the cultism occurs.
sent1: that the Frenching Bartholin and the carelessness occurs is brought about by that the endarterectomy does not occur. sent2: the film occurs. sent3: the word and the filming occurs. sent4: that the carelessness occurs and the cultism does not occur is caused by that the endarterectomy does not occur. sent5: that the cismontaneness does not occur results in that the sericulture and the spitter occurs. sent6: the fact that not the quantization but the sericulture happens is not true if that the snicking frequentative does not occur is correct. sent7: the proliferating dromaeosaur and the downness happens. sent8: the evanescing does not occur if that the quantization does not occur but the sericulture happens does not hold. sent9: that the allopatricness does not occur yields that the bicentennial does not occur and/or the snicking frequentative does not occur. sent10: both the imagining and the Frenching aberrance happens. sent11: the Buddhistness does not occur. sent12: if the evanescing does not occur then the cultism does not occur and the film does not occur. sent13: if the carelessness does not occur the cultism occurs. sent14: the gymnosophicalness does not occur. sent15: that both the word and the filming happens is false if the evanescing does not occur. sent16: that the carelessness happens and the endarterectomy occurs prevents that the word occurs. sent17: the quintessentialness happens. sent18: the non-allopatricness and/or that the gymnosophicalness does not occur prevents that the allopatricness happens. sent19: the Frenching shepherdess occurs. sent20: the cismontaneness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carelessness happens.; sent3 -> int1: the word occurs.;
the cultism does not occur.
sent5 & sent20 -> int2: the sericulture and the spitter occurs.; int2 -> int3: the sericulture happens.; sent14 -> int4: either the non-allopatricness or the non-gymnosophicalness or both happens.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the allopatricness occurs is not true.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the bicentennialness does not occur or the snicking frequentative does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the cultism occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Frenching Bartholin and the carelessness occurs is brought about by that the endarterectomy does not occur. sent2: the film occurs. sent3: the word and the filming occurs. sent4: that the carelessness occurs and the cultism does not occur is caused by that the endarterectomy does not occur. sent5: that the cismontaneness does not occur results in that the sericulture and the spitter occurs. sent6: the fact that not the quantization but the sericulture happens is not true if that the snicking frequentative does not occur is correct. sent7: the proliferating dromaeosaur and the downness happens. sent8: the evanescing does not occur if that the quantization does not occur but the sericulture happens does not hold. sent9: that the allopatricness does not occur yields that the bicentennial does not occur and/or the snicking frequentative does not occur. sent10: both the imagining and the Frenching aberrance happens. sent11: the Buddhistness does not occur. sent12: if the evanescing does not occur then the cultism does not occur and the film does not occur. sent13: if the carelessness does not occur the cultism occurs. sent14: the gymnosophicalness does not occur. sent15: that both the word and the filming happens is false if the evanescing does not occur. sent16: that the carelessness happens and the endarterectomy occurs prevents that the word occurs. sent17: the quintessentialness happens. sent18: the non-allopatricness and/or that the gymnosophicalness does not occur prevents that the allopatricness happens. sent19: the Frenching shepherdess occurs. sent20: the cismontaneness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carelessness happens.; sent3 -> int1: the word occurs.; __UNKNOWN__