that that something intrudes hiatus and/or is not a dispenser is not wrong is wrong.
sent1: the balmoral is not a striped and/or is not doctrinal. sent2: if the fact that the orthoclase stripes is not wrong the antifeminist does intrude neon. sent3: the orthoclase is both a striped and a dispenser if it is not competitive. sent4: there exists something such that it intrudes hiatus and/or it is a dispenser. sent5: the neon either does not intrude neon or stripes or both. sent6: that the orthoclase is a derelict but it does not intrude neon is incorrect. sent7: that the neon does not intrude neon or is not a striped or both is false. sent8: either the neon does not intrude neon or it does reinforce hatch or both if the orthoclase intrudes hiatus. sent9: the neon either intrudes neon or is not a striped or both. sent10: that the orthoclase does reinforce hatch and is a derelict does not hold. sent11: the orthoclase is not a kind of a derelict. sent12: the neon does not intrude neon or it is not a kind of a striped or both if the orthoclase reinforces hatch. sent13: if the orthoclase does reinforce hatch the neon does not intrude neon and/or it is a striped. sent14: the fact that the neon either intrudes neon or is not a kind of a striped or both hold if the orthoclase reinforces hatch. sent15: the orthoclase intrudes hiatus if that it does reinforce hatch and is not a kind of a derelict is not true. sent16: that the orthoclase is not competitive is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orthoclase reinforces hatch and is not a derelict.; assump1 -> int1: the orthoclase reinforces hatch.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the neon does not intrude neon or it does not stripe or both.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the orthoclase does reinforce hatch but it is not a derelict is wrong.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the orthoclase intrudes hiatus.; int5 -> int6: the orthoclase either intrudes hiatus or is not a dispenser or both.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the antifeminist intrudes park but it does not intrude hiatus.
sent3 & sent16 -> int7: the orthoclase does stripe and it is a dispenser.; int7 -> int8: that the orthoclase is a striped hold.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the antifeminist does intrude neon.;
$hypothesis$ = that that something intrudes hiatus and/or is not a dispenser is not wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the balmoral is not a striped and/or is not doctrinal. sent2: if the fact that the orthoclase stripes is not wrong the antifeminist does intrude neon. sent3: the orthoclase is both a striped and a dispenser if it is not competitive. sent4: there exists something such that it intrudes hiatus and/or it is a dispenser. sent5: the neon either does not intrude neon or stripes or both. sent6: that the orthoclase is a derelict but it does not intrude neon is incorrect. sent7: that the neon does not intrude neon or is not a striped or both is false. sent8: either the neon does not intrude neon or it does reinforce hatch or both if the orthoclase intrudes hiatus. sent9: the neon either intrudes neon or is not a striped or both. sent10: that the orthoclase does reinforce hatch and is a derelict does not hold. sent11: the orthoclase is not a kind of a derelict. sent12: the neon does not intrude neon or it is not a kind of a striped or both if the orthoclase reinforces hatch. sent13: if the orthoclase does reinforce hatch the neon does not intrude neon and/or it is a striped. sent14: the fact that the neon either intrudes neon or is not a kind of a striped or both hold if the orthoclase reinforces hatch. sent15: the orthoclase intrudes hiatus if that it does reinforce hatch and is not a kind of a derelict is not true. sent16: that the orthoclase is not competitive is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orthoclase reinforces hatch and is not a derelict.; assump1 -> int1: the orthoclase reinforces hatch.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the neon does not intrude neon or it does not stripe or both.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the orthoclase does reinforce hatch but it is not a derelict is wrong.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the orthoclase intrudes hiatus.; int5 -> int6: the orthoclase either intrudes hiatus or is not a dispenser or both.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__