there is something such that the fact that it does not honey Ataturk and it is not contrasty is false.
sent1: the fact that the hope is not essential and is a kind of a ligation does not hold if that it is not dishonorable is correct. sent2: the sporophore is not a kind of a scour. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is not essential and it is a ligation is not right then the FSH is not a duel. sent4: that the sporophore does honey Ataturk and is not contrasty is false if the FSH does not duel. sent5: the hope is not dishonorable. sent6: if there are dishonorable things the hope is not essential. sent7: the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is non-cheap thing that does resettle quail does not hold is true. sent8: that the sporophore honeys Ataturk and is not contrasty does not hold. sent9: there is something such that that it does not honey Ataturk and it is contrasty is false. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of essential a ligation is not right. sent11: that something is not insensitive and is not a crayfish is not correct if it is dishonorable. sent12: if the FSH does not duel then the fact that the sporophore does not honey Ataturk and is contrasty does not hold. sent13: if something is contrasty then the sporophore is a kind of dishonorable a duel. sent14: there is something such that it does not honey Ataturk and is not contrasty. sent15: the hope is not a duel. sent16: if the FSH does not duel then that the sporophore does not honey Ataturk and is not contrasty is not true. sent17: the FSH is not a amylase and resettles gummed if it does not resettle crossbill. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it honeys Ataturk and it is not contrasty is not correct. sent19: something is a kind of inessential a ligation. sent20: if there exists something such that it is not a ligation then the FSH is not a kind of a duel. sent21: the fact that the sporophore does not honey Ataturk but it is contrasty is not right. sent22: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a crayfish that is a kind of a powwow does not hold. sent23: if something is not a terrine then it is contrasty and it does honey Ataturk. sent24: that if the FSH is not a kind of a amylase but it does resettle gummed then the fact that the hope is not a terrine is right is not false.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the hope is not essential but it is a kind of a ligation is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a kind of inessential a ligation is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the FSH does not duel.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the sporophore does not honey Ataturk and is not contrasty hold is not correct.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sporophore is both sensitive and not a crayfish does not hold.
sent11 -> int5: if the sporophore is dishonorable then the fact that it is not insensitive and it is not a crayfish is wrong.; sent23 -> int6: the hope is contrasty thing that honeys Ataturk if it is not a terrine.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it does not honey Ataturk and it is not contrasty is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hope is not essential and is a kind of a ligation does not hold if that it is not dishonorable is correct. sent2: the sporophore is not a kind of a scour. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is not essential and it is a ligation is not right then the FSH is not a duel. sent4: that the sporophore does honey Ataturk and is not contrasty is false if the FSH does not duel. sent5: the hope is not dishonorable. sent6: if there are dishonorable things the hope is not essential. sent7: the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is non-cheap thing that does resettle quail does not hold is true. sent8: that the sporophore honeys Ataturk and is not contrasty does not hold. sent9: there is something such that that it does not honey Ataturk and it is contrasty is false. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of essential a ligation is not right. sent11: that something is not insensitive and is not a crayfish is not correct if it is dishonorable. sent12: if the FSH does not duel then the fact that the sporophore does not honey Ataturk and is contrasty does not hold. sent13: if something is contrasty then the sporophore is a kind of dishonorable a duel. sent14: there is something such that it does not honey Ataturk and is not contrasty. sent15: the hope is not a duel. sent16: if the FSH does not duel then that the sporophore does not honey Ataturk and is not contrasty is not true. sent17: the FSH is not a amylase and resettles gummed if it does not resettle crossbill. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it honeys Ataturk and it is not contrasty is not correct. sent19: something is a kind of inessential a ligation. sent20: if there exists something such that it is not a ligation then the FSH is not a kind of a duel. sent21: the fact that the sporophore does not honey Ataturk but it is contrasty is not right. sent22: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a crayfish that is a kind of a powwow does not hold. sent23: if something is not a terrine then it is contrasty and it does honey Ataturk. sent24: that if the FSH is not a kind of a amylase but it does resettle gummed then the fact that the hope is not a terrine is right is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the hope is not essential but it is a kind of a ligation is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a kind of inessential a ligation is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the FSH does not duel.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the sporophore does not honey Ataturk and is not contrasty hold is not correct.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__