the jerry-builder is astrocytic and not cryogenics.
sent1: the jerry-builder is a kind of a wave. sent2: if the jerry-builder is not heedless or it is not a escargot or both it is caecilian. sent3: if something is caecilian it is a nitrochloromethane. sent4: something is not a wave if that it is not heedless or it is not a escargot or both is false. sent5: if something is a nitrochloromethane then the fact that it is astrocytic and it is not cryogenics is incorrect.
sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the jerry-builder either is not heedless or is not a kind of a escargot or both is wrong it is not a wave.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the jerry-builder is heedful and/or it is not a escargot is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the jerry-builder is not a kind of a wave hold.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the jerry-builder either is not heedless or is not a kind of a escargot or both.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the jerry-builder is a caecilian.; sent3 -> int6: if the jerry-builder is a caecilian then it is a nitrochloromethane.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the jerry-builder is a nitrochloromethane.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that the jerry-builder is astrocytic but it is not cryogenics is not right if it is a kind of a nitrochloromethane.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the jerry-builder is astrocytic and not cryogenics. ; $context$ = sent1: the jerry-builder is a kind of a wave. sent2: if the jerry-builder is not heedless or it is not a escargot or both it is caecilian. sent3: if something is caecilian it is a nitrochloromethane. sent4: something is not a wave if that it is not heedless or it is not a escargot or both is false. sent5: if something is a nitrochloromethane then the fact that it is astrocytic and it is not cryogenics is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the jerry-builder either is not heedless or is not a kind of a escargot or both is wrong it is not a wave.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the jerry-builder is heedful and/or it is not a escargot is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the jerry-builder is not a kind of a wave hold.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the jerry-builder either is not heedless or is not a kind of a escargot or both.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the jerry-builder is a caecilian.; sent3 -> int6: if the jerry-builder is a caecilian then it is a nitrochloromethane.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the jerry-builder is a nitrochloromethane.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that the jerry-builder is astrocytic but it is not cryogenics is not right if it is a kind of a nitrochloromethane.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__