the fact that if the removableness happens then the endocrine does not occur is not right.
sent1: the subclavianness does not occur. sent2: if the abnegation happens then the removableness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that both the abnegation and the non-removableness occurs does not hold the abnegation does not occur. sent4: the NMR does not occur. sent5: that the baboonishness happens is not incorrect if the fact that the perambulation occurs is not false. sent6: the rotating khan does not occur. sent7: the lap happens and/or the diligence happens. sent8: the binocularness triggers that the denunciation occurs. sent9: the uninfluentialness happens if the fudging happens. sent10: if the fact that the endocrineness occurs and the resultant happens is false the resultant does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the abnegation and the irremovableness occurs does not hold if the debarkation happens. sent12: the endocrineness happens if the removableness happens. sent13: if either the abnegation happens or the denunciation happens or both the removableness occurs. sent14: the ranching leads to that the interstitialness happens. sent15: the fact that the barter or the Wake or both occurs is not false. sent16: the Tobagonian does not occur. sent17: that the endocrine and the resultant occurs is not right if that the binocularness does not occur is not false. sent18: the binocularness occurs if the endocrineness happens. sent19: the rotating aquatics happens. sent20: if the abnegation and/or the denunciation happens the removableness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the removableness occurs is right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the endocrine occurs hold.; sent18 & assump2 -> int1: the binocularness happens.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the denunciation occurs.; int2 -> int3: the abnegation happens and/or the denunciation happens.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the removableness does not occur is right.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the endocrineness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the resultant does not occur is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the removableness happens then the endocrine does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the subclavianness does not occur. sent2: if the abnegation happens then the removableness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that both the abnegation and the non-removableness occurs does not hold the abnegation does not occur. sent4: the NMR does not occur. sent5: that the baboonishness happens is not incorrect if the fact that the perambulation occurs is not false. sent6: the rotating khan does not occur. sent7: the lap happens and/or the diligence happens. sent8: the binocularness triggers that the denunciation occurs. sent9: the uninfluentialness happens if the fudging happens. sent10: if the fact that the endocrineness occurs and the resultant happens is false the resultant does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the abnegation and the irremovableness occurs does not hold if the debarkation happens. sent12: the endocrineness happens if the removableness happens. sent13: if either the abnegation happens or the denunciation happens or both the removableness occurs. sent14: the ranching leads to that the interstitialness happens. sent15: the fact that the barter or the Wake or both occurs is not false. sent16: the Tobagonian does not occur. sent17: that the endocrine and the resultant occurs is not right if that the binocularness does not occur is not false. sent18: the binocularness occurs if the endocrineness happens. sent19: the rotating aquatics happens. sent20: if the abnegation and/or the denunciation happens the removableness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the removableness occurs is right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the endocrine occurs hold.; sent18 & assump2 -> int1: the binocularness happens.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the denunciation occurs.; int2 -> int3: the abnegation happens and/or the denunciation happens.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the removableness does not occur is right.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the endocrineness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__