there exists something such that if it gongs that it is worldly and cellular is not right.
sent1: the fact that something is not spherical but it is factorial does not hold if it hisses. sent2: the fact that the egret is not unworldly but it is Lusitanian is not true. sent3: if the marc gongs then it does not scorch giveaway and is not a spring. sent4: the fact that something is not unworldly and it is not noncellular does not hold if it is a one-ninth. sent5: that the masquerader is a field but not a slur is not right if it is a kind of a fieldstone. sent6: that that the demulcent is not a kind of a kapuka and it is not noncellular is not correct is not incorrect. sent7: the matriculate is noncellular if it is a hiss. sent8: that that the riptide is a kind of non-irresistible thing that does not rinse is not false does not hold if it is unworldly. sent9: something that does kennel pteridophyte is not a peel and does not squire erethism. sent10: that the riptide is both not noncellular and chemoreceptive is wrong. sent11: if the riptide does gong then the fact that it is a one-ninth is right. sent12: there exists something such that if it is factorial then that it does not scorch giggle and it is human is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the riptide is a gong.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the riptide is a one-ninth.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the riptide is not unworldly and it is cellular is incorrect if that it is a one-ninth is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the riptide is not unworldly and it is not noncellular is not correct is not wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the riptide gongs that it is both not unworldly and not noncellular is wrong.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it gongs that it is worldly and cellular is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not spherical but it is factorial does not hold if it hisses. sent2: the fact that the egret is not unworldly but it is Lusitanian is not true. sent3: if the marc gongs then it does not scorch giveaway and is not a spring. sent4: the fact that something is not unworldly and it is not noncellular does not hold if it is a one-ninth. sent5: that the masquerader is a field but not a slur is not right if it is a kind of a fieldstone. sent6: that that the demulcent is not a kind of a kapuka and it is not noncellular is not correct is not incorrect. sent7: the matriculate is noncellular if it is a hiss. sent8: that that the riptide is a kind of non-irresistible thing that does not rinse is not false does not hold if it is unworldly. sent9: something that does kennel pteridophyte is not a peel and does not squire erethism. sent10: that the riptide is both not noncellular and chemoreceptive is wrong. sent11: if the riptide does gong then the fact that it is a one-ninth is right. sent12: there exists something such that if it is factorial then that it does not scorch giggle and it is human is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the riptide is a gong.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the riptide is a one-ninth.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the riptide is not unworldly and it is cellular is incorrect if that it is a one-ninth is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the riptide is not unworldly and it is not noncellular is not correct is not wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the riptide gongs that it is both not unworldly and not noncellular is wrong.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__