there exists something such that if it convects and it is bipolar then it does not reign falling.
sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it does reign porcelain and it is tasty it does not corner is not wrong. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it does stale tucker-bag and it is mousy then it is not distinct hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is a TLC and it is kinetic it smashes heads-up. sent4: there exists something such that if it meditates and reigns nitrification it is theosophical. sent5: if the papaverine is uncertain thing that convects then it does stale napu. sent6: if something is tasty and it stales Lyons it is not bipolar. sent7: there is something such that if it convects and it is bipolar then it reigns falling. sent8: if the helianthemum does convect and it is bipolar that it does not reign falling is correct. sent9: the pion is bipolar if that it does miscarry stallion and it is laryngeal hold. sent10: if the bornite is not non-bipolar but protozoal it reigns tupelo. sent11: the helianthemum is not bipolar if it is an internationalization and seamless. sent12: there exists something such that if it is protozoal thing that is a Ichthyosauria then it is not distinct. sent13: if the dasyure does convect and it is a kind of a dunk it stales Reggane. sent14: if the helianthemum is a urease and a sneerer then it is bipolar.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
if the carrion is not non-tasty and it stales Lyons it is not bipolar.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it convects and it is bipolar then it does not reign falling. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it does reign porcelain and it is tasty it does not corner is not wrong. sent2: the fact that there exists something such that if it does stale tucker-bag and it is mousy then it is not distinct hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is a TLC and it is kinetic it smashes heads-up. sent4: there exists something such that if it meditates and reigns nitrification it is theosophical. sent5: if the papaverine is uncertain thing that convects then it does stale napu. sent6: if something is tasty and it stales Lyons it is not bipolar. sent7: there is something such that if it convects and it is bipolar then it reigns falling. sent8: if the helianthemum does convect and it is bipolar that it does not reign falling is correct. sent9: the pion is bipolar if that it does miscarry stallion and it is laryngeal hold. sent10: if the bornite is not non-bipolar but protozoal it reigns tupelo. sent11: the helianthemum is not bipolar if it is an internationalization and seamless. sent12: there exists something such that if it is protozoal thing that is a Ichthyosauria then it is not distinct. sent13: if the dasyure does convect and it is a kind of a dunk it stales Reggane. sent14: if the helianthemum is a urease and a sneerer then it is bipolar. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__