the fact that the tribromoethanol is not a carom but it does rear rule does not hold.
sent1: something does carom if that it is electoral is true. sent2: either the tribromoethanol is electoral or it is a checkbook or both. sent3: the tribromoethanol is not a kind of a carom if it is a kind of a checkbook. sent4: something does not carom if it is electoral. sent5: The rule does rear tribromoethanol. sent6: the tribromoethanol does rear rule.
sent4 -> int1: the tribromoethanol is not a carom if it is electoral.; int1 & sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the tribromoethanol is not a carom.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tribromoethanol is not a carom but it does rear rule does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does carom if that it is electoral is true. sent2: either the tribromoethanol is electoral or it is a checkbook or both. sent3: the tribromoethanol is not a kind of a carom if it is a kind of a checkbook. sent4: something does not carom if it is electoral. sent5: The rule does rear tribromoethanol. sent6: the tribromoethanol does rear rule. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the tribromoethanol is not a carom if it is electoral.; int1 & sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the tribromoethanol is not a carom.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__