that the subtopia is a kind of a Dirac and/or it is revivalistic does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the subtopia does enslave laziness and/or it is a crowding does not hold. sent2: if the restaurant is both astronomic and fungicidal then it does not bead kilovolt-ampere. sent3: something is not a Dirac if it does not bead kilovolt-ampere. sent4: the subtopia does not bead kilovolt-ampere if it is a kind of an oscillator and it is a warehouser. sent5: the dean is a warehouser if that that the shift is not a Caporetto and is not a warehouser is not correct is not wrong. sent6: that the subtopia is a European and/or it stonewalls is not true. sent7: if that the fact that the dean does not bead kilovolt-ampere but it is a kind of an oscillator is correct does not hold that the subtopia is not an oscillator is not incorrect. sent8: the Louvre is not a kind of a typography if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a ceruse and it is latter does not hold. sent9: something is both a Caporetto and not a salsa if it is a kind of an abolition. sent10: if the shift is a warehouser then the fact that the dean does not bead kilovolt-ampere but it is an oscillator does not hold. sent11: the shift is an abolition if the plastid is both not an abolition and not intertribal. sent12: the ohmmeter is a corundom. sent13: the subtopia is not a kind of a Dirac if it does not bead kilovolt-ampere. sent14: the subtopia is not a Dirac. sent15: if the plastid does bead kilovolt-ampere the fact that the shift is not a Caporetto and it is not a kind of a warehouser is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the sylvanite does ice Polyangium and/or it is not a Latvian is false if there exists something such that it is a corundom. sent17: if something is a Caporetto and is not a salsa it is a warehouser. sent18: the fact that something is both not a ceruse and latter does not hold if it is a Cachi. sent19: if the fact that the sylvanite does ice Polyangium and/or it is not a kind of a Latvian is wrong the fauna does not ice Polyangium. sent20: that something is a Dirac and/or revivalistic is incorrect if it does not bead kilovolt-ampere. sent21: that the kolkhoznik is not an oscillator is not incorrect. sent22: if that the fauna does not ice Polyangium is right then the telepathist is a Cachi and it does enslave Louvre. sent23: the fact that the subtopia is a warehouser is true. sent24: the subtopia is an oscillator.
sent24 & sent23 -> int1: the subtopia is a kind of an oscillator that is a warehouser.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the subtopia does not bead kilovolt-ampere.; sent20 -> int3: if the subtopia does not bead kilovolt-ampere then that it is either a Dirac or revivalistic or both is not true.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
either the subtopia is a kind of a Dirac or it is revivalistic or both.
sent17 -> int4: the shift is a kind of a warehouser if it is a Caporetto that is not a kind of a salsa.; sent9 -> int5: if the shift is an abolition then it is both a Caporetto and not a salsa.; sent18 -> int6: the fact that that the telepathist is not a ceruse but it is a latter is not incorrect is not correct if it is a Cachi.; sent12 -> int7: there is something such that it is a kind of a corundom.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the fact that the sylvanite does ice Polyangium or it is not a Latvian or both does not hold.; sent19 & int8 -> int9: the fauna does not ice Polyangium.; sent22 & int9 -> int10: the telepathist is a Cachi and enslaves Louvre.; int10 -> int11: the telepathist is a Cachi.; int6 & int11 -> int12: that the telepathist is not a ceruse but it is a latter is wrong.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is not a ceruse and it is a latter is wrong.; int13 & sent8 -> int14: the Louvre is not a typography.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it is not a typography.;
$hypothesis$ = that the subtopia is a kind of a Dirac and/or it is revivalistic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the subtopia does enslave laziness and/or it is a crowding does not hold. sent2: if the restaurant is both astronomic and fungicidal then it does not bead kilovolt-ampere. sent3: something is not a Dirac if it does not bead kilovolt-ampere. sent4: the subtopia does not bead kilovolt-ampere if it is a kind of an oscillator and it is a warehouser. sent5: the dean is a warehouser if that that the shift is not a Caporetto and is not a warehouser is not correct is not wrong. sent6: that the subtopia is a European and/or it stonewalls is not true. sent7: if that the fact that the dean does not bead kilovolt-ampere but it is a kind of an oscillator is correct does not hold that the subtopia is not an oscillator is not incorrect. sent8: the Louvre is not a kind of a typography if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a ceruse and it is latter does not hold. sent9: something is both a Caporetto and not a salsa if it is a kind of an abolition. sent10: if the shift is a warehouser then the fact that the dean does not bead kilovolt-ampere but it is an oscillator does not hold. sent11: the shift is an abolition if the plastid is both not an abolition and not intertribal. sent12: the ohmmeter is a corundom. sent13: the subtopia is not a kind of a Dirac if it does not bead kilovolt-ampere. sent14: the subtopia is not a Dirac. sent15: if the plastid does bead kilovolt-ampere the fact that the shift is not a Caporetto and it is not a kind of a warehouser is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the sylvanite does ice Polyangium and/or it is not a Latvian is false if there exists something such that it is a corundom. sent17: if something is a Caporetto and is not a salsa it is a warehouser. sent18: the fact that something is both not a ceruse and latter does not hold if it is a Cachi. sent19: if the fact that the sylvanite does ice Polyangium and/or it is not a kind of a Latvian is wrong the fauna does not ice Polyangium. sent20: that something is a Dirac and/or revivalistic is incorrect if it does not bead kilovolt-ampere. sent21: that the kolkhoznik is not an oscillator is not incorrect. sent22: if that the fauna does not ice Polyangium is right then the telepathist is a Cachi and it does enslave Louvre. sent23: the fact that the subtopia is a warehouser is true. sent24: the subtopia is an oscillator. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent23 -> int1: the subtopia is a kind of an oscillator that is a warehouser.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the subtopia does not bead kilovolt-ampere.; sent20 -> int3: if the subtopia does not bead kilovolt-ampere then that it is either a Dirac or revivalistic or both is not true.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__