there is something such that if it is a marbled and a commute then it is not a segregation.
sent1: if the pathway is both a commute and a teamwork then it is not a Acer. sent2: there is something such that if it is a marbled and it is a commute then it is a segregation. sent3: something is a segregation if it marbles and it is a kind of a commute. sent4: if something is a marbled and a commute it is not a segregation. sent5: if the pathway is a kind of a marbled and commutes it is a segregation. sent6: if something is vestibular and it capers hawala it is not a Acer.
sent4 -> int1: the pathway is not a segregation if it is a marbled and it is a commute.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is vestibular and it does caper hawala then it is not a Acer.
sent6 -> int2: if the apposition is a kind of vestibular thing that capers hawala it is not a kind of a Acer.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a marbled and a commute then it is not a segregation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pathway is both a commute and a teamwork then it is not a Acer. sent2: there is something such that if it is a marbled and it is a commute then it is a segregation. sent3: something is a segregation if it marbles and it is a kind of a commute. sent4: if something is a marbled and a commute it is not a segregation. sent5: if the pathway is a kind of a marbled and commutes it is a segregation. sent6: if something is vestibular and it capers hawala it is not a Acer. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the pathway is not a segregation if it is a marbled and it is a commute.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__