the fact that if the chicory does not wobble hemorrhoid then the freak is a ski-plane but it does not daydream is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the chicory does not cloud Lubitsch is right the stopover is azonal and does not cloud Lubitsch. sent2: everything clouds Lubitsch and does not ferret vegetarian. sent3: the stopover is not Edwardian. sent4: the stopover does not daydream if the fact that the chicory does not cloud mortgaged and it does not wobble hemorrhoid is true. sent5: the freak is a ski-plane but it does not daydream if the stopover does not daydream. sent6: something that does cloud mortgaged is azonal. sent7: something clouds Lubitsch if it is a kind of a ski-plane. sent8: if the chicory does cloud Lubitsch and is a ski-plane then it does not daydream. sent9: if something clouds Lubitsch but it does not ferret vegetarian it is not azonal. sent10: the stopover is not azonal.
sent6 -> int1: if the chicory clouds mortgaged that it is azonal hold.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the chicory does cloud mortgaged.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the chicory is azonal is true.; sent9 -> int3: the chicory is not azonal if it clouds Lubitsch and does not ferret vegetarian.; sent2 -> int4: the chicory clouds Lubitsch but it does not ferret vegetarian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the chicory is not azonal.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the chicory does not cloud mortgaged.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chicory does not wobble hemorrhoid.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: the chicory does not cloud mortgaged and does not wobble hemorrhoid.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the stopover does not daydream.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the freak is a ski-plane but it does not daydream.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the chicory does not wobble hemorrhoid then the freak is a ski-plane but it does not daydream is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the chicory does not cloud Lubitsch is right the stopover is azonal and does not cloud Lubitsch. sent2: everything clouds Lubitsch and does not ferret vegetarian. sent3: the stopover is not Edwardian. sent4: the stopover does not daydream if the fact that the chicory does not cloud mortgaged and it does not wobble hemorrhoid is true. sent5: the freak is a ski-plane but it does not daydream if the stopover does not daydream. sent6: something that does cloud mortgaged is azonal. sent7: something clouds Lubitsch if it is a kind of a ski-plane. sent8: if the chicory does cloud Lubitsch and is a ski-plane then it does not daydream. sent9: if something clouds Lubitsch but it does not ferret vegetarian it is not azonal. sent10: the stopover is not azonal. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the chicory clouds mortgaged that it is azonal hold.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the chicory does cloud mortgaged.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the chicory is azonal is true.; sent9 -> int3: the chicory is not azonal if it clouds Lubitsch and does not ferret vegetarian.; sent2 -> int4: the chicory clouds Lubitsch but it does not ferret vegetarian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the chicory is not azonal.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: the chicory does not cloud mortgaged.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chicory does not wobble hemorrhoid.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: the chicory does not cloud mortgaged and does not wobble hemorrhoid.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the stopover does not daydream.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the freak is a ski-plane but it does not daydream.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__