the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a dissilience then that it is not a kind of a passage and does not debrief Irishwoman is not correct does not hold.
sent1: the fact that something is not a Telosporidia and it is not preprandial does not hold if it is not a chantry. sent2: there is something such that if it does not chomp the fact that it is not a Indonesian and it does not Latinize is not correct. sent3: if the framboise is not a dissilience then the fact that it is a kind of a passage that does not debrief Irishwoman is not true. sent4: if the framboise is not a dissilience that it is not a passage and it does not debrief Irishwoman is wrong. sent5: that the framboise is not a passage and does not debrief Irishwoman is not true if it is a dissilience.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the Irishwoman is not a Telosporidia but non-preprandial is not right if it is not a kind of a chantry.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a dissilience then that it is not a kind of a passage and does not debrief Irishwoman is not correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a Telosporidia and it is not preprandial does not hold if it is not a chantry. sent2: there is something such that if it does not chomp the fact that it is not a Indonesian and it does not Latinize is not correct. sent3: if the framboise is not a dissilience then the fact that it is a kind of a passage that does not debrief Irishwoman is not true. sent4: if the framboise is not a dissilience that it is not a passage and it does not debrief Irishwoman is wrong. sent5: that the framboise is not a passage and does not debrief Irishwoman is not true if it is a dissilience. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__