that the seaside is a kind of a bend hold.
sent1: if the toadstool is not a bend the Guarani is an ostracism. sent2: that that something does not wrap Bond but it is destructible is not correct if it is not a kind of a Rachmaninoff is true. sent3: that the seaside bends but it is not an ostracism is false if there exists something such that it is not a smelt. sent4: if there is something such that that it does not sneak hold that the linnet is an ostracism but not a smelt is wrong. sent5: something is not a sneak. sent6: the fact that the seaside is not a kind of a bend is right if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of an ostracism and is not a smelt is not right. sent7: everything is Gandhian or not a Rachmaninoff or both. sent8: the fact that something is an ostracism but it is not a smelt is correct. sent9: there is something such that that it is unscientific and it is a Mandelstam does not hold. sent10: something that either is Gandhian or is not a Rachmaninoff or both is not a Rachmaninoff. sent11: the fact that the seaside is surface thing that is not a Toltec is not true if something is a kind of a sneak. sent12: if there is something such that it is both a smelt and an ostracism the linnet is a sneak.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the linnet is an ostracism but it is not a smelt is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is an ostracism and is not a smelt does not hold.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the seaside is a surface and not a Toltec is not right.
sent2 -> int3: the fact that the perihelion does not wrap Bond and is destructible is incorrect if it is not a Rachmaninoff.; sent10 -> int4: the system is not a kind of a Rachmaninoff if it is Gandhian and/or it is not a Rachmaninoff.; sent7 -> int5: the fact that the system is Gandhian and/or it is not a Rachmaninoff is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the system is not a kind of a Rachmaninoff.; int6 -> int7: everything is not a Rachmaninoff.; int7 -> int8: the perihelion is not a kind of a Rachmaninoff.; int3 & int8 -> int9: that the perihelion does not wrap Bond and is destructible does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists nothing such that it does not wrap Bond and it is not indestructible.; int10 -> int11: that that the toadstool does not wrap Bond but it is destructible is false is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the seaside is a kind of a bend hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the toadstool is not a bend the Guarani is an ostracism. sent2: that that something does not wrap Bond but it is destructible is not correct if it is not a kind of a Rachmaninoff is true. sent3: that the seaside bends but it is not an ostracism is false if there exists something such that it is not a smelt. sent4: if there is something such that that it does not sneak hold that the linnet is an ostracism but not a smelt is wrong. sent5: something is not a sneak. sent6: the fact that the seaside is not a kind of a bend is right if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of an ostracism and is not a smelt is not right. sent7: everything is Gandhian or not a Rachmaninoff or both. sent8: the fact that something is an ostracism but it is not a smelt is correct. sent9: there is something such that that it is unscientific and it is a Mandelstam does not hold. sent10: something that either is Gandhian or is not a Rachmaninoff or both is not a Rachmaninoff. sent11: the fact that the seaside is surface thing that is not a Toltec is not true if something is a kind of a sneak. sent12: if there is something such that it is both a smelt and an ostracism the linnet is a sneak. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the linnet is an ostracism but it is not a smelt is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is an ostracism and is not a smelt does not hold.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__