the haircut does not encircle buffalo.
sent1: the fact that if the stayer does encircle gloom the haircut does not encircle gloom and is quantitative is right. sent2: there is something such that it does subtract haircut. sent3: if the fact that something does not encircle gloom and does encircle buffalo is not false it is not a secondo. sent4: something is not a Honiara if that it is not a secondo and it does encircle gloom is not correct. sent5: the haircut is quantitative. sent6: if the stayer is quantitative then the haircut is not quantitative but it does encircle gloom. sent7: there is something such that it is a secondo. sent8: the stayer is not a Honiara. sent9: the fact that the stayer does not encircle gloom is true if it does not encircle buffalo and it is quantitative. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it subtracts haircut hold then the stayer is not a Honiara. sent11: if the haircut is non-glandular a Meridian it does not encircle buffalo. sent12: the stayer does not encircle gloom and is not a secondo if something is a Honiara. sent13: the stayer is a Sylviidae. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Meridian is not wrong. sent15: if the stayer is a Honiara and is not a kind of a secondo then it does encircle gloom. sent16: if there exists something such that it subtracts haircut the stayer is not a Honiara and it is not a secondo. sent17: if something does not encircle gloom but it is quantitative then the fact that it does not encircle buffalo hold. sent18: the elemi is a winged. sent19: the stayer is a Meridian and it is quantitative if it does not snow tempering. sent20: that something is not a secondo and encircles gloom does not hold if it is quantitative. sent21: if the stayer is not a Honiara and it is not a secondo then the fact that it does encircle gloom is right. sent22: the crossbench is a kind of credible an airship. sent23: the haircut is quantitative if the stayer encircles gloom.
sent2 & sent16 -> int1: the stayer is not a kind of a Honiara and it is not a secondo.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the stayer does encircle gloom.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the haircut does not encircle gloom but it is quantitative.; sent17 -> int4: the haircut does not encircle buffalo if it does not encircle gloom and is quantitative.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the haircut does encircle buffalo.
sent4 -> int5: if the fact that the stayer is not a secondo but it does encircle gloom is incorrect it is not a kind of a Honiara.; sent20 -> int6: that the stayer is not a secondo and does encircle gloom is incorrect if it is quantitative.;
$hypothesis$ = the haircut does not encircle buffalo. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the stayer does encircle gloom the haircut does not encircle gloom and is quantitative is right. sent2: there is something such that it does subtract haircut. sent3: if the fact that something does not encircle gloom and does encircle buffalo is not false it is not a secondo. sent4: something is not a Honiara if that it is not a secondo and it does encircle gloom is not correct. sent5: the haircut is quantitative. sent6: if the stayer is quantitative then the haircut is not quantitative but it does encircle gloom. sent7: there is something such that it is a secondo. sent8: the stayer is not a Honiara. sent9: the fact that the stayer does not encircle gloom is true if it does not encircle buffalo and it is quantitative. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it subtracts haircut hold then the stayer is not a Honiara. sent11: if the haircut is non-glandular a Meridian it does not encircle buffalo. sent12: the stayer does not encircle gloom and is not a secondo if something is a Honiara. sent13: the stayer is a Sylviidae. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Meridian is not wrong. sent15: if the stayer is a Honiara and is not a kind of a secondo then it does encircle gloom. sent16: if there exists something such that it subtracts haircut the stayer is not a Honiara and it is not a secondo. sent17: if something does not encircle gloom but it is quantitative then the fact that it does not encircle buffalo hold. sent18: the elemi is a winged. sent19: the stayer is a Meridian and it is quantitative if it does not snow tempering. sent20: that something is not a secondo and encircles gloom does not hold if it is quantitative. sent21: if the stayer is not a Honiara and it is not a secondo then the fact that it does encircle gloom is right. sent22: the crossbench is a kind of credible an airship. sent23: the haircut is quantitative if the stayer encircles gloom. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent16 -> int1: the stayer is not a kind of a Honiara and it is not a secondo.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the stayer does encircle gloom.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the haircut does not encircle gloom but it is quantitative.; sent17 -> int4: the haircut does not encircle buffalo if it does not encircle gloom and is quantitative.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__