if the sustentacularness happens then the dilating flophouse does not occur and the healing ratline does not occur.
sent1: that the novelization happens triggers the non-minimalness. sent2: the minimalness does not occur. sent3: the hypothermicness does not occur. sent4: the healing ratline does not occur and the minimalness does not occur if the novelization happens. sent5: that the sustentacularness does not occur is not incorrect if the equitableness happens and the dilating flophouse occurs. sent6: the elucidation happens. sent7: the novelization and the elucidation occurs. sent8: the equitableness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dilating flophouse occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the equitableness and the dilating flophouse happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the sustentacularness does not occur is true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sustentacularness occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dilating flophouse does not occur.; sent7 -> int5: the novelization occurs.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the healing ratline does not occur and the minimalness does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the healing ratline does not occur.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the dilating flophouse does not occur and the healing ratline does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the sustentacularness happens then the dilating flophouse does not occur and the healing ratline does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the novelization happens triggers the non-minimalness. sent2: the minimalness does not occur. sent3: the hypothermicness does not occur. sent4: the healing ratline does not occur and the minimalness does not occur if the novelization happens. sent5: that the sustentacularness does not occur is not incorrect if the equitableness happens and the dilating flophouse occurs. sent6: the elucidation happens. sent7: the novelization and the elucidation occurs. sent8: the equitableness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dilating flophouse occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the equitableness and the dilating flophouse happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the sustentacularness does not occur is true.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the sustentacularness occurs.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dilating flophouse does not occur.; sent7 -> int5: the novelization occurs.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the healing ratline does not occur and the minimalness does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the healing ratline does not occur.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the dilating flophouse does not occur and the healing ratline does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__