the plainclothesman does not rib chit or it is not intertribal or both.
sent1: the marlinespike does not rib wording if there exists something such that that it rib wording and it is not imperative does not hold. sent2: if the marlinespike does not rib chit the express is a kind of a Sardinian. sent3: something is not intertribal if it is Sardinian and it is a straight-arm. sent4: if the marlinespike is a kind of a brawl then the express is a Sardinian. sent5: if that something is a tracheostomy and is not a kind of a monetization is false it is a kind of a straight-arm. sent6: that the bourbon does rib wording and is not a kind of an imperative is not true. sent7: the facial is not a Sardinian if it is a kind of a tracheostomy and it is not a monetization. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a brawl that that the plainclothesman does not rib chit or it is non-intertribal or both is wrong is not false. sent9: that the facial is both a Sardinian and iritic is not false. sent10: the marlinespike does not brawl if the fact that the facial gates Oleandraceae and/or it is a straight-arm is right. sent11: either the marlinespike is a brawl or it does not rib chit or both if it does not rib wording.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the facial is a kind of a tracheostomy and is not a monetization.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the facial is not a kind of a Sardinian.; sent9 -> int2: the facial is a Sardinian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the facial is a tracheostomy but it is not a monetization is not right is correct.; sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the facial is a tracheostomy and not a monetization is wrong it is a straight-arm.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the facial is a straight-arm.; int6 -> int7: the facial gates Oleandraceae or it is a straight-arm or both.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: that the marlinespike does not brawl hold.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a brawl.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the express is non-intertribal.
sent3 -> int10: if the express is both Sardinian and a straight-arm it is not intertribal.; sent6 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it does rib wording and it is not imperative is incorrect.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the marlinespike does not rib wording.; sent11 & int12 -> int13: the marlinespike does brawl and/or it does not rib chit.; int13 & sent4 & sent2 -> int14: the fact that the express is a Sardinian is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the plainclothesman does not rib chit or it is not intertribal or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the marlinespike does not rib wording if there exists something such that that it rib wording and it is not imperative does not hold. sent2: if the marlinespike does not rib chit the express is a kind of a Sardinian. sent3: something is not intertribal if it is Sardinian and it is a straight-arm. sent4: if the marlinespike is a kind of a brawl then the express is a Sardinian. sent5: if that something is a tracheostomy and is not a kind of a monetization is false it is a kind of a straight-arm. sent6: that the bourbon does rib wording and is not a kind of an imperative is not true. sent7: the facial is not a Sardinian if it is a kind of a tracheostomy and it is not a monetization. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a brawl that that the plainclothesman does not rib chit or it is non-intertribal or both is wrong is not false. sent9: that the facial is both a Sardinian and iritic is not false. sent10: the marlinespike does not brawl if the fact that the facial gates Oleandraceae and/or it is a straight-arm is right. sent11: either the marlinespike is a brawl or it does not rib chit or both if it does not rib wording. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the facial is a kind of a tracheostomy and is not a monetization.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the facial is not a kind of a Sardinian.; sent9 -> int2: the facial is a Sardinian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the facial is a tracheostomy but it is not a monetization is not right is correct.; sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the facial is a tracheostomy and not a monetization is wrong it is a straight-arm.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the facial is a straight-arm.; int6 -> int7: the facial gates Oleandraceae or it is a straight-arm or both.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: that the marlinespike does not brawl hold.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a brawl.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__