the littering occurs.
sent1: the basking whacking does not occur and the prepositionalness does not occur. sent2: that if the basking whacking happens then the fact that the boxing rentier occurs but the waggery does not occur is wrong hold. sent3: that the prepositionalness does not occur if the fact that the anamnesticness does not occur and the deploring link does not occur does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: the litter does not occur if not the basking whacking but the boxing rentier occurs. sent5: the boxing rentier and the waggery occurs. sent6: the impairing Citlaltepetl does not occur if the fact that the impairing Citlaltepetl but not the composition occurs is incorrect. sent7: the prepositionalness does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the boxing rentier occurs but the waggery does not occur does not hold that the self-aggrandizement does not occur is correct. sent9: if the ESM occurs that the impairing Citlaltepetl occurs but the composition does not occur is not true. sent10: if the frizzling happens then that the anamnesticness does not occur and the deploring link does not occur is wrong. sent11: that the impairing Citlaltepetl does not occur triggers that the frizzling but not the deploring coiffeuse happens.
sent5 -> int1: the boxing rentier occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the basking whacking does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the basking whacking does not occur but the boxing rentier happens.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the self-aggrandizement does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the littering occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the basking whacking does not occur and the prepositionalness does not occur. sent2: that if the basking whacking happens then the fact that the boxing rentier occurs but the waggery does not occur is wrong hold. sent3: that the prepositionalness does not occur if the fact that the anamnesticness does not occur and the deploring link does not occur does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: the litter does not occur if not the basking whacking but the boxing rentier occurs. sent5: the boxing rentier and the waggery occurs. sent6: the impairing Citlaltepetl does not occur if the fact that the impairing Citlaltepetl but not the composition occurs is incorrect. sent7: the prepositionalness does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the boxing rentier occurs but the waggery does not occur does not hold that the self-aggrandizement does not occur is correct. sent9: if the ESM occurs that the impairing Citlaltepetl occurs but the composition does not occur is not true. sent10: if the frizzling happens then that the anamnesticness does not occur and the deploring link does not occur is wrong. sent11: that the impairing Citlaltepetl does not occur triggers that the frizzling but not the deploring coiffeuse happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the boxing rentier occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the basking whacking does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the basking whacking does not occur but the boxing rentier happens.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__