the fact that the teamwork does not occur but the cryocautery happens is not incorrect.
sent1: the cirrostratus occurs. sent2: if the impairing malacologist does not occur the fact that the HRT occurs and the cirrostratus happens is not right. sent3: if the boxing midshipman happens then the surrendering happens. sent4: the deploring myeloma occurs if the fact that the extinguishableness does not occur is not false. sent5: not the impairing malacologist but the impairing BJS occurs if the basking enumeration occurs. sent6: the teamwork and the cryocautery happens if the cirrostratus does not occur. sent7: the fact that the telefilm occurs and/or the basking Whitman does not occur is not correct if the HRT occurs. sent8: the storminess happens if the callithumpianness does not occur and the boxing urodele does not occur. sent9: the nilpotentness occurs. sent10: that the callithumpianness occurs and the boxing urodele occurs results in that the teamwork does not occur. sent11: the cryocautery occurs. sent12: both the storminess and the callithumpianness occurs if the sentimentalising does not occur. sent13: the fact that the non-storminess and the basking Whitman happens is not right if the callithumpianness does not occur. sent14: if the inauspiciousness does not occur then the sugariness happens. sent15: if the basking Whitman does not occur then the telefilm does not occur. sent16: the storminess happens. sent17: the HRT happens. sent18: the boxing urodele happens if the cirrostratus happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sentimentalising occurs.; sent7 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that the telefilm happens and/or the basking Whitman does not occur does not hold.; sent18 & sent1 -> int2: the boxing urodele happens.;
the apianness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the teamwork does not occur but the cryocautery happens is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the cirrostratus occurs. sent2: if the impairing malacologist does not occur the fact that the HRT occurs and the cirrostratus happens is not right. sent3: if the boxing midshipman happens then the surrendering happens. sent4: the deploring myeloma occurs if the fact that the extinguishableness does not occur is not false. sent5: not the impairing malacologist but the impairing BJS occurs if the basking enumeration occurs. sent6: the teamwork and the cryocautery happens if the cirrostratus does not occur. sent7: the fact that the telefilm occurs and/or the basking Whitman does not occur is not correct if the HRT occurs. sent8: the storminess happens if the callithumpianness does not occur and the boxing urodele does not occur. sent9: the nilpotentness occurs. sent10: that the callithumpianness occurs and the boxing urodele occurs results in that the teamwork does not occur. sent11: the cryocautery occurs. sent12: both the storminess and the callithumpianness occurs if the sentimentalising does not occur. sent13: the fact that the non-storminess and the basking Whitman happens is not right if the callithumpianness does not occur. sent14: if the inauspiciousness does not occur then the sugariness happens. sent15: if the basking Whitman does not occur then the telefilm does not occur. sent16: the storminess happens. sent17: the HRT happens. sent18: the boxing urodele happens if the cirrostratus happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sentimentalising occurs.; sent7 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that the telefilm happens and/or the basking Whitman does not occur does not hold.; sent18 & sent1 -> int2: the boxing urodele happens.; __UNKNOWN__