the fact that the seeping occurs is correct.
sent1: that the crusting does not occur yields that the seeping and the yelling occurs. sent2: the indistinguishableness does not occur if the crust occurs and the yelling occurs. sent3: if the seeping occurs then the yelling happens. sent4: that the documentation occurs and the fatherhood does not occur prevents that the indistinguishableness does not occur. sent5: both the intermolecularness and the crust occurs. sent6: the documentation but not the fatherhood occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seeping happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the yelling occurs.; sent5 -> int2: the crust happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crust and the yelling happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the indistinguishableness does not occur.; sent4 & sent6 -> int5: the indistinguishableness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the seeping occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the seeping occurs is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the crusting does not occur yields that the seeping and the yelling occurs. sent2: the indistinguishableness does not occur if the crust occurs and the yelling occurs. sent3: if the seeping occurs then the yelling happens. sent4: that the documentation occurs and the fatherhood does not occur prevents that the indistinguishableness does not occur. sent5: both the intermolecularness and the crust occurs. sent6: the documentation but not the fatherhood occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seeping happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the yelling occurs.; sent5 -> int2: the crust happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crust and the yelling happens.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the indistinguishableness does not occur.; sent4 & sent6 -> int5: the indistinguishableness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__