the barbell does expense jingle and it reopens quartzite.
sent1: the fact that that the barbell does not reopen quartzite and does not expense chatroom is not false is not right. sent2: if the brunet is a yolk it is not a Donatist and/or does expense chatroom. sent3: something is not salable and/or it is monovalent if it is viscometric. sent4: something reopens quartzite if the fact that it does not reopens quartzite and does not expense chatroom is not correct. sent5: the fact that the barbell is not a kind of a Streep and/or it does shampoo Zomba is incorrect. sent6: if something is a Streep then it does not shampoo hemerobiid and/or it concerns selling. sent7: if something either is not stale or is salable or both the fact that it expenses jingle is correct. sent8: if the barbell reopens choirboy then it does stale. sent9: if the villain expenses jingle it is a kind of stale thing that is not compassionate. sent10: the fact that the chatroom is both not a sockeye and not superior is not correct. sent11: that the barbell is a cards is true. sent12: either the barbell is salable or it is chemiluminescent or both. sent13: the villain expenses jingle if the fact that the unguiculate does expenses jingle is true. sent14: the barbell is not a Kalamazoo. sent15: the barbell is monovalent. sent16: if something is not stale then it expenses jingle. sent17: if something does not reopen cosmetology then it either is sturdy or is a dissolubility or both. sent18: the survivalist is compassionate. sent19: if something does not expense curie then either it is not a flagellate or it is a obtainment or both. sent20: something is not changeable and/or is viscometric if it is compassionate. sent21: if something is not compassionate then either it does not stale or it is salable or both.
sent20 -> int1: if the barbell is compassionate then it is unchangeable or not non-viscometric or both.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barbell is compassionate.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the barbell is unchangeable and/or viscometric.; sent21 -> int3: if the barbell is not compassionate then it is not stale and/or is salable.; sent7 -> int4: if the barbell is non-stale or it is salable or both the fact that it does expense jingle is true.; sent4 -> int5: if that the barbell does not reopen quartzite and it does not expense chatroom is not right it reopen quartzite.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the barbell reopens quartzite.;
the palmitin is salable.
$hypothesis$ = the barbell does expense jingle and it reopens quartzite. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the barbell does not reopen quartzite and does not expense chatroom is not false is not right. sent2: if the brunet is a yolk it is not a Donatist and/or does expense chatroom. sent3: something is not salable and/or it is monovalent if it is viscometric. sent4: something reopens quartzite if the fact that it does not reopens quartzite and does not expense chatroom is not correct. sent5: the fact that the barbell is not a kind of a Streep and/or it does shampoo Zomba is incorrect. sent6: if something is a Streep then it does not shampoo hemerobiid and/or it concerns selling. sent7: if something either is not stale or is salable or both the fact that it expenses jingle is correct. sent8: if the barbell reopens choirboy then it does stale. sent9: if the villain expenses jingle it is a kind of stale thing that is not compassionate. sent10: the fact that the chatroom is both not a sockeye and not superior is not correct. sent11: that the barbell is a cards is true. sent12: either the barbell is salable or it is chemiluminescent or both. sent13: the villain expenses jingle if the fact that the unguiculate does expenses jingle is true. sent14: the barbell is not a Kalamazoo. sent15: the barbell is monovalent. sent16: if something is not stale then it expenses jingle. sent17: if something does not reopen cosmetology then it either is sturdy or is a dissolubility or both. sent18: the survivalist is compassionate. sent19: if something does not expense curie then either it is not a flagellate or it is a obtainment or both. sent20: something is not changeable and/or is viscometric if it is compassionate. sent21: if something is not compassionate then either it does not stale or it is salable or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: if the barbell is compassionate then it is unchangeable or not non-viscometric or both.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barbell is compassionate.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the barbell is unchangeable and/or viscometric.; sent21 -> int3: if the barbell is not compassionate then it is not stale and/or is salable.; sent7 -> int4: if the barbell is non-stale or it is salable or both the fact that it does expense jingle is true.; sent4 -> int5: if that the barbell does not reopen quartzite and it does not expense chatroom is not right it reopen quartzite.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the barbell reopens quartzite.; __UNKNOWN__