the ewe is non-contrapuntal thing that urticates Myopus.
sent1: if something is megakaryocytic then it does urticate diflunisal. sent2: the postmistress is not non-contrapuntal. sent3: the fact that the gynophore is smoky is not false if it is immunosuppressive. sent4: if the postmistress does not urticate Myopus then the fact that the ewe is not contrapuntal and urticate Myopus is wrong. sent5: if something jars pin-up then that it tries is true. sent6: the gynophore is not a Chaetodipterus if the cleats is faecal. sent7: the postmistress does not urticate Myopus if the gynophore is smoky or faecal or both. sent8: the cleats urticates Canaanite and is a Chaetodipterus. sent9: if the fact that something is not pubic and is non-immunosuppressive is wrong it is smoky. sent10: that the gynophore is not pubic and not immunosuppressive is not correct if the cleats is pubic. sent11: something is not contrapuntal but it urticates Myopus if it does not urticate Canaanite. sent12: if something urticates Canaanite it is pubic. sent13: if the gynophore is smoky then the fact that the ewe is smoky and is not contrapuntal does not hold. sent14: the fact that the gynophore is not pubic and not non-immunosuppressive is not right.
sent8 -> int1: the cleats does urticate Canaanite.; sent12 -> int2: the cleats is pubic if it does urticate Canaanite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cleats is pubic.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the gynophore is not pubic and not immunosuppressive is not right.; sent9 -> int5: if the fact that the gynophore is not pubic and it is not immunosuppressive is not right it is smoky.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gynophore is smoky.; int6 -> int7: the gynophore is smoky and/or faecal.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the postmistress does not urticate Myopus.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the ewe is non-contrapuntal thing that urticates Myopus.
sent11 -> int9: if the fact that the ewe does not urticate Canaanite hold then it is not contrapuntal and it does urticate Myopus.;
$hypothesis$ = the ewe is non-contrapuntal thing that urticates Myopus. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is megakaryocytic then it does urticate diflunisal. sent2: the postmistress is not non-contrapuntal. sent3: the fact that the gynophore is smoky is not false if it is immunosuppressive. sent4: if the postmistress does not urticate Myopus then the fact that the ewe is not contrapuntal and urticate Myopus is wrong. sent5: if something jars pin-up then that it tries is true. sent6: the gynophore is not a Chaetodipterus if the cleats is faecal. sent7: the postmistress does not urticate Myopus if the gynophore is smoky or faecal or both. sent8: the cleats urticates Canaanite and is a Chaetodipterus. sent9: if the fact that something is not pubic and is non-immunosuppressive is wrong it is smoky. sent10: that the gynophore is not pubic and not immunosuppressive is not correct if the cleats is pubic. sent11: something is not contrapuntal but it urticates Myopus if it does not urticate Canaanite. sent12: if something urticates Canaanite it is pubic. sent13: if the gynophore is smoky then the fact that the ewe is smoky and is not contrapuntal does not hold. sent14: the fact that the gynophore is not pubic and not non-immunosuppressive is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the cleats does urticate Canaanite.; sent12 -> int2: the cleats is pubic if it does urticate Canaanite.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cleats is pubic.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: that the gynophore is not pubic and not immunosuppressive is not right.; sent9 -> int5: if the fact that the gynophore is not pubic and it is not immunosuppressive is not right it is smoky.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gynophore is smoky.; int6 -> int7: the gynophore is smoky and/or faecal.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the postmistress does not urticate Myopus.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__