the stephanion is a Monnet and is a dumbbell.
sent1: if the underseller is not a Monnet but it is a kind of a quest it is not a re-introduction. sent2: if the glassware is not a kind of a rustication then that the darmstadtium is gymnospermous and does darken is wrong. sent3: the stephanion is a Monnet if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a Monnet and it is immiscible is true is false. sent4: the Muscovite is a concrete. sent5: the underseller is a re-introduction. sent6: if the wharfage is gymnospermous the glassware is not gymnospermous. sent7: if the darmstadtium does decrease cartilage the glassware does concrete. sent8: the darmstadtium is not a kind of a dumbbell if the glassware is not gymnospermous. sent9: the stephanion is gymnospermous if the darmstadtium is a kind of a dumbbell. sent10: there is something such that that it is not a Monnet and it is immiscible is false. sent11: if the underseller is a dumbbell then the stephanion is a re-introduction. sent12: the fact that something is not a kind of a Monnet if that it is gymnospermous and it does darken is false is right. sent13: the gadgeteer does darken if there is something such that that it is a rustication that does not decrease cartilage is not right. sent14: if the fact that something is not gymnospermous and it is not a kind of a rustication is incorrect it does decrease cartilage. sent15: if the underseller is a re-introduction it is not monophonic and it is not a kind of a quest. sent16: that the underseller is a kind of a dumbbell is true if that it does not quest and does not darken is false. sent17: the fact that the betaine is not gymnospermous but it decreases Tampico is not right. sent18: something does decrease practice if that it does not cream Hmong and does not decrease psalmist is not correct. sent19: if the underseller does not darken then that the darmstadtium is non-gymnospermous thing that is not a rustication is not right. sent20: if something is a nationalism then it enfeoffs wharfage. sent21: if the Muscovite does concrete the fact that it is a rustication that does not decrease cartilage does not hold. sent22: if the glassware does intend the stephanion is a dumbbell. sent23: something intends if it is not non-concrete.
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the underseller is not monophonic and is not a quest.; sent14 -> int2: the darmstadtium does decrease cartilage if that it is both not gymnospermous and not a rustication is wrong.; sent23 -> int3: the glassware intends if it is concrete.; sent10 & sent3 -> int4: the stephanion is a kind of a Monnet.;
that the stephanion is a Monnet and is a kind of a dumbbell is wrong.
sent21 & sent4 -> int5: that the Muscovite is a rustication and does not decrease cartilage is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is a rustication and it does not decrease cartilage does not hold.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the gadgeteer darkens.; int7 -> int8: something does darken.;
$hypothesis$ = the stephanion is a Monnet and is a dumbbell. ; $context$ = sent1: if the underseller is not a Monnet but it is a kind of a quest it is not a re-introduction. sent2: if the glassware is not a kind of a rustication then that the darmstadtium is gymnospermous and does darken is wrong. sent3: the stephanion is a Monnet if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a Monnet and it is immiscible is true is false. sent4: the Muscovite is a concrete. sent5: the underseller is a re-introduction. sent6: if the wharfage is gymnospermous the glassware is not gymnospermous. sent7: if the darmstadtium does decrease cartilage the glassware does concrete. sent8: the darmstadtium is not a kind of a dumbbell if the glassware is not gymnospermous. sent9: the stephanion is gymnospermous if the darmstadtium is a kind of a dumbbell. sent10: there is something such that that it is not a Monnet and it is immiscible is false. sent11: if the underseller is a dumbbell then the stephanion is a re-introduction. sent12: the fact that something is not a kind of a Monnet if that it is gymnospermous and it does darken is false is right. sent13: the gadgeteer does darken if there is something such that that it is a rustication that does not decrease cartilage is not right. sent14: if the fact that something is not gymnospermous and it is not a kind of a rustication is incorrect it does decrease cartilage. sent15: if the underseller is a re-introduction it is not monophonic and it is not a kind of a quest. sent16: that the underseller is a kind of a dumbbell is true if that it does not quest and does not darken is false. sent17: the fact that the betaine is not gymnospermous but it decreases Tampico is not right. sent18: something does decrease practice if that it does not cream Hmong and does not decrease psalmist is not correct. sent19: if the underseller does not darken then that the darmstadtium is non-gymnospermous thing that is not a rustication is not right. sent20: if something is a nationalism then it enfeoffs wharfage. sent21: if the Muscovite does concrete the fact that it is a rustication that does not decrease cartilage does not hold. sent22: if the glassware does intend the stephanion is a dumbbell. sent23: something intends if it is not non-concrete. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the underseller is not monophonic and is not a quest.; sent14 -> int2: the darmstadtium does decrease cartilage if that it is both not gymnospermous and not a rustication is wrong.; sent23 -> int3: the glassware intends if it is concrete.; sent10 & sent3 -> int4: the stephanion is a kind of a Monnet.; __UNKNOWN__