the fact that that either the TKO does not occur or the grouping Adar happens or both does not hold if the fact that the whitelash occurs hold does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the whitelash does not occur but the untuning capitation occurs is false if the TKO occurs. sent2: that the whitelash and the untuning capitation occurs prevents that the coexisting happens. sent3: that that either the TKO or the grouping Adar or both occurs does not hold is true. sent4: the coexisting and the debarring tolazoline happens. sent5: that either the tunefulness or the natalness or both occurs is false if the untuning gramicidin occurs. sent6: if the grouping Adar happens then the TKO happens. sent7: if the untuning capitation does not occur then the fact that the TKO does not occur or the grouping Adar occurs or both is false. sent8: either the TKO does not occur or the grouping Adar occurs or both if the whitelash happens. sent9: both the Napoleonicness and the hitch occurs. sent10: if the desecrating Isaac does not occur that the untuning establishment does not occur and/or the lucifugousness occurs is not true. sent11: that the untuning capitation does not occur brings about that the grouping Adar does not occur. sent12: the desecrating cusk-eel happens if the fact that not the whitelash but the untuning capitation happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whitelash happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the untuning capitation happens is correct.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the whitelash and the untuning capitation happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the coexisting does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the coexisting occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the untuning capitation does not occur.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the TKO does not occur or the grouping Adar happens or both is not correct.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the desecrating cusk-eel and the azoticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that either the TKO does not occur or the grouping Adar happens or both does not hold if the fact that the whitelash occurs hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the whitelash does not occur but the untuning capitation occurs is false if the TKO occurs. sent2: that the whitelash and the untuning capitation occurs prevents that the coexisting happens. sent3: that that either the TKO or the grouping Adar or both occurs does not hold is true. sent4: the coexisting and the debarring tolazoline happens. sent5: that either the tunefulness or the natalness or both occurs is false if the untuning gramicidin occurs. sent6: if the grouping Adar happens then the TKO happens. sent7: if the untuning capitation does not occur then the fact that the TKO does not occur or the grouping Adar occurs or both is false. sent8: either the TKO does not occur or the grouping Adar occurs or both if the whitelash happens. sent9: both the Napoleonicness and the hitch occurs. sent10: if the desecrating Isaac does not occur that the untuning establishment does not occur and/or the lucifugousness occurs is not true. sent11: that the untuning capitation does not occur brings about that the grouping Adar does not occur. sent12: the desecrating cusk-eel happens if the fact that not the whitelash but the untuning capitation happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whitelash happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the untuning capitation happens is correct.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the whitelash and the untuning capitation happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the coexisting does not occur.; sent4 -> int3: the coexisting occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the untuning capitation does not occur.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the TKO does not occur or the grouping Adar happens or both is not correct.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__