the fact that the stonework is a kind of a macrencephaly is not incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that the internist is a garrulity and/or is not a repeat is wrong then the Scout is a repeat. sent2: The fact that the advent does not overturn polack hold. sent3: the stonework is not a macrencephaly if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-stabling thing that does not hedge is wrong. sent4: the Scout is not a macrencephaly. sent5: something that is non-stabling thing that is not a hedge is not a kind of a haze. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a stodge and overturns mansard is not right the internist is not washable. sent7: if the Scout is not a garrulity and it does not repeat then the internist is washable. sent8: the polack is a kind of a macrencephaly if the Scout is a macrencephaly. sent9: if the zarf does not haze the Scout is not a garrulity and it does not repeat. sent10: the fact that the polack does not overturn advent hold. sent11: if the polack is a kind of a macrencephaly that is not stabling the stonework overturns advent. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not overturn advent that the simvastatin is not a stodge and overturns mansard is not true. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a aphelion that is a Mayer does not hold. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a macrencephaly the Scout does not repeat. sent15: if something that is not a rebozo does not overturn nurse-midwife the fact that it does not down is not false. sent16: something is both a haze and washable if it does not overturn mansard.
sent5 -> int1: the zarf is not a kind of a haze if it is non-stabling thing that does not hedge.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zarf does not stable and does not hedge.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the zarf is not a haze.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the Scout is not a garrulity and it is not a repeat.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the internist is washable is right.; sent10 -> int5: there is something such that it does not overturn advent.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: that the simvastatin is not a kind of a stodge but it overturns mansard is not right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a stodge and does overturn mansard is not true.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: that the internist is not washable is not false.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the zarf is not stabling and does not hedge is not true.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a stabling and it is not a hedge is false.; int11 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the polack is a macrencephaly.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stonework is a kind of a macrencephaly is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the internist is a garrulity and/or is not a repeat is wrong then the Scout is a repeat. sent2: The fact that the advent does not overturn polack hold. sent3: the stonework is not a macrencephaly if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-stabling thing that does not hedge is wrong. sent4: the Scout is not a macrencephaly. sent5: something that is non-stabling thing that is not a hedge is not a kind of a haze. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a stodge and overturns mansard is not right the internist is not washable. sent7: if the Scout is not a garrulity and it does not repeat then the internist is washable. sent8: the polack is a kind of a macrencephaly if the Scout is a macrencephaly. sent9: if the zarf does not haze the Scout is not a garrulity and it does not repeat. sent10: the fact that the polack does not overturn advent hold. sent11: if the polack is a kind of a macrencephaly that is not stabling the stonework overturns advent. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not overturn advent that the simvastatin is not a stodge and overturns mansard is not true. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a aphelion that is a Mayer does not hold. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a macrencephaly the Scout does not repeat. sent15: if something that is not a rebozo does not overturn nurse-midwife the fact that it does not down is not false. sent16: something is both a haze and washable if it does not overturn mansard. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the zarf is not a kind of a haze if it is non-stabling thing that does not hedge.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zarf does not stable and does not hedge.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the zarf is not a haze.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the Scout is not a garrulity and it is not a repeat.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the internist is washable is right.; sent10 -> int5: there is something such that it does not overturn advent.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: that the simvastatin is not a kind of a stodge but it overturns mansard is not right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a stodge and does overturn mansard is not true.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: that the internist is not washable is not false.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the zarf is not stabling and does not hedge is not true.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a stabling and it is not a hedge is false.; int11 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__