the crying is a kind of a tendentiousness.
sent1: the crying does jellify kina. sent2: the crying is a tendentiousness if it is confrontational. sent3: something is not Venezuelan if it does exceed defecation. sent4: the crying is not non-confrontational. sent5: the crying preempts rebutter. sent6: that the foothill is confrontational hold. sent7: if something is not a Venezuelan it is not a ministrant and it is not confrontational. sent8: if something that is not a ministrant is non-confrontational it is not a tendentiousness. sent9: the measure is not a tipper. sent10: that the toucan is a tendentiousness is right. sent11: the fact that the crying is nonrepresentative is right. sent12: the iodocompound is a tendentiousness if it is a volatile.
sent2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the crying is not a tendentiousness.
sent8 -> int1: if the crying is not a ministrant and it is not confrontational it is not a tendentiousness.; sent7 -> int2: if the crying is not a kind of a Venezuelan then it is not a ministrant and not confrontational.; sent3 -> int3: if the crying exceeds defecation it is not a Venezuelan.; sent9 -> int4: there is something such that it is not a tipper.;
$hypothesis$ = the crying is a kind of a tendentiousness. ; $context$ = sent1: the crying does jellify kina. sent2: the crying is a tendentiousness if it is confrontational. sent3: something is not Venezuelan if it does exceed defecation. sent4: the crying is not non-confrontational. sent5: the crying preempts rebutter. sent6: that the foothill is confrontational hold. sent7: if something is not a Venezuelan it is not a ministrant and it is not confrontational. sent8: if something that is not a ministrant is non-confrontational it is not a tendentiousness. sent9: the measure is not a tipper. sent10: that the toucan is a tendentiousness is right. sent11: the fact that the crying is nonrepresentative is right. sent12: the iodocompound is a tendentiousness if it is a volatile. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__