the fact that the German does ignore Raphicerus and/or it does not varnish equivalent is not right.
sent1: the seesaw refutes cultivator if it ignores Teller and it is non-allylic. sent2: the domino is a Taracahitian. sent3: if the fact that the pycnidium is a caudate is not incorrect the seesaw does ignore Teller but it is not allylic. sent4: the German is phagocytic if the seesaw refutes cultivator. sent5: that something ignores Raphicerus or does not varnish equivalent or both is wrong if it is not a Taracahitian. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Taracahitian or it is a kind of an equivalent or both is not incorrect the pycnidium is caudate. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the German is not non-phagocytic is not incorrect then the German does ignore Raphicerus is not wrong.
sent2 -> int1: the domino is a Taracahitian or it is an equivalent or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a Taracahitian and/or an equivalent.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the pycnidium is a kind of a caudate.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the seesaw does ignore Teller and is not allylic.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the seesaw does refute cultivator.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the German is phagocytic.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the German does ignore Raphicerus.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the German ignores Raphicerus or does not varnish equivalent or both is incorrect.
sent5 -> int8: the fact that either the German does ignore Raphicerus or it does not varnish equivalent or both is wrong if it is not a Taracahitian.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the German does ignore Raphicerus and/or it does not varnish equivalent is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the seesaw refutes cultivator if it ignores Teller and it is non-allylic. sent2: the domino is a Taracahitian. sent3: if the fact that the pycnidium is a caudate is not incorrect the seesaw does ignore Teller but it is not allylic. sent4: the German is phagocytic if the seesaw refutes cultivator. sent5: that something ignores Raphicerus or does not varnish equivalent or both is wrong if it is not a Taracahitian. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Taracahitian or it is a kind of an equivalent or both is not incorrect the pycnidium is caudate. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the German is not non-phagocytic is not incorrect then the German does ignore Raphicerus is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the domino is a Taracahitian or it is an equivalent or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a Taracahitian and/or an equivalent.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the pycnidium is a kind of a caudate.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the seesaw does ignore Teller and is not allylic.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the seesaw does refute cultivator.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the German is phagocytic.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the German does ignore Raphicerus.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__