the benedictine is not achromatic and/or it is not insoluble.
sent1: the benedictine is a bad. sent2: the fact that the benedictine is achromatic is not wrong if the desk is insoluble. sent3: the desk is a kind of a bad. sent4: the fact that either the benedictine is not insoluble or it is not a bad or both does not hold. sent5: the helianthemum coheres dimness. sent6: if the desk is achromatic then the fact that the benedictine is not achromatic or it is not insoluble or both is not correct. sent7: that the propylthiouracil is not a bad and/or it is not a Pomoxis is false. sent8: the desk is achromatic if the cardamom does cohere dimness. sent9: the cardamom does cohere dimness and it is a kind of a bad.
sent9 -> int1: the cardamom coheres dimness.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the desk is not non-achromatic.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the benedictine is not achromatic and/or it is not insoluble. ; $context$ = sent1: the benedictine is a bad. sent2: the fact that the benedictine is achromatic is not wrong if the desk is insoluble. sent3: the desk is a kind of a bad. sent4: the fact that either the benedictine is not insoluble or it is not a bad or both does not hold. sent5: the helianthemum coheres dimness. sent6: if the desk is achromatic then the fact that the benedictine is not achromatic or it is not insoluble or both is not correct. sent7: that the propylthiouracil is not a bad and/or it is not a Pomoxis is false. sent8: the desk is achromatic if the cardamom does cohere dimness. sent9: the cardamom does cohere dimness and it is a kind of a bad. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the cardamom coheres dimness.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the desk is not non-achromatic.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__