the staying does not occur.
sent1: if the uncommunicativeness happens the vestmentalness does not occur. sent2: that the plotting does not occur and the avitaminoticness does not occur is not correct. sent3: the non-multilevelness yields the stay. sent4: if the diffusing balm occurs the unairworthiness does not occur. sent5: that the dullness and the con happens brings about that the damaging does not occur. sent6: the fact that the unairworthiness happens and the dullness occurs hold if the con does not occur. sent7: the fact that the abandoning Teleprompter occurs hold. sent8: the damaging occurs. sent9: the instructiveness happens and the maximalness occurs. sent10: the strangeness occurs. sent11: the non-hydrousness is caused by the multilevelness. sent12: the investigating conservator is brought about by the non-pyknoticness. sent13: the fact that the parhelicness occurs and the hanging happens is not true. sent14: the fact that the neuralgicness but not the heraldicness occurs is false if the instructiveness does not occur. sent15: the investigating Bakelite does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the hydrousness does not occur is not false then the fact that the diffusing balm does not occur and the unairworthiness does not occur does not hold. sent17: if that the fact that the diffusing Muztag and the investigating megaton occurs is incorrect is not false the investigating megaton does not occur. sent18: the fact that the fact that the debriefing interpreter does not occur is not false if the effecting occurs is not wrong. sent19: the melioration does not occur. sent20: if that the diffusing balm does not occur and the unairworthiness does not occur is not correct the dullness occurs. sent21: the fact that both the diffusing Muztag and the investigating megaton happens does not hold. sent22: the diffusing constrictor happens. sent23: the fact that the fact that the diffusing balm occurs but the hydrousness does not occur is incorrect if the unairworthiness occurs is not false. sent24: the con occurs if the investigating megaton does not occur but the strangeness happens. sent25: that either the multilevelness occurs or the hydrousness occurs or both is right if the unairworthiness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the multilevelness occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the hydrousness does not occur.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the diffusing balm does not occur and the unairworthiness does not occur does not hold.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the dullness happens.; sent17 & sent21 -> int4: the investigating megaton does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the investigating megaton does not occur and the strangeness occurs.; sent24 & int5 -> int6: the con happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: both the dulling and the con occurs.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the damages does not occur.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the multilevelness does not occur is true.; int10 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the Homericness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the staying does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the uncommunicativeness happens the vestmentalness does not occur. sent2: that the plotting does not occur and the avitaminoticness does not occur is not correct. sent3: the non-multilevelness yields the stay. sent4: if the diffusing balm occurs the unairworthiness does not occur. sent5: that the dullness and the con happens brings about that the damaging does not occur. sent6: the fact that the unairworthiness happens and the dullness occurs hold if the con does not occur. sent7: the fact that the abandoning Teleprompter occurs hold. sent8: the damaging occurs. sent9: the instructiveness happens and the maximalness occurs. sent10: the strangeness occurs. sent11: the non-hydrousness is caused by the multilevelness. sent12: the investigating conservator is brought about by the non-pyknoticness. sent13: the fact that the parhelicness occurs and the hanging happens is not true. sent14: the fact that the neuralgicness but not the heraldicness occurs is false if the instructiveness does not occur. sent15: the investigating Bakelite does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the hydrousness does not occur is not false then the fact that the diffusing balm does not occur and the unairworthiness does not occur does not hold. sent17: if that the fact that the diffusing Muztag and the investigating megaton occurs is incorrect is not false the investigating megaton does not occur. sent18: the fact that the fact that the debriefing interpreter does not occur is not false if the effecting occurs is not wrong. sent19: the melioration does not occur. sent20: if that the diffusing balm does not occur and the unairworthiness does not occur is not correct the dullness occurs. sent21: the fact that both the diffusing Muztag and the investigating megaton happens does not hold. sent22: the diffusing constrictor happens. sent23: the fact that the fact that the diffusing balm occurs but the hydrousness does not occur is incorrect if the unairworthiness occurs is not false. sent24: the con occurs if the investigating megaton does not occur but the strangeness happens. sent25: that either the multilevelness occurs or the hydrousness occurs or both is right if the unairworthiness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the multilevelness occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the hydrousness does not occur.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the diffusing balm does not occur and the unairworthiness does not occur does not hold.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the dullness happens.; sent17 & sent21 -> int4: the investigating megaton does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the investigating megaton does not occur and the strangeness occurs.; sent24 & int5 -> int6: the con happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: both the dulling and the con occurs.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the damages does not occur.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: that the multilevelness does not occur is true.; int10 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__