that there is something such that if it is not paramilitary then it does move and is antiferromagnetic is not true.
sent1: there is nothing that is not a hoard but a move. sent2: if that something is non-antiferromagnetic thing that does not outshout cooler does not hold the fact that it is antiferromagnetic is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that there is something such that if it is a paramilitary then it is a kind of a move and it is antiferromagnetic is not incorrect. sent4: the hind is nonresidential. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a paramilitary it is antiferromagnetic. sent6: if the hind is not antiferromagnetic then it is a paramilitary. sent7: the skein does not move. sent8: the hind does outshout gumbo-limbo and it is a kind of a percept. sent9: if the hind is not non-paramilitary then it is a move and it is antiferromagnetic. sent10: that something is not a move and not navigational does not hold if it is a hoard. sent11: the hind does nitrify and it is tactless. sent12: the fact that the hind does move but it is not navigational does not hold. sent13: if the hind does hoard that it is a move and it is not navigational is false. sent14: the fact that something is both a move and not navigational is not true if it is a hoard. sent15: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a paramilitary the fact that it is a kind of a move is not false hold. sent16: something moves if that it is both not a moves and non-navigational is not correct. sent17: the soil is a cat's-paw and it is a daguerreotype. sent18: the apomorphine is anamorphic. sent19: the hind is a hoard that is anamorphic. sent20: the hind is anamorphic. sent21: something outshouts imperative if the fact that it does not outshouts imperative and it is not cyclic is wrong. sent22: the hind is a kind of a nonprofit. sent23: if that the hind is not anamorphic and it does not bear allomorph does not hold then it is anamorphic.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hind is not antiferromagnetic.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: that the hind is paramilitary is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hind is not a paramilitary.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the hind is antiferromagnetic.; sent16 -> int4: that that the hind is the move hold if that the hind is both not a move and not navigational is incorrect hold.; sent10 -> int5: the fact that the hind is not a move and it is not navigational is not right if it does hoard.; sent19 -> int6: the hind is a kind of a hoard.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the hind is both not a move and not navigational does not hold.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the hind does move.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the hind is a kind of a move and it is antiferromagnetic.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: if the hind is not paramilitary then it moves and it is antiferromagnetic.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the gumbo-limbo is antiferromagnetic.
sent1 -> int11: that the hind is both not a hoard and a move is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not paramilitary then it does move and is antiferromagnetic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing that is not a hoard but a move. sent2: if that something is non-antiferromagnetic thing that does not outshout cooler does not hold the fact that it is antiferromagnetic is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that there is something such that if it is a paramilitary then it is a kind of a move and it is antiferromagnetic is not incorrect. sent4: the hind is nonresidential. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a paramilitary it is antiferromagnetic. sent6: if the hind is not antiferromagnetic then it is a paramilitary. sent7: the skein does not move. sent8: the hind does outshout gumbo-limbo and it is a kind of a percept. sent9: if the hind is not non-paramilitary then it is a move and it is antiferromagnetic. sent10: that something is not a move and not navigational does not hold if it is a hoard. sent11: the hind does nitrify and it is tactless. sent12: the fact that the hind does move but it is not navigational does not hold. sent13: if the hind does hoard that it is a move and it is not navigational is false. sent14: the fact that something is both a move and not navigational is not true if it is a hoard. sent15: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a paramilitary the fact that it is a kind of a move is not false hold. sent16: something moves if that it is both not a moves and non-navigational is not correct. sent17: the soil is a cat's-paw and it is a daguerreotype. sent18: the apomorphine is anamorphic. sent19: the hind is a hoard that is anamorphic. sent20: the hind is anamorphic. sent21: something outshouts imperative if the fact that it does not outshouts imperative and it is not cyclic is wrong. sent22: the hind is a kind of a nonprofit. sent23: if that the hind is not anamorphic and it does not bear allomorph does not hold then it is anamorphic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hind is not antiferromagnetic.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: that the hind is paramilitary is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hind is not a paramilitary.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the hind is antiferromagnetic.; sent16 -> int4: that that the hind is the move hold if that the hind is both not a move and not navigational is incorrect hold.; sent10 -> int5: the fact that the hind is not a move and it is not navigational is not right if it does hoard.; sent19 -> int6: the hind is a kind of a hoard.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the hind is both not a move and not navigational does not hold.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the hind does move.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the hind is a kind of a move and it is antiferromagnetic.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: if the hind is not paramilitary then it moves and it is antiferromagnetic.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__