the caning homeowner does not occur.
sent1: that the inelegantness but not the specialization occurs is not correct if the classical happens. sent2: that the mushroom does not occur causes the naming. sent3: the cholinergicness occurs if the fact that the macroeconomicsness occurs and the looming collectivization does not occur is incorrect. sent4: both the impedance and the caning Stockholm occurs. sent5: if the eluting heroism and the naming occurs then the caning homeowner does not occur. sent6: that the incubation does not occur is caused by that the needlework happens and the mushroom happens. sent7: the classicalness occurs. sent8: the fact that the chrysotherapy does not occur and the autotelicness occurs is not true. sent9: the fact that the incubation occurs is right if that the sin does not occur and the incubation does not occur is false. sent10: not the ruffianism but the needlework happens. sent11: the stumping happens. sent12: the fact that the indemnification happens is right. sent13: the eluting heroism happens if that the inelegantness happens but the specialization does not occur is incorrect. sent14: if the sternutatoriness happens that the obscenity happens and the whip occurs does not hold.
sent10 -> int1: the needlework occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mushrooming occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the needlework occurs and the mushrooming occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the incubation does not occur.; sent1 & sent7 -> int4: that the inelegantness happens but the specialization does not occur is wrong.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the eluting heroism occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the caning homeowner does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the inelegantness but not the specialization occurs is not correct if the classical happens. sent2: that the mushroom does not occur causes the naming. sent3: the cholinergicness occurs if the fact that the macroeconomicsness occurs and the looming collectivization does not occur is incorrect. sent4: both the impedance and the caning Stockholm occurs. sent5: if the eluting heroism and the naming occurs then the caning homeowner does not occur. sent6: that the incubation does not occur is caused by that the needlework happens and the mushroom happens. sent7: the classicalness occurs. sent8: the fact that the chrysotherapy does not occur and the autotelicness occurs is not true. sent9: the fact that the incubation occurs is right if that the sin does not occur and the incubation does not occur is false. sent10: not the ruffianism but the needlework happens. sent11: the stumping happens. sent12: the fact that the indemnification happens is right. sent13: the eluting heroism happens if that the inelegantness happens but the specialization does not occur is incorrect. sent14: if the sternutatoriness happens that the obscenity happens and the whip occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the needlework occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mushrooming occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the needlework occurs and the mushrooming occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the incubation does not occur.; sent1 & sent7 -> int4: that the inelegantness happens but the specialization does not occur is wrong.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the eluting heroism occurs.; __UNKNOWN__