the closet does not wait and it is not a kind of a inwardness.
sent1: if something is not legible that that it is both not a wait and not a inwardness is correct does not hold. sent2: if the Protestant is a Teredinidae then the closet is not a wait and it is not a inwardness. sent3: the impala is a Kleenex if the fact that the desktop is not a kind of a blinded and does not resent seller does not hold. sent4: that the fact that the desktop does not blind and does not resent seller does not hold is not wrong if it is legible. sent5: if something is a kind of illegible thing that does not unclutter then it is a kind of a Teredinidae. sent6: if the impala is a Kleenex the rice does not resent Bhaga. sent7: if the desktop is not legible the Protestant is a kind of legible thing that does not unclutter. sent8: if there exists something such that it is hydric the rice does resent Bhaga and does not mop. sent9: the dinoflagellate is hydric.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the desktop is legible.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the desktop does not blind and does not resent seller is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the impala is a kind of a Kleenex.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the rice does not resent Bhaga.; sent9 -> int4: there exists something such that it is hydric.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the rice resents Bhaga and does not mop.; int5 -> int6: the rice resents Bhaga.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the desktop is not legible.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the Protestant is a kind of illegible thing that does not unclutter.; sent5 -> int10: the Protestant is a kind of a Teredinidae if it is not legible and it does not unclutter.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Protestant is a Teredinidae.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the closet does not wait and it is not a inwardness does not hold.
sent1 -> int12: if the closet is not legible that it is both not a wait and not a inwardness is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the closet does not wait and it is not a kind of a inwardness. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not legible that that it is both not a wait and not a inwardness is correct does not hold. sent2: if the Protestant is a Teredinidae then the closet is not a wait and it is not a inwardness. sent3: the impala is a Kleenex if the fact that the desktop is not a kind of a blinded and does not resent seller does not hold. sent4: that the fact that the desktop does not blind and does not resent seller does not hold is not wrong if it is legible. sent5: if something is a kind of illegible thing that does not unclutter then it is a kind of a Teredinidae. sent6: if the impala is a Kleenex the rice does not resent Bhaga. sent7: if the desktop is not legible the Protestant is a kind of legible thing that does not unclutter. sent8: if there exists something such that it is hydric the rice does resent Bhaga and does not mop. sent9: the dinoflagellate is hydric. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the desktop is legible.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the desktop does not blind and does not resent seller is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the impala is a kind of a Kleenex.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the rice does not resent Bhaga.; sent9 -> int4: there exists something such that it is hydric.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the rice resents Bhaga and does not mop.; int5 -> int6: the rice resents Bhaga.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the desktop is not legible.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the Protestant is a kind of illegible thing that does not unclutter.; sent5 -> int10: the Protestant is a kind of a Teredinidae if it is not legible and it does not unclutter.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the Protestant is a Teredinidae.; int11 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__