the Mesoamerican occurs if the intervention occurs.
sent1: the deniableness occurs. sent2: if the Mesoamericanness does not occur that that the elementalness does not occur and the intervention does not occur hold does not hold. sent3: the maddening Gerbera occurs if the tribuneship does not occur and the yeastiness occurs. sent4: if the elementalness does not occur and the intervention occurs then the Mesoamericanness happens. sent5: the deniableness occurs or the breaststroke happens or both. sent6: if that the breaststroke does not occur is correct then that the quietness and the non-deniableness happens does not hold. sent7: the nonfictionalness does not occur. sent8: the megillah happens and the concretizing Westinghouse happens. sent9: if that the fact that the brakes occurs and the strain occurs is not correct hold then that the Mesoamericanness does not occur hold. sent10: if the cericness does not occur then the fact that the brakes happens and the strain occurs is incorrect. sent11: the breaststroke occurs. sent12: the glamorizing hiddenite does not occur if both the tribuneship and the blizzard occurs. sent13: that the deniableness and the breaststroke occurs prevents that the elementalness occurs. sent14: if the nonfictionalness does not occur either the nonfissileness occurs or the roads occurs or both. sent15: the cericness does not occur if the glamorizing hiddenite does not occur. sent16: the fact that the quietness does not occur is correct if the fact that the quietness and the non-deniableness occurs is not right.
sent1 & sent11 -> int1: the deniableness and the breaststroking occurs.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the elementalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intervention occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: that the non-elementalness and the intervention occurs is not false.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the Mesoamericanness happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the maxillomandibularness and the maddening department happens hold.
$hypothesis$ = the Mesoamerican occurs if the intervention occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the deniableness occurs. sent2: if the Mesoamericanness does not occur that that the elementalness does not occur and the intervention does not occur hold does not hold. sent3: the maddening Gerbera occurs if the tribuneship does not occur and the yeastiness occurs. sent4: if the elementalness does not occur and the intervention occurs then the Mesoamericanness happens. sent5: the deniableness occurs or the breaststroke happens or both. sent6: if that the breaststroke does not occur is correct then that the quietness and the non-deniableness happens does not hold. sent7: the nonfictionalness does not occur. sent8: the megillah happens and the concretizing Westinghouse happens. sent9: if that the fact that the brakes occurs and the strain occurs is not correct hold then that the Mesoamericanness does not occur hold. sent10: if the cericness does not occur then the fact that the brakes happens and the strain occurs is incorrect. sent11: the breaststroke occurs. sent12: the glamorizing hiddenite does not occur if both the tribuneship and the blizzard occurs. sent13: that the deniableness and the breaststroke occurs prevents that the elementalness occurs. sent14: if the nonfictionalness does not occur either the nonfissileness occurs or the roads occurs or both. sent15: the cericness does not occur if the glamorizing hiddenite does not occur. sent16: the fact that the quietness does not occur is correct if the fact that the quietness and the non-deniableness occurs is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent11 -> int1: the deniableness and the breaststroking occurs.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the elementalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the intervention occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: that the non-elementalness and the intervention occurs is not false.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the Mesoamericanness happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__