the raftering tenderizer but not the providence occurs.
sent1: the powwowing Bam is prevented by the slap. sent2: the autographicness but not the auditioning happens. sent3: that the newspapering and the stoichiometricness happens is triggered by that the slapping does not occur. sent4: the raftering tenderizer occurs if the powwowing Bam does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the providence does not occur is not false the raftering tenderizer does not occur or the powwowing Bam does not occur or both. sent6: the powwowing Bam and/or the slapping is caused by that the onrush does not occur. sent7: the raftering tenderizer happens. sent8: if the powwowing Bam does not occur the raftering tenderizer happens but the providence does not occur. sent9: the stoichiometricness happens. sent10: the ultramicroscopicness does not occur. sent11: the nonindustrialness does not occur.
the fact that the raftering tenderizer but not the providence happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the raftering tenderizer but not the providence occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the powwowing Bam is prevented by the slap. sent2: the autographicness but not the auditioning happens. sent3: that the newspapering and the stoichiometricness happens is triggered by that the slapping does not occur. sent4: the raftering tenderizer occurs if the powwowing Bam does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the providence does not occur is not false the raftering tenderizer does not occur or the powwowing Bam does not occur or both. sent6: the powwowing Bam and/or the slapping is caused by that the onrush does not occur. sent7: the raftering tenderizer happens. sent8: if the powwowing Bam does not occur the raftering tenderizer happens but the providence does not occur. sent9: the stoichiometricness happens. sent10: the ultramicroscopicness does not occur. sent11: the nonindustrialness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__