that the breeze does not rendezvous huff but it is pessimistic is not right.
sent1: the staggerbush is not closed-circuit but it is not non-ideal if the groupie does drag. sent2: if that something is not uncleared and does not harvest does not hold then it does not rendezvous huff. sent3: if that the logwood is not acetic is correct that the breeze is cleared thing that is not a kind of a harvest is wrong. sent4: the logwood is not a kind of a Skinnerian. sent5: if the breeze is not a neurosurgery that it does not rendezvous huff and is pessimistic is not true. sent6: if the fact that the groupie is a kind of a neurosurgery is not incorrect the fact that it does not perfect is true. sent7: the breeze is pessimistic if the quackgrass is a kind of a scandalousness. sent8: the quackgrass is a kind of a Skinnerian. sent9: if the breeze is uncleared it does not rendezvous huff. sent10: if the staggerbush is a kind of non-closed-circuit thing that is a kind of an ideal then the logwood is not acetic. sent11: the fact that the breeze is uncleared but it does not harvest is not right if the logwood is not acetic. sent12: the staggerbush is an ideal. sent13: that the groupie is a neurosurgery is right. sent14: the quackgrass is both a scandalousness and not non-Skinnerian. sent15: if the groupie is acetic then that it is not closed-circuit and it is a kind of an ideal is not correct. sent16: if the groupie is a neurosurgery it is not perfect and it does drag. sent17: something is not a kind of a neurosurgery if it is not a neurosurgery or closed-circuit or both. sent18: if something is not a neurosurgery then it is a papaw that does pleach consubstantiation. sent19: something is acetic if the fact that it is a harvest is correct. sent20: something does not rendezvous huff if it is uncleared.
sent16 & sent13 -> int1: the groupie is not perfect but a drag.; int1 -> int2: the groupie does drag.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the staggerbush is not closed-circuit but ideal.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the logwood is not acetic hold.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the breeze is not uncleared and it is not a kind of a harvest is not right.; sent2 -> int6: if that the breeze is not uncleared and not a harvest is wrong it does not rendezvous huff.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the breeze does not rendezvous huff.; sent14 -> int8: the quackgrass is a scandalousness.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the breeze is not non-pessimistic.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the breeze does not rendezvous huff and is pessimistic is not right.
sent17 -> int10: the breeze is not a neurosurgery if it is not a neurosurgery or it is closed-circuit or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the breeze does not rendezvous huff but it is pessimistic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the staggerbush is not closed-circuit but it is not non-ideal if the groupie does drag. sent2: if that something is not uncleared and does not harvest does not hold then it does not rendezvous huff. sent3: if that the logwood is not acetic is correct that the breeze is cleared thing that is not a kind of a harvest is wrong. sent4: the logwood is not a kind of a Skinnerian. sent5: if the breeze is not a neurosurgery that it does not rendezvous huff and is pessimistic is not true. sent6: if the fact that the groupie is a kind of a neurosurgery is not incorrect the fact that it does not perfect is true. sent7: the breeze is pessimistic if the quackgrass is a kind of a scandalousness. sent8: the quackgrass is a kind of a Skinnerian. sent9: if the breeze is uncleared it does not rendezvous huff. sent10: if the staggerbush is a kind of non-closed-circuit thing that is a kind of an ideal then the logwood is not acetic. sent11: the fact that the breeze is uncleared but it does not harvest is not right if the logwood is not acetic. sent12: the staggerbush is an ideal. sent13: that the groupie is a neurosurgery is right. sent14: the quackgrass is both a scandalousness and not non-Skinnerian. sent15: if the groupie is acetic then that it is not closed-circuit and it is a kind of an ideal is not correct. sent16: if the groupie is a neurosurgery it is not perfect and it does drag. sent17: something is not a kind of a neurosurgery if it is not a neurosurgery or closed-circuit or both. sent18: if something is not a neurosurgery then it is a papaw that does pleach consubstantiation. sent19: something is acetic if the fact that it is a harvest is correct. sent20: something does not rendezvous huff if it is uncleared. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent13 -> int1: the groupie is not perfect but a drag.; int1 -> int2: the groupie does drag.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the staggerbush is not closed-circuit but ideal.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the logwood is not acetic hold.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the breeze is not uncleared and it is not a kind of a harvest is not right.; sent2 -> int6: if that the breeze is not uncleared and not a harvest is wrong it does not rendezvous huff.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the breeze does not rendezvous huff.; sent14 -> int8: the quackgrass is a scandalousness.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the breeze is not non-pessimistic.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__