if the occupancy happens the non-nonreticulateness and the purge occurs.
sent1: the sweeping occurs if the sickening occurs. sent2: that the sweeping occurs and the occupancy occurs causes the non-nonreticulateness. sent3: the diamagneticness does not occur. sent4: not the employment but the blinding catafalque happens. sent5: the purging occurs. sent6: if the economicness happens not the blinding Kuomintang but the session occurs. sent7: that the purge does not occur if the fact that not the fox-trot but the precipitation occurs does not hold is not incorrect. sent8: the leaning thimblerig occurs and the accoutering orator happens. sent9: not the valuable but the symptomaticness occurs. sent10: the pipeline happens and the accoutering external happens. sent11: the leaning addle-head occurs. sent12: the schottische happens. sent13: the alliaceousness does not occur if the selflessness occurs and the slide occurs. sent14: that not the fox-trot but the precipitation occurs is not right if the seigneury happens. sent15: the immolation occurs. sent16: the sickening happens. sent17: if the occupancy does not occur then the fact that the sweeping but not the sickening happens is not correct. sent18: the delivering occurs. sent19: if the integralness does not occur then the losslessness and the seigneury happens. sent20: the bicameralness happens. sent21: if that the sweeping occurs and the sickening does not occur does not hold then the accoutering wheatworm occurs. sent22: the gymnasticsness occurs.
sent1 & sent16 -> int1: the sweeping occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the occupancy occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sweeping and the occupancy happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the nonreticulateness does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the non-nonreticulateness and the purging happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the accoutering wheatworm occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the occupancy happens the non-nonreticulateness and the purge occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the sweeping occurs if the sickening occurs. sent2: that the sweeping occurs and the occupancy occurs causes the non-nonreticulateness. sent3: the diamagneticness does not occur. sent4: not the employment but the blinding catafalque happens. sent5: the purging occurs. sent6: if the economicness happens not the blinding Kuomintang but the session occurs. sent7: that the purge does not occur if the fact that not the fox-trot but the precipitation occurs does not hold is not incorrect. sent8: the leaning thimblerig occurs and the accoutering orator happens. sent9: not the valuable but the symptomaticness occurs. sent10: the pipeline happens and the accoutering external happens. sent11: the leaning addle-head occurs. sent12: the schottische happens. sent13: the alliaceousness does not occur if the selflessness occurs and the slide occurs. sent14: that not the fox-trot but the precipitation occurs is not right if the seigneury happens. sent15: the immolation occurs. sent16: the sickening happens. sent17: if the occupancy does not occur then the fact that the sweeping but not the sickening happens is not correct. sent18: the delivering occurs. sent19: if the integralness does not occur then the losslessness and the seigneury happens. sent20: the bicameralness happens. sent21: if that the sweeping occurs and the sickening does not occur does not hold then the accoutering wheatworm occurs. sent22: the gymnasticsness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent16 -> int1: the sweeping occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the occupancy occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sweeping and the occupancy happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the nonreticulateness does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the non-nonreticulateness and the purging happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__