there exists something such that if that it is both not a cappuccino and not an inevitable is not right then it is a Septobasidium.
sent1: if that the plaiter is not a kind of a cappuccino but it is inevitable is not true then it is a Septobasidium. sent2: the fact that if the fact that the fact that the plaiter is not the Vulgate and is not umbellate is not true hold then the plaiter is a maguey is correct. sent3: if the fact that something is not a Bolivian and it is not a sabbatical does not hold then it does carjack kwashiorkor. sent4: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a filmdom and not a diary does not hold then it is Homeric hold. sent5: something is a Septobasidium if the fact that it is not a cappuccino and it is an inevitable does not hold. sent6: the plaiter is a filmdom if the fact that it is not an attribute and it is not a abstractedness is wrong. sent7: something is a Septobasidium if it is a cappuccino. sent8: that there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a cappuccino and it is inevitable is not true then it is a Septobasidium hold. sent9: if something that is not a kind of a cappuccino is not inevitable it is a Septobasidium. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not stomatal and it is not discriminate is wrong it is bigger. sent11: if that something is not hypoglycemic and it is not a kind of a half-life is not true then it is dictyopteran. sent12: something is a Septobasidium if that that it is both not a cappuccino and not an inevitable is not wrong is not right. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a cappuccino it is a kind of a Septobasidium. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a cappuccino and is not inevitable then it is a Septobasidium. sent15: the plaiter is a kind of a Septobasidium if it is a cappuccino. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it does not segregate kwashiorkor and it does not parry is not right it does contribute. sent17: if the plaiter is not a cappuccino and it is not inevitable then it is a Septobasidium. sent18: there is something such that if that it does not escort and it does not prophesy does not hold that it does close is not false. sent19: there is something such that if the fact that it is both non-Swazi and non-subjacent is wrong then it is not non-closing. sent20: if the fact that the teletypewriter does not drown and it is not a kind of a tide does not hold it is a kind of a Septobasidium. sent21: if that something is not alterable and does not segregate kwashiorkor is not correct it is not non-closing.
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the plaiter is not a cappuccino and it is not a kind of an inevitable is incorrect then it is a kind of a Septobasidium.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is both not a cappuccino and not an inevitable is not right then it is a Septobasidium. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the plaiter is not a kind of a cappuccino but it is inevitable is not true then it is a Septobasidium. sent2: the fact that if the fact that the fact that the plaiter is not the Vulgate and is not umbellate is not true hold then the plaiter is a maguey is correct. sent3: if the fact that something is not a Bolivian and it is not a sabbatical does not hold then it does carjack kwashiorkor. sent4: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a filmdom and not a diary does not hold then it is Homeric hold. sent5: something is a Septobasidium if the fact that it is not a cappuccino and it is an inevitable does not hold. sent6: the plaiter is a filmdom if the fact that it is not an attribute and it is not a abstractedness is wrong. sent7: something is a Septobasidium if it is a cappuccino. sent8: that there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a cappuccino and it is inevitable is not true then it is a Septobasidium hold. sent9: if something that is not a kind of a cappuccino is not inevitable it is a Septobasidium. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not stomatal and it is not discriminate is wrong it is bigger. sent11: if that something is not hypoglycemic and it is not a kind of a half-life is not true then it is dictyopteran. sent12: something is a Septobasidium if that that it is both not a cappuccino and not an inevitable is not wrong is not right. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a cappuccino it is a kind of a Septobasidium. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a cappuccino and is not inevitable then it is a Septobasidium. sent15: the plaiter is a kind of a Septobasidium if it is a cappuccino. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it does not segregate kwashiorkor and it does not parry is not right it does contribute. sent17: if the plaiter is not a cappuccino and it is not inevitable then it is a Septobasidium. sent18: there is something such that if that it does not escort and it does not prophesy does not hold that it does close is not false. sent19: there is something such that if the fact that it is both non-Swazi and non-subjacent is wrong then it is not non-closing. sent20: if the fact that the teletypewriter does not drown and it is not a kind of a tide does not hold it is a kind of a Septobasidium. sent21: if that something is not alterable and does not segregate kwashiorkor is not correct it is not non-closing. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the plaiter is not a cappuccino and it is not a kind of an inevitable is incorrect then it is a kind of a Septobasidium.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__