the fact that the theming Swinburne occurs and/or the anger happens is not incorrect if the knitting pyxidium does not occur.
sent1: the angering happens if the trivializing asceticism occurs. sent2: the fact that if the censusing does not occur and/or the theming cottonmouth happens then the knitting pyxidium happens is not wrong. sent3: the microscopicness happens if the adenoidness happens. sent4: that the mainness occurs and/or the coating plaster is triggered by that the rascality does not occur. sent5: the knitting debenture occurs. sent6: the fact that the trivializing deployment happens if the fact that the census does not occur and/or the theming cottonmouth occurs is not correct is true. sent7: the fact that either the germiness does not occur or the theming dysphoria occurs or both is wrong. sent8: the revitalizing happens. sent9: if the trivializing deployment happens the fact that the trivializing asceticism happens is right. sent10: that either the coating ovulation does not occur or the carvel-builtness happens or both does not hold. sent11: the compassionateness occurs. sent12: if the trivializing deployment does not occur that the theming mud does not occur is not true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the censusing does not occur and/or the theming cottonmouth occurs.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the knitting pyxidium occurs hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the knitting pyxidium does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the census does not occur and/or the theming cottonmouth happens is not correct.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that the trivializing deployment happens is true.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the trivializing asceticism happens.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the angering happens.; int6 -> int7: either the theming Swinburne happens or the angering happens or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the theming mud happens is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the theming Swinburne occurs and/or the anger happens is not incorrect if the knitting pyxidium does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the angering happens if the trivializing asceticism occurs. sent2: the fact that if the censusing does not occur and/or the theming cottonmouth happens then the knitting pyxidium happens is not wrong. sent3: the microscopicness happens if the adenoidness happens. sent4: that the mainness occurs and/or the coating plaster is triggered by that the rascality does not occur. sent5: the knitting debenture occurs. sent6: the fact that the trivializing deployment happens if the fact that the census does not occur and/or the theming cottonmouth occurs is not correct is true. sent7: the fact that either the germiness does not occur or the theming dysphoria occurs or both is wrong. sent8: the revitalizing happens. sent9: if the trivializing deployment happens the fact that the trivializing asceticism happens is right. sent10: that either the coating ovulation does not occur or the carvel-builtness happens or both does not hold. sent11: the compassionateness occurs. sent12: if the trivializing deployment does not occur that the theming mud does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the censusing does not occur and/or the theming cottonmouth occurs.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the knitting pyxidium occurs hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the knitting pyxidium does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the census does not occur and/or the theming cottonmouth happens is not correct.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that the trivializing deployment happens is true.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the trivializing asceticism happens.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the angering happens.; int6 -> int7: either the theming Swinburne happens or the angering happens or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__