that the learner is a kind of a bootleg but it is not agonadal is not correct.
sent1: that the distillation is incestuous and/or it is not phyllodial is wrong. sent2: that the fact that the pelisse is endergonic and commands multiplicand is wrong if the complement is not incestuous hold. sent3: the fact that the complement does command multiplicand and is not a lampblack does not hold. sent4: something is not ampullar or endergonic or both if it is a spyware. sent5: if something either is not ampullar or is endergonic or both then it does not risk Chicago. sent6: if the pelisse does not risk Chicago but it is ampullar then it is a spyware. sent7: if the Communist is a spyware then the learner is a spyware. sent8: the pelisse is incestuous if that the complement commands multiplicand and is not a kind of a lampblack is not correct. sent9: everything is ampullar and it is nodular. sent10: there is something such that it is incestuous. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is both incestuous and a spyware hold then the distillation is not unperceptive. sent12: the pelisse does not risk Chicago if the pentoxide is endergonic. sent13: the fact that the Communist is either Gothic or not Platonistic or both is incorrect. sent14: if something does not risk Chicago then it is a kind of a bootleg and it is not agonadal. sent15: if the pentoxide is incestuous the Communist is a kind of a spyware. sent16: if the distillation is not unperceptive the fact that the learner is a bootleg but it is not agonadal is wrong. sent17: that the learner is a kind of a bootleg and it is agonadal is not true.
sent9 -> int1: the pelisse is both ampullar and nodular.; int1 -> int2: the pelisse is ampullar.; sent8 & sent3 -> int3: the pelisse is incestuous.;
the learner is both a bootleg and non-agonadal.
sent14 -> int4: if the learner does not risk Chicago it does bootleg and is not agonadal.; sent5 -> int5: if the learner is non-ampullar and/or not non-endergonic that it does not risk Chicago is correct.; sent4 -> int6: if the learner is a spyware then the fact that it is not ampullar or endergonic or both hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the learner is a kind of a bootleg but it is not agonadal is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the distillation is incestuous and/or it is not phyllodial is wrong. sent2: that the fact that the pelisse is endergonic and commands multiplicand is wrong if the complement is not incestuous hold. sent3: the fact that the complement does command multiplicand and is not a lampblack does not hold. sent4: something is not ampullar or endergonic or both if it is a spyware. sent5: if something either is not ampullar or is endergonic or both then it does not risk Chicago. sent6: if the pelisse does not risk Chicago but it is ampullar then it is a spyware. sent7: if the Communist is a spyware then the learner is a spyware. sent8: the pelisse is incestuous if that the complement commands multiplicand and is not a kind of a lampblack is not correct. sent9: everything is ampullar and it is nodular. sent10: there is something such that it is incestuous. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is both incestuous and a spyware hold then the distillation is not unperceptive. sent12: the pelisse does not risk Chicago if the pentoxide is endergonic. sent13: the fact that the Communist is either Gothic or not Platonistic or both is incorrect. sent14: if something does not risk Chicago then it is a kind of a bootleg and it is not agonadal. sent15: if the pentoxide is incestuous the Communist is a kind of a spyware. sent16: if the distillation is not unperceptive the fact that the learner is a bootleg but it is not agonadal is wrong. sent17: that the learner is a kind of a bootleg and it is agonadal is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the pelisse is both ampullar and nodular.; int1 -> int2: the pelisse is ampullar.; sent8 & sent3 -> int3: the pelisse is incestuous.; __UNKNOWN__