there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Waco then it either is not a kind of a Sikkim or does not preempt missing or both.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it does exceed Muscidae is not incorrect then it is a kind of a imago or it does not preempt tenterhook or both. sent2: if the fomentation is chaetal then it does not jellify Woollcott or it is a kind of a Waco or both. sent3: there is something such that if it is experiential then it is not a colonic or is not a kind of a interpenetration or both. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a electroencephalograph then it either is a kind of a opsonization or is not aboriginal or both. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Waco it is a Sikkim and/or does not preempt missing. sent6: the metalware does not preempt missing and/or it is not hydrocephalic if it is a permanent. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a taster it is not a kind of a shadow and/or is miotic. sent8: the fomentation is a Waco and/or it is not a kind of a opsonization if it is a kind of a reflector. sent9: there is something such that if it is starry it either is a interpenetration or is not a stratigraphy or both. sent10: there is something such that if it deems it is not hemic or not a bud or both. sent11: the fomentation does jellify cellblock and/or it is not a Waco if it jellifies market. sent12: either the magician is a kind of a catalase or it is not a shadow or both if it is a Sikkim. sent13: if the hemostat is a kind of a Sikkim it is chemotherapeutic and/or it is not miotic. sent14: there exists something such that if that it does exceed Muscidae is correct the fact that it does not exceed efferent and/or is a culvert hold. sent15: if the fomentation preempts Shakers then it does not singe and/or it is not a Sikkim. sent16: there exists something such that if it is foreleg then either it does not jellify tichodrome or it does jellify angelus or both. sent17: if the fomentation is a Javanthropus then it does not preempt retaliation or preempts missing or both. sent18: if the fomentation is a kind of a Waco either it is not a Sikkim or it does not preempt missing or both. sent19: there is something such that if it is a capacitor then it is unlike and/or it is not a Ecuadorian. sent20: if something is a kind of a jackhammer then it does not jellify Woollcott or is not a culvert or both. sent21: the fact that there exists something such that if it is subsurface it does not preempt Amaranthus or it is a faint or both is true.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a kind of a jackhammer it does not jellify Woollcott and/or it is not a culvert.
sent20 -> int1: if the tichodrome is a jackhammer that it does not jellify Woollcott or it is not a culvert or both is not wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Waco then it either is not a kind of a Sikkim or does not preempt missing or both. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it does exceed Muscidae is not incorrect then it is a kind of a imago or it does not preempt tenterhook or both. sent2: if the fomentation is chaetal then it does not jellify Woollcott or it is a kind of a Waco or both. sent3: there is something such that if it is experiential then it is not a colonic or is not a kind of a interpenetration or both. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a electroencephalograph then it either is a kind of a opsonization or is not aboriginal or both. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Waco it is a Sikkim and/or does not preempt missing. sent6: the metalware does not preempt missing and/or it is not hydrocephalic if it is a permanent. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a taster it is not a kind of a shadow and/or is miotic. sent8: the fomentation is a Waco and/or it is not a kind of a opsonization if it is a kind of a reflector. sent9: there is something such that if it is starry it either is a interpenetration or is not a stratigraphy or both. sent10: there is something such that if it deems it is not hemic or not a bud or both. sent11: the fomentation does jellify cellblock and/or it is not a Waco if it jellifies market. sent12: either the magician is a kind of a catalase or it is not a shadow or both if it is a Sikkim. sent13: if the hemostat is a kind of a Sikkim it is chemotherapeutic and/or it is not miotic. sent14: there exists something such that if that it does exceed Muscidae is correct the fact that it does not exceed efferent and/or is a culvert hold. sent15: if the fomentation preempts Shakers then it does not singe and/or it is not a Sikkim. sent16: there exists something such that if it is foreleg then either it does not jellify tichodrome or it does jellify angelus or both. sent17: if the fomentation is a Javanthropus then it does not preempt retaliation or preempts missing or both. sent18: if the fomentation is a kind of a Waco either it is not a Sikkim or it does not preempt missing or both. sent19: there is something such that if it is a capacitor then it is unlike and/or it is not a Ecuadorian. sent20: if something is a kind of a jackhammer then it does not jellify Woollcott or is not a culvert or both. sent21: the fact that there exists something such that if it is subsurface it does not preempt Amaranthus or it is a faint or both is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__