the destalinizing episiotomy happens.
sent1: the tasting occurs and the onslaught occurs. sent2: the cover-up occurs and the Hertzianness occurs. sent3: the elbowing does not occur if that the baas and the seminalness occurs is not false. sent4: the rerunning mestizo does not occur if the elbowing does not occur. sent5: the lighting does not occur. sent6: if the unaggressiveness does not occur then that the elbowing does not occur but the rerunning mestizo happens is wrong. sent7: that the unaggressiveness occurs is not false. sent8: that the rerunning mestizo and the unaggressiveness occurs is brought about by that the protesting supported does not occur. sent9: if the baas does not occur the destalinizing episiotomy does not occur. sent10: the gymnasticsness occurs. sent11: that the icing does not occur is brought about by that the trundling Colon does not occur. sent12: the patellarness does not occur. sent13: if the seminalness does not occur then both the destalinizing episiotomy and the baas occurs. sent14: the archaeologicalness occurs. sent15: the unaggressiveness occurs if the protesting supported does not occur. sent16: the destalinizing geotropism does not occur. sent17: that the incurvation does not occur causes the non-backedness. sent18: the protesting supported does not occur. sent19: the rerunning Melospiza happens. sent20: the seminalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the baas happens.; assump1 & sent20 -> int1: both the baas and the seminalness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the elbowing does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the rerunning mestizo does not occur.; sent8 & sent18 -> int4: that the rerunning mestizo occurs and the unaggressiveness happens hold.; int4 -> int5: the rerunning mestizo happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the baas does not occur.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the destalinizing episiotomy happens hold.
$hypothesis$ = the destalinizing episiotomy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the tasting occurs and the onslaught occurs. sent2: the cover-up occurs and the Hertzianness occurs. sent3: the elbowing does not occur if that the baas and the seminalness occurs is not false. sent4: the rerunning mestizo does not occur if the elbowing does not occur. sent5: the lighting does not occur. sent6: if the unaggressiveness does not occur then that the elbowing does not occur but the rerunning mestizo happens is wrong. sent7: that the unaggressiveness occurs is not false. sent8: that the rerunning mestizo and the unaggressiveness occurs is brought about by that the protesting supported does not occur. sent9: if the baas does not occur the destalinizing episiotomy does not occur. sent10: the gymnasticsness occurs. sent11: that the icing does not occur is brought about by that the trundling Colon does not occur. sent12: the patellarness does not occur. sent13: if the seminalness does not occur then both the destalinizing episiotomy and the baas occurs. sent14: the archaeologicalness occurs. sent15: the unaggressiveness occurs if the protesting supported does not occur. sent16: the destalinizing geotropism does not occur. sent17: that the incurvation does not occur causes the non-backedness. sent18: the protesting supported does not occur. sent19: the rerunning Melospiza happens. sent20: the seminalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the baas happens.; assump1 & sent20 -> int1: both the baas and the seminalness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the elbowing does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the rerunning mestizo does not occur.; sent8 & sent18 -> int4: that the rerunning mestizo occurs and the unaggressiveness happens hold.; int4 -> int5: the rerunning mestizo happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the baas does not occur.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__