there is something such that if it narrows fatigue that it does narrow racetrack and/or it is not an eon is not correct.
sent1: something either does narrow racetrack or is not an eon or both if the fact that it narrows fatigue hold. sent2: that if the bluffer narrows fatigue then either the bluffer is logistic or it does not prophesy or both is correct. sent3: something is an eon if that it narrows fatigue is correct. sent4: if the cotter does narrow racetrack then it does narrow dead and/or it does not narrow ferricyanide. sent5: if something narrows fatigue the fact that either it narrows racetrack or it is not an eon or both does not hold. sent6: the fact that either something is a south or it does narrow Ozawa or both is not true if the fact that it narrows Caravaggio is correct. sent7: that either something narrows fondler or it is a Liverpudlian or both is wrong if it does quench. sent8: something is marmorean and/or it is not a kind of a luster if it is ribless. sent9: if the bluffer does narrow fatigue then it does narrow racetrack and/or it is not an eon.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the bluffer narrows racetrack or is not an eon or both is not correct if it does narrow fatigue.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it narrows fatigue that it does narrow racetrack and/or it is not an eon is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something either does narrow racetrack or is not an eon or both if the fact that it narrows fatigue hold. sent2: that if the bluffer narrows fatigue then either the bluffer is logistic or it does not prophesy or both is correct. sent3: something is an eon if that it narrows fatigue is correct. sent4: if the cotter does narrow racetrack then it does narrow dead and/or it does not narrow ferricyanide. sent5: if something narrows fatigue the fact that either it narrows racetrack or it is not an eon or both does not hold. sent6: the fact that either something is a south or it does narrow Ozawa or both is not true if the fact that it narrows Caravaggio is correct. sent7: that either something narrows fondler or it is a Liverpudlian or both is wrong if it does quench. sent8: something is marmorean and/or it is not a kind of a luster if it is ribless. sent9: if the bluffer does narrow fatigue then it does narrow racetrack and/or it is not an eon. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the bluffer narrows racetrack or is not an eon or both is not correct if it does narrow fatigue.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__