the fact that the gadabout does not concoct crappie is not incorrect.
sent1: the tenderfoot glares particular if something does geminate unconscientiousness and/or is a blouse. sent2: if the tenderfoot does glare particular then that the gadabout does not glare corruptibility and it does not glare particular does not hold. sent3: the female is a blouse. sent4: the fact that the gadabout glares corruptibility but it does not glare particular is not true. sent5: if there is something such that it does geminate unconscientiousness the tenderfoot does glare particular. sent6: something does not concoct crappie if that it does not glare corruptibility and it does not glare particular is false. sent7: the fact that the female does not concoct crappie and is not a blouse is not true. sent8: if something does glare corruptibility it does not concoct crappie.
sent3 -> int1: the female either does geminate unconscientiousness or is a blouse or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does geminate unconscientiousness and/or it is a blouse.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the tenderfoot does glare particular.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the gadabout does not glare corruptibility and does not glare particular is not right.; sent6 -> int5: the gadabout does not concoct crappie if the fact that it does not glare corruptibility and does not glare particular is not true.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the gadabout does not concoct crappie is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the tenderfoot glares particular if something does geminate unconscientiousness and/or is a blouse. sent2: if the tenderfoot does glare particular then that the gadabout does not glare corruptibility and it does not glare particular does not hold. sent3: the female is a blouse. sent4: the fact that the gadabout glares corruptibility but it does not glare particular is not true. sent5: if there is something such that it does geminate unconscientiousness the tenderfoot does glare particular. sent6: something does not concoct crappie if that it does not glare corruptibility and it does not glare particular is false. sent7: the fact that the female does not concoct crappie and is not a blouse is not true. sent8: if something does glare corruptibility it does not concoct crappie. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the female either does geminate unconscientiousness or is a blouse or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does geminate unconscientiousness and/or it is a blouse.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the tenderfoot does glare particular.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the gadabout does not glare corruptibility and does not glare particular is not right.; sent6 -> int5: the gadabout does not concoct crappie if the fact that it does not glare corruptibility and does not glare particular is not true.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__