the fact that that the edging is a swatch but it is not a kind of a bevy is incorrect is right.
sent1: the edging is prosthodontic. sent2: something is non-vibrational thing that is a grudging if it is hydrodynamics. sent3: the aquanaut does mooch gardener. sent4: the edging is a kind of an accelerator. sent5: the chaetodon is a swatch but it is not hydrodynamics. sent6: if something mooches gardener then the chaetodon is not hydrodynamics. sent7: if the chaetodon is hydrodynamics and it reorients griddlecake the edging is not a bevy. sent8: the trusty is a Adams if it does swelter. sent9: that something is a swatch that is not a kind of a bevy is wrong if it does not mooch gardener. sent10: if the trusty is not vibrational the chaetodon is a grudging that is hydrodynamics. sent11: the edging does not grudge. sent12: the chaetodon is not hydrodynamics. sent13: the chaetodon is not a photo-offset but it is an accelerator. sent14: there exists something such that it is hydrodynamics. sent15: if the chaetodon is hydrodynamics the edging reorients griddlecake and/or does not mooch gardener. sent16: if the chaetodon is vibrational it is both not an accelerator and hydrodynamics. sent17: something is a kind of non-documentary thing that is a yottabyte if it is an accelerator. sent18: if something is vibrational it is not a grudging. sent19: The gardener does mooch aquanaut. sent20: something is non-vibrational thing that is a kind of an accelerator if it is a kind of a Adams. sent21: something that does reorient griddlecake and/or does not mooch gardener does not mooch gardener. sent22: something that is vibrational does not grudge and is a kind of a swatch. sent23: the chaetodon is a kind of non-hydrodynamics thing that does reorient griddlecake if there is something such that it mooches gardener. sent24: the edging is not a kind of a bevy if the chaetodon is not hydrodynamics but it reorients griddlecake. sent25: the edging is an accelerator that is vibrational. sent26: the edging is not a kind of a grudging if it is vibrational.
sent3 -> int1: something mooches gardener.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the fact that the chaetodon is not hydrodynamics but it reorients griddlecake is not false.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the edging is not a bevy.; sent22 -> int4: the edging is not a grudging but it is a swatch if it is vibrational.; sent25 -> int5: the edging is vibrational.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the edging is both not a grudging and a swatch.; int6 -> int7: the edging is a swatch.; int3 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the babbler is a kind of non-documentary thing that is a yottabyte if it is an accelerator.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the edging is a swatch but it is not a kind of a bevy is incorrect is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the edging is prosthodontic. sent2: something is non-vibrational thing that is a grudging if it is hydrodynamics. sent3: the aquanaut does mooch gardener. sent4: the edging is a kind of an accelerator. sent5: the chaetodon is a swatch but it is not hydrodynamics. sent6: if something mooches gardener then the chaetodon is not hydrodynamics. sent7: if the chaetodon is hydrodynamics and it reorients griddlecake the edging is not a bevy. sent8: the trusty is a Adams if it does swelter. sent9: that something is a swatch that is not a kind of a bevy is wrong if it does not mooch gardener. sent10: if the trusty is not vibrational the chaetodon is a grudging that is hydrodynamics. sent11: the edging does not grudge. sent12: the chaetodon is not hydrodynamics. sent13: the chaetodon is not a photo-offset but it is an accelerator. sent14: there exists something such that it is hydrodynamics. sent15: if the chaetodon is hydrodynamics the edging reorients griddlecake and/or does not mooch gardener. sent16: if the chaetodon is vibrational it is both not an accelerator and hydrodynamics. sent17: something is a kind of non-documentary thing that is a yottabyte if it is an accelerator. sent18: if something is vibrational it is not a grudging. sent19: The gardener does mooch aquanaut. sent20: something is non-vibrational thing that is a kind of an accelerator if it is a kind of a Adams. sent21: something that does reorient griddlecake and/or does not mooch gardener does not mooch gardener. sent22: something that is vibrational does not grudge and is a kind of a swatch. sent23: the chaetodon is a kind of non-hydrodynamics thing that does reorient griddlecake if there is something such that it mooches gardener. sent24: the edging is not a kind of a bevy if the chaetodon is not hydrodynamics but it reorients griddlecake. sent25: the edging is an accelerator that is vibrational. sent26: the edging is not a kind of a grudging if it is vibrational. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: something mooches gardener.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the fact that the chaetodon is not hydrodynamics but it reorients griddlecake is not false.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the edging is not a bevy.; sent22 -> int4: the edging is not a grudging but it is a swatch if it is vibrational.; sent25 -> int5: the edging is vibrational.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the edging is both not a grudging and a swatch.; int6 -> int7: the edging is a swatch.; int3 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__