the fact that there is something such that if it does hum Vesey the fact that it does not keratinize acetylcholine and does not hum purgative does not hold is not correct.
sent1: that something does not enliven and it does not keratinize fauna is wrong if it hums Megalosauridae. sent2: if the sander hums Vesey then that it does not keratinize acetylcholine and it hums purgative is not correct. sent3: the fact that the sander does not keratinize acetylcholine and is not perinatal does not hold if it does keratinize Athelstan. sent4: the fact that the sander keratinizes acetylcholine and does not hum purgative is false if it hums Vesey. sent5: that the sander does not keratinize acetylcholine and it does not hum purgative does not hold if it does hum Vesey. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it hums Vesey is right the fact that it keratinizes acetylcholine and it does not hum purgative is not right. sent7: if something is a rectus the fact that it is not a encumbrance and does not keratinize Jewry is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a pocket-handkerchief then that the fact that it does not keratinize Jewry and it is non-chemiluminescent is not incorrect is not correct. sent9: that the dichroism is not a lake and is a untrustworthiness is not correct if the fact that it overtakes is true. sent10: that something does not disembark and it is not rotary is not correct if it does shush Cairo. sent11: if that the gametangium is a reversed hold that it is not unstuck and it hums Vesey does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a validation then the fact that it is not lighted and it does shush Cairo is not correct. sent13: there is something such that if it hums Vesey it does not keratinize acetylcholine and does not hum purgative. sent14: there exists something such that if it hums Vesey then that it does not keratinize acetylcholine and it hums purgative is incorrect. sent15: if the sander does shade then the fact that it is both brachial and not an encouragement is wrong. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a hack then that it is not happy and it is not a valentine is not right. sent17: if the sander does hum Vesey then it does not keratinize acetylcholine and it does not hum purgative.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it hums Megalosauridae then the fact that it does not enliven and it does not keratinize fauna is not correct.
sent1 -> int1: if the contralto does hum Megalosauridae then the fact that it does not enliven and it does not keratinize fauna does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does hum Vesey the fact that it does not keratinize acetylcholine and does not hum purgative does not hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does not enliven and it does not keratinize fauna is wrong if it hums Megalosauridae. sent2: if the sander hums Vesey then that it does not keratinize acetylcholine and it hums purgative is not correct. sent3: the fact that the sander does not keratinize acetylcholine and is not perinatal does not hold if it does keratinize Athelstan. sent4: the fact that the sander keratinizes acetylcholine and does not hum purgative is false if it hums Vesey. sent5: that the sander does not keratinize acetylcholine and it does not hum purgative does not hold if it does hum Vesey. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it hums Vesey is right the fact that it keratinizes acetylcholine and it does not hum purgative is not right. sent7: if something is a rectus the fact that it is not a encumbrance and does not keratinize Jewry is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a pocket-handkerchief then that the fact that it does not keratinize Jewry and it is non-chemiluminescent is not incorrect is not correct. sent9: that the dichroism is not a lake and is a untrustworthiness is not correct if the fact that it overtakes is true. sent10: that something does not disembark and it is not rotary is not correct if it does shush Cairo. sent11: if that the gametangium is a reversed hold that it is not unstuck and it hums Vesey does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a validation then the fact that it is not lighted and it does shush Cairo is not correct. sent13: there is something such that if it hums Vesey it does not keratinize acetylcholine and does not hum purgative. sent14: there exists something such that if it hums Vesey then that it does not keratinize acetylcholine and it hums purgative is incorrect. sent15: if the sander does shade then the fact that it is both brachial and not an encouragement is wrong. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a hack then that it is not happy and it is not a valentine is not right. sent17: if the sander does hum Vesey then it does not keratinize acetylcholine and it does not hum purgative. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__