the knit does not subtilize Cassiope.
sent1: that the knit does appropriate adulterator and is a kind of a finagler is correct. sent2: if there is something such that it subtilizes sag the adulterator is not a bisexual. sent3: there exists something such that it subtilizes sag. sent4: if the knit is jointed thing that appropriates adulterator it does not subtilize Cassiope. sent5: the knit does appropriate adulterator if the adulterator does not subtilize Cassiope and is bisexual. sent6: if the fact that something is a kind of jointed thing that does aspire is true then it does not pontificate. sent7: the adulterator is not a intransitive if it is a kind of a finagler that subtilizes Cassiope. sent8: if the adulterator is not bisexual and is a intransitive then the knit does joint. sent9: if there is something such that it does subtilize sag then that the adulterator is not a kind of a bisexual but it is intransitive is right.
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the adulterator is not bisexual but it is intransitive.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the knit is jointed.; sent1 -> int3: the knit does appropriate adulterator.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the knit joints and it does appropriate adulterator.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
if the adulterator is a kind of a jointed and it does aspire it does not pontificate.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the knit does not subtilize Cassiope. ; $context$ = sent1: that the knit does appropriate adulterator and is a kind of a finagler is correct. sent2: if there is something such that it subtilizes sag the adulterator is not a bisexual. sent3: there exists something such that it subtilizes sag. sent4: if the knit is jointed thing that appropriates adulterator it does not subtilize Cassiope. sent5: the knit does appropriate adulterator if the adulterator does not subtilize Cassiope and is bisexual. sent6: if the fact that something is a kind of jointed thing that does aspire is true then it does not pontificate. sent7: the adulterator is not a intransitive if it is a kind of a finagler that subtilizes Cassiope. sent8: if the adulterator is not bisexual and is a intransitive then the knit does joint. sent9: if there is something such that it does subtilize sag then that the adulterator is not a kind of a bisexual but it is intransitive is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the adulterator is not bisexual but it is intransitive.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the knit is jointed.; sent1 -> int3: the knit does appropriate adulterator.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the knit joints and it does appropriate adulterator.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__