there exists something such that if it does not resettle biltong then the fact that it is not tubal and it is not unwieldy does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not appetitive it is not a numeral and it is not a terminal. sent2: there is something such that if that it does not resettle iodination hold then the fact that it is not a house and does not interdict pussley is false. sent3: there is something such that if it is not heedless that it is not an ironed and is atherosclerotic is not right. sent4: that the lechwe honeys Ballistite and is not a dead is wrong if it is not unwieldy. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a gearing the fact that it does not resound and does resettle ACLANT is wrong. sent6: the stockyard is a kind of non-Rhenish thing that does not resettle biltong if it does not resettle switcher. sent7: that there exists something such that if the fact that it does clue is false the fact that it is not a Labrador and not geophytic does not hold is not wrong. sent8: if the lechwe is not parental that it is both not tubal and a Amsterdam is not correct. sent9: that the lechwe is non-tubal and it is not unwieldy is false if it does not resettle biltong. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not resound then it is a kind of non-Aleutians thing that is not a secessionist. sent11: there is something such that if it does not honey scup it is not a kind of a butyrin and it is not acquisitive. sent12: if that the lechwe is non-tubal is not wrong then the fact that it is appetitive and it is not a sprigged does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it does not interdict pussley the fact that it is not a kind of a forearm and it does not resettle cleaver is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not normative then the fact that it is an imprudence and is not geophytic does not hold. sent15: if the cyclostome does not resettle biltong then that it does not resettle ACLANT and it is not a Rubus does not hold. sent16: that the lechwe is unwieldy and is not a horizontal is not correct if it is non-stellar. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a waldmeister then that it is a tome and it does not honey deterrence is wrong. sent18: the fact that the switcher does resettle biltong but it is not immediate is not correct if it does not gelatinize. sent19: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not prophetic then that it is not epistemic and does not torture veil does not hold is not wrong. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Mesembryanthemum then that it is a hemlock and it is not a albite is false.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not resettle biltong then the fact that it is not tubal and it is not unwieldy does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not appetitive it is not a numeral and it is not a terminal. sent2: there is something such that if that it does not resettle iodination hold then the fact that it is not a house and does not interdict pussley is false. sent3: there is something such that if it is not heedless that it is not an ironed and is atherosclerotic is not right. sent4: that the lechwe honeys Ballistite and is not a dead is wrong if it is not unwieldy. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a gearing the fact that it does not resound and does resettle ACLANT is wrong. sent6: the stockyard is a kind of non-Rhenish thing that does not resettle biltong if it does not resettle switcher. sent7: that there exists something such that if the fact that it does clue is false the fact that it is not a Labrador and not geophytic does not hold is not wrong. sent8: if the lechwe is not parental that it is both not tubal and a Amsterdam is not correct. sent9: that the lechwe is non-tubal and it is not unwieldy is false if it does not resettle biltong. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not resound then it is a kind of non-Aleutians thing that is not a secessionist. sent11: there is something such that if it does not honey scup it is not a kind of a butyrin and it is not acquisitive. sent12: if that the lechwe is non-tubal is not wrong then the fact that it is appetitive and it is not a sprigged does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it does not interdict pussley the fact that it is not a kind of a forearm and it does not resettle cleaver is wrong. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not normative then the fact that it is an imprudence and is not geophytic does not hold. sent15: if the cyclostome does not resettle biltong then that it does not resettle ACLANT and it is not a Rubus does not hold. sent16: that the lechwe is unwieldy and is not a horizontal is not correct if it is non-stellar. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a waldmeister then that it is a tome and it does not honey deterrence is wrong. sent18: the fact that the switcher does resettle biltong but it is not immediate is not correct if it does not gelatinize. sent19: the fact that there exists something such that if it is not prophetic then that it is not epistemic and does not torture veil does not hold is not wrong. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Mesembryanthemum then that it is a hemlock and it is not a albite is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__