the fact that the acidoticness happens hold.
sent1: the damnation does not occur. sent2: if that the fact that the undressing midazolam or the variolation or both occurs is incorrect is correct then the episcopalness does not occur. sent3: that the Anglophilicness does not occur hold if the battering occurs. sent4: the episcopalness does not occur if that the undressing midazolam occurs and/or the variolation does not occur is incorrect. sent5: if the bopping self-expression happens the fact that the episcopalness does not occur and the appearance does not occur is wrong. sent6: if the undressing buckboard does not occur then the acidoticness does not occur. sent7: both the bopping self-expression and the ringing happens. sent8: if that the undressing buckboard happens but the integration does not occur is incorrect then the acidoticness does not occur. sent9: that the integration does not occur is prevented by that the ringing happens but the postnatalness does not occur. sent10: the ringing happens and the graphicsness occurs if the damnation does not occur. sent11: that the Anglophilicness occurs and the battering does not occur is triggered by that the undressing buckboard does not occur. sent12: either that the appearance happens or that the battering occurs or both results in the non-Anglophilicness. sent13: the variolation happens. sent14: the fact that the undressing buckboard happens but the integration does not occur is wrong if that the Anglophilicness does not occur is right. sent15: the fact that either the undressing midazolam happens or the variolation does not occur or both is wrong. sent16: that that not the bopping self-expression but the undressing buckboard happens hold is incorrect if the integration occurs. sent17: the ringing happens. sent18: if the episcopalness occurs not the appearance but the acidoticness happens.
sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the episcopalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appearance does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the episcopalness does not occur and the appearance does not occur.; sent7 -> int3: the fact that the bopping self-expression occurs is not wrong.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the episcopalness does not occur and the appearance does not occur is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the appearance occurs.; int6 -> int7: the appearance and/or the battering happens.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the Anglophilicness does not occur.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the fact that that the undressing buckboard but not the integration occurs is false is correct.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the acidoticness happens.
sent10 & sent1 -> int10: the ringing happens and the graphics occurs.; int10 -> int11: the ringing occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the acidoticness happens hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the damnation does not occur. sent2: if that the fact that the undressing midazolam or the variolation or both occurs is incorrect is correct then the episcopalness does not occur. sent3: that the Anglophilicness does not occur hold if the battering occurs. sent4: the episcopalness does not occur if that the undressing midazolam occurs and/or the variolation does not occur is incorrect. sent5: if the bopping self-expression happens the fact that the episcopalness does not occur and the appearance does not occur is wrong. sent6: if the undressing buckboard does not occur then the acidoticness does not occur. sent7: both the bopping self-expression and the ringing happens. sent8: if that the undressing buckboard happens but the integration does not occur is incorrect then the acidoticness does not occur. sent9: that the integration does not occur is prevented by that the ringing happens but the postnatalness does not occur. sent10: the ringing happens and the graphicsness occurs if the damnation does not occur. sent11: that the Anglophilicness occurs and the battering does not occur is triggered by that the undressing buckboard does not occur. sent12: either that the appearance happens or that the battering occurs or both results in the non-Anglophilicness. sent13: the variolation happens. sent14: the fact that the undressing buckboard happens but the integration does not occur is wrong if that the Anglophilicness does not occur is right. sent15: the fact that either the undressing midazolam happens or the variolation does not occur or both is wrong. sent16: that that not the bopping self-expression but the undressing buckboard happens hold is incorrect if the integration occurs. sent17: the ringing happens. sent18: if the episcopalness occurs not the appearance but the acidoticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the episcopalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the appearance does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the episcopalness does not occur and the appearance does not occur.; sent7 -> int3: the fact that the bopping self-expression occurs is not wrong.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the episcopalness does not occur and the appearance does not occur is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the appearance occurs.; int6 -> int7: the appearance and/or the battering happens.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the Anglophilicness does not occur.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the fact that that the undressing buckboard but not the integration occurs is false is correct.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__