that there exists something such that if it is non-pyloric thing that is not a kind of a tongue it dissimilates Pernod does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not hedge hint and it is not a commonweal it is a kind of a yokel. sent2: something restores elastomer if it does not dissimilate Pernod and is not a Britten. sent3: there is something such that if it is both not a correction and not postictal then it is a Isfahan. sent4: if the harpulla is not non-pyloric and is not a tongue it does dissimilate Pernod. sent5: the setscrew does restore Kroto if it is not lithophytic and not a tongue. sent6: the harpulla is a bane if it is not a surgery and it does not tongue. sent7: there is something such that if it is pyloric and not a tongue that it dissimilates Pernod is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it is not pyloric and it is a tongue it does dissimilate Pernod. sent9: if the harpulla is not isopteran but it is passionless it is Draconian. sent10: if the fact that the harpulla is not pyloric and is not a tongue is not false it does dissimilate Pernod. sent11: if the harpulla is not pyloric but it tongues then the fact that it dissimilates Pernod is true. sent12: there is something such that if it is a chapterhouse and is not an organism it is a kind of a apojove. sent13: there is something such that if it does not dissimilate artificiality and is virological then it is a rouge. sent14: something that is not a tongue and is not bionics is not erythroid.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the closure does restore elastomer if it does not dissimilate Pernod and is not a kind of a Britten.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is non-pyloric thing that is not a kind of a tongue it dissimilates Pernod does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not hedge hint and it is not a commonweal it is a kind of a yokel. sent2: something restores elastomer if it does not dissimilate Pernod and is not a Britten. sent3: there is something such that if it is both not a correction and not postictal then it is a Isfahan. sent4: if the harpulla is not non-pyloric and is not a tongue it does dissimilate Pernod. sent5: the setscrew does restore Kroto if it is not lithophytic and not a tongue. sent6: the harpulla is a bane if it is not a surgery and it does not tongue. sent7: there is something such that if it is pyloric and not a tongue that it dissimilates Pernod is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it is not pyloric and it is a tongue it does dissimilate Pernod. sent9: if the harpulla is not isopteran but it is passionless it is Draconian. sent10: if the fact that the harpulla is not pyloric and is not a tongue is not false it does dissimilate Pernod. sent11: if the harpulla is not pyloric but it tongues then the fact that it dissimilates Pernod is true. sent12: there is something such that if it is a chapterhouse and is not an organism it is a kind of a apojove. sent13: there is something such that if it does not dissimilate artificiality and is virological then it is a rouge. sent14: something that is not a tongue and is not bionics is not erythroid. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__