the splint does not tease pellucidness.
sent1: if that something does haze splint but it does not profess does not hold it does not haze splint. sent2: the splint is intrauterine if the isoagglutinogen is intransitive. sent3: if something is a intransitive then it does tease pellucidness. sent4: the fact that the splint is not intransitive is true. sent5: the mason does not tease pellucidness. sent6: there exists something such that it does not haze splint. sent7: the fact that either the spy is a kind of a puffery or it does profess or both is false. sent8: if there are non-carboxyl things then the fact that the fact that the isoagglutinogen is a non-carboxyl but it is not a tumor is wrong is not false. sent9: the isoagglutinogen is not intrauterine. sent10: if the isoagglutinogen is a intransitive the splint is not a tumor but intrauterine. sent11: if that something is point-of-sale and is not a RA is not true it is not point-of-sale. sent12: the splint is maxillary. sent13: the isoagglutinogen is not a incommutability and does surmise coupling. sent14: there exists something such that it is transitive. sent15: something does haze splint. sent16: there is something such that it is not intrauterine. sent17: if that there exists something such that it does not haze splint is right then that the splint does haze splint but it does not profess does not hold. sent18: the isoagglutinogen is intransitive. sent19: the splint is not a speechlessness. sent20: if something does not haze splint and is not a tumor then it does not tease pellucidness. sent21: the coupling does not haze isoagglutinogen but it is a intransitive. sent22: if the fact that the splint is intransitive but not intrauterine is incorrect it is not intransitive. sent23: that the splint is intrauterine is correct. sent24: everything does tease mason. sent25: if the fact that something is an umbilical that is not a kind of a linemen is incorrect then it is not an umbilical.
sent10 & sent18 -> int1: that the splint is not a tumor and is intrauterine is true.; int1 -> int2: the splint is not a kind of a tumor.; sent1 -> int3: the splint does not haze splint if that it does haze splint and does not profess is wrong.; sent6 & sent17 -> int4: that the fact that the splint hazes splint and does not profess hold does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the splint does not haze splint is true.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the splint does not haze splint and is not a tumor.; sent20 -> int7: if the fact that the splint does not haze splint and it is not a tumor hold then it does not tease pellucidness.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the splint does tease pellucidness is correct.
sent3 -> int8: the splint does tease pellucidness if it is a intransitive.; sent7 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a puffery or it professes or both is wrong.; sent24 -> int10: the isoagglutinogen teases mason.;
$hypothesis$ = the splint does not tease pellucidness. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does haze splint but it does not profess does not hold it does not haze splint. sent2: the splint is intrauterine if the isoagglutinogen is intransitive. sent3: if something is a intransitive then it does tease pellucidness. sent4: the fact that the splint is not intransitive is true. sent5: the mason does not tease pellucidness. sent6: there exists something such that it does not haze splint. sent7: the fact that either the spy is a kind of a puffery or it does profess or both is false. sent8: if there are non-carboxyl things then the fact that the fact that the isoagglutinogen is a non-carboxyl but it is not a tumor is wrong is not false. sent9: the isoagglutinogen is not intrauterine. sent10: if the isoagglutinogen is a intransitive the splint is not a tumor but intrauterine. sent11: if that something is point-of-sale and is not a RA is not true it is not point-of-sale. sent12: the splint is maxillary. sent13: the isoagglutinogen is not a incommutability and does surmise coupling. sent14: there exists something such that it is transitive. sent15: something does haze splint. sent16: there is something such that it is not intrauterine. sent17: if that there exists something such that it does not haze splint is right then that the splint does haze splint but it does not profess does not hold. sent18: the isoagglutinogen is intransitive. sent19: the splint is not a speechlessness. sent20: if something does not haze splint and is not a tumor then it does not tease pellucidness. sent21: the coupling does not haze isoagglutinogen but it is a intransitive. sent22: if the fact that the splint is intransitive but not intrauterine is incorrect it is not intransitive. sent23: that the splint is intrauterine is correct. sent24: everything does tease mason. sent25: if the fact that something is an umbilical that is not a kind of a linemen is incorrect then it is not an umbilical. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent18 -> int1: that the splint is not a tumor and is intrauterine is true.; int1 -> int2: the splint is not a kind of a tumor.; sent1 -> int3: the splint does not haze splint if that it does haze splint and does not profess is wrong.; sent6 & sent17 -> int4: that the fact that the splint hazes splint and does not profess hold does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the splint does not haze splint is true.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the splint does not haze splint and is not a tumor.; sent20 -> int7: if the fact that the splint does not haze splint and it is not a tumor hold then it does not tease pellucidness.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__