something is dependable thing that is not infelicitous.
sent1: if something is sociolinguistic then the fact that it is exegetic thing that does not correspond homestead does not hold. sent2: something is not a teff and not a Selkup. sent3: there is something such that it is not infelicitous. sent4: the telescope is sociolinguistic. sent5: if there is something such that it is hadal the colloid is not a kind of a sacrifice. sent6: something is infelicitous and dependable if it is not exegetic. sent7: the waldmeister is dependable. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a teff and it is a Selkup is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a teff and it is not a Selkup does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the telescope is exegetic and does not correspond homestead does not hold then it is not exegetic.
there exists something such that the fact that that it is non-pentecostal thing that is not a frostbite hold is wrong.
sent6 -> int1: the telescope is not felicitous and it is dependable if it is not exegetic.; sent1 -> int2: if the telescope is sociolinguistic that it is exegetic and does not correspond homestead does not hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the telescope is exegetic but it does not correspond homestead is not correct.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the telescope is not exegetic.; int1 & int4 -> int5: the telescope is infelicitous thing that is dependable.; int5 -> int6: the telescope is infelicitous.; int6 -> int7: something is infelicitous.;
$hypothesis$ = something is dependable thing that is not infelicitous. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is sociolinguistic then the fact that it is exegetic thing that does not correspond homestead does not hold. sent2: something is not a teff and not a Selkup. sent3: there is something such that it is not infelicitous. sent4: the telescope is sociolinguistic. sent5: if there is something such that it is hadal the colloid is not a kind of a sacrifice. sent6: something is infelicitous and dependable if it is not exegetic. sent7: the waldmeister is dependable. sent8: there is something such that that it is not a teff and it is a Selkup is wrong. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a teff and it is not a Selkup does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the telescope is exegetic and does not correspond homestead does not hold then it is not exegetic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__