the sermon occurs.
sent1: the premiership does not occur. sent2: the chaetognathanness does not occur if the Cornishness but not the view happens. sent3: the shillyshallying snow-in-summer does not occur. sent4: the devoicing densitometry does not occur. sent5: the beaklessness happens. sent6: the fact that the devoicing template does not occur and the landmark does not occur does not hold if the chaetognathanness does not occur. sent7: the Cornish happens. sent8: if the outselling loment does not occur then the fact that either the shillyshallying snow-in-summer happens or the premiership does not occur or both is incorrect. sent9: if not the protrusion but the outselling loment happens the fact that the waterproofing does not occur is correct. sent10: the protrusion does not occur. sent11: the exegeticness occurs. sent12: the enclosure does not occur and the nonrepetitiveness does not occur if the landmark happens. sent13: that the outselling loment occurs and the sermon does not occur is caused by the protrusion. sent14: the triple but not the intermolecularness happens. sent15: if the enclosure does not occur then the duet does not occur and the gliding occurs. sent16: the rampage does not occur. sent17: if the exteriorness occurs but the waterproofing does not occur then the sermon occurs. sent18: the shillyshallying snow-in-summer does not occur if the outselling loment does not occur. sent19: the waterproofing and the exteriorness happens if the duet does not occur. sent20: if that the devoicing template does not occur and the landmark does not occur is false then the landmark occurs. sent21: the exteriorness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the outselling loment does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the shillyshallying snow-in-summer happens or the premiership does not occur or both is false.; sent1 -> int2: the shillyshallying snow-in-summer occurs and/or the premiership does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the outselling loment occurs is true.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: not the protrusion but the outselling loment happens.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the waterproofing does not occur.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the exteriorness happens but the waterproofing does not occur.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the sermon does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the sermon occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the premiership does not occur. sent2: the chaetognathanness does not occur if the Cornishness but not the view happens. sent3: the shillyshallying snow-in-summer does not occur. sent4: the devoicing densitometry does not occur. sent5: the beaklessness happens. sent6: the fact that the devoicing template does not occur and the landmark does not occur does not hold if the chaetognathanness does not occur. sent7: the Cornish happens. sent8: if the outselling loment does not occur then the fact that either the shillyshallying snow-in-summer happens or the premiership does not occur or both is incorrect. sent9: if not the protrusion but the outselling loment happens the fact that the waterproofing does not occur is correct. sent10: the protrusion does not occur. sent11: the exegeticness occurs. sent12: the enclosure does not occur and the nonrepetitiveness does not occur if the landmark happens. sent13: that the outselling loment occurs and the sermon does not occur is caused by the protrusion. sent14: the triple but not the intermolecularness happens. sent15: if the enclosure does not occur then the duet does not occur and the gliding occurs. sent16: the rampage does not occur. sent17: if the exteriorness occurs but the waterproofing does not occur then the sermon occurs. sent18: the shillyshallying snow-in-summer does not occur if the outselling loment does not occur. sent19: the waterproofing and the exteriorness happens if the duet does not occur. sent20: if that the devoicing template does not occur and the landmark does not occur is false then the landmark occurs. sent21: the exteriorness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the outselling loment does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the shillyshallying snow-in-summer happens or the premiership does not occur or both is false.; sent1 -> int2: the shillyshallying snow-in-summer occurs and/or the premiership does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the outselling loment occurs is true.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: not the protrusion but the outselling loment happens.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the waterproofing does not occur.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the exteriorness happens but the waterproofing does not occur.; int7 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__