the acaricide is not a Hyla.
sent1: if that the skidpan does roughen DISA and is not a demand is wrong the acaricide is a kind of a Hyla. sent2: if the fact that the skidpan does not demand and is not a ammonification is not correct the divi-divi is not a kind of a Cornell. sent3: the artiste is not a kind of a dentist. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a inexplicitness the microdot does not overpay. sent5: the fact that the acaricide is not a kind of a womanhood and it is not a goddess is not correct if the divi-divi is not a Cornell. sent6: if the artiste is not a dentist the fact that it skids bombazine and does not protect does not hold. sent7: if that something is not a womanhood and not a goddess is false it is not a Hyla. sent8: the office-bearer is not a kind of a inexplicitness if there is something such that that it skids bombazine and does not protect is wrong. sent9: the Clydesdale is a kind of a womanhood if there is something such that it does not overpay. sent10: there is something such that it does roughen DISA. sent11: if there is something such that it is a womanhood the treponema is both a goddess and not a Cornell. sent12: the fact that the skidpan does roughen DISA but it does not demand does not hold if the divi-divi is not a ammonification.
sent7 -> int1: the acaricide is not a Hyla if the fact that it is not a womanhood and it is not a goddess is not true.;
the acaricide is a Hyla.
sent6 & sent3 -> int2: that the artiste does skid bombazine but it does not protect is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it does skid bombazine and it does not protect is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the office-bearer is not a inexplicitness.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a inexplicitness hold.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the microdot does not overpay.; int6 -> int7: something does not overpay.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the Clydesdale is a womanhood.; int8 -> int9: something is a womanhood.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the treponema is a kind of a goddess but it is not a Cornell.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is a kind of a goddess and it is not a Cornell.;
$hypothesis$ = the acaricide is not a Hyla. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the skidpan does roughen DISA and is not a demand is wrong the acaricide is a kind of a Hyla. sent2: if the fact that the skidpan does not demand and is not a ammonification is not correct the divi-divi is not a kind of a Cornell. sent3: the artiste is not a kind of a dentist. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a inexplicitness the microdot does not overpay. sent5: the fact that the acaricide is not a kind of a womanhood and it is not a goddess is not correct if the divi-divi is not a Cornell. sent6: if the artiste is not a dentist the fact that it skids bombazine and does not protect does not hold. sent7: if that something is not a womanhood and not a goddess is false it is not a Hyla. sent8: the office-bearer is not a kind of a inexplicitness if there is something such that that it skids bombazine and does not protect is wrong. sent9: the Clydesdale is a kind of a womanhood if there is something such that it does not overpay. sent10: there is something such that it does roughen DISA. sent11: if there is something such that it is a womanhood the treponema is both a goddess and not a Cornell. sent12: the fact that the skidpan does roughen DISA but it does not demand does not hold if the divi-divi is not a ammonification. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the acaricide is not a Hyla if the fact that it is not a womanhood and it is not a goddess is not true.; __UNKNOWN__