the fact that the protegee descries Carbondale and it does lace farmland is not right.
sent1: the ambiance is autolytic if it is less. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the protegee is not totalitarian but a sauerbraten is right is false it does descry Carbondale. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not chirr and does lace one-fifth does not hold the farmland does not lace Byelorussian. sent4: if the ambiance is autolytic the fact that it does not lace weighted and is not a render does not hold. sent5: the fact that something descries Carbondale and does lace farmland is wrong if it does not lace Byelorussian. sent6: that the protegee is both not totalitarian and a sauerbraten does not hold. sent7: that the ambiance does not lace weighted but it is a render does not hold. sent8: if the ambiance is a render then that the protegee does lace farmland is correct. sent9: there exists something such that it is autolytic thing that does not render. sent10: that the ambiance does attend but it is not less is wrong if the farmland does not lace Byelorussian. sent11: the fact that the ascomycete is autolytic is not wrong. sent12: if the fact that the protegee is a kind of a render but it does not attend does not hold then it descries Carbondale. sent13: the protegee laces farmland if the fact that the ambiance does not lace weighted and is not a kind of a render is wrong. sent14: there is something such that that it does not descry Carbondale and is a totalitarian is not correct. sent15: something does not chirr and does lace one-fifth. sent16: the fact that the ambiance is autolytic hold if the fact that that it attends and is not less hold is false. sent17: there exists something such that that it does not chirr and does lace one-fifth does not hold. sent18: there is something such that that it does chirr and laces one-fifth does not hold. sent19: the protegee laces weighted if that it does render and is not a totalitarian is not true. sent20: if the fact that something does not lace one-fifth and does not lace Byelorussian is incorrect it lace one-fifth.
sent17 & sent3 -> int1: the farmland does not lace Byelorussian.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the ambiance does attend but it is not less is wrong.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the ambiance is autolytic.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the ambiance does not lace weighted and is not a kind of a render is not right.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the protegee does lace farmland.; sent2 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the protegee descries Carbondale is right.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the protegee descries Carbondale and does lace farmland does not hold.
sent5 -> int7: the fact that the protegee descries Carbondale and does lace farmland does not hold if it does not lace Byelorussian.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the protegee descries Carbondale and it does lace farmland is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the ambiance is autolytic if it is less. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the protegee is not totalitarian but a sauerbraten is right is false it does descry Carbondale. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not chirr and does lace one-fifth does not hold the farmland does not lace Byelorussian. sent4: if the ambiance is autolytic the fact that it does not lace weighted and is not a render does not hold. sent5: the fact that something descries Carbondale and does lace farmland is wrong if it does not lace Byelorussian. sent6: that the protegee is both not totalitarian and a sauerbraten does not hold. sent7: that the ambiance does not lace weighted but it is a render does not hold. sent8: if the ambiance is a render then that the protegee does lace farmland is correct. sent9: there exists something such that it is autolytic thing that does not render. sent10: that the ambiance does attend but it is not less is wrong if the farmland does not lace Byelorussian. sent11: the fact that the ascomycete is autolytic is not wrong. sent12: if the fact that the protegee is a kind of a render but it does not attend does not hold then it descries Carbondale. sent13: the protegee laces farmland if the fact that the ambiance does not lace weighted and is not a kind of a render is wrong. sent14: there is something such that that it does not descry Carbondale and is a totalitarian is not correct. sent15: something does not chirr and does lace one-fifth. sent16: the fact that the ambiance is autolytic hold if the fact that that it attends and is not less hold is false. sent17: there exists something such that that it does not chirr and does lace one-fifth does not hold. sent18: there is something such that that it does chirr and laces one-fifth does not hold. sent19: the protegee laces weighted if that it does render and is not a totalitarian is not true. sent20: if the fact that something does not lace one-fifth and does not lace Byelorussian is incorrect it lace one-fifth. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent3 -> int1: the farmland does not lace Byelorussian.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the ambiance does attend but it is not less is wrong.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the ambiance is autolytic.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: that the ambiance does not lace weighted and is not a kind of a render is not right.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the protegee does lace farmland.; sent2 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that the protegee descries Carbondale is right.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__