that there exists something such that if the fact that it claps deficit and it does not clap taps is not true then it is not a kind of an oxidant is not true.
sent1: the ammeter is not a kind of an oxidant if it claps deficit and it does not clap taps. sent2: if that the ammeter does clap taps but it is not a Wiesenthal does not hold it is not catadromous. sent3: if that something chromes but it is not liberal is not right then it is not ossiferous. sent4: something is not an oxidant if that it does clap deficit and does not clap taps is not right.
sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the ammeter does clap deficit and does not clap taps is not correct that it is not an oxidant is not wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it claps deficit and it does not clap taps is not true then it is not a kind of an oxidant is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the ammeter is not a kind of an oxidant if it claps deficit and it does not clap taps. sent2: if that the ammeter does clap taps but it is not a Wiesenthal does not hold it is not catadromous. sent3: if that something chromes but it is not liberal is not right then it is not ossiferous. sent4: something is not an oxidant if that it does clap deficit and does not clap taps is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the ammeter does clap deficit and does not clap taps is not correct that it is not an oxidant is not wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__