there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of an umbra and slips is not true it is intergalactic.
sent1: the LCD is intergalactic if it is not an umbra and does slip. sent2: there is something such that if that it is an umbra and it is a kind of a slipping is false it is intergalactic. sent3: something is a beta-carotene if the fact that it is not creedal and does subject LCD is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the LCD is not a Osage but it is air-to-air is false it is a kind of a effortlessness. sent5: there is something such that if it is not an umbra but a slipping the fact that it is intergalactic is not incorrect. sent6: the LCD is intergalactic if that it is an umbra and a slipping is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the LCD does not tsk and is a kind of a pipage does not hold then it is a slipping. sent8: if the fact that something is both not an abductor and a mantle is incorrect then it is unintelligible. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a slipping then that it is intergalactic is correct. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is mandibular hold it does polychrome. sent11: there is something such that if it is an umbra it is intergalactic. sent12: the LCD is intergalactic if it is not a kind of a slipping. sent13: the LCD is intergalactic if the fact that it is not an umbra but a slipping is incorrect. sent14: the limbers is an umbra if that it is not tearless but bionic is false.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not an abductor and mantles is not correct then it is unintelligible.
sent8 -> int1: if that the patchwork is not a kind of an abductor but it does mantle is wrong it is unintelligible.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of an umbra and slips is not true it is intergalactic. ; $context$ = sent1: the LCD is intergalactic if it is not an umbra and does slip. sent2: there is something such that if that it is an umbra and it is a kind of a slipping is false it is intergalactic. sent3: something is a beta-carotene if the fact that it is not creedal and does subject LCD is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the LCD is not a Osage but it is air-to-air is false it is a kind of a effortlessness. sent5: there is something such that if it is not an umbra but a slipping the fact that it is intergalactic is not incorrect. sent6: the LCD is intergalactic if that it is an umbra and a slipping is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the LCD does not tsk and is a kind of a pipage does not hold then it is a slipping. sent8: if the fact that something is both not an abductor and a mantle is incorrect then it is unintelligible. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a slipping then that it is intergalactic is correct. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is mandibular hold it does polychrome. sent11: there is something such that if it is an umbra it is intergalactic. sent12: the LCD is intergalactic if it is not a kind of a slipping. sent13: the LCD is intergalactic if the fact that it is not an umbra but a slipping is incorrect. sent14: the limbers is an umbra if that it is not tearless but bionic is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__