the fact that the guy is neurotropic is correct.
sent1: something that does lean hair is not a defiance. sent2: the galbanum does not symbolize. sent3: the Meccano is not Chadian. sent4: something is not neurotropic if it is loamy. sent5: if either something is loamy or it symbolizes or both it is not neurotropic. sent6: that the guy is not non-neurotropic is not wrong if the bailee is non-neurotropic. sent7: the guy does symbolize. sent8: if the guy is a stagehand then it does not symbolize. sent9: if either something is a Tartary or it does lean flooding or both it is not a kind of a glint. sent10: that the guy is not neurotropic is not false if it is loamy.
sent7 -> int1: the guy is loamy and/or symbolizes.; sent5 -> int2: if the guy is loamy or it does symbolize or both then it is not neurotropic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the guy is neurotropic.
sent3 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a Chadian.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the guy is neurotropic is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does lean hair is not a defiance. sent2: the galbanum does not symbolize. sent3: the Meccano is not Chadian. sent4: something is not neurotropic if it is loamy. sent5: if either something is loamy or it symbolizes or both it is not neurotropic. sent6: that the guy is not non-neurotropic is not wrong if the bailee is non-neurotropic. sent7: the guy does symbolize. sent8: if the guy is a stagehand then it does not symbolize. sent9: if either something is a Tartary or it does lean flooding or both it is not a kind of a glint. sent10: that the guy is not neurotropic is not false if it is loamy. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the guy is loamy and/or symbolizes.; sent5 -> int2: if the guy is loamy or it does symbolize or both then it is not neurotropic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__