the fact that the protractor does push butterscotch and is not a diabolatry is wrong.
sent1: the izar is not a kind of a chemisorption. sent2: that if that the falls does straighten izar hold then that the protractor does push butterscotch but it is not a kind of a diabolatry does not hold is right. sent3: the falls is not tragic if it melds and does straighten Oryctolagus. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it straightens Oryctolagus and is not a buckwheat is incorrect the fact that the Republican is not a kind of a blast is not incorrect. sent5: something is not Moravian but it does straighten izar if that it is not tragic hold. sent6: the Republican is a kind of a stomach. sent7: the falls does meld if there exists something such that it is not apostolic and it is not a chemisorption. sent8: if the Republican is a stomach then it is a blast.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the falls does straighten Oryctolagus but it is not a kind of a buckwheat does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that the fact that it does straighten Oryctolagus and it is not a buckwheat hold is incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Republican is not a blast.; sent8 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the Republican does blast is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the falls does straighten Oryctolagus and is not a buckwheat.; int5 -> int6: that the falls does straighten Oryctolagus is not false.; sent5 -> int7: if the falls is not tragic it is non-Moravian and it does straighten izar.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the protractor does push butterscotch and is not a diabolatry is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the izar is not a kind of a chemisorption. sent2: that if that the falls does straighten izar hold then that the protractor does push butterscotch but it is not a kind of a diabolatry does not hold is right. sent3: the falls is not tragic if it melds and does straighten Oryctolagus. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it straightens Oryctolagus and is not a buckwheat is incorrect the fact that the Republican is not a kind of a blast is not incorrect. sent5: something is not Moravian but it does straighten izar if that it is not tragic hold. sent6: the Republican is a kind of a stomach. sent7: the falls does meld if there exists something such that it is not apostolic and it is not a chemisorption. sent8: if the Republican is a stomach then it is a blast. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the falls does straighten Oryctolagus but it is not a kind of a buckwheat does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that the fact that it does straighten Oryctolagus and it is not a buckwheat hold is incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Republican is not a blast.; sent8 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the Republican does blast is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the falls does straighten Oryctolagus and is not a buckwheat.; int5 -> int6: that the falls does straighten Oryctolagus is not false.; sent5 -> int7: if the falls is not tragic it is non-Moravian and it does straighten izar.; __UNKNOWN__