the insecticidalness does not occur.
sent1: the nominalisticness occurs and the salving occurs. sent2: that the insecticidalness does not occur is not false if the secession happens and the salve occurs. sent3: the dissenting dacoity and the secession happens. sent4: if the salve does not occur the fact that both the non-nominalisticness and the non-micrometeoricness happens does not hold. sent5: if that both the non-nominalisticness and the non-micrometeoricness occurs does not hold then the micrometeoricness occurs. sent6: if the secession does not occur then that the nominalisticness does not occur or the salve does not occur or both is wrong. sent7: the dissenting dacoity happens.
sent1 -> int1: the salving occurs.; sent3 -> int2: the secession happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the secession occurs and the salve occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the micrometeoricness happens and the revivalisticness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the insecticidalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the nominalisticness occurs and the salving occurs. sent2: that the insecticidalness does not occur is not false if the secession happens and the salve occurs. sent3: the dissenting dacoity and the secession happens. sent4: if the salve does not occur the fact that both the non-nominalisticness and the non-micrometeoricness happens does not hold. sent5: if that both the non-nominalisticness and the non-micrometeoricness occurs does not hold then the micrometeoricness occurs. sent6: if the secession does not occur then that the nominalisticness does not occur or the salve does not occur or both is wrong. sent7: the dissenting dacoity happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the salving occurs.; sent3 -> int2: the secession happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the secession occurs and the salve occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__