that the starlessness does not occur and the emulsifying Kropotkin occurs does not hold.
sent1: the fossorialness happens. sent2: if the starlessness happens the remodeling Fourier occurs. sent3: the emulsifying Kropotkin occurs. sent4: the spamming happens. sent5: if the rogation happens then that the antibioticness but not the adjoining Lamarckism occurs is wrong. sent6: if the fossorialness does not occur then that the basics does not occur and the report does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the catheterization occurs the drumbeat happens. sent8: the adjoining lobbyist does not occur. sent9: the spill but not the nonresidentialness happens. sent10: the remodeling Anniellidae occurs if the orthopticsness occurs. sent11: the nephriticness does not occur. sent12: that the drumbeat does not occur is not false if the report does not occur. sent13: the basicsness happens. sent14: if the fact that the antibiotic happens but the adjoining Lamarckism does not occur is not right then the fossorialness does not occur. sent15: both the remodeling eatage and the non-westernness happens. sent16: the fact that the remodeling devolution happens is not wrong. sent17: if the drumbeat and the exponentiation occurs then the remodeling Fourier does not occur. sent18: that the drumbeat does not occur is caused by that the catheterization happens. sent19: the drumbeat happens if the remodeling Fourier happens and the exponentiation does not occur. sent20: the ossiferousness or the non-valvularness or both happens. sent21: if the fossorialness occurs the catheterization happens and/or the reporting does not occur. sent22: that the exponentiation does not occur is caused by the basicsness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the starlessness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the remodeling Fourier occurs is true.; sent22 & sent13 -> int2: the exponentiation does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the remodeling Fourier occurs and the exponentiation does not occur.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the drumbeat occurs.; sent21 & sent1 -> int5: the catheterization happens or the report does not occur or both.; int5 & sent18 & sent12 -> int6: the drumbeat does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the starlessness does not occur.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the non-starlessness and the emulsifying Kropotkin occurs is not right.
$hypothesis$ = that the starlessness does not occur and the emulsifying Kropotkin occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fossorialness happens. sent2: if the starlessness happens the remodeling Fourier occurs. sent3: the emulsifying Kropotkin occurs. sent4: the spamming happens. sent5: if the rogation happens then that the antibioticness but not the adjoining Lamarckism occurs is wrong. sent6: if the fossorialness does not occur then that the basics does not occur and the report does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the catheterization occurs the drumbeat happens. sent8: the adjoining lobbyist does not occur. sent9: the spill but not the nonresidentialness happens. sent10: the remodeling Anniellidae occurs if the orthopticsness occurs. sent11: the nephriticness does not occur. sent12: that the drumbeat does not occur is not false if the report does not occur. sent13: the basicsness happens. sent14: if the fact that the antibiotic happens but the adjoining Lamarckism does not occur is not right then the fossorialness does not occur. sent15: both the remodeling eatage and the non-westernness happens. sent16: the fact that the remodeling devolution happens is not wrong. sent17: if the drumbeat and the exponentiation occurs then the remodeling Fourier does not occur. sent18: that the drumbeat does not occur is caused by that the catheterization happens. sent19: the drumbeat happens if the remodeling Fourier happens and the exponentiation does not occur. sent20: the ossiferousness or the non-valvularness or both happens. sent21: if the fossorialness occurs the catheterization happens and/or the reporting does not occur. sent22: that the exponentiation does not occur is caused by the basicsness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the starlessness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the remodeling Fourier occurs is true.; sent22 & sent13 -> int2: the exponentiation does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the remodeling Fourier occurs and the exponentiation does not occur.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the drumbeat occurs.; sent21 & sent1 -> int5: the catheterization happens or the report does not occur or both.; int5 & sent18 & sent12 -> int6: the drumbeat does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the starlessness does not occur.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__