the cling is salient.
sent1: the fact that the swindler phrases is correct if there exists something such that that it is not a deterrence and does not cocoon is incorrect. sent2: if there is something such that it is not nosohusial then the fact that the petrel is a deterrence but it does not cocoon is not true. sent3: the petrel is pyrogallic. sent4: the envelope is not nosohusial if it outshouts territoriality. sent5: if something is a deterrence then the swindler is a phrase. sent6: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a deterrence and is a kind of a cocoon is not right. sent7: if there is something such that that it does not cocoon and is not a deterrence is not right the petrel does phrase. sent8: the cling is a alligatorfish and it is nosohusial if the envelope is not a deterrence. sent9: if either the envelope outshouts territoriality or it is a alligatorfish or both it is not nosohusial. sent10: the fact that the petrel is a deterrence and does not cocoon is not true. sent11: if the petrel is not a cocoon then that it does not phrase or is a deterrence or both is false. sent12: that the petrel is not a deterrence and not a cocoon is wrong if there are non-nosohusial things. sent13: the jaeger is a alligatorfish. sent14: if something is a alligatorfish and/or it outshouts territoriality then it is not a kind of a salient. sent15: the envelope is a alligatorfish. sent16: something is not a deterrence and it is not a cocoon. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not salient and not a deterrence does not hold then the swindler is a kind of a phrase. sent18: that that the petrel does not outshout territoriality and is not a deterrence is not correct hold. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is nosohusial is not wrong. sent20: if that the petrel is not a phrase and/or it is a deterrence does not hold then the envelope is not a deterrence. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is a deterrence and it is not a cocoon is false.
sent15 -> int1: the envelope outshouts territoriality and/or is a alligatorfish.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the envelope is not nosohusial.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not nosohusial.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the petrel is not a deterrence and is not a kind of a cocoon does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is not a deterrence and is not a cocoon is not true.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the swindler is a kind of a phrase.;
the cling is not salient.
sent14 -> int7: the cling is not a salient if either it is a alligatorfish or it does outshout territoriality or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the cling is salient. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the swindler phrases is correct if there exists something such that that it is not a deterrence and does not cocoon is incorrect. sent2: if there is something such that it is not nosohusial then the fact that the petrel is a deterrence but it does not cocoon is not true. sent3: the petrel is pyrogallic. sent4: the envelope is not nosohusial if it outshouts territoriality. sent5: if something is a deterrence then the swindler is a phrase. sent6: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a deterrence and is a kind of a cocoon is not right. sent7: if there is something such that that it does not cocoon and is not a deterrence is not right the petrel does phrase. sent8: the cling is a alligatorfish and it is nosohusial if the envelope is not a deterrence. sent9: if either the envelope outshouts territoriality or it is a alligatorfish or both it is not nosohusial. sent10: the fact that the petrel is a deterrence and does not cocoon is not true. sent11: if the petrel is not a cocoon then that it does not phrase or is a deterrence or both is false. sent12: that the petrel is not a deterrence and not a cocoon is wrong if there are non-nosohusial things. sent13: the jaeger is a alligatorfish. sent14: if something is a alligatorfish and/or it outshouts territoriality then it is not a kind of a salient. sent15: the envelope is a alligatorfish. sent16: something is not a deterrence and it is not a cocoon. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not salient and not a deterrence does not hold then the swindler is a kind of a phrase. sent18: that that the petrel does not outshout territoriality and is not a deterrence is not correct hold. sent19: there exists something such that the fact that it is nosohusial is not wrong. sent20: if that the petrel is not a phrase and/or it is a deterrence does not hold then the envelope is not a deterrence. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is a deterrence and it is not a cocoon is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the envelope outshouts territoriality and/or is a alligatorfish.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the envelope is not nosohusial.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not nosohusial.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the petrel is not a deterrence and is not a kind of a cocoon does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is not a deterrence and is not a cocoon is not true.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the swindler is a kind of a phrase.; __UNKNOWN__