the re-entrantness or the valentness or both happens.
sent1: that the electrochemicalness does not occur and/or the re-entrantness does not occur results in the re-entrantnessness. sent2: if the fact that the worthlessness does not occur hold that the sheathing perishability does not occur is not false. sent3: if the disintegrativeness occurs then the fact that both the non-low-tensionness and the non-nidifugousness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the sheathing perishability does not occur then the fact that the intrusiveness happens but the pageant does not occur is false. sent5: if the valentness does not occur either the electrochemicalness does not occur or the re-entrantness does not occur or both. sent6: that the intrusiveness but not the pageant happens is false. sent7: the sheathing perishability occurs if the worthlessness does not occur. sent8: the disintegrativeness occurs or the worthlessness does not occur or both. sent9: the sheathing perishability does not occur if the disintegrativeness occurs. sent10: if the monoeciousness occurs that the electrochemicalness does not occur and the rupture does not occur is false. sent11: the re-entrantness happens if the intrusiveness occurs. sent12: the referring vengeance does not occur if the transferring Frisbee occurs. sent13: the intrusiveness does not occur if that the electrochemicalness does not occur and the rupture does not occur is not right. sent14: the referring gendarme occurs. sent15: if that the disintegrativeness does not occur is not incorrect then that either the re-entrantness occurs or the valentness occurs or both does not hold. sent16: that the intrusiveness does not occur and the pageant does not occur is wrong if the sheathing perishability does not occur. sent17: the fact that the re-entrantness occurs is not false if the fact that the intrusiveness does not occur and the pageant does not occur is false.
sent8 & sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the sheathing perishability does not occur.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the intrusiveness does not occur and the pageant does not occur is not correct.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the re-entrantness occurs.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the re-entrantness and/or the valentness occurs is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the re-entrantness or the valentness or both happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the electrochemicalness does not occur and/or the re-entrantness does not occur results in the re-entrantnessness. sent2: if the fact that the worthlessness does not occur hold that the sheathing perishability does not occur is not false. sent3: if the disintegrativeness occurs then the fact that both the non-low-tensionness and the non-nidifugousness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the sheathing perishability does not occur then the fact that the intrusiveness happens but the pageant does not occur is false. sent5: if the valentness does not occur either the electrochemicalness does not occur or the re-entrantness does not occur or both. sent6: that the intrusiveness but not the pageant happens is false. sent7: the sheathing perishability occurs if the worthlessness does not occur. sent8: the disintegrativeness occurs or the worthlessness does not occur or both. sent9: the sheathing perishability does not occur if the disintegrativeness occurs. sent10: if the monoeciousness occurs that the electrochemicalness does not occur and the rupture does not occur is false. sent11: the re-entrantness happens if the intrusiveness occurs. sent12: the referring vengeance does not occur if the transferring Frisbee occurs. sent13: the intrusiveness does not occur if that the electrochemicalness does not occur and the rupture does not occur is not right. sent14: the referring gendarme occurs. sent15: if that the disintegrativeness does not occur is not incorrect then that either the re-entrantness occurs or the valentness occurs or both does not hold. sent16: that the intrusiveness does not occur and the pageant does not occur is wrong if the sheathing perishability does not occur. sent17: the fact that the re-entrantness occurs is not false if the fact that the intrusiveness does not occur and the pageant does not occur is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the sheathing perishability does not occur.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the intrusiveness does not occur and the pageant does not occur is not correct.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the re-entrantness occurs.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__