that the agateware is both gymnospermous and not carboxyl is not right.
sent1: if something is a kind of a Victorian or is a peripheral or both the pasang is a carboxyl. sent2: the snip does house brachycephalic. sent3: that if the snip is not a kind of a carboxyl then the agateware is gymnospermous and is not carboxyl is correct. sent4: the fact that something is not a lespedeza and it does not house brachycephalic is false if that it is not Victorian is not incorrect. sent5: the pasang is a Victorian if the portcullis is a lespedeza. sent6: if the pasang is not a Victorian and/or it is a peripheral then the portcullis is not Victorian. sent7: the agateware is gymnospermous. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Victorian. sent9: if the snip is not a carboxyl then that the agateware is gymnospermous hold. sent10: if something is anthropometric the fact that the pasang is a Calvary is true. sent11: if there exists something such that it is anthropometric that the counterbore is not a Calvary and it is not a debut is not correct. sent12: that something is gymnospermous but it is not a carboxyl is wrong if it is not a lespedeza. sent13: if the snip is a Calvary then it is a peripheral. sent14: the snip is not a carboxyl if something is a kind of a Victorian that is a kind of a peripheral. sent15: the portcullis is a kind of a lespedeza and it does house brachycephalic. sent16: that the snip is a Calvary is true if there exists something such that that it is not a Calvary and it is not a debut is not correct. sent17: if either something is anthropometric or it debuts or both then the pasang is a kind of a Calvary. sent18: if something is a Calvary then that it is a peripheral hold. sent19: something is a peripheral. sent20: the portcullis houses brachycephalic. sent21: that something either is anthropometric or is a kind of a debut or both hold. sent22: something does house brachycephalic if it is gymnospermous.
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the portcullis is a lespedeza is right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the pasang is a Victorian.; sent18 -> int3: if the pasang is a Calvary then it is a peripheral.; sent21 & sent17 -> int4: the pasang is a Calvary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pasang is a peripheral.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the pasang is a Victorian and it is peripheral.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a Victorian that is a kind of a peripheral.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the snip is not carboxyl.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the agateware is gymnospermous but not a carboxyl is false hold.
sent12 -> int9: if the agateware is not a lespedeza then that it is gymnospermous and is not carboxyl does not hold.; sent4 -> int10: if the portcullis is not a Victorian then the fact that it is not a lespedeza and does not house brachycephalic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the agateware is both gymnospermous and not carboxyl is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a Victorian or is a peripheral or both the pasang is a carboxyl. sent2: the snip does house brachycephalic. sent3: that if the snip is not a kind of a carboxyl then the agateware is gymnospermous and is not carboxyl is correct. sent4: the fact that something is not a lespedeza and it does not house brachycephalic is false if that it is not Victorian is not incorrect. sent5: the pasang is a Victorian if the portcullis is a lespedeza. sent6: if the pasang is not a Victorian and/or it is a peripheral then the portcullis is not Victorian. sent7: the agateware is gymnospermous. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Victorian. sent9: if the snip is not a carboxyl then that the agateware is gymnospermous hold. sent10: if something is anthropometric the fact that the pasang is a Calvary is true. sent11: if there exists something such that it is anthropometric that the counterbore is not a Calvary and it is not a debut is not correct. sent12: that something is gymnospermous but it is not a carboxyl is wrong if it is not a lespedeza. sent13: if the snip is a Calvary then it is a peripheral. sent14: the snip is not a carboxyl if something is a kind of a Victorian that is a kind of a peripheral. sent15: the portcullis is a kind of a lespedeza and it does house brachycephalic. sent16: that the snip is a Calvary is true if there exists something such that that it is not a Calvary and it is not a debut is not correct. sent17: if either something is anthropometric or it debuts or both then the pasang is a kind of a Calvary. sent18: if something is a Calvary then that it is a peripheral hold. sent19: something is a peripheral. sent20: the portcullis houses brachycephalic. sent21: that something either is anthropometric or is a kind of a debut or both hold. sent22: something does house brachycephalic if it is gymnospermous. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: the fact that the portcullis is a lespedeza is right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the pasang is a Victorian.; sent18 -> int3: if the pasang is a Calvary then it is a peripheral.; sent21 & sent17 -> int4: the pasang is a Calvary.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pasang is a peripheral.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the pasang is a Victorian and it is peripheral.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a Victorian that is a kind of a peripheral.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the snip is not carboxyl.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__