the accommodation is a kind of a cut.
sent1: if the fact that the meclofenamate is gymnospermous and a compound is wrong the rhododendron is not a Contopus. sent2: there is something such that it does mortice nephrotoxin and it is a ramble. sent3: the accommodation is uncut if the rhododendron is a Franco that does not uncut. sent4: the meclofenamate is not a Franco if the fact that it forecasts engraver and is not capitular is not right. sent5: that the meclofenamate forecasts engraver but it is not capitular does not hold. sent6: the accommodation does mortice nephrotoxin if there exists something such that the fact that it disengages and/or compensates accommodation is false. sent7: the fact that the fact that something is gymnospermous and compounds is not incorrect is not right if it is not a Franco. sent8: something does ramble if it does mortice nephrotoxin. sent9: the bradawl does not compensate accommodation if something does mortice nephrotoxin and is a kind of a ramble. sent10: if the meclofenamate is not a kind of a compound the rhododendron is not a Contopus. sent11: if something rambles it does cut. sent12: if something is not a Contopus the fact that it does disengage or compensates accommodation or both does not hold.
sent7 -> int1: that the meclofenamate is gymnospermous and it is a compound does not hold if it is not a Franco.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the meclofenamate is not a Franco.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the meclofenamate is gymnospermous and it is a kind of a compound is false.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the rhododendron is not a Contopus is right.; sent12 -> int5: if the rhododendron is not a Contopus the fact that it does disengage or compensates accommodation or both is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that either the rhododendron disengages or it does compensate accommodation or both is not incorrect does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it does disengage and/or it does compensate accommodation is not true.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the accommodation mortices nephrotoxin.; sent8 -> int9: the accommodation does ramble if it mortices nephrotoxin.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the accommodation is a ramble.; sent11 -> int11: the accommodation is a cut if it is a ramble.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the accommodation is not cut hold.
sent2 & sent9 -> int12: the bradawl does not compensate accommodation.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does not compensate accommodation.;
$hypothesis$ = the accommodation is a kind of a cut. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the meclofenamate is gymnospermous and a compound is wrong the rhododendron is not a Contopus. sent2: there is something such that it does mortice nephrotoxin and it is a ramble. sent3: the accommodation is uncut if the rhododendron is a Franco that does not uncut. sent4: the meclofenamate is not a Franco if the fact that it forecasts engraver and is not capitular is not right. sent5: that the meclofenamate forecasts engraver but it is not capitular does not hold. sent6: the accommodation does mortice nephrotoxin if there exists something such that the fact that it disengages and/or compensates accommodation is false. sent7: the fact that the fact that something is gymnospermous and compounds is not incorrect is not right if it is not a Franco. sent8: something does ramble if it does mortice nephrotoxin. sent9: the bradawl does not compensate accommodation if something does mortice nephrotoxin and is a kind of a ramble. sent10: if the meclofenamate is not a kind of a compound the rhododendron is not a Contopus. sent11: if something rambles it does cut. sent12: if something is not a Contopus the fact that it does disengage or compensates accommodation or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the meclofenamate is gymnospermous and it is a compound does not hold if it is not a Franco.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the meclofenamate is not a Franco.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the meclofenamate is gymnospermous and it is a kind of a compound is false.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the rhododendron is not a Contopus is right.; sent12 -> int5: if the rhododendron is not a Contopus the fact that it does disengage or compensates accommodation or both is not true.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that either the rhododendron disengages or it does compensate accommodation or both is not incorrect does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it does disengage and/or it does compensate accommodation is not true.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the accommodation mortices nephrotoxin.; sent8 -> int9: the accommodation does ramble if it mortices nephrotoxin.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the accommodation is a ramble.; sent11 -> int11: the accommodation is a cut if it is a ramble.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__