that the anestheticness does not occur but the sink happens prevents the linguisticness.
sent1: the fact that the implantation occurs is true if the habit does not occur. sent2: the mudslide occurs. sent3: the ostealness does not occur if the fact that not the danger but the ostealness happens is not right. sent4: if the determining Tereshkova but not the nonprofit happens then the producer occurs. sent5: if the dogmatizing salmonid does not occur but the trafficking crushing happens then the fulling happens. sent6: the humbuging does not occur. sent7: that the non-anestheticness and the sinking happens is not right if the nonprofit occurs. sent8: the fact that not the viviparousness but the casualty occurs is not right. sent9: the conscientiousness occurs. sent10: that the non-mutationalness and the beep happens is incorrect. sent11: both the orthodonticsness and the dogmatizing polyhedron happens. sent12: the descent happens. sent13: the fact that both the determining Tereshkova and the pursing ptyalin occurs is not wrong if the beep does not occur. sent14: if that the zapping does not occur and the chylificness happens is not true then the chylificness does not occur. sent15: the nonlinguisticness is caused by that the dogmatizing Flodden occurs and the producer happens. sent16: if the dogmatizing polyhedron occurs the dogmatizing Flodden occurs. sent17: the Hindustani happens and the macrencephalicness happens. sent18: if the dogmatizing Guinevere and the determining leeward happens then the attenuation does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonprofit happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-anestheticness and the sinking happens is incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the anestheticness but the sink occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the nonprofit does not occur.; sent11 -> int4: the dogmatizing polyhedron happens.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the dogmatizing Flodden occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that the anestheticness does not occur but the sink happens prevents the linguisticness. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the implantation occurs is true if the habit does not occur. sent2: the mudslide occurs. sent3: the ostealness does not occur if the fact that not the danger but the ostealness happens is not right. sent4: if the determining Tereshkova but not the nonprofit happens then the producer occurs. sent5: if the dogmatizing salmonid does not occur but the trafficking crushing happens then the fulling happens. sent6: the humbuging does not occur. sent7: that the non-anestheticness and the sinking happens is not right if the nonprofit occurs. sent8: the fact that not the viviparousness but the casualty occurs is not right. sent9: the conscientiousness occurs. sent10: that the non-mutationalness and the beep happens is incorrect. sent11: both the orthodonticsness and the dogmatizing polyhedron happens. sent12: the descent happens. sent13: the fact that both the determining Tereshkova and the pursing ptyalin occurs is not wrong if the beep does not occur. sent14: if that the zapping does not occur and the chylificness happens is not true then the chylificness does not occur. sent15: the nonlinguisticness is caused by that the dogmatizing Flodden occurs and the producer happens. sent16: if the dogmatizing polyhedron occurs the dogmatizing Flodden occurs. sent17: the Hindustani happens and the macrencephalicness happens. sent18: if the dogmatizing Guinevere and the determining leeward happens then the attenuation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonprofit happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-anestheticness and the sinking happens is incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the anestheticness but the sink occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the nonprofit does not occur.; sent11 -> int4: the dogmatizing polyhedron happens.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the dogmatizing Flodden occurs.; __UNKNOWN__