there exists something such that if the fact that it does not drink Perejil is not incorrect that either it is a mettlesomeness or it warms milo or both is incorrect.
sent1: if the minicar does not warm milo the fact that it is unsatisfactory or impends or both does not hold. sent2: if the Silex is not dysgenic then that it is a tombac and/or does warm milo is not true. sent3: there exists something such that if it drinks Perejil then the fact that it is a mettlesomeness and/or it does warm milo is false. sent4: that either the milo does carbonate ramona or it is a Epirus or both does not hold if it is not a mettlesomeness. sent5: if the minicar does not drink Perejil then that either it is a mettlesomeness or it does warm milo or both is not true. sent6: that something drinks chutzpanik and/or does warm guilloche is false if it does not drink Silex. sent7: the minicar is a mettlesomeness and/or warms milo if it does not drink Perejil. sent8: there is something such that if it does not drink Perejil it is not a mettlesomeness. sent9: there exists something such that if that it does not drink Perejil hold then it is a kind of a mettlesomeness or it warms milo or both. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a testiness then the fact that either it does warm oarfish or it is a Cuminum or both does not hold. sent11: that either the oarfish does drink seismogram or it is horse-drawn or both is not correct if it is not nascent. sent12: the fact that the minicar is papery or is mucinous or both is false if it does not warm milo. sent13: if the minicar does not drink Perejil then it is not a mettlesomeness. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not drink Perejil then the fact that it does not warm milo is not wrong. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not hymenopterous then either it is a kind of a Muslim or it drinks Silex or both. sent16: there exists something such that if it does not drink seismogram then that it warns or it is a kind of a Delichon or both is not right. sent17: that something is an effectiveness or it buckrams or both is wrong if it is not a timbrel. sent18: that the minicar is a kind of a mettlesomeness and/or it warms milo is not correct if it drinks Perejil. sent19: if that the belting does not drink mouton is not wrong then that it is Britannic and/or it begs does not hold.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
that there exists something such that if it does not drink Silex then that it drinks chutzpanik and/or does warm guilloche is false is true.
sent6 -> int1: that the novillero drinks chutzpanik or it does warm guilloche or both is false if it does not drink Silex.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not drink Perejil is not incorrect that either it is a mettlesomeness or it warms milo or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the minicar does not warm milo the fact that it is unsatisfactory or impends or both does not hold. sent2: if the Silex is not dysgenic then that it is a tombac and/or does warm milo is not true. sent3: there exists something such that if it drinks Perejil then the fact that it is a mettlesomeness and/or it does warm milo is false. sent4: that either the milo does carbonate ramona or it is a Epirus or both does not hold if it is not a mettlesomeness. sent5: if the minicar does not drink Perejil then that either it is a mettlesomeness or it does warm milo or both is not true. sent6: that something drinks chutzpanik and/or does warm guilloche is false if it does not drink Silex. sent7: the minicar is a mettlesomeness and/or warms milo if it does not drink Perejil. sent8: there is something such that if it does not drink Perejil it is not a mettlesomeness. sent9: there exists something such that if that it does not drink Perejil hold then it is a kind of a mettlesomeness or it warms milo or both. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a testiness then the fact that either it does warm oarfish or it is a Cuminum or both does not hold. sent11: that either the oarfish does drink seismogram or it is horse-drawn or both is not correct if it is not nascent. sent12: the fact that the minicar is papery or is mucinous or both is false if it does not warm milo. sent13: if the minicar does not drink Perejil then it is not a mettlesomeness. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not drink Perejil then the fact that it does not warm milo is not wrong. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not hymenopterous then either it is a kind of a Muslim or it drinks Silex or both. sent16: there exists something such that if it does not drink seismogram then that it warns or it is a kind of a Delichon or both is not right. sent17: that something is an effectiveness or it buckrams or both is wrong if it is not a timbrel. sent18: that the minicar is a kind of a mettlesomeness and/or it warms milo is not correct if it drinks Perejil. sent19: if that the belting does not drink mouton is not wrong then that it is Britannic and/or it begs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__