the rambler does not glare lumpfish.
sent1: if something is not a hitter it is not sectorial. sent2: there is something such that it does not concoct IDF. sent3: something does not glare lumpfish if that it is meiotic and glare lumpfish is not right. sent4: the tallith is a kind of an elastic. sent5: something that is non-meiotic and a quaver does not glare lumpfish. sent6: if something is not sectorial and/or does not concoct IDF then the fact that the overcompensation is not a quaver hold. sent7: if something does not quaver then that it is meiotic and glares lumpfish is false. sent8: the overcompensation is not heliocentric if that the fact that the aecium is energetic and is a kind of a seamount is not correct is right. sent9: there exists something such that it is bionic and it is wiry. sent10: the rambler is elastic. sent11: the fact that the aecium is energetic and it is a seamount is wrong if the drogue is not a kind of a groove. sent12: if something is not heliocentric it is a hitter and a shaver. sent13: the fact that the rambler does glare lumpfish hold if there exists something such that it is not floricultural. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of floricultural thing that is elastic does not hold. sent15: the rambler is a Indra. sent16: something is both floricultural and an elastic. sent17: if the fact that the overcompensation is not a quaver but it is a kind of a hitter is not false then that the rambler is not a quaver is correct. sent18: if the saltbox is not an escalation the drogue is a kind of a pekoe but it is not a groove. sent19: the oximeter does not concoct IDF. sent20: if there is something such that that it is a kind of floricultural thing that is an elastic is not right the rambler glares lumpfish.
sent14 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the rambler does not glare lumpfish.
sent3 -> int1: if that the rambler is meiotic and does glare lumpfish is false it does not glare lumpfish.; sent7 -> int2: if the rambler is not a quaver that it is meiotic and it does glare lumpfish is not correct.; sent19 -> int3: the oximeter either is not sectorial or does not concoct IDF or both.; int3 -> int4: something is not sectorial and/or it does not concoct IDF.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the overcompensation is not a quaver.; sent12 -> int6: the overcompensation is a kind of a hitter and it is a shaver if it is not heliocentric.;
$hypothesis$ = the rambler does not glare lumpfish. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a hitter it is not sectorial. sent2: there is something such that it does not concoct IDF. sent3: something does not glare lumpfish if that it is meiotic and glare lumpfish is not right. sent4: the tallith is a kind of an elastic. sent5: something that is non-meiotic and a quaver does not glare lumpfish. sent6: if something is not sectorial and/or does not concoct IDF then the fact that the overcompensation is not a quaver hold. sent7: if something does not quaver then that it is meiotic and glares lumpfish is false. sent8: the overcompensation is not heliocentric if that the fact that the aecium is energetic and is a kind of a seamount is not correct is right. sent9: there exists something such that it is bionic and it is wiry. sent10: the rambler is elastic. sent11: the fact that the aecium is energetic and it is a seamount is wrong if the drogue is not a kind of a groove. sent12: if something is not heliocentric it is a hitter and a shaver. sent13: the fact that the rambler does glare lumpfish hold if there exists something such that it is not floricultural. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of floricultural thing that is elastic does not hold. sent15: the rambler is a Indra. sent16: something is both floricultural and an elastic. sent17: if the fact that the overcompensation is not a quaver but it is a kind of a hitter is not false then that the rambler is not a quaver is correct. sent18: if the saltbox is not an escalation the drogue is a kind of a pekoe but it is not a groove. sent19: the oximeter does not concoct IDF. sent20: if there is something such that that it is a kind of floricultural thing that is an elastic is not right the rambler glares lumpfish. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__