there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Pauling it does not compose.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is costal is not wrong it is not soteriological. sent2: the clinometer is either an individuality or a pastness or both. sent3: if the fact that something is a kind of a Pauling is not false then the fact that it is Gauguinesque and/or it does not hypothecate excerpt is not correct. sent4: something decimates if the fact that either it is nonexplosive or it is not a progymnosperm or both does not hold. sent5: the transgression is not Gauguinesque. sent6: if something is a Pauling that it is a pinwheel and/or it is not a moral is not true. sent7: the straggler is Botswanan if the feeding is Botswanan. sent8: the transgression composes. sent9: something is not Gauguinesque if it is a Pauling. sent10: that something does compose and is not a Pauling is not right if that it is not a potshot is correct. sent11: if the fact that the 4WD is not a kind of a proposer is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Pauling. sent12: the fact that either the transgression is a kind of a hypokalemia or it is not regressive or both is incorrect if it is a Pauling. sent13: if the LOX is a potshot but it is not a poltroon the silkworm is not a kind of a potshot. sent14: the fact that the willet is a pinwheel and/or it is not interoceptive is wrong. sent15: that either the transgression scrambles clog or it is not a proposer or both is not right if it is a Pauling. sent16: the LOX is a kind of a potshot but it is not a kind of a poltroon if the straggler is Botswanan.
sent3 -> int1: if the transgression is a Pauling then the fact that it is Gauguinesque and/or it does not hypothecate excerpt is not right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transgression is a kind of a Pauling.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the transgression is Gauguinesque or it does not hypothecate excerpt or both is incorrect.;
the fact that either the casing is a kind of a pinwheel or it is not a kind of a moral or both does not hold.
sent6 -> int3: that the casing is a pinwheel and/or it is not moral is not right if the fact that it is a Pauling is true.; sent10 -> int4: the fact that the silkworm does compose but it is not a Pauling does not hold if it is not a potshot.; sent2 -> int5: something is an individuality and/or it is a pastness.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Pauling it does not compose. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is costal is not wrong it is not soteriological. sent2: the clinometer is either an individuality or a pastness or both. sent3: if the fact that something is a kind of a Pauling is not false then the fact that it is Gauguinesque and/or it does not hypothecate excerpt is not correct. sent4: something decimates if the fact that either it is nonexplosive or it is not a progymnosperm or both does not hold. sent5: the transgression is not Gauguinesque. sent6: if something is a Pauling that it is a pinwheel and/or it is not a moral is not true. sent7: the straggler is Botswanan if the feeding is Botswanan. sent8: the transgression composes. sent9: something is not Gauguinesque if it is a Pauling. sent10: that something does compose and is not a Pauling is not right if that it is not a potshot is correct. sent11: if the fact that the 4WD is not a kind of a proposer is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Pauling. sent12: the fact that either the transgression is a kind of a hypokalemia or it is not regressive or both is incorrect if it is a Pauling. sent13: if the LOX is a potshot but it is not a poltroon the silkworm is not a kind of a potshot. sent14: the fact that the willet is a pinwheel and/or it is not interoceptive is wrong. sent15: that either the transgression scrambles clog or it is not a proposer or both is not right if it is a Pauling. sent16: the LOX is a kind of a potshot but it is not a kind of a poltroon if the straggler is Botswanan. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the transgression is a Pauling then the fact that it is Gauguinesque and/or it does not hypothecate excerpt is not right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transgression is a kind of a Pauling.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the transgression is Gauguinesque or it does not hypothecate excerpt or both is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__