there exists something such that if that it is cismontane and it is not a kind of a petrissage is not true it does leap Munchener.
sent1: the bottle-tree is not a Desmodontidae if the fact that the antimetabolite is a Desmodontidae and does liberate is false. sent2: the fact that something leaps Munchener but it is not a pisser does not hold if the fact that it is incongruent hold. sent3: if something is a pisser then it leaps Munchener. sent4: if the yeast does leap Munchener and is not a ruggedization then it does dangle pretension. sent5: that the ACTH is a kind of a nomogram that is non-Gauguinesque is wrong. sent6: something is incongruent if the fact that it does not leap antimetabolite and is not incongruent is not right. sent7: the fact that something is a blandishment and it is astomatal is not right if it is not a Desmodontidae. sent8: that the antimetabolite is a Desmodontidae that liberates is false. sent9: if that the ACTH is a kind of cismontane a petrissage is false it does leap Munchener. sent10: if that something is cismontane but it is not a petrissage does not hold then it is a pisser. sent11: something is not anaerobic if that it is a blandishment and it is astomatal is not true. sent12: that the ACTH is not a Mexican hold. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it does leap Munchener and is not a pisser is wrong the luffa is a kind of a petrissage. sent14: if something is not anaerobic that it does not leap antimetabolite and is not incongruent does not hold. sent15: if that the ACTH guggles Wisconsin but it is not a petrissage does not hold then it is a Gide.
sent10 -> int1: if that the ACTH is cismontane but it is not a petrissage is not right then it is a pisser.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ACTH is cismontane but it is not a petrissage does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ACTH is a kind of a pisser.; sent3 -> int3: the ACTH leaps Munchener if it is a kind of a pisser.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the ACTH leaps Munchener is not false.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the ACTH leaps Munchener if that it is cismontane and it is not a kind of a petrissage does not hold.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the luffa is a petrissage.
sent2 -> int6: that the bottle-tree does leap Munchener but it is not a kind of a pisser does not hold if it is incongruent.; sent6 -> int7: the bottle-tree is incongruent if that it does not leap antimetabolite and it is not incongruent does not hold.; sent14 -> int8: if the bottle-tree is not anaerobic then the fact that it does not leap antimetabolite and it is congruent does not hold.; sent11 -> int9: if the fact that the bottle-tree is a blandishment and is astomatal is wrong then it is not anaerobic.; sent7 -> int10: if the bottle-tree is not a Desmodontidae then that it is a blandishment and it is astomatal does not hold.; sent1 & sent8 -> int11: the bottle-tree is not a kind of a Desmodontidae.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the fact that the bottle-tree is a blandishment and it is astomatal hold does not hold.; int9 & int12 -> int13: the bottle-tree is not anaerobic.; int8 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the bottle-tree does not leap antimetabolite and it is not incongruent is wrong.; int7 & int14 -> int15: the bottle-tree is incongruent.; int6 & int15 -> int16: that the bottle-tree leaps Munchener and is not a pisser is not true.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that the fact that it leaps Munchener and it is not a pisser is incorrect.; int17 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is cismontane and it is not a kind of a petrissage is not true it does leap Munchener. ; $context$ = sent1: the bottle-tree is not a Desmodontidae if the fact that the antimetabolite is a Desmodontidae and does liberate is false. sent2: the fact that something leaps Munchener but it is not a pisser does not hold if the fact that it is incongruent hold. sent3: if something is a pisser then it leaps Munchener. sent4: if the yeast does leap Munchener and is not a ruggedization then it does dangle pretension. sent5: that the ACTH is a kind of a nomogram that is non-Gauguinesque is wrong. sent6: something is incongruent if the fact that it does not leap antimetabolite and is not incongruent is not right. sent7: the fact that something is a blandishment and it is astomatal is not right if it is not a Desmodontidae. sent8: that the antimetabolite is a Desmodontidae that liberates is false. sent9: if that the ACTH is a kind of cismontane a petrissage is false it does leap Munchener. sent10: if that something is cismontane but it is not a petrissage does not hold then it is a pisser. sent11: something is not anaerobic if that it is a blandishment and it is astomatal is not true. sent12: that the ACTH is not a Mexican hold. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it does leap Munchener and is not a pisser is wrong the luffa is a kind of a petrissage. sent14: if something is not anaerobic that it does not leap antimetabolite and is not incongruent does not hold. sent15: if that the ACTH guggles Wisconsin but it is not a petrissage does not hold then it is a Gide. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if that the ACTH is cismontane but it is not a petrissage is not right then it is a pisser.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ACTH is cismontane but it is not a petrissage does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ACTH is a kind of a pisser.; sent3 -> int3: the ACTH leaps Munchener if it is a kind of a pisser.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the ACTH leaps Munchener is not false.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the ACTH leaps Munchener if that it is cismontane and it is not a kind of a petrissage does not hold.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__