the electrologist is a parallel.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Unitarianism and it is not a Lambert is wrong then the electrologist parallels. sent2: that the annotator is both not a Unitarianism and not a parallel is not true. sent3: that that the annotator is both not parallel and not a Lambert hold is not right. sent4: the fact that the electrologist is not a spraying and not a Wykeham is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Pashto that is not a purgatory is not true. sent6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a spraying. sent7: that the electrologist is both a parallel and not a Unitarianism is not true if there is something such that it is a Lambert. sent8: that the annotator is a Unitarianism but it is not a Lambert is false if there is something such that it is a spraying. sent9: if there exists something such that it does spray then that the annotator is not a Unitarianism but it is a Lambert is not right. sent10: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Unitarianism and it is parallel is false. sent11: there is something such that that it is a kind of a parallel is correct. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not advise and is resolute does not hold. sent13: the fact that the annotator is a kind of non-parallel thing that is not a Unitarianism is false. sent14: the annotator is a parallel if there exists something such that it is a Unitarianism.
$hypothesis$ = the electrologist is a parallel. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Unitarianism and it is not a Lambert is wrong then the electrologist parallels. sent2: that the annotator is both not a Unitarianism and not a parallel is not true. sent3: that that the annotator is both not parallel and not a Lambert hold is not right. sent4: the fact that the electrologist is not a spraying and not a Wykeham is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Pashto that is not a purgatory is not true. sent6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a spraying. sent7: that the electrologist is both a parallel and not a Unitarianism is not true if there is something such that it is a Lambert. sent8: that the annotator is a Unitarianism but it is not a Lambert is false if there is something such that it is a spraying. sent9: if there exists something such that it does spray then that the annotator is not a Unitarianism but it is a Lambert is not right. sent10: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Unitarianism and it is parallel is false. sent11: there is something such that that it is a kind of a parallel is correct. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not advise and is resolute does not hold. sent13: the fact that the annotator is a kind of non-parallel thing that is not a Unitarianism is false. sent14: the annotator is a parallel if there exists something such that it is a Unitarianism. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__