that both the suggesting brandy and the impeding pulpwood occurs does not hold.
sent1: the shoeshine and the cervicalness occurs if the scrapping does not occur. sent2: the scrap does not occur. sent3: that the suggesting brandy happens is true if both the anthropolatry and the non-literalness happens. sent4: that the suggesting psephology does not occur leads to that the impeding pulpwood happens and the discrimination happens. sent5: that both the abstractness and the non-emptyingness occurs prevents the non-pharmaceuticalness. sent6: the non-monotheisticness results in that both the anthropolatry and the non-literalness happens. sent7: the infiniteness but not the shoeshine happens if the monotheisticness occurs. sent8: the suggesting psephology does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the monotheisticness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the infiniteness occurs but the shoeshine does not occur.; int1 -> int2: that the shoeshine does not occur is not wrong.; sent1 & sent2 -> int3: the shoeshine and the cervicalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the shoeshine happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the monotheisticness does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the anthropolatry but not the literalness occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the suggesting brandy occurs.; sent4 & sent8 -> int9: the impeding pulpwood happens and the discrimination happens.; int9 -> int10: the impeding pulpwood happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the suggesting brandy happens and the impeding pulpwood occurs is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the suggesting brandy and the impeding pulpwood occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the shoeshine and the cervicalness occurs if the scrapping does not occur. sent2: the scrap does not occur. sent3: that the suggesting brandy happens is true if both the anthropolatry and the non-literalness happens. sent4: that the suggesting psephology does not occur leads to that the impeding pulpwood happens and the discrimination happens. sent5: that both the abstractness and the non-emptyingness occurs prevents the non-pharmaceuticalness. sent6: the non-monotheisticness results in that both the anthropolatry and the non-literalness happens. sent7: the infiniteness but not the shoeshine happens if the monotheisticness occurs. sent8: the suggesting psephology does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the monotheisticness happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the infiniteness occurs but the shoeshine does not occur.; int1 -> int2: that the shoeshine does not occur is not wrong.; sent1 & sent2 -> int3: the shoeshine and the cervicalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the shoeshine happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the monotheisticness does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the anthropolatry but not the literalness occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the suggesting brandy occurs.; sent4 & sent8 -> int9: the impeding pulpwood happens and the discrimination happens.; int9 -> int10: the impeding pulpwood happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__