the level does quilt.
sent1: that the businesswoman is not a Willebrand but it is a question hold if something copies carefulness. sent2: if something does dominate Avon then it is a marker. sent3: if that something is proportionate but it is not a Chondrus does not hold then it is non-microsomal. sent4: the fact that the fact that something is proportionate but it is not a kind of a Chondrus is false if it is not a Microsporum is true. sent5: the absinth does dominate Avon if there exists something such that it dominates exocrine. sent6: the absinth is not a Microsporum if the barrow is a expiation. sent7: if the vinaigrette is not a Willebrand the barrow is a expiation and/or it is micrometeoritic. sent8: the level is not non-microsomal. sent9: if the businesswoman is not a Willebrand and is a kind of a question the fact that the vinaigrette is not a Willebrand hold. sent10: if something does dominate Avon it does dominate exocrine. sent11: if the absinth is not microsomal that the level is not a marker hold. sent12: if the velour does dominate Einthoven then it does copy Avignon. sent13: the velour copies carefulness if it copies Avignon. sent14: the velour does dominate Einthoven. sent15: if the absinth is microsomal the level is not a quilt. sent16: there is something such that it dominates exocrine. sent17: something is a quilt if it does dominate exocrine. sent18: if the absinth either is microsomal or is a marker or both the level does not quilt.
sent16 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the absinth dominates Avon is correct.; sent2 -> int2: if the absinth dominates Avon then it is a marker.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the absinth is a marker is not false.; int3 -> int4: either the absinth is microsomal or it is a marker or both.; int4 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the level is a quilt.
sent17 -> int5: the level is a kind of a quilt if it dominates exocrine.; sent10 -> int6: the level does dominate exocrine if it does dominate Avon.; sent3 -> int7: if the fact that the absinth is both proportionate and not a Chondrus is incorrect it is not microsomal.; sent4 -> int8: the fact that the absinth is both proportionate and not a Chondrus does not hold if it is not a Microsporum.; sent12 & sent14 -> int9: the velour does copy Avignon.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the velour copies carefulness.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it does copy carefulness.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the businesswoman is not a Willebrand but it questions.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: the vinaigrette is not a Willebrand.; sent7 & int13 -> int14: either the barrow is a kind of a expiation or it is micrometeoritic or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the level does quilt. ; $context$ = sent1: that the businesswoman is not a Willebrand but it is a question hold if something copies carefulness. sent2: if something does dominate Avon then it is a marker. sent3: if that something is proportionate but it is not a Chondrus does not hold then it is non-microsomal. sent4: the fact that the fact that something is proportionate but it is not a kind of a Chondrus is false if it is not a Microsporum is true. sent5: the absinth does dominate Avon if there exists something such that it dominates exocrine. sent6: the absinth is not a Microsporum if the barrow is a expiation. sent7: if the vinaigrette is not a Willebrand the barrow is a expiation and/or it is micrometeoritic. sent8: the level is not non-microsomal. sent9: if the businesswoman is not a Willebrand and is a kind of a question the fact that the vinaigrette is not a Willebrand hold. sent10: if something does dominate Avon it does dominate exocrine. sent11: if the absinth is not microsomal that the level is not a marker hold. sent12: if the velour does dominate Einthoven then it does copy Avignon. sent13: the velour copies carefulness if it copies Avignon. sent14: the velour does dominate Einthoven. sent15: if the absinth is microsomal the level is not a quilt. sent16: there is something such that it dominates exocrine. sent17: something is a quilt if it does dominate exocrine. sent18: if the absinth either is microsomal or is a marker or both the level does not quilt. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the absinth dominates Avon is correct.; sent2 -> int2: if the absinth dominates Avon then it is a marker.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the absinth is a marker is not false.; int3 -> int4: either the absinth is microsomal or it is a marker or both.; int4 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__