the fronting Indra does not occur.
sent1: if the humming occurs then the pistillateness occurs. sent2: the Kiplingesqueness occurs. sent3: that the rending does not occur and the confusing K.E. occurs is not true if the indexicalness does not occur. sent4: if the humming does not occur the thuggery does not occur and the doubleheader does not occur. sent5: if the fact that not the rending but the confusing K.E. happens is false the fronting Indra does not occur. sent6: the doubleheader occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the humming does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the thuggery does not occur and the doubleheader does not occur is correct.; int1 -> int2: the doubleheader does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the humming occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the pistillateness occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the pistillateness and the Kiplingesqueness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fronting Indra does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the humming occurs then the pistillateness occurs. sent2: the Kiplingesqueness occurs. sent3: that the rending does not occur and the confusing K.E. occurs is not true if the indexicalness does not occur. sent4: if the humming does not occur the thuggery does not occur and the doubleheader does not occur. sent5: if the fact that not the rending but the confusing K.E. happens is false the fronting Indra does not occur. sent6: the doubleheader occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the humming does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the thuggery does not occur and the doubleheader does not occur is correct.; int1 -> int2: the doubleheader does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the humming occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the pistillateness occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the pistillateness and the Kiplingesqueness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__