the fact that the invertibleness happens and the ipsilateralness occurs if the pugilisticness does not occur is not right.
sent1: if the pugilisticness occurs the invertibleness happens and the ipsilateralness happens. sent2: the misrepresentation brings about that the gravity does not occur. sent3: both the non-normalness and the formulation occurs. sent4: the duplicate occurs. sent5: that both the non-phenomenalness and the blackmailing yielding happens is triggered by that the duplicate does not occur. sent6: the auricularness does not occur. sent7: the invertibleness happens if the duplicate occurs and the pugilisticness happens. sent8: the fact that the skimming happens and the salvo does not occur is correct. sent9: if the ipsilateralness does not occur then the fact that the fact that the invertibleness happens and the pugilisticness occurs is not right is correct. sent10: the misrepresentation occurs. sent11: the gravity does not occur. sent12: the Honduranness but not the pressorness happens. sent13: the invertibleness happens if the duplicate and the non-pugilisticness happens. sent14: if the misrepresentation occurs then not the gravity but the ipsilateralness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pugilisticness does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: both the duplicate and the non-pugilisticness occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the invertibleness happens.; sent14 & sent10 -> int3: the gravity does not occur and the ipsilateralness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the ipsilateralness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the invertibleness and the ipsilateralness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the non-phenomenalness and the blackmailing yielding happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the invertibleness happens and the ipsilateralness occurs if the pugilisticness does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pugilisticness occurs the invertibleness happens and the ipsilateralness happens. sent2: the misrepresentation brings about that the gravity does not occur. sent3: both the non-normalness and the formulation occurs. sent4: the duplicate occurs. sent5: that both the non-phenomenalness and the blackmailing yielding happens is triggered by that the duplicate does not occur. sent6: the auricularness does not occur. sent7: the invertibleness happens if the duplicate occurs and the pugilisticness happens. sent8: the fact that the skimming happens and the salvo does not occur is correct. sent9: if the ipsilateralness does not occur then the fact that the fact that the invertibleness happens and the pugilisticness occurs is not right is correct. sent10: the misrepresentation occurs. sent11: the gravity does not occur. sent12: the Honduranness but not the pressorness happens. sent13: the invertibleness happens if the duplicate and the non-pugilisticness happens. sent14: if the misrepresentation occurs then not the gravity but the ipsilateralness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pugilisticness does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: both the duplicate and the non-pugilisticness occurs.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the invertibleness happens.; sent14 & sent10 -> int3: the gravity does not occur and the ipsilateralness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the ipsilateralness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the invertibleness and the ipsilateralness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__