the fact that there exists something such that it is not digestible does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a shovel. sent2: there exists something such that it is digestible. sent3: that the trip is not the ruga if the trip does not group dhole is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that it is a ferrimagnetism. sent5: something does not differentiate if it is not photographic. sent6: if a cachectic thing is a ruga it is not a redact. sent7: the trip is cachectic. sent8: something is not digestible if it is not a redact. sent9: the sack is a kind of a ruga. sent10: there exists something such that it does pour Hesse. sent11: the trip is not digestible if it is not a shot. sent12: something that is a no-show is indigestible thing that is a kind of a redact. sent13: the trip does not consubstantiate. sent14: the trip is a ruga.
sent6 -> int1: the trip is not a kind of a redact if it is a kind of cachectic a ruga.; sent7 & sent14 -> int2: the trip is cachectic and it is a ruga.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trip is not a kind of a redact.; sent8 -> int4: if the trip is not a redact it is not digestible.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the trip is not digestible.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the carhop is cachectic.
sent12 -> int6: the gnetum is not digestible but it is a redact if the fact that it is a no-show is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is not digestible does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a shovel. sent2: there exists something such that it is digestible. sent3: that the trip is not the ruga if the trip does not group dhole is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that it is a ferrimagnetism. sent5: something does not differentiate if it is not photographic. sent6: if a cachectic thing is a ruga it is not a redact. sent7: the trip is cachectic. sent8: something is not digestible if it is not a redact. sent9: the sack is a kind of a ruga. sent10: there exists something such that it does pour Hesse. sent11: the trip is not digestible if it is not a shot. sent12: something that is a no-show is indigestible thing that is a kind of a redact. sent13: the trip does not consubstantiate. sent14: the trip is a ruga. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the trip is not a kind of a redact if it is a kind of cachectic a ruga.; sent7 & sent14 -> int2: the trip is cachectic and it is a ruga.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trip is not a kind of a redact.; sent8 -> int4: if the trip is not a redact it is not digestible.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the trip is not digestible.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__