that the wall is autolytic and does down rudderpost is not true.
sent1: the zinc is not a fencer if the fact that the fact that the brand does not photosensitize bayat and does not down Jacob is not false is not right. sent2: the wall does photosensitize schwa if somethings do not photosensitize bayat and does not down Jacob. sent3: if the zinc is not a fencer then that the felucca is not a kind of a unevenness is not incorrect. sent4: the T-man is not a Conospermum. sent5: something is autolytic if it photosensitizes schwa. sent6: everything is a kind of a unevenness and it is a kind of a wassailer. sent7: the wall downs rudderpost and is rabbinical if the T-man is not a Conospermum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the brand does not photosensitize bayat and does not down Jacob is wrong.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the zinc is not a fencer is not false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the felucca is not a kind of a unevenness.; sent6 -> int3: the felucca is a unevenness and it is a wassailer.; int3 -> int4: the felucca is a unevenness.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the brand does not photosensitize bayat and does not down Jacob.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not photosensitize bayat and it does not down Jacob.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the wall does photosensitize schwa.; sent5 -> int9: if the wall does photosensitize schwa then it is autolytic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the wall is autolytic is correct.; sent7 & sent4 -> int11: the wall does down rudderpost and is rabbinical.; int11 -> int12: the wall downs rudderpost.; int10 & int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the wall is autolytic and does down rudderpost is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the zinc is not a fencer if the fact that the fact that the brand does not photosensitize bayat and does not down Jacob is not false is not right. sent2: the wall does photosensitize schwa if somethings do not photosensitize bayat and does not down Jacob. sent3: if the zinc is not a fencer then that the felucca is not a kind of a unevenness is not incorrect. sent4: the T-man is not a Conospermum. sent5: something is autolytic if it photosensitizes schwa. sent6: everything is a kind of a unevenness and it is a kind of a wassailer. sent7: the wall downs rudderpost and is rabbinical if the T-man is not a Conospermum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the brand does not photosensitize bayat and does not down Jacob is wrong.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the zinc is not a fencer is not false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the felucca is not a kind of a unevenness.; sent6 -> int3: the felucca is a unevenness and it is a wassailer.; int3 -> int4: the felucca is a unevenness.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the brand does not photosensitize bayat and does not down Jacob.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not photosensitize bayat and it does not down Jacob.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the wall does photosensitize schwa.; sent5 -> int9: if the wall does photosensitize schwa then it is autolytic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the wall is autolytic is correct.; sent7 & sent4 -> int11: the wall does down rudderpost and is rabbinical.; int11 -> int12: the wall downs rudderpost.; int10 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__