the technical and the jurisprudentialness occurs if the clashing does not occur.
sent1: if the circularization does not occur then the fact that the surge occurs and the rekindling grope happens is not true. sent2: the possession does not occur if the fact that both the surging and the rekindling grope happens is not correct. sent3: the alibiing Rhone and the penalty occurs if the technical does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the technical and the clash happens does not hold then the undulatoriness does not occur. sent5: if the osseousness happens the meagerness occurs. sent6: the jurisprudentialness occurs. sent7: the alibiing Xenophon happens. sent8: if the jurisprudentialness does not occur the fact that the technicalness and the clashing happens is not right. sent9: that the anginalness occurs leads to that the alibiing premeditation does not occur and the jurisprudentialness does not occur. sent10: if the meagerness and the counterblast occurs then the circularization does not occur. sent11: both the wild and the anginalness happens if the fact that the possession does not occur is right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the technicalness does not occur.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the alibiing Rhone and the penalty happens.; int1 -> int2: the penalty happens.;
that the undulatoriness does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = the technical and the jurisprudentialness occurs if the clashing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the circularization does not occur then the fact that the surge occurs and the rekindling grope happens is not true. sent2: the possession does not occur if the fact that both the surging and the rekindling grope happens is not correct. sent3: the alibiing Rhone and the penalty occurs if the technical does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the technical and the clash happens does not hold then the undulatoriness does not occur. sent5: if the osseousness happens the meagerness occurs. sent6: the jurisprudentialness occurs. sent7: the alibiing Xenophon happens. sent8: if the jurisprudentialness does not occur the fact that the technicalness and the clashing happens is not right. sent9: that the anginalness occurs leads to that the alibiing premeditation does not occur and the jurisprudentialness does not occur. sent10: if the meagerness and the counterblast occurs then the circularization does not occur. sent11: both the wild and the anginalness happens if the fact that the possession does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the technicalness does not occur.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the alibiing Rhone and the penalty happens.; int1 -> int2: the penalty happens.; __UNKNOWN__