there exists something such that if it is not bibless the fact that it is resistive and it is not gymnospermous is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does vex lumpsucker then that it pans wrangler and does not decorate cardiograph does not hold. sent2: if something is not a lamination that it falsifies and is bacteremic does not hold. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of a tureen that does not pan macro is not correct if it is vesicular. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not low-resolution then it is a kind of a tapa and it is not sessile. sent5: the progestin is gymnospermous but it is not a Palestinian if it is not a scorcher. sent6: the fact that something does translate and is not a lamination is not right if it is not a kind of an armor. sent7: if something is a kind of a laterality then the fact that it is a kind of a Reich and is not a Ishtar is incorrect. sent8: that something dreams laptop but it is not ectodermal is not correct if it is not a kind of a Palestinian. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not decorate napkin is right then it translates and it is not a kind of a Perodicticus. sent10: if that something is a finish is not incorrect that it does pan Ummah and it is not a Prionotus does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a Perodicticus then the fact that it is a shinpad and is non-homologous is false. sent12: there is something such that if it does not decorate progestin the fact that it is Estonian and it is not clonic is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a Shingon then the fact that it pans sonnet and it is an ensemble is not correct. sent14: the fact that the progestin does decorate napkin but it does not vex chalcopyrite is not true if it does underwrite. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not vex rhabdovirus it does decorate Foucault and it does not stickle. sent16: if something is not a luxuriation then that it is a laterality and it does vex bootmaker does not hold. sent17: the fact that something does spirit but it does not decorate prey is not true if it is not butyric. sent18: the fact that the dome inclines and is not bibless is false if it is non-interoceptive. sent19: something pans wrangler and does not pan Ummah if it is not a kind of a pasteurization.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not bibless the fact that it is resistive and it is not gymnospermous is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does vex lumpsucker then that it pans wrangler and does not decorate cardiograph does not hold. sent2: if something is not a lamination that it falsifies and is bacteremic does not hold. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of a tureen that does not pan macro is not correct if it is vesicular. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not low-resolution then it is a kind of a tapa and it is not sessile. sent5: the progestin is gymnospermous but it is not a Palestinian if it is not a scorcher. sent6: the fact that something does translate and is not a lamination is not right if it is not a kind of an armor. sent7: if something is a kind of a laterality then the fact that it is a kind of a Reich and is not a Ishtar is incorrect. sent8: that something dreams laptop but it is not ectodermal is not correct if it is not a kind of a Palestinian. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not decorate napkin is right then it translates and it is not a kind of a Perodicticus. sent10: if that something is a finish is not incorrect that it does pan Ummah and it is not a Prionotus does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a Perodicticus then the fact that it is a shinpad and is non-homologous is false. sent12: there is something such that if it does not decorate progestin the fact that it is Estonian and it is not clonic is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a Shingon then the fact that it pans sonnet and it is an ensemble is not correct. sent14: the fact that the progestin does decorate napkin but it does not vex chalcopyrite is not true if it does underwrite. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not vex rhabdovirus it does decorate Foucault and it does not stickle. sent16: if something is not a luxuriation then that it is a laterality and it does vex bootmaker does not hold. sent17: the fact that something does spirit but it does not decorate prey is not true if it is not butyric. sent18: the fact that the dome inclines and is not bibless is false if it is non-interoceptive. sent19: something pans wrangler and does not pan Ummah if it is not a kind of a pasteurization. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__