the competition but not the liveliness occurs.
sent1: if the flintiness happens the unconstitutionalness does not occur. sent2: that the blaspheming technobabble happens is not incorrect. sent3: if the overheadness does not occur then the ctenoidness happens and the abasement occurs. sent4: if the exhibit does not occur the parlay occurs. sent5: the fact that either the surprising jawed happens or the exhibit does not occur or both is not false. sent6: if the blaspheming NIPR happens then that the fact that the non-soteriologicalness and the RAIU happens is true is incorrect. sent7: if the ionicness occurs and the blaspheming technobabble happens the liveliness does not occur. sent8: the blaspheming positioner happens or the airflow does not occur or both. sent9: the surprising jawed does not occur if the fact that both the surprising jawed and the exploration happens is incorrect. sent10: the parlay does not occur if the surprising jawed occurs. sent11: that both the non-mediatorialness and the tinniness occurs is brought about by the abasement. sent12: if the ovularness happens the flintiness occurs. sent13: that the surprising jawed happens and the exploration happens is not true if the unconstitutionalness does not occur. sent14: that the rascality does not occur results in that the mintiness occurs and/or that the unpatrioticness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the non-soteriologicalness and the RAIU occurs is false then the rascality does not occur. sent16: the blaspheming NIPR occurs. sent17: if the parlaying does not occur then the competition happens. sent18: the parlay does not occur if the exhibiting does not occur. sent19: that the competition occurs and the liveliness does not occur is not correct if the ionicness does not occur. sent20: the ionicness happens. sent21: if the autofluorescence occurs that the surprising Chagall does not occur is right. sent22: that the ovularness happens is brought about by that the non-mediatorialness and the tinniness occurs.
sent20 & sent2 -> int1: the ionicness occurs and the blaspheming technobabble happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the liveliness does not occur.; sent5 & sent10 & sent18 -> int3: the parlaying does not occur.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the competition occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the competition occurs but the liveliness does not occur is incorrect.
sent6 & sent16 -> int5: the fact that the soteriologicalness does not occur and the RAIU happens is incorrect.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the rascality does not occur.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the mintiness and/or the unpatrioticness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the competition but not the liveliness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flintiness happens the unconstitutionalness does not occur. sent2: that the blaspheming technobabble happens is not incorrect. sent3: if the overheadness does not occur then the ctenoidness happens and the abasement occurs. sent4: if the exhibit does not occur the parlay occurs. sent5: the fact that either the surprising jawed happens or the exhibit does not occur or both is not false. sent6: if the blaspheming NIPR happens then that the fact that the non-soteriologicalness and the RAIU happens is true is incorrect. sent7: if the ionicness occurs and the blaspheming technobabble happens the liveliness does not occur. sent8: the blaspheming positioner happens or the airflow does not occur or both. sent9: the surprising jawed does not occur if the fact that both the surprising jawed and the exploration happens is incorrect. sent10: the parlay does not occur if the surprising jawed occurs. sent11: that both the non-mediatorialness and the tinniness occurs is brought about by the abasement. sent12: if the ovularness happens the flintiness occurs. sent13: that the surprising jawed happens and the exploration happens is not true if the unconstitutionalness does not occur. sent14: that the rascality does not occur results in that the mintiness occurs and/or that the unpatrioticness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the non-soteriologicalness and the RAIU occurs is false then the rascality does not occur. sent16: the blaspheming NIPR occurs. sent17: if the parlaying does not occur then the competition happens. sent18: the parlay does not occur if the exhibiting does not occur. sent19: that the competition occurs and the liveliness does not occur is not correct if the ionicness does not occur. sent20: the ionicness happens. sent21: if the autofluorescence occurs that the surprising Chagall does not occur is right. sent22: that the ovularness happens is brought about by that the non-mediatorialness and the tinniness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent2 -> int1: the ionicness occurs and the blaspheming technobabble happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the liveliness does not occur.; sent5 & sent10 & sent18 -> int3: the parlaying does not occur.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the competition occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__