the untheatricalness happens.
sent1: that the unstableness happens is caused by that the emaciating happens. sent2: if the flimsiness occurs that the hypnotizing project does not occur but the propulsion occurs is not correct. sent3: the emaciating occurs. sent4: the non-symptomaticness causes that the non-scopalness and the hypnotizing scow happens. sent5: that that the non-scopalness and the hypnotizing scow happens is not false is not right if the unstableness occurs. sent6: if the jugularness does not occur but the incubation occurs then the symptomaticness does not occur. sent7: the fact that both the inharmoniousness and the hypnotizing allice happens hold. sent8: the fact that the incubation happens is correct. sent9: the whack and the pinning hundredweight occurs. sent10: that both the whack and the jugularness happens leads to the non-untheatricalness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jugular does not occur.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the jugularness does not occur but the incubation happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the symptomaticness happens is not right.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the non-scopalness and the hypnotizing scow happens.; sent1 & sent3 -> int4: the unstableness happens.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the scopalness does not occur but the hypnotizing scow happens is false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the jugular occurs.; sent9 -> int8: the whack occurs.; int7 & int8 -> int9: both the whacking and the jugularness happens.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the untheatricalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the unstableness happens is caused by that the emaciating happens. sent2: if the flimsiness occurs that the hypnotizing project does not occur but the propulsion occurs is not correct. sent3: the emaciating occurs. sent4: the non-symptomaticness causes that the non-scopalness and the hypnotizing scow happens. sent5: that that the non-scopalness and the hypnotizing scow happens is not false is not right if the unstableness occurs. sent6: if the jugularness does not occur but the incubation occurs then the symptomaticness does not occur. sent7: the fact that both the inharmoniousness and the hypnotizing allice happens hold. sent8: the fact that the incubation happens is correct. sent9: the whack and the pinning hundredweight occurs. sent10: that both the whack and the jugularness happens leads to the non-untheatricalness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jugular does not occur.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the jugularness does not occur but the incubation happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the symptomaticness happens is not right.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the non-scopalness and the hypnotizing scow happens.; sent1 & sent3 -> int4: the unstableness happens.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the scopalness does not occur but the hypnotizing scow happens is false.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the jugular occurs.; sent9 -> int8: the whack occurs.; int7 & int8 -> int9: both the whacking and the jugularness happens.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__