the Best is a Puritan.
sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of non-husbandly thing that is a glint is not correct then the fact that it is a Puritan is right. sent2: the consuetudinary is husbandly if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a supplejack and/or it is not a cyclamen is wrong. sent3: that the oligosaccharide is not a moat but a glint is not correct if the consuetudinary is husbandly. sent4: if there is something such that it is both a pictorial and not a thundering then the Best is not a kind of a Puritan. sent5: that the pool is not a kind of a supplejack or it is a cyclamen or both hold. sent6: if the pool is not headless then the endothelium is pictorial but it is not a thundering. sent7: if the endothelium is not a cyclamen then the oligosaccharide is a moat but it is not a kind of a pictorial. sent8: the oligosaccharide is not a moat and is a kind of a glint. sent9: if either the pool is not a supplejack or it is not a cyclamen or both it is not headless.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pool either is not a kind of a supplejack or is not a cyclamen or both does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a supplejack and/or it is not a cyclamen does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the consuetudinary is husbandly.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the oligosaccharide is not a moat but it is a kind of a glint does not hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the pool is not a kind of a supplejack and/or is not a cyclamen.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the pool is not headless.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the endothelium is a pictorial but it is not a thundering.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is a kind of a pictorial and it does not thunder.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the Best is a Puritan.
sent1 -> int9: if the fact that the Best is not husbandly and is a glint is incorrect then it is a kind of a Puritan.;
$hypothesis$ = the Best is a Puritan. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of non-husbandly thing that is a glint is not correct then the fact that it is a Puritan is right. sent2: the consuetudinary is husbandly if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a supplejack and/or it is not a cyclamen is wrong. sent3: that the oligosaccharide is not a moat but a glint is not correct if the consuetudinary is husbandly. sent4: if there is something such that it is both a pictorial and not a thundering then the Best is not a kind of a Puritan. sent5: that the pool is not a kind of a supplejack or it is a cyclamen or both hold. sent6: if the pool is not headless then the endothelium is pictorial but it is not a thundering. sent7: if the endothelium is not a cyclamen then the oligosaccharide is a moat but it is not a kind of a pictorial. sent8: the oligosaccharide is not a moat and is a kind of a glint. sent9: if either the pool is not a supplejack or it is not a cyclamen or both it is not headless. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pool either is not a kind of a supplejack or is not a cyclamen or both does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a supplejack and/or it is not a cyclamen does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the consuetudinary is husbandly.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the oligosaccharide is not a moat but it is a kind of a glint does not hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the pool is not a kind of a supplejack and/or is not a cyclamen.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the pool is not headless.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the endothelium is a pictorial but it is not a thundering.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is a kind of a pictorial and it does not thunder.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__