the fruitwood is a kind of a collision.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is a collision or it is pyemic or both is not right then the falafel is not a kind of a garambulla. sent2: if the outthrust is pyemic then that either it is not a garambulla or it does not light or both is incorrect. sent3: if the territory is a garambulla and pyemic then that the fruitwood is not a kind of a collision is correct. sent4: if something is Hellenic then it is a kind of a garambulla. sent5: the fruitwood is not livable if there exists something such that the fact that either it does not light or it is not Hellenic or both does not hold. sent6: the territory does not scourge graph if that that it scourge graph and is livable hold is not true. sent7: the outthrust is providential but it does not purify cusk. sent8: the outthrust is pyemic if the fact that the falafel does scourge alkyl is true. sent9: the fact that something is a collision or not non-pyemic or both is false if it does not scourge alkyl. sent10: something does not scourge alkyl if the fact that it does not scourge graph and moves does not hold. sent11: that the outthrust is not lighting or it is not Hellenic or both is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a garambulla. sent12: the fact that the territory scourges graph and it is livable is false. sent13: if the territory scourges alkyl and does not scourge graph the falafel scourges alkyl. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is Linnaean and it is livable is not correct. sent15: the territory scourges alkyl and it is pyemic if it does not scourge graph. sent16: the territory is not non-Hellenic if the falafel lights. sent17: if the outthrust is a kind of providential thing that does not purify cusk the falafel is not non-lighting.
sent17 & sent7 -> int1: the falafel is a lighting.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the territory is Hellenic.; sent4 -> int3: if the territory is not non-Hellenic it is a garambulla.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the territory is a garambulla.; sent6 & sent12 -> int5: the territory does not scourge graph.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the territory scourges alkyl and it is pyemic.; int6 -> int7: the territory is pyemic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the territory is a garambulla and it is pyemic.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fruitwood is not livable.
sent9 -> int9: that the territory is a kind of a collision and/or it is pyemic is not right if it does not scourge alkyl.; sent10 -> int10: the territory does not scourge alkyl if the fact that it does not scourge graph and moves is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fruitwood is a kind of a collision. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is a collision or it is pyemic or both is not right then the falafel is not a kind of a garambulla. sent2: if the outthrust is pyemic then that either it is not a garambulla or it does not light or both is incorrect. sent3: if the territory is a garambulla and pyemic then that the fruitwood is not a kind of a collision is correct. sent4: if something is Hellenic then it is a kind of a garambulla. sent5: the fruitwood is not livable if there exists something such that the fact that either it does not light or it is not Hellenic or both does not hold. sent6: the territory does not scourge graph if that that it scourge graph and is livable hold is not true. sent7: the outthrust is providential but it does not purify cusk. sent8: the outthrust is pyemic if the fact that the falafel does scourge alkyl is true. sent9: the fact that something is a collision or not non-pyemic or both is false if it does not scourge alkyl. sent10: something does not scourge alkyl if the fact that it does not scourge graph and moves does not hold. sent11: that the outthrust is not lighting or it is not Hellenic or both is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a garambulla. sent12: the fact that the territory scourges graph and it is livable is false. sent13: if the territory scourges alkyl and does not scourge graph the falafel scourges alkyl. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is Linnaean and it is livable is not correct. sent15: the territory scourges alkyl and it is pyemic if it does not scourge graph. sent16: the territory is not non-Hellenic if the falafel lights. sent17: if the outthrust is a kind of providential thing that does not purify cusk the falafel is not non-lighting. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent7 -> int1: the falafel is a lighting.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the territory is Hellenic.; sent4 -> int3: if the territory is not non-Hellenic it is a garambulla.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the territory is a garambulla.; sent6 & sent12 -> int5: the territory does not scourge graph.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the territory scourges alkyl and it is pyemic.; int6 -> int7: the territory is pyemic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the territory is a garambulla and it is pyemic.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__