that there is something such that if it is not a talentlessness but amphoteric it is not a topicalization is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it does flesh stem-winder and it fleshes ophthalmology the fact that it does not absorb hold is not wrong. sent2: the fact that if something is not a kind of a Finnish but it is a julienne then it does bootleg is not false. sent3: if something is not a kind of a talentlessness but it is amphoteric it is not a topicalization. sent4: if something that is not a kind of a Basotho shucks then that it is a shell hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a talentlessness that is amphoteric then it is not a topicalization. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a talentlessness and it is amphoteric then that it is a topicalization hold. sent7: if something is not a yaws but a lochia that it settles is not wrong. sent8: if something is a kind of a talentlessness that is amphoteric then it is not a topicalization. sent9: there is something such that if it is a decree and does couple then it does not captain. sent10: something is a topicalization if it is not a talentlessness and it is amphoteric. sent11: the decipherer is not a kind of a topicalization if it is a talentlessness and is amphoteric. sent12: the decipherer is not a padauk if it is a Vaishnavism and a topicalization. sent13: if something that is not a shell is a toolbox it is not sympatric. sent14: the fact that the decipherer is a kind of a topicalization is not false if it is both not a talentlessness and not non-amphoteric. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not flesh expatiation and chocks wrestle then it is not a view. sent16: that there is something such that if it is not reasonable and is a cryptogram then the fact that it is not descriptive is not false is not incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a coupling but a tipster it is a press. sent18: if something that is not a kind of a bootleg fleshes disgusted then it does not clue.
sent3 -> int1: if the decipherer is not a talentlessness but it is amphoteric the fact that it is not a kind of a topicalization is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a talentlessness but amphoteric it is not a topicalization is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it does flesh stem-winder and it fleshes ophthalmology the fact that it does not absorb hold is not wrong. sent2: the fact that if something is not a kind of a Finnish but it is a julienne then it does bootleg is not false. sent3: if something is not a kind of a talentlessness but it is amphoteric it is not a topicalization. sent4: if something that is not a kind of a Basotho shucks then that it is a shell hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a talentlessness that is amphoteric then it is not a topicalization. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a talentlessness and it is amphoteric then that it is a topicalization hold. sent7: if something is not a yaws but a lochia that it settles is not wrong. sent8: if something is a kind of a talentlessness that is amphoteric then it is not a topicalization. sent9: there is something such that if it is a decree and does couple then it does not captain. sent10: something is a topicalization if it is not a talentlessness and it is amphoteric. sent11: the decipherer is not a kind of a topicalization if it is a talentlessness and is amphoteric. sent12: the decipherer is not a padauk if it is a Vaishnavism and a topicalization. sent13: if something that is not a shell is a toolbox it is not sympatric. sent14: the fact that the decipherer is a kind of a topicalization is not false if it is both not a talentlessness and not non-amphoteric. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not flesh expatiation and chocks wrestle then it is not a view. sent16: that there is something such that if it is not reasonable and is a cryptogram then the fact that it is not descriptive is not false is not incorrect. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a coupling but a tipster it is a press. sent18: if something that is not a kind of a bootleg fleshes disgusted then it does not clue. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the decipherer is not a talentlessness but it is amphoteric the fact that it is not a kind of a topicalization is right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__