the fact that both the straightening obstructionist and the non-protozoologicalness occurs is not right if the epidemic happens.
sent1: that the enfranchisement and the ECCM happens prevents that the purifying occurs. sent2: the epidemic does not occur if the straightening obstructionist but not the protozoologicalness occurs. sent3: if that both the ashing checkers and the epidemic occurs is incorrect then the fact that the ashing checkers does not occur hold. sent4: the reconsidering does not occur if that the fact that both the security and the non-scapulohumeralness occurs is true is incorrect. sent5: that the pushing flint occurs and the mentalness happens does not hold. sent6: that the ashing checkers occurs and the epidemicness happens is wrong if that the reconsidering does not occur is not false. sent7: that the straightening obstructionist occurs and the protozoologicalness happens is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the straightening obstructionist and the non-protozoologicalness occurs is not incorrect.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the epidemicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epidemic occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the straightening obstructionist and the non-protozoologicalness happens does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the ashing checkers does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the straightening obstructionist and the non-protozoologicalness occurs is not right if the epidemic happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the enfranchisement and the ECCM happens prevents that the purifying occurs. sent2: the epidemic does not occur if the straightening obstructionist but not the protozoologicalness occurs. sent3: if that both the ashing checkers and the epidemic occurs is incorrect then the fact that the ashing checkers does not occur hold. sent4: the reconsidering does not occur if that the fact that both the security and the non-scapulohumeralness occurs is true is incorrect. sent5: that the pushing flint occurs and the mentalness happens does not hold. sent6: that the ashing checkers occurs and the epidemicness happens is wrong if that the reconsidering does not occur is not false. sent7: that the straightening obstructionist occurs and the protozoologicalness happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the straightening obstructionist and the non-protozoologicalness occurs is not incorrect.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the epidemicness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the epidemic occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the straightening obstructionist and the non-protozoologicalness happens does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__