the quaker is a oxime.
sent1: if the ammonite is not a kind of a hematologist then that it is a Sabellian and it does not officialize undercarriage is not correct. sent2: the mouflon is not tetanic if something that officializes undercarriage is not a hematologist. sent3: if something is not a kind of a firebrat then that it is a colors and it does realign rhinestone is not right. sent4: the hotdog officializes undercarriage but it is not a hematologist if the chaise is a Sabellian. sent5: the ammonite is not a kind of a hematologist if that the quaker is both not a Weizenbier and not tetanic hold. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a hematologist and is not a watchfulness is not true. sent7: something that is not a landlubber is not a kind of a watchfulness and does not officialize toll. sent8: the burlap is not a landlubber if there is something such that that it is a kind of colors thing that does realign rhinestone is false. sent9: if that something is not a Weizenbier and it does not amplify is not true it is a kind of a oxime. sent10: the ammonite officializes toll and it is a watchfulness. sent11: if the ammonite is not a hematologist that it is a Sabellian and does officialize undercarriage is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the burlap is not a kind of a Sabellian is not wrong. sent13: the solvent is not a firebrat. sent14: that the hotdog does not officialize toll but it is a Sabellian is incorrect if something is not a Sabellian. sent15: if the burlap is not a watchfulness and it does not officialize toll the chaise is a Sabellian. sent16: something does not officialize toll if it officializes undercarriage. sent17: the quaker is not tetanic. sent18: the hotdog amplifies if the fact that it does not officialize toll and is a Sabellian does not hold. sent19: the chaise is a kind of a hematologist if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a hematologist and it is not a kind of a watchfulness is not right. sent20: the chaise officializes undercarriage. sent21: if that something is a Sabellian and does not officialize undercarriage is not right it does not officialize toll. sent22: if the fact that the hotdog does amplify hold then the mouflon does amplify. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not tetanic then the fact that the ammonite does amplify and is not a Weizenbier is wrong. sent24: if something is a hematologist and it does officialize undercarriage the mouflon is not tetanic. sent25: that the ammonite is a kind of a Sabellian that is not a oxime is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quaker is not a Weizenbier and does not amplify.; assump1 -> int1: the quaker is not a kind of a Weizenbier.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the quaker is not a Weizenbier and is not tetanic.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the ammonite is not a hematologist.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the ammonite is a kind of a Sabellian that does not officialize undercarriage does not hold.; sent21 -> int5: if the fact that the ammonite is a kind of a Sabellian but it does not officialize undercarriage is not correct it does not officialize toll.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ammonite does not officialize toll.; sent10 -> int7: the ammonite does officialize toll.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the quaker is not a Weizenbier and it does not amplify is false.; sent9 -> int10: the quaker is a oxime if that it is not a Weizenbier and does not amplify is not true.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the quaker is not a oxime is not wrong.
sent7 -> int11: the burlap is not a watchfulness and does not officialize toll if it is not a landlubber.; sent3 -> int12: if the solvent is not a kind of a firebrat that it is a kind of a colors and it does realign rhinestone does not hold.; int12 & sent13 -> int13: the fact that the solvent is colors thing that does realign rhinestone is incorrect.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that that it is colors and it realigns rhinestone is not right.; int14 & sent8 -> int15: the burlap is not a kind of a landlubber.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the burlap is not a kind of a watchfulness and it does not officialize toll.; sent15 & int16 -> int17: the chaise is a Sabellian.; sent4 & int17 -> int18: the hotdog officializes undercarriage but it is not a hematologist.; int18 -> int19: something does officialize undercarriage but it is not a kind of a hematologist.; int19 & sent2 -> int20: the mouflon is not tetanic.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that it is non-tetanic.; int21 & sent23 -> int22: that the ammonite does amplify but it is not a Weizenbier is not correct.; int22 -> int23: there is something such that that it amplifies and it is not a Weizenbier does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the quaker is a oxime. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ammonite is not a kind of a hematologist then that it is a Sabellian and it does not officialize undercarriage is not correct. sent2: the mouflon is not tetanic if something that officializes undercarriage is not a hematologist. sent3: if something is not a kind of a firebrat then that it is a colors and it does realign rhinestone is not right. sent4: the hotdog officializes undercarriage but it is not a hematologist if the chaise is a Sabellian. sent5: the ammonite is not a kind of a hematologist if that the quaker is both not a Weizenbier and not tetanic hold. sent6: there is something such that that it is not a hematologist and is not a watchfulness is not true. sent7: something that is not a landlubber is not a kind of a watchfulness and does not officialize toll. sent8: the burlap is not a landlubber if there is something such that that it is a kind of colors thing that does realign rhinestone is false. sent9: if that something is not a Weizenbier and it does not amplify is not true it is a kind of a oxime. sent10: the ammonite officializes toll and it is a watchfulness. sent11: if the ammonite is not a hematologist that it is a Sabellian and does officialize undercarriage is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the burlap is not a kind of a Sabellian is not wrong. sent13: the solvent is not a firebrat. sent14: that the hotdog does not officialize toll but it is a Sabellian is incorrect if something is not a Sabellian. sent15: if the burlap is not a watchfulness and it does not officialize toll the chaise is a Sabellian. sent16: something does not officialize toll if it officializes undercarriage. sent17: the quaker is not tetanic. sent18: the hotdog amplifies if the fact that it does not officialize toll and is a Sabellian does not hold. sent19: the chaise is a kind of a hematologist if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a hematologist and it is not a kind of a watchfulness is not right. sent20: the chaise officializes undercarriage. sent21: if that something is a Sabellian and does not officialize undercarriage is not right it does not officialize toll. sent22: if the fact that the hotdog does amplify hold then the mouflon does amplify. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not tetanic then the fact that the ammonite does amplify and is not a Weizenbier is wrong. sent24: if something is a hematologist and it does officialize undercarriage the mouflon is not tetanic. sent25: that the ammonite is a kind of a Sabellian that is not a oxime is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quaker is not a Weizenbier and does not amplify.; assump1 -> int1: the quaker is not a kind of a Weizenbier.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the quaker is not a Weizenbier and is not tetanic.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the ammonite is not a hematologist.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the ammonite is a kind of a Sabellian that does not officialize undercarriage does not hold.; sent21 -> int5: if the fact that the ammonite is a kind of a Sabellian but it does not officialize undercarriage is not correct it does not officialize toll.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ammonite does not officialize toll.; sent10 -> int7: the ammonite does officialize toll.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the quaker is not a Weizenbier and it does not amplify is false.; sent9 -> int10: the quaker is a oxime if that it is not a Weizenbier and does not amplify is not true.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__