there is something such that if that it is a Hadean is correct that it is a kind of a Menuhin and it is not a roentgen is false.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Hadean it is a Menuhin and it is not a roentgen. sent2: there is something such that if it is a Hadean that it is a Menuhin and is a roentgen does not hold. sent3: that something is nonmonotonic but it is not a nonstop is wrong if it is a kind of an inevitable. sent4: if the recto is a Hadean then that it is a Menuhin and it is not a kind of a roentgen is not right. sent5: the fact that if the recto is a kind of the Hadean the fact that the recto is both a Menuhin and a roentgen does not hold is not wrong. sent6: there is something such that if it does tweedle Plutarch then the fact that it splutters breadstick and is not geophytic is false.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is an inevitable then that it is nonmonotonic and not a nonstop is incorrect.
sent3 -> int1: if the apposition is an inevitable that it is a kind of nonmonotonic thing that is not a nonstop is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a Hadean is correct that it is a kind of a Menuhin and it is not a roentgen is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Hadean it is a Menuhin and it is not a roentgen. sent2: there is something such that if it is a Hadean that it is a Menuhin and is a roentgen does not hold. sent3: that something is nonmonotonic but it is not a nonstop is wrong if it is a kind of an inevitable. sent4: if the recto is a Hadean then that it is a Menuhin and it is not a kind of a roentgen is not right. sent5: the fact that if the recto is a kind of the Hadean the fact that the recto is both a Menuhin and a roentgen does not hold is not wrong. sent6: there is something such that if it does tweedle Plutarch then the fact that it splutters breadstick and is not geophytic is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__