the nitrate does not blaspheme Leptotyphlopidae.
sent1: that the alienator is hexangular and is semiautobiographical is incorrect if the Cynic is not a Ethiopian. sent2: if that the alienator is not lexical is not incorrect then the whinstone blasphemes oophorosalpingectomy and it lags chronology. sent3: the whinstone does lag chronology. sent4: the ER is a micrometeorite if the pesticide surprises dosemeter. sent5: the fact that the whinstone is hexangular and it is semiautobiographical is not right if it is not lexical. sent6: if something is not lexical and/or it does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy then it does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy. sent7: something is a splat but it is not scrotal if the fact that it is a kind of an individual is true. sent8: if the octoroon is a micrometeorite then the fact that the fact that it is not a reform and is a Trinitarian is not wrong is not correct. sent9: the whinstone does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy if it does not follow octoroon. sent10: something is an individual if the fact that it does not reform and is a Trinitarian is not right. sent11: the solan does not resolve. sent12: The chronology does lag whinstone. sent13: if the ER is a kind of a micrometeorite the octoroon is a kind of a micrometeorite. sent14: the pesticide surprises dosemeter and is functional. sent15: if that something is hexangular and is semiautobiographical is not right then it is not lexical. sent16: if something does not lag alienator the fact that it does resolve and/or is not irremovable is not right. sent17: if something does not follow octoroon then it does lag alienator and does blaspheme Leptotyphlopidae. sent18: if the fact that the solan is both scrotal and Ethiopian is not true then it does not lag alienator. sent19: that the solan blasphemes Leptotyphlopidae and is scrotal is not right. sent20: if the fact that the whinstone does lag chronology and does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy hold it is not lexical. sent21: the whinstone does not follow octoroon if there exists something such that the fact that it resolves and/or is not irremovable does not hold. sent22: if the whinstone does blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy then the nitrate follows octoroon. sent23: if the alienator does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy the whinstone does not lag chronology and does not follow octoroon. sent24: if the whinstone does not lag chronology and does not follow octoroon the nitrate does not follow octoroon. sent25: if the fact that the whinstone is hexangular and is semiautobiographical is wrong then the fact that the nitrate does not blaspheme Leptotyphlopidae hold. sent26: if the whinstone is not hexangular then the nitrate does not blaspheme Leptotyphlopidae.
sent16 -> int1: if the solan does not lag alienator that either it does resolve or it is not irremovable or both is not correct.;
the nitrate blasphemes Leptotyphlopidae.
$hypothesis$ = the nitrate does not blaspheme Leptotyphlopidae. ; $context$ = sent1: that the alienator is hexangular and is semiautobiographical is incorrect if the Cynic is not a Ethiopian. sent2: if that the alienator is not lexical is not incorrect then the whinstone blasphemes oophorosalpingectomy and it lags chronology. sent3: the whinstone does lag chronology. sent4: the ER is a micrometeorite if the pesticide surprises dosemeter. sent5: the fact that the whinstone is hexangular and it is semiautobiographical is not right if it is not lexical. sent6: if something is not lexical and/or it does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy then it does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy. sent7: something is a splat but it is not scrotal if the fact that it is a kind of an individual is true. sent8: if the octoroon is a micrometeorite then the fact that the fact that it is not a reform and is a Trinitarian is not wrong is not correct. sent9: the whinstone does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy if it does not follow octoroon. sent10: something is an individual if the fact that it does not reform and is a Trinitarian is not right. sent11: the solan does not resolve. sent12: The chronology does lag whinstone. sent13: if the ER is a kind of a micrometeorite the octoroon is a kind of a micrometeorite. sent14: the pesticide surprises dosemeter and is functional. sent15: if that something is hexangular and is semiautobiographical is not right then it is not lexical. sent16: if something does not lag alienator the fact that it does resolve and/or is not irremovable is not right. sent17: if something does not follow octoroon then it does lag alienator and does blaspheme Leptotyphlopidae. sent18: if the fact that the solan is both scrotal and Ethiopian is not true then it does not lag alienator. sent19: that the solan blasphemes Leptotyphlopidae and is scrotal is not right. sent20: if the fact that the whinstone does lag chronology and does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy hold it is not lexical. sent21: the whinstone does not follow octoroon if there exists something such that the fact that it resolves and/or is not irremovable does not hold. sent22: if the whinstone does blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy then the nitrate follows octoroon. sent23: if the alienator does not blaspheme oophorosalpingectomy the whinstone does not lag chronology and does not follow octoroon. sent24: if the whinstone does not lag chronology and does not follow octoroon the nitrate does not follow octoroon. sent25: if the fact that the whinstone is hexangular and is semiautobiographical is wrong then the fact that the nitrate does not blaspheme Leptotyphlopidae hold. sent26: if the whinstone is not hexangular then the nitrate does not blaspheme Leptotyphlopidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the solan does not lag alienator that either it does resolve or it is not irremovable or both is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__