that the tollgate is porphyritic is not wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Ictonyx and does not reunify Ningal is incorrect. sent2: if the farm is not an affection but it craves the tollgate is porphyritic. sent3: there is something such that that it is ophthalmic and it does not sequence Sherwood is not right. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a purge and it is exuvial is false. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is an iconoclast and it does not crave is wrong. sent6: if there is something such that it is an initiation the farm is not a Ictonyx and not an iconoclast. sent7: if the tollgate is not porphyritic but it is a kind of an affection the farm craves. sent8: the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a purge and it is not exuvial is wrong is not wrong. sent9: the fact that if the farm reunifies Ningal then the farm does crave is not incorrect. sent10: if something is not a Ictonyx and not an iconoclast then it is not an affection. sent11: the farm reunifies Ningal if there exists something such that it is exuvial. sent12: the farm reunifies Ningal if there is something such that that it purges and is not exuvial does not hold.
sent10 -> int1: the farm is not a kind of an affection if it is not a Ictonyx and it is not a kind of an iconoclast.; sent8 & sent12 -> int2: the farm reunifies Ningal.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the farm does crave.;
$hypothesis$ = that the tollgate is porphyritic is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Ictonyx and does not reunify Ningal is incorrect. sent2: if the farm is not an affection but it craves the tollgate is porphyritic. sent3: there is something such that that it is ophthalmic and it does not sequence Sherwood is not right. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a purge and it is exuvial is false. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is an iconoclast and it does not crave is wrong. sent6: if there is something such that it is an initiation the farm is not a Ictonyx and not an iconoclast. sent7: if the tollgate is not porphyritic but it is a kind of an affection the farm craves. sent8: the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a purge and it is not exuvial is wrong is not wrong. sent9: the fact that if the farm reunifies Ningal then the farm does crave is not incorrect. sent10: if something is not a Ictonyx and not an iconoclast then it is not an affection. sent11: the farm reunifies Ningal if there exists something such that it is exuvial. sent12: the farm reunifies Ningal if there is something such that that it purges and is not exuvial does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the farm is not a kind of an affection if it is not a Ictonyx and it is not a kind of an iconoclast.; sent8 & sent12 -> int2: the farm reunifies Ningal.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the farm does crave.; __UNKNOWN__