the newsreel does discountenance Cryptobranchus.
sent1: that something is a androecium that does not discountenance Micah hold. sent2: if the boxer is not an oolong but an occupation then the manure is not a kind of an oolong. sent3: the newsreel does not discountenance Cryptobranchus if that the lithographer does not discountenance Micah and does not discountenance immutability is not wrong. sent4: the manure is a historicism if the lithographer does not discountenance Micah and is a kind of an oolong. sent5: the lithographer does not discountenance immutability if the manure is not an oolong. sent6: the newsreel does discountenance Micah. sent7: if the boxer is impermanent and it is a syconium the newsreel is a kind of a androecium. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it awes Borodino and is not a magnificence is incorrect. sent9: if that something does not dissemble and it does not latch demonstration is not correct then it is a syconium. sent10: the villus is not impermanent. sent11: the newsreel does not discountenance Cryptobranchus if that the lithographer does not discountenance Cryptobranchus and does not discountenance Micah is not correct. sent12: the newsreel is a historicism. sent13: if there is something such that it does not dissemble then the boxer does discountenance Cryptobranchus. sent14: that the manure is not a kind of a historicism and does discountenance Micah is wrong. sent15: the boxer is an occupation if the manure is a kind of a historicism. sent16: there exists something such that that it discountenances immutability hold. sent17: if something does not discountenance immutability the fact that it does not discountenance Cryptobranchus and does not discountenance Micah is wrong. sent18: the fact that the newsreel dissembles but it does not latch demonstration does not hold if the boxer does not dissembles. sent19: the boxer is impermanent if there is something such that that it is a androecium that is not impermanent is not true. sent20: the boxer does discountenance Micah. sent21: that if something is a syconium then it does discountenance Cryptobranchus is not false. sent22: something that is not a historicism is not an oolong and is a kind of an occupation. sent23: the fact that the newsreel does not dissemble and it does not latch demonstration is not right if that the boxer does not dissemble is true. sent24: if something discountenances immutability the lithographer does not discountenance Micah but it is an oolong. sent25: the fact that the villus is both a androecium and not impermanent is not right.
sent16 & sent24 -> int1: the lithographer does not discountenance Micah but it is an oolong.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the manure is a historicism is not wrong.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the boxer is an occupation.; sent25 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a androecium and it is not impermanent is not right.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the boxer is impermanent.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the boxer is an occupation and is impermanent.; sent9 -> int7: if that the fact that the newsreel does not dissemble and it does not latch demonstration does not hold hold it is a syconium.; sent21 -> int8: the newsreel does discountenance Cryptobranchus if it is a syconium.;
the newsreel does not discountenance Cryptobranchus.
$hypothesis$ = the newsreel does discountenance Cryptobranchus. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a androecium that does not discountenance Micah hold. sent2: if the boxer is not an oolong but an occupation then the manure is not a kind of an oolong. sent3: the newsreel does not discountenance Cryptobranchus if that the lithographer does not discountenance Micah and does not discountenance immutability is not wrong. sent4: the manure is a historicism if the lithographer does not discountenance Micah and is a kind of an oolong. sent5: the lithographer does not discountenance immutability if the manure is not an oolong. sent6: the newsreel does discountenance Micah. sent7: if the boxer is impermanent and it is a syconium the newsreel is a kind of a androecium. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it awes Borodino and is not a magnificence is incorrect. sent9: if that something does not dissemble and it does not latch demonstration is not correct then it is a syconium. sent10: the villus is not impermanent. sent11: the newsreel does not discountenance Cryptobranchus if that the lithographer does not discountenance Cryptobranchus and does not discountenance Micah is not correct. sent12: the newsreel is a historicism. sent13: if there is something such that it does not dissemble then the boxer does discountenance Cryptobranchus. sent14: that the manure is not a kind of a historicism and does discountenance Micah is wrong. sent15: the boxer is an occupation if the manure is a kind of a historicism. sent16: there exists something such that that it discountenances immutability hold. sent17: if something does not discountenance immutability the fact that it does not discountenance Cryptobranchus and does not discountenance Micah is wrong. sent18: the fact that the newsreel dissembles but it does not latch demonstration does not hold if the boxer does not dissembles. sent19: the boxer is impermanent if there is something such that that it is a androecium that is not impermanent is not true. sent20: the boxer does discountenance Micah. sent21: that if something is a syconium then it does discountenance Cryptobranchus is not false. sent22: something that is not a historicism is not an oolong and is a kind of an occupation. sent23: the fact that the newsreel does not dissemble and it does not latch demonstration is not right if that the boxer does not dissemble is true. sent24: if something discountenances immutability the lithographer does not discountenance Micah but it is an oolong. sent25: the fact that the villus is both a androecium and not impermanent is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent24 -> int1: the lithographer does not discountenance Micah but it is an oolong.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the manure is a historicism is not wrong.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the boxer is an occupation.; sent25 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a androecium and it is not impermanent is not right.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the boxer is impermanent.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the boxer is an occupation and is impermanent.; sent9 -> int7: if that the fact that the newsreel does not dissemble and it does not latch demonstration does not hold hold it is a syconium.; sent21 -> int8: the newsreel does discountenance Cryptobranchus if it is a syconium.; __UNKNOWN__