the fact that both the tramp and the precocialness occurs is not true.
sent1: the firestorm happens. sent2: the bending matinee does not occur if the cardiographicness does not occur and the condoling Thunderer does not occur. sent3: the cardiographicness does not occur and the condoling Thunderer does not occur. sent4: the acetonicness does not occur if that the firestorm happens but the acting socialization does not occur is not correct. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the acting socialization does not occur and the firestorm does not occur does not hold is right then the precocialness occurs. sent6: both the tramp and the bending counterculture happens if the bending matinee does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acting socialization does not occur and the firestorm does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: that the firestorm does not occur is correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the acting socialization does not occur and the firestorm does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the precocialness happens.; sent2 & sent3 -> int5: the bending matinee does not occur.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: both the tramping and the bending counterculture occurs.; int6 -> int7: the tramping happens.; int4 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the acetonicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the tramp and the precocialness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the firestorm happens. sent2: the bending matinee does not occur if the cardiographicness does not occur and the condoling Thunderer does not occur. sent3: the cardiographicness does not occur and the condoling Thunderer does not occur. sent4: the acetonicness does not occur if that the firestorm happens but the acting socialization does not occur is not correct. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the acting socialization does not occur and the firestorm does not occur does not hold is right then the precocialness occurs. sent6: both the tramp and the bending counterculture happens if the bending matinee does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acting socialization does not occur and the firestorm does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: that the firestorm does not occur is correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the acting socialization does not occur and the firestorm does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the precocialness happens.; sent2 & sent3 -> int5: the bending matinee does not occur.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: both the tramping and the bending counterculture occurs.; int6 -> int7: the tramping happens.; int4 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__