the contamination does not describe Ictiobus and it is not lysogenic.
sent1: that the contamination is not nasopharyngeal and is not lysogenic does not hold. sent2: something is a kind of a VCR if it is a representative. sent3: the Igbo does not hollow and it is not a VCR. sent4: if the fact that the y-axis is not a kind of a TAT and is not a VCR is wrong then it is not horary. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a twin and it is not a tongue is not wrong if it is a VCR. sent6: the chariot is a graviton if it does not negotiate and is not cursorial. sent7: if something is not a tongue the fact that it is not a conditioner and it does not twin does not hold. sent8: the contamination is a kind of non-chyliferous thing that is not a kind of a dossal. sent9: the anapsid is representative or it cleans fugleman or both if there is something such that it does not clean horoscope. sent10: the fact that the contamination is not a tongue hold. sent11: the fact that something is a VCR is true if it does clean fugleman. sent12: the fact that the bilby is subarctic and does not describe Ictiobus is false. sent13: that the modifier is familiar thing that is a whipper-in is wrong. sent14: the fibrin tongues. sent15: the contamination is a twin if it is not a VCR and it is not a tongue. sent16: the contamination is not a VCR and it is not a tongue. sent17: the contamination is not normative and does not clean linac. sent18: the modifier does not clean horoscope if that it is familiar a whipper-in is false. sent19: the contamination is not a tongue and not arthrosporic. sent20: the fugleman is not a kind of a tongue. sent21: if that the contamination does not describe Ictiobus and it is not lysogenic does not hold it is not a kind of a twin.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the contamination does not describe Ictiobus and is not lysogenic does not hold.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the contamination does not twin.; sent15 & sent16 -> int2: the contamination is a twin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the contamination does not describe Ictiobus and it is non-lysogenic is not right.
sent5 -> int4: if the anapsid is a VCR it is both not a twin and not a tongue.; sent18 & sent13 -> int5: the modifier does not clean horoscope.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not clean horoscope.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the anapsid is representative and/or does clean fugleman.; sent2 -> int8: the anapsid is a VCR if it is a representative.; sent11 -> int9: the anapsid is a VCR if it does clean fugleman.; int7 & int8 & int9 -> int10: the anapsid is a VCR.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the anapsid is not a twin and it is not a tongue.; int11 -> int12: the fact that the anapsid is not a tongue hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not a tongue.;
$hypothesis$ = the contamination does not describe Ictiobus and it is not lysogenic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the contamination is not nasopharyngeal and is not lysogenic does not hold. sent2: something is a kind of a VCR if it is a representative. sent3: the Igbo does not hollow and it is not a VCR. sent4: if the fact that the y-axis is not a kind of a TAT and is not a VCR is wrong then it is not horary. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a twin and it is not a tongue is not wrong if it is a VCR. sent6: the chariot is a graviton if it does not negotiate and is not cursorial. sent7: if something is not a tongue the fact that it is not a conditioner and it does not twin does not hold. sent8: the contamination is a kind of non-chyliferous thing that is not a kind of a dossal. sent9: the anapsid is representative or it cleans fugleman or both if there is something such that it does not clean horoscope. sent10: the fact that the contamination is not a tongue hold. sent11: the fact that something is a VCR is true if it does clean fugleman. sent12: the fact that the bilby is subarctic and does not describe Ictiobus is false. sent13: that the modifier is familiar thing that is a whipper-in is wrong. sent14: the fibrin tongues. sent15: the contamination is a twin if it is not a VCR and it is not a tongue. sent16: the contamination is not a VCR and it is not a tongue. sent17: the contamination is not normative and does not clean linac. sent18: the modifier does not clean horoscope if that it is familiar a whipper-in is false. sent19: the contamination is not a tongue and not arthrosporic. sent20: the fugleman is not a kind of a tongue. sent21: if that the contamination does not describe Ictiobus and it is not lysogenic does not hold it is not a kind of a twin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the contamination does not describe Ictiobus and is not lysogenic does not hold.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the contamination does not twin.; sent15 & sent16 -> int2: the contamination is a twin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__