the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does kennel link and it does not scorch cynicism does not hold then it does squire certification is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is laryngopharyngeal it is incredulous. sent2: there is something such that if that it does squire thrift and is not reversible does not hold that it is forceful is not false. sent3: if the fact that something is a Namoi but it does not kennel stint is not correct then it scorches ombudsman. sent4: if the fact that the airbrake does kennel link and does not scorch cynicism does not hold then the fact that it squires certification is not incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if it is diabatic then it scorches astronomer. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a harmonium that is not impatient then it is particulate. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a nonconformity and is not a harmonium does not hold then it does kennel plating hold. sent8: if that the airbrake does kennel link and does scorch cynicism is not true then it squires certification. sent9: there is something such that if that it is teratogenic and does not squire heaver is wrong then it is a waiter. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Namoi hold it kennels airbrake. sent11: the airbrake is a kind of a reversible if the fact that it is Cornish and does not squire certification is incorrect.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Namoi and it does not kennel stint does not hold it does scorch ombudsman.
sent3 -> int1: if the fact that the Mass is a Namoi and does not kennel stint is not true it scorches ombudsman.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does kennel link and it does not scorch cynicism does not hold then it does squire certification is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is laryngopharyngeal it is incredulous. sent2: there is something such that if that it does squire thrift and is not reversible does not hold that it is forceful is not false. sent3: if the fact that something is a Namoi but it does not kennel stint is not correct then it scorches ombudsman. sent4: if the fact that the airbrake does kennel link and does not scorch cynicism does not hold then the fact that it squires certification is not incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if it is diabatic then it scorches astronomer. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a harmonium that is not impatient then it is particulate. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a nonconformity and is not a harmonium does not hold then it does kennel plating hold. sent8: if that the airbrake does kennel link and does scorch cynicism is not true then it squires certification. sent9: there is something such that if that it is teratogenic and does not squire heaver is wrong then it is a waiter. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Namoi hold it kennels airbrake. sent11: the airbrake is a kind of a reversible if the fact that it is Cornish and does not squire certification is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__