the evanescing does not occur.
sent1: if the luminescence occurs then the unerectness happens. sent2: if that both the non-hormonalness and the occlusion happens is not right then the evanescing happens. sent3: if the fact that both the attentiveness and the finedrawing haranguer happens is not right the fact that the hormonalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the neutralization does not occur then the inefficaciousness and the roundhouse happens. sent5: that the simoom does not occur causes that both the luminescence and the arson occurs. sent6: that the inefficaciousness happens leads to that the chocking cinchonine but not the simoom happens. sent7: that the briefing Transportation does not occur or the unerectness or both prevents the perambulation. sent8: that the attentiveness and the finedrawing haranguer happens is wrong. sent9: the fact that the hormonalness does not occur but the occlusion occurs is not correct if that the perambulation does not occur hold. sent10: not the evanescing but the occlusion happens if the hormonalness does not occur.
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the hormonalness does not occur.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the evanescing does not occur but the occlusion occurs.; int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the evanescing happens is right.
$hypothesis$ = the evanescing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the luminescence occurs then the unerectness happens. sent2: if that both the non-hormonalness and the occlusion happens is not right then the evanescing happens. sent3: if the fact that both the attentiveness and the finedrawing haranguer happens is not right the fact that the hormonalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the neutralization does not occur then the inefficaciousness and the roundhouse happens. sent5: that the simoom does not occur causes that both the luminescence and the arson occurs. sent6: that the inefficaciousness happens leads to that the chocking cinchonine but not the simoom happens. sent7: that the briefing Transportation does not occur or the unerectness or both prevents the perambulation. sent8: that the attentiveness and the finedrawing haranguer happens is wrong. sent9: the fact that the hormonalness does not occur but the occlusion occurs is not correct if that the perambulation does not occur hold. sent10: not the evanescing but the occlusion happens if the hormonalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the hormonalness does not occur.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the evanescing does not occur but the occlusion occurs.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__