if the amiodarone voids arcus then the fact that the aviatrix is not a kind of a formidability and it is not righteous does not hold.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is a Wycherley and/or does not come does not hold then the amiodarone is a barrator. sent2: if something elutes amiodarone and is a kind of a barrator it does not void arcus. sent3: if the fact that the amiodarone does not elute amiodarone is not false then the fact that the aviatrix is not a formidability and is not righteous is not true. sent4: that the Guarnerius is a kind of a Wycherley or it does not come or both does not hold.
sent4 -> int1: that there is something such that the fact that either it is a Wycherley or it does not come or both is wrong is not wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the amiodarone is a barrator.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amiodarone does elute amiodarone.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the amiodarone elutes amiodarone and it is a barrator.; sent2 -> int4: if the amiodarone does elute amiodarone and it is a barrator that it does not void arcus is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the amiodarone does not void arcus.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the amiodarone does void arcus.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the amiodarone does not elute amiodarone.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: that the aviatrix is not a formidability and it is not righteous is not correct.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the amiodarone voids arcus then the fact that the aviatrix is not a kind of a formidability and it is not righteous does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is a Wycherley and/or does not come does not hold then the amiodarone is a barrator. sent2: if something elutes amiodarone and is a kind of a barrator it does not void arcus. sent3: if the fact that the amiodarone does not elute amiodarone is not false then the fact that the aviatrix is not a formidability and is not righteous is not true. sent4: that the Guarnerius is a kind of a Wycherley or it does not come or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that there is something such that the fact that either it is a Wycherley or it does not come or both is wrong is not wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the amiodarone is a barrator.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amiodarone does elute amiodarone.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the amiodarone elutes amiodarone and it is a barrator.; sent2 -> int4: if the amiodarone does elute amiodarone and it is a barrator that it does not void arcus is true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the amiodarone does not void arcus.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the amiodarone does void arcus.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the amiodarone does not elute amiodarone.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: that the aviatrix is not a formidability and it is not righteous is not correct.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__