that the Mauritian is analytic and antipollution if the fact that the clay does not flatten ruse is not wrong is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the dulciana does discount and it is analytic is not true if it is not a driving. sent2: the clay does not discount if it is a one-ninth and a paleobiology. sent3: there is something such that it cords and it is a kind of a sixteen. sent4: the clay is antipollution but it is not a paleobiology. sent5: the fact that the clay is a discount is not false if the jet is a discount. sent6: something does not drive but it does flatten ruse. sent7: the Mauritian is analytic if there is something such that it is not a kind of a driving and it does not flatten ruse. sent8: if something does turf shoveler and is not a kind of a discount then it does not drive. sent9: the agua is antipollution. sent10: the clay does not discount if it is a one-ninth but not a paleobiology. sent11: the clay is a one-ninth and not a paleobiology. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a corded and it is a sixteen the clay turfs shoveler. sent13: the clay is non-analytic. sent14: there exists something such that it is not analytic. sent15: if that the agua is a kind of a paleobiology but it is not a kind of a driving does not hold then the dulciana is not a driving. sent16: the jet is not a kind of a driving if it is antipollution and is a paleobiology. sent17: the fact that the cavity is a one-ninth hold. sent18: there is something such that it does not flatten ruse. sent19: if that there exists something such that the fact that it is a discount that is analytic is wrong is not incorrect then that the jet is not a discount is not incorrect. sent20: if the jet is antipollution then the Mauritian is antipollution. sent21: the fact that the Mauritian turfs shoveler if something is not a discount hold. sent22: there exists something such that it is a kind of a sixteen. sent23: the jet turfs shoveler if something that is not a driving is not antipollution. sent24: the jet is antipollution. sent25: if the fact that the agua is antipollution is true then that it is a paleobiology that is not a driving is wrong. sent26: the clay is not a kind of a paleobiology. sent27: the shoveler is not analytic. sent28: the clay does not case pointillism.
sent3 & sent12 -> int1: the clay does turf shoveler.; sent10 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the clay does not discount is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the clay turfs shoveler but it is not a discount.; sent8 -> int4: if the clay turfs shoveler but it is not a discount it is not a driving.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the clay is not a driving.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clay does not flatten ruse.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the clay is not a kind of a driving and it does not flatten ruse.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does not drive and does not flatten ruse.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the fact that the Mauritian is analytic is not incorrect.; sent20 & sent24 -> int9: the Mauritian is antipollution.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the Mauritian is analytic and antipollution.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the juvenescence flattens ruse.
sent25 & sent9 -> int11: the fact that the agua is a kind of a paleobiology but it is not a driving does not hold.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the dulciana is not a driving.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: that the dulciana is a discount and is analytic is incorrect.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it is a discount and it is analytic is not true.; int14 & sent19 -> int15: the jet is not a discount.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a discount.; int16 & sent21 -> int17: the Mauritian does turf shoveler.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it turfs shoveler.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Mauritian is analytic and antipollution if the fact that the clay does not flatten ruse is not wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the dulciana does discount and it is analytic is not true if it is not a driving. sent2: the clay does not discount if it is a one-ninth and a paleobiology. sent3: there is something such that it cords and it is a kind of a sixteen. sent4: the clay is antipollution but it is not a paleobiology. sent5: the fact that the clay is a discount is not false if the jet is a discount. sent6: something does not drive but it does flatten ruse. sent7: the Mauritian is analytic if there is something such that it is not a kind of a driving and it does not flatten ruse. sent8: if something does turf shoveler and is not a kind of a discount then it does not drive. sent9: the agua is antipollution. sent10: the clay does not discount if it is a one-ninth but not a paleobiology. sent11: the clay is a one-ninth and not a paleobiology. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a corded and it is a sixteen the clay turfs shoveler. sent13: the clay is non-analytic. sent14: there exists something such that it is not analytic. sent15: if that the agua is a kind of a paleobiology but it is not a kind of a driving does not hold then the dulciana is not a driving. sent16: the jet is not a kind of a driving if it is antipollution and is a paleobiology. sent17: the fact that the cavity is a one-ninth hold. sent18: there is something such that it does not flatten ruse. sent19: if that there exists something such that the fact that it is a discount that is analytic is wrong is not incorrect then that the jet is not a discount is not incorrect. sent20: if the jet is antipollution then the Mauritian is antipollution. sent21: the fact that the Mauritian turfs shoveler if something is not a discount hold. sent22: there exists something such that it is a kind of a sixteen. sent23: the jet turfs shoveler if something that is not a driving is not antipollution. sent24: the jet is antipollution. sent25: if the fact that the agua is antipollution is true then that it is a paleobiology that is not a driving is wrong. sent26: the clay is not a kind of a paleobiology. sent27: the shoveler is not analytic. sent28: the clay does not case pointillism. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent12 -> int1: the clay does turf shoveler.; sent10 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the clay does not discount is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the clay turfs shoveler but it is not a discount.; sent8 -> int4: if the clay turfs shoveler but it is not a discount it is not a driving.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the clay is not a driving.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clay does not flatten ruse.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the clay is not a kind of a driving and it does not flatten ruse.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does not drive and does not flatten ruse.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the fact that the Mauritian is analytic is not incorrect.; sent20 & sent24 -> int9: the Mauritian is antipollution.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the Mauritian is analytic and antipollution.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__