that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a sensuousness then it is not centrosomic and does stigmatize entry is right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a sensuousness then it does stigmatize entry. sent2: the earthtongue is not a squeak but it does stigmatize entry if it is not phreatic. sent3: something that is not a kind of a inkwell does not stigmatize overhead and is phreatic. sent4: if the earthtongue is not a kind of a sensuousness it is not centrosomic. sent5: something is not centrosomic and stigmatizes entry if it is not a sensuousness. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not papery it is not an arbitration but anticyclonic.
sent5 -> int1: if the earthtongue is not a sensuousness then it is a kind of non-centrosomic thing that stigmatizes entry.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a inkwell then it does not stigmatize overhead and is phreatic.
sent3 -> int2: the entry does not stigmatize overhead but it is phreatic if it is not a inkwell.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a sensuousness then it is not centrosomic and does stigmatize entry is right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a sensuousness then it does stigmatize entry. sent2: the earthtongue is not a squeak but it does stigmatize entry if it is not phreatic. sent3: something that is not a kind of a inkwell does not stigmatize overhead and is phreatic. sent4: if the earthtongue is not a kind of a sensuousness it is not centrosomic. sent5: something is not centrosomic and stigmatizes entry if it is not a sensuousness. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not papery it is not an arbitration but anticyclonic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the earthtongue is not a sensuousness then it is a kind of non-centrosomic thing that stigmatizes entry.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__