there is something such that if it is a Lepidothamnus that it is a kind of pituitary thing that is not entomophilous is not false.
sent1: if the garganey is a Lepidothamnus it is a kind of a pituitary. sent2: the garganey is lactic if it is iridic. sent3: there is something such that if it is bare it is not black-and-white. sent4: the fact that something humbugs but it is not a thumbprint is not incorrect if that it is black-and-white hold. sent5: if the garganey is lactic then it is pyrogallic and not a pituitary. sent6: there is something such that if it is pneumatics then it is both a latitudinarian and not abasic. sent7: if the garganey is a kind of a RICO then it is icosahedral and it is not entomophilous. sent8: if the garganey is a Lepidothamnus then it is a kind of pituitary thing that is not entomophilous. sent9: if something is entomophilous it is a Jacobin and it is not a Braunschweig. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Lepidothamnus it is not entomophilous. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is a Lepidothamnus is true it is a pituitary that is entomophilous. sent12: that there is something such that if it is a kind of a crankcase it is black-and-white and it does not company quilted is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Lepidothamnus then it is a kind of a pituitary. sent14: the garganey is a Lepidothamnus that is not a smear if it does thumbtack. sent15: the garganey is a kind of a pituitary and it is entomophilous if it is a Lepidothamnus. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Braunschweig it is not non-steadied and is not masculine. sent17: the garganey is a pituitary but it is not irrational if it is a sonnet.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the pinite is a humbug but it is not a kind of a thumbprint if that it is black-and-white is correct.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a Lepidothamnus that it is a kind of pituitary thing that is not entomophilous is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the garganey is a Lepidothamnus it is a kind of a pituitary. sent2: the garganey is lactic if it is iridic. sent3: there is something such that if it is bare it is not black-and-white. sent4: the fact that something humbugs but it is not a thumbprint is not incorrect if that it is black-and-white hold. sent5: if the garganey is lactic then it is pyrogallic and not a pituitary. sent6: there is something such that if it is pneumatics then it is both a latitudinarian and not abasic. sent7: if the garganey is a kind of a RICO then it is icosahedral and it is not entomophilous. sent8: if the garganey is a Lepidothamnus then it is a kind of pituitary thing that is not entomophilous. sent9: if something is entomophilous it is a Jacobin and it is not a Braunschweig. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Lepidothamnus it is not entomophilous. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is a Lepidothamnus is true it is a pituitary that is entomophilous. sent12: that there is something such that if it is a kind of a crankcase it is black-and-white and it does not company quilted is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Lepidothamnus then it is a kind of a pituitary. sent14: the garganey is a Lepidothamnus that is not a smear if it does thumbtack. sent15: the garganey is a kind of a pituitary and it is entomophilous if it is a Lepidothamnus. sent16: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Braunschweig it is not non-steadied and is not masculine. sent17: the garganey is a pituitary but it is not irrational if it is a sonnet. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__