the atrophying and/or the recrudescence happens.
sent1: the dragging does not occur. sent2: the cartographicness happens. sent3: if the fact that both the non-unproductiveness and the non-cartographicness occurs is not right then the unproductiveness occurs. sent4: if the fatwa does not occur the flock happens. sent5: that the read does not occur is not incorrect if both the cartographicness and the fatwa occurs. sent6: the grunting happens. sent7: that the flock and the acquiescence occurs brings about that the monetariness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the atrophying does not occur is not false if the monetariness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the unproductiveness does not occur and the cartographicness does not occur is not true. sent10: the fact that either the atrophying or the recrudescence or both occurs does not hold if the monetariness does not occur. sent11: the grunt occurs if the fact that the expansion does not occur and the grunt does not occur does not hold. sent12: if the headmastership does not occur that the expansion occurs hold. sent13: the expansion occurs. sent14: that the grunt happens is triggered by that the drag does not occur. sent15: the cartographicness does not occur if that either the flocking does not occur or the read happens or both does not hold. sent16: the atrophy does not occur. sent17: the fact that either the proportionateness or the circumstance or both happens does not hold. sent18: if the fact that the headmastership does not occur is not incorrect then the read happens and the expansion happens. sent19: if the dragging does not occur then the acquiescence happens and the grunting happens. sent20: the headmastership does not occur. sent21: if the cartographicness does not occur that the fatwa occurs but the recrudescence does not occur is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fatwa happens is not false.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: both the cartographicness and the fatwa happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the reading does not occur.; sent18 & sent20 -> int3: the read and the expansion occurs.; int3 -> int4: the reading happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fatwa does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the flocking happens.; sent19 & sent1 -> int8: the acquiescence and the grunting happens.; int8 -> int9: the acquiescence occurs.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the flocking occurs and the acquiescence occurs.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the monetariness does not occur.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the unproductiveness occurs.
sent3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the atrophying and/or the recrudescence happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the dragging does not occur. sent2: the cartographicness happens. sent3: if the fact that both the non-unproductiveness and the non-cartographicness occurs is not right then the unproductiveness occurs. sent4: if the fatwa does not occur the flock happens. sent5: that the read does not occur is not incorrect if both the cartographicness and the fatwa occurs. sent6: the grunting happens. sent7: that the flock and the acquiescence occurs brings about that the monetariness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the atrophying does not occur is not false if the monetariness does not occur. sent9: the fact that the unproductiveness does not occur and the cartographicness does not occur is not true. sent10: the fact that either the atrophying or the recrudescence or both occurs does not hold if the monetariness does not occur. sent11: the grunt occurs if the fact that the expansion does not occur and the grunt does not occur does not hold. sent12: if the headmastership does not occur that the expansion occurs hold. sent13: the expansion occurs. sent14: that the grunt happens is triggered by that the drag does not occur. sent15: the cartographicness does not occur if that either the flocking does not occur or the read happens or both does not hold. sent16: the atrophy does not occur. sent17: the fact that either the proportionateness or the circumstance or both happens does not hold. sent18: if the fact that the headmastership does not occur is not incorrect then the read happens and the expansion happens. sent19: if the dragging does not occur then the acquiescence happens and the grunting happens. sent20: the headmastership does not occur. sent21: if the cartographicness does not occur that the fatwa occurs but the recrudescence does not occur is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fatwa happens is not false.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: both the cartographicness and the fatwa happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the reading does not occur.; sent18 & sent20 -> int3: the read and the expansion occurs.; int3 -> int4: the reading happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fatwa does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the flocking happens.; sent19 & sent1 -> int8: the acquiescence and the grunting happens.; int8 -> int9: the acquiescence occurs.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the flocking occurs and the acquiescence occurs.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the monetariness does not occur.; int11 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__