the resort does recline footfall.
sent1: the bearnaise is vagile but it does not recline footfall if there exists something such that it is not a Ferocactus. sent2: something is not electrostatics. sent3: if the bearnaise does not recline footfall and/or is vagile then the resort is a Ferocactus. sent4: if the captain is vagile then the anole is not bladdery or it is vagile or both. sent5: the captain is vagile if the bearnaise is econometrics. sent6: there exists something such that it is electrostatics. sent7: the anole is a kind of a Ferocactus. sent8: the bearnaise is vagile and is not a Ferocactus. sent9: the bearnaise is econometrics if that the resort is not a kind of a Ferocactus is correct. sent10: if the anole does not recline footfall the resort is vagile. sent11: the resort is a kind of vagile thing that does not recline footfall if somethings are not econometrics. sent12: there exists something such that it is not a Korbut. sent13: the captain either is not bladdery or is vagile or both if the anole is vagile. sent14: the anole is bladdery or it is vagile or both if that the captain is vagile is true. sent15: if the anole is not bladdery and/or is vagile the resort does recline footfall. sent16: the fact that the resort does not recline footfall hold if the bearnaise does not recline footfall but it is electrostatics. sent17: if the resort does recline footfall then the anole is not bladdery or it does recline footfall or both. sent18: if there is something such that it is not bladdery then the bearnaise is a Ferocactus but it does not recline footfall. sent19: if something is not electrostatics then the bearnaise is econometrics and not a Ferocactus.
sent2 & sent19 -> int1: the bearnaise is econometrics but it is not a Ferocactus.; int1 -> int2: the bearnaise is econometrics.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the captain is vagile.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the anole is not bladdery or it is vagile or both is right.; sent15 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the resort does not recline footfall is true.
$hypothesis$ = the resort does recline footfall. ; $context$ = sent1: the bearnaise is vagile but it does not recline footfall if there exists something such that it is not a Ferocactus. sent2: something is not electrostatics. sent3: if the bearnaise does not recline footfall and/or is vagile then the resort is a Ferocactus. sent4: if the captain is vagile then the anole is not bladdery or it is vagile or both. sent5: the captain is vagile if the bearnaise is econometrics. sent6: there exists something such that it is electrostatics. sent7: the anole is a kind of a Ferocactus. sent8: the bearnaise is vagile and is not a Ferocactus. sent9: the bearnaise is econometrics if that the resort is not a kind of a Ferocactus is correct. sent10: if the anole does not recline footfall the resort is vagile. sent11: the resort is a kind of vagile thing that does not recline footfall if somethings are not econometrics. sent12: there exists something such that it is not a Korbut. sent13: the captain either is not bladdery or is vagile or both if the anole is vagile. sent14: the anole is bladdery or it is vagile or both if that the captain is vagile is true. sent15: if the anole is not bladdery and/or is vagile the resort does recline footfall. sent16: the fact that the resort does not recline footfall hold if the bearnaise does not recline footfall but it is electrostatics. sent17: if the resort does recline footfall then the anole is not bladdery or it does recline footfall or both. sent18: if there is something such that it is not bladdery then the bearnaise is a Ferocactus but it does not recline footfall. sent19: if something is not electrostatics then the bearnaise is econometrics and not a Ferocactus. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent19 -> int1: the bearnaise is econometrics but it is not a Ferocactus.; int1 -> int2: the bearnaise is econometrics.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the captain is vagile.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the anole is not bladdery or it is vagile or both is right.; sent15 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__