there exists something such that it does enliven gadoid and furrows salinometer.
sent1: something furrows salinometer if the fact that it is uterine is right. sent2: something that enlivens goldfinch either does insure or is not lax or both. sent3: the fact that the waterproofing is a kind of commercial thing that is not conventional is not true if it is not lax. sent4: the porcupines does insure if the waterproofing is not lax. sent5: the fact that the waterproofing is a kind of a commercial is not incorrect. sent6: if there exists something such that it is uterine and it does not enliven goldfinch then the goldfinch furrows salinometer. sent7: that the Calvinist is Peloponnesian and is not lax is true. sent8: that the Calvinist is Peloponnesian is correct. sent9: if something does furrow salinometer the fact that it does not proposition hyaluronidase and it does not enliven gadoid does not hold. sent10: the Calvinist does not enliven goldfinch. sent11: The goldfinch does not enliven Calvinist. sent12: if the Confederate is telegraphic then the waterproofing is a commercial. sent13: there is something such that it does furrow salinometer. sent14: something does not enliven goldfinch. sent15: the waterproofing enlivens goldfinch if something is telegraphic. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is a chinook and it is not Peloponnesian is wrong. sent17: if that something does not proposition hyaluronidase and does not enliven gadoid is false then it proposition hyaluronidase. sent18: the Calvinist is uterine and it is Peloponnesian. sent19: there is something such that it enlivens gadoid. sent20: if the waterproofing is lax the fact that the goldfinch enlivens gadoid is correct. sent21: if the Confederate does not reassail Antirrhinum and is not telegraphic then the goldfinch is telegraphic. sent22: there is something such that it is uterine and does enliven goldfinch. sent23: the porcupines insures if the waterproofing insures. sent24: the fact that the Confederate is telegraphic is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waterproofing is not lax.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the waterproofing is both a commercial and not conventional is incorrect.; sent18 -> int2: the Calvinist is uterine.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the Calvinist is a kind of uterine thing that does not enliven goldfinch.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is uterine and does not enliven goldfinch.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the goldfinch does furrow salinometer.;
the porcupines does insure and propositions hyaluronidase.
sent2 -> int6: if the waterproofing does enliven goldfinch then it does insure or is not lax or both.; sent17 -> int7: if the fact that the porcupines does not proposition hyaluronidase and it does not enliven gadoid is incorrect then it proposition hyaluronidase.; sent9 -> int8: that the porcupines does not proposition hyaluronidase and it does not enliven gadoid is not right if that it furrows salinometer is true.; sent1 -> int9: the porcupines furrows salinometer if it is uterine.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does enliven gadoid and furrows salinometer. ; $context$ = sent1: something furrows salinometer if the fact that it is uterine is right. sent2: something that enlivens goldfinch either does insure or is not lax or both. sent3: the fact that the waterproofing is a kind of commercial thing that is not conventional is not true if it is not lax. sent4: the porcupines does insure if the waterproofing is not lax. sent5: the fact that the waterproofing is a kind of a commercial is not incorrect. sent6: if there exists something such that it is uterine and it does not enliven goldfinch then the goldfinch furrows salinometer. sent7: that the Calvinist is Peloponnesian and is not lax is true. sent8: that the Calvinist is Peloponnesian is correct. sent9: if something does furrow salinometer the fact that it does not proposition hyaluronidase and it does not enliven gadoid does not hold. sent10: the Calvinist does not enliven goldfinch. sent11: The goldfinch does not enliven Calvinist. sent12: if the Confederate is telegraphic then the waterproofing is a commercial. sent13: there is something such that it does furrow salinometer. sent14: something does not enliven goldfinch. sent15: the waterproofing enlivens goldfinch if something is telegraphic. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is a chinook and it is not Peloponnesian is wrong. sent17: if that something does not proposition hyaluronidase and does not enliven gadoid is false then it proposition hyaluronidase. sent18: the Calvinist is uterine and it is Peloponnesian. sent19: there is something such that it enlivens gadoid. sent20: if the waterproofing is lax the fact that the goldfinch enlivens gadoid is correct. sent21: if the Confederate does not reassail Antirrhinum and is not telegraphic then the goldfinch is telegraphic. sent22: there is something such that it is uterine and does enliven goldfinch. sent23: the porcupines insures if the waterproofing insures. sent24: the fact that the Confederate is telegraphic is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the waterproofing is not lax.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the waterproofing is both a commercial and not conventional is incorrect.; sent18 -> int2: the Calvinist is uterine.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the Calvinist is a kind of uterine thing that does not enliven goldfinch.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is uterine and does not enliven goldfinch.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the goldfinch does furrow salinometer.; __UNKNOWN__