the obstructionist is not comatose but it is generative.
sent1: the camisole spotlights. sent2: if the camisole is not a gaskin then the fact that the hobbler is a kind of oligarchic thing that is not a gaskin is not true. sent3: the fact that the lover does not clap is correct if the camisole is both a gaskin and a spotlight. sent4: the camisole is not comatose. sent5: the fact that the dispenser is comatose but it is not a gaskin does not hold if the camisole is not a gaskin. sent6: if that the camisole is non-oligarchic and it does not supple recombination is wrong then it is comatose. sent7: that the obstructionist is not generative but it does clap is not true. sent8: if something is not a kind of a gaskin the fact that it does not swim logic and it pairs sorority is incorrect. sent9: that the camisole is a spotlight and it is generative is not correct. sent10: if the dispenser is comatose then the fact that the obstructionist is comatose but it is generative is not right. sent11: if that the hobbler is oligarchic but it is not a gaskin is not right the dispenser is not non-comatose. sent12: the lover is not comatose. sent13: the fact that something does not clap and it does not spotlight is not true if it is comatose. sent14: the lover does clap and does supple recombination.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the camisole is a gaskin.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: the camisole is a gaskin and it is a kind of a spotlight.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the lover does not clap.; sent14 -> int3: the lover does clap.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the camisole is not a kind of a gaskin.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the hobbler is oligarchic thing that is not a kind of a gaskin is false.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the dispenser is comatose.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the maltha does not swim logic but it does pair sorority is wrong.
sent8 -> int8: if the maltha is not a gaskin then the fact that it does not swim logic and pairs sorority is not true.; sent13 -> int9: the fact that the camisole does not clap and is not a spotlight is not correct if it is comatose.;
$hypothesis$ = the obstructionist is not comatose but it is generative. ; $context$ = sent1: the camisole spotlights. sent2: if the camisole is not a gaskin then the fact that the hobbler is a kind of oligarchic thing that is not a gaskin is not true. sent3: the fact that the lover does not clap is correct if the camisole is both a gaskin and a spotlight. sent4: the camisole is not comatose. sent5: the fact that the dispenser is comatose but it is not a gaskin does not hold if the camisole is not a gaskin. sent6: if that the camisole is non-oligarchic and it does not supple recombination is wrong then it is comatose. sent7: that the obstructionist is not generative but it does clap is not true. sent8: if something is not a kind of a gaskin the fact that it does not swim logic and it pairs sorority is incorrect. sent9: that the camisole is a spotlight and it is generative is not correct. sent10: if the dispenser is comatose then the fact that the obstructionist is comatose but it is generative is not right. sent11: if that the hobbler is oligarchic but it is not a gaskin is not right the dispenser is not non-comatose. sent12: the lover is not comatose. sent13: the fact that something does not clap and it does not spotlight is not true if it is comatose. sent14: the lover does clap and does supple recombination. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the camisole is a gaskin.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: the camisole is a gaskin and it is a kind of a spotlight.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the lover does not clap.; sent14 -> int3: the lover does clap.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the camisole is not a kind of a gaskin.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the hobbler is oligarchic thing that is not a kind of a gaskin is false.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the dispenser is comatose.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__