that the HCG is non-caruncular and is microsomal is not correct if the Ball does expense prehensor.
sent1: that the HCG is caruncular and is microsomal is not right if the Ball expenses prehensor. sent2: the twinflower is adaptive and it does brine. sent3: the fact that the HCG is not adaptive is not wrong. sent4: if the Ball does expense prehensor then the HCG is non-caruncular thing that is microsomal. sent5: the fact that the HCG is not caruncular but it is microsomal hold. sent6: if the mover is not caruncular then the HCG is not caruncular but it is microsomal. sent7: the HCG is not existent. sent8: the fact that the Ball is not caruncular and expenses prehensor is not true. sent9: the Ball skitters if that the hibachi is not a lowercase but adaptive does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the Ball is lowercase hold then the fact that the hibachi does not expense prehensor and skitters is not right. sent11: that the HCG is caruncular and it is microsomal is wrong if the mover is not caruncular. sent12: that the Ball is not microsomal and skitters is not true if the HCG is caruncular. sent13: the fact that the Ball does skitter is true if the hibachi is lowercase. sent14: the mover skitters. sent15: that the HCG is both non-caruncular and not non-microsomal does not hold if the mover is non-caruncular. sent16: the fact that the HCG is caruncular and is microsomal does not hold. sent17: the fact that the hibachi is a kind of a lowercase and it is adaptive is false. sent18: the fact that the hibachi is both not a lowercase and adaptive is not right. sent19: if the Ball is caruncular then the fact that the mover is a kind of non-microsomal thing that expenses prehensor is not correct. sent20: if the fact that something is not adaptive and does skitter is incorrect then it is adaptive. sent21: the mover is not caruncular if the Ball skitters and it does expense prehensor.
sent9 & sent18 -> int1: the Ball skitters.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ball does expense prehensor.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Ball does skitter and it expenses prehensor.; sent21 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mover is not caruncular is not incorrect.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the HCG is not caruncular but it is microsomal is not right.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the cascade is adaptive.
sent20 -> int5: the cascade is adaptive if the fact that that it is not adaptive and it skitters is right is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the HCG is non-caruncular and is microsomal is not correct if the Ball does expense prehensor. ; $context$ = sent1: that the HCG is caruncular and is microsomal is not right if the Ball expenses prehensor. sent2: the twinflower is adaptive and it does brine. sent3: the fact that the HCG is not adaptive is not wrong. sent4: if the Ball does expense prehensor then the HCG is non-caruncular thing that is microsomal. sent5: the fact that the HCG is not caruncular but it is microsomal hold. sent6: if the mover is not caruncular then the HCG is not caruncular but it is microsomal. sent7: the HCG is not existent. sent8: the fact that the Ball is not caruncular and expenses prehensor is not true. sent9: the Ball skitters if that the hibachi is not a lowercase but adaptive does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the Ball is lowercase hold then the fact that the hibachi does not expense prehensor and skitters is not right. sent11: that the HCG is caruncular and it is microsomal is wrong if the mover is not caruncular. sent12: that the Ball is not microsomal and skitters is not true if the HCG is caruncular. sent13: the fact that the Ball does skitter is true if the hibachi is lowercase. sent14: the mover skitters. sent15: that the HCG is both non-caruncular and not non-microsomal does not hold if the mover is non-caruncular. sent16: the fact that the HCG is caruncular and is microsomal does not hold. sent17: the fact that the hibachi is a kind of a lowercase and it is adaptive is false. sent18: the fact that the hibachi is both not a lowercase and adaptive is not right. sent19: if the Ball is caruncular then the fact that the mover is a kind of non-microsomal thing that expenses prehensor is not correct. sent20: if the fact that something is not adaptive and does skitter is incorrect then it is adaptive. sent21: the mover is not caruncular if the Ball skitters and it does expense prehensor. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent18 -> int1: the Ball skitters.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ball does expense prehensor.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Ball does skitter and it expenses prehensor.; sent21 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mover is not caruncular is not incorrect.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the HCG is not caruncular but it is microsomal is not right.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__