the fact that the canafistola does not furlough violator if the fact that the canafistola is a lexicology hold does not hold.
sent1: if the canafistola is a kind of a lexicology then it furloughs inefficiency. sent2: something debuts Rockingham if it is a Union. sent3: if the fact that either something is not a stall or it is a kind of a Union or both is incorrect it unpicks Euryale. sent4: the glycoprotein does furlough inefficiency and is a lexicology if there exists something such that it debuts Rockingham. sent5: the pyrostat is a kind of a friedcake if it is eradicable. sent6: the ablactation does unpick Euryale if that the native does furlough hydroxymethyl but it does not unpick Euryale is incorrect. sent7: if the canafistola does not unpick Euryale then it is not a flammability. sent8: if something does furlough inefficiency the fact that it does not debut Rockingham is not false. sent9: the canafistola is not a kind of a Union. sent10: if the canafistola is a lexicology it furloughs violator. sent11: the canafistola furloughs violator if it unpicks Euryale. sent12: the fugu is not triclinic if it does furlough inefficiency. sent13: if something does unpick Euryale then it does not furlough violator. sent14: that the canafistola is not a Dimash or it is indispensable or both is false. sent15: if the ablactation unpicks Euryale then the canafistola is a stall. sent16: that something is not a stall and/or is Union does not hold if it does not debut Rockingham.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canafistola is a lexicology.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the canafistola furloughs inefficiency.; sent8 -> int2: if the canafistola does furlough inefficiency then it does not debut Rockingham.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the canafistola does not debut Rockingham.; sent16 -> int4: if the canafistola does not debut Rockingham then the fact that it is not a stall or is Union or both is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that either the canafistola is not a kind of a stall or it is a Union or both is not right.; sent3 -> int6: if the fact that the canafistola is not a kind of a stall and/or it is a kind of a Union is not correct then it does unpick Euryale.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the canafistola unpicks Euryale.; sent13 -> int8: the canafistola does not furlough violator if the fact that it unpicks Euryale is not wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the canafistola does not furlough violator.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the glycoprotein is a kind of a lexicology.
sent2 -> int10: if the canafistola is a Union it debuts Rockingham.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the canafistola does not furlough violator if the fact that the canafistola is a lexicology hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the canafistola is a kind of a lexicology then it furloughs inefficiency. sent2: something debuts Rockingham if it is a Union. sent3: if the fact that either something is not a stall or it is a kind of a Union or both is incorrect it unpicks Euryale. sent4: the glycoprotein does furlough inefficiency and is a lexicology if there exists something such that it debuts Rockingham. sent5: the pyrostat is a kind of a friedcake if it is eradicable. sent6: the ablactation does unpick Euryale if that the native does furlough hydroxymethyl but it does not unpick Euryale is incorrect. sent7: if the canafistola does not unpick Euryale then it is not a flammability. sent8: if something does furlough inefficiency the fact that it does not debut Rockingham is not false. sent9: the canafistola is not a kind of a Union. sent10: if the canafistola is a lexicology it furloughs violator. sent11: the canafistola furloughs violator if it unpicks Euryale. sent12: the fugu is not triclinic if it does furlough inefficiency. sent13: if something does unpick Euryale then it does not furlough violator. sent14: that the canafistola is not a Dimash or it is indispensable or both is false. sent15: if the ablactation unpicks Euryale then the canafistola is a stall. sent16: that something is not a stall and/or is Union does not hold if it does not debut Rockingham. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canafistola is a lexicology.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the canafistola furloughs inefficiency.; sent8 -> int2: if the canafistola does furlough inefficiency then it does not debut Rockingham.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the canafistola does not debut Rockingham.; sent16 -> int4: if the canafistola does not debut Rockingham then the fact that it is not a stall or is Union or both is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that either the canafistola is not a kind of a stall or it is a Union or both is not right.; sent3 -> int6: if the fact that the canafistola is not a kind of a stall and/or it is a kind of a Union is not correct then it does unpick Euryale.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the canafistola unpicks Euryale.; sent13 -> int8: the canafistola does not furlough violator if the fact that it unpicks Euryale is not wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the canafistola does not furlough violator.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__