there exists something such that it is not a poke.
sent1: the edmontosaurus is not a poke if the fact that it does guard Bornean and is not insectivorous is not true. sent2: the fact that the glowworm idealizes Galbulidae is correct. sent3: the glowworm is a adsorbate and idealizes Galbulidae. sent4: if the fact that the swindler is insectivorous is true then the fact that the edmontosaurus does guard Bornean but it is not insectivorous is wrong. sent5: if that the glowworm idealizes Galbulidae but it is not a adsorbate is wrong it is not insectivorous. sent6: the regurgitation is not a kind of a dragonet but it is a adsorbate if the glowworm is a kind of a adsorbate. sent7: that the edmontosaurus guards Bornean and it is insectivorous is false. sent8: if the regurgitation is not a dragonet but a adsorbate that the swindler is insectivorous is right.
sent3 -> int1: the glowworm is a kind of a adsorbate.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the regurgitation is both not a dragonet and a adsorbate.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the swindler is insectivorous.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the edmontosaurus guards Bornean but it is not insectivorous is false.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the edmontosaurus does not poke.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is not a poke. ; $context$ = sent1: the edmontosaurus is not a poke if the fact that it does guard Bornean and is not insectivorous is not true. sent2: the fact that the glowworm idealizes Galbulidae is correct. sent3: the glowworm is a adsorbate and idealizes Galbulidae. sent4: if the fact that the swindler is insectivorous is true then the fact that the edmontosaurus does guard Bornean but it is not insectivorous is wrong. sent5: if that the glowworm idealizes Galbulidae but it is not a adsorbate is wrong it is not insectivorous. sent6: the regurgitation is not a kind of a dragonet but it is a adsorbate if the glowworm is a kind of a adsorbate. sent7: that the edmontosaurus guards Bornean and it is insectivorous is false. sent8: if the regurgitation is not a dragonet but a adsorbate that the swindler is insectivorous is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the glowworm is a kind of a adsorbate.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the regurgitation is both not a dragonet and a adsorbate.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the swindler is insectivorous.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the edmontosaurus guards Bornean but it is not insectivorous is false.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the edmontosaurus does not poke.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__