there is something such that if it is not a flex that it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and does not demilitarize is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a flex then that that it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and it does not demilitarize hold does not hold. sent2: if the peanut is not a bundle then the fact that it does bilk hypophysectomy and is not arsenious does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the peanut is not a flex is not wrong then it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and it does not demilitarize. sent4: there is something such that if it does not flex it bilks pseudohermaphrodite and it does not demilitarize. sent5: if the peanut does not flex then that that it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and does demilitarize is not false is not right. sent6: the fact that the cobra roughens Bloch and skids beryl is false if it does not demilitarize. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a flex is not wrong then the fact that it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and it does demilitarize is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a paratrooper then that it is centered thing that does not skid Castoridae is not correct. sent9: the fact that the peanut bilks pseudohermaphrodite but it does not demilitarize is wrong if it flexes. sent10: that something demilitarizes and is not a kind of a Binghamton is incorrect if it is not a kind of a systematization. sent11: that something is catachrestic and does not skid wish does not hold if the fact that it is not eutrophic is not wrong. sent12: if the peanut does not flex then the fact that it bilks pseudohermaphrodite and does not demilitarize is not right.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
if that the limousine is not a systematization hold then that it demilitarizes and it is not a Binghamton is not right.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a flex that it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and does not demilitarize is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a flex then that that it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and it does not demilitarize hold does not hold. sent2: if the peanut is not a bundle then the fact that it does bilk hypophysectomy and is not arsenious does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the peanut is not a flex is not wrong then it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and it does not demilitarize. sent4: there is something such that if it does not flex it bilks pseudohermaphrodite and it does not demilitarize. sent5: if the peanut does not flex then that that it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and does demilitarize is not false is not right. sent6: the fact that the cobra roughens Bloch and skids beryl is false if it does not demilitarize. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a flex is not wrong then the fact that it does bilk pseudohermaphrodite and it does demilitarize is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a paratrooper then that it is centered thing that does not skid Castoridae is not correct. sent9: the fact that the peanut bilks pseudohermaphrodite but it does not demilitarize is wrong if it flexes. sent10: that something demilitarizes and is not a kind of a Binghamton is incorrect if it is not a kind of a systematization. sent11: that something is catachrestic and does not skid wish does not hold if the fact that it is not eutrophic is not wrong. sent12: if the peanut does not flex then the fact that it bilks pseudohermaphrodite and does not demilitarize is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__