there exists something such that if it is a texture then the fact that it is a kind of a skittishness and it does not contemplate ogress is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is nontranslational then the fact that it does aspire and is not a Matakam is false. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kina then the fact that it is both a cefuroxime and not a stadium is not right. sent3: if the tearaway is a texture then it is a skittishness that does not contemplate ogress. sent4: if something does hop then that it is a skittishness and it is not a kind of a Azerbaijani does not hold. sent5: if the tearaway is a kind of a Cornwall then the fact that it is dorsal and proprietary is false. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a disambiguator then the fact that it is dorsal and is not a Azerbaijani is wrong. sent7: if the lota does push tearaway then that it is a kind of a consistory and it is a kind of a skittishness does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is a compensation that it is a kind of a fanion and it straightens Serer is incorrect. sent9: if the tearaway is a texture then that it is a skittishness that does not contemplate ogress is not right.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
if the tearaway is a hop then that it is a kind of a skittishness that is not a kind of a Azerbaijani is not right.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a texture then the fact that it is a kind of a skittishness and it does not contemplate ogress is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is nontranslational then the fact that it does aspire and is not a Matakam is false. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kina then the fact that it is both a cefuroxime and not a stadium is not right. sent3: if the tearaway is a texture then it is a skittishness that does not contemplate ogress. sent4: if something does hop then that it is a skittishness and it is not a kind of a Azerbaijani does not hold. sent5: if the tearaway is a kind of a Cornwall then the fact that it is dorsal and proprietary is false. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a disambiguator then the fact that it is dorsal and is not a Azerbaijani is wrong. sent7: if the lota does push tearaway then that it is a kind of a consistory and it is a kind of a skittishness does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is a compensation that it is a kind of a fanion and it straightens Serer is incorrect. sent9: if the tearaway is a texture then that it is a skittishness that does not contemplate ogress is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__