the cyclist is a kind of non-immunocompetent thing that is antitypic.
sent1: the cyclist is not immunocompetent. sent2: if the jolly is antitypic then the cyclist is non-immunocompetent but it is antitypic. sent3: the chondrin is a iceboat if it is intertribal. sent4: the jolly is aneuploid if the rya is aneuploid. sent5: if the jolly is antitypic the cyclist is not immunocompetent. sent6: something is antitypic if it is aneuploid. sent7: if the bridoon is impure it does gallivant. sent8: that the rya is aneuploid is true. sent9: a non-inferior thing is metamorphic and/or is not aneuploid. sent10: if the chondrin is a kind of a iceboat then the samba either is not a kind of an inferior or is a kind of an approbation or both. sent11: if the rya is not aneuploid that the cyclist is not immunocompetent but antitypic is not correct.
sent6 -> int1: if the jolly is aneuploid it is antitypic.; sent4 & sent8 -> int2: the jolly is aneuploid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the jolly is antitypic.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cyclist is both not immunocompetent and antitypic is wrong.
sent9 -> int4: either the mediastinum is metamorphic or it is non-aneuploid or both if it is not inferior.;
$hypothesis$ = the cyclist is a kind of non-immunocompetent thing that is antitypic. ; $context$ = sent1: the cyclist is not immunocompetent. sent2: if the jolly is antitypic then the cyclist is non-immunocompetent but it is antitypic. sent3: the chondrin is a iceboat if it is intertribal. sent4: the jolly is aneuploid if the rya is aneuploid. sent5: if the jolly is antitypic the cyclist is not immunocompetent. sent6: something is antitypic if it is aneuploid. sent7: if the bridoon is impure it does gallivant. sent8: that the rya is aneuploid is true. sent9: a non-inferior thing is metamorphic and/or is not aneuploid. sent10: if the chondrin is a kind of a iceboat then the samba either is not a kind of an inferior or is a kind of an approbation or both. sent11: if the rya is not aneuploid that the cyclist is not immunocompetent but antitypic is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the jolly is aneuploid it is antitypic.; sent4 & sent8 -> int2: the jolly is aneuploid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the jolly is antitypic.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__