the fact that if the fact that the catsup does counterclaim is not false the vassal does meet lumpenproletariat is not true.
sent1: if the velveteen does seek NB either the NB does not seek foreperson or it is a shared or both. sent2: if something that does not meet bogmat is non-punic then it meets lumpenproletariat. sent3: something does not seek NB and does not counterclaim if it does not meet bogmat. sent4: something does not seek foreperson and/or is a kind of a counterclaim. sent5: the vassal does not meet bogmat and it is not punic if the velveteen does not seek NB. sent6: the fact that if there is something such that it does not seek foreperson and/or it shares then the catsup is not a counterclaim is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the velveteen does seek NB.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the NB does not seek foreperson or it shares or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not seek foreperson or it is a shared or both.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the catsup is not a kind of a counterclaim.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the catsup is a counterclaim.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the velveteen does not seek NB.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the vassal does not meet bogmat and it is not punic.; sent2 -> int7: the vassal meets lumpenproletariat if it does not meet bogmat and is not punic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the vassal does meet lumpenproletariat is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the velveteen does not meet episiotomy and does not nose disturbance.
sent3 -> int9: that if the vassal does not meet bogmat the vassal does not seek NB and does not counterclaim is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fact that the catsup does counterclaim is not false the vassal does meet lumpenproletariat is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the velveteen does seek NB either the NB does not seek foreperson or it is a shared or both. sent2: if something that does not meet bogmat is non-punic then it meets lumpenproletariat. sent3: something does not seek NB and does not counterclaim if it does not meet bogmat. sent4: something does not seek foreperson and/or is a kind of a counterclaim. sent5: the vassal does not meet bogmat and it is not punic if the velveteen does not seek NB. sent6: the fact that if there is something such that it does not seek foreperson and/or it shares then the catsup is not a counterclaim is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the velveteen does seek NB.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the NB does not seek foreperson or it shares or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not seek foreperson or it is a shared or both.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the catsup is not a kind of a counterclaim.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the catsup is a counterclaim.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the velveteen does not seek NB.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the vassal does not meet bogmat and it is not punic.; sent2 -> int7: the vassal meets lumpenproletariat if it does not meet bogmat and is not punic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the vassal does meet lumpenproletariat is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__