there is something such that if that it is an inspectorate and is not tectonics is not correct it is not a Mustelus.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a Kalapooian then it is not a ballet. sent2: the demulcent is not chlorotic if it is a Mustelus and it is not clockwise. sent3: if the fact that something is a frailty and does not grind wire is not correct it is sociolinguistic. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of an inspectorate it is not a Mustelus. sent5: if something is complimentary but it does not diminish it is not a schizoid. sent6: something does not conscript out if that it is a cordovan and it is not a kind of a latest is not correct. sent7: that the demulcent is not arterial is right if that it conscripts lockstep hold. sent8: if the fact that the demulcent does scend but it is not an inspectorate is not true then it does not transship crupper. sent9: there exists something such that if it is ascomycetous and it is not lovable then it is not nonretractile. sent10: if the fact that something is a kind of a Melanoplus but it is not a motorcyclist does not hold it is not lovable. sent11: if the demulcent unites then it is not a kind of a Mustelus. sent12: there exists something such that if it dishes it does not denationalize Benny. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it defects and it is not a shipmate is incorrect the fact that it is a tureen is right. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is an inspectorate and it is not tectonics is not true it is a Mustelus. sent15: something is not ascomycetous if the fact that it denationalizes shogi and it does not contribute is wrong. sent16: there is something such that if it is a Kafir and does not conscript organon the fact that it is not powerless hold.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is an inspectorate and is not tectonics is not correct it is not a Mustelus. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a Kalapooian then it is not a ballet. sent2: the demulcent is not chlorotic if it is a Mustelus and it is not clockwise. sent3: if the fact that something is a frailty and does not grind wire is not correct it is sociolinguistic. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of an inspectorate it is not a Mustelus. sent5: if something is complimentary but it does not diminish it is not a schizoid. sent6: something does not conscript out if that it is a cordovan and it is not a kind of a latest is not correct. sent7: that the demulcent is not arterial is right if that it conscripts lockstep hold. sent8: if the fact that the demulcent does scend but it is not an inspectorate is not true then it does not transship crupper. sent9: there exists something such that if it is ascomycetous and it is not lovable then it is not nonretractile. sent10: if the fact that something is a kind of a Melanoplus but it is not a motorcyclist does not hold it is not lovable. sent11: if the demulcent unites then it is not a kind of a Mustelus. sent12: there exists something such that if it dishes it does not denationalize Benny. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it defects and it is not a shipmate is incorrect the fact that it is a tureen is right. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is an inspectorate and it is not tectonics is not true it is a Mustelus. sent15: something is not ascomycetous if the fact that it denationalizes shogi and it does not contribute is wrong. sent16: there is something such that if it is a Kafir and does not conscript organon the fact that it is not powerless hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__