the sandfish is not a carcase.
sent1: the fact that something is a latest that does rage is incorrect if it does not cloy circus. sent2: the turban underquotes degree and does deepen. sent3: the wing does not approbate chokedamp and is unsystematic. sent4: if that something does not approbate rennin is not false then it is passionate and is a Shinto. sent5: the sandfish is a currency. sent6: if the wing does not approbate chokedamp that the holophyte is both not a nodule and Gilbertian does not hold. sent7: if that the porphyrin does not approbate sandfish and is not a kind of a currency does not hold then the lurker deepens. sent8: something is not a kind of a currency and it is not a kind of a carcase if it does not approbate sandfish. sent9: if the thermohydrometer is passionate then the fact that the rennin is meningeal but it is not a glyptography is not true. sent10: the thermohydrometer is passionate if the holophyte is passionate. sent11: the sandfish works. sent12: the pectin does deepen and it does approbate rennin. sent13: if that the Bengali is latest and is a kind of a rage is not true then the rockfish is not a kind of a likeness. sent14: if the fact that the sandfish is a carcase hold then it does not deepen. sent15: the wing is a likeness and is a carcase. sent16: the sandfish is a currency that deepens. sent17: if the lurker does deepen then the sandfish is a kind of a carcase. sent18: the fact that the porphyrin does not approbate sandfish and it is not a kind of a currency is not right if the rockfish is not a likeness. sent19: the moccasin is a carcase and it is a Orleanism. sent20: something does not approbate rennin if that it is not a kind of a nodule and it is Gilbertian is wrong. sent21: the heron does not cloy circus if there exists something such that that it is meningeal and is not a kind of a glyptography is not right. sent22: the sandfish is a Acrostichum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sandfish is a kind of a carcase.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sandfish does not deepen is not false.; sent16 -> int2: the sandfish does deepen.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the sandfish is a carcase.
sent1 -> int4: that the Bengali is a kind of a latest that rages is not correct if it does not cloy circus.; sent4 -> int5: the holophyte is a kind of passionate a Shinto if the fact that it does not approbate rennin hold.; sent20 -> int6: the holophyte does not approbate rennin if that it is not a nodule and is Gilbertian is not correct.; sent3 -> int7: the wing does not approbate chokedamp.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the holophyte is not a nodule but it is Gilbertian is not true.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the holophyte does not approbate rennin.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the holophyte is passionate and is a kind of a Shinto.; int10 -> int11: the holophyte is passionate.; sent10 & int11 -> int12: the thermohydrometer is passionate.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: that the rennin is meningeal thing that is not a glyptography is false.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it is not non-meningeal and not a glyptography is incorrect.; int14 & sent21 -> int15: the heron does not cloy circus.; int15 -> int16: the heron does not cloy circus and/or it is not scalic.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that either it does not cloy circus or it is not scalic or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the sandfish is not a carcase. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a latest that does rage is incorrect if it does not cloy circus. sent2: the turban underquotes degree and does deepen. sent3: the wing does not approbate chokedamp and is unsystematic. sent4: if that something does not approbate rennin is not false then it is passionate and is a Shinto. sent5: the sandfish is a currency. sent6: if the wing does not approbate chokedamp that the holophyte is both not a nodule and Gilbertian does not hold. sent7: if that the porphyrin does not approbate sandfish and is not a kind of a currency does not hold then the lurker deepens. sent8: something is not a kind of a currency and it is not a kind of a carcase if it does not approbate sandfish. sent9: if the thermohydrometer is passionate then the fact that the rennin is meningeal but it is not a glyptography is not true. sent10: the thermohydrometer is passionate if the holophyte is passionate. sent11: the sandfish works. sent12: the pectin does deepen and it does approbate rennin. sent13: if that the Bengali is latest and is a kind of a rage is not true then the rockfish is not a kind of a likeness. sent14: if the fact that the sandfish is a carcase hold then it does not deepen. sent15: the wing is a likeness and is a carcase. sent16: the sandfish is a currency that deepens. sent17: if the lurker does deepen then the sandfish is a kind of a carcase. sent18: the fact that the porphyrin does not approbate sandfish and it is not a kind of a currency is not right if the rockfish is not a likeness. sent19: the moccasin is a carcase and it is a Orleanism. sent20: something does not approbate rennin if that it is not a kind of a nodule and it is Gilbertian is wrong. sent21: the heron does not cloy circus if there exists something such that that it is meningeal and is not a kind of a glyptography is not right. sent22: the sandfish is a Acrostichum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sandfish is a kind of a carcase.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sandfish does not deepen is not false.; sent16 -> int2: the sandfish does deepen.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__