that the funiculus is not undesirous but it is not noncaloric is not correct.
sent1: if the cigarfish does bear paleontologist then the funiculus is desirous. sent2: the cigarfish outshouts limbus. sent3: if the inflorescence does not even Rankin or it does bear paleontologist or both it is desirous. sent4: the inflorescence does even Rankin or it does bear paleontologist or both if the cigarfish does not bear paleontologist. sent5: The limbus outshouts cigarfish. sent6: if the cigarfish does not bear paleontologist either the inflorescence does not even Rankin or it bear paleontologist or both. sent7: the cigarfish is unlivable. sent8: if the inflorescence is desirous then the fact that the funiculus is desirous but not noncaloric is false. sent9: if an unlivable thing outshouts limbus then it does not bear paleontologist.
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the cigarfish is unlivable and it does outshout limbus.; sent9 -> int2: the cigarfish does not bear paleontologist if it is unlivable and outshouts limbus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cigarfish does not bear paleontologist.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the inflorescence does not even Rankin and/or bears paleontologist.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the inflorescence is desirous.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the funiculus is desirous and is not noncaloric.
$hypothesis$ = that the funiculus is not undesirous but it is not noncaloric is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cigarfish does bear paleontologist then the funiculus is desirous. sent2: the cigarfish outshouts limbus. sent3: if the inflorescence does not even Rankin or it does bear paleontologist or both it is desirous. sent4: the inflorescence does even Rankin or it does bear paleontologist or both if the cigarfish does not bear paleontologist. sent5: The limbus outshouts cigarfish. sent6: if the cigarfish does not bear paleontologist either the inflorescence does not even Rankin or it bear paleontologist or both. sent7: the cigarfish is unlivable. sent8: if the inflorescence is desirous then the fact that the funiculus is desirous but not noncaloric is false. sent9: if an unlivable thing outshouts limbus then it does not bear paleontologist. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the cigarfish is unlivable and it does outshout limbus.; sent9 -> int2: the cigarfish does not bear paleontologist if it is unlivable and outshouts limbus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cigarfish does not bear paleontologist.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the inflorescence does not even Rankin and/or bears paleontologist.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the inflorescence is desirous.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__