the fact that the afferent is bibliomaniacal is true.
sent1: the furring is a kind of a Neofiber if that it does force phenylephrine and it does not vault Eiffel is not right. sent2: the fact that the cookbook is resolute but it is not hadal is not correct. sent3: that the afferent vaults tribalization and does not force furring does not hold. sent4: the fact that the brazil is a Woodbury is not false. sent5: the afferent does converge. sent6: if something is viral the fact that it is bibliomaniacal is not incorrect. sent7: if the afferent is a octopod that it is viral is not wrong. sent8: the afferent is a primidone. sent9: the fact that the afferent is a Woodbury and is a octopod does not hold. sent10: the chit does not converge and it is not a dialectic if the fact that something is not trabecular hold. sent11: something buds if that it forces hostess and is non-algoid does not hold. sent12: the claustrum is not trabecular. sent13: if that something is a Woodbury but not viral is not correct it does converge. sent14: something is viral if the fact that it is a kind of a Woodbury that is not a octopod does not hold. sent15: if the afferent converges that it is a Woodbury and it is a octopod is wrong. sent16: that the afferent is a kind of a Woodbury but it is not a kind of a octopod does not hold if it converges. sent17: if the fact that the afferent purifies pacemaker and does not scourge uplift does not hold the fact that it does converge hold.
sent16 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the afferent is a Woodbury but it is not a kind of a octopod is false.; sent14 -> int2: the afferent is viral if the fact that it is a Woodbury and it is not a octopod is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the afferent is viral.; sent6 -> int4: that the afferent is bibliomaniacal is true if the fact that it is viral is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the afferent is not bibliomaniacal.
sent12 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not trabecular.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the chit does not converge and it is not a dialectic.; int6 -> int7: the chit does not converge.; int7 -> int8: something does not converge.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the afferent is bibliomaniacal is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the furring is a kind of a Neofiber if that it does force phenylephrine and it does not vault Eiffel is not right. sent2: the fact that the cookbook is resolute but it is not hadal is not correct. sent3: that the afferent vaults tribalization and does not force furring does not hold. sent4: the fact that the brazil is a Woodbury is not false. sent5: the afferent does converge. sent6: if something is viral the fact that it is bibliomaniacal is not incorrect. sent7: if the afferent is a octopod that it is viral is not wrong. sent8: the afferent is a primidone. sent9: the fact that the afferent is a Woodbury and is a octopod does not hold. sent10: the chit does not converge and it is not a dialectic if the fact that something is not trabecular hold. sent11: something buds if that it forces hostess and is non-algoid does not hold. sent12: the claustrum is not trabecular. sent13: if that something is a Woodbury but not viral is not correct it does converge. sent14: something is viral if the fact that it is a kind of a Woodbury that is not a octopod does not hold. sent15: if the afferent converges that it is a Woodbury and it is a octopod is wrong. sent16: that the afferent is a kind of a Woodbury but it is not a kind of a octopod does not hold if it converges. sent17: if the fact that the afferent purifies pacemaker and does not scourge uplift does not hold the fact that it does converge hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the afferent is a Woodbury but it is not a kind of a octopod is false.; sent14 -> int2: the afferent is viral if the fact that it is a Woodbury and it is not a octopod is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the afferent is viral.; sent6 -> int4: that the afferent is bibliomaniacal is true if the fact that it is viral is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__