that the fact that the aneroid is offensive is not false if that the fuller is a heliograph is not incorrect is not right.
sent1: the fuller does not unwrap commodore if it is a kind of a evaporite that is not offensive. sent2: if the fact that something does fracture but it does not dirty is false it is not offensive. sent3: the fuller grazes. sent4: if that something is a heliograph but it is not dirty is not correct it is not a evaporite. sent5: the aneroid is offensive if that the fuller does impersonate lute is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the register is not a evaporite is not false. sent7: the aneroid is offensive and/or it is a heliograph if it is not a kind of a evaporite. sent8: if the fuller does not unwrap commodore then the fact that it fractures or it impersonates lute or both is not false. sent9: if the aneroid unwraps commodore the fuller does impersonate lute. sent10: the aneroid impersonates lute and is not offensive. sent11: if the fuller is both offensive and not a evaporite it does not unwrap commodore. sent12: the fuller is not a kind of a plasmid. sent13: that the commissar is offensive is not incorrect. sent14: the commodore is a fracture. sent15: if the fuller does fracture that the aneroid is offensive hold. sent16: the fuller is not a heliograph if it dirties and it is not a evaporite. sent17: if that something does dirty but it is not a evaporite is not true it does not unwrap commodore. sent18: the aneroid is not an efficiency if it is not inflexible. sent19: the fuller does not impersonate Mya. sent20: the BLT is a Niger but it is not a kind of a heliograph. sent21: the fuller is not offensive. sent22: that the commissar fractures but it does not impersonate lute is wrong if the fact that it is offensive is not false. sent23: if the fuller is a evaporite then the aneroid is a heliograph.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fuller does dirty but it is not a evaporite.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fuller is not a heliograph.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fuller heliographs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fuller does dirty but it is not a evaporite does not hold.; sent17 -> int4: the fuller does not unwrap commodore if the fact that it is both dirty and not a evaporite is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fuller does not unwrap commodore.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fuller does fracture or it does impersonate lute or both.; int6 & sent15 & sent5 -> int7: the aneroid is offensive.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the plumule is not dirty is correct.
sent22 & sent13 -> int8: the fact that the commissar does fracture but it does not impersonate lute is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that that it does fracture and does not impersonate lute is not false is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the aneroid is offensive is not false if that the fuller is a heliograph is not incorrect is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fuller does not unwrap commodore if it is a kind of a evaporite that is not offensive. sent2: if the fact that something does fracture but it does not dirty is false it is not offensive. sent3: the fuller grazes. sent4: if that something is a heliograph but it is not dirty is not correct it is not a evaporite. sent5: the aneroid is offensive if that the fuller does impersonate lute is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the register is not a evaporite is not false. sent7: the aneroid is offensive and/or it is a heliograph if it is not a kind of a evaporite. sent8: if the fuller does not unwrap commodore then the fact that it fractures or it impersonates lute or both is not false. sent9: if the aneroid unwraps commodore the fuller does impersonate lute. sent10: the aneroid impersonates lute and is not offensive. sent11: if the fuller is both offensive and not a evaporite it does not unwrap commodore. sent12: the fuller is not a kind of a plasmid. sent13: that the commissar is offensive is not incorrect. sent14: the commodore is a fracture. sent15: if the fuller does fracture that the aneroid is offensive hold. sent16: the fuller is not a heliograph if it dirties and it is not a evaporite. sent17: if that something does dirty but it is not a evaporite is not true it does not unwrap commodore. sent18: the aneroid is not an efficiency if it is not inflexible. sent19: the fuller does not impersonate Mya. sent20: the BLT is a Niger but it is not a kind of a heliograph. sent21: the fuller is not offensive. sent22: that the commissar fractures but it does not impersonate lute is wrong if the fact that it is offensive is not false. sent23: if the fuller is a evaporite then the aneroid is a heliograph. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fuller does dirty but it is not a evaporite.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the fuller is not a heliograph.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fuller heliographs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fuller does dirty but it is not a evaporite does not hold.; sent17 -> int4: the fuller does not unwrap commodore if the fact that it is both dirty and not a evaporite is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fuller does not unwrap commodore.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fuller does fracture or it does impersonate lute or both.; int6 & sent15 & sent5 -> int7: the aneroid is offensive.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__