that the nonrepresentativeness does not occur and the epilepticness happens is triggered by that the flowage does not occur.
sent1: the tincturing dissolving happens. sent2: if the tincturing conditioner does not occur the non-invariableness and the redecorating alligatorfish happens. sent3: the redecorating epidemiology occurs. sent4: either the tincturing roping or the battling or both happens. sent5: the tincturing conditioner happens. sent6: the nonrepresentativeness does not occur if the interrelating Polycarp does not occur. sent7: the falling security happens if the fact that the attack happens is not incorrect. sent8: if the igniting happens the redecorating hindquarter occurs. sent9: the reorganization happens. sent10: the goal-kick happens. sent11: either the taming or the catheterization or both happens. sent12: the inefficaciousness does not occur. sent13: the pushball happens. sent14: the interrelating Polycarp prevents that the Polo does not occur. sent15: the swashing happens. sent16: that the falling Abkhaz occurs or the redecorating complicatedness occurs or both is true. sent17: that the injury does not occur but the leaner happens is brought about by the non-Aleutiansness. sent18: the windward occurs. sent19: the representativeness and the epileptic occurs if the flowage happens. sent20: the flowage occurs if the Polo happens. sent21: the catheterization prevents that the epilepticness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the interrelating Polycarp happens.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: the Polo occurs.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the flowage occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flowage does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the interrelating Polycarp does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the nonrepresentativeness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the nonrepresentativeness does not occur and the epilepticness happens is triggered by that the flowage does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the tincturing dissolving happens. sent2: if the tincturing conditioner does not occur the non-invariableness and the redecorating alligatorfish happens. sent3: the redecorating epidemiology occurs. sent4: either the tincturing roping or the battling or both happens. sent5: the tincturing conditioner happens. sent6: the nonrepresentativeness does not occur if the interrelating Polycarp does not occur. sent7: the falling security happens if the fact that the attack happens is not incorrect. sent8: if the igniting happens the redecorating hindquarter occurs. sent9: the reorganization happens. sent10: the goal-kick happens. sent11: either the taming or the catheterization or both happens. sent12: the inefficaciousness does not occur. sent13: the pushball happens. sent14: the interrelating Polycarp prevents that the Polo does not occur. sent15: the swashing happens. sent16: that the falling Abkhaz occurs or the redecorating complicatedness occurs or both is true. sent17: that the injury does not occur but the leaner happens is brought about by the non-Aleutiansness. sent18: the windward occurs. sent19: the representativeness and the epileptic occurs if the flowage happens. sent20: the flowage occurs if the Polo happens. sent21: the catheterization prevents that the epilepticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the interrelating Polycarp happens.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: the Polo occurs.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the flowage occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flowage does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the interrelating Polycarp does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the nonrepresentativeness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__