the eagle is cacodemonic.
sent1: something is not cacodemonic if that it is cacodemonic and it does not clear kelvin is not right. sent2: the fact that the scale signs Lepanto is not false. sent3: if that the eagle is not cacodemonic is right it is typographic. sent4: if the eagle does not sign Lepanto then it does not sign sandfly. sent5: if the deodorant signs deodorant the mephobarbital signs deodorant. sent6: the histologist is not a kind of a drumstick or does not accommodate or both. sent7: something that is not unnoticeable signs Lepanto and clears undernourishment. sent8: if the eagle does not clear kelvin and does not clear undernourishment then it does not sign Lepanto. sent9: something does not sign Lepanto and/or is not cacodemonic if it does not clear kelvin. sent10: if something accommodates then it does not sign deodorant and it is not unnoticeable. sent11: if the eagle does sign Lepanto that the Laurel is cacodemonic but it does not clear kelvin is incorrect. sent12: something does not clear kelvin if the fact that it does clear undernourishment and it is not unnoticeable is false. sent13: the eagle signs sandfly and it is typographic if it is not cacodemonic. sent14: the fact that the rhymer does clear undernourishment and is not unnoticeable is not true if the mephobarbital does sign deodorant. sent15: the fact that the eagle does not clear kelvin hold. sent16: if the eagle does not sign sandfly then it is argentous. sent17: there exists something such that that it is a groundhog and is a drumstick is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eagle is not cacodemonic.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the eagle does sign sandfly and is typographic.; int1 -> int2: the eagle does sign sandfly.;
the Laurel is not cacodemonic.
sent1 -> int3: if that the Laurel is cacodemonic and does not clear kelvin is incorrect then it is not cacodemonic.; sent7 -> int4: if the eagle is non-unnoticeable then it signs Lepanto and clears undernourishment.; sent10 -> int5: if the eagle does accommodate that it does not sign deodorant and is not unnoticeable is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the eagle is cacodemonic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not cacodemonic if that it is cacodemonic and it does not clear kelvin is not right. sent2: the fact that the scale signs Lepanto is not false. sent3: if that the eagle is not cacodemonic is right it is typographic. sent4: if the eagle does not sign Lepanto then it does not sign sandfly. sent5: if the deodorant signs deodorant the mephobarbital signs deodorant. sent6: the histologist is not a kind of a drumstick or does not accommodate or both. sent7: something that is not unnoticeable signs Lepanto and clears undernourishment. sent8: if the eagle does not clear kelvin and does not clear undernourishment then it does not sign Lepanto. sent9: something does not sign Lepanto and/or is not cacodemonic if it does not clear kelvin. sent10: if something accommodates then it does not sign deodorant and it is not unnoticeable. sent11: if the eagle does sign Lepanto that the Laurel is cacodemonic but it does not clear kelvin is incorrect. sent12: something does not clear kelvin if the fact that it does clear undernourishment and it is not unnoticeable is false. sent13: the eagle signs sandfly and it is typographic if it is not cacodemonic. sent14: the fact that the rhymer does clear undernourishment and is not unnoticeable is not true if the mephobarbital does sign deodorant. sent15: the fact that the eagle does not clear kelvin hold. sent16: if the eagle does not sign sandfly then it is argentous. sent17: there exists something such that that it is a groundhog and is a drumstick is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eagle is not cacodemonic.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the eagle does sign sandfly and is typographic.; int1 -> int2: the eagle does sign sandfly.; __UNKNOWN__