that the limber does not personify front-runner but it is postural is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that it does personify rhinotomy and is not discriminate. sent2: if there exists something such that it does not personify rhinotomy then the limber does not personify front-runner. sent3: if the fact that the limber is both not a switch-ivy and not univalve is not right then the chatelaine is not univalve. sent4: if the limber is a corkage then it is postural. sent5: something does personify Piaget but it is not a coalescence if it does not personify accession. sent6: something personifies front-runner and is a kind of a corkage if it is not univalve. sent7: something personifies front-runner and is not non-postural if it is not univalve. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is a corkage and it personifies front-runner does not hold. sent9: if something does personify front-runner it is a corkage. sent10: the limber is a corkage. sent11: there exists something such that that it personifies rhinotomy and does not discriminate does not hold. sent12: something is postural and does not personify front-runner. sent13: the limber is a kind of a coalescence if the germander does personify Piaget but it is not a kind of a coalescence. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is postural and is not a corkage is not right. sent15: the germander does not personify accession if that the specimen does personify accession but it is not a hegemony is not true. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it personifies rhinotomy and does discriminate is not right. sent17: the fact that the limber personifies rhinotomy is true. sent18: the germander is not univalve if the specimen is a coalescence and it is a switch-ivy. sent19: if something is a coalescence then that it is not a kind of a switch-ivy and it is not univalve does not hold. sent20: if there exists something such that that it personifies rhinotomy and it does not discriminate is not right then the limber does not personify front-runner.
sent11 & sent20 -> int1: the limber does not personify front-runner.; sent4 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the limber is postural hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the chatelaine is a kind of a corkage.
sent9 -> int3: the chatelaine is a corkage if it does personify front-runner.; sent7 -> int4: the fact that the chatelaine does personify front-runner and is postural hold if it is not univalve.; sent19 -> int5: the fact that the limber is not a switch-ivy and it is not univalve is wrong if it is a coalescence.; sent5 -> int6: if that the germander does not personify accession is not incorrect it does personify Piaget and is not a coalescence.;
$hypothesis$ = that the limber does not personify front-runner but it is postural is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does personify rhinotomy and is not discriminate. sent2: if there exists something such that it does not personify rhinotomy then the limber does not personify front-runner. sent3: if the fact that the limber is both not a switch-ivy and not univalve is not right then the chatelaine is not univalve. sent4: if the limber is a corkage then it is postural. sent5: something does personify Piaget but it is not a coalescence if it does not personify accession. sent6: something personifies front-runner and is a kind of a corkage if it is not univalve. sent7: something personifies front-runner and is not non-postural if it is not univalve. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is a corkage and it personifies front-runner does not hold. sent9: if something does personify front-runner it is a corkage. sent10: the limber is a corkage. sent11: there exists something such that that it personifies rhinotomy and does not discriminate does not hold. sent12: something is postural and does not personify front-runner. sent13: the limber is a kind of a coalescence if the germander does personify Piaget but it is not a kind of a coalescence. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is postural and is not a corkage is not right. sent15: the germander does not personify accession if that the specimen does personify accession but it is not a hegemony is not true. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it personifies rhinotomy and does discriminate is not right. sent17: the fact that the limber personifies rhinotomy is true. sent18: the germander is not univalve if the specimen is a coalescence and it is a switch-ivy. sent19: if something is a coalescence then that it is not a kind of a switch-ivy and it is not univalve does not hold. sent20: if there exists something such that that it personifies rhinotomy and it does not discriminate is not right then the limber does not personify front-runner. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent20 -> int1: the limber does not personify front-runner.; sent4 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the limber is postural hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__