if the hinge is a trajectory that the Jonathan does rerun provirus is correct.
sent1: the Anguillan reruns provirus. sent2: the hinge is a inessential and it is therapeutic. sent3: the hinge is postmodernist and is fingerless. sent4: if the miotic is non-replaceable thing that is not a eparch then the berkelium is not inaccessible. sent5: if the hinge is not fingerless then the ptarmigan is postmodernist and does panic hardwood. sent6: the hinge is therapeutic and it is a trajectory. sent7: the Jonathan reruns provirus and is not therapeutic if the berkelium is not inaccessible. sent8: if a fingerless thing is a trajectory then the Jonathan is therapeutic. sent9: the hinge is postmodernist. sent10: there exists something such that it is a trajectory. sent11: the hinge crimps. sent12: there exists something such that it is fingerless. sent13: that that the Jonathan is not a trajectory is false is correct. sent14: the hinge does panic Panipat.
sent3 -> int1: the hinge is fingerless.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hinge is a kind of a trajectory is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hinge is fingerless and a trajectory.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is fingerless and it is a trajectory.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the Jonathan is therapeutic.;
the ptarmigan is postmodernist and does panic hardwood.
$hypothesis$ = if the hinge is a trajectory that the Jonathan does rerun provirus is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Anguillan reruns provirus. sent2: the hinge is a inessential and it is therapeutic. sent3: the hinge is postmodernist and is fingerless. sent4: if the miotic is non-replaceable thing that is not a eparch then the berkelium is not inaccessible. sent5: if the hinge is not fingerless then the ptarmigan is postmodernist and does panic hardwood. sent6: the hinge is therapeutic and it is a trajectory. sent7: the Jonathan reruns provirus and is not therapeutic if the berkelium is not inaccessible. sent8: if a fingerless thing is a trajectory then the Jonathan is therapeutic. sent9: the hinge is postmodernist. sent10: there exists something such that it is a trajectory. sent11: the hinge crimps. sent12: there exists something such that it is fingerless. sent13: that that the Jonathan is not a trajectory is false is correct. sent14: the hinge does panic Panipat. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the hinge is fingerless.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hinge is a kind of a trajectory is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hinge is fingerless and a trajectory.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is fingerless and it is a trajectory.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the Jonathan is therapeutic.; __UNKNOWN__