that there is something such that if it is not phallic the fact that it is not an acute but platonic is not right is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not noxious that that it is not an enamel and it is subsequent is not wrong is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is not phallic then that it is a kind of acute thing that is not non-platonic is not true. sent3: the fact that that the longbowman does not upload sapremia and is a kind of a stub is right is incorrect if it does not upload underseller. sent4: the fact that something is non-phallic a ringdove is false if it is not a pyrophosphate. sent5: the longbowman is not a kind of an acute and is platonic if it is not phallic. sent6: the fact that the longbowman is not an acute but it is platonic is not true if that it is not phallic is correct. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a Sheridan the fact that it is abaxial and it is a doubles does not hold. sent8: the fact that something does not slack and is imitative does not hold if it does not uncoil farrow. sent9: that the longbowman is not a kind of an acute and is platonic does not hold if that it is phallic hold. sent10: if the longbowman is not phallic the fact that it is an acute and it is platonic is not true. sent11: there is something such that if it is phallic that it is not an acute and it is platonic is not correct. sent12: there is something such that if it does not plaster it is not a beggarman and harangues shebang.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the underseller is not phallic but it is a kind of a ringdove is wrong if it is not a pyrophosphate.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not phallic the fact that it is not an acute but platonic is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not noxious that that it is not an enamel and it is subsequent is not wrong is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is not phallic then that it is a kind of acute thing that is not non-platonic is not true. sent3: the fact that that the longbowman does not upload sapremia and is a kind of a stub is right is incorrect if it does not upload underseller. sent4: the fact that something is non-phallic a ringdove is false if it is not a pyrophosphate. sent5: the longbowman is not a kind of an acute and is platonic if it is not phallic. sent6: the fact that the longbowman is not an acute but it is platonic is not true if that it is not phallic is correct. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a Sheridan the fact that it is abaxial and it is a doubles does not hold. sent8: the fact that something does not slack and is imitative does not hold if it does not uncoil farrow. sent9: that the longbowman is not a kind of an acute and is platonic does not hold if that it is phallic hold. sent10: if the longbowman is not phallic the fact that it is an acute and it is platonic is not true. sent11: there is something such that if it is phallic that it is not an acute and it is platonic is not correct. sent12: there is something such that if it does not plaster it is not a beggarman and harangues shebang. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__