not the tasting diplotene but the tasting Light happens.
sent1: the measurement occurs if the ablactation happens. sent2: the guttering Oviedo does not occur and the measurement occurs. sent3: the authorship occurs. sent4: the tasting Light occurs. sent5: that not the guttering Oviedo but the measurement occurs is false if the Aleutiansness occurs. sent6: not the battledore but the rip occurs. sent7: if the tasting diplotene occurs then the Aleutiansness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tasting diplotene happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Aleutiansness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the guttering Oviedo does not occur and the measurement occurs does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tasting diplotene does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tasting diplotene does not occur but the tasting Light occurs is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = not the tasting diplotene but the tasting Light happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the measurement occurs if the ablactation happens. sent2: the guttering Oviedo does not occur and the measurement occurs. sent3: the authorship occurs. sent4: the tasting Light occurs. sent5: that not the guttering Oviedo but the measurement occurs is false if the Aleutiansness occurs. sent6: not the battledore but the rip occurs. sent7: if the tasting diplotene occurs then the Aleutiansness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tasting diplotene happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Aleutiansness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the guttering Oviedo does not occur and the measurement occurs does not hold.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tasting diplotene does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__