the crisscross does depressurize takeaway.
sent1: if the backpack does not credit backpack that it is not a kind of a Muslim and it does not depressurize fiction is false. sent2: that the deserter is actinomorphic hold if the cadmium is a virologist. sent3: if that the uncle is not a five-spot and does credit crystallographer is not correct then the cadmium is a virologist. sent4: that the mezereon is not a virologist and it is not actinomorphic is incorrect if it does depressurize fiction. sent5: that something does not credit backpack is not false if the fact that it is not a kind of a virologist and is not actinomorphic does not hold. sent6: the backpack is not actinomorphic if there exists something such that that it does not credit backpack and it does not depressurize fiction is not true. sent7: that if the deserter is actinomorphic then the backpack does not credit backpack hold. sent8: the crisscross is not a virologist if the fact that it does not credit backpack hold. sent9: that that the uncle is not a five-spot and credits crystallographer is not wrong is wrong. sent10: the crisscross does not depressurize takeaway if there is something such that that it is not a Muslim and it does not depressurize fiction does not hold.
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: that the cadmium is not a kind of a virologist does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the deserter is not non-actinomorphic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the backpack does not credit backpack.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the backpack is not a Muslim and it does not depressurize fiction is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-Muslim thing that does not depressurize fiction does not hold.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the mezereon does not credit backpack.
sent5 -> int6: if that the mezereon is not a virologist and not actinomorphic does not hold then it does not credit backpack.;
$hypothesis$ = the crisscross does depressurize takeaway. ; $context$ = sent1: if the backpack does not credit backpack that it is not a kind of a Muslim and it does not depressurize fiction is false. sent2: that the deserter is actinomorphic hold if the cadmium is a virologist. sent3: if that the uncle is not a five-spot and does credit crystallographer is not correct then the cadmium is a virologist. sent4: that the mezereon is not a virologist and it is not actinomorphic is incorrect if it does depressurize fiction. sent5: that something does not credit backpack is not false if the fact that it is not a kind of a virologist and is not actinomorphic does not hold. sent6: the backpack is not actinomorphic if there exists something such that that it does not credit backpack and it does not depressurize fiction is not true. sent7: that if the deserter is actinomorphic then the backpack does not credit backpack hold. sent8: the crisscross is not a virologist if the fact that it does not credit backpack hold. sent9: that that the uncle is not a five-spot and credits crystallographer is not wrong is wrong. sent10: the crisscross does not depressurize takeaway if there is something such that that it is not a Muslim and it does not depressurize fiction does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: that the cadmium is not a kind of a virologist does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the deserter is not non-actinomorphic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the backpack does not credit backpack.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the backpack is not a Muslim and it does not depressurize fiction is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-Muslim thing that does not depressurize fiction does not hold.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__