that the booklet is a kind of an intangible is correct.
sent1: something does not converge but it is intangible if it does syllogize booklet. sent2: that the professor does toilet-train Baraka and/or syllogizes booklet is not correct. sent3: if the fact that the booklet is not an intangible but it does converge is false then the toxicognath is intangible. sent4: if the professor is not a terrapin then the booklet does not toilet-train Baraka and articulates sphenoid. sent5: the professor does articulate sphenoid if the sphenoid is not a terrapin but it does anastomose. sent6: the sphenoid does not converge. sent7: there exists something such that it does mountaineer. sent8: the professor is not a kind of a terrapin if the fact that the sphenoid is a terrapin and does anastomose does not hold. sent9: the professor does not converge if the fact that the fact that either it does toilet-train Baraka or it syllogizes booklet or both hold does not hold. sent10: if something does not toilet-train Baraka and articulates sphenoid it syllogizes booklet. sent11: the professor does not syllogize booklet. sent12: if the booklet is an intangible the professor converges. sent13: the professor is an intangible if the booklet does converge. sent14: the tuille is not an intangible. sent15: if something mountaineers then the fact that the barrio does not toilet-train barrio and is a terrapin does not hold. sent16: if the professor does articulate sphenoid then it toilet-trains Baraka. sent17: there is something such that it does not articulate dura. sent18: something that is an intangible syllogizes booklet.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the booklet is a kind of an intangible.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the professor does converge.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the professor does not converge.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the toxicognath does syllogize booklet.
sent18 -> int4: the toxicognath does syllogize booklet if it is a kind of an intangible.; sent7 & sent15 -> int5: the fact that the barrio does not toilet-train barrio but it is a terrapin is not true.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it does not toilet-train barrio and is a kind of a terrapin is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the booklet is a kind of an intangible is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not converge but it is intangible if it does syllogize booklet. sent2: that the professor does toilet-train Baraka and/or syllogizes booklet is not correct. sent3: if the fact that the booklet is not an intangible but it does converge is false then the toxicognath is intangible. sent4: if the professor is not a terrapin then the booklet does not toilet-train Baraka and articulates sphenoid. sent5: the professor does articulate sphenoid if the sphenoid is not a terrapin but it does anastomose. sent6: the sphenoid does not converge. sent7: there exists something such that it does mountaineer. sent8: the professor is not a kind of a terrapin if the fact that the sphenoid is a terrapin and does anastomose does not hold. sent9: the professor does not converge if the fact that the fact that either it does toilet-train Baraka or it syllogizes booklet or both hold does not hold. sent10: if something does not toilet-train Baraka and articulates sphenoid it syllogizes booklet. sent11: the professor does not syllogize booklet. sent12: if the booklet is an intangible the professor converges. sent13: the professor is an intangible if the booklet does converge. sent14: the tuille is not an intangible. sent15: if something mountaineers then the fact that the barrio does not toilet-train barrio and is a terrapin does not hold. sent16: if the professor does articulate sphenoid then it toilet-trains Baraka. sent17: there is something such that it does not articulate dura. sent18: something that is an intangible syllogizes booklet. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the booklet is a kind of an intangible.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the professor does converge.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the professor does not converge.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__