the compoundedness does not occur.
sent1: the glamorizing trigon happens. sent2: the tapering occurs. sent3: the maddening Pasteur happens if that the maddening Pasteur does not occur and the method happens is wrong. sent4: the behavior happens. sent5: that the rubbing and the governorship happens is not correct. sent6: if that both the concretizing sperm and the buckle occurs is false then the Mass does not occur. sent7: the nonclassicalness happens. sent8: the faucalness occurs. sent9: if the marketplace does not occur the fact that the clausalness happens and the archaeologicalness occurs is false. sent10: the numeration does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the oleaceousness occurs and the combat occurs is not correct the fact that the landscaping does not occur hold. sent12: the intervention does not occur. sent13: the vasectomy does not occur. sent14: if that the estivating does not occur is right that the fact that the unwieldiness happens and the fishing occurs hold is not correct. sent15: that both the paternity and the Haitianness occurs is false. sent16: that that not the maddening Pasteur but the method happens hold does not hold if the colorlessness does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the compounding does not occur is not false then that both the urceolateness and the kineticness occurs is not correct. sent18: the non-kineticness prevents that the glamorizing trigon happens. sent19: that the difficultness does not occur and the glamorizing trigon does not occur is not true if the maddening Pasteur happens. sent20: the glamorizing trigon does not occur if that the fact that the urceolateness occurs and the kineticness occurs is true is not correct. sent21: the autoradiographicness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the compounding does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that both the urceolateness and the kineticness happens does not hold.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the glamorizing trigon does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the compounding does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the compoundedness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the glamorizing trigon happens. sent2: the tapering occurs. sent3: the maddening Pasteur happens if that the maddening Pasteur does not occur and the method happens is wrong. sent4: the behavior happens. sent5: that the rubbing and the governorship happens is not correct. sent6: if that both the concretizing sperm and the buckle occurs is false then the Mass does not occur. sent7: the nonclassicalness happens. sent8: the faucalness occurs. sent9: if the marketplace does not occur the fact that the clausalness happens and the archaeologicalness occurs is false. sent10: the numeration does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the oleaceousness occurs and the combat occurs is not correct the fact that the landscaping does not occur hold. sent12: the intervention does not occur. sent13: the vasectomy does not occur. sent14: if that the estivating does not occur is right that the fact that the unwieldiness happens and the fishing occurs hold is not correct. sent15: that both the paternity and the Haitianness occurs is false. sent16: that that not the maddening Pasteur but the method happens hold does not hold if the colorlessness does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the compounding does not occur is not false then that both the urceolateness and the kineticness occurs is not correct. sent18: the non-kineticness prevents that the glamorizing trigon happens. sent19: that the difficultness does not occur and the glamorizing trigon does not occur is not true if the maddening Pasteur happens. sent20: the glamorizing trigon does not occur if that the fact that the urceolateness occurs and the kineticness occurs is true is not correct. sent21: the autoradiographicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the compounding does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that both the urceolateness and the kineticness happens does not hold.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the glamorizing trigon does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__