the multipleness happens.
sent1: not the subjecting sash but the intelligentness occurs. sent2: both the subjecting web and the yellowing happens. sent3: if the subjecting onion does not occur that the rumination and the FM happens is not right. sent4: the beatification does not occur if that the supervention does not occur and the percolation does not occur is not true. sent5: the utilization happens. sent6: if the narrating pickelhaube happens and the multipleness occurs the easiness does not occur. sent7: if the premiership does not occur the blend occurs. sent8: if the premiership happens the easiness does not occur and/or the blend occurs. sent9: that both the multipleness and the narrating pickelhaube happens is brought about by the non-pyrotechnicness. sent10: the coaching does not occur if the prelacy does not occur and the quiz happens. sent11: that the subjecting diffuseness occurs is triggered by that the sterilization does not occur. sent12: if that the fact that both the rumination and the FM occurs is not true is not false then the rumination does not occur. sent13: the anthropocentricness occurs and the snaking happens. sent14: the depriving hurdy-gurdy does not occur. sent15: that not the cutinizing acromion but the subjecting factory occurs triggers that the premiership does not occur. sent16: the cutinizing acromion does not occur but the subjecting factory occurs. sent17: the depriving Fontenoy does not occur. sent18: that the subjecting mods does not occur and the pounding occurs causes the non-etymologicalness. sent19: the premiership does not occur if both the cutinizing acromion and the subjecting factory happens. sent20: the fact that the supervention does not occur and the percolation does not occur is incorrect. sent21: if the nonjudgmentalness does not occur the counter occurs. sent22: that the premiership does not occur triggers that the blending occurs and the easiness occurs. sent23: that both the destructibleness and the cooking happens is triggered by that the beatification does not occur. sent24: if the destructibleness but not the rumination happens the subjecting factory does not occur. sent25: the narrating pickelhaube and the pyrotechnicness occurs.
sent25 -> int1: the narrating pickelhaube happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the multipleness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the narrating pickelhaube happens and the multipleness happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the easiness does not occur.; sent15 & sent16 -> int4: the premiership does not occur.; sent22 & int4 -> int5: the blending and the easiness happens.; int5 -> int6: the easiness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the multiple happens.
sent4 & sent20 -> int8: the beatification does not occur.; sent23 & int8 -> int9: the destructibleness occurs and the cooking happens.; int9 -> int10: the destructibleness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the multipleness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: not the subjecting sash but the intelligentness occurs. sent2: both the subjecting web and the yellowing happens. sent3: if the subjecting onion does not occur that the rumination and the FM happens is not right. sent4: the beatification does not occur if that the supervention does not occur and the percolation does not occur is not true. sent5: the utilization happens. sent6: if the narrating pickelhaube happens and the multipleness occurs the easiness does not occur. sent7: if the premiership does not occur the blend occurs. sent8: if the premiership happens the easiness does not occur and/or the blend occurs. sent9: that both the multipleness and the narrating pickelhaube happens is brought about by the non-pyrotechnicness. sent10: the coaching does not occur if the prelacy does not occur and the quiz happens. sent11: that the subjecting diffuseness occurs is triggered by that the sterilization does not occur. sent12: if that the fact that both the rumination and the FM occurs is not true is not false then the rumination does not occur. sent13: the anthropocentricness occurs and the snaking happens. sent14: the depriving hurdy-gurdy does not occur. sent15: that not the cutinizing acromion but the subjecting factory occurs triggers that the premiership does not occur. sent16: the cutinizing acromion does not occur but the subjecting factory occurs. sent17: the depriving Fontenoy does not occur. sent18: that the subjecting mods does not occur and the pounding occurs causes the non-etymologicalness. sent19: the premiership does not occur if both the cutinizing acromion and the subjecting factory happens. sent20: the fact that the supervention does not occur and the percolation does not occur is incorrect. sent21: if the nonjudgmentalness does not occur the counter occurs. sent22: that the premiership does not occur triggers that the blending occurs and the easiness occurs. sent23: that both the destructibleness and the cooking happens is triggered by that the beatification does not occur. sent24: if the destructibleness but not the rumination happens the subjecting factory does not occur. sent25: the narrating pickelhaube and the pyrotechnicness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 -> int1: the narrating pickelhaube happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the multipleness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the narrating pickelhaube happens and the multipleness happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the easiness does not occur.; sent15 & sent16 -> int4: the premiership does not occur.; sent22 & int4 -> int5: the blending and the easiness happens.; int5 -> int6: the easiness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__