the pegmatite does not brief phrenology.
sent1: something does not brief attitude if it vesiculates. sent2: that the suspensory is not bicameral is not false. sent3: something does not brief attitude if the fact that it does not vesiculate and it is synchronous does not hold. sent4: if the fact that something is bicameral and does not brief attitude is not true then it briefs phrenology. sent5: if the suspensory is not bicameral then that the phylloquinone does not vesiculate but it is synchronous is not true. sent6: the pegmatite does not vesiculate. sent7: if the suspensory does skedaddle bur then the fact that the pegmatite is bicameral but it does not brief attitude is false. sent8: the fact that the phylloquinone vesiculates and it is not non-synchronous is not true if the suspensory is not bicameral. sent9: that the phylloquinone vesiculates and is synchronous is not right. sent10: if the phylloquinone does not brief attitude then the pegmatite does not brief phrenology. sent11: something does skedaddle bur if it does brief cutout. sent12: if the phylloquinone does vesiculate then it does not brief attitude. sent13: if that something does not chock ilama but it heeds is incorrect then it does not brief suspensory.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the phylloquinone does not vesiculate but it is synchronous is incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: the phylloquinone does not brief attitude if that it does not vesiculate and is synchronous is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the phylloquinone does not brief attitude.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the pegmatite does brief phrenology.
sent4 -> int4: the pegmatite briefs phrenology if the fact that it is bicameral and it does not brief attitude is not correct.; sent11 -> int5: the suspensory skedaddles bur if the fact that it briefs cutout is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the pegmatite does not brief phrenology. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not brief attitude if it vesiculates. sent2: that the suspensory is not bicameral is not false. sent3: something does not brief attitude if the fact that it does not vesiculate and it is synchronous does not hold. sent4: if the fact that something is bicameral and does not brief attitude is not true then it briefs phrenology. sent5: if the suspensory is not bicameral then that the phylloquinone does not vesiculate but it is synchronous is not true. sent6: the pegmatite does not vesiculate. sent7: if the suspensory does skedaddle bur then the fact that the pegmatite is bicameral but it does not brief attitude is false. sent8: the fact that the phylloquinone vesiculates and it is not non-synchronous is not true if the suspensory is not bicameral. sent9: that the phylloquinone vesiculates and is synchronous is not right. sent10: if the phylloquinone does not brief attitude then the pegmatite does not brief phrenology. sent11: something does skedaddle bur if it does brief cutout. sent12: if the phylloquinone does vesiculate then it does not brief attitude. sent13: if that something does not chock ilama but it heeds is incorrect then it does not brief suspensory. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the phylloquinone does not vesiculate but it is synchronous is incorrect.; sent3 -> int2: the phylloquinone does not brief attitude if that it does not vesiculate and is synchronous is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the phylloquinone does not brief attitude.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__