there exists something such that if the fact that that it is non-translatable thing that is not sustentacular is not false does not hold it is not non-live.
sent1: if the prospector does not birdnest Ptilonorhynchidae and it is not translatable then that it is a bathe hold. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a gamma-interferon and it is acapnic is not correct then it prevents. sent3: there exists something such that if it is both untranslatable and not sustentacular then it does live. sent4: something is a hassium if the fact that it is not translatable and not a libido is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-kafkaesque thing that does not festoon Persia then it is a kind of a stinginess. sent6: if that the prospector is not translatable and it is not sustentacular is not right that it does live is not false.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
that the spike is a hassium is not false if the fact that it is not translatable and is not a libido is wrong.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that that it is non-translatable thing that is not sustentacular is not false does not hold it is not non-live. ; $context$ = sent1: if the prospector does not birdnest Ptilonorhynchidae and it is not translatable then that it is a bathe hold. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a gamma-interferon and it is acapnic is not correct then it prevents. sent3: there exists something such that if it is both untranslatable and not sustentacular then it does live. sent4: something is a hassium if the fact that it is not translatable and not a libido is not correct. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-kafkaesque thing that does not festoon Persia then it is a kind of a stinginess. sent6: if that the prospector is not translatable and it is not sustentacular is not right that it does live is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__