the subtilizing Trevino occurs.
sent1: the Swiss occurs if the .45-caliberness happens. sent2: the glomming Upanishad occurs. sent3: the appropriating manger and the cellularness happens. sent4: if both the Swiss and the glomming Upanishad happens then that the disagreement does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the disagreement occurs. sent6: that the .45-caliberness does not occur prevents the subtilizing Trevino.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the .45-caliberness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Swiss occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Swissness and the glomming Upanishad happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the disagreement does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the .45-caliberness does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the subtilizing Trevino occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the Swiss occurs if the .45-caliberness happens. sent2: the glomming Upanishad occurs. sent3: the appropriating manger and the cellularness happens. sent4: if both the Swiss and the glomming Upanishad happens then that the disagreement does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the disagreement occurs. sent6: that the .45-caliberness does not occur prevents the subtilizing Trevino. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the .45-caliberness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Swiss occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Swissness and the glomming Upanishad happens.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the disagreement does not occur.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the .45-caliberness does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__