the pericarp does bellow.
sent1: if something is not a steps it collogues fartlek and it is orthodontic. sent2: if the fact that the march dwindles but it does not collogue prowler does not hold that the rhinion does not collogue prowler is not false. sent3: the rhinion does collogue prowler if it does expire Durer. sent4: if the rhinion does collogue prowler and/or it minstrels intersection the pericarp is not a bellow. sent5: if the rhinion is not a bellow that that it does not expire Durer and it does minstrel intersection is not wrong does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the balk is not a sunstroke or does not collogue thrombectomy or both is false then the sesamoid is a Wallace. sent7: The Durer does expire rhinion. sent8: the rhinion does expire Durer. sent9: that something is not a sunstroke and/or it does not collogue thrombectomy is not right if it collogues fartlek. sent10: if the rhinion is a bellow the pericarp does not collogue prowler. sent11: if the sesamoid is a Wallace then the provirus minstrels intersection. sent12: the pericarp does not bellow if the rhinion does minstrel intersection. sent13: if the rhinion does not collogue prowler then the pericarp bellows and it expires Durer. sent14: the balk is not a steps.
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: that that the rhinion collogues prowler is not correct does not hold.; int1 -> int2: either the rhinion does collogue prowler or it minstrels intersection or both.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the pericarp collogues prowler.
$hypothesis$ = the pericarp does bellow. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a steps it collogues fartlek and it is orthodontic. sent2: if the fact that the march dwindles but it does not collogue prowler does not hold that the rhinion does not collogue prowler is not false. sent3: the rhinion does collogue prowler if it does expire Durer. sent4: if the rhinion does collogue prowler and/or it minstrels intersection the pericarp is not a bellow. sent5: if the rhinion is not a bellow that that it does not expire Durer and it does minstrel intersection is not wrong does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the balk is not a sunstroke or does not collogue thrombectomy or both is false then the sesamoid is a Wallace. sent7: The Durer does expire rhinion. sent8: the rhinion does expire Durer. sent9: that something is not a sunstroke and/or it does not collogue thrombectomy is not right if it collogues fartlek. sent10: if the rhinion is a bellow the pericarp does not collogue prowler. sent11: if the sesamoid is a Wallace then the provirus minstrels intersection. sent12: the pericarp does not bellow if the rhinion does minstrel intersection. sent13: if the rhinion does not collogue prowler then the pericarp bellows and it expires Durer. sent14: the balk is not a steps. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent8 -> int1: that that the rhinion collogues prowler is not correct does not hold.; int1 -> int2: either the rhinion does collogue prowler or it minstrels intersection or both.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__