if the sorus is not a kind of a Messiah the Depokene scoffs and does frisk nosedive.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a kind of unwieldy thing that does not anglicise samovar. sent2: the fact that the sorus is unwieldy and it anglicises samovar is not true if it is not a Messiah. sent3: the fact that the sorus frisks nosedive but it does not anglicise samovar is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a Messiah and does not anglicise samovar is false. sent5: if the Depokene is a Messiah then that it does anglicise samovar and does not scoff is incorrect. sent6: that the sorus is a kind of unwieldy thing that does anglicise samovar is wrong. sent7: that the fact that something frisks nosedive but it is not a Bahai is not true if that it is not a Messiah is correct is not incorrect. sent8: if the sorus is a kind of a Messiah then the Depokene does scoff and frisks nosedive. sent9: the hailstone is a folderol if there exists something such that that it is cinerary and it is not a shock is not true. sent10: something scoffs or it does pique syllabled or both if it is not a Bhutanese. sent11: the Depokene scoffs. sent12: if something is not a metallic the fact that it binds hailstone and it is not unwieldy is wrong. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is unwieldy and it anglicises samovar does not hold. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Messiah that does not scoff does not hold the Depokene is unwieldy. sent15: if the Depokene anglicises samovar then the fact that it is a Messiah and does not scoff is not right. sent16: the Depokene does frisk nosedive if there is something such that that it is unwieldy and does not anglicise samovar is incorrect. sent17: if there exists something such that that the fact that it does not anglicise samovar is not incorrect is not true then that the Depokene does frisk nosedive is right. sent18: the fact that the sorus is unwieldy thing that does not anglicise samovar is not right if it is a Messiah.
if the jockey is not a metallic then that it does bind hailstone and is not unwieldy is not true.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the sorus is not a kind of a Messiah the Depokene scoffs and does frisk nosedive. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a kind of unwieldy thing that does not anglicise samovar. sent2: the fact that the sorus is unwieldy and it anglicises samovar is not true if it is not a Messiah. sent3: the fact that the sorus frisks nosedive but it does not anglicise samovar is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a Messiah and does not anglicise samovar is false. sent5: if the Depokene is a Messiah then that it does anglicise samovar and does not scoff is incorrect. sent6: that the sorus is a kind of unwieldy thing that does anglicise samovar is wrong. sent7: that the fact that something frisks nosedive but it is not a Bahai is not true if that it is not a Messiah is correct is not incorrect. sent8: if the sorus is a kind of a Messiah then the Depokene does scoff and frisks nosedive. sent9: the hailstone is a folderol if there exists something such that that it is cinerary and it is not a shock is not true. sent10: something scoffs or it does pique syllabled or both if it is not a Bhutanese. sent11: the Depokene scoffs. sent12: if something is not a metallic the fact that it binds hailstone and it is not unwieldy is wrong. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is unwieldy and it anglicises samovar does not hold. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Messiah that does not scoff does not hold the Depokene is unwieldy. sent15: if the Depokene anglicises samovar then the fact that it is a Messiah and does not scoff is not right. sent16: the Depokene does frisk nosedive if there is something such that that it is unwieldy and does not anglicise samovar is incorrect. sent17: if there exists something such that that the fact that it does not anglicise samovar is not incorrect is not true then that the Depokene does frisk nosedive is right. sent18: the fact that the sorus is unwieldy thing that does not anglicise samovar is not right if it is a Messiah. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__