the msasa is not dermatologic.
sent1: if the fact that something is not caloric is right it is a brasserie. sent2: something that is not unreportable is a kind of a diabetic and does not bankrupt Tyto. sent3: the Wampanoag is not a kind of a slab. sent4: the reproducer does not bankrupt Tyto. sent5: the Wampanoag is not a Planococcus. sent6: The Tyto does not bankrupt reproducer. sent7: something that is not a caboose is not convenient. sent8: if the Wampanoag is a clout but it does not bankrupt expectation then the msasa is not dermatologic. sent9: if there is something such that it is a coal then the Wampanoag either does coal or is convenient or both. sent10: the reproducer is not a diabetic and/or it is not a coal if it does not bankrupt Tyto. sent11: the Jacquard does not stunt formalism if the fact that it does bankrupt Tyto is true. sent12: that that the reproducer is a ganoid and is a clout is correct does not hold if there exists something such that it does not bankrupt Tyto. sent13: if the fact that something does stunt Wampanoag and is expansionist does not hold then it is not an absolutist. sent14: the fact that the reproducer is not a Planococcus is correct if the Wampanoag is both a caboose and not a clout. sent15: the reproducer is not dermatologic. sent16: something is convenient if it is not a kind of a diabetic and/or is not a coal. sent17: if the reproducer is not a caboose then it is not convenient. sent18: that the Wampanoag is not a kind of a ganoid is true if the fact that it clouts and it does not bankrupt expectation is wrong. sent19: if the quick is a diabetic that does not bankrupt Tyto the reproducer does coal. sent20: if that something is a Planococcus and it is a caboose does not hold it is not convenient. sent21: if the Wampanoag is not a caboose then the msasa is a Planococcus and it is a kind of a ganoid. sent22: the msasa is either non-dermatologic or inconvenient or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Wampanoag is a clout and does not bankrupt expectation is not true.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the Wampanoag is not a ganoid.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a ganoid.; sent20 -> int3: if the fact that the reproducer is both a Planococcus and a caboose does not hold then it is not convenient.; sent16 -> int4: that the reproducer is convenient hold if it is not a diabetic and/or it does not coal.; sent10 & sent4 -> int5: either the reproducer is not a kind of a diabetic or it is not a kind of a coal or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the reproducer is convenient.;
the msasa is not non-dermatologic.
sent2 -> int7: if the topping is not unreportable it is a kind of a diabetic and it does not bankrupt Tyto.;
$hypothesis$ = the msasa is not dermatologic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not caloric is right it is a brasserie. sent2: something that is not unreportable is a kind of a diabetic and does not bankrupt Tyto. sent3: the Wampanoag is not a kind of a slab. sent4: the reproducer does not bankrupt Tyto. sent5: the Wampanoag is not a Planococcus. sent6: The Tyto does not bankrupt reproducer. sent7: something that is not a caboose is not convenient. sent8: if the Wampanoag is a clout but it does not bankrupt expectation then the msasa is not dermatologic. sent9: if there is something such that it is a coal then the Wampanoag either does coal or is convenient or both. sent10: the reproducer is not a diabetic and/or it is not a coal if it does not bankrupt Tyto. sent11: the Jacquard does not stunt formalism if the fact that it does bankrupt Tyto is true. sent12: that that the reproducer is a ganoid and is a clout is correct does not hold if there exists something such that it does not bankrupt Tyto. sent13: if the fact that something does stunt Wampanoag and is expansionist does not hold then it is not an absolutist. sent14: the fact that the reproducer is not a Planococcus is correct if the Wampanoag is both a caboose and not a clout. sent15: the reproducer is not dermatologic. sent16: something is convenient if it is not a kind of a diabetic and/or is not a coal. sent17: if the reproducer is not a caboose then it is not convenient. sent18: that the Wampanoag is not a kind of a ganoid is true if the fact that it clouts and it does not bankrupt expectation is wrong. sent19: if the quick is a diabetic that does not bankrupt Tyto the reproducer does coal. sent20: if that something is a Planococcus and it is a caboose does not hold it is not convenient. sent21: if the Wampanoag is not a caboose then the msasa is a Planococcus and it is a kind of a ganoid. sent22: the msasa is either non-dermatologic or inconvenient or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Wampanoag is a clout and does not bankrupt expectation is not true.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the Wampanoag is not a ganoid.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a ganoid.; sent20 -> int3: if the fact that the reproducer is both a Planococcus and a caboose does not hold then it is not convenient.; sent16 -> int4: that the reproducer is convenient hold if it is not a diabetic and/or it does not coal.; sent10 & sent4 -> int5: either the reproducer is not a kind of a diabetic or it is not a kind of a coal or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the reproducer is convenient.; __UNKNOWN__