there is something such that if it does not sparkle brainworker then the fact that it is Slavonic and/or it is a Sotho is not correct.
sent1: that something is a microphoning and/or it is harsh is not correct if it does not compact Serkin. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not sparkle brainworker it is not Slavonic. sent3: that the parasol is either Slavonic or a Sotho or both does not hold if it does sparkle brainworker. sent4: the parasol is Slavonic and/or a Sotho if it does not sparkle brainworker. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not bounded the fact that it is curable or it is mini or both is wrong. sent6: that something sparkles sensorium or is nonmetallic or both is incorrect if it is not exergonic. sent7: the parasol is not a Sotho if it does not sparkle brainworker. sent8: there is something such that if it does not drown that it is a kind of a microphoning or is a Synge or both is not right. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not sparkle brainworker then it either is Slavonic or is a Sotho or both. sent10: there is something such that if it does not sparkle brainworker that it is not a Sotho hold. sent11: the fact that the brainworker is a thrombectomy and/or it is mini does not hold if it is not exergonic. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of an invalid is not false it is a sherbert and/or it is a kind of a citronwood. sent13: if the parasol does not sparkle brainworker then the fact that that it is Slavonic or a Sotho or both hold is not right. sent14: that either something is factual or it is a ponytail or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a steprelationship. sent15: there is something such that if it sparkles brainworker then that either it is Slavonic or it is Sotho or both does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if that it is not bacteremic hold that it is a bombardment or a trace or both does not hold.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not exergonic then the fact that it either does sparkle sensorium or is nonmetallic or both is wrong.
sent6 -> int1: if the White is not exergonic the fact that it does sparkle sensorium and/or it is nonmetallic is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not sparkle brainworker then the fact that it is Slavonic and/or it is a Sotho is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a microphoning and/or it is harsh is not correct if it does not compact Serkin. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not sparkle brainworker it is not Slavonic. sent3: that the parasol is either Slavonic or a Sotho or both does not hold if it does sparkle brainworker. sent4: the parasol is Slavonic and/or a Sotho if it does not sparkle brainworker. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not bounded the fact that it is curable or it is mini or both is wrong. sent6: that something sparkles sensorium or is nonmetallic or both is incorrect if it is not exergonic. sent7: the parasol is not a Sotho if it does not sparkle brainworker. sent8: there is something such that if it does not drown that it is a kind of a microphoning or is a Synge or both is not right. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not sparkle brainworker then it either is Slavonic or is a Sotho or both. sent10: there is something such that if it does not sparkle brainworker that it is not a Sotho hold. sent11: the fact that the brainworker is a thrombectomy and/or it is mini does not hold if it is not exergonic. sent12: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of an invalid is not false it is a sherbert and/or it is a kind of a citronwood. sent13: if the parasol does not sparkle brainworker then the fact that that it is Slavonic or a Sotho or both hold is not right. sent14: that either something is factual or it is a ponytail or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a steprelationship. sent15: there is something such that if it sparkles brainworker then that either it is Slavonic or it is Sotho or both does not hold. sent16: there is something such that if that it is not bacteremic hold that it is a bombardment or a trace or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__