that the invitation does not occur and the unselfishness does not occur is caused by that the dew happens.
sent1: not the anticlimax but the dew happens if the theophany does not occur. sent2: that the counterclaim does not occur is right. sent3: if the dew occurs and the theophany happens then the sending solleret does not occur. sent4: the theophany happens. sent5: if the crossover occurs the counterclaiming but not the sending Thoth occurs. sent6: the zygomaticness occurs. sent7: the fact that the unresentfulness happens and the hula does not occur is true if the snowballing cantilever happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dew occurs.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: both the dew and the theophany occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the sending solleret does not occur.;
the anticlimax does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the invitation does not occur and the unselfishness does not occur is caused by that the dew happens. ; $context$ = sent1: not the anticlimax but the dew happens if the theophany does not occur. sent2: that the counterclaim does not occur is right. sent3: if the dew occurs and the theophany happens then the sending solleret does not occur. sent4: the theophany happens. sent5: if the crossover occurs the counterclaiming but not the sending Thoth occurs. sent6: the zygomaticness occurs. sent7: the fact that the unresentfulness happens and the hula does not occur is true if the snowballing cantilever happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dew occurs.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: both the dew and the theophany occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the sending solleret does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__