the bastion is not a respectability.
sent1: if there is something such that it is a Walton then the fact that the Oklahoman is a kind of a Fistulariidae but it is not a kind of a Protestant hold. sent2: if something is not a doxorubicin or is not a kind of a Tyler or both it is not a kind of a lactobacillus. sent3: the wrangler is not a Walton if the Powhatan is a kind of non-Protestant thing that is Pauline. sent4: if something is not a lactobacillus it is a kind of a respectability that does diphthongize. sent5: the axerophthol is not a doxorubicin and/or is not a Tyler if the wrangler is not Pauline. sent6: the bastion is not a respectability if the Oklahoman is a Fistulariidae but it is not Protestant. sent7: the bastion is not a lactobacillus if that the Oklahoman is a lactobacillus and it is a Fistulariidae is wrong. sent8: the Powhatan is not a kind of a Protestant but it is a kind of a saturation. sent9: if something is not a lactobacillus then it diphthongizes and is a kind of a Walton. sent10: the Powhatan is not non-Pauline and it is playable. sent11: the wrangler is not Pauline.
sent2 -> int1: the axerophthol is not a lactobacillus if it is not a doxorubicin and/or is not a Tyler.; sent5 & sent11 -> int2: the axerophthol is not a doxorubicin and/or it is not a Tyler.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the axerophthol is not a lactobacillus.; sent9 -> int4: if the axerophthol is not a lactobacillus the fact that it diphthongizes and it is a Walton is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the axerophthol diphthongizes and is a Walton.; int5 -> int6: the axerophthol is a Walton.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is a Walton is correct.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the Oklahoman is a Fistulariidae but it is non-Protestant.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the bastion is a kind of a respectability.
sent4 -> int9: if the bastion is not a lactobacillus it is a respectability and it diphthongizes.; sent8 -> int10: the Powhatan is not a kind of a Protestant.; sent10 -> int11: the fact that the Powhatan is Pauline is not wrong.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the Powhatan is not a kind of a Protestant but it is Pauline.; sent3 & int12 -> int13: the wrangler is not a Walton.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not a Walton.;
$hypothesis$ = the bastion is not a respectability. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is a Walton then the fact that the Oklahoman is a kind of a Fistulariidae but it is not a kind of a Protestant hold. sent2: if something is not a doxorubicin or is not a kind of a Tyler or both it is not a kind of a lactobacillus. sent3: the wrangler is not a Walton if the Powhatan is a kind of non-Protestant thing that is Pauline. sent4: if something is not a lactobacillus it is a kind of a respectability that does diphthongize. sent5: the axerophthol is not a doxorubicin and/or is not a Tyler if the wrangler is not Pauline. sent6: the bastion is not a respectability if the Oklahoman is a Fistulariidae but it is not Protestant. sent7: the bastion is not a lactobacillus if that the Oklahoman is a lactobacillus and it is a Fistulariidae is wrong. sent8: the Powhatan is not a kind of a Protestant but it is a kind of a saturation. sent9: if something is not a lactobacillus then it diphthongizes and is a kind of a Walton. sent10: the Powhatan is not non-Pauline and it is playable. sent11: the wrangler is not Pauline. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the axerophthol is not a lactobacillus if it is not a doxorubicin and/or is not a Tyler.; sent5 & sent11 -> int2: the axerophthol is not a doxorubicin and/or it is not a Tyler.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the axerophthol is not a lactobacillus.; sent9 -> int4: if the axerophthol is not a lactobacillus the fact that it diphthongizes and it is a Walton is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the axerophthol diphthongizes and is a Walton.; int5 -> int6: the axerophthol is a Walton.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is a Walton is correct.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the Oklahoman is a Fistulariidae but it is non-Protestant.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__