if the vigilantism occurs the fact that the effervescentness but not the switcheroo happens is not correct.
sent1: if the completing does not occur and the abnegation does not occur then the vigilantism happens. sent2: the abnegation does not occur. sent3: the Dalmatian does not occur if the glazing coil does not occur but the glazing Stanton happens. sent4: if the conventionalization does not occur the benison does not occur and the operationalness does not occur. sent5: that the completing does not occur and the abnegation does not occur prevents that the vigilantism happens. sent6: that the switcheroo does not occur yields that the completeness does not occur and the abnegation does not occur. sent7: the admissibleness happens and the sclaff does not occur if the equivocalness occurs. sent8: the fact that the insubstantialness does not occur is true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the vigilantism occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the effervescentness occurs and the switcheroo does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the switcheroo does not occur.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the completeness does not occur and the abnegation does not occur.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the vigilantism does not occur.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the effervescentness but not the switcheroo happens is incorrect.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the vigilantism occurs the fact that the effervescentness but not the switcheroo happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the completing does not occur and the abnegation does not occur then the vigilantism happens. sent2: the abnegation does not occur. sent3: the Dalmatian does not occur if the glazing coil does not occur but the glazing Stanton happens. sent4: if the conventionalization does not occur the benison does not occur and the operationalness does not occur. sent5: that the completing does not occur and the abnegation does not occur prevents that the vigilantism happens. sent6: that the switcheroo does not occur yields that the completeness does not occur and the abnegation does not occur. sent7: the admissibleness happens and the sclaff does not occur if the equivocalness occurs. sent8: the fact that the insubstantialness does not occur is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the vigilantism occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the effervescentness occurs and the switcheroo does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the switcheroo does not occur.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the completeness does not occur and the abnegation does not occur.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the vigilantism does not occur.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the effervescentness but not the switcheroo happens is incorrect.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__