that the manifest occurs but the cytologicalness does not occur is not true.
sent1: the fact that both the manifest and the non-cytologicalness happens does not hold if the fracturing stratocracy does not occur. sent2: the cluttering does not occur. sent3: that both the manifesting and the cytologicalness occurs is not correct. sent4: the clinch occurs if the injustice happens. sent5: if the satisfactoriness occurs the refacing ling happens. sent6: that the rheologicness occurs and the extirpation happens is not correct. sent7: the fact that the refacing betrayal happens and the fracturing stratocracy happens is incorrect if the refacing ling does not occur. sent8: that both the eugenicsness and the fracturing stratocracy happens prevents the refacing betrayal. sent9: both the shlepping and the scrimping occurs. sent10: the inevitable happens and the Aramaicness does not occur. sent11: the flopping happens. sent12: the flopping and the mercy occurs. sent13: the violableness does not occur. sent14: that the ergoticness occurs is true. sent15: both the twenty-one and the satisfactoriness occurs. sent16: that both the unangriness and the triple happens is incorrect. sent17: the Aeschyleanness does not occur. sent18: the fixture does not occur. sent19: the violableness occurs if the refacing ling occurs but the refacing betrayal does not occur. sent20: if the eugenicsness does not occur both the manifesting and the non-cytologicalness happens. sent21: that both the specifying Gironde and the non-ergonomicness occurs prevents the non-labyrinthineness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fracturing stratocracy occurs hold.; sent15 -> int1: the satisfactoriness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the refacing ling happens.;
the manifest but not the cytologicalness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the manifest occurs but the cytologicalness does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the manifest and the non-cytologicalness happens does not hold if the fracturing stratocracy does not occur. sent2: the cluttering does not occur. sent3: that both the manifesting and the cytologicalness occurs is not correct. sent4: the clinch occurs if the injustice happens. sent5: if the satisfactoriness occurs the refacing ling happens. sent6: that the rheologicness occurs and the extirpation happens is not correct. sent7: the fact that the refacing betrayal happens and the fracturing stratocracy happens is incorrect if the refacing ling does not occur. sent8: that both the eugenicsness and the fracturing stratocracy happens prevents the refacing betrayal. sent9: both the shlepping and the scrimping occurs. sent10: the inevitable happens and the Aramaicness does not occur. sent11: the flopping happens. sent12: the flopping and the mercy occurs. sent13: the violableness does not occur. sent14: that the ergoticness occurs is true. sent15: both the twenty-one and the satisfactoriness occurs. sent16: that both the unangriness and the triple happens is incorrect. sent17: the Aeschyleanness does not occur. sent18: the fixture does not occur. sent19: the violableness occurs if the refacing ling occurs but the refacing betrayal does not occur. sent20: if the eugenicsness does not occur both the manifesting and the non-cytologicalness happens. sent21: that both the specifying Gironde and the non-ergonomicness occurs prevents the non-labyrinthineness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fracturing stratocracy occurs hold.; sent15 -> int1: the satisfactoriness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the refacing ling happens.; __UNKNOWN__