the theophylline is a anthropophagy.
sent1: the ace does dry if that the grimoire is a kind of a Amygdalus or it is not a redraft or both is wrong. sent2: if the theophylline is not a redraft it is dried and a anthropophagy. sent3: if the grimoire is non-dried that the genius is not a suggestibility and does not subject thundershower is false. sent4: the indexer is a borax and/or does frivol if there is something such that it is not non-Hasidic. sent5: the fact that everything is not a suggestibility and it does not subject thundershower is correct. sent6: the genius is not a kind of a suggestibility. sent7: that the genius deprives crowbait is not wrong if the indexer does frivol. sent8: the genius does deprive crowbait if the indexer is a borax. sent9: the fact that the theophylline is not a kind of a anthropophagy hold if it does not subject solvability. sent10: if something deprives crowbait then it is a anthropophagy. sent11: if the grimoire does not subject solvability and is not a Amygdalus the theophylline is not a redraft. sent12: the indexer is a redraft if the grimoire is not non-dried. sent13: if that that the theophylline is not a Amygdalus but it is a kind of a redraft hold is false it does not subject solvability. sent14: the theophylline is gutsy and is Hasidic. sent15: if the indexer is a redraft then the fact that the theophylline is not a Amygdalus and is a redraft is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grimoire is not dried.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the genius is not a suggestibility and it does not subject thundershower does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: the genius is not a suggestibility and does not subject thundershower.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the grimoire is a kind of a dried.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the indexer is a kind of a redraft is not wrong.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the fact that the theophylline is not a Amygdalus and is a kind of a redraft is not true.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the theophylline does not subject solvability is not wrong.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the theophylline is a anthropophagy.
$hypothesis$ = the theophylline is a anthropophagy. ; $context$ = sent1: the ace does dry if that the grimoire is a kind of a Amygdalus or it is not a redraft or both is wrong. sent2: if the theophylline is not a redraft it is dried and a anthropophagy. sent3: if the grimoire is non-dried that the genius is not a suggestibility and does not subject thundershower is false. sent4: the indexer is a borax and/or does frivol if there is something such that it is not non-Hasidic. sent5: the fact that everything is not a suggestibility and it does not subject thundershower is correct. sent6: the genius is not a kind of a suggestibility. sent7: that the genius deprives crowbait is not wrong if the indexer does frivol. sent8: the genius does deprive crowbait if the indexer is a borax. sent9: the fact that the theophylline is not a kind of a anthropophagy hold if it does not subject solvability. sent10: if something deprives crowbait then it is a anthropophagy. sent11: if the grimoire does not subject solvability and is not a Amygdalus the theophylline is not a redraft. sent12: the indexer is a redraft if the grimoire is not non-dried. sent13: if that that the theophylline is not a Amygdalus but it is a kind of a redraft hold is false it does not subject solvability. sent14: the theophylline is gutsy and is Hasidic. sent15: if the indexer is a redraft then the fact that the theophylline is not a Amygdalus and is a redraft is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grimoire is not dried.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the genius is not a suggestibility and it does not subject thundershower does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: the genius is not a suggestibility and does not subject thundershower.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the grimoire is a kind of a dried.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the fact that the indexer is a kind of a redraft is not wrong.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the fact that the theophylline is not a Amygdalus and is a kind of a redraft is not true.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the theophylline does not subject solvability is not wrong.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__