the caviar does not clout Riksmal.
sent1: if something is flowerless and/or it is not competent it is flowerless. sent2: if there are air-to-surface things the Copt is a kind of a vesicant. sent3: the caviar does clout gore if the ass is competent. sent4: the ass is a kind of a demyelination or it is clerical or both if there is something such that it is not a Pinot. sent5: if the fact that something is a vesicant and is not air-to-surface does not hold it does not clout Riksmal. sent6: if something is flowerless the fact that it is a vesicant and it is non-air-to-surface is not right. sent7: if the ass is a demyelination the Copt does clout gore. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Cynoglossidae and/or it is papery is incorrect. sent9: the Copt is a vesicant. sent10: the caviar clouts gore. sent11: the fact that the ass is competent is right if the Copt is flowerless. sent12: the float is not a Pinot if there exists something such that that it is not a Cynoglossidae and/or is papery does not hold. sent13: if the ass is competent then the caviar is not a demyelination and clouts gore. sent14: if something is not a demyelination and clouts gore the fact that it does clout Riksmal is correct. sent15: if there is something such that it is air-to-surface then the Copt is a vesicant and it is flowerless. sent16: there exists something such that it is air-to-surface.
sent16 & sent15 -> int1: the Copt is both a vesicant and flowerless.; int1 -> int2: the Copt is flowerless.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the ass is competent.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the caviar is not a kind of a demyelination and clouts gore.; sent14 -> int5: if the caviar is not a demyelination and clouts gore that it does clout Riksmal hold.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the caviar does not clout Riksmal.
sent5 -> int6: the caviar does not clout Riksmal if the fact that it is a vesicant and is non-air-to-surface is false.; sent6 -> int7: that the caviar is a vesicant and is not air-to-surface does not hold if that it is flowerless is not false.; sent1 -> int8: the caviar is flowerless if it is flowerless and/or not competent.; sent8 & sent12 -> int9: the float is not a kind of a Pinot.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a Pinot.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the ass either is a demyelination or is clerical or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the caviar does not clout Riksmal. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is flowerless and/or it is not competent it is flowerless. sent2: if there are air-to-surface things the Copt is a kind of a vesicant. sent3: the caviar does clout gore if the ass is competent. sent4: the ass is a kind of a demyelination or it is clerical or both if there is something such that it is not a Pinot. sent5: if the fact that something is a vesicant and is not air-to-surface does not hold it does not clout Riksmal. sent6: if something is flowerless the fact that it is a vesicant and it is non-air-to-surface is not right. sent7: if the ass is a demyelination the Copt does clout gore. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Cynoglossidae and/or it is papery is incorrect. sent9: the Copt is a vesicant. sent10: the caviar clouts gore. sent11: the fact that the ass is competent is right if the Copt is flowerless. sent12: the float is not a Pinot if there exists something such that that it is not a Cynoglossidae and/or is papery does not hold. sent13: if the ass is competent then the caviar is not a demyelination and clouts gore. sent14: if something is not a demyelination and clouts gore the fact that it does clout Riksmal is correct. sent15: if there is something such that it is air-to-surface then the Copt is a vesicant and it is flowerless. sent16: there exists something such that it is air-to-surface. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent15 -> int1: the Copt is both a vesicant and flowerless.; int1 -> int2: the Copt is flowerless.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the ass is competent.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the caviar is not a kind of a demyelination and clouts gore.; sent14 -> int5: if the caviar is not a demyelination and clouts gore that it does clout Riksmal hold.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__