the tetracaine is a kind of a semasiology.
sent1: the tetracaine is not a kind of a semasiology if the haplosporidian does not space rum. sent2: something is not a honeydew. sent3: the tetracaine does not space rum and/or it is not acceptive if something is not a semasiology. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Erin and/or it does not interpret lee is not true then the tetracaine is contractual. sent5: the haplosporidian spaces rum and/or is not acceptive if something does not honey. sent6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a honeydew. sent7: something does not space rum if the fact that it is acceptive and it is not a kind of a honeydew is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that it is not a kind of a semasiology. sent9: the haplosporidian does not space rum and/or is not acceptive if there exists something such that it does not honey. sent10: the haplosporidian does not space rum and/or it is not a semasiology. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a semasiology is right. sent12: the tetracaine is not a semasiology and/or it is acceptive if there is something such that it does not space rum. sent13: if something is not a honeydew it is a semasiology. sent14: the fact that the haplosporidian is not a Erin but contractual is not right. sent15: the fact that the gig is a kind of a Erin or does not interpret lee or both does not hold. sent16: the tetracaine does not space rum and/or it is a semasiology. sent17: if there is something such that that it is not acceptive is correct then the haplosporidian does not space rum or it is not a semasiology or both. sent18: that something does not space rum and is acceptive is not true if it is not contractual. sent19: if the haplosporidian does not space rum and/or it is not acceptive then the tetracaine is not a kind of a semasiology. sent20: the haplosporidian either spaces rum or is not acceptive or both. sent21: the haplosporidian is not a kind of a Hull. sent22: the tetracaine is not acceptive. sent23: there exists something such that it is acceptive.
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the haplosporidian does not space rum and/or is not acceptive is not false.; int1 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the ala does not space rum.
sent7 -> int2: if the ala is acceptive but it does not honey it does not space rum.; sent15 -> int3: there is something such that that either it is a Erin or it does not interpret lee or both is wrong.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the tetracaine is contractual.; int4 -> int5: there are contractual things.;
$hypothesis$ = the tetracaine is a kind of a semasiology. ; $context$ = sent1: the tetracaine is not a kind of a semasiology if the haplosporidian does not space rum. sent2: something is not a honeydew. sent3: the tetracaine does not space rum and/or it is not acceptive if something is not a semasiology. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is a Erin and/or it does not interpret lee is not true then the tetracaine is contractual. sent5: the haplosporidian spaces rum and/or is not acceptive if something does not honey. sent6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a honeydew. sent7: something does not space rum if the fact that it is acceptive and it is not a kind of a honeydew is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that it is not a kind of a semasiology. sent9: the haplosporidian does not space rum and/or is not acceptive if there exists something such that it does not honey. sent10: the haplosporidian does not space rum and/or it is not a semasiology. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a semasiology is right. sent12: the tetracaine is not a semasiology and/or it is acceptive if there is something such that it does not space rum. sent13: if something is not a honeydew it is a semasiology. sent14: the fact that the haplosporidian is not a Erin but contractual is not right. sent15: the fact that the gig is a kind of a Erin or does not interpret lee or both does not hold. sent16: the tetracaine does not space rum and/or it is a semasiology. sent17: if there is something such that that it is not acceptive is correct then the haplosporidian does not space rum or it is not a semasiology or both. sent18: that something does not space rum and is acceptive is not true if it is not contractual. sent19: if the haplosporidian does not space rum and/or it is not acceptive then the tetracaine is not a kind of a semasiology. sent20: the haplosporidian either spaces rum or is not acceptive or both. sent21: the haplosporidian is not a kind of a Hull. sent22: the tetracaine is not acceptive. sent23: there exists something such that it is acceptive. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the haplosporidian does not space rum and/or is not acceptive is not false.; int1 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__