the sack melanizes antispasmodic.
sent1: the fact that something is an aggravation but it does not melanize antispasmodic does not hold if it is not an enormity. sent2: if that the vitalist does not singularize proctorship and it does not repine DPH does not hold the fact that it is not a kind of an aggravation is not incorrect. sent3: that the vitalist does not singularize proctorship and it does not repine DPH is false. sent4: something is not a salutation if it is a kind of a SI and it is a kind of a Bangalore. sent5: the stave does singularize ostracism and is a DMZ. sent6: if the ramie is not a salutation that the stave is an ozone and it is a Bangalore is not right. sent7: if that the antispasmodic is not a SI and is an enormity does not hold the vitalist is not an enormity. sent8: the fact that the antispasmodic is an enormity that is not an aggravation is not right. sent9: something is a Bangalore if it is a DMZ. sent10: the sack is an ozone. sent11: something is a kind of an ozone if it is not a salutation. sent12: the stave is a SI if that the antispasmodic is not a kind of an enormity and is not an aggravation does not hold. sent13: the sack does not melanize antispasmodic but it is an ozone if the fact that the stave is an ozone is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the antispasmodic is not an enormity and it is not an aggravation is incorrect if the fact that the vitalist is not an aggravation is not false.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the vitalist is not a kind of an aggravation.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the antispasmodic is both not an enormity and not an aggravation is incorrect.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the stave is a SI is right.; sent9 -> int4: if the stave is a DMZ then it is a Bangalore.; sent5 -> int5: the stave is a DMZ.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the stave is a Bangalore is right.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the stave is a SI and it is a Bangalore.; sent4 -> int8: if the stave is a kind of a SI and it is a Bangalore then it is not a salutation.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stave is not a salutation.; sent11 -> int10: the fact that if the stave is not the salutation then the stave is an ozone hold.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the stave is an ozone.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: the sack does not melanize antispasmodic but it is a kind of an ozone.; int12 -> hypothesis;
the sack does melanize antispasmodic.
sent1 -> int13: if the vitalist is not a kind of an enormity the fact that it is a kind of an aggravation and does not melanize antispasmodic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the sack melanizes antispasmodic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is an aggravation but it does not melanize antispasmodic does not hold if it is not an enormity. sent2: if that the vitalist does not singularize proctorship and it does not repine DPH does not hold the fact that it is not a kind of an aggravation is not incorrect. sent3: that the vitalist does not singularize proctorship and it does not repine DPH is false. sent4: something is not a salutation if it is a kind of a SI and it is a kind of a Bangalore. sent5: the stave does singularize ostracism and is a DMZ. sent6: if the ramie is not a salutation that the stave is an ozone and it is a Bangalore is not right. sent7: if that the antispasmodic is not a SI and is an enormity does not hold the vitalist is not an enormity. sent8: the fact that the antispasmodic is an enormity that is not an aggravation is not right. sent9: something is a Bangalore if it is a DMZ. sent10: the sack is an ozone. sent11: something is a kind of an ozone if it is not a salutation. sent12: the stave is a SI if that the antispasmodic is not a kind of an enormity and is not an aggravation does not hold. sent13: the sack does not melanize antispasmodic but it is an ozone if the fact that the stave is an ozone is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the antispasmodic is not an enormity and it is not an aggravation is incorrect if the fact that the vitalist is not an aggravation is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the vitalist is not a kind of an aggravation.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the antispasmodic is both not an enormity and not an aggravation is incorrect.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the stave is a SI is right.; sent9 -> int4: if the stave is a DMZ then it is a Bangalore.; sent5 -> int5: the stave is a DMZ.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the stave is a Bangalore is right.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the stave is a SI and it is a Bangalore.; sent4 -> int8: if the stave is a kind of a SI and it is a Bangalore then it is not a salutation.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stave is not a salutation.; sent11 -> int10: the fact that if the stave is not the salutation then the stave is an ozone hold.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the stave is an ozone.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: the sack does not melanize antispasmodic but it is a kind of an ozone.; int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__