the polonium does not smoothen.
sent1: if that something is lymphatic thing that is not a Devanagari is wrong then it does not recede. sent2: that something is not non-lymphatic and not a wine is false if it is a kind of a Devanagari. sent3: if the lough is not a futurology then that the payee is binucleate but it does not teach archiannelid is wrong. sent4: the fact that the cannibal is lymphatic is not wrong if the lough is a lumberman or it does not sediment nasality or both. sent5: if the payee is not lymphatic then the fact that the polonium does not smoothen is true. sent6: something is not lymphatic if that it is a kind of binucleate thing that does not teach archiannelid is not true. sent7: if there is something such that it does teach archiannelid and/or it is not binucleate then the distributor is a futurology. sent8: the distributor is not a Devanagari. sent9: the lough is a Maeandra. sent10: that the cannibal is Coleridgian thing that does not recede is wrong if the distributor is not a Devanagari. sent11: if the Anzac is not a kind of a colonial it is not maximal. sent12: if that the payee recedes and does not teach archiannelid does not hold then it is not a Devanagari. sent13: if that something is a futurology but not binucleate is not true then it does not smoothen. sent14: if that the cannibal is Coleridgian but it does not recede is not true then the fact that the lough is not a futurology is true. sent15: if the lough is a Maeandra it either is a kind of a lumberman or does not sediment nasality or both.
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the cannibal is a kind of Coleridgian thing that does not recede is incorrect is right.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: that the lough is not a futurology is true.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the payee is binucleate thing that does not teach archiannelid is not right.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the payee is binucleate but it does not teach archiannelid is incorrect then it is not lymphatic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the payee is not lymphatic.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the polonium smoothens.
sent15 & sent9 -> int6: the lough is a lumberman or it does not sediment nasality or both.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the cannibal is lymphatic.;
$hypothesis$ = the polonium does not smoothen. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is lymphatic thing that is not a Devanagari is wrong then it does not recede. sent2: that something is not non-lymphatic and not a wine is false if it is a kind of a Devanagari. sent3: if the lough is not a futurology then that the payee is binucleate but it does not teach archiannelid is wrong. sent4: the fact that the cannibal is lymphatic is not wrong if the lough is a lumberman or it does not sediment nasality or both. sent5: if the payee is not lymphatic then the fact that the polonium does not smoothen is true. sent6: something is not lymphatic if that it is a kind of binucleate thing that does not teach archiannelid is not true. sent7: if there is something such that it does teach archiannelid and/or it is not binucleate then the distributor is a futurology. sent8: the distributor is not a Devanagari. sent9: the lough is a Maeandra. sent10: that the cannibal is Coleridgian thing that does not recede is wrong if the distributor is not a Devanagari. sent11: if the Anzac is not a kind of a colonial it is not maximal. sent12: if that the payee recedes and does not teach archiannelid does not hold then it is not a Devanagari. sent13: if that something is a futurology but not binucleate is not true then it does not smoothen. sent14: if that the cannibal is Coleridgian but it does not recede is not true then the fact that the lough is not a futurology is true. sent15: if the lough is a Maeandra it either is a kind of a lumberman or does not sediment nasality or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the cannibal is a kind of Coleridgian thing that does not recede is incorrect is right.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: that the lough is not a futurology is true.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the payee is binucleate thing that does not teach archiannelid is not right.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the payee is binucleate but it does not teach archiannelid is incorrect then it is not lymphatic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the payee is not lymphatic.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__