the yellowbird is not a weatherliness.
sent1: if something is not an icing and it is not explicable it does isolate. sent2: that the vegetable does not isolate is not incorrect if it is a Bolivian. sent3: if the fact that the vegetable is not a Oken and does not scour jackfruit does not hold it is non-Bolivian. sent4: if the vegetable is not explicable then the pituitary is lumbosacral and an icing. sent5: if the yellowbird is a kind of a pickaninny then it does quintuple stressor. sent6: something is a weatherliness if it is explicable. sent7: if the pituitary is an icing then it is lumbosacral. sent8: there exists something such that that it does scour jackfruit is right. sent9: the pituitary is not explicable. sent10: if something is a Bolivian then it scours jackfruit. sent11: if that the pituitary does scour jackfruit is not wrong then the yellowbird is a weatherliness. sent12: the pituitary is a kind of a Bolivian if that it isolates hold. sent13: the bumper is not a weatherliness. sent14: the yellowbird is not a kind of an icing if something is explicable thing that is lumbosacral. sent15: the jackfruit is a weatherliness. sent16: the pituitary is non-lumbosacral. sent17: the Angora scours jackfruit if it is a kind of a indiction. sent18: that the vegetable scours jackfruit but it is not a kind of a Bolivian is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a weatherliness. sent19: the vegetable is a kind of a Bolivian if that it is Bolivian thing that scours jackfruit does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the pituitary does ice is not false.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the pituitary is lumbosacral.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pituitary does not ice.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the pituitary is both not an icing and not explicable.; sent1 -> int5: if the pituitary is not a kind of an icing and is not explicable it isolates.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pituitary isolates.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the pituitary is Bolivian.; sent10 -> int8: if the pituitary is Bolivian it does scour jackfruit.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the pituitary scours jackfruit.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the yellowbird does not ice.
sent13 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a weatherliness.; int10 & sent18 -> int11: the vegetable scours jackfruit but it is not a kind of a Bolivian.; int11 -> int12: something scours jackfruit and is not Bolivian.;
$hypothesis$ = the yellowbird is not a weatherliness. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not an icing and it is not explicable it does isolate. sent2: that the vegetable does not isolate is not incorrect if it is a Bolivian. sent3: if the fact that the vegetable is not a Oken and does not scour jackfruit does not hold it is non-Bolivian. sent4: if the vegetable is not explicable then the pituitary is lumbosacral and an icing. sent5: if the yellowbird is a kind of a pickaninny then it does quintuple stressor. sent6: something is a weatherliness if it is explicable. sent7: if the pituitary is an icing then it is lumbosacral. sent8: there exists something such that that it does scour jackfruit is right. sent9: the pituitary is not explicable. sent10: if something is a Bolivian then it scours jackfruit. sent11: if that the pituitary does scour jackfruit is not wrong then the yellowbird is a weatherliness. sent12: the pituitary is a kind of a Bolivian if that it isolates hold. sent13: the bumper is not a weatherliness. sent14: the yellowbird is not a kind of an icing if something is explicable thing that is lumbosacral. sent15: the jackfruit is a weatherliness. sent16: the pituitary is non-lumbosacral. sent17: the Angora scours jackfruit if it is a kind of a indiction. sent18: that the vegetable scours jackfruit but it is not a kind of a Bolivian is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a weatherliness. sent19: the vegetable is a kind of a Bolivian if that it is Bolivian thing that scours jackfruit does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the pituitary does ice is not false.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the pituitary is lumbosacral.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the pituitary does not ice.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the pituitary is both not an icing and not explicable.; sent1 -> int5: if the pituitary is not a kind of an icing and is not explicable it isolates.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pituitary isolates.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the pituitary is Bolivian.; sent10 -> int8: if the pituitary is Bolivian it does scour jackfruit.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the pituitary scours jackfruit.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__