the Lota is not cryptanalytic.
sent1: the outwork is not cryptanalytic. sent2: if something does exhilarate minder then that the trefoil is both political and non-afferent is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something exhilarates minder is true then it is not cryptanalytic. sent4: the fact that the Lota is evolutionary thing that is not monocotyledonous is wrong. sent5: something that is ossicular is a carrier. sent6: the grissino embowers worse. sent7: the fact that the Lota is both not evolutionary and not non-monocotyledonous is wrong. sent8: the fact that the trefoil is not a kind of a IIS but it is monocotyledonous does not hold. sent9: if the fact that something is both not a bird and not a zygoma is not true it is untraceable. sent10: the fact that the Lota is both not evolutionary and not monocotyledonous is incorrect if the trefoil is not monocotyledonous. sent11: something is not a IIS if the fact that it is political and it is not an afferent is not correct. sent12: the sprawler is monocotyledonous if it embowers worse. sent13: something is cryptanalytic if it does embower worse. sent14: if that something is a kind of non-evolutionary thing that is not monocotyledonous is not right it embowers worse. sent15: something is political if it is an afferent. sent16: if the outwork is not cryptanalytic then the sprawler is not evolutionary but it does embower worse. sent17: something exhilarates minder. sent18: the Lota is both afferent and not a IIS if there exists something such that it is monocotyledonous.
sent17 & sent2 -> int1: that the trefoil is both political and not afferent is not right.; sent11 -> int2: that the trefoil is not a IIS is true if that it is political and it is not a kind of an afferent does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trefoil is not a IIS.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trefoil is monocotyledonous.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the trefoil is not a IIS but it is monocotyledonous.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the trefoil is not monocotyledonous.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the Lota is non-evolutionary thing that is not monocotyledonous does not hold.; sent14 -> int8: if that the Lota is both non-evolutionary and non-monocotyledonous is wrong it does embower worse.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Lota embowers worse.; sent13 -> int10: if the fact that the Lota does embower worse is not wrong then it is cryptanalytic.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the verapamil does not exhilarate minder.
sent16 & sent1 -> int11: the sprawler is non-evolutionary thing that does embower worse.; int11 -> int12: the sprawler does embower worse.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: the sprawler is monocotyledonous.; int13 -> int14: something is monocotyledonous.; int14 & sent18 -> int15: the Lota is an afferent but it is not a IIS.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is afferent and is not a IIS.;
$hypothesis$ = the Lota is not cryptanalytic. ; $context$ = sent1: the outwork is not cryptanalytic. sent2: if something does exhilarate minder then that the trefoil is both political and non-afferent is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something exhilarates minder is true then it is not cryptanalytic. sent4: the fact that the Lota is evolutionary thing that is not monocotyledonous is wrong. sent5: something that is ossicular is a carrier. sent6: the grissino embowers worse. sent7: the fact that the Lota is both not evolutionary and not non-monocotyledonous is wrong. sent8: the fact that the trefoil is not a kind of a IIS but it is monocotyledonous does not hold. sent9: if the fact that something is both not a bird and not a zygoma is not true it is untraceable. sent10: the fact that the Lota is both not evolutionary and not monocotyledonous is incorrect if the trefoil is not monocotyledonous. sent11: something is not a IIS if the fact that it is political and it is not an afferent is not correct. sent12: the sprawler is monocotyledonous if it embowers worse. sent13: something is cryptanalytic if it does embower worse. sent14: if that something is a kind of non-evolutionary thing that is not monocotyledonous is not right it embowers worse. sent15: something is political if it is an afferent. sent16: if the outwork is not cryptanalytic then the sprawler is not evolutionary but it does embower worse. sent17: something exhilarates minder. sent18: the Lota is both afferent and not a IIS if there exists something such that it is monocotyledonous. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent2 -> int1: that the trefoil is both political and not afferent is not right.; sent11 -> int2: that the trefoil is not a IIS is true if that it is political and it is not a kind of an afferent does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trefoil is not a IIS.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trefoil is monocotyledonous.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the trefoil is not a IIS but it is monocotyledonous.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the trefoil is not monocotyledonous.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the Lota is non-evolutionary thing that is not monocotyledonous does not hold.; sent14 -> int8: if that the Lota is both non-evolutionary and non-monocotyledonous is wrong it does embower worse.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the Lota embowers worse.; sent13 -> int10: if the fact that the Lota does embower worse is not wrong then it is cryptanalytic.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__