the cereal is limbless.
sent1: the mannequin is not a Aruru. sent2: the mannequin is not a Aruru and is limbed. sent3: the trigeminal worsts if the mannequin is a bronze. sent4: the whipping smells. sent5: the whipping is excretory if it does smell. sent6: if something that is a bronze is a worsted it is not limbless. sent7: if the tureen does enliven grissino it is elysian and it is not messianic. sent8: if there is something such that it does burglarize and it is not astronomic then the cereal does bronze. sent9: something is not a kind of a worsted if it is limbless and it is astronomic. sent10: something does burglarize but it is not astronomic if it is annexational. sent11: that the trigeminal does reassail Woollcott and/or it is non-Manchurian is false if there exists something such that it silvers. sent12: if the trigeminal is worsted then it is not astronomic. sent13: if the whipping is excretory the plumbago does enliven chasteness. sent14: that the boisterousness enlivens sext and does reassail cereal is wrong. sent15: if the tureen is elysian but it is not messianic then the cereal is not elysian. sent16: that the trigeminal is not astronomic is true. sent17: the mannequin is not euphonic and it is not a kind of a Aruru. sent18: that the mannequin is a kind of non-euphonic thing that is not a Aruru is false if it does not bronze. sent19: if something is not elysian then it is a Whitsun and is worsted. sent20: the trigeminal is limbless. sent21: if the trigeminal is not elysian then it is a Whitsun and astronomic. sent22: the mannequin is annexational if there exists something such that that either it does reassail Woollcott or it is not Manchurian or both is not correct. sent23: if the trigeminal worsts that it does not burglarize and is not astronomic is not incorrect. sent24: if something enlivens chasteness it is a silver and it is not a lilyturf.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mannequin is not a bronze.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the mannequin is both not euphonic and not a Aruru does not hold.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the mannequin bronzes.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the trigeminal is not non-worsted.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the trigeminal does not burglarize and it is not astronomic.;
the silly does not burglarize.
sent9 -> int6: the trigeminal does not worst if it is both limbless and astronomic.;
$hypothesis$ = the cereal is limbless. ; $context$ = sent1: the mannequin is not a Aruru. sent2: the mannequin is not a Aruru and is limbed. sent3: the trigeminal worsts if the mannequin is a bronze. sent4: the whipping smells. sent5: the whipping is excretory if it does smell. sent6: if something that is a bronze is a worsted it is not limbless. sent7: if the tureen does enliven grissino it is elysian and it is not messianic. sent8: if there is something such that it does burglarize and it is not astronomic then the cereal does bronze. sent9: something is not a kind of a worsted if it is limbless and it is astronomic. sent10: something does burglarize but it is not astronomic if it is annexational. sent11: that the trigeminal does reassail Woollcott and/or it is non-Manchurian is false if there exists something such that it silvers. sent12: if the trigeminal is worsted then it is not astronomic. sent13: if the whipping is excretory the plumbago does enliven chasteness. sent14: that the boisterousness enlivens sext and does reassail cereal is wrong. sent15: if the tureen is elysian but it is not messianic then the cereal is not elysian. sent16: that the trigeminal is not astronomic is true. sent17: the mannequin is not euphonic and it is not a kind of a Aruru. sent18: that the mannequin is a kind of non-euphonic thing that is not a Aruru is false if it does not bronze. sent19: if something is not elysian then it is a Whitsun and is worsted. sent20: the trigeminal is limbless. sent21: if the trigeminal is not elysian then it is a Whitsun and astronomic. sent22: the mannequin is annexational if there exists something such that that either it does reassail Woollcott or it is not Manchurian or both is not correct. sent23: if the trigeminal worsts that it does not burglarize and is not astronomic is not incorrect. sent24: if something enlivens chasteness it is a silver and it is not a lilyturf. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mannequin is not a bronze.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the mannequin is both not euphonic and not a Aruru does not hold.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the mannequin bronzes.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the trigeminal is not non-worsted.; int4 & sent23 -> int5: the trigeminal does not burglarize and it is not astronomic.; __UNKNOWN__