the hug-me-tight clouts chlordiazepoxide and it does collar Kordofan.
sent1: if the jawbreaker is not a countersignature it entails sahib. sent2: if something is not secular the fact that it does entail sahib and it is not hymenal is wrong. sent3: the fieldwork does clout chlordiazepoxide. sent4: the hug-me-tight is not secular. sent5: the jawbreaker is not secular if something that is not Soviets does not collar myology. sent6: if the hug-me-tight is not Soviets that it does not clout chlordiazepoxide and it is secular is not true. sent7: that the jawbreaker is not a countersignature hold. sent8: if the jawbreaker does entail sahib and is not secular the hug-me-tight is hymenal. sent9: the pansexual collars Kordofan and it is a countersignature if there exists something such that it does not entail sahib. sent10: the jawbreaker does collar Kordofan. sent11: something does not collar Kordofan. sent12: the chevrotain is secular. sent13: there is something such that it is not Soviets. sent14: the fact that there exists something such that it collars Kordofan and is non-secular is not incorrect. sent15: there exists something such that it does not collar myology. sent16: something does clout chlordiazepoxide if it is hymenal. sent17: if the hug-me-tight is a quire then the fact that it does clout chlordiazepoxide is right. sent18: The Kordofan does collar hug-me-tight. sent19: there is something such that it is not Soviets and does not collar myology. sent20: something entails sahib if the fact that it is secular is correct. sent21: if the fact that something does not clout chlordiazepoxide and is secular is not right then it is not secular. sent22: the hug-me-tight is nosocomial if it is not a kind of a kala-azar. sent23: the hug-me-tight is not Soviets.
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the jawbreaker does entail sahib.; sent19 & sent5 -> int2: the jawbreaker is not secular.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the jawbreaker does entail sahib and is not secular.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the hug-me-tight is hymenal hold.; sent16 -> int5: the hug-me-tight clouts chlordiazepoxide if it is hymenal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the hug-me-tight does clout chlordiazepoxide.;
the pansexual collars Kordofan.
sent2 -> int7: that that the hug-me-tight entails sahib but it is non-hymenal is correct is incorrect if it is not secular.; sent21 -> int8: if the fact that the hug-me-tight does not clout chlordiazepoxide and is secular is false then it is not secular.; sent6 & sent23 -> int9: the fact that the hug-me-tight does not clout chlordiazepoxide and is secular is incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the hug-me-tight is not secular.; int7 & int10 -> int11: that the hug-me-tight entails sahib but it is not hymenal is not right.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it does entail sahib and is not hymenal does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the hug-me-tight clouts chlordiazepoxide and it does collar Kordofan. ; $context$ = sent1: if the jawbreaker is not a countersignature it entails sahib. sent2: if something is not secular the fact that it does entail sahib and it is not hymenal is wrong. sent3: the fieldwork does clout chlordiazepoxide. sent4: the hug-me-tight is not secular. sent5: the jawbreaker is not secular if something that is not Soviets does not collar myology. sent6: if the hug-me-tight is not Soviets that it does not clout chlordiazepoxide and it is secular is not true. sent7: that the jawbreaker is not a countersignature hold. sent8: if the jawbreaker does entail sahib and is not secular the hug-me-tight is hymenal. sent9: the pansexual collars Kordofan and it is a countersignature if there exists something such that it does not entail sahib. sent10: the jawbreaker does collar Kordofan. sent11: something does not collar Kordofan. sent12: the chevrotain is secular. sent13: there is something such that it is not Soviets. sent14: the fact that there exists something such that it collars Kordofan and is non-secular is not incorrect. sent15: there exists something such that it does not collar myology. sent16: something does clout chlordiazepoxide if it is hymenal. sent17: if the hug-me-tight is a quire then the fact that it does clout chlordiazepoxide is right. sent18: The Kordofan does collar hug-me-tight. sent19: there is something such that it is not Soviets and does not collar myology. sent20: something entails sahib if the fact that it is secular is correct. sent21: if the fact that something does not clout chlordiazepoxide and is secular is not right then it is not secular. sent22: the hug-me-tight is nosocomial if it is not a kind of a kala-azar. sent23: the hug-me-tight is not Soviets. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the jawbreaker does entail sahib.; sent19 & sent5 -> int2: the jawbreaker is not secular.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the jawbreaker does entail sahib and is not secular.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the hug-me-tight is hymenal hold.; sent16 -> int5: the hug-me-tight clouts chlordiazepoxide if it is hymenal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the hug-me-tight does clout chlordiazepoxide.; __UNKNOWN__