the nondriver does not boot akee.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a Mokulu that the Nichrome is not a salsa and it is not a kind of a Calvinist is incorrect. sent2: if there are non-molal things then the fact that the microphage does not boot guyot and it does not boot akee is not correct. sent3: if the nondriver is archaeological it stigmatizes mentality. sent4: that something is molal if the fact that it is not surfacing and it is not a kind of a Libyan is incorrect is correct. sent5: if the microphage boots guyot but it does not boot akee that the Levite does boot akee is not false. sent6: something is not a sixpence if the fact that it is not stingy but a sixpence is incorrect. sent7: the asterism boots fleet and is molal. sent8: the allergist does not permit Dyirbal if there exists something such that it is not a Florio but brachial. sent9: if the nondriver is a sixpence then the fact that that it is not a surfacing and it is not Libyan is not incorrect is not right. sent10: the guyot boots parallelism and is a kind of a Mokulu if the allergist does not permit Dyirbal. sent11: everything is not a kind of an incendiary. sent12: if something is not a sixpence then that it is molal and it is apogamic is false. sent13: if the nondriver is a sixpence that it is both not surfacing and not non-Libyan is not true. sent14: something that is non-incendiary is not a kind of a Florio and is brachial. sent15: the leadwort is not molal if there exists something such that the fact that it is molal and is apogamic does not hold. sent16: the nondriver is a sixpence. sent17: something bumbles insecurity if the fact that it is not a kind of a salsa and it is not a Calvinist does not hold. sent18: if the Nichrome bumbles insecurity then that the Levite is non-stingy a sixpence does not hold. sent19: the nondriver boots guyot. sent20: if something boots guyot and it is molal then that it does not boot akee hold. sent21: The guyot boots nondriver.
sent4 -> int1: if that the nondriver is not a surfacing and not Libyan is not true then it is molal.; sent9 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the nondriver is not a kind of a surfacing and it is not a Libyan is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nondriver is molal.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the nondriver boots guyot and is molal.; sent20 -> int5: if the nondriver boots guyot and is molal then it does not boot akee.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the Levite boots akee.
$hypothesis$ = the nondriver does not boot akee. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a Mokulu that the Nichrome is not a salsa and it is not a kind of a Calvinist is incorrect. sent2: if there are non-molal things then the fact that the microphage does not boot guyot and it does not boot akee is not correct. sent3: if the nondriver is archaeological it stigmatizes mentality. sent4: that something is molal if the fact that it is not surfacing and it is not a kind of a Libyan is incorrect is correct. sent5: if the microphage boots guyot but it does not boot akee that the Levite does boot akee is not false. sent6: something is not a sixpence if the fact that it is not stingy but a sixpence is incorrect. sent7: the asterism boots fleet and is molal. sent8: the allergist does not permit Dyirbal if there exists something such that it is not a Florio but brachial. sent9: if the nondriver is a sixpence then the fact that that it is not a surfacing and it is not Libyan is not incorrect is not right. sent10: the guyot boots parallelism and is a kind of a Mokulu if the allergist does not permit Dyirbal. sent11: everything is not a kind of an incendiary. sent12: if something is not a sixpence then that it is molal and it is apogamic is false. sent13: if the nondriver is a sixpence that it is both not surfacing and not non-Libyan is not true. sent14: something that is non-incendiary is not a kind of a Florio and is brachial. sent15: the leadwort is not molal if there exists something such that the fact that it is molal and is apogamic does not hold. sent16: the nondriver is a sixpence. sent17: something bumbles insecurity if the fact that it is not a kind of a salsa and it is not a Calvinist does not hold. sent18: if the Nichrome bumbles insecurity then that the Levite is non-stingy a sixpence does not hold. sent19: the nondriver boots guyot. sent20: if something boots guyot and it is molal then that it does not boot akee hold. sent21: The guyot boots nondriver. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if that the nondriver is not a surfacing and not Libyan is not true then it is molal.; sent9 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the nondriver is not a kind of a surfacing and it is not a Libyan is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nondriver is molal.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the nondriver boots guyot and is molal.; sent20 -> int5: if the nondriver boots guyot and is molal then it does not boot akee.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__