there exists something such that if it is not pyrolytic and/or it is not a regular then the fact that it does not forecast orris is correct.
sent1: the advocate is not pyretic if it is not uncritical or does not compensate Othello or both. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a Geraint and/or it does not estivate then it does not mortice blotter. sent3: there exists something such that if it is pyrolytic or it is not regular or both it does not forecast orris. sent4: the advocate does not forecast orris if it either is not pyrolytic or is not a regular or both. sent5: if the advocate is not pyrolytic then it does not forecast orris. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a cryogen and/or it is not a sexpot then it is not unobvious. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not pyrolytic or it is not regular or both then it forecasts orris. sent8: if the advocate either is not pyrolytic or is irregular or both it forecasts orris. sent9: the advocate does not forecast divertimento if the fact that it is not pyrolytic and/or it is non-innocuous is not incorrect. sent10: the advocate does not forecast orris if it is not pyrolytic or a regular or both. sent11: if something does not forecast hindbrain or it is not germfree or both it does not compensate disconnection. sent12: there is something such that if it is not regular then it does not forecast orris. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a fatalist and/or it is not a thistledown it does not forecast stamper. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not pyrolytic and/or it is regular it does not forecast orris. sent15: if the advocate is not a bluegrass and/or it is not pyrolytic it does not crust fictionalization. sent16: there is something such that if it is not pyrolytic it does not forecast orris. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a latten or not a Bellarmine or both then it does not compensate leflunomide.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not forecast hindbrain and/or is not germfree then it does not compensate disconnection.
sent11 -> int1: the hydroxychloroquine does not compensate disconnection if it does not forecast hindbrain or it is non-germfree or both.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not pyrolytic and/or it is not a regular then the fact that it does not forecast orris is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the advocate is not pyretic if it is not uncritical or does not compensate Othello or both. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a Geraint and/or it does not estivate then it does not mortice blotter. sent3: there exists something such that if it is pyrolytic or it is not regular or both it does not forecast orris. sent4: the advocate does not forecast orris if it either is not pyrolytic or is not a regular or both. sent5: if the advocate is not pyrolytic then it does not forecast orris. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a cryogen and/or it is not a sexpot then it is not unobvious. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not pyrolytic or it is not regular or both then it forecasts orris. sent8: if the advocate either is not pyrolytic or is irregular or both it forecasts orris. sent9: the advocate does not forecast divertimento if the fact that it is not pyrolytic and/or it is non-innocuous is not incorrect. sent10: the advocate does not forecast orris if it is not pyrolytic or a regular or both. sent11: if something does not forecast hindbrain or it is not germfree or both it does not compensate disconnection. sent12: there is something such that if it is not regular then it does not forecast orris. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a fatalist and/or it is not a thistledown it does not forecast stamper. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not pyrolytic and/or it is regular it does not forecast orris. sent15: if the advocate is not a bluegrass and/or it is not pyrolytic it does not crust fictionalization. sent16: there is something such that if it is not pyrolytic it does not forecast orris. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a latten or not a Bellarmine or both then it does not compensate leflunomide. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__