the saccule is not a Meropidae.
sent1: the saccule is not a Meropidae if there exists something such that it is a Parisian or not non-baboonish or both. sent2: that the aconite does not fudge Priacanthus is right if there is something such that it does govern fixed. sent3: if the fact that the dulcimer does not govern fixed and is not glacial is not correct the umbrellawort is not penumbral. sent4: the fact that the umbrellawort is not closed-circuit but it is a Parisian is not true if it is not baboonish. sent5: the Rh is not baboonish and it is not hyperbolic. sent6: the aconite is not Parisian. sent7: if something that is not a Meropidae is glacial then it is not statutory. sent8: that something headquarters bioremediation and/or it does fudge trailhead hold. sent9: the dulcimer is a kind of a Parisian and/or is closed-circuit if the neolith is not glacial. sent10: either the neolith is Parisian or it is baboonish or both if the fact that the umbrellawort is not penumbral is true. sent11: that something is a schwa and/or it governs aconite hold. sent12: the goniometer is not glacial. sent13: the aconite is statutory. sent14: the neolith is both not Parisian and not statutory. sent15: if something that does not govern fixed is not glacial then that it is not non-closed-circuit is not false. sent16: the fact that the dulcimer does not govern fixed and is a Meropidae is incorrect. sent17: if the aconite is statutory the dulcimer is not a troy and not a caragana. sent18: the fact that the umbrellawort is closed-circuit is not false if it is non-baboonish thing that is penumbral. sent19: the Siamese is not a caragana. sent20: something that is not a troy and is not a caragana is non-closed-circuit.
sent15 -> int1: the dulcimer is closed-circuit if it does not govern fixed and is not glacial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dulcimer does not govern fixed and is not glacial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dulcimer is closed-circuit.; sent20 -> int3: the dulcimer is not closed-circuit if it is both not a troy and not a caragana.; sent17 & sent13 -> int4: the dulcimer is not a troy and is not a caragana.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the dulcimer is not closed-circuit.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the dulcimer does not govern fixed and it is not glacial is wrong.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the umbrellawort is not penumbral.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the neolith is a Parisian and/or it is baboonish.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is either not non-Parisian or baboonish or both.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the saccule is a Meropidae.
$hypothesis$ = the saccule is not a Meropidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the saccule is not a Meropidae if there exists something such that it is a Parisian or not non-baboonish or both. sent2: that the aconite does not fudge Priacanthus is right if there is something such that it does govern fixed. sent3: if the fact that the dulcimer does not govern fixed and is not glacial is not correct the umbrellawort is not penumbral. sent4: the fact that the umbrellawort is not closed-circuit but it is a Parisian is not true if it is not baboonish. sent5: the Rh is not baboonish and it is not hyperbolic. sent6: the aconite is not Parisian. sent7: if something that is not a Meropidae is glacial then it is not statutory. sent8: that something headquarters bioremediation and/or it does fudge trailhead hold. sent9: the dulcimer is a kind of a Parisian and/or is closed-circuit if the neolith is not glacial. sent10: either the neolith is Parisian or it is baboonish or both if the fact that the umbrellawort is not penumbral is true. sent11: that something is a schwa and/or it governs aconite hold. sent12: the goniometer is not glacial. sent13: the aconite is statutory. sent14: the neolith is both not Parisian and not statutory. sent15: if something that does not govern fixed is not glacial then that it is not non-closed-circuit is not false. sent16: the fact that the dulcimer does not govern fixed and is a Meropidae is incorrect. sent17: if the aconite is statutory the dulcimer is not a troy and not a caragana. sent18: the fact that the umbrellawort is closed-circuit is not false if it is non-baboonish thing that is penumbral. sent19: the Siamese is not a caragana. sent20: something that is not a troy and is not a caragana is non-closed-circuit. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the dulcimer is closed-circuit if it does not govern fixed and is not glacial.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dulcimer does not govern fixed and is not glacial.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the dulcimer is closed-circuit.; sent20 -> int3: the dulcimer is not closed-circuit if it is both not a troy and not a caragana.; sent17 & sent13 -> int4: the dulcimer is not a troy and is not a caragana.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the dulcimer is not closed-circuit.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the dulcimer does not govern fixed and it is not glacial is wrong.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the umbrellawort is not penumbral.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the neolith is a Parisian and/or it is baboonish.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is either not non-Parisian or baboonish or both.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__