the ascospore either is not a larvacide or is an ordinary or both.
sent1: that the outerwear is not a ceremoniousness but it is extramural does not hold if there exists something such that it is a Turnicidae. sent2: the outerwear is not a ceremoniousness and is extramural if it is not saxicolous. sent3: the outerwear is not saxicolous. sent4: the fact that the ascospore is not a larvacide and/or it is ordinary is not correct if there exists something such that it does rival morphophoneme. sent5: if the pegmatite is bracteate and/or it is not ambulatory then the bodega does rival morphophoneme. sent6: that the outerwear is a ceremoniousness and extramural does not hold. sent7: if the dudeen is not a kind of a Turnicidae the pegmatite is not ambulatory.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dudeen is a Turnicidae.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a kind of a Turnicidae.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the outerwear is not a ceremoniousness but extramural is right does not hold.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the outerwear is not a kind of a ceremoniousness but it is extramural.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the dudeen is not a kind of a Turnicidae.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the pegmatite is not an ambulatory.; int6 -> int7: the pegmatite is bracteate and/or is non-ambulatory.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the bodega does rival morphophoneme.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it does rival morphophoneme.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the ascospore either is not a larvacide or is an ordinary or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the outerwear is not a ceremoniousness but it is extramural does not hold if there exists something such that it is a Turnicidae. sent2: the outerwear is not a ceremoniousness and is extramural if it is not saxicolous. sent3: the outerwear is not saxicolous. sent4: the fact that the ascospore is not a larvacide and/or it is ordinary is not correct if there exists something such that it does rival morphophoneme. sent5: if the pegmatite is bracteate and/or it is not ambulatory then the bodega does rival morphophoneme. sent6: that the outerwear is a ceremoniousness and extramural does not hold. sent7: if the dudeen is not a kind of a Turnicidae the pegmatite is not ambulatory. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dudeen is a Turnicidae.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a kind of a Turnicidae.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the outerwear is not a ceremoniousness but extramural is right does not hold.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the outerwear is not a kind of a ceremoniousness but it is extramural.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the dudeen is not a kind of a Turnicidae.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the pegmatite is not an ambulatory.; int6 -> int7: the pegmatite is bracteate and/or is non-ambulatory.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the bodega does rival morphophoneme.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it does rival morphophoneme.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__