the sauerbraten is not a kind of an oversimplification and it does not correspond transient.
sent1: the chemiluminescence is not unshrinkable. sent2: the sauerbraten is not an oversimplification and it does not correspond transient if there is something such that it is not a rainbow. sent3: the chemiluminescence is wasteful. sent4: the fact that the molester is not wasteful is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the chemiluminescence is not incoherent and/or does not satisfice is not true. sent6: the fact that the chemiluminescence is not wasteful and/or does not correspond turntable is not correct. sent7: the chemiluminescence does not correspond transient. sent8: if that the sauerbraten does not correspond turntable and/or it is not a kind of an oversimplification does not hold that it does not correspond transient is correct. sent9: that that the husky is not lithographic or is not an oversimplification or both does not hold is true. sent10: there is something such that it is an oversimplification. sent11: the sauerbraten is not wasteful. sent12: if something is not wasteful that the sauerbraten does not correspond turntable and is not an oversimplification is right. sent13: that the sauerbraten is both not wasteful and not an oversimplification hold if something is not a rainbow. sent14: the fact that the chemiluminescence is not an oversimplification and/or it is not wasteful is not right. sent15: the fact that the chemiluminescence does not correspond transient if something does not correspond turntable is not wrong. sent16: there exists something such that it does not correspond turntable. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is an itinerary is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the sauerbraten is not a kind of an oversimplification and it does not correspond transient. ; $context$ = sent1: the chemiluminescence is not unshrinkable. sent2: the sauerbraten is not an oversimplification and it does not correspond transient if there is something such that it is not a rainbow. sent3: the chemiluminescence is wasteful. sent4: the fact that the molester is not wasteful is not wrong. sent5: the fact that the chemiluminescence is not incoherent and/or does not satisfice is not true. sent6: the fact that the chemiluminescence is not wasteful and/or does not correspond turntable is not correct. sent7: the chemiluminescence does not correspond transient. sent8: if that the sauerbraten does not correspond turntable and/or it is not a kind of an oversimplification does not hold that it does not correspond transient is correct. sent9: that that the husky is not lithographic or is not an oversimplification or both does not hold is true. sent10: there is something such that it is an oversimplification. sent11: the sauerbraten is not wasteful. sent12: if something is not wasteful that the sauerbraten does not correspond turntable and is not an oversimplification is right. sent13: that the sauerbraten is both not wasteful and not an oversimplification hold if something is not a rainbow. sent14: the fact that the chemiluminescence is not an oversimplification and/or it is not wasteful is not right. sent15: the fact that the chemiluminescence does not correspond transient if something does not correspond turntable is not wrong. sent16: there exists something such that it does not correspond turntable. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is an itinerary is correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__