there exists something such that if it trusses protege it is not negligent and is a moiety.
sent1: if there is something such that it does taste recusation then the Mandaean is equal and not cardiopulmonary. sent2: something is not philanthropic if that either it is not phonetics or it is not insignificant or both is wrong. sent3: the father is a chalaza and it is a moiety if there exists something such that it is not philanthropic. sent4: if something is not a kind of a denotatum then that it is not phonetics and/or it is significant is not true. sent5: if the copyreader is circulatory and does not swelter Nepal then the ecliptic does not swelter Nepal. sent6: if something that is circulatory trusses protege it is non-negligent. sent7: the horsebox is annalistic thing that does swelter Nepal. sent8: if something that is phonetics is ectopic then it is not a Sylviidae. sent9: the fact that the Aramean is not a Gerbert but a denotatum is false if the head is hormonal. sent10: the goal tastes recusation. sent11: there exists something such that if it trusses protege then it is negligent and it is a moiety. sent12: there exists something such that if it does truss protege then it is not negligent. sent13: if something is not a chalaza it is a moiety. sent14: the copyreader is philanthropic. sent15: if something does not swelter Nepal it is a kind of a moiety. sent16: the copyreader is circulatory. sent17: if there exists something such that it is both equal and not cardiopulmonary then the head is hormonal. sent18: the copyreader is circulatory thing that does not swelter Nepal if the father does not truss protege. sent19: if the fact that the Aramean is both not a Gerbert and a denotatum does not hold then that the crupper is not a denotatum hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copyreader trusses protege.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the copyreader is circulatory thing that does truss protege.; sent6 -> int2: the copyreader is not negligent if it is circulatory and it trusses protege.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the copyreader is not negligent.; sent15 -> int4: if the copyreader does not swelter Nepal then it is a moiety.; sent13 -> int5: the copyreader is a moiety if it is not a chalaza.;
the ecliptic does not swelter Nepal.
sent2 -> int6: the crupper is not philanthropic if that it is either not phonetics or significant or both is false.; sent4 -> int7: if the crupper is not a denotatum the fact that it is not phonetics and/or is significant does not hold.; sent10 -> int8: there exists something such that it tastes recusation.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the Mandaean does equal and is not cardiopulmonary.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it does equal and is not cardiopulmonary.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the head is not non-hormonal.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: that the Aramean is not a Gerbert and is a denotatum is not true.; sent19 & int12 -> int13: the crupper is not a denotatum.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the fact that the crupper is not phonetics or significant or both is not right is not incorrect.; int6 & int14 -> int15: the crupper is not philanthropic.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is not philanthropic.; int16 & sent3 -> int17: the fact that the father is a chalaza and is a moiety is not incorrect.; int17 -> int18: the father is a kind of a moiety.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it trusses protege it is not negligent and is a moiety. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does taste recusation then the Mandaean is equal and not cardiopulmonary. sent2: something is not philanthropic if that either it is not phonetics or it is not insignificant or both is wrong. sent3: the father is a chalaza and it is a moiety if there exists something such that it is not philanthropic. sent4: if something is not a kind of a denotatum then that it is not phonetics and/or it is significant is not true. sent5: if the copyreader is circulatory and does not swelter Nepal then the ecliptic does not swelter Nepal. sent6: if something that is circulatory trusses protege it is non-negligent. sent7: the horsebox is annalistic thing that does swelter Nepal. sent8: if something that is phonetics is ectopic then it is not a Sylviidae. sent9: the fact that the Aramean is not a Gerbert but a denotatum is false if the head is hormonal. sent10: the goal tastes recusation. sent11: there exists something such that if it trusses protege then it is negligent and it is a moiety. sent12: there exists something such that if it does truss protege then it is not negligent. sent13: if something is not a chalaza it is a moiety. sent14: the copyreader is philanthropic. sent15: if something does not swelter Nepal it is a kind of a moiety. sent16: the copyreader is circulatory. sent17: if there exists something such that it is both equal and not cardiopulmonary then the head is hormonal. sent18: the copyreader is circulatory thing that does not swelter Nepal if the father does not truss protege. sent19: if the fact that the Aramean is both not a Gerbert and a denotatum does not hold then that the crupper is not a denotatum hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the copyreader trusses protege.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the copyreader is circulatory thing that does truss protege.; sent6 -> int2: the copyreader is not negligent if it is circulatory and it trusses protege.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the copyreader is not negligent.; sent15 -> int4: if the copyreader does not swelter Nepal then it is a moiety.; sent13 -> int5: the copyreader is a moiety if it is not a chalaza.; __UNKNOWN__