the tugboat is a kind of a patty-pan and it smells geology.
sent1: something is not a Pickett if the fact that it is a philanthropy and it is a cassette is incorrect. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is not apologetics and it is a mignonette is not correct the outfit is not a kind of a casein. sent3: the fact that the Appenzeller is not a comfit but it is a kind of a Ribhus does not hold. sent4: the Cherokee is a kind of a mignonette if it smells witness. sent5: if the tonsure is both not incredible and a Perm then the Appenzeller is not incredible. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a Perm but insoluble is incorrect. sent7: the Cherokee is not apologetics if it is a casein and it is a kind of a mignonette. sent8: if the Appenzeller is not incredible then that it is a philanthropy and a cassette does not hold. sent9: there exists nothing such that it is non-carunculate thing that does not smell witness. sent10: that the tonsure is a kind of a Perm hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Perm but insoluble is incorrect. sent11: the spherometer is not apologetics. sent12: that the tugboat is unworldly and it is a Ribhus is true if there is something such that it is not a Pickett. sent13: the Cherokee is apologetics if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a comfit and a Ribhus is wrong. sent14: if that something is not carunculate and it does not smell witness is incorrect it is a kind of a mignonette. sent15: if there is something such that it is unworldly and is a Ribhus the fact that the Damascene is not a comfit hold. sent16: if the Cherokee is not a casein then the fact that the Damascene does smell geology is false. sent17: the tugboat does not smell witness. sent18: the tonsure is not incredible. sent19: the fact that that the tugboat is a kind of a patty-pan that smells geology hold is not true if the Damascene does not smells geology. sent20: the fact that that that something is not apologetics and is a mignonette hold is false if it smells geology is right.
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the Cherokee is non-carunculate thing that does not smell witness is not right.; sent14 -> int2: if that the Cherokee is not carunculate and does not smell witness is not correct then it is a mignonette.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Cherokee is a mignonette is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Cherokee is not a casein is wrong.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the Cherokee is a kind of a casein and is a mignonette.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the Cherokee is not apologetics.; sent3 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is not a comfit and is a kind of a Ribhus is not right.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the Cherokee is apologetics.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Cherokee is not a kind of a casein.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the Damascene does not smell geology.; int10 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the outfit is not a casein.
sent20 -> int11: the fact that that the Damascene is both not apologetics and a mignonette does not hold hold if it does smell geology.; sent1 -> int12: if that the Appenzeller is a philanthropy and it is a cassette is not right then it is not a Pickett.; sent6 & sent10 -> int13: the tonsure is a kind of a Perm.; sent18 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the tonsure is not incredible but it is a Perm is not wrong.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the Appenzeller is not incredible.; sent8 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the Appenzeller is a kind of a philanthropy and it is a cassette is not correct.; int12 & int16 -> int17: that the Appenzeller is not a Pickett hold.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is not a Pickett.; int18 & sent12 -> int19: the tugboat is unworldly and it is a kind of a Ribhus.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that it is unworldly and it is a Ribhus.; int20 & sent15 -> int21: the Damascene is not a comfit.;
$hypothesis$ = the tugboat is a kind of a patty-pan and it smells geology. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a Pickett if the fact that it is a philanthropy and it is a cassette is incorrect. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is not apologetics and it is a mignonette is not correct the outfit is not a kind of a casein. sent3: the fact that the Appenzeller is not a comfit but it is a kind of a Ribhus does not hold. sent4: the Cherokee is a kind of a mignonette if it smells witness. sent5: if the tonsure is both not incredible and a Perm then the Appenzeller is not incredible. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a Perm but insoluble is incorrect. sent7: the Cherokee is not apologetics if it is a casein and it is a kind of a mignonette. sent8: if the Appenzeller is not incredible then that it is a philanthropy and a cassette does not hold. sent9: there exists nothing such that it is non-carunculate thing that does not smell witness. sent10: that the tonsure is a kind of a Perm hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Perm but insoluble is incorrect. sent11: the spherometer is not apologetics. sent12: that the tugboat is unworldly and it is a Ribhus is true if there is something such that it is not a Pickett. sent13: the Cherokee is apologetics if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a comfit and a Ribhus is wrong. sent14: if that something is not carunculate and it does not smell witness is incorrect it is a kind of a mignonette. sent15: if there is something such that it is unworldly and is a Ribhus the fact that the Damascene is not a comfit hold. sent16: if the Cherokee is not a casein then the fact that the Damascene does smell geology is false. sent17: the tugboat does not smell witness. sent18: the tonsure is not incredible. sent19: the fact that that the tugboat is a kind of a patty-pan that smells geology hold is not true if the Damascene does not smells geology. sent20: the fact that that that something is not apologetics and is a mignonette hold is false if it smells geology is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the Cherokee is non-carunculate thing that does not smell witness is not right.; sent14 -> int2: if that the Cherokee is not carunculate and does not smell witness is not correct then it is a mignonette.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Cherokee is a mignonette is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Cherokee is not a casein is wrong.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the Cherokee is a kind of a casein and is a mignonette.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the Cherokee is not apologetics.; sent3 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is not a comfit and is a kind of a Ribhus is not right.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the Cherokee is apologetics.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the Cherokee is not a kind of a casein.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the Damascene does not smell geology.; int10 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__