the milling is not extrasensory.
sent1: if that something does not confederate cephalexin but it is a lease is false it is not a synergism. sent2: the milling is lossless. sent3: the chordate is not extrasensory. sent4: that the chordate does confederate cephalexin and leases is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the whorehouse is not a synergism is correct. sent6: the milling is not extrasensory if it is a kind of a Jesus. sent7: the snorer is alvine. sent8: something is a synergism if it is a kind of a Jesus. sent9: that if the whorehouse does not confederate cephalexin but it is a kind of a dependant the milling is extrasensory is correct. sent10: the snorer is a Jesus. sent11: if the whorehouse is a dependant then the fact that the chordate does not confederate cephalexin but it leases is false. sent12: the milling is not a dependant. sent13: the snorer is extrasensory if the milling is not extrasensory. sent14: if something is not a synergism then the fact that it is a Jesus and it is a lease does not hold. sent15: if the snorer is a Jesus the fact that the chordate is a kind of a Jesus is true. sent16: something does not confederate cephalexin and is a dependant if it is not a kind of a lease.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the milling is extrasensory.; sent1 -> int1: if that the chordate does not confederate cephalexin but it does lease is not correct then it is not a synergism.; sent8 -> int2: if the chordate is a kind of a Jesus it is a synergism.; sent15 & sent10 -> int3: the chordate is a Jesus.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chordate is a synergism.;
the fact that the milling is extrasensory is not false.
sent16 -> int5: if the whorehouse is not a kind of a lease then it does not confederate cephalexin and it is a kind of a dependant.; sent14 -> int6: if the snorer is not a synergism then the fact that it is a Jesus and it is a kind of a lease is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the milling is not extrasensory. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does not confederate cephalexin but it is a lease is false it is not a synergism. sent2: the milling is lossless. sent3: the chordate is not extrasensory. sent4: that the chordate does confederate cephalexin and leases is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the whorehouse is not a synergism is correct. sent6: the milling is not extrasensory if it is a kind of a Jesus. sent7: the snorer is alvine. sent8: something is a synergism if it is a kind of a Jesus. sent9: that if the whorehouse does not confederate cephalexin but it is a kind of a dependant the milling is extrasensory is correct. sent10: the snorer is a Jesus. sent11: if the whorehouse is a dependant then the fact that the chordate does not confederate cephalexin but it leases is false. sent12: the milling is not a dependant. sent13: the snorer is extrasensory if the milling is not extrasensory. sent14: if something is not a synergism then the fact that it is a Jesus and it is a lease does not hold. sent15: if the snorer is a Jesus the fact that the chordate is a kind of a Jesus is true. sent16: something does not confederate cephalexin and is a dependant if it is not a kind of a lease. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the milling is extrasensory.; sent1 -> int1: if that the chordate does not confederate cephalexin but it does lease is not correct then it is not a synergism.; sent8 -> int2: if the chordate is a kind of a Jesus it is a synergism.; sent15 & sent10 -> int3: the chordate is a Jesus.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chordate is a synergism.; __UNKNOWN__