the wiring Jarrell happens.
sent1: if that the bloodlessness but not the bridge happens is incorrect then the wiring Jarrell does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the peripateticness and the sheltering outboard occurs does not hold. sent3: that the non-normativeness and the cachecticness occurs is triggered by that the co-option does not occur. sent4: the distinguishing brawn does not occur if the apogamicness occurs. sent5: if the constricting does not occur then that the gastroscopy or the non-cryogenicness or both occurs is false. sent6: that the coarctation does not occur is caused by that not the distinguishing brevity but the demagoguery happens. sent7: the upsetting does not occur. sent8: if the bloodlessness does not occur the wiring Jarrell does not occur. sent9: if the clickety-clack does not occur then the adsorbableness does not occur but the substantive happens. sent10: the angioplasty does not occur but the thaneship occurs. sent11: the performing does not occur if the non-adsorbableness and the substantive occurs. sent12: if that the democratization and the Lebaneseness happens is not correct then the perishableness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the neuroendocrineness occurs or the perishableness does not occur or both is incorrect if the performing does not occur. sent14: if not the footfault but the endogenicness occurs the clickety-clack does not occur. sent15: if the salientness does not occur the fact that the democratization and the Lebaneseness occurs is incorrect. sent16: if the bloodlessness occurs and the bridge does not occur the fact that the salient does not occur is right. sent17: the fact that the distinguishing robin occurs and/or the sheltering Thorndike does not occur does not hold if the Arawakanness does not occur. sent18: the footfault does not occur and the endogenicness occurs. sent19: that the civilness occurs and/or the cockfight does not occur is not correct if the fog does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bloodlessness happens but the bridge does not occur.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the salient does not occur.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the democratization occurs and the Lebanese happens does not hold.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the perishable does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the neuroendocrineness or the imperishableness or both occurs.; sent14 & sent18 -> int5: the clickety-clack does not occur.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: not the adsorbableness but the substantive occurs.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the performing does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: that the neuroendocrineness or the imperishableness or both occurs does not hold.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the bloodlessness happens but the bridge does not occur is incorrect.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the wiring Jarrell happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the bloodlessness but not the bridge happens is incorrect then the wiring Jarrell does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the peripateticness and the sheltering outboard occurs does not hold. sent3: that the non-normativeness and the cachecticness occurs is triggered by that the co-option does not occur. sent4: the distinguishing brawn does not occur if the apogamicness occurs. sent5: if the constricting does not occur then that the gastroscopy or the non-cryogenicness or both occurs is false. sent6: that the coarctation does not occur is caused by that not the distinguishing brevity but the demagoguery happens. sent7: the upsetting does not occur. sent8: if the bloodlessness does not occur the wiring Jarrell does not occur. sent9: if the clickety-clack does not occur then the adsorbableness does not occur but the substantive happens. sent10: the angioplasty does not occur but the thaneship occurs. sent11: the performing does not occur if the non-adsorbableness and the substantive occurs. sent12: if that the democratization and the Lebaneseness happens is not correct then the perishableness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the neuroendocrineness occurs or the perishableness does not occur or both is incorrect if the performing does not occur. sent14: if not the footfault but the endogenicness occurs the clickety-clack does not occur. sent15: if the salientness does not occur the fact that the democratization and the Lebaneseness occurs is incorrect. sent16: if the bloodlessness occurs and the bridge does not occur the fact that the salient does not occur is right. sent17: the fact that the distinguishing robin occurs and/or the sheltering Thorndike does not occur does not hold if the Arawakanness does not occur. sent18: the footfault does not occur and the endogenicness occurs. sent19: that the civilness occurs and/or the cockfight does not occur is not correct if the fog does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bloodlessness happens but the bridge does not occur.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the salient does not occur.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the fact that the democratization occurs and the Lebanese happens does not hold.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the perishable does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the neuroendocrineness or the imperishableness or both occurs.; sent14 & sent18 -> int5: the clickety-clack does not occur.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: not the adsorbableness but the substantive occurs.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the performing does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: that the neuroendocrineness or the imperishableness or both occurs does not hold.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the fact that the bloodlessness happens but the bridge does not occur is incorrect.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__