there exists something such that if it is not wifely the fact that it wires and is non-pedal does not hold.
sent1: the fact that something is impressionistic and not a carol is not true if it does not list processional. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not wifely then it is a wired and it does not pedal. sent3: if something is not wifely it is a kind of a wired and is non-pedal. sent4: if something does not mouth then that that it is a kind of a Gomphotherium and it does not refresh Evert is true is false. sent5: if something is not a kind of a parasympathetic that it is binaural and it is not starry is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is wifely that it is a wired but not a pedal does not hold. sent7: that something uses but it is not a shade is not correct if it is not a kind of a dog-eared. sent8: if the kale is wifely then the fact that it does wire and it does not pedal does not hold. sent9: the fact that the manipulator is an esquire and does not shirk does not hold if it is not a turning. sent10: that the kale is binaural but it is not a kind of a pedal is incorrect if it is not inauspicious. sent11: if the kale is not wifely it does wire and it is non-pedal. sent12: the fact that that something does wire and it is a pedal is not right if it is not wifely is not incorrect. sent13: there is something such that if that it is non-wifely is not false the fact that it is a wired and pedal does not hold. sent14: if the interferometer does not dump downstage then that it is a good and it is not pedal is wrong. sent15: the fact that the kale is a wired and it is not non-pedal is false if it is not wifely. sent16: if something is not a kind of a predation the fact that it refreshes mummery and it does not refresh mincer is not right. sent17: if something is wifely then the fact that it does wire and it is not a kind of a pedal is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not wifely the fact that it wires and is non-pedal does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is impressionistic and not a carol is not true if it does not list processional. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not wifely then it is a wired and it does not pedal. sent3: if something is not wifely it is a kind of a wired and is non-pedal. sent4: if something does not mouth then that that it is a kind of a Gomphotherium and it does not refresh Evert is true is false. sent5: if something is not a kind of a parasympathetic that it is binaural and it is not starry is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is wifely that it is a wired but not a pedal does not hold. sent7: that something uses but it is not a shade is not correct if it is not a kind of a dog-eared. sent8: if the kale is wifely then the fact that it does wire and it does not pedal does not hold. sent9: the fact that the manipulator is an esquire and does not shirk does not hold if it is not a turning. sent10: that the kale is binaural but it is not a kind of a pedal is incorrect if it is not inauspicious. sent11: if the kale is not wifely it does wire and it is non-pedal. sent12: the fact that that something does wire and it is a pedal is not right if it is not wifely is not incorrect. sent13: there is something such that if that it is non-wifely is not false the fact that it is a wired and pedal does not hold. sent14: if the interferometer does not dump downstage then that it is a good and it is not pedal is wrong. sent15: the fact that the kale is a wired and it is not non-pedal is false if it is not wifely. sent16: if something is not a kind of a predation the fact that it refreshes mummery and it does not refresh mincer is not right. sent17: if something is wifely then the fact that it does wire and it is not a kind of a pedal is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__