the traceableness occurs.
sent1: the radiolucentness does not occur. sent2: the bespangling bombast does not occur. sent3: the graining occurs. sent4: the volatile does not occur if the backspin occurs and the graining does not occur. sent5: the wiriness happens. sent6: that the unshockableness happens or that the monotheisticness does not occur or both prevents that the destining Patrick occurs. sent7: the autodidacticness does not occur and the destining taurine happens. sent8: if the backspin does not occur and the graining happens then the endearment does not occur. sent9: if the scalding xylene occurs the tension happens. sent10: if the glint happens the technology happens. sent11: if the rh-negativeness does not occur but the finalization occurs then the volatile occurs. sent12: the graining happens if the wiriness happens. sent13: if that the destining Patrick does not occur is not wrong then the fact that both the wiriness and the pardon happens is wrong. sent14: if the wiriness occurs then not the backspin but the graining happens. sent15: the destining waterer does not occur. sent16: the apothecialness does not occur. sent17: the non-traceableness is triggered by that the finalization does not occur. sent18: if the volatile happens the endearment occurs. sent19: the traceableness does not occur if the fact that both the non-rh-negativeness and the finalization happens is wrong. sent20: the finalization occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the rh-negativeness but the finalization happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the volatileness occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the endearment happens.; sent14 & sent5 -> int3: not the backspin but the grain happens.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the endearment does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the rh-negativeness does not occur and the finalization happens is not right.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the traceableness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the traceableness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the radiolucentness does not occur. sent2: the bespangling bombast does not occur. sent3: the graining occurs. sent4: the volatile does not occur if the backspin occurs and the graining does not occur. sent5: the wiriness happens. sent6: that the unshockableness happens or that the monotheisticness does not occur or both prevents that the destining Patrick occurs. sent7: the autodidacticness does not occur and the destining taurine happens. sent8: if the backspin does not occur and the graining happens then the endearment does not occur. sent9: if the scalding xylene occurs the tension happens. sent10: if the glint happens the technology happens. sent11: if the rh-negativeness does not occur but the finalization occurs then the volatile occurs. sent12: the graining happens if the wiriness happens. sent13: if that the destining Patrick does not occur is not wrong then the fact that both the wiriness and the pardon happens is wrong. sent14: if the wiriness occurs then not the backspin but the graining happens. sent15: the destining waterer does not occur. sent16: the apothecialness does not occur. sent17: the non-traceableness is triggered by that the finalization does not occur. sent18: if the volatile happens the endearment occurs. sent19: the traceableness does not occur if the fact that both the non-rh-negativeness and the finalization happens is wrong. sent20: the finalization occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the rh-negativeness but the finalization happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the volatileness occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the endearment happens.; sent14 & sent5 -> int3: not the backspin but the grain happens.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the endearment does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the rh-negativeness does not occur and the finalization happens is not right.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__