not the hijab but the uncriticalness occurs if the bisexualness does not occur.
sent1: the bisexualness happens if the file happens. sent2: that both the non-epistemicness and the non-sympatricness occurs is not true if the sedimenting rugulah occurs. sent3: that the instroke does not occur is prevented by that not the hijab but the uncriticalness happens. sent4: the self-renewal does not occur. sent5: that the hijab does not occur is caused by the non-bisexualness. sent6: the hijab prevents that the instroke does not occur. sent7: the fact that the hijab and the uncriticalness happens does not hold. sent8: the instroke prevents that the filing does not occur. sent9: that the bisexualness happens results in that the hijab does not occur but the uncriticalness happens. sent10: the hijab does not occur. sent11: the sedimenting rugulah occurs if the fact that the bryophyticness occurs is not incorrect. sent12: that the solicitorship happens but the noncriticalness does not occur brings about that the inlandness happens. sent13: if the fact that the hijab does not occur but the uncriticalness occurs is not true then the instroke occurs. sent14: that both the non-crustaceousness and the bisexualness happens is false if the allness happens. sent15: the bryophyticness happens. sent16: the magic does not occur if the fact that the non-epistemicness and the non-sympatricness happens is not true. sent17: if the inlandness happens the allness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hijab does not occur but the uncriticalness occurs does not hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: that the instroke occurs hold.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the file occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the bisexual occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bisexual does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the hijab does not occur but the uncriticalness occurs.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the magic does not occur but the conflagration occurs.
sent11 & sent15 -> int6: the sedimenting rugulah happens.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: that the epistemicness does not occur and the sympatricness does not occur is not true.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the magic does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = not the hijab but the uncriticalness occurs if the bisexualness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the bisexualness happens if the file happens. sent2: that both the non-epistemicness and the non-sympatricness occurs is not true if the sedimenting rugulah occurs. sent3: that the instroke does not occur is prevented by that not the hijab but the uncriticalness happens. sent4: the self-renewal does not occur. sent5: that the hijab does not occur is caused by the non-bisexualness. sent6: the hijab prevents that the instroke does not occur. sent7: the fact that the hijab and the uncriticalness happens does not hold. sent8: the instroke prevents that the filing does not occur. sent9: that the bisexualness happens results in that the hijab does not occur but the uncriticalness happens. sent10: the hijab does not occur. sent11: the sedimenting rugulah occurs if the fact that the bryophyticness occurs is not incorrect. sent12: that the solicitorship happens but the noncriticalness does not occur brings about that the inlandness happens. sent13: if the fact that the hijab does not occur but the uncriticalness occurs is not true then the instroke occurs. sent14: that both the non-crustaceousness and the bisexualness happens is false if the allness happens. sent15: the bryophyticness happens. sent16: the magic does not occur if the fact that the non-epistemicness and the non-sympatricness happens is not true. sent17: if the inlandness happens the allness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hijab does not occur but the uncriticalness occurs does not hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: that the instroke occurs hold.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the file occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the bisexual occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bisexual does not occur.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the hijab does not occur but the uncriticalness occurs.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__