the fact that the Depokene is not mud-brick but it is autocatalytic is incorrect.
sent1: that something is not an affected but it is cismontane is not right if that it guesses Daguerre is not incorrect. sent2: if something is a kind of a archdeacon or does not gather review or both the review does not gather review. sent3: the fact that the congener does gather review and is outdoor is not correct if there exists something such that it does not gather review. sent4: if something is not a inoculant it does not guess Daguerre and it is nonabsorbent. sent5: the review is not consular. sent6: if the congener is cismontane then the Depokene is non-mud-brick and autocatalytic. sent7: there is something such that it is a archdeacon or it does not gather review or both. sent8: if the chevre is a Rorschach then the putamen is consular. sent9: the congener guesses cheerer if the chevre is a kind of a Myriophyllum. sent10: the Depokene does guess cheerer if the chevre does guess cheerer. sent11: if the review is not consular then the putamen is not consular. sent12: the chevre is mud-brick. sent13: the review is a Myriophyllum. sent14: the putamen is mud-brick. sent15: if the congener is consular then the putamen is cismontane. sent16: the fact that something is not mud-brick but it is not non-autocatalytic is incorrect if it is not a Rorschach. sent17: the chevre is a Myriophyllum if it is not a Rorschach. sent18: the congener is cismontane if it guesses cheerer. sent19: if something does guess cheerer then that the fact that it is not consular and it is not a Myriophyllum is right is not true. sent20: if that the Depokene does not guess cheerer but it is cismontane is not true then it is not a Myriophyllum. sent21: if the fact that something does gather review and it is outdoor is not true it is not a kind of a inoculant. sent22: the Depokene is not mud-brick. sent23: the putamen guesses Daguerre if the congener does not guesses Daguerre and is nonabsorbent. sent24: the putamen is a Myriophyllum. sent25: if that something is not consular and is not a kind of a Myriophyllum is wrong it is not a Rorschach.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chevre is a Rorschach.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the putamen is consular.; sent11 & sent5 -> int2: the putamen is non-consular.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the chevre is not a Rorschach.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the chevre is a kind of a Myriophyllum.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the congener does guess cheerer is true.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the congener is not non-cismontane.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the Depokene is non-mud-brick but it is autocatalytic does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Depokene is not mud-brick but it is autocatalytic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not an affected but it is cismontane is not right if that it guesses Daguerre is not incorrect. sent2: if something is a kind of a archdeacon or does not gather review or both the review does not gather review. sent3: the fact that the congener does gather review and is outdoor is not correct if there exists something such that it does not gather review. sent4: if something is not a inoculant it does not guess Daguerre and it is nonabsorbent. sent5: the review is not consular. sent6: if the congener is cismontane then the Depokene is non-mud-brick and autocatalytic. sent7: there is something such that it is a archdeacon or it does not gather review or both. sent8: if the chevre is a Rorschach then the putamen is consular. sent9: the congener guesses cheerer if the chevre is a kind of a Myriophyllum. sent10: the Depokene does guess cheerer if the chevre does guess cheerer. sent11: if the review is not consular then the putamen is not consular. sent12: the chevre is mud-brick. sent13: the review is a Myriophyllum. sent14: the putamen is mud-brick. sent15: if the congener is consular then the putamen is cismontane. sent16: the fact that something is not mud-brick but it is not non-autocatalytic is incorrect if it is not a Rorschach. sent17: the chevre is a Myriophyllum if it is not a Rorschach. sent18: the congener is cismontane if it guesses cheerer. sent19: if something does guess cheerer then that the fact that it is not consular and it is not a Myriophyllum is right is not true. sent20: if that the Depokene does not guess cheerer but it is cismontane is not true then it is not a Myriophyllum. sent21: if the fact that something does gather review and it is outdoor is not true it is not a kind of a inoculant. sent22: the Depokene is not mud-brick. sent23: the putamen guesses Daguerre if the congener does not guesses Daguerre and is nonabsorbent. sent24: the putamen is a Myriophyllum. sent25: if that something is not consular and is not a kind of a Myriophyllum is wrong it is not a Rorschach. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chevre is a Rorschach.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the putamen is consular.; sent11 & sent5 -> int2: the putamen is non-consular.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the chevre is not a Rorschach.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the chevre is a kind of a Myriophyllum.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the congener does guess cheerer is true.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the congener is not non-cismontane.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__