that the conferrer does exhale tulip and is not Yuman does not hold.
sent1: that something does exhale tulip and is not a Yuman is not true if it does not apologize. sent2: that something is not a kind of a F but it is alliaceous is incorrect if that it does apologize hold. sent3: something is not a anamorphism. sent4: the fact that the conferrer does not dream accuser but it is permissible is incorrect if it does whistle wolfsbane. sent5: the conferrer does not exhale tulip if that it is not a pheno-safranine and is a kind of an ethnic is not true. sent6: if something is unsuccessful that it smites pouch and does not apologize is incorrect. sent7: the conferrer does smite pouch and/or it is not successful. sent8: if the fact that the niche does not exhale abutter but it is a Schlumbergera does not hold then it is not a kind of a Yuman. sent9: that the quarrel does not whistle gallop is not incorrect if that it does not exhale tulip and it smites Abidjan is not correct. sent10: the conferrer exhales tulip. sent11: if that something is a Episcopalianism that does not brachiate is wrong it is not journalistic. sent12: if the conferrer is a F then the fact that it is not fashionable is right. sent13: if the feel is journalistic then it is unsuccessful. sent14: that the conferrer does not exhale settle hold. sent15: something is not a Yuman if that it is not a kind of a F and it is alliaceous does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the conferrer smites pouch is not false then it apologizes. sent17: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a anamorphism then the fact that the feel is a kind of a Episcopalianism that does not brachiate is wrong. sent18: The tulip exhales conferrer. sent19: if the conferrer is unsuccessful then it does apologize. sent20: the conferrer either smites pouch or smites trout or both. sent21: the strider apologizes. sent22: the cellulose is a abrader or does mobilize or both.
sent2 -> int1: if the conferrer apologizes that the fact that it is not a F but alliaceous hold is not right.; sent7 & sent16 & sent19 -> int2: the conferrer does apologize.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the conferrer is not a kind of a F but it is alliaceous is false.; sent15 -> int4: the conferrer is not a Yuman if the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a F and it is alliaceous is not incorrect is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the conferrer is not a Yuman.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the conferrer exhales tulip but it is not a Yuman is false.
sent6 -> int6: the fact that the feel does smite pouch but it does not apologize is not true if the fact that it is unsuccessful is true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the conferrer does exhale tulip and is not Yuman does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does exhale tulip and is not a Yuman is not true if it does not apologize. sent2: that something is not a kind of a F but it is alliaceous is incorrect if that it does apologize hold. sent3: something is not a anamorphism. sent4: the fact that the conferrer does not dream accuser but it is permissible is incorrect if it does whistle wolfsbane. sent5: the conferrer does not exhale tulip if that it is not a pheno-safranine and is a kind of an ethnic is not true. sent6: if something is unsuccessful that it smites pouch and does not apologize is incorrect. sent7: the conferrer does smite pouch and/or it is not successful. sent8: if the fact that the niche does not exhale abutter but it is a Schlumbergera does not hold then it is not a kind of a Yuman. sent9: that the quarrel does not whistle gallop is not incorrect if that it does not exhale tulip and it smites Abidjan is not correct. sent10: the conferrer exhales tulip. sent11: if that something is a Episcopalianism that does not brachiate is wrong it is not journalistic. sent12: if the conferrer is a F then the fact that it is not fashionable is right. sent13: if the feel is journalistic then it is unsuccessful. sent14: that the conferrer does not exhale settle hold. sent15: something is not a Yuman if that it is not a kind of a F and it is alliaceous does not hold. sent16: if the fact that the conferrer smites pouch is not false then it apologizes. sent17: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a anamorphism then the fact that the feel is a kind of a Episcopalianism that does not brachiate is wrong. sent18: The tulip exhales conferrer. sent19: if the conferrer is unsuccessful then it does apologize. sent20: the conferrer either smites pouch or smites trout or both. sent21: the strider apologizes. sent22: the cellulose is a abrader or does mobilize or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the conferrer apologizes that the fact that it is not a F but alliaceous hold is not right.; sent7 & sent16 & sent19 -> int2: the conferrer does apologize.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the conferrer is not a kind of a F but it is alliaceous is false.; sent15 -> int4: the conferrer is not a Yuman if the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a F and it is alliaceous is not incorrect is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the conferrer is not a Yuman.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__