the nanny is not stubborn.
sent1: the nanny is not stubborn if it is not an increasing. sent2: if something cases vitamin then it is stubborn. sent3: the fact that the boss does not case Davy and is an increasing is wrong if the nanny case Davy. sent4: that something does tighten but it does not case Davy is incorrect if that it cases vitamin is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the girandole does tighten is not incorrect if the exile does not case vitamin. sent6: if that the exile does not tighten and does case Davy is wrong it does not case vitamin. sent7: the girandole does not case vitamin if that it does not flatten Tudor and it is a Kadai is incorrect. sent8: that the boss is not an increasing is true. sent9: if the exile does not case vitamin then the girandole tightens and does not flatten Tudor. sent10: The Davy does case boss. sent11: something is a Kadai if that it is not stubborn and it is not a Kadai is incorrect. sent12: if the nanny cases Davy then it is not an increasing. sent13: if that the nanny does not case vitamin and is a Kadai does not hold it is not an increasing. sent14: the retardant does case Weizmann and does not flatten straggle. sent15: the boss does case Davy. sent16: if the exile does case vitamin the fact that the nanny does not case vitamin and is a kind of a Kadai is not correct. sent17: the exile does not case Davy if the fact that the girandole is not a Kadai and it does not increase does not hold. sent18: the girandole does not case Davy if something that tightens cases vitamin. sent19: that the nanny is not a Kadai and tightens is false. sent20: if the exile is a kind of a Kadai then the boss is a kind of a Kadai. sent21: the fact that something is both not a Kadai and not an increasing is incorrect if that it is a kind of a couple hold. sent22: the nanny does not flatten Tudor if that it is not a kind of a Kadai and it does case vitamin is wrong. sent23: the girandole is not a kind of a Kadai. sent24: the boss does not case Davy if something that tightens does not flatten Tudor. sent25: the fact that if the fact that something tightens and does not case Davy is incorrect then it does not tightens is not incorrect. sent26: the fact that the exile is non-stubborn and not a Kadai is wrong if the girandole does not increase. sent27: the boss is pathological.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exile does not case vitamin.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the girandole tightens but it does not flatten Tudor.; int1 -> int2: the fact that something does tighten but it does not flatten Tudor is correct.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the boss does not case Davy.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the exile does case vitamin.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the nanny does not case vitamin but it is a Kadai is not wrong is wrong.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the nanny is not an increasing.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the nanny is stubborn.
sent2 -> int8: if the nanny does case vitamin then it is stubborn.; sent21 -> int9: if that the girandole does couple hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a Kadai and it is not an increasing is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the nanny is not stubborn. ; $context$ = sent1: the nanny is not stubborn if it is not an increasing. sent2: if something cases vitamin then it is stubborn. sent3: the fact that the boss does not case Davy and is an increasing is wrong if the nanny case Davy. sent4: that something does tighten but it does not case Davy is incorrect if that it cases vitamin is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that the girandole does tighten is not incorrect if the exile does not case vitamin. sent6: if that the exile does not tighten and does case Davy is wrong it does not case vitamin. sent7: the girandole does not case vitamin if that it does not flatten Tudor and it is a Kadai is incorrect. sent8: that the boss is not an increasing is true. sent9: if the exile does not case vitamin then the girandole tightens and does not flatten Tudor. sent10: The Davy does case boss. sent11: something is a Kadai if that it is not stubborn and it is not a Kadai is incorrect. sent12: if the nanny cases Davy then it is not an increasing. sent13: if that the nanny does not case vitamin and is a Kadai does not hold it is not an increasing. sent14: the retardant does case Weizmann and does not flatten straggle. sent15: the boss does case Davy. sent16: if the exile does case vitamin the fact that the nanny does not case vitamin and is a kind of a Kadai is not correct. sent17: the exile does not case Davy if the fact that the girandole is not a Kadai and it does not increase does not hold. sent18: the girandole does not case Davy if something that tightens cases vitamin. sent19: that the nanny is not a Kadai and tightens is false. sent20: if the exile is a kind of a Kadai then the boss is a kind of a Kadai. sent21: the fact that something is both not a Kadai and not an increasing is incorrect if that it is a kind of a couple hold. sent22: the nanny does not flatten Tudor if that it is not a kind of a Kadai and it does case vitamin is wrong. sent23: the girandole is not a kind of a Kadai. sent24: the boss does not case Davy if something that tightens does not flatten Tudor. sent25: the fact that if the fact that something tightens and does not case Davy is incorrect then it does not tightens is not incorrect. sent26: the fact that the exile is non-stubborn and not a Kadai is wrong if the girandole does not increase. sent27: the boss is pathological. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exile does not case vitamin.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the girandole tightens but it does not flatten Tudor.; int1 -> int2: the fact that something does tighten but it does not flatten Tudor is correct.; int2 & sent24 -> int3: the boss does not case Davy.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the exile does case vitamin.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the nanny does not case vitamin but it is a Kadai is not wrong is wrong.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the nanny is not an increasing.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__