there exists something such that if it does not grumble antipathy the fact that it is Goethean and it does not manhandle silvex does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it does not dip that it is futuristic and is not a kind of a slattern is incorrect. sent2: if something does not grumble antipathy then it is a kind of Goethean thing that does not manhandle silvex. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not grumble antipathy it is a kind of Goethean thing that does not manhandle silvex. sent4: the fact that something does manhandle kingbird and is not relativistic is wrong if it does not warble. sent5: the fact that something is regretful but it is not a Swift if it is not an adjunct hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not severalize court that it does manhandle infinitesimal and it does not add Champagne does not hold. sent7: if the kingbird is not a hydrophyte then the fact that it is a kind of a Canadian that does not grumble antipathy is wrong. sent8: that something is a kind of Goethean thing that does not manhandle silvex does not hold if it does not grumble antipathy. sent9: that something is servile and is not non-verbal is not right if it is not a kind of a dedication. sent10: that the kingbird is Goethean and it manhandles silvex does not hold if it does not grumble antipathy. sent11: there is something such that if it severalizes ranching then that the fact that it is a Thysanoptera and it does not severalize humiliation is correct is not true. sent12: if something is not a springer then that it grumbles reality and is unimportant does not hold. sent13: the fact that something is Goethean and does not manhandle silvex is not right if it does grumble antipathy. sent14: there is something such that if it does not manhandle coordinated that it manhandles kingbird and it is a palm does not hold. sent15: that something is Goethean and it manhandles silvex is incorrect if it does not grumble antipathy. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not servile the fact that it does warn and is non-inquisitorial is incorrect.
sent8 -> int1: if the kingbird does not grumble antipathy then that it is Goethean and does not manhandle silvex is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not grumble antipathy the fact that it is Goethean and it does not manhandle silvex does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not dip that it is futuristic and is not a kind of a slattern is incorrect. sent2: if something does not grumble antipathy then it is a kind of Goethean thing that does not manhandle silvex. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not grumble antipathy it is a kind of Goethean thing that does not manhandle silvex. sent4: the fact that something does manhandle kingbird and is not relativistic is wrong if it does not warble. sent5: the fact that something is regretful but it is not a Swift if it is not an adjunct hold. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not severalize court that it does manhandle infinitesimal and it does not add Champagne does not hold. sent7: if the kingbird is not a hydrophyte then the fact that it is a kind of a Canadian that does not grumble antipathy is wrong. sent8: that something is a kind of Goethean thing that does not manhandle silvex does not hold if it does not grumble antipathy. sent9: that something is servile and is not non-verbal is not right if it is not a kind of a dedication. sent10: that the kingbird is Goethean and it manhandles silvex does not hold if it does not grumble antipathy. sent11: there is something such that if it severalizes ranching then that the fact that it is a Thysanoptera and it does not severalize humiliation is correct is not true. sent12: if something is not a springer then that it grumbles reality and is unimportant does not hold. sent13: the fact that something is Goethean and does not manhandle silvex is not right if it does grumble antipathy. sent14: there is something such that if it does not manhandle coordinated that it manhandles kingbird and it is a palm does not hold. sent15: that something is Goethean and it manhandles silvex is incorrect if it does not grumble antipathy. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not servile the fact that it does warn and is non-inquisitorial is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the kingbird does not grumble antipathy then that it is Goethean and does not manhandle silvex is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__