the sauceboat eulogizes bracer.
sent1: that something is not plantal but it is a kind of a Sinclair is false if it is not a perinatologist. sent2: there exists nothing that is not a Sinclair and does not eulogize brachiation. sent3: that either the madrilene remainders Lindera or it is not unknowable or both is not right if the masking does not eulogize brachiation. sent4: the fact that the mangosteen is appointive if there exists something such that the fact that it remainders Lindera or it is not unknowable or both is not correct is not false. sent5: the peat does stifle tillage. sent6: if the attendant is an import the sauceboat does eulogize bracer. sent7: The tillage does stifle peat. sent8: the fact that the masking does not eulogize brachiation is not false if the fact that the peat is not plantal but it is a kind of a Sinclair does not hold. sent9: either the peat does stifle tillage or it does not eulogize bracer or both if the masking is not a kind of a perinatologist. sent10: that something does not stifle tillage and is not a perinatologist is not right if it is plantal. sent11: the peat is not a perinatologist if the fact that it does stifle tillage hold.
sent11 & sent5 -> int1: the peat is not a perinatologist.; sent1 -> int2: that the peat is not plantal but it is a kind of a Sinclair is wrong if it is not a kind of a perinatologist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the peat is not plantal and is a Sinclair does not hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the masking does not eulogize brachiation.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the madrilene does remainder Lindera and/or it is knowable is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it remainders Lindera and/or it is not unknowable is not correct.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the mangosteen is appointive.;
the sauceboat does not eulogize bracer.
$hypothesis$ = the sauceboat eulogizes bracer. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not plantal but it is a kind of a Sinclair is false if it is not a perinatologist. sent2: there exists nothing that is not a Sinclair and does not eulogize brachiation. sent3: that either the madrilene remainders Lindera or it is not unknowable or both is not right if the masking does not eulogize brachiation. sent4: the fact that the mangosteen is appointive if there exists something such that the fact that it remainders Lindera or it is not unknowable or both is not correct is not false. sent5: the peat does stifle tillage. sent6: if the attendant is an import the sauceboat does eulogize bracer. sent7: The tillage does stifle peat. sent8: the fact that the masking does not eulogize brachiation is not false if the fact that the peat is not plantal but it is a kind of a Sinclair does not hold. sent9: either the peat does stifle tillage or it does not eulogize bracer or both if the masking is not a kind of a perinatologist. sent10: that something does not stifle tillage and is not a perinatologist is not right if it is plantal. sent11: the peat is not a perinatologist if the fact that it does stifle tillage hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent5 -> int1: the peat is not a perinatologist.; sent1 -> int2: that the peat is not plantal but it is a kind of a Sinclair is wrong if it is not a kind of a perinatologist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the peat is not plantal and is a Sinclair does not hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the masking does not eulogize brachiation.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the madrilene does remainder Lindera and/or it is knowable is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it remainders Lindera and/or it is not unknowable is not correct.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the mangosteen is appointive.; __UNKNOWN__