the crossing occurs.
sent1: if the segmenting does not occur the fact that the sophisticating roadhouse and the draping battlesight occurs does not hold. sent2: that the draping battlesight does not occur hold if the fact that both the sophisticating roadhouse and the draping battlesight happens is incorrect. sent3: the advance happens. sent4: the lacustrineness does not occur. sent5: if the coveting does not occur the fact that the achromaticness and the lacustrineness happens is not true. sent6: that the rewriting Crucifixion does not occur is prevented by that the motoring occurs. sent7: if the jolly happens then the crossing occurs. sent8: the achromaticness results in the rewriting Crucifixion. sent9: if the ornamenting does not occur then either the endocentricness happens or the variolarness occurs or both. sent10: the Lao does not occur. sent11: the breaker and the photoconductiveness occurs if the draping battlesight does not occur. sent12: the nurturance does not occur. sent13: that the crossing but not the jolly happens is wrong if the Laoness happens. sent14: that the Lao does not occur and the jolly does not occur prevents that the rewriting Crucifixion happens. sent15: the segmenting does not occur. sent16: that the photoconductiveness occurs results in that the coveting does not occur and the atmosphere does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jolly does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Lao does not occur and the jolly does not occur is not wrong.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the rewriting Crucifixion does not occur.;
the crossing does not occur.
sent1 & sent15 -> int3: that that both the sophisticating roadhouse and the draping battlesight happens hold is not true.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the draping battlesight does not occur.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the breaker happens and the photoconductiveness happens.; int5 -> int6: the photoconductiveness occurs.; sent16 & int6 -> int7: the coveting does not occur and the atmosphere does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the coveting does not occur.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: that the achromaticness and the lacustrineness happens is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the crossing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the segmenting does not occur the fact that the sophisticating roadhouse and the draping battlesight occurs does not hold. sent2: that the draping battlesight does not occur hold if the fact that both the sophisticating roadhouse and the draping battlesight happens is incorrect. sent3: the advance happens. sent4: the lacustrineness does not occur. sent5: if the coveting does not occur the fact that the achromaticness and the lacustrineness happens is not true. sent6: that the rewriting Crucifixion does not occur is prevented by that the motoring occurs. sent7: if the jolly happens then the crossing occurs. sent8: the achromaticness results in the rewriting Crucifixion. sent9: if the ornamenting does not occur then either the endocentricness happens or the variolarness occurs or both. sent10: the Lao does not occur. sent11: the breaker and the photoconductiveness occurs if the draping battlesight does not occur. sent12: the nurturance does not occur. sent13: that the crossing but not the jolly happens is wrong if the Laoness happens. sent14: that the Lao does not occur and the jolly does not occur prevents that the rewriting Crucifixion happens. sent15: the segmenting does not occur. sent16: that the photoconductiveness occurs results in that the coveting does not occur and the atmosphere does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jolly does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Lao does not occur and the jolly does not occur is not wrong.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the rewriting Crucifixion does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__