that there is something such that if it foals wonton and is not accessible the fact that it does not sterilize tribute is not wrong is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is allogamous and it is not diaphoretic the fact that it is not a kind of a breakage is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that something foals wonton and is accessible is right then it does not sterilize tribute. sent3: there exists something such that if that it foals wonton and is not accessible is correct then it sterilizes tribute. sent4: if something does foal wonton and is not accessible it does not sterilize tribute. sent5: the Tungus is not a kind of a thyroid if it does foal wonton and it is not an avenue. sent6: the Cairene is not meaningful if it does foal wonton and is a gumwood. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of Anglophobic thing that does not foal pumpernickel the fact that it is not a keeper hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it foals wonton and it is accessible then it does not sterilize tribute. sent9: there exists something such that if it does course and it is not a Megapodius then it does not sterilize confit. sent10: there is something such that if it is uncongenial and it is not monatomic it is not a precipice. sent11: if something foals wonton but it is not accessible then that it does sterilize tribute is not incorrect. sent12: the Cairene does not sterilize tribute if it does foal wonton and is accessible. sent13: the fact that the Cairene sterilizes tribute is not wrong if that it foals wonton and it is not accessible is not false.
sent4 -> int1: the Cairene does not sterilize tribute if it foals wonton and it is not accessible.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it foals wonton and is not accessible the fact that it does not sterilize tribute is not wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is allogamous and it is not diaphoretic the fact that it is not a kind of a breakage is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that something foals wonton and is accessible is right then it does not sterilize tribute. sent3: there exists something such that if that it foals wonton and is not accessible is correct then it sterilizes tribute. sent4: if something does foal wonton and is not accessible it does not sterilize tribute. sent5: the Tungus is not a kind of a thyroid if it does foal wonton and it is not an avenue. sent6: the Cairene is not meaningful if it does foal wonton and is a gumwood. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of Anglophobic thing that does not foal pumpernickel the fact that it is not a keeper hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it foals wonton and it is accessible then it does not sterilize tribute. sent9: there exists something such that if it does course and it is not a Megapodius then it does not sterilize confit. sent10: there is something such that if it is uncongenial and it is not monatomic it is not a precipice. sent11: if something foals wonton but it is not accessible then that it does sterilize tribute is not incorrect. sent12: the Cairene does not sterilize tribute if it does foal wonton and is accessible. sent13: the fact that the Cairene sterilizes tribute is not wrong if that it foals wonton and it is not accessible is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the Cairene does not sterilize tribute if it foals wonton and it is not accessible.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__