that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a echinococcus then that it is endomorphic and it does not shoot AFP does not hold does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the veneer is endomorphic but it does not shoot AFP does not hold if it is not a kind of a echinococcus. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a echinococcus it is endomorphic and it does not shoot AFP. sent3: the fact that something rivals pastoral and does not drip is wrong if it is not agrobiologic. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a echinococcus then the fact that it is endomorphic and it shoots AFP is not right. sent5: that the veneer is endomorphic and it shoots AFP is not true if that it is not a echinococcus is not incorrect. sent6: if the veneer does not shoot AFP that it is hierarchical and it does not rival racketeering is not right. sent7: the fact that the inula is a kind of a Afroasiatic and is not a echinococcus is incorrect if it does not commutate gleaner. sent8: there is something such that if it is not corneal that it does commutate Punjab and is not a iproclozide does not hold. sent9: if the veneer is a kind of a echinococcus that it is endomorphic and it does not shoot AFP is not correct. sent10: that the veneer is endomorphic but it does not shoot AFP is correct if it is not a echinococcus. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a echinococcus the fact that it is endomorphic and it does not shoot AFP is not right.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that there is something such that if it is not agrobiologic then that it rivals pastoral and it is not a drip does not hold is not false.
sent3 -> int1: that the AFP does rival pastoral but it does not drip is not correct if it is not agrobiologic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a echinococcus then that it is endomorphic and it does not shoot AFP does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the veneer is endomorphic but it does not shoot AFP does not hold if it is not a kind of a echinococcus. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a echinococcus it is endomorphic and it does not shoot AFP. sent3: the fact that something rivals pastoral and does not drip is wrong if it is not agrobiologic. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a echinococcus then the fact that it is endomorphic and it shoots AFP is not right. sent5: that the veneer is endomorphic and it shoots AFP is not true if that it is not a echinococcus is not incorrect. sent6: if the veneer does not shoot AFP that it is hierarchical and it does not rival racketeering is not right. sent7: the fact that the inula is a kind of a Afroasiatic and is not a echinococcus is incorrect if it does not commutate gleaner. sent8: there is something such that if it is not corneal that it does commutate Punjab and is not a iproclozide does not hold. sent9: if the veneer is a kind of a echinococcus that it is endomorphic and it does not shoot AFP is not correct. sent10: that the veneer is endomorphic but it does not shoot AFP is correct if it is not a echinococcus. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a echinococcus the fact that it is endomorphic and it does not shoot AFP is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__