the wristlet is synaptic.
sent1: if the wristlet is tomentose it is not a invaluableness. sent2: if either the echinus is unidirectional or it does render thickness or both it is not tomentose. sent3: the wristlet is not a kind of a invaluableness if it is either lenten or tomentose or both. sent4: the wristlet is magisterial if it does render endoneurium. sent5: the wristlet is an agnostic. sent6: the mahoe is agnostic and it is a kind of a directness. sent7: the wristlet is lenten if it is heartless. sent8: if something is tomentose then it is normative. sent9: if something is normative it is synaptic. sent10: the wristlet is a kind of an agnostic and it is heartless. sent11: the wristlet is normative if it is not a invaluableness.
sent10 -> int1: the wristlet is heartless.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the wristlet is lenten.; int2 -> int3: the wristlet is lenten or it is tomentose or both.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the wristlet is not a invaluableness is true.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the wristlet is normative.; sent9 -> int6: if the wristlet is normative it is synaptic.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the wristlet is synaptic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wristlet is tomentose it is not a invaluableness. sent2: if either the echinus is unidirectional or it does render thickness or both it is not tomentose. sent3: the wristlet is not a kind of a invaluableness if it is either lenten or tomentose or both. sent4: the wristlet is magisterial if it does render endoneurium. sent5: the wristlet is an agnostic. sent6: the mahoe is agnostic and it is a kind of a directness. sent7: the wristlet is lenten if it is heartless. sent8: if something is tomentose then it is normative. sent9: if something is normative it is synaptic. sent10: the wristlet is a kind of an agnostic and it is heartless. sent11: the wristlet is normative if it is not a invaluableness. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the wristlet is heartless.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the wristlet is lenten.; int2 -> int3: the wristlet is lenten or it is tomentose or both.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the wristlet is not a invaluableness is true.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the wristlet is normative.; sent9 -> int6: if the wristlet is normative it is synaptic.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__