the conenose does not invoke tabby.
sent1: if something is a sleepiness then it is harmful. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a ramontchi and it is a martingale is not false is incorrect the tabby is not a martingale. sent3: if the duster is regenerating and it is chancrous then the conenose does clear-cut. sent4: the duster does clear-cut. sent5: the conenose invokes tabby if it clear-cuts. sent6: if that the hemiepiphyte does gather wherewithal is not incorrect that the condominium is not a kind of a ramontchi but it is a martingale is wrong. sent7: everything is a kind of regenerating thing that is not chancrous. sent8: the hemiepiphyte is a kind of a sleepiness. sent9: something does clear-cut and is a minstrelsy if it is not a kind of a martingale. sent10: if something is harmful it gathers wherewithal. sent11: the duster is not chancrous. sent12: if the duster does regenerate but it is not chancrous then the conenose clear-cuts. sent13: everything is not chancrous.
sent7 -> int1: the duster is regenerating thing that is not chancrous.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the conenose does clear-cut.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the conenose does not invoke tabby is not wrong.
sent9 -> int3: the tabby clear-cuts and it is a minstrelsy if that it is not a martingale hold.; sent10 -> int4: the hemiepiphyte does gather wherewithal if it is harmful.; sent1 -> int5: if the hemiepiphyte is a sleepiness then it is harmful.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the hemiepiphyte is harmful.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the hemiepiphyte does gather wherewithal.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the condominium is not a ramontchi but it is a martingale does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is both not a ramontchi and a martingale does not hold.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the tabby is not a martingale.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the tabby clear-cuts and it is a kind of a minstrelsy.; int11 -> int12: that there is something such that it clear-cuts and it is a kind of a minstrelsy is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the conenose does not invoke tabby. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a sleepiness then it is harmful. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a ramontchi and it is a martingale is not false is incorrect the tabby is not a martingale. sent3: if the duster is regenerating and it is chancrous then the conenose does clear-cut. sent4: the duster does clear-cut. sent5: the conenose invokes tabby if it clear-cuts. sent6: if that the hemiepiphyte does gather wherewithal is not incorrect that the condominium is not a kind of a ramontchi but it is a martingale is wrong. sent7: everything is a kind of regenerating thing that is not chancrous. sent8: the hemiepiphyte is a kind of a sleepiness. sent9: something does clear-cut and is a minstrelsy if it is not a kind of a martingale. sent10: if something is harmful it gathers wherewithal. sent11: the duster is not chancrous. sent12: if the duster does regenerate but it is not chancrous then the conenose clear-cuts. sent13: everything is not chancrous. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the duster is regenerating thing that is not chancrous.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the conenose does clear-cut.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__