the fact that the osmiridium is not a gaze and it does not kid hold.
sent1: if the perithelium is granulomatous the camper is a kind of an operative. sent2: the osmiridium does not kid. sent3: if the garboard is burlesque then the perithelium is granulomatous. sent4: a granulomatous thing that is a kind of an operative is not a burlesque. sent5: the fact that the wren-tit is a kind of a bedroll hold. sent6: the osmiridium is a kind of an operative. sent7: something does kid and it is a kind of a BD. sent8: The ethnarch elaborates freeman. sent9: there is something such that it does elaborate ethnarch. sent10: if the in-law is not a BD the fact that that the wren-tit does not gaze and it does not elaborate ethnarch is not wrong is not right. sent11: the fact that the osmiridium is a bedroll is not false. sent12: the freeman elaborates ethnarch. sent13: the wren-tit is a bedroll and it gazes. sent14: the garboard is a burlesque. sent15: there exists something such that it is a BD. sent16: the freeman does kid. sent17: something does axe Vela and is a kind of a cachou. sent18: the cling is not a bedroll. sent19: the wren-tit is a burlesque and it is a bedroll. sent20: the wren-tit is granulomatous. sent21: the wren-tit is an operative if something is a BD and it elaborates ethnarch. sent22: the osmiridium does not kid if the freeman is not a BD. sent23: the fact that the freeman is a kind of a bedroll hold. sent24: the wren-tit is not a corkscrew and it is not a kid.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freeman is a BD.; assump1 & sent12 -> int1: the freeman is a BD and does elaborate ethnarch.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a BD and it elaborates ethnarch.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the wren-tit is operative.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the wren-tit is granulomatous and it is an operative.; sent4 -> int5: that if the wren-tit is both granulomatous and operative then that the wren-tit is not burlesque is not false is not wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the wren-tit is not burlesque.; sent19 -> int7: the wren-tit is a kind of a burlesque.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the freeman is not a kind of a BD.;
the fact that the osmiridium does not gaze and it is not a kid does not hold.
sent3 & sent14 -> int10: the perithelium is granulomatous.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: that the camper is operative is not wrong.; int11 -> int12: there are operative things.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the osmiridium is not a gaze and it does not kid hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the perithelium is granulomatous the camper is a kind of an operative. sent2: the osmiridium does not kid. sent3: if the garboard is burlesque then the perithelium is granulomatous. sent4: a granulomatous thing that is a kind of an operative is not a burlesque. sent5: the fact that the wren-tit is a kind of a bedroll hold. sent6: the osmiridium is a kind of an operative. sent7: something does kid and it is a kind of a BD. sent8: The ethnarch elaborates freeman. sent9: there is something such that it does elaborate ethnarch. sent10: if the in-law is not a BD the fact that that the wren-tit does not gaze and it does not elaborate ethnarch is not wrong is not right. sent11: the fact that the osmiridium is a bedroll is not false. sent12: the freeman elaborates ethnarch. sent13: the wren-tit is a bedroll and it gazes. sent14: the garboard is a burlesque. sent15: there exists something such that it is a BD. sent16: the freeman does kid. sent17: something does axe Vela and is a kind of a cachou. sent18: the cling is not a bedroll. sent19: the wren-tit is a burlesque and it is a bedroll. sent20: the wren-tit is granulomatous. sent21: the wren-tit is an operative if something is a BD and it elaborates ethnarch. sent22: the osmiridium does not kid if the freeman is not a BD. sent23: the fact that the freeman is a kind of a bedroll hold. sent24: the wren-tit is not a corkscrew and it is not a kid. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freeman is a BD.; assump1 & sent12 -> int1: the freeman is a BD and does elaborate ethnarch.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a BD and it elaborates ethnarch.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the wren-tit is operative.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the wren-tit is granulomatous and it is an operative.; sent4 -> int5: that if the wren-tit is both granulomatous and operative then that the wren-tit is not burlesque is not false is not wrong.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the wren-tit is not burlesque.; sent19 -> int7: the wren-tit is a kind of a burlesque.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the freeman is not a kind of a BD.; __UNKNOWN__