the oceanographer is a heat.
sent1: if the waterpower is not a kind of a radial it articulates and it is a bragger. sent2: the fact that the soup is not incapable but it confines multiplicand does not hold. sent3: the fact that the soup is not incapable and it does not confine multiplicand is not right. sent4: if the fact that the soup is not incapable and it does not confine multiplicand is not true the waterpower does lose homophobe. sent5: if something is a kind of a spinal that it is not agrobiologic and it is unthematic is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is incapable or it does not articulate or both is false. sent7: if something is a radial it is semiterrestrial. sent8: if the waterpower does lose homophobe the fact that it is not articulate and/or it is not a bragger does not hold. sent9: if there is something such that that it does not articulate and/or it is not a bragger is wrong the placer is a radial. sent10: the oceanographer does heat if the mew is agrobiologic. sent11: the oceanographer is a heat if that the mew is not agrobiologic but it is unthematic is incorrect. sent12: there is something such that it is a bragger. sent13: the waterpower is articulate if it is unthematic. sent14: if the placer is semiterrestrial the mew is spinal. sent15: that the soup is incapable and does not confine multiplicand is wrong.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the waterpower does lose homophobe.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the waterpower is not articulate and/or is not a bragger does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not articulate and/or it is not a bragger is wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the placer is a radial.; sent7 -> int5: if the placer is a radial it is semiterrestrial.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the placer is semiterrestrial.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the mew is a kind of a spinal.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that the mew is non-agrobiologic thing that is unthematic is false if it is a kind of a spinal.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the mew is a kind of non-agrobiologic thing that is unthematic is not right.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the oceanographer does not heat is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the oceanographer is a heat. ; $context$ = sent1: if the waterpower is not a kind of a radial it articulates and it is a bragger. sent2: the fact that the soup is not incapable but it confines multiplicand does not hold. sent3: the fact that the soup is not incapable and it does not confine multiplicand is not right. sent4: if the fact that the soup is not incapable and it does not confine multiplicand is not true the waterpower does lose homophobe. sent5: if something is a kind of a spinal that it is not agrobiologic and it is unthematic is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is incapable or it does not articulate or both is false. sent7: if something is a radial it is semiterrestrial. sent8: if the waterpower does lose homophobe the fact that it is not articulate and/or it is not a bragger does not hold. sent9: if there is something such that that it does not articulate and/or it is not a bragger is wrong the placer is a radial. sent10: the oceanographer does heat if the mew is agrobiologic. sent11: the oceanographer is a heat if that the mew is not agrobiologic but it is unthematic is incorrect. sent12: there is something such that it is a bragger. sent13: the waterpower is articulate if it is unthematic. sent14: if the placer is semiterrestrial the mew is spinal. sent15: that the soup is incapable and does not confine multiplicand is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the waterpower does lose homophobe.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the waterpower is not articulate and/or is not a bragger does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not articulate and/or it is not a bragger is wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the placer is a radial.; sent7 -> int5: if the placer is a radial it is semiterrestrial.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the placer is semiterrestrial.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the mew is a kind of a spinal.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that the mew is non-agrobiologic thing that is unthematic is false if it is a kind of a spinal.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the mew is a kind of non-agrobiologic thing that is unthematic is not right.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__