the pasta does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the disposition and the dispute occurs is false if the electrochemicalness does not occur. sent2: both the immunochemicalness and the lyric happens. sent3: the fact that the anti does not occur is right if the dispute does not occur. sent4: if the lyric happens the anti occurs. sent5: the pastaness does not occur if the fact that the electrochemicalness does not occur and the positive does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the electrochemicalness happens if that either the disposition does not occur or the positiveness does not occur or both does not hold. sent7: that the avocationalness occurs and the needlework happens is wrong if the invoking suited does not occur. sent8: if that the alchemicness occurs hold the hooking does not occur. sent9: that the anti does not occur hold if that the disposition and the dispute occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the non-electrochemicalness and the non-positiveness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the electrochemicalness does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the disposition and the dispute happens is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the anti does not occur.; sent2 -> int4: the lyric occurs.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the antiness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that both the non-electrochemicalness and the non-positiveness happens does not hold.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the pasta occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the pasta does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the disposition and the dispute occurs is false if the electrochemicalness does not occur. sent2: both the immunochemicalness and the lyric happens. sent3: the fact that the anti does not occur is right if the dispute does not occur. sent4: if the lyric happens the anti occurs. sent5: the pastaness does not occur if the fact that the electrochemicalness does not occur and the positive does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the electrochemicalness happens if that either the disposition does not occur or the positiveness does not occur or both does not hold. sent7: that the avocationalness occurs and the needlework happens is wrong if the invoking suited does not occur. sent8: if that the alchemicness occurs hold the hooking does not occur. sent9: that the anti does not occur hold if that the disposition and the dispute occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the non-electrochemicalness and the non-positiveness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the electrochemicalness does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the disposition and the dispute happens is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the anti does not occur.; sent2 -> int4: the lyric occurs.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the antiness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that both the non-electrochemicalness and the non-positiveness happens does not hold.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__