the foolishness does not occur if the splatting expensiveness occurs.
sent1: the snuff happens. sent2: the thaw does not occur if the proudness happens. sent3: the pupillariness happens. sent4: the suffocation does not occur. sent5: if the competition does not occur and the strut does not occur then the Calvary does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the repossession does not occur and the splatting peridotite does not occur is incorrect then the strut does not occur. sent7: the blackbird happens. sent8: the plagiarism does not occur. sent9: the perviousness does not occur. sent10: that the competition does not occur is caused by that the splatting expensiveness and the foolishness occurs. sent11: the fact that the repossession but not the splatting peridotite occurs is false. sent12: the strut does not occur if the repossession occurs. sent13: that the spitball does not occur is correct. sent14: if the perviousness does not occur both the fragmenting thunderstorm and the pupillariness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the splatting expensiveness happens and the semioticsness does not occur is not true then the semioticsness happens. sent16: if the fragmenting thunderstorm occurs then the Calvary happens. sent17: that the instrumentalness occurs and the splatting Landsteiner happens is caused by that the transcendentalness does not occur. sent18: that the outflanking single-mindedness happens is not false. sent19: the exodus happens. sent20: the foolishness is triggered by the splatting expensiveness. sent21: that the repossession does not occur and the splatting peridotite does not occur is not true. sent22: the imperviousness triggers that the pupillariness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the splatting expensiveness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the foolishness happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: both the splatting expensiveness and the foolishness occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the competition does not occur.; sent6 & sent21 -> int3: the strut does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the competition does not occur and the strut does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Calvary does not occur.; sent14 & sent9 -> int6: both the fragmenting thunderstorm and the pupillariness happens.; int6 -> int7: the fragmenting thunderstorm occurs.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the Calvary occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int9 -> int10: the foolishness does not occur.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the semioticsness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the foolishness does not occur if the splatting expensiveness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the snuff happens. sent2: the thaw does not occur if the proudness happens. sent3: the pupillariness happens. sent4: the suffocation does not occur. sent5: if the competition does not occur and the strut does not occur then the Calvary does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the repossession does not occur and the splatting peridotite does not occur is incorrect then the strut does not occur. sent7: the blackbird happens. sent8: the plagiarism does not occur. sent9: the perviousness does not occur. sent10: that the competition does not occur is caused by that the splatting expensiveness and the foolishness occurs. sent11: the fact that the repossession but not the splatting peridotite occurs is false. sent12: the strut does not occur if the repossession occurs. sent13: that the spitball does not occur is correct. sent14: if the perviousness does not occur both the fragmenting thunderstorm and the pupillariness occurs. sent15: if the fact that the splatting expensiveness happens and the semioticsness does not occur is not true then the semioticsness happens. sent16: if the fragmenting thunderstorm occurs then the Calvary happens. sent17: that the instrumentalness occurs and the splatting Landsteiner happens is caused by that the transcendentalness does not occur. sent18: that the outflanking single-mindedness happens is not false. sent19: the exodus happens. sent20: the foolishness is triggered by the splatting expensiveness. sent21: that the repossession does not occur and the splatting peridotite does not occur is not true. sent22: the imperviousness triggers that the pupillariness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the splatting expensiveness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the foolishness happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: both the splatting expensiveness and the foolishness occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the competition does not occur.; sent6 & sent21 -> int3: the strut does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the competition does not occur and the strut does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Calvary does not occur.; sent14 & sent9 -> int6: both the fragmenting thunderstorm and the pupillariness happens.; int6 -> int7: the fragmenting thunderstorm occurs.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the Calvary occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int9 -> int10: the foolishness does not occur.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__