the fact that if the buffer miffs the stole does not lecture uncongeniality but it is categorial does not hold.
sent1: the buffer is categorial and it miffs if there is something such that it lectures uncongeniality. sent2: if something does miff then it is not a kind of a Poyang and it is aversive. sent3: the stole does not lecture uncongeniality but it is categorial if there is something such that it miffs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the buffer does miff is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it does miff.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the stole does not lecture uncongeniality but it is categorial.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the stole is not a kind of a Poyang but it is aversive.
sent2 -> int3: the stole is not a Poyang but it is aversive if it does miff.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the buffer miffs the stole does not lecture uncongeniality but it is categorial does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the buffer is categorial and it miffs if there is something such that it lectures uncongeniality. sent2: if something does miff then it is not a kind of a Poyang and it is aversive. sent3: the stole does not lecture uncongeniality but it is categorial if there is something such that it miffs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the buffer does miff is not wrong.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it does miff.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the stole does not lecture uncongeniality but it is categorial.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__