that the thatcher is not chemoreceptive is right if that the nucleon does not turn harmfulness but it is a Cacicus does not hold.
sent1: the thatcher is non-chemoreceptive if the nucleon does not turn harmfulness and is a kind of a Cacicus. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does not turn harmfulness and it is a kind of a Cacicus is incorrect the thatcher is chemoreceptive. sent3: if something that does not turn harmfulness is a Cacicus then the thatcher is not chemoreceptive. sent4: there exists something such that that it is not a Cacicus but chemoreceptive is not right. sent5: the thatcher is not chemoreceptive if the nucleon is not a Cacicus. sent6: if there is something such that that it does not turn harmfulness and is a kind of a Cacicus does not hold then that the thatcher is not chemoreceptive is not false. sent7: the nucleon does not wear muskellunge if there are non-basophilic things. sent8: that the nucleon is both not a Cacicus and chemoreceptive is not correct. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not chemoreceptive and it is a kind of a Cacicus is wrong. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it does turn harmfulness and is a Cacicus does not hold the thatcher is not chemoreceptive.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nucleon does not turn harmfulness and is a kind of a Cacicus is false.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not turn harmfulness and is a kind of a Cacicus does not hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the thatcher is not chemoreceptive.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the thatcher is not chemoreceptive is right if that the nucleon does not turn harmfulness but it is a Cacicus does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the thatcher is non-chemoreceptive if the nucleon does not turn harmfulness and is a kind of a Cacicus. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does not turn harmfulness and it is a kind of a Cacicus is incorrect the thatcher is chemoreceptive. sent3: if something that does not turn harmfulness is a Cacicus then the thatcher is not chemoreceptive. sent4: there exists something such that that it is not a Cacicus but chemoreceptive is not right. sent5: the thatcher is not chemoreceptive if the nucleon is not a Cacicus. sent6: if there is something such that that it does not turn harmfulness and is a kind of a Cacicus does not hold then that the thatcher is not chemoreceptive is not false. sent7: the nucleon does not wear muskellunge if there are non-basophilic things. sent8: that the nucleon is both not a Cacicus and chemoreceptive is not correct. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not chemoreceptive and it is a kind of a Cacicus is wrong. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it does turn harmfulness and is a Cacicus does not hold the thatcher is not chemoreceptive. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nucleon does not turn harmfulness and is a kind of a Cacicus is false.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not turn harmfulness and is a kind of a Cacicus does not hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the thatcher is not chemoreceptive.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__