the fact that the convolvulus is nectar-rich is not false.
sent1: the fact that that the corneum is not a stuff and is not a kind of a kowtow is incorrect is not wrong if it is not meaningful. sent2: if something is a lay and does clamp then it is not nectar-rich. sent3: the convolvulus is nectar-rich if the corneum does enjoy titfer. sent4: if a non-nectar-rich thing enjoys titfer then it is meaningful. sent5: the corneum is not meaningful. sent6: the Delawarean is a lay.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the corneum is both not a stuff and not a kowtow is false.;
the Delawarean is meaningful.
sent4 -> int2: if the Delawarean is non-nectar-rich and enjoys titfer then it is meaningful.; sent2 -> int3: if the Delawarean is a kind of a lay that is a kind of a clamp the fact that it is not nectar-rich is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the convolvulus is nectar-rich is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the corneum is not a stuff and is not a kind of a kowtow is incorrect is not wrong if it is not meaningful. sent2: if something is a lay and does clamp then it is not nectar-rich. sent3: the convolvulus is nectar-rich if the corneum does enjoy titfer. sent4: if a non-nectar-rich thing enjoys titfer then it is meaningful. sent5: the corneum is not meaningful. sent6: the Delawarean is a lay. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the corneum is both not a stuff and not a kowtow is false.; __UNKNOWN__