there is something such that if it is a sedulity then that it is not legato and it is a lota does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it premeditates bacteriochlorophyll it is not a chrism and it is weedy. sent2: there is something such that if it is palatoglossal it is not a kind of a mull and is a kind of a electrolyte. sent3: if the bacteriochlorophyll is a sedulity it is not legato and it is a lota. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a sedulity the fact that it is legato a lota is not true. sent5: something is not legato but it is a lota if it is a sedulity. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a paperback the fact that it is not a gipsywort and is a savarin is correct. sent7: if something is a sedulity the fact that it is not non-legato and it is a lota does not hold. sent8: that the bacteriochlorophyll is legato thing that is a lota is not right if it is a kind of a sedulity.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a sedulity then that it is not legato and it is a lota does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it premeditates bacteriochlorophyll it is not a chrism and it is weedy. sent2: there is something such that if it is palatoglossal it is not a kind of a mull and is a kind of a electrolyte. sent3: if the bacteriochlorophyll is a sedulity it is not legato and it is a lota. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a sedulity the fact that it is legato a lota is not true. sent5: something is not legato but it is a lota if it is a sedulity. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a paperback the fact that it is not a gipsywort and is a savarin is correct. sent7: if something is a sedulity the fact that it is not non-legato and it is a lota does not hold. sent8: that the bacteriochlorophyll is legato thing that is a lota is not right if it is a kind of a sedulity. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__