the V is not a Kentucky.
sent1: if the memorizer is a kind of a checkered that the amoralist is not a hymeneal is right. sent2: something is a kind of a vomit and it galls glued if it is not a backing. sent3: the amoralist does not gall gauge if the fact that it is not expedient is wrong. sent4: if the broad-bean is a kind of a vomit then the PVA is a vomit. sent5: the amoralist does not gall gauge. sent6: the amoralist is not inexpedient if it is not non-hymeneal but a bedlamite. sent7: if the memorizer is not a checkered the PVA does not gall glued and is not a checkered. sent8: if the amoralist is non-hymeneal thing that is a kind of a bedlamite it is not inexpedient. sent9: if the amoralist is not inexpedient it is not a vomit and it does not gall gauge. sent10: the amoralist is a kind of a checkered if the PVA is inexpedient. sent11: the fact that the broad-bean is not backing is not wrong if it disobliges neigh and is not a kind of a machilid. sent12: the V is a Kentucky if the fact that the memorizer is a Kentucky is not incorrect. sent13: the V is not a Kentucky if the PVA does not gall glued and it is not a kind of a checkered. sent14: the amoralist is not a kind of a hymeneal but it is a kind of a bedlamite if the memorizer is a kind of a checkered. sent15: if the memorizer is not a checkered then the PVA does not gall glued. sent16: that the amoralist is not a vomit and does not gall gauge is false. sent17: that the amoralist is not a vomit but it galls gauge does not hold. sent18: if the broad-bean is disloyal then it does disoblige neigh and it is not a kind of a machilid. sent19: if the amoralist checkers then the memorizer is a Kentucky. sent20: something is inexpedient if it does gall gauge. sent21: the PVA does not gall glued.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the memorizer is a checkered.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the amoralist is not hymeneal but it is a bedlamite.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the amoralist is not inexpedient.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the amoralist does not vomit and does not gall gauge.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the memorizer is not a checkered.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the PVA does not gall glued and is not a kind of a checkered is true.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the V is a Kentucky.
sent20 -> int7: if the PVA does gall gauge then it is inexpedient.; sent2 -> int8: the broad-bean does vomit and galls glued if it is not a kind of a backing.;
$hypothesis$ = the V is not a Kentucky. ; $context$ = sent1: if the memorizer is a kind of a checkered that the amoralist is not a hymeneal is right. sent2: something is a kind of a vomit and it galls glued if it is not a backing. sent3: the amoralist does not gall gauge if the fact that it is not expedient is wrong. sent4: if the broad-bean is a kind of a vomit then the PVA is a vomit. sent5: the amoralist does not gall gauge. sent6: the amoralist is not inexpedient if it is not non-hymeneal but a bedlamite. sent7: if the memorizer is not a checkered the PVA does not gall glued and is not a checkered. sent8: if the amoralist is non-hymeneal thing that is a kind of a bedlamite it is not inexpedient. sent9: if the amoralist is not inexpedient it is not a vomit and it does not gall gauge. sent10: the amoralist is a kind of a checkered if the PVA is inexpedient. sent11: the fact that the broad-bean is not backing is not wrong if it disobliges neigh and is not a kind of a machilid. sent12: the V is a Kentucky if the fact that the memorizer is a Kentucky is not incorrect. sent13: the V is not a Kentucky if the PVA does not gall glued and it is not a kind of a checkered. sent14: the amoralist is not a kind of a hymeneal but it is a kind of a bedlamite if the memorizer is a kind of a checkered. sent15: if the memorizer is not a checkered then the PVA does not gall glued. sent16: that the amoralist is not a vomit and does not gall gauge is false. sent17: that the amoralist is not a vomit but it galls gauge does not hold. sent18: if the broad-bean is disloyal then it does disoblige neigh and it is not a kind of a machilid. sent19: if the amoralist checkers then the memorizer is a Kentucky. sent20: something is inexpedient if it does gall gauge. sent21: the PVA does not gall glued. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the memorizer is a checkered.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the amoralist is not hymeneal but it is a bedlamite.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the amoralist is not inexpedient.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the amoralist does not vomit and does not gall gauge.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the memorizer is not a checkered.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the PVA does not gall glued and is not a kind of a checkered is true.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__