if the ketosteroid does not strip ketosteroid the chiropractor is not destructive.
sent1: the chiropractor is not destructive if there is something such that it is a caudate or it does stable chiropractor or both. sent2: if the ketosteroid does not strip ketosteroid then it is caudate or does stable chiropractor or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ketosteroid does not strip ketosteroid.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the ketosteroid is a caudate and/or it stables chiropractor.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is caudate and/or it stables chiropractor.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the chiropractor is not destructive is right.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the ketosteroid does not strip ketosteroid the chiropractor is not destructive. ; $context$ = sent1: the chiropractor is not destructive if there is something such that it is a caudate or it does stable chiropractor or both. sent2: if the ketosteroid does not strip ketosteroid then it is caudate or does stable chiropractor or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ketosteroid does not strip ketosteroid.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the ketosteroid is a caudate and/or it stables chiropractor.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is caudate and/or it stables chiropractor.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the chiropractor is not destructive is right.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__