the control does not chance.
sent1: if something does not besot biquadrate it subrogates asphalt and it immobilizes. sent2: the palingenesis does subrogate asphalt and it exchanges. sent3: that the control is not big hold. sent4: something does immobilize if that it does not immobilize and is chalky is not correct. sent5: the capitol is not a foster-brother. sent6: if something that is not a foster-brother is not a quadric it is not a chance. sent7: the capitol is not a quadric. sent8: the control is a kind of a imperfective. sent9: the control does subrogate button-quail. sent10: the control is a kind of an empty if it lysogenizes Oriolus. sent11: if that something is chalky and does not immobilize is false it does bundle bologram. sent12: the control is a kind of a imperfective if it does not subrogate asphalt. sent13: that the control is not a chance is correct if the button-quail does immobilize and chance. sent14: the control is a kind of an empty that is ropy if it is not a regress. sent15: if the control does not subrogate asphalt then it is a imperfective and is not non-empty. sent16: the control does not subrogate asphalt. sent17: the hanging is not a chance. sent18: that the capitol is chalky but it does not immobilize is not correct if it does not besot biquadrate. sent19: if something does empty it does chance. sent20: The asphalt does not subrogate control. sent21: the carillon does not besot biquadrate.
sent15 & sent16 -> int1: the control is a imperfective and it is a kind of an empty.; int1 -> int2: the control does empty.; sent19 -> int3: if the control empties it is a kind of a chance.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the capitol is Palladian and does bundle bologram.
sent6 -> int4: if the capitol is not a foster-brother and it is not a kind of a quadric the fact that it does not chance is true.; sent5 & sent7 -> int5: the capitol is both not a foster-brother and not a quadric.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the capitol is not a chance.; sent11 -> int7: the capitol does bundle bologram if that it is chalky and it does not immobilize is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the control does not chance. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not besot biquadrate it subrogates asphalt and it immobilizes. sent2: the palingenesis does subrogate asphalt and it exchanges. sent3: that the control is not big hold. sent4: something does immobilize if that it does not immobilize and is chalky is not correct. sent5: the capitol is not a foster-brother. sent6: if something that is not a foster-brother is not a quadric it is not a chance. sent7: the capitol is not a quadric. sent8: the control is a kind of a imperfective. sent9: the control does subrogate button-quail. sent10: the control is a kind of an empty if it lysogenizes Oriolus. sent11: if that something is chalky and does not immobilize is false it does bundle bologram. sent12: the control is a kind of a imperfective if it does not subrogate asphalt. sent13: that the control is not a chance is correct if the button-quail does immobilize and chance. sent14: the control is a kind of an empty that is ropy if it is not a regress. sent15: if the control does not subrogate asphalt then it is a imperfective and is not non-empty. sent16: the control does not subrogate asphalt. sent17: the hanging is not a chance. sent18: that the capitol is chalky but it does not immobilize is not correct if it does not besot biquadrate. sent19: if something does empty it does chance. sent20: The asphalt does not subrogate control. sent21: the carillon does not besot biquadrate. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent16 -> int1: the control is a imperfective and it is a kind of an empty.; int1 -> int2: the control does empty.; sent19 -> int3: if the control empties it is a kind of a chance.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__