the fact that the Mead does not citify is not incorrect.
sent1: the tortoise is a kind of an analyzer. sent2: the pushover is not utopian but it is a streak. sent3: if the bosom is a kind of a gomphothere then the precipitate does reckon precipitate. sent4: the haymaker is not a kind of a gomphothere if it does not second. sent5: if the pinfold is not Proustian then it does not reckon precipitate. sent6: the Mead does not citify if the angelfish does not clout. sent7: if the pushover is a kind of a manganate then the tortoise is a gomphothere. sent8: the fact that the precipitate is not a kind of a gomphothere is correct if the pushover is not a gomphothere but interfacial. sent9: the pushover does not citify. sent10: that that the pinfold is non-Proustian thing that does run is true is incorrect if the tortoise is a manganate. sent11: that the tortoise is a kind of a gomphothere is not false. sent12: something is a kind of Proustian an analyzer if that it is a manganate is false. sent13: if the fact that the pinfold is not Proustian but it does run is false then the precipitate is a gomphothere. sent14: the bosom does not reckon precipitate if the pushover is a kind of a run that is a gomphothere. sent15: the haymaker seconds. sent16: the fact that the taguan is not a run is correct if that it does reckon precipitate and is a run is not right. sent17: the pinfold is not Proustian if the bosom is a kind of non-Proustian thing that reckons Joffrey. sent18: if the bosom is an analyzer then that the tortoise is a manganate hold. sent19: the fact that something is not a kind of a gomphothere but it is a manganate is wrong if it is not a run. sent20: the angelfish does not clout if the bosom does not reckon Joffrey but it reckons precipitate. sent21: the pushover is not a gomphothere but it is interfacial if something is a second. sent22: if that the bosom is not an analyzer is not wrong then it does not reckon Joffrey and it does reckon precipitate. sent23: the precipitate does not reckon precipitate. sent24: if the pinfold is both not Proustian and an analyzer the bosom is not Proustian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bosom is an analyzer.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the tortoise is a kind of a manganate.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the pinfold is not Proustian but it does run does not hold.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the precipitate is a gomphothere.; sent15 -> int4: something is a second.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the pushover is both not a gomphothere and interfacial.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the precipitate is not a kind of a gomphothere is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the bosom is not an analyzer hold.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the bosom does not reckon Joffrey but it reckons precipitate.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the angelfish does not clout.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the taguan is not non-Proustian.
sent12 -> int11: that the taguan is Proustian and it is an analyzer is true if it is not a manganate.; sent19 -> int12: the fact that the taguan is not a gomphothere but it is a manganate is not true if it does not run.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Mead does not citify is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the tortoise is a kind of an analyzer. sent2: the pushover is not utopian but it is a streak. sent3: if the bosom is a kind of a gomphothere then the precipitate does reckon precipitate. sent4: the haymaker is not a kind of a gomphothere if it does not second. sent5: if the pinfold is not Proustian then it does not reckon precipitate. sent6: the Mead does not citify if the angelfish does not clout. sent7: if the pushover is a kind of a manganate then the tortoise is a gomphothere. sent8: the fact that the precipitate is not a kind of a gomphothere is correct if the pushover is not a gomphothere but interfacial. sent9: the pushover does not citify. sent10: that that the pinfold is non-Proustian thing that does run is true is incorrect if the tortoise is a manganate. sent11: that the tortoise is a kind of a gomphothere is not false. sent12: something is a kind of Proustian an analyzer if that it is a manganate is false. sent13: if the fact that the pinfold is not Proustian but it does run is false then the precipitate is a gomphothere. sent14: the bosom does not reckon precipitate if the pushover is a kind of a run that is a gomphothere. sent15: the haymaker seconds. sent16: the fact that the taguan is not a run is correct if that it does reckon precipitate and is a run is not right. sent17: the pinfold is not Proustian if the bosom is a kind of non-Proustian thing that reckons Joffrey. sent18: if the bosom is an analyzer then that the tortoise is a manganate hold. sent19: the fact that something is not a kind of a gomphothere but it is a manganate is wrong if it is not a run. sent20: the angelfish does not clout if the bosom does not reckon Joffrey but it reckons precipitate. sent21: the pushover is not a gomphothere but it is interfacial if something is a second. sent22: if that the bosom is not an analyzer is not wrong then it does not reckon Joffrey and it does reckon precipitate. sent23: the precipitate does not reckon precipitate. sent24: if the pinfold is both not Proustian and an analyzer the bosom is not Proustian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bosom is an analyzer.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the tortoise is a kind of a manganate.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the pinfold is not Proustian but it does run does not hold.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the precipitate is a gomphothere.; sent15 -> int4: something is a second.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the pushover is both not a gomphothere and interfacial.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the precipitate is not a kind of a gomphothere is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the bosom is not an analyzer hold.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the bosom does not reckon Joffrey but it reckons precipitate.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the angelfish does not clout.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__