the fact that the half-caste is not areal but cash-and-carry is not true.
sent1: that the half-caste is a kind of a miscount that is cash-and-carry is incorrect. sent2: that the pineapple is a kind of a prefiguration that is not resolute is not true. sent3: something is not tympanitic and/or it is not a cuneiform if it is not a kind of a miscount. sent4: that the clown is both not a miscount and cash-and-carry does not hold. sent5: the fact that the half-caste is areal and it is cash-and-carry is not true if the propulsion is not cash-and-carry. sent6: the tentorium is not areal and it is not unmown. sent7: the clown is non-cuneiform. sent8: something is not a cuneiform if it is not tympanitic or it is not cuneiform or both. sent9: that the pineapple does not miscount but it is cash-and-carry is not right. sent10: that the half-caste is not areal and is cash-and-carry is incorrect if the propulsion is not cash-and-carry. sent11: that the half-caste is areal thing that is cash-and-carry is wrong. sent12: if the fact that the pineapple is both tympanitic and a miscount does not hold the fact that the propulsion is not cash-and-carry is not incorrect. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is a prefiguration but not resolute is false then the clown inserts Salomon. sent14: if the clown is a cuneiform the half-caste is not areal but cash-and-carry. sent15: the fact that the clown is both a cuneiform and not non-cash-and-carry is incorrect if the propulsion is not non-cash-and-carry. sent16: the propulsion is not cash-and-carry if the pineapple is not tympanitic. sent17: that if the clown is not a cuneiform then that the half-caste is not areal but it is a cuneiform is not correct hold. sent18: the clown is not a cuneiform and is not tympanitic. sent19: the clown is a kind of non-cuneiform thing that is not a miscount. sent20: the fact that the pineapple is not non-tympanitic but a miscount is not correct if the clown is not a miscount.
sent19 -> int1: the clown is not a kind of a miscount.; sent20 & int1 -> int2: that that the pineapple is tympanitic and it does miscount is wrong is not wrong.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the propulsion is not cash-and-carry.; sent10 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the half-caste is not areal but it is cash-and-carry.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the half-caste is not areal but cash-and-carry is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the half-caste is a kind of a miscount that is cash-and-carry is incorrect. sent2: that the pineapple is a kind of a prefiguration that is not resolute is not true. sent3: something is not tympanitic and/or it is not a cuneiform if it is not a kind of a miscount. sent4: that the clown is both not a miscount and cash-and-carry does not hold. sent5: the fact that the half-caste is areal and it is cash-and-carry is not true if the propulsion is not cash-and-carry. sent6: the tentorium is not areal and it is not unmown. sent7: the clown is non-cuneiform. sent8: something is not a cuneiform if it is not tympanitic or it is not cuneiform or both. sent9: that the pineapple does not miscount but it is cash-and-carry is not right. sent10: that the half-caste is not areal and is cash-and-carry is incorrect if the propulsion is not cash-and-carry. sent11: that the half-caste is areal thing that is cash-and-carry is wrong. sent12: if the fact that the pineapple is both tympanitic and a miscount does not hold the fact that the propulsion is not cash-and-carry is not incorrect. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is a prefiguration but not resolute is false then the clown inserts Salomon. sent14: if the clown is a cuneiform the half-caste is not areal but cash-and-carry. sent15: the fact that the clown is both a cuneiform and not non-cash-and-carry is incorrect if the propulsion is not non-cash-and-carry. sent16: the propulsion is not cash-and-carry if the pineapple is not tympanitic. sent17: that if the clown is not a cuneiform then that the half-caste is not areal but it is a cuneiform is not correct hold. sent18: the clown is not a cuneiform and is not tympanitic. sent19: the clown is a kind of non-cuneiform thing that is not a miscount. sent20: the fact that the pineapple is not non-tympanitic but a miscount is not correct if the clown is not a miscount. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the clown is not a kind of a miscount.; sent20 & int1 -> int2: that that the pineapple is tympanitic and it does miscount is wrong is not wrong.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the propulsion is not cash-and-carry.; sent10 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__