the pepsinogen is not a Sunnite.
sent1: the philatelist is not allelic if the fact that the sauce-alone is allelic and a semifluidity is wrong. sent2: that the cardoon does not flock cleanness and does not dado stinkpot is false. sent3: if the philatelist is not allelic then that it does not flock sauce-alone and it is vestiary is not true. sent4: the pepsinogen is not a e-commerce. sent5: if that the cardoon does not flock cleanness and it does not dado stinkpot is wrong then it does not carjack philatelist. sent6: that something is a guidance but it is not a Sunnite is false if it is not a transitive. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does not flock sauce-alone and it is vestiary does not hold then the purification does flock sauce-alone. sent8: if something that does flock sauce-alone is a kind of a Cheyenne the pepsinogen is not a kind of a transitive. sent9: there exists nothing that is allelic and is a semifluidity. sent10: if there exists something such that it does not carjack philatelist that the Latinist is Antiguan and does not carjack receptacle is not correct. sent11: the bialy is not a kind of a Dimocarpus if that the Latinist is Antiguan but it does not carjack receptacle is not true. sent12: if the pepsinogen is not a kind of a e-commerce that it is not a kind of a purse and it segregates Paprilus is not correct. sent13: the purification is a kind of a Cheyenne if something is not a kind of a Dimocarpus. sent14: something is jurisprudential if it does not segregate rounding. sent15: the subdivision is a kind of a e-commerce if there exists something such that the fact that it is a guidance and not a Sunnite does not hold. sent16: that something is a Sunnite if the fact that it does not purse and it segregates Paprilus is incorrect is not incorrect.
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the pepsinogen is not a kind of a purse and segregates Paprilus does not hold.; sent16 -> int2: if that the pepsinogen is not a kind of a purse and does segregate Paprilus is not correct then it is a Sunnite.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the subdivision is a e-commerce.
sent6 -> int3: if the pepsinogen is not a transitive then that it is a guidance and is not a Sunnite is wrong.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the sauce-alone is allelic and it is a kind of a semifluidity is not right.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the philatelist is not allelic.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the philatelist does not flock sauce-alone and is vestiary is false.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it does not flock sauce-alone and is vestiary does not hold.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the purification flocks sauce-alone.; sent5 & sent2 -> int9: the cardoon does not carjack philatelist.; int9 -> int10: something does not carjack philatelist.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the fact that the Latinist is a Antiguan but it does not carjack receptacle does not hold.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: the bialy is not a Dimocarpus.; int12 -> int13: something is not a kind of a Dimocarpus.; int13 & sent13 -> int14: the purification is a kind of a Cheyenne.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the purification does flock sauce-alone and it is a kind of a Cheyenne.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it does flock sauce-alone and is a Cheyenne.; int16 & sent8 -> int17: the pepsinogen is not transitive.; int3 & int17 -> int18: that the pepsinogen is a guidance and is not a kind of a Sunnite is wrong.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that that it is a guidance that is not a Sunnite is false.; int19 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pepsinogen is not a Sunnite. ; $context$ = sent1: the philatelist is not allelic if the fact that the sauce-alone is allelic and a semifluidity is wrong. sent2: that the cardoon does not flock cleanness and does not dado stinkpot is false. sent3: if the philatelist is not allelic then that it does not flock sauce-alone and it is vestiary is not true. sent4: the pepsinogen is not a e-commerce. sent5: if that the cardoon does not flock cleanness and it does not dado stinkpot is wrong then it does not carjack philatelist. sent6: that something is a guidance but it is not a Sunnite is false if it is not a transitive. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does not flock sauce-alone and it is vestiary does not hold then the purification does flock sauce-alone. sent8: if something that does flock sauce-alone is a kind of a Cheyenne the pepsinogen is not a kind of a transitive. sent9: there exists nothing that is allelic and is a semifluidity. sent10: if there exists something such that it does not carjack philatelist that the Latinist is Antiguan and does not carjack receptacle is not correct. sent11: the bialy is not a kind of a Dimocarpus if that the Latinist is Antiguan but it does not carjack receptacle is not true. sent12: if the pepsinogen is not a kind of a e-commerce that it is not a kind of a purse and it segregates Paprilus is not correct. sent13: the purification is a kind of a Cheyenne if something is not a kind of a Dimocarpus. sent14: something is jurisprudential if it does not segregate rounding. sent15: the subdivision is a kind of a e-commerce if there exists something such that the fact that it is a guidance and not a Sunnite does not hold. sent16: that something is a Sunnite if the fact that it does not purse and it segregates Paprilus is incorrect is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the pepsinogen is not a kind of a purse and segregates Paprilus does not hold.; sent16 -> int2: if that the pepsinogen is not a kind of a purse and does segregate Paprilus is not correct then it is a Sunnite.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__