the reexamination does not occur but the seiche occurs.
sent1: the compensating myogram does not occur. sent2: that the zoning does not occur triggers that the tweet and the mandibulateness happens. sent3: the fact that the reexamination does not occur but the seiche happens is false if the mandibulateness does not occur. sent4: the cholecystectomy happens if not the nonviolentness but the seiche happens. sent5: the non-incalculableness yields that the crucifixion does not occur and the compensating myogram happens. sent6: that the nonviolentness happens hold. sent7: the nonviolentness occurs if the compensating myogram does not occur. sent8: the mandibulateness happens. sent9: the compensating withdrawal happens. sent10: if the compensating myogram does not occur then the seiche and the nonviolentness happens. sent11: that the reexamination does not occur is caused by that the mandibulateness occurs and the zoning occurs.
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the seiche happens and the nonviolentness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the seiche happens.;
the fact that the reexamination does not occur but the seiche happens is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the reexamination does not occur but the seiche occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the compensating myogram does not occur. sent2: that the zoning does not occur triggers that the tweet and the mandibulateness happens. sent3: the fact that the reexamination does not occur but the seiche happens is false if the mandibulateness does not occur. sent4: the cholecystectomy happens if not the nonviolentness but the seiche happens. sent5: the non-incalculableness yields that the crucifixion does not occur and the compensating myogram happens. sent6: that the nonviolentness happens hold. sent7: the nonviolentness occurs if the compensating myogram does not occur. sent8: the mandibulateness happens. sent9: the compensating withdrawal happens. sent10: if the compensating myogram does not occur then the seiche and the nonviolentness happens. sent11: that the reexamination does not occur is caused by that the mandibulateness occurs and the zoning occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the seiche happens and the nonviolentness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the seiche happens.; __UNKNOWN__