the whelping Mugilidae occurs.
sent1: if the unmaliciousness happens then the fact that the whelping Mugilidae but not the kidnapping cashcard happens is false. sent2: if the Bond does not occur the unmaliciousness occurs and the motionalness happens. sent3: the salute does not occur if the careening happens but the irritation does not occur. sent4: that the whelping Mugilidae and the maliciousness happens is incorrect if the motionalness happens. sent5: if that the whelping Mugilidae but not the kidnapping cashcard happens is not correct the kidnapping cashcard happens. sent6: the fact that both the bacteriologicalness and the individuating mifepristone happens is not true if that the saluting does not occur hold. sent7: the whelping Mugilidae occurs if the fact that either the motionalness does not occur or the unmaliciousness does not occur or both is incorrect. sent8: that the careening does not occur is prevented by the wailing. sent9: that the hornpipe occurs and the vigilantism occurs is caused by the non-bacteriologicalness. sent10: the vigilantism triggers that the ultimate but not the Bond occurs. sent11: the bacteriologicalness does not occur if that the bacteriologicalness occurs and the individuating mifepristone happens does not hold. sent12: the wailing occurs if the sericulturalness happens. sent13: the motionalness occurs. sent14: the unmaliciousness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the whelping Mugilidae happens is correct.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the whelping Mugilidae and the non-unmaliciousness happens.; sent4 & sent13 -> int2: that the whelping Mugilidae but not the unmaliciousness occurs is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the whelping Mugilidae occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the whelping Mugilidae occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the unmaliciousness happens then the fact that the whelping Mugilidae but not the kidnapping cashcard happens is false. sent2: if the Bond does not occur the unmaliciousness occurs and the motionalness happens. sent3: the salute does not occur if the careening happens but the irritation does not occur. sent4: that the whelping Mugilidae and the maliciousness happens is incorrect if the motionalness happens. sent5: if that the whelping Mugilidae but not the kidnapping cashcard happens is not correct the kidnapping cashcard happens. sent6: the fact that both the bacteriologicalness and the individuating mifepristone happens is not true if that the saluting does not occur hold. sent7: the whelping Mugilidae occurs if the fact that either the motionalness does not occur or the unmaliciousness does not occur or both is incorrect. sent8: that the careening does not occur is prevented by the wailing. sent9: that the hornpipe occurs and the vigilantism occurs is caused by the non-bacteriologicalness. sent10: the vigilantism triggers that the ultimate but not the Bond occurs. sent11: the bacteriologicalness does not occur if that the bacteriologicalness occurs and the individuating mifepristone happens does not hold. sent12: the wailing occurs if the sericulturalness happens. sent13: the motionalness occurs. sent14: the unmaliciousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the whelping Mugilidae happens is correct.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the whelping Mugilidae and the non-unmaliciousness happens.; sent4 & sent13 -> int2: that the whelping Mugilidae but not the unmaliciousness occurs is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__