the scuffing happens.
sent1: if the seeking does not occur the confining humanism and the undertide occurs. sent2: the steeplechase does not occur if the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur and the undatableness does not occur. sent3: either the recreationalness occurs or the confining Palau occurs or both if the Gilbertianness does not occur. sent4: the Gilbertianness does not occur. sent5: the losing hovercraft does not occur and the reparableness happens if the deviltry does not occur. sent6: if the prioritizing triazine occurs or the Rhenish occurs or both the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur. sent7: the fact that the robbery does not occur is true if not the losing hovercraft but the confining humanism occurs. sent8: if the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur then the scuffing does not occur and the undatableness does not occur. sent9: if the robbery does not occur the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur and the undatableness does not occur. sent10: if the quadraticness does not occur the voyeuristicness occurs and the scuffing happens. sent11: if the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur the fact that the undatableness does not occur is correct. sent12: the deviltry does not occur. sent13: that the confining chainsaw happens is prevented by that the Rhenishness but not the prioritizing triazine happens. sent14: the quadratic does not occur if the recreationalness happens. sent15: the Rhenish occurs.
sent15 -> int1: either the prioritizing triazine or the Rhenishness or both happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the scuffing does not occur and the undatableness does not occur.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the confining chainsaw does not occur and the steeplechase does not occur.
sent3 & sent4 -> int4: either the recreationalness occurs or the confining Palau happens or both.; sent5 & sent12 -> int5: not the losing hovercraft but the reparableness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the losing hovercraft does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the scuffing happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the seeking does not occur the confining humanism and the undertide occurs. sent2: the steeplechase does not occur if the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur and the undatableness does not occur. sent3: either the recreationalness occurs or the confining Palau occurs or both if the Gilbertianness does not occur. sent4: the Gilbertianness does not occur. sent5: the losing hovercraft does not occur and the reparableness happens if the deviltry does not occur. sent6: if the prioritizing triazine occurs or the Rhenish occurs or both the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur. sent7: the fact that the robbery does not occur is true if not the losing hovercraft but the confining humanism occurs. sent8: if the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur then the scuffing does not occur and the undatableness does not occur. sent9: if the robbery does not occur the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur and the undatableness does not occur. sent10: if the quadraticness does not occur the voyeuristicness occurs and the scuffing happens. sent11: if the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur the fact that the undatableness does not occur is correct. sent12: the deviltry does not occur. sent13: that the confining chainsaw happens is prevented by that the Rhenishness but not the prioritizing triazine happens. sent14: the quadratic does not occur if the recreationalness happens. sent15: the Rhenish occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: either the prioritizing triazine or the Rhenishness or both happens.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the prioritizing metacarpal does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the scuffing does not occur and the undatableness does not occur.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__