if the fact that the extralinguisticness occurs is true then the bioterrorism does not occur.
sent1: if the amicableness does not occur and the landscaping does not occur then the Linnaeanness happens. sent2: if the fact that the scalicness but not the clamoring Myrsine happens is false the bioterrorism does not occur. sent3: the bioterrorism happens. sent4: the listing happens if the naiveness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the potential occurs but the peroration does not occur does not hold then the maneuvering does not occur. sent6: if that the attritionalness occurs and the nudging does not occur does not hold then the peroration does not occur. sent7: that the loft and the monopolizing overhang happens does not hold. sent8: if the unportableness does not occur then the amicableness does not occur and the landscaping does not occur. sent9: the circularization and the uncivilness occurs. sent10: the fact that the boisterousness and the tribulating camail occurs is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the pregnantness does not occur is not false. sent12: the fact that the boisterousness occurs but the transgressing does not occur is false. sent13: if that both the washing-up and the non-extralinguisticness occurs is not true the unportableness does not occur. sent14: the naturalness happens. sent15: if the extralinguisticness occurs then the bioterrorism happens. sent16: the amicableness does not occur if the unportableness does not occur. sent17: the circumduction is prevented by either that the washing-up happens or the extralinguisticness or both. sent18: the subjectiveness happens and the tribulating Ottawa does not occur. sent19: the fact that the scalicness happens but the clamoring Myrsine does not occur is wrong if the Linnaeanness happens. sent20: the washing-up occurs. sent21: the shuffle does not occur if the washing-up does not occur but the extralinguisticness occurs. sent22: if the tribulating Rickenbacker occurs then the landfall does not occur. sent23: the Linnaeanness occurs if the amicableness occurs but the landscaping does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the washing-up and the non-extralinguisticness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the extralinguisticness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the extralinguisticness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the washing-up and the non-extralinguisticness occurs is wrong.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the unportableness does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the amicableness does not occur and the landscaping does not occur.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the Linnaeanness happens.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the fact that the scalicness but not the clamoring Myrsine occurs is not right.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the bioterrorism does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the shuffle does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the extralinguisticness occurs is true then the bioterrorism does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the amicableness does not occur and the landscaping does not occur then the Linnaeanness happens. sent2: if the fact that the scalicness but not the clamoring Myrsine happens is false the bioterrorism does not occur. sent3: the bioterrorism happens. sent4: the listing happens if the naiveness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the potential occurs but the peroration does not occur does not hold then the maneuvering does not occur. sent6: if that the attritionalness occurs and the nudging does not occur does not hold then the peroration does not occur. sent7: that the loft and the monopolizing overhang happens does not hold. sent8: if the unportableness does not occur then the amicableness does not occur and the landscaping does not occur. sent9: the circularization and the uncivilness occurs. sent10: the fact that the boisterousness and the tribulating camail occurs is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the pregnantness does not occur is not false. sent12: the fact that the boisterousness occurs but the transgressing does not occur is false. sent13: if that both the washing-up and the non-extralinguisticness occurs is not true the unportableness does not occur. sent14: the naturalness happens. sent15: if the extralinguisticness occurs then the bioterrorism happens. sent16: the amicableness does not occur if the unportableness does not occur. sent17: the circumduction is prevented by either that the washing-up happens or the extralinguisticness or both. sent18: the subjectiveness happens and the tribulating Ottawa does not occur. sent19: the fact that the scalicness happens but the clamoring Myrsine does not occur is wrong if the Linnaeanness happens. sent20: the washing-up occurs. sent21: the shuffle does not occur if the washing-up does not occur but the extralinguisticness occurs. sent22: if the tribulating Rickenbacker occurs then the landfall does not occur. sent23: the Linnaeanness occurs if the amicableness occurs but the landscaping does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the washing-up and the non-extralinguisticness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the extralinguisticness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the extralinguisticness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the washing-up and the non-extralinguisticness occurs is wrong.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the unportableness does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the amicableness does not occur and the landscaping does not occur.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the Linnaeanness happens.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the fact that the scalicness but not the clamoring Myrsine occurs is not right.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the bioterrorism does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__