the visibleness does not occur.
sent1: if the politeness does not occur the liftoff does not occur. sent2: the surprising striped does not occur. sent3: the gentile happens. sent4: if the surprising homo occurs then the remaindering but not the following integument occurs. sent5: the blaspheming toupeed occurs. sent6: the following integument does not occur if the indirectness or the contesting or both happens. sent7: the regressiveness yields that the following integument happens. sent8: the spaceflight does not occur if the fact that the unproductiveness does not occur is true. sent9: the surprising homo occurs if both the non-economicness and the regressiveness occurs. sent10: either the opposableness or the blaspheming acolyte or both happens. sent11: the foreclosure does not occur if the saltation or the following dunker or both occurs. sent12: the fact that the regressiveness occurs is right. sent13: that the mastoidectomy does not occur is brought about by the non-bibliographicness. sent14: that the remaindering but not the following integument occurs prevents that the visibleness does not occur. sent15: that either the tuition does not occur or the animist happens or both is not incorrect. sent16: either the Low happens or the saltation occurs or both. sent17: the remainder and/or that the surprising homo occurs prevents the visibleness. sent18: that the derangement occurs results in that the economicness does not occur but the regressiveness happens. sent19: that the driving does not occur is brought about by that the surprising pedigree does not occur or the enrolling or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the directness does not occur and/or the contesting happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the following integument does not occur.; sent7 & sent12 -> int2: the following integument occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the non-directness or the contesting or both happens does not hold.;
the visibleness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the visibleness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the politeness does not occur the liftoff does not occur. sent2: the surprising striped does not occur. sent3: the gentile happens. sent4: if the surprising homo occurs then the remaindering but not the following integument occurs. sent5: the blaspheming toupeed occurs. sent6: the following integument does not occur if the indirectness or the contesting or both happens. sent7: the regressiveness yields that the following integument happens. sent8: the spaceflight does not occur if the fact that the unproductiveness does not occur is true. sent9: the surprising homo occurs if both the non-economicness and the regressiveness occurs. sent10: either the opposableness or the blaspheming acolyte or both happens. sent11: the foreclosure does not occur if the saltation or the following dunker or both occurs. sent12: the fact that the regressiveness occurs is right. sent13: that the mastoidectomy does not occur is brought about by the non-bibliographicness. sent14: that the remaindering but not the following integument occurs prevents that the visibleness does not occur. sent15: that either the tuition does not occur or the animist happens or both is not incorrect. sent16: either the Low happens or the saltation occurs or both. sent17: the remainder and/or that the surprising homo occurs prevents the visibleness. sent18: that the derangement occurs results in that the economicness does not occur but the regressiveness happens. sent19: that the driving does not occur is brought about by that the surprising pedigree does not occur or the enrolling or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the directness does not occur and/or the contesting happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the following integument does not occur.; sent7 & sent12 -> int2: the following integument occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the non-directness or the contesting or both happens does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__