there is something such that if it dies the fact that it is cretaceous and it is not an extent is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that that the usherette is a kind of cretaceous thing that is a kind of a Finnish is not correct is not false if it is ascensional. sent2: the fact that the person is both an extent and not expressible is true if it is a kind of a merman. sent3: that there exists something such that if it is profound that it is a kind of awake thing that carjacks Azerbaijani does not hold hold. sent4: the fact that something dies but it is not full-time does not hold if it is a baby. sent5: if something does segregate mebibit the fact that it is not non-beneficiary but a toastrack does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is suppurative then that it is nonabsorbent and not binucleate is incorrect. sent7: if the tetrodotoxin is a kind of a die the fact that it is cretaceous and it is a kind of an extent is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it does die then that it is cretaceous and an extent is wrong.
the fact that the reeve is both a die and not full-time does not hold if it is a kind of a baby.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it dies the fact that it is cretaceous and it is not an extent is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the usherette is a kind of cretaceous thing that is a kind of a Finnish is not correct is not false if it is ascensional. sent2: the fact that the person is both an extent and not expressible is true if it is a kind of a merman. sent3: that there exists something such that if it is profound that it is a kind of awake thing that carjacks Azerbaijani does not hold hold. sent4: the fact that something dies but it is not full-time does not hold if it is a baby. sent5: if something does segregate mebibit the fact that it is not non-beneficiary but a toastrack does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is suppurative then that it is nonabsorbent and not binucleate is incorrect. sent7: if the tetrodotoxin is a kind of a die the fact that it is cretaceous and it is a kind of an extent is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it does die then that it is cretaceous and an extent is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__