the aversiveness prevents the subsidence.
sent1: the revising tom-tom happens if the revising parcellation happens. sent2: the trigonometricness occurs. sent3: that the aversiveness occurs leads to that the subsidence happens. sent4: if the aversiveness occurs then that not the revising parcellation but the Jurassic occurs is not right. sent5: the undesirableness does not occur if the patrolling analyst does not occur and the departmentalness does not occur. sent6: the patrolling analyst does not occur. sent7: not the trim but the revising goldmine occurs. sent8: the subsidence does not occur if that not the undesirableness but the protestation happens hold. sent9: the revising midway occurs. sent10: the microsomalness occurs. sent11: that the unicameralness does not occur is correct if the frivoling does not occur and the thaw occurs. sent12: that the fascista does not occur but the sterilization occurs hold. sent13: the fact that the objectiveness happens and the slighting links occurs is not correct. sent14: the drunkenness happens. sent15: that the revising Mondrian does not occur but the pyroelectricity occurs is not correct if the hydrodynamicsness occurs. sent16: the revising tom-tom happens if the fact that the fact that the revising parcellation does not occur and the Jurassic happens is false is correct. sent17: the arrogance occurs. sent18: the allantoicness does not occur. sent19: the cryogenicness occurs. sent20: that not the targeting but the cytoarchitecturalness occurs triggers that the meshing does not occur. sent21: the protestation happens. sent22: the fact that the bulldoging does not occur but the obstetricness occurs is not true. sent23: the patrolling puree does not occur and the bulldoging does not occur. sent24: that the retractileness does not occur but the karma happens prevents that the windstorm does not occur. sent25: the mechanism occurs if not the patrolling magic but the carinalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aversiveness occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the revising parcellation does not occur but the Jurassic happens is not correct.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the revising tom-tom happens.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the revising tom-tom and the arrogance occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the aversiveness prevents the subsidence. ; $context$ = sent1: the revising tom-tom happens if the revising parcellation happens. sent2: the trigonometricness occurs. sent3: that the aversiveness occurs leads to that the subsidence happens. sent4: if the aversiveness occurs then that not the revising parcellation but the Jurassic occurs is not right. sent5: the undesirableness does not occur if the patrolling analyst does not occur and the departmentalness does not occur. sent6: the patrolling analyst does not occur. sent7: not the trim but the revising goldmine occurs. sent8: the subsidence does not occur if that not the undesirableness but the protestation happens hold. sent9: the revising midway occurs. sent10: the microsomalness occurs. sent11: that the unicameralness does not occur is correct if the frivoling does not occur and the thaw occurs. sent12: that the fascista does not occur but the sterilization occurs hold. sent13: the fact that the objectiveness happens and the slighting links occurs is not correct. sent14: the drunkenness happens. sent15: that the revising Mondrian does not occur but the pyroelectricity occurs is not correct if the hydrodynamicsness occurs. sent16: the revising tom-tom happens if the fact that the fact that the revising parcellation does not occur and the Jurassic happens is false is correct. sent17: the arrogance occurs. sent18: the allantoicness does not occur. sent19: the cryogenicness occurs. sent20: that not the targeting but the cytoarchitecturalness occurs triggers that the meshing does not occur. sent21: the protestation happens. sent22: the fact that the bulldoging does not occur but the obstetricness occurs is not true. sent23: the patrolling puree does not occur and the bulldoging does not occur. sent24: that the retractileness does not occur but the karma happens prevents that the windstorm does not occur. sent25: the mechanism occurs if not the patrolling magic but the carinalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aversiveness occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the revising parcellation does not occur but the Jurassic happens is not correct.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the revising tom-tom happens.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the revising tom-tom and the arrogance occurs.; __UNKNOWN__