the jam empties tiebreaker.
sent1: something is a sweetbread if the fact that it is not fortunate and/or is not calcic does not hold. sent2: that the wits does empty tiebreaker and is not a teg does not hold. sent3: the jam sniffs airmail. sent4: that the shade is calcic is true. sent5: something does not empty tiebreaker if it is fortunate and sniffs advancer. sent6: the jam is fortunate if the wits is calcic. sent7: the jam sniffs advancer. sent8: if something is a kind of a Tenrecidae then it does empty tiebreaker. sent9: the wits is not fortunate if it is a kind of calcic thing that is a Tenrecidae. sent10: the jam is a FDIC and it is a demotion. sent11: the wits is not a Tenrecidae and empties tiebreaker. sent12: the wits is not a Tenrecidae but it is calcic. sent13: the jam is not calcic and is a Tenrecidae if the wits is not fortunate. sent14: that the protactinium is not fortunate or it is not calcic or both is not correct. sent15: The advancer sniffs jam. sent16: the fact that the wits is not a Tenrecidae is not incorrect. sent17: the fact that something is not fortunate is correct if it is a kind of a Tenrecidae and it does sniff advancer. sent18: if that something is not an opium is not wrong the fact that that it does not sniff advancer and is a kind of a teg is correct is not correct. sent19: the wits is fortunate thing that is disreputable.
sent12 -> int1: the wits is calcic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the jam is fortunate.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the jam is a kind of fortunate thing that sniffs advancer.; sent5 -> int4: if the jam is fortunate and it does sniff advancer then it does not empty tiebreaker.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the protactinium is a sweetbread and it is a kind of a pistol.
sent1 -> int5: if that the protactinium is not fortunate or it is not calcic or both is not right that it is a sweetbread is not incorrect.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the protactinium is a kind of a sweetbread.; sent2 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does empty tiebreaker and is not a kind of a teg is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the jam empties tiebreaker. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a sweetbread if the fact that it is not fortunate and/or is not calcic does not hold. sent2: that the wits does empty tiebreaker and is not a teg does not hold. sent3: the jam sniffs airmail. sent4: that the shade is calcic is true. sent5: something does not empty tiebreaker if it is fortunate and sniffs advancer. sent6: the jam is fortunate if the wits is calcic. sent7: the jam sniffs advancer. sent8: if something is a kind of a Tenrecidae then it does empty tiebreaker. sent9: the wits is not fortunate if it is a kind of calcic thing that is a Tenrecidae. sent10: the jam is a FDIC and it is a demotion. sent11: the wits is not a Tenrecidae and empties tiebreaker. sent12: the wits is not a Tenrecidae but it is calcic. sent13: the jam is not calcic and is a Tenrecidae if the wits is not fortunate. sent14: that the protactinium is not fortunate or it is not calcic or both is not correct. sent15: The advancer sniffs jam. sent16: the fact that the wits is not a Tenrecidae is not incorrect. sent17: the fact that something is not fortunate is correct if it is a kind of a Tenrecidae and it does sniff advancer. sent18: if that something is not an opium is not wrong the fact that that it does not sniff advancer and is a kind of a teg is correct is not correct. sent19: the wits is fortunate thing that is disreputable. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the wits is calcic.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the jam is fortunate.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the jam is a kind of fortunate thing that sniffs advancer.; sent5 -> int4: if the jam is fortunate and it does sniff advancer then it does not empty tiebreaker.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__