if the dwarfing stretcher-bearer does not occur then the impersonation but not the subsiding chinaware happens.
sent1: both the non-rotatoryness and the subsiding incapability happens. sent2: the fact that both the categoricness and the non-nectariferousness happens is not false. sent3: the impersonation happens. sent4: not the vacuolateness but the astronavigation happens. sent5: the cyclopeanness does not occur. sent6: that the depersonalizing but not the imitation happens is triggered by the non-gluttonousness. sent7: that the dwarfing stretcher-bearer does not occur and the subsiding chinaware occurs is not true. sent8: the fact that the dwarfing stretcher-bearer happens and the subsiding chinaware happens does not hold. sent9: the avascularness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dwarfing stretcher-bearer does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the subsiding chinaware occurs.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the dwarfing stretcher-bearer does not occur but the subsiding chinaware happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the subsiding chinaware does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the impersonation occurs but the subsiding chinaware does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the dwarfing stretcher-bearer does not occur then the impersonation but not the subsiding chinaware happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the non-rotatoryness and the subsiding incapability happens. sent2: the fact that both the categoricness and the non-nectariferousness happens is not false. sent3: the impersonation happens. sent4: not the vacuolateness but the astronavigation happens. sent5: the cyclopeanness does not occur. sent6: that the depersonalizing but not the imitation happens is triggered by the non-gluttonousness. sent7: that the dwarfing stretcher-bearer does not occur and the subsiding chinaware occurs is not true. sent8: the fact that the dwarfing stretcher-bearer happens and the subsiding chinaware happens does not hold. sent9: the avascularness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dwarfing stretcher-bearer does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the subsiding chinaware occurs.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the dwarfing stretcher-bearer does not occur but the subsiding chinaware happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the subsiding chinaware does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the impersonation occurs but the subsiding chinaware does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__