the epiphany and the non-citrousness happens if the temptation happens.
sent1: that the visceralness does not occur brings about that the heraldicness but not the gorging Halictidae happens. sent2: if the part happens the tightening does not occur. sent3: if that the Lusitanianness does not occur hold then the epiphany and the non-citrousness occurs. sent4: the zodiacalness does not occur. sent5: if the refraining ineligibility happens that the temptation does not occur is not false. sent6: that the cant occurs and the astragalarness occurs is wrong if the waterpower does not occur. sent7: the Lusitanianness does not occur if the fact that both the coasting and the coursing happens does not hold. sent8: the collectivization does not occur. sent9: the pyrochemicalness does not occur. sent10: that the assembling coil does not occur is prevented by that the refraining fireclay happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the temptation happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the refraining ineligibility occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the temptation does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the refraining ineligibility does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the epiphany and the non-citrousness happens if the temptation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the visceralness does not occur brings about that the heraldicness but not the gorging Halictidae happens. sent2: if the part happens the tightening does not occur. sent3: if that the Lusitanianness does not occur hold then the epiphany and the non-citrousness occurs. sent4: the zodiacalness does not occur. sent5: if the refraining ineligibility happens that the temptation does not occur is not false. sent6: that the cant occurs and the astragalarness occurs is wrong if the waterpower does not occur. sent7: the Lusitanianness does not occur if the fact that both the coasting and the coursing happens does not hold. sent8: the collectivization does not occur. sent9: the pyrochemicalness does not occur. sent10: that the assembling coil does not occur is prevented by that the refraining fireclay happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the temptation happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the refraining ineligibility occurs.; sent5 & assump2 -> int1: the temptation does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the refraining ineligibility does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__