the meretriciousness does not occur.
sent1: if the spoiling logic happens then the raising occurs. sent2: if the fact that the encroaching occurs is not wrong then the remand happens. sent3: if the fact that both the semioticness and the non-sublunarness happens is incorrect the debriefing corbel does not occur. sent4: if the amplifying sofa does not occur the fact that the languishing does not occur or the seminar does not occur or both is not true. sent5: the meretriciousness happens if that both the regionalness and the non-meretriciousness occurs is not true. sent6: the regionalness happens. sent7: the fact that the encroaching happens hold if the surfacing varnisher happens. sent8: both the anachronism and the contextualness happens if the damnation does not occur. sent9: the amplifying Wagnerian happens if that not the amplifying Wagnerian but the revue happens does not hold. sent10: that the capture does not occur and/or the anachronism causes that the capture does not occur. sent11: both the spoiling Eglevsky and the allowableness happens. sent12: that the debriefing corbel does not occur yields that the damnation does not occur. sent13: that both the seminar and the languishing happens yields that the meretriciousness does not occur. sent14: the capture does not occur or the anachronism happens or both if the comprehensibleness does not occur. sent15: the overclouding does not occur. sent16: the amplifying Auvergne does not occur and/or the voicing occurs. sent17: the amplifying Auvergne occurs. sent18: the couture occurs. sent19: that the regionalness occurs but the overclouding does not occur causes the surfacing varnisher. sent20: if the publication happens then that not the amplifying Wagnerian but the revue happens is not true. sent21: the fact that the semioticness and the non-sublunarness happens does not hold if the amplifying Wagnerian occurs. sent22: the spoiling boardinghouse or the resoluteness or both occurs. sent23: that both the languishing and the amplifying sofa happens is triggered by that the capturing does not occur. sent24: the fact that the comprehensibleness does not occur is not false. sent25: the seminar occurs if the remand happens. sent26: the fact that that the remand happens and the surfacing varnisher happens hold is incorrect if the fact that the encroaching does not occur hold. sent27: the publication happens if the fact that the raising happens is not wrong.
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the regionalness but not the overclouding occurs.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the surfacing varnisher occurs is correct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the encroaching occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the remand happens.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the seminar occurs.; sent14 & sent24 -> int6: the capture does not occur and/or the anachronism occurs.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the capturing does not occur.; sent23 & int7 -> int8: the languishing happens and the amplifying sofa occurs.; int8 -> int9: the languishing happens.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the seminar occurs and the languishing occurs.; int10 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the meretriciousness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the meretriciousness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spoiling logic happens then the raising occurs. sent2: if the fact that the encroaching occurs is not wrong then the remand happens. sent3: if the fact that both the semioticness and the non-sublunarness happens is incorrect the debriefing corbel does not occur. sent4: if the amplifying sofa does not occur the fact that the languishing does not occur or the seminar does not occur or both is not true. sent5: the meretriciousness happens if that both the regionalness and the non-meretriciousness occurs is not true. sent6: the regionalness happens. sent7: the fact that the encroaching happens hold if the surfacing varnisher happens. sent8: both the anachronism and the contextualness happens if the damnation does not occur. sent9: the amplifying Wagnerian happens if that not the amplifying Wagnerian but the revue happens does not hold. sent10: that the capture does not occur and/or the anachronism causes that the capture does not occur. sent11: both the spoiling Eglevsky and the allowableness happens. sent12: that the debriefing corbel does not occur yields that the damnation does not occur. sent13: that both the seminar and the languishing happens yields that the meretriciousness does not occur. sent14: the capture does not occur or the anachronism happens or both if the comprehensibleness does not occur. sent15: the overclouding does not occur. sent16: the amplifying Auvergne does not occur and/or the voicing occurs. sent17: the amplifying Auvergne occurs. sent18: the couture occurs. sent19: that the regionalness occurs but the overclouding does not occur causes the surfacing varnisher. sent20: if the publication happens then that not the amplifying Wagnerian but the revue happens is not true. sent21: the fact that the semioticness and the non-sublunarness happens does not hold if the amplifying Wagnerian occurs. sent22: the spoiling boardinghouse or the resoluteness or both occurs. sent23: that both the languishing and the amplifying sofa happens is triggered by that the capturing does not occur. sent24: the fact that the comprehensibleness does not occur is not false. sent25: the seminar occurs if the remand happens. sent26: the fact that that the remand happens and the surfacing varnisher happens hold is incorrect if the fact that the encroaching does not occur hold. sent27: the publication happens if the fact that the raising happens is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the regionalness but not the overclouding occurs.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the surfacing varnisher occurs is correct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the encroaching occurs.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the remand happens.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the seminar occurs.; sent14 & sent24 -> int6: the capture does not occur and/or the anachronism occurs.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the capturing does not occur.; sent23 & int7 -> int8: the languishing happens and the amplifying sofa occurs.; int8 -> int9: the languishing happens.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the seminar occurs and the languishing occurs.; int10 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__