there exists something such that if it is not a graver the fact that it demagnetizes viscountcy and it is a coldcream is right.
sent1: the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a graver it demagnetizes viscountcy and is a coldcream is not wrong. sent2: the G-man is a coldcream if that it is a graver is not true. sent3: something does wail recompense and it is spectroscopic if it is not a sadist. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a graver then it is a coldcream. sent5: if the G-man is not a graver it demagnetizes viscountcy and is a kind of a coldcream. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a graver it demagnetizes viscountcy.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a sadist hold it wails recompense and is spectroscopic.
sent3 -> int1: the goitrogen does wail recompense and it is spectroscopic if it is not a sadist.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a graver the fact that it demagnetizes viscountcy and it is a coldcream is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a graver it demagnetizes viscountcy and is a coldcream is not wrong. sent2: the G-man is a coldcream if that it is a graver is not true. sent3: something does wail recompense and it is spectroscopic if it is not a sadist. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a graver then it is a coldcream. sent5: if the G-man is not a graver it demagnetizes viscountcy and is a kind of a coldcream. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a graver it demagnetizes viscountcy. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__