that if the skinny-diping happens that not the frying but the hydrocephalicness occurs is incorrect is true.
sent1: that that the indexing fisc and the abidance happens is not true hold. sent2: if either the hydrocephalicness or the culturing sparring or both occurs the skinny-diping does not occur. sent3: that the culturing sparring occurs is not false. sent4: the frying does not occur. sent5: that the decriminalization occurs and the frying occurs is triggered by that the hydrocephalicness does not occur. sent6: if the skinny-diping happens then the fact that both the frying and the hydrocephalicness happens is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frying does not occur but the hydrocephalicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the hydrocephalicness happens.; int1 -> int2: the hydrocephalicness occurs and/or the culturing sparring occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the skinny-dip does not occur is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the skinny-dip occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that not the frying but the hydrocephalicness occurs is not right.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the decriminalization and/or the culturing catarrh happens hold.
$hypothesis$ = that if the skinny-diping happens that not the frying but the hydrocephalicness occurs is incorrect is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the indexing fisc and the abidance happens is not true hold. sent2: if either the hydrocephalicness or the culturing sparring or both occurs the skinny-diping does not occur. sent3: that the culturing sparring occurs is not false. sent4: the frying does not occur. sent5: that the decriminalization occurs and the frying occurs is triggered by that the hydrocephalicness does not occur. sent6: if the skinny-diping happens then the fact that both the frying and the hydrocephalicness happens is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frying does not occur but the hydrocephalicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the hydrocephalicness happens.; int1 -> int2: the hydrocephalicness occurs and/or the culturing sparring occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the skinny-dip does not occur is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the skinny-dip occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that not the frying but the hydrocephalicness occurs is not right.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__