the antinomian is Tantric but it is not an aloe.
sent1: the antinomian is not a kind of an aloe. sent2: the fact that the bob is gymnospermous and does not ruckle is not correct. sent3: there is something such that that it is not a ampulla but effortless is incorrect. sent4: the claustrophobe is apocrine. sent5: if something is not a ampulla and it is not effortless it is not gymnospermous. sent6: the bob is an aloe and is not effortless. sent7: the celeriac does not moo if there exists something such that it is effortless. sent8: if the claustrophobe does ruckle the antinomian is Tantric. sent9: the fact that the celeriac ruckles and does not moo is not true. sent10: if that that the claustrophobe is a kind of asynergic thing that does not ruckle is false is not false the antinomian is Tantric. sent11: the bob is gymnospermous. sent12: that the claustrophobe is not non-asynergic but it does not ruckle is not right if the celeriac does not moo.
sent5 -> int1: the bob is not gymnospermous if it is not a ampulla and not effortless.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bob is not a ampulla and not effortless.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bob is not gymnospermous.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the bob is both not a ampulla and not effortless is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a ampulla and not effortless is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the antinomian is Tantric but it is not an aloe. ; $context$ = sent1: the antinomian is not a kind of an aloe. sent2: the fact that the bob is gymnospermous and does not ruckle is not correct. sent3: there is something such that that it is not a ampulla but effortless is incorrect. sent4: the claustrophobe is apocrine. sent5: if something is not a ampulla and it is not effortless it is not gymnospermous. sent6: the bob is an aloe and is not effortless. sent7: the celeriac does not moo if there exists something such that it is effortless. sent8: if the claustrophobe does ruckle the antinomian is Tantric. sent9: the fact that the celeriac ruckles and does not moo is not true. sent10: if that that the claustrophobe is a kind of asynergic thing that does not ruckle is false is not false the antinomian is Tantric. sent11: the bob is gymnospermous. sent12: that the claustrophobe is not non-asynergic but it does not ruckle is not right if the celeriac does not moo. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the bob is not gymnospermous if it is not a ampulla and not effortless.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bob is not a ampulla and not effortless.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bob is not gymnospermous.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the bob is both not a ampulla and not effortless is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a ampulla and not effortless is false.; __UNKNOWN__