that the helpmate is a kind of unalterable thing that masks kneel is incorrect.
sent1: the tapenade judders if the gumbo-limbo does not judders but it is a supplementation. sent2: the overhang tyrannizes quadric. sent3: the helpmate is a Sirach. sent4: the timbale is unalterable. sent5: if the helpmate is a kind of a Sirach then it masks kneel. sent6: that something is not short-order and is defiant does not hold if it is eschatological. sent7: the fact that the Piper is both not eschatological and not congruous is false. sent8: the overhang does mask kneel. sent9: if the fact that the tapenade is not immobile and is not spousal is wrong the mannitol is not a hunter-gatherer. sent10: if the overhang is a will the helpmate is unalterable. sent11: if something judders the fact that it is not common is not false. sent12: if something is diclinous then it does not judder and it is a supplementation. sent13: the overhang is a will. sent14: that something is unalterable and does mask kneel is wrong if it is not a will. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not short-order and it is defiant is incorrect then that the gumbo-limbo is diclinous is not wrong. sent16: the sailboat tyrannizes Piper and is unalterable. sent17: if the fact that the Piper is both not eschatological and not congruous does not hold then it is eschatological. sent18: the overhang is a kind of a Sirach and it is a Khaya if the mannitol is not a hunter-gatherer. sent19: the nard is unalterable. sent20: if something is not common the fact that it is not immobile and it is non-spousal is not right. sent21: if the helpmate is a will the overhang is unalterable. sent22: the helpmate is a kind of a pademelon. sent23: the overhang is a Oujda.
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the helpmate is unalterable is true.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the helpmate masks kneel.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the helpmate is unalterable and it masks kneel is incorrect.
sent14 -> int3: that the helpmate is unalterable thing that masks kneel is not true if it is not a will.; sent20 -> int4: if the fact that the tapenade is not common hold the fact that it is non-immobile and non-spousal does not hold.; sent11 -> int5: the tapenade is not common if it judders.; sent12 -> int6: if the gumbo-limbo is diclinous it does not judder and it is a supplementation.; sent6 -> int7: that the Piper is not short-order but defiant is not right if it is eschatological.; sent17 & sent7 -> int8: the Piper is eschatological.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the Piper is a kind of non-short-order thing that is defiant is wrong.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is not short-order and it is defiant does not hold.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the gumbo-limbo is diclinous.; int6 & int11 -> int12: the gumbo-limbo does not judder but it is a kind of a supplementation.; sent1 & int12 -> int13: that the tapenade does judder is correct.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the tapenade is not common.; int4 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the tapenade is both not immobile and not spousal is incorrect.; sent9 & int15 -> int16: that the mannitol is not a kind of a hunter-gatherer is not wrong.; sent18 & int16 -> int17: the overhang is a kind of a Sirach and it is a Khaya.; int17 -> int18: the overhang is a kind of a Sirach.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Sirach.;
$hypothesis$ = that the helpmate is a kind of unalterable thing that masks kneel is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the tapenade judders if the gumbo-limbo does not judders but it is a supplementation. sent2: the overhang tyrannizes quadric. sent3: the helpmate is a Sirach. sent4: the timbale is unalterable. sent5: if the helpmate is a kind of a Sirach then it masks kneel. sent6: that something is not short-order and is defiant does not hold if it is eschatological. sent7: the fact that the Piper is both not eschatological and not congruous is false. sent8: the overhang does mask kneel. sent9: if the fact that the tapenade is not immobile and is not spousal is wrong the mannitol is not a hunter-gatherer. sent10: if the overhang is a will the helpmate is unalterable. sent11: if something judders the fact that it is not common is not false. sent12: if something is diclinous then it does not judder and it is a supplementation. sent13: the overhang is a will. sent14: that something is unalterable and does mask kneel is wrong if it is not a will. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not short-order and it is defiant is incorrect then that the gumbo-limbo is diclinous is not wrong. sent16: the sailboat tyrannizes Piper and is unalterable. sent17: if the fact that the Piper is both not eschatological and not congruous does not hold then it is eschatological. sent18: the overhang is a kind of a Sirach and it is a Khaya if the mannitol is not a hunter-gatherer. sent19: the nard is unalterable. sent20: if something is not common the fact that it is not immobile and it is non-spousal is not right. sent21: if the helpmate is a will the overhang is unalterable. sent22: the helpmate is a kind of a pademelon. sent23: the overhang is a Oujda. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the helpmate is unalterable is true.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the helpmate masks kneel.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__