the nucellus is contextual but it is not a abashment.
sent1: that the ruin is phenotypical thing that does glamorize teaser is wrong. sent2: the ruin is phenotypical and is a go-kart if the whitetail is not a kind of a go-kart. sent3: if that the fact that something is a kind of non-inaccessible thing that is not a go-kart is not incorrect is false it is not contextual. sent4: the nucellus is contextual if the fact that the whitetail is phenotypical but it is not contextual does not hold. sent5: if the whitetail is not contextual that the nucellus is contextual but it is not a abashment is false. sent6: the ruin is not phenotypical if that it is phenotypical thing that glamorizes teaser is false. sent7: that the nucellus does glamorize teaser but it is not contextual is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whitetail is not inaccessible and it is not a go-kart.; assump1 -> int1: the whitetail is not a go-kart.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the ruin is phenotypical and is a go-kart.; int2 -> int3: the ruin is phenotypical.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the ruin is not phenotypical.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the whitetail is not inaccessible and it is not a kind of a go-kart is not right.; sent3 -> int7: if that the whitetail is both not inaccessible and not a go-kart is not correct then it is not contextual.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the whitetail is not contextual.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the nucellus is contextual and is not a abashment.
$hypothesis$ = the nucellus is contextual but it is not a abashment. ; $context$ = sent1: that the ruin is phenotypical thing that does glamorize teaser is wrong. sent2: the ruin is phenotypical and is a go-kart if the whitetail is not a kind of a go-kart. sent3: if that the fact that something is a kind of non-inaccessible thing that is not a go-kart is not incorrect is false it is not contextual. sent4: the nucellus is contextual if the fact that the whitetail is phenotypical but it is not contextual does not hold. sent5: if the whitetail is not contextual that the nucellus is contextual but it is not a abashment is false. sent6: the ruin is not phenotypical if that it is phenotypical thing that glamorizes teaser is false. sent7: that the nucellus does glamorize teaser but it is not contextual is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whitetail is not inaccessible and it is not a go-kart.; assump1 -> int1: the whitetail is not a go-kart.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the ruin is phenotypical and is a go-kart.; int2 -> int3: the ruin is phenotypical.; sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the ruin is not phenotypical.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the whitetail is not inaccessible and it is not a kind of a go-kart is not right.; sent3 -> int7: if that the whitetail is both not inaccessible and not a go-kart is not correct then it is not contextual.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the whitetail is not contextual.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__