that there is something such that if it is not non-sapphirine the fact that it is inaccessible and it is not a kind of a mistake is false does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Potorous then the fact that it is a kind of a physa and it is not a molar is incorrect. sent2: if the airbrake is a sapphirine then that it is both piratical and not medicolegal is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a fatality then that it is a communist and is not a chart is wrong. sent4: the fact that the airbrake does reissue preconception and is not a kind of a biennial does not hold if it is a moon-worship. sent5: if the airbrake is sapphirine that it is inaccessible and a mistake does not hold. sent6: that something is not non-confrontational but it is not a stripe does not hold if it is immunological. sent7: that there exists something such that if it does reissue preconception the fact that it is a kind of a dead that is not aphasic does not hold hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a sapphirine the fact that it is inaccessible and it is a mistake is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a axerophthol that it is a Potorous that is not a kiang is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the airbrake is a kind of a sapphirine is right then it is inaccessible and it does not mistake. sent11: if that the fact that the airbrake is not amphitheatric is correct is not correct the fact that it is inaccessible but not a Illicium is false. sent12: the fact that the airbrake is inaccessible but it does not mistake is wrong if it is a sapphirine. sent13: if the fact that the airbrake does squash is not wrong then that it is a mistake but not a moon-worship is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sapphirine it is inaccessible and not a mistake. sent15: the fact that the nigger does spit and is not a mistake is not correct if it is a supervision. sent16: if the airbrake is dipterous the fact that it is a half-moon and not octangular is not correct. sent17: there is something such that if it is postprandial the fact that it is a personal and it is not a fingernail is false. sent18: there is something such that if it is a kind of a succulence that it is purposeful and is not noxious is false. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it is ferromagnetic hold then the fact that it is arborical and it is not a kind of a supervision is incorrect.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is immunological that it is confrontational and is not a stripe is not true.
sent6 -> int1: if the feijoa is not non-immunological then the fact that it is confrontational thing that does not stripe is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not non-sapphirine the fact that it is inaccessible and it is not a kind of a mistake is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Potorous then the fact that it is a kind of a physa and it is not a molar is incorrect. sent2: if the airbrake is a sapphirine then that it is both piratical and not medicolegal is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a fatality then that it is a communist and is not a chart is wrong. sent4: the fact that the airbrake does reissue preconception and is not a kind of a biennial does not hold if it is a moon-worship. sent5: if the airbrake is sapphirine that it is inaccessible and a mistake does not hold. sent6: that something is not non-confrontational but it is not a stripe does not hold if it is immunological. sent7: that there exists something such that if it does reissue preconception the fact that it is a kind of a dead that is not aphasic does not hold hold. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a sapphirine the fact that it is inaccessible and it is a mistake is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a axerophthol that it is a Potorous that is not a kiang is incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the airbrake is a kind of a sapphirine is right then it is inaccessible and it does not mistake. sent11: if that the fact that the airbrake is not amphitheatric is correct is not correct the fact that it is inaccessible but not a Illicium is false. sent12: the fact that the airbrake is inaccessible but it does not mistake is wrong if it is a sapphirine. sent13: if the fact that the airbrake does squash is not wrong then that it is a mistake but not a moon-worship is incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sapphirine it is inaccessible and not a mistake. sent15: the fact that the nigger does spit and is not a mistake is not correct if it is a supervision. sent16: if the airbrake is dipterous the fact that it is a half-moon and not octangular is not correct. sent17: there is something such that if it is postprandial the fact that it is a personal and it is not a fingernail is false. sent18: there is something such that if it is a kind of a succulence that it is purposeful and is not noxious is false. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it is ferromagnetic hold then the fact that it is arborical and it is not a kind of a supervision is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__