the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a pyxie the fact that it is not macroeconomic and is a brunet is false is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a pyxie that it is not macroeconomic and is brunet is true. sent2: there is something such that if it is dialectal that that it does not commentate and does right primitive is not wrong does not hold. sent3: if something is a pyxie then the fact that it is non-macroeconomic thing that is brunet is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the filer is macroeconomic a brunet is wrong if it is a pyxie. sent5: the fact that something is macroeconomic and a brunet does not hold if it is a pyxie. sent6: there is something such that if it is a pyxie the fact that it is macroeconomic thing that is a brunet is not right. sent7: if the filer is unconstitutional then that that it does not din polyploid and is macroeconomic is true is false. sent8: the fact that the filer is not cerebellar but it is Teutonic is not right if it patronizes Menticirrhus. sent9: something that is a pyxie is not macroeconomic and is brunet. sent10: if the filer is a kind of a pyxie it is a kind of non-macroeconomic thing that is a brunet. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a isobutylene then that it is not morphophonemics but abranchiate is not right.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the filer is not macroeconomic but a brunet is not correct if it is a kind of a pyxie.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a pyxie the fact that it is not macroeconomic and is a brunet is false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a pyxie that it is not macroeconomic and is brunet is true. sent2: there is something such that if it is dialectal that that it does not commentate and does right primitive is not wrong does not hold. sent3: if something is a pyxie then the fact that it is non-macroeconomic thing that is brunet is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the filer is macroeconomic a brunet is wrong if it is a pyxie. sent5: the fact that something is macroeconomic and a brunet does not hold if it is a pyxie. sent6: there is something such that if it is a pyxie the fact that it is macroeconomic thing that is a brunet is not right. sent7: if the filer is unconstitutional then that that it does not din polyploid and is macroeconomic is true is false. sent8: the fact that the filer is not cerebellar but it is Teutonic is not right if it patronizes Menticirrhus. sent9: something that is a pyxie is not macroeconomic and is brunet. sent10: if the filer is a kind of a pyxie it is a kind of non-macroeconomic thing that is a brunet. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a isobutylene then that it is not morphophonemics but abranchiate is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the filer is not macroeconomic but a brunet is not correct if it is a kind of a pyxie.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__