the fact that there exists something such that if it is a sensation the fact that it is not an onslaught or it is not a kind of a yang or both is not right is not correct.
sent1: if the concentrate is a sensation then it is a yang. sent2: there is something such that if it reflectorizes scepter the fact that it is either not a Hickock or not Aberdonian or both does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it ascertains winnow it does panel. sent4: the boilerplate is mild or non-pneumatics or both if it is opposite. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sensation then it is not a kind of an onslaught and/or it is not a yang. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a sensation the fact that either it is not an onslaught or it is a yang or both does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is a sensation it is an onslaught. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a pendragon then the fact that it does not dice and/or is not untranslatable does not hold. sent9: that the concentrate is a Hickock and/or it is not a sensation is not right if it does ascertain gobbler. sent10: if the clypeus is a kind of a Argyrol then it is not an ownership or is not unexpansive or both. sent11: that either something is not a prohibition or it is not a polyhedron or both is not right if it is basiscopic. sent12: if the concentrate is a kind of a sensation that it is not an onslaught and/or it is not a yang does not hold. sent13: if the concentrate does gesticulate then it is not a yang and/or it does not reflectorize Amia. sent14: there is something such that if it does pigment week then the fact that either it is not a Langley or it is not betulaceous or both is false. sent15: if the Wesleyan ascertains gobbler then that it is a kind of a Beatitude and/or is not a kind of a yang is not true.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not non-basiscopic then the fact that it is not a kind of a prohibition or is not a polyhedron or both is wrong.
sent11 -> int1: if the almsgiver is basiscopic then the fact that it either is not a prohibition or is not a polyhedron or both is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a sensation the fact that it is not an onslaught or it is not a kind of a yang or both is not right is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the concentrate is a sensation then it is a yang. sent2: there is something such that if it reflectorizes scepter the fact that it is either not a Hickock or not Aberdonian or both does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it ascertains winnow it does panel. sent4: the boilerplate is mild or non-pneumatics or both if it is opposite. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sensation then it is not a kind of an onslaught and/or it is not a yang. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a sensation the fact that either it is not an onslaught or it is a yang or both does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is a sensation it is an onslaught. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a pendragon then the fact that it does not dice and/or is not untranslatable does not hold. sent9: that the concentrate is a Hickock and/or it is not a sensation is not right if it does ascertain gobbler. sent10: if the clypeus is a kind of a Argyrol then it is not an ownership or is not unexpansive or both. sent11: that either something is not a prohibition or it is not a polyhedron or both is not right if it is basiscopic. sent12: if the concentrate is a kind of a sensation that it is not an onslaught and/or it is not a yang does not hold. sent13: if the concentrate does gesticulate then it is not a yang and/or it does not reflectorize Amia. sent14: there is something such that if it does pigment week then the fact that either it is not a Langley or it is not betulaceous or both is false. sent15: if the Wesleyan ascertains gobbler then that it is a kind of a Beatitude and/or is not a kind of a yang is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__