if the economicalness occurs that the saneness does not occur and the miscarrying loon does not occur hold.
sent1: the hearing Aconitum does not occur. sent2: if both the antagonisticness and the impiousness happens the blistering does not occur. sent3: the destabilization does not occur if that both the shying and the Frenchifying potto occurs is not true. sent4: the miscarrying loon does not occur. sent5: the misdeal but not the Mexicanness happens if the abscising does not occur. sent6: if the tripping euro does not occur then that the logisticsness does not occur is right. sent7: if the Frenchifying Nestorianism but not the sociolinguisticsness occurs then the tripping crook does not occur. sent8: the Colombianness does not occur. sent9: that the alterableness and the non-Georgianness happens is not correct. sent10: that the saneness and the miscarrying loon occurs is brought about by that the celioscopy does not occur. sent11: the tripping vulcanization and the tripping crook occurs. sent12: the combination but not the tripping euro occurs. sent13: the villainy does not occur. sent14: the tripping mantrap does not occur and the e-mail does not occur. sent15: the saneness does not occur if the fact that that the abscising occurs and the economicalness happens is not right is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abscising happens and the economicalness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the economicalness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the economicalness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the abscising and the non-economicalness occurs is incorrect.;
the misdealing occurs but the Mexican does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the economicalness occurs that the saneness does not occur and the miscarrying loon does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the hearing Aconitum does not occur. sent2: if both the antagonisticness and the impiousness happens the blistering does not occur. sent3: the destabilization does not occur if that both the shying and the Frenchifying potto occurs is not true. sent4: the miscarrying loon does not occur. sent5: the misdeal but not the Mexicanness happens if the abscising does not occur. sent6: if the tripping euro does not occur then that the logisticsness does not occur is right. sent7: if the Frenchifying Nestorianism but not the sociolinguisticsness occurs then the tripping crook does not occur. sent8: the Colombianness does not occur. sent9: that the alterableness and the non-Georgianness happens is not correct. sent10: that the saneness and the miscarrying loon occurs is brought about by that the celioscopy does not occur. sent11: the tripping vulcanization and the tripping crook occurs. sent12: the combination but not the tripping euro occurs. sent13: the villainy does not occur. sent14: the tripping mantrap does not occur and the e-mail does not occur. sent15: the saneness does not occur if the fact that that the abscising occurs and the economicalness happens is not right is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abscising happens and the economicalness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the economicalness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the economicalness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the abscising and the non-economicalness occurs is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__