if the flowerlessness happens then that the decoying interrogation happens is true.
sent1: the sterilizing blubberer does not occur. sent2: the deputation and the incredibleness occurs. sent3: the swash occurs. sent4: the cooperative is triggered by that the nightlife happens. sent5: both the commanding and the canvasing happens. sent6: the sickness occurs. sent7: the foaling Grus and the ceremoniousness occurs. sent8: the fact that the Dostoevskianness occurs and the salvation occurs hold. sent9: that the check-in does not occur triggers that the decoying interrogation occurs. sent10: the alkylicness occurs and the venting worksheet occurs. sent11: that the counterblast does not occur is prevented by that the withholding does not occur. sent12: the incorruptness occurs. sent13: the northwester and the incorruptness happens. sent14: the moderation is prevented by that both the backdoor and the judgmentalness happens. sent15: the non-Slavonicness leads to that the check-in happens and the decoying interrogation occurs. sent16: the sequencing does not occur. sent17: the sterilizing funk occurs if the non-incorruptness and the floweringness happens.
sent13 -> int1: the northwester occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flowerlessness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the northwester and the flowerlessness occurs.;
the foaling Linanthus occurs and the sterilizing funk happens.
$hypothesis$ = if the flowerlessness happens then that the decoying interrogation happens is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the sterilizing blubberer does not occur. sent2: the deputation and the incredibleness occurs. sent3: the swash occurs. sent4: the cooperative is triggered by that the nightlife happens. sent5: both the commanding and the canvasing happens. sent6: the sickness occurs. sent7: the foaling Grus and the ceremoniousness occurs. sent8: the fact that the Dostoevskianness occurs and the salvation occurs hold. sent9: that the check-in does not occur triggers that the decoying interrogation occurs. sent10: the alkylicness occurs and the venting worksheet occurs. sent11: that the counterblast does not occur is prevented by that the withholding does not occur. sent12: the incorruptness occurs. sent13: the northwester and the incorruptness happens. sent14: the moderation is prevented by that both the backdoor and the judgmentalness happens. sent15: the non-Slavonicness leads to that the check-in happens and the decoying interrogation occurs. sent16: the sequencing does not occur. sent17: the sterilizing funk occurs if the non-incorruptness and the floweringness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the northwester occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flowerlessness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the northwester and the flowerlessness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__