that not the disjunction but the admitting happens is not right.
sent1: the compensating happens. sent2: if the sailing does not occur the spelldown and the steal happens. sent3: the fact that the fact that the removing Merluccius but not the lithotomy happens is not false is not right. sent4: if the irremovableness occurs that the bootlegging does not occur but the spring-cleaning hinny occurs is incorrect. sent5: that the irremovableness does not occur is prevented by the removing utterance. sent6: the supernatural occurs. sent7: the internationalness occurs. sent8: that the admitting happens is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the dancing downiness but not the removing merited occurs is not correct if the cricketing does not occur. sent10: both the non-low-levelness and the choralness happens. sent11: the recouping happens. sent12: the fact that that the disjunction does not occur and the admitting occurs is not false is false if the pelting occurs. sent13: that the spring-cleaning hinny does not occur yields that both the puncturableness and the lunisolarness happens. sent14: if the spelldown happens the fact that the cricket does not occur and the receding does not occur is right. sent15: that the embattling does not occur brings about that the internationalness occurs and the pelting happens. sent16: the perigonalness occurs. sent17: if the fact that not the bootlegging but the spring-cleaning hinny happens is not true the spring-cleaning hinny does not occur. sent18: if the puncturableness happens then that the sailing but not the sojourning occurs is not correct. sent19: the non-bolometricness causes that both the removing namesake and the removing utterance occurs. sent20: the pelting does not occur. sent21: the removing Roccus does not occur. sent22: if that the sailing occurs but the sojourn does not occur is not correct the sailing does not occur. sent23: if that the dancing downiness but not the removing merited occurs is incorrect then the embattling does not occur. sent24: if the internationalness happens then that the disjunction but not the pelting happens is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disjunction happens.; assump1 & sent20 -> int1: the disjunction occurs but the pelting does not occur.; sent24 & sent7 -> int2: that the disjunction but not the pelting occurs is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the disjunction does not occur is not incorrect.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that not the disjunction but the admitting occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = that not the disjunction but the admitting happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the compensating happens. sent2: if the sailing does not occur the spelldown and the steal happens. sent3: the fact that the fact that the removing Merluccius but not the lithotomy happens is not false is not right. sent4: if the irremovableness occurs that the bootlegging does not occur but the spring-cleaning hinny occurs is incorrect. sent5: that the irremovableness does not occur is prevented by the removing utterance. sent6: the supernatural occurs. sent7: the internationalness occurs. sent8: that the admitting happens is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the dancing downiness but not the removing merited occurs is not correct if the cricketing does not occur. sent10: both the non-low-levelness and the choralness happens. sent11: the recouping happens. sent12: the fact that that the disjunction does not occur and the admitting occurs is not false is false if the pelting occurs. sent13: that the spring-cleaning hinny does not occur yields that both the puncturableness and the lunisolarness happens. sent14: if the spelldown happens the fact that the cricket does not occur and the receding does not occur is right. sent15: that the embattling does not occur brings about that the internationalness occurs and the pelting happens. sent16: the perigonalness occurs. sent17: if the fact that not the bootlegging but the spring-cleaning hinny happens is not true the spring-cleaning hinny does not occur. sent18: if the puncturableness happens then that the sailing but not the sojourning occurs is not correct. sent19: the non-bolometricness causes that both the removing namesake and the removing utterance occurs. sent20: the pelting does not occur. sent21: the removing Roccus does not occur. sent22: if that the sailing occurs but the sojourn does not occur is not correct the sailing does not occur. sent23: if that the dancing downiness but not the removing merited occurs is incorrect then the embattling does not occur. sent24: if the internationalness happens then that the disjunction but not the pelting happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the disjunction happens.; assump1 & sent20 -> int1: the disjunction occurs but the pelting does not occur.; sent24 & sent7 -> int2: that the disjunction but not the pelting occurs is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the disjunction does not occur is not incorrect.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__