the fact that the Goldsmith is not Coleridgian or is not a piezoelectricity or both is not wrong.
sent1: The hotdog does excrete Goldsmith. sent2: that the prod is both nonpsychoactive and an hour is not correct if it does not excrete hotdog. sent3: that something is inheritable and not pyrotechnics does not hold if it is not a kind of an hour. sent4: if the Goldsmith is not an hour that it does sample pinnacle and does not excrete boar is not true. sent5: if a nonpsychoactive thing does excrete hotdog then it is not Coleridgian. sent6: the Goldsmith samples pinnacle and does not excrete boar. sent7: if something does not excrete hotdog then it is an hour and it is nonpsychoactive. sent8: the Goldsmith does excrete hotdog. sent9: that if something is a kind of an hour it is nonpsychoactive hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Goldsmith is not an hour.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the Goldsmith samples pinnacle but it does not excrete boar is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Goldsmith is an hour.; sent9 -> int4: the Goldsmith is nonpsychoactive if it is an hour.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Goldsmith is nonpsychoactive.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the Goldsmith is nonpsychoactive and it excretes hotdog.; sent5 -> int7: the Goldsmith is not Coleridgian if it is nonpsychoactive and it excretes hotdog.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Goldsmith is not Coleridgian.; int8 -> hypothesis;
that the Goldsmith is either not Coleridgian or not a piezoelectricity or both does not hold.
sent7 -> int9: the ambusher is an hour and it is nonpsychoactive if it does not excrete hotdog.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Goldsmith is not Coleridgian or is not a piezoelectricity or both is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: The hotdog does excrete Goldsmith. sent2: that the prod is both nonpsychoactive and an hour is not correct if it does not excrete hotdog. sent3: that something is inheritable and not pyrotechnics does not hold if it is not a kind of an hour. sent4: if the Goldsmith is not an hour that it does sample pinnacle and does not excrete boar is not true. sent5: if a nonpsychoactive thing does excrete hotdog then it is not Coleridgian. sent6: the Goldsmith samples pinnacle and does not excrete boar. sent7: if something does not excrete hotdog then it is an hour and it is nonpsychoactive. sent8: the Goldsmith does excrete hotdog. sent9: that if something is a kind of an hour it is nonpsychoactive hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Goldsmith is not an hour.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the Goldsmith samples pinnacle but it does not excrete boar is not right.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Goldsmith is an hour.; sent9 -> int4: the Goldsmith is nonpsychoactive if it is an hour.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Goldsmith is nonpsychoactive.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the Goldsmith is nonpsychoactive and it excretes hotdog.; sent5 -> int7: the Goldsmith is not Coleridgian if it is nonpsychoactive and it excretes hotdog.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the Goldsmith is not Coleridgian.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__