the killer does not arrogate germander.
sent1: if the catkin is other then the cote is other. sent2: if something is a Astor then it does arrogate germander. sent3: a non-ecclesiastical thing is not a tarsal but flaky. sent4: the pollard is a kind of a Heinz that guarantees Harlem if it does not dissent joss. sent5: if that that the savior is ecclesiastical but it is not flaky is wrong hold the fact that the killer does process edict is not incorrect. sent6: if the Doberman does not process edict then that the killer does arrogate germander and it is ecclesiastical does not hold. sent7: if the catkin is upmarket then the cote is other. sent8: if the savior arrogates germander it is flaky. sent9: if something is other it either processes edict or does not guarantee vineyard or both. sent10: the pollard does not dissent joss. sent11: the panhandler is flaky. sent12: if the catkin is not a Heinz then the fact that either it is other or it is upmarket or both is not incorrect. sent13: if the fact that the savior is not ecclesiastical is not wrong then the killer does process edict. sent14: the joss is both non-tarsal and non-flaky if the savior is not ecclesiastical. sent15: the killer does not arrogate germander if the savior is non-tarsal and not non-flaky. sent16: if that something is not a Astor but it does process edict is not right then it is not ecclesiastical. sent17: the panhandler is a kind of a tarsal. sent18: if there is something such that it is a tarsal then that the savior is ecclesiastical and is not flaky is not correct. sent19: if the killer does process edict it is a Astor. sent20: the fact that the savior processes extinction hold. sent21: the cote is not upmarket. sent22: if the fact that the cote is not upmarket is not false then that it does not guarantee vineyard and it is other does not hold. sent23: if the pollard is a Heinz then the catkin is not a Heinz.
sent17 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a tarsal.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the savior is ecclesiastical but it is not flaky is not true.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the killer processes edict hold.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the killer is a kind of a Astor.; sent2 -> int5: if that the killer is a Astor is not incorrect then it arrogates germander.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the killer does not arrogate germander.
sent3 -> int6: the savior is not tarsal but it is flaky if it is non-ecclesiastical.; sent16 -> int7: if the fact that the savior is not a Astor and does process edict is not correct it is not ecclesiastical.; sent22 & sent21 -> int8: that the cote does not guarantee vineyard but it is other is not right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it does not guarantee vineyard and it is other is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the killer does not arrogate germander. ; $context$ = sent1: if the catkin is other then the cote is other. sent2: if something is a Astor then it does arrogate germander. sent3: a non-ecclesiastical thing is not a tarsal but flaky. sent4: the pollard is a kind of a Heinz that guarantees Harlem if it does not dissent joss. sent5: if that that the savior is ecclesiastical but it is not flaky is wrong hold the fact that the killer does process edict is not incorrect. sent6: if the Doberman does not process edict then that the killer does arrogate germander and it is ecclesiastical does not hold. sent7: if the catkin is upmarket then the cote is other. sent8: if the savior arrogates germander it is flaky. sent9: if something is other it either processes edict or does not guarantee vineyard or both. sent10: the pollard does not dissent joss. sent11: the panhandler is flaky. sent12: if the catkin is not a Heinz then the fact that either it is other or it is upmarket or both is not incorrect. sent13: if the fact that the savior is not ecclesiastical is not wrong then the killer does process edict. sent14: the joss is both non-tarsal and non-flaky if the savior is not ecclesiastical. sent15: the killer does not arrogate germander if the savior is non-tarsal and not non-flaky. sent16: if that something is not a Astor but it does process edict is not right then it is not ecclesiastical. sent17: the panhandler is a kind of a tarsal. sent18: if there is something such that it is a tarsal then that the savior is ecclesiastical and is not flaky is not correct. sent19: if the killer does process edict it is a Astor. sent20: the fact that the savior processes extinction hold. sent21: the cote is not upmarket. sent22: if the fact that the cote is not upmarket is not false then that it does not guarantee vineyard and it is other does not hold. sent23: if the pollard is a Heinz then the catkin is not a Heinz. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: there exists something such that it is a tarsal.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the savior is ecclesiastical but it is not flaky is not true.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the killer processes edict hold.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the killer is a kind of a Astor.; sent2 -> int5: if that the killer is a Astor is not incorrect then it arrogates germander.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__