the kawaka is not a Chuang-tzu.
sent1: the shrike is not a Chuang-tzu. sent2: there is something such that it is not a narrator. sent3: if something is Bantoid but it is not a surface then it is not a kind of a glibness. sent4: the pasture is a Citroncirus and it is incidental. sent5: if the pasture is tangible thing that is a Citroncirus it does not risk manned. sent6: everything is not a kind of a mentalism. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a narrator the pasture is tangible. sent8: if the shrike is not a mentalism the kawaka is not a mentalism. sent9: everything is not glomerular. sent10: the storeroom does stable parody and is not a copper if the pasture does not risk manned. sent11: the kawaka is not a Chuang-tzu if it does vouch and it is a mentalism. sent12: the kawaka vouches and is not a mentalism if the shrike is not a mentalism. sent13: if that the Spode is not a mentalism and is not a Chuang-tzu does not hold then the kawaka is a kind of a Chuang-tzu. sent14: if something that does vouch is not a kind of a mentalism then it is not a Chuang-tzu. sent15: if something is a Simenon but it is not a gather that it is sociobiologic is wrong.
sent6 -> int1: the shrike is not a mentalism.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the kawaka does vouch and is not a mentalism.; sent14 -> int3: the kawaka is not a kind of a Chuang-tzu if it does vouch and it is not a kind of a mentalism.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the kawaka is a Chuang-tzu is not false.
sent2 & sent7 -> int4: the pasture is tangible.; sent4 -> int5: the pasture is a Citroncirus.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the pasture is not a kind of an intangible but it is a kind of a Citroncirus is not incorrect.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the pasture does not risk manned.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the storeroom does stable parody and does not copper.; int8 -> int9: the storeroom is not a kind of a copper.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it does not copper.;
$hypothesis$ = the kawaka is not a Chuang-tzu. ; $context$ = sent1: the shrike is not a Chuang-tzu. sent2: there is something such that it is not a narrator. sent3: if something is Bantoid but it is not a surface then it is not a kind of a glibness. sent4: the pasture is a Citroncirus and it is incidental. sent5: if the pasture is tangible thing that is a Citroncirus it does not risk manned. sent6: everything is not a kind of a mentalism. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a narrator the pasture is tangible. sent8: if the shrike is not a mentalism the kawaka is not a mentalism. sent9: everything is not glomerular. sent10: the storeroom does stable parody and is not a copper if the pasture does not risk manned. sent11: the kawaka is not a Chuang-tzu if it does vouch and it is a mentalism. sent12: the kawaka vouches and is not a mentalism if the shrike is not a mentalism. sent13: if that the Spode is not a mentalism and is not a Chuang-tzu does not hold then the kawaka is a kind of a Chuang-tzu. sent14: if something that does vouch is not a kind of a mentalism then it is not a Chuang-tzu. sent15: if something is a Simenon but it is not a gather that it is sociobiologic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the shrike is not a mentalism.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the kawaka does vouch and is not a mentalism.; sent14 -> int3: the kawaka is not a kind of a Chuang-tzu if it does vouch and it is not a kind of a mentalism.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__