that the crupper is improbable but it is not a kind of a Passover does not hold.
sent1: if the top is not inelegant then the cabinetmaker is micrometeoritic but it is not incurable. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it does not maintain and it does not excise seeking does not hold then that the yard does excise seeking is not false. sent3: if something does not excise disinclination then it is improbable and it is not a Passover. sent4: the fact that something is unpatriotic and does not excise disinclination does not hold if it is not figurative. sent5: if that the yard is a kind of unpatriotic thing that does not excise disinclination is not true the crupper does not excise disinclination. sent6: the top is not inelegant if something that is unpatriotic excises seeking. sent7: something excises disinclination and it is not non-figurative. sent8: if the cabinetmaker is micrometeoritic the cousin is a in-law. sent9: the yard is unpatriotic if there is something such that it does excise disinclination and it is figurative. sent10: that the crupper is improbable but it is not a kind of a Passover is not right if the cousin is a in-law. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it does not maintain and does not excise seeking is not right.
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the yard is unpatriotic.; sent11 & sent2 -> int2: the yard excises seeking.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the yard is unpatriotic and it excises seeking.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is unpatriotic and it excises seeking.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the top is not inelegant.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the cabinetmaker is micrometeoritic but it is not an incurable.; int6 -> int7: the cabinetmaker is micrometeoritic.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the cousin is a in-law.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the crupper is improbable but it is not a kind of a Passover.
sent3 -> int9: if the crupper does not excise disinclination then it is improbable thing that is not a Passover.; sent4 -> int10: if the yard is not figurative then the fact that it is unpatriotic and does not excise disinclination does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the crupper is improbable but it is not a kind of a Passover does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the top is not inelegant then the cabinetmaker is micrometeoritic but it is not incurable. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it does not maintain and it does not excise seeking does not hold then that the yard does excise seeking is not false. sent3: if something does not excise disinclination then it is improbable and it is not a Passover. sent4: the fact that something is unpatriotic and does not excise disinclination does not hold if it is not figurative. sent5: if that the yard is a kind of unpatriotic thing that does not excise disinclination is not true the crupper does not excise disinclination. sent6: the top is not inelegant if something that is unpatriotic excises seeking. sent7: something excises disinclination and it is not non-figurative. sent8: if the cabinetmaker is micrometeoritic the cousin is a in-law. sent9: the yard is unpatriotic if there is something such that it does excise disinclination and it is figurative. sent10: that the crupper is improbable but it is not a kind of a Passover is not right if the cousin is a in-law. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it does not maintain and does not excise seeking is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the yard is unpatriotic.; sent11 & sent2 -> int2: the yard excises seeking.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the yard is unpatriotic and it excises seeking.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is unpatriotic and it excises seeking.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the top is not inelegant.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the cabinetmaker is micrometeoritic but it is not an incurable.; int6 -> int7: the cabinetmaker is micrometeoritic.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the cousin is a in-law.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__