the lancelet does not disrespect nogging but it is a kind of a chine.
sent1: if that the Westernization does connive but it does not lap adjuster is not right then it does not connive. sent2: the lancelet does not disrespect nogging. sent3: if the yacht does connive then it is factory-made. sent4: if that the apiary is not a kind of a liberality but it is a kind of a sandlot is incorrect then the yacht connives. sent5: that the yacht is not factory-made is not wrong. sent6: that the apiary is not a liberality but a sandlot is wrong if the lancelet is not a liberality. sent7: that the apiary is a liberality that is a kind of a sandlot is incorrect. sent8: the fact that something connives but it does not lap adjuster is not right if the fact that it is factory-made hold. sent9: something is not a liberality if it does not disrespect nogging and is a kind of a chine. sent10: something is not a kind of a liberality if it does disrespect nogging and does chine. sent11: the lancelet is not a liberality if it disrespects nogging and it chines.
sent9 -> int1: the lancelet is not a liberality if it does not disrespect nogging and it is a kind of a chine.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lancelet does not disrespect nogging and does chine.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lancelet is not a liberality.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the apiary is not a liberality and is a sandlot is incorrect.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the yacht does connive is true.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the yacht is not non-factory-made.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the lancelet does not disrespect nogging and is a chine.
sent8 -> int7: if the mate is not non-factory-made the fact that it does connive and does not lap adjuster is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the lancelet does not disrespect nogging but it is a kind of a chine. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Westernization does connive but it does not lap adjuster is not right then it does not connive. sent2: the lancelet does not disrespect nogging. sent3: if the yacht does connive then it is factory-made. sent4: if that the apiary is not a kind of a liberality but it is a kind of a sandlot is incorrect then the yacht connives. sent5: that the yacht is not factory-made is not wrong. sent6: that the apiary is not a liberality but a sandlot is wrong if the lancelet is not a liberality. sent7: that the apiary is a liberality that is a kind of a sandlot is incorrect. sent8: the fact that something connives but it does not lap adjuster is not right if the fact that it is factory-made hold. sent9: something is not a liberality if it does not disrespect nogging and is a kind of a chine. sent10: something is not a kind of a liberality if it does disrespect nogging and does chine. sent11: the lancelet is not a liberality if it disrespects nogging and it chines. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the lancelet is not a liberality if it does not disrespect nogging and it is a kind of a chine.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lancelet does not disrespect nogging and does chine.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lancelet is not a liberality.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the apiary is not a liberality and is a sandlot is incorrect.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the yacht does connive is true.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the yacht is not non-factory-made.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__