the fact that there is something such that it does not complect irredentism is false.
sent1: if something is not an avocet then that it is not tropical but a gather is false. sent2: that the aphanite is tropical thing that is a gather does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a misfortune and it does not complect basileus does not hold the aphanite is not an avocet. sent4: the CAD is noninheritable if it is not a misfortune and does not complect basileus. sent5: the fact that the CAD gloms aphanite and does not defoliate CAD is not false. sent6: the fact that something is tropical and does gather is wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of an avocet is not false. sent7: the CAD is inheritable if it gloms aphanite and does defoliate CAD. sent8: if something does defoliate blowout and is not a misfortune it is a Sufi. sent9: something does not complect irredentism if the fact that it is not tropical and it is a kind of a gather is not correct. sent10: the fact that the CAD is inheritable is right if it does glom aphanite and does not defoliate CAD. sent11: if the aphanite is tropical then it does not complect irredentism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the CAD is not a misfortune and does not complect basileus.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the CAD is not inheritable is right.; sent10 & sent5 -> int2: the CAD is inheritable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the CAD is not a kind of a misfortune and does not complect basileus is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a misfortune and it does not complect basileus is not right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the aphanite is not a kind of an avocet.; sent1 -> int7: if the aphanite is not an avocet then that it is not tropical and it is a gather is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the aphanite is a kind of non-tropical thing that does gather is wrong.; sent9 -> int9: if the fact that the aphanite is not tropical and is a gather is not true it does not complect irredentism.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the aphanite does not complect irredentism.; int10 -> hypothesis;
if that the Croesus defoliates blowout and is not a misfortune hold it is a Sufi.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it does not complect irredentism is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not an avocet then that it is not tropical but a gather is false. sent2: that the aphanite is tropical thing that is a gather does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a misfortune and it does not complect basileus does not hold the aphanite is not an avocet. sent4: the CAD is noninheritable if it is not a misfortune and does not complect basileus. sent5: the fact that the CAD gloms aphanite and does not defoliate CAD is not false. sent6: the fact that something is tropical and does gather is wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of an avocet is not false. sent7: the CAD is inheritable if it gloms aphanite and does defoliate CAD. sent8: if something does defoliate blowout and is not a misfortune it is a Sufi. sent9: something does not complect irredentism if the fact that it is not tropical and it is a kind of a gather is not correct. sent10: the fact that the CAD is inheritable is right if it does glom aphanite and does not defoliate CAD. sent11: if the aphanite is tropical then it does not complect irredentism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the CAD is not a misfortune and does not complect basileus.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the CAD is not inheritable is right.; sent10 & sent5 -> int2: the CAD is inheritable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the CAD is not a kind of a misfortune and does not complect basileus is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a misfortune and it does not complect basileus is not right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the aphanite is not a kind of an avocet.; sent1 -> int7: if the aphanite is not an avocet then that it is not tropical and it is a gather is not right.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the aphanite is a kind of non-tropical thing that does gather is wrong.; sent9 -> int9: if the fact that the aphanite is not tropical and is a gather is not true it does not complect irredentism.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the aphanite does not complect irredentism.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__