the caruncle does not philander Victrola.
sent1: if the Guru is not a kind of a pedantry then the caruncle does not flock SLS. sent2: if the Guru does not glimpse either the hotbox does not philander commonalty or it does not cathect wintergreen or both. sent3: the Sexton flocks SLS if the hotbox does not cathect wintergreen. sent4: the fact that something philanders Victrola and it is a glimpse is not incorrect if it does not flock SLS. sent5: the fact that the Victrola is a pedantry and is allometric is false. sent6: if the Guru is a kind of a glimpse then the poikilotherm is a kind of a knitwear. sent7: the caruncle does not glimpse if there exists something such that it is a kind of a knitwear. sent8: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a pedantry and is not allometric is not correct the cetrimide is not a pedantry. sent9: that the Victrola is a pedantry and not allometric does not hold. sent10: if the hotbox does not philander commonalty the Sexton does flock SLS. sent11: that that the Guru is both a glimpse and not a pedantry is not right hold. sent12: there is something such that that it is a pedantry and it is not non-allometric is not right. sent13: something is a kind of a glimpse and cathects wintergreen if that it does not flock SLS is true. sent14: that the caruncle is a knitwear and it is a pedantry is false. sent15: the cetrimide is not a kind of a pedantry if there exists something such that it is allometric. sent16: the caruncle does not cathect wintergreen and it does not philander Victrola if the hotbox does philander Victrola. sent17: the fact that the caruncle is not a knitwear is not false. sent18: if the poikilotherm is a knitwear then the caruncle is not a knitwear. sent19: something is not a kind of a knitwear and is not a pedantry if it is allometric. sent20: there exists something such that it is a pedantry and is not allometric. sent21: if the Sexton flocks SLS the fact that the cetrimide is a pedantry is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Guru is not a glimpse.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the hotbox does not philander commonalty and/or it does not cathect wintergreen.; int1 & sent10 & sent3 -> int2: the Sexton flocks SLS.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the cetrimide is a pedantry.; sent9 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a pedantry that is not allometric is not right.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the cetrimide is not a pedantry.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Guru glimpses.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the poikilotherm is a knitwear.;
the caruncle does philander Victrola.
sent4 -> int9: the caruncle philanders Victrola and is a kind of a glimpse if it does not flock SLS.; sent19 -> int10: if the Guru is allometric then it is both not a knitwear and not a pedantry.;
$hypothesis$ = the caruncle does not philander Victrola. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Guru is not a kind of a pedantry then the caruncle does not flock SLS. sent2: if the Guru does not glimpse either the hotbox does not philander commonalty or it does not cathect wintergreen or both. sent3: the Sexton flocks SLS if the hotbox does not cathect wintergreen. sent4: the fact that something philanders Victrola and it is a glimpse is not incorrect if it does not flock SLS. sent5: the fact that the Victrola is a pedantry and is allometric is false. sent6: if the Guru is a kind of a glimpse then the poikilotherm is a kind of a knitwear. sent7: the caruncle does not glimpse if there exists something such that it is a kind of a knitwear. sent8: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a pedantry and is not allometric is not correct the cetrimide is not a pedantry. sent9: that the Victrola is a pedantry and not allometric does not hold. sent10: if the hotbox does not philander commonalty the Sexton does flock SLS. sent11: that that the Guru is both a glimpse and not a pedantry is not right hold. sent12: there is something such that that it is a pedantry and it is not non-allometric is not right. sent13: something is a kind of a glimpse and cathects wintergreen if that it does not flock SLS is true. sent14: that the caruncle is a knitwear and it is a pedantry is false. sent15: the cetrimide is not a kind of a pedantry if there exists something such that it is allometric. sent16: the caruncle does not cathect wintergreen and it does not philander Victrola if the hotbox does philander Victrola. sent17: the fact that the caruncle is not a knitwear is not false. sent18: if the poikilotherm is a knitwear then the caruncle is not a knitwear. sent19: something is not a kind of a knitwear and is not a pedantry if it is allometric. sent20: there exists something such that it is a pedantry and is not allometric. sent21: if the Sexton flocks SLS the fact that the cetrimide is a pedantry is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Guru is not a glimpse.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the hotbox does not philander commonalty and/or it does not cathect wintergreen.; int1 & sent10 & sent3 -> int2: the Sexton flocks SLS.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the cetrimide is a pedantry.; sent9 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a pedantry that is not allometric is not right.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the cetrimide is not a pedantry.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Guru glimpses.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the poikilotherm is a knitwear.; __UNKNOWN__