there exists something such that if it does sparkle spic and it does sparkle bonobo it does not investigate mincemeat.
sent1: if something is a kind of a stupid and is obstetric it does not sparkle spic. sent2: there is something such that if it investigates White and it is a Czech then it is adenocarcinomatous. sent3: something that sparkles spic and does sparkle bonobo does not investigate mincemeat. sent4: if the saran investigates mincemeat and it is a threescore it does not sparkle pronucleus. sent5: if something that is a hake is lucky it is not a consumptive. sent6: there is something such that if it is a Latin that does sparkle pythium it is a kind of a consumptive. sent7: if the White is a kind of a servant that shreds it does sparkle bonobo. sent8: if a fossorial thing does compact Cocteau then it does not investigate mincemeat. sent9: if something does flex and it seeds it is not unequal. sent10: that the chaff sparkles spic is not false if it is an eightieth that does investigate Nitrobacter. sent11: the spic does not quibble if it does sparkle dell and is a nook. sent12: if the saran sparkles spic and it does sparkle bonobo it investigates mincemeat. sent13: something investigates mincemeat if it sparkles spic and sparkles bonobo. sent14: there exists something such that if it sparkles spic and sparkles bonobo it investigates mincemeat. sent15: there is something such that if it investigates immovability and it is armless it is not proteinaceous.
sent3 -> int1: if the saran does sparkle spic and it sparkles bonobo it does not investigate mincemeat.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the wallpaper is fossorial and it compacts Cocteau the fact that it does not investigate mincemeat hold.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does sparkle spic and it does sparkle bonobo it does not investigate mincemeat. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a stupid and is obstetric it does not sparkle spic. sent2: there is something such that if it investigates White and it is a Czech then it is adenocarcinomatous. sent3: something that sparkles spic and does sparkle bonobo does not investigate mincemeat. sent4: if the saran investigates mincemeat and it is a threescore it does not sparkle pronucleus. sent5: if something that is a hake is lucky it is not a consumptive. sent6: there is something such that if it is a Latin that does sparkle pythium it is a kind of a consumptive. sent7: if the White is a kind of a servant that shreds it does sparkle bonobo. sent8: if a fossorial thing does compact Cocteau then it does not investigate mincemeat. sent9: if something does flex and it seeds it is not unequal. sent10: that the chaff sparkles spic is not false if it is an eightieth that does investigate Nitrobacter. sent11: the spic does not quibble if it does sparkle dell and is a nook. sent12: if the saran sparkles spic and it does sparkle bonobo it investigates mincemeat. sent13: something investigates mincemeat if it sparkles spic and sparkles bonobo. sent14: there exists something such that if it sparkles spic and sparkles bonobo it investigates mincemeat. sent15: there is something such that if it investigates immovability and it is armless it is not proteinaceous. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the saran does sparkle spic and it sparkles bonobo it does not investigate mincemeat.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__