the fact that the acanthopterygian is not a moll and not infallible is incorrect.
sent1: if that that either the martinet is not Singhalese or it frolics or both is not correct hold then the seismologist is not a kind of a lapidary. sent2: if the seismologist is a moll the fact that that the acanthopterygian is not a kind of a moll and is not infallible is incorrect is correct. sent3: the vector does temporize if there exists something such that that it is a bitthead and it is not unprintable is wrong. sent4: if the spike is not a documentary then that it is not a present and it does not persuade is not true. sent5: there exists something such that it is a bitthead and it is not unprintable. sent6: the spike is not a documentary if that the vector is shambolic and documentary is not correct. sent7: if the vector temporizes then the seismologist does persuade. sent8: if something does persuade that it is a moll is right. sent9: something is printable and is not a bitthead if it does temporize. sent10: the fact that the vector is shambolic and is not documentary is not correct if there exists something such that it is not lapidary. sent11: the fact that the martinet is not Singhalese and/or it does frolic is wrong. sent12: if something that is a rag is not a kind of a Syngnathidae then the spike does not finalize Karakoram. sent13: something is not a moll and it is not infallible if it does not finalize Karakoram. sent14: that something is a kind of a bitthead and it is unprintable is incorrect if it does not finalize Karakoram. sent15: the fact that something is a bitthead but it is not unprintable is not correct if it does not finalize Karakoram. sent16: the positive is a rag but it is not a kind of a Syngnathidae. sent17: if something is printable and it is not a bitthead then it does not finalize Karakoram.
sent16 -> int1: something is a kind of a rag but it is not a kind of a Syngnathidae.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the spike does not finalize Karakoram.; sent15 -> int3: that the spike is a kind of a bitthead that is not unprintable is wrong if it does not finalize Karakoram.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the spike is a bitthead but it is not unprintable does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is a bitthead and it is not unprintable is not true.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the vector does temporize.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the seismologist persuades.; sent8 -> int8: if the seismologist persuades it is a moll.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the seismologist is a moll.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the acanthopterygian is not a kind of a moll and is not infallible.
sent13 -> int10: the acanthopterygian is not a moll and it is not infallible if it does not finalize Karakoram.; sent17 -> int11: the acanthopterygian does not finalize Karakoram if it is a kind of non-unprintable thing that is not a bitthead.; sent9 -> int12: the acanthopterygian is not unprintable and it is not a bitthead if it does temporize.; sent1 & sent11 -> int13: the seismologist is not a kind of a lapidary.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not a kind of a lapidary.; int14 & sent10 -> int15: the fact that the vector is shambolic but it is not a kind of a documentary does not hold.; sent6 & int15 -> int16: the spike is not documentary.; sent4 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the spike does not present and it does not persuade does not hold.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a present and it does not persuade is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the acanthopterygian is not a moll and not infallible is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that either the martinet is not Singhalese or it frolics or both is not correct hold then the seismologist is not a kind of a lapidary. sent2: if the seismologist is a moll the fact that that the acanthopterygian is not a kind of a moll and is not infallible is incorrect is correct. sent3: the vector does temporize if there exists something such that that it is a bitthead and it is not unprintable is wrong. sent4: if the spike is not a documentary then that it is not a present and it does not persuade is not true. sent5: there exists something such that it is a bitthead and it is not unprintable. sent6: the spike is not a documentary if that the vector is shambolic and documentary is not correct. sent7: if the vector temporizes then the seismologist does persuade. sent8: if something does persuade that it is a moll is right. sent9: something is printable and is not a bitthead if it does temporize. sent10: the fact that the vector is shambolic and is not documentary is not correct if there exists something such that it is not lapidary. sent11: the fact that the martinet is not Singhalese and/or it does frolic is wrong. sent12: if something that is a rag is not a kind of a Syngnathidae then the spike does not finalize Karakoram. sent13: something is not a moll and it is not infallible if it does not finalize Karakoram. sent14: that something is a kind of a bitthead and it is unprintable is incorrect if it does not finalize Karakoram. sent15: the fact that something is a bitthead but it is not unprintable is not correct if it does not finalize Karakoram. sent16: the positive is a rag but it is not a kind of a Syngnathidae. sent17: if something is printable and it is not a bitthead then it does not finalize Karakoram. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: something is a kind of a rag but it is not a kind of a Syngnathidae.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the spike does not finalize Karakoram.; sent15 -> int3: that the spike is a kind of a bitthead that is not unprintable is wrong if it does not finalize Karakoram.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the spike is a bitthead but it is not unprintable does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is a bitthead and it is not unprintable is not true.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the vector does temporize.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the seismologist persuades.; sent8 -> int8: if the seismologist persuades it is a moll.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the seismologist is a moll.; int9 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__