the juke does not understand or is not preclinical or both.
sent1: the fact that something is non-earthly thing that is not a creepy-crawly is false if that it does fragment registered is not true. sent2: the juke fragments registered and it compartmentalizes pornographer. sent3: the juke understands and/or is not preclinical. sent4: if something does top then that it is anti and it does not fragment registered does not hold. sent5: the juke does not understand or is preclinical or both. sent6: everything salts malabsorption. sent7: the juke is a kind of a creepy-crawly. sent8: the meprobamate does not fragment registered if the fact that the tetracaine is an anti and does not fragment registered is not right. sent9: that something either does not understand or is not preclinical or both is wrong if it does not salt malabsorption. sent10: the juke does compartmentalize gamesmanship. sent11: if something that does salt malabsorption is a kind of a creepy-crawly the fact that it does not understand hold. sent12: if the carboxyl does salt abrogator and is auscultatory it is not a profession. sent13: everything is mercuric. sent14: if the quince is a creepy-crawly the convert salts malabsorption. sent15: everything reneges. sent16: everything is visceral. sent17: the fact that the antisyphilitic is agonadal and it does understand hold. sent18: everything is a blueberry. sent19: if that the meprobamate is not earthly and it is not a creepy-crawly is wrong then the quince is a creepy-crawly. sent20: either the juke is not a creepy-crawly or it is not a Selma or both. sent21: the juke is not preclinical and/or is not an absolutist.
sent6 -> int1: the juke does salt malabsorption.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the juke does salt malabsorption and is a kind of a creepy-crawly.; sent11 -> int3: if the juke does salt malabsorption and is a creepy-crawly then it does not understand.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the juke does not understand is not false.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the juke does not understand or it is not preclinical or both does not hold.
sent9 -> int5: if the juke does not salt malabsorption the fact that the fact that it does not understand and/or it is not preclinical is correct does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the juke does not understand or is not preclinical or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is non-earthly thing that is not a creepy-crawly is false if that it does fragment registered is not true. sent2: the juke fragments registered and it compartmentalizes pornographer. sent3: the juke understands and/or is not preclinical. sent4: if something does top then that it is anti and it does not fragment registered does not hold. sent5: the juke does not understand or is preclinical or both. sent6: everything salts malabsorption. sent7: the juke is a kind of a creepy-crawly. sent8: the meprobamate does not fragment registered if the fact that the tetracaine is an anti and does not fragment registered is not right. sent9: that something either does not understand or is not preclinical or both is wrong if it does not salt malabsorption. sent10: the juke does compartmentalize gamesmanship. sent11: if something that does salt malabsorption is a kind of a creepy-crawly the fact that it does not understand hold. sent12: if the carboxyl does salt abrogator and is auscultatory it is not a profession. sent13: everything is mercuric. sent14: if the quince is a creepy-crawly the convert salts malabsorption. sent15: everything reneges. sent16: everything is visceral. sent17: the fact that the antisyphilitic is agonadal and it does understand hold. sent18: everything is a blueberry. sent19: if that the meprobamate is not earthly and it is not a creepy-crawly is wrong then the quince is a creepy-crawly. sent20: either the juke is not a creepy-crawly or it is not a Selma or both. sent21: the juke is not preclinical and/or is not an absolutist. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the juke does salt malabsorption.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the juke does salt malabsorption and is a kind of a creepy-crawly.; sent11 -> int3: if the juke does salt malabsorption and is a creepy-crawly then it does not understand.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the juke does not understand is not false.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__