the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Skuld and is auscultatory it is not whole is not wrong.
sent1: if a Skuld is auscultatory then it is whole. sent2: there exists something such that if it does deviate objection and it riots junket it does not riot Man. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of anabolic thing that is hidrotic that it does not harangue is correct. sent4: that something is not a kind of a Bahai is not incorrect if it is specific and it is a sepal. sent5: if the Man is a kind of a Skuld that is auscultatory then it is whole. sent6: something riots Man if it is fine and it riots pharmacopoeia. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a Skuld and it is auscultatory then it is a whole.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Skuld and is auscultatory it is not whole is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if a Skuld is auscultatory then it is whole. sent2: there exists something such that if it does deviate objection and it riots junket it does not riot Man. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of anabolic thing that is hidrotic that it does not harangue is correct. sent4: that something is not a kind of a Bahai is not incorrect if it is specific and it is a sepal. sent5: if the Man is a kind of a Skuld that is auscultatory then it is whole. sent6: something riots Man if it is fine and it riots pharmacopoeia. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a Skuld and it is auscultatory then it is a whole. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__