the chopsteak is not a marsupial or it is a Dracocephalum or both.
sent1: the fact that something is not centroidal and/or is electoral is not right if it is nidicolous. sent2: something that is not a kind of a Midway either does not deactivate hug-me-tight or is not cyclothymic or both. sent3: the chopsteak is a marsupial. sent4: if the fact that something is a marsupial or is a Dracocephalum or both is wrong then it is electoral. sent5: the baptistry is not a kind of a Midway if that the bloomers is both a Midway and not a demyelination is not right. sent6: something that is not a demyelination is a pseudoscience. sent7: if that the chopsteak is a marsupial or is a Dracocephalum or both is not true it is electoral. sent8: something is flowery and nidicolous if it does not deactivate hug-me-tight. sent9: the fact that the eavesdropper is not a molter and/or it is electoral is false. sent10: that the earthworm is a kind of a fuddy-duddy and it does confederate bloomers is not right. sent11: if something does not deactivate hug-me-tight and/or is not cyclothymic it does not deactivate hug-me-tight. sent12: if the fact that something is either not marsupial or a Dracocephalum or both is not correct it is electoral. sent13: the fact that the fact that the bloomers is a kind of a Midway that is not a demyelination is not true hold if the ambulatory is a kind of a pseudoscience. sent14: that the chopsteak is not a marsupial and/or it is a Dracocephalum is not right if the bloomers is not nidicolous. sent15: something is flowery if it does not deactivate hug-me-tight and it is cyclothymic. sent16: the harasser does not deactivate hug-me-tight and is cyclothymic if it is a Midway. sent17: the fact that the harasser is a Midway is true if that the Flagstaff is a pseudoscience is right. sent18: if the harasser is flowery that the ambulatory is not electoral and is nidicolous does not hold. sent19: the chopsteak is not electoral. sent20: either the chopsteak is a kind of a marsupial or it is a Dracocephalum or both.
sent12 -> int1: if that that the chopsteak is non-marsupial and/or a Dracocephalum is true is wrong then it is electoral.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chopsteak is not marsupial or is a kind of a Dracocephalum or both does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the chopsteak is electoral.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the baptistry is not centroidal and/or it is electoral is not correct.
sent1 -> int4: the fact that the baptistry is not centroidal and/or it is electoral is not true if it is nidicolous.; sent8 -> int5: if the baptistry does not deactivate hug-me-tight then it is a kind of flowery thing that is not non-nidicolous.; sent11 -> int6: if either the baptistry does not deactivate hug-me-tight or it is not cyclothymic or both it does not deactivate hug-me-tight.; sent2 -> int7: either the baptistry does not deactivate hug-me-tight or it is not cyclothymic or both if it is not a kind of a Midway.;
$hypothesis$ = the chopsteak is not a marsupial or it is a Dracocephalum or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not centroidal and/or is electoral is not right if it is nidicolous. sent2: something that is not a kind of a Midway either does not deactivate hug-me-tight or is not cyclothymic or both. sent3: the chopsteak is a marsupial. sent4: if the fact that something is a marsupial or is a Dracocephalum or both is wrong then it is electoral. sent5: the baptistry is not a kind of a Midway if that the bloomers is both a Midway and not a demyelination is not right. sent6: something that is not a demyelination is a pseudoscience. sent7: if that the chopsteak is a marsupial or is a Dracocephalum or both is not true it is electoral. sent8: something is flowery and nidicolous if it does not deactivate hug-me-tight. sent9: the fact that the eavesdropper is not a molter and/or it is electoral is false. sent10: that the earthworm is a kind of a fuddy-duddy and it does confederate bloomers is not right. sent11: if something does not deactivate hug-me-tight and/or is not cyclothymic it does not deactivate hug-me-tight. sent12: if the fact that something is either not marsupial or a Dracocephalum or both is not correct it is electoral. sent13: the fact that the fact that the bloomers is a kind of a Midway that is not a demyelination is not true hold if the ambulatory is a kind of a pseudoscience. sent14: that the chopsteak is not a marsupial and/or it is a Dracocephalum is not right if the bloomers is not nidicolous. sent15: something is flowery if it does not deactivate hug-me-tight and it is cyclothymic. sent16: the harasser does not deactivate hug-me-tight and is cyclothymic if it is a Midway. sent17: the fact that the harasser is a Midway is true if that the Flagstaff is a pseudoscience is right. sent18: if the harasser is flowery that the ambulatory is not electoral and is nidicolous does not hold. sent19: the chopsteak is not electoral. sent20: either the chopsteak is a kind of a marsupial or it is a Dracocephalum or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if that that the chopsteak is non-marsupial and/or a Dracocephalum is true is wrong then it is electoral.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chopsteak is not marsupial or is a kind of a Dracocephalum or both does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the chopsteak is electoral.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__