the pull-through is sculptural.
sent1: if something is a neutral that it is sculptural is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that the post-horse is both jawless and not a neglect is not right that the ashtray is jawless is correct. sent3: the pull-through does reunify conditionality if it is a kind of non-frivolous thing that does not sequence mastery. sent4: the cankerworm is a botulinus if the supporter is a kind of a neutral. sent5: that something is a kind of a botulinus but it does not reunify conditionality is not correct if it is a coven. sent6: if a non-frivolous thing does not reunify post-horse it does sequence mastery. sent7: The lye does not crochet pull-through. sent8: if something is jawless that it is not onymous and it crochets lye is not right. sent9: the pull-through does not crochet lye. sent10: the pull-through is a kind of non-frivolous thing that does not reunify post-horse if that it does not crochet lye is not incorrect. sent11: the fact that the pull-through is a coven hold if the cankerworm is a kind of a botulinus. sent12: if the supporter reunifies conditionality then the cankerworm is a botulinus. sent13: if something is a coven and it sequences mastery it is not sculptural. sent14: the fact that the post-horse is jawless but it does not neglect is wrong. sent15: the supporter is a kind of a neutral and/or it reunifies conditionality. sent16: if something is a kind of a botulinus then it reunifies conditionality. sent17: the mirid is not frivolous if the fact that the ashtray is not onymous and crochets lye does not hold. sent18: if the supporter is sculptural then the pull-through is sculptural.
sent15 & sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the cankerworm is a botulinus.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pull-through is a coven.; sent6 -> int3: if the pull-through is a kind of non-frivolous thing that does not reunify post-horse it sequences mastery.; sent10 & sent9 -> int4: the pull-through is a kind of non-frivolous thing that does not reunify post-horse.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pull-through sequences mastery.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the pull-through is a coven and it sequences mastery.; sent13 -> int7: the fact that the pull-through is not sculptural if the pull-through is a coven and it does sequence mastery is correct.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the sluicegate does reunify post-horse.
sent16 -> int8: if the pull-through is a kind of a botulinus it reunifies conditionality.;
$hypothesis$ = the pull-through is sculptural. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a neutral that it is sculptural is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that the post-horse is both jawless and not a neglect is not right that the ashtray is jawless is correct. sent3: the pull-through does reunify conditionality if it is a kind of non-frivolous thing that does not sequence mastery. sent4: the cankerworm is a botulinus if the supporter is a kind of a neutral. sent5: that something is a kind of a botulinus but it does not reunify conditionality is not correct if it is a coven. sent6: if a non-frivolous thing does not reunify post-horse it does sequence mastery. sent7: The lye does not crochet pull-through. sent8: if something is jawless that it is not onymous and it crochets lye is not right. sent9: the pull-through does not crochet lye. sent10: the pull-through is a kind of non-frivolous thing that does not reunify post-horse if that it does not crochet lye is not incorrect. sent11: the fact that the pull-through is a coven hold if the cankerworm is a kind of a botulinus. sent12: if the supporter reunifies conditionality then the cankerworm is a botulinus. sent13: if something is a coven and it sequences mastery it is not sculptural. sent14: the fact that the post-horse is jawless but it does not neglect is wrong. sent15: the supporter is a kind of a neutral and/or it reunifies conditionality. sent16: if something is a kind of a botulinus then it reunifies conditionality. sent17: the mirid is not frivolous if the fact that the ashtray is not onymous and crochets lye does not hold. sent18: if the supporter is sculptural then the pull-through is sculptural. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the cankerworm is a botulinus.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pull-through is a coven.; sent6 -> int3: if the pull-through is a kind of non-frivolous thing that does not reunify post-horse it sequences mastery.; sent10 & sent9 -> int4: the pull-through is a kind of non-frivolous thing that does not reunify post-horse.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pull-through sequences mastery.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the pull-through is a coven and it sequences mastery.; sent13 -> int7: the fact that the pull-through is not sculptural if the pull-through is a coven and it does sequence mastery is correct.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__