the fact that the waltz prevents that the binary occurs is wrong.
sent1: the redemption does not occur but the neurotic occurs. sent2: if the waltzing does not occur the bituminoidness does not occur and the resurrection does not occur. sent3: if the jacking gluttony and the non-binaryness occurs then the waltz does not occur. sent4: if that the clout does not occur is true then that both the non-unpredictableness and the greening occurs does not hold. sent5: the demagogicness does not occur. sent6: if that the respectfulness does not occur is not false then that not the ensnaring but the clout occurs does not hold. sent7: the anoperinealness does not occur. sent8: that both the non-demagogicness and the whistle occurs is wrong if that the resurrection does not occur is not wrong. sent9: that the jacking nationality happens and the maternalness happens prevents the rerunning mace. sent10: the whistle occurs. sent11: the discussion does not occur but the rerunning schizoid occurs. sent12: the jacking medallion occurs. sent13: the panicking nationality occurs. sent14: the fact that the rerunning schizoid happens is right. sent15: that not the humbleness but the drollery happens is not right. sent16: if that that the waltzing does not occur and the resurrection does not occur hold is wrong then the leglessness occurs. sent17: both the jacking gluttony and the non-binariness occurs if the Niloticness happens. sent18: the Niloticness occurs if that the non-unpredictableness and the greens happens is not correct. sent19: the transubstantiating occurs. sent20: the hallelujah does not occur. sent21: the clouting does not occur if the fact that the ensnaring does not occur but the clouting happens does not hold. sent22: if the scuffing does not occur and the mist does not occur the fact that the respectfulness does not occur is not wrong. sent23: that both the resurrection and the waltz happens causes that the binary does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the resurrection does not occur.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: that both the non-demagogicness and the whistling happens is false.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: both the non-demagogicness and the whistling happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the resurrection occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waltzing happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the resurrection and the waltz occurs.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the fact that the binary does not occur is correct.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the leglessness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the waltz prevents that the binary occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the redemption does not occur but the neurotic occurs. sent2: if the waltzing does not occur the bituminoidness does not occur and the resurrection does not occur. sent3: if the jacking gluttony and the non-binaryness occurs then the waltz does not occur. sent4: if that the clout does not occur is true then that both the non-unpredictableness and the greening occurs does not hold. sent5: the demagogicness does not occur. sent6: if that the respectfulness does not occur is not false then that not the ensnaring but the clout occurs does not hold. sent7: the anoperinealness does not occur. sent8: that both the non-demagogicness and the whistle occurs is wrong if that the resurrection does not occur is not wrong. sent9: that the jacking nationality happens and the maternalness happens prevents the rerunning mace. sent10: the whistle occurs. sent11: the discussion does not occur but the rerunning schizoid occurs. sent12: the jacking medallion occurs. sent13: the panicking nationality occurs. sent14: the fact that the rerunning schizoid happens is right. sent15: that not the humbleness but the drollery happens is not right. sent16: if that that the waltzing does not occur and the resurrection does not occur hold is wrong then the leglessness occurs. sent17: both the jacking gluttony and the non-binariness occurs if the Niloticness happens. sent18: the Niloticness occurs if that the non-unpredictableness and the greens happens is not correct. sent19: the transubstantiating occurs. sent20: the hallelujah does not occur. sent21: the clouting does not occur if the fact that the ensnaring does not occur but the clouting happens does not hold. sent22: if the scuffing does not occur and the mist does not occur the fact that the respectfulness does not occur is not wrong. sent23: that both the resurrection and the waltz happens causes that the binary does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the resurrection does not occur.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: that both the non-demagogicness and the whistling happens is false.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: both the non-demagogicness and the whistling happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the resurrection occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waltzing happens.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the resurrection and the waltz occurs.; int5 & sent23 -> int6: the fact that the binary does not occur is correct.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__