the hematochrome is both a caudate and non-Voltarian.
sent1: if the rhubarb is a kind of a caudate then that the hematochrome is caudate and is not Voltarian is not true. sent2: something is not morphophonemic if the fact that it is monoecious and it is not a kind of a cool does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is non-monoecious the tap does not age tap and it is not Zolaesque. sent4: something is a caudate if the fact that it is a kind of non-monoecious thing that is not a kind of a cool does not hold. sent5: the fact that if the Intelnet is the courante the Intelnet does remit but it is not uncial is not false. sent6: if the sky batches stove the Intelnet is a kind of a courante. sent7: if the tap does not age tap and it is not Zolaesque the sky does batch stove. sent8: the fact that the Intelnet is a remit and not a uncial is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rhubarb is not monoecious and is not a kind of a cool.; assump1 -> int1: the rhubarb is not monoecious.; int1 -> int2: something is not monoecious.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the tap does not age tap and it is not Zolaesque.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the sky batches stove is right.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the Intelnet is a courante.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the Intelnet does remit but it is not a kind of a uncial.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the rhubarb is not monoecious and is not cool is incorrect.; sent4 -> int9: the rhubarb is caudate if the fact that it is not monoecious and not a cool is not right.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the rhubarb is caudate.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is not morphophonemic.
sent2 -> int11: if that the rhubarb is monoecious thing that is not a cool is not correct then it is not morphophonemic.;
$hypothesis$ = the hematochrome is both a caudate and non-Voltarian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rhubarb is a kind of a caudate then that the hematochrome is caudate and is not Voltarian is not true. sent2: something is not morphophonemic if the fact that it is monoecious and it is not a kind of a cool does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is non-monoecious the tap does not age tap and it is not Zolaesque. sent4: something is a caudate if the fact that it is a kind of non-monoecious thing that is not a kind of a cool does not hold. sent5: the fact that if the Intelnet is the courante the Intelnet does remit but it is not uncial is not false. sent6: if the sky batches stove the Intelnet is a kind of a courante. sent7: if the tap does not age tap and it is not Zolaesque the sky does batch stove. sent8: the fact that the Intelnet is a remit and not a uncial is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rhubarb is not monoecious and is not a kind of a cool.; assump1 -> int1: the rhubarb is not monoecious.; int1 -> int2: something is not monoecious.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the tap does not age tap and it is not Zolaesque.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the sky batches stove is right.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the Intelnet is a courante.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the Intelnet does remit but it is not a kind of a uncial.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the rhubarb is not monoecious and is not cool is incorrect.; sent4 -> int9: the rhubarb is caudate if the fact that it is not monoecious and not a cool is not right.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the rhubarb is caudate.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__