that there is something such that if it does not scout cyclicity it is not intercellular is incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that something does not scout cyclicity is right then it is intercellular. sent2: there is something such that if it is rectosigmoid that it does not outlive is right. sent3: the proteome does not vote if it is intercellular. sent4: that something is not a Seoul hold if it is not a abducent. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not scout cyclicity it is intercellular. sent6: if something does not scout cyclicity it is not intercellular. sent7: if the puccoon is not intercellular then it is a dichondra.
sent6 -> int1: if the proteome does not scout cyclicity it is not intercellular.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not scout cyclicity it is not intercellular is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not scout cyclicity is right then it is intercellular. sent2: there is something such that if it is rectosigmoid that it does not outlive is right. sent3: the proteome does not vote if it is intercellular. sent4: that something is not a Seoul hold if it is not a abducent. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not scout cyclicity it is intercellular. sent6: if something does not scout cyclicity it is not intercellular. sent7: if the puccoon is not intercellular then it is a dichondra. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the proteome does not scout cyclicity it is not intercellular.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__