the gesticulating Canuck happens and the tinting xerography happens.
sent1: if that the beckoning dextrin occurs but the melioration does not occur is not correct the beckoning hypernatremia does not occur. sent2: if the implicitness does not occur the fact that the satyricness happens and the narration does not occur is not right. sent3: the pyroelectricity does not occur. sent4: if the Frankishness happens then the tinting xerography happens. sent5: the Frankishness is brought about by that the pyroelectricity does not occur or that the Frankishness occurs or both. sent6: the implicitness does not occur. sent7: the nearness does not occur if the fact that the satyricness but not the narration occurs is not right. sent8: that the gesticulating Canuck occurs is not false if the nearness does not occur.
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: that the satyricness but not the narration occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the nearness does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the gesticulating Canuck occurs.; sent3 -> int4: either the pyroelectricity does not occur or the Frankishness happens or both.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the Frankishness occurs.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the tinting xerography happens.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the gesticulating Canuck happens and the tinting xerography happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the beckoning dextrin occurs but the melioration does not occur is not correct the beckoning hypernatremia does not occur. sent2: if the implicitness does not occur the fact that the satyricness happens and the narration does not occur is not right. sent3: the pyroelectricity does not occur. sent4: if the Frankishness happens then the tinting xerography happens. sent5: the Frankishness is brought about by that the pyroelectricity does not occur or that the Frankishness occurs or both. sent6: the implicitness does not occur. sent7: the nearness does not occur if the fact that the satyricness but not the narration occurs is not right. sent8: that the gesticulating Canuck occurs is not false if the nearness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: that the satyricness but not the narration occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the nearness does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the gesticulating Canuck occurs.; sent3 -> int4: either the pyroelectricity does not occur or the Frankishness happens or both.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the Frankishness occurs.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the tinting xerography happens.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__