the Colombian is starless.
sent1: the minstrel is a kind of a numerologist but it is not a Tao if the cutout does repine thickness. sent2: the cutout repines thickness if there is something such that it is a pawer. sent3: the cabana is starless if the Colombian repines cartilaginification. sent4: the cabana is not a astrometry and it does not repine cartilaginification if the mathematician does repine cartilaginification. sent5: the mathematician repines cartilaginification if the minstrel is a kind of a Wister. sent6: if the cabana is not a astrometry and does not repine cartilaginification then the Colombian is starless. sent7: something is not starless if it is a Wister and it is a numerologist. sent8: if the fact that something repines trope and is Atlantic is not true it is not a numerologist. sent9: if something is not a kind of a Wister then the fact that it does repine trope and it is a Atlantic is false. sent10: there is something such that it is a pawer.
sent9 -> int1: if the minstrel is not a kind of a Wister the fact that it does repine trope and it is a Atlantic is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the minstrel is not a Wister.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the minstrel repines trope and is a Atlantic is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the minstrel is not a kind of a numerologist if that it repines trope and it is Atlantic is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the minstrel is not a numerologist.; sent10 & sent2 -> int5: the cutout repines thickness.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the minstrel is a numerologist but it is not a kind of a Tao.; int6 -> int7: the minstrel is a numerologist.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the minstrel is a kind of a Wister.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the mathematician repines cartilaginification.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the cabana is not a astrometry and it does not repine cartilaginification.; int11 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the Colombian is not starless.
sent7 -> int12: if the Colombian is a Wister and it is a kind of a numerologist then it is not starless.;
$hypothesis$ = the Colombian is starless. ; $context$ = sent1: the minstrel is a kind of a numerologist but it is not a Tao if the cutout does repine thickness. sent2: the cutout repines thickness if there is something such that it is a pawer. sent3: the cabana is starless if the Colombian repines cartilaginification. sent4: the cabana is not a astrometry and it does not repine cartilaginification if the mathematician does repine cartilaginification. sent5: the mathematician repines cartilaginification if the minstrel is a kind of a Wister. sent6: if the cabana is not a astrometry and does not repine cartilaginification then the Colombian is starless. sent7: something is not starless if it is a Wister and it is a numerologist. sent8: if the fact that something repines trope and is Atlantic is not true it is not a numerologist. sent9: if something is not a kind of a Wister then the fact that it does repine trope and it is a Atlantic is false. sent10: there is something such that it is a pawer. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the minstrel is not a kind of a Wister the fact that it does repine trope and it is a Atlantic is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the minstrel is not a Wister.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the minstrel repines trope and is a Atlantic is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the minstrel is not a kind of a numerologist if that it repines trope and it is Atlantic is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the minstrel is not a numerologist.; sent10 & sent2 -> int5: the cutout repines thickness.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the minstrel is a numerologist but it is not a kind of a Tao.; int6 -> int7: the minstrel is a numerologist.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the minstrel is a kind of a Wister.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the mathematician repines cartilaginification.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the cabana is not a astrometry and it does not repine cartilaginification.; int11 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__