the fact that the dogfighter is not postnuptial and it is not a hotdog is wrong.
sent1: everything is not a kind of a scours and is a kind of a partial. sent2: that something is not postnuptial and it is not a hotdog does not hold if that it is a kind of an augmentation is right. sent3: if the Lascar is a kind of an augmentation then the claustrum is a kind of an augmentation. sent4: everything is not a scours. sent5: if the dogfighter is an augmentation then that it is postnuptial and it is not a kind of a hotdog is incorrect. sent6: something is a kind of a spectrograph if it clinches chopine. sent7: if something that does scour is a kind of a partial it is a kind of an augmentation. sent8: if there is something such that it is nonrandom and it is not a sapremia then that the VLDL does clinch chopine hold. sent9: that something is a kind of non-postnuptial a hotdog is not right if the fact that it is an augmentation hold. sent10: if something that does not scour is partial then the fact that it is a kind of an augmentation is right. sent11: there exists something such that it is nonrandom and it is not a sapremia. sent12: the dogfighter is an augmentation if it is a kind of a scours that is a partial.
sent10 -> int1: that the dogfighter is an augmentation is not wrong if it does not scour and it is a kind of a partial.; sent1 -> int2: the dogfighter is not a scours but it is a kind of a partial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dogfighter is an augmentation.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the dogfighter is not postnuptial and it is not a hotdog is incorrect if it is an augmentation.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the claustrum is an augmentation is not false.
sent6 -> int5: the VLDL is a spectrograph if it does clinch chopine.; sent11 & sent8 -> int6: the VLDL clinches chopine.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the VLDL is a spectrograph.; int7 -> int8: something is a spectrograph.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dogfighter is not postnuptial and it is not a hotdog is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is not a kind of a scours and is a kind of a partial. sent2: that something is not postnuptial and it is not a hotdog does not hold if that it is a kind of an augmentation is right. sent3: if the Lascar is a kind of an augmentation then the claustrum is a kind of an augmentation. sent4: everything is not a scours. sent5: if the dogfighter is an augmentation then that it is postnuptial and it is not a kind of a hotdog is incorrect. sent6: something is a kind of a spectrograph if it clinches chopine. sent7: if something that does scour is a kind of a partial it is a kind of an augmentation. sent8: if there is something such that it is nonrandom and it is not a sapremia then that the VLDL does clinch chopine hold. sent9: that something is a kind of non-postnuptial a hotdog is not right if the fact that it is an augmentation hold. sent10: if something that does not scour is partial then the fact that it is a kind of an augmentation is right. sent11: there exists something such that it is nonrandom and it is not a sapremia. sent12: the dogfighter is an augmentation if it is a kind of a scours that is a partial. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: that the dogfighter is an augmentation is not wrong if it does not scour and it is a kind of a partial.; sent1 -> int2: the dogfighter is not a scours but it is a kind of a partial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dogfighter is an augmentation.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the dogfighter is not postnuptial and it is not a hotdog is incorrect if it is an augmentation.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__