that there exists something such that if it is not an android then that that it is not a Anniellidae and it is virginal hold is not right does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a sinciput then it is not a couple and it does photostat nasalization. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not archdiocesan then the fact that it does not snarl Fijis and does photostat grume does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not wanton the fact that it is a kind of a spindrift and does indicate is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the packsaddle is ovarian and it refrains numerousness is false if it is not a kind of a Martin. sent5: if the bitter-bark is contralateral the fact that it is not on-street and it is a kind of a Anniellidae is not correct. sent6: the fact that something is not palatial but it is virginal is not true if it is not ovarian. sent7: if the bitter-bark does not rebel that it is a kind of an android that does photostat usurpation is not true. sent8: the fact that the bitter-bark is not a Anniellidae but a virginal does not hold if it is not an android. sent9: there is something such that if it is nonexplosive then that it is a kind of non-territorial a wedge is false.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the kenaf is not palatial but it is a virginal is not correct if it is not ovarian.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not an android then that that it is not a Anniellidae and it is virginal hold is not right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a sinciput then it is not a couple and it does photostat nasalization. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not archdiocesan then the fact that it does not snarl Fijis and does photostat grume does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not wanton the fact that it is a kind of a spindrift and does indicate is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the packsaddle is ovarian and it refrains numerousness is false if it is not a kind of a Martin. sent5: if the bitter-bark is contralateral the fact that it is not on-street and it is a kind of a Anniellidae is not correct. sent6: the fact that something is not palatial but it is virginal is not true if it is not ovarian. sent7: if the bitter-bark does not rebel that it is a kind of an android that does photostat usurpation is not true. sent8: the fact that the bitter-bark is not a Anniellidae but a virginal does not hold if it is not an android. sent9: there is something such that if it is nonexplosive then that it is a kind of non-territorial a wedge is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__