the Turk's-cap is not mutational.
sent1: there exists something such that it does mystify modillion. sent2: the gadgetry is dystopian thing that is synchronous. sent3: there is something such that it is side-to-side and philhellenic. sent4: the gadgetry is mutational. sent5: something does not jazz constructiveness and is not a trisomy. sent6: there exists something such that it is immunological. sent7: the Turk's-cap is not mutational if there is something such that the fact that it is a lowness and it is a kind of an epicenter is not correct. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not optical hold then that the worthy is a lowness and it is an epicenter is not right. sent9: if something is dystopian and is lobeliaceous the beggarman is not optical. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a lowness the Turk's-cap is not non-lobeliaceous and it is optical. sent11: the fact that the gadgetry is a kind of non-hard thing that is not greenhouse is wrong if the fact that something is not dystopian is not false. sent12: there exists something such that that it is not mutational and it is synchronous is wrong. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is both lobeliaceous and an epicenter is not right then that the worthy is non-mutational is true. sent14: the beggarman is not dystopian if there is something such that it is not synchronous. sent15: the worthy is a kind of a lowness and it is dystopian. sent16: the worthy is not synchronous if there exists something such that it is lobeliaceous. sent17: if there is something such that that the fact that it is not cursorial and it is not lobeliaceous is right is not correct then the gadgetry is lobeliaceous. sent18: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-electrostatic thing that is not side-to-side is false. sent19: the gadgetry is a kind of a futurist. sent20: there is something such that it does wrest misstatement. sent21: the gadgetry is synchronous and it is mutational. sent22: there exists something such that it does not wrest Henry. sent23: there exists something such that that it is not an epicenter but non-mutational does not hold. sent24: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is both non-cursorial and not lobeliaceous is correct is not true.
sent2 -> int1: the gadgetry is dystopian.; sent24 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the gadgetry is not lobeliaceous is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gadgetry is dystopian thing that is lobeliaceous.; int3 -> int4: something is dystopian and lobeliaceous.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the beggarman is not optical.; int5 -> int6: there are non-optical things.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the worthy is a lowness and an epicenter is false.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a kind of a lowness and it is an epicenter is wrong.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that that it is not hard and it is not a kind of a greenhouse is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the Turk's-cap is not mutational. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does mystify modillion. sent2: the gadgetry is dystopian thing that is synchronous. sent3: there is something such that it is side-to-side and philhellenic. sent4: the gadgetry is mutational. sent5: something does not jazz constructiveness and is not a trisomy. sent6: there exists something such that it is immunological. sent7: the Turk's-cap is not mutational if there is something such that the fact that it is a lowness and it is a kind of an epicenter is not correct. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not optical hold then that the worthy is a lowness and it is an epicenter is not right. sent9: if something is dystopian and is lobeliaceous the beggarman is not optical. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a lowness the Turk's-cap is not non-lobeliaceous and it is optical. sent11: the fact that the gadgetry is a kind of non-hard thing that is not greenhouse is wrong if the fact that something is not dystopian is not false. sent12: there exists something such that that it is not mutational and it is synchronous is wrong. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is both lobeliaceous and an epicenter is not right then that the worthy is non-mutational is true. sent14: the beggarman is not dystopian if there is something such that it is not synchronous. sent15: the worthy is a kind of a lowness and it is dystopian. sent16: the worthy is not synchronous if there exists something such that it is lobeliaceous. sent17: if there is something such that that the fact that it is not cursorial and it is not lobeliaceous is right is not correct then the gadgetry is lobeliaceous. sent18: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-electrostatic thing that is not side-to-side is false. sent19: the gadgetry is a kind of a futurist. sent20: there is something such that it does wrest misstatement. sent21: the gadgetry is synchronous and it is mutational. sent22: there exists something such that it does not wrest Henry. sent23: there exists something such that that it is not an epicenter but non-mutational does not hold. sent24: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is both non-cursorial and not lobeliaceous is correct is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the gadgetry is dystopian.; sent24 & sent17 -> int2: the fact that the gadgetry is not lobeliaceous is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gadgetry is dystopian thing that is lobeliaceous.; int3 -> int4: something is dystopian and lobeliaceous.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the beggarman is not optical.; int5 -> int6: there are non-optical things.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the fact that the worthy is a lowness and an epicenter is false.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is a kind of a lowness and it is an epicenter is wrong.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__