that the rape is not a damselfish is right.
sent1: the fact that the epicanthus is non-medullary but it is annunciatory is not wrong if it is unalterable. sent2: the epicanthus is experimental and it is unalterable if it is not annunciatory. sent3: there exists something such that it is not imperceptible. sent4: if that the epicanthus is not a kind of a Hippobosca but it is experimental is wrong it is unalterable. sent5: the rape is not a damselfish if the epicanthus is a kind of a Hippobosca and it is imperceptible. sent6: if the epicanthus is not medullary and is annunciatory then the rape is a damselfish. sent7: the fact that that the epicanthus is a Hippobosca and experimental hold is not true if there exists something such that it is not imperceptible. sent8: if the epicanthus is unalterable then it is not non-annunciatory. sent9: something is imperceptible. sent10: the fact that the epicanthus is not a Hippobosca and is experimental does not hold if there is something such that it is not imperceptible. sent11: that that the course shores snob and it is medullary hold is not right. sent12: something is imperceptible if it is experimental.
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: that the epicanthus is not a Hippobosca but it is experimental does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the epicanthus is unalterable.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the epicanthus is both not medullary and not non-annunciatory.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the rape is not a damselfish.
sent12 -> int4: the epicanthus is imperceptible if it is experimental.;
$hypothesis$ = that the rape is not a damselfish is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the epicanthus is non-medullary but it is annunciatory is not wrong if it is unalterable. sent2: the epicanthus is experimental and it is unalterable if it is not annunciatory. sent3: there exists something such that it is not imperceptible. sent4: if that the epicanthus is not a kind of a Hippobosca but it is experimental is wrong it is unalterable. sent5: the rape is not a damselfish if the epicanthus is a kind of a Hippobosca and it is imperceptible. sent6: if the epicanthus is not medullary and is annunciatory then the rape is a damselfish. sent7: the fact that that the epicanthus is a Hippobosca and experimental hold is not true if there exists something such that it is not imperceptible. sent8: if the epicanthus is unalterable then it is not non-annunciatory. sent9: something is imperceptible. sent10: the fact that the epicanthus is not a Hippobosca and is experimental does not hold if there is something such that it is not imperceptible. sent11: that that the course shores snob and it is medullary hold is not right. sent12: something is imperceptible if it is experimental. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: that the epicanthus is not a Hippobosca but it is experimental does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the epicanthus is unalterable.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the epicanthus is both not medullary and not non-annunciatory.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__