the gatekeeper is not residential.
sent1: the gatekeeper is not productive if a residential thing assails Mankato. sent2: the bract does assail Mankato. sent3: there exists something such that it is residential and it does assail Mankato. sent4: something that is a kind of non-residential thing that does not assail Mankato is unproductive. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not unproductive and it assails Mankato then the gatekeeper is not residential. sent6: there is something such that it is a lenitive and is a siamese. sent7: if that something is nonparticulate and flies is false it is not nonparticulate. sent8: the presentist is dangerous and it does incriminate Centaurium. sent9: if the abelmosk is downstream the eyebrow does assail reprehensibility. sent10: the cocuswood is not a cyclooxygenase-2 if there exists something such that that it whoops and it is a kind of a cyclooxygenase-2 does not hold. sent11: the abelmosk is downstream and it is zygodactyl. sent12: if there is something such that it assails reprehensibility then the fact that the gatekeeper is nonparticulate and it is a flying is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the gatekeeper is not productive hold. sent14: there exists something such that it is a heterosexual. sent15: if something that does assail Mankato is residential then the gatekeeper is not productive. sent16: the blueprint is unexpansive and it is residential. sent17: the clothespin is productive. sent18: The Mankato does assail bract. sent19: if there is something such that it is not nonparticulate then the fact that the bract does whoop and is a cyclooxygenase-2 is not true. sent20: the bract is residential. sent21: something is not residential and does not assail Mankato if it is not a kind of a cyclooxygenase-2. sent22: the bract does not incriminate Fuller. sent23: the bract is productive.
sent23 & sent2 -> int1: that the bract is productive and assails Mankato is right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of productive thing that does assail Mankato.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the cocuswood is productive.
sent4 -> int3: if the cocuswood is not residential and does not assail Mankato it is productive.; sent21 -> int4: if the cocuswood is not a kind of a cyclooxygenase-2 it is nonresidential and it does not assail Mankato.; sent7 -> int5: the gatekeeper is not nonparticulate if the fact that it is nonparticulate and it flies does not hold.; sent11 -> int6: the abelmosk is downstream.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the eyebrow assails reprehensibility.; int7 -> int8: something assails reprehensibility.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the fact that the gatekeeper is nonparticulate and it does fly is not correct.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the gatekeeper is not nonparticulate.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not nonparticulate.; int11 & sent19 -> int12: that the bract is a whoop and it is a cyclooxygenase-2 does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a whoop and it is a kind of a cyclooxygenase-2 does not hold.; int13 & sent10 -> int14: the cocuswood is not a cyclooxygenase-2.; int4 & int14 -> int15: the cocuswood is not residential and it does not assail Mankato.; int3 & int15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the gatekeeper is not residential. ; $context$ = sent1: the gatekeeper is not productive if a residential thing assails Mankato. sent2: the bract does assail Mankato. sent3: there exists something such that it is residential and it does assail Mankato. sent4: something that is a kind of non-residential thing that does not assail Mankato is unproductive. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not unproductive and it assails Mankato then the gatekeeper is not residential. sent6: there is something such that it is a lenitive and is a siamese. sent7: if that something is nonparticulate and flies is false it is not nonparticulate. sent8: the presentist is dangerous and it does incriminate Centaurium. sent9: if the abelmosk is downstream the eyebrow does assail reprehensibility. sent10: the cocuswood is not a cyclooxygenase-2 if there exists something such that that it whoops and it is a kind of a cyclooxygenase-2 does not hold. sent11: the abelmosk is downstream and it is zygodactyl. sent12: if there is something such that it assails reprehensibility then the fact that the gatekeeper is nonparticulate and it is a flying is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the gatekeeper is not productive hold. sent14: there exists something such that it is a heterosexual. sent15: if something that does assail Mankato is residential then the gatekeeper is not productive. sent16: the blueprint is unexpansive and it is residential. sent17: the clothespin is productive. sent18: The Mankato does assail bract. sent19: if there is something such that it is not nonparticulate then the fact that the bract does whoop and is a cyclooxygenase-2 is not true. sent20: the bract is residential. sent21: something is not residential and does not assail Mankato if it is not a kind of a cyclooxygenase-2. sent22: the bract does not incriminate Fuller. sent23: the bract is productive. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 & sent2 -> int1: that the bract is productive and assails Mankato is right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of productive thing that does assail Mankato.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__