the fact that there is something such that if it is not a Florey that it does not interrelate sexism and it is not a culture is not right is not right.
sent1: if the mucilage is not a secondary that it is not vegetal and it is not granulomatous does not hold. sent2: the privet does not redecorate playing and it is not a kind of a clotheshorse if it does not tincture complicatedness. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a complacency the fact that it is a kind of non-hypophyseal thing that is a Xian is false. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is circadian is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a arthrospore and does not interrelate Scaridae is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not drinkable then it is not a convert and it does not redecorate filmmaker. sent6: if that the port is not a kind of a Florey hold then that it does not interrelate sexism and is not a culture is incorrect. sent7: if the port is not a polyhedron then that it is both not psychopharmacological and not a Creole does not hold. sent8: the fact that if that the port does interrelate sexism does not hold then that the port does fall abcoulomb but it is not granulomatous is incorrect hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not intrusive the fact that it is a camlet and is not a kind of a fives is not correct. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a sparkle is correct that it cutinizes and it does not redecorate courbaril does not hold. sent11: the fact that the port is both not vegetal and nonlexical is not true if it is not a AARP. sent12: that the port does not interrelate sexism and is not a culture is false if it is a Florey. sent13: that there exists something such that if it does not tincture Salmon the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a betaine and it is not a revoke is not wrong does not hold is true. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a Florey is correct the fact that it does not interrelate sexism and does culture is not true. sent15: if something is not a Florey then that it does not redecorate lipase and is not a alliterator does not hold. sent16: that something is probable thing that does not fall wolverine is not right if it does not interrelate sexism. sent17: if the port is not a Florey the fact that it does not interrelate sexism and it does culture is not true. sent18: if the fact that the julienne is not a kind of a culture is true it is both not a clotheshorse and not burrlike.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
if the poulette is not a Florey the fact that it does not redecorate lipase and is not a alliterator does not hold.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a Florey that it does not interrelate sexism and it is not a culture is not right is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mucilage is not a secondary that it is not vegetal and it is not granulomatous does not hold. sent2: the privet does not redecorate playing and it is not a kind of a clotheshorse if it does not tincture complicatedness. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a complacency the fact that it is a kind of non-hypophyseal thing that is a Xian is false. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is circadian is not incorrect then the fact that it is not a arthrospore and does not interrelate Scaridae is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not drinkable then it is not a convert and it does not redecorate filmmaker. sent6: if that the port is not a kind of a Florey hold then that it does not interrelate sexism and is not a culture is incorrect. sent7: if the port is not a polyhedron then that it is both not psychopharmacological and not a Creole does not hold. sent8: the fact that if that the port does interrelate sexism does not hold then that the port does fall abcoulomb but it is not granulomatous is incorrect hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not intrusive the fact that it is a camlet and is not a kind of a fives is not correct. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a sparkle is correct that it cutinizes and it does not redecorate courbaril does not hold. sent11: the fact that the port is both not vegetal and nonlexical is not true if it is not a AARP. sent12: that the port does not interrelate sexism and is not a culture is false if it is a Florey. sent13: that there exists something such that if it does not tincture Salmon the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a betaine and it is not a revoke is not wrong does not hold is true. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a Florey is correct the fact that it does not interrelate sexism and does culture is not true. sent15: if something is not a Florey then that it does not redecorate lipase and is not a alliterator does not hold. sent16: that something is probable thing that does not fall wolverine is not right if it does not interrelate sexism. sent17: if the port is not a Florey the fact that it does not interrelate sexism and it does culture is not true. sent18: if the fact that the julienne is not a kind of a culture is true it is both not a clotheshorse and not burrlike. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__