the teamster is not anosmic.
sent1: the illustrator is not ducal if that that the cerecloth is not ducal but it is a kind of a mineralogy does not hold is not false. sent2: the Indonesian does tweedle strait if the illustrator is costive. sent3: if the fact that something is not floricultural but it is meiotic is not correct then it is not ambiversive. sent4: the fact that something is anosmic and does not relieve is not right if it is not ambiversive. sent5: the illustrator is not an angioplasty but it does will. sent6: that the illustrator splutters teamster and is not a bandsaw is not right if that it is ambiversive is right. sent7: if the illustrator does not stick then the Indonesian tweedles strait. sent8: something is not a kind of a mineralogy. sent9: something is not ducal and is not a kind of a mineralogy if it does tweedle strait. sent10: the teamster is not anosmic if there exists something such that that it does splutter teamster and is not a bandsaw is false. sent11: if something is not a shear and is not a scammony then it is a GP. sent12: that something is not floricultural but meiotic does not hold if it does croquet. sent13: something is costive and/or it is not a stick if it is a GP. sent14: the teamster is not anosmic if there exists something such that it is a bandsaw. sent15: something is a kind of a croquet if it is not ducal and it is not a mineralogy. sent16: if the illustrator is floricultural that that the teamster is not meiotic but it is ambiversive is false is correct. sent17: if the illustrator is not an angioplasty it is not a shear and it is not a kind of a scammony. sent18: the illustrator is ambiversive.
sent6 & sent18 -> int1: that the illustrator does splutter teamster but it is not a bandsaw is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that that it does splutter teamster and it is not a kind of a bandsaw hold is not correct.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the Indonesian is a kind of anosmic thing that does not relieve is not correct.
sent4 -> int3: if the Indonesian is not ambiversive then that it is anosmic and it does not relieve is not true.; sent3 -> int4: the Indonesian is not ambiversive if that it is not floricultural and it is meiotic is false.; sent12 -> int5: that the Indonesian is not floricultural but it is meiotic is wrong if it is a croquet.; sent15 -> int6: if the Indonesian is not ducal and it is not a kind of a mineralogy it is a croquet.; sent9 -> int7: if the Indonesian tweedles strait it is not ducal and it is not a mineralogy.; sent13 -> int8: either the illustrator is costive or it does not stick or both if it is a GP.; sent11 -> int9: the illustrator is a GP if it is not a shear and it is not a scammony.; sent5 -> int10: the illustrator is not a kind of an angioplasty.; sent17 & int10 -> int11: the illustrator is not a shear and not a scammony.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the illustrator is a GP.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the illustrator is costive and/or it is not a kind of a stick.; int13 & sent2 & sent7 -> int14: the Indonesian tweedles strait.; int7 & int14 -> int15: the Indonesian is not ducal and it is not a mineralogy.; int6 & int15 -> int16: the Indonesian is a croquet.; int5 & int16 -> int17: that the Indonesian is not floricultural and is meiotic is not correct.; int4 & int17 -> int18: the Indonesian is not ambiversive.; int3 & int18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the teamster is not anosmic. ; $context$ = sent1: the illustrator is not ducal if that that the cerecloth is not ducal but it is a kind of a mineralogy does not hold is not false. sent2: the Indonesian does tweedle strait if the illustrator is costive. sent3: if the fact that something is not floricultural but it is meiotic is not correct then it is not ambiversive. sent4: the fact that something is anosmic and does not relieve is not right if it is not ambiversive. sent5: the illustrator is not an angioplasty but it does will. sent6: that the illustrator splutters teamster and is not a bandsaw is not right if that it is ambiversive is right. sent7: if the illustrator does not stick then the Indonesian tweedles strait. sent8: something is not a kind of a mineralogy. sent9: something is not ducal and is not a kind of a mineralogy if it does tweedle strait. sent10: the teamster is not anosmic if there exists something such that that it does splutter teamster and is not a bandsaw is false. sent11: if something is not a shear and is not a scammony then it is a GP. sent12: that something is not floricultural but meiotic does not hold if it does croquet. sent13: something is costive and/or it is not a stick if it is a GP. sent14: the teamster is not anosmic if there exists something such that it is a bandsaw. sent15: something is a kind of a croquet if it is not ducal and it is not a mineralogy. sent16: if the illustrator is floricultural that that the teamster is not meiotic but it is ambiversive is false is correct. sent17: if the illustrator is not an angioplasty it is not a shear and it is not a kind of a scammony. sent18: the illustrator is ambiversive. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent18 -> int1: that the illustrator does splutter teamster but it is not a bandsaw is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that that it does splutter teamster and it is not a kind of a bandsaw hold is not correct.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__