that the tillage happens hold.
sent1: the shutout happens. sent2: the heroic does not occur. sent3: if the ratcheting epigenesis does not occur then the fact that the reluctance occurs and the brisking happens is not true. sent4: the nonpayment happens. sent5: the preying spirituality happens. sent6: the reluctance results in the tillage. sent7: that both the preying spirituality and the preying birdfeeder happens is caused by that the nonpayment does not occur. sent8: the Ruritanianness happens. sent9: if the brisking does not occur the reluctance happens. sent10: the turning occurs. sent11: if both the preying spirituality and the nonpayment happens the brisking does not occur.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the preying spirituality and the nonpayment occurs.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the brisking does not occur.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the reluctance occurs.; sent6 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the tillage does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the tillage happens hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the shutout happens. sent2: the heroic does not occur. sent3: if the ratcheting epigenesis does not occur then the fact that the reluctance occurs and the brisking happens is not true. sent4: the nonpayment happens. sent5: the preying spirituality happens. sent6: the reluctance results in the tillage. sent7: that both the preying spirituality and the preying birdfeeder happens is caused by that the nonpayment does not occur. sent8: the Ruritanianness happens. sent9: if the brisking does not occur the reluctance happens. sent10: the turning occurs. sent11: if both the preying spirituality and the nonpayment happens the brisking does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the preying spirituality and the nonpayment occurs.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the brisking does not occur.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the reluctance occurs.; sent6 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__