the wollastonite is not a kind of a Qin but it does rubric.
sent1: if the acarine is a Qin then that the wollastonite is a Qin and is a rubric does not hold. sent2: the acarine is crude if that the fishery is not crude and is cautious is not true. sent3: that the acarine is crude and it is a Qin is false if the fact that the fishery is not vegetative is not false. sent4: if the fact that the swanflower is a teju is right the fact that the turnaround is a teju hold. sent5: that the fishery is non-crude thing that is cautious is false if the Delilah is a teju. sent6: that the acarine is lengthwise and it is a testudo is not right. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a rubric and/or it is non-canonic the fishery is not vegetative. sent8: that the wollastonite is a Qin and it is a kind of a rubric is incorrect. sent9: the sluicegate is not a Qin if there exists something such that the fact that it is crude and it is a Qin is not right. sent10: the Delilah is a teju if the turnaround is a kind of a teju. sent11: if the Argonaut does not snowball Sydenham the swanflower is a teju. sent12: either something is cautious or it is not canonic or both if it is a kind of a teju. sent13: the fact that something is canonic thing that is not vegetative does not hold if it is crude. sent14: something is not canonic if either it is cautious or it is not canonic or both. sent15: if the acarine is a kind of a Qin then the fact that the wollastonite is not a Qin but it is a rubric is not correct. sent16: the fishery is crude if the acarine is lengthwise. sent17: the wollastonite is a kind of a teju and it snowballs Sydenham. sent18: if the acarine is not vegetative it is a Qin. sent19: the fishery is a kind of a Qin. sent20: if the acarine is vegetative then that it is non-lengthwise thing that is a testudo is incorrect. sent21: the fishery is crude if that the acarine is not lengthwise and is a testudo is not right. sent22: a vegetative thing is not a Qin but a rubric. sent23: the fishery is not crude. sent24: if the acarine is vegetative that it is lengthwise and it is a testudo is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acarine is vegetative.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the acarine is not lengthwise but it is a testudo does not hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the fishery is crude.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the acarine is not vegetative.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the acarine is a Qin.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the sluicegate is not a kind of a Qin.
sent14 -> int6: if the wollastonite either is cautious or is not canonic or both then it is not canonic.; sent12 -> int7: that the wollastonite is cautious or it is not canonic or both if the wollastonite is a kind of a teju is correct.; sent17 -> int8: the fact that the wollastonite is a teju is true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the wollastonite is cautious or not canonic or both.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the wollastonite is not canonic.; int10 -> int11: the wollastonite is not a rubric and/or it is not canonic.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is not a kind of a rubric and/or is not canonic.; int12 & sent7 -> int13: the fact that the fishery is not vegetative is not incorrect.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the acarine is crude and it is a Qin is not true.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it is crude and a Qin does not hold.; int15 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the wollastonite is not a kind of a Qin but it does rubric. ; $context$ = sent1: if the acarine is a Qin then that the wollastonite is a Qin and is a rubric does not hold. sent2: the acarine is crude if that the fishery is not crude and is cautious is not true. sent3: that the acarine is crude and it is a Qin is false if the fact that the fishery is not vegetative is not false. sent4: if the fact that the swanflower is a teju is right the fact that the turnaround is a teju hold. sent5: that the fishery is non-crude thing that is cautious is false if the Delilah is a teju. sent6: that the acarine is lengthwise and it is a testudo is not right. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a rubric and/or it is non-canonic the fishery is not vegetative. sent8: that the wollastonite is a Qin and it is a kind of a rubric is incorrect. sent9: the sluicegate is not a Qin if there exists something such that the fact that it is crude and it is a Qin is not right. sent10: the Delilah is a teju if the turnaround is a kind of a teju. sent11: if the Argonaut does not snowball Sydenham the swanflower is a teju. sent12: either something is cautious or it is not canonic or both if it is a kind of a teju. sent13: the fact that something is canonic thing that is not vegetative does not hold if it is crude. sent14: something is not canonic if either it is cautious or it is not canonic or both. sent15: if the acarine is a kind of a Qin then the fact that the wollastonite is not a Qin but it is a rubric is not correct. sent16: the fishery is crude if the acarine is lengthwise. sent17: the wollastonite is a kind of a teju and it snowballs Sydenham. sent18: if the acarine is not vegetative it is a Qin. sent19: the fishery is a kind of a Qin. sent20: if the acarine is vegetative then that it is non-lengthwise thing that is a testudo is incorrect. sent21: the fishery is crude if that the acarine is not lengthwise and is a testudo is not right. sent22: a vegetative thing is not a Qin but a rubric. sent23: the fishery is not crude. sent24: if the acarine is vegetative that it is lengthwise and it is a testudo is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acarine is vegetative.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: that the acarine is not lengthwise but it is a testudo does not hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the fishery is crude.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the acarine is not vegetative.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the acarine is a Qin.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__