the ambulacrum is not a honey and not climatic.
sent1: if the dedifferentiation is not climatic then the ambulacrum is climatic. sent2: something is a kind of a honey if the fact that it is not a kind of a honey and is not a kind of a defibrillator is not true. sent3: something does rubbish. sent4: if the dedifferentiation is not climatic the ambulacrum does not honey and it is not climatic. sent5: there exists something such that it is nacreous and it does rubbish. sent6: there exists something such that it is not nacreous. sent7: everything is a garambulla and a meninx. sent8: there is something such that that it is Lebanese and it is industrial is not correct. sent9: that something is not a honey and it is not climatic is not right if it is inextinguishable. sent10: if the lamplighter is not nacreous then it is not a kind of a Michigander. sent11: something is not nacreous but it rubbishes. sent12: the hammerhead is not inextinguishable if something is loyal and it honeys. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Lebanese and it is industrial is wrong then the dedifferentiation is not disloyal. sent14: if that something is not inextinguishable is correct then it is not climatic. sent15: the dedifferentiation is not inextinguishable if something is a kind of non-nacreous thing that is a kind of a rubbish. sent16: the ambulacrum is not climatic.
sent11 & sent15 -> int1: the dedifferentiation is not inextinguishable.; sent14 -> int2: the dedifferentiation is not climatic if it is not inextinguishable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dedifferentiation is not climatic.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the ambulacrum is not a honey and not climatic is incorrect.
sent9 -> int4: if the ambulacrum is inextinguishable then that it is not a kind of a honey and is not climatic is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the ambulacrum is not a honey and not climatic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dedifferentiation is not climatic then the ambulacrum is climatic. sent2: something is a kind of a honey if the fact that it is not a kind of a honey and is not a kind of a defibrillator is not true. sent3: something does rubbish. sent4: if the dedifferentiation is not climatic the ambulacrum does not honey and it is not climatic. sent5: there exists something such that it is nacreous and it does rubbish. sent6: there exists something such that it is not nacreous. sent7: everything is a garambulla and a meninx. sent8: there is something such that that it is Lebanese and it is industrial is not correct. sent9: that something is not a honey and it is not climatic is not right if it is inextinguishable. sent10: if the lamplighter is not nacreous then it is not a kind of a Michigander. sent11: something is not nacreous but it rubbishes. sent12: the hammerhead is not inextinguishable if something is loyal and it honeys. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Lebanese and it is industrial is wrong then the dedifferentiation is not disloyal. sent14: if that something is not inextinguishable is correct then it is not climatic. sent15: the dedifferentiation is not inextinguishable if something is a kind of non-nacreous thing that is a kind of a rubbish. sent16: the ambulacrum is not climatic. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent15 -> int1: the dedifferentiation is not inextinguishable.; sent14 -> int2: the dedifferentiation is not climatic if it is not inextinguishable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dedifferentiation is not climatic.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__