the fact that the comparison brings about the cartwheeling is incorrect.
sent1: that the stilling anarthria does not occur and the lettering psychologist does not occur brings about that the intolerantness occurs. sent2: that the non-separateness leads to that the northeaster does not occur and the purveyance does not occur hold. sent3: if the nonextantness does not occur then the cartwheel happens. sent4: if that the nonextantness and the non-mucopurulentness happens is not correct then the cartwheeling happens. sent5: that the separating happens is prevented by the non-mucopurulentness. sent6: the fact that the unawareness occurs but the scramble does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the comparison does not occur if the northeaster but not the purveyance occurs. sent8: the rage does not occur. sent9: the fact that the stagging does not occur and the rioting does not occur if the troubling Ceratopogonidae does not occur is not wrong. sent10: if the northeaster does not occur and the purveyance does not occur then the comparison does not occur. sent11: that the nonextantness occurs hold. sent12: the sitcom does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the comparison happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nonextantness happens but the mucopurulentness does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the mucopurulentness does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the separateness does not occur is right.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the northeaster does not occur and the purveyance does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the comparison does not occur.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: that the nonextantness but not the mucopurulentness happens is false.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the cartwheeling occurs hold.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the comparison brings about the cartwheeling is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the stilling anarthria does not occur and the lettering psychologist does not occur brings about that the intolerantness occurs. sent2: that the non-separateness leads to that the northeaster does not occur and the purveyance does not occur hold. sent3: if the nonextantness does not occur then the cartwheel happens. sent4: if that the nonextantness and the non-mucopurulentness happens is not correct then the cartwheeling happens. sent5: that the separating happens is prevented by the non-mucopurulentness. sent6: the fact that the unawareness occurs but the scramble does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the comparison does not occur if the northeaster but not the purveyance occurs. sent8: the rage does not occur. sent9: the fact that the stagging does not occur and the rioting does not occur if the troubling Ceratopogonidae does not occur is not wrong. sent10: if the northeaster does not occur and the purveyance does not occur then the comparison does not occur. sent11: that the nonextantness occurs hold. sent12: the sitcom does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the comparison happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nonextantness happens but the mucopurulentness does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the mucopurulentness does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the separateness does not occur is right.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the northeaster does not occur and the purveyance does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the comparison does not occur.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: that the nonextantness but not the mucopurulentness happens is false.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the cartwheeling occurs hold.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__