that the chigger is not dyslexic is not false.
sent1: the wallpaperer is a vireo and dissonates if something is a hauler. sent2: the dugout does refrain argus if the fact that the sensation does refrain argus and/or it does not dissonate is not correct. sent3: if the climatologist is not a hoper the wallpaperer is suburban and does not refrain mail. sent4: the brakes is a kind of a hauler and it is a kind of a qibla. sent5: the sensation is dyslexic. sent6: that the brakes does not refrain mail and/or it refrains dugout is not true if the wallpaperer does not refrain mail. sent7: the fact that either the sensation does refrain argus or it does not dissonate or both is wrong. sent8: the chestnut is not a hoper and does not refrain dugout if the climatologist is a kind of a maturation. sent9: if something is not a hoper and does not refrain dugout then it does not refrain argus. sent10: the climatologist is dyslexic if there is something such that that it does dissonate is true. sent11: the climatologist is not a hoper. sent12: the fact that the dugout is a kind of a maturation is not false if there is something such that the fact that it does not refrain mail or it does refrain dugout or both is false. sent13: if something is dyslexic it is a maturation. sent14: if a maturation does refrain argus then that the chigger is not dyslexic is right.
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the wallpaperer is suburban and does not refrain mail.; int1 -> int2: the wallpaperer does not refrain mail.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that either the brakes does not refrain mail or it does refrain dugout or both is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that either it does not refrain mail or it refrains dugout or both does not hold.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the dugout is a maturation.; sent2 & sent7 -> int6: the dugout does refrain argus.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the dugout is a maturation and it refrains argus.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a maturation and does refrain argus.; int8 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the chestnut does not refrain argus.
sent9 -> int9: if the chestnut is not a kind of a hoper and it does not refrain dugout that it does not refrain argus is not wrong.; sent13 -> int10: the climatologist is a maturation if the fact that it is dyslexic is right.; sent4 -> int11: the brakes is a hauler.; int11 -> int12: something is a hauler.; int12 & sent1 -> int13: the wallpaperer is a vireo and dissonates.; int13 -> int14: the wallpaperer dissonates.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it does dissonate.; int15 & sent10 -> int16: the climatologist is dyslexic.; int10 & int16 -> int17: the climatologist is a maturation.; sent8 & int17 -> int18: the chestnut is not a hoper and it does not refrain dugout.; int9 & int18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the chigger is not dyslexic is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the wallpaperer is a vireo and dissonates if something is a hauler. sent2: the dugout does refrain argus if the fact that the sensation does refrain argus and/or it does not dissonate is not correct. sent3: if the climatologist is not a hoper the wallpaperer is suburban and does not refrain mail. sent4: the brakes is a kind of a hauler and it is a kind of a qibla. sent5: the sensation is dyslexic. sent6: that the brakes does not refrain mail and/or it refrains dugout is not true if the wallpaperer does not refrain mail. sent7: the fact that either the sensation does refrain argus or it does not dissonate or both is wrong. sent8: the chestnut is not a hoper and does not refrain dugout if the climatologist is a kind of a maturation. sent9: if something is not a hoper and does not refrain dugout then it does not refrain argus. sent10: the climatologist is dyslexic if there is something such that that it does dissonate is true. sent11: the climatologist is not a hoper. sent12: the fact that the dugout is a kind of a maturation is not false if there is something such that the fact that it does not refrain mail or it does refrain dugout or both is false. sent13: if something is dyslexic it is a maturation. sent14: if a maturation does refrain argus then that the chigger is not dyslexic is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the wallpaperer is suburban and does not refrain mail.; int1 -> int2: the wallpaperer does not refrain mail.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that either the brakes does not refrain mail or it does refrain dugout or both is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that either it does not refrain mail or it refrains dugout or both does not hold.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the dugout is a maturation.; sent2 & sent7 -> int6: the dugout does refrain argus.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the dugout is a maturation and it refrains argus.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a maturation and does refrain argus.; int8 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__