the MSG is a hairball.
sent1: the MSG is not a hairball if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a hairball that jostles Mondrian does not hold. sent2: something does jostle Mondrian. sent3: that the hyaloplasm does kidnap brisket but it does not revamp is not correct. sent4: that something does not revamp and it does not individuate MSG is not correct if the fact that it does not kidnap hyaloplasm is not wrong. sent5: the laborer is a specific. sent6: if the laborer does individuate MSG and does kidnap hyaloplasm the stipule does not trumpet. sent7: the fact that the hyaloplasm does not kidnap brisket and does revamp is not true. sent8: the fact that the hyaloplasm is a hairball that jostles Mondrian is not right if there exists something such that it does not kidnap brisket. sent9: there is something such that that it does not kidnap brisket and revamps is false. sent10: the fact that the laborer kidnaps hyaloplasm but it is not a kind of a Abruzzi is wrong. sent11: if that there is something such that it jostles Mondrian is not false then the fact that that the hyaloplasm does not kidnap brisket and does not revamp is incorrect is true. sent12: if the fact that the laborer does not kidnap hyaloplasm and it is not a kind of a Abruzzi is incorrect then the fact that it kidnap hyaloplasm is not wrong. sent13: the MSG is a Abruzzi. sent14: the brisket is lively and it does trumpet. sent15: the fact that the laborer does not kidnap hyaloplasm and it is not a Abruzzi is wrong. sent16: if the stipule does not trumpet the brisket is a kind of a percentage. sent17: if the brisket is a kind of a percentage the MSG is a kind of a hairball. sent18: if the fact that the stipule kidnaps hyaloplasm does not hold the laborer does trumpet. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not individuate MSG and it is not a kind of a percentage is not correct then the brisket is a hairball. sent20: the stipule is a kind of a hairball. sent21: that the hyaloplasm kidnaps brisket but it does not revamp is incorrect if there exists something such that it jostles Mondrian. sent22: if there exists something such that that it does not kidnap brisket and does not revamp does not hold the laborer individuates MSG.
sent2 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the hyaloplasm does not kidnap brisket and does not revamp is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does not kidnap brisket and it does not revamp is false.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the laborer does individuate MSG.; sent12 & sent15 -> int4: the laborer kidnaps hyaloplasm.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the laborer does individuate MSG and it does kidnap hyaloplasm.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the stipule does not trumpet.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the brisket is a kind of a percentage.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the MSG is not a hairball.
sent4 -> int8: the fact that the stipule does not revamp and does not individuate MSG is wrong if it does not kidnap hyaloplasm.;
$hypothesis$ = the MSG is a hairball. ; $context$ = sent1: the MSG is not a hairball if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a hairball that jostles Mondrian does not hold. sent2: something does jostle Mondrian. sent3: that the hyaloplasm does kidnap brisket but it does not revamp is not correct. sent4: that something does not revamp and it does not individuate MSG is not correct if the fact that it does not kidnap hyaloplasm is not wrong. sent5: the laborer is a specific. sent6: if the laborer does individuate MSG and does kidnap hyaloplasm the stipule does not trumpet. sent7: the fact that the hyaloplasm does not kidnap brisket and does revamp is not true. sent8: the fact that the hyaloplasm is a hairball that jostles Mondrian is not right if there exists something such that it does not kidnap brisket. sent9: there is something such that that it does not kidnap brisket and revamps is false. sent10: the fact that the laborer kidnaps hyaloplasm but it is not a kind of a Abruzzi is wrong. sent11: if that there is something such that it jostles Mondrian is not false then the fact that that the hyaloplasm does not kidnap brisket and does not revamp is incorrect is true. sent12: if the fact that the laborer does not kidnap hyaloplasm and it is not a kind of a Abruzzi is incorrect then the fact that it kidnap hyaloplasm is not wrong. sent13: the MSG is a Abruzzi. sent14: the brisket is lively and it does trumpet. sent15: the fact that the laborer does not kidnap hyaloplasm and it is not a Abruzzi is wrong. sent16: if the stipule does not trumpet the brisket is a kind of a percentage. sent17: if the brisket is a kind of a percentage the MSG is a kind of a hairball. sent18: if the fact that the stipule kidnaps hyaloplasm does not hold the laborer does trumpet. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not individuate MSG and it is not a kind of a percentage is not correct then the brisket is a hairball. sent20: the stipule is a kind of a hairball. sent21: that the hyaloplasm kidnaps brisket but it does not revamp is incorrect if there exists something such that it jostles Mondrian. sent22: if there exists something such that that it does not kidnap brisket and does not revamp does not hold the laborer individuates MSG. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the hyaloplasm does not kidnap brisket and does not revamp is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does not kidnap brisket and it does not revamp is false.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the laborer does individuate MSG.; sent12 & sent15 -> int4: the laborer kidnaps hyaloplasm.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the laborer does individuate MSG and it does kidnap hyaloplasm.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the stipule does not trumpet.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the brisket is a kind of a percentage.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__