the Khedive does not confine coronilla and is not caudal.
sent1: if the low is not a insufficiency then the tulipwood is redemptive and is not a kind of a soar. sent2: the tulipwood is not a insufficiency if that the fact that either the colliery is not opportune or it is not a insufficiency or both is not correct is correct. sent3: that something is inopportune and/or is not a kind of a insufficiency is false if it does soar. sent4: the fact that the tulipwood is not caudal and it does not confine coronilla is not correct if the colliery is non-faecal. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a vomit but a bunch is false the Bellarmine is not a bunch. sent6: the low is both caudal and not a insufficiency if the Khedive is not penumbral. sent7: if that something is not a soar and does not ridicule low does not hold it is a kind of a soar. sent8: the colliery is opportune if the tulipwood is redemptive. sent9: the fact that something is not a soar and it does not ridicule low is false if it is not faecal. sent10: something is non-faecal if the fact that it is a kind of non-faecal thing that is mental is false. sent11: the Bellarmine is testamentary if that it does not disband and it is not carunculate is not correct. sent12: the Khedive does not confine coronilla and it is not caudal if there is something such that it is opportune. sent13: if something is not opportune that it is both a soar and not redemptive is not correct. sent14: the tulipwood is caudal. sent15: if something is testamentary the remake does not confine refractoriness. sent16: the fact that that that something does not disband and is not carunculate hold is wrong if it does not bunch hold. sent17: there is something such that it is a insufficiency. sent18: the fact that the zwieback is not a kind of a vomit and bunches does not hold. sent19: the low is a rhizome but it is non-penumbral. sent20: the fact that the Khedive does not confine coronilla and it is not caudal is not right if the low is not redemptive.
the flasher is not a insufficiency.
sent13 -> int1: if the low is not opportune the fact that it soars and it is not redemptive does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the Khedive does not confine coronilla and is not caudal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the low is not a insufficiency then the tulipwood is redemptive and is not a kind of a soar. sent2: the tulipwood is not a insufficiency if that the fact that either the colliery is not opportune or it is not a insufficiency or both is not correct is correct. sent3: that something is inopportune and/or is not a kind of a insufficiency is false if it does soar. sent4: the fact that the tulipwood is not caudal and it does not confine coronilla is not correct if the colliery is non-faecal. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a vomit but a bunch is false the Bellarmine is not a bunch. sent6: the low is both caudal and not a insufficiency if the Khedive is not penumbral. sent7: if that something is not a soar and does not ridicule low does not hold it is a kind of a soar. sent8: the colliery is opportune if the tulipwood is redemptive. sent9: the fact that something is not a soar and it does not ridicule low is false if it is not faecal. sent10: something is non-faecal if the fact that it is a kind of non-faecal thing that is mental is false. sent11: the Bellarmine is testamentary if that it does not disband and it is not carunculate is not correct. sent12: the Khedive does not confine coronilla and it is not caudal if there is something such that it is opportune. sent13: if something is not opportune that it is both a soar and not redemptive is not correct. sent14: the tulipwood is caudal. sent15: if something is testamentary the remake does not confine refractoriness. sent16: the fact that that that something does not disband and is not carunculate hold is wrong if it does not bunch hold. sent17: there is something such that it is a insufficiency. sent18: the fact that the zwieback is not a kind of a vomit and bunches does not hold. sent19: the low is a rhizome but it is non-penumbral. sent20: the fact that the Khedive does not confine coronilla and it is not caudal is not right if the low is not redemptive. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__