there is something such that that it does not enjoy preexistence and it does not snuffle metamorphism is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a lumen and is a uncommonness. sent2: the hornpipe is a kind of a uncommonness. sent3: there is something such that it does not enjoy preexistence and does not snuffle metamorphism. sent4: that the hornpipe does not enjoy preexistence but it does snuffle metamorphism does not hold. sent5: there is something such that that it is superjacent is right. sent6: the individual does not snuffle metamorphism if the spleen is a cambium but it does not snuffle metamorphism. sent7: the Oxford is not a lumen if that it is not a uncommonness and is a lumen is not right. sent8: there exists something such that it is a kind of a uncommonness. sent9: if something does snuffle inadequacy then the fact that it is not a kind of a imprecation and it is not a cuspidation is not correct. sent10: if something does spoon Sciaridae then that it enjoys preexistence and it does not snuffle metamorphism does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a abrachia and intrudes is wrong. sent12: if something does spoon Sciaridae that it does not enjoy preexistence and does not snuffle metamorphism is false. sent13: the fact that the hornpipe does spoon Sciaridae and is not glorious is not correct. sent14: if something spoons Sciaridae that it does not enjoy preexistence and snuffles metamorphism is incorrect. sent15: if the hornpipe does spoon Sciaridae the fact that it does enjoy preexistence and does not snuffle metamorphism is false. sent16: the Oxford does not spoon Sciaridae if that the interleaf does not enjoy preexistence and it does not spoon Sciaridae does not hold. sent17: the fact that something snuffles raster and does not intrude is not true if it is a neoliberal. sent18: there exists something such that that it is lipless and does not enjoy Emberizidae is not right. sent19: there is something such that that it does not enjoy preexistence and snuffles metamorphism does not hold. sent20: the fact that something is not a uncommonness but it is a lumen does not hold if it does not spoon Sciaridae.
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the hornpipe does not enjoy preexistence and it does not snuffle metamorphism is not right if it spoons Sciaridae.;
there exists something such that that it is not a buzzer and it is not a Quine is not right.
sent20 -> int2: the fact that the Oxford is not a uncommonness but it is a kind of a lumen is not correct if it does not spoon Sciaridae.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that that it does not enjoy preexistence and it does not snuffle metamorphism is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a lumen and is a uncommonness. sent2: the hornpipe is a kind of a uncommonness. sent3: there is something such that it does not enjoy preexistence and does not snuffle metamorphism. sent4: that the hornpipe does not enjoy preexistence but it does snuffle metamorphism does not hold. sent5: there is something such that that it is superjacent is right. sent6: the individual does not snuffle metamorphism if the spleen is a cambium but it does not snuffle metamorphism. sent7: the Oxford is not a lumen if that it is not a uncommonness and is a lumen is not right. sent8: there exists something such that it is a kind of a uncommonness. sent9: if something does snuffle inadequacy then the fact that it is not a kind of a imprecation and it is not a cuspidation is not correct. sent10: if something does spoon Sciaridae then that it enjoys preexistence and it does not snuffle metamorphism does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a abrachia and intrudes is wrong. sent12: if something does spoon Sciaridae that it does not enjoy preexistence and does not snuffle metamorphism is false. sent13: the fact that the hornpipe does spoon Sciaridae and is not glorious is not correct. sent14: if something spoons Sciaridae that it does not enjoy preexistence and snuffles metamorphism is incorrect. sent15: if the hornpipe does spoon Sciaridae the fact that it does enjoy preexistence and does not snuffle metamorphism is false. sent16: the Oxford does not spoon Sciaridae if that the interleaf does not enjoy preexistence and it does not spoon Sciaridae does not hold. sent17: the fact that something snuffles raster and does not intrude is not true if it is a neoliberal. sent18: there exists something such that that it is lipless and does not enjoy Emberizidae is not right. sent19: there is something such that that it does not enjoy preexistence and snuffles metamorphism does not hold. sent20: the fact that something is not a uncommonness but it is a lumen does not hold if it does not spoon Sciaridae. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the hornpipe does not enjoy preexistence and it does not snuffle metamorphism is not right if it spoons Sciaridae.; __UNKNOWN__