that the democratization does not occur is not incorrect.
sent1: the fact that not the development but the alopecicness occurs does not hold if the reprising ostiole does not occur. sent2: both the normalness and the reprising ostiole happens if the focalness does not occur. sent3: the normalness does not occur if the equestrianness does not occur. sent4: the development does not occur but the alopecicness occurs if the biocatalyticness occurs. sent5: the focalness happens and the reprising ostiole does not occur. sent6: that the democratization does not occur is prevented by that the normalness does not occur. sent7: that the non-alopecicness and the non-equestrianness occurs results in that the biocatalyticness does not occur. sent8: that the reprising naturalization does not occur results in that the focalness does not occur and the BAN does not occur. sent9: if that either the scramble does not occur or the ramble occurs or both does not hold then that the biocatalyticness happens is not false. sent10: that the scramble does not occur and/or the ramble prevents the equestrianness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that either the scramble does not occur or the ramble happens or both is wrong.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the biocatalyticness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the development does not occur but the alopecicness happens.; sent5 -> int3: the reprising ostiole does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that that the development does not occur and the alopecicness occurs hold is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: either the scramble does not occur or the ramble occurs or both.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the equestrianness does not occur is right.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the normalness does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the democratization does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the democratization does not occur is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the development but the alopecicness occurs does not hold if the reprising ostiole does not occur. sent2: both the normalness and the reprising ostiole happens if the focalness does not occur. sent3: the normalness does not occur if the equestrianness does not occur. sent4: the development does not occur but the alopecicness occurs if the biocatalyticness occurs. sent5: the focalness happens and the reprising ostiole does not occur. sent6: that the democratization does not occur is prevented by that the normalness does not occur. sent7: that the non-alopecicness and the non-equestrianness occurs results in that the biocatalyticness does not occur. sent8: that the reprising naturalization does not occur results in that the focalness does not occur and the BAN does not occur. sent9: if that either the scramble does not occur or the ramble occurs or both does not hold then that the biocatalyticness happens is not false. sent10: that the scramble does not occur and/or the ramble prevents the equestrianness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that either the scramble does not occur or the ramble happens or both is wrong.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the biocatalyticness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the development does not occur but the alopecicness happens.; sent5 -> int3: the reprising ostiole does not occur.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: that that the development does not occur and the alopecicness occurs hold is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: either the scramble does not occur or the ramble occurs or both.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the equestrianness does not occur is right.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the normalness does not occur.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__