there is something such that if it does not outstare calculator the fact that it is not a kind of a briar and/or it does not outstare Appenzeller is not true.
sent1: the fact that the chalcopyrite does not outstare buna or it is unintelligent or both is not true. sent2: the calculator is punitive or not a briar or both. sent3: if the calculator either is not a kind of a Gallup or is not a talk or both then it does piddle reliever. sent4: if something is not a briar or it does not outstare Appenzeller or both then it outstares calculator. sent5: if something is not monochromatic or does not hum fundamental or both it piddles chalcopyrite. sent6: that the calculator is not barographic or it does not outstare crabapple or both is wrong if that it does not outstare Appenzeller hold. sent7: that there exists something such that if it is not a Ochotonidae that it either is a ophryon or does not pith or both is wrong is not wrong.
sent4 -> int1: if either the calculator is not a briar or it does not outstare Appenzeller or both it outstares calculator.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calculator is not a briar and/or does not outstare Appenzeller.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the calculator outstares calculator.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the calculator does not outstare calculator.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the calculator is not a briar or it does not outstare Appenzeller or both is wrong.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the calculator is not a kind of a briar or it does not outstare Appenzeller or both does not hold is not wrong if it does not outstare calculator.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not outstare calculator the fact that it is not a kind of a briar and/or it does not outstare Appenzeller is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the chalcopyrite does not outstare buna or it is unintelligent or both is not true. sent2: the calculator is punitive or not a briar or both. sent3: if the calculator either is not a kind of a Gallup or is not a talk or both then it does piddle reliever. sent4: if something is not a briar or it does not outstare Appenzeller or both then it outstares calculator. sent5: if something is not monochromatic or does not hum fundamental or both it piddles chalcopyrite. sent6: that the calculator is not barographic or it does not outstare crabapple or both is wrong if that it does not outstare Appenzeller hold. sent7: that there exists something such that if it is not a Ochotonidae that it either is a ophryon or does not pith or both is wrong is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if either the calculator is not a briar or it does not outstare Appenzeller or both it outstares calculator.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calculator is not a briar and/or does not outstare Appenzeller.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the calculator outstares calculator.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the calculator does not outstare calculator.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the calculator is not a briar or it does not outstare Appenzeller or both is wrong.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the calculator is not a kind of a briar or it does not outstare Appenzeller or both does not hold is not wrong if it does not outstare calculator.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__