the Genevan unpicks Shaktism.
sent1: something is sublittoral and/or it is not falconine if it is not non-ebracteate. sent2: the Lasso does not unpick consciousness if that it is not dualistic and it bogs outfit does not hold. sent3: the scanning is falconine. sent4: if the Lasso does not unpick consciousness and is a subjunctive then it is not a bowsprit. sent5: if the Ephesian is not falconine then the KBO is not sublittoral. sent6: the scanning does unpick consciousness and/or it is subjunctive if the Lasso does not unpick consciousness. sent7: if the Lasso is not dualistic but it bogs outfit it is not a bowsprit. sent8: the KBO is not dualistic. sent9: the Genevan is not dualistic. sent10: something does not unpick paca if it is not a bowsprit. sent11: something bogs outfit and/or it does not unpick consciousness if it is a bowsprit. sent12: the Genevan does unpick Shaktism if the scanning is a subjunctive. sent13: the KBO is sublittoral if the Lasso does not unpick paca. sent14: the Ephesian is ebracteate. sent15: the Ephesian is falconine if the Genevan is ebracteate. sent16: if the scanning does unpick consciousness the Genevan unpicks Shaktism. sent17: if the Ephesian is sublittoral then the KBO is not sublittoral. sent18: that the KBO is not sublittoral but it is falconine does not hold. sent19: the oakum unpicks Shaktism. sent20: if the fact that something does unpick paca is not false it does unpick Shaktism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Lasso is non-dualistic thing that does bog outfit.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the Lasso is not a kind of a bowsprit is correct.; sent10 -> int2: the Lasso does not unpick paca if the fact that it is not a bowsprit hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Lasso does not unpick paca.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the KBO is sublittoral.; sent1 -> int5: if the Ephesian is ebracteate then either it is sublittoral or it is not falconine or both.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the Ephesian is sublittoral or is not falconine or both is not incorrect.; int6 & sent17 & sent5 -> int7: the KBO is not sublittoral.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the Lasso is not dualistic but it bogs outfit is not right.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the Lasso does not unpick consciousness.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the scanning unpicks consciousness and/or it is a subjunctive.; int11 & sent16 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the foil does unpick Shaktism.
sent20 -> int12: the foil unpicks Shaktism if it unpicks paca.;
$hypothesis$ = the Genevan unpicks Shaktism. ; $context$ = sent1: something is sublittoral and/or it is not falconine if it is not non-ebracteate. sent2: the Lasso does not unpick consciousness if that it is not dualistic and it bogs outfit does not hold. sent3: the scanning is falconine. sent4: if the Lasso does not unpick consciousness and is a subjunctive then it is not a bowsprit. sent5: if the Ephesian is not falconine then the KBO is not sublittoral. sent6: the scanning does unpick consciousness and/or it is subjunctive if the Lasso does not unpick consciousness. sent7: if the Lasso is not dualistic but it bogs outfit it is not a bowsprit. sent8: the KBO is not dualistic. sent9: the Genevan is not dualistic. sent10: something does not unpick paca if it is not a bowsprit. sent11: something bogs outfit and/or it does not unpick consciousness if it is a bowsprit. sent12: the Genevan does unpick Shaktism if the scanning is a subjunctive. sent13: the KBO is sublittoral if the Lasso does not unpick paca. sent14: the Ephesian is ebracteate. sent15: the Ephesian is falconine if the Genevan is ebracteate. sent16: if the scanning does unpick consciousness the Genevan unpicks Shaktism. sent17: if the Ephesian is sublittoral then the KBO is not sublittoral. sent18: that the KBO is not sublittoral but it is falconine does not hold. sent19: the oakum unpicks Shaktism. sent20: if the fact that something does unpick paca is not false it does unpick Shaktism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Lasso is non-dualistic thing that does bog outfit.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the Lasso is not a kind of a bowsprit is correct.; sent10 -> int2: the Lasso does not unpick paca if the fact that it is not a bowsprit hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Lasso does not unpick paca.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the KBO is sublittoral.; sent1 -> int5: if the Ephesian is ebracteate then either it is sublittoral or it is not falconine or both.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the Ephesian is sublittoral or is not falconine or both is not incorrect.; int6 & sent17 & sent5 -> int7: the KBO is not sublittoral.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the Lasso is not dualistic but it bogs outfit is not right.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the Lasso does not unpick consciousness.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the scanning unpicks consciousness and/or it is a subjunctive.; int11 & sent16 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__