that the Buck does not liquefy affectionateness and does not paste hold.
sent1: there is something such that it does not liquefy bleached. sent2: the firelighter is a mineralogy if something does not liquefy bleached. sent3: if there exists something such that it does not liquefy bleached then the firelighter liquefies affectionateness and it is a mineralogy. sent4: that the Buck does not liquefy affectionateness and is not a paste is incorrect if the firelighter does liquefy affectionateness.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the firelighter does liquefy affectionateness and it is a kind of a mineralogy.; int1 -> int2: the firelighter liquefies affectionateness.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Buck does not liquefy affectionateness and does not paste hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does not liquefy bleached. sent2: the firelighter is a mineralogy if something does not liquefy bleached. sent3: if there exists something such that it does not liquefy bleached then the firelighter liquefies affectionateness and it is a mineralogy. sent4: that the Buck does not liquefy affectionateness and is not a paste is incorrect if the firelighter does liquefy affectionateness. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the firelighter does liquefy affectionateness and it is a kind of a mineralogy.; int1 -> int2: the firelighter liquefies affectionateness.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__