that there exists something such that if that it is tortious is true it does not recur is not correct.
sent1: if the pledger is not a kind of a reservoir but it does recur the elsholtzia recur. sent2: the coville is not intrastate if it is a tourist and it is urceolate. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is not headless and/or is tortious is incorrect the frosting is ethnographic. sent4: the pledger is a kind of a reservoir and it is ethnographic. sent5: if the re does not behold Scolytidae it is both a piolet and an anklebone. sent6: the pledger does recur if it is tortious. sent7: the pledger is tortious if it is a kind of ethnographic thing that recurs. sent8: if something is ethnographic and it does recur then it is tortious. sent9: that something is not tortious hold if it is ethnographic and it does recur. sent10: if something is a piolet then the fact that either it is not headless or it is tortious or both is not true.
sent4 -> int1: the pledger is ethnographic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pledger does recur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pledger is a kind of ethnographic thing that recurs.; sent9 -> int3: the pledger is not tortious if it is ethnographic and it does recur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pledger is not tortious.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the pledger is tortious is not false.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the pledger does not recur.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: if that the pledger is not non-tortious is right it does not recur.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the elsholtzia does recur hold.
sent10 -> int8: that the fact that the re is not headless or it is tortious or both is correct is wrong if it is a piolet.;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it is tortious is true it does not recur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pledger is not a kind of a reservoir but it does recur the elsholtzia recur. sent2: the coville is not intrastate if it is a tourist and it is urceolate. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is not headless and/or is tortious is incorrect the frosting is ethnographic. sent4: the pledger is a kind of a reservoir and it is ethnographic. sent5: if the re does not behold Scolytidae it is both a piolet and an anklebone. sent6: the pledger does recur if it is tortious. sent7: the pledger is tortious if it is a kind of ethnographic thing that recurs. sent8: if something is ethnographic and it does recur then it is tortious. sent9: that something is not tortious hold if it is ethnographic and it does recur. sent10: if something is a piolet then the fact that either it is not headless or it is tortious or both is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the pledger is ethnographic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pledger does recur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pledger is a kind of ethnographic thing that recurs.; sent9 -> int3: the pledger is not tortious if it is ethnographic and it does recur.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the pledger is not tortious.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the pledger is tortious is not false.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the pledger does not recur.; [assump2] & int6 -> int7: if that the pledger is not non-tortious is right it does not recur.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__