the fact that the mattress is nonmechanical is not wrong.
sent1: the mattress is nonmechanical if the dietician is not apophatic. sent2: the fact that something is a bowing and is not a barbell does not hold if it is not pharyngeal. sent3: if the dietician is not nonmechanical then that the mattress drapes dietician is right. sent4: the sedge exceeds behaviorist. sent5: that the mastoidale does exceed mattress but it does not exceed behaviorist is correct. sent6: if the fact that the swatch is epistemic hold then the fact that the sedge is both not a hydroxyl and a goldbeater is not true. sent7: something is not pharyngeal if the fact that it is not a hydroxyl and it is a goldbeater does not hold. sent8: there is something such that it does not exceed mattress. sent9: the mastoidale is styleless. sent10: the fact that the sedge does bow but it is not a kind of a barbell is not incorrect if there is something such that it does not exceed behaviorist. sent11: that the dietician does not drape dietician but it is unreal does not hold if it is apophatic. sent12: if the dietician is not a kind of a hydroxyl the sedge drapes dietician. sent13: the feast is unreal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dietician is apophatic.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the dietician does not drape dietician and is not real is wrong.; sent7 -> int2: the sedge is not pharyngeal if that it is not a hydroxyl and it is a goldbeater does not hold.; sent2 -> int3: if the sedge is not pharyngeal that it does bow and it is not a kind of a barbell is not correct.; sent5 -> int4: the mastoidale does not exceed behaviorist.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it does not exceed behaviorist.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the sedge bows but it is not a barbell.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mattress is nonmechanical is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the mattress is nonmechanical if the dietician is not apophatic. sent2: the fact that something is a bowing and is not a barbell does not hold if it is not pharyngeal. sent3: if the dietician is not nonmechanical then that the mattress drapes dietician is right. sent4: the sedge exceeds behaviorist. sent5: that the mastoidale does exceed mattress but it does not exceed behaviorist is correct. sent6: if the fact that the swatch is epistemic hold then the fact that the sedge is both not a hydroxyl and a goldbeater is not true. sent7: something is not pharyngeal if the fact that it is not a hydroxyl and it is a goldbeater does not hold. sent8: there is something such that it does not exceed mattress. sent9: the mastoidale is styleless. sent10: the fact that the sedge does bow but it is not a kind of a barbell is not incorrect if there is something such that it does not exceed behaviorist. sent11: that the dietician does not drape dietician but it is unreal does not hold if it is apophatic. sent12: if the dietician is not a kind of a hydroxyl the sedge drapes dietician. sent13: the feast is unreal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dietician is apophatic.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the dietician does not drape dietician and is not real is wrong.; sent7 -> int2: the sedge is not pharyngeal if that it is not a hydroxyl and it is a goldbeater does not hold.; sent2 -> int3: if the sedge is not pharyngeal that it does bow and it is not a kind of a barbell is not correct.; sent5 -> int4: the mastoidale does not exceed behaviorist.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it does not exceed behaviorist.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the sedge bows but it is not a barbell.; __UNKNOWN__