something is not raptorial.
sent1: the sacrum is not a kind of a Ekman if the fact that it is a kind of a Rajidae is right. sent2: the proprionamide is a kind of a Ekman if a raptorial thing is a Rajidae. sent3: something is not a kind of a Rajidae. sent4: there exists something such that that it does unmake quintet is not false. sent5: the proprionamide sibilates. sent6: the fact that something does not unmake quintet and is not a Rajidae does not hold if it does not sibilate. sent7: there exists something such that it does not unmake monotheism. sent8: the proprionamide is not raptorial if the fact that it is not a Ekman hold. sent9: the fact that the sacrum is a kind of a Rajidae that is a Ekman does not hold. sent10: the fact that the sacrum does unmake quintet and does defibrillate limbers is not correct. sent11: the pork is not a kind of a khesari. sent12: something is raptorial. sent13: something is a Ekman and a Rajidae. sent14: if the fact that that the proprionamide is not a Rajidae and is a Ekman is not right is correct it is not raptorial. sent15: something sibilates. sent16: something is raptorial and it sibilates if it does not unmake quintet. sent17: something does sibilate and does unmake quintet. sent18: the bunsen is not a Rhynia if it is cosmologic. sent19: that the proprionamide is not a Rajidae but it is a Ekman is wrong if the sacrum is a kind of a Rajidae. sent20: that that the sacrum is not a kind of a Rajidae but it is a Ekman is incorrect is not wrong if the proprionamide is a Rajidae.
that the acrylamide is raptorial is not false.
sent16 -> int1: if that the acrylamide does not unmake quintet is correct it is raptorial and sibilates.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not raptorial. ; $context$ = sent1: the sacrum is not a kind of a Ekman if the fact that it is a kind of a Rajidae is right. sent2: the proprionamide is a kind of a Ekman if a raptorial thing is a Rajidae. sent3: something is not a kind of a Rajidae. sent4: there exists something such that that it does unmake quintet is not false. sent5: the proprionamide sibilates. sent6: the fact that something does not unmake quintet and is not a Rajidae does not hold if it does not sibilate. sent7: there exists something such that it does not unmake monotheism. sent8: the proprionamide is not raptorial if the fact that it is not a Ekman hold. sent9: the fact that the sacrum is a kind of a Rajidae that is a Ekman does not hold. sent10: the fact that the sacrum does unmake quintet and does defibrillate limbers is not correct. sent11: the pork is not a kind of a khesari. sent12: something is raptorial. sent13: something is a Ekman and a Rajidae. sent14: if the fact that that the proprionamide is not a Rajidae and is a Ekman is not right is correct it is not raptorial. sent15: something sibilates. sent16: something is raptorial and it sibilates if it does not unmake quintet. sent17: something does sibilate and does unmake quintet. sent18: the bunsen is not a Rhynia if it is cosmologic. sent19: that the proprionamide is not a Rajidae but it is a Ekman is wrong if the sacrum is a kind of a Rajidae. sent20: that that the sacrum is not a kind of a Rajidae but it is a Ekman is incorrect is not wrong if the proprionamide is a Rajidae. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__