that the gingham is both not a Irelander and incongruous is incorrect.
sent1: the pederasty is not resistless. sent2: that something does not down Aetobatus but it does solve is not true if it does not down duff. sent3: something is resistless if it is not a kind of a nutcracker and does solve. sent4: if there is something such that it does not deck leveler the gingham is resistless and exodontics. sent5: the duff does not down Aetobatus. sent6: something is argentous. sent7: there is something such that that it is a nutcracker is not incorrect. sent8: the chromosphere is not a Irelander. sent9: something is a nutcracker that does solve. sent10: if something does deck leveler and is resistless then it does not down duff. sent11: that the gingham does not down duff is not wrong. sent12: the pederasty is not resistless if the chromosphere downs Aetobatus. sent13: if something does deck leveler then it is not exodontics. sent14: if the fact that the pederasty is either not resistless or not a Chipewyan or both is wrong then the chromosphere is resistless. sent15: the chromosphere does deck leveler. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is not argentous is right then the gingham is both incongruous and a Chipewyan. sent17: if something that does down duff does not deck leveler it does not down Aetobatus. sent18: something solves. sent19: the fact that something is not a Irelander and is incongruous is false if it is not a nutcracker. sent20: the gingham is a Chipewyan if there is something such that it is not argentous. sent21: something is not a Irelander if it is not exodontics. sent22: the gingham is a kind of a Chipewyan. sent23: the pederasty is not resistless and it does not down duff if the chromosphere downs Aetobatus. sent24: the duff is not argentous. sent25: the chromosphere downs Aetobatus if something that is a nutcracker does solve. sent26: if the pederasty does not down Aetobatus the chromosphere is not a kind of a nutcracker and does solve. sent27: the pederasty is non-exodontics. sent28: the gingham decks leveler if the pederasty does not down duff.
sent9 & sent25 -> int1: the chromosphere downs Aetobatus.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the pederasty is not resistless and does not down duff.; int2 -> int3: the pederasty does not down duff.; int3 & sent28 -> int4: the gingham decks leveler.; sent13 -> int5: the gingham is not exodontics if it decks leveler.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gingham is not exodontics.; sent21 -> int7: if the gingham is not exodontics it is not a Irelander.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the gingham is not a Irelander.; sent24 -> int9: there are non-argentous things.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the gingham is both incongruous and a Chipewyan.; int10 -> int11: the gingham is incongruous.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis;
that the gingham is both not a Irelander and incongruous is not correct.
sent19 -> int12: if the gingham is not a nutcracker then the fact that it is not a Irelander but incongruous is false.; sent2 -> int13: if the chromosphere does not down duff then that it does not down Aetobatus and does solve does not hold.; sent10 -> int14: if the chromosphere decks leveler and is resistless it does not down duff.;
$hypothesis$ = that the gingham is both not a Irelander and incongruous is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the pederasty is not resistless. sent2: that something does not down Aetobatus but it does solve is not true if it does not down duff. sent3: something is resistless if it is not a kind of a nutcracker and does solve. sent4: if there is something such that it does not deck leveler the gingham is resistless and exodontics. sent5: the duff does not down Aetobatus. sent6: something is argentous. sent7: there is something such that that it is a nutcracker is not incorrect. sent8: the chromosphere is not a Irelander. sent9: something is a nutcracker that does solve. sent10: if something does deck leveler and is resistless then it does not down duff. sent11: that the gingham does not down duff is not wrong. sent12: the pederasty is not resistless if the chromosphere downs Aetobatus. sent13: if something does deck leveler then it is not exodontics. sent14: if the fact that the pederasty is either not resistless or not a Chipewyan or both is wrong then the chromosphere is resistless. sent15: the chromosphere does deck leveler. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is not argentous is right then the gingham is both incongruous and a Chipewyan. sent17: if something that does down duff does not deck leveler it does not down Aetobatus. sent18: something solves. sent19: the fact that something is not a Irelander and is incongruous is false if it is not a nutcracker. sent20: the gingham is a Chipewyan if there is something such that it is not argentous. sent21: something is not a Irelander if it is not exodontics. sent22: the gingham is a kind of a Chipewyan. sent23: the pederasty is not resistless and it does not down duff if the chromosphere downs Aetobatus. sent24: the duff is not argentous. sent25: the chromosphere downs Aetobatus if something that is a nutcracker does solve. sent26: if the pederasty does not down Aetobatus the chromosphere is not a kind of a nutcracker and does solve. sent27: the pederasty is non-exodontics. sent28: the gingham decks leveler if the pederasty does not down duff. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent25 -> int1: the chromosphere downs Aetobatus.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the pederasty is not resistless and does not down duff.; int2 -> int3: the pederasty does not down duff.; int3 & sent28 -> int4: the gingham decks leveler.; sent13 -> int5: the gingham is not exodontics if it decks leveler.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gingham is not exodontics.; sent21 -> int7: if the gingham is not exodontics it is not a Irelander.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the gingham is not a Irelander.; sent24 -> int9: there are non-argentous things.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: the gingham is both incongruous and a Chipewyan.; int10 -> int11: the gingham is incongruous.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__