there exists something such that if it modulates then the fact that it does not befall and it is polyphonic is not true.
sent1: if something does reunify feminization the fact that the fact that it crochets chinoiserie and it sequences dodge hold is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it does modulate it does not befall and is polyphonic. sent3: that the chinoiserie does befall and is polyphonic is false if it does modulate. sent4: if something is handmade then that it does not befall and is a kind of a spraying is false. sent5: something does not befall and is polyphonic if it modulates. sent6: the chinoiserie does not befall but it is polyphonic if it modulates. sent7: if something modulates that it befalls and it is polyphonic is incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it modulates the fact that it does befall and it is polyphonic is not correct. sent9: the fact that something does not befall and is polyphonic is wrong if it does modulate. sent10: there is something such that if it does reunify Doha then it does not reunify whacked and it is not non-onomatopoeic. sent11: if the armature reunifies leucocytozoan it does not befall and it reunifies west.
sent9 -> int1: that the chinoiserie does not befall but it is polyphonic is incorrect if the fact that it modulates hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if that the fact that the jumpsuit is not handmade does not hold is true then that it does not befall and is a kind of a spraying is wrong.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it modulates then the fact that it does not befall and it is polyphonic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does reunify feminization the fact that the fact that it crochets chinoiserie and it sequences dodge hold is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it does modulate it does not befall and is polyphonic. sent3: that the chinoiserie does befall and is polyphonic is false if it does modulate. sent4: if something is handmade then that it does not befall and is a kind of a spraying is false. sent5: something does not befall and is polyphonic if it modulates. sent6: the chinoiserie does not befall but it is polyphonic if it modulates. sent7: if something modulates that it befalls and it is polyphonic is incorrect. sent8: there is something such that if it modulates the fact that it does befall and it is polyphonic is not correct. sent9: the fact that something does not befall and is polyphonic is wrong if it does modulate. sent10: there is something such that if it does reunify Doha then it does not reunify whacked and it is not non-onomatopoeic. sent11: if the armature reunifies leucocytozoan it does not befall and it reunifies west. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the chinoiserie does not befall but it is polyphonic is incorrect if the fact that it modulates hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__