the coxcomb platitudinizes.
sent1: the coxcomb platitudinizes if the fact that the laager manifolds is correct. sent2: if the fact that the hop does not platitudinize and is not unexpansive does not hold then the coxcomb is a manifold. sent3: the slit is geodetic if the fact that the laager is not a manifold and is not a kind of a Koasati does not hold. sent4: the slit is geodetic if the hop is not a Koasati. sent5: something is a Koasati and/or is geodetic. sent6: that the laager is not a kind of a manifold and is not penumbral is not true if the iris does not manifold. sent7: something is a kind of a comity. sent8: the laager is a kind of a Thomism. sent9: the coxcomb platitudinizes if that the laager is not a manifold and not penumbral does not hold. sent10: if the hop is not penumbral then the fact that the laager is penumbral and is not a Koasati does not hold. sent11: that the slit is a kind of non-penumbral thing that is not geodetic is false. sent12: the slit is geodetic if that the hop is a Koasati but it is not unexpansive is not correct. sent13: if something does wave Castanospermum the iris does not manifold. sent14: if something is geodetic and/or it is unexpansive the slit does not manifold. sent15: the fact that the laager is a manifold but it is not penumbral is not correct if the iris does not manifold. sent16: if there exists something such that it is not non-geodetic and/or it waves Castanospermum then the fact that the iris is not a manifold is not wrong. sent17: the slit is not unexpansive if something either is penumbral or is geodetic or both. sent18: that the laager does manifold and is not penumbral is not correct. sent19: the slit is chirpy. sent20: the slit is penumbral. sent21: the fact that the slit is a cephalothin and is not a manifold is false. sent22: there exists something such that it accelerates groupthink. sent23: if something accelerates groupthink then that the hop is a Koasati but it is not unexpansive does not hold. sent24: something platitudinizes.
sent22 & sent23 -> int1: the fact that the hop is a Koasati but it is not unexpansive does not hold.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the slit is geodetic.; int2 -> int3: the slit is geodetic or it does wave Castanospermum or both.; int3 -> int4: something is geodetic or it waves Castanospermum or both.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the iris is not a kind of a manifold.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the laager is not a kind of a manifold and it is not penumbral does not hold.; sent9 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the coxcomb platitudinizes. ; $context$ = sent1: the coxcomb platitudinizes if the fact that the laager manifolds is correct. sent2: if the fact that the hop does not platitudinize and is not unexpansive does not hold then the coxcomb is a manifold. sent3: the slit is geodetic if the fact that the laager is not a manifold and is not a kind of a Koasati does not hold. sent4: the slit is geodetic if the hop is not a Koasati. sent5: something is a Koasati and/or is geodetic. sent6: that the laager is not a kind of a manifold and is not penumbral is not true if the iris does not manifold. sent7: something is a kind of a comity. sent8: the laager is a kind of a Thomism. sent9: the coxcomb platitudinizes if that the laager is not a manifold and not penumbral does not hold. sent10: if the hop is not penumbral then the fact that the laager is penumbral and is not a Koasati does not hold. sent11: that the slit is a kind of non-penumbral thing that is not geodetic is false. sent12: the slit is geodetic if that the hop is a Koasati but it is not unexpansive is not correct. sent13: if something does wave Castanospermum the iris does not manifold. sent14: if something is geodetic and/or it is unexpansive the slit does not manifold. sent15: the fact that the laager is a manifold but it is not penumbral is not correct if the iris does not manifold. sent16: if there exists something such that it is not non-geodetic and/or it waves Castanospermum then the fact that the iris is not a manifold is not wrong. sent17: the slit is not unexpansive if something either is penumbral or is geodetic or both. sent18: that the laager does manifold and is not penumbral is not correct. sent19: the slit is chirpy. sent20: the slit is penumbral. sent21: the fact that the slit is a cephalothin and is not a manifold is false. sent22: there exists something such that it accelerates groupthink. sent23: if something accelerates groupthink then that the hop is a Koasati but it is not unexpansive does not hold. sent24: something platitudinizes. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent23 -> int1: the fact that the hop is a Koasati but it is not unexpansive does not hold.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the slit is geodetic.; int2 -> int3: the slit is geodetic or it does wave Castanospermum or both.; int3 -> int4: something is geodetic or it waves Castanospermum or both.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the iris is not a kind of a manifold.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the laager is not a kind of a manifold and it is not penumbral does not hold.; sent9 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__