the carbocyclicness but not the impatientness happens if the slugging skyrocket occurs.
sent1: that the slugging pole does not occur results in that the irresistibleness but not the diffraction happens. sent2: if the felineness and the impatientness happens the slugging skyrocket does not occur. sent3: the slugging pole occurs and the felineness occurs. sent4: the fertilization does not occur.
sent3 -> int1: the feline happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the impatientness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the feline and the impatientness happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the slugging skyrocket does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slugging skyrocket occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the impatientness does not occur.;
that the irresistibleness but not the diffraction occurs is not false.
$hypothesis$ = the carbocyclicness but not the impatientness happens if the slugging skyrocket occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the slugging pole does not occur results in that the irresistibleness but not the diffraction happens. sent2: if the felineness and the impatientness happens the slugging skyrocket does not occur. sent3: the slugging pole occurs and the felineness occurs. sent4: the fertilization does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the feline happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the impatientness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the feline and the impatientness happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the slugging skyrocket does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slugging skyrocket occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the impatientness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__