the priming does not occur.
sent1: that the fact that the gestating but not the splatting mentalism happens is incorrect is true. sent2: the finishing novelization does not occur. sent3: the monoclinicness occurs. sent4: the primeness does not occur if the splatting xanthoma does not occur. sent5: the fact that that the carvel-builtness happens and the acinarness occurs is not correct is right if the TKO does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the extrasensoriness happens and the outflanking acinus happens is incorrect the outflanking acinus does not occur. sent7: the fact that that the calcifying and the tweezing happens is not false is wrong if the carvel-builtness does not occur. sent8: the prime does not occur if the fact that both the splatting xanthoma and the non-monoclinicness occurs is false. sent9: the fact that the Mozartianness and the servicing occurs is not right if the arithmeticalness does not occur. sent10: that the outflanking materialist does not occur leads to that both the unpalatableness and the gavotte occurs. sent11: if the fact that the moot and the hydroelectricity happens is false that the outflanking materialist does not occur is right. sent12: if the fact that both the Mozartianness and the servicing happens does not hold the fact that the TKO does not occur is not wrong. sent13: if the tweezing does not occur that the extrasensoriness happens and the outflanking acinus happens does not hold. sent14: the tweezing does not occur if that the calcifying and the tweezing happens is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the moot occurs and the hydroelectricity occurs is not right if the fact that the outflanking acinus does not occur is not wrong. sent16: the splatting xanthoma happens. sent17: the carvel-builtness does not occur if that the carvel-builtness occurs and the acinarness occurs does not hold. sent18: that not the splatting xanthoma but the monoclinicness occurs does not hold if the unpalatableness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the splatting xanthoma and the non-monoclinicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the monoclinicness does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the splatting xanthoma and the non-monoclinicness occurs does not hold.; sent8 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the primeness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the priming does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the gestating but not the splatting mentalism happens is incorrect is true. sent2: the finishing novelization does not occur. sent3: the monoclinicness occurs. sent4: the primeness does not occur if the splatting xanthoma does not occur. sent5: the fact that that the carvel-builtness happens and the acinarness occurs is not correct is right if the TKO does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the extrasensoriness happens and the outflanking acinus happens is incorrect the outflanking acinus does not occur. sent7: the fact that that the calcifying and the tweezing happens is not false is wrong if the carvel-builtness does not occur. sent8: the prime does not occur if the fact that both the splatting xanthoma and the non-monoclinicness occurs is false. sent9: the fact that the Mozartianness and the servicing occurs is not right if the arithmeticalness does not occur. sent10: that the outflanking materialist does not occur leads to that both the unpalatableness and the gavotte occurs. sent11: if the fact that the moot and the hydroelectricity happens is false that the outflanking materialist does not occur is right. sent12: if the fact that both the Mozartianness and the servicing happens does not hold the fact that the TKO does not occur is not wrong. sent13: if the tweezing does not occur that the extrasensoriness happens and the outflanking acinus happens does not hold. sent14: the tweezing does not occur if that the calcifying and the tweezing happens is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the moot occurs and the hydroelectricity occurs is not right if the fact that the outflanking acinus does not occur is not wrong. sent16: the splatting xanthoma happens. sent17: the carvel-builtness does not occur if that the carvel-builtness occurs and the acinarness occurs does not hold. sent18: that not the splatting xanthoma but the monoclinicness occurs does not hold if the unpalatableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the splatting xanthoma and the non-monoclinicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the monoclinicness does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the splatting xanthoma and the non-monoclinicness occurs does not hold.; sent8 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__