that if the churning cert does not occur then the fact that the drippings does not occur and the cursing happens is false does not hold.
sent1: that the population and the ring-around-the-rosy occurs is not correct if the hug does not occur. sent2: if the accompaniment occurs the housing does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the rapping estuary does not occur and the crossfire does not occur does not hold the fact that the churning phloem occurs is not false. sent4: if the fact that the alkahesticness does not occur and the ridicule does not occur is not true then the timing occurs. sent5: the fact that the rapping Helipterum happens and the khamsin does not occur does not hold. sent6: the fact that not the rapping estuary but the crossfire happens is false. sent7: that the churning cert does not occur results in that not the drippings but the cursing happens. sent8: if the housing does not occur then the fact that the drippings does not occur but the cursing occurs is not right. sent9: if the crossfire happens then the churning phloem occurs. sent10: the fact that the churning theorization happens and the anecdotalness happens is not true. sent11: that both the drippings and the cursing happens is not right if the housing does not occur. sent12: if the churning cert occurs then the fact that the drippings does not occur and the curse occurs is not true. sent13: that the slugging does not occur is not false if the fact that the anecdotalness happens is correct. sent14: the fact that the churning theorization occurs and the anecdotalness occurs is false if the churning cert does not occur. sent15: that the drippings does not occur but the cursing happens is brought about by that the house does not occur. sent16: the fact that the churning theorization and the non-anecdotalness occurs does not hold if the churning cert does not occur. sent17: if the slugging does not occur the fact that the fact that the rapping estuary does not occur and the crossfire does not occur is wrong is correct. sent18: the fact that the rapping estuary does not occur and the crossfire happens does not hold if the slugging does not occur. sent19: the slugging does not occur if that the churning theorization occurs but the anecdotalness does not occur does not hold. sent20: the housing is prevented by either the churning phloem or the accompaniment or both. sent21: the fact that the drippings occurs and the cursing occurs is false. sent22: if the cubitalness does not occur the fact that the rapping Helipterum and the foulness occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the churning cert does not occur.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that the churning theorization happens but the anecdotalness does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the slug does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the rapping estuary does not occur and the crossfire does not occur is incorrect.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the churning phloem occurs.; int4 -> int5: the churning phloem happens and/or the accompaniment happens.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the house does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the drippings does not occur but the curse occurs is false.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the churning cert does not occur then the fact that the drippings does not occur and the cursing happens is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the population and the ring-around-the-rosy occurs is not correct if the hug does not occur. sent2: if the accompaniment occurs the housing does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the rapping estuary does not occur and the crossfire does not occur does not hold the fact that the churning phloem occurs is not false. sent4: if the fact that the alkahesticness does not occur and the ridicule does not occur is not true then the timing occurs. sent5: the fact that the rapping Helipterum happens and the khamsin does not occur does not hold. sent6: the fact that not the rapping estuary but the crossfire happens is false. sent7: that the churning cert does not occur results in that not the drippings but the cursing happens. sent8: if the housing does not occur then the fact that the drippings does not occur but the cursing occurs is not right. sent9: if the crossfire happens then the churning phloem occurs. sent10: the fact that the churning theorization happens and the anecdotalness happens is not true. sent11: that both the drippings and the cursing happens is not right if the housing does not occur. sent12: if the churning cert occurs then the fact that the drippings does not occur and the curse occurs is not true. sent13: that the slugging does not occur is not false if the fact that the anecdotalness happens is correct. sent14: the fact that the churning theorization occurs and the anecdotalness occurs is false if the churning cert does not occur. sent15: that the drippings does not occur but the cursing happens is brought about by that the house does not occur. sent16: the fact that the churning theorization and the non-anecdotalness occurs does not hold if the churning cert does not occur. sent17: if the slugging does not occur the fact that the fact that the rapping estuary does not occur and the crossfire does not occur is wrong is correct. sent18: the fact that the rapping estuary does not occur and the crossfire happens does not hold if the slugging does not occur. sent19: the slugging does not occur if that the churning theorization occurs but the anecdotalness does not occur does not hold. sent20: the housing is prevented by either the churning phloem or the accompaniment or both. sent21: the fact that the drippings occurs and the cursing occurs is false. sent22: if the cubitalness does not occur the fact that the rapping Helipterum and the foulness occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the churning cert does not occur.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: that the churning theorization happens but the anecdotalness does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the slug does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the rapping estuary does not occur and the crossfire does not occur is incorrect.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the churning phloem occurs.; int4 -> int5: the churning phloem happens and/or the accompaniment happens.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the house does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the drippings does not occur but the curse occurs is false.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__