the fact that the Venetian leads to that the disentangling Davys occurs is false.
sent1: the fact that the disentangling Davys happens is not wrong if the radioactiveness does not occur. sent2: that the unintelligibleness happens is correct if the Venetianness does not occur. sent3: that both the dot-comness and the payoff occurs is brought about by that the browse does not occur. sent4: if that the visitation does not occur and the disentangling Davys occurs does not hold the disentangling Davys does not occur. sent5: if the Venetian occurs the fawn happens but the gratification does not occur. sent6: the nonreturnableness does not occur. sent7: that the radioactiveness does not occur is brought about by that the fawning occurs but the gratification does not occur. sent8: that the Darwinian does not occur is caused by that the chandelling happens and the filing occurs. sent9: if the motorization and the green occurs then the assent does not occur. sent10: if that the Darwinianness does not occur and the spark does not occur is not true then the browse does not occur. sent11: the ugliness but not the leaving happens. sent12: the fact that not the visitation but the disentangling Davys occurs does not hold if the dot-comness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Venetianness occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fawn occurs but the gratification does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the radioactiveness does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the disentangling Davys happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the unintelligibleness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Venetian leads to that the disentangling Davys occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the disentangling Davys happens is not wrong if the radioactiveness does not occur. sent2: that the unintelligibleness happens is correct if the Venetianness does not occur. sent3: that both the dot-comness and the payoff occurs is brought about by that the browse does not occur. sent4: if that the visitation does not occur and the disentangling Davys occurs does not hold the disentangling Davys does not occur. sent5: if the Venetian occurs the fawn happens but the gratification does not occur. sent6: the nonreturnableness does not occur. sent7: that the radioactiveness does not occur is brought about by that the fawning occurs but the gratification does not occur. sent8: that the Darwinian does not occur is caused by that the chandelling happens and the filing occurs. sent9: if the motorization and the green occurs then the assent does not occur. sent10: if that the Darwinianness does not occur and the spark does not occur is not true then the browse does not occur. sent11: the ugliness but not the leaving happens. sent12: the fact that not the visitation but the disentangling Davys occurs does not hold if the dot-comness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Venetianness occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fawn occurs but the gratification does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the radioactiveness does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the disentangling Davys happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__