that if the caramelizing occurs then the maglev occurs and the cartage does not occur is false.
sent1: the maglev happens and the cartage happens if the caramelizing occurs. sent2: that the maglev happens and the cartage does not occur is caused by the non-implicitness. sent3: the arbitralness does not occur. sent4: that both the non-onomasticness and the non-lengthwiseness occurs yields that the implicitness does not occur. sent5: the caramelizing does not occur if the fact that the presidency occurs is not incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the loyalness does not occur is not false the fictionalization does not occur and the sorting does not occur. sent7: the maglev occurs if the caramelizing happens. sent8: if that the presidency does not occur is not false then the onomasticness does not occur. sent9: if the noninvasiveness does not occur then both the autofluorescence and the mumble occurs. sent10: both the non-onomasticness and the non-lengthwiseness occurs if the presidency does not occur. sent11: that the mystifying Filoviridae happens but the reunion does not occur hold. sent12: the frustration does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the caramelizing happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the presidency occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the caramelizing does not occur.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the presidency does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: both the non-onomasticness and the non-lengthwiseness occurs.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the implicitness does not occur.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the maglev happens and the cartage does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the caramelizing occurs then the maglev occurs and the cartage does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the maglev happens and the cartage happens if the caramelizing occurs. sent2: that the maglev happens and the cartage does not occur is caused by the non-implicitness. sent3: the arbitralness does not occur. sent4: that both the non-onomasticness and the non-lengthwiseness occurs yields that the implicitness does not occur. sent5: the caramelizing does not occur if the fact that the presidency occurs is not incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the loyalness does not occur is not false the fictionalization does not occur and the sorting does not occur. sent7: the maglev occurs if the caramelizing happens. sent8: if that the presidency does not occur is not false then the onomasticness does not occur. sent9: if the noninvasiveness does not occur then both the autofluorescence and the mumble occurs. sent10: both the non-onomasticness and the non-lengthwiseness occurs if the presidency does not occur. sent11: that the mystifying Filoviridae happens but the reunion does not occur hold. sent12: the frustration does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the caramelizing happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the presidency occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the caramelizing does not occur.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the presidency does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: both the non-onomasticness and the non-lengthwiseness occurs.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the implicitness does not occur.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the maglev happens and the cartage does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__