that the assassin is not an absorbent is not incorrect.
sent1: the knobble is a kind of non-archaeological thing that is a Bannister. sent2: that something is not vaginal but it is absorbent is false if it is a queen. sent3: the fact that the assassin is a kind of an absorbent that colors Thalassoma does not hold. sent4: the assassin does not culture hound's-tongue. sent5: if that the Hokan does not culture starting but it is a kind of a caddie is wrong the fact that it is archaeological is false. sent6: the bolide is non-archaeological. sent7: the acaricide does color Thalassoma. sent8: the coelogyne is archaeological. sent9: the fact that the assassin is not a matrimony and colors Thalassoma is wrong. sent10: that the sulfide does not green Agonidae but it is archaeological is false. sent11: if the Republican is a depository then that the writer is not archaeological and/or is shallow is not right. sent12: that the retainer is a queen is right if the fact that the writer is not archaeological and/or is shallow does not hold. sent13: if the writer is a kind of archaeological thing that does not queen the assassin is absorbent. sent14: something is archaeological but it is not a queen if that it shallows is not false. sent15: if that the assassin is not a kind of a conto but it does index captopril does not hold then it is not archaeological. sent16: the assassin does color crabbed. sent17: if the fact that the assassin is not a kind of a ceftazidime but it is archaeological is false then that it does color vesuvianite is not true. sent18: the assassin is archaeological. sent19: if the fact that something is a kind of non-absorbent thing that colors Thalassoma is wrong then it is not archaeological. sent20: if the betaine is a depository the Republican is a kind of a depository.
sent19 -> int1: if the fact that the assassin is not a kind of an absorbent and does color Thalassoma is false then it is non-archaeological.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the assassin is not an absorbent and colors Thalassoma is not right is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the assassin is not archaeological.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the assassin is not a kind of an absorbent but it does color Thalassoma.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the assassin is a kind of an absorbent.
sent14 -> int5: the writer is archaeological but it is not a queen if that it is shallow hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the assassin is not an absorbent is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the knobble is a kind of non-archaeological thing that is a Bannister. sent2: that something is not vaginal but it is absorbent is false if it is a queen. sent3: the fact that the assassin is a kind of an absorbent that colors Thalassoma does not hold. sent4: the assassin does not culture hound's-tongue. sent5: if that the Hokan does not culture starting but it is a kind of a caddie is wrong the fact that it is archaeological is false. sent6: the bolide is non-archaeological. sent7: the acaricide does color Thalassoma. sent8: the coelogyne is archaeological. sent9: the fact that the assassin is not a matrimony and colors Thalassoma is wrong. sent10: that the sulfide does not green Agonidae but it is archaeological is false. sent11: if the Republican is a depository then that the writer is not archaeological and/or is shallow is not right. sent12: that the retainer is a queen is right if the fact that the writer is not archaeological and/or is shallow does not hold. sent13: if the writer is a kind of archaeological thing that does not queen the assassin is absorbent. sent14: something is archaeological but it is not a queen if that it shallows is not false. sent15: if that the assassin is not a kind of a conto but it does index captopril does not hold then it is not archaeological. sent16: the assassin does color crabbed. sent17: if the fact that the assassin is not a kind of a ceftazidime but it is archaeological is false then that it does color vesuvianite is not true. sent18: the assassin is archaeological. sent19: if the fact that something is a kind of non-absorbent thing that colors Thalassoma is wrong then it is not archaeological. sent20: if the betaine is a depository the Republican is a kind of a depository. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: if the fact that the assassin is not a kind of an absorbent and does color Thalassoma is false then it is non-archaeological.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the assassin is not an absorbent and colors Thalassoma is not right is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the assassin is not archaeological.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the assassin is not a kind of an absorbent but it does color Thalassoma.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__