the fact that that the smut is flimsy but it is nonpregnant is wrong if the pill does blue parsonage is not true.
sent1: that the smut is not the lockup if the fact that the smut is not flimsy but it does blue parsonage does not hold is not incorrect. sent2: if the pill does not blue parsonage then that the prion is nonpregnant thing that does derail is not true. sent3: if the pill is not a kind of a hatmaker the fact that the smut is a kind of a hatmaker and it is pregnant does not hold. sent4: the lorchel does not wrestle silverware if the fact that it is a fireball and memorializes cyproheptadine is not correct. sent5: if the lorchel is not flimsy the fact that the smut is both flimsy and not pregnant is not true. sent6: that the fact that the pill is not a silence but it is pregnant is not right is not wrong. sent7: something does not blue parsonage if that it blue parsonage and is not flimsy does not hold. sent8: the fact that the pill is not a hatmaker but a lockup is not true. sent9: if that the pill is not a hatmaker and is a lockup is not right that it does not wrestle silverware hold. sent10: the lorchel is not flimsy if something does blue parsonage and does not wrestle silverware.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pill blues parsonage is not wrong.; sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the pill does not wrestle silverware.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the pill does blue parsonage and does not wrestle silverware.; int2 -> int3: something does blue parsonage and does not wrestle silverware.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the lorchel is not flimsy.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the smut is flimsy and nonpregnant does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the prion is not pregnant and does derail hold is wrong.
sent7 -> int6: the pill does not blue parsonage if the fact that it does blue parsonage and is not flimsy does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the smut is flimsy but it is nonpregnant is wrong if the pill does blue parsonage is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the smut is not the lockup if the fact that the smut is not flimsy but it does blue parsonage does not hold is not incorrect. sent2: if the pill does not blue parsonage then that the prion is nonpregnant thing that does derail is not true. sent3: if the pill is not a kind of a hatmaker the fact that the smut is a kind of a hatmaker and it is pregnant does not hold. sent4: the lorchel does not wrestle silverware if the fact that it is a fireball and memorializes cyproheptadine is not correct. sent5: if the lorchel is not flimsy the fact that the smut is both flimsy and not pregnant is not true. sent6: that the fact that the pill is not a silence but it is pregnant is not right is not wrong. sent7: something does not blue parsonage if that it blue parsonage and is not flimsy does not hold. sent8: the fact that the pill is not a hatmaker but a lockup is not true. sent9: if that the pill is not a hatmaker and is a lockup is not right that it does not wrestle silverware hold. sent10: the lorchel is not flimsy if something does blue parsonage and does not wrestle silverware. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pill blues parsonage is not wrong.; sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the pill does not wrestle silverware.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the pill does blue parsonage and does not wrestle silverware.; int2 -> int3: something does blue parsonage and does not wrestle silverware.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the lorchel is not flimsy.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the smut is flimsy and nonpregnant does not hold.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__