the grouch does not remodel Rothko and it does not adjoin quotability.
sent1: if the blowhole is not urceolate then the xanthophyll is a defilade but it is not chlorophyllose. sent2: the grouch is nonreticulate and it emulsifies oversight. sent3: if the xanthophyll does not emulsify actinolite and it is not hermeneutic then the darter is not hermeneutic. sent4: a non-ferric thing does argue or is not a twenty or both. sent5: the xanthophyll is not ferric if it is a kind of a defilade and it is not chlorophyllose. sent6: if something adjoins quotability then the fact that it is not hermeneutic and not nonreticulate is not right. sent7: something does not remodel Rothko and it does not adjoin quotability if it is hermeneutic. sent8: something does not emulsify actinolite and it is not hermeneutic if that it does not photograph IDF is true. sent9: if the darter is not hermeneutic the fact that the fact that the polluter does not emulsify oversight but it is nonreticulate is true is false. sent10: the blowhole is not urceolate. sent11: something does not photograph IDF if it argues and/or is not a twenty. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it does not emulsify oversight and it is nonreticulate is false the whiff does adjoin quotability.
sent2 -> int1: the grouch emulsifies oversight.; sent7 -> int2: the grouch does not remodel Rothko and does not adjoin quotability if it is hermeneutic.;
the calliandra does emulsify oversight.
sent6 -> int3: the fact that the grouch is not hermeneutic and it is reticulate is not right if the fact that it does adjoin quotability hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the grouch does not remodel Rothko and it does not adjoin quotability. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blowhole is not urceolate then the xanthophyll is a defilade but it is not chlorophyllose. sent2: the grouch is nonreticulate and it emulsifies oversight. sent3: if the xanthophyll does not emulsify actinolite and it is not hermeneutic then the darter is not hermeneutic. sent4: a non-ferric thing does argue or is not a twenty or both. sent5: the xanthophyll is not ferric if it is a kind of a defilade and it is not chlorophyllose. sent6: if something adjoins quotability then the fact that it is not hermeneutic and not nonreticulate is not right. sent7: something does not remodel Rothko and it does not adjoin quotability if it is hermeneutic. sent8: something does not emulsify actinolite and it is not hermeneutic if that it does not photograph IDF is true. sent9: if the darter is not hermeneutic the fact that the fact that the polluter does not emulsify oversight but it is nonreticulate is true is false. sent10: the blowhole is not urceolate. sent11: something does not photograph IDF if it argues and/or is not a twenty. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it does not emulsify oversight and it is nonreticulate is false the whiff does adjoin quotability. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the grouch emulsifies oversight.; sent7 -> int2: the grouch does not remodel Rothko and does not adjoin quotability if it is hermeneutic.; __UNKNOWN__