that the scalding moderationist happens or the bespangling Steinman occurs or both is incorrect.
sent1: the scalding jargoon results in the bespangling Steinman. sent2: if the scalding show-stopper does not occur and the pyrotechnicness does not occur then the fact that the impartialness does not occur is correct. sent3: that the dissipation does not occur is prevented by the preclinicalness. sent4: if the fact that the indiscriminateness does not occur is not false then both the ambushing and the honk happens. sent5: that the geysering sociometry occurs prevents the non-Jewishness. sent6: if the hanging does not occur then the scalding show-stopper does not occur and the pyrotechnicness does not occur. sent7: the opened does not occur. sent8: the toxicologicalness or the bespangling sky or both happens. sent9: both the cosmologicness and the impartialness occurs. sent10: if the impartialness does not occur then that the cosmologicness but not the scalding jargoon occurs does not hold. sent11: that the opening does not occur causes that the overlordship and the destining product occurs. sent12: if the cosmologicness does not occur the fact that the scalding moderationist occurs and/or the bespangling Steinman happens is not right. sent13: the scalding jargoon happens if the impartialness happens. sent14: the initiation happens. sent15: both the aldermanicness and the sublittoralness happens. sent16: that the ambushing happens brings about that the hanging does not occur and the fallout does not occur. sent17: the indiscriminateness does not occur if both the destining product and the scalding ounce occurs. sent18: the velar occurs if the converging occurs. sent19: if the nascentness happens the insecureness happens. sent20: the bespangling exhibit happens and the employable occurs.
sent9 -> int1: the impartialness occurs.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the scalding jargoon happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the bespangling Steinman happens.; int3 -> hypothesis;
that the scalding moderationist occurs and/or the bespangling Steinman happens is not true.
sent11 & sent7 -> int4: both the overlordship and the destining product happens.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the destining product does not occur is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the scalding moderationist happens or the bespangling Steinman occurs or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the scalding jargoon results in the bespangling Steinman. sent2: if the scalding show-stopper does not occur and the pyrotechnicness does not occur then the fact that the impartialness does not occur is correct. sent3: that the dissipation does not occur is prevented by the preclinicalness. sent4: if the fact that the indiscriminateness does not occur is not false then both the ambushing and the honk happens. sent5: that the geysering sociometry occurs prevents the non-Jewishness. sent6: if the hanging does not occur then the scalding show-stopper does not occur and the pyrotechnicness does not occur. sent7: the opened does not occur. sent8: the toxicologicalness or the bespangling sky or both happens. sent9: both the cosmologicness and the impartialness occurs. sent10: if the impartialness does not occur then that the cosmologicness but not the scalding jargoon occurs does not hold. sent11: that the opening does not occur causes that the overlordship and the destining product occurs. sent12: if the cosmologicness does not occur the fact that the scalding moderationist occurs and/or the bespangling Steinman happens is not right. sent13: the scalding jargoon happens if the impartialness happens. sent14: the initiation happens. sent15: both the aldermanicness and the sublittoralness happens. sent16: that the ambushing happens brings about that the hanging does not occur and the fallout does not occur. sent17: the indiscriminateness does not occur if both the destining product and the scalding ounce occurs. sent18: the velar occurs if the converging occurs. sent19: if the nascentness happens the insecureness happens. sent20: the bespangling exhibit happens and the employable occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the impartialness occurs.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the scalding jargoon happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the bespangling Steinman happens.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__