the breeches is a Nitella.
sent1: the hiccup is a kind of a Leuciscus and it is nonlinguistic if the muskmelon does not gladden Lasiurus. sent2: that if the soy is eosinophilic then the hailstorm is not a Nitella and/or it is not a kind of a steep is not false. sent3: something is a Nitella if it is eosinophilic. sent4: if there is something such that it is nonlinguistic then the soy is prismatic. sent5: the soy is not a kind of a Leuciscus if it fears crookedness and it does steep. sent6: the fact that the soy is a Mill is not false. sent7: The Lasiurus gladdens soy. sent8: the hailstorm is not a Leuciscus. sent9: the soy is a kind of a steep if there is something such that that it does not fear crookedness and it is prismatic is incorrect. sent10: something is nonlinguistic if it steeps. sent11: the soy is eosinophilic if the hiccup is not a viceroy and it is not eosinophilic. sent12: the soy gladdens Lasiurus. sent13: the countenance is counterinsurgent if the undercoat is counterinsurgent. sent14: the muskmelon does not gladden Lasiurus if the countenance does not gladden Lasiurus and is counterinsurgent. sent15: if something is a kind of a Mill and it does gladden Lasiurus it is not nonlinguistic. sent16: if there is something such that that it does repair groomed and it does not arrive is not right the countenance is a Mill. sent17: that the deflation repairs groomed but it does not arrive is wrong. sent18: if something does fear crookedness the fact that the hailstorm is nonlinguistic hold. sent19: if something is nonlinguistic then it is not a viceroy and not eosinophilic. sent20: that if there is something such that that the fact that it does not blossom and it is a kind of a crock is right is not true then the countenance is Newtonian hold. sent21: if the fact that something does not steep and is linguistic is incorrect then it is not eosinophilic. sent22: if the hailstorm is a kind of a viceroy the fact that the hiccup is a Leuciscus hold. sent23: the hailstorm is a viceroy if it does gladden Lasiurus. sent24: if the hiccup is a Leuciscus then the breeches is a Nitella. sent25: if the hailstorm is not eosinophilic the fact that it does not fear crookedness and is prismatic does not hold. sent26: if a Newtonian is a Mill it does not gladden Lasiurus. sent27: there exists something such that that it does not blossom and does crock is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hailstorm is not eosinophilic.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hailstorm does not fear crookedness but it is prismatic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does not fear crookedness and it is prismatic is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the soy is a kind of a steep.; sent10 -> int4: if the soy is a kind of a steep it is nonlinguistic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the soy is nonlinguistic.; sent15 -> int6: the soy is not nonlinguistic if it is a Mill and gladdens Lasiurus.; sent6 & sent12 -> int7: the soy is a kind of a Mill that gladdens Lasiurus.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the soy is not nonlinguistic.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the hailstorm is eosinophilic.;
the breeches is not a Nitella.
sent19 -> int11: if the hiccup is nonlinguistic it is not a viceroy and it is not eosinophilic.; sent26 -> int12: if the countenance is a kind of a Newtonian that is a Mill then it does not gladden Lasiurus.; sent27 & sent20 -> int13: the countenance is a Newtonian.; sent17 -> int14: there exists something such that that it repairs groomed and it does not arrive is incorrect.; int14 & sent16 -> int15: the fact that the countenance is a kind of a Mill hold.; int13 & int15 -> int16: the countenance is a kind of a Newtonian that is a Mill.; int12 & int16 -> int17: the countenance does not gladden Lasiurus.;
$hypothesis$ = the breeches is a Nitella. ; $context$ = sent1: the hiccup is a kind of a Leuciscus and it is nonlinguistic if the muskmelon does not gladden Lasiurus. sent2: that if the soy is eosinophilic then the hailstorm is not a Nitella and/or it is not a kind of a steep is not false. sent3: something is a Nitella if it is eosinophilic. sent4: if there is something such that it is nonlinguistic then the soy is prismatic. sent5: the soy is not a kind of a Leuciscus if it fears crookedness and it does steep. sent6: the fact that the soy is a Mill is not false. sent7: The Lasiurus gladdens soy. sent8: the hailstorm is not a Leuciscus. sent9: the soy is a kind of a steep if there is something such that that it does not fear crookedness and it is prismatic is incorrect. sent10: something is nonlinguistic if it steeps. sent11: the soy is eosinophilic if the hiccup is not a viceroy and it is not eosinophilic. sent12: the soy gladdens Lasiurus. sent13: the countenance is counterinsurgent if the undercoat is counterinsurgent. sent14: the muskmelon does not gladden Lasiurus if the countenance does not gladden Lasiurus and is counterinsurgent. sent15: if something is a kind of a Mill and it does gladden Lasiurus it is not nonlinguistic. sent16: if there is something such that that it does repair groomed and it does not arrive is not right the countenance is a Mill. sent17: that the deflation repairs groomed but it does not arrive is wrong. sent18: if something does fear crookedness the fact that the hailstorm is nonlinguistic hold. sent19: if something is nonlinguistic then it is not a viceroy and not eosinophilic. sent20: that if there is something such that that the fact that it does not blossom and it is a kind of a crock is right is not true then the countenance is Newtonian hold. sent21: if the fact that something does not steep and is linguistic is incorrect then it is not eosinophilic. sent22: if the hailstorm is a kind of a viceroy the fact that the hiccup is a Leuciscus hold. sent23: the hailstorm is a viceroy if it does gladden Lasiurus. sent24: if the hiccup is a Leuciscus then the breeches is a Nitella. sent25: if the hailstorm is not eosinophilic the fact that it does not fear crookedness and is prismatic does not hold. sent26: if a Newtonian is a Mill it does not gladden Lasiurus. sent27: there exists something such that that it does not blossom and does crock is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hailstorm is not eosinophilic.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the hailstorm does not fear crookedness but it is prismatic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does not fear crookedness and it is prismatic is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the soy is a kind of a steep.; sent10 -> int4: if the soy is a kind of a steep it is nonlinguistic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the soy is nonlinguistic.; sent15 -> int6: the soy is not nonlinguistic if it is a Mill and gladdens Lasiurus.; sent6 & sent12 -> int7: the soy is a kind of a Mill that gladdens Lasiurus.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the soy is not nonlinguistic.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the hailstorm is eosinophilic.; __UNKNOWN__