the fact that the incompetentness does not occur and the abactinalness happens is incorrect.
sent1: the panicking myology and the rerunning rifleman occurs. sent2: if the arthromericness happens and the blastoporalness occurs then the fact that the anaclinalness does not occur is correct. sent3: if the Saharan occurs the fact that the incompetentness does not occur and the abactinalness happens is wrong. sent4: the fact that the rerunning merino does not occur and the panicking myology does not occur is not incorrect if the rerunning rifleman does not occur. sent5: that the mythicness happens is prevented by that the physiologicalness happens and the irrigation occurs. sent6: the irrigation occurs if the panicking myology happens. sent7: the physiologicalness but not the rerunning merino occurs. sent8: that the blastoporalness does not occur brings about that the Saharanness happens. sent9: that the Genoese happens and/or the blastoporalness does not occur is brought about by that the anaclinalness happens. sent10: if the rerunning merino does not occur that the irrigation does not occur and the physiologicalness does not occur is false. sent11: the mythicness happens if the fact that the anaclinalness does not occur is correct. sent12: if the arthromericness does not occur not the incompetentness but the abactinalness happens. sent13: the arthromericness and the Genoese occurs.
sent13 -> int1: the arthromericness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blastoporalness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the arthromericness and the blastoporalness happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the anaclinalness does not occur is true.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the mythicness happens.; sent7 -> int5: the physiologicalness occurs.; sent1 -> int6: the panicking myology occurs.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the irrigation occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the physiologicalness occurs and the irrigation happens.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the mythicness does not occur.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the blastoporalness does not occur.; int11 & sent8 -> int12: the Saharan happens.; int12 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the incompetentness does not occur and the abactinalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the incompetentness does not occur and the abactinalness happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the panicking myology and the rerunning rifleman occurs. sent2: if the arthromericness happens and the blastoporalness occurs then the fact that the anaclinalness does not occur is correct. sent3: if the Saharan occurs the fact that the incompetentness does not occur and the abactinalness happens is wrong. sent4: the fact that the rerunning merino does not occur and the panicking myology does not occur is not incorrect if the rerunning rifleman does not occur. sent5: that the mythicness happens is prevented by that the physiologicalness happens and the irrigation occurs. sent6: the irrigation occurs if the panicking myology happens. sent7: the physiologicalness but not the rerunning merino occurs. sent8: that the blastoporalness does not occur brings about that the Saharanness happens. sent9: that the Genoese happens and/or the blastoporalness does not occur is brought about by that the anaclinalness happens. sent10: if the rerunning merino does not occur that the irrigation does not occur and the physiologicalness does not occur is false. sent11: the mythicness happens if the fact that the anaclinalness does not occur is correct. sent12: if the arthromericness does not occur not the incompetentness but the abactinalness happens. sent13: the arthromericness and the Genoese occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the arthromericness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blastoporalness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the arthromericness and the blastoporalness happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the anaclinalness does not occur is true.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the mythicness happens.; sent7 -> int5: the physiologicalness occurs.; sent1 -> int6: the panicking myology occurs.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the irrigation occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the physiologicalness occurs and the irrigation happens.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the mythicness does not occur.; int4 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the blastoporalness does not occur.; int11 & sent8 -> int12: the Saharan happens.; int12 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__