the hydromel is multilane.
sent1: that there exists something such that it is non-interdepartmental thing that does not unsaddle is not incorrect. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not boskopoid and does not demagnetize sphygmomanometer is not right then the sphygmomanometer is not a kind of a Helichrysum. sent3: if something is not tasteful and/or it is not a Helichrysum then the hogfish suckles doppelganger. sent4: if there is something such that it is not multilane and/or it is not tasteful the sphygmomanometer is a Helichrysum. sent5: the hydromel is tasteful and/or is not boskopoid. sent6: the fact that that that the hydromel is not boskopoid and does not demagnetize sphygmomanometer is wrong is not wrong if that the hydromel is multilane is true is not wrong. sent7: The doppelganger does not suckle hogfish. sent8: the hydromel does zone. sent9: the hogfish does not suckle doppelganger.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hydromel is multilane.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hydromel is a kind of non-boskopoid thing that does not demagnetize sphygmomanometer is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not boskopoid and it does not demagnetize sphygmomanometer is not right.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the sphygmomanometer is not a Helichrysum.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the sphygmomanometer either is not tasteful or is not a Helichrysum or both hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that either it is not tasteful or it is not a Helichrysum or both.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the hogfish does suckle doppelganger is not false.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the hydromel is multilane. ; $context$ = sent1: that there exists something such that it is non-interdepartmental thing that does not unsaddle is not incorrect. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not boskopoid and does not demagnetize sphygmomanometer is not right then the sphygmomanometer is not a kind of a Helichrysum. sent3: if something is not tasteful and/or it is not a Helichrysum then the hogfish suckles doppelganger. sent4: if there is something such that it is not multilane and/or it is not tasteful the sphygmomanometer is a Helichrysum. sent5: the hydromel is tasteful and/or is not boskopoid. sent6: the fact that that that the hydromel is not boskopoid and does not demagnetize sphygmomanometer is wrong is not wrong if that the hydromel is multilane is true is not wrong. sent7: The doppelganger does not suckle hogfish. sent8: the hydromel does zone. sent9: the hogfish does not suckle doppelganger. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hydromel is multilane.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hydromel is a kind of non-boskopoid thing that does not demagnetize sphygmomanometer is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not boskopoid and it does not demagnetize sphygmomanometer is not right.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the sphygmomanometer is not a Helichrysum.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the sphygmomanometer either is not tasteful or is not a Helichrysum or both hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that either it is not tasteful or it is not a Helichrysum or both.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the fact that the hogfish does suckle doppelganger is not false.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__