that the electrum does not chance bundle and is a millionaire is incorrect.
sent1: if something spiels then the fact that it does not chance uxoriousness and straps taxer does not hold. sent2: that the flavonoid is not a spiel but it is a becket is not correct if there is something such that it is not a vomiter. sent3: if something is a spiel it does not chance bundle and is a millionaire. sent4: if the fact that something is volumetric and it is unpropitious is not correct then it is not reverent. sent5: the phylloquinone chances uxoriousness if the bundle is not a becket and it does not demineralize uninterestingness. sent6: if the bundle is a becket that the electrum does not chance bundle and is a millionaire does not hold. sent7: the headful is not a kind of a Polynesian. sent8: the fact that the PMS is Swiss or it is synaptic or both does not hold if the bundle is irreverent. sent9: if the fact that the phylloquinone does not spiel hold it does not chance uxoriousness. sent10: something spiels if it is a kind of a vomiter. sent11: the phylloquinone is not a spiel but a Swiss. sent12: the fact that the electrum does chance bundle and is a millionaire is not true. sent13: the PMS is a kind of a vomiter if the phylloquinone does not chance uxoriousness and does not demineralize uninterestingness. sent14: the fact that the bundle is volumetric and it is unpropitious does not hold if the headful is not a kind of a Polynesian. sent15: that if something is a becket then it is a kind of a vomiter is correct. sent16: the fact that the bundle is a vomiter but it is not a millionaire does not hold. sent17: if the PMS is a vomiter then the bundle is a becket.
sent11 -> int1: the phylloquinone does not spiel.;
the electrum does not chance bundle and is a millionaire.
sent3 -> int2: the electrum does not chance bundle and is a millionaire if it spiels.; sent10 -> int3: the electrum is a spiel if it is a kind of a vomiter.; sent15 -> int4: the electrum is a vomiter if it is a becket.; sent4 -> int5: if the fact that the bundle is not non-volumetric but unpropitious is not right it is not reverent.; sent14 & sent7 -> int6: that the bundle is volumetric and it is unpropitious is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bundle is not reverent.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the PMS is Swiss and/or synaptic is not right.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that the fact that it is Swiss and/or it is synaptic is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the electrum does not chance bundle and is a millionaire is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something spiels then the fact that it does not chance uxoriousness and straps taxer does not hold. sent2: that the flavonoid is not a spiel but it is a becket is not correct if there is something such that it is not a vomiter. sent3: if something is a spiel it does not chance bundle and is a millionaire. sent4: if the fact that something is volumetric and it is unpropitious is not correct then it is not reverent. sent5: the phylloquinone chances uxoriousness if the bundle is not a becket and it does not demineralize uninterestingness. sent6: if the bundle is a becket that the electrum does not chance bundle and is a millionaire does not hold. sent7: the headful is not a kind of a Polynesian. sent8: the fact that the PMS is Swiss or it is synaptic or both does not hold if the bundle is irreverent. sent9: if the fact that the phylloquinone does not spiel hold it does not chance uxoriousness. sent10: something spiels if it is a kind of a vomiter. sent11: the phylloquinone is not a spiel but a Swiss. sent12: the fact that the electrum does chance bundle and is a millionaire is not true. sent13: the PMS is a kind of a vomiter if the phylloquinone does not chance uxoriousness and does not demineralize uninterestingness. sent14: the fact that the bundle is volumetric and it is unpropitious does not hold if the headful is not a kind of a Polynesian. sent15: that if something is a becket then it is a kind of a vomiter is correct. sent16: the fact that the bundle is a vomiter but it is not a millionaire does not hold. sent17: if the PMS is a vomiter then the bundle is a becket. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the phylloquinone does not spiel.; __UNKNOWN__