the fact that that that the chlorophylloseness but not the myringoplasty occurs hold is incorrect if the fact that the scorcher does not occur is not wrong is incorrect.
sent1: that the parenteralness happens prevents that the manacling bittern does not occur. sent2: the raven happens. sent3: if the manacling cockatrice does not occur the buildup occurs and the transcription occurs. sent4: that the baking does not occur is caused by that the scorcher and the hornlessness happens. sent5: the drilling happens. sent6: the steepening methanol happens but the lockout does not occur. sent7: that the rearrangement does not occur causes that both the manacling Michigan and the non-Caucasianness occurs. sent8: that the chlorophylloseness occurs but the myringoplasty does not occur is brought about by the buildup. sent9: the invigorating happens but the straight-arm does not occur. sent10: the fact that the chlorophylloseness but not the myringoplasty occurs does not hold if the hornlessness does not occur. sent11: that the manacling cockatrice does not occur is caused by that the audition but not the smack occurs. sent12: that the sublittoralness happens brings about that the steepening Danaea occurs. sent13: if the scorcher does not occur then the fact that both the chlorophylloseness and the myringoplasty occurs does not hold. sent14: if the ideal occurs then the auditioning occurs but the smack does not occur. sent15: the scorcher occurs if the hornlessness happens. sent16: that both the chlorophylloseness and the myringoplasty occurs does not hold. sent17: that the naming occurs but the provincial does not occur does not hold. sent18: if the zoning does not occur the fact that both the ebbing halogeton and the mechanisticness happens is wrong. sent19: the fact that the nonradioactiveness and the cytogeneticsness occurs is false if the buildup does not occur. sent20: the Caucasianness occurs. sent21: the heathlikeness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hornlessness happens.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the scorcher happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scorcher does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the hornlessness does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: that the chlorophylloseness happens but the myringoplasty does not occur is not correct.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the baking does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that that the chlorophylloseness but not the myringoplasty occurs hold is incorrect if the fact that the scorcher does not occur is not wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the parenteralness happens prevents that the manacling bittern does not occur. sent2: the raven happens. sent3: if the manacling cockatrice does not occur the buildup occurs and the transcription occurs. sent4: that the baking does not occur is caused by that the scorcher and the hornlessness happens. sent5: the drilling happens. sent6: the steepening methanol happens but the lockout does not occur. sent7: that the rearrangement does not occur causes that both the manacling Michigan and the non-Caucasianness occurs. sent8: that the chlorophylloseness occurs but the myringoplasty does not occur is brought about by the buildup. sent9: the invigorating happens but the straight-arm does not occur. sent10: the fact that the chlorophylloseness but not the myringoplasty occurs does not hold if the hornlessness does not occur. sent11: that the manacling cockatrice does not occur is caused by that the audition but not the smack occurs. sent12: that the sublittoralness happens brings about that the steepening Danaea occurs. sent13: if the scorcher does not occur then the fact that both the chlorophylloseness and the myringoplasty occurs does not hold. sent14: if the ideal occurs then the auditioning occurs but the smack does not occur. sent15: the scorcher occurs if the hornlessness happens. sent16: that both the chlorophylloseness and the myringoplasty occurs does not hold. sent17: that the naming occurs but the provincial does not occur does not hold. sent18: if the zoning does not occur the fact that both the ebbing halogeton and the mechanisticness happens is wrong. sent19: the fact that the nonradioactiveness and the cytogeneticsness occurs is false if the buildup does not occur. sent20: the Caucasianness occurs. sent21: the heathlikeness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hornlessness happens.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the scorcher happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scorcher does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the hornlessness does not occur.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: that the chlorophylloseness happens but the myringoplasty does not occur is not correct.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__