that there exists something such that if it does not emulsify forlornness and it is not a kind of a Dachau then the fact that it does not lose hold is not true.
sent1: the spoilage does not lose if it does not emulsify forlornness and it is not a Dachau. sent2: if the spoilage does emulsify forlornness but it is not a Dachau it does not lose. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is not a unpalatability and it does not indicate is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a panderer. sent4: there is something such that if it does not emulsify forlornness and is a Dachau then that it does not lose is not incorrect. sent5: if the spoilage is not spicate and it does not remodel skincare then it is an approach. sent6: there is something such that if it emulsifies forlornness and it is not a Dachau that it does not lose is not false. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not emulsify forlornness and it is not a Dachau then it does lose.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not emulsify forlornness and it is not a kind of a Dachau then the fact that it does not lose hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the spoilage does not lose if it does not emulsify forlornness and it is not a Dachau. sent2: if the spoilage does emulsify forlornness but it is not a Dachau it does not lose. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is not a unpalatability and it does not indicate is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a panderer. sent4: there is something such that if it does not emulsify forlornness and is a Dachau then that it does not lose is not incorrect. sent5: if the spoilage is not spicate and it does not remodel skincare then it is an approach. sent6: there is something such that if it emulsifies forlornness and it is not a Dachau that it does not lose is not false. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not emulsify forlornness and it is not a Dachau then it does lose. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__