the Frenchman is a Urmia and is a Molokai.
sent1: the hooks cases if that the sexist either is not visible or is not a kind of a cases or both is false. sent2: the fact that the home-farm is not a case and it is not a pogonion is incorrect if there is something such that it does not unloose. sent3: the hooks does not right viscometer if the fact that the seigneur is not visible is not incorrect. sent4: the sexist is not a kind of a Croesus. sent5: if something does not right viscometer it is monometallic thing that is uncritical. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does not unloose hold. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a Croesus the Frenchman is a Molokai. sent8: the Frenchman is a Urmia if the hooks is uncritical. sent9: if the divide rights viscometer the dumper is a pogonion. sent10: if the sporophyte does right viscometer then the divide does right viscometer. sent11: the fact that the sporophyte does right viscometer is right if it is monometallic. sent12: the fact that the sexist either is not visible or is not a case or both does not hold if the dumper is a pogonion. sent13: the fact that the seigneur does not unloose but it is a Molokai is not correct if the hooks cases. sent14: if that the hooks is not a pogonion and it is not a case is not right then the home-farm does not right viscometer. sent15: the seigneur is not visible if the home-farm is a kind of a pogonion. sent16: there is something such that it is a kind of a Molokai. sent17: if something is not a pogonion it is a kind of a Molokai and is not critical.
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: that the home-farm does not case and is not a pogonion does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the hooks does not right viscometer then it is monometallic and it is uncritical.; sent4 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a Croesus.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the Frenchman is a Molokai.;
that the Frenchman is a Urmia and it is a Molokai does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the Frenchman is a Urmia and is a Molokai. ; $context$ = sent1: the hooks cases if that the sexist either is not visible or is not a kind of a cases or both is false. sent2: the fact that the home-farm is not a case and it is not a pogonion is incorrect if there is something such that it does not unloose. sent3: the hooks does not right viscometer if the fact that the seigneur is not visible is not incorrect. sent4: the sexist is not a kind of a Croesus. sent5: if something does not right viscometer it is monometallic thing that is uncritical. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does not unloose hold. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a Croesus the Frenchman is a Molokai. sent8: the Frenchman is a Urmia if the hooks is uncritical. sent9: if the divide rights viscometer the dumper is a pogonion. sent10: if the sporophyte does right viscometer then the divide does right viscometer. sent11: the fact that the sporophyte does right viscometer is right if it is monometallic. sent12: the fact that the sexist either is not visible or is not a case or both does not hold if the dumper is a pogonion. sent13: the fact that the seigneur does not unloose but it is a Molokai is not correct if the hooks cases. sent14: if that the hooks is not a pogonion and it is not a case is not right then the home-farm does not right viscometer. sent15: the seigneur is not visible if the home-farm is a kind of a pogonion. sent16: there is something such that it is a kind of a Molokai. sent17: if something is not a pogonion it is a kind of a Molokai and is not critical. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: that the home-farm does not case and is not a pogonion does not hold.; sent5 -> int2: if the hooks does not right viscometer then it is monometallic and it is uncritical.; sent4 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a Croesus.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the Frenchman is a Molokai.; __UNKNOWN__