the chute is not a Calophyllum and scends.
sent1: something fudges flagpole. sent2: the Islay is not a kind of a Calophyllum if the fact that there exists something such that that the fact that it does fudge flagpole and does not beat paleolith is true is not correct is correct. sent3: the oldwife is not apologetics. sent4: if there exists something such that it fudges flagpole and does not beat paleolith the oldwife is a formulary. sent5: there exists something such that it does not fudge brooklet. sent6: the fact that the fact that the oldwife is a Calophyllum and it is formulary is not false does not hold if the fact that it is not apologetics is not wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that that it fudges brooklet is false then the oldwife is not a formulary. sent8: that the chute is not a Calophyllum but it scends is not correct if the Islay is not a kind of a Calophyllum. sent9: there is something such that it is a Calophyllum and does not beat paleolith.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uropygium fudges flagpole and does not beat paleolith.; assump1 -> int1: something fudges flagpole but it does not beat paleolith.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the oldwife is a kind of a formulary.; sent5 & sent7 -> int3: the oldwife is not a formulary.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that that the uropygium fudges flagpole and does not beat paleolith is not incorrect does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it fudges flagpole and does not beat paleolith does not hold.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the Islay is not a Calophyllum.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the chute is not a Calophyllum and does scend.
sent6 & sent3 -> int8: that the oldwife is a Calophyllum and a formulary is not true.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Calophyllum and it is a formulary does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the chute is not a Calophyllum and scends. ; $context$ = sent1: something fudges flagpole. sent2: the Islay is not a kind of a Calophyllum if the fact that there exists something such that that the fact that it does fudge flagpole and does not beat paleolith is true is not correct is correct. sent3: the oldwife is not apologetics. sent4: if there exists something such that it fudges flagpole and does not beat paleolith the oldwife is a formulary. sent5: there exists something such that it does not fudge brooklet. sent6: the fact that the fact that the oldwife is a Calophyllum and it is formulary is not false does not hold if the fact that it is not apologetics is not wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that that it fudges brooklet is false then the oldwife is not a formulary. sent8: that the chute is not a Calophyllum but it scends is not correct if the Islay is not a kind of a Calophyllum. sent9: there is something such that it is a Calophyllum and does not beat paleolith. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uropygium fudges flagpole and does not beat paleolith.; assump1 -> int1: something fudges flagpole but it does not beat paleolith.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the oldwife is a kind of a formulary.; sent5 & sent7 -> int3: the oldwife is not a formulary.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that that the uropygium fudges flagpole and does not beat paleolith is not incorrect does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it fudges flagpole and does not beat paleolith does not hold.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the Islay is not a Calophyllum.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__