the temperateness occurs.
sent1: the confining benzylpenicillin results in that the protrusion happens and the shooing does not occur. sent2: the confining benzylpenicillin is caused by that the overcoming happens. sent3: that the prioritizing rubefacient does not occur causes that both the temperateness and the persisting alexia occurs. sent4: the powdering happens. sent5: the persisting alexia occurs. sent6: both the persisting alexia and the prioritizing rubefacient happens. sent7: that the philandering and the persisting alexia occurs is caused by that the prioritizing rubefacient does not occur. sent8: if the shooing does not occur then the recording happens and the temperateness occurs. sent9: the fact that if the fact that both the shakedownness and the sternutatoriness happens is not correct then the shakedownness does not occur is true. sent10: if the shooing does not occur then the fact that the shakedownness happens and the sternutatoriness happens is not true. sent11: that the recording does not occur is brought about by that the temperateness and the prioritizing rubefacient happens. sent12: the foliateness does not occur. sent13: both the logogrammaticness and the shooing happens. sent14: the recording happens. sent15: that the shooing does not occur is brought about by that the protrusion happens but the sternutatoriness does not occur. sent16: the non-shakedownness triggers that the recording happens but the prioritizing rubefacient does not occur. sent17: if the prioritizing Proudhon does not occur both the unfitness and the overcoming happens.
sent6 -> int1: the prioritizing rubefacient occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the temperateness occurs is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the temperateness and the prioritizing rubefacient happens.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the recording does not occur.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the temperateness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the temperateness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the confining benzylpenicillin results in that the protrusion happens and the shooing does not occur. sent2: the confining benzylpenicillin is caused by that the overcoming happens. sent3: that the prioritizing rubefacient does not occur causes that both the temperateness and the persisting alexia occurs. sent4: the powdering happens. sent5: the persisting alexia occurs. sent6: both the persisting alexia and the prioritizing rubefacient happens. sent7: that the philandering and the persisting alexia occurs is caused by that the prioritizing rubefacient does not occur. sent8: if the shooing does not occur then the recording happens and the temperateness occurs. sent9: the fact that if the fact that both the shakedownness and the sternutatoriness happens is not correct then the shakedownness does not occur is true. sent10: if the shooing does not occur then the fact that the shakedownness happens and the sternutatoriness happens is not true. sent11: that the recording does not occur is brought about by that the temperateness and the prioritizing rubefacient happens. sent12: the foliateness does not occur. sent13: both the logogrammaticness and the shooing happens. sent14: the recording happens. sent15: that the shooing does not occur is brought about by that the protrusion happens but the sternutatoriness does not occur. sent16: the non-shakedownness triggers that the recording happens but the prioritizing rubefacient does not occur. sent17: if the prioritizing Proudhon does not occur both the unfitness and the overcoming happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the prioritizing rubefacient occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the temperateness occurs is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the temperateness and the prioritizing rubefacient happens.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the recording does not occur.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__