the confidentness occurs.
sent1: if the fact that the piece occurs is not false the stifling lockdown does not occur or the sailing happens or both. sent2: the fact that the confidentness does not occur is not true if both the rendering rewa-rewa and the non-sugaryness happens. sent3: if that the rendering righteousness happens is not wrong then the rendering rewa-rewa happens. sent4: if the fact that the rendering rewa-rewa occurs and the rendering righteousness does not occur is not true then that the rendering rewa-rewa does not occur is true. sent5: the fact that the rendering Paraguay does not occur but the rendering righteousness happens is wrong if the option does not occur. sent6: the nonvolatileness does not occur if the sugariness occurs and the piecing does not occur. sent7: if the rendering rewa-rewa does not occur then the fact that both the non-nonvolatileness and the non-sugariness happens is incorrect. sent8: the nonvolatileness occurs. sent9: the localization occurs. sent10: that the rendering Paraguay happens leads to the rendering rewa-rewa. sent11: the stifling lockdown does not occur if the sailing does not occur. sent12: the stifling lockdown does not occur. sent13: if the option happens the rendering Paraguay does not occur. sent14: the vulnerableness happens. sent15: the quadrature occurs. sent16: that the sailing does not occur causes that the stifling lockdown does not occur and the piece does not occur. sent17: the localization happens and the sail does not occur. sent18: the stifling lockdown does not occur if that the non-nonvolatileness and the non-sugariness occurs is incorrect. sent19: the depiction does not occur if that the localization does not occur and the sail does not occur does not hold. sent20: if the rendering Paraguay does not occur that the rendering rewa-rewa but not the rendering righteousness occurs is false. sent21: that the nonvolatileness occurs and the sugariness does not occur is triggered by that the rendering rewa-rewa does not occur. sent22: if the localization does not occur then that the sailing and the confidentness happens is wrong.
sent17 -> int1: the sail does not occur.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the stifling lockdown does not occur and the piece does not occur.; int2 -> int3: that the piecing does not occur is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sugariness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the fact that the sugariness happens but the piecing does not occur hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the nonvolatileness does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the sugariness does not occur.;
the confidentness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the confidentness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the piece occurs is not false the stifling lockdown does not occur or the sailing happens or both. sent2: the fact that the confidentness does not occur is not true if both the rendering rewa-rewa and the non-sugaryness happens. sent3: if that the rendering righteousness happens is not wrong then the rendering rewa-rewa happens. sent4: if the fact that the rendering rewa-rewa occurs and the rendering righteousness does not occur is not true then that the rendering rewa-rewa does not occur is true. sent5: the fact that the rendering Paraguay does not occur but the rendering righteousness happens is wrong if the option does not occur. sent6: the nonvolatileness does not occur if the sugariness occurs and the piecing does not occur. sent7: if the rendering rewa-rewa does not occur then the fact that both the non-nonvolatileness and the non-sugariness happens is incorrect. sent8: the nonvolatileness occurs. sent9: the localization occurs. sent10: that the rendering Paraguay happens leads to the rendering rewa-rewa. sent11: the stifling lockdown does not occur if the sailing does not occur. sent12: the stifling lockdown does not occur. sent13: if the option happens the rendering Paraguay does not occur. sent14: the vulnerableness happens. sent15: the quadrature occurs. sent16: that the sailing does not occur causes that the stifling lockdown does not occur and the piece does not occur. sent17: the localization happens and the sail does not occur. sent18: the stifling lockdown does not occur if that the non-nonvolatileness and the non-sugariness occurs is incorrect. sent19: the depiction does not occur if that the localization does not occur and the sail does not occur does not hold. sent20: if the rendering Paraguay does not occur that the rendering rewa-rewa but not the rendering righteousness occurs is false. sent21: that the nonvolatileness occurs and the sugariness does not occur is triggered by that the rendering rewa-rewa does not occur. sent22: if the localization does not occur then that the sailing and the confidentness happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the sail does not occur.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the stifling lockdown does not occur and the piece does not occur.; int2 -> int3: that the piecing does not occur is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sugariness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the fact that the sugariness happens but the piecing does not occur hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the nonvolatileness does not occur.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the sugariness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__