the cascarilla is philatelic.
sent1: that something is a kind of non-Algonquian thing that does not insert Haganah is not correct if it is not bistroic. sent2: if something is not non-bistroic that it is a kind of a defect that is not a Niagara is wrong. sent3: if the cascarilla does not defect it is philatelic. sent4: the cascarilla is not a kind of a flatlet. sent5: if the fact that something defects but it is not a Niagara is not right it is philatelic. sent6: if the fact that something is non-Algonquian thing that does not insert Haganah is incorrect it is a kind of a flatlet.
sent1 -> int1: if the cascarilla is not bistroic that it is not a Algonquian and does not insert Haganah is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cascarilla is not bistroic is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the cascarilla is not a kind of a Algonquian and it does not insert Haganah is false.; sent6 -> int3: if the fact that the cascarilla is not Algonquian and it does not insert Haganah is false then it is a flatlet.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cascarilla is a kind of a flatlet.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cascarilla is bistroic.; sent2 -> int7: that the cascarilla is a defect but it is not a Niagara is false if it is bistroic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the cascarilla is a kind of a defect that is not a kind of a Niagara is incorrect.; sent5 -> int9: the cascarilla is philatelic if the fact that it is a kind of a defect and it is not a Niagara is not true.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the cascarilla is philatelic. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a kind of non-Algonquian thing that does not insert Haganah is not correct if it is not bistroic. sent2: if something is not non-bistroic that it is a kind of a defect that is not a Niagara is wrong. sent3: if the cascarilla does not defect it is philatelic. sent4: the cascarilla is not a kind of a flatlet. sent5: if the fact that something defects but it is not a Niagara is not right it is philatelic. sent6: if the fact that something is non-Algonquian thing that does not insert Haganah is incorrect it is a kind of a flatlet. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the cascarilla is not bistroic that it is not a Algonquian and does not insert Haganah is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cascarilla is not bistroic is not wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the cascarilla is not a kind of a Algonquian and it does not insert Haganah is false.; sent6 -> int3: if the fact that the cascarilla is not Algonquian and it does not insert Haganah is false then it is a flatlet.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cascarilla is a kind of a flatlet.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the cascarilla is bistroic.; sent2 -> int7: that the cascarilla is a defect but it is not a Niagara is false if it is bistroic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the cascarilla is a kind of a defect that is not a kind of a Niagara is incorrect.; sent5 -> int9: the cascarilla is philatelic if the fact that it is a kind of a defect and it is not a Niagara is not true.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__