the succinicness happens.
sent1: if the ringing does not occur then both the tetravalentness and the drollery happens. sent2: if the drollery does not occur both the Bosnianness and the tetravalentness happens. sent3: either that the rings does not occur or that the blockage does not occur or both is caused by the non-umbelliformness. sent4: that the succinicness occurs and the experientialness occurs is triggered by that the dancing GSA does not occur. sent5: the drollery does not occur if the blockage does not occur. sent6: the umbelliformness does not occur. sent7: both the experientialness and the dancing GSA occurs. sent8: if the experientialness happens the seeling happens. sent9: that the Bosnianness does not occur and the seeling does not occur is not true if the tetravalentness occurs. sent10: the drollery does not occur if the rings does not occur. sent11: if the succinicness and the seeling occurs then the Bosnianness does not occur.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the experientialness happens is correct.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the seeling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the succinicness happens is true.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the succinicness and the seeling occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the Bosnianness does not occur.; sent3 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that either the rings does not occur or the blockage does not occur or both is not incorrect.; int5 & sent10 & sent5 -> int6: the drollery does not occur.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the Bosnianness happens and the tetravalentness happens.; int7 -> int8: the Bosnianness occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the succinicness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the succinicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ringing does not occur then both the tetravalentness and the drollery happens. sent2: if the drollery does not occur both the Bosnianness and the tetravalentness happens. sent3: either that the rings does not occur or that the blockage does not occur or both is caused by the non-umbelliformness. sent4: that the succinicness occurs and the experientialness occurs is triggered by that the dancing GSA does not occur. sent5: the drollery does not occur if the blockage does not occur. sent6: the umbelliformness does not occur. sent7: both the experientialness and the dancing GSA occurs. sent8: if the experientialness happens the seeling happens. sent9: that the Bosnianness does not occur and the seeling does not occur is not true if the tetravalentness occurs. sent10: the drollery does not occur if the rings does not occur. sent11: if the succinicness and the seeling occurs then the Bosnianness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the experientialness happens is correct.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the seeling happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the succinicness happens is true.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the succinicness and the seeling occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the Bosnianness does not occur.; sent3 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that either the rings does not occur or the blockage does not occur or both is not incorrect.; int5 & sent10 & sent5 -> int6: the drollery does not occur.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the Bosnianness happens and the tetravalentness happens.; int7 -> int8: the Bosnianness occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__