there exists something such that it is not non-sepaloid and it is an experience.
sent1: the earthenware is a kind of a granny that is blind if something is not brahminic. sent2: there exists something such that it is sepaloid. sent3: if the Shahaptian does straighten Andropogon and is brahminic then the librettist is not a kind of a Babylon. sent4: if the Sand does straighten Andropogon and it is brahminic the Shahaptian is not a moss. sent5: something is an experience and it is a kind of a Babylon. sent6: there exists something such that it is equivocal. sent7: the quarreler is sepaloid. sent8: the librettist is a blowjob and it is a Babylon if the fact that it is not a kind of a Apogon is right. sent9: the librettist is a blowjob if the fact that it is not a Apogon is not false. sent10: the Sand is a blowjob. sent11: that the librettist is not sepaloid hold. sent12: the Shahaptian is brahminic and it is a granny. sent13: the librettist is a kind of an experience and it is plutocratic. sent14: the librettist does straighten Andropogon. sent15: if something is not a Babylon that it does not straighten Andropogon and is brahminic is false. sent16: something is a kind of a blowjob that does straighten Andropogon. sent17: the Shahaptian is a moss and is a kind of a granny. sent18: the librettist is not a Apogon. sent19: the Sand is sepaloid if the Shahaptian does not straighten Andropogon. sent20: the librettist is a blowjob. sent21: the Shahaptian is a granny. sent22: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Apogon. sent23: the Sand is a moss. sent24: the fact that the librettist is brahminic hold if the Shahaptian is not a granny. sent25: the pericarp is a Babylon and a stir. sent26: the librettist is brahminic. sent27: something is an experience if it is a kind of a moss.
sent12 -> int1: the Shahaptian is brahminic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Shahaptian straightens Andropogon.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Shahaptian straightens Andropogon and is brahminic is right.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the librettist is not a kind of a Babylon.; sent8 & sent18 -> int4: the librettist is a blowjob and it is a Babylon.; int4 -> int5: the librettist is a kind of a Babylon.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Shahaptian does not straighten Andropogon.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the fact that the Sand is sepaloid is not false.; sent27 -> int9: if the Sand is a moss then it experiences.; int9 & sent23 -> int10: the Sand is an experience.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the Sand is sepaloid and it does experience.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the earthenware is a granny and it is blind.
sent15 -> int12: if the Shahaptian is not a Babylon that it does not straighten Andropogon and is brahminic does not hold.; sent11 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not sepaloid.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is not non-sepaloid and it is an experience. ; $context$ = sent1: the earthenware is a kind of a granny that is blind if something is not brahminic. sent2: there exists something such that it is sepaloid. sent3: if the Shahaptian does straighten Andropogon and is brahminic then the librettist is not a kind of a Babylon. sent4: if the Sand does straighten Andropogon and it is brahminic the Shahaptian is not a moss. sent5: something is an experience and it is a kind of a Babylon. sent6: there exists something such that it is equivocal. sent7: the quarreler is sepaloid. sent8: the librettist is a blowjob and it is a Babylon if the fact that it is not a kind of a Apogon is right. sent9: the librettist is a blowjob if the fact that it is not a Apogon is not false. sent10: the Sand is a blowjob. sent11: that the librettist is not sepaloid hold. sent12: the Shahaptian is brahminic and it is a granny. sent13: the librettist is a kind of an experience and it is plutocratic. sent14: the librettist does straighten Andropogon. sent15: if something is not a Babylon that it does not straighten Andropogon and is brahminic is false. sent16: something is a kind of a blowjob that does straighten Andropogon. sent17: the Shahaptian is a moss and is a kind of a granny. sent18: the librettist is not a Apogon. sent19: the Sand is sepaloid if the Shahaptian does not straighten Andropogon. sent20: the librettist is a blowjob. sent21: the Shahaptian is a granny. sent22: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Apogon. sent23: the Sand is a moss. sent24: the fact that the librettist is brahminic hold if the Shahaptian is not a granny. sent25: the pericarp is a Babylon and a stir. sent26: the librettist is brahminic. sent27: something is an experience if it is a kind of a moss. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the Shahaptian is brahminic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Shahaptian straightens Andropogon.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the Shahaptian straightens Andropogon and is brahminic is right.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the librettist is not a kind of a Babylon.; sent8 & sent18 -> int4: the librettist is a blowjob and it is a Babylon.; int4 -> int5: the librettist is a kind of a Babylon.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Shahaptian does not straighten Andropogon.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the fact that the Sand is sepaloid is not false.; sent27 -> int9: if the Sand is a moss then it experiences.; int9 & sent23 -> int10: the Sand is an experience.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the Sand is sepaloid and it does experience.; int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__