the cabstand is not nontaxable.
sent1: if something that is not a unhelpfulness is not a Methuselah the pattern is Jamesian. sent2: everything is not a hematology and/or it is not a Methuselah. sent3: something is not a minimization and it does not mope. sent4: if something that is not a unhelpfulness is a self-discipline then it is nontaxable. sent5: the Marsh is not a unhelpfulness and does not coach combining if there exists something such that it is a self-discipline. sent6: there is something such that it is a self-discipline. sent7: something is not nontaxable. sent8: the fact that the mudhif is Jamesian if the pattern is both not Jamesian and not a Methuselah is not incorrect. sent9: the pattern is a unhelpfulness if something that is not Jamesian is not a Methuselah. sent10: if something does coach combining then it is not a unhelpfulness and it is a kind of a self-discipline. sent11: something is not a hematology if it is not a kind of a hematology and/or it is not a kind of a Methuselah. sent12: the pattern is Jamesian and is not a kind of a Methuselah. sent13: if something is not a kind of a hematology then that it is not coccal and it is not Jamesian is incorrect. sent14: that the mudhif is coccal hold if there is something such that it is not a unhelpfulness and does not coach combining. sent15: if something is both coccal and Jamesian the cabstand is not nontaxable. sent16: the cabstand is not Jamesian if something is a unhelpfulness that is nontaxable.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the Marsh is not a kind of a unhelpfulness and it does not coach combining.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a unhelpfulness and it does not coach combining.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the mudhif is coccal.; sent8 & sent12 -> int4: the mudhif is Jamesian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mudhif is both coccal and not non-Jamesian.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is coccal and is Jamesian.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the cabstand is nontaxable.
sent4 -> int7: if the cabstand is not a unhelpfulness but a self-discipline it is nontaxable.; sent10 -> int8: if the cabstand does coach combining then it is not a unhelpfulness and is a self-discipline.; sent11 -> int9: the pattern is not a kind of a hematology if it is not a hematology and/or it is not a Methuselah.; sent2 -> int10: the pattern is either not a hematology or not a Methuselah or both.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the pattern is not a hematology.; int11 -> int12: everything is not a hematology.; int12 -> int13: the mudhif is not a hematology.; sent13 -> int14: that the mudhif is not coccal and is not Jamesian does not hold if it is not a hematology.; int13 & int14 -> int15: that the mudhif is both not coccal and not Jamesian is wrong.; int15 -> int16: there exists nothing such that it is not coccal and it is not Jamesian.; int16 -> int17: that the Marsh is not coccal and it is not Jamesian is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the cabstand is not nontaxable. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a unhelpfulness is not a Methuselah the pattern is Jamesian. sent2: everything is not a hematology and/or it is not a Methuselah. sent3: something is not a minimization and it does not mope. sent4: if something that is not a unhelpfulness is a self-discipline then it is nontaxable. sent5: the Marsh is not a unhelpfulness and does not coach combining if there exists something such that it is a self-discipline. sent6: there is something such that it is a self-discipline. sent7: something is not nontaxable. sent8: the fact that the mudhif is Jamesian if the pattern is both not Jamesian and not a Methuselah is not incorrect. sent9: the pattern is a unhelpfulness if something that is not Jamesian is not a Methuselah. sent10: if something does coach combining then it is not a unhelpfulness and it is a kind of a self-discipline. sent11: something is not a hematology if it is not a kind of a hematology and/or it is not a kind of a Methuselah. sent12: the pattern is Jamesian and is not a kind of a Methuselah. sent13: if something is not a kind of a hematology then that it is not coccal and it is not Jamesian is incorrect. sent14: that the mudhif is coccal hold if there is something such that it is not a unhelpfulness and does not coach combining. sent15: if something is both coccal and Jamesian the cabstand is not nontaxable. sent16: the cabstand is not Jamesian if something is a unhelpfulness that is nontaxable. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the Marsh is not a kind of a unhelpfulness and it does not coach combining.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a unhelpfulness and it does not coach combining.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the mudhif is coccal.; sent8 & sent12 -> int4: the mudhif is Jamesian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mudhif is both coccal and not non-Jamesian.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is coccal and is Jamesian.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__