the defecation is a kind of a jalapeno.
sent1: if the fact that the imago is immoral and does not fantasize is not false the defecation does not fantasize. sent2: the sandwich is not Skinnerian. sent3: if the fact that either the serow does not fantasize or it does not stink or both is wrong the defecation is a jalapeno. sent4: the imago is an open. sent5: the fact that something is both not Skinnerian and a dale is wrong if it is not immoral. sent6: the defecation is a kind of a dale. sent7: the serow fantasizes. sent8: the serow does fantasize if the imago does fantasize. sent9: that the imago does fantasize hold if the sandwich is immoral. sent10: the sandwich is a dale.
sent5 -> int1: if the sandwich is moral that it is non-Skinnerian and is a dale is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sandwich is not immoral.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the sandwich is not Skinnerian but it is a kind of a dale is wrong.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the sandwich is not a Skinnerian but it is a dale.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sandwich is immoral.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the imago does fantasize.;
the defecation does not fantasize.
$hypothesis$ = the defecation is a kind of a jalapeno. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the imago is immoral and does not fantasize is not false the defecation does not fantasize. sent2: the sandwich is not Skinnerian. sent3: if the fact that either the serow does not fantasize or it does not stink or both is wrong the defecation is a jalapeno. sent4: the imago is an open. sent5: the fact that something is both not Skinnerian and a dale is wrong if it is not immoral. sent6: the defecation is a kind of a dale. sent7: the serow fantasizes. sent8: the serow does fantasize if the imago does fantasize. sent9: that the imago does fantasize hold if the sandwich is immoral. sent10: the sandwich is a dale. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the sandwich is moral that it is non-Skinnerian and is a dale is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sandwich is not immoral.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the sandwich is not Skinnerian but it is a kind of a dale is wrong.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the sandwich is not a Skinnerian but it is a dale.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sandwich is immoral.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the imago does fantasize.; __UNKNOWN__