the woodwork is breastless.
sent1: if something that is not a blain is a kind of an exponential it is not a lancelet. sent2: the fact that if the fact that the Snow is not a blain but an exponential is not correct the woodwork is breastless hold. sent3: if that the bacchanal is not a kind of a detail but it vaticinates is false then the niece does not vaticinates. sent4: the Snow vaticinates if it yields mezzanine. sent5: the Snow yields mezzanine. sent6: The mezzanine yields Snow.
sent1 -> int1: if the Snow is not a blain and is a kind of an exponential the fact that it is not a lancelet is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Snow is not a blain but exponential.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Snow is not a lancelet.; sent4 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the Snow does vaticinate is not incorrect.;
the fact that the woodwork is not breastless is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the woodwork is breastless. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a blain is a kind of an exponential it is not a lancelet. sent2: the fact that if the fact that the Snow is not a blain but an exponential is not correct the woodwork is breastless hold. sent3: if that the bacchanal is not a kind of a detail but it vaticinates is false then the niece does not vaticinates. sent4: the Snow vaticinates if it yields mezzanine. sent5: the Snow yields mezzanine. sent6: The mezzanine yields Snow. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the Snow is not a blain and is a kind of an exponential the fact that it is not a lancelet is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Snow is not a blain but exponential.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Snow is not a lancelet.; sent4 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the Snow does vaticinate is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__