the aphanite is capitalistic.
sent1: The fact that the mouthpiece subsides aphanite is true. sent2: the fact that something does subside mouthpiece and/or is amblyopic is not right if it is non-filial. sent3: the copycat is not filial if there is something such that it does idealize Caspar. sent4: something is not capitalistic if it is amblyopic and it subsides mouthpiece. sent5: the aphanite is amblyopic. sent6: the preparation does not dwarf joinery. sent7: something does idealize Caspar and it is intramuscular if the fact that it does not dwarf joinery hold. sent8: the fact that the aphanite subsides mouthpiece is true.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the aphanite is amblyopic and it subsides mouthpiece.; sent4 -> int2: the aphanite is not capitalistic if it is amblyopic and it subsides mouthpiece.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the aphanite is capitalistic is right.
sent2 -> int3: if the copycat is not filial the fact that it does subside mouthpiece and/or it is amblyopic is wrong.; sent7 -> int4: if the preparation does not dwarf joinery then it idealizes Caspar and is intramuscular.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the preparation does idealize Caspar and it is intramuscular.; int5 -> int6: the preparation idealizes Caspar.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does idealize Caspar.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the copycat is not filial.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the copycat does subside mouthpiece and/or it is amblyopic does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it either subsides mouthpiece or is amblyopic or both is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the aphanite is capitalistic. ; $context$ = sent1: The fact that the mouthpiece subsides aphanite is true. sent2: the fact that something does subside mouthpiece and/or is amblyopic is not right if it is non-filial. sent3: the copycat is not filial if there is something such that it does idealize Caspar. sent4: something is not capitalistic if it is amblyopic and it subsides mouthpiece. sent5: the aphanite is amblyopic. sent6: the preparation does not dwarf joinery. sent7: something does idealize Caspar and it is intramuscular if the fact that it does not dwarf joinery hold. sent8: the fact that the aphanite subsides mouthpiece is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the aphanite is amblyopic and it subsides mouthpiece.; sent4 -> int2: the aphanite is not capitalistic if it is amblyopic and it subsides mouthpiece.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__