the fact that the culm is not a vac or it does not ogle echinocactus or both is incorrect.
sent1: the culm is not non-thermohydrometric but a khanate. sent2: something is not a vac and/or it does ogle echinocactus if it is thermohydrometric. sent3: something that is thermohydrometric is a vac or does not ogle echinocactus or both. sent4: if the culm is thermohydrometric then it is a vac and/or it does not ogle echinocactus. sent5: that either something is not a kind of a vac or it does not ogle echinocactus or both hold if it is thermohydrometric.
sent5 -> int1: the culm is not a kind of a vac or it does not ogle echinocactus or both if it is thermohydrometric.; sent1 -> int2: the culm is thermohydrometric.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the culm is not a vac or it does not ogle echinocactus or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the culm is not non-thermohydrometric but a khanate. sent2: something is not a vac and/or it does ogle echinocactus if it is thermohydrometric. sent3: something that is thermohydrometric is a vac or does not ogle echinocactus or both. sent4: if the culm is thermohydrometric then it is a vac and/or it does not ogle echinocactus. sent5: that either something is not a kind of a vac or it does not ogle echinocactus or both hold if it is thermohydrometric. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the culm is not a kind of a vac or it does not ogle echinocactus or both if it is thermohydrometric.; sent1 -> int2: the culm is thermohydrometric.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__