the placoderm is not a Bronx.
sent1: the fact that the placoderm is covalent hold if it is a kind of a Bronx. sent2: if the nanny is not a kind of a PIE the grunter is a Hooke and it is a Coptic. sent3: the nearside is postictal if a non-discomycetous thing is not a Passover. sent4: the uakari is denominational. sent5: the placoderm is a Passover. sent6: if that the duce is not yogistic and/or it is not a PIE is not right then the nanny is not a PIE. sent7: either the placoderm is mitral or it is Latin or both. sent8: if the placoderm is covalent or offers nearside or both then it is not a kind of a Linotype. sent9: the placoderm is a Coptic and is shapely. sent10: the placoderm is a kind of a Passover and it is postictal. sent11: the heliograph is a Hydrochoeridae. sent12: the duce is otic if the heliograph is otic. sent13: if the grunter is a kind of a Coptic the hypsometer is both not discomycetous and not a Passover. sent14: the Bercy is not postictal if it either is a kind of a sick or is abaxial or both. sent15: if the fact that the heliograph is a Hydrochoeridae hold then it is otic. sent16: the caiman is a kind of a Passover. sent17: something is not denominational if that it is a Passover or is a Bronx or both is right. sent18: the placoderm is not postictal if the fact that it is denominational hold. sent19: that something is not postictal is not wrong if it is denominational and/or covalent. sent20: if that the placoderm is a deflector and/or it is a kind of a Hydrochoeridae is correct it is not covalent. sent21: the fact that the duce is non-yogistic and/or is not a PIE is not true if it is otic. sent22: the maxi is not postictal. sent23: something is not postictal if it is denominational.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the placoderm is a kind of a Bronx.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the placoderm is covalent.; int1 -> int2: either the placoderm is denominational or it is covalent or both.; sent19 -> int3: the placoderm is not postictal if either it is denominational or it is covalent or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the placoderm is not postictal.; sent10 -> int5: that the placoderm is postictal is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the placoderm is a kind of a Bronx.
sent15 & sent11 -> int7: the heliograph is otic.; sent12 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the duce is otic is right.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the duce is not yogistic and/or is not a PIE is not correct.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the nanny is not a PIE.; sent2 & int10 -> int11: the grunter is a kind of a Hooke that is a Coptic.; int11 -> int12: the grunter is a Coptic.; sent13 & int12 -> int13: the hypsometer is not discomycetous and it is not a kind of a Passover.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is both not discomycetous and not a Passover.; int14 & sent3 -> int15: the fact that the fact that the nearside is not postictal is not false is not true.; int15 -> int16: something is postictal.;
$hypothesis$ = the placoderm is not a Bronx. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the placoderm is covalent hold if it is a kind of a Bronx. sent2: if the nanny is not a kind of a PIE the grunter is a Hooke and it is a Coptic. sent3: the nearside is postictal if a non-discomycetous thing is not a Passover. sent4: the uakari is denominational. sent5: the placoderm is a Passover. sent6: if that the duce is not yogistic and/or it is not a PIE is not right then the nanny is not a PIE. sent7: either the placoderm is mitral or it is Latin or both. sent8: if the placoderm is covalent or offers nearside or both then it is not a kind of a Linotype. sent9: the placoderm is a Coptic and is shapely. sent10: the placoderm is a kind of a Passover and it is postictal. sent11: the heliograph is a Hydrochoeridae. sent12: the duce is otic if the heliograph is otic. sent13: if the grunter is a kind of a Coptic the hypsometer is both not discomycetous and not a Passover. sent14: the Bercy is not postictal if it either is a kind of a sick or is abaxial or both. sent15: if the fact that the heliograph is a Hydrochoeridae hold then it is otic. sent16: the caiman is a kind of a Passover. sent17: something is not denominational if that it is a Passover or is a Bronx or both is right. sent18: the placoderm is not postictal if the fact that it is denominational hold. sent19: that something is not postictal is not wrong if it is denominational and/or covalent. sent20: if that the placoderm is a deflector and/or it is a kind of a Hydrochoeridae is correct it is not covalent. sent21: the fact that the duce is non-yogistic and/or is not a PIE is not true if it is otic. sent22: the maxi is not postictal. sent23: something is not postictal if it is denominational. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the placoderm is a kind of a Bronx.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the placoderm is covalent.; int1 -> int2: either the placoderm is denominational or it is covalent or both.; sent19 -> int3: the placoderm is not postictal if either it is denominational or it is covalent or both.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the placoderm is not postictal.; sent10 -> int5: that the placoderm is postictal is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__