that the perinasalness does not occur and the punctuation does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the aping porcupines occurs if the callosotomy occurs. sent2: the industrialization does not occur. sent3: the aping transvestism does not occur if the squawking gook happens. sent4: that the topness does not occur but the headlock happens is false if the aping transvestism does not occur. sent5: that the perinasalness does not occur and the punctuation does not occur is caused by the non-extraterritorialness. sent6: the non-cataclinalness results in that the treating hourglass occurs and the blocking does not occur. sent7: if the squawking plum does not occur the contour does not occur. sent8: that the olfactoriness occurs and the intimidation occurs is caused by the non-cytoarchitecturalness. sent9: if both the consummation and the extraterritorialness happens then the preemption does not occur. sent10: that the perinasalness does not occur and the punctuation does not occur is false if the callosotomy does not occur. sent11: the aping porcupines does not occur and/or the extraterritorialness happens if the consummation does not occur. sent12: the nonreturnableness happens. sent13: the fact that that both the aping expressionist and the non-antagonisticness occurs does not hold is not false if the treating poncho does not occur. sent14: that the junket does not occur leads to that the contour and the treating indomethacin occurs. sent15: the onrush does not occur. sent16: if the gallantry does not occur and the olfactoriness happens then the squawking gook occurs. sent17: if that the non-topness and the headlock occurs is wrong then the headlock does not occur. sent18: the cytoarchitecturalness is prevented by that the treating hourglass occurs and the blocking does not occur. sent19: that the contouring does not occur leads to that the preemption and the treating cowrie occurs. sent20: the squawking plum does not occur. sent21: if the fact that the aping expressionist occurs but the antagonisticness does not occur is incorrect the gallantry does not occur. sent22: if the aping porcupines occurs the consummation occurs. sent23: if the treating cowrie does not occur then the preemption does not occur and the consummation does not occur. sent24: that the junket does not occur and the technologicalness occurs is brought about by that the headlock does not occur. sent25: the callosotomy occurs and the Britannicness happens. sent26: the catholicness occurs. sent27: the fact that if the Britannicness does not occur then the callosotomy happens and the cheliferousness occurs is not false. sent28: that the treating poncho does not occur is right.
sent25 -> int1: the callosotomy happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the aping porcupines occurs.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the consummation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extraterritorialness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the consummation happens and the extraterritorialness occurs.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the preemption does not occur.; sent7 & sent20 -> int6: the contour does not occur.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the preemption happens and the treating cowrie occurs.; int7 -> int8: the preemption happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the extraterritorialness does not occur.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the cheliferousness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the perinasalness does not occur and the punctuation does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the aping porcupines occurs if the callosotomy occurs. sent2: the industrialization does not occur. sent3: the aping transvestism does not occur if the squawking gook happens. sent4: that the topness does not occur but the headlock happens is false if the aping transvestism does not occur. sent5: that the perinasalness does not occur and the punctuation does not occur is caused by the non-extraterritorialness. sent6: the non-cataclinalness results in that the treating hourglass occurs and the blocking does not occur. sent7: if the squawking plum does not occur the contour does not occur. sent8: that the olfactoriness occurs and the intimidation occurs is caused by the non-cytoarchitecturalness. sent9: if both the consummation and the extraterritorialness happens then the preemption does not occur. sent10: that the perinasalness does not occur and the punctuation does not occur is false if the callosotomy does not occur. sent11: the aping porcupines does not occur and/or the extraterritorialness happens if the consummation does not occur. sent12: the nonreturnableness happens. sent13: the fact that that both the aping expressionist and the non-antagonisticness occurs does not hold is not false if the treating poncho does not occur. sent14: that the junket does not occur leads to that the contour and the treating indomethacin occurs. sent15: the onrush does not occur. sent16: if the gallantry does not occur and the olfactoriness happens then the squawking gook occurs. sent17: if that the non-topness and the headlock occurs is wrong then the headlock does not occur. sent18: the cytoarchitecturalness is prevented by that the treating hourglass occurs and the blocking does not occur. sent19: that the contouring does not occur leads to that the preemption and the treating cowrie occurs. sent20: the squawking plum does not occur. sent21: if the fact that the aping expressionist occurs but the antagonisticness does not occur is incorrect the gallantry does not occur. sent22: if the aping porcupines occurs the consummation occurs. sent23: if the treating cowrie does not occur then the preemption does not occur and the consummation does not occur. sent24: that the junket does not occur and the technologicalness occurs is brought about by that the headlock does not occur. sent25: the callosotomy occurs and the Britannicness happens. sent26: the catholicness occurs. sent27: the fact that if the Britannicness does not occur then the callosotomy happens and the cheliferousness occurs is not false. sent28: that the treating poncho does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 -> int1: the callosotomy happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the aping porcupines occurs.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the consummation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extraterritorialness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the consummation happens and the extraterritorialness occurs.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the preemption does not occur.; sent7 & sent20 -> int6: the contour does not occur.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the preemption happens and the treating cowrie occurs.; int7 -> int8: the preemption happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the extraterritorialness does not occur.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__