that the laughing does not occur if the prefecture happens is not true.
sent1: the percussiveness does not occur. sent2: if both the non-percussiveness and the prefecture happens then the laugh does not occur. sent3: not the thrusting watcher but the unopposableness occurs. sent4: the laugh happens if not the percussiveness but the prefecture happens. sent5: the laugh happens. sent6: the fact that the cant does not occur is correct if the fact that not the laugh but the computerization happens is false. sent7: that the laughing occurs is correct if the prefecture happens. sent8: the ebb happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prefecture occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-percussiveness and the prefecture happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the laugh does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
not the canting but the healing ALIR occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the laughing does not occur if the prefecture happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the percussiveness does not occur. sent2: if both the non-percussiveness and the prefecture happens then the laugh does not occur. sent3: not the thrusting watcher but the unopposableness occurs. sent4: the laugh happens if not the percussiveness but the prefecture happens. sent5: the laugh happens. sent6: the fact that the cant does not occur is correct if the fact that not the laugh but the computerization happens is false. sent7: that the laughing occurs is correct if the prefecture happens. sent8: the ebb happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prefecture occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-percussiveness and the prefecture happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the laugh does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__