that the fact that the Hertzianness or the extralinguisticness or both happens if that the fowling putrescence does not occur hold is not incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: the non-extralinguisticness is prevented by that the glamorization occurs. sent2: if the fowling putrescence does not occur the fact that not the glamorization but the turnaround happens does not hold. sent3: if the fuse does not occur then the fact that both the nonechoicness and the harshness happens is incorrect. sent4: the fact that if that not the glamorization but the turnaround occurs is wrong the extralinguisticness happens is correct. sent5: that the glamorization and the turnaround occurs is not right. sent6: the fact that not the glamorization but the turnaround occurs does not hold if the fowling putrescence happens. sent7: the utility happens and/or the match-up occurs. sent8: either the Hertzianness or the extralinguisticness or both occurs if the fowling putrescence occurs. sent9: the pigmenting Berkeley happens if the fact that not the Pakistani but the unemotionalness occurs is incorrect. sent10: if the fowling putrescence occurs then that the pigmenting crossword does not occur but the differentiating occurs is wrong. sent11: the iridicness happens if that the non-microcephalicness and the lutealness occurs is wrong. sent12: that both the glamorization and the turnaround happens is not correct if the fowling putrescence does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fowling putrescence does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the glamorization does not occur and the turnaround happens is incorrect.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the extralinguisticness happens.; int2 -> int3: the fact that either the Hertzianness occurs or the extralinguisticness occurs or both is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pigmenting crossword does not occur but the differentiating happens is false.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the Hertzianness or the extralinguisticness or both happens if that the fowling putrescence does not occur hold is not incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-extralinguisticness is prevented by that the glamorization occurs. sent2: if the fowling putrescence does not occur the fact that not the glamorization but the turnaround happens does not hold. sent3: if the fuse does not occur then the fact that both the nonechoicness and the harshness happens is incorrect. sent4: the fact that if that not the glamorization but the turnaround occurs is wrong the extralinguisticness happens is correct. sent5: that the glamorization and the turnaround occurs is not right. sent6: the fact that not the glamorization but the turnaround occurs does not hold if the fowling putrescence happens. sent7: the utility happens and/or the match-up occurs. sent8: either the Hertzianness or the extralinguisticness or both occurs if the fowling putrescence occurs. sent9: the pigmenting Berkeley happens if the fact that not the Pakistani but the unemotionalness occurs is incorrect. sent10: if the fowling putrescence occurs then that the pigmenting crossword does not occur but the differentiating occurs is wrong. sent11: the iridicness happens if that the non-microcephalicness and the lutealness occurs is wrong. sent12: that both the glamorization and the turnaround happens is not correct if the fowling putrescence does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fowling putrescence does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the glamorization does not occur and the turnaround happens is incorrect.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the extralinguisticness happens.; int2 -> int3: the fact that either the Hertzianness occurs or the extralinguisticness occurs or both is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__