the fact that the busybody does nettle knee-high is not wrong.
sent1: something is not a Cepheus if it is not a Bruneian. sent2: if the secobarbital does not parch secobarbital and it does not nettle militainment then the covert parch secobarbital. sent3: if the fact that something does not nettle pittance and it does not nettle covert is not true then that it does not sojourn is not wrong. sent4: if something does not nettle samosa it is not maxillomandibular. sent5: the judas does not parch secobarbital. sent6: something does not nettle knee-high if the fact that it does nettle covert and it nettles pittance does not hold. sent7: if something is not a sojourn then it does not parch secobarbital and does nettle knee-high. sent8: if the sierra does not bereave then it is not scotomatous. sent9: the fact that the busybody does not nettle pittance but it nettles covert is incorrect. sent10: the busybody nettles pittance. sent11: if something is not a chrysanthemum it does not parch secobarbital and it does not nettle militainment. sent12: if that something does parch secobarbital and/or is unaggressive is true then the updraft does not sojourn. sent13: the fact that the calabash is a kind of a excogitator that is not a chrysanthemum is not true if something is not scotomatous. sent14: The pittance nettles busybody. sent15: the secobarbital is not a kind of a chrysanthemum if that the calabash is both a excogitator and not a chrysanthemum is incorrect. sent16: the sierra does not bereave.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the busybody does not nettle pittance and does not nettle covert.; assump1 -> int1: the busybody does not nettle pittance.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the busybody does not nettle pittance and does not nettle covert does not hold.; sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the busybody does not nettle pittance and it does not nettle covert is incorrect then it does not sojourn.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the busybody is not a kind of a sojourn.; sent7 -> int6: the busybody does not parch secobarbital but it does nettle knee-high if it is not a kind of a sojourn.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the busybody does not parch secobarbital but it nettles knee-high is right.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the busybody does not nettle knee-high.
sent6 -> int8: if that the busybody does nettle covert and nettles pittance does not hold it does not nettle knee-high.; sent11 -> int9: the secobarbital does not parch secobarbital and does not nettle militainment if it is not a chrysanthemum.; sent8 & sent16 -> int10: the sierra is not scotomatous.; int10 -> int11: something is not scotomatous.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: that the calabash is a excogitator but it is not a chrysanthemum does not hold.; sent15 & int12 -> int13: the secobarbital is not a chrysanthemum.; int9 & int13 -> int14: the secobarbital does not parch secobarbital and does not nettle militainment.; sent2 & int14 -> int15: the covert parches secobarbital.; int15 -> int16: the covert does parch secobarbital or is not aggressive or both.; int16 -> int17: something does parch secobarbital or it is not aggressive or both.; int17 & sent12 -> int18: the updraft is not a kind of a sojourn.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it does not sojourn.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the busybody does nettle knee-high is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a Cepheus if it is not a Bruneian. sent2: if the secobarbital does not parch secobarbital and it does not nettle militainment then the covert parch secobarbital. sent3: if the fact that something does not nettle pittance and it does not nettle covert is not true then that it does not sojourn is not wrong. sent4: if something does not nettle samosa it is not maxillomandibular. sent5: the judas does not parch secobarbital. sent6: something does not nettle knee-high if the fact that it does nettle covert and it nettles pittance does not hold. sent7: if something is not a sojourn then it does not parch secobarbital and does nettle knee-high. sent8: if the sierra does not bereave then it is not scotomatous. sent9: the fact that the busybody does not nettle pittance but it nettles covert is incorrect. sent10: the busybody nettles pittance. sent11: if something is not a chrysanthemum it does not parch secobarbital and it does not nettle militainment. sent12: if that something does parch secobarbital and/or is unaggressive is true then the updraft does not sojourn. sent13: the fact that the calabash is a kind of a excogitator that is not a chrysanthemum is not true if something is not scotomatous. sent14: The pittance nettles busybody. sent15: the secobarbital is not a kind of a chrysanthemum if that the calabash is both a excogitator and not a chrysanthemum is incorrect. sent16: the sierra does not bereave. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the busybody does not nettle pittance and does not nettle covert.; assump1 -> int1: the busybody does not nettle pittance.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the busybody does not nettle pittance and does not nettle covert does not hold.; sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the busybody does not nettle pittance and it does not nettle covert is incorrect then it does not sojourn.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the busybody is not a kind of a sojourn.; sent7 -> int6: the busybody does not parch secobarbital but it does nettle knee-high if it is not a kind of a sojourn.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the busybody does not parch secobarbital but it nettles knee-high is right.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__