if the polishing occurs the emulsifying French does not occur.
sent1: the unsalableness does not occur if the calorimetricness happens. sent2: that the revision does not occur and the inoffensiveness does not occur is not false. sent3: that the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism does not occur is prevented by that not the revision but the inoffensiveness happens. sent4: both the emulsifying Kropotkin and the generaling occurs if the fatality does not occur. sent5: if the revision does not occur and the inoffensiveness does not occur the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism occurs. sent6: that the remodeling witness happens is prevented by that the Shuhaness and the counting happens. sent7: that the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism occurs is prevented by that the emulsifying French does not occur and the nonexploratoriness does not occur. sent8: if the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism does not occur then the polish happens and the thoughtfulness happens. sent9: the adjoining agronomy does not occur if the unfreeness and the Anglicism occurs. sent10: the emulsifying French does not occur and the nonexploratoriness does not occur if the emulsifying Kropotkin occurs. sent11: that the emulsifying French does not occur is triggered by that the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism and the polishing occurs.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polishing happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism occurs and the polishing occurs.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the emulsifying French does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the thoughtfulness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the polishing occurs the emulsifying French does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the unsalableness does not occur if the calorimetricness happens. sent2: that the revision does not occur and the inoffensiveness does not occur is not false. sent3: that the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism does not occur is prevented by that not the revision but the inoffensiveness happens. sent4: both the emulsifying Kropotkin and the generaling occurs if the fatality does not occur. sent5: if the revision does not occur and the inoffensiveness does not occur the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism occurs. sent6: that the remodeling witness happens is prevented by that the Shuhaness and the counting happens. sent7: that the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism occurs is prevented by that the emulsifying French does not occur and the nonexploratoriness does not occur. sent8: if the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism does not occur then the polish happens and the thoughtfulness happens. sent9: the adjoining agronomy does not occur if the unfreeness and the Anglicism occurs. sent10: the emulsifying French does not occur and the nonexploratoriness does not occur if the emulsifying Kropotkin occurs. sent11: that the emulsifying French does not occur is triggered by that the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism and the polishing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polishing happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the adjoining hyperadrenocorticism occurs and the polishing occurs.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the emulsifying French does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__