the corroding Colinus happens.
sent1: the fact that the ambulation occurs is not false if the fact that the reelection occurs and the exulting meed does not occur does not hold. sent2: if the run-up occurs the corroding Colinus occurs. sent3: the exulting meed and the dwarf occurs. sent4: the fact that the exulting meed does not occur hold if the reelection does not occur. sent5: the tuberculateness happens if that not the clawing playback but the tractableness happens is not true. sent6: if the clawing playback does not occur but the tractableness happens then the reelection does not occur. sent7: if the dwarf occurs then that the run-up and the non-tuberculateness happens is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clawing playback does not occur and the tractableness occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reelection does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the exulting meed does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the exulting meed occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that not the clawing playback but the tractableness occurs is false.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the tuberculateness occurs.;
the corroding Colinus does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the corroding Colinus happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ambulation occurs is not false if the fact that the reelection occurs and the exulting meed does not occur does not hold. sent2: if the run-up occurs the corroding Colinus occurs. sent3: the exulting meed and the dwarf occurs. sent4: the fact that the exulting meed does not occur hold if the reelection does not occur. sent5: the tuberculateness happens if that not the clawing playback but the tractableness happens is not true. sent6: if the clawing playback does not occur but the tractableness happens then the reelection does not occur. sent7: if the dwarf occurs then that the run-up and the non-tuberculateness happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clawing playback does not occur and the tractableness occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reelection does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the exulting meed does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the exulting meed occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that not the clawing playback but the tractableness occurs is false.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the tuberculateness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__