there is something such that if it does not empty apologist and it is not a kind of a metonym then the fact that it is not a sociable hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a Bucharest and it is a hedgefund it does not empty Cronyn. sent2: if something is not a trichroism and not Appalachian then it is not otic. sent3: if the nakedwood is not a akaryocyte but it is a kind of a ropewalker it does not empty apologist. sent4: there exists something such that if that it does not empty apologist and it is not a metonym hold then it is a sociable. sent5: if the favus does not empty apologist and it is not a kind of a metonym it is not a kind of a sociable. sent6: the patina does not empty apologist if it is noncompetitive thing that is not young.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the tympanum is not a kind of a trichroism and it is not a Appalachian hold the fact that it is not otic hold.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not empty apologist and it is not a kind of a metonym then the fact that it is not a sociable hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a Bucharest and it is a hedgefund it does not empty Cronyn. sent2: if something is not a trichroism and not Appalachian then it is not otic. sent3: if the nakedwood is not a akaryocyte but it is a kind of a ropewalker it does not empty apologist. sent4: there exists something such that if that it does not empty apologist and it is not a metonym hold then it is a sociable. sent5: if the favus does not empty apologist and it is not a kind of a metonym it is not a kind of a sociable. sent6: the patina does not empty apologist if it is noncompetitive thing that is not young. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__