the AU does not requite declassification but it is a lob.
sent1: there is something such that it is unscalable. sent2: the AU does lob if the naturopath requites declassification. sent3: the AU is a lob. sent4: if the thumbscrew is cauline thing that staves stokehold it is not front. sent5: if the fact that the pyrethrum does not impinge hussar but it fronts is not right then the fact that the naturopath is a sapodilla is true. sent6: the thumbscrew does not stave stokehold. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is not unscalable is not false. sent8: if something that is cauline does not stave stokehold then the fact that it is not a kind of a front hold. sent9: the fact that the fact that something does not requite declassification and is a lob is not incorrect is not correct if it impinges hussar. sent10: if the fact that the naturopath does requite declassification hold then the AU does not requite declassification and is a lob. sent11: everything is not a Ling-pao. sent12: the AU is not a sapodilla if there is something such that that it is unscalable and it is a sapodilla is not right. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not unscalable the thumbscrew is cauline thing that does not stave stokehold. sent14: the naturopath requites declassification if it is a sapodilla. sent15: the thumbscrew does not stave stokehold if something is not unscalable. sent16: the naturopath is a kind of a sapodilla if the pyrethrum is not front. sent17: if something is cauline and it staves stokehold it does not front. sent18: if something is not a Ling-pao the fact that it is unscalable and it is a kind of a sapodilla is not true.
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the thumbscrew is cauline and does not stave stokehold is not false then it is not a front.; sent7 & sent13 -> int2: the thumbscrew is a kind of cauline thing that does not stave stokehold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the thumbscrew is non-front.;
the fact that the AU does not requite declassification but it is a lob is not true.
sent9 -> int4: if that the AU does impinge hussar is true then the fact that it does not requite declassification and it does lob is wrong.; sent18 -> int5: the fact that the naturopath is unscalable thing that is a sapodilla does not hold if it is not a Ling-pao.; sent11 -> int6: the naturopath is not a kind of a Ling-pao.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the naturopath is both unscalable and a sapodilla does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there is nothing that is unscalable and is a sapodilla.; int8 -> int9: that the pyrethrum is unscalable and it is a kind of a sapodilla is not right.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is unscalable and it is a sapodilla does not hold.; sent12 & int10 -> int11: the AU is not a sapodilla.;
$hypothesis$ = the AU does not requite declassification but it is a lob. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is unscalable. sent2: the AU does lob if the naturopath requites declassification. sent3: the AU is a lob. sent4: if the thumbscrew is cauline thing that staves stokehold it is not front. sent5: if the fact that the pyrethrum does not impinge hussar but it fronts is not right then the fact that the naturopath is a sapodilla is true. sent6: the thumbscrew does not stave stokehold. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is not unscalable is not false. sent8: if something that is cauline does not stave stokehold then the fact that it is not a kind of a front hold. sent9: the fact that the fact that something does not requite declassification and is a lob is not incorrect is not correct if it impinges hussar. sent10: if the fact that the naturopath does requite declassification hold then the AU does not requite declassification and is a lob. sent11: everything is not a Ling-pao. sent12: the AU is not a sapodilla if there is something such that that it is unscalable and it is a sapodilla is not right. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not unscalable the thumbscrew is cauline thing that does not stave stokehold. sent14: the naturopath requites declassification if it is a sapodilla. sent15: the thumbscrew does not stave stokehold if something is not unscalable. sent16: the naturopath is a kind of a sapodilla if the pyrethrum is not front. sent17: if something is cauline and it staves stokehold it does not front. sent18: if something is not a Ling-pao the fact that it is unscalable and it is a kind of a sapodilla is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the thumbscrew is cauline and does not stave stokehold is not false then it is not a front.; sent7 & sent13 -> int2: the thumbscrew is a kind of cauline thing that does not stave stokehold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the thumbscrew is non-front.; __UNKNOWN__