the bottlenose is not megaloblastic.
sent1: if something is a kind of a twit the fact that the lounge is a titanosaur and it does expatriate is wrong. sent2: the cord is inattentive if it is a twit. sent3: if the cord is not a knockoff the bottlenose is megaloblastic. sent4: there exists something such that it does not expatriate. sent5: if that the lounge is not a twit hold then either the cord is not a twit or it is not a knockoff or both. sent6: if that something is a kind of attentive thing that is megaloblastic does not hold then the fact that it is not megaloblastic is right. sent7: if something does not expatriate the fact that it is both not inattentive and not non-megaloblastic is not true. sent8: the fact that the lounge is not attentive and it is not a titanosaur does not hold if there is something such that it does not expatriate. sent9: if that something is not attentive and not a titanosaur is not correct it is not a twit. sent10: the fact that the bottlenose is megaloblastic is correct if the cord is not a twit. sent11: the cord is a twit if the fact that the BR is not a kind of a knockoff and it is not a kind of a twit does not hold.
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: that the lounge is a kind of inattentive thing that is not a kind of a titanosaur does not hold.; sent9 -> int2: the lounge is not a twit if the fact that it is both not attentive and not a titanosaur does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lounge is not a twit.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: either the cord is not a kind of a twit or it is not a knockoff or both.; int4 & sent10 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the bottlenose is not megaloblastic.
sent6 -> int5: if that the bottlenose is attentive and it is megaloblastic is false that it is not megaloblastic hold.; sent7 -> int6: if the bottlenose does not expatriate the fact that it is attentive and megaloblastic is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the bottlenose is not megaloblastic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a twit the fact that the lounge is a titanosaur and it does expatriate is wrong. sent2: the cord is inattentive if it is a twit. sent3: if the cord is not a knockoff the bottlenose is megaloblastic. sent4: there exists something such that it does not expatriate. sent5: if that the lounge is not a twit hold then either the cord is not a twit or it is not a knockoff or both. sent6: if that something is a kind of attentive thing that is megaloblastic does not hold then the fact that it is not megaloblastic is right. sent7: if something does not expatriate the fact that it is both not inattentive and not non-megaloblastic is not true. sent8: the fact that the lounge is not attentive and it is not a titanosaur does not hold if there is something such that it does not expatriate. sent9: if that something is not attentive and not a titanosaur is not correct it is not a twit. sent10: the fact that the bottlenose is megaloblastic is correct if the cord is not a twit. sent11: the cord is a twit if the fact that the BR is not a kind of a knockoff and it is not a kind of a twit does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: that the lounge is a kind of inattentive thing that is not a kind of a titanosaur does not hold.; sent9 -> int2: the lounge is not a twit if the fact that it is both not attentive and not a titanosaur does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lounge is not a twit.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: either the cord is not a kind of a twit or it is not a knockoff or both.; int4 & sent10 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__