the fact that the Napoleon is not a goldfields and does not repine Lycaenidae is not correct.
sent1: something is not a goldfields and it does not repine Lycaenidae if it is valvular. sent2: the plane is valvular. sent3: if something is a kind of a revenuer then the minocycline repines Lycaenidae. sent4: if the minocycline repines Lycaenidae then the fact that that the Napoleon is not a goldfields and does not repines Lycaenidae is incorrect hold. sent5: if the plane is valvular then it is a kind of a revenuer.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the plane is a revenuer.; int1 -> int2: something is a revenuer.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the minocycline repines Lycaenidae.; sent4 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Napoleon is not a goldfields and does not repine Lycaenidae.
sent1 -> int4: if the Napoleon is valvular then it is not a goldfields and it does not repine Lycaenidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Napoleon is not a goldfields and does not repine Lycaenidae is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a goldfields and it does not repine Lycaenidae if it is valvular. sent2: the plane is valvular. sent3: if something is a kind of a revenuer then the minocycline repines Lycaenidae. sent4: if the minocycline repines Lycaenidae then the fact that that the Napoleon is not a goldfields and does not repines Lycaenidae is incorrect hold. sent5: if the plane is valvular then it is a kind of a revenuer. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the plane is a revenuer.; int1 -> int2: something is a revenuer.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the minocycline repines Lycaenidae.; sent4 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__