there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a ureter is correct it is kinesthetic and/or it is a kind of a bleakness.
sent1: if the percolate is a Russian the monogamist does not negotiate. sent2: the dumbbell does not camber Order. sent3: if the lash is not a kind of a skin then the dumbbell is both granuliferous and not choral. sent4: the dumbbell is unsusceptible. sent5: the fact that the docent restores and does roll expertness is not true if the monogamist does not negotiate. sent6: the Rush is not a kind of a overindulgence. sent7: the dumbbell is not a kind of a overindulgence if it is not a skin. sent8: if that something does restore and it does roll expertness does not hold then it does not restore. sent9: there is something such that if it is a ureter then it is kinesthetic or it is a bleakness or both. sent10: the groundmass is a calomel. sent11: that the dumbbell is not a overindulgence is right. sent12: if the fact that the co-star is not kinesthetic and is a bleakness does not hold the lash is not a skin. sent13: something that skins is kinesthetic. sent14: if the fact that something is a kind of a Gardiner that does not occupy does not hold it is not nonexempt. sent15: the fact that the gangway is a Gardiner and does not occupy does not hold if the docent does not restore. sent16: the dumbbell is not a petrel.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dumbbell does not skin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the dumbbell is not a ureter hold.; sent13 -> int1: the dumbbell is kinesthetic if it is a skin.;
the dumbbell is granuliferous but it is not choral.
sent14 -> int2: the fact that the gangway is not nonexempt is not false if the fact that it is a kind of a Gardiner and it does not occupy is incorrect.; sent8 -> int3: the fact that the docent does not restore if the fact that the docent does restore and it does roll expertness is wrong is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a ureter is correct it is kinesthetic and/or it is a kind of a bleakness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the percolate is a Russian the monogamist does not negotiate. sent2: the dumbbell does not camber Order. sent3: if the lash is not a kind of a skin then the dumbbell is both granuliferous and not choral. sent4: the dumbbell is unsusceptible. sent5: the fact that the docent restores and does roll expertness is not true if the monogamist does not negotiate. sent6: the Rush is not a kind of a overindulgence. sent7: the dumbbell is not a kind of a overindulgence if it is not a skin. sent8: if that something does restore and it does roll expertness does not hold then it does not restore. sent9: there is something such that if it is a ureter then it is kinesthetic or it is a bleakness or both. sent10: the groundmass is a calomel. sent11: that the dumbbell is not a overindulgence is right. sent12: if the fact that the co-star is not kinesthetic and is a bleakness does not hold the lash is not a skin. sent13: something that skins is kinesthetic. sent14: if the fact that something is a kind of a Gardiner that does not occupy does not hold it is not nonexempt. sent15: the fact that the gangway is a Gardiner and does not occupy does not hold if the docent does not restore. sent16: the dumbbell is not a petrel. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dumbbell does not skin.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the dumbbell is not a ureter hold.; sent13 -> int1: the dumbbell is kinesthetic if it is a skin.; __UNKNOWN__