there is something such that if the fact that it is not a linocut and it is a kind of a trance does not hold the fact that it does not defibrillate rennet is not wrong.
sent1: if the fact that something is not a linocut and is a trance is incorrect it does defibrillate rennet. sent2: if that something is not a kind of a linocut but it is a trance is not right it does not defibrillate rennet. sent3: that there exists something such that if that it is a linocut and is a trance is incorrect then it does not defibrillate rennet is not incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it does not unmake enzymology and it unmakes spongefly then it is not a sensuality. sent5: if that something is both a linocut and a trance is false then it does not defibrillate rennet.
sent2 -> int1: the spongefly does not defibrillate rennet if the fact that it is not a kind of a linocut and it is a trance is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is not a linocut and it is a kind of a trance does not hold the fact that it does not defibrillate rennet is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not a linocut and is a trance is incorrect it does defibrillate rennet. sent2: if that something is not a kind of a linocut but it is a trance is not right it does not defibrillate rennet. sent3: that there exists something such that if that it is a linocut and is a trance is incorrect then it does not defibrillate rennet is not incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it does not unmake enzymology and it unmakes spongefly then it is not a sensuality. sent5: if that something is both a linocut and a trance is false then it does not defibrillate rennet. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the spongefly does not defibrillate rennet if the fact that it is not a kind of a linocut and it is a trance is false.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__