the myope is not scorbutic and not rentable.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a throbbing then the fact that it is not osteal and is not an outline is not correct. sent2: the myope is unrentable but not osteal. sent3: the pedometer stills smorgasbord. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it letters WAC and stills smorgasbord is false. sent5: the gemsbok is not a kind of a Jerusalem. sent6: something is not a littoral if the fact that it is not an outline and it is a littoral is false. sent7: something is not rentable if it does not still smorgasbord. sent8: the fact that the myope is unrentable thing that is not nonsectarian is right. sent9: the myope does letter WAC. sent10: the pedometer does not letter WAC if the gemsbok is an outline. sent11: that the pedometer is not nonsectarian and does throb is false if it does not letter WAC. sent12: if something is a Jerusalem it does throb. sent13: the pedometer does not letter WAC. sent14: if the pedometer does not still smorgasbord the myope is not a kind of a Jerusalem. sent15: the challah is not rentable and is not salty. sent16: the pedometer does not letter WAC if there exists something such that that it letter WAC and does still smorgasbord does not hold. sent17: the gemsbok is not an outline if it is not rentable. sent18: a non-osteal thing is not nonsectarian. sent19: if there exists something such that it does not reset assisted the pedometer is a Jerusalem. sent20: the bedstead does not still smorgasbord. sent21: the myope does not still smorgasbord if the gemsbok is not nonsectarian. sent22: the myope does not still legislatorship. sent23: something is not scorbutic and is not rentable if that it does not still smorgasbord is correct. sent24: the gemsbok is not scorbutic. sent25: if the gemsbok is osteal the fact that it is an outline hold. sent26: there exists something such that it does not reset assisted. sent27: if that something is both not osteal and not an outline is not right then it is rentable. sent28: if the gemsbok is a kind of an outline then the pedometer does not letter WAC and it is not a kind of a throbbing.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gemsbok is osteal.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the gemsbok is an outline.; int1 & sent28 -> int2: the pedometer does not letter WAC and it is not a throbbing.; int2 -> int3: that the pedometer does not throb is right.; sent12 -> int4: if the pedometer is a kind of a Jerusalem it is a kind of a throbbing.; sent26 & sent19 -> int5: the pedometer is a Jerusalem.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pedometer does throb.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the gemsbok is not osteal.; sent18 -> int9: the gemsbok is not nonsectarian if it is non-osteal.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the gemsbok is not nonsectarian.; int10 & sent21 -> int11: the myope does not still smorgasbord.; sent23 -> int12: if the myope does not still smorgasbord it is not scorbutic and it is not rentable.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is not a kind of a littoral.
sent6 -> int13: the fact that if that the pedometer is not the outline but littoral is not right then the pedometer is not a littoral is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the myope is not scorbutic and not rentable. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a throbbing then the fact that it is not osteal and is not an outline is not correct. sent2: the myope is unrentable but not osteal. sent3: the pedometer stills smorgasbord. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it letters WAC and stills smorgasbord is false. sent5: the gemsbok is not a kind of a Jerusalem. sent6: something is not a littoral if the fact that it is not an outline and it is a littoral is false. sent7: something is not rentable if it does not still smorgasbord. sent8: the fact that the myope is unrentable thing that is not nonsectarian is right. sent9: the myope does letter WAC. sent10: the pedometer does not letter WAC if the gemsbok is an outline. sent11: that the pedometer is not nonsectarian and does throb is false if it does not letter WAC. sent12: if something is a Jerusalem it does throb. sent13: the pedometer does not letter WAC. sent14: if the pedometer does not still smorgasbord the myope is not a kind of a Jerusalem. sent15: the challah is not rentable and is not salty. sent16: the pedometer does not letter WAC if there exists something such that that it letter WAC and does still smorgasbord does not hold. sent17: the gemsbok is not an outline if it is not rentable. sent18: a non-osteal thing is not nonsectarian. sent19: if there exists something such that it does not reset assisted the pedometer is a Jerusalem. sent20: the bedstead does not still smorgasbord. sent21: the myope does not still smorgasbord if the gemsbok is not nonsectarian. sent22: the myope does not still legislatorship. sent23: something is not scorbutic and is not rentable if that it does not still smorgasbord is correct. sent24: the gemsbok is not scorbutic. sent25: if the gemsbok is osteal the fact that it is an outline hold. sent26: there exists something such that it does not reset assisted. sent27: if that something is both not osteal and not an outline is not right then it is rentable. sent28: if the gemsbok is a kind of an outline then the pedometer does not letter WAC and it is not a kind of a throbbing. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gemsbok is osteal.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the gemsbok is an outline.; int1 & sent28 -> int2: the pedometer does not letter WAC and it is not a throbbing.; int2 -> int3: that the pedometer does not throb is right.; sent12 -> int4: if the pedometer is a kind of a Jerusalem it is a kind of a throbbing.; sent26 & sent19 -> int5: the pedometer is a Jerusalem.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pedometer does throb.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the gemsbok is not osteal.; sent18 -> int9: the gemsbok is not nonsectarian if it is non-osteal.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the gemsbok is not nonsectarian.; int10 & sent21 -> int11: the myope does not still smorgasbord.; sent23 -> int12: if the myope does not still smorgasbord it is not scorbutic and it is not rentable.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__