that there exists something such that if it is inconspicuous thing that is not athletic it does not lecture Uralic is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is inconspicuous and not athletic it does lecture Uralic. sent2: the muckraker does not admonish if it is a copyright and it is not inconspicuous. sent3: there exists something such that if it escalates and it does not theologize it is a Mycenae. sent4: if the muckraker is a teg that is a stacker it is not genitourinary. sent5: if the muckraker does lecture Uralic and is a ISI then it is not a straight-arm. sent6: a journalistic thing that is not a arsenical is not a kind of a Nanning. sent7: if the muckraker is inconspicuous but it is not athletic then it does not lecture Uralic. sent8: the muckraker does lecture Uralic if it is a kind of inconspicuous thing that is not athletic. sent9: something is not a Nanning if it is a Ledum and it is not a kind of a ISI. sent10: there exists something such that if it backstops muckraker and does palatalize Stockholm then it is not an assessment. sent11: if the dominion is a Mycenae that does lecture Uralic then it is not a fine. sent12: if the muckraker is unprovocative and a Ladyship then the fact that it is not inconspicuous is true.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is journalistic and it is not a arsenical the fact that it is not a Nanning is correct.
sent6 -> int1: the G is not a Nanning if it is journalistic and non-arsenical.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is inconspicuous thing that is not athletic it does not lecture Uralic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is inconspicuous and not athletic it does lecture Uralic. sent2: the muckraker does not admonish if it is a copyright and it is not inconspicuous. sent3: there exists something such that if it escalates and it does not theologize it is a Mycenae. sent4: if the muckraker is a teg that is a stacker it is not genitourinary. sent5: if the muckraker does lecture Uralic and is a ISI then it is not a straight-arm. sent6: a journalistic thing that is not a arsenical is not a kind of a Nanning. sent7: if the muckraker is inconspicuous but it is not athletic then it does not lecture Uralic. sent8: the muckraker does lecture Uralic if it is a kind of inconspicuous thing that is not athletic. sent9: something is not a Nanning if it is a Ledum and it is not a kind of a ISI. sent10: there exists something such that if it backstops muckraker and does palatalize Stockholm then it is not an assessment. sent11: if the dominion is a Mycenae that does lecture Uralic then it is not a fine. sent12: if the muckraker is unprovocative and a Ladyship then the fact that it is not inconspicuous is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__