the NMR is not non-alphabetic.
sent1: the fact that the NMR is a periodical and it does style sheepshank is not correct. sent2: the NMR is a periodical if the hit is not a periodical. sent3: if the hit is not a periodical then the NMR is alphabetic and is a periodical. sent4: that the hit is not a periodical is not wrong if it does not style fill. sent5: the fact that the hit is not a kind of a novelist is not incorrect. sent6: the dibranchiate is a kind of a periodical. sent7: the hit is not a periodical if that it styles fill and styles sheepshank is not true. sent8: the fact that the NMR does style fill and it is a kind of a periodical is not right. sent9: the fact that the sowbread styles fill hold. sent10: something is non-alphabetic if it is a Acanthopterygii. sent11: the NMR is a kind of a periodical. sent12: that the dope is a periodical hold. sent13: the fact that the NMR styles sheepshank and it is a kind of a periodical does not hold. sent14: the hit does style fill and is alphabetic. sent15: the fact that something does not synthesize hit is true if it is a people. sent16: something is a Acanthopterygii that is a kind of a periodical if it does not synthesize hit. sent17: that the NMR is a tout and it preaches does not hold if the hit is not a Acanthopterygii. sent18: the doge does not mellow Bangladesh if it is not a periodical. sent19: the hit is alphabetic. sent20: the NMR is a twopence.
that the NMR is not alphabetic hold.
sent10 -> int1: if the NMR is a Acanthopterygii then it is not alphabetic.; sent16 -> int2: the NMR is a Acanthopterygii and it is a kind of a periodical if it does not synthesize hit.; sent15 -> int3: if the NMR peoples then it does not synthesize hit.;
$hypothesis$ = the NMR is not non-alphabetic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the NMR is a periodical and it does style sheepshank is not correct. sent2: the NMR is a periodical if the hit is not a periodical. sent3: if the hit is not a periodical then the NMR is alphabetic and is a periodical. sent4: that the hit is not a periodical is not wrong if it does not style fill. sent5: the fact that the hit is not a kind of a novelist is not incorrect. sent6: the dibranchiate is a kind of a periodical. sent7: the hit is not a periodical if that it styles fill and styles sheepshank is not true. sent8: the fact that the NMR does style fill and it is a kind of a periodical is not right. sent9: the fact that the sowbread styles fill hold. sent10: something is non-alphabetic if it is a Acanthopterygii. sent11: the NMR is a kind of a periodical. sent12: that the dope is a periodical hold. sent13: the fact that the NMR styles sheepshank and it is a kind of a periodical does not hold. sent14: the hit does style fill and is alphabetic. sent15: the fact that something does not synthesize hit is true if it is a people. sent16: something is a Acanthopterygii that is a kind of a periodical if it does not synthesize hit. sent17: that the NMR is a tout and it preaches does not hold if the hit is not a Acanthopterygii. sent18: the doge does not mellow Bangladesh if it is not a periodical. sent19: the hit is alphabetic. sent20: the NMR is a twopence. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__