the fact that there is something such that if it is a Aachen then it is not calycular and it is not chromatographic is wrong.
sent1: something is a alidade and a Nicosia if it is not calycular. sent2: that the scaffolding is not explicable and is chromatographic is false if the abdominal pants. sent3: if there is something such that it is calycular and it suffers caw then the scaffolding does not pant. sent4: if a calycular thing is a Aachen the fact that the abortifacient does not house wpm is true. sent5: there is something such that if it houses speleology it is not a kind of an explosive. sent6: the abdominal is a kind of a pant that suffers caw. sent7: something is not explicable if the fact that it does not suffer caw and is explicable is false. sent8: something is not chromatographic if the fact that it is not explicable and is chromatographic is false. sent9: if the scaffolding is a Diplopterygium then the fact that the abortifacient is not a pant but explicable is not correct. sent10: if the scaffolding is a pant then the fact that the abortifacient is not calycular but a Diplopterygium is incorrect. sent11: the abortifacient is a kind of a Diplopterygium and does house wpm. sent12: the abortifacient is Socratic and houses Leon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scaffolding is calycular.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scaffolding is a Aachen.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the scaffolding is calycular and it is a kind of a Aachen.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of calycular thing that is a Aachen.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the abortifacient does not house wpm.; sent11 -> int4: the abortifacient does house wpm.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the scaffolding is not calycular.; sent8 -> int7: the scaffolding is non-chromatographic if the fact that it is not explicable but non-chromatographic is not true.; sent6 -> int8: the abdominal pants.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: that the scaffolding is inexplicable thing that is chromatographic is not right.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the scaffolding is not chromatographic.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the scaffolding is both not calycular and non-chromatographic.; [assump2] & int11 -> int12: the scaffolding is not calycular and it is not chromatographic if it is a Aachen.; int12 -> hypothesis;
the hydralazine is a alidade and a Nicosia.
sent1 -> int13: if the fact that the hydralazine is not calycular is right then it is a kind of a alidade and it is a kind of a Nicosia.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a Aachen then it is not calycular and it is not chromatographic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a alidade and a Nicosia if it is not calycular. sent2: that the scaffolding is not explicable and is chromatographic is false if the abdominal pants. sent3: if there is something such that it is calycular and it suffers caw then the scaffolding does not pant. sent4: if a calycular thing is a Aachen the fact that the abortifacient does not house wpm is true. sent5: there is something such that if it houses speleology it is not a kind of an explosive. sent6: the abdominal is a kind of a pant that suffers caw. sent7: something is not explicable if the fact that it does not suffer caw and is explicable is false. sent8: something is not chromatographic if the fact that it is not explicable and is chromatographic is false. sent9: if the scaffolding is a Diplopterygium then the fact that the abortifacient is not a pant but explicable is not correct. sent10: if the scaffolding is a pant then the fact that the abortifacient is not calycular but a Diplopterygium is incorrect. sent11: the abortifacient is a kind of a Diplopterygium and does house wpm. sent12: the abortifacient is Socratic and houses Leon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scaffolding is calycular.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scaffolding is a Aachen.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the scaffolding is calycular and it is a kind of a Aachen.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of calycular thing that is a Aachen.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the abortifacient does not house wpm.; sent11 -> int4: the abortifacient does house wpm.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the scaffolding is not calycular.; sent8 -> int7: the scaffolding is non-chromatographic if the fact that it is not explicable but non-chromatographic is not true.; sent6 -> int8: the abdominal pants.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: that the scaffolding is inexplicable thing that is chromatographic is not right.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the scaffolding is not chromatographic.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the scaffolding is both not calycular and non-chromatographic.; [assump2] & int11 -> int12: the scaffolding is not calycular and it is not chromatographic if it is a Aachen.; int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__