that the panda is not a Mayas but it is a wulfenite is false.
sent1: if the fact that the fact that the roller-skater is a dolphinfish but not a Longfellow is wrong is true the collegian is not a kind of a dolphinfish. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a dolphinfish the recognition is not a wulfenite or not a Mayas or both. sent3: the fact that the Green is not a kind of a hydrazine and it is not a kind of an epicure if the recognition does not afforest Muse is not incorrect. sent4: if the roller-skater is an action but it is not tasteful then it is not a kind of a somniloquist. sent5: the fact that the panda is not a kind of a Mayas but it is a wulfenite is false if the Green does lean muumuu. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a dolphinfish and is not a kind of a Longfellow does not hold if it is not a somniloquist. sent7: something is not a Mayas and is a wulfenite if it is a benefit. sent8: that the Green is a benefit that is a kind of an epicure is incorrect if there exists something such that it is not an epicure. sent9: the stateswoman is a wulfenite. sent10: if that the Green benefits and it is a kind of an epicure does not hold the panda does not afforest Muse. sent11: that the Green is not cytoarchitectural and does not afforest Muse is incorrect if it is not an epicure. sent12: if something benefits or it is an epicure or both then the recognition is not a kind of a hydrazine. sent13: if something is not cytoarchitectural and is not a hydrazine it is not a kind of an epicure. sent14: the range is not a kind of a Panamanian. sent15: the xanthomonad is residuary or it is a wulfenite or both. sent16: something does not lean muumuu if either it is not a kind of a wulfenite or it is not a Mayas or both. sent17: the recognition is a wulfenite. sent18: if the range is not Panamanian then the roller-skater does action but it is not tasteful. sent19: the fact that the recognition is a hydrazine is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Green is an epicure is correct.; assump1 -> int1: the Green is a benefit and/or it is an epicure.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a benefit or is a kind of an epicure or both.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the recognition is not a kind of a hydrazine is not wrong.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Green is not an epicure.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the Green is not cytoarchitectural and does not afforest Muse is not correct.;
the panda is not a Mayas but it is a kind of a wulfenite.
sent7 -> int7: the panda is not a kind of a Mayas and is a wulfenite if that it is a benefit is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the panda is not a Mayas but it is a wulfenite is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the fact that the roller-skater is a dolphinfish but not a Longfellow is wrong is true the collegian is not a kind of a dolphinfish. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a dolphinfish the recognition is not a wulfenite or not a Mayas or both. sent3: the fact that the Green is not a kind of a hydrazine and it is not a kind of an epicure if the recognition does not afforest Muse is not incorrect. sent4: if the roller-skater is an action but it is not tasteful then it is not a kind of a somniloquist. sent5: the fact that the panda is not a kind of a Mayas but it is a wulfenite is false if the Green does lean muumuu. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a dolphinfish and is not a kind of a Longfellow does not hold if it is not a somniloquist. sent7: something is not a Mayas and is a wulfenite if it is a benefit. sent8: that the Green is a benefit that is a kind of an epicure is incorrect if there exists something such that it is not an epicure. sent9: the stateswoman is a wulfenite. sent10: if that the Green benefits and it is a kind of an epicure does not hold the panda does not afforest Muse. sent11: that the Green is not cytoarchitectural and does not afforest Muse is incorrect if it is not an epicure. sent12: if something benefits or it is an epicure or both then the recognition is not a kind of a hydrazine. sent13: if something is not cytoarchitectural and is not a hydrazine it is not a kind of an epicure. sent14: the range is not a kind of a Panamanian. sent15: the xanthomonad is residuary or it is a wulfenite or both. sent16: something does not lean muumuu if either it is not a kind of a wulfenite or it is not a Mayas or both. sent17: the recognition is a wulfenite. sent18: if the range is not Panamanian then the roller-skater does action but it is not tasteful. sent19: the fact that the recognition is a hydrazine is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Green is an epicure is correct.; assump1 -> int1: the Green is a benefit and/or it is an epicure.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a benefit or is a kind of an epicure or both.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that the recognition is not a kind of a hydrazine is not wrong.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the Green is not an epicure.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the Green is not cytoarchitectural and does not afforest Muse is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__