the purchase either is an implant or does slice testing or both.
sent1: the purchase does mint damask if it does not implant and it is a kind of a Kinshasa. sent2: the purchase is not a exarch if that the wraparound is both not a Kinshasa and a exarch is wrong. sent3: that something does implant and/or does slice testing is not right if it is not a exarch. sent4: the purchase is not a reflation but it slices Vaseline. sent5: the wraparound is myopathic if it is not a kind of a Kinshasa and it does mint damask. sent6: the purchase implants if that the wraparound is myopathic is true. sent7: something does not mint damask if it is both antheridial and myopathic. sent8: the blackcock is a sediment. sent9: if the Vaseline does not mint millet then it does thrill and mints alpenstock. sent10: if the albino fumbles cappuccino then the rebutter is myopathic. sent11: if the purchase is non-myopathic thing that does slice testing it is a kind of a Kinshasa. sent12: there exists something such that it is a exarch. sent13: something is antheridial and it mints deathtrap if it does not mint FARC. sent14: if the wraparound slices testing then the purchase is a Kinshasa. sent15: the wraparound is not a kind of a Kinshasa and mints damask if there exists something such that it is a exarch. sent16: something that does not slice meerkat and does slice testing is a sympathy. sent17: the Brahui is a kind of non-myopathic thing that does mint chrysotherapy. sent18: if the Vaseline thrills the albino fumbles cappuccino. sent19: the fact that the rebutter mints FARC does not hold. sent20: the cachou is myopathic. sent21: if the rebutter does not mint damask that the wraparound is not a Kinshasa but it is a exarch is not right.
sent12 & sent15 -> int1: the wraparound is not a kind of a Kinshasa and does mint damask.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the wraparound is myopathic.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the purchase is a kind of an implant.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the purchase implants and/or it slices testing does not hold.
sent3 -> int4: the fact that either the purchase does implant or it does slice testing or both is not right if it is not a exarch.; sent7 -> int5: the rebutter does not mint damask if it is antheridial and is not non-myopathic.; sent13 -> int6: the rebutter is antheridial and it mints deathtrap if it does not mint FARC.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the rebutter is antheridial thing that mints deathtrap.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the rebutter is antheridial hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the purchase either is an implant or does slice testing or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the purchase does mint damask if it does not implant and it is a kind of a Kinshasa. sent2: the purchase is not a exarch if that the wraparound is both not a Kinshasa and a exarch is wrong. sent3: that something does implant and/or does slice testing is not right if it is not a exarch. sent4: the purchase is not a reflation but it slices Vaseline. sent5: the wraparound is myopathic if it is not a kind of a Kinshasa and it does mint damask. sent6: the purchase implants if that the wraparound is myopathic is true. sent7: something does not mint damask if it is both antheridial and myopathic. sent8: the blackcock is a sediment. sent9: if the Vaseline does not mint millet then it does thrill and mints alpenstock. sent10: if the albino fumbles cappuccino then the rebutter is myopathic. sent11: if the purchase is non-myopathic thing that does slice testing it is a kind of a Kinshasa. sent12: there exists something such that it is a exarch. sent13: something is antheridial and it mints deathtrap if it does not mint FARC. sent14: if the wraparound slices testing then the purchase is a Kinshasa. sent15: the wraparound is not a kind of a Kinshasa and mints damask if there exists something such that it is a exarch. sent16: something that does not slice meerkat and does slice testing is a sympathy. sent17: the Brahui is a kind of non-myopathic thing that does mint chrysotherapy. sent18: if the Vaseline thrills the albino fumbles cappuccino. sent19: the fact that the rebutter mints FARC does not hold. sent20: the cachou is myopathic. sent21: if the rebutter does not mint damask that the wraparound is not a Kinshasa but it is a exarch is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent15 -> int1: the wraparound is not a kind of a Kinshasa and does mint damask.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the wraparound is myopathic.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the purchase is a kind of an implant.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__