the compromising exterminator occurs.
sent1: the biodefense does not occur. sent2: that the compromising countertop happens is prevented by that the due and the enrichment happens. sent3: both the whomping and the singing occurs. sent4: the unveiling occurs and the dabbing consuetude occurs. sent5: if the fact that either the due or the non-abiogeneticness or both happens is false then the compromising exterminator does not occur. sent6: that not the enrichment but the dabbing liked happens is incorrect. sent7: if the abiogeneticness happens the due occurs. sent8: not the efficientness but the unfreeness happens. sent9: that the enrichment occurs is not false if the fact that the enrichment does not occur but the dabbing liked happens is not right. sent10: the fact that the voltaicness occurs if the fact that both the voltaicnessness and the scissoring meniscus happens is not right is correct. sent11: the cormousness does not occur. sent12: that the compromising exterminator occurs hold if the abiogeneticness does not occur and the departing happens. sent13: the fact that the biomedicalness occurs is not incorrect. sent14: the dabbing liked but not the departing happens if the heading does not occur. sent15: the compromising countertop happens. sent16: the polarness happens. sent17: the departing occurs. sent18: that that not the Germanic but the coursing occurs is correct is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abiogeneticness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the due occurs.; sent9 & sent6 -> int2: the enrichment occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the due and the enrichment occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the compromising countertop does not occur.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the abiogeneticness does not occur.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: not the abiogeneticness but the departing occurs.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the compromising exterminator does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the compromising exterminator occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the biodefense does not occur. sent2: that the compromising countertop happens is prevented by that the due and the enrichment happens. sent3: both the whomping and the singing occurs. sent4: the unveiling occurs and the dabbing consuetude occurs. sent5: if the fact that either the due or the non-abiogeneticness or both happens is false then the compromising exterminator does not occur. sent6: that not the enrichment but the dabbing liked happens is incorrect. sent7: if the abiogeneticness happens the due occurs. sent8: not the efficientness but the unfreeness happens. sent9: that the enrichment occurs is not false if the fact that the enrichment does not occur but the dabbing liked happens is not right. sent10: the fact that the voltaicness occurs if the fact that both the voltaicnessness and the scissoring meniscus happens is not right is correct. sent11: the cormousness does not occur. sent12: that the compromising exterminator occurs hold if the abiogeneticness does not occur and the departing happens. sent13: the fact that the biomedicalness occurs is not incorrect. sent14: the dabbing liked but not the departing happens if the heading does not occur. sent15: the compromising countertop happens. sent16: the polarness happens. sent17: the departing occurs. sent18: that that not the Germanic but the coursing occurs is correct is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abiogeneticness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the due occurs.; sent9 & sent6 -> int2: the enrichment occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the due and the enrichment occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the compromising countertop does not occur.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the abiogeneticness does not occur.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: not the abiogeneticness but the departing occurs.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__