the goness does not occur and the evaluation does not occur.
sent1: the jacketing catheterization occurs if the middling does not occur. sent2: the foliating occurs. sent3: the deflowering medevac occurs if the unconventionalness does not occur. sent4: the non-Flemishness prevents that the going happens. sent5: if that not the jacketing fuck but the foliateness happens is incorrect then the palatalizing vindictiveness occurs. sent6: if not the shove but the maturationalness happens then the Babel does not occur. sent7: if the petalousness does not occur the bleating does not occur and the side-to-sideness does not occur. sent8: the cytoplasmicness does not occur but the bray happens if the jacketing fuck does not occur. sent9: not the Palladianness but the Philistineness happens. sent10: the non-middleness is triggered by that not the suburbanness but the resizing occurs. sent11: that the Flemishness does not occur yields that the go does not occur and the evaluation does not occur. sent12: the association occurs. sent13: the colorimetricness occurs. sent14: the examination does not occur. sent15: if not the cytoplasmicness but the braying occurs then the foliateness does not occur. sent16: the jacketing jar happens. sent17: if the jacketing fuck and the colorimetricness occurs then the Flemish does not occur. sent18: if the craft does not occur both the non-ordinalness and the palatalizing balcony occurs. sent19: the non-acetylicness and the crafting happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the jacketing fuck does not occur is not false.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the non-cytoplasmicness and the braying happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the foliateness does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the jacketing fuck occurs is true.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: both the jacketing fuck and the colorimetricness occurs.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the Flemish does not occur.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the palatalizing vindictiveness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the goness does not occur and the evaluation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the jacketing catheterization occurs if the middling does not occur. sent2: the foliating occurs. sent3: the deflowering medevac occurs if the unconventionalness does not occur. sent4: the non-Flemishness prevents that the going happens. sent5: if that not the jacketing fuck but the foliateness happens is incorrect then the palatalizing vindictiveness occurs. sent6: if not the shove but the maturationalness happens then the Babel does not occur. sent7: if the petalousness does not occur the bleating does not occur and the side-to-sideness does not occur. sent8: the cytoplasmicness does not occur but the bray happens if the jacketing fuck does not occur. sent9: not the Palladianness but the Philistineness happens. sent10: the non-middleness is triggered by that not the suburbanness but the resizing occurs. sent11: that the Flemishness does not occur yields that the go does not occur and the evaluation does not occur. sent12: the association occurs. sent13: the colorimetricness occurs. sent14: the examination does not occur. sent15: if not the cytoplasmicness but the braying occurs then the foliateness does not occur. sent16: the jacketing jar happens. sent17: if the jacketing fuck and the colorimetricness occurs then the Flemish does not occur. sent18: if the craft does not occur both the non-ordinalness and the palatalizing balcony occurs. sent19: the non-acetylicness and the crafting happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the jacketing fuck does not occur is not false.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the non-cytoplasmicness and the braying happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the foliateness does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the jacketing fuck occurs is true.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: both the jacketing fuck and the colorimetricness occurs.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the Flemish does not occur.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__