the blastodermaticness occurs.
sent1: the abrading happens if the Abkhazness happens. sent2: if the coking does not occur then the fact that the banding Skylab but not the banding saltine happens does not hold. sent3: if the premeditating inconsideration happens the blastodermaticness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that not the Abkhazness but the medicine occurs is incorrect the abrading happens. sent5: the coke does not occur if that the ensnaring does not occur and the stabilization does not occur is not correct. sent6: the blastodermaticness occurs if the premeditating inconsideration does not occur and the abrading does not occur. sent7: the fact that both the fictionalization and the toroidalness occurs does not hold if the fairing does not occur. sent8: if that the fact that the fictionalization occurs and the toroidalness occurs is not incorrect is false the toroidalness does not occur. sent9: that the banding Skylab occurs is caused by that the nonarborealness does not occur. sent10: that both the non-Abkhazness and the medicine happens is false if the fact that the premeditating inconsideration does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: that the ensnaring does not occur and the stabilization does not occur is not true if the fact that the toroidalness does not occur is right. sent12: the fact that that the abrading occurs prevents the nonarborealness is correct. sent13: the banding saltine does not occur. sent14: the banding Skylab does not occur and the banding saltine does not occur. sent15: the fact that both the Abkhaz and the medicine occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the premeditating inconsideration does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-Abkhazness and the medicine occurs is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the abrading happens.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the nonarborealness does not occur.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the banding Skylab occurs.; sent14 -> int5: the banding Skylab does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the premeditating inconsideration occurs is not false.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the blastodermaticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the blastodermaticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the abrading happens if the Abkhazness happens. sent2: if the coking does not occur then the fact that the banding Skylab but not the banding saltine happens does not hold. sent3: if the premeditating inconsideration happens the blastodermaticness does not occur. sent4: if the fact that not the Abkhazness but the medicine occurs is incorrect the abrading happens. sent5: the coke does not occur if that the ensnaring does not occur and the stabilization does not occur is not correct. sent6: the blastodermaticness occurs if the premeditating inconsideration does not occur and the abrading does not occur. sent7: the fact that both the fictionalization and the toroidalness occurs does not hold if the fairing does not occur. sent8: if that the fact that the fictionalization occurs and the toroidalness occurs is not incorrect is false the toroidalness does not occur. sent9: that the banding Skylab occurs is caused by that the nonarborealness does not occur. sent10: that both the non-Abkhazness and the medicine happens is false if the fact that the premeditating inconsideration does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: that the ensnaring does not occur and the stabilization does not occur is not true if the fact that the toroidalness does not occur is right. sent12: the fact that that the abrading occurs prevents the nonarborealness is correct. sent13: the banding saltine does not occur. sent14: the banding Skylab does not occur and the banding saltine does not occur. sent15: the fact that both the Abkhaz and the medicine occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the premeditating inconsideration does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-Abkhazness and the medicine occurs is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the abrading happens.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the nonarborealness does not occur.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the banding Skylab occurs.; sent14 -> int5: the banding Skylab does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the premeditating inconsideration occurs is not false.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__