the nutter does log cutoff and letters coiffeuse.
sent1: if the fact that the pan logs Ceratodontidae and/or it is not a kind of a lupine does not hold then the nutter does log cutoff. sent2: the intercostal is not unopposable. sent3: the nutter does letter coiffeuse. sent4: the nutter does log cutoff if the fact that the pan does not log Ceratodontidae and/or it is not lupine is wrong. sent5: if the intercostal is not a defensibility the fact that the fact that it is both a ketose and not unopposable is correct is false. sent6: if the desk either is not unopposable or is a kind of a ketose or both the pan is not unopposable. sent7: the fact that the nutter does log cutoff and does letter coiffeuse is not correct if the pan is not a defensibility. sent8: the intercostal is not a defensibility if the desk is not a furlough and is a Winslow. sent9: if either something is not a Winslow or it is a furlough or both it is not a defensibility. sent10: that the pan does log Ceratodontidae hold. sent11: if something letters tricycle it is not unopposable and/or it is a ketose. sent12: if the pan does not log Ceratodontidae then it is not a Winslow. sent13: the desk is not a kind of a furlough. sent14: The coiffeuse does letter nutter. sent15: the desk is not a kind of a furlough but it is a Winslow if the pan is not a Winslow. sent16: the intercostal is both a ketose and not unopposable. sent17: the desk is not a kind of a furlough if the pan is not a Winslow. sent18: the pan does log Ceratodontidae or is not a lupine or both. sent19: that the intercostal is a kind of a ketose and it is unopposable does not hold. sent20: if the intercostal is not a kind of a defensibility the fact that it is a ketose and is unopposable is false.
that the nutter does log cutoff and does letter coiffeuse is wrong.
sent9 -> int1: if either the pan is not a Winslow or it is a furlough or both then it is not a kind of a defensibility.; sent11 -> int2: that the desk is not unopposable or it is a ketose or both hold if it does letter tricycle.;
$hypothesis$ = the nutter does log cutoff and letters coiffeuse. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the pan logs Ceratodontidae and/or it is not a kind of a lupine does not hold then the nutter does log cutoff. sent2: the intercostal is not unopposable. sent3: the nutter does letter coiffeuse. sent4: the nutter does log cutoff if the fact that the pan does not log Ceratodontidae and/or it is not lupine is wrong. sent5: if the intercostal is not a defensibility the fact that the fact that it is both a ketose and not unopposable is correct is false. sent6: if the desk either is not unopposable or is a kind of a ketose or both the pan is not unopposable. sent7: the fact that the nutter does log cutoff and does letter coiffeuse is not correct if the pan is not a defensibility. sent8: the intercostal is not a defensibility if the desk is not a furlough and is a Winslow. sent9: if either something is not a Winslow or it is a furlough or both it is not a defensibility. sent10: that the pan does log Ceratodontidae hold. sent11: if something letters tricycle it is not unopposable and/or it is a ketose. sent12: if the pan does not log Ceratodontidae then it is not a Winslow. sent13: the desk is not a kind of a furlough. sent14: The coiffeuse does letter nutter. sent15: the desk is not a kind of a furlough but it is a Winslow if the pan is not a Winslow. sent16: the intercostal is both a ketose and not unopposable. sent17: the desk is not a kind of a furlough if the pan is not a Winslow. sent18: the pan does log Ceratodontidae or is not a lupine or both. sent19: that the intercostal is a kind of a ketose and it is unopposable does not hold. sent20: if the intercostal is not a kind of a defensibility the fact that it is a ketose and is unopposable is false. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__