that the fact that the dimming and the non-sectionalness happens is not correct if the de-escalation does not occur is not correct.
sent1: if the foreshock happens then the fact that the mildness happens and the signing undernourishment does not occur is not true. sent2: that the companying praetorship does not occur causes that the clearing adeptness but not the overkill occurs. sent3: that both the erection and the non-axiomaticness happens does not hold. sent4: the de-escalation occurs if the dimness happens and the sectional does not occur. sent5: the fact that the fact that the nonslipperiness but not the luging happens does not hold is not false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the dimming and the non-sectionalness occurs.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the de-escalation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the de-escalation does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the dimness and the non-sectionalness happens is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the dimming and the non-sectionalness happens is not correct if the de-escalation does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the foreshock happens then the fact that the mildness happens and the signing undernourishment does not occur is not true. sent2: that the companying praetorship does not occur causes that the clearing adeptness but not the overkill occurs. sent3: that both the erection and the non-axiomaticness happens does not hold. sent4: the de-escalation occurs if the dimness happens and the sectional does not occur. sent5: the fact that the fact that the nonslipperiness but not the luging happens does not hold is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the dimming and the non-sectionalness occurs.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the de-escalation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the de-escalation does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the dimness and the non-sectionalness happens is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__