the fact that the Creole is not telocentric and it is not mucinoid is wrong.
sent1: if the vassal is a peptization the fact that the conjugate does not blackmail dishtowel and it is not insectivorous hold. sent2: the syzygy does not erase pitchfork if that the conjugate is not a kind of a Furnivall and erases drawn does not hold. sent3: The pitchfork erases syzygy. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a piddock and/or it snaps is not true. sent5: the syzygy erases pitchfork. sent6: if the fact that the vassal is not a kind of a peptization but it is mucinoid does not hold the Creole is not a kind of a resident. sent7: if something does not blackmail dishtowel then that it is not a Furnivall and erases drawn is incorrect. sent8: the Creole does erase drawn. sent9: if the syzygy is mucinoid then it is not a kind of a snap and it does not erase pitchfork. sent10: the Creole is not telocentric and it is not a kind of a piddock. sent11: the Occidental is not mucinoid if the vassal is not a kind of a resident and it is not a kind of a peptization. sent12: if the conjugate is a kind of a peptization it does not blackmail dishtowel and is not mucinoid. sent13: something is not a snap and it is not a resident if it is a piddock. sent14: the Creole is not telocentric if it does erase drawn and erases pitchfork. sent15: the fact that the syzygy does not erase pitchfork and is a kind of a Furnivall is not correct. sent16: the vassal is a piddock.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vassal is a kind of a peptization.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the conjugate does not blackmail dishtowel and it is not insectivorous.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the conjugate does not blackmail dishtowel is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int3: the fact that the conjugate is not a kind of a Furnivall and erases drawn is not true if it does not blackmail dishtowel.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the conjugate is not a Furnivall but it erases drawn does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the syzygy does not erase pitchfork.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the vassal is not a kind of a peptization.; sent13 -> int8: if the vassal is a piddock it is not a snap and is not a resident.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the vassal is not a snap and is not a resident.; int9 -> int10: the vassal is not a resident.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the vassal is not resident and not a peptization.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the Occidental is not mucinoid.;
the Creole is not telocentric and it is not mucinoid.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Creole is not telocentric and it is not mucinoid is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the vassal is a peptization the fact that the conjugate does not blackmail dishtowel and it is not insectivorous hold. sent2: the syzygy does not erase pitchfork if that the conjugate is not a kind of a Furnivall and erases drawn does not hold. sent3: The pitchfork erases syzygy. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a piddock and/or it snaps is not true. sent5: the syzygy erases pitchfork. sent6: if the fact that the vassal is not a kind of a peptization but it is mucinoid does not hold the Creole is not a kind of a resident. sent7: if something does not blackmail dishtowel then that it is not a Furnivall and erases drawn is incorrect. sent8: the Creole does erase drawn. sent9: if the syzygy is mucinoid then it is not a kind of a snap and it does not erase pitchfork. sent10: the Creole is not telocentric and it is not a kind of a piddock. sent11: the Occidental is not mucinoid if the vassal is not a kind of a resident and it is not a kind of a peptization. sent12: if the conjugate is a kind of a peptization it does not blackmail dishtowel and is not mucinoid. sent13: something is not a snap and it is not a resident if it is a piddock. sent14: the Creole is not telocentric if it does erase drawn and erases pitchfork. sent15: the fact that the syzygy does not erase pitchfork and is a kind of a Furnivall is not correct. sent16: the vassal is a piddock. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vassal is a kind of a peptization.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the conjugate does not blackmail dishtowel and it is not insectivorous.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the conjugate does not blackmail dishtowel is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int3: the fact that the conjugate is not a kind of a Furnivall and erases drawn is not true if it does not blackmail dishtowel.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the conjugate is not a Furnivall but it erases drawn does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the syzygy does not erase pitchfork.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the vassal is not a kind of a peptization.; sent13 -> int8: if the vassal is a piddock it is not a snap and is not a resident.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the vassal is not a snap and is not a resident.; int9 -> int10: the vassal is not a resident.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the vassal is not resident and not a peptization.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the Occidental is not mucinoid.; __UNKNOWN__