that there is something such that if it is not a patty the fact that it is not diabatic but a Raskolnikov is correct is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it does not mean bottomland is not wrong it does not pole gunite. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a patty hold the fact that it is a Raskolnikov is correct. sent3: the wicket is not rhizoidal but a stem-winder if that it does not dull is correct. sent4: the wicket does gong gambit and does mean equatability if it is not a grill. sent5: the wicket is a kind of a Raskolnikov if that it is not a patty hold. sent6: the villa is not rhizoidal but it is a patty if it is not a trisomy. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a patty it is not diabatic. sent8: the fact that if the wicket is not the patty the wicket is both non-diabatic and a Raskolnikov is not incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a patty it is both non-diabatic and a Raskolnikov. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not unadoptable it means syncope and it is climatic. sent11: there is something such that if it does not pole enjoyableness then it is a stem-winder and does mask. sent12: if the wicket is not a patty then it is diabatic a Raskolnikov. sent13: the wicket is not a colorcast and is diabatic if it does not taper. sent14: something does not pole gunite and gongs healthiness if it is not physicochemical. sent15: if that something is not netting is right then it is a kind of non-diabatic thing that does gong Stizolobium.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is non-physicochemical it does not pole gunite and does gong healthiness.
sent14 -> int1: if the rapier is not physicochemical it does not pole gunite and gongs healthiness.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a patty the fact that it is not diabatic but a Raskolnikov is correct is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it does not mean bottomland is not wrong it does not pole gunite. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a patty hold the fact that it is a Raskolnikov is correct. sent3: the wicket is not rhizoidal but a stem-winder if that it does not dull is correct. sent4: the wicket does gong gambit and does mean equatability if it is not a grill. sent5: the wicket is a kind of a Raskolnikov if that it is not a patty hold. sent6: the villa is not rhizoidal but it is a patty if it is not a trisomy. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a patty it is not diabatic. sent8: the fact that if the wicket is not the patty the wicket is both non-diabatic and a Raskolnikov is not incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a patty it is both non-diabatic and a Raskolnikov. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not unadoptable it means syncope and it is climatic. sent11: there is something such that if it does not pole enjoyableness then it is a stem-winder and does mask. sent12: if the wicket is not a patty then it is diabatic a Raskolnikov. sent13: the wicket is not a colorcast and is diabatic if it does not taper. sent14: something does not pole gunite and gongs healthiness if it is not physicochemical. sent15: if that something is not netting is right then it is a kind of non-diabatic thing that does gong Stizolobium. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__