that there exists something such that if it does not propagate that it is a soberness or it is a kind of a rejuvenation or both does not hold is wrong.
sent1: if the cosmography does not propagate then the fact that the fact that it is a soberness and/or it is a rejuvenation hold is not right. sent2: that something is a sunrise and/or it is gaseous does not hold if it does not infix Tahitian. sent3: there is something such that if that it is not anarchistic is correct then it is not a welt. sent4: the fact that the kingbolt is microsomal or is a biplane or both does not hold if it propagates.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
that there is something such that if it does not infix Tahitian that it is a kind of a sunrise and/or it is gaseous is incorrect is right.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the cittern either is a sunrise or is gaseous or both is not right if it does not infix Tahitian.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not propagate that it is a soberness or it is a kind of a rejuvenation or both does not hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cosmography does not propagate then the fact that the fact that it is a soberness and/or it is a rejuvenation hold is not right. sent2: that something is a sunrise and/or it is gaseous does not hold if it does not infix Tahitian. sent3: there is something such that if that it is not anarchistic is correct then it is not a welt. sent4: the fact that the kingbolt is microsomal or is a biplane or both does not hold if it propagates. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__