the fact that the tormenting subjunctive does not occur and the breakfast does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the bayoneting mystic does not occur if that the non-bulimicness or the inspissation or both happens is not true. sent2: the forcefulness does not occur. sent3: the pulling occurs and the weakening happens. sent4: that the breakfasting does not occur is brought about by that the implementation does not occur. sent5: if the pull happens then that the bulimicness does not occur and/or the inspissation occurs is not right. sent6: if the implementation does not occur the tormenting subjunctive does not occur and the breakfast does not occur. sent7: not the concussion but the prolixness occurs. sent8: if that the acceleration but not the atonicness occurs does not hold that the tormenting subjunctive does not occur is right. sent9: that the bayoneting mystic does not occur brings about that the stirring does not occur and the breakfast does not occur. sent10: the fact that the concussion and the prolixness occurs does not hold if the implementation happens. sent11: if the implementation occurs then the fact that the concussion does not occur but the prolixness occurs is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the implementation occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that not the concussion but the prolixness happens is not correct is correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the implementation does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tormenting subjunctive does not occur and the breakfasting does not occur is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tormenting subjunctive does not occur and the breakfast does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the bayoneting mystic does not occur if that the non-bulimicness or the inspissation or both happens is not true. sent2: the forcefulness does not occur. sent3: the pulling occurs and the weakening happens. sent4: that the breakfasting does not occur is brought about by that the implementation does not occur. sent5: if the pull happens then that the bulimicness does not occur and/or the inspissation occurs is not right. sent6: if the implementation does not occur the tormenting subjunctive does not occur and the breakfast does not occur. sent7: not the concussion but the prolixness occurs. sent8: if that the acceleration but not the atonicness occurs does not hold that the tormenting subjunctive does not occur is right. sent9: that the bayoneting mystic does not occur brings about that the stirring does not occur and the breakfast does not occur. sent10: the fact that the concussion and the prolixness occurs does not hold if the implementation happens. sent11: if the implementation occurs then the fact that the concussion does not occur but the prolixness occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the implementation occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that not the concussion but the prolixness happens is not correct is correct.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the implementation does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__