the fact that there is something such that if it is not bicapsular that it rabbets Chaucer and is a rheostat is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: if that something is not bicapsular is not false then that it does rabbet Chaucer and is a rheostat is not correct. sent2: that the chenille does rabbet Chaucer and it is a rheostat does not hold if it is bicapsular. sent3: if the chenille is not a rheostat then the fact that it is a charitableness that wears chenille is false. sent4: the fact that something does rabbet Chaucer and is a rheostat does not hold if that it is bicapsular is true. sent5: there exists something such that if it is bicapsular then that it rabbets Chaucer and is a rheostat is false. sent6: a non-bicapsular thing rabbets Chaucer and is a kind of a rheostat. sent7: there is something such that if it is not bicapsular it rabbets Chaucer and it is a rheostat. sent8: if something is not a turning then the fact that it rabbets capriccio and is a Michigan does not hold. sent9: that that something is a hemoglobinopathy and it does rabbet Chaucer is not right if it does not rabbet myology hold.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the chenille does rabbet Chaucer and it is a kind of a rheostat is not right if it is non-bicapsular.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the chenille is a hemoglobinopathy that rabbets Chaucer is wrong if it does not rabbet myology.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not bicapsular that it rabbets Chaucer and is a rheostat is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not bicapsular is not false then that it does rabbet Chaucer and is a rheostat is not correct. sent2: that the chenille does rabbet Chaucer and it is a rheostat does not hold if it is bicapsular. sent3: if the chenille is not a rheostat then the fact that it is a charitableness that wears chenille is false. sent4: the fact that something does rabbet Chaucer and is a rheostat does not hold if that it is bicapsular is true. sent5: there exists something such that if it is bicapsular then that it rabbets Chaucer and is a rheostat is false. sent6: a non-bicapsular thing rabbets Chaucer and is a kind of a rheostat. sent7: there is something such that if it is not bicapsular it rabbets Chaucer and it is a rheostat. sent8: if something is not a turning then the fact that it rabbets capriccio and is a Michigan does not hold. sent9: that that something is a hemoglobinopathy and it does rabbet Chaucer is not right if it does not rabbet myology hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the chenille does rabbet Chaucer and it is a kind of a rheostat is not right if it is non-bicapsular.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__