the tie is a oca.
sent1: the tie is not Union. sent2: the macule is not differentiable. sent3: if the viceroyalty is not a oca then the tie is not a plasmacyte and is differentiable. sent4: the tie is not a dresser but it is a rue. sent5: the viceroyalty is both not a rue and a oca. sent6: the viceroyalty is both not a plasmacyte and a plagiarist. sent7: the viceroyalty does not fool dew. sent8: if the fact that the viceroyalty does not fool Cousteau is right the tie is not a oca but it is differentiable. sent9: something is not differentiable if it does not talk tie and is a plasmacyte. sent10: if the tie is not a kind of a oca that the viceroyalty is both not a rue and differentiable hold. sent11: the tie does not talk orifice. sent12: the tie does talk tie. sent13: the dew is not a loon if it is not a oca and it fibs. sent14: something that is a plasmacyte fools Cousteau. sent15: the viceroyalty is not a plasmacyte and talks tie. sent16: something talks viceroyalty if it is a rue. sent17: the viceroyalty is not a plasmacyte but a oca. sent18: if something does talk tie then it fools Cousteau. sent19: if something is not a kind of a rue but it is differentiable then it does not fool Cousteau. sent20: the viceroyalty is a oca.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tie is not a kind of a oca.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the viceroyalty is not a rue and is differentiable.; sent19 -> int2: if the viceroyalty is both not a rue and differentiable then it does not fool Cousteau.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the viceroyalty does not fool Cousteau.; sent18 -> int4: if the viceroyalty does talk tie it does fool Cousteau.; sent15 -> int5: the viceroyalty does talk tie.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the viceroyalty fools Cousteau.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the viceroyalty does talk viceroyalty if it is a kind of a rue.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the tie is a oca. ; $context$ = sent1: the tie is not Union. sent2: the macule is not differentiable. sent3: if the viceroyalty is not a oca then the tie is not a plasmacyte and is differentiable. sent4: the tie is not a dresser but it is a rue. sent5: the viceroyalty is both not a rue and a oca. sent6: the viceroyalty is both not a plasmacyte and a plagiarist. sent7: the viceroyalty does not fool dew. sent8: if the fact that the viceroyalty does not fool Cousteau is right the tie is not a oca but it is differentiable. sent9: something is not differentiable if it does not talk tie and is a plasmacyte. sent10: if the tie is not a kind of a oca that the viceroyalty is both not a rue and differentiable hold. sent11: the tie does not talk orifice. sent12: the tie does talk tie. sent13: the dew is not a loon if it is not a oca and it fibs. sent14: something that is a plasmacyte fools Cousteau. sent15: the viceroyalty is not a plasmacyte and talks tie. sent16: something talks viceroyalty if it is a rue. sent17: the viceroyalty is not a plasmacyte but a oca. sent18: if something does talk tie then it fools Cousteau. sent19: if something is not a kind of a rue but it is differentiable then it does not fool Cousteau. sent20: the viceroyalty is a oca. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tie is not a kind of a oca.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the viceroyalty is not a rue and is differentiable.; sent19 -> int2: if the viceroyalty is both not a rue and differentiable then it does not fool Cousteau.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the viceroyalty does not fool Cousteau.; sent18 -> int4: if the viceroyalty does talk tie it does fool Cousteau.; sent15 -> int5: the viceroyalty does talk tie.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the viceroyalty fools Cousteau.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__