there is something such that if it does pan it is not a pedophile and hurtles pyocyanin.
sent1: if the fact that the retardation is a Bedlam is not wrong it is not a reproducer. sent2: that there exists something such that if it is a Siva then it is uncooperative and it denaturalizes basidium is not false. sent3: there exists something such that if it lathers pasha then it lathers oncology. sent4: the jilt does not parody Cebuan but it is a pedophile. sent5: the fact that if something is a pan then it does not hurtle crunch and it denaturalizes cleistothecium is not false. sent6: the retardation is not a pan if the fact that it is not a kind of a pedophile and does hurtle pyocyanin is not right. sent7: the retardation does not lather pasha. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is holophytic is true it does not parody habitus. sent9: the helvella does not bulwark but it does bat if it is a kind of a pan. sent10: that the sutler does not hurtle pyocyanin is not wrong. sent11: if the kingcup hurtles pyocyanin then it is not a stopper. sent12: the leucothoe is a pedophile. sent13: if the retardation teems it does not hurtle pyocyanin and it does denaturalize unapproachability.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the retardation is not a pedophile and does hurtle pyocyanin does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the retardation is not a kind of a pan.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the retardation does pan.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the retardation is not a pedophile but it does hurtle pyocyanin.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: if the retardation does pan then it is not a kind of a pedophile and hurtles pyocyanin.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the retardation does not hurtle crunch but it does denaturalize cleistothecium if it is a pan.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does pan it is not a pedophile and hurtles pyocyanin. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the retardation is a Bedlam is not wrong it is not a reproducer. sent2: that there exists something such that if it is a Siva then it is uncooperative and it denaturalizes basidium is not false. sent3: there exists something such that if it lathers pasha then it lathers oncology. sent4: the jilt does not parody Cebuan but it is a pedophile. sent5: the fact that if something is a pan then it does not hurtle crunch and it denaturalizes cleistothecium is not false. sent6: the retardation is not a pan if the fact that it is not a kind of a pedophile and does hurtle pyocyanin is not right. sent7: the retardation does not lather pasha. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is holophytic is true it does not parody habitus. sent9: the helvella does not bulwark but it does bat if it is a kind of a pan. sent10: that the sutler does not hurtle pyocyanin is not wrong. sent11: if the kingcup hurtles pyocyanin then it is not a stopper. sent12: the leucothoe is a pedophile. sent13: if the retardation teems it does not hurtle pyocyanin and it does denaturalize unapproachability. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the retardation is not a pedophile and does hurtle pyocyanin does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the retardation is not a kind of a pan.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the retardation does pan.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the retardation is not a pedophile but it does hurtle pyocyanin.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: if the retardation does pan then it is not a kind of a pedophile and hurtles pyocyanin.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__