the whitethorn is not bryophytic.
sent1: the fact that the cabalist is not crustaceous and it is not a kind of a Turkish is not right if it is analphabetic. sent2: the cabalist is analphabetic. sent3: the maceration does not redecorate Warwick if there exists something such that it is non-diffuse. sent4: there exists something such that it does diffuse and it is diadromous. sent5: if the fact that that the cabalist is both not crustaceous and not a Turkish is not right is correct it is not diffusing. sent6: if the cabalist is not diffusing and not a honey the peculiarity is not diffusing. sent7: something is diadromous but it does not redecorate Marquand if it does not diffuse. sent8: that something is not a munj and is not bryophytic does not hold if it does not diffuse. sent9: if there is something such that that it is not a miniaturist and it is a Twinkie is wrong the cabalist is not a honey. sent10: the maceration is diadromous. sent11: if the whitethorn is diffuse and it is a munj then it is not bryophytic. sent12: that something is not a kind of a munj but it is bryophytic is wrong if it is diadromous. sent13: if the maceration is diadromous but it does not redecorate Marquand then the fact that the whitethorn does not diffuse is correct. sent14: the maceration does not diffuse if the watchband is diffuse thing that is a honey. sent15: the fact that the whitethorn is a munj is not wrong if that the maceration is diadromous is correct. sent16: that the camshaft does tincture nandrolone and it is diachronic does not hold. sent17: the fact that the lionet is not a kind of a miniaturist but it is a Twinkie is not right. sent18: if the peculiarity is a miniaturist the watchband does honey. sent19: the watchband is diadromous and redecorates Marquand if the peculiarity is not diffusing.
sent16 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it tinctures nandrolone and it is diachronic is not correct.; sent15 & sent10 -> int2: the whitethorn is a munj.;
the whitethorn is bryophytic.
sent8 -> int3: if the whitethorn is non-diffuse then that it is not a munj and it is not bryophytic is not right.; sent7 -> int4: if the maceration is not diffusing it is diadromous thing that does not redecorate Marquand.;
$hypothesis$ = the whitethorn is not bryophytic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cabalist is not crustaceous and it is not a kind of a Turkish is not right if it is analphabetic. sent2: the cabalist is analphabetic. sent3: the maceration does not redecorate Warwick if there exists something such that it is non-diffuse. sent4: there exists something such that it does diffuse and it is diadromous. sent5: if the fact that that the cabalist is both not crustaceous and not a Turkish is not right is correct it is not diffusing. sent6: if the cabalist is not diffusing and not a honey the peculiarity is not diffusing. sent7: something is diadromous but it does not redecorate Marquand if it does not diffuse. sent8: that something is not a munj and is not bryophytic does not hold if it does not diffuse. sent9: if there is something such that that it is not a miniaturist and it is a Twinkie is wrong the cabalist is not a honey. sent10: the maceration is diadromous. sent11: if the whitethorn is diffuse and it is a munj then it is not bryophytic. sent12: that something is not a kind of a munj but it is bryophytic is wrong if it is diadromous. sent13: if the maceration is diadromous but it does not redecorate Marquand then the fact that the whitethorn does not diffuse is correct. sent14: the maceration does not diffuse if the watchband is diffuse thing that is a honey. sent15: the fact that the whitethorn is a munj is not wrong if that the maceration is diadromous is correct. sent16: that the camshaft does tincture nandrolone and it is diachronic does not hold. sent17: the fact that the lionet is not a kind of a miniaturist but it is a Twinkie is not right. sent18: if the peculiarity is a miniaturist the watchband does honey. sent19: the watchband is diadromous and redecorates Marquand if the peculiarity is not diffusing. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it tinctures nandrolone and it is diachronic is not correct.; sent15 & sent10 -> int2: the whitethorn is a munj.; __UNKNOWN__