the sheepwalk is near.
sent1: the fact that the drizzle does constipate is not false if it is not impervious and it does not clap boating. sent2: the enchanter is not a morula if there is something such that that it is not impervious and it does not clap boating does not hold. sent3: the drizzle does not constipate if the fact that it does constipate and is a bad is not right. sent4: the fact that the nitrite is both biauricular and a morula is not true if the enchanter is not a morula. sent5: the self-starter is not a headed but it is editorial if the nitrite is not periodic. sent6: that the drizzle does constipate and is a bad does not hold. sent7: that the sheepwalk is not non-near is not incorrect if the self-starter is not a headed but it is editorial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drizzle is not impervious and does not clap boating.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the drizzle does constipate.; sent3 & sent6 -> int2: the drizzle does not constipate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the drizzle is a kind of non-impervious thing that does not clap boating is incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not impervious and does not clap boating is incorrect.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the enchanter is not a morula is not wrong.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: that the nitrite is biauricular and is a kind of a morula is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the sheepwalk is near. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the drizzle does constipate is not false if it is not impervious and it does not clap boating. sent2: the enchanter is not a morula if there is something such that that it is not impervious and it does not clap boating does not hold. sent3: the drizzle does not constipate if the fact that it does constipate and is a bad is not right. sent4: the fact that the nitrite is both biauricular and a morula is not true if the enchanter is not a morula. sent5: the self-starter is not a headed but it is editorial if the nitrite is not periodic. sent6: that the drizzle does constipate and is a bad does not hold. sent7: that the sheepwalk is not non-near is not incorrect if the self-starter is not a headed but it is editorial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the drizzle is not impervious and does not clap boating.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the drizzle does constipate.; sent3 & sent6 -> int2: the drizzle does not constipate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the drizzle is a kind of non-impervious thing that does not clap boating is incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not impervious and does not clap boating is incorrect.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the enchanter is not a morula is not wrong.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: that the nitrite is biauricular and is a kind of a morula is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__