the fact that the onness does not occur hold.
sent1: the synclinalness does not occur. sent2: if the Arminian does not occur then the plummeting does not occur. sent3: if the servicing Hammett happens and the xenogeneicness happens then the Arminianness does not occur. sent4: the floriculturalness does not occur and the con does not occur if the synclinalness does not occur. sent5: that the con does not occur and the specifying Theophrastus does not occur prevents that the onness does not occur. sent6: if the fracturing pooler happens then the specifying Theophrastus does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the investment occurs is right then the fact that the freshness happens is right. sent8: the alluvion happens. sent9: if the alluvion occurs the servicing Hammett occurs but the revision does not occur. sent10: that the unawareness does not occur and the fracturing pooler does not occur is false if the teleporting does not occur. sent11: if the expulsion happens then the specifying Theophrastus does not occur. sent12: if the refacing lanolin occurs the investment occurs. sent13: the expulsion prevents that the specifying Theophrastus does not occur. sent14: the expulsion occurs or the fracturing pooler occurs or both if the unawareness does not occur. sent15: that the abdicating does not occur and the teleporting does not occur is triggered by that the plummeting does not occur. sent16: the xenogeneicness occurs if the freshness occurs. sent17: the unawareness does not occur.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the floriculturalness does not occur and the con does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the con does not occur.; sent14 & sent17 -> int3: either the expulsion occurs or the fracturing pooler occurs or both.; int3 & sent11 & sent6 -> int4: the specifying Theophrastus does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the con does not occur and the specifying Theophrastus does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the onness does not occur.
sent9 & sent8 -> int6: the servicing Hammett occurs but the revision does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the servicing Hammett occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the onness does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the synclinalness does not occur. sent2: if the Arminian does not occur then the plummeting does not occur. sent3: if the servicing Hammett happens and the xenogeneicness happens then the Arminianness does not occur. sent4: the floriculturalness does not occur and the con does not occur if the synclinalness does not occur. sent5: that the con does not occur and the specifying Theophrastus does not occur prevents that the onness does not occur. sent6: if the fracturing pooler happens then the specifying Theophrastus does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the investment occurs is right then the fact that the freshness happens is right. sent8: the alluvion happens. sent9: if the alluvion occurs the servicing Hammett occurs but the revision does not occur. sent10: that the unawareness does not occur and the fracturing pooler does not occur is false if the teleporting does not occur. sent11: if the expulsion happens then the specifying Theophrastus does not occur. sent12: if the refacing lanolin occurs the investment occurs. sent13: the expulsion prevents that the specifying Theophrastus does not occur. sent14: the expulsion occurs or the fracturing pooler occurs or both if the unawareness does not occur. sent15: that the abdicating does not occur and the teleporting does not occur is triggered by that the plummeting does not occur. sent16: the xenogeneicness occurs if the freshness occurs. sent17: the unawareness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the floriculturalness does not occur and the con does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the con does not occur.; sent14 & sent17 -> int3: either the expulsion occurs or the fracturing pooler occurs or both.; int3 & sent11 & sent6 -> int4: the specifying Theophrastus does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the con does not occur and the specifying Theophrastus does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__