the tobogganist grates squad.
sent1: the obturator does undercut obturator. sent2: that the strongman is a hypercatalectic is right. sent3: the mastic is hypercatalectic if the participant induces habited. sent4: the kingsnake grates squad. sent5: if that the tobogganist grates squad and/or it does not induce habited does not hold the carabao is not hypercatalectic. sent6: if the obturator does not grate Sylviidae that it is not a radiogram and not a used is not true. sent7: the fact that the obturator does grate squad is not incorrect. sent8: if the tobogganist is not inalienable that it is a hypercatalectic hold. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hypercatalectic and does induce catapult is false. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it does not induce catapult and it does not grate Sylviidae is wrong the tobogganist is a used. sent11: if the tobogganist is alienable then it is a radiogram. sent12: the obturator is not a radiogram. sent13: the fact that the obturator does not grate Sylviidae and it is not a used is false. sent14: that the obturator is not a skilled and does induce lunacy is not right if it does not grate Sylviidae. sent15: the tobogganist is alienable if it is a used. sent16: the tobogganist grates squad if the fact that it does induce habited is right. sent17: there is something such that that the fact that it is not an integrity and/or is not benign is true does not hold. sent18: that the obturator does not induce catapult but it grates Sylviidae is false. sent19: if the participant is a billed then it does induce habited. sent20: if the obturator does induce habited it does induce catapult. sent21: something does not use and/or it is alienable if it is a kind of a hypercatalectic. sent22: the tobogganist is a radiogram if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a used and does not grate squad is not correct. sent23: if something is not a radiogram and uses then it is alienable. sent24: that something does not induce catapult and does not grate Sylviidae is wrong if it is not a kind of a radiogram. sent25: the tobogganist induces habited if it is a hypercatalectic. sent26: if the obturator is hypercatalectic then it is a kind of a radiogram. sent27: if the flagellant induces habited it does witness.
sent24 -> int1: if the fact that the obturator is not a radiogram hold that it does not induce catapult and does not grate Sylviidae is incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the obturator does not induce catapult and it does not grate Sylviidae is wrong.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that that it does not induce catapult and it does not grate Sylviidae hold is wrong.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the tobogganist is a used.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the tobogganist is alienable.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the tobogganist is hypercatalectic.; int6 & sent25 -> int7: that the tobogganist does induce habited hold.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the tobogganist does not grate squad.
sent21 -> int8: the mastic is not a kind of a used or it is alienable or both if it is a kind of a hypercatalectic.;
$hypothesis$ = the tobogganist grates squad. ; $context$ = sent1: the obturator does undercut obturator. sent2: that the strongman is a hypercatalectic is right. sent3: the mastic is hypercatalectic if the participant induces habited. sent4: the kingsnake grates squad. sent5: if that the tobogganist grates squad and/or it does not induce habited does not hold the carabao is not hypercatalectic. sent6: if the obturator does not grate Sylviidae that it is not a radiogram and not a used is not true. sent7: the fact that the obturator does grate squad is not incorrect. sent8: if the tobogganist is not inalienable that it is a hypercatalectic hold. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hypercatalectic and does induce catapult is false. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it does not induce catapult and it does not grate Sylviidae is wrong the tobogganist is a used. sent11: if the tobogganist is alienable then it is a radiogram. sent12: the obturator is not a radiogram. sent13: the fact that the obturator does not grate Sylviidae and it is not a used is false. sent14: that the obturator is not a skilled and does induce lunacy is not right if it does not grate Sylviidae. sent15: the tobogganist is alienable if it is a used. sent16: the tobogganist grates squad if the fact that it does induce habited is right. sent17: there is something such that that the fact that it is not an integrity and/or is not benign is true does not hold. sent18: that the obturator does not induce catapult but it grates Sylviidae is false. sent19: if the participant is a billed then it does induce habited. sent20: if the obturator does induce habited it does induce catapult. sent21: something does not use and/or it is alienable if it is a kind of a hypercatalectic. sent22: the tobogganist is a radiogram if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a used and does not grate squad is not correct. sent23: if something is not a radiogram and uses then it is alienable. sent24: that something does not induce catapult and does not grate Sylviidae is wrong if it is not a kind of a radiogram. sent25: the tobogganist induces habited if it is a hypercatalectic. sent26: if the obturator is hypercatalectic then it is a kind of a radiogram. sent27: if the flagellant induces habited it does witness. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 -> int1: if the fact that the obturator is not a radiogram hold that it does not induce catapult and does not grate Sylviidae is incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the obturator does not induce catapult and it does not grate Sylviidae is wrong.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that that it does not induce catapult and it does not grate Sylviidae hold is wrong.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the tobogganist is a used.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the tobogganist is alienable.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the tobogganist is hypercatalectic.; int6 & sent25 -> int7: that the tobogganist does induce habited hold.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__