if the unequalness does not occur the anticlinalness happens or the trachealness happens or both.
sent1: that the rent does not occur triggers either the extinguishing inwardness or that the wintriness happens or both. sent2: that the counterpunch occurs and the aeration does not occur prevents that the Taiwaneseness does not occur. sent3: that the trachealness and/or the extinguishing treatment occurs is caused by that the unbrokenness does not occur. sent4: the non-vestalness is triggered by the adequateness. sent5: the vestalness does not occur. sent6: that the droning regimented occurs and the vestalness occurs brings about the anticlinalness. sent7: if the unequalness does not occur then the droning regimented but not the vestal happens. sent8: both the droning regimented and the non-vestalness happens if the unequalness happens. sent9: the unrepeatableness but not the gemination occurs if the frail does not occur. sent10: the anticlinalness occurs and/or the trachealness occurs if the unequalness occurs. sent11: if the droning regimented but not the vestal occurs then the fact that the anticlinalness happens hold. sent12: the extinguishing Secale does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unequalness does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the droning regimented and the non-vestalness happens.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the anticlinalness happens.; int2 -> int3: either the anticlinalness or the trachealness or both occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the contributing protectorship happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the unequalness does not occur the anticlinalness happens or the trachealness happens or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the rent does not occur triggers either the extinguishing inwardness or that the wintriness happens or both. sent2: that the counterpunch occurs and the aeration does not occur prevents that the Taiwaneseness does not occur. sent3: that the trachealness and/or the extinguishing treatment occurs is caused by that the unbrokenness does not occur. sent4: the non-vestalness is triggered by the adequateness. sent5: the vestalness does not occur. sent6: that the droning regimented occurs and the vestalness occurs brings about the anticlinalness. sent7: if the unequalness does not occur then the droning regimented but not the vestal happens. sent8: both the droning regimented and the non-vestalness happens if the unequalness happens. sent9: the unrepeatableness but not the gemination occurs if the frail does not occur. sent10: the anticlinalness occurs and/or the trachealness occurs if the unequalness occurs. sent11: if the droning regimented but not the vestal occurs then the fact that the anticlinalness happens hold. sent12: the extinguishing Secale does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unequalness does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the droning regimented and the non-vestalness happens.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the anticlinalness happens.; int2 -> int3: either the anticlinalness or the trachealness or both occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__