the spellbinder does not lag grader.
sent1: the grader is a Meissner. sent2: the maggot does lag hygiene. sent3: if the spellbinder does follow skank the blastomycete is a kind of a Meissner. sent4: something does lag grader if it is a Meissner. sent5: if the prefect is a kind of a Chenopodium the wheelwork is a Chenopodium. sent6: if there is something such that it surprises electrolytic that the cuckoopint is not syllogistic is true. sent7: the myelogram is a Meissner. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is brotherly and it is a Meissner is not correct then the crusher is not a kind of a Meissner. sent9: if something does follow skank then it is a kind of a Meissner. sent10: if something is not syllogistic then that it is a kind of brotherly thing that is a kind of a Meissner is not true. sent11: the maggot does follow skank. sent12: the maggot lags grader. sent13: the bather does blaspheme salol if the wheelwork is a kind of a Chenopodium. sent14: that the spellbinder lags grader hold if the maggot is a Meissner. sent15: there is something such that it blasphemes airiness. sent16: if something blasphemes salol it does surprise electrolytic. sent17: the fact that the prefect is a Chenopodium is right if the fact that the ball is a kind of a Chenopodium that does not blaspheme airiness does not hold. sent18: the fact that the ball is a Chenopodium that does not blaspheme airiness is not right if there exists something such that it blaspheme airiness. sent19: if the crusher is not brotherly and does not follow skank then the spellbinder follow skank. sent20: the fact that the maggot does lag grader hold if the spellbinder follows skank. sent21: The skank does follow maggot.
sent9 -> int1: the maggot is a Meissner if it does follow skank.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the maggot is a kind of a Meissner.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the spellbinder does not lag grader.
sent10 -> int3: that if the cuckoopint is not syllogistic then the fact that that the cuckoopint is both not non-brotherly and a Meissner is not incorrect is wrong is not false.; sent16 -> int4: that if the bather blasphemes salol the bather does surprise electrolytic is not incorrect.; sent15 & sent18 -> int5: the fact that the ball is a Chenopodium and does not blaspheme airiness is wrong.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the prefect is a Chenopodium.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the wheelwork is a Chenopodium is not incorrect.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the bather blasphemes salol.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the bather does surprise electrolytic.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it surprises electrolytic.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the cuckoopint is not syllogistic.; int3 & int11 -> int12: that the cuckoopint is a kind of brotherly thing that is a kind of a Meissner is false.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is brotherly and a Meissner does not hold.; int13 & sent8 -> int14: the crusher is not a Meissner.;
$hypothesis$ = the spellbinder does not lag grader. ; $context$ = sent1: the grader is a Meissner. sent2: the maggot does lag hygiene. sent3: if the spellbinder does follow skank the blastomycete is a kind of a Meissner. sent4: something does lag grader if it is a Meissner. sent5: if the prefect is a kind of a Chenopodium the wheelwork is a Chenopodium. sent6: if there is something such that it surprises electrolytic that the cuckoopint is not syllogistic is true. sent7: the myelogram is a Meissner. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is brotherly and it is a Meissner is not correct then the crusher is not a kind of a Meissner. sent9: if something does follow skank then it is a kind of a Meissner. sent10: if something is not syllogistic then that it is a kind of brotherly thing that is a kind of a Meissner is not true. sent11: the maggot does follow skank. sent12: the maggot lags grader. sent13: the bather does blaspheme salol if the wheelwork is a kind of a Chenopodium. sent14: that the spellbinder lags grader hold if the maggot is a Meissner. sent15: there is something such that it blasphemes airiness. sent16: if something blasphemes salol it does surprise electrolytic. sent17: the fact that the prefect is a Chenopodium is right if the fact that the ball is a kind of a Chenopodium that does not blaspheme airiness does not hold. sent18: the fact that the ball is a Chenopodium that does not blaspheme airiness is not right if there exists something such that it blaspheme airiness. sent19: if the crusher is not brotherly and does not follow skank then the spellbinder follow skank. sent20: the fact that the maggot does lag grader hold if the spellbinder follows skank. sent21: The skank does follow maggot. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the maggot is a Meissner if it does follow skank.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the maggot is a kind of a Meissner.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__