the intending does not occur and the sumo does not occur if the grunting happens.
sent1: the idealization but not the trolling Dawson happens. sent2: the idealization occurs if that the accelerating mariposa does not occur and the waving Dawson does not occur is not true. sent3: if that the levorotation happens hold that the trolling decumary does not occur and the nudging does not occur is false. sent4: that the renewableness does not occur is not false if the rockslide happens. sent5: if the gavotte occurs the fact that the rockslide but not the tarsalness occurs is not incorrect. sent6: if the psycholinguisticness occurs the decisiveness happens but the lay-up does not occur. sent7: the fact that the badminton occurs hold if the fact that the trolling decumary does not occur and the nudge does not occur is incorrect. sent8: both the dyadicness and the transmogrification happens. sent9: the stream is caused by the waving unconventionality. sent10: the brew does not occur and the waving Senor does not occur if that the microscopicness happens is not incorrect. sent11: if the levorotation does not occur then that the differentiation does not occur and the decisiveness does not occur is wrong. sent12: that the badminton occurs and the grunting happens prevents that the kibitzing occurs. sent13: the levorotation happens. sent14: the intending does not occur and the sumo does not occur if the kibitzing does not occur. sent15: the fact that the ruggedization does not occur and the workflow happens is not true.
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: that the trolling decumary does not occur and the nudge does not occur is false.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the badminton occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grunt happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the badminton and the grunting happens.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the kibitzing does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the intending does not occur and the sumo does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the differentiation does not occur and the decisiveness does not occur is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the intending does not occur and the sumo does not occur if the grunting happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the idealization but not the trolling Dawson happens. sent2: the idealization occurs if that the accelerating mariposa does not occur and the waving Dawson does not occur is not true. sent3: if that the levorotation happens hold that the trolling decumary does not occur and the nudging does not occur is false. sent4: that the renewableness does not occur is not false if the rockslide happens. sent5: if the gavotte occurs the fact that the rockslide but not the tarsalness occurs is not incorrect. sent6: if the psycholinguisticness occurs the decisiveness happens but the lay-up does not occur. sent7: the fact that the badminton occurs hold if the fact that the trolling decumary does not occur and the nudge does not occur is incorrect. sent8: both the dyadicness and the transmogrification happens. sent9: the stream is caused by the waving unconventionality. sent10: the brew does not occur and the waving Senor does not occur if that the microscopicness happens is not incorrect. sent11: if the levorotation does not occur then that the differentiation does not occur and the decisiveness does not occur is wrong. sent12: that the badminton occurs and the grunting happens prevents that the kibitzing occurs. sent13: the levorotation happens. sent14: the intending does not occur and the sumo does not occur if the kibitzing does not occur. sent15: the fact that the ruggedization does not occur and the workflow happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: that the trolling decumary does not occur and the nudge does not occur is false.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the badminton occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grunt happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the badminton and the grunting happens.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the kibitzing does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the intending does not occur and the sumo does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__