the toller is not a menace.
sent1: that the toller is hiplength is not wrong if the oscillator is a gynoecium and it does travesty pengo. sent2: if the oscillator is less and does not clank Godunov then the toller does travesty pengo. sent3: the fact that the toller is not a heteroploid is correct if it is a kind of a menace and it is hiplength. sent4: the toller is hiplength if the oscillator is a gynoecium and does not travesty pengo. sent5: something is not a Ariidae. sent6: if that the lamphouse is a kind of a gynoecium and is not a Ariidae does not hold the oscillator is a Ariidae. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a Ariidae then the oscillator is a gynoecium that does not travesty pengo. sent8: the stoker is a kind of a washtub but it is not a Principe if it is accusative. sent9: the oscillator is a kind of a heteroploid but it does not travesty pengo if there exists something such that it does not clank Godunov. sent10: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a gynoecium that is not a kind of a Ariidae is true does not hold if it travesties pengo. sent11: if the stoker is both not less and not a heteroploid then that the lamphouse is not a kind of a heteroploid hold. sent12: if something is not hiplength it travesties pengo and it is a kind of a Ariidae. sent13: the toller is a kind of a gynoecium but it is non-less if there exists something such that the fact that it is not hiplength is right. sent14: the toller is a menace if the oscillator is a kind of a Ariidae. sent15: if something does clank Godunov it is not less and it is not a heteroploid. sent16: something that is a washtub does clank Godunov. sent17: the toller is less and/or does not clank Godunov. sent18: if something is not non-less and/or it does not clank Godunov then it is a heteroploid. sent19: something travesties pengo and is hiplength if the fact that it is not a kind of a heteroploid hold.
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the oscillator is a gynoecium that does not travesty pengo.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the toller is hiplength.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toller is a kind of a menace.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the toller does menace and it is hiplength.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the toller is not a heteroploid.; sent18 -> int5: if either the toller is less or it does not clank Godunov or both it is a heteroploid.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the toller is a kind of a heteroploid.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the toller is a menace.
sent10 -> int8: that the lamphouse is a gynoecium and not a Ariidae is wrong if it travesties pengo.; sent19 -> int9: if the lamphouse is not a heteroploid it does travesty pengo and it is hiplength.; sent15 -> int10: the stoker is non-less and it is not a heteroploid if it does clank Godunov.; sent16 -> int11: if the stoker is a kind of a washtub it does clank Godunov.;
$hypothesis$ = the toller is not a menace. ; $context$ = sent1: that the toller is hiplength is not wrong if the oscillator is a gynoecium and it does travesty pengo. sent2: if the oscillator is less and does not clank Godunov then the toller does travesty pengo. sent3: the fact that the toller is not a heteroploid is correct if it is a kind of a menace and it is hiplength. sent4: the toller is hiplength if the oscillator is a gynoecium and does not travesty pengo. sent5: something is not a Ariidae. sent6: if that the lamphouse is a kind of a gynoecium and is not a Ariidae does not hold the oscillator is a Ariidae. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a Ariidae then the oscillator is a gynoecium that does not travesty pengo. sent8: the stoker is a kind of a washtub but it is not a Principe if it is accusative. sent9: the oscillator is a kind of a heteroploid but it does not travesty pengo if there exists something such that it does not clank Godunov. sent10: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a gynoecium that is not a kind of a Ariidae is true does not hold if it travesties pengo. sent11: if the stoker is both not less and not a heteroploid then that the lamphouse is not a kind of a heteroploid hold. sent12: if something is not hiplength it travesties pengo and it is a kind of a Ariidae. sent13: the toller is a kind of a gynoecium but it is non-less if there exists something such that the fact that it is not hiplength is right. sent14: the toller is a menace if the oscillator is a kind of a Ariidae. sent15: if something does clank Godunov it is not less and it is not a heteroploid. sent16: something that is a washtub does clank Godunov. sent17: the toller is less and/or does not clank Godunov. sent18: if something is not non-less and/or it does not clank Godunov then it is a heteroploid. sent19: something travesties pengo and is hiplength if the fact that it is not a kind of a heteroploid hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the oscillator is a gynoecium that does not travesty pengo.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the toller is hiplength.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the toller is a kind of a menace.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the toller does menace and it is hiplength.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the toller is not a heteroploid.; sent18 -> int5: if either the toller is less or it does not clank Godunov or both it is a heteroploid.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the toller is a kind of a heteroploid.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__