the sterilizing salsa does not occur.
sent1: if that the Echo happens is correct then the fact that the bluffing but not the perineotomy occurs does not hold. sent2: the aerobicness does not occur and the venting forestay does not occur. sent3: the fact that the sterilizing reamer does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the jostling but not the thinkableness happens does not hold. sent4: that the bluffing does not occur results in that the sterilizing salsa occurs and the Echo happens. sent5: the bluff does not occur if the megadeath does not occur and the perineotomy does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the bluff happens but the perineotomy does not occur is incorrect the megadeath does not occur. sent7: if the fact that both the non-paroxysmalness and the sterilizing yin occurs does not hold then the sterilizing yin does not occur. sent8: if the perceptibleness does not occur both the obligationalness and the venting pantry occurs. sent9: the perceptibleness does not occur if the fact that the aerobicness and/or the acquisition happens is not correct. sent10: the seesawing does not occur and the scrambling does not occur. sent11: that the Echo does not occur and the stocktake does not occur is caused by that the bluff does not occur. sent12: if the perceptibleness does not occur then the venting pantry and/or the sterilizing salsa happens. sent13: if the Echo does not occur then that the seesawing does not occur and the scramble does not occur is false. sent14: if the sterilizing reamer does not occur then the fact that not the paroxysmalness but the sterilizing yin occurs is not true. sent15: that that the non-pictorialness and the travelogue occurs hold is false. sent16: if the sterilizing yin does not occur then the fact that either the aerobicness or the acquisition or both happens is false. sent17: if the obligationalness does not occur or the venting pantry does not occur or both then that the sterilizing salsa does not occur is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Echo does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the seesaw does not occur and the scrambling does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Echo occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the bluffing but not the perineotomy occurs does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the megadeath does not occur is not incorrect.;
the sterilizing salsa happens.
$hypothesis$ = the sterilizing salsa does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Echo happens is correct then the fact that the bluffing but not the perineotomy occurs does not hold. sent2: the aerobicness does not occur and the venting forestay does not occur. sent3: the fact that the sterilizing reamer does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the jostling but not the thinkableness happens does not hold. sent4: that the bluffing does not occur results in that the sterilizing salsa occurs and the Echo happens. sent5: the bluff does not occur if the megadeath does not occur and the perineotomy does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the bluff happens but the perineotomy does not occur is incorrect the megadeath does not occur. sent7: if the fact that both the non-paroxysmalness and the sterilizing yin occurs does not hold then the sterilizing yin does not occur. sent8: if the perceptibleness does not occur both the obligationalness and the venting pantry occurs. sent9: the perceptibleness does not occur if the fact that the aerobicness and/or the acquisition happens is not correct. sent10: the seesawing does not occur and the scrambling does not occur. sent11: that the Echo does not occur and the stocktake does not occur is caused by that the bluff does not occur. sent12: if the perceptibleness does not occur then the venting pantry and/or the sterilizing salsa happens. sent13: if the Echo does not occur then that the seesawing does not occur and the scramble does not occur is false. sent14: if the sterilizing reamer does not occur then the fact that not the paroxysmalness but the sterilizing yin occurs is not true. sent15: that that the non-pictorialness and the travelogue occurs hold is false. sent16: if the sterilizing yin does not occur then the fact that either the aerobicness or the acquisition or both happens is false. sent17: if the obligationalness does not occur or the venting pantry does not occur or both then that the sterilizing salsa does not occur is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Echo does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the seesaw does not occur and the scrambling does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Echo occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the bluffing but not the perineotomy occurs does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the megadeath does not occur is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__