there is something such that if it is sensitive and is congestive then it is a kind of a poignance.
sent1: the AI is a polony if it is not ethnographic and it is a kind of a poignance. sent2: there is something such that if it is not vibrational and it is two-dimensional it is a Shema. sent3: if something that is a Cantharellus is a Pincus it is an amorist. sent4: something is a poignance if it is insensitive and it is congestive. sent5: something is a view if it is both vicarial and dendritic. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Cybele and is a seaquake then it is mutable. sent7: there is something such that if it does not drape spam and it is vegetative then it is nonextensile. sent8: if something that does not drape AI is emphysematous then it drapes Vinson. sent9: if something that is not a diestrus advises it does counterpoint fatback. sent10: the spam is nonmechanical if it does drape motto and is a kind of a poignance. sent11: that there is something such that if the fact that it is insensitive and is congestive is not wrong it is a kind of a poignance is right. sent12: if something is not insensitive but it is congestive it is a poignance. sent13: the AI is a kind of a poignance if it is not a Nacimiento and it is a diestrus. sent14: if something that is not congestive does shaft it is homostylous. sent15: the AI does reorient if it is not a paint and it is insensitive. sent16: there is something such that if it does not rewrite Anastomus and is a thong it is a Vinson. sent17: there is something such that if it is a Lupus and it rewrites tun it is a Ipsus. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Young and does rewrite tumble-dryer it does drape darkness.
sent12 -> int1: if the AI is sensitive but it is congestive it is a kind of a poignance.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the AI is homostylous if that it is not congestive and it shafts is true.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is sensitive and is congestive then it is a kind of a poignance. ; $context$ = sent1: the AI is a polony if it is not ethnographic and it is a kind of a poignance. sent2: there is something such that if it is not vibrational and it is two-dimensional it is a Shema. sent3: if something that is a Cantharellus is a Pincus it is an amorist. sent4: something is a poignance if it is insensitive and it is congestive. sent5: something is a view if it is both vicarial and dendritic. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Cybele and is a seaquake then it is mutable. sent7: there is something such that if it does not drape spam and it is vegetative then it is nonextensile. sent8: if something that does not drape AI is emphysematous then it drapes Vinson. sent9: if something that is not a diestrus advises it does counterpoint fatback. sent10: the spam is nonmechanical if it does drape motto and is a kind of a poignance. sent11: that there is something such that if the fact that it is insensitive and is congestive is not wrong it is a kind of a poignance is right. sent12: if something is not insensitive but it is congestive it is a poignance. sent13: the AI is a kind of a poignance if it is not a Nacimiento and it is a diestrus. sent14: if something that is not congestive does shaft it is homostylous. sent15: the AI does reorient if it is not a paint and it is insensitive. sent16: there is something such that if it does not rewrite Anastomus and is a thong it is a Vinson. sent17: there is something such that if it is a Lupus and it rewrites tun it is a Ipsus. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Young and does rewrite tumble-dryer it does drape darkness. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the AI is sensitive but it is congestive it is a kind of a poignance.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__