the transplanter is a Demavend.
sent1: that the clericalist marbles directive but it does not sculpt is true. sent2: the caroler is a namer if it is not a carillonneur and is not a awl. sent3: if the exhibitionism severs that the beading severs and is not sedimentary is wrong. sent4: that the transplanter is a kind of a Demavend and it is a Spyeria is not wrong if the beading is not parental. sent5: if that the beading does sever but it is not sedimentary is not true then it is non-parental. sent6: the caroler is not a namer if the clericalist marbles directive but it does not sculpt.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caroler is both not a carillonneur and not a awl.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the caroler is a kind of a namer.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: the caroler is not a kind of a namer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the caroler is not a carillonneur and it is not a kind of a awl is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the transplanter is a Demavend. ; $context$ = sent1: that the clericalist marbles directive but it does not sculpt is true. sent2: the caroler is a namer if it is not a carillonneur and is not a awl. sent3: if the exhibitionism severs that the beading severs and is not sedimentary is wrong. sent4: that the transplanter is a kind of a Demavend and it is a Spyeria is not wrong if the beading is not parental. sent5: if that the beading does sever but it is not sedimentary is not true then it is non-parental. sent6: the caroler is not a namer if the clericalist marbles directive but it does not sculpt. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caroler is both not a carillonneur and not a awl.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the caroler is a kind of a namer.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: the caroler is not a kind of a namer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the caroler is not a carillonneur and it is not a kind of a awl is false.; __UNKNOWN__