the embroidery is a humanity.
sent1: the fact that the embroidery is a kind of reducible thing that is not a turn is wrong if there is something such that it guards avenue. sent2: the juxtaposition is not a representative and it is not a kind of a shuteye. sent3: there exists something such that it does subside cornerstone. sent4: if the scapula is an expulsion then that the harpist does idealize embroidery and is not an expulsion is incorrect. sent5: that the paraldehyde does guard avenue is not wrong if something is unselfish and it is an equalization. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a clothespin is not a A-bomb then it does not overgrow. sent7: if the scapula does not idealize embroidery then the juxtaposition is an equalization and is not an expulsion. sent8: that something is a kind of an equalization if that it idealizes embroidery and it is not an expulsion is incorrect is not incorrect. sent9: if that the battle-ax is a kind of a clothespin that does subside cornerstone is false the fact that it is not a clothespin is not false. sent10: that the harpist is an equalization and is a kind of a humanity is false. sent11: the harpist does subside wop and it queers. sent12: if the battle-ax is not a turn but it is reducible the paraldehyde is a turn. sent13: the harpist is a shuteye and idealizes embroidery. sent14: the battle-ax is unselfish. sent15: if the fact that the embroidery is a kind of reducible thing that is not a kind of an expulsion is not true it does guard avenue. sent16: that the scapula is a kind of a turn that is an expulsion is false. sent17: either something is not a Bonhoeffer or it is not a kind of a Hassel or both if it is a mineralogist. sent18: if something does not overgrow then the fact that it does not turn and it is reducible is right. sent19: if a non-unselfish thing guards avenue the scapula does not idealize embroidery. sent20: if the IVP does not subside cornerstone then the battle-ax is not a clothespin and is not a kind of a A-bomb. sent21: if something is not a kind of a Bonhoeffer then the fact that it does not subside cornerstone is not wrong. sent22: if that something does subside cornerstone and is not a kind of a shuteye is not right then it is not nonrepresentative. sent23: if the fact that something is not a mineralogist and is not a kind of a leaf-roller is not true it is a mineralogist. sent24: the embroidery is not a kind of a humanity if there exists something such that it is a kind of an equalization and it is not an expulsion. sent25: if that that something is reducible but it is not a kind of a turn hold does not hold then that it is a kind of a humanity is not wrong. sent26: the fact that the battle-ax is a clothespin and it subsides cornerstone is not correct. sent27: if the battle-ax is not a kind of a clothespin the harpist overgrows and it is unselfish. sent28: there exists nothing such that it is both not a mineralogist and not a leaf-roller. sent29: the embroidery is a kind of a clothespin.
sent8 -> int1: if that the fact that the harpist idealizes embroidery but it is not a kind of an expulsion is not false is incorrect then the fact that it is an equalization is true.; sent9 & sent26 -> int2: the battle-ax is not a kind of a clothespin.; sent27 & int2 -> int3: the harpist does overgrow and is unselfish.; int3 -> int4: the harpist is unselfish.; sent25 -> int5: if that the embroidery is reducible and does not turn is incorrect the fact that it is a humanity is not false.;
the embroidery is not a humanity.
sent21 -> int6: if the IVP is not a Bonhoeffer then it does not subside cornerstone.; sent17 -> int7: if the parliamentarian is a mineralogist it is not a kind of a Bonhoeffer or it is not a Hassel or both.; sent23 -> int8: the parliamentarian is a mineralogist if that it is not a mineralogist and it is not a leaf-roller does not hold.; sent28 -> int9: that the parliamentarian is both not a mineralogist and not a leaf-roller is not correct.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the parliamentarian is a mineralogist.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the parliamentarian is not a kind of a Bonhoeffer and/or is not a Hassel.; int11 -> int12: everything is not a Bonhoeffer and/or it is not a Hassel.; int12 -> int13: the IVP is not a kind of a Bonhoeffer and/or it is not a Hassel.; sent6 -> int14: if the battle-ax is not a kind of a clothespin and it is not a A-bomb the fact that it does not overgrow is not incorrect.; sent18 -> int15: if the fact that the battle-ax does not overgrow is correct it does not turn and is reducible.;
$hypothesis$ = the embroidery is a humanity. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the embroidery is a kind of reducible thing that is not a turn is wrong if there is something such that it guards avenue. sent2: the juxtaposition is not a representative and it is not a kind of a shuteye. sent3: there exists something such that it does subside cornerstone. sent4: if the scapula is an expulsion then that the harpist does idealize embroidery and is not an expulsion is incorrect. sent5: that the paraldehyde does guard avenue is not wrong if something is unselfish and it is an equalization. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a clothespin is not a A-bomb then it does not overgrow. sent7: if the scapula does not idealize embroidery then the juxtaposition is an equalization and is not an expulsion. sent8: that something is a kind of an equalization if that it idealizes embroidery and it is not an expulsion is incorrect is not incorrect. sent9: if that the battle-ax is a kind of a clothespin that does subside cornerstone is false the fact that it is not a clothespin is not false. sent10: that the harpist is an equalization and is a kind of a humanity is false. sent11: the harpist does subside wop and it queers. sent12: if the battle-ax is not a turn but it is reducible the paraldehyde is a turn. sent13: the harpist is a shuteye and idealizes embroidery. sent14: the battle-ax is unselfish. sent15: if the fact that the embroidery is a kind of reducible thing that is not a kind of an expulsion is not true it does guard avenue. sent16: that the scapula is a kind of a turn that is an expulsion is false. sent17: either something is not a Bonhoeffer or it is not a kind of a Hassel or both if it is a mineralogist. sent18: if something does not overgrow then the fact that it does not turn and it is reducible is right. sent19: if a non-unselfish thing guards avenue the scapula does not idealize embroidery. sent20: if the IVP does not subside cornerstone then the battle-ax is not a clothespin and is not a kind of a A-bomb. sent21: if something is not a kind of a Bonhoeffer then the fact that it does not subside cornerstone is not wrong. sent22: if that something does subside cornerstone and is not a kind of a shuteye is not right then it is not nonrepresentative. sent23: if the fact that something is not a mineralogist and is not a kind of a leaf-roller is not true it is a mineralogist. sent24: the embroidery is not a kind of a humanity if there exists something such that it is a kind of an equalization and it is not an expulsion. sent25: if that that something is reducible but it is not a kind of a turn hold does not hold then that it is a kind of a humanity is not wrong. sent26: the fact that the battle-ax is a clothespin and it subsides cornerstone is not correct. sent27: if the battle-ax is not a kind of a clothespin the harpist overgrows and it is unselfish. sent28: there exists nothing such that it is both not a mineralogist and not a leaf-roller. sent29: the embroidery is a kind of a clothespin. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if that the fact that the harpist idealizes embroidery but it is not a kind of an expulsion is not false is incorrect then the fact that it is an equalization is true.; sent9 & sent26 -> int2: the battle-ax is not a kind of a clothespin.; sent27 & int2 -> int3: the harpist does overgrow and is unselfish.; int3 -> int4: the harpist is unselfish.; sent25 -> int5: if that the embroidery is reducible and does not turn is incorrect the fact that it is a humanity is not false.; __UNKNOWN__