that the usurper is not a velodrome is not false.
sent1: the antidiabetic does not forecast Othello and it is not a perpendicular. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a disrepair that is a kind of a jalousie is wrong. sent3: if the usurper is not a kind of a Polynesian then it is not rimless. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does believe and is not a cowardice is wrong. sent5: that the cloverleaf is not a cowardice and it is not velar is false. sent6: the usurper is rimless if there is something such that the fact that it does believe and it is not a kind of a cowardice is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that it is a launching that is not rimless. sent8: there exists something such that it is rimless and is not a launching. sent9: the usurper is not a kind of a cowardice. sent10: something does crust voyager but it is not an intrigue. sent11: the usurper is a velodrome if it is a launching. sent12: the usurper does not believe if it is not sadistic. sent13: the fact that something is a launching and it is a velodrome does not hold if it is not rimless. sent14: the archangel does not forecast bedded if it does not believe. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a cowardice and it is not velar is wrong then the leucine is not a velodrome. sent16: something is not a kind of a crash if it is not a launching and/or it is not a crash. sent17: if there are rimmed things the usurper is not a launching and/or it is not a kind of a crash. sent18: the castrato is not rimless. sent19: if the fact that the usurper is not omnidirectional hold then that it is not concessive is true. sent20: something is not omnidirectional and it is not a Polynesian if it is not a launching. sent21: there is something such that it is a kind of a fell and does not spring-clean. sent22: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of rimless thing that is not a kind of a velodrome is wrong. sent23: if that something does launch and is a velodrome does not hold then it is not a velodrome.
sent20 -> int1: the usurper is not omnidirectional and it is not Polynesian if it is not a kind of a launching.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the usurper does not launch.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the usurper is not omnidirectional and it is not Polynesian.; int2 -> int3: the usurper is not a kind of a Polynesian.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the usurper is not rimless is not false.; sent4 & sent6 -> int5: the usurper is rimless.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the usurper is a launching.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the usurper is a velodrome is false.
sent23 -> int8: if the fact that the usurper does launch and it is a velodrome is incorrect it is not a velodrome.; sent13 -> int9: if the leucine is not rimless the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a launching that is a velodrome is not incorrect does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the usurper is not a velodrome is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the antidiabetic does not forecast Othello and it is not a perpendicular. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a disrepair that is a kind of a jalousie is wrong. sent3: if the usurper is not a kind of a Polynesian then it is not rimless. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does believe and is not a cowardice is wrong. sent5: that the cloverleaf is not a cowardice and it is not velar is false. sent6: the usurper is rimless if there is something such that the fact that it does believe and it is not a kind of a cowardice is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that it is a launching that is not rimless. sent8: there exists something such that it is rimless and is not a launching. sent9: the usurper is not a kind of a cowardice. sent10: something does crust voyager but it is not an intrigue. sent11: the usurper is a velodrome if it is a launching. sent12: the usurper does not believe if it is not sadistic. sent13: the fact that something is a launching and it is a velodrome does not hold if it is not rimless. sent14: the archangel does not forecast bedded if it does not believe. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a cowardice and it is not velar is wrong then the leucine is not a velodrome. sent16: something is not a kind of a crash if it is not a launching and/or it is not a crash. sent17: if there are rimmed things the usurper is not a launching and/or it is not a kind of a crash. sent18: the castrato is not rimless. sent19: if the fact that the usurper is not omnidirectional hold then that it is not concessive is true. sent20: something is not omnidirectional and it is not a Polynesian if it is not a launching. sent21: there is something such that it is a kind of a fell and does not spring-clean. sent22: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of rimless thing that is not a kind of a velodrome is wrong. sent23: if that something does launch and is a velodrome does not hold then it is not a velodrome. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the usurper is not omnidirectional and it is not Polynesian if it is not a kind of a launching.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the usurper does not launch.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the usurper is not omnidirectional and it is not Polynesian.; int2 -> int3: the usurper is not a kind of a Polynesian.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the usurper is not rimless is not false.; sent4 & sent6 -> int5: the usurper is rimless.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the usurper is a launching.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__