the strapless is not autoplastic.
sent1: if something that is not wet is not an abuse then it is not pineal. sent2: if that something is wet but it is not an abuse does not hold then it is not pineal. sent3: that the investment is both isthmian and a stipend is not right. sent4: either the investment abuses or it is isthmian or both. sent5: if there is something such that it is not isthmian then the enologist does go. sent6: if the cerivastatin does not admeasure sacerdotalism the enologist does admeasure sacerdotalism. sent7: the cerivastatin is a kind of a bonbon and it rises if something is a kind of a baron. sent8: if the fact that the cerivastatin is a kind of a bonbon is not false then the enologist caucuses toff. sent9: if something does go that it is pineal is correct. sent10: there is something such that it is a kind of a baron. sent11: if the strapless is not pineal then it is autoplastic and a go. sent12: the cerivastatin does not admeasure sacerdotalism. sent13: the cerivastatin is worldly and it does caucus toff. sent14: the strapless is not worldly if the enologist caucuses toff and is a Sanchez. sent15: there is something such that it is worldly. sent16: the cerivastatin abuses if the enologist is pineal and/or it is not wet. sent17: the cerivastatin is a stipend that does caucus toff. sent18: there exists something such that it abuses. sent19: the strapless is not autoplastic if something that is an abuse is worldly. sent20: the fact that something does wet and is not an abuse is not correct if it is not worldly. sent21: the enologist is a go if there exists something such that that it is isthmian and it is a stipend does not hold. sent22: the cerivastatin caucuses toff.
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is isthmian and is a stipend is not true.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the enologist is a kind of a go.; sent9 -> int3: if the enologist goes then that it is pineal hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the enologist is pineal.; int4 -> int5: the enologist is pineal or does not wet or both.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the cerivastatin abuses.; sent13 -> int7: the cerivastatin is worldly.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the cerivastatin is an abuse and it is worldly.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that the fact that it is an abuse but not unworldly is not false.; int9 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
something is a fluorine that admeasures sacerdotalism.
sent1 -> int10: that the enologist is non-pineal if the enologist is both not wet and not an abuse is true.; sent6 & sent12 -> int11: the enologist admeasures sacerdotalism.;
$hypothesis$ = the strapless is not autoplastic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not wet is not an abuse then it is not pineal. sent2: if that something is wet but it is not an abuse does not hold then it is not pineal. sent3: that the investment is both isthmian and a stipend is not right. sent4: either the investment abuses or it is isthmian or both. sent5: if there is something such that it is not isthmian then the enologist does go. sent6: if the cerivastatin does not admeasure sacerdotalism the enologist does admeasure sacerdotalism. sent7: the cerivastatin is a kind of a bonbon and it rises if something is a kind of a baron. sent8: if the fact that the cerivastatin is a kind of a bonbon is not false then the enologist caucuses toff. sent9: if something does go that it is pineal is correct. sent10: there is something such that it is a kind of a baron. sent11: if the strapless is not pineal then it is autoplastic and a go. sent12: the cerivastatin does not admeasure sacerdotalism. sent13: the cerivastatin is worldly and it does caucus toff. sent14: the strapless is not worldly if the enologist caucuses toff and is a Sanchez. sent15: there is something such that it is worldly. sent16: the cerivastatin abuses if the enologist is pineal and/or it is not wet. sent17: the cerivastatin is a stipend that does caucus toff. sent18: there exists something such that it abuses. sent19: the strapless is not autoplastic if something that is an abuse is worldly. sent20: the fact that something does wet and is not an abuse is not correct if it is not worldly. sent21: the enologist is a go if there exists something such that that it is isthmian and it is a stipend does not hold. sent22: the cerivastatin caucuses toff. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is isthmian and is a stipend is not true.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the enologist is a kind of a go.; sent9 -> int3: if the enologist goes then that it is pineal hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the enologist is pineal.; int4 -> int5: the enologist is pineal or does not wet or both.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the cerivastatin abuses.; sent13 -> int7: the cerivastatin is worldly.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the cerivastatin is an abuse and it is worldly.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that the fact that it is an abuse but not unworldly is not false.; int9 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__