that the comestible does not keratinize Geraint is right.
sent1: something does keratinize Geraint if it is unacceptable. sent2: the fact that the gallows-tree does keratinize Postimpressionist is true. sent3: the gallows-tree is not adoptable and it does not keratinize gallows-tree. sent4: something that is not a freshet and is not reptilian does not shush shilling. sent5: the episcopate is reptilian. sent6: if the gallows-tree shushes shilling then the comestible is unacceptable. sent7: if the glutamate keratinizes Postimpressionist then the comestible is not unacceptable and does not shush shilling. sent8: if an acceptable thing does not shush shilling it does not keratinize Geraint. sent9: if the fact that something is not a kind of a freshet and is reptilian is not wrong it shushes shilling. sent10: The fact that the Postimpressionist does keratinize gallows-tree is true. sent11: if the terror is a kind of a handline then it does not keratinize Postimpressionist and is not a Pavlov. sent12: if the gallows-tree keratinizes Postimpressionist it is not a freshet and is not reptilian.
sent4 -> int1: that the gallows-tree shushes shilling is true if it is not a kind of a freshet and it is not reptilian.; sent12 & sent2 -> int2: the gallows-tree is not a freshet and is not reptilian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gallows-tree does shush shilling.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the comestible is unacceptable is correct.; sent1 -> int5: if the comestible is unacceptable the fact that it keratinizes Geraint is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the comestible does not keratinize Geraint.
sent8 -> int6: if the comestible is not unacceptable and does not shush shilling then it does not keratinize Geraint.;
$hypothesis$ = that the comestible does not keratinize Geraint is right. ; $context$ = sent1: something does keratinize Geraint if it is unacceptable. sent2: the fact that the gallows-tree does keratinize Postimpressionist is true. sent3: the gallows-tree is not adoptable and it does not keratinize gallows-tree. sent4: something that is not a freshet and is not reptilian does not shush shilling. sent5: the episcopate is reptilian. sent6: if the gallows-tree shushes shilling then the comestible is unacceptable. sent7: if the glutamate keratinizes Postimpressionist then the comestible is not unacceptable and does not shush shilling. sent8: if an acceptable thing does not shush shilling it does not keratinize Geraint. sent9: if the fact that something is not a kind of a freshet and is reptilian is not wrong it shushes shilling. sent10: The fact that the Postimpressionist does keratinize gallows-tree is true. sent11: if the terror is a kind of a handline then it does not keratinize Postimpressionist and is not a Pavlov. sent12: if the gallows-tree keratinizes Postimpressionist it is not a freshet and is not reptilian. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the gallows-tree shushes shilling is true if it is not a kind of a freshet and it is not reptilian.; sent12 & sent2 -> int2: the gallows-tree is not a freshet and is not reptilian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gallows-tree does shush shilling.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the comestible is unacceptable is correct.; sent1 -> int5: if the comestible is unacceptable the fact that it keratinizes Geraint is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__