that if the nimbus does not occur then the fact that the booking veined occurs is not incorrect is not correct.
sent1: that not the nimbus but the booking veined happens prevents that the chylificness does not occur. sent2: that the cathecticness does not occur is prevented by that the booking Lego does not occur but the connoting happens. sent3: the non-chylificness and the pilarness happens. sent4: the fact that the chylificness occurs is true if the nimbus happens but the booking veined does not occur. sent5: the chylificness occurs if that the nimbus does not occur and the booking veined does not occur is not false. sent6: if the circumnavigating does not occur then both the non-usefulness and the chylificness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nimbus does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the booking veined does not occur.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the nimbus does not occur and the booking veined does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the chylificness occurs.; sent3 -> int3: that the chylificness does not occur is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the booking veined occurs.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the non-usefulness and the prohibition happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if the nimbus does not occur then the fact that the booking veined occurs is not incorrect is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the nimbus but the booking veined happens prevents that the chylificness does not occur. sent2: that the cathecticness does not occur is prevented by that the booking Lego does not occur but the connoting happens. sent3: the non-chylificness and the pilarness happens. sent4: the fact that the chylificness occurs is true if the nimbus happens but the booking veined does not occur. sent5: the chylificness occurs if that the nimbus does not occur and the booking veined does not occur is not false. sent6: if the circumnavigating does not occur then both the non-usefulness and the chylificness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nimbus does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the booking veined does not occur.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the nimbus does not occur and the booking veined does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the chylificness occurs.; sent3 -> int3: that the chylificness does not occur is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the booking veined occurs.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__