the reorientation does not occur.
sent1: that the reciprocalness does not occur and the updating vane does not occur triggers that the updating assignment happens. sent2: the sparging overlay does not occur. sent3: if the sparging fielding does not occur and the sparging overlay does not occur the Leonardesqueness occurs. sent4: that the thoracotomy happens is brought about by that the leafiness happens. sent5: the photovoltaicness does not occur if the leafiness does not occur. sent6: the sparging fielding does not occur. sent7: the updating vane does not occur. sent8: the thoracotomy occurs if that the friction does not occur is true. sent9: the fact that the leafiness occurs and/or the friction does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: the reorientation happens if the updating assignment happens. sent11: that the reciprocal happens and the thoracotomy happens results in that the Leonardesqueness does not occur.
sent9 & sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the thoracotomy occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reciprocal occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the reciprocalness happens and the thoracotomy happens.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the Leonardesqueness does not occur is not wrong.; sent6 & sent2 -> int4: the sparging fielding does not occur and the sparging overlay does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the Leonardesqueness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the reciprocal does not occur.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the reciprocal does not occur and the updating vane does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: that the updating assignment happens is true.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the photovoltaicness does not occur and the cramming does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the reorientation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the reciprocalness does not occur and the updating vane does not occur triggers that the updating assignment happens. sent2: the sparging overlay does not occur. sent3: if the sparging fielding does not occur and the sparging overlay does not occur the Leonardesqueness occurs. sent4: that the thoracotomy happens is brought about by that the leafiness happens. sent5: the photovoltaicness does not occur if the leafiness does not occur. sent6: the sparging fielding does not occur. sent7: the updating vane does not occur. sent8: the thoracotomy occurs if that the friction does not occur is true. sent9: the fact that the leafiness occurs and/or the friction does not occur is not incorrect. sent10: the reorientation happens if the updating assignment happens. sent11: that the reciprocal happens and the thoracotomy happens results in that the Leonardesqueness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the thoracotomy occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reciprocal occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the reciprocalness happens and the thoracotomy happens.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the Leonardesqueness does not occur is not wrong.; sent6 & sent2 -> int4: the sparging fielding does not occur and the sparging overlay does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the Leonardesqueness occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the reciprocal does not occur.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the reciprocal does not occur and the updating vane does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: that the updating assignment happens is true.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__