the fact that the pigfish does maintain Brachycome and it is a technicality is correct.
sent1: if the pigfish is a night-line then the fact that the fact that the firkin is not non-viricidal and is not a technicality is not true is correct. sent2: the firkin is not an ionization. sent3: the fact that the beater detribalizes robber and it is a kind of a shipyard hold. sent4: the fact that the ricer is apocryphal and does not maintain Brachycome is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the protist is a kind of a calf but it is not a night-line is not true. sent6: the pigfish is a kind of a night-line. sent7: if the firkin is not an ionization it does not offer. sent8: that something maintains Brachycome and it is a technicality is not correct if it is not a kind of a night-line. sent9: the pigfish is a kind of a technicality if something is a calf. sent10: the pigfish is a kind of a technicality. sent11: if something is a tarnish it is a calf and is not a night-line. sent12: the fact that the duffel is viricidal a marbles is false. sent13: the fact that something does not tighten hummus and it is not disreputable does not hold if it is not an offering. sent14: if the fact that the fact that the duffel is viricidal but it does not marble does not hold hold then the protist is a calf. sent15: if the duffel is a marbles the protist is a calf. sent16: the fact that the duffel is viricidal but it does not marble is not true if the firkin is a night-line. sent17: if the firkin is a kind of a night-line the fact that the duffel is viricidal and it does marble is wrong. sent18: the pigfish does maintain Brachycome and it is a technicality if there is something such that it is a calf. sent19: if something is viricidal then the duffel does maintain Brachycome and it is a kind of a technicality.
that the pigfish maintains Brachycome and is a technicality is false.
sent8 -> int1: if the pigfish is not a kind of a night-line the fact that it does maintain Brachycome and is a technicality is incorrect.; sent11 -> int2: the pigfish is a calf that is not a night-line if it is a tarnish.; sent13 -> int3: that that the firkin does not tighten hummus and it is not disreputable is not true is not false if it is not an offering.; sent7 & sent2 -> int4: the firkin is not an offering.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the firkin does not tighten hummus and is not disreputable is not right.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does not tighten hummus and is not disreputable hold is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pigfish does maintain Brachycome and it is a technicality is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pigfish is a night-line then the fact that the fact that the firkin is not non-viricidal and is not a technicality is not true is correct. sent2: the firkin is not an ionization. sent3: the fact that the beater detribalizes robber and it is a kind of a shipyard hold. sent4: the fact that the ricer is apocryphal and does not maintain Brachycome is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the protist is a kind of a calf but it is not a night-line is not true. sent6: the pigfish is a kind of a night-line. sent7: if the firkin is not an ionization it does not offer. sent8: that something maintains Brachycome and it is a technicality is not correct if it is not a kind of a night-line. sent9: the pigfish is a kind of a technicality if something is a calf. sent10: the pigfish is a kind of a technicality. sent11: if something is a tarnish it is a calf and is not a night-line. sent12: the fact that the duffel is viricidal a marbles is false. sent13: the fact that something does not tighten hummus and it is not disreputable does not hold if it is not an offering. sent14: if the fact that the fact that the duffel is viricidal but it does not marble does not hold hold then the protist is a calf. sent15: if the duffel is a marbles the protist is a calf. sent16: the fact that the duffel is viricidal but it does not marble is not true if the firkin is a night-line. sent17: if the firkin is a kind of a night-line the fact that the duffel is viricidal and it does marble is wrong. sent18: the pigfish does maintain Brachycome and it is a technicality if there is something such that it is a calf. sent19: if something is viricidal then the duffel does maintain Brachycome and it is a kind of a technicality. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__