the fact that the middle and the noncausativeness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the mechanization happens if the Paleozoicness occurs and the blizzard does not occur. sent2: the blizzard does not occur. sent3: that the salving Leucanthemum does not occur is brought about by that not the simoom but the Trinidadianness occurs. sent4: that the middle and the noncausativeness occurs is false if the unsuccessfulness does not occur. sent5: the clocking trainband does not occur if that the Paleozoic but not the blizzard happens is not true. sent6: the clocking hoot and the salving Leucanthemum happens if the Trinidadianness does not occur. sent7: the disjunction does not occur and/or the unsuccessfulness occurs if the acetonicness happens. sent8: if the mechanization happens then the disjunction happens. sent9: the fact that the Paleozoicness and the blizzard happens is not right. sent10: if the voltaicness does not occur then that the fact that the salving Occidental occurs and the defraying crewelwork happens is wrong is correct. sent11: if the Trinidadianness does not occur the salving Leucanthemum happens. sent12: the salving Leucanthemum happens. sent13: the simoom occurs. sent14: that not the disjunction but the clocking trainband occurs is incorrect if the clocking hoot does not occur. sent15: the mechanization and the noncausativeness happens if the salving Leucanthemum does not occur. sent16: if the blizzard happens then the clocking trainband does not occur. sent17: the Trinidadianness does not occur. sent18: that the mechanization does not occur is prevented by that the Paleozoicness and the blizzard occurs. sent19: that the revealing Napoleon does not occur is brought about by that the mechanization does not occur and the clocking trainband does not occur. sent20: the clocking trainband happens if the simoom happens. sent21: if that not the disjunction but the clocking trainband occurs does not hold the middleness occurs. sent22: that the acetonicness happens is prevented by that the disjunction and the clocking hoot happens. sent23: the non-middleness is prevented by that the mechanization does not occur and the clocking trainband does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Paleozoicness happens and the blizzard does not occur is false.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the clocking trainband does not occur.; sent20 & sent13 -> int2: the clocking trainband occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Paleozoic occurs and the blizzard does not occur.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the mechanization happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the disjunction happens.; sent6 & sent17 -> int7: the clocking hoot happens and the salving Leucanthemum happens.; int7 -> int8: the clocking hoot occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: both the disjunction and the clocking hoot happens.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the acetonicness does not occur.;
both the middling and the noncausativeness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the middle and the noncausativeness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the mechanization happens if the Paleozoicness occurs and the blizzard does not occur. sent2: the blizzard does not occur. sent3: that the salving Leucanthemum does not occur is brought about by that not the simoom but the Trinidadianness occurs. sent4: that the middle and the noncausativeness occurs is false if the unsuccessfulness does not occur. sent5: the clocking trainband does not occur if that the Paleozoic but not the blizzard happens is not true. sent6: the clocking hoot and the salving Leucanthemum happens if the Trinidadianness does not occur. sent7: the disjunction does not occur and/or the unsuccessfulness occurs if the acetonicness happens. sent8: if the mechanization happens then the disjunction happens. sent9: the fact that the Paleozoicness and the blizzard happens is not right. sent10: if the voltaicness does not occur then that the fact that the salving Occidental occurs and the defraying crewelwork happens is wrong is correct. sent11: if the Trinidadianness does not occur the salving Leucanthemum happens. sent12: the salving Leucanthemum happens. sent13: the simoom occurs. sent14: that not the disjunction but the clocking trainband occurs is incorrect if the clocking hoot does not occur. sent15: the mechanization and the noncausativeness happens if the salving Leucanthemum does not occur. sent16: if the blizzard happens then the clocking trainband does not occur. sent17: the Trinidadianness does not occur. sent18: that the mechanization does not occur is prevented by that the Paleozoicness and the blizzard occurs. sent19: that the revealing Napoleon does not occur is brought about by that the mechanization does not occur and the clocking trainband does not occur. sent20: the clocking trainband happens if the simoom happens. sent21: if that not the disjunction but the clocking trainband occurs does not hold the middleness occurs. sent22: that the acetonicness happens is prevented by that the disjunction and the clocking hoot happens. sent23: the non-middleness is prevented by that the mechanization does not occur and the clocking trainband does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Paleozoicness happens and the blizzard does not occur is false.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the clocking trainband does not occur.; sent20 & sent13 -> int2: the clocking trainband occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Paleozoic occurs and the blizzard does not occur.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the mechanization happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the disjunction happens.; sent6 & sent17 -> int7: the clocking hoot happens and the salving Leucanthemum happens.; int7 -> int8: the clocking hoot occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: both the disjunction and the clocking hoot happens.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the acetonicness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__