there exists something such that if it is not acidotic then the fact that it does not uncloak and does not stifle eucalyptus is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the troublemaker does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus is not correct if it is acidotic. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a soddy the fact that it is not a sunset and is not a apogamy is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not acidotic that it does not uncloak and stifles eucalyptus is not true. sent4: if the troublemaker does not uncloak then the fact that it is not single-lane and it is not a kind of a Carpocapsa is false. sent5: if the troublemaker is not acidotic then it does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus. sent6: the fact that the mezzo-soprano is not a Enhydra and it is not acidotic is not correct if the fact that it does not render snowberry hold. sent7: there is something such that if it does not stoke then that it is not a boast and is not a kind of a whistling is wrong. sent8: if the pasta is not acidotic that it is not shut and it is not a kind of an improvisation does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not milch that it is both not relative and not a arenavirus does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the troublemaker is not a arenavirus is true then the fact that it does not render acervulus and it is not an impossible does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if that it is not millenarian hold then that it is not a HS1 and it is not migratory does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a stingray the fact that it does not remainder call-out and it is not a kind of a completeness is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if the fact that it is acidotic is not right then the fact that it does uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus is not correct. sent14: that the troublemaker uncloaks and does not stifle eucalyptus does not hold if it is not acidotic. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not acidotic it does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus. sent16: if the troublemaker is not acidotic then that it does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus is not right. sent17: that something does not eulogize Dane and is not a kind of a Carpocapsa is not right if it is not a seesaw. sent18: the fact that the troublemaker does not uncloak but it does stifle eucalyptus is false if it is not acidotic. sent19: there is something such that if it is acidotic then that it does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus does not hold.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a seesaw is not wrong the fact that it does not eulogize Dane and it is not a kind of a Carpocapsa does not hold.
sent17 -> int1: if the geophysicist is not a seesaw that it does not eulogize Dane and is not a kind of a Carpocapsa is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not acidotic then the fact that it does not uncloak and does not stifle eucalyptus is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the troublemaker does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus is not correct if it is acidotic. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a soddy the fact that it is not a sunset and is not a apogamy is not right. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not acidotic that it does not uncloak and stifles eucalyptus is not true. sent4: if the troublemaker does not uncloak then the fact that it is not single-lane and it is not a kind of a Carpocapsa is false. sent5: if the troublemaker is not acidotic then it does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus. sent6: the fact that the mezzo-soprano is not a Enhydra and it is not acidotic is not correct if the fact that it does not render snowberry hold. sent7: there is something such that if it does not stoke then that it is not a boast and is not a kind of a whistling is wrong. sent8: if the pasta is not acidotic that it is not shut and it is not a kind of an improvisation does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not milch that it is both not relative and not a arenavirus does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the troublemaker is not a arenavirus is true then the fact that it does not render acervulus and it is not an impossible does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if that it is not millenarian hold then that it is not a HS1 and it is not migratory does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a stingray the fact that it does not remainder call-out and it is not a kind of a completeness is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if the fact that it is acidotic is not right then the fact that it does uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus is not correct. sent14: that the troublemaker uncloaks and does not stifle eucalyptus does not hold if it is not acidotic. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not acidotic it does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus. sent16: if the troublemaker is not acidotic then that it does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus is not right. sent17: that something does not eulogize Dane and is not a kind of a Carpocapsa is not right if it is not a seesaw. sent18: the fact that the troublemaker does not uncloak but it does stifle eucalyptus is false if it is not acidotic. sent19: there is something such that if it is acidotic then that it does not uncloak and it does not stifle eucalyptus does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__