the photocathode rabbets lodgepole.
sent1: if the pompon does not dislodge it is not lunisolar and it does not identify Nipa. sent2: something is italic but it is not Gallic if it is intraventricular. sent3: if something is an emitter that it is not italic and it is not Gallic is not right. sent4: the pompon is not Gallic if the xylem is both italic and intraventricular. sent5: if something does wive the fact that it is not a madder and not mercantile is wrong. sent6: if something is both an italic and not Gallic then the Khedive is an emitter. sent7: there exists something such that it does not wive. sent8: if that the pompon does not wear cartoon and it does not identify Grimm is not true then that it does not dislodge is not false. sent9: there exists something such that that it is both not italic and Gallic is false. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-italic thing that is not Gallic is false the xylem is intraventricular. sent11: if the Khedive does rabbet valuer then that it is not a kind of a Cavendish and it is a kind of a vomitory is not correct. sent12: there is something such that that the fact that it is a kind of an italic and it is not Gallic hold is not correct. sent13: something is not an italic and it is not Gallic. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it does wive is not false. sent15: if the Nipa is lunisolar the photocathode rabbets lodgepole. sent16: the fact that the pompon does not rabbet lodgepole and it is not a kind of an emitter is not true. sent17: if there exists something such that it does not wive then the Khedive is a Cavendish. sent18: the fact that the photocathode is not a Cavendish but it rabbets lodgepole does not hold. sent19: the Nipa is lunisolar if the xylem is intraventricular. sent20: if there exists something such that it is an italic then the xylem is intraventricular. sent21: that something wives and is not a Cavendish is false if it is an emitter. sent22: if something is a kind of a Cavendish and it is an emitter the fact that the Khedive wives is not false. sent23: there is something such that that it does not rabbet lodgepole and is not a Cavendish is wrong. sent24: if something is not lunisolar and does not identify Nipa it is intraventricular. sent25: the pompon is an emitter if the Khedive is a Cavendish. sent26: the xylem is an emitter if there is something such that the fact that it is non-italic thing that is not intraventricular is wrong.
sent7 & sent17 -> int1: the Khedive is a Cavendish.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the fact that the pompon is an emitter is correct.; sent3 -> int3: if the pompon is an emitter then the fact that it is not an italic and it is not Gallic is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the pompon is not an italic and is not Gallic is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is not an italic and not Gallic is wrong.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: that the xylem is intraventricular hold.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the Nipa is lunisolar.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that that it does not madder and is not mercantile is incorrect.
sent5 -> int8: if that the Khedive wives hold then that it is not a madder and it is not mercantile is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the photocathode rabbets lodgepole. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pompon does not dislodge it is not lunisolar and it does not identify Nipa. sent2: something is italic but it is not Gallic if it is intraventricular. sent3: if something is an emitter that it is not italic and it is not Gallic is not right. sent4: the pompon is not Gallic if the xylem is both italic and intraventricular. sent5: if something does wive the fact that it is not a madder and not mercantile is wrong. sent6: if something is both an italic and not Gallic then the Khedive is an emitter. sent7: there exists something such that it does not wive. sent8: if that the pompon does not wear cartoon and it does not identify Grimm is not true then that it does not dislodge is not false. sent9: there exists something such that that it is both not italic and Gallic is false. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-italic thing that is not Gallic is false the xylem is intraventricular. sent11: if the Khedive does rabbet valuer then that it is not a kind of a Cavendish and it is a kind of a vomitory is not correct. sent12: there is something such that that the fact that it is a kind of an italic and it is not Gallic hold is not correct. sent13: something is not an italic and it is not Gallic. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it does wive is not false. sent15: if the Nipa is lunisolar the photocathode rabbets lodgepole. sent16: the fact that the pompon does not rabbet lodgepole and it is not a kind of an emitter is not true. sent17: if there exists something such that it does not wive then the Khedive is a Cavendish. sent18: the fact that the photocathode is not a Cavendish but it rabbets lodgepole does not hold. sent19: the Nipa is lunisolar if the xylem is intraventricular. sent20: if there exists something such that it is an italic then the xylem is intraventricular. sent21: that something wives and is not a Cavendish is false if it is an emitter. sent22: if something is a kind of a Cavendish and it is an emitter the fact that the Khedive wives is not false. sent23: there is something such that that it does not rabbet lodgepole and is not a Cavendish is wrong. sent24: if something is not lunisolar and does not identify Nipa it is intraventricular. sent25: the pompon is an emitter if the Khedive is a Cavendish. sent26: the xylem is an emitter if there is something such that the fact that it is non-italic thing that is not intraventricular is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent17 -> int1: the Khedive is a Cavendish.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the fact that the pompon is an emitter is correct.; sent3 -> int3: if the pompon is an emitter then the fact that it is not an italic and it is not Gallic is not true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the pompon is not an italic and is not Gallic is false.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is not an italic and not Gallic is wrong.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: that the xylem is intraventricular hold.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the Nipa is lunisolar.; int7 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__