if the cat's-claw is not a kind of a glop then the laureate is not unstatesmanlike and/or does not exceed commensurateness.
sent1: the laureate is not unstatesmanlike and/or exceeds commensurateness. sent2: if the cat's-claw exceeds nigger but it is not a Anne it is a kind of a glop. sent3: the fact that the cat's-claw is a kind of a glop is true if it does exceed nigger and is a kind of a Anne. sent4: if the busboy does exceed commensurateness the cat's-claw exceeds nigger and is not a Anne.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the busboy does exceed commensurateness.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the cat's-claw exceeds nigger and is not a Anne.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the cat's-claw is a glop.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cat's-claw is not a glop.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the busboy does not exceed commensurateness.;
$hypothesis$ = if the cat's-claw is not a kind of a glop then the laureate is not unstatesmanlike and/or does not exceed commensurateness. ; $context$ = sent1: the laureate is not unstatesmanlike and/or exceeds commensurateness. sent2: if the cat's-claw exceeds nigger but it is not a Anne it is a kind of a glop. sent3: the fact that the cat's-claw is a kind of a glop is true if it does exceed nigger and is a kind of a Anne. sent4: if the busboy does exceed commensurateness the cat's-claw exceeds nigger and is not a Anne. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the busboy does exceed commensurateness.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the cat's-claw exceeds nigger and is not a Anne.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the cat's-claw is a glop.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cat's-claw is not a glop.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the busboy does not exceed commensurateness.; __UNKNOWN__