that there is something such that if it is both not causative and a saccule then the fact that it is not an eruption is correct is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a firebrat and it is vocalic it is not a partialness. sent2: there is something such that if it staples theorem and staples flats it dogmatizes trundle. sent3: there exists something such that if it is socioeconomic and is a kind of a headdress then it is an armband. sent4: something is fisheye if it is a mapping and does bunk yawner. sent5: something is not a kind of an eruption if it is noncausative and is a saccule. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a car and it staples Colinus it is not replaceable. sent7: if the quiver is noncausative and is a kind of a saccule it is an eruption.
sent5 -> int1: if the quiver is both noncausative and a saccule then it is not an eruption.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is both not causative and a saccule then the fact that it is not an eruption is correct is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a firebrat and it is vocalic it is not a partialness. sent2: there is something such that if it staples theorem and staples flats it dogmatizes trundle. sent3: there exists something such that if it is socioeconomic and is a kind of a headdress then it is an armband. sent4: something is fisheye if it is a mapping and does bunk yawner. sent5: something is not a kind of an eruption if it is noncausative and is a saccule. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a car and it staples Colinus it is not replaceable. sent7: if the quiver is noncausative and is a kind of a saccule it is an eruption. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the quiver is both noncausative and a saccule then it is not an eruption.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__