the fact that the carper is not philharmonic and it is not unprofessional is not correct.
sent1: if the carper is non-cecal it is not unprofessional. sent2: if something does not mill then it is not a kind of a personalty and does not loot quilted. sent3: that something is not philharmonic and it is not unprofessional is incorrect if it is cecal. sent4: something that is not cecal is not unprofessional. sent5: the mammee is noninfectious. sent6: something is non-philharmonic and it is not unprofessional if the fact that it is not cecal hold. sent7: if the fact that the baas is not limacine and it is not a lexicography is false it is nonpasserine. sent8: if the grigri is cecal the carper is cecal. sent9: if the fact that the grigri is not non-cecal and it is nonpasserine is not correct the fact that the carper is not non-cecal is not incorrect. sent10: if that the carper is nonpasserine and it is not non-cecal does not hold then the grigri is nonpasserine. sent11: the mammee is a kind of a Enesco. sent12: the phenylalanine is not superficial if there exists something such that it is noninfectious a Enesco. sent13: the grigri is cecal if the smilo is cecal. sent14: the carper is not cecal if that the grigri is not cecal is not incorrect. sent15: that the baas is not limacine and it is not a lexicography is not true if there is something such that that it is limacine is correct. sent16: the carper is not unprofessional. sent17: that the grigri is cecal and it is nonpasserine is incorrect. sent18: a non-superficial thing is a dada and is limacine.
sent6 -> int1: if the carper is not cecal it is not philharmonic but professional.; sent9 & sent17 -> int2: the carper is not cecal.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the carper is a kind of non-philharmonic thing that is not unprofessional is false.
sent3 -> int3: the fact that the carper is not philharmonic and it is not unprofessional does not hold if the fact that it is cecal hold.; sent18 -> int4: the phenylalanine is a dada and is limacine if it is not superficial.; sent5 & sent11 -> int5: the mammee is noninfectious and it is a Enesco.; int5 -> int6: something is noninfectious and it is a kind of a Enesco.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the phenylalanine is not superficial.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the phenylalanine is a dada and it is limacine.; int8 -> int9: that the phenylalanine is limacine is not false.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is limacine is not wrong.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: that the baas is not limacine and it is not a lexicography is not true.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: the baas is nonpasserine.; int12 -> int13: something is nonpasserine.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the carper is not philharmonic and it is not unprofessional is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the carper is non-cecal it is not unprofessional. sent2: if something does not mill then it is not a kind of a personalty and does not loot quilted. sent3: that something is not philharmonic and it is not unprofessional is incorrect if it is cecal. sent4: something that is not cecal is not unprofessional. sent5: the mammee is noninfectious. sent6: something is non-philharmonic and it is not unprofessional if the fact that it is not cecal hold. sent7: if the fact that the baas is not limacine and it is not a lexicography is false it is nonpasserine. sent8: if the grigri is cecal the carper is cecal. sent9: if the fact that the grigri is not non-cecal and it is nonpasserine is not correct the fact that the carper is not non-cecal is not incorrect. sent10: if that the carper is nonpasserine and it is not non-cecal does not hold then the grigri is nonpasserine. sent11: the mammee is a kind of a Enesco. sent12: the phenylalanine is not superficial if there exists something such that it is noninfectious a Enesco. sent13: the grigri is cecal if the smilo is cecal. sent14: the carper is not cecal if that the grigri is not cecal is not incorrect. sent15: that the baas is not limacine and it is not a lexicography is not true if there is something such that that it is limacine is correct. sent16: the carper is not unprofessional. sent17: that the grigri is cecal and it is nonpasserine is incorrect. sent18: a non-superficial thing is a dada and is limacine. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the carper is not cecal it is not philharmonic but professional.; sent9 & sent17 -> int2: the carper is not cecal.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__