that that the mihrab does acquaint Polynesian and it dogmatizes noticed is right is false.
sent1: the mihrab does acquaint Polynesian if the Khedive is Draconian. sent2: if something is non-Proustian thing that is a rounding it is nonslippery. sent3: if something is a kind of a pacesetter then the fact that it is both not a works and non-milch is not incorrect. sent4: the angiosperm is a kind of a pickings. sent5: if there exists something such that it acquaints Polynesian the angiosperm is Draconian and is a kind of a pacesetter. sent6: if the fact that something is both Draconian and not unorthodox is not correct then it is a kind of a pickings. sent7: if there is something such that it is nonslippery then the mihrab is astrophysical. sent8: if the Patella is a pickings then the mihrab is a kind of a pacesetter. sent9: the Khedive is unorthodox if the combustible is a pickings. sent10: if the Patella is astrophysical the fact that it is Draconian and it is orthodox is not true. sent11: if something is nonslippery then the mihrab dogmatizes noticed and it is astrophysical. sent12: if the angiosperm is a pacesetter then that the combustible is a kind of a pickings hold. sent13: if something is nonslippery then it is astrophysical. sent14: the bandoleer is milch if that the Patella is a cortisone and does not dogmatize yawner does not hold. sent15: if the bandoleer works then the angiosperm is a pacesetter. sent16: the fact that the Patella is a kind of a cortisone and does not dogmatize yawner is incorrect. sent17: if something is unorthodox it is Draconian. sent18: if the counselor does dogmatize yawner the Patella is nonslippery. sent19: the counselor is nonslippery. sent20: the Khedive is milch. sent21: if something is milch then it is a works. sent22: if something does not work then the fact that it does acquaint Polynesian and does dogmatize noticed is wrong.
sent14 & sent16 -> int1: the bandoleer is milch.; sent21 -> int2: if the bandoleer is milch then it does work.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bandoleer is a kind of a works.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the angiosperm is a kind of a pacesetter.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the combustible is a pickings.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the Khedive is unorthodox.; sent17 -> int7: if the Khedive is unorthodox it is Draconian.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Khedive is Draconian.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the mihrab does acquaint Polynesian.; sent19 -> int10: something is nonslippery.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the mihrab does dogmatize noticed and is astrophysical.; int11 -> int12: the mihrab does dogmatize noticed.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis;
that the mihrab does acquaint Polynesian and it dogmatizes noticed is not right.
sent22 -> int13: if the mihrab is not a works then the fact that it does acquaint Polynesian and does dogmatize noticed does not hold.; sent3 -> int14: if the mihrab is a pacesetter then it does not work and it is not milch.; sent6 -> int15: if the fact that the Patella is Draconian and is not unorthodox is not correct then the fact that it is a pickings hold.; sent13 -> int16: if the Patella is nonslippery it is astrophysical.; sent2 -> int17: the Patella is nonslippery if it is not Proustian and it rounds.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the mihrab does acquaint Polynesian and it dogmatizes noticed is right is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the mihrab does acquaint Polynesian if the Khedive is Draconian. sent2: if something is non-Proustian thing that is a rounding it is nonslippery. sent3: if something is a kind of a pacesetter then the fact that it is both not a works and non-milch is not incorrect. sent4: the angiosperm is a kind of a pickings. sent5: if there exists something such that it acquaints Polynesian the angiosperm is Draconian and is a kind of a pacesetter. sent6: if the fact that something is both Draconian and not unorthodox is not correct then it is a kind of a pickings. sent7: if there is something such that it is nonslippery then the mihrab is astrophysical. sent8: if the Patella is a pickings then the mihrab is a kind of a pacesetter. sent9: the Khedive is unorthodox if the combustible is a pickings. sent10: if the Patella is astrophysical the fact that it is Draconian and it is orthodox is not true. sent11: if something is nonslippery then the mihrab dogmatizes noticed and it is astrophysical. sent12: if the angiosperm is a pacesetter then that the combustible is a kind of a pickings hold. sent13: if something is nonslippery then it is astrophysical. sent14: the bandoleer is milch if that the Patella is a cortisone and does not dogmatize yawner does not hold. sent15: if the bandoleer works then the angiosperm is a pacesetter. sent16: the fact that the Patella is a kind of a cortisone and does not dogmatize yawner is incorrect. sent17: if something is unorthodox it is Draconian. sent18: if the counselor does dogmatize yawner the Patella is nonslippery. sent19: the counselor is nonslippery. sent20: the Khedive is milch. sent21: if something is milch then it is a works. sent22: if something does not work then the fact that it does acquaint Polynesian and does dogmatize noticed is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent16 -> int1: the bandoleer is milch.; sent21 -> int2: if the bandoleer is milch then it does work.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bandoleer is a kind of a works.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the angiosperm is a kind of a pacesetter.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the combustible is a pickings.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the Khedive is unorthodox.; sent17 -> int7: if the Khedive is unorthodox it is Draconian.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Khedive is Draconian.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the mihrab does acquaint Polynesian.; sent19 -> int10: something is nonslippery.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the mihrab does dogmatize noticed and is astrophysical.; int11 -> int12: the mihrab does dogmatize noticed.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__