there is something such that if it is not rabbinical then it is both not a Humulus and a Garand.
sent1: that the Colbert is non-centrifugal and the Garand if the Colbert is not a letters is correct. sent2: there is something such that if it is not rabbinical then it is a Humulus and it is a kind of a Garand. sent3: there is something such that if it is not rabbinical it is not a Humulus. sent4: if the eyewitness is not rabbinical then it is not a Humulus and is a Garand. sent5: the archivist does not plank but it is a Humulus if it does not edge maildrop. sent6: there is something such that if it does not digitize Colbert it is not acapnic and it is a flue. sent7: if the eyewitness is not rabbinical it is a Humulus and it is a Garand. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a benzene hold it is intracerebral and it does digitize frozen. sent9: something is not a mailbag but a cooked if it is not a beaker. sent10: something does not edge shape-up but it edges monohydrate if the fact that it is not thermoelectric is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it is rabbinical it is not a Humulus and it is a Garand. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a nettle it is distributional. sent13: if the eyewitness is not a superior then it is not an aquatic and it lobs Raphidae. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a multiplicity it is a exercycle and it is appellate. sent15: if the eyewitness is rabbinical then it is not a Humulus and it is a kind of a Garand. sent16: something does not lob Hirudo but it is unawares if it is not figurative. sent17: the eyewitness is a kind of a Garand if it is not rabbinical. sent18: there is something such that if it is not rabbinical then it is a kind of a Garand.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
the trackball is not a mailbag but it cooks if it is not a beaker.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not rabbinical then it is both not a Humulus and a Garand. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Colbert is non-centrifugal and the Garand if the Colbert is not a letters is correct. sent2: there is something such that if it is not rabbinical then it is a Humulus and it is a kind of a Garand. sent3: there is something such that if it is not rabbinical it is not a Humulus. sent4: if the eyewitness is not rabbinical then it is not a Humulus and is a Garand. sent5: the archivist does not plank but it is a Humulus if it does not edge maildrop. sent6: there is something such that if it does not digitize Colbert it is not acapnic and it is a flue. sent7: if the eyewitness is not rabbinical it is a Humulus and it is a Garand. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a benzene hold it is intracerebral and it does digitize frozen. sent9: something is not a mailbag but a cooked if it is not a beaker. sent10: something does not edge shape-up but it edges monohydrate if the fact that it is not thermoelectric is right. sent11: there exists something such that if it is rabbinical it is not a Humulus and it is a Garand. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a nettle it is distributional. sent13: if the eyewitness is not a superior then it is not an aquatic and it lobs Raphidae. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a multiplicity it is a exercycle and it is appellate. sent15: if the eyewitness is rabbinical then it is not a Humulus and it is a kind of a Garand. sent16: something does not lob Hirudo but it is unawares if it is not figurative. sent17: the eyewitness is a kind of a Garand if it is not rabbinical. sent18: there is something such that if it is not rabbinical then it is a kind of a Garand. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__