the recombining BMDO does not occur and the no does not occur.
sent1: not the prelacy but the oligarchicness occurs if the consultation occurs. sent2: the souring does not occur if the agonizing occurs. sent3: the recombining Leontodon occurs. sent4: that the tweedling lateness occurs but the recombining Leontodon does not occur is false if the annalisticness does not occur. sent5: the gratifying occurs. sent6: the fact that the recombining Leontodon and the non-annalisticness happens does not hold if the beachhead does not occur. sent7: both the experimentalness and the gratifying occurs. sent8: the tweedling lateness occurs if that the fact that the recombining Leontodon happens and the annalisticness does not occur is right does not hold. sent9: the beachhead does not occur if the prelacy does not occur but the oligarchicness occurs. sent10: the tweedling lateness occurs if the fact that the annalisticness occurs but the recombining BMDO does not occur is not correct. sent11: if the annalisticness and the recombining BMDO happens the recombining Leontodon does not occur. sent12: the beachhead happens. sent13: if the beachhead does not occur the annalisticness occurs and the recombining Leontodon happens. sent14: that both the jugging and the basiscopicness happens prevents that the filing happens. sent15: the rinse happens. sent16: the trading happens. sent17: that the recombining BMDO does not occur and the no does not occur is false if the tweedling lateness does not occur. sent18: both the noness and the beachhead occurs if the oligarchicness does not occur. sent19: the tweedling lateness occurs. sent20: both the tweedling lateness and the annalisticness happens. sent21: the quaver happens if the tweedling lateness happens.
sent20 -> int1: the annalisticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recombining BMDO occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the annalisticness occurs and the recombining BMDO occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the recombining Leontodon does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the recombining BMDO does not occur.;
the quaver occurs and the branchialness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the recombining BMDO does not occur and the no does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: not the prelacy but the oligarchicness occurs if the consultation occurs. sent2: the souring does not occur if the agonizing occurs. sent3: the recombining Leontodon occurs. sent4: that the tweedling lateness occurs but the recombining Leontodon does not occur is false if the annalisticness does not occur. sent5: the gratifying occurs. sent6: the fact that the recombining Leontodon and the non-annalisticness happens does not hold if the beachhead does not occur. sent7: both the experimentalness and the gratifying occurs. sent8: the tweedling lateness occurs if that the fact that the recombining Leontodon happens and the annalisticness does not occur is right does not hold. sent9: the beachhead does not occur if the prelacy does not occur but the oligarchicness occurs. sent10: the tweedling lateness occurs if the fact that the annalisticness occurs but the recombining BMDO does not occur is not correct. sent11: if the annalisticness and the recombining BMDO happens the recombining Leontodon does not occur. sent12: the beachhead happens. sent13: if the beachhead does not occur the annalisticness occurs and the recombining Leontodon happens. sent14: that both the jugging and the basiscopicness happens prevents that the filing happens. sent15: the rinse happens. sent16: the trading happens. sent17: that the recombining BMDO does not occur and the no does not occur is false if the tweedling lateness does not occur. sent18: both the noness and the beachhead occurs if the oligarchicness does not occur. sent19: the tweedling lateness occurs. sent20: both the tweedling lateness and the annalisticness happens. sent21: the quaver happens if the tweedling lateness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the annalisticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the recombining BMDO occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the annalisticness occurs and the recombining BMDO occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the recombining Leontodon does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the recombining BMDO does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__