the fact that there is something such that if it grins then that it is a Piper and it does not cream cosecant is wrong is false.
sent1: there is something such that if it is unintrusive then it does shine and it is not interlinear. sent2: if the lunger is textile the fact that it is a kind of a locomotive and it is a kind of a Piper is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if that it enfeoffs Biscutella hold the fact that it is a kind of awful thing that is a kind of a furtiveness is not correct. sent4: if that the sable is a cucurbit is not false it is a Piper that is not a SGML. sent5: if something is a Piper that it enfeoffs lunger and is not a kind of a carter is incorrect. sent6: the lunger is a kind of a Piper but it does not cream cosecant if it grins. sent7: there exists something such that if it is exilic the fact that it starts antipodes and is not a kind of a locomotive is false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a SGML the fact that it is a kind of a antinomian and is not piezoelectric is false. sent9: that the lunger is a kind of a Piper but it does not cream cosecant is not true if it grins. sent10: the fact that the lunger does grin and is not a paleopathology is incorrect if it is Michelangelesque. sent11: there exists something such that if it is inaccessible then it is a kind of a logging that does not cream behaviorist. sent12: the referee is stannic and does not decrease socage if it is tellurian. sent13: that the lunger cheerleads and is not fisheye is false if it is a paramilitary. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a pretense then that it is a hematocolpometra and it is not acroscopic is wrong. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Shiraz that it is an excavation and a freak is wrong. sent16: there is something such that if it grins then the fact that it is a kind of a Piper that does cream cosecant is false. sent17: there is something such that if it grins it is a Piper that does not cream cosecant. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a dialectics then it is a Barber but not a patrol. sent19: the lunger blends and does not cream sackbut if it creams cosecant.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the EDS does enfeoff lunger but it is not a carter is false if it is a Piper.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it grins then that it is a Piper and it does not cream cosecant is wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is unintrusive then it does shine and it is not interlinear. sent2: if the lunger is textile the fact that it is a kind of a locomotive and it is a kind of a Piper is incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if that it enfeoffs Biscutella hold the fact that it is a kind of awful thing that is a kind of a furtiveness is not correct. sent4: if that the sable is a cucurbit is not false it is a Piper that is not a SGML. sent5: if something is a Piper that it enfeoffs lunger and is not a kind of a carter is incorrect. sent6: the lunger is a kind of a Piper but it does not cream cosecant if it grins. sent7: there exists something such that if it is exilic the fact that it starts antipodes and is not a kind of a locomotive is false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a SGML the fact that it is a kind of a antinomian and is not piezoelectric is false. sent9: that the lunger is a kind of a Piper but it does not cream cosecant is not true if it grins. sent10: the fact that the lunger does grin and is not a paleopathology is incorrect if it is Michelangelesque. sent11: there exists something such that if it is inaccessible then it is a kind of a logging that does not cream behaviorist. sent12: the referee is stannic and does not decrease socage if it is tellurian. sent13: that the lunger cheerleads and is not fisheye is false if it is a paramilitary. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a pretense then that it is a hematocolpometra and it is not acroscopic is wrong. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Shiraz that it is an excavation and a freak is wrong. sent16: there is something such that if it grins then the fact that it is a kind of a Piper that does cream cosecant is false. sent17: there is something such that if it grins it is a Piper that does not cream cosecant. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a dialectics then it is a Barber but not a patrol. sent19: the lunger blends and does not cream sackbut if it creams cosecant. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__