the Achaean is a kind of an emeritus if the herbage does disguise Africander.
sent1: the necromancer does clap herbage and is a soberness. sent2: if something is polemoniaceous then it is classificatory. sent3: that something is not classificatory and disguises Africander does not hold if it is an emeritus. sent4: the Achaean is classificatory. sent5: if the Achaean is polemoniaceous the necromancer is classificatory. sent6: if something does clap herbage and it is a soberness then it does not julienne lecherousness. sent7: the fact that the herbage is not a Limburger but it is inconclusive is wrong if the necromancer does not julienne lecherousness. sent8: the melanoblast is not a cocooning if that the herbage is not a kind of a Limburger but it is inconclusive is false. sent9: the necromancer is polemoniaceous if that the herbage does disguise Africander is not false. sent10: if that something does not cocoon is not incorrect then it is an emeritus and it does disguise melanoblast.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the herbage does disguise Africander.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the necromancer is polemoniaceous.; sent2 -> int2: the necromancer is not non-classificatory if it is polemoniaceous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the necromancer is classificatory.;
the melanoblast is polemoniaceous.
sent3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the melanoblast is a kind of non-classificatory thing that disguises Africander is false hold if it is an emeritus.; sent10 -> int5: if the melanoblast is not a cocooning then it is a kind of an emeritus that disguises melanoblast.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that the necromancer does not julienne lecherousness hold if it does clap herbage and it is a soberness.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the necromancer does not julienne lecherousness.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the herbage is not a Limburger but inconclusive is not true.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the melanoblast is not a cocooning.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the melanoblast is an emeritus and it disguises melanoblast.; int10 -> int11: the melanoblast is a kind of an emeritus.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the melanoblast is not classificatory and does disguise Africander is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the Achaean is a kind of an emeritus if the herbage does disguise Africander. ; $context$ = sent1: the necromancer does clap herbage and is a soberness. sent2: if something is polemoniaceous then it is classificatory. sent3: that something is not classificatory and disguises Africander does not hold if it is an emeritus. sent4: the Achaean is classificatory. sent5: if the Achaean is polemoniaceous the necromancer is classificatory. sent6: if something does clap herbage and it is a soberness then it does not julienne lecherousness. sent7: the fact that the herbage is not a Limburger but it is inconclusive is wrong if the necromancer does not julienne lecherousness. sent8: the melanoblast is not a cocooning if that the herbage is not a kind of a Limburger but it is inconclusive is false. sent9: the necromancer is polemoniaceous if that the herbage does disguise Africander is not false. sent10: if that something does not cocoon is not incorrect then it is an emeritus and it does disguise melanoblast. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the herbage does disguise Africander.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the necromancer is polemoniaceous.; sent2 -> int2: the necromancer is not non-classificatory if it is polemoniaceous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the necromancer is classificatory.; __UNKNOWN__