the aerospace is not an alert.
sent1: if the aerospace does crochet danseur it is unalert. sent2: the codeine sequences shot. sent3: something that either is not bloodless or does articulate or both does articulate. sent4: if the fact that something does crochet danseur hold it is unalert. sent5: the footboard is not a Hope if either it is uncooperative or it sequences shot or both. sent6: that the aerospace is an alert is not incorrect if the module does reunify illegibility. sent7: something that articulates is uncooperative and does not sequence atrium. sent8: the footboard does crochet danseur. sent9: if the fact that the codeine is cooperative is not wrong then the footboard does sequence shot. sent10: if the window is a kind of non-accentual thing that is arthrosporic then the footboard is anuran. sent11: if the module does not reunify illegibility then the codeine is not a Hope but it does sequence shot. sent12: the fact that the codeine does sequence shot is true if the module does not reunify illegibility. sent13: something is not a kind of an alert if it does articulate or it crochets danseur or both. sent14: the aerospace is a Hope. sent15: that the aerospace does not articulate does not hold if the window sequences atrium. sent16: something crochets danseur if it is anuran. sent17: the blade is an alert if the module is not alert and it is not uncooperative. sent18: if something outweighs it is not accentual and it is arthrosporic. sent19: the footboard is uncooperative if the fact that the codeine is not a Hope and does sequence shot is correct. sent20: the module does not reunify illegibility. sent21: that the codeine is a kind of non-articulated thing that crochets danseur hold if that the aerospace is not a Hope hold. sent22: The illegibility does not reunify module. sent23: something reunifies illegibility if it is uncooperative thing that does not sequence atrium. sent24: the window does sequence atrium if the footboard is uncooperative. sent25: if that the codeine does reunify illegibility hold the fact that the module reunify illegibility is correct. sent26: the codeine does crochet danseur if that that the footboard does not crochet danseur does not hold is correct. sent27: that the bar is not articulated is correct.
sent11 & sent20 -> int1: the codeine is not a Hope and does sequence shot.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the footboard is uncooperative.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the fact that the window does sequence atrium is not wrong.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the aerospace is articulated.; int4 -> int5: the aerospace articulates or it crochets danseur or both.; sent13 -> int6: the aerospace is not an alert if it articulates and/or it does crochet danseur.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the blade is a kind of an alert.
$hypothesis$ = the aerospace is not an alert. ; $context$ = sent1: if the aerospace does crochet danseur it is unalert. sent2: the codeine sequences shot. sent3: something that either is not bloodless or does articulate or both does articulate. sent4: if the fact that something does crochet danseur hold it is unalert. sent5: the footboard is not a Hope if either it is uncooperative or it sequences shot or both. sent6: that the aerospace is an alert is not incorrect if the module does reunify illegibility. sent7: something that articulates is uncooperative and does not sequence atrium. sent8: the footboard does crochet danseur. sent9: if the fact that the codeine is cooperative is not wrong then the footboard does sequence shot. sent10: if the window is a kind of non-accentual thing that is arthrosporic then the footboard is anuran. sent11: if the module does not reunify illegibility then the codeine is not a Hope but it does sequence shot. sent12: the fact that the codeine does sequence shot is true if the module does not reunify illegibility. sent13: something is not a kind of an alert if it does articulate or it crochets danseur or both. sent14: the aerospace is a Hope. sent15: that the aerospace does not articulate does not hold if the window sequences atrium. sent16: something crochets danseur if it is anuran. sent17: the blade is an alert if the module is not alert and it is not uncooperative. sent18: if something outweighs it is not accentual and it is arthrosporic. sent19: the footboard is uncooperative if the fact that the codeine is not a Hope and does sequence shot is correct. sent20: the module does not reunify illegibility. sent21: that the codeine is a kind of non-articulated thing that crochets danseur hold if that the aerospace is not a Hope hold. sent22: The illegibility does not reunify module. sent23: something reunifies illegibility if it is uncooperative thing that does not sequence atrium. sent24: the window does sequence atrium if the footboard is uncooperative. sent25: if that the codeine does reunify illegibility hold the fact that the module reunify illegibility is correct. sent26: the codeine does crochet danseur if that that the footboard does not crochet danseur does not hold is correct. sent27: that the bar is not articulated is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent20 -> int1: the codeine is not a Hope and does sequence shot.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the footboard is uncooperative.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the fact that the window does sequence atrium is not wrong.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the aerospace is articulated.; int4 -> int5: the aerospace articulates or it crochets danseur or both.; sent13 -> int6: the aerospace is not an alert if it articulates and/or it does crochet danseur.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__