the Bast is a exaltation.
sent1: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it is a disturber and it is a kind of a exaltation is wrong the snapshot is not a kind of a exaltation is correct. sent2: if something is a disturber it is not a sinkhole. sent3: that something is a disturber and a exaltation is wrong if it is not a sinkhole. sent4: the Charlotte is enteric. sent5: if that the Charlotte is enteric is not wrong then the fact that it is a kind of a toss and it is not glial is incorrect. sent6: if something that is inclement does not suspend then it is not polemoniaceous. sent7: the guar is not a kind of a sinkhole if the snapshot is not a sinkhole. sent8: the showerhead does not toss. sent9: if something is a Himantoglossum it tosses. sent10: the Charlotte does not toss if that it is a toss and it is not glial is not right. sent11: if the pinchgut is a kind of a sunniness then the spelt is a sunniness. sent12: the Bast is not a exaltation if the snapshot is not a exaltation but polemoniaceous. sent13: that the snapshot is a kind of a Himantoglossum if either the gastrulation is not polemoniaceous or it scorches or both is not wrong. sent14: the gastrulation is a exaltation if it is inclement. sent15: if the spelt is a sunniness it is not a sinkhole. sent16: that the clapperboard is not a Cervus and is not a sunniness does not hold. sent17: if the fact that the gastrulation is a kind of inclement thing that does not suspend does not hold the Bast is a exaltation. sent18: the showerhead is a kind of a disturber. sent19: the snapshot is not a toss if the showerhead does not toss and it is not a sinkhole. sent20: the snapshot is not a kind of a sinkhole if something is either not a scorch or polemoniaceous or both. sent21: if there exists something such that that it is both not a Cervus and not a sunniness does not hold the pinchgut is a sunniness.
sent6 -> int1: the gastrulation is not polemoniaceous if it is inclement thing that does not suspend.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gastrulation is inclement and does not suspend.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gastrulation is not polemoniaceous.; int2 -> int3: the gastrulation is not polemoniaceous or it is a scorch or both.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the snapshot is a kind of a Himantoglossum.; sent9 -> int5: if the snapshot is a Himantoglossum it tosses.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the snapshot does toss.; sent2 -> int7: if the showerhead is a kind of a disturber it is not a sinkhole.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the showerhead is not a kind of a sinkhole.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the showerhead does not toss and is not a sinkhole.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the snapshot does not toss.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: that the fact that the gastrulation is inclement but it does not suspend is not right is true.; int12 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the Bast is not a exaltation.
sent3 -> int13: if the spelt is not a sinkhole the fact that it is a kind of a disturber and is a exaltation does not hold.; sent16 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Cervus and it is not a sunniness is not true.; int14 & sent21 -> int15: the pinchgut is a sunniness.; sent11 & int15 -> int16: the spelt is a sunniness.; sent15 & int16 -> int17: the spelt is not a sinkhole.; int13 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the fact that the spelt is a disturber that is a kind of a exaltation is false is not wrong.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a disturber and it is a exaltation does not hold.; int19 & sent1 -> int20: the snapshot is not a kind of a exaltation.; sent5 & sent4 -> int21: the fact that the Charlotte is a toss but it is not glial is not right.; sent10 & int21 -> int22: that the Charlotte is not a toss hold.; int22 -> int23: there is something such that that it is not a toss is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Bast is a exaltation. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it is a disturber and it is a kind of a exaltation is wrong the snapshot is not a kind of a exaltation is correct. sent2: if something is a disturber it is not a sinkhole. sent3: that something is a disturber and a exaltation is wrong if it is not a sinkhole. sent4: the Charlotte is enteric. sent5: if that the Charlotte is enteric is not wrong then the fact that it is a kind of a toss and it is not glial is incorrect. sent6: if something that is inclement does not suspend then it is not polemoniaceous. sent7: the guar is not a kind of a sinkhole if the snapshot is not a sinkhole. sent8: the showerhead does not toss. sent9: if something is a Himantoglossum it tosses. sent10: the Charlotte does not toss if that it is a toss and it is not glial is not right. sent11: if the pinchgut is a kind of a sunniness then the spelt is a sunniness. sent12: the Bast is not a exaltation if the snapshot is not a exaltation but polemoniaceous. sent13: that the snapshot is a kind of a Himantoglossum if either the gastrulation is not polemoniaceous or it scorches or both is not wrong. sent14: the gastrulation is a exaltation if it is inclement. sent15: if the spelt is a sunniness it is not a sinkhole. sent16: that the clapperboard is not a Cervus and is not a sunniness does not hold. sent17: if the fact that the gastrulation is a kind of inclement thing that does not suspend does not hold the Bast is a exaltation. sent18: the showerhead is a kind of a disturber. sent19: the snapshot is not a toss if the showerhead does not toss and it is not a sinkhole. sent20: the snapshot is not a kind of a sinkhole if something is either not a scorch or polemoniaceous or both. sent21: if there exists something such that that it is both not a Cervus and not a sunniness does not hold the pinchgut is a sunniness. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the gastrulation is not polemoniaceous if it is inclement thing that does not suspend.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gastrulation is inclement and does not suspend.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the gastrulation is not polemoniaceous.; int2 -> int3: the gastrulation is not polemoniaceous or it is a scorch or both.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the snapshot is a kind of a Himantoglossum.; sent9 -> int5: if the snapshot is a Himantoglossum it tosses.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the snapshot does toss.; sent2 -> int7: if the showerhead is a kind of a disturber it is not a sinkhole.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the showerhead is not a kind of a sinkhole.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the showerhead does not toss and is not a sinkhole.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the snapshot does not toss.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: that the fact that the gastrulation is inclement but it does not suspend is not right is true.; int12 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__