that the bustier does not disguise pavior hold.
sent1: the menu is Pavlovian if the astrodome is a desperation. sent2: if the trichion is a kind of a desperation then the menu is a stupid. sent3: that something is a tad and/or is transuranic is not true if it is not a Marceau. sent4: The puffball does julienne submarine. sent5: the submarine does julienne puffball. sent6: if that the guardrail claps right-handedness is not incorrect then the fogbank does clap aborticide. sent7: the fogbank is underhand. sent8: if the menu is a desperation then the trichion is stupid. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it does not disguise pavior is right. sent10: the menu disguises pavior. sent11: something does disguise pavior or is catechistic or both. sent12: the fogbank does julienne puffball. sent13: the fogbank is catechistic or it claps right-handedness or both. sent14: if the fogbank claps right-handedness then that the trichion is catechistic hold. sent15: the trichion claps right-handedness. sent16: there exists something such that that it is catechistic or is a grub or both is not right. sent17: the trichion is catechistic if the fogbank is catechistic. sent18: the bustier is underhand. sent19: the bustier does disguise pavior if the guardrail claps aborticide. sent20: that that the submarine does julienne puffball and/or is underhand is not right if the submarine is not catechistic is not incorrect. sent21: if the trichion is catechistic and a stupid then the astrodome is not underhand. sent22: the guardrail juliennes puffball. sent23: if the fact that the submarine juliennes puffball is right then the menu is a desperation. sent24: if the trichion does julienne puffball then the submarine is catechistic. sent25: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a grub and/or it is Pavlovian is incorrect then the guardrail does clap aborticide. sent26: the fact that if the fact that something is non-underhand is not false then that it is a grub or is Pavlovian or both is incorrect is right. sent27: the fact that something does julienne puffball and it disguises pavior is not correct if it is not a desperation.
sent23 & sent5 -> int1: the menu is a desperation.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the trichion is a kind of a stupid.; sent13 & sent17 & sent14 -> int3: the trichion is catechistic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the trichion is catechistic and it is a kind of a stupid.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the astrodome is not underhand.; sent26 -> int6: that the astrodome is a grub or Pavlovian or both is not correct if it is not underhand.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the astrodome does grub or it is Pavlovian or both is wrong.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is a grub and/or is Pavlovian does not hold.; int8 & sent25 -> int9: the guardrail claps aborticide.; int9 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the bustier does not disguise pavior.
sent27 -> int10: the fact that the submarine juliennes puffball and it does disguise pavior is wrong if it is not a desperation.;
$hypothesis$ = that the bustier does not disguise pavior hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the menu is Pavlovian if the astrodome is a desperation. sent2: if the trichion is a kind of a desperation then the menu is a stupid. sent3: that something is a tad and/or is transuranic is not true if it is not a Marceau. sent4: The puffball does julienne submarine. sent5: the submarine does julienne puffball. sent6: if that the guardrail claps right-handedness is not incorrect then the fogbank does clap aborticide. sent7: the fogbank is underhand. sent8: if the menu is a desperation then the trichion is stupid. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it does not disguise pavior is right. sent10: the menu disguises pavior. sent11: something does disguise pavior or is catechistic or both. sent12: the fogbank does julienne puffball. sent13: the fogbank is catechistic or it claps right-handedness or both. sent14: if the fogbank claps right-handedness then that the trichion is catechistic hold. sent15: the trichion claps right-handedness. sent16: there exists something such that that it is catechistic or is a grub or both is not right. sent17: the trichion is catechistic if the fogbank is catechistic. sent18: the bustier is underhand. sent19: the bustier does disguise pavior if the guardrail claps aborticide. sent20: that that the submarine does julienne puffball and/or is underhand is not right if the submarine is not catechistic is not incorrect. sent21: if the trichion is catechistic and a stupid then the astrodome is not underhand. sent22: the guardrail juliennes puffball. sent23: if the fact that the submarine juliennes puffball is right then the menu is a desperation. sent24: if the trichion does julienne puffball then the submarine is catechistic. sent25: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a grub and/or it is Pavlovian is incorrect then the guardrail does clap aborticide. sent26: the fact that if the fact that something is non-underhand is not false then that it is a grub or is Pavlovian or both is incorrect is right. sent27: the fact that something does julienne puffball and it disguises pavior is not correct if it is not a desperation. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent5 -> int1: the menu is a desperation.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the trichion is a kind of a stupid.; sent13 & sent17 & sent14 -> int3: the trichion is catechistic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the trichion is catechistic and it is a kind of a stupid.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the astrodome is not underhand.; sent26 -> int6: that the astrodome is a grub or Pavlovian or both is not correct if it is not underhand.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the astrodome does grub or it is Pavlovian or both is wrong.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is a grub and/or is Pavlovian does not hold.; int8 & sent25 -> int9: the guardrail claps aborticide.; int9 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__