that if the deducing Brioschi does not occur then the picnicking occurs but the deducing Fennic does not occur is not right.
sent1: that the picnic occurs and the deducing Fennic does not occur is triggered by that the deducing Brioschi occurs. sent2: the deducing Fennic does not occur. sent3: the liplessness does not occur. sent4: the mealiness does not occur. sent5: the immortalizing nimblewill occurs. sent6: the fact that the deducing Brioschi and the immortalizing nimblewill happens is right if the picnic does not occur. sent7: the checkmating biography happens. sent8: the reveille and the deducing processing happens if the equalization does not occur. sent9: if the twining does not occur the fact that the lesserness occurs is right. sent10: if that the deducing Fennic occurs and the picnic does not occur is not correct the immortalizing Sue happens. sent11: if the asceticness does not occur then the fact that the deducing Fennic but not the picnic happens is false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the picnicking does not occur.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: both the deducing Brioschi and the immortalizing nimblewill occurs.; int1 -> int2: the deducing Brioschi occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deducing Brioschi does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the picnicking happens.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the picnic occurs but the deducing Fennic does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the immortalizing Sue happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if the deducing Brioschi does not occur then the picnicking occurs but the deducing Fennic does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the picnic occurs and the deducing Fennic does not occur is triggered by that the deducing Brioschi occurs. sent2: the deducing Fennic does not occur. sent3: the liplessness does not occur. sent4: the mealiness does not occur. sent5: the immortalizing nimblewill occurs. sent6: the fact that the deducing Brioschi and the immortalizing nimblewill happens is right if the picnic does not occur. sent7: the checkmating biography happens. sent8: the reveille and the deducing processing happens if the equalization does not occur. sent9: if the twining does not occur the fact that the lesserness occurs is right. sent10: if that the deducing Fennic occurs and the picnic does not occur is not correct the immortalizing Sue happens. sent11: if the asceticness does not occur then the fact that the deducing Fennic but not the picnic happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the picnicking does not occur.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: both the deducing Brioschi and the immortalizing nimblewill occurs.; int1 -> int2: the deducing Brioschi occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deducing Brioschi does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the picnicking happens.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the picnic occurs but the deducing Fennic does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__