there exists something such that if it does not bespangle vasodilation then that it does scald vertebra and it is not a kind of a PIE is not true.
sent1: the fact that something is not a kind of a monomer and it is not a kind of a braggadocio is false if it is not moderating. sent2: if something does not bespangle Activase that it is not a juvenescence and it is not a Tombigbee does not hold. sent3: the undercut is not a watermeal if something is not a kind of a drawers and is not a coxsackievirus. sent4: if the regulation is not a kind of a monomer the fact that the timothy is acidimetric and does not bespangle vasodilation does not hold. sent5: the regulation scalds vertebra but it is not a PIE if it does not bespangle vasodilation. sent6: there is something such that if it does not bespangle vasodilation the fact that it scalds vertebra and is a PIE is incorrect. sent7: the two-timer does not decline. sent8: something is not a drawers and not a coxsackievirus if it is a kind of a juvenescence. sent9: if the fact that something is not a juvenescence and is not a kind of a Tombigbee does not hold it is a kind of a juvenescence. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Warji then that it is a businesspeople and it is non-indexless is not correct. sent11: if something is not a watermeal it does not moderate or it is not nonspecific or both. sent12: if that the two-timer is a solicitation is not wrong then the monotheist is isomeric. sent13: if the fact that the undercut is not a monomer and it is not a kind of a braggadocio does not hold the regulation is not a kind of a monomer. sent14: something does not moderate if it does not moderate and/or it is not nonspecific. sent15: if something is isomeric then it does not bespangle Activase. sent16: the two-timer is a solicitation that is a kind of a Warji if it does not decline.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the regulation scalds vertebra and is not a PIE.;
the fact that the timothy is acidimetric and does not bespangle vasodilation does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: if the undercut does not moderate then the fact that it is both not a monomer and not a braggadocio is not correct.; sent14 -> int2: if the undercut is not moderating and/or it is not nonspecific then it is not moderating.; sent11 -> int3: the undercut is not moderating or it is specific or both if it is not a watermeal.; sent8 -> int4: if the monotheist is a juvenescence it is not a drawers and not a coxsackievirus.; sent9 -> int5: the monotheist is a kind of a juvenescence if the fact that it is both not a juvenescence and not a Tombigbee is not true.; sent2 -> int6: that if the monotheist does not bespangle Activase the fact that the monotheist is not a juvenescence and not a Tombigbee is wrong is right.; sent15 -> int7: if the monotheist is isomeric it does not bespangle Activase.; sent16 & sent7 -> int8: the two-timer is a solicitation and it is a Warji.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the two-timer is not a solicitation does not hold.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the monotheist is isomeric.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the monotheist does not bespangle Activase.; int6 & int11 -> int12: that the monotheist is not a juvenescence and it is not a Tombigbee is wrong.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the monotheist is a juvenescence.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the monotheist is not a kind of a drawers and it is not a kind of a coxsackievirus.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it is not a drawers and is not a coxsackievirus.; int15 & sent3 -> int16: the undercut is not a watermeal.; int3 & int16 -> int17: the undercut is not moderating or it is not nonspecific or both.; int2 & int17 -> int18: that the undercut does not moderate is right.; int1 & int18 -> int19: that the undercut is not a monomer and it is not a braggadocio is not true.; sent13 & int19 -> int20: the regulation is not a monomer.; sent4 & int20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not bespangle vasodilation then that it does scald vertebra and it is not a kind of a PIE is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a kind of a monomer and it is not a kind of a braggadocio is false if it is not moderating. sent2: if something does not bespangle Activase that it is not a juvenescence and it is not a Tombigbee does not hold. sent3: the undercut is not a watermeal if something is not a kind of a drawers and is not a coxsackievirus. sent4: if the regulation is not a kind of a monomer the fact that the timothy is acidimetric and does not bespangle vasodilation does not hold. sent5: the regulation scalds vertebra but it is not a PIE if it does not bespangle vasodilation. sent6: there is something such that if it does not bespangle vasodilation the fact that it scalds vertebra and is a PIE is incorrect. sent7: the two-timer does not decline. sent8: something is not a drawers and not a coxsackievirus if it is a kind of a juvenescence. sent9: if the fact that something is not a juvenescence and is not a kind of a Tombigbee does not hold it is a kind of a juvenescence. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Warji then that it is a businesspeople and it is non-indexless is not correct. sent11: if something is not a watermeal it does not moderate or it is not nonspecific or both. sent12: if that the two-timer is a solicitation is not wrong then the monotheist is isomeric. sent13: if the fact that the undercut is not a monomer and it is not a kind of a braggadocio does not hold the regulation is not a kind of a monomer. sent14: something does not moderate if it does not moderate and/or it is not nonspecific. sent15: if something is isomeric then it does not bespangle Activase. sent16: the two-timer is a solicitation that is a kind of a Warji if it does not decline. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the regulation scalds vertebra and is not a PIE.; __UNKNOWN__