the stem happens.
sent1: the filing does not occur but the generating occurs. sent2: the fact that the intifada does not occur is correct if the filing does not occur and the generating happens. sent3: the nosocomialness occurs and the cruelty does not occur if the faltering does not occur. sent4: the gust occurs. sent5: if the gust does not occur the faltering but not the Dickensianness occurs. sent6: both the lighting and the intercommunicating occurs. sent7: that the fulfillment does not occur is prevented by that the lightness occurs. sent8: that the faltering and the gust occurs prevents the fulfillment. sent9: if the gust does not occur then the fact that both the faltering and the stemming occurs is wrong. sent10: if the cruelty does not occur and the intifada does not occur the stem happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the faltering occurs.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the faltering happens and the gust occurs is true.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the fulfillment happens is wrong.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the lighting occurs is not wrong.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the fulfillment happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the faltering does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the nosocomialness happens and the cruelty does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the cruelty does not occur.; sent2 & sent1 -> int9: the intifada does not occur.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the cruelty does not occur and the intifada does not occur.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Dickensianness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the stem happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the filing does not occur but the generating occurs. sent2: the fact that the intifada does not occur is correct if the filing does not occur and the generating happens. sent3: the nosocomialness occurs and the cruelty does not occur if the faltering does not occur. sent4: the gust occurs. sent5: if the gust does not occur the faltering but not the Dickensianness occurs. sent6: both the lighting and the intercommunicating occurs. sent7: that the fulfillment does not occur is prevented by that the lightness occurs. sent8: that the faltering and the gust occurs prevents the fulfillment. sent9: if the gust does not occur then the fact that both the faltering and the stemming occurs is wrong. sent10: if the cruelty does not occur and the intifada does not occur the stem happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the faltering occurs.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the faltering happens and the gust occurs is true.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the fulfillment happens is wrong.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the lighting occurs is not wrong.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the fulfillment happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the faltering does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the nosocomialness happens and the cruelty does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the cruelty does not occur.; sent2 & sent1 -> int9: the intifada does not occur.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the cruelty does not occur and the intifada does not occur.; int10 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__