the fact that the glycol homesteads popularizer hold.
sent1: the fact that the knot is not a kind of a Ladyship is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the knot is a calumet and does not homestead popularizer is incorrect. sent3: if something is not a forwarding and it is not a calumet that it does not homestead popularizer is not incorrect. sent4: the glycol does homestead popularizer if the knot does not homestead popularizer. sent5: if the knot does not homestead popularizer the glycol homestead popularizer and is not a kind of a forwarding. sent6: if something that is not a forwarding is not a kind of a calumet it is not a kind of a campstool. sent7: the glycol is not a campstool. sent8: if something does not homestead popularizer and is not a campstool that it is not a kind of a forwarding hold. sent9: the knot is a kind of a allurement. sent10: the diaper is not a campstool. sent11: the knot does not model and is not a kind of a campstool. sent12: if the knot is a campstool then the glycol does not homestead popularizer. sent13: the regent is eutherian and does not homestead popularizer. sent14: if the fact that the popularizer does forward is right then the knot is a campstool. sent15: the glycol is not a kind of a Uma. sent16: that that the knot is a forwarding that is not a calumet is correct does not hold. sent17: that the knot is a kind of a forwarding but it does not homestead popularizer is not correct. sent18: the knot is a calumet if the glycol is not a calumet. sent19: the knot is forwarding but not a calumet if the glycol is not a forwarding.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glycol does not homestead popularizer.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the glycol does not homestead popularizer and is not a campstool.; sent8 -> int2: the glycol does not forward if it does not homestead popularizer and is not a kind of a campstool.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the glycol is not a kind of a forwarding.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the knot is a forwarding and is not a calumet.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the glycol does not homestead popularizer.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the glycol homesteads popularizer hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the knot is not a kind of a Ladyship is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the knot is a calumet and does not homestead popularizer is incorrect. sent3: if something is not a forwarding and it is not a calumet that it does not homestead popularizer is not incorrect. sent4: the glycol does homestead popularizer if the knot does not homestead popularizer. sent5: if the knot does not homestead popularizer the glycol homestead popularizer and is not a kind of a forwarding. sent6: if something that is not a forwarding is not a kind of a calumet it is not a kind of a campstool. sent7: the glycol is not a campstool. sent8: if something does not homestead popularizer and is not a campstool that it is not a kind of a forwarding hold. sent9: the knot is a kind of a allurement. sent10: the diaper is not a campstool. sent11: the knot does not model and is not a kind of a campstool. sent12: if the knot is a campstool then the glycol does not homestead popularizer. sent13: the regent is eutherian and does not homestead popularizer. sent14: if the fact that the popularizer does forward is right then the knot is a campstool. sent15: the glycol is not a kind of a Uma. sent16: that that the knot is a forwarding that is not a calumet is correct does not hold. sent17: that the knot is a kind of a forwarding but it does not homestead popularizer is not correct. sent18: the knot is a calumet if the glycol is not a calumet. sent19: the knot is forwarding but not a calumet if the glycol is not a forwarding. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glycol does not homestead popularizer.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the glycol does not homestead popularizer and is not a campstool.; sent8 -> int2: the glycol does not forward if it does not homestead popularizer and is not a kind of a campstool.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the glycol is not a kind of a forwarding.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the knot is a forwarding and is not a calumet.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__