that there is something such that if it is a chloropicrin and it is not a kind of a goldfish then it is not amphitheatric is false.
sent1: the numdah is amphitheatric if it is a kind of a chloropicrin and it is not a goldfish. sent2: the numdah is not amphitheatric if it is a chloropicrin and it is not a goldfish. sent3: there is something such that if that it is a chloropicrin and a goldfish is right it is not amphitheatric. sent4: there exists something such that if it directs and it is not ungual it is not a kind of a seabag. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a chloropicrin and it is not a goldfish then it is amphitheatric. sent6: if the numdah is a kind of a chloropicrin and it is a goldfish then it is not amphitheatric. sent7: if the sambar respects intellectual and does not marvel Montgolfier then it is not a chloropicrin. sent8: the numdah is not a kind of a retirement if it is regressive but not amphitheatric.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a chloropicrin and it is not a kind of a goldfish then it is not amphitheatric is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the numdah is amphitheatric if it is a kind of a chloropicrin and it is not a goldfish. sent2: the numdah is not amphitheatric if it is a chloropicrin and it is not a goldfish. sent3: there is something such that if that it is a chloropicrin and a goldfish is right it is not amphitheatric. sent4: there exists something such that if it directs and it is not ungual it is not a kind of a seabag. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a chloropicrin and it is not a goldfish then it is amphitheatric. sent6: if the numdah is a kind of a chloropicrin and it is a goldfish then it is not amphitheatric. sent7: if the sambar respects intellectual and does not marvel Montgolfier then it is not a chloropicrin. sent8: the numdah is not a kind of a retirement if it is regressive but not amphitheatric. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__