the freelanceness happens.
sent1: the fact that the titillating does not occur and the empiricism occurs does not hold. sent2: the fact that both the non-directionalness and the operation occurs is incorrect if the evasion does not occur. sent3: that not the directionalness but the operation happens is triggered by the freelancing. sent4: the evasion does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freelanceness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-directionalness and the operation occurs.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: that the non-directionalness and the operation happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the titillating does not occur and the empiricism occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the freelanceness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the titillating does not occur and the empiricism occurs does not hold. sent2: the fact that both the non-directionalness and the operation occurs is incorrect if the evasion does not occur. sent3: that not the directionalness but the operation happens is triggered by the freelancing. sent4: the evasion does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freelanceness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-directionalness and the operation occurs.; sent2 & sent4 -> int2: that the non-directionalness and the operation happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__