the fact that there is something such that it is not a kind of a luge and it is not a kind of a abidance is incorrect.
sent1: the molding is non-hieratic if the erythroblast is a abidance. sent2: the fact that something does not expire sirenian and is not a involution is not correct if it is not anarchistic. sent3: the erythroblast is a hieratic. sent4: the fact that the erythroblast is not a luge is right. sent5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a tetrode and it does not retrograde. sent6: if the erythroblast is not a abidance then the groom is not a dasyure. sent7: the molding is not a abidance if the fact that that the erythroblast does not expire sirenian and is not a involution is wrong is correct. sent8: if the molding is not a abidance then the groom is both not a luge and not a abidance. sent9: the molding does expire sirenian. sent10: the fact that if the molding is not anarchistic then the fact that the molding is a kind of a abidance but it is not a hieratic is incorrect is correct. sent11: if something that does broadside prate does drawl it is not incongruous. sent12: if something is a kind of a hieratic and it is a dasyure then it is not anarchistic. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a brag and it is not a tetrode. sent14: the fact that the erythroblast is a dasyure hold.
sent3 & sent14 -> int1: the erythroblast is hieratic and it is a dasyure.; sent12 -> int2: if the erythroblast is hieratic and a dasyure then the fact that it is not anarchistic hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the erythroblast is not anarchistic.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the erythroblast does not expire sirenian and is not a involution is wrong if it is not anarchistic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the erythroblast does not expire sirenian and is not a involution is incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the molding is not a kind of a abidance.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the groom is not a kind of a luge and is not a abidance.; int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is not a kind of a luge and it is not a kind of a abidance is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the molding is non-hieratic if the erythroblast is a abidance. sent2: the fact that something does not expire sirenian and is not a involution is not correct if it is not anarchistic. sent3: the erythroblast is a hieratic. sent4: the fact that the erythroblast is not a luge is right. sent5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a tetrode and it does not retrograde. sent6: if the erythroblast is not a abidance then the groom is not a dasyure. sent7: the molding is not a abidance if the fact that that the erythroblast does not expire sirenian and is not a involution is wrong is correct. sent8: if the molding is not a abidance then the groom is both not a luge and not a abidance. sent9: the molding does expire sirenian. sent10: the fact that if the molding is not anarchistic then the fact that the molding is a kind of a abidance but it is not a hieratic is incorrect is correct. sent11: if something that does broadside prate does drawl it is not incongruous. sent12: if something is a kind of a hieratic and it is a dasyure then it is not anarchistic. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a brag and it is not a tetrode. sent14: the fact that the erythroblast is a dasyure hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent14 -> int1: the erythroblast is hieratic and it is a dasyure.; sent12 -> int2: if the erythroblast is hieratic and a dasyure then the fact that it is not anarchistic hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the erythroblast is not anarchistic.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the erythroblast does not expire sirenian and is not a involution is wrong if it is not anarchistic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the erythroblast does not expire sirenian and is not a involution is incorrect.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the molding is not a kind of a abidance.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the groom is not a kind of a luge and is not a abidance.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__