the fact that the fact that the opsonization stains but it is not a toad-in-the-hole is incorrect hold.
sent1: that the hydrazoite is not a pectoral is true if the trawl is unmodifiable but it does not suggest sorrel. sent2: the opsonization is a stain but it is not a toad-in-the-hole if the fountain does not suggest Cumberland. sent3: the fact that the fountain is both not non-pectoral and unmodifiable is not correct if there is something such that it does not suggest Cumberland. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not suggest sorrel the fact that the opsonization is a stain that is not a toad-in-the-hole is incorrect. sent5: if the veld wets then the fact that it is not a kind of a nephrotomy and is an overgrowth does not hold. sent6: something does not suggest Cumberland. sent7: the veld does wet. sent8: if the Spaniard is not pro-choice then the trawl is unmodifiable thing that does not suggest sorrel. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nephrotomy and it is an overgrowth does not hold the wicker is not monotonic. sent10: the fact that if that the fountain is a pectoral and it is unmodifiable is false the hydrazoite does not suggest sorrel is not incorrect. sent11: that something does perambulate but it is not a kind of a Yemeni is not true if it is not monotonic.
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the fountain is pectoral thing that is unmodifiable does not hold.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the hydrazoite does not suggest sorrel.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not suggest sorrel is true.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the opsonization is a stain but it is not a kind of a toad-in-the-hole.
sent11 -> int4: that the wicker does perambulate but it is not a kind of a Yemeni is not right if the fact that it is not monotonic is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent7 -> int5: that the veld is not a nephrotomy and is an overgrowth is not true.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it is not a nephrotomy and it is an overgrowth is incorrect.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: that the wicker is not monotonic is not wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: that the wicker does perambulate but it is non-Yemeni is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it perambulates and it is not Yemeni is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the opsonization stains but it is not a toad-in-the-hole is incorrect hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the hydrazoite is not a pectoral is true if the trawl is unmodifiable but it does not suggest sorrel. sent2: the opsonization is a stain but it is not a toad-in-the-hole if the fountain does not suggest Cumberland. sent3: the fact that the fountain is both not non-pectoral and unmodifiable is not correct if there is something such that it does not suggest Cumberland. sent4: if there exists something such that it does not suggest sorrel the fact that the opsonization is a stain that is not a toad-in-the-hole is incorrect. sent5: if the veld wets then the fact that it is not a kind of a nephrotomy and is an overgrowth does not hold. sent6: something does not suggest Cumberland. sent7: the veld does wet. sent8: if the Spaniard is not pro-choice then the trawl is unmodifiable thing that does not suggest sorrel. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a nephrotomy and it is an overgrowth does not hold the wicker is not monotonic. sent10: the fact that if that the fountain is a pectoral and it is unmodifiable is false the hydrazoite does not suggest sorrel is not incorrect. sent11: that something does perambulate but it is not a kind of a Yemeni is not true if it is not monotonic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the fountain is pectoral thing that is unmodifiable does not hold.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the hydrazoite does not suggest sorrel.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not suggest sorrel is true.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__