the gravel does not occur.
sent1: that the ectopicness and the nonspecificness occurs does not hold. sent2: the juicelessness does not occur if the ectopicness happens. sent3: that the juicelessness happens but the Zambianness does not occur is not correct. sent4: the unpublishableness and the honeying bathroom occurs if the lashing does not occur. sent5: the fact that the honeying Melanoplus does not occur and the convecting does not occur is false. sent6: if that not the ectopicness but the nonspecificness happens is incorrect then the juicelessness does not occur. sent7: if the lash does not occur the honeying bathroom happens. sent8: if both the resettling eminence and the unpublishableness happens the gravel does not occur. sent9: the lash does not occur. sent10: if the dehiscence does not occur then the gravelling occurs. sent11: the nonspecificness prevents that the dehiscence does not occur. sent12: the honeying bathroom occurs. sent13: the ectopicness does not occur. sent14: the fact that the non-juicelessness and the non-Zambianness occurs does not hold. sent15: the juicelessness happens if the fact that both the non-juicelessness and the non-Zambianness happens does not hold. sent16: the resettling eminence happens if the dehiscence occurs. sent17: that the football does not occur and the resettling serosa does not occur does not hold. sent18: that both the lash and the unpublishableness happens is false if the Zambian does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the honeying bathroom and the resettling eminence occurs does not hold the resettling eminence does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that both the non-ectopicness and the nonspecificness happens does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the juicelessness does not occur.; sent15 & sent14 -> int2: the juicelessness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: both the non-ectopicness and the nonspecificness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the nonspecificness occurs.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the dehiscence happens.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the resettling eminence happens.; sent4 & sent9 -> int8: the unpublishableness occurs and the honeying bathroom happens.; int8 -> int9: that the unpublishableness occurs is not incorrect.; int7 & int9 -> int10: both the resettling eminence and the unpublishableness happens.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the gravelling happens.
$hypothesis$ = the gravel does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the ectopicness and the nonspecificness occurs does not hold. sent2: the juicelessness does not occur if the ectopicness happens. sent3: that the juicelessness happens but the Zambianness does not occur is not correct. sent4: the unpublishableness and the honeying bathroom occurs if the lashing does not occur. sent5: the fact that the honeying Melanoplus does not occur and the convecting does not occur is false. sent6: if that not the ectopicness but the nonspecificness happens is incorrect then the juicelessness does not occur. sent7: if the lash does not occur the honeying bathroom happens. sent8: if both the resettling eminence and the unpublishableness happens the gravel does not occur. sent9: the lash does not occur. sent10: if the dehiscence does not occur then the gravelling occurs. sent11: the nonspecificness prevents that the dehiscence does not occur. sent12: the honeying bathroom occurs. sent13: the ectopicness does not occur. sent14: the fact that the non-juicelessness and the non-Zambianness occurs does not hold. sent15: the juicelessness happens if the fact that both the non-juicelessness and the non-Zambianness happens does not hold. sent16: the resettling eminence happens if the dehiscence occurs. sent17: that the football does not occur and the resettling serosa does not occur does not hold. sent18: that both the lash and the unpublishableness happens is false if the Zambian does not occur. sent19: if the fact that the honeying bathroom and the resettling eminence occurs does not hold the resettling eminence does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that both the non-ectopicness and the nonspecificness happens does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the juicelessness does not occur.; sent15 & sent14 -> int2: the juicelessness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: both the non-ectopicness and the nonspecificness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the nonspecificness occurs.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the dehiscence happens.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the resettling eminence happens.; sent4 & sent9 -> int8: the unpublishableness occurs and the honeying bathroom happens.; int8 -> int9: that the unpublishableness occurs is not incorrect.; int7 & int9 -> int10: both the resettling eminence and the unpublishableness happens.; int10 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__