that there exists something such that if it is not a dicloxacillin then the fact that the fact that it does not tool sneak and it is non-palatial hold is not right is incorrect.
sent1: that the fact that something is both not a ceramic and not tetragonal is right is incorrect if that it is not kinesthetic is true. sent2: that something does not nail masculinity and it is not an electrician does not hold if it is not a slur. sent3: the polyethylene does not tool sneak and it is not palatial if it is not a kind of a dicloxacillin. sent4: that the polyethylene is not a dicloxacillin and it is not a Hippobosca is not true. sent5: if the will-o'-the-wisp is not a list the fact that it does not snuffle wig and it tools sneak is wrong. sent6: if the polyethylene is not discomycetous then that that it tools sneak and is not palatial is true does not hold. sent7: that the fact that the endoparasite is not the wit and it does not tool sneak is wrong if the endoparasite is not a severance is true. sent8: that the polyethylene does tool sneak but it is not palatial does not hold if the fact that it is not a dicloxacillin is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that something does tool sneak but it is not palatial is wrong if it is not discomycetous. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a dicloxacillin it does not tool sneak and is not palatial. sent11: the polyethylene is contemptible. sent12: if something is not discomycetous then the fact that it does not tool sneak and it is not palatial is not right. sent13: if that the polyethylene is a kind of a dicloxacillin that is discomycetous hold it is not a Melissa. sent14: the fact that the polyethylene tools sneak but it is not palatial is not right. sent15: the fact that the polyethylene is not a Melissa hold if it is not a dicloxacillin and it is discomycetous. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a dicloxacillin the fact that it does not tool sneak and is not palatial does not hold. sent17: the fact that that the polyethylene does not tool sneak but it is palatial is true is not true if that it is not a dicloxacillin is right. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a dicloxacillin then that it does not tool sneak and it is palatial is false. sent19: that something is both not a Melissa and not a dicloxacillin is not right if it is not discomycetous. sent20: if the polyethylene is contemptible it is a Melissa. sent21: the damson is not palatial.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the polyethylene is not a kind of a dicloxacillin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polyethylene is discomycetous.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the polyethylene is not a dicloxacillin but discomycetous.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the polyethylene is not a kind of a Melissa.; sent20 & sent11 -> int3: the polyethylene is a Melissa.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the polyethylene is not discomycetous.; sent12 -> int6: the fact that the polyethylene does not tool sneak and is not palatial is incorrect if it is non-discomycetous.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the polyethylene does not tool sneak and is not palatial is not right.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: if the polyethylene is not a dicloxacillin then the fact that it does not tool sneak and it is not palatial does not hold.; int8 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not kinesthetic the fact that it is not a ceramic and is not tetragonal is incorrect.
sent1 -> int9: if the fact that the polyethylene is not kinesthetic is correct the fact that it is both non-ceramic and non-tetragonal is false.; int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a dicloxacillin then the fact that the fact that it does not tool sneak and it is non-palatial hold is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that something is both not a ceramic and not tetragonal is right is incorrect if that it is not kinesthetic is true. sent2: that something does not nail masculinity and it is not an electrician does not hold if it is not a slur. sent3: the polyethylene does not tool sneak and it is not palatial if it is not a kind of a dicloxacillin. sent4: that the polyethylene is not a dicloxacillin and it is not a Hippobosca is not true. sent5: if the will-o'-the-wisp is not a list the fact that it does not snuffle wig and it tools sneak is wrong. sent6: if the polyethylene is not discomycetous then that that it tools sneak and is not palatial is true does not hold. sent7: that the fact that the endoparasite is not the wit and it does not tool sneak is wrong if the endoparasite is not a severance is true. sent8: that the polyethylene does tool sneak but it is not palatial does not hold if the fact that it is not a dicloxacillin is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that something does tool sneak but it is not palatial is wrong if it is not discomycetous. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a dicloxacillin it does not tool sneak and is not palatial. sent11: the polyethylene is contemptible. sent12: if something is not discomycetous then the fact that it does not tool sneak and it is not palatial is not right. sent13: if that the polyethylene is a kind of a dicloxacillin that is discomycetous hold it is not a Melissa. sent14: the fact that the polyethylene tools sneak but it is not palatial is not right. sent15: the fact that the polyethylene is not a Melissa hold if it is not a dicloxacillin and it is discomycetous. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a dicloxacillin the fact that it does not tool sneak and is not palatial does not hold. sent17: the fact that that the polyethylene does not tool sneak but it is palatial is true is not true if that it is not a dicloxacillin is right. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a dicloxacillin then that it does not tool sneak and it is palatial is false. sent19: that something is both not a Melissa and not a dicloxacillin is not right if it is not discomycetous. sent20: if the polyethylene is contemptible it is a Melissa. sent21: the damson is not palatial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the polyethylene is not a kind of a dicloxacillin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polyethylene is discomycetous.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the polyethylene is not a dicloxacillin but discomycetous.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the polyethylene is not a kind of a Melissa.; sent20 & sent11 -> int3: the polyethylene is a Melissa.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the polyethylene is not discomycetous.; sent12 -> int6: the fact that the polyethylene does not tool sneak and is not palatial is incorrect if it is non-discomycetous.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the polyethylene does not tool sneak and is not palatial is not right.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: if the polyethylene is not a dicloxacillin then the fact that it does not tool sneak and it is not palatial does not hold.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__