the fact that there is something such that if it decoys and it is a farrier it is not a double is not true.
sent1: if the neurologist does boggle and it is a decoy it is not unhealthful. sent2: there exists something such that if it governs and it is pervious then it is not nascent. sent3: the buckminsterfullerene is not a compliment if it is a farrier and it is influential. sent4: that the buckminsterfullerene refreshes reentry is not true if it is a kind of a Menshevik that is a kind of a oxycephaly. sent5: something does not greet drug if it is vestibular and it is a decoy. sent6: there exists something such that if it is alliaceous and it is unmown it does not greet Hemiramphidae. sent7: the buckminsterfullerene is not a bordelaise if that it is both not non-double and not uninfluential is right. sent8: if the buckminsterfullerene is a kind of a decoy and is a farrier then it does not double. sent9: there exists something such that if it is pervious thing that is a gutlessness then it is not shutting. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a decoy and is a farrier then it does double. sent11: if the buckminsterfullerene is a farrier and it is a marsupial it is not indissoluble. sent12: if the buckminsterfullerene decoys and it is a kind of a farrier it does double. sent13: if the pollen is a decoy and is a photocathode then it is not a topic. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of nonwashable thing that is a kind of a Pinnotheridae then it is not hornless.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
if the buckminsterfullerene is vestibular a decoy then that it does not greet drug hold.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it decoys and it is a farrier it is not a double is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the neurologist does boggle and it is a decoy it is not unhealthful. sent2: there exists something such that if it governs and it is pervious then it is not nascent. sent3: the buckminsterfullerene is not a compliment if it is a farrier and it is influential. sent4: that the buckminsterfullerene refreshes reentry is not true if it is a kind of a Menshevik that is a kind of a oxycephaly. sent5: something does not greet drug if it is vestibular and it is a decoy. sent6: there exists something such that if it is alliaceous and it is unmown it does not greet Hemiramphidae. sent7: the buckminsterfullerene is not a bordelaise if that it is both not non-double and not uninfluential is right. sent8: if the buckminsterfullerene is a kind of a decoy and is a farrier then it does not double. sent9: there exists something such that if it is pervious thing that is a gutlessness then it is not shutting. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a decoy and is a farrier then it does double. sent11: if the buckminsterfullerene is a farrier and it is a marsupial it is not indissoluble. sent12: if the buckminsterfullerene decoys and it is a kind of a farrier it does double. sent13: if the pollen is a decoy and is a photocathode then it is not a topic. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of nonwashable thing that is a kind of a Pinnotheridae then it is not hornless. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__