the breadroot is thermometric but it is not a Lincoln.
sent1: that the kelp is not a Stizostedion is right. sent2: if the fact that something is not anastomotic hold then the fact that it is a kind of thermometric thing that is not a kind of a Lincoln is not correct. sent3: the breadroot is vibrionic. sent4: if something that is not a Stizostedion is a malfeasance it is unsold. sent5: the imbibition is thermometric if the kelp is thermometric. sent6: the kelp is a kind of a Picardie that is a Simpson. sent7: the imbibition is sold if the navicular is not a angioscope. sent8: the navicular is anastomotic. sent9: the breadroot is anastomotic. sent10: if the navicular is thermometric the imbibition is thermometric. sent11: something does evanesce if it does refine Messiah. sent12: if the feist is a Stizostedion then the imbibition is unsold. sent13: that the feist does not seem and is not a kind of a batten is not correct if it sedates. sent14: if the breadroot is anastomotic then it is medicolegal. sent15: the imbibition is a Lincoln. sent16: either the Valentine is anthracitic or it is a kind of a Stizostedion or both. sent17: the kelp is thermometric. sent18: something is comparable if it seems. sent19: either the feist is unsold or it is a kind of a Stizostedion or both. sent20: the fact that either something is not medicolegal or it is a angioscope or both is wrong if it is unsold. sent21: something is both not a Stizostedion and a malfeasance if it does evanesce. sent22: that either the kelp does not refine storied or it does sedate or both is false. sent23: the imbibition does seem if there is something such that the fact that it does not seem and is not a batten is not correct. sent24: the feist sedates if that either the kelp does not refine storied or it sedates or both is not correct. sent25: the feist is medicolegal if the breadroot is a kind of a Stizostedion. sent26: the imbibition is unsold if the feist is unsold. sent27: the breadroot is thermometric if that the kelp is thermometric is true.
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: the breadroot is medicolegal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the breadroot is a Lincoln.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the breadroot is a Lincoln and medicolegal.; sent19 & sent26 & sent12 -> int3: the imbibition is unsold.; sent27 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the breadroot is thermometric is right.;
the fact that the breadroot is thermometric and is not a Lincoln is not true.
sent2 -> int5: the fact that the breadroot is thermometric but it is not a kind of a Lincoln is not right if it is not anastomotic.; sent20 -> int6: that the fact that either the navicular is not medicolegal or it is a angioscope or both is not false is not true if it is unsold.; sent4 -> int7: if the navicular is both not a Stizostedion and a malfeasance then it is unsold.; sent21 -> int8: the navicular is not a Stizostedion but a malfeasance if it evanesces.; sent11 -> int9: the navicular evanesces if it does refine Messiah.; sent18 -> int10: if the fact that the imbibition does seem hold then it is comparable.; sent24 & sent22 -> int11: the feist does sedate.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: that the feist does not seem and it is not a batten is false.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it does not seem and it is not a batten is wrong.; int13 & sent23 -> int14: that the imbibition seems is right.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the imbibition is comparable.; int15 -> int16: there are comparable things.;
$hypothesis$ = the breadroot is thermometric but it is not a Lincoln. ; $context$ = sent1: that the kelp is not a Stizostedion is right. sent2: if the fact that something is not anastomotic hold then the fact that it is a kind of thermometric thing that is not a kind of a Lincoln is not correct. sent3: the breadroot is vibrionic. sent4: if something that is not a Stizostedion is a malfeasance it is unsold. sent5: the imbibition is thermometric if the kelp is thermometric. sent6: the kelp is a kind of a Picardie that is a Simpson. sent7: the imbibition is sold if the navicular is not a angioscope. sent8: the navicular is anastomotic. sent9: the breadroot is anastomotic. sent10: if the navicular is thermometric the imbibition is thermometric. sent11: something does evanesce if it does refine Messiah. sent12: if the feist is a Stizostedion then the imbibition is unsold. sent13: that the feist does not seem and is not a kind of a batten is not correct if it sedates. sent14: if the breadroot is anastomotic then it is medicolegal. sent15: the imbibition is a Lincoln. sent16: either the Valentine is anthracitic or it is a kind of a Stizostedion or both. sent17: the kelp is thermometric. sent18: something is comparable if it seems. sent19: either the feist is unsold or it is a kind of a Stizostedion or both. sent20: the fact that either something is not medicolegal or it is a angioscope or both is wrong if it is unsold. sent21: something is both not a Stizostedion and a malfeasance if it does evanesce. sent22: that either the kelp does not refine storied or it does sedate or both is false. sent23: the imbibition does seem if there is something such that the fact that it does not seem and is not a batten is not correct. sent24: the feist sedates if that either the kelp does not refine storied or it sedates or both is not correct. sent25: the feist is medicolegal if the breadroot is a kind of a Stizostedion. sent26: the imbibition is unsold if the feist is unsold. sent27: the breadroot is thermometric if that the kelp is thermometric is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: the breadroot is medicolegal.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the breadroot is a Lincoln.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the breadroot is a Lincoln and medicolegal.; sent19 & sent26 & sent12 -> int3: the imbibition is unsold.; sent27 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the breadroot is thermometric is right.; __UNKNOWN__