the school is not ursine.
sent1: something is ursine if that it is a greengrocery and it does not behoove is incorrect. sent2: the sundowner is a meringue and it is a kind of a Valerianaceae if it does not decoy Philistine. sent3: the sundowner does not decoy Philistine. sent4: the fact that the sundowner does behoove is correct. sent5: if something is not nutritional then that it is a greengrocery and it does not behoove is not correct. sent6: that the langlaufer sterilizes Tantrist is correct. sent7: something is non-nutritional if that it is non-nutritional and it is not a bullace is incorrect. sent8: the langlaufer is not a neostigmine and it does not sterilize Tantrist if the sundowner is not a kind of a greengrocery. sent9: That the Tantrist sterilizes langlaufer is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sundowner is not a kind of a greengrocery.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the langlaufer is not a neostigmine and does not sterilize Tantrist.; int1 -> int2: the langlaufer does not sterilize Tantrist.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sundowner is a greengrocery.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the sundowner is a kind of a greengrocery that behooves.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a kind of a greengrocery that does behoove.;
the school is ursine.
sent1 -> int7: if the fact that the school is a kind of a greengrocery but it does not behoove is not right it is ursine.; sent5 -> int8: that if the fact that the school is not nutritional is not wrong the fact that the school is a kind of a greengrocery but it does not behoove is not right hold.; sent7 -> int9: the school is not nutritional if the fact that it is nutritional and is not a bullace does not hold.; sent2 & sent3 -> int10: the sundowner is a kind of a meringue and it is a kind of a Valerianaceae.; int10 -> int11: the sundowner is a meringue.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is a meringue.;
$hypothesis$ = the school is not ursine. ; $context$ = sent1: something is ursine if that it is a greengrocery and it does not behoove is incorrect. sent2: the sundowner is a meringue and it is a kind of a Valerianaceae if it does not decoy Philistine. sent3: the sundowner does not decoy Philistine. sent4: the fact that the sundowner does behoove is correct. sent5: if something is not nutritional then that it is a greengrocery and it does not behoove is not correct. sent6: that the langlaufer sterilizes Tantrist is correct. sent7: something is non-nutritional if that it is non-nutritional and it is not a bullace is incorrect. sent8: the langlaufer is not a neostigmine and it does not sterilize Tantrist if the sundowner is not a kind of a greengrocery. sent9: That the Tantrist sterilizes langlaufer is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sundowner is not a kind of a greengrocery.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the langlaufer is not a neostigmine and does not sterilize Tantrist.; int1 -> int2: the langlaufer does not sterilize Tantrist.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sundowner is a greengrocery.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the sundowner is a kind of a greengrocery that behooves.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a kind of a greengrocery that does behoove.; __UNKNOWN__