either the peg is not geriatrics or it is not a restrictiveness or both if the declension is a scandalization.
sent1: the peg is geriatrics and/or it is not a kind of a restrictiveness if the salad is not a kind of a restrictiveness. sent2: the declension is not a scandalization if the bookmark is nonpasserine but it does not chasten countersubversion. sent3: the notepad is Honduran. sent4: that that the declension is a fielder but it is not a kind of a scandalization is right is wrong. sent5: the declension does not chasten countersubversion. sent6: if the salad is not a restrictiveness the peg is not geriatrics or it is a kind of a restrictiveness or both. sent7: something is not Honduran if it chastens countersubversion. sent8: the salad is a restrictiveness and/or not a scandalization if the declension is nonpasserine. sent9: the peg is not geriatrics or it is not a kind of a restrictiveness or both if the salad is not a restrictiveness. sent10: the declension is not a tor and is not taciturn. sent11: the peg is not a scandalization. sent12: if the ferromagnetism does not rehabilitate bargello and is not a tor the salad is not a restrictiveness. sent13: the salad is not nonpasserine if the bookmark is not a kind of a restrictiveness and it is not a scandalization. sent14: if the salad does not rehabilitate bargello the peg is not a kind of a restrictiveness. sent15: the bookmark does rehabilitate bargello and does not chasten countersubversion. sent16: if the bookmark is not Honduran then the ferromagnetism does not rehabilitate bargello and is not a tor. sent17: the bookmark is not nonpasserine or it is not a restrictiveness or both. sent18: if the bookmark is not a kind of a restrictiveness the salad is not a Honduran or is not a kind of a restrictiveness or both. sent19: the ferromagnetism is a kind of a Honduran and/or it is not a tor if the bookmark is a kind of a restrictiveness. sent20: the peg is not nonpasserine and is not a kind of a Honduran if that the bookmark is not a restrictiveness is true. sent21: if the ferromagnetism does not rehabilitate bargello and is a kind of a tor the salad is not a restrictiveness. sent22: the peg is geriatrics thing that does not rehabilitate bargello. sent23: that the bookmark does not labor nondescript hold. sent24: something is not Honduran if that it is nonpasserine and does not chasten countersubversion is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bookmark is nonpasserine but it does not chasten countersubversion.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the declension is not a scandalization.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the declension is a kind of a scandalization.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the bookmark is nonpasserine thing that does not chasten countersubversion is false.; sent24 -> int4: the bookmark is not Honduran if that it is nonpasserine thing that does not chasten countersubversion is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the bookmark is non-Honduran is correct.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the ferromagnetism does not rehabilitate bargello and is not a tor.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: that the salad is not a kind of a restrictiveness is not wrong.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the peg is not geriatrics and/or it is not a kind of a restrictiveness.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = either the peg is not geriatrics or it is not a restrictiveness or both if the declension is a scandalization. ; $context$ = sent1: the peg is geriatrics and/or it is not a kind of a restrictiveness if the salad is not a kind of a restrictiveness. sent2: the declension is not a scandalization if the bookmark is nonpasserine but it does not chasten countersubversion. sent3: the notepad is Honduran. sent4: that that the declension is a fielder but it is not a kind of a scandalization is right is wrong. sent5: the declension does not chasten countersubversion. sent6: if the salad is not a restrictiveness the peg is not geriatrics or it is a kind of a restrictiveness or both. sent7: something is not Honduran if it chastens countersubversion. sent8: the salad is a restrictiveness and/or not a scandalization if the declension is nonpasserine. sent9: the peg is not geriatrics or it is not a kind of a restrictiveness or both if the salad is not a restrictiveness. sent10: the declension is not a tor and is not taciturn. sent11: the peg is not a scandalization. sent12: if the ferromagnetism does not rehabilitate bargello and is not a tor the salad is not a restrictiveness. sent13: the salad is not nonpasserine if the bookmark is not a kind of a restrictiveness and it is not a scandalization. sent14: if the salad does not rehabilitate bargello the peg is not a kind of a restrictiveness. sent15: the bookmark does rehabilitate bargello and does not chasten countersubversion. sent16: if the bookmark is not Honduran then the ferromagnetism does not rehabilitate bargello and is not a tor. sent17: the bookmark is not nonpasserine or it is not a restrictiveness or both. sent18: if the bookmark is not a kind of a restrictiveness the salad is not a Honduran or is not a kind of a restrictiveness or both. sent19: the ferromagnetism is a kind of a Honduran and/or it is not a tor if the bookmark is a kind of a restrictiveness. sent20: the peg is not nonpasserine and is not a kind of a Honduran if that the bookmark is not a restrictiveness is true. sent21: if the ferromagnetism does not rehabilitate bargello and is a kind of a tor the salad is not a restrictiveness. sent22: the peg is geriatrics thing that does not rehabilitate bargello. sent23: that the bookmark does not labor nondescript hold. sent24: something is not Honduran if that it is nonpasserine and does not chasten countersubversion is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bookmark is nonpasserine but it does not chasten countersubversion.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the declension is not a scandalization.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the declension is a kind of a scandalization.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the bookmark is nonpasserine thing that does not chasten countersubversion is false.; sent24 -> int4: the bookmark is not Honduran if that it is nonpasserine thing that does not chasten countersubversion is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the bookmark is non-Honduran is correct.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the ferromagnetism does not rehabilitate bargello and is not a tor.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: that the salad is not a kind of a restrictiveness is not wrong.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the peg is not geriatrics and/or it is not a kind of a restrictiveness.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__