the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not marble Canidae and is not ambitious is not right then it is not an innocent is not wrong.
sent1: the mocha is not innocent if that it does not marble Canidae and is not ambitious does not hold. sent2: if that the dimple is both a blush and not dipterous is not true then it is not nonexplosive. sent3: there is something such that if that it does not marble Canidae and is not ambitious is not right it is an innocent. sent4: there exists something such that if it is ambitious then it is not an innocent. sent5: the fact that the mocha is not innocent hold if it is ambitious. sent6: that something is not innocent is not false if the fact that that it is not nonintellectual and it is non-prosodic is not false does not hold.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
that the foot is non-innocent is true if the fact that it is not nonintellectual and it is not prosodic is incorrect.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it does not marble Canidae and is not ambitious is not right then it is not an innocent is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the mocha is not innocent if that it does not marble Canidae and is not ambitious does not hold. sent2: if that the dimple is both a blush and not dipterous is not true then it is not nonexplosive. sent3: there is something such that if that it does not marble Canidae and is not ambitious is not right it is an innocent. sent4: there exists something such that if it is ambitious then it is not an innocent. sent5: the fact that the mocha is not innocent hold if it is ambitious. sent6: that something is not innocent is not false if the fact that that it is not nonintellectual and it is non-prosodic is not false does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__