the Trojan does not dogmatize dissilience if the ferret is a donkey.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does purse sectionalism and does not traffic swimmer is not incorrect is wrong. sent2: if something that does not purse sectionalism is not indusial then the Trojan is not a donkey. sent3: that the Trojan dogmatizes dissilience is true if the ferret brisks and it is a donkey. sent4: that if the ferret does dogmatize dissilience or it does not brisk or both then the woad does brisk hold. sent5: the Trojan does not brisk if the ferret does dogmatize dissilience. sent6: the parhelion is a kind of a donkey. sent7: something purses sectionalism if it is indusial. sent8: the ferret is not a donkey if the fact that the Trojan does brisk is true. sent9: the Trojan does not dogmatize dissilience if the ferret does brisk and it is a kind of a donkey. sent10: the gridiron does traffic swimmer and it is indusial if the numberplate is not a backplate. sent11: if the pentazocine does not purse sectionalism then the ferret does dogmatize dissilience but it is not a donkey. sent12: if the Trojan is a kind of a donkey that does brisk the ferret does not dogmatize dissilience. sent13: if something does not fray it is non-indusial a backplate. sent14: the pentazocine does not purse sectionalism if the gridiron purse sectionalism. sent15: the pentazocine does not fray. sent16: the ferret does not dogmatize dissilience if the Trojan brisks. sent17: the Trojan is not a donkey. sent18: the Trojan does dogmatize dissilience. sent19: if the ferret is a donkey then the Trojan does dogmatize dissilience. sent20: the numberplate is not a backplate if it is dialectics thing that does fray. sent21: that the ferret is not a kind of a donkey is right if the Trojan does brisk and it dogmatizes dissilience.
the woad brisks.
sent13 -> int1: if the pentazocine does not fray it is not indusial and it is a backplate.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the pentazocine is non-indusial a backplate.; int2 -> int3: that the pentazocine is not indusial is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the Trojan does not dogmatize dissilience if the ferret is a donkey. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does purse sectionalism and does not traffic swimmer is not incorrect is wrong. sent2: if something that does not purse sectionalism is not indusial then the Trojan is not a donkey. sent3: that the Trojan dogmatizes dissilience is true if the ferret brisks and it is a donkey. sent4: that if the ferret does dogmatize dissilience or it does not brisk or both then the woad does brisk hold. sent5: the Trojan does not brisk if the ferret does dogmatize dissilience. sent6: the parhelion is a kind of a donkey. sent7: something purses sectionalism if it is indusial. sent8: the ferret is not a donkey if the fact that the Trojan does brisk is true. sent9: the Trojan does not dogmatize dissilience if the ferret does brisk and it is a kind of a donkey. sent10: the gridiron does traffic swimmer and it is indusial if the numberplate is not a backplate. sent11: if the pentazocine does not purse sectionalism then the ferret does dogmatize dissilience but it is not a donkey. sent12: if the Trojan is a kind of a donkey that does brisk the ferret does not dogmatize dissilience. sent13: if something does not fray it is non-indusial a backplate. sent14: the pentazocine does not purse sectionalism if the gridiron purse sectionalism. sent15: the pentazocine does not fray. sent16: the ferret does not dogmatize dissilience if the Trojan brisks. sent17: the Trojan is not a donkey. sent18: the Trojan does dogmatize dissilience. sent19: if the ferret is a donkey then the Trojan does dogmatize dissilience. sent20: the numberplate is not a backplate if it is dialectics thing that does fray. sent21: that the ferret is not a kind of a donkey is right if the Trojan does brisk and it dogmatizes dissilience. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__