that the basilisk is consolable is not false.
sent1: the fact that the basilisk is not consolable is not wrong if there is something such that it does not outgeneral redetermination and it is a mainmast. sent2: something is consolable and is a kind of a Nibelung if it is not Panhellenic. sent3: if there is something such that that it is Panhellenic hold then that the organelle is consolable is not false. sent4: a mainmast that is not a wilding is non-rh-negative. sent5: if there is something such that it is a Nibelung then the fact that the organelle is a kind of Panhellenic a traditionalism is true. sent6: something is rh-negative if it does not knead. sent7: if the zinkenite is a kind of a wilding it does not outgeneral redetermination and it is a kind of a mainmast. sent8: the fact that the zinkenite does not outgeneral redetermination hold if it is a wilding. sent9: that that the basilisk does not knead and is not a traditionalism hold is not true if the organelle is not rh-negative. sent10: there is something such that it does not outgeneral redetermination. sent11: that the organelle is not rh-negative but it is a mainmast hold if it outgenerals redetermination. sent12: there exists something such that it is a Nibelung. sent13: the basilisk is not consolable if there is something such that it does outgeneral redetermination and is a kind of a mainmast. sent14: the organelle is Panhellenic. sent15: the zinkenite does not outgeneral redetermination. sent16: if something is a kind of a Nibelung it is consolable. sent17: the organelle is Panhellenic if there is something such that it is a Nibelung. sent18: something does not knead if it is Panhellenic and it is a traditionalism. sent19: the zinkenite is a kind of a wilding if the organelle is rh-negative.
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the organelle is both not non-Panhellenic and a traditionalism.; sent18 -> int2: if the organelle is Panhellenic and it is a kind of a traditionalism it does not knead.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the organelle does not knead.; sent6 -> int4: the organelle is rh-negative if it does not knead.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the organelle is rh-negative.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the zinkenite is wilding.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the zinkenite does not outgeneral redetermination but it is a kind of a mainmast.; int7 -> int8: that something does not outgeneral redetermination but it is a mainmast is not wrong.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the basilisk is consolable.
sent16 -> int9: that the basilisk is consolable is not false if it is a Nibelung.;
$hypothesis$ = that the basilisk is consolable is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the basilisk is not consolable is not wrong if there is something such that it does not outgeneral redetermination and it is a mainmast. sent2: something is consolable and is a kind of a Nibelung if it is not Panhellenic. sent3: if there is something such that that it is Panhellenic hold then that the organelle is consolable is not false. sent4: a mainmast that is not a wilding is non-rh-negative. sent5: if there is something such that it is a Nibelung then the fact that the organelle is a kind of Panhellenic a traditionalism is true. sent6: something is rh-negative if it does not knead. sent7: if the zinkenite is a kind of a wilding it does not outgeneral redetermination and it is a kind of a mainmast. sent8: the fact that the zinkenite does not outgeneral redetermination hold if it is a wilding. sent9: that that the basilisk does not knead and is not a traditionalism hold is not true if the organelle is not rh-negative. sent10: there is something such that it does not outgeneral redetermination. sent11: that the organelle is not rh-negative but it is a mainmast hold if it outgenerals redetermination. sent12: there exists something such that it is a Nibelung. sent13: the basilisk is not consolable if there is something such that it does outgeneral redetermination and is a kind of a mainmast. sent14: the organelle is Panhellenic. sent15: the zinkenite does not outgeneral redetermination. sent16: if something is a kind of a Nibelung it is consolable. sent17: the organelle is Panhellenic if there is something such that it is a Nibelung. sent18: something does not knead if it is Panhellenic and it is a traditionalism. sent19: the zinkenite is a kind of a wilding if the organelle is rh-negative. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the organelle is both not non-Panhellenic and a traditionalism.; sent18 -> int2: if the organelle is Panhellenic and it is a kind of a traditionalism it does not knead.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the organelle does not knead.; sent6 -> int4: the organelle is rh-negative if it does not knead.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the organelle is rh-negative.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the zinkenite is wilding.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the zinkenite does not outgeneral redetermination but it is a kind of a mainmast.; int7 -> int8: that something does not outgeneral redetermination but it is a mainmast is not wrong.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__