the Tongan is not pneumatics.
sent1: the fact that that the Tongan is a kind of non-objective thing that is not a globalization is not true is not wrong if the barmaid is not a globalization. sent2: the fact that the Tongan is a kind of the agrology if that the Tongan is non-objective and it is not a globalization is not right hold. sent3: the Tongan is not a palmature. sent4: the Tongan is not a welcher if it is a agrology and it is not a kind of a palmature. sent5: if the misleader does not cozen then that the carbohydrate is a diarchy and it is a paraprofessional is wrong. sent6: if the Tongan is not a welcher it is not pneumatics. sent7: the barmaid is not a kind of a globalization if that the carbohydrate is a diarchy and is a kind of a paraprofessional does not hold. sent8: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of invulnerable thing that is not epiphytic.
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the misleader is invulnerable and non-epiphytic is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Tongan is not pneumatics. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the Tongan is a kind of non-objective thing that is not a globalization is not true is not wrong if the barmaid is not a globalization. sent2: the fact that the Tongan is a kind of the agrology if that the Tongan is non-objective and it is not a globalization is not right hold. sent3: the Tongan is not a palmature. sent4: the Tongan is not a welcher if it is a agrology and it is not a kind of a palmature. sent5: if the misleader does not cozen then that the carbohydrate is a diarchy and it is a paraprofessional is wrong. sent6: if the Tongan is not a welcher it is not pneumatics. sent7: the barmaid is not a kind of a globalization if that the carbohydrate is a diarchy and is a kind of a paraprofessional does not hold. sent8: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of invulnerable thing that is not epiphytic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the misleader is invulnerable and non-epiphytic is false.; __UNKNOWN__