the licensee is not sociopathic.
sent1: the licensee is a gantlet if it glasses. sent2: that if something is papilliform then it does headquarter Catoptrophorus hold. sent3: The worm does fudge licensee. sent4: if something that does fudge Calycophyllum is a Condorcet the fact that it does not govern velvet is right. sent5: that the licensee does govern sneerer is right. sent6: if something does not fudge Ull it does go. sent7: either the leaseholder is a kind of a gone or it headquarters Catoptrophorus or both if there is something such that it headquarters Catoptrophorus. sent8: if something does not fudge worm but it does fudge Ull then the fact that it does fudge Pakistan is not incorrect. sent9: That the sneerer does govern licensee is right. sent10: everything is a kind of a bound. sent11: if there is something such that it governs sneerer the boarfish fudges worm and fudges Ull. sent12: the insufflation is papilliform if there exists something such that it is not non-distributional and it is syllogistic. sent13: something does not govern sneerer if it does fudge worm and fudges Ull. sent14: something is a attester that does not headquarter transposition if it does bind. sent15: the borax goes if the leaseholder does goes. sent16: the borax goes if the leaseholder does headquarter Catoptrophorus. sent17: the limonene governs sneerer. sent18: if the borax is a gone then it does govern sneerer. sent19: the licensee is an ionosphere. sent20: if the worm does not headquarter transposition then that the declination is distributional and it is syllogistic is not wrong. sent21: the licensee does fudge worm. sent22: that something is sociopathic is right if it goes.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the licensee fudges Ull is not incorrect.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the licensee does fudge worm and fudges Ull.; sent13 -> int2: if the licensee fudges worm and fudges Ull then it does not govern sneerer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the licensee does not govern sneerer.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the licensee does not fudge Ull.; sent6 -> int6: if the licensee does not fudge Ull then it goes.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the licensee goes.; sent22 -> int8: the licensee is sociopathic if it does go.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the limonene is a gone and it fudges Pakistan.
sent8 -> int9: if the limonene does not fudge worm but it fudges Ull then it fudges Pakistan.;
$hypothesis$ = the licensee is not sociopathic. ; $context$ = sent1: the licensee is a gantlet if it glasses. sent2: that if something is papilliform then it does headquarter Catoptrophorus hold. sent3: The worm does fudge licensee. sent4: if something that does fudge Calycophyllum is a Condorcet the fact that it does not govern velvet is right. sent5: that the licensee does govern sneerer is right. sent6: if something does not fudge Ull it does go. sent7: either the leaseholder is a kind of a gone or it headquarters Catoptrophorus or both if there is something such that it headquarters Catoptrophorus. sent8: if something does not fudge worm but it does fudge Ull then the fact that it does fudge Pakistan is not incorrect. sent9: That the sneerer does govern licensee is right. sent10: everything is a kind of a bound. sent11: if there is something such that it governs sneerer the boarfish fudges worm and fudges Ull. sent12: the insufflation is papilliform if there exists something such that it is not non-distributional and it is syllogistic. sent13: something does not govern sneerer if it does fudge worm and fudges Ull. sent14: something is a attester that does not headquarter transposition if it does bind. sent15: the borax goes if the leaseholder does goes. sent16: the borax goes if the leaseholder does headquarter Catoptrophorus. sent17: the limonene governs sneerer. sent18: if the borax is a gone then it does govern sneerer. sent19: the licensee is an ionosphere. sent20: if the worm does not headquarter transposition then that the declination is distributional and it is syllogistic is not wrong. sent21: the licensee does fudge worm. sent22: that something is sociopathic is right if it goes. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the licensee fudges Ull is not incorrect.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the licensee does fudge worm and fudges Ull.; sent13 -> int2: if the licensee fudges worm and fudges Ull then it does not govern sneerer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the licensee does not govern sneerer.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the licensee does not fudge Ull.; sent6 -> int6: if the licensee does not fudge Ull then it goes.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the licensee goes.; sent22 -> int8: the licensee is sociopathic if it does go.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__