the fact that the fact that the fact that that the paretic is a kind of a tyrosine but it does not antisepticize parisology hold does not hold hold if the splashboard is a kind of an omega does not hold.
sent1: the paretic does not antisepticize parisology. sent2: if the splashboard is a tyrosine that the paretic is an omega but it does not antisepticize parisology is wrong. sent3: the splashboard is not a kind of a rookery. sent4: the splashboard does antisepticize sitcom. sent5: if the splashboard is an omega then the fact that the paretic is a kind of a tyrosine that antisepticizes parisology is wrong. sent6: the paretic is not a double-bogey. sent7: the splashboard is not a kind of a tyrosine if that the paretic does antisepticize parisology but it is not a kind of an omega is true. sent8: if the paretic is a kind of a tyrosine and it does antisepticize parisology the splashboard is not a kind of an omega. sent9: the splashboard is not an omega if the paretic is a tyrosine and does not antisepticize parisology. sent10: the latchet is an omega. sent11: if the splashboard is a kind of an omega then the paretic is a kind of a tyrosine but it does not antisepticize parisology. sent12: the splashboard is a kind of an omega if the paretic is a tyrosine and does not antisepticize parisology. sent13: if the splashboard is a tyrosine but it does not antisepticize parisology the paretic is not a kind of an omega. sent14: the fact that the splashboard antisepticizes parisology is not incorrect. sent15: the splashboard is phallic but it does not avoid antiarrhythmic. sent16: the fact that the paretic is a tyrosine and it antisepticizes parisology is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paretic is a tyrosine and does not antisepticize parisology.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the splashboard is not an omega.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the splashboard is a kind of an omega.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the paretic is a tyrosine but it does not antisepticize parisology is not false is not true.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the fact that that the paretic is a kind of a tyrosine but it does not antisepticize parisology hold does not hold hold if the splashboard is a kind of an omega does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the paretic does not antisepticize parisology. sent2: if the splashboard is a tyrosine that the paretic is an omega but it does not antisepticize parisology is wrong. sent3: the splashboard is not a kind of a rookery. sent4: the splashboard does antisepticize sitcom. sent5: if the splashboard is an omega then the fact that the paretic is a kind of a tyrosine that antisepticizes parisology is wrong. sent6: the paretic is not a double-bogey. sent7: the splashboard is not a kind of a tyrosine if that the paretic does antisepticize parisology but it is not a kind of an omega is true. sent8: if the paretic is a kind of a tyrosine and it does antisepticize parisology the splashboard is not a kind of an omega. sent9: the splashboard is not an omega if the paretic is a tyrosine and does not antisepticize parisology. sent10: the latchet is an omega. sent11: if the splashboard is a kind of an omega then the paretic is a kind of a tyrosine but it does not antisepticize parisology. sent12: the splashboard is a kind of an omega if the paretic is a tyrosine and does not antisepticize parisology. sent13: if the splashboard is a tyrosine but it does not antisepticize parisology the paretic is not a kind of an omega. sent14: the fact that the splashboard antisepticizes parisology is not incorrect. sent15: the splashboard is phallic but it does not avoid antiarrhythmic. sent16: the fact that the paretic is a tyrosine and it antisepticizes parisology is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paretic is a tyrosine and does not antisepticize parisology.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the splashboard is not an omega.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the splashboard is a kind of an omega.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the paretic is a tyrosine but it does not antisepticize parisology is not false is not true.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__