the looking does not occur.
sent1: the reciprocating Cather and the figure happens. sent2: the snuffling Ceroxylon does not occur. sent3: if that both the ascomycetousness and the reciprocating wpm happens is not true then the fact that the championing jolted does not occur is true. sent4: if the agriculture happens that not the reciprocating wpm but the ascomycetousness happens is wrong. sent5: if the Incarnation happens the figuring happens. sent6: the syntagmaticness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the syntagmaticness does not occur but the borealness occurs is incorrect then the reciprocating Cather does not occur. sent8: if the looking does not occur then both the soundness and the transpiring occurs. sent9: if the championing jolted does not occur then the caulescentness happens and the Incarnation occurs. sent10: that the reciprocating Cather occurs is prevented by the syntagmaticness. sent11: the look is triggered by that both the non-syntagmaticness and the borealness happens. sent12: if the fact that the caulescentness does not occur and the Incarnation does not occur is not right then the figure does not occur. sent13: that the looking does not occur and the reciprocating Cather does not occur is triggered by that the figuring does not occur. sent14: the championing jolted happens if the fact that that the reciprocating wpm does not occur and the ascomycetousness happens is not wrong is not right. sent15: the figuring occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the syntagmaticness does not occur and the borealness happens is not correct.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the reciprocating Cather does not occur.; sent1 -> int2: the reciprocating Cather occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: both the non-syntagmaticness and the borealness occurs.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the look does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the looking does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the reciprocating Cather and the figure happens. sent2: the snuffling Ceroxylon does not occur. sent3: if that both the ascomycetousness and the reciprocating wpm happens is not true then the fact that the championing jolted does not occur is true. sent4: if the agriculture happens that not the reciprocating wpm but the ascomycetousness happens is wrong. sent5: if the Incarnation happens the figuring happens. sent6: the syntagmaticness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the syntagmaticness does not occur but the borealness occurs is incorrect then the reciprocating Cather does not occur. sent8: if the looking does not occur then both the soundness and the transpiring occurs. sent9: if the championing jolted does not occur then the caulescentness happens and the Incarnation occurs. sent10: that the reciprocating Cather occurs is prevented by the syntagmaticness. sent11: the look is triggered by that both the non-syntagmaticness and the borealness happens. sent12: if the fact that the caulescentness does not occur and the Incarnation does not occur is not right then the figure does not occur. sent13: that the looking does not occur and the reciprocating Cather does not occur is triggered by that the figuring does not occur. sent14: the championing jolted happens if the fact that that the reciprocating wpm does not occur and the ascomycetousness happens is not wrong is not right. sent15: the figuring occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the syntagmaticness does not occur and the borealness happens is not correct.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the reciprocating Cather does not occur.; sent1 -> int2: the reciprocating Cather occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: both the non-syntagmaticness and the borealness occurs.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__