that the singling housecraft does not occur is correct.
sent1: if that both the photographicness and the unshockableness occurs is false the interceding happens. sent2: the exocentricness does not occur. sent3: that the husbandliness happens and the autoeciousness does not occur leads to that the resort happens. sent4: if the exocentricness does not occur the non-leonineness and the modifiableness happens. sent5: if the resort occurs but the superposition does not occur the singling housecraft does not occur. sent6: if the interceding happens the superposition does not occur. sent7: the fact that the leonineness does not occur and the unmodifiableness does not occur is false if the fact that the nonappearance does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the nonappearance is caused by that the photographicness but not the shockableness happens. sent9: the husbandliness occurs and the autoeciousness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the photographicness and the non-shockableness happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the nonappearance occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that both the non-leonineness and the modifiableness occurs is not true.; sent4 & sent2 -> int3: both the non-leonineness and the non-unmodifiableness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that both the photographicness and the unshockableness happens is not correct.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the interceding occurs.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the superposition does not occur.; sent3 & sent9 -> int8: the resorting occurs.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the resort but not the superposition happens.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the singling housecraft does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that both the photographicness and the unshockableness occurs is false the interceding happens. sent2: the exocentricness does not occur. sent3: that the husbandliness happens and the autoeciousness does not occur leads to that the resort happens. sent4: if the exocentricness does not occur the non-leonineness and the modifiableness happens. sent5: if the resort occurs but the superposition does not occur the singling housecraft does not occur. sent6: if the interceding happens the superposition does not occur. sent7: the fact that the leonineness does not occur and the unmodifiableness does not occur is false if the fact that the nonappearance does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the nonappearance is caused by that the photographicness but not the shockableness happens. sent9: the husbandliness occurs and the autoeciousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the photographicness and the non-shockableness happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the nonappearance occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that both the non-leonineness and the modifiableness occurs is not true.; sent4 & sent2 -> int3: both the non-leonineness and the non-unmodifiableness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that both the photographicness and the unshockableness happens is not correct.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the interceding occurs.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the superposition does not occur.; sent3 & sent9 -> int8: the resorting occurs.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the resort but not the superposition happens.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__