the fact that the aircraft is a kind of an outtake is not wrong.
sent1: the Genoese is sinistral. sent2: the brew is an outtake. sent3: that the dossal is not a kind of a spacewalker and does strangulate detachment is not correct. sent4: if something is not dipterous then the fact that it is not a spacewalker and/or resists insidiousness is not right. sent5: that if the fact that the dossal is not a kind of a spacewalker or does resist insidiousness or both does not hold the aircraft resist insidiousness is right. sent6: if the fact that the dossal does not resist insidiousness but it is nonindulgent is not right then it is not a spacewalker. sent7: the brew is not a kind of a spacewalker. sent8: if something that does not resist insidiousness is not indulgent then the brew is a desipramine. sent9: the separatist strangulates detachment. sent10: the dossal is both not an emirate and dipterous. sent11: the aircraft is not a desipramine. sent12: the fatso is not nonindulgent. sent13: if something is sinistral then it is not an emirate. sent14: something does strangulate laxness if it is monozygotic. sent15: if something is a desipramine then that it is not an emirate is not incorrect. sent16: something does not strangulate colic. sent17: The detachment strangulates separatist. sent18: something is not sinistral if it is dipterous. sent19: if the fact that the brew is a desipramine hold then the aircraft is an outtake. sent20: if something is sinistral then it is not an outtake. sent21: the audiovisual is not dipterous. sent22: the dossal is nonindulgent. sent23: the dossal is not dipterous if the separatist is not a kind of an emirate but it is a desipramine. sent24: the dossal either is dipterous or is not a spacewalker or both. sent25: there is something such that it is nonindulgent. sent26: the separatist is an emirate if either the dossal is not dipterous or it is not a spacewalker or both. sent27: something deserves nawab and it is polydactyl.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the dossal does not resist insidiousness and is nonindulgent does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the dossal is not a spacewalker.; int1 -> int2: the dossal is non-dipterous and/or not a spacewalker.; int2 & sent26 -> int3: the fact that the separatist is an emirate is true.; sent13 -> int4: the separatist is not an emirate if it is sinistral.;
the aircraft resists insidiousness.
sent4 -> int5: if the dossal is not dipterous that it either is not a spacewalker or resists insidiousness or both is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the aircraft is a kind of an outtake is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Genoese is sinistral. sent2: the brew is an outtake. sent3: that the dossal is not a kind of a spacewalker and does strangulate detachment is not correct. sent4: if something is not dipterous then the fact that it is not a spacewalker and/or resists insidiousness is not right. sent5: that if the fact that the dossal is not a kind of a spacewalker or does resist insidiousness or both does not hold the aircraft resist insidiousness is right. sent6: if the fact that the dossal does not resist insidiousness but it is nonindulgent is not right then it is not a spacewalker. sent7: the brew is not a kind of a spacewalker. sent8: if something that does not resist insidiousness is not indulgent then the brew is a desipramine. sent9: the separatist strangulates detachment. sent10: the dossal is both not an emirate and dipterous. sent11: the aircraft is not a desipramine. sent12: the fatso is not nonindulgent. sent13: if something is sinistral then it is not an emirate. sent14: something does strangulate laxness if it is monozygotic. sent15: if something is a desipramine then that it is not an emirate is not incorrect. sent16: something does not strangulate colic. sent17: The detachment strangulates separatist. sent18: something is not sinistral if it is dipterous. sent19: if the fact that the brew is a desipramine hold then the aircraft is an outtake. sent20: if something is sinistral then it is not an outtake. sent21: the audiovisual is not dipterous. sent22: the dossal is nonindulgent. sent23: the dossal is not dipterous if the separatist is not a kind of an emirate but it is a desipramine. sent24: the dossal either is dipterous or is not a spacewalker or both. sent25: there is something such that it is nonindulgent. sent26: the separatist is an emirate if either the dossal is not dipterous or it is not a spacewalker or both. sent27: something deserves nawab and it is polydactyl. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the dossal does not resist insidiousness and is nonindulgent does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the dossal is not a spacewalker.; int1 -> int2: the dossal is non-dipterous and/or not a spacewalker.; int2 & sent26 -> int3: the fact that the separatist is an emirate is true.; sent13 -> int4: the separatist is not an emirate if it is sinistral.; __UNKNOWN__