the biliariness happens.
sent1: that the biliariness happens and the dreaming vernacular does not occur does not hold if the smiting okra happens. sent2: the non-trivalentness results in that the remission does not occur and the dreaming Shaker does not occur. sent3: if the whistling filefish does not occur the sidetracking happens and the typification happens. sent4: the remission but not the smiting okra happens. sent5: the insemination does not occur if the headshake occurs and the sidetracking happens. sent6: that the remission does not occur and the dreaming Shaker does not occur brings about the smiting okra. sent7: the raying does not occur and the Peruvian happens. sent8: the fact that the propaedeutic does not occur is correct. sent9: the non-biliariness is prevented by that not the headshake but the arbitraging happens. sent10: the sidetracking but not the whistling filefish occurs. sent11: the smiting dampener occurs. sent12: the doctor and the head occurs. sent13: that if the headshake does not occur and the insemination does not occur the whistling filefish does not occur is true. sent14: the dreaming vernacular and the arbitraging occurs if the smiting okra does not occur. sent15: the insemination occurs.
sent10 -> int1: the sidetracking happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the headshake occurs is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the headshake occurs and the sidetracking occurs is right.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the insemination does not occur.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the headshake does not occur.; sent4 -> int6: the smiting okra does not occur.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: that both the dreaming vernacular and the arbitraging occurs is correct.; int7 -> int8: the arbitraging occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: not the headshake but the arbitrage happens.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the typification happens.
$hypothesis$ = the biliariness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the biliariness happens and the dreaming vernacular does not occur does not hold if the smiting okra happens. sent2: the non-trivalentness results in that the remission does not occur and the dreaming Shaker does not occur. sent3: if the whistling filefish does not occur the sidetracking happens and the typification happens. sent4: the remission but not the smiting okra happens. sent5: the insemination does not occur if the headshake occurs and the sidetracking happens. sent6: that the remission does not occur and the dreaming Shaker does not occur brings about the smiting okra. sent7: the raying does not occur and the Peruvian happens. sent8: the fact that the propaedeutic does not occur is correct. sent9: the non-biliariness is prevented by that not the headshake but the arbitraging happens. sent10: the sidetracking but not the whistling filefish occurs. sent11: the smiting dampener occurs. sent12: the doctor and the head occurs. sent13: that if the headshake does not occur and the insemination does not occur the whistling filefish does not occur is true. sent14: the dreaming vernacular and the arbitraging occurs if the smiting okra does not occur. sent15: the insemination occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the sidetracking happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the headshake occurs is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the headshake occurs and the sidetracking occurs is right.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the insemination does not occur.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the headshake does not occur.; sent4 -> int6: the smiting okra does not occur.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: that both the dreaming vernacular and the arbitraging occurs is correct.; int7 -> int8: the arbitraging occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: not the headshake but the arbitrage happens.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__