the antidotalness does not occur and the swelling happens.
sent1: that the fact that the prescriptiveness occurs and the theophany occurs is right is false if the blackmailing defendant does not occur. sent2: if the ninjutsu occurs then that not the scam but the blackmailing defendant occurs is not true. sent3: the squinching evanescence occurs. sent4: the fact that not the antidotalness but the swell occurs is wrong if the drumming does not occur. sent5: the beggar-my-neighbor does not occur. sent6: the blackmailing halon does not occur and/or the thinkableness happens. sent7: the fact that not the Ionianness but the Teutonicness happens is not true. sent8: if the keratotomy does not occur the dipolarness happens and the Ionian happens. sent9: if the drumming does not occur the predating wickiup does not occur and/or the squinching Valdez does not occur. sent10: that either the ninjutsu does not occur or the dipolarness does not occur or both prevents the antidotalness. sent11: the theophany is prevented by that the drum and the prescriptiveness happens. sent12: if the blackmailing defendant does not occur and the scam does not occur then the ninjutsu does not occur. sent13: the fact that the keratotomy but not the viatication happens is not true. sent14: the decamping occurs and the stag occurs. sent15: that the theophany happens and the prescriptiveness happens is not correct if the blackmailing defendant does not occur. sent16: that the blackmailing defendant occurs is prevented by that not the scam but the ninjutsu occurs. sent17: the insensitiveness occurs and the arson occurs. sent18: the swell happens if the Ionian happens. sent19: that the drum occurs is not incorrect. sent20: if that the Ionianness does not occur and the Teutonicness happens is not correct then the Ionianness occurs. sent21: both the theophany and the non-prescriptiveness occurs if the blackmailing defendant does not occur. sent22: if the convergentness does not occur then the scouting crucifixion does not occur. sent23: the blackmailing defendant does not occur and the scam does not occur if the prescriptiveness does not occur. sent24: if the keratotomy does not occur that either the Ionianness happens or the dipolarness happens or both hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prescriptiveness happens.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the drumming occurs and the prescriptiveness happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the theophany does not occur.; sent20 & sent7 -> int3: the Ionian occurs.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the swell occurs.;
that both the non-antidotalness and the swelling occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the antidotalness does not occur and the swelling happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the prescriptiveness occurs and the theophany occurs is right is false if the blackmailing defendant does not occur. sent2: if the ninjutsu occurs then that not the scam but the blackmailing defendant occurs is not true. sent3: the squinching evanescence occurs. sent4: the fact that not the antidotalness but the swell occurs is wrong if the drumming does not occur. sent5: the beggar-my-neighbor does not occur. sent6: the blackmailing halon does not occur and/or the thinkableness happens. sent7: the fact that not the Ionianness but the Teutonicness happens is not true. sent8: if the keratotomy does not occur the dipolarness happens and the Ionian happens. sent9: if the drumming does not occur the predating wickiup does not occur and/or the squinching Valdez does not occur. sent10: that either the ninjutsu does not occur or the dipolarness does not occur or both prevents the antidotalness. sent11: the theophany is prevented by that the drum and the prescriptiveness happens. sent12: if the blackmailing defendant does not occur and the scam does not occur then the ninjutsu does not occur. sent13: the fact that the keratotomy but not the viatication happens is not true. sent14: the decamping occurs and the stag occurs. sent15: that the theophany happens and the prescriptiveness happens is not correct if the blackmailing defendant does not occur. sent16: that the blackmailing defendant occurs is prevented by that not the scam but the ninjutsu occurs. sent17: the insensitiveness occurs and the arson occurs. sent18: the swell happens if the Ionian happens. sent19: that the drum occurs is not incorrect. sent20: if that the Ionianness does not occur and the Teutonicness happens is not correct then the Ionianness occurs. sent21: both the theophany and the non-prescriptiveness occurs if the blackmailing defendant does not occur. sent22: if the convergentness does not occur then the scouting crucifixion does not occur. sent23: the blackmailing defendant does not occur and the scam does not occur if the prescriptiveness does not occur. sent24: if the keratotomy does not occur that either the Ionianness happens or the dipolarness happens or both hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prescriptiveness happens.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the drumming occurs and the prescriptiveness happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the theophany does not occur.; sent20 & sent7 -> int3: the Ionian occurs.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the swell occurs.; __UNKNOWN__