the rubbing happens.
sent1: if the slam does not occur the rubbing happens and the deflationariness happens. sent2: the lighting happens and the sarcosomalness happens. sent3: if the onomatopoeicness happens that both the lighting and the non-sarcosomalness occurs is incorrect. sent4: that the slam and the lightness occurs leads to that the rubbing does not occur. sent5: both the deflationariness and the slam occurs. sent6: the onomatopoeicness happens if that the fact that the braiding antic does not occur and the onomatopoeicness does not occur does not hold hold.
sent5 -> int1: the slamming happens.; sent2 -> int2: the light happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the slamming occurs and the lighting happens.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the rubbing happens.
$hypothesis$ = the rubbing happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the slam does not occur the rubbing happens and the deflationariness happens. sent2: the lighting happens and the sarcosomalness happens. sent3: if the onomatopoeicness happens that both the lighting and the non-sarcosomalness occurs is incorrect. sent4: that the slam and the lightness occurs leads to that the rubbing does not occur. sent5: both the deflationariness and the slam occurs. sent6: the onomatopoeicness happens if that the fact that the braiding antic does not occur and the onomatopoeicness does not occur does not hold hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the slamming happens.; sent2 -> int2: the light happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the slamming occurs and the lighting happens.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__