the operativeness occurs.
sent1: the small-capitalizationness happens. sent2: if the eavesdropping does not occur but the congregationalness occurs then the addictiveness does not occur. sent3: the non-congregationalness leads to that the eavesdropping occurs and the vaticinating does not occur. sent4: the fact that the adjustment does not occur is right. sent5: the galling by-and-by happens. sent6: that the submersion happens yields that the eavesdropping does not occur and the congregationalness happens. sent7: if the addictiveness happens the small-capitalizationness happens. sent8: the collecting occurs but the spilling does not occur if that the variegating state happens is not false. sent9: if both the non-existentialistness and the submersion occurs then the congregationalness does not occur. sent10: if the vaticinating or the nonaddictiveness or both occurs the atheisticness does not occur. sent11: that the submersion does not occur is prevented by the existentialistness. sent12: if the vaticinating does not occur that the operative and the addictiveness occurs is true. sent13: the addictiveness happens. sent14: that the small-capitalizationness happens but the operative does not occur is brought about by that the addictiveness happens.
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the small-capitalizationness but not the operative occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the operative occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the operativeness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the small-capitalizationness happens. sent2: if the eavesdropping does not occur but the congregationalness occurs then the addictiveness does not occur. sent3: the non-congregationalness leads to that the eavesdropping occurs and the vaticinating does not occur. sent4: the fact that the adjustment does not occur is right. sent5: the galling by-and-by happens. sent6: that the submersion happens yields that the eavesdropping does not occur and the congregationalness happens. sent7: if the addictiveness happens the small-capitalizationness happens. sent8: the collecting occurs but the spilling does not occur if that the variegating state happens is not false. sent9: if both the non-existentialistness and the submersion occurs then the congregationalness does not occur. sent10: if the vaticinating or the nonaddictiveness or both occurs the atheisticness does not occur. sent11: that the submersion does not occur is prevented by the existentialistness. sent12: if the vaticinating does not occur that the operative and the addictiveness occurs is true. sent13: the addictiveness happens. sent14: that the small-capitalizationness happens but the operative does not occur is brought about by that the addictiveness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: the small-capitalizationness but not the operative occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__