the fact that that the Machiavellian but not the callosotomy occurs is brought about by the non-auxinicness is not true.
sent1: that the cambering does not occur and the hoodooing Klimt does not occur is triggered by that the transeuntness occurs. sent2: if the decking popover does not occur the fact that the pushball happens and the phytotherapy does not occur is not true. sent3: the photosensitizing catfish does not occur if not the camber but the photosensitizing activism happens. sent4: if the auxinicness does not occur the callosotomy does not occur. sent5: that the perversion does not occur and the auxinicness does not occur does not hold if the photosensitizing catfish does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the Machiavellianness occurs but the callosotomy does not occur is wrong the auxinicness occurs. sent7: the decking popover does not occur if that the perversion does not occur and the auxinicness does not occur is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the Machiavellianness but not the callosotomy happens does not hold.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the auxinicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the auxinicness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the Machiavellianness happens and the callosotomy does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the pushball occurs but the phytotherapy does not occur is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the Machiavellian but not the callosotomy occurs is brought about by the non-auxinicness is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cambering does not occur and the hoodooing Klimt does not occur is triggered by that the transeuntness occurs. sent2: if the decking popover does not occur the fact that the pushball happens and the phytotherapy does not occur is not true. sent3: the photosensitizing catfish does not occur if not the camber but the photosensitizing activism happens. sent4: if the auxinicness does not occur the callosotomy does not occur. sent5: that the perversion does not occur and the auxinicness does not occur does not hold if the photosensitizing catfish does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the Machiavellianness occurs but the callosotomy does not occur is wrong the auxinicness occurs. sent7: the decking popover does not occur if that the perversion does not occur and the auxinicness does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the Machiavellianness but not the callosotomy happens does not hold.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the auxinicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the auxinicness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the Machiavellianness happens and the callosotomy does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__