that the Navaho does not snort is right.
sent1: the Wilton is not an annex if the Navaho snorts and it is a kind of an agnostic. sent2: if something is a snowball then it does multiply nucleon. sent3: the linkboy does poultice frankness if the Wilton does multiply nucleon. sent4: the dideoxycytosine is not a book. sent5: the fact that something does not poultice frankness and is not prudent is not true if it is not a book. sent6: the Navaho is agnostic if the fact that the eaglet is not a kind of a Panipat or it does patronage ohmmeter or both is wrong. sent7: the linkboy does not poultice frankness if that the dideoxycytosine does not poultice frankness and it is not prudent is wrong. sent8: if that something is an agnostic but it does not snort is wrong then it snort. sent9: the fact that that the eaglet either is not a Panipat or patronages ohmmeter or both is not right is not incorrect. sent10: something that is not an annex is a snowball.
sent6 & sent9 -> int1: the Navaho is a kind of an agnostic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Navaho snorts.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Navaho does snort and is agnostic.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Wilton is not a kind of an annex.; sent10 -> int4: if the Wilton is not an annex then it does snowball.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Wilton snowballs.; sent2 -> int6: the Wilton multiplies nucleon if it is a snowball.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Wilton multiplies nucleon.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the linkboy does poultice frankness.; sent5 -> int9: if the fact that the dideoxycytosine does not book is right the fact that it does not poultice frankness and is not prudent is not right.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: that that the dideoxycytosine does not poultice frankness and is not prudent is right is not correct.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the linkboy does not poultice frankness.; int8 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the Navaho does snort.
sent8 -> int13: if that the Navaho is agnostic but it does not snort does not hold then it does snort.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Navaho does not snort is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the Wilton is not an annex if the Navaho snorts and it is a kind of an agnostic. sent2: if something is a snowball then it does multiply nucleon. sent3: the linkboy does poultice frankness if the Wilton does multiply nucleon. sent4: the dideoxycytosine is not a book. sent5: the fact that something does not poultice frankness and is not prudent is not true if it is not a book. sent6: the Navaho is agnostic if the fact that the eaglet is not a kind of a Panipat or it does patronage ohmmeter or both is wrong. sent7: the linkboy does not poultice frankness if that the dideoxycytosine does not poultice frankness and it is not prudent is wrong. sent8: if that something is an agnostic but it does not snort is wrong then it snort. sent9: the fact that that the eaglet either is not a Panipat or patronages ohmmeter or both is not right is not incorrect. sent10: something that is not an annex is a snowball. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent9 -> int1: the Navaho is a kind of an agnostic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Navaho snorts.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Navaho does snort and is agnostic.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Wilton is not a kind of an annex.; sent10 -> int4: if the Wilton is not an annex then it does snowball.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Wilton snowballs.; sent2 -> int6: the Wilton multiplies nucleon if it is a snowball.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Wilton multiplies nucleon.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the linkboy does poultice frankness.; sent5 -> int9: if the fact that the dideoxycytosine does not book is right the fact that it does not poultice frankness and is not prudent is not right.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: that that the dideoxycytosine does not poultice frankness and is not prudent is right is not correct.; sent7 & int10 -> int11: the linkboy does not poultice frankness.; int8 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__