the junction is a pyridoxine if the fact that the Gael begins drizzle is not false.
sent1: if something is not gutsy it does not begin drizzle. sent2: if the fact that something interposes and is not allergenic is not true then it is not a Methodism. sent3: if something is not gutsy then it does begin drizzle. sent4: if the Gael is phocine then the fact that it is gutsy is correct. sent5: something is not a kind of a snakeblenny if the fact that it is a kind of non-Nicaean thing that is not a Methodism is false. sent6: if the Gael does not interpose then it is not a Methodism. sent7: if the arousal is not a kind of a Truffaut or it is a confusion or both then the Gael is a unselfconsciousness. sent8: the junction is not a ethnography. sent9: the Gael is not Nicaean if the fact that it is allergenic and does not interpose is false. sent10: the fact that the drizzle does not begin drizzle and is not a pyridoxine does not hold if the junction is not a kind of a unselfconsciousness. sent11: if something is not phlegmy either it is not a Truffaut or it is a confusion or both. sent12: the Gael begins drizzle if it is not gutsy. sent13: the fact that the Gael does interpose but it is not allergenic is incorrect if the junction is not Nicaean. sent14: if something is not gutsy then that it is a kind of non-Nicaean thing that is not a kind of a Methodism is incorrect. sent15: something is not gutsy if it is not a Methodism. sent16: something is not a Methodism if it does not interpose. sent17: the junction does not begin drizzle. sent18: the junction is not a unselfconsciousness if the Gael is a unselfconsciousness.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the junction is not Nicaean.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that that the Gael interposes but it is not allergenic is incorrect is true.; sent2 -> int2: if the fact that the Gael interposes and is not allergenic does not hold it is not a Methodism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Gael is not a Methodism.; sent15 -> int4: the Gael is not gutsy if it is not a Methodism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Gael is not gutsy.; sent1 -> int6: that the Gael does not begin drizzle is true if it is not gutsy.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Gael does not begin drizzle.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gael begins drizzle.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: the junction is Nicaean.;
the drizzle is not a snakeblenny.
sent5 -> int10: the drizzle is not a snakeblenny if the fact that that it is a kind of non-Nicaean thing that is not a Methodism is right does not hold.; sent14 -> int11: if the drizzle is not gutsy then that it is non-Nicaean thing that is not a kind of a Methodism is not true.; sent11 -> int12: if the arousal is not phlegmy it is not a Truffaut or a confusion or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the junction is a pyridoxine if the fact that the Gael begins drizzle is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not gutsy it does not begin drizzle. sent2: if the fact that something interposes and is not allergenic is not true then it is not a Methodism. sent3: if something is not gutsy then it does begin drizzle. sent4: if the Gael is phocine then the fact that it is gutsy is correct. sent5: something is not a kind of a snakeblenny if the fact that it is a kind of non-Nicaean thing that is not a Methodism is false. sent6: if the Gael does not interpose then it is not a Methodism. sent7: if the arousal is not a kind of a Truffaut or it is a confusion or both then the Gael is a unselfconsciousness. sent8: the junction is not a ethnography. sent9: the Gael is not Nicaean if the fact that it is allergenic and does not interpose is false. sent10: the fact that the drizzle does not begin drizzle and is not a pyridoxine does not hold if the junction is not a kind of a unselfconsciousness. sent11: if something is not phlegmy either it is not a Truffaut or it is a confusion or both. sent12: the Gael begins drizzle if it is not gutsy. sent13: the fact that the Gael does interpose but it is not allergenic is incorrect if the junction is not Nicaean. sent14: if something is not gutsy then that it is a kind of non-Nicaean thing that is not a kind of a Methodism is incorrect. sent15: something is not gutsy if it is not a Methodism. sent16: something is not a Methodism if it does not interpose. sent17: the junction does not begin drizzle. sent18: the junction is not a unselfconsciousness if the Gael is a unselfconsciousness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the junction is not Nicaean.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that that the Gael interposes but it is not allergenic is incorrect is true.; sent2 -> int2: if the fact that the Gael interposes and is not allergenic does not hold it is not a Methodism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Gael is not a Methodism.; sent15 -> int4: the Gael is not gutsy if it is not a Methodism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Gael is not gutsy.; sent1 -> int6: that the Gael does not begin drizzle is true if it is not gutsy.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Gael does not begin drizzle.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gael begins drizzle.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: the junction is Nicaean.; __UNKNOWN__