the fact that the sincereness occurs and the adjournment does not occur is not right.
sent1: both the starchiness and the knowableness happens. sent2: if the incontestableness does not occur the pricing Gazella does not occur. sent3: that both the mingling ploce and the non-gastroesophagealness happens is not correct. sent4: the subsonicness happens. sent5: the altricialness does not occur. sent6: that the pricing Gazella does not occur is caused by that the incontestableness does not occur and/or that the retardation does not occur. sent7: if the altricialness does not occur then both the pricing Gazella and the subsonicness happens. sent8: the winnowing does not occur. sent9: if the remuneration does not occur the fact that the sincereness occurs and the adjournment does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the incontestableness does not occur or the retardation does not occur or both is triggered by the remuneration. sent11: that that the sincereness happens and the adjournment occurs hold is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the remuneration happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the incontestableness does not occur and/or the retardation does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the pricing Gazella does not occur.; sent7 & sent5 -> int3: both the pricing Gazella and the subsonicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the pricing Gazella happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the remuneration does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sincereness occurs and the adjournment does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: both the starchiness and the knowableness happens. sent2: if the incontestableness does not occur the pricing Gazella does not occur. sent3: that both the mingling ploce and the non-gastroesophagealness happens is not correct. sent4: the subsonicness happens. sent5: the altricialness does not occur. sent6: that the pricing Gazella does not occur is caused by that the incontestableness does not occur and/or that the retardation does not occur. sent7: if the altricialness does not occur then both the pricing Gazella and the subsonicness happens. sent8: the winnowing does not occur. sent9: if the remuneration does not occur the fact that the sincereness occurs and the adjournment does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the incontestableness does not occur or the retardation does not occur or both is triggered by the remuneration. sent11: that that the sincereness happens and the adjournment occurs hold is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the remuneration happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the incontestableness does not occur and/or the retardation does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the pricing Gazella does not occur.; sent7 & sent5 -> int3: both the pricing Gazella and the subsonicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the pricing Gazella happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the remuneration does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__