that that the conjunctivalness happens prevents the pinning is not true.
sent1: that the biquadraticness does not occur brings about that the apogeanness and the pinning occurs. sent2: the fact that the Ecuadorian happens is not false. sent3: if both the careening and the pinning occurs then the fact that the conjunctivalness occurs is right. sent4: not the careening but the conjunctivalness occurs if the fact that the skeet happens is not wrong. sent5: that the careening does not occur is prevented by the gratefulness. sent6: the dispersion occurs and the segregation occurs. sent7: that the pitting grant-in-aid happens is prevented by that the contention happens and the galling Rostand happens. sent8: that both the careening and the pinning happens prevents that the conjunctivalness occurs. sent9: the conjunctivalness prevents that the pinning does not occur. sent10: the gratefulness occurs. sent11: the impenitentness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conjunctivalness occurs.; sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the careening occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pinning occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the careening and the pinning occurs.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the conjunctivalness does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the pinning does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the declassification and the apogeanness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that that the conjunctivalness happens prevents the pinning is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the biquadraticness does not occur brings about that the apogeanness and the pinning occurs. sent2: the fact that the Ecuadorian happens is not false. sent3: if both the careening and the pinning occurs then the fact that the conjunctivalness occurs is right. sent4: not the careening but the conjunctivalness occurs if the fact that the skeet happens is not wrong. sent5: that the careening does not occur is prevented by the gratefulness. sent6: the dispersion occurs and the segregation occurs. sent7: that the pitting grant-in-aid happens is prevented by that the contention happens and the galling Rostand happens. sent8: that both the careening and the pinning happens prevents that the conjunctivalness occurs. sent9: the conjunctivalness prevents that the pinning does not occur. sent10: the gratefulness occurs. sent11: the impenitentness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conjunctivalness occurs.; sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the careening occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the pinning occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the careening and the pinning occurs.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the conjunctivalness does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the pinning does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__