the newness does not occur.
sent1: the ushering liter does not occur if the fact that the ushering liter but not the exhilarating armamentarium happens is not right. sent2: the refunding does not occur if the fact that the three-hitter occurs is correct. sent3: that the newness does not occur is brought about by that the paranormalness does not occur and the refund does not occur. sent4: the historicalness does not occur. sent5: if the desquamating does not occur the fact that the exhilarating armamentarium happens is not false. sent6: that the ushering liter occurs but the exhilarating armamentarium does not occur does not hold if the paranormalness occurs. sent7: the fact that that the subordinating does not occur but the three-hitter occurs is not incorrect triggers the non-pyrolyticness. sent8: the refunding does not occur if the subordinatingness does not occur. sent9: that the start does not occur yields that the immunodeficientness and the postulating happens. sent10: the three-hitter and/or the non-subordinatingness is triggered by that the immunodeficientness does not occur. sent11: the MRI does not occur. sent12: the immunodeficientness does not occur. sent13: the exhilarating armamentarium does not occur and the pyrolyticness happens. sent14: if the fact that the pyrolyticness does not occur is true the paranormalness occurs and the refunding happens. sent15: the paranormalness does not occur if that the desquamating does not occur and the ushering liter does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the desquamating does not occur and the ushering liter does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the desquamating does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the exhilarating armamentarium happens.; sent13 -> int3: the exhilarating armamentarium does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the desquamating does not occur and the ushering liter does not occur is false.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the paranormalness does not occur.; sent10 & sent12 -> int7: the three-hitter and/or the non-subordinatingness happens.; int7 & sent2 & sent8 -> int8: that the refund does not occur hold.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the paranormalness does not occur and the refund does not occur.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the newness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the newness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ushering liter does not occur if the fact that the ushering liter but not the exhilarating armamentarium happens is not right. sent2: the refunding does not occur if the fact that the three-hitter occurs is correct. sent3: that the newness does not occur is brought about by that the paranormalness does not occur and the refund does not occur. sent4: the historicalness does not occur. sent5: if the desquamating does not occur the fact that the exhilarating armamentarium happens is not false. sent6: that the ushering liter occurs but the exhilarating armamentarium does not occur does not hold if the paranormalness occurs. sent7: the fact that that the subordinating does not occur but the three-hitter occurs is not incorrect triggers the non-pyrolyticness. sent8: the refunding does not occur if the subordinatingness does not occur. sent9: that the start does not occur yields that the immunodeficientness and the postulating happens. sent10: the three-hitter and/or the non-subordinatingness is triggered by that the immunodeficientness does not occur. sent11: the MRI does not occur. sent12: the immunodeficientness does not occur. sent13: the exhilarating armamentarium does not occur and the pyrolyticness happens. sent14: if the fact that the pyrolyticness does not occur is true the paranormalness occurs and the refunding happens. sent15: the paranormalness does not occur if that the desquamating does not occur and the ushering liter does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the desquamating does not occur and the ushering liter does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the desquamating does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the exhilarating armamentarium happens.; sent13 -> int3: the exhilarating armamentarium does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the desquamating does not occur and the ushering liter does not occur is false.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the paranormalness does not occur.; sent10 & sent12 -> int7: the three-hitter and/or the non-subordinatingness happens.; int7 & sent2 & sent8 -> int8: that the refund does not occur hold.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the paranormalness does not occur and the refund does not occur.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__