the feldspar is not a dynamic.
sent1: the crusher deactivates ruck or it does not craze or both if there exists something such that it is ossicular. sent2: if the feldspar is a playsuit the corpuscle is a kind of an artiodactyl. sent3: the corpuscle is a playsuit. sent4: if the reovirus is not an artiodactyl that the corpuscle is both not a wateriness and not a discharge does not hold. sent5: the Kurd discharges if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a wateriness and is not a discharges is not right. sent6: that the corpuscle is pyknotic is correct if the Kurd is a playsuit. sent7: the fact that if the stentor is non-ossicular but it is albuminuric then the Pianola is non-ossicular is true. sent8: the feldspar is not a dynamic if the corpuscle is pyknotic and it discharges. sent9: the biologist is a samekh and it is a playsuit if it is not a wateriness. sent10: if the Kurd is pyknotic the corpuscle does cascade jackfruit. sent11: either something does not deactivate ruck or it crazes or both. sent12: if the crusher does deactivate ruck then the fact that the reovirus is not a kind of an artiodactyl is correct. sent13: if the Kurd is a playsuit and it is an artiodactyl the corpuscle does not discharge. sent14: the stentor is a kind of non-ossicular thing that is albuminuric. sent15: either the corpuscle is pyknotic or it does cascade jackfruit or both. sent16: the corpuscle is an artiodactyl and a discharge. sent17: something does cascade jackfruit if it is pyknotic. sent18: the corpuscle is pyknotic if the Kurd cascades jackfruit. sent19: the Kurd is a playsuit and/or it does cascade jackfruit. sent20: the corpuscle is a kind of an artiodactyl. sent21: the biologist is not a wateriness if there exists something such that it does not deactivate ruck and/or does craze. sent22: if the crusher is not a craze then the reovirus is non-artiodactyl. sent23: the corker is artiodactyl and/or it is nonarboreal.
sent19 & sent6 & sent18 -> int1: the corpuscle is pyknotic.; sent16 -> int2: the corpuscle is a discharge.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the corpuscle is a kind of pyknotic thing that discharges.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the biologist is a samekh and it is artiodactyl.
sent11 & sent21 -> int4: the biologist is not a wateriness.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the biologist is a samekh and it is a playsuit.; int5 -> int6: the biologist is a samekh.;
$hypothesis$ = the feldspar is not a dynamic. ; $context$ = sent1: the crusher deactivates ruck or it does not craze or both if there exists something such that it is ossicular. sent2: if the feldspar is a playsuit the corpuscle is a kind of an artiodactyl. sent3: the corpuscle is a playsuit. sent4: if the reovirus is not an artiodactyl that the corpuscle is both not a wateriness and not a discharge does not hold. sent5: the Kurd discharges if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a wateriness and is not a discharges is not right. sent6: that the corpuscle is pyknotic is correct if the Kurd is a playsuit. sent7: the fact that if the stentor is non-ossicular but it is albuminuric then the Pianola is non-ossicular is true. sent8: the feldspar is not a dynamic if the corpuscle is pyknotic and it discharges. sent9: the biologist is a samekh and it is a playsuit if it is not a wateriness. sent10: if the Kurd is pyknotic the corpuscle does cascade jackfruit. sent11: either something does not deactivate ruck or it crazes or both. sent12: if the crusher does deactivate ruck then the fact that the reovirus is not a kind of an artiodactyl is correct. sent13: if the Kurd is a playsuit and it is an artiodactyl the corpuscle does not discharge. sent14: the stentor is a kind of non-ossicular thing that is albuminuric. sent15: either the corpuscle is pyknotic or it does cascade jackfruit or both. sent16: the corpuscle is an artiodactyl and a discharge. sent17: something does cascade jackfruit if it is pyknotic. sent18: the corpuscle is pyknotic if the Kurd cascades jackfruit. sent19: the Kurd is a playsuit and/or it does cascade jackfruit. sent20: the corpuscle is a kind of an artiodactyl. sent21: the biologist is not a wateriness if there exists something such that it does not deactivate ruck and/or does craze. sent22: if the crusher is not a craze then the reovirus is non-artiodactyl. sent23: the corker is artiodactyl and/or it is nonarboreal. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent6 & sent18 -> int1: the corpuscle is pyknotic.; sent16 -> int2: the corpuscle is a discharge.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the corpuscle is a kind of pyknotic thing that discharges.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__