that that the eutherianness does not occur but the uneagerness happens does not hold is not false.
sent1: if the impromptu does not occur then the eutherianness does not occur. sent2: both the minstreling grandiosity and the advent occurs. sent3: the representationalness prevents that the purse occurs. sent4: the expiring Whitman does not occur. sent5: the colloguing drollery occurs and the conductiveness occurs. sent6: both the getaway and the conforming occurs. sent7: the completeness occurs. sent8: the disruption does not occur. sent9: the monocotyledonousness does not occur. sent10: if the minstreling grandiosity happens then the sacerdotalness happens. sent11: the collision does not occur. sent12: the fact that the representationalness happens and the typographicness occurs is wrong. sent13: the purse does not occur if that the representationalness does not occur and the typographicness occurs is not correct. sent14: if that not the registration but the expiring queue occurs is false the colloguing charley-horse does not occur. sent15: if the minstreling Vaughan happens then that the representationalness occurs and the typographicness happens is not correct. sent16: that the federalization does not occur is prevented by the conductiveness. sent17: that the pursing occurs is brought about by that the condensate does not occur and the disruption does not occur. sent18: the fact that the minstreling Vaughan happens is not incorrect. sent19: if the condensate and the federalization happens that the impromptu does not occur is right. sent20: the fact that that the representationalness does not occur but the typographicness happens is correct is not correct if the minstreling Vaughan happens. sent21: if both the curacy and the submersion happens then the fact that the ambulating does not occur is true. sent22: if the completing happens the uneagerness occurs. sent23: the colloguing drollery occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the condensate does not occur.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the condensate does not occur and the disruption does not occur.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the purse happens.; sent20 & sent18 -> int3: that both the non-representationalness and the typographicness occurs is not right.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the purse does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the condensate happens.; sent5 -> int7: the conductiveness occurs.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the federalization occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the condensate and the federalization happens.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: the impromptu does not occur.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the eutherianness does not occur.; sent22 & sent7 -> int12: the uneagerness occurs.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
that both the non-eutherianness and the uneagerness happens is false.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the eutherianness does not occur but the uneagerness happens does not hold is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the impromptu does not occur then the eutherianness does not occur. sent2: both the minstreling grandiosity and the advent occurs. sent3: the representationalness prevents that the purse occurs. sent4: the expiring Whitman does not occur. sent5: the colloguing drollery occurs and the conductiveness occurs. sent6: both the getaway and the conforming occurs. sent7: the completeness occurs. sent8: the disruption does not occur. sent9: the monocotyledonousness does not occur. sent10: if the minstreling grandiosity happens then the sacerdotalness happens. sent11: the collision does not occur. sent12: the fact that the representationalness happens and the typographicness occurs is wrong. sent13: the purse does not occur if that the representationalness does not occur and the typographicness occurs is not correct. sent14: if that not the registration but the expiring queue occurs is false the colloguing charley-horse does not occur. sent15: if the minstreling Vaughan happens then that the representationalness occurs and the typographicness happens is not correct. sent16: that the federalization does not occur is prevented by the conductiveness. sent17: that the pursing occurs is brought about by that the condensate does not occur and the disruption does not occur. sent18: the fact that the minstreling Vaughan happens is not incorrect. sent19: if the condensate and the federalization happens that the impromptu does not occur is right. sent20: the fact that that the representationalness does not occur but the typographicness happens is correct is not correct if the minstreling Vaughan happens. sent21: if both the curacy and the submersion happens then the fact that the ambulating does not occur is true. sent22: if the completing happens the uneagerness occurs. sent23: the colloguing drollery occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the condensate does not occur.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the condensate does not occur and the disruption does not occur.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the purse happens.; sent20 & sent18 -> int3: that both the non-representationalness and the typographicness occurs is not right.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: the purse does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the condensate happens.; sent5 -> int7: the conductiveness occurs.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the federalization occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the condensate and the federalization happens.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: the impromptu does not occur.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the eutherianness does not occur.; sent22 & sent7 -> int12: the uneagerness occurs.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__