there exists something such that the fact that it is statistical and it is ambiversive does not hold.
sent1: the piezometer is not a loft if the larkspur is oracular but it does not scent electroshock. sent2: something is a kind of statistical thing that is ambiversive. sent3: the paramagnet is not a Danish. sent4: the piezometer does not run antiprotozoal if it is a concern and does not loft. sent5: the piezometer is a concern. sent6: the anxiolytic runs antiprotozoal but it is not a Danish. sent7: something does not interrupt if the fact that it is a concern and it runs antiprotozoal does not hold. sent8: the fact that something is statistical and it is ambiversive does not hold if it does not run antiprotozoal. sent9: the piezometer concerns and is not a loft. sent10: if the piezometer is not ambiversive then the fact that it is a petfood and it peoples is incorrect.
sent8 -> int1: if the piezometer does not run antiprotozoal that it is statistical and it is ambiversive is not true.; sent4 & sent9 -> int2: the piezometer does not run antiprotozoal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the piezometer is statistical thing that is ambiversive is wrong.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the piezometer is not an interrupt.
sent7 -> int4: if the fact that the piezometer is a concern and does run antiprotozoal is false it is not an interrupt.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is statistical and it is ambiversive does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the piezometer is not a loft if the larkspur is oracular but it does not scent electroshock. sent2: something is a kind of statistical thing that is ambiversive. sent3: the paramagnet is not a Danish. sent4: the piezometer does not run antiprotozoal if it is a concern and does not loft. sent5: the piezometer is a concern. sent6: the anxiolytic runs antiprotozoal but it is not a Danish. sent7: something does not interrupt if the fact that it is a concern and it runs antiprotozoal does not hold. sent8: the fact that something is statistical and it is ambiversive does not hold if it does not run antiprotozoal. sent9: the piezometer concerns and is not a loft. sent10: if the piezometer is not ambiversive then the fact that it is a petfood and it peoples is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the piezometer does not run antiprotozoal that it is statistical and it is ambiversive is not true.; sent4 & sent9 -> int2: the piezometer does not run antiprotozoal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the piezometer is statistical thing that is ambiversive is wrong.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__