the isopropanol is not a Appalachian.
sent1: that the tambourine outnumbers sublieutenant is correct. sent2: the isopropanol does outnumber sublieutenant. sent3: the broad does not outnumber isopropanol if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-outdoors thing that is not a kind of a gradual is not incorrect is incorrect. sent4: the isopropanol is not a kind of a Appalachian if it seeps and adapts Dari. sent5: something is Appalachian and it is a hyperactivity if it is not unmilitary. sent6: if the isopropanol is unmilitary the fact that it does not reorient Bedlam and does not mooch tuner is incorrect. sent7: if the broad does not outnumber isopropanol the fact that it does not outnumber guama and is not hand-held is not true. sent8: if there is something such that it outnumbers guama that the pylorus does outnumber sublieutenant and seeps is not right. sent9: if that the broad does not outnumber guama and is non-hand-held is not correct then it does outnumber guama. sent10: the fact that the isopropanol does reorient Bedlam and does not mooch tuner is false if it is unmilitary. sent11: the fact that something does not mooch tuner but it does reorient Bedlam is wrong if it does not adapt Dari. sent12: the isopropanol is a kind of a gasmask that is a AAVE. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is not outdoors and it is not a gradual is wrong. sent14: if that the isopropanol is a kind of non-chylific thing that does not mooch tuner does not hold then the fact that it outnumbers pylorus is correct. sent15: if the isopropanol is unmilitary then that it does not reorient Bedlam and mooches tuner is not correct. sent16: the fact that the isopropanol is a cayenne but it is military does not hold. sent17: that the sublieutenant is not outdoors and it does not mooch tuner is not true. sent18: the fact that the isopropanol is a hyperactivity and it is unmilitary hold. sent19: that the isopropanol is not a partial and does outnumber Sisyphus is not right. sent20: the fact that the isopropanol reorients Bedlam but it does not mooch tuner does not hold. sent21: the isopropanol seeps and it outnumbers sublieutenant. sent22: that the isopropanol does not reorient Bedlam but it mooches tuner is incorrect.
sent18 -> int1: the isopropanol is unmilitary.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the isopropanol does not reorient Bedlam and does not mooch tuner does not hold.; sent21 -> int3: the isopropanol seeps.;
the isopropanol is a Appalachian.
sent5 -> int4: if the isopropanol is not unmilitary it is Appalachian and a hyperactivity.; sent11 -> int5: that the fact that the pylorus does not mooch tuner but it reorients Bedlam is not false is not correct if it does not adapt Dari.; sent13 & sent3 -> int6: the broad does not outnumber isopropanol.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: that the broad does not outnumber guama and is non-hand-held is incorrect.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the broad outnumbers guama.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it does outnumber guama is not wrong.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: that the pylorus outnumbers sublieutenant and it seeps is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the isopropanol is not a Appalachian. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tambourine outnumbers sublieutenant is correct. sent2: the isopropanol does outnumber sublieutenant. sent3: the broad does not outnumber isopropanol if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-outdoors thing that is not a kind of a gradual is not incorrect is incorrect. sent4: the isopropanol is not a kind of a Appalachian if it seeps and adapts Dari. sent5: something is Appalachian and it is a hyperactivity if it is not unmilitary. sent6: if the isopropanol is unmilitary the fact that it does not reorient Bedlam and does not mooch tuner is incorrect. sent7: if the broad does not outnumber isopropanol the fact that it does not outnumber guama and is not hand-held is not true. sent8: if there is something such that it outnumbers guama that the pylorus does outnumber sublieutenant and seeps is not right. sent9: if that the broad does not outnumber guama and is non-hand-held is not correct then it does outnumber guama. sent10: the fact that the isopropanol does reorient Bedlam and does not mooch tuner is false if it is unmilitary. sent11: the fact that something does not mooch tuner but it does reorient Bedlam is wrong if it does not adapt Dari. sent12: the isopropanol is a kind of a gasmask that is a AAVE. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is not outdoors and it is not a gradual is wrong. sent14: if that the isopropanol is a kind of non-chylific thing that does not mooch tuner does not hold then the fact that it outnumbers pylorus is correct. sent15: if the isopropanol is unmilitary then that it does not reorient Bedlam and mooches tuner is not correct. sent16: the fact that the isopropanol is a cayenne but it is military does not hold. sent17: that the sublieutenant is not outdoors and it does not mooch tuner is not true. sent18: the fact that the isopropanol is a hyperactivity and it is unmilitary hold. sent19: that the isopropanol is not a partial and does outnumber Sisyphus is not right. sent20: the fact that the isopropanol reorients Bedlam but it does not mooch tuner does not hold. sent21: the isopropanol seeps and it outnumbers sublieutenant. sent22: that the isopropanol does not reorient Bedlam but it mooches tuner is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the isopropanol is unmilitary.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the isopropanol does not reorient Bedlam and does not mooch tuner does not hold.; sent21 -> int3: the isopropanol seeps.; __UNKNOWN__