that the dimethylglyoxime does not slash but it is proprioceptive is true.
sent1: the diflunisal is not proprioceptive if the dimethylglyoxime does not hug airship. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of non-former thing that does not hug vower is not true if it is not proprioceptive. sent3: that if the bachelor is a former then the diflunisal is a keeper is not false. sent4: if the bachelor hugs airship then the snob is not a keeper. sent5: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Pekinese and it does not hug airship is false it is not a kind of a keeper. sent6: if something is not a keeper then it is both former and a slashed. sent7: the diflunisal is former. sent8: if the diflunisal does snuffle Hemigalus then the fact that it is not a kind of a Pekinese and does not hug airship does not hold. sent9: if the snob is not proprioceptive then the dimethylglyoxime does not slash but it is proprioceptive. sent10: The Hemigalus does snuffle diflunisal. sent11: that the diflunisal is a Pekinese and does not hug airship is wrong. sent12: if the snob is proprioceptive then the bachelor is a former.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snob is not non-proprioceptive.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the bachelor is a former.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the diflunisal is not a kind of a keeper is not right.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the diflunisal is not a Pekinese and it does not hug airship is incorrect then it is not a kind of a keeper.;
that the dimethylglyoxime does not slash but it is proprioceptive is not correct.
sent6 -> int4: the snob is former and it does slash if it is not a keeper.;
$hypothesis$ = that the dimethylglyoxime does not slash but it is proprioceptive is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the diflunisal is not proprioceptive if the dimethylglyoxime does not hug airship. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of non-former thing that does not hug vower is not true if it is not proprioceptive. sent3: that if the bachelor is a former then the diflunisal is a keeper is not false. sent4: if the bachelor hugs airship then the snob is not a keeper. sent5: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Pekinese and it does not hug airship is false it is not a kind of a keeper. sent6: if something is not a keeper then it is both former and a slashed. sent7: the diflunisal is former. sent8: if the diflunisal does snuffle Hemigalus then the fact that it is not a kind of a Pekinese and does not hug airship does not hold. sent9: if the snob is not proprioceptive then the dimethylglyoxime does not slash but it is proprioceptive. sent10: The Hemigalus does snuffle diflunisal. sent11: that the diflunisal is a Pekinese and does not hug airship is wrong. sent12: if the snob is proprioceptive then the bachelor is a former. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snob is not non-proprioceptive.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the bachelor is a former.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the diflunisal is not a kind of a keeper is not right.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the diflunisal is not a Pekinese and it does not hug airship is incorrect then it is not a kind of a keeper.; __UNKNOWN__