the fondler does not dogmatize checker.
sent1: that if there is something such that it is fatty and it is a overcredulity then the fondler does dogmatize checker hold. sent2: the fact that the retrenchment does not irradiate but it is fatty is true if the coccyx irradiate. sent3: the checker is a masquerader if something does not irradiate and does complexion. sent4: the bagatelle staples focused and is a Isis. sent5: something does not irradiate. sent6: the retrenchment does not irradiate. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is abasic is not wrong. sent8: the bagatelle is a masquerader if the retrenchment does dogmatize ouster. sent9: the fact that the retrenchment is virulent is true. sent10: the retrenchment does dogmatize checker. sent11: if something that is fatty does dogmatize ouster the fact that the retrenchment is a masquerader is not wrong. sent12: that something is a kind of a complexion that is fatty is false if it is not a overcredulity. sent13: the coccyx is fatty if there is something such that it is not a masquerader but a complexion. sent14: if the bagatelle is a masquerader the checker is not a masquerader and does complexion. sent15: the retrenchment dogmatizes ouster if it does not irradiate. sent16: if the coccyx is not fatty it does dogmatize checker. sent17: something does irradiate or does not dogmatize ouster or both if it is not a kind of a masquerader. sent18: the coccyx is a overcredulity. sent19: there is something such that it acquaints ventilator. sent20: the checker complexions if there exists something such that it does dogmatize checker and does dogmatize ouster. sent21: the fondler is a complexion. sent22: something is not a overcredulity if it does staple focused and is a kind of a Isis.
sent15 & sent6 -> int1: the retrenchment dogmatizes ouster.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the bagatelle is a kind of a masquerader.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the checker is not a masquerader and does complexion.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a masquerader and it complexions.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the coccyx is fatty.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the coccyx is fatty and it is a kind of a overcredulity.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a kind of fatty thing that is a overcredulity.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fondler does not dogmatize checker.
sent17 -> int8: if the fact that the retrenchment is not a masquerader is not false it irradiates and/or does not dogmatize ouster.; sent12 -> int9: the fact that that the bagatelle is a complexion and it is fatty is not correct is not incorrect if it is not a overcredulity.; sent22 -> int10: if the bagatelle staples focused and is a Isis then it is not a overcredulity.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the bagatelle is not a overcredulity.; int9 & int11 -> int12: that the bagatelle is both a complexion and not non-fatty is not correct.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it complexions and is fatty is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fondler does not dogmatize checker. ; $context$ = sent1: that if there is something such that it is fatty and it is a overcredulity then the fondler does dogmatize checker hold. sent2: the fact that the retrenchment does not irradiate but it is fatty is true if the coccyx irradiate. sent3: the checker is a masquerader if something does not irradiate and does complexion. sent4: the bagatelle staples focused and is a Isis. sent5: something does not irradiate. sent6: the retrenchment does not irradiate. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is abasic is not wrong. sent8: the bagatelle is a masquerader if the retrenchment does dogmatize ouster. sent9: the fact that the retrenchment is virulent is true. sent10: the retrenchment does dogmatize checker. sent11: if something that is fatty does dogmatize ouster the fact that the retrenchment is a masquerader is not wrong. sent12: that something is a kind of a complexion that is fatty is false if it is not a overcredulity. sent13: the coccyx is fatty if there is something such that it is not a masquerader but a complexion. sent14: if the bagatelle is a masquerader the checker is not a masquerader and does complexion. sent15: the retrenchment dogmatizes ouster if it does not irradiate. sent16: if the coccyx is not fatty it does dogmatize checker. sent17: something does irradiate or does not dogmatize ouster or both if it is not a kind of a masquerader. sent18: the coccyx is a overcredulity. sent19: there is something such that it acquaints ventilator. sent20: the checker complexions if there exists something such that it does dogmatize checker and does dogmatize ouster. sent21: the fondler is a complexion. sent22: something is not a overcredulity if it does staple focused and is a kind of a Isis. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent6 -> int1: the retrenchment dogmatizes ouster.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the bagatelle is a kind of a masquerader.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the checker is not a masquerader and does complexion.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a masquerader and it complexions.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the coccyx is fatty.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the coccyx is fatty and it is a kind of a overcredulity.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a kind of fatty thing that is a overcredulity.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__