that the yodeling or the fluoroscopy or both occurs does not hold.
sent1: if the silt happens the revenging occurs. sent2: the puzzle occurs if the coordination does not occur. sent3: if the narrowingness happens the erupting occurs. sent4: the coordination does not occur. sent5: the Britannicness happens if the tumult happens. sent6: that the tumult happens and the puzzling happens is caused by that the coordination does not occur. sent7: the quivering orlop does not occur. sent8: that the silting and the neuroticness happens is not correct. sent9: the ambushing synthetism and the rustlessness occurs. sent10: the fluoroscopy occurs if that the compromising methanol does not occur hold. sent11: both the accelerating vaudevillian and the accelerating Tosk occurs. sent12: the compromising sunrise does not occur. sent13: the compromising progestin happens. sent14: if both the nonfissionableness and the levorotation occurs then the forwarding does not occur. sent15: the nonfissionableness does not occur. sent16: the tread occurs. sent17: if that the silting does not occur but the neuroticness occurs does not hold then the revenging occurs. sent18: the puzzling occurs. sent19: the fact that the silting does not occur but the neurotic happens is wrong. sent20: the quivering thousandth occurs. sent21: that the Britannicness happens is prevented by that both the revenging and the compromising methanol happens. sent22: the Alpineness does not occur. sent23: the compromising stockpot does not occur.
sent17 & sent19 -> int1: the revenging happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the compromising methanol occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the revenging happens and the compromising methanol occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the Britannicness does not occur.; sent6 & sent4 -> int4: the tumult occurs and the puzzling occurs.; int4 -> int5: the tumult occurs.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the Britannicness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the compromising methanol does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the fluoroscopy occurs.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the yodeling and/or the fluoroscopy occurs is incorrect.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the yodeling or the fluoroscopy or both occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the silt happens the revenging occurs. sent2: the puzzle occurs if the coordination does not occur. sent3: if the narrowingness happens the erupting occurs. sent4: the coordination does not occur. sent5: the Britannicness happens if the tumult happens. sent6: that the tumult happens and the puzzling happens is caused by that the coordination does not occur. sent7: the quivering orlop does not occur. sent8: that the silting and the neuroticness happens is not correct. sent9: the ambushing synthetism and the rustlessness occurs. sent10: the fluoroscopy occurs if that the compromising methanol does not occur hold. sent11: both the accelerating vaudevillian and the accelerating Tosk occurs. sent12: the compromising sunrise does not occur. sent13: the compromising progestin happens. sent14: if both the nonfissionableness and the levorotation occurs then the forwarding does not occur. sent15: the nonfissionableness does not occur. sent16: the tread occurs. sent17: if that the silting does not occur but the neuroticness occurs does not hold then the revenging occurs. sent18: the puzzling occurs. sent19: the fact that the silting does not occur but the neurotic happens is wrong. sent20: the quivering thousandth occurs. sent21: that the Britannicness happens is prevented by that both the revenging and the compromising methanol happens. sent22: the Alpineness does not occur. sent23: the compromising stockpot does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent19 -> int1: the revenging happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the compromising methanol occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the revenging happens and the compromising methanol occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the Britannicness does not occur.; sent6 & sent4 -> int4: the tumult occurs and the puzzling occurs.; int4 -> int5: the tumult occurs.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the Britannicness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the compromising methanol does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the fluoroscopy occurs.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__