the melon is fibrinous.
sent1: the ferment does not group nightmare and is anaphoric. sent2: the jampot is a craftiness if the ferment does not pour lode but it is anaphoric. sent3: the fact that if the pinto does not overturn rhumb the pinto is a kind of a craftiness and/or does not group nightmare is right. sent4: the pinto is fibrinous if the melon does not group nightmare but it is anaphoric. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of an adopter. sent6: the pinto does not overturn rhumb. sent7: the ferment is anaphoric. sent8: the ferment does not pour lode and is anaphoric if there is something such that it is an adopter. sent9: there is something such that it does pour lode. sent10: if there exists something such that it is a kind of an adopter that the ferment is anaphoric hold. sent11: if the pinto does group nightmare the melon is fibrinous. sent12: the pinto is anaphoric if the ferment is non-fibrinous thing that does group nightmare. sent13: if the jampot is a craftiness the pinto groups nightmare. sent14: the melon is anaphoric. sent15: the pinto is a demolition. sent16: the melon is a kind of a craftiness. sent17: the fact that the ferment is anaphoric and not an adopter does not hold if the fact that the jampot pours lode is correct. sent18: something is an adopter if the fact that it is a kind of anaphoric thing that is not an adopter is false. sent19: if the jampot is fibrinous then the melon is a craftiness.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the ferment does not pour lode but it is anaphoric.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: that the jampot is a craftiness is right.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: the pinto groups nightmare.; sent11 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the melon is not fibrinous.
sent18 -> int4: if that the ferment is a kind of anaphoric thing that is not an adopter is not correct then it is a kind of an adopter.; sent3 & sent6 -> int5: the pinto is a kind of a craftiness and/or does not group nightmare.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that either it is a kind of a craftiness or it does not group nightmare or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the melon is fibrinous. ; $context$ = sent1: the ferment does not group nightmare and is anaphoric. sent2: the jampot is a craftiness if the ferment does not pour lode but it is anaphoric. sent3: the fact that if the pinto does not overturn rhumb the pinto is a kind of a craftiness and/or does not group nightmare is right. sent4: the pinto is fibrinous if the melon does not group nightmare but it is anaphoric. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of an adopter. sent6: the pinto does not overturn rhumb. sent7: the ferment is anaphoric. sent8: the ferment does not pour lode and is anaphoric if there is something such that it is an adopter. sent9: there is something such that it does pour lode. sent10: if there exists something such that it is a kind of an adopter that the ferment is anaphoric hold. sent11: if the pinto does group nightmare the melon is fibrinous. sent12: the pinto is anaphoric if the ferment is non-fibrinous thing that does group nightmare. sent13: if the jampot is a craftiness the pinto groups nightmare. sent14: the melon is anaphoric. sent15: the pinto is a demolition. sent16: the melon is a kind of a craftiness. sent17: the fact that the ferment is anaphoric and not an adopter does not hold if the fact that the jampot pours lode is correct. sent18: something is an adopter if the fact that it is a kind of anaphoric thing that is not an adopter is false. sent19: if the jampot is fibrinous then the melon is a craftiness. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the ferment does not pour lode but it is anaphoric.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: that the jampot is a craftiness is right.; sent13 & int2 -> int3: the pinto groups nightmare.; sent11 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__