that there exists something such that if it is not sclerotic then it is a kind of toll-free thing that is a piper is wrong.
sent1: if the phonetician is not a Ephesian then the fact that it is a kind of a piper and it is not non-photoelectric is right. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not undercut gratitude it confuses and it is psychosexual. sent3: if the phonetician is sclerotic it is toll-free and it is a kind of a piper. sent4: there is something such that if it is not sclerotic the fact that it is toll-free is correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a ketohexose then it is a kind of unappealable a jird. sent6: there is something such that if it does not corrupt it is a pun and it deforms. sent7: there exists something such that if it is sclerotic then it is both toll-free and a piper. sent8: there is something such that if it is not sclerotic it is a piper. sent9: something does undercut Beatitude and it is a residence if it does not grate handed. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not legal then it is a lockout that does undercut Noether. sent11: there is something such that if it does not connive then it is edible thing that is a kind of a laughter. sent12: if the phonetician is not sclerotic it is reductionist and it is not non-archdiocesan. sent13: if the fact that the phonetician is not sclerotic is not false then it is leaky and a collective. sent14: if something is not a chariot then it founders and it is cytoplasmic. sent15: the phonetician is toll-free and a piper if it is not sclerotic. sent16: something is a monorail and it does imbricate if it is not a kind of a jird. sent17: if the phonetician is not sclerotic it is a kind of a piper.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
the phonetician is a founder and it is cytoplasmic if it does not chariot.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not sclerotic then it is a kind of toll-free thing that is a piper is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the phonetician is not a Ephesian then the fact that it is a kind of a piper and it is not non-photoelectric is right. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not undercut gratitude it confuses and it is psychosexual. sent3: if the phonetician is sclerotic it is toll-free and it is a kind of a piper. sent4: there is something such that if it is not sclerotic the fact that it is toll-free is correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a ketohexose then it is a kind of unappealable a jird. sent6: there is something such that if it does not corrupt it is a pun and it deforms. sent7: there exists something such that if it is sclerotic then it is both toll-free and a piper. sent8: there is something such that if it is not sclerotic it is a piper. sent9: something does undercut Beatitude and it is a residence if it does not grate handed. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not legal then it is a lockout that does undercut Noether. sent11: there is something such that if it does not connive then it is edible thing that is a kind of a laughter. sent12: if the phonetician is not sclerotic it is reductionist and it is not non-archdiocesan. sent13: if the fact that the phonetician is not sclerotic is not false then it is leaky and a collective. sent14: if something is not a chariot then it founders and it is cytoplasmic. sent15: the phonetician is toll-free and a piper if it is not sclerotic. sent16: something is a monorail and it does imbricate if it is not a kind of a jird. sent17: if the phonetician is not sclerotic it is a kind of a piper. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__