that the cacodyl is not a poverty or a chest or both is not correct.
sent1: something is a kind of a latest. sent2: the fact that either something is not a kind of a Kendall or it is latest or both is incorrect if it is a kind of a poverty. sent3: if there is something such that it is latest the snakefly is not a poverty. sent4: if the snakefly is a chest the jack-in-the-pulpit is a kind of a chest. sent5: if something is a kind of a chest then it is a poverty. sent6: if the snakefly is not a poverty then the fact that the cacodyl is not a kind of a poverty and/or it is a chest does not hold.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the snakefly is not a poverty.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;
that the jack-in-the-pulpit is not a Kendall and/or is a latest does not hold.
sent2 -> int2: that the jack-in-the-pulpit either is not a Kendall or is latest or both is not true if it is a poverty.; sent5 -> int3: the jack-in-the-pulpit is a poverty if it is a chest.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cacodyl is not a poverty or a chest or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a latest. sent2: the fact that either something is not a kind of a Kendall or it is latest or both is incorrect if it is a kind of a poverty. sent3: if there is something such that it is latest the snakefly is not a poverty. sent4: if the snakefly is a chest the jack-in-the-pulpit is a kind of a chest. sent5: if something is a kind of a chest then it is a poverty. sent6: if the snakefly is not a poverty then the fact that the cacodyl is not a kind of a poverty and/or it is a chest does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the snakefly is not a poverty.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__