the amusement does not occur.
sent1: the winnowing polygyny occurs. sent2: the cleaving does not occur if that the verbalizing does not occur and the DINK does not occur is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the indexicalness does not occur but the bye happens is not correct. sent4: if the ethnologicalness does not occur the indexicalness does not occur and the bye does not occur. sent5: the fact that the academicianship happens if the amusement happens hold. sent6: the fact that the non-gregariousness and the populating occurs does not hold. sent7: if that that not the undescriptiveness but the habituation occurs is not right is right then the habituation does not occur. sent8: the yodeling sabbatical happens if the fact that not the sidingness but the unpicking property happens is not right. sent9: that the bye does not occur results in that the winnowing polygyny does not occur or the ethnologicalness does not occur or both. sent10: if the sidearmness does not occur then the rupture does not occur. sent11: if the rupture does not occur then the fact that that the siding does not occur and the unpicking property happens is true is not true. sent12: the fact that the epentheticness does not occur is not incorrect if that either the jackstraws occurs or the populating does not occur or both is not true. sent13: if the epentheticness does not occur the fact that not the vacuuming but the facelessness occurs is wrong. sent14: that the fact that the indexicalness occurs and the bye does not occur is not false is false. sent15: the facelessness does not occur if the fact that that the vacuum does not occur but the facelessness happens is correct is not right. sent16: that the indexicalness does not occur and the bye does not occur is not right. sent17: that both the bye and the non-indexicalness happens does not hold if the habituation does not occur. sent18: the fact that the fact that the descriptiveness and the habituation occurs is false hold if the fact that the facelessness does not occur is not false. sent19: if the amusement occurs or the winnowing polygyny does not occur or both the amusement happens. sent20: if the cleaving does not occur that the fact that the jackstraws happens and/or the populating does not occur is not correct is not wrong. sent21: if the yodeling sabbatical occurs then that the verbalizing does not occur and the DINK does not occur does not hold. sent22: that that the ethnologicalness happens and the bye does not occur is false if the indexicalness does not occur hold. sent23: that the ethnologicalness happens is prevented by that the academicianship happens and the winnowing polygyny happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amusement happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the academicianship happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the academicianship happens and the winnowing polygyny occurs.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the ethnologicalness does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the indexicalness does not occur and the bye does not occur.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the amusement occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the amusement does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the winnowing polygyny occurs. sent2: the cleaving does not occur if that the verbalizing does not occur and the DINK does not occur is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the indexicalness does not occur but the bye happens is not correct. sent4: if the ethnologicalness does not occur the indexicalness does not occur and the bye does not occur. sent5: the fact that the academicianship happens if the amusement happens hold. sent6: the fact that the non-gregariousness and the populating occurs does not hold. sent7: if that that not the undescriptiveness but the habituation occurs is not right is right then the habituation does not occur. sent8: the yodeling sabbatical happens if the fact that not the sidingness but the unpicking property happens is not right. sent9: that the bye does not occur results in that the winnowing polygyny does not occur or the ethnologicalness does not occur or both. sent10: if the sidearmness does not occur then the rupture does not occur. sent11: if the rupture does not occur then the fact that that the siding does not occur and the unpicking property happens is true is not true. sent12: the fact that the epentheticness does not occur is not incorrect if that either the jackstraws occurs or the populating does not occur or both is not true. sent13: if the epentheticness does not occur the fact that not the vacuuming but the facelessness occurs is wrong. sent14: that the fact that the indexicalness occurs and the bye does not occur is not false is false. sent15: the facelessness does not occur if the fact that that the vacuum does not occur but the facelessness happens is correct is not right. sent16: that the indexicalness does not occur and the bye does not occur is not right. sent17: that both the bye and the non-indexicalness happens does not hold if the habituation does not occur. sent18: the fact that the fact that the descriptiveness and the habituation occurs is false hold if the fact that the facelessness does not occur is not false. sent19: if the amusement occurs or the winnowing polygyny does not occur or both the amusement happens. sent20: if the cleaving does not occur that the fact that the jackstraws happens and/or the populating does not occur is not correct is not wrong. sent21: if the yodeling sabbatical occurs then that the verbalizing does not occur and the DINK does not occur does not hold. sent22: that that the ethnologicalness happens and the bye does not occur is false if the indexicalness does not occur hold. sent23: that the ethnologicalness happens is prevented by that the academicianship happens and the winnowing polygyny happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amusement happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the academicianship happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the academicianship happens and the winnowing polygyny occurs.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the ethnologicalness does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the indexicalness does not occur and the bye does not occur.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__