the fact that there are non-anasarcous and ceramics things does not hold.
sent1: if the puncture is both a Bahai and anasarcous it does not restore harmonization. sent2: the ramipril is a hearse and is not a kind of a Rastafarian if the puncture does not restore harmonization. sent3: there is something such that it is not anasarcous. sent4: the puncture is ceramics. sent5: if the puncture is not extrusive and is blastodermatic then it is a Bahai. sent6: the ramipril is not a kind of a Rastafarian if the fact that the puncture does not restore harmonization is not false. sent7: if something is not anasarcous the fact that it is non-extrusive is correct. sent8: the puncture is a Bahai if it is extrusive and it is not blastodermatic. sent9: if the puncture is not extrusive and it is not blastodermatic it is a Bahai. sent10: that the ramipril is Rastafarian but it is not anasarcous is not correct. sent11: that the ramipril is a hearse but not Rastafarian is not true. sent12: the puncture is both not extrusive and not blastodermatic. sent13: if the fact that the puncture is both not anasarcous and non-Bahai is incorrect then the pervert is not anasarcous. sent14: there is something such that it is a vivisectionist. sent15: the ramipril is not anasarcous. sent16: that the ramipril is a kind of a hearse and it is a Rastafarian is not correct.
sent9 & sent12 -> int1: the puncture is a kind of a Bahai.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the puncture is anasarcous.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the puncture is not non-Bahai and it is anasarcous.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the puncture does not restore harmonization.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the ramipril is a hearse and is not a Rastafarian.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the puncture is not anasarcous.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the puncture is both not anasarcous and not non-ceramics.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the pervert is not extrusive.
sent7 -> int8: if that the pervert is not anasarcous is not incorrect it is not extrusive.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there are non-anasarcous and ceramics things does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the puncture is both a Bahai and anasarcous it does not restore harmonization. sent2: the ramipril is a hearse and is not a kind of a Rastafarian if the puncture does not restore harmonization. sent3: there is something such that it is not anasarcous. sent4: the puncture is ceramics. sent5: if the puncture is not extrusive and is blastodermatic then it is a Bahai. sent6: the ramipril is not a kind of a Rastafarian if the fact that the puncture does not restore harmonization is not false. sent7: if something is not anasarcous the fact that it is non-extrusive is correct. sent8: the puncture is a Bahai if it is extrusive and it is not blastodermatic. sent9: if the puncture is not extrusive and it is not blastodermatic it is a Bahai. sent10: that the ramipril is Rastafarian but it is not anasarcous is not correct. sent11: that the ramipril is a hearse but not Rastafarian is not true. sent12: the puncture is both not extrusive and not blastodermatic. sent13: if the fact that the puncture is both not anasarcous and non-Bahai is incorrect then the pervert is not anasarcous. sent14: there is something such that it is a vivisectionist. sent15: the ramipril is not anasarcous. sent16: that the ramipril is a kind of a hearse and it is a Rastafarian is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent12 -> int1: the puncture is a kind of a Bahai.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the puncture is anasarcous.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the puncture is not non-Bahai and it is anasarcous.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the puncture does not restore harmonization.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the ramipril is a hearse and is not a Rastafarian.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the puncture is not anasarcous.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the puncture is both not anasarcous and not non-ceramics.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__