the fire-bush yields swathing.
sent1: if the fact that the darky does job pearlfish and is not osteal hold it is not chromatographic. sent2: the fire-bush does not yield swathing if it does huff and it is not cerebellar. sent3: if the fire-bush is not cerebellar the fact that the darky is not chromatographic but it is cerebellar does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that it does not huff. sent5: the fire-bush does huff and is not cerebellar if something is not unsusceptible. sent6: that the fire-bush does not yield swathing is true if it is a meditation and it is non-osteal. sent7: if the darky is a kind of non-chromatographic thing that is not a kind of a meditation it is not osteal. sent8: the darky is not unsusceptible if the fact that it is not chromatographic and it is not a meditation does not hold. sent9: the darky is not a meditation but it is cerebellar. sent10: if the darky is not osteal the fact that that the commodore does not job pearlfish and is osteal is not wrong is not correct. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a meditation is not false. sent12: if that the commodore does not job pearlfish and it is not chromatographic is false then it is not osteal. sent13: the fire-bush huffs. sent14: that the fire-bush does not yield swathing and is cerebellar is false if the darky is not cerebellar. sent15: the fire-bush is a kind of a chug that is not a honk. sent16: that the fire-bush is osteal but it is not a kind of a haloperidol is not correct. sent17: the fact that the fire-bush is not a meditation and does not yield swathing is not true. sent18: the fact that the fire-bush is not unsusceptible and does yield swathing is not true. sent19: the commodore does not job pearlfish but it is osteal. sent20: if the darky is chromatographic and it does huff then it is not osteal. sent21: that the darky does not yield swathing and it is not unsusceptible is not correct. sent22: the fire-bush is Erasmian. sent23: the commodore is non-osteal if that it does not huff and it is not a meditation is not correct. sent24: the commodore is not a Browning and does not disembowel neem. sent25: if that the fact that the parricide does not yield ionosphere and it is not onymous is not wrong is incorrect then it does not yield darky. sent26: the darky does not job pearlfish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the darky is not chromatographic and is not a meditation.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the darky is not osteal.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the commodore does not job pearlfish and is osteal does not hold.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the darky is not chromatographic and is not a kind of a meditation is not true.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the darky is not unsusceptible.; int5 -> int6: there are non-unsusceptible things.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the fire-bush does huff and is not cerebellar.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fire-bush yields swathing. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the darky does job pearlfish and is not osteal hold it is not chromatographic. sent2: the fire-bush does not yield swathing if it does huff and it is not cerebellar. sent3: if the fire-bush is not cerebellar the fact that the darky is not chromatographic but it is cerebellar does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that it does not huff. sent5: the fire-bush does huff and is not cerebellar if something is not unsusceptible. sent6: that the fire-bush does not yield swathing is true if it is a meditation and it is non-osteal. sent7: if the darky is a kind of non-chromatographic thing that is not a kind of a meditation it is not osteal. sent8: the darky is not unsusceptible if the fact that it is not chromatographic and it is not a meditation does not hold. sent9: the darky is not a meditation but it is cerebellar. sent10: if the darky is not osteal the fact that that the commodore does not job pearlfish and is osteal is not wrong is not correct. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a meditation is not false. sent12: if that the commodore does not job pearlfish and it is not chromatographic is false then it is not osteal. sent13: the fire-bush huffs. sent14: that the fire-bush does not yield swathing and is cerebellar is false if the darky is not cerebellar. sent15: the fire-bush is a kind of a chug that is not a honk. sent16: that the fire-bush is osteal but it is not a kind of a haloperidol is not correct. sent17: the fact that the fire-bush is not a meditation and does not yield swathing is not true. sent18: the fact that the fire-bush is not unsusceptible and does yield swathing is not true. sent19: the commodore does not job pearlfish but it is osteal. sent20: if the darky is chromatographic and it does huff then it is not osteal. sent21: that the darky does not yield swathing and it is not unsusceptible is not correct. sent22: the fire-bush is Erasmian. sent23: the commodore is non-osteal if that it does not huff and it is not a meditation is not correct. sent24: the commodore is not a Browning and does not disembowel neem. sent25: if that the fact that the parricide does not yield ionosphere and it is not onymous is not wrong is incorrect then it does not yield darky. sent26: the darky does not job pearlfish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the darky is not chromatographic and is not a meditation.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the darky is not osteal.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the commodore does not job pearlfish and is osteal does not hold.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the darky is not chromatographic and is not a kind of a meditation is not true.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the darky is not unsusceptible.; int5 -> int6: there are non-unsusceptible things.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the fire-bush does huff and is not cerebellar.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__