the stay causes that the nonindulgentness does not occur.
sent1: the ploy does not occur. sent2: the backstopping handwheel occurs and the intrauterineness happens. sent3: the ailing occurs. sent4: that the successfulness does not occur hold if both the caulineness and the organicisticness happens. sent5: the hounding dairy occurs and the sobering occurs. sent6: the nonindulgentness happens if the staying occurs. sent7: the paleocorticalness does not occur if the surrounding occurs. sent8: the backstopping schizocarp occurs. sent9: the palatalizing mayoress does not occur. sent10: the shaping does not occur if the volubleness occurs and the tackle happens. sent11: the micropylarness happens. sent12: the unconstitutionalness occurs. sent13: that the nonindulgentness and the staying happens results in that the unconstitutionalness does not occur. sent14: the staling does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nonindulgentness occurs is not incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the staying occurs.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: both the nonindulgentness and the staying happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the unconstitutionalness does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the nonindulgentness does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the stay causes that the nonindulgentness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ploy does not occur. sent2: the backstopping handwheel occurs and the intrauterineness happens. sent3: the ailing occurs. sent4: that the successfulness does not occur hold if both the caulineness and the organicisticness happens. sent5: the hounding dairy occurs and the sobering occurs. sent6: the nonindulgentness happens if the staying occurs. sent7: the paleocorticalness does not occur if the surrounding occurs. sent8: the backstopping schizocarp occurs. sent9: the palatalizing mayoress does not occur. sent10: the shaping does not occur if the volubleness occurs and the tackle happens. sent11: the micropylarness happens. sent12: the unconstitutionalness occurs. sent13: that the nonindulgentness and the staying happens results in that the unconstitutionalness does not occur. sent14: the staling does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nonindulgentness occurs is not incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the staying occurs.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: both the nonindulgentness and the staying happens.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the unconstitutionalness does not occur.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the nonindulgentness does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__