there exists something such that if it is not inaesthetic then the fact that it is a kind of a Mecca that amends does not hold.
sent1: if something is not a Mecca then that it does bob and toilet-trains leering is not correct. sent2: that the hook does toilet-train crab and it is not non-closed is wrong if it is inaesthetic. sent3: if the rudderfish is not inaesthetic that it is a kind of a Mecca and does amend is wrong. sent4: the fact that the Appenzeller is a planted and it is a whisper is not correct if it is not chitinous. sent5: that the rudderfish is a kind of a Mecca and it does amend is wrong if that it is inaesthetic hold. sent6: if the rudderfish does not syllogize endocardium that it is a kind of a Artocarpus that amends is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a Rediffusion the fact that it does syllogize Eleutherodactylus and is dimensional is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Taoist then that it is a backgrounder and a Corydalus does not hold. sent9: the fact that something articulates Circassian and it is transatlantic is incorrect if it is not nonlinguistic. sent10: if something is not a seer then the fact that it is astrological and it articulates Circassian is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the rudderfish does syllogize coolie is correct then that it is a Rediffusion and toilet-trains crab is not true. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a Spinus that it does syllogize ID and it is datable is false. sent13: there is something such that if it is not inaesthetic then it is a Mecca and does amend. sent14: the fact that the crab does amend and it is patristic does not hold if it is not a reductase. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not syllogize Heinz then the fact that it does articulate Circassian and is trophoblastic is not true. sent16: there is something such that if it is inaesthetic then that it is a Mecca and it amends is wrong. sent17: the fact that the rudderfish does toilet-train counterattack and it is printable is false if it is not a Mecca. sent18: there is something such that if it is not a Bathsheba then the fact that it is transatlantic and it is a planted is incorrect. sent19: that the rudderfish staggers and amends does not hold if it is not eruptive. sent20: that there exists something such that if it is not a rolled the fact that it is both not passerine and antheridial is not true is not false. sent21: the rudderfish is a Mecca and it does amend if it is aesthetic.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a seer the fact that it is a kind of astrological thing that articulates Circassian is wrong.
sent10 -> int1: if the thorax is not a seer then that it is a kind of astrological thing that does articulate Circassian is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not inaesthetic then the fact that it is a kind of a Mecca that amends does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a Mecca then that it does bob and toilet-trains leering is not correct. sent2: that the hook does toilet-train crab and it is not non-closed is wrong if it is inaesthetic. sent3: if the rudderfish is not inaesthetic that it is a kind of a Mecca and does amend is wrong. sent4: the fact that the Appenzeller is a planted and it is a whisper is not correct if it is not chitinous. sent5: that the rudderfish is a kind of a Mecca and it does amend is wrong if that it is inaesthetic hold. sent6: if the rudderfish does not syllogize endocardium that it is a kind of a Artocarpus that amends is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a Rediffusion the fact that it does syllogize Eleutherodactylus and is dimensional is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Taoist then that it is a backgrounder and a Corydalus does not hold. sent9: the fact that something articulates Circassian and it is transatlantic is incorrect if it is not nonlinguistic. sent10: if something is not a seer then the fact that it is astrological and it articulates Circassian is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the rudderfish does syllogize coolie is correct then that it is a Rediffusion and toilet-trains crab is not true. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a Spinus that it does syllogize ID and it is datable is false. sent13: there is something such that if it is not inaesthetic then it is a Mecca and does amend. sent14: the fact that the crab does amend and it is patristic does not hold if it is not a reductase. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not syllogize Heinz then the fact that it does articulate Circassian and is trophoblastic is not true. sent16: there is something such that if it is inaesthetic then that it is a Mecca and it amends is wrong. sent17: the fact that the rudderfish does toilet-train counterattack and it is printable is false if it is not a Mecca. sent18: there is something such that if it is not a Bathsheba then the fact that it is transatlantic and it is a planted is incorrect. sent19: that the rudderfish staggers and amends does not hold if it is not eruptive. sent20: that there exists something such that if it is not a rolled the fact that it is both not passerine and antheridial is not true is not false. sent21: the rudderfish is a Mecca and it does amend if it is aesthetic. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__