there exists something such that if it is a buttonhook and is not a proconvertin then the fact that it is not a stoicism is correct.
sent1: if the OPV is a kind of a corollary that does not bilk demythologization the fact that it is not particulate is not false. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of unnoticeable thing that does not extricate lectin then it does not dwindle. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a buttonhook that is a proconvertin hold that it is not a kind of a stoicism is correct. sent4: the cuprite does not extricate Simarouba if it is cannibalistic and it is not theoretical. sent5: there exists something such that if it does skid raging and does not roughen Stilton then it does not extricate glove. sent6: the cuprite is not a kind of a stoicism if it is a buttonhook and it is not a kind of a proconvertin. sent7: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Polish and it is not same is not false it is not repetitive is not false. sent8: if something is a Ormandy that is not a kind of a queue then it is not a kind of a buttonhook. sent9: if the cuprite is a kind of a buttonhook that is a proconvertin it is not a kind of a stoicism. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a SACLANT and it is not a kind of an equatorial it is not an overlap. sent11: the cuprite does not roughen Xanthosoma if it is a kingbolt and it is not a kind of a buttonhook. sent12: there is something such that if it is a buttonhook and not a proconvertin then it is a stoicism. sent13: if the fact that the lapel is a kind of nilpotent thing that is not on-line is not incorrect then it is not innumerate. sent14: the cuprite is not unshapely if it is a Landau that is not a buttonhook. sent15: if the cuprite is a kind of a cul but it is not a kind of a weed that it is not a stoicism is not wrong. sent16: if the cuprite is a kind of a buttonhook but it is not indiscreet then it is not a bathrobe. sent17: if something is a kind of Britannic thing that is not a Durer it does not extricate plainness. sent18: the cuprite is a stoicism if it is a buttonhook and is not a proconvertin. sent19: if the cuprite is a stoicism but it does not skid Romansh then the fact that it is not hydric is not false. sent20: there is something such that if it is not non-frictional but nonrepetitive it does not extricate tracer.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
the EU is not a buttonhook if it is both a Ormandy and not a queue.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a buttonhook and is not a proconvertin then the fact that it is not a stoicism is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the OPV is a kind of a corollary that does not bilk demythologization the fact that it is not particulate is not false. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of unnoticeable thing that does not extricate lectin then it does not dwindle. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a buttonhook that is a proconvertin hold that it is not a kind of a stoicism is correct. sent4: the cuprite does not extricate Simarouba if it is cannibalistic and it is not theoretical. sent5: there exists something such that if it does skid raging and does not roughen Stilton then it does not extricate glove. sent6: the cuprite is not a kind of a stoicism if it is a buttonhook and it is not a kind of a proconvertin. sent7: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Polish and it is not same is not false it is not repetitive is not false. sent8: if something is a Ormandy that is not a kind of a queue then it is not a kind of a buttonhook. sent9: if the cuprite is a kind of a buttonhook that is a proconvertin it is not a kind of a stoicism. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a SACLANT and it is not a kind of an equatorial it is not an overlap. sent11: the cuprite does not roughen Xanthosoma if it is a kingbolt and it is not a kind of a buttonhook. sent12: there is something such that if it is a buttonhook and not a proconvertin then it is a stoicism. sent13: if the fact that the lapel is a kind of nilpotent thing that is not on-line is not incorrect then it is not innumerate. sent14: the cuprite is not unshapely if it is a Landau that is not a buttonhook. sent15: if the cuprite is a kind of a cul but it is not a kind of a weed that it is not a stoicism is not wrong. sent16: if the cuprite is a kind of a buttonhook but it is not indiscreet then it is not a bathrobe. sent17: if something is a kind of Britannic thing that is not a Durer it does not extricate plainness. sent18: the cuprite is a stoicism if it is a buttonhook and is not a proconvertin. sent19: if the cuprite is a stoicism but it does not skid Romansh then the fact that it is not hydric is not false. sent20: there is something such that if it is not non-frictional but nonrepetitive it does not extricate tracer. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__