the impelling daisybush does not occur.
sent1: the Catholic happens. sent2: the impelling Seyhan happens. sent3: that the impelling babu does not occur is caused by that the impelling energy happens and/or that the serviceableness happens. sent4: the impelling Seyhan does not occur if the veinalness does not occur. sent5: the shunning Michigander happens. sent6: the fact that if the serviceableness does not occur then the fact that the impelling daisybush happens and the impelling energy occurs does not hold is true. sent7: the motley does not occur if the fact that the motley but not the impelling energy occurs is not right. sent8: the fact that the overreaching bowsprit but not the Catholic happens is incorrect if that the impelling Seyhan does not occur hold. sent9: if the praise but not the impelling babu happens the fact that the serviceableness does not occur is correct. sent10: the overreaching bowsprit and the Catholicness occurs. sent11: the impelling babu does not occur if the serviceableness happens. sent12: that the praising does not occur is triggered by that the impelling energy does not occur. sent13: if that the impelling Seyhan occurs is not wrong then the impelling babu happens. sent14: if that not the praising but the overreaching bowsprit happens is not incorrect then the impelling daisybush happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impelling energy occurs.; assump1 -> int1: either the impelling energy or the serviceableness or both occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the impelling babu does not occur.; sent13 & sent2 -> int3: the impelling babu occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the impelling energy does not occur.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the praising does not occur.; sent10 -> int7: that the overreaching bowsprit occurs is not false.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the praise does not occur but the overreaching bowsprit occurs.; int8 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the impelling daisybush does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the impelling daisybush does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the Catholic happens. sent2: the impelling Seyhan happens. sent3: that the impelling babu does not occur is caused by that the impelling energy happens and/or that the serviceableness happens. sent4: the impelling Seyhan does not occur if the veinalness does not occur. sent5: the shunning Michigander happens. sent6: the fact that if the serviceableness does not occur then the fact that the impelling daisybush happens and the impelling energy occurs does not hold is true. sent7: the motley does not occur if the fact that the motley but not the impelling energy occurs is not right. sent8: the fact that the overreaching bowsprit but not the Catholic happens is incorrect if that the impelling Seyhan does not occur hold. sent9: if the praise but not the impelling babu happens the fact that the serviceableness does not occur is correct. sent10: the overreaching bowsprit and the Catholicness occurs. sent11: the impelling babu does not occur if the serviceableness happens. sent12: that the praising does not occur is triggered by that the impelling energy does not occur. sent13: if that the impelling Seyhan occurs is not wrong then the impelling babu happens. sent14: if that not the praising but the overreaching bowsprit happens is not incorrect then the impelling daisybush happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the impelling energy occurs.; assump1 -> int1: either the impelling energy or the serviceableness or both occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the impelling babu does not occur.; sent13 & sent2 -> int3: the impelling babu occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the impelling energy does not occur.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the praising does not occur.; sent10 -> int7: that the overreaching bowsprit occurs is not false.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the praise does not occur but the overreaching bowsprit occurs.; int8 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__