that there exists something such that it is a hazard and it is maxillofacial is not true.
sent1: the fact that the gun is not platonic is correct. sent2: the lignite is a hazard if there is something such that it does freckle conciseness. sent3: that something is a recombinant is not false. sent4: the fact that either the Saudi is a nog or it is a kind of a internalization or both is incorrect. sent5: that the Saudi is archegonial and/or it is a internalization is incorrect. sent6: the Augustinian freckles conciseness. sent7: the cabstand is a internalization. sent8: if the Saudi is not a Cortland and it is not a kind of a hyoid then the lignite is maxillofacial. sent9: the Augustinian is not a internalization. sent10: something is a internalization. sent11: that the steak is not a hazard is true. sent12: if the Saudi is a hazard the diamagnetism is a kind of a hazard. sent13: the lignite is not maxillofacial if the Augustinian is maxillofacial. sent14: if that the fact that something is vestibular a rout is correct is not right it does not rout. sent15: the Saudi is not hyoid. sent16: the fact that the gun is vestibular and it does rout does not hold if there exists something such that it is recombinant. sent17: the horseback is not a kind of a bleu if something is a Mullus. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a hyoid that is a Cortland is not right the Saudi is a hazard. sent19: The conciseness freckles Augustinian. sent20: if the lignite is not maxillofacial the fact that it is a kind of a hyoid and is a kind of a Cortland is not right. sent21: that the Saudi is not a internalization is not incorrect. sent22: the Saudi is not a Cortland if that it is a nog and/or a internalization is wrong. sent23: if something that does not rout is not platonic it is a Mullus.
sent22 & sent4 -> int1: the Saudi is not a Cortland.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the Saudi is not a Cortland and is not hyoid.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the lignite is maxillofacial.; sent6 -> int4: there is something such that it does freckle conciseness.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the lignite is a hazard.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the lignite is a hazard and it is maxillofacial.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the diamagnetism is a hazard.
sent23 -> int7: if the gun is not a rout and not platonic it is a Mullus.; sent14 -> int8: if the fact that the gun is vestibular and it routs is not right it is not a kind of a routs.; sent3 & sent16 -> int9: that the gun is vestibular and is a kind of a rout is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the gun does not rout.; int10 & sent1 -> int11: the gun does not rout and is not platonic.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the gun is a Mullus.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is a Mullus.; int13 & sent17 -> int14: the horseback is not a bleu.; int14 -> int15: something is not a bleu.;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that it is a hazard and it is maxillofacial is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gun is not platonic is correct. sent2: the lignite is a hazard if there is something such that it does freckle conciseness. sent3: that something is a recombinant is not false. sent4: the fact that either the Saudi is a nog or it is a kind of a internalization or both is incorrect. sent5: that the Saudi is archegonial and/or it is a internalization is incorrect. sent6: the Augustinian freckles conciseness. sent7: the cabstand is a internalization. sent8: if the Saudi is not a Cortland and it is not a kind of a hyoid then the lignite is maxillofacial. sent9: the Augustinian is not a internalization. sent10: something is a internalization. sent11: that the steak is not a hazard is true. sent12: if the Saudi is a hazard the diamagnetism is a kind of a hazard. sent13: the lignite is not maxillofacial if the Augustinian is maxillofacial. sent14: if that the fact that something is vestibular a rout is correct is not right it does not rout. sent15: the Saudi is not hyoid. sent16: the fact that the gun is vestibular and it does rout does not hold if there exists something such that it is recombinant. sent17: the horseback is not a kind of a bleu if something is a Mullus. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a hyoid that is a Cortland is not right the Saudi is a hazard. sent19: The conciseness freckles Augustinian. sent20: if the lignite is not maxillofacial the fact that it is a kind of a hyoid and is a kind of a Cortland is not right. sent21: that the Saudi is not a internalization is not incorrect. sent22: the Saudi is not a Cortland if that it is a nog and/or a internalization is wrong. sent23: if something that does not rout is not platonic it is a Mullus. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent4 -> int1: the Saudi is not a Cortland.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the Saudi is not a Cortland and is not hyoid.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the lignite is maxillofacial.; sent6 -> int4: there is something such that it does freckle conciseness.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the lignite is a hazard.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the lignite is a hazard and it is maxillofacial.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__