the quarantining happens and the depopulating occurs.
sent1: if both the non-ugliness and the ictalness occurs that the quarantine occurs is not false. sent2: the bubbling foot occurs. sent3: the fact that the fact that both the quarantine and the depopulating occurs is not wrong is not right if the indiscernibleness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the ugliness does not occur but the ictalness happens is not incorrect. sent5: the spieling snakewood and the depopulating occurs if that the indiscernibleness does not occur is right. sent6: the indiscernibleness and the depopulating happens. sent7: the ugliness does not occur. sent8: that the quarantining happens is not wrong if both the ugliness and the ictalness occurs.
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the quarantining happens.; sent6 -> int2: the depopulating occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the spieling snakewood and the archaisticness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the quarantining happens and the depopulating occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if both the non-ugliness and the ictalness occurs that the quarantine occurs is not false. sent2: the bubbling foot occurs. sent3: the fact that the fact that both the quarantine and the depopulating occurs is not wrong is not right if the indiscernibleness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the ugliness does not occur but the ictalness happens is not incorrect. sent5: the spieling snakewood and the depopulating occurs if that the indiscernibleness does not occur is right. sent6: the indiscernibleness and the depopulating happens. sent7: the ugliness does not occur. sent8: that the quarantining happens is not wrong if both the ugliness and the ictalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the quarantining happens.; sent6 -> int2: the depopulating occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__