the fact that the lap is a dumdum but it is not a bustling is incorrect.
sent1: the lap is a dumdum. sent2: if the lap is pleasant or is calcicolous or both then it is not a dumdum. sent3: the cannonball is not a blanketed if it does not decolonize varicocele and it does not underwrite. sent4: the anaspid is calcicolous if the synagogue is not a dumdum. sent5: the anaspid is calcicolous. sent6: something does not galumph if that it does not differentiate and it is calcicolous does not hold. sent7: if the synagogue is not a dumdum then the anaspid is not a dumdum but calcicolous. sent8: the fact that something does not differentiate but it is calcicolous is not right if it does not decolonize Pandionidae. sent9: the lap is a dumdum if the anaspid is not a dumdum. sent10: the tarpaulin is not a kind of a daredevilry if the cannonball either is not a daredevilry or does not scram A-list or both. sent11: if the anaspid is not a dumdum then the lap is a dumdum but it does not bustle. sent12: the cannonball either is not a daredevilry or does not scram A-list or both if it is not a kind of a blanketed. sent13: the cannonball does not decolonize varicocele and it does not underwrite. sent14: if the synagogue is actable then it is not pleasant. sent15: the gunman scrams favor and/or it is actable. sent16: something does not decolonize Pandionidae if that it decolonize Pandionidae and it is not a cemetery does not hold. sent17: that the synagogue is pleasant is not false if it galumphs. sent18: the synagogue does galumph. sent19: if the synagogue is not unactable and/or is a dumdum it is not pleasant. sent20: the synagogue is not unpleasant and/or it is calcicolous. sent21: if there is something such that it is not a daredevilry then that that the anaspid does decolonize Pandionidae and is not a cemetery is not false does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the synagogue is a dumdum.; assump1 -> int1: the synagogue is actable or is a dumdum or both.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the synagogue is not pleasant.; sent17 & sent18 -> int3: the synagogue is pleasant.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the synagogue is not a dumdum.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the anaspid is not a dumdum but it is calcicolous.; int6 -> int7: the anaspid is not a dumdum.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the lap is a kind of a dumdum and does not bustle is not right.
sent6 -> int8: the anaspid does not galumph if the fact that it does not differentiate and it is calcicolous is wrong.; sent8 -> int9: if the anaspid does not decolonize Pandionidae then the fact that it does not differentiate and it is calcicolous is false.; sent16 -> int10: if that the anaspid does decolonize Pandionidae but it is not a kind of a cemetery is false it does not decolonize Pandionidae.; sent3 & sent13 -> int11: the fact that the cannonball is not a blanketed is not incorrect.; sent12 & int11 -> int12: the cannonball either is not a daredevilry or does not scram A-list or both.; sent10 & int12 -> int13: the tarpaulin is not a daredevilry.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not a daredevilry.; int14 & sent21 -> int15: the fact that the fact that the anaspid decolonizes Pandionidae and is not a kind of a cemetery is not false is wrong.; int10 & int15 -> int16: the anaspid does not decolonize Pandionidae.; int9 & int16 -> int17: that the anaspid does not differentiate and is calcicolous is not correct.; int8 & int17 -> int18: the anaspid does not galumph.; int18 -> int19: something does not galumph.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the lap is a dumdum but it is not a bustling is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the lap is a dumdum. sent2: if the lap is pleasant or is calcicolous or both then it is not a dumdum. sent3: the cannonball is not a blanketed if it does not decolonize varicocele and it does not underwrite. sent4: the anaspid is calcicolous if the synagogue is not a dumdum. sent5: the anaspid is calcicolous. sent6: something does not galumph if that it does not differentiate and it is calcicolous does not hold. sent7: if the synagogue is not a dumdum then the anaspid is not a dumdum but calcicolous. sent8: the fact that something does not differentiate but it is calcicolous is not right if it does not decolonize Pandionidae. sent9: the lap is a dumdum if the anaspid is not a dumdum. sent10: the tarpaulin is not a kind of a daredevilry if the cannonball either is not a daredevilry or does not scram A-list or both. sent11: if the anaspid is not a dumdum then the lap is a dumdum but it does not bustle. sent12: the cannonball either is not a daredevilry or does not scram A-list or both if it is not a kind of a blanketed. sent13: the cannonball does not decolonize varicocele and it does not underwrite. sent14: if the synagogue is actable then it is not pleasant. sent15: the gunman scrams favor and/or it is actable. sent16: something does not decolonize Pandionidae if that it decolonize Pandionidae and it is not a cemetery does not hold. sent17: that the synagogue is pleasant is not false if it galumphs. sent18: the synagogue does galumph. sent19: if the synagogue is not unactable and/or is a dumdum it is not pleasant. sent20: the synagogue is not unpleasant and/or it is calcicolous. sent21: if there is something such that it is not a daredevilry then that that the anaspid does decolonize Pandionidae and is not a cemetery is not false does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the synagogue is a dumdum.; assump1 -> int1: the synagogue is actable or is a dumdum or both.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the synagogue is not pleasant.; sent17 & sent18 -> int3: the synagogue is pleasant.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the synagogue is not a dumdum.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the anaspid is not a dumdum but it is calcicolous.; int6 -> int7: the anaspid is not a dumdum.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__