there is something such that if it is incontestable then that it does lengthen and it does not stage eudemon is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is volumetric then that it does variegate and it does not lather mahogany is not right. sent2: if something is incontestable it lengthens and it does not stage eudemon. sent3: there is something such that if it is incontestable it lengthens and it does not stage eudemon. sent4: that something does lengthen and does stage eudemon is not right if it is incontestable. sent5: that something is prismatic and is not a refraction does not hold if it does eviscerate hydromancer. sent6: if the mahogany lengthens then that it eviscerates Equus and it is a refraction does not hold. sent7: if the mahogany is incontestable it lengthens and does not stage eudemon.
if the mahogany does eviscerate hydromancer then the fact that it is prismatic and it is not a refraction is not true.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is incontestable then that it does lengthen and it does not stage eudemon is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is volumetric then that it does variegate and it does not lather mahogany is not right. sent2: if something is incontestable it lengthens and it does not stage eudemon. sent3: there is something such that if it is incontestable it lengthens and it does not stage eudemon. sent4: that something does lengthen and does stage eudemon is not right if it is incontestable. sent5: that something is prismatic and is not a refraction does not hold if it does eviscerate hydromancer. sent6: if the mahogany lengthens then that it eviscerates Equus and it is a refraction does not hold. sent7: if the mahogany is incontestable it lengthens and does not stage eudemon. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__