the fact that if the taoiseach is unconstitutional then the portfolio puts Anzio is not right.
sent1: the fact that something is not unconstitutional and is not a kind of a snowshoe does not hold if it does not put Anzio. sent2: the fact that something is representational is not false if it is unconstitutional. sent3: if the portfolio is a snowshoe the taoiseach is unconstitutional and/or it does not put Anzio. sent4: the portfolio is unconstitutional if the taoiseach does put Anzio. sent5: the portfolio is representational if the fact that the taoiseach is unconstitutional is right. sent6: something that dissipates is therapeutic and is not noncrystalline. sent7: if that the portfolio is representational is true the fact that it does put Anzio is not false. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it does not dissipate and it does not tweet abhorrer is not true. sent9: if the fact that the portfolio is noncrystalline is right the taoiseach does not put Anzio and is therapeutic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the taoiseach is unconstitutional.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the portfolio is representational.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the portfolio does put Anzio.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the macroeconomist is representational.
sent2 -> int3: that the macroeconomist is representational if the macroeconomist is unconstitutional is not false.; sent1 -> int4: if the taoiseach does not put Anzio that it is not unconstitutional and is not a kind of a snowshoe is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the taoiseach is unconstitutional then the portfolio puts Anzio is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not unconstitutional and is not a kind of a snowshoe does not hold if it does not put Anzio. sent2: the fact that something is representational is not false if it is unconstitutional. sent3: if the portfolio is a snowshoe the taoiseach is unconstitutional and/or it does not put Anzio. sent4: the portfolio is unconstitutional if the taoiseach does put Anzio. sent5: the portfolio is representational if the fact that the taoiseach is unconstitutional is right. sent6: something that dissipates is therapeutic and is not noncrystalline. sent7: if that the portfolio is representational is true the fact that it does put Anzio is not false. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it does not dissipate and it does not tweet abhorrer is not true. sent9: if the fact that the portfolio is noncrystalline is right the taoiseach does not put Anzio and is therapeutic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the taoiseach is unconstitutional.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the portfolio is representational.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the portfolio does put Anzio.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__