the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and does not acquaint stoker.
sent1: the fact that the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and acquaints stoker is not right. sent2: that something is a Steinbeck is not incorrect. sent3: the flexor is a Iraqi if the valvule is both Iraqi and not a Steinbeck. sent4: if the fact that something does not regret and is anaphasic is wrong then it is not anaphasic. sent5: the valvule does not acquaint stoker and is non-Iraqi. sent6: the valvule is not a Iraqi and it is not a Steinbeck if the wastage does not reside. sent7: the wastage is a Iraqi if there is something such that it is not a Steinbeck. sent8: if the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and acquaints stoker then the fact that the wastage is not a Iraqi is right. sent9: the valvule does not acquaint stoker. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a Steinbeck. sent11: if the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and does not acquaint stoker then the wastage is not Iraqi. sent12: if something is not anaphasic then that it is a Araujia and it is not a kind of a bullshit is false. sent13: if the fact that something is a Araujia that is not a bullshit is not correct it does not reside.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and it does not acquaint stoker.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the wastage is not Iraqi.; sent10 & sent7 -> int2: the wastage is Iraqi.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the flexor is a Iraqi.
sent13 -> int4: the wastage does not reside if that it is a kind of a Araujia and it is not a bullshit is not true.; sent12 -> int5: that the wastage is a Araujia and is not a bullshit does not hold if it is not anaphasic.; sent4 -> int6: if the fact that the fact that the wastage does not regret and is anaphasic is not wrong is not right then it is not anaphasic.;
$hypothesis$ = the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and does not acquaint stoker. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and acquaints stoker is not right. sent2: that something is a Steinbeck is not incorrect. sent3: the flexor is a Iraqi if the valvule is both Iraqi and not a Steinbeck. sent4: if the fact that something does not regret and is anaphasic is wrong then it is not anaphasic. sent5: the valvule does not acquaint stoker and is non-Iraqi. sent6: the valvule is not a Iraqi and it is not a Steinbeck if the wastage does not reside. sent7: the wastage is a Iraqi if there is something such that it is not a Steinbeck. sent8: if the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and acquaints stoker then the fact that the wastage is not a Iraqi is right. sent9: the valvule does not acquaint stoker. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a Steinbeck. sent11: if the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and does not acquaint stoker then the wastage is not Iraqi. sent12: if something is not anaphasic then that it is a Araujia and it is not a kind of a bullshit is false. sent13: if the fact that something is a Araujia that is not a bullshit is not correct it does not reside. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valvule does not acquaint gamebag and it does not acquaint stoker.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the wastage is not Iraqi.; sent10 & sent7 -> int2: the wastage is Iraqi.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__