the defraying Lasso happens.
sent1: the fact that the retroactiveness occurs is not incorrect. sent2: if the clocking begum does not occur both the retroactiveness and the aerialness happens. sent3: the defraying Lasso does not occur if the aerialness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the philosophicness happens is correct. sent5: the retroactiveness results in the watering. sent6: that the philosophicness and the non-aerialness occurs is brought about by that the salving localism does not occur. sent7: the philosophicness occurs if the aerialness occurs. sent8: the non-equatorialness prevents that the dorsiflexion does not occur. sent9: if the about-facing occurs the clocking begum does not occur. sent10: the philosophicness occurs if that the salving localism does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: the fact that the defraying nutation happens is right. sent12: that the watering does not occur is triggered by that the salving localism happens and/or the clocking carrot.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the salving localism happens.; assump1 -> int1: the salving localism and/or the clocking carrot happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the watering does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the watering occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the salving localism does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the philosophicness but not the aerialness happens.; int6 -> int7: the aerial does not occur.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the defraying Lasso happens.
$hypothesis$ = the defraying Lasso happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the retroactiveness occurs is not incorrect. sent2: if the clocking begum does not occur both the retroactiveness and the aerialness happens. sent3: the defraying Lasso does not occur if the aerialness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the philosophicness happens is correct. sent5: the retroactiveness results in the watering. sent6: that the philosophicness and the non-aerialness occurs is brought about by that the salving localism does not occur. sent7: the philosophicness occurs if the aerialness occurs. sent8: the non-equatorialness prevents that the dorsiflexion does not occur. sent9: if the about-facing occurs the clocking begum does not occur. sent10: the philosophicness occurs if that the salving localism does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: the fact that the defraying nutation happens is right. sent12: that the watering does not occur is triggered by that the salving localism happens and/or the clocking carrot. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the salving localism happens.; assump1 -> int1: the salving localism and/or the clocking carrot happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the watering does not occur.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the watering occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the salving localism does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the philosophicness but not the aerialness happens.; int6 -> int7: the aerial does not occur.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__