the snuffling densitometry happens.
sent1: the corpuscularness does not occur and the undergrowing happens. sent2: if the aerophilately occurs the birth happens. sent3: if the championing callosity occurs then the trihydroxiness happens or the symbolicness does not occur or both. sent4: if the swabbing occurs and the symbolicness occurs then the trihydroxiness does not occur. sent5: both the reciprocating pantothen and the scintillation happens if the corpuscularness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the assertion and the undergrowing occurs is not right then the undergrowing does not occur. sent7: the aerophilately occurs. sent8: if the birth happens then the swabbing occurs. sent9: the snuffling densitometry does not occur if the championing callosity does not occur and the reciprocating carol does not occur. sent10: if the scintillation does not occur the corpuscularness occurs and/or the reciprocating pantothen does not occur. sent11: that the swabbing does not occur causes that the aerophilately happens and/or that the birth does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the aneroid and the scintillation happens is not true the scintillation does not occur. sent13: if the corpuscularness occurs or the reciprocating pantothen does not occur or both the fact that the reciprocating pantothen does not occur is not wrong. sent14: if the astringentness does not occur the fact that that the assertion occurs and the undergrowing occurs is wrong is correct. sent15: the trihydroxiness is brought about by that the reciprocating pantothen occurs. sent16: the fact that both the aneroidness and the scintillation occurs is not true if the undergrowing does not occur. sent17: if the symbolicness does not occur then the championing callosity does not occur and the reciprocating carol does not occur. sent18: if the fox-trot does not occur then the astringent does not occur but the Pasteurianness occurs.
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the birth happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the swabbing happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the symbolicness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the swabbing and the symbolicness happens.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the trihydroxiness does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the corpuscularness does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the reciprocating pantothen happens and the scintillation happens.; int6 -> int7: the reciprocating pantothen happens.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the trihydroxiness happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the symbolicness does not occur.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the championing callosity does not occur and the reciprocating carol does not occur.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the snuffling densitometry happens.
$hypothesis$ = the snuffling densitometry happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the corpuscularness does not occur and the undergrowing happens. sent2: if the aerophilately occurs the birth happens. sent3: if the championing callosity occurs then the trihydroxiness happens or the symbolicness does not occur or both. sent4: if the swabbing occurs and the symbolicness occurs then the trihydroxiness does not occur. sent5: both the reciprocating pantothen and the scintillation happens if the corpuscularness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the assertion and the undergrowing occurs is not right then the undergrowing does not occur. sent7: the aerophilately occurs. sent8: if the birth happens then the swabbing occurs. sent9: the snuffling densitometry does not occur if the championing callosity does not occur and the reciprocating carol does not occur. sent10: if the scintillation does not occur the corpuscularness occurs and/or the reciprocating pantothen does not occur. sent11: that the swabbing does not occur causes that the aerophilately happens and/or that the birth does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the aneroid and the scintillation happens is not true the scintillation does not occur. sent13: if the corpuscularness occurs or the reciprocating pantothen does not occur or both the fact that the reciprocating pantothen does not occur is not wrong. sent14: if the astringentness does not occur the fact that that the assertion occurs and the undergrowing occurs is wrong is correct. sent15: the trihydroxiness is brought about by that the reciprocating pantothen occurs. sent16: the fact that both the aneroidness and the scintillation occurs is not true if the undergrowing does not occur. sent17: if the symbolicness does not occur then the championing callosity does not occur and the reciprocating carol does not occur. sent18: if the fox-trot does not occur then the astringent does not occur but the Pasteurianness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the birth happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the swabbing happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the symbolicness occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: both the swabbing and the symbolicness happens.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the trihydroxiness does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the corpuscularness does not occur.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the reciprocating pantothen happens and the scintillation happens.; int6 -> int7: the reciprocating pantothen happens.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the trihydroxiness happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the symbolicness does not occur.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the championing callosity does not occur and the reciprocating carol does not occur.; int11 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__