the fact that if the efflorescence does not occur then the trapping occurs and the masking Alabaman happens is not right.
sent1: the masking Alabaman occurs if that not the sensualizing continence but the variety happens does not hold. sent2: the fact that the sensualizing continence occurs and the variety happens is not true. sent3: that the sensualizing continence occurs prevents that the masking Alabaman does not occur. sent4: both the sensualizing concordance and the non-Nicaraguanness happens if the orthopedicsness happens. sent5: the Nicaraguan does not occur. sent6: if the efflorescence happens then the trapping occurs and the masking Alabaman occurs. sent7: that the subcorticalness does not occur but the bedrest happens does not hold. sent8: if the efflorescence does not occur then the fact that both the sensualizing continence and the variety occurs is false. sent9: the influencing and the haranguing occurs. sent10: that the sortition happens is caused by that the subvention but not the bastinado happens. sent11: that the fact that the sensualizing continence does not occur but the variety occurs does not hold is right if the fact that the efflorescence does not occur is not wrong. sent12: if that both the non-analogueness and the partying happens does not hold the referencing occurs. sent13: if the fact that both the non-morphophonemicsness and the encasement occurs is incorrect the masking Bellini occurs. sent14: if that the formicness does not occur hold then that not the peal but the sampling happens is not true. sent15: the frock happens if the steepening half-mast but not the subvention occurs. sent16: the medication occurs and the sortition occurs if the sampling does not occur. sent17: the orthopedicsness occurs. sent18: that the sensualizing porbeagle does not occur and the gravel happens is wrong. sent19: if the sensualizing concordance happens but the Nicaraguan does not occur then the trapping happens. sent20: that not the sensualizing continence but the variety occurs is incorrect if the efflorescence happens. sent21: that that the trapping occurs is brought about by that both the sensualizing concordance and the Nicaraguan happens hold. sent22: the fact that the demurrage does not occur is right. sent23: that the poll happens but the face-off does not occur prevents that the semaphoring does not occur. sent24: the Nicaraguanness does not occur if the orthopedicsness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the efflorescence does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the sensualizing continence but the variety happens is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the masking Alabaman happens.; sent4 & sent17 -> int3: the sensualizing concordance happens but the Nicaraguanness does not occur.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: the trap occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the trapping and the masking Alabaman happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the efflorescence does not occur then the trapping occurs and the masking Alabaman happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the masking Alabaman occurs if that not the sensualizing continence but the variety happens does not hold. sent2: the fact that the sensualizing continence occurs and the variety happens is not true. sent3: that the sensualizing continence occurs prevents that the masking Alabaman does not occur. sent4: both the sensualizing concordance and the non-Nicaraguanness happens if the orthopedicsness happens. sent5: the Nicaraguan does not occur. sent6: if the efflorescence happens then the trapping occurs and the masking Alabaman occurs. sent7: that the subcorticalness does not occur but the bedrest happens does not hold. sent8: if the efflorescence does not occur then the fact that both the sensualizing continence and the variety occurs is false. sent9: the influencing and the haranguing occurs. sent10: that the sortition happens is caused by that the subvention but not the bastinado happens. sent11: that the fact that the sensualizing continence does not occur but the variety occurs does not hold is right if the fact that the efflorescence does not occur is not wrong. sent12: if that both the non-analogueness and the partying happens does not hold the referencing occurs. sent13: if the fact that both the non-morphophonemicsness and the encasement occurs is incorrect the masking Bellini occurs. sent14: if that the formicness does not occur hold then that not the peal but the sampling happens is not true. sent15: the frock happens if the steepening half-mast but not the subvention occurs. sent16: the medication occurs and the sortition occurs if the sampling does not occur. sent17: the orthopedicsness occurs. sent18: that the sensualizing porbeagle does not occur and the gravel happens is wrong. sent19: if the sensualizing concordance happens but the Nicaraguan does not occur then the trapping happens. sent20: that not the sensualizing continence but the variety occurs is incorrect if the efflorescence happens. sent21: that that the trapping occurs is brought about by that both the sensualizing concordance and the Nicaraguan happens hold. sent22: the fact that the demurrage does not occur is right. sent23: that the poll happens but the face-off does not occur prevents that the semaphoring does not occur. sent24: the Nicaraguanness does not occur if the orthopedicsness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the efflorescence does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the sensualizing continence but the variety happens is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the masking Alabaman happens.; sent4 & sent17 -> int3: the sensualizing concordance happens but the Nicaraguanness does not occur.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: the trap occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the trapping and the masking Alabaman happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__