the bicycling obviousness occurs and the advisableness happens.
sent1: if the contesting occurs or the brightening happens or both then the moot does not occur. sent2: the fact that the fact that both the neocolonialism and the kwanza happens is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: the fact that that the singling pyrilamine does not occur and the ingraining occurs is not right is not false. sent4: the junket happens and the brightening happens. sent5: the patterning Yahweh happens if the moot does not occur. sent6: if the sowing does not occur then both the singling maillot and the glomerularness occurs. sent7: if the granuliferousness does not occur the fact that the bicycling obviousness happens and the advisableness happens is incorrect. sent8: if the patterning Yahweh occurs then the cercarialness occurs. sent9: if both the singling maillot and the cercarialness occurs then the granuliferousness does not occur. sent10: if that the singling pyrilamine does not occur and the ingraining occurs is not true the fact that the sow does not occur hold.
sent4 -> int1: the brightening happens.; int1 -> int2: either the contest happens or the brightening occurs or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the moot does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the patterning Yahweh occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the cercarialness occurs.; sent10 & sent3 -> int6: the sowing does not occur.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the singling maillot occurs and the glomerularness happens.; int7 -> int8: the singling maillot happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: both the singling maillot and the cercarialness happens.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: that the granuliferousness does not occur hold.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bicycling obviousness occurs and the advisableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the contesting occurs or the brightening happens or both then the moot does not occur. sent2: the fact that the fact that both the neocolonialism and the kwanza happens is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: the fact that that the singling pyrilamine does not occur and the ingraining occurs is not right is not false. sent4: the junket happens and the brightening happens. sent5: the patterning Yahweh happens if the moot does not occur. sent6: if the sowing does not occur then both the singling maillot and the glomerularness occurs. sent7: if the granuliferousness does not occur the fact that the bicycling obviousness happens and the advisableness happens is incorrect. sent8: if the patterning Yahweh occurs then the cercarialness occurs. sent9: if both the singling maillot and the cercarialness occurs then the granuliferousness does not occur. sent10: if that the singling pyrilamine does not occur and the ingraining occurs is not true the fact that the sow does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the brightening happens.; int1 -> int2: either the contest happens or the brightening occurs or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the moot does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the patterning Yahweh occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the cercarialness occurs.; sent10 & sent3 -> int6: the sowing does not occur.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the singling maillot occurs and the glomerularness happens.; int7 -> int8: the singling maillot happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: both the singling maillot and the cercarialness happens.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: that the granuliferousness does not occur hold.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__