the epaulet is hemic.
sent1: if something is both unwelcome and a ictodosaur then it is a Fructidor. sent2: the epaulet is not variolar if there exists something such that it does not mystify cardiology. sent3: the epaulet is a kind of non-variolar thing that is a weightlift if there is something such that it does not mystify cardiology. sent4: if something that is not variolar is a weightlift then it is hemic. sent5: there exists something such that it does not mystify cardiology. sent6: the epaulet is hemic if it is variolar and it is a weightlift. sent7: something is hemic if it is variolar and it is a weightlift.
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the epaulet is not variolar but it is a kind of a weightlift.; sent4 -> int2: if the epaulet is non-variolar thing that is a kind of a weightlift it is hemic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the epaulet is hemic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is both unwelcome and a ictodosaur then it is a Fructidor. sent2: the epaulet is not variolar if there exists something such that it does not mystify cardiology. sent3: the epaulet is a kind of non-variolar thing that is a weightlift if there is something such that it does not mystify cardiology. sent4: if something that is not variolar is a weightlift then it is hemic. sent5: there exists something such that it does not mystify cardiology. sent6: the epaulet is hemic if it is variolar and it is a weightlift. sent7: something is hemic if it is variolar and it is a weightlift. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the epaulet is not variolar but it is a kind of a weightlift.; sent4 -> int2: if the epaulet is non-variolar thing that is a kind of a weightlift it is hemic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__