there is something such that it does not approach Kendall and it is an armoire.
sent1: something is not an armoire if that it is a kind of a Pusan that is irreparable does not hold. sent2: that the negotiator approaches Kendall and it is a Pusan is not correct if somethings do housekeep photocoagulation. sent3: if something does freeze-dry evisceration that the naphthoquinone is a D.C. and it does housekeep photocoagulation is not correct. sent4: if the dolichocephalic is not a kind of an armoire then the negotiator is an armoire. sent5: the fact that the fact that the negotiator does regard Phragmipedium and is a Tunisian is not false is not true if there is something such that it is orderly. sent6: something freeze-dries evisceration. sent7: if something is not unpalatable then the fact that it is a kind of a Pusan and is irreparable does not hold. sent8: if the dolichocephalic is not an armoire then the negotiator does not approach Kendall but it is an armoire.
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: that the naphthoquinone is a D.C. that does housekeep photocoagulation does not hold.; sent7 -> int2: if the dolichocephalic is not unpalatable the fact that it is a Pusan and it is irreparable is false.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the dolichocephalic is a Pusan and it is irreparable does not hold then it is not a kind of an armoire.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does not approach Kendall and it is an armoire. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not an armoire if that it is a kind of a Pusan that is irreparable does not hold. sent2: that the negotiator approaches Kendall and it is a Pusan is not correct if somethings do housekeep photocoagulation. sent3: if something does freeze-dry evisceration that the naphthoquinone is a D.C. and it does housekeep photocoagulation is not correct. sent4: if the dolichocephalic is not a kind of an armoire then the negotiator is an armoire. sent5: the fact that the fact that the negotiator does regard Phragmipedium and is a Tunisian is not false is not true if there is something such that it is orderly. sent6: something freeze-dries evisceration. sent7: if something is not unpalatable then the fact that it is a kind of a Pusan and is irreparable does not hold. sent8: if the dolichocephalic is not an armoire then the negotiator does not approach Kendall but it is an armoire. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: that the naphthoquinone is a D.C. that does housekeep photocoagulation does not hold.; sent7 -> int2: if the dolichocephalic is not unpalatable the fact that it is a Pusan and it is irreparable is false.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the dolichocephalic is a Pusan and it is irreparable does not hold then it is not a kind of an armoire.; __UNKNOWN__