that if the caltrop is controversial then that the coupe is not a kind of a perimysium and does not add Hyoscyamus is not correct is wrong.
sent1: if the coupe does not manhandle paranoia then the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia and is not a perimysium. sent2: if something is same the fact that it is uncontroversial is true. sent3: if something does not manhandle paranoia and is not same then it is not a kind of a perimysium. sent4: the fact that the aculeus is not a drawee but it is a Missourian is wrong if it does not grumble coolie. sent5: if the Ni-resist does not add Hyoscyamus then the fact that the coupe does add Hyoscyamus but it is not same is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the coupe is a perimysium but it does not add Hyoscyamus is not true. sent7: the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia if the caltrop is not same. sent8: if something is a kind of a determent but it is not a dishonor the aculeus does not grumble coolie. sent9: something is not a perimysium or is not same or both if it manhandles paranoia. sent10: the fact that the fact that the coupe is a perimysium but it does not add Hyoscyamus does not hold is right if the Ni-resist is not a perimysium. sent11: that the coupe is not a perimysium and it does not add Hyoscyamus is right. sent12: the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia. sent13: if the Ni-resist does manhandle paranoia and is not same then it is not a kind of a perimysium. sent14: the bister is not a perimysium. sent15: there exists something such that it is a determent and is not a dishonor. sent16: if the Ni-resist is not a perimysium then that the coupe is not a kind of a perimysium and it does not add Hyoscyamus does not hold. sent17: the coupe is non-same thing that does not add Hyoscyamus. sent18: if the caltrop is not uncontroversial then the coupe is not a perimysium and does not add Hyoscyamus. sent19: if the caltrop is not same the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia and is not same. sent20: if something that does manhandle paranoia is not same it is not a kind of a perimysium. sent21: the Ni-resist is not uncontroversial if the fact that it is not same and it does manhandle paranoia is true. sent22: the fact that the Ni-resist is a kind of controversial thing that is not same is not right if the caltrop is not a kind of a perimysium. sent23: the Ni-resist is uncontroversial and/or it is probabilistic if the coupe does not add Hyoscyamus.
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the caltrop is same is correct then it is uncontroversial.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the caltrop is same.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the caltrop is uncontroversial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caltrop is not uncontroversial.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the caltrop is not same.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia and is not same.; sent3 -> int6: the Ni-resist is not a perimysium if it does not manhandle paranoia and is not same.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Ni-resist is not a perimysium.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: that the coupe is not a perimysium and does not add Hyoscyamus does not hold.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the caltrop is not a perimysium.
sent9 -> int9: the caltrop is not a perimysium and/or is not same if it manhandles paranoia.; sent15 & sent8 -> int10: the aculeus does not grumble coolie.; sent4 & int10 -> int11: the fact that that the aculeus is not a kind of a drawee but it is a Missourian hold is not correct.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is not a drawee and is a Missourian is false.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the caltrop is controversial then that the coupe is not a kind of a perimysium and does not add Hyoscyamus is not correct is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the coupe does not manhandle paranoia then the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia and is not a perimysium. sent2: if something is same the fact that it is uncontroversial is true. sent3: if something does not manhandle paranoia and is not same then it is not a kind of a perimysium. sent4: the fact that the aculeus is not a drawee but it is a Missourian is wrong if it does not grumble coolie. sent5: if the Ni-resist does not add Hyoscyamus then the fact that the coupe does add Hyoscyamus but it is not same is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the coupe is a perimysium but it does not add Hyoscyamus is not true. sent7: the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia if the caltrop is not same. sent8: if something is a kind of a determent but it is not a dishonor the aculeus does not grumble coolie. sent9: something is not a perimysium or is not same or both if it manhandles paranoia. sent10: the fact that the fact that the coupe is a perimysium but it does not add Hyoscyamus does not hold is right if the Ni-resist is not a perimysium. sent11: that the coupe is not a perimysium and it does not add Hyoscyamus is right. sent12: the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia. sent13: if the Ni-resist does manhandle paranoia and is not same then it is not a kind of a perimysium. sent14: the bister is not a perimysium. sent15: there exists something such that it is a determent and is not a dishonor. sent16: if the Ni-resist is not a perimysium then that the coupe is not a kind of a perimysium and it does not add Hyoscyamus does not hold. sent17: the coupe is non-same thing that does not add Hyoscyamus. sent18: if the caltrop is not uncontroversial then the coupe is not a perimysium and does not add Hyoscyamus. sent19: if the caltrop is not same the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia and is not same. sent20: if something that does manhandle paranoia is not same it is not a kind of a perimysium. sent21: the Ni-resist is not uncontroversial if the fact that it is not same and it does manhandle paranoia is true. sent22: the fact that the Ni-resist is a kind of controversial thing that is not same is not right if the caltrop is not a kind of a perimysium. sent23: the Ni-resist is uncontroversial and/or it is probabilistic if the coupe does not add Hyoscyamus. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the caltrop is same is correct then it is uncontroversial.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the caltrop is same.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the caltrop is uncontroversial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caltrop is not uncontroversial.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the caltrop is not same.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the Ni-resist does not manhandle paranoia and is not same.; sent3 -> int6: the Ni-resist is not a perimysium if it does not manhandle paranoia and is not same.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Ni-resist is not a perimysium.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: that the coupe is not a perimysium and does not add Hyoscyamus does not hold.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__