the spelt is a estoppel but it does not graze.
sent1: the putrefaction is a reciter and it relays. sent2: if the drunk-and-disorderly is a netting and a wart then the possumwood is not a estoppel. sent3: the drunk-and-disorderly does not riot Cinclidae. sent4: if a non-netting thing is not a kind of a wart then it is not a relay. sent5: there is something such that it is a reciter. sent6: the possumwood does riot Cinclidae. sent7: the spelt is not a grazing. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a wart and/or it is not a kind of a netting is correct is false the drunk-and-disorderly does not cluster. sent9: there exists something such that it relays. sent10: something is a estoppel and it is a reciter if it is not a relay. sent11: if the drunk-and-disorderly is not non-hair-shirt the knawel is non-hair-shirt. sent12: if something is a reciter and it does relay then the fact that the knawel does cluster hold. sent13: the putrefaction is a reciter. sent14: the knawel riots Cinclidae. sent15: the drunk-and-disorderly nets if it does not riot Cinclidae. sent16: if the fact that something is not a kind of a reciter but it is a relay does not hold it is a grazing. sent17: if the drunk-and-disorderly does not cluster the fact that the knawel is not a kind of a reciter and is a relay is not true. sent18: that if the spelt is a estoppel the possumwood is a grazing is correct. sent19: the spelt is a estoppel that is not a kind of a grazing if the possumwood is not a estoppel. sent20: the spelt is not a kind of a grazing if the possumwood is not a kind of a estoppel. sent21: The Cinclidae does not riot drunk-and-disorderly.
sent1 -> int1: something is a reciter and it is a relay.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the knawel clusters.; sent15 & sent3 -> int3: that the drunk-and-disorderly does net hold.;
that the spelt is both a estoppel and not a grazing is not correct.
sent16 -> int4: if that the knawel is both not a reciter and a relay is not right it is a kind of a grazing.;
$hypothesis$ = the spelt is a estoppel but it does not graze. ; $context$ = sent1: the putrefaction is a reciter and it relays. sent2: if the drunk-and-disorderly is a netting and a wart then the possumwood is not a estoppel. sent3: the drunk-and-disorderly does not riot Cinclidae. sent4: if a non-netting thing is not a kind of a wart then it is not a relay. sent5: there is something such that it is a reciter. sent6: the possumwood does riot Cinclidae. sent7: the spelt is not a grazing. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a wart and/or it is not a kind of a netting is correct is false the drunk-and-disorderly does not cluster. sent9: there exists something such that it relays. sent10: something is a estoppel and it is a reciter if it is not a relay. sent11: if the drunk-and-disorderly is not non-hair-shirt the knawel is non-hair-shirt. sent12: if something is a reciter and it does relay then the fact that the knawel does cluster hold. sent13: the putrefaction is a reciter. sent14: the knawel riots Cinclidae. sent15: the drunk-and-disorderly nets if it does not riot Cinclidae. sent16: if the fact that something is not a kind of a reciter but it is a relay does not hold it is a grazing. sent17: if the drunk-and-disorderly does not cluster the fact that the knawel is not a kind of a reciter and is a relay is not true. sent18: that if the spelt is a estoppel the possumwood is a grazing is correct. sent19: the spelt is a estoppel that is not a kind of a grazing if the possumwood is not a estoppel. sent20: the spelt is not a kind of a grazing if the possumwood is not a kind of a estoppel. sent21: The Cinclidae does not riot drunk-and-disorderly. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: something is a reciter and it is a relay.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the knawel clusters.; sent15 & sent3 -> int3: that the drunk-and-disorderly does net hold.; __UNKNOWN__