the chandlery is not a crowd and is mensural.
sent1: something that is non-ontological a oblation does not snuff Ostyak. sent2: if something does not snuff Ostyak then it laces. sent3: the sheika does not snuff Ostyak if something is not ontological but it is a oblation. sent4: if the chandlery is both not ontological and a oblation then it does not snuff Ostyak. sent5: if a hemic thing is mensural the cittern is not ascetic. sent6: if the sheika is tannic and it does right Dowland the helm is not ascetic. sent7: the fact that something is both not a crowd and mensural is incorrect if it is a chubbiness. sent8: if the chandlery is not hemic it is ascetic and a chubbiness. sent9: the chandlery is mensural if that the Ostyak is not hemic and/or it is not ascetic is wrong. sent10: the fact that if the helm is not ascetic then that that the Ostyak is not hemic and/or it is not ascetic is incorrect is not wrong is not false. sent11: something is both a Albanian and a chubbiness if that it is not ascetic is not wrong. sent12: if the sheika is a chubbiness it is tannic and it does not right Dowland. sent13: the chandlery is not a oblation. sent14: that the chandlery is a laced is correct if it does not snuff Ostyak. sent15: the sheika is a chubbiness. sent16: something laces but it is not a crowd if it is not a subcontract. sent17: something is not hemic if either it snuffs Ostyak or it is not a laced or both. sent18: if something that is not ontological is not a kind of a oblation then it does not snuff Ostyak. sent19: the helm is not a subcontract. sent20: there is something such that it is not ontological and it is a kind of a oblation. sent21: the cittern does not patronize skincare if there exists something such that it is a laced and it is not a crowd. sent22: the fact that the helm is not mensural and/or is not ascetic is wrong if the chandlery is not ascetic. sent23: if the sheika is a kind of tannic thing that does not right Dowland the helm is not ascetic. sent24: the chandlery is not ontological and is not a oblation.
sent12 & sent15 -> int1: the sheika is tannic thing that does not right Dowland.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the helm is not ascetic.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the Ostyak is not hemic and/or it is not ascetic is wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the chandlery is mensural.; sent18 -> int5: if the chandlery is not ontological and it is not a oblation then it does not snuff Ostyak.; int5 & sent24 -> int6: the fact that the chandlery does not snuff Ostyak is true.;
the cittern is Albanian and does not patronize skincare.
sent11 -> int7: if the cittern is non-ascetic it is both Albanian and a chubbiness.; sent20 & sent3 -> int8: the sheika does not snuff Ostyak.; sent16 -> int9: if the helm is not a subcontract then it is a kind of a laced that is not a crowd.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: the helm is a laced that does not crowd.; int10 -> int11: something is a kind of a laced that is not a crowd.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the cittern does not patronize skincare.;
$hypothesis$ = the chandlery is not a crowd and is mensural. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is non-ontological a oblation does not snuff Ostyak. sent2: if something does not snuff Ostyak then it laces. sent3: the sheika does not snuff Ostyak if something is not ontological but it is a oblation. sent4: if the chandlery is both not ontological and a oblation then it does not snuff Ostyak. sent5: if a hemic thing is mensural the cittern is not ascetic. sent6: if the sheika is tannic and it does right Dowland the helm is not ascetic. sent7: the fact that something is both not a crowd and mensural is incorrect if it is a chubbiness. sent8: if the chandlery is not hemic it is ascetic and a chubbiness. sent9: the chandlery is mensural if that the Ostyak is not hemic and/or it is not ascetic is wrong. sent10: the fact that if the helm is not ascetic then that that the Ostyak is not hemic and/or it is not ascetic is incorrect is not wrong is not false. sent11: something is both a Albanian and a chubbiness if that it is not ascetic is not wrong. sent12: if the sheika is a chubbiness it is tannic and it does not right Dowland. sent13: the chandlery is not a oblation. sent14: that the chandlery is a laced is correct if it does not snuff Ostyak. sent15: the sheika is a chubbiness. sent16: something laces but it is not a crowd if it is not a subcontract. sent17: something is not hemic if either it snuffs Ostyak or it is not a laced or both. sent18: if something that is not ontological is not a kind of a oblation then it does not snuff Ostyak. sent19: the helm is not a subcontract. sent20: there is something such that it is not ontological and it is a kind of a oblation. sent21: the cittern does not patronize skincare if there exists something such that it is a laced and it is not a crowd. sent22: the fact that the helm is not mensural and/or is not ascetic is wrong if the chandlery is not ascetic. sent23: if the sheika is a kind of tannic thing that does not right Dowland the helm is not ascetic. sent24: the chandlery is not ontological and is not a oblation. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent15 -> int1: the sheika is tannic thing that does not right Dowland.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the helm is not ascetic.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the Ostyak is not hemic and/or it is not ascetic is wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the chandlery is mensural.; sent18 -> int5: if the chandlery is not ontological and it is not a oblation then it does not snuff Ostyak.; int5 & sent24 -> int6: the fact that the chandlery does not snuff Ostyak is true.; __UNKNOWN__