the maltreatment does not occur and/or the K.E. does not occur.
sent1: the monotheisticness happens and the spectroscopy does not occur. sent2: the monotheisticness is prevented by that the palatoglossalness happens and/or the onomasticsness happens. sent3: if the aboralness does not occur then the maltreatment happens and/or the K.E. does not occur. sent4: the bridalness occurs. sent5: the biogenicness does not occur. sent6: the maltreatment does not occur or the K.E. does not occur or both if the aboralness does not occur. sent7: if that the amauroticness does not occur hold that the expiring tow happens and the duster does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the amauroticness occurs then the palatoglossalness happens. sent9: if the fact that the amauroticness but not the biogenicness occurs is not correct the aboralness does not occur. sent10: either that the maltreatment does not occur or the K.E. or both is triggered by the non-aboralness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the amauroticness and the non-biogenicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the amauroticness happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the palatoglossalness happens.; int2 -> int3: the palatoglossalness and/or the onomasticsness happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the monotheisticness does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the monotheisticness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the amauroticness occurs and the biogenicness does not occur is incorrect.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the aboralness does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the expiring tow occurs and the duster does not occur is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the maltreatment does not occur and/or the K.E. does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the monotheisticness happens and the spectroscopy does not occur. sent2: the monotheisticness is prevented by that the palatoglossalness happens and/or the onomasticsness happens. sent3: if the aboralness does not occur then the maltreatment happens and/or the K.E. does not occur. sent4: the bridalness occurs. sent5: the biogenicness does not occur. sent6: the maltreatment does not occur or the K.E. does not occur or both if the aboralness does not occur. sent7: if that the amauroticness does not occur hold that the expiring tow happens and the duster does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the amauroticness occurs then the palatoglossalness happens. sent9: if the fact that the amauroticness but not the biogenicness occurs is not correct the aboralness does not occur. sent10: either that the maltreatment does not occur or the K.E. or both is triggered by the non-aboralness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the amauroticness and the non-biogenicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the amauroticness happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the palatoglossalness happens.; int2 -> int3: the palatoglossalness and/or the onomasticsness happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the monotheisticness does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the monotheisticness happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the amauroticness occurs and the biogenicness does not occur is incorrect.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the aboralness does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__