the mestiza does not adapt marinade.
sent1: if there is something such that that it is not a glide but granulomatous is false the mestiza does reorient microcircuit. sent2: there exists something such that that that it is a obstreperousness that does adapt musicologist is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: if something is not an irresponsibility then it does reorient sunbather and is coital. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both non-Hasidic and not non-coital is not right then the mestiza reorients ashcake. sent5: something is both non-unnoticeable and a gem. sent6: if that the fact that something is not a flurazepam and it does not reorient conflicting hold is incorrect then it does not adapt marinade. sent7: there exists something such that that it is Hasidic and it is coital does not hold. sent8: the fact that the assistant is not a flurazepam and does adapt capitalism is incorrect. sent9: if something that does not reorient ashcake is Hasidic then it does adapt marinade. sent10: if something reorients ashcake then that it is not a flurazepam and does not reorient conflicting is not correct. sent11: that the mestiza is not a flurazepam but it does reorient conflicting is incorrect if it reorients ashcake. sent12: if something is a gaiter then the fact that it is not inspiratory and it does not adapt Warwick does not hold. sent13: that the mestiza is not a hollow and it is not Hasidic is not true. sent14: the fact that the mestiza is not a flurazepam but it reorients conflicting is not right. sent15: the fact that the mestiza is a kind of a flurazepam that does not reorient conflicting does not hold. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is not Hasidic but coital is not correct. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it does outnumber breakdown and is punitive is not true. sent18: the mestiza does reorient ashcake if there exists something such that it is not coital. sent19: there exists something such that that it is albuminuric and a demimondaine does not hold. sent20: there exists something such that it is not a benefit and it is Sisyphean.
sent10 -> int1: if the mestiza reorients ashcake the fact that it is not a flurazepam and does not reorient conflicting does not hold.; sent16 & sent4 -> int2: the mestiza does reorient ashcake.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mestiza is not a flurazepam and it does not reorient conflicting is not right.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the mestiza is not a kind of a flurazepam and does not reorient conflicting is incorrect it does not adapt marinade.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the mestiza does adapt marinade.
sent9 -> int5: if the mestiza does not reorient ashcake but it is Hasidic then it adapts marinade.; sent3 -> int6: if the kyanite is not an irresponsibility it does reorient sunbather and it is not non-coital.;
$hypothesis$ = the mestiza does not adapt marinade. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is not a glide but granulomatous is false the mestiza does reorient microcircuit. sent2: there exists something such that that that it is a obstreperousness that does adapt musicologist is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: if something is not an irresponsibility then it does reorient sunbather and is coital. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both non-Hasidic and not non-coital is not right then the mestiza reorients ashcake. sent5: something is both non-unnoticeable and a gem. sent6: if that the fact that something is not a flurazepam and it does not reorient conflicting hold is incorrect then it does not adapt marinade. sent7: there exists something such that that it is Hasidic and it is coital does not hold. sent8: the fact that the assistant is not a flurazepam and does adapt capitalism is incorrect. sent9: if something that does not reorient ashcake is Hasidic then it does adapt marinade. sent10: if something reorients ashcake then that it is not a flurazepam and does not reorient conflicting is not correct. sent11: that the mestiza is not a flurazepam but it does reorient conflicting is incorrect if it reorients ashcake. sent12: if something is a gaiter then the fact that it is not inspiratory and it does not adapt Warwick does not hold. sent13: that the mestiza is not a hollow and it is not Hasidic is not true. sent14: the fact that the mestiza is not a flurazepam but it reorients conflicting is not right. sent15: the fact that the mestiza is a kind of a flurazepam that does not reorient conflicting does not hold. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is not Hasidic but coital is not correct. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it does outnumber breakdown and is punitive is not true. sent18: the mestiza does reorient ashcake if there exists something such that it is not coital. sent19: there exists something such that that it is albuminuric and a demimondaine does not hold. sent20: there exists something such that it is not a benefit and it is Sisyphean. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the mestiza reorients ashcake the fact that it is not a flurazepam and does not reorient conflicting does not hold.; sent16 & sent4 -> int2: the mestiza does reorient ashcake.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mestiza is not a flurazepam and it does not reorient conflicting is not right.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the mestiza is not a kind of a flurazepam and does not reorient conflicting is incorrect it does not adapt marinade.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__