the fact that the clypeus is not a kumquat if the peptide winds is not right.
sent1: The fact that the homo frets drippings is incorrect. sent2: the clypeus is a kind of a kumquat if the peptide is a wind. sent3: the fact that something rays or it is not epigastric or both is not correct if it is a tide. sent4: the fact that the clypeus is a kumquat is not incorrect if the peptide is a kind of a Tamarix and it does wind. sent5: the fact that the drippings frets homo is incorrect. sent6: the peptide does not rede psychology. sent7: if the drippings does not rede psychology then the peptide does not fret homo and is a kind of a wind. sent8: if that the fact that either the ixodid is a ray or it is not epigastric or both hold is not right then the clypeus is branchless. sent9: the clypeus is not a Tamarix and redes psychology if the peptide is not a kumquat. sent10: the peptide does not rede psychology if the drippings does not fret homo. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of metaphysical thing that does fret inadequacy is not true then the ixodid is a tide. sent12: the fact that the clypeus does not wind is not false. sent13: the peptide does fret homo. sent14: that if the dictyosome is not atomistic then that the lightship does crave and slumps is false is not incorrect. sent15: the clypeus is not a Tamarix if the peptide is both a wind and a kumquat. sent16: the fact that something is metaphysical thing that does fret inadequacy is not true if it does not crave. sent17: that the clypeus does not fret homo hold. sent18: if the drippings does not fret homo the peptide does not rede psychology and is a kind of a Tamarix. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it does crave and does slump does not hold then the stemmer does not crave. sent20: the dictyosome is not atomistic. sent21: the clypeus is not a kumquat if the peptide is a Tamarix and it is a wind. sent22: the sodalist does not fret homo if the drippings is not a kind of a wind. sent23: the clypeus is a kumquat. sent24: the peptide is not a kind of a kumquat and it is not syllogistic if the clypeus is branchless.
sent18 & sent5 -> int1: the peptide does not rede psychology but it is a Tamarix.; int1 -> int2: the peptide is a Tamarix.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peptide is a wind.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the fact that the peptide is a Tamarix and it is a wind hold.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the clypeus is not a kumquat is true.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the sodalist does not fret homo.
sent3 -> int5: if the ixodid tides then that it either rays or is not epigastric or both is wrong.; sent16 -> int6: if the stemmer does not crave then that it is a kind of metaphysical thing that does fret inadequacy is wrong.; sent14 & sent20 -> int7: that the lightship craves and it does slump is false.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it does crave and slumps does not hold.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the stemmer does not crave.; int6 & int9 -> int10: that the stemmer is metaphysical and does fret inadequacy is not true.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is a kind of metaphysical thing that frets inadequacy does not hold.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the ixodid is a tide.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the ixodid does ray and/or it is not epigastric is not correct.; sent8 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the clypeus is not branchless is not true.; sent24 & int14 -> int15: the peptide is not a kind of a kumquat and is not syllogistic.; int15 -> int16: something is not a kumquat and it is not syllogistic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the clypeus is not a kumquat if the peptide winds is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: The fact that the homo frets drippings is incorrect. sent2: the clypeus is a kind of a kumquat if the peptide is a wind. sent3: the fact that something rays or it is not epigastric or both is not correct if it is a tide. sent4: the fact that the clypeus is a kumquat is not incorrect if the peptide is a kind of a Tamarix and it does wind. sent5: the fact that the drippings frets homo is incorrect. sent6: the peptide does not rede psychology. sent7: if the drippings does not rede psychology then the peptide does not fret homo and is a kind of a wind. sent8: if that the fact that either the ixodid is a ray or it is not epigastric or both hold is not right then the clypeus is branchless. sent9: the clypeus is not a Tamarix and redes psychology if the peptide is not a kumquat. sent10: the peptide does not rede psychology if the drippings does not fret homo. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of metaphysical thing that does fret inadequacy is not true then the ixodid is a tide. sent12: the fact that the clypeus does not wind is not false. sent13: the peptide does fret homo. sent14: that if the dictyosome is not atomistic then that the lightship does crave and slumps is false is not incorrect. sent15: the clypeus is not a Tamarix if the peptide is both a wind and a kumquat. sent16: the fact that something is metaphysical thing that does fret inadequacy is not true if it does not crave. sent17: that the clypeus does not fret homo hold. sent18: if the drippings does not fret homo the peptide does not rede psychology and is a kind of a Tamarix. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it does crave and does slump does not hold then the stemmer does not crave. sent20: the dictyosome is not atomistic. sent21: the clypeus is not a kumquat if the peptide is a Tamarix and it is a wind. sent22: the sodalist does not fret homo if the drippings is not a kind of a wind. sent23: the clypeus is a kumquat. sent24: the peptide is not a kind of a kumquat and it is not syllogistic if the clypeus is branchless. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent5 -> int1: the peptide does not rede psychology but it is a Tamarix.; int1 -> int2: the peptide is a Tamarix.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the peptide is a wind.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the fact that the peptide is a Tamarix and it is a wind hold.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the fact that the clypeus is not a kumquat is true.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__