the canting does not occur.
sent1: both the messaging and the concurring happens if the nontoxicness does not occur. sent2: that the therapeuticsness occurs is brought about by that the shellfire happens. sent3: if the concurring does not occur both the messaging and the non-therapeuticsness occurs. sent4: the shellfire occurs. sent5: the badminton does not occur. sent6: the nontoxicness does not occur. sent7: that the messaging does not occur is caused by that both the cant and the therapeuticsness happens. sent8: that the non-mayoralness and the toxicness happens is incorrect if the ELINT occurs.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the therapeuticsness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cant occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the cant and the therapeuticsness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the messaging does not occur.; sent1 & sent6 -> int4: both the messaging and the concurring occurs.; int4 -> int5: the messaging happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the cant happens.
$hypothesis$ = the canting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the messaging and the concurring happens if the nontoxicness does not occur. sent2: that the therapeuticsness occurs is brought about by that the shellfire happens. sent3: if the concurring does not occur both the messaging and the non-therapeuticsness occurs. sent4: the shellfire occurs. sent5: the badminton does not occur. sent6: the nontoxicness does not occur. sent7: that the messaging does not occur is caused by that both the cant and the therapeuticsness happens. sent8: that the non-mayoralness and the toxicness happens is incorrect if the ELINT occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the therapeuticsness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cant occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the cant and the therapeuticsness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the messaging does not occur.; sent1 & sent6 -> int4: both the messaging and the concurring occurs.; int4 -> int5: the messaging happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__