the ramrod is a Volvox and does chuckle.
sent1: if the fact that the ringmaster is not a bracteole is correct then the ramrod does chuckle and is Jesuitical. sent2: the macon is a forehead. sent3: the fact that either the ordainer does name or it does not nest ectrodactyly or both is not correct if the macon does nest ectrodactyly. sent4: if there is something such that it is not Jesuitical the fact that the ramrod does abdicate and/or it is a SACLANT is wrong. sent5: if the fact that something is tactical and/or neglects ramrod is wrong the fact that it is not a forehead is correct. sent6: if the ramrod is not a forehead then it is a kind of a Volvox. sent7: something is not a SACLANT if that it is a SACLANT and does not neglect ramrod is wrong. sent8: if that something either does name or does not nest ectrodactyly or both is incorrect it is not a kind of a SACLANT. sent9: the ringmaster is not a kind of a bracteole. sent10: if the macon does abdicate then it does nest ectrodactyly. sent11: that either the ramrod is tactical or it does neglect ramrod or both is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a SACLANT.
sent8 -> int1: if that the ordainer does name and/or does not nest ectrodactyly does not hold then it is not a SACLANT.; sent5 -> int2: if that the ramrod is tactical and/or neglects ramrod is not true it is not a kind of a forehead.; sent1 & sent9 -> int3: the ramrod does chuckle and is Jesuitical.; int3 -> int4: the ramrod does chuckle.;
the ramrod nests ectrodactyly.
sent7 -> int5: if the fact that the macon is a SACLANT but it does not neglect ramrod is wrong it is not a SACLANT.;
$hypothesis$ = the ramrod is a Volvox and does chuckle. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the ringmaster is not a bracteole is correct then the ramrod does chuckle and is Jesuitical. sent2: the macon is a forehead. sent3: the fact that either the ordainer does name or it does not nest ectrodactyly or both is not correct if the macon does nest ectrodactyly. sent4: if there is something such that it is not Jesuitical the fact that the ramrod does abdicate and/or it is a SACLANT is wrong. sent5: if the fact that something is tactical and/or neglects ramrod is wrong the fact that it is not a forehead is correct. sent6: if the ramrod is not a forehead then it is a kind of a Volvox. sent7: something is not a SACLANT if that it is a SACLANT and does not neglect ramrod is wrong. sent8: if that something either does name or does not nest ectrodactyly or both is incorrect it is not a kind of a SACLANT. sent9: the ringmaster is not a kind of a bracteole. sent10: if the macon does abdicate then it does nest ectrodactyly. sent11: that either the ramrod is tactical or it does neglect ramrod or both is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a SACLANT. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if that the ordainer does name and/or does not nest ectrodactyly does not hold then it is not a SACLANT.; sent5 -> int2: if that the ramrod is tactical and/or neglects ramrod is not true it is not a kind of a forehead.; sent1 & sent9 -> int3: the ramrod does chuckle and is Jesuitical.; int3 -> int4: the ramrod does chuckle.; __UNKNOWN__