there exists something such that if it is not textual and it is a whoopee then it is a hackwork.
sent1: that something does dissimulate is right if it is not textual but a whoopee. sent2: the hygrodeik is an ermine if it is not textual and it is a kind of a sternocleidomastoid. sent3: the basidiolichen is not a kind of a subcontractor if the limb is not a rib and/or is a subcontractor. sent4: something is obligational if it is a decoction and it is a modifier. sent5: if something does dissimulate then it is a hackwork. sent6: the fact that the easter proves and dissimulates is not incorrect if the basidiolichen is not a subcontractor.
sent1 -> int1: the hygrodeik dissimulates if it is not textual and is a whoopee.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hygrodeik is not textual but it is a whoopee is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hygrodeik dissimulates.; sent5 -> int3: the hygrodeik is a hackwork if that it does dissimulate hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hygrodeik is a hackwork.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: if the hygrodeik is a kind of non-textual thing that is a kind of a whoopee it is a hackwork.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the babka is a whoopee.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not textual and it is a whoopee then it is a hackwork. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does dissimulate is right if it is not textual but a whoopee. sent2: the hygrodeik is an ermine if it is not textual and it is a kind of a sternocleidomastoid. sent3: the basidiolichen is not a kind of a subcontractor if the limb is not a rib and/or is a subcontractor. sent4: something is obligational if it is a decoction and it is a modifier. sent5: if something does dissimulate then it is a hackwork. sent6: the fact that the easter proves and dissimulates is not incorrect if the basidiolichen is not a subcontractor. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the hygrodeik dissimulates if it is not textual and is a whoopee.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hygrodeik is not textual but it is a whoopee is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hygrodeik dissimulates.; sent5 -> int3: the hygrodeik is a hackwork if that it does dissimulate hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the hygrodeik is a hackwork.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: if the hygrodeik is a kind of non-textual thing that is a kind of a whoopee it is a hackwork.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__