that that the peony is either not non-pentecostal or backless or both is not true is not wrong.
sent1: the peony is backless and/or it is a Onopordum. sent2: the nick is clinker-built if something either does slake or does value or both. sent3: the oculomotor is not a kind of a mesh. sent4: if the nick is clinker-built the Frank is a Onopordum. sent5: the doughboy is a kind of a values and/or it is a Onopordum. sent6: if the fact that the morosoph does not slake is not false the peony is pentecostal but it does not slake. sent7: that the morosoph is non-backless thing that slakes is not correct if the peony values. sent8: the doughboy is not a Onopordum but it is a mesh if the Frank is a Onopordum. sent9: the fact that the morosoph does not slake and is backless is false. sent10: if the oculomotor does bog islay the doughboy does not bog islay. sent11: if that the doughboy slakes is not incorrect then the peony does not slakes but it is a kind of a mesh. sent12: the oculomotor does bog islay. sent13: that the Frank is backless hold. sent14: the morosoph is a kind of a Onopordum but it is not a values. sent15: the fact that the oculomotor is a values that bogs islay is not right. sent16: the doughboy is not backed. sent17: if the oculomotor does bog islay that the doughboy is not a Onopordum but it is a mesh is incorrect. sent18: The islay does bog oculomotor. sent19: if the doughboy is not a mesh the morosoph does not mesh. sent20: that the peony does not value but it does slake is not true. sent21: if the nick is clinker-built the peony is not clinker-built but it does slake. sent22: the fact that the doughboy does bog islay and it is a Onopordum is not true. sent23: that the peony is not clinker-built is not false. sent24: the peony is a kind of a Onopordum or it slakes or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the morosoph does slake.; assump1 -> int1: the morosoph does slake or it is a values or both.; int1 -> int2: something does slake and/or it does value.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the nick is clinker-built.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the Frank is a kind of a Onopordum.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the doughboy is not a Onopordum and does mesh.; sent17 & sent12 -> int6: that the doughboy is not a Onopordum but a mesh is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the morosoph does not slake.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the peony is pentecostal but it does not slake.; int9 -> int10: the peony is pentecostal.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the peony is either not non-pentecostal or backless or both is not true is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the peony is backless and/or it is a Onopordum. sent2: the nick is clinker-built if something either does slake or does value or both. sent3: the oculomotor is not a kind of a mesh. sent4: if the nick is clinker-built the Frank is a Onopordum. sent5: the doughboy is a kind of a values and/or it is a Onopordum. sent6: if the fact that the morosoph does not slake is not false the peony is pentecostal but it does not slake. sent7: that the morosoph is non-backless thing that slakes is not correct if the peony values. sent8: the doughboy is not a Onopordum but it is a mesh if the Frank is a Onopordum. sent9: the fact that the morosoph does not slake and is backless is false. sent10: if the oculomotor does bog islay the doughboy does not bog islay. sent11: if that the doughboy slakes is not incorrect then the peony does not slakes but it is a kind of a mesh. sent12: the oculomotor does bog islay. sent13: that the Frank is backless hold. sent14: the morosoph is a kind of a Onopordum but it is not a values. sent15: the fact that the oculomotor is a values that bogs islay is not right. sent16: the doughboy is not backed. sent17: if the oculomotor does bog islay that the doughboy is not a Onopordum but it is a mesh is incorrect. sent18: The islay does bog oculomotor. sent19: if the doughboy is not a mesh the morosoph does not mesh. sent20: that the peony does not value but it does slake is not true. sent21: if the nick is clinker-built the peony is not clinker-built but it does slake. sent22: the fact that the doughboy does bog islay and it is a Onopordum is not true. sent23: that the peony is not clinker-built is not false. sent24: the peony is a kind of a Onopordum or it slakes or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the morosoph does slake.; assump1 -> int1: the morosoph does slake or it is a values or both.; int1 -> int2: something does slake and/or it does value.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the nick is clinker-built.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the Frank is a kind of a Onopordum.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the doughboy is not a Onopordum and does mesh.; sent17 & sent12 -> int6: that the doughboy is not a Onopordum but a mesh is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the morosoph does not slake.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the peony is pentecostal but it does not slake.; int9 -> int10: the peony is pentecostal.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__