the fact that the stairwell cultures consummation and it is retroactive does not hold.
sent1: that the VCR does not parch is not false. sent2: the spironolactone is a vent. sent3: the VCR is a kind of a Bankhead. sent4: if something that is not a Bankhead is a kind of a vent the stairwell is retroactive. sent5: the spironolactone is a nasturtium. sent6: the stairwell is circulative if that the stable is a kidney hold. sent7: that the stairwell does culture consummation is correct if it is circulative. sent8: the fact that if the VCR does not parch then the fact that the stable is a nasturtium is correct is not wrong. sent9: the stairwell is not mucopurulent but it parches. sent10: there exists something such that that it is a syndrome is not true. sent11: the fact that something cultures consummation but it is not a Bankhead is not true if it is retroactive. sent12: something is retroactive. sent13: there exists something such that it is a syndrome. sent14: the metalwork is a kind of a Bankhead. sent15: that the stable is a kind of non-retroactive thing that is not a kind of a vent is not right. sent16: the spironolactone is a syndrome. sent17: the tilter does not culture consummation if there exists something such that the fact that it does culture consummation and it is not a Bankhead is wrong. sent18: if something does not parch the fact that it does culture consummation and is retroactive does not hold. sent19: if the VCR does not parch then the stable is a kind of a nasturtium and is a kidney. sent20: there exists something such that it does vent. sent21: if the stairwell is a kidney then that the stable is circulative is not false. sent22: the stable is non-lobar a Pauling. sent23: the stable is a Bankhead and it is a kind of a vent if something is a syndrome. sent24: the stairwell does not culture stable. sent25: the stable is a kind of a syndrome. sent26: the VCR is retroactive if there exists something such that the fact that it is not retroactive and does not vent is incorrect. sent27: the spironolactone is not a Bankhead if there is something such that it is not a kind of a syndrome.
sent19 & sent1 -> int1: the stable is a kind of a nasturtium and it is a kidney.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the stable is a kidney is right.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the stairwell is circulative.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the stairwell does culture consummation.; sent10 & sent27 -> int5: the spironolactone is not a Bankhead.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the spironolactone is not a kind of a Bankhead and is a kind of a vent.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a Bankhead and it does vent.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the stairwell is retroactive.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the stairwell cultures consummation and is retroactive is not wrong is false.
sent18 -> int9: the fact that the stairwell cultures consummation and is retroactive is not correct if it does not parch.; sent13 & sent23 -> int10: the stable is a Bankhead and it vents.; int10 -> int11: the stable is a Bankhead.; int11 -> int12: something is a Bankhead.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stairwell cultures consummation and it is retroactive does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the VCR does not parch is not false. sent2: the spironolactone is a vent. sent3: the VCR is a kind of a Bankhead. sent4: if something that is not a Bankhead is a kind of a vent the stairwell is retroactive. sent5: the spironolactone is a nasturtium. sent6: the stairwell is circulative if that the stable is a kidney hold. sent7: that the stairwell does culture consummation is correct if it is circulative. sent8: the fact that if the VCR does not parch then the fact that the stable is a nasturtium is correct is not wrong. sent9: the stairwell is not mucopurulent but it parches. sent10: there exists something such that that it is a syndrome is not true. sent11: the fact that something cultures consummation but it is not a Bankhead is not true if it is retroactive. sent12: something is retroactive. sent13: there exists something such that it is a syndrome. sent14: the metalwork is a kind of a Bankhead. sent15: that the stable is a kind of non-retroactive thing that is not a kind of a vent is not right. sent16: the spironolactone is a syndrome. sent17: the tilter does not culture consummation if there exists something such that the fact that it does culture consummation and it is not a Bankhead is wrong. sent18: if something does not parch the fact that it does culture consummation and is retroactive does not hold. sent19: if the VCR does not parch then the stable is a kind of a nasturtium and is a kidney. sent20: there exists something such that it does vent. sent21: if the stairwell is a kidney then that the stable is circulative is not false. sent22: the stable is non-lobar a Pauling. sent23: the stable is a Bankhead and it is a kind of a vent if something is a syndrome. sent24: the stairwell does not culture stable. sent25: the stable is a kind of a syndrome. sent26: the VCR is retroactive if there exists something such that the fact that it is not retroactive and does not vent is incorrect. sent27: the spironolactone is not a Bankhead if there is something such that it is not a kind of a syndrome. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent1 -> int1: the stable is a kind of a nasturtium and it is a kidney.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the stable is a kidney is right.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the stairwell is circulative.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the stairwell does culture consummation.; sent10 & sent27 -> int5: the spironolactone is not a Bankhead.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the spironolactone is not a kind of a Bankhead and is a kind of a vent.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a Bankhead and it does vent.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the stairwell is retroactive.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__