the succulent is a kind of a purity.
sent1: if the fact that the anode does not disengage but it is a herringbone is false then the tachistoscope is not a herringbone. sent2: something does soothe. sent3: the rangpur does not soothe if the iceman does not soothe and does whiff tachistoscope. sent4: if the fact that something is a Churchill or not collapsible or both is incorrect then it is a kind of a Sappho. sent5: if something is not a kind of a herringbone that it is a Churchill and/or it is noncollapsible does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that it designs Zeno and does not whiff tachistoscope. sent7: the fact that the clary designs Zeno and does not whiff tachistoscope does not hold if there exists something such that it soothes. sent8: the fact that the clary is a purity that does design Zeno is incorrect if that the rangpur does not soothe is true. sent9: the iceman does not soothe and does whiff tachistoscope if the tachistoscope is a Sappho.
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: that the clary does design Zeno and does not whiff tachistoscope does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does design Zeno and it does not whiff tachistoscope is false.;
the succulent is not a purity.
sent4 -> int3: the tachistoscope is a kind of a Sappho if that it is a kind of a Churchill and/or it is not collapsible does not hold.; sent5 -> int4: the fact that that either the tachistoscope is a Churchill or it is not collapsible or both is wrong is true if it is not a herringbone.;
$hypothesis$ = the succulent is a kind of a purity. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the anode does not disengage but it is a herringbone is false then the tachistoscope is not a herringbone. sent2: something does soothe. sent3: the rangpur does not soothe if the iceman does not soothe and does whiff tachistoscope. sent4: if the fact that something is a Churchill or not collapsible or both is incorrect then it is a kind of a Sappho. sent5: if something is not a kind of a herringbone that it is a Churchill and/or it is noncollapsible does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that it designs Zeno and does not whiff tachistoscope. sent7: the fact that the clary designs Zeno and does not whiff tachistoscope does not hold if there exists something such that it soothes. sent8: the fact that the clary is a purity that does design Zeno is incorrect if that the rangpur does not soothe is true. sent9: the iceman does not soothe and does whiff tachistoscope if the tachistoscope is a Sappho. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: that the clary does design Zeno and does not whiff tachistoscope does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does design Zeno and it does not whiff tachistoscope is false.; __UNKNOWN__