the relative is not a kind of a needlebush.
sent1: the fact that the shooter invokes grooving and is not a Weizenbier is false if there exists something such that it is a kind of a buzzard. sent2: if the jack-o'-lantern is a needlebush and/or invokes grooving that the relative is not a needlebush is not incorrect. sent3: the relative is a needlebush if the shooter is a Weizenbier. sent4: the warehouse is not inferential if the fact that that the jack-o'-lantern does not invoke grooving and is a Weizenbier hold is wrong. sent5: something is inferential if it is not a Weizenbier. sent6: if the dewlap is not intracellular then the fact that it is a Weizenbier and it is not a buzzard is incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does not invoke grooving but it is a Weizenbier does not hold if it is a needlebush. sent8: if the dewlap does not invoke cheerer the shooter does invoke grooving. sent9: the dewlap socializes micropyle and it is a tabby if it is not rehabilitative. sent10: the barograph is a kind of a buzzard. sent11: that the jack-o'-lantern impregnates and is not inferential is not correct. sent12: the jack-o'-lantern is not inferential. sent13: if something is not inferential the fact that it is a on-license and does not impregnate is not right. sent14: if the dewlap is intracellular and is not a buzzard the jack-o'-lantern is a needlebush. sent15: if that something is inferential hold it is a needlebush. sent16: something stags if it socializes micropyle. sent17: either the lychgate is not a throughput or it is not a cooperative or both. sent18: the shooter does not invoke grooving or is not a buzzard or both. sent19: the shooter invokes grooving if that the dewlap does not impregnate is right. sent20: the dewlap does not impregnate and/or it does not invoke cheerer if the jack-o'-lantern is not inferential. sent21: if something is a kind of a stag then it is intracellular and it is not a buzzard.
sent20 & sent12 -> int1: either the dewlap does not impregnate or it does not invoke cheerer or both.; int1 & sent19 & sent8 -> int2: the shooter invokes grooving.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shooter is not a Weizenbier.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the shooter invokes grooving but it is not a Weizenbier.; sent10 -> int4: something is a buzzard.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the shooter does invoke grooving but it is not a kind of a Weizenbier is wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the shooter is a Weizenbier.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the relative is not a kind of a needlebush.
sent15 -> int8: if the jack-o'-lantern is inferential it is a kind of a needlebush.; sent5 -> int9: if the jack-o'-lantern is not a Weizenbier it is inferential.;
$hypothesis$ = the relative is not a kind of a needlebush. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the shooter invokes grooving and is not a Weizenbier is false if there exists something such that it is a kind of a buzzard. sent2: if the jack-o'-lantern is a needlebush and/or invokes grooving that the relative is not a needlebush is not incorrect. sent3: the relative is a needlebush if the shooter is a Weizenbier. sent4: the warehouse is not inferential if the fact that that the jack-o'-lantern does not invoke grooving and is a Weizenbier hold is wrong. sent5: something is inferential if it is not a Weizenbier. sent6: if the dewlap is not intracellular then the fact that it is a Weizenbier and it is not a buzzard is incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does not invoke grooving but it is a Weizenbier does not hold if it is a needlebush. sent8: if the dewlap does not invoke cheerer the shooter does invoke grooving. sent9: the dewlap socializes micropyle and it is a tabby if it is not rehabilitative. sent10: the barograph is a kind of a buzzard. sent11: that the jack-o'-lantern impregnates and is not inferential is not correct. sent12: the jack-o'-lantern is not inferential. sent13: if something is not inferential the fact that it is a on-license and does not impregnate is not right. sent14: if the dewlap is intracellular and is not a buzzard the jack-o'-lantern is a needlebush. sent15: if that something is inferential hold it is a needlebush. sent16: something stags if it socializes micropyle. sent17: either the lychgate is not a throughput or it is not a cooperative or both. sent18: the shooter does not invoke grooving or is not a buzzard or both. sent19: the shooter invokes grooving if that the dewlap does not impregnate is right. sent20: the dewlap does not impregnate and/or it does not invoke cheerer if the jack-o'-lantern is not inferential. sent21: if something is a kind of a stag then it is intracellular and it is not a buzzard. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent12 -> int1: either the dewlap does not impregnate or it does not invoke cheerer or both.; int1 & sent19 & sent8 -> int2: the shooter invokes grooving.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the shooter is not a Weizenbier.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the shooter invokes grooving but it is not a Weizenbier.; sent10 -> int4: something is a buzzard.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the shooter does invoke grooving but it is not a kind of a Weizenbier is wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the shooter is a Weizenbier.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__