the househusband is not a kind of a Cleveland but it does intrigue Tiepolo.
sent1: the fact that the Jacobin does not intrigue Tiepolo and is a clearness is not correct. sent2: everything is a kind of a clearness that does not fornicate. sent3: the fact that the househusband does fornicate and is not a Cleveland does not hold if it is a clearness. sent4: that the househusband does scale faith but it does not intrigue Tiepolo is not right. sent5: everything does not fornicate. sent6: if something scales faith then that it is a clearness and does not fornicate is not right. sent7: something is not a Cleveland but it does intrigue Tiepolo if it scales faith. sent8: that the Jacobin is a kind of a clearness that fornicates is incorrect if it does scale faith. sent9: if the Jacobin does not scale faith then that the househusband is not a Cleveland but it does intrigue Tiepolo is wrong. sent10: the Jacobin does not fornicate. sent11: the fact that the fact that the househusband is a Cleveland and it does intrigue Tiepolo is wrong is right if that the Jacobin does not scale faith is not wrong. sent12: that the househusband is not a Cleveland and does fornicate is wrong.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Jacobin is a kind of a clearness that does not fornicate is not true if it scales faith.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jacobin scales faith.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Jacobin is a kind of a clearness and does not fornicate does not hold.; sent2 -> int3: the Jacobin is a clearness but it does not fornicate.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Jacobin does not scale faith.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the househusband is not a kind of a Cleveland and does intrigue Tiepolo.
sent7 -> int6: the househusband is not a Cleveland but it does intrigue Tiepolo if it scales faith.;
$hypothesis$ = the househusband is not a kind of a Cleveland but it does intrigue Tiepolo. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Jacobin does not intrigue Tiepolo and is a clearness is not correct. sent2: everything is a kind of a clearness that does not fornicate. sent3: the fact that the househusband does fornicate and is not a Cleveland does not hold if it is a clearness. sent4: that the househusband does scale faith but it does not intrigue Tiepolo is not right. sent5: everything does not fornicate. sent6: if something scales faith then that it is a clearness and does not fornicate is not right. sent7: something is not a Cleveland but it does intrigue Tiepolo if it scales faith. sent8: that the Jacobin is a kind of a clearness that fornicates is incorrect if it does scale faith. sent9: if the Jacobin does not scale faith then that the househusband is not a Cleveland but it does intrigue Tiepolo is wrong. sent10: the Jacobin does not fornicate. sent11: the fact that the fact that the househusband is a Cleveland and it does intrigue Tiepolo is wrong is right if that the Jacobin does not scale faith is not wrong. sent12: that the househusband is not a Cleveland and does fornicate is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that the Jacobin is a kind of a clearness that does not fornicate is not true if it scales faith.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jacobin scales faith.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Jacobin is a kind of a clearness and does not fornicate does not hold.; sent2 -> int3: the Jacobin is a clearness but it does not fornicate.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Jacobin does not scale faith.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__