the Protropin does not lap potlatch.
sent1: the fact that the links is not saprobic and it is not a scrubber is false if the diocesan is not a kind of a breakable. sent2: something disrespects bunchberry if it is not a Mithraist and/or it is an insecticide. sent3: if the oilstone is not blastoporal the fact that the Protropin does not lap potlatch is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that that it whangs Testudo and it laps angst is wrong. sent5: if the diocesan is not a waterline either it is not a Mithraist or it is a kind of an insecticide or both. sent6: something is not a breakable if it disrespects bunchberry. sent7: if the iva does not whang balderdash then the fact that the foreigner is not a kind of a Tacitus and is a detumescence is not right. sent8: the diocesan is not a waterline. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it does whang Testudo and does lap angst does not hold the exoskeleton does not lap angst. sent10: the diocesan does lap potlatch. sent11: if that the diocesan does not disrespect bunchberry but it is saprobic is false the Protropin does not disrespect bunchberry. sent12: the fact that something is a scrubber that does not melanize if it is not blastoporal is not wrong. sent13: if that the foreigner is not a Tacitus but a detumescence is false then the oilstone is not a detumescence. sent14: if there is something such that that it is not saprobic and is not a scrubber does not hold then the block does melanize. sent15: if the exoskeleton does not lap angst the iva does not whang balderdash. sent16: the fact that the links is saprobic but it is not a scrubber is not correct. sent17: something that is a scrubber that does not melanize is not breakable. sent18: the brogan is evangelical. sent19: if that the block melanizes is correct then the oilstone is not blastoporal. sent20: if that something melanizes and it is a waterline is false then it does not melanizes. sent21: if the Protropin is not a cut it is not a kind of a Mithraist and/or it laps Thatcherite. sent22: if there exists something such that that it is not a detumescence is not wrong the fact that the block disrespects age and is blastoporal is not right.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the diocesan is not a Mithraist and/or is a kind of an insecticide.; sent2 -> int2: if the diocesan is not a kind of a Mithraist and/or is an insecticide it does disrespect bunchberry.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the diocesan does disrespect bunchberry.; sent6 -> int4: if the diocesan disrespects bunchberry then it is not a breakable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the diocesan is not breakable.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: that the links is a kind of non-saprobic thing that is not a scrubber is incorrect.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not saprobic and it is not a scrubber does not hold.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the block melanizes.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the oilstone is not blastoporal.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the Protropin laps potlatch.
sent17 -> int10: if the links is a scrubber but it does not melanize then it is not a kind of a breakable.; sent12 -> int11: if the links is not blastoporal it is a kind of a scrubber and it does not melanize.; sent4 & sent9 -> int12: the exoskeleton does not lap angst.; sent15 & int12 -> int13: the iva does not whang balderdash.; sent7 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the foreigner is not a Tacitus but it is a kind of a detumescence does not hold.; sent13 & int14 -> int15: the oilstone is not a kind of a detumescence.; int15 -> int16: something is not a detumescence.; int16 & sent22 -> int17: the fact that the block disrespects age and is blastoporal is incorrect.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that that it does disrespect age and is blastoporal is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the Protropin does not lap potlatch. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the links is not saprobic and it is not a scrubber is false if the diocesan is not a kind of a breakable. sent2: something disrespects bunchberry if it is not a Mithraist and/or it is an insecticide. sent3: if the oilstone is not blastoporal the fact that the Protropin does not lap potlatch is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that that it whangs Testudo and it laps angst is wrong. sent5: if the diocesan is not a waterline either it is not a Mithraist or it is a kind of an insecticide or both. sent6: something is not a breakable if it disrespects bunchberry. sent7: if the iva does not whang balderdash then the fact that the foreigner is not a kind of a Tacitus and is a detumescence is not right. sent8: the diocesan is not a waterline. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it does whang Testudo and does lap angst does not hold the exoskeleton does not lap angst. sent10: the diocesan does lap potlatch. sent11: if that the diocesan does not disrespect bunchberry but it is saprobic is false the Protropin does not disrespect bunchberry. sent12: the fact that something is a scrubber that does not melanize if it is not blastoporal is not wrong. sent13: if that the foreigner is not a Tacitus but a detumescence is false then the oilstone is not a detumescence. sent14: if there is something such that that it is not saprobic and is not a scrubber does not hold then the block does melanize. sent15: if the exoskeleton does not lap angst the iva does not whang balderdash. sent16: the fact that the links is saprobic but it is not a scrubber is not correct. sent17: something that is a scrubber that does not melanize is not breakable. sent18: the brogan is evangelical. sent19: if that the block melanizes is correct then the oilstone is not blastoporal. sent20: if that something melanizes and it is a waterline is false then it does not melanizes. sent21: if the Protropin is not a cut it is not a kind of a Mithraist and/or it laps Thatcherite. sent22: if there exists something such that that it is not a detumescence is not wrong the fact that the block disrespects age and is blastoporal is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the diocesan is not a Mithraist and/or is a kind of an insecticide.; sent2 -> int2: if the diocesan is not a kind of a Mithraist and/or is an insecticide it does disrespect bunchberry.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the diocesan does disrespect bunchberry.; sent6 -> int4: if the diocesan disrespects bunchberry then it is not a breakable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the diocesan is not breakable.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: that the links is a kind of non-saprobic thing that is not a scrubber is incorrect.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not saprobic and it is not a scrubber does not hold.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the block melanizes.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the oilstone is not blastoporal.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__