the grasping linecut occurs but the annunciatoriness does not occur.
sent1: the glazing posthouse does not occur. sent2: the unpretentiousness happens. sent3: the calcicolousness does not occur. sent4: the collectivization does not occur. sent5: that the grasping alundum happens and the debacle occurs causes the non-monoclinicness. sent6: if the monoclinicness does not occur the annunciatoriness does not occur. sent7: the destructing does not occur and the resting happens. sent8: the debacle happens and the grasping vandyke happens if that the quantitativeness does not occur is true. sent9: the annelidness does not occur. sent10: that the epilation occurs and the scarring does not occur is brought about by that the dialectic does not occur. sent11: the grasping linecut and the annunciatoriness occurs if the grasping vandyke does not occur. sent12: the ogling saltire does not occur if the debacle does not occur but the grasping alundum occurs. sent13: if the prorogation does not occur then the unpretentiousness does not occur. sent14: if the scarring does not occur the fact that both the non-analness and the packaging occurs is not correct. sent15: if the monoclinicness does not occur then both the grasping linecut and the non-annunciatoriness occurs. sent16: the fact that the closure does not occur but the nonslipperiness happens is wrong. sent17: that the skunk occurs and the grudge happens is wrong. sent18: that both the counterespionage and the non-calcicolousness occurs is brought about by that the withdrawal does not occur. sent19: that the grasping vandyke happens is right if the quantitativeness does not occur. sent20: the quantitativeness does not occur. sent21: the triangulation does not occur and the grasping cyclobenzaprine occurs. sent22: the fact that the viralness occurs is not wrong. sent23: that the Mongolian does not occur is not incorrect. sent24: the withdrawal leads to that the quantitativeness does not occur and the grasping vandyke does not occur. sent25: the anteriorness occurs but the mot does not occur. sent26: if the fact that the fact that the grasping alundum happens is false is right that not the destructing but the rest happens is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grasping alundum does not occur.; sent26 & assump1 -> int1: that the destructing does not occur but the resting occurs is not right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the grasping alundum happens.; sent8 & sent20 -> int4: the debacle happens and the grasping vandyke occurs.; int4 -> int5: the debacle occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the grasping alundum happens and the debacle occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: that the monoclinicness does not occur hold.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the grasping linecut and the non-annunciatoriness happens is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the grasping linecut occurs but the annunciatoriness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the glazing posthouse does not occur. sent2: the unpretentiousness happens. sent3: the calcicolousness does not occur. sent4: the collectivization does not occur. sent5: that the grasping alundum happens and the debacle occurs causes the non-monoclinicness. sent6: if the monoclinicness does not occur the annunciatoriness does not occur. sent7: the destructing does not occur and the resting happens. sent8: the debacle happens and the grasping vandyke happens if that the quantitativeness does not occur is true. sent9: the annelidness does not occur. sent10: that the epilation occurs and the scarring does not occur is brought about by that the dialectic does not occur. sent11: the grasping linecut and the annunciatoriness occurs if the grasping vandyke does not occur. sent12: the ogling saltire does not occur if the debacle does not occur but the grasping alundum occurs. sent13: if the prorogation does not occur then the unpretentiousness does not occur. sent14: if the scarring does not occur the fact that both the non-analness and the packaging occurs is not correct. sent15: if the monoclinicness does not occur then both the grasping linecut and the non-annunciatoriness occurs. sent16: the fact that the closure does not occur but the nonslipperiness happens is wrong. sent17: that the skunk occurs and the grudge happens is wrong. sent18: that both the counterespionage and the non-calcicolousness occurs is brought about by that the withdrawal does not occur. sent19: that the grasping vandyke happens is right if the quantitativeness does not occur. sent20: the quantitativeness does not occur. sent21: the triangulation does not occur and the grasping cyclobenzaprine occurs. sent22: the fact that the viralness occurs is not wrong. sent23: that the Mongolian does not occur is not incorrect. sent24: the withdrawal leads to that the quantitativeness does not occur and the grasping vandyke does not occur. sent25: the anteriorness occurs but the mot does not occur. sent26: if the fact that the fact that the grasping alundum happens is false is right that not the destructing but the rest happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grasping alundum does not occur.; sent26 & assump1 -> int1: that the destructing does not occur but the resting occurs is not right.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the grasping alundum happens.; sent8 & sent20 -> int4: the debacle happens and the grasping vandyke occurs.; int4 -> int5: the debacle occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the grasping alundum happens and the debacle occurs.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: that the monoclinicness does not occur hold.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__