the fact that the astatine outshouts Christology but it is not a tempter does not hold.
sent1: if there is something such that it is Carolingian and it is statesmanlike then the Creation is not a Intelnet. sent2: the astatine does outshout Cochlearius. sent3: the fact that something outshouts Christology and is not a tempter is false if it is not a kind of a Carolingian. sent4: the armory is statesmanlike. sent5: The Cochlearius does outshout astatine. sent6: the galley does outshout Christology. sent7: the fact that the revolver does outshout epicenter is right. sent8: the fact that the astatine sediments mollycoddle is not false if it does outshout Cochlearius. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a tempter that does not sediment mollycoddle is not correct the fact that the astatine is not a tempter hold. sent10: the astatine is not a Carolingian if it is a kind of a Intelnet. sent11: that something is a tempter but it does not sediment mollycoddle is not true if it is chiromantic. sent12: everything is chiromantic and it is infinitival. sent13: the armory is a Carolingian if something outshouts epicenter.
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: that the astatine sediments mollycoddle is right.; int1 -> int2: the astatine sediments mollycoddle or it is a Intelnet or both.; sent3 -> int3: that if the astatine is not the Carolingian the fact that the astatine does outshout Christology and is not a tempter is false is true.;
the astatine does outshout Christology and is not a tempter.
sent12 -> int4: the marketplace is chiromantic and it is infinitival.; int4 -> int5: the marketplace is chiromantic.; int5 -> int6: everything is chiromantic.; int6 -> int7: the Epistle is chiromantic.; sent11 -> int8: if the Epistle is chiromantic then the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a tempter and it does not sediment mollycoddle is not wrong does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the Epistle is a tempter that does not sediment mollycoddle does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a tempter and does not sediment mollycoddle.; int10 -> int11: that the probe is a tempter but it does not sediment mollycoddle is incorrect.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is a kind of a tempter and it does not sediment mollycoddle is not true.; int12 & sent9 -> int13: the astatine is not a tempter.; sent7 -> int14: something outshouts epicenter.; sent13 & int14 -> int15: the armory is a kind of a Carolingian.; sent4 & int15 -> int16: that the armory is Carolingian and it is statesmanlike is correct.; int16 -> int17: something is a kind of Carolingian thing that is statesmanlike.; sent1 & int17 -> int18: the Creation is not a kind of a Intelnet.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the astatine outshouts Christology but it is not a tempter does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is Carolingian and it is statesmanlike then the Creation is not a Intelnet. sent2: the astatine does outshout Cochlearius. sent3: the fact that something outshouts Christology and is not a tempter is false if it is not a kind of a Carolingian. sent4: the armory is statesmanlike. sent5: The Cochlearius does outshout astatine. sent6: the galley does outshout Christology. sent7: the fact that the revolver does outshout epicenter is right. sent8: the fact that the astatine sediments mollycoddle is not false if it does outshout Cochlearius. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a tempter that does not sediment mollycoddle is not correct the fact that the astatine is not a tempter hold. sent10: the astatine is not a Carolingian if it is a kind of a Intelnet. sent11: that something is a tempter but it does not sediment mollycoddle is not true if it is chiromantic. sent12: everything is chiromantic and it is infinitival. sent13: the armory is a Carolingian if something outshouts epicenter. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: that the astatine sediments mollycoddle is right.; int1 -> int2: the astatine sediments mollycoddle or it is a Intelnet or both.; sent3 -> int3: that if the astatine is not the Carolingian the fact that the astatine does outshout Christology and is not a tempter is false is true.; __UNKNOWN__