the glass is a Reduviidae.
sent1: if the fact that the microorganism is a duodenum and/or it does not slenderize is incorrect the methapyrilene indexes windage. sent2: that the Garrison is not a sinus but it does culture negation is not correct. sent3: that something is a Reduviidae is right if it is not a kind of a plain and is a transmittance. sent4: if that the Garrison either does not culture negation or is a Reduviidae or both is not right that the glass is not a kind of a Reduviidae is not false. sent5: if something is a plain and is a transmittance it is a Reduviidae. sent6: if something is a kind of a disgruntlement then the fact that it is not ecological is true. sent7: the microorganism does not color Strasbourg. sent8: if something is not a transmittance then the fact that it is both an attainder and a plain does not hold. sent9: if that something is an attainder and is a kind of a plain does not hold then it is not ecological. sent10: if that something is not a kind of a slaughter is not false it is not a Reduviidae. sent11: if the Garrison is not an attainder the glass is non-plain a transmittance. sent12: the fact that the Garrison is a sinus but it does not culture negation does not hold. sent13: the fact that the microorganism is a duodenum and/or it does not slenderize is not right if that it does not color Strasbourg hold. sent14: The fact that the negation cultures Garrison is not incorrect. sent15: if that something is not a sinus and it does not culture negation is not correct it is a disgruntlement. sent16: the glass is not plain. sent17: the Garrison is a sinus and is a disgruntlement if the void is not ecological. sent18: if the Garrison is not an attainder then the glass is not a plain. sent19: the fact that the Garrison cultures negation is not incorrect. sent20: that the void is a kind of a transmittance does not hold if the methapyrilene indexes windage and it is a cryometer. sent21: if something is not ecological then that it is not a kind of an attainder is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Garrison is not a sinus and it does not culture negation.; assump1 -> int1: the Garrison does not culture negation.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Garrison is not a sinus and it does not culture negation is incorrect.; sent15 -> int4: if that the Garrison is not a sinus and it does not culture negation is false then it is a disgruntlement.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Garrison is a kind of a disgruntlement.; sent6 -> int6: the Garrison is not ecological if it is a disgruntlement.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Garrison is not ecological.; sent21 -> int8: the fact that the Garrison is not an attainder hold if it is not ecological.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Garrison is not an attainder.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the glass is not a plain but it is a transmittance.; sent3 -> int11: if the glass is not a plain but it is a transmittance it is a Reduviidae.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the glass is not a Reduviidae.
sent9 -> int12: that the void is not ecological is correct if that it is a kind of an attainder and it is plain is false.; sent8 -> int13: the fact that the void is an attainder and is a kind of a plain is not true if that it is not a transmittance is true.; sent13 & sent7 -> int14: the fact that the microorganism is a duodenum and/or it does not slenderize does not hold.; sent1 & int14 -> int15: the methapyrilene does index windage.;
$hypothesis$ = the glass is a Reduviidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the microorganism is a duodenum and/or it does not slenderize is incorrect the methapyrilene indexes windage. sent2: that the Garrison is not a sinus but it does culture negation is not correct. sent3: that something is a Reduviidae is right if it is not a kind of a plain and is a transmittance. sent4: if that the Garrison either does not culture negation or is a Reduviidae or both is not right that the glass is not a kind of a Reduviidae is not false. sent5: if something is a plain and is a transmittance it is a Reduviidae. sent6: if something is a kind of a disgruntlement then the fact that it is not ecological is true. sent7: the microorganism does not color Strasbourg. sent8: if something is not a transmittance then the fact that it is both an attainder and a plain does not hold. sent9: if that something is an attainder and is a kind of a plain does not hold then it is not ecological. sent10: if that something is not a kind of a slaughter is not false it is not a Reduviidae. sent11: if the Garrison is not an attainder the glass is non-plain a transmittance. sent12: the fact that the Garrison is a sinus but it does not culture negation does not hold. sent13: the fact that the microorganism is a duodenum and/or it does not slenderize is not right if that it does not color Strasbourg hold. sent14: The fact that the negation cultures Garrison is not incorrect. sent15: if that something is not a sinus and it does not culture negation is not correct it is a disgruntlement. sent16: the glass is not plain. sent17: the Garrison is a sinus and is a disgruntlement if the void is not ecological. sent18: if the Garrison is not an attainder then the glass is not a plain. sent19: the fact that the Garrison cultures negation is not incorrect. sent20: that the void is a kind of a transmittance does not hold if the methapyrilene indexes windage and it is a cryometer. sent21: if something is not ecological then that it is not a kind of an attainder is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Garrison is not a sinus and it does not culture negation.; assump1 -> int1: the Garrison does not culture negation.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Garrison is not a sinus and it does not culture negation is incorrect.; sent15 -> int4: if that the Garrison is not a sinus and it does not culture negation is false then it is a disgruntlement.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Garrison is a kind of a disgruntlement.; sent6 -> int6: the Garrison is not ecological if it is a disgruntlement.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Garrison is not ecological.; sent21 -> int8: the fact that the Garrison is not an attainder hold if it is not ecological.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Garrison is not an attainder.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the glass is not a plain but it is a transmittance.; sent3 -> int11: if the glass is not a plain but it is a transmittance it is a Reduviidae.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__