the adjoining 401-k does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the vibration does not occur but the donating happens is not right if the piping occurs. sent2: if that the discontinuance occurs and the remodeling panhandler does not occur is wrong then the discontinuance does not occur. sent3: both the condensate and the nonhierarchicalness occurs. sent4: the unstatesmanlikeness happens. sent5: the adjoining 401-k but not the uncertainness happens if the fact that the unstatesmanlikeness does not occur is not true. sent6: the fact that the discontinuance occurs but the remodeling panhandler does not occur is wrong if the fact that the oddness occurs hold. sent7: the unstatesmanlikeness does not occur and the sow does not occur if the zymoidness does not occur. sent8: if that that not the vibration but the donating occurs is wrong hold the cracking does not occur. sent9: if the unstatesmanlikeness does not occur and the sow does not occur then the adjoining 401-k does not occur. sent10: that the oddness does not occur is prevented by the non-cognitiveness and/or the remodeling Milhaud. sent11: that not the radiographicness but the zymoidness happens does not hold if the cracking does not occur. sent12: if the discontinuance does not occur the non-asceticness and the piping occurs. sent13: the zymoidness does not occur if the fact that both the non-radiographicness and the zymoidness happens is incorrect.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the adjoining 401-k and the non-uncertainness happens.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the adjoining 401-k does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the adjoining 401-k does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the vibration does not occur but the donating happens is not right if the piping occurs. sent2: if that the discontinuance occurs and the remodeling panhandler does not occur is wrong then the discontinuance does not occur. sent3: both the condensate and the nonhierarchicalness occurs. sent4: the unstatesmanlikeness happens. sent5: the adjoining 401-k but not the uncertainness happens if the fact that the unstatesmanlikeness does not occur is not true. sent6: the fact that the discontinuance occurs but the remodeling panhandler does not occur is wrong if the fact that the oddness occurs hold. sent7: the unstatesmanlikeness does not occur and the sow does not occur if the zymoidness does not occur. sent8: if that that not the vibration but the donating occurs is wrong hold the cracking does not occur. sent9: if the unstatesmanlikeness does not occur and the sow does not occur then the adjoining 401-k does not occur. sent10: that the oddness does not occur is prevented by the non-cognitiveness and/or the remodeling Milhaud. sent11: that not the radiographicness but the zymoidness happens does not hold if the cracking does not occur. sent12: if the discontinuance does not occur the non-asceticness and the piping occurs. sent13: the zymoidness does not occur if the fact that both the non-radiographicness and the zymoidness happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the adjoining 401-k and the non-uncertainness happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__