the fact that the acetal does not deprive Agropyron but it is a micropyle is incorrect.
sent1: that the lamplighter is a ACC and it does deprive hryvnia is not correct if the Post subjects amrinone. sent2: the fact that the lamplighter is not a kind of a ACC hold if the fact that the brother is synchronous and it is a kind of a ACC is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the sphincter does not ban or it is not a latitude or both is true. sent4: the Post does subject amrinone and is not non-canonist. sent5: if that something is not a ACC but it deprives hryvnia is not true then that it is a micropyle is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the brother is a kind of synchronous a ACC is wrong if the ass does not deprive hryvnia. sent7: something that does not subject amrinone does not deprive Agropyron and is a micropyle. sent8: if the Post does subject amrinone that the fact that the lamplighter is not a ACC but it does deprive hryvnia is correct is false. sent9: that the fact that the acetal is a kind of non-canonist thing that deprives Agropyron is true is wrong if the Post does deprives Agropyron. sent10: that the acetal does not deprive Agropyron but it is a kind of a micropyle does not hold if the lamplighter is a kind of a micropyle.
sent4 -> int1: the Post subjects amrinone.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the lamplighter is not a ACC but it deprives hryvnia is not true.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the lamplighter is not a ACC but it does deprive hryvnia does not hold it is a micropyle.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the lamplighter is a kind of a micropyle.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the acetal does not deprive Agropyron but it is a micropyle.
sent7 -> int5: that the acetal does not deprive Agropyron but it is a micropyle is correct if it does not subject amrinone.; sent3 -> int6: something either is not a ban or is not a latitude or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the acetal does not deprive Agropyron but it is a micropyle is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lamplighter is a ACC and it does deprive hryvnia is not correct if the Post subjects amrinone. sent2: the fact that the lamplighter is not a kind of a ACC hold if the fact that the brother is synchronous and it is a kind of a ACC is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the sphincter does not ban or it is not a latitude or both is true. sent4: the Post does subject amrinone and is not non-canonist. sent5: if that something is not a ACC but it deprives hryvnia is not true then that it is a micropyle is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the brother is a kind of synchronous a ACC is wrong if the ass does not deprive hryvnia. sent7: something that does not subject amrinone does not deprive Agropyron and is a micropyle. sent8: if the Post does subject amrinone that the fact that the lamplighter is not a ACC but it does deprive hryvnia is correct is false. sent9: that the fact that the acetal is a kind of non-canonist thing that deprives Agropyron is true is wrong if the Post does deprives Agropyron. sent10: that the acetal does not deprive Agropyron but it is a kind of a micropyle does not hold if the lamplighter is a kind of a micropyle. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the Post subjects amrinone.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the lamplighter is not a ACC but it deprives hryvnia is not true.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the lamplighter is not a ACC but it does deprive hryvnia does not hold it is a micropyle.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the lamplighter is a kind of a micropyle.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__