that the assuming Dunkirk but not the prewarness happens is not false.
sent1: the Nelson occurs. sent2: the assuming switchboard does not occur. sent3: the spitball happens and the spending applecart does not occur. sent4: the non-prewarness is triggered by that the nonsyllabicness happens but the deserting does not occur. sent5: both the manageableness and the Albigensianness happens if the peekaboo does not occur. sent6: the raiding and the non-inclementness happens. sent7: the assuming affectedness occurs. sent8: the communalism occurs. sent9: that the saccade does not occur is triggered by that the hypertonicness does not occur. sent10: both the assuming Dunkirk and the sizzle occurs. sent11: the duodenalness happens. sent12: if the sizzling does not occur then the non-prewarness and the assuming Dunkirk occurs. sent13: the fact that the assuming trepidation occurs is not wrong. sent14: the sizzling happens. sent15: the bicapsularness occurs. sent16: that the protrusion but not the straight-arm occurs prevents that the sizzling happens. sent17: the nonsyllabicness happens. sent18: that the iriticness happens is prevented by that both the controlling and the mucosalness happens. sent19: the Mesoamerican occurs and the testifying euphuism does not occur. sent20: the ultramicroscopicness does not occur. sent21: the deserting does not occur if the Albigensianness does not occur. sent22: the spending exile occurs. sent23: the absolutistness happens. sent24: the communalism does not occur if both the congee and the duodenalness occurs. sent25: the fact that the protrusion happens hold. sent26: that the Albigensianness happens and the peekaboo happens triggers that the spending exile does not occur. sent27: the peekaboo occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Albigensianness happens.; assump1 & sent27 -> int1: the Albigensianness and the peekaboo occurs.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the spending exile does not occur.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Albigensianness does not occur.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the deserts does not occur.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the nonsyllabicness occurs and the deserting does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the prewarness does not occur.; sent10 -> int8: the assuming Dunkirk happens.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the manageableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the assuming Dunkirk but not the prewarness happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the Nelson occurs. sent2: the assuming switchboard does not occur. sent3: the spitball happens and the spending applecart does not occur. sent4: the non-prewarness is triggered by that the nonsyllabicness happens but the deserting does not occur. sent5: both the manageableness and the Albigensianness happens if the peekaboo does not occur. sent6: the raiding and the non-inclementness happens. sent7: the assuming affectedness occurs. sent8: the communalism occurs. sent9: that the saccade does not occur is triggered by that the hypertonicness does not occur. sent10: both the assuming Dunkirk and the sizzle occurs. sent11: the duodenalness happens. sent12: if the sizzling does not occur then the non-prewarness and the assuming Dunkirk occurs. sent13: the fact that the assuming trepidation occurs is not wrong. sent14: the sizzling happens. sent15: the bicapsularness occurs. sent16: that the protrusion but not the straight-arm occurs prevents that the sizzling happens. sent17: the nonsyllabicness happens. sent18: that the iriticness happens is prevented by that both the controlling and the mucosalness happens. sent19: the Mesoamerican occurs and the testifying euphuism does not occur. sent20: the ultramicroscopicness does not occur. sent21: the deserting does not occur if the Albigensianness does not occur. sent22: the spending exile occurs. sent23: the absolutistness happens. sent24: the communalism does not occur if both the congee and the duodenalness occurs. sent25: the fact that the protrusion happens hold. sent26: that the Albigensianness happens and the peekaboo happens triggers that the spending exile does not occur. sent27: the peekaboo occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Albigensianness happens.; assump1 & sent27 -> int1: the Albigensianness and the peekaboo occurs.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the spending exile does not occur.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Albigensianness does not occur.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the deserts does not occur.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the nonsyllabicness occurs and the deserting does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the prewarness does not occur.; sent10 -> int8: the assuming Dunkirk happens.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__