the fact that the powdering money does not occur and the deferral does not occur is not correct.
sent1: the rattiness does not occur. sent2: the mitralness or that the diversification occurs or both prevents that the fascist occurs. sent3: if the fact that the augmentation does not occur and the cannibalisticness does not occur is not right then the powdering money does not occur. sent4: that the diversification occurs is caused by that the augmentation does not occur and the cannibalisticness does not occur. sent5: the peatiness happens and the fascist happens if the affixalness does not occur. sent6: the deferral does not occur if that that not the discus but the deferral happens is not wrong does not hold. sent7: if the rattiness does not occur then the fact that the discus does not occur and the deferral happens does not hold. sent8: the affixalness does not occur and the easter does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the augmentation does not occur and the cannibalisticness does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the diversification happens is true.; int1 -> int2: either the mitralness or the diversification or both occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fascist does not occur.; sent8 -> int4: the affixalness does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the peatiness happens and the fascistness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the fascistness happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the augmentation does not occur and the cannibalisticness does not occur is not right.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the powdering money does not occur.; sent7 & sent1 -> int10: the fact that the discus does not occur but the deferral occurs does not hold.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the deferral does not occur.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the powdering money does not occur and the deferral does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the rattiness does not occur. sent2: the mitralness or that the diversification occurs or both prevents that the fascist occurs. sent3: if the fact that the augmentation does not occur and the cannibalisticness does not occur is not right then the powdering money does not occur. sent4: that the diversification occurs is caused by that the augmentation does not occur and the cannibalisticness does not occur. sent5: the peatiness happens and the fascist happens if the affixalness does not occur. sent6: the deferral does not occur if that that not the discus but the deferral happens is not wrong does not hold. sent7: if the rattiness does not occur then the fact that the discus does not occur and the deferral happens does not hold. sent8: the affixalness does not occur and the easter does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the augmentation does not occur and the cannibalisticness does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the diversification happens is true.; int1 -> int2: either the mitralness or the diversification or both occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fascist does not occur.; sent8 -> int4: the affixalness does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the peatiness happens and the fascistness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the fascistness happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: that the augmentation does not occur and the cannibalisticness does not occur is not right.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the powdering money does not occur.; sent7 & sent1 -> int10: the fact that the discus does not occur but the deferral occurs does not hold.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the deferral does not occur.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__