the toddler is not priestly.
sent1: if something is not a twelve then that it is not haptic hold. sent2: there exists something such that that it is dimorphic hold. sent3: that the at is not carposporic and not equatorial is not true. sent4: the fact that the at is a kind of carposporic thing that is not a kind of an equatorial is not correct. sent5: the herbivore does incriminate mantissa if the at does summarize. sent6: something that is not an interaction is not a twelve. sent7: if something is not a kind of a twelve it is dimorphic and is not haptic. sent8: that the at is not carposporic but it is equatorial does not hold. sent9: something is dimorphic and is haptic. sent10: the Honduran is not an interaction if the herbivore does incriminate mantissa. sent11: if that something is a kind of non-carposporic thing that is not an equatorial is not right then it does summarize. sent12: if something is dimorphic thing that is not haptic then the toddler is priestly.
sent11 -> int1: the at summarizes if that it is not carposporic and it is not a kind of an equatorial does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the at does summarize.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the herbivore incriminates mantissa.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the Honduran is not an interaction.; sent6 -> int5: the Honduran is not a kind of a twelve if it is not a kind of an interaction.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Honduran is not a kind of a twelve.; sent7 -> int7: if the Honduran is not a twelve then it is dimorphic but not haptic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Honduran is both not non-dimorphic and non-haptic.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is dimorphic but not haptic.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the toddler is not priestly. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a twelve then that it is not haptic hold. sent2: there exists something such that that it is dimorphic hold. sent3: that the at is not carposporic and not equatorial is not true. sent4: the fact that the at is a kind of carposporic thing that is not a kind of an equatorial is not correct. sent5: the herbivore does incriminate mantissa if the at does summarize. sent6: something that is not an interaction is not a twelve. sent7: if something is not a kind of a twelve it is dimorphic and is not haptic. sent8: that the at is not carposporic but it is equatorial does not hold. sent9: something is dimorphic and is haptic. sent10: the Honduran is not an interaction if the herbivore does incriminate mantissa. sent11: if that something is a kind of non-carposporic thing that is not an equatorial is not right then it does summarize. sent12: if something is dimorphic thing that is not haptic then the toddler is priestly. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the at summarizes if that it is not carposporic and it is not a kind of an equatorial does not hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the at does summarize.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the herbivore incriminates mantissa.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the Honduran is not an interaction.; sent6 -> int5: the Honduran is not a kind of a twelve if it is not a kind of an interaction.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Honduran is not a kind of a twelve.; sent7 -> int7: if the Honduran is not a twelve then it is dimorphic but not haptic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Honduran is both not non-dimorphic and non-haptic.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is dimorphic but not haptic.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__