the catcher does not occur.
sent1: that the catcher occurs is true if the fact that the heritage occurs and the overreaching twin does not occur is not right. sent2: if the depersonalization occurs then that the overreaching Malthus does not occur but the buccalness happens is false. sent3: that the heist does not occur or that the energeticness does not occur or both is brought about by that the aiming does not occur. sent4: that the heritage but not the overreaching twin happens is wrong if that the roll occurs is not wrong. sent5: that if the catcher occurs then the fact that the depersonalization happens but the bubonicness does not occur is not true hold. sent6: if not the depersonalization but the bubonicness occurs then the catcher does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the depersonalization and the non-bubonicness occurs is wrong the basketball occurs. sent8: the bubonicness occurs. sent9: the rolling occurs if the bronchoscopicness does not occur. sent10: the overreaching Malthus does not occur and the buccalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the depersonalization occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the overreaching Malthus does not occur but the buccalness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the depersonalization does not occur.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the depersonalization does not occur but the bubonicness occurs.; int4 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the basketball occurs hold.
$hypothesis$ = the catcher does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the catcher occurs is true if the fact that the heritage occurs and the overreaching twin does not occur is not right. sent2: if the depersonalization occurs then that the overreaching Malthus does not occur but the buccalness happens is false. sent3: that the heist does not occur or that the energeticness does not occur or both is brought about by that the aiming does not occur. sent4: that the heritage but not the overreaching twin happens is wrong if that the roll occurs is not wrong. sent5: that if the catcher occurs then the fact that the depersonalization happens but the bubonicness does not occur is not true hold. sent6: if not the depersonalization but the bubonicness occurs then the catcher does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the depersonalization and the non-bubonicness occurs is wrong the basketball occurs. sent8: the bubonicness occurs. sent9: the rolling occurs if the bronchoscopicness does not occur. sent10: the overreaching Malthus does not occur and the buccalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the depersonalization occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the overreaching Malthus does not occur but the buccalness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the depersonalization does not occur.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the depersonalization does not occur but the bubonicness occurs.; int4 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__