the fact that there exists something such that if it is curatorial then it is a Nanticoke that is not a kind of an appropriator does not hold.
sent1: if the stumblebum does pelt then it is not a signage. sent2: there exists something such that if it is feudatory then it is Bahraini thing that is not illogical. sent3: something flakes Halab but it is not a kind of a Sumatran if it is a Nanticoke. sent4: there exists something such that if it is curatorial then it is a kind of a Nanticoke and it is a kind of an appropriator. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a juggler then it is not a mayfish. sent6: there exists something such that if it is benedictory that it is a kind of a pliers is right. sent7: if the stumblebum is curatorial then it is a Nanticoke that is not an appropriator.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the earthnut is a Nanticoke is correct it does flake Halab and is not Sumatran.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is curatorial then it is a Nanticoke that is not a kind of an appropriator does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stumblebum does pelt then it is not a signage. sent2: there exists something such that if it is feudatory then it is Bahraini thing that is not illogical. sent3: something flakes Halab but it is not a kind of a Sumatran if it is a Nanticoke. sent4: there exists something such that if it is curatorial then it is a kind of a Nanticoke and it is a kind of an appropriator. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a juggler then it is not a mayfish. sent6: there exists something such that if it is benedictory that it is a kind of a pliers is right. sent7: if the stumblebum is curatorial then it is a Nanticoke that is not an appropriator. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__