that the palisade is non-prescriptive thing that does not correspond Alisma is not correct.
sent1: the fact that the palisade does correspond Alisma and antisepticizes slenderness is not correct. sent2: that the moonshine does not zone husk and does not antisepticize slenderness is not right. sent3: the hammertoe does not correspond Alisma. sent4: the hammertoe is not prescriptive if the serosa is grateful but it is not actinomycetal. sent5: the fact that the serosa is a kind of grateful thing that does not antisepticize slenderness is not correct. sent6: the fact that the moonshine antisepticizes slenderness is not incorrect if that it does not zone husk and it does not antisepticizes slenderness is false. sent7: there exists something such that that it does antisepticize slenderness and it is not grateful is not true. sent8: the fact that the palisade is not prescriptive and it does not correspond Alisma is wrong if the hammertoe is not prescriptive. sent9: the moonshine does not antisepticize slenderness if there is something such that that it is grateful and is not actinomycetal is not right. sent10: something antisepticizes slenderness but it is not prescriptive. sent11: if the serosa does not antisepticize slenderness then that the moonshine does not antisepticize slenderness and is not prescriptive is not true. sent12: the serosa is not a formulary. sent13: that there is something such that it is a kind of prescriptive thing that does not correspond Alisma is right. sent14: if the hammertoe does not correspond Alisma then the fact that the palisade does not correspond Alisma and is prescriptive is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the serosa is grateful thing that is not actinomycetal is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is grateful and it is not actinomycetal is false.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the moonshine does not antisepticize slenderness.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: the moonshine does antisepticize slenderness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the serosa is grateful and is not actinomycetal.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the hammertoe is not prescriptive hold.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the palisade is non-prescriptive thing that does not correspond Alisma is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the palisade does correspond Alisma and antisepticizes slenderness is not correct. sent2: that the moonshine does not zone husk and does not antisepticize slenderness is not right. sent3: the hammertoe does not correspond Alisma. sent4: the hammertoe is not prescriptive if the serosa is grateful but it is not actinomycetal. sent5: the fact that the serosa is a kind of grateful thing that does not antisepticize slenderness is not correct. sent6: the fact that the moonshine antisepticizes slenderness is not incorrect if that it does not zone husk and it does not antisepticizes slenderness is false. sent7: there exists something such that that it does antisepticize slenderness and it is not grateful is not true. sent8: the fact that the palisade is not prescriptive and it does not correspond Alisma is wrong if the hammertoe is not prescriptive. sent9: the moonshine does not antisepticize slenderness if there is something such that that it is grateful and is not actinomycetal is not right. sent10: something antisepticizes slenderness but it is not prescriptive. sent11: if the serosa does not antisepticize slenderness then that the moonshine does not antisepticize slenderness and is not prescriptive is not true. sent12: the serosa is not a formulary. sent13: that there is something such that it is a kind of prescriptive thing that does not correspond Alisma is right. sent14: if the hammertoe does not correspond Alisma then the fact that the palisade does not correspond Alisma and is prescriptive is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the serosa is grateful thing that is not actinomycetal is not correct.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is grateful and it is not actinomycetal is false.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the moonshine does not antisepticize slenderness.; sent6 & sent2 -> int3: the moonshine does antisepticize slenderness.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the serosa is grateful and is not actinomycetal.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the hammertoe is not prescriptive hold.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__