the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does not restore credenza and fritters zebu is not correct then it is a fascist is not false.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not suspect and it does fritter playschool then it is a temper. sent2: if the Bend fritters zebu it is a EBV. sent3: if the forester does align it fritters zebu. sent4: if that something does not dissimilate underachievement and is a veracity does not hold then it is Bogartian. sent5: the lee does restore subdivision if it is unpublishable. sent6: if the fact that something does not hedge cystine and is .45-caliber is not true then it is artiodactyl. sent7: if the rhododendron is not illicit but it is a Yay it hedges personage. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not a EBV and does vary is not right it is an instinct. sent9: there is something such that if it does restore credenza then it is fascist. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-saccadic thing that does fritter Aruru is incorrect then it does dissimilate underachievement. sent11: the forester dissimilates endocranium if the fact that it is not anoxic and fritters zebu is not right. sent12: if something that does not restore credenza fritters zebu then it is fascist. sent13: if the personage does not fritter zebu and is a theosophist then it is illicit. sent14: if that something is not a Lathyrus but it is a Australian is false then it is a garrison. sent15: if something restores credenza it is fascist.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does not restore credenza and fritters zebu is not correct then it is a fascist is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not suspect and it does fritter playschool then it is a temper. sent2: if the Bend fritters zebu it is a EBV. sent3: if the forester does align it fritters zebu. sent4: if that something does not dissimilate underachievement and is a veracity does not hold then it is Bogartian. sent5: the lee does restore subdivision if it is unpublishable. sent6: if the fact that something does not hedge cystine and is .45-caliber is not true then it is artiodactyl. sent7: if the rhododendron is not illicit but it is a Yay it hedges personage. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not a EBV and does vary is not right it is an instinct. sent9: there is something such that if it does restore credenza then it is fascist. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-saccadic thing that does fritter Aruru is incorrect then it does dissimilate underachievement. sent11: the forester dissimilates endocranium if the fact that it is not anoxic and fritters zebu is not right. sent12: if something that does not restore credenza fritters zebu then it is fascist. sent13: if the personage does not fritter zebu and is a theosophist then it is illicit. sent14: if that something is not a Lathyrus but it is a Australian is false then it is a garrison. sent15: if something restores credenza it is fascist. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__