the combat occurs but the submersibleness does not occur if the reding pyocyanin does not occur.
sent1: the submersible does not occur if the reding pyocyanin does not occur. sent2: the reding pyocyanin happens if the lockage happens. sent3: that not the lockage but the indoorness happens yields the non-sophisticness. sent4: that the shooing voiced does not occur leads to that the subdivision and the victimization happens. sent5: that the combat occurs and the submersible does not occur is brought about by the non-sophisticness. sent6: that the reding pyocyanin occurs is not wrong if the fact that the lockage does not occur but the indoorness happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that not the lockage but the indoorness happens is incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reding pyocyanin occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the reding pyocyanin does not occur hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the lockage does not occur but the indoorness happens.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the sophisticness does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the combat but not the submersibleness happens.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the combat occurs but the submersibleness does not occur if the reding pyocyanin does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the submersible does not occur if the reding pyocyanin does not occur. sent2: the reding pyocyanin happens if the lockage happens. sent3: that not the lockage but the indoorness happens yields the non-sophisticness. sent4: that the shooing voiced does not occur leads to that the subdivision and the victimization happens. sent5: that the combat occurs and the submersible does not occur is brought about by the non-sophisticness. sent6: that the reding pyocyanin occurs is not wrong if the fact that the lockage does not occur but the indoorness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that not the lockage but the indoorness happens is incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reding pyocyanin occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the reding pyocyanin does not occur hold.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the lockage does not occur but the indoorness happens.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the sophisticness does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the combat but not the submersibleness happens.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__