that if the shuddering happens the non-nephriticness and the non-topographicalness occurs is not true.
sent1: if the Liverpudlian does not occur then both the wholesaling and the shuddering happens. sent2: the photoconductiveness happens if the labeling happens. sent3: the nephriticness and the non-topographicalness occurs if the fact that the shuddering occurs is not incorrect. sent4: the pretending does not occur and the hurdles does not occur if the automotiveness does not occur. sent5: the topographicalness does not occur. sent6: that the snafuing does not occur and the nonarborealness does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the Liverpudlianness occurs. sent8: that the label occurs and the nephriticness happens hold if the sulking does not occur. sent9: if the shuddering happens the topographicalness does not occur. sent10: the unawareness and the non-adnexalness happens. sent11: the topographicalness does not occur if the labeling does not occur. sent12: the nephriticness but not the topographicalness happens. sent13: if the shuddering and the Liverpudlianness occurs the fact that the label does not occur is correct. sent14: if the fact that the label does not occur is correct then both the nephriticness and the non-topographicalness happens. sent15: that the magnification does not occur brings about that not the sulk but the circumduction occurs. sent16: that the nephriticness does not occur and the topographicalness does not occur is triggered by that the label does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shuddering happens.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the shuddering occurs and the Liverpudlian happens.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the label does not occur is true.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: both the non-nephriticness and the non-topographicalness happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the photoconductiveness and the wholesale occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that if the shuddering happens the non-nephriticness and the non-topographicalness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Liverpudlian does not occur then both the wholesaling and the shuddering happens. sent2: the photoconductiveness happens if the labeling happens. sent3: the nephriticness and the non-topographicalness occurs if the fact that the shuddering occurs is not incorrect. sent4: the pretending does not occur and the hurdles does not occur if the automotiveness does not occur. sent5: the topographicalness does not occur. sent6: that the snafuing does not occur and the nonarborealness does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the Liverpudlianness occurs. sent8: that the label occurs and the nephriticness happens hold if the sulking does not occur. sent9: if the shuddering happens the topographicalness does not occur. sent10: the unawareness and the non-adnexalness happens. sent11: the topographicalness does not occur if the labeling does not occur. sent12: the nephriticness but not the topographicalness happens. sent13: if the shuddering and the Liverpudlianness occurs the fact that the label does not occur is correct. sent14: if the fact that the label does not occur is correct then both the nephriticness and the non-topographicalness happens. sent15: that the magnification does not occur brings about that not the sulk but the circumduction occurs. sent16: that the nephriticness does not occur and the topographicalness does not occur is triggered by that the label does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shuddering happens.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the shuddering occurs and the Liverpudlian happens.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the label does not occur is true.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: both the non-nephriticness and the non-topographicalness happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__