if the worthy is a destructibility the axolotl does bop Akan.
sent1: if the Peter unpicks the fact that the vane is a roller is right. sent2: the Peter does not intimate if the vane unpicks. sent3: the worthy does unpick. sent4: if the worthy is a destructibility the fact that the vane unpicks and is a roller is wrong. sent5: the fact that the Peter is a roller is not incorrect. sent6: the axolotl is a roller. sent7: if that the Peter does not intimate hold then the axolotl does bop Akan. sent8: if the worthy does not unpick then the vane is a kind of a destructibility. sent9: the axolotl does unpick. sent10: if the worthy is a kind of a destructibility the fact that the vane does not unpick and is a roller is not correct. sent11: the vane does intimate if the Peter does unpick. sent12: the fact that the axolotl does not bop Akan but it does intimate does not hold. sent13: if the worthy unpicks that the vane is not a destructibility and is a roller is wrong. sent14: the worthy does not bop Akan. sent15: the worthy is a roller. sent16: that the vane does unpick and is a roller does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the worthy is a destructibility.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the vane does not unpick and is a kind of a roller is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = if the worthy is a destructibility the axolotl does bop Akan. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Peter unpicks the fact that the vane is a roller is right. sent2: the Peter does not intimate if the vane unpicks. sent3: the worthy does unpick. sent4: if the worthy is a destructibility the fact that the vane unpicks and is a roller is wrong. sent5: the fact that the Peter is a roller is not incorrect. sent6: the axolotl is a roller. sent7: if that the Peter does not intimate hold then the axolotl does bop Akan. sent8: if the worthy does not unpick then the vane is a kind of a destructibility. sent9: the axolotl does unpick. sent10: if the worthy is a kind of a destructibility the fact that the vane does not unpick and is a roller is not correct. sent11: the vane does intimate if the Peter does unpick. sent12: the fact that the axolotl does not bop Akan but it does intimate does not hold. sent13: if the worthy unpicks that the vane is not a destructibility and is a roller is wrong. sent14: the worthy does not bop Akan. sent15: the worthy is a roller. sent16: that the vane does unpick and is a roller does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the worthy is a destructibility.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the vane does not unpick and is a kind of a roller is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__