that there exists something such that if it is not a innocency then it is non-classical thing that is not a neurotic is not right.
sent1: if the branchiopod is not a Transvaal it is not emphysematous and is a neurotic. sent2: if the tipper is not a innocency then it is not a kind of a classical and it is not neurotic. sent3: there exists something such that if that it does not lunch necklace is correct then it is arthromeric and it does not tsk. sent4: something is not nonhierarchical and not a gowned if it is not a kind of a TNT.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
the wester is not nonhierarchical and it is not a gowned if it is not a TNT.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a innocency then it is non-classical thing that is not a neurotic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the branchiopod is not a Transvaal it is not emphysematous and is a neurotic. sent2: if the tipper is not a innocency then it is not a kind of a classical and it is not neurotic. sent3: there exists something such that if that it does not lunch necklace is correct then it is arthromeric and it does not tsk. sent4: something is not nonhierarchical and not a gowned if it is not a kind of a TNT. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__