that the chlorambucil is a conglomerate is not incorrect.
sent1: that the chlorambucil is a hostile is not false if it is a caroler that does not enlarge. sent2: the speculum is commensurate if it is hydrolyzable. sent3: the backsword is unwieldy and/or is a kind of a hostile. sent4: if the chlorambucil is not a caroler or it is not a kind of a hostile or both then the speculum is not a kind of a caroler. sent5: if the chlorambucil is amoebic that it is not a conglomerate is true. sent6: there is something such that it is not a rough or it does play crossbencher or both. sent7: if something does not rough or does play crossbencher or both then the Kirghiz does overturn pollucite. sent8: if the Kirghiz does overturn pollucite the speculum is hydrolyzable. sent9: the chlorambucil is not a conglomerate if either it is a hostile or it is amoebic or both. sent10: the curry enlarges if it is amoebic. sent11: if the speculum is commensurate then the chlorambucil is not a caroler and does not enlarge. sent12: if the Kirghiz is hydrolyzable the gluon overturns pollucite. sent13: if the chlorambucil is not a caroler and it does not enlarge it is a hostile.
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the Kirghiz does overturn pollucite.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the speculum is hydrolyzable.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the speculum is commensurate is correct.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the chlorambucil is not a caroler and it does not enlarge.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the chlorambucil is a hostile.; int5 -> int6: the chlorambucil is a hostile and/or is amoebic.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the gluon overturns pollucite.
$hypothesis$ = that the chlorambucil is a conglomerate is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the chlorambucil is a hostile is not false if it is a caroler that does not enlarge. sent2: the speculum is commensurate if it is hydrolyzable. sent3: the backsword is unwieldy and/or is a kind of a hostile. sent4: if the chlorambucil is not a caroler or it is not a kind of a hostile or both then the speculum is not a kind of a caroler. sent5: if the chlorambucil is amoebic that it is not a conglomerate is true. sent6: there is something such that it is not a rough or it does play crossbencher or both. sent7: if something does not rough or does play crossbencher or both then the Kirghiz does overturn pollucite. sent8: if the Kirghiz does overturn pollucite the speculum is hydrolyzable. sent9: the chlorambucil is not a conglomerate if either it is a hostile or it is amoebic or both. sent10: the curry enlarges if it is amoebic. sent11: if the speculum is commensurate then the chlorambucil is not a caroler and does not enlarge. sent12: if the Kirghiz is hydrolyzable the gluon overturns pollucite. sent13: if the chlorambucil is not a caroler and it does not enlarge it is a hostile. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the Kirghiz does overturn pollucite.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the speculum is hydrolyzable.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the speculum is commensurate is correct.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the chlorambucil is not a caroler and it does not enlarge.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the chlorambucil is a hostile.; int5 -> int6: the chlorambucil is a hostile and/or is amoebic.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__