the buckwheat does not relocate.
sent1: something is a momentum if it is runic. sent2: if the fact that something overclouds is not false then it is monetary. sent3: the fact that that the gig is a drunkenness and not penal is not wrong is incorrect. sent4: that the gig is a kind of a horsepower is true. sent5: the barbiturate does not relocate. sent6: if something that is not stale is not a bentwood then that it is not penal is not false. sent7: the gig is runic if that it is circadian thing that is not unseductive is not right. sent8: that the gig is lucky hold. sent9: if the fact that something is a kind of circadian thing that is not unseductive is correct the howdah does neglect Abecedarian. sent10: the gig does bleep. sent11: the buckwheat does not relocate if the howdah is not stale but it is penal. sent12: the gig is cowardly. sent13: the gig does not neglect Abecedarian and is runic if it is penal. sent14: if the howdah is a momentum then the gig does relocate. sent15: the buckwheat does bleep. sent16: something that is a bentwood and bleeps is not a momentum. sent17: the gig relocates if that it is unseductive and it is not penal is wrong. sent18: the gig is a kind of a bentwood. sent19: the distributor is a mandolin and it relocates. sent20: if something that is penal is not circadian the howdah bleeps. sent21: if the howdah stales and it is penal the buckwheat does not relocate. sent22: something stales if it relocates. sent23: something is not stale but it is penal if it does neglect Abecedarian. sent24: if something is non-runic it is a kind of a momentum and/or it does relocate. sent25: the fact that the howdah is not opportune hold. sent26: the sacrificer is a bentwood. sent27: that the howdah is unseductive is not wrong if something is a kind of stale thing that is not penal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gig is circadian but it is not unseductive is wrong.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the gig is runic.; sent1 -> int2: the gig is a momentum if it is runic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the gig is a kind of a momentum is right.; sent16 -> int4: if the gig is a bentwood and bleeps then it is not a momentum.; sent18 & sent10 -> int5: the gig is a bentwood and it bleeps.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gig is not a momentum.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the gig is a kind of circadian thing that is not unseductive.; int8 -> int9: something is circadian but it is not unseductive.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: that the howdah does neglect Abecedarian is right.; sent23 -> int11: if the howdah neglects Abecedarian it does not stale and is penal.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the howdah does not stale but it is penal.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the buckwheat relocates.
sent24 -> int13: if the howdah is not runic it either is a momentum or relocates or both.; sent6 -> int14: if the howdah does not stale and it is not a bentwood then it is not penal.;
$hypothesis$ = the buckwheat does not relocate. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a momentum if it is runic. sent2: if the fact that something overclouds is not false then it is monetary. sent3: the fact that that the gig is a drunkenness and not penal is not wrong is incorrect. sent4: that the gig is a kind of a horsepower is true. sent5: the barbiturate does not relocate. sent6: if something that is not stale is not a bentwood then that it is not penal is not false. sent7: the gig is runic if that it is circadian thing that is not unseductive is not right. sent8: that the gig is lucky hold. sent9: if the fact that something is a kind of circadian thing that is not unseductive is correct the howdah does neglect Abecedarian. sent10: the gig does bleep. sent11: the buckwheat does not relocate if the howdah is not stale but it is penal. sent12: the gig is cowardly. sent13: the gig does not neglect Abecedarian and is runic if it is penal. sent14: if the howdah is a momentum then the gig does relocate. sent15: the buckwheat does bleep. sent16: something that is a bentwood and bleeps is not a momentum. sent17: the gig relocates if that it is unseductive and it is not penal is wrong. sent18: the gig is a kind of a bentwood. sent19: the distributor is a mandolin and it relocates. sent20: if something that is penal is not circadian the howdah bleeps. sent21: if the howdah stales and it is penal the buckwheat does not relocate. sent22: something stales if it relocates. sent23: something is not stale but it is penal if it does neglect Abecedarian. sent24: if something is non-runic it is a kind of a momentum and/or it does relocate. sent25: the fact that the howdah is not opportune hold. sent26: the sacrificer is a bentwood. sent27: that the howdah is unseductive is not wrong if something is a kind of stale thing that is not penal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gig is circadian but it is not unseductive is wrong.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the gig is runic.; sent1 -> int2: the gig is a momentum if it is runic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the gig is a kind of a momentum is right.; sent16 -> int4: if the gig is a bentwood and bleeps then it is not a momentum.; sent18 & sent10 -> int5: the gig is a bentwood and it bleeps.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gig is not a momentum.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the gig is a kind of circadian thing that is not unseductive.; int8 -> int9: something is circadian but it is not unseductive.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: that the howdah does neglect Abecedarian is right.; sent23 -> int11: if the howdah neglects Abecedarian it does not stale and is penal.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the howdah does not stale but it is penal.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__