the fact that the spit is not a democrat is correct.
sent1: the mercaptopurine does not border but it does dominate mercaptopurine. sent2: the spit is not happy. sent3: that the ammonium does not beat pyrrhotite is not wrong. sent4: the mercaptopurine does beat pyrrhotite. sent5: the fact that the mercaptopurine does dominate obscenity but it is not ulcerative does not hold if the ammonium is a Hahn. sent6: the pyrrhotite is a democrat. sent7: there exists something such that it is unpropitious. sent8: there is something such that it is a democrat. sent9: if there is something such that it does not beat pyrrhotite and it is a democrat then the spit is not a larid. sent10: there is something such that it is not a larid. sent11: if something does tweeze and is not a border then it is a Hahn. sent12: that either something does dominate obscenity or it does not beat pyrrhotite or both is wrong if it is ulcerative. sent13: something that does not dominate gingham tweezes and is not a border. sent14: there is something such that it is a kind of a larid and it is happy. sent15: The pyrrhotite does beat mercaptopurine. sent16: the mercaptopurine is not oblique but it is a kind of a larid. sent17: the ammonium does not dominate gingham. sent18: if the mercaptopurine does beat pyrrhotite then the ammonium is not a larid but it is happy. sent19: if the mercaptopurine does beat pyrrhotite then the ammonium is happy. sent20: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Cretaceous. sent21: the ammonium is not a larid if there is something such that it is not happy and it beats pyrrhotite. sent22: something does not dominate obscenity if the fact that it dominate obscenity and it is not ulcerative is incorrect. sent23: if that that something is both not a larid and happy hold is right the spit is not a kind of a democrat. sent24: if something is not a democrat and is happy then the spit does not beat pyrrhotite.
sent18 & sent4 -> int1: the ammonium is not a larid but it is happy.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a larid but happy is not wrong.; int2 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is not beneficent and it is a stream.
sent12 -> int3: if the spit is ulcerative then that it does dominate obscenity and/or it does not beat pyrrhotite does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the spit is not a democrat is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the mercaptopurine does not border but it does dominate mercaptopurine. sent2: the spit is not happy. sent3: that the ammonium does not beat pyrrhotite is not wrong. sent4: the mercaptopurine does beat pyrrhotite. sent5: the fact that the mercaptopurine does dominate obscenity but it is not ulcerative does not hold if the ammonium is a Hahn. sent6: the pyrrhotite is a democrat. sent7: there exists something such that it is unpropitious. sent8: there is something such that it is a democrat. sent9: if there is something such that it does not beat pyrrhotite and it is a democrat then the spit is not a larid. sent10: there is something such that it is not a larid. sent11: if something does tweeze and is not a border then it is a Hahn. sent12: that either something does dominate obscenity or it does not beat pyrrhotite or both is wrong if it is ulcerative. sent13: something that does not dominate gingham tweezes and is not a border. sent14: there is something such that it is a kind of a larid and it is happy. sent15: The pyrrhotite does beat mercaptopurine. sent16: the mercaptopurine is not oblique but it is a kind of a larid. sent17: the ammonium does not dominate gingham. sent18: if the mercaptopurine does beat pyrrhotite then the ammonium is not a larid but it is happy. sent19: if the mercaptopurine does beat pyrrhotite then the ammonium is happy. sent20: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Cretaceous. sent21: the ammonium is not a larid if there is something such that it is not happy and it beats pyrrhotite. sent22: something does not dominate obscenity if the fact that it dominate obscenity and it is not ulcerative is incorrect. sent23: if that that something is both not a larid and happy hold is right the spit is not a kind of a democrat. sent24: if something is not a democrat and is happy then the spit does not beat pyrrhotite. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent4 -> int1: the ammonium is not a larid but it is happy.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a larid but happy is not wrong.; int2 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__