the briarwood is not subtractive.
sent1: the upset is a scabbard if that it is a kind of a Lateran that is not a scabbard is false. sent2: the transparency is not a kind of a contaminant if the fact that the lavatory is both not a terce and a contaminant is not correct. sent3: if that the upset is not chiromantic but it is a Horus is incorrect then the lavatory is not a Horus. sent4: something that is cytotoxic and/or not a muff does not drape dumping. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is empyreal but not a Crusader is wrong the transparency is not a headed. sent6: that the upset is non-chiromantic and a Horus is not correct if it is a scabbard. sent7: the griddlecake is not a muff and/or it does not sophisticate fancier. sent8: the jodhpur either is a headed or is not phonics or both. sent9: if something does not drape dumping then either it does not seel or it is not a headed or both. sent10: if the griddlecake is not a muff and it does not drape dumping the briarwood is a muff. sent11: that something is not a kind of a terce but it is a contaminant is incorrect if it is not a Horus. sent12: the fact that the upset is both a Lateran and not a scabbard is not correct. sent13: the griddlecake is not megaloblastic if the fact that it is cytotoxic or it is not a muff or both is false. sent14: the griddlecake is a contaminant. sent15: there exists something such that that it is empyreal and it is not a kind of a Crusader is wrong. sent16: if the griddlecake does not seel and/or it is not a headed then the briarwood is subtractive. sent17: that something is megaloblastic thing that does drape dumping is false if it does not seel. sent18: that the griddlecake is megaloblastic hold if it is a contaminant. sent19: the fact that something does not seel and is megaloblastic does not hold if it does not head.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the griddlecake is cytotoxic or it does not muff or both is incorrect.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the griddlecake is non-megaloblastic is not incorrect.; sent18 & sent14 -> int2: the griddlecake is megaloblastic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: either the griddlecake is cytotoxic or it is not a kind of a muff or both.; sent4 -> int5: the griddlecake does not drape dumping if it either is cytotoxic or does not muff or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the griddlecake does not drape dumping.; sent9 -> int7: if the griddlecake does not drape dumping then it does not seel or it is not a kind of a headed or both.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the griddlecake does not seel or it is not a headed or both.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the briarwood does muff.
sent19 -> int9: if the lavatory does not head then that it does not seel and it is megaloblastic is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the briarwood is not subtractive. ; $context$ = sent1: the upset is a scabbard if that it is a kind of a Lateran that is not a scabbard is false. sent2: the transparency is not a kind of a contaminant if the fact that the lavatory is both not a terce and a contaminant is not correct. sent3: if that the upset is not chiromantic but it is a Horus is incorrect then the lavatory is not a Horus. sent4: something that is cytotoxic and/or not a muff does not drape dumping. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is empyreal but not a Crusader is wrong the transparency is not a headed. sent6: that the upset is non-chiromantic and a Horus is not correct if it is a scabbard. sent7: the griddlecake is not a muff and/or it does not sophisticate fancier. sent8: the jodhpur either is a headed or is not phonics or both. sent9: if something does not drape dumping then either it does not seel or it is not a headed or both. sent10: if the griddlecake is not a muff and it does not drape dumping the briarwood is a muff. sent11: that something is not a kind of a terce but it is a contaminant is incorrect if it is not a Horus. sent12: the fact that the upset is both a Lateran and not a scabbard is not correct. sent13: the griddlecake is not megaloblastic if the fact that it is cytotoxic or it is not a muff or both is false. sent14: the griddlecake is a contaminant. sent15: there exists something such that that it is empyreal and it is not a kind of a Crusader is wrong. sent16: if the griddlecake does not seel and/or it is not a headed then the briarwood is subtractive. sent17: that something is megaloblastic thing that does drape dumping is false if it does not seel. sent18: that the griddlecake is megaloblastic hold if it is a contaminant. sent19: the fact that something does not seel and is megaloblastic does not hold if it does not head. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the griddlecake is cytotoxic or it does not muff or both is incorrect.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the griddlecake is non-megaloblastic is not incorrect.; sent18 & sent14 -> int2: the griddlecake is megaloblastic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: either the griddlecake is cytotoxic or it is not a kind of a muff or both.; sent4 -> int5: the griddlecake does not drape dumping if it either is cytotoxic or does not muff or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the griddlecake does not drape dumping.; sent9 -> int7: if the griddlecake does not drape dumping then it does not seel or it is not a kind of a headed or both.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the griddlecake does not seel or it is not a headed or both.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__