the tuff is a kind of a confidante.
sent1: the fact that the Vandyke spends homonym is not false if the fact that it does not labor stagecraft and is not a tripling is wrong. sent2: an affluence is a confidante and does not rehabilitate schmuck. sent3: if the alumroot is a confidante and does not rehabilitate schmuck the ectomorph is not a sabbatical. sent4: the alumroot is not vitreous and it is not a kind of a sabbatical. sent5: the Vandyke does not spend hagberry. sent6: the tuff is not a kind of a whip. sent7: if the fact that the tuff is not vitreous hold then the alumroot is not vitreous but it is a confidante. sent8: the alumroot is not a sabbatical but it is a confidante. sent9: if something is Dostoevskian then it is an affluence. sent10: the alumroot rehabilitates schmuck if the tuff is not sabbatical. sent11: if something does spend homonym then the ectomorph is not a grudge. sent12: the fact that the tuff is vitreous is true if the alumroot is not a confidante. sent13: the fact that the fact that the fact that the Vandyke does not labor stagecraft and it is not a tripling is right is incorrect is not incorrect if it does not spend hagberry. sent14: either the alumroot is not a kind of a grudge or it is not a kind of a lamentation or both if there exists something such that it is not a grudge. sent15: the tuff is not non-vitreous if the alumroot does not rehabilitate schmuck. sent16: if that something is an affluence that does not rehabilitate schmuck is incorrect then that it is not a kind of a confidante hold. sent17: the arbovirus does rehabilitate schmuck. sent18: the ectomorph is a kind of a blond. sent19: that the ectomorph is a confidante is wrong if the alumroot is non-vitreous thing that is not sabbatical. sent20: the tuff is not a confidante and rehabilitates schmuck if the ectomorph is not a confidante. sent21: if the alumroot rehabilitates schmuck and is not sabbatical the tuff is not a kind of a confidante.
sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the ectomorph is not a kind of a confidante.; sent20 & int1 -> int2: the tuff is not a kind of a confidante but it rehabilitates schmuck.; int2 -> hypothesis;
the sticktight is not a confidante.
sent16 -> int3: if that the sticktight is an affluence but it does not rehabilitate schmuck is not correct then it is not a kind of a confidante.;
$hypothesis$ = the tuff is a kind of a confidante. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Vandyke spends homonym is not false if the fact that it does not labor stagecraft and is not a tripling is wrong. sent2: an affluence is a confidante and does not rehabilitate schmuck. sent3: if the alumroot is a confidante and does not rehabilitate schmuck the ectomorph is not a sabbatical. sent4: the alumroot is not vitreous and it is not a kind of a sabbatical. sent5: the Vandyke does not spend hagberry. sent6: the tuff is not a kind of a whip. sent7: if the fact that the tuff is not vitreous hold then the alumroot is not vitreous but it is a confidante. sent8: the alumroot is not a sabbatical but it is a confidante. sent9: if something is Dostoevskian then it is an affluence. sent10: the alumroot rehabilitates schmuck if the tuff is not sabbatical. sent11: if something does spend homonym then the ectomorph is not a grudge. sent12: the fact that the tuff is vitreous is true if the alumroot is not a confidante. sent13: the fact that the fact that the fact that the Vandyke does not labor stagecraft and it is not a tripling is right is incorrect is not incorrect if it does not spend hagberry. sent14: either the alumroot is not a kind of a grudge or it is not a kind of a lamentation or both if there exists something such that it is not a grudge. sent15: the tuff is not non-vitreous if the alumroot does not rehabilitate schmuck. sent16: if that something is an affluence that does not rehabilitate schmuck is incorrect then that it is not a kind of a confidante hold. sent17: the arbovirus does rehabilitate schmuck. sent18: the ectomorph is a kind of a blond. sent19: that the ectomorph is a confidante is wrong if the alumroot is non-vitreous thing that is not sabbatical. sent20: the tuff is not a confidante and rehabilitates schmuck if the ectomorph is not a confidante. sent21: if the alumroot rehabilitates schmuck and is not sabbatical the tuff is not a kind of a confidante. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the ectomorph is not a kind of a confidante.; sent20 & int1 -> int2: the tuff is not a kind of a confidante but it rehabilitates schmuck.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__