the pekoe is not a kind of a wise.
sent1: the fact that the pekoe is a wise if the Cheddar is electoral is correct. sent2: the mutterer is practical but it is not a lobule if the plow is trustworthy. sent3: that the Cheddar is not non-electoral is not wrong if the crossopterygian is not a Chipewyan but it is trustworthy. sent4: that if the mutterer is trustworthy then that the crossopterygian is a lobule but not wise hold is correct. sent5: there is nothing such that it is a kind of practical thing that is not a kind of a lobule. sent6: if the plow is not trustworthy the fact that the crossopterygian is not a Chipewyan but it is trustworthy hold. sent7: if the plow is trustworthy that the mutterer is practical is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the plow is trustworthy.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the mutterer is practical thing that is not a kind of a lobule.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that the mutterer is a kind of practical thing that is not a lobule does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the plow is not trustworthy.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the crossopterygian is not a Chipewyan but trustworthy.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the Cheddar is electoral.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pekoe is not a kind of a wise. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the pekoe is a wise if the Cheddar is electoral is correct. sent2: the mutterer is practical but it is not a lobule if the plow is trustworthy. sent3: that the Cheddar is not non-electoral is not wrong if the crossopterygian is not a Chipewyan but it is trustworthy. sent4: that if the mutterer is trustworthy then that the crossopterygian is a lobule but not wise hold is correct. sent5: there is nothing such that it is a kind of practical thing that is not a kind of a lobule. sent6: if the plow is not trustworthy the fact that the crossopterygian is not a Chipewyan but it is trustworthy hold. sent7: if the plow is trustworthy that the mutterer is practical is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the plow is trustworthy.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the mutterer is practical thing that is not a kind of a lobule.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that the mutterer is a kind of practical thing that is not a lobule does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the plow is not trustworthy.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the crossopterygian is not a Chipewyan but trustworthy.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the Cheddar is electoral.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__