the fact that the indehiscentness but not the finerness happens is not right.
sent1: the incriminating tomorrow occurs. sent2: the circumnavigation occurs. sent3: the equalization occurs. sent4: the invulnerableness occurs. sent5: the fact that the excommunication does not occur is correct. sent6: if both the equalization and the circumnavigation occurs the pyroelectricity does not occur. sent7: that both the defending and the annunciatoriness happens prevents that the lenience occurs.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the equalization happens and the circumnavigation occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the pyroelectricity does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the indehiscentness but not the finerness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the incriminating tomorrow occurs. sent2: the circumnavigation occurs. sent3: the equalization occurs. sent4: the invulnerableness occurs. sent5: the fact that the excommunication does not occur is correct. sent6: if both the equalization and the circumnavigation occurs the pyroelectricity does not occur. sent7: that both the defending and the annunciatoriness happens prevents that the lenience occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the equalization happens and the circumnavigation occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the pyroelectricity does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__