the salpingectomy occurs.
sent1: the recidivism happens if the packaging occurs. sent2: the fact that the jumbling Purkinje and the contraction happens is not correct. sent3: if the personifying dideoxyinosine does not occur then the non-philanthropicness and/or the orbitalness occurs. sent4: the interlocking Blennius occurs if the tensileness happens. sent5: if the non-philanthropicness and/or the orbitalness occurs the philanthropicness does not occur. sent6: that the braying and the tremoring happens yields that the jumbling andante does not occur. sent7: the coma occurs. sent8: the centromericness does not occur. sent9: the personifying dideoxyinosine does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the communicating happens hold both the non-tensileness and the jumbling andante happens. sent11: the fact that the salpingectomy occurs is not false if the interlocking Blennius does not occur and the tensileness does not occur. sent12: the Britonness occurs. sent13: if that the interlocking Blennius occurs hold the fact that the tremoring occurs hold. sent14: the tensileness happens. sent15: the personifying tourniquet happens if the attending occurs. sent16: if the bray does not occur then that not the jumbling Purkinje but the contraction happens does not hold. sent17: if the philanthropicness does not occur that the centromericness happens and the coma does not occur is false. sent18: the salpingectomy does not occur if the jumbling Purkinje happens. sent19: both the communicating and the prelacy happens if the interlocking Novial does not occur. sent20: the jumbling andante happens if the pneumaticsness occurs. sent21: if that not the jumbling Purkinje but the contraction happens does not hold the salpingectomy does not occur. sent22: the pneumaticsness occurs if the coma but not the centromericness occurs. sent23: that the jumbling Purkinje and the contraction occurs is incorrect if the braying does not occur.
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the interlocking Blennius occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the tremoring happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bray occurs is correct.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the braying and the tremor occurs.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the jumbling andante does not occur.; sent7 & sent8 -> int5: the coma but not the centromericness occurs.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the pneumaticsness happens.; sent20 & int6 -> int7: the jumbling andante happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the braying does not occur is not wrong.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the fact that not the jumbling Purkinje but the contraction happens is false.; int10 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the salpingectomy occurs.
sent3 & sent9 -> int11: the philanthropicness does not occur and/or the orbitalness happens.; sent5 & int11 -> int12: the philanthropicness does not occur.; sent17 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the fact that the centromericness but not the coma happens is wrong is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the salpingectomy occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the recidivism happens if the packaging occurs. sent2: the fact that the jumbling Purkinje and the contraction happens is not correct. sent3: if the personifying dideoxyinosine does not occur then the non-philanthropicness and/or the orbitalness occurs. sent4: the interlocking Blennius occurs if the tensileness happens. sent5: if the non-philanthropicness and/or the orbitalness occurs the philanthropicness does not occur. sent6: that the braying and the tremoring happens yields that the jumbling andante does not occur. sent7: the coma occurs. sent8: the centromericness does not occur. sent9: the personifying dideoxyinosine does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the communicating happens hold both the non-tensileness and the jumbling andante happens. sent11: the fact that the salpingectomy occurs is not false if the interlocking Blennius does not occur and the tensileness does not occur. sent12: the Britonness occurs. sent13: if that the interlocking Blennius occurs hold the fact that the tremoring occurs hold. sent14: the tensileness happens. sent15: the personifying tourniquet happens if the attending occurs. sent16: if the bray does not occur then that not the jumbling Purkinje but the contraction happens does not hold. sent17: if the philanthropicness does not occur that the centromericness happens and the coma does not occur is false. sent18: the salpingectomy does not occur if the jumbling Purkinje happens. sent19: both the communicating and the prelacy happens if the interlocking Novial does not occur. sent20: the jumbling andante happens if the pneumaticsness occurs. sent21: if that not the jumbling Purkinje but the contraction happens does not hold the salpingectomy does not occur. sent22: the pneumaticsness occurs if the coma but not the centromericness occurs. sent23: that the jumbling Purkinje and the contraction occurs is incorrect if the braying does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the interlocking Blennius occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the tremoring happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bray occurs is correct.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the braying and the tremor occurs.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the jumbling andante does not occur.; sent7 & sent8 -> int5: the coma but not the centromericness occurs.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the pneumaticsness happens.; sent20 & int6 -> int7: the jumbling andante happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the braying does not occur is not wrong.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the fact that not the jumbling Purkinje but the contraction happens is false.; int10 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__