the fact that the wallow prevents the non-industrialness is incorrect.
sent1: the fertilization does not occur if the calligraphicness happens. sent2: the drippings does not occur. sent3: the benignantness prevents the non-calyptrateness. sent4: the weapon occurs. sent5: if the wallowing does not occur that the calyptrateness but not the electroencephalographicness happens is wrong. sent6: if the nightwork does not occur the extirpation does not occur and the leaking does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the benignantness does not occur but the approbating mastic happens does not hold then the maxillariness does not occur. sent8: the bombshell happens. sent9: if the extirpation does not occur then the calligraphicness and the underquoting peek occurs. sent10: the approbating Cairo happens and the uplift occurs. sent11: that the industrialness does not occur is prevented by that the electroencephalographicness does not occur. sent12: the competition occurs. sent13: the benignantness and the approbating mastic occurs. sent14: that the Mark happens leads to the underquoting taste. sent15: the approbating mastic happens. sent16: that the electroencephalographicness happens is prevented by that the calyptrateness occurs and the wallowing occurs. sent17: the wallow does not occur but the industrialness occurs if the fertilization does not occur.
sent13 -> int1: the benignantness occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the calyptrateness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wallowing happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the calyptrateness happens and the wallow occurs.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the electroencephalographicness does not occur.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the industrialness occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the maxillariness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the wallow prevents the non-industrialness is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fertilization does not occur if the calligraphicness happens. sent2: the drippings does not occur. sent3: the benignantness prevents the non-calyptrateness. sent4: the weapon occurs. sent5: if the wallowing does not occur that the calyptrateness but not the electroencephalographicness happens is wrong. sent6: if the nightwork does not occur the extirpation does not occur and the leaking does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the benignantness does not occur but the approbating mastic happens does not hold then the maxillariness does not occur. sent8: the bombshell happens. sent9: if the extirpation does not occur then the calligraphicness and the underquoting peek occurs. sent10: the approbating Cairo happens and the uplift occurs. sent11: that the industrialness does not occur is prevented by that the electroencephalographicness does not occur. sent12: the competition occurs. sent13: the benignantness and the approbating mastic occurs. sent14: that the Mark happens leads to the underquoting taste. sent15: the approbating mastic happens. sent16: that the electroencephalographicness happens is prevented by that the calyptrateness occurs and the wallowing occurs. sent17: the wallow does not occur but the industrialness occurs if the fertilization does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the benignantness occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the calyptrateness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wallowing happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the calyptrateness happens and the wallow occurs.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the electroencephalographicness does not occur.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the industrialness occurs.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__