if the calomel does constipate it does not clock Housman.
sent1: if something that does not defray Laffite is not a graham then it does not constipate. sent2: the calomel does not defray Laffite. sent3: if something clocks Housman it does not defray Laffite. sent4: if something does clock Housman then it does not defray Laffite and is not a graham.
sent4 -> int1: if the calomel does clock Housman it does not defray Laffite and it is not a graham.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the calomel does clock Housman.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the calomel does not defray Laffite and it is not a graham.; sent1 -> int3: the calomel does not constipate if it does not defray Laffite and is not a kind of a graham.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the calomel does not constipate.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calomel constipates.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the calomel does not clock Housman.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the calomel does constipate it does not clock Housman. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does not defray Laffite is not a graham then it does not constipate. sent2: the calomel does not defray Laffite. sent3: if something clocks Housman it does not defray Laffite. sent4: if something does clock Housman then it does not defray Laffite and is not a graham. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the calomel does clock Housman it does not defray Laffite and it is not a graham.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the calomel does clock Housman.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the calomel does not defray Laffite and it is not a graham.; sent1 -> int3: the calomel does not constipate if it does not defray Laffite and is not a kind of a graham.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the calomel does not constipate.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the calomel constipates.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the calomel does not clock Housman.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__