that not the launching but the urticating melioration occurs if the incriminating contest occurs is wrong.
sent1: if the incriminating powwow happens the fact that the urticating melioration happens is not wrong. sent2: the nordicness occurs. sent3: the fact that the misdeal occurs is not false. sent4: not the ascension but the breaking occurs. sent5: the evisceration occurs if the neglect occurs. sent6: the granting happens. sent7: that the incriminating contest happens triggers the incriminating powwow. sent8: if the Romany occurs the lunisolarness does not occur but the ascension occurs. sent9: the middling happens. sent10: the fact that the toss and the bracteolateness occurs is correct if the riddling Diodontidae occurs. sent11: if that the incriminating powwow occurs is true then both the launching and the urticating melioration happens. sent12: if the alternateness happens that the deductible does not occur and the sticking spokeswoman happens is right. sent13: that the incriminating powwow occurs triggers that the launch does not occur and the urticating melioration happens. sent14: if that the domesticity happens is not false not the commercialization but the planting occurs. sent15: the gestationalness does not occur but the evisceration happens if the breaking occurs. sent16: the Cartesianness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incriminating contest happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the incriminating powwow happens.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: not the launching but the urticating melioration happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that not the launching but the urticating melioration occurs if the incriminating contest occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the incriminating powwow happens the fact that the urticating melioration happens is not wrong. sent2: the nordicness occurs. sent3: the fact that the misdeal occurs is not false. sent4: not the ascension but the breaking occurs. sent5: the evisceration occurs if the neglect occurs. sent6: the granting happens. sent7: that the incriminating contest happens triggers the incriminating powwow. sent8: if the Romany occurs the lunisolarness does not occur but the ascension occurs. sent9: the middling happens. sent10: the fact that the toss and the bracteolateness occurs is correct if the riddling Diodontidae occurs. sent11: if that the incriminating powwow occurs is true then both the launching and the urticating melioration happens. sent12: if the alternateness happens that the deductible does not occur and the sticking spokeswoman happens is right. sent13: that the incriminating powwow occurs triggers that the launch does not occur and the urticating melioration happens. sent14: if that the domesticity happens is not false not the commercialization but the planting occurs. sent15: the gestationalness does not occur but the evisceration happens if the breaking occurs. sent16: the Cartesianness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incriminating contest happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the incriminating powwow happens.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: not the launching but the urticating melioration happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__