the dinging Christchurch happens and/or the harmony does not occur.
sent1: if the dinging Burke does not occur then the dinging Christchurch does not occur. sent2: the fact that the cinematicness does not occur and the nonruminantness happens is not correct if the outgeneraling Regalecidae happens. sent3: the headquartering Medawar happens and/or the newness occurs. sent4: the disenfranchisement is triggered by the pneumococcalness. sent5: that the dinging Christchurch happens and/or the harmony does not occur is false if the dinging Burke does not occur. sent6: the embowering does not occur and the disenfranchisement occurs. sent7: if the embowering does not occur then that not the dwelling but the dinging Burke occurs does not hold. sent8: that the mobile happens and the hydropathy occurs is incorrect. sent9: the dwelling does not occur if that the immobileness and the hydropathy occurs is not true. sent10: that both the immobileness and the hydropathy happens is wrong. sent11: that the divisionalness does not occur and the objecting dysarthria occurs does not hold if the coating does not occur. sent12: the dinging Christchurch does not occur. sent13: that not the phlebectomy but the headquartering phone happens is incorrect. sent14: the disenfranchisement happens. sent15: the chelonianness occurs and the pneumococcalness occurs if the outgeneraling portiere does not occur. sent16: the fact that the fact that the Caesarianness and/or the non-backhandness occurs is not right is not wrong. sent17: if the fact that not the cinematicness but the nonruminantness occurs does not hold then the outgeneraling portiere does not occur. sent18: the fact that the conchology does not occur but the phasing happens does not hold if the outgeneraling bough does not occur. sent19: not the deterrence but the headquartering Medawar occurs. sent20: that the conchology occurs or the fiducialness does not occur or both is wrong. sent21: that the dwelling does not occur is brought about by the mobileness. sent22: the outgeneraling Regalecidae happens if the headquartering Medawar occurs.
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the dwelling does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dinging Burke occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the dwelling but the dinging Burke happens.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the embowering does not occur hold.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that not the dwelling but the dinging Burke occurs does not hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the dinging Burke does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the dinging Christchurch occurs and/or the harmony does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the dinging Christchurch happens and/or the harmony does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dinging Burke does not occur then the dinging Christchurch does not occur. sent2: the fact that the cinematicness does not occur and the nonruminantness happens is not correct if the outgeneraling Regalecidae happens. sent3: the headquartering Medawar happens and/or the newness occurs. sent4: the disenfranchisement is triggered by the pneumococcalness. sent5: that the dinging Christchurch happens and/or the harmony does not occur is false if the dinging Burke does not occur. sent6: the embowering does not occur and the disenfranchisement occurs. sent7: if the embowering does not occur then that not the dwelling but the dinging Burke occurs does not hold. sent8: that the mobile happens and the hydropathy occurs is incorrect. sent9: the dwelling does not occur if that the immobileness and the hydropathy occurs is not true. sent10: that both the immobileness and the hydropathy happens is wrong. sent11: that the divisionalness does not occur and the objecting dysarthria occurs does not hold if the coating does not occur. sent12: the dinging Christchurch does not occur. sent13: that not the phlebectomy but the headquartering phone happens is incorrect. sent14: the disenfranchisement happens. sent15: the chelonianness occurs and the pneumococcalness occurs if the outgeneraling portiere does not occur. sent16: the fact that the fact that the Caesarianness and/or the non-backhandness occurs is not right is not wrong. sent17: if the fact that not the cinematicness but the nonruminantness occurs does not hold then the outgeneraling portiere does not occur. sent18: the fact that the conchology does not occur but the phasing happens does not hold if the outgeneraling bough does not occur. sent19: not the deterrence but the headquartering Medawar occurs. sent20: that the conchology occurs or the fiducialness does not occur or both is wrong. sent21: that the dwelling does not occur is brought about by the mobileness. sent22: the outgeneraling Regalecidae happens if the headquartering Medawar occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the dwelling does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dinging Burke occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the dwelling but the dinging Burke happens.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the embowering does not occur hold.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that not the dwelling but the dinging Burke occurs does not hold.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the dinging Burke does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__