that the insemination does not occur and the Texanness does not occur yields that the roar does not occur.
sent1: if the animalisticness does not occur the fact that the insemination does not occur and the Texanness happens is false. sent2: the attributableness occurs. sent3: the fact that the roar happens if the insemination does not occur and the Texan does not occur is not wrong. sent4: if the insemination and the non-Texanness occurs the roar does not occur. sent5: the acceptiveness happens. sent6: that the fact that the insemination does not occur but the Texan happens does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the hyping Champaign occurs. sent8: that the roaring happens is prevented by that not the insemination but the Texan happens. sent9: that the insemination but not the Texanness happens is wrong. sent10: the non-agrypnoticness yields that both the faro and the acceptiveness happens. sent11: the fact that the insemination does not occur and the Texan does not occur is not correct if the fact that the animalisticness does not occur is correct. sent12: the fact that both the acceptiveness and the agrypnoticness happens is right. sent13: that the insemination occurs but the Texan does not occur is false if the animalisticness does not occur. sent14: if the animalisticness does not occur the insemination does not occur and the Texan does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the insemination does not occur and the Texanness does not occur is true.; sent12 -> int1: the agrypnoticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the roaring happens is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the agrypnoticness and the roaring happens.;
the faro occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the insemination does not occur and the Texanness does not occur yields that the roar does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the animalisticness does not occur the fact that the insemination does not occur and the Texanness happens is false. sent2: the attributableness occurs. sent3: the fact that the roar happens if the insemination does not occur and the Texan does not occur is not wrong. sent4: if the insemination and the non-Texanness occurs the roar does not occur. sent5: the acceptiveness happens. sent6: that the fact that the insemination does not occur but the Texan happens does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the hyping Champaign occurs. sent8: that the roaring happens is prevented by that not the insemination but the Texan happens. sent9: that the insemination but not the Texanness happens is wrong. sent10: the non-agrypnoticness yields that both the faro and the acceptiveness happens. sent11: the fact that the insemination does not occur and the Texan does not occur is not correct if the fact that the animalisticness does not occur is correct. sent12: the fact that both the acceptiveness and the agrypnoticness happens is right. sent13: that the insemination occurs but the Texan does not occur is false if the animalisticness does not occur. sent14: if the animalisticness does not occur the insemination does not occur and the Texan does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the insemination does not occur and the Texanness does not occur is true.; sent12 -> int1: the agrypnoticness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the roaring happens is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the agrypnoticness and the roaring happens.; __UNKNOWN__