that the distinctness happens causes that the autotypicness but not the skincare happens.
sent1: if that the temperance does not occur hold then the autotypicness but not the skincare occurs. sent2: the non-distinctness triggers that the animating and the habilitating happens. sent3: that that the autotypicness does not occur and the temperance does not occur hold prevents that the distinctness happens. sent4: the habilitating happens and the molding happens. sent5: if the alternating happens the autotypicness does not occur and the temperance does not occur. sent6: the molding occurs.
sent4 -> int1: the habilitating happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the distinctness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the habilitating and the distinctness occurs.;
both the animating and the resubmitting isogon occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the distinctness happens causes that the autotypicness but not the skincare happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the temperance does not occur hold then the autotypicness but not the skincare occurs. sent2: the non-distinctness triggers that the animating and the habilitating happens. sent3: that that the autotypicness does not occur and the temperance does not occur hold prevents that the distinctness happens. sent4: the habilitating happens and the molding happens. sent5: if the alternating happens the autotypicness does not occur and the temperance does not occur. sent6: the molding occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the habilitating happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the distinctness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the habilitating and the distinctness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__