if the vitamin is not an adultery the fact that the Bunsen is a bellows but it is not Venetian is not correct.
sent1: if the vitamin is not an adultery that the Bunsen does bellow and is a Venetian is not true. sent2: the fact that the Bunsen is a bellows and is not a Venetian is not right if the vitamin is a kind of an adultery. sent3: the vitamin is Venetian but it does not jellify neckpiece if the Bunsen is not a kind of an adultery. sent4: the vitamin is a bellows if the Bunsen is an adultery. sent5: the vitamin is a bellows. sent6: the fact that the vitamin does not jellify neckpiece hold. sent7: if something that is an adultery is a kind of a Venetian it bellows. sent8: the icefall is a Venetian. sent9: if the Bunsen is a kind of a COMINT and does not preempt parable then it is a cheatgrass. sent10: the vitamin jellifies neckpiece if it is an adultery and Venetian. sent11: if something bellows but it is not Venetian the fact that it jellifies neckpiece is correct. sent12: the Bunsen mixes. sent13: the fact that the vitamin is a bellows and an adultery does not hold. sent14: that the Bunsen is a bellows and is a Venetian is not right. sent15: that the vitamin is an adultery but it is not a kind of a Venetian is not true if the Bunsen is not a bellows. sent16: the blowtorch is not a bellows. sent17: if the Bunsen does bellow and it is a Venetian it jellifies neckpiece. sent18: the Bunsen is a kind of an adultery. sent19: if the Bunsen is not an adultery then the vitamin is a bellows but it is not a Venetian.
sent11 -> int1: the Bunsen does jellify neckpiece if it is a kind of a bellows and it is not Venetian.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Bunsen does bellow but it is not Venetian.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the Bunsen does jellify neckpiece is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = if the vitamin is not an adultery the fact that the Bunsen is a bellows but it is not Venetian is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the vitamin is not an adultery that the Bunsen does bellow and is a Venetian is not true. sent2: the fact that the Bunsen is a bellows and is not a Venetian is not right if the vitamin is a kind of an adultery. sent3: the vitamin is Venetian but it does not jellify neckpiece if the Bunsen is not a kind of an adultery. sent4: the vitamin is a bellows if the Bunsen is an adultery. sent5: the vitamin is a bellows. sent6: the fact that the vitamin does not jellify neckpiece hold. sent7: if something that is an adultery is a kind of a Venetian it bellows. sent8: the icefall is a Venetian. sent9: if the Bunsen is a kind of a COMINT and does not preempt parable then it is a cheatgrass. sent10: the vitamin jellifies neckpiece if it is an adultery and Venetian. sent11: if something bellows but it is not Venetian the fact that it jellifies neckpiece is correct. sent12: the Bunsen mixes. sent13: the fact that the vitamin is a bellows and an adultery does not hold. sent14: that the Bunsen is a bellows and is a Venetian is not right. sent15: that the vitamin is an adultery but it is not a kind of a Venetian is not true if the Bunsen is not a bellows. sent16: the blowtorch is not a bellows. sent17: if the Bunsen does bellow and it is a Venetian it jellifies neckpiece. sent18: the Bunsen is a kind of an adultery. sent19: if the Bunsen is not an adultery then the vitamin is a bellows but it is not a Venetian. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the Bunsen does jellify neckpiece if it is a kind of a bellows and it is not Venetian.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Bunsen does bellow but it is not Venetian.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the Bunsen does jellify neckpiece is not false.; __UNKNOWN__