the fact that the crossbar is inextricable and is a kind of a carpetbagger is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that it dominates maximization. sent2: something is a carpetbagger if the fact that it humanizes Hepworth is true. sent3: if the fact that the cement is not a tastebud and does not humanize Pashto is incorrect then that the crossbar is a kind of a haying is not wrong. sent4: if the fact that the fish-fly is a carpetbagger but it is not a Flemish does not hold the crossbar is a carpetbagger. sent5: something is inextricable if it is a kind of a haying. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not serous then the fact that the fish-fly is a kind of a carpetbagger but it is not a Flemish does not hold. sent7: that the cement is not a tastebud and does not humanize Pashto is wrong if the musculature is a kind of a tastebud. sent8: the fish-fly is a carpetbagger if it humanizes Pashto. sent9: the fact that the cement is appositional and it does hay is not correct. sent10: the inmate is not tracked and/or it is non-eremitic. sent11: if the fact that the inmate is trackless and/or it is not eremitic is not false the longroot does humanize Hepworth. sent12: the cement is serous if the robe-de-chambre is a Flemish and/or is not a tastebud. sent13: the musculature is a tastebud if the longroot humanizes Hepworth. sent14: the robe-de-chambre is not serous if something does dominate maximization.
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the longroot does humanize Hepworth.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the musculature is a tastebud.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the cement is not a kind of a tastebud and does not humanize Pashto is incorrect.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the crossbar hays.; sent5 -> int5: if the crossbar is a haying then it is inextricable.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the crossbar is inextricable.; sent1 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that the robe-de-chambre is not serous is not incorrect.; int7 -> int8: something is non-serous.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the fact that the fish-fly is a carpetbagger but it is not a Flemish is wrong.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the crossbar is a carpetbagger.; int6 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the crossbar is inextricable and is a kind of a carpetbagger is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it dominates maximization. sent2: something is a carpetbagger if the fact that it humanizes Hepworth is true. sent3: if the fact that the cement is not a tastebud and does not humanize Pashto is incorrect then that the crossbar is a kind of a haying is not wrong. sent4: if the fact that the fish-fly is a carpetbagger but it is not a Flemish does not hold the crossbar is a carpetbagger. sent5: something is inextricable if it is a kind of a haying. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not serous then the fact that the fish-fly is a kind of a carpetbagger but it is not a Flemish does not hold. sent7: that the cement is not a tastebud and does not humanize Pashto is wrong if the musculature is a kind of a tastebud. sent8: the fish-fly is a carpetbagger if it humanizes Pashto. sent9: the fact that the cement is appositional and it does hay is not correct. sent10: the inmate is not tracked and/or it is non-eremitic. sent11: if the fact that the inmate is trackless and/or it is not eremitic is not false the longroot does humanize Hepworth. sent12: the cement is serous if the robe-de-chambre is a Flemish and/or is not a tastebud. sent13: the musculature is a tastebud if the longroot humanizes Hepworth. sent14: the robe-de-chambre is not serous if something does dominate maximization. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the longroot does humanize Hepworth.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the musculature is a tastebud.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the cement is not a kind of a tastebud and does not humanize Pashto is incorrect.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the crossbar hays.; sent5 -> int5: if the crossbar is a haying then it is inextricable.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the crossbar is inextricable.; sent1 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that the robe-de-chambre is not serous is not incorrect.; int7 -> int8: something is non-serous.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the fact that the fish-fly is a carpetbagger but it is not a Flemish is wrong.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the crossbar is a carpetbagger.; int6 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__