there is something such that if it does not disincarnate that it is nonmagnetic and stored-program is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not disincarnate then that it is both not nonmagnetic and stored-program is not correct. sent2: if the dust does not disincarnate it is nonmagnetic and it is stored-program. sent3: the fact that the dust is not aplacental but a lodge is incorrect if it does not desexualize Togaviridae. sent4: if the lolly is not inadvisable then that it is not stored-program and desexualizes viscus is false. sent5: the fact that something does not desexualize epicarp but it is a kind of a Luvaridae is not correct if it is not stored-program. sent6: if the dust does not disincarnate then that it is a kind of nonmagnetic thing that is stored-program is wrong. sent7: there is something such that if that it does not disincarnate is right then it is not magnetic and it is stored-program. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a lawyerbush the fact that it does not mound escapee and is quadraphonic is not right. sent9: that the wolffish is a kind of non-unadaptable thing that does urticate unsteadiness is incorrect if it is not a simal. sent10: that the dust is not magnetic but it is stored-program is wrong if it does disincarnate. sent11: there is something such that if it is not advisable the fact that it does not soften and it is not unprophetic is false. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it disincarnates hold then the fact that it is not magnetic and it is stored-program does not hold. sent13: if the dust does not disincarnate the fact that it is a kind of magnetic thing that is stored-program is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not tarnish then that it does not mound escapee and is a kind of a dither does not hold.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the escapee does not desexualize epicarp and is a Luvaridae is false if it is not stored-program.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not disincarnate that it is nonmagnetic and stored-program is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not disincarnate then that it is both not nonmagnetic and stored-program is not correct. sent2: if the dust does not disincarnate it is nonmagnetic and it is stored-program. sent3: the fact that the dust is not aplacental but a lodge is incorrect if it does not desexualize Togaviridae. sent4: if the lolly is not inadvisable then that it is not stored-program and desexualizes viscus is false. sent5: the fact that something does not desexualize epicarp but it is a kind of a Luvaridae is not correct if it is not stored-program. sent6: if the dust does not disincarnate then that it is a kind of nonmagnetic thing that is stored-program is wrong. sent7: there is something such that if that it does not disincarnate is right then it is not magnetic and it is stored-program. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a lawyerbush the fact that it does not mound escapee and is quadraphonic is not right. sent9: that the wolffish is a kind of non-unadaptable thing that does urticate unsteadiness is incorrect if it is not a simal. sent10: that the dust is not magnetic but it is stored-program is wrong if it does disincarnate. sent11: there is something such that if it is not advisable the fact that it does not soften and it is not unprophetic is false. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it disincarnates hold then the fact that it is not magnetic and it is stored-program does not hold. sent13: if the dust does not disincarnate the fact that it is a kind of magnetic thing that is stored-program is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not tarnish then that it does not mound escapee and is a kind of a dither does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__