the fact that there is something such that if it is careless that it is not continental and it is altricial is not true does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a cooter then the fact that it is not a pseudohallucination and it is a crutch does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it negates beeper then that it is non-rheologic and it is transatlantic is wrong. sent3: the cutoff is not continental but it is altricial if it is careless. sent4: there is something such that if it is careless it is non-continental thing that is altricial. sent5: there is something such that if it is cryogenic then the fact that it is not a tannery and it is a corker is false. sent6: the fact that the cutoff is not a binomial but it is altricial is not right if it is a dissenter. sent7: there exists something such that if it is unconstitutional that it does not tag gone and is a kind of a heterosexism does not hold. sent8: that the cutoff is both continental and altricial is wrong if it is careless. sent9: there exists something such that if it is transatlantic then the fact that it is not fabian and it does gauge superlative is not right. sent10: there is something such that if it is careless that it is continental and is altricial does not hold. sent11: that something is not continental and is altricial is wrong if it is careless. sent12: the fact that something is not transcultural but it is tonsorial does not hold if it is calligraphic. sent13: there exists something such that if it is weatherly then that it is a kind of non-Kiplingesque thing that does overawe appreciator is false. sent14: there is something such that if it is a colossus that it is not a kind of a Nahuatl and is a reedbird is false. sent15: there is something such that if it hauls then that it is not bacillar but a pinche is not correct. sent16: the fact that something is continental and it is altricial does not hold if it is careless. sent17: there exists something such that if it is calligraphic then that it is not Arminian and it is anacoluthic does not hold. sent18: the fact that the molindone does not gauge Moore but it is a parathion is false if it is continental. sent19: something that is careless is a kind of non-continental thing that is altricial.
sent11 -> int1: if the cutoff is careless the fact that it is both non-continental and altricial is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is careless that it is not continental and it is altricial is not true does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a cooter then the fact that it is not a pseudohallucination and it is a crutch does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it negates beeper then that it is non-rheologic and it is transatlantic is wrong. sent3: the cutoff is not continental but it is altricial if it is careless. sent4: there is something such that if it is careless it is non-continental thing that is altricial. sent5: there is something such that if it is cryogenic then the fact that it is not a tannery and it is a corker is false. sent6: the fact that the cutoff is not a binomial but it is altricial is not right if it is a dissenter. sent7: there exists something such that if it is unconstitutional that it does not tag gone and is a kind of a heterosexism does not hold. sent8: that the cutoff is both continental and altricial is wrong if it is careless. sent9: there exists something such that if it is transatlantic then the fact that it is not fabian and it does gauge superlative is not right. sent10: there is something such that if it is careless that it is continental and is altricial does not hold. sent11: that something is not continental and is altricial is wrong if it is careless. sent12: the fact that something is not transcultural but it is tonsorial does not hold if it is calligraphic. sent13: there exists something such that if it is weatherly then that it is a kind of non-Kiplingesque thing that does overawe appreciator is false. sent14: there is something such that if it is a colossus that it is not a kind of a Nahuatl and is a reedbird is false. sent15: there is something such that if it hauls then that it is not bacillar but a pinche is not correct. sent16: the fact that something is continental and it is altricial does not hold if it is careless. sent17: there exists something such that if it is calligraphic then that it is not Arminian and it is anacoluthic does not hold. sent18: the fact that the molindone does not gauge Moore but it is a parathion is false if it is continental. sent19: something that is careless is a kind of non-continental thing that is altricial. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the cutoff is careless the fact that it is both non-continental and altricial is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__