the fact that the masquerader is not a materialism is correct.
sent1: there exists something such that it beholds Linnaeus and does not manacle. sent2: the masquerader is salty if there is something such that that it beholds Linnaeus and does not manacle is not right. sent3: the whittler is salty. sent4: if there exists something such that that it beholds Linnaeus and does not manacle is not correct then the return is a materialism. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it beholds Linnaeus and it is not salty is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it does behold Linnaeus and it does manacle is false. sent7: the return is salty. sent8: if something manacles the masquerader is salty. sent9: the masquerader beholds Linnaeus and it does manacle if the fact that the return is not salty is right. sent10: if the masquerader is salty it is a materialism. sent11: there is something such that it is not a Selma. sent12: that the return beholds Linnaeus and it manacles is not right. sent13: that something forwards but it is not a kind of a materialism is incorrect if it is a Selma. sent14: there is something such that it is a Selma. sent15: that the return does behold Linnaeus and manacles is not right if there exists something such that it is not a Selma. sent16: that the return does behold Linnaeus and does not manacle is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a Selma.
sent11 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the return does behold Linnaeus and does not manacle is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does behold Linnaeus and does not manacle is false.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the masquerader is salty.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the goatherd forwards but it is not a materialism is not correct.
sent13 -> int4: if the return is a kind of a Selma then that it is a forwarding that is not a materialism is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the masquerader is not a materialism is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it beholds Linnaeus and does not manacle. sent2: the masquerader is salty if there is something such that that it beholds Linnaeus and does not manacle is not right. sent3: the whittler is salty. sent4: if there exists something such that that it beholds Linnaeus and does not manacle is not correct then the return is a materialism. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it beholds Linnaeus and it is not salty is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it does behold Linnaeus and it does manacle is false. sent7: the return is salty. sent8: if something manacles the masquerader is salty. sent9: the masquerader beholds Linnaeus and it does manacle if the fact that the return is not salty is right. sent10: if the masquerader is salty it is a materialism. sent11: there is something such that it is not a Selma. sent12: that the return beholds Linnaeus and it manacles is not right. sent13: that something forwards but it is not a kind of a materialism is incorrect if it is a Selma. sent14: there is something such that it is a Selma. sent15: that the return does behold Linnaeus and manacles is not right if there exists something such that it is not a Selma. sent16: that the return does behold Linnaeus and does not manacle is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a Selma. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the return does behold Linnaeus and does not manacle is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does behold Linnaeus and does not manacle is false.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the masquerader is salty.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__