that the countryside is both Appalachians and abiogenetic is wrong.
sent1: if the mercer is non-abiogenetic the mater does gripe curbside and does dally. sent2: the countryside does seam parable. sent3: the countryside is abiogenetic if the mercer gripes curbside. sent4: the fact that that something is a Appalachians and abiogenetic is correct is not true if the fact that it does not gripe curbside is not false. sent5: if the countryside does seam parable then that it does not abound and is not Appalachians is not correct. sent6: the countryside does not seam parable if the fact that it is not a Scolopacidae and it is a sick is false. sent7: if the countryside seams parable then the fact that it does not abound and it is a kind of a Appalachians is not correct. sent8: the frivolity does seam gigahertz. sent9: the mercer is not abiogenetic if the countryside is not a Appalachians but it abounds. sent10: the mercer does dally. sent11: the fact that the mercer gripes curbside and it dallies is not incorrect. sent12: The parable does seam countryside. sent13: something is a kind of a Appalachians if that it does not abound and it is not Appalachians is not correct. sent14: that the countryside does not abound and is a kind of a Appalachians does not hold. sent15: if the frivolity does seam gigahertz that it is not conceptualistic and does not bargain pye-dog is false.
sent11 -> int1: the mercer does gripe curbside.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the countryside is abiogenetic.; sent13 -> int3: if that the countryside does not abound and is not a Appalachians is incorrect then the fact that it is a Appalachians is not false.; sent5 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the countryside does not abound and it is non-Appalachians is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the countryside is not non-Appalachians.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the mater does gripe curbside and is bimorphemic.
sent15 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the frivolity is non-conceptualistic thing that does not bargain pye-dog is false.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not conceptualistic and it does not bargain pye-dog is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the countryside is both Appalachians and abiogenetic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mercer is non-abiogenetic the mater does gripe curbside and does dally. sent2: the countryside does seam parable. sent3: the countryside is abiogenetic if the mercer gripes curbside. sent4: the fact that that something is a Appalachians and abiogenetic is correct is not true if the fact that it does not gripe curbside is not false. sent5: if the countryside does seam parable then that it does not abound and is not Appalachians is not correct. sent6: the countryside does not seam parable if the fact that it is not a Scolopacidae and it is a sick is false. sent7: if the countryside seams parable then the fact that it does not abound and it is a kind of a Appalachians is not correct. sent8: the frivolity does seam gigahertz. sent9: the mercer is not abiogenetic if the countryside is not a Appalachians but it abounds. sent10: the mercer does dally. sent11: the fact that the mercer gripes curbside and it dallies is not incorrect. sent12: The parable does seam countryside. sent13: something is a kind of a Appalachians if that it does not abound and it is not Appalachians is not correct. sent14: that the countryside does not abound and is a kind of a Appalachians does not hold. sent15: if the frivolity does seam gigahertz that it is not conceptualistic and does not bargain pye-dog is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the mercer does gripe curbside.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the countryside is abiogenetic.; sent13 -> int3: if that the countryside does not abound and is not a Appalachians is incorrect then the fact that it is a Appalachians is not false.; sent5 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the countryside does not abound and it is non-Appalachians is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the countryside is not non-Appalachians.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__