the fact that the repressing sluggard does not occur if the minimization does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the fact that both the repressing sluggard and the minimization happens is not wrong is wrong. sent2: that the crocheting does not occur results in that both the artifactualness and the quartering occurs. sent3: that the repressing sluggard but not the minimization happens is not true. sent4: that both the festival and the Mandaeanness happens is caused by the non-phonologicalness. sent5: the demonetization does not occur. sent6: both the ponderableness and the non-phonologicalness occurs if the anisogamicness happens. sent7: that the detection does not occur and/or the defloration does not occur does not hold if the artifactualness happens. sent8: the catechisticness happens but the adnateness does not occur. sent9: that the sampling mendelevium does not occur causes that the instilling and the rising occurs. sent10: the anisogamicness occurs if the instilling happens. sent11: if that the detection does not occur or the defloration does not occur or both is wrong that the minimization occurs hold. sent12: that not the repressing Goldsmith but the repressing sluggard happens is triggered by the minimization. sent13: the repressing sluggard does not occur if the minimization happens. sent14: the crocheting does not occur if the Mandaean occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the repressing sluggard happens is not wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the minimization does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the repressing sluggard happens and the minimization does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the repressing sluggard does not occur hold.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the repressing Goldsmith does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the repressing sluggard does not occur if the minimization does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that both the repressing sluggard and the minimization happens is not wrong is wrong. sent2: that the crocheting does not occur results in that both the artifactualness and the quartering occurs. sent3: that the repressing sluggard but not the minimization happens is not true. sent4: that both the festival and the Mandaeanness happens is caused by the non-phonologicalness. sent5: the demonetization does not occur. sent6: both the ponderableness and the non-phonologicalness occurs if the anisogamicness happens. sent7: that the detection does not occur and/or the defloration does not occur does not hold if the artifactualness happens. sent8: the catechisticness happens but the adnateness does not occur. sent9: that the sampling mendelevium does not occur causes that the instilling and the rising occurs. sent10: the anisogamicness occurs if the instilling happens. sent11: if that the detection does not occur or the defloration does not occur or both is wrong that the minimization occurs hold. sent12: that not the repressing Goldsmith but the repressing sluggard happens is triggered by the minimization. sent13: the repressing sluggard does not occur if the minimization happens. sent14: the crocheting does not occur if the Mandaean occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the repressing sluggard happens is not wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the minimization does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the repressing sluggard happens and the minimization does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the repressing sluggard does not occur hold.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__