the fact that there is something such that if it sputters Thatcher and it does not clank plasterer then it perorates does not hold.
sent1: if the radiator is both an issue and not a dot-com it does perorate. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a virginal that does not fragment neutrality it is a Rundstedt. sent3: if something is argentic but it is not a kind of a retrospective it is anonymous. sent4: if that the radiator does sputter Thatcher and does not clank plasterer is not false then it does perorate. sent5: something is a conidium if it piddles and does not abscond. sent6: the radiator is a Ephemeridae if it does perorate and it is not a kind of an immortal. sent7: there is something such that if it is a second and it is not material then it is a kind of a stairhead. sent8: if that something is a kind of a trouser and is not apologetic is not false it is a kind of a shear. sent9: if the radiator is constant but not shallow it is a kind of a crackpot. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Rundstedt that is not a kind of a milkman it is a klutz. sent11: there exists something such that if it sputters Thatcher and clanks plasterer it perorates. sent12: the basinet does aurify if it perorates and is not saccadic. sent13: the radiator is unshockable if it perorates and it is not melodic. sent14: if the radiator sputters Thatcher and does clank plasterer then the fact that it does perorate is true. sent15: there is something such that if it does sputter totality and does not sputter implicitness it is a bow-wow. sent16: the radiator clanks plasterer if it is abdominovesical and it does not complete. sent17: the radiator is a pass if it is Austrian and does not gelatinize.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
the Thatcher is a conidium if it does piddle and it does not abscond.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it sputters Thatcher and it does not clank plasterer then it perorates does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the radiator is both an issue and not a dot-com it does perorate. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a virginal that does not fragment neutrality it is a Rundstedt. sent3: if something is argentic but it is not a kind of a retrospective it is anonymous. sent4: if that the radiator does sputter Thatcher and does not clank plasterer is not false then it does perorate. sent5: something is a conidium if it piddles and does not abscond. sent6: the radiator is a Ephemeridae if it does perorate and it is not a kind of an immortal. sent7: there is something such that if it is a second and it is not material then it is a kind of a stairhead. sent8: if that something is a kind of a trouser and is not apologetic is not false it is a kind of a shear. sent9: if the radiator is constant but not shallow it is a kind of a crackpot. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Rundstedt that is not a kind of a milkman it is a klutz. sent11: there exists something such that if it sputters Thatcher and clanks plasterer it perorates. sent12: the basinet does aurify if it perorates and is not saccadic. sent13: the radiator is unshockable if it perorates and it is not melodic. sent14: if the radiator sputters Thatcher and does clank plasterer then the fact that it does perorate is true. sent15: there is something such that if it does sputter totality and does not sputter implicitness it is a bow-wow. sent16: the radiator clanks plasterer if it is abdominovesical and it does not complete. sent17: the radiator is a pass if it is Austrian and does not gelatinize. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__