there is something such that if that it is not a taxidermist and it is glandular is not correct then it is not monovalent.
sent1: that something does nag columbo if that it is not a tisane and does nag remark is not correct is not incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is both not a taxidermist and glandular is wrong then it is monovalent. sent3: if that something is not a Sweet and is a shandygaff is false then it is not a kind of a flick. sent4: if that the azurite is not a willingness but it is a bohemian is not true it does not bead. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a tisane it is not summery. sent6: if that the azurite is not a taxidermist and is glandular is not right then it is monovalent. sent7: that there exists something such that if it is both not a taxidermist and glandular it is not monovalent hold. sent8: the generalissimo is not a consumptive if it is not a Markov and it is monovalent. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a taxidermist then it is not monovalent. sent10: something is not a galea if that it is non-prodromal and it is stative does not hold. sent11: if something is both not a taxidermist and glandular it is not monovalent. sent12: the volumeter is not a kind of an eelgrass if the fact that it is a kind of non-monovalent thing that does nag dipped is not right. sent13: the fact that the azurite is not monovalent if that the azurite is non-glandular is right is correct. sent14: the azurite is not monovalent if that it does not chomp generalissimo and does affiliate is not correct. sent15: the azurite is not tame if that it is not a taxidermist and it is uneventful does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a Hegira it is not a kind of a gadfly. sent17: the azurite is not monovalent if that it is a kind of a taxidermist and it is glandular is incorrect. sent18: if that something does not affiliate but it is rectosigmoid does not hold then it is not lawful. sent19: there exists something such that if it is non-supersonic it does not repent chromoplast. sent20: something is pediatric if that it does not close and it is cervine is not true.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not a taxidermist and it is glandular is not correct then it is not monovalent. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does nag columbo if that it is not a tisane and does nag remark is not correct is not incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is both not a taxidermist and glandular is wrong then it is monovalent. sent3: if that something is not a Sweet and is a shandygaff is false then it is not a kind of a flick. sent4: if that the azurite is not a willingness but it is a bohemian is not true it does not bead. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a tisane it is not summery. sent6: if that the azurite is not a taxidermist and is glandular is not right then it is monovalent. sent7: that there exists something such that if it is both not a taxidermist and glandular it is not monovalent hold. sent8: the generalissimo is not a consumptive if it is not a Markov and it is monovalent. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a taxidermist then it is not monovalent. sent10: something is not a galea if that it is non-prodromal and it is stative does not hold. sent11: if something is both not a taxidermist and glandular it is not monovalent. sent12: the volumeter is not a kind of an eelgrass if the fact that it is a kind of non-monovalent thing that does nag dipped is not right. sent13: the fact that the azurite is not monovalent if that the azurite is non-glandular is right is correct. sent14: the azurite is not monovalent if that it does not chomp generalissimo and does affiliate is not correct. sent15: the azurite is not tame if that it is not a taxidermist and it is uneventful does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a Hegira it is not a kind of a gadfly. sent17: the azurite is not monovalent if that it is a kind of a taxidermist and it is glandular is incorrect. sent18: if that something does not affiliate but it is rectosigmoid does not hold then it is not lawful. sent19: there exists something such that if it is non-supersonic it does not repent chromoplast. sent20: something is pediatric if that it does not close and it is cervine is not true. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__