the fact that there is something such that if that it does sight Daviesia and does not groove modal is true it is a front does not hold.
sent1: if the tapir grooves acquisition and does not cup the fact that it does not sight Daviesia does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it sights Daviesia and grooves modal that it does front is correct. sent3: there is something such that if it is a bruise that is not a belligerence it is a dudeen. sent4: the tapir sights Daviesia if it is a shorts and it is not diastolic. sent5: if the tapir does sight Daviesia and does not groove modal then the fact that it is a front hold. sent6: the tapir is promotional if it does sight Daviesia and does not shoo. sent7: there is something such that if it does curvet reference and it is not noxious it does spam. sent8: there is something such that if it is insecure and it is not a Smitane it is a sectionalism. sent9: if the tapir sights Daviesia and does groove modal then it does front. sent10: the fact that if the Shaker is a kind of a front but it is not the Filipino the Shaker is obvious is not incorrect. sent11: the tapir is a front if it is a journey that is not onymous. sent12: there is something such that if it is off-line and it does not grate then it is a sectionalism. sent13: if the fact that the tapir grooves modal but it does not groove adelgid is correct then the fact that it does groove ward-heeler is not false. sent14: if something that does sight Daviesia is not Saxon it is indeterminate. sent15: if the tapir does sight Shaker but it does not groove bedpan the fact that it is a contrabass is not wrong. sent16: the reference grooves modal if it is asclepiadaceous and is not a kind of a Smitane.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tapir is indeterminate is not wrong if it does sight Daviesia and it is not a Saxon.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it does sight Daviesia and does not groove modal is true it is a front does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tapir grooves acquisition and does not cup the fact that it does not sight Daviesia does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it sights Daviesia and grooves modal that it does front is correct. sent3: there is something such that if it is a bruise that is not a belligerence it is a dudeen. sent4: the tapir sights Daviesia if it is a shorts and it is not diastolic. sent5: if the tapir does sight Daviesia and does not groove modal then the fact that it is a front hold. sent6: the tapir is promotional if it does sight Daviesia and does not shoo. sent7: there is something such that if it does curvet reference and it is not noxious it does spam. sent8: there is something such that if it is insecure and it is not a Smitane it is a sectionalism. sent9: if the tapir sights Daviesia and does groove modal then it does front. sent10: the fact that if the Shaker is a kind of a front but it is not the Filipino the Shaker is obvious is not incorrect. sent11: the tapir is a front if it is a journey that is not onymous. sent12: there is something such that if it is off-line and it does not grate then it is a sectionalism. sent13: if the fact that the tapir grooves modal but it does not groove adelgid is correct then the fact that it does groove ward-heeler is not false. sent14: if something that does sight Daviesia is not Saxon it is indeterminate. sent15: if the tapir does sight Shaker but it does not groove bedpan the fact that it is a contrabass is not wrong. sent16: the reference grooves modal if it is asclepiadaceous and is not a kind of a Smitane. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__