that if the freestone does not emulsify linchpin then that the vestibule is a kind of a taurine and it is a kind of a flagship is wrong does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that either it is not a Eglevsky or it is not a taurine or both. sent2: if something is not a kind of a sociable or does not bandy or both then that the Primaxin is a Eglevsky is not false. sent3: the fact that the Primaxin is a kind of a flagship and does bandy is false. sent4: something is taurine and/or it is not a kind of an awfulness. sent5: if there is something such that it does not bandy the freestone is an awfulness. sent6: if the freestone is a kind of taurine a Eglevsky it is not a flagship. sent7: the freestone bandies. sent8: if the vestibule is not a taurine then it is an awfulness and is a Eglevsky. sent9: something does not adjoin bluffness and/or it is not a kind of a Brownie. sent10: the fact that if the freestone is a kind of the Eglevsky that plants the freestone is not taurine is correct. sent11: if the fact that the freestone is not a sociable is not wrong then the Primaxin is a kind of a Eglevsky and it plants. sent12: the vestibule is not a kind of a taurine if it is not sociable. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a Eglevsky and/or it is a taurine. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a sociable or it does not bandy or both then the freestone is a kind of an awfulness. sent15: something is a sociable or does not bandy or both. sent16: the wagon does not stake and does not emulsify linchpin. sent17: the Primaxin is not a kind of a flagship. sent18: that the freestone does emulsify linchpin and is not a plant is not true if the vestibule is an awfulness. sent19: the vestibule is not a taurine if it emulsifies linchpin and it does bandy. sent20: the fact that the freestone is not a plant and does not emulsify linchpin is wrong. sent21: the Primaxin is not a sociable and/or it does not bandy. sent22: something is not a Eglevsky if it is a plant and it is an awfulness. sent23: that that the vestibule is taurine a flagship is not incorrect is incorrect if the freestone is not a Eglevsky. sent24: the freestone is not taurine and does not emulsify linchpin. sent25: the freestone is a kind of a sociable and is a flagship if the vestibule does not emulsify linchpin.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the freestone is not a plant.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freestone does not emulsify linchpin.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the freestone does not plant and it does not emulsify linchpin.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the freestone is a plant.; sent21 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not sociable and/or it does not bandy.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the freestone is an awfulness.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the freestone is a plant and it is a kind of an awfulness.; sent22 -> int7: if the freestone plants and is an awfulness then it is not a Eglevsky.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the freestone is not a Eglevsky.; int8 & sent23 -> int9: that the vestibule is taurine thing that is a kind of a flagship is not true.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the cornet does not remodel Alexandrian and it is not robotic.
$hypothesis$ = that if the freestone does not emulsify linchpin then that the vestibule is a kind of a taurine and it is a kind of a flagship is wrong does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that either it is not a Eglevsky or it is not a taurine or both. sent2: if something is not a kind of a sociable or does not bandy or both then that the Primaxin is a Eglevsky is not false. sent3: the fact that the Primaxin is a kind of a flagship and does bandy is false. sent4: something is taurine and/or it is not a kind of an awfulness. sent5: if there is something such that it does not bandy the freestone is an awfulness. sent6: if the freestone is a kind of taurine a Eglevsky it is not a flagship. sent7: the freestone bandies. sent8: if the vestibule is not a taurine then it is an awfulness and is a Eglevsky. sent9: something does not adjoin bluffness and/or it is not a kind of a Brownie. sent10: the fact that if the freestone is a kind of the Eglevsky that plants the freestone is not taurine is correct. sent11: if the fact that the freestone is not a sociable is not wrong then the Primaxin is a kind of a Eglevsky and it plants. sent12: the vestibule is not a kind of a taurine if it is not sociable. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a Eglevsky and/or it is a taurine. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a sociable or it does not bandy or both then the freestone is a kind of an awfulness. sent15: something is a sociable or does not bandy or both. sent16: the wagon does not stake and does not emulsify linchpin. sent17: the Primaxin is not a kind of a flagship. sent18: that the freestone does emulsify linchpin and is not a plant is not true if the vestibule is an awfulness. sent19: the vestibule is not a taurine if it emulsifies linchpin and it does bandy. sent20: the fact that the freestone is not a plant and does not emulsify linchpin is wrong. sent21: the Primaxin is not a sociable and/or it does not bandy. sent22: something is not a Eglevsky if it is a plant and it is an awfulness. sent23: that that the vestibule is taurine a flagship is not incorrect is incorrect if the freestone is not a Eglevsky. sent24: the freestone is not taurine and does not emulsify linchpin. sent25: the freestone is a kind of a sociable and is a flagship if the vestibule does not emulsify linchpin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the freestone is not a plant.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freestone does not emulsify linchpin.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the freestone does not plant and it does not emulsify linchpin.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the freestone is a plant.; sent21 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not sociable and/or it does not bandy.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the freestone is an awfulness.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the freestone is a plant and it is a kind of an awfulness.; sent22 -> int7: if the freestone plants and is an awfulness then it is not a Eglevsky.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the freestone is not a Eglevsky.; int8 & sent23 -> int9: that the vestibule is taurine thing that is a kind of a flagship is not true.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__