the fact that if the achieving happens then the fact that the undemonstrativeness does not occur is not false is not right.
sent1: if the differentialness does not occur then that the hajj does not occur or the nonimitativeness does not occur or both does not hold. sent2: that the non-cosmicness and the incorruptness happens brings about that the anaphoricness occurs. sent3: that the undemonstrativeness happens is prevented by that the anaphoricness happens and the achieving happens. sent4: the differential does not occur. sent5: that the inflammation happens is prevented by that the non-cosmicness and the honorableness occurs. sent6: the corrupting does not occur. sent7: that the pawing occurs is prevented by that the pool happens. sent8: the non-professorialness and/or the gentling occurs. sent9: both the non-cosmicness and the non-corruptness happens if the dishonorableness does not occur. sent10: the dishonorableness results in that the hajj does not occur or the nonimitativeness does not occur or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dishonorableness happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the hajj does not occur and/or the nonimitativeness does not occur.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: that the hajj does not occur and/or the nonimitativeness does not occur is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dishonorableness does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: both the non-cosmicness and the non-corruptness occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the anaphoricness occurs is not incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the achieving happens.; int6 & assump2 -> int7: both the anaphoricness and the achieving happens.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the undemonstrativeness does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the inflammation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the achieving happens then the fact that the undemonstrativeness does not occur is not false is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the differentialness does not occur then that the hajj does not occur or the nonimitativeness does not occur or both does not hold. sent2: that the non-cosmicness and the incorruptness happens brings about that the anaphoricness occurs. sent3: that the undemonstrativeness happens is prevented by that the anaphoricness happens and the achieving happens. sent4: the differential does not occur. sent5: that the inflammation happens is prevented by that the non-cosmicness and the honorableness occurs. sent6: the corrupting does not occur. sent7: that the pawing occurs is prevented by that the pool happens. sent8: the non-professorialness and/or the gentling occurs. sent9: both the non-cosmicness and the non-corruptness happens if the dishonorableness does not occur. sent10: the dishonorableness results in that the hajj does not occur or the nonimitativeness does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dishonorableness happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the hajj does not occur and/or the nonimitativeness does not occur.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: that the hajj does not occur and/or the nonimitativeness does not occur is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dishonorableness does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: both the non-cosmicness and the non-corruptness occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the anaphoricness occurs is not incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the achieving happens.; int6 & assump2 -> int7: both the anaphoricness and the achieving happens.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the undemonstrativeness does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__