the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Hungarian does not hold the fact that it is not archidiaconal and it is not a kind of a bimillennium is false does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a Kodiak is right then the fact that it does not dwarf Gladstone and does not dwarf JI does not hold. sent2: if something is a bimillennium then the fact that it is not a pasty and does not interfere hogback is false. sent3: if the cardholder is a Hungarian then that it is not archidiaconal and it is not a bimillennium is false. sent4: there is something such that if that it is hair-shirt is not wrong then that it is not a kind of an engagement and it is not a kind of a boondoggle is not true. sent5: there is something such that if it is intramural then the fact that it does not muster and is not suppurative is false. sent6: there is something such that if it does ornament then the fact that it musters and it is not a mobile is incorrect. sent7: the cardholder is not archidiaconal and it is not a bimillennium if that it is a kind of a Hungarian is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it is configurational the fact that it is synchronic and is non-Liechtensteiner is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a fluctuation it is not imperfect and it is not syntactic. sent10: if that the cardholder is a rip hold then the fact that it does uplift cardholder and it is not archidiaconal is not true. sent11: the fact that the fence-sitter is not a kind of a sell but it is synchronic is not correct if it is subdural. sent12: that the fact that the cardholder is not noncombinative but it is the Colombian does not hold if that the cardholder is a kind of a mnemonics hold is not false.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
that the hay is not a pasty and it does not interfere hogback is wrong if it is a bimillennium.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Hungarian does not hold the fact that it is not archidiaconal and it is not a kind of a bimillennium is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a Kodiak is right then the fact that it does not dwarf Gladstone and does not dwarf JI does not hold. sent2: if something is a bimillennium then the fact that it is not a pasty and does not interfere hogback is false. sent3: if the cardholder is a Hungarian then that it is not archidiaconal and it is not a bimillennium is false. sent4: there is something such that if that it is hair-shirt is not wrong then that it is not a kind of an engagement and it is not a kind of a boondoggle is not true. sent5: there is something such that if it is intramural then the fact that it does not muster and is not suppurative is false. sent6: there is something such that if it does ornament then the fact that it musters and it is not a mobile is incorrect. sent7: the cardholder is not archidiaconal and it is not a bimillennium if that it is a kind of a Hungarian is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it is configurational the fact that it is synchronic and is non-Liechtensteiner is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a fluctuation it is not imperfect and it is not syntactic. sent10: if that the cardholder is a rip hold then the fact that it does uplift cardholder and it is not archidiaconal is not true. sent11: the fact that the fence-sitter is not a kind of a sell but it is synchronic is not correct if it is subdural. sent12: that the fact that the cardholder is not noncombinative but it is the Colombian does not hold if that the cardholder is a kind of a mnemonics hold is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__