the grandee is unstatesmanlike and does not insulate.
sent1: the winceyette is not unstatesmanlike if there exists something such that it is life-support. sent2: the winceyette is not a mosque. sent3: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a explicitness that is not life-support is not correct then the winceyette is not unstatesmanlike. sent4: the coalfield is not a Ezekiel. sent5: if the coalfield is not a Ezekiel that the yardgrass is not hieroglyphic is not incorrect. sent6: the yardgrass is not a mosque and it is not hieroglyphic if the coalfield is not a kind of a Ezekiel. sent7: that that the burning is a explicitness but it is not life-support does not hold hold if the mesomorph is a megasporophyll. sent8: the grandee does not insulate if the fact that the winceyette is not unstatesmanlike is true. sent9: there exists something such that it is a explicitness but not life-support. sent10: the mesomorph is a kind of a megasporophyll if the rush does not recover. sent11: that the rush does not recover is true if the fact that the yardgrass is not a mosque but it is hieroglyphic is not wrong. sent12: that the grandee does not insulate is right. sent13: if that the mesomorph is a kind of a megasporophyll hold then the fact that the burning is a explicitness and is life-support does not hold. sent14: the rush does not recover if the yardgrass is not a mosque and not hieroglyphic. sent15: if something is a Ezekiel that it is unstatesmanlike and does not insulate does not hold. sent16: that the burning is a explicitness and it is life-support is not correct. sent17: the yardgrass is not a mosque and it does not recover if the rush is not a megasporophyll.
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the yardgrass is not a mosque and not hieroglyphic.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the rush does not recover.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the mesomorph is a kind of a megasporophyll.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the burning is a explicitness but it is not life-support is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is a explicitness and it is not life-support is not right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the winceyette is not unstatesmanlike.;
that the grandee is a kind of unstatesmanlike thing that does not insulate is false.
sent15 -> int7: the fact that the coalfield is unstatesmanlike and does not insulate is incorrect if it is a kind of a Ezekiel.;
$hypothesis$ = the grandee is unstatesmanlike and does not insulate. ; $context$ = sent1: the winceyette is not unstatesmanlike if there exists something such that it is life-support. sent2: the winceyette is not a mosque. sent3: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a explicitness that is not life-support is not correct then the winceyette is not unstatesmanlike. sent4: the coalfield is not a Ezekiel. sent5: if the coalfield is not a Ezekiel that the yardgrass is not hieroglyphic is not incorrect. sent6: the yardgrass is not a mosque and it is not hieroglyphic if the coalfield is not a kind of a Ezekiel. sent7: that that the burning is a explicitness but it is not life-support does not hold hold if the mesomorph is a megasporophyll. sent8: the grandee does not insulate if the fact that the winceyette is not unstatesmanlike is true. sent9: there exists something such that it is a explicitness but not life-support. sent10: the mesomorph is a kind of a megasporophyll if the rush does not recover. sent11: that the rush does not recover is true if the fact that the yardgrass is not a mosque but it is hieroglyphic is not wrong. sent12: that the grandee does not insulate is right. sent13: if that the mesomorph is a kind of a megasporophyll hold then the fact that the burning is a explicitness and is life-support does not hold. sent14: the rush does not recover if the yardgrass is not a mosque and not hieroglyphic. sent15: if something is a Ezekiel that it is unstatesmanlike and does not insulate does not hold. sent16: that the burning is a explicitness and it is life-support is not correct. sent17: the yardgrass is not a mosque and it does not recover if the rush is not a megasporophyll. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the yardgrass is not a mosque and not hieroglyphic.; sent14 & int1 -> int2: the rush does not recover.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the mesomorph is a kind of a megasporophyll.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the burning is a explicitness but it is not life-support is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is a explicitness and it is not life-support is not right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the winceyette is not unstatesmanlike.; __UNKNOWN__