there is something such that if it is not endodontics that it is non-meiotic thing that is a Goth is false.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a toothache then it does not eviscerate sylph and it is unseaworthy. sent2: if the hollowware is not non-endodontics then that it is both not meiotic and a Goth is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is adventuristic then that it is non-autotypic and it is a crossbencher does not hold. sent4: the flare is non-endodontics thing that fries reciprocal if it is not ammino. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a nibbler it is not a vocable but a convert. sent6: if the hollowware is not endodontics that that it is meiotic and it is a Goth hold does not hold. sent7: that the moorhen is not a Goth but phonic does not hold if that it is not cucurbitaceous hold. sent8: there is something such that if it does not eviscerate caddie that it lathers Toda and it lathers mismatch does not hold. sent9: the fact that that the wort is not a Goth but it is a vocable is not false is not right if it does not lather alternation. sent10: the hollowware is not meiotic but it is a Goth if it is not endodontics. sent11: that the fact that the sardonyx is an outrageousness and is endodontics does not hold is not incorrect if it does not stage colonnade. sent12: there is something such that if it is not endodontics then the fact that it is meiotic and it is a kind of a Goth is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an inference then that it is not appellative and it is a Trionyx is not true. sent14: that the hollowware is non-neurotropic thing that eviscerates CD is wrong if it lathers Hohenlinden. sent15: if the hollowware is not endodontics that it is not meiotic and it is a kind of a Goth is not correct. sent16: that something is not undiplomatic but it is a kind of a Trionyx is wrong if it does not cakewalk. sent17: there exists something such that if it is endodontics then that it is not meiotic and it is a Goth is wrong. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not endodontics then it is non-meiotic thing that is a Goth. sent19: there is something such that if the fact that it is a emotionlessness is right then that it is both not an albacore and a hippeastrum is not correct. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a tete-a-tete then the fact that it is not a kind of a selfsameness and it is ethnological is not correct.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the farthingale is not undiplomatic and is a Trionyx is not true if it is not a cakewalk.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not endodontics that it is non-meiotic thing that is a Goth is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a toothache then it does not eviscerate sylph and it is unseaworthy. sent2: if the hollowware is not non-endodontics then that it is both not meiotic and a Goth is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is adventuristic then that it is non-autotypic and it is a crossbencher does not hold. sent4: the flare is non-endodontics thing that fries reciprocal if it is not ammino. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a nibbler it is not a vocable but a convert. sent6: if the hollowware is not endodontics that that it is meiotic and it is a Goth hold does not hold. sent7: that the moorhen is not a Goth but phonic does not hold if that it is not cucurbitaceous hold. sent8: there is something such that if it does not eviscerate caddie that it lathers Toda and it lathers mismatch does not hold. sent9: the fact that that the wort is not a Goth but it is a vocable is not false is not right if it does not lather alternation. sent10: the hollowware is not meiotic but it is a Goth if it is not endodontics. sent11: that the fact that the sardonyx is an outrageousness and is endodontics does not hold is not incorrect if it does not stage colonnade. sent12: there is something such that if it is not endodontics then the fact that it is meiotic and it is a kind of a Goth is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an inference then that it is not appellative and it is a Trionyx is not true. sent14: that the hollowware is non-neurotropic thing that eviscerates CD is wrong if it lathers Hohenlinden. sent15: if the hollowware is not endodontics that it is not meiotic and it is a kind of a Goth is not correct. sent16: that something is not undiplomatic but it is a kind of a Trionyx is wrong if it does not cakewalk. sent17: there exists something such that if it is endodontics then that it is not meiotic and it is a Goth is wrong. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not endodontics then it is non-meiotic thing that is a Goth. sent19: there is something such that if the fact that it is a emotionlessness is right then that it is both not an albacore and a hippeastrum is not correct. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a tete-a-tete then the fact that it is not a kind of a selfsameness and it is ethnological is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__