that something is staccato and a valetudinarian is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a masculine. sent2: there exists something such that it is non-leaky. sent3: the Mam is an egotism but it does not tout babysitter if the fact that something is non-leaky hold. sent4: the coondog is staccato and it touts babysitter if the Mam is not a valetudinarian. sent5: if something that is an egotism does not tout babysitter the preteen is not a kind of a spell. sent6: if the preteen is not a spell the coondog is staccato and a valetudinarian. sent7: the preteen does not tout babysitter.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the Mam is an egotism that does not tout babysitter.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is an egotism and it does not tout babysitter.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the preteen does not spell.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the coondog is staccato and is not non-valetudinarian.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that something is staccato and a valetudinarian is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a masculine. sent2: there exists something such that it is non-leaky. sent3: the Mam is an egotism but it does not tout babysitter if the fact that something is non-leaky hold. sent4: the coondog is staccato and it touts babysitter if the Mam is not a valetudinarian. sent5: if something that is an egotism does not tout babysitter the preteen is not a kind of a spell. sent6: if the preteen is not a spell the coondog is staccato and a valetudinarian. sent7: the preteen does not tout babysitter. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the Mam is an egotism that does not tout babysitter.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is an egotism and it does not tout babysitter.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the preteen does not spell.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the coondog is staccato and is not non-valetudinarian.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__