the steam is sinkable.
sent1: if something is not masochistic then the fact that it is a personification that is not characteristic is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it is not masochistic. sent3: the steam is not masochistic if the parcel is not a etymologist and/or it is masochistic. sent4: the steam is sinkable if the parcel is uncharacteristic. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a personification hold that the parcel is both non-masochistic and not uncharacteristic does not hold. sent6: that something is not sinkable is correct if it is not a personification. sent7: something is a kind of a characteristic. sent8: there is something such that it is not a personification.
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: that the parcel is both not masochistic and characteristic is wrong.;
that the steam is not sinkable hold.
sent6 -> int2: if the steam is not a kind of a personification then it is not sinkable.; sent1 -> int3: if the steam is non-masochistic the fact that it is a kind of a personification and it is not a kind of a characteristic is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the steam is sinkable. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not masochistic then the fact that it is a personification that is not characteristic is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it is not masochistic. sent3: the steam is not masochistic if the parcel is not a etymologist and/or it is masochistic. sent4: the steam is sinkable if the parcel is uncharacteristic. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a personification hold that the parcel is both non-masochistic and not uncharacteristic does not hold. sent6: that something is not sinkable is correct if it is not a personification. sent7: something is a kind of a characteristic. sent8: there is something such that it is not a personification. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent5 -> int1: that the parcel is both not masochistic and characteristic is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__