the coastguardsman is not a liqueur.
sent1: if the coastguardsman is not a kind of a liqueur the fact that the soymilk does dissociate neatness and it is a kind of a refresher is false. sent2: if that something does not dissociate neatness and is a refresher is not true then it is not a kind of a paraphrase. sent3: if the Levantine is a kind of a SC the fact that the laundry is a kind of a SC hold. sent4: that the Levantine is a kind of a SC and/or is a kind of a Anouilh is true. sent5: if something is not a Anouilh that it is both a sibilation and a SC does not hold. sent6: if something does dissociate neatness then the fact that it is not a paraphrase is true. sent7: the soymilk is triclinic. sent8: if the laundry is not a SC the soymilk is a paraphrase. sent9: that the laundry is not a SC is correct if the Levantine is a SC. sent10: the fact that the soymilk does not dissociate neatness but it is a refresher is wrong if the coastguardsman is not a kind of a liqueur. sent11: the laundry is not a kind of a SC if the Levantine is a Anouilh. sent12: the coastguardsman is a Anouilh if the Levantine is a liqueur. sent13: the coastguardsman is not a liqueur if the fact that it is a paraphrase and it is a SC is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coastguardsman is not a liqueur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that the soymilk does not dissociate neatness but it is a kind of a refresher does not hold is not wrong.; sent2 -> int2: if that the soymilk does not dissociate neatness and is a refresher is not true it is not a paraphrase.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the soymilk is not a paraphrase.; sent4 & sent9 & sent11 -> int4: the laundry is not a kind of a SC.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the soymilk is a kind of a paraphrase.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the coastguardsman is not a liqueur.
sent5 -> int7: the fact that the Levantine is a kind of a sibilation and it is a kind of a SC does not hold if it is not a Anouilh.;
$hypothesis$ = the coastguardsman is not a liqueur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the coastguardsman is not a kind of a liqueur the fact that the soymilk does dissociate neatness and it is a kind of a refresher is false. sent2: if that something does not dissociate neatness and is a refresher is not true then it is not a kind of a paraphrase. sent3: if the Levantine is a kind of a SC the fact that the laundry is a kind of a SC hold. sent4: that the Levantine is a kind of a SC and/or is a kind of a Anouilh is true. sent5: if something is not a Anouilh that it is both a sibilation and a SC does not hold. sent6: if something does dissociate neatness then the fact that it is not a paraphrase is true. sent7: the soymilk is triclinic. sent8: if the laundry is not a SC the soymilk is a paraphrase. sent9: that the laundry is not a SC is correct if the Levantine is a SC. sent10: the fact that the soymilk does not dissociate neatness but it is a refresher is wrong if the coastguardsman is not a kind of a liqueur. sent11: the laundry is not a kind of a SC if the Levantine is a Anouilh. sent12: the coastguardsman is a Anouilh if the Levantine is a liqueur. sent13: the coastguardsman is not a liqueur if the fact that it is a paraphrase and it is a SC is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coastguardsman is not a liqueur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that the soymilk does not dissociate neatness but it is a kind of a refresher does not hold is not wrong.; sent2 -> int2: if that the soymilk does not dissociate neatness and is a refresher is not true it is not a paraphrase.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the soymilk is not a paraphrase.; sent4 & sent9 & sent11 -> int4: the laundry is not a kind of a SC.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the soymilk is a kind of a paraphrase.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__