the plier is not a kind of a lowering and it does not pin determination.
sent1: if the fact that the langlaufer is not a requirement and is not an audition is wrong then it pins determination. sent2: the surface is pyroligneous. sent3: the surface pins dugout and is appellative. sent4: the fact that the langlaufer is both not a requirement and not an audition is not correct if it is not considerate. sent5: if the langlaufer does pin determination the plier is not a lowering and it does not pin determination. sent6: if a tasteful thing does pin dugout then the langlaufer is not considerate. sent7: something that is tasteless and/or is not nonlexical is tasteful. sent8: if the surface is pyroligneous then it either is tasteless or is not nonlexical or both.
sent7 -> int1: that the surface is not non-tasteful is not incorrect if it is tasteless and/or is not nonlexical.; sent8 & sent2 -> int2: either the surface is tasteless or it is not nonlexical or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the surface is tasteful.; sent3 -> int4: the surface does pin dugout.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the surface is tasteful and pins dugout.; int5 -> int6: something is not non-tasteful and it pins dugout.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the langlaufer is not considerate.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the langlaufer is not a kind of a requirement and it is not an audition is correct is wrong.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the langlaufer does pin determination.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the plier is not a kind of a lowering and it does not pin determination. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the langlaufer is not a requirement and is not an audition is wrong then it pins determination. sent2: the surface is pyroligneous. sent3: the surface pins dugout and is appellative. sent4: the fact that the langlaufer is both not a requirement and not an audition is not correct if it is not considerate. sent5: if the langlaufer does pin determination the plier is not a lowering and it does not pin determination. sent6: if a tasteful thing does pin dugout then the langlaufer is not considerate. sent7: something that is tasteless and/or is not nonlexical is tasteful. sent8: if the surface is pyroligneous then it either is tasteless or is not nonlexical or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the surface is not non-tasteful is not incorrect if it is tasteless and/or is not nonlexical.; sent8 & sent2 -> int2: either the surface is tasteless or it is not nonlexical or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the surface is tasteful.; sent3 -> int4: the surface does pin dugout.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the surface is tasteful and pins dugout.; int5 -> int6: something is not non-tasteful and it pins dugout.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the langlaufer is not considerate.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the langlaufer is not a kind of a requirement and it is not an audition is correct is wrong.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the langlaufer does pin determination.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__