the fact that if the offloading happens the noncombustibleness occurs is not true.
sent1: if the noncombustibleness does not occur then the rap does not occur and the homily does not occur. sent2: the non-apneicness leads to that the beeping fighter does not occur and the ankylosing does not occur. sent3: if the corresponding does not occur and the diverging does not occur the offloading does not occur. sent4: the ablactation does not occur and the apneicness does not occur. sent5: the vitiliginousness occurs and the folding idealism happens if the predestinarianness does not occur. sent6: the counterbombardment occurs if the beeping psephology occurs. sent7: if the vitiliginousness occurs then the yoga does not occur but the beeping psephology occurs. sent8: that the actinicness does not occur and the folding Cambridge does not occur is caused by that the ankylosing does not occur. sent9: the noncombustibleness occurs if the fact that the corresponding does not occur and the diverging does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the folding Cambridge does not occur then the predestinarianness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the folding Incarnation but not the offloading happens is incorrect then the noncombustibleness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the folding Incarnation but not the offloading occurs is incorrect if the counterbombardment happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the offloading happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the corresponding does not occur and the diverging does not occur.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the offloading does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the corresponding does not occur and the diverging does not occur is not true.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the noncombustibleness occurs is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the rapping does not occur and the homily does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the offloading happens the noncombustibleness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the noncombustibleness does not occur then the rap does not occur and the homily does not occur. sent2: the non-apneicness leads to that the beeping fighter does not occur and the ankylosing does not occur. sent3: if the corresponding does not occur and the diverging does not occur the offloading does not occur. sent4: the ablactation does not occur and the apneicness does not occur. sent5: the vitiliginousness occurs and the folding idealism happens if the predestinarianness does not occur. sent6: the counterbombardment occurs if the beeping psephology occurs. sent7: if the vitiliginousness occurs then the yoga does not occur but the beeping psephology occurs. sent8: that the actinicness does not occur and the folding Cambridge does not occur is caused by that the ankylosing does not occur. sent9: the noncombustibleness occurs if the fact that the corresponding does not occur and the diverging does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the folding Cambridge does not occur then the predestinarianness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the folding Incarnation but not the offloading happens is incorrect then the noncombustibleness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the folding Incarnation but not the offloading occurs is incorrect if the counterbombardment happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the offloading happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the corresponding does not occur and the diverging does not occur.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the offloading does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the corresponding does not occur and the diverging does not occur is not true.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the noncombustibleness occurs is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__