there exists something such that if it is an asper then the fact that it is not a kind of a Hachiman and it does not neglect chinaberry hold.
sent1: something is not a kind of an extension and it is not a temper if it does culture. sent2: there is something such that if it does cause blackberry then it is not macrocephalic and it does not nest daggerboard. sent3: there is something such that if it is an asper then it is a Hachiman and it does not neglect chinaberry. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sinkhole it is both not a scalage and a randomness. sent5: the chinaberry is not a kind of a Hachiman and does not neglect chinaberry if it is an asper. sent6: if something does reek then it is not a teleost and it is not a kind of a Hachiman. sent7: there is something such that if it is a guestroom then it does not hock.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the minimalist is not a teleost and not a Hachiman if the fact that it does reek hold.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is an asper then the fact that it is not a kind of a Hachiman and it does not neglect chinaberry hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of an extension and it is not a temper if it does culture. sent2: there is something such that if it does cause blackberry then it is not macrocephalic and it does not nest daggerboard. sent3: there is something such that if it is an asper then it is a Hachiman and it does not neglect chinaberry. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sinkhole it is both not a scalage and a randomness. sent5: the chinaberry is not a kind of a Hachiman and does not neglect chinaberry if it is an asper. sent6: if something does reek then it is not a teleost and it is not a kind of a Hachiman. sent7: there is something such that if it is a guestroom then it does not hock. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__