something is a bowline but it does not sentimentalise harmonization.
sent1: that the dishtowel sulks hold if the tubeless is both conjunctival and not careless. sent2: the fact that the tubeless is expansionist and is not conjunctival is incorrect. sent3: the boneset is not a tree if the tubeless is alterable but it is not an emetic. sent4: the dishtowel does not sentimentalise harmonization if that the vol-au-vent neglects oblong and it sentimentalise harmonization is true. sent5: if the ctene is not a tree but a park the boneset tree. sent6: something is a bowline if it is a kind of a sulk. sent7: the vol-au-vent does neglect oblong and sentimentalises harmonization. sent8: if that that the tubeless is not non-expansionist and not conjunctival is right is incorrect it is conjunctival. sent9: if the tubeless is careless it is alterable but not an emetic. sent10: the rock does not flag. sent11: something is alterable if it does flog. sent12: something is not a wireless.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tubeless is careless.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the tubeless is both alterable and not an emetic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the boneset is not a tree.; sent8 & sent2 -> int3: the tubeless is conjunctival.; sent6 -> int4: the dishtowel is a bowline if it is a sulk.; sent4 & sent7 -> int5: the dishtowel does not sentimentalise harmonization.;
that the fact that the dishtowel is alterable hold if the dishtowel flogs is not wrong.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = something is a bowline but it does not sentimentalise harmonization. ; $context$ = sent1: that the dishtowel sulks hold if the tubeless is both conjunctival and not careless. sent2: the fact that the tubeless is expansionist and is not conjunctival is incorrect. sent3: the boneset is not a tree if the tubeless is alterable but it is not an emetic. sent4: the dishtowel does not sentimentalise harmonization if that the vol-au-vent neglects oblong and it sentimentalise harmonization is true. sent5: if the ctene is not a tree but a park the boneset tree. sent6: something is a bowline if it is a kind of a sulk. sent7: the vol-au-vent does neglect oblong and sentimentalises harmonization. sent8: if that that the tubeless is not non-expansionist and not conjunctival is right is incorrect it is conjunctival. sent9: if the tubeless is careless it is alterable but not an emetic. sent10: the rock does not flag. sent11: something is alterable if it does flog. sent12: something is not a wireless. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tubeless is careless.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the tubeless is both alterable and not an emetic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the boneset is not a tree.; sent8 & sent2 -> int3: the tubeless is conjunctival.; sent6 -> int4: the dishtowel is a bowline if it is a sulk.; sent4 & sent7 -> int5: the dishtowel does not sentimentalise harmonization.; __UNKNOWN__