the nanny is a repressor.
sent1: the fact that that the copy is a repressor but it is not a indirectness is not incorrect is wrong. sent2: if that the copy is a repressor but it is not a kind of a indirectness is wrong then the stockroom is not a repressor. sent3: the fact that the fact that the pasha is a bedrest but it is not a Tyne does not hold if that something is prandial is not wrong hold. sent4: if that something is a bedrest but it is not a kind of a Tyne is incorrect then it is declarative. sent5: if something is not chaffy it is residential and is a repressor. sent6: something is not residential if it is both not enteric and not a repressor. sent7: if that the nanny is not a bedrest but declarative is not correct then the pasha is not a bedrest. sent8: something is prandial. sent9: if there is something such that it does not configure illuminance and it is declarative the nanny is not chaffy. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not prandial the troposphere is not a man-child. sent11: if the pasha is not a bedrest that it is not prandial is not incorrect. sent12: the pasha does not configure illuminance if the endocrine is a man-child. sent13: the stockroom is non-enteric. sent14: if something is not residential the fact that the endocrine is chaffy and/or does configure illuminance does not hold. sent15: if that something is not non-chaffy and/or it does configure illuminance is incorrect then it is not a Tyne.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the pasha is a bedrest but it is not a Tyne is not true.; sent4 -> int2: the pasha is declarative if the fact that it is a bedrest and it is not a kind of a Tyne is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pasha is declarative.; sent5 -> int4: if the nanny is not chaffy then it is a kind of residential a repressor.;
the troposphere is not a kind of a man-child.
sent15 -> int5: if the fact that either the endocrine is chaffy or it does configure illuminance or both is not true it is not a kind of a Tyne.; sent6 -> int6: if the stockroom is non-enteric thing that is not a repressor it is not residential.; sent2 & sent1 -> int7: the stockroom is not a repressor.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the stockroom is not enteric and not a repressor.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the stockroom is not residential is correct.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not residential.; int10 & sent14 -> int11: the fact that the endocrine is chaffy or configures illuminance or both is not correct.; int5 & int11 -> int12: that the endocrine is not a Tyne is not incorrect.; int12 -> int13: something is not a kind of a Tyne.;
$hypothesis$ = the nanny is a repressor. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the copy is a repressor but it is not a indirectness is not incorrect is wrong. sent2: if that the copy is a repressor but it is not a kind of a indirectness is wrong then the stockroom is not a repressor. sent3: the fact that the fact that the pasha is a bedrest but it is not a Tyne does not hold if that something is prandial is not wrong hold. sent4: if that something is a bedrest but it is not a kind of a Tyne is incorrect then it is declarative. sent5: if something is not chaffy it is residential and is a repressor. sent6: something is not residential if it is both not enteric and not a repressor. sent7: if that the nanny is not a bedrest but declarative is not correct then the pasha is not a bedrest. sent8: something is prandial. sent9: if there is something such that it does not configure illuminance and it is declarative the nanny is not chaffy. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not prandial the troposphere is not a man-child. sent11: if the pasha is not a bedrest that it is not prandial is not incorrect. sent12: the pasha does not configure illuminance if the endocrine is a man-child. sent13: the stockroom is non-enteric. sent14: if something is not residential the fact that the endocrine is chaffy and/or does configure illuminance does not hold. sent15: if that something is not non-chaffy and/or it does configure illuminance is incorrect then it is not a Tyne. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the pasha is a bedrest but it is not a Tyne is not true.; sent4 -> int2: the pasha is declarative if the fact that it is a bedrest and it is not a kind of a Tyne is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pasha is declarative.; sent5 -> int4: if the nanny is not chaffy then it is a kind of residential a repressor.; __UNKNOWN__