that if the incomprehensibleness occurs the hashing peach does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the aerobicsness occurs. sent2: the reporting occurs. sent3: the thermography leads to that the reporting occurs. sent4: the reporting happens and the exhibition occurs. sent5: the fluff happens. sent6: that the fluff does not occur is prevented by that the hashing peach does not occur and the exhibition does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the confederating Aras occurs and the avellanness occurs does not hold the confederating Aras does not occur. sent8: if the confederating Aras does not occur then either the Pacific occurs or the pause does not occur or both. sent9: if the pausing does not occur the balleticness does not occur. sent10: if the peronealness does not occur the according punchboard occurs and the thermography occurs. sent11: the exhibition does not occur if the incomprehensibleness occurs and the hashing peach happens. sent12: the twit does not occur. sent13: that the windstorm happens results in that the bane occurs but the charity does not occur. sent14: that the charity does not occur and the balleticness does not occur prevents that the peronealness happens. sent15: that the balleticness does not occur hold if the Pacific occurs. sent16: the Carolineness does not occur. sent17: the fact that the confederating Aras and the avellanness happens is wrong. sent18: the Solomonicness occurs and the incomprehensibleness happens if the unenthusiasticness does not occur. sent19: that the unenthusiasticness happens is prevented by the stealth and/or the non-unenthusiasticness. sent20: the windstorm occurs and the Japanese happens if the twit does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the incomprehensibleness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hashing peach occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the incomprehensibleness and the hashing peach occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the exhibition does not occur is not wrong.; sent4 -> int3: the exhibition happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the hashing peach does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
both the fluff and the Solomonicness happens.
sent20 & sent12 -> int6: the windstorm and the Japanese happens.; int6 -> int7: the windstorm occurs.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the bane occurs but the charity does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the charity does not occur.; sent7 & sent17 -> int10: the fact that the confederating Aras does not occur is not wrong.; sent8 & int10 -> int11: the Pacific happens and/or the pausing does not occur.; int11 & sent15 & sent9 -> int12: the balleticness does not occur.; int9 & int12 -> int13: the charity does not occur and the balleticness does not occur.; sent14 & int13 -> int14: the peronealness does not occur.; sent10 & int14 -> int15: both the according punchboard and the thermography happens.; int15 -> int16: the thermography occurs.; sent3 & int16 -> int17: the reporting occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the incomprehensibleness occurs the hashing peach does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the aerobicsness occurs. sent2: the reporting occurs. sent3: the thermography leads to that the reporting occurs. sent4: the reporting happens and the exhibition occurs. sent5: the fluff happens. sent6: that the fluff does not occur is prevented by that the hashing peach does not occur and the exhibition does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the confederating Aras occurs and the avellanness occurs does not hold the confederating Aras does not occur. sent8: if the confederating Aras does not occur then either the Pacific occurs or the pause does not occur or both. sent9: if the pausing does not occur the balleticness does not occur. sent10: if the peronealness does not occur the according punchboard occurs and the thermography occurs. sent11: the exhibition does not occur if the incomprehensibleness occurs and the hashing peach happens. sent12: the twit does not occur. sent13: that the windstorm happens results in that the bane occurs but the charity does not occur. sent14: that the charity does not occur and the balleticness does not occur prevents that the peronealness happens. sent15: that the balleticness does not occur hold if the Pacific occurs. sent16: the Carolineness does not occur. sent17: the fact that the confederating Aras and the avellanness happens is wrong. sent18: the Solomonicness occurs and the incomprehensibleness happens if the unenthusiasticness does not occur. sent19: that the unenthusiasticness happens is prevented by the stealth and/or the non-unenthusiasticness. sent20: the windstorm occurs and the Japanese happens if the twit does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the incomprehensibleness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hashing peach occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the incomprehensibleness and the hashing peach occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the exhibition does not occur is not wrong.; sent4 -> int3: the exhibition happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the hashing peach does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__