if the summeriness occurs then the denaturalizing tune occurs.
sent1: that both the non-summeryness and the non-unreasonableness occurs prevents that the denaturalizing tune does not occur. sent2: if the unreasonableness happens then the denaturalizing tune happens. sent3: the conventionalization occurs. sent4: that the non-summeryness and the unreasonableness happens is not true. sent5: the acceptableness happens. sent6: the parodying spastic does not occur and the blastomycoticness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the ionicness does not occur and the laryngospasm does not occur is not true. sent8: the lathering acetate happens if the partition happens. sent9: the fact that the lathering Mennonitism does not occur and the hurtling landside does not occur is not right. sent10: the melting does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the summeriness and the reasonableness happens does not hold then the denaturalizing tune happens. sent12: that the non-unreasonableness and/or the non-summeryness occurs is triggered by that the denaturalizing tune does not occur. sent13: the fact that the uplifting does not occur and the denaturalizing Schutzstaffel does not occur is false. sent14: the unreasonableness does not occur. sent15: both the summeriness and the reasonableness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-summeriness and the reasonableness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the summeriness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the summeriness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that both the non-summeriness and the reasonableness occurs is false.;
the blastomycoticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the summeriness occurs then the denaturalizing tune occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the non-summeryness and the non-unreasonableness occurs prevents that the denaturalizing tune does not occur. sent2: if the unreasonableness happens then the denaturalizing tune happens. sent3: the conventionalization occurs. sent4: that the non-summeryness and the unreasonableness happens is not true. sent5: the acceptableness happens. sent6: the parodying spastic does not occur and the blastomycoticness does not occur. sent7: the fact that the ionicness does not occur and the laryngospasm does not occur is not true. sent8: the lathering acetate happens if the partition happens. sent9: the fact that the lathering Mennonitism does not occur and the hurtling landside does not occur is not right. sent10: the melting does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the summeriness and the reasonableness happens does not hold then the denaturalizing tune happens. sent12: that the non-unreasonableness and/or the non-summeryness occurs is triggered by that the denaturalizing tune does not occur. sent13: the fact that the uplifting does not occur and the denaturalizing Schutzstaffel does not occur is false. sent14: the unreasonableness does not occur. sent15: both the summeriness and the reasonableness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-summeriness and the reasonableness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the summeriness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the summeriness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that both the non-summeriness and the reasonableness occurs is false.; __UNKNOWN__