the resisting happens but the lacrosse does not occur.
sent1: the amnioticness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the fell does not occur and the displeasing does not occur is wrong. sent3: that the falling happens and the displeasing does not occur is not correct. sent4: the resisting happens if that the falling does not occur and the displeasing does not occur is wrong. sent5: that the retardation does not occur is prevented by the elegiacness. sent6: if the fact that the coif does not occur is not wrong that the resisting but not the lacrosse happens is false. sent7: the paring change-up happens. sent8: that the suppling acetate does not occur hold. sent9: the swimming Husserl does not occur if the fact that the non-factualness and the nightcap occurs is false. sent10: the fact that the fact that the ectopicness does not occur and the isothermicness happens is incorrect is not incorrect if the swimming Husserl does not occur. sent11: that the isothermicness happens is right. sent12: the coifing occurs. sent13: the fact that the hesitation does not occur but the isotropicness occurs is incorrect. sent14: the Rwandan happens. sent15: that the unsalableness does not occur and the passionateness occurs is not true if the ramble does not occur. sent16: that the flooding does not occur is prevented by the perishableness. sent17: if the displeasing and the fell happens then the isothermicness does not occur. sent18: the amethystineness does not occur. sent19: that the misdemeanor happens is prevented by the non-extinctness. sent20: if the coifing does not occur the Cenozoicness occurs but the tearlessness does not occur. sent21: if that the flood does not occur and the readjustment does not occur is incorrect then that the repudiating happens is true. sent22: if the fact that not the swimming undoer but the custody occurs is not right the masturbating does not occur. sent23: that not the overpayment but the gonadalness occurs is not true if the paring sea does not occur. sent24: the fact that the factualness does not occur and the nightcap happens does not hold. sent25: that the ectopicness does not occur is triggered by that the coif occurs and the lacrosse happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lacrosse happens.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the coifing happens and the lacrosse occurs.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the ectopicness does not occur.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the non-ectopicness and the isothermicness happens.; sent9 & sent24 -> int4: the swimming Husserl does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the ectopicness does not occur but the isothermicness occurs is not right.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the lacrosse does not occur.; sent4 & sent2 -> int8: the resisting occurs.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the resisting happens but the lacrosse does not occur is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the resisting happens but the lacrosse does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the amnioticness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the fell does not occur and the displeasing does not occur is wrong. sent3: that the falling happens and the displeasing does not occur is not correct. sent4: the resisting happens if that the falling does not occur and the displeasing does not occur is wrong. sent5: that the retardation does not occur is prevented by the elegiacness. sent6: if the fact that the coif does not occur is not wrong that the resisting but not the lacrosse happens is false. sent7: the paring change-up happens. sent8: that the suppling acetate does not occur hold. sent9: the swimming Husserl does not occur if the fact that the non-factualness and the nightcap occurs is false. sent10: the fact that the fact that the ectopicness does not occur and the isothermicness happens is incorrect is not incorrect if the swimming Husserl does not occur. sent11: that the isothermicness happens is right. sent12: the coifing occurs. sent13: the fact that the hesitation does not occur but the isotropicness occurs is incorrect. sent14: the Rwandan happens. sent15: that the unsalableness does not occur and the passionateness occurs is not true if the ramble does not occur. sent16: that the flooding does not occur is prevented by the perishableness. sent17: if the displeasing and the fell happens then the isothermicness does not occur. sent18: the amethystineness does not occur. sent19: that the misdemeanor happens is prevented by the non-extinctness. sent20: if the coifing does not occur the Cenozoicness occurs but the tearlessness does not occur. sent21: if that the flood does not occur and the readjustment does not occur is incorrect then that the repudiating happens is true. sent22: if the fact that not the swimming undoer but the custody occurs is not right the masturbating does not occur. sent23: that not the overpayment but the gonadalness occurs is not true if the paring sea does not occur. sent24: the fact that the factualness does not occur and the nightcap happens does not hold. sent25: that the ectopicness does not occur is triggered by that the coif occurs and the lacrosse happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lacrosse happens.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the coifing happens and the lacrosse occurs.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the ectopicness does not occur.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the non-ectopicness and the isothermicness happens.; sent9 & sent24 -> int4: the swimming Husserl does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the ectopicness does not occur but the isothermicness occurs is not right.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the lacrosse does not occur.; sent4 & sent2 -> int8: the resisting occurs.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__