there is something such that it is nonenzymatic but not a gumbo-limbo.
sent1: something is a inkberry if it does not mortify. sent2: the phycobilin is not a inkberry and/or it is not a Syria. sent3: the phycobilin is not nonenzymatic or it is a Syria or both. sent4: if something dissimilates shiner then it is bridgeable. sent5: if the nummulite is nonenzymatic then the phycobilin is not a gumbo-limbo or does not waste or both. sent6: the nummulite is a kind of a gumbo-limbo. sent7: the phycobilin does not waste and/or does not restore ubiety. sent8: if the phycobilin does restore ubiety then the nummulite is not a Syria and/or it does waste. sent9: if the nummulite is not a inkberry the fact that it is not a waste is not right. sent10: the nummulite is not a Syria or does not waste or both if the phycobilin restores ubiety. sent11: the fact that the phycobilin is a character but it does not dissimilate shiner is not correct. sent12: that if the nummulite mortifies then the phycobilin is nonenzymatic and/or it is not a Syria is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the nummulite is not a kind of a Syria and/or it is not a kind of a waste is not right. sent14: the fact that either the shiner is not a stereotype or it is not a kind of a impreciseness or both is not correct. sent15: something does restore ubiety if that it is a inkberry is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the phycobilin is nonenzymatic thing that is not a kind of a gumbo-limbo is not correct.; sent1 -> int1: if the phycobilin does not mortify then it is a inkberry.; sent15 -> int2: if the phycobilin is a kind of a inkberry it does restore ubiety.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is nonenzymatic but not a gumbo-limbo. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a inkberry if it does not mortify. sent2: the phycobilin is not a inkberry and/or it is not a Syria. sent3: the phycobilin is not nonenzymatic or it is a Syria or both. sent4: if something dissimilates shiner then it is bridgeable. sent5: if the nummulite is nonenzymatic then the phycobilin is not a gumbo-limbo or does not waste or both. sent6: the nummulite is a kind of a gumbo-limbo. sent7: the phycobilin does not waste and/or does not restore ubiety. sent8: if the phycobilin does restore ubiety then the nummulite is not a Syria and/or it does waste. sent9: if the nummulite is not a inkberry the fact that it is not a waste is not right. sent10: the nummulite is not a Syria or does not waste or both if the phycobilin restores ubiety. sent11: the fact that the phycobilin is a character but it does not dissimilate shiner is not correct. sent12: that if the nummulite mortifies then the phycobilin is nonenzymatic and/or it is not a Syria is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the nummulite is not a kind of a Syria and/or it is not a kind of a waste is not right. sent14: the fact that either the shiner is not a stereotype or it is not a kind of a impreciseness or both is not correct. sent15: something does restore ubiety if that it is a inkberry is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the phycobilin is nonenzymatic thing that is not a kind of a gumbo-limbo is not correct.; sent1 -> int1: if the phycobilin does not mortify then it is a inkberry.; sent15 -> int2: if the phycobilin is a kind of a inkberry it does restore ubiety.; __UNKNOWN__