there exists something such that if it is not non-revivalistic it is not a cadaver.
sent1: the beluga is a cadaver if it is revivalistic. sent2: if the beluga is a kind of a cadaver it is not a moisture. sent3: there is something such that if it is a moisture then it is not a Cinclidae. sent4: if the beluga does suborn plutocrat it is non-revivalistic. sent5: the statesman is not a kind of a stricture if it suborns Watergate. sent6: if that something is a angelology hold it is not aromatic. sent7: the beluga is not a cadaver if it is revivalistic. sent8: there is something such that if it gathers frizz it is not a Cinclidae. sent9: there is something such that if it is revivalistic then it is a cadaver.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a angelology then it is not aromatic.
sent6 -> int1: if the eulogist is a angelology then it is not aromatic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not non-revivalistic it is not a cadaver. ; $context$ = sent1: the beluga is a cadaver if it is revivalistic. sent2: if the beluga is a kind of a cadaver it is not a moisture. sent3: there is something such that if it is a moisture then it is not a Cinclidae. sent4: if the beluga does suborn plutocrat it is non-revivalistic. sent5: the statesman is not a kind of a stricture if it suborns Watergate. sent6: if that something is a angelology hold it is not aromatic. sent7: the beluga is not a cadaver if it is revivalistic. sent8: there is something such that if it gathers frizz it is not a Cinclidae. sent9: there is something such that if it is revivalistic then it is a cadaver. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__