the fact that the rocket is a kind of a poke or it does discourage or both is not true.
sent1: something that rears bathroom is non-burrlike and/or is not noncritical. sent2: the tympanum is burrlike if the alembic is a Amphioxidae and does not rear wahoo. sent3: if something is not burrlike then that it does not rear bathroom and pokes is wrong. sent4: if there is something such that that it is a Amphioxidae and it does not rear wahoo does not hold the rocket is a poke. sent5: the swatch rears bathroom and is a cicero. sent6: if the tympanum is burrlike that either the swatch is burrlike or it is not noncritical or both is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the alembic is a kind of a Amphioxidae and does not rear wahoo.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the tympanum is burrlike.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the fact that the swatch is not burrlike and/or it is not noncritical is not incorrect is not right.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the swatch rears bathroom is correct it is not burrlike or it is not noncritical or both.; sent5 -> int4: the swatch rears bathroom.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the swatch is not burrlike and/or it is not noncritical.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the alembic is a kind of a Amphioxidae that does not rear wahoo is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Amphioxidae and does not rear wahoo is false.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: that the rocket does poke is not incorrect.; int9 -> hypothesis;
either the troopship does rear bathroom or it is a mosque or both.
sent3 -> int10: the fact that the alembic does not rear bathroom but it does poke is not right if that it is not burrlike is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the rocket is a kind of a poke or it does discourage or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something that rears bathroom is non-burrlike and/or is not noncritical. sent2: the tympanum is burrlike if the alembic is a Amphioxidae and does not rear wahoo. sent3: if something is not burrlike then that it does not rear bathroom and pokes is wrong. sent4: if there is something such that that it is a Amphioxidae and it does not rear wahoo does not hold the rocket is a poke. sent5: the swatch rears bathroom and is a cicero. sent6: if the tympanum is burrlike that either the swatch is burrlike or it is not noncritical or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the alembic is a kind of a Amphioxidae and does not rear wahoo.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the tympanum is burrlike.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the fact that the swatch is not burrlike and/or it is not noncritical is not incorrect is not right.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the swatch rears bathroom is correct it is not burrlike or it is not noncritical or both.; sent5 -> int4: the swatch rears bathroom.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the swatch is not burrlike and/or it is not noncritical.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the alembic is a kind of a Amphioxidae that does not rear wahoo is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Amphioxidae and does not rear wahoo is false.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: that the rocket does poke is not incorrect.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__