there exists something such that if it is not a Sculptor then the fact that it does not remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the synchroscope does not adjoin chalazion and is not a disaccharidase is not true if it does not remodel nightwork. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Sculptor then that it does remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the synchroscope is not classificatory hold then the fact that it is not a Hyaenidae and it does not adjoin chalazion is not true. sent4: if something is not caducean the fact that it does not entrain and it is not a shirtlifter is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Sculptor it does not remodel Luda and does not adjoin chalazion. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not conceptualistic is correct then that it does not glorify and is not a radiobiology does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a immunofluorescence then the fact that it is non-Jovian thing that is not conceptualistic does not hold. sent8: the synchroscope does not remodel Luda and does not adjoin chalazion if it is not a Sculptor. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a foramen that it is not sociocultural and it is not off-line is false. sent10: that the keelboat does not emulsify pomp and is not Jovian is wrong if it does not emulsify deictic. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a Sculptor the fact that it does not remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion is not true. sent12: if the synchroscope is not a Sculptor then that it does not remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion is incorrect. sent13: that the synchroscope does not remodel Luda but it does adjoin chalazion does not hold if it is not a kind of a Sculptor. sent14: the fact that the synchroscope does not remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion does not hold if it is a kind of a Sculptor. sent15: the fact that the synchroscope remodels Luda but it does not adjoin chalazion does not hold if it is not a Sculptor. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a Sculptor then the fact that it does not remodel Luda and does adjoin chalazion is false.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the monkfish does not entrain and is not a shirtlifter is not true if it is not caducean.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a Sculptor then the fact that it does not remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the synchroscope does not adjoin chalazion and is not a disaccharidase is not true if it does not remodel nightwork. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Sculptor then that it does remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the synchroscope is not classificatory hold then the fact that it is not a Hyaenidae and it does not adjoin chalazion is not true. sent4: if something is not caducean the fact that it does not entrain and it is not a shirtlifter is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Sculptor it does not remodel Luda and does not adjoin chalazion. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not conceptualistic is correct then that it does not glorify and is not a radiobiology does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a immunofluorescence then the fact that it is non-Jovian thing that is not conceptualistic does not hold. sent8: the synchroscope does not remodel Luda and does not adjoin chalazion if it is not a Sculptor. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a foramen that it is not sociocultural and it is not off-line is false. sent10: that the keelboat does not emulsify pomp and is not Jovian is wrong if it does not emulsify deictic. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a Sculptor the fact that it does not remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion is not true. sent12: if the synchroscope is not a Sculptor then that it does not remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion is incorrect. sent13: that the synchroscope does not remodel Luda but it does adjoin chalazion does not hold if it is not a kind of a Sculptor. sent14: the fact that the synchroscope does not remodel Luda and it does not adjoin chalazion does not hold if it is a kind of a Sculptor. sent15: the fact that the synchroscope remodels Luda but it does not adjoin chalazion does not hold if it is not a Sculptor. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a Sculptor then the fact that it does not remodel Luda and does adjoin chalazion is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__