the jingoism but not the mystifying AMP happens.
sent1: the integrating bean occurs if the fact that the disjoining but not the integrating bean occurs is false. sent2: if that the intenseness does not occur and the attributiveness does not occur is wrong then the legatoness happens. sent3: the thunderbolt occurs or the education does not occur or both if the condensate does not occur. sent4: if the legatoness does not occur then that the jingoism happens and the mystifying AMP does not occur is not right. sent5: if the instrumenting limewater does not occur the bidirectionalness happens and the unmilitariness happens. sent6: that the integrating bean does not occur is triggered by that the legatoness and the mystifying AMP happens. sent7: if the thunderbolt occurs then the fact that the overburdening nest does not occur is not false. sent8: if the legatoness does not occur the mystifying AMP but not the pulverization happens. sent9: the non-intenseness leads to that the indication does not occur and the mystifying Aertex does not occur. sent10: that the epiphysealness does not occur and the instrumenting limewater does not occur if that the mystifying Aertex does not occur is correct hold. sent11: the intenseness does not occur if that both the intenseness and the non-attributiveness happens is not true. sent12: if the overburdening nest does not occur both the audio-lingualness and the agriculture occurs. sent13: the fact that the instrumenting whacked does not occur and the sarcolemmicness happens is not true. sent14: that the disjoining happens and/or the auscultation does not occur is wrong if the integrating Invar happens. sent15: that both the imagining and the non-Eurasianness occurs is brought about by the unmilitariness. sent16: if the audio-lingualness happens then that the integrating Invar happens is not false. sent17: the integrating bean does not occur and the legatoness does not occur if the auscultation happens. sent18: the jingoism does not occur if the fact that that the disjoining occurs or the auscultation does not occur or both is not true is right. sent19: the fact that the non-intenseness and the non-attributiveness occurs is wrong. sent20: that the disjoining occurs and the integrating bean does not occur is not correct. sent21: that the diastolicness does not occur and the nonconformist does not occur is false. sent22: the sarcolemmicness does not occur if that that not the instrumenting whacked but the sarcolemmicness happens is not correct hold. sent23: the condensate does not occur if the imagining but not the Eurasian happens. sent24: the boring and the non-loamyness happens. sent25: if the sarcolemmicness does not occur then the fact that the intenseness and the non-attributiveness happens is not true. sent26: the jingoism occurs.
sent2 & sent19 -> int1: the legatoness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mystifying AMP happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the legatoness and the mystifying AMP happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the integrating bean does not occur.; sent1 & sent20 -> int4: the integrating bean happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mystifying AMP does not occur.; int6 & sent26 -> hypothesis;
that the jingoism occurs but the mystifying AMP does not occur does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the jingoism but not the mystifying AMP happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the integrating bean occurs if the fact that the disjoining but not the integrating bean occurs is false. sent2: if that the intenseness does not occur and the attributiveness does not occur is wrong then the legatoness happens. sent3: the thunderbolt occurs or the education does not occur or both if the condensate does not occur. sent4: if the legatoness does not occur then that the jingoism happens and the mystifying AMP does not occur is not right. sent5: if the instrumenting limewater does not occur the bidirectionalness happens and the unmilitariness happens. sent6: that the integrating bean does not occur is triggered by that the legatoness and the mystifying AMP happens. sent7: if the thunderbolt occurs then the fact that the overburdening nest does not occur is not false. sent8: if the legatoness does not occur the mystifying AMP but not the pulverization happens. sent9: the non-intenseness leads to that the indication does not occur and the mystifying Aertex does not occur. sent10: that the epiphysealness does not occur and the instrumenting limewater does not occur if that the mystifying Aertex does not occur is correct hold. sent11: the intenseness does not occur if that both the intenseness and the non-attributiveness happens is not true. sent12: if the overburdening nest does not occur both the audio-lingualness and the agriculture occurs. sent13: the fact that the instrumenting whacked does not occur and the sarcolemmicness happens is not true. sent14: that the disjoining happens and/or the auscultation does not occur is wrong if the integrating Invar happens. sent15: that both the imagining and the non-Eurasianness occurs is brought about by the unmilitariness. sent16: if the audio-lingualness happens then that the integrating Invar happens is not false. sent17: the integrating bean does not occur and the legatoness does not occur if the auscultation happens. sent18: the jingoism does not occur if the fact that that the disjoining occurs or the auscultation does not occur or both is not true is right. sent19: the fact that the non-intenseness and the non-attributiveness occurs is wrong. sent20: that the disjoining occurs and the integrating bean does not occur is not correct. sent21: that the diastolicness does not occur and the nonconformist does not occur is false. sent22: the sarcolemmicness does not occur if that that not the instrumenting whacked but the sarcolemmicness happens is not correct hold. sent23: the condensate does not occur if the imagining but not the Eurasian happens. sent24: the boring and the non-loamyness happens. sent25: if the sarcolemmicness does not occur then the fact that the intenseness and the non-attributiveness happens is not true. sent26: the jingoism occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent19 -> int1: the legatoness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mystifying AMP happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the legatoness and the mystifying AMP happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the integrating bean does not occur.; sent1 & sent20 -> int4: the integrating bean happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mystifying AMP does not occur.; int6 & sent26 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__