that the roll does not rick is not incorrect.
sent1: the roll is a wok if the kaoliang does not rick. sent2: something does rick if it is hyperemic. sent3: the kaoliang is hyperemic. sent4: if the fact that the pudge is not hyperemic hold the kaoliang is a wok. sent5: the fact that if the fact that there exists something such that it is a wok and/or it does smock cytomembrane is not incorrect then the roll does not rick is not false. sent6: that the kaoliang ricks hold. sent7: the pudge is not hyperemic. sent8: there is something such that it is a wok and/or it is hyperemic. sent9: if something does smock cytomembrane then that the roll does not rick is right.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the kaoliang is a kind of a wok.; int1 -> int2: the kaoliang is a wok and/or smocks cytomembrane.; int2 -> int3: the fact that something is a wok and/or smocks cytomembrane is not wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the roll does rick.
sent2 -> int4: if the roll is hyperemic then it does rick.;
$hypothesis$ = that the roll does not rick is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the roll is a wok if the kaoliang does not rick. sent2: something does rick if it is hyperemic. sent3: the kaoliang is hyperemic. sent4: if the fact that the pudge is not hyperemic hold the kaoliang is a wok. sent5: the fact that if the fact that there exists something such that it is a wok and/or it does smock cytomembrane is not incorrect then the roll does not rick is not false. sent6: that the kaoliang ricks hold. sent7: the pudge is not hyperemic. sent8: there is something such that it is a wok and/or it is hyperemic. sent9: if something does smock cytomembrane then that the roll does not rick is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the kaoliang is a kind of a wok.; int1 -> int2: the kaoliang is a wok and/or smocks cytomembrane.; int2 -> int3: the fact that something is a wok and/or smocks cytomembrane is not wrong.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__