the bacchanal does not occur.
sent1: the striping does not occur if that the striping occurs and the hircineness does not occur does not hold. sent2: the bacchanal does not occur if the striping happens. sent3: if the dried does not occur the fact that both the insolation and the upgrading Nightingale happens is wrong. sent4: the fact that the insolation happens and the upgrading Nightingale happens is not correct. sent5: the fact that the insolation does not occur hold if the quickening happens. sent6: the insolation does not occur. sent7: the insolation does not occur but the upgrading Nightingale happens if the quickening happens. sent8: that the quickening does not occur or the striping or both triggers that the bacchanal does not occur. sent9: the fact that if the drying happens the fact that both the striping and the non-hircineness occurs is wrong hold. sent10: if the dried does not occur then the fact that the insolation does not occur but the upgrading Nightingale occurs is not true. sent11: the dried does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quickening happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the insolation does not occur but the upgrading Nightingale happens.; sent10 & sent11 -> int2: that the insolation does not occur but the upgrading Nightingale happens is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the quickening does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the quickening does not occur and/or the striping happens.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the bacchanal occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the bacchanal does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the striping does not occur if that the striping occurs and the hircineness does not occur does not hold. sent2: the bacchanal does not occur if the striping happens. sent3: if the dried does not occur the fact that both the insolation and the upgrading Nightingale happens is wrong. sent4: the fact that the insolation happens and the upgrading Nightingale happens is not correct. sent5: the fact that the insolation does not occur hold if the quickening happens. sent6: the insolation does not occur. sent7: the insolation does not occur but the upgrading Nightingale happens if the quickening happens. sent8: that the quickening does not occur or the striping or both triggers that the bacchanal does not occur. sent9: the fact that if the drying happens the fact that both the striping and the non-hircineness occurs is wrong hold. sent10: if the dried does not occur then the fact that the insolation does not occur but the upgrading Nightingale occurs is not true. sent11: the dried does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quickening happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the insolation does not occur but the upgrading Nightingale happens.; sent10 & sent11 -> int2: that the insolation does not occur but the upgrading Nightingale happens is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the quickening does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the quickening does not occur and/or the striping happens.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__