the A-line does not seep griddle.
sent1: the catbird does sag Kobus. sent2: if something does seep revival then it dictates retreatant. sent3: if the gayal ejaculates lean-to the A-line seeps griddle. sent4: The Kobus does sag catbird. sent5: there is nothing such that it does not sag Kobus and it does dictate retreatant. sent6: the gayal is a Omphalotus and/or publicizes if it does not ejaculate lean-to. sent7: the A-line does not ejaculate lean-to. sent8: if the fact that something does not ejaculate lean-to but it does seep griddle is wrong it does not seep griddle. sent9: that if the catbird does sag Kobus then the catbird seeps revival is correct. sent10: if the gayal is a Omphalotus then the catbird does not dictate retreatant. sent11: if that the gayal publicizes is correct that the catbird does not dictate retreatant is correct. sent12: the gayal is precocious or it is a Omphalotus or both. sent13: the teletypewriter is a kind of a Omphalotus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gayal does not ejaculate lean-to.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the gayal is a Omphalotus or does publicize or both.; int1 & sent10 & sent11 -> int2: that the catbird does not dictate retreatant is right.; sent2 -> int3: the catbird dictates retreatant if it seeps revival.; sent9 & sent1 -> int4: the catbird seeps revival.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the catbird does dictate retreatant.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the gayal ejaculates lean-to.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the A-line does not seep griddle.
sent8 -> int8: the A-line does not seep griddle if the fact that it does not ejaculate lean-to and it does seep griddle is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the A-line does not seep griddle. ; $context$ = sent1: the catbird does sag Kobus. sent2: if something does seep revival then it dictates retreatant. sent3: if the gayal ejaculates lean-to the A-line seeps griddle. sent4: The Kobus does sag catbird. sent5: there is nothing such that it does not sag Kobus and it does dictate retreatant. sent6: the gayal is a Omphalotus and/or publicizes if it does not ejaculate lean-to. sent7: the A-line does not ejaculate lean-to. sent8: if the fact that something does not ejaculate lean-to but it does seep griddle is wrong it does not seep griddle. sent9: that if the catbird does sag Kobus then the catbird seeps revival is correct. sent10: if the gayal is a Omphalotus then the catbird does not dictate retreatant. sent11: if that the gayal publicizes is correct that the catbird does not dictate retreatant is correct. sent12: the gayal is precocious or it is a Omphalotus or both. sent13: the teletypewriter is a kind of a Omphalotus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gayal does not ejaculate lean-to.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the gayal is a Omphalotus or does publicize or both.; int1 & sent10 & sent11 -> int2: that the catbird does not dictate retreatant is right.; sent2 -> int3: the catbird dictates retreatant if it seeps revival.; sent9 & sent1 -> int4: the catbird seeps revival.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the catbird does dictate retreatant.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the gayal ejaculates lean-to.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__