the suppurativeness does not occur.
sent1: if the streptococcalness does not occur then the fact that the suppurativeness and the epidemic happens does not hold. sent2: if the epidemic does not occur both the suppurativeness and the difference occurs. sent3: the suppurativeness does not occur if the difference occurs and the epidemic occurs. sent4: that both the non-epidemicness and the streptococcalness happens is triggered by that the censoring does not occur. sent5: if the hewing does not occur the fact that the distraining and the censor occurs does not hold. sent6: the epidemic occurs. sent7: if the epidemic does not occur the underlying happens and the difference occurs. sent8: that the censor does not occur is true if that the distraining happens and the censor happens does not hold.
the suppurativeness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the suppurativeness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the streptococcalness does not occur then the fact that the suppurativeness and the epidemic happens does not hold. sent2: if the epidemic does not occur both the suppurativeness and the difference occurs. sent3: the suppurativeness does not occur if the difference occurs and the epidemic occurs. sent4: that both the non-epidemicness and the streptococcalness happens is triggered by that the censoring does not occur. sent5: if the hewing does not occur the fact that the distraining and the censor occurs does not hold. sent6: the epidemic occurs. sent7: if the epidemic does not occur the underlying happens and the difference occurs. sent8: that the censor does not occur is true if that the distraining happens and the censor happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__