that there exists something such that the fact that it facilitates or is not non-steep or both is incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: the Sinologist is both a endlessness and not a rice. sent2: if something does backstop outpost it is untraceable. sent3: that something is a kind of non-anosmic thing that does not facilitate is wrong if it is steep. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a steep is not false. sent5: the fact that the parrot either facilitates or steeps or both is false if the Basil does not lecture Albulidae. sent6: there is something such that it does not facilitate. sent7: if something does backstop luxuriation then it does backstop outpost. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not anosmic and it does not facilitate does not hold then the feverfew does not lecture Albulidae. sent9: if the feverfew is non-vitiliginous and is not clausal then the Basil is not anosmic. sent10: the feverfew is not clausal. sent11: the parrot is steep if the valley is untraceable. sent12: something facilitates and/or is steep. sent13: the parrot does not steep. sent14: if the Basil does not lecture Albulidae the parrot is not a kind of a steep. sent15: if the feverfew does not lecture Albulidae then that the Basil is a ketorolac and/or it is healthy is wrong. sent16: a non-anosmic thing does not lecture Albulidae. sent17: the feverfew is not vitiliginous and not clausal.
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that the Basil is not anosmic is right.; sent16 -> int2: the Basil does not lecture Albulidae if it is non-anosmic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Basil does not lecture Albulidae is correct.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that that the parrot either does facilitate or does steep or both is not false is not right.; int4 -> hypothesis;
that that the Basil either is a kind of a ketorolac or is healthy or both does not hold is true.
sent3 -> int5: the fact that the parrot is not anosmic and it does not facilitate is not correct if it is a kind of a steep.; sent2 -> int6: if the valley does backstop outpost then it is untraceable.; sent7 -> int7: the valley does backstop outpost if the fact that it backstops luxuriation is correct.; sent1 -> int8: something is a endlessness and is not a rice.;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that the fact that it facilitates or is not non-steep or both is incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Sinologist is both a endlessness and not a rice. sent2: if something does backstop outpost it is untraceable. sent3: that something is a kind of non-anosmic thing that does not facilitate is wrong if it is steep. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a steep is not false. sent5: the fact that the parrot either facilitates or steeps or both is false if the Basil does not lecture Albulidae. sent6: there is something such that it does not facilitate. sent7: if something does backstop luxuriation then it does backstop outpost. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not anosmic and it does not facilitate does not hold then the feverfew does not lecture Albulidae. sent9: if the feverfew is non-vitiliginous and is not clausal then the Basil is not anosmic. sent10: the feverfew is not clausal. sent11: the parrot is steep if the valley is untraceable. sent12: something facilitates and/or is steep. sent13: the parrot does not steep. sent14: if the Basil does not lecture Albulidae the parrot is not a kind of a steep. sent15: if the feverfew does not lecture Albulidae then that the Basil is a ketorolac and/or it is healthy is wrong. sent16: a non-anosmic thing does not lecture Albulidae. sent17: the feverfew is not vitiliginous and not clausal. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that the Basil is not anosmic is right.; sent16 -> int2: the Basil does not lecture Albulidae if it is non-anosmic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Basil does not lecture Albulidae is correct.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that that the parrot either does facilitate or does steep or both is not false is not right.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__