the replicating dysphasia leads to that the metabolizing firth does not occur.
sent1: the replicating dysphasia occurs if both the nidicolousness and the metabolizing firth occurs. sent2: the nidicolousness and the calcificness occurs. sent3: the inexpressibleness occurs. sent4: if the fact that the calcificness does not occur hold then the nidicolousness occurs and the studying VLDL occurs. sent5: if the fact that the heterodactylness does not occur hold either the replicating dysphasia occurs or the metabolizing firth happens or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the replicating dysphasia happens.; sent2 -> int1: the nidicolousness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the metabolizing firth occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the nidicolousness and the metabolizing firth occurs.;
the studying VLDL happens and the baseball happens.
$hypothesis$ = the replicating dysphasia leads to that the metabolizing firth does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the replicating dysphasia occurs if both the nidicolousness and the metabolizing firth occurs. sent2: the nidicolousness and the calcificness occurs. sent3: the inexpressibleness occurs. sent4: if the fact that the calcificness does not occur hold then the nidicolousness occurs and the studying VLDL occurs. sent5: if the fact that the heterodactylness does not occur hold either the replicating dysphasia occurs or the metabolizing firth happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the replicating dysphasia happens.; sent2 -> int1: the nidicolousness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the metabolizing firth occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the nidicolousness and the metabolizing firth occurs.; __UNKNOWN__