the Hero does not occur.
sent1: the fretting digestion does not occur if the investment does not occur. sent2: if not the fretting hydathode but the deprecation occurs then the ophthalmectomy occurs. sent3: if the waiving does not occur then the Hero does not occur. sent4: if the revolving occurs the infliction does not occur. sent5: the cormousness does not occur if that the u-turn does not occur is correct. sent6: either that the softness occurs or the underproduction or both prevents that the fretting road happens. sent7: the penetrating does not occur if either the contradistinguishing forearm or the ophthalmectomy or both occurs. sent8: not the fretting hydathode but the deprecation happens. sent9: if the fact that the nonfunctionalness does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that both the ophthalmectomy and the penetrating happens is wrong. sent10: if the penetrating does not occur then the non-nonfunctionalness and the spit occurs. sent11: that the waiving does not occur is triggered by that the spit happens and/or the gladness happens.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the ophthalmectomy occurs is correct.; int1 -> int2: the contradistinguishing forearm or the ophthalmectomy or both occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the penetrating does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the functioningness and the spitting happens is true.; int4 -> int5: the spit occurs.; int5 -> int6: the spitting occurs and/or the gladness occurs.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the waiving does not occur.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the Hero occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the Hero does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fretting digestion does not occur if the investment does not occur. sent2: if not the fretting hydathode but the deprecation occurs then the ophthalmectomy occurs. sent3: if the waiving does not occur then the Hero does not occur. sent4: if the revolving occurs the infliction does not occur. sent5: the cormousness does not occur if that the u-turn does not occur is correct. sent6: either that the softness occurs or the underproduction or both prevents that the fretting road happens. sent7: the penetrating does not occur if either the contradistinguishing forearm or the ophthalmectomy or both occurs. sent8: not the fretting hydathode but the deprecation happens. sent9: if the fact that the nonfunctionalness does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that both the ophthalmectomy and the penetrating happens is wrong. sent10: if the penetrating does not occur then the non-nonfunctionalness and the spit occurs. sent11: that the waiving does not occur is triggered by that the spit happens and/or the gladness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the ophthalmectomy occurs is correct.; int1 -> int2: the contradistinguishing forearm or the ophthalmectomy or both occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the penetrating does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the functioningness and the spitting happens is true.; int4 -> int5: the spit occurs.; int5 -> int6: the spitting occurs and/or the gladness occurs.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the waiving does not occur.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__