the killer does not orchestrate helpfulness and/or it is many.
sent1: if the killer does orchestrate helpfulness then the Lord orchestrate helpfulness and/or it is many. sent2: if the Lord does orchestrate helpfulness then the killer does not orchestrate helpfulness and/or it is many. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Dean hold. sent4: that the jumble is both not a holocaust and not a Dean is incorrect. sent5: something is not a tenter if that it is not a holocaust and it is not a Dean is not right. sent6: the Lord is a kind of a splenius if the void is a kind of a jiggered. sent7: something does orchestrate helpfulness and it is many if it does not burglarize reticulation. sent8: if something is kinesthetic it is not a kind of a splenius and it does not burglarize reticulation. sent9: everything is a jiggered. sent10: the fact that the fact that the Transportation is a splenius and does not orchestrate helpfulness is not wrong is not correct if it is not a jiggered. sent11: the wallow does not burglarize reticulation if the Lord is impressionistic but not kinesthetic. sent12: the bankrupt is a jiggered. sent13: the Lord is not non-impressionistic but non-kinesthetic if the killer is a tenter. sent14: if the sulky is both not a starting and a thecodont then the jumble is a starting. sent15: if the sulky is not kinesthetic and it is not impressionistic then the jumble is kinesthetic. sent16: if something that is not a splenius does not burglarize reticulation then the Lord is not a jiggered. sent17: something is a splenius if it is a jiggered. sent18: something is a splenius if it orchestrates helpfulness. sent19: the killer orchestrates helpfulness and/or it is many. sent20: if that the Lord does orchestrate helpfulness is not wrong then either the killer does orchestrate helpfulness or it is many or both. sent21: if that the jumble is not a kind of a tenter but it is a kind of a starting is right then the killer is a tenter. sent22: something is not kinesthetic and it is not impressionistic if it is a tenter. sent23: the Lord does orchestrate helpfulness if the void is a kind of a splenius. sent24: if the fact that something is a splenius hold then the fact that it is a jiggered is not wrong.
sent9 -> int1: the void is a jiggered.; sent17 -> int2: the void is a splenius if it is a kind of a jiggered.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the void is not a kind of a splenius is not correct.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the Lord orchestrates helpfulness.; int4 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the killer does not orchestrate helpfulness and/or it is many does not hold.
sent8 -> int5: if the jumble is not non-kinesthetic it is not a splenius and it does not burglarize reticulation.; sent22 -> int6: the sulky is not kinesthetic and it is not impressionistic if it is a kind of a tenter.;
$hypothesis$ = the killer does not orchestrate helpfulness and/or it is many. ; $context$ = sent1: if the killer does orchestrate helpfulness then the Lord orchestrate helpfulness and/or it is many. sent2: if the Lord does orchestrate helpfulness then the killer does not orchestrate helpfulness and/or it is many. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Dean hold. sent4: that the jumble is both not a holocaust and not a Dean is incorrect. sent5: something is not a tenter if that it is not a holocaust and it is not a Dean is not right. sent6: the Lord is a kind of a splenius if the void is a kind of a jiggered. sent7: something does orchestrate helpfulness and it is many if it does not burglarize reticulation. sent8: if something is kinesthetic it is not a kind of a splenius and it does not burglarize reticulation. sent9: everything is a jiggered. sent10: the fact that the fact that the Transportation is a splenius and does not orchestrate helpfulness is not wrong is not correct if it is not a jiggered. sent11: the wallow does not burglarize reticulation if the Lord is impressionistic but not kinesthetic. sent12: the bankrupt is a jiggered. sent13: the Lord is not non-impressionistic but non-kinesthetic if the killer is a tenter. sent14: if the sulky is both not a starting and a thecodont then the jumble is a starting. sent15: if the sulky is not kinesthetic and it is not impressionistic then the jumble is kinesthetic. sent16: if something that is not a splenius does not burglarize reticulation then the Lord is not a jiggered. sent17: something is a splenius if it is a jiggered. sent18: something is a splenius if it orchestrates helpfulness. sent19: the killer orchestrates helpfulness and/or it is many. sent20: if that the Lord does orchestrate helpfulness is not wrong then either the killer does orchestrate helpfulness or it is many or both. sent21: if that the jumble is not a kind of a tenter but it is a kind of a starting is right then the killer is a tenter. sent22: something is not kinesthetic and it is not impressionistic if it is a tenter. sent23: the Lord does orchestrate helpfulness if the void is a kind of a splenius. sent24: if the fact that something is a splenius hold then the fact that it is a jiggered is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the void is a jiggered.; sent17 -> int2: the void is a splenius if it is a kind of a jiggered.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the void is not a kind of a splenius is not correct.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the Lord orchestrates helpfulness.; int4 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__