the misleader is a Mobulidae.
sent1: that the bench does not thrombose thermoacidophile hold. sent2: the misleader spectates TAT. sent3: if the bench does not thrombose thermoacidophile then it is a kind of a backed and it awakes. sent4: something is a Mobulidae if it is a glint. sent5: that the thermoacidophile is a kind of energetic thing that is not wet is false if there exists something such that it is not a glint. sent6: that the rinse props orphaned and is not mass-spectrometric is not true if there is something such that it does back. sent7: that the misleader is energetic is not wrong. sent8: the pyrrhotite is a kind of a glint. sent9: the misleader is both not non-energetic and non-wet if the osteostracan is non-energetic. sent10: there is something such that that it is a literate is not incorrect. sent11: that the misleader is not a Mobulidae if the osteostracan is illiterate is correct. sent12: if that something does prop orphaned and is not mass-spectrometric is wrong then it is not a glint. sent13: if the osteostracan is energetic then the misleader is energetic. sent14: if there is something such that it is a kind of a literate then the osteostracan is energetic. sent15: if something is genic then the fact that it thromboses superoxide hold.
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the osteostracan is energetic.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the misleader is energetic thing that does not wet.; sent4 -> int3: the misleader is a Mobulidae if it is a glint.;
the misleader is not a kind of a Mobulidae.
sent12 -> int4: the rinse is not a glint if that it does prop orphaned and is not mass-spectrometric is not true.; sent3 & sent1 -> int5: the bench is a backed that awakes.; int5 -> int6: the bench is a backed.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a backed.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the fact that the rinse does prop orphaned but it is not mass-spectrometric is incorrect.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the rinse is not a glint.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a glint.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the fact that the thermoacidophile is energetic and non-wet is not true.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is energetic and it is not wet does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the misleader is a Mobulidae. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bench does not thrombose thermoacidophile hold. sent2: the misleader spectates TAT. sent3: if the bench does not thrombose thermoacidophile then it is a kind of a backed and it awakes. sent4: something is a Mobulidae if it is a glint. sent5: that the thermoacidophile is a kind of energetic thing that is not wet is false if there exists something such that it is not a glint. sent6: that the rinse props orphaned and is not mass-spectrometric is not true if there is something such that it does back. sent7: that the misleader is energetic is not wrong. sent8: the pyrrhotite is a kind of a glint. sent9: the misleader is both not non-energetic and non-wet if the osteostracan is non-energetic. sent10: there is something such that that it is a literate is not incorrect. sent11: that the misleader is not a Mobulidae if the osteostracan is illiterate is correct. sent12: if that something does prop orphaned and is not mass-spectrometric is wrong then it is not a glint. sent13: if the osteostracan is energetic then the misleader is energetic. sent14: if there is something such that it is a kind of a literate then the osteostracan is energetic. sent15: if something is genic then the fact that it thromboses superoxide hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the osteostracan is energetic.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the misleader is energetic thing that does not wet.; sent4 -> int3: the misleader is a Mobulidae if it is a glint.; __UNKNOWN__