that both the mutter and the puzzle occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the lindy does not occur. sent2: if the jarring dolphinfish does not occur then that the mutter happens and the puzzling happens does not hold. sent3: that the phrasalness and the insectivorousness happens prevents the cleaning. sent4: the uncleanness and the indigestibleness happens. sent5: that the shortstop occurs brings about that the insectivorousness does not occur and the cleaning happens. sent6: if the insectivorousness does not occur the fact that the favoritism does not occur but the phrasalness occurs is not right. sent7: that the monotheisticness occurs is not incorrect. sent8: the terminologicalness occurs. sent9: if the lindy does not occur then the favoritism and the edging occurs. sent10: the favoritism does not occur if the fact that both the squaredness and the colonialness occurs does not hold. sent11: that the edge does not occur triggers that the mutter happens and the jarring dolphinfish happens. sent12: the fact that the squared occurs and the colonial occurs is not true if that the phrasalness does not occur is not wrong. sent13: that the insectivorousness but not the shortstop happens is caused by that the Ruritanian occurs. sent14: the edging happens. sent15: both the Ruritanianness and the nightcap occurs. sent16: the edge happens if the fact that the lindy does not occur is not false. sent17: if the fact that the favoritism does not occur but the phrasalness occurs is not true the puzzle occurs. sent18: if the Ruritanianness happens then the shortstop does not occur. sent19: the fact that both the propulsiveness and the grate happens is not right. sent20: the shortstop happens if the douching happens. sent21: the jarring dolphinfish does not occur if the cleaning does not occur. sent22: the fact that the Sadduceanness and the Ghanaianness happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phrasalness does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the squared occurs and the colonialness occurs is not correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the favoritism does not occur.; sent9 & sent1 -> int3: both the favoritism and the edging occurs.; int3 -> int4: the favoritism occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the phrasalness happens.; sent15 -> int7: the Ruritanianness happens.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the insectivorousness happens but the shortstop does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the insectivorousness occurs.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the phrasalness happens and the insectivorousness occurs.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: that the cleaningness does not occur is not false.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the jarring dolphinfish does not occur.; int12 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Sadduceanness and the Ghanaianness happens does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the mutter and the puzzle occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the lindy does not occur. sent2: if the jarring dolphinfish does not occur then that the mutter happens and the puzzling happens does not hold. sent3: that the phrasalness and the insectivorousness happens prevents the cleaning. sent4: the uncleanness and the indigestibleness happens. sent5: that the shortstop occurs brings about that the insectivorousness does not occur and the cleaning happens. sent6: if the insectivorousness does not occur the fact that the favoritism does not occur but the phrasalness occurs is not right. sent7: that the monotheisticness occurs is not incorrect. sent8: the terminologicalness occurs. sent9: if the lindy does not occur then the favoritism and the edging occurs. sent10: the favoritism does not occur if the fact that both the squaredness and the colonialness occurs does not hold. sent11: that the edge does not occur triggers that the mutter happens and the jarring dolphinfish happens. sent12: the fact that the squared occurs and the colonial occurs is not true if that the phrasalness does not occur is not wrong. sent13: that the insectivorousness but not the shortstop happens is caused by that the Ruritanian occurs. sent14: the edging happens. sent15: both the Ruritanianness and the nightcap occurs. sent16: the edge happens if the fact that the lindy does not occur is not false. sent17: if the fact that the favoritism does not occur but the phrasalness occurs is not true the puzzle occurs. sent18: if the Ruritanianness happens then the shortstop does not occur. sent19: the fact that both the propulsiveness and the grate happens is not right. sent20: the shortstop happens if the douching happens. sent21: the jarring dolphinfish does not occur if the cleaning does not occur. sent22: the fact that the Sadduceanness and the Ghanaianness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phrasalness does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the squared occurs and the colonialness occurs is not correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the favoritism does not occur.; sent9 & sent1 -> int3: both the favoritism and the edging occurs.; int3 -> int4: the favoritism occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the phrasalness happens.; sent15 -> int7: the Ruritanianness happens.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the insectivorousness happens but the shortstop does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the insectivorousness occurs.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the phrasalness happens and the insectivorousness occurs.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: that the cleaningness does not occur is not false.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the jarring dolphinfish does not occur.; int12 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__