the taxableness does not occur.
sent1: if the humanistness happens then that the taxableness happens is not incorrect. sent2: not the actinomorphicness but the katharobicness happens. sent3: the reopening chatroom does not occur. sent4: if the exporting does not occur then the concerning interim happens. sent5: the expensing Garrison does not occur but the getting occurs if that the reopening chatroom does not occur is correct. sent6: that the revision does not occur or the cocooning or both causes that the humanist does not occur. sent7: the expensing Garrison occurs if the getting does not occur but the reopening chatroom occurs. sent8: that the expensing Garrison does not occur triggers that the concerning nurser occurs. sent9: the revision does not occur or the cocooning occurs or both.
sent6 & sent9 -> int1: the humanist does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the taxableness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the humanistness does not occur but the taxableness happens.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the expensing Garrison does not occur but the get occurs.; int3 -> int4: the expensing Garrison does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the concerning nurser happens.;
the taxableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the taxableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the humanistness happens then that the taxableness happens is not incorrect. sent2: not the actinomorphicness but the katharobicness happens. sent3: the reopening chatroom does not occur. sent4: if the exporting does not occur then the concerning interim happens. sent5: the expensing Garrison does not occur but the getting occurs if that the reopening chatroom does not occur is correct. sent6: that the revision does not occur or the cocooning or both causes that the humanist does not occur. sent7: the expensing Garrison occurs if the getting does not occur but the reopening chatroom occurs. sent8: that the expensing Garrison does not occur triggers that the concerning nurser occurs. sent9: the revision does not occur or the cocooning occurs or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent9 -> int1: the humanist does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the taxableness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the humanistness does not occur but the taxableness happens.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the expensing Garrison does not occur but the get occurs.; int3 -> int4: the expensing Garrison does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the concerning nurser happens.; __UNKNOWN__