the fact that that the insideness does not occur and the lignifying does not occur is brought about by that the dimming reverie does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the incitement does not occur if the dimming Cannaceae does not occur and the rest-cure does not occur. sent2: the causing does not occur. sent3: if that the dimming reverie occurs is right the tricing porkholt does not occur and the dimming titanosaur does not occur. sent4: the disappearing occurs if the cause does not occur. sent5: if the disappearing happens then the lignifying does not occur and the Handelianness does not occur. sent6: if the dimming titanosaur does not occur the occulting depletion does not occur. sent7: the lucifugousness does not occur. sent8: if the tricing glebe occurs the trawling does not occur. sent9: that the dimming titanosaur occurs but the dimming reverie does not occur is not right. sent10: that the insideness happens is prevented by that the occulting depletion does not occur and the lucifugousness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dimming titanosaur occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dimming reverie does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the dimming titanosaur but not the dimming reverie occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the dimming titanosaur does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the occulting depletion does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: that the occulting depletion does not occur and the lucifugousness does not occur hold.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the insideness does not occur.; sent4 & sent2 -> int7: the disappearing occurs.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the lignifying does not occur and the Handelianness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the lignifying does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the inside does not occur and the lignifying does not occur.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the tricing porkholt does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the insideness does not occur and the lignifying does not occur is brought about by that the dimming reverie does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the incitement does not occur if the dimming Cannaceae does not occur and the rest-cure does not occur. sent2: the causing does not occur. sent3: if that the dimming reverie occurs is right the tricing porkholt does not occur and the dimming titanosaur does not occur. sent4: the disappearing occurs if the cause does not occur. sent5: if the disappearing happens then the lignifying does not occur and the Handelianness does not occur. sent6: if the dimming titanosaur does not occur the occulting depletion does not occur. sent7: the lucifugousness does not occur. sent8: if the tricing glebe occurs the trawling does not occur. sent9: that the dimming titanosaur occurs but the dimming reverie does not occur is not right. sent10: that the insideness happens is prevented by that the occulting depletion does not occur and the lucifugousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dimming titanosaur occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the dimming reverie does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the dimming titanosaur but not the dimming reverie occurs.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the dimming titanosaur does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the occulting depletion does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: that the occulting depletion does not occur and the lucifugousness does not occur hold.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the insideness does not occur.; sent4 & sent2 -> int7: the disappearing occurs.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the lignifying does not occur and the Handelianness does not occur.; int8 -> int9: the lignifying does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the inside does not occur and the lignifying does not occur.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__