there is something such that if that it either is not life-support or squires Chen or both is not right then it is not a burgrass.
sent1: the magnification is not a burgrass if that it is not life-support and/or does squire Chen is wrong. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not abolitionary or it is a kind of a Marche or both does not hold then it is not soleless. sent3: if the fact that the ferrocerium either does not squire Chen or is not non-calceolate or both is incorrect it does not inspire. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it either is not unresponsive or is a FSB or both is true is not correct then it is not a kind of a Caproidae. sent5: the fact that if that the magnification does not scorch magnification and/or it squires Forth does not hold then the magnification does not squire Chen hold. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it is life-support or it does squire Chen or both is right is wrong then it is not a burgrass. sent7: the magnification is not life-support if that the fact that either it does not kennel placer or it eyes or both hold is false. sent8: the magnification is not a kind of a burgrass if that it does not scorch GPO and/or is soleless does not hold. sent9: the magnification is not a burgrass if the fact that it is life-support or it does squire Chen or both is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is not a Myliobatidae and/or it is favorable is not correct then it is not a kind of a feeding. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not life-support or it does squire Chen or both does not hold it is a kind of a burgrass. sent12: if that something is not a communicant and/or it is ectomorphic is false it does not squire Chen. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is either not a bloom or oral or both is incorrect the fact that it does not scorch magnification hold. sent14: if the fact that that the magnification is not life-support and/or it squires Chen is right is not right it is a burgrass. sent15: that there is something such that if it is not life-support or does squire Chen or both then it is not a burgrass hold. sent16: there is something such that if that it is not a dermatologist and/or it is meiotic is incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of a X-ray hold. sent17: there is something such that if the fact that either it is not calcifugous or it does scorch ferrocerium or both is wrong it is not a Jensen. sent18: the magnification is not a burgrass if it is not life-support or it does squire Chen or both. sent19: if the fact that the placer does not kennel tailgate and/or is a kind of a contrivance is not right it is not tubal.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
if that the magnification is not a communicant and/or it is ectomorphic is incorrect it does not squire Chen.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it either is not life-support or squires Chen or both is not right then it is not a burgrass. ; $context$ = sent1: the magnification is not a burgrass if that it is not life-support and/or does squire Chen is wrong. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not abolitionary or it is a kind of a Marche or both does not hold then it is not soleless. sent3: if the fact that the ferrocerium either does not squire Chen or is not non-calceolate or both is incorrect it does not inspire. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it either is not unresponsive or is a FSB or both is true is not correct then it is not a kind of a Caproidae. sent5: the fact that if that the magnification does not scorch magnification and/or it squires Forth does not hold then the magnification does not squire Chen hold. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that the fact that it is life-support or it does squire Chen or both is right is wrong then it is not a burgrass. sent7: the magnification is not life-support if that the fact that either it does not kennel placer or it eyes or both hold is false. sent8: the magnification is not a kind of a burgrass if that it does not scorch GPO and/or is soleless does not hold. sent9: the magnification is not a burgrass if the fact that it is life-support or it does squire Chen or both is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is not a Myliobatidae and/or it is favorable is not correct then it is not a kind of a feeding. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not life-support or it does squire Chen or both does not hold it is a kind of a burgrass. sent12: if that something is not a communicant and/or it is ectomorphic is false it does not squire Chen. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is either not a bloom or oral or both is incorrect the fact that it does not scorch magnification hold. sent14: if the fact that that the magnification is not life-support and/or it squires Chen is right is not right it is a burgrass. sent15: that there is something such that if it is not life-support or does squire Chen or both then it is not a burgrass hold. sent16: there is something such that if that it is not a dermatologist and/or it is meiotic is incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of a X-ray hold. sent17: there is something such that if the fact that either it is not calcifugous or it does scorch ferrocerium or both is wrong it is not a Jensen. sent18: the magnification is not a burgrass if it is not life-support or it does squire Chen or both. sent19: if the fact that the placer does not kennel tailgate and/or is a kind of a contrivance is not right it is not tubal. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__