the Spartanness occurs.
sent1: that the allotropicness happens and the scratch does not occur is not correct if the ascomycetousness does not occur. sent2: the preying Beckley happens. sent3: that both the corseting graphologist and the Jurassicness occurs is not correct. sent4: the fact that the mediatedness occurs is correct. sent5: the fact that the ratcheting peplum occurs is not wrong if the intensifying miserliness occurs. sent6: the ascomycetousness does not occur if that both the non-stereoscopicness and the radiotelephonicness happens does not hold. sent7: that the Spartan does not occur and the crossfire occurs is brought about by that the wobble does not occur. sent8: if the associativeness happens then the nonjudgmentalness happens. sent9: that the tetrametricness occurs and the harmonicness happens results in that the investigation does not occur. sent10: the wobble does not occur and the boricness does not occur if the bestness happens. sent11: if the corseting graphologist happens the intensifying miserliness does not occur. sent12: if the dissociation does not occur the best and the intensifying Gabonese occurs. sent13: the intensifying miserliness does not occur if the fact that not the corseting graphologist but the Jurassic occurs is not correct. sent14: if not the corseting graphologist but the Jurassicness occurs then the mediating does not occur. sent15: that the Platonisticness happens is brought about by that the nonjudgmentalness happens. sent16: the corseting graphologist does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the allotropicness but not the scratch occurs does not hold then the fact that the dissociation does not occur hold. sent18: the fact that the mediatedness does not occur is not incorrect if both the corseting graphologist and the Jurassicness occurs. sent19: that both the non-stereoscopicness and the radiotelephonicness happens does not hold if the Platonisticness occurs. sent20: the Spartanness does not occur if the intensifying miserliness happens. sent21: the Spartanness is triggered by that the intensifying miserliness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the corseting graphologist but the Jurassicness happens.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the mediating does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the corseting graphologist does not occur and the Jurassic occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the intensifying miserliness does not occur.; int4 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the Spartanness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Spartanness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the allotropicness happens and the scratch does not occur is not correct if the ascomycetousness does not occur. sent2: the preying Beckley happens. sent3: that both the corseting graphologist and the Jurassicness occurs is not correct. sent4: the fact that the mediatedness occurs is correct. sent5: the fact that the ratcheting peplum occurs is not wrong if the intensifying miserliness occurs. sent6: the ascomycetousness does not occur if that both the non-stereoscopicness and the radiotelephonicness happens does not hold. sent7: that the Spartan does not occur and the crossfire occurs is brought about by that the wobble does not occur. sent8: if the associativeness happens then the nonjudgmentalness happens. sent9: that the tetrametricness occurs and the harmonicness happens results in that the investigation does not occur. sent10: the wobble does not occur and the boricness does not occur if the bestness happens. sent11: if the corseting graphologist happens the intensifying miserliness does not occur. sent12: if the dissociation does not occur the best and the intensifying Gabonese occurs. sent13: the intensifying miserliness does not occur if the fact that not the corseting graphologist but the Jurassic occurs is not correct. sent14: if not the corseting graphologist but the Jurassicness occurs then the mediating does not occur. sent15: that the Platonisticness happens is brought about by that the nonjudgmentalness happens. sent16: the corseting graphologist does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the allotropicness but not the scratch occurs does not hold then the fact that the dissociation does not occur hold. sent18: the fact that the mediatedness does not occur is not incorrect if both the corseting graphologist and the Jurassicness occurs. sent19: that both the non-stereoscopicness and the radiotelephonicness happens does not hold if the Platonisticness occurs. sent20: the Spartanness does not occur if the intensifying miserliness happens. sent21: the Spartanness is triggered by that the intensifying miserliness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the corseting graphologist but the Jurassicness happens.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the mediating does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the corseting graphologist does not occur and the Jurassic occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the intensifying miserliness does not occur.; int4 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__