the bregma is not stainable.
sent1: if the wagtail does not gutter caffeinism and it is not a expectedness then it does taste Heidegger. sent2: The wagtail does not truss cockatoo. sent3: either something is a expectedness or it does truss wagtail or both if it does not taste Heidegger. sent4: the cockatoo is not a HF if the fact that the bergamot is not a netting and/or is a HF is incorrect. sent5: the cockatoo does not truss wagtail. sent6: the cockatoo does truss wagtail if it is a expectedness. sent7: the bregma is stainable if the fact that the wagtail is a HF is correct. sent8: if the cockatoo is a kind of a expectedness or it is not a HF or both the fact that the bregma is not a kind of a expectedness is right. sent9: if that the cockatoo is a kind of a HF that does not gutter caffeinism is not true it does not taste Heidegger. sent10: something is a kind of a HF if that it tastes Heidegger is not incorrect. sent11: the wagtail is not a netting if that it is a redbelly and it does not truss Gonne is not true. sent12: something is stainable thing that does gutter caffeinism if it is not a netting. sent13: if the cockatoo is not a expectedness the wagtail does not gutter caffeinism and it is not a expectedness. sent14: if something is not a expectedness but it trusses wagtail the fact that it is not stainable is right. sent15: that if something gutters caffeinism the fact that the cockatoo is a HF but it does not gutters caffeinism is incorrect is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cockatoo is a kind of a expectedness.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the cockatoo does truss wagtail.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the cockatoo is not a expectedness.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the wagtail does not gutter caffeinism and it is not a expectedness.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the wagtail tastes Heidegger.; sent10 -> int6: if the wagtail tastes Heidegger it is a HF.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the wagtail is a kind of a HF.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the corset does truss wagtail.
sent3 -> int8: the cockatoo is a expectedness or trusses wagtail or both if it does not taste Heidegger.; sent12 -> int9: that the wagtail is stainable and it gutters caffeinism is not false if it does not net.;
$hypothesis$ = the bregma is not stainable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wagtail does not gutter caffeinism and it is not a expectedness then it does taste Heidegger. sent2: The wagtail does not truss cockatoo. sent3: either something is a expectedness or it does truss wagtail or both if it does not taste Heidegger. sent4: the cockatoo is not a HF if the fact that the bergamot is not a netting and/or is a HF is incorrect. sent5: the cockatoo does not truss wagtail. sent6: the cockatoo does truss wagtail if it is a expectedness. sent7: the bregma is stainable if the fact that the wagtail is a HF is correct. sent8: if the cockatoo is a kind of a expectedness or it is not a HF or both the fact that the bregma is not a kind of a expectedness is right. sent9: if that the cockatoo is a kind of a HF that does not gutter caffeinism is not true it does not taste Heidegger. sent10: something is a kind of a HF if that it tastes Heidegger is not incorrect. sent11: the wagtail is not a netting if that it is a redbelly and it does not truss Gonne is not true. sent12: something is stainable thing that does gutter caffeinism if it is not a netting. sent13: if the cockatoo is not a expectedness the wagtail does not gutter caffeinism and it is not a expectedness. sent14: if something is not a expectedness but it trusses wagtail the fact that it is not stainable is right. sent15: that if something gutters caffeinism the fact that the cockatoo is a HF but it does not gutters caffeinism is incorrect is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cockatoo is a kind of a expectedness.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the cockatoo does truss wagtail.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the cockatoo is not a expectedness.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the wagtail does not gutter caffeinism and it is not a expectedness.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the wagtail tastes Heidegger.; sent10 -> int6: if the wagtail tastes Heidegger it is a HF.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the wagtail is a kind of a HF.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__