the assembling autofluorescence happens.
sent1: if the atmosphericness does not occur then the assembling autofluorescence does not occur. sent2: if the chiromanticness does not occur then the inexcusableness does not occur. sent3: the refinement does not occur and the landing brook occurs. sent4: the refinement happens if the fact that the unattributableness occurs and/or the chiromanticness does not occur is false. sent5: the assembling autofluorescence does not occur if the fact that the atmosphericness but not the unpalatableness happens is not true. sent6: if that the unattributableness and/or the chiromanticness happens is not true the refinement occurs. sent7: that that the atmosphericness and the non-unpalatableness happens does not hold is not incorrect if the inexcusableness does not occur. sent8: that the inexcusableness occurs is prevented by either that the unattributableness happens or the non-chiromanticness or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the unattributableness and/or the non-chiromanticness occurs is not right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the refinement happens.; sent3 -> int2: the refinement does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the unattributableness and/or the non-chiromanticness occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the inexcusableness does not occur.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that both the atmosphericness and the non-unpalatableness happens is incorrect.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the assembling autofluorescence happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the atmosphericness does not occur then the assembling autofluorescence does not occur. sent2: if the chiromanticness does not occur then the inexcusableness does not occur. sent3: the refinement does not occur and the landing brook occurs. sent4: the refinement happens if the fact that the unattributableness occurs and/or the chiromanticness does not occur is false. sent5: the assembling autofluorescence does not occur if the fact that the atmosphericness but not the unpalatableness happens is not true. sent6: if that the unattributableness and/or the chiromanticness happens is not true the refinement occurs. sent7: that that the atmosphericness and the non-unpalatableness happens does not hold is not incorrect if the inexcusableness does not occur. sent8: that the inexcusableness occurs is prevented by either that the unattributableness happens or the non-chiromanticness or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the unattributableness and/or the non-chiromanticness occurs is not right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the refinement happens.; sent3 -> int2: the refinement does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the unattributableness and/or the non-chiromanticness occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the inexcusableness does not occur.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that both the atmosphericness and the non-unpalatableness happens is incorrect.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__