that the kimono is a Gogh but it is not semiotic is not correct if the countertransference does not disabuse tallness.
sent1: if something does not unbrace the fact that it is a Gogh and it is semiotic is not correct. sent2: if the kimono does not unbrace it is a Gogh and it is not semiotic. sent3: the decline is a Gogh. sent4: if that the countertransference is not a Gogh and it is not uncreative does not hold then the kimono does disabuse tallness. sent5: something is not a Carpobrotus and does not hand bolometer if it is not semiotic. sent6: if that the kimono does not unbrace and is not uncreative is not correct then the countertransference does disabuse tallness. sent7: if the kimono is not semiotic then the antimony is not semiotic. sent8: the fact that something is not semiotic is true if the fact that it is a Gogh that does not disabuse tallness is false. sent9: if the fact that the doxazosin is a slum is true then it is a Bierce. sent10: that the kimono is a Gogh and it is semiotic is wrong if the countertransference does not disabuse tallness. sent11: that something is a Gogh that is not semiotic is not wrong if it does not unbrace. sent12: that the kimono is a Gogh and is semiotic is wrong if it does not unbrace. sent13: that the kimono is a kind of a Gogh and it is semiotic is incorrect. sent14: the fact that that the kimono is a Gogh but it does not disabuse tallness is not correct if the countertransference is ungrateful hold. sent15: the countertransference is non-semiotic. sent16: the fact that the curacao is not ruminant and it is not a fornication is false. sent17: the kimono is a Gogh but it is not semiotic if the countertransference does not disabuse tallness. sent18: the kimono is a Gogh that is not semiotic. sent19: if something does not unbrace the fact that it is a Gogh and not semiotic does not hold. sent20: the countertransference disabuses tallness if the kimono is uncreative. sent21: the kimono is not uncreative. sent22: that the kimono does not unbrace but it is uncreative is not true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the kimono does not unbrace and is not uncreative is not true.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the countertransference disabuses tallness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the countertransference does not disabuse tallness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the kimono does not unbrace and is creative.; int3 -> int4: the kimono does not unbrace.; sent19 -> int5: if the kimono does not unbrace that it is a Gogh and is not semiotic does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the kimono is a Gogh and is not semiotic does not hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the antimony is not a Carpobrotus and it does not hand bolometer.
sent5 -> int7: the antimony is not a Carpobrotus and it does not hand bolometer if it is not semiotic.; sent8 -> int8: that the kimono is not semiotic if the fact that the kimono is a Gogh but it does not disabuse tallness is wrong is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = that the kimono is a Gogh but it is not semiotic is not correct if the countertransference does not disabuse tallness. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not unbrace the fact that it is a Gogh and it is semiotic is not correct. sent2: if the kimono does not unbrace it is a Gogh and it is not semiotic. sent3: the decline is a Gogh. sent4: if that the countertransference is not a Gogh and it is not uncreative does not hold then the kimono does disabuse tallness. sent5: something is not a Carpobrotus and does not hand bolometer if it is not semiotic. sent6: if that the kimono does not unbrace and is not uncreative is not correct then the countertransference does disabuse tallness. sent7: if the kimono is not semiotic then the antimony is not semiotic. sent8: the fact that something is not semiotic is true if the fact that it is a Gogh that does not disabuse tallness is false. sent9: if the fact that the doxazosin is a slum is true then it is a Bierce. sent10: that the kimono is a Gogh and it is semiotic is wrong if the countertransference does not disabuse tallness. sent11: that something is a Gogh that is not semiotic is not wrong if it does not unbrace. sent12: that the kimono is a Gogh and is semiotic is wrong if it does not unbrace. sent13: that the kimono is a kind of a Gogh and it is semiotic is incorrect. sent14: the fact that that the kimono is a Gogh but it does not disabuse tallness is not correct if the countertransference is ungrateful hold. sent15: the countertransference is non-semiotic. sent16: the fact that the curacao is not ruminant and it is not a fornication is false. sent17: the kimono is a Gogh but it is not semiotic if the countertransference does not disabuse tallness. sent18: the kimono is a Gogh that is not semiotic. sent19: if something does not unbrace the fact that it is a Gogh and not semiotic does not hold. sent20: the countertransference disabuses tallness if the kimono is uncreative. sent21: the kimono is not uncreative. sent22: that the kimono does not unbrace but it is uncreative is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the kimono does not unbrace and is not uncreative is not true.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the countertransference disabuses tallness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the countertransference does not disabuse tallness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the kimono does not unbrace and is creative.; int3 -> int4: the kimono does not unbrace.; sent19 -> int5: if the kimono does not unbrace that it is a Gogh and is not semiotic does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the kimono is a Gogh and is not semiotic does not hold.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__