that the wool is not a downcast but catoptric does not hold.
sent1: something does not uncork Ceratotherium if the fact that it uncork Ceratotherium and it is not a microfilm is not right. sent2: something uncorks discernability and/or is not a handsomeness. sent3: the PIN is a downcast and it narrates upstroke if there exists something such that it is not slippery. sent4: that something uncorks Ceratotherium but it is not a microfilm does not hold if it does not uncork Americanism. sent5: if there is something such that it is not catoptric the notion is not a downcast. sent6: if the swelling does not uncork Americanism the notion is not a microfilm. sent7: if something is slippery but it is non-tibial then that it does not uncork Americanism is true. sent8: that either the notion is not a microfilm or it is tibial or both is not incorrect. sent9: the swelling does narrate upstroke if the notion is not a kind of a downcast. sent10: if something is not slippery then the notion is a downcast that is catoptric. sent11: there is something such that that it is slippery hold. sent12: there is something such that that it is slippery and does narrate upstroke does not hold. sent13: if something does not uncork daystar then that it is unpreventable and it uncorks fibril is not right. sent14: if the swelling does narrate upstroke then the blackbody is both slippery and not tibial. sent15: the tail is a downcast. sent16: the swelling does not uncork Americanism if something does uncork discernability or is not a handsomeness or both. sent17: something is not catoptric if that it is unpreventable and it does uncork fibril is not correct. sent18: the swelling does not uncork Americanism if there is something such that it is not a handsomeness. sent19: if the notion is non-tibial then it is nonslippery. sent20: if something is not tibial that it is not slippery hold. sent21: the notion does narrate upstroke and it is a microfilm if there is something such that that it is not catoptric is not incorrect. sent22: that that the notion is not a downcast but it is tibial does not hold is not wrong. sent23: if something either is not slippery or is not a downcast or both it does not narrate upstroke. sent24: there exists something such that either it does uncork discernability or it is a kind of a handsomeness or both. sent25: if the PIN is a kind of a downcast then that the wool is not a downcast and is catoptric does not hold.
sent2 & sent16 -> int1: the swelling does not uncork Americanism.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the notion is not a kind of a microfilm.; int2 -> int3: the notion is not a kind of a microfilm or it is not tibial or both.;
the wool is both not a downcast and catoptric.
$hypothesis$ = that the wool is not a downcast but catoptric does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not uncork Ceratotherium if the fact that it uncork Ceratotherium and it is not a microfilm is not right. sent2: something uncorks discernability and/or is not a handsomeness. sent3: the PIN is a downcast and it narrates upstroke if there exists something such that it is not slippery. sent4: that something uncorks Ceratotherium but it is not a microfilm does not hold if it does not uncork Americanism. sent5: if there is something such that it is not catoptric the notion is not a downcast. sent6: if the swelling does not uncork Americanism the notion is not a microfilm. sent7: if something is slippery but it is non-tibial then that it does not uncork Americanism is true. sent8: that either the notion is not a microfilm or it is tibial or both is not incorrect. sent9: the swelling does narrate upstroke if the notion is not a kind of a downcast. sent10: if something is not slippery then the notion is a downcast that is catoptric. sent11: there is something such that that it is slippery hold. sent12: there is something such that that it is slippery and does narrate upstroke does not hold. sent13: if something does not uncork daystar then that it is unpreventable and it uncorks fibril is not right. sent14: if the swelling does narrate upstroke then the blackbody is both slippery and not tibial. sent15: the tail is a downcast. sent16: the swelling does not uncork Americanism if something does uncork discernability or is not a handsomeness or both. sent17: something is not catoptric if that it is unpreventable and it does uncork fibril is not correct. sent18: the swelling does not uncork Americanism if there is something such that it is not a handsomeness. sent19: if the notion is non-tibial then it is nonslippery. sent20: if something is not tibial that it is not slippery hold. sent21: the notion does narrate upstroke and it is a microfilm if there is something such that that it is not catoptric is not incorrect. sent22: that that the notion is not a downcast but it is tibial does not hold is not wrong. sent23: if something either is not slippery or is not a downcast or both it does not narrate upstroke. sent24: there exists something such that either it does uncork discernability or it is a kind of a handsomeness or both. sent25: if the PIN is a kind of a downcast then that the wool is not a downcast and is catoptric does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent16 -> int1: the swelling does not uncork Americanism.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the notion is not a kind of a microfilm.; int2 -> int3: the notion is not a kind of a microfilm or it is not tibial or both.; __UNKNOWN__