the tagger is avocational and is mesolithic.
sent1: the fact that the fact that either the saran is not a kind of a hookworm or it is euphoric or both is not incorrect is not correct if it is not mesolithic. sent2: the tagger is not a kind of a hookworm and/or it is avocational. sent3: the fact that the tagger is avocational and it is mesolithic is wrong if the fact that the ripcord is not euphoric is correct. sent4: everything is not a hookworm. sent5: The purism does not carpet ripcord. sent6: the saran carpets purism. sent7: the fact that either something does not carpet purism or it does intrigue Bovidae or both is not true if it is not a level. sent8: the fact that something is not a hookworm and/or it levels is not true if it is non-euphoric. sent9: if the saran is euphoric then the tagger is avocational. sent10: if the ripcord does not carpet purism the tagger is mesolithic but it does not intrigue Bovidae.
sent8 -> int1: if the saran is not euphoric then the fact that either it is not a kind of a hookworm or it levels or both is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the saran is not euphoric is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the saran is not a kind of a hookworm or does level or both does not hold.; sent4 -> int3: the saran is not a kind of a hookworm.; int3 -> int4: the saran is not a kind of a hookworm and/or it levels.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the saran is euphoric.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: that the tagger is avocational is not incorrect.;
that the tagger is avocational and is mesolithic is false.
$hypothesis$ = the tagger is avocational and is mesolithic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that either the saran is not a kind of a hookworm or it is euphoric or both is not incorrect is not correct if it is not mesolithic. sent2: the tagger is not a kind of a hookworm and/or it is avocational. sent3: the fact that the tagger is avocational and it is mesolithic is wrong if the fact that the ripcord is not euphoric is correct. sent4: everything is not a hookworm. sent5: The purism does not carpet ripcord. sent6: the saran carpets purism. sent7: the fact that either something does not carpet purism or it does intrigue Bovidae or both is not true if it is not a level. sent8: the fact that something is not a hookworm and/or it levels is not true if it is non-euphoric. sent9: if the saran is euphoric then the tagger is avocational. sent10: if the ripcord does not carpet purism the tagger is mesolithic but it does not intrigue Bovidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the saran is not euphoric then the fact that either it is not a kind of a hookworm or it levels or both is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the saran is not euphoric is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the saran is not a kind of a hookworm or does level or both does not hold.; sent4 -> int3: the saran is not a kind of a hookworm.; int3 -> int4: the saran is not a kind of a hookworm and/or it levels.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the saran is euphoric.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: that the tagger is avocational is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__