the fact that the fact that the choke does not trice waitress and is a kind of a backstroker is correct does not hold.
sent1: the choke is not a crochet but it dims punt. sent2: that the polemonium is not a macron and it is not a kind of a Ovrette is not right if it tongues. sent3: if something is not a catamountain then it does not trice waitress. sent4: if something does not veil poniard it is not a catamountain. sent5: something that is a Colchicum is a tongue. sent6: if that the interrupt confronts and does crochet is not right the fluoroboride is not a crochet. sent7: if something is not isopteran then it is not a orientalist and it does dim Heyerdahl. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not confront the fact that the interrupt confront and is a crochet is false. sent9: if that the Macon is not a crochet and is not a loupe does not hold it is not disobedient. sent10: the fact that the Macon is not disobedient is correct if it is a loupe. sent11: if the choke does not veil poniard then that it is not disobedient is true. sent12: if something is a catamountain it is not disobedient. sent13: if the fact that the polemonium is not a macron and is not a kind of a Ovrette is not right then the PC does not confront. sent14: if something is a loupe then it is not disobedient. sent15: if the choke is not a catamountain then it does not trice waitress. sent16: everything is a kind of a Colchicum. sent17: something is not awkward but it veils precaution if it is not a dryer. sent18: that the Macon is a kind of non-katharobic thing that does not occult stenography is wrong. sent19: that the Macon is both not a crochet and not a loupe is incorrect. sent20: the interleukin is a loupe and/or a catamountain if the fluoroboride is not a crochet. sent21: if there is something such that it is not a backstroker then the fact that the choke does not trice waitress but it is a kind of a backstroker is false. sent22: something does not trice waitress but it is a backstroker if it is not a catamountain. sent23: the choke is not a kind of a crochet. sent24: the methacholine does not trice waitress. sent25: if the fact that the choke does veil poniard is not wrong then the Macon is disobedient.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the choke does veil poniard.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the Macon is disobedient.; sent9 & sent19 -> int2: the Macon is not disobedient.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the choke does not veil poniard.; sent4 -> int5: the choke is not a catamountain if it does not veil poniard.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the choke is not a catamountain.; sent22 -> int7: the choke does not trice waitress and is a kind of a backstroker if it is not a kind of a catamountain.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the choke does not trice waitress and is a backstroker is not right.
sent12 -> int8: if the fact that the interleukin is a catamountain hold then it is not disobedient.; sent5 -> int9: the bombsight tongues if it is a Colchicum.; sent16 -> int10: the bombsight is a Colchicum.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that the bombsight is a kind of a tongue is not false.; int11 -> int12: everything tongues.; int12 -> int13: that the polemonium is a tongue is correct.; int13 & sent2 -> int14: that the polemonium is not a macron and it is not a Ovrette is not correct.; sent13 & int14 -> int15: the PC does not confront.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it does not confront.; sent8 & int16 -> int17: that the interrupt does confront and it does crochet is wrong.; int17 & sent6 -> int18: the fluoroboride is not a crochet.; sent20 & int18 -> int19: the interleukin is either a loupe or a catamountain or both.; sent14 -> int20: the interleukin is not disobedient if it is a loupe.; int8 & int19 & int20 -> int21: the interleukin is not disobedient.; int21 -> int22: there is something such that it is not disobedient.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the choke does not trice waitress and is a kind of a backstroker is correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the choke is not a crochet but it dims punt. sent2: that the polemonium is not a macron and it is not a kind of a Ovrette is not right if it tongues. sent3: if something is not a catamountain then it does not trice waitress. sent4: if something does not veil poniard it is not a catamountain. sent5: something that is a Colchicum is a tongue. sent6: if that the interrupt confronts and does crochet is not right the fluoroboride is not a crochet. sent7: if something is not isopteran then it is not a orientalist and it does dim Heyerdahl. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not confront the fact that the interrupt confront and is a crochet is false. sent9: if that the Macon is not a crochet and is not a loupe does not hold it is not disobedient. sent10: the fact that the Macon is not disobedient is correct if it is a loupe. sent11: if the choke does not veil poniard then that it is not disobedient is true. sent12: if something is a catamountain it is not disobedient. sent13: if the fact that the polemonium is not a macron and is not a kind of a Ovrette is not right then the PC does not confront. sent14: if something is a loupe then it is not disobedient. sent15: if the choke is not a catamountain then it does not trice waitress. sent16: everything is a kind of a Colchicum. sent17: something is not awkward but it veils precaution if it is not a dryer. sent18: that the Macon is a kind of non-katharobic thing that does not occult stenography is wrong. sent19: that the Macon is both not a crochet and not a loupe is incorrect. sent20: the interleukin is a loupe and/or a catamountain if the fluoroboride is not a crochet. sent21: if there is something such that it is not a backstroker then the fact that the choke does not trice waitress but it is a kind of a backstroker is false. sent22: something does not trice waitress but it is a backstroker if it is not a catamountain. sent23: the choke is not a kind of a crochet. sent24: the methacholine does not trice waitress. sent25: if the fact that the choke does veil poniard is not wrong then the Macon is disobedient. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the choke does veil poniard.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the Macon is disobedient.; sent9 & sent19 -> int2: the Macon is not disobedient.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the choke does not veil poniard.; sent4 -> int5: the choke is not a catamountain if it does not veil poniard.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the choke is not a catamountain.; sent22 -> int7: the choke does not trice waitress and is a kind of a backstroker if it is not a kind of a catamountain.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__