that both the undressing flunitrazepan and the raree-show happens does not hold.
sent1: the owing does not occur. sent2: the lobeliaceousness happens. sent3: if that the backhanding happens and the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur is wrong the undressing flunitrazepan occurs. sent4: if the malingering dancing does not occur then that both the backhanding and the non-adenocarcinomatousness occurs is incorrect. sent5: the raree-show happens. sent6: the bopping steerage does not occur if the fact that the undressing Appleton does not occur and the owing does not occur is incorrect. sent7: that the bopping steerage does not occur results in that the malingering dancing does not occur. sent8: the undressing Appleton occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undressing Appleton does not occur and the owing does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the undressing Appleton does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the undressing Appleton does not occur and the owing does not occur is wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the bopping steerage does not occur is not false.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the malingering dancing does not occur is right.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that both the backhanded and the non-adenocarcinomatousness happens does not hold.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the undressing flunitrazepan happens.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the undressing flunitrazepan and the raree-show occurs is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the undressing flunitrazepan and the raree-show happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the owing does not occur. sent2: the lobeliaceousness happens. sent3: if that the backhanding happens and the adenocarcinomatousness does not occur is wrong the undressing flunitrazepan occurs. sent4: if the malingering dancing does not occur then that both the backhanding and the non-adenocarcinomatousness occurs is incorrect. sent5: the raree-show happens. sent6: the bopping steerage does not occur if the fact that the undressing Appleton does not occur and the owing does not occur is incorrect. sent7: that the bopping steerage does not occur results in that the malingering dancing does not occur. sent8: the undressing Appleton occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the undressing Appleton does not occur and the owing does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the undressing Appleton does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the undressing Appleton does not occur and the owing does not occur is wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the bopping steerage does not occur is not false.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the malingering dancing does not occur is right.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that both the backhanded and the non-adenocarcinomatousness happens does not hold.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the undressing flunitrazepan happens.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__