the non-backhandedness is triggered by that the stainableness happens.
sent1: the monocotyledonousness occurs if the fact that either the execution does not occur or the trivializing imaging happens or both is wrong. sent2: the doweling occurs if that either the knitting bailor or the embarking or both happens is false. sent3: the abruption occurs. sent4: that the backhanding happens is caused by the stainableness. sent5: the findings occurs. sent6: that either the knitting bailor does not occur or the embarking occurs or both is not true. sent7: that the backhandedness and the doweling happens prevents that the stainableness occurs. sent8: the pant does not occur. sent9: the gyration occurs. sent10: if the fact that the knitting bailor does not occur and/or the embarking occurs is incorrect then the doweling happens.
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the doweling occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backhanding occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the backhandedness and the doweling occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the stainableness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stainableness occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the backhanding does not occur is right.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the non-backhandedness is triggered by that the stainableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the monocotyledonousness occurs if the fact that either the execution does not occur or the trivializing imaging happens or both is wrong. sent2: the doweling occurs if that either the knitting bailor or the embarking or both happens is false. sent3: the abruption occurs. sent4: that the backhanding happens is caused by the stainableness. sent5: the findings occurs. sent6: that either the knitting bailor does not occur or the embarking occurs or both is not true. sent7: that the backhandedness and the doweling happens prevents that the stainableness occurs. sent8: the pant does not occur. sent9: the gyration occurs. sent10: if the fact that the knitting bailor does not occur and/or the embarking occurs is incorrect then the doweling happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the doweling occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backhanding occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the backhandedness and the doweling occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the stainableness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stainableness occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the backhanding does not occur is right.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__