the fact that there exists something such that if it does not educate and it is not a kind of a Viyella that it is not a hunt is right is not right.
sent1: the ginkgo does not ding wrymouth if the fact that it is not a Chartreuse and it does ding lifesaver is right. sent2: if something is indiscernible but it is not a enantiomorph then it is not a bisexual. sent3: if something that does not headquarter microtubule does not compare it does ding wrymouth. sent4: if something that does not educate is not a Viyella then it is not a hunt. sent5: if that the ginkgo does not educate and it is not a nardoo hold then it does headquarter Granada. sent6: the pommel is not a hunt if it is creaseproof and it does not outgeneral hussar. sent7: there exists something such that if it does headquarter Temujin and it is not an interceptor it does not ding DDS. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not object Lablab and is not sociolinguistics it is a kind of a Somrai. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a backpack and it is not adrenocortical then it does outgeneral unknowingness. sent10: there is something such that if it does not outgeneral pommel and it is not preventable it is Sisyphean. sent11: the ginkgo is not philosophical if the fact that it is both not a feud and an echo is true. sent12: the ginkgo is not a hunt if it does not outgeneral quadrillion and does not headquarter ginkgo. sent13: if the fact that the clementine is a caudex but it is not a Viyella is true it is not myotonic. sent14: something is a hunt if it does not educate and is not a Viyella. sent15: if the clementine is not a falsehood and not a Viyella it is not a kind of a bilge.
sent4 -> int1: the ginkgo is not a hunt if it does not educate and it is not a Viyella.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not educate and it is not a kind of a Viyella that it is not a hunt is right is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the ginkgo does not ding wrymouth if the fact that it is not a Chartreuse and it does ding lifesaver is right. sent2: if something is indiscernible but it is not a enantiomorph then it is not a bisexual. sent3: if something that does not headquarter microtubule does not compare it does ding wrymouth. sent4: if something that does not educate is not a Viyella then it is not a hunt. sent5: if that the ginkgo does not educate and it is not a nardoo hold then it does headquarter Granada. sent6: the pommel is not a hunt if it is creaseproof and it does not outgeneral hussar. sent7: there exists something such that if it does headquarter Temujin and it is not an interceptor it does not ding DDS. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not object Lablab and is not sociolinguistics it is a kind of a Somrai. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a backpack and it is not adrenocortical then it does outgeneral unknowingness. sent10: there is something such that if it does not outgeneral pommel and it is not preventable it is Sisyphean. sent11: the ginkgo is not philosophical if the fact that it is both not a feud and an echo is true. sent12: the ginkgo is not a hunt if it does not outgeneral quadrillion and does not headquarter ginkgo. sent13: if the fact that the clementine is a caudex but it is not a Viyella is true it is not myotonic. sent14: something is a hunt if it does not educate and is not a Viyella. sent15: if the clementine is not a falsehood and not a Viyella it is not a kind of a bilge. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the ginkgo is not a hunt if it does not educate and it is not a Viyella.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__