that the Sunnite is not irresponsible and it is non-relative does not hold.
sent1: the record is non-irresponsible if something is similar and it is a pekoe. sent2: that the Sunnite is a pekoe and is not a relative is not correct. sent3: the Arctic is a kind of a pekoe. sent4: if something sandpapers gawkiness and does not summon the Arctic is a bottle-tree. sent5: the fact that the Sunnite is not irresponsible and not a relative is incorrect if the record is not irresponsible. sent6: the buckskins is both not a wash and maladroit. sent7: if the buckskins does not wash it sandpapers gawkiness and it does not summon.
sent6 -> int1: the buckskins is not a kind of a wash.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the buckskins sandpapers gawkiness but it does not summon.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does sandpaper gawkiness and it does not summon.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the Arctic is a bottle-tree.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Sunnite is not irresponsible and it is non-relative does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the record is non-irresponsible if something is similar and it is a pekoe. sent2: that the Sunnite is a pekoe and is not a relative is not correct. sent3: the Arctic is a kind of a pekoe. sent4: if something sandpapers gawkiness and does not summon the Arctic is a bottle-tree. sent5: the fact that the Sunnite is not irresponsible and not a relative is incorrect if the record is not irresponsible. sent6: the buckskins is both not a wash and maladroit. sent7: if the buckskins does not wash it sandpapers gawkiness and it does not summon. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the buckskins is not a kind of a wash.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the buckskins sandpapers gawkiness but it does not summon.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does sandpaper gawkiness and it does not summon.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the Arctic is a bottle-tree.; __UNKNOWN__