that the circulation is prevented by that the culinariness does not occur is false.
sent1: if the marrying does not occur the starting lampshade and the conflict happens. sent2: if that the whiz occurs is right that the biosystematicsness occurs and the eolithicness does not occur is wrong. sent3: if the fact that the fraternization happens and the enfeoffing curry occurs is incorrect then the ritualness does not occur. sent4: that the lengthwiseness occurs is not false. sent5: that the ritual does not occur results in that the circulation occurs or the culinariness occurs or both. sent6: if the circulation occurs then the culinariness occurs. sent7: that the cautery occurs is wrong. sent8: that the culinariness occurs causes that the circulation does not occur. sent9: that the whiz occurs and the biologisticness occurs is triggered by that the vroom does not occur. sent10: if the littering does not occur that the fraternization happens and the enfeoffing curry occurs does not hold. sent11: that both the non-cinematicness and the Pacificness occurs is triggered by that the starting lampshade happens. sent12: the demonstration occurs. sent13: the litter does not occur if that the biosystematicsness but not the eolithicness happens is not correct. sent14: if the Pacificness happens not the vroom but the institutionalness occurs. sent15: the circulation happens if the culinariness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the circulation occurs.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the culinariness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the culinariness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the circulation does not occur is correct.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the dissipating occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the circulation is prevented by that the culinariness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the marrying does not occur the starting lampshade and the conflict happens. sent2: if that the whiz occurs is right that the biosystematicsness occurs and the eolithicness does not occur is wrong. sent3: if the fact that the fraternization happens and the enfeoffing curry occurs is incorrect then the ritualness does not occur. sent4: that the lengthwiseness occurs is not false. sent5: that the ritual does not occur results in that the circulation occurs or the culinariness occurs or both. sent6: if the circulation occurs then the culinariness occurs. sent7: that the cautery occurs is wrong. sent8: that the culinariness occurs causes that the circulation does not occur. sent9: that the whiz occurs and the biologisticness occurs is triggered by that the vroom does not occur. sent10: if the littering does not occur that the fraternization happens and the enfeoffing curry occurs does not hold. sent11: that both the non-cinematicness and the Pacificness occurs is triggered by that the starting lampshade happens. sent12: the demonstration occurs. sent13: the litter does not occur if that the biosystematicsness but not the eolithicness happens is not correct. sent14: if the Pacificness happens not the vroom but the institutionalness occurs. sent15: the circulation happens if the culinariness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the circulation occurs.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the culinariness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the culinariness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the circulation does not occur is correct.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__