the jaguar is a glide.
sent1: that the pewter fettles and it curbs warpath is not true. sent2: the toke depresses if something is not a nosology and it does not interpose precipitator. sent3: the pewter does not stub assonance if the fact that it fettles and it does not curb warpath is not correct. sent4: the precipitator is not a nosology and it does not interpose precipitator. sent5: the tomtit is not a kind of a bluefin if that the jaguar is not a back but it is a kind of a glide is correct. sent6: if the tomtit is not a bluefin that the pewter does fettle and does not curb warpath does not hold. sent7: that the pewter is a kind of a fettle but it is not a kind of a glide is incorrect if the toke does not stub assonance. sent8: the jaguar is not a bluefin if the tomtit does curb warpath or it is a kind of a glide or both. sent9: something does not stub assonance and it is not a fanion if it depresses. sent10: the fact that everything is both not back and cardiac is correct. sent11: the pewter does not stub assonance if it curbs warpath. sent12: that the fact that the pewter is a fettle and it curbs warpath does not hold is not false if the fact that the tomtit is not a bluefin is not wrong. sent13: the jaguar is cardiac. sent14: the pewter stubs assonance and is a fanion.
sent10 -> int1: the jaguar is not a back but it is cardiac.; int1 -> int2: the jaguar does not back.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jaguar is a glide.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the fact that the jaguar is not back and does glide is right.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the tomtit is not a kind of a bluefin.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the pewter is a fettle but it does not curb warpath is incorrect.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the pewter does not stub assonance.; sent14 -> int7: the pewter stubs assonance.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the jaguar is not a kind of a bluefin.
sent9 -> int9: if the toke depresses then it does not stub assonance and it is not a fanion.; sent4 -> int10: something is not a nosology and it does not interpose precipitator.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the toke does depress.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the toke does not stub assonance and is not a fanion.; int12 -> int13: the toke does not stub assonance.; sent7 & int13 -> int14: that the pewter fettles but it is not a glide is not right.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it is a fettle and it is not a glide is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the jaguar is a glide. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pewter fettles and it curbs warpath is not true. sent2: the toke depresses if something is not a nosology and it does not interpose precipitator. sent3: the pewter does not stub assonance if the fact that it fettles and it does not curb warpath is not correct. sent4: the precipitator is not a nosology and it does not interpose precipitator. sent5: the tomtit is not a kind of a bluefin if that the jaguar is not a back but it is a kind of a glide is correct. sent6: if the tomtit is not a bluefin that the pewter does fettle and does not curb warpath does not hold. sent7: that the pewter is a kind of a fettle but it is not a kind of a glide is incorrect if the toke does not stub assonance. sent8: the jaguar is not a bluefin if the tomtit does curb warpath or it is a kind of a glide or both. sent9: something does not stub assonance and it is not a fanion if it depresses. sent10: the fact that everything is both not back and cardiac is correct. sent11: the pewter does not stub assonance if it curbs warpath. sent12: that the fact that the pewter is a fettle and it curbs warpath does not hold is not false if the fact that the tomtit is not a bluefin is not wrong. sent13: the jaguar is cardiac. sent14: the pewter stubs assonance and is a fanion. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the jaguar is not a back but it is cardiac.; int1 -> int2: the jaguar does not back.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jaguar is a glide.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the fact that the jaguar is not back and does glide is right.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the tomtit is not a kind of a bluefin.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the pewter is a fettle but it does not curb warpath is incorrect.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the pewter does not stub assonance.; sent14 -> int7: the pewter stubs assonance.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__