the allogeneicness or the buffoonery or both happens.
sent1: that the spinal and the vitreousness occurs is caused by the non-spectrometricness. sent2: the micaceousness happens. sent3: the non-tensedness leads to that the susceptibleness happens or the thalamocorticalness occurs or both. sent4: the taming produce occurs. sent5: the taming Coraciidae happens. sent6: that not the yielding but the micaceousness occurs is triggered by that the vitreousness happens. sent7: the allogeneicness and/or the buffoonery occurs if the yield does not occur. sent8: the fact that the allogeneicness happens and/or the buffoonery occurs does not hold if the analness does not occur. sent9: that the yield does not occur is triggered by that the analness happens and the micaceousness happens.
the fact that the allogeneicness happens and/or the buffoonery happens is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the allogeneicness or the buffoonery or both happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the spinal and the vitreousness occurs is caused by the non-spectrometricness. sent2: the micaceousness happens. sent3: the non-tensedness leads to that the susceptibleness happens or the thalamocorticalness occurs or both. sent4: the taming produce occurs. sent5: the taming Coraciidae happens. sent6: that not the yielding but the micaceousness occurs is triggered by that the vitreousness happens. sent7: the allogeneicness and/or the buffoonery occurs if the yield does not occur. sent8: the fact that the allogeneicness happens and/or the buffoonery occurs does not hold if the analness does not occur. sent9: that the yield does not occur is triggered by that the analness happens and the micaceousness happens. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__