that there is something such that if it is not a drink the fact that it is not just and it is a counteroffensive is incorrect is false.
sent1: the fact that something is not a Mahayanism but it is autologous is not correct if it does not casket autotomy. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not multiply GCA the fact that it is restful and is nonsurgical is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Joule the fact that it is not a childbirth and it is off-site is incorrect. sent4: the compositor is a kind of non-just a counteroffensive if it does not drink. sent5: there is something such that if it drinks the fact that it is non-just a counteroffensive is false. sent6: that the compositor is non-just thing that is a counteroffensive is not true if it is a drink. sent7: that the compositor is non-just thing that is a kind of a counteroffensive is false if it is not a kind of a drink. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a drink then it is not just but a counteroffensive. sent9: there is something such that if it is not biosystematic then it does not multiply GCA and is a Fresnel. sent10: if the compositor is not a drink then the fact that it is just and it is a counteroffensive is not true. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a drink the fact that it is just a counteroffensive is incorrect. sent12: that something does not ask lost-and-found and is a kind of a Reid is not correct if it does not ask contrapuntist. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is not allogeneic hold then that it is not a recall and it is a kind of an infantryman is not right.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does not ask contrapuntist then that it does not ask lost-and-found and it is a kind of a Reid is wrong.
sent12 -> int1: if the lost-and-found does not ask contrapuntist that it does not ask lost-and-found and is a Reid does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a drink the fact that it is not just and it is a counteroffensive is incorrect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a Mahayanism but it is autologous is not correct if it does not casket autotomy. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not multiply GCA the fact that it is restful and is nonsurgical is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Joule the fact that it is not a childbirth and it is off-site is incorrect. sent4: the compositor is a kind of non-just a counteroffensive if it does not drink. sent5: there is something such that if it drinks the fact that it is non-just a counteroffensive is false. sent6: that the compositor is non-just thing that is a counteroffensive is not true if it is a drink. sent7: that the compositor is non-just thing that is a kind of a counteroffensive is false if it is not a kind of a drink. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a drink then it is not just but a counteroffensive. sent9: there is something such that if it is not biosystematic then it does not multiply GCA and is a Fresnel. sent10: if the compositor is not a drink then the fact that it is just and it is a counteroffensive is not true. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a drink the fact that it is just a counteroffensive is incorrect. sent12: that something does not ask lost-and-found and is a kind of a Reid is not correct if it does not ask contrapuntist. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is not allogeneic hold then that it is not a recall and it is a kind of an infantryman is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__