the positioning but not the retrofitting happens if that the viscometry does not occur is true.
sent1: that the monetization does not occur and the clocking suicide occurs prevents the retrieval. sent2: the viscometry is triggered by the salving thriftlessness. sent3: that the revealing cushion does not occur is true if the fact that that the clocking designing occurs is not incorrect is not right. sent4: if the fact that the viscometry does not occur and the retrieval happens is wrong then the spray does not occur. sent5: the water does not occur if the stew does not occur. sent6: the revealing cushion does not occur if the charlatanism happens. sent7: the clocking Columbus occurs if the sloth occurs. sent8: if the viscometry does not occur then the positioning occurs. sent9: that the non-tubalness and the clocking zizz happens prevents the lutealness. sent10: the monetization does not occur. sent11: that the revealing cushion does not occur causes that the monetization does not occur but the clocking suicide happens. sent12: if the retrieval does not occur and the salving thriftlessness does not occur the contraction does not occur. sent13: the charlatanism occurs and/or the clocking designing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the salving thriftlessness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the viscometry happens is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the viscometry does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the salving thriftlessness does not occur hold.; sent13 & sent6 & sent3 -> int4: that the revealing cushion does not occur hold.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: not the monetization but the clocking suicide happens.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the retrieval does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the retrieval does not occur and the salving thriftlessness does not occur is not false.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the contraction does not occur.;
not the spray but the Transfiguration happens.
$hypothesis$ = the positioning but not the retrofitting happens if that the viscometry does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the monetization does not occur and the clocking suicide occurs prevents the retrieval. sent2: the viscometry is triggered by the salving thriftlessness. sent3: that the revealing cushion does not occur is true if the fact that that the clocking designing occurs is not incorrect is not right. sent4: if the fact that the viscometry does not occur and the retrieval happens is wrong then the spray does not occur. sent5: the water does not occur if the stew does not occur. sent6: the revealing cushion does not occur if the charlatanism happens. sent7: the clocking Columbus occurs if the sloth occurs. sent8: if the viscometry does not occur then the positioning occurs. sent9: that the non-tubalness and the clocking zizz happens prevents the lutealness. sent10: the monetization does not occur. sent11: that the revealing cushion does not occur causes that the monetization does not occur but the clocking suicide happens. sent12: if the retrieval does not occur and the salving thriftlessness does not occur the contraction does not occur. sent13: the charlatanism occurs and/or the clocking designing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the salving thriftlessness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the viscometry happens is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the viscometry does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the salving thriftlessness does not occur hold.; sent13 & sent6 & sent3 -> int4: that the revealing cushion does not occur hold.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: not the monetization but the clocking suicide happens.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the retrieval does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the retrieval does not occur and the salving thriftlessness does not occur is not false.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the contraction does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__