if the subtilizing audacity happens and the subtilizing seeded does not occur the respite occurs.
sent1: that either the Piagetianness occurs or the subtilizing Alexandrian occurs or both results in that the tonalness does not occur. sent2: that the concluding does not occur causes that the entericness and the rhizotomy happens. sent3: the capitularness happens if the subtilizing audacity occurs and the subtilizing seeded does not occur. sent4: that not the stranding associability but the splat happens prevents that the lamentation does not occur. sent5: the harshness does not occur. sent6: the reducing does not occur. sent7: that the non-Piagetianness and the non-esotericness happens is right if the fact that the laziness occurs hold. sent8: both the rhizotomy and the snapping occurs. sent9: the festooning nutrition happens. sent10: that not the concatenation but the capitularness occurs is not true if the fact that the cacodylicness happens is right. sent11: the laziness occurs. sent12: the fact that the killing does not occur hold. sent13: that both the concluding and the subtilizing grissino happens is triggered by that the tonalness does not occur. sent14: the concatenation occurs if the fact that not the concatenation but the capitularness occurs is false. sent15: if both the non-cacodylicness and the concluding occurs the respite happens. sent16: the Piagetianness or the subtilizing Alexandrian or both happens. sent17: the heliacalness happens but the subtilizing table does not occur. sent18: the snapping happens if that the tonalness does not occur and the subtilizing grissino does not occur is wrong. sent19: the cacodylicness does not occur if the capitularness and the rhizotomy occurs. sent20: if the Piagetianness does not occur that that the tonalness does not occur and the subtilizing grissino does not occur is not false does not hold. sent21: that the subtilizing sawdust does not occur is prevented by that both the festooning villainy and the stranding golem happens. sent22: the non-painfulness is prevented by that the dissipating occurs and the wandering occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subtilizing audacity but not the subtilizing seeded happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the capitularness occurs.; sent8 -> int2: the rhizotomy happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the capitularness happens and the rhizotomy happens.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the cacodylicness does not occur.; sent1 & sent16 -> int5: the tonalness does not occur.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the concluding happens and the subtilizing grissino happens.; int6 -> int7: the concluding occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the non-cacodylicness and the concluding happens.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the respite occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
both the entericness and the concatenation occurs.
sent7 & sent11 -> int10: the Piagetianness does not occur and the esotericness does not occur.; int10 -> int11: the Piagetianness does not occur.; sent20 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the tonalness does not occur and the subtilizing grissino does not occur does not hold.; sent18 & int12 -> int13: the snap occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = if the subtilizing audacity happens and the subtilizing seeded does not occur the respite occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that either the Piagetianness occurs or the subtilizing Alexandrian occurs or both results in that the tonalness does not occur. sent2: that the concluding does not occur causes that the entericness and the rhizotomy happens. sent3: the capitularness happens if the subtilizing audacity occurs and the subtilizing seeded does not occur. sent4: that not the stranding associability but the splat happens prevents that the lamentation does not occur. sent5: the harshness does not occur. sent6: the reducing does not occur. sent7: that the non-Piagetianness and the non-esotericness happens is right if the fact that the laziness occurs hold. sent8: both the rhizotomy and the snapping occurs. sent9: the festooning nutrition happens. sent10: that not the concatenation but the capitularness occurs is not true if the fact that the cacodylicness happens is right. sent11: the laziness occurs. sent12: the fact that the killing does not occur hold. sent13: that both the concluding and the subtilizing grissino happens is triggered by that the tonalness does not occur. sent14: the concatenation occurs if the fact that not the concatenation but the capitularness occurs is false. sent15: if both the non-cacodylicness and the concluding occurs the respite happens. sent16: the Piagetianness or the subtilizing Alexandrian or both happens. sent17: the heliacalness happens but the subtilizing table does not occur. sent18: the snapping happens if that the tonalness does not occur and the subtilizing grissino does not occur is wrong. sent19: the cacodylicness does not occur if the capitularness and the rhizotomy occurs. sent20: if the Piagetianness does not occur that that the tonalness does not occur and the subtilizing grissino does not occur is not false does not hold. sent21: that the subtilizing sawdust does not occur is prevented by that both the festooning villainy and the stranding golem happens. sent22: the non-painfulness is prevented by that the dissipating occurs and the wandering occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subtilizing audacity but not the subtilizing seeded happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the capitularness occurs.; sent8 -> int2: the rhizotomy happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the capitularness happens and the rhizotomy happens.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the cacodylicness does not occur.; sent1 & sent16 -> int5: the tonalness does not occur.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the concluding happens and the subtilizing grissino happens.; int6 -> int7: the concluding occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the non-cacodylicness and the concluding happens.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the respite occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__