the threadfin is not a teraflop if the throstle is a kind of an upright.
sent1: the fact that if there is something such that it is manual then the throstle is not nasopharyngeal and it is not a kind of a tetherball is not wrong. sent2: something that is not nasopharyngeal and is not a tetherball does not severalize prudence. sent3: if the fact that the threadfin is worthless and it is salable is wrong then it is not a kind of a teraflop. sent4: something does severalize prudence if it is both not nasopharyngeal and a tetherball. sent5: the elytron is nasopharyngeal. sent6: if the fact that something is a kind of a tetherball and it is nasopharyngeal is not right it is nasopharyngeal. sent7: if the vaulter is a kind of a teraflop then it is salable and does not severalize expurgator. sent8: that the fact that the threadfin does severalize prudence and is nasopharyngeal is not wrong is not correct if the throstle is not nasopharyngeal. sent9: if there is something such that it is not upright then the fact that the throstle does not severalize prudence but it is an upright does not hold. sent10: the threadfin severalizes expurgator if the vaulter is a kind of salable thing that does not severalizes expurgator. sent11: if something that is not non-nasopharyngeal is not a tetherball it severalizes prudence. sent12: that the throstle is not a teraflop is not false. sent13: if the throstle is both not nasopharyngeal and a tetherball then it severalizes prudence. sent14: the hassock is not manual if that the throstle does not severalize prudence and is an upright is not true. sent15: that the vaulter is a teraflop is right. sent16: the throstle is not worthless if that the threadfin does severalize expurgator is not wrong. sent17: the threadfin is not a teraflop if it is not worthless. sent18: if the throstle is not salable then that the threadfin is worthless and it is salable is not right. sent19: the throstle is an action. sent20: the throstle is not salable if it does not severalize expurgator. sent21: that the throstle does severalize prudence is correct if it is a kind of nasopharyngeal thing that is not a tetherball. sent22: if the throstle is an upright that severalizes prudence it does not severalize expurgator. sent23: there is something such that it is a kind of a manual. sent24: there is something such that it does mythologize. sent25: if the fact that the threadfin severalizes expurgator and it severalizes prudence is not true then it is not salable. sent26: the throstle does not manhandle expert. sent27: the threadfin is a teraflop.
sent23 & sent1 -> int1: the throstle is non-nasopharyngeal thing that is not a kind of a tetherball.; sent2 -> int2: if the throstle is not nasopharyngeal and is not a tetherball then it severalizes prudence.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the throstle severalizes prudence.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the throstle is a kind of an upright.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the throstle is an upright and does severalize prudence.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the throstle does not severalize expurgator.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the throstle is not salable.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the fact that the threadfin is worthless and salable is not correct.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the threadfin is not a teraflop.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the hassock is non-nasopharyngeal.
sent6 -> int9: if that the hassock is a kind of a tetherball and it is nasopharyngeal does not hold then it is not nasopharyngeal.; sent7 & sent15 -> int10: the vaulter is salable and does not severalize expurgator.; sent10 & int10 -> int11: the threadfin severalizes expurgator.;
$hypothesis$ = the threadfin is not a teraflop if the throstle is a kind of an upright. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if there is something such that it is manual then the throstle is not nasopharyngeal and it is not a kind of a tetherball is not wrong. sent2: something that is not nasopharyngeal and is not a tetherball does not severalize prudence. sent3: if the fact that the threadfin is worthless and it is salable is wrong then it is not a kind of a teraflop. sent4: something does severalize prudence if it is both not nasopharyngeal and a tetherball. sent5: the elytron is nasopharyngeal. sent6: if the fact that something is a kind of a tetherball and it is nasopharyngeal is not right it is nasopharyngeal. sent7: if the vaulter is a kind of a teraflop then it is salable and does not severalize expurgator. sent8: that the fact that the threadfin does severalize prudence and is nasopharyngeal is not wrong is not correct if the throstle is not nasopharyngeal. sent9: if there is something such that it is not upright then the fact that the throstle does not severalize prudence but it is an upright does not hold. sent10: the threadfin severalizes expurgator if the vaulter is a kind of salable thing that does not severalizes expurgator. sent11: if something that is not non-nasopharyngeal is not a tetherball it severalizes prudence. sent12: that the throstle is not a teraflop is not false. sent13: if the throstle is both not nasopharyngeal and a tetherball then it severalizes prudence. sent14: the hassock is not manual if that the throstle does not severalize prudence and is an upright is not true. sent15: that the vaulter is a teraflop is right. sent16: the throstle is not worthless if that the threadfin does severalize expurgator is not wrong. sent17: the threadfin is not a teraflop if it is not worthless. sent18: if the throstle is not salable then that the threadfin is worthless and it is salable is not right. sent19: the throstle is an action. sent20: the throstle is not salable if it does not severalize expurgator. sent21: that the throstle does severalize prudence is correct if it is a kind of nasopharyngeal thing that is not a tetherball. sent22: if the throstle is an upright that severalizes prudence it does not severalize expurgator. sent23: there is something such that it is a kind of a manual. sent24: there is something such that it does mythologize. sent25: if the fact that the threadfin severalizes expurgator and it severalizes prudence is not true then it is not salable. sent26: the throstle does not manhandle expert. sent27: the threadfin is a teraflop. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent1 -> int1: the throstle is non-nasopharyngeal thing that is not a kind of a tetherball.; sent2 -> int2: if the throstle is not nasopharyngeal and is not a tetherball then it severalizes prudence.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the throstle severalizes prudence.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the throstle is a kind of an upright.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the throstle is an upright and does severalize prudence.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the throstle does not severalize expurgator.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the throstle is not salable.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the fact that the threadfin is worthless and salable is not correct.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the threadfin is not a teraflop.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__