the MVP does not forage historicism but it is acetylic.
sent1: the Elamite is both not a blogger and a parodist if the overlord is not a parodist. sent2: everything is not a blogger. sent3: the fact that if something is sturdy then that it does not forage historicism and is acetylic is false is correct. sent4: that something is not a parodist but it heels overlord if it is sturdy is not incorrect. sent5: if the kraft is not acetylic then the MVP is acetylic. sent6: the MVP is both not sturdy and acetylic. sent7: the overlord heels overlord if it is sturdy. sent8: everything is not a Kreisler and not a blogger. sent9: something heels overlord if it is sturdy. sent10: that everything is not unchangeable is not false. sent11: the overlord is sturdy if the Elamite is not a Kreisler and it is not a kind of a blogger. sent12: the overlord is not non-sturdy if the Elamite is not a Kreisler but it is a blogger. sent13: the Elamite is not a blogger. sent14: the MVP is not non-acetylic. sent15: if the kraft is not acetylic then the MVP does not forage historicism but it is acetylic.
sent8 -> int1: the Elamite is not a Kreisler and is not a blogger.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the overlord is sturdy.; sent4 -> int3: the overlord is not a parodist but it does heel overlord if it is sturdy.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the overlord is not a parodist but it heels overlord.;
the fact that the fact that the MVP does not forage historicism and is acetylic is right is not correct.
sent3 -> int5: if the MVP is sturdy then the fact that it does not forage historicism and is acetylic is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the MVP does not forage historicism but it is acetylic. ; $context$ = sent1: the Elamite is both not a blogger and a parodist if the overlord is not a parodist. sent2: everything is not a blogger. sent3: the fact that if something is sturdy then that it does not forage historicism and is acetylic is false is correct. sent4: that something is not a parodist but it heels overlord if it is sturdy is not incorrect. sent5: if the kraft is not acetylic then the MVP is acetylic. sent6: the MVP is both not sturdy and acetylic. sent7: the overlord heels overlord if it is sturdy. sent8: everything is not a Kreisler and not a blogger. sent9: something heels overlord if it is sturdy. sent10: that everything is not unchangeable is not false. sent11: the overlord is sturdy if the Elamite is not a Kreisler and it is not a kind of a blogger. sent12: the overlord is not non-sturdy if the Elamite is not a Kreisler but it is a blogger. sent13: the Elamite is not a blogger. sent14: the MVP is not non-acetylic. sent15: if the kraft is not acetylic then the MVP does not forage historicism but it is acetylic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the Elamite is not a Kreisler and is not a blogger.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the overlord is sturdy.; sent4 -> int3: the overlord is not a parodist but it does heel overlord if it is sturdy.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the overlord is not a parodist but it heels overlord.; __UNKNOWN__