the millerite is complex.
sent1: the jackhammer is a kind of a complex. sent2: the millerite is a kind of a pledge. sent3: the millerite does perpetuate Decapterus. sent4: that the matzo is not a kind of a complex is correct. sent5: the jackhammer is not an ovary. sent6: that the millerite is declarative if the millerite is a complex is not incorrect. sent7: if something is an ovary it is not corpuscular. sent8: the jackhammer does not perpetuate delight. sent9: the agua is not non-complex. sent10: if the jackhammer does not pledge and does not perpetuate slop the millerite is non-complex. sent11: if the bubbler is not a foreperson then it is corpuscular and it twins. sent12: the Spandau pledges. sent13: if something is a pledge it is declarative. sent14: the matzo does not pledge if it is a snore. sent15: if the matzo is not corpuscular it is a snore and it is a kind of an ovary. sent16: if the jackhammer is not a pledge then the matzo perpetuates slop. sent17: something does not shaft aviation if it is trihydroxy. sent18: if the fact that something does perpetuate slop is not wrong it is not an ovary. sent19: the matzo is not corpuscular.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the jackhammer is not a pledge is not incorrect.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the matzo perpetuates slop.; sent18 -> int2: if the matzo does perpetuate slop then it is not an ovary.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the matzo is not an ovary.; sent15 & sent19 -> int4: the matzo snores and is an ovary.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the matzo is a kind of an ovary hold.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the jackhammer is a pledge.; sent13 -> int8: if the jackhammer does pledge it is declarative.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the jackhammer is declarative.;
the millerite is not a complex.
$hypothesis$ = the millerite is complex. ; $context$ = sent1: the jackhammer is a kind of a complex. sent2: the millerite is a kind of a pledge. sent3: the millerite does perpetuate Decapterus. sent4: that the matzo is not a kind of a complex is correct. sent5: the jackhammer is not an ovary. sent6: that the millerite is declarative if the millerite is a complex is not incorrect. sent7: if something is an ovary it is not corpuscular. sent8: the jackhammer does not perpetuate delight. sent9: the agua is not non-complex. sent10: if the jackhammer does not pledge and does not perpetuate slop the millerite is non-complex. sent11: if the bubbler is not a foreperson then it is corpuscular and it twins. sent12: the Spandau pledges. sent13: if something is a pledge it is declarative. sent14: the matzo does not pledge if it is a snore. sent15: if the matzo is not corpuscular it is a snore and it is a kind of an ovary. sent16: if the jackhammer is not a pledge then the matzo perpetuates slop. sent17: something does not shaft aviation if it is trihydroxy. sent18: if the fact that something does perpetuate slop is not wrong it is not an ovary. sent19: the matzo is not corpuscular. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the jackhammer is not a pledge is not incorrect.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the matzo perpetuates slop.; sent18 -> int2: if the matzo does perpetuate slop then it is not an ovary.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the matzo is not an ovary.; sent15 & sent19 -> int4: the matzo snores and is an ovary.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the matzo is a kind of an ovary hold.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the jackhammer is a pledge.; sent13 -> int8: if the jackhammer does pledge it is declarative.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the jackhammer is declarative.; __UNKNOWN__