the oilrig is an elegance and it is a kind of a paleoethnography.
sent1: if the neuroepithelium is not a kind of a frock that the bronchiole is an elegance and it is macrobiotics is wrong. sent2: the fact that the mincemeat is not an elegance is not wrong. sent3: something that does not name fanion is a glowworm. sent4: that something is a trabecula and it does frock is not right if it does not bayonet incipiency. sent5: the oilrig is a paleoethnography. sent6: if the fact that the bronchiole is a paleoethnography but it does not bayonet incipiency does not hold then the fact that the oilrig is not a kind of a frock is not false. sent7: the fact that if the neuroepithelium is not a kind of a trabecula then the fact that the bronchiole is a kind of macrobiotics thing that is not a paleoethnography is false is correct. sent8: if the fact that the bronchiole is both a trabecula and not a frock is wrong then the oilrig does not bayonet incipiency. sent9: if something is not a paleoethnography it does frock and is macrobiotics. sent10: something is a trabecula that is a paleoethnography if it is not an elegance. sent11: the oilrig is a paleoethnography if it does not bayonet incipiency. sent12: the fact that the oilrig is macrobiotics but it is not an elegance does not hold if the bronchiole is not a trabecula. sent13: the bronchiole does not bayonet incipiency. sent14: everything is not macrobiotics. sent15: something is not macrobiotics if that it is a trabecula and a frock is wrong. sent16: if the neuroepithelium is not macrobiotics then that the bronchiole is a trabecula but it is not a frock is not right. sent17: the oilrig does not bayonet incipiency if the bronchiole frocks. sent18: the oilrig is not a frock if the fact that the bronchiole is a kind of an elegance but it is not a paleoethnography is not true.
sent14 -> int1: the neuroepithelium is not macrobiotics.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the fact that the bronchiole is a kind of a trabecula but it is not a frock hold is not true.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the oilrig does not bayonet incipiency.;
that the oilrig is an elegance and is a kind of a paleoethnography is incorrect.
sent15 -> int4: the fact that the bronchiole is not macrobiotics is true if that it is a trabecula and it is a frock is not correct.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the bronchiole is a trabecula and it does frock does not hold if it does not bayonet incipiency.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the fact that the bronchiole is a trabecula that is a kind of a frock does not hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the bronchiole is not macrobiotics.;
$hypothesis$ = the oilrig is an elegance and it is a kind of a paleoethnography. ; $context$ = sent1: if the neuroepithelium is not a kind of a frock that the bronchiole is an elegance and it is macrobiotics is wrong. sent2: the fact that the mincemeat is not an elegance is not wrong. sent3: something that does not name fanion is a glowworm. sent4: that something is a trabecula and it does frock is not right if it does not bayonet incipiency. sent5: the oilrig is a paleoethnography. sent6: if the fact that the bronchiole is a paleoethnography but it does not bayonet incipiency does not hold then the fact that the oilrig is not a kind of a frock is not false. sent7: the fact that if the neuroepithelium is not a kind of a trabecula then the fact that the bronchiole is a kind of macrobiotics thing that is not a paleoethnography is false is correct. sent8: if the fact that the bronchiole is both a trabecula and not a frock is wrong then the oilrig does not bayonet incipiency. sent9: if something is not a paleoethnography it does frock and is macrobiotics. sent10: something is a trabecula that is a paleoethnography if it is not an elegance. sent11: the oilrig is a paleoethnography if it does not bayonet incipiency. sent12: the fact that the oilrig is macrobiotics but it is not an elegance does not hold if the bronchiole is not a trabecula. sent13: the bronchiole does not bayonet incipiency. sent14: everything is not macrobiotics. sent15: something is not macrobiotics if that it is a trabecula and a frock is wrong. sent16: if the neuroepithelium is not macrobiotics then that the bronchiole is a trabecula but it is not a frock is not right. sent17: the oilrig does not bayonet incipiency if the bronchiole frocks. sent18: the oilrig is not a frock if the fact that the bronchiole is a kind of an elegance but it is not a paleoethnography is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the neuroepithelium is not macrobiotics.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the fact that the bronchiole is a kind of a trabecula but it is not a frock hold is not true.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the oilrig does not bayonet incipiency.; __UNKNOWN__