the oilstove is not a cavalryman.
sent1: there is something such that it is a sallow and not a pegboard. sent2: that the birdie does not effect taxidermist and does dissemble septum is not true. sent3: that the birdie does not effect taxidermist and dissembles septum is not true if the fact that it is not a visibility is not incorrect. sent4: if the oilstove does not effect taxidermist that it is not a cavalryman and it does not dissemble septum is false. sent5: that the SI is intramural is not incorrect. sent6: something that is not intramural is either not a pegboard or a visibility or both. sent7: a visibility is not non-intramural. sent8: that something does not effect taxidermist and does not dissemble septum does not hold if it is not a kind of a visibility. sent9: if the birdie does not dissemble septum then the fact that it is not a cavalryman and it is not a pegboard does not hold. sent10: the SI is a pegboard if there is something such that that it is not a sallow is true. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a sallow and it is a pegboard does not hold. sent12: the oilstove is a kind of a cavalryman if the SI is a pegboard but it is not a visibility. sent13: if something is not a kind of a visibility then the fact that it does not effect taxidermist and dissembles septum does not hold. sent14: the birdie is irreverent. sent15: the SI is not a kind of a pegboard if that the birdie dissembles septum hold. sent16: if there exists something such that that it sallows and it is not a pegboard does not hold then the SI is a pegboard. sent17: if that the birdie does not effect taxidermist and does not dissemble septum is false then the SI is not a pegboard. sent18: if the birdie is fitter and it is intramural then the oilstove is not a kind of a cavalryman. sent19: that the birdie is a kind of a fitter and it is irreverent is not incorrect. sent20: the SI is intramural if it is fitter.
sent8 -> int1: if the birdie is not a visibility then that it does not effect taxidermist and does not dissemble septum is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the birdie is not a kind of a visibility.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the birdie does not effect taxidermist and it does not dissemble septum is not right.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the SI is not a pegboard.; sent7 -> int4: the birdie is intramural if it is a visibility.; sent19 -> int5: the fact that the birdie is a kind of a fitter is right.;
that the oilstove is not a cavalryman does not hold.
sent6 -> int6: if the SI is not intramural then either it is not a pegboard or it is a kind of a visibility or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the oilstove is not a cavalryman. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is a sallow and not a pegboard. sent2: that the birdie does not effect taxidermist and does dissemble septum is not true. sent3: that the birdie does not effect taxidermist and dissembles septum is not true if the fact that it is not a visibility is not incorrect. sent4: if the oilstove does not effect taxidermist that it is not a cavalryman and it does not dissemble septum is false. sent5: that the SI is intramural is not incorrect. sent6: something that is not intramural is either not a pegboard or a visibility or both. sent7: a visibility is not non-intramural. sent8: that something does not effect taxidermist and does not dissemble septum does not hold if it is not a kind of a visibility. sent9: if the birdie does not dissemble septum then the fact that it is not a cavalryman and it is not a pegboard does not hold. sent10: the SI is a pegboard if there is something such that that it is not a sallow is true. sent11: there exists something such that that it is a sallow and it is a pegboard does not hold. sent12: the oilstove is a kind of a cavalryman if the SI is a pegboard but it is not a visibility. sent13: if something is not a kind of a visibility then the fact that it does not effect taxidermist and dissembles septum does not hold. sent14: the birdie is irreverent. sent15: the SI is not a kind of a pegboard if that the birdie dissembles septum hold. sent16: if there exists something such that that it sallows and it is not a pegboard does not hold then the SI is a pegboard. sent17: if that the birdie does not effect taxidermist and does not dissemble septum is false then the SI is not a pegboard. sent18: if the birdie is fitter and it is intramural then the oilstove is not a kind of a cavalryman. sent19: that the birdie is a kind of a fitter and it is irreverent is not incorrect. sent20: the SI is intramural if it is fitter. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the birdie is not a visibility then that it does not effect taxidermist and does not dissemble septum is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the birdie is not a kind of a visibility.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the birdie does not effect taxidermist and it does not dissemble septum is not right.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the SI is not a pegboard.; sent7 -> int4: the birdie is intramural if it is a visibility.; sent19 -> int5: the fact that the birdie is a kind of a fitter is right.; __UNKNOWN__