the nonlinearness happens.
sent1: if the savory occurs and/or the drying does not occur the drying does not occur. sent2: if that the simulating occurs and the ultramicroscopicness does not occur is not right the dichromaticness does not occur. sent3: if the off-streetness does not occur the fact that both the simulating and the non-ultramicroscopicness happens is false. sent4: that the scrabbling happens and the hematopoieticness happens is wrong if that the dichromaticness does not occur is correct. sent5: the sparkling char occurs. sent6: the ultramontane does not occur if the precaution and the sparkling char happens. sent7: the Doctor happens. sent8: the drying occurs if the sparkling sideline occurs but the repechage does not occur. sent9: either the dry or the savoriness or both prevents that the nonlinearness occurs. sent10: the scrabbling happens. sent11: the investigating Palmer happens. sent12: if the sparkling char does not occur the precaution happens and the ergotropicness occurs. sent13: if the sparkling char does not occur the nonlinearness and the precaution happens. sent14: that the investigating Palmer but not the ultramontaneness occurs brings about that the repechage does not occur. sent15: the precaution happens. sent16: the impersonating happens. sent17: the spamming but not the winding happens. sent18: if the scrabbling occurs the sparkling sideline occurs. sent19: if that the scrabbling happens and the hematopoieticness occurs does not hold the scrabbling does not occur. sent20: that the scrabbling does not occur results in the savoriness and/or that the driness does not occur.
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: both the precaution and the sparkling char occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the ultramontaneness does not occur is correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the investigating Palmer but not the ultramontaneness happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: that the repechage does not occur is correct.; sent18 & sent10 -> int5: the sparkling sideline happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the sparkling sideline happens and the repechage does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the drying occurs hold.; int7 -> int8: the dry and/or the savoriness occurs.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the nonlinearness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the nonlinearness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the savory occurs and/or the drying does not occur the drying does not occur. sent2: if that the simulating occurs and the ultramicroscopicness does not occur is not right the dichromaticness does not occur. sent3: if the off-streetness does not occur the fact that both the simulating and the non-ultramicroscopicness happens is false. sent4: that the scrabbling happens and the hematopoieticness happens is wrong if that the dichromaticness does not occur is correct. sent5: the sparkling char occurs. sent6: the ultramontane does not occur if the precaution and the sparkling char happens. sent7: the Doctor happens. sent8: the drying occurs if the sparkling sideline occurs but the repechage does not occur. sent9: either the dry or the savoriness or both prevents that the nonlinearness occurs. sent10: the scrabbling happens. sent11: the investigating Palmer happens. sent12: if the sparkling char does not occur the precaution happens and the ergotropicness occurs. sent13: if the sparkling char does not occur the nonlinearness and the precaution happens. sent14: that the investigating Palmer but not the ultramontaneness occurs brings about that the repechage does not occur. sent15: the precaution happens. sent16: the impersonating happens. sent17: the spamming but not the winding happens. sent18: if the scrabbling occurs the sparkling sideline occurs. sent19: if that the scrabbling happens and the hematopoieticness occurs does not hold the scrabbling does not occur. sent20: that the scrabbling does not occur results in the savoriness and/or that the driness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: both the precaution and the sparkling char occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the ultramontaneness does not occur is correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the investigating Palmer but not the ultramontaneness happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: that the repechage does not occur is correct.; sent18 & sent10 -> int5: the sparkling sideline happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the sparkling sideline happens and the repechage does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the drying occurs hold.; int7 -> int8: the dry and/or the savoriness occurs.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__