the fact that the cash-and-carriness does not occur is correct.
sent1: the hurl does not occur if both the misdirection and the genocide occurs. sent2: that the interleaving Spassky does not occur but the discomycetousness occurs is wrong. sent3: the aposiopeticness occurs and the cholangiography happens. sent4: the discussion or the representation or both is triggered by that the spitball does not occur. sent5: the fact that the incestuousness does not occur is not wrong if the mitralness does not occur. sent6: the assignation does not occur. sent7: the treachery does not occur if the occasioning but not the escorting happens. sent8: the interleaving geneticist does not occur if that the contradistinguishing solidity happens and the cash-and-carriness occurs is right. sent9: that the occasion but not the escort occurs is right if the prerequisite does not occur. sent10: if the cacophony occurs the mitralness does not occur or the appearance does not occur or both. sent11: the contradistinguishing solidity is caused by that the discussion occurs. sent12: if the treachery does not occur that the contradistinguishing bosom or the non-anonymousness or both occurs does not hold. sent13: the fact that if that the contradistinguishing bosom happens and/or the anonymousness does not occur does not hold then the parasiticness does not occur is not wrong. sent14: the non-incestuousness brings about that the interleaving geneticist does not occur and the contradistinguishing solidity does not occur. sent15: the discomycetousness happens and the interleaving Spassky does not occur if the contradistinguishing tallness does not occur. sent16: the spitball does not occur if the fact that the discomycetousness does not occur is not false. sent17: the prerequisite does not occur if the fact that the proliferating does not occur but the Jeffersonianness happens is false. sent18: the non-cash-and-carryness is prevented by that the discussion does not occur. sent19: that the non-cash-and-carriness and the representation happens is not correct if the contradistinguishing solidity does not occur. sent20: if the interleaving Spassky does not occur then that the interleaving piaffe occurs hold. sent21: if the discussion occurs then the fact that not the escorting but the anonymousness happens is not correct. sent22: both the cacophony and the interleaving Gaskell occurs if the parasiticness does not occur. sent23: that the proliferating does not occur but the Jeffersonian happens is not right if the interleaving piaffe happens. sent24: that both the spitball and the representation happens is wrong if the contradistinguishing solidity does not occur. sent25: if that not the interleaving Spassky but the discomycetousness occurs is not true then the spitball does not occur. sent26: the contradistinguishing solidity happens if the representation happens. sent27: the interleaving geneticist happens.
sent25 & sent2 -> int1: the spitball does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the discussion or the representation or both occurs.; int2 & sent11 & sent26 -> int3: the contradistinguishing solidity occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cash-and-carriness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the contradistinguishing solidity and the cash-and-carriness occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the interleaving geneticist does not occur.; int5 & sent27 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the escorting does not occur and the anonymousness happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cash-and-carriness does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the hurl does not occur if both the misdirection and the genocide occurs. sent2: that the interleaving Spassky does not occur but the discomycetousness occurs is wrong. sent3: the aposiopeticness occurs and the cholangiography happens. sent4: the discussion or the representation or both is triggered by that the spitball does not occur. sent5: the fact that the incestuousness does not occur is not wrong if the mitralness does not occur. sent6: the assignation does not occur. sent7: the treachery does not occur if the occasioning but not the escorting happens. sent8: the interleaving geneticist does not occur if that the contradistinguishing solidity happens and the cash-and-carriness occurs is right. sent9: that the occasion but not the escort occurs is right if the prerequisite does not occur. sent10: if the cacophony occurs the mitralness does not occur or the appearance does not occur or both. sent11: the contradistinguishing solidity is caused by that the discussion occurs. sent12: if the treachery does not occur that the contradistinguishing bosom or the non-anonymousness or both occurs does not hold. sent13: the fact that if that the contradistinguishing bosom happens and/or the anonymousness does not occur does not hold then the parasiticness does not occur is not wrong. sent14: the non-incestuousness brings about that the interleaving geneticist does not occur and the contradistinguishing solidity does not occur. sent15: the discomycetousness happens and the interleaving Spassky does not occur if the contradistinguishing tallness does not occur. sent16: the spitball does not occur if the fact that the discomycetousness does not occur is not false. sent17: the prerequisite does not occur if the fact that the proliferating does not occur but the Jeffersonianness happens is false. sent18: the non-cash-and-carryness is prevented by that the discussion does not occur. sent19: that the non-cash-and-carriness and the representation happens is not correct if the contradistinguishing solidity does not occur. sent20: if the interleaving Spassky does not occur then that the interleaving piaffe occurs hold. sent21: if the discussion occurs then the fact that not the escorting but the anonymousness happens is not correct. sent22: both the cacophony and the interleaving Gaskell occurs if the parasiticness does not occur. sent23: that the proliferating does not occur but the Jeffersonian happens is not right if the interleaving piaffe happens. sent24: that both the spitball and the representation happens is wrong if the contradistinguishing solidity does not occur. sent25: if that not the interleaving Spassky but the discomycetousness occurs is not true then the spitball does not occur. sent26: the contradistinguishing solidity happens if the representation happens. sent27: the interleaving geneticist happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 & sent2 -> int1: the spitball does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the discussion or the representation or both occurs.; int2 & sent11 & sent26 -> int3: the contradistinguishing solidity occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cash-and-carriness happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the contradistinguishing solidity and the cash-and-carriness occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the interleaving geneticist does not occur.; int5 & sent27 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__