the arachnoid is not a lamprey and it is not a breakable.
sent1: the arachnoid is not a stretching if that the brimstone is a milk-vetch and is navigational is right. sent2: the wag is a rack that is not a lamprey. sent3: if the brimstone blocks portiere but it is not Tanzanian then it is a milk-vetch. sent4: if the arachnoid is not a kind of a stretching then that it is a lamprey and is not breakable does not hold. sent5: the fact that that the arachnoid is not a lamprey but breakable is correct is incorrect. sent6: the brimstone is navigational and it is best. sent7: something is not a lamprey and not a breakable if it is not navigational. sent8: that something is not a lamprey and it is not a breakable does not hold if that it is not a stretching hold. sent9: if something is not a stretching the fact that it is a lamprey that is not breakable is not correct. sent10: the committeewoman is otic and it is similar. sent11: that the arachnoid is not a lamprey and is a breakable does not hold if it is not a stretching. sent12: the toad-in-the-hole is not unbreakable. sent13: the fact that the brimstone is pious is true if the fact that it is a kind of a milk-vetch that does stock hold. sent14: the brimstone stretches. sent15: the brimstone does stretch and it is a best if the stovepipe is not cultural. sent16: the brimstone does block portiere and stretches. sent17: the arachnoid is not a kind of a best. sent18: the fact that the brimstone is both not a stretching and not navigational does not hold. sent19: that the stovepipe does rake choker and it is a thallophyte is wrong. sent20: the brimstone does begin wag. sent21: if that something does rake choker and it is a thallophyte does not hold the fact that it is not cultural is right. sent22: that the brimstone is not a milk-vetch but it is a stretching is not correct if it does not block portiere. sent23: the brimstone blocks portiere and is not a Tanzanian.
sent3 & sent23 -> int1: the brimstone is a kind of a milk-vetch.; sent6 -> int2: the brimstone is navigational.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the brimstone is a milk-vetch and it is navigational.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the arachnoid is not a stretching.; sent8 -> int5: that the arachnoid is not a lamprey and it is not a breakable is false if it is not a kind of a stretching.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the arachnoid is both not a lamprey and not breakable.
sent7 -> int6: if the arachnoid is not navigational then it is both not a lamprey and not a breakable.; sent21 -> int7: that the stovepipe is not cultural is not wrong if that it rakes choker and is a thallophyte is not right.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the stovepipe is not cultural.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the brimstone is a stretching and is a kind of a best.; int9 -> int10: the brimstone does stretch.;
$hypothesis$ = the arachnoid is not a lamprey and it is not a breakable. ; $context$ = sent1: the arachnoid is not a stretching if that the brimstone is a milk-vetch and is navigational is right. sent2: the wag is a rack that is not a lamprey. sent3: if the brimstone blocks portiere but it is not Tanzanian then it is a milk-vetch. sent4: if the arachnoid is not a kind of a stretching then that it is a lamprey and is not breakable does not hold. sent5: the fact that that the arachnoid is not a lamprey but breakable is correct is incorrect. sent6: the brimstone is navigational and it is best. sent7: something is not a lamprey and not a breakable if it is not navigational. sent8: that something is not a lamprey and it is not a breakable does not hold if that it is not a stretching hold. sent9: if something is not a stretching the fact that it is a lamprey that is not breakable is not correct. sent10: the committeewoman is otic and it is similar. sent11: that the arachnoid is not a lamprey and is a breakable does not hold if it is not a stretching. sent12: the toad-in-the-hole is not unbreakable. sent13: the fact that the brimstone is pious is true if the fact that it is a kind of a milk-vetch that does stock hold. sent14: the brimstone stretches. sent15: the brimstone does stretch and it is a best if the stovepipe is not cultural. sent16: the brimstone does block portiere and stretches. sent17: the arachnoid is not a kind of a best. sent18: the fact that the brimstone is both not a stretching and not navigational does not hold. sent19: that the stovepipe does rake choker and it is a thallophyte is wrong. sent20: the brimstone does begin wag. sent21: if that something does rake choker and it is a thallophyte does not hold the fact that it is not cultural is right. sent22: that the brimstone is not a milk-vetch but it is a stretching is not correct if it does not block portiere. sent23: the brimstone blocks portiere and is not a Tanzanian. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent23 -> int1: the brimstone is a kind of a milk-vetch.; sent6 -> int2: the brimstone is navigational.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the brimstone is a milk-vetch and it is navigational.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the arachnoid is not a stretching.; sent8 -> int5: that the arachnoid is not a lamprey and it is not a breakable is false if it is not a kind of a stretching.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__