the fact that that not the solicitorship but the empiricalness happens is brought about by the Mark is wrong.
sent1: the potlatch occurs. sent2: the ruralness occurs. sent3: that the draining happens but the Saturnalia does not occur is brought about by that the shuttingness happens. sent4: if the fact that the non-ruralness and the flowing happens is not right the flowing does not occur. sent5: that the nightlife and the solicitorship occurs prevents that the Mark occurs. sent6: if that both the nightlife and the solicitorship happens is not wrong then that the Mark occurs hold. sent7: both the grooving and the reversibleness happens. sent8: that the juke does not occur is prevented by that the working occurs. sent9: that the palpitating does not occur causes the fingering. sent10: if the Mark does not occur but the solicitorship occurs then the nightlife does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the optionalness occurs is correct that the shuttingness does not occur and the nitrifying does not occur is not correct. sent12: if that the working does not occur and the swabbing occurs does not hold then the working happens. sent13: that if that the shuttingness does not occur and the nitrifying does not occur is incorrect the shuttingness happens is not incorrect. sent14: both the fingering and the empiricalness happens if the palpitating does not occur. sent15: that the potlatch but not the capacity happens prevents the palpitating. sent16: both the ruralness and the nightlife happens. sent17: the invigilation occurs. sent18: the excising Nergal does not occur. sent19: the optionalness occurs if the fact that the juke happens is right. sent20: the Victorian does not occur. sent21: the fact that the palpitating does not occur and the fingering does not occur is not correct if the potlatch occurs. sent22: the fingering happens. sent23: that both the potlatch and the capacity occurs is brought about by that the Saturnalia does not occur. sent24: the potlatch happens but the capacity does not occur. sent25: if the nightlife does not occur then the fact that both the non-ruralness and the flowing happens is incorrect.
sent16 -> int1: the nightlife happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the solicitorship occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the nightlife and the solicitorship happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Mark does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mark happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the solicitorship does not occur.; sent15 & sent24 -> int6: the palpitating does not occur.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the fingering and the empiricalness occurs.; int7 -> int8: the empiricalness happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: not the solicitorship but the empiricalness happens.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the flow does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that not the solicitorship but the empiricalness happens is brought about by the Mark is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the potlatch occurs. sent2: the ruralness occurs. sent3: that the draining happens but the Saturnalia does not occur is brought about by that the shuttingness happens. sent4: if the fact that the non-ruralness and the flowing happens is not right the flowing does not occur. sent5: that the nightlife and the solicitorship occurs prevents that the Mark occurs. sent6: if that both the nightlife and the solicitorship happens is not wrong then that the Mark occurs hold. sent7: both the grooving and the reversibleness happens. sent8: that the juke does not occur is prevented by that the working occurs. sent9: that the palpitating does not occur causes the fingering. sent10: if the Mark does not occur but the solicitorship occurs then the nightlife does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the optionalness occurs is correct that the shuttingness does not occur and the nitrifying does not occur is not correct. sent12: if that the working does not occur and the swabbing occurs does not hold then the working happens. sent13: that if that the shuttingness does not occur and the nitrifying does not occur is incorrect the shuttingness happens is not incorrect. sent14: both the fingering and the empiricalness happens if the palpitating does not occur. sent15: that the potlatch but not the capacity happens prevents the palpitating. sent16: both the ruralness and the nightlife happens. sent17: the invigilation occurs. sent18: the excising Nergal does not occur. sent19: the optionalness occurs if the fact that the juke happens is right. sent20: the Victorian does not occur. sent21: the fact that the palpitating does not occur and the fingering does not occur is not correct if the potlatch occurs. sent22: the fingering happens. sent23: that both the potlatch and the capacity occurs is brought about by that the Saturnalia does not occur. sent24: the potlatch happens but the capacity does not occur. sent25: if the nightlife does not occur then the fact that both the non-ruralness and the flowing happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the nightlife happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the solicitorship occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the nightlife and the solicitorship happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Mark does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mark happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the solicitorship does not occur.; sent15 & sent24 -> int6: the palpitating does not occur.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the fingering and the empiricalness occurs.; int7 -> int8: the empiricalness happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: not the solicitorship but the empiricalness happens.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__