if the Marxist is a kind of a tribology then the aglet wakes Pincus.
sent1: if the fact that the inventory wakes Pincus but it is not a kind of a tribology does not hold the herald is disjunctive. sent2: the Marxist is not a tribology if the inventory unyokes but it does not reflect ozokerite. sent3: if something is disjunctive then it does unyoke. sent4: if something does wake Kickapoo and/or it results one-twelfth the manioc does results one-twelfth. sent5: the Marxist is a kind of a tribology if the inventory does unyoke and does not reflect ozokerite. sent6: the metropolitan does wake Kickapoo and does wake propagator if it is not a pul. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not wake affine the fact that the inventory does wake Pincus but it is not a tribology does not hold. sent8: the metropolitan is a kind of a Gibraltarian but it is not a kind of a Myxosporidia. sent9: the spongefly is disjunctive. sent10: the inventory does not reflect ozokerite. sent11: if the inventory does reflect ozokerite the aglet is not non-disjunctive. sent12: if that the inventory does unyoke but it does not reflect ozokerite is not true then the aglet is disjunctive. sent13: the fact that the Marxist does not wake affine is not wrong if the aglet vacates and/or is not a condylion. sent14: something is not a pul if it is both a Gibraltarian and not a Myxosporidia. sent15: if the inventory unyokes and it does reflect ozokerite then the Marxist is not a tribology. sent16: that the inventory does unyoke and reflects ozokerite is false. sent17: if the manioc results one-twelfth then the fact that the aglet vacates and/or is not a condylion hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the inventory does unyoke and does not reflect ozokerite.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the Marxist is not a tribology.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Marxist is a kind of a tribology.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the inventory unyokes but it does not reflect ozokerite is incorrect is not incorrect.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the aglet is disjunctive.;
the herald does unyoke.
sent3 -> int5: the herald unyokes if it is disjunctive.; sent14 -> int6: the metropolitan is not a pul if it is a Gibraltarian and not a Myxosporidia.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the metropolitan is not a pul.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the metropolitan wakes Kickapoo and it does wake propagator.; int8 -> int9: the metropolitan does wake Kickapoo.; int9 -> int10: either the metropolitan wakes Kickapoo or it results one-twelfth or both.; int10 -> int11: something does wake Kickapoo or it results one-twelfth or both.; int11 & sent4 -> int12: the manioc does result one-twelfth.; sent17 & int12 -> int13: the aglet does vacate and/or it is not a condylion.; sent13 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the Marxist does not wake affine is right.; int14 -> int15: something does not wake affine.; int15 & sent7 -> int16: that the inventory does wake Pincus and is not a tribology does not hold.; sent1 & int16 -> int17: the herald is disjunctive.; int5 & int17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the Marxist is a kind of a tribology then the aglet wakes Pincus. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the inventory wakes Pincus but it is not a kind of a tribology does not hold the herald is disjunctive. sent2: the Marxist is not a tribology if the inventory unyokes but it does not reflect ozokerite. sent3: if something is disjunctive then it does unyoke. sent4: if something does wake Kickapoo and/or it results one-twelfth the manioc does results one-twelfth. sent5: the Marxist is a kind of a tribology if the inventory does unyoke and does not reflect ozokerite. sent6: the metropolitan does wake Kickapoo and does wake propagator if it is not a pul. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not wake affine the fact that the inventory does wake Pincus but it is not a tribology does not hold. sent8: the metropolitan is a kind of a Gibraltarian but it is not a kind of a Myxosporidia. sent9: the spongefly is disjunctive. sent10: the inventory does not reflect ozokerite. sent11: if the inventory does reflect ozokerite the aglet is not non-disjunctive. sent12: if that the inventory does unyoke but it does not reflect ozokerite is not true then the aglet is disjunctive. sent13: the fact that the Marxist does not wake affine is not wrong if the aglet vacates and/or is not a condylion. sent14: something is not a pul if it is both a Gibraltarian and not a Myxosporidia. sent15: if the inventory unyokes and it does reflect ozokerite then the Marxist is not a tribology. sent16: that the inventory does unyoke and reflects ozokerite is false. sent17: if the manioc results one-twelfth then the fact that the aglet vacates and/or is not a condylion hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the inventory does unyoke and does not reflect ozokerite.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the Marxist is not a tribology.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Marxist is a kind of a tribology.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the inventory unyokes but it does not reflect ozokerite is incorrect is not incorrect.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the aglet is disjunctive.; __UNKNOWN__