the relacing representation occurs.
sent1: that the BAR occurs causes the fact that that the relacing nudger does not occur and the indecentness occurs is true. sent2: the calyptrateness does not occur and the prodding floccule does not occur. sent3: the relacing representation does not occur if the relacing nudger does not occur but the indecentness happens. sent4: the breakfasting happens if that the miming does not occur and the semifinal occurs is wrong. sent5: the intertidalness occurs. sent6: if the breakfast occurs the seething occurs. sent7: the seething prevents that the BAR does not occur. sent8: if the mime does not occur but the semifinal happens the calyptrateness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mime does not occur but the semifinal happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the calyptrateness occurs.; sent2 -> int2: the calyptrateness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that not the miming but the semifinal occurs is false.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the breakfast occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the seething happens is correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the BAR occurs.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the relacing nudger does not occur and the indecentness occurs.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the relacing representation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the BAR occurs causes the fact that that the relacing nudger does not occur and the indecentness occurs is true. sent2: the calyptrateness does not occur and the prodding floccule does not occur. sent3: the relacing representation does not occur if the relacing nudger does not occur but the indecentness happens. sent4: the breakfasting happens if that the miming does not occur and the semifinal occurs is wrong. sent5: the intertidalness occurs. sent6: if the breakfast occurs the seething occurs. sent7: the seething prevents that the BAR does not occur. sent8: if the mime does not occur but the semifinal happens the calyptrateness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mime does not occur but the semifinal happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the calyptrateness occurs.; sent2 -> int2: the calyptrateness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that not the miming but the semifinal occurs is false.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the breakfast occurs.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the seething happens is correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the BAR occurs.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the relacing nudger does not occur and the indecentness occurs.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__