either the bufo is not a kind of an adhesion or it is not a kind of a Microtus or both.
sent1: the fact that the counterweight is nonspherical and is delicate if the counterweight is not consonantal is correct. sent2: something is a kind of a Microtus. sent3: the fact that something is a crunch is right. sent4: the amphetamine is a crunch and nonspherical. sent5: if the fact that the Skinner is not consonantal but it interposes Attic is not true the drag is a wattmeter. sent6: something that is a wattmeter does interpose xenophobia. sent7: that the counterweight is a salwar is not wrong if something that crunches is nonspherical. sent8: if the drag does interpose xenophobia the ratatouille is a Microtus. sent9: if the counterweight is a salwar then the fact that the Skinner is not consonantal but it interposes Attic is not true. sent10: the bufo is a wattmeter if the drag is a Microtus. sent11: there exists something such that it is a Florence. sent12: there are nonspherical things. sent13: if that the ratatouille is a Microtus is correct either the bufo is not a kind of an adhesion or it is not a Microtus or both. sent14: something that is not a salwar is both not nonspherical and not a crunch.
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a crunch and it is nonspherical.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the counterweight is a salwar.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the Skinner is not consonantal but it interposes Attic is incorrect.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the drag is not a kind of a wattmeter does not hold.; sent6 -> int5: the drag does interpose xenophobia if it is a wattmeter.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the drag does interpose xenophobia.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the ratatouille is a Microtus.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bufo is not an adhesion and/or it is not a Microtus is not right.
sent14 -> int8: if the counterweight is not a salwar it is not nonspherical and it is not a kind of a crunch.;
$hypothesis$ = either the bufo is not a kind of an adhesion or it is not a kind of a Microtus or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the counterweight is nonspherical and is delicate if the counterweight is not consonantal is correct. sent2: something is a kind of a Microtus. sent3: the fact that something is a crunch is right. sent4: the amphetamine is a crunch and nonspherical. sent5: if the fact that the Skinner is not consonantal but it interposes Attic is not true the drag is a wattmeter. sent6: something that is a wattmeter does interpose xenophobia. sent7: that the counterweight is a salwar is not wrong if something that crunches is nonspherical. sent8: if the drag does interpose xenophobia the ratatouille is a Microtus. sent9: if the counterweight is a salwar then the fact that the Skinner is not consonantal but it interposes Attic is not true. sent10: the bufo is a wattmeter if the drag is a Microtus. sent11: there exists something such that it is a Florence. sent12: there are nonspherical things. sent13: if that the ratatouille is a Microtus is correct either the bufo is not a kind of an adhesion or it is not a Microtus or both. sent14: something that is not a salwar is both not nonspherical and not a crunch. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a crunch and it is nonspherical.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the counterweight is a salwar.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the Skinner is not consonantal but it interposes Attic is incorrect.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the drag is not a kind of a wattmeter does not hold.; sent6 -> int5: the drag does interpose xenophobia if it is a wattmeter.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the drag does interpose xenophobia.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the ratatouille is a Microtus.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__