the broadsword vents atheism.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it does decelerate and it is non-oleophilic is not true. sent2: the burthen decoys copartnership. sent3: the fact that the borer is a rental and is not a mesoderm does not hold. sent4: if that the borer is a pronator is correct the broadsword vents atheism. sent5: if something does not decoy Dictaphone and vents dutifulness then it does sterilize guanaco. sent6: if something that is not a mesoderm does not foal blotch then it is a pronator. sent7: something is a mesoderm if the fact that it is a rental and it is not a mesoderm is wrong. sent8: there exists something such that it is a pronator. sent9: the saleratus is baccate if the burthen does sterilize czarina. sent10: the burthen sterilizes czarina if it decoys copartnership. sent11: if something is a blow it is an incidental. sent12: there exists something such that it does decelerate and is not oleophilic. sent13: the borer is not a kind of a mesoderm if something that foals blotch is a kind of a pronator. sent14: if the fact that something does sterilize guanaco is right then it is a kind of a blow. sent15: everything is a dextrorotation that does vent dutifulness. sent16: if something does not foal blotch the fact that it does not vent atheism is true. sent17: the fact that the borer is a rental and it is a mesoderm is not right. sent18: something is not a mesoderm and it does not foal blotch if it vents Libby. sent19: if there are baccate things the bowls does not decoy Dictaphone. sent20: if something is incidental then that it is not a rental and it is not legislative is false. sent21: there is something such that it does foal blotch. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that it does decelerate and it is not oleophilic is not correct the broadsword is a pronator. sent23: if the fact that the broadsword is a mesoderm but it is not a pronator does not hold it is a pronator. sent24: if there exists something such that it is oleophilic the broadsword is a pronator.
sent1 & sent22 -> int1: the broadsword is a pronator.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadsword does foal blotch.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the broadsword does foal blotch and is a pronator.; int2 -> int3: something foals blotch and it is a pronator.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the borer is not a mesoderm.; sent7 -> int5: the borer is a mesoderm if that it is rental and it is not a kind of a mesoderm is incorrect.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the borer is a mesoderm.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the broadsword does not foal blotch.; sent16 -> int9: if that the broadsword does not foal blotch is true it does not vent atheism.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the broadsword vents atheism.
sent6 -> int10: the borer is a pronator if it is not a mesoderm and does not foal blotch.; sent18 -> int11: the borer is not a kind of a mesoderm and does not foal blotch if it vents Libby.; sent20 -> int12: the fact that the bowls is not a rental and it is not legislative is wrong if it is an incidental.; sent11 -> int13: if the bowls is a blow then the fact that it is an incidental is not wrong.; sent14 -> int14: the bowls does blow if that it does sterilize guanaco hold.; sent5 -> int15: that the bowls sterilizes guanaco hold if it does not decoy Dictaphone and it vents dutifulness.; sent10 & sent2 -> int16: the burthen does sterilize czarina.; sent9 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the saleratus is baccate is not false.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it is baccate.; int18 & sent19 -> int19: the bowls does not decoy Dictaphone.; sent15 -> int20: the bowls is a dextrorotation and it does vent dutifulness.; int20 -> int21: the bowls does vent dutifulness.; int19 & int21 -> int22: the bowls does not decoy Dictaphone and vents dutifulness.; int15 & int22 -> int23: that the bowls sterilizes guanaco is right.; int14 & int23 -> int24: the bowls blows.; int13 & int24 -> int25: the bowls is a kind of an incidental.; int12 & int25 -> int26: that the bowls is non-rental thing that is not legislative is not correct.; int26 -> int27: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a rental and not legislative is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the broadsword vents atheism. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it does decelerate and it is non-oleophilic is not true. sent2: the burthen decoys copartnership. sent3: the fact that the borer is a rental and is not a mesoderm does not hold. sent4: if that the borer is a pronator is correct the broadsword vents atheism. sent5: if something does not decoy Dictaphone and vents dutifulness then it does sterilize guanaco. sent6: if something that is not a mesoderm does not foal blotch then it is a pronator. sent7: something is a mesoderm if the fact that it is a rental and it is not a mesoderm is wrong. sent8: there exists something such that it is a pronator. sent9: the saleratus is baccate if the burthen does sterilize czarina. sent10: the burthen sterilizes czarina if it decoys copartnership. sent11: if something is a blow it is an incidental. sent12: there exists something such that it does decelerate and is not oleophilic. sent13: the borer is not a kind of a mesoderm if something that foals blotch is a kind of a pronator. sent14: if the fact that something does sterilize guanaco is right then it is a kind of a blow. sent15: everything is a dextrorotation that does vent dutifulness. sent16: if something does not foal blotch the fact that it does not vent atheism is true. sent17: the fact that the borer is a rental and it is a mesoderm is not right. sent18: something is not a mesoderm and it does not foal blotch if it vents Libby. sent19: if there are baccate things the bowls does not decoy Dictaphone. sent20: if something is incidental then that it is not a rental and it is not legislative is false. sent21: there is something such that it does foal blotch. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that it does decelerate and it is not oleophilic is not correct the broadsword is a pronator. sent23: if the fact that the broadsword is a mesoderm but it is not a pronator does not hold it is a pronator. sent24: if there exists something such that it is oleophilic the broadsword is a pronator. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent22 -> int1: the broadsword is a pronator.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadsword does foal blotch.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the broadsword does foal blotch and is a pronator.; int2 -> int3: something foals blotch and it is a pronator.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the borer is not a mesoderm.; sent7 -> int5: the borer is a mesoderm if that it is rental and it is not a kind of a mesoderm is incorrect.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the borer is a mesoderm.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the broadsword does not foal blotch.; sent16 -> int9: if that the broadsword does not foal blotch is true it does not vent atheism.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__