there is something such that if it is not Leonardesque that it is both not a malversation and not respectful does not hold.
sent1: that something is not a kind of a malversation and is not respectful is not correct if it is not Leonardesque. sent2: there is something such that if it is not laryngeal that it does not lob greaves and it does not manipulate is false. sent3: if the greaves is Leonardesque the fact that it is not a kind of a malversation and it is not respectful does not hold. sent4: there is something such that if it does not lob Acanthopterygii then it does not endorse and it is not aesculapian. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a anticholinergic it is both not premenstrual and non-brachial. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not Leonardesque then the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a malversation and is not respectful is correct is not true. sent7: the fact that something is both not a malversation and not respectful is not correct if it is Leonardesque. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a ambulacrum is true then it is non-leeward and it is not a kind of a Invar. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not Leonardesque then the fact that it is both not a malversation and respectful is wrong. sent10: the fact that the dining-room does not edge botfly and it does not throng is not right if it is not a program. sent11: the greaves is not a malversation and is not respectful if it is not Leonardesque. sent12: if the greaves is not Leonardesque then that it is not a malversation and is respectful is not correct. sent13: that something is both not a dust and not a prawn is wrong if it is not a Scythian. sent14: there exists something such that if it is Leonardesque then that it is not a malversation and it is not respectful is incorrect. sent15: that something does not digitize Vonnegut and does not digitize subscription is false if it is not a kind of a prawn. sent16: the fact that something is a malversation and is not respectful does not hold if it is not Leonardesque. sent17: that the grivet does not digitize rhinion and is disrespectful does not hold if it is not a kind of a slouch. sent18: the fact that the greaves is a malversation and not respectful is not correct if it is not Leonardesque. sent19: if something is not Leonardesque it is not a malversation and is not respectful. sent20: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not vaticinate hold it does not digitize grivet and is not a kind of a stump hold.
sent1 -> int1: if the greaves is not Leonardesque that it is not a malversation and it is not respectful is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not Leonardesque that it is both not a malversation and not respectful does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a kind of a malversation and is not respectful is not correct if it is not Leonardesque. sent2: there is something such that if it is not laryngeal that it does not lob greaves and it does not manipulate is false. sent3: if the greaves is Leonardesque the fact that it is not a kind of a malversation and it is not respectful does not hold. sent4: there is something such that if it does not lob Acanthopterygii then it does not endorse and it is not aesculapian. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a anticholinergic it is both not premenstrual and non-brachial. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not Leonardesque then the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a malversation and is not respectful is correct is not true. sent7: the fact that something is both not a malversation and not respectful is not correct if it is Leonardesque. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a ambulacrum is true then it is non-leeward and it is not a kind of a Invar. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not Leonardesque then the fact that it is both not a malversation and respectful is wrong. sent10: the fact that the dining-room does not edge botfly and it does not throng is not right if it is not a program. sent11: the greaves is not a malversation and is not respectful if it is not Leonardesque. sent12: if the greaves is not Leonardesque then that it is not a malversation and is respectful is not correct. sent13: that something is both not a dust and not a prawn is wrong if it is not a Scythian. sent14: there exists something such that if it is Leonardesque then that it is not a malversation and it is not respectful is incorrect. sent15: that something does not digitize Vonnegut and does not digitize subscription is false if it is not a kind of a prawn. sent16: the fact that something is a malversation and is not respectful does not hold if it is not Leonardesque. sent17: that the grivet does not digitize rhinion and is disrespectful does not hold if it is not a kind of a slouch. sent18: the fact that the greaves is a malversation and not respectful is not correct if it is not Leonardesque. sent19: if something is not Leonardesque it is not a malversation and is not respectful. sent20: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not vaticinate hold it does not digitize grivet and is not a kind of a stump hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the greaves is not Leonardesque that it is not a malversation and it is not respectful is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__