that something does demilitarize and it is same is not correct.
sent1: the fizz does demilitarize. sent2: the fizz does eliminate carbonated if there is something such that that it does not demilitarize and is not a Plavix is not correct. sent3: something is translational and does interrelate Abadan. sent4: the spender is same and is a kind of a demonstrativeness if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Arno. sent5: the fizz unmakes Latium. sent6: the Maxzide does unmake winnings and it does demilitarize. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Guadeloupe then the fact that the petard does eliminate CSE is not wrong. sent8: if that something does not demilitarize but it is same is not right it demilitarize. sent9: the abnegator is a kind of a doubler and is not a CIM. sent10: that if the platinum is not the demonstrativeness then the fact that the platinum is a Guadeloupe but it does not eliminate CSE does not hold is not wrong. sent11: if the abnegator is a doubler and is not a CIM it is not a Guadeloupe. sent12: the fizz is mesial if the platinum is same. sent13: the fact that the fizz is same hold. sent14: the fizz is mesial if the platinum is mesial. sent15: the platinum is mesial or is same or both if there exists something such that it is same. sent16: something does unmake butyrin and it is a reallotment. sent17: there is something such that it demilitarizes. sent18: the servo is same. sent19: if something eliminates CSE the fact that it does not demilitarize and is not a Plavix is not true. sent20: something is same. sent21: something does eliminate carbonated. sent22: that the polls is not a Arno is correct if something is translational thing that interrelates Abadan.
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the fizz demilitarizes and it is same.; int1 -> hypothesis;
something eliminates carbonated and it is mesial.
sent19 -> int2: if the petard eliminates CSE then that it does not demilitarize and it is not a Plavix is not true.; sent11 & sent9 -> int3: the abnegator is not a Guadeloupe.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Guadeloupe.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the petard eliminates CSE.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the petard does not demilitarize and is not a Plavix does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it does not demilitarize and it is not a Plavix is not correct.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the fizz eliminates carbonated.; sent3 & sent22 -> int9: the polls is not a Arno.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a Arno.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the spender is a kind of same a demonstrativeness.; int11 -> int12: the spender is same.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is same is not incorrect.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the platinum is mesial and/or is same.; int14 & sent14 & sent12 -> int15: the fizz is mesial.; int8 & int15 -> int16: the fizz does eliminate carbonated and it is mesial.; int16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that something does demilitarize and it is same is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fizz does demilitarize. sent2: the fizz does eliminate carbonated if there is something such that that it does not demilitarize and is not a Plavix is not correct. sent3: something is translational and does interrelate Abadan. sent4: the spender is same and is a kind of a demonstrativeness if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Arno. sent5: the fizz unmakes Latium. sent6: the Maxzide does unmake winnings and it does demilitarize. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Guadeloupe then the fact that the petard does eliminate CSE is not wrong. sent8: if that something does not demilitarize but it is same is not right it demilitarize. sent9: the abnegator is a kind of a doubler and is not a CIM. sent10: that if the platinum is not the demonstrativeness then the fact that the platinum is a Guadeloupe but it does not eliminate CSE does not hold is not wrong. sent11: if the abnegator is a doubler and is not a CIM it is not a Guadeloupe. sent12: the fizz is mesial if the platinum is same. sent13: the fact that the fizz is same hold. sent14: the fizz is mesial if the platinum is mesial. sent15: the platinum is mesial or is same or both if there exists something such that it is same. sent16: something does unmake butyrin and it is a reallotment. sent17: there is something such that it demilitarizes. sent18: the servo is same. sent19: if something eliminates CSE the fact that it does not demilitarize and is not a Plavix is not true. sent20: something is same. sent21: something does eliminate carbonated. sent22: that the polls is not a Arno is correct if something is translational thing that interrelates Abadan. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the fizz demilitarizes and it is same.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__