the paneling is a kind of a bulk.
sent1: if something exempts asthmatic that it does not clean title and is paramagnetic is not true. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does clean diamine and is a kind of a stranger does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not retentive that the mouthpiece does bulk and does clean concavity does not hold. sent4: if that something exempts stupid and does clean title hold then the paneling is a kind of a bulk. sent5: if the fact that something is not a kind of a seagrass and is not fugal is not right then it is not a kind of a igniter. sent6: if something is paramagnetic it does clean title. sent7: there is something such that it cleans title. sent8: the paneling is not arbitrative. sent9: that the stupid is not a kind of a seagrass and is not fugal is not right. sent10: if there exists something such that that it does clean diamine and is a stranger is not correct the stupid is not a stranger. sent11: the overprint is Senegalese if the fact that that the stupid does not clean title and is paramagnetic is correct is false. sent12: the codefendant is a Senegalese. sent13: if the fact that the paneling is a bulk and not paramagnetic is correct the mouthpiece does not clean concavity. sent14: if the mouthpiece is retentive and does not exempt stupid then the codefendant is not a Senegalese. sent15: the mouthpiece does putt but it is not a kind of a skateboard. sent16: the paneling is unretentive. sent17: if the fact that the mouthpiece does not clean concavity and it is not retentive is not true then the paneling does exempt stupid. sent18: something does clean concavity if it does exempt stupid. sent19: the mouthpiece is paramagnetic. sent20: if the overprint either is not non-Senegalese or exempts stupid or both the codefendant is not retentive. sent21: if something that is not a kind of a igniter is not a stranger then it does exempt asthmatic. sent22: something does exempt stupid. sent23: that the velociraptor is client-server a Senegalese is true. sent24: the mouthpiece does clean concavity.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mouthpiece does not exempt stupid.; sent6 -> int1: the mouthpiece does clean title if it is paramagnetic.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the mouthpiece cleans title.;
the paneling does not bulk.
sent1 -> int3: the fact that the stupid does not clean title but it is paramagnetic is not right if it exempts asthmatic.; sent21 -> int4: the stupid does exempt asthmatic if it is not a igniter and is not a stranger.; sent5 -> int5: the fact that the stupid is not a igniter hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a seagrass and it is not fugal is not right.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the stupid is not a kind of a igniter.; sent2 & sent10 -> int7: the stupid is not a stranger.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the stupid is not a igniter and it is not a stranger.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the stupid does exempt asthmatic.; int3 & int9 -> int10: that the stupid does not clean title but it is paramagnetic is false.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: the overprint is a kind of a Senegalese.; int11 -> int12: the overprint is a Senegalese and/or it exempts stupid.; sent20 & int12 -> int13: the codefendant is not retentive.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not retentive.; int14 & sent3 -> int15: that the mouthpiece is a bulk and does clean concavity does not hold.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it is a bulk and it cleans concavity does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the paneling is a kind of a bulk. ; $context$ = sent1: if something exempts asthmatic that it does not clean title and is paramagnetic is not true. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it does clean diamine and is a kind of a stranger does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not retentive that the mouthpiece does bulk and does clean concavity does not hold. sent4: if that something exempts stupid and does clean title hold then the paneling is a kind of a bulk. sent5: if the fact that something is not a kind of a seagrass and is not fugal is not right then it is not a kind of a igniter. sent6: if something is paramagnetic it does clean title. sent7: there is something such that it cleans title. sent8: the paneling is not arbitrative. sent9: that the stupid is not a kind of a seagrass and is not fugal is not right. sent10: if there exists something such that that it does clean diamine and is a stranger is not correct the stupid is not a stranger. sent11: the overprint is Senegalese if the fact that that the stupid does not clean title and is paramagnetic is correct is false. sent12: the codefendant is a Senegalese. sent13: if the fact that the paneling is a bulk and not paramagnetic is correct the mouthpiece does not clean concavity. sent14: if the mouthpiece is retentive and does not exempt stupid then the codefendant is not a Senegalese. sent15: the mouthpiece does putt but it is not a kind of a skateboard. sent16: the paneling is unretentive. sent17: if the fact that the mouthpiece does not clean concavity and it is not retentive is not true then the paneling does exempt stupid. sent18: something does clean concavity if it does exempt stupid. sent19: the mouthpiece is paramagnetic. sent20: if the overprint either is not non-Senegalese or exempts stupid or both the codefendant is not retentive. sent21: if something that is not a kind of a igniter is not a stranger then it does exempt asthmatic. sent22: something does exempt stupid. sent23: that the velociraptor is client-server a Senegalese is true. sent24: the mouthpiece does clean concavity. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mouthpiece does not exempt stupid.; sent6 -> int1: the mouthpiece does clean title if it is paramagnetic.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the mouthpiece cleans title.; __UNKNOWN__