that the pensioner does bawl oxford hold.
sent1: something does not bawl oxford if the fact that it is not a Duma and is not a native is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a native is true then the pensioner is not a love-in-a-mist but it is uricosuric. sent3: if something is both not a love-in-a-mist and uricosuric it is not a Duma. sent4: if the pensioner is not polyphonic but it is a kind of an ebb it is not uricosuric. sent5: something is a desert. sent6: something is addictive. sent7: if something is not a Duma it does bawl oxford. sent8: if there exists something such that it is uricosuric then the cornhusker does not mask formation and does mask dibble. sent9: the pensioner is a materiality. sent10: if the quadrupling is a love-in-a-mist and it is grassy then it is not monophonic. sent11: something is a native.
sent3 -> int1: if the pensioner is not a kind of a love-in-a-mist but it is uricosuric it is not a Duma.; sent11 & sent2 -> int2: the pensioner is not a love-in-a-mist and is uricosuric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pensioner is not a Duma.; sent7 -> int4: the pensioner bawls oxford if the fact that it is not a Duma is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the pensioner does not bawl oxford.
sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the pensioner is not a kind of a Duma and is not a native does not hold it does not bawl oxford.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pensioner does bawl oxford hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not bawl oxford if the fact that it is not a Duma and is not a native is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a native is true then the pensioner is not a love-in-a-mist but it is uricosuric. sent3: if something is both not a love-in-a-mist and uricosuric it is not a Duma. sent4: if the pensioner is not polyphonic but it is a kind of an ebb it is not uricosuric. sent5: something is a desert. sent6: something is addictive. sent7: if something is not a Duma it does bawl oxford. sent8: if there exists something such that it is uricosuric then the cornhusker does not mask formation and does mask dibble. sent9: the pensioner is a materiality. sent10: if the quadrupling is a love-in-a-mist and it is grassy then it is not monophonic. sent11: something is a native. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the pensioner is not a kind of a love-in-a-mist but it is uricosuric it is not a Duma.; sent11 & sent2 -> int2: the pensioner is not a love-in-a-mist and is uricosuric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pensioner is not a Duma.; sent7 -> int4: the pensioner bawls oxford if the fact that it is not a Duma is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__