the fact that there is something such that it is not a kind of a pion does not hold.
sent1: the Chinook is a scorching. sent2: there is something such that it scents cymule. sent3: if something is not a pion then the fact that it is not a Orectolobidae and/or it is a weightlifter is false. sent4: the utilizer does not scent outstation. sent5: the Britisher does not scent outstation. sent6: the zygote scents outstation if the Britisher is a pion. sent7: the fact that the Chinook is a pion if a sloucher does service Lodz hold. sent8: if the Chinook services Lodz then the fact that the utilizer services Lodz is not incorrect. sent9: if the fact that either something is not a kind of a sloucher or it does scent outstation or both does not hold it does not service Lodz. sent10: the Chinook services Lodz if something is a scorching and is a kind of a rivet. sent11: that either the utilizer is not a pion or it services Lodz or both is incorrect if the Britisher services Lodz. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a swagman is not incorrect. sent13: if that the zygote does service Lodz or is a sloucher or both is wrong then the fact that it does not scent outstation hold. sent14: the Britisher is a sloucher. sent15: there exists something such that it is a scorching that is a rivet. sent16: the fact that the friction does not scent outstation or is premedical or both is wrong. sent17: the fact that something does scent outstation but it is not a kind of a sloucher does not hold if the fact that it does service Lodz is not false. sent18: something does not compel conchologist. sent19: if something that does service Lodz scents outstation then the zygote is a kind of a sloucher. sent20: the Chinook is a kind of a pion. sent21: there are impermeable things. sent22: the utilizer is a pion if the Britisher is a sloucher. sent23: that the utilizer is not a kind of a sloucher and/or it scents outstation is wrong if the zygote does scents outstation. sent24: if the utilizer scents outstation the fact that the zygote is not a kind of a sloucher and/or it does scents outstation is wrong. sent25: the Chinook does not scent outstation. sent26: there exists something such that it services homonym and it is a sprigged.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Britisher is a kind of a pion.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the zygote does scent outstation.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the fact that the utilizer is not a kind of a sloucher and/or it scents outstation is false.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the utilizer is not a sloucher or it does scent outstation or both is not right then it does not service Lodz.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the utilizer does not service Lodz.; sent15 & sent10 -> int5: the Chinook does service Lodz.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the utilizer services Lodz.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Britisher is not a pion.; int8 -> hypothesis;
that either the zygote is not a kind of a Orectolobidae or it is a weightlifter or both does not hold.
sent3 -> int9: that the zygote is either not a Orectolobidae or a weightlifter or both is incorrect if it is not a pion.; sent17 -> int10: if the Britisher does service Lodz that it scents outstation and it is not a kind of a sloucher does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is not a kind of a pion does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Chinook is a scorching. sent2: there is something such that it scents cymule. sent3: if something is not a pion then the fact that it is not a Orectolobidae and/or it is a weightlifter is false. sent4: the utilizer does not scent outstation. sent5: the Britisher does not scent outstation. sent6: the zygote scents outstation if the Britisher is a pion. sent7: the fact that the Chinook is a pion if a sloucher does service Lodz hold. sent8: if the Chinook services Lodz then the fact that the utilizer services Lodz is not incorrect. sent9: if the fact that either something is not a kind of a sloucher or it does scent outstation or both does not hold it does not service Lodz. sent10: the Chinook services Lodz if something is a scorching and is a kind of a rivet. sent11: that either the utilizer is not a pion or it services Lodz or both is incorrect if the Britisher services Lodz. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a swagman is not incorrect. sent13: if that the zygote does service Lodz or is a sloucher or both is wrong then the fact that it does not scent outstation hold. sent14: the Britisher is a sloucher. sent15: there exists something such that it is a scorching that is a rivet. sent16: the fact that the friction does not scent outstation or is premedical or both is wrong. sent17: the fact that something does scent outstation but it is not a kind of a sloucher does not hold if the fact that it does service Lodz is not false. sent18: something does not compel conchologist. sent19: if something that does service Lodz scents outstation then the zygote is a kind of a sloucher. sent20: the Chinook is a kind of a pion. sent21: there are impermeable things. sent22: the utilizer is a pion if the Britisher is a sloucher. sent23: that the utilizer is not a kind of a sloucher and/or it scents outstation is wrong if the zygote does scents outstation. sent24: if the utilizer scents outstation the fact that the zygote is not a kind of a sloucher and/or it does scents outstation is wrong. sent25: the Chinook does not scent outstation. sent26: there exists something such that it services homonym and it is a sprigged. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Britisher is a kind of a pion.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the zygote does scent outstation.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the fact that the utilizer is not a kind of a sloucher and/or it scents outstation is false.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the utilizer is not a sloucher or it does scent outstation or both is not right then it does not service Lodz.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the utilizer does not service Lodz.; sent15 & sent10 -> int5: the Chinook does service Lodz.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the utilizer services Lodz.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Britisher is not a pion.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__