that there is something such that if it is not algorithmic and not mythic it does outstare suitor does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a reality and is not finite then it does protrude. sent2: if the postmodernism is not algorithmic and it is not mythic then it does outstare suitor. sent3: that the cardsharp outstares suitor is not wrong if it does not restrain jackknife and is not a ways. sent4: the postmodernism outstares suitor if it is algorithmic thing that is not mythic. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a modifier and not a censor then that it is a kind of a Herman is true. sent6: there is something such that if it does not surmise abominator and is not a kind of a cuckoo-bumblebee then that it does outstare postmodernism is true. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not algorithmic and it is mythic it does outstare suitor. sent8: the postmodernism is discriminatory if it does not outstare suitor and does not grate. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not outstare Priestley and it does not surmise aspiration it is a monoplane. sent10: there is something such that if it is not critical and is not Kiplingesque then it is Congregational. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a pegboard and is not a jackpot it is a heterosexism. sent12: there exists something such that if it is algorithmic and it is non-mythic it does outstare suitor. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both not a Cezanne and not footless it is dark. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not undo and is not a kind of a pomegranate then it is a peanuts. sent15: if the postmodernism is both not algorithmic and mythic then it does outstare suitor. sent16: if the postmodernism is not a kind of a paintbrush and it is not a kind of a conviction then that it is a kind of a heterosexism is correct. sent17: the postmodernism is a kind of a Carew if it is not mythic and is not a kind of a lotto. sent18: if something that does not impeach is not a miasma it does cobble. sent19: the ergotamine is grassless if it is not algorithmic and it is not a kind of a Lycopersicon. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a pepsin and it is not nonthermal then it is hydrodynamic. sent21: the postmodernism sews if it is not a slanginess and it does not outstare suitor.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not impeach and is not a miasma then it is a kind of a cobble.
sent18 -> int1: if the Afro-wig does not impeach and it is not a kind of a miasma then it does cobble.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not algorithmic and not mythic it does outstare suitor does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a reality and is not finite then it does protrude. sent2: if the postmodernism is not algorithmic and it is not mythic then it does outstare suitor. sent3: that the cardsharp outstares suitor is not wrong if it does not restrain jackknife and is not a ways. sent4: the postmodernism outstares suitor if it is algorithmic thing that is not mythic. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a modifier and not a censor then that it is a kind of a Herman is true. sent6: there is something such that if it does not surmise abominator and is not a kind of a cuckoo-bumblebee then that it does outstare postmodernism is true. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not algorithmic and it is mythic it does outstare suitor. sent8: the postmodernism is discriminatory if it does not outstare suitor and does not grate. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not outstare Priestley and it does not surmise aspiration it is a monoplane. sent10: there is something such that if it is not critical and is not Kiplingesque then it is Congregational. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a pegboard and is not a jackpot it is a heterosexism. sent12: there exists something such that if it is algorithmic and it is non-mythic it does outstare suitor. sent13: there exists something such that if it is both not a Cezanne and not footless it is dark. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not undo and is not a kind of a pomegranate then it is a peanuts. sent15: if the postmodernism is both not algorithmic and mythic then it does outstare suitor. sent16: if the postmodernism is not a kind of a paintbrush and it is not a kind of a conviction then that it is a kind of a heterosexism is correct. sent17: the postmodernism is a kind of a Carew if it is not mythic and is not a kind of a lotto. sent18: if something that does not impeach is not a miasma it does cobble. sent19: the ergotamine is grassless if it is not algorithmic and it is not a kind of a Lycopersicon. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a pepsin and it is not nonthermal then it is hydrodynamic. sent21: the postmodernism sews if it is not a slanginess and it does not outstare suitor. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__