the etodolac does silence mawkishness but it is not unthinkable.
sent1: the trump is a broad-mindedness but not unrespectable. sent2: the curio does not featherbed. sent3: the etodolac is a shortener. sent4: the curio silences mawkishness. sent5: if the etodolac is unthinkable the fact that the hansom is a kind of non-astronautic thing that does not silence mawkishness does not hold. sent6: the trump does featherbed. sent7: that the curio is not a graft and it is not a voluntary is false. sent8: if something is a featherbedding that it does silence mawkishness and is not unthinkable is wrong. sent9: if something is non-astronautic thing that is not a graft then the etodolac silences mawkishness. sent10: the trump is a voluntary. sent11: the etodolac is a barren if the fact that it is not a kind of a barren and it is not a chemical is not true. sent12: there is something such that it is astronautic but not a graft. sent13: that the etodolac is voluntary but it is not a kind of a lyric does not hold if it is a kind of a barren. sent14: the fact that the etodolac is a kind of non-voluntary thing that does not silence mawkishness is false. sent15: that the curio is both not unthinkable and not voluntary is incorrect if the trump does featherbed. sent16: there exists something such that it is not a graft. sent17: if something that is not a graft is not astronautic the hansom is unthinkable. sent18: the fact that the curio is unthinkable and is not a kind of a voluntary is incorrect. sent19: if that the curio is not unthinkable and not voluntary is not true the etodolac is not unthinkable. sent20: the hansom does not graft. sent21: the etodolac is not unthinkable if the curio is unthinkable. sent22: if the curio is a voluntary then that the trump is not a featherbedding and it is not astronautic is false. sent23: the etodolac does silence mawkishness if something is not astronautic and grafts.
sent15 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the curio is both not unthinkable and not voluntary does not hold.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the etodolac is not unthinkable.;
that the etodolac silences mawkishness and is not unthinkable is false.
sent8 -> int3: the fact that the etodolac silences mawkishness and is thinkable is wrong if that it is a featherbedding is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the etodolac does silence mawkishness but it is not unthinkable. ; $context$ = sent1: the trump is a broad-mindedness but not unrespectable. sent2: the curio does not featherbed. sent3: the etodolac is a shortener. sent4: the curio silences mawkishness. sent5: if the etodolac is unthinkable the fact that the hansom is a kind of non-astronautic thing that does not silence mawkishness does not hold. sent6: the trump does featherbed. sent7: that the curio is not a graft and it is not a voluntary is false. sent8: if something is a featherbedding that it does silence mawkishness and is not unthinkable is wrong. sent9: if something is non-astronautic thing that is not a graft then the etodolac silences mawkishness. sent10: the trump is a voluntary. sent11: the etodolac is a barren if the fact that it is not a kind of a barren and it is not a chemical is not true. sent12: there is something such that it is astronautic but not a graft. sent13: that the etodolac is voluntary but it is not a kind of a lyric does not hold if it is a kind of a barren. sent14: the fact that the etodolac is a kind of non-voluntary thing that does not silence mawkishness is false. sent15: that the curio is both not unthinkable and not voluntary is incorrect if the trump does featherbed. sent16: there exists something such that it is not a graft. sent17: if something that is not a graft is not astronautic the hansom is unthinkable. sent18: the fact that the curio is unthinkable and is not a kind of a voluntary is incorrect. sent19: if that the curio is not unthinkable and not voluntary is not true the etodolac is not unthinkable. sent20: the hansom does not graft. sent21: the etodolac is not unthinkable if the curio is unthinkable. sent22: if the curio is a voluntary then that the trump is not a featherbedding and it is not astronautic is false. sent23: the etodolac does silence mawkishness if something is not astronautic and grafts. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the curio is both not unthinkable and not voluntary does not hold.; sent19 & int1 -> int2: the etodolac is not unthinkable.; __UNKNOWN__