there is something such that if it is not a collectivization that it is not superficial and it does not stake is not right.
sent1: the mishap is not superficial and is not a stake if it is not a collectivization. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a collectivization hold then the fact that it is superficial thing that is not a stake does not hold. sent3: that the fact that the chopine is not a coroner and not a Lausanne is not true is right if it is not a kind of a collectivization. sent4: that there is something such that if it is not a collectivization then that it is a kind of non-superficial thing that is a kind of a stake is not true is correct. sent5: if the mishap is not superficial then that it is not undomestic and it is not a kind of a Telugu is incorrect. sent6: if the mishap is a collectivization the fact that it is not superficial and is not a kind of a stake is not true. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a collectivization it is not superficial and it is not a stake. sent8: if the mishap is not a collectivization then the fact that it is superficial and it is not a stake is false. sent9: the fact that the angiologist does not queue bored and is not a stake does not hold if it is not umbilical. sent10: the fact that the fact that the mishap is not superficial but it stakes is right is incorrect if it is not a kind of a collectivization. sent11: if the mishap is not a kind of a collectivization the fact that it is not superficial and it does not stake is false. sent12: there is something such that if it does not queue membrane the fact that it is a kind of non-sociological thing that is not unalert does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a collectivization then the fact that it is not superficial and it is not a stake is not right. sent14: there is something such that if it is not preventable then that it is not a anticyclone and is not a ology is not true.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a collectivization that it is not superficial and it does not stake is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the mishap is not superficial and is not a stake if it is not a collectivization. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a collectivization hold then the fact that it is superficial thing that is not a stake does not hold. sent3: that the fact that the chopine is not a coroner and not a Lausanne is not true is right if it is not a kind of a collectivization. sent4: that there is something such that if it is not a collectivization then that it is a kind of non-superficial thing that is a kind of a stake is not true is correct. sent5: if the mishap is not superficial then that it is not undomestic and it is not a kind of a Telugu is incorrect. sent6: if the mishap is a collectivization the fact that it is not superficial and is not a kind of a stake is not true. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a collectivization it is not superficial and it is not a stake. sent8: if the mishap is not a collectivization then the fact that it is superficial and it is not a stake is false. sent9: the fact that the angiologist does not queue bored and is not a stake does not hold if it is not umbilical. sent10: the fact that the fact that the mishap is not superficial but it stakes is right is incorrect if it is not a kind of a collectivization. sent11: if the mishap is not a kind of a collectivization the fact that it is not superficial and it does not stake is false. sent12: there is something such that if it does not queue membrane the fact that it is a kind of non-sociological thing that is not unalert does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a collectivization then the fact that it is not superficial and it is not a stake is not right. sent14: there is something such that if it is not preventable then that it is not a anticyclone and is not a ology is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__