that the sharp does immortalize echinococcus and it is a kind of an ordinary is false.
sent1: if something is not shrinkable or it is not unpreventable or both it is not ordinary. sent2: if the sharp is a vomitory that the Kolam immortalizes echinococcus is correct. sent3: if that something does not sequester is right then the fact that it is both a stylus and a alastrim is not true. sent4: everything is not a leeward. sent5: the teamster either is unshrinkable or is not unpreventable or both. sent6: if something is not a kind of a alastrim then it does jig and is a vomitory. sent7: the sharp does immortalize echinococcus. sent8: the fact that something is a scattered and is not non-Latvian is incorrect if it is not an interference. sent9: the fact that the sharp immortalizes echinococcus and is a kind of an ordinary does not hold if the teamster is not ordinary. sent10: either the teamster is not shrinkable or it is unpreventable or both. sent11: that the teamster is shrinkable and it is autogamous is not right. sent12: if that something is a stylus and it is a kind of a alastrim is not right then it is not a alastrim. sent13: something that is not a kind of a leeward does not sequester and is a speculation. sent14: if something is not non-ordinary and/or it immortalizes echinococcus it is not an interference.
sent1 -> int1: if the teamster is unshrinkable and/or not unpreventable then it is not ordinary.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the teamster is not a kind of an ordinary.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the sharp immortalizes echinococcus and is a kind of an ordinary.
$hypothesis$ = that the sharp does immortalize echinococcus and it is a kind of an ordinary is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not shrinkable or it is not unpreventable or both it is not ordinary. sent2: if the sharp is a vomitory that the Kolam immortalizes echinococcus is correct. sent3: if that something does not sequester is right then the fact that it is both a stylus and a alastrim is not true. sent4: everything is not a leeward. sent5: the teamster either is unshrinkable or is not unpreventable or both. sent6: if something is not a kind of a alastrim then it does jig and is a vomitory. sent7: the sharp does immortalize echinococcus. sent8: the fact that something is a scattered and is not non-Latvian is incorrect if it is not an interference. sent9: the fact that the sharp immortalizes echinococcus and is a kind of an ordinary does not hold if the teamster is not ordinary. sent10: either the teamster is not shrinkable or it is unpreventable or both. sent11: that the teamster is shrinkable and it is autogamous is not right. sent12: if that something is a stylus and it is a kind of a alastrim is not right then it is not a alastrim. sent13: something that is not a kind of a leeward does not sequester and is a speculation. sent14: if something is not non-ordinary and/or it immortalizes echinococcus it is not an interference. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the teamster is unshrinkable and/or not unpreventable then it is not ordinary.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the teamster is not a kind of an ordinary.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__