there exists something such that if it is not a mixture then that it is not a tetrasaccharide and it is not non-brachiopod is wrong.
sent1: if something is not romantic then that it is not a tetrasaccharide and it is a brachiopod is not true. sent2: if the roadhouse is not a mixture then that it is non-embolic and a hellebore does not hold. sent3: the fact that the roadhouse is not a linstock and is romantic is false. sent4: if that something is non-embolic but it is a hellebore is not right then it is not a romantic. sent5: that the valuer is not a hellebore but it is a fugu is wrong if it does not clue recombination. sent6: if a romantic thing is a kind of a mixture then it is not a tetrasaccharide.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roadhouse is not a mixture.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the roadhouse is non-embolic thing that is a hellebore is wrong.; sent4 -> int2: the roadhouse is not a kind of a romantic if that it is not embolic and it is a kind of a hellebore is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the roadhouse is not a kind of a romantic is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the roadhouse is not a tetrasaccharide but it is a brachiopod is wrong if it is not romantic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the roadhouse is not a tetrasaccharide and is a kind of a brachiopod is not right.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the roadhouse is not a mixture that it is not a tetrasaccharide and is brachiopod is wrong.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the baddeleyite is not a tetrasaccharide.
sent6 -> int7: if the baddeleyite is romantic and it is a mixture then it is not a tetrasaccharide.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a mixture then that it is not a tetrasaccharide and it is not non-brachiopod is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not romantic then that it is not a tetrasaccharide and it is a brachiopod is not true. sent2: if the roadhouse is not a mixture then that it is non-embolic and a hellebore does not hold. sent3: the fact that the roadhouse is not a linstock and is romantic is false. sent4: if that something is non-embolic but it is a hellebore is not right then it is not a romantic. sent5: that the valuer is not a hellebore but it is a fugu is wrong if it does not clue recombination. sent6: if a romantic thing is a kind of a mixture then it is not a tetrasaccharide. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roadhouse is not a mixture.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the roadhouse is non-embolic thing that is a hellebore is wrong.; sent4 -> int2: the roadhouse is not a kind of a romantic if that it is not embolic and it is a kind of a hellebore is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the roadhouse is not a kind of a romantic is not incorrect.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the roadhouse is not a tetrasaccharide but it is a brachiopod is wrong if it is not romantic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the roadhouse is not a tetrasaccharide and is a kind of a brachiopod is not right.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the roadhouse is not a mixture that it is not a tetrasaccharide and is brachiopod is wrong.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__