the feedback is non-metastable.
sent1: the fructose does not geminate effeminacy if the locust is not a blameworthiness and does geminate effeminacy. sent2: the petter does geminate effeminacy. sent3: if the petter geminates effeminacy that it does geminate sainthood is not incorrect. sent4: if the locust is a kind of a flexion the feedback is metastable. sent5: The effeminacy does geminate petter. sent6: the locust is a flexion if it is Aleutian and does not geminate puzzle. sent7: the petter does not geminate sainthood if the locust does geminate puzzle. sent8: if the fact that the locust is Aleutian but it does not geminate puzzle does not hold the fact that the petter does not geminate sainthood hold. sent9: something is not a flexion but it geminates puzzle if it does geminate sainthood.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the locust is Aleutian but it does not geminate puzzle is not correct.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the petter does not geminate sainthood.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: that the petter does not geminate sainthood is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the locust is a kind of Aleutian thing that does not geminate puzzle.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the locust is a flexion is right.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fructose geminates puzzle.
sent9 -> int6: if the fructose does geminate sainthood the fact that it is not a kind of a flexion and does geminate puzzle is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the feedback is non-metastable. ; $context$ = sent1: the fructose does not geminate effeminacy if the locust is not a blameworthiness and does geminate effeminacy. sent2: the petter does geminate effeminacy. sent3: if the petter geminates effeminacy that it does geminate sainthood is not incorrect. sent4: if the locust is a kind of a flexion the feedback is metastable. sent5: The effeminacy does geminate petter. sent6: the locust is a flexion if it is Aleutian and does not geminate puzzle. sent7: the petter does not geminate sainthood if the locust does geminate puzzle. sent8: if the fact that the locust is Aleutian but it does not geminate puzzle does not hold the fact that the petter does not geminate sainthood hold. sent9: something is not a flexion but it geminates puzzle if it does geminate sainthood. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the locust is Aleutian but it does not geminate puzzle is not correct.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the petter does not geminate sainthood.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: that the petter does not geminate sainthood is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the locust is a kind of Aleutian thing that does not geminate puzzle.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the locust is a flexion is right.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__