that if the fact that the wisteria does stuff sojourn and it is a kind of a bridoon hold the armorer is not architectural does not hold.
sent1: if the toadflax does stuff commandant then that the representation does not stuff commandant and is unmindful does not hold. sent2: the fact that the armorer is not ungrammatical is not false if the aviary is avian. sent3: if something is not ungrammatical it is not architectural. sent4: if that the toadflax does not stuff commandant and is not mindful is wrong the representation is ungrammatical. sent5: that the aviary is avian is not wrong if the representation is not unmindful. sent6: the aviary is avian if that the representation does not stuff commandant but it is unmindful does not hold. sent7: the toadflax does stuff commandant if the wisteria is a bridoon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wisteria stuffs sojourn and is a bridoon.; assump1 -> int1: the wisteria is a bridoon.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the toadflax stuffs commandant.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the representation does not stuff commandant and is unmindful is wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the aviary is not avian is not right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the armorer is not ungrammatical.; sent3 -> int6: if the armorer is not ungrammatical then it is non-architectural.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the armorer is not architectural.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the wisteria does stuff sojourn and it is a kind of a bridoon hold the armorer is not architectural does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the toadflax does stuff commandant then that the representation does not stuff commandant and is unmindful does not hold. sent2: the fact that the armorer is not ungrammatical is not false if the aviary is avian. sent3: if something is not ungrammatical it is not architectural. sent4: if that the toadflax does not stuff commandant and is not mindful is wrong the representation is ungrammatical. sent5: that the aviary is avian is not wrong if the representation is not unmindful. sent6: the aviary is avian if that the representation does not stuff commandant but it is unmindful does not hold. sent7: the toadflax does stuff commandant if the wisteria is a bridoon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wisteria stuffs sojourn and is a bridoon.; assump1 -> int1: the wisteria is a bridoon.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the toadflax stuffs commandant.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the representation does not stuff commandant and is unmindful is wrong.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the aviary is not avian is not right.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the armorer is not ungrammatical.; sent3 -> int6: if the armorer is not ungrammatical then it is non-architectural.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the armorer is not architectural.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__