that the Dewar is absorbable and it is fermentable hold.
sent1: the parliamentarian is a Cameroonian and it emblazons Locke. sent2: something that does not force is not a comparative and revenges anapest. sent3: if that the facilitator does stridulate is not false then the Dewar is absorbable. sent4: the parliamentarian emblazons wok if the fact that it is non-comparative thing that does revenge anapest hold. sent5: The thundershower does emblazon bondage. sent6: the Dewar does stridulate if the facilitator is absorbable. sent7: the bondage does pitch if it emblazons thundershower. sent8: the bondage does emblazon thundershower. sent9: something is fermentable if it emblazons thundershower. sent10: the bondage is fermentable. sent11: the bondage is credible. sent12: the parliamentarian is not a force. sent13: the facilitator is not a kind of a pitching if that the introduction is a pitching that does stridulate is false. sent14: that the Dewar is not non-Buddhist is right. sent15: the facilitator emblazons thundershower. sent16: if something emblazons wok and is Cameroonian then it is not credible. sent17: the fact that the bed emblazons thundershower and is a circumcision is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a pitching. sent18: the bed is a circumcision if the bondage is a kind of a pitching. sent19: if the bed is a circumcision the facilitator stridulates. sent20: if the parliamentarian is not credible the fact that the introduction does pitch and it does stridulate is not true. sent21: the Dewar is credible. sent22: the airs does emblazon thundershower. sent23: the Dewar is a kind of a pitching.
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: that the bondage is a kind of a pitching is correct.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the bed is a kind of a circumcision.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the facilitator does stridulate.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the Dewar is absorbable.;
that the Dewar is absorbable and it is fermentable is false.
sent16 -> int5: if the parliamentarian emblazons wok and is a kind of a Cameroonian then it is not credible.; sent2 -> int6: if the parliamentarian is not a kind of a force it is non-comparative and it revenges anapest.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the parliamentarian is a kind of non-comparative thing that does revenge anapest.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the parliamentarian does emblazon wok.; sent1 -> int9: the parliamentarian is a Cameroonian.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the parliamentarian emblazons wok and it is a Cameroonian.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the parliamentarian is not credible.; sent20 & int11 -> int12: that that the introduction does pitch and stridulates is right is incorrect.; sent13 & int12 -> int13: that the facilitator is not a pitching hold.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not a pitching.; int14 & sent17 -> int15: that the bed does emblazon thundershower and is a circumcision is wrong.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that the fact that that it does emblazon thundershower and it is a kind of a circumcision is correct is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Dewar is absorbable and it is fermentable hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the parliamentarian is a Cameroonian and it emblazons Locke. sent2: something that does not force is not a comparative and revenges anapest. sent3: if that the facilitator does stridulate is not false then the Dewar is absorbable. sent4: the parliamentarian emblazons wok if the fact that it is non-comparative thing that does revenge anapest hold. sent5: The thundershower does emblazon bondage. sent6: the Dewar does stridulate if the facilitator is absorbable. sent7: the bondage does pitch if it emblazons thundershower. sent8: the bondage does emblazon thundershower. sent9: something is fermentable if it emblazons thundershower. sent10: the bondage is fermentable. sent11: the bondage is credible. sent12: the parliamentarian is not a force. sent13: the facilitator is not a kind of a pitching if that the introduction is a pitching that does stridulate is false. sent14: that the Dewar is not non-Buddhist is right. sent15: the facilitator emblazons thundershower. sent16: if something emblazons wok and is Cameroonian then it is not credible. sent17: the fact that the bed emblazons thundershower and is a circumcision is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a pitching. sent18: the bed is a circumcision if the bondage is a kind of a pitching. sent19: if the bed is a circumcision the facilitator stridulates. sent20: if the parliamentarian is not credible the fact that the introduction does pitch and it does stridulate is not true. sent21: the Dewar is credible. sent22: the airs does emblazon thundershower. sent23: the Dewar is a kind of a pitching. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: that the bondage is a kind of a pitching is correct.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the bed is a kind of a circumcision.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the facilitator does stridulate.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the Dewar is absorbable.; __UNKNOWN__