the fact that not the obfuscation but the proliferating radiotelegraph happens is incorrect.
sent1: the separationism yields the amalgamation. sent2: the mile occurs. sent3: that the Frenching discussant does not occur results in that the proliferating backstop does not occur. sent4: that the botryoidness occurs is prevented by that the Frenching warner occurs. sent5: either the deadness or the artillery or both happens. sent6: the fact that the obfuscation happens and the proliferating radiotelegraph happens is false if the Frenching bloodiness does not occur. sent7: if the proliferating 401-k does not occur the howling does not occur. sent8: the fact that the obfuscation does not occur and the proliferating radiotelegraph happens does not hold if the Frenching bloodiness does not occur. sent9: that the obfuscation does not occur is not wrong if that the obfuscation and the separationism happens is wrong. sent10: the botryoidness does not occur if the amalgamation and/or the Frenching warner occurs. sent11: that the snicking Black does not occur is brought about by that the separationism does not occur. sent12: the win does not occur. sent13: that the obfuscation occurs and the proliferating radiotelegraph happens does not hold. sent14: the plotting twenty-one does not occur. sent15: that the Frenching bloodiness happens is prevented by that the snicking Black does not occur. sent16: the pyroligneousness does not occur. sent17: the botryoidness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the separationism happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the amalgamation occurs.; int1 -> int2: the amalgamation happens and/or the Frenching warner happens.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the botryoidness does not occur.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the separationism does not occur is right.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the snicking Black does not occur.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the Frenching bloodiness does not occur.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the obfuscation does not occur but the proliferating radiotelegraph happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the obfuscation but the proliferating radiotelegraph happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the separationism yields the amalgamation. sent2: the mile occurs. sent3: that the Frenching discussant does not occur results in that the proliferating backstop does not occur. sent4: that the botryoidness occurs is prevented by that the Frenching warner occurs. sent5: either the deadness or the artillery or both happens. sent6: the fact that the obfuscation happens and the proliferating radiotelegraph happens is false if the Frenching bloodiness does not occur. sent7: if the proliferating 401-k does not occur the howling does not occur. sent8: the fact that the obfuscation does not occur and the proliferating radiotelegraph happens does not hold if the Frenching bloodiness does not occur. sent9: that the obfuscation does not occur is not wrong if that the obfuscation and the separationism happens is wrong. sent10: the botryoidness does not occur if the amalgamation and/or the Frenching warner occurs. sent11: that the snicking Black does not occur is brought about by that the separationism does not occur. sent12: the win does not occur. sent13: that the obfuscation occurs and the proliferating radiotelegraph happens does not hold. sent14: the plotting twenty-one does not occur. sent15: that the Frenching bloodiness happens is prevented by that the snicking Black does not occur. sent16: the pyroligneousness does not occur. sent17: the botryoidness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the separationism happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the amalgamation occurs.; int1 -> int2: the amalgamation happens and/or the Frenching warner happens.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the botryoidness does not occur.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the separationism does not occur is right.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the snicking Black does not occur.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the Frenching bloodiness does not occur.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__