the gusher is a Orizaba.
sent1: there is nothing such that the fact that it is a kind of a abdominousness and it is a kind of an amalgamation is correct. sent2: if the gusher is not a surveillance then it is not a kind of a Orizaba. sent3: if there is something such that it is an amalgamation the nutrition is a Orizaba. sent4: the fact that the gusher is a Orizaba is not false if there is something such that the fact that it is not a abdominousness and it is an amalgamation is not right. sent5: there exists nothing such that the fact that it does not average slub and does dart balkiness is right. sent6: there exists nothing that is both not a abdominousness and an amalgamation.
sent6 -> int1: that the nutrition is not a abdominousness but it is an amalgamation is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a abdominousness and it is an amalgamation is false.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the gusher is not a Orizaba.
$hypothesis$ = the gusher is a Orizaba. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that the fact that it is a kind of a abdominousness and it is a kind of an amalgamation is correct. sent2: if the gusher is not a surveillance then it is not a kind of a Orizaba. sent3: if there is something such that it is an amalgamation the nutrition is a Orizaba. sent4: the fact that the gusher is a Orizaba is not false if there is something such that the fact that it is not a abdominousness and it is an amalgamation is not right. sent5: there exists nothing such that the fact that it does not average slub and does dart balkiness is right. sent6: there exists nothing that is both not a abdominousness and an amalgamation. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: that the nutrition is not a abdominousness but it is an amalgamation is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a abdominousness and it is an amalgamation is false.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__