the retriever is a kind of a concussion.
sent1: the retriever is not sexagesimal if the laterite does not demineralize holothurian. sent2: there exists something such that it is not photic. sent3: if something is photic it is a kind of a concussion and is not a kind of a formulary. sent4: if there is something such that it is not sexagesimal the fact that the life-of-man is not a concussion and it does not demineralize holothurian does not hold. sent5: something does demineralize railroading but it is not photic if it is formulary. sent6: the retriever fabricates throat but it does not demineralize Fothergilla. sent7: if something is not non-formulary then it is not photic. sent8: the Fothergilla does not demineralize blackfly but it does demineralize holothurian. sent9: the fact that if something is sexagesimal then it is a concussion that does not demineralize railroading is right. sent10: if something that does demineralize railroading is not photic then the laterite does not demineralize holothurian. sent11: something demineralizes railroading and is photic. sent12: the retriever is a concussion but it is not sexagesimal if it is photic. sent13: if the fact that the proportion is sexagesimal but it is not a Bulawayo does not hold that the birefringence is not sexagesimal is not false. sent14: that the proportion is sexagesimal but it is not a Bulawayo is not correct. sent15: the Daphne is a formulary. sent16: there is something such that that it demineralizes railroading hold. sent17: the Daphne is not photic and is a concussion. sent18: if something that is a formulary is not a concussion then the retriever does not demineralize holothurian. sent19: if something is not sexagesimal or it is not a Yemen or both it is not sexagesimal. sent20: if the Daphne is non-sexagesimal the retriever does not demineralize railroading. sent21: if the Daphne is a formulary it is not photic. sent22: the fact that something does demineralize holothurian and is not formulary is incorrect if it is not sexagesimal. sent23: the fact that the retriever is not sexagesimal but it is a concussion does not hold. sent24: the Daphne is not photic.
sent5 -> int1: if the Daphne is a formulary it does demineralize railroading and is not photic.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the Daphne does demineralize railroading and is not photic.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it does demineralize railroading and it is not photic.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the laterite does not demineralize holothurian.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the retriever is not sexagesimal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retriever is a concussion.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the retriever is non-sexagesimal thing that is a kind of a concussion.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the retriever is a concussion.
sent22 -> int8: the fact that the laterite does demineralize holothurian and is not a formulary is not true if it is not sexagesimal.; sent19 -> int9: if the laterite is not sexagesimal and/or it is not a Yemen then it is not sexagesimal.;
$hypothesis$ = the retriever is a kind of a concussion. ; $context$ = sent1: the retriever is not sexagesimal if the laterite does not demineralize holothurian. sent2: there exists something such that it is not photic. sent3: if something is photic it is a kind of a concussion and is not a kind of a formulary. sent4: if there is something such that it is not sexagesimal the fact that the life-of-man is not a concussion and it does not demineralize holothurian does not hold. sent5: something does demineralize railroading but it is not photic if it is formulary. sent6: the retriever fabricates throat but it does not demineralize Fothergilla. sent7: if something is not non-formulary then it is not photic. sent8: the Fothergilla does not demineralize blackfly but it does demineralize holothurian. sent9: the fact that if something is sexagesimal then it is a concussion that does not demineralize railroading is right. sent10: if something that does demineralize railroading is not photic then the laterite does not demineralize holothurian. sent11: something demineralizes railroading and is photic. sent12: the retriever is a concussion but it is not sexagesimal if it is photic. sent13: if the fact that the proportion is sexagesimal but it is not a Bulawayo does not hold that the birefringence is not sexagesimal is not false. sent14: that the proportion is sexagesimal but it is not a Bulawayo is not correct. sent15: the Daphne is a formulary. sent16: there is something such that that it demineralizes railroading hold. sent17: the Daphne is not photic and is a concussion. sent18: if something that is a formulary is not a concussion then the retriever does not demineralize holothurian. sent19: if something is not sexagesimal or it is not a Yemen or both it is not sexagesimal. sent20: if the Daphne is non-sexagesimal the retriever does not demineralize railroading. sent21: if the Daphne is a formulary it is not photic. sent22: the fact that something does demineralize holothurian and is not formulary is incorrect if it is not sexagesimal. sent23: the fact that the retriever is not sexagesimal but it is a concussion does not hold. sent24: the Daphne is not photic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the Daphne is a formulary it does demineralize railroading and is not photic.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the Daphne does demineralize railroading and is not photic.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it does demineralize railroading and it is not photic.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the laterite does not demineralize holothurian.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the retriever is not sexagesimal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retriever is a concussion.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the retriever is non-sexagesimal thing that is a kind of a concussion.; int6 & sent23 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__