if that the fracturing ligne happens is right then that the decentralization does not occur is correct.
sent1: that both the fracturing ligne and the counterpoint happens prevents the decentralization. sent2: if the impoliteness does not occur then both the non-acervateness and the jogging happens. sent3: both the echocardiography and the shellfire occurs. sent4: the fact that the non-acervateness and the jogging occurs is not true if the counterpointing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the counterpointing does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the acervateness does not occur but the jogging occurs is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = if that the fracturing ligne happens is right then that the decentralization does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the fracturing ligne and the counterpoint happens prevents the decentralization. sent2: if the impoliteness does not occur then both the non-acervateness and the jogging happens. sent3: both the echocardiography and the shellfire occurs. sent4: the fact that the non-acervateness and the jogging occurs is not true if the counterpointing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the counterpointing does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the acervateness does not occur but the jogging occurs is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__