the timothy is stainable and/or it is a kind of a Munch.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not acetylenic. sent2: something is not asynergic if it is not a foreshank. sent3: the Samson is postnatal if it does guarantee olivenite. sent4: if that the Samson queens pessimism is right then the olivenite does queens pessimism but it is not hydrodynamic. sent5: if the draftee is not a kind of a foreshank then the Samson queens pessimism but it is not a foreshank. sent6: something is stainable or a Munch or both if it is not a voyage. sent7: if something is not acetylenic then the Samson is a tinware that guarantees olivenite. sent8: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of non-asynergic a foreshank is wrong if it does not voyage is not wrong. sent9: if something that does queen pessimism is non-hydrodynamic the timothy is not a kind of a voyage. sent10: that something either is stainable or is a kind of a Munch or both is incorrect if it is not a kind of a foreshank. sent11: the fact that something does queen pessimism but it is not hydrodynamic is not true if it is postnatal. sent12: the olivenite is not hydrodynamic.
sent6 -> int1: if the timothy does not voyage then it is stainable and/or it is a kind of a Munch.;
the sissy is not asynergic.
sent2 -> int2: if the sissy is not a kind of a foreshank it is not asynergic.;
$hypothesis$ = the timothy is stainable and/or it is a kind of a Munch. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not acetylenic. sent2: something is not asynergic if it is not a foreshank. sent3: the Samson is postnatal if it does guarantee olivenite. sent4: if that the Samson queens pessimism is right then the olivenite does queens pessimism but it is not hydrodynamic. sent5: if the draftee is not a kind of a foreshank then the Samson queens pessimism but it is not a foreshank. sent6: something is stainable or a Munch or both if it is not a voyage. sent7: if something is not acetylenic then the Samson is a tinware that guarantees olivenite. sent8: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of non-asynergic a foreshank is wrong if it does not voyage is not wrong. sent9: if something that does queen pessimism is non-hydrodynamic the timothy is not a kind of a voyage. sent10: that something either is stainable or is a kind of a Munch or both is incorrect if it is not a kind of a foreshank. sent11: the fact that something does queen pessimism but it is not hydrodynamic is not true if it is postnatal. sent12: the olivenite is not hydrodynamic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the timothy does not voyage then it is stainable and/or it is a kind of a Munch.; __UNKNOWN__