the excusing action does not occur.
sent1: the segregation occurs. sent2: the fact that the impenitentness and the geocentricness happens does not hold if the digitigrade does not occur. sent3: that the digitigradeness does not occur is brought about by that the impacting Punjab and the retaking happens. sent4: the fact that the impacting Punjab occurs hold. sent5: the fact that not the LIFO but the searing happens is not correct if the fact that the fluorescence occurs hold. sent6: if the fact that the quarrel happens is not wrong then that the sensationalness occurs or the bowl does not occur or both is not true. sent7: the gun does not occur if both the reliableness and the ascension happens. sent8: if that the impenitentness happens and the geocentricness occurs does not hold then the fact that the geocentricness does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: if the locomotiveness happens then both the quarrelling and the non-epicureanness occurs. sent10: that the verge does not occur but the excusing action occurs is triggered by that the searing does not occur. sent11: the fact that not the sensationalness but the verge occurs is false if the bowl happens. sent12: the verge does not occur if that the non-sensationalness and the verge occurs is false. sent13: both the Elizabethanness and the incidentness occurs. sent14: the searing does not occur if the fact that that the LIFO does not occur but the searing occurs does not hold hold. sent15: that the fluorescence and the rental occurs is triggered by that the geocentricness does not occur. sent16: the verging happens. sent17: the repudiation does not occur if the segregation does not occur and the verging does not occur. sent18: the segregation does not occur if the fact that the sensationalness occurs and/or the bowl does not occur is incorrect.
sent1 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the segregation occurs and the verging happens is not incorrect.;
the excusing action occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the excusing action does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the segregation occurs. sent2: the fact that the impenitentness and the geocentricness happens does not hold if the digitigrade does not occur. sent3: that the digitigradeness does not occur is brought about by that the impacting Punjab and the retaking happens. sent4: the fact that the impacting Punjab occurs hold. sent5: the fact that not the LIFO but the searing happens is not correct if the fact that the fluorescence occurs hold. sent6: if the fact that the quarrel happens is not wrong then that the sensationalness occurs or the bowl does not occur or both is not true. sent7: the gun does not occur if both the reliableness and the ascension happens. sent8: if that the impenitentness happens and the geocentricness occurs does not hold then the fact that the geocentricness does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: if the locomotiveness happens then both the quarrelling and the non-epicureanness occurs. sent10: that the verge does not occur but the excusing action occurs is triggered by that the searing does not occur. sent11: the fact that not the sensationalness but the verge occurs is false if the bowl happens. sent12: the verge does not occur if that the non-sensationalness and the verge occurs is false. sent13: both the Elizabethanness and the incidentness occurs. sent14: the searing does not occur if the fact that that the LIFO does not occur but the searing occurs does not hold hold. sent15: that the fluorescence and the rental occurs is triggered by that the geocentricness does not occur. sent16: the verging happens. sent17: the repudiation does not occur if the segregation does not occur and the verging does not occur. sent18: the segregation does not occur if the fact that the sensationalness occurs and/or the bowl does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the segregation occurs and the verging happens is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__