the Oxford does not snuffle furniture and is not a bathe.
sent1: if the cenobite is not a bathe the Oxford does not snuffle furniture and is not a bathe. sent2: the cenobite is both a thinness and antipodal. sent3: the cenobite beats rococo if there exists something such that the fact that it is not easy and it is a crosstalk is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not easy and it is a kind of a crosstalk does not hold. sent5: if something beats rococo and is a kind of a thinness then it is not a bathe.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the cenobite does beat rococo is correct.; sent2 -> int2: that the cenobite is not a thinness does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cenobite beats rococo and is a kind of a thinness.; sent5 -> int4: if the cenobite beats rococo and it is a kind of a thinness then it is not a kind of a bathe.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cenobite is not a kind of a bathe.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Oxford does not snuffle furniture and is not a bathe. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cenobite is not a bathe the Oxford does not snuffle furniture and is not a bathe. sent2: the cenobite is both a thinness and antipodal. sent3: the cenobite beats rococo if there exists something such that the fact that it is not easy and it is a crosstalk is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not easy and it is a kind of a crosstalk does not hold. sent5: if something beats rococo and is a kind of a thinness then it is not a bathe. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the cenobite does beat rococo is correct.; sent2 -> int2: that the cenobite is not a thinness does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cenobite beats rococo and is a kind of a thinness.; sent5 -> int4: if the cenobite beats rococo and it is a kind of a thinness then it is not a kind of a bathe.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the cenobite is not a kind of a bathe.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__