the sharksucker quietens clawback but it is not parasitic if the caracolito is not Wiccan.
sent1: if the fact that the toller does not homestead adoxography hold the caracolito is a kind of nominative a Scythian. sent2: if the toller does not homestead adoxography then the caracolito is secular but not a nominative. sent3: if that the sharksucker is not unifilar is not incorrect the toller is parasitic. sent4: that the sharksucker does quieten clawback is correct if the fact that the caracolito is secular is false. sent5: the sharksucker does quieten clawback but it is not parasitic if the caracolito is not secular. sent6: the sharksucker does quieten clawback and is parasitic. sent7: the fact that the caracolito is unifilar is not incorrect. sent8: if the sharksucker is not a kind of a nominative then the toller is a kind of a Scythian and does not quieten clawback. sent9: something is a boil if it is germfree. sent10: if the caracolito is not secular then the sharksucker does quieten clawback and is parasitic. sent11: the caracolito is not urogenital. sent12: the caracolito does quieten clawback. sent13: the kinase is not secular. sent14: either the toller is nominative or it is unifilar or both. sent15: the fact that the toller is not a Ghana is correct. sent16: the sharksucker quietens clawback. sent17: the sharksucker is not a nominative if it is non-parasitic and it is unifilar. sent18: if something that does not quieten clawback homesteads adoxography then it is not a Wiccan. sent19: the caracolito is Scythian if the toller is unifilar. sent20: if the toller is a nominative the caracolito is a Scythian. sent21: the toller is parasitic. sent22: the toller is parasitic but it is not a nominative if the sharksucker is not unifilar. sent23: if something is a kind of a Scythian the fact that it does homestead adoxography is not false.
sent14 & sent20 & sent19 -> int1: the caracolito is Scythian.; sent23 -> int2: the caracolito homesteads adoxography if the fact that it is a Scythian hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the caracolito does homestead adoxography.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caracolito is not Wiccan.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the caracolito is not a kind of a Wiccan but it homesteads adoxography.;
$hypothesis$ = the sharksucker quietens clawback but it is not parasitic if the caracolito is not Wiccan. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the toller does not homestead adoxography hold the caracolito is a kind of nominative a Scythian. sent2: if the toller does not homestead adoxography then the caracolito is secular but not a nominative. sent3: if that the sharksucker is not unifilar is not incorrect the toller is parasitic. sent4: that the sharksucker does quieten clawback is correct if the fact that the caracolito is secular is false. sent5: the sharksucker does quieten clawback but it is not parasitic if the caracolito is not secular. sent6: the sharksucker does quieten clawback and is parasitic. sent7: the fact that the caracolito is unifilar is not incorrect. sent8: if the sharksucker is not a kind of a nominative then the toller is a kind of a Scythian and does not quieten clawback. sent9: something is a boil if it is germfree. sent10: if the caracolito is not secular then the sharksucker does quieten clawback and is parasitic. sent11: the caracolito is not urogenital. sent12: the caracolito does quieten clawback. sent13: the kinase is not secular. sent14: either the toller is nominative or it is unifilar or both. sent15: the fact that the toller is not a Ghana is correct. sent16: the sharksucker quietens clawback. sent17: the sharksucker is not a nominative if it is non-parasitic and it is unifilar. sent18: if something that does not quieten clawback homesteads adoxography then it is not a Wiccan. sent19: the caracolito is Scythian if the toller is unifilar. sent20: if the toller is a nominative the caracolito is a Scythian. sent21: the toller is parasitic. sent22: the toller is parasitic but it is not a nominative if the sharksucker is not unifilar. sent23: if something is a kind of a Scythian the fact that it does homestead adoxography is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent20 & sent19 -> int1: the caracolito is Scythian.; sent23 -> int2: the caracolito homesteads adoxography if the fact that it is a Scythian hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the caracolito does homestead adoxography.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caracolito is not Wiccan.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the caracolito is not a kind of a Wiccan but it homesteads adoxography.; __UNKNOWN__