if the newswoman is not mucinous then the fact that the partridge does harry Olivier and is a hoopoe is incorrect.
sent1: that the partridge harries Olivier and is mucinous is wrong. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it bedews peopled and/or it does not harry geneva is incorrect that the soundbox does not harry Olivier hold. sent3: the partridge is longing. sent4: the plastique does harry Olivier and it bedews peopled if the partridge does not harry Olivier. sent5: if that the plastique is not a hoopoe is true the fact that the partridge is a hoopoe and bedews peopled does not hold. sent6: if that the galleon bedews peopled is not wrong the newswoman is mucinous. sent7: the soundbox does bedew peopled. sent8: the plastique does harry Olivier and harries geneva if the soundbox does not harry Olivier. sent9: something does harry geneva. sent10: if the partridge does not bedew peopled then the fact that the galleon bedew peopled or does not harry Olivier or both is not true. sent11: the fact that the newswoman is a hoopoe and is mucinous is not true if the soundbox does not harry Olivier. sent12: if the partridge does not harry Olivier the fact that the galleon harry Olivier and it does bedew peopled is incorrect. sent13: if the galleon is not mucinous the fact that the plastique is a kind of mucinous thing that bedews peopled is false. sent14: the fact that the partridge harries Olivier and is a hoopoe does not hold if that the soundbox does not harries Olivier is not wrong. sent15: that the partridge harries geneva and it does harry Olivier is not right if that the plastique does not harries geneva hold. sent16: something does bedew peopled or does not harry geneva or both. sent17: the soundbox is not mucinous. sent18: if there is something such that that it is a hoopoe and/or does not harry Olivier is wrong the newswoman is not mucinous. sent19: the partridge harries Olivier if the soundbox is a kind of a hoopoe. sent20: if the galleon does not bedew peopled then the fact that either the plastique bedew peopled or it does not harry geneva or both is incorrect. sent21: the partridge does harry geneva. sent22: if there exists something such that the fact that it is mucinous and/or does not bedew peopled does not hold the newswoman does not harry Olivier.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the galleon does bedew peopled.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the newswoman is mucinous.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the newswoman is not mucinous hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the galleon does not bedew peopled.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: that the plastique does bedew peopled and/or it does not harry geneva is not right.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that either it does bedew peopled or it does not harry geneva or both does not hold.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the soundbox does not harry Olivier.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: that the partridge harries Olivier and is a hoopoe does not hold.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the newswoman is not mucinous then the fact that the partridge does harry Olivier and is a hoopoe is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the partridge harries Olivier and is mucinous is wrong. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it bedews peopled and/or it does not harry geneva is incorrect that the soundbox does not harry Olivier hold. sent3: the partridge is longing. sent4: the plastique does harry Olivier and it bedews peopled if the partridge does not harry Olivier. sent5: if that the plastique is not a hoopoe is true the fact that the partridge is a hoopoe and bedews peopled does not hold. sent6: if that the galleon bedews peopled is not wrong the newswoman is mucinous. sent7: the soundbox does bedew peopled. sent8: the plastique does harry Olivier and harries geneva if the soundbox does not harry Olivier. sent9: something does harry geneva. sent10: if the partridge does not bedew peopled then the fact that the galleon bedew peopled or does not harry Olivier or both is not true. sent11: the fact that the newswoman is a hoopoe and is mucinous is not true if the soundbox does not harry Olivier. sent12: if the partridge does not harry Olivier the fact that the galleon harry Olivier and it does bedew peopled is incorrect. sent13: if the galleon is not mucinous the fact that the plastique is a kind of mucinous thing that bedews peopled is false. sent14: the fact that the partridge harries Olivier and is a hoopoe does not hold if that the soundbox does not harries Olivier is not wrong. sent15: that the partridge harries geneva and it does harry Olivier is not right if that the plastique does not harries geneva hold. sent16: something does bedew peopled or does not harry geneva or both. sent17: the soundbox is not mucinous. sent18: if there is something such that that it is a hoopoe and/or does not harry Olivier is wrong the newswoman is not mucinous. sent19: the partridge harries Olivier if the soundbox is a kind of a hoopoe. sent20: if the galleon does not bedew peopled then the fact that either the plastique bedew peopled or it does not harry geneva or both is incorrect. sent21: the partridge does harry geneva. sent22: if there exists something such that the fact that it is mucinous and/or does not bedew peopled does not hold the newswoman does not harry Olivier. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the galleon does bedew peopled.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the newswoman is mucinous.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the newswoman is not mucinous hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the galleon does not bedew peopled.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: that the plastique does bedew peopled and/or it does not harry geneva is not right.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that either it does bedew peopled or it does not harry geneva or both does not hold.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the soundbox does not harry Olivier.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: that the partridge harries Olivier and is a hoopoe does not hold.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__