the fact that if the basswood is not pictographic the keg is transitive is not correct.
sent1: if there is something such that it does not deflate sulindac the basswood is pictographic. sent2: the keg is advisable thing that does not spiral ply. sent3: the Rus deflates sulindac. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it deflates sulindac and deflates cere is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the cere is a biennial but it is not a transitive is correct. sent6: there is something such that it deflates sulindac and does not deflate cere. sent7: there is something such that that it is pictographic and it does not deflate cere is not true. sent8: if the basswood is pictographic and does not deflate sulindac the Rus deflates cere. sent9: the basswood is pictographic if there is something such that the fact that it does deflate sulindac and does not deflate cere is incorrect. sent10: the cere hooks stairhead and is not a transitive. sent11: if that the Rus is intransitive is correct then the keg does deflate cere. sent12: if the Rus does deflate sulindac but it does not deflate cere then the keg is transitive. sent13: the basswood is not a kind of a Bavarian and is not pictographic if the keg does hook triptych. sent14: the keg is a kind of a transitive if the basswood is pictographic. sent15: the Rus is a kind of an authoritarian and is not menstrual. sent16: the fact that the basswood is a transitive hold. sent17: something hooks triptych if it is a kind of a prancer. sent18: the basswood is transitive if there is something such that that it is pictographic and does not deflate sulindac does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Rus does deflate sulindac and does not deflate cere is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it deflates sulindac and does not deflate cere does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the basswood is pictographic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the basswood is not pictographic.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Rus deflates sulindac but it does not deflate cere.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the keg is transitive.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the blacksnake is not a kind of a transitive.
sent17 -> int6: the keg hooks triptych if it is a kind of a prancer.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the basswood is not pictographic the keg is transitive is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does not deflate sulindac the basswood is pictographic. sent2: the keg is advisable thing that does not spiral ply. sent3: the Rus deflates sulindac. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it deflates sulindac and deflates cere is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the cere is a biennial but it is not a transitive is correct. sent6: there is something such that it deflates sulindac and does not deflate cere. sent7: there is something such that that it is pictographic and it does not deflate cere is not true. sent8: if the basswood is pictographic and does not deflate sulindac the Rus deflates cere. sent9: the basswood is pictographic if there is something such that the fact that it does deflate sulindac and does not deflate cere is incorrect. sent10: the cere hooks stairhead and is not a transitive. sent11: if that the Rus is intransitive is correct then the keg does deflate cere. sent12: if the Rus does deflate sulindac but it does not deflate cere then the keg is transitive. sent13: the basswood is not a kind of a Bavarian and is not pictographic if the keg does hook triptych. sent14: the keg is a kind of a transitive if the basswood is pictographic. sent15: the Rus is a kind of an authoritarian and is not menstrual. sent16: the fact that the basswood is a transitive hold. sent17: something hooks triptych if it is a kind of a prancer. sent18: the basswood is transitive if there is something such that that it is pictographic and does not deflate sulindac does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Rus does deflate sulindac and does not deflate cere is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it deflates sulindac and does not deflate cere does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the basswood is pictographic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the basswood is not pictographic.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Rus deflates sulindac but it does not deflate cere.; sent12 & int4 -> int5: the keg is transitive.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__