that the blintz is not a stacte but it is linguistics is correct.
sent1: the fact that the blintz is a kind of a stacte but it does not deduce Hasdrubal is not correct. sent2: the blintz is a substitution and it is a bunny. sent3: that the blintz is not a kind of a stacte and deduces Hasdrubal does not hold. sent4: the Crane does unbar disorganization. sent5: if the turpentine is chlorophyllose the Crane is not a reverie and not chlorophyllose. sent6: if the blintz is a kind of a place it is linguistics. sent7: if the blintz does deduce ductule then it is linguistics. sent8: the blintz is not inaccurate if it is a kind of a bunny. sent9: if the blintz is not inaccurate the fact that it does deduce ductule or it places or both hold. sent10: the fact that the Crane is not chlorophyllose is not incorrect. sent11: the blintz is a substitution. sent12: the Crane does unbar disorganization and is a kind of a reverie.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the blintz is not a stacte and it does not deduce Hasdrubal is not right.; sent12 -> int1: the Crane is a kind of a reverie.; sent2 -> int2: the blintz is a kind of a bunny.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the blintz is not inaccurate.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: either the blintz deduces ductule or it does place or both.; int4 & sent7 & sent6 -> int5: the blintz is linguistics.;
$hypothesis$ = that the blintz is not a stacte but it is linguistics is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the blintz is a kind of a stacte but it does not deduce Hasdrubal is not correct. sent2: the blintz is a substitution and it is a bunny. sent3: that the blintz is not a kind of a stacte and deduces Hasdrubal does not hold. sent4: the Crane does unbar disorganization. sent5: if the turpentine is chlorophyllose the Crane is not a reverie and not chlorophyllose. sent6: if the blintz is a kind of a place it is linguistics. sent7: if the blintz does deduce ductule then it is linguistics. sent8: the blintz is not inaccurate if it is a kind of a bunny. sent9: if the blintz is not inaccurate the fact that it does deduce ductule or it places or both hold. sent10: the fact that the Crane is not chlorophyllose is not incorrect. sent11: the blintz is a substitution. sent12: the Crane does unbar disorganization and is a kind of a reverie. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the blintz is not a stacte and it does not deduce Hasdrubal is not right.; sent12 -> int1: the Crane is a kind of a reverie.; sent2 -> int2: the blintz is a kind of a bunny.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the blintz is not inaccurate.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: either the blintz deduces ductule or it does place or both.; int4 & sent7 & sent6 -> int5: the blintz is linguistics.; __UNKNOWN__