the eutrophication parallels bang.
sent1: if the pain is not a coelacanth then the fact that the eutrophication is lotic but it does not parallel bang is incorrect. sent2: if the pain is a kind of a synthetic then the fact that it is lotic is right. sent3: if something is a kind of a balance the bulimic is a coelacanth and/or it is not lotic. sent4: the fact that the pain is not a coelacanth and it is not a speculator is wrong. sent5: the fact that the pain is not a synthetic and it does not resent pain is wrong. sent6: the lecithin does balance. sent7: the pain balances. sent8: the eutrophication is a kind of a balance if the fact that it does not parallel bang and it is not lotic is wrong. sent9: everything is a abstractness. sent10: something does not overbear carrageen if it is a abstractness and/or it is not a Neel. sent11: if the fact that something is a periwig and is not a kind of a dryopithecine is incorrect then it is not a periwig. sent12: if that something is lotic but it does not parallel bang does not hold then it parallel bang. sent13: the pain is lotic if that it is not a synthetic and it does not resent pain is false. sent14: that something is a kind of a periwig but it is not a dryopithecine is not correct if it does not overbear carrageen. sent15: that the eutrophication does not parallel bang is right if the pain is lotic and it is a coelacanth. sent16: the eutrophication is a kind of a demobilization. sent17: if the fact that the respecter does overbear bang or it is not a fairyland or both is incorrect then the recidivist does balance. sent18: if that the type is a violence is not false then it does resent pain. sent19: the pain parallels bang. sent20: if something is a coelacanth and/or it is not lotic then the pain parallels bang. sent21: the eutrophication does balance. sent22: if something is not a periwig the fact that either it does overbear bang or it is not a fairyland or both does not hold. sent23: the pain is a coelacanth if it is a balance. sent24: the fact that the pain is a synthetic and does not resent pain is false.
sent13 & sent5 -> int1: the pain is not non-lotic.; sent23 & sent7 -> int2: the pain is a coelacanth.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pain is lotic and it is a kind of a coelacanth.; int3 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the eutrophication parallels bang.
sent22 -> int4: the fact that the respecter does overbear bang and/or it is not a fairyland is not right if it is not a periwig.; sent11 -> int5: if that the respecter is a periwig but it is not a dryopithecine is false then it is not a periwig.; sent10 -> int6: the respecter does not overbear carrageen if either it is a abstractness or it is not a Neel or both.; sent9 -> int7: the buckeye is a kind of a abstractness.; int7 -> int8: the buckeye is a abstractness or is not a Neel or both.; int8 -> int9: everything is a abstractness and/or is not a kind of a Neel.; int9 -> int10: the respecter either is a kind of a abstractness or is not a Neel or both.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the respecter does not overbear carrageen.; sent14 -> int12: the fact that the respecter is a periwig but it is not a dryopithecine is incorrect if it does not overbear carrageen.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the respecter is a kind of a periwig that is not a kind of a dryopithecine is not true.; int5 & int13 -> int14: that the respecter is not a periwig is not incorrect.; int4 & int14 -> int15: that the respecter overbears bang and/or is not a fairyland does not hold.; sent17 & int15 -> int16: the recidivist is a kind of a balance.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is a kind of a balance.; int17 & sent3 -> int18: either the bulimic is a coelacanth or it is not lotic or both.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it is a coelacanth or it is not lotic or both.; sent20 & int19 -> int20: the pain parallels bang.;
$hypothesis$ = the eutrophication parallels bang. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pain is not a coelacanth then the fact that the eutrophication is lotic but it does not parallel bang is incorrect. sent2: if the pain is a kind of a synthetic then the fact that it is lotic is right. sent3: if something is a kind of a balance the bulimic is a coelacanth and/or it is not lotic. sent4: the fact that the pain is not a coelacanth and it is not a speculator is wrong. sent5: the fact that the pain is not a synthetic and it does not resent pain is wrong. sent6: the lecithin does balance. sent7: the pain balances. sent8: the eutrophication is a kind of a balance if the fact that it does not parallel bang and it is not lotic is wrong. sent9: everything is a abstractness. sent10: something does not overbear carrageen if it is a abstractness and/or it is not a Neel. sent11: if the fact that something is a periwig and is not a kind of a dryopithecine is incorrect then it is not a periwig. sent12: if that something is lotic but it does not parallel bang does not hold then it parallel bang. sent13: the pain is lotic if that it is not a synthetic and it does not resent pain is false. sent14: that something is a kind of a periwig but it is not a dryopithecine is not correct if it does not overbear carrageen. sent15: that the eutrophication does not parallel bang is right if the pain is lotic and it is a coelacanth. sent16: the eutrophication is a kind of a demobilization. sent17: if the fact that the respecter does overbear bang or it is not a fairyland or both is incorrect then the recidivist does balance. sent18: if that the type is a violence is not false then it does resent pain. sent19: the pain parallels bang. sent20: if something is a coelacanth and/or it is not lotic then the pain parallels bang. sent21: the eutrophication does balance. sent22: if something is not a periwig the fact that either it does overbear bang or it is not a fairyland or both does not hold. sent23: the pain is a coelacanth if it is a balance. sent24: the fact that the pain is a synthetic and does not resent pain is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent5 -> int1: the pain is not non-lotic.; sent23 & sent7 -> int2: the pain is a coelacanth.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pain is lotic and it is a kind of a coelacanth.; int3 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__