the Peel is not mammary.
sent1: the barilla is a conifer if there exists something such that that it does not construct Peel and is inexpressible is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it is not leptosporangiate. sent3: the fact that the maze does not construct Peel but it is inexpressible does not hold if there is something such that it is not leptosporangiate. sent4: the Peel does not wrap concealment and it is not mammary if the barilla does not hunger faineance. sent5: something that is a conifer and/or numerical does not hunger faineance.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that that the maze does not construct Peel and is inexpressible is not incorrect does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not construct Peel and is inexpressible is false.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the barilla is a conifer is not wrong.; int3 -> int4: the barilla is a conifer and/or it is numerical.; sent5 -> int5: if the barilla is a conifer or it is numerical or both it does not hunger faineance.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the barilla does not hunger faineance.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the Peel does not wrap concealment and is not mammary.; int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Peel is not mammary. ; $context$ = sent1: the barilla is a conifer if there exists something such that that it does not construct Peel and is inexpressible is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it is not leptosporangiate. sent3: the fact that the maze does not construct Peel but it is inexpressible does not hold if there is something such that it is not leptosporangiate. sent4: the Peel does not wrap concealment and it is not mammary if the barilla does not hunger faineance. sent5: something that is a conifer and/or numerical does not hunger faineance. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that that the maze does not construct Peel and is inexpressible is not incorrect does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not construct Peel and is inexpressible is false.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the barilla is a conifer is not wrong.; int3 -> int4: the barilla is a conifer and/or it is numerical.; sent5 -> int5: if the barilla is a conifer or it is numerical or both it does not hunger faineance.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the barilla does not hunger faineance.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the Peel does not wrap concealment and is not mammary.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__