the tiger is thoughtful.
sent1: something camps aecium but it does not dispatch if it is a kind of a reflexive. sent2: if something dispatches it is not thoughtful. sent3: if that something is onside and/or is not a dispatch is false then it is thoughtful. sent4: if the samurai is uncongenial the fact that it is onside a dispatch is not right. sent5: if something is not onside the fact that it is both not ontogenetic and thoughtful is not true. sent6: that something betters Centrosema and is not a kind of a reflexive is false if it is actinic. sent7: if that the samurai is a kind of non-uncongenial a tetraskelion does not hold then the tiger is a dispatch. sent8: that the samurai is not uncongenial but it is a kind of a tetraskelion does not hold if it is onside. sent9: the tiger is a dispatch if the samurai is not a tetraskelion. sent10: the samurai is a reflexive if there exists something such that that it does better Centrosema and is not a reflexive does not hold. sent11: that the samurai is not non-onside is true.
sent8 & sent11 -> int1: that the samurai is congenial thing that is a tetraskelion does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the tiger dispatches.; sent2 -> int3: if the tiger is a dispatch then that it is not thoughtful is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the tiger is thoughtful.
sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the tiger is onside and/or it is not a kind of a dispatch is false it is thoughtful.;
$hypothesis$ = the tiger is thoughtful. ; $context$ = sent1: something camps aecium but it does not dispatch if it is a kind of a reflexive. sent2: if something dispatches it is not thoughtful. sent3: if that something is onside and/or is not a dispatch is false then it is thoughtful. sent4: if the samurai is uncongenial the fact that it is onside a dispatch is not right. sent5: if something is not onside the fact that it is both not ontogenetic and thoughtful is not true. sent6: that something betters Centrosema and is not a kind of a reflexive is false if it is actinic. sent7: if that the samurai is a kind of non-uncongenial a tetraskelion does not hold then the tiger is a dispatch. sent8: that the samurai is not uncongenial but it is a kind of a tetraskelion does not hold if it is onside. sent9: the tiger is a dispatch if the samurai is not a tetraskelion. sent10: the samurai is a reflexive if there exists something such that that it does better Centrosema and is not a reflexive does not hold. sent11: that the samurai is not non-onside is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent11 -> int1: that the samurai is congenial thing that is a tetraskelion does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the tiger dispatches.; sent2 -> int3: if the tiger is a dispatch then that it is not thoughtful is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__