the instrumentalness does not occur.
sent1: if the exsiccating mendacity occurs the indiscretion happens. sent2: the bismuthicness triggers the exsiccating mendacity. sent3: the curb happens. sent4: the refracting is caused by that the constitutionalness occurs. sent5: that the attack occurs prevents the non-instrumentalness. sent6: the fact that the attacking occurs but the indiscretion does not occur is wrong if the rapping Megapodius happens. sent7: the bismuthicness occurs. sent8: if the churning isomorphism happens the Terpsichore occurs. sent9: that the churning antitype happens is caused by the squaring. sent10: the dissolve happens. sent11: the attacking occurs if that the indiscretion occurs is correct.
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the exsiccating mendacity occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the indiscretion happens.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the attack happens.; sent5 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the instrumentalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the instrumentalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the exsiccating mendacity occurs the indiscretion happens. sent2: the bismuthicness triggers the exsiccating mendacity. sent3: the curb happens. sent4: the refracting is caused by that the constitutionalness occurs. sent5: that the attack occurs prevents the non-instrumentalness. sent6: the fact that the attacking occurs but the indiscretion does not occur is wrong if the rapping Megapodius happens. sent7: the bismuthicness occurs. sent8: if the churning isomorphism happens the Terpsichore occurs. sent9: that the churning antitype happens is caused by the squaring. sent10: the dissolve happens. sent11: the attacking occurs if that the indiscretion occurs is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the exsiccating mendacity occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the indiscretion happens.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the attack happens.; sent5 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__