there is something such that if it does not single Septuagint and is not a burlesque then it does devastate.
sent1: there exists something such that if it singles Septuagint and it is not burlesque then it devastates. sent2: if something that is not a glossalgia is not a Zarqa it does chime. sent3: if the aragonite does not single Septuagint and is not a burlesque it devastates. sent4: if the aragonite does single Septuagint but it is not a burlesque then it devastates. sent5: if something that does not scratch does not single Passover then it does single sluicing. sent6: there exists something such that if it is non-antimonic thing that does not grip it is a kind of a stroke. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not single Septuagint and is a kind of a burlesque it does devastate. sent8: the aragonite is burlesque if it is both not a stroke and not a varnish. sent9: if the aragonite does not single Septuagint but it is burlesque it does devastate. sent10: if an addictive thing is not a Bourse that it singles Septuagint is not false. sent11: the caltrop is a kind of a bazaar if it does not single Loire and is not a burlesque. sent12: if the aragonite is not a girdle and it does not exceed the fact that it does single Septuagint is right. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not pity Myxinikela and it does not pity meandering it does pity bad. sent14: the aragonite is burlesque if it is not tasteful and it is not a tribuneship. sent15: if the aragonite is not a kind of a burlesque and it is not a kind of a girdle it is a Czestochowa.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
that there exists something such that if it is not a scratch and it does not single Passover it does single sluicing is true.
sent5 -> int1: if the diphenhydramine is not a scratch and it does not single Passover it singles sluicing.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not single Septuagint and is not a burlesque then it does devastate. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it singles Septuagint and it is not burlesque then it devastates. sent2: if something that is not a glossalgia is not a Zarqa it does chime. sent3: if the aragonite does not single Septuagint and is not a burlesque it devastates. sent4: if the aragonite does single Septuagint but it is not a burlesque then it devastates. sent5: if something that does not scratch does not single Passover then it does single sluicing. sent6: there exists something such that if it is non-antimonic thing that does not grip it is a kind of a stroke. sent7: there exists something such that if it does not single Septuagint and is a kind of a burlesque it does devastate. sent8: the aragonite is burlesque if it is both not a stroke and not a varnish. sent9: if the aragonite does not single Septuagint but it is burlesque it does devastate. sent10: if an addictive thing is not a Bourse that it singles Septuagint is not false. sent11: the caltrop is a kind of a bazaar if it does not single Loire and is not a burlesque. sent12: if the aragonite is not a girdle and it does not exceed the fact that it does single Septuagint is right. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not pity Myxinikela and it does not pity meandering it does pity bad. sent14: the aragonite is burlesque if it is not tasteful and it is not a tribuneship. sent15: if the aragonite is not a kind of a burlesque and it is not a kind of a girdle it is a Czestochowa. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__