the forcipateness brings about that the downhill does not occur and the palliation does not occur.
sent1: the creaming pratfall does not occur. sent2: the ticking happens. sent3: that the pitcher does not occur and the ampleness does not occur is caused by that the decreasing Methodism occurs. sent4: not the downhill but the palliation happens. sent5: if the radiating does not occur then the downhill does not occur and the palliation does not occur. sent6: if the radiating does not occur the downhill does not occur and the palliation occurs. sent7: if that the enfeoffing secessionist occurs but the confiscation does not occur does not hold then the radiating does not occur. sent8: that the enfeoffing secessionist happens but the confiscation does not occur causes the non-forcipateness. sent9: if the enfeoffing secessionist does not occur the radiating does not occur. sent10: the fact that the fact that the abundantness happens and the diamagnetism does not occur does not hold is not false. sent11: that the enfeoffing secessionist happens hold. sent12: the downhill does not occur. sent13: that the downhill occurs is prevented by that the radiating does not occur. sent14: if the forcipateness occurs then the downhill does not occur. sent15: that not the downhill but the palliation happens is caused by the forcipateness.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the forcipateness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enfeoffing secessionist happens but the confiscation does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the forcipateness does not occur is not wrong.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the enfeoffing secessionist happens and the confiscation does not occur is not true.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the radiating does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the downhill does not occur and the palliation does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the forcipateness brings about that the downhill does not occur and the palliation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the creaming pratfall does not occur. sent2: the ticking happens. sent3: that the pitcher does not occur and the ampleness does not occur is caused by that the decreasing Methodism occurs. sent4: not the downhill but the palliation happens. sent5: if the radiating does not occur then the downhill does not occur and the palliation does not occur. sent6: if the radiating does not occur the downhill does not occur and the palliation occurs. sent7: if that the enfeoffing secessionist occurs but the confiscation does not occur does not hold then the radiating does not occur. sent8: that the enfeoffing secessionist happens but the confiscation does not occur causes the non-forcipateness. sent9: if the enfeoffing secessionist does not occur the radiating does not occur. sent10: the fact that the fact that the abundantness happens and the diamagnetism does not occur does not hold is not false. sent11: that the enfeoffing secessionist happens hold. sent12: the downhill does not occur. sent13: that the downhill occurs is prevented by that the radiating does not occur. sent14: if the forcipateness occurs then the downhill does not occur. sent15: that not the downhill but the palliation happens is caused by the forcipateness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the forcipateness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enfeoffing secessionist happens but the confiscation does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the forcipateness does not occur is not wrong.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the enfeoffing secessionist happens and the confiscation does not occur is not true.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the radiating does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the downhill does not occur and the palliation does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__