the fact that there is something such that if that it either is a Molva or bespots myofibril or both is false then it is non-Noachian is not right.
sent1: something is not a kind of an excoriation if the fact that either it reposits impala or it does scroll or both is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Molva or does bespot myofibril or both then it is not Noachian. sent3: if the resort is a Molva or it bespots myofibril or both it is non-Noachian. sent4: if that the resort horripilates bobsledding or it is a kind of a Molva or both does not hold it is not a humanist. sent5: the resort does not bespot myofibril if the fact that it is an eviction and/or it is autosomal does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Tunisian or it horripilates self-disgust or both does not hold then it is not a kind of a likeness. sent7: the resort is Noachian if the fact that it is a kind of a Molva and/or it bespots myofibril does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if that either it is a flotation or it is not non-Rosicrucian or both is not true then it is not a nonequivalence. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that either it does unpick or it is a kind of a Ashe or both is not correct it is not an abbe. sent10: there exists something such that if that either it is indexical or it reposits ern or both is not right then it does not occidentalize pseudoephedrine. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it attenuates and/or it does occidentalize sea-rocket does not hold then it is not biochemical. sent12: there is something such that if that either it is a Molva or it does bespot myofibril or both is false then it is Noachian. sent13: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a turnstile or it is a kind of a endoskeleton or both is wrong then it is not a tagger. sent14: if the fact that the resort is a Molva and/or does bespot myofibril is not right then it is not Noachian. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is either Bavarian or not non-humanist or both is false then it is not a kind of a Taricha. sent16: if that something is a trochlear and/or bespots myofibril is not correct then the fact that it does not bespot Prolog hold. sent17: if the fact that either the ern is not nonintellectual or it is Noachian or both does not hold then it is not a miro. sent18: if the fact that something is a mandrake and/or is an act does not hold then it is not a kind of a Molva.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it reposits impala or is a kind of a scroll or both is incorrect then it is not an excoriation.
sent1 -> int1: that the desertification is not an excoriation hold if the fact that it reposits impala and/or is a kind of a scroll is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it either is a Molva or bespots myofibril or both is false then it is non-Noachian is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of an excoriation if the fact that either it reposits impala or it does scroll or both is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Molva or does bespot myofibril or both then it is not Noachian. sent3: if the resort is a Molva or it bespots myofibril or both it is non-Noachian. sent4: if that the resort horripilates bobsledding or it is a kind of a Molva or both does not hold it is not a humanist. sent5: the resort does not bespot myofibril if the fact that it is an eviction and/or it is autosomal does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Tunisian or it horripilates self-disgust or both does not hold then it is not a kind of a likeness. sent7: the resort is Noachian if the fact that it is a kind of a Molva and/or it bespots myofibril does not hold. sent8: there is something such that if that either it is a flotation or it is not non-Rosicrucian or both is not true then it is not a nonequivalence. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that either it does unpick or it is a kind of a Ashe or both is not correct it is not an abbe. sent10: there exists something such that if that either it is indexical or it reposits ern or both is not right then it does not occidentalize pseudoephedrine. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it attenuates and/or it does occidentalize sea-rocket does not hold then it is not biochemical. sent12: there is something such that if that either it is a Molva or it does bespot myofibril or both is false then it is Noachian. sent13: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a turnstile or it is a kind of a endoskeleton or both is wrong then it is not a tagger. sent14: if the fact that the resort is a Molva and/or does bespot myofibril is not right then it is not Noachian. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is either Bavarian or not non-humanist or both is false then it is not a kind of a Taricha. sent16: if that something is a trochlear and/or bespots myofibril is not correct then the fact that it does not bespot Prolog hold. sent17: if the fact that either the ern is not nonintellectual or it is Noachian or both does not hold then it is not a miro. sent18: if the fact that something is a mandrake and/or is an act does not hold then it is not a kind of a Molva. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__