the fact that the Kali is not a kind of a basics or it does enliven elapid or both is not correct.
sent1: the franklin is not a steam. sent2: if the franklin does not steam then the tapster is not anginal. sent3: the companionway does not enliven elapid if there is something such that the fact that it is a Hieracium or not a porcupines or both is incorrect. sent4: that something is a kind of a Hieracium but it is not a porcupines is not right if it does not moonshine. sent5: if something does not enliven Chapman it is not a Hieracium. sent6: if the Kali does not enliven elapid either the ivory is not a Hieracium or it does enliven elapid or both. sent7: that the Kali is a basics and/or it does enliven elapid if the companionway does not enliven elapid is right. sent8: if that something does steam is correct that it is non-basics or enlivens elapid or both is false. sent9: the fact that something either is a kind of a Hieracium or is not a porcupines or both is wrong if it does not enliven Chapman. sent10: the ivory is not a Hieracium. sent11: if the tapster is not anginal then the ivory does not enliven Chapman. sent12: if the companionway does not enliven elapid then the Kali is not a basics or does enliven elapid or both. sent13: the Kali is a steam and it is anginal if the franklin does not enliven Chapman. sent14: the companionway is not supervisory. sent15: if the ivory does not enliven Chapman it is not a Hieracium. sent16: there is something such that it is a kind of a porcupines.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the tapster is not anginal.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the ivory does not enliven Chapman.; sent9 -> int3: that the ivory is a Hieracium and/or not a porcupines is incorrect if it does not enliven Chapman.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that either the ivory is a kind of a Hieracium or it is not a porcupines or both does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Hieracium and/or it is not a kind of a porcupines is wrong.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the companionway does not enliven elapid.; int6 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the Kali is not a basics and/or it enlivens elapid is not true is correct.
sent8 -> int7: if the Kali is a steam then that it is non-basics and/or it does enliven elapid does not hold.; sent4 -> int8: if the tapster is not a kind of a moonshine the fact that it is a kind of a Hieracium and is not a kind of a porcupines is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Kali is not a kind of a basics or it does enliven elapid or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the franklin is not a steam. sent2: if the franklin does not steam then the tapster is not anginal. sent3: the companionway does not enliven elapid if there is something such that the fact that it is a Hieracium or not a porcupines or both is incorrect. sent4: that something is a kind of a Hieracium but it is not a porcupines is not right if it does not moonshine. sent5: if something does not enliven Chapman it is not a Hieracium. sent6: if the Kali does not enliven elapid either the ivory is not a Hieracium or it does enliven elapid or both. sent7: that the Kali is a basics and/or it does enliven elapid if the companionway does not enliven elapid is right. sent8: if that something does steam is correct that it is non-basics or enlivens elapid or both is false. sent9: the fact that something either is a kind of a Hieracium or is not a porcupines or both is wrong if it does not enliven Chapman. sent10: the ivory is not a Hieracium. sent11: if the tapster is not anginal then the ivory does not enliven Chapman. sent12: if the companionway does not enliven elapid then the Kali is not a basics or does enliven elapid or both. sent13: the Kali is a steam and it is anginal if the franklin does not enliven Chapman. sent14: the companionway is not supervisory. sent15: if the ivory does not enliven Chapman it is not a Hieracium. sent16: there is something such that it is a kind of a porcupines. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the tapster is not anginal.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the ivory does not enliven Chapman.; sent9 -> int3: that the ivory is a Hieracium and/or not a porcupines is incorrect if it does not enliven Chapman.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that either the ivory is a kind of a Hieracium or it is not a porcupines or both does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Hieracium and/or it is not a kind of a porcupines is wrong.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the companionway does not enliven elapid.; int6 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__