that the Kotex is gerundial is false.
sent1: if something is a screw then it is gerundial. sent2: if the conjunction does usher cover-up the Liquidambar is not a conic and usher cover-up. sent3: the fact that the bulgur is a kind of non-gerundial thing that does not usher cover-up is incorrect if the conjunction does not screw. sent4: the Liquidambar does segregate Kotex. sent5: if the fact that the bulgur is not gerundial and it does not usher cover-up is not right then the Kotex is not gerundial. sent6: the conjunction ushers cover-up if the bulgur screws. sent7: if the conjunction does usher cover-up then the Liquidambar does usher cover-up. sent8: the mucosa is a screw and it does usher copepod. sent9: that the Kotex is a screw but not non-profaned is right if the bulgur does not screw. sent10: everything segregates Kotex and it is conic. sent11: if the bulgur does not screw the Kotex is profaned.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bulgur is a screw is right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the conjunction ushers cover-up.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Liquidambar is not a conic but it does usher cover-up.; int2 -> int3: the Liquidambar is not a conic.; sent10 -> int4: the Liquidambar segregates Kotex and is a kind of a conic.; int4 -> int5: the Liquidambar is not non-conic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the bulgur is not a screw.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the Kotex is a screw and it is profaned.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the Kotex is a screw is not false.; sent1 -> int10: if the Kotex is a screw it is gerundial.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the Kotex is not gerundial.
$hypothesis$ = that the Kotex is gerundial is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a screw then it is gerundial. sent2: if the conjunction does usher cover-up the Liquidambar is not a conic and usher cover-up. sent3: the fact that the bulgur is a kind of non-gerundial thing that does not usher cover-up is incorrect if the conjunction does not screw. sent4: the Liquidambar does segregate Kotex. sent5: if the fact that the bulgur is not gerundial and it does not usher cover-up is not right then the Kotex is not gerundial. sent6: the conjunction ushers cover-up if the bulgur screws. sent7: if the conjunction does usher cover-up then the Liquidambar does usher cover-up. sent8: the mucosa is a screw and it does usher copepod. sent9: that the Kotex is a screw but not non-profaned is right if the bulgur does not screw. sent10: everything segregates Kotex and it is conic. sent11: if the bulgur does not screw the Kotex is profaned. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bulgur is a screw is right.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the conjunction ushers cover-up.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Liquidambar is not a conic but it does usher cover-up.; int2 -> int3: the Liquidambar is not a conic.; sent10 -> int4: the Liquidambar segregates Kotex and is a kind of a conic.; int4 -> int5: the Liquidambar is not non-conic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the bulgur is not a screw.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the Kotex is a screw and it is profaned.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the Kotex is a screw is not false.; sent1 -> int10: if the Kotex is a screw it is gerundial.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__