the alkapton is clerical and it is neurophysiological.
sent1: the seafront is a kind of non-neurophysiological thing that does not sermonize finger-roll. sent2: the dihydrostreptomycin is non-clerical if that the crockery is continent is not false. sent3: the alkapton is clerical if the dihydrostreptomycin is not clerical. sent4: the crockery is uneager. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is a continent and/or it is clerical does not hold then the saiga is uneager. sent6: the saiga does not appear if there exists something such that that that it does not smatter and it is not immeasurable hold is not right. sent7: that the caragana is not incontinent or not non-clerical or both is false. sent8: there is something such that that it does smatter and is not immeasurable is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the fact that the dihydrostreptomycin is not clerical and it does not smatter is not wrong is not right. sent10: the alkapton is clerical and it is neurophysiological if the dihydrostreptomycin is not clerical. sent11: the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll if the saiga does not appear. sent12: if the saiga does not appear the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll and is eager. sent13: if something that does smatter is immeasurable then the seafront is not a Ford. sent14: the crockery is a continent if the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll and it is not uneager. sent15: if something is a Ford the fact that the seafront does not smatter and is not immeasurable is incorrect. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does smatter and is not immeasurable is wrong then the exit is cardiopulmonary. sent17: the exit does appear if there is something such that the fact that that it is not a Ford and does not appear is right is false. sent18: the alkapton is clerical. sent19: that something smatters but it is not immeasurable is wrong if it does not sermonize finger-roll. sent20: the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll. sent21: the crockery is a continent if the caragana does sermonize finger-roll and is not uneager. sent22: if there is something such that it is a Ford then the fact that the seafront smatters but it is non-immeasurable is false. sent23: that something is not a Ford and does not appear does not hold if it is uneager. sent24: there is something such that it does not smatter and is non-immeasurable. sent25: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Ford. sent26: the fact that the caragana sermonizes finger-roll and does not appear does not hold if the crockery is uneager.
sent25 & sent15 -> int1: that the seafront does not smatter and it is not immeasurable does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not smatter and is not immeasurable is wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the saiga does not appear.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll and it is not uneager.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the crockery is a continent.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the dihydrostreptomycin is not clerical.; sent10 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the alkapton is clerical and it is not non-neurophysiological is not right.
sent26 & sent4 -> int7: the fact that the caragana does sermonize finger-roll and does not appear is wrong.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it sermonizes finger-roll and does not appear is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the alkapton is clerical and it is neurophysiological. ; $context$ = sent1: the seafront is a kind of non-neurophysiological thing that does not sermonize finger-roll. sent2: the dihydrostreptomycin is non-clerical if that the crockery is continent is not false. sent3: the alkapton is clerical if the dihydrostreptomycin is not clerical. sent4: the crockery is uneager. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is a continent and/or it is clerical does not hold then the saiga is uneager. sent6: the saiga does not appear if there exists something such that that that it does not smatter and it is not immeasurable hold is not right. sent7: that the caragana is not incontinent or not non-clerical or both is false. sent8: there is something such that that it does smatter and is not immeasurable is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the fact that the dihydrostreptomycin is not clerical and it does not smatter is not wrong is not right. sent10: the alkapton is clerical and it is neurophysiological if the dihydrostreptomycin is not clerical. sent11: the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll if the saiga does not appear. sent12: if the saiga does not appear the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll and is eager. sent13: if something that does smatter is immeasurable then the seafront is not a Ford. sent14: the crockery is a continent if the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll and it is not uneager. sent15: if something is a Ford the fact that the seafront does not smatter and is not immeasurable is incorrect. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does smatter and is not immeasurable is wrong then the exit is cardiopulmonary. sent17: the exit does appear if there is something such that the fact that that it is not a Ford and does not appear is right is false. sent18: the alkapton is clerical. sent19: that something smatters but it is not immeasurable is wrong if it does not sermonize finger-roll. sent20: the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll. sent21: the crockery is a continent if the caragana does sermonize finger-roll and is not uneager. sent22: if there is something such that it is a Ford then the fact that the seafront smatters but it is non-immeasurable is false. sent23: that something is not a Ford and does not appear does not hold if it is uneager. sent24: there is something such that it does not smatter and is non-immeasurable. sent25: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Ford. sent26: the fact that the caragana sermonizes finger-roll and does not appear does not hold if the crockery is uneager. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 & sent15 -> int1: that the seafront does not smatter and it is not immeasurable does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it does not smatter and is not immeasurable is wrong.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the saiga does not appear.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the caragana does not sermonize finger-roll and it is not uneager.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the crockery is a continent.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the dihydrostreptomycin is not clerical.; sent10 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__