the teapot is reparable.
sent1: if the hyrax targets landed that the cowhide is reparable but it is not a kind of a Angevin is not correct. sent2: there is something such that that it does target landed is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the mite folds Arikara is true if the snuffle is meaningful. sent4: if something does target landed that the teapot is a mismanagement and it is a kind of a Angevin is not true. sent5: if the fugleman is not reparable the teapot is not reparable. sent6: the teapot is not irreparable if it is a Angevin. sent7: if there is something such that it targets landed then the fact that the teapot is a kind of a mismanagement but it is not a Angevin is not right. sent8: either the snuffle is meaningful or it does fold Arikara or both. sent9: the teapot beeps Megachiroptera. sent10: that the teapot is a mismanagement and it is a kind of a Angevin does not hold. sent11: if that something is a mismanagement but it is not a kind of a Angevin is not true it is reparable. sent12: if either the cowhide is not a mismanagement or it is not reparable or both the fugleman is not reparable. sent13: that if the fact that something is reparable but not a Angevin does not hold then it is not reparable is not false.
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: that the fact that the teapot is a kind of a mismanagement that is not a Angevin does not hold is true.; sent11 -> int2: if that the teapot is a mismanagement but it is not a Angevin is wrong it is reparable.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the teapot is not reparable.
sent13 -> int3: if that the cowhide is reparable but it is not a kind of a Angevin is wrong it is not reparable.;
$hypothesis$ = the teapot is reparable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hyrax targets landed that the cowhide is reparable but it is not a kind of a Angevin is not correct. sent2: there is something such that that it does target landed is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the mite folds Arikara is true if the snuffle is meaningful. sent4: if something does target landed that the teapot is a mismanagement and it is a kind of a Angevin is not true. sent5: if the fugleman is not reparable the teapot is not reparable. sent6: the teapot is not irreparable if it is a Angevin. sent7: if there is something such that it targets landed then the fact that the teapot is a kind of a mismanagement but it is not a Angevin is not right. sent8: either the snuffle is meaningful or it does fold Arikara or both. sent9: the teapot beeps Megachiroptera. sent10: that the teapot is a mismanagement and it is a kind of a Angevin does not hold. sent11: if that something is a mismanagement but it is not a kind of a Angevin is not true it is reparable. sent12: if either the cowhide is not a mismanagement or it is not reparable or both the fugleman is not reparable. sent13: that if the fact that something is reparable but not a Angevin does not hold then it is not reparable is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: that the fact that the teapot is a kind of a mismanagement that is not a Angevin does not hold is true.; sent11 -> int2: if that the teapot is a mismanagement but it is not a Angevin is wrong it is reparable.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__