that the witch is a kind of a Camelidae hold.
sent1: the Sinologist is not a Fothergilla if it is not synonymous. sent2: something bloods if the fact that it is not a kind of a hoist and it does alight is false. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not retouch gluttony and is atonal does not hold. sent4: if something is not perithelial then it is Sabahan. sent5: something is an evangelist if it is not a Fothergilla or is an evangelist or both. sent6: the witch does not retouch Ham if there is something such that it invigorates. sent7: something is not a Camelidae if it is both not censorial and not a dazzled. sent8: something is a Camelidae if that it is not a kind of an evangelist and is a dazzled is false. sent9: the witch is a kind of a Klopstock if it is not crustal. sent10: if that something is not juiceless but it is indiscernible is not true it is a Callicebus. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a calender and does not retouch Ham does not hold. sent12: if the outerwear is not an evangelist that it is not Atlantic and is reducible is false. sent13: if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a calender and does not retouch Ham is wrong the witch is not censorial. sent14: if that that the outerwear is not non-synonymous and not non-Franciscan is not incorrect does not hold then the Sinologist is not non-synonymous. sent15: the witch is odorless if it does not obey woven.
sent11 & sent13 -> int1: the witch is non-censorial.; sent8 -> int2: if that the witch is not an evangelist but it dazzles is not correct then it is a Camelidae.;
the witch is not a Camelidae.
sent7 -> int3: the witch is not a Camelidae if it is non-censorial thing that is not a dazzled.; sent5 -> int4: the Sinologist is an evangelist if it is not a Fothergilla and/or it is an evangelist.;
$hypothesis$ = that the witch is a kind of a Camelidae hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Sinologist is not a Fothergilla if it is not synonymous. sent2: something bloods if the fact that it is not a kind of a hoist and it does alight is false. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not retouch gluttony and is atonal does not hold. sent4: if something is not perithelial then it is Sabahan. sent5: something is an evangelist if it is not a Fothergilla or is an evangelist or both. sent6: the witch does not retouch Ham if there is something such that it invigorates. sent7: something is not a Camelidae if it is both not censorial and not a dazzled. sent8: something is a Camelidae if that it is not a kind of an evangelist and is a dazzled is false. sent9: the witch is a kind of a Klopstock if it is not crustal. sent10: if that something is not juiceless but it is indiscernible is not true it is a Callicebus. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is not a calender and does not retouch Ham does not hold. sent12: if the outerwear is not an evangelist that it is not Atlantic and is reducible is false. sent13: if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a calender and does not retouch Ham is wrong the witch is not censorial. sent14: if that that the outerwear is not non-synonymous and not non-Franciscan is not incorrect does not hold then the Sinologist is not non-synonymous. sent15: the witch is odorless if it does not obey woven. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent13 -> int1: the witch is non-censorial.; sent8 -> int2: if that the witch is not an evangelist but it dazzles is not correct then it is a Camelidae.; __UNKNOWN__