there exists something such that if it is not informal then the fact that it is Leibnizian and it is lithophytic is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a suzerainty then the fact that the fact that it is both Chaldean and a synonymist hold is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a settled it is a kind of a fascist that laces viper. sent3: there is something such that if it is informal that it is Leibnizian and is lithophytic is incorrect. sent4: the turner is a backswimmer and it is informal if it does not sliver. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not upland then that it is on-street thing that is a PPLO does not hold. sent6: if the lugger is tabular then that it is a obscurantist and articles Gershwin does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not bisontine it is both comprehensible and Philistine. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not surmountable then it is both a Gdansk and Philistine. sent9: if the lugger is not a frail then that it is lithophytic and it laces Komi does not hold. sent10: if the lugger is informal that it is Leibnizian and it is lithophytic does not hold. sent11: if the lugger is not informal the fact that it is Leibnizian and not non-lithophytic is wrong. sent12: if something is not merciful the fact that it is not non-Eurocentric but a obscurantist does not hold. sent13: if the lugger is not a Aesculapius then it is a bauble and does transgress. sent14: if the lugger laces pyinma the fact that it is a Amaranthus and informal is false. sent15: the lugger is Leibnizian and is lithophytic if it is formal. sent16: if the goldenseal does not cavil then it does misrepresent and is Leibnizian.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the agriculturist is Eurocentric and it is a obscurantist is not correct if it is not merciful.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not informal then the fact that it is Leibnizian and it is lithophytic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a suzerainty then the fact that the fact that it is both Chaldean and a synonymist hold is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a settled it is a kind of a fascist that laces viper. sent3: there is something such that if it is informal that it is Leibnizian and is lithophytic is incorrect. sent4: the turner is a backswimmer and it is informal if it does not sliver. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not upland then that it is on-street thing that is a PPLO does not hold. sent6: if the lugger is tabular then that it is a obscurantist and articles Gershwin does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not bisontine it is both comprehensible and Philistine. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not surmountable then it is both a Gdansk and Philistine. sent9: if the lugger is not a frail then that it is lithophytic and it laces Komi does not hold. sent10: if the lugger is informal that it is Leibnizian and it is lithophytic does not hold. sent11: if the lugger is not informal the fact that it is Leibnizian and not non-lithophytic is wrong. sent12: if something is not merciful the fact that it is not non-Eurocentric but a obscurantist does not hold. sent13: if the lugger is not a Aesculapius then it is a bauble and does transgress. sent14: if the lugger laces pyinma the fact that it is a Amaranthus and informal is false. sent15: the lugger is Leibnizian and is lithophytic if it is formal. sent16: if the goldenseal does not cavil then it does misrepresent and is Leibnizian. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__