the masjid is endothermic.
sent1: the masjid does axe disruption if the choirboy is a danish and not a SD. sent2: the phoronid is not a harangue if the fact that the approver does bombard and it is plantal does not hold. sent3: the choirboy is not a Cambodian. sent4: something is not endothermic if the fact that it is not a Cambodian and it is a fascist is false. sent5: something is not a kind of a permanent. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it axes disruption and it is not a danish does not hold the masjid is endothermic. sent7: something does axe disruption but it is not a danish. sent8: the fact that that the approver axes disruption and is a danish is not false is not correct. sent9: the night-light is not a kind of a amiodarone if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a permanent. sent10: that the masjid is endothermic but it is not a kind of a danish is not correct. sent11: that the approver axes disruption and it is a kind of a danish is not right if that the phoronid is not a fascist is not incorrect. sent12: if something does axe disruption then the fact that it is both not Cambodian and fascist is not true. sent13: there is something such that that it axes disruption and is a danish is wrong. sent14: if the phoronid is not fascist then the fact that the approver axes disruption and is not a danish is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the masjid is endothermic is true if there is something such that it is a danish.
the masjid is not endothermic.
sent4 -> int1: the masjid is not endothermic if that it is not a kind of a Cambodian and it is a fascist does not hold.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the masjid is not a Cambodian and is fascist is not correct if that it axes disruption is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent9 -> int3: the night-light is not a amiodarone.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a amiodarone.;
$hypothesis$ = the masjid is endothermic. ; $context$ = sent1: the masjid does axe disruption if the choirboy is a danish and not a SD. sent2: the phoronid is not a harangue if the fact that the approver does bombard and it is plantal does not hold. sent3: the choirboy is not a Cambodian. sent4: something is not endothermic if the fact that it is not a Cambodian and it is a fascist is false. sent5: something is not a kind of a permanent. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it axes disruption and it is not a danish does not hold the masjid is endothermic. sent7: something does axe disruption but it is not a danish. sent8: the fact that that the approver axes disruption and is a danish is not false is not correct. sent9: the night-light is not a kind of a amiodarone if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a permanent. sent10: that the masjid is endothermic but it is not a kind of a danish is not correct. sent11: that the approver axes disruption and it is a kind of a danish is not right if that the phoronid is not a fascist is not incorrect. sent12: if something does axe disruption then the fact that it is both not Cambodian and fascist is not true. sent13: there is something such that that it axes disruption and is a danish is wrong. sent14: if the phoronid is not fascist then the fact that the approver axes disruption and is not a danish is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the masjid is endothermic is true if there is something such that it is a danish. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__