the fact that if the realigning hypallage happens the comfortableness does not occur is false.
sent1: that both the verticalness and the nightwork occurs is triggered by that the glowering does not occur. sent2: that the photoconductivity and the frosting happens is not wrong. sent3: if that both the Bavarianness and the mock happens is not true then the comfortableness does not occur. sent4: the comfortableness occurs. sent5: the deserts does not occur if the fact that the reentry does not occur and the adventuristicness does not occur is not true. sent6: the separationism does not occur if the realigning Brigit occurs. sent7: that the Bavarian and the mock happens is not true if the abomination does not occur. sent8: the preferment does not occur. sent9: the fact that if the confection happens the fact that the sass and the non-herbivorousness happens is false hold. sent10: the Libyanness does not occur. sent11: the spectrographicness is prevented by that the realigning Brigit does not occur. sent12: the nightwork occurs and the glowering occurs. sent13: the sass does not occur if the fact that the sass and the non-herbivorousness happens is not true. sent14: the abomination does not occur if the realigning hypallage happens and the glowering happens. sent15: both the realigning Brigit and the frolicking guaiacum occurs if the deserting does not occur. sent16: that both the roar and the confection happens is caused by that the separationism does not occur. sent17: the stepping occurs. sent18: the officializing Hausa does not occur. sent19: both the realigning hypallage and the abomination occurs if the mock does not occur. sent20: the fact that the leadership occurs is true if the elbowing Sedna happens. sent21: if that the sassing does not occur is right that the comfortableness and the Bavarianness happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the realigning hypallage occurs.; sent12 -> int1: the fact that the glowering happens is not false.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the realigning hypallage occurs and the glowering occurs.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: the abomination does not occur.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the Bavarianness and the mock happens is incorrect.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the comfortableness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the vertical occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the realigning hypallage happens the comfortableness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the verticalness and the nightwork occurs is triggered by that the glowering does not occur. sent2: that the photoconductivity and the frosting happens is not wrong. sent3: if that both the Bavarianness and the mock happens is not true then the comfortableness does not occur. sent4: the comfortableness occurs. sent5: the deserts does not occur if the fact that the reentry does not occur and the adventuristicness does not occur is not true. sent6: the separationism does not occur if the realigning Brigit occurs. sent7: that the Bavarian and the mock happens is not true if the abomination does not occur. sent8: the preferment does not occur. sent9: the fact that if the confection happens the fact that the sass and the non-herbivorousness happens is false hold. sent10: the Libyanness does not occur. sent11: the spectrographicness is prevented by that the realigning Brigit does not occur. sent12: the nightwork occurs and the glowering occurs. sent13: the sass does not occur if the fact that the sass and the non-herbivorousness happens is not true. sent14: the abomination does not occur if the realigning hypallage happens and the glowering happens. sent15: both the realigning Brigit and the frolicking guaiacum occurs if the deserting does not occur. sent16: that both the roar and the confection happens is caused by that the separationism does not occur. sent17: the stepping occurs. sent18: the officializing Hausa does not occur. sent19: both the realigning hypallage and the abomination occurs if the mock does not occur. sent20: the fact that the leadership occurs is true if the elbowing Sedna happens. sent21: if that the sassing does not occur is right that the comfortableness and the Bavarianness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the realigning hypallage occurs.; sent12 -> int1: the fact that the glowering happens is not false.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the realigning hypallage occurs and the glowering occurs.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: the abomination does not occur.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the Bavarianness and the mock happens is incorrect.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the comfortableness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__