the buntal is low-tech and it qualifies Stanford.
sent1: that the buntal is low-tech and it does qualify Stanford is incorrect if the slash does not reschedule insufflation. sent2: the slash does reschedule insufflation and it is a kind of a bullion if the insufflation is not biographic. sent3: something is not a foreigner if it reschedules insufflation. sent4: if the osmium is biographic then the insufflation is not biographic. sent5: the methadone is not biographic if the fact that the slash does not see and/or it does not qualify hypersensitivity does not hold. sent6: the buntal is low-tech if the syndic is biographic. sent7: something that does reschedule consuetude is parliamentary. sent8: if the insufflation is a Scythian then it is biographic. sent9: that the syndic is a kind of a Scythian and it is biographic is incorrect. sent10: The consuetude does reschedule osmium. sent11: the cameraman is biographic. sent12: the insufflation is a bullion if the slash is not a saw and/or does not qualify hypersensitivity. sent13: the osmium does reschedule consuetude. sent14: the syndic is a browallia. sent15: that the buntal qualifies Stanford if the disaccharidase qualifies Stanford is not incorrect. sent16: if the fact that the methadone is a kind of a Scythian and does not qualify Stanford is incorrect then it is not low-tech. sent17: the fact that the syndic is a Scythian but it is not biographic is not correct if the methadone is not biographic. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a browallia the disaccharidase is parliamentary and it does qualify Stanford. sent19: the methadone does reschedule consuetude if that the syndic is a browallia hold. sent20: if that the syndic is both Scythian and not biographic does not hold the buntal is not non-low-tech. sent21: the methadone is not biographic if that the slash is not a saw and/or it does qualify hypersensitivity is false. sent22: the osmium is biographic and/or is not low-tech if there exists something such that it is not low-tech. sent23: if something is parliamentary then that it is Scythian and it does not qualify Stanford is not right. sent24: something that does reschedule consuetude does not reschedule insufflation. sent25: that the osmium does reschedule insufflation hold if the insufflation is a bullion. sent26: there is something such that it is not a browallia.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slash either is not a saw or does not qualify hypersensitivity or both.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the insufflation is a bullion.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the osmium reschedules insufflation.; sent24 -> int3: the osmium does not reschedule insufflation if it reschedules consuetude.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the osmium does not reschedule insufflation.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the slash is not a saw or it does not qualify hypersensitivity or both does not hold.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the methadone is not biographic.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the syndic is both not non-Scythian and not biographic is false is right.; int8 & sent20 -> int9: the buntal is low-tech.; sent26 & sent18 -> int10: the disaccharidase is parliamentary and it qualifies Stanford.; int10 -> int11: the disaccharidase qualifies Stanford.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the buntal qualifies Stanford.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that that it is not a foreigner hold.
sent3 -> int13: the slash is not a foreigner if it reschedules insufflation.; sent23 -> int14: if the methadone is parliamentary then that the fact that it is Scythian and it does not qualify Stanford is not wrong does not hold.; sent7 -> int15: if that the methadone does reschedule consuetude is not wrong it is parliamentary.; sent19 & sent14 -> int16: the methadone reschedules consuetude.; int15 & int16 -> int17: the methadone is parliamentary.; int14 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the methadone is a Scythian and does not qualify Stanford is not right.; sent16 & int18 -> int19: the methadone is not low-tech.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it is not low-tech.; int20 & sent22 -> int21: the osmium is biographic and/or it is not low-tech.;
$hypothesis$ = the buntal is low-tech and it qualifies Stanford. ; $context$ = sent1: that the buntal is low-tech and it does qualify Stanford is incorrect if the slash does not reschedule insufflation. sent2: the slash does reschedule insufflation and it is a kind of a bullion if the insufflation is not biographic. sent3: something is not a foreigner if it reschedules insufflation. sent4: if the osmium is biographic then the insufflation is not biographic. sent5: the methadone is not biographic if the fact that the slash does not see and/or it does not qualify hypersensitivity does not hold. sent6: the buntal is low-tech if the syndic is biographic. sent7: something that does reschedule consuetude is parliamentary. sent8: if the insufflation is a Scythian then it is biographic. sent9: that the syndic is a kind of a Scythian and it is biographic is incorrect. sent10: The consuetude does reschedule osmium. sent11: the cameraman is biographic. sent12: the insufflation is a bullion if the slash is not a saw and/or does not qualify hypersensitivity. sent13: the osmium does reschedule consuetude. sent14: the syndic is a browallia. sent15: that the buntal qualifies Stanford if the disaccharidase qualifies Stanford is not incorrect. sent16: if the fact that the methadone is a kind of a Scythian and does not qualify Stanford is incorrect then it is not low-tech. sent17: the fact that the syndic is a Scythian but it is not biographic is not correct if the methadone is not biographic. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a browallia the disaccharidase is parliamentary and it does qualify Stanford. sent19: the methadone does reschedule consuetude if that the syndic is a browallia hold. sent20: if that the syndic is both Scythian and not biographic does not hold the buntal is not non-low-tech. sent21: the methadone is not biographic if that the slash is not a saw and/or it does qualify hypersensitivity is false. sent22: the osmium is biographic and/or is not low-tech if there exists something such that it is not low-tech. sent23: if something is parliamentary then that it is Scythian and it does not qualify Stanford is not right. sent24: something that does reschedule consuetude does not reschedule insufflation. sent25: that the osmium does reschedule insufflation hold if the insufflation is a bullion. sent26: there is something such that it is not a browallia. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slash either is not a saw or does not qualify hypersensitivity or both.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the insufflation is a bullion.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the osmium reschedules insufflation.; sent24 -> int3: the osmium does not reschedule insufflation if it reschedules consuetude.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the osmium does not reschedule insufflation.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the slash is not a saw or it does not qualify hypersensitivity or both does not hold.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the methadone is not biographic.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the syndic is both not non-Scythian and not biographic is false is right.; int8 & sent20 -> int9: the buntal is low-tech.; sent26 & sent18 -> int10: the disaccharidase is parliamentary and it qualifies Stanford.; int10 -> int11: the disaccharidase qualifies Stanford.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the buntal qualifies Stanford.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__