the fact that either the perfecter is not a kind of a Alaskan or it is not unfathomable or both does not hold.
sent1: if the Mosaic is a counteroffer then the perfecter does outshout lastingness. sent2: the perfecter is a kind of a Alaskan and/or it is not unfathomable. sent3: the perfecter is a Alaskan. sent4: that the Mosaic is a stickleback but it is not a counteroffer is correct if the clarinet does not outshout lastingness. sent5: if the perfecter either is not Alaskan or is not unfathomable or both then it is not a kind of a counteroffer. sent6: if something is not informational it does outshout Cotula and it does not outshout lastingness. sent7: the mako is a counteroffer. sent8: the dessert does not outshout lastingness. sent9: if the Mosaic is a kind of a counteroffer then the perfecter is a counteroffer. sent10: the perfecter is not a Alaskan and/or it is not unfathomable if the Mosaic is a kind of a stickleback. sent11: the Mosaic is a counteroffer and/or unfathomable. sent12: the Manchu is not informational if the triphammer is not other. sent13: if the fact that the fetoscope is a disappearance or it teaches metric or both is wrong then the triphammer is not other. sent14: something is not informational if that it is informational and it is worldly does not hold. sent15: the lean-to does teach barrator if it is vegetal. sent16: the perfecter is not a kind of a counteroffer if the fact that it is not a Alaskan is correct. sent17: if there is something such that it teaches barrator then the fact that that either the fetoscope is a kind of a disappearance or it does teach metric or both is incorrect is right. sent18: if the fact that the Mosaic does outshout lastingness is not incorrect the perfecter is a counteroffer. sent19: the Mosaic outshouts lastingness and/or is a counteroffer. sent20: the lean-to is not non-vegetal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perfecter is non-Alaskan and/or it is not unfathomable.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the perfecter is not a kind of a counteroffer.; sent19 & sent18 & sent9 -> int2: the perfecter is a kind of a counteroffer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the perfecter is not a Alaskan or is not unfathomable or both.
sent6 -> int4: if the clarinet is not informational it does outshout Cotula and does not outshout lastingness.; sent14 -> int5: if the fact that the clarinet is informational and worldly is false then it is not informational.; sent15 & sent20 -> int6: the lean-to teaches barrator.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does teach barrator.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: that the fetoscope is a disappearance and/or it teaches metric is not correct.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the triphammer is not other.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: that the Manchu is not informational hold.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not informational.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the perfecter is not a kind of a Alaskan or it is not unfathomable or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Mosaic is a counteroffer then the perfecter does outshout lastingness. sent2: the perfecter is a kind of a Alaskan and/or it is not unfathomable. sent3: the perfecter is a Alaskan. sent4: that the Mosaic is a stickleback but it is not a counteroffer is correct if the clarinet does not outshout lastingness. sent5: if the perfecter either is not Alaskan or is not unfathomable or both then it is not a kind of a counteroffer. sent6: if something is not informational it does outshout Cotula and it does not outshout lastingness. sent7: the mako is a counteroffer. sent8: the dessert does not outshout lastingness. sent9: if the Mosaic is a kind of a counteroffer then the perfecter is a counteroffer. sent10: the perfecter is not a Alaskan and/or it is not unfathomable if the Mosaic is a kind of a stickleback. sent11: the Mosaic is a counteroffer and/or unfathomable. sent12: the Manchu is not informational if the triphammer is not other. sent13: if the fact that the fetoscope is a disappearance or it teaches metric or both is wrong then the triphammer is not other. sent14: something is not informational if that it is informational and it is worldly does not hold. sent15: the lean-to does teach barrator if it is vegetal. sent16: the perfecter is not a kind of a counteroffer if the fact that it is not a Alaskan is correct. sent17: if there is something such that it teaches barrator then the fact that that either the fetoscope is a kind of a disappearance or it does teach metric or both is incorrect is right. sent18: if the fact that the Mosaic does outshout lastingness is not incorrect the perfecter is a counteroffer. sent19: the Mosaic outshouts lastingness and/or is a counteroffer. sent20: the lean-to is not non-vegetal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perfecter is non-Alaskan and/or it is not unfathomable.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the perfecter is not a kind of a counteroffer.; sent19 & sent18 & sent9 -> int2: the perfecter is a kind of a counteroffer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__