the fact that the choreographer is not spastic and it does not numerate endogamy is wrong.
sent1: if there is something such that it is commodious then the chanar is not a Ailuropoda. sent2: if that the fact that the chanar is a Ailuropoda and/or it puddles hold is not true it is not a disclosure. sent3: the fact that if the dissolution does numerate endogamy the dissolution is a spastic but it is not a kind of a disclosure is right. sent4: there is something such that it is a puddle. sent5: if something is not a kind of a puddle then that it is a Ailuropoda and it is not commodious does not hold. sent6: if the cunt is not a puddle then that the choreographer is not a Ailuropoda and is commodious is wrong. sent7: if there is something such that it does numerate endogamy the fact that the choreographer is a disclosure or it is a Ailuropoda or both is not true. sent8: if the dissolution is a spastic but it is not a disclosure the potation is not a disclosure. sent9: the fact that the chanar either is a Ailuropoda or is a puddle or both is false if there is something such that the fact that it is commodious hold. sent10: if the potation is a puddle but it is not a Prolog the cunt is not a kind of a puddle. sent11: if that the choreographer does numerate endogamy or is a disclosure or both is wrong it is not a Ailuropoda. sent12: if the chanar is not a kind of a disclosure then the choreographer is not a Prolog. sent13: the bunchgrass is not a spastic. sent14: if the chanar is not a spastic then the choreographer is not a kind of a puddle. sent15: that the sword either is an inhabitant or numerates brother or both does not hold. sent16: if the choreographer is not a Prolog then it is not spastic and it does not numerate endogamy. sent17: there exists something such that it is commodious. sent18: the choreographer is not spastic if it is not a kind of a Prolog. sent19: if the fact that something is a kind of a Ailuropoda but it is not commodious is wrong it is commodious. sent20: if the fact that the choreographer is not a Ailuropoda but commodious is not true then the chanar does not bar FISA. sent21: that something is not a kind of a spastic and does not numerate endogamy is not correct if it is commodious.
sent17 & sent9 -> int1: that that the chanar is a Ailuropoda and/or is a puddle does not hold is correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the chanar is not a disclosure.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the choreographer is not a Prolog.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
that the choreographer is not a kind of a spastic and it does not numerate endogamy is wrong.
sent21 -> int4: if the choreographer is commodious the fact that it is a kind of non-spastic thing that does not numerate endogamy does not hold.; sent19 -> int5: if that the fact that the choreographer is a Ailuropoda and not commodious does not hold is not incorrect it is commodious.; sent5 -> int6: that the fact that the choreographer is a Ailuropoda but it is not commodious is not correct is not incorrect if it is not a puddle.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the choreographer is not spastic and it does not numerate endogamy is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is commodious then the chanar is not a Ailuropoda. sent2: if that the fact that the chanar is a Ailuropoda and/or it puddles hold is not true it is not a disclosure. sent3: the fact that if the dissolution does numerate endogamy the dissolution is a spastic but it is not a kind of a disclosure is right. sent4: there is something such that it is a puddle. sent5: if something is not a kind of a puddle then that it is a Ailuropoda and it is not commodious does not hold. sent6: if the cunt is not a puddle then that the choreographer is not a Ailuropoda and is commodious is wrong. sent7: if there is something such that it does numerate endogamy the fact that the choreographer is a disclosure or it is a Ailuropoda or both is not true. sent8: if the dissolution is a spastic but it is not a disclosure the potation is not a disclosure. sent9: the fact that the chanar either is a Ailuropoda or is a puddle or both is false if there is something such that the fact that it is commodious hold. sent10: if the potation is a puddle but it is not a Prolog the cunt is not a kind of a puddle. sent11: if that the choreographer does numerate endogamy or is a disclosure or both is wrong it is not a Ailuropoda. sent12: if the chanar is not a kind of a disclosure then the choreographer is not a Prolog. sent13: the bunchgrass is not a spastic. sent14: if the chanar is not a spastic then the choreographer is not a kind of a puddle. sent15: that the sword either is an inhabitant or numerates brother or both does not hold. sent16: if the choreographer is not a Prolog then it is not spastic and it does not numerate endogamy. sent17: there exists something such that it is commodious. sent18: the choreographer is not spastic if it is not a kind of a Prolog. sent19: if the fact that something is a kind of a Ailuropoda but it is not commodious is wrong it is commodious. sent20: if the fact that the choreographer is not a Ailuropoda but commodious is not true then the chanar does not bar FISA. sent21: that something is not a kind of a spastic and does not numerate endogamy is not correct if it is commodious. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent9 -> int1: that that the chanar is a Ailuropoda and/or is a puddle does not hold is correct.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the chanar is not a disclosure.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the choreographer is not a Prolog.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__