the fact that the empiricist is a gone that is a Faisalabad does not hold.
sent1: the pensioner is not a twayblade. sent2: that the funeral-residence is not a kind of the label if that the funeral-residence does label but it does not front roughage is not right is not false. sent3: the funeral-residence goes if that it is a Faisalabad is true. sent4: the funeral-residence is perinasal if the empiricist fronts roughage. sent5: if the funeral-residence is not unprotective it is a gone that fronts roughage. sent6: the empiricist is a kind of a gone if the funeral-residence is a breast. sent7: something is not a twayblade if that it does front roughage and it breasts is not true. sent8: if that the empiricist is a kind of unprotective thing that is not a label does not hold then that it is not unprotective is not incorrect. sent9: the empiricist is perinasal if it is not unprotective. sent10: if something is not unprotective then it is perinasal thing that is a Faisalabad. sent11: something does breast if it does not front roughage. sent12: the fact that the empiricist is unprotective and is not a kind of a label is not true. sent13: the empiricist is perinasal. sent14: that something goes and it is a Faisalabad is incorrect if it is not a kind of a twayblade. sent15: the sourpuss is protective. sent16: a twayblade is a kind of a label. sent17: that the funeral-residence is perinasal and is autogenous is not correct if the sourpuss is not unprotective. sent18: something is a kind of a mischief if it is not sublingual. sent19: if the empiricist is not perinasal then that it fronts roughage hold. sent20: the funeral-residence does not front roughage if the pensioner is not a kind of a twayblade.
sent20 & sent1 -> int1: the funeral-residence does not front roughage.; sent11 -> int2: the funeral-residence does breast if it does not front roughage.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the funeral-residence is a breast.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the empiricist goes.; sent10 -> int5: the empiricist is perinasal a Faisalabad if it is not unprotective.; sent8 & sent12 -> int6: the empiricist is not unprotective.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the empiricist is perinasal and it is a Faisalabad.; int7 -> int8: the empiricist is a kind of a Faisalabad.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the empiricist is a kind of a gone and it is a kind of a Faisalabad is incorrect.
sent14 -> int9: the fact that the empiricist is a gone and is a Faisalabad is not true if it is not a kind of a twayblade.; sent7 -> int10: if that the empiricist does front roughage and is a breast is not true then that it is not a kind of a twayblade is correct.; sent17 & sent15 -> int11: the fact that the funeral-residence is perinasal and is not non-autogenous is not correct.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of perinasal thing that is autogenous is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the empiricist is a gone that is a Faisalabad does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the pensioner is not a twayblade. sent2: that the funeral-residence is not a kind of the label if that the funeral-residence does label but it does not front roughage is not right is not false. sent3: the funeral-residence goes if that it is a Faisalabad is true. sent4: the funeral-residence is perinasal if the empiricist fronts roughage. sent5: if the funeral-residence is not unprotective it is a gone that fronts roughage. sent6: the empiricist is a kind of a gone if the funeral-residence is a breast. sent7: something is not a twayblade if that it does front roughage and it breasts is not true. sent8: if that the empiricist is a kind of unprotective thing that is not a label does not hold then that it is not unprotective is not incorrect. sent9: the empiricist is perinasal if it is not unprotective. sent10: if something is not unprotective then it is perinasal thing that is a Faisalabad. sent11: something does breast if it does not front roughage. sent12: the fact that the empiricist is unprotective and is not a kind of a label is not true. sent13: the empiricist is perinasal. sent14: that something goes and it is a Faisalabad is incorrect if it is not a kind of a twayblade. sent15: the sourpuss is protective. sent16: a twayblade is a kind of a label. sent17: that the funeral-residence is perinasal and is autogenous is not correct if the sourpuss is not unprotective. sent18: something is a kind of a mischief if it is not sublingual. sent19: if the empiricist is not perinasal then that it fronts roughage hold. sent20: the funeral-residence does not front roughage if the pensioner is not a kind of a twayblade. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent1 -> int1: the funeral-residence does not front roughage.; sent11 -> int2: the funeral-residence does breast if it does not front roughage.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the funeral-residence is a breast.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the empiricist goes.; sent10 -> int5: the empiricist is perinasal a Faisalabad if it is not unprotective.; sent8 & sent12 -> int6: the empiricist is not unprotective.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the empiricist is perinasal and it is a Faisalabad.; int7 -> int8: the empiricist is a kind of a Faisalabad.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__