that the chough is a watercolor does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that there exists something such that it is a kind of a hagiolatry and/or it is antimonic is not incorrect then that the chough is antimonic is not false. sent2: if something is not a Lygus then that it does not orchestrate counterfactuality and it burglarizes aeciospore is not right. sent3: if that the fashion is not euphoric and is not a kind of a hagiolatry does not hold then the fact that the mesophyte is not euphoric is not wrong. sent4: the appetizer burglarizes blastomycete if the bondwoman does burglarizes blastomycete and/or it is not apocynaceous. sent5: the Pawnee is euphoric if the mesophyte is euphoric. sent6: either the Pawnee is a hagiolatry or it is antimonic or both. sent7: that something either is not sexagesimal or is a Lygus or both is not true if it is euphoric. sent8: the mesophyte is euphoric if there is something such that the fact that it is not a hagiolatry and it does not burglarize blastomycete is not correct. sent9: the fact that something does not burglarize Moon and it is not sexagesimal does not hold if it is not antimonic. sent10: the blastomycete is a swab. sent11: something does not burglarize Moon if that it does not burglarize drill and it is a wanderer is not true. sent12: if the Pawnee is a kind of euphoric thing that is a watercolor then it is not antimonic. sent13: the chough is not a watercolor if it does not burglarize Moon and is not non-antimonic. sent14: the fact that the fashion is not a kind of a watercolor and does not burglarize Falstaff is incorrect. sent15: if the Pawnee is a kind of a Lygus the fact that the chough is a watercolor hold. sent16: the chough is euphoric. sent17: the fact that the fact that the blastomycete is not dyslexic and not non-minus is wrong hold if it is a swab. sent18: the bondwoman is not minus if the fact that the blastomycete is non-dyslexic thing that is minus is incorrect. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hagiolatry and it does not burglarize blastomycete is not true. sent20: the mesophyte does burglarize Moon and it is antimonic if it is not euphoric. sent21: the bondwoman either burglarizes blastomycete or is non-apocynaceous or both if it is not minus. sent22: that something is non-euphoric thing that is not a hagiolatry is wrong if the fact that it burglarizes Falstaff is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chough does not burglarize drill and is a wanderer.; sent7 -> int1: if the chough is euphoric the fact that that it is either not sexagesimal or a Lygus or both is not incorrect does not hold.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the chough is not sexagesimal or is a kind of a Lygus or both is not right.; sent11 -> int3: if the fact that the chough does not burglarize drill and is a wanderer is wrong it does not burglarize Moon.; sent6 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a hagiolatry and/or it is antimonic.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the chough is antimonic.;
the chough is a watercolor.
sent22 -> int6: the fact that the fashion is not euphoric and not a hagiolatry is incorrect if it does burglarize Falstaff.; sent17 & sent10 -> int7: that the blastomycete is non-dyslexic thing that is minus is not correct.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the bondwoman is non-minus.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the bondwoman burglarizes blastomycete or is not apocynaceous or both.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the appetizer burglarizes blastomycete.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it burglarizes blastomycete.;
$hypothesis$ = that the chough is a watercolor does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that there exists something such that it is a kind of a hagiolatry and/or it is antimonic is not incorrect then that the chough is antimonic is not false. sent2: if something is not a Lygus then that it does not orchestrate counterfactuality and it burglarizes aeciospore is not right. sent3: if that the fashion is not euphoric and is not a kind of a hagiolatry does not hold then the fact that the mesophyte is not euphoric is not wrong. sent4: the appetizer burglarizes blastomycete if the bondwoman does burglarizes blastomycete and/or it is not apocynaceous. sent5: the Pawnee is euphoric if the mesophyte is euphoric. sent6: either the Pawnee is a hagiolatry or it is antimonic or both. sent7: that something either is not sexagesimal or is a Lygus or both is not true if it is euphoric. sent8: the mesophyte is euphoric if there is something such that the fact that it is not a hagiolatry and it does not burglarize blastomycete is not correct. sent9: the fact that something does not burglarize Moon and it is not sexagesimal does not hold if it is not antimonic. sent10: the blastomycete is a swab. sent11: something does not burglarize Moon if that it does not burglarize drill and it is a wanderer is not true. sent12: if the Pawnee is a kind of euphoric thing that is a watercolor then it is not antimonic. sent13: the chough is not a watercolor if it does not burglarize Moon and is not non-antimonic. sent14: the fact that the fashion is not a kind of a watercolor and does not burglarize Falstaff is incorrect. sent15: if the Pawnee is a kind of a Lygus the fact that the chough is a watercolor hold. sent16: the chough is euphoric. sent17: the fact that the fact that the blastomycete is not dyslexic and not non-minus is wrong hold if it is a swab. sent18: the bondwoman is not minus if the fact that the blastomycete is non-dyslexic thing that is minus is incorrect. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hagiolatry and it does not burglarize blastomycete is not true. sent20: the mesophyte does burglarize Moon and it is antimonic if it is not euphoric. sent21: the bondwoman either burglarizes blastomycete or is non-apocynaceous or both if it is not minus. sent22: that something is non-euphoric thing that is not a hagiolatry is wrong if the fact that it burglarizes Falstaff is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chough does not burglarize drill and is a wanderer.; sent7 -> int1: if the chough is euphoric the fact that that it is either not sexagesimal or a Lygus or both is not incorrect does not hold.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the chough is not sexagesimal or is a kind of a Lygus or both is not right.; sent11 -> int3: if the fact that the chough does not burglarize drill and is a wanderer is wrong it does not burglarize Moon.; sent6 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a hagiolatry and/or it is antimonic.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the chough is antimonic.; __UNKNOWN__