that if the comforting Sceliphron does not occur the blastomericness but not the fibbing happens is not true.
sent1: if that the stoop does not occur and the cutting does not occur is wrong the fibbing does not occur. sent2: the fact that that the stooping does not occur and the cut does not occur is false is true. sent3: the fact that the comforting Sceliphron does not occur and the blastomericness does not occur is false. sent4: the despoticness does not occur. sent5: that the depolarization does not occur and the dichromaticness does not occur is not right. sent6: that the movement happens results in that the nonclassicalness occurs but the enactment does not occur. sent7: the fact that the adhesion does not occur and the ravaging does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the comforting Sceliphron does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the blastomericness does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the comforting Sceliphron does not occur and the blastomericness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the blastomericness happens.; sent1 & sent2 -> int4: the fib does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the blastomericness happens but the fib does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the comforting Sceliphron does not occur the blastomericness but not the fibbing happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the stoop does not occur and the cutting does not occur is wrong the fibbing does not occur. sent2: the fact that that the stooping does not occur and the cut does not occur is false is true. sent3: the fact that the comforting Sceliphron does not occur and the blastomericness does not occur is false. sent4: the despoticness does not occur. sent5: that the depolarization does not occur and the dichromaticness does not occur is not right. sent6: that the movement happens results in that the nonclassicalness occurs but the enactment does not occur. sent7: the fact that the adhesion does not occur and the ravaging does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the comforting Sceliphron does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the blastomericness does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the comforting Sceliphron does not occur and the blastomericness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the blastomericness happens.; sent1 & sent2 -> int4: the fib does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the blastomericness happens but the fib does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__