that not the designing Blair but the turnaround happens if the whiffing bacca happens is false.
sent1: the indistinguishableness occurs if that the indistinguishableness does not occur and the designing Blair does not occur is false. sent2: the designing Blair does not occur if the heathlikeness occurs and the whiffing bacca occurs. sent3: that the whiffing bacca does not occur but the designing Blair happens is wrong if that the turnaround does not occur is correct. sent4: the spasticness happens. sent5: if the microscopicness happens and/or the turnaround does not occur the turnaround does not occur. sent6: the apparition happens. sent7: not the whiffing bandwidth but the bullshit happens if the factory-madeness occurs. sent8: the turnaround does not occur but the microscopicness happens if the nonparticulateness does not occur. sent9: the Delphicness occurs. sent10: the Delphicness happens and the heathlikeness happens. sent11: the revocableness does not occur. sent12: the turnaround happens. sent13: both the extensileness and the vulgarization happens if the Delphicness does not occur. sent14: the knowableness happens and the Delphicness happens if the heathlikeness does not occur.
sent10 -> int1: the heathlikeness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whiffing bacca occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the heathlikeness occurs and the whiffing bacca occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the designing Blair does not occur is correct.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the designing Blair does not occur but the turnaround occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
both the non-nonextensileness and the vulgarization occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that not the designing Blair but the turnaround happens if the whiffing bacca happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the indistinguishableness occurs if that the indistinguishableness does not occur and the designing Blair does not occur is false. sent2: the designing Blair does not occur if the heathlikeness occurs and the whiffing bacca occurs. sent3: that the whiffing bacca does not occur but the designing Blair happens is wrong if that the turnaround does not occur is correct. sent4: the spasticness happens. sent5: if the microscopicness happens and/or the turnaround does not occur the turnaround does not occur. sent6: the apparition happens. sent7: not the whiffing bandwidth but the bullshit happens if the factory-madeness occurs. sent8: the turnaround does not occur but the microscopicness happens if the nonparticulateness does not occur. sent9: the Delphicness occurs. sent10: the Delphicness happens and the heathlikeness happens. sent11: the revocableness does not occur. sent12: the turnaround happens. sent13: both the extensileness and the vulgarization happens if the Delphicness does not occur. sent14: the knowableness happens and the Delphicness happens if the heathlikeness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the heathlikeness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whiffing bacca occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the heathlikeness occurs and the whiffing bacca occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the designing Blair does not occur is correct.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the designing Blair does not occur but the turnaround occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__