that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a boatload then the fact that it is both not a controlled and not a reagent is false is not true.
sent1: the fact that the solvate is not nonprehensile and it is not a reagent does not hold if that it is not constitutional is correct. sent2: that the solvate is not a kind of an inevitable and it does not teethe is incorrect if it is not a boatload. sent3: the fact that the solvate does not control and it is not a kind of a reagent is not correct if it is not a boatload. sent4: the fact that the solvate is not electrostatics and it is not a Humvee does not hold if it is not a reagent. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a boatload is not incorrect then it is both not a controlled and not a reagent. sent6: the fact that something is not inconsistent and it does not palatalize Xenopus is false if it is not a kind of a oxygenase. sent7: if the solvate is not a boatload then it is both not a controlled and not a reagent. sent8: that the solvate is not a controlled and is a reagent is not right if it is not a kind of a boatload. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a solfege the fact that it is not electrostatics and it does not flush is not right. sent10: that that the solvate is not a two-timer and it is not a perdurability is not false is not true if it does not control. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a boatload then that it is not a kind of a controlled and it is a reagent is false. sent12: there exists something such that if that the fact that it is not a boatload is true is false the fact that it is not a controlled and is not a reagent is incorrect. sent13: there exists something such that if it is non-appetitive then that it does not lecture reflectiveness and it is not hot is not right. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a boatload that it is a kind of a controlled and it is not a kind of a reagent is not correct. sent15: if the solvate is a boatload the fact that it is not a controlled and is not a kind of a reagent does not hold. sent16: the fact that the solvate controls but it is not a reagent is false if the fact that it is not a boatload is not wrong. sent17: that something is not a boatload and it does not behave is wrong if that it is not ceremonious is not wrong. sent18: the fact that if something is not a kind of a weatherglass then that it is not a roll and it is not a controlled is not right is correct. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a beefsteak then the fact that it is not a canola and is not a kind of a cowherb is wrong.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the solvate is not ceremonious hold that it is not a boatload and does not behave is wrong.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a boatload then the fact that it is both not a controlled and not a reagent is false is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the solvate is not nonprehensile and it is not a reagent does not hold if that it is not constitutional is correct. sent2: that the solvate is not a kind of an inevitable and it does not teethe is incorrect if it is not a boatload. sent3: the fact that the solvate does not control and it is not a kind of a reagent is not correct if it is not a boatload. sent4: the fact that the solvate is not electrostatics and it is not a Humvee does not hold if it is not a reagent. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a boatload is not incorrect then it is both not a controlled and not a reagent. sent6: the fact that something is not inconsistent and it does not palatalize Xenopus is false if it is not a kind of a oxygenase. sent7: if the solvate is not a boatload then it is both not a controlled and not a reagent. sent8: that the solvate is not a controlled and is a reagent is not right if it is not a kind of a boatload. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a solfege the fact that it is not electrostatics and it does not flush is not right. sent10: that that the solvate is not a two-timer and it is not a perdurability is not false is not true if it does not control. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a boatload then that it is not a kind of a controlled and it is a reagent is false. sent12: there exists something such that if that the fact that it is not a boatload is true is false the fact that it is not a controlled and is not a reagent is incorrect. sent13: there exists something such that if it is non-appetitive then that it does not lecture reflectiveness and it is not hot is not right. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a boatload that it is a kind of a controlled and it is not a kind of a reagent is not correct. sent15: if the solvate is a boatload the fact that it is not a controlled and is not a kind of a reagent does not hold. sent16: the fact that the solvate controls but it is not a reagent is false if the fact that it is not a boatload is not wrong. sent17: that something is not a boatload and it does not behave is wrong if that it is not ceremonious is not wrong. sent18: the fact that if something is not a kind of a weatherglass then that it is not a roll and it is not a controlled is not right is correct. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a beefsteak then the fact that it is not a canola and is not a kind of a cowherb is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__