the fact that the sirdar is raptorial and unsold is not right.
sent1: the challah does not reduce if that the bunker is a wingspan and it is raptorial is right. sent2: if the hackney does not camber but it does avoid outlier the bungalow is not unhappy. sent3: the hackney is not a camber and does avoid outlier. sent4: the challah reduces if something that does not antisepticize gamesmanship is not a vamp. sent5: the bunker is a wingspan if there is something such that it is not unhappy. sent6: there exists something such that it does not antisepticize gamesmanship and is not a vamp.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the bungalow is not unhappy.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not unhappy.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the bunker is a wingspan is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bunker is raptorial.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bunker is a wingspan and it is raptorial.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the challah does not reduce.; sent6 & sent4 -> int6: that the challah reduces is true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the bunker is non-raptorial is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sirdar is raptorial and unsold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the challah does not reduce if that the bunker is a wingspan and it is raptorial is right. sent2: if the hackney does not camber but it does avoid outlier the bungalow is not unhappy. sent3: the hackney is not a camber and does avoid outlier. sent4: the challah reduces if something that does not antisepticize gamesmanship is not a vamp. sent5: the bunker is a wingspan if there is something such that it is not unhappy. sent6: there exists something such that it does not antisepticize gamesmanship and is not a vamp. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the bungalow is not unhappy.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not unhappy.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the bunker is a wingspan is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bunker is raptorial.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bunker is a wingspan and it is raptorial.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the challah does not reduce.; sent6 & sent4 -> int6: that the challah reduces is true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the bunker is non-raptorial is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__