that the fratricide is a kind of non-nonslippery thing that is not non-accessional does not hold.
sent1: the coatee does not tweeze injector and is nonslippery. sent2: the fratricide is not nonslippery. sent3: that the hypermastigote is resistible and it is analogous does not hold. sent4: the representation is analogous. sent5: if the hypermastigote is defiant then the fact that the fratricide is non-resistible thing that is accessional does not hold. sent6: that the hypermastigote is a kind of irresistible thing that is analogous is not true if the representation is an internship. sent7: if the hypermastigote is resistible then it is inflectional. sent8: if the representation is not defiant then the fratricide is not a kind of an internship and it is not inflectional. sent9: the sequencer is inflectional. sent10: that the representation is not a kind of an internship but it is inflectional is not right. sent11: that something is not nonslippery but it is accessional is not true if it is not an internship. sent12: the representation is not calceolate. sent13: that the hypermastigote is both not irresistible and not non-analogous does not hold if the representation is a kind of an internship. sent14: the hypermastigote is defiant. sent15: the hypermastigote is not nonslippery. sent16: the fratricide is accessional if it is not non-defiant. sent17: the representation is an internship. sent18: the fratricide is both not a respondent and Tibetan. sent19: if something is resistible it is inflectional. sent20: if the fratricide is inflectional the hypermastigote is defiant. sent21: if the hypermastigote is inflectional the fratricide is defiant. sent22: the representation is defiant if the fact that it is a kind of an internship is not false. sent23: if the fact that something is not resistible and is analogous does not hold then it is inflectional.
sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that the hypermastigote is both not resistible and analogous is incorrect.; sent23 -> int2: if that the hypermastigote is not resistible and is analogous is not correct then it is inflectional.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hypermastigote is inflectional is not wrong.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the fratricide is defiant hold.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the fratricide is accessional is not false.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fratricide is not nonslippery but it is accessional is not correct.
sent11 -> int6: if the fratricide is not a kind of an internship then the fact that it is both slippery and not non-accessional is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fratricide is a kind of non-nonslippery thing that is not non-accessional does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the coatee does not tweeze injector and is nonslippery. sent2: the fratricide is not nonslippery. sent3: that the hypermastigote is resistible and it is analogous does not hold. sent4: the representation is analogous. sent5: if the hypermastigote is defiant then the fact that the fratricide is non-resistible thing that is accessional does not hold. sent6: that the hypermastigote is a kind of irresistible thing that is analogous is not true if the representation is an internship. sent7: if the hypermastigote is resistible then it is inflectional. sent8: if the representation is not defiant then the fratricide is not a kind of an internship and it is not inflectional. sent9: the sequencer is inflectional. sent10: that the representation is not a kind of an internship but it is inflectional is not right. sent11: that something is not nonslippery but it is accessional is not true if it is not an internship. sent12: the representation is not calceolate. sent13: that the hypermastigote is both not irresistible and not non-analogous does not hold if the representation is a kind of an internship. sent14: the hypermastigote is defiant. sent15: the hypermastigote is not nonslippery. sent16: the fratricide is accessional if it is not non-defiant. sent17: the representation is an internship. sent18: the fratricide is both not a respondent and Tibetan. sent19: if something is resistible it is inflectional. sent20: if the fratricide is inflectional the hypermastigote is defiant. sent21: if the hypermastigote is inflectional the fratricide is defiant. sent22: the representation is defiant if the fact that it is a kind of an internship is not false. sent23: if the fact that something is not resistible and is analogous does not hold then it is inflectional. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that the hypermastigote is both not resistible and analogous is incorrect.; sent23 -> int2: if that the hypermastigote is not resistible and is analogous is not correct then it is inflectional.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hypermastigote is inflectional is not wrong.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the fratricide is defiant hold.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the fratricide is accessional is not false.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__