the thysanopter is antiphonary.
sent1: if that that the stipule is a kind of a fractal but it does not launch cobalt is not wrong is wrong it does not dismiss. sent2: the fact that the stipule is a fractal and does not launch cobalt does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is acidic then the thysanopter is not a antiphonary. sent4: if there is something such that it is not a kind of an earldom or is acidic or both then the fact that the thysanopter is not antiphonary is true. sent5: something either is not a kind of an earldom or is acidic or both if it does not dismiss.
sent5 -> int1: if the stipule does not dismiss either it is not an earldom or it is acidic or both.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: that the stipule does not dismiss is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stipule is not an earldom or not non-acidic or both.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an earldom and/or it is acidic.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the thysanopter is antiphonary. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that the stipule is a kind of a fractal but it does not launch cobalt is not wrong is wrong it does not dismiss. sent2: the fact that the stipule is a fractal and does not launch cobalt does not hold. sent3: if there exists something such that it is acidic then the thysanopter is not a antiphonary. sent4: if there is something such that it is not a kind of an earldom or is acidic or both then the fact that the thysanopter is not antiphonary is true. sent5: something either is not a kind of an earldom or is acidic or both if it does not dismiss. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the stipule does not dismiss either it is not an earldom or it is acidic or both.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: that the stipule does not dismiss is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stipule is not an earldom or not non-acidic or both.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of an earldom and/or it is acidic.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__