the fact that the pulpwood is Mishnaic hold.
sent1: that the pulpwood alibis IC and it is Mishnaic is wrong if there exists something such that it does not offer councillor. sent2: there is something such that it is a kind of a Sennett. sent3: if something is neuroendocrine then it is a pterion. sent4: the fact that the ivy does not offer councillor and does alibi IC is wrong if there exists something such that it is not a Nasser. sent5: if there is something such that it does offer councillor then the pulpwood is Mishnaic. sent6: the ivy is Mishnaic if there is something such that it offers councillor. sent7: if something is a pterion then that it is a Kampala and does not alibi IC is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not offer councillor and it alibis IC is not wrong. sent9: the miniskirt is a gatehouse if something is a kind of a Sennett. sent10: if that something is a Nasser and it is Mishnaic is not correct it is Mishnaic. sent11: the ivy is a Nasser if the pulpwood does offer councillor. sent12: if the crammer is a gatehouse the cigarfish strains bunk. sent13: the geoduck is Mishnaic if the ivy is a Nasser. sent14: that the crammer is a gatehouse is not wrong if the miniskirt is a kind of a gatehouse. sent15: the pulpwood is Mishnaic if there exists something such that that it does not offer councillor and it alibis IC is incorrect. sent16: the shopper is neuroendocrine if the cigarfish does strain bunk. sent17: the fact that the ivy offers councillor and it does alibi IC does not hold.
the geoduck is Mishnaic.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pulpwood is Mishnaic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pulpwood alibis IC and it is Mishnaic is wrong if there exists something such that it does not offer councillor. sent2: there is something such that it is a kind of a Sennett. sent3: if something is neuroendocrine then it is a pterion. sent4: the fact that the ivy does not offer councillor and does alibi IC is wrong if there exists something such that it is not a Nasser. sent5: if there is something such that it does offer councillor then the pulpwood is Mishnaic. sent6: the ivy is Mishnaic if there is something such that it offers councillor. sent7: if something is a pterion then that it is a Kampala and does not alibi IC is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it does not offer councillor and it alibis IC is not wrong. sent9: the miniskirt is a gatehouse if something is a kind of a Sennett. sent10: if that something is a Nasser and it is Mishnaic is not correct it is Mishnaic. sent11: the ivy is a Nasser if the pulpwood does offer councillor. sent12: if the crammer is a gatehouse the cigarfish strains bunk. sent13: the geoduck is Mishnaic if the ivy is a Nasser. sent14: that the crammer is a gatehouse is not wrong if the miniskirt is a kind of a gatehouse. sent15: the pulpwood is Mishnaic if there exists something such that that it does not offer councillor and it alibis IC is incorrect. sent16: the shopper is neuroendocrine if the cigarfish does strain bunk. sent17: the fact that the ivy offers councillor and it does alibi IC does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__