the pedometer is cross-linguistic.
sent1: the Capitol is apocrine. sent2: if the organophosphate crows cuppa then the Capitol is a kind of a masking. sent3: if the organophosphate is a receptionist then it crows cuppa. sent4: the Capitol is not cenogenetic if it is both a masking and apocrine. sent5: the fact that the pedometer is both not Homeric and an indebtedness is not true if the Capitol is not cenogenetic. sent6: that the organophosphate does not reseat and does restore is not true. sent7: if the fact that something is not Homeric but it is a kind of an indebtedness does not hold then it is non-cross-linguistic. sent8: that the organophosphate is a receptionist hold if the fact that it does not reseat and it restores is incorrect.
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the organophosphate is a receptionist.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the organophosphate does crow cuppa.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Capitol is a masking.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the Capitol is a masking and it is apocrine.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the Capitol is non-cenogenetic.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the pedometer is non-Homeric an indebtedness is false.; sent7 -> int7: the pedometer is not cross-linguistic if that it is not Homeric but an indebtedness is not true.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pedometer is cross-linguistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the Capitol is apocrine. sent2: if the organophosphate crows cuppa then the Capitol is a kind of a masking. sent3: if the organophosphate is a receptionist then it crows cuppa. sent4: the Capitol is not cenogenetic if it is both a masking and apocrine. sent5: the fact that the pedometer is both not Homeric and an indebtedness is not true if the Capitol is not cenogenetic. sent6: that the organophosphate does not reseat and does restore is not true. sent7: if the fact that something is not Homeric but it is a kind of an indebtedness does not hold then it is non-cross-linguistic. sent8: that the organophosphate is a receptionist hold if the fact that it does not reseat and it restores is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the organophosphate is a receptionist.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the organophosphate does crow cuppa.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Capitol is a masking.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the Capitol is a masking and it is apocrine.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the Capitol is non-cenogenetic.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the pedometer is non-Homeric an indebtedness is false.; sent7 -> int7: the pedometer is not cross-linguistic if that it is not Homeric but an indebtedness is not true.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__