the angiocardiogram is a raincoat.
sent1: the accountant is uninformative. sent2: if something is not basophilic then the fact that it is not a treachery but a reform is not right. sent3: the angiocardiogram is not basophilic if the resolution does not nutate. sent4: something is a raincoat if the fact that it is not a treachery and it reforms is wrong. sent5: the fact that the resolution is not a hyperbola is not wrong. sent6: if the fact that the accountant does not concretize Bradford and it does not descry bellyband is not correct the bellyband is not granuliferous. sent7: the accountant is not a hyperbola and it is not a metallic if that it does not concretize Bradford is not incorrect. sent8: the resolution does not nutate if the bellyband is not granuliferous. sent9: the angiocardiogram does not descry bellyband and does not concretize photojournalism. sent10: the fact that that the accountant is both not a hyperbola and not a metallic is not false is not correct if it is uninformative. sent11: if the accountant does not nutate and is granuliferous then it is metallic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accountant does not concretize Bradford and does not descry bellyband.; assump1 -> int1: the accountant does not concretize Bradford.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the accountant is not a hyperbola and it is not metallic.; sent10 & sent1 -> int3: that the accountant is not a hyperbola and is not a metallic is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the accountant does not concretize Bradford and it does not descry bellyband does not hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the bellyband is not granuliferous.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the resolution does not nutate.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the angiocardiogram is not basophilic.; sent2 -> int9: that the angiocardiogram is not a treachery but it does reform does not hold if it is not basophilic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that that the angiocardiogram is not a treachery and is a reform is not wrong is false.; sent4 -> int11: if the fact that the angiocardiogram is both not a treachery and a reform does not hold then it is a kind of a raincoat.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the paneling is a hyperbola.
$hypothesis$ = the angiocardiogram is a raincoat. ; $context$ = sent1: the accountant is uninformative. sent2: if something is not basophilic then the fact that it is not a treachery but a reform is not right. sent3: the angiocardiogram is not basophilic if the resolution does not nutate. sent4: something is a raincoat if the fact that it is not a treachery and it reforms is wrong. sent5: the fact that the resolution is not a hyperbola is not wrong. sent6: if the fact that the accountant does not concretize Bradford and it does not descry bellyband is not correct the bellyband is not granuliferous. sent7: the accountant is not a hyperbola and it is not a metallic if that it does not concretize Bradford is not incorrect. sent8: the resolution does not nutate if the bellyband is not granuliferous. sent9: the angiocardiogram does not descry bellyband and does not concretize photojournalism. sent10: the fact that that the accountant is both not a hyperbola and not a metallic is not false is not correct if it is uninformative. sent11: if the accountant does not nutate and is granuliferous then it is metallic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accountant does not concretize Bradford and does not descry bellyband.; assump1 -> int1: the accountant does not concretize Bradford.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the accountant is not a hyperbola and it is not metallic.; sent10 & sent1 -> int3: that the accountant is not a hyperbola and is not a metallic is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the accountant does not concretize Bradford and it does not descry bellyband does not hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the bellyband is not granuliferous.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the resolution does not nutate.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the angiocardiogram is not basophilic.; sent2 -> int9: that the angiocardiogram is not a treachery but it does reform does not hold if it is not basophilic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that that the angiocardiogram is not a treachery and is a reform is not wrong is false.; sent4 -> int11: if the fact that the angiocardiogram is both not a treachery and a reform does not hold then it is a kind of a raincoat.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__