the stranding umbilical does not occur.
sent1: the stranding umbilical occurs and the indiscreetness happens if the fact that the bilking does not occur hold. sent2: if that the simplifying occurs but the subtilizing anthropology does not occur does not hold the simplifying does not occur. sent3: that the stranding umbilical does not occur causes that that the lobularness does not occur and the cornhusking does not occur hold. sent4: the Gaboneseness occurs. sent5: the bilking occurs. sent6: that the subtilizing Scythia does not occur and the subtilizing coronation occurs is incorrect if the arrival does not occur. sent7: the runicness does not occur and the formation does not occur. sent8: the fact that the bilking but not the subtilizing salpinx happens is not true if that the stranding Wavell does not occur is not wrong. sent9: if the mapping happens the fact that the simplifying but not the subtilizing anthropology occurs is incorrect. sent10: that the simplifying does not occur yields that the C-section does not occur but the caress occurs. sent11: if the fact that the throning does not occur but the ludo occurs does not hold then the arrival does not occur. sent12: the stranding Wavell does not occur if that not the subtilizing Scythia but the subtilizing coronation happens is not true. sent13: if the rappel does not occur both the mapping and the narcoleptic occurs. sent14: that the stranding Wavell does not occur and the subtilizing Scythia does not occur is brought about by that the subtilizing coronation does not occur. sent15: the stranding Wavell occurs. sent16: that the subtilizing salpinx does not occur but the bilking happens causes the lobularness. sent17: that the subtilizing salpinx occurs hold if the stranding Wavell does not occur and the subtilizing Scythia does not occur. sent18: if the C-section does not occur that not the throning but the ludo happens is wrong. sent19: not the subtilizing salpinx but the bilking occurs if the stranding Wavell occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stranding umbilical does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the lobularness does not occur and the cornhusking does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the lobularness does not occur.; sent19 & sent15 -> int3: not the subtilizing salpinx but the bilking occurs.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the lobularness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the indiscreetness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the stranding umbilical does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the stranding umbilical occurs and the indiscreetness happens if the fact that the bilking does not occur hold. sent2: if that the simplifying occurs but the subtilizing anthropology does not occur does not hold the simplifying does not occur. sent3: that the stranding umbilical does not occur causes that that the lobularness does not occur and the cornhusking does not occur hold. sent4: the Gaboneseness occurs. sent5: the bilking occurs. sent6: that the subtilizing Scythia does not occur and the subtilizing coronation occurs is incorrect if the arrival does not occur. sent7: the runicness does not occur and the formation does not occur. sent8: the fact that the bilking but not the subtilizing salpinx happens is not true if that the stranding Wavell does not occur is not wrong. sent9: if the mapping happens the fact that the simplifying but not the subtilizing anthropology occurs is incorrect. sent10: that the simplifying does not occur yields that the C-section does not occur but the caress occurs. sent11: if the fact that the throning does not occur but the ludo occurs does not hold then the arrival does not occur. sent12: the stranding Wavell does not occur if that not the subtilizing Scythia but the subtilizing coronation happens is not true. sent13: if the rappel does not occur both the mapping and the narcoleptic occurs. sent14: that the stranding Wavell does not occur and the subtilizing Scythia does not occur is brought about by that the subtilizing coronation does not occur. sent15: the stranding Wavell occurs. sent16: that the subtilizing salpinx does not occur but the bilking happens causes the lobularness. sent17: that the subtilizing salpinx occurs hold if the stranding Wavell does not occur and the subtilizing Scythia does not occur. sent18: if the C-section does not occur that not the throning but the ludo happens is wrong. sent19: not the subtilizing salpinx but the bilking occurs if the stranding Wavell occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stranding umbilical does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the lobularness does not occur and the cornhusking does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the lobularness does not occur.; sent19 & sent15 -> int3: not the subtilizing salpinx but the bilking occurs.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the lobularness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__