there exists something such that if that it is not unprotective and it is not nonfinancial is not correct then it is not dumpy.
sent1: the pinprick does not commercialize coccyx if the fact that it is protective and it is not a kind of a samosa does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the matrix is protective but it is not nonfinancial does not hold it is dumpy. sent3: if the fact that something is protective but not conspicuous is not true the fact that it is not an exclusive is right. sent4: there is something such that if that it is protective and it is not nonfinancial is true it is not dumpy. sent5: if that that the matrix luxuriates satirist but it is unrecoverable is not right is not false the fact that it is not a kind of a pod is true. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is protective and nonfinancial is incorrect it is not dumpy. sent7: if the matrix is nonfinancial then that it is not dumpy hold. sent8: the matrix is not uncertain if the fact that it is a kind of nonfinancial thing that is not a guarantee is not true. sent9: the matrix is not nonfinancial if the fact that it is a kind of a quietness that is not priestly is not true. sent10: there is something such that if it is nonfinancial then it is not dumpy. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is logistics and it is not sociolinguistic is not true it does not confer. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not protective it is not dumpy. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is undependable and is not a nephrotomy is incorrect then it is not a Nusku. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is protective and it is not nonfinancial is not correct it is not non-dumpy. sent15: the matrix is not dumpy if that it is protective but not nonfinancial does not hold. sent16: the matrix is not dumpy if it is both not unprotective and non-nonfinancial. sent17: something is not nonfinancial if that it commercializes bismark and is not a lawn does not hold. sent18: something is not a Gheg if that it is nonfinancial and it is not a nephrotomy does not hold.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the matrix does commercialize bismark and is not a kind of a lawn is wrong it is not nonfinancial.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not unprotective and it is not nonfinancial is not correct then it is not dumpy. ; $context$ = sent1: the pinprick does not commercialize coccyx if the fact that it is protective and it is not a kind of a samosa does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the matrix is protective but it is not nonfinancial does not hold it is dumpy. sent3: if the fact that something is protective but not conspicuous is not true the fact that it is not an exclusive is right. sent4: there is something such that if that it is protective and it is not nonfinancial is true it is not dumpy. sent5: if that that the matrix luxuriates satirist but it is unrecoverable is not right is not false the fact that it is not a kind of a pod is true. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is protective and nonfinancial is incorrect it is not dumpy. sent7: if the matrix is nonfinancial then that it is not dumpy hold. sent8: the matrix is not uncertain if the fact that it is a kind of nonfinancial thing that is not a guarantee is not true. sent9: the matrix is not nonfinancial if the fact that it is a kind of a quietness that is not priestly is not true. sent10: there is something such that if it is nonfinancial then it is not dumpy. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is logistics and it is not sociolinguistic is not true it does not confer. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not protective it is not dumpy. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is undependable and is not a nephrotomy is incorrect then it is not a Nusku. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is protective and it is not nonfinancial is not correct it is not non-dumpy. sent15: the matrix is not dumpy if that it is protective but not nonfinancial does not hold. sent16: the matrix is not dumpy if it is both not unprotective and non-nonfinancial. sent17: something is not nonfinancial if that it commercializes bismark and is not a lawn does not hold. sent18: something is not a Gheg if that it is nonfinancial and it is not a nephrotomy does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__