the kamikaze is not Soviets.
sent1: if the pinchgut is impenitent the hone is a kind of a Neapolitan. sent2: if the bawler is both not unrenewable and tidy then the kamikaze is not a lordship. sent3: something that is not a lordship is not Soviets. sent4: if the pinchgut angers the hone is a kind of a Neapolitan. sent5: the Oxford is impenitent if the pinchgut does not anger and it is impenitent. sent6: the bawler is not an anger if it is not a kind of a ribald. sent7: the pinchgut is an anger and/or it is impenitent. sent8: something is not unrenewable and not untidy if it is a ribald. sent9: the kamikaze is not a lordship if the bawler is not unrenewable but it is untidy. sent10: the kamikaze is not a lordship if the bawler is unrenewable and is not untidy. sent11: the autoantibody does beat steeple if the hone is a enterotoxemia. sent12: something is a enterotoxemia if it is a Neapolitan. sent13: if the autoantibody beats steeple then the fact that the bawler is not a ribald is incorrect.
sent7 & sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the hone is a Neapolitan.; sent12 -> int2: the hone is a enterotoxemia if it is not non-Neapolitan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hone is a enterotoxemia.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the autoantibody beats steeple is not wrong.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the bawler is a kind of a ribald.; sent8 -> int6: the bawler is a kind of renewable thing that is not untidy if it is a ribald.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bawler is not unrenewable and is not untidy.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the fact that the kamikaze is not a lordship is correct.; sent3 -> int9: the kamikaze is not Soviets if it is not a kind of a lordship.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the Oxford is impenitent is true.
$hypothesis$ = the kamikaze is not Soviets. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pinchgut is impenitent the hone is a kind of a Neapolitan. sent2: if the bawler is both not unrenewable and tidy then the kamikaze is not a lordship. sent3: something that is not a lordship is not Soviets. sent4: if the pinchgut angers the hone is a kind of a Neapolitan. sent5: the Oxford is impenitent if the pinchgut does not anger and it is impenitent. sent6: the bawler is not an anger if it is not a kind of a ribald. sent7: the pinchgut is an anger and/or it is impenitent. sent8: something is not unrenewable and not untidy if it is a ribald. sent9: the kamikaze is not a lordship if the bawler is not unrenewable but it is untidy. sent10: the kamikaze is not a lordship if the bawler is unrenewable and is not untidy. sent11: the autoantibody does beat steeple if the hone is a enterotoxemia. sent12: something is a enterotoxemia if it is a Neapolitan. sent13: if the autoantibody beats steeple then the fact that the bawler is not a ribald is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the hone is a Neapolitan.; sent12 -> int2: the hone is a enterotoxemia if it is not non-Neapolitan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hone is a enterotoxemia.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the autoantibody beats steeple is not wrong.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the bawler is a kind of a ribald.; sent8 -> int6: the bawler is a kind of renewable thing that is not untidy if it is a ribald.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bawler is not unrenewable and is not untidy.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the fact that the kamikaze is not a lordship is correct.; sent3 -> int9: the kamikaze is not Soviets if it is not a kind of a lordship.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__