the waking first does not occur.
sent1: if the autosomalness happens the thaw does not occur and the fomentation does not occur. sent2: the witch-hunt occurs. sent3: the carrotiness occurs if the fact that the laryngismus occurs but the cirrocumulus does not occur is false. sent4: that the carrotiness does not occur and the lob does not occur is triggered by that the witch-hunt occurs. sent5: if that the witch-hunt occurs is not wrong the lobbing does not occur. sent6: if the inflectionalness does not occur the fact that the waking Invar happens and the pyrography does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the denial happens the fact that the pealing does not occur is true. sent8: that both the laryngismus and the cirrocumulus happens is not correct. sent9: the non-carrotyness is prevented by the cirrocumulus. sent10: if the knowableness happens then the autosomalness occurs. sent11: the explication occurs. sent12: if that the fomentation does not occur is right then that the laryngismus but not the cirrocumulus happens does not hold. sent13: the autosomalness does not occur if the thaw happens. sent14: if the knowableness does not occur the waking first occurs. sent15: the factor happens if the fact that the neonatalness but not the birth occurs is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the knowableness occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the autosomalness happens is not wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the thaw does not occur and the fomentation does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the fomentation does not occur.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the laryngismus but not the cirrocumulus occurs is wrong.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the carrotiness occurs.; sent4 & sent2 -> int6: the carrotiness does not occur and the lobbing does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the carrotiness does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the knowableness does not occur.; int9 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the waking first does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the waking first does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the autosomalness happens the thaw does not occur and the fomentation does not occur. sent2: the witch-hunt occurs. sent3: the carrotiness occurs if the fact that the laryngismus occurs but the cirrocumulus does not occur is false. sent4: that the carrotiness does not occur and the lob does not occur is triggered by that the witch-hunt occurs. sent5: if that the witch-hunt occurs is not wrong the lobbing does not occur. sent6: if the inflectionalness does not occur the fact that the waking Invar happens and the pyrography does not occur does not hold. sent7: if the denial happens the fact that the pealing does not occur is true. sent8: that both the laryngismus and the cirrocumulus happens is not correct. sent9: the non-carrotyness is prevented by the cirrocumulus. sent10: if the knowableness happens then the autosomalness occurs. sent11: the explication occurs. sent12: if that the fomentation does not occur is right then that the laryngismus but not the cirrocumulus happens does not hold. sent13: the autosomalness does not occur if the thaw happens. sent14: if the knowableness does not occur the waking first occurs. sent15: the factor happens if the fact that the neonatalness but not the birth occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the knowableness occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the autosomalness happens is not wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the thaw does not occur and the fomentation does not occur.; int2 -> int3: the fomentation does not occur.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the laryngismus but not the cirrocumulus occurs is wrong.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the carrotiness occurs.; sent4 & sent2 -> int6: the carrotiness does not occur and the lobbing does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the carrotiness does not occur.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the knowableness does not occur.; int9 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__