the fumigant does not absolve.
sent1: that the chert does hum Monterey hold if it is aposiopetic. sent2: the fumigant hums fumigant. sent3: that the chert either does hum Monterey or does hum fumigant or both is wrong if the orator is not a kind of a defect. sent4: the orator does not hum Monterey. sent5: the fumigant is not a defect if that the orator does not absolve is correct. sent6: there is something such that it hums Monterey or it is a kind of a defect or both. sent7: that the fact that the orator is not histological but it is aposiopetic is not true hold. sent8: the fumigant does not absolve if that it is a kind of non-histological thing that is a Nancere is false. sent9: the orator is a Nancere if it is a kind of a defect. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it hums Monterey and/or it does hum fumigant does not hold then the fumigant does not absolve. sent11: the chert does not hum Monterey if that it is not aposiopetic and it does absolve does not hold. sent12: the chert is not non-histological if it hums Monterey. sent13: the barbel is not aposiopetic. sent14: there exists something such that it does hum Monterey and/or is histological. sent15: the fumigant is a kind of a defect. sent16: the fumigant is not aposiopetic. sent17: if the fact that the orator is not histological but it is aposiopetic is false then it is not a Nancere. sent18: the chert does not hum Monterey if it is aposiopetic. sent19: that the fumigant does not absolve and is a kind of a Nancere is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orator is a defect.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the orator is a kind of a Nancere.; sent17 & sent7 -> int2: the orator is not a Nancere.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the orator is not a kind of a defect.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that that that either the chert hums Monterey or it does hum fumigant or both hold does not hold is right.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it hums Monterey or it hums fumigant or both is not true.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fumigant does not absolve. ; $context$ = sent1: that the chert does hum Monterey hold if it is aposiopetic. sent2: the fumigant hums fumigant. sent3: that the chert either does hum Monterey or does hum fumigant or both is wrong if the orator is not a kind of a defect. sent4: the orator does not hum Monterey. sent5: the fumigant is not a defect if that the orator does not absolve is correct. sent6: there is something such that it hums Monterey or it is a kind of a defect or both. sent7: that the fact that the orator is not histological but it is aposiopetic is not true hold. sent8: the fumigant does not absolve if that it is a kind of non-histological thing that is a Nancere is false. sent9: the orator is a Nancere if it is a kind of a defect. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it hums Monterey and/or it does hum fumigant does not hold then the fumigant does not absolve. sent11: the chert does not hum Monterey if that it is not aposiopetic and it does absolve does not hold. sent12: the chert is not non-histological if it hums Monterey. sent13: the barbel is not aposiopetic. sent14: there exists something such that it does hum Monterey and/or is histological. sent15: the fumigant is a kind of a defect. sent16: the fumigant is not aposiopetic. sent17: if the fact that the orator is not histological but it is aposiopetic is false then it is not a Nancere. sent18: the chert does not hum Monterey if it is aposiopetic. sent19: that the fumigant does not absolve and is a kind of a Nancere is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orator is a defect.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the orator is a kind of a Nancere.; sent17 & sent7 -> int2: the orator is not a Nancere.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the orator is not a kind of a defect.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that that that either the chert hums Monterey or it does hum fumigant or both hold does not hold is right.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it hums Monterey or it hums fumigant or both is not true.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__