the gardener is catoptrics.
sent1: the sawhorse is unconventional if the copywriter is a kind of a aerator. sent2: if something crabs then it is not unconventional and/or it is a aerator. sent3: if that something is a whippoorwill and does glamorize Minsk is not true it is not a kind of a whippoorwill. sent4: if that the gardener is unconventional is not wrong then it is catoptrics. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a whippoorwill the fact that the AS is a whippoorwill and does glamorize Minsk does not hold. sent6: the settle is Mercurial. sent7: if that the settle is Mercurial is not wrong then the copywriter is a crab. sent8: the copywriter is a perennation. sent9: if the copywriter is not unconventional that the sawhorse is not a kind of a perennation and it is not a aerator is not true. sent10: if there exists something such that it is shambolic then the gardener concretizes endocrine and is baboonish. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a whippoorwill. sent12: the endocrine is a Scandinavian and it is not non-shambolic if the AS is not a kind of a whippoorwill. sent13: if the copywriter is a kind of a perennation it is a aerator. sent14: the copywriter is catoptrics if there is something such that it concretizes endocrine and is baboonish. sent15: something is not unconventional if it is catoptrics and it is a crab. sent16: the copywriter crabs if it does concretize endocrine.
sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the copywriter is a kind of a aerator.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the sawhorse is unconventional hold.;
the gardener is not catoptrics.
sent2 -> int3: if the copywriter does crab it is not unconventional and/or it is a aerator.;
$hypothesis$ = the gardener is catoptrics. ; $context$ = sent1: the sawhorse is unconventional if the copywriter is a kind of a aerator. sent2: if something crabs then it is not unconventional and/or it is a aerator. sent3: if that something is a whippoorwill and does glamorize Minsk is not true it is not a kind of a whippoorwill. sent4: if that the gardener is unconventional is not wrong then it is catoptrics. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a whippoorwill the fact that the AS is a whippoorwill and does glamorize Minsk does not hold. sent6: the settle is Mercurial. sent7: if that the settle is Mercurial is not wrong then the copywriter is a crab. sent8: the copywriter is a perennation. sent9: if the copywriter is not unconventional that the sawhorse is not a kind of a perennation and it is not a aerator is not true. sent10: if there exists something such that it is shambolic then the gardener concretizes endocrine and is baboonish. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a whippoorwill. sent12: the endocrine is a Scandinavian and it is not non-shambolic if the AS is not a kind of a whippoorwill. sent13: if the copywriter is a kind of a perennation it is a aerator. sent14: the copywriter is catoptrics if there is something such that it concretizes endocrine and is baboonish. sent15: something is not unconventional if it is catoptrics and it is a crab. sent16: the copywriter crabs if it does concretize endocrine. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the copywriter is a kind of a aerator.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the sawhorse is unconventional hold.; __UNKNOWN__