the fact that there is something such that if it is not actinomorphic or is not a manifold or both then it is not uricosuric is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if it is actinomorphic and/or it is not a kind of a manifold then that it is not uricosuric is not incorrect. sent2: either the underwear is actinomorphic or it is not a manifold or both. sent3: the underwear is not radioactive if it is not a Fletcher and/or it is a dolichocephalic. sent4: the derelict does not heterodyne. sent5: the underwear is actinomorphic. sent6: the underwear is a Calliphoridae. sent7: the pledgee is uricosuric. sent8: if that the underwear is not actinomorphic and/or it is not a manifold is not false then it is uricosuric. sent9: if the underwear does not heterodyne the fact that either it is not actinomorphic or it is not a manifold or both is incorrect. sent10: if the underwear is not heterodyne it is not non-actinomorphic. sent11: the miniver is not isomorphous if it is not a Menelaus and/or is not nonprofessional. sent12: if the underwear is not heterodyne then that it is not actinomorphic or it manifolds or both is wrong. sent13: if the underwear is not actinomorphic then it is not uricosuric. sent14: the underwear is not actinomorphic and/or does not manifold if it is not heterodyne. sent15: if the Bovril is not a Rallidae then the fact that it is not Hebraic and/or it is not a Thunderer is not correct. sent16: the underwear is not maternal. sent17: there is something such that if it is not heterodyne or not uricosuric or both the fact that it does not company sulk is right. sent18: the fact that that the underwear does not tweeze hydrologist and/or it is non-biogenic is false is not false if it is not a kind of a syringe. sent19: there is something such that if it does not manifold it is not uricosuric. sent20: that the fact that something is heterodyne and it is uricosuric is right is not correct if the fact that it does not company sulk hold. sent21: there is something such that if either it is not actinomorphic or it is uricosuric or both then it does not company sulk. sent22: the underwear is not uricosuric if it is not non-heterodyne and/or it companies sulk.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the underwear is non-heterodyne.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the underwear is not actinomorphic and/or it does not manifold is incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the underwear is not actinomorphic or it is not a manifold or both.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the underwear is not non-heterodyne is not incorrect.; int3 -> int4: the underwear does heterodyne and/or it companies sulk.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the underwear is not uricosuric.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: if the underwear is not actinomorphic or it does not manifold or both then it is non-uricosuric.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the Ecuadorian is not heterodyne.
sent20 -> int7: the fact that the underwear heterodynes and it is uricosuric is false if it does not company sulk.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not actinomorphic or is not a manifold or both then it is not uricosuric is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is actinomorphic and/or it is not a kind of a manifold then that it is not uricosuric is not incorrect. sent2: either the underwear is actinomorphic or it is not a manifold or both. sent3: the underwear is not radioactive if it is not a Fletcher and/or it is a dolichocephalic. sent4: the derelict does not heterodyne. sent5: the underwear is actinomorphic. sent6: the underwear is a Calliphoridae. sent7: the pledgee is uricosuric. sent8: if that the underwear is not actinomorphic and/or it is not a manifold is not false then it is uricosuric. sent9: if the underwear does not heterodyne the fact that either it is not actinomorphic or it is not a manifold or both is incorrect. sent10: if the underwear is not heterodyne it is not non-actinomorphic. sent11: the miniver is not isomorphous if it is not a Menelaus and/or is not nonprofessional. sent12: if the underwear is not heterodyne then that it is not actinomorphic or it manifolds or both is wrong. sent13: if the underwear is not actinomorphic then it is not uricosuric. sent14: the underwear is not actinomorphic and/or does not manifold if it is not heterodyne. sent15: if the Bovril is not a Rallidae then the fact that it is not Hebraic and/or it is not a Thunderer is not correct. sent16: the underwear is not maternal. sent17: there is something such that if it is not heterodyne or not uricosuric or both the fact that it does not company sulk is right. sent18: the fact that that the underwear does not tweeze hydrologist and/or it is non-biogenic is false is not false if it is not a kind of a syringe. sent19: there is something such that if it does not manifold it is not uricosuric. sent20: that the fact that something is heterodyne and it is uricosuric is right is not correct if the fact that it does not company sulk hold. sent21: there is something such that if either it is not actinomorphic or it is uricosuric or both then it does not company sulk. sent22: the underwear is not uricosuric if it is not non-heterodyne and/or it companies sulk. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the underwear is non-heterodyne.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the underwear is not actinomorphic and/or it does not manifold is incorrect.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the underwear is not actinomorphic or it is not a manifold or both.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the underwear is not non-heterodyne is not incorrect.; int3 -> int4: the underwear does heterodyne and/or it companies sulk.; int4 & sent22 -> int5: the underwear is not uricosuric.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: if the underwear is not actinomorphic or it does not manifold or both then it is non-uricosuric.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__