the fact that the anticipating but not the phenomenon happens is false.
sent1: that the non-accusatorialness and the culdoscopy occurs triggers that the factory-madeness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the factory-madeness does not occur and the anticipating does not occur is incorrect if the phenomenon happens. sent3: not the accusatorialness but the culdoscopy happens. sent4: the nestling occurs. sent5: if that the fact that the factory-madeness does not occur and the anticipating does not occur is incorrect is not incorrect the benedictoriness does not occur. sent6: the traction does not occur and the benedictoriness does not occur. sent7: if the anticipating does not occur the camphoricness does not occur and the whip does not occur. sent8: that the camphoricness does not occur and the whip does not occur brings about that the factory-madeness happens. sent9: if the elucidation does not occur and the castigation does not occur then the phenomenon does not occur. sent10: that the phenomenon does not occur is prevented by the castigation. sent11: the phenomenon does not occur if the elucidation occurs and the castigation does not occur. sent12: the elucidation does not occur and the castigation does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anticipating does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the camphoricness does not occur and the whipping does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the factory-madeness occurs is true.; sent1 & sent3 -> int3: the factory-madeness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the anticipating occurs is not incorrect.; sent9 & sent12 -> int6: the phenomenon does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the anticipating happens and the phenomenon does not occur is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the anticipating but not the phenomenon happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the non-accusatorialness and the culdoscopy occurs triggers that the factory-madeness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the factory-madeness does not occur and the anticipating does not occur is incorrect if the phenomenon happens. sent3: not the accusatorialness but the culdoscopy happens. sent4: the nestling occurs. sent5: if that the fact that the factory-madeness does not occur and the anticipating does not occur is incorrect is not incorrect the benedictoriness does not occur. sent6: the traction does not occur and the benedictoriness does not occur. sent7: if the anticipating does not occur the camphoricness does not occur and the whip does not occur. sent8: that the camphoricness does not occur and the whip does not occur brings about that the factory-madeness happens. sent9: if the elucidation does not occur and the castigation does not occur then the phenomenon does not occur. sent10: that the phenomenon does not occur is prevented by the castigation. sent11: the phenomenon does not occur if the elucidation occurs and the castigation does not occur. sent12: the elucidation does not occur and the castigation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anticipating does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the camphoricness does not occur and the whipping does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the factory-madeness occurs is true.; sent1 & sent3 -> int3: the factory-madeness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the anticipating occurs is not incorrect.; sent9 & sent12 -> int6: the phenomenon does not occur.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__