there exists something such that it is not a Aglaia.
sent1: the hazelnut is non-subclavian if the phycobilin is not a sleep and is a Fremont. sent2: the phycobilin is not a sleep and is a Fremont if the springboard is a kind of a pollinator. sent3: the springboard is a kind of a pollinator. sent4: the fact that the bodywork is not a Aglaia is not incorrect if it does not gauge viatication. sent5: if the hazelnut is not subclavian that the bodywork is not subclavian but vice-presidential does not hold. sent6: something does not gauge viatication if that that it is a kind of non-subclavian thing that is vice-presidential is not wrong does not hold.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the phycobilin is not a sleep but it is a kind of a Fremont.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the hazelnut is not subclavian.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the bodywork is not subclavian but it is vice-presidential does not hold.; sent6 -> int4: if that the bodywork is not subclavian but it is vice-presidential is wrong it does not gauge viatication.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bodywork does not gauge viatication.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the bodywork is a kind of a Aglaia is incorrect.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is not a Aglaia. ; $context$ = sent1: the hazelnut is non-subclavian if the phycobilin is not a sleep and is a Fremont. sent2: the phycobilin is not a sleep and is a Fremont if the springboard is a kind of a pollinator. sent3: the springboard is a kind of a pollinator. sent4: the fact that the bodywork is not a Aglaia is not incorrect if it does not gauge viatication. sent5: if the hazelnut is not subclavian that the bodywork is not subclavian but vice-presidential does not hold. sent6: something does not gauge viatication if that that it is a kind of non-subclavian thing that is vice-presidential is not wrong does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the phycobilin is not a sleep but it is a kind of a Fremont.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the hazelnut is not subclavian.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the bodywork is not subclavian but it is vice-presidential does not hold.; sent6 -> int4: if that the bodywork is not subclavian but it is vice-presidential is wrong it does not gauge viatication.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bodywork does not gauge viatication.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the bodywork is a kind of a Aglaia is incorrect.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__