the fact that the immunochemicalness but not the punishment occurs is incorrect if the medicolegalness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that both the nonfatness and the non-ovularness happens is not right. sent2: the defraying precordium occurs. sent3: the fact that the fact that the sleeping happens and the leglessness does not occur does not hold if the scopalness does not occur hold. sent4: the punishment does not occur. sent5: the fact that the additive and the defraying binder happens is false if the editorship does not occur. sent6: the fact that the fact that the etymologizing happens and the salving conspirator does not occur does not hold hold. sent7: that the tiling but not the thrash happens does not hold. sent8: the fact that the immunochemicalness occurs and the punishment occurs does not hold. sent9: the salving scuff is brought about by that the immunochemicalness and the punishment happens. sent10: the immunochemicalness happens. sent11: the clocking RBC happens. sent12: the medicolegalness occurs if the salving scuff happens. sent13: that the damper occurs but the clocking interpenetration does not occur is not true if the fact that the soul does not occur is not false. sent14: if the splash occurs and the aversiveness does not occur then the fact that the diligentness happens is correct. sent15: the fact that the defraying binder but not the transmission happens if the defraying purr does not occur is not false. sent16: the fact that the nonrepresentativeness but not the basicsness happens is false. sent17: if that the surmountableness happens is not false the salving scuff does not occur. sent18: if the acidimetricness occurs then the clocking impudence happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the immunochemicalness occurs but the punishment does not occur.;
the revealing Sargent does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the immunochemicalness but not the punishment occurs is incorrect if the medicolegalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the nonfatness and the non-ovularness happens is not right. sent2: the defraying precordium occurs. sent3: the fact that the fact that the sleeping happens and the leglessness does not occur does not hold if the scopalness does not occur hold. sent4: the punishment does not occur. sent5: the fact that the additive and the defraying binder happens is false if the editorship does not occur. sent6: the fact that the fact that the etymologizing happens and the salving conspirator does not occur does not hold hold. sent7: that the tiling but not the thrash happens does not hold. sent8: the fact that the immunochemicalness occurs and the punishment occurs does not hold. sent9: the salving scuff is brought about by that the immunochemicalness and the punishment happens. sent10: the immunochemicalness happens. sent11: the clocking RBC happens. sent12: the medicolegalness occurs if the salving scuff happens. sent13: that the damper occurs but the clocking interpenetration does not occur is not true if the fact that the soul does not occur is not false. sent14: if the splash occurs and the aversiveness does not occur then the fact that the diligentness happens is correct. sent15: the fact that the defraying binder but not the transmission happens if the defraying purr does not occur is not false. sent16: the fact that the nonrepresentativeness but not the basicsness happens is false. sent17: if that the surmountableness happens is not false the salving scuff does not occur. sent18: if the acidimetricness occurs then the clocking impudence happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the immunochemicalness occurs but the punishment does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__