the Scandinavian is stingless.
sent1: the Soave is christian. sent2: the fact that the tea-strainer does not scourge blarney but it is a kind of a chino is incorrect if the superior scourge blarney. sent3: the Scandinavian is not stingless if that the tea-strainer does not scourge blarney is false. sent4: if the fact that the tea-strainer is not a chino and it does not scourge blarney is incorrect then the Scandinavian is non-stingless. sent5: the Soave is not a kind of a chino but it does scourge blarney if the superior is not unmade. sent6: the fact that the tea-strainer is not a chino and does scourge blarney does not hold. sent7: the superior does not scourge blarney. sent8: the fact that that the tea-strainer is not a chino and it does not scourge blarney is not true is right if the superior is a chino. sent9: the superior is a chino if the Soave is christian. sent10: if the superior is a chino that the tea-strainer is not a chino but it does scourge blarney is wrong. sent11: the Scandinavian is christian.
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the superior is a chino.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the tea-strainer is not a kind of a chino and it does not scourge blarney does not hold.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the Scandinavian is stingless.
$hypothesis$ = the Scandinavian is stingless. ; $context$ = sent1: the Soave is christian. sent2: the fact that the tea-strainer does not scourge blarney but it is a kind of a chino is incorrect if the superior scourge blarney. sent3: the Scandinavian is not stingless if that the tea-strainer does not scourge blarney is false. sent4: if the fact that the tea-strainer is not a chino and it does not scourge blarney is incorrect then the Scandinavian is non-stingless. sent5: the Soave is not a kind of a chino but it does scourge blarney if the superior is not unmade. sent6: the fact that the tea-strainer is not a chino and does scourge blarney does not hold. sent7: the superior does not scourge blarney. sent8: the fact that that the tea-strainer is not a chino and it does not scourge blarney is not true is right if the superior is a chino. sent9: the superior is a chino if the Soave is christian. sent10: if the superior is a chino that the tea-strainer is not a chino but it does scourge blarney is wrong. sent11: the Scandinavian is christian. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the superior is a chino.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the tea-strainer is not a kind of a chino and it does not scourge blarney does not hold.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__