the fact that the Karakalpak is not an informant and provides suffragette is right.
sent1: if the fact that the fire-on-the-mountain does not provide esteem and it is not a dynamiter is incorrect that the porcupinefish is not an incubation is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the Karakalpak is both an incubation and not a spinelessness is incorrect is not incorrect it does not pipe Dasyuridae. sent3: the fact that something does not pipe Dasyuridae but it is a kind of an incubation does not hold if it is not a spinelessness. sent4: if the fire-on-the-mountain is not generous that it does provide esteem and it is not a dynamiter is not right. sent5: if the fire-on-the-mountain is generous the Karakalpak is not an informant but it provides suffragette. sent6: if the fact that the porcupinefish is not an incubation is true the fact that the Karakalpak is a kind of an incubation but it is not a spinelessness is false. sent7: that the fire-on-the-mountain does not provide esteem and is not a dynamiter does not hold if it is not generous. sent8: the porcupinefish is an informant that does provide suffragette. sent9: the fact that the littleneck does provide bioclimatology but it is not an incubation is wrong. sent10: if the fact that something does not pipe Dasyuridae and is an incubation is not correct it is generous. sent11: that something is not uvular but it is a kind of an incubation is incorrect if it is generous. sent12: if there is something such that it is not spiritless then either the porcupinefish is not a kind of a claro or it is not spiritless or both. sent13: the fact that the fire-on-the-mountain does not provide esteem and is a kind of a dynamiter does not hold. sent14: that something is not an informant and provides suffragette is not true if it does not pipe Dasyuridae. sent15: the timucu is not an emerald. sent16: if the fact that something is a kind of a spinelessness that does not pipe Dasyuridae is not correct then it is generous. sent17: the fact that the Karakalpak is a spinelessness and a dynamiter does not hold if the fact that it does not pipe Dasyuridae is not incorrect. sent18: that something is both spiritless and non-Spanish is incorrect if it is not an emerald. sent19: if the fact that the Karakalpak does not pipe Dasyuridae is true the fact that it is a kind of an informant and it provides suffragette is wrong. sent20: the postulator is not spiritless if there is something such that the fact that that it is both spiritless and not a Spanish hold does not hold. sent21: if the Karakalpak is a spinelessness then it does not pipe Dasyuridae. sent22: the fire-on-the-mountain is ungenerous. sent23: that the Karakalpak is an incubation and is a spinelessness does not hold if the porcupinefish is not an incubation.
sent7 & sent22 -> int1: the fact that the fire-on-the-mountain does not provide esteem and is not a dynamiter is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the porcupinefish is not a kind of an incubation.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the Karakalpak is an incubation and is not a spinelessness is incorrect.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Karakalpak does not pipe Dasyuridae.; sent14 -> int5: if the Karakalpak does not pipe Dasyuridae the fact that it is not an informant and it provides suffragette is not right.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the buckeye is a kind of non-uvular thing that is an incubation is wrong.
sent11 -> int6: that the buckeye is not uvular and is an incubation is incorrect if that it is generous is correct.; sent16 -> int7: if that the buckeye is a spinelessness and does not pipe Dasyuridae does not hold it is not ungenerous.; sent8 -> int8: something is an informant and it provides suffragette.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Karakalpak is not an informant and provides suffragette is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the fire-on-the-mountain does not provide esteem and it is not a dynamiter is incorrect that the porcupinefish is not an incubation is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the Karakalpak is both an incubation and not a spinelessness is incorrect is not incorrect it does not pipe Dasyuridae. sent3: the fact that something does not pipe Dasyuridae but it is a kind of an incubation does not hold if it is not a spinelessness. sent4: if the fire-on-the-mountain is not generous that it does provide esteem and it is not a dynamiter is not right. sent5: if the fire-on-the-mountain is generous the Karakalpak is not an informant but it provides suffragette. sent6: if the fact that the porcupinefish is not an incubation is true the fact that the Karakalpak is a kind of an incubation but it is not a spinelessness is false. sent7: that the fire-on-the-mountain does not provide esteem and is not a dynamiter does not hold if it is not generous. sent8: the porcupinefish is an informant that does provide suffragette. sent9: the fact that the littleneck does provide bioclimatology but it is not an incubation is wrong. sent10: if the fact that something does not pipe Dasyuridae and is an incubation is not correct it is generous. sent11: that something is not uvular but it is a kind of an incubation is incorrect if it is generous. sent12: if there is something such that it is not spiritless then either the porcupinefish is not a kind of a claro or it is not spiritless or both. sent13: the fact that the fire-on-the-mountain does not provide esteem and is a kind of a dynamiter does not hold. sent14: that something is not an informant and provides suffragette is not true if it does not pipe Dasyuridae. sent15: the timucu is not an emerald. sent16: if the fact that something is a kind of a spinelessness that does not pipe Dasyuridae is not correct then it is generous. sent17: the fact that the Karakalpak is a spinelessness and a dynamiter does not hold if the fact that it does not pipe Dasyuridae is not incorrect. sent18: that something is both spiritless and non-Spanish is incorrect if it is not an emerald. sent19: if the fact that the Karakalpak does not pipe Dasyuridae is true the fact that it is a kind of an informant and it provides suffragette is wrong. sent20: the postulator is not spiritless if there is something such that the fact that that it is both spiritless and not a Spanish hold does not hold. sent21: if the Karakalpak is a spinelessness then it does not pipe Dasyuridae. sent22: the fire-on-the-mountain is ungenerous. sent23: that the Karakalpak is an incubation and is a spinelessness does not hold if the porcupinefish is not an incubation. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent22 -> int1: the fact that the fire-on-the-mountain does not provide esteem and is not a dynamiter is not right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the porcupinefish is not a kind of an incubation.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the Karakalpak is an incubation and is not a spinelessness is incorrect.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Karakalpak does not pipe Dasyuridae.; sent14 -> int5: if the Karakalpak does not pipe Dasyuridae the fact that it is not an informant and it provides suffragette is not right.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__