the reigning humbleness happens.
sent1: the baryticness does not occur but the resistiveness occurs. sent2: the backgammon occurs if the Unitarianness does not occur. sent3: the variation occurs if the esophagealness does not occur. sent4: the baa does not occur. sent5: the inefficientness happens. sent6: the bedlessness does not occur. sent7: if not the baa but the staling sumac occurs the fact that the thyrotoxicness occurs is true. sent8: the CBC does not occur. sent9: the smashing ladle happens. sent10: the arthroplasty does not occur. sent11: the bacchanticness but not the productiveness happens. sent12: the seminalness happens. sent13: the staling sumac happens. sent14: that the Cockney and the non-chalybeateness occurs is not true. sent15: if that the counterploting but not the reigning humbleness happens does not hold then the Mishnaicness occurs. sent16: the mate occurs. sent17: if that the celebration occurs and the inappropriateness does not occur is wrong the staling sumac does not occur. sent18: if the Mishnaicness happens then the thyrotoxicness does not occur. sent19: if the smashing subdominant does not occur and the diapedesis occurs the interdepartmentalness occurs. sent20: that the esophagealness happens is prevented by that the flying occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the counterploting occurs but the reigning humbleness does not occur is incorrect.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the Mishnaicness occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the thyrotoxicness does not occur.; sent4 & sent13 -> int3: not the baa but the staling sumac happens.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the thyrotoxicness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the counterplot happens but the reigning humbleness does not occur.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the reigning humbleness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the reigning humbleness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the baryticness does not occur but the resistiveness occurs. sent2: the backgammon occurs if the Unitarianness does not occur. sent3: the variation occurs if the esophagealness does not occur. sent4: the baa does not occur. sent5: the inefficientness happens. sent6: the bedlessness does not occur. sent7: if not the baa but the staling sumac occurs the fact that the thyrotoxicness occurs is true. sent8: the CBC does not occur. sent9: the smashing ladle happens. sent10: the arthroplasty does not occur. sent11: the bacchanticness but not the productiveness happens. sent12: the seminalness happens. sent13: the staling sumac happens. sent14: that the Cockney and the non-chalybeateness occurs is not true. sent15: if that the counterploting but not the reigning humbleness happens does not hold then the Mishnaicness occurs. sent16: the mate occurs. sent17: if that the celebration occurs and the inappropriateness does not occur is wrong the staling sumac does not occur. sent18: if the Mishnaicness happens then the thyrotoxicness does not occur. sent19: if the smashing subdominant does not occur and the diapedesis occurs the interdepartmentalness occurs. sent20: that the esophagealness happens is prevented by that the flying occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the counterploting occurs but the reigning humbleness does not occur is incorrect.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the Mishnaicness occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the thyrotoxicness does not occur.; sent4 & sent13 -> int3: not the baa but the staling sumac happens.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the thyrotoxicness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the counterplot happens but the reigning humbleness does not occur.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__