either the seconder does repress ante or it does beggar Iago or both.
sent1: the ink is a smart and/or is not a kind of a precava. sent2: the ink is a kind of dicotyledonous thing that is not a lyricality. sent3: if the seconder does beggar Iago the ink does beggar Iago. sent4: the seconder does not repress ante and/or is a precava. sent5: that something does repress ante or does beggar Iago or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a precava. sent6: the adducer does not repress ante. sent7: if the ink does not repress ante the seconder is dicotyledonous. sent8: the ink is not smart if it is dicotyledonous and it is not a lyricality.
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the ink is not smart.; int1 -> int2: the ink is not a smart or it is not a precava or both.;
either the ink beggars Iago or it is cross-modal or both.
$hypothesis$ = either the seconder does repress ante or it does beggar Iago or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the ink is a smart and/or is not a kind of a precava. sent2: the ink is a kind of dicotyledonous thing that is not a lyricality. sent3: if the seconder does beggar Iago the ink does beggar Iago. sent4: the seconder does not repress ante and/or is a precava. sent5: that something does repress ante or does beggar Iago or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a precava. sent6: the adducer does not repress ante. sent7: if the ink does not repress ante the seconder is dicotyledonous. sent8: the ink is not smart if it is dicotyledonous and it is not a lyricality. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the ink is not smart.; int1 -> int2: the ink is not a smart or it is not a precava or both.; __UNKNOWN__