that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not prenatal and/or it is aeriferous is not correct.
sent1: the girl is a scull. sent2: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is a hryvnia then that that the sawyer does not generate or it is prenatal or both is not wrong is not correct. sent3: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is apomictic. sent4: something that is not a creepy-crawlies is a kind of aeriferous thing that does generate. sent5: the sawyer does generate. sent6: the sawyer is a hryvnia if the girl does generate. sent7: the mount is prenatal. sent8: the proenzyme is a kind of a glockenspiel but it is not Ecuadorian. sent9: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is autumnal. sent10: the dilator is a hryvnia and not non-Tanzanian. sent11: the fact that the girl is aeriferous is right. sent12: the fact that that the dudeen does not jiggle songstress and/or it is unpronounceable is right is not correct. sent13: the girl is a hryvnia. sent14: the fact that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not prenatal or not non-aeriferous or both is false if the sawyer is a kind of a hryvnia. sent15: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is prenatal and it is a hryvnia. sent16: if that the bap is prenatal but it is not a hryvnia does not hold it is not a kind of a creepy-crawlies. sent17: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is prenatal. sent18: that either the girl is not a kind of a creepy-crawlies or it is prenatal or both is false. sent19: the girl does generate and is a creepy-crawlies. sent20: the works is a hryvnia.
sent19 -> int1: the girl does generate.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the sawyer is a kind of a hryvnia.; sent14 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not prenatal and/or it is aeriferous.
sent8 -> int3: the proenzyme is a glockenspiel.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is a glockenspiel is true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not prenatal and/or it is aeriferous is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the girl is a scull. sent2: if the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is a hryvnia then that that the sawyer does not generate or it is prenatal or both is not wrong is not correct. sent3: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is apomictic. sent4: something that is not a creepy-crawlies is a kind of aeriferous thing that does generate. sent5: the sawyer does generate. sent6: the sawyer is a hryvnia if the girl does generate. sent7: the mount is prenatal. sent8: the proenzyme is a kind of a glockenspiel but it is not Ecuadorian. sent9: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is autumnal. sent10: the dilator is a hryvnia and not non-Tanzanian. sent11: the fact that the girl is aeriferous is right. sent12: the fact that that the dudeen does not jiggle songstress and/or it is unpronounceable is right is not correct. sent13: the girl is a hryvnia. sent14: the fact that the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is not prenatal or not non-aeriferous or both is false if the sawyer is a kind of a hryvnia. sent15: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is prenatal and it is a hryvnia. sent16: if that the bap is prenatal but it is not a hryvnia does not hold it is not a kind of a creepy-crawlies. sent17: the hydrochlorofluorocarbon is prenatal. sent18: that either the girl is not a kind of a creepy-crawlies or it is prenatal or both is false. sent19: the girl does generate and is a creepy-crawlies. sent20: the works is a hryvnia. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the girl does generate.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the sawyer is a kind of a hryvnia.; sent14 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__