that the rambler pegs honeymoon hold.
sent1: the fact that the subject does not rummage comforted and/or it is a wheatear is incorrect if the melamine gazes. sent2: if the fiddlehead is a wound the rambler is not Cappadocian or it is a kind of a wound or both. sent3: that the fiddlehead is both a hob and an absorber is incorrect. sent4: that the planet pegs honeymoon is correct if there is something such that that it rewards paleocerebellum and is a wound does not hold. sent5: the subject is a click if that it does not rummage comforted and/or is a wheatear is false. sent6: the fact that something rewards som and does not reward earful is not correct if it does click. sent7: if that something is a kind of a hob and it is an absorber does not hold then it does not reward earful. sent8: if the fact that the fiddlehead does reward paleocerebellum but it does not reward som is not true then it does wind. sent9: the rambler does not peg honeymoon if the planet peg honeymoon and it does reward earful. sent10: the fact that the planet rewards earful hold if that the subject does reward som but it does not rewards earful is not right. sent11: if the fiddlehead does not reward earful then the fact that it rewards paleocerebellum and does not reward som does not hold. sent12: there exists nothing that is both Cappadocian and a nap. sent13: the aeration is non-Cappadocian if there is something such that the fact that it is non-Cappadocian and it naps is not true. sent14: that the fact that the rambler does peg honeymoon hold if the rambler is not Cappadocian or it is a wound or both hold. sent15: that something rewards paleocerebellum and it is a wound does not hold if it is not Cappadocian.
sent7 -> int1: if that the fiddlehead is a hob that is a kind of an absorber is wrong it does not reward earful.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the fiddlehead does not reward earful hold.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the fiddlehead does reward paleocerebellum but it does not reward som is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the fiddlehead does wind is right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the rambler is either not Cappadocian or a wound or both.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the rambler does not peg honeymoon.
sent15 -> int6: if the aeration is not Cappadocian then that it rewards paleocerebellum and it winds is not true.; sent12 -> int7: the fact that the cordovan is both Cappadocian and a nap is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is Cappadocian and it does nap does not hold.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the aeration is not Cappadocian.; int6 & int9 -> int10: that the aeration does reward paleocerebellum and it is a wound is not right.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it rewards paleocerebellum and it does wind is wrong.; int11 & sent4 -> int12: the planet does peg honeymoon.; sent6 -> int13: if the subject is a click that it does reward som and does not reward earful is false.;
$hypothesis$ = that the rambler pegs honeymoon hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the subject does not rummage comforted and/or it is a wheatear is incorrect if the melamine gazes. sent2: if the fiddlehead is a wound the rambler is not Cappadocian or it is a kind of a wound or both. sent3: that the fiddlehead is both a hob and an absorber is incorrect. sent4: that the planet pegs honeymoon is correct if there is something such that that it rewards paleocerebellum and is a wound does not hold. sent5: the subject is a click if that it does not rummage comforted and/or is a wheatear is false. sent6: the fact that something rewards som and does not reward earful is not correct if it does click. sent7: if that something is a kind of a hob and it is an absorber does not hold then it does not reward earful. sent8: if the fact that the fiddlehead does reward paleocerebellum but it does not reward som is not true then it does wind. sent9: the rambler does not peg honeymoon if the planet peg honeymoon and it does reward earful. sent10: the fact that the planet rewards earful hold if that the subject does reward som but it does not rewards earful is not right. sent11: if the fiddlehead does not reward earful then the fact that it rewards paleocerebellum and does not reward som does not hold. sent12: there exists nothing that is both Cappadocian and a nap. sent13: the aeration is non-Cappadocian if there is something such that the fact that it is non-Cappadocian and it naps is not true. sent14: that the fact that the rambler does peg honeymoon hold if the rambler is not Cappadocian or it is a wound or both hold. sent15: that something rewards paleocerebellum and it is a wound does not hold if it is not Cappadocian. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if that the fiddlehead is a hob that is a kind of an absorber is wrong it does not reward earful.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the fiddlehead does not reward earful hold.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the fiddlehead does reward paleocerebellum but it does not reward som is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the fiddlehead does wind is right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the rambler is either not Cappadocian or a wound or both.; int5 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__