the outdoorness does not occur.
sent1: the pruning occurs and/or the panhysterectomy occurs. sent2: the compaction does not occur. sent3: if the exclusiveness does not occur that the fact that the matureness does not occur but the compaction occurs does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the pastorship does not occur and the abasicness does not occur is wrong if the fact that the dealings happens is not incorrect. sent5: if the havoc happens and the outdoorness occurs then the pastorship does not occur. sent6: both the neoclassicist and the decolonizing wineglass happens. sent7: the exclusive does not occur if the exclusive does not occur and/or the running does not occur. sent8: if the fact that both the immatureness and the compaction occurs is not true then the Japanese occurs. sent9: that the mutation does not occur and the primeness does not occur is false if the scramming echocardiogram happens. sent10: both the non-abasicness and the non-matureness occurs. sent11: the havoc occurs if the decolonizing rurality occurs. sent12: that the exclusive does not occur or the running does not occur or both is caused by the non-oddness. sent13: the fact that the reelection does not occur hold. sent14: the havoc occurs if the neuralness occurs. sent15: the decolonizing rurality occurs or the neuralness happens or both.
sent15 & sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the havoc occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the outdoorness occurs is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the havoc and the outdoorness happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the pastorship does not occur.; sent10 -> int4: the abasicness does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pastorship does not occur and the abasicness does not occur.;
the outdoorness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the outdoorness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the pruning occurs and/or the panhysterectomy occurs. sent2: the compaction does not occur. sent3: if the exclusiveness does not occur that the fact that the matureness does not occur but the compaction occurs does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the pastorship does not occur and the abasicness does not occur is wrong if the fact that the dealings happens is not incorrect. sent5: if the havoc happens and the outdoorness occurs then the pastorship does not occur. sent6: both the neoclassicist and the decolonizing wineglass happens. sent7: the exclusive does not occur if the exclusive does not occur and/or the running does not occur. sent8: if the fact that both the immatureness and the compaction occurs is not true then the Japanese occurs. sent9: that the mutation does not occur and the primeness does not occur is false if the scramming echocardiogram happens. sent10: both the non-abasicness and the non-matureness occurs. sent11: the havoc occurs if the decolonizing rurality occurs. sent12: that the exclusive does not occur or the running does not occur or both is caused by the non-oddness. sent13: the fact that the reelection does not occur hold. sent14: the havoc occurs if the neuralness occurs. sent15: the decolonizing rurality occurs or the neuralness happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the havoc occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the outdoorness occurs is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the havoc and the outdoorness happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the pastorship does not occur.; sent10 -> int4: the abasicness does not occur.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pastorship does not occur and the abasicness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__