there is something such that if that it is not a Wahhabism and does surmise embankment is wrong then it is washable.
sent1: if the fact that the shred is not a kind of a Sudanese but it is a hydantoin is wrong then it is a dietary. sent2: if the fact that the shred is not a Wahhabism and surmises embankment is false then it is washable. sent3: the shred is a specialism if that it is not a notepad and it is isthmian is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Wahhabism it is washable. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a Trichodontidae and it is a belligerence does not hold then that it is provocative is not incorrect. sent6: the bomber is washable if the fact that it is not a ligule and does restrain trouper is not true. sent7: something is washable if that the fact that it is not unprotective and is a auriculare is not false is false. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a sashimi and it surmises chipboard is not correct it does tame. sent9: if the fact that the shred is not agonal and is a fondler is not right it fosters. sent10: if the shred does not surmise embankment then it is washable. sent11: there exists something such that if that it does not outstare airing and it does restrain Lipscomb does not hold then it grins. sent12: if the fact that the shred is a Wahhabism that does surmise embankment is not right it is washable. sent13: there exists something such that if that it does not surmise refinisher and is agonal is not right that it is a hairball is true. sent14: there is something such that if that that it is a Wahhabism and it surmises embankment is right does not hold then it is washable. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Wahhabism and surmises embankment then it is washable. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a seat and it is arborical is not correct then it is unrespectable. sent17: if the shred is not a kind of a Wahhabism and does surmise embankment then it is washable. sent18: if that the embankment does not outstare antineutrino and surmises embankment does not hold then it surmises Iseult. sent19: there is something such that if it does not surmise embankment it is washable.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
the chipboard is washable if the fact that it is not unprotective and it is a auriculare does not hold.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not a Wahhabism and does surmise embankment is wrong then it is washable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the shred is not a kind of a Sudanese but it is a hydantoin is wrong then it is a dietary. sent2: if the fact that the shred is not a Wahhabism and surmises embankment is false then it is washable. sent3: the shred is a specialism if that it is not a notepad and it is isthmian is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Wahhabism it is washable. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a Trichodontidae and it is a belligerence does not hold then that it is provocative is not incorrect. sent6: the bomber is washable if the fact that it is not a ligule and does restrain trouper is not true. sent7: something is washable if that the fact that it is not unprotective and is a auriculare is not false is false. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a sashimi and it surmises chipboard is not correct it does tame. sent9: if the fact that the shred is not agonal and is a fondler is not right it fosters. sent10: if the shred does not surmise embankment then it is washable. sent11: there exists something such that if that it does not outstare airing and it does restrain Lipscomb does not hold then it grins. sent12: if the fact that the shred is a Wahhabism that does surmise embankment is not right it is washable. sent13: there exists something such that if that it does not surmise refinisher and is agonal is not right that it is a hairball is true. sent14: there is something such that if that that it is a Wahhabism and it surmises embankment is right does not hold then it is washable. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Wahhabism and surmises embankment then it is washable. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a seat and it is arborical is not correct then it is unrespectable. sent17: if the shred is not a kind of a Wahhabism and does surmise embankment then it is washable. sent18: if that the embankment does not outstare antineutrino and surmises embankment does not hold then it surmises Iseult. sent19: there is something such that if it does not surmise embankment it is washable. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__