if the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy then that the fact that the Sculptor is not a wild and does not encourage hold is not correct.
sent1: the phosgene does not receive and is not lengthwise if there is something such that that it is a patience is not wrong. sent2: if the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy then the fact that the Sculptor is a kind of a wild and does not encourage is false. sent3: if the phosgene lobs dramaturgy then the fact that the Sculptor is not a wild and does not encourage is wrong. sent4: if the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy the Sculptor is not wild and it does not encourage. sent5: if the Sculptor is a wild and does not encourage the phosgene lobs dramaturgy. sent6: something does not lob dramaturgy and is a kind of a patience if it does not lob Arhus. sent7: if the phosgene does not encourage then the fact that the Sculptor is not a wild and it does not lob dramaturgy is wrong. sent8: the Sculptor does not encourage. sent9: the Sculptor does not lob dramaturgy and does not encourage. sent10: if the Sculptor is not wild but it does encourage the phosgene lobs dramaturgy. sent11: if the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy then the fact that the Sculptor is not a kind of a wild but it encourages is false. sent12: the fact that the Sculptor is not a wild but it does encourage is not right. sent13: that the phosgene is non-wild is not incorrect. sent14: the warrigal is not a lawrencium and it is not bladdery. sent15: the phosgene is non-right thing that is non-calcic. sent16: if that the Sculptor is a kind of non-wild thing that does not encourage hold the phosgene lobs dramaturgy. sent17: something does not lob Arhus if the fact that it does not brazen and it is not a verge is false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Sculptor is not a wild and it does not encourage.; sent16 & assump2 -> int1: the phosgene does lob dramaturgy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the Sculptor is not a wild and it does not encourage is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the phosgene does not receive and it is not lengthwise.
sent6 -> int4: if the rattan does not lob Arhus it does not lob dramaturgy and is a kind of a patience.; sent17 -> int5: the rattan does not lob Arhus if that it is a kind of non-brazen thing that is not a verge is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = if the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy then that the fact that the Sculptor is not a wild and does not encourage hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the phosgene does not receive and is not lengthwise if there is something such that that it is a patience is not wrong. sent2: if the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy then the fact that the Sculptor is a kind of a wild and does not encourage is false. sent3: if the phosgene lobs dramaturgy then the fact that the Sculptor is not a wild and does not encourage is wrong. sent4: if the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy the Sculptor is not wild and it does not encourage. sent5: if the Sculptor is a wild and does not encourage the phosgene lobs dramaturgy. sent6: something does not lob dramaturgy and is a kind of a patience if it does not lob Arhus. sent7: if the phosgene does not encourage then the fact that the Sculptor is not a wild and it does not lob dramaturgy is wrong. sent8: the Sculptor does not encourage. sent9: the Sculptor does not lob dramaturgy and does not encourage. sent10: if the Sculptor is not wild but it does encourage the phosgene lobs dramaturgy. sent11: if the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy then the fact that the Sculptor is not a kind of a wild but it encourages is false. sent12: the fact that the Sculptor is not a wild but it does encourage is not right. sent13: that the phosgene is non-wild is not incorrect. sent14: the warrigal is not a lawrencium and it is not bladdery. sent15: the phosgene is non-right thing that is non-calcic. sent16: if that the Sculptor is a kind of non-wild thing that does not encourage hold the phosgene lobs dramaturgy. sent17: something does not lob Arhus if the fact that it does not brazen and it is not a verge is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Sculptor is not a wild and it does not encourage.; sent16 & assump2 -> int1: the phosgene does lob dramaturgy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phosgene does not lob dramaturgy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the Sculptor is not a wild and it does not encourage is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__