the Hebraist is not a metaproterenol.
sent1: if the Ojibwa is a metaproterenol then the Hebraist is a metaproterenol. sent2: the fact that the kelp does bunk outthrust and does not acquaint pickings does not hold. sent3: if the grama acquaints biquadratic it staples kelp. sent4: if the grama is a kind of a imaret and it is critical then it does acquaint biquadratic. sent5: that the Ojibwa does not acquaint pickings and it does not bunk outthrust is not correct if the grama staples kelp. sent6: that that the Ojibwa acquaints pickings but it does not bunk outthrust is not correct hold. sent7: if something is a kind of a imaret but it is not critical then it does acquaint biquadratic. sent8: if something does not bunk outthrust then it does staple kelp and acquaints biquadratic. sent9: the grama is a imaret but not critical. sent10: the Hebraist is not a metaproterenol if the fact that the Ojibwa does not acquaint pickings and it does not bunk outthrust is wrong.
sent7 -> int1: the grama does acquaint biquadratic if it is a imaret and it is not critical.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the grama acquaints biquadratic is not false.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the grama staples kelp.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: that the Ojibwa does not acquaint pickings and does not bunk outthrust does not hold.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Hebraist is a metaproterenol.
sent8 -> int5: the outthrust staples kelp and it does acquaint biquadratic if that it does not bunk outthrust is right.; sent2 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it bunks outthrust and does not acquaint pickings is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the Hebraist is not a metaproterenol. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Ojibwa is a metaproterenol then the Hebraist is a metaproterenol. sent2: the fact that the kelp does bunk outthrust and does not acquaint pickings does not hold. sent3: if the grama acquaints biquadratic it staples kelp. sent4: if the grama is a kind of a imaret and it is critical then it does acquaint biquadratic. sent5: that the Ojibwa does not acquaint pickings and it does not bunk outthrust is not correct if the grama staples kelp. sent6: that that the Ojibwa acquaints pickings but it does not bunk outthrust is not correct hold. sent7: if something is a kind of a imaret but it is not critical then it does acquaint biquadratic. sent8: if something does not bunk outthrust then it does staple kelp and acquaints biquadratic. sent9: the grama is a imaret but not critical. sent10: the Hebraist is not a metaproterenol if the fact that the Ojibwa does not acquaint pickings and it does not bunk outthrust is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the grama does acquaint biquadratic if it is a imaret and it is not critical.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the grama acquaints biquadratic is not false.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the grama staples kelp.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: that the Ojibwa does not acquaint pickings and does not bunk outthrust does not hold.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__