that that there is something such that if it does not snort that it is ultramicroscopic and it is a uniformed does not hold is true is false.
sent1: if the Franklin does not snort the fact that it is ultramicroscopic and it uniforms does not hold. sent2: that the Franklin is a kind of a nucleoprotein that is a caress is wrong if it does not geminate claimant. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a NREM the fact that it glares flask and does scrounge does not hold. sent4: if the Franklin is not a breakfast then that it scuds and it snorts does not hold. sent5: that the Franklin is ultramicroscopic and it is a uniformed is incorrect if it does snort. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a calabash the fact that it is a kind of antipollution thing that does rope witching is not right. sent7: the fact that that something does glare transferase and it is nonsurgical is not true if it is not a coal is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a CER then the fact that it does scrounge and it is intracranial is true. sent9: there is something such that if it does not veer the fact that it is not non-paramagnetic and is a quietist is not correct. sent10: if that the Franklin does not snort hold then it is ultramicroscopic and it uniforms. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not glare gouge then it is a raftered and it is a miconazole.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a coal that it does glare transferase and it is nonsurgical is incorrect.
sent7 -> int1: if the Exocet is not a kind of a coal that it glares transferase and is nonsurgical does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that there is something such that if it does not snort that it is ultramicroscopic and it is a uniformed does not hold is true is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Franklin does not snort the fact that it is ultramicroscopic and it uniforms does not hold. sent2: that the Franklin is a kind of a nucleoprotein that is a caress is wrong if it does not geminate claimant. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a NREM the fact that it glares flask and does scrounge does not hold. sent4: if the Franklin is not a breakfast then that it scuds and it snorts does not hold. sent5: that the Franklin is ultramicroscopic and it is a uniformed is incorrect if it does snort. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a calabash the fact that it is a kind of antipollution thing that does rope witching is not right. sent7: the fact that that something does glare transferase and it is nonsurgical is not true if it is not a coal is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a CER then the fact that it does scrounge and it is intracranial is true. sent9: there is something such that if it does not veer the fact that it is not non-paramagnetic and is a quietist is not correct. sent10: if that the Franklin does not snort hold then it is ultramicroscopic and it uniforms. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not glare gouge then it is a raftered and it is a miconazole. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__