the butylene is non-postprandial and it is not microelectronics.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it fends and/or does meet distressed is not correct. sent2: there is something such that the fact that that it is microelectronics or it seeks chancel or both is right is not true. sent3: that the door either is harmful or does meet Ethelbert or both does not hold. sent4: if a rheumatologist is hematopoietic it does not seek chancel. sent5: there is something such that it does not fend. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that either it does meet eryngo or it meets Pseudocolus or both is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the trousseau is a rheumatologist is not incorrect the anchorage is a rheumatologist. sent8: the erosion is rhizoidal if the anchorage is not a rheumatologist. sent9: if the fact that something meets distressed and is postprandial is wrong then it is not postprandial. sent10: the marlin is a kind of a Gallinago if the willowware does scour. sent11: the willowware is rhizoidal and/or it scours if that the anchorage does not seek chancel hold. sent12: the fact that that the trousseau is hematopoietic and is not a rheumatologist does not hold is correct if there exists something such that it is a Gallinago. sent13: the marlin is rhizoidal if the willowware is a Gallinago. sent14: if there is something such that it is a Gallinago that the butylene is not postprandial and it is not microelectronics is not right. sent15: the anchorage is not a kind of a rheumatologist or is not rhizoidal or both if the willowware is not hematopoietic. sent16: there is nothing such that it does meet distressed and is postprandial. sent17: the anchorage is hematopoietic if there exists something such that the fact that it is harmful and/or it meets Ethelbert does not hold. sent18: if something is not a rheumatologist then it is not postprandial and it is hematopoietic. sent19: the door is harmful if the willowware is harmful. sent20: the marlin is a rheumatologist. sent21: if something is not a kind of a scours the willowware is not hematopoietic but it does seek chancel. sent22: the marlin is a Gallinago if the willowware is rhizoidal. sent23: if the fact that the anchorage is not rhizoidal is right that the erosion is rhizoidal hold. sent24: there is something such that it does not meet nanotechnology. sent25: the trousseau is a rheumatologist if there exists something such that that it fends or does meet distressed or both is wrong. sent26: there exists something such that it is not harmful.
sent3 -> int1: there is something such that that either it is harmful or it does meet Ethelbert or both is not correct.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the anchorage is hematopoietic.; sent1 & sent25 -> int3: the trousseau is a rheumatologist.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the anchorage is a rheumatologist hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the anchorage is a rheumatologist and it is hematopoietic.; sent4 -> int6: the anchorage does not seek chancel if it is a rheumatologist and it is hematopoietic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the anchorage does not seek chancel.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the fact that either the willowware is rhizoidal or it does scour or both is not incorrect.; int8 & sent22 & sent10 -> int9: the marlin is a kind of a Gallinago.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a Gallinago.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the erosion is rhizoidal.
sent16 -> int11: the fact that the butylene does meet distressed and is postprandial is wrong.; sent9 -> int12: if that the butylene does meet distressed and it is postprandial is not true then it is not postprandial.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the butylene is not postprandial.;
$hypothesis$ = the butylene is non-postprandial and it is not microelectronics. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it fends and/or does meet distressed is not correct. sent2: there is something such that the fact that that it is microelectronics or it seeks chancel or both is right is not true. sent3: that the door either is harmful or does meet Ethelbert or both does not hold. sent4: if a rheumatologist is hematopoietic it does not seek chancel. sent5: there is something such that it does not fend. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that either it does meet eryngo or it meets Pseudocolus or both is not correct. sent7: if the fact that the trousseau is a rheumatologist is not incorrect the anchorage is a rheumatologist. sent8: the erosion is rhizoidal if the anchorage is not a rheumatologist. sent9: if the fact that something meets distressed and is postprandial is wrong then it is not postprandial. sent10: the marlin is a kind of a Gallinago if the willowware does scour. sent11: the willowware is rhizoidal and/or it scours if that the anchorage does not seek chancel hold. sent12: the fact that that the trousseau is hematopoietic and is not a rheumatologist does not hold is correct if there exists something such that it is a Gallinago. sent13: the marlin is rhizoidal if the willowware is a Gallinago. sent14: if there is something such that it is a Gallinago that the butylene is not postprandial and it is not microelectronics is not right. sent15: the anchorage is not a kind of a rheumatologist or is not rhizoidal or both if the willowware is not hematopoietic. sent16: there is nothing such that it does meet distressed and is postprandial. sent17: the anchorage is hematopoietic if there exists something such that the fact that it is harmful and/or it meets Ethelbert does not hold. sent18: if something is not a rheumatologist then it is not postprandial and it is hematopoietic. sent19: the door is harmful if the willowware is harmful. sent20: the marlin is a rheumatologist. sent21: if something is not a kind of a scours the willowware is not hematopoietic but it does seek chancel. sent22: the marlin is a Gallinago if the willowware is rhizoidal. sent23: if the fact that the anchorage is not rhizoidal is right that the erosion is rhizoidal hold. sent24: there is something such that it does not meet nanotechnology. sent25: the trousseau is a rheumatologist if there exists something such that that it fends or does meet distressed or both is wrong. sent26: there exists something such that it is not harmful. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there is something such that that either it is harmful or it does meet Ethelbert or both is not correct.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the anchorage is hematopoietic.; sent1 & sent25 -> int3: the trousseau is a rheumatologist.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the anchorage is a rheumatologist hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the anchorage is a rheumatologist and it is hematopoietic.; sent4 -> int6: the anchorage does not seek chancel if it is a rheumatologist and it is hematopoietic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the anchorage does not seek chancel.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the fact that either the willowware is rhizoidal or it does scour or both is not incorrect.; int8 & sent22 & sent10 -> int9: the marlin is a kind of a Gallinago.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a Gallinago.; int10 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__