the Janissary is not a tantalum.
sent1: if the adit is not ecological then the Janissary is nihilistic and a tantalum. sent2: the stabile does not soften. sent3: if the fingerling is not nihilistic that the sulcus is propagative but it is non-thin does not hold. sent4: if the fingerling is not nihilistic the fact that the sulcus is both not propagative and not thin is not correct. sent5: the fact that the fingerling is not a Odocoileus and it is not sensitive is wrong. sent6: the adit is not a conscientiousness. sent7: there exists something such that it is not non-ecological. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Odocoileus and it is not sensitive does not hold it is ecological. sent9: the papaya is enforceable and is propagative if the stabile does not soften. sent10: if something that is nihilistic is ecological then the adit is a conscientiousness. sent11: the fingerling is ecological if it is a kind of a Odocoileus. sent12: if the fingerling is not nihilistic then the fact that the sulcus is not propagative and is thin is not right. sent13: the fact that the fingerling is both a Odocoileus and not sensitive is not right. sent14: something is ecological if it is a kind of a Odocoileus.
sent8 -> int1: the fingerling is ecological if that it is not a Odocoileus and it is not sensitive is false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fingerling is ecological.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fingerling is nihilistic.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the fingerling is a kind of nihilistic thing that is ecological.; int3 -> int4: the fact that there is something such that it is nihilistic and it is ecological is not false.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: that the adit is a kind of a conscientiousness hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fingerling is not nihilistic.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the fact that the sulcus is both non-propagative and non-thin is incorrect.;
the Janissary is a tantalum.
sent9 & sent2 -> int9: the papaya is both enforceable and not non-propagative.; int9 -> int10: the fact that the papaya is propagative hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is not non-propagative.;
$hypothesis$ = the Janissary is not a tantalum. ; $context$ = sent1: if the adit is not ecological then the Janissary is nihilistic and a tantalum. sent2: the stabile does not soften. sent3: if the fingerling is not nihilistic that the sulcus is propagative but it is non-thin does not hold. sent4: if the fingerling is not nihilistic the fact that the sulcus is both not propagative and not thin is not correct. sent5: the fact that the fingerling is not a Odocoileus and it is not sensitive is wrong. sent6: the adit is not a conscientiousness. sent7: there exists something such that it is not non-ecological. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Odocoileus and it is not sensitive does not hold it is ecological. sent9: the papaya is enforceable and is propagative if the stabile does not soften. sent10: if something that is nihilistic is ecological then the adit is a conscientiousness. sent11: the fingerling is ecological if it is a kind of a Odocoileus. sent12: if the fingerling is not nihilistic then the fact that the sulcus is not propagative and is thin is not right. sent13: the fact that the fingerling is both a Odocoileus and not sensitive is not right. sent14: something is ecological if it is a kind of a Odocoileus. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the fingerling is ecological if that it is not a Odocoileus and it is not sensitive is false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fingerling is ecological.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fingerling is nihilistic.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the fingerling is a kind of nihilistic thing that is ecological.; int3 -> int4: the fact that there is something such that it is nihilistic and it is ecological is not false.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: that the adit is a kind of a conscientiousness hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fingerling is not nihilistic.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the fact that the sulcus is both non-propagative and non-thin is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__