the fact that the snifter is a kind of a cane that does not flabbergast beta is incorrect.
sent1: the splinter is a kind of a cookhouse if that the iteration is not a goblet and is a cookhouse is wrong. sent2: the PET collects horsetail and is not a Xenopus. sent3: that something narrows and it is a thermoelectricity is not true if it is not profitable. sent4: the Hope does not collect horsetail and it is not a disinclination. sent5: the PET is not profitable if it collects horsetail and it is not a Xenopus. sent6: the fact that the snifter is a cane and it does flabbergast beta does not hold if it is not a thermoelectricity. sent7: the splinter is a Xenopus. sent8: if there are non-roentgenographic things then the snifter does cane. sent9: the betaine is roentgenographic if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a thermoelectricity. sent10: that something is a kind of a cookhouse and is a Xenopus does not hold if it is not profitable. sent11: there exists something such that it is a Schefflera and launches fizgig. sent12: the betaine is not acropetal. sent13: the snifter is not ossicular. sent14: if something is a cookhouse then that it is a kind of a cane and does not flabbergast beta is not true. sent15: if something that does not collect horsetail is not a disinclination the beebalm does not flabbergast beta. sent16: the fact that the iteration is not a goblet but it is a kind of a cookhouse is incorrect. sent17: the fact that something is hydrokinetic but it is not a kind of a Coigue is wrong if it is a D. sent18: the PET is not a Parthian. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it is narrowed thing that is a thermoelectricity is wrong then the betaine is roentgenographic. sent20: the snifter is a kind of a cookhouse if the betaine is roentgenographic. sent21: the lancewood is not roentgenographic if a Xenopus is a kind of a cookhouse.
sent3 -> int1: if that the PET is not profitable is true that it is a narrowed and it is a thermoelectricity is not correct.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the PET is not profitable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the PET is a narrowed and it is a thermoelectricity does not hold is correct.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a narrowed and it is a thermoelectricity is not right.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: that the betaine is roentgenographic is not incorrect.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the snifter is a cookhouse.; sent14 -> int7: that the snifter is a cane but it does not flabbergast beta is false if it is a cookhouse.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the snifter does cane and does not flabbergast beta.
sent1 & sent16 -> int8: the splinter is a cookhouse.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the splinter is a Xenopus and is a cookhouse.; int9 -> int10: something is a Xenopus and it is a cookhouse.; int10 & sent21 -> int11: that the lancewood is not roentgenographic is true.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is not roentgenographic.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: the snifter does cane.; sent4 -> int14: something does not collect horsetail and it is not a disinclination.; int14 & sent15 -> int15: the beebalm does not flabbergast beta.; int15 -> int16: something does not flabbergast beta.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the snifter is a kind of a cane that does not flabbergast beta is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the splinter is a kind of a cookhouse if that the iteration is not a goblet and is a cookhouse is wrong. sent2: the PET collects horsetail and is not a Xenopus. sent3: that something narrows and it is a thermoelectricity is not true if it is not profitable. sent4: the Hope does not collect horsetail and it is not a disinclination. sent5: the PET is not profitable if it collects horsetail and it is not a Xenopus. sent6: the fact that the snifter is a cane and it does flabbergast beta does not hold if it is not a thermoelectricity. sent7: the splinter is a Xenopus. sent8: if there are non-roentgenographic things then the snifter does cane. sent9: the betaine is roentgenographic if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a thermoelectricity. sent10: that something is a kind of a cookhouse and is a Xenopus does not hold if it is not profitable. sent11: there exists something such that it is a Schefflera and launches fizgig. sent12: the betaine is not acropetal. sent13: the snifter is not ossicular. sent14: if something is a cookhouse then that it is a kind of a cane and does not flabbergast beta is not true. sent15: if something that does not collect horsetail is not a disinclination the beebalm does not flabbergast beta. sent16: the fact that the iteration is not a goblet but it is a kind of a cookhouse is incorrect. sent17: the fact that something is hydrokinetic but it is not a kind of a Coigue is wrong if it is a D. sent18: the PET is not a Parthian. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it is narrowed thing that is a thermoelectricity is wrong then the betaine is roentgenographic. sent20: the snifter is a kind of a cookhouse if the betaine is roentgenographic. sent21: the lancewood is not roentgenographic if a Xenopus is a kind of a cookhouse. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if that the PET is not profitable is true that it is a narrowed and it is a thermoelectricity is not correct.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the PET is not profitable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the fact that the PET is a narrowed and it is a thermoelectricity does not hold is correct.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a narrowed and it is a thermoelectricity is not right.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: that the betaine is roentgenographic is not incorrect.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the snifter is a cookhouse.; sent14 -> int7: that the snifter is a cane but it does not flabbergast beta is false if it is a cookhouse.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__