the teff does specialize but it does not warm.
sent1: the keeper is a kind of a cachou. sent2: if something is not a petiolule then that it specializes and it is not warmed does not hold. sent3: if that the gunpowder is non-outer thing that is not a mutant does not hold the finch is a mutant. sent4: that the teff is a kind of a polemics that is not a petiolule is not right. sent5: the subsoil is warmed. sent6: if the undergraduate is a FTP the Tibetan is a cachou. sent7: the teff is a lambert. sent8: the internode is impalpable if the teff is a petiolule. sent9: that the fact that the gunpowder is not outer and is not mutant is not true is not wrong if it does silence Plattdeutsch. sent10: that the internode specializes hold if that the anglophobe is a petiolule is correct. sent11: if there exists something such that it is mutant the keeper is not a polemics and is not a kind of a last. sent12: there is something such that that it does not warm and it is a cachou does not hold. sent13: if something is impalpable or does not warm or both then it does not warm. sent14: the teff is a cachou and/or is not sympatric if there exists something such that it is a kind of a cachou. sent15: that the bodywork either is a Fiedler or slaloms or both does not hold. sent16: something is non-last thing that is not a polemics. sent17: that the teff does specialize if the internode does specialize is true. sent18: if the internode is impalpable the fact that the anglophobe does not last and is not a polemics is incorrect. sent19: something is impalpable if it is a cachou. sent20: the gunpowder does silence Plattdeutsch. sent21: the anglophobe is a petiolule if there is something such that it is not a polemics and it is not last. sent22: the keeper is not a cachou if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a last and it is not a polemics does not hold. sent23: if there exists something such that that it is a Fiedler and/or it slaloms is not true that the undergraduate is a FTP hold. sent24: the keeper is not a cachou if there are last things.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the teff is a petiolule is right.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the internode is impalpable.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: that the anglophobe is not a kind of a last and it is not a polemics is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a last and is not a polemics does not hold.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the keeper is not a cachou.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the teff is not a petiolule.; sent2 -> int7: if the teff is not a kind of a petiolule that it specializes and is not warmed does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the teff specializes and is not warmed.
sent9 & sent20 -> int8: the fact that the gunpowder is not outer and it is not a mutant is wrong.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the finch is a mutant.; int9 -> int10: something is a mutant.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the keeper is not a polemics and it does not last.; int11 -> int12: something is not a polemics and does not last.; int12 & sent21 -> int13: the anglophobe is a petiolule.; sent10 & int13 -> int14: the internode does specialize.; sent17 & int14 -> int15: the teff does specialize.; sent13 -> int16: if the teff is impalpable or it is not warmed or both then it is not warmed.; sent15 -> int17: there is something such that that it is a Fiedler and/or it is a kind of a slalom is false.; int17 & sent23 -> int18: the undergraduate FTPS.; sent6 & int18 -> int19: the Tibetan is a cachou.; int19 -> int20: something is a cachou.; int20 & sent14 -> int21: the teff either is a kind of a cachou or is not sympatric or both.; sent19 -> int22: if the teff is a kind of a cachou then it is impalpable.;
$hypothesis$ = the teff does specialize but it does not warm. ; $context$ = sent1: the keeper is a kind of a cachou. sent2: if something is not a petiolule then that it specializes and it is not warmed does not hold. sent3: if that the gunpowder is non-outer thing that is not a mutant does not hold the finch is a mutant. sent4: that the teff is a kind of a polemics that is not a petiolule is not right. sent5: the subsoil is warmed. sent6: if the undergraduate is a FTP the Tibetan is a cachou. sent7: the teff is a lambert. sent8: the internode is impalpable if the teff is a petiolule. sent9: that the fact that the gunpowder is not outer and is not mutant is not true is not wrong if it does silence Plattdeutsch. sent10: that the internode specializes hold if that the anglophobe is a petiolule is correct. sent11: if there exists something such that it is mutant the keeper is not a polemics and is not a kind of a last. sent12: there is something such that that it does not warm and it is a cachou does not hold. sent13: if something is impalpable or does not warm or both then it does not warm. sent14: the teff is a cachou and/or is not sympatric if there exists something such that it is a kind of a cachou. sent15: that the bodywork either is a Fiedler or slaloms or both does not hold. sent16: something is non-last thing that is not a polemics. sent17: that the teff does specialize if the internode does specialize is true. sent18: if the internode is impalpable the fact that the anglophobe does not last and is not a polemics is incorrect. sent19: something is impalpable if it is a cachou. sent20: the gunpowder does silence Plattdeutsch. sent21: the anglophobe is a petiolule if there is something such that it is not a polemics and it is not last. sent22: the keeper is not a cachou if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a last and it is not a polemics does not hold. sent23: if there exists something such that that it is a Fiedler and/or it slaloms is not true that the undergraduate is a FTP hold. sent24: the keeper is not a cachou if there are last things. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the teff is a petiolule is right.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the internode is impalpable.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: that the anglophobe is not a kind of a last and it is not a polemics is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a last and is not a polemics does not hold.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the keeper is not a cachou.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the teff is not a petiolule.; sent2 -> int7: if the teff is not a kind of a petiolule that it specializes and is not warmed does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__