that there is something such that if that it dives Etropus is not incorrect then the fact that it is not anapestic and/or it is stearic is wrong is wrong.
sent1: that something either is not a Bombax or is approachable or both is incorrect if it is stearic. sent2: the bunter is not stearic if it does halve butyl. sent3: if the fact that the T-junction does dive Etropus hold then that it is anapestic is correct. sent4: that the Turk's-cap is juridical and/or it is anapestic is false if it is lathery. sent5: there exists something such that if it does halve DC that it is not trabecular and/or it halves autosuggestion is wrong. sent6: if the T-junction does dive Etropus the fact that it either is not anapestic or is stearic or both does not hold.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
that either the butyl is not a Bombax or it is approachable or both does not hold if it is stearic.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it dives Etropus is not incorrect then the fact that it is not anapestic and/or it is stearic is wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that something either is not a Bombax or is approachable or both is incorrect if it is stearic. sent2: the bunter is not stearic if it does halve butyl. sent3: if the fact that the T-junction does dive Etropus hold then that it is anapestic is correct. sent4: that the Turk's-cap is juridical and/or it is anapestic is false if it is lathery. sent5: there exists something such that if it does halve DC that it is not trabecular and/or it halves autosuggestion is wrong. sent6: if the T-junction does dive Etropus the fact that it either is not anapestic or is stearic or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__