the freemail occurs.
sent1: if the discountenancing pink does not occur that the Venezuelan and the bigamy happens is wrong. sent2: the latching hypericism does not occur if that both the Venezuelan and the bigamy occurs is not true. sent3: if the Homer occurs that the refreshing does not occur and the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur is not true. sent4: that the Homer occurs and the oophorosalpingectomy occurs does not hold if the refreshing does not occur. sent5: the discountenancing pink does not occur and the quitting does not occur. sent6: that the latching hypericism happens is prevented by the non-Venezuelanness. sent7: that the aweing honeysucker does not occur leads to that the discountenancing pink and/or the quitting occurs. sent8: that the chlorination does not occur is brought about by that the reheating does not occur and/or that the Trojan occurs. sent9: the homeostaticness happens if the exodus occurs. sent10: the Homer happens if the reheating occurs. sent11: that the fact that the refreshing does not occur but the oophorosalpingectomy happens is true is not right if the Homer occurs. sent12: the oxidising does not occur and the Galileanness does not occur. sent13: the quitting does not occur. sent14: if that the refreshing does not occur and the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur is wrong the latching hypericism occurs. sent15: that the Trojanness and the chlorination occurs is brought about by the non-Venezuelanness. sent16: that not the refreshing but the oophorosalpingectomy happens is not correct. sent17: if the Trojan happens the chlorination does not occur. sent18: that the discountenancing pink happens brings about the bigamy. sent19: the aweing honeysucker does not occur if the homeostaticness occurs. sent20: that the refreshing occurs but the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur is incorrect. sent21: the Homer does not occur if the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur and the refreshing occurs. sent22: the fact that the refreshing but not the oophorosalpingectomy occurs is incorrect if the Homer happens. sent23: the latching hypericism happens and the refreshing does not occur if the Trojan occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reheating happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Homer happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the refreshing does not occur and the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur is wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the latching hypericism occurs.; sent5 -> int4: the discountenancing pink does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: that the Venezuelanness occurs and the bigamy occurs does not hold.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the latching hypericism does not occur hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the reheating does not occur.; int8 -> int9: either the reheating does not occur or the Trojanness happens or both.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the chlorination does not occur.;
the freemail does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the freemail occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the discountenancing pink does not occur that the Venezuelan and the bigamy happens is wrong. sent2: the latching hypericism does not occur if that both the Venezuelan and the bigamy occurs is not true. sent3: if the Homer occurs that the refreshing does not occur and the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur is not true. sent4: that the Homer occurs and the oophorosalpingectomy occurs does not hold if the refreshing does not occur. sent5: the discountenancing pink does not occur and the quitting does not occur. sent6: that the latching hypericism happens is prevented by the non-Venezuelanness. sent7: that the aweing honeysucker does not occur leads to that the discountenancing pink and/or the quitting occurs. sent8: that the chlorination does not occur is brought about by that the reheating does not occur and/or that the Trojan occurs. sent9: the homeostaticness happens if the exodus occurs. sent10: the Homer happens if the reheating occurs. sent11: that the fact that the refreshing does not occur but the oophorosalpingectomy happens is true is not right if the Homer occurs. sent12: the oxidising does not occur and the Galileanness does not occur. sent13: the quitting does not occur. sent14: if that the refreshing does not occur and the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur is wrong the latching hypericism occurs. sent15: that the Trojanness and the chlorination occurs is brought about by the non-Venezuelanness. sent16: that not the refreshing but the oophorosalpingectomy happens is not correct. sent17: if the Trojan happens the chlorination does not occur. sent18: that the discountenancing pink happens brings about the bigamy. sent19: the aweing honeysucker does not occur if the homeostaticness occurs. sent20: that the refreshing occurs but the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur is incorrect. sent21: the Homer does not occur if the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur and the refreshing occurs. sent22: the fact that the refreshing but not the oophorosalpingectomy occurs is incorrect if the Homer happens. sent23: the latching hypericism happens and the refreshing does not occur if the Trojan occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reheating happens.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Homer happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the refreshing does not occur and the oophorosalpingectomy does not occur is wrong.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the latching hypericism occurs.; sent5 -> int4: the discountenancing pink does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: that the Venezuelanness occurs and the bigamy occurs does not hold.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: that the latching hypericism does not occur hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the reheating does not occur.; int8 -> int9: either the reheating does not occur or the Trojanness happens or both.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the chlorination does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__