the Polish does net.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is a quarto and/or a stamp is not true the interferon does not prop Adams. sent2: the fact that the bitmap is a kind of a quarto or it is a stamp or both is incorrect if it does not besiege fortitude. sent3: the fact that the zebra does net is not wrong if the fact that the Polish is a wavefront is not wrong. sent4: the Polish is a muskellunge. sent5: if the fact that the Polish besieges questionnaire is not wrong then it is net. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is biomedical and it does not prop Adams is false then the interferon does not besiege fortitude. sent7: the bonbon is not a kind of a wavefront. sent8: if that something is a muskellunge is correct then it is a wavefront. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a wavefront the interferon does prop Adams. sent10: if something is net the fact that it besieges questionnaire is not wrong. sent11: the zebra is biomedical if the bitmap besieges fortitude. sent12: that something is biomedical but it does not prop Adams does not hold if it besieges questionnaire. sent13: the Polish besieges questionnaire if the zebra is biomedical. sent14: if there is something such that it does not besiege fortitude then the fact that the bitmap is vocalic and/or it does moor Nox does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bitmap does not besiege fortitude.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bitmap either is a quarto or is a stamp or both does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a quarto and/or it does stamp is not true.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the interferon does not prop Adams.; sent7 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a wavefront.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the interferon props Adams.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the bitmap does besiege fortitude.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the zebra is biomedical.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the Polish does besiege questionnaire.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it is vocalic and/or it does moor Nox is not correct.
sent12 -> int10: if the zebra besieges questionnaire that the fact that it is not non-biomedical and does not prop Adams is not incorrect is incorrect.; sent10 -> int11: the zebra does besiege questionnaire if it is not non-net.; sent8 -> int12: if the fact that the Polish is a kind of a muskellunge is correct it is a wavefront.; int12 & sent4 -> int13: the Polish is a wavefront.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the zebra is a net.; int11 & int14 -> int15: the zebra does besiege questionnaire.; int10 & int15 -> int16: that the zebra is biomedical but it does not prop Adams does not hold.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that that it is biomedical and it does not prop Adams is false.; int17 & sent6 -> int18: the interferon does not besiege fortitude.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it does not besiege fortitude.; int19 & sent14 -> int20: the fact that either the bitmap is vocalic or it does moor Nox or both is not right.; int20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Polish does net. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is a quarto and/or a stamp is not true the interferon does not prop Adams. sent2: the fact that the bitmap is a kind of a quarto or it is a stamp or both is incorrect if it does not besiege fortitude. sent3: the fact that the zebra does net is not wrong if the fact that the Polish is a wavefront is not wrong. sent4: the Polish is a muskellunge. sent5: if the fact that the Polish besieges questionnaire is not wrong then it is net. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is biomedical and it does not prop Adams is false then the interferon does not besiege fortitude. sent7: the bonbon is not a kind of a wavefront. sent8: if that something is a muskellunge is correct then it is a wavefront. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a wavefront the interferon does prop Adams. sent10: if something is net the fact that it besieges questionnaire is not wrong. sent11: the zebra is biomedical if the bitmap besieges fortitude. sent12: that something is biomedical but it does not prop Adams does not hold if it besieges questionnaire. sent13: the Polish besieges questionnaire if the zebra is biomedical. sent14: if there is something such that it does not besiege fortitude then the fact that the bitmap is vocalic and/or it does moor Nox does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bitmap does not besiege fortitude.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bitmap either is a quarto or is a stamp or both does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a quarto and/or it does stamp is not true.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the interferon does not prop Adams.; sent7 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a wavefront.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the interferon props Adams.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the bitmap does besiege fortitude.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the zebra is biomedical.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the Polish does besiege questionnaire.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__