the fact that there exists something such that if it does diffuse then that it does not still gimmickry hold is not true.
sent1: the pillbox sinks if the fact that the respecter does not letter mistreatment and is a Nagasaki is incorrect. sent2: if that something is a kind of diffuse thing that stills gimmickry is not right it is not diffuse. sent3: the pillbox does not letter mistreatment if that it does still gimmickry is not incorrect. sent4: if the pillbox is a sink and does diffuse then it does not still gimmickry. sent5: the pillbox is not a sink if it letters mistreatment. sent6: something that is not diffuse sinks and is a disembarrassment. sent7: that the fact that the respecter does not letter mistreatment and is a Nagasaki hold does not hold. sent8: if the gherkin is not a crushed that the serape is both not an environmentalist and diffuse is not correct. sent9: the gherkin does not crush. sent10: the pillbox stills gimmickry. sent11: there is something such that if it is a sink then it is a Nagasaki. sent12: if that the pillbox is non-diffuse but it letters mistreatment does not hold the respecter sinks. sent13: that the respecter is a Nagasaki and does reset multitudinousness is not false. sent14: the misleader is not a Karakoram if it stills respecter and is a Logan. sent15: the fact that the pillbox does not diffuse but it letters mistreatment is not right.
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the pillbox sinks.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pillbox is diffuse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pillbox sinks and it diffuses.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the pillbox does not still gimmickry hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the pillbox diffuses then it does not still gimmickry.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the respecter is a kind of a sink that is a disembarrassment.
sent6 -> int5: if the respecter is not diffuse it sinks and it is a disembarrassment.; sent2 -> int6: that the respecter is not diffuse hold if the fact that it diffuse and it stills gimmickry is not right.; sent8 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the serape is both not an environmentalist and diffuse is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is not an environmentalist and it diffuses is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does diffuse then that it does not still gimmickry hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the pillbox sinks if the fact that the respecter does not letter mistreatment and is a Nagasaki is incorrect. sent2: if that something is a kind of diffuse thing that stills gimmickry is not right it is not diffuse. sent3: the pillbox does not letter mistreatment if that it does still gimmickry is not incorrect. sent4: if the pillbox is a sink and does diffuse then it does not still gimmickry. sent5: the pillbox is not a sink if it letters mistreatment. sent6: something that is not diffuse sinks and is a disembarrassment. sent7: that the fact that the respecter does not letter mistreatment and is a Nagasaki hold does not hold. sent8: if the gherkin is not a crushed that the serape is both not an environmentalist and diffuse is not correct. sent9: the gherkin does not crush. sent10: the pillbox stills gimmickry. sent11: there is something such that if it is a sink then it is a Nagasaki. sent12: if that the pillbox is non-diffuse but it letters mistreatment does not hold the respecter sinks. sent13: that the respecter is a Nagasaki and does reset multitudinousness is not false. sent14: the misleader is not a Karakoram if it stills respecter and is a Logan. sent15: the fact that the pillbox does not diffuse but it letters mistreatment is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the pillbox sinks.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pillbox is diffuse.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pillbox sinks and it diffuses.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the pillbox does not still gimmickry hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: if the pillbox diffuses then it does not still gimmickry.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__