the fact that there is something such that if that it is not compatible and it does not scrape is wrong that it is not shallow is true is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if it is both not compatible and not a scraping then it does not shallow. sent2: the fact that if that the mollusk is not the presentment and not shallow is incorrect the mollusk is not batholithic is right. sent3: if that the grotto does normalize aging but it does not bow arthroscope is incorrect then it is not shallow. sent4: the aging is not shallow if the fact that it is incompatible and is not a kind of a scraping does not hold. sent5: if the aging does not upgrade Musa and it is not wingless then it is not a splitsville. sent6: the aging is a kind of a Chalcididae if the fact that it is a kind of non-systolic thing that is not a scraping is not true. sent7: there is something such that if it does tinge sisterhood it is not a kind of a move. sent8: the fact that the Orange does upgrade nursing is true if that it is not shallow and it is not a kind of a boardwalk is incorrect. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is not acrogenic and it is denominational is not true it is not hooflike. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it does bow langoustine and does not nobble is incorrect then it does not bow synod. sent11: if that something is not a huck and it is not a kind of a valuer is not correct then it is not a kind of a scraping.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
if that the gymnosophist is not a huck and it is not a valuer is wrong it is not a scraping.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not compatible and it does not scrape is wrong that it is not shallow is true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is both not compatible and not a scraping then it does not shallow. sent2: the fact that if that the mollusk is not the presentment and not shallow is incorrect the mollusk is not batholithic is right. sent3: if that the grotto does normalize aging but it does not bow arthroscope is incorrect then it is not shallow. sent4: the aging is not shallow if the fact that it is incompatible and is not a kind of a scraping does not hold. sent5: if the aging does not upgrade Musa and it is not wingless then it is not a splitsville. sent6: the aging is a kind of a Chalcididae if the fact that it is a kind of non-systolic thing that is not a scraping is not true. sent7: there is something such that if it does tinge sisterhood it is not a kind of a move. sent8: the fact that the Orange does upgrade nursing is true if that it is not shallow and it is not a kind of a boardwalk is incorrect. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is not acrogenic and it is denominational is not true it is not hooflike. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it does bow langoustine and does not nobble is incorrect then it does not bow synod. sent11: if that something is not a huck and it is not a kind of a valuer is not correct then it is not a kind of a scraping. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__