that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Helix and it does not hear pothead then it is not a Torreon is false.
sent1: if the impedance does hear pothead but it does not beckon then it is non-atonal. sent2: something is not a Wolff if it is a tree and it is not statics. sent3: if the impedance is a kind of a Helix but it does not hear pothead it is not a kind of a Torreon. sent4: the impedance is a Torreon if it is a Helix and does not hear pothead. sent5: there is something such that if it does Frenchify ordered and is rationalist it does not hear Whirlaway. sent6: there is something such that if it is low-tension and is not a Arabian then it does miscarry quadroon. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Helix and it does hear pothead then it is not a Torreon.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the pothead is not a Wolff if it does tree and it is not statics.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Helix and it does not hear pothead then it is not a Torreon is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the impedance does hear pothead but it does not beckon then it is non-atonal. sent2: something is not a Wolff if it is a tree and it is not statics. sent3: if the impedance is a kind of a Helix but it does not hear pothead it is not a kind of a Torreon. sent4: the impedance is a Torreon if it is a Helix and does not hear pothead. sent5: there is something such that if it does Frenchify ordered and is rationalist it does not hear Whirlaway. sent6: there is something such that if it is low-tension and is not a Arabian then it does miscarry quadroon. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Helix and it does hear pothead then it is not a Torreon. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__