that there is something such that that it is relevant or it does not unloose cocklebur or both is wrong is not right.
sent1: the necessitarian unlooses cocklebur. sent2: the trisaccharide is not a kind of a Kean. sent3: something unlooses cocklebur if it is non-omnidirectional. sent4: the quoits is a creditor. sent5: there is something such that it is a roly-poly. sent6: there is something such that it is not relevant. sent7: the bootmaker is a kind of a roly-poly and it invests protoarcheology. sent8: if the necessitarian is omnidirectional then the whippet invests Malamud. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it either is relevant or is a creditor or both is not correct. sent10: the whippet unlooses cocklebur. sent11: the necessitarian is not untheatrical. sent12: if the whippet is untheatrical and/or is a creditor the bootmaker does not invest protoarcheology. sent13: the fact that something is not irrelevant and/or it does not unloose cocklebur is not right if it is not omnidirectional. sent14: the bootmaker is a kind of a roly-poly. sent15: that something either is univalve or is not a shield or both is not right if it is not a admixture. sent16: the necessitarian does unloose cocklebur if it is not omnidirectional. sent17: there is something such that it is relevant and/or it does not unloose cocklebur. sent18: there is something such that that either it is relevant or it does unloose cocklebur or both does not hold. sent19: if the whippet does invest Malamud it is untheatrical. sent20: if the whippet is a creditor then the fact that the bootmaker does not invest protoarcheology is not false. sent21: the whippet is a kind of a syndication. sent22: there is something such that it either invests Malamud or does not unloose cocklebur or both. sent23: there exists something such that it does unloose cocklebur. sent24: the necessitarian is not a roly-poly.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the necessitarian is omnidirectional.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the whippet does invest Malamud.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the whippet is untheatrical.; int2 -> int3: the whippet is untheatrical and/or it is a creditor.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the bootmaker does not invest protoarcheology.; sent7 -> int5: the bootmaker invests protoarcheology.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the necessitarian is not omnidirectional.; sent13 -> int8: that the necessitarian is relevant and/or it does not unloose cocklebur is not correct if it is not omnidirectional.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that either the necessitarian is relevant or it does not unloose cocklebur or both does not hold.; int9 -> hypothesis;
if the archaeopteryx is not a admixture that either it is univalve or it does not shield or both is not right.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that that it is relevant or it does not unloose cocklebur or both is wrong is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the necessitarian unlooses cocklebur. sent2: the trisaccharide is not a kind of a Kean. sent3: something unlooses cocklebur if it is non-omnidirectional. sent4: the quoits is a creditor. sent5: there is something such that it is a roly-poly. sent6: there is something such that it is not relevant. sent7: the bootmaker is a kind of a roly-poly and it invests protoarcheology. sent8: if the necessitarian is omnidirectional then the whippet invests Malamud. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it either is relevant or is a creditor or both is not correct. sent10: the whippet unlooses cocklebur. sent11: the necessitarian is not untheatrical. sent12: if the whippet is untheatrical and/or is a creditor the bootmaker does not invest protoarcheology. sent13: the fact that something is not irrelevant and/or it does not unloose cocklebur is not right if it is not omnidirectional. sent14: the bootmaker is a kind of a roly-poly. sent15: that something either is univalve or is not a shield or both is not right if it is not a admixture. sent16: the necessitarian does unloose cocklebur if it is not omnidirectional. sent17: there is something such that it is relevant and/or it does not unloose cocklebur. sent18: there is something such that that either it is relevant or it does unloose cocklebur or both does not hold. sent19: if the whippet does invest Malamud it is untheatrical. sent20: if the whippet is a creditor then the fact that the bootmaker does not invest protoarcheology is not false. sent21: the whippet is a kind of a syndication. sent22: there is something such that it either invests Malamud or does not unloose cocklebur or both. sent23: there exists something such that it does unloose cocklebur. sent24: the necessitarian is not a roly-poly. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the necessitarian is omnidirectional.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the whippet does invest Malamud.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the whippet is untheatrical.; int2 -> int3: the whippet is untheatrical and/or it is a creditor.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the bootmaker does not invest protoarcheology.; sent7 -> int5: the bootmaker invests protoarcheology.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the necessitarian is not omnidirectional.; sent13 -> int8: that the necessitarian is relevant and/or it does not unloose cocklebur is not correct if it is not omnidirectional.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that either the necessitarian is relevant or it does not unloose cocklebur or both does not hold.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__