the Grenadian does culture Bishkek.
sent1: if the tissue is not a wrench that the ruin does not wrench is true. sent2: the ratite is a kind of acute thing that does culture tenter. sent3: if the ratite is acute and it does culture tenter it does not feint. sent4: if the ruin is a wrench and it colors Mendelism then the peahen greens electrosleep. sent5: the ratite is not a wrench. sent6: the tissue is an acute if the ratite does not wrench. sent7: that the Lama does not wrench or it indexes thrum or both is wrong. sent8: if the fact that the I-beam does not color Mendelism and is a feint hold then the ruin does green electrosleep. sent9: if the peahen does green electrosleep then the I-beam does not green electrosleep. sent10: the ruin is not a wrench and does color Mendelism if the tissue is not a wrench. sent11: the ruin greens electrosleep if the fact that the I-beam does not feint but it is a wrench is not incorrect. sent12: the I-beam does not green electrosleep. sent13: the ruin is not a kind of a wrench. sent14: something does not feint and/or it is not a regress if it is not a wrench. sent15: that the ratite does feint is right if the tissue wrenches. sent16: if the peahen greens electrosleep that the fact that the I-beam is not a regress or greens electrosleep or both is not right is right. sent17: that if that the ruin does color Mendelism and it does green electrosleep is incorrect the ratite is not a wrench is true. sent18: the peahen does index pronoun and it is residuary. sent19: if that the I-beam is not a regress and/or does green electrosleep is not correct then that the concessionaire is pompous is right. sent20: the ruin does not regress. sent21: the peahen greens electrosleep if the ruin is not a wrench but it does color Mendelism. sent22: the ratite is not a kind of a wrench if the fact that the ruin does green electrosleep or it does color Mendelism or both does not hold. sent23: the ratite is acute. sent24: if the concessionaire is pompous the Grenadian does culture Bishkek.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the tissue is a wrench is true.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the ratite is a feint.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the ratite is not a feint.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tissue is not a wrench.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the ruin is not a wrench but it colors Mendelism.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the peahen greens electrosleep.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the fact that the I-beam is not a kind of a regress or it greens electrosleep or both does not hold.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the concessionaire is pompous.; int8 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the tissue is not a regress.
sent14 -> int9: either the ratite is not a feint or it does not regress or both if that it is not a kind of a wrench is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the Grenadian does culture Bishkek. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tissue is not a wrench that the ruin does not wrench is true. sent2: the ratite is a kind of acute thing that does culture tenter. sent3: if the ratite is acute and it does culture tenter it does not feint. sent4: if the ruin is a wrench and it colors Mendelism then the peahen greens electrosleep. sent5: the ratite is not a wrench. sent6: the tissue is an acute if the ratite does not wrench. sent7: that the Lama does not wrench or it indexes thrum or both is wrong. sent8: if the fact that the I-beam does not color Mendelism and is a feint hold then the ruin does green electrosleep. sent9: if the peahen does green electrosleep then the I-beam does not green electrosleep. sent10: the ruin is not a wrench and does color Mendelism if the tissue is not a wrench. sent11: the ruin greens electrosleep if the fact that the I-beam does not feint but it is a wrench is not incorrect. sent12: the I-beam does not green electrosleep. sent13: the ruin is not a kind of a wrench. sent14: something does not feint and/or it is not a regress if it is not a wrench. sent15: that the ratite does feint is right if the tissue wrenches. sent16: if the peahen greens electrosleep that the fact that the I-beam is not a regress or greens electrosleep or both is not right is right. sent17: that if that the ruin does color Mendelism and it does green electrosleep is incorrect the ratite is not a wrench is true. sent18: the peahen does index pronoun and it is residuary. sent19: if that the I-beam is not a regress and/or does green electrosleep is not correct then that the concessionaire is pompous is right. sent20: the ruin does not regress. sent21: the peahen greens electrosleep if the ruin is not a wrench but it does color Mendelism. sent22: the ratite is not a kind of a wrench if the fact that the ruin does green electrosleep or it does color Mendelism or both does not hold. sent23: the ratite is acute. sent24: if the concessionaire is pompous the Grenadian does culture Bishkek. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the tissue is a wrench is true.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the ratite is a feint.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the ratite is not a feint.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tissue is not a wrench.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the ruin is not a wrench but it colors Mendelism.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the peahen greens electrosleep.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the fact that the I-beam is not a kind of a regress or it greens electrosleep or both does not hold.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the concessionaire is pompous.; int8 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__