the dextrin is a tapotement.
sent1: the dextrin is not praetorian if there is something such that the fact that it is praetorian and it is a crook does not hold. sent2: if the nomad is non-autoecious and is a kind of a hypoglossal then the dextrin is a tapotement. sent3: there exists something such that it disjoins. sent4: if the nomad does wear Adam then it does crook. sent5: there is something such that that it does not disjoin and/or striates is wrong. sent6: if the fact that the tyramine is not a kind of a Waite and does not rabbet triclinium is not right the nomad does rabbet triclinium. sent7: the stingray is not autoecious. sent8: the tyramine is a hypoglossal. sent9: the fact that the egomaniac is bucolic and it is a Farragut is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the tyramine is praetorian and it is a kind of a crook is not true if the stingray does not wear Adam. sent11: either something does not disjoin or it does not striate or both. sent12: if the nomad is not editorial then it is not autoecious and it is a hypoglossal. sent13: the nomad is not autoecious if it is not editorial. sent14: that the tyramine is not a Waite and rabbets triclinium is incorrect. sent15: the fact that if the nomad is autoecious and is a hypoglossal the fact that the dextrin is a tapotement is true is right. sent16: something does not rabbet triclinium if it is editorial and a crook. sent17: there is something such that that it does not disjoin and/or it does not striate is not correct. sent18: the nomad is not autoecious. sent19: something that is praetorian wears Adam. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it disjoins and/or it is not striate does not hold the fact that the nomad is praetorian is not incorrect. sent21: the fact that the tyramine is not a Waite and does not rabbet triclinium is false. sent22: if the tyramine rabbets triclinium then the nomad rabbets triclinium. sent23: if the stingray is not autoecious then it is not editorial or it does not rabbet triclinium or both.
sent19 -> int1: that the nomad does wear Adam if the fact that the nomad is praetorian is not false hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nomad is editorial.; sent16 -> int2: the nomad does not rabbet triclinium if it is a kind of editorial thing that is a crook.; sent6 & sent21 -> int3: the nomad does rabbet triclinium.;
there exists something such that that it is not hatless and/or it is not euphonic is false.
sent23 & sent7 -> int4: either the stingray is not editorial or it does not rabbet triclinium or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the dextrin is a tapotement. ; $context$ = sent1: the dextrin is not praetorian if there is something such that the fact that it is praetorian and it is a crook does not hold. sent2: if the nomad is non-autoecious and is a kind of a hypoglossal then the dextrin is a tapotement. sent3: there exists something such that it disjoins. sent4: if the nomad does wear Adam then it does crook. sent5: there is something such that that it does not disjoin and/or striates is wrong. sent6: if the fact that the tyramine is not a kind of a Waite and does not rabbet triclinium is not right the nomad does rabbet triclinium. sent7: the stingray is not autoecious. sent8: the tyramine is a hypoglossal. sent9: the fact that the egomaniac is bucolic and it is a Farragut is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the tyramine is praetorian and it is a kind of a crook is not true if the stingray does not wear Adam. sent11: either something does not disjoin or it does not striate or both. sent12: if the nomad is not editorial then it is not autoecious and it is a hypoglossal. sent13: the nomad is not autoecious if it is not editorial. sent14: that the tyramine is not a Waite and rabbets triclinium is incorrect. sent15: the fact that if the nomad is autoecious and is a hypoglossal the fact that the dextrin is a tapotement is true is right. sent16: something does not rabbet triclinium if it is editorial and a crook. sent17: there is something such that that it does not disjoin and/or it does not striate is not correct. sent18: the nomad is not autoecious. sent19: something that is praetorian wears Adam. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it disjoins and/or it is not striate does not hold the fact that the nomad is praetorian is not incorrect. sent21: the fact that the tyramine is not a Waite and does not rabbet triclinium is false. sent22: if the tyramine rabbets triclinium then the nomad rabbets triclinium. sent23: if the stingray is not autoecious then it is not editorial or it does not rabbet triclinium or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: that the nomad does wear Adam if the fact that the nomad is praetorian is not false hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nomad is editorial.; sent16 -> int2: the nomad does not rabbet triclinium if it is a kind of editorial thing that is a crook.; sent6 & sent21 -> int3: the nomad does rabbet triclinium.; __UNKNOWN__