that the ozonide is Peloponnesian is right.
sent1: if the nephew is Peloponnesian and is not a laureled then the ozonide is not Peloponnesian. sent2: the florilegium is a kind of a electrograph and does not embark if the nephew is a electrograph. sent3: something is not a kind of a IDF if it is a Bowery and it does not abjure columbium. sent4: the nephew is Peloponnesian but it is not a laureled if the electrotherapist is a kind of a electrograph. sent5: the antiredeposition is not unfavorable. sent6: the antiredeposition is a IDF if the electrotherapist is not a kind of a laureled. sent7: the electrotherapist does not embark if the fact that the antiredeposition is a kind of a Bowery that does not abjure columbium is incorrect. sent8: the electrotherapist is not a laureled if the nephew is not a electrograph. sent9: the antiredeposition is a Bowery but it does not abjure columbium if it is not unfavorable. sent10: the nephew is not unfavorable. sent11: the electrotherapist does abjure columbium. sent12: something that does not embark is a electrograph and a IDF.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nephew is not a electrograph.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the electrotherapist is not a kind of a laureled.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the antiredeposition is a IDF.; sent3 -> int3: if the antiredeposition is a Bowery but it does not abjure columbium it is not a IDF.; sent9 & sent5 -> int4: the antiredeposition is a Bowery that does not abjure columbium.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the antiredeposition is not a IDF.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the nephew is a electrograph.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the florilegium is a kind of a electrograph and does not embark.;
the ozonide is not Peloponnesian.
sent12 -> int9: the electrotherapist is a electrograph and a IDF if it does not embark.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ozonide is Peloponnesian is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nephew is Peloponnesian and is not a laureled then the ozonide is not Peloponnesian. sent2: the florilegium is a kind of a electrograph and does not embark if the nephew is a electrograph. sent3: something is not a kind of a IDF if it is a Bowery and it does not abjure columbium. sent4: the nephew is Peloponnesian but it is not a laureled if the electrotherapist is a kind of a electrograph. sent5: the antiredeposition is not unfavorable. sent6: the antiredeposition is a IDF if the electrotherapist is not a kind of a laureled. sent7: the electrotherapist does not embark if the fact that the antiredeposition is a kind of a Bowery that does not abjure columbium is incorrect. sent8: the electrotherapist is not a laureled if the nephew is not a electrograph. sent9: the antiredeposition is a Bowery but it does not abjure columbium if it is not unfavorable. sent10: the nephew is not unfavorable. sent11: the electrotherapist does abjure columbium. sent12: something that does not embark is a electrograph and a IDF. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nephew is not a electrograph.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the electrotherapist is not a kind of a laureled.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the antiredeposition is a IDF.; sent3 -> int3: if the antiredeposition is a Bowery but it does not abjure columbium it is not a IDF.; sent9 & sent5 -> int4: the antiredeposition is a Bowery that does not abjure columbium.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the antiredeposition is not a IDF.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the nephew is a electrograph.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the florilegium is a kind of a electrograph and does not embark.; __UNKNOWN__