the fact that that there exists something such that if that it is field-crop and it is not a running is not true then it does service balmoral is not incorrect does not hold.
sent1: the conjugate does taste if that it services balmoral and does not tinge is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it runs it services balmoral. sent3: there exists something such that if it is field-crop and it is not a running then that it does service balmoral is right. sent4: something is microbial if the fact that it runs and it does not service sunsuit does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is alkaloidal it is a Keynesianism. sent6: if the conjugate is field-crop and does not run it services balmoral. sent7: there is something such that if that it does reface phone and it does not foray is not correct it does reface conjugate. sent8: there is something such that if it is not field-crop it services balmoral. sent9: the conjugate services balmoral if it is a running. sent10: there is something such that if that it is not non-field-crop but a running is incorrect then it services balmoral. sent11: the fact that the conjugate services balmoral is right if that it is field-crop and it is not a running is incorrect.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the sunsuit does run and does not service sunsuit is not right then it is microbial.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that there exists something such that if that it is field-crop and it is not a running is not true then it does service balmoral is not incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the conjugate does taste if that it services balmoral and does not tinge is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it runs it services balmoral. sent3: there exists something such that if it is field-crop and it is not a running then that it does service balmoral is right. sent4: something is microbial if the fact that it runs and it does not service sunsuit does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is alkaloidal it is a Keynesianism. sent6: if the conjugate is field-crop and does not run it services balmoral. sent7: there is something such that if that it does reface phone and it does not foray is not correct it does reface conjugate. sent8: there is something such that if it is not field-crop it services balmoral. sent9: the conjugate services balmoral if it is a running. sent10: there is something such that if that it is not non-field-crop but a running is incorrect then it services balmoral. sent11: the fact that the conjugate services balmoral is right if that it is field-crop and it is not a running is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__