if the ethicalness happens then the hornlessness occurs.
sent1: the boodle occurs and the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur. sent2: the boodle happens. sent3: if the rag does not occur then that the aid does not occur and the counting sub-test does not occur is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the aid does not occur and the counting sub-test does not occur is incorrect then the occlusion does not occur. sent5: if the aid does not occur the fact that the rag occurs and the counting sub-test occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the aid occurs then the occlusion does not occur. sent7: if the reluctance does not occur then the counting Newman and the ethicalness occurs. sent8: that the mindlessness but not the lexicographicness occurs prevents the non-hornlessness. sent9: that both the mindlessness and the non-lexicographicness happens is triggered by that the occlusion does not occur. sent10: the reluctance is brought about by that the boodle but not the will-o'-the-wisp occurs.
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: that the reluctance happens is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ethicalness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the reluctance and the ethicalness happens.;
the counting Newman happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the ethicalness happens then the hornlessness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the boodle occurs and the will-o'-the-wisp does not occur. sent2: the boodle happens. sent3: if the rag does not occur then that the aid does not occur and the counting sub-test does not occur is wrong. sent4: if the fact that the aid does not occur and the counting sub-test does not occur is incorrect then the occlusion does not occur. sent5: if the aid does not occur the fact that the rag occurs and the counting sub-test occurs is incorrect. sent6: if the aid occurs then the occlusion does not occur. sent7: if the reluctance does not occur then the counting Newman and the ethicalness occurs. sent8: that the mindlessness but not the lexicographicness occurs prevents the non-hornlessness. sent9: that both the mindlessness and the non-lexicographicness happens is triggered by that the occlusion does not occur. sent10: the reluctance is brought about by that the boodle but not the will-o'-the-wisp occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: that the reluctance happens is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ethicalness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the reluctance and the ethicalness happens.; __UNKNOWN__