that the gasket is not unsent and is not a monosaccharide is false.
sent1: the gasket is both not unsent and not a monosaccharide if the fact that the puffball does not bawl Toltec is not wrong. sent2: something is a dead if it is a beige. sent3: if something does not bawl Toltec the fact that it is spatiotemporal and it is superjacent is not correct. sent4: if the fact that that the gasket is both not dead and a George is not correct is not false it does not bawl Toltec. sent5: the sidecar is a beige if something is not spatiotemporal but it is a kind of a pellet. sent6: if the sidecar is not a George it is not a dead. sent7: there exists something such that it is spatiotemporal a pellet. sent8: if the puffball is not superjacent then the fact that that the sidecar does not bawl Toltec but it is a George is wrong hold. sent9: the fact that something is not dead is not wrong if that it does not bawl Toltec and is a George is not right. sent10: if the gasket is not spatiotemporal and it is not unsent the cat's-ear is not a kind of a monosaccharide. sent11: the cat's-ear is non-spatiotemporal thing that is a kind of a pellet. sent12: the fact that the abomasum does not bawl Toltec is not wrong. sent13: the puffball is both a George and dead if the sidecar is not a kind of a beige. sent14: if the gasket is not unsent and is not a kind of a monosaccharide the puffball is not superjacent.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gasket is not unsent and it is not a monosaccharide.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the puffball is not superjacent.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the sidecar does not bawl Toltec and is a kind of a George is not true.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the sidecar does not bawl Toltec but it is a George is incorrect it is not dead.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sidecar is not a dead.; sent2 -> int5: the sidecar is a dead if it is a beige.; sent11 -> int6: there is something such that it is not spatiotemporal and it is a pellet.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the sidecar is a beige.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the sidecar is a dead.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the puffball is not spatiotemporal.
sent3 -> int10: the fact that the gasket is spatiotemporal and it is superjacent is not right if it does not bawl Toltec.;
$hypothesis$ = that the gasket is not unsent and is not a monosaccharide is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the gasket is both not unsent and not a monosaccharide if the fact that the puffball does not bawl Toltec is not wrong. sent2: something is a dead if it is a beige. sent3: if something does not bawl Toltec the fact that it is spatiotemporal and it is superjacent is not correct. sent4: if the fact that that the gasket is both not dead and a George is not correct is not false it does not bawl Toltec. sent5: the sidecar is a beige if something is not spatiotemporal but it is a kind of a pellet. sent6: if the sidecar is not a George it is not a dead. sent7: there exists something such that it is spatiotemporal a pellet. sent8: if the puffball is not superjacent then the fact that that the sidecar does not bawl Toltec but it is a George is wrong hold. sent9: the fact that something is not dead is not wrong if that it does not bawl Toltec and is a George is not right. sent10: if the gasket is not spatiotemporal and it is not unsent the cat's-ear is not a kind of a monosaccharide. sent11: the cat's-ear is non-spatiotemporal thing that is a kind of a pellet. sent12: the fact that the abomasum does not bawl Toltec is not wrong. sent13: the puffball is both a George and dead if the sidecar is not a kind of a beige. sent14: if the gasket is not unsent and is not a kind of a monosaccharide the puffball is not superjacent. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gasket is not unsent and it is not a monosaccharide.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the puffball is not superjacent.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the sidecar does not bawl Toltec and is a kind of a George is not true.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the sidecar does not bawl Toltec but it is a George is incorrect it is not dead.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sidecar is not a dead.; sent2 -> int5: the sidecar is a dead if it is a beige.; sent11 -> int6: there is something such that it is not spatiotemporal and it is a pellet.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the sidecar is a beige.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the sidecar is a dead.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__