the fact that there is something such that if that it is vibrational hold that it does not learn and is not a spectacle does not hold is not right.
sent1: the fact that the cachet does not learn and is not a spectacle does not hold if it is vibrational. sent2: if the cachet is an airforce the fact that it is a kind of a sawfly and it does not learn is wrong. sent3: if something is bivariate then that it is not a correlation and does not induce Salix is false. sent4: that the moonbeam is vibrational but it does not undercut peavey does not hold if it is consonantal. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a interestedness then that it is not a calk and is a hoot is not correct. sent6: that the cachet does not learn and is a spectacle does not hold if it is vibrational.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is bivariate the fact that it is not a correlation and it does not induce Salix is wrong.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the pyrene is not a correlation and does not induce Salix is false if it is bivariate.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is vibrational hold that it does not learn and is not a spectacle does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cachet does not learn and is not a spectacle does not hold if it is vibrational. sent2: if the cachet is an airforce the fact that it is a kind of a sawfly and it does not learn is wrong. sent3: if something is bivariate then that it is not a correlation and does not induce Salix is false. sent4: that the moonbeam is vibrational but it does not undercut peavey does not hold if it is consonantal. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a interestedness then that it is not a calk and is a hoot is not correct. sent6: that the cachet does not learn and is a spectacle does not hold if it is vibrational. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__