the smirker is a kind of a carnival but it does not demagnetize Cenozoic.
sent1: if the reserve is a kind of a cakewalk then the thunderbolt is a central. sent2: there is something such that that it is a central or it does cox or both is not true. sent3: the smirker is a quixotism if the loom does not demagnetize Cenozoic. sent4: if something is not a quixotism the fact that it is phosphorous thing that does not misrepresent is not correct. sent5: the fact that the loom demagnetizes Cenozoic is true. sent6: if the stranger is non-phosphorous then the loom wails rowing. sent7: the reserve cakewalks. sent8: if the thunderbolt is central then the staphylococcus does wail rowing. sent9: the fact that the stranger misrepresents but it does not cox is not right. sent10: if that the loom is phosphorous and does not misrepresent is false then the dictator does not demagnetize Cenozoic. sent11: the thunderbolt does not wail rowing if that the fact that the staphylococcus demagnetizes Cenozoic but it is not a kind of a central hold does not hold. sent12: if the stranger cakewalks then the reserve wails rowing. sent13: if the dictator does not demagnetize Cenozoic then the smirker is a carnival that does not demagnetize Cenozoic. sent14: the staphylococcus does wail rowing and does not demagnetize Cenozoic if the dictator does not demagnetize Cenozoic. sent15: the neopallium is bracteate but it is not a kind of a backing. sent16: the loom is not a quixotism if there exists something such that that it does not wail rowing and/or it coxes does not hold. sent17: if the staphylococcus wails rowing then the fact that the fact that the stranger does not wails rowing and/or it does cox does not hold is not false. sent18: the fact that the conductor is phosphorous hold.
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the thunderbolt is a central.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the staphylococcus wails rowing.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the stranger does not wail rowing and/or it does cox is not right.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it either does not wail rowing or coxes or both is incorrect.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the loom is not a quixotism.; sent4 -> int6: if the loom is not a kind of a quixotism then that it is not non-phosphorous and it does not misrepresent does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the loom is phosphorous but it does not misrepresent is not true.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the dictator does not demagnetize Cenozoic is correct.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the smirker is a kind of a carnival but it does not demagnetize Cenozoic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the reserve is a kind of a cakewalk then the thunderbolt is a central. sent2: there is something such that that it is a central or it does cox or both is not true. sent3: the smirker is a quixotism if the loom does not demagnetize Cenozoic. sent4: if something is not a quixotism the fact that it is phosphorous thing that does not misrepresent is not correct. sent5: the fact that the loom demagnetizes Cenozoic is true. sent6: if the stranger is non-phosphorous then the loom wails rowing. sent7: the reserve cakewalks. sent8: if the thunderbolt is central then the staphylococcus does wail rowing. sent9: the fact that the stranger misrepresents but it does not cox is not right. sent10: if that the loom is phosphorous and does not misrepresent is false then the dictator does not demagnetize Cenozoic. sent11: the thunderbolt does not wail rowing if that the fact that the staphylococcus demagnetizes Cenozoic but it is not a kind of a central hold does not hold. sent12: if the stranger cakewalks then the reserve wails rowing. sent13: if the dictator does not demagnetize Cenozoic then the smirker is a carnival that does not demagnetize Cenozoic. sent14: the staphylococcus does wail rowing and does not demagnetize Cenozoic if the dictator does not demagnetize Cenozoic. sent15: the neopallium is bracteate but it is not a kind of a backing. sent16: the loom is not a quixotism if there exists something such that that it does not wail rowing and/or it coxes does not hold. sent17: if the staphylococcus wails rowing then the fact that the fact that the stranger does not wails rowing and/or it does cox does not hold is not false. sent18: the fact that the conductor is phosphorous hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the thunderbolt is a central.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the staphylococcus wails rowing.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the stranger does not wail rowing and/or it does cox is not right.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it either does not wail rowing or coxes or both is incorrect.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the loom is not a quixotism.; sent4 -> int6: if the loom is not a kind of a quixotism then that it is not non-phosphorous and it does not misrepresent does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the loom is phosphorous but it does not misrepresent is not true.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the dictator does not demagnetize Cenozoic is correct.; int8 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__