that the valetudinarian is a kind of a seventieth and it mobilizes is not right.
sent1: there is something such that that it does not mobilize and is not a knock is not correct. sent2: something is not Shuha and is not a kind of a condemnation. sent3: that that the washroom is not Shuha and it is not a kind of a condemnation hold is not right if the atmometer is Hebraic. sent4: the mandate does not rendezvous counterweight if that there exists something such that the fact that it is not Shuha and is not a kind of a condemnation is wrong hold. sent5: that the mandate does not rendezvous counterweight is incorrect if the fact that it knocks and it is not parhelic hold. sent6: the fact that the mandate is a knock is correct. sent7: there exists nothing such that that it is not a basidiolichen and it is not a knock is not false. sent8: the gargoyle is either allopatric or Hebraic or both if the atmometer is Hebraic. sent9: if something does not rendezvous counterweight the valetudinarian is Hebraic a seventieth. sent10: the atmometer does not rendezvous counterweight if that the washroom is not allopatric but it rendezvous counterweight is not right. sent11: that the valetudinarian is a seventieth and does mobilize does not hold if the berk is not a kind of a seventieth. sent12: the fact that the washroom is not Shuha but it is a condemnation is incorrect. sent13: the mandate is a knock but it is not parhelic. sent14: if that the washroom is not a basidiolichen and not a knock is not true then it is non-parhelic. sent15: the fact that the washroom is not allopatric and does rendezvous counterweight is not right if it is not parhelic. sent16: if the atmometer is Hebraic then that the washroom is not Shuha but a condemnation does not hold. sent17: the mandate is Hebraic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the atmometer is Hebraic.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the washroom is not Shuha and not a condemnation is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is non-Shuha thing that is not a condemnation is wrong.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the mandate does not rendezvous counterweight.; sent5 & sent13 -> int4: the mandate does rendezvous counterweight.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the atmometer is not Hebraic.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the gargoyle is allopatric or is Hebraic or both.;
the valetudinarian is a kind of a seventieth that does mobilize.
sent7 -> int8: that the washroom is not a basidiolichen and not a knock is not correct.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the washroom is not parhelic.; sent15 & int9 -> int10: that that the washroom is not allopatric and rendezvous counterweight is wrong is not false.; sent10 & int10 -> int11: the atmometer does not rendezvous counterweight.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it does not rendezvous counterweight is not wrong.; int12 & sent9 -> int13: the valetudinarian is Hebraic and is a seventieth.; int13 -> int14: the valetudinarian is a seventieth.;
$hypothesis$ = that the valetudinarian is a kind of a seventieth and it mobilizes is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it does not mobilize and is not a knock is not correct. sent2: something is not Shuha and is not a kind of a condemnation. sent3: that that the washroom is not Shuha and it is not a kind of a condemnation hold is not right if the atmometer is Hebraic. sent4: the mandate does not rendezvous counterweight if that there exists something such that the fact that it is not Shuha and is not a kind of a condemnation is wrong hold. sent5: that the mandate does not rendezvous counterweight is incorrect if the fact that it knocks and it is not parhelic hold. sent6: the fact that the mandate is a knock is correct. sent7: there exists nothing such that that it is not a basidiolichen and it is not a knock is not false. sent8: the gargoyle is either allopatric or Hebraic or both if the atmometer is Hebraic. sent9: if something does not rendezvous counterweight the valetudinarian is Hebraic a seventieth. sent10: the atmometer does not rendezvous counterweight if that the washroom is not allopatric but it rendezvous counterweight is not right. sent11: that the valetudinarian is a seventieth and does mobilize does not hold if the berk is not a kind of a seventieth. sent12: the fact that the washroom is not Shuha but it is a condemnation is incorrect. sent13: the mandate is a knock but it is not parhelic. sent14: if that the washroom is not a basidiolichen and not a knock is not true then it is non-parhelic. sent15: the fact that the washroom is not allopatric and does rendezvous counterweight is not right if it is not parhelic. sent16: if the atmometer is Hebraic then that the washroom is not Shuha but a condemnation does not hold. sent17: the mandate is Hebraic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the atmometer is Hebraic.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the washroom is not Shuha and not a condemnation is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is non-Shuha thing that is not a condemnation is wrong.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the mandate does not rendezvous counterweight.; sent5 & sent13 -> int4: the mandate does rendezvous counterweight.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the atmometer is not Hebraic.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the gargoyle is allopatric or is Hebraic or both.; __UNKNOWN__