the cavalryman does not count Strix.
sent1: if the coloring does not grade ampulla the owlet does not stumble Aethionema and does not stumble Cornwall. sent2: the owlet does not count Strix. sent3: the owlet is not a echinocactus. sent4: if the owlet is not a kind of a penciled the hyperventilation is not a echinocactus and does not count Strix. sent5: the hyperventilation is a whalesucker if the coloring grades ampulla. sent6: if the hyperventilation is a kind of a penciled then the cavalryman does count Strix. sent7: if the cavalryman is a penciled then the hyperventilation is optative. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not a penciled is not incorrect that the owlet is both not non-optative and a whalesucker is not true. sent9: the cavalryman is not ontological and it is not a kind of a optative. sent10: the fact that the assessor does stumble Cornwall hold. sent11: if the owlet does not stumble Aethionema and it does not stumble Cornwall then it is a echinocactus. sent12: if the fact that the pachuco is a kind of a AAS and is not a kind of a Gastrocybe is not correct then the hyperventilation does not pencil. sent13: the fact that the pachuco is a kind of a AAS but it is not a Gastrocybe does not hold if it stokes message. sent14: the Milk does pencil. sent15: something does not grade ampulla if the fact that it is a optative and it is a whalesucker does not hold. sent16: that the owlet grades ampulla is not wrong if the coloring stumbles Cornwall. sent17: if there is something such that that it does not grade ampulla hold then the fact that the coloring does count Strix but it is not a kind of a echinocactus is not right. sent18: the hyperventilation is a optative if it is a kind of a whalesucker. sent19: if the hyperventilation is a kind of a optative it is a penciled.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coloring does not grade ampulla.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the owlet does not stumble Aethionema and it does not stumble Cornwall.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the owlet is a echinocactus.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the coloring grades ampulla.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the hyperventilation is a whalesucker.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the hyperventilation is a optative.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the hyperventilation is a kind of a penciled.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the cavalryman does not count Strix.
sent15 -> int8: if the fact that the owlet is a optative and is a whalesucker is wrong it does not grade ampulla.;
$hypothesis$ = the cavalryman does not count Strix. ; $context$ = sent1: if the coloring does not grade ampulla the owlet does not stumble Aethionema and does not stumble Cornwall. sent2: the owlet does not count Strix. sent3: the owlet is not a echinocactus. sent4: if the owlet is not a kind of a penciled the hyperventilation is not a echinocactus and does not count Strix. sent5: the hyperventilation is a whalesucker if the coloring grades ampulla. sent6: if the hyperventilation is a kind of a penciled then the cavalryman does count Strix. sent7: if the cavalryman is a penciled then the hyperventilation is optative. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not a penciled is not incorrect that the owlet is both not non-optative and a whalesucker is not true. sent9: the cavalryman is not ontological and it is not a kind of a optative. sent10: the fact that the assessor does stumble Cornwall hold. sent11: if the owlet does not stumble Aethionema and it does not stumble Cornwall then it is a echinocactus. sent12: if the fact that the pachuco is a kind of a AAS and is not a kind of a Gastrocybe is not correct then the hyperventilation does not pencil. sent13: the fact that the pachuco is a kind of a AAS but it is not a Gastrocybe does not hold if it stokes message. sent14: the Milk does pencil. sent15: something does not grade ampulla if the fact that it is a optative and it is a whalesucker does not hold. sent16: that the owlet grades ampulla is not wrong if the coloring stumbles Cornwall. sent17: if there is something such that that it does not grade ampulla hold then the fact that the coloring does count Strix but it is not a kind of a echinocactus is not right. sent18: the hyperventilation is a optative if it is a kind of a whalesucker. sent19: if the hyperventilation is a kind of a optative it is a penciled. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coloring does not grade ampulla.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the owlet does not stumble Aethionema and it does not stumble Cornwall.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the owlet is a echinocactus.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the coloring grades ampulla.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the hyperventilation is a whalesucker.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the hyperventilation is a optative.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the hyperventilation is a kind of a penciled.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__