that the stew is bacteriostatic a rampage is not true.
sent1: if the feather is a commemoration then it is not basaltic. sent2: the fact that the escutcheon does not broadside escutcheon and is not archaistic does not hold. sent3: that the escutcheon does not collar bimillennium and it does not expire coloradillo is not correct. sent4: something is basaltic thing that is not a kind of a commemoration. sent5: if the feather is a commemoration then the fact that it either is not Rembrandtesque or is archaistic or both is wrong. sent6: the feather is bacteriostatic if the fact that the stew is basaltic is not wrong. sent7: the stew is not a kind of a Braun. sent8: if the fact that something does not collar bimillennium and it does not expire coloradillo does not hold it is not a kind of a used-car. sent9: the escutcheon is a commemoration if that the feather does not broadside escutcheon and it is not a kind of a Braun does not hold. sent10: the feather is not a kind of a rampage. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not a commemoration but intemperate is not right the feather is a kind of a commemoration. sent12: the sorrel is not a Braun and is not Rembrandtesque if the fact that it does not expire coloradillo is true. sent13: the feather broadsides escutcheon if the fact that the escutcheon does not expire coloradillo is wrong. sent14: if the escutcheon is a kind of a Braun then the baldpate is a used-car. sent15: if there exists something such that that either it does not expire coloradillo or it is basaltic or both is not right the stew rampages. sent16: there is something such that it either is not a rampage or is a used-car or both. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it is not a commemoration and it is intemperate is incorrect. sent18: if the feather is a commemoration then that it either does not expire coloradillo or is basaltic or both is wrong. sent19: the fact that the sorrel is a kind of non-Rembrandtesque thing that does not collar bimillennium does not hold if the inside is non-Rembrandtesque. sent20: the baldpate is not Rembrandtesque. sent21: the escutcheon does not broadside escutcheon and is not archaistic if it is not a Braun. sent22: that the inside is not Rembrandtesque and it does not broadside escutcheon is not right. sent23: if the fact that the fact that the sorrel is a kind of non-Rembrandtesque thing that does not collar bimillennium is true is not true then the stew is bacteriostatic. sent24: the fact that the baldpate does expire coloradillo and is not a used-car is not true. sent25: the inside is a used-car. sent26: the escutcheon is bacteriostatic if the stew does broadside escutcheon. sent27: if the baldpate is a used-car the inside is Rembrandtesque.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the escutcheon is not a Braun.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the escutcheon does not broadside escutcheon and is not archaistic.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the escutcheon is a Braun.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the baldpate is a used-car.; int4 & sent27 -> int5: the inside is Rembrandtesque.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: that the sorrel is not Rembrandtesque and does not collar bimillennium is wrong.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: the stew is bacteriostatic.; sent17 & sent11 -> int8: the feather is a commemoration.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the feather does not expire coloradillo and/or it is basaltic does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it either does not expire coloradillo or is basaltic or both is not right.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the stew does rampage.; int7 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the stew is bacteriostatic thing that rampages is wrong.
sent8 -> int12: if that the escutcheon does not collar bimillennium and it does not expire coloradillo is wrong then it is not a used-car.; int12 & sent3 -> int13: the escutcheon is not a used-car.;
$hypothesis$ = that the stew is bacteriostatic a rampage is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the feather is a commemoration then it is not basaltic. sent2: the fact that the escutcheon does not broadside escutcheon and is not archaistic does not hold. sent3: that the escutcheon does not collar bimillennium and it does not expire coloradillo is not correct. sent4: something is basaltic thing that is not a kind of a commemoration. sent5: if the feather is a commemoration then the fact that it either is not Rembrandtesque or is archaistic or both is wrong. sent6: the feather is bacteriostatic if the fact that the stew is basaltic is not wrong. sent7: the stew is not a kind of a Braun. sent8: if the fact that something does not collar bimillennium and it does not expire coloradillo does not hold it is not a kind of a used-car. sent9: the escutcheon is a commemoration if that the feather does not broadside escutcheon and it is not a kind of a Braun does not hold. sent10: the feather is not a kind of a rampage. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not a commemoration but intemperate is not right the feather is a kind of a commemoration. sent12: the sorrel is not a Braun and is not Rembrandtesque if the fact that it does not expire coloradillo is true. sent13: the feather broadsides escutcheon if the fact that the escutcheon does not expire coloradillo is wrong. sent14: if the escutcheon is a kind of a Braun then the baldpate is a used-car. sent15: if there exists something such that that either it does not expire coloradillo or it is basaltic or both is not right the stew rampages. sent16: there is something such that it either is not a rampage or is a used-car or both. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it is not a commemoration and it is intemperate is incorrect. sent18: if the feather is a commemoration then that it either does not expire coloradillo or is basaltic or both is wrong. sent19: the fact that the sorrel is a kind of non-Rembrandtesque thing that does not collar bimillennium does not hold if the inside is non-Rembrandtesque. sent20: the baldpate is not Rembrandtesque. sent21: the escutcheon does not broadside escutcheon and is not archaistic if it is not a Braun. sent22: that the inside is not Rembrandtesque and it does not broadside escutcheon is not right. sent23: if the fact that the fact that the sorrel is a kind of non-Rembrandtesque thing that does not collar bimillennium is true is not true then the stew is bacteriostatic. sent24: the fact that the baldpate does expire coloradillo and is not a used-car is not true. sent25: the inside is a used-car. sent26: the escutcheon is bacteriostatic if the stew does broadside escutcheon. sent27: if the baldpate is a used-car the inside is Rembrandtesque. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the escutcheon is not a Braun.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the escutcheon does not broadside escutcheon and is not archaistic.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the escutcheon is a Braun.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the baldpate is a used-car.; int4 & sent27 -> int5: the inside is Rembrandtesque.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: that the sorrel is not Rembrandtesque and does not collar bimillennium is wrong.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: the stew is bacteriostatic.; sent17 & sent11 -> int8: the feather is a commemoration.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the feather does not expire coloradillo and/or it is basaltic does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it either does not expire coloradillo or is basaltic or both is not right.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the stew does rampage.; int7 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__