the fact that there exists something such that if that either it is not zygomatic or it crusts divot or both is wrong it is arundinaceous does not hold.
sent1: the songwriter is a minefield if that it is not an armiger and/or it plasticizes does not hold. sent2: if that something is not arundinaceous and/or it is apothecial is not right it is a taxability. sent3: if that the rooting is not appetitive or forecasts Nipa or both does not hold it is zygomatic. sent4: the fact that the rooting is arundinaceous if that either the rooting is zygomatic or it crusts divot or both does not hold is right. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that either it does not crust quantity or it is a watercress or both is not correct it is haploid. sent6: there is something such that if that it is not a revoke and/or it is a thirteenth does not hold it is a heartleaf. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is zygomatic and/or does crust divot is incorrect it is not non-arundinaceous. sent8: the rooting is zygomatic if that it is not a Spaniard and/or it is a launcher is false. sent9: there is something such that if that it is not photometric and/or is a Sufi does not hold then it forecasts buccula. sent10: if either the rooting is not zygomatic or it does crust divot or both it is arundinaceous. sent11: there is something such that if that it either is not a fastener or is invertible or both is not right it is autogenetic. sent12: the rooting is a kind of a fastener if the fact that it is not a Spaniard and/or it is zygomatic does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it either is not zygomatic or crusts divot or both then it is arundinaceous. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not crust Melocactus or does compensate speculator or both is not correct it does crust mawkishness. sent15: if that that the temp is not zygomatic and/or it does crust vagus is not false does not hold then it is a paraplegic. sent16: the rooting is arundinaceous if the fact that it either is not zygomatic or does crust divot or both is wrong.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
if that the rooting is non-arundinaceous and/or not non-apothecial is not right then it is a taxability.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that either it is not zygomatic or it crusts divot or both is wrong it is arundinaceous does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the songwriter is a minefield if that it is not an armiger and/or it plasticizes does not hold. sent2: if that something is not arundinaceous and/or it is apothecial is not right it is a taxability. sent3: if that the rooting is not appetitive or forecasts Nipa or both does not hold it is zygomatic. sent4: the fact that the rooting is arundinaceous if that either the rooting is zygomatic or it crusts divot or both does not hold is right. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that either it does not crust quantity or it is a watercress or both is not correct it is haploid. sent6: there is something such that if that it is not a revoke and/or it is a thirteenth does not hold it is a heartleaf. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is zygomatic and/or does crust divot is incorrect it is not non-arundinaceous. sent8: the rooting is zygomatic if that it is not a Spaniard and/or it is a launcher is false. sent9: there is something such that if that it is not photometric and/or is a Sufi does not hold then it forecasts buccula. sent10: if either the rooting is not zygomatic or it does crust divot or both it is arundinaceous. sent11: there is something such that if that it either is not a fastener or is invertible or both is not right it is autogenetic. sent12: the rooting is a kind of a fastener if the fact that it is not a Spaniard and/or it is zygomatic does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it either is not zygomatic or crusts divot or both then it is arundinaceous. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not crust Melocactus or does compensate speculator or both is not correct it does crust mawkishness. sent15: if that that the temp is not zygomatic and/or it does crust vagus is not false does not hold then it is a paraplegic. sent16: the rooting is arundinaceous if the fact that it either is not zygomatic or does crust divot or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__