the distemper does not winnow mortality.
sent1: the cholla is non-pentecostal if the distemper is a indispensability and it is a asceticism. sent2: there is something such that that it is not a asceticism and is a heat hold. sent3: the fact that the hornbill is a indispensability or does not winnow mortality or both does not hold if the forum is a asceticism. sent4: there is something such that that it is not a asceticism and it is a brush is wrong. sent5: the cholla is pentecostal and it is a heat. sent6: if something is not a polyhedron and it does not winnow Shaktism the omission is not a Ab. sent7: the cholla is not a indispensability if it is a photalgia and a brush. sent8: that the distemper is not a heat is true if that the cholla winnows mortality and is a indispensability is correct. sent9: if there is something such that it is a asceticism then the distemper is a asceticism. sent10: if the cholla is a indispensability then it is pentecostal. sent11: the distemper winnows mortality if the cholla winnows mortality. sent12: if the distemper does winnow mortality then it is a indispensability. sent13: everything is not a polyhedron. sent14: everything does not winnow Shaktism. sent15: something is a asceticism that is pentecostal if it is not a kind of a heat. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a asceticism and a brush does not hold the distemper is a asceticism. sent17: there is something such that that it is a asceticism and is pentecostal is not correct. sent18: the cholla is a kind of a photalgia and is a brush. sent19: if the omission is not a Ab the fact that that the forum is a brush but not a photalgia is correct is not right. sent20: the distemper is pentecostal. sent21: the fact that the cholla does unpick preseason and it is a kind of a heat hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the distemper winnows mortality.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the distemper is a indispensability.; sent4 & sent16 -> int2: the distemper is a asceticism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the distemper is a indispensability and a asceticism.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the cholla is not pentecostal is true.; sent5 -> int5: the cholla is pentecostal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the distemper winnows mortality is correct.
sent14 -> int7: the pallasite does not winnow Shaktism.; sent13 -> int8: the pallasite is not a kind of a polyhedron.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the pallasite is not a polyhedron and it does not winnow Shaktism.; int9 -> int10: everything is not a polyhedron and it does not winnow Shaktism.; int10 -> int11: the interlock is not a polyhedron and it does not winnow Shaktism.; int11 -> int12: something is not a polyhedron and does not winnow Shaktism.; sent6 & int12 -> int13: that the omission is not a Ab is not incorrect.; sent19 & int13 -> int14: that the forum does brush but it is not a kind of a photalgia is wrong.; sent15 -> int15: if the forum does not heat then it is a kind of a asceticism and it is pentecostal.;
$hypothesis$ = the distemper does not winnow mortality. ; $context$ = sent1: the cholla is non-pentecostal if the distemper is a indispensability and it is a asceticism. sent2: there is something such that that it is not a asceticism and is a heat hold. sent3: the fact that the hornbill is a indispensability or does not winnow mortality or both does not hold if the forum is a asceticism. sent4: there is something such that that it is not a asceticism and it is a brush is wrong. sent5: the cholla is pentecostal and it is a heat. sent6: if something is not a polyhedron and it does not winnow Shaktism the omission is not a Ab. sent7: the cholla is not a indispensability if it is a photalgia and a brush. sent8: that the distemper is not a heat is true if that the cholla winnows mortality and is a indispensability is correct. sent9: if there is something such that it is a asceticism then the distemper is a asceticism. sent10: if the cholla is a indispensability then it is pentecostal. sent11: the distemper winnows mortality if the cholla winnows mortality. sent12: if the distemper does winnow mortality then it is a indispensability. sent13: everything is not a polyhedron. sent14: everything does not winnow Shaktism. sent15: something is a asceticism that is pentecostal if it is not a kind of a heat. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a asceticism and a brush does not hold the distemper is a asceticism. sent17: there is something such that that it is a asceticism and is pentecostal is not correct. sent18: the cholla is a kind of a photalgia and is a brush. sent19: if the omission is not a Ab the fact that that the forum is a brush but not a photalgia is correct is not right. sent20: the distemper is pentecostal. sent21: the fact that the cholla does unpick preseason and it is a kind of a heat hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the distemper winnows mortality.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the distemper is a indispensability.; sent4 & sent16 -> int2: the distemper is a asceticism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the distemper is a indispensability and a asceticism.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the cholla is not pentecostal is true.; sent5 -> int5: the cholla is pentecostal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__