the town does not lecture tushery.
sent1: if the worshiper pigs and it is a compromise it is not a liman. sent2: something is a corruptibility if it is not a precursor. sent3: the fact that that the palm is both associational and not a Sylvilagus is right does not hold. sent4: everything is narial and it is a stateswoman. sent5: if something that is a kind of a corruptibility palatalizes aspiration it does not lecture tushery. sent6: the town is not a kind of a Sylvilagus if there exists something such that it is a theophany. sent7: if the town is not a Sylvilagus then it is a kind of a precursor. sent8: the aspiration is colloidal but it is not a precursor if the nudist lectures tushery. sent9: the palm is not arbitrary. sent10: something is a kind of insubstantial thing that does not teethe. sent11: the palm is associational and it lectures tushery. sent12: if there exists something such that the fact that it is associational thing that is not a Sylvilagus is not right the town is not a precursor.
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is associational thing that is not a kind of a Sylvilagus is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the town is not a kind of a precursor hold.; sent2 -> int3: if the town is not a precursor then the fact that it is a corruptibility is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the town is a corruptibility.; sent5 -> int5: the town does not lecture tushery if it is a kind of a corruptibility that does palatalize aspiration.;
the aspiration is a kind of colloidal thing that is a temper.
$hypothesis$ = the town does not lecture tushery. ; $context$ = sent1: if the worshiper pigs and it is a compromise it is not a liman. sent2: something is a corruptibility if it is not a precursor. sent3: the fact that that the palm is both associational and not a Sylvilagus is right does not hold. sent4: everything is narial and it is a stateswoman. sent5: if something that is a kind of a corruptibility palatalizes aspiration it does not lecture tushery. sent6: the town is not a kind of a Sylvilagus if there exists something such that it is a theophany. sent7: if the town is not a Sylvilagus then it is a kind of a precursor. sent8: the aspiration is colloidal but it is not a precursor if the nudist lectures tushery. sent9: the palm is not arbitrary. sent10: something is a kind of insubstantial thing that does not teethe. sent11: the palm is associational and it lectures tushery. sent12: if there exists something such that the fact that it is associational thing that is not a Sylvilagus is not right the town is not a precursor. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is associational thing that is not a kind of a Sylvilagus is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the town is not a kind of a precursor hold.; sent2 -> int3: if the town is not a precursor then the fact that it is a corruptibility is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the town is a corruptibility.; sent5 -> int5: the town does not lecture tushery if it is a kind of a corruptibility that does palatalize aspiration.; __UNKNOWN__