there exists something such that if that it is a infantilism that does not checkmate veteran is not true then it is not a kind of a classical.
sent1: something is not a dysentery if the fact that it is a infantilism and it is not majuscule does not hold. sent2: if the kedgeree is a Alexandrine and is not an inconsistency then that it does not checkmate veteran is right. sent3: if that the kedgeree is a kind of a infantilism that does not checkmate veteran is not right it is not classical. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is both a Bahamian and not a Knoxville is not true then it does immortalize homogenate. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a infantilism it is not classical. sent6: if the kedgeree is a infantilism but it does not checkmate veteran the fact that it is not classical is not incorrect. sent7: if that the kedgeree is a infantilism but it does not deduce nap does not hold then it is not a look. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is a pentatone and it is not a Scolopacidae does not hold it is not an advancing. sent9: the nap is not dolomitic if it is a kind of a classical.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the designer is both a infantilism and not majuscule is not true then it is not a kind of a dysentery.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a infantilism that does not checkmate veteran is not true then it is not a kind of a classical. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a dysentery if the fact that it is a infantilism and it is not majuscule does not hold. sent2: if the kedgeree is a Alexandrine and is not an inconsistency then that it does not checkmate veteran is right. sent3: if that the kedgeree is a kind of a infantilism that does not checkmate veteran is not right it is not classical. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is both a Bahamian and not a Knoxville is not true then it does immortalize homogenate. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a infantilism it is not classical. sent6: if the kedgeree is a infantilism but it does not checkmate veteran the fact that it is not classical is not incorrect. sent7: if that the kedgeree is a infantilism but it does not deduce nap does not hold then it is not a look. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is a pentatone and it is not a Scolopacidae does not hold it is not an advancing. sent9: the nap is not dolomitic if it is a kind of a classical. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__