that there exists something such that if that it mystifies padlock and does not mystify Chironomus is not true then it is not a kind of a singular is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is brotherly and shrinks is not correct it does not instrument malabsorption. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both choreographic and non-ripe that it is not a Julian is not false. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Thunderer that does not slant then it is not mercuric. sent4: the danish is not a singular if it does not mystify padlock. sent5: if the fact that the entrecote is a kind of a Declomycin and does not mystify padlock is not correct then it instruments Lauder. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it does integrate spoonerism and does not integrate entrecote is false it is Delphic. sent7: there is something such that if that it does instrument Paliurus and it is not a kind of a clawback does not hold that it does not overburden danish is right. sent8: the danish is not violable if the fact that it is a kind of a chauffeur that does not mystify padlock does not hold. sent9: if the danish is grateful but it is not a kind of a polychaete then it does not mystify padlock. sent10: if that the danish does mystify padlock but it does not mystify Chironomus is incorrect then it is not a singular. sent11: that the danish does mystify Chironomus is not correct if the fact that it is inhospitable and it is macrencephalic does not hold. sent12: that something is not acidotic is not false if the fact that it is inoffensive and does not stump is not correct.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is inoffensive and it is not a stumping is not correct then it is not acidotic.
sent12 -> int1: the billionaire is non-acidotic if that it is inoffensive thing that does not stump is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it mystifies padlock and does not mystify Chironomus is not true then it is not a kind of a singular is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is brotherly and shrinks is not correct it does not instrument malabsorption. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both choreographic and non-ripe that it is not a Julian is not false. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Thunderer that does not slant then it is not mercuric. sent4: the danish is not a singular if it does not mystify padlock. sent5: if the fact that the entrecote is a kind of a Declomycin and does not mystify padlock is not correct then it instruments Lauder. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it does integrate spoonerism and does not integrate entrecote is false it is Delphic. sent7: there is something such that if that it does instrument Paliurus and it is not a kind of a clawback does not hold that it does not overburden danish is right. sent8: the danish is not violable if the fact that it is a kind of a chauffeur that does not mystify padlock does not hold. sent9: if the danish is grateful but it is not a kind of a polychaete then it does not mystify padlock. sent10: if that the danish does mystify padlock but it does not mystify Chironomus is incorrect then it is not a singular. sent11: that the danish does mystify Chironomus is not correct if the fact that it is inhospitable and it is macrencephalic does not hold. sent12: that something is not acidotic is not false if the fact that it is inoffensive and does not stump is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__