the fact that there exists something such that that it does not talk Papilionaceae and is not a lasagna does not hold is wrong.
sent1: the Ephesians is a hypnotherapy if there exists something such that it does not chauffeur and does not talk peonage. sent2: that the electrologist is bolometric is right if it greens. sent3: the anesthyl is not bolometric if that that the electrologist is not bolometric but it blames clothesline is false is not wrong. sent4: if the Ephesians is a apodeme the bagatelle does not crank code and it does not crank Wesleyan. sent5: that the escapist is bolometric and does not talk Papilionaceae is not right. sent6: the macule is not a kind of a chauffeur and does not talk peonage if there is something such that it is not cupric. sent7: there is something such that it is not congeneric. sent8: the fact that the fact that something is not a Cartesian and does fool electrologist is true is not true if it is a hypnotherapy. sent9: the fact that the electrologist is not bolometric but it blames clothesline is not right if something does not blames clothesline. sent10: the review is not uncleared and it is not cupric if something is not a kind of a Cynoscion. sent11: if that something is not a kind of a Cartesian and fools electrologist is wrong then it is a apodeme. sent12: that the escapist does talk Papilionaceae but it is not a kind of a lasagna is wrong. sent13: the electrologist does green. sent14: the escapist does not talk Papilionaceae. sent15: the escapist is not bolometric and it does not talk Papilionaceae. sent16: the escapist does not talk Papilionaceae if there is something such that it is a kind of a lasagna and is non-greens. sent17: there exists something such that that it is not an adobe and it is a cable is wrong. sent18: something that does not crank code and does not crank Wesleyan does not blame clothesline. sent19: something is not a kind of a Cynoscion. sent20: if something that does not talk Papilionaceae is not a kind of a lasagna the electrologist is not bolometric. sent21: there are non-greens things. sent22: the coalbin is not greens. sent23: the fact that something is not a kind of a rocambole and does not green is wrong if it is not bolometric.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the escapist does not talk Papilionaceae and is not a lasagna.; assump1 -> int1: something does not talk Papilionaceae and it is not a lasagna.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the electrologist is not bolometric.; sent2 & sent13 -> int3: the electrologist is bolometric.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the escapist does not talk Papilionaceae and it is not a lasagna is not right.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the anesthyl is not a rocambole and is not greens is not correct.
sent23 -> int6: the fact that that the anesthyl is not a kind of a rocambole and does not green is not incorrect is not right if it is not bolometric.; sent18 -> int7: the bagatelle does not blame clothesline if it does not crank code and does not crank Wesleyan.; sent11 -> int8: the Ephesians is a apodeme if that it is not a Cartesian and does fool electrologist is incorrect.; sent8 -> int9: that the Ephesians is not Cartesian but it fools electrologist does not hold if it is a hypnotherapy.; sent19 & sent10 -> int10: the review is not uncleared and is not cupric.; int10 -> int11: the review is not cupric.; int11 -> int12: something is not cupric.; int12 & sent6 -> int13: the macule does not chauffeur and does not talk peonage.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that that it is not a chauffeur and it does not talk peonage hold.; int14 & sent1 -> int15: the Ephesians is a hypnotherapy.; int9 & int15 -> int16: that the Ephesians is not a kind of a Cartesian but it fools electrologist is not right.; int8 & int16 -> int17: the Ephesians is a kind of a apodeme.; sent4 & int17 -> int18: the bagatelle does not crank code and it does not crank Wesleyan.; int7 & int18 -> int19: the bagatelle does not blame clothesline.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that it does not blame clothesline.; int20 & sent9 -> int21: that the electrologist is non-bolometric thing that does blame clothesline is not correct.; sent3 & int21 -> int22: the anesthyl is not bolometric.; int6 & int22 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it does not talk Papilionaceae and is not a lasagna does not hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Ephesians is a hypnotherapy if there exists something such that it does not chauffeur and does not talk peonage. sent2: that the electrologist is bolometric is right if it greens. sent3: the anesthyl is not bolometric if that that the electrologist is not bolometric but it blames clothesline is false is not wrong. sent4: if the Ephesians is a apodeme the bagatelle does not crank code and it does not crank Wesleyan. sent5: that the escapist is bolometric and does not talk Papilionaceae is not right. sent6: the macule is not a kind of a chauffeur and does not talk peonage if there is something such that it is not cupric. sent7: there is something such that it is not congeneric. sent8: the fact that the fact that something is not a Cartesian and does fool electrologist is true is not true if it is a hypnotherapy. sent9: the fact that the electrologist is not bolometric but it blames clothesline is not right if something does not blames clothesline. sent10: the review is not uncleared and it is not cupric if something is not a kind of a Cynoscion. sent11: if that something is not a kind of a Cartesian and fools electrologist is wrong then it is a apodeme. sent12: that the escapist does talk Papilionaceae but it is not a kind of a lasagna is wrong. sent13: the electrologist does green. sent14: the escapist does not talk Papilionaceae. sent15: the escapist is not bolometric and it does not talk Papilionaceae. sent16: the escapist does not talk Papilionaceae if there is something such that it is a kind of a lasagna and is non-greens. sent17: there exists something such that that it is not an adobe and it is a cable is wrong. sent18: something that does not crank code and does not crank Wesleyan does not blame clothesline. sent19: something is not a kind of a Cynoscion. sent20: if something that does not talk Papilionaceae is not a kind of a lasagna the electrologist is not bolometric. sent21: there are non-greens things. sent22: the coalbin is not greens. sent23: the fact that something is not a kind of a rocambole and does not green is wrong if it is not bolometric. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the escapist does not talk Papilionaceae and is not a lasagna.; assump1 -> int1: something does not talk Papilionaceae and it is not a lasagna.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the electrologist is not bolometric.; sent2 & sent13 -> int3: the electrologist is bolometric.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the escapist does not talk Papilionaceae and it is not a lasagna is not right.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__