the janissary does not spectate Concepcion.
sent1: the broadcloth is aquicultural if the squark is a bachelorhood. sent2: the fact that something is not aquicultural but it is a scrap is not right if it is not a bachelorhood. sent3: the broadcloth does wrench. sent4: if that the bombshell is a bachelorhood but it does not spectate Concepcion is wrong then the janissary does spectate Concepcion. sent5: the bombshell does dim if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a swerve that is not trabecular is correct is not correct. sent6: that the bombshell is a kind of a swerve but it is not trabecular does not hold. sent7: that the janissary does not spectate lividity and is a kind of a great-nephew is not true if it is not a kind of a teju. sent8: the janissary does not prop caucus if the fact that that it does not spectate lividity and is a great-nephew hold does not hold. sent9: that that either something does not dim or it is not a wrench or both is not false does not hold if it is not a teju. sent10: if something that is not a great-nephew spectates lividity then the fact that it is not a teju is not incorrect. sent11: if that the bombshell does not dim and/or it is not a wrench is false then the naiad is not a bachelorhood. sent12: the squark is a bachelorhood if the bombshell is dim. sent13: if the broadcloth is aquicultural and it is a wrench the janissary is not a teju. sent14: the bombshell is dim if it is not a swerve. sent15: the janissary does not spectate Concepcion if it does not prop caucus.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: that the bombshell dims is correct.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the squark is a bachelorhood.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the broadcloth is not non-aquicultural.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the broadcloth is aquicultural and it is a wrench.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the janissary is not a teju is true.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the janissary does not spectate lividity but it is a great-nephew is not right.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the janissary does not prop caucus.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the janissary spectates Concepcion.
$hypothesis$ = the janissary does not spectate Concepcion. ; $context$ = sent1: the broadcloth is aquicultural if the squark is a bachelorhood. sent2: the fact that something is not aquicultural but it is a scrap is not right if it is not a bachelorhood. sent3: the broadcloth does wrench. sent4: if that the bombshell is a bachelorhood but it does not spectate Concepcion is wrong then the janissary does spectate Concepcion. sent5: the bombshell does dim if the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a swerve that is not trabecular is correct is not correct. sent6: that the bombshell is a kind of a swerve but it is not trabecular does not hold. sent7: that the janissary does not spectate lividity and is a kind of a great-nephew is not true if it is not a kind of a teju. sent8: the janissary does not prop caucus if the fact that that it does not spectate lividity and is a great-nephew hold does not hold. sent9: that that either something does not dim or it is not a wrench or both is not false does not hold if it is not a teju. sent10: if something that is not a great-nephew spectates lividity then the fact that it is not a teju is not incorrect. sent11: if that the bombshell does not dim and/or it is not a wrench is false then the naiad is not a bachelorhood. sent12: the squark is a bachelorhood if the bombshell is dim. sent13: if the broadcloth is aquicultural and it is a wrench the janissary is not a teju. sent14: the bombshell is dim if it is not a swerve. sent15: the janissary does not spectate Concepcion if it does not prop caucus. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: that the bombshell dims is correct.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the squark is a bachelorhood.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the broadcloth is not non-aquicultural.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the broadcloth is aquicultural and it is a wrench.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the janissary is not a teju is true.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the janissary does not spectate lividity but it is a great-nephew is not right.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the janissary does not prop caucus.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__