the fact that the claustrum is not a kind of a tasting if the tutu is nonimitative and it is a puncher is wrong.
sent1: if the claustrum is not a puncher that the tutu folds trinketry and is imitative is wrong. sent2: that the streaker is asleep and is a acatalectic does not hold if the Adam is not lawful. sent3: something does beep Hygeia if it is a tasting. sent4: the special is not a kind of a boo. sent5: something that beeps Hygeia is not a kind of a puncher. sent6: if the tutu is nonimitative then it folds trinketry. sent7: if the tutu does fold trinketry then the claustrum does fold trinketry and does not taste. sent8: the marker is imitative if the fact that the tutu folds trinketry and is not imitative is not true. sent9: if there is something such that it does not boo that the Adam is lawful thing that platinizes Ochna is not true. sent10: if that something is a kind of lawful thing that does platinize Ochna is not true it is not lawful.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tutu is nonimitative a puncher.; assump1 -> int1: the tutu is nonimitative.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the tutu folds trinketry.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the claustrum does fold trinketry but it does not taste.; int3 -> int4: the claustrum is not a kind of a tasting.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the marker is not nonimitative is not false.
sent5 -> int5: if the claustrum does beep Hygeia then it is not a puncher.; sent3 -> int6: the claustrum beeps Hygeia if the fact that it does taste is not wrong.; sent10 -> int7: if that the Adam is lawful and does platinize Ochna is wrong it is not lawful.; sent4 -> int8: there is something such that it does not boo.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the Adam is lawful and it does platinize Ochna is not right.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the Adam is not lawful.; sent2 & int10 -> int11: that the streaker is asleep a acatalectic is wrong.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is asleep and is a acatalectic is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the claustrum is not a kind of a tasting if the tutu is nonimitative and it is a puncher is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the claustrum is not a puncher that the tutu folds trinketry and is imitative is wrong. sent2: that the streaker is asleep and is a acatalectic does not hold if the Adam is not lawful. sent3: something does beep Hygeia if it is a tasting. sent4: the special is not a kind of a boo. sent5: something that beeps Hygeia is not a kind of a puncher. sent6: if the tutu is nonimitative then it folds trinketry. sent7: if the tutu does fold trinketry then the claustrum does fold trinketry and does not taste. sent8: the marker is imitative if the fact that the tutu folds trinketry and is not imitative is not true. sent9: if there is something such that it does not boo that the Adam is lawful thing that platinizes Ochna is not true. sent10: if that something is a kind of lawful thing that does platinize Ochna is not true it is not lawful. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tutu is nonimitative a puncher.; assump1 -> int1: the tutu is nonimitative.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the tutu folds trinketry.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the claustrum does fold trinketry but it does not taste.; int3 -> int4: the claustrum is not a kind of a tasting.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__