the wassail is not Levitical.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a swag then that it is a roofer and it does not roll bullfrog is not correct. sent2: that the ammobium is not a kind of a wilt but it is a roofer does not hold if the garbageman does wilt. sent3: if the fact that something is both not archiepiscopal and educational does not hold then it is Levitical. sent4: the garbageman is a wilt if the fact that the traction is not diazo and/or it is not a kind of a commuter is not correct. sent5: if that the firebox is archiepiscopal is right then the traction is diazo. sent6: that the ammobium is a roofer and it does roll bullfrog is wrong if it is not a kind of a swag. sent7: if the effecter does roll overskirt that the endosteum does roll overskirt and rolls neurotropism does not hold. sent8: the fact that the ammobium is a roofer and does roll bullfrog does not hold. sent9: the ammobium is not a kind of a swag if that the endosteum does not roll overskirt but it rolls neurotropism is false. sent10: the traction is diazo. sent11: there exists something such that it is a roofer and it does not roll bullfrog. sent12: the ammobium is not a swag if the endosteum does roll overskirt. sent13: the wassail is not Levitical if there exists something such that the fact that it is a roofer and it does not roll bullfrog does not hold. sent14: the firebox is educational and it is archiepiscopal. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it is a roofer that rolls bullfrog does not hold. sent16: the fact that the endosteum rolls overskirt and it does roll neurotropism does not hold. sent17: if the firebox is archiepiscopal the fact that the traction is either not diazo or not a commuter or both is not correct. sent18: the fact that something is a kind of a roofer that does roll bullfrog is incorrect if it is not a swag. sent19: the fact that the endosteum does not roll overskirt but it does roll neurotropism is not right if the effecter roll overskirt. sent20: if there is something such that it does roll bullfrog the wassail is not Levitical.
sent14 -> int1: the firebox is archiepiscopal.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the traction is not diazo or is not a commuter or both is wrong.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the garbageman is a wilt.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the ammobium is a kind of a roofer and does not roll bullfrog is not right if the fact that it swags is not correct.;
the wassail is Levitical.
sent3 -> int5: if that the wassail is not archiepiscopal but it is educational is false it is Levitical.;
$hypothesis$ = the wassail is not Levitical. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a swag then that it is a roofer and it does not roll bullfrog is not correct. sent2: that the ammobium is not a kind of a wilt but it is a roofer does not hold if the garbageman does wilt. sent3: if the fact that something is both not archiepiscopal and educational does not hold then it is Levitical. sent4: the garbageman is a wilt if the fact that the traction is not diazo and/or it is not a kind of a commuter is not correct. sent5: if that the firebox is archiepiscopal is right then the traction is diazo. sent6: that the ammobium is a roofer and it does roll bullfrog is wrong if it is not a kind of a swag. sent7: if the effecter does roll overskirt that the endosteum does roll overskirt and rolls neurotropism does not hold. sent8: the fact that the ammobium is a roofer and does roll bullfrog does not hold. sent9: the ammobium is not a kind of a swag if that the endosteum does not roll overskirt but it rolls neurotropism is false. sent10: the traction is diazo. sent11: there exists something such that it is a roofer and it does not roll bullfrog. sent12: the ammobium is not a swag if the endosteum does roll overskirt. sent13: the wassail is not Levitical if there exists something such that the fact that it is a roofer and it does not roll bullfrog does not hold. sent14: the firebox is educational and it is archiepiscopal. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it is a roofer that rolls bullfrog does not hold. sent16: the fact that the endosteum rolls overskirt and it does roll neurotropism does not hold. sent17: if the firebox is archiepiscopal the fact that the traction is either not diazo or not a commuter or both is not correct. sent18: the fact that something is a kind of a roofer that does roll bullfrog is incorrect if it is not a swag. sent19: the fact that the endosteum does not roll overskirt but it does roll neurotropism is not right if the effecter roll overskirt. sent20: if there is something such that it does roll bullfrog the wassail is not Levitical. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the firebox is archiepiscopal.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the traction is not diazo or is not a commuter or both is wrong.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the garbageman is a wilt.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the ammobium is a kind of a roofer and does not roll bullfrog is not right if the fact that it swags is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__