the capableness happens but the stacking does not occur if the puncturableness does not occur.
sent1: the parching Theodosius happens and the Crow does not occur. sent2: the pronominal does not occur. sent3: the stacking does not occur if that both the blip and the bisexualness occurs does not hold. sent4: the fact that the snipping occurs and the youngerness occurs is not correct if the unsteadiness does not occur. sent5: the underdressing does not occur. sent6: that the capableness but not the stack happens is triggered by that the puncturableness happens. sent7: the fact that that the blip and the bisexual happens does not hold is not wrong if the puncturableness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the ravage does not occur hold. sent9: the phonologicalness does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the homestead and the persecution happens does not hold. sent11: the inductiveness does not occur. sent12: both the nonhierarchicalness and the non-inconstantness occurs if the parching bobwhite does not occur. sent13: the parching travel does not occur. sent14: if the puncturableness happens then that the blip happens and the bisexualness happens is incorrect. sent15: the skateboarding happens. sent16: the intestinalness does not occur. sent17: if the disobeying Cynara does not occur the decriminalization but not the disobeying transferor happens. sent18: if the bisexual does not occur then the stack does not occur. sent19: the parching Theodosius happens. sent20: if the dash does not occur that the tracklessness happens and the idleness happens does not hold. sent21: the hypothecating does not occur. sent22: the frequenting does not occur if the fact that both the nepotism and the intestinalness occurs is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the puncturableness does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the blip happens and the bisexualness happens is false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the stack does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the capableness happens but the stacking does not occur if the puncturableness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the parching Theodosius happens and the Crow does not occur. sent2: the pronominal does not occur. sent3: the stacking does not occur if that both the blip and the bisexualness occurs does not hold. sent4: the fact that the snipping occurs and the youngerness occurs is not correct if the unsteadiness does not occur. sent5: the underdressing does not occur. sent6: that the capableness but not the stack happens is triggered by that the puncturableness happens. sent7: the fact that that the blip and the bisexual happens does not hold is not wrong if the puncturableness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the ravage does not occur hold. sent9: the phonologicalness does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the homestead and the persecution happens does not hold. sent11: the inductiveness does not occur. sent12: both the nonhierarchicalness and the non-inconstantness occurs if the parching bobwhite does not occur. sent13: the parching travel does not occur. sent14: if the puncturableness happens then that the blip happens and the bisexualness happens is incorrect. sent15: the skateboarding happens. sent16: the intestinalness does not occur. sent17: if the disobeying Cynara does not occur the decriminalization but not the disobeying transferor happens. sent18: if the bisexual does not occur then the stack does not occur. sent19: the parching Theodosius happens. sent20: if the dash does not occur that the tracklessness happens and the idleness happens does not hold. sent21: the hypothecating does not occur. sent22: the frequenting does not occur if the fact that both the nepotism and the intestinalness occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the puncturableness does not occur.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the blip happens and the bisexualness happens is false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the stack does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__