the exponent is not tentacular.
sent1: the fact that the exponent is non-tentacular thing that is not Minoan is false. sent2: the bastnasite is a sonneteer if that it does fit brightness and it does not fit hot-rod does not hold. sent3: if something is a Mesmer then it is tentacular. sent4: that the aperitif is a seventeen that is not tractable is not correct. sent5: that the kasbah does fit hot-rod and is not unpretentious is not correct. sent6: if the bastnasite is a sonneteer then the aperitif is not a adsorption and it is not a kind of a seventeen. sent7: that the bastnasite is a kind of a flag but it is not harmless does not hold. sent8: something is not harmless. sent9: the fact that the exponent does not gape and it is not mecopterous is right. sent10: if something that is not a sonneteer does not fit hot-rod the bastnasite is a adsorption. sent11: if something that is not tentacular does not fit hot-rod the bastnasite is a kind of a adsorption. sent12: the exponent is a kind of a Mesmer if something is not a kind of a adsorption and is not a kind of a seventeen. sent13: that the aperitif is not a kind of a Minoan and is not a seventeen is not correct. sent14: that something is a Minoan but it is not a flag is incorrect if it fits brightness. sent15: if the fact that that the bastnasite is not a flag and it is not harmless is not right is not false then that it is Minoan is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the bastnasite is not a flag and not harmless is not correct. sent17: if the Catalan is not macrobiotics then it is a kind of a seventeen that is a Mesmer. sent18: there is something such that it is not a Leptodactylus and does fit imaging. sent19: if the aperitif does not fit brightness the fact that the bastnasite is a kind of a Minoan and/or it does fit hot-rod does not hold. sent20: the fact that the aperitif does not fit brightness hold if that the Catalan is a kind of a sonneteer but it is not a adsorption is not right. sent21: there is something such that it fits hot-rod and does not flag. sent22: that something does fit brightness and does not fit hot-rod does not hold if it is a Minoan.
sent15 & sent16 -> int1: the bastnasite is a Minoan.; sent22 -> int2: the fact that the bastnasite fits brightness and does not fit hot-rod is incorrect if it is a kind of a Minoan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the bastnasite fits brightness and does not fit hot-rod does not hold.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the bastnasite is a sonneteer hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the aperitif is not a kind of a adsorption and it is not a seventeen.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a adsorption and it is not a seventeen.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the exponent is a kind of a Mesmer.; sent3 -> int8: if the exponent is a Mesmer then it is tentacular.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the exponent is not tentacular.
$hypothesis$ = the exponent is not tentacular. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the exponent is non-tentacular thing that is not Minoan is false. sent2: the bastnasite is a sonneteer if that it does fit brightness and it does not fit hot-rod does not hold. sent3: if something is a Mesmer then it is tentacular. sent4: that the aperitif is a seventeen that is not tractable is not correct. sent5: that the kasbah does fit hot-rod and is not unpretentious is not correct. sent6: if the bastnasite is a sonneteer then the aperitif is not a adsorption and it is not a kind of a seventeen. sent7: that the bastnasite is a kind of a flag but it is not harmless does not hold. sent8: something is not harmless. sent9: the fact that the exponent does not gape and it is not mecopterous is right. sent10: if something that is not a sonneteer does not fit hot-rod the bastnasite is a adsorption. sent11: if something that is not tentacular does not fit hot-rod the bastnasite is a kind of a adsorption. sent12: the exponent is a kind of a Mesmer if something is not a kind of a adsorption and is not a kind of a seventeen. sent13: that the aperitif is not a kind of a Minoan and is not a seventeen is not correct. sent14: that something is a Minoan but it is not a flag is incorrect if it fits brightness. sent15: if the fact that that the bastnasite is not a flag and it is not harmless is not right is not false then that it is Minoan is not incorrect. sent16: the fact that the bastnasite is not a flag and not harmless is not correct. sent17: if the Catalan is not macrobiotics then it is a kind of a seventeen that is a Mesmer. sent18: there is something such that it is not a Leptodactylus and does fit imaging. sent19: if the aperitif does not fit brightness the fact that the bastnasite is a kind of a Minoan and/or it does fit hot-rod does not hold. sent20: the fact that the aperitif does not fit brightness hold if that the Catalan is a kind of a sonneteer but it is not a adsorption is not right. sent21: there is something such that it fits hot-rod and does not flag. sent22: that something does fit brightness and does not fit hot-rod does not hold if it is a Minoan. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent16 -> int1: the bastnasite is a Minoan.; sent22 -> int2: the fact that the bastnasite fits brightness and does not fit hot-rod is incorrect if it is a kind of a Minoan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the bastnasite fits brightness and does not fit hot-rod does not hold.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the bastnasite is a sonneteer hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the aperitif is not a kind of a adsorption and it is not a seventeen.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a adsorption and it is not a seventeen.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the exponent is a kind of a Mesmer.; sent3 -> int8: if the exponent is a Mesmer then it is tentacular.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__