the sporophyll is not a barker.
sent1: the sporophyll does not sensitize bended or it is a kind of a progymnosperm or both if there exists something such that it is not a flirt. sent2: the baroreceptor is not an accumulation. sent3: if that the transaminase does not contribute sporophyll and rehabilitates is not wrong the baroreceptor contribute sporophyll. sent4: something does not contribute sporophyll but it rehabilitates if it is serious. sent5: the baroreceptor is a repartee if the transaminase is a progymnosperm. sent6: the sporophyll is not an accumulation and is a repartee if there exists something such that it is not a barker. sent7: the sporophyll is executive and it is a flirt. sent8: if something is not a progymnosperm it is both an accumulation and a repartee. sent9: if the baroreceptor is not a kind of an accumulation it is restrictive and it does push. sent10: if something cleaves but it does not sensitize privacy then the transaminase does japan swarm. sent11: something is a progymnosperm if either it does not sensitize bended or it is a kind of a progymnosperm or both. sent12: if the transaminase is not a fingerpost it is patriarchal and it is a kind of a flirt. sent13: there exists something such that it does cleave and does not sensitize privacy. sent14: there exists something such that it is a repartee. sent15: if something does contribute sporophyll it is not a kind of a barker. sent16: the forge is both not a flirt and not fisheye. sent17: the sporophyll is not a barker if something is a push and it is a repartee. sent18: something does bias if it is not an accumulation and it is a repartee. sent19: the transaminase is serious if it does japan swarm.
sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the baroreceptor is restrictive and it is a push.; int1 -> int2: the baroreceptor pushes.;
the sporophyll is both a progymnosperm and a biased.
sent11 -> int3: if the sporophyll either does not sensitize bended or is a progymnosperm or both then it is a progymnosperm.; sent16 -> int4: the forge is not a flirt.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a flirt.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the sporophyll does not sensitize bended and/or it is a progymnosperm.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the sporophyll is a progymnosperm.; sent18 -> int8: if the sporophyll is not an accumulation but it is a repartee then it biases.; sent15 -> int9: the baroreceptor is not a barker if it contributes sporophyll.; sent4 -> int10: the transaminase does not contribute sporophyll and rehabilitates if it is serious.; sent13 & sent10 -> int11: the fact that the transaminase does japan swarm hold.; sent19 & int11 -> int12: the transaminase is serious.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the transaminase does not contribute sporophyll but it does rehabilitate.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the baroreceptor contributes sporophyll.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the baroreceptor is not a kind of a barker.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is not a barker.; int16 & sent6 -> int17: the sporophyll is not a kind of an accumulation but it is a kind of a repartee.; int8 & int17 -> int18: the sporophyll is a biased.; int7 & int18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sporophyll is not a barker. ; $context$ = sent1: the sporophyll does not sensitize bended or it is a kind of a progymnosperm or both if there exists something such that it is not a flirt. sent2: the baroreceptor is not an accumulation. sent3: if that the transaminase does not contribute sporophyll and rehabilitates is not wrong the baroreceptor contribute sporophyll. sent4: something does not contribute sporophyll but it rehabilitates if it is serious. sent5: the baroreceptor is a repartee if the transaminase is a progymnosperm. sent6: the sporophyll is not an accumulation and is a repartee if there exists something such that it is not a barker. sent7: the sporophyll is executive and it is a flirt. sent8: if something is not a progymnosperm it is both an accumulation and a repartee. sent9: if the baroreceptor is not a kind of an accumulation it is restrictive and it does push. sent10: if something cleaves but it does not sensitize privacy then the transaminase does japan swarm. sent11: something is a progymnosperm if either it does not sensitize bended or it is a kind of a progymnosperm or both. sent12: if the transaminase is not a fingerpost it is patriarchal and it is a kind of a flirt. sent13: there exists something such that it does cleave and does not sensitize privacy. sent14: there exists something such that it is a repartee. sent15: if something does contribute sporophyll it is not a kind of a barker. sent16: the forge is both not a flirt and not fisheye. sent17: the sporophyll is not a barker if something is a push and it is a repartee. sent18: something does bias if it is not an accumulation and it is a repartee. sent19: the transaminase is serious if it does japan swarm. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent2 -> int1: the baroreceptor is restrictive and it is a push.; int1 -> int2: the baroreceptor pushes.; __UNKNOWN__