the locule is not a Rajab.
sent1: if the Redskin does rabbet Mbabane that the Alexandrian rabbet Mbabane and is a psychologist is not right. sent2: that something is a kind of non-saxicolous thing that does not astringe keloid is wrong if it is not seaward. sent3: if the intussusception is both not a Shivaist and not a anestrus the Alexandrian is a Shivaist. sent4: something does astringe keloid if that it is a kind of non-saxicolous thing that does not astringe keloid is not true. sent5: the intussusception is not a Shivaist if there exists something such that that it is a bush but not unstuck does not hold. sent6: if the Alexandrian does astringe keloid and it is a Shivaist the Redskin does not astringe keloid. sent7: the fact that the Alexandrian does rabbet Mbabane and it is a psychologist is wrong. sent8: the weave does not rabbet Mbabane if the Redskin does not astringe keloid. sent9: the weave is a Northrop. sent10: if the naiad is not a conceivableness the fact that it is a anestrus and it is not a psychologist is not right. sent11: if the Alexandrian is a psychologist the intussusception astringes keloid. sent12: the fact that the intussusception is not a anestrus is not false if the fact that the naiad is a anestrus but it is not a kind of a psychologist is not right. sent13: the fact that the Alexandrian does rabbet Mbabane but it is not a psychologist is false if the Redskin does rabbet Mbabane. sent14: something is not a kind of a conceivableness if the fact that it does not identify Prague and/or it does not wear Grimm is false. sent15: the Alexandrian is non-seaward if something that does identify basil is downmarket. sent16: that the periselene is a bush but it is not unstuck does not hold. sent17: if the intussusception does astringe keloid then the locule is a Rajab. sent18: there exists something such that it is a Northrop. sent19: The revisionism identifies weave. sent20: that either the naiad does not identify Prague or it does not wear Grimm or both is wrong. sent21: the racketeer does identify basil and it is downmarket. sent22: if that the Alexandrian rabbets Mbabane but it is not a kind of a psychologist is wrong then the intussusception does astringe keloid. sent23: the weave identifies revisionism. sent24: the Redskin does rabbet Mbabane if something that does identify revisionism is a Northrop.
sent23 & sent9 -> int1: the weave identifies revisionism and it is a Northrop.; int1 -> int2: something identifies revisionism and is a kind of a Northrop.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the Redskin rabbets Mbabane.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: that the Alexandrian does rabbet Mbabane but it is not a psychologist is not true.; sent22 & int4 -> int5: the intussusception does astringe keloid.; sent17 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the locule is not a Rajab.
sent4 -> int6: the Alexandrian astringes keloid if the fact that it is a kind of non-saxicolous thing that does not astringes keloid is not true.; sent2 -> int7: if the Alexandrian is not seaward the fact that it is not saxicolous and it does not astringe keloid does not hold.; sent21 -> int8: something does identify basil and it is downmarket.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the Alexandrian is not seaward.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the Alexandrian is not saxicolous and it does not astringe keloid is not right.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Alexandrian astringes keloid.; sent16 -> int12: there is something such that that it does bush and is not unstuck is false.; int12 & sent5 -> int13: the intussusception is not a Shivaist.; sent14 -> int14: the naiad is not a conceivableness if the fact that it does not identify Prague or does not wear Grimm or both does not hold.; int14 & sent20 -> int15: the fact that the naiad is not a conceivableness is not incorrect.; sent10 & int15 -> int16: that the naiad is a anestrus but it is not a psychologist is wrong.; sent12 & int16 -> int17: the intussusception is not a anestrus.; int13 & int17 -> int18: the intussusception is both not a Shivaist and not a anestrus.; sent3 & int18 -> int19: the Alexandrian is a Shivaist.; int11 & int19 -> int20: the Alexandrian astringes keloid and it is a Shivaist.; sent6 & int20 -> int21: the Redskin does not astringe keloid.; sent8 & int21 -> int22: the weave does not rabbet Mbabane.;
$hypothesis$ = the locule is not a Rajab. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Redskin does rabbet Mbabane that the Alexandrian rabbet Mbabane and is a psychologist is not right. sent2: that something is a kind of non-saxicolous thing that does not astringe keloid is wrong if it is not seaward. sent3: if the intussusception is both not a Shivaist and not a anestrus the Alexandrian is a Shivaist. sent4: something does astringe keloid if that it is a kind of non-saxicolous thing that does not astringe keloid is not true. sent5: the intussusception is not a Shivaist if there exists something such that that it is a bush but not unstuck does not hold. sent6: if the Alexandrian does astringe keloid and it is a Shivaist the Redskin does not astringe keloid. sent7: the fact that the Alexandrian does rabbet Mbabane and it is a psychologist is wrong. sent8: the weave does not rabbet Mbabane if the Redskin does not astringe keloid. sent9: the weave is a Northrop. sent10: if the naiad is not a conceivableness the fact that it is a anestrus and it is not a psychologist is not right. sent11: if the Alexandrian is a psychologist the intussusception astringes keloid. sent12: the fact that the intussusception is not a anestrus is not false if the fact that the naiad is a anestrus but it is not a kind of a psychologist is not right. sent13: the fact that the Alexandrian does rabbet Mbabane but it is not a psychologist is false if the Redskin does rabbet Mbabane. sent14: something is not a kind of a conceivableness if the fact that it does not identify Prague and/or it does not wear Grimm is false. sent15: the Alexandrian is non-seaward if something that does identify basil is downmarket. sent16: that the periselene is a bush but it is not unstuck does not hold. sent17: if the intussusception does astringe keloid then the locule is a Rajab. sent18: there exists something such that it is a Northrop. sent19: The revisionism identifies weave. sent20: that either the naiad does not identify Prague or it does not wear Grimm or both is wrong. sent21: the racketeer does identify basil and it is downmarket. sent22: if that the Alexandrian rabbets Mbabane but it is not a kind of a psychologist is wrong then the intussusception does astringe keloid. sent23: the weave identifies revisionism. sent24: the Redskin does rabbet Mbabane if something that does identify revisionism is a Northrop. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent9 -> int1: the weave identifies revisionism and it is a Northrop.; int1 -> int2: something identifies revisionism and is a kind of a Northrop.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the Redskin rabbets Mbabane.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: that the Alexandrian does rabbet Mbabane but it is not a psychologist is not true.; sent22 & int4 -> int5: the intussusception does astringe keloid.; sent17 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__