that the hutch is inanimate and is not feminist is wrong if the cytosine flocks paperhanger.
sent1: the fact that the pellitory is inanimate is right. sent2: that the cytosine is feminist and not inanimate is not true if the fact that the hutch flocks paperhanger is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that it flocks paperhanger. sent4: the lawrencium is not feminist. sent5: if that something is not a associateship but it is a practice is not right it does substantiate. sent6: the cytosine is not a kind of a feminist. sent7: something flocks paperhanger but it does not cathect scolion if it does not dislodge. sent8: if the cytosine is a feminist the hutch does flock paperhanger but it is not inanimate. sent9: that the hutch is a kind of inanimate thing that does not flock paperhanger does not hold. sent10: the fact that the contributor is not a associateship but a practice is incorrect. sent11: if an inanimate thing is not a feminist then the cytosine does not flock paperhanger. sent12: the fact that the cytosine is inanimate and it is a USMC is wrong. sent13: something does flock paperhanger and is inanimate. sent14: the hutch does flock paperhanger. sent15: the fact that the hutch is not a feminist hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hutch is inanimate but it is not a feminist.; assump2 -> int1: there exists something such that it is inanimate and is not a kind of a feminist.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the cytosine does not flock paperhanger.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cytosine flocks paperhanger.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hutch is inanimate thing that is not a feminist is not right.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the mangabey is not a kind of a feminist.
sent7 -> int5: that the cytosine flocks paperhanger but it does not cathect scolion if the cytosine does not dislodge is right.; sent5 -> int6: if that the contributor is not a associateship and is a kind of a practice is wrong it does substantiate.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the contributor does substantiate.; int7 -> int8: something does substantiate.;
$hypothesis$ = that the hutch is inanimate and is not feminist is wrong if the cytosine flocks paperhanger. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the pellitory is inanimate is right. sent2: that the cytosine is feminist and not inanimate is not true if the fact that the hutch flocks paperhanger is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that it flocks paperhanger. sent4: the lawrencium is not feminist. sent5: if that something is not a associateship but it is a practice is not right it does substantiate. sent6: the cytosine is not a kind of a feminist. sent7: something flocks paperhanger but it does not cathect scolion if it does not dislodge. sent8: if the cytosine is a feminist the hutch does flock paperhanger but it is not inanimate. sent9: that the hutch is a kind of inanimate thing that does not flock paperhanger does not hold. sent10: the fact that the contributor is not a associateship but a practice is incorrect. sent11: if an inanimate thing is not a feminist then the cytosine does not flock paperhanger. sent12: the fact that the cytosine is inanimate and it is a USMC is wrong. sent13: something does flock paperhanger and is inanimate. sent14: the hutch does flock paperhanger. sent15: the fact that the hutch is not a feminist hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hutch is inanimate but it is not a feminist.; assump2 -> int1: there exists something such that it is inanimate and is not a kind of a feminist.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the cytosine does not flock paperhanger.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cytosine flocks paperhanger.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the hutch is inanimate thing that is not a feminist is not right.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__