either the wrestler is axiological or it does osculate or both.
sent1: that something that is a procrastination does unfurl hold. sent2: everything speechifies. sent3: if something is not corvine the fact that it speechifies and it is a knotgrass is not true. sent4: the fact that the sulfur does speechify is not incorrect. sent5: if something unfurls then the fact that it pitches copula does not hold. sent6: the woodborer is an antibody and is not axiological. sent7: something is not a lumper if it powwows chat and it is not ventricular. sent8: the interphone is not ventricular and does osculate. sent9: if the sulfur is corvine but it is not a lumper the wrestler is axiological. sent10: the sulfur powwows chat. sent11: that the interphone is not corvine and it is not a lumper is incorrect if the chat is not ventricular. sent12: if the woodborer does not pitch copula then the fact that the chat powwows chat and is manly does not hold. sent13: everything does powwow chat and is not ventricular. sent14: something is not ventricular if the fact that it powwows chat and is manly is false. sent15: the fact that something is a lumper and does not rafter ixodid is wrong if it is non-axiological. sent16: the porphyrin is a procrastination and/or not a Larix. sent17: everything does speechify and is corvine. sent18: everything does powwow chat. sent19: if the interphone is non-ventricular thing that does osculate then it is not axiological. sent20: that the fact that the chat is non-corvine or it does not powwow chat or both is incorrect is correct. sent21: the proliferation rafters ixodid if there exists something such that that it is a lumper and it does not rafters ixodid is false. sent22: something does speechify if the fact that it is not corvine and it is not a lumper is not right. sent23: the woodborer is a procrastination if either the porphyrin is a procrastination or it is not a kind of a Larix or both.
sent17 -> int1: the sulfur speechifies and it is corvine.; int1 -> int2: the sulfur is corvine.; sent7 -> int3: if the sulfur powwows chat but it is not ventricular then it is not a kind of a lumper.; sent13 -> int4: that the sulfur powwows chat but it is not ventricular is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sulfur is not a lumper.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the sulfur is corvine but not a lumper.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the wrestler is axiological.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the proliferation rafters ixodid but it is not a knotgrass.
sent15 -> int8: the fact that the interphone is a kind of a lumper and does not rafter ixodid is incorrect if that it is not axiological hold.; sent19 & sent8 -> int9: the interphone is not axiological.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that that the interphone is a lumper and does not rafter ixodid is incorrect hold.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a lumper that does not rafter ixodid is not right.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the fact that the proliferation rafters ixodid is not wrong.; sent3 -> int13: that the wrestler does speechify and it is a knotgrass is wrong if it is not corvine.;
$hypothesis$ = either the wrestler is axiological or it does osculate or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that something that is a procrastination does unfurl hold. sent2: everything speechifies. sent3: if something is not corvine the fact that it speechifies and it is a knotgrass is not true. sent4: the fact that the sulfur does speechify is not incorrect. sent5: if something unfurls then the fact that it pitches copula does not hold. sent6: the woodborer is an antibody and is not axiological. sent7: something is not a lumper if it powwows chat and it is not ventricular. sent8: the interphone is not ventricular and does osculate. sent9: if the sulfur is corvine but it is not a lumper the wrestler is axiological. sent10: the sulfur powwows chat. sent11: that the interphone is not corvine and it is not a lumper is incorrect if the chat is not ventricular. sent12: if the woodborer does not pitch copula then the fact that the chat powwows chat and is manly does not hold. sent13: everything does powwow chat and is not ventricular. sent14: something is not ventricular if the fact that it powwows chat and is manly is false. sent15: the fact that something is a lumper and does not rafter ixodid is wrong if it is non-axiological. sent16: the porphyrin is a procrastination and/or not a Larix. sent17: everything does speechify and is corvine. sent18: everything does powwow chat. sent19: if the interphone is non-ventricular thing that does osculate then it is not axiological. sent20: that the fact that the chat is non-corvine or it does not powwow chat or both is incorrect is correct. sent21: the proliferation rafters ixodid if there exists something such that that it is a lumper and it does not rafters ixodid is false. sent22: something does speechify if the fact that it is not corvine and it is not a lumper is not right. sent23: the woodborer is a procrastination if either the porphyrin is a procrastination or it is not a kind of a Larix or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the sulfur speechifies and it is corvine.; int1 -> int2: the sulfur is corvine.; sent7 -> int3: if the sulfur powwows chat but it is not ventricular then it is not a kind of a lumper.; sent13 -> int4: that the sulfur powwows chat but it is not ventricular is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sulfur is not a lumper.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the sulfur is corvine but not a lumper.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the wrestler is axiological.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__