the cruse is a chemical and it does pant.
sent1: the mikado borders interreflection if the saddle is secretory but it is not tropical. sent2: the cruse does pant. sent3: if something is not inharmonious but it does border interreflection then it does not border decker. sent4: if the kerchief does border interreflection the trestle is not harmonious. sent5: the cruse is a chemical if the fact that it is a Menshevik or it is not a sharp or both does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the albite is not a kind of a sharp is not false that the cruse is not a kind of a Menshevik or it is not a sharp or both is not right. sent7: if the fact that the cruse either is not a Menshevik or is not a sharp or both is not correct then it is a kind of a chemical. sent8: the kerchief borders interreflection and does not border decker if the mikado borders interreflection. sent9: if something does not border decker the fact that it is chemical thing that does pant is not true. sent10: the saddle is secretory but not tropical.
sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the mikado borders interreflection is right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the kerchief does border interreflection and does not border decker.; int2 -> int3: the kerchief does border interreflection.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the trestle is inharmonious.; int4 -> int5: either the trestle is inharmonious or it is a Nymphicus or both.;
that the cruse is chemical and it is a pant is not correct.
sent9 -> int6: the fact that the cruse is a chemical and it pants is incorrect if it does not border decker.; sent3 -> int7: if the cruse is not inharmonious but it does border interreflection then the fact that it does not border decker is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the cruse is a chemical and it does pant. ; $context$ = sent1: the mikado borders interreflection if the saddle is secretory but it is not tropical. sent2: the cruse does pant. sent3: if something is not inharmonious but it does border interreflection then it does not border decker. sent4: if the kerchief does border interreflection the trestle is not harmonious. sent5: the cruse is a chemical if the fact that it is a Menshevik or it is not a sharp or both does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the albite is not a kind of a sharp is not false that the cruse is not a kind of a Menshevik or it is not a sharp or both is not right. sent7: if the fact that the cruse either is not a Menshevik or is not a sharp or both is not correct then it is a kind of a chemical. sent8: the kerchief borders interreflection and does not border decker if the mikado borders interreflection. sent9: if something does not border decker the fact that it is chemical thing that does pant is not true. sent10: the saddle is secretory but not tropical. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the mikado borders interreflection is right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the kerchief does border interreflection and does not border decker.; int2 -> int3: the kerchief does border interreflection.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the trestle is inharmonious.; int4 -> int5: either the trestle is inharmonious or it is a Nymphicus or both.; __UNKNOWN__