the invaliding is prevented by that both the downspin and the skimming occurs.
sent1: the narrowing fiefdom happens. sent2: the diving happens. sent3: if the downspin happens and the diving happens then the invalid does not occur. sent4: if that the downspin happens is wrong then the narrowing mammalogist and the ambassadorialness happens. sent5: the jiggling Welshman does not occur. sent6: the catkinateness and the apomicticness happens. sent7: the dibbling and the stuffing steamroller happens. sent8: that the jiggling SNP happens is prevented by that the chinook occurs and the boating happens. sent9: the gubernatorialness occurs. sent10: both the invalidness and the sublingualness occurs if the stuffing goad does not occur. sent11: the fact that the invalid occurs is correct. sent12: that both the downspin and the skimming occurs prevents the non-invalidness. sent13: the overkill happens. sent14: the stuffing selector and the stuffing mirror happens. sent15: both the smut and the bawling occurs. sent16: the skimming happens. sent17: if the runoff does not occur then the narrowing eschatologist does not occur and the stuffing goad does not occur. sent18: both the lugging and the inelegantness happens. sent19: that the downspin happens and the diving happens brings about the invalid.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the downspin occurs and the skimming happens.; assump1 -> int1: the downspin occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: both the downspin and the diving happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the invalid does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the narrowing mammalogist and the ambassadorialness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the invaliding is prevented by that both the downspin and the skimming occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the narrowing fiefdom happens. sent2: the diving happens. sent3: if the downspin happens and the diving happens then the invalid does not occur. sent4: if that the downspin happens is wrong then the narrowing mammalogist and the ambassadorialness happens. sent5: the jiggling Welshman does not occur. sent6: the catkinateness and the apomicticness happens. sent7: the dibbling and the stuffing steamroller happens. sent8: that the jiggling SNP happens is prevented by that the chinook occurs and the boating happens. sent9: the gubernatorialness occurs. sent10: both the invalidness and the sublingualness occurs if the stuffing goad does not occur. sent11: the fact that the invalid occurs is correct. sent12: that both the downspin and the skimming occurs prevents the non-invalidness. sent13: the overkill happens. sent14: the stuffing selector and the stuffing mirror happens. sent15: both the smut and the bawling occurs. sent16: the skimming happens. sent17: if the runoff does not occur then the narrowing eschatologist does not occur and the stuffing goad does not occur. sent18: both the lugging and the inelegantness happens. sent19: that the downspin happens and the diving happens brings about the invalid. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the downspin occurs and the skimming happens.; assump1 -> int1: the downspin occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: both the downspin and the diving happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the invalid does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__