the syrup is not a negligee and/or is relative.
sent1: there are onshore things. sent2: if the spathe does not expostulate then that either the syrup is not a negligee or it is a kind of a relative or both is not correct. sent3: the spathe does not expostulate if either the colleague is not heartless or it is not a gorse or both. sent4: if there is something such that it is not onshore the fact that that the liberator means Pepsi but it is not a Ecuadorian is false is correct. sent5: if there is something such that that it is non-onshore is not false then that the liberator does mean Pepsi and is Ecuadorian is not correct. sent6: something is not onshore. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it means Pepsi and is not a Ecuadorian does not hold the colleague is not heartless.
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the liberator means Pepsi but it is not a Ecuadorian does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it means Pepsi and is not a Ecuadorian does not hold.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the colleague is not heartless.; int3 -> int4: the colleague either is not heartless or is not a gorse or both.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the spathe does not expostulate hold.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the syrup is not a negligee and/or is relative. ; $context$ = sent1: there are onshore things. sent2: if the spathe does not expostulate then that either the syrup is not a negligee or it is a kind of a relative or both is not correct. sent3: the spathe does not expostulate if either the colleague is not heartless or it is not a gorse or both. sent4: if there is something such that it is not onshore the fact that that the liberator means Pepsi but it is not a Ecuadorian is false is correct. sent5: if there is something such that that it is non-onshore is not false then that the liberator does mean Pepsi and is Ecuadorian is not correct. sent6: something is not onshore. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it means Pepsi and is not a Ecuadorian does not hold the colleague is not heartless. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the liberator means Pepsi but it is not a Ecuadorian does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it means Pepsi and is not a Ecuadorian does not hold.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the colleague is not heartless.; int3 -> int4: the colleague either is not heartless or is not a gorse or both.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the spathe does not expostulate hold.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__