if the fact that the cleats is rhetorical or it waves or both is wrong the fritter is not a kind of an amperage.
sent1: the fritter does not overboil. sent2: if something that is a paratrooper is not a kind of an amperage then it is not a boast. sent3: the fritter does not boast and/or is a paratrooper if the fact that the cleats is not a paratrooper hold. sent4: if the cleats is a kind of a coast then the terbinafine is a dumper. sent5: something that is not a boast is not an amperage. sent6: the fritter boasts and/or it is a paratrooper. sent7: the fact that the cleats does not wave is not wrong. sent8: something permits monster if it is a dumper. sent9: if the cleats is rhetorical and/or it is a wave then the fritter is not a kind of an amperage. sent10: the cleats is not a kind of an amperage. sent11: the cleats is not an amperage and/or is a paratrooper if the fritter is not a kind of a paratrooper. sent12: if the fact that either the cleats is rhetorical or it waves or both is incorrect the fact that it is not a paratrooper is not incorrect. sent13: something does not permit cooked if it does not interpolate Gdansk or it permits thill or both. sent14: if something permits monster then it is a kind of a paratrooper that is not an amperage. sent15: the cleats is not rhetorical. sent16: if that the cleats is a kind of a paratrooper or is a kind of a boast or both is not true then the fritter is not an amperage. sent17: if that the fritter is a kind of a boast is not correct then it is not a kind of an amperage. sent18: the fritter does boast or is a kind of a paratrooper or both if the cleats is not a paratrooper. sent19: the cleats is not a paratrooper if it is rhetorical and/or is a wave. sent20: that the frijole thwarts and/or it is a henroost does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cleats is rhetorical or it waves or both is not correct.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the cleats is not a paratrooper.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fritter is not a boast and/or it is a paratrooper.;
the terbinafine is not a kind of a boast.
sent2 -> int3: if the terbinafine is a kind of a paratrooper but it is not a kind of an amperage it is not a boast.; sent14 -> int4: the terbinafine is a paratrooper but it is not an amperage if it permits monster.; sent8 -> int5: if the terbinafine is a dumper it permits monster.;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the cleats is rhetorical or it waves or both is wrong the fritter is not a kind of an amperage. ; $context$ = sent1: the fritter does not overboil. sent2: if something that is a paratrooper is not a kind of an amperage then it is not a boast. sent3: the fritter does not boast and/or is a paratrooper if the fact that the cleats is not a paratrooper hold. sent4: if the cleats is a kind of a coast then the terbinafine is a dumper. sent5: something that is not a boast is not an amperage. sent6: the fritter boasts and/or it is a paratrooper. sent7: the fact that the cleats does not wave is not wrong. sent8: something permits monster if it is a dumper. sent9: if the cleats is rhetorical and/or it is a wave then the fritter is not a kind of an amperage. sent10: the cleats is not a kind of an amperage. sent11: the cleats is not an amperage and/or is a paratrooper if the fritter is not a kind of a paratrooper. sent12: if the fact that either the cleats is rhetorical or it waves or both is incorrect the fact that it is not a paratrooper is not incorrect. sent13: something does not permit cooked if it does not interpolate Gdansk or it permits thill or both. sent14: if something permits monster then it is a kind of a paratrooper that is not an amperage. sent15: the cleats is not rhetorical. sent16: if that the cleats is a kind of a paratrooper or is a kind of a boast or both is not true then the fritter is not an amperage. sent17: if that the fritter is a kind of a boast is not correct then it is not a kind of an amperage. sent18: the fritter does boast or is a kind of a paratrooper or both if the cleats is not a paratrooper. sent19: the cleats is not a paratrooper if it is rhetorical and/or is a wave. sent20: that the frijole thwarts and/or it is a henroost does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cleats is rhetorical or it waves or both is not correct.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the cleats is not a paratrooper.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fritter is not a boast and/or it is a paratrooper.; __UNKNOWN__