the green does not occur and the unveiling secessionism does not occur if the fact that the intention occurs is not false.
sent1: the asteroidalness does not occur if that that the self-induction but not the intention occurs hold is wrong. sent2: either the unveiling secessionism happens or the unveiling snowdrop does not occur or both if the devastating occurs. sent3: the self-induction occurs. sent4: that the unveiling snowdrop occurs is prevented by that the unveiling secessionism occurs and/or the unveiling snowdrop does not occur. sent5: the fact that the malarialness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: if the millenarianness does not occur the windfall does not occur and the electromotiveness does not occur. sent7: the devastating does not occur. sent8: that the ace occurs prevents that the devastating does not occur. sent9: the greening does not occur if both the self-induction and the intention happens. sent10: the unveiling secessionism does not occur and the devastating does not occur if the malarialness does not occur. sent11: the apologeticsness happens. sent12: both the calcificness and the uttering fireboat occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intention occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the self-induction occurs and the intention occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the greenness does not occur.; sent10 & sent5 -> int3: the unveiling secessionism does not occur and the devastating does not occur.; int3 -> int4: that the unveiling secessionism does not occur is not wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the greening does not occur and the unveiling secessionism does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the unveiling snowdrop does not occur and the asteroidalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the green does not occur and the unveiling secessionism does not occur if the fact that the intention occurs is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the asteroidalness does not occur if that that the self-induction but not the intention occurs hold is wrong. sent2: either the unveiling secessionism happens or the unveiling snowdrop does not occur or both if the devastating occurs. sent3: the self-induction occurs. sent4: that the unveiling snowdrop occurs is prevented by that the unveiling secessionism occurs and/or the unveiling snowdrop does not occur. sent5: the fact that the malarialness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: if the millenarianness does not occur the windfall does not occur and the electromotiveness does not occur. sent7: the devastating does not occur. sent8: that the ace occurs prevents that the devastating does not occur. sent9: the greening does not occur if both the self-induction and the intention happens. sent10: the unveiling secessionism does not occur and the devastating does not occur if the malarialness does not occur. sent11: the apologeticsness happens. sent12: both the calcificness and the uttering fireboat occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intention occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the self-induction occurs and the intention occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the greenness does not occur.; sent10 & sent5 -> int3: the unveiling secessionism does not occur and the devastating does not occur.; int3 -> int4: that the unveiling secessionism does not occur is not wrong.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the greening does not occur and the unveiling secessionism does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__