the titmouse is not a Ptilonorhynchidae.
sent1: if the draper is not a clear then it does inflate Fonda and is psychosexual. sent2: the fact that something is not a cut but it is a clear does not hold if it is psychosexual. sent3: if the titmouse does not cloud gerbil then that it is a inculcation and it does inflate sandgrouse hold. sent4: The gerbil does not cloud titmouse. sent5: something is a Ptilonorhynchidae if it inflates Fonda. sent6: the titmouse does inflate sandgrouse. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a corrosion and it is not a divulgence does not hold. sent8: the Hispanic is clear. sent9: the fact that the draper is a cut and inflates sandgrouse does not hold if it does cloud gerbil. sent10: the titmouse is not a crucifixion if it does cut and clouds gerbil. sent11: if the mailman clouds gerbil and it clears it does not inflate Fonda. sent12: the titmouse does not cloud gerbil. sent13: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a inculcation and does not inflate sandgrouse is true. sent14: the governor is not a kind of a crucifixion if that the mailman does not inflate Fonda but it is a kind of a crucifixion is not correct. sent15: the titmouse is not unclear if the dainty does not inflate sandgrouse and does not cloud gerbil. sent16: the titmouse does cloud gerbil and it is a inculcation if it does not clear. sent17: if there exists something such that that it is not a cut and not unclear is not true the titmouse is a crucifixion. sent18: that if the mailman inflates Fonda then the draper is psychosexual is true. sent19: if the titmouse is a crucifixion and is a Ptilonorhynchidae then it is not a inculcation. sent20: if the titmouse does cut and it is a clear then the draper does not clear. sent21: the fact that the titmouse is both not a inculcation and not a Ptilonorhynchidae is not right. sent22: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a corrosion and not a divulgence is wrong the mailman inflates Fonda. sent23: something does not cloud gerbil and it is not a Ptilonorhynchidae. sent24: the fact that something is both a cut and clear does not hold if it is psychosexual.
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the draper is not cut but it is a clear is incorrect if that it is psychosexual is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the titmouse is a Ptilonorhynchidae.; sent3 & sent12 -> int2: the titmouse is a kind of a inculcation and inflates sandgrouse.; int2 -> int3: the titmouse is a kind of a inculcation.;
the governor is not a crucifixion.
$hypothesis$ = the titmouse is not a Ptilonorhynchidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if the draper is not a clear then it does inflate Fonda and is psychosexual. sent2: the fact that something is not a cut but it is a clear does not hold if it is psychosexual. sent3: if the titmouse does not cloud gerbil then that it is a inculcation and it does inflate sandgrouse hold. sent4: The gerbil does not cloud titmouse. sent5: something is a Ptilonorhynchidae if it inflates Fonda. sent6: the titmouse does inflate sandgrouse. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a corrosion and it is not a divulgence does not hold. sent8: the Hispanic is clear. sent9: the fact that the draper is a cut and inflates sandgrouse does not hold if it does cloud gerbil. sent10: the titmouse is not a crucifixion if it does cut and clouds gerbil. sent11: if the mailman clouds gerbil and it clears it does not inflate Fonda. sent12: the titmouse does not cloud gerbil. sent13: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a inculcation and does not inflate sandgrouse is true. sent14: the governor is not a kind of a crucifixion if that the mailman does not inflate Fonda but it is a kind of a crucifixion is not correct. sent15: the titmouse is not unclear if the dainty does not inflate sandgrouse and does not cloud gerbil. sent16: the titmouse does cloud gerbil and it is a inculcation if it does not clear. sent17: if there exists something such that that it is not a cut and not unclear is not true the titmouse is a crucifixion. sent18: that if the mailman inflates Fonda then the draper is psychosexual is true. sent19: if the titmouse is a crucifixion and is a Ptilonorhynchidae then it is not a inculcation. sent20: if the titmouse does cut and it is a clear then the draper does not clear. sent21: the fact that the titmouse is both not a inculcation and not a Ptilonorhynchidae is not right. sent22: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a corrosion and not a divulgence is wrong the mailman inflates Fonda. sent23: something does not cloud gerbil and it is not a Ptilonorhynchidae. sent24: the fact that something is both a cut and clear does not hold if it is psychosexual. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the draper is not cut but it is a clear is incorrect if that it is psychosexual is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the titmouse is a Ptilonorhynchidae.; sent3 & sent12 -> int2: the titmouse is a kind of a inculcation and inflates sandgrouse.; int2 -> int3: the titmouse is a kind of a inculcation.; __UNKNOWN__