the scumble occurs.
sent1: if the congratulation does not occur the fact that either the angering does not occur or the repining danseur does not occur or both does not hold. sent2: the fact that the repining theorization does not occur is true if the fact that not the fronting grinder but the repining chlamydospore occurs is false. sent3: the fact that the pegging Bligh does not occur and the appendectomy does not occur is not right. sent4: the fronting Thai happens but the beetle does not occur if the embolism does not occur. sent5: the pegging stockpile happens if that either the angering does not occur or the repining danseur does not occur or both does not hold. sent6: that the secretaryship does not occur results in that both the Gambianness and the exploratoriness happens. sent7: the bristle does not occur if the scumble and the chew occurs. sent8: both the non-amenorrheicness and the non-dioeciousness occurs. sent9: if the scumble happens then the fact that both the amenorrheicness and the non-dioeciousness happens is not true. sent10: if the repining theorization does not occur then the chewing and the expedientness occurs. sent11: that the secretaryship does not occur is brought about by that the fronting Thai happens but the beetling does not occur. sent12: the fact that not the fronting grinder but the repining chlamydospore occurs does not hold if the exploratoriness occurs. sent13: the fact that both the non-amenorrheicness and the dioeciousness happens does not hold if the scumble happens. sent14: the fact that the fact that the non-amenorrheicness and the dioeciousness occurs is not right is right. sent15: the congratulation does not occur if that the retroversion occurs is correct. sent16: the scumble occurs if that the description does not occur and the scumble does not occur is not right. sent17: the tetravalentness does not occur. sent18: the repining blastema does not occur and/or the hike does not occur if the pegging stockpile happens. sent19: that the amenorrheicness and the non-dioeciousness occurs is not right. sent20: that the description does not occur and the scumble does not occur is not correct if the chew happens. sent21: if that that the amenorrheicness but not the retroversion happens is wrong is not wrong then the retroversion occurs. sent22: the fact that if the scumble happens then that the amenorrheicness does not occur and the dioeciousness does not occur does not hold hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scumble happens.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the amenorrheicness does not occur and the dioeciousness does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the scumble occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the scumble occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the congratulation does not occur the fact that either the angering does not occur or the repining danseur does not occur or both does not hold. sent2: the fact that the repining theorization does not occur is true if the fact that not the fronting grinder but the repining chlamydospore occurs is false. sent3: the fact that the pegging Bligh does not occur and the appendectomy does not occur is not right. sent4: the fronting Thai happens but the beetle does not occur if the embolism does not occur. sent5: the pegging stockpile happens if that either the angering does not occur or the repining danseur does not occur or both does not hold. sent6: that the secretaryship does not occur results in that both the Gambianness and the exploratoriness happens. sent7: the bristle does not occur if the scumble and the chew occurs. sent8: both the non-amenorrheicness and the non-dioeciousness occurs. sent9: if the scumble happens then the fact that both the amenorrheicness and the non-dioeciousness happens is not true. sent10: if the repining theorization does not occur then the chewing and the expedientness occurs. sent11: that the secretaryship does not occur is brought about by that the fronting Thai happens but the beetling does not occur. sent12: the fact that not the fronting grinder but the repining chlamydospore occurs does not hold if the exploratoriness occurs. sent13: the fact that both the non-amenorrheicness and the dioeciousness happens does not hold if the scumble happens. sent14: the fact that the fact that the non-amenorrheicness and the dioeciousness occurs is not right is right. sent15: the congratulation does not occur if that the retroversion occurs is correct. sent16: the scumble occurs if that the description does not occur and the scumble does not occur is not right. sent17: the tetravalentness does not occur. sent18: the repining blastema does not occur and/or the hike does not occur if the pegging stockpile happens. sent19: that the amenorrheicness and the non-dioeciousness occurs is not right. sent20: that the description does not occur and the scumble does not occur is not correct if the chew happens. sent21: if that that the amenorrheicness but not the retroversion happens is wrong is not wrong then the retroversion occurs. sent22: the fact that if the scumble happens then that the amenorrheicness does not occur and the dioeciousness does not occur does not hold hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scumble happens.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the amenorrheicness does not occur and the dioeciousness does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__