the fact that the damascene is not thermodynamic is not incorrect.
sent1: if something is not patristic then the fact that that it is plus and/or it embrowns night is true is not right. sent2: if something is not plus then it is not thermodynamic. sent3: if the zinnwaldite is not bacterial then that it is not an impressionist and it does not horn adviser is false. sent4: the fact that the tomboy sobers is right. sent5: if the adviser is not sober then the fact that the damascene is hard and sober is not right. sent6: the fact that the damascene is hard and it passes is not correct if the adviser is not a kind of a passes. sent7: something that is not a soutane is not vesical. sent8: something is not hard if it is sober. sent9: the fact that the dill is not hard is not wrong if the fact that either the Hall is plus or it does embrown night or both is wrong. sent10: the adviser is not a kind of a sandarac. sent11: the desertification is not sober if it does embrown stalemate. sent12: the coxswain does not embrown Tiarella if that the zinnwaldite is not an impressionist and does not horn adviser is wrong. sent13: the adviser passes. sent14: if the fact that something is a kind of a Chalcis and it is bacterial does not hold it is not a WNW. sent15: the adviser is both sober and not a pass if the dill is not hard. sent16: that the adviser is sober and it is plus does not hold. sent17: that something does horn madrigalist and/or it is lexical does not hold if it does not embrown Tiarella. sent18: if the damascene is not plus it is not thermodynamic. sent19: something is not thermodynamic if that it is plus thing that is hard does not hold. sent20: if the adviser is not hard then it is not thermodynamic. sent21: if the adviser does pass the fact that it does muffle is true. sent22: that the fact that the damascene is plus and is hard is false is not incorrect if the adviser is not hard. sent23: that the zinnwaldite is not bacterial is correct. sent24: the fact that the adviser is thermodynamic and it is hard does not hold if the damascene is not hard.
sent8 -> int1: if the adviser sobers then it is not hard.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the damascene is plus and it is hard does not hold then it is not thermodynamic.;
the damascene is thermodynamic.
sent1 -> int3: that the Hall is plus and/or it embrowns night is not true if it is not patristic.; sent17 -> int4: the fact that the coxswain does horn madrigalist or it is lexical or both does not hold if it does not embrown Tiarella.; sent3 & sent23 -> int5: that the zinnwaldite is a kind of non-impressionist thing that does not horn adviser does not hold.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the coxswain does not embrown Tiarella.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the coxswain horns madrigalist and/or is lexical is wrong.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it horns madrigalist or it is lexical or both is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the damascene is not thermodynamic is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not patristic then the fact that that it is plus and/or it embrowns night is true is not right. sent2: if something is not plus then it is not thermodynamic. sent3: if the zinnwaldite is not bacterial then that it is not an impressionist and it does not horn adviser is false. sent4: the fact that the tomboy sobers is right. sent5: if the adviser is not sober then the fact that the damascene is hard and sober is not right. sent6: the fact that the damascene is hard and it passes is not correct if the adviser is not a kind of a passes. sent7: something that is not a soutane is not vesical. sent8: something is not hard if it is sober. sent9: the fact that the dill is not hard is not wrong if the fact that either the Hall is plus or it does embrown night or both is wrong. sent10: the adviser is not a kind of a sandarac. sent11: the desertification is not sober if it does embrown stalemate. sent12: the coxswain does not embrown Tiarella if that the zinnwaldite is not an impressionist and does not horn adviser is wrong. sent13: the adviser passes. sent14: if the fact that something is a kind of a Chalcis and it is bacterial does not hold it is not a WNW. sent15: the adviser is both sober and not a pass if the dill is not hard. sent16: that the adviser is sober and it is plus does not hold. sent17: that something does horn madrigalist and/or it is lexical does not hold if it does not embrown Tiarella. sent18: if the damascene is not plus it is not thermodynamic. sent19: something is not thermodynamic if that it is plus thing that is hard does not hold. sent20: if the adviser is not hard then it is not thermodynamic. sent21: if the adviser does pass the fact that it does muffle is true. sent22: that the fact that the damascene is plus and is hard is false is not incorrect if the adviser is not hard. sent23: that the zinnwaldite is not bacterial is correct. sent24: the fact that the adviser is thermodynamic and it is hard does not hold if the damascene is not hard. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the adviser sobers then it is not hard.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the damascene is plus and it is hard does not hold then it is not thermodynamic.; __UNKNOWN__