the unwrapping herbalist does not occur.
sent1: if the investigating happens the setting does not occur. sent2: the fact that that the impersonating Kera does not occur and the hypnotherapy does not occur is not correct if the bubbling choking occurs is not incorrect. sent3: the setting does not occur and the investigating occurs if the noninfectiousness happens. sent4: both the fastness and the bubbling choking happens. sent5: if the fact that not the unwrapping herbalist but the impersonating final occurs is not right then the occipitalness occurs. sent6: the investigating occurs. sent7: if the investigating occurs the setting does not occur but the impersonating final occurs. sent8: that the impersonating final does not occur is caused by that the healthcare does not occur. sent9: the setting does not occur if the fact that the investigating does not occur and the noninfectiousness does not occur is not correct. sent10: the non-chirpiness and the overtaking occurs. sent11: that both the noninfectiousness and the spieling macule happens is caused by that the algorithmicness does not occur. sent12: if that the healthcare and the dicarboxylicness happens is not right the impersonating final does not occur. sent13: the mooning and the abrasion occurs if the cash-and-carriness does not occur. sent14: the setting does not occur. sent15: not the webbing but the centerness happens if the moon happens. sent16: that if that the web does not occur is true then either the therapy or the spieling TLC or both occurs is right. sent17: the fact that if the unwrapping herbalist does not occur then that the healthcare and the dicarboxylicness occurs does not hold is not incorrect. sent18: the cash-and-carriness does not occur if that the impersonating Kera does not occur and the hypnotherapy does not occur is not true. sent19: the algorithmicness does not occur if that the therapy occurs hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unwrapping herbalist does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that both the healthcare and the dicarboxylicness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the impersonating final does not occur.; sent7 & sent6 -> int3: not the setting but the impersonating final occurs.; int3 -> int4: the impersonating final occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the unwrapping herbalist does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the unwrapping herbalist does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the investigating happens the setting does not occur. sent2: the fact that that the impersonating Kera does not occur and the hypnotherapy does not occur is not correct if the bubbling choking occurs is not incorrect. sent3: the setting does not occur and the investigating occurs if the noninfectiousness happens. sent4: both the fastness and the bubbling choking happens. sent5: if the fact that not the unwrapping herbalist but the impersonating final occurs is not right then the occipitalness occurs. sent6: the investigating occurs. sent7: if the investigating occurs the setting does not occur but the impersonating final occurs. sent8: that the impersonating final does not occur is caused by that the healthcare does not occur. sent9: the setting does not occur if the fact that the investigating does not occur and the noninfectiousness does not occur is not correct. sent10: the non-chirpiness and the overtaking occurs. sent11: that both the noninfectiousness and the spieling macule happens is caused by that the algorithmicness does not occur. sent12: if that the healthcare and the dicarboxylicness happens is not right the impersonating final does not occur. sent13: the mooning and the abrasion occurs if the cash-and-carriness does not occur. sent14: the setting does not occur. sent15: not the webbing but the centerness happens if the moon happens. sent16: that if that the web does not occur is true then either the therapy or the spieling TLC or both occurs is right. sent17: the fact that if the unwrapping herbalist does not occur then that the healthcare and the dicarboxylicness occurs does not hold is not incorrect. sent18: the cash-and-carriness does not occur if that the impersonating Kera does not occur and the hypnotherapy does not occur is not true. sent19: the algorithmicness does not occur if that the therapy occurs hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unwrapping herbalist does not occur.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that both the healthcare and the dicarboxylicness occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the impersonating final does not occur.; sent7 & sent6 -> int3: not the setting but the impersonating final occurs.; int3 -> int4: the impersonating final occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__