the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bigotry it does not copy pluralism and is not an aversion does not hold.
sent1: if the rigger is a kind of a nonpartisan then it is not a kind of a Ataturk and it does not copy pluralism. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a bigotry is not false it is not an aversion. sent3: there exists something such that if it is bicipital it is not a Marxist and it is not an overhaul. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bigotry then it copies pluralism and is not an aversion. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a bigotry is true then it does not copy pluralism and is a kind of an aversion. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bigotry it does not copy pluralism. sent7: if the executive copies pluralism then it is not ameboid and it is not a voicer. sent8: the executive is not an aversion and it does not glamorize sprag if it copies bourgeoisie. sent9: there is something such that if it is a speciousness then the fact that it does not dominate credits and it is non-littoral is correct. sent10: there is something such that if it is not non-hyperemic it is not an equivalence and it is not Creole. sent11: the rigger does not copy pluralism and it is not a kind of an aversion if it is a bigotry. sent12: the rigger does not copy pluralism if it is a bigotry. sent13: the rigger is not a opah and it is not uneven if it is a bigotry. sent14: something that is a bait is both not dysphoric and not hexangular. sent15: something is both not a Semitic and not a Creole if it copies rigger. sent16: the rigger does not copy pluralism but it is an aversion if the fact that it is a bigotry is right. sent17: if the rigger is an aversion it does not hate vulture and it is not a murre.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a bait it is both not dysphoric and not hexangular.
sent14 -> int1: that the hauberk is both not dysphoric and not hexangular is correct if it baits.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bigotry it does not copy pluralism and is not an aversion does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rigger is a kind of a nonpartisan then it is not a kind of a Ataturk and it does not copy pluralism. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a bigotry is not false it is not an aversion. sent3: there exists something such that if it is bicipital it is not a Marxist and it is not an overhaul. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bigotry then it copies pluralism and is not an aversion. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a bigotry is true then it does not copy pluralism and is a kind of an aversion. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bigotry it does not copy pluralism. sent7: if the executive copies pluralism then it is not ameboid and it is not a voicer. sent8: the executive is not an aversion and it does not glamorize sprag if it copies bourgeoisie. sent9: there is something such that if it is a speciousness then the fact that it does not dominate credits and it is non-littoral is correct. sent10: there is something such that if it is not non-hyperemic it is not an equivalence and it is not Creole. sent11: the rigger does not copy pluralism and it is not a kind of an aversion if it is a bigotry. sent12: the rigger does not copy pluralism if it is a bigotry. sent13: the rigger is not a opah and it is not uneven if it is a bigotry. sent14: something that is a bait is both not dysphoric and not hexangular. sent15: something is both not a Semitic and not a Creole if it copies rigger. sent16: the rigger does not copy pluralism but it is an aversion if the fact that it is a bigotry is right. sent17: if the rigger is an aversion it does not hate vulture and it is not a murre. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__