the whisk touts subordinating and is transitional.
sent1: something is not transitional if that it is a kind of a Platonism that is not postmeridian is false. sent2: the planner is unalterable if the cubitiere is a taps. sent3: the whisk touts subordinating and it is transitional if the jackdaw is not transitional. sent4: the marsupial is inductive. sent5: if the lace does embark but it does not indurate update then that the jackdaw does not embark is not wrong. sent6: if something is a kind of a doorkeeper that does coo then it does not tout withholder. sent7: the whisk is transitional. sent8: if the planner is unalterable then the bracelet is not inshore but it is vestibular. sent9: if the pyroelectricity is part-time then the lace embarks and does not indurate update. sent10: if the deoxythymidine does not tout withholder then the pyroelectricity is apothegmatic and it is part-time. sent11: the fact that the jackdaw is a Platonism that is not postmeridian is not true if that it does embark is not wrong. sent12: if there exists something such that it is inductive then the cubitiere does tap and/or it is inductive. sent13: if the jackdaw does not embark then that the whisk touts subordinating and is transitional does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: if that the jackdaw is a kind of a Platonism that is not postmeridian is not true then it is not transitional.;
that the whisk touts subordinating and it is transitional does not hold.
sent6 -> int2: if the fact that the deoxythymidine is a doorkeeper and it is a coo is correct then it does not tout withholder.; sent4 -> int3: there exists something such that it is inductive.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the cubitiere is a taps and/or it is inductive.;
$hypothesis$ = the whisk touts subordinating and is transitional. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not transitional if that it is a kind of a Platonism that is not postmeridian is false. sent2: the planner is unalterable if the cubitiere is a taps. sent3: the whisk touts subordinating and it is transitional if the jackdaw is not transitional. sent4: the marsupial is inductive. sent5: if the lace does embark but it does not indurate update then that the jackdaw does not embark is not wrong. sent6: if something is a kind of a doorkeeper that does coo then it does not tout withholder. sent7: the whisk is transitional. sent8: if the planner is unalterable then the bracelet is not inshore but it is vestibular. sent9: if the pyroelectricity is part-time then the lace embarks and does not indurate update. sent10: if the deoxythymidine does not tout withholder then the pyroelectricity is apothegmatic and it is part-time. sent11: the fact that the jackdaw is a Platonism that is not postmeridian is not true if that it does embark is not wrong. sent12: if there exists something such that it is inductive then the cubitiere does tap and/or it is inductive. sent13: if the jackdaw does not embark then that the whisk touts subordinating and is transitional does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if that the jackdaw is a kind of a Platonism that is not postmeridian is not true then it is not transitional.; __UNKNOWN__