that that the slagging awlwort does not occur but the descanting happens is caused by that the pegging Protium does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the slagging awlwort is prevented by the fattiness. sent2: the subdivision happens if the fact that the subdivision does not occur and the hatting does not occur is wrong. sent3: the fact that not the fattiness but the partying happens does not hold if the pegging Protium does not occur. sent4: if the slagging awlwort happens the fact that the keratoscopy happens and the pegging Protium does not occur is not right. sent5: the subdivision but not the feint occurs. sent6: not the slagging awlwort but the descant occurs if the pegging Protium occurs. sent7: the rooting does not occur if that the determination and the bicker occurs is wrong. sent8: the fact that both the fattiness and the partying happens is not correct. sent9: the fact that the fact that both the fattiness and the party occurs is correct does not hold if the pegging Protium does not occur. sent10: if that the rooting does not occur hold the fact that the subdivision does not occur and the hatting does not occur does not hold. sent11: the fact that both the determination and the bicker occurs does not hold if the down-bow does not occur. sent12: the keratoscopy does not occur if the fact that the keratoscopy happens but the pegging Protium does not occur is wrong. sent13: the slagging awlwort does not occur if that that not the fattiness but the partying happens is not right is not incorrect. sent14: the feinting does not occur. sent15: that that the fact that the hiking does not occur but the teratogenicness happens is correct is false is not false. sent16: that both the subdivision and the feinting occurs prevents that the descanting does not occur. sent17: if the subdivision but not the feinting occurs then the descant happens. sent18: if the glissading does not occur the fact that the insult does not occur and the pegging transept happens is incorrect. sent19: if the pegging Protium happens that both the non-fattiness and the party occurs is false. sent20: if the fact that both the Lusitanianness and the non-uvealness occurs does not hold then the down-bow does not occur. sent21: if the beat does not occur not the large-capitalizationness but the uncharacteristicness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pegging Protium does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-fattyness and the party occurs is false.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the slagging awlwort does not occur.; sent17 & sent5 -> int3: the descanting happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the slagging awlwort does not occur and the descanting occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the keratoscopy does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that that the slagging awlwort does not occur but the descanting happens is caused by that the pegging Protium does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the slagging awlwort is prevented by the fattiness. sent2: the subdivision happens if the fact that the subdivision does not occur and the hatting does not occur is wrong. sent3: the fact that not the fattiness but the partying happens does not hold if the pegging Protium does not occur. sent4: if the slagging awlwort happens the fact that the keratoscopy happens and the pegging Protium does not occur is not right. sent5: the subdivision but not the feint occurs. sent6: not the slagging awlwort but the descant occurs if the pegging Protium occurs. sent7: the rooting does not occur if that the determination and the bicker occurs is wrong. sent8: the fact that both the fattiness and the partying happens is not correct. sent9: the fact that the fact that both the fattiness and the party occurs is correct does not hold if the pegging Protium does not occur. sent10: if that the rooting does not occur hold the fact that the subdivision does not occur and the hatting does not occur does not hold. sent11: the fact that both the determination and the bicker occurs does not hold if the down-bow does not occur. sent12: the keratoscopy does not occur if the fact that the keratoscopy happens but the pegging Protium does not occur is wrong. sent13: the slagging awlwort does not occur if that that not the fattiness but the partying happens is not right is not incorrect. sent14: the feinting does not occur. sent15: that that the fact that the hiking does not occur but the teratogenicness happens is correct is false is not false. sent16: that both the subdivision and the feinting occurs prevents that the descanting does not occur. sent17: if the subdivision but not the feinting occurs then the descant happens. sent18: if the glissading does not occur the fact that the insult does not occur and the pegging transept happens is incorrect. sent19: if the pegging Protium happens that both the non-fattiness and the party occurs is false. sent20: if the fact that both the Lusitanianness and the non-uvealness occurs does not hold then the down-bow does not occur. sent21: if the beat does not occur not the large-capitalizationness but the uncharacteristicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pegging Protium does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the non-fattyness and the party occurs is false.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the slagging awlwort does not occur.; sent17 & sent5 -> int3: the descanting happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the slagging awlwort does not occur and the descanting occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__