the gyroscopicness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that both the reheating wardenship and the chondriticness happens is not correct. sent2: the swabbing occurs. sent3: the postbiblicalness and the insufflating TSA happens. sent4: if the fact that the Ephesian occurs and the homering does not occur does not hold the homering happens. sent5: that the auxeticness happens and the solution does not occur is not true. sent6: the fullness is prevented by that the auscultatoriness and the hieraticness happens. sent7: the drilling frieze happens. sent8: that the intumescing occurs is prevented by that both the commutation and the partial occurs. sent9: the chondriticness is prevented by that the gyroscopicness happens and the swab occurs. sent10: if the fact that the reheating wardenship occurs and the chondriticness does not occur is not true that the chondriticness occurs is not false. sent11: that the expiating and the perturbation happens prevents that the noshing happens. sent12: the sarcolemmalness occurs if the fact that the sulcateness happens and the sarcolemmalness does not occur is not true. sent13: that both the reheating wardenship and the non-chondriticness occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gyroscopicness happens.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: both the gyroscopicness and the swab occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the chondriticness does not occur is true.; sent10 & sent13 -> int3: the chondriticness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the gyroscopicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the reheating wardenship and the chondriticness happens is not correct. sent2: the swabbing occurs. sent3: the postbiblicalness and the insufflating TSA happens. sent4: if the fact that the Ephesian occurs and the homering does not occur does not hold the homering happens. sent5: that the auxeticness happens and the solution does not occur is not true. sent6: the fullness is prevented by that the auscultatoriness and the hieraticness happens. sent7: the drilling frieze happens. sent8: that the intumescing occurs is prevented by that both the commutation and the partial occurs. sent9: the chondriticness is prevented by that the gyroscopicness happens and the swab occurs. sent10: if the fact that the reheating wardenship occurs and the chondriticness does not occur is not true that the chondriticness occurs is not false. sent11: that the expiating and the perturbation happens prevents that the noshing happens. sent12: the sarcolemmalness occurs if the fact that the sulcateness happens and the sarcolemmalness does not occur is not true. sent13: that both the reheating wardenship and the non-chondriticness occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gyroscopicness happens.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: both the gyroscopicness and the swab occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the chondriticness does not occur is true.; sent10 & sent13 -> int3: the chondriticness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__