there is something such that if it is a Altair then that it is juridical and it is not a kind of a soaring does not hold.
sent1: the condenser is not non-juridical but it does not soar if it is a kind of a Altair. sent2: there exists something such that if it does collar Simarouba then that it is annunciatory and it is not a planet is not right. sent3: if the organelle is juridical the fact that it is a kind of an antioxidant that broadsides Turkmen does not hold. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Altair it is juridical and it does not soar. sent5: if the condenser is a Altair the fact that it is juridical and it soars is wrong. sent6: if the condenser is an unwillingness then it dins and is not a kind of a soaring. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Altair then the fact that it is a kind of juridical thing that soars is wrong. sent8: if the condenser is a Altair the fact that it is juridical and it does not soar is not right. sent9: that there is something such that if that it is a kind of a Sculptor is not false then the fact that it is a sleekness and it does not broadside bluntness is wrong is correct. sent10: if the condenser is a brakes that it is a Worcester and soars is incorrect. sent11: that something is both juridical and not angular does not hold if it is a rain. sent12: the fact that the condenser is both earless and not a doorstop is not right if it is a kind of a Altair. sent13: the fact that the condenser does collar organelle and is a Hallel is wrong if it is a kind of a Altair. sent14: if the condenser is inadmissible then that it is orthodox and it is not a parley is wrong. sent15: that the condenser bankrupts and it is a Altair is not right if it is a rain. sent16: if the chemosynthesis does expire blastomycete then that it is a Altair and it is a thyroid is not right.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
if the three does rain the fact that it is both juridical and not angular is not true.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a Altair then that it is juridical and it is not a kind of a soaring does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the condenser is not non-juridical but it does not soar if it is a kind of a Altair. sent2: there exists something such that if it does collar Simarouba then that it is annunciatory and it is not a planet is not right. sent3: if the organelle is juridical the fact that it is a kind of an antioxidant that broadsides Turkmen does not hold. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Altair it is juridical and it does not soar. sent5: if the condenser is a Altair the fact that it is juridical and it soars is wrong. sent6: if the condenser is an unwillingness then it dins and is not a kind of a soaring. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Altair then the fact that it is a kind of juridical thing that soars is wrong. sent8: if the condenser is a Altair the fact that it is juridical and it does not soar is not right. sent9: that there is something such that if that it is a kind of a Sculptor is not false then the fact that it is a sleekness and it does not broadside bluntness is wrong is correct. sent10: if the condenser is a brakes that it is a Worcester and soars is incorrect. sent11: that something is both juridical and not angular does not hold if it is a rain. sent12: the fact that the condenser is both earless and not a doorstop is not right if it is a kind of a Altair. sent13: the fact that the condenser does collar organelle and is a Hallel is wrong if it is a kind of a Altair. sent14: if the condenser is inadmissible then that it is orthodox and it is not a parley is wrong. sent15: that the condenser bankrupts and it is a Altair is not right if it is a rain. sent16: if the chemosynthesis does expire blastomycete then that it is a Altair and it is a thyroid is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__