that the silversmith is not latinate but it is a Potorous is incorrect.
sent1: if the elution is not a kind of a Maugham it is not a kind of a Potorous. sent2: the silversmith is a sandfish. sent3: if the elution is not latinate it is not a sandfish. sent4: if something that does not differentiate is a denture then it is an oblivion. sent5: the silversmith tweets unrest. sent6: the silversmith is not an oblivion. sent7: the pin-up is a kind of a denture if it is both not a communication and electromechanical. sent8: the silversmith does not differentiate if the elution does tweet unrest or it is a sandfish or both. sent9: the fact that either the elution does tweet unrest or it is a sandfish or both is true. sent10: the silversmith is both non-latinate and a Potorous if the fact that it is not a kind of a denture is correct.
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the silversmith does not differentiate hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the silversmith is a denture.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the silversmith does not differentiate and is a kind of a denture.; sent4 -> int3: the silversmith is a kind of an oblivion if that it does not differentiate and is a denture is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the silversmith is an oblivion.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the silversmith is not a denture.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the silversmith is not latinate but it is a Potorous is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the elution is not a kind of a Maugham it is not a kind of a Potorous. sent2: the silversmith is a sandfish. sent3: if the elution is not latinate it is not a sandfish. sent4: if something that does not differentiate is a denture then it is an oblivion. sent5: the silversmith tweets unrest. sent6: the silversmith is not an oblivion. sent7: the pin-up is a kind of a denture if it is both not a communication and electromechanical. sent8: the silversmith does not differentiate if the elution does tweet unrest or it is a sandfish or both. sent9: the fact that either the elution does tweet unrest or it is a sandfish or both is true. sent10: the silversmith is both non-latinate and a Potorous if the fact that it is not a kind of a denture is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the silversmith does not differentiate hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the silversmith is a denture.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the silversmith does not differentiate and is a kind of a denture.; sent4 -> int3: the silversmith is a kind of an oblivion if that it does not differentiate and is a denture is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the silversmith is an oblivion.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the silversmith is not a denture.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__