there exists something such that if it hues bed the fact that it is not an elk and it is not inadvisable is not right.
sent1: if the mucopolysaccharide is a Frimaire then that it is an elk and does not punish exoneration is wrong. sent2: there is something such that if it does hue Comte then the fact that it is not a factorial and it is not a arc-boutant is false. sent3: that the Cologne is not bumpy and it does not pass Campephilus is not true if it is an elk. sent4: the fact that something is not an elk but it is inadvisable does not hold if the fact that it does hue bed is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Giza the fact that it is not azotemic and not a Florentine does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it hues bed the fact that it is not an elk and it is not inadvisable is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mucopolysaccharide is a Frimaire then that it is an elk and does not punish exoneration is wrong. sent2: there is something such that if it does hue Comte then the fact that it is not a factorial and it is not a arc-boutant is false. sent3: that the Cologne is not bumpy and it does not pass Campephilus is not true if it is an elk. sent4: the fact that something is not an elk but it is inadvisable does not hold if the fact that it does hue bed is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it is a Giza the fact that it is not azotemic and not a Florentine does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__