the isolation is not bimetallistic.
sent1: the bat does not sail if it is opisthognathous. sent2: that the bolero does not melanize cot hold. sent3: if something promises and does not repine bat then it is not bimetallistic. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a stacte. sent5: the bat does not reposition but it is opisthognathous if the bolero does not melanize cot. sent6: if there is something such that that it is a promise and does not repine bat is false then the niblick is not nonreticulate. sent7: if the niblick is not nonreticulate then the Millet is a kind of a stacte and it is a Silverstein. sent8: the fact that the bat is a sail is correct if there exists something such that it is both a stacte and a Silverstein. sent9: That the cot does not melanize bolero hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the isolation is a kind of a promise that does not repine bat is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a promise and does not repine bat is wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the niblick is not nonreticulate.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Millet is a stacte and it is a Silverstein.; int3 -> int4: something is a stacte and a Silverstein.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the bat is a sail.; sent5 & sent2 -> int6: the bat does not reposition and is opisthognathous.; int6 -> int7: that the bat is opisthognathous is not wrong.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the bat is not a sail.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the isolation is a promise but it does not repine bat.; sent3 -> int11: the isolation is not bimetallistic if it does promise and it does not repine bat.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the isolation is not bimetallistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the bat does not sail if it is opisthognathous. sent2: that the bolero does not melanize cot hold. sent3: if something promises and does not repine bat then it is not bimetallistic. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a stacte. sent5: the bat does not reposition but it is opisthognathous if the bolero does not melanize cot. sent6: if there is something such that that it is a promise and does not repine bat is false then the niblick is not nonreticulate. sent7: if the niblick is not nonreticulate then the Millet is a kind of a stacte and it is a Silverstein. sent8: the fact that the bat is a sail is correct if there exists something such that it is both a stacte and a Silverstein. sent9: That the cot does not melanize bolero hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the isolation is a kind of a promise that does not repine bat is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a promise and does not repine bat is wrong.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the niblick is not nonreticulate.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Millet is a stacte and it is a Silverstein.; int3 -> int4: something is a stacte and a Silverstein.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the bat is a sail.; sent5 & sent2 -> int6: the bat does not reposition and is opisthognathous.; int6 -> int7: that the bat is opisthognathous is not wrong.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the bat is not a sail.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the isolation is a promise but it does not repine bat.; sent3 -> int11: the isolation is not bimetallistic if it does promise and it does not repine bat.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__