the clomiphene does not lash.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not neuralgic and it peregrinates is false. sent2: if something does not harshen healthfulness or it is a Isis or both then it is carcinogenic. sent3: the clomiphene does lash if there is something such that it does not resort. sent4: the cymbalist does broil. sent5: if the hackee does not peregrinate then it is not a kind of a Annelida and it is not micaceous. sent6: the fact that something does not harshen healthfulness and is a kind of a lash is not correct if it is not a Isis. sent7: that the hackee is not a Annelida if the ghoul is not micaceous but it does harshen healthfulness is correct. sent8: the cymbalist does not coordinate Shona if the fact that it does broil hold. sent9: if the cymbalist does not coordinate Shona it buffets. sent10: if the hackee is not a Annelida the cymbalist does not peregrinate. sent11: if the meerschaum is not a kind of a Isis the fact that it is both neuralgic and a resort is false. sent12: something does buffet if it does not coordinate Shona. sent13: if there is something such that that it is neuralgic thing that is a kind of a resort is not right then that the clomiphene does lash hold. sent14: something is neuralgic and is a resort. sent15: the ghoul is not a Annelida. sent16: the ghoul harshens healthfulness if there exists something such that it is a Isis. sent17: if something does not coordinate Shona then it does buffet and it peregrinates. sent18: the ghoul harshens healthfulness. sent19: the cymbalist does buffet. sent20: if there exists something such that it peregrinates the ghoul is not a Annelida. sent21: the ghoul is not micaceous but it does harshen healthfulness if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Isis. sent22: there exists something such that it peregrinates.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the meerschaum is a kind of a Isis is correct.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a Isis hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the ghoul is not micaceous but it harshens healthfulness.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the hackee is not a Annelida.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the cymbalist does not peregrinate.; sent17 -> int5: the cymbalist does buffet and does peregrinate if it does not coordinate Shona.; sent8 & sent4 -> int6: the cymbalist does not coordinate Shona.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cymbalist is a buffet and does peregrinate.; int7 -> int8: the cymbalist does peregrinate.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the meerschaum is not a Isis is true.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: that the meerschaum is neuralgic and it is a resort is not true.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is neuralgic and a resort does not hold.; int12 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the clomiphene does not lash.
sent6 -> int13: the fact that the ghoul does not harshen healthfulness but it is a kind of a lash is not true if it is not a Isis.;
$hypothesis$ = the clomiphene does not lash. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not neuralgic and it peregrinates is false. sent2: if something does not harshen healthfulness or it is a Isis or both then it is carcinogenic. sent3: the clomiphene does lash if there is something such that it does not resort. sent4: the cymbalist does broil. sent5: if the hackee does not peregrinate then it is not a kind of a Annelida and it is not micaceous. sent6: the fact that something does not harshen healthfulness and is a kind of a lash is not correct if it is not a Isis. sent7: that the hackee is not a Annelida if the ghoul is not micaceous but it does harshen healthfulness is correct. sent8: the cymbalist does not coordinate Shona if the fact that it does broil hold. sent9: if the cymbalist does not coordinate Shona it buffets. sent10: if the hackee is not a Annelida the cymbalist does not peregrinate. sent11: if the meerschaum is not a kind of a Isis the fact that it is both neuralgic and a resort is false. sent12: something does buffet if it does not coordinate Shona. sent13: if there is something such that that it is neuralgic thing that is a kind of a resort is not right then that the clomiphene does lash hold. sent14: something is neuralgic and is a resort. sent15: the ghoul is not a Annelida. sent16: the ghoul harshens healthfulness if there exists something such that it is a Isis. sent17: if something does not coordinate Shona then it does buffet and it peregrinates. sent18: the ghoul harshens healthfulness. sent19: the cymbalist does buffet. sent20: if there exists something such that it peregrinates the ghoul is not a Annelida. sent21: the ghoul is not micaceous but it does harshen healthfulness if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Isis. sent22: there exists something such that it peregrinates. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the meerschaum is a kind of a Isis is correct.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a Isis hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the ghoul is not micaceous but it harshens healthfulness.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the hackee is not a Annelida.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the cymbalist does not peregrinate.; sent17 -> int5: the cymbalist does buffet and does peregrinate if it does not coordinate Shona.; sent8 & sent4 -> int6: the cymbalist does not coordinate Shona.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cymbalist is a buffet and does peregrinate.; int7 -> int8: the cymbalist does peregrinate.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the meerschaum is not a Isis is true.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: that the meerschaum is neuralgic and it is a resort is not true.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is neuralgic and a resort does not hold.; int12 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__