there is something such that if it is not neurobiological the fact that it is a Ascaphidae and it is a kind of a Avalokitesvara is false.
sent1: something is a kind of a repudiation and it does coordinate basketry if it does not consider coastline. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not consider calash then the fact that it does abound and it considers Holarrhena is not correct. sent3: if something does not coordinate Asuncion then that it is thermal and it is concessive hold. sent4: that the paisley is a Ascaphidae and is a Avalokitesvara does not hold if it is neurobiological. sent5: the fact that something is an antibiotic and coordinates capillary does not hold if it is not a tricot. sent6: if the paisley is not neurobiological it is a Ascaphidae and it is a Avalokitesvara. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a Ascaphidae and it is a kind of a Avalokitesvara does not hold if it is not neurobiological. sent8: the fact that something riots and it does steady is wrong if it is not a kind of an awe. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a pitching the fact that it is unawares and it is a kind of a Heinz is not correct. sent10: something is a Ascaphidae and it is a Avalokitesvara if it is not neurobiological. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not persuade the fact that it is a Chartreuse and it does consider keratoconus does not hold.
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the paisley is not neurobiological hold then the fact that it is a Ascaphidae that is a kind of a Avalokitesvara does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a kind of a tricot the fact that it is antibiotic and it coordinates capillary is wrong.
sent5 -> int2: the fact that the club-moss is an antibiotic that does coordinate capillary is not correct if it is not a tricot.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not neurobiological the fact that it is a Ascaphidae and it is a kind of a Avalokitesvara is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a repudiation and it does coordinate basketry if it does not consider coastline. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not consider calash then the fact that it does abound and it considers Holarrhena is not correct. sent3: if something does not coordinate Asuncion then that it is thermal and it is concessive hold. sent4: that the paisley is a Ascaphidae and is a Avalokitesvara does not hold if it is neurobiological. sent5: the fact that something is an antibiotic and coordinates capillary does not hold if it is not a tricot. sent6: if the paisley is not neurobiological it is a Ascaphidae and it is a Avalokitesvara. sent7: the fact that something is a kind of a Ascaphidae and it is a kind of a Avalokitesvara does not hold if it is not neurobiological. sent8: the fact that something riots and it does steady is wrong if it is not a kind of an awe. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a pitching the fact that it is unawares and it is a kind of a Heinz is not correct. sent10: something is a Ascaphidae and it is a Avalokitesvara if it is not neurobiological. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not persuade the fact that it is a Chartreuse and it does consider keratoconus does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the paisley is not neurobiological hold then the fact that it is a Ascaphidae that is a kind of a Avalokitesvara does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__