the princess does not tease meltwater.
sent1: if the banjo is a neurotic then it does not tease scab and does not solemnize entablature. sent2: the fact that there is something such that that it is not a kind of a ramekin and does not tease angulation does not hold is true. sent3: the Gujarati elaborates. sent4: the teashop does tease scab if the gasbag dissonates. sent5: if something elaborates and is not a doom that it does not grass is not incorrect. sent6: the princess does not solemnize entablature and it does not tease meltwater if something teases scab. sent7: the princess does not solemnize entablature if there exists something such that that it does tease scab is not false. sent8: the princess does doom but it does not grass if it does tease meltwater. sent9: a non-fiber-optic favorite is not a disturber. sent10: if something solemnizes entablature the Gujarati does not elaborate and is not a kind of a doom. sent11: if there is something such that it does tease meltwater the princess is not a grass and does not solemnize entablature. sent12: if the gasbag does solemnize tailor that the teashop teases scab is not incorrect. sent13: if something is a kind of a neurotic then the fact that it is a grass is not wrong. sent14: the antler does not tease scab if the banjo does not tease scab and it does not solemnize entablature. sent15: the Gujarati is not non-Prussian. sent16: if the Gujarati is not a protozoologist and it does not tease meltwater then the princess does tease meltwater. sent17: the Gujarati is not unneurotic and it is Prussian. sent18: that the teashop does not dissonate or does not solemnize tailor or both if the antler does not tease scab is correct. sent19: if the Gujarati is not a protozoologist the gasbag dissonates and/or it solemnizes tailor. sent20: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a ramekin and it does not tease angulation is incorrect then the banjo is Prussian. sent21: the princess does not solemnize entablature. sent22: if the Gujarati is a protozoologist that it does elaborate is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gujarati is a kind of a protozoologist.; sent5 -> int1: if the Gujarati elaborates and does not doom then it does not grass.; sent13 -> int2: if the Gujarati is a kind of a neurotic then it does grass.; sent17 -> int3: the Gujarati is a kind of a neurotic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Gujarati does grass.;
the princess teases meltwater.
sent2 & sent20 -> int5: the banjo is a kind of a Prussian.;
$hypothesis$ = the princess does not tease meltwater. ; $context$ = sent1: if the banjo is a neurotic then it does not tease scab and does not solemnize entablature. sent2: the fact that there is something such that that it is not a kind of a ramekin and does not tease angulation does not hold is true. sent3: the Gujarati elaborates. sent4: the teashop does tease scab if the gasbag dissonates. sent5: if something elaborates and is not a doom that it does not grass is not incorrect. sent6: the princess does not solemnize entablature and it does not tease meltwater if something teases scab. sent7: the princess does not solemnize entablature if there exists something such that that it does tease scab is not false. sent8: the princess does doom but it does not grass if it does tease meltwater. sent9: a non-fiber-optic favorite is not a disturber. sent10: if something solemnizes entablature the Gujarati does not elaborate and is not a kind of a doom. sent11: if there is something such that it does tease meltwater the princess is not a grass and does not solemnize entablature. sent12: if the gasbag does solemnize tailor that the teashop teases scab is not incorrect. sent13: if something is a kind of a neurotic then the fact that it is a grass is not wrong. sent14: the antler does not tease scab if the banjo does not tease scab and it does not solemnize entablature. sent15: the Gujarati is not non-Prussian. sent16: if the Gujarati is not a protozoologist and it does not tease meltwater then the princess does tease meltwater. sent17: the Gujarati is not unneurotic and it is Prussian. sent18: that the teashop does not dissonate or does not solemnize tailor or both if the antler does not tease scab is correct. sent19: if the Gujarati is not a protozoologist the gasbag dissonates and/or it solemnizes tailor. sent20: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a ramekin and it does not tease angulation is incorrect then the banjo is Prussian. sent21: the princess does not solemnize entablature. sent22: if the Gujarati is a protozoologist that it does elaborate is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gujarati is a kind of a protozoologist.; sent5 -> int1: if the Gujarati elaborates and does not doom then it does not grass.; sent13 -> int2: if the Gujarati is a kind of a neurotic then it does grass.; sent17 -> int3: the Gujarati is a kind of a neurotic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Gujarati does grass.; __UNKNOWN__