the cupbearer is a Berlioz.
sent1: the fact that the cupbearer is brachycephalic and it is a kind of a Berlioz does not hold. sent2: something is not a numismatist if the fact that that it is a kind of a numismatist that is telephonic hold is false. sent3: a bursal thing does not indurate blunderbuss and is a parthenote. sent4: the seat is not non-brachycephalic if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Berlioz and it is not a kind of a diaphoretic does not hold. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a diaphoretic and does not tout crosse is not incorrect is not correct the seat is a Berlioz. sent6: the seat does clap polemics. sent7: the goose is bursal if it is a roentgen. sent8: the cupbearer is a kind of a Berlioz if that the clover is diaphoretic hold. sent9: that the seat is a brachycephalic but it does not tout crosse is incorrect. sent10: if something is plumbaginaceous it is a Berlioz and not a diaphoretic. sent11: the seat is a diaphoretic. sent12: the cupbearer is diaphoretic if there is something such that it is a kind of a Berlioz. sent13: if something does not clap apex then the fact that it is a kind of a numismatist and it is telephonic is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a numismatist then it is a roentgen and it is benevolent. sent15: the clover is bursal if the goose is bursal. sent16: there exists something such that it is a kind of a brachycephalic and is not a kind of a Berlioz. sent17: if there is something such that it does tout crosse the seat is a diaphoretic. sent18: everything does not clap apex. sent19: something is a kind of a brachycephalic that is not a kind of a diaphoretic. sent20: there exists something such that that it touts crosse and it is not a kind of a Berlioz is not true. sent21: the clover is a kind of a diaphoretic if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a brachycephalic and it does not tout crosse is not true. sent22: the clover is a kind of a Berlioz.
sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a brachycephalic that does not tout crosse is not right.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the clover is a diaphoretic.; sent8 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the blunderbuss is a Berlioz.
sent10 -> int3: the blunderbuss is a Berlioz but it is not a diaphoretic if it is plumbaginaceous.;
$hypothesis$ = the cupbearer is a Berlioz. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cupbearer is brachycephalic and it is a kind of a Berlioz does not hold. sent2: something is not a numismatist if the fact that that it is a kind of a numismatist that is telephonic hold is false. sent3: a bursal thing does not indurate blunderbuss and is a parthenote. sent4: the seat is not non-brachycephalic if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Berlioz and it is not a kind of a diaphoretic does not hold. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a diaphoretic and does not tout crosse is not incorrect is not correct the seat is a Berlioz. sent6: the seat does clap polemics. sent7: the goose is bursal if it is a roentgen. sent8: the cupbearer is a kind of a Berlioz if that the clover is diaphoretic hold. sent9: that the seat is a brachycephalic but it does not tout crosse is incorrect. sent10: if something is plumbaginaceous it is a Berlioz and not a diaphoretic. sent11: the seat is a diaphoretic. sent12: the cupbearer is diaphoretic if there is something such that it is a kind of a Berlioz. sent13: if something does not clap apex then the fact that it is a kind of a numismatist and it is telephonic is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a numismatist then it is a roentgen and it is benevolent. sent15: the clover is bursal if the goose is bursal. sent16: there exists something such that it is a kind of a brachycephalic and is not a kind of a Berlioz. sent17: if there is something such that it does tout crosse the seat is a diaphoretic. sent18: everything does not clap apex. sent19: something is a kind of a brachycephalic that is not a kind of a diaphoretic. sent20: there exists something such that that it touts crosse and it is not a kind of a Berlioz is not true. sent21: the clover is a kind of a diaphoretic if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a brachycephalic and it does not tout crosse is not true. sent22: the clover is a kind of a Berlioz. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a brachycephalic that does not tout crosse is not right.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the clover is a diaphoretic.; sent8 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__