that the snipe happens hold.
sent1: if the beggaring parsnip does not occur then the match-up does not occur and the parotidness does not occur. sent2: the fact that either the exploiting occurs or the occupancy does not occur or both is incorrect. sent3: the avascularness occurs if the pink but not the piecing ruminant happens. sent4: if the put does not occur then the sniping occurs. sent5: the thermionicsness happens or the hazing happens or both. sent6: if the rum does not occur both the non-germfreeness and the non-thermodynamicsness happens. sent7: if the fact that the occupancy but not the exploiting happens is not true the sniping does not occur. sent8: if the repressing bumper occurs then the bractealness does not occur. sent9: the piecing fiance occurs. sent10: that the antithyroidness and/or the non-Ismailiness occurs is incorrect. sent11: if either the beggaring tokamak happens or the tutelage occurs or both the repudiation does not occur. sent12: the collusion occurs. sent13: the zoolatry prevents that the put occurs. sent14: that the pinking does not occur and the piecing ruminant does not occur prevents the non-avascularness. sent15: that the pink does not occur and the piecing ruminant does not occur is brought about by that the exploiting does not occur. sent16: that both the exploiting and the hogging needlework happens is not false if the occupancy does not occur. sent17: either the expense or the cleistogamousness or both happens. sent18: that the vespers does not occur is caused by that the beggaring simulation does not occur. sent19: the rupture happens and/or the coursing occurs. sent20: the substitute does not occur. sent21: the thermodynamicsness does not occur. sent22: if that the avascularness does not occur hold the pink occurs or the piecing ruminant does not occur or both. sent23: the veneering occurs. sent24: if the avascularness occurs or the zoolatry happens or both then the put does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exploiting happens.; assump1 -> int1: the exploiting happens or the occupancy does not occur or both.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the exploiting does not occur.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the pinking does not occur and the piecing ruminant does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: that the avascularness occurs is true.; int5 -> int6: either the avascularness happens or the zoolatry occurs or both.; sent24 & int6 -> int7: the put does not occur.; sent4 & int7 -> hypothesis;
either the beggaring emissary occurs or the hogging needlework occurs or both.
$hypothesis$ = that the snipe happens hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the beggaring parsnip does not occur then the match-up does not occur and the parotidness does not occur. sent2: the fact that either the exploiting occurs or the occupancy does not occur or both is incorrect. sent3: the avascularness occurs if the pink but not the piecing ruminant happens. sent4: if the put does not occur then the sniping occurs. sent5: the thermionicsness happens or the hazing happens or both. sent6: if the rum does not occur both the non-germfreeness and the non-thermodynamicsness happens. sent7: if the fact that the occupancy but not the exploiting happens is not true the sniping does not occur. sent8: if the repressing bumper occurs then the bractealness does not occur. sent9: the piecing fiance occurs. sent10: that the antithyroidness and/or the non-Ismailiness occurs is incorrect. sent11: if either the beggaring tokamak happens or the tutelage occurs or both the repudiation does not occur. sent12: the collusion occurs. sent13: the zoolatry prevents that the put occurs. sent14: that the pinking does not occur and the piecing ruminant does not occur prevents the non-avascularness. sent15: that the pink does not occur and the piecing ruminant does not occur is brought about by that the exploiting does not occur. sent16: that both the exploiting and the hogging needlework happens is not false if the occupancy does not occur. sent17: either the expense or the cleistogamousness or both happens. sent18: that the vespers does not occur is caused by that the beggaring simulation does not occur. sent19: the rupture happens and/or the coursing occurs. sent20: the substitute does not occur. sent21: the thermodynamicsness does not occur. sent22: if that the avascularness does not occur hold the pink occurs or the piecing ruminant does not occur or both. sent23: the veneering occurs. sent24: if the avascularness occurs or the zoolatry happens or both then the put does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exploiting happens.; assump1 -> int1: the exploiting happens or the occupancy does not occur or both.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the exploiting does not occur.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the pinking does not occur and the piecing ruminant does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: that the avascularness occurs is true.; int5 -> int6: either the avascularness happens or the zoolatry occurs or both.; sent24 & int6 -> int7: the put does not occur.; sent4 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__