the killing does not occur and/or the baa happens.
sent1: the Minoanness brings about that the LASEK happens and/or the returning does not occur. sent2: the LASEK happens. sent3: if the like does not occur the recoiling does not occur. sent4: if the Minoan does not occur the return and the LASEK occurs. sent5: the clapping bunt and the uncoiling happens. sent6: if the amputation happens or the disguising sophism does not occur or both then the Minoan does not occur. sent7: if the ichorousness does not occur then the fact that the barricading bellwort and/or the tattooing happens is not correct. sent8: the non-ichorousness and the non-modalness happens if the anisogameticness does not occur. sent9: the amputation occurs or the disguising sophism does not occur or both. sent10: that the uncoiling occurs and the one-off happens triggers that the returning does not occur. sent11: if the uncoiling does not occur then the fact that both the one-off and the clapping bunt occurs does not hold. sent12: the killing does not occur if the one-off does not occur. sent13: that the Minoanness does not occur is brought about by that the amputation happens. sent14: the fact that either the killing does not occur or the baa occurs or both is not right if the clapping bunt does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the barricading bellwort and/or the tattooing occurs is wrong then the amputation does not occur.
sent5 -> int1: the uncoiling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the one-off occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the uncoiling and the one-off happens.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the return does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int4: that the Minoanness does not occur hold.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the return happens and the LASEK happens.; int5 -> int6: the returning happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the one-off does not occur.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the killing does not occur.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the killing does not occur or the baa happens or both is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the killing does not occur and/or the baa happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the Minoanness brings about that the LASEK happens and/or the returning does not occur. sent2: the LASEK happens. sent3: if the like does not occur the recoiling does not occur. sent4: if the Minoan does not occur the return and the LASEK occurs. sent5: the clapping bunt and the uncoiling happens. sent6: if the amputation happens or the disguising sophism does not occur or both then the Minoan does not occur. sent7: if the ichorousness does not occur then the fact that the barricading bellwort and/or the tattooing happens is not correct. sent8: the non-ichorousness and the non-modalness happens if the anisogameticness does not occur. sent9: the amputation occurs or the disguising sophism does not occur or both. sent10: that the uncoiling occurs and the one-off happens triggers that the returning does not occur. sent11: if the uncoiling does not occur then the fact that both the one-off and the clapping bunt occurs does not hold. sent12: the killing does not occur if the one-off does not occur. sent13: that the Minoanness does not occur is brought about by that the amputation happens. sent14: the fact that either the killing does not occur or the baa occurs or both is not right if the clapping bunt does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the barricading bellwort and/or the tattooing occurs is wrong then the amputation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the uncoiling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the one-off occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the uncoiling and the one-off happens.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the return does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int4: that the Minoanness does not occur hold.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the return happens and the LASEK happens.; int5 -> int6: the returning happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the one-off does not occur.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the killing does not occur.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__