the eventuality does not occur.
sent1: the inelegantness occurs. sent2: if the unfurling happens the eventuality occurs. sent3: that the blocking does not occur and the sedimentariness does not occur is incorrect. sent4: if the narrowness does not occur the salvificness happens. sent5: that not the mulling but the swooping happens is triggered by the unfurling. sent6: the narrow does not occur and the deterrence happens if the gearing palindrome does not occur. sent7: the fact that the gearing palindrome happens and the deterrence happens is not true if the marliness does not occur. sent8: not the wanton but the gearing projectile happens. sent9: the salableness does not occur and the cambering opportuneness does not occur. sent10: if that the anchorage and the salvificness occurs hold the eventuality does not occur. sent11: the gearing palindrome does not occur. sent12: if that the blocking does not occur and the sedimentariness does not occur is false the prejudicing smear occurs. sent13: not the unfurling but the anchorage occurs if the details does not occur. sent14: that the salableness does not occur and the cambering opportuneness does not occur prevents that the details happens. sent15: that both the unsalableness and the cambering opportuneness happens prevents that the details happens. sent16: the metallurgicalness happens if the prejudicing smear occurs. sent17: the non-marliness is caused by that the metallurgicalness happens and the mioticness happens.
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: the details does not occur.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: not the unfurling but the anchorage happens.; int2 -> int3: the anchorage happens.; sent6 & sent11 -> int4: the narrowing does not occur but the deterrence happens.; int4 -> int5: that the narrow does not occur is correct.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the salvificness happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the anchorage happens and the salvificness occurs.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the mull does not occur and the swooping occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the eventuality does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the inelegantness occurs. sent2: if the unfurling happens the eventuality occurs. sent3: that the blocking does not occur and the sedimentariness does not occur is incorrect. sent4: if the narrowness does not occur the salvificness happens. sent5: that not the mulling but the swooping happens is triggered by the unfurling. sent6: the narrow does not occur and the deterrence happens if the gearing palindrome does not occur. sent7: the fact that the gearing palindrome happens and the deterrence happens is not true if the marliness does not occur. sent8: not the wanton but the gearing projectile happens. sent9: the salableness does not occur and the cambering opportuneness does not occur. sent10: if that the anchorage and the salvificness occurs hold the eventuality does not occur. sent11: the gearing palindrome does not occur. sent12: if that the blocking does not occur and the sedimentariness does not occur is false the prejudicing smear occurs. sent13: not the unfurling but the anchorage occurs if the details does not occur. sent14: that the salableness does not occur and the cambering opportuneness does not occur prevents that the details happens. sent15: that both the unsalableness and the cambering opportuneness happens prevents that the details happens. sent16: the metallurgicalness happens if the prejudicing smear occurs. sent17: the non-marliness is caused by that the metallurgicalness happens and the mioticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: the details does not occur.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: not the unfurling but the anchorage happens.; int2 -> int3: the anchorage happens.; sent6 & sent11 -> int4: the narrowing does not occur but the deterrence happens.; int4 -> int5: that the narrow does not occur is correct.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the salvificness happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the anchorage happens and the salvificness occurs.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__