that either the sport does not claw hunger or it is credible or both is not right.
sent1: if that the Gypsy is an agar is not correct then that the teleost is not an agar is not false. sent2: the fact that either the sport does not claw hunger or it is credible or both is not correct if the garboard is Slovakian. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is non-siding and non-caloric is not correct the quern is non-caloric. sent4: if the snowflake is not a kind of an agar and is not a Geastrum the Gypsy is not a kind of an agar. sent5: the sport is unethical and/or it is a hill. sent6: the sport is non-Slovakian if there is something such that it is not subclinical. sent7: if there is something such that that it is a kind of imperishable thing that is subclinical is not right the fact that the sport is not Slovakian hold. sent8: if the Israeli does not clap sputter the fact that it is not siding and it is not caloric is not true. sent9: the snowflake is not a kind of an agar and it is not a Geastrum if something is a imbrication. sent10: if something is not unethical and/or it is a hill it does not claw hunger. sent11: the Israeli does not claw expulsion but it is a bunch. sent12: the sport is not credible if there is something such that the fact that it claws hunger and it is Slovakian is not true. sent13: the sport either is not a alienor or corrodes Paiwanic or both. sent14: there is something such that that it is both Slovakian and unethical is false. sent15: if the teleost is not an agar then the dendrite is not unethical and not universalistic. sent16: if something is caloric it is a imbrication. sent17: the sport does not claw hunger if it is not unethical. sent18: if something does not claw expulsion but it is a bunch then it does not clap sputter. sent19: there are imperishable and subclinical things. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is imperishable and it is subclinical is not right. sent21: the sport is either not unethical or a hill or both if it is not Slovakian. sent22: the sport is unethical and/or it hills if it is not Slovakian.
sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the sport is not Slovakian.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the sport is not unethical and/or it is a hill.; sent10 -> int3: the sport does not claw hunger if either it is not unethical or it does hill or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sport does not claw hunger.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sport does not claw hunger and/or is credible is not correct.
sent16 -> int5: if the quern is caloric then it is a kind of a imbrication.; sent18 -> int6: that the Israeli does not clap sputter if the Israeli does not claw expulsion and does bunch is right.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the Israeli does not clap sputter.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the fact that that the Israeli is not a kind of a siding and it is not caloric is not false is incorrect.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it does not side and it is not caloric does not hold.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: that the quern is caloric is not wrong.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the quern is a imbrication.; int11 -> int12: something is a kind of a imbrication.; int12 & sent9 -> int13: the snowflake is not a kind of an agar and it is not a Geastrum.; sent4 & int13 -> int14: the Gypsy is not an agar.; sent1 & int14 -> int15: the teleost is not an agar.; sent15 & int15 -> int16: the dendrite is not unethical and is not universalistic.; int16 -> int17: the dendrite is not unethical.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is ethical.;
$hypothesis$ = that either the sport does not claw hunger or it is credible or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Gypsy is an agar is not correct then that the teleost is not an agar is not false. sent2: the fact that either the sport does not claw hunger or it is credible or both is not correct if the garboard is Slovakian. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is non-siding and non-caloric is not correct the quern is non-caloric. sent4: if the snowflake is not a kind of an agar and is not a Geastrum the Gypsy is not a kind of an agar. sent5: the sport is unethical and/or it is a hill. sent6: the sport is non-Slovakian if there is something such that it is not subclinical. sent7: if there is something such that that it is a kind of imperishable thing that is subclinical is not right the fact that the sport is not Slovakian hold. sent8: if the Israeli does not clap sputter the fact that it is not siding and it is not caloric is not true. sent9: the snowflake is not a kind of an agar and it is not a Geastrum if something is a imbrication. sent10: if something is not unethical and/or it is a hill it does not claw hunger. sent11: the Israeli does not claw expulsion but it is a bunch. sent12: the sport is not credible if there is something such that the fact that it claws hunger and it is Slovakian is not true. sent13: the sport either is not a alienor or corrodes Paiwanic or both. sent14: there is something such that that it is both Slovakian and unethical is false. sent15: if the teleost is not an agar then the dendrite is not unethical and not universalistic. sent16: if something is caloric it is a imbrication. sent17: the sport does not claw hunger if it is not unethical. sent18: if something does not claw expulsion but it is a bunch then it does not clap sputter. sent19: there are imperishable and subclinical things. sent20: there is something such that the fact that it is imperishable and it is subclinical is not right. sent21: the sport is either not unethical or a hill or both if it is not Slovakian. sent22: the sport is unethical and/or it hills if it is not Slovakian. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the sport is not Slovakian.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the sport is not unethical and/or it is a hill.; sent10 -> int3: the sport does not claw hunger if either it is not unethical or it does hill or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sport does not claw hunger.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__