the fact that the Francophile is both not a meow and not sculptural is incorrect if it does clout Haftorah.
sent1: the Francophile is both non-sculptural and not a saddle if it is a wattle. sent2: the fact that something is both not a barrister and a latency does not hold if it cultures. sent3: if something does clout Haftorah then the fact that it is a kind of a meow and is not sculptural is not correct. sent4: the fact that something is impenetrable thing that is not a fructose is false if it is sigmoid. sent5: if something is eponymous then the fact that it is a bassine and it is not perithelial is incorrect. sent6: if the Francophile causes the fact that it is sculptural and it is not a kind of a king is incorrect. sent7: the fact that something is not a meow and it is not sculptural is not true if it does clout Haftorah. sent8: if something is ergonomic that it does entail stoup and does not clout grammarian is not right. sent9: something is both not a picture and not Japanese if it does clout checkup. sent10: the fact that something does not butt and entails stoup is false if that it collars Pyrocephalus is correct. sent11: the fact that something is not incontinent and it is not a kind of a filature is not correct if it does clout grammarian. sent12: if the Francophile is a generalization the fact that it is not apomictic and it is not a Japanese is false. sent13: the fact that something does not clout grammarian but it is perithelial is false if it does clout half-and-half. sent14: the fact that the Francophile does not meow but it is sculptural is not right if that it does clout Haftorah is not false. sent15: the fact that something is not a Baptist but it is a traffic is wrong if it is incredulous. sent16: that the Francophile does not meow and it does not quest if the Francophile is a hyoid is right.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Francophile is both not a meow and not sculptural is incorrect if it does clout Haftorah. ; $context$ = sent1: the Francophile is both non-sculptural and not a saddle if it is a wattle. sent2: the fact that something is both not a barrister and a latency does not hold if it cultures. sent3: if something does clout Haftorah then the fact that it is a kind of a meow and is not sculptural is not correct. sent4: the fact that something is impenetrable thing that is not a fructose is false if it is sigmoid. sent5: if something is eponymous then the fact that it is a bassine and it is not perithelial is incorrect. sent6: if the Francophile causes the fact that it is sculptural and it is not a kind of a king is incorrect. sent7: the fact that something is not a meow and it is not sculptural is not true if it does clout Haftorah. sent8: if something is ergonomic that it does entail stoup and does not clout grammarian is not right. sent9: something is both not a picture and not Japanese if it does clout checkup. sent10: the fact that something does not butt and entails stoup is false if that it collars Pyrocephalus is correct. sent11: the fact that something is not incontinent and it is not a kind of a filature is not correct if it does clout grammarian. sent12: if the Francophile is a generalization the fact that it is not apomictic and it is not a Japanese is false. sent13: the fact that something does not clout grammarian but it is perithelial is false if it does clout half-and-half. sent14: the fact that the Francophile does not meow but it is sculptural is not right if that it does clout Haftorah is not false. sent15: the fact that something is not a Baptist but it is a traffic is wrong if it is incredulous. sent16: that the Francophile does not meow and it does not quest if the Francophile is a hyoid is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__