the moonshell does ignore Atropidae but it is not a kind of a scalar.
sent1: the fact that if the fact that the lamivudine does not fruit is right the moonshell ignores Atropidae but it is not a kind of a scalar is right. sent2: the fact that something does ignore Atropidae but it is not a kind of a scalar is wrong if it does not flick Ustilago. sent3: the moonshell ignores Atropidae if it does consociate. sent4: the Courtelle does not ignore Atropidae. sent5: the Chiron does not consociate. sent6: the towpath does not varnish towpath and is lesser. sent7: The Ustilago flicks Courtelle. sent8: the lamivudine is not a fruit if the Courtelle is not a hereditarianism but it does consociate. sent9: the Courtelle is not a hereditarianism. sent10: the Courtelle is not a fruit if the lamivudine is not a hereditarianism. sent11: the Courtelle flicks Ustilago.
that the moonshell does ignore Atropidae but it is non-scalar is incorrect.
sent2 -> int1: if the moonshell does not flick Ustilago then that it does ignore Atropidae and is not a scalar is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the moonshell does ignore Atropidae but it is not a kind of a scalar. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the fact that the lamivudine does not fruit is right the moonshell ignores Atropidae but it is not a kind of a scalar is right. sent2: the fact that something does ignore Atropidae but it is not a kind of a scalar is wrong if it does not flick Ustilago. sent3: the moonshell ignores Atropidae if it does consociate. sent4: the Courtelle does not ignore Atropidae. sent5: the Chiron does not consociate. sent6: the towpath does not varnish towpath and is lesser. sent7: The Ustilago flicks Courtelle. sent8: the lamivudine is not a fruit if the Courtelle is not a hereditarianism but it does consociate. sent9: the Courtelle is not a hereditarianism. sent10: the Courtelle is not a fruit if the lamivudine is not a hereditarianism. sent11: the Courtelle flicks Ustilago. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__