the precava is not a unskillfulness.
sent1: the precava is symphonic. sent2: the fact that the cucumber is a leech and it is astigmatic is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the steerage does not transaminate zirconium and it is not a unskillfulness does not hold if the keyhole is a halocarbon. sent4: the keyhole is a halocarbon if the lightwood is astigmatic. sent5: the streptodornase is a vane. sent6: if that something is a gone and does not log parentage is not true then it does letter voyeur. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a Albany the fact that the plunger is a kind of gone thing that does not log parentage is wrong. sent8: the fact that something is a fossil if the fact that it is not a kind of a fossil and is not a kind of a Reykjavik is not correct is right. sent9: if something that does log military letters voyeur then the Shudra does not shrink. sent10: the fact that something is astigmatic and it is a Friedman is not right if it does not transaminate zirconium. sent11: the cucumber is not a halocarbon if the fact that it is not a stove and it is a halocarbon does not hold. sent12: if the fact that that something is not symphonic and does maunder is right does not hold then it is a halocarbon. sent13: if something is a fossil then it is agrypnotic or is not a kind of a dinocerate or both. sent14: the precava does not letter voyeur if that it is not a unskillfulness and it letter voyeur is not right. sent15: that the precava is not bilious but it does log Farsi does not hold. sent16: if that the steerage does not transaminate zirconium and it is not a unskillfulness does not hold then the precava is a kind of a unskillfulness. sent17: if something is not a dinocerate then it logs military. sent18: the fact that the plunger is not a fossil and not a Reykjavik is wrong. sent19: the fact that that the millionairess is a halocarbon that does transaminate steerage is not correct is correct. sent20: if something is a vane it is auricular and it is not a Albany. sent21: if something does not shrink that it is both a Friedman and not a stove is not wrong. sent22: something that is not symphonic and maunders does not transaminate zirconium. sent23: that the cucumber is both not a stove and a halocarbon does not hold. sent24: the precava is not a unskillfulness if that the cucumber is a kind of astigmatic a Friedman does not hold. sent25: a agrypnotic thing logs military.
sent12 -> int1: if that the cucumber is not symphonic but it maunders is incorrect then it is a kind of a halocarbon.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cucumber is not symphonic but it does maunder does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cucumber is a halocarbon.; sent11 & sent23 -> int3: the cucumber is not a halocarbon.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cucumber is a kind of non-symphonic thing that maunders.; sent22 -> int6: that if the cucumber is not symphonic and maunders the cucumber does not transaminate zirconium hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cucumber does not transaminate zirconium.; sent10 -> int8: that the cucumber is astigmatic thing that is a kind of a Friedman is wrong if it does not transaminate zirconium.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the cucumber is astigmatic and is a kind of a Friedman is wrong.; int9 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the precava is a unskillfulness.
sent21 -> int10: the Shudra is a Friedman but it does not stave if it does not shrink.; sent13 -> int11: if the plunger is fossil either it is agrypnotic or it is not a dinocerate or both.; sent8 -> int12: if the fact that the plunger is not a kind of a fossil and it is not a Reykjavik is wrong then it is a fossil.; int12 & sent18 -> int13: the plunger is a fossil.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the plunger is agrypnotic or it is not a dinocerate or both is right.; sent25 -> int15: if the plunger is agrypnotic then it logs military.; sent17 -> int16: the plunger does log military if it is not a dinocerate.; int14 & int15 & int16 -> int17: the plunger logs military.; sent6 -> int18: that the plunger does letter voyeur is true if the fact that it is a kind of a gone and does not log parentage is false.; sent20 -> int19: if the streptodornase is a vane then it is auricular and it is not a kind of a Albany.; int19 & sent5 -> int20: the streptodornase is auricular but it is not a kind of a Albany.; int20 -> int21: the streptodornase is not a Albany.; int21 -> int22: something is not a kind of a Albany.; int22 & sent7 -> int23: the fact that the plunger is gone but it does not log parentage is wrong.; int18 & int23 -> int24: that the plunger does letter voyeur is correct.; int17 & int24 -> int25: the plunger does log military and it letters voyeur.; int25 -> int26: there exists something such that it does log military and letters voyeur.; int26 & sent9 -> int27: the Shudra does not shrink.; int10 & int27 -> int28: the Shudra is a Friedman but it is not a kind of a stove.; int28 -> int29: there is something such that it is a kind of a Friedman that is not a stove.;
$hypothesis$ = the precava is not a unskillfulness. ; $context$ = sent1: the precava is symphonic. sent2: the fact that the cucumber is a leech and it is astigmatic is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the steerage does not transaminate zirconium and it is not a unskillfulness does not hold if the keyhole is a halocarbon. sent4: the keyhole is a halocarbon if the lightwood is astigmatic. sent5: the streptodornase is a vane. sent6: if that something is a gone and does not log parentage is not true then it does letter voyeur. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a Albany the fact that the plunger is a kind of gone thing that does not log parentage is wrong. sent8: the fact that something is a fossil if the fact that it is not a kind of a fossil and is not a kind of a Reykjavik is not correct is right. sent9: if something that does log military letters voyeur then the Shudra does not shrink. sent10: the fact that something is astigmatic and it is a Friedman is not right if it does not transaminate zirconium. sent11: the cucumber is not a halocarbon if the fact that it is not a stove and it is a halocarbon does not hold. sent12: if the fact that that something is not symphonic and does maunder is right does not hold then it is a halocarbon. sent13: if something is a fossil then it is agrypnotic or is not a kind of a dinocerate or both. sent14: the precava does not letter voyeur if that it is not a unskillfulness and it letter voyeur is not right. sent15: that the precava is not bilious but it does log Farsi does not hold. sent16: if that the steerage does not transaminate zirconium and it is not a unskillfulness does not hold then the precava is a kind of a unskillfulness. sent17: if something is not a dinocerate then it logs military. sent18: the fact that the plunger is not a fossil and not a Reykjavik is wrong. sent19: the fact that that the millionairess is a halocarbon that does transaminate steerage is not correct is correct. sent20: if something is a vane it is auricular and it is not a Albany. sent21: if something does not shrink that it is both a Friedman and not a stove is not wrong. sent22: something that is not symphonic and maunders does not transaminate zirconium. sent23: that the cucumber is both not a stove and a halocarbon does not hold. sent24: the precava is not a unskillfulness if that the cucumber is a kind of astigmatic a Friedman does not hold. sent25: a agrypnotic thing logs military. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if that the cucumber is not symphonic but it maunders is incorrect then it is a kind of a halocarbon.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cucumber is not symphonic but it does maunder does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cucumber is a halocarbon.; sent11 & sent23 -> int3: the cucumber is not a halocarbon.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cucumber is a kind of non-symphonic thing that maunders.; sent22 -> int6: that if the cucumber is not symphonic and maunders the cucumber does not transaminate zirconium hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cucumber does not transaminate zirconium.; sent10 -> int8: that the cucumber is astigmatic thing that is a kind of a Friedman is wrong if it does not transaminate zirconium.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the cucumber is astigmatic and is a kind of a Friedman is wrong.; int9 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__