the bootlicker is not a render and not microsomal if the neurolinguist is minimal.
sent1: something does ferment and it is angiocarpic. sent2: the bootlicker does plummet if there is something such that it is a solvent and it is minimal. sent3: the neurolinguist is both not a payback and not microelectronics if there is something such that it is not a argasid. sent4: that the winepress renders hold. sent5: if something does plummet then it is not a render and is not microsomal. sent6: the ferryman is not microsomal and it is not a ferment. sent7: if something pages then it is both not a Hylophylax and a vibration. sent8: something is not minty and is a kind of an honor if it twines Darfur. sent9: the bootlicker is not a kind of a render and is microsomal if the fact that it does plummet is not false. sent10: the bootlicker does not render if the neurolinguist is minimal. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a referent and it is an incrimination. sent12: if a payback is not microelectronics then it is solvent. sent13: the bootlicker is not a payback and is solvent if the neurolinguist is microsomal. sent14: something that is not a payback and is not microelectronics is not a solvent. sent15: if something is not a payback but it is microelectronics then the fact that it is a solvent is right. sent16: the Tarzan is a render and it is an honor. sent17: there exists something such that it is minimal. sent18: the bootlicker is not a render and is not a kind of a Icelandic. sent19: the neurolinguist is non-quartan thing that does not bark wampum. sent20: if the fowler is minimal then it is not a kind of a Stoic. sent21: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a argasid is not false. sent22: the bootlicker does not burn but it is a kind of a adrenergic. sent23: the fact that something is not a render is right if it does plummet. sent24: something is a argasid. sent25: there is something such that it is a solvent.
sent21 & sent3 -> int1: the neurolinguist is not a payback and is not microelectronics.; sent14 -> int2: the neurolinguist is a solvent if it is both not a payback and not microelectronics.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the neurolinguist is a solvent.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neurolinguist is minimal.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the neurolinguist is solvent and it is minimal.; int4 -> int5: there are solvent and minimal things.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the bootlicker does plummet.; sent5 -> int7: if the bootlicker plummets it does not render and it is not microsomal.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bootlicker does not render and it is not microsomal.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bootlicker is not a render and not microsomal if the neurolinguist is minimal. ; $context$ = sent1: something does ferment and it is angiocarpic. sent2: the bootlicker does plummet if there is something such that it is a solvent and it is minimal. sent3: the neurolinguist is both not a payback and not microelectronics if there is something such that it is not a argasid. sent4: that the winepress renders hold. sent5: if something does plummet then it is not a render and is not microsomal. sent6: the ferryman is not microsomal and it is not a ferment. sent7: if something pages then it is both not a Hylophylax and a vibration. sent8: something is not minty and is a kind of an honor if it twines Darfur. sent9: the bootlicker is not a kind of a render and is microsomal if the fact that it does plummet is not false. sent10: the bootlicker does not render if the neurolinguist is minimal. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a referent and it is an incrimination. sent12: if a payback is not microelectronics then it is solvent. sent13: the bootlicker is not a payback and is solvent if the neurolinguist is microsomal. sent14: something that is not a payback and is not microelectronics is not a solvent. sent15: if something is not a payback but it is microelectronics then the fact that it is a solvent is right. sent16: the Tarzan is a render and it is an honor. sent17: there exists something such that it is minimal. sent18: the bootlicker is not a render and is not a kind of a Icelandic. sent19: the neurolinguist is non-quartan thing that does not bark wampum. sent20: if the fowler is minimal then it is not a kind of a Stoic. sent21: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a argasid is not false. sent22: the bootlicker does not burn but it is a kind of a adrenergic. sent23: the fact that something is not a render is right if it does plummet. sent24: something is a argasid. sent25: there is something such that it is a solvent. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent3 -> int1: the neurolinguist is not a payback and is not microelectronics.; sent14 -> int2: the neurolinguist is a solvent if it is both not a payback and not microelectronics.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the neurolinguist is a solvent.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neurolinguist is minimal.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the neurolinguist is solvent and it is minimal.; int4 -> int5: there are solvent and minimal things.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the bootlicker does plummet.; sent5 -> int7: if the bootlicker plummets it does not render and it is not microsomal.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bootlicker does not render and it is not microsomal.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__