the nonindulgentness happens.
sent1: the cleistogamousness does not occur if both the squash and the heartbeat occurs. sent2: if the fact that the heartbeat occurs and/or the squash does not occur does not hold then the bleat does not occur. sent3: the nidifugousness occurs and the cleistogamousness happens. sent4: the nidifugousness is prevented by that the non-eponymousness and the continuance occurs. sent5: the entrapment does not occur. sent6: the non-insensitiveness is prevented by that the bleat does not occur. sent7: the phylogeneticness occurs if that the non-eponymousness and the continuance happens is wrong. sent8: if the ratcheting Pearmain does not occur then the nonindulgentness happens. sent9: that both the nidifugousness and the non-phylogeneticness happens prevents that the nonindulgentness happens. sent10: the fact that not the ratcheting Pearmain but the bleat occurs is not correct if that the cleistogamousness does not occur hold. sent11: if the entrapment does not occur then that either the heartbeat happens or the squashing does not occur or both does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-eponymousness and the continuance happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the nidifugousness does not occur.; sent3 -> int2: the nidifugousness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that both the non-eponymousness and the continuance happens is wrong.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the phylogeneticness happens.; sent11 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the heartbeat happens and/or the squashing does not occur is not correct.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the bleating does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the insensitiveness occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the phylogeneticness occurs and the insensitiveness happens.;
the nonindulgentness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the nonindulgentness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the cleistogamousness does not occur if both the squash and the heartbeat occurs. sent2: if the fact that the heartbeat occurs and/or the squash does not occur does not hold then the bleat does not occur. sent3: the nidifugousness occurs and the cleistogamousness happens. sent4: the nidifugousness is prevented by that the non-eponymousness and the continuance occurs. sent5: the entrapment does not occur. sent6: the non-insensitiveness is prevented by that the bleat does not occur. sent7: the phylogeneticness occurs if that the non-eponymousness and the continuance happens is wrong. sent8: if the ratcheting Pearmain does not occur then the nonindulgentness happens. sent9: that both the nidifugousness and the non-phylogeneticness happens prevents that the nonindulgentness happens. sent10: the fact that not the ratcheting Pearmain but the bleat occurs is not correct if that the cleistogamousness does not occur hold. sent11: if the entrapment does not occur then that either the heartbeat happens or the squashing does not occur or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-eponymousness and the continuance happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the nidifugousness does not occur.; sent3 -> int2: the nidifugousness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that both the non-eponymousness and the continuance happens is wrong.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the phylogeneticness happens.; sent11 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the heartbeat happens and/or the squashing does not occur is not correct.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the bleating does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the insensitiveness occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the phylogeneticness occurs and the insensitiveness happens.; __UNKNOWN__