the claret is not Piagetian.
sent1: if the claret is a TMV then it is a kind of a drawl. sent2: if the malt does not joint the plank does knot malt. sent3: the claret is a kind of an angle if it is Piagetian. sent4: if the plank does knot malt then that it is a joint is correct. sent5: if the claret is solanaceous it does wax. sent6: the malt is not non-oleophilic if it is achenial. sent7: the claret is not Piagetian or it is not humane or both. sent8: the malt is non-oleophilic if the plank does blinker balboa and does angle. sent9: if the plank is not oleophilic then the malt is joint. sent10: the fact that the plank is achenial is not incorrect if it does blinker balboa. sent11: the ranter does drawl. sent12: if the malt does drawl it does knot malt. sent13: if the claret is Piagetian it does blinker balboa. sent14: the malt is achenial if the plank is not humane. sent15: something that is not achenial is not non-Piagetian but joint. sent16: the malt drawls if it is oleophilic. sent17: the malt angles. sent18: if something is not achenial then it is not a drawl and/or it is not humane. sent19: the malt blinkers balboa. sent20: the plank is not a kind of an angle if the malt does drawl and it does blinker balboa. sent21: the plank is tasty. sent22: the malt is humane if the fact that the plank does not knot malt is correct. sent23: the lap cats and it is oleophilic. sent24: the plank is not a joint. sent25: the malt is achenial if the plank does not blinker balboa. sent26: if the claret queues tipper it is a kind of a planthopper. sent27: if the malt does knot malt and it angles the claret is not Piagetian.
the claret is Piagetian.
sent15 -> int1: if the claret is not achenial then it is Piagetian and is not non-joint.;
$hypothesis$ = the claret is not Piagetian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the claret is a TMV then it is a kind of a drawl. sent2: if the malt does not joint the plank does knot malt. sent3: the claret is a kind of an angle if it is Piagetian. sent4: if the plank does knot malt then that it is a joint is correct. sent5: if the claret is solanaceous it does wax. sent6: the malt is not non-oleophilic if it is achenial. sent7: the claret is not Piagetian or it is not humane or both. sent8: the malt is non-oleophilic if the plank does blinker balboa and does angle. sent9: if the plank is not oleophilic then the malt is joint. sent10: the fact that the plank is achenial is not incorrect if it does blinker balboa. sent11: the ranter does drawl. sent12: if the malt does drawl it does knot malt. sent13: if the claret is Piagetian it does blinker balboa. sent14: the malt is achenial if the plank is not humane. sent15: something that is not achenial is not non-Piagetian but joint. sent16: the malt drawls if it is oleophilic. sent17: the malt angles. sent18: if something is not achenial then it is not a drawl and/or it is not humane. sent19: the malt blinkers balboa. sent20: the plank is not a kind of an angle if the malt does drawl and it does blinker balboa. sent21: the plank is tasty. sent22: the malt is humane if the fact that the plank does not knot malt is correct. sent23: the lap cats and it is oleophilic. sent24: the plank is not a joint. sent25: the malt is achenial if the plank does not blinker balboa. sent26: if the claret queues tipper it is a kind of a planthopper. sent27: if the malt does knot malt and it angles the claret is not Piagetian. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__