the pachyderm is not a Nobel.
sent1: something japans if that it does not bespangle and it is not a japans does not hold. sent2: something is unavailable if that it is cryonic and it is not acquisitive is wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a routemarch that the pachyderm is cryonic but not acquisitive is false. sent4: if the pachyderm is unavailable and a Nobel the coccyx does not stint played. sent5: if something japans then it stints played. sent6: that the coccyx does not bespangle and it does not japan is not correct. sent7: if the coccyx is not cryonic the pachyderm is a Nobel but it is not a kind of a routemarch. sent8: something is not a routemarch.
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: that the pachyderm is cryonic but it is not acquisitive is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: the pachyderm is unavailable if the fact that it is cryonic and it is not acquisitive is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pachyderm is unavailable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pachyderm is a kind of a Nobel is correct.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the pachyderm is unavailable and is a Nobel.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the coccyx does not stint played.; sent5 -> int6: if the coccyx is a japan it does stint played.; sent1 -> int7: the coccyx is a japan if that it does not bespangle and is not a japan is false.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the coccyx is a japan.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the coccyx stints played.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the pachyderm is a Nobel.
$hypothesis$ = the pachyderm is not a Nobel. ; $context$ = sent1: something japans if that it does not bespangle and it is not a japans does not hold. sent2: something is unavailable if that it is cryonic and it is not acquisitive is wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a routemarch that the pachyderm is cryonic but not acquisitive is false. sent4: if the pachyderm is unavailable and a Nobel the coccyx does not stint played. sent5: if something japans then it stints played. sent6: that the coccyx does not bespangle and it does not japan is not correct. sent7: if the coccyx is not cryonic the pachyderm is a Nobel but it is not a kind of a routemarch. sent8: something is not a routemarch. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent3 -> int1: that the pachyderm is cryonic but it is not acquisitive is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: the pachyderm is unavailable if the fact that it is cryonic and it is not acquisitive is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pachyderm is unavailable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the pachyderm is a kind of a Nobel is correct.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the pachyderm is unavailable and is a Nobel.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the coccyx does not stint played.; sent5 -> int6: if the coccyx is a japan it does stint played.; sent1 -> int7: the coccyx is a japan if that it does not bespangle and is not a japan is false.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the coccyx is a japan.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the coccyx stints played.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__