the muffle does debrief obloquy.
sent1: that the orchestrator does meow is not wrong if it is calculous. sent2: if the fact that the gem is not a kind of a Buddhist but it is a Colorado is not correct that the fact that it is not a Vanellus is incorrect is not false. sent3: if the gem is manorial the fact that it is not non-Buddhist and not euphonious is not true. sent4: if the orchestrator does not debrief obloquy and is purgatorial the muffle does not debrief obloquy. sent5: if the orchestrator is a meow then the muffle is a Vanellus. sent6: the fact that the gem is purgatorial and it does debrief Scottish is not true. sent7: the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish if it is a Colorado and it is not calculous. sent8: if that the orchestrator is a Colorado that is not calculous is not true then it is a meow. sent9: the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish if that it is a kind of a Colorado that is calculous is right. sent10: something that is a kind of a Buddhist is a Colorado. sent11: if the gem is purgatorial then it is manorial. sent12: if the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish then that the gem is purgatorial and it debrief Scottish is incorrect. sent13: the gem is a Buddhist. sent14: if the orchestrator is a kind of a Colorado it is manorial. sent15: the orchestrator is not calculous. sent16: the gem is not purgatorial if the fact that the barbasco is not purgatorial or it is not manorial or both is not right. sent17: that the orchestrator is a kind of a Colorado and it is calculous does not hold. sent18: the gem is a Colorado. sent19: if the muffle debriefs obloquy then it is purgatorial. sent20: if the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish that the gem is not purgatorial and does debrief Scottish does not hold. sent21: if something is not a kind of a Buddhist then it does not debrief obloquy and debriefs Scottish. sent22: if the fact that the orchestrator does not debrief obloquy and debriefs Scottish is not true the muffle does not debrief obloquy. sent23: the gem is manorial if that it is not purgatorial and does debrief Scottish does not hold. sent24: if something is a Vanellus it debriefs obloquy. sent25: if the orchestrator is not Buddhist or it meows or both that it is not a Buddhist is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orchestrator is a kind of a Colorado but it is not calculous.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: that the gem is a kind of non-purgatorial thing that does debrief Scottish does not hold.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the gem is manorial.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the gem is a kind of a Buddhist but it is not euphonious does not hold.; sent24 -> int5: if the muffle is a Vanellus then it does debrief obloquy.;
the fact that the muffle does not debrief obloquy is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the muffle does debrief obloquy. ; $context$ = sent1: that the orchestrator does meow is not wrong if it is calculous. sent2: if the fact that the gem is not a kind of a Buddhist but it is a Colorado is not correct that the fact that it is not a Vanellus is incorrect is not false. sent3: if the gem is manorial the fact that it is not non-Buddhist and not euphonious is not true. sent4: if the orchestrator does not debrief obloquy and is purgatorial the muffle does not debrief obloquy. sent5: if the orchestrator is a meow then the muffle is a Vanellus. sent6: the fact that the gem is purgatorial and it does debrief Scottish is not true. sent7: the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish if it is a Colorado and it is not calculous. sent8: if that the orchestrator is a Colorado that is not calculous is not true then it is a meow. sent9: the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish if that it is a kind of a Colorado that is calculous is right. sent10: something that is a kind of a Buddhist is a Colorado. sent11: if the gem is purgatorial then it is manorial. sent12: if the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish then that the gem is purgatorial and it debrief Scottish is incorrect. sent13: the gem is a Buddhist. sent14: if the orchestrator is a kind of a Colorado it is manorial. sent15: the orchestrator is not calculous. sent16: the gem is not purgatorial if the fact that the barbasco is not purgatorial or it is not manorial or both is not right. sent17: that the orchestrator is a kind of a Colorado and it is calculous does not hold. sent18: the gem is a Colorado. sent19: if the muffle debriefs obloquy then it is purgatorial. sent20: if the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish that the gem is not purgatorial and does debrief Scottish does not hold. sent21: if something is not a kind of a Buddhist then it does not debrief obloquy and debriefs Scottish. sent22: if the fact that the orchestrator does not debrief obloquy and debriefs Scottish is not true the muffle does not debrief obloquy. sent23: the gem is manorial if that it is not purgatorial and does debrief Scottish does not hold. sent24: if something is a Vanellus it debriefs obloquy. sent25: if the orchestrator is not Buddhist or it meows or both that it is not a Buddhist is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orchestrator is a kind of a Colorado but it is not calculous.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the orchestrator does not debrief Scottish.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: that the gem is a kind of non-purgatorial thing that does debrief Scottish does not hold.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the gem is manorial.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the gem is a kind of a Buddhist but it is not euphonious does not hold.; sent24 -> int5: if the muffle is a Vanellus then it does debrief obloquy.; __UNKNOWN__