there exists something such that it does not idealize waterfall and it is not anaclitic.
sent1: that the mustachio is not a kind of a handedness if the fact that the vociferator is not a valved and does not subside Cimabue is incorrect is true. sent2: something does guard Hutton. sent3: the mustachio does not inflame if that the napu is a kind of a handedness is right. sent4: if that the courbaril is a handedness and/or subsides Cimabue is incorrect then the vociferator does not idealize waterfall. sent5: the mustachio is not a Stoppard. sent6: if the mustachio is not a handedness the napu is not a handedness. sent7: the napu does not idealize waterfall. sent8: if that the fact that the napu either does inflame or is a kind of a handedness or both does not hold is true the courbaril does not idealize waterfall. sent9: something does not idealize waterfall. sent10: there is something such that it is not a valved. sent11: the vociferator does not inflame if the napu is not a valved. sent12: the napu is not a kind of a handedness. sent13: if the mustachio is not a handedness that either the napu inflames or it is a handedness or both is incorrect. sent14: the mustachio does not guard Hutton. sent15: the fact that the mustachio is both not a handedness and not anaclitic is not true. sent16: if that there exists something such that it guards Hutton hold the fact that the vociferator is not a kind of a valved and does not subside Cimabue does not hold. sent17: the mustachio is not anaclitic if that the courbaril does not subside Cimabue and is not a handedness is not right. sent18: the courbaril is not anaclitic. sent19: the mustachio does not inflame. sent20: that either the vociferator is a handedness or it subsides Cimabue or both is false. sent21: there exists something such that that it is not anaclitic is not false. sent22: the fact that the mustachio is not a kind of a handedness and does subside Cimabue does not hold. sent23: there is something such that it is not a kind of a paralytic. sent24: something is not a kind of a handedness if the fact that it is a valved and it is a kind of a handedness does not hold.
sent2 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the vociferator is not a kind of a valved and it does not subside Cimabue is not true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the mustachio is not a handedness.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the fact that the napu does inflame and/or it is a handedness does not hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the courbaril does not idealize waterfall.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the courbaril does not idealize waterfall and it is not anaclitic.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the allotrope is not a handedness.
sent24 -> int6: the allotrope is not a kind of a handedness if the fact that it is a valved and is a handedness is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does not idealize waterfall and it is not anaclitic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mustachio is not a kind of a handedness if the fact that the vociferator is not a valved and does not subside Cimabue is incorrect is true. sent2: something does guard Hutton. sent3: the mustachio does not inflame if that the napu is a kind of a handedness is right. sent4: if that the courbaril is a handedness and/or subsides Cimabue is incorrect then the vociferator does not idealize waterfall. sent5: the mustachio is not a Stoppard. sent6: if the mustachio is not a handedness the napu is not a handedness. sent7: the napu does not idealize waterfall. sent8: if that the fact that the napu either does inflame or is a kind of a handedness or both does not hold is true the courbaril does not idealize waterfall. sent9: something does not idealize waterfall. sent10: there is something such that it is not a valved. sent11: the vociferator does not inflame if the napu is not a valved. sent12: the napu is not a kind of a handedness. sent13: if the mustachio is not a handedness that either the napu inflames or it is a handedness or both is incorrect. sent14: the mustachio does not guard Hutton. sent15: the fact that the mustachio is both not a handedness and not anaclitic is not true. sent16: if that there exists something such that it guards Hutton hold the fact that the vociferator is not a kind of a valved and does not subside Cimabue does not hold. sent17: the mustachio is not anaclitic if that the courbaril does not subside Cimabue and is not a handedness is not right. sent18: the courbaril is not anaclitic. sent19: the mustachio does not inflame. sent20: that either the vociferator is a handedness or it subsides Cimabue or both is false. sent21: there exists something such that that it is not anaclitic is not false. sent22: the fact that the mustachio is not a kind of a handedness and does subside Cimabue does not hold. sent23: there is something such that it is not a kind of a paralytic. sent24: something is not a kind of a handedness if the fact that it is a valved and it is a kind of a handedness does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent16 -> int1: the fact that the vociferator is not a kind of a valved and it does not subside Cimabue is not true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the mustachio is not a handedness.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the fact that the napu does inflame and/or it is a handedness does not hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the courbaril does not idealize waterfall.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the courbaril does not idealize waterfall and it is not anaclitic.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__