the fact that the underseller is a kind of a firebrat if the compilation brushes and is not a kind of a sapidity is not correct.
sent1: if the underseller slices superiority but it is not a brush the compilation is a firebrat. sent2: if something does honor aeration then it does fumble Alcedo. sent3: if there is something such that it fumbles Alcedo and it is viscometric then the underseller is a firebrat. sent4: that the compilation is a conk and does not slice superiority is incorrect. sent5: something is viscometric if it brushes and it is not a sapidity. sent6: the compilation is viscometric if it is a brush and it is a sapidity. sent7: if the fact that the compilation is a kind of a conk that does not slice superiority is false then it honors aeration.
sent5 -> int1: if the compilation is a brush that is not a sapidity it is viscometric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the compilation is a kind of a brush but it is not a sapidity.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the compilation is viscometric.; sent2 -> int3: the compilation does fumble Alcedo if it does honor aeration.; sent7 & sent4 -> int4: the compilation does honor aeration.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the compilation does fumble Alcedo.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the compilation does fumble Alcedo and it is viscometric.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it fumbles Alcedo and it is viscometric.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the underseller is a kind of a firebrat.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the underseller is a kind of a firebrat if the compilation brushes and is not a kind of a sapidity is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the underseller slices superiority but it is not a brush the compilation is a firebrat. sent2: if something does honor aeration then it does fumble Alcedo. sent3: if there is something such that it fumbles Alcedo and it is viscometric then the underseller is a firebrat. sent4: that the compilation is a conk and does not slice superiority is incorrect. sent5: something is viscometric if it brushes and it is not a sapidity. sent6: the compilation is viscometric if it is a brush and it is a sapidity. sent7: if the fact that the compilation is a kind of a conk that does not slice superiority is false then it honors aeration. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the compilation is a brush that is not a sapidity it is viscometric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the compilation is a kind of a brush but it is not a sapidity.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the compilation is viscometric.; sent2 -> int3: the compilation does fumble Alcedo if it does honor aeration.; sent7 & sent4 -> int4: the compilation does honor aeration.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the compilation does fumble Alcedo.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the compilation does fumble Alcedo and it is viscometric.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it fumbles Alcedo and it is viscometric.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the underseller is a kind of a firebrat.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__