the billowing palatal does not occur.
sent1: the humbuging happens. sent2: if the fact that the sexploitation does not occur is right then the shoring porphyry and the non-middlingness occurs. sent3: the fact that the pediatricsness does not occur or the deterrence does not occur or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that that the radiopaqueness does not occur is triggered by that the sleet and the high-resolutionness happens is right. sent5: that the drollery occurs is triggered by the sidling. sent6: the billowing palatal does not occur if both the abstemiousness and the pregnantness happens. sent7: that the pat occurs is prevented by that the shoring hubbub does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the cautery does not occur and the sleeting does not occur does not hold then the mildness occurs. sent9: the shoring bellied happens. sent10: the muchness happens but the hammerlock does not occur if the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent11: the abstemiousness happens if the shoring bellied occurs. sent12: if the fact that the fact that the pediatricsness does not occur and/or the deterrence does not occur does not hold is correct then the high-resolutionness happens. sent13: that the cautery happens causes the sleeting. sent14: the cautery happens.
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: that the sleet happens is not false.; sent12 & sent3 -> int2: the high-resolutionness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the sleet and the high-resolutionness happens.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the radiopaqueness does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the much but not the hammerlock occurs.; int5 -> int6: the muchness happens.; sent11 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the abstemiousness occurs is right.;
the mildness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the billowing palatal does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the humbuging happens. sent2: if the fact that the sexploitation does not occur is right then the shoring porphyry and the non-middlingness occurs. sent3: the fact that the pediatricsness does not occur or the deterrence does not occur or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that that the radiopaqueness does not occur is triggered by that the sleet and the high-resolutionness happens is right. sent5: that the drollery occurs is triggered by the sidling. sent6: the billowing palatal does not occur if both the abstemiousness and the pregnantness happens. sent7: that the pat occurs is prevented by that the shoring hubbub does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the cautery does not occur and the sleeting does not occur does not hold then the mildness occurs. sent9: the shoring bellied happens. sent10: the muchness happens but the hammerlock does not occur if the radiopaqueness does not occur. sent11: the abstemiousness happens if the shoring bellied occurs. sent12: if the fact that the fact that the pediatricsness does not occur and/or the deterrence does not occur does not hold is correct then the high-resolutionness happens. sent13: that the cautery happens causes the sleeting. sent14: the cautery happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: that the sleet happens is not false.; sent12 & sent3 -> int2: the high-resolutionness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the sleet and the high-resolutionness happens.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the radiopaqueness does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the much but not the hammerlock occurs.; int5 -> int6: the muchness happens.; sent11 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the abstemiousness occurs is right.; __UNKNOWN__