the spree happens.
sent1: the spiritlessness happens and/or the lacustrineness happens. sent2: the foundation happens. sent3: the Arawakanness does not occur if that the physicalness occurs and the Arawakanness happens is wrong. sent4: if the tutorial occurs then the disorderliness happens. sent5: the spreading Eisenhower happens if the foundation does not occur. sent6: the diving newsflash occurs if the honorableness or the shinny or both happens. sent7: the spreading hunched does not occur and the respecting tear happens. sent8: the medicolegalness is triggered by the attachment. sent9: the gavotte does not occur if both the foundation and the spree happens. sent10: if the physicalness and the respecting schistosome happens then the Arawakanness does not occur. sent11: the tutorial does not occur if the fact that the stall but not the respecting reciprocal occurs is not correct. sent12: the fact that the stalling happens but the respecting reciprocal does not occur is incorrect if the spreading hunched does not occur. sent13: if the event does not occur or the preoccupancy occurs or both then the intuiting occurs. sent14: the spreeing happens if that the gavotte happens but the spreeing does not occur is incorrect. sent15: the Arawakanness happens if the respecting schistosome does not occur and/or the physicalness occurs. sent16: the tutorial and the respecting reciprocal happens if the fact that the stalling does not occur is not wrong. sent17: that the respecting schistosome does not occur and/or the physicalness occurs hold. sent18: the periodicness occurs and the invertibleness occurs. sent19: if the Arawakanness does not occur the spree occurs or the gavotte does not occur or both. sent20: that the respecting schistosome does not occur prevents the non-Arawakanness. sent21: if the Arawakanness occurs then the gavotte occurs. sent22: if the disorderliness happens then the fact that the respecting schistosome does not occur is not wrong. sent23: the respecting schistosome and/or the physicalness occurs. sent24: the physicalness occurs if the disorderliness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spreeing occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the foundation and the spreeing happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the gavotte does not occur.; sent15 & sent17 -> int3: the Arawakanness occurs.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: the gavotte occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the spreeing occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the spree happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the spiritlessness happens and/or the lacustrineness happens. sent2: the foundation happens. sent3: the Arawakanness does not occur if that the physicalness occurs and the Arawakanness happens is wrong. sent4: if the tutorial occurs then the disorderliness happens. sent5: the spreading Eisenhower happens if the foundation does not occur. sent6: the diving newsflash occurs if the honorableness or the shinny or both happens. sent7: the spreading hunched does not occur and the respecting tear happens. sent8: the medicolegalness is triggered by the attachment. sent9: the gavotte does not occur if both the foundation and the spree happens. sent10: if the physicalness and the respecting schistosome happens then the Arawakanness does not occur. sent11: the tutorial does not occur if the fact that the stall but not the respecting reciprocal occurs is not correct. sent12: the fact that the stalling happens but the respecting reciprocal does not occur is incorrect if the spreading hunched does not occur. sent13: if the event does not occur or the preoccupancy occurs or both then the intuiting occurs. sent14: the spreeing happens if that the gavotte happens but the spreeing does not occur is incorrect. sent15: the Arawakanness happens if the respecting schistosome does not occur and/or the physicalness occurs. sent16: the tutorial and the respecting reciprocal happens if the fact that the stalling does not occur is not wrong. sent17: that the respecting schistosome does not occur and/or the physicalness occurs hold. sent18: the periodicness occurs and the invertibleness occurs. sent19: if the Arawakanness does not occur the spree occurs or the gavotte does not occur or both. sent20: that the respecting schistosome does not occur prevents the non-Arawakanness. sent21: if the Arawakanness occurs then the gavotte occurs. sent22: if the disorderliness happens then the fact that the respecting schistosome does not occur is not wrong. sent23: the respecting schistosome and/or the physicalness occurs. sent24: the physicalness occurs if the disorderliness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spreeing occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the foundation and the spreeing happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the gavotte does not occur.; sent15 & sent17 -> int3: the Arawakanness occurs.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: the gavotte occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__