that the axon is non-splashy hold.
sent1: that the axon is infelicitous and it walks Tay does not hold if the he does not walks Tay. sent2: there exists something such that it does not walk Tay or does sow or both. sent3: if the fact that the eyeful does not sow and does not firebomb Sarpedon is not true it firebomb Sarpedon. sent4: if that something is infelicitous and it walks Tay is incorrect it is not splashy. sent5: the eyeful does not walk contentedness and it is not dioecious if the he is dioecious. sent6: The fact that the Brahmanism walks cabstand is not false. sent7: the fact that the cabstand walks Brahmanism is not false. sent8: that if something walks Brahmanism the parish sows hold. sent9: if the eyeful does not walk contentedness and it is not dioecious the parish does not sow. sent10: the he is dioecious if it does firebomb Sarpedon and is not Ibsenian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the he does firebomb Sarpedon but it is not Ibsenian.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the he is dioecious.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the eyeful does not walk contentedness and it is not dioecious.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the parish does not sow.; sent7 -> int4: there is something such that that it walks Brahmanism is not incorrect.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the parish sows.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the he does firebomb Sarpedon and is not Ibsenian does not hold.; sent4 -> int8: that if the fact that the axon is infelicitous and it does walk Tay is not right the axon is not splashy is not wrong.;
the parish does firebomb Sarpedon.
$hypothesis$ = that the axon is non-splashy hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the axon is infelicitous and it walks Tay does not hold if the he does not walks Tay. sent2: there exists something such that it does not walk Tay or does sow or both. sent3: if the fact that the eyeful does not sow and does not firebomb Sarpedon is not true it firebomb Sarpedon. sent4: if that something is infelicitous and it walks Tay is incorrect it is not splashy. sent5: the eyeful does not walk contentedness and it is not dioecious if the he is dioecious. sent6: The fact that the Brahmanism walks cabstand is not false. sent7: the fact that the cabstand walks Brahmanism is not false. sent8: that if something walks Brahmanism the parish sows hold. sent9: if the eyeful does not walk contentedness and it is not dioecious the parish does not sow. sent10: the he is dioecious if it does firebomb Sarpedon and is not Ibsenian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the he does firebomb Sarpedon but it is not Ibsenian.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the he is dioecious.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the eyeful does not walk contentedness and it is not dioecious.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the parish does not sow.; sent7 -> int4: there is something such that that it walks Brahmanism is not incorrect.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the parish sows.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the he does firebomb Sarpedon and is not Ibsenian does not hold.; sent4 -> int8: that if the fact that the axon is infelicitous and it does walk Tay is not right the axon is not splashy is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__