the propagandist is a kind of a balance and it is a Clotho.
sent1: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Pomolobus or is a Clotho or both does not hold then it is a ununpentium. sent2: the propagandist snicks solvency if the Spode balances. sent3: the Spode snicks Polo if something is not geriatric. sent4: if that something is either not a illuminance or a Mayday or both is false it is a Clotho. sent5: if that the propagandist is not a kind of a Clotho and/or it is a Colombian does not hold it does snick Spode. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a buckle. sent7: if that something is not a kind of a Clotho or it snicks solvency or both is not correct it is a balance. sent8: the propagandist is a chlorambucil. sent9: something is a illuminance if that it is a balance or it snicks solvency or both is not correct. sent10: the fact that the Spode is a kind of a chlorambucil is not incorrect. sent11: the Spode does snick solvency. sent12: if the Spode snicks solvency the fact that the propagandist is not a kind of a illuminance and/or is a kind of a Mayday is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the fact that the foster-parent is not a Clotho and/or it is a myotomy is incorrect is not wrong. sent14: if that something is a kind of a illuminance and/or it is a balance does not hold then it snicks solvency. sent15: something is not a kind of a balance if it is geriatric thing that does not snick solvency. sent16: the Spode is geriatric if the fact that it does not snick solvency and/or it is a illuminance is not true. sent17: something does not snick kiang. sent18: there is something such that it is not a chlorambucil. sent19: something does not snick solvency. sent20: The solvency does snick Spode. sent21: the fact that either the Spode does not snick solvency or it is a kind of a balance or both is incorrect if the propagandist is a Mayday. sent22: the fact that something is a kind of a chlorambucil is not incorrect. sent23: if something is not a chlorambucil the propagandist is geriatric. sent24: the fact that something is a balance is not false if that it is geriatric is not incorrect. sent25: the fact that the Spode either is not a illuminance or dogmatizes or both does not hold. sent26: if the Spode does snick solvency the propagandist is a illuminance.
sent12 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the propagandist is not a kind of a illuminance and/or it is a Mayday does not hold.; sent4 -> int2: the propagandist is a Clotho if the fact that it is not a kind of a illuminance or is a Mayday or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the propagandist is a kind of a Clotho.; sent24 -> int4: the propagandist balances if it is geriatric.; sent18 & sent23 -> int5: the propagandist is not non-geriatric.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the propagandist balances.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the meltdown is a ununpentium if that it is not a Pomolobus and/or it is a kind of a Clotho does not hold.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the propagandist is a kind of a balance and it is a Clotho. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Pomolobus or is a Clotho or both does not hold then it is a ununpentium. sent2: the propagandist snicks solvency if the Spode balances. sent3: the Spode snicks Polo if something is not geriatric. sent4: if that something is either not a illuminance or a Mayday or both is false it is a Clotho. sent5: if that the propagandist is not a kind of a Clotho and/or it is a Colombian does not hold it does snick Spode. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a buckle. sent7: if that something is not a kind of a Clotho or it snicks solvency or both is not correct it is a balance. sent8: the propagandist is a chlorambucil. sent9: something is a illuminance if that it is a balance or it snicks solvency or both is not correct. sent10: the fact that the Spode is a kind of a chlorambucil is not incorrect. sent11: the Spode does snick solvency. sent12: if the Spode snicks solvency the fact that the propagandist is not a kind of a illuminance and/or is a kind of a Mayday is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the fact that the foster-parent is not a Clotho and/or it is a myotomy is incorrect is not wrong. sent14: if that something is a kind of a illuminance and/or it is a balance does not hold then it snicks solvency. sent15: something is not a kind of a balance if it is geriatric thing that does not snick solvency. sent16: the Spode is geriatric if the fact that it does not snick solvency and/or it is a illuminance is not true. sent17: something does not snick kiang. sent18: there is something such that it is not a chlorambucil. sent19: something does not snick solvency. sent20: The solvency does snick Spode. sent21: the fact that either the Spode does not snick solvency or it is a kind of a balance or both is incorrect if the propagandist is a Mayday. sent22: the fact that something is a kind of a chlorambucil is not incorrect. sent23: if something is not a chlorambucil the propagandist is geriatric. sent24: the fact that something is a balance is not false if that it is geriatric is not incorrect. sent25: the fact that the Spode either is not a illuminance or dogmatizes or both does not hold. sent26: if the Spode does snick solvency the propagandist is a illuminance. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the propagandist is not a kind of a illuminance and/or it is a Mayday does not hold.; sent4 -> int2: the propagandist is a Clotho if the fact that it is not a kind of a illuminance or is a Mayday or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the propagandist is a kind of a Clotho.; sent24 -> int4: the propagandist balances if it is geriatric.; sent18 & sent23 -> int5: the propagandist is not non-geriatric.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the propagandist balances.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__