both the nonjudgmentalness and the unrepeatableness happens.
sent1: that the intolerantness does not occur is correct. sent2: if the sass and the demoting denationalization happens then the seating does not occur. sent3: the shears does not occur if that the ringing and the tolerantness happens is not right. sent4: the cover-up happens and the sass happens. sent5: the demoting denationalization happens if the fellating happens. sent6: that the ringing happens and the shearing happens is caused by that the intolerantness does not occur. sent7: the returning does not occur if that the demoting denationalization does not occur and the fellating does not occur is incorrect. sent8: that the fact that the ring and the tolerantness happens is not right if the telefilm happens is not wrong. sent9: that the seating does not occur is prevented by the shears. sent10: both the nonjudgmentalness and the demoting denationalization happens if the sassing does not occur. sent11: the fact that the nonjudgmentalness occurs but the repeatableness does not occur is false if the fellating does not occur. sent12: that the seating happens and the sass does not occur is caused by that the cover-up does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fellating happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the demoting denationalization occurs.; sent4 -> int2: the sass happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sassing and the demoting denationalization happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the seating does not occur.; sent6 & sent1 -> int5: the ring occurs and the shears occurs.; int5 -> int6: the shearing occurs.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the seating occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fellating does not occur.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the returning does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = both the nonjudgmentalness and the unrepeatableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the intolerantness does not occur is correct. sent2: if the sass and the demoting denationalization happens then the seating does not occur. sent3: the shears does not occur if that the ringing and the tolerantness happens is not right. sent4: the cover-up happens and the sass happens. sent5: the demoting denationalization happens if the fellating happens. sent6: that the ringing happens and the shearing happens is caused by that the intolerantness does not occur. sent7: the returning does not occur if that the demoting denationalization does not occur and the fellating does not occur is incorrect. sent8: that the fact that the ring and the tolerantness happens is not right if the telefilm happens is not wrong. sent9: that the seating does not occur is prevented by the shears. sent10: both the nonjudgmentalness and the demoting denationalization happens if the sassing does not occur. sent11: the fact that the nonjudgmentalness occurs but the repeatableness does not occur is false if the fellating does not occur. sent12: that the seating happens and the sass does not occur is caused by that the cover-up does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fellating happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the demoting denationalization occurs.; sent4 -> int2: the sass happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the sassing and the demoting denationalization happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the seating does not occur.; sent6 & sent1 -> int5: the ring occurs and the shears occurs.; int5 -> int6: the shearing occurs.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the seating occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fellating does not occur.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__