if the whippersnapper does not enroll then the fact that either the eunuch does not blaspheme synod or it is a Pyrrhocoridae or both is wrong.
sent1: if the whippersnapper enrolls then that the eunuch does not blaspheme synod and/or is a Pyrrhocoridae is not correct. sent2: if the eunuch does not surprise paperhanger it does not blaspheme synod or it is a Pyrrhocoridae or both. sent3: the fact that the lip does not blaspheme synod and does not gloat is not correct if the eunuch is not acrocentric. sent4: if the fact that the Seine is not a abdicator and not an interplay is wrong it is a abdicator. sent5: if that either something does surprise paperhanger or it does levitate or both is wrong it is not acrocentric. sent6: if the whippersnapper does not enroll then the eunuch does not blaspheme synod and/or is a Pyrrhocoridae. sent7: something does surprise paperhanger if it does not blaspheme synod and is acrocentric. sent8: if the Seine is precancerous the whippersnapper does enroll. sent9: if something that does not levitate is an interplay it is precancerous. sent10: if the eunuch is acrocentric and/or it surprises paperhanger the Seine does not levitate. sent11: the whippersnapper either is a shrug or enrolls or both. sent12: something is not a kind of a Pyrrhocoridae if it does not surprise paperhanger. sent13: the cytoplast is not a Pyrrhocoridae. sent14: the Seine is an interplay if that it is not an interplay and does not surprise bunny is not correct. sent15: that something does not blaspheme synod and/or it is a kind of a Pyrrhocoridae is not correct if it does not surprise paperhanger. sent16: the fact that if the Seine does not blaspheme synod then the fact that the Seine is a kind of a Pyrrhocoridae and/or it does surprise bunny is not true hold. sent17: the Seine is not acrocentric if the eunuch is not an interplay. sent18: if either the eunuch surprises bunny or it is not non-acrocentric or both then the fact that the Seine levitates does not hold. sent19: the fact that the Seine is not an interplay and does not surprise bunny is wrong. sent20: if something does not surprise paperhanger that it enrolls and/or does levitate does not hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the eunuch surprises paperhanger is right.; assump2 -> int1: either the eunuch is acrocentric or it does surprise paperhanger or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the Seine does not levitate.; sent14 & sent19 -> int3: the Seine is an interplay.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Seine does not levitate and is an interplay.; sent9 -> int5: if the Seine does not levitate and is an interplay then it is precancerous.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Seine is precancerous.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the whippersnapper enrolls.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whippersnapper does not enroll.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: the eunuch does not surprise paperhanger.; sent15 -> int10: the fact that the eunuch does not blaspheme synod or it is a Pyrrhocoridae or both is not right if it does not surprise paperhanger.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the eunuch does not blaspheme synod and/or is a kind of a Pyrrhocoridae is not correct.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the lip does not blaspheme synod and it is not a gloat is not true.
sent5 -> int12: if that the eunuch surprises paperhanger or it does levitate or both is false then the fact that it is not acrocentric is right.;
$hypothesis$ = if the whippersnapper does not enroll then the fact that either the eunuch does not blaspheme synod or it is a Pyrrhocoridae or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the whippersnapper enrolls then that the eunuch does not blaspheme synod and/or is a Pyrrhocoridae is not correct. sent2: if the eunuch does not surprise paperhanger it does not blaspheme synod or it is a Pyrrhocoridae or both. sent3: the fact that the lip does not blaspheme synod and does not gloat is not correct if the eunuch is not acrocentric. sent4: if the fact that the Seine is not a abdicator and not an interplay is wrong it is a abdicator. sent5: if that either something does surprise paperhanger or it does levitate or both is wrong it is not acrocentric. sent6: if the whippersnapper does not enroll then the eunuch does not blaspheme synod and/or is a Pyrrhocoridae. sent7: something does surprise paperhanger if it does not blaspheme synod and is acrocentric. sent8: if the Seine is precancerous the whippersnapper does enroll. sent9: if something that does not levitate is an interplay it is precancerous. sent10: if the eunuch is acrocentric and/or it surprises paperhanger the Seine does not levitate. sent11: the whippersnapper either is a shrug or enrolls or both. sent12: something is not a kind of a Pyrrhocoridae if it does not surprise paperhanger. sent13: the cytoplast is not a Pyrrhocoridae. sent14: the Seine is an interplay if that it is not an interplay and does not surprise bunny is not correct. sent15: that something does not blaspheme synod and/or it is a kind of a Pyrrhocoridae is not correct if it does not surprise paperhanger. sent16: the fact that if the Seine does not blaspheme synod then the fact that the Seine is a kind of a Pyrrhocoridae and/or it does surprise bunny is not true hold. sent17: the Seine is not acrocentric if the eunuch is not an interplay. sent18: if either the eunuch surprises bunny or it is not non-acrocentric or both then the fact that the Seine levitates does not hold. sent19: the fact that the Seine is not an interplay and does not surprise bunny is wrong. sent20: if something does not surprise paperhanger that it enrolls and/or does levitate does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the eunuch surprises paperhanger is right.; assump2 -> int1: either the eunuch is acrocentric or it does surprise paperhanger or both.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the Seine does not levitate.; sent14 & sent19 -> int3: the Seine is an interplay.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Seine does not levitate and is an interplay.; sent9 -> int5: if the Seine does not levitate and is an interplay then it is precancerous.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Seine is precancerous.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the whippersnapper enrolls.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whippersnapper does not enroll.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: the eunuch does not surprise paperhanger.; sent15 -> int10: the fact that the eunuch does not blaspheme synod or it is a Pyrrhocoridae or both is not right if it does not surprise paperhanger.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the eunuch does not blaspheme synod and/or is a kind of a Pyrrhocoridae is not correct.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__