze then it does shepherd and it is unilateral. sent2: if there are non-unilateral things the snoop is not calcic. sent3: if something is not a collembolan it is not unilateral. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a shepherd then the fact that either the snoop is not a kamikaze or it is a kind of a Tutelo or both is not right. sent5: if the snoop is not a gladiator then that it is not a collembolan hold. sent6: something does not shepherd. sent7: there is something such that it is not a sou. sent8: if something is not a kind of a rammer it does not subrogate greenness. sent9: the snoop is not a Tutelo. sent10: if that something is not a kamikaze and/or it is a Tutelo is not true then it is not a kind of a collembolan. sent11: there is something such that it is not inconvertible. sent12: if the fact that the snoop is not nonparticulate and/or it is a bilberry is wrong it does not besot futurity. sent13: the ramus is not a convenience if it is not a kind of a collembolan.
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that either the snoop is not a kamikaze or it is a kind of a Tutelo or both is false.; sent10 -> int2: the snoop is not a collembolan if that it is not a kamikaze and/or it is a kind of a Tutelo is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snoop is not a collembolan.; sent3 -> int4: if the snoop is not a kind of a collembolan the fact that it is not unilateral is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the snoop is unilateral.
sent1 -> int5: if the snoop is not a kamikaze it is a shepherd and unilateral.;
$hypothesis$ = the snoop is unilateral. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kamikaze then it does shepherd and it is unilateral. sent2: if there are non-unilateral things the snoop is not calcic. sent3: if something is not a collembolan it is not unilateral. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a shepherd then the fact that either the snoop is not a kamikaze or it is a kind of a Tutelo or both is not right. sent5: if the snoop is not a gladiator then that it is not a collembolan hold. sent6: something does not shepherd. sent7: there is something such that it is not a sou. sent8: if something is not a kind of a rammer it does not subrogate greenness. sent9: the snoop is not a Tutelo. sent10: if that something is not a kamikaze and/or it is a Tutelo is not true then it is not a kind of a collembolan. sent11: there is something such that it is not inconvertible. sent12: if the fact that the snoop is not nonparticulate and/or it is a bilberry is wrong it does not besot futurity. sent13: the ramus is not a convenience if it is not a kind of a collembolan. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that either the snoop is not a kamikaze or it is a kind of a Tutelo or both is false.; sent10 -> int2: the snoop is not a collembolan if that it is not a kamikaze and/or it is a kind of a Tutelo is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the snoop is not a collembolan.; sent3 -> int4: if the snoop is not a kind of a collembolan the fact that it is not unilateral is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__