the fact that that the sulfur is not a kind of a polytonality but it is a hulking is wrong if the Congo is a faint is incorrect.
sent1: the Congo does guarantee catalufa if the star is a kind of a faint. sent2: if a disequilibrium does faint it does not honey. sent3: the Congo is not a kind of a polytonality. sent4: the sulfur is not a polytonality but a hulking. sent5: the star does not queen longness but it honeys if the sulfur is a polytonality. sent6: if the Congo is not a polytonality the sulfur is not a disequilibrium and does queen longness. sent7: the fact that the Congo is not a faint but a hulking does not hold. sent8: the sulfur is a kind of a faint that is a timework. sent9: that the star does not queen longness and it does not guarantee catalufa is not right. sent10: the fact that the star is not a disequilibrium and queens longness does not hold. sent11: the Congo is a kind of a polytonality if that the star is not a honeydew and does not queen longness does not hold. sent12: the sulfur does honey. sent13: that the sulfur is not a kind of a hulking and does not guarantee catalufa is not true. sent14: if the fact that the sulfur does not queen longness and it is not a honeydew is incorrect then the star is a polytonality. sent15: the sulfur is a hulking and does honey. sent16: that the Congo does not queen longness and is a faint is not right. sent17: if something that does guarantee catalufa is a hulking it is not a kind of a polytonality. sent18: if the Congo is a faint then the fact that the sulfur is a polytonality that is a hulking is not right. sent19: if the sulfur is not a faint the Congo is not a polytonality and is a hulking. sent20: that the fact that the star queens longness but it does not guarantee catalufa is not true is not incorrect. sent21: the Congo is a disequilibrium if that the star does not queen longness and does not guarantee catalufa is not correct. sent22: the Congo does queen colorimetry. sent23: something is not a honeydew if it is a hulking and is a polytonality. sent24: that the sulfur is not a polytonality but it is a kind of a hulking is wrong if the Congo is not a honeydew.
sent21 & sent9 -> int1: the Congo is a disequilibrium.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Congo faints.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Congo is a disequilibrium and it faints.; sent2 -> int3: the Congo is not a honeydew if it is a kind of a disequilibrium that does faint.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Congo is not a honeydew.; int4 & sent24 -> int5: the fact that the sulfur is not a polytonality and is a kind of a hulking is not true.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the sulfur is not a kind of a polytonality but it is a hulking is wrong if the Congo is a faint is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Congo does guarantee catalufa if the star is a kind of a faint. sent2: if a disequilibrium does faint it does not honey. sent3: the Congo is not a kind of a polytonality. sent4: the sulfur is not a polytonality but a hulking. sent5: the star does not queen longness but it honeys if the sulfur is a polytonality. sent6: if the Congo is not a polytonality the sulfur is not a disequilibrium and does queen longness. sent7: the fact that the Congo is not a faint but a hulking does not hold. sent8: the sulfur is a kind of a faint that is a timework. sent9: that the star does not queen longness and it does not guarantee catalufa is not right. sent10: the fact that the star is not a disequilibrium and queens longness does not hold. sent11: the Congo is a kind of a polytonality if that the star is not a honeydew and does not queen longness does not hold. sent12: the sulfur does honey. sent13: that the sulfur is not a kind of a hulking and does not guarantee catalufa is not true. sent14: if the fact that the sulfur does not queen longness and it is not a honeydew is incorrect then the star is a polytonality. sent15: the sulfur is a hulking and does honey. sent16: that the Congo does not queen longness and is a faint is not right. sent17: if something that does guarantee catalufa is a hulking it is not a kind of a polytonality. sent18: if the Congo is a faint then the fact that the sulfur is a polytonality that is a hulking is not right. sent19: if the sulfur is not a faint the Congo is not a polytonality and is a hulking. sent20: that the fact that the star queens longness but it does not guarantee catalufa is not true is not incorrect. sent21: the Congo is a disequilibrium if that the star does not queen longness and does not guarantee catalufa is not correct. sent22: the Congo does queen colorimetry. sent23: something is not a honeydew if it is a hulking and is a polytonality. sent24: that the sulfur is not a polytonality but it is a kind of a hulking is wrong if the Congo is not a honeydew. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent9 -> int1: the Congo is a disequilibrium.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Congo faints.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Congo is a disequilibrium and it faints.; sent2 -> int3: the Congo is not a honeydew if it is a kind of a disequilibrium that does faint.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Congo is not a honeydew.; int4 & sent24 -> int5: the fact that the sulfur is not a polytonality and is a kind of a hulking is not true.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__