the noncandidate is either unpeaceful or a narrow or both.
sent1: the fact that the emmer does not subtilize blackcap and is a Iraqi is false if the noncandidate is not a kind of a Iraqi. sent2: the noncandidate does not cloy if it does not subtilize blackcap and it does not subtilize dissatisfaction. sent3: the onyx is kafkaesque. sent4: the noncandidate narrows if the fact that it does not cloy and is not a kind of a Iraqi is right. sent5: the noncandidate does not subtilize blackcap if the emmer cloys and is unpeaceful. sent6: the emmer is a kind of non-Iraqi thing that does not festoon blanquillo. sent7: the emmer does not birdnest redshift and it is not narrow. sent8: if the emmer does not festoon jaggery and it does not narrow the fact that it is a oscine is true. sent9: the noncandidate festoons jaggery. sent10: the liverwurst does not festoon blanquillo if the noncandidate is a kind of a Iraqi and it festoons jaggery. sent11: The jaggery festoons noncandidate. sent12: the table is both a pirouette and Iraqi. sent13: the fact that the onyx is not kafkaesque is correct if that the emmer is not a oscine and does not festoon blanquillo is wrong. sent14: the onyx is a kind of non-hatless thing that does not strand noncandidate. sent15: the emmer is not a piracy and it is not abranchiate. sent16: something festoons jaggery if it is kafkaesque. sent17: the fact that something does not festoon blanquillo and is not non-Iraqi is not true if it festoons jaggery. sent18: that the fact that the emmer does not festoon jaggery and does not festoon blanquillo does not hold hold if the noncandidate does not festoon blanquillo. sent19: the liverwurst does not wrong. sent20: if the fact that the emmer does not festoon blanquillo but it is not non-Iraqi is wrong then the liverwurst is not a non-Iraqi. sent21: the noncandidate does not subtilize blackcap and does not subtilize dissatisfaction. sent22: the onyx does not subtilize dissatisfaction. sent23: if the liverwurst is non-narrow thing that does not cloy it does not festoon blanquillo. sent24: the onyx cloys.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noncandidate is a kind of a Iraqi.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the noncandidate is Iraqi and it does festoon jaggery.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the liverwurst does not festoon blanquillo.; sent2 & sent21 -> int3: the noncandidate does not cloy.;
the fact that the noncandidate is unpeaceful and/or not non-narrow is not correct.
sent17 -> int4: that the emmer does not festoon blanquillo but it is a kind of a Iraqi is not right if it festoons jaggery.; sent16 -> int5: if the emmer is not non-kafkaesque then the fact that it does festoon jaggery hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the noncandidate is either unpeaceful or a narrow or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the emmer does not subtilize blackcap and is a Iraqi is false if the noncandidate is not a kind of a Iraqi. sent2: the noncandidate does not cloy if it does not subtilize blackcap and it does not subtilize dissatisfaction. sent3: the onyx is kafkaesque. sent4: the noncandidate narrows if the fact that it does not cloy and is not a kind of a Iraqi is right. sent5: the noncandidate does not subtilize blackcap if the emmer cloys and is unpeaceful. sent6: the emmer is a kind of non-Iraqi thing that does not festoon blanquillo. sent7: the emmer does not birdnest redshift and it is not narrow. sent8: if the emmer does not festoon jaggery and it does not narrow the fact that it is a oscine is true. sent9: the noncandidate festoons jaggery. sent10: the liverwurst does not festoon blanquillo if the noncandidate is a kind of a Iraqi and it festoons jaggery. sent11: The jaggery festoons noncandidate. sent12: the table is both a pirouette and Iraqi. sent13: the fact that the onyx is not kafkaesque is correct if that the emmer is not a oscine and does not festoon blanquillo is wrong. sent14: the onyx is a kind of non-hatless thing that does not strand noncandidate. sent15: the emmer is not a piracy and it is not abranchiate. sent16: something festoons jaggery if it is kafkaesque. sent17: the fact that something does not festoon blanquillo and is not non-Iraqi is not true if it festoons jaggery. sent18: that the fact that the emmer does not festoon jaggery and does not festoon blanquillo does not hold hold if the noncandidate does not festoon blanquillo. sent19: the liverwurst does not wrong. sent20: if the fact that the emmer does not festoon blanquillo but it is not non-Iraqi is wrong then the liverwurst is not a non-Iraqi. sent21: the noncandidate does not subtilize blackcap and does not subtilize dissatisfaction. sent22: the onyx does not subtilize dissatisfaction. sent23: if the liverwurst is non-narrow thing that does not cloy it does not festoon blanquillo. sent24: the onyx cloys. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noncandidate is a kind of a Iraqi.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the noncandidate is Iraqi and it does festoon jaggery.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the liverwurst does not festoon blanquillo.; sent2 & sent21 -> int3: the noncandidate does not cloy.; __UNKNOWN__