there exists something such that if it does not approbate Galician then it is not Rembrandtesque.
sent1: if the closure does not approbate Galician then it is Rembrandtesque. sent2: something that is not fatalist does not approbate Galician. sent3: the superhet is not a pink if that it is not a kind of a Jong is not false. sent4: if the closure does approbate Galician then it is not Rembrandtesque. sent5: there is something such that if it does not approbate Galician it is Rembrandtesque. sent6: something is not lexicographic if it is not a kind of a madnep. sent7: there is something such that if it does not approbate Callorhinus it is not a substitute. sent8: if the episome is not inelastic it does not sequence. sent9: if the closure does not cloy Dipodidae then it does not approbate Galician. sent10: there is something such that if it does not underquote lagomorph it is not a blitz. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is not Rousseauan is not wrong it is not Nordic. sent12: there exists something such that if it is non-bregmatic then that it is not Rousseauan is true. sent13: the closure is not Yeatsian if it is not Rembrandtesque. sent14: the vertebrate does not approbate Galician if it is not a kind of a upsetter. sent15: the closure is not Rembrandtesque if it is not a stomp. sent16: there is something such that if it approbates Galician then that it is not Rembrandtesque hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it does not depose polish it is not dermatologic. sent18: if something is not particularistic then it is not Rembrandtesque. sent19: if that the closure does not approbate Galician is not false it is not Rembrandtesque. sent20: there is something such that if the fact that it does not uncoil is not false then it is not additive. sent21: if the closure is not a sequence then it is not a kind of a vancomycin.
sent19 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a madnep then it is not lexicographic.
sent6 -> int1: the testator is non-lexicographic if the fact that it is not a madnep is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not approbate Galician then it is not Rembrandtesque. ; $context$ = sent1: if the closure does not approbate Galician then it is Rembrandtesque. sent2: something that is not fatalist does not approbate Galician. sent3: the superhet is not a pink if that it is not a kind of a Jong is not false. sent4: if the closure does approbate Galician then it is not Rembrandtesque. sent5: there is something such that if it does not approbate Galician it is Rembrandtesque. sent6: something is not lexicographic if it is not a kind of a madnep. sent7: there is something such that if it does not approbate Callorhinus it is not a substitute. sent8: if the episome is not inelastic it does not sequence. sent9: if the closure does not cloy Dipodidae then it does not approbate Galician. sent10: there is something such that if it does not underquote lagomorph it is not a blitz. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is not Rousseauan is not wrong it is not Nordic. sent12: there exists something such that if it is non-bregmatic then that it is not Rousseauan is true. sent13: the closure is not Yeatsian if it is not Rembrandtesque. sent14: the vertebrate does not approbate Galician if it is not a kind of a upsetter. sent15: the closure is not Rembrandtesque if it is not a stomp. sent16: there is something such that if it approbates Galician then that it is not Rembrandtesque hold. sent17: there exists something such that if it does not depose polish it is not dermatologic. sent18: if something is not particularistic then it is not Rembrandtesque. sent19: if that the closure does not approbate Galician is not false it is not Rembrandtesque. sent20: there is something such that if the fact that it does not uncoil is not false then it is not additive. sent21: if the closure is not a sequence then it is not a kind of a vancomycin. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__