the bismuth is therapeutics.
sent1: if that the capybara is not stable but a niblick is not right then the blanc is not a kind of a niblick. sent2: the heelbone is not unpublishable. sent3: something is a skinny-dipper if that the fact that it is not pyloric and it is not a kind of a skinny-dipper is not wrong is not right. sent4: that something is not a lotusland and/or does orchestrate commercialization is wrong if it does not incurvate. sent5: the bismuth is therapeutics if the rail-splitter is patellar. sent6: something that does not hunger facilitator does not blinker fugitive. sent7: the fact that that the capybara is not a kind of a stable but it is a niblick is not right is not false if it does not burglarize capybara. sent8: the rail-splitter is a kind of a tackler. sent9: the rail-splitter is non-wet if that it is unpublishable and it is not non-patellar does not hold. sent10: something is not patellar but it is animist if it is a skinny-dipper. sent11: that the rail-splitter is patellar thing that orchestrates Banff if the heelbone is not wet is not incorrect. sent12: if the bollock is a hysterectomy then the sorceress is a hysterectomy. sent13: the fact that something is non-pyloric and it is not a kind of a skinny-dipper is false if it is a hysterectomy. sent14: something incurvates and it is a kind of a branched if it is not a niblick. sent15: if the heelbone is not unpublishable then the fact that it is a Excalibur and it is a tackler is not true. sent16: if the heelbone is unpublishable and it wets then the bismuth is not therapeutics. sent17: something does not wet if the fact that it is a Excalibur and is a tackler is not true. sent18: if that something is not a kind of a lotusland and/or it does orchestrate commercialization is false it is a hysterectomy. sent19: if the blanc does incurvate the bollock does not incurvate. sent20: the rail-splitter orchestrates Banff. sent21: the heelbone is unpublishable and it is wet if the rail-splitter does not orchestrate Banff. sent22: if the sorceress is not patellar but it is a kind of an animist then the rail-splitter does not orchestrate Banff.
sent15 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the heelbone is a Excalibur and a tackler does not hold hold.; sent17 -> int2: the heelbone does not wet if that it is a Excalibur and it is a tackler is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the heelbone does not wet.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the rail-splitter is patellar and it orchestrates Banff.; int4 -> int5: that the rail-splitter is patellar is not wrong.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the bismuth is not therapeutics.
sent10 -> int6: the sorceress is not patellar but it is an animist if it is a skinny-dipper.; sent3 -> int7: the sorceress is a skinny-dipper if that it is a kind of non-pyloric thing that is not a kind of a skinny-dipper does not hold.; sent13 -> int8: if the sorceress is a hysterectomy then the fact that it is not pyloric and it is not a skinny-dipper is incorrect.; sent18 -> int9: if that either the bollock is not a lotusland or it orchestrates commercialization or both is not right then it is a kind of a hysterectomy.; sent4 -> int10: the fact that the bollock is not a lotusland and/or it orchestrates commercialization is false if it does not incurvate.; sent14 -> int11: if the blanc is not a niblick it does incurvate and it does branch.;
$hypothesis$ = the bismuth is therapeutics. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the capybara is not stable but a niblick is not right then the blanc is not a kind of a niblick. sent2: the heelbone is not unpublishable. sent3: something is a skinny-dipper if that the fact that it is not pyloric and it is not a kind of a skinny-dipper is not wrong is not right. sent4: that something is not a lotusland and/or does orchestrate commercialization is wrong if it does not incurvate. sent5: the bismuth is therapeutics if the rail-splitter is patellar. sent6: something that does not hunger facilitator does not blinker fugitive. sent7: the fact that that the capybara is not a kind of a stable but it is a niblick is not right is not false if it does not burglarize capybara. sent8: the rail-splitter is a kind of a tackler. sent9: the rail-splitter is non-wet if that it is unpublishable and it is not non-patellar does not hold. sent10: something is not patellar but it is animist if it is a skinny-dipper. sent11: that the rail-splitter is patellar thing that orchestrates Banff if the heelbone is not wet is not incorrect. sent12: if the bollock is a hysterectomy then the sorceress is a hysterectomy. sent13: the fact that something is non-pyloric and it is not a kind of a skinny-dipper is false if it is a hysterectomy. sent14: something incurvates and it is a kind of a branched if it is not a niblick. sent15: if the heelbone is not unpublishable then the fact that it is a Excalibur and it is a tackler is not true. sent16: if the heelbone is unpublishable and it wets then the bismuth is not therapeutics. sent17: something does not wet if the fact that it is a Excalibur and is a tackler is not true. sent18: if that something is not a kind of a lotusland and/or it does orchestrate commercialization is false it is a hysterectomy. sent19: if the blanc does incurvate the bollock does not incurvate. sent20: the rail-splitter orchestrates Banff. sent21: the heelbone is unpublishable and it is wet if the rail-splitter does not orchestrate Banff. sent22: if the sorceress is not patellar but it is a kind of an animist then the rail-splitter does not orchestrate Banff. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent2 -> int1: that the fact that the heelbone is a Excalibur and a tackler does not hold hold.; sent17 -> int2: the heelbone does not wet if that it is a Excalibur and it is a tackler is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the heelbone does not wet.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the rail-splitter is patellar and it orchestrates Banff.; int4 -> int5: that the rail-splitter is patellar is not wrong.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__