the eelblenny does lurch adder but it is not a kind of a goatsucker.
sent1: if the food does not lurch ruminant or it is a bryophyte or both then the orderly does not lurch ruminant. sent2: if that something does lurch Kachin and/or it does carol NC is not true that it does not carol anomaly is not incorrect. sent3: if the food is not bacteriological then the pruning does lurch ruminant. sent4: the fact that the eelblenny does not traverse hold. sent5: that the pruning does lurch ruminant and is not a Sedna is not right if the fact that the food does not cope Cordylus is not incorrect. sent6: that the food does lurch ruminant but it is not a bryophyte is not right if the pruning is not bacteriological. sent7: the poet is not effective. sent8: the Service does not efface if something that does not cope Cordylus lurches ruminant. sent9: the fact that if the fact that the food is bacteriological or the goatsucker or both does not hold then the food is not a Sedna is correct. sent10: the pruning lurches adder. sent11: the eelblenny does not lurch ruminant. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is not agricultural is not false then the fact that either the food is a kind of a bryophyte or it is not a kind of a Sedna or both is false. sent13: something is not a goatsucker. sent14: there exists something such that it is a goatsucker. sent15: the fact that the dandy does not efface hold. sent16: if something is not agricultural then it lurches adder and is not a goatsucker. sent17: the ADPS is not shrubby. sent18: if the pruning does lurch ruminant the poet does not cope Cordylus and lurch ruminant. sent19: something does not execute. sent20: if the fact that something either is a bryophyte or is not a Sedna or both is false then it is not bacteriological. sent21: the fact that the fact that the poet is a Sedna and it does cope Cordylus is not false is not correct. sent22: the fact that the food does efface and is a bryophyte is not correct. sent23: there is something such that it is not agricultural. sent24: that the eelblenny lurches adder and is not a goatsucker is not correct if the Service does not efface. sent25: there exists something such that it does not lurch ruminant. sent26: the poet is not a bryophyte.
sent23 & sent12 -> int1: that the food is a bryophyte and/or it is not a Sedna is not true.; sent20 -> int2: the fact that the food is not bacteriological is not incorrect if that that it is a kind of a bryophyte and/or it is not a Sedna hold does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the food is not bacteriological.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the pruning does lurch ruminant.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the poet does not cope Cordylus and lurches ruminant.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not cope Cordylus and it lurches ruminant.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Service does not efface.; int7 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the orderly does not lurch ruminant.
$hypothesis$ = the eelblenny does lurch adder but it is not a kind of a goatsucker. ; $context$ = sent1: if the food does not lurch ruminant or it is a bryophyte or both then the orderly does not lurch ruminant. sent2: if that something does lurch Kachin and/or it does carol NC is not true that it does not carol anomaly is not incorrect. sent3: if the food is not bacteriological then the pruning does lurch ruminant. sent4: the fact that the eelblenny does not traverse hold. sent5: that the pruning does lurch ruminant and is not a Sedna is not right if the fact that the food does not cope Cordylus is not incorrect. sent6: that the food does lurch ruminant but it is not a bryophyte is not right if the pruning is not bacteriological. sent7: the poet is not effective. sent8: the Service does not efface if something that does not cope Cordylus lurches ruminant. sent9: the fact that if the fact that the food is bacteriological or the goatsucker or both does not hold then the food is not a Sedna is correct. sent10: the pruning lurches adder. sent11: the eelblenny does not lurch ruminant. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is not agricultural is not false then the fact that either the food is a kind of a bryophyte or it is not a kind of a Sedna or both is false. sent13: something is not a goatsucker. sent14: there exists something such that it is a goatsucker. sent15: the fact that the dandy does not efface hold. sent16: if something is not agricultural then it lurches adder and is not a goatsucker. sent17: the ADPS is not shrubby. sent18: if the pruning does lurch ruminant the poet does not cope Cordylus and lurch ruminant. sent19: something does not execute. sent20: if the fact that something either is a bryophyte or is not a Sedna or both is false then it is not bacteriological. sent21: the fact that the fact that the poet is a Sedna and it does cope Cordylus is not false is not correct. sent22: the fact that the food does efface and is a bryophyte is not correct. sent23: there is something such that it is not agricultural. sent24: that the eelblenny lurches adder and is not a goatsucker is not correct if the Service does not efface. sent25: there exists something such that it does not lurch ruminant. sent26: the poet is not a bryophyte. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent12 -> int1: that the food is a bryophyte and/or it is not a Sedna is not true.; sent20 -> int2: the fact that the food is not bacteriological is not incorrect if that that it is a kind of a bryophyte and/or it is not a Sedna hold does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the food is not bacteriological.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the pruning does lurch ruminant.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the poet does not cope Cordylus and lurches ruminant.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not cope Cordylus and it lurches ruminant.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Service does not efface.; int7 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__