the frog is not Sumerian.
sent1: the commune is not instructional if the frog does not glamorize blanketed and concretizes brink. sent2: the commune does not madden Thessalonian and it is not instructional. sent3: the frog is not a kind of a Sumerian if the commune is not a smoothed and it is not a molarity. sent4: the workbasket maddens Thessalonian if the fact that the commune is both Sumerian and not a molarity is not false. sent5: that if the frog concretizes Slav the frog does not glamorize blanketed and does concretize brink hold. sent6: if the commune smooths the fact that it maddens Thessalonian is correct. sent7: everything is not a molarity and does not glamorize blanketed.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the commune smooths.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the commune maddens Thessalonian.; sent2 -> int2: the commune does not madden Thessalonian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the commune is not a smoothed.; sent7 -> int5: the commune is not a molarity and does not glamorize blanketed.; int5 -> int6: the commune is not a molarity.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the commune is not a smoothed and is not a kind of a molarity.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the workbasket is not smoothed and not chemiluminescent.
$hypothesis$ = the frog is not Sumerian. ; $context$ = sent1: the commune is not instructional if the frog does not glamorize blanketed and concretizes brink. sent2: the commune does not madden Thessalonian and it is not instructional. sent3: the frog is not a kind of a Sumerian if the commune is not a smoothed and it is not a molarity. sent4: the workbasket maddens Thessalonian if the fact that the commune is both Sumerian and not a molarity is not false. sent5: that if the frog concretizes Slav the frog does not glamorize blanketed and does concretize brink hold. sent6: if the commune smooths the fact that it maddens Thessalonian is correct. sent7: everything is not a molarity and does not glamorize blanketed. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the commune smooths.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the commune maddens Thessalonian.; sent2 -> int2: the commune does not madden Thessalonian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the commune is not a smoothed.; sent7 -> int5: the commune is not a molarity and does not glamorize blanketed.; int5 -> int6: the commune is not a molarity.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the commune is not a smoothed and is not a kind of a molarity.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__