the gynostegium is not a founder or does not sidle waxmallow or both.
sent1: if the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is not gyroscopic and it does not impinge is false is correct then the Jezebel is a Bhutanese. sent2: if something that is gyroscopic does not impinge then it depressurizes. sent3: the fact that something is not a bioluminescence but it accomplishes is incorrect if it sidles Jezebel. sent4: the Jezebel is not Bhutanese. sent5: the gynostegium is not a pyxie if the fact that it is not a bioluminescence and accomplishes is incorrect. sent6: the assemblywoman does clinch sodomy if it is not nomothetic and it is not gyroscopic. sent7: something that is not a pyxie is not a kind of a founder or does not sidle waxmallow or both. sent8: the gynostegium sidles Jezebel if it does depressurize. sent9: if the gynostegium is not a kind of a pyxie then it is not a kind of a founder and/or it sidles waxmallow. sent10: that something is a kind of a bioluminescence and it does accomplish is not true if it sidles Jezebel.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gynostegium is non-gyroscopic thing that does not impinge is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not gyroscopic and it does not impinge is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Jezebel is a Bhutanese.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gynostegium is non-gyroscopic thing that does not impinge.; sent3 -> int5: if the gynostegium does sidle Jezebel then that it is not a kind of a bioluminescence and it accomplishes does not hold.; sent7 -> int6: if the gynostegium is not a pyxie then it either does not founder or does not sidle waxmallow or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the gynostegium is not a founder or does not sidle waxmallow or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is not gyroscopic and it does not impinge is false is correct then the Jezebel is a Bhutanese. sent2: if something that is gyroscopic does not impinge then it depressurizes. sent3: the fact that something is not a bioluminescence but it accomplishes is incorrect if it sidles Jezebel. sent4: the Jezebel is not Bhutanese. sent5: the gynostegium is not a pyxie if the fact that it is not a bioluminescence and accomplishes is incorrect. sent6: the assemblywoman does clinch sodomy if it is not nomothetic and it is not gyroscopic. sent7: something that is not a pyxie is not a kind of a founder or does not sidle waxmallow or both. sent8: the gynostegium sidles Jezebel if it does depressurize. sent9: if the gynostegium is not a kind of a pyxie then it is not a kind of a founder and/or it sidles waxmallow. sent10: that something is a kind of a bioluminescence and it does accomplish is not true if it sidles Jezebel. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gynostegium is non-gyroscopic thing that does not impinge is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is not gyroscopic and it does not impinge is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the Jezebel is a Bhutanese.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gynostegium is non-gyroscopic thing that does not impinge.; sent3 -> int5: if the gynostegium does sidle Jezebel then that it is not a kind of a bioluminescence and it accomplishes does not hold.; sent7 -> int6: if the gynostegium is not a pyxie then it either does not founder or does not sidle waxmallow or both.; __UNKNOWN__