that the demanding does not occur is not wrong.
sent1: if the tutorial occurs the tie happens. sent2: the non-tutorialness is prevented by that not the encircling but the intruding curiosa happens. sent3: that the gardening happens and the cribbage happens is brought about by that the reinforcing disability does not occur. sent4: the fact that if the intruding bird occurs the fact that the reinforcing disability occurs but the concordance does not occur is not true is true. sent5: the racialness occurs. sent6: that the gardening does not occur is caused by that the depiction does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the encircling does not occur and the intruding curiosa happens does not hold then the demand happens. sent8: the intruding bird occurs. sent9: the fact that the reinforcing mannered does not occur if the fact that the gardening does not occur and/or the depiction occurs does not hold is not wrong. sent10: the depiction is prevented by either that the tying happens or the reinforcing mannered or both. sent11: the reinforcing disability does not occur if the fact that the reinforcing disability but not the concordance happens is not true. sent12: the fact that the fact that the fact that the targeting but not the vacationing happens is not wrong is incorrect if the tie does not occur is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the encircling but the intruding curiosa occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the tutorialness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the tie occurs.; int2 -> int3: the tying and/or the reinforcing mannered occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the depiction does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the gardening does not occur.; sent4 & sent8 -> int6: that the reinforcing disability happens and the concordance does not occur is not right.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: that the reinforcing disability does not occur is not false.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the gardening and the cribbage happens.; int8 -> int9: the gardening occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: that the encircling does not occur but the intruding curiosa happens does not hold.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the targeting occurs and the vacationing does not occur is not right.
$hypothesis$ = that the demanding does not occur is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tutorial occurs the tie happens. sent2: the non-tutorialness is prevented by that not the encircling but the intruding curiosa happens. sent3: that the gardening happens and the cribbage happens is brought about by that the reinforcing disability does not occur. sent4: the fact that if the intruding bird occurs the fact that the reinforcing disability occurs but the concordance does not occur is not true is true. sent5: the racialness occurs. sent6: that the gardening does not occur is caused by that the depiction does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the encircling does not occur and the intruding curiosa happens does not hold then the demand happens. sent8: the intruding bird occurs. sent9: the fact that the reinforcing mannered does not occur if the fact that the gardening does not occur and/or the depiction occurs does not hold is not wrong. sent10: the depiction is prevented by either that the tying happens or the reinforcing mannered or both. sent11: the reinforcing disability does not occur if the fact that the reinforcing disability but not the concordance happens is not true. sent12: the fact that the fact that the fact that the targeting but not the vacationing happens is not wrong is incorrect if the tie does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the encircling but the intruding curiosa occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the tutorialness happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the tie occurs.; int2 -> int3: the tying and/or the reinforcing mannered occurs.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the depiction does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the gardening does not occur.; sent4 & sent8 -> int6: that the reinforcing disability happens and the concordance does not occur is not right.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: that the reinforcing disability does not occur is not false.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the gardening and the cribbage happens.; int8 -> int9: the gardening occurs.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: that the encircling does not occur but the intruding curiosa happens does not hold.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__