the terrier is anatropous.
sent1: if the transferase is a kind of a unimportance then the tactician does not immortalize Anglesey. sent2: there exists something such that that it is both not intermediate and not a imperium is not right. sent3: if something immortalizes Anglesey then it is deformational. sent4: that if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of an intermediate and it is not a kind of a imperium is false the transferase is not deformational is correct. sent5: if the fact that the transferase is not a saiga is not wrong then the tactician does not immortalize Anglesey. sent6: the tactician is not a unimportance. sent7: if the terrier immortalizes Anglesey then it is anatropous. sent8: the transferase does immortalize Anglesey if the Guarani is non-ministerial thing that does immortalize Anglesey. sent9: if the fact that the tactician does not immortalize Anglesey hold that the terrier does coo Granth but it does not immortalize Anglesey is incorrect. sent10: the tactician does not coo Granth. sent11: something is anatropous if that it does coo Granth and does not immortalize Anglesey is not true. sent12: the transferase does not immortalize Anglesey if something is a unimportance.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the transferase is not deformational.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the terrier coos Granth but it does not immortalize Anglesey is not correct then it is anatropous.;
the terrier is not anatropous.
sent3 -> int3: if the transferase immortalizes Anglesey then it is deformational.; sent6 -> int4: something is not a unimportance.;
$hypothesis$ = the terrier is anatropous. ; $context$ = sent1: if the transferase is a kind of a unimportance then the tactician does not immortalize Anglesey. sent2: there exists something such that that it is both not intermediate and not a imperium is not right. sent3: if something immortalizes Anglesey then it is deformational. sent4: that if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of an intermediate and it is not a kind of a imperium is false the transferase is not deformational is correct. sent5: if the fact that the transferase is not a saiga is not wrong then the tactician does not immortalize Anglesey. sent6: the tactician is not a unimportance. sent7: if the terrier immortalizes Anglesey then it is anatropous. sent8: the transferase does immortalize Anglesey if the Guarani is non-ministerial thing that does immortalize Anglesey. sent9: if the fact that the tactician does not immortalize Anglesey hold that the terrier does coo Granth but it does not immortalize Anglesey is incorrect. sent10: the tactician does not coo Granth. sent11: something is anatropous if that it does coo Granth and does not immortalize Anglesey is not true. sent12: the transferase does not immortalize Anglesey if something is a unimportance. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the transferase is not deformational.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the terrier coos Granth but it does not immortalize Anglesey is not correct then it is anatropous.; __UNKNOWN__