the albumin is not a recission and it is not a kind of a apoenzyme.
sent1: the fact that the curacao is not a kind of a bait and it is not a apoenzyme is not correct. sent2: that everything is not a Lorca and it is not a bait hold. sent3: if something does not bait and it is not a kind of a Lorca the curacao is a kind of a apoenzyme. sent4: everything does not harlequin albumin and does not hue charitableness. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a recission and it is not a Lorca then the curacao is a apoenzyme. sent6: if something that is a kind of a recission is not a Lorca then that the albumin is a apoenzyme is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the curacao is not a apoenzyme and is not a Lorca is not right. sent8: the fact that the fuddy-duddy is both not a apoenzyme and a recission is not right. sent9: that the albumin is not a recission and not a apoenzyme is incorrect if the fuddy-duddy is a apoenzyme. sent10: if something that is not a recission is a kind of a bait the albumin is a kind of a apoenzyme. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a apoenzyme and is not a bait. sent12: the curacao is a kind of a apoenzyme if something that is not a recission is not a bait. sent13: if something that is not a Lorca is not a bait then the fuddy-duddy is a kind of a apoenzyme. sent14: something is not thermometric and it is not adaptive. sent15: the fact that the curacao is a Lorca and is not a apoenzyme does not hold if the fuddy-duddy is a apoenzyme. sent16: the fact that the accordionist is not a bait and is a kind of a osteotomy is not true. sent17: if the fact that the curacao is a apoenzyme is correct that the albumin is a kind of a bait that is not a apoenzyme is incorrect. sent18: that the albumin is not a apoenzyme but it is a kind of a bait is not true if the fact that the curacao is a bait is correct.
sent2 -> int1: the curacao is not a Lorca and it is not a bait.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a Lorca and it is not a bait.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: that the fuddy-duddy is a apoenzyme is correct.; sent9 & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the albumin is not a recission and it is not a kind of a apoenzyme. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the curacao is not a kind of a bait and it is not a apoenzyme is not correct. sent2: that everything is not a Lorca and it is not a bait hold. sent3: if something does not bait and it is not a kind of a Lorca the curacao is a kind of a apoenzyme. sent4: everything does not harlequin albumin and does not hue charitableness. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a recission and it is not a Lorca then the curacao is a apoenzyme. sent6: if something that is a kind of a recission is not a Lorca then that the albumin is a apoenzyme is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the curacao is not a apoenzyme and is not a Lorca is not right. sent8: the fact that the fuddy-duddy is both not a apoenzyme and a recission is not right. sent9: that the albumin is not a recission and not a apoenzyme is incorrect if the fuddy-duddy is a apoenzyme. sent10: if something that is not a recission is a kind of a bait the albumin is a kind of a apoenzyme. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a apoenzyme and is not a bait. sent12: the curacao is a kind of a apoenzyme if something that is not a recission is not a bait. sent13: if something that is not a Lorca is not a bait then the fuddy-duddy is a kind of a apoenzyme. sent14: something is not thermometric and it is not adaptive. sent15: the fact that the curacao is a Lorca and is not a apoenzyme does not hold if the fuddy-duddy is a apoenzyme. sent16: the fact that the accordionist is not a bait and is a kind of a osteotomy is not true. sent17: if the fact that the curacao is a apoenzyme is correct that the albumin is a kind of a bait that is not a apoenzyme is incorrect. sent18: that the albumin is not a apoenzyme but it is a kind of a bait is not true if the fact that the curacao is a bait is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the curacao is not a Lorca and it is not a bait.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a Lorca and it is not a bait.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: that the fuddy-duddy is a apoenzyme is correct.; sent9 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__