the woodcarver thrills ornithischian.
sent1: the dinky does bedizen PIE and is a Cervus. sent2: there exists nothing such that it does not contort uplifting and it bedizens woodcarver. sent3: the woodcarver thrills ornithischian if it contorts subeditor. sent4: the woodcarver contorts subeditor if that it does not contort uplifting and does bedizen woodcarver is not true.
sent2 -> int1: that the woodcarver does not contort uplifting and bedizens woodcarver is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the woodcarver does contort subeditor.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the woodcarver does not thrill ornithischian is true.
sent1 -> int3: the dinky is a kind of a Cervus.;
$hypothesis$ = the woodcarver thrills ornithischian. ; $context$ = sent1: the dinky does bedizen PIE and is a Cervus. sent2: there exists nothing such that it does not contort uplifting and it bedizens woodcarver. sent3: the woodcarver thrills ornithischian if it contorts subeditor. sent4: the woodcarver contorts subeditor if that it does not contort uplifting and does bedizen woodcarver is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: that the woodcarver does not contort uplifting and bedizens woodcarver is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the woodcarver does contort subeditor.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__