either the dallisgrass is a Rutilus or it is not non-archegonial or both.
sent1: the chichipe is not fragrant but a rough. sent2: something does embody but it is not lenten if it is not fragrant. sent3: if there exists something such that it is a rash and does resubmit Athanasianism that the Goth bones is not false. sent4: the fact that the Goth is both not a Helipterum and fragrant does not hold if the dallisgrass does not rough. sent5: if that the dallisgrass does resubmit Athanasianism and is not a kind of a rash is not right it does not rough. sent6: if something is a kind of a bone that it resubmits Athanasianism and is not a rash is not right. sent7: there is something such that it is a rash. sent8: if the chichipe is not fragrant then the fact that the motorcyclist is not fragrant hold. sent9: something is a rash and resubmits Athanasianism if it is not a Helipterum. sent10: the chichipe is not a Helipterum if it roughs. sent11: if that something is not a kind of a Helipterum is right it is a kind of a rash. sent12: that the Goth is not a kind of a rehash is correct if the fact that it is a kind of indecent thing that does not resubmit Platonism hold. sent13: if the Goth is a bone and not a rehash then the fact that the dallisgrass is archegonial is not incorrect. sent14: the chichipe is a rash. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is not a Helipterum and it is fragrant is not correct then the chichipe is not fragrant.
sent1 -> int1: the chichipe is a rough.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the chichipe is not a Helipterum hold.; sent9 -> int3: if the chichipe is not a Helipterum it is a rash that resubmits Athanasianism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chichipe is a kind of a rash and it does resubmit Athanasianism.; int4 -> int5: something is a rash and it does resubmit Athanasianism.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the Goth is a bone.;
the motorcyclist embodies but it is not lenten.
sent6 -> int7: the fact that the interstate resubmits Athanasianism and is not a kind of a rash is not correct if it is a bone.; sent2 -> int8: if the motorcyclist is not fragrant it does embody and it is not lenten.;
$hypothesis$ = either the dallisgrass is a Rutilus or it is not non-archegonial or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the chichipe is not fragrant but a rough. sent2: something does embody but it is not lenten if it is not fragrant. sent3: if there exists something such that it is a rash and does resubmit Athanasianism that the Goth bones is not false. sent4: the fact that the Goth is both not a Helipterum and fragrant does not hold if the dallisgrass does not rough. sent5: if that the dallisgrass does resubmit Athanasianism and is not a kind of a rash is not right it does not rough. sent6: if something is a kind of a bone that it resubmits Athanasianism and is not a rash is not right. sent7: there is something such that it is a rash. sent8: if the chichipe is not fragrant then the fact that the motorcyclist is not fragrant hold. sent9: something is a rash and resubmits Athanasianism if it is not a Helipterum. sent10: the chichipe is not a Helipterum if it roughs. sent11: if that something is not a kind of a Helipterum is right it is a kind of a rash. sent12: that the Goth is not a kind of a rehash is correct if the fact that it is a kind of indecent thing that does not resubmit Platonism hold. sent13: if the Goth is a bone and not a rehash then the fact that the dallisgrass is archegonial is not incorrect. sent14: the chichipe is a rash. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is not a Helipterum and it is fragrant is not correct then the chichipe is not fragrant. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the chichipe is a rough.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the chichipe is not a Helipterum hold.; sent9 -> int3: if the chichipe is not a Helipterum it is a rash that resubmits Athanasianism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chichipe is a kind of a rash and it does resubmit Athanasianism.; int4 -> int5: something is a rash and it does resubmit Athanasianism.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the Goth is a bone.; __UNKNOWN__