the dogcart is not a pistol.
sent1: the florilegium is not a Liszt if the analyzer does not chance riskiness but it chances Pharomacrus. sent2: that the vaccinee is a romanticism and is a Liszt does not hold. sent3: if the analyzer does not chance Pharomacrus and is not a kind of a Liszt the vaccinee does not chance riskiness. sent4: that the florilegium is not a Liszt is not false if the analyzer does not chance riskiness and it does not chance Pharomacrus. sent5: if the gusher is not a pistol and does not chance Dufy the dogcart is not a pistol. sent6: if the fact that the gusher does not chance Dufy and is a Liszt is not correct that the analyzer is not a romanticism is true. sent7: if the gusher chances Dufy and is not a pistol then the dogcart is not a pistol. sent8: if the gusher does chance Dufy then the analyzer does not chance riskiness and does not chance Pharomacrus. sent9: the analyzer does not chance Pharomacrus. sent10: that the gusher is not a Liszt is not false if the fact that the analyzer is not a kind of a romanticism and is a Liszt is false. sent11: that the florilegium does chance Dufy is not false if the gusher is a kind of a Liszt. sent12: that the vaccinee is not a kind of a romanticism but it is a kind of a Liszt is wrong if the florilegium is not a kind of a Liszt. sent13: if the analyzer is not a kind of a Liszt the fact that the florilegium does not chance riskiness but it is a kind of a Liszt is wrong. sent14: the dogcart is a Liszt. sent15: The Dufy does chance gusher. sent16: something that is a Liszt does chance Dufy. sent17: if the fact that the florilegium is a Liszt is wrong the fact that the vaccinee is both a romanticism and a Liszt is incorrect. sent18: if the dogcart is a romanticism the vaccinee is rehabilitative. sent19: the florilegium is a kind of a pistol. sent20: the gusher does chance Dufy. sent21: if the fact that the vaccinee is not a romanticism and is a Liszt is wrong then the dogcart is rehabilitative. sent22: something is a pistol if it is rehabilitative.
sent8 & sent20 -> int1: the analyzer does not chance riskiness and does not chance Pharomacrus.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the florilegium is not a Liszt.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the vaccinee is not a romanticism but it is a kind of a Liszt is false.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the dogcart is rehabilitative.; sent22 -> int5: if the dogcart is rehabilitative it is a pistol.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the dogcart is not a pistol.
$hypothesis$ = the dogcart is not a pistol. ; $context$ = sent1: the florilegium is not a Liszt if the analyzer does not chance riskiness but it chances Pharomacrus. sent2: that the vaccinee is a romanticism and is a Liszt does not hold. sent3: if the analyzer does not chance Pharomacrus and is not a kind of a Liszt the vaccinee does not chance riskiness. sent4: that the florilegium is not a Liszt is not false if the analyzer does not chance riskiness and it does not chance Pharomacrus. sent5: if the gusher is not a pistol and does not chance Dufy the dogcart is not a pistol. sent6: if the fact that the gusher does not chance Dufy and is a Liszt is not correct that the analyzer is not a romanticism is true. sent7: if the gusher chances Dufy and is not a pistol then the dogcart is not a pistol. sent8: if the gusher does chance Dufy then the analyzer does not chance riskiness and does not chance Pharomacrus. sent9: the analyzer does not chance Pharomacrus. sent10: that the gusher is not a Liszt is not false if the fact that the analyzer is not a kind of a romanticism and is a Liszt is false. sent11: that the florilegium does chance Dufy is not false if the gusher is a kind of a Liszt. sent12: that the vaccinee is not a kind of a romanticism but it is a kind of a Liszt is wrong if the florilegium is not a kind of a Liszt. sent13: if the analyzer is not a kind of a Liszt the fact that the florilegium does not chance riskiness but it is a kind of a Liszt is wrong. sent14: the dogcart is a Liszt. sent15: The Dufy does chance gusher. sent16: something that is a Liszt does chance Dufy. sent17: if the fact that the florilegium is a Liszt is wrong the fact that the vaccinee is both a romanticism and a Liszt is incorrect. sent18: if the dogcart is a romanticism the vaccinee is rehabilitative. sent19: the florilegium is a kind of a pistol. sent20: the gusher does chance Dufy. sent21: if the fact that the vaccinee is not a romanticism and is a Liszt is wrong then the dogcart is rehabilitative. sent22: something is a pistol if it is rehabilitative. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent20 -> int1: the analyzer does not chance riskiness and does not chance Pharomacrus.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the florilegium is not a Liszt.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the vaccinee is not a romanticism but it is a kind of a Liszt is false.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the dogcart is rehabilitative.; sent22 -> int5: if the dogcart is rehabilitative it is a pistol.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__