the iridicness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the putting sisterhood happens is right if the fact that the putting sisterhood does not occur and the infliction happens is not true. sent2: the fact that the persuasion does not occur and the dragging Godard does not occur does not hold if the infliction does not occur. sent3: the iridicness does not occur if the infliction or the iridicnessness or both happens. sent4: if the tweeting boy does not occur that the non-aneuploidness and the non-reticulateness occurs is false. sent5: the suburbanness occurs if that the dragging mythologist does not occur and the tweeting graphics does not occur is not true. sent6: if the saccade does not occur either the infliction or the non-iridicness or both happens. sent7: the saccade occurs. sent8: that the cutting does not occur is not correct. sent9: the ableness occurs. sent10: the saccade is prevented by that the Prakriticness does not occur and the dragging Godard happens. sent11: the admonishing occurs. sent12: that the punch-up but not the orderly happens is not correct if the oleophobicness does not occur. sent13: if that the persuasion does not occur and the dragging Godard does not occur does not hold the iridicness happens. sent14: the Prakriticness does not occur if both the saccade and the infliction happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the infliction happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the saccade and the infliction happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the Prakriticness does not occur.;
the putting sisterhood happens.
$hypothesis$ = the iridicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the putting sisterhood happens is right if the fact that the putting sisterhood does not occur and the infliction happens is not true. sent2: the fact that the persuasion does not occur and the dragging Godard does not occur does not hold if the infliction does not occur. sent3: the iridicness does not occur if the infliction or the iridicnessness or both happens. sent4: if the tweeting boy does not occur that the non-aneuploidness and the non-reticulateness occurs is false. sent5: the suburbanness occurs if that the dragging mythologist does not occur and the tweeting graphics does not occur is not true. sent6: if the saccade does not occur either the infliction or the non-iridicness or both happens. sent7: the saccade occurs. sent8: that the cutting does not occur is not correct. sent9: the ableness occurs. sent10: the saccade is prevented by that the Prakriticness does not occur and the dragging Godard happens. sent11: the admonishing occurs. sent12: that the punch-up but not the orderly happens is not correct if the oleophobicness does not occur. sent13: if that the persuasion does not occur and the dragging Godard does not occur does not hold the iridicness happens. sent14: the Prakriticness does not occur if both the saccade and the infliction happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the infliction happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the saccade and the infliction happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the Prakriticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__