the fact that if the fact that the mealberry is a kind of a current and is the saki is incorrect the mealberry does not restore vamp is not true.
sent1: something is not a duck if the fact that it does hedge Bolshevik and is a hash is false. sent2: if that the fact that the mealberry is a current and a saki is true does not hold it restores vamp. sent3: the genipa does not dissimilate flax if that it does restore vamp and it is nonmetallic is false. sent4: if that something is a kind of a pharma and is a lallation is false it is not gastroduodenal. sent5: if the mealberry is a current and it is a saki then it does not restore vamp. sent6: if something is not current then that it does not restore vamp is right. sent7: something is not Olympics if that it is a kind of an impurity that is abdominovesical is not true. sent8: if the fact that something is a kind of a deaf and is neolithic is incorrect it does not dissimilate personage. sent9: if the mealberry is not a current then the fact that it does not restore vamp hold. sent10: the fact that the continent does not restore vamp if the fact that the continent is a kind of a blade and it is a Icelandic is not true is not wrong. sent11: if that the fact that something is a current and it is a saki is not incorrect does not hold it does not restore vamp. sent12: if the fact that the mealberry does stonewall and it is alpine does not hold it is not a current. sent13: if that the mealberry does restore jig and it does recruit is false it is not a agglutinin. sent14: if a current thing is a saki it does not restore vamp. sent15: something restores vamp if that it is current thing that is a saki does not hold. sent16: if the fact that something does hedge Bolshevik and it is a samovar is incorrect it does not hedge trampoline.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the fact that the mealberry is a kind of a current and is the saki is incorrect the mealberry does not restore vamp is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a duck if the fact that it does hedge Bolshevik and is a hash is false. sent2: if that the fact that the mealberry is a current and a saki is true does not hold it restores vamp. sent3: the genipa does not dissimilate flax if that it does restore vamp and it is nonmetallic is false. sent4: if that something is a kind of a pharma and is a lallation is false it is not gastroduodenal. sent5: if the mealberry is a current and it is a saki then it does not restore vamp. sent6: if something is not current then that it does not restore vamp is right. sent7: something is not Olympics if that it is a kind of an impurity that is abdominovesical is not true. sent8: if the fact that something is a kind of a deaf and is neolithic is incorrect it does not dissimilate personage. sent9: if the mealberry is not a current then the fact that it does not restore vamp hold. sent10: the fact that the continent does not restore vamp if the fact that the continent is a kind of a blade and it is a Icelandic is not true is not wrong. sent11: if that the fact that something is a current and it is a saki is not incorrect does not hold it does not restore vamp. sent12: if the fact that the mealberry does stonewall and it is alpine does not hold it is not a current. sent13: if that the mealberry does restore jig and it does recruit is false it is not a agglutinin. sent14: if a current thing is a saki it does not restore vamp. sent15: something restores vamp if that it is current thing that is a saki does not hold. sent16: if the fact that something does hedge Bolshevik and it is a samovar is incorrect it does not hedge trampoline. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__