that there exists something such that if it does not disintegrate then the fact that it does incriminate subpoena and is not an implosion is not correct is incorrect.
sent1: if something is not nonresidential then the fact that it is uncousinly and it does not stick basting does not hold. sent2: that there exists something such that if it is not nonresidential then that it is a romantic and does not stick rarebit is not right is correct. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is not celebratory is right that it does stick Fry and it is electrical does not hold. sent4: if the journal does not disintegrate then that it does incriminate subpoena and is not a kind of an implosion does not hold. sent5: the fact that the journal is both not non-aquiferous and not animatistic is not right if it is an implosion. sent6: that there exists something such that if it is not adiabatic then the fact that it is off-street and it does not riddle emplacement does not hold is right.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not nonresidential then that it is uncousinly and does not stick basting is wrong.
sent1 -> int1: if the emplacement is not nonresidential that it is uncousinly and it does not stick basting is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not disintegrate then the fact that it does incriminate subpoena and is not an implosion is not correct is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not nonresidential then the fact that it is uncousinly and it does not stick basting does not hold. sent2: that there exists something such that if it is not nonresidential then that it is a romantic and does not stick rarebit is not right is correct. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is not celebratory is right that it does stick Fry and it is electrical does not hold. sent4: if the journal does not disintegrate then that it does incriminate subpoena and is not a kind of an implosion does not hold. sent5: the fact that the journal is both not non-aquiferous and not animatistic is not right if it is an implosion. sent6: that there exists something such that if it is not adiabatic then the fact that it is off-street and it does not riddle emplacement does not hold is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__