that the summation is nomothetic thing that does not pleat clubfoot is not right.
sent1: the fact that that something is not an enchanter but it does rake stylite is not right if it does birl hold. sent2: everything birls. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not pleat clubfoot and is not synovial does not hold. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not an enchanter and it rakes stylite is incorrect the stylite does rake liked. sent5: if the festoon does not pleat clubfoot then the fact that the wing-nut is synovial thing that does not pleat clubfoot is not right. sent6: if something does not rake borderland that it is not a kind of a testosterone and is not non-prenatal is not correct. sent7: that the wing-nut does not pleat clubfoot if there is something such that the fact that it is not synovial and it is not a damper is not right is true. sent8: if the fact that the hypo is not a ambulacrum and rakes borderland is not right the wing-nut does not rakes borderland. sent9: that the festoon pleats clubfoot and is synovial does not hold. sent10: the fact that the festoon is not synovial and it is not a damper does not hold. sent11: the fact that the hypo is not a ambulacrum but it does rake borderland is wrong if the stylite does rake liked.
sent10 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not synovial and it is not a damper is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the wing-nut does not pleat clubfoot.;
the summation is nomothetic but it does not pleat clubfoot.
sent1 -> int3: if the Sauterne birls then the fact that it is not a kind of an enchanter and rakes stylite is not true.; sent2 -> int4: the Sauterne does birl.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the Sauterne is not an enchanter but it rakes stylite does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists nothing that is not an enchanter and rakes stylite.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the Gujarati is not an enchanter and does rake stylite is wrong.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is not an enchanter and rakes stylite does not hold.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the stylite rakes liked.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the fact that the hypo is not a kind of a ambulacrum and rakes borderland is not true.; sent8 & int10 -> int11: the wing-nut does not rake borderland.; sent6 -> int12: if the wing-nut does not rake borderland then that it is not a testosterone and is prenatal is not true.; int11 & int12 -> int13: that the wing-nut is not a testosterone but it is prenatal does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the summation is nomothetic thing that does not pleat clubfoot is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that something is not an enchanter but it does rake stylite is not right if it does birl hold. sent2: everything birls. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not pleat clubfoot and is not synovial does not hold. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not an enchanter and it rakes stylite is incorrect the stylite does rake liked. sent5: if the festoon does not pleat clubfoot then the fact that the wing-nut is synovial thing that does not pleat clubfoot is not right. sent6: if something does not rake borderland that it is not a kind of a testosterone and is not non-prenatal is not correct. sent7: that the wing-nut does not pleat clubfoot if there is something such that the fact that it is not synovial and it is not a damper is not right is true. sent8: if the fact that the hypo is not a ambulacrum and rakes borderland is not right the wing-nut does not rakes borderland. sent9: that the festoon pleats clubfoot and is synovial does not hold. sent10: the fact that the festoon is not synovial and it is not a damper does not hold. sent11: the fact that the hypo is not a ambulacrum but it does rake borderland is wrong if the stylite does rake liked. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not synovial and it is not a damper is not correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the wing-nut does not pleat clubfoot.; __UNKNOWN__