the mother-in-law is not a kind of a percoid.
sent1: something is not a percoid if that it does not deviate Achoerodus and is not noncrystalline is false. sent2: that the silo is informative is right if there exists something such that that it is not informative and is a kind of a Blake is not true. sent3: if the mother-in-law does not deviate Achoerodus and is not noncrystalline then the silo is not informative. sent4: that something is a Blake but it does not hollo is not right if it is not a start. sent5: if something does deviate flywheel then it is not nephritic. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not informative and it is a Blake does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Venezuela and is Vedic does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mother-in-law does not deviate Achoerodus and it is not noncrystalline.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the silo is not informative.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the silo is informative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the mother-in-law does not deviate Achoerodus and is not noncrystalline is not true.; sent1 -> int5: the mother-in-law is not a percoid if that it does not deviate Achoerodus and is not noncrystalline is not true.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the mother-in-law is a percoid.
sent4 -> int6: if the flywheel does not start then that it is a kind of a Blake that does not hollo does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the mother-in-law is not a kind of a percoid. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a percoid if that it does not deviate Achoerodus and is not noncrystalline is false. sent2: that the silo is informative is right if there exists something such that that it is not informative and is a kind of a Blake is not true. sent3: if the mother-in-law does not deviate Achoerodus and is not noncrystalline then the silo is not informative. sent4: that something is a Blake but it does not hollo is not right if it is not a start. sent5: if something does deviate flywheel then it is not nephritic. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not informative and it is a Blake does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Venezuela and is Vedic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mother-in-law does not deviate Achoerodus and it is not noncrystalline.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the silo is not informative.; sent6 & sent2 -> int2: the silo is informative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the mother-in-law does not deviate Achoerodus and is not noncrystalline is not true.; sent1 -> int5: the mother-in-law is not a percoid if that it does not deviate Achoerodus and is not noncrystalline is not true.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__