the impersonator does carbonate Lutheran.
sent1: there exists nothing such that it is an infamy and it is protective. sent2: the wince is protective but it is not untruthful if the soloist is not an infamy. sent3: if the soloist is a Brahui then the Liquidambar is a nobelium. sent4: the platform does not prawn. sent5: the Liquidambar is protective thing that is Kurdish. sent6: that the wince is untruthful if the Liquidambar is a kind of a Brunhild that is not untruthful is not wrong. sent7: something is a cordon if it is untruthful. sent8: if the Liquidambar is untruthful then it is a Brahui. sent9: the fact that the Liquidambar is untruthful is true. sent10: if the Liquidambar is protective a Brahui then the platform is not an infamy. sent11: if the platform is not untruthful the Liquidambar does not carbonate Lutheran but it is a Brahui. sent12: if the wince is protective but it is truthful then the platform is not truthful. sent13: the wince is a Brunhild if the platform is not an infamy. sent14: if something is a kind of a principled then the fact that it is Kurdish hold. sent15: the impersonator carbonates Lutheran if the soloist is a nobelium. sent16: the impersonator does not carbonate Lutheran if the fact that the Liquidambar does not carbonate Lutheran but it is a Brahui is not incorrect. sent17: the Liquidambar is Kurdish. sent18: the wince is a Brahui if there exists something such that that it is an infamy and it is protective is wrong.
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the Liquidambar is a Brahui.; sent5 -> int2: the Liquidambar is protective.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Liquidambar is not unprotective and it is a Brahui.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the platform is not an infamy.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the wince is a kind of a Brunhild.;
the impersonator does not carbonate Lutheran.
sent14 -> int6: the clansman is Kurdish if it is a principled.;
$hypothesis$ = the impersonator does carbonate Lutheran. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists nothing such that it is an infamy and it is protective. sent2: the wince is protective but it is not untruthful if the soloist is not an infamy. sent3: if the soloist is a Brahui then the Liquidambar is a nobelium. sent4: the platform does not prawn. sent5: the Liquidambar is protective thing that is Kurdish. sent6: that the wince is untruthful if the Liquidambar is a kind of a Brunhild that is not untruthful is not wrong. sent7: something is a cordon if it is untruthful. sent8: if the Liquidambar is untruthful then it is a Brahui. sent9: the fact that the Liquidambar is untruthful is true. sent10: if the Liquidambar is protective a Brahui then the platform is not an infamy. sent11: if the platform is not untruthful the Liquidambar does not carbonate Lutheran but it is a Brahui. sent12: if the wince is protective but it is truthful then the platform is not truthful. sent13: the wince is a Brunhild if the platform is not an infamy. sent14: if something is a kind of a principled then the fact that it is Kurdish hold. sent15: the impersonator carbonates Lutheran if the soloist is a nobelium. sent16: the impersonator does not carbonate Lutheran if the fact that the Liquidambar does not carbonate Lutheran but it is a Brahui is not incorrect. sent17: the Liquidambar is Kurdish. sent18: the wince is a Brahui if there exists something such that that it is an infamy and it is protective is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the Liquidambar is a Brahui.; sent5 -> int2: the Liquidambar is protective.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Liquidambar is not unprotective and it is a Brahui.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the platform is not an infamy.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the wince is a kind of a Brunhild.; __UNKNOWN__