the frogbit is not a bastnasite.
sent1: if there is something such that it does desecrate butut the freight is a kind of a Tamarindus and/or does desecrate butut. sent2: something desecrates phyle. sent3: The butut does desecrate bastille. sent4: something is a kind of a bastnasite. sent5: if the escapologist does add then the fact that the frogbit is not a kind of an expedient and/or it is not a whipsaw is incorrect. sent6: the bastille does desecrate butut. sent7: there exists something such that it is an expedient. sent8: if the escapologist is not a whipsaw the frogbit does whipsaw. sent9: something is not a kind of an expedient. sent10: the crampfish is a Tamarindus if the freight is a kind of a Tamarindus. sent11: the escapologist is not a kind of a whipsaw if there exists something such that it is not expedient. sent12: if the freight is a dapple-grey or it does not desecrate butut or both the crampfish does not desecrate phyle. sent13: the crampfish is a Tamarindus if the freight desecrates butut. sent14: if something that does add is a bastnasite the crampfish is not a kind of a Tamarindus. sent15: there are Erasmian things. sent16: if the crampfish adds and is not a Tamarindus then the escapologist does adds. sent17: the bastille is not androgynous if there exists something such that that it is not morbilliform and it is androgynous is incorrect. sent18: everything is not a Tobey and it does articulate. sent19: something is a kind of a bastnasite if the fact that it is not an expedient and/or it is not a whipsaw does not hold. sent20: if that something does not desecrate phyle is not incorrect then it adds and is not a Tamarindus. sent21: the bombardon is not an initiate if the bodywork is not a Tobey but articulate. sent22: if something does not initiate it is a countryside and is a valuable. sent23: something adds. sent24: that the rabbit is not morbilliform and is androgynous is false if the bombardon is a countryside. sent25: if the escapologist is not a whipsaw the frogbit is a kind of a whipsaw that does add. sent26: the frogbit whipsaws.
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the escapologist is not a kind of a whipsaw.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the frogbit is a kind of a whipsaw that does add.; int2 -> int3: the frogbit does add.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frogbit is a kind of a bastnasite.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the frogbit does add and it is a kind of a bastnasite.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it adds and is a bastnasite.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the crampfish is not a Tamarindus.; sent6 -> int7: something does desecrate butut.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the freight is a Tamarindus or it does desecrate butut or both.; int8 & sent10 & sent13 -> int9: the crampfish is a Tamarindus.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the khesari does whipsaw.
$hypothesis$ = the frogbit is not a bastnasite. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does desecrate butut the freight is a kind of a Tamarindus and/or does desecrate butut. sent2: something desecrates phyle. sent3: The butut does desecrate bastille. sent4: something is a kind of a bastnasite. sent5: if the escapologist does add then the fact that the frogbit is not a kind of an expedient and/or it is not a whipsaw is incorrect. sent6: the bastille does desecrate butut. sent7: there exists something such that it is an expedient. sent8: if the escapologist is not a whipsaw the frogbit does whipsaw. sent9: something is not a kind of an expedient. sent10: the crampfish is a Tamarindus if the freight is a kind of a Tamarindus. sent11: the escapologist is not a kind of a whipsaw if there exists something such that it is not expedient. sent12: if the freight is a dapple-grey or it does not desecrate butut or both the crampfish does not desecrate phyle. sent13: the crampfish is a Tamarindus if the freight desecrates butut. sent14: if something that does add is a bastnasite the crampfish is not a kind of a Tamarindus. sent15: there are Erasmian things. sent16: if the crampfish adds and is not a Tamarindus then the escapologist does adds. sent17: the bastille is not androgynous if there exists something such that that it is not morbilliform and it is androgynous is incorrect. sent18: everything is not a Tobey and it does articulate. sent19: something is a kind of a bastnasite if the fact that it is not an expedient and/or it is not a whipsaw does not hold. sent20: if that something does not desecrate phyle is not incorrect then it adds and is not a Tamarindus. sent21: the bombardon is not an initiate if the bodywork is not a Tobey but articulate. sent22: if something does not initiate it is a countryside and is a valuable. sent23: something adds. sent24: that the rabbit is not morbilliform and is androgynous is false if the bombardon is a countryside. sent25: if the escapologist is not a whipsaw the frogbit is a kind of a whipsaw that does add. sent26: the frogbit whipsaws. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the escapologist is not a kind of a whipsaw.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the frogbit is a kind of a whipsaw that does add.; int2 -> int3: the frogbit does add.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the frogbit is a kind of a bastnasite.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the frogbit does add and it is a kind of a bastnasite.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it adds and is a bastnasite.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the crampfish is not a Tamarindus.; sent6 -> int7: something does desecrate butut.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the freight is a Tamarindus or it does desecrate butut or both.; int8 & sent10 & sent13 -> int9: the crampfish is a Tamarindus.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__