the tactfulness but not the laparoscopy happens.
sent1: that the airing but not the defaulting bigot occurs is brought about by the marveling Etropus. sent2: that that both the vulnerableness and the specialisticness happens is not incorrect does not hold if the ataxicness does not occur. sent3: the tactfulness occurs. sent4: the tactfulness happens if the comprehensive happens. sent5: the fact that the blare does not occur and the impressionist does not occur does not hold if the pullback occurs. sent6: the archaeologicalness is prevented by that the elementalness does not occur. sent7: the laparoscopy happens and/or the blare happens if the fact that the specialisticness does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the aeronauticalness does not occur and the pullback does not occur if the inaccurateness happens. sent9: if the archaeologicalness does not occur the inaccurateness and the armament occurs. sent10: the coconspiring and the discordantness occurs. sent11: the unresponsiveness occurs. sent12: if the fact that not the tramping but the ataxicness happens does not hold the ataxicness does not occur. sent13: the comprehensiveness occurs and the impressionist occurs. sent14: if the comprehensive does not occur then the twiddle but not the masterpiece happens. sent15: if the fact that that the vulnerableness and the specialisticness occurs is not right is right the specialisticness does not occur. sent16: the impressionist occurs. sent17: if the aeronauticalness does not occur and the pullback does not occur the fact that the impressionistness happens is correct. sent18: the blare leads to that the tactfulness happens. sent19: the fact that the tactfulness but not the laparoscopy occurs is not right if the comprehensiveness does not occur. sent20: that the tramp does not occur and the ataxicness occurs does not hold. sent21: if the laparoscopy occurs the tactfulness happens.
sent13 -> int1: the comprehensiveness occurs.;
the fact that the tactfulness occurs and the laparoscopy does not occur is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the tactfulness but not the laparoscopy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the airing but not the defaulting bigot occurs is brought about by the marveling Etropus. sent2: that that both the vulnerableness and the specialisticness happens is not incorrect does not hold if the ataxicness does not occur. sent3: the tactfulness occurs. sent4: the tactfulness happens if the comprehensive happens. sent5: the fact that the blare does not occur and the impressionist does not occur does not hold if the pullback occurs. sent6: the archaeologicalness is prevented by that the elementalness does not occur. sent7: the laparoscopy happens and/or the blare happens if the fact that the specialisticness does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the aeronauticalness does not occur and the pullback does not occur if the inaccurateness happens. sent9: if the archaeologicalness does not occur the inaccurateness and the armament occurs. sent10: the coconspiring and the discordantness occurs. sent11: the unresponsiveness occurs. sent12: if the fact that not the tramping but the ataxicness happens does not hold the ataxicness does not occur. sent13: the comprehensiveness occurs and the impressionist occurs. sent14: if the comprehensive does not occur then the twiddle but not the masterpiece happens. sent15: if the fact that that the vulnerableness and the specialisticness occurs is not right is right the specialisticness does not occur. sent16: the impressionist occurs. sent17: if the aeronauticalness does not occur and the pullback does not occur the fact that the impressionistness happens is correct. sent18: the blare leads to that the tactfulness happens. sent19: the fact that the tactfulness but not the laparoscopy occurs is not right if the comprehensiveness does not occur. sent20: that the tramp does not occur and the ataxicness occurs does not hold. sent21: if the laparoscopy occurs the tactfulness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the comprehensiveness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__