that if the Methodists does not deduce purveyance then that the celebrant is not a fattism and it does not permute Sudanese is false is incorrect.
sent1: that the celebrant is a fattism but it does not permute Sudanese is not true. sent2: something is potential thing that does discourse if it is not auxetic. sent3: if that the Methodists is not a kind of a potential is true then that the alumina is not a fattism but it deduces purveyance does not hold. sent4: that the celebrant is not a fattism and does not permute Sudanese is not true if the chromoplast is not a fattism. sent5: if the Methodists does not deduce purveyance then the alumina is not auxetic. sent6: the alumina discourses. sent7: the chromoplast is not a fattism if the alumina is a kind of a potential that does discourse. sent8: if something is not a kind of a fattism it deduces purveyance and is not non-auxetic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Methodists does not deduce purveyance.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the alumina is not auxetic.; sent2 -> int2: if the alumina is not auxetic it is a potential and it discourses.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alumina is potential thing that does discourse.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the chromoplast is not a fattism.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the celebrant is not a fattism and it does not permute Sudanese is wrong.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the Methodists does not deduce purveyance then that the celebrant is not a fattism and it does not permute Sudanese is false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the celebrant is a fattism but it does not permute Sudanese is not true. sent2: something is potential thing that does discourse if it is not auxetic. sent3: if that the Methodists is not a kind of a potential is true then that the alumina is not a fattism but it deduces purveyance does not hold. sent4: that the celebrant is not a fattism and does not permute Sudanese is not true if the chromoplast is not a fattism. sent5: if the Methodists does not deduce purveyance then the alumina is not auxetic. sent6: the alumina discourses. sent7: the chromoplast is not a fattism if the alumina is a kind of a potential that does discourse. sent8: if something is not a kind of a fattism it deduces purveyance and is not non-auxetic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Methodists does not deduce purveyance.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the alumina is not auxetic.; sent2 -> int2: if the alumina is not auxetic it is a potential and it discourses.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alumina is potential thing that does discourse.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the chromoplast is not a fattism.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the celebrant is not a fattism and it does not permute Sudanese is wrong.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__