the nonclassicalness prevents the non-heterotrophicness.
sent1: if the southernness does not occur the radiotherapy happens. sent2: the mowing happens but the cross-sectionalness does not occur. sent3: if the Brazilian happens but the jellifying bandicoot does not occur the heterotrophicness occurs. sent4: the charactering occurs and the jellifying bandicoot does not occur if the draping stuffiness occurs. sent5: the fruitfulness happens. sent6: both the non-alliaceousness and the non-angriness occurs. sent7: if the nonclassicalness does not occur then the cross-sectionalness does not occur and the arguing does not occur. sent8: the diligence happens. sent9: that the draping stuffiness does not occur and the jellifying bandicoot does not occur is not true if the character does not occur. sent10: if the snuffling does not occur the kismet occurs. sent11: if the comeback does not occur then the cytotoxicness occurs. sent12: if the fruitfulness happens then the fact that both the non-Brazilianness and the heterotrophicness occurs is incorrect. sent13: the charactering occurs. sent14: the fruitfulness happens if the fact that the unangryness and the alliaceousness occurs is incorrect. sent15: if the alliaceousness does not occur then the Brazilianness and the fruitfulness occurs. sent16: the angriness does not occur. sent17: if the radiotherapy does not occur then not the ventilation but the preempting rowdiness occurs. sent18: the fruitfulness happens if that the alliaceousness does not occur is not false. sent19: if the preempting rowdiness happens that both the non-angriness and the alliaceousness happens is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonclassicalness occurs.; sent6 -> int1: the alliaceousness does not occur.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the Brazilian and the fruitfulness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the Brazilian occurs.;
the cross-sectionalness does not occur and the arguing does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the nonclassicalness prevents the non-heterotrophicness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the southernness does not occur the radiotherapy happens. sent2: the mowing happens but the cross-sectionalness does not occur. sent3: if the Brazilian happens but the jellifying bandicoot does not occur the heterotrophicness occurs. sent4: the charactering occurs and the jellifying bandicoot does not occur if the draping stuffiness occurs. sent5: the fruitfulness happens. sent6: both the non-alliaceousness and the non-angriness occurs. sent7: if the nonclassicalness does not occur then the cross-sectionalness does not occur and the arguing does not occur. sent8: the diligence happens. sent9: that the draping stuffiness does not occur and the jellifying bandicoot does not occur is not true if the character does not occur. sent10: if the snuffling does not occur the kismet occurs. sent11: if the comeback does not occur then the cytotoxicness occurs. sent12: if the fruitfulness happens then the fact that both the non-Brazilianness and the heterotrophicness occurs is incorrect. sent13: the charactering occurs. sent14: the fruitfulness happens if the fact that the unangryness and the alliaceousness occurs is incorrect. sent15: if the alliaceousness does not occur then the Brazilianness and the fruitfulness occurs. sent16: the angriness does not occur. sent17: if the radiotherapy does not occur then not the ventilation but the preempting rowdiness occurs. sent18: the fruitfulness happens if that the alliaceousness does not occur is not false. sent19: if the preempting rowdiness happens that both the non-angriness and the alliaceousness happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonclassicalness occurs.; sent6 -> int1: the alliaceousness does not occur.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the Brazilian and the fruitfulness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the Brazilian occurs.; __UNKNOWN__