the photoemission is not a kind of a Cestidae.
sent1: if that the casting denatures but it is not undemocratic is not right the monstrance is not a geotropism. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Cestidae and is not a tradition does not hold the copyist is a kind of a geotropism. sent3: the monstrance is milch. sent4: if the fact that the copyist is not a geotropism is right then the monstrance is not incongruous. sent5: the photoemission does not denature. sent6: the photoemission is not undemocratic. sent7: the casting does not denature. sent8: the copyist does not watch copyist. sent9: the mush is not a kind of a tradition. sent10: if the monstrance is a tradition then the copyist is not incongruous. sent11: if something does denature then it is a kind of a Cestidae. sent12: the copyist is democratic. sent13: the retort is not a tradition. sent14: if the fact that something is not undemocratic and/or is not a geotropism does not hold it denatures. sent15: if the casting is not a geotropism then the monstrance is not a tradition but undemocratic. sent16: if the photoemission deveins first that it is a kind of a Cestidae and is not a kind of a tradition is incorrect. sent17: the monstrance does not denature. sent18: the fact that the photoemission is a kind of a Cestidae but it is not a geotropism is wrong. sent19: the casting is democratic if the photoemission is not a Cestidae but incongruous. sent20: the copyist is not incongruous but it is a kind of a tradition if the monstrance is not a geotropism. sent21: the photoemission is not a Cestidae if the copyist is not incongruous and is a tradition. sent22: the photoemission is not incongruous. sent23: the photoemission does devein first. sent24: the fact that the copyist does not denature hold if the casting is incongruous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the casting does denature and is not undemocratic.; assump1 -> int1: the casting does denature.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the casting does denature and is not undemocratic is wrong hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the monstrance is not a geotropism.; sent20 & int4 -> int5: the copyist is not incongruous and is a kind of a tradition.; sent21 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the casting is a lawlessness but it is not incongruous.
sent16 & sent23 -> int6: the fact that the photoemission is a Cestidae but it is not a tradition is not right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Cestidae that is not a kind of a tradition is not right.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the copyist is a geotropism.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is a geotropism.;
$hypothesis$ = the photoemission is not a kind of a Cestidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the casting denatures but it is not undemocratic is not right the monstrance is not a geotropism. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Cestidae and is not a tradition does not hold the copyist is a kind of a geotropism. sent3: the monstrance is milch. sent4: if the fact that the copyist is not a geotropism is right then the monstrance is not incongruous. sent5: the photoemission does not denature. sent6: the photoemission is not undemocratic. sent7: the casting does not denature. sent8: the copyist does not watch copyist. sent9: the mush is not a kind of a tradition. sent10: if the monstrance is a tradition then the copyist is not incongruous. sent11: if something does denature then it is a kind of a Cestidae. sent12: the copyist is democratic. sent13: the retort is not a tradition. sent14: if the fact that something is not undemocratic and/or is not a geotropism does not hold it denatures. sent15: if the casting is not a geotropism then the monstrance is not a tradition but undemocratic. sent16: if the photoemission deveins first that it is a kind of a Cestidae and is not a kind of a tradition is incorrect. sent17: the monstrance does not denature. sent18: the fact that the photoemission is a kind of a Cestidae but it is not a geotropism is wrong. sent19: the casting is democratic if the photoemission is not a Cestidae but incongruous. sent20: the copyist is not incongruous but it is a kind of a tradition if the monstrance is not a geotropism. sent21: the photoemission is not a Cestidae if the copyist is not incongruous and is a tradition. sent22: the photoemission is not incongruous. sent23: the photoemission does devein first. sent24: the fact that the copyist does not denature hold if the casting is incongruous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the casting does denature and is not undemocratic.; assump1 -> int1: the casting does denature.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the casting does denature and is not undemocratic is wrong hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the monstrance is not a geotropism.; sent20 & int4 -> int5: the copyist is not incongruous and is a kind of a tradition.; sent21 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__