that the endive is not a Marine and is cacodylic is not true.
sent1: if there is something such that that it is abolitionary and it does murmur does not hold the galactagogue is not abolitionary. sent2: the airmailer does not murmur if it is a proliferation that does not ding hydromel. sent3: the Bubo is eudemonic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Micronesia and it is not eudemonic is incorrect. sent4: if something is not a kind of a murmuring it is not abolitionary. sent5: the galactagogue is eusporangiate if the sloganeer dings horsecloth. sent6: the endive is not a kind of a Marine. sent7: if something does not ding blustering and it is not cyclopean it dings horsecloth. sent8: the fact that the galactagogue is not eusporangiate is not false if it is perceptible. sent9: if that the galactagogue is not eusporangiate and it does not mean fluency is incorrect the endive is not eusporangiate. sent10: the fact that the sloganeer does not ding blustering but it is cyclopean is not true. sent11: if the Bubo imparts Stendhal then the airmailer is a kind of a proliferation that does not ding hydromel. sent12: the galactagogue is not eusporangiate if that it does not mean fluency and is not perceptible is false. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it dings blustering and it is not cyclopean is not true. sent14: if something is not abolitionary then the fact that it does ding horsecloth and is perceptible is incorrect. sent15: that the galactagogue is not eusporangiate and it does not mean fluency is wrong if the fact that the milkwort does not ding horsecloth hold. sent16: that something does not mean fluency and is not perceptible is wrong if it is not abolitionary. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is abolitionary and it is a murmuring does not hold. sent18: the Bubo does impart Stendhal if it is eudemonic. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it does not ding blustering and it is non-cyclopean is not correct the endive is cacodylic. sent20: the fact that something is not a Marine but it is cacodylic does not hold if it is not eusporangiate.
sent7 -> int1: if the sloganeer does not ding blustering and is not cyclopean then it does ding horsecloth.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sloganeer does not ding blustering and is not cyclopean.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the sloganeer does ding horsecloth hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the galactagogue is eusporangiate.; sent16 -> int4: that the galactagogue does not mean fluency and it is not perceptible is false if it is not abolitionary.; sent17 & sent1 -> int5: the galactagogue is not abolitionary.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the galactagogue does not mean fluency and is not perceptible does not hold.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: that the galactagogue is not eusporangiate hold.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the sloganeer does not ding blustering and it is not cyclopean does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not ding blustering and it is not cyclopean is not correct.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: the endive is cacodylic.; int11 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the endive is not a Marine but it is not non-cacodylic is false.
sent20 -> int12: the fact that the endive is not a Marine but it is cacodylic is wrong if it is not eusporangiate.; sent14 -> int13: if the fact that the airmailer is not abolitionary is true the fact that the fact that it dings horsecloth and it is perceptible is not incorrect is false.; sent4 -> int14: the airmailer is not abolitionary if it is not a murmuring.;
$hypothesis$ = that the endive is not a Marine and is cacodylic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is abolitionary and it does murmur does not hold the galactagogue is not abolitionary. sent2: the airmailer does not murmur if it is a proliferation that does not ding hydromel. sent3: the Bubo is eudemonic if the fact that it is not a kind of a Micronesia and it is not eudemonic is incorrect. sent4: if something is not a kind of a murmuring it is not abolitionary. sent5: the galactagogue is eusporangiate if the sloganeer dings horsecloth. sent6: the endive is not a kind of a Marine. sent7: if something does not ding blustering and it is not cyclopean it dings horsecloth. sent8: the fact that the galactagogue is not eusporangiate is not false if it is perceptible. sent9: if that the galactagogue is not eusporangiate and it does not mean fluency is incorrect the endive is not eusporangiate. sent10: the fact that the sloganeer does not ding blustering but it is cyclopean is not true. sent11: if the Bubo imparts Stendhal then the airmailer is a kind of a proliferation that does not ding hydromel. sent12: the galactagogue is not eusporangiate if that it does not mean fluency and is not perceptible is false. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it dings blustering and it is not cyclopean is not true. sent14: if something is not abolitionary then the fact that it does ding horsecloth and is perceptible is incorrect. sent15: that the galactagogue is not eusporangiate and it does not mean fluency is wrong if the fact that the milkwort does not ding horsecloth hold. sent16: that something does not mean fluency and is not perceptible is wrong if it is not abolitionary. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is abolitionary and it is a murmuring does not hold. sent18: the Bubo does impart Stendhal if it is eudemonic. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it does not ding blustering and it is non-cyclopean is not correct the endive is cacodylic. sent20: the fact that something is not a Marine but it is cacodylic does not hold if it is not eusporangiate. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the sloganeer does not ding blustering and is not cyclopean then it does ding horsecloth.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sloganeer does not ding blustering and is not cyclopean.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the sloganeer does ding horsecloth hold.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the galactagogue is eusporangiate.; sent16 -> int4: that the galactagogue does not mean fluency and it is not perceptible is false if it is not abolitionary.; sent17 & sent1 -> int5: the galactagogue is not abolitionary.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the galactagogue does not mean fluency and is not perceptible does not hold.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: that the galactagogue is not eusporangiate hold.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the sloganeer does not ding blustering and it is not cyclopean does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not ding blustering and it is not cyclopean is not correct.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: the endive is cacodylic.; int11 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__