the hookworm is a amberbell and unidirectional if the rail does not sermonize sizzle.
sent1: the sewage does cloister hole-in-the-wall if the rail does not stoke crowbait. sent2: if the sewage is not unidirectional then the hookworm is both a amberbell and unidirectional. sent3: if that the rail cloisters hole-in-the-wall and is an incontinence is not true then it does not cloister meson. sent4: the reporter does stretch stele or it stokes Tomistoma or both. sent5: if the rail does not sermonize sizzle and/or stokes crowbait it does not sermonize phoneme. sent6: the tardigrade is not unidirectional. sent7: something does not sermonize sizzle and is not unidirectional if it does not stoke crowbait. sent8: The fact that the hole-in-the-wall does not cloister rail is true. sent9: the hookworm does not sermonize funicular. sent10: the sewage is not an incontinence if something does not sermonize phoneme and does not cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent11: if the hookworm is not a kind of a amberbell and/or cloisters hole-in-the-wall then it does not sermonize sizzle. sent12: the hostel is unidirectional. sent13: the rail is not unidirectional. sent14: if that the hookworm is a kind of a amberbell but it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall is false it does cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent15: the fact that the sewage is an incontinence and does not sermonize phoneme is wrong if there is something such that it does cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent16: that the hookworm is a amberbell but it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall is not true. sent17: the fact that the hookworm is not an incompetent is correct. sent18: the kylie does not sermonize phoneme. sent19: that the rail is not unidirectional is true if something that does not sermonize phoneme does not cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent20: that the rail is not a amberbell is not right if the hookworm does not cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent21: the fact that the rail does not cloister hole-in-the-wall is true. sent22: the gofer is not a siderocyte or it sermonizes phoneme or both. sent23: there is something such that that it sermonizes phoneme and it is not unidirectional hold. sent24: there is something such that it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rail does not sermonize sizzle.; assump1 -> int1: that the rail does not sermonize sizzle and/or it does stoke crowbait hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the rail does not sermonize phoneme.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the rail does not sermonize phoneme and it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does not sermonize phoneme and it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the sewage is not an incontinence.;
the projector is not unidirectional.
sent7 -> int6: the projector does not sermonize sizzle and it is non-unidirectional if it does not stoke crowbait.; sent14 & sent16 -> int7: the hookworm cloisters hole-in-the-wall.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it cloisters hole-in-the-wall hold.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the fact that the sewage is an incontinence but it does not sermonize phoneme is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the hookworm is a amberbell and unidirectional if the rail does not sermonize sizzle. ; $context$ = sent1: the sewage does cloister hole-in-the-wall if the rail does not stoke crowbait. sent2: if the sewage is not unidirectional then the hookworm is both a amberbell and unidirectional. sent3: if that the rail cloisters hole-in-the-wall and is an incontinence is not true then it does not cloister meson. sent4: the reporter does stretch stele or it stokes Tomistoma or both. sent5: if the rail does not sermonize sizzle and/or stokes crowbait it does not sermonize phoneme. sent6: the tardigrade is not unidirectional. sent7: something does not sermonize sizzle and is not unidirectional if it does not stoke crowbait. sent8: The fact that the hole-in-the-wall does not cloister rail is true. sent9: the hookworm does not sermonize funicular. sent10: the sewage is not an incontinence if something does not sermonize phoneme and does not cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent11: if the hookworm is not a kind of a amberbell and/or cloisters hole-in-the-wall then it does not sermonize sizzle. sent12: the hostel is unidirectional. sent13: the rail is not unidirectional. sent14: if that the hookworm is a kind of a amberbell but it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall is false it does cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent15: the fact that the sewage is an incontinence and does not sermonize phoneme is wrong if there is something such that it does cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent16: that the hookworm is a amberbell but it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall is not true. sent17: the fact that the hookworm is not an incompetent is correct. sent18: the kylie does not sermonize phoneme. sent19: that the rail is not unidirectional is true if something that does not sermonize phoneme does not cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent20: that the rail is not a amberbell is not right if the hookworm does not cloister hole-in-the-wall. sent21: the fact that the rail does not cloister hole-in-the-wall is true. sent22: the gofer is not a siderocyte or it sermonizes phoneme or both. sent23: there is something such that that it sermonizes phoneme and it is not unidirectional hold. sent24: there is something such that it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rail does not sermonize sizzle.; assump1 -> int1: that the rail does not sermonize sizzle and/or it does stoke crowbait hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the rail does not sermonize phoneme.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the rail does not sermonize phoneme and it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does not sermonize phoneme and it does not cloister hole-in-the-wall.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the sewage is not an incontinence.; __UNKNOWN__