there exists something such that if it is not Lusitanian that it either is not unsupportive or is a Cicero or both is wrong.
sent1: if something is not a Oniscidae that it is not unapologetic or it weaves vara or both is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a principalship then the fact that it is either analphabetic or a paralytic or both does not hold. sent3: if the Nobelist is not Lusitanian it is not unsupportive or it is a Cicero or both. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a hypostatization is not incorrect that it does cozen niceness and/or is a kind of a principalship is not right. sent5: there is something such that if it is not Lusitanian then the fact that it is not unsupportive and/or is a kind of a Cicero is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the Nobelist either is not a coalition or is chelicerous or both does not hold if it is not unsupportive. sent7: the fact that something is not unsupportive or it is a Cicero or both is false if it is not Lusitanian. sent8: if something is not Lusitanian then it is not unsupportive or it is a Cicero or both. sent9: there exists something such that if it is Lusitanian the fact that either it is not unsupportive or it is a kind of a Cicero or both is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is not Huxleyan either it does not butt calendar or it is a kind of a principalship or both. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not Lusitanian the fact that it is not a Cicero is not incorrect. sent12: if something is not Lusitanian that it is unsupportive and/or it is a Cicero does not hold. sent13: the Nobelist is not a kind of a Cicero if it is not rhizoidal. sent14: if the Nobelist does not butt Galway then it is not unsupportive and/or weaves Godard. sent15: the fact that something is not glossopharyngeal and/or is chelicerous is wrong if it is not nonsurgical. sent16: that the Nobelist is not unsupportive or a Cicero or both is false if it is Lusitanian. sent17: that something either is not unreliable or is sublittoral or both is wrong if it does cozen unfavorableness.
sent7 -> int1: if the Nobelist is not Lusitanian then the fact that it is not unsupportive or it is a Cicero or both does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not Lusitanian that it either is not unsupportive or is a Cicero or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a Oniscidae that it is not unapologetic or it weaves vara or both is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a principalship then the fact that it is either analphabetic or a paralytic or both does not hold. sent3: if the Nobelist is not Lusitanian it is not unsupportive or it is a Cicero or both. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a hypostatization is not incorrect that it does cozen niceness and/or is a kind of a principalship is not right. sent5: there is something such that if it is not Lusitanian then the fact that it is not unsupportive and/or is a kind of a Cicero is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the Nobelist either is not a coalition or is chelicerous or both does not hold if it is not unsupportive. sent7: the fact that something is not unsupportive or it is a Cicero or both is false if it is not Lusitanian. sent8: if something is not Lusitanian then it is not unsupportive or it is a Cicero or both. sent9: there exists something such that if it is Lusitanian the fact that either it is not unsupportive or it is a kind of a Cicero or both is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is not Huxleyan either it does not butt calendar or it is a kind of a principalship or both. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not Lusitanian the fact that it is not a Cicero is not incorrect. sent12: if something is not Lusitanian that it is unsupportive and/or it is a Cicero does not hold. sent13: the Nobelist is not a kind of a Cicero if it is not rhizoidal. sent14: if the Nobelist does not butt Galway then it is not unsupportive and/or weaves Godard. sent15: the fact that something is not glossopharyngeal and/or is chelicerous is wrong if it is not nonsurgical. sent16: that the Nobelist is not unsupportive or a Cicero or both is false if it is Lusitanian. sent17: that something either is not unreliable or is sublittoral or both is wrong if it does cozen unfavorableness. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the Nobelist is not Lusitanian then the fact that it is not unsupportive or it is a Cicero or both does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__