that the boarding but not the bethinking aeration happens is not correct.
sent1: the fact that that the boarding occurs but the bethinking aeration does not occur is true is not correct if the minimalness does not occur. sent2: that the damaging feebleness and the minimalness happens prevents that the paramagneticness occurs. sent3: if the damaging feebleness does not occur the fact that the fact that the jerking but not the overrunning obtuseness occurs is not false does not hold. sent4: the capitalizing chili does not occur. sent5: both the aerobicness and the paramagneticness happens if the capitalizing chili does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the minimalness occurs.; sent5 & sent4 -> int1: both the aerobicness and the paramagneticness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the paramagneticness occurs.;
the fact that the jerking occurs but the overrunning obtuseness does not occur does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the boarding but not the bethinking aeration happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the boarding occurs but the bethinking aeration does not occur is true is not correct if the minimalness does not occur. sent2: that the damaging feebleness and the minimalness happens prevents that the paramagneticness occurs. sent3: if the damaging feebleness does not occur the fact that the fact that the jerking but not the overrunning obtuseness occurs is not false does not hold. sent4: the capitalizing chili does not occur. sent5: both the aerobicness and the paramagneticness happens if the capitalizing chili does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the minimalness occurs.; sent5 & sent4 -> int1: both the aerobicness and the paramagneticness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the paramagneticness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__