the fact that the inductor is a sublimity and/or it is eosinophilic does not hold.
sent1: something does not narrow demantoid if that it is not a sublimity and it does not jiggle conto is not correct. sent2: if the fact that something is an oriented that jiggles conto does not hold the fact that it does not jiggles conto hold. sent3: if the fact that something is a kind of earless thing that does not narrow demantoid does not hold then the fact that it does jiggle conto is right. sent4: the fact that that the pasteboard is earless but it does not narrow demantoid is incorrect if there exists something such that it does narrow chromolithography is right. sent5: something does narrow regularity if that it is earless and it does not narrow chromolithography does not hold. sent6: if the mesenchyme does jiggle conto and it does narrow regularity then it is not earless. sent7: if that the mesenchyme narrows regularity and does not narrow chromolithography is incorrect then the inductor is a kind of a sublimity. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an oriented. sent9: that the mesenchyme narrows regularity but it does not narrow chromolithography is not correct if that the borrower does not narrow chromolithography is right. sent10: the inductor does not narrow chromolithography if that the pasteboard does not narrow chromolithography and it does not narrow demantoid is incorrect. sent11: if something does not orient that the pasteboard is an orient that jiggles conto is wrong. sent12: if the fact that the counselor is a kind of a ratiocination is right then the mesenchyme jiggles conto. sent13: the counselor is a ratiocination or it is a kind of an absolutist or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the borrower narrows chromolithography.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it narrows chromolithography.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the pasteboard is earless but it does not narrow demantoid is incorrect.; sent3 -> int3: if the fact that the pasteboard is a kind of earless thing that does not narrow demantoid is not right then it does jiggle conto.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pasteboard does jiggle conto.; sent2 -> int5: the pasteboard does not jiggle conto if the fact that it is a kind of an oriented and it does jiggle conto is false.; sent8 & sent11 -> int6: that the pasteboard is an oriented and it jiggles conto does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the pasteboard does not jiggle conto.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the borrower does not narrow chromolithography.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the fact that the mesenchyme does narrow regularity but it does not narrow chromolithography is incorrect.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the inductor is a sublimity.; int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the inductor either is a kind of a sublimity or is eosinophilic or both does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inductor is a sublimity and/or it is eosinophilic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not narrow demantoid if that it is not a sublimity and it does not jiggle conto is not correct. sent2: if the fact that something is an oriented that jiggles conto does not hold the fact that it does not jiggles conto hold. sent3: if the fact that something is a kind of earless thing that does not narrow demantoid does not hold then the fact that it does jiggle conto is right. sent4: the fact that that the pasteboard is earless but it does not narrow demantoid is incorrect if there exists something such that it does narrow chromolithography is right. sent5: something does narrow regularity if that it is earless and it does not narrow chromolithography does not hold. sent6: if the mesenchyme does jiggle conto and it does narrow regularity then it is not earless. sent7: if that the mesenchyme narrows regularity and does not narrow chromolithography is incorrect then the inductor is a kind of a sublimity. sent8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an oriented. sent9: that the mesenchyme narrows regularity but it does not narrow chromolithography is not correct if that the borrower does not narrow chromolithography is right. sent10: the inductor does not narrow chromolithography if that the pasteboard does not narrow chromolithography and it does not narrow demantoid is incorrect. sent11: if something does not orient that the pasteboard is an orient that jiggles conto is wrong. sent12: if the fact that the counselor is a kind of a ratiocination is right then the mesenchyme jiggles conto. sent13: the counselor is a ratiocination or it is a kind of an absolutist or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the borrower narrows chromolithography.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it narrows chromolithography.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the pasteboard is earless but it does not narrow demantoid is incorrect.; sent3 -> int3: if the fact that the pasteboard is a kind of earless thing that does not narrow demantoid is not right then it does jiggle conto.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pasteboard does jiggle conto.; sent2 -> int5: the pasteboard does not jiggle conto if the fact that it is a kind of an oriented and it does jiggle conto is false.; sent8 & sent11 -> int6: that the pasteboard is an oriented and it jiggles conto does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the pasteboard does not jiggle conto.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the borrower does not narrow chromolithography.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the fact that the mesenchyme does narrow regularity but it does not narrow chromolithography is incorrect.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the inductor is a sublimity.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__