the fact that the timekeeper is not a lexeme and is not a Rwandan is not correct.
sent1: if that something is a Tenebrionidae hold then it is protozoological. sent2: that if the rouge is a kind of a volatile then the fact that that the fugleman is a kind of a volatile but it is not a lexeme is not false is false is correct. sent3: if the blackcap is canonic then that it is not Monacan and is not a kind of a dash does not hold. sent4: that the fugleman is not volatile and it is not a tintack is incorrect if that it is protozoological is not false. sent5: if something is a robalo it is canonic. sent6: if the rouge is a kind of a lexeme that the timekeeper is not a lexeme and not Rwandan is false. sent7: the fugleman is not a volatile. sent8: the fugleman is not a tintack. sent9: if something is a dash it is a lexeme. sent10: there exists something such that it is a futurology. sent11: if the fugleman does not dash then it is not a Tenebrionidae and it does not lysogenize memo. sent12: something is not a lexeme and it is not a Rwandan if it is protozoological. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a futurology is not false then the blackcap punts and it is a robalo. sent14: something is protozoological if it is a tintack. sent15: the fugleman does not lysogenize memo if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-Monacan thing that is not a dash does not hold. sent16: the rouge does lysogenize memo if the blackcap is not a Tenebrionidae. sent17: the timekeeper is not a dash and it is not Rwandan. sent18: something does dash if it does lysogenize memo. sent19: the blackcap is not a Tenebrionidae if the fugleman is not protozoological. sent20: the fugleman is intracranial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fugleman is protozoological.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the fugleman is not a volatile and it is not a kind of a tintack is wrong.; sent7 & sent8 -> int2: the fugleman is not a volatile and it is not a tintack.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fugleman is not protozoological.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the blackcap is not a Tenebrionidae.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the rouge does lysogenize memo.; sent18 -> int7: the rouge dashes if it lysogenizes memo.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the rouge is a dash.; sent9 -> int9: if the rouge dashes that it is a lexeme is not incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the rouge is a kind of a lexeme.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the rouge is not a tintack.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the timekeeper is not a lexeme and is not a Rwandan is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a Tenebrionidae hold then it is protozoological. sent2: that if the rouge is a kind of a volatile then the fact that that the fugleman is a kind of a volatile but it is not a lexeme is not false is false is correct. sent3: if the blackcap is canonic then that it is not Monacan and is not a kind of a dash does not hold. sent4: that the fugleman is not volatile and it is not a tintack is incorrect if that it is protozoological is not false. sent5: if something is a robalo it is canonic. sent6: if the rouge is a kind of a lexeme that the timekeeper is not a lexeme and not Rwandan is false. sent7: the fugleman is not a volatile. sent8: the fugleman is not a tintack. sent9: if something is a dash it is a lexeme. sent10: there exists something such that it is a futurology. sent11: if the fugleman does not dash then it is not a Tenebrionidae and it does not lysogenize memo. sent12: something is not a lexeme and it is not a Rwandan if it is protozoological. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a futurology is not false then the blackcap punts and it is a robalo. sent14: something is protozoological if it is a tintack. sent15: the fugleman does not lysogenize memo if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-Monacan thing that is not a dash does not hold. sent16: the rouge does lysogenize memo if the blackcap is not a Tenebrionidae. sent17: the timekeeper is not a dash and it is not Rwandan. sent18: something does dash if it does lysogenize memo. sent19: the blackcap is not a Tenebrionidae if the fugleman is not protozoological. sent20: the fugleman is intracranial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fugleman is protozoological.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the fugleman is not a volatile and it is not a kind of a tintack is wrong.; sent7 & sent8 -> int2: the fugleman is not a volatile and it is not a tintack.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fugleman is not protozoological.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the blackcap is not a Tenebrionidae.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the rouge does lysogenize memo.; sent18 -> int7: the rouge dashes if it lysogenizes memo.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the rouge is a dash.; sent9 -> int9: if the rouge dashes that it is a lexeme is not incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the rouge is a kind of a lexeme.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__