the fact that the Communion does not occur but the ammoniac happens is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the Communion does not occur and the ammoniac happens is not true if the overthrowing occurs. sent2: that the rummaging does not occur prevents that the hoarding tyrannosaur occurs. sent3: the fact that the Communion does not occur is correct. sent4: the fact that the Prakriticness occurs is not wrong. sent5: if the rummaging does not occur the overthrowing occurs but the hoarding tyrannosaur does not occur. sent6: that both the overthrow and the hoarding tyrannosaur happens is not true. sent7: if the Prakriticness occurs then that the overthrow happens and the hoarding tyrannosaur does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the Communion causes that the rummage does not occur. sent9: the fact that both the weather and the Catholicness occurs is incorrect if the papillariness occurs. sent10: the hoarding tyrannosaur does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the Communion does not occur and the ammoniacness happens is false the rummaging does not occur. sent12: if the inroad occurs then that the audiovisualness happens but the sheltering vogue does not occur is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Communion does not occur and the ammoniac happens is not right.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the rummaging does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the overthrow happens but the hoarding tyrannosaur does not occur.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the overthrow but not the hoarding tyrannosaur happens is not right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Communion does not occur and the ammoniacness happens is false.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Communion does not occur but the ammoniac happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Communion does not occur and the ammoniac happens is not true if the overthrowing occurs. sent2: that the rummaging does not occur prevents that the hoarding tyrannosaur occurs. sent3: the fact that the Communion does not occur is correct. sent4: the fact that the Prakriticness occurs is not wrong. sent5: if the rummaging does not occur the overthrowing occurs but the hoarding tyrannosaur does not occur. sent6: that both the overthrow and the hoarding tyrannosaur happens is not true. sent7: if the Prakriticness occurs then that the overthrow happens and the hoarding tyrannosaur does not occur is incorrect. sent8: the Communion causes that the rummage does not occur. sent9: the fact that both the weather and the Catholicness occurs is incorrect if the papillariness occurs. sent10: the hoarding tyrannosaur does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the Communion does not occur and the ammoniacness happens is false the rummaging does not occur. sent12: if the inroad occurs then that the audiovisualness happens but the sheltering vogue does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Communion does not occur and the ammoniac happens is not right.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the rummaging does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the overthrow happens but the hoarding tyrannosaur does not occur.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the overthrow but not the hoarding tyrannosaur happens is not right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__