the pipet is a tom.
sent1: that that the calla is not a kind of a Broglie but it is a kind of a tom hold is not correct if the pipet does consider. sent2: the calla does camouflage soaking. sent3: if the pipet is a tom then the calla is not a Broglie. sent4: the fact that the hagiographer does not camouflage Moynihan and it does not consider is not right if the alpaca is not mediatorial. sent5: that the semimonthly is not a apprehender but it detribalizes micrometeorite is not true. sent6: if something that is a apprehender is a kind of a aldol it is not mediatorial. sent7: if the calla is not mediatorial it considers and camouflages Moynihan. sent8: the pipet is not a kind of a tom if the calla makes. sent9: if that something is not a apprehender but it is a kind of a aldol is not true that it is not mediatorial is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the calla is not a tom is correct. sent11: the nanotube is a tom. sent12: the pipet is not postdiluvian. sent13: the fact that the pipet is not a Broglie is not false if the calla is a tom. sent14: something is not a tom if that it is not a kind of a Broglie and it is a tom is incorrect. sent15: that the calla is a Broglie is true. sent16: if the pipet is a Broglie then the calla is not a tom. sent17: if the fact that the semimonthly is not a apprehender and detribalizes micrometeorite is wrong then the alpaca is a apprehender. sent18: the Gael is a tom.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pipet is a tom.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the calla is not a Broglie.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the pipet is a tom.
sent9 -> int3: the calla is not mediatorial if that it is not a apprehender and is a aldol is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the pipet is a tom. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the calla is not a kind of a Broglie but it is a kind of a tom hold is not correct if the pipet does consider. sent2: the calla does camouflage soaking. sent3: if the pipet is a tom then the calla is not a Broglie. sent4: the fact that the hagiographer does not camouflage Moynihan and it does not consider is not right if the alpaca is not mediatorial. sent5: that the semimonthly is not a apprehender but it detribalizes micrometeorite is not true. sent6: if something that is a apprehender is a kind of a aldol it is not mediatorial. sent7: if the calla is not mediatorial it considers and camouflages Moynihan. sent8: the pipet is not a kind of a tom if the calla makes. sent9: if that something is not a apprehender but it is a kind of a aldol is not true that it is not mediatorial is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the calla is not a tom is correct. sent11: the nanotube is a tom. sent12: the pipet is not postdiluvian. sent13: the fact that the pipet is not a Broglie is not false if the calla is a tom. sent14: something is not a tom if that it is not a kind of a Broglie and it is a tom is incorrect. sent15: that the calla is a Broglie is true. sent16: if the pipet is a Broglie then the calla is not a tom. sent17: if the fact that the semimonthly is not a apprehender and detribalizes micrometeorite is wrong then the alpaca is a apprehender. sent18: the Gael is a tom. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pipet is a tom.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the calla is not a Broglie.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__