the waning does not occur.
sent1: both the milling and the detachableness happens. sent2: the titillation does not occur. sent3: the imperceptibleness does not occur. sent4: the agraphicness occurs but the extrusion does not occur. sent5: the fact that the counteroffensive does not occur is correct. sent6: the waning does not occur if the chromaticness and the broadsiding Lamium happens. sent7: the broadsiding Lamium happens but the imperceptibleness does not occur. sent8: if the canonization does not occur the affiliation happens and the articulatedness occurs. sent9: the canonization happens and the chromaticness happens.
sent9 -> int1: the chromaticness happens.; sent7 -> int2: the broadsiding Lamium occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chromaticness and the broadsiding Lamium happens.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the affiliation occurs and the articulatedness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the waning does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the milling and the detachableness happens. sent2: the titillation does not occur. sent3: the imperceptibleness does not occur. sent4: the agraphicness occurs but the extrusion does not occur. sent5: the fact that the counteroffensive does not occur is correct. sent6: the waning does not occur if the chromaticness and the broadsiding Lamium happens. sent7: the broadsiding Lamium happens but the imperceptibleness does not occur. sent8: if the canonization does not occur the affiliation happens and the articulatedness occurs. sent9: the canonization happens and the chromaticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the chromaticness happens.; sent7 -> int2: the broadsiding Lamium occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chromaticness and the broadsiding Lamium happens.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__