that something scorches speechlessness and is intermolecular is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not noncaloric and does not scorch speechlessness does not hold. sent2: the slaver is not unsteady. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Martian and not nonfissionable does not hold. sent4: the crochet either is identical or is a kind of a Bokmal or both. sent5: the Berg is intermolecular if the crochet is identical. sent6: the crochet is identical if there is something such that the fact that it is not intermolecular and it is identical is not correct. sent7: the Berg is a Bokmal. sent8: that the Berg scorches speechlessness is not wrong if there is something such that the fact that it is not noncaloric and does not scorches speechlessness is false. sent9: if the Berg is not a Bokmal the idealist is identical and/or is not non-hydrophilic. sent10: the Berg is intermolecular if the crochet is a Bokmal. sent11: that the knothole is heliacal and it is Muslim is true. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-noncaloric thing that scorches speechlessness is false.
sent4 & sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the Berg is intermolecular.; sent1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the Berg scorches speechlessness is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Berg scorches speechlessness and is intermolecular.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the crochet is hydrophilic.
$hypothesis$ = that something scorches speechlessness and is intermolecular is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is not noncaloric and does not scorch speechlessness does not hold. sent2: the slaver is not unsteady. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Martian and not nonfissionable does not hold. sent4: the crochet either is identical or is a kind of a Bokmal or both. sent5: the Berg is intermolecular if the crochet is identical. sent6: the crochet is identical if there is something such that the fact that it is not intermolecular and it is identical is not correct. sent7: the Berg is a Bokmal. sent8: that the Berg scorches speechlessness is not wrong if there is something such that the fact that it is not noncaloric and does not scorches speechlessness is false. sent9: if the Berg is not a Bokmal the idealist is identical and/or is not non-hydrophilic. sent10: the Berg is intermolecular if the crochet is a Bokmal. sent11: that the knothole is heliacal and it is Muslim is true. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-noncaloric thing that scorches speechlessness is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the Berg is intermolecular.; sent1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the Berg scorches speechlessness is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Berg scorches speechlessness and is intermolecular.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__