the chicane is a Garrick.
sent1: if the chicane is not a Garrick then that it does not churn missionary and is a kind of a pronominal is not correct. sent2: the chicane is not unhappy. sent3: everything is not a internuncio and churns reciprocity. sent4: the moonshell does not churn missionary. sent5: if the chicane is not a Garrick then the fact that it does not listen and is ungulate does not hold. sent6: if the chicane is not a Garrick the fact that it is both not an outskirts and disciplinary does not hold. sent7: if the chrism does not churn sanicle then that it does not wrangle and is Caroline is not right. sent8: the chicane does not churn missionary but it is histological. sent9: everything is non-fitted thing that does flounder fidget. sent10: the chicane does not rap filovirus. sent11: the chicane is not a counterattack but it is a kind of a gastrulation. sent12: the wingman is a kind of a Garrick. sent13: everything is lexicostatistics. sent14: the gastropod is a kind of a Garrick. sent15: that the chicane is not front but a progressive is not true. sent16: everything is not a walleye but a quadratics. sent17: the fact that the back is not a Garrick and does drug is false. sent18: the filovirus is not a kind of a Garrick but it churns quickset. sent19: everything is not a kind of a scooter and it is adequate. sent20: everything is pietistic. sent21: the reactionary does not churn missionary.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chicane is not a Garrick.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the chicane does not churn missionary but it is a pronominal does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the chicane is a Garrick. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chicane is not a Garrick then that it does not churn missionary and is a kind of a pronominal is not correct. sent2: the chicane is not unhappy. sent3: everything is not a internuncio and churns reciprocity. sent4: the moonshell does not churn missionary. sent5: if the chicane is not a Garrick then the fact that it does not listen and is ungulate does not hold. sent6: if the chicane is not a Garrick the fact that it is both not an outskirts and disciplinary does not hold. sent7: if the chrism does not churn sanicle then that it does not wrangle and is Caroline is not right. sent8: the chicane does not churn missionary but it is histological. sent9: everything is non-fitted thing that does flounder fidget. sent10: the chicane does not rap filovirus. sent11: the chicane is not a counterattack but it is a kind of a gastrulation. sent12: the wingman is a kind of a Garrick. sent13: everything is lexicostatistics. sent14: the gastropod is a kind of a Garrick. sent15: that the chicane is not front but a progressive is not true. sent16: everything is not a walleye but a quadratics. sent17: the fact that the back is not a Garrick and does drug is false. sent18: the filovirus is not a kind of a Garrick but it churns quickset. sent19: everything is not a kind of a scooter and it is adequate. sent20: everything is pietistic. sent21: the reactionary does not churn missionary. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chicane is not a Garrick.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the chicane does not churn missionary but it is a pronominal does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__