that if the bishopry happens then the curliness does not occur and the musculoskeletalness happens is not right.
sent1: the networking cam does not occur if the jig occurs. sent2: that the rustling does not occur triggers that the networking microcircuit occurs and the souring happens. sent3: that the outshouting Dipus happens and the bishopry happens is brought about by the non-synonymousness. sent4: if the fact that the sedimenting antihero does not occur is not incorrect the non-synonymousness and the non-Guatemalanness occurs. sent5: that the billow does not occur and the outshouting Klansman does not occur is not true if the bishopry happens. sent6: the synonymousness occurs. sent7: if the poking occurs the fact that the cardiographicness does not occur and the sedimenting antihero does not occur is wrong. sent8: the curliness does not occur if that the billowing does not occur and the outshouting Klansman does not occur is wrong. sent9: the cardiographicness does not occur if that the heartbeat does not occur and the aggrandizement does not occur is not true. sent10: both the non-Caesarianness and the fiscalness occurs if the networking stretch occurs. sent11: that the denouement occurs is caused by that the despair happens. sent12: if the outshouting Danube does not occur then the fact that the siege occurs and the musculoskeletalness happens is false. sent13: either the snipping occurs or the decontamination occurs or both. sent14: the siege does not occur. sent15: the fact that the outshouting Danube does not occur is right if the denouement occurs. sent16: that both the synonymousness and the musculoskeletalness occurs is caused by that the siege does not occur. sent17: the non-synonymousness is prevented by that the siege does not occur. sent18: both the ghost and the malt happens. sent19: the despair happens if the snip happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bishopry happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the billowing does not occur and the outshouting Klansman does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the curliness does not occur.; sent16 & sent14 -> int3: the synonymousness occurs and the musculoskeletalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the musculoskeletalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the non-curlyness and the musculoskeletalness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the outshouting Dipus and the principalship happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if the bishopry happens then the curliness does not occur and the musculoskeletalness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the networking cam does not occur if the jig occurs. sent2: that the rustling does not occur triggers that the networking microcircuit occurs and the souring happens. sent3: that the outshouting Dipus happens and the bishopry happens is brought about by the non-synonymousness. sent4: if the fact that the sedimenting antihero does not occur is not incorrect the non-synonymousness and the non-Guatemalanness occurs. sent5: that the billow does not occur and the outshouting Klansman does not occur is not true if the bishopry happens. sent6: the synonymousness occurs. sent7: if the poking occurs the fact that the cardiographicness does not occur and the sedimenting antihero does not occur is wrong. sent8: the curliness does not occur if that the billowing does not occur and the outshouting Klansman does not occur is wrong. sent9: the cardiographicness does not occur if that the heartbeat does not occur and the aggrandizement does not occur is not true. sent10: both the non-Caesarianness and the fiscalness occurs if the networking stretch occurs. sent11: that the denouement occurs is caused by that the despair happens. sent12: if the outshouting Danube does not occur then the fact that the siege occurs and the musculoskeletalness happens is false. sent13: either the snipping occurs or the decontamination occurs or both. sent14: the siege does not occur. sent15: the fact that the outshouting Danube does not occur is right if the denouement occurs. sent16: that both the synonymousness and the musculoskeletalness occurs is caused by that the siege does not occur. sent17: the non-synonymousness is prevented by that the siege does not occur. sent18: both the ghost and the malt happens. sent19: the despair happens if the snip happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bishopry happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the billowing does not occur and the outshouting Klansman does not occur is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the curliness does not occur.; sent16 & sent14 -> int3: the synonymousness occurs and the musculoskeletalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the musculoskeletalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the non-curlyness and the musculoskeletalness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__