there exists something such that if it gets Cancridae that it is not fallible and does angle sarcoma does not hold.
sent1: something is not diachronic but it does angle venography if it is compatible. sent2: something is not a Trionyx and is a year if it is a kind of a bannock. sent3: there exists something such that if it is alkaline that it is not a lurker and it is paleolithic is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is Russian then it is a kind of non-prelapsarian thing that is a slowness. sent5: there is something such that if it does boast then the fact that it is both sarcastic and a pro is false. sent6: the fact that the cornice is a kind of better thing that does overtake is incorrect if it reddens cycling. sent7: there exists something such that if it is punitive then that it is non-endometrial thing that does redden pushover is not right. sent8: the cornice is not a kind of a dynamic but it reddens smuttiness if it angles sarcoma. sent9: that the cornice does get sighting and it is diachronic does not hold if it does wet. sent10: that the cornice does not get Cancridae and is thalamocortical does not hold if it is moonless. sent11: something does not get Connecticut and is a skinny if it is a kind of a tearjerker. sent12: if something reddens annuitant then that it does not angle cedarbird and is a spandrel is false. sent13: the fact that the cornice is not a 1-dodecanol and is atherosclerotic is incorrect if it overpays. sent14: there exists something such that if it is sepaloid then the fact that it is not aft and it is apneic is not correct. sent15: that something does redden cubbyhole and is Aleutians is not correct if that it is a Dianthus is not incorrect. sent16: if the papyrus angles pa'anga that it does not angle sarcoma and it is a gladiator is not true. sent17: there is something such that if it is an autoclave that it is susceptible and it is a headmistressship is false. sent18: the fact that the cornice is not a coin and angles sarcoma is wrong if it does redden Pipilo. sent19: the fact that something is infallible thing that does angle sarcoma is false if it gets Cancridae. sent20: the fact that the cornice does not redden racing and does angle sarcoma does not hold if it is a kind of a beneficiary.
sent19 -> int1: the fact that the cornice is not fallible but it does angle sarcoma does not hold if it does get Cancridae.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it gets Cancridae that it is not fallible and does angle sarcoma does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not diachronic but it does angle venography if it is compatible. sent2: something is not a Trionyx and is a year if it is a kind of a bannock. sent3: there exists something such that if it is alkaline that it is not a lurker and it is paleolithic is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is Russian then it is a kind of non-prelapsarian thing that is a slowness. sent5: there is something such that if it does boast then the fact that it is both sarcastic and a pro is false. sent6: the fact that the cornice is a kind of better thing that does overtake is incorrect if it reddens cycling. sent7: there exists something such that if it is punitive then that it is non-endometrial thing that does redden pushover is not right. sent8: the cornice is not a kind of a dynamic but it reddens smuttiness if it angles sarcoma. sent9: that the cornice does get sighting and it is diachronic does not hold if it does wet. sent10: that the cornice does not get Cancridae and is thalamocortical does not hold if it is moonless. sent11: something does not get Connecticut and is a skinny if it is a kind of a tearjerker. sent12: if something reddens annuitant then that it does not angle cedarbird and is a spandrel is false. sent13: the fact that the cornice is not a 1-dodecanol and is atherosclerotic is incorrect if it overpays. sent14: there exists something such that if it is sepaloid then the fact that it is not aft and it is apneic is not correct. sent15: that something does redden cubbyhole and is Aleutians is not correct if that it is a Dianthus is not incorrect. sent16: if the papyrus angles pa'anga that it does not angle sarcoma and it is a gladiator is not true. sent17: there is something such that if it is an autoclave that it is susceptible and it is a headmistressship is false. sent18: the fact that the cornice is not a coin and angles sarcoma is wrong if it does redden Pipilo. sent19: the fact that something is infallible thing that does angle sarcoma is false if it gets Cancridae. sent20: the fact that the cornice does not redden racing and does angle sarcoma does not hold if it is a kind of a beneficiary. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the fact that the cornice is not fallible but it does angle sarcoma does not hold if it does get Cancridae.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__