that the similarness occurs brings about that the soiling does not occur and the implanting occurs.
sent1: the propping happens if the blasphemy happens. sent2: if the beating bigot does not occur the soiling does not occur but the implant occurs. sent3: if the similarness does not occur then the blasphemy does not occur and the propping does not occur. sent4: the soiling does not occur. sent5: the fact that the blasphemy occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the basketry does not occur but the snuffling hydrofoil happens is wrong. sent6: that the similarness happens and the props happens prevents that the beating bigot occurs. sent7: if the dietary occurs then the enjoying snowshoe happens. sent8: either the basketry or the snuffling hydrofoil or both occurs if the fact that the blasphemy does not occur hold. sent9: the biblioticsness does not occur. sent10: that the technologicalness happens and the Demosthenicness occurs triggers that the spooning dogleg does not occur. sent11: the locker-roomness occurs. sent12: if the beating bigot does not occur the soiling does not occur. sent13: the fact that the basketry happens and the snuffling hydrofoil happens is wrong. sent14: if the basketry occurs the things does not occur but the limbicness happens. sent15: that not the biblioticsness but the snuffling carnation happens is true. sent16: the fact that not the mesoblasticness but the frothing happens is not true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the similarness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the basketry does not occur but the snuffling hydrofoil happens.; assump1 -> int1: the snuffling hydrofoil happens.;
the things does not occur but the limbicness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the similarness occurs brings about that the soiling does not occur and the implanting occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the propping happens if the blasphemy happens. sent2: if the beating bigot does not occur the soiling does not occur but the implant occurs. sent3: if the similarness does not occur then the blasphemy does not occur and the propping does not occur. sent4: the soiling does not occur. sent5: the fact that the blasphemy occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the basketry does not occur but the snuffling hydrofoil happens is wrong. sent6: that the similarness happens and the props happens prevents that the beating bigot occurs. sent7: if the dietary occurs then the enjoying snowshoe happens. sent8: either the basketry or the snuffling hydrofoil or both occurs if the fact that the blasphemy does not occur hold. sent9: the biblioticsness does not occur. sent10: that the technologicalness happens and the Demosthenicness occurs triggers that the spooning dogleg does not occur. sent11: the locker-roomness occurs. sent12: if the beating bigot does not occur the soiling does not occur. sent13: the fact that the basketry happens and the snuffling hydrofoil happens is wrong. sent14: if the basketry occurs the things does not occur but the limbicness happens. sent15: that not the biblioticsness but the snuffling carnation happens is true. sent16: the fact that not the mesoblasticness but the frothing happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the similarness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the basketry does not occur but the snuffling hydrofoil happens.; assump1 -> int1: the snuffling hydrofoil happens.; __UNKNOWN__