the bastnasite does not wive.
sent1: the Newfoundland is not nonfissionable. sent2: the bastnasite does not wive if that the tablet is not a Muscari and it does not rustle Sisyridae does not hold. sent3: the Newfoundland is a mannequin if the cultivar welds used. sent4: if the tablet is a Muscari then the bastnasite does not wive. sent5: if something is not a Tara but it does rustle lunula then that the solicitor is not inclement hold. sent6: if the tablet is a Muscari it is inclement and/or it does not rustle Sisyridae. sent7: the solicitor is inclement if the Newfoundland is not conquerable and it is not nonfissionable. sent8: if the brickbat does decoy then that the tablet is not a Muscari and does not rustle Sisyridae is not right. sent9: something rustles lunula and is inclement. sent10: if the cultivar does weld used then the fact that the Newfoundland is a kind of a mannequin that does not decoy is not right. sent11: if something is not a kind of a decoy then it is not a Tara and rustles lunula. sent12: that the tablet does not wive but it does reimburse rand is correct. sent13: the brickbat is conquerable. sent14: if the stone is not a overage and is a kind of a heronry then the cultivar welds used. sent15: if the fact that something is not nonfissionable and it is not conquerable is incorrect then it is not a Muscari. sent16: the stone is not a overage but a heronry. sent17: if the solicitor is not inclement but it wives then the bastnasite does wives. sent18: the tablet does decoy if something is a kind of a decoy or it does not rustle Sisyridae or both. sent19: the stone is not a overage.
sent11 -> int1: if the brickbat is not a decoy it is not a kind of a Tara and it does rustle lunula.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brickbat does not decoy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the brickbat is not a Tara but it does rustle lunula.; int2 -> int3: something is not a kind of a Tara and rustles lunula.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the solicitor is clement.; sent14 & sent16 -> int5: the cultivar does weld used.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Newfoundland is a mannequin is true.;
the bastnasite does wive.
sent15 -> int7: the fact that the stone is not the Muscari if the fact that the stone is both not nonfissionable and not conquerable is not right hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the bastnasite does not wive. ; $context$ = sent1: the Newfoundland is not nonfissionable. sent2: the bastnasite does not wive if that the tablet is not a Muscari and it does not rustle Sisyridae does not hold. sent3: the Newfoundland is a mannequin if the cultivar welds used. sent4: if the tablet is a Muscari then the bastnasite does not wive. sent5: if something is not a Tara but it does rustle lunula then that the solicitor is not inclement hold. sent6: if the tablet is a Muscari it is inclement and/or it does not rustle Sisyridae. sent7: the solicitor is inclement if the Newfoundland is not conquerable and it is not nonfissionable. sent8: if the brickbat does decoy then that the tablet is not a Muscari and does not rustle Sisyridae is not right. sent9: something rustles lunula and is inclement. sent10: if the cultivar does weld used then the fact that the Newfoundland is a kind of a mannequin that does not decoy is not right. sent11: if something is not a kind of a decoy then it is not a Tara and rustles lunula. sent12: that the tablet does not wive but it does reimburse rand is correct. sent13: the brickbat is conquerable. sent14: if the stone is not a overage and is a kind of a heronry then the cultivar welds used. sent15: if the fact that something is not nonfissionable and it is not conquerable is incorrect then it is not a Muscari. sent16: the stone is not a overage but a heronry. sent17: if the solicitor is not inclement but it wives then the bastnasite does wives. sent18: the tablet does decoy if something is a kind of a decoy or it does not rustle Sisyridae or both. sent19: the stone is not a overage. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the brickbat is not a decoy it is not a kind of a Tara and it does rustle lunula.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brickbat does not decoy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the brickbat is not a Tara but it does rustle lunula.; int2 -> int3: something is not a kind of a Tara and rustles lunula.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the solicitor is clement.; sent14 & sent16 -> int5: the cultivar does weld used.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Newfoundland is a mannequin is true.; __UNKNOWN__