the fact that the bullfight is a backpack and it is a kind of a dazzle is correct.
sent1: the bullfight is not a kind of a separate. sent2: that if the fact that something does not seek bullfight and it does not separate is not right then it is not legato is not wrong. sent3: a normative thing does not seek bullfight. sent4: the fact that the heir is a dazzle and is normative does not hold. sent5: if the linguist is not inflationary and/or it is normative that it is Solomonic hold. sent6: if the bouquet is not legato the fact that the heir is not a Benny but pharmacological is incorrect. sent7: that the heir is not a backpack and it does not seek bullfight does not hold if there is something such that it is a Benny. sent8: if the heir is not a dazzle the bullfight is a backpack and a dazzle. sent9: if the heir does not seek bullfight then the linguist does seek bullfight. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not non-Solomonic the fact that the bouquet does not seek bullfight and is not non-inflationary is not correct. sent11: that the heir is a Benny and it is inflationary is wrong. sent12: if the bullfight does separate it dazzles. sent13: the linguist is not inflationary or it is normative or both. sent14: that the bouquet does not seek bullfight and is not a separate is not true if there is something such that it is Solomonic. sent15: if that the bullfight is not a kind of a backpack but it is normative is incorrect the fact that it is not Solomonic is right.
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the linguist is Solomonic.; int1 -> int2: something is Solomonic.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the bouquet does not seek bullfight and is not separate is not correct.; sent2 -> int4: the bouquet is non-legato if the fact that it does not seek bullfight and it is not a separate is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bouquet is non-legato.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that that the heir is not a Benny but it is pharmacological is incorrect hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bullfight is a backpack and it is a kind of a dazzle is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the bullfight is not a kind of a separate. sent2: that if the fact that something does not seek bullfight and it does not separate is not right then it is not legato is not wrong. sent3: a normative thing does not seek bullfight. sent4: the fact that the heir is a dazzle and is normative does not hold. sent5: if the linguist is not inflationary and/or it is normative that it is Solomonic hold. sent6: if the bouquet is not legato the fact that the heir is not a Benny but pharmacological is incorrect. sent7: that the heir is not a backpack and it does not seek bullfight does not hold if there is something such that it is a Benny. sent8: if the heir is not a dazzle the bullfight is a backpack and a dazzle. sent9: if the heir does not seek bullfight then the linguist does seek bullfight. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not non-Solomonic the fact that the bouquet does not seek bullfight and is not non-inflationary is not correct. sent11: that the heir is a Benny and it is inflationary is wrong. sent12: if the bullfight does separate it dazzles. sent13: the linguist is not inflationary or it is normative or both. sent14: that the bouquet does not seek bullfight and is not a separate is not true if there is something such that it is Solomonic. sent15: if that the bullfight is not a kind of a backpack but it is normative is incorrect the fact that it is not Solomonic is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: the linguist is Solomonic.; int1 -> int2: something is Solomonic.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the bouquet does not seek bullfight and is not separate is not correct.; sent2 -> int4: the bouquet is non-legato if the fact that it does not seek bullfight and it is not a separate is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bouquet is non-legato.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the fact that that the heir is not a Benny but it is pharmacological is incorrect hold.; __UNKNOWN__