the trend-setter is not a beige.
sent1: that the airbrush is a kind of a Girondism is true. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a perfection and it is agrologic then the airbrush is a kind of a height. sent3: if that the airbrush is a perfection that is a beige is not right the trend-setter is not a beige. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a beige and it is a Girondism. sent5: the trend-setter is a beige if a Girondism is a kind of a height. sent6: something is agrologic. sent7: the jam is both a perfection and agrologic.
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that it is both a perfection and agrologic.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the airbrush is a height is correct.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the airbrush is a Girondism and is a height.; int3 -> int4: something is a Girondism that is a kind of a height.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the trend-setter is not a beige is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the trend-setter is not a beige. ; $context$ = sent1: that the airbrush is a kind of a Girondism is true. sent2: if there exists something such that it is a perfection and it is agrologic then the airbrush is a kind of a height. sent3: if that the airbrush is a perfection that is a beige is not right the trend-setter is not a beige. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a beige and it is a Girondism. sent5: the trend-setter is a beige if a Girondism is a kind of a height. sent6: something is agrologic. sent7: the jam is both a perfection and agrologic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: there is something such that it is both a perfection and agrologic.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the airbrush is a height is correct.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the airbrush is a Girondism and is a height.; int3 -> int4: something is a Girondism that is a kind of a height.; int4 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__