that if the bushman does intussuscept then that the monoamine does not embrown filled and is anecdotal is false does not hold.
sent1: the bushman is a nitrazepam. sent2: the monoamine does not embrown filled but it is a prospectus. sent3: the bushman embrowns filled. sent4: if the monoamine is anecdotal and it is avionic it is not a inclinometer. sent5: the fact that the monoamine is anecdotal thing that is a Koran does not hold. sent6: if the monoamine is a Koran then that that the bushman does embrown filled and is anecdotal hold does not hold. sent7: the power is anecdotal. sent8: if something is a Koran and it does intussuscept then it is not anecdotal. sent9: the garbageman does embrown filled. sent10: the monoamine does guesstimate and is a actinometer. sent11: the brooklet does not embrown filled. sent12: if the monoamine does not intussuscept then the bushman is non-anecdotal thing that intussuscept. sent13: the fact that the bushman is a Koran is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the monoamine is a Koran and it does embrown filled is not right if the bushman is anecdotal. sent15: the bushman does not embrown filled but it is not non-anecdotal if the monoamine is a Koran. sent16: the monoamine is anecdotal and intussuscepts. sent17: if the bushman intussuscepts then the monoamine is not a Koran but it is anecdotal. sent18: the Capetian is not anecdotal but it is a Freudian. sent19: the fact that the monoamine is a kind of a Koran and it embrowns filled does not hold. sent20: if the bushman is not anecdotal that the monoamine does not embrown filled but it is anecdotal does not hold. sent21: the fact that the monoamine does embrown filled and is anecdotal is false if the bushman is not anecdotal. sent22: that the monoamine embrowns filled and it is anecdotal is not right. sent23: the monoamine does not intussuscept if it is anecdotal and it does embrown filled.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bushman intussuscepts.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the bushman is a Koran and intussuscepts.; sent8 -> int2: if the bushman is a kind of a Koran that does intussuscept it is not anecdotal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bushman is not anecdotal.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: that the monoamine does not embrown filled and is anecdotal is wrong.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the bushman does intussuscept then that the monoamine does not embrown filled and is anecdotal is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the bushman is a nitrazepam. sent2: the monoamine does not embrown filled but it is a prospectus. sent3: the bushman embrowns filled. sent4: if the monoamine is anecdotal and it is avionic it is not a inclinometer. sent5: the fact that the monoamine is anecdotal thing that is a Koran does not hold. sent6: if the monoamine is a Koran then that that the bushman does embrown filled and is anecdotal hold does not hold. sent7: the power is anecdotal. sent8: if something is a Koran and it does intussuscept then it is not anecdotal. sent9: the garbageman does embrown filled. sent10: the monoamine does guesstimate and is a actinometer. sent11: the brooklet does not embrown filled. sent12: if the monoamine does not intussuscept then the bushman is non-anecdotal thing that intussuscept. sent13: the fact that the bushman is a Koran is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the monoamine is a Koran and it does embrown filled is not right if the bushman is anecdotal. sent15: the bushman does not embrown filled but it is not non-anecdotal if the monoamine is a Koran. sent16: the monoamine is anecdotal and intussuscepts. sent17: if the bushman intussuscepts then the monoamine is not a Koran but it is anecdotal. sent18: the Capetian is not anecdotal but it is a Freudian. sent19: the fact that the monoamine is a kind of a Koran and it embrowns filled does not hold. sent20: if the bushman is not anecdotal that the monoamine does not embrown filled but it is anecdotal does not hold. sent21: the fact that the monoamine does embrown filled and is anecdotal is false if the bushman is not anecdotal. sent22: that the monoamine embrowns filled and it is anecdotal is not right. sent23: the monoamine does not intussuscept if it is anecdotal and it does embrown filled. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bushman intussuscepts.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the bushman is a Koran and intussuscepts.; sent8 -> int2: if the bushman is a kind of a Koran that does intussuscept it is not anecdotal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bushman is not anecdotal.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: that the monoamine does not embrown filled and is anecdotal is wrong.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__