the numismatist revives if the promiscuity premises feijoa.
sent1: there exists something such that either it is not a pluralization or it is not foolish or both. sent2: that the Malay is a pluralization is correct. sent3: the fact that the Malay is a acclimatization is true. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a pluralization or is not foolish or both is not incorrect does not hold the promiscuity does not premise feijoa. sent5: the fact that the estuary is achromatic and is not a Hinayanist does not hold. sent6: if the numismatist does not revive that that the nacho is achromatic but it is not a kind of a acclimatization is not false does not hold. sent7: if the nacho is not achromatic then the estuary is a kind of a Hinayanist. sent8: the numismatist premises feijoa. sent9: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a pluralization or it is foolish or both is not true. sent10: if there is something such that that either it is a pluralization or it is not foolish or both is not correct then the promiscuity does not premise feijoa. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a pluralization. sent12: if there is something such that that either it is not a pluralization or it is not foolish or both is wrong the promiscuity does premise feijoa. sent13: if the fact that the fact that the nacho is achromatic and is not a acclimatization is not true hold then the estuary is a kind of a Hinayanist.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the promiscuity does premise feijoa.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the numismatist does not revive.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the nacho is achromatic but not a acclimatization is incorrect.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the estuary is a Hinayanist.;
$hypothesis$ = the numismatist revives if the promiscuity premises feijoa. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that either it is not a pluralization or it is not foolish or both. sent2: that the Malay is a pluralization is correct. sent3: the fact that the Malay is a acclimatization is true. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a pluralization or is not foolish or both is not incorrect does not hold the promiscuity does not premise feijoa. sent5: the fact that the estuary is achromatic and is not a Hinayanist does not hold. sent6: if the numismatist does not revive that that the nacho is achromatic but it is not a kind of a acclimatization is not false does not hold. sent7: if the nacho is not achromatic then the estuary is a kind of a Hinayanist. sent8: the numismatist premises feijoa. sent9: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a pluralization or it is foolish or both is not true. sent10: if there is something such that that either it is a pluralization or it is not foolish or both is not correct then the promiscuity does not premise feijoa. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a pluralization. sent12: if there is something such that that either it is not a pluralization or it is not foolish or both is wrong the promiscuity does premise feijoa. sent13: if the fact that the fact that the nacho is achromatic and is not a acclimatization is not true hold then the estuary is a kind of a Hinayanist. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the promiscuity does premise feijoa.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the numismatist does not revive.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the nacho is achromatic but not a acclimatization is incorrect.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the estuary is a Hinayanist.; __UNKNOWN__