there exists something such that if it is not a dominance and is a kind of a maker then it is suctorial.
sent1: the fact that there is something such that if that it does not behold legitimacy and is spousal hold then it is a kind of a pennywhistle is not wrong. sent2: if the appointment is a dominance and is a maker then it is suctorial. sent3: if the fact that the appointment is not a statute and is suctorial hold it is a kind of a Labanotation. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not an unknown and does retain it reports mealybug. sent5: the appointment is a kind of a Canadian if it is not a kind of a Anthus and it is suctorial. sent6: there is something such that if that it is a dominance and it is a maker is not false it is suctorial. sent7: if something is a kind of a dominance that is a kind of a maker then it is not non-suctorial.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a dominance and is a kind of a maker then it is suctorial. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there is something such that if that it does not behold legitimacy and is spousal hold then it is a kind of a pennywhistle is not wrong. sent2: if the appointment is a dominance and is a maker then it is suctorial. sent3: if the fact that the appointment is not a statute and is suctorial hold it is a kind of a Labanotation. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not an unknown and does retain it reports mealybug. sent5: the appointment is a kind of a Canadian if it is not a kind of a Anthus and it is suctorial. sent6: there is something such that if that it is a dominance and it is a maker is not false it is suctorial. sent7: if something is a kind of a dominance that is a kind of a maker then it is not non-suctorial. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__