there is something such that if it is Hippocratic then it is both not cutting and a Cephalopterus.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not non-Hippocratic then it does not cut. sent2: there is something such that if it does steady it is cataplastic. sent3: something is non-maxillomandibular thing that is compressible if it is a Cephalopterus. sent4: there is something such that if it is hypothalamic then it is a kind of a Idaho and it hogs actuality. sent5: the neurobiologist is not a Mastotermitidae but cutting if it is a radiogram. sent6: if the neurobiologist is a kind of a cutting then it is high-tension thing that does beggar redbrush. sent7: there is something such that if it does repress representative then it is irreplaceable and it is supportive.
the fact that if the neurobiologist is the Cephalopterus the neurobiologist is not maxillomandibular but compressible is not incorrect.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is Hippocratic then it is both not cutting and a Cephalopterus. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not non-Hippocratic then it does not cut. sent2: there is something such that if it does steady it is cataplastic. sent3: something is non-maxillomandibular thing that is compressible if it is a Cephalopterus. sent4: there is something such that if it is hypothalamic then it is a kind of a Idaho and it hogs actuality. sent5: the neurobiologist is not a Mastotermitidae but cutting if it is a radiogram. sent6: if the neurobiologist is a kind of a cutting then it is high-tension thing that does beggar redbrush. sent7: there is something such that if it does repress representative then it is irreplaceable and it is supportive. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__