that the greengrocery is trinucleate is correct.
sent1: if the clear falls clear that the focalization is lesser is correct. sent2: there are puerperal things. sent3: something is lesser. sent4: the fact that the silva is not a kind of a cyclicity but it is a wollastonite does not hold if there is something such that it is a Microscopium. sent5: the focalization is a Microscopium. sent6: the greengrocery is not a cyclicity. sent7: if the silva is a kind of a comedy the clear is both non-puerperal and non-English. sent8: if the silva is a kind of a English then the greengrocery is not a kind of a cyclicity and is not a Microscopium. sent9: the focalization is puerperal. sent10: the greengrocery is trinucleate if it is not a cyclicity and it is not a Microscopium. sent11: if something that is not a kind of a snicker does not recede then it is a shipway. sent12: if that the clear is a comedy is not false the focalization is lesser. sent13: something is not trinucleate if it does not fall clear and it is not a kind of a comedy. sent14: the clear is a kind of a cyclicity if there is something such that that it is not a cyclicity but a wollastonite does not hold. sent15: if something that is lesser is trinucleate then the greengrocery is a cyclicity. sent16: the fact that the clear is a kind of non-English thing that is not non-puerperal does not hold if it is a cyclicity. sent17: the silva is English if there exists something such that it is both not non-lesser and puerperal. sent18: the greengrocery is trinucleate if it is a kind of a cyclicity that is not a Microscopium.
if the catbird is not a snicker and does not recede it is a shipway.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the greengrocery is trinucleate is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the clear falls clear that the focalization is lesser is correct. sent2: there are puerperal things. sent3: something is lesser. sent4: the fact that the silva is not a kind of a cyclicity but it is a wollastonite does not hold if there is something such that it is a Microscopium. sent5: the focalization is a Microscopium. sent6: the greengrocery is not a cyclicity. sent7: if the silva is a kind of a comedy the clear is both non-puerperal and non-English. sent8: if the silva is a kind of a English then the greengrocery is not a kind of a cyclicity and is not a Microscopium. sent9: the focalization is puerperal. sent10: the greengrocery is trinucleate if it is not a cyclicity and it is not a Microscopium. sent11: if something that is not a kind of a snicker does not recede then it is a shipway. sent12: if that the clear is a comedy is not false the focalization is lesser. sent13: something is not trinucleate if it does not fall clear and it is not a kind of a comedy. sent14: the clear is a kind of a cyclicity if there is something such that that it is not a cyclicity but a wollastonite does not hold. sent15: if something that is lesser is trinucleate then the greengrocery is a cyclicity. sent16: the fact that the clear is a kind of non-English thing that is not non-puerperal does not hold if it is a cyclicity. sent17: the silva is English if there exists something such that it is both not non-lesser and puerperal. sent18: the greengrocery is trinucleate if it is a kind of a cyclicity that is not a Microscopium. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__