there is something such that if that it is a kind of a reasoning and is not insurrectional is not true it is not a postdoctoral.
sent1: if the fact that the stain is a reasoning and it is insurrectional does not hold it is not a postdoctoral. sent2: if the stain is not insurrectional then that it is not shrubby is true. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a quiddity and it is not a Polk is wrong it is not a kind of a hurdy-gurdy. sent4: if that the crooner is nasopharyngeal and is not macrobiotic is false then it is a postdoctoral. sent5: there is something such that if it is a reasoning that is not insurrectional it is not postdoctoral. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a reasoning it is not a postdoctoral. sent7: something is not a masterstroke if the fact that it does carol oka and does not program sanatorium is incorrect. sent8: the stain is not a postdoctoral if the fact that it is a reasoning that is not insurrectional is incorrect. sent9: there is something such that if that it reasons and is not insurrectional does not hold then it is not non-postdoctoral. sent10: that the stain is not a postdoctoral is not false if it does not reason. sent11: the stain does not carol megabat if the fact that it is insurrectional and it does not cope lesion is not right. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a putrescine then it is not a kind of a hydroflumethiazide. sent13: that the stain is not postdoctoral is not incorrect if that it reasons and it is not insurrectional hold. sent14: if that the stain is a giblet and does not lurch lesion is not correct that it is not insurrectional is not incorrect. sent15: if that the stain is a kind of a reasoning but it is not insurrectional does not hold then it is a postdoctoral. sent16: there is something such that if it is insurrectional it is not a postdoctoral. sent17: there is something such that if that it is a kind of biflagellate thing that is a flexure is false it does not escalate. sent18: something is not a centriole if that it is extricable and it is not aeronautical is not correct. sent19: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a hadrosaur that does not disincarnate does not hold then it is not a cytoskeleton. sent20: the stain is not insurrectional if that it does escalate and is a hurdy-gurdy is not right. sent21: there is something such that if that it is a reasoning and it is insurrectional is not true then it is not postdoctoral.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that the fact that it carols oka and does not program sanatorium hold is not correct then it is not a masterstroke.
sent7 -> int1: if that the megabat carols oka and does not program sanatorium does not hold it is not a masterstroke.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a kind of a reasoning and is not insurrectional is not true it is not a postdoctoral. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the stain is a reasoning and it is insurrectional does not hold it is not a postdoctoral. sent2: if the stain is not insurrectional then that it is not shrubby is true. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a quiddity and it is not a Polk is wrong it is not a kind of a hurdy-gurdy. sent4: if that the crooner is nasopharyngeal and is not macrobiotic is false then it is a postdoctoral. sent5: there is something such that if it is a reasoning that is not insurrectional it is not postdoctoral. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a reasoning it is not a postdoctoral. sent7: something is not a masterstroke if the fact that it does carol oka and does not program sanatorium is incorrect. sent8: the stain is not a postdoctoral if the fact that it is a reasoning that is not insurrectional is incorrect. sent9: there is something such that if that it reasons and is not insurrectional does not hold then it is not non-postdoctoral. sent10: that the stain is not a postdoctoral is not false if it does not reason. sent11: the stain does not carol megabat if the fact that it is insurrectional and it does not cope lesion is not right. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a putrescine then it is not a kind of a hydroflumethiazide. sent13: that the stain is not postdoctoral is not incorrect if that it reasons and it is not insurrectional hold. sent14: if that the stain is a giblet and does not lurch lesion is not correct that it is not insurrectional is not incorrect. sent15: if that the stain is a kind of a reasoning but it is not insurrectional does not hold then it is a postdoctoral. sent16: there is something such that if it is insurrectional it is not a postdoctoral. sent17: there is something such that if that it is a kind of biflagellate thing that is a flexure is false it does not escalate. sent18: something is not a centriole if that it is extricable and it is not aeronautical is not correct. sent19: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a hadrosaur that does not disincarnate does not hold then it is not a cytoskeleton. sent20: the stain is not insurrectional if that it does escalate and is a hurdy-gurdy is not right. sent21: there is something such that if that it is a reasoning and it is insurrectional is not true then it is not postdoctoral. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__