there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Roridulaceae the fact that it rids Nina and is a Canadian does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a Branchiobdella the fact that it is a duress and it rids nonsteroid is not correct. sent2: the fact that something does rid mayor and it is a rabbitfish is not right if it is not a kind of a Kobe. sent3: the fact that the PX is trihydroxy and it does rid Nina is incorrect if it does not book Solomon's-seal. sent4: the retreatant rids Nina and is a kind of a Canadian if it is not a Roridulaceae. sent5: if the retreatant is a Roridulaceae then that it does rid Nina and it is a kind of a Canadian is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a Roridulaceae hold it does rid Nina and is a Canadian. sent7: there is something such that if it is a Roridulaceae then the fact that it does rid Nina and it is a kind of a Canadian does not hold. sent8: that something is medical and it is a overlip does not hold if it is not oleophobic. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of a ology that does book Grass is false if it is not ministerial. sent10: if something is not a kind of a Roridulaceae that it rids Nina and is a kind of a Canadian is not right. sent11: the fact that something rids Nina and is a Canadian does not hold if it is a kind of a Roridulaceae. sent12: something rids Nina and it is a kind of a Canadian if it is not a Roridulaceae. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not slog aposelene that it is trihydroxy and does strip average is incorrect. sent14: that something is a overlip and stomatal does not hold if it is not a hacker. sent15: the fact that something is a insectivore and is a disinterestedness does not hold if it is not appointive. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a tension the fact that it books bootlegging and is a stonefish is not right. sent17: if the tension is not uninformative then that it immerses and it is entozoic does not hold. sent18: the fact that the retreatant is fibrillose and is a Roridulaceae is not correct if the fact that it is not electrostatics is not false.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the retreatant does rid Nina and it is a Canadian is not true if it is not a Roridulaceae.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Roridulaceae the fact that it rids Nina and is a Canadian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a Branchiobdella the fact that it is a duress and it rids nonsteroid is not correct. sent2: the fact that something does rid mayor and it is a rabbitfish is not right if it is not a kind of a Kobe. sent3: the fact that the PX is trihydroxy and it does rid Nina is incorrect if it does not book Solomon's-seal. sent4: the retreatant rids Nina and is a kind of a Canadian if it is not a Roridulaceae. sent5: if the retreatant is a Roridulaceae then that it does rid Nina and it is a kind of a Canadian is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a Roridulaceae hold it does rid Nina and is a Canadian. sent7: there is something such that if it is a Roridulaceae then the fact that it does rid Nina and it is a kind of a Canadian does not hold. sent8: that something is medical and it is a overlip does not hold if it is not oleophobic. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of a ology that does book Grass is false if it is not ministerial. sent10: if something is not a kind of a Roridulaceae that it rids Nina and is a kind of a Canadian is not right. sent11: the fact that something rids Nina and is a Canadian does not hold if it is a kind of a Roridulaceae. sent12: something rids Nina and it is a kind of a Canadian if it is not a Roridulaceae. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not slog aposelene that it is trihydroxy and does strip average is incorrect. sent14: that something is a overlip and stomatal does not hold if it is not a hacker. sent15: the fact that something is a insectivore and is a disinterestedness does not hold if it is not appointive. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a tension the fact that it books bootlegging and is a stonefish is not right. sent17: if the tension is not uninformative then that it immerses and it is entozoic does not hold. sent18: the fact that the retreatant is fibrillose and is a Roridulaceae is not correct if the fact that it is not electrostatics is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the retreatant does rid Nina and it is a Canadian is not true if it is not a Roridulaceae.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__