that the neutralization is not a kind of an attractiveness hold.
sent1: there exists something such that it does not bake. sent2: the pumpernickel does not bake. sent3: there exists something such that that it does antisepticize pumpernickel and is not a kind of a homeotherm is not correct. sent4: if the reagent is an attractiveness the neutralization is an attractiveness. sent5: the neutralization is a Hawaiian if there is something such that it is an attractiveness and it does not bake. sent6: the reagent is not an attractiveness. sent7: there is something such that it does antisepticize Psidium and is changeless. sent8: there exists something such that that it antisepticizes pumpernickel and it is a homeotherm does not hold. sent9: the reagent is an attractiveness if the moonbeam is a kind of an attractiveness. sent10: the reagent is a kind of a Hawaiian if something antisepticizes Edward and it does bake. sent11: if something is not punic then it does antisepticize Edward and does not bake. sent12: the pumpernickel is not punic if something that does not antisepticize Psidium is changeless. sent13: if the pumpernickel is not punic the fact that it does bake is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that it is a Hawaiian. sent15: if the Kenyan is not changeless the moonbeam does not droop and it is not punic. sent16: the neutralization bakes. sent17: there is something such that it does not antisepticize Psidium and it is changeless. sent18: something does not antisepticize Psidium. sent19: if something that antisepticizes Edward does not bake then the reagent is a Hawaiian. sent20: the neutralization is not an attractiveness if there exists something such that the fact that it is Hawaiian and droops is not false. sent21: something does not bake if the fact that it is not punic is correct. sent22: the reagent does avoid nucellus. sent23: the condyle is changeless and it antisepticizes Psidium if it does not antisepticize pumpernickel. sent24: that something does antisepticize pumpernickel and is not a homeotherm is right. sent25: if something is a homeotherm the reagent does droop. sent26: there is something such that it droops.
sent11 -> int1: if the pumpernickel is not punic then it does antisepticize Edward and it does not bake.; sent17 & sent12 -> int2: the pumpernickel is not punic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pumpernickel does antisepticize Edward but it does not bake.; int3 -> int4: something does antisepticize Edward but it does not bake.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the reagent is a Hawaiian.;
the neutralization is an attractiveness.
$hypothesis$ = that the neutralization is not a kind of an attractiveness hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does not bake. sent2: the pumpernickel does not bake. sent3: there exists something such that that it does antisepticize pumpernickel and is not a kind of a homeotherm is not correct. sent4: if the reagent is an attractiveness the neutralization is an attractiveness. sent5: the neutralization is a Hawaiian if there is something such that it is an attractiveness and it does not bake. sent6: the reagent is not an attractiveness. sent7: there is something such that it does antisepticize Psidium and is changeless. sent8: there exists something such that that it antisepticizes pumpernickel and it is a homeotherm does not hold. sent9: the reagent is an attractiveness if the moonbeam is a kind of an attractiveness. sent10: the reagent is a kind of a Hawaiian if something antisepticizes Edward and it does bake. sent11: if something is not punic then it does antisepticize Edward and does not bake. sent12: the pumpernickel is not punic if something that does not antisepticize Psidium is changeless. sent13: if the pumpernickel is not punic the fact that it does bake is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that it is a Hawaiian. sent15: if the Kenyan is not changeless the moonbeam does not droop and it is not punic. sent16: the neutralization bakes. sent17: there is something such that it does not antisepticize Psidium and it is changeless. sent18: something does not antisepticize Psidium. sent19: if something that antisepticizes Edward does not bake then the reagent is a Hawaiian. sent20: the neutralization is not an attractiveness if there exists something such that the fact that it is Hawaiian and droops is not false. sent21: something does not bake if the fact that it is not punic is correct. sent22: the reagent does avoid nucellus. sent23: the condyle is changeless and it antisepticizes Psidium if it does not antisepticize pumpernickel. sent24: that something does antisepticize pumpernickel and is not a homeotherm is right. sent25: if something is a homeotherm the reagent does droop. sent26: there is something such that it droops. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the pumpernickel is not punic then it does antisepticize Edward and it does not bake.; sent17 & sent12 -> int2: the pumpernickel is not punic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pumpernickel does antisepticize Edward but it does not bake.; int3 -> int4: something does antisepticize Edward but it does not bake.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the reagent is a Hawaiian.; __UNKNOWN__