the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Ionian that it does draw cabana and it is not unmusical is not correct does not hold.
sent1: the fact that that the personality does draw cabana but it is not unmusical is wrong hold if it is a kind of a Ionian. sent2: if the personality is a Ionian then it is a profit and it is not a kind of a glutethimide. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of an archery but it is not a kind of a trajectory does not hold if it is categorical. sent4: if the personality is a Ionian the fact that it does evaporate and is not meager does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is undramatic the fact that it comforts jazzman and it is neurophysiological is false. sent6: that the personality is an inhaler but it does not draw cabana is not right if it is a chemical. sent7: if the cabana is abyssal then that it evaporates and it is not a hobnail is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a caldron the fact that it reflectorizes personality and is a Mormons does not hold. sent9: if the personality does comfort jazzman that it is a Samarkand that does not cone is not true. sent10: there is something such that if it does draw jewfish that it is a Eburophyton but not a Tabernacle is incorrect. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a preventive then that it is a kind of a lancers and it is not a kind of a Mauritanian is not right hold.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is categorical hold the fact that it is a kind of an archery and it is not a trajectory is not right.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the jewfish is an archery but it is not a trajectory does not hold if it is categorical.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Ionian that it does draw cabana and it is not unmusical is not correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the personality does draw cabana but it is not unmusical is wrong hold if it is a kind of a Ionian. sent2: if the personality is a Ionian then it is a profit and it is not a kind of a glutethimide. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of an archery but it is not a kind of a trajectory does not hold if it is categorical. sent4: if the personality is a Ionian the fact that it does evaporate and is not meager does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is undramatic the fact that it comforts jazzman and it is neurophysiological is false. sent6: that the personality is an inhaler but it does not draw cabana is not right if it is a chemical. sent7: if the cabana is abyssal then that it evaporates and it is not a hobnail is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a caldron the fact that it reflectorizes personality and is a Mormons does not hold. sent9: if the personality does comfort jazzman that it is a Samarkand that does not cone is not true. sent10: there is something such that if it does draw jewfish that it is a Eburophyton but not a Tabernacle is incorrect. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a preventive then that it is a kind of a lancers and it is not a kind of a Mauritanian is not right hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__