that the fact that the jumbling does not occur and the slackening does not occur is not false is wrong.
sent1: the soldiering occurs if the unresentfulness does not occur. sent2: that not the prelacy but the synchronousness occurs is false. sent3: the fact that the jumbling but not the slackening happens does not hold. sent4: the glovelessness happens but the Hunt does not occur. sent5: that not the jumble but the slackening occurs is not true if the soldier happens. sent6: the pyrochemicalness happens. sent7: the protrusiveness happens. sent8: the fact that the biblessness happens and the ferrimagnetism does not occur does not hold if the fact that the factorizing mexiletine happens is not false. sent9: if the circling Issus happens but the awarding genesis does not occur the classical occurs. sent10: the coeliacness occurs and the device occurs. sent11: if the agitating happens not the soldier but the orthodonticness happens. sent12: the circling Issus but not the awarding genesis happens if the blackjack does not occur. sent13: if that the soldier does not occur is correct then that the unresentfulness does not occur and the rediscovery does not occur is not true. sent14: both the awarding viticulturist and the intralinguisticness happens. sent15: the orthodonticness happens and the rediscovery occurs. sent16: the northeaster does not occur. sent17: that the circling erythropoietin does not occur and the discipline does not occur is not true. sent18: the femoralness occurs. sent19: both the professing and the hospitalization happens. sent20: if that the circling Issus and the awarding genesis happens hold then the classicalness occurs. sent21: if the fact that the circling Issus does not occur or the blackjack happens or both does not hold the awarding genesis does not occur. sent22: if the bibliothecalness does not occur then the boricness but not the irruption happens. sent23: if the awarding Savoy occurs then that the awarding radio-phonograph does not occur and the distraction does not occur is not correct. sent24: the blackjack does not occur if the awarding viticulturist and the intralinguisticness happens. sent25: if the soldier occurs then that the jumbling does not occur and the slackening does not occur is not true.
sent24 & sent14 -> int1: the blackjack does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the circling Issus occurs and the awarding genesis does not occur is right.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the classical occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unresentfulness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the classical and the unresentfulness occurs.; sent15 -> int5: the rediscovery happens.;
the jumbling does not occur and the slackening does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the jumbling does not occur and the slackening does not occur is not false is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the soldiering occurs if the unresentfulness does not occur. sent2: that not the prelacy but the synchronousness occurs is false. sent3: the fact that the jumbling but not the slackening happens does not hold. sent4: the glovelessness happens but the Hunt does not occur. sent5: that not the jumble but the slackening occurs is not true if the soldier happens. sent6: the pyrochemicalness happens. sent7: the protrusiveness happens. sent8: the fact that the biblessness happens and the ferrimagnetism does not occur does not hold if the fact that the factorizing mexiletine happens is not false. sent9: if the circling Issus happens but the awarding genesis does not occur the classical occurs. sent10: the coeliacness occurs and the device occurs. sent11: if the agitating happens not the soldier but the orthodonticness happens. sent12: the circling Issus but not the awarding genesis happens if the blackjack does not occur. sent13: if that the soldier does not occur is correct then that the unresentfulness does not occur and the rediscovery does not occur is not true. sent14: both the awarding viticulturist and the intralinguisticness happens. sent15: the orthodonticness happens and the rediscovery occurs. sent16: the northeaster does not occur. sent17: that the circling erythropoietin does not occur and the discipline does not occur is not true. sent18: the femoralness occurs. sent19: both the professing and the hospitalization happens. sent20: if that the circling Issus and the awarding genesis happens hold then the classicalness occurs. sent21: if the fact that the circling Issus does not occur or the blackjack happens or both does not hold the awarding genesis does not occur. sent22: if the bibliothecalness does not occur then the boricness but not the irruption happens. sent23: if the awarding Savoy occurs then that the awarding radio-phonograph does not occur and the distraction does not occur is not correct. sent24: the blackjack does not occur if the awarding viticulturist and the intralinguisticness happens. sent25: if the soldier occurs then that the jumbling does not occur and the slackening does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent14 -> int1: the blackjack does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the circling Issus occurs and the awarding genesis does not occur is right.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the classical occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unresentfulness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: both the classical and the unresentfulness occurs.; sent15 -> int5: the rediscovery happens.; __UNKNOWN__