that the sulfisoxazole does not gelatinize and is not a kind of an astrophysicist is not correct if the projectile is not euphonic.
sent1: if something does not last then it is not a kind of a youth. sent2: the projectile is not classical. sent3: if the sulfisoxazole does not gelatinize and it is not euphonic the projectile is an astrophysicist. sent4: the fact that that the projectile is not an astrophysicist but it is euphonic is not right if the sulfisoxazole does not gelatinize is not false. sent5: the fact that the projectile gelatinizes but it is not a Maoist is false. sent6: if the sulfisoxazole is non-euphonic thing that does gelatinize the projectile is an astrophysicist. sent7: that the projectile is euphonic hold if the sulfisoxazole does gelatinize but it is not an astrophysicist. sent8: something that is not a youth is a kind of a phytohormone that is not oviparous. sent9: if something is a kind of a phytohormone that is not oviparous then the fact that it is not euphonic is not wrong. sent10: if the projectile does not gelatinize and is an astrophysicist then the sulfisoxazole is euphonic. sent11: the fact that the sulfisoxazole is euphonic thing that does not gelatinize is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sulfisoxazole does not gelatinize and is not an astrophysicist.;
the boarding is not euphonic.
sent9 -> int1: if the boarding is a phytohormone that is not oviparous then the fact that it is not euphonic hold.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the boarding is a phytohormone but it is not oviparous hold if it is not a kind of a youth.; sent1 -> int3: the boarding is not a youth if it does not last.;
$hypothesis$ = that the sulfisoxazole does not gelatinize and is not a kind of an astrophysicist is not correct if the projectile is not euphonic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not last then it is not a kind of a youth. sent2: the projectile is not classical. sent3: if the sulfisoxazole does not gelatinize and it is not euphonic the projectile is an astrophysicist. sent4: the fact that that the projectile is not an astrophysicist but it is euphonic is not right if the sulfisoxazole does not gelatinize is not false. sent5: the fact that the projectile gelatinizes but it is not a Maoist is false. sent6: if the sulfisoxazole is non-euphonic thing that does gelatinize the projectile is an astrophysicist. sent7: that the projectile is euphonic hold if the sulfisoxazole does gelatinize but it is not an astrophysicist. sent8: something that is not a youth is a kind of a phytohormone that is not oviparous. sent9: if something is a kind of a phytohormone that is not oviparous then the fact that it is not euphonic is not wrong. sent10: if the projectile does not gelatinize and is an astrophysicist then the sulfisoxazole is euphonic. sent11: the fact that the sulfisoxazole is euphonic thing that does not gelatinize is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sulfisoxazole does not gelatinize and is not an astrophysicist.; __UNKNOWN__