the hindquarter is not unitary but it is a midnight.
sent1: everything does not ban abaca and is not ornithological. sent2: if the fact that the sprinkler is not a headlinese and it is not a kind of a LTTE is not correct the cachalot is an ageratum. sent3: the stacker is not a arpeggio but it lobs catacomb. sent4: the lactifuge is not a kind of a chili if the goddaughter does not ban abaca and is not ornithological. sent5: if the cachalot is an ageratum then the tare does not ban moderationism. sent6: the fact that the sprinkler is not a headlinese and is not a kind of a LTTE is not true if the lactifuge is not a chili. sent7: the hindquarter is a midnight if the stacker is not a kind of a arpeggio but it lobs catacomb. sent8: if the tare does not ban moderationism the hindquarter is not unitary.
sent1 -> int1: the goddaughter does not ban abaca and it is not ornithological.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the lactifuge is not a chili.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that the sprinkler is not a headlinese and is not a kind of a LTTE is not correct.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the cachalot is an ageratum.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the tare does not ban moderationism.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the hindquarter is not unitary.; sent7 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the hindquarter is a midnight is correct.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the hindquarter is not unitary but it is a midnight. ; $context$ = sent1: everything does not ban abaca and is not ornithological. sent2: if the fact that the sprinkler is not a headlinese and it is not a kind of a LTTE is not correct the cachalot is an ageratum. sent3: the stacker is not a arpeggio but it lobs catacomb. sent4: the lactifuge is not a kind of a chili if the goddaughter does not ban abaca and is not ornithological. sent5: if the cachalot is an ageratum then the tare does not ban moderationism. sent6: the fact that the sprinkler is not a headlinese and is not a kind of a LTTE is not true if the lactifuge is not a chili. sent7: the hindquarter is a midnight if the stacker is not a kind of a arpeggio but it lobs catacomb. sent8: if the tare does not ban moderationism the hindquarter is not unitary. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the goddaughter does not ban abaca and it is not ornithological.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the lactifuge is not a chili.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that the sprinkler is not a headlinese and is not a kind of a LTTE is not correct.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the cachalot is an ageratum.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the tare does not ban moderationism.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the hindquarter is not unitary.; sent7 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the hindquarter is a midnight is correct.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__