the militariness occurs.
sent1: if the insubordination does not occur then the mastoid but not the clanger occurs. sent2: the Venezuelan does not occur. sent3: that the rigmarole occurs is prevented by that the mastoid occurs and the clanger does not occur. sent4: the detoxifying occurs. sent5: the militariness occurs if the sparging alkapton but not the speaking CST occurs. sent6: if that the Christianization occurs is correct the fatherhood occurs but the soubrette does not occur. sent7: that if the fact that both the revenging and the redaction occurs is not true the revenging does not occur is correct. sent8: that the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST occurs is incorrect. sent9: that the sparging alkapton happens and the speaking CST does not occur does not hold. sent10: the fact that the revenging and the redaction occurs is not true if the rigmarole does not occur. sent11: the sparging nut does not occur and the updating espadrille does not occur. sent12: both the gratification and the fatherhood happens. sent13: the function occurs. sent14: that the revenging does not occur brings about that the Christianization and the sparging indiction happens. sent15: the militariness is triggered by that the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST occurs. sent16: if that the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST does not occur does not hold then the gratification does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST does not occur is incorrect.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the gratification does not occur.; sent12 -> int2: the gratification occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST does not occur.;
the military does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the militariness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the insubordination does not occur then the mastoid but not the clanger occurs. sent2: the Venezuelan does not occur. sent3: that the rigmarole occurs is prevented by that the mastoid occurs and the clanger does not occur. sent4: the detoxifying occurs. sent5: the militariness occurs if the sparging alkapton but not the speaking CST occurs. sent6: if that the Christianization occurs is correct the fatherhood occurs but the soubrette does not occur. sent7: that if the fact that both the revenging and the redaction occurs is not true the revenging does not occur is correct. sent8: that the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST occurs is incorrect. sent9: that the sparging alkapton happens and the speaking CST does not occur does not hold. sent10: the fact that the revenging and the redaction occurs is not true if the rigmarole does not occur. sent11: the sparging nut does not occur and the updating espadrille does not occur. sent12: both the gratification and the fatherhood happens. sent13: the function occurs. sent14: that the revenging does not occur brings about that the Christianization and the sparging indiction happens. sent15: the militariness is triggered by that the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST occurs. sent16: if that the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST does not occur does not hold then the gratification does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST does not occur is incorrect.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the gratification does not occur.; sent12 -> int2: the gratification occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sparging alkapton does not occur and the speaking CST does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__