the snub does not occur.
sent1: the choleraicness but not the penetrableness occurs. sent2: that the amaranthineness occurs but the approximation does not occur prevents that the snub does not occur. sent3: the Franciscan happens. sent4: the subtilizing dhow does not occur and the cupricness does not occur. sent5: if the joke does not occur the Light and the inharmoniousness happens. sent6: the calcifugousness does not occur. sent7: the sledding does not occur but the imperial happens if the sibilation does not occur. sent8: the ballooning occurs. sent9: that the amaranthineness does not occur hold if that the glazing hayfork occurs and the galumphing does not occur is not true. sent10: the fact that the schoolwork does not occur is right. sent11: the non-crinoidness is prevented by that the grasping documentation does not occur. sent12: the Light does not occur if not the approximation but the confederation happens. sent13: that the glazing hayfork but not the galumphing occurs yields that the snub does not occur. sent14: if the confederation does not occur the amaranthineness occurs but the approximation does not occur. sent15: the inharmoniousness does not occur. sent16: that the ogling counterdemonstration does not occur leads to that the swindle occurs. sent17: the non-inharmoniousness is prevented by that the Light does not occur and the calcifugousness does not occur. sent18: the cataphaticness does not occur if the ambushing occurs. sent19: the Creole does not occur. sent20: the mumbling happens but the lumping does not occur. sent21: the coup but not the grasping commensal happens. sent22: the ogling discourtesy does not occur. sent23: not the reorganizing but the rainstorm occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the glazing hayfork happens and the galumphing does not occur is false.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the amaranthineness does not occur is true.;
the snub happens.
$hypothesis$ = the snub does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the choleraicness but not the penetrableness occurs. sent2: that the amaranthineness occurs but the approximation does not occur prevents that the snub does not occur. sent3: the Franciscan happens. sent4: the subtilizing dhow does not occur and the cupricness does not occur. sent5: if the joke does not occur the Light and the inharmoniousness happens. sent6: the calcifugousness does not occur. sent7: the sledding does not occur but the imperial happens if the sibilation does not occur. sent8: the ballooning occurs. sent9: that the amaranthineness does not occur hold if that the glazing hayfork occurs and the galumphing does not occur is not true. sent10: the fact that the schoolwork does not occur is right. sent11: the non-crinoidness is prevented by that the grasping documentation does not occur. sent12: the Light does not occur if not the approximation but the confederation happens. sent13: that the glazing hayfork but not the galumphing occurs yields that the snub does not occur. sent14: if the confederation does not occur the amaranthineness occurs but the approximation does not occur. sent15: the inharmoniousness does not occur. sent16: that the ogling counterdemonstration does not occur leads to that the swindle occurs. sent17: the non-inharmoniousness is prevented by that the Light does not occur and the calcifugousness does not occur. sent18: the cataphaticness does not occur if the ambushing occurs. sent19: the Creole does not occur. sent20: the mumbling happens but the lumping does not occur. sent21: the coup but not the grasping commensal happens. sent22: the ogling discourtesy does not occur. sent23: not the reorganizing but the rainstorm occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the glazing hayfork happens and the galumphing does not occur is false.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the amaranthineness does not occur is true.; __UNKNOWN__