the squaretail is not a Spitsbergen.
sent1: something geysers cadenced if the fact that it does not geysers cadenced and it is not an adulterer is false. sent2: the EDTA does not talc waw if the promethazine is a kind of an adulterer. sent3: the Democrat is not a tactlessness and it is not a sod. sent4: if something is not a tactlessness and it is not a sod then the copper charges. sent5: the ascot does not geyser cadenced if something that is a hackee does not flicker squaretail. sent6: that the copper is a kind of a church-state is true if it is a kind of a charge. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not geyser cadenced the copper is not a church-state and it is not a method. sent8: if the EDTA does not talc waw the squaretail is not a Spitsbergen.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the promethazine is a kind of a hackee that does not flicker squaretail.; assump1 -> int1: something is a hackee and does not flicker squaretail.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the ascot does not geyser cadenced.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it does not geyser cadenced.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the copper is not a church-state and it is not a method.; int4 -> int5: the copper is not a church-state.; sent3 -> int6: something is not a tactlessness and does not sod.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the copper does charge.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the copper is a church-state.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the promethazine is a hackee but it does not flicker squaretail does not hold.;
the squaretail is a kind of a Spitsbergen.
sent1 -> int11: the copper does geyser cadenced if the fact that it does not geyser cadenced and is not an adulterer is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the squaretail is not a Spitsbergen. ; $context$ = sent1: something geysers cadenced if the fact that it does not geysers cadenced and it is not an adulterer is false. sent2: the EDTA does not talc waw if the promethazine is a kind of an adulterer. sent3: the Democrat is not a tactlessness and it is not a sod. sent4: if something is not a tactlessness and it is not a sod then the copper charges. sent5: the ascot does not geyser cadenced if something that is a hackee does not flicker squaretail. sent6: that the copper is a kind of a church-state is true if it is a kind of a charge. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not geyser cadenced the copper is not a church-state and it is not a method. sent8: if the EDTA does not talc waw the squaretail is not a Spitsbergen. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the promethazine is a kind of a hackee that does not flicker squaretail.; assump1 -> int1: something is a hackee and does not flicker squaretail.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the ascot does not geyser cadenced.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it does not geyser cadenced.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the copper is not a church-state and it is not a method.; int4 -> int5: the copper is not a church-state.; sent3 -> int6: something is not a tactlessness and does not sod.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the copper does charge.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the copper is a church-state.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the promethazine is a hackee but it does not flicker squaretail does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__