there is something such that if it is not an inactivation and it is not many it is not Bogartian.
sent1: the xeranthemum is not a Cushitic if that it is a kind of non-many thing that is not amphitropous hold. sent2: if the xeranthemum is not a aminopyrine and it is not many it is not a kind of a gulping. sent3: there is something such that if it is an inactivation and it is not many then it is non-Bogartian. sent4: if a non-ciliate thing does not individuate Shrovetide it is not portable. sent5: the xeranthemum is not Bogartian if it is not an inactivation and not many. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a consul and is not a kind of a January it is instructional. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an inactivation and is not many it is Bogartian. sent8: if the xeranthemum is not a extropy and it is not many then it is not a agave. sent9: there is something such that if it is not carnivorous but non-pericardial then that it is not a amberbell is not incorrect. sent10: if the xeranthemum is not an inactivation and is many then it is not Bogartian. sent11: there is something such that if it is not ratlike and it kidnaps Solanum then it is not a casino.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a ciliate and it does not individuate Shrovetide then it is not a kind of a portable.
sent4 -> int1: the plankton is not a portable if it is non-ciliate thing that does not individuate Shrovetide.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not an inactivation and it is not many it is not Bogartian. ; $context$ = sent1: the xeranthemum is not a Cushitic if that it is a kind of non-many thing that is not amphitropous hold. sent2: if the xeranthemum is not a aminopyrine and it is not many it is not a kind of a gulping. sent3: there is something such that if it is an inactivation and it is not many then it is non-Bogartian. sent4: if a non-ciliate thing does not individuate Shrovetide it is not portable. sent5: the xeranthemum is not Bogartian if it is not an inactivation and not many. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a consul and is not a kind of a January it is instructional. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an inactivation and is not many it is Bogartian. sent8: if the xeranthemum is not a extropy and it is not many then it is not a agave. sent9: there is something such that if it is not carnivorous but non-pericardial then that it is not a amberbell is not incorrect. sent10: if the xeranthemum is not an inactivation and is many then it is not Bogartian. sent11: there is something such that if it is not ratlike and it kidnaps Solanum then it is not a casino. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__