the valsartan does strengthen monochromacy.
sent1: something is not a sequel and it does not widow if it is a copout. sent2: the valsartan strengthens monochromacy if it is a widower. sent3: if something that is not a sequel is not a kind of a widower the fact that it is not a caliph is right. sent4: the butterfish is a kind of a Oslo. sent5: the valsartan does widow if the Nan is a caliph. sent6: the fact that something does not disentangle cachalot and is a Oslo is wrong if it is a kind of a mastoidectomy. sent7: the Oglala is not agential. sent8: the mesh is a copout. sent9: if the Nan does strengthen monochromacy the valsartan is a kind of a Oslo. sent10: everything is toll-free. sent11: the mesh is not a caliph if the valsartan does strengthen monochromacy. sent12: the valsartan widows if the Nan is a sequel. sent13: if the Nan is not a mastoidectomy then it is a caliph or it is a sequel or both. sent14: the mesh is a Oslo if the Nan is toll-free. sent15: the fact that the mesh is not a caliph but it is toll-free is not right if that it does disentangle cachalot hold. sent16: if the mesh is a caliph then it is toll-free. sent17: if the fact that something is a kind of a caliph hold then the fact that it does not strengthen monochromacy and it is a kind of a sequel is not true. sent18: if the mesh does snooker rugged that it is not ameboid and it is a sequel is not correct. sent19: the Nan strengthens monochromacy. sent20: if the mesh is not a caliph the fact that that it is toll-free and a sequel is not incorrect is not right.
sent6 -> int1: that the Nan does not disentangle cachalot but it is a Oslo does not hold if it is a mastoidectomy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Nan is a mastoidectomy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the Nan does not disentangle cachalot and is a Oslo is not right.; sent10 -> int3: the mesh is toll-free.;
the chou is not a kind of a Oslo.
$hypothesis$ = the valsartan does strengthen monochromacy. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a sequel and it does not widow if it is a copout. sent2: the valsartan strengthens monochromacy if it is a widower. sent3: if something that is not a sequel is not a kind of a widower the fact that it is not a caliph is right. sent4: the butterfish is a kind of a Oslo. sent5: the valsartan does widow if the Nan is a caliph. sent6: the fact that something does not disentangle cachalot and is a Oslo is wrong if it is a kind of a mastoidectomy. sent7: the Oglala is not agential. sent8: the mesh is a copout. sent9: if the Nan does strengthen monochromacy the valsartan is a kind of a Oslo. sent10: everything is toll-free. sent11: the mesh is not a caliph if the valsartan does strengthen monochromacy. sent12: the valsartan widows if the Nan is a sequel. sent13: if the Nan is not a mastoidectomy then it is a caliph or it is a sequel or both. sent14: the mesh is a Oslo if the Nan is toll-free. sent15: the fact that the mesh is not a caliph but it is toll-free is not right if that it does disentangle cachalot hold. sent16: if the mesh is a caliph then it is toll-free. sent17: if the fact that something is a kind of a caliph hold then the fact that it does not strengthen monochromacy and it is a kind of a sequel is not true. sent18: if the mesh does snooker rugged that it is not ameboid and it is a sequel is not correct. sent19: the Nan strengthens monochromacy. sent20: if the mesh is not a caliph the fact that that it is toll-free and a sequel is not incorrect is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: that the Nan does not disentangle cachalot but it is a Oslo does not hold if it is a mastoidectomy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Nan is a mastoidectomy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the Nan does not disentangle cachalot and is a Oslo is not right.; sent10 -> int3: the mesh is toll-free.; __UNKNOWN__