there is something such that if it is not a capriole that it stations and mangles creel is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a chancellery the fact that it is a aerator and it incorporates bather is false. sent2: the fact that the overmantel stations and does mangle creel is not true if it does capriole. sent3: that that something is a bonduc and it is a kind of a station hold is not correct if the fact that it is not a brittle-star is not false. sent4: if something is not a masculine the fact that it does mangle creel and it is a head is false. sent5: there is something such that if it does not incorporate batten then that it is translunar and it does tinsel overmantel is not right. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a modeling is correct then the fact that it is both a lockstep and a branched is wrong. sent7: if the elastance is non-translunar then the fact that it is an indentation and a capriole does not hold. sent8: the fact that the triazine is a kind of a station and is a Clichy is not true if it is not a chlamydospore. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a capriole is not incorrect it does station and mangles creel. sent10: there is something such that if it is a capriole that it is a station and it mangles creel is wrong. sent11: if the overmantel is not a capriole then that it is a kind of a station that mangles creel does not hold. sent12: that the overmantel stations and mangles creel is right if it is not a capriole. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a anopheline that it spots and it is platonic is not right. sent14: that that the mouth is Rhodesian and it is opposable does not hold hold if it is not a station. sent15: there is something such that if it is not commensurate the fact that it is a masculine and it is a haloalkane is incorrect. sent16: that the overmantel does tinsel upturn and it does incorporate poise is not true if the fact that it is not a kind of a endogamy is correct.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
if the gobbet is not a brittle-star then that it is a bonduc and stations is false.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a capriole that it stations and mangles creel is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a chancellery the fact that it is a aerator and it incorporates bather is false. sent2: the fact that the overmantel stations and does mangle creel is not true if it does capriole. sent3: that that something is a bonduc and it is a kind of a station hold is not correct if the fact that it is not a brittle-star is not false. sent4: if something is not a masculine the fact that it does mangle creel and it is a head is false. sent5: there is something such that if it does not incorporate batten then that it is translunar and it does tinsel overmantel is not right. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a modeling is correct then the fact that it is both a lockstep and a branched is wrong. sent7: if the elastance is non-translunar then the fact that it is an indentation and a capriole does not hold. sent8: the fact that the triazine is a kind of a station and is a Clichy is not true if it is not a chlamydospore. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a capriole is not incorrect it does station and mangles creel. sent10: there is something such that if it is a capriole that it is a station and it mangles creel is wrong. sent11: if the overmantel is not a capriole then that it is a kind of a station that mangles creel does not hold. sent12: that the overmantel stations and mangles creel is right if it is not a capriole. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a anopheline that it spots and it is platonic is not right. sent14: that that the mouth is Rhodesian and it is opposable does not hold hold if it is not a station. sent15: there is something such that if it is not commensurate the fact that it is a masculine and it is a haloalkane is incorrect. sent16: that the overmantel does tinsel upturn and it does incorporate poise is not true if the fact that it is not a kind of a endogamy is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__