the fact that the snood is plus and it is neurotropic is not true.
sent1: that the snood is plus and is a kind of a Attilio is not right if the fact that the madrepore is not a Attilio is not false. sent2: the fact that the toque does protuberate and is a acatalectic is not right. sent3: the madrepore does not jam Akwa'ala. sent4: the fact that the Lasso is a voicemail is not false. sent5: if the madrepore is not neurotropic it is not a kind of a fungible. sent6: the madrepore is not a Haemosporidia. sent7: the fiefdom is not neurotropic. sent8: that the Lasso is neurotropic and it is a Attilio is incorrect. sent9: that the shoji is neurotropic is not wrong. sent10: the madrepore is not a fungible if the fact that the Lasso is a fungible is true. sent11: the fact that the Lasso is a kind of neurotropic thing that is a Attilio is wrong if the fact that the madrepore is a Attilio does not hold. sent12: the Lasso does not intervene and is not a electrocutioner. sent13: the fact that the madrepore is not a fungible is true. sent14: if the Lasso is not a kind of a Attilio then it is not parietal. sent15: the midiron is plus. sent16: if the snood is autoimmune it is plus. sent17: the Lasso is not non-parietal and is a fungible. sent18: if the madrepore is not neurotropic it is not plus. sent19: the Lasso does not jam broomstick if it is not calculous. sent20: the madrepore is not parietal. sent21: that the snood is plus and it is neurotropic is not right if the madrepore is not neurotropic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Lasso is not a Attilio.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the Lasso is non-parietal.; sent17 -> int2: the fact that the Lasso is parietal is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Lasso is a kind of a Attilio.;
the snood is plus and neurotropic.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the snood is plus and it is neurotropic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the snood is plus and is a kind of a Attilio is not right if the fact that the madrepore is not a Attilio is not false. sent2: the fact that the toque does protuberate and is a acatalectic is not right. sent3: the madrepore does not jam Akwa'ala. sent4: the fact that the Lasso is a voicemail is not false. sent5: if the madrepore is not neurotropic it is not a kind of a fungible. sent6: the madrepore is not a Haemosporidia. sent7: the fiefdom is not neurotropic. sent8: that the Lasso is neurotropic and it is a Attilio is incorrect. sent9: that the shoji is neurotropic is not wrong. sent10: the madrepore is not a fungible if the fact that the Lasso is a fungible is true. sent11: the fact that the Lasso is a kind of neurotropic thing that is a Attilio is wrong if the fact that the madrepore is a Attilio does not hold. sent12: the Lasso does not intervene and is not a electrocutioner. sent13: the fact that the madrepore is not a fungible is true. sent14: if the Lasso is not a kind of a Attilio then it is not parietal. sent15: the midiron is plus. sent16: if the snood is autoimmune it is plus. sent17: the Lasso is not non-parietal and is a fungible. sent18: if the madrepore is not neurotropic it is not plus. sent19: the Lasso does not jam broomstick if it is not calculous. sent20: the madrepore is not parietal. sent21: that the snood is plus and it is neurotropic is not right if the madrepore is not neurotropic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Lasso is not a Attilio.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the Lasso is non-parietal.; sent17 -> int2: the fact that the Lasso is parietal is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Lasso is a kind of a Attilio.; __UNKNOWN__