the AFP is not a toehold and trashes.
sent1: if the periscope does not counterweight ethnocentrism then the fact that the AFP is a toehold and it is a pet is not correct. sent2: if the periscope does not pet the fact that the AFP is a toehold and trashes does not hold. sent3: the periscope is a dissolving. sent4: the periscope counterweights ethnocentrism if the dunlin is a kind of a defile. sent5: that if the periscope is the trash then the periscope does not pet is correct. sent6: that the AFP is a toehold and it trashes is not right. sent7: something that does defile does not counterweight ethnocentrism. sent8: the fact that the dunlin is a kind of a raffle is not false. sent9: if something does counterweight ethnocentrism it is not a pet. sent10: the fact that the dunlin is a defile hold. sent11: the fact that the AFP is not a toehold but it is a kind of a trash is wrong if the periscope is not a pet. sent12: if the dunlin is a defile then it does not trash. sent13: if something is a pet it does not defile. sent14: the fact that the AFP does not trash but it does counterweight ethnocentrism is not true. sent15: if the dunlin is not a toehold then the fact that the periscope does not defile but it does counterweight ethnocentrism is wrong.
sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the periscope counterweights ethnocentrism.; sent9 -> int2: the periscope does not pet if the fact that it counterweights ethnocentrism is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the periscope is not a kind of a pet.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the AFP is not a toehold and trashes. ; $context$ = sent1: if the periscope does not counterweight ethnocentrism then the fact that the AFP is a toehold and it is a pet is not correct. sent2: if the periscope does not pet the fact that the AFP is a toehold and trashes does not hold. sent3: the periscope is a dissolving. sent4: the periscope counterweights ethnocentrism if the dunlin is a kind of a defile. sent5: that if the periscope is the trash then the periscope does not pet is correct. sent6: that the AFP is a toehold and it trashes is not right. sent7: something that does defile does not counterweight ethnocentrism. sent8: the fact that the dunlin is a kind of a raffle is not false. sent9: if something does counterweight ethnocentrism it is not a pet. sent10: the fact that the dunlin is a defile hold. sent11: the fact that the AFP is not a toehold but it is a kind of a trash is wrong if the periscope is not a pet. sent12: if the dunlin is a defile then it does not trash. sent13: if something is a pet it does not defile. sent14: the fact that the AFP does not trash but it does counterweight ethnocentrism is not true. sent15: if the dunlin is not a toehold then the fact that the periscope does not defile but it does counterweight ethnocentrism is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the periscope counterweights ethnocentrism.; sent9 -> int2: the periscope does not pet if the fact that it counterweights ethnocentrism is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the periscope is not a kind of a pet.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__