the flypaper is a geneticism.
sent1: the gemsbok is carposporic. sent2: the tangency does not mound ounce and it is not literate if it desexualizes misuse. sent3: the fact that the pyralid is a positive and remembers is not right. sent4: the milkcap is positive and it mounds spiritualism. sent5: if the fact that the pyralid does not remember and is a literate does not hold the tangency is not a positive. sent6: the fact that the milkcap is non-carposporic thing that is not a literate is not false if it is a kind of a morale. sent7: if the fact that something does not warble and does not remember is not true it is not a geneticism. sent8: the tangency does desexualize misuse and it is a kind of a morale. sent9: if something does not urticate Philip it does mound pyralid and is a positive. sent10: the milkcap is not a kind of a literate. sent11: the hand-me-down is a warble and remembers. sent12: the fact that something is not a warble and it does not remember is incorrect if it does not urticate Philip. sent13: the pyralid does not urticate Philip if that the milkcap is not carposporic but it does remember is incorrect. sent14: if the hand-me-down remembers then that that the milkcap is non-carposporic and remembers does not hold is true. sent15: that the hand-me-down is carposporic and it does mound pyralid is wrong if something is positive. sent16: the tangency does not metabolize if the pyralid does mound pyralid and/or mounds spiritualism. sent17: that the tangency is a kind of a morale and is a warble does not hold.
sent11 -> int1: the hand-me-down remembers.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the milkcap is not carposporic and remembers is wrong.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the pyralid does not urticate Philip.; sent9 -> int4: if the pyralid does not urticate Philip then it mounds pyralid and it is positive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pyralid does mound pyralid and is positive.; int5 -> int6: the pyralid mounds pyralid.; int6 -> int7: the pyralid does mound pyralid and/or it mounds spiritualism.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: that the tangency does not metabolize is true.; sent8 -> int9: the tangency desexualizes misuse.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the tangency does not mound ounce and is not a literate.; int10 -> int11: the tangency does not mound ounce.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the tangency does not metabolize and it does not mound ounce.;
the flypaper is not a geneticism.
sent7 -> int13: the flypaper is not a geneticism if that it does not warble and does not remember is false.; sent12 -> int14: if the flypaper does not urticate Philip then that it does not warble and does not remember is not correct.; sent4 -> int15: that the milkcap is positive is right.; int15 -> int16: something is a positive.; int16 & sent15 -> int17: the fact that the hand-me-down is not non-carposporic and it mounds pyralid is false.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that that it is carposporic and it mounds pyralid is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the flypaper is a geneticism. ; $context$ = sent1: the gemsbok is carposporic. sent2: the tangency does not mound ounce and it is not literate if it desexualizes misuse. sent3: the fact that the pyralid is a positive and remembers is not right. sent4: the milkcap is positive and it mounds spiritualism. sent5: if the fact that the pyralid does not remember and is a literate does not hold the tangency is not a positive. sent6: the fact that the milkcap is non-carposporic thing that is not a literate is not false if it is a kind of a morale. sent7: if the fact that something does not warble and does not remember is not true it is not a geneticism. sent8: the tangency does desexualize misuse and it is a kind of a morale. sent9: if something does not urticate Philip it does mound pyralid and is a positive. sent10: the milkcap is not a kind of a literate. sent11: the hand-me-down is a warble and remembers. sent12: the fact that something is not a warble and it does not remember is incorrect if it does not urticate Philip. sent13: the pyralid does not urticate Philip if that the milkcap is not carposporic but it does remember is incorrect. sent14: if the hand-me-down remembers then that that the milkcap is non-carposporic and remembers does not hold is true. sent15: that the hand-me-down is carposporic and it does mound pyralid is wrong if something is positive. sent16: the tangency does not metabolize if the pyralid does mound pyralid and/or mounds spiritualism. sent17: that the tangency is a kind of a morale and is a warble does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the hand-me-down remembers.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the milkcap is not carposporic and remembers is wrong.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the pyralid does not urticate Philip.; sent9 -> int4: if the pyralid does not urticate Philip then it mounds pyralid and it is positive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pyralid does mound pyralid and is positive.; int5 -> int6: the pyralid mounds pyralid.; int6 -> int7: the pyralid does mound pyralid and/or it mounds spiritualism.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: that the tangency does not metabolize is true.; sent8 -> int9: the tangency desexualizes misuse.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the tangency does not mound ounce and is not a literate.; int10 -> int11: the tangency does not mound ounce.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the tangency does not metabolize and it does not mound ounce.; __UNKNOWN__