the SEB is a romance.
sent1: if that the SEB is not a kind of a surfing is true then the fact that the insectivore is a kind of non-overhead thing that romances is false. sent2: the wirehair is oligarchic. sent3: if that the sensualist is a kind of non-mesic thing that is not monumental does not hold the anoa is a cheep. sent4: the antidiuretic is not a kind of a call-in or is non-ununderstood or both. sent5: there is something such that it tribulates Megaloptera. sent6: something is a German but it does not tribulate Megaloptera. sent7: if the anoa is not German that the insectivore is a cheep but it is not an overhead is incorrect. sent8: that the myxovirus does not tribulate Megaloptera is correct if there exists something such that it is a cheep but not an overhead. sent9: everything slights and tribulates ampere-turn. sent10: the fact that the sensualist is non-mesic thing that is not monumental is wrong if there is something such that it is not a pederasty. sent11: the fact that something is biaxial but it is not a Scorpaenidae is not true if it does not tribulate Megaloptera. sent12: if the wirehair is oligarchic it is phonemic. sent13: if something is chlorotic and it is phonemic then the fact that it is not a kind of a pederasty is true. sent14: the SEB does not surf if the rotogravure is not a kind of a ursinia but it tribulates ampere-turn. sent15: the anoa is a kind of non-German thing that is epicarpal if that it does not tribulate Megaloptera is not wrong. sent16: if something is not ununderstood then it is not a ursinia. sent17: the anoa is not a kind of an overhead if that the insectivore is not an overhead but it is a romance does not hold. sent18: the sensualist is not monumental if there is something such that the fact that it is both a cheep and not overhead does not hold. sent19: the rotogravure is not ununderstood if there is something such that either it is not a call-in or it is not ununderstood or both. sent20: the anoa does not tribulate Megaloptera. sent21: if the sensualist is not Swedish then that it clamors sensualist hold. sent22: if there exists something such that it is not monumental then the SEB is a romance but it is not a Scorpaenidae. sent23: The Megaloptera does not tribulate anoa. sent24: the wirehair is chlorotic.
sent15 & sent20 -> int1: the anoa is not a German but it is epicarpal.; int1 -> int2: the anoa is not a kind of a German.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the insectivore is both a cheep and not overhead is incorrect.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a cheep and it is not overhead does not hold.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the sensualist is not monumental.; int5 -> int6: something is not monumental.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the SEB is a kind of a romance that is not a kind of a Scorpaenidae.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the fact that the myxovirus is biaxial but it is not a kind of a Scorpaenidae does not hold is not false.
sent11 -> int8: the fact that the myxovirus is biaxial thing that is not a Scorpaenidae is not correct if it does not tribulate Megaloptera.; sent13 -> int9: if the wirehair is chlorotic and phonemic it is not a pederasty.; sent12 & sent2 -> int10: the wirehair is phonemic.; sent24 & int10 -> int11: the wirehair is chlorotic thing that is not non-phonemic.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the wirehair is not a pederasty.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a pederasty is correct.; int13 & sent10 -> int14: that the fact that the sensualist is not mesic and it is not monumental does not hold is true.; sent3 & int14 -> int15: the anoa is a kind of a cheep.; sent16 -> int16: the rotogravure is not a ursinia if it is not ununderstood.; sent4 -> int17: there exists something such that it is not a call-in or is not ununderstood or both.; int17 & sent19 -> int18: the rotogravure is not ununderstood.; int16 & int18 -> int19: the rotogravure is not a ursinia.; sent9 -> int20: the rotogravure does slight and does tribulate ampere-turn.; int20 -> int21: the rotogravure tribulates ampere-turn.; int19 & int21 -> int22: the rotogravure is not a ursinia and does tribulate ampere-turn.; sent14 & int22 -> int23: the SEB is not a surfing.; sent1 & int23 -> int24: that the insectivore is non-overhead thing that does romance does not hold.; sent17 & int24 -> int25: the anoa is not overhead.; int15 & int25 -> int26: the anoa is a cheep that is not an overhead.; int26 -> int27: something is a cheep but it is not a kind of an overhead.; int27 & sent8 -> int28: the myxovirus does not tribulate Megaloptera.; int8 & int28 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the SEB is a romance. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the SEB is not a kind of a surfing is true then the fact that the insectivore is a kind of non-overhead thing that romances is false. sent2: the wirehair is oligarchic. sent3: if that the sensualist is a kind of non-mesic thing that is not monumental does not hold the anoa is a cheep. sent4: the antidiuretic is not a kind of a call-in or is non-ununderstood or both. sent5: there is something such that it tribulates Megaloptera. sent6: something is a German but it does not tribulate Megaloptera. sent7: if the anoa is not German that the insectivore is a cheep but it is not an overhead is incorrect. sent8: that the myxovirus does not tribulate Megaloptera is correct if there exists something such that it is a cheep but not an overhead. sent9: everything slights and tribulates ampere-turn. sent10: the fact that the sensualist is non-mesic thing that is not monumental is wrong if there is something such that it is not a pederasty. sent11: the fact that something is biaxial but it is not a Scorpaenidae is not true if it does not tribulate Megaloptera. sent12: if the wirehair is oligarchic it is phonemic. sent13: if something is chlorotic and it is phonemic then the fact that it is not a kind of a pederasty is true. sent14: the SEB does not surf if the rotogravure is not a kind of a ursinia but it tribulates ampere-turn. sent15: the anoa is a kind of non-German thing that is epicarpal if that it does not tribulate Megaloptera is not wrong. sent16: if something is not ununderstood then it is not a ursinia. sent17: the anoa is not a kind of an overhead if that the insectivore is not an overhead but it is a romance does not hold. sent18: the sensualist is not monumental if there is something such that the fact that it is both a cheep and not overhead does not hold. sent19: the rotogravure is not ununderstood if there is something such that either it is not a call-in or it is not ununderstood or both. sent20: the anoa does not tribulate Megaloptera. sent21: if the sensualist is not Swedish then that it clamors sensualist hold. sent22: if there exists something such that it is not monumental then the SEB is a romance but it is not a Scorpaenidae. sent23: The Megaloptera does not tribulate anoa. sent24: the wirehair is chlorotic. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent20 -> int1: the anoa is not a German but it is epicarpal.; int1 -> int2: the anoa is not a kind of a German.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the insectivore is both a cheep and not overhead is incorrect.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a cheep and it is not overhead does not hold.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the sensualist is not monumental.; int5 -> int6: something is not monumental.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the SEB is a kind of a romance that is not a kind of a Scorpaenidae.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__