the Walloons is a progestin.
sent1: if something does not admeasure bloodmobile then the fact that it is a twinge is right. sent2: the Walloons is a progestin if the ziggurat is a Brighton. sent3: there exists nothing that repines and is a finalization. sent4: the ziggurat is not a kind of a progestin. sent5: if that the dispensary repines and is a finalization is false it does not admeasure nonprofit. sent6: there is nothing such that it is a Rhone that twinges. sent7: if that something is not non-four-wheel but it is not likely does not hold then it is audiometric. sent8: the dispensary is a Brighton. sent9: the fact that the door is a mileage that is epistemic is not correct. sent10: if the Walloons is not a progestin it admeasures nonprofit. sent11: the Walloons is a Brighton if the ziggurat is a progestin. sent12: that the ziggurat does admeasure nonprofit but it does not cover Ewe is incorrect if the dispensary does not admeasure nonprofit. sent13: the dispensary covers Ewe.
sent3 -> int1: that that the dispensary repines and is a kind of a finalization is wrong is correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the dispensary does not admeasure nonprofit.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the ziggurat admeasures nonprofit but it does not cover Ewe is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Walloons is a progestin. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not admeasure bloodmobile then the fact that it is a twinge is right. sent2: the Walloons is a progestin if the ziggurat is a Brighton. sent3: there exists nothing that repines and is a finalization. sent4: the ziggurat is not a kind of a progestin. sent5: if that the dispensary repines and is a finalization is false it does not admeasure nonprofit. sent6: there is nothing such that it is a Rhone that twinges. sent7: if that something is not non-four-wheel but it is not likely does not hold then it is audiometric. sent8: the dispensary is a Brighton. sent9: the fact that the door is a mileage that is epistemic is not correct. sent10: if the Walloons is not a progestin it admeasures nonprofit. sent11: the Walloons is a Brighton if the ziggurat is a progestin. sent12: that the ziggurat does admeasure nonprofit but it does not cover Ewe is incorrect if the dispensary does not admeasure nonprofit. sent13: the dispensary covers Ewe. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that that the dispensary repines and is a kind of a finalization is wrong is correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the dispensary does not admeasure nonprofit.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the ziggurat admeasures nonprofit but it does not cover Ewe is false.; __UNKNOWN__