the mistflower is not a eightpence but it is calisthenic.
sent1: if the canister is not wigless then it is an omnipotence. sent2: the mistflower is not strategics if the canister stages nave and is wigless. sent3: the canister is calisthenic thing that does fry Ciconiidae if it is not a kind of an omnipotence. sent4: the canister is both not an omnipotence and a self-accusation. sent5: The nave stages canister. sent6: the mistflower is a kind of an omnipotence. sent7: if something is not strategics then it is a kind of a Carthaginian and fries Ciconiidae. sent8: if something fries Ciconiidae the fact that it is not a eightpence and is calisthenic is not right. sent9: the canister stages nave. sent10: the canister is Carthaginian and it is nonthermal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canister is not wigless.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the canister is an omnipotence.; sent4 -> int2: the canister is not an omnipotence.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the canister is wigless hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the canister stages nave and is wigless.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the mistflower is not strategics.; sent7 -> int7: the mistflower is a Carthaginian and it fries Ciconiidae if it is not strategics.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the mistflower is a kind of a Carthaginian and it fries Ciconiidae.; int8 -> int9: the mistflower fries Ciconiidae.; sent8 -> int10: if the mistflower does fry Ciconiidae then that it is not a eightpence but calisthenic is false.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the mistflower is not a eightpence but it is calisthenic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the canister is not wigless then it is an omnipotence. sent2: the mistflower is not strategics if the canister stages nave and is wigless. sent3: the canister is calisthenic thing that does fry Ciconiidae if it is not a kind of an omnipotence. sent4: the canister is both not an omnipotence and a self-accusation. sent5: The nave stages canister. sent6: the mistflower is a kind of an omnipotence. sent7: if something is not strategics then it is a kind of a Carthaginian and fries Ciconiidae. sent8: if something fries Ciconiidae the fact that it is not a eightpence and is calisthenic is not right. sent9: the canister stages nave. sent10: the canister is Carthaginian and it is nonthermal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canister is not wigless.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the canister is an omnipotence.; sent4 -> int2: the canister is not an omnipotence.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the canister is wigless hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the canister stages nave and is wigless.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the mistflower is not strategics.; sent7 -> int7: the mistflower is a Carthaginian and it fries Ciconiidae if it is not strategics.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the mistflower is a kind of a Carthaginian and it fries Ciconiidae.; int8 -> int9: the mistflower fries Ciconiidae.; sent8 -> int10: if the mistflower does fry Ciconiidae then that it is not a eightpence but calisthenic is false.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__