the rockery is not hieroglyphic.
sent1: the tree-frog draws and it is not careful. sent2: the fact that the cookstove is a visitor is right if that the quickener solidifies but it is not homologous is not right. sent3: if the diaphragm is a kind of a visitor then it benefits. sent4: that the fact that the racket is a kind of reticulate thing that does draw is true does not hold if the tree-frog is not reticulate. sent5: the churn is not non-greenhouse if the cookstove is a visitor. sent6: if the quickener is not pro-life and does visa racket then it does not solidify. sent7: the rockery is not hieroglyphic if the housewrecker is a visitor that does solidify. sent8: if the churn is reticulate and it solidifies then it is not greenhouse. sent9: that the rockery is pro-life is not wrong. sent10: if the churn draws and is homologous the quickener is not a greenhouse. sent11: the rockery is feverish. sent12: the housewrecker does not solidify if it is not feverish and it is pro-life. sent13: that the racket does not visa racket is right if the churn is greenhouse and it draws. sent14: if the racket does not visa racket and is not reticulate then the rockery is hieroglyphic. sent15: the housewrecker is non-feverish thing that is pro-life. sent16: the tree-frog is not pro-life. sent17: the quickener is not a kind of a greenhouse. sent18: if the churn draws and it is a kind of a visitor the housewrecker is not pro-life. sent19: the racket is not reticulate. sent20: the fact that a visitor is not hieroglyphic is not incorrect. sent21: the housewrecker is a greenhouse and it greases fineness. sent22: that the housewrecker does draw and does not solidify is wrong if the tree-frog is not a kind of a draw. sent23: if the tree-frog is a drawing then the churn is a drawing. sent24: the housewrecker is not a drawing but it is pro-life. sent25: the fact that the quickener does not visa racket hold. sent26: the fact that the housewrecker is pro-life is correct. sent27: if the housewrecker does not solidify then the fact that the fact that the quickener solidify but it is not homologous hold does not hold.
sent12 & sent15 -> int1: the housewrecker does not solidify.; int1 & sent27 -> int2: that the quickener does solidify and is not homologous does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the cookstove is a visitor.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the churn is greenhouse.; sent1 -> int5: the tree-frog is a kind of a drawing.; sent23 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the churn is a drawing is right.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the churn is greenhouse and a drawing.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the racket does not visa racket.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the racket does not visa racket and is not reticulate.; int9 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the rockery is not hieroglyphic.
$hypothesis$ = the rockery is not hieroglyphic. ; $context$ = sent1: the tree-frog draws and it is not careful. sent2: the fact that the cookstove is a visitor is right if that the quickener solidifies but it is not homologous is not right. sent3: if the diaphragm is a kind of a visitor then it benefits. sent4: that the fact that the racket is a kind of reticulate thing that does draw is true does not hold if the tree-frog is not reticulate. sent5: the churn is not non-greenhouse if the cookstove is a visitor. sent6: if the quickener is not pro-life and does visa racket then it does not solidify. sent7: the rockery is not hieroglyphic if the housewrecker is a visitor that does solidify. sent8: if the churn is reticulate and it solidifies then it is not greenhouse. sent9: that the rockery is pro-life is not wrong. sent10: if the churn draws and is homologous the quickener is not a greenhouse. sent11: the rockery is feverish. sent12: the housewrecker does not solidify if it is not feverish and it is pro-life. sent13: that the racket does not visa racket is right if the churn is greenhouse and it draws. sent14: if the racket does not visa racket and is not reticulate then the rockery is hieroglyphic. sent15: the housewrecker is non-feverish thing that is pro-life. sent16: the tree-frog is not pro-life. sent17: the quickener is not a kind of a greenhouse. sent18: if the churn draws and it is a kind of a visitor the housewrecker is not pro-life. sent19: the racket is not reticulate. sent20: the fact that a visitor is not hieroglyphic is not incorrect. sent21: the housewrecker is a greenhouse and it greases fineness. sent22: that the housewrecker does draw and does not solidify is wrong if the tree-frog is not a kind of a draw. sent23: if the tree-frog is a drawing then the churn is a drawing. sent24: the housewrecker is not a drawing but it is pro-life. sent25: the fact that the quickener does not visa racket hold. sent26: the fact that the housewrecker is pro-life is correct. sent27: if the housewrecker does not solidify then the fact that the fact that the quickener solidify but it is not homologous hold does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent15 -> int1: the housewrecker does not solidify.; int1 & sent27 -> int2: that the quickener does solidify and is not homologous does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the cookstove is a visitor.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the churn is greenhouse.; sent1 -> int5: the tree-frog is a kind of a drawing.; sent23 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the churn is a drawing is right.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the churn is greenhouse and a drawing.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the racket does not visa racket.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the racket does not visa racket and is not reticulate.; int9 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__