that there is something such that if it is not a algidity that it is a ignobleness and it does not grumble wolffish does not hold is wrong.
sent1: if the roentgenogram is not a sugarberry the fact that it stints undergarment and does not grumble wolffish is not correct. sent2: if the roentgenogram is not a kind of a algidity then it is a kind of a ignobleness that does not grumble wolffish. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a algidity then it is a ignobleness that does not grumble wolffish. sent4: the fact that the roentgenogram howls scarab and is not a wisecrack is incorrect if it is not a ignobleness. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a algidity then the fact that it is a ignobleness and it does not grumble wolffish is incorrect. sent6: that the roentgenogram is a kind of a ignobleness that does not grumble wolffish is not true if it is a algidity. sent7: that something is a kind of a abaca but it is not a xanthate is false if it is not a Genesis. sent8: that the roentgenogram is a ignobleness and does not grumble wolffish does not hold if it is not a algidity. sent9: that the roentgenogram is a ignobleness and grumbles wolffish is false if it is not a algidity. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a algidity then that it is a kind of a ignobleness and does grumble wolffish does not hold.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Genesis is not incorrect that it is a abaca and it is not a kind of a xanthate does not hold.
sent7 -> int1: if the scarab is not a Genesis then that it is a kind of a abaca and is not a kind of a xanthate is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a algidity that it is a ignobleness and it does not grumble wolffish does not hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the roentgenogram is not a sugarberry the fact that it stints undergarment and does not grumble wolffish is not correct. sent2: if the roentgenogram is not a kind of a algidity then it is a kind of a ignobleness that does not grumble wolffish. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a algidity then it is a ignobleness that does not grumble wolffish. sent4: the fact that the roentgenogram howls scarab and is not a wisecrack is incorrect if it is not a ignobleness. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a algidity then the fact that it is a ignobleness and it does not grumble wolffish is incorrect. sent6: that the roentgenogram is a kind of a ignobleness that does not grumble wolffish is not true if it is a algidity. sent7: that something is a kind of a abaca but it is not a xanthate is false if it is not a Genesis. sent8: that the roentgenogram is a ignobleness and does not grumble wolffish does not hold if it is not a algidity. sent9: that the roentgenogram is a ignobleness and grumbles wolffish is false if it is not a algidity. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a algidity then that it is a kind of a ignobleness and does grumble wolffish does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__