the fact that the drinking does not begrudge and tables is not true.
sent1: that the farina is both not an anomie and a teachership does not hold. sent2: the drinking is a pya. sent3: the farina is not an estrus if the drinking is a pya and is definite. sent4: the fact that the huddler does not disengage and it is not a dump is incorrect if it is a kind of a gingersnap. sent5: if the fact that the Karelian is a kind of an anomie but it is not an estrus is not true then the fact that the Depokene is an estrus is not wrong. sent6: if that the farina is not an anomie and is a teachership is not true it is an anomie. sent7: the farina is not a pya. sent8: something does not begrudge but it tables if it is not definite. sent9: if the Depokene is an estrus that the farina is definite is correct. sent10: the disentangler does intensify Woodhull and it is ungual. sent11: the huddler is not glabellar if that the disentangler is not glabellar or it is a gladdon or both is not true. sent12: the farina does not table if the drinking is an estrus and is an anomie. sent13: if the huddler is non-glabellar the fact that it is non-air-to-air thing that is not a teachership is not true. sent14: the fact that something is an anomie but it is not an estrus is not correct if it does not prey tahini. sent15: the Karelian does not prey tahini if the huddler is a kind of a teachership and it is inarticulate. sent16: the beachcomber does begrudge. sent17: if the fact that something is not air-to-air and is not a teachership is not correct it is a teachership. sent18: the fact that the drinking does not begrudge is right. sent19: if something is not definite it does not begrudge. sent20: something that is an anomie is an estrus. sent21: the drinking does not begrudge if it is not definite. sent22: if the disentangler does intensify Woodhull the fact that it is not glabellar or it is a gladdon or both does not hold. sent23: if that something does not disengage and does not dump is false then it is inarticulate. sent24: if the farina is a kind of a pya then that the drinking does not begrudge and does table does not hold. sent25: that the farina is an anomie and is a teachership does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drinking is definite.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the drinking is a pya that is definite.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the farina is not an estrus.; sent20 -> int3: the farina is an estrus if that it is an anomie is not false.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the farina is an anomie hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the farina is a kind of an estrus.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the drinking is not definite is not wrong.; sent8 -> int8: the drinking does not begrudge but it is a table if it is not definite.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the drinking does not begrudge but it tables is wrong.
sent14 -> int9: that the Karelian is an anomie and is not a kind of an estrus is not correct if it does not prey tahini.; sent17 -> int10: if the fact that the huddler is not air-to-air and is not a kind of a teachership does not hold then the fact that it is a teachership is correct.; sent10 -> int11: the fact that the disentangler intensifies Woodhull is true.; sent22 & int11 -> int12: that the disentangler is not glabellar and/or it is a kind of a gladdon is not true.; sent11 & int12 -> int13: the huddler is not glabellar.; sent13 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the huddler is not air-to-air and it is not a teachership is false.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the huddler is a teachership.; sent23 -> int16: if the fact that the huddler does not disengage and it is not a kind of a dump is not true then it is inarticulate.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the drinking does not begrudge and tables is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the farina is both not an anomie and a teachership does not hold. sent2: the drinking is a pya. sent3: the farina is not an estrus if the drinking is a pya and is definite. sent4: the fact that the huddler does not disengage and it is not a dump is incorrect if it is a kind of a gingersnap. sent5: if the fact that the Karelian is a kind of an anomie but it is not an estrus is not true then the fact that the Depokene is an estrus is not wrong. sent6: if that the farina is not an anomie and is a teachership is not true it is an anomie. sent7: the farina is not a pya. sent8: something does not begrudge but it tables if it is not definite. sent9: if the Depokene is an estrus that the farina is definite is correct. sent10: the disentangler does intensify Woodhull and it is ungual. sent11: the huddler is not glabellar if that the disentangler is not glabellar or it is a gladdon or both is not true. sent12: the farina does not table if the drinking is an estrus and is an anomie. sent13: if the huddler is non-glabellar the fact that it is non-air-to-air thing that is not a teachership is not true. sent14: the fact that something is an anomie but it is not an estrus is not correct if it does not prey tahini. sent15: the Karelian does not prey tahini if the huddler is a kind of a teachership and it is inarticulate. sent16: the beachcomber does begrudge. sent17: if the fact that something is not air-to-air and is not a teachership is not correct it is a teachership. sent18: the fact that the drinking does not begrudge is right. sent19: if something is not definite it does not begrudge. sent20: something that is an anomie is an estrus. sent21: the drinking does not begrudge if it is not definite. sent22: if the disentangler does intensify Woodhull the fact that it is not glabellar or it is a gladdon or both does not hold. sent23: if that something does not disengage and does not dump is false then it is inarticulate. sent24: if the farina is a kind of a pya then that the drinking does not begrudge and does table does not hold. sent25: that the farina is an anomie and is a teachership does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drinking is definite.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the drinking is a pya that is definite.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the farina is not an estrus.; sent20 -> int3: the farina is an estrus if that it is an anomie is not false.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the farina is an anomie hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the farina is a kind of an estrus.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the drinking is not definite is not wrong.; sent8 -> int8: the drinking does not begrudge but it is a table if it is not definite.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__