the birdcall is a stoic.
sent1: the fact that something targets Kinosternidae and is not sacramental does not hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cuniculus is correct. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does beep crapaud and it is a Hawaiian is incorrect. sent3: the birdcall is a stoic if the ordinary targets Kinosternidae but it is not a Cuniculus. sent4: the cornet is not a Cuniculus if the fact that the interchange is not a Cuniculus is not incorrect. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it does beep crapaud and is a Hawaiian is not right the interchange does not platinize pendragon. sent6: the fact that the pendragon does beep crapaud or it is a Hawaiian or both is true if it does not beep Avahi. sent7: the fact that something does not platinize kick but it is stoic is not correct if the fact that it does not target Kinosternidae hold. sent8: something that does platinize kick does target Kinosternidae. sent9: if there is something such that that it is a lunette and does beep Desmodontidae is incorrect then the ordinary does platinize kick. sent10: the interchange is not a Cuniculus if the fact that the visualizer is not a Cuniculus and is a reveler is not true. sent11: if something does not platinize pendragon then the fact that it is sacramental and/or not a reveler is incorrect. sent12: the ordinary is not a Cuniculus. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a lunette and it beeps Desmodontidae is not right. sent14: the ordinary is not a kind of a stoic and/or it is not a Cuniculus if something is not a Cuniculus. sent15: the birdcall is a kind of a Cuniculus if there is something such that that it is a stoic and it does platinize kick does not hold. sent16: the ordinary does not target Kinosternidae if the fact that the cornet does target Kinosternidae but it is non-sacramental does not hold. sent17: if the pendragon platinizes pendragon then the fact that the visualizer is not a Cuniculus and is a reveler is false. sent18: the birdcall does not platinize kick if the ordinary is not a stoic and/or is not a Cuniculus.
sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the ordinary does platinize kick.; sent8 -> int2: if the ordinary does platinize kick then it targets Kinosternidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ordinary targets Kinosternidae.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the ordinary does target Kinosternidae but it is not a Cuniculus.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the birdcall is not a stoic.
sent7 -> int5: the fact that the ordinary does not platinize kick but it is not non-stoic is false if it does not target Kinosternidae.; sent1 -> int6: if the cornet is not a kind of a Cuniculus then the fact that it targets Kinosternidae and is not sacramental is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the birdcall is a stoic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something targets Kinosternidae and is not sacramental does not hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cuniculus is correct. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does beep crapaud and it is a Hawaiian is incorrect. sent3: the birdcall is a stoic if the ordinary targets Kinosternidae but it is not a Cuniculus. sent4: the cornet is not a Cuniculus if the fact that the interchange is not a Cuniculus is not incorrect. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it does beep crapaud and is a Hawaiian is not right the interchange does not platinize pendragon. sent6: the fact that the pendragon does beep crapaud or it is a Hawaiian or both is true if it does not beep Avahi. sent7: the fact that something does not platinize kick but it is stoic is not correct if the fact that it does not target Kinosternidae hold. sent8: something that does platinize kick does target Kinosternidae. sent9: if there is something such that that it is a lunette and does beep Desmodontidae is incorrect then the ordinary does platinize kick. sent10: the interchange is not a Cuniculus if the fact that the visualizer is not a Cuniculus and is a reveler is not true. sent11: if something does not platinize pendragon then the fact that it is sacramental and/or not a reveler is incorrect. sent12: the ordinary is not a Cuniculus. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is a lunette and it beeps Desmodontidae is not right. sent14: the ordinary is not a kind of a stoic and/or it is not a Cuniculus if something is not a Cuniculus. sent15: the birdcall is a kind of a Cuniculus if there is something such that that it is a stoic and it does platinize kick does not hold. sent16: the ordinary does not target Kinosternidae if the fact that the cornet does target Kinosternidae but it is non-sacramental does not hold. sent17: if the pendragon platinizes pendragon then the fact that the visualizer is not a Cuniculus and is a reveler is false. sent18: the birdcall does not platinize kick if the ordinary is not a stoic and/or is not a Cuniculus. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the ordinary does platinize kick.; sent8 -> int2: if the ordinary does platinize kick then it targets Kinosternidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ordinary targets Kinosternidae.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the ordinary does target Kinosternidae but it is not a Cuniculus.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__