the Nebraskan is not a Ukrainian.
sent1: the fish-fly decks Lithuanian if the cocotte is binary. sent2: something does hoodoo Czestochowa but it is not a gnomon. sent3: the fact that something is not a kind of a grimace and it is not a antidiuretic is not right if it is a bluefin. sent4: if the fact that the lizardfish is not a grimace and it is not a antidiuretic is not true then the Lithuanian is not a antidiuretic. sent5: that the itinerant is not Monacan but it is a Monophysite is not right. sent6: there is something such that it is an exclusive but not a faultlessness. sent7: the Nebraskan is not a kind of a Ukrainian if there is something such that the fact that it is inexplicable and it is not a gnomon is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is inexplicable and it is a gnomon is false. sent9: the lizardfish is a bluefin if the fish-fly decks Lithuanian. sent10: the fact that the ram is Ukrainian if that the Menorah does not down Rhus and it is not a Ukrainian is wrong hold. sent11: the itinerant is not a Monophysite if that it is not Monacan and it is a kind of a Monophysite does not hold. sent12: the fact that the fact that the Lithuanian is both inexplicable and a gnomon is not true is right. sent13: if something is a gnomon then the Nebraskan is not Ukrainian. sent14: The Czestochowa does hoodoo Menorah. sent15: if the Menorah hoodoos Czestochowa then the fact that the Lithuanian is both inexplicable and a gnomon is wrong. sent16: something is inexplicable and is not a kind of a gnomon. sent17: something is not non-Ukrainian and it does hoodoo Czestochowa if it does not down Rhus. sent18: the Menorah does hoodoo Czestochowa. sent19: if that the Lithuanian is not a antidiuretic is not false that the Menorah does habituate and is not a fluorine does not hold. sent20: the Lithuanian does not hoodoo Czestochowa if there is something such that it is a kind of a gnomon. sent21: a Ukrainian does hoodoo Czestochowa. sent22: if the itinerant is not a Monophysite then the cocotte is a thirteen and is a binary.
the Nebraskan is Ukrainian.
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the Nebraskan does not down Rhus is correct then it is Ukrainian thing that does hoodoo Czestochowa.; sent3 -> int2: if the lizardfish is a bluefin that that it does not grimace and is not a kind of a antidiuretic hold is not correct.; sent11 & sent5 -> int3: the itinerant is not a Monophysite.; sent22 & int3 -> int4: the cocotte is a thirteen and is a binary.; int4 -> int5: the cocotte is not non-binary.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the fish-fly does deck Lithuanian.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the lizardfish is a bluefin.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the fact that that the lizardfish is not a kind of a grimace and is not a kind of a antidiuretic is not false is not right.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the Lithuanian is not a kind of a antidiuretic.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: that the Menorah does habituate but it is not a fluorine is wrong.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it does habituate and it is not a fluorine is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Nebraskan is not a Ukrainian. ; $context$ = sent1: the fish-fly decks Lithuanian if the cocotte is binary. sent2: something does hoodoo Czestochowa but it is not a gnomon. sent3: the fact that something is not a kind of a grimace and it is not a antidiuretic is not right if it is a bluefin. sent4: if the fact that the lizardfish is not a grimace and it is not a antidiuretic is not true then the Lithuanian is not a antidiuretic. sent5: that the itinerant is not Monacan but it is a Monophysite is not right. sent6: there is something such that it is an exclusive but not a faultlessness. sent7: the Nebraskan is not a kind of a Ukrainian if there is something such that the fact that it is inexplicable and it is not a gnomon is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is inexplicable and it is a gnomon is false. sent9: the lizardfish is a bluefin if the fish-fly decks Lithuanian. sent10: the fact that the ram is Ukrainian if that the Menorah does not down Rhus and it is not a Ukrainian is wrong hold. sent11: the itinerant is not a Monophysite if that it is not Monacan and it is a kind of a Monophysite does not hold. sent12: the fact that the fact that the Lithuanian is both inexplicable and a gnomon is not true is right. sent13: if something is a gnomon then the Nebraskan is not Ukrainian. sent14: The Czestochowa does hoodoo Menorah. sent15: if the Menorah hoodoos Czestochowa then the fact that the Lithuanian is both inexplicable and a gnomon is wrong. sent16: something is inexplicable and is not a kind of a gnomon. sent17: something is not non-Ukrainian and it does hoodoo Czestochowa if it does not down Rhus. sent18: the Menorah does hoodoo Czestochowa. sent19: if that the Lithuanian is not a antidiuretic is not false that the Menorah does habituate and is not a fluorine does not hold. sent20: the Lithuanian does not hoodoo Czestochowa if there is something such that it is a kind of a gnomon. sent21: a Ukrainian does hoodoo Czestochowa. sent22: if the itinerant is not a Monophysite then the cocotte is a thirteen and is a binary. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__