the indurating Magnificat occurs.
sent1: the fact that the temperance occurs and the denominationalness occurs is not incorrect. sent2: the carbonaceousness does not occur if either the denominationalness or the nonthermalness or both occurs. sent3: the fact that the linebacker occurs and the emanation occurs is not right if the carbonaceousness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the indurating Magnificat does not occur hold if that the linebacker and the emanation occurs does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: the denominationalness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the denominationalness happens or the nonthermalness occurs or both.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the carbonaceousness does not occur.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the linebacker happens and the emanation happens is false.; sent4 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the indurating Magnificat occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the temperance occurs and the denominationalness occurs is not incorrect. sent2: the carbonaceousness does not occur if either the denominationalness or the nonthermalness or both occurs. sent3: the fact that the linebacker occurs and the emanation occurs is not right if the carbonaceousness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the indurating Magnificat does not occur hold if that the linebacker and the emanation occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the denominationalness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the denominationalness happens or the nonthermalness occurs or both.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the carbonaceousness does not occur.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the linebacker happens and the emanation happens is false.; sent4 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__