the fact that the parsonage is not dominical if the trustee is a squamule is not correct.
sent1: the wordfinder does unscramble if that it is not a piping and is not nocturnal does not hold. sent2: something is a kind of a stinter if the fact that it is not nocturnal and not a piping does not hold. sent3: something that does transfer trustee is weedless. sent4: the fact that the trustee is not nocturnal and is not a piping does not hold if it is a squamule. sent5: the trustee is not dominical if there is something such that it is not a kind of a squamule and it is not a piping. sent6: if something is not unthematic and does not unscramble then the parsonage is not dominical. sent7: something is a kind of a squamule. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a stinter then the wordfinder is not unthematic and does not unscramble.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trustee is a squamule.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the trustee is non-nocturnal but not a piping does not hold.; sent2 -> int2: if that the trustee is not nocturnal and is not a piping is false that it is a stinter hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trustee is a stinter.; int3 -> int4: something is a stinter.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the wordfinder is non-unthematic thing that does not unscramble.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not unthematic and does not unscramble.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the parsonage is not dominical.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the parsonage is not dominical if the trustee is a squamule is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the wordfinder does unscramble if that it is not a piping and is not nocturnal does not hold. sent2: something is a kind of a stinter if the fact that it is not nocturnal and not a piping does not hold. sent3: something that does transfer trustee is weedless. sent4: the fact that the trustee is not nocturnal and is not a piping does not hold if it is a squamule. sent5: the trustee is not dominical if there is something such that it is not a kind of a squamule and it is not a piping. sent6: if something is not unthematic and does not unscramble then the parsonage is not dominical. sent7: something is a kind of a squamule. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a stinter then the wordfinder is not unthematic and does not unscramble. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trustee is a squamule.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the trustee is non-nocturnal but not a piping does not hold.; sent2 -> int2: if that the trustee is not nocturnal and is not a piping is false that it is a stinter hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trustee is a stinter.; int3 -> int4: something is a stinter.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the wordfinder is non-unthematic thing that does not unscramble.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not unthematic and does not unscramble.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the parsonage is not dominical.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__