the fact that the admeasuring lepidopterist does not occur is true.
sent1: the trundle occurs. sent2: that the Caliphate occurs but the astrolatry does not occur is caused by the yearning. sent3: the non-theocraticness is caused by that the admeasuring Edward occurs and the admeasuring lepidopterist happens. sent4: if the varnishing does not occur then the Litany and/or the underachievement occurs. sent5: if that the varnishing does not occur and the underachievement occurs does not hold the underachievement does not occur. sent6: if that the fact that that the interdisciplinariness and the varnish occurs is not incorrect is not right is true the varnish does not occur. sent7: the admeasuring Arminianism occurs. sent8: that both the theocraticness and the knee-lengthness happens is right if the underachievement does not occur. sent9: the admeasuring lepidopterist and the trundling happens if the admeasuring Edward does not occur. sent10: the requiescat happens. sent11: that the varnish does not occur but the underachievement happens is false. sent12: if the astrolatry does not occur then the fact that the interdisciplinariness and the varnish occurs is incorrect. sent13: both the trundling and the admeasuring Edward happens. sent14: the admeasuring touch-typist and the glacialness occurs.
sent13 -> int1: the admeasuring Edward occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the admeasuring lepidopterist happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the admeasuring Edward and the admeasuring lepidopterist happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the theocraticness does not occur.; sent5 & sent11 -> int4: the underachievement does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the theocraticness and the knee-lengthness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the theocraticness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the admeasuring lepidopterist happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the admeasuring lepidopterist does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the trundle occurs. sent2: that the Caliphate occurs but the astrolatry does not occur is caused by the yearning. sent3: the non-theocraticness is caused by that the admeasuring Edward occurs and the admeasuring lepidopterist happens. sent4: if the varnishing does not occur then the Litany and/or the underachievement occurs. sent5: if that the varnishing does not occur and the underachievement occurs does not hold the underachievement does not occur. sent6: if that the fact that that the interdisciplinariness and the varnish occurs is not incorrect is not right is true the varnish does not occur. sent7: the admeasuring Arminianism occurs. sent8: that both the theocraticness and the knee-lengthness happens is right if the underachievement does not occur. sent9: the admeasuring lepidopterist and the trundling happens if the admeasuring Edward does not occur. sent10: the requiescat happens. sent11: that the varnish does not occur but the underachievement happens is false. sent12: if the astrolatry does not occur then the fact that the interdisciplinariness and the varnish occurs is incorrect. sent13: both the trundling and the admeasuring Edward happens. sent14: the admeasuring touch-typist and the glacialness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the admeasuring Edward occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the admeasuring lepidopterist happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the admeasuring Edward and the admeasuring lepidopterist happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the theocraticness does not occur.; sent5 & sent11 -> int4: the underachievement does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the theocraticness and the knee-lengthness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the theocraticness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__