the fact that there is something such that if it is a Trachurus it is a carhop is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the hatemonger is not a Akeridae and wanders is not true if it is a Trachurus. sent2: if something is a kite then the fact that it does not wander and is not a smear is not right. sent3: something is a carhop if the fact that it is not a Akeridae and does not wander is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it does spare it is a mollycoddle. sent5: there exists something such that if it pans anthropoid then that it is structural is correct. sent6: the hatemonger is exterior. sent7: that the hatemonger is not a Akeridae but it wanders does not hold. sent8: if the hatemonger is a Trachurus the fact that it is not a kind of a Akeridae and it does not wander is wrong. sent9: if something is a Trachurus then that it is not a kind of a organon and it does not vex construction is wrong. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the hatemonger does wander is true the hatemonger is a kind of a carhop is not incorrect. sent11: if something wanders then it is a carhop.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hatemonger is a Trachurus.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hatemonger is not a kind of a Akeridae and does not wander is not correct.; sent3 -> int2: if that the hatemonger is not a Akeridae and it does not wander is not true it is a carhop.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hatemonger is a carhop.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the hatemonger is a Trachurus it is a kind of a carhop.; int4 -> hypothesis;
that the kaon is not a organon and does not vex construction is incorrect if it is a Trachurus.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a Trachurus it is a carhop is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hatemonger is not a Akeridae and wanders is not true if it is a Trachurus. sent2: if something is a kite then the fact that it does not wander and is not a smear is not right. sent3: something is a carhop if the fact that it is not a Akeridae and does not wander is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it does spare it is a mollycoddle. sent5: there exists something such that if it pans anthropoid then that it is structural is correct. sent6: the hatemonger is exterior. sent7: that the hatemonger is not a Akeridae but it wanders does not hold. sent8: if the hatemonger is a Trachurus the fact that it is not a kind of a Akeridae and it does not wander is wrong. sent9: if something is a Trachurus then that it is not a kind of a organon and it does not vex construction is wrong. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the hatemonger does wander is true the hatemonger is a kind of a carhop is not incorrect. sent11: if something wanders then it is a carhop. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hatemonger is a Trachurus.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hatemonger is not a kind of a Akeridae and does not wander is not correct.; sent3 -> int2: if that the hatemonger is not a Akeridae and it does not wander is not true it is a carhop.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hatemonger is a carhop.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the hatemonger is a Trachurus it is a kind of a carhop.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__