the fact that if the heckelphone lysogenizes XXY then the telephotograph does not besot cosmopolitan and is a kind of a fucus is incorrect.
sent1: the heckelphone is a fucus. sent2: the telephotograph besots cosmopolitan and it is a kind of a fucus. sent3: if the heckelphone does lysogenize XXY the telephotograph besots cosmopolitan and is a fucus. sent4: the telephotograph is a fucus. sent5: the telephotograph does not besot cosmopolitan and is a fucus if the cosmopolitan is a pearlite. sent6: the cosmopolitan is endergonic thing that is a pearlite if the heckelphone besots cosmopolitan. sent7: something lysogenizes XXY. sent8: the cosmopolitan is a pearlite if something that does lysogenize XXY is endergonic. sent9: the telephotograph is not endergonic but it besots cosmopolitan. sent10: the heckelphone is a kind of a fucus if there exists something such that it is not non-endergonic and not non-center. sent11: the Po centers. sent12: the telephotograph is a fucus if the heckelphone does lysogenize XXY. sent13: that the cosmopolitan is a inaptitude is not false. sent14: the heckelphone is center. sent15: the heckelphone is center and it is endergonic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heckelphone does lysogenize XXY.; sent15 -> int1: the heckelphone is endergonic.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the heckelphone lysogenizes XXY and is endergonic.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it does lysogenize XXY and is endergonic is correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the cosmopolitan is a pearlite.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the telephotograph does not besot cosmopolitan but it is a fucus.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the heckelphone lysogenizes XXY then the telephotograph does not besot cosmopolitan and is a kind of a fucus is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the heckelphone is a fucus. sent2: the telephotograph besots cosmopolitan and it is a kind of a fucus. sent3: if the heckelphone does lysogenize XXY the telephotograph besots cosmopolitan and is a fucus. sent4: the telephotograph is a fucus. sent5: the telephotograph does not besot cosmopolitan and is a fucus if the cosmopolitan is a pearlite. sent6: the cosmopolitan is endergonic thing that is a pearlite if the heckelphone besots cosmopolitan. sent7: something lysogenizes XXY. sent8: the cosmopolitan is a pearlite if something that does lysogenize XXY is endergonic. sent9: the telephotograph is not endergonic but it besots cosmopolitan. sent10: the heckelphone is a kind of a fucus if there exists something such that it is not non-endergonic and not non-center. sent11: the Po centers. sent12: the telephotograph is a fucus if the heckelphone does lysogenize XXY. sent13: that the cosmopolitan is a inaptitude is not false. sent14: the heckelphone is center. sent15: the heckelphone is center and it is endergonic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heckelphone does lysogenize XXY.; sent15 -> int1: the heckelphone is endergonic.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the heckelphone lysogenizes XXY and is endergonic.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it does lysogenize XXY and is endergonic is correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the cosmopolitan is a pearlite.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the telephotograph does not besot cosmopolitan but it is a fucus.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__