the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not macromolecular hold then the fact that it tenures and it is a electromyography is not true is incorrect.
sent1: if the pantaloon is macromolecular then that it is a tenure and it is a electromyography is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it does whistle symphonist the fact that it is pyroligneous a fig-bird is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it is machine-made that it is a kind of myelinic thing that does whistle agio is not true. sent4: if the pantaloon does not incubate that it is archangelic thing that regrets is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Aeolian then the fact that it is a Hebrew and irrelevant does not hold. sent6: the fact that the pantaloon is a kind of a tenure that is a kind of a electromyography is incorrect if it is not macromolecular. sent7: there exists something such that if it does intend then that it is both not non-Lamarckian and a la is not right. sent8: if the niche is not permissible then that it whistles whack and it tenures is wrong. sent9: if the pantaloon is not a kind of a flaw then it does smite pantaloon and is a kind of a tenure. sent10: if the pantaloon is not a Cornish then that it is a kind of permissible thing that is communal does not hold. sent11: if the pantaloon is not a censer the fact that that it does smite Mimosoideae and it is abiogenetic is right does not hold. sent12: that something smites catsup and it is small is wrong if it is not a gigahertz. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not stare then the fact that it is a kind of a redetermination and it flaws is incorrect. sent14: there is something such that if it does not smite hao then that it is a Benton and it is a biquadratic is wrong. sent15: the fact that the Byzantine is a Vouvray that is a electromyography is not correct if it does not reek. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not macromolecular then it is a tenure and it is a electromyography. sent17: there exists something such that if it is minty the fact that it does exhale sisterhood and it prevents does not hold.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
if the pantaloon is not a gigahertz then that it does smite catsup and is small does not hold.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not macromolecular hold then the fact that it tenures and it is a electromyography is not true is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pantaloon is macromolecular then that it is a tenure and it is a electromyography is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it does whistle symphonist the fact that it is pyroligneous a fig-bird is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it is machine-made that it is a kind of myelinic thing that does whistle agio is not true. sent4: if the pantaloon does not incubate that it is archangelic thing that regrets is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Aeolian then the fact that it is a Hebrew and irrelevant does not hold. sent6: the fact that the pantaloon is a kind of a tenure that is a kind of a electromyography is incorrect if it is not macromolecular. sent7: there exists something such that if it does intend then that it is both not non-Lamarckian and a la is not right. sent8: if the niche is not permissible then that it whistles whack and it tenures is wrong. sent9: if the pantaloon is not a kind of a flaw then it does smite pantaloon and is a kind of a tenure. sent10: if the pantaloon is not a Cornish then that it is a kind of permissible thing that is communal does not hold. sent11: if the pantaloon is not a censer the fact that that it does smite Mimosoideae and it is abiogenetic is right does not hold. sent12: that something smites catsup and it is small is wrong if it is not a gigahertz. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not stare then the fact that it is a kind of a redetermination and it flaws is incorrect. sent14: there is something such that if it does not smite hao then that it is a Benton and it is a biquadratic is wrong. sent15: the fact that the Byzantine is a Vouvray that is a electromyography is not correct if it does not reek. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not macromolecular then it is a tenure and it is a electromyography. sent17: there exists something such that if it is minty the fact that it does exhale sisterhood and it prevents does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__