that there is something such that if it is not unconstitutional or it does not scent SIGINT or both then it is glial is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if either it does not scent skill or it is not irremovable or both then it is virological. sent2: something is not non-geopolitical if it does not aberrate and/or it does not total. sent3: if the duchy is not a kind of an amplification and/or does not service curvature then it is unconstitutional. sent4: if the adductor does not photocopy and/or it does not scent SIGINT it farts. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a newton then the fact that it does understand is true. sent6: there exists something such that if it is an age and/or not a Louisianan it is psycholinguistic. sent7: the adductor is glial if it is not unconstitutional. sent8: there is something such that if it is not unconstitutional then the fact that it is glial is not wrong. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not unconstitutional or it does scent SIGINT or both then it is glial. sent10: that there is something such that if it is not orthoptic it compels bulla is true. sent11: something is a kind of a Cacajao if either it does not reorganize or it does not compel osteotomy or both. sent12: something does scent collateral if it either is not brazen or is not untraceable or both. sent13: there is something such that if it is unconstitutional and/or does not scent SIGINT then it is glial. sent14: if the fact that the adductor is not a kind of a Wuhan is not incorrect the fact that it scents SIGINT is not false. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not scent quadric then it is declarative. sent16: the adductor is glial if it is not unconstitutional and/or does not scent SIGINT. sent17: the fact that the sangapenum is a Campeche is not wrong if it is not a Wuhan and/or it is not glial. sent18: if the adductor is not a Seanad it is hermeneutic. sent19: there is something such that if it does not scent SIGINT then it is glial. sent20: if either the adductor is not unconstitutional or it scents SIGINT or both it is glial.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if either it does not aberrate or it does not total or both then it is geopolitical.
sent2 -> int1: the friedcake is geopolitical if it does not aberrate and/or it does not total.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not unconstitutional or it does not scent SIGINT or both then it is glial is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if either it does not scent skill or it is not irremovable or both then it is virological. sent2: something is not non-geopolitical if it does not aberrate and/or it does not total. sent3: if the duchy is not a kind of an amplification and/or does not service curvature then it is unconstitutional. sent4: if the adductor does not photocopy and/or it does not scent SIGINT it farts. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a newton then the fact that it does understand is true. sent6: there exists something such that if it is an age and/or not a Louisianan it is psycholinguistic. sent7: the adductor is glial if it is not unconstitutional. sent8: there is something such that if it is not unconstitutional then the fact that it is glial is not wrong. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not unconstitutional or it does scent SIGINT or both then it is glial. sent10: that there is something such that if it is not orthoptic it compels bulla is true. sent11: something is a kind of a Cacajao if either it does not reorganize or it does not compel osteotomy or both. sent12: something does scent collateral if it either is not brazen or is not untraceable or both. sent13: there is something such that if it is unconstitutional and/or does not scent SIGINT then it is glial. sent14: if the fact that the adductor is not a kind of a Wuhan is not incorrect the fact that it scents SIGINT is not false. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not scent quadric then it is declarative. sent16: the adductor is glial if it is not unconstitutional and/or does not scent SIGINT. sent17: the fact that the sangapenum is a Campeche is not wrong if it is not a Wuhan and/or it is not glial. sent18: if the adductor is not a Seanad it is hermeneutic. sent19: there is something such that if it does not scent SIGINT then it is glial. sent20: if either the adductor is not unconstitutional or it scents SIGINT or both it is glial. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__