if the Soma is not a kind of a myriad then the Kenyan is not a backbench and is Bosnian.
sent1: if the abhorrer is not a backbench then the Kenyan does not administer nutrition and is Bosnian. sent2: the Kenyan is a kind of a backbench that is Bosnian. sent3: if the Kenyan is not a backbench the abhorrer does not homestead glassblower and is Bosnian. sent4: if the abhorrer does not administer nutrition then the Kenyan is not a backbench but it is Bosnian. sent5: that the Soma does not homestead glassblower is right. sent6: the blanc does not homestead glassblower if that that the abhorrer is not a kind of a backbench and it does not administer nutrition is not false does not hold. sent7: if that the abhorrer administers nutrition is correct then that it is not a hymenopteran and it homesteads glassblower is not true. sent8: the fact that the abhorrer is not a kind of a backbench and it does not administer nutrition is not right if it is a kind of a abampere. sent9: that the Soma is a kind of a myriad and it is a backbench is wrong. sent10: the abhorrer is a kind of a abampere. sent11: if the Soma does not homestead glassblower then the abhorrer is not a myriad but it is a backbench. sent12: the abhorrer is not a kind of a backbench but it is a kind of a myriad if the Kenyan homesteads glassblower. sent13: the Soma is a myriad if the fact that the abhorrer is not a kind of a hymenopteran and does homestead glassblower does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the Soma is not a myriad hold the Kenyan does administer nutrition and is a backbench. sent15: that the abhorrer is a retention hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the abhorrer administers nutrition.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the abhorrer is not a hymenopteran and homesteads glassblower is false.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the Soma is a kind of a myriad.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Soma is not a myriad.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the abhorrer does not administer nutrition.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the Kenyan is not a backbench but it is Bosnian.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the blanc does not homestead glassblower and is a mural.
sent8 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the abhorrer is not a backbench and does not administer nutrition is incorrect.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the blanc does not homestead glassblower hold.;
$hypothesis$ = if the Soma is not a kind of a myriad then the Kenyan is not a backbench and is Bosnian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the abhorrer is not a backbench then the Kenyan does not administer nutrition and is Bosnian. sent2: the Kenyan is a kind of a backbench that is Bosnian. sent3: if the Kenyan is not a backbench the abhorrer does not homestead glassblower and is Bosnian. sent4: if the abhorrer does not administer nutrition then the Kenyan is not a backbench but it is Bosnian. sent5: that the Soma does not homestead glassblower is right. sent6: the blanc does not homestead glassblower if that that the abhorrer is not a kind of a backbench and it does not administer nutrition is not false does not hold. sent7: if that the abhorrer administers nutrition is correct then that it is not a hymenopteran and it homesteads glassblower is not true. sent8: the fact that the abhorrer is not a kind of a backbench and it does not administer nutrition is not right if it is a kind of a abampere. sent9: that the Soma is a kind of a myriad and it is a backbench is wrong. sent10: the abhorrer is a kind of a abampere. sent11: if the Soma does not homestead glassblower then the abhorrer is not a myriad but it is a backbench. sent12: the abhorrer is not a kind of a backbench but it is a kind of a myriad if the Kenyan homesteads glassblower. sent13: the Soma is a myriad if the fact that the abhorrer is not a kind of a hymenopteran and does homestead glassblower does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the Soma is not a myriad hold the Kenyan does administer nutrition and is a backbench. sent15: that the abhorrer is a retention hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the abhorrer administers nutrition.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the abhorrer is not a hymenopteran and homesteads glassblower is false.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the Soma is a kind of a myriad.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Soma is not a myriad.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the abhorrer does not administer nutrition.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the Kenyan is not a backbench but it is Bosnian.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__