if the bubbler is fingerless then the parer is a hyponatremia.
sent1: the fact that if the fact that something is non-bettering thing that does not disrespect concessionaire does not hold it is not fingerless hold. sent2: if the parer is not a hyponatremia that the bubbler is not a bettering and does not disrespect concessionaire is false. sent3: that that something is non-fingerless thing that is not a hyponatremia hold does not hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a cursed hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the parer is not a hyponatremia.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the bubbler is non-bettering thing that does not disrespect concessionaire does not hold.; sent1 -> int2: if that the bubbler is not a bettering and does not disrespect concessionaire does not hold then that it is fingerless is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bubbler is not fingerless.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bubbler is fingerless.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the parer is a hyponatremia.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the louver does disrespect concessionaire.
sent3 -> int6: if the fact that the bubbler does not curse is not false then that it is not fingerless and it is not a kind of a hyponatremia is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = if the bubbler is fingerless then the parer is a hyponatremia. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the fact that something is non-bettering thing that does not disrespect concessionaire does not hold it is not fingerless hold. sent2: if the parer is not a hyponatremia that the bubbler is not a bettering and does not disrespect concessionaire is false. sent3: that that something is non-fingerless thing that is not a hyponatremia hold does not hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a cursed hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the parer is not a hyponatremia.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the bubbler is non-bettering thing that does not disrespect concessionaire does not hold.; sent1 -> int2: if that the bubbler is not a bettering and does not disrespect concessionaire does not hold then that it is fingerless is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bubbler is not fingerless.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bubbler is fingerless.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the parer is a hyponatremia.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__