that the biter is not a luff is correct.
sent1: the fact that the biter is a kind of non-non-invertible thing that is a largess is not correct if the striper is a largess. sent2: the turntable is not an analogue if that the Brahui is a kind of a telomerase and/or it is an analogue is not right. sent3: something that is non-invertible is not a largess and is unrealistic. sent4: the biter luffs if that it is not non-invertible and it is a largess is wrong. sent5: if something is not unrealistic then that it is not reputable but athletic is not right. sent6: if the striper is not athletic and it is not a largess the pediment is unrealistic. sent7: if the striper is a largess that the turntable is not arbitrable but it is a largess is wrong. sent8: if the turntable is not piezoelectric then the fact that it is both not nonarbitrable and not realistic is false. sent9: that the striper is not unrealistic but a largess does not hold. sent10: the pediment is not reputable. sent11: the turntable is not piezoelectric. sent12: something is reputable. sent13: if the Brahui is not a kind of a stature that it is a telomerase and/or it is an analogue is not right. sent14: the striper is not reputable if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a largess and it is unrealistic. sent15: if there are nonarbitrable things then the fact that the pediment is not unrealistic is right. sent16: if something is not analogue it is not oligarchic and it is arbitrable. sent17: if there exists something such that that it is reputable is right the striper is not athletic. sent18: the pediment is not unrealistic if there exists something such that the fact that it is arbitrable and not unrealistic is incorrect. sent19: if the striper is reputable then that the biter is not a largess and smokes is false. sent20: if something is piezoelectric then it is non-invertible. sent21: that something is a luff and it is athletic is not true if it is not reputable. sent22: if the biter is non-invertible then it is a luff. sent23: the pediment is piezoelectric if the turntable is a kind of non-oligarchic thing that is arbitrable.
sent12 & sent17 -> int1: the striper is non-athletic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the striper is not a largess.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the striper is not athletic and not a largess.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the pediment is unrealistic.; sent8 & sent11 -> int4: that the turntable is a kind of arbitrable thing that is unrealistic is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is arbitrable and it is unrealistic is not right.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the pediment is not unrealistic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the striper is a largess.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: that the biter is both not non-invertible and a largess does not hold.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the biter is not a luff.
sent21 -> int10: that the striper is both a luff and athletic is false if it is not reputable.; sent3 -> int11: if the pediment is non-invertible it is both not a largess and unrealistic.; sent20 -> int12: if the pediment is piezoelectric the fact that it is non-invertible is not incorrect.; sent16 -> int13: if the turntable is not a kind of an analogue it is not oligarchic and is arbitrable.;
$hypothesis$ = that the biter is not a luff is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the biter is a kind of non-non-invertible thing that is a largess is not correct if the striper is a largess. sent2: the turntable is not an analogue if that the Brahui is a kind of a telomerase and/or it is an analogue is not right. sent3: something that is non-invertible is not a largess and is unrealistic. sent4: the biter luffs if that it is not non-invertible and it is a largess is wrong. sent5: if something is not unrealistic then that it is not reputable but athletic is not right. sent6: if the striper is not athletic and it is not a largess the pediment is unrealistic. sent7: if the striper is a largess that the turntable is not arbitrable but it is a largess is wrong. sent8: if the turntable is not piezoelectric then the fact that it is both not nonarbitrable and not realistic is false. sent9: that the striper is not unrealistic but a largess does not hold. sent10: the pediment is not reputable. sent11: the turntable is not piezoelectric. sent12: something is reputable. sent13: if the Brahui is not a kind of a stature that it is a telomerase and/or it is an analogue is not right. sent14: the striper is not reputable if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a largess and it is unrealistic. sent15: if there are nonarbitrable things then the fact that the pediment is not unrealistic is right. sent16: if something is not analogue it is not oligarchic and it is arbitrable. sent17: if there exists something such that that it is reputable is right the striper is not athletic. sent18: the pediment is not unrealistic if there exists something such that the fact that it is arbitrable and not unrealistic is incorrect. sent19: if the striper is reputable then that the biter is not a largess and smokes is false. sent20: if something is piezoelectric then it is non-invertible. sent21: that something is a luff and it is athletic is not true if it is not reputable. sent22: if the biter is non-invertible then it is a luff. sent23: the pediment is piezoelectric if the turntable is a kind of non-oligarchic thing that is arbitrable. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent17 -> int1: the striper is non-athletic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the striper is not a largess.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the striper is not athletic and not a largess.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the pediment is unrealistic.; sent8 & sent11 -> int4: that the turntable is a kind of arbitrable thing that is unrealistic is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is arbitrable and it is unrealistic is not right.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the pediment is not unrealistic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the striper is a largess.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: that the biter is both not non-invertible and a largess does not hold.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__