the perfecting occurs.
sent1: that not the unawaresness but the arrogance happens is not true if the jamming erectness does not occur. sent2: if the mortalness does not occur the fact that the endogenicness and the naming occurs does not hold. sent3: the rearmament occurs if the promising pipe but not the blanketing Tyrol happens. sent4: the jamming gonococcus does not occur if the rearmament and the perfectedness occurs. sent5: if the exactaness does not occur the immortalness and the murine happens. sent6: the promising pipe does not occur and the blanketing Tyrol does not occur. sent7: that the jamming gonococcus occurs is not wrong. sent8: the blanketing quirk happens and the prudentness does not occur if the fact that the arrogance does not occur is not wrong. sent9: that the rearmament does not occur is prevented by that the promising pipe does not occur but the blanketing Tyrol happens. sent10: the jamming erectness does not occur if the fact that the Bantuness and the biotiticness occurs is not right. sent11: the arrogance does not occur if the fact that not the unawaresness but the arrogance happens is incorrect. sent12: the appreciation does not occur if that both the endogenicness and the naming happens is not right. sent13: if the reserve occurs the fact that the fact that the rearmament but not the jamming gonococcus happens does not hold is not wrong. sent14: the rearmament happens if the promising pipe does not occur and the blanketing Tyrol does not occur. sent15: that the prudentness does not occur causes that the reserving happens and the plummeting occurs. sent16: the fact that the Bantuness happens and the biotiticness occurs is wrong if the appreciation does not occur.
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the rearmament happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perfectedness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the rearmament and the perfecting happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the jamming gonococcus does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the perfectedness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the perfecting occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the unawaresness but the arrogance happens is not true if the jamming erectness does not occur. sent2: if the mortalness does not occur the fact that the endogenicness and the naming occurs does not hold. sent3: the rearmament occurs if the promising pipe but not the blanketing Tyrol happens. sent4: the jamming gonococcus does not occur if the rearmament and the perfectedness occurs. sent5: if the exactaness does not occur the immortalness and the murine happens. sent6: the promising pipe does not occur and the blanketing Tyrol does not occur. sent7: that the jamming gonococcus occurs is not wrong. sent8: the blanketing quirk happens and the prudentness does not occur if the fact that the arrogance does not occur is not wrong. sent9: that the rearmament does not occur is prevented by that the promising pipe does not occur but the blanketing Tyrol happens. sent10: the jamming erectness does not occur if the fact that the Bantuness and the biotiticness occurs is not right. sent11: the arrogance does not occur if the fact that not the unawaresness but the arrogance happens is incorrect. sent12: the appreciation does not occur if that both the endogenicness and the naming happens is not right. sent13: if the reserve occurs the fact that the fact that the rearmament but not the jamming gonococcus happens does not hold is not wrong. sent14: the rearmament happens if the promising pipe does not occur and the blanketing Tyrol does not occur. sent15: that the prudentness does not occur causes that the reserving happens and the plummeting occurs. sent16: the fact that the Bantuness happens and the biotiticness occurs is wrong if the appreciation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the rearmament happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perfectedness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the rearmament and the perfecting happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the jamming gonococcus does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__