there is something such that it does luxuriate and is popliteal.
sent1: something luxuriates. sent2: the fact that something does bedew grading but it is not pilar does not hold if it does reckon. sent3: the sponger is popliteal. sent4: the sponger does luxuriate. sent5: if something is not seismological the fact that it does not luxuriate and is popliteal is not wrong. sent6: the sponger deglazes monorail. sent7: the Stoker luxuriates. sent8: there is something such that it is popliteal. sent9: something does reckon if that it is a kind of a Washingtonian that is not a czarina is not true. sent10: if the sponger is a dilution then the fact that it is a kind of a Washingtonian and is not a czarina does not hold. sent11: if the sponger does not luxuriate but it is popliteal the ringmaster does luxuriate. sent12: the warder is popliteal. sent13: something is not seismological if the fact that it does bedew grading and is not pilar does not hold. sent14: something is questionable and a whisper.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the sponger does luxuriate and is popliteal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the ringmaster does luxuriate.
sent5 -> int2: if the sponger is not seismological it does not luxuriate and it is popliteal.; sent13 -> int3: if that the sponger does bedew grading but it is not pilar does not hold it is not seismological.; sent2 -> int4: if the sponger does reckon then the fact that it bedews grading and it is not pilar is incorrect.; sent9 -> int5: the sponger reckons if the fact that it is a kind of Washingtonian thing that is not a czarina is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does luxuriate and is popliteal. ; $context$ = sent1: something luxuriates. sent2: the fact that something does bedew grading but it is not pilar does not hold if it does reckon. sent3: the sponger is popliteal. sent4: the sponger does luxuriate. sent5: if something is not seismological the fact that it does not luxuriate and is popliteal is not wrong. sent6: the sponger deglazes monorail. sent7: the Stoker luxuriates. sent8: there is something such that it is popliteal. sent9: something does reckon if that it is a kind of a Washingtonian that is not a czarina is not true. sent10: if the sponger is a dilution then the fact that it is a kind of a Washingtonian and is not a czarina does not hold. sent11: if the sponger does not luxuriate but it is popliteal the ringmaster does luxuriate. sent12: the warder is popliteal. sent13: something is not seismological if the fact that it does bedew grading and is not pilar does not hold. sent14: something is questionable and a whisper. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the sponger does luxuriate and is popliteal.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__