both the macroeconomicsness and the non-logicalness happens.
sent1: that the walking Gallup and the non-footlessness happens is triggered by that the happiness happens. sent2: the non-macroeconomicsness causes that both the walking Cancer and the happiness happens. sent3: the instructions does not occur if the walking irrigation does not occur and the walking Lie does not occur. sent4: the macroeconomicsness occurs. sent5: that the logicalness does not occur is right if both the walking Gallup and the non-footlessness happens. sent6: the happiness happens. sent7: the macroeconomicsness does not occur if the instructions does not occur. sent8: the footlessness does not occur. sent9: the whistling clavichord occurs. sent10: that the macroeconomicsness happens and the logicalness does not occur does not hold if the happiness does not occur.
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the walking Gallup occurs and the footlessness does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the logicalness does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the walking Cancer but not the extending occurs.
$hypothesis$ = both the macroeconomicsness and the non-logicalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the walking Gallup and the non-footlessness happens is triggered by that the happiness happens. sent2: the non-macroeconomicsness causes that both the walking Cancer and the happiness happens. sent3: the instructions does not occur if the walking irrigation does not occur and the walking Lie does not occur. sent4: the macroeconomicsness occurs. sent5: that the logicalness does not occur is right if both the walking Gallup and the non-footlessness happens. sent6: the happiness happens. sent7: the macroeconomicsness does not occur if the instructions does not occur. sent8: the footlessness does not occur. sent9: the whistling clavichord occurs. sent10: that the macroeconomicsness happens and the logicalness does not occur does not hold if the happiness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the walking Gallup occurs and the footlessness does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the logicalness does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__