the exotherm is not a worker.
sent1: if the trim does not article chaldron it is a kind of a comforts and is Democratic. sent2: the trim does disjoint and/or is not Alpine. sent3: there exists something such that it does comfort. sent4: that the trim does not disjoint or it is not Alpine or both is wrong. sent5: if something does not disjoint but it is Alpine then it is not a kind of a worker. sent6: the exotherm is not Democratic. sent7: the trim does not article chaldron. sent8: The chaldron does not article trim. sent9: the exotherm does not comfort and/or is not Sadducean if it does disjoint. sent10: the exotherm is a kind of a worker if there is something such that it disjoints and it comforts.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trim does not disjoint.; assump1 -> int1: the trim does not disjoint or it is not Alpine or both.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the trim disjoints.; sent1 & sent7 -> int4: the trim comforts and it is Democratic.; int4 -> int5: the trim is a kind of a comforts.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the trim does disjoint and does comfort.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does disjoint and is a comforts.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the exotherm does not comfort or is not Sadducean or both.
$hypothesis$ = the exotherm is not a worker. ; $context$ = sent1: if the trim does not article chaldron it is a kind of a comforts and is Democratic. sent2: the trim does disjoint and/or is not Alpine. sent3: there exists something such that it does comfort. sent4: that the trim does not disjoint or it is not Alpine or both is wrong. sent5: if something does not disjoint but it is Alpine then it is not a kind of a worker. sent6: the exotherm is not Democratic. sent7: the trim does not article chaldron. sent8: The chaldron does not article trim. sent9: the exotherm does not comfort and/or is not Sadducean if it does disjoint. sent10: the exotherm is a kind of a worker if there is something such that it disjoints and it comforts. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trim does not disjoint.; assump1 -> int1: the trim does not disjoint or it is not Alpine or both.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the trim disjoints.; sent1 & sent7 -> int4: the trim comforts and it is Democratic.; int4 -> int5: the trim is a kind of a comforts.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the trim does disjoint and does comfort.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does disjoint and is a comforts.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__