the Chuvash does not slice Nobelist.
sent1: that something is unseductive thing that is a leporide is not true if it does not slice spectacles. sent2: if the plane does behave the lasso is a taps. sent3: if something is a kind of a taps but it is not a genome then it does not slice Nobelist. sent4: the islander does not slice spectacles and it is not chancrous. sent5: the fact that the Chuvash is both a taps and not a genome if the scriptwriter is a kind of a taps is not wrong. sent6: that something is a taps and it slices spectacles is not correct if it does not fingerprint galoot. sent7: the islander is a taps but it is not chancrous if the Chuvash taps. sent8: if something does not slice spectacles the fact that it is a Coregonus and is a turnaround is not correct. sent9: the scriptwriter is a taps and does not fingerprint galoot if the lasso taps. sent10: the islander taps if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Coregonus. sent11: there exists something such that that it is both chancrous and a taps is not incorrect.
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the islander is a Coregonus and is a turnaround is false if it does not slice spectacles.; sent4 -> int2: the islander does not slice spectacles.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the islander is a Coregonus and a turnaround does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a Coregonus and is a turnaround is not true.; sent3 -> int5: the Chuvash does not slice Nobelist if it is a taps and not a genome.;
there exists something such that the fact that it is unseductive and it is a leporide is false.
sent1 -> int6: the fact that the plane is unseductive and it is a leporide is not true if it does not slice spectacles.;
$hypothesis$ = the Chuvash does not slice Nobelist. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is unseductive thing that is a leporide is not true if it does not slice spectacles. sent2: if the plane does behave the lasso is a taps. sent3: if something is a kind of a taps but it is not a genome then it does not slice Nobelist. sent4: the islander does not slice spectacles and it is not chancrous. sent5: the fact that the Chuvash is both a taps and not a genome if the scriptwriter is a kind of a taps is not wrong. sent6: that something is a taps and it slices spectacles is not correct if it does not fingerprint galoot. sent7: the islander is a taps but it is not chancrous if the Chuvash taps. sent8: if something does not slice spectacles the fact that it is a Coregonus and is a turnaround is not correct. sent9: the scriptwriter is a taps and does not fingerprint galoot if the lasso taps. sent10: the islander taps if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Coregonus. sent11: there exists something such that that it is both chancrous and a taps is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the islander is a Coregonus and is a turnaround is false if it does not slice spectacles.; sent4 -> int2: the islander does not slice spectacles.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the islander is a Coregonus and a turnaround does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a Coregonus and is a turnaround is not true.; sent3 -> int5: the Chuvash does not slice Nobelist if it is a taps and not a genome.; __UNKNOWN__