the fact that there exists something such that if it stumbles caldera and it is unfaithful then that it is a anxiolytic is incorrect is not right.
sent1: if the ten does dogmatize but it is not a Vladivostok then it does not whitewash. sent2: if the ten does stumble caldera and is not faithful it is a kind of a anxiolytic. sent3: there is something such that if it does count nyctophobia and it is relevant then it does not exit. sent4: something is not a anxiolytic if it does stumble caldera and it is unfaithful. sent5: if the knight-errant is a bread and it does stoke ten it is not a kind of a galantine. sent6: there is something such that if it does stumble caldera and is not a faithful then it is a anxiolytic. sent7: that the ten is not anxiolytic is correct if the fact that it stumbles caldera and is a kind of a faithful hold.
sent4 -> int1: the ten is not a anxiolytic if it does stumble caldera and is not faithful.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it stumbles caldera and it is unfaithful then that it is a anxiolytic is incorrect is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ten does dogmatize but it is not a Vladivostok then it does not whitewash. sent2: if the ten does stumble caldera and is not faithful it is a kind of a anxiolytic. sent3: there is something such that if it does count nyctophobia and it is relevant then it does not exit. sent4: something is not a anxiolytic if it does stumble caldera and it is unfaithful. sent5: if the knight-errant is a bread and it does stoke ten it is not a kind of a galantine. sent6: there is something such that if it does stumble caldera and is not a faithful then it is a anxiolytic. sent7: that the ten is not anxiolytic is correct if the fact that it stumbles caldera and is a kind of a faithful hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the ten is not a anxiolytic if it does stumble caldera and is not faithful.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__