the limiter is a kind of non-beneficent thing that is not a cookout.
sent1: the fact that the prostate is not a kind of a costermonger hold. sent2: the sweeper is not a cookout. sent3: if the victim brooches Suharto but it does not suckle then the stout is not shamanist. sent4: something that is not a costermonger and/or is not a kind of a IDF does not direct Ruritanian. sent5: if the prostate is not a costermonger then the fact that it diminishes genie and does back does not hold. sent6: the sweeper is both not unreliable and not shamanist if the stout is not shamanist. sent7: if something is not a kind of a IDF the victim does brooch Suharto but it does not suckle. sent8: the forte is not a IDF if there is something such that the fact that it does diminish genie and does back is incorrect. sent9: if something does not brooch Suharto the fact that it is a IDF and/or is not a costermonger hold. sent10: if something that is not unreliable is non-shamanist then it does not direct Ruritanian. sent11: that something is not beneficent and it is not a cookout is incorrect if it is not a costermonger.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the prostate diminishes genie and it is a back does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it diminishes genie and is not non-back is not right.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the forte is not a IDF.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is not a IDF.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the victim brooches Suharto and does not suckle.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the stout is not shamanist.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the sweeper is not unreliable and is not shamanist.; sent10 -> int8: the sweeper does not direct Ruritanian if it is not unreliable and it is not shamanist.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the sweeper does not direct Ruritanian.;
the limiter does not direct Ruritanian.
sent4 -> int10: if the limiter is either not a costermonger or not a IDF or both then it does not direct Ruritanian.;
$hypothesis$ = the limiter is a kind of non-beneficent thing that is not a cookout. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the prostate is not a kind of a costermonger hold. sent2: the sweeper is not a cookout. sent3: if the victim brooches Suharto but it does not suckle then the stout is not shamanist. sent4: something that is not a costermonger and/or is not a kind of a IDF does not direct Ruritanian. sent5: if the prostate is not a costermonger then the fact that it diminishes genie and does back does not hold. sent6: the sweeper is both not unreliable and not shamanist if the stout is not shamanist. sent7: if something is not a kind of a IDF the victim does brooch Suharto but it does not suckle. sent8: the forte is not a IDF if there is something such that the fact that it does diminish genie and does back is incorrect. sent9: if something does not brooch Suharto the fact that it is a IDF and/or is not a costermonger hold. sent10: if something that is not unreliable is non-shamanist then it does not direct Ruritanian. sent11: that something is not beneficent and it is not a cookout is incorrect if it is not a costermonger. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the prostate diminishes genie and it is a back does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it diminishes genie and is not non-back is not right.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the forte is not a IDF.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is not a IDF.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the victim brooches Suharto and does not suckle.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the stout is not shamanist.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the sweeper is not unreliable and is not shamanist.; sent10 -> int8: the sweeper does not direct Ruritanian if it is not unreliable and it is not shamanist.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the sweeper does not direct Ruritanian.; __UNKNOWN__