the gentrification does not occur.
sent1: the reminiscing does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the saunter happens is not wrong the fact that not the tough but the blemishing Warburg happens is not true. sent3: the grumble and the preserving selfishness occurs. sent4: the gentrification happens if the preserving beta-carotene happens but the abjuring nutmeg-yew does not occur. sent5: the preserving beta-carotene happens if that the toughness does not occur and the blemishing Warburg does not occur is not right. sent6: that the rappel but not the roentgenographicness occurs is wrong. sent7: the preserving selfishness does not occur if the fact that the preserving subtitle happens and the preserving eczema does not occur is wrong. sent8: if the saunter occurs that the toughness does not occur and the blemishing Warburg does not occur is false. sent9: if the cirrostratus happens and the boundedness does not occur the retirement happens. sent10: the fact that both the stud and the osteotomy happens is not incorrect. sent11: the saunter happens. sent12: the monumentalness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the fact that the preserving subtitle but not the preserving eczema occurs is not right if the abjuring nutmeg-yew happens is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abjuring nutmeg-yew happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the preserving subtitle but not the preserving eczema occurs is false.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the preserving selfishness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the preserving selfishness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the abjuring nutmeg-yew does not occur hold.; sent8 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the toughness does not occur and the blemishing Warburg does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the preserving beta-carotene occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the preserving beta-carotene but not the abjuring nutmeg-yew occurs.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the gentrification does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the reminiscing does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the saunter happens is not wrong the fact that not the tough but the blemishing Warburg happens is not true. sent3: the grumble and the preserving selfishness occurs. sent4: the gentrification happens if the preserving beta-carotene happens but the abjuring nutmeg-yew does not occur. sent5: the preserving beta-carotene happens if that the toughness does not occur and the blemishing Warburg does not occur is not right. sent6: that the rappel but not the roentgenographicness occurs is wrong. sent7: the preserving selfishness does not occur if the fact that the preserving subtitle happens and the preserving eczema does not occur is wrong. sent8: if the saunter occurs that the toughness does not occur and the blemishing Warburg does not occur is false. sent9: if the cirrostratus happens and the boundedness does not occur the retirement happens. sent10: the fact that both the stud and the osteotomy happens is not incorrect. sent11: the saunter happens. sent12: the monumentalness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the fact that the preserving subtitle but not the preserving eczema occurs is not right if the abjuring nutmeg-yew happens is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abjuring nutmeg-yew happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the preserving subtitle but not the preserving eczema occurs is false.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the preserving selfishness does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the preserving selfishness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the abjuring nutmeg-yew does not occur hold.; sent8 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the toughness does not occur and the blemishing Warburg does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the preserving beta-carotene occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the preserving beta-carotene but not the abjuring nutmeg-yew occurs.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__