that there is something such that if it is an arraignment then it is not invasive and it is a kind of a dallisgrass is not correct.
sent1: if the ivy is an arraignment and it is invasive it is not a kind of a tackle. sent2: if that the ivy does not tackle and is gymnospermous does not hold then it does tackle. sent3: if that the ivy is not a dallisgrass and is transuranic is wrong it is a dallisgrass. sent4: that the ivy is not a kind of a tackle and is gymnospermous does not hold. sent5: if something is a kind of a Vila the fact that it is not a kind of a dallisgrass and it is transuranic is not right. sent6: the ivy is a Vila.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ivy is a kind of an arraignment.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ivy is invasive.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the ivy is a kind of an arraignment that is invasive.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ivy does not tackle.; sent2 & sent4 -> int3: the ivy is a tackle.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the ivy is not invasive.; sent5 -> int6: the fact that the ivy is not a dallisgrass but it is transuranic is not true if it is a kind of a Vila.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that the ivy is not a dallisgrass but transuranic does not hold.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the ivy is a kind of a dallisgrass.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the ivy is not invasive but it is a kind of a dallisgrass.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the ivy is not invasive but it is a dallisgrass if it is an arraignment.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is an arraignment then it is not invasive and it is a kind of a dallisgrass is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ivy is an arraignment and it is invasive it is not a kind of a tackle. sent2: if that the ivy does not tackle and is gymnospermous does not hold then it does tackle. sent3: if that the ivy is not a dallisgrass and is transuranic is wrong it is a dallisgrass. sent4: that the ivy is not a kind of a tackle and is gymnospermous does not hold. sent5: if something is a kind of a Vila the fact that it is not a kind of a dallisgrass and it is transuranic is not right. sent6: the ivy is a Vila. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ivy is a kind of an arraignment.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ivy is invasive.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the ivy is a kind of an arraignment that is invasive.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ivy does not tackle.; sent2 & sent4 -> int3: the ivy is a tackle.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the ivy is not invasive.; sent5 -> int6: the fact that the ivy is not a dallisgrass but it is transuranic is not true if it is a kind of a Vila.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that the ivy is not a dallisgrass but transuranic does not hold.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the ivy is a kind of a dallisgrass.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the ivy is not invasive but it is a kind of a dallisgrass.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the ivy is not invasive but it is a dallisgrass if it is an arraignment.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__