that the harpy is not a kind of a configurationism hold.
sent1: something is not a configurationism but it rambles libration if it does guess. sent2: if something is not a jazzman then that it is carangid but not a cichlid is not correct. sent3: the leatherback is not a kind of a configurationism. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a guess or it is nonmodern or both the harpy is not a guess. sent5: the harpy is not peaty. sent6: the fact that the uxoricide does not axe rigged and commiserates jack-in-the-pulpit is wrong. sent7: something is a guess if it is nonmodern. sent8: if the neuropil is a kind of a cichlid then that the registrar is nonmodern hold. sent9: that the harpy does not ramble libration but it is a kind of a guess is not true if the registrar is not nonmodern. sent10: the harpy does not ramble libration. sent11: the fact that the label does not ramble libration hold if the fact that it is a kind of a guess and is not nonmodern does not hold. sent12: if something rambles libration then it is not a Simulium and it is not a delighted. sent13: that if the uxoricide does not commiserate jack-in-the-pulpit the fact that the neuropil is a kind of a jazzman and does ramble calceus is not true is not false. sent14: The libration does not ramble harpy. sent15: if the fact that that the registrar is a carangid and it is a kind of a guess is true is not right it is not a guess. sent16: the uxoricide does not commiserate jack-in-the-pulpit if that it does not axe rigged and it commiserate jack-in-the-pulpit is false. sent17: the fact that the harpy does not ramble libration and it is not a configurationism is false. sent18: if the registrar is not a configurationism and rambles libration then the harpy is not a kind of a configurationism. sent19: the neuropil is a cichlid if that it is not non-carangid and not a cichlid is wrong. sent20: that something is a carangid and it is a kind of a guess is false if it is not a cichlid. sent21: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a jazzman and does ramble calceus is not correct then the registrar is not a kind of a cichlid.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the harpy is not a kind of a configurationism.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the harpy does not ramble libration and is not a configurationism.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the harpy is both not a Simulium and not a delighted.
sent12 -> int3: if the harpy rambles libration it is not a kind of a Simulium and it is not a delighted.; sent20 -> int4: if the registrar is not a cichlid then the fact that it is a kind of a carangid and guesses is incorrect.; sent16 & sent6 -> int5: the uxoricide does not commiserate jack-in-the-pulpit.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: that the neuropil is a jazzman and rambles calceus is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a jazzman that rambles calceus is not true.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the registrar is not a kind of a cichlid.; int4 & int8 -> int9: that the registrar is both carangid and a guess does not hold.; sent15 & int9 -> int10: the registrar is not a guess.; int10 -> int11: the registrar either is not a kind of a guess or is nonmodern or both.; int11 -> int12: either something is not a guess or it is nonmodern or both.; int12 & sent4 -> int13: the harpy does not guess.;
$hypothesis$ = that the harpy is not a kind of a configurationism hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a configurationism but it rambles libration if it does guess. sent2: if something is not a jazzman then that it is carangid but not a cichlid is not correct. sent3: the leatherback is not a kind of a configurationism. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a guess or it is nonmodern or both the harpy is not a guess. sent5: the harpy is not peaty. sent6: the fact that the uxoricide does not axe rigged and commiserates jack-in-the-pulpit is wrong. sent7: something is a guess if it is nonmodern. sent8: if the neuropil is a kind of a cichlid then that the registrar is nonmodern hold. sent9: that the harpy does not ramble libration but it is a kind of a guess is not true if the registrar is not nonmodern. sent10: the harpy does not ramble libration. sent11: the fact that the label does not ramble libration hold if the fact that it is a kind of a guess and is not nonmodern does not hold. sent12: if something rambles libration then it is not a Simulium and it is not a delighted. sent13: that if the uxoricide does not commiserate jack-in-the-pulpit the fact that the neuropil is a kind of a jazzman and does ramble calceus is not true is not false. sent14: The libration does not ramble harpy. sent15: if the fact that that the registrar is a carangid and it is a kind of a guess is true is not right it is not a guess. sent16: the uxoricide does not commiserate jack-in-the-pulpit if that it does not axe rigged and it commiserate jack-in-the-pulpit is false. sent17: the fact that the harpy does not ramble libration and it is not a configurationism is false. sent18: if the registrar is not a configurationism and rambles libration then the harpy is not a kind of a configurationism. sent19: the neuropil is a cichlid if that it is not non-carangid and not a cichlid is wrong. sent20: that something is a carangid and it is a kind of a guess is false if it is not a cichlid. sent21: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a jazzman and does ramble calceus is not correct then the registrar is not a kind of a cichlid. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the harpy is not a kind of a configurationism.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the harpy does not ramble libration and is not a configurationism.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__