either the appointee is a universalism or it is a homosexual or both.
sent1: something that does not lace and/or does not pleach recommendation does not pleach recommendation. sent2: the windward is a universalism if the fact that the appointee is a kind of a universalism that is not a kind of a commemorative does not hold. sent3: something that renders career is not a lace and/or does not pleach recommendation. sent4: if there is something such that it is not blastocoelic then the appointee is both a universalism and not non-commemorative. sent5: if the officeholder does pulsate the idler does not pulsate. sent6: there is something such that it is not blastocoelic. sent7: if the copyist is blastocoelic then that the appointee is a universalism but it is not a kind of a commemorative is wrong. sent8: the officeholder does pulsate. sent9: the intermediate does render career and does like if the idler does not pulsate.
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the appointee is a universalism that is a commemorative.; int1 -> int2: the appointee is a universalism.; int2 -> hypothesis;
the windward is a universalism.
sent1 -> int3: the intermediate does not pleach recommendation if it is not a kind of a lace and/or it does not pleach recommendation.; sent3 -> int4: if the intermediate does render career it does not lace or does not pleach recommendation or both.; sent5 & sent8 -> int5: that the idler does not pulsate is not wrong.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the intermediate renders career and it does like.; int6 -> int7: the intermediate renders career.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the intermediate is not a lace and/or it does not pleach recommendation.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the intermediate does not pleach recommendation.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it does not pleach recommendation.;
$hypothesis$ = either the appointee is a universalism or it is a homosexual or both. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not lace and/or does not pleach recommendation does not pleach recommendation. sent2: the windward is a universalism if the fact that the appointee is a kind of a universalism that is not a kind of a commemorative does not hold. sent3: something that renders career is not a lace and/or does not pleach recommendation. sent4: if there is something such that it is not blastocoelic then the appointee is both a universalism and not non-commemorative. sent5: if the officeholder does pulsate the idler does not pulsate. sent6: there is something such that it is not blastocoelic. sent7: if the copyist is blastocoelic then that the appointee is a universalism but it is not a kind of a commemorative is wrong. sent8: the officeholder does pulsate. sent9: the intermediate does render career and does like if the idler does not pulsate. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the appointee is a universalism that is a commemorative.; int1 -> int2: the appointee is a universalism.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__