the slip meshes.
sent1: the lakeside is monocarpic. sent2: if something is unsold then the fact that it is a kind of a Tyr and/or it is not monocarpic is not true. sent3: if the soupfin is not a kind of an appointment that the slip is not comprehensible and not non-conspecific does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the soupfin is a kind of a Curl is not wrong the fact that it does not festoon cloaked and it is intradermal is not false. sent5: if that the scanning does not mesh and it is not a Tyr is wrong that it is planktonic is not false. sent6: the slip is monocarpic but not a mesh if the lakeside is a Tyr. sent7: if the letter does not birdnest bravado the soupfin is a kind of a Curl. sent8: if the scanning is not a worthlessness that it is a Tyr and it is not unsold is not right. sent9: if something strands lahar it is not sold. sent10: the fact that the scanning is planktonic but it is not amoebic hold if there are comprehensible things. sent11: if something does not festoon cloaked but it is intradermal it is not an appointment. sent12: something does not tidy but it is not unactable if that it is monocarpic is not wrong. sent13: if the phenolphthalein is not interlinear and does birdnest bravado the letter does not birdnest bravado. sent14: if the scanning is a Tyr it strands lahar. sent15: if the fact that the scanning is both not a Tyr and not unsold does not hold that it strands lahar is true. sent16: if the scanning does strand lahar the slip is a mesh but it is not planktonic. sent17: the phenolphthalein is not interlinear but it birdnests bravado. sent18: that the scanning is not a Tyr and is not unsold is wrong if that it is not a worthlessness is not false. sent19: if a planktonic thing is non-amoebic then the fact that it is not a mesh is not right. sent20: if there is something such that the fact that it is a mesh is true the lakeside does mesh or strands lahar or both. sent21: something is comprehensible if that it is not comprehensible and it is conspecific is not right. sent22: the scanning is not a kind of a worthlessness and is a locative if the lakeside is monocarpic. sent23: the fact that the afterpiece is monocarpic hold if that the lakeside is a Tyr or it is not monocarpic or both is incorrect. sent24: the slip is not planktonic.
sent22 & sent1 -> int1: the scanning is not a kind of a worthlessness and is a locative.; int1 -> int2: the scanning is not a worthlessness.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the fact that the scanning is both not a Tyr and not unsold does not hold.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the scanning strands lahar.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the slip meshes and is not planktonic.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the slip is not a mesh.
$hypothesis$ = the slip meshes. ; $context$ = sent1: the lakeside is monocarpic. sent2: if something is unsold then the fact that it is a kind of a Tyr and/or it is not monocarpic is not true. sent3: if the soupfin is not a kind of an appointment that the slip is not comprehensible and not non-conspecific does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the soupfin is a kind of a Curl is not wrong the fact that it does not festoon cloaked and it is intradermal is not false. sent5: if that the scanning does not mesh and it is not a Tyr is wrong that it is planktonic is not false. sent6: the slip is monocarpic but not a mesh if the lakeside is a Tyr. sent7: if the letter does not birdnest bravado the soupfin is a kind of a Curl. sent8: if the scanning is not a worthlessness that it is a Tyr and it is not unsold is not right. sent9: if something strands lahar it is not sold. sent10: the fact that the scanning is planktonic but it is not amoebic hold if there are comprehensible things. sent11: if something does not festoon cloaked but it is intradermal it is not an appointment. sent12: something does not tidy but it is not unactable if that it is monocarpic is not wrong. sent13: if the phenolphthalein is not interlinear and does birdnest bravado the letter does not birdnest bravado. sent14: if the scanning is a Tyr it strands lahar. sent15: if the fact that the scanning is both not a Tyr and not unsold does not hold that it strands lahar is true. sent16: if the scanning does strand lahar the slip is a mesh but it is not planktonic. sent17: the phenolphthalein is not interlinear but it birdnests bravado. sent18: that the scanning is not a Tyr and is not unsold is wrong if that it is not a worthlessness is not false. sent19: if a planktonic thing is non-amoebic then the fact that it is not a mesh is not right. sent20: if there is something such that the fact that it is a mesh is true the lakeside does mesh or strands lahar or both. sent21: something is comprehensible if that it is not comprehensible and it is conspecific is not right. sent22: the scanning is not a kind of a worthlessness and is a locative if the lakeside is monocarpic. sent23: the fact that the afterpiece is monocarpic hold if that the lakeside is a Tyr or it is not monocarpic or both is incorrect. sent24: the slip is not planktonic. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent1 -> int1: the scanning is not a kind of a worthlessness and is a locative.; int1 -> int2: the scanning is not a worthlessness.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the fact that the scanning is both not a Tyr and not unsold does not hold.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the scanning strands lahar.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the slip meshes and is not planktonic.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__