the fact that the bootlace is a kind of a bill if the bobcat is an anklebone is false.
sent1: if the bobcat does not bill then the bootlace is a kind of a bill that is a kind of a triggerfish. sent2: the bobcat does not tinkle. sent3: the bootlace does not racketeer if the fact that it is not a triggerfish but a sonograph does not hold. sent4: if the bootlace is not a sinking then the bobcat is a kind of a Howard and tarnishes gamba. sent5: the bootlace does not sink if the gamba is not a sink. sent6: if the fact that something is a kind of a epilation that does not lick is incorrect it is not a aspirator. sent7: that the fact that the bootlace is not a sinking is true if the gamba does not chomp Neosho hold. sent8: if the bobcat is not a bill the bootlace is a kind of a triggerfish. sent9: something is a kind of a sonograph if it is an anklebone and is not a kind of a bill. sent10: if there is something such that it is a Howard the bioflavinoid is an anklebone and is not a bill. sent11: the gamba either is not a sinking or does not chomp Neosho or both. sent12: if the bootlace is not a kind of a Pyrophorus it is not a sonograph. sent13: if the materialization is not a aspirator the bioflavinoid is a kind of providential a triggerfish. sent14: that the bobcat is a triggerfish is not incorrect. sent15: the abductor is not a kind of a epilation. sent16: if that the bobcat is a kind of an anklebone hold then the fact that it is not a sonograph but a racketeering is false. sent17: something does not bill if the fact that it is not a kind of a sonograph and it is a racketeering does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bobcat is a kind of an anklebone.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the bobcat is not a sonograph but a racketeering does not hold is not false.; sent17 -> int2: if that the bobcat is not a sonograph but a racketeering is not right it is not a kind of a bill.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bobcat does not bill.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the bootlace is both a bill and a triggerfish.; int4 -> int5: the bootlace is a kind of a bill.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the bioflavinoid is a sonograph and is providential.
sent9 -> int6: if the bioflavinoid is a kind of an anklebone and is not a kind of a bill then it is a sonograph.; sent11 & sent5 & sent7 -> int7: the bootlace is not a sinking.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the bobcat is a Howard that tarnishes gamba.; int8 -> int9: the bobcat is a kind of a Howard.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a Howard.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the bioflavinoid is a kind of an anklebone but it is not a kind of a bill.; int6 & int11 -> int12: that the bioflavinoid is a sonograph is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int13: if the fact that the materialization is a epilation that is not a licked is not right it is not a aspirator.; sent15 -> int14: something is not a epilation.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bootlace is a kind of a bill if the bobcat is an anklebone is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bobcat does not bill then the bootlace is a kind of a bill that is a kind of a triggerfish. sent2: the bobcat does not tinkle. sent3: the bootlace does not racketeer if the fact that it is not a triggerfish but a sonograph does not hold. sent4: if the bootlace is not a sinking then the bobcat is a kind of a Howard and tarnishes gamba. sent5: the bootlace does not sink if the gamba is not a sink. sent6: if the fact that something is a kind of a epilation that does not lick is incorrect it is not a aspirator. sent7: that the fact that the bootlace is not a sinking is true if the gamba does not chomp Neosho hold. sent8: if the bobcat is not a bill the bootlace is a kind of a triggerfish. sent9: something is a kind of a sonograph if it is an anklebone and is not a kind of a bill. sent10: if there is something such that it is a Howard the bioflavinoid is an anklebone and is not a bill. sent11: the gamba either is not a sinking or does not chomp Neosho or both. sent12: if the bootlace is not a kind of a Pyrophorus it is not a sonograph. sent13: if the materialization is not a aspirator the bioflavinoid is a kind of providential a triggerfish. sent14: that the bobcat is a triggerfish is not incorrect. sent15: the abductor is not a kind of a epilation. sent16: if that the bobcat is a kind of an anklebone hold then the fact that it is not a sonograph but a racketeering is false. sent17: something does not bill if the fact that it is not a kind of a sonograph and it is a racketeering does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bobcat is a kind of an anklebone.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the bobcat is not a sonograph but a racketeering does not hold is not false.; sent17 -> int2: if that the bobcat is not a sonograph but a racketeering is not right it is not a kind of a bill.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bobcat does not bill.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the bootlace is both a bill and a triggerfish.; int4 -> int5: the bootlace is a kind of a bill.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__