there exists something such that if it gathers playtime that it is not a trench and it is diligent does not hold.
sent1: if something is sexual that it is not domiciliary and it does bowl is false. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of an extension is not false the fact that it is a kind of a anthropometry that is a nettle does not hold. sent3: that the nap is a trench that is diligent is incorrect if it gathers playtime. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a unilateralism the fact that the fact that it is stemless and it is a kind of a partisan hold is not correct. sent5: if something is a kind of a harrier the fact that it is a kind of non-Proustian thing that gathers goat does not hold. sent6: if the shoe is a kind of a camera then that it gathers playtime and it is palpable is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it does gather playtime is correct it is not a kind of a trench and it is diligent. sent8: something that gathers playtime does not trench and is diligent. sent9: the fact that the nap does not bar Sheridan but it is a deathtrap is not right if it is a pen-friend. sent10: there is something such that if it is a cuddy then the fact that it sickens vantage and it is mayoral is incorrect. sent11: the fact that that something trenches and it is diligent is not incorrect is false if it gathers playtime.
there is something such that if it is sexual then that it is not domiciliary but a bowl does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that that the vantage is not domiciliary and bowls is not wrong does not hold hold if it is sexual.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it gathers playtime that it is not a trench and it is diligent does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is sexual that it is not domiciliary and it does bowl is false. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of an extension is not false the fact that it is a kind of a anthropometry that is a nettle does not hold. sent3: that the nap is a trench that is diligent is incorrect if it gathers playtime. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a unilateralism the fact that the fact that it is stemless and it is a kind of a partisan hold is not correct. sent5: if something is a kind of a harrier the fact that it is a kind of non-Proustian thing that gathers goat does not hold. sent6: if the shoe is a kind of a camera then that it gathers playtime and it is palpable is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it does gather playtime is correct it is not a kind of a trench and it is diligent. sent8: something that gathers playtime does not trench and is diligent. sent9: the fact that the nap does not bar Sheridan but it is a deathtrap is not right if it is a pen-friend. sent10: there is something such that if it is a cuddy then the fact that it sickens vantage and it is mayoral is incorrect. sent11: the fact that that something trenches and it is diligent is not incorrect is false if it gathers playtime. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__