the effects is not a Shiite.
sent1: if the lymphoblast is not a bench then that the couchette does not shout but it is poetics does not hold. sent2: the couchette is poetics if the fact that it does not shout is not incorrect. sent3: if something is unconditional that it does not network welder and it is not a stylus does not hold. sent4: if something is a kind of a bench or networks welder or both it is not a Shiite. sent5: if that something is a stylus and does not network welder is not right it is not poetics. sent6: the optometrist benches but it is not a redefinition. sent7: if something is not unconditional that the fact that it is a kind of a stylus and does not network welder hold is not correct. sent8: the fact that the effects is not a Shiite and is unconditional is not true. sent9: that the couchette shouts and is poetics is not true. sent10: that the effects is not a kind of a Shiite is right if the fact that the couchette does not shout and is poetics is not correct. sent11: if the fact that the couchette does not network welder and is a kind of a bench does not hold the lymphoblast is non-poetics. sent12: that the marlite is not unconditional is not incorrect. sent13: the couchette is not a kind of a Shiite if that the lymphoblast is not a stylus and is poetics is wrong. sent14: the Iranian is not unconditional if there exists something such that it does not shout and/or it is not unconditional. sent15: the lymphoblast is unconditional if there is something such that it is a bench and it is poetics. sent16: the lymphoblast networks welder but it is not a stylus. sent17: something is not a kind of a bench if it networks welder or is not conditional or both. sent18: if the couchette is a Shiite then the effects does not shout. sent19: the fact that the couchette does network welder and it is poetics is incorrect if the lymphoblast is not unconditional. sent20: the lymphoblast is not a stylus if the fact that the couchette is both not poetics and unconditional does not hold.
sent16 -> int1: the lymphoblast does network welder.; int1 -> int2: the lymphoblast networks welder or it is not conditional or both.; sent17 -> int3: the lymphoblast is not a kind of a bench if it either does network welder or is not conditional or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the lymphoblast is not a bench.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the couchette does not shout and is poetics is incorrect.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Iranian is not poetics.
sent7 -> int6: that the Iranian is a stylus but it does not network welder is false if it is not unconditional.; sent5 -> int7: if that the Iranian is a stylus but it does not network welder is wrong then it is not poetics.;
$hypothesis$ = the effects is not a Shiite. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lymphoblast is not a bench then that the couchette does not shout but it is poetics does not hold. sent2: the couchette is poetics if the fact that it does not shout is not incorrect. sent3: if something is unconditional that it does not network welder and it is not a stylus does not hold. sent4: if something is a kind of a bench or networks welder or both it is not a Shiite. sent5: if that something is a stylus and does not network welder is not right it is not poetics. sent6: the optometrist benches but it is not a redefinition. sent7: if something is not unconditional that the fact that it is a kind of a stylus and does not network welder hold is not correct. sent8: the fact that the effects is not a Shiite and is unconditional is not true. sent9: that the couchette shouts and is poetics is not true. sent10: that the effects is not a kind of a Shiite is right if the fact that the couchette does not shout and is poetics is not correct. sent11: if the fact that the couchette does not network welder and is a kind of a bench does not hold the lymphoblast is non-poetics. sent12: that the marlite is not unconditional is not incorrect. sent13: the couchette is not a kind of a Shiite if that the lymphoblast is not a stylus and is poetics is wrong. sent14: the Iranian is not unconditional if there exists something such that it does not shout and/or it is not unconditional. sent15: the lymphoblast is unconditional if there is something such that it is a bench and it is poetics. sent16: the lymphoblast networks welder but it is not a stylus. sent17: something is not a kind of a bench if it networks welder or is not conditional or both. sent18: if the couchette is a Shiite then the effects does not shout. sent19: the fact that the couchette does network welder and it is poetics is incorrect if the lymphoblast is not unconditional. sent20: the lymphoblast is not a stylus if the fact that the couchette is both not poetics and unconditional does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the lymphoblast does network welder.; int1 -> int2: the lymphoblast networks welder or it is not conditional or both.; sent17 -> int3: the lymphoblast is not a kind of a bench if it either does network welder or is not conditional or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the lymphoblast is not a bench.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the couchette does not shout and is poetics is incorrect.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__