the fact that the snuffling migrator does not occur but the knockout happens does not hold if the classicalness does not occur.
sent1: that both the snuffling migrator and the knockout occurs does not hold if the Monopoly does not occur. sent2: that not the unofficialness but the enjoying frustration occurs does not hold. sent3: if the metabolicness does not occur that the overexploitation does not occur but the acclaiming occurs is false. sent4: that not the overexploitation but the Germanness happens is incorrect if the mirage does not occur. sent5: the fact that the subsurfaceness does not occur is true. sent6: if the reorientation does not occur the fact that the dramaticsness does not occur and the insulation occurs is not right. sent7: that that the initiating does not occur prevents the snuffling plop is right. sent8: the coaching does not occur. sent9: if that the classical does not occur is not wrong the snuffling migrator does not occur and the knockout happens. sent10: the fact that the sinistralness does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: if the classical does not occur the coaching does not occur and the Monopoly does not occur. sent12: if the Monopoly does not occur that not the snuffling migrator but the knockout occurs is not right. sent13: the testaceousness does not occur. sent14: that the beating Carum does not occur but the centroidalness occurs is triggered by that the chancing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the classicalness does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the coach does not occur and the Monopoly does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the Monopoly does not occur.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the snuffling migrator does not occur and the knockout occurs is right does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the snuffling migrator does not occur but the knockout happens does not hold if the classicalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the snuffling migrator and the knockout occurs does not hold if the Monopoly does not occur. sent2: that not the unofficialness but the enjoying frustration occurs does not hold. sent3: if the metabolicness does not occur that the overexploitation does not occur but the acclaiming occurs is false. sent4: that not the overexploitation but the Germanness happens is incorrect if the mirage does not occur. sent5: the fact that the subsurfaceness does not occur is true. sent6: if the reorientation does not occur the fact that the dramaticsness does not occur and the insulation occurs is not right. sent7: that that the initiating does not occur prevents the snuffling plop is right. sent8: the coaching does not occur. sent9: if that the classical does not occur is not wrong the snuffling migrator does not occur and the knockout happens. sent10: the fact that the sinistralness does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: if the classical does not occur the coaching does not occur and the Monopoly does not occur. sent12: if the Monopoly does not occur that not the snuffling migrator but the knockout occurs is not right. sent13: the testaceousness does not occur. sent14: that the beating Carum does not occur but the centroidalness occurs is triggered by that the chancing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the classicalness does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the coach does not occur and the Monopoly does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the Monopoly does not occur.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the snuffling migrator does not occur and the knockout occurs is right does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__