the coeducation does not occur.
sent1: that the Revelation does not occur is right. sent2: the fact that that the jetting Tanakh and the evanescing happens is caused by that the boarding Herodotus does not occur hold. sent3: if both the evanescing and the boarding Herodotus happens the coeducation does not occur. sent4: the bracteateness does not occur. sent5: the exponential is brought about by that the justification occurs. sent6: that the evanescing happens is brought about by that the jetting Tanakh occurs. sent7: the boarding lady happens. sent8: the jetting Tanakh is triggered by the exponentialness. sent9: the boarding Herodotus but not the protrusion occurs if the accordance does not occur. sent10: the abstracting occurs. sent11: that the accordance does not occur and the abstracting occurs is triggered by that the boarding lady occurs. sent12: the helming happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the justification does not occur.; sent4 & sent12 -> int1: both the non-bracteateness and the helm occurs.; sent11 & sent7 -> int2: that not the accordance but the abstracting occurs hold.; int2 -> int3: the accordance does not occur.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the boarding Herodotus occurs and the protrusion does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the boarding Herodotus occurs.;
the coeducation happens.
$hypothesis$ = the coeducation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Revelation does not occur is right. sent2: the fact that that the jetting Tanakh and the evanescing happens is caused by that the boarding Herodotus does not occur hold. sent3: if both the evanescing and the boarding Herodotus happens the coeducation does not occur. sent4: the bracteateness does not occur. sent5: the exponential is brought about by that the justification occurs. sent6: that the evanescing happens is brought about by that the jetting Tanakh occurs. sent7: the boarding lady happens. sent8: the jetting Tanakh is triggered by the exponentialness. sent9: the boarding Herodotus but not the protrusion occurs if the accordance does not occur. sent10: the abstracting occurs. sent11: that the accordance does not occur and the abstracting occurs is triggered by that the boarding lady occurs. sent12: the helming happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the justification does not occur.; sent4 & sent12 -> int1: both the non-bracteateness and the helm occurs.; sent11 & sent7 -> int2: that not the accordance but the abstracting occurs hold.; int2 -> int3: the accordance does not occur.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the boarding Herodotus occurs and the protrusion does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the boarding Herodotus occurs.; __UNKNOWN__