the fact that the yeast does not diffuse libido and is not a Asphodeline is right.
sent1: the receptacle does debrief fluoridation. sent2: the pyrogallol does not broker and is federal if the perphenazine does discount. sent3: there is nothing that discounts and is federal. sent4: if the yeast is a kind of a concertina that is not eccrine it is a kind of a testcross. sent5: if the fact that the pyrogallol does not broker but it is federal is not false then the yeast is not federal. sent6: if there exists something such that it is explicable or it does debrief fluoridation or both the sashimi is not considerate. sent7: if that the yeast does not diffuse libido and it is not a Asphodeline is incorrect then it is not a testcross. sent8: the fact that the yeast does diffuse libido but it is not a Asphodeline is incorrect. sent9: the sweatshirt is not a testcross. sent10: something is a discount if it does retrieve. sent11: the yeast does concert but it is not eccrine. sent12: the perphenazine retrieves if there is something such that that it does not retrieves and it is Judaic is incorrect. sent13: the sashimi is not a concertina if that the receptacle is a kind of a discount and it is federal is not correct. sent14: something is a settle and is not a kind of a Newman if it is not eccrine. sent15: that the zigadene is a concertina or is a kind of a testcross or both is wrong if something is not federal. sent16: the yeast does not diffuse libido and it does not diffuse zigadene. sent17: that something does not retrieve and is Judaic is not right if it is not considerate. sent18: if that something is either a concertina or a testcross or both does not hold it is not eccrine. sent19: if something does not concert then the perphenazine is not eccrine and/or is a testcross.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the yeast does not diffuse libido and is not a kind of a Asphodeline does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the yeast is not a kind of a testcross.; sent4 & sent11 -> int2: that the yeast is a testcross is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the yeast does not diffuse libido and it is not a kind of a Asphodeline is not right.
sent3 -> int4: that the receptacle does discount and it is federal is not true.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: that the sashimi does not concert is right.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that the fact that it does concert is not wrong is not true.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the perphenazine is not eccrine and/or it is a testcross.; int7 -> int8: something is not eccrine and/or it is a testcross.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the yeast does not diffuse libido and is not a Asphodeline is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the receptacle does debrief fluoridation. sent2: the pyrogallol does not broker and is federal if the perphenazine does discount. sent3: there is nothing that discounts and is federal. sent4: if the yeast is a kind of a concertina that is not eccrine it is a kind of a testcross. sent5: if the fact that the pyrogallol does not broker but it is federal is not false then the yeast is not federal. sent6: if there exists something such that it is explicable or it does debrief fluoridation or both the sashimi is not considerate. sent7: if that the yeast does not diffuse libido and it is not a Asphodeline is incorrect then it is not a testcross. sent8: the fact that the yeast does diffuse libido but it is not a Asphodeline is incorrect. sent9: the sweatshirt is not a testcross. sent10: something is a discount if it does retrieve. sent11: the yeast does concert but it is not eccrine. sent12: the perphenazine retrieves if there is something such that that it does not retrieves and it is Judaic is incorrect. sent13: the sashimi is not a concertina if that the receptacle is a kind of a discount and it is federal is not correct. sent14: something is a settle and is not a kind of a Newman if it is not eccrine. sent15: that the zigadene is a concertina or is a kind of a testcross or both is wrong if something is not federal. sent16: the yeast does not diffuse libido and it does not diffuse zigadene. sent17: that something does not retrieve and is Judaic is not right if it is not considerate. sent18: if that something is either a concertina or a testcross or both does not hold it is not eccrine. sent19: if something does not concert then the perphenazine is not eccrine and/or is a testcross. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the yeast does not diffuse libido and is not a kind of a Asphodeline does not hold.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the yeast is not a kind of a testcross.; sent4 & sent11 -> int2: that the yeast is a testcross is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__