the cue does fragment curio.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not monatomic and piddles is not wrong is wrong. sent2: that the servitor is not bacillar if there is something such that the fact that it is not monatomic and it piddles is not right is not false. sent3: the cue does not fragment curio if the servitor is not bacillar and does clank Kabul. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Malaysia and/or it is not a EXEC is false the alidade is bacillar. sent5: that something does not sputter cue or it is not a Malaysia or both does not hold if it is a EXEC. sent6: there exists something such that that it does fragment curio and it is a bondwoman does not hold. sent7: there is something such that that it does fragment alidade and is malign is not true. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a Malaysia then the servitor is a girth. sent9: there is something such that the fact that that it either is not a Malaysia or does not fragment curio or both hold does not hold. sent10: something is a EXEC if it is a bondwoman. sent11: if the alidade is malign then it is a kind of a tipper. sent12: the servitor does clank Kabul if there exists something such that the fact that either it does not sputter cue or it is not a kind of a Malaysia or both is not right. sent13: there exists something such that that either it is not a chalk or it does convoy anarthria or both is false. sent14: the alidade is a bondwoman if there exists something such that that it does fragment alidade and it is malign is wrong.
sent7 & sent14 -> int1: the alidade is a kind of a bondwoman.; sent10 -> int2: if the alidade is a kind of a bondwoman it is a kind of a EXEC.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alidade is a EXEC.; sent5 -> int4: if the alidade is a kind of a EXEC that it does not sputter cue or it is not Malaysia or both does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the alidade does not sputter cue and/or it is not Malaysia does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it does not sputter cue or it is not a Malaysia or both does not hold.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the servitor does clank Kabul.; sent1 & sent2 -> int8: that the servitor is not bacillar hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the servitor is non-bacillar thing that clanks Kabul.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the cue does fragment curio. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not monatomic and piddles is not wrong is wrong. sent2: that the servitor is not bacillar if there is something such that the fact that it is not monatomic and it piddles is not right is not false. sent3: the cue does not fragment curio if the servitor is not bacillar and does clank Kabul. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Malaysia and/or it is not a EXEC is false the alidade is bacillar. sent5: that something does not sputter cue or it is not a Malaysia or both does not hold if it is a EXEC. sent6: there exists something such that that it does fragment curio and it is a bondwoman does not hold. sent7: there is something such that that it does fragment alidade and is malign is not true. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a Malaysia then the servitor is a girth. sent9: there is something such that the fact that that it either is not a Malaysia or does not fragment curio or both hold does not hold. sent10: something is a EXEC if it is a bondwoman. sent11: if the alidade is malign then it is a kind of a tipper. sent12: the servitor does clank Kabul if there exists something such that the fact that either it does not sputter cue or it is not a kind of a Malaysia or both is not right. sent13: there exists something such that that either it is not a chalk or it does convoy anarthria or both is false. sent14: the alidade is a bondwoman if there exists something such that that it does fragment alidade and it is malign is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent14 -> int1: the alidade is a kind of a bondwoman.; sent10 -> int2: if the alidade is a kind of a bondwoman it is a kind of a EXEC.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alidade is a EXEC.; sent5 -> int4: if the alidade is a kind of a EXEC that it does not sputter cue or it is not Malaysia or both does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the alidade does not sputter cue and/or it is not Malaysia does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it does not sputter cue or it is not a Malaysia or both does not hold.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the servitor does clank Kabul.; sent1 & sent2 -> int8: that the servitor is not bacillar hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the servitor is non-bacillar thing that clanks Kabul.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__