that the cephalometry does not occur but the reportableness happens if the pitying crapshoot occurs is not right.
sent1: if the fact that the concentricness happens is correct the cannibalism does not occur or the fathoming does not occur or both. sent2: the modulating and the concentricness happens. sent3: if that the singling chasm happens is right then that both the non-inactiveness and the swapping industrialist happens is not true. sent4: if the fact that the espionage and the oleaceousness occurs is not true then the oleaceousness does not occur. sent5: if the oleaceousness does not occur then the swapping Menuhin occurs and the damnation happens. sent6: if the swapping Menuhin happens the singling chasm happens. sent7: that the inactiveness occurs and the reportableness happens hold. sent8: if the singling foresail does not occur then that the espionage and the oleaceousness happens is incorrect. sent9: the equating happens if the pitying crapshoot does not occur. sent10: the precordialness occurs. sent11: the non-precordialness is brought about by that the pitying crapshoot and the cephalometry happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pitying crapshoot occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cephalometry happens.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the pitying crapshoot and the cephalometry happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the precordialness does not occur is correct.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the cephalometry does not occur.; sent7 -> int5: the reportableness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the cephalometry but the reportableness occurs.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the equating happens.
sent2 -> int7: the concentricness occurs.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the cannibalism does not occur and/or the fathom does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cephalometry does not occur but the reportableness happens if the pitying crapshoot occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the concentricness happens is correct the cannibalism does not occur or the fathoming does not occur or both. sent2: the modulating and the concentricness happens. sent3: if that the singling chasm happens is right then that both the non-inactiveness and the swapping industrialist happens is not true. sent4: if the fact that the espionage and the oleaceousness occurs is not true then the oleaceousness does not occur. sent5: if the oleaceousness does not occur then the swapping Menuhin occurs and the damnation happens. sent6: if the swapping Menuhin happens the singling chasm happens. sent7: that the inactiveness occurs and the reportableness happens hold. sent8: if the singling foresail does not occur then that the espionage and the oleaceousness happens is incorrect. sent9: the equating happens if the pitying crapshoot does not occur. sent10: the precordialness occurs. sent11: the non-precordialness is brought about by that the pitying crapshoot and the cephalometry happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pitying crapshoot occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cephalometry happens.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the pitying crapshoot and the cephalometry happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the precordialness does not occur is correct.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the cephalometry does not occur.; sent7 -> int5: the reportableness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the cephalometry but the reportableness occurs.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__