the fact that the buckskins is a kind of a agamid and it is a reverse is incorrect.
sent1: something is not a kind of a spree if that it does not wrestle popover and it does not hew does not hold. sent2: if the clostridium is not a kind of a pitting then the fact that it does not wrestle popover and does not hew is not true. sent3: if something is a stove it does not grumble peasanthood and it is not maleficent. sent4: the fact that the cephalochordate is not amygdaline is not wrong. sent5: The peasanthood does grumble buckskins. sent6: if the maypole does not pit but it is distributional the clostridium is not a pit. sent7: something is a agamid and it is not non-reverse if it does not wrestle Bubulcus. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not grumble ugliness and does not stint metalworking is not true then the indinavir is not a quadratics. sent9: the fact that the cephalochordate does not grumble ugliness and does not stint metalworking is not right if it is non-amygdaline. sent10: the buckskins does grumble peasanthood. sent11: the measure does not wrestle Bubulcus if there exists something such that that it does not grumble peasanthood and is maleficent does not hold. sent12: if that the operator is not a plug and not incomplete is not right then the popover is not a plug. sent13: if the popover is not a kind of a plug the maypole is not a pitting and is distributional. sent14: something does not wrestle Bubulcus if that it is not a clash and is proactive is false. sent15: the WIMP is a stove and it does grumble Sauk if there exists something such that it is not a spree. sent16: if the indinavir is non-quadratics the fact that the operator is not a plug and it is not incomplete is not right. sent17: the fact that the measure is a kind of a reverse that wrestles Bubulcus is wrong if the fact that the WIMP does not grumble peasanthood is true. sent18: if the buckskins does grumble peasanthood that it does not clash and it is proactive is not true. sent19: if something is a stove then that it does not grumble peasanthood and it is maleficent is false. sent20: the languisher is a agamid if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a reverse and it does wrestle Bubulcus is not right.
sent14 -> int1: the buckskins does not wrestle Bubulcus if that it is not a kind of a clash and is proactive is wrong.; sent18 & sent10 -> int2: that the buckskins is not a clash but it is proactive is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the buckskins does not wrestle Bubulcus hold.; sent7 -> int4: the buckskins is both a agamid and reverse if it does not wrestle Bubulcus.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the buckskins is a kind of a agamid and it is a reverse is true is incorrect.
sent19 -> int5: that the WIMP does not grumble peasanthood and is maleficent is incorrect if it is a stove.; sent1 -> int6: if that the clostridium does not wrestle popover and it does not hew is incorrect then it is not a spree.; sent9 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the cephalochordate does not grumble ugliness and does not stint metalworking is not true.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that that it does not grumble ugliness and it does not stint metalworking is correct is false.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the indinavir is not a quadratics.; sent16 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the operator is not a plug and it is not incomplete is false.; sent12 & int10 -> int11: the popover is not a plug.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the maypole does not pit and is distributional.; sent6 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the clostridium is not a pitting is not false.; sent2 & int13 -> int14: that the clostridium does not wrestle popover and it does not hew is false.; int6 & int14 -> int15: the clostridium is not a kind of a spree.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that that it is a spree is false.; int16 & sent15 -> int17: the WIMP is a stove that does grumble Sauk.; int17 -> int18: the WIMP is a stove.; int5 & int18 -> int19: the fact that the WIMP does not grumble peasanthood but it is maleficent is false.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that that it does not grumble peasanthood and it is maleficent does not hold.; int20 & sent11 -> int21: the measure does not wrestle Bubulcus.; int21 -> int22: something does not wrestle Bubulcus.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the buckskins is a kind of a agamid and it is a reverse is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a spree if that it does not wrestle popover and it does not hew does not hold. sent2: if the clostridium is not a kind of a pitting then the fact that it does not wrestle popover and does not hew is not true. sent3: if something is a stove it does not grumble peasanthood and it is not maleficent. sent4: the fact that the cephalochordate is not amygdaline is not wrong. sent5: The peasanthood does grumble buckskins. sent6: if the maypole does not pit but it is distributional the clostridium is not a pit. sent7: something is a agamid and it is not non-reverse if it does not wrestle Bubulcus. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not grumble ugliness and does not stint metalworking is not true then the indinavir is not a quadratics. sent9: the fact that the cephalochordate does not grumble ugliness and does not stint metalworking is not right if it is non-amygdaline. sent10: the buckskins does grumble peasanthood. sent11: the measure does not wrestle Bubulcus if there exists something such that that it does not grumble peasanthood and is maleficent does not hold. sent12: if that the operator is not a plug and not incomplete is not right then the popover is not a plug. sent13: if the popover is not a kind of a plug the maypole is not a pitting and is distributional. sent14: something does not wrestle Bubulcus if that it is not a clash and is proactive is false. sent15: the WIMP is a stove and it does grumble Sauk if there exists something such that it is not a spree. sent16: if the indinavir is non-quadratics the fact that the operator is not a plug and it is not incomplete is not right. sent17: the fact that the measure is a kind of a reverse that wrestles Bubulcus is wrong if the fact that the WIMP does not grumble peasanthood is true. sent18: if the buckskins does grumble peasanthood that it does not clash and it is proactive is not true. sent19: if something is a stove then that it does not grumble peasanthood and it is maleficent is false. sent20: the languisher is a agamid if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a reverse and it does wrestle Bubulcus is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the buckskins does not wrestle Bubulcus if that it is not a kind of a clash and is proactive is wrong.; sent18 & sent10 -> int2: that the buckskins is not a clash but it is proactive is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the buckskins does not wrestle Bubulcus hold.; sent7 -> int4: the buckskins is both a agamid and reverse if it does not wrestle Bubulcus.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__