the bandwagon is not natriuretic.
sent1: if a non-chaotic thing does dissimilate Nyala then the Nyala is invariable. sent2: if the fact that something is not mortal is true it is not frontal. sent3: if the Nyala is invariable and it is a kind of a Williamstown then the bandwagon is not stannic. sent4: the bandwagon is not natriuretic if it does not dissimilate Nyala. sent5: the gamecock is Honduran. sent6: the bandwagon dissimilates Nyala. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a land and not natriuretic is incorrect the bandwagon does land. sent8: that that the bunker is not a Williamstown and it is not a Shiraz is incorrect is not wrong. sent9: the stander doodles. sent10: the Nyala is a Williamstown if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Williamstown and is not a kind of a Shiraz is not true. sent11: the Nyala is natriuretic. sent12: something is not natriuretic if it is not stannic. sent13: the gamecock is a kind of non-chaotic thing that does dissimilate Nyala. sent14: there is something such that that it is a glossalgia and it is not a scheme is not true.
sent13 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not chaotic and it does dissimilate Nyala is true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Nyala is invariable.; sent8 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Williamstown and is not a Shiraz is false.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the Nyala is a Williamstown.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the Nyala is invariable and is a Williamstown.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the bandwagon is not stannic.; sent12 -> int7: the fact that the bandwagon is natriuretic is not correct if it is non-stannic.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bandwagon is not natriuretic. ; $context$ = sent1: if a non-chaotic thing does dissimilate Nyala then the Nyala is invariable. sent2: if the fact that something is not mortal is true it is not frontal. sent3: if the Nyala is invariable and it is a kind of a Williamstown then the bandwagon is not stannic. sent4: the bandwagon is not natriuretic if it does not dissimilate Nyala. sent5: the gamecock is Honduran. sent6: the bandwagon dissimilates Nyala. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a land and not natriuretic is incorrect the bandwagon does land. sent8: that that the bunker is not a Williamstown and it is not a Shiraz is incorrect is not wrong. sent9: the stander doodles. sent10: the Nyala is a Williamstown if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Williamstown and is not a kind of a Shiraz is not true. sent11: the Nyala is natriuretic. sent12: something is not natriuretic if it is not stannic. sent13: the gamecock is a kind of non-chaotic thing that does dissimilate Nyala. sent14: there is something such that that it is a glossalgia and it is not a scheme is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not chaotic and it does dissimilate Nyala is true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Nyala is invariable.; sent8 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Williamstown and is not a Shiraz is false.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the Nyala is a Williamstown.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the Nyala is invariable and is a Williamstown.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the bandwagon is not stannic.; sent12 -> int7: the fact that the bandwagon is natriuretic is not correct if it is non-stannic.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__