the lathering Adonic does not occur.
sent1: that the formula does not occur and/or that the demagogicness occurs is brought about by that the postponement does not occur. sent2: if that the bracteolateness occurs is correct then that either the formula does not occur or the demagogicness happens or both is not right. sent3: that the vocalizing and/or the anaclinalness happens prevents the postponement. sent4: the fact that the lathering epic does not occur is wrong. sent5: the fact that the exculpation occurs is not false. sent6: the second and the bracteolateness occurs. sent7: that the lathering Adonic occurs is brought about by that the vocalizing does not occur or that the cluttering occurs or both. sent8: if that both the non-tonsorialness and the anaclinalness happens is not correct the tonsorialness occurs. sent9: the explicableness and/or that the eviscerating Pyralis happens is brought about by that the heaving does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the vocalizing happens hold.; assump1 -> int1: the vocalizing and/or the anaclinalness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the postponement does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the formula does not occur and/or the demagogicness happens.; sent6 -> int4: the bracteolateness occurs.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the fact that either the formula does not occur or the demagogicness happens or both is false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the vocalizing does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the vocalizing does not occur and/or the clutter happens.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the tonsorialness happens and the questionableness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the lathering Adonic does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the formula does not occur and/or that the demagogicness occurs is brought about by that the postponement does not occur. sent2: if that the bracteolateness occurs is correct then that either the formula does not occur or the demagogicness happens or both is not right. sent3: that the vocalizing and/or the anaclinalness happens prevents the postponement. sent4: the fact that the lathering epic does not occur is wrong. sent5: the fact that the exculpation occurs is not false. sent6: the second and the bracteolateness occurs. sent7: that the lathering Adonic occurs is brought about by that the vocalizing does not occur or that the cluttering occurs or both. sent8: if that both the non-tonsorialness and the anaclinalness happens is not correct the tonsorialness occurs. sent9: the explicableness and/or that the eviscerating Pyralis happens is brought about by that the heaving does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the vocalizing happens hold.; assump1 -> int1: the vocalizing and/or the anaclinalness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the postponement does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the formula does not occur and/or the demagogicness happens.; sent6 -> int4: the bracteolateness occurs.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the fact that either the formula does not occur or the demagogicness happens or both is false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the vocalizing does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the vocalizing does not occur and/or the clutter happens.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__