the fact that the squash is a kind of non-Noachian thing that is a Vladivostok does not hold.
sent1: that there is something such that that it is a kind of nontaxable thing that is not improvident is wrong hold. sent2: if the squash is not Noachian or it is not improvident or both then it is Noachian. sent3: the squash is a kind of improvident thing that does prioritize chevre if that the upstager is not nontaxable is not false. sent4: that the step does not prioritize filter and is isentropic is not right if there is something such that it is not provident. sent5: the upstager does not prioritize chevre if there exists something such that it is improvident. sent6: if the astrocyte is not taxable the chevre is taxable. sent7: if the squash is a kind of non-Noachian thing that is a Vladivostok then the upstager prioritizes chevre. sent8: the squash is a Vladivostok. sent9: if there is something such that that it is nontaxable and not improvident is not right the upstager does not prioritize chevre. sent10: something is both not taxable and not improvident. sent11: something is nontaxable thing that does not lose colony if it does lose triskaidekaphobia. sent12: the fact that the astrocyte loses triskaidekaphobia is not incorrect if the fact that it is an anathema is true. sent13: there exists something such that that it is nontaxable and it is improvident does not hold. sent14: the astrocyte is a kind of an anathema and it persists pomelo.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the squash is both not Noachian and a Vladivostok.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the upstager prioritizes chevre.; sent1 & sent9 -> int2: the upstager does not prioritize chevre.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the squash is not Noachian and is a Vladivostok.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the squash is a kind of non-Noachian thing that is a Vladivostok does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that there is something such that that it is a kind of nontaxable thing that is not improvident is wrong hold. sent2: if the squash is not Noachian or it is not improvident or both then it is Noachian. sent3: the squash is a kind of improvident thing that does prioritize chevre if that the upstager is not nontaxable is not false. sent4: that the step does not prioritize filter and is isentropic is not right if there is something such that it is not provident. sent5: the upstager does not prioritize chevre if there exists something such that it is improvident. sent6: if the astrocyte is not taxable the chevre is taxable. sent7: if the squash is a kind of non-Noachian thing that is a Vladivostok then the upstager prioritizes chevre. sent8: the squash is a Vladivostok. sent9: if there is something such that that it is nontaxable and not improvident is not right the upstager does not prioritize chevre. sent10: something is both not taxable and not improvident. sent11: something is nontaxable thing that does not lose colony if it does lose triskaidekaphobia. sent12: the fact that the astrocyte loses triskaidekaphobia is not incorrect if the fact that it is an anathema is true. sent13: there exists something such that that it is nontaxable and it is improvident does not hold. sent14: the astrocyte is a kind of an anathema and it persists pomelo. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the squash is both not Noachian and a Vladivostok.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the upstager prioritizes chevre.; sent1 & sent9 -> int2: the upstager does not prioritize chevre.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__