that the cartridge compromises destroyer and it is a kind of a Eurylaimidae is not true.
sent1: something is not electrocardiographic if the fact that it is both electrocardiographic and not a Eurylaimidae does not hold. sent2: a bladdery thing does not quiver refilling. sent3: the clear is electrocardiographic if the scaler is organizational. sent4: the scaler is a FNMA and it is a hypertensive. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a Verne then the fact that the cartridge is a Verne that is organizational is wrong. sent6: if the scaler is a kind of a FNMA and it is a kind of a hypertensive it is not a Verne. sent7: the fact that the cruet is a Verne and it is a Eurylaimidae does not hold. sent8: something is not bladdery. sent9: if the cruet is not a Verne that the cartridge compromises destroyer and is a Eurylaimidae is incorrect. sent10: there exists something such that it is bladdery. sent11: the fact that the scaler is organizational is not incorrect. sent12: the cartridge is a Eurylaimidae that is bladdery if it is not electrocardiographic. sent13: something is a kind of bladdery thing that is unreproducible if it is not electrocardiographic. sent14: if the scaler is not electrocardiographic then that the cartridge compromises destroyer and is organizational is not right. sent15: everything is not vicarial. sent16: if the fact that something is both a Verne and organizational does not hold then it is not electrocardiographic. sent17: the cartridge is unreproducible if the fact that something is not a Eurylaimidae hold. sent18: if something is non-bladdery then the clear is unreproducible. sent19: if something is not vicarial then the fact that that it is not unreproducible and it does not compromise destroyer is not false does not hold. sent20: if the clear is unreproducible and it is electrocardiographic the cruet is not a kind of a Verne. sent21: the clear is a kind of a Verne.
sent8 & sent18 -> int1: the fact that the clear is unreproducible is not false.; sent3 & sent11 -> int2: that the clear is electrocardiographic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the clear is unreproducible and it is electrocardiographic.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the cruet is not a Verne.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the cartridge does compromise destroyer and is a kind of a Eurylaimidae.
sent16 -> int5: if that the cartridge is both a Verne and organizational is incorrect it is not electrocardiographic.; sent4 & sent6 -> int6: the scaler is not a Verne.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Verne.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the cartridge is both a Verne and organizational does not hold.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the cartridge is non-electrocardiographic.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the cartridge is a kind of a Eurylaimidae that is bladdery.; int10 -> int11: the cartridge is a kind of a Eurylaimidae.; sent19 -> int12: the fact that the cruet is not unreproducible and does not compromise destroyer does not hold if it is not vicarial.; sent15 -> int13: the cruet is not vicarial.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the cruet is non-unreproducible thing that does not compromise destroyer does not hold.; int14 -> int15: there exists nothing such that it is non-unreproducible thing that does not compromise destroyer.; int15 -> int16: that the clear is not unreproducible and does not compromise destroyer is not true.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that that it is not unreproducible and does not compromise destroyer does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the cartridge compromises destroyer and it is a kind of a Eurylaimidae is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not electrocardiographic if the fact that it is both electrocardiographic and not a Eurylaimidae does not hold. sent2: a bladdery thing does not quiver refilling. sent3: the clear is electrocardiographic if the scaler is organizational. sent4: the scaler is a FNMA and it is a hypertensive. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a Verne then the fact that the cartridge is a Verne that is organizational is wrong. sent6: if the scaler is a kind of a FNMA and it is a kind of a hypertensive it is not a Verne. sent7: the fact that the cruet is a Verne and it is a Eurylaimidae does not hold. sent8: something is not bladdery. sent9: if the cruet is not a Verne that the cartridge compromises destroyer and is a Eurylaimidae is incorrect. sent10: there exists something such that it is bladdery. sent11: the fact that the scaler is organizational is not incorrect. sent12: the cartridge is a Eurylaimidae that is bladdery if it is not electrocardiographic. sent13: something is a kind of bladdery thing that is unreproducible if it is not electrocardiographic. sent14: if the scaler is not electrocardiographic then that the cartridge compromises destroyer and is organizational is not right. sent15: everything is not vicarial. sent16: if the fact that something is both a Verne and organizational does not hold then it is not electrocardiographic. sent17: the cartridge is unreproducible if the fact that something is not a Eurylaimidae hold. sent18: if something is non-bladdery then the clear is unreproducible. sent19: if something is not vicarial then the fact that that it is not unreproducible and it does not compromise destroyer is not false does not hold. sent20: if the clear is unreproducible and it is electrocardiographic the cruet is not a kind of a Verne. sent21: the clear is a kind of a Verne. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent18 -> int1: the fact that the clear is unreproducible is not false.; sent3 & sent11 -> int2: that the clear is electrocardiographic is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the clear is unreproducible and it is electrocardiographic.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the cruet is not a Verne.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__