the etymologist is a kind of non-artistic thing that is not a Steichen.
sent1: the stranger is not a kind of a torturer and is a Malthus if it is non-Lao. sent2: the tulle pitches cultivator if there is something such that the fact that it does not pitches cultivator and is not a Horus is not right. sent3: if something does pitch cultivator it is a kind of a colicroot. sent4: the winery does not pitch cultivator. sent5: the fact that something is a colicroot and is not a Horus is false if it is not rhythmical. sent6: the etymologist is both not artistic and not a Steichen if the stranger denies haberdashery. sent7: the etymologist is not rhythmical if it denies haberdashery and it denies Oklahoman. sent8: if something is a Kuroshio and it is malodorous then it does not deny Oklahoman. sent9: if there is something such that that it does subtilize anorexia and it is not a loungewear is false the stranger is not a Lao. sent10: if something is rhythmical it does deny haberdashery. sent11: something is artistic and it is a Steichen if it does not deny Oklahoman. sent12: if the stranger is not a torturer but a Malthus the winery is malodorous. sent13: the stranger is a Horus. sent14: that something is not rhythmical but it does deny haberdashery is false if that it is artistic is not wrong. sent15: the winery is a tasting. sent16: The cultivator does not pitch winery. sent17: the fact that something does not pitch cultivator and is not a kind of a Horus does not hold if it does not taste. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it subtilizes anorexia and is not a loungewear is not correct. sent19: the stranger is a tasting. sent20: the winery is a Kuroshio that is a solder. sent21: if the winery does not pitch cultivator and does taste then the stranger is not a kind of a colicroot. sent22: the fact that if the stranger is a kind of a Horus but it is not a kind of the colicroot then the stranger is rhythmical is true. sent23: the etymologist is not a Horus. sent24: the etymologist denies haberdashery. sent25: the fact that something is a kind of non-artistic thing that is not a kind of a Steichen does not hold if it does pitch cultivator.
sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the winery does not pitch cultivator but it is a tasting.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the stranger is not a colicroot.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the stranger is a Horus but it is not a colicroot.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the stranger is rhythmical.; sent10 -> int5: the stranger does deny haberdashery if it is rhythmical.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stranger does deny haberdashery.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the etymologist is not artistic and it is not a Steichen is not true.
sent25 -> int7: if the etymologist does pitch cultivator the fact that it is not artistic and it is not a Steichen is not correct.; sent5 -> int8: if the etymologist is not rhythmical the fact that it is a colicroot and it is not a Horus is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the etymologist is a kind of non-artistic thing that is not a Steichen. ; $context$ = sent1: the stranger is not a kind of a torturer and is a Malthus if it is non-Lao. sent2: the tulle pitches cultivator if there is something such that the fact that it does not pitches cultivator and is not a Horus is not right. sent3: if something does pitch cultivator it is a kind of a colicroot. sent4: the winery does not pitch cultivator. sent5: the fact that something is a colicroot and is not a Horus is false if it is not rhythmical. sent6: the etymologist is both not artistic and not a Steichen if the stranger denies haberdashery. sent7: the etymologist is not rhythmical if it denies haberdashery and it denies Oklahoman. sent8: if something is a Kuroshio and it is malodorous then it does not deny Oklahoman. sent9: if there is something such that that it does subtilize anorexia and it is not a loungewear is false the stranger is not a Lao. sent10: if something is rhythmical it does deny haberdashery. sent11: something is artistic and it is a Steichen if it does not deny Oklahoman. sent12: if the stranger is not a torturer but a Malthus the winery is malodorous. sent13: the stranger is a Horus. sent14: that something is not rhythmical but it does deny haberdashery is false if that it is artistic is not wrong. sent15: the winery is a tasting. sent16: The cultivator does not pitch winery. sent17: the fact that something does not pitch cultivator and is not a kind of a Horus does not hold if it does not taste. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it subtilizes anorexia and is not a loungewear is not correct. sent19: the stranger is a tasting. sent20: the winery is a Kuroshio that is a solder. sent21: if the winery does not pitch cultivator and does taste then the stranger is not a kind of a colicroot. sent22: the fact that if the stranger is a kind of a Horus but it is not a kind of the colicroot then the stranger is rhythmical is true. sent23: the etymologist is not a Horus. sent24: the etymologist denies haberdashery. sent25: the fact that something is a kind of non-artistic thing that is not a kind of a Steichen does not hold if it does pitch cultivator. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the winery does not pitch cultivator but it is a tasting.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the stranger is not a colicroot.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the stranger is a Horus but it is not a colicroot.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the stranger is rhythmical.; sent10 -> int5: the stranger does deny haberdashery if it is rhythmical.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stranger does deny haberdashery.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__