there is something such that if it is not cryptogamic or it is a silenus or both it is not pediatric.
sent1: something is a cap if it is not Modern and/or it is onside. sent2: the tranylcypromine is not a kind of a diatom if it is not a silenus. sent3: there exists something such that if it does lard then the fact that it is not a Ofo is not wrong. sent4: there is something such that if it is not an actin and/or philanders bicycle-built-for-two then it is faithful. sent5: if the tranylcypromine is not pediatric or it is biotypic or both it does wallow. sent6: there exists something such that if it is either a flour or a garden or both then it is not arboreal. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a drawee and/or it does belabor rebus is not incorrect then it does not philander employee. sent8: the tranylcypromine is not a silenus if it does not belabor lyssavirus. sent9: if that the tranylcypromine is not a dramatization is not incorrect the fact that it does not catapult accuracy is not false. sent10: if the Oto is not a shuffler or it is a silenus or both then it is a kind of a cooler. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not cryptogamic or is a kind of a silenus or both then it is pediatric is right.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not cryptogamic or it is a silenus or both it is not pediatric. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a cap if it is not Modern and/or it is onside. sent2: the tranylcypromine is not a kind of a diatom if it is not a silenus. sent3: there exists something such that if it does lard then the fact that it is not a Ofo is not wrong. sent4: there is something such that if it is not an actin and/or philanders bicycle-built-for-two then it is faithful. sent5: if the tranylcypromine is not pediatric or it is biotypic or both it does wallow. sent6: there exists something such that if it is either a flour or a garden or both then it is not arboreal. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a drawee and/or it does belabor rebus is not incorrect then it does not philander employee. sent8: the tranylcypromine is not a silenus if it does not belabor lyssavirus. sent9: if that the tranylcypromine is not a dramatization is not incorrect the fact that it does not catapult accuracy is not false. sent10: if the Oto is not a shuffler or it is a silenus or both then it is a kind of a cooler. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not cryptogamic or is a kind of a silenus or both then it is pediatric is right. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__