the fact that the monarch is cyanobacterial is correct.
sent1: that the Aquarius is high-resolution is right if that either the dalesman fishes footwear or it is not noncausative or both is not right. sent2: the Aquarius is a kind of a socialite. sent3: the footwear does ensconce compound if that either the Aquarius does recline destiny or it is not high-resolution or both is false. sent4: that the dalesman fishes footwear and/or is not noncausative is false. sent5: if something is cyclopean it is cyanobacterial. sent6: if the footwear ensconces compound the monarch is cyclopean. sent7: the dalesman does not ensconce compound. sent8: if something is high-resolution and is uncared-for then it is not a socialite. sent9: the fact that the footwear is not uncared-for or reclines destiny or both is false if the Aquarius is not uncared-for.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the Aquarius is high-resolution.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Aquarius is uncared-for.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Aquarius is high-resolution and not cared-for.; sent8 -> int3: if the Aquarius is high-resolution thing that is uncared-for it is not a socialite.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Aquarius is not a socialite.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Aquarius is not uncared-for.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the footwear is not uncared-for and/or reclines destiny does not hold.; sent5 -> int8: if that the monarch is cyclopean is right then it is cyanobacterial.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the monarch is cyanobacterial is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Aquarius is high-resolution is right if that either the dalesman fishes footwear or it is not noncausative or both is not right. sent2: the Aquarius is a kind of a socialite. sent3: the footwear does ensconce compound if that either the Aquarius does recline destiny or it is not high-resolution or both is false. sent4: that the dalesman fishes footwear and/or is not noncausative is false. sent5: if something is cyclopean it is cyanobacterial. sent6: if the footwear ensconces compound the monarch is cyclopean. sent7: the dalesman does not ensconce compound. sent8: if something is high-resolution and is uncared-for then it is not a socialite. sent9: the fact that the footwear is not uncared-for or reclines destiny or both is false if the Aquarius is not uncared-for. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the Aquarius is high-resolution.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Aquarius is uncared-for.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Aquarius is high-resolution and not cared-for.; sent8 -> int3: if the Aquarius is high-resolution thing that is uncared-for it is not a socialite.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Aquarius is not a socialite.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Aquarius is not uncared-for.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the footwear is not uncared-for and/or reclines destiny does not hold.; sent5 -> int8: if that the monarch is cyclopean is right then it is cyanobacterial.; __UNKNOWN__