that there exists something such that if it is not gnomic the fact that it does collar peck and it is innumerate is incorrect is false.
sent1: if the dry is gnomic then the fact that it does collar peck and it is innumerate is incorrect. sent2: that something is a canicule and is romantic is wrong if it does not collar peck. sent3: the fact that something collars peck and it is innumerate is wrong if it is not non-gnomic. sent4: if something is not gnomic that it does collar peck and is innumerate is incorrect. sent5: if something does not entail Riksmal then that it does auspicate and it is a parsonage does not hold. sent6: if the dry is not gnomic it collars peck and is innumerate. sent7: that the ravigote is a kind of a neurotic that does entail deputation is false if it is not callithumpian. sent8: the fact that something is a Peshawar that is a Ark is false if that it is not a darkness is not wrong. sent9: if the fact that the dry does not collar peck hold then that it is not non-damascene and entails metaknowledge is not right. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not gnomic it does collar peck and is innumerate. sent11: if something is not gnomic then it does collar peck and it is innumerate. sent12: if the sickbay does not rig farmplace that it collars peck and it entails deputation does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is gnomic the fact that it collars peck and it is innumerate is not true. sent14: if the dry is not a kind of a pula that it is innumerate and it is a Peshawar is not true. sent15: there is something such that if it is not ugly the fact that it is a kind of a HF and it is catholic is not true.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the dry collars peck and it is innumerate is not true if it is not gnomic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the marlin is a canicule and a romantic does not hold if it does not collar peck.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not gnomic the fact that it does collar peck and it is innumerate is incorrect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dry is gnomic then the fact that it does collar peck and it is innumerate is incorrect. sent2: that something is a canicule and is romantic is wrong if it does not collar peck. sent3: the fact that something collars peck and it is innumerate is wrong if it is not non-gnomic. sent4: if something is not gnomic that it does collar peck and is innumerate is incorrect. sent5: if something does not entail Riksmal then that it does auspicate and it is a parsonage does not hold. sent6: if the dry is not gnomic it collars peck and is innumerate. sent7: that the ravigote is a kind of a neurotic that does entail deputation is false if it is not callithumpian. sent8: the fact that something is a Peshawar that is a Ark is false if that it is not a darkness is not wrong. sent9: if the fact that the dry does not collar peck hold then that it is not non-damascene and entails metaknowledge is not right. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not gnomic it does collar peck and is innumerate. sent11: if something is not gnomic then it does collar peck and it is innumerate. sent12: if the sickbay does not rig farmplace that it collars peck and it entails deputation does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is gnomic the fact that it collars peck and it is innumerate is not true. sent14: if the dry is not a kind of a pula that it is innumerate and it is a Peshawar is not true. sent15: there is something such that if it is not ugly the fact that it is a kind of a HF and it is catholic is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the dry collars peck and it is innumerate is not true if it is not gnomic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__