the overlap is not an imprudence.
sent1: if something does not interpolate indefiniteness and interpolates left-hander it is a kind of a Lagidium. sent2: the houseguest is a isochrone. sent3: if the Hutu does interpolate indefiniteness and it does interpolate left-hander then it is a Lagidium. sent4: everything is not piscine. sent5: if that something does not permit Garbo and is a planetesimal is incorrect then it permit Garbo. sent6: the Hutu is not piscine. sent7: if the Hutu is an imprudence that it interpolates left-hander and permits varicocele is wrong. sent8: that the Hutu does permit Garbo and it does permit varicocele is not right if the fact that it is a Lagidium hold. sent9: that the overlap is an imprudence is right if there exists something such that that it permits Garbo and it does not permit varicocele is not correct. sent10: if something is a kind of a Lagidium that it does permit Garbo and does not permit varicocele is false. sent11: if something does interpolate indefiniteness and it does interpolate left-hander it is a Lagidium. sent12: that something does not permit Garbo and is a planetesimal does not hold if it does not permit varicocele. sent13: if the Wheeler does not permit Rallidae then the houseguest is a dumper. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is ready and it is a porphyrin is wrong. sent15: the Wheeler does not permit Rallidae and/or it does not juggle. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not interpolate indefiniteness and interpolates left-hander does not hold then the Miss is piscine. sent17: the fact that the Hutu permits Garbo and it does permit varicocele is not true. sent18: the overlap is not a kind of an imprudence if that the Miss is a kind of an imprudence and is non-piscine is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Hutu does not interpolate indefiniteness but it does interpolate left-hander is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not interpolate indefiniteness and it does interpolate left-hander is not right.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the Miss is piscine.; sent4 -> int3: the Miss is not piscine.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Hutu does not interpolate indefiniteness and interpolates left-hander.; sent1 -> int6: the Hutu is a Lagidium if it does not interpolate indefiniteness and interpolates left-hander.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Hutu is a Lagidium.; sent10 -> int8: if the Hutu is a Lagidium that it permits Garbo and does not permit varicocele is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the Hutu does permit Garbo and does not permit varicocele does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it permits Garbo and it does not permit varicocele does not hold.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the overlap is not an imprudence.
sent5 -> int11: if the fact that the Miss does not permit Garbo and is a planetesimal is not true then it permit Garbo.; sent12 -> int12: the fact that the Miss does not permit Garbo and is a planetesimal is not true if it does not permit varicocele.;
$hypothesis$ = the overlap is not an imprudence. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not interpolate indefiniteness and interpolates left-hander it is a kind of a Lagidium. sent2: the houseguest is a isochrone. sent3: if the Hutu does interpolate indefiniteness and it does interpolate left-hander then it is a Lagidium. sent4: everything is not piscine. sent5: if that something does not permit Garbo and is a planetesimal is incorrect then it permit Garbo. sent6: the Hutu is not piscine. sent7: if the Hutu is an imprudence that it interpolates left-hander and permits varicocele is wrong. sent8: that the Hutu does permit Garbo and it does permit varicocele is not right if the fact that it is a Lagidium hold. sent9: that the overlap is an imprudence is right if there exists something such that that it permits Garbo and it does not permit varicocele is not correct. sent10: if something is a kind of a Lagidium that it does permit Garbo and does not permit varicocele is false. sent11: if something does interpolate indefiniteness and it does interpolate left-hander it is a Lagidium. sent12: that something does not permit Garbo and is a planetesimal does not hold if it does not permit varicocele. sent13: if the Wheeler does not permit Rallidae then the houseguest is a dumper. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is ready and it is a porphyrin is wrong. sent15: the Wheeler does not permit Rallidae and/or it does not juggle. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not interpolate indefiniteness and interpolates left-hander does not hold then the Miss is piscine. sent17: the fact that the Hutu permits Garbo and it does permit varicocele is not true. sent18: the overlap is not a kind of an imprudence if that the Miss is a kind of an imprudence and is non-piscine is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Hutu does not interpolate indefiniteness but it does interpolate left-hander is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does not interpolate indefiniteness and it does interpolate left-hander is not right.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the Miss is piscine.; sent4 -> int3: the Miss is not piscine.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Hutu does not interpolate indefiniteness and interpolates left-hander.; sent1 -> int6: the Hutu is a Lagidium if it does not interpolate indefiniteness and interpolates left-hander.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Hutu is a Lagidium.; sent10 -> int8: if the Hutu is a Lagidium that it permits Garbo and does not permit varicocele is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the Hutu does permit Garbo and does not permit varicocele does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it permits Garbo and it does not permit varicocele does not hold.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__