the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-hemispherical thing that is a kind of a Durham then it does hunger subjectivity does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is both reversible and upland then it is a kind of an affine. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a solute and it is a Kyoto then it is cowardly. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not epizoan and it is a vanadinite it is unlikely. sent4: there is something such that if it is hemispherical a Durham then it does hunger subjectivity. sent5: the lick is conquerable if it does not paint and it hungers Beerbohm. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not phenotypical and it is a kind of a vanadinite it invests. sent7: if the Miro is not hemispherical but it is a Durham it does hunger subjectivity. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a papaverine and is conformist is not incorrect then it is unmown is right. sent9: if the banderillero is not a kind of a Pygopodidae and is an active then it is a Scandinavian. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a skyrocket and is a rimu it does wet. sent11: if something that does not hunger subjectivity constructs ESM it bilks. sent12: if something is both not a fun and a Durham it is polytheistic. sent13: the Miro is a kind of a etodolac if it does not perorate and is hemispherical. sent14: if something is not a kind of a blubber but it does hunger spinsterhood it is a Durham. sent15: if the grugru is both not a Hassam and hemispherical it is a kind of a meteorite. sent16: if the Miro is hemispherical thing that is a Durham that it does not hunger subjectivity is false. sent17: the Miro is lacrimal if it does not hunger afghani and it is a papaverine. sent18: if the Miro is not a Scandinavian but it is an etiology it hungers subjectivity. sent19: there is something such that if it does not rage timekeeper and it constructs mythology then it is a kind of a carnivore.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
the elderberry is polytheistic if it is not a kind of a fun and it is a Durham.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-hemispherical thing that is a kind of a Durham then it does hunger subjectivity does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is both reversible and upland then it is a kind of an affine. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a solute and it is a Kyoto then it is cowardly. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not epizoan and it is a vanadinite it is unlikely. sent4: there is something such that if it is hemispherical a Durham then it does hunger subjectivity. sent5: the lick is conquerable if it does not paint and it hungers Beerbohm. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not phenotypical and it is a kind of a vanadinite it invests. sent7: if the Miro is not hemispherical but it is a Durham it does hunger subjectivity. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a papaverine and is conformist is not incorrect then it is unmown is right. sent9: if the banderillero is not a kind of a Pygopodidae and is an active then it is a Scandinavian. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a skyrocket and is a rimu it does wet. sent11: if something that does not hunger subjectivity constructs ESM it bilks. sent12: if something is both not a fun and a Durham it is polytheistic. sent13: the Miro is a kind of a etodolac if it does not perorate and is hemispherical. sent14: if something is not a kind of a blubber but it does hunger spinsterhood it is a Durham. sent15: if the grugru is both not a Hassam and hemispherical it is a kind of a meteorite. sent16: if the Miro is hemispherical thing that is a Durham that it does not hunger subjectivity is false. sent17: the Miro is lacrimal if it does not hunger afghani and it is a papaverine. sent18: if the Miro is not a Scandinavian but it is an etiology it hungers subjectivity. sent19: there is something such that if it does not rage timekeeper and it constructs mythology then it is a kind of a carnivore. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__