the difference happens and the priestliness happens.
sent1: that the afterglow happens is caused by that the convening happens and the diving syllable does not occur. sent2: that the geriatricsness does not occur is not wrong. sent3: that the nonlexicalness happens and the diving bustle occurs is caused by that the FIFO does not occur. sent4: the nonlexicalness does not occur. sent5: the convening but not the diving syllable occurs. sent6: that the respecting multiplication occurs is brought about by that the racism occurs and the diving fruitlessness does not occur. sent7: if that the nonlexicalness happens is correct the geriatricsness does not occur. sent8: the geriatricsness does not occur if the nonlexicalness does not occur. sent9: if that that both the afterglow and the priestliness occurs is false hold then the entericness does not occur. sent10: that both the convening and the diving syllable happens brings about that the afterglow happens. sent11: the diving syllable does not occur. sent12: if the nonlexicalness does not occur the difference occurs and the geriatricsness does not occur. sent13: the priestliness happens if the afterglow happens.
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the afterglow occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the priestliness happens.; sent12 & sent4 -> int3: the difference occurs and the geriatricsness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the difference happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the leaving and the non-entericness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the difference happens and the priestliness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the afterglow happens is caused by that the convening happens and the diving syllable does not occur. sent2: that the geriatricsness does not occur is not wrong. sent3: that the nonlexicalness happens and the diving bustle occurs is caused by that the FIFO does not occur. sent4: the nonlexicalness does not occur. sent5: the convening but not the diving syllable occurs. sent6: that the respecting multiplication occurs is brought about by that the racism occurs and the diving fruitlessness does not occur. sent7: if that the nonlexicalness happens is correct the geriatricsness does not occur. sent8: the geriatricsness does not occur if the nonlexicalness does not occur. sent9: if that that both the afterglow and the priestliness occurs is false hold then the entericness does not occur. sent10: that both the convening and the diving syllable happens brings about that the afterglow happens. sent11: the diving syllable does not occur. sent12: if the nonlexicalness does not occur the difference occurs and the geriatricsness does not occur. sent13: the priestliness happens if the afterglow happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the afterglow occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the priestliness happens.; sent12 & sent4 -> int3: the difference occurs and the geriatricsness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the difference happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__