that the quartanness is prevented by that the subclinicalness happens is not true.
sent1: if the subclinicalness occurs then the quartanness occurs. sent2: that the pro occurs is true. sent3: the paleoanthropologicalness happens. sent4: both the generaling and the paleoanthropologicalness occurs. sent5: the walk-through does not occur. sent6: if the quartan occurs and the generalness happens then the subclinicalness happens. sent7: the non-subclinicalness is brought about by that both the quartanness and the general happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subclinicalness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the quartanness occurs is not incorrect.; sent4 -> int1: the general occurs.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: the quartan occurs and the generalness happens.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the subclinicalness does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the quartanness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the quartanness is prevented by that the subclinicalness happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the subclinicalness occurs then the quartanness occurs. sent2: that the pro occurs is true. sent3: the paleoanthropologicalness happens. sent4: both the generaling and the paleoanthropologicalness occurs. sent5: the walk-through does not occur. sent6: if the quartan occurs and the generalness happens then the subclinicalness happens. sent7: the non-subclinicalness is brought about by that both the quartanness and the general happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subclinicalness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the quartanness occurs is not incorrect.; sent4 -> int1: the general occurs.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: the quartan occurs and the generalness happens.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the subclinicalness does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the quartanness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__