the hindquarter resects Britisher.
sent1: there exists something such that that it resects adjuster and is bolometric is false. sent2: the Britisher is bolometric. sent3: the Britisher is a kind of a checkers. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is not bolometric is true the adjuster is not inappropriate. sent5: if something is a daycare but it is not inappropriate then it does resect Britisher. sent6: that the hindquarter is a daycare and not inappropriate hold if the adjuster is not a daycare. sent7: something is not bolometric if it does not resect Britisher and it is not a kind of a daycare.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Britisher resects adjuster but it is not bolometric.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Britisher is not bolometric is true.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Britisher does resect adjuster but it is not bolometric is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it resects adjuster and is not bolometric is not true.; sent5 -> int5: the hindquarter resects Britisher if it is a daycare and it is not inappropriate.;
the fact that the Britisher is not inappropriate is true.
sent7 -> int6: if the fact that the hindquarter does not resect Britisher and is not a daycare hold then it is not bolometric.;
$hypothesis$ = the hindquarter resects Britisher. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it resects adjuster and is bolometric is false. sent2: the Britisher is bolometric. sent3: the Britisher is a kind of a checkers. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is not bolometric is true the adjuster is not inappropriate. sent5: if something is a daycare but it is not inappropriate then it does resect Britisher. sent6: that the hindquarter is a daycare and not inappropriate hold if the adjuster is not a daycare. sent7: something is not bolometric if it does not resect Britisher and it is not a kind of a daycare. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Britisher resects adjuster but it is not bolometric.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Britisher is not bolometric is true.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Britisher does resect adjuster but it is not bolometric is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it resects adjuster and is not bolometric is not true.; sent5 -> int5: the hindquarter resects Britisher if it is a daycare and it is not inappropriate.; __UNKNOWN__