the ani is starless but it is not subcortical.
sent1: the fact that the moquette is not starless hold. sent2: there exists something such that it is not analogous and does not impact sparer. sent3: a phloem is an autobiography. sent4: the breakfast is not a phloem if the moquette is non-analogous. sent5: the fact that the breakfast is not subcortical and it does not impact sparer is not true. sent6: that the ani is starless and subcortical does not hold. sent7: the breakfast is not starless. sent8: if the moquette is not a phloem then the caricaturist is not starless. sent9: the ani is not an autobiography. sent10: if the breakfast is not an autobiography that it is not analogous and it does not impact sparer is not correct. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is not starless and it is not analogous is not right the ani is not an autobiography. sent12: the fact that that the caricaturist is starless and is not subcortical is not wrong is not true. sent13: the moquette is not a phloem if there exists something such that that it is not analogous and it does not impact sparer does not hold. sent14: that the breakfast is analogous but it does not impact sparer does not hold if it is not an autobiography. sent15: there exists something such that that it is analogous and it does not impact sparer does not hold. sent16: that the burden does not impact pilaster and it is starry is not correct. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is not analogous and it does impact sparer is not right. sent18: the fact that the ani is starless and is not subcortical is wrong if the caricaturist is not starless. sent19: the breakfast is not a kind of an autobiography. sent20: that the breakfast is a kind of analogous thing that does not impact sparer is false. sent21: the moquette is not a phloem if there is something such that it is analogous. sent22: the caricaturist is not a phloem.
sent10 & sent19 -> int1: that the breakfast is not analogous and does not impact sparer is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not analogous and does not impact sparer is incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the moquette is not a phloem.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the caricaturist is not starless.; sent18 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the ani is both starless and not subcortical.
sent3 -> int5: if the breakfast is a phloem it is a kind of an autobiography.;
$hypothesis$ = the ani is starless but it is not subcortical. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the moquette is not starless hold. sent2: there exists something such that it is not analogous and does not impact sparer. sent3: a phloem is an autobiography. sent4: the breakfast is not a phloem if the moquette is non-analogous. sent5: the fact that the breakfast is not subcortical and it does not impact sparer is not true. sent6: that the ani is starless and subcortical does not hold. sent7: the breakfast is not starless. sent8: if the moquette is not a phloem then the caricaturist is not starless. sent9: the ani is not an autobiography. sent10: if the breakfast is not an autobiography that it is not analogous and it does not impact sparer is not correct. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is not starless and it is not analogous is not right the ani is not an autobiography. sent12: the fact that that the caricaturist is starless and is not subcortical is not wrong is not true. sent13: the moquette is not a phloem if there exists something such that that it is not analogous and it does not impact sparer does not hold. sent14: that the breakfast is analogous but it does not impact sparer does not hold if it is not an autobiography. sent15: there exists something such that that it is analogous and it does not impact sparer does not hold. sent16: that the burden does not impact pilaster and it is starry is not correct. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is not analogous and it does impact sparer is not right. sent18: the fact that the ani is starless and is not subcortical is wrong if the caricaturist is not starless. sent19: the breakfast is not a kind of an autobiography. sent20: that the breakfast is a kind of analogous thing that does not impact sparer is false. sent21: the moquette is not a phloem if there is something such that it is analogous. sent22: the caricaturist is not a phloem. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent19 -> int1: that the breakfast is not analogous and does not impact sparer is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not analogous and does not impact sparer is incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the moquette is not a phloem.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the caricaturist is not starless.; sent18 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__