the deserving Limnodromus does not occur.
sent1: that if the jarring does not occur then the fact that not the passive but the nimbus occurs is not correct is true. sent2: that both the mandibulateness and the toleration happens brings about that the strangulating amphidiploidy does not occur. sent3: that the deserving Limnodromus and the strangulating lectureship happens is not right if the mandibulateness does not occur. sent4: the strangulating lectureship occurs. sent5: the strangulating amphidiploidy happens. sent6: if the toleration does not occur either the passiveness occurs or the deserving yak occurs or both. sent7: both the strangulating lectureship and the mandibulateness occurs. sent8: the fact that that the deserving Limnodromus occurs is not correct does not hold if the deserving yak happens. sent9: that that the deserving yak does not occur is not false if that that both the non-passiveness and the nimbus occurs is not correct is not wrong is not false. sent10: the deserving Limnodromus does not occur if that the deserving Limnodromus and the strangulating lectureship occurs does not hold. sent11: if the passive occurs the deserving Limnodromus happens.
sent7 -> int1: that the mandibulateness happens is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toleration happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the mandibulateness occurs and the toleration occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the strangulating amphidiploidy does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the toleration does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: either the passive or the deserving yak or both occurs.; int6 & sent11 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the deserving Limnodromus does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the deserving Limnodromus does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the jarring does not occur then the fact that not the passive but the nimbus occurs is not correct is true. sent2: that both the mandibulateness and the toleration happens brings about that the strangulating amphidiploidy does not occur. sent3: that the deserving Limnodromus and the strangulating lectureship happens is not right if the mandibulateness does not occur. sent4: the strangulating lectureship occurs. sent5: the strangulating amphidiploidy happens. sent6: if the toleration does not occur either the passiveness occurs or the deserving yak occurs or both. sent7: both the strangulating lectureship and the mandibulateness occurs. sent8: the fact that that the deserving Limnodromus occurs is not correct does not hold if the deserving yak happens. sent9: that that the deserving yak does not occur is not false if that that both the non-passiveness and the nimbus occurs is not correct is not wrong is not false. sent10: the deserving Limnodromus does not occur if that the deserving Limnodromus and the strangulating lectureship occurs does not hold. sent11: if the passive occurs the deserving Limnodromus happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the mandibulateness happens is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toleration happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the mandibulateness occurs and the toleration occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the strangulating amphidiploidy does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the toleration does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: either the passive or the deserving yak or both occurs.; int6 & sent11 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__