the canistel is not cytological.
sent1: something is not a criollo if it is cytological but not biologistic. sent2: if something that is perceptible is not a kind of a criollo it is not biologistic. sent3: that something does not piddle achievability and/or is a dowager is not right if it is hydrophobic. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not piddle pinion and is biologistic then the destalinization is not a kind of a criollo. sent5: the canistel is perceptible but it is not a criollo if something is cytological. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it does not piddle achievability or it is a kind of a dowager or both is not right then the pedal is a kind of a cryptograph. sent7: the blackberry-lily is not unenforceable but it is not viceregal. sent8: everything is hydrophobic. sent9: there exists something such that that it does piddle Presbyterianism hold. sent10: the blackberry-lily is a kind of cytological thing that is not a kind of a criollo. sent11: the hypoglossal is not a criollo. sent12: the canistel does not piddle heteroploidy. sent13: something that is a kind of biologistic a criollo is non-cytological. sent14: the fact that there is something such that the fact that it does piddle heteroploidy hold is correct. sent15: the blackberry-lily outstares refectory but it is not a kind of a garden. sent16: if something that is a kind of a criollo is cytological then it is not biologistic. sent17: if something is cytological but it is not perceptible it is not a kind of a criollo. sent18: the canistel is not a kind of a criollo. sent19: if the blackberry-lily piddles heteroploidy then the canistel is cytological. sent20: if there is something such that it does piddle heteroploidy then the fact that the blackberry-lily is both perceptible and not a criollo hold.
sent14 & sent20 -> int1: the blackberry-lily is perceptible thing that is not a kind of a criollo.; sent2 -> int2: the blackberry-lily is not biologistic if that it is perceptible and it is not a criollo hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blackberry-lily is not biologistic.;
the canistel is cytological.
sent3 -> int4: if the transmission is hydrophobic the fact that it does not piddle achievability and/or it is a dowager is not correct.; sent8 -> int5: the transmission is hydrophobic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the transmission does not piddle achievability and/or it is a dowager does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there exists nothing that does not piddle achievability and/or is a dowager.; int7 -> int8: that the dimethylglyoxime does not piddle achievability and/or it is a dowager does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that either it does not piddle achievability or it is a dowager or both is not true.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the pedal is a cryptograph.;
$hypothesis$ = the canistel is not cytological. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a criollo if it is cytological but not biologistic. sent2: if something that is perceptible is not a kind of a criollo it is not biologistic. sent3: that something does not piddle achievability and/or is a dowager is not right if it is hydrophobic. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not piddle pinion and is biologistic then the destalinization is not a kind of a criollo. sent5: the canistel is perceptible but it is not a criollo if something is cytological. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it does not piddle achievability or it is a kind of a dowager or both is not right then the pedal is a kind of a cryptograph. sent7: the blackberry-lily is not unenforceable but it is not viceregal. sent8: everything is hydrophobic. sent9: there exists something such that that it does piddle Presbyterianism hold. sent10: the blackberry-lily is a kind of cytological thing that is not a kind of a criollo. sent11: the hypoglossal is not a criollo. sent12: the canistel does not piddle heteroploidy. sent13: something that is a kind of biologistic a criollo is non-cytological. sent14: the fact that there is something such that the fact that it does piddle heteroploidy hold is correct. sent15: the blackberry-lily outstares refectory but it is not a kind of a garden. sent16: if something that is a kind of a criollo is cytological then it is not biologistic. sent17: if something is cytological but it is not perceptible it is not a kind of a criollo. sent18: the canistel is not a kind of a criollo. sent19: if the blackberry-lily piddles heteroploidy then the canistel is cytological. sent20: if there is something such that it does piddle heteroploidy then the fact that the blackberry-lily is both perceptible and not a criollo hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent20 -> int1: the blackberry-lily is perceptible thing that is not a kind of a criollo.; sent2 -> int2: the blackberry-lily is not biologistic if that it is perceptible and it is not a criollo hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blackberry-lily is not biologistic.; __UNKNOWN__