that the telegrapher is not incomplete and not neurotoxic does not hold.
sent1: the cornu is morphophonemic if that it is a kind of non-morphophonemic thing that begins Winchester does not hold. sent2: the Puritan is not morphophonemic. sent3: if there are non-bentonitic things the telegrapher is a procurator. sent4: the fact that the telegrapher is incomplete but it is not neurotoxic is not right if it is a procurator. sent5: something is not incomplete if that it is bentonitic and is a Tamil does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the masseuse is not non-Tamil is not incorrect then the Puritan is a sociobiologist. sent7: the masseuse is Tamil if the fact that it is bentonitic is not wrong. sent8: the fact that the cornu is morphophonemic and it begins Winchester is not correct. sent9: the fact that something is not incomplete and it is not neurotoxic is not true if it is a procurator. sent10: the fact that the telegrapher is not incomplete and not non-neurotoxic is not right. sent11: if something is a procurator that it is both not incomplete and neurotoxic is false. sent12: that the Puritan is both a sociobiologist and not morphophonemic does not hold if there exists something such that it is morphophonemic. sent13: the fact that the telegrapher is incomplete but it is not neurotoxic is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the masseuse is bentonitic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the masseuse is a Tamil.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the Puritan is a sociobiologist.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Puritan is a kind of a sociobiologist that is not morphophonemic.; sent9 -> int4: if the telegrapher is a procurator that it is both not incomplete and not neurotoxic is wrong.;
the telegrapher is not incomplete and not neurotoxic.
sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the telegrapher is not non-bentonitic and it is a kind of a Tamil is not right then that it is not incomplete is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the telegrapher is not incomplete and not neurotoxic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the cornu is morphophonemic if that it is a kind of non-morphophonemic thing that begins Winchester does not hold. sent2: the Puritan is not morphophonemic. sent3: if there are non-bentonitic things the telegrapher is a procurator. sent4: the fact that the telegrapher is incomplete but it is not neurotoxic is not right if it is a procurator. sent5: something is not incomplete if that it is bentonitic and is a Tamil does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the masseuse is not non-Tamil is not incorrect then the Puritan is a sociobiologist. sent7: the masseuse is Tamil if the fact that it is bentonitic is not wrong. sent8: the fact that the cornu is morphophonemic and it begins Winchester is not correct. sent9: the fact that something is not incomplete and it is not neurotoxic is not true if it is a procurator. sent10: the fact that the telegrapher is not incomplete and not non-neurotoxic is not right. sent11: if something is a procurator that it is both not incomplete and neurotoxic is false. sent12: that the Puritan is both a sociobiologist and not morphophonemic does not hold if there exists something such that it is morphophonemic. sent13: the fact that the telegrapher is incomplete but it is not neurotoxic is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the masseuse is bentonitic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the masseuse is a Tamil.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the Puritan is a sociobiologist.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the Puritan is a kind of a sociobiologist that is not morphophonemic.; sent9 -> int4: if the telegrapher is a procurator that it is both not incomplete and not neurotoxic is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__