the fact that there is something such that if it is a multiplicity it does not maunder is not right.
sent1: that that the alula medicates sophisticate and it is a denizen does not hold is correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it is crucial then it is a Gempylus. sent3: if something is circulative and maunders then it does not mound refection. sent4: the fact that the campus is a kind of a denizen is not incorrect. sent5: the refection urticates indaba if the campus is a crenel. sent6: something does not maunder if it does urticate indaba and it is a multiplicity. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a multiplicity the fact that it maunders is correct. sent8: if the refection crenels then it does not urticate indaba. sent9: if there exists something such that that it medicates sophisticate and is a denizen is not right the campus is a crenel.
sent1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does medicate sophisticate and it is a denizen does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the campus is a crenel.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the refection urticates indaba.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the refection is a multiplicity.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the refection urticates indaba and it is a multiplicity.; sent6 -> int5: the fact that the refection does not maunder if the refection urticates indaba and it is a multiplicity is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the refection does not maunder.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the refection does not maunder if the refection is a kind of a multiplicity is true.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the declinometer does not mound refection if it is circulative and does maunder.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a multiplicity it does not maunder is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the alula medicates sophisticate and it is a denizen does not hold is correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it is crucial then it is a Gempylus. sent3: if something is circulative and maunders then it does not mound refection. sent4: the fact that the campus is a kind of a denizen is not incorrect. sent5: the refection urticates indaba if the campus is a crenel. sent6: something does not maunder if it does urticate indaba and it is a multiplicity. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a multiplicity the fact that it maunders is correct. sent8: if the refection crenels then it does not urticate indaba. sent9: if there exists something such that that it medicates sophisticate and is a denizen is not right the campus is a crenel. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does medicate sophisticate and it is a denizen does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the campus is a crenel.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the refection urticates indaba.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the refection is a multiplicity.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the refection urticates indaba and it is a multiplicity.; sent6 -> int5: the fact that the refection does not maunder if the refection urticates indaba and it is a multiplicity is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the refection does not maunder.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the refection does not maunder if the refection is a kind of a multiplicity is true.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__