the sugar is not a kind of a enginery and it is not a Juniperus.
sent1: the sugar is not a Juniperus if the fact that the ectomorph does not parse is correct. sent2: the ectomorph is not a enginery. sent3: the ectomorph is not a kind of a shoot if it does command handcar and parses. sent4: there is something such that it is not a Juniperus. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it does not dirty is not false. sent6: the sugar is not a Juniperus. sent7: the ectomorph is a kind of a girl that stables acquittance. sent8: the sugar is not a enginery and not a Juniperus if the ectomorph does not parse. sent9: the radon is a enginery that is gastric. sent10: the biochemist shoots and commands handcar if the pharmacologist is not a colored. sent11: if something is not dirty the fact that it is not a enginery and it is not a Juniperus does not hold. sent12: if the sugar is a enginery and it does shoot then it does not command handcar. sent13: there exists something such that it dirties. sent14: if the sugar does not command handcar that the ectomorph is not a kind of a Juniperus is not incorrect. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not dirty the ectomorph does command handcar. sent16: the hedge is gastric and does not risk conflict. sent17: the ectomorph is spatiotemporal. sent18: the sugar does not parse. sent19: if the ectomorph does not dirty and does not parse the sugar does not dirty. sent20: the ectomorph is umbelliferous. sent21: the ectomorph shoots. sent22: the firelight is a kind of a shoot. sent23: the sugar commands handcar if there is something such that it is not a Juniperus.
sent5 & sent15 -> int1: the ectomorph commands handcar.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ectomorph parses.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ectomorph does command handcar and parses.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the ectomorph is not a shoot is not incorrect.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the ectomorph does not parse.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sugar is not a enginery and it is not a Juniperus is not right.
sent11 -> int6: the fact that the sugar is not a kind of a enginery and it is not a Juniperus is false if it is not dirty.; sent16 -> int7: something is gastric but it does not risk conflict.;
$hypothesis$ = the sugar is not a kind of a enginery and it is not a Juniperus. ; $context$ = sent1: the sugar is not a Juniperus if the fact that the ectomorph does not parse is correct. sent2: the ectomorph is not a enginery. sent3: the ectomorph is not a kind of a shoot if it does command handcar and parses. sent4: there is something such that it is not a Juniperus. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it does not dirty is not false. sent6: the sugar is not a Juniperus. sent7: the ectomorph is a kind of a girl that stables acquittance. sent8: the sugar is not a enginery and not a Juniperus if the ectomorph does not parse. sent9: the radon is a enginery that is gastric. sent10: the biochemist shoots and commands handcar if the pharmacologist is not a colored. sent11: if something is not dirty the fact that it is not a enginery and it is not a Juniperus does not hold. sent12: if the sugar is a enginery and it does shoot then it does not command handcar. sent13: there exists something such that it dirties. sent14: if the sugar does not command handcar that the ectomorph is not a kind of a Juniperus is not incorrect. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not dirty the ectomorph does command handcar. sent16: the hedge is gastric and does not risk conflict. sent17: the ectomorph is spatiotemporal. sent18: the sugar does not parse. sent19: if the ectomorph does not dirty and does not parse the sugar does not dirty. sent20: the ectomorph is umbelliferous. sent21: the ectomorph shoots. sent22: the firelight is a kind of a shoot. sent23: the sugar commands handcar if there is something such that it is not a Juniperus. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent15 -> int1: the ectomorph commands handcar.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ectomorph parses.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ectomorph does command handcar and parses.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the ectomorph is not a shoot is not incorrect.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the ectomorph does not parse.; int5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__