the abstemiousness is triggered by that the heartbreaker occurs.
sent1: that not the heartbreaker but the abstemiousness happens prevents the rehabilitation. sent2: if the commanding soled does not occur the vegetativeness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the prostate does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the boodle does not occur then the ensnaring does not occur but the stabling GDP occurs. sent5: the fact that the alienableness does not occur is correct. sent6: that the abstemiousness does not occur yields that the heartbreaker does not occur. sent7: the apetalousness occurs. sent8: that the crapette does not occur causes that the stabling militainment does not occur. sent9: the dab does not occur. sent10: if that the ensnaring does not occur is true then both the botulinalness and the risking outfield happens. sent11: that the heartbreaker does not occur and the abstemiousness occurs is triggered by that the risking outfield happens. sent12: the headmistressship occurs. sent13: if the attractiveness occurs then the rbi occurs. sent14: the shedding does not occur. sent15: the noncrystallineness does not occur. sent16: that the covalentness happens is not false. sent17: the non-postwarness is prevented by that the transplant occurs. sent18: the perseveration happens. sent19: the heartbreaker does not occur if that the abstemiousness happens is not false. sent20: that the abstemiousness does not occur triggers the heartbreaker. sent21: the fact that the augury does not occur is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abstemiousness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the heartbreaker does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the heartbreaker happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the abstemiousness happens.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the rehabilitation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the abstemiousness is triggered by that the heartbreaker occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the heartbreaker but the abstemiousness happens prevents the rehabilitation. sent2: if the commanding soled does not occur the vegetativeness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the prostate does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the boodle does not occur then the ensnaring does not occur but the stabling GDP occurs. sent5: the fact that the alienableness does not occur is correct. sent6: that the abstemiousness does not occur yields that the heartbreaker does not occur. sent7: the apetalousness occurs. sent8: that the crapette does not occur causes that the stabling militainment does not occur. sent9: the dab does not occur. sent10: if that the ensnaring does not occur is true then both the botulinalness and the risking outfield happens. sent11: that the heartbreaker does not occur and the abstemiousness occurs is triggered by that the risking outfield happens. sent12: the headmistressship occurs. sent13: if the attractiveness occurs then the rbi occurs. sent14: the shedding does not occur. sent15: the noncrystallineness does not occur. sent16: that the covalentness happens is not false. sent17: the non-postwarness is prevented by that the transplant occurs. sent18: the perseveration happens. sent19: the heartbreaker does not occur if that the abstemiousness happens is not false. sent20: that the abstemiousness does not occur triggers the heartbreaker. sent21: the fact that the augury does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abstemiousness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the heartbreaker does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the heartbreaker happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the abstemiousness happens.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__