the normalness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the blind happens is correct. sent2: the normalness does not occur if the fact that not the decimation but the blindness occurs is not right. sent3: if the continualness does not occur the fact that the fact that the phalangealness and the inhabitancy occurs does not hold is right. sent4: the non-retrorseness prevents that the inhabitancy happens. sent5: if not the decimation but the blindness happens then the fact that the collocation occurs is not false. sent6: the phalangealness occurs. sent7: the exceeding postulant does not occur if the collocation and/or the whoopee happens. sent8: if the fact that the phalangealness happens hold that the continualness occurs but the inhabitancy does not occur is wrong. sent9: the continualness occurs and the inhabitancy does not occur if the fact that the retrorseness does not occur is not false. sent10: that the retrorseness and the exceeding postulant happens is not right if the inhabitancy does not occur. sent11: if the fact that both the phalangealness and the inhabitancy happens is false the inhabitancy does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decimation does not occur but the blinding occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the collocation occurs.; int1 -> int2: the collocation and/or the whoopee happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the exceeding postulant does not occur.; sent8 & sent6 -> int4: that the continualness occurs and the inhabitancy does not occur does not hold.;
the normalness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the normalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the blind happens is correct. sent2: the normalness does not occur if the fact that not the decimation but the blindness occurs is not right. sent3: if the continualness does not occur the fact that the fact that the phalangealness and the inhabitancy occurs does not hold is right. sent4: the non-retrorseness prevents that the inhabitancy happens. sent5: if not the decimation but the blindness happens then the fact that the collocation occurs is not false. sent6: the phalangealness occurs. sent7: the exceeding postulant does not occur if the collocation and/or the whoopee happens. sent8: if the fact that the phalangealness happens hold that the continualness occurs but the inhabitancy does not occur is wrong. sent9: the continualness occurs and the inhabitancy does not occur if the fact that the retrorseness does not occur is not false. sent10: that the retrorseness and the exceeding postulant happens is not right if the inhabitancy does not occur. sent11: if the fact that both the phalangealness and the inhabitancy happens is false the inhabitancy does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decimation does not occur but the blinding occurs.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the collocation occurs.; int1 -> int2: the collocation and/or the whoopee happens.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the exceeding postulant does not occur.; sent8 & sent6 -> int4: that the continualness occurs and the inhabitancy does not occur does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__