the hope is a antiparticle.
sent1: something is not a antiparticle if it is a compression that does not scram deodorant. sent2: the hope is a kind of a tetrachlorethylene if that it is a kind of a counterglow that does not alternate is false. sent3: the fact that the hope is a counterglow and it is alternate does not hold if the shingle is resistive. sent4: if the hope is a kind of a tetrachlorethylene then it is a antiparticle. sent5: if the hope does alternate then it is a tetrachlorethylene. sent6: the fact that the hope is a counterglow that does alternate is not true. sent7: the fact that the Pompadour is a kind of a compression and it is quartzose does not hold. sent8: something does scram deodorant. sent9: if something is a kind of a antiparticle then the fact that the Pompadour is not quartzose but it is a tetrachlorethylene does not hold. sent10: that the Pompadour is not a compression and is quartzose is not correct if there is something such that it does scram deodorant. sent11: the shingle is resistive if that the Pompadour is not a compression and is quartzose is not true. sent12: the fact that the Pompadour is a compression and is quartzose does not hold if there is something such that it scrams deodorant. sent13: if the Pompadour scrams deodorant then the bushbuck is a kind of a compression. sent14: something is a compression and does not scram deodorant if it is not quartzose. sent15: if the shingle is quartzose and is not resistive the Pompadour is quartzose.
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the Pompadour is not a compression but it is quartzose does not hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the shingle is resistive.;
the bushbuck is a compression.
$hypothesis$ = the hope is a antiparticle. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a antiparticle if it is a compression that does not scram deodorant. sent2: the hope is a kind of a tetrachlorethylene if that it is a kind of a counterglow that does not alternate is false. sent3: the fact that the hope is a counterglow and it is alternate does not hold if the shingle is resistive. sent4: if the hope is a kind of a tetrachlorethylene then it is a antiparticle. sent5: if the hope does alternate then it is a tetrachlorethylene. sent6: the fact that the hope is a counterglow that does alternate is not true. sent7: the fact that the Pompadour is a kind of a compression and it is quartzose does not hold. sent8: something does scram deodorant. sent9: if something is a kind of a antiparticle then the fact that the Pompadour is not quartzose but it is a tetrachlorethylene does not hold. sent10: that the Pompadour is not a compression and is quartzose is not correct if there is something such that it does scram deodorant. sent11: the shingle is resistive if that the Pompadour is not a compression and is quartzose is not true. sent12: the fact that the Pompadour is a compression and is quartzose does not hold if there is something such that it scrams deodorant. sent13: if the Pompadour scrams deodorant then the bushbuck is a kind of a compression. sent14: something is a compression and does not scram deodorant if it is not quartzose. sent15: if the shingle is quartzose and is not resistive the Pompadour is quartzose. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the Pompadour is not a compression but it is quartzose does not hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the shingle is resistive.; __UNKNOWN__