the fizz is not mealy.
sent1: the flurbiprofen is unlawful but it is not elfin if the disciple is unlawful. sent2: the silverrod is not a statute and is mealy. sent3: if the disciple is not unlawful then it is both non-carposporic and not non-mealy. sent4: the radiopacity is a host. sent5: if the disciple does not grind vertex then it is not carposporic and it is unlawful. sent6: if that the vertex either is elfin or sublimates or both is not correct then that the flurbiprofen is not elfin is not false. sent7: if something is not lobeliaceous then the fact that it is elfin and/or does sublimate is false. sent8: that the Somali grinds vertex is right. sent9: the fizz is not a Luo and does inflate. sent10: the radiopacity is ontological. sent11: if that the bluebell is lobeliaceous hold then the vertex is not lobeliaceous. sent12: That the vertex does not grind disciple hold. sent13: the flurbiprofen is mealy. sent14: if the fizz is not mealy then it is not unlawful. sent15: if the flurbiprofen grinds vertex then the fact that the disciple does grinds vertex is right. sent16: if the radiopacity is superjacent that it denationalizes Xenicidae is not false. sent17: the fizz is mealy if the flurbiprofen is unlawful but not elfin. sent18: the disciple is lawful thing that is mealy if it is not elfin. sent19: if the radiopacity does host then that it is a Monophysite is not wrong. sent20: that the disciple does not grind vertex hold. sent21: the flurbiprofen is unlawful but it is not carposporic. sent22: if the radiopacity is ontological it is superjacent. sent23: the fizz is not unlawful and conscripts sorrel if the disciple does grind vertex.
sent5 & sent20 -> int1: the disciple is non-carposporic thing that is unlawful.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the disciple is unlawful hold.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the flurbiprofen is unlawful but it is not elfin.; sent17 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fizz is not unlawful and does conscript sorrel.
sent7 -> int4: the fact that the vertex is elfin or it sublimates or both is not right if it is not lobeliaceous.; sent19 & sent4 -> int5: the radiopacity is a kind of a Monophysite.; sent22 & sent10 -> int6: the radiopacity is superjacent.; sent16 & int6 -> int7: that the radiopacity denationalizes Xenicidae hold.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the radiopacity is a Monophysite that denationalizes Xenicidae.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is a kind of a Monophysite and it does denationalize Xenicidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the fizz is not mealy. ; $context$ = sent1: the flurbiprofen is unlawful but it is not elfin if the disciple is unlawful. sent2: the silverrod is not a statute and is mealy. sent3: if the disciple is not unlawful then it is both non-carposporic and not non-mealy. sent4: the radiopacity is a host. sent5: if the disciple does not grind vertex then it is not carposporic and it is unlawful. sent6: if that the vertex either is elfin or sublimates or both is not correct then that the flurbiprofen is not elfin is not false. sent7: if something is not lobeliaceous then the fact that it is elfin and/or does sublimate is false. sent8: that the Somali grinds vertex is right. sent9: the fizz is not a Luo and does inflate. sent10: the radiopacity is ontological. sent11: if that the bluebell is lobeliaceous hold then the vertex is not lobeliaceous. sent12: That the vertex does not grind disciple hold. sent13: the flurbiprofen is mealy. sent14: if the fizz is not mealy then it is not unlawful. sent15: if the flurbiprofen grinds vertex then the fact that the disciple does grinds vertex is right. sent16: if the radiopacity is superjacent that it denationalizes Xenicidae is not false. sent17: the fizz is mealy if the flurbiprofen is unlawful but not elfin. sent18: the disciple is lawful thing that is mealy if it is not elfin. sent19: if the radiopacity does host then that it is a Monophysite is not wrong. sent20: that the disciple does not grind vertex hold. sent21: the flurbiprofen is unlawful but it is not carposporic. sent22: if the radiopacity is ontological it is superjacent. sent23: the fizz is not unlawful and conscripts sorrel if the disciple does grind vertex. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent20 -> int1: the disciple is non-carposporic thing that is unlawful.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the disciple is unlawful hold.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the flurbiprofen is unlawful but it is not elfin.; sent17 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__