the calculableness happens.
sent1: the allopathicness occurs. sent2: the fact that that the allopathicness happens but the collaring Racine does not occur is false if the accommodationalness does not occur hold. sent3: that the fact that the mythicness occurs and the collaring Yorktown does not occur is not right is correct if the cecalness does not occur. sent4: that the sadomasochisticness happens results in that both the curbing and the non-air-to-surfaceness happens. sent5: the befuddling occurs if not the collaring Racine but the allopathicness occurs. sent6: that the collaring Racine happens leads to that the excess but not the pointing occurs. sent7: the accommodationalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the collaring Racine does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the allopathicness but not the collaring Racine happens.; sent2 & sent7 -> int2: that the allopathicness happens and the collaring Racine does not occur is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the collaring Racine happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the excess happens and the point does not occur.;
the befuddling happens.
$hypothesis$ = the calculableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the allopathicness occurs. sent2: the fact that that the allopathicness happens but the collaring Racine does not occur is false if the accommodationalness does not occur hold. sent3: that the fact that the mythicness occurs and the collaring Yorktown does not occur is not right is correct if the cecalness does not occur. sent4: that the sadomasochisticness happens results in that both the curbing and the non-air-to-surfaceness happens. sent5: the befuddling occurs if not the collaring Racine but the allopathicness occurs. sent6: that the collaring Racine happens leads to that the excess but not the pointing occurs. sent7: the accommodationalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the collaring Racine does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the allopathicness but not the collaring Racine happens.; sent2 & sent7 -> int2: that the allopathicness happens and the collaring Racine does not occur is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the collaring Racine happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the excess happens and the point does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__