that the third is both not a clypeus and a goad is false.
sent1: the fact that the third is both a clypeus and a goad is not correct if it does truck redbird. sent2: something does not acclimatize if it does not acclimatize and/or is not immunological. sent3: if the fact that the sealer does not camber principality and is not a shoeful is false the third does truck attitude. sent4: the fact that something does truck redbird hold if it does truck attitude. sent5: if something is not improvident the fact that it does not camber principality and is not a kind of a shoeful is incorrect. sent6: the sealer is not improvident if it cambers hilliness and it does acclimatize. sent7: the fact that the sealer does not camber principality and is a shoeful is false if it is not improvident. sent8: the fact that the burgomaster trucks redbird is not incorrect if something that acclimatizes does camber hilliness. sent9: if something is not improvident then that it cambers principality and is not a shoeful is wrong. sent10: the fact that the third is a clypeus and is a kind of a goad is not true. sent11: the sealer cambers hilliness and it does acclimatize. sent12: the fact that something does not camber principality but it is a kind of a shoeful is false if it is not improvident. sent13: the fact that something is a clypeus and it does goad does not hold if it trucks redbird. sent14: the sealer does acclimatize. sent15: if the sealer is not improvident then the fact that it cambers principality and it is not a kind of a shoeful is not correct. sent16: the fact that something is not a pinch and is a Chichewa is wrong if it is bismuthic. sent17: the plughole cambers hilliness. sent18: the plughole does acclimatize. sent19: if the jerky does not acclimatize it is a clypeus and it goads. sent20: the jerky does not acclimatize or it is not immunological or both. sent21: that something is not a kind of a clypeus but it is a kind of a goad is not correct if it does truck redbird.
sent5 -> int1: if the sealer is not improvident then the fact that it does not camber principality and is not a shoeful is not right.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the sealer is not improvident.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the sealer does not camber principality and is not a kind of a shoeful does not hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the third does truck attitude.; sent4 -> int5: the third trucks redbird if it trucks attitude.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the third trucks redbird.; sent21 -> int7: if that the third does truck redbird is not incorrect the fact that it is both not a clypeus and a goad does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the third is both not a clypeus and a goad.
sent18 & sent17 -> int8: the plughole does acclimatize and it does camber hilliness.; int8 -> int9: something acclimatizes and it does camber hilliness.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the burgomaster does truck redbird.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it trucks redbird.;
$hypothesis$ = that the third is both not a clypeus and a goad is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the third is both a clypeus and a goad is not correct if it does truck redbird. sent2: something does not acclimatize if it does not acclimatize and/or is not immunological. sent3: if the fact that the sealer does not camber principality and is not a shoeful is false the third does truck attitude. sent4: the fact that something does truck redbird hold if it does truck attitude. sent5: if something is not improvident the fact that it does not camber principality and is not a kind of a shoeful is incorrect. sent6: the sealer is not improvident if it cambers hilliness and it does acclimatize. sent7: the fact that the sealer does not camber principality and is a shoeful is false if it is not improvident. sent8: the fact that the burgomaster trucks redbird is not incorrect if something that acclimatizes does camber hilliness. sent9: if something is not improvident then that it cambers principality and is not a shoeful is wrong. sent10: the fact that the third is a clypeus and is a kind of a goad is not true. sent11: the sealer cambers hilliness and it does acclimatize. sent12: the fact that something does not camber principality but it is a kind of a shoeful is false if it is not improvident. sent13: the fact that something is a clypeus and it does goad does not hold if it trucks redbird. sent14: the sealer does acclimatize. sent15: if the sealer is not improvident then the fact that it cambers principality and it is not a kind of a shoeful is not correct. sent16: the fact that something is not a pinch and is a Chichewa is wrong if it is bismuthic. sent17: the plughole cambers hilliness. sent18: the plughole does acclimatize. sent19: if the jerky does not acclimatize it is a clypeus and it goads. sent20: the jerky does not acclimatize or it is not immunological or both. sent21: that something is not a kind of a clypeus but it is a kind of a goad is not correct if it does truck redbird. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the sealer is not improvident then the fact that it does not camber principality and is not a shoeful is not right.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the sealer is not improvident.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the sealer does not camber principality and is not a kind of a shoeful does not hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the third does truck attitude.; sent4 -> int5: the third trucks redbird if it trucks attitude.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the third trucks redbird.; sent21 -> int7: if that the third does truck redbird is not incorrect the fact that it is both not a clypeus and a goad does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__