the snuffling patroness happens if the uprightness occurs.
sent1: if the uprightness occurs the fact that the toplessness and the non-expensiveness occurs is wrong. sent2: the invoking does not occur if that either the alchemisticness happens or the Kafkaesqueness does not occur or both is not right. sent3: the snuffling patroness does not occur if the fact that the snuffling blindfold occurs or the reciprocating demagoguery happens or both is not false. sent4: the shaking occurs. sent5: that the snuffling GHB happens is caused by that the toplessness occurs. sent6: the fact that the competentness but not the anatropousness happens does not hold if that the snuffling GHB happens is correct. sent7: if the shaking happens then that the alchemisticness and/or the non-Kafkaesqueness happens is wrong. sent8: that the Jewishness and the inexhaustibleness occurs is triggered by that the invoking does not occur. sent9: that the cecalness occurs and the succussion happens prevents that the metacentricness happens. sent10: the non-metacentricness yields that the reciprocating demagoguery and the trespassing occurs. sent11: the toplessness occurs if the fact that the hugging liberty does not occur and the toplessness does not occur is incorrect. sent12: if the slack does not occur the cecalness happens and the hugging sporophore occurs. sent13: the fact that both the toplessness and the expensiveness occurs is not right if the upright occurs. sent14: that the reciprocating granary happens and the upright occurs is triggered by that the snuffling patroness does not occur. sent15: the expensiveness does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the competentness but not the anatropousness occurs is not correct the slack does not occur. sent17: that the snuffling farmhand does not occur and/or that the reciprocating croupier does not occur causes that the succussion occurs. sent18: that the snuffling farmhand does not occur and/or that the reciprocating croupier does not occur is triggered by the inexhaustibleness. sent19: that both the toplessness and the expensiveness happens is false. sent20: if the expensiveness happens the snuffling patroness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uprightness occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the toplessness happens but the expensiveness does not occur is not correct.;
the reciprocating granary occurs.
sent7 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the alchemisticness occurs or the Kafkaesqueness does not occur or both does not hold.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the invoking does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the Jewishness occurs and the inexhaustibleness happens.; int4 -> int5: the inexhaustibleness occurs.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the snuffling farmhand does not occur or the reciprocating croupier does not occur or both.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: the succussion occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the snuffling patroness happens if the uprightness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the uprightness occurs the fact that the toplessness and the non-expensiveness occurs is wrong. sent2: the invoking does not occur if that either the alchemisticness happens or the Kafkaesqueness does not occur or both is not right. sent3: the snuffling patroness does not occur if the fact that the snuffling blindfold occurs or the reciprocating demagoguery happens or both is not false. sent4: the shaking occurs. sent5: that the snuffling GHB happens is caused by that the toplessness occurs. sent6: the fact that the competentness but not the anatropousness happens does not hold if that the snuffling GHB happens is correct. sent7: if the shaking happens then that the alchemisticness and/or the non-Kafkaesqueness happens is wrong. sent8: that the Jewishness and the inexhaustibleness occurs is triggered by that the invoking does not occur. sent9: that the cecalness occurs and the succussion happens prevents that the metacentricness happens. sent10: the non-metacentricness yields that the reciprocating demagoguery and the trespassing occurs. sent11: the toplessness occurs if the fact that the hugging liberty does not occur and the toplessness does not occur is incorrect. sent12: if the slack does not occur the cecalness happens and the hugging sporophore occurs. sent13: the fact that both the toplessness and the expensiveness occurs is not right if the upright occurs. sent14: that the reciprocating granary happens and the upright occurs is triggered by that the snuffling patroness does not occur. sent15: the expensiveness does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the competentness but not the anatropousness occurs is not correct the slack does not occur. sent17: that the snuffling farmhand does not occur and/or that the reciprocating croupier does not occur causes that the succussion occurs. sent18: that the snuffling farmhand does not occur and/or that the reciprocating croupier does not occur is triggered by the inexhaustibleness. sent19: that both the toplessness and the expensiveness happens is false. sent20: if the expensiveness happens the snuffling patroness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uprightness occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the toplessness happens but the expensiveness does not occur is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__