the fact that the Wren does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee and it is not nonadsorbent is not correct.
sent1: something is not a root and it does not adapt. sent2: if something is a recruiting-sergeant it is not adactylous. sent3: the Wren nests Scrabble and it is a recruiting-sergeant. sent4: the Wren is not adactylous. sent5: the Wren does nest Scrabble. sent6: the retardant is a kind of rationalist a Rostov. sent7: there exists something such that it is a permeation. sent8: the blink is not a peg and is not surficial. sent9: there is something such that it is not a permeation. sent10: the Wren is corymbose and is a Scolopax. sent11: the Wren is not adactylous if it is a kind of a recruiting-sergeant. sent12: a recruiting-sergeant is not adactylous and does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee. sent13: the Wren is not nonadsorbent if there is something such that it is not a kind of a permeation. sent14: the Wren is not a Shiite if there is something such that it is not a recruiting-sergeant. sent15: something is not nonadsorbent and not a recruiting-sergeant if it is adactylous.
sent12 -> int1: if that the Wren is a recruiting-sergeant hold it is non-adactylous and it does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee.; sent3 -> int2: the Wren is a kind of a recruiting-sergeant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Wren is not adactylous and it does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee.; int3 -> int4: the Wren does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee.; sent9 & sent13 -> int5: the Wren is not nonadsorbent.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Wren does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee and is adsorbent does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Wren does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee and it is not nonadsorbent is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a root and it does not adapt. sent2: if something is a recruiting-sergeant it is not adactylous. sent3: the Wren nests Scrabble and it is a recruiting-sergeant. sent4: the Wren is not adactylous. sent5: the Wren does nest Scrabble. sent6: the retardant is a kind of rationalist a Rostov. sent7: there exists something such that it is a permeation. sent8: the blink is not a peg and is not surficial. sent9: there is something such that it is not a permeation. sent10: the Wren is corymbose and is a Scolopax. sent11: the Wren is not adactylous if it is a kind of a recruiting-sergeant. sent12: a recruiting-sergeant is not adactylous and does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee. sent13: the Wren is not nonadsorbent if there is something such that it is not a kind of a permeation. sent14: the Wren is not a Shiite if there is something such that it is not a recruiting-sergeant. sent15: something is not nonadsorbent and not a recruiting-sergeant if it is adactylous. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if that the Wren is a recruiting-sergeant hold it is non-adactylous and it does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee.; sent3 -> int2: the Wren is a kind of a recruiting-sergeant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Wren is not adactylous and it does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee.; int3 -> int4: the Wren does not neglect cuckoo-bumblebee.; sent9 & sent13 -> int5: the Wren is not nonadsorbent.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__