that the sponsorship happens and the liming creationism does not occur if that the conceptualization occurs hold is not true.
sent1: if the Prakriticness does not occur the acculturating does not occur. sent2: the tumult happens. sent3: the coursing occurs. sent4: either that the Prakriticness occurs or the conceptualization or both yields that the liming creationism does not occur. sent5: if the fact that that not the posting but the glorifying occurs is not wrong is incorrect then the glorifying does not occur. sent6: the fact that the Prakriticness occurs is not wrong. sent7: that the fact that the drilling occurs but the coursing does not occur is incorrect is not false if the fact that the glorifying happens is incorrect. sent8: if the lengthwiseness happens then the fact that the posting does not occur but the glorifying occurs is not true. sent9: both the sponsorship and the coursing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conceptualization occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the Prakriticness and/or the conceptualization happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the liming creationism does not occur.; sent9 -> int3: the sponsorship happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sponsorship but not the liming creationism happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the acculturating does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the sponsorship happens and the liming creationism does not occur if that the conceptualization occurs hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Prakriticness does not occur the acculturating does not occur. sent2: the tumult happens. sent3: the coursing occurs. sent4: either that the Prakriticness occurs or the conceptualization or both yields that the liming creationism does not occur. sent5: if the fact that that not the posting but the glorifying occurs is not wrong is incorrect then the glorifying does not occur. sent6: the fact that the Prakriticness occurs is not wrong. sent7: that the fact that the drilling occurs but the coursing does not occur is incorrect is not false if the fact that the glorifying happens is incorrect. sent8: if the lengthwiseness happens then the fact that the posting does not occur but the glorifying occurs is not true. sent9: both the sponsorship and the coursing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conceptualization occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the Prakriticness and/or the conceptualization happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the liming creationism does not occur.; sent9 -> int3: the sponsorship happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sponsorship but not the liming creationism happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__