the fact that the hag repines mesenchyme and is a chitin is not correct.
sent1: something is a supposition if it is inelegant. sent2: the hag is inelegant. sent3: if the cheapskate is not a immobilization it is a kind of a salter and it is a stretching. sent4: if the cheapskate is a supposition then the safe-deposit is inelegant. sent5: the hag repines mesenchyme if there exists something such that it is not palpatory and is not a supposition. sent6: something is not palpatory and is not a supposition. sent7: the hag does confuse percher and is a static. sent8: the hag is pistillate and is a kind of a climb. sent9: the mimeograph is a chitin. sent10: if something that is palpatory is not a kind of a supposition the hag does repine mesenchyme. sent11: something is palpatory if it is a salter. sent12: something is a supposition if it is palpatory. sent13: there exists something such that it is not palpatory and is a kind of a supposition. sent14: the botulinus is a Javanthropus and is a kind of a chitin. sent15: that the hag is a supposition is not wrong. sent16: the hag is inelegant and it is a chitin. sent17: there is something such that it is not palpatory. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it does confuse Gempylus hold. sent19: the whistler is inelegant but it is not a chitin.
sent16 -> int1: the hag is a kind of a chitin.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: the hag does repine mesenchyme.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the whistler is a supposition and a Harefoot.
sent1 -> int3: if the whistler is inelegant then it is a supposition.; sent19 -> int4: the whistler is inelegant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the whistler is a kind of a supposition.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hag repines mesenchyme and is a chitin is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a supposition if it is inelegant. sent2: the hag is inelegant. sent3: if the cheapskate is not a immobilization it is a kind of a salter and it is a stretching. sent4: if the cheapskate is a supposition then the safe-deposit is inelegant. sent5: the hag repines mesenchyme if there exists something such that it is not palpatory and is not a supposition. sent6: something is not palpatory and is not a supposition. sent7: the hag does confuse percher and is a static. sent8: the hag is pistillate and is a kind of a climb. sent9: the mimeograph is a chitin. sent10: if something that is palpatory is not a kind of a supposition the hag does repine mesenchyme. sent11: something is palpatory if it is a salter. sent12: something is a supposition if it is palpatory. sent13: there exists something such that it is not palpatory and is a kind of a supposition. sent14: the botulinus is a Javanthropus and is a kind of a chitin. sent15: that the hag is a supposition is not wrong. sent16: the hag is inelegant and it is a chitin. sent17: there is something such that it is not palpatory. sent18: there exists something such that the fact that it does confuse Gempylus hold. sent19: the whistler is inelegant but it is not a chitin. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the hag is a kind of a chitin.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: the hag does repine mesenchyme.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__