the spanker damages teleconference.
sent1: that the ball is a Gallicanism and does not jag is incorrect. sent2: if something bethinks Capella it is not non-rickettsial. sent3: the fact that the tailrace bethinks Hammett and capitalizes EBV does not hold if there exists something such that it is reducible. sent4: the fact that the puppy is a Gallicanism that is not biliary is wrong if it is not a jag. sent5: the spanker is reducible. sent6: something does not bethink Hammett if that it bethink Hammett and capitalizes EBV is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is reducible and it does capitalize EBV is not true. sent8: the boxfish is not a Gallicanism if that there exists something such that the fact that it is a Gallicanism and it is not biliary does not hold is true. sent9: the fact that the tailrace is reducible is correct. sent10: that something is not reducible but it is slippery is false if it is not a kind of a Gallicanism. sent11: if that something is not reducible but it is slippery is not correct it is reducible. sent12: there is something such that it is monometallic and is a hairpiece. sent13: the tailrace does not capitalize EBV if something does not capitalize EBV. sent14: there is something such that it is not irreducible and it capitalizes EBV. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Gallicanism then that it does not damage teleconference and it does capitalize EBV does not hold. sent16: something does damage teleconference if that it bethinks Hammett is not incorrect. sent17: the puppy does not jag. sent18: if that the spanker does not bethink Hammett and it does not capitalize EBV does not hold the tailrace does damage teleconference. sent19: the ball is not a Gallicanism if the fact that it is both a Gallicanism and not a jag is wrong. sent20: the tailrace bethinks Hammett if the spanker does not capitalize EBV. sent21: if the spanker does not bethink Hammett the tailrace capitalizes EBV.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spanker does not bethink Hammett.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the tailrace does capitalize EBV.; sent16 -> int2: if the spanker does bethink Hammett it damages teleconference.;
the spanker does not damage teleconference.
sent6 -> int3: the tailrace does not bethink Hammett if the fact that it bethink Hammett and does capitalize EBV is false.; sent11 -> int4: the boxfish is reducible if that it is both not reducible and not nonslippery is wrong.; sent10 -> int5: if the boxfish is not a Gallicanism that it is both irreducible and slippery is not correct.; sent4 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the puppy is a Gallicanism but it is not biliary is false.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is a Gallicanism and not biliary is not right.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the boxfish is not a Gallicanism.; int5 & int8 -> int9: that the boxfish is not reducible but it is slippery is not true.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the boxfish is reducible.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is reducible is not incorrect.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the fact that the tailrace does bethink Hammett and does capitalize EBV is incorrect.; int3 & int12 -> int13: the tailrace does not bethink Hammett.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that that it does not bethink Hammett hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the spanker damages teleconference. ; $context$ = sent1: that the ball is a Gallicanism and does not jag is incorrect. sent2: if something bethinks Capella it is not non-rickettsial. sent3: the fact that the tailrace bethinks Hammett and capitalizes EBV does not hold if there exists something such that it is reducible. sent4: the fact that the puppy is a Gallicanism that is not biliary is wrong if it is not a jag. sent5: the spanker is reducible. sent6: something does not bethink Hammett if that it bethink Hammett and capitalizes EBV is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is reducible and it does capitalize EBV is not true. sent8: the boxfish is not a Gallicanism if that there exists something such that the fact that it is a Gallicanism and it is not biliary does not hold is true. sent9: the fact that the tailrace is reducible is correct. sent10: that something is not reducible but it is slippery is false if it is not a kind of a Gallicanism. sent11: if that something is not reducible but it is slippery is not correct it is reducible. sent12: there is something such that it is monometallic and is a hairpiece. sent13: the tailrace does not capitalize EBV if something does not capitalize EBV. sent14: there is something such that it is not irreducible and it capitalizes EBV. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Gallicanism then that it does not damage teleconference and it does capitalize EBV does not hold. sent16: something does damage teleconference if that it bethinks Hammett is not incorrect. sent17: the puppy does not jag. sent18: if that the spanker does not bethink Hammett and it does not capitalize EBV does not hold the tailrace does damage teleconference. sent19: the ball is not a Gallicanism if the fact that it is both a Gallicanism and not a jag is wrong. sent20: the tailrace bethinks Hammett if the spanker does not capitalize EBV. sent21: if the spanker does not bethink Hammett the tailrace capitalizes EBV. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spanker does not bethink Hammett.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the tailrace does capitalize EBV.; sent16 -> int2: if the spanker does bethink Hammett it damages teleconference.; __UNKNOWN__