the feedlot is not dithyrambic.
sent1: if that the fact that the feedlot obeys facula but it is not a dash-pot hold does not hold the fact that the cryptomonad does not obeys facula is not incorrect. sent2: the feedlot is dithyrambic if the outlier is dithyrambic. sent3: the feedlot is a dazzled. sent4: the feedlot is not an acuity if that it does not premise Lycaeon and it is a Ascension does not hold. sent5: the episome is dithyrambic. sent6: the fact that something is not dithyrambic and does not obey facula is false if it is not a dazzled. sent7: something that is not a kind of a dash-pot does not dazzle and is dithyrambic. sent8: that the outlier is not a Ascension is not incorrect if that the littoral is not unscholarly and it does not premise Lycaeon is incorrect. sent9: the feedlot does not clangor docking if it is micrometeoritic and is Andean. sent10: The facula does obey feedlot. sent11: the feedlot does not eliminate. sent12: if that the cosmid does decoy and it dazzles is right then it is not a fourth. sent13: if something is not a kind of an acuity then that it does obey facula and is not a dash-pot does not hold. sent14: if the outlier is not a Ascension the fact that it is an acuity and a dash-pot does not hold. sent15: the feedlot does obey facula. sent16: if something does not obey facula it is dithyrambic and a dazzled. sent17: the fact that if that the outlier does not shrive hold the outlier is not unscholarly is correct.
sent3 & sent15 -> int1: the feedlot is a kind of a dazzled that does obey facula.;
the cryptomonad is dithyrambic.
sent16 -> int2: if the fact that the cryptomonad does not obey facula is not false it is dithyrambic and it does dazzle.; sent13 -> int3: if the feedlot is not an acuity that it obeys facula and is not a dash-pot is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the feedlot is not dithyrambic. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the fact that the feedlot obeys facula but it is not a dash-pot hold does not hold the fact that the cryptomonad does not obeys facula is not incorrect. sent2: the feedlot is dithyrambic if the outlier is dithyrambic. sent3: the feedlot is a dazzled. sent4: the feedlot is not an acuity if that it does not premise Lycaeon and it is a Ascension does not hold. sent5: the episome is dithyrambic. sent6: the fact that something is not dithyrambic and does not obey facula is false if it is not a dazzled. sent7: something that is not a kind of a dash-pot does not dazzle and is dithyrambic. sent8: that the outlier is not a Ascension is not incorrect if that the littoral is not unscholarly and it does not premise Lycaeon is incorrect. sent9: the feedlot does not clangor docking if it is micrometeoritic and is Andean. sent10: The facula does obey feedlot. sent11: the feedlot does not eliminate. sent12: if that the cosmid does decoy and it dazzles is right then it is not a fourth. sent13: if something is not a kind of an acuity then that it does obey facula and is not a dash-pot does not hold. sent14: if the outlier is not a Ascension the fact that it is an acuity and a dash-pot does not hold. sent15: the feedlot does obey facula. sent16: if something does not obey facula it is dithyrambic and a dazzled. sent17: the fact that if that the outlier does not shrive hold the outlier is not unscholarly is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent15 -> int1: the feedlot is a kind of a dazzled that does obey facula.; __UNKNOWN__