the baedeker is not a kind of a better.
sent1: the weld is not a waxwork and not a major if the openbill is not a kind of a major. sent2: the fact that something is not a kind of a waxwork and it is not a polysemant is false if it is a Arilus. sent3: if that the baedeker is better and/or is a polysemant is not correct then the weld is not a kind of a better. sent4: if the fact that something is not a waxwork and it is not a polysemant does not hold then it does reflect. sent5: the eelgrass does not strangulate yashmak if there is something such that that it is not isometrics and it does strangulate yashmak is not correct. sent6: if the Bruneian is not a Arilus then the fact that it does reflect and is a polysemant is wrong. sent7: if the weld is not a kind of a waxwork and is not a major then the baedeker is a kind of a better. sent8: that the Bruneian is not a kind of a Arilus hold. sent9: that the Bruneian does reflect is not wrong if the openbill is unapologetic. sent10: if the weld does strangulate blush then the Bruneian does not strangulate chloroquine and does strangulate yashmak. sent11: if the Bruneian is not a major that the openbill does reflect and does deserve adiposity is not true. sent12: if the Bruneian does not strangulate chloroquine and strangulates yashmak then the openbill is a kind of a Arilus. sent13: the weld does strangulate blush. sent14: there is something such that that it is not isometrics and strangulates yashmak does not hold. sent15: the Bruneian is not a waxwork if that the weld is not better is not wrong. sent16: that if the openbill is the major then the openbill is unapologetic is not false. sent17: something is not a major or is not unapologetic or both if it is not a waxwork. sent18: if the eelgrass does not strangulate yashmak then it is a Arilus and it strangulates chloroquine. sent19: something is not better if it majors. sent20: if that something does reflect and it is a kind of a polysemant does not hold then it does not reflect. sent21: that the weld is a waxwork that does reflect is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the openbill majors.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the openbill is unapologetic.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Bruneian reflects.; sent20 -> int3: the Bruneian does not reflect if that it does reflect and is a polysemant does not hold.; sent6 & sent8 -> int4: that the Bruneian does reflect and is a kind of a polysemant is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Bruneian does not reflect.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the openbill is not a major.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the weld is not a waxwork and not a major.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the baedeker is not better.
sent19 -> int9: if the baedeker is a major it is not better.; sent4 -> int10: the openbill does reflect if the fact that it is not a waxwork and not a polysemant does not hold.; sent2 -> int11: that the openbill is not a kind of a waxwork and is not a polysemant is false if it is a Arilus.; sent10 & sent13 -> int12: the Bruneian does not strangulate chloroquine and strangulates yashmak.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: the openbill is a kind of a Arilus.; int11 & int13 -> int14: that the openbill is not a waxwork and it is not a polysemant does not hold.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the openbill does reflect.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it does reflect.;
$hypothesis$ = the baedeker is not a kind of a better. ; $context$ = sent1: the weld is not a waxwork and not a major if the openbill is not a kind of a major. sent2: the fact that something is not a kind of a waxwork and it is not a polysemant is false if it is a Arilus. sent3: if that the baedeker is better and/or is a polysemant is not correct then the weld is not a kind of a better. sent4: if the fact that something is not a waxwork and it is not a polysemant does not hold then it does reflect. sent5: the eelgrass does not strangulate yashmak if there is something such that that it is not isometrics and it does strangulate yashmak is not correct. sent6: if the Bruneian is not a Arilus then the fact that it does reflect and is a polysemant is wrong. sent7: if the weld is not a kind of a waxwork and is not a major then the baedeker is a kind of a better. sent8: that the Bruneian is not a kind of a Arilus hold. sent9: that the Bruneian does reflect is not wrong if the openbill is unapologetic. sent10: if the weld does strangulate blush then the Bruneian does not strangulate chloroquine and does strangulate yashmak. sent11: if the Bruneian is not a major that the openbill does reflect and does deserve adiposity is not true. sent12: if the Bruneian does not strangulate chloroquine and strangulates yashmak then the openbill is a kind of a Arilus. sent13: the weld does strangulate blush. sent14: there is something such that that it is not isometrics and strangulates yashmak does not hold. sent15: the Bruneian is not a waxwork if that the weld is not better is not wrong. sent16: that if the openbill is the major then the openbill is unapologetic is not false. sent17: something is not a major or is not unapologetic or both if it is not a waxwork. sent18: if the eelgrass does not strangulate yashmak then it is a Arilus and it strangulates chloroquine. sent19: something is not better if it majors. sent20: if that something does reflect and it is a kind of a polysemant does not hold then it does not reflect. sent21: that the weld is a waxwork that does reflect is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the openbill majors.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the openbill is unapologetic.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the Bruneian reflects.; sent20 -> int3: the Bruneian does not reflect if that it does reflect and is a polysemant does not hold.; sent6 & sent8 -> int4: that the Bruneian does reflect and is a kind of a polysemant is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Bruneian does not reflect.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the openbill is not a major.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the weld is not a waxwork and not a major.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__