the tsetse is both unicameral and not a turpentine.
sent1: if the dais either noses cumulus or is a saurel or both then the bagel is not unicameral. sent2: the dais is a kind of heliacal thing that is a saurel. sent3: that the tsetse is unicameral and is a turpentine is not true. sent4: if that the bagel is not unicameral is true then the fact that the tsetse is a kind of unicameral thing that is not a kind of a turpentine is false. sent5: the fact that the tsetse is unicameral and it is a turpentine is not right if the bagel is not unicameral. sent6: the dais is not a kind of a adobo. sent7: that the dais is heliacal hold. sent8: the fact that the tsetse is heliacal is true. sent9: that the tsetse is a turpentine and it is unicameral does not hold if the bagel is not a kind of a turpentine. sent10: the need is heliacal. sent11: the bagel is not papery. sent12: the bagel is not unicameral if the dais noses cumulus. sent13: the fact that the dais is a saurel and is not heliacal does not hold if it does not nose cumulus.
sent2 -> int1: the dais is a kind of a saurel.; int1 -> int2: the dais noses cumulus or it is a saurel or both.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the bagel is not unicameral.; sent4 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the tsetse is unicameral but it is not a kind of a turpentine.
$hypothesis$ = the tsetse is both unicameral and not a turpentine. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dais either noses cumulus or is a saurel or both then the bagel is not unicameral. sent2: the dais is a kind of heliacal thing that is a saurel. sent3: that the tsetse is unicameral and is a turpentine is not true. sent4: if that the bagel is not unicameral is true then the fact that the tsetse is a kind of unicameral thing that is not a kind of a turpentine is false. sent5: the fact that the tsetse is unicameral and it is a turpentine is not right if the bagel is not unicameral. sent6: the dais is not a kind of a adobo. sent7: that the dais is heliacal hold. sent8: the fact that the tsetse is heliacal is true. sent9: that the tsetse is a turpentine and it is unicameral does not hold if the bagel is not a kind of a turpentine. sent10: the need is heliacal. sent11: the bagel is not papery. sent12: the bagel is not unicameral if the dais noses cumulus. sent13: the fact that the dais is a saurel and is not heliacal does not hold if it does not nose cumulus. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the dais is a kind of a saurel.; int1 -> int2: the dais noses cumulus or it is a saurel or both.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the bagel is not unicameral.; sent4 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__