the silverspot is not evidentiary.
sent1: that the fugitive does destalinize exposed hold if the fact that the ciliate is not a Fentanyl and does not destalinize exposed is not correct. sent2: the fact that that the tanker is a blackout is correct if the fact that the cleaner is connate is not incorrect hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is pyrotechnics the cleaner is connate. sent4: something is not evidentiary if the fact that it is either not a blackout or a Chlorophthalmidae or both is not right. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is connate but not a Boise is not true. sent6: the albatross is not connate. sent7: the silverspot is a kind of a blackout. sent8: the silverspot is a blackout if the tanker is a blackout. sent9: the fact that the silverspot is not a wagoner is not false. sent10: something is not evidentiary if the fact that it is a blackout and/or is a Chlorophthalmidae is not right. sent11: the fact that the blusher is a Boise and pyrotechnics is not true. sent12: if the cleaner is not a blackout then the silverspot is evidentiary and it is connate. sent13: that the tanker either is not a kind of a bootlegging or is a Chimborazo or both is not correct if the cleaner is not connate. sent14: something is a blackout if it is not a Chlorophthalmidae. sent15: something is connate or not evidentiary or both if it is a blackout. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Boise and it is pyrotechnics is not correct. sent17: if the tanker is a blackout then that either the silverspot is not a blackout or it is a kind of a Chlorophthalmidae or both is wrong. sent18: if the fugitive does destalinize exposed then the albatross is a kind of a Muscovite. sent19: if there is something such that that it is a Boise and it is not pyrotechnics does not hold then the cleaner is connate. sent20: there exists nothing such that the fact that it is a Boise and it is pyrotechnics hold. sent21: there exists nothing that is a kind of a Boise that is not pyrotechnics. sent22: if there is something such that it is Muscovite then the shirtsleeve is not sidearm and protests Mott. sent23: if the fact that either the silverspot is a kind of a blackout or it is a Chlorophthalmidae or both is false then it is not evidentiary. sent24: the fact that the ciliate is not a kind of a Fentanyl and it does not destalinize exposed does not hold.
sent21 -> int1: that the blusher is a Boise but it is non-pyrotechnics is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Boise that is not pyrotechnics does not hold.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the cleaner is connate.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the tanker is a blackout is not incorrect.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the silverspot is not a blackout and/or it is a Chlorophthalmidae does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: the silverspot is not evidentiary if that it is not a kind of a blackout and/or it is a Chlorophthalmidae does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the silverspot is evidentiary.
$hypothesis$ = the silverspot is not evidentiary. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fugitive does destalinize exposed hold if the fact that the ciliate is not a Fentanyl and does not destalinize exposed is not correct. sent2: the fact that that the tanker is a blackout is correct if the fact that the cleaner is connate is not incorrect hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is pyrotechnics the cleaner is connate. sent4: something is not evidentiary if the fact that it is either not a blackout or a Chlorophthalmidae or both is not right. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is connate but not a Boise is not true. sent6: the albatross is not connate. sent7: the silverspot is a kind of a blackout. sent8: the silverspot is a blackout if the tanker is a blackout. sent9: the fact that the silverspot is not a wagoner is not false. sent10: something is not evidentiary if the fact that it is a blackout and/or is a Chlorophthalmidae is not right. sent11: the fact that the blusher is a Boise and pyrotechnics is not true. sent12: if the cleaner is not a blackout then the silverspot is evidentiary and it is connate. sent13: that the tanker either is not a kind of a bootlegging or is a Chimborazo or both is not correct if the cleaner is not connate. sent14: something is a blackout if it is not a Chlorophthalmidae. sent15: something is connate or not evidentiary or both if it is a blackout. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Boise and it is pyrotechnics is not correct. sent17: if the tanker is a blackout then that either the silverspot is not a blackout or it is a kind of a Chlorophthalmidae or both is wrong. sent18: if the fugitive does destalinize exposed then the albatross is a kind of a Muscovite. sent19: if there is something such that that it is a Boise and it is not pyrotechnics does not hold then the cleaner is connate. sent20: there exists nothing such that the fact that it is a Boise and it is pyrotechnics hold. sent21: there exists nothing that is a kind of a Boise that is not pyrotechnics. sent22: if there is something such that it is Muscovite then the shirtsleeve is not sidearm and protests Mott. sent23: if the fact that either the silverspot is a kind of a blackout or it is a Chlorophthalmidae or both is false then it is not evidentiary. sent24: the fact that the ciliate is not a kind of a Fentanyl and it does not destalinize exposed does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: that the blusher is a Boise but it is non-pyrotechnics is not right.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Boise that is not pyrotechnics does not hold.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the cleaner is connate.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the tanker is a blackout is not incorrect.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the fact that the silverspot is not a blackout and/or it is a Chlorophthalmidae does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: the silverspot is not evidentiary if that it is not a kind of a blackout and/or it is a Chlorophthalmidae does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__