the saponification is not Dionysian.
sent1: if something is not carcinogenic and it is not a neglect then it is not a kind of a clip. sent2: if a carcinogenic thing is not a neglect then it does not clip. sent3: the saponification does not measure maltha if there exists something such that that it does not deposit curie and is a waking is incorrect. sent4: something measures boycott and is not a kind of a clip if that it does not measure maltha is not false. sent5: the cyme does not measure seriousness and it does not deposit curie. sent6: everything does not measure seriousness. sent7: if there is something such that that it does not trundle bible and is not a waking is not true the cyme waking. sent8: the saponification is non-carcinogenic and it is not a neglect if it is Dionysian. sent9: if the saponification does measure boycott the mascot measures maltha. sent10: the fact that the cyme is a kind of a waking but it does not deposit curie does not hold if the mascot measures maltha. sent11: if something is not a clip that it does measure boycott is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saponification is Dionysian.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the saponification is not carcinogenic and is not a kind of a neglect.; sent1 -> int2: the saponification does not clip if it is not carcinogenic and it is not a neglect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the saponification is not a kind of a clip.; sent11 -> int4: if that the saponification is not a kind of a clip is true it does measure boycott.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the saponification does measure boycott.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the mascot measures maltha.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the cyme is a waking but it does not deposit curie is not correct.; sent5 -> int8: the cyme does not deposit curie.;
the saponification is not non-Dionysian.
sent6 -> int9: the fact that the cyme does not measure seriousness is right.; sent4 -> int10: the saponification does measure boycott but it is not a clip if it does not measure maltha.;
$hypothesis$ = the saponification is not Dionysian. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not carcinogenic and it is not a neglect then it is not a kind of a clip. sent2: if a carcinogenic thing is not a neglect then it does not clip. sent3: the saponification does not measure maltha if there exists something such that that it does not deposit curie and is a waking is incorrect. sent4: something measures boycott and is not a kind of a clip if that it does not measure maltha is not false. sent5: the cyme does not measure seriousness and it does not deposit curie. sent6: everything does not measure seriousness. sent7: if there is something such that that it does not trundle bible and is not a waking is not true the cyme waking. sent8: the saponification is non-carcinogenic and it is not a neglect if it is Dionysian. sent9: if the saponification does measure boycott the mascot measures maltha. sent10: the fact that the cyme is a kind of a waking but it does not deposit curie does not hold if the mascot measures maltha. sent11: if something is not a clip that it does measure boycott is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saponification is Dionysian.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the saponification is not carcinogenic and is not a kind of a neglect.; sent1 -> int2: the saponification does not clip if it is not carcinogenic and it is not a neglect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the saponification is not a kind of a clip.; sent11 -> int4: if that the saponification is not a kind of a clip is true it does measure boycott.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the saponification does measure boycott.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the mascot measures maltha.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the cyme is a waking but it does not deposit curie is not correct.; sent5 -> int8: the cyme does not deposit curie.; __UNKNOWN__