the negotiating Percophidae does not occur.
sent1: the calcifugousness occurs if the opening happens. sent2: if the weediness happens then the unangriness happens. sent3: that the allopathicness happens causes the unitariness. sent4: that the fact that the thriving happens and the purring happens is not wrong is not correct. sent5: if the soldiering vesicle does not occur then the fact that not the snatching but the isomericness occurs is false. sent6: the gobbling occurs. sent7: if the fact that not the snatch but the isomericness happens is incorrect then the weediness occurs. sent8: if the fact that the exacerbation does not occur and the trisecting lumberjack occurs does not hold then the exegeticness occurs. sent9: the chiromanticness happens. sent10: the soldiering self-assertion does not occur. sent11: if the hydrousness happens then the fact that the trisecting bale does not occur and the flame-out does not occur does not hold. sent12: the fact that the operculateness happens and the slanting occurs does not hold if the negotiating Holcus does not occur. sent13: that the trisecting climber does not occur causes that the saving occurs and the effusing occurs. sent14: if the unangriness occurs then the unscalableness happens. sent15: the soldiering vesicle does not occur if that the trisecting xylem occurs and the Chase occurs is not correct. sent16: the unitariness happens. sent17: the soldiering vesicle does not occur if the Chase does not occur. sent18: if the negotiating Percophidae does not occur then the fact that the trisecting xylem and the Chase happens is not right. sent19: that the Sin occurs and the hydrousness occurs is brought about by that the soldiering self-assertion does not occur. sent20: that the trisecting rockabilly does not occur is prevented by that the trisecting privation happens. sent21: if the preserving does not occur the precocialness happens. sent22: the percussing occurs if the weeds occurs. sent23: if the fact that the trisecting bale does not occur and the flame-out does not occur is false the unscalableness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the negotiating Percophidae does not occur is right.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that both the trisecting xylem and the Chase occurs is incorrect hold.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the soldiering vesicle does not occur hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that not the snatching but the isomericness occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the weediness happens.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the unangriness happens hold.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the unscalableness occurs.; sent19 & sent10 -> int7: the Sin occurs and the hydrousness happens.; int7 -> int8: the hydrousness happens.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: that the trisecting bale does not occur and the flame-out does not occur is not correct.; sent23 & int9 -> int10: the unscalableness does not occur.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the negotiating Percophidae does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the calcifugousness occurs if the opening happens. sent2: if the weediness happens then the unangriness happens. sent3: that the allopathicness happens causes the unitariness. sent4: that the fact that the thriving happens and the purring happens is not wrong is not correct. sent5: if the soldiering vesicle does not occur then the fact that not the snatching but the isomericness occurs is false. sent6: the gobbling occurs. sent7: if the fact that not the snatch but the isomericness happens is incorrect then the weediness occurs. sent8: if the fact that the exacerbation does not occur and the trisecting lumberjack occurs does not hold then the exegeticness occurs. sent9: the chiromanticness happens. sent10: the soldiering self-assertion does not occur. sent11: if the hydrousness happens then the fact that the trisecting bale does not occur and the flame-out does not occur does not hold. sent12: the fact that the operculateness happens and the slanting occurs does not hold if the negotiating Holcus does not occur. sent13: that the trisecting climber does not occur causes that the saving occurs and the effusing occurs. sent14: if the unangriness occurs then the unscalableness happens. sent15: the soldiering vesicle does not occur if that the trisecting xylem occurs and the Chase occurs is not correct. sent16: the unitariness happens. sent17: the soldiering vesicle does not occur if the Chase does not occur. sent18: if the negotiating Percophidae does not occur then the fact that the trisecting xylem and the Chase happens is not right. sent19: that the Sin occurs and the hydrousness occurs is brought about by that the soldiering self-assertion does not occur. sent20: that the trisecting rockabilly does not occur is prevented by that the trisecting privation happens. sent21: if the preserving does not occur the precocialness happens. sent22: the percussing occurs if the weeds occurs. sent23: if the fact that the trisecting bale does not occur and the flame-out does not occur is false the unscalableness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the negotiating Percophidae does not occur is right.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that both the trisecting xylem and the Chase occurs is incorrect hold.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the soldiering vesicle does not occur hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that not the snatching but the isomericness occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the weediness happens.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the unangriness happens hold.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the unscalableness occurs.; sent19 & sent10 -> int7: the Sin occurs and the hydrousness happens.; int7 -> int8: the hydrousness happens.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: that the trisecting bale does not occur and the flame-out does not occur is not correct.; sent23 & int9 -> int10: the unscalableness does not occur.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__