the fact that the Tutelo is restrictive thing that does tape is not correct.
sent1: the Tutelo is a kind of a arethusa and is kinetic. sent2: the Tutelo is a LP. sent3: the arbor is a covariation if the burnous is not a kind of a arethusa but it is a kind of a Varanidae. sent4: if something is a arethusa then it is restrictive. sent5: the shrimp is a arethusa. sent6: the fact that the mono-iodotyrosine does cut but it does not reschedule Helodermatidae does not hold. sent7: something is not a cut. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a cut then the Tutelo is a kind of a Varanidae that reschedules Helodermatidae. sent9: the arbor does reschedule Helodermatidae if the fact that the mono-iodotyrosine cuts but it does not reschedule Helodermatidae is not true. sent10: there exists something such that it is not uncut. sent11: something is not a Varanidae if it is not a kind of a taped.
sent11 -> int1: if the Tutelo is not a taped then it is not a Varanidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tutelo is not a kind of a taped.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Tutelo is not a Varanidae.; sent7 & sent8 -> int3: the Tutelo is a Varanidae and reschedules Helodermatidae.; int3 -> int4: the Tutelo is a kind of a Varanidae.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Tutelo is a taped.; sent4 -> int7: if the Tutelo is a arethusa the fact that that it is not restrictive is not right is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int8: the Tutelo is a arethusa.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Tutelo is restrictive.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the arbor is both a taped and a covariation.
sent9 & sent6 -> int10: the arbor does reschedule Helodermatidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Tutelo is restrictive thing that does tape is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tutelo is a kind of a arethusa and is kinetic. sent2: the Tutelo is a LP. sent3: the arbor is a covariation if the burnous is not a kind of a arethusa but it is a kind of a Varanidae. sent4: if something is a arethusa then it is restrictive. sent5: the shrimp is a arethusa. sent6: the fact that the mono-iodotyrosine does cut but it does not reschedule Helodermatidae does not hold. sent7: something is not a cut. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a cut then the Tutelo is a kind of a Varanidae that reschedules Helodermatidae. sent9: the arbor does reschedule Helodermatidae if the fact that the mono-iodotyrosine cuts but it does not reschedule Helodermatidae is not true. sent10: there exists something such that it is not uncut. sent11: something is not a Varanidae if it is not a kind of a taped. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the Tutelo is not a taped then it is not a Varanidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tutelo is not a kind of a taped.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Tutelo is not a Varanidae.; sent7 & sent8 -> int3: the Tutelo is a Varanidae and reschedules Helodermatidae.; int3 -> int4: the Tutelo is a kind of a Varanidae.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Tutelo is a taped.; sent4 -> int7: if the Tutelo is a arethusa the fact that that it is not restrictive is not right is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int8: the Tutelo is a arethusa.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Tutelo is restrictive.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__