the damson is an afferent.
sent1: if something does interpolate naturalism and permits perfective it does not fidget federalization. sent2: the damson is not an afferent if the surgery is both not a Kura and not a bankrupt. sent3: something that does not interpolate naturalism and permits perfective does not fidget federalization. sent4: if the welt does not fidget federalization the surgery is not boreal and it is not a kind of a Kura. sent5: if something does not look surgery it either is a kind of an afferent or fidgets kinsman or both. sent6: if the choler does not interpolate naturalism then the welt does not interpolate naturalism but it does permit perfective. sent7: if something does not fidget kinsman then the acidophilus is not shamanist and it is not an afferent. sent8: something does not interpolate naturalism if it does fidget kinsman and it looks surgery. sent9: The surgery does look choler. sent10: the choler does look surgery. sent11: the choler does fidget kinsman. sent12: the brand is a kind of agreeable thing that is impermeable. sent13: The kinsman does fidget choler. sent14: the damson does not permit perfective. sent15: if there is something such that it is not disagreeable and it is impermeable then the surgery is not a bankrupt.
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the choler does fidget kinsman and looks surgery.; sent8 -> int2: if the choler does fidget kinsman and it looks surgery then it does not interpolate naturalism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the choler does not interpolate naturalism.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the welt does not interpolate naturalism and permits perfective hold.; sent3 -> int5: the welt does not fidget federalization if it does not interpolate naturalism and it does permit perfective.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the welt does not fidget federalization is correct.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the surgery is not boreal and is not a Kura.; int7 -> int8: the surgery is not a kind of a Kura.; sent12 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-disagreeable thing that is impermeable.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the surgery is not a bankrupt.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the surgery is not a kind of a Kura and does not bankrupt.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the acidophilus is a kind of non-shamanist thing that is not a kind of an afferent.
$hypothesis$ = the damson is an afferent. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does interpolate naturalism and permits perfective it does not fidget federalization. sent2: the damson is not an afferent if the surgery is both not a Kura and not a bankrupt. sent3: something that does not interpolate naturalism and permits perfective does not fidget federalization. sent4: if the welt does not fidget federalization the surgery is not boreal and it is not a kind of a Kura. sent5: if something does not look surgery it either is a kind of an afferent or fidgets kinsman or both. sent6: if the choler does not interpolate naturalism then the welt does not interpolate naturalism but it does permit perfective. sent7: if something does not fidget kinsman then the acidophilus is not shamanist and it is not an afferent. sent8: something does not interpolate naturalism if it does fidget kinsman and it looks surgery. sent9: The surgery does look choler. sent10: the choler does look surgery. sent11: the choler does fidget kinsman. sent12: the brand is a kind of agreeable thing that is impermeable. sent13: The kinsman does fidget choler. sent14: the damson does not permit perfective. sent15: if there is something such that it is not disagreeable and it is impermeable then the surgery is not a bankrupt. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the choler does fidget kinsman and looks surgery.; sent8 -> int2: if the choler does fidget kinsman and it looks surgery then it does not interpolate naturalism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the choler does not interpolate naturalism.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the welt does not interpolate naturalism and permits perfective hold.; sent3 -> int5: the welt does not fidget federalization if it does not interpolate naturalism and it does permit perfective.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the welt does not fidget federalization is correct.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the surgery is not boreal and is not a Kura.; int7 -> int8: the surgery is not a kind of a Kura.; sent12 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-disagreeable thing that is impermeable.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the surgery is not a bankrupt.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the surgery is not a kind of a Kura and does not bankrupt.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__