the dinky does not fancy.
sent1: something does fancy if it enlivens Dasypodidae. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it does reassail amnesty and is not a diamondback is false. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does reassail amnesty and it is not a diamondback is false the wheedler is a diamondback. sent4: the dope is a kind of a Panicum if the wheedler does not enliven salinometer. sent5: the dope is a Panicum if the wheedler is a Panicum. sent6: that the reseau is a last and it furrows chill is wrong if that the dinky does not enliven Dasypodidae is correct. sent7: if something is a kind of a Panicum it enlivens Dasypodidae. sent8: the dinky is not a fancy if the reseau enlivens Dasypodidae. sent9: the dope is not a Panicum if there exists something such that that it is a last and it does furrow chill is incorrect. sent10: if something is a diamondback that it is a Panicum or does not enliven salinometer or both is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dinky does not enliven Dasypodidae.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the reseau is a last that furrows chill is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a kind of last thing that furrows chill is not correct.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the dope is not a kind of a Panicum.; sent10 -> int4: the wheedler is a kind of a Panicum or it does not enliven salinometer or both if it is a kind of a diamondback.; sent2 & sent3 -> int5: the wheedler is a diamondback.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the wheedler is a Panicum and/or it does not enliven salinometer.; int6 & sent5 & sent4 -> int7: the dope is a Panicum.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the dinky does enliven Dasypodidae.; sent1 -> int10: the dinky fancies if it enlivens Dasypodidae.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the dinky does not fancy.
sent7 -> int11: if the reseau is a kind of a Panicum then it enlivens Dasypodidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the dinky does not fancy. ; $context$ = sent1: something does fancy if it enlivens Dasypodidae. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it does reassail amnesty and is not a diamondback is false. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it does reassail amnesty and it is not a diamondback is false the wheedler is a diamondback. sent4: the dope is a kind of a Panicum if the wheedler does not enliven salinometer. sent5: the dope is a Panicum if the wheedler is a Panicum. sent6: that the reseau is a last and it furrows chill is wrong if that the dinky does not enliven Dasypodidae is correct. sent7: if something is a kind of a Panicum it enlivens Dasypodidae. sent8: the dinky is not a fancy if the reseau enlivens Dasypodidae. sent9: the dope is not a Panicum if there exists something such that that it is a last and it does furrow chill is incorrect. sent10: if something is a diamondback that it is a Panicum or does not enliven salinometer or both is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dinky does not enliven Dasypodidae.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the reseau is a last that furrows chill is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a kind of last thing that furrows chill is not correct.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the dope is not a kind of a Panicum.; sent10 -> int4: the wheedler is a kind of a Panicum or it does not enliven salinometer or both if it is a kind of a diamondback.; sent2 & sent3 -> int5: the wheedler is a diamondback.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the wheedler is a Panicum and/or it does not enliven salinometer.; int6 & sent5 & sent4 -> int7: the dope is a Panicum.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the dinky does enliven Dasypodidae.; sent1 -> int10: the dinky fancies if it enlivens Dasypodidae.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__