both the strengthening and the purifying Teflon occurs.
sent1: if that the copout does not occur and the Ruritanian happens does not hold that the teleologicalness does not occur hold. sent2: the purifying Sonchus happens if the fact that the gallop does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the scourging option does not occur and the unimpressionableness occurs if the Ruritanian does not occur. sent4: the stopping does not occur if the attitude does not occur. sent5: the fact that the somatosensoriness happens hold if the fact that the non-hatefulness and the vaulting allure occurs is not true. sent6: if the steeplechase occurs then the expelling does not occur. sent7: the purifying save does not occur. sent8: that the scourging ergonovine occurs and the purifying censure happens does not hold. sent9: either the steeplechase happens or the canvassing happens or both if the fact that the transfiguration does not occur is not false. sent10: that the fact that the purifying Teflon happens is not wrong if the fact that both the non-Ruritanianness and the copout occurs is wrong is not wrong. sent11: the somatosensoriness happens. sent12: the episiotomy does not occur. sent13: the expelling does not occur if the canvassing occurs. sent14: if the elaboration does not occur the Glaswegian or the arson or both happens. sent15: the vaulting francium happens. sent16: the galloping does not occur. sent17: if the swiz does not occur then the irrational occurs. sent18: the accipitrineness and the strengthening happens if the expelling does not occur. sent19: the transfiguration does not occur. sent20: the nonarborealness brings about that the purifying Tanakh does not occur. sent21: if not the scourging option but the unimpressionableness happens the forcing koruna does not occur. sent22: that the fact that the coitalness occurs and the freezing happens does not hold is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the non-Ruritanianness and the copout happens.; assump1 -> int1: the Ruritanian does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the scourging option does not occur but the unimpressionableness occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the forcing koruna does not occur.; sent2 & sent16 -> int4: the purifying Sonchus occurs.; sent9 & sent19 -> int5: the steeplechase occurs and/or the canvassing occurs.; int5 & sent6 & sent13 -> int6: that the expelling does not occur is not false.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: both the accipitrineness and the strengthening occurs.; int7 -> int8: the strengthening occurs.;
the teleologicalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = both the strengthening and the purifying Teflon occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the copout does not occur and the Ruritanian happens does not hold that the teleologicalness does not occur hold. sent2: the purifying Sonchus happens if the fact that the gallop does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the scourging option does not occur and the unimpressionableness occurs if the Ruritanian does not occur. sent4: the stopping does not occur if the attitude does not occur. sent5: the fact that the somatosensoriness happens hold if the fact that the non-hatefulness and the vaulting allure occurs is not true. sent6: if the steeplechase occurs then the expelling does not occur. sent7: the purifying save does not occur. sent8: that the scourging ergonovine occurs and the purifying censure happens does not hold. sent9: either the steeplechase happens or the canvassing happens or both if the fact that the transfiguration does not occur is not false. sent10: that the fact that the purifying Teflon happens is not wrong if the fact that both the non-Ruritanianness and the copout occurs is wrong is not wrong. sent11: the somatosensoriness happens. sent12: the episiotomy does not occur. sent13: the expelling does not occur if the canvassing occurs. sent14: if the elaboration does not occur the Glaswegian or the arson or both happens. sent15: the vaulting francium happens. sent16: the galloping does not occur. sent17: if the swiz does not occur then the irrational occurs. sent18: the accipitrineness and the strengthening happens if the expelling does not occur. sent19: the transfiguration does not occur. sent20: the nonarborealness brings about that the purifying Tanakh does not occur. sent21: if not the scourging option but the unimpressionableness happens the forcing koruna does not occur. sent22: that the fact that the coitalness occurs and the freezing happens does not hold is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the non-Ruritanianness and the copout happens.; assump1 -> int1: the Ruritanian does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the scourging option does not occur but the unimpressionableness occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the forcing koruna does not occur.; sent2 & sent16 -> int4: the purifying Sonchus occurs.; sent9 & sent19 -> int5: the steeplechase occurs and/or the canvassing occurs.; int5 & sent6 & sent13 -> int6: that the expelling does not occur is not false.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: both the accipitrineness and the strengthening occurs.; int7 -> int8: the strengthening occurs.; __UNKNOWN__