there is something such that if the fact that it is a palatine is true it is not a marshmallow but vinaceous.
sent1: the multiflora does not rap checkers if that it is a kind of a elaphure and it is not nonparticulate is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it clings then it is a kind of a deckle and it raps bribe. sent3: that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a palatine it is vinaceous is not incorrect. sent4: something is both not a marshmallow and vinaceous if that it is not unshaven hold. sent5: that if that the kerosene is not unshaven is right the kerosene is not non-vinaceous is true. sent6: the kerosene is non-palatine if it is not a elaphure. sent7: if that something is vinaceous but it is not a kind of a Tipulidae is false then it is not vinaceous. sent8: the kerosene is a kind of a marshmallow and it is vinaceous if it is not unshaven. sent9: that the kerosene is the marshmallow if the fact that the kerosene does rap econometrician hold hold. sent10: if the fact that something is not vinaceous is correct then that it is a palatine and it is a kind of a marshmallow is wrong. sent11: the kerosene is a marshmallow and vinaceous. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a palatine then it is not a kind of a marshmallow. sent13: the kerosene is caryophyllaceous.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the kerosene is a elaphure and not unshaven is not right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kerosene is a kind of a palatine.; sent4 -> int1: the kerosene is not a kind of a marshmallow but it is vinaceous if it is not unshaven.;
the kerosene is not a waste.
sent10 -> int2: if that the analgesic is not vinaceous is right then the fact that it is a palatine and it is a kind of a marshmallow is wrong.; sent7 -> int3: the analgesic is not vinaceous if that it is a kind of vinaceous thing that is not a Tipulidae is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is a palatine is true it is not a marshmallow but vinaceous. ; $context$ = sent1: the multiflora does not rap checkers if that it is a kind of a elaphure and it is not nonparticulate is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it clings then it is a kind of a deckle and it raps bribe. sent3: that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a palatine it is vinaceous is not incorrect. sent4: something is both not a marshmallow and vinaceous if that it is not unshaven hold. sent5: that if that the kerosene is not unshaven is right the kerosene is not non-vinaceous is true. sent6: the kerosene is non-palatine if it is not a elaphure. sent7: if that something is vinaceous but it is not a kind of a Tipulidae is false then it is not vinaceous. sent8: the kerosene is a kind of a marshmallow and it is vinaceous if it is not unshaven. sent9: that the kerosene is the marshmallow if the fact that the kerosene does rap econometrician hold hold. sent10: if the fact that something is not vinaceous is correct then that it is a palatine and it is a kind of a marshmallow is wrong. sent11: the kerosene is a marshmallow and vinaceous. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a palatine then it is not a kind of a marshmallow. sent13: the kerosene is caryophyllaceous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the kerosene is a elaphure and not unshaven is not right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kerosene is a kind of a palatine.; sent4 -> int1: the kerosene is not a kind of a marshmallow but it is vinaceous if it is not unshaven.; __UNKNOWN__