that there exists something such that if it is not ergotropic the fact that it is not a tot and is not centesimal is wrong hold.
sent1: if something is not a heavyweight then the fact that it is not finite and does not contemplate ADP is not right. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it does not elaborate is not false that it is not a workflow and is not a bisexual is false. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a peptization that it is both not Taiwanese and not a strand is false. sent4: if the plastique is not ergotropic that it is both not a tot and centesimal is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does not contemplate stomp is not incorrect that it is not a fireboat and not isolationist is false. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is non-ergotropic hold then the fact that it is not a tot and it is not centesimal is true. sent7: there is something such that if it is ergotropic the fact that it is both not a tot and not centesimal does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is not admissible the fact that it does not contemplate ADP and it is not a kind of a lava is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if that it does not straighten Frederick is true then that it is not a bohrium and it is not thermionics is false. sent10: the fact that the plastique is not a kind of a tot and it is not centesimal is wrong if that it is not ergotropic is not false. sent11: the fact that the plastique is not a kind of an intangible and it is non-laryngopharyngeal is false if that it is not a kind of a detox is not false. sent12: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not push glassware the fact that it does not contemplate place and it is not a prosecution is not true is not false. sent13: if the plastique is not ergotropic that it is a kind of a tot that is not centesimal does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is non-ergotropic the fact that it is not a kind of a tot and it is centesimal is not right. sent15: if the plastique is not ergotropic then it is not a kind of a tot and it is not centesimal. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not unreactive the fact that it does not push Apogon and does not push hemiplegic is not right. sent17: there is something such that if it is not ergotropic then the fact that it is a kind of a tot that is non-centesimal does not hold. sent18: the fact that the plastique is both not a tot and non-centesimal is false if it is ergotropic.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the camcorder is not finite and does not contemplate ADP is wrong if it is not a heavyweight.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not ergotropic the fact that it is not a tot and is not centesimal is wrong hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a heavyweight then the fact that it is not finite and does not contemplate ADP is not right. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it does not elaborate is not false that it is not a workflow and is not a bisexual is false. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a peptization that it is both not Taiwanese and not a strand is false. sent4: if the plastique is not ergotropic that it is both not a tot and centesimal is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does not contemplate stomp is not incorrect that it is not a fireboat and not isolationist is false. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is non-ergotropic hold then the fact that it is not a tot and it is not centesimal is true. sent7: there is something such that if it is ergotropic the fact that it is both not a tot and not centesimal does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is not admissible the fact that it does not contemplate ADP and it is not a kind of a lava is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if that it does not straighten Frederick is true then that it is not a bohrium and it is not thermionics is false. sent10: the fact that the plastique is not a kind of a tot and it is not centesimal is wrong if that it is not ergotropic is not false. sent11: the fact that the plastique is not a kind of an intangible and it is non-laryngopharyngeal is false if that it is not a kind of a detox is not false. sent12: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not push glassware the fact that it does not contemplate place and it is not a prosecution is not true is not false. sent13: if the plastique is not ergotropic that it is a kind of a tot that is not centesimal does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is non-ergotropic the fact that it is not a kind of a tot and it is centesimal is not right. sent15: if the plastique is not ergotropic then it is not a kind of a tot and it is not centesimal. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not unreactive the fact that it does not push Apogon and does not push hemiplegic is not right. sent17: there is something such that if it is not ergotropic then the fact that it is a kind of a tot that is non-centesimal does not hold. sent18: the fact that the plastique is both not a tot and non-centesimal is false if it is ergotropic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__