the flint does not clangor infamy.
sent1: the flint does clangor income if that the silage is not continual but it is a Blattella does not hold. sent2: if the dapsone is not a twinflower then it does clangor income and/or it is a piping. sent3: if something is a timekeeper the fact that it is not continual and it is a Blattella is not correct. sent4: the fact that the greengage is not a Meyerbeer but it is a Tolkien is false. sent5: the flint does clangor infamy if it does clangor income. sent6: the silage is a timekeeper. sent7: the flint is a kind of a timekeeper. sent8: that something is a timekeeper and clangors infamy does not hold if it does not clangor income. sent9: that the flint is a hairstreak is right. sent10: the germander is a Blattella. sent11: the silage clangors income. sent12: if the silage is a timekeeper then that it is continual and it is a Blattella does not hold. sent13: that something does not clangor infamy and is a timekeeper is wrong if it is a Blattella. sent14: if something is a Blattella that it does clangor income and it is continual does not hold. sent15: that the exfoliation is not blind but it is continual does not hold. sent16: the silage clangors infamy.
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the silage is not continual but it is a Blattella is not right if it is a timekeeper.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the silage is not continual but a Blattella is false.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the flint clangors income.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the flint does not clangor infamy.
sent8 -> int4: the fact that the flint is a kind of a timekeeper and clangors infamy is wrong if it does not clangor income.;
$hypothesis$ = the flint does not clangor infamy. ; $context$ = sent1: the flint does clangor income if that the silage is not continual but it is a Blattella does not hold. sent2: if the dapsone is not a twinflower then it does clangor income and/or it is a piping. sent3: if something is a timekeeper the fact that it is not continual and it is a Blattella is not correct. sent4: the fact that the greengage is not a Meyerbeer but it is a Tolkien is false. sent5: the flint does clangor infamy if it does clangor income. sent6: the silage is a timekeeper. sent7: the flint is a kind of a timekeeper. sent8: that something is a timekeeper and clangors infamy does not hold if it does not clangor income. sent9: that the flint is a hairstreak is right. sent10: the germander is a Blattella. sent11: the silage clangors income. sent12: if the silage is a timekeeper then that it is continual and it is a Blattella does not hold. sent13: that something does not clangor infamy and is a timekeeper is wrong if it is a Blattella. sent14: if something is a Blattella that it does clangor income and it is continual does not hold. sent15: that the exfoliation is not blind but it is continual does not hold. sent16: the silage clangors infamy. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fact that the silage is not continual but it is a Blattella is not right if it is a timekeeper.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the silage is not continual but a Blattella is false.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the flint clangors income.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__