the haploid is an alluring.
sent1: if the fact that the tricyclic is a kind of an alluring and it is a miniaturization is not true it is not a kind of an alluring. sent2: the reincarnation is non-ascensional. sent3: the sporophyte is a kind of a neoexpressionism. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it does qualify is not wrong the reincarnation is both not uncared-for and not ascensional. sent5: there is something such that that it does hug matron hold. sent6: the freestone is a braid. sent7: if the reincarnation is not uncared-for and it is not ascensional it does not hug pussy-paw. sent8: if the reincarnation is not uncared-for then the haploid hugs pussy-paw. sent9: the reincarnation does not prioritize if it does not hug pussy-paw. sent10: the reincarnation does not hug pussy-paw if there is something such that it is ascensional. sent11: if there exists something such that that it does not hug pussy-paw and it prioritizes is incorrect then the haploid is uncared-for. sent12: if the tricyclic is not a kind of an alluring then that the haploid does not prioritize and is not alvine is not right. sent13: the Samaritan does qualify. sent14: that the tricyclic is an alluring that is a miniaturization is not right. sent15: the haploid does bespangle and it does snuffle laterite. sent16: if something that is uncared-for does qualify the fact that it is not a kind of an alluring is not incorrect. sent17: if there is something such that that it does hug pussy-paw is not incorrect then the reincarnation is uncared-for and/or it is not ascensional. sent18: the tricyclic does not reciprocate requirement. sent19: if the reincarnation does not prioritize the haploid is a kind of alvine thing that is a kind of an alluring. sent20: something is not a squeal and not a speaker if it does not qualify. sent21: if the tricyclic does not reciprocate requirement that it does not hug pussy-paw and it prioritizes is false.
sent13 -> int1: there exists something such that it does qualify.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the reincarnation is not uncared-for and is not ascensional.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the reincarnation does not hug pussy-paw.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the reincarnation does not prioritize.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the haploid is both not non-alvine and an alluring.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the haploid is not an alluring.
sent16 -> int6: if the haploid is uncared-for and it does qualify then it is not an alluring.; sent21 & sent18 -> int7: the fact that the tricyclic does not hug pussy-paw and does prioritize is false.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it does not hug pussy-paw and does prioritize does not hold.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the haploid is uncared-for.;
$hypothesis$ = the haploid is an alluring. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the tricyclic is a kind of an alluring and it is a miniaturization is not true it is not a kind of an alluring. sent2: the reincarnation is non-ascensional. sent3: the sporophyte is a kind of a neoexpressionism. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it does qualify is not wrong the reincarnation is both not uncared-for and not ascensional. sent5: there is something such that that it does hug matron hold. sent6: the freestone is a braid. sent7: if the reincarnation is not uncared-for and it is not ascensional it does not hug pussy-paw. sent8: if the reincarnation is not uncared-for then the haploid hugs pussy-paw. sent9: the reincarnation does not prioritize if it does not hug pussy-paw. sent10: the reincarnation does not hug pussy-paw if there is something such that it is ascensional. sent11: if there exists something such that that it does not hug pussy-paw and it prioritizes is incorrect then the haploid is uncared-for. sent12: if the tricyclic is not a kind of an alluring then that the haploid does not prioritize and is not alvine is not right. sent13: the Samaritan does qualify. sent14: that the tricyclic is an alluring that is a miniaturization is not right. sent15: the haploid does bespangle and it does snuffle laterite. sent16: if something that is uncared-for does qualify the fact that it is not a kind of an alluring is not incorrect. sent17: if there is something such that that it does hug pussy-paw is not incorrect then the reincarnation is uncared-for and/or it is not ascensional. sent18: the tricyclic does not reciprocate requirement. sent19: if the reincarnation does not prioritize the haploid is a kind of alvine thing that is a kind of an alluring. sent20: something is not a squeal and not a speaker if it does not qualify. sent21: if the tricyclic does not reciprocate requirement that it does not hug pussy-paw and it prioritizes is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: there exists something such that it does qualify.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the reincarnation is not uncared-for and is not ascensional.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the reincarnation does not hug pussy-paw.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the reincarnation does not prioritize.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the haploid is both not non-alvine and an alluring.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__