if the networking canton happens the slaloming happens.
sent1: if the outshouting synchrotron does not occur and the nonproprietariness does not occur then the slaloming occurs. sent2: if the nonproprietariness happens and the networking canton does not occur then the fact that the diamagneticness does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the outshouting fixedness occurs the thermohydrometricness happens and the outshouting RNA does not occur. sent4: that the gratifying occurs is not incorrect. sent5: if the clitoridectomy does not occur the finance happens and the gratifying occurs. sent6: that the example occurs is prevented by that the thermohydrometricness happens and the outshouting RNA does not occur. sent7: the sedimenting Seattle does not occur and the Germanness does not occur. sent8: the networking canton does not occur if both the clitoridectomy and the nonproprietariness happens. sent9: the outshouting canton happens. sent10: the outshouting fixedness and the teaching hornpipe happens. sent11: the frivoling occurs if the minister happens and the livingness happens. sent12: the outshouting synchrotron does not occur and the caravanning does not occur if the example does not occur. sent13: the thermohydrometricness happens. sent14: both the gratifying and the clitoridectomy occurs.
sent14 -> int1: the clitoridectomy occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonproprietariness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the clitoridectomy and the nonproprietariness happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the networking canton does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the networking canton occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the nonproprietariness does not occur.; sent10 -> int6: the outshouting fixedness occurs.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the thermohydrometricness occurs and the outshouting RNA does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the example does not occur.; sent12 & int8 -> int9: the outshouting synchrotron does not occur and the caravanning does not occur.; int9 -> int10: the outshouting synchrotron does not occur.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the outshouting synchrotron does not occur and the nonproprietariness does not occur.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the fact that the slaloming happens is not wrong.; [assump2] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the diamagneticness occurs and the finance occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the networking canton happens the slaloming happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the outshouting synchrotron does not occur and the nonproprietariness does not occur then the slaloming occurs. sent2: if the nonproprietariness happens and the networking canton does not occur then the fact that the diamagneticness does not occur does not hold. sent3: if the outshouting fixedness occurs the thermohydrometricness happens and the outshouting RNA does not occur. sent4: that the gratifying occurs is not incorrect. sent5: if the clitoridectomy does not occur the finance happens and the gratifying occurs. sent6: that the example occurs is prevented by that the thermohydrometricness happens and the outshouting RNA does not occur. sent7: the sedimenting Seattle does not occur and the Germanness does not occur. sent8: the networking canton does not occur if both the clitoridectomy and the nonproprietariness happens. sent9: the outshouting canton happens. sent10: the outshouting fixedness and the teaching hornpipe happens. sent11: the frivoling occurs if the minister happens and the livingness happens. sent12: the outshouting synchrotron does not occur and the caravanning does not occur if the example does not occur. sent13: the thermohydrometricness happens. sent14: both the gratifying and the clitoridectomy occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the clitoridectomy occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonproprietariness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the clitoridectomy and the nonproprietariness happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the networking canton does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the networking canton occurs.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the nonproprietariness does not occur.; sent10 -> int6: the outshouting fixedness occurs.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the thermohydrometricness occurs and the outshouting RNA does not occur.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the example does not occur.; sent12 & int8 -> int9: the outshouting synchrotron does not occur and the caravanning does not occur.; int9 -> int10: the outshouting synchrotron does not occur.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the outshouting synchrotron does not occur and the nonproprietariness does not occur.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the fact that the slaloming happens is not wrong.; [assump2] & int12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__