the poser is not a Limnobium.
sent1: if something is not decisive and/or is an emission the fact that the pleurodont is not decisive hold. sent2: the slumgullion is either a Tianjin or nonconductive or both. sent3: something is a Limnobium if it is a redundancy. sent4: if the tachylite is a Limnobium the poser is a kind of a Limnobium. sent5: the thermion is not decisive and/or it is a kind of an emission. sent6: that the poser does not wave deaconess but it is a redundancy is incorrect if the fact that the tachylite is not a redundancy is true. sent7: if the fact that something does not wave deaconess but it is a redundancy does not hold it is not a Limnobium. sent8: the tachylite is not a redundancy if the fact that either the pleurodont does not crate or it is trustful or both is not correct. sent9: if something is not a crate and/or is trustful it is decisive.
sent9 -> int1: if the pleurodont is not a crate and/or it is trustful it is decisive.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pleurodont is not a crate or it is trustful or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pleurodont is decisive.; sent5 -> int3: there exists something such that either it is not decisive or it is an emission or both.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the pleurodont is indecisive.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the pleurodont is either not a crate or trustful or both is not correct.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the tachylite is not a redundancy.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: that the poser does not wave deaconess but it is a kind of a redundancy is not correct.; sent7 -> int9: the poser is not a Limnobium if the fact that the fact that it does not wave deaconess and it is a kind of a redundancy hold is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the poser is a Limnobium.
sent3 -> int10: that the tachylite is a kind of a Limnobium is correct if it is a redundancy.;
$hypothesis$ = the poser is not a Limnobium. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not decisive and/or is an emission the fact that the pleurodont is not decisive hold. sent2: the slumgullion is either a Tianjin or nonconductive or both. sent3: something is a Limnobium if it is a redundancy. sent4: if the tachylite is a Limnobium the poser is a kind of a Limnobium. sent5: the thermion is not decisive and/or it is a kind of an emission. sent6: that the poser does not wave deaconess but it is a redundancy is incorrect if the fact that the tachylite is not a redundancy is true. sent7: if the fact that something does not wave deaconess but it is a redundancy does not hold it is not a Limnobium. sent8: the tachylite is not a redundancy if the fact that either the pleurodont does not crate or it is trustful or both is not correct. sent9: if something is not a crate and/or is trustful it is decisive. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: if the pleurodont is not a crate and/or it is trustful it is decisive.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pleurodont is not a crate or it is trustful or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pleurodont is decisive.; sent5 -> int3: there exists something such that either it is not decisive or it is an emission or both.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the pleurodont is indecisive.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the pleurodont is either not a crate or trustful or both is not correct.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the tachylite is not a redundancy.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: that the poser does not wave deaconess but it is a kind of a redundancy is not correct.; sent7 -> int9: the poser is not a Limnobium if the fact that the fact that it does not wave deaconess and it is a kind of a redundancy hold is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__