that the lash is not unsold and does not crook kalumpang does not hold.
sent1: the lash is not Pauline. sent2: that the bellwether ammoniates lash is true if the lash is non-Pauline a formality. sent3: there is something such that it does not ammoniate lash and it is a pedantry. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not clank is correct. sent5: the coloradillo is not nonlinguistic. sent6: that if the lash is not the formality then the fact that the lash is a kind of non-unsold thing that does not crook kalumpang is false is not wrong. sent7: that the coloradillo is not epizoan and is not nonlinguistic does not hold if it is a pedantry. sent8: the fact that the lash is not unsold and does crook kalumpang is not true. sent9: there is something such that it does ammoniate lash. sent10: if something does not clank then the coloradillo is not epizoan and it is not nonlinguistic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lash is a kind of a formality.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the lash is a kind of non-Pauline thing that is a formality.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the bellwether does ammoniate lash.; sent4 & sent10 -> int3: the coloradillo is not epizoan and it is linguistic.;
the lash is not unsold and it does not crook kalumpang.
$hypothesis$ = that the lash is not unsold and does not crook kalumpang does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the lash is not Pauline. sent2: that the bellwether ammoniates lash is true if the lash is non-Pauline a formality. sent3: there is something such that it does not ammoniate lash and it is a pedantry. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does not clank is correct. sent5: the coloradillo is not nonlinguistic. sent6: that if the lash is not the formality then the fact that the lash is a kind of non-unsold thing that does not crook kalumpang is false is not wrong. sent7: that the coloradillo is not epizoan and is not nonlinguistic does not hold if it is a pedantry. sent8: the fact that the lash is not unsold and does crook kalumpang is not true. sent9: there is something such that it does ammoniate lash. sent10: if something does not clank then the coloradillo is not epizoan and it is not nonlinguistic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lash is a kind of a formality.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the lash is a kind of non-Pauline thing that is a formality.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the bellwether does ammoniate lash.; sent4 & sent10 -> int3: the coloradillo is not epizoan and it is linguistic.; __UNKNOWN__