both the unimpressiveness and the syncarpousness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the mesentericness occurs and the syncarpousness occurs does not hold. sent2: that the worthlessness occurs and the refacing suborder does not occur is false if the tornado occurs. sent3: if the refacing pawnbroker does not occur the fact that both the refacing adult and the holdout happens is incorrect. sent4: the lidlessness and the unimpressiveness occurs. sent5: that the catapulticness does not occur causes that both the fountain and the granulomatousness occurs. sent6: if the fact that the euphoricness happens and the lidlessness happens is not true then the lidlessness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that both the mesentericness and the non-syncarpousness occurs is not right the syncarpousness occurs. sent8: the fact that the mesentericness happens but the syncarpousness does not occur is not correct. sent9: if that the worthlessness happens but the refacing suborder does not occur is not correct the catapulticness does not occur. sent10: the lidlessness happens. sent11: if the fact that the refacing adult happens and the holdout occurs is wrong the mesentericness does not occur. sent12: that the unimpressiveness and the syncarpousness occurs is incorrect if the fact that the lidlessness does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: if the granulomatousness occurs not the refacing pawnbroker but the apetalousness occurs.
sent4 -> int1: the unimpressiveness happens.; sent7 & sent8 -> int2: the syncarpousness happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that both the unimpressiveness and the syncarpousness happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = both the unimpressiveness and the syncarpousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mesentericness occurs and the syncarpousness occurs does not hold. sent2: that the worthlessness occurs and the refacing suborder does not occur is false if the tornado occurs. sent3: if the refacing pawnbroker does not occur the fact that both the refacing adult and the holdout happens is incorrect. sent4: the lidlessness and the unimpressiveness occurs. sent5: that the catapulticness does not occur causes that both the fountain and the granulomatousness occurs. sent6: if the fact that the euphoricness happens and the lidlessness happens is not true then the lidlessness does not occur. sent7: if the fact that both the mesentericness and the non-syncarpousness occurs is not right the syncarpousness occurs. sent8: the fact that the mesentericness happens but the syncarpousness does not occur is not correct. sent9: if that the worthlessness happens but the refacing suborder does not occur is not correct the catapulticness does not occur. sent10: the lidlessness happens. sent11: if the fact that the refacing adult happens and the holdout occurs is wrong the mesentericness does not occur. sent12: that the unimpressiveness and the syncarpousness occurs is incorrect if the fact that the lidlessness does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: if the granulomatousness occurs not the refacing pawnbroker but the apetalousness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the unimpressiveness happens.; sent7 & sent8 -> int2: the syncarpousness happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__