the kinestheticness does not occur and the powwowing subdivider happens if the sidestep does not occur.
sent1: if that the drippings does not occur and the squeegeeing cortex does not occur is wrong then that the sidestep happens is not false. sent2: if the apogamicness does not occur then that both the non-anureticness and the non-prefecturalness happens is wrong. sent3: that the unholyness and the externalization occurs is brought about by the non-polymorphicness. sent4: the fact that not the drippings but the squeegeeing cortex occurs is not true. sent5: the molestation occurs. sent6: both the arrest and the anserineness happens. sent7: the Vietnamese occurs. sent8: the cadetship occurs. sent9: the squeegeeing clowder does not occur if both the cationicness and the Czech occurs. sent10: if the fact that the non-Quechuanness and the non-peritonealness happens does not hold then the fertileness occurs. sent11: the fact that the drippings does not occur but the squeegeeing cortex happens is not right if the powwowing subdivider does not occur. sent12: the describing occurs and the bioassay happens. sent13: if the powwowing subdivider does not occur that the drippings does not occur and the squeegeeing cortex does not occur is false. sent14: the confidentness happens. sent15: the vagalness happens if that the raftering demodulation does not occur and the heavy-dutiness does not occur is not right. sent16: the leaner happens and the cadetship occurs. sent17: that not the kinestheticness but the powwowing subdivider occurs is caused by that the sidestep occurs. sent18: the Mishnaicness happens. sent19: the interviewing happens and the Vietnameseness happens. sent20: the squeegeeing cortex triggers that the sidestep happens. sent21: that the enraging happens and the leaner occurs prevents that the kinestheticness occurs. sent22: the enraging happens if the interviewing occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the powwowing subdivider does not occur.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: that the drippings does not occur and the squeegeeing cortex does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the sidestep occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sidestep does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the powwowing subdivider occurs.; sent19 -> int5: the interviewing happens.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the enraging occurs.; sent16 -> int7: the leaner happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that both the enraging and the leaner happens is right.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the kinestheticness does not occur.; int4 & int9 -> int10: that the non-kinestheticness and the powwowing subdivider occurs is true.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the kinestheticness does not occur and the powwowing subdivider happens if the sidestep does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the drippings does not occur and the squeegeeing cortex does not occur is wrong then that the sidestep happens is not false. sent2: if the apogamicness does not occur then that both the non-anureticness and the non-prefecturalness happens is wrong. sent3: that the unholyness and the externalization occurs is brought about by the non-polymorphicness. sent4: the fact that not the drippings but the squeegeeing cortex occurs is not true. sent5: the molestation occurs. sent6: both the arrest and the anserineness happens. sent7: the Vietnamese occurs. sent8: the cadetship occurs. sent9: the squeegeeing clowder does not occur if both the cationicness and the Czech occurs. sent10: if the fact that the non-Quechuanness and the non-peritonealness happens does not hold then the fertileness occurs. sent11: the fact that the drippings does not occur but the squeegeeing cortex happens is not right if the powwowing subdivider does not occur. sent12: the describing occurs and the bioassay happens. sent13: if the powwowing subdivider does not occur that the drippings does not occur and the squeegeeing cortex does not occur is false. sent14: the confidentness happens. sent15: the vagalness happens if that the raftering demodulation does not occur and the heavy-dutiness does not occur is not right. sent16: the leaner happens and the cadetship occurs. sent17: that not the kinestheticness but the powwowing subdivider occurs is caused by that the sidestep occurs. sent18: the Mishnaicness happens. sent19: the interviewing happens and the Vietnameseness happens. sent20: the squeegeeing cortex triggers that the sidestep happens. sent21: that the enraging happens and the leaner occurs prevents that the kinestheticness occurs. sent22: the enraging happens if the interviewing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the powwowing subdivider does not occur.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: that the drippings does not occur and the squeegeeing cortex does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the sidestep occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sidestep does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the powwowing subdivider occurs.; sent19 -> int5: the interviewing happens.; sent22 & int5 -> int6: the enraging occurs.; sent16 -> int7: the leaner happens.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that both the enraging and the leaner happens is right.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the kinestheticness does not occur.; int4 & int9 -> int10: that the non-kinestheticness and the powwowing subdivider occurs is true.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__