the subartesianness does not occur.
sent1: not the moot but the authorization happens if the multinucleateness occurs. sent2: the fact that the subartesianness does not occur hold if the iridicness happens and the moot occurs. sent3: if the cumulus does not occur then the disengagement occurs and the multinucleateness happens. sent4: the iridicness happens and the denotativeness occurs. sent5: the moot occurs. sent6: the denotativeness occurs. sent7: the subartesianness occurs if the iridicness does not occur. sent8: the compromising interstate happens. sent9: that both the elbowing and the iridicness occurs is caused by that the moot does not occur.
sent4 -> int1: the iridicness happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: both the iridicness and the moot occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the subartesianness happens is right.
$hypothesis$ = the subartesianness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: not the moot but the authorization happens if the multinucleateness occurs. sent2: the fact that the subartesianness does not occur hold if the iridicness happens and the moot occurs. sent3: if the cumulus does not occur then the disengagement occurs and the multinucleateness happens. sent4: the iridicness happens and the denotativeness occurs. sent5: the moot occurs. sent6: the denotativeness occurs. sent7: the subartesianness occurs if the iridicness does not occur. sent8: the compromising interstate happens. sent9: that both the elbowing and the iridicness occurs is caused by that the moot does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the iridicness happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: both the iridicness and the moot occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__