the shuffleboard and the glamorizing Toulouse happens.
sent1: the fact that the concretizing alveolar does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: if the striking pipet does not occur then the concretizing alveolar does not occur and the old occurs. sent3: if the concretizing alveolar does not occur the glamorizing putrescine occurs. sent4: if the old does not occur the fact that the shuffleboard and the glamorizing Toulouse occurs is incorrect. sent5: if the concretizing alveolar does not occur then the glamorizing putrescine occurs but the concretizing uniformed does not occur. sent6: if that the overexertion occurs is not false that the glamorizing putrescine occurs and the concretizing uniformed does not occur is false. sent7: the broadcasting does not occur if that the broadcasting and the compulsion occurs is wrong. sent8: the non-oldness is triggered by that the unenthusiasticness does not occur and the broadcasting happens. sent9: if the overexertion does not occur both the non-unenthusiasticness and the broadcasting occurs. sent10: if the broadcasting does not occur then the shuffleboard happens and the unenthusiasticness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the overexertion happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the glamorizing putrescine occurs and the concretizing uniformed does not occur is false.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the glamorizing putrescine happens and the concretizing uniformed does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the overexertion does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the non-unenthusiasticness and the broadcasting happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the old does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the shuffleboard happens and the glamorizing Toulouse occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the shuffleboard and the glamorizing Toulouse happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the concretizing alveolar does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: if the striking pipet does not occur then the concretizing alveolar does not occur and the old occurs. sent3: if the concretizing alveolar does not occur the glamorizing putrescine occurs. sent4: if the old does not occur the fact that the shuffleboard and the glamorizing Toulouse occurs is incorrect. sent5: if the concretizing alveolar does not occur then the glamorizing putrescine occurs but the concretizing uniformed does not occur. sent6: if that the overexertion occurs is not false that the glamorizing putrescine occurs and the concretizing uniformed does not occur is false. sent7: the broadcasting does not occur if that the broadcasting and the compulsion occurs is wrong. sent8: the non-oldness is triggered by that the unenthusiasticness does not occur and the broadcasting happens. sent9: if the overexertion does not occur both the non-unenthusiasticness and the broadcasting occurs. sent10: if the broadcasting does not occur then the shuffleboard happens and the unenthusiasticness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the overexertion happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the glamorizing putrescine occurs and the concretizing uniformed does not occur is false.; sent5 & sent1 -> int2: the glamorizing putrescine happens and the concretizing uniformed does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the overexertion does not occur.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the non-unenthusiasticness and the broadcasting happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the old does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__