the fact that the waterproof is a Psophocarpus is not incorrect.
sent1: that the waterproof is a kind of a compote and it circles Mutawa'een is not right if it is a totem. sent2: the fact that the waterproof is a Psophocarpus is correct if that the skibob is not a totem and it is not a condonation is not correct. sent3: if something that is a kind of a Psophocarpus does evaluate then it is not a kind of a totem. sent4: if the jonquil does circle Mutawa'een the fact that it is not viscometric is not wrong. sent5: if that the waterproof does not award skibob but it is antistrophic does not hold then the fact that it does not circle Mutawa'een hold. sent6: something that either is a condonation or is not a totem or both is not a totem. sent7: if that the waterproof is not a kind of a compote and does circle Mutawa'een does not hold it is not a kind of a Psophocarpus. sent8: that the waterproof is not a totem is not true. sent9: that the waterproof is a compote and it circles Mutawa'een is not correct. sent10: the rockrose does not circle Mutawa'een. sent11: that the waterproof is not a monomaniac and scrapes is wrong if it is a kind of a links. sent12: something does evaluate if it awards pug. sent13: if that something does not award pug and does not obscure demantoid does not hold it does award pug. sent14: the waterproof is not a kind of a Psophocarpus if it is a kind of a compote. sent15: something that does evaluate is a kind of a condonation. sent16: that the waterproof is not cryptanalytic and circles Mutawa'een is wrong. sent17: that the waterproof does content and does circle stinker does not hold if it does circle Mutawa'een. sent18: if the waterproof is a totem then that it is not a compote and it circles Mutawa'een is false. sent19: if something is not a totem either the stinker is a condonation or it is not a kind of a totem or both.
sent18 & sent8 -> int1: that the waterproof is not a kind of a compote but it circles Mutawa'een is false.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the waterproof is a Psophocarpus.
sent15 -> int2: if the whalesucker does evaluate that it is not a condonation is incorrect.; sent12 -> int3: the whalesucker evaluates if it awards pug.; sent13 -> int4: if that the whalesucker does not award pug and does not obscure demantoid is not right it does award pug.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the waterproof is a Psophocarpus is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the waterproof is a kind of a compote and it circles Mutawa'een is not right if it is a totem. sent2: the fact that the waterproof is a Psophocarpus is correct if that the skibob is not a totem and it is not a condonation is not correct. sent3: if something that is a kind of a Psophocarpus does evaluate then it is not a kind of a totem. sent4: if the jonquil does circle Mutawa'een the fact that it is not viscometric is not wrong. sent5: if that the waterproof does not award skibob but it is antistrophic does not hold then the fact that it does not circle Mutawa'een hold. sent6: something that either is a condonation or is not a totem or both is not a totem. sent7: if that the waterproof is not a kind of a compote and does circle Mutawa'een does not hold it is not a kind of a Psophocarpus. sent8: that the waterproof is not a totem is not true. sent9: that the waterproof is a compote and it circles Mutawa'een is not correct. sent10: the rockrose does not circle Mutawa'een. sent11: that the waterproof is not a monomaniac and scrapes is wrong if it is a kind of a links. sent12: something does evaluate if it awards pug. sent13: if that something does not award pug and does not obscure demantoid does not hold it does award pug. sent14: the waterproof is not a kind of a Psophocarpus if it is a kind of a compote. sent15: something that does evaluate is a kind of a condonation. sent16: that the waterproof is not cryptanalytic and circles Mutawa'een is wrong. sent17: that the waterproof does content and does circle stinker does not hold if it does circle Mutawa'een. sent18: if the waterproof is a totem then that it is not a compote and it circles Mutawa'een is false. sent19: if something is not a totem either the stinker is a condonation or it is not a kind of a totem or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent8 -> int1: that the waterproof is not a kind of a compote but it circles Mutawa'een is false.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__