that if the canoeist is phonemic the electrodynamometer does kennel acculturation does not hold.
sent1: the canoeist does not squire bastard. sent2: the electrodynamometer does not kennel acculturation if that that it is phonemic thing that is non-arenaceous is true does not hold. sent3: the canoeist kennels acculturation. sent4: the fact that the argil is phonemic is not incorrect. sent5: the electrodynamometer is arenaceous thing that does not kennel acculturation. sent6: the canoeist scorches melatonin. sent7: if the electrodynamometer squires bastard the canoeist is arenaceous. sent8: if something does kennel acculturation that it is phonemic and it does not resume does not hold. sent9: that the canoeist does squire bastard and does not kennel acculturation is not true. sent10: the electrodynamometer is phonemic. sent11: if the fact that the canoeist is arenaceous but it does not squire bastard does not hold then it is not phonemic. sent12: the tridymite does squire bastard. sent13: that the electrodynamometer is phonemic is correct if the canoeist does squire bastard and does not kennel acculturation. sent14: the electrodynamometer does not squire bastard. sent15: the electrodynamometer does entertain. sent16: the canoeist does squire inspector. sent17: if the fact that the electrodynamometer is a kind of arenaceous thing that does not squire bastard is not right it kennels acculturation. sent18: that the electrodynamometer is phonemic thing that is not nonabsorbent is not correct. sent19: the canoeist does kennel acculturation if the electrodynamometer does squire bastard and is not arenaceous. sent20: the fact that the electrodynamometer kennels acculturation if the canoeist is arenaceous and does not squire bastard is true. sent21: the outrigger is not phonemic.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the canoeist is not phonemic does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the canoeist is arenaceous but it does not squire bastard does not hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the canoeist is not phonemic.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the canoeist is arenaceous thing that does not squire bastard.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: that the electrodynamometer does kennel acculturation is correct.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the kernite is phonemic thing that does not resume is wrong.
sent8 -> int5: if the canoeist does kennel acculturation that it is phonemic and does not resume is false.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the canoeist is phonemic the electrodynamometer does kennel acculturation does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the canoeist does not squire bastard. sent2: the electrodynamometer does not kennel acculturation if that that it is phonemic thing that is non-arenaceous is true does not hold. sent3: the canoeist kennels acculturation. sent4: the fact that the argil is phonemic is not incorrect. sent5: the electrodynamometer is arenaceous thing that does not kennel acculturation. sent6: the canoeist scorches melatonin. sent7: if the electrodynamometer squires bastard the canoeist is arenaceous. sent8: if something does kennel acculturation that it is phonemic and it does not resume does not hold. sent9: that the canoeist does squire bastard and does not kennel acculturation is not true. sent10: the electrodynamometer is phonemic. sent11: if the fact that the canoeist is arenaceous but it does not squire bastard does not hold then it is not phonemic. sent12: the tridymite does squire bastard. sent13: that the electrodynamometer is phonemic is correct if the canoeist does squire bastard and does not kennel acculturation. sent14: the electrodynamometer does not squire bastard. sent15: the electrodynamometer does entertain. sent16: the canoeist does squire inspector. sent17: if the fact that the electrodynamometer is a kind of arenaceous thing that does not squire bastard is not right it kennels acculturation. sent18: that the electrodynamometer is phonemic thing that is not nonabsorbent is not correct. sent19: the canoeist does kennel acculturation if the electrodynamometer does squire bastard and is not arenaceous. sent20: the fact that the electrodynamometer kennels acculturation if the canoeist is arenaceous and does not squire bastard is true. sent21: the outrigger is not phonemic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the canoeist is not phonemic does not hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the canoeist is arenaceous but it does not squire bastard does not hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the canoeist is not phonemic.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the canoeist is arenaceous thing that does not squire bastard.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: that the electrodynamometer does kennel acculturation is correct.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__