that the pigeon is washable or does freeze-dry blastocyst or both does not hold.
sent1: the fugu housekeeps incrustation and/or is monetary. sent2: the rattle-top is not a kind of a wireless. sent3: the attrition is washable. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a residue and a dump is false. sent5: if that the rattle-top is a kind of a residue hold then the fact that the fugu is a kind of a dump hold. sent6: the fugu does not dump if something is not a dump. sent7: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a cloudlessness and it is a kind of a dump is not right. sent8: if the rattle-top is not a kind of a residue then either the pigeon is washable or it does freeze-dry blastocyst or both. sent9: the pigeon freeze-dries blastocyst and/or it does approach scrotum. sent10: if there exists something such that that it does freeze-dry blastocyst and it is a kind of a residue is not true the pigeon is not a residue. sent11: everything is not nonproprietary. sent12: the fugu is a residue. sent13: either the pigeon does freeze-dry blastocyst or it does dump or both if the rattle-top is not a kind of a residue. sent14: that the pigeon tans hold. sent15: the fugu is not a kind of a dump if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a cloudlessness and it is a kind of a dump is not correct. sent16: the pigeon does not freeze-dry blastocyst if there exists something such that that it is washable and freeze-dry blastocyst is not true. sent17: if the pigeon is a dump and not a cloudlessness it is not a kind of a residue. sent18: there exists something such that that it is washable and it freeze-dries blastocyst is not true. sent19: the pigeon is a kind of a cloudlessness. sent20: the fact that if the fugu does not freeze-dry blastocyst the pigeon is washable or it does dump or both is not false. sent21: something is a cloudlessness and it dumps. sent22: the fact that the pigeon is not a residue is incorrect if the rattle-top freeze-dries blastocyst.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rattle-top is a residue.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fugu does dump is true.; sent7 & sent15 -> int2: the fugu is not a kind of a dump.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the rattle-top is not a kind of a residue.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that either the pigeon is washable or it freeze-dries blastocyst or both is not right.
sent11 -> int5: the rattle-top is not nonproprietary.;
$hypothesis$ = that the pigeon is washable or does freeze-dry blastocyst or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fugu housekeeps incrustation and/or is monetary. sent2: the rattle-top is not a kind of a wireless. sent3: the attrition is washable. sent4: there exists something such that that it is a residue and a dump is false. sent5: if that the rattle-top is a kind of a residue hold then the fact that the fugu is a kind of a dump hold. sent6: the fugu does not dump if something is not a dump. sent7: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a cloudlessness and it is a kind of a dump is not right. sent8: if the rattle-top is not a kind of a residue then either the pigeon is washable or it does freeze-dry blastocyst or both. sent9: the pigeon freeze-dries blastocyst and/or it does approach scrotum. sent10: if there exists something such that that it does freeze-dry blastocyst and it is a kind of a residue is not true the pigeon is not a residue. sent11: everything is not nonproprietary. sent12: the fugu is a residue. sent13: either the pigeon does freeze-dry blastocyst or it does dump or both if the rattle-top is not a kind of a residue. sent14: that the pigeon tans hold. sent15: the fugu is not a kind of a dump if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a cloudlessness and it is a kind of a dump is not correct. sent16: the pigeon does not freeze-dry blastocyst if there exists something such that that it is washable and freeze-dry blastocyst is not true. sent17: if the pigeon is a dump and not a cloudlessness it is not a kind of a residue. sent18: there exists something such that that it is washable and it freeze-dries blastocyst is not true. sent19: the pigeon is a kind of a cloudlessness. sent20: the fact that if the fugu does not freeze-dry blastocyst the pigeon is washable or it does dump or both is not false. sent21: something is a cloudlessness and it dumps. sent22: the fact that the pigeon is not a residue is incorrect if the rattle-top freeze-dries blastocyst. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rattle-top is a residue.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fugu does dump is true.; sent7 & sent15 -> int2: the fugu is not a kind of a dump.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the rattle-top is not a kind of a residue.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__