that there exists something such that if that it is not a EXEC and it seesaws is wrong then it is pleural is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it does hatch Macrocephalon and is a pyroscope is not right that it overbears is not incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is both non-recessionary and araneidal does not hold it is a Majorana. sent3: that the lamasery does not hatch presentment does not hold if that it does not clinch Timor and it is an excuse is not true. sent4: the fact that the lamasery is reductionist hold if it is not a kind of a EXEC. sent5: if that something is both not a tea-strainer and pleural does not hold it is journalistic. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a loch and does sidle sixties then it is a kind of an argument. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a EXEC it is pleural. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a paranoia and it is a Greek is not wrong it does clinch Timor. sent9: there exists something such that if it is micrometeoritic then it is insentient. sent10: if the lamasery is both not a EXEC and a seesaw it is pleural. sent11: the lamasery is pleural if the fact that it is not a EXEC but a seesaw is incorrect. sent12: if the lamasery is not a kind of a seesaw then it is pleural. sent13: there is something such that if it does sidle peck then it is bureaucratic. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is econometrics and a bracteole is not right it does clinch slagheap. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not ictal and is a kind of a Cameroon is wrong it regenerates.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
if that the lamasery is not a tea-strainer but pleural is incorrect it is not non-journalistic.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it is not a EXEC and it seesaws is wrong then it is pleural is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it does hatch Macrocephalon and is a pyroscope is not right that it overbears is not incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is both non-recessionary and araneidal does not hold it is a Majorana. sent3: that the lamasery does not hatch presentment does not hold if that it does not clinch Timor and it is an excuse is not true. sent4: the fact that the lamasery is reductionist hold if it is not a kind of a EXEC. sent5: if that something is both not a tea-strainer and pleural does not hold it is journalistic. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a loch and does sidle sixties then it is a kind of an argument. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a EXEC it is pleural. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a paranoia and it is a Greek is not wrong it does clinch Timor. sent9: there exists something such that if it is micrometeoritic then it is insentient. sent10: if the lamasery is both not a EXEC and a seesaw it is pleural. sent11: the lamasery is pleural if the fact that it is not a EXEC but a seesaw is incorrect. sent12: if the lamasery is not a kind of a seesaw then it is pleural. sent13: there is something such that if it does sidle peck then it is bureaucratic. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is econometrics and a bracteole is not right it does clinch slagheap. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not ictal and is a kind of a Cameroon is wrong it regenerates. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__