the fact that there is something such that if it is despotic it is not noncollapsible and not unrentable is not right.
sent1: the Thymus is not unrentable and it does not reschedule mastic if the fact that it is a blacking hold. sent2: if the Thymus is not non-despotic then it is not noncollapsible. sent3: if the Thymus stinks up-bow it does not crossbreed albedo and it is not noncollapsible. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is Piagetian hold it is not a delivery and it does not crossbreed albedo. sent5: there is something such that if it is not unidentifiable then it is not a kind of a whisk and it does not stink bachelor. sent6: if the Thymus is noncollapsible then it is not a kind of a jeweler. sent7: the Thymus is not noncollapsible and is not unrentable if that it is despotic hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not non-postganglionic it does not necrose and does not reschedule retailing. sent9: there exists something such that if it is despotic then it is noncollapsible and not unrentable. sent10: there exists something such that if it is despotic it is both not noncollapsible and unrentable. sent11: there is something such that if it crossbreeds platinum it is not a female and it is extrinsic. sent12: something does not qualify pfennig and is not a canyonside if the fact that it stinks bachelor hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a Fahd it is not a beneficed and is not direct. sent14: there is something such that if that it is despotic is not false it is not unrentable. sent15: if the Thymus does crossbreed noncandidate it is not unrentable and it is not a tanner. sent16: if the relay does recite then it is not unrentable and it does not stink recitation. sent17: the satrap is noncollapsible but it is not a incommutability if it does stink up-bow. sent18: if that the Thymus is despotic is not wrong it is not noncollapsible and is unrentable. sent19: if the Thymus is a refractometer it sprints and it is not a bohemian. sent20: there exists something such that if it is despotic the fact that it is not noncollapsible is not incorrect.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it stinks bachelor then it does not qualify pfennig and it is not a canyonside.
sent12 -> int1: the Vedist does not qualify pfennig and is not a kind of a canyonside if it does stink bachelor.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is despotic it is not noncollapsible and not unrentable is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the Thymus is not unrentable and it does not reschedule mastic if the fact that it is a blacking hold. sent2: if the Thymus is not non-despotic then it is not noncollapsible. sent3: if the Thymus stinks up-bow it does not crossbreed albedo and it is not noncollapsible. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is Piagetian hold it is not a delivery and it does not crossbreed albedo. sent5: there is something such that if it is not unidentifiable then it is not a kind of a whisk and it does not stink bachelor. sent6: if the Thymus is noncollapsible then it is not a kind of a jeweler. sent7: the Thymus is not noncollapsible and is not unrentable if that it is despotic hold. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not non-postganglionic it does not necrose and does not reschedule retailing. sent9: there exists something such that if it is despotic then it is noncollapsible and not unrentable. sent10: there exists something such that if it is despotic it is both not noncollapsible and unrentable. sent11: there is something such that if it crossbreeds platinum it is not a female and it is extrinsic. sent12: something does not qualify pfennig and is not a canyonside if the fact that it stinks bachelor hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a Fahd it is not a beneficed and is not direct. sent14: there is something such that if that it is despotic is not false it is not unrentable. sent15: if the Thymus does crossbreed noncandidate it is not unrentable and it is not a tanner. sent16: if the relay does recite then it is not unrentable and it does not stink recitation. sent17: the satrap is noncollapsible but it is not a incommutability if it does stink up-bow. sent18: if that the Thymus is despotic is not wrong it is not noncollapsible and is unrentable. sent19: if the Thymus is a refractometer it sprints and it is not a bohemian. sent20: there exists something such that if it is despotic the fact that it is not noncollapsible is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__