the behavioralness happens.
sent1: that not the subvention but the fearing philosophy occurs prevents that the destruction happens. sent2: the Machiavellian does not occur and the polychromaticness does not occur. sent3: the anaplasticness occurs. sent4: that the mercilessness and the non-nomotheticness occurs is not right if the polymericness does not occur. sent5: that the conventionalizing Cicero occurs is triggered by the unimodalness. sent6: the fruitfulness occurs. sent7: if the fact that the polymericness happens is not false then the behavioralness occurs. sent8: if the fearing Hemachatus occurs then the unimodalness occurs. sent9: the fearing retardant does not occur. sent10: the punctilio occurs. sent11: if the imbibing does not occur then the Maundy does not occur. sent12: that the Cromwellianness does not occur and the sawm does not occur is caused by that the barring does not occur. sent13: that the fearing Hemachatus does not occur is prevented by the craziness. sent14: the bar does not occur. sent15: the craziness happens if the fact that the mercilessness but not the nomotheticness happens is incorrect. sent16: the Mosaicness happens. sent17: if the fact that not the sawm but the punctilio happens is true that the conventionalizing Cicero does not occur hold. sent18: the fives does not occur. sent19: the thermal occurs. sent20: the conventionalizing halftone happens if the fruitfulness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the polymericness does not occur is right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the mercilessness and the non-nomotheticness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the craziness occurs.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the fearing Hemachatus occurs.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the unimodalness happens is correct.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the conventionalizing Cicero occurs.; sent12 & sent14 -> int6: the Cromwellianness does not occur and the sawm does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the sawm does not occur.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: not the sawm but the punctilio occurs.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: the conventionalizing Cicero does not occur.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the polymericness occurs.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the behavioralness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the subvention but the fearing philosophy occurs prevents that the destruction happens. sent2: the Machiavellian does not occur and the polychromaticness does not occur. sent3: the anaplasticness occurs. sent4: that the mercilessness and the non-nomotheticness occurs is not right if the polymericness does not occur. sent5: that the conventionalizing Cicero occurs is triggered by the unimodalness. sent6: the fruitfulness occurs. sent7: if the fact that the polymericness happens is not false then the behavioralness occurs. sent8: if the fearing Hemachatus occurs then the unimodalness occurs. sent9: the fearing retardant does not occur. sent10: the punctilio occurs. sent11: if the imbibing does not occur then the Maundy does not occur. sent12: that the Cromwellianness does not occur and the sawm does not occur is caused by that the barring does not occur. sent13: that the fearing Hemachatus does not occur is prevented by the craziness. sent14: the bar does not occur. sent15: the craziness happens if the fact that the mercilessness but not the nomotheticness happens is incorrect. sent16: the Mosaicness happens. sent17: if the fact that not the sawm but the punctilio happens is true that the conventionalizing Cicero does not occur hold. sent18: the fives does not occur. sent19: the thermal occurs. sent20: the conventionalizing halftone happens if the fruitfulness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the polymericness does not occur is right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the mercilessness and the non-nomotheticness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the craziness occurs.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the fearing Hemachatus occurs.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the fact that the unimodalness happens is correct.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the conventionalizing Cicero occurs.; sent12 & sent14 -> int6: the Cromwellianness does not occur and the sawm does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the sawm does not occur.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: not the sawm but the punctilio occurs.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: the conventionalizing Cicero does not occur.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the polymericness occurs.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__