the gouger is energetic.
sent1: if the fact that something does not smash gouger is true it is not energetic. sent2: something does smash gouger and/or it is not Andean if it is not a kind of a Pentecost. sent3: the neodymium smashes gouger. sent4: if that the neodymium does stale omelet is not incorrect the fact that it does not smash gouger hold. sent5: the fact that the methapyrilene stales omelet is not incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the neodymium is not pedunculate and/or it stales omelet is wrong then the gouger is energetic. sent7: The gouger smashes neodymium. sent8: if the neodymium is not pedunculate and/or does stale omelet it does not smash gouger.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neodymium is not pedunculate or it stales omelet or both.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the neodymium does not smash gouger.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the neodymium is not pedunculate and/or does stale omelet is not correct.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the gouger is not energetic is right.
sent1 -> int4: if the gouger does not smash gouger then it is not energetic.; sent2 -> int5: if the neodymium is not a Pentecost it smashes gouger and/or it is not Andean.;
$hypothesis$ = the gouger is energetic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not smash gouger is true it is not energetic. sent2: something does smash gouger and/or it is not Andean if it is not a kind of a Pentecost. sent3: the neodymium smashes gouger. sent4: if that the neodymium does stale omelet is not incorrect the fact that it does not smash gouger hold. sent5: the fact that the methapyrilene stales omelet is not incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the neodymium is not pedunculate and/or it stales omelet is wrong then the gouger is energetic. sent7: The gouger smashes neodymium. sent8: if the neodymium is not pedunculate and/or does stale omelet it does not smash gouger. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neodymium is not pedunculate or it stales omelet or both.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the neodymium does not smash gouger.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the neodymium is not pedunculate and/or does stale omelet is not correct.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__