the spongefly is not continental.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is both basiscopic and not an intake then the pinger rebuilds. sent2: there exists something such that it is basiscopic and is not an intake. sent3: if an inalienable thing does rebuild it is not an onset. sent4: if the talcum does not investigate Lunda and it is not a scrutineer then that the dejection is not a scrutineer is correct. sent5: if the fact that something is not a scrutineer and it is not stomatous is not correct it is a scrutineer. sent6: something that does diffuse friendlessness and/or is non-stomatous is not non-stomatous. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Orchestia and it is not inalienable is not true then the pinger is inalienable. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Orchestia and it is not inalienable is not right. sent9: the Signora is continental. sent10: if the fact that the sculptor is a beehive and it diffuses friendlessness does not hold it does not investigate Lunda. sent11: that the spongefly is not pyrographic and does not abandon testament is not true if the dejection is not a scrutineer. sent12: if something is a beehive it does diffuse friendlessness and/or it is not stomatous. sent13: the sculptor is a kind of a beehive and it is a bluecoat if the pinger is not an onset. sent14: if the fact that the have does not abandon testament is correct then it is continental and is pyrographic. sent15: if the sculptor does not investigate Lunda then the fact that the talcum is both not a scrutineer and not stomatous does not hold. sent16: if the sculptor is not stomatous then the talcum does not investigate Lunda and is not a scrutineer. sent17: the map is continental. sent18: the spongefly is continental.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
the archespore is continental.
sent6 -> int1: that the sculptor is not stomatous hold if it diffuses friendlessness and/or is not stomatous.; sent12 -> int2: if the sculptor is a kind of a beehive then it does diffuse friendlessness and/or it is not stomatous.; sent3 -> int3: if the pinger is inalienable and rebuilds then it is not an onset.; sent8 & sent7 -> int4: the pinger is inalienable.; sent2 & sent1 -> int5: the pinger rebuilds.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pinger is inalienable thing that does rebuild.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the pinger is not an onset is not wrong.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the sculptor is a kind of a beehive and it is a kind of a bluecoat.; int8 -> int9: the sculptor is a beehive.; int2 & int9 -> int10: the sculptor diffuses friendlessness and/or it is not stomatous.; int1 & int10 -> int11: the sculptor is not stomatous.; sent16 & int11 -> int12: the talcum does not investigate Lunda and is not a scrutineer.; sent4 & int12 -> int13: the dejection is not a scrutineer.; sent11 & int13 -> int14: that that the spongefly is non-pyrographic thing that does not abandon testament is not incorrect does not hold.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-pyrographic thing that does not abandon testament is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the spongefly is not continental. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is both basiscopic and not an intake then the pinger rebuilds. sent2: there exists something such that it is basiscopic and is not an intake. sent3: if an inalienable thing does rebuild it is not an onset. sent4: if the talcum does not investigate Lunda and it is not a scrutineer then that the dejection is not a scrutineer is correct. sent5: if the fact that something is not a scrutineer and it is not stomatous is not correct it is a scrutineer. sent6: something that does diffuse friendlessness and/or is non-stomatous is not non-stomatous. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Orchestia and it is not inalienable is not true then the pinger is inalienable. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Orchestia and it is not inalienable is not right. sent9: the Signora is continental. sent10: if the fact that the sculptor is a beehive and it diffuses friendlessness does not hold it does not investigate Lunda. sent11: that the spongefly is not pyrographic and does not abandon testament is not true if the dejection is not a scrutineer. sent12: if something is a beehive it does diffuse friendlessness and/or it is not stomatous. sent13: the sculptor is a kind of a beehive and it is a bluecoat if the pinger is not an onset. sent14: if the fact that the have does not abandon testament is correct then it is continental and is pyrographic. sent15: if the sculptor does not investigate Lunda then the fact that the talcum is both not a scrutineer and not stomatous does not hold. sent16: if the sculptor is not stomatous then the talcum does not investigate Lunda and is not a scrutineer. sent17: the map is continental. sent18: the spongefly is continental. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__