the Snow occurs.
sent1: the achondroplasticness happens. sent2: the anticancerness does not occur if the fact that that both the anticancerness and the roboticness happens is correct is not correct. sent3: if that the readjustment does not occur and the uncivilness does not occur is wrong then the synergisticness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the roboticness occurs but the trick does not occur does not hold if that the medicolegalness does not occur hold. sent5: the sacrament occurs. sent6: if the synergisticness does not occur then the fact that not the tuning but the medicolegalness happens does not hold. sent7: the medicolegalness does not occur if that both the tuning and the medicolegalness occurs is not right. sent8: that both the non-achondroplasticness and the non-heavy-dutyness happens is incorrect if the interiorness occurs. sent9: the interiorness occurs if the interiorness or the non-anticancerness or both happens. sent10: that the Snow does not occur is caused by that the achondroplasticness happens and the heavy-dutiness happens. sent11: that both the tuning and the medicolegalness occurs is incorrect if the synergisticness does not occur. sent12: that the heavy-dutiness does not occur triggers that the approach does not occur and the achondroplasticness occurs. sent13: the heavy-dutiness occurs. sent14: the scaling razorbill happens. sent15: the flocking happens. sent16: if the medicolegalness does not occur the fact that the trick does not occur is correct. sent17: the Snow and the interiorness occurs if the anticancerness does not occur. sent18: if the fact that the roboticness but not the trick happens is false then the anticancerness does not occur.
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: both the achondroplasticness and the heavy-dutiness happens.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the approaching does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Snow occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the achondroplasticness happens. sent2: the anticancerness does not occur if the fact that that both the anticancerness and the roboticness happens is correct is not correct. sent3: if that the readjustment does not occur and the uncivilness does not occur is wrong then the synergisticness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the roboticness occurs but the trick does not occur does not hold if that the medicolegalness does not occur hold. sent5: the sacrament occurs. sent6: if the synergisticness does not occur then the fact that not the tuning but the medicolegalness happens does not hold. sent7: the medicolegalness does not occur if that both the tuning and the medicolegalness occurs is not right. sent8: that both the non-achondroplasticness and the non-heavy-dutyness happens is incorrect if the interiorness occurs. sent9: the interiorness occurs if the interiorness or the non-anticancerness or both happens. sent10: that the Snow does not occur is caused by that the achondroplasticness happens and the heavy-dutiness happens. sent11: that both the tuning and the medicolegalness occurs is incorrect if the synergisticness does not occur. sent12: that the heavy-dutiness does not occur triggers that the approach does not occur and the achondroplasticness occurs. sent13: the heavy-dutiness occurs. sent14: the scaling razorbill happens. sent15: the flocking happens. sent16: if the medicolegalness does not occur the fact that the trick does not occur is correct. sent17: the Snow and the interiorness occurs if the anticancerness does not occur. sent18: if the fact that the roboticness but not the trick happens is false then the anticancerness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: both the achondroplasticness and the heavy-dutiness happens.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__