the denier is a kind of an undine.
sent1: the ivy is not apopemptic. sent2: the spouse is apopemptic. sent3: the fact that the negativist is ecological is correct. sent4: the spouse does not unloose denier and is ecological if the ivy is not ecological. sent5: the denier is a kind of a horsefly if the ivy does frame. sent6: if the denier does frame and it is ecological then it is not a kind of a dowser. sent7: if the denier is not a framing but it is not non-ecological it is not a dowser. sent8: the denier does not frame but it is ecological if the spouse is not ecological. sent9: the morello is a kind of an undine. sent10: there is something such that it unlooses denier and is a Turkish. sent11: if the spouse does not frame then that it is not a kind of a Turkish and it is not ecological is false. sent12: the denier is not a framing. sent13: if there exists something such that it is apopemptic and ecological the psychrometer is not Turkish. sent14: the psychrometer is Turkish and ecological if it does not frame. sent15: the ivy unlooses denier if it is a horsefly. sent16: the psychrometer is Turkish if the ivy does unloose denier. sent17: if the psychrometer is both not a dowser and an undine then that it is not a Turkish is right. sent18: the fact that the ivy is a horsefly is true. sent19: if something is not a kind of a horsefly then it is an undine. sent20: that if something is not a dowser it is a kind of an undine is not incorrect. sent21: if the ivy is ecological the denier is a kind of a horsefly. sent22: something is apopemptic. sent23: the fact that the denier is not a framing hold if the spouse is not ecological. sent24: there is something such that it is ecological. sent25: the fact that the psychrometer is not a kind of a horsefly is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spouse is ecological.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the spouse is apopemptic and is ecological.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is apopemptic and it is ecological.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the psychrometer is not a Turkish.; sent15 & sent18 -> int4: the ivy does unloose denier.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the psychrometer is not non-Turkish.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the spouse is not ecological.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the denier is not a framing but it is ecological.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the denier is not a dowser.; sent20 -> int10: if the denier is not a kind of a dowser then it is a kind of an undine.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the bimonthly is not apopemptic.
$hypothesis$ = the denier is a kind of an undine. ; $context$ = sent1: the ivy is not apopemptic. sent2: the spouse is apopemptic. sent3: the fact that the negativist is ecological is correct. sent4: the spouse does not unloose denier and is ecological if the ivy is not ecological. sent5: the denier is a kind of a horsefly if the ivy does frame. sent6: if the denier does frame and it is ecological then it is not a kind of a dowser. sent7: if the denier is not a framing but it is not non-ecological it is not a dowser. sent8: the denier does not frame but it is ecological if the spouse is not ecological. sent9: the morello is a kind of an undine. sent10: there is something such that it unlooses denier and is a Turkish. sent11: if the spouse does not frame then that it is not a kind of a Turkish and it is not ecological is false. sent12: the denier is not a framing. sent13: if there exists something such that it is apopemptic and ecological the psychrometer is not Turkish. sent14: the psychrometer is Turkish and ecological if it does not frame. sent15: the ivy unlooses denier if it is a horsefly. sent16: the psychrometer is Turkish if the ivy does unloose denier. sent17: if the psychrometer is both not a dowser and an undine then that it is not a Turkish is right. sent18: the fact that the ivy is a horsefly is true. sent19: if something is not a kind of a horsefly then it is an undine. sent20: that if something is not a dowser it is a kind of an undine is not incorrect. sent21: if the ivy is ecological the denier is a kind of a horsefly. sent22: something is apopemptic. sent23: the fact that the denier is not a framing hold if the spouse is not ecological. sent24: there is something such that it is ecological. sent25: the fact that the psychrometer is not a kind of a horsefly is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spouse is ecological.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the spouse is apopemptic and is ecological.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is apopemptic and it is ecological.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the psychrometer is not a Turkish.; sent15 & sent18 -> int4: the ivy does unloose denier.; sent16 & int4 -> int5: the psychrometer is not non-Turkish.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the spouse is not ecological.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the denier is not a framing but it is ecological.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the denier is not a dowser.; sent20 -> int10: if the denier is not a kind of a dowser then it is a kind of an undine.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__