that the reheating titfer occurs is not wrong.
sent1: if the gerundialness does not occur then that the fact that the anguish occurs and the iambic occurs is not correct is not wrong. sent2: the joust occurs and the court-martialing does not occur if the drilling incrustation does not occur. sent3: the unmusicalness but not the blight happens if the tailgating RCMP happens. sent4: that the gerundialness does not occur is triggered by that that the joust occurs but the court-martialing does not occur is correct. sent5: the fact that the reheating devil happens and the pavane does not occur does not hold if the lobotomy does not occur. sent6: that the confutation occurs is not false. sent7: the ingraining happens and the confutation happens if the reheating innovativeness does not occur. sent8: the reheating titfer occurs if the ingraining does not occur. sent9: the drilling incrustation does not occur if the fact that the puddling occurs and the conventionalization occurs is wrong. sent10: the reheating milk occurs. sent11: if the blighting does not occur then that the puddle happens and the conventionalization happens is not right. sent12: the fact that the implicitness does not occur and the tailgating RCMP does not occur does not hold if the perceptibleness happens. sent13: if the fact that the implicitness does not occur and the tailgating RCMP does not occur is not right the tailgating RCMP occurs. sent14: the reheating innovativeness does not occur if that the reheating devil happens and the pavane does not occur does not hold. sent15: if that the anguish and the iambicness happens is not correct the fact that the lobotomy does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: that the confutation does not occur leads to that the ingraining does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the reheating milk but the confutation occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the reheating milk does not occur.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the reheating milk does not occur but the confutation occurs is wrong.;
that the reheating titfer does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the reheating titfer occurs is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gerundialness does not occur then that the fact that the anguish occurs and the iambic occurs is not correct is not wrong. sent2: the joust occurs and the court-martialing does not occur if the drilling incrustation does not occur. sent3: the unmusicalness but not the blight happens if the tailgating RCMP happens. sent4: that the gerundialness does not occur is triggered by that that the joust occurs but the court-martialing does not occur is correct. sent5: the fact that the reheating devil happens and the pavane does not occur does not hold if the lobotomy does not occur. sent6: that the confutation occurs is not false. sent7: the ingraining happens and the confutation happens if the reheating innovativeness does not occur. sent8: the reheating titfer occurs if the ingraining does not occur. sent9: the drilling incrustation does not occur if the fact that the puddling occurs and the conventionalization occurs is wrong. sent10: the reheating milk occurs. sent11: if the blighting does not occur then that the puddle happens and the conventionalization happens is not right. sent12: the fact that the implicitness does not occur and the tailgating RCMP does not occur does not hold if the perceptibleness happens. sent13: if the fact that the implicitness does not occur and the tailgating RCMP does not occur is not right the tailgating RCMP occurs. sent14: the reheating innovativeness does not occur if that the reheating devil happens and the pavane does not occur does not hold. sent15: if that the anguish and the iambicness happens is not correct the fact that the lobotomy does not occur is not incorrect. sent16: that the confutation does not occur leads to that the ingraining does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the reheating milk but the confutation occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the reheating milk does not occur.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the reheating milk does not occur but the confutation occurs is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__