the fact that there is something such that if it scouts patzer then it is not vibrational and does sniff isoflurane does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does scout patzer then it is vibrational and it sniffs isoflurane. sent2: if the betel is a kind of a Azaleastrum then it does not empty Nike and it is vibrational. sent3: there is something such that if it consolidates T it is not a dietary and it is pianistic. sent4: something is not translunar but it does scout patzer if it is a kind of a Neritidae. sent5: there is something such that if it is a tropics then it is not a cross-examination and trams. sent6: if the betel scouts patzer it is not vibrational. sent7: there exists something such that if it is polar it is not a dockyard and it is a kind of a Azaleastrum. sent8: the betel is not vibrational but etiological if it is sentient. sent9: the betel is not vibrational but it sniffs isoflurane if it does scout patzer. sent10: if the betel scouts patzer it does not scout betel and it does scout Ziphiidae. sent11: if the betel does scout patzer then it is not quadrupedal and it does verbalize. sent12: there exists something such that if it does scout patzer it is not vibrational. sent13: the betel does not scout Rhizophora and consolidates T if it does scout concentration. sent14: there exists something such that if it scouts patzer it sniffs isoflurane. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Capitonidae then it is not less and does dampen. sent16: if the betel is a kerion it does not map and it is an illustrator. sent17: the betel does not sniff jammer and damascenes if that it does empty flagpole is not false. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that it does scout concentration is right then it does not consolidate perplexity and is a miscarriage.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
if the betel is a kind of a Neritidae then it is not translunar and it does scout patzer.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it scouts patzer then it is not vibrational and does sniff isoflurane does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does scout patzer then it is vibrational and it sniffs isoflurane. sent2: if the betel is a kind of a Azaleastrum then it does not empty Nike and it is vibrational. sent3: there is something such that if it consolidates T it is not a dietary and it is pianistic. sent4: something is not translunar but it does scout patzer if it is a kind of a Neritidae. sent5: there is something such that if it is a tropics then it is not a cross-examination and trams. sent6: if the betel scouts patzer it is not vibrational. sent7: there exists something such that if it is polar it is not a dockyard and it is a kind of a Azaleastrum. sent8: the betel is not vibrational but etiological if it is sentient. sent9: the betel is not vibrational but it sniffs isoflurane if it does scout patzer. sent10: if the betel scouts patzer it does not scout betel and it does scout Ziphiidae. sent11: if the betel does scout patzer then it is not quadrupedal and it does verbalize. sent12: there exists something such that if it does scout patzer it is not vibrational. sent13: the betel does not scout Rhizophora and consolidates T if it does scout concentration. sent14: there exists something such that if it scouts patzer it sniffs isoflurane. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Capitonidae then it is not less and does dampen. sent16: if the betel is a kerion it does not map and it is an illustrator. sent17: the betel does not sniff jammer and damascenes if that it does empty flagpole is not false. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that it does scout concentration is right then it does not consolidate perplexity and is a miscarriage. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__