there exists something such that it is not a piracy and does not rustle bacteriology.
sent1: something is not a Scottie if that it is not a lamp and it is not a hydrochlorothiazide is not true. sent2: that the plume does box and it does stem is not true. sent3: if something is serious it is not a piracy and it does not rustle bacteriology. sent4: there exists something such that it is a piracy and does not rustle bacteriology. sent5: the moleskin does stem. sent6: if the prospector is a lamp it is not a kind of a Scottie. sent7: if something unspells pathogen it despairs MST. sent8: if something is not prescriptive then the fact that it is a kind of a lamp and it is not a hydrochlorothiazide is not true. sent9: that the prospector is a kind of a lamp that is not a hydrochlorothiazide is wrong. sent10: that something is not a lamp and it is not a hydrochlorothiazide is not true if it is not prescriptive. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that it does not rustle bacteriology is true. sent12: the hatchel unspells pathogen if the fact that the plume is a box but it is not a stem is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the prospector is a kind of a lamp that is not a kind of a hydrochlorothiazide is incorrect if it is not prescriptive. sent14: the moleskin does not rustle bacteriology if it is serious. sent15: if that the hatchel despairs MST is not incorrect the fact that the moleskin is serious is not incorrect. sent16: if the hatchel does rustle bacteriology the moleskin does unspell pathogen. sent17: if something is a lamp then it is not a Scottie. sent18: the fact that the plume boxes and it does stem is not correct if the prospector is not a Scottie. sent19: if that the plume is a stem is not incorrect then the hatchel does unspell pathogen. sent20: if something is serious then it does not rustle bacteriology. sent21: if the hatchel stems then the plume does unspell pathogen. sent22: that the fact that the plume does box but it is not a stem is wrong hold if the prospector is not a Scottie. sent23: the prospector is not prescriptive if it is smokeless. sent24: there is something such that it is not a piracy. sent25: the moleskin does not rustle bacteriology.
sent10 -> int1: that the prospector is not a kind of a lamp and it is not a hydrochlorothiazide is not correct if it is not prescriptive.; sent1 -> int2: the prospector is not a Scottie if the fact that it is not a lamp and is not a hydrochlorothiazide is wrong.; sent7 -> int3: if the hatchel does unspell pathogen then it does despair MST.; sent3 -> int4: if that the moleskin is serious is not false then it is not a piracy and does not rustle bacteriology.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is not a piracy and does not rustle bacteriology. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a Scottie if that it is not a lamp and it is not a hydrochlorothiazide is not true. sent2: that the plume does box and it does stem is not true. sent3: if something is serious it is not a piracy and it does not rustle bacteriology. sent4: there exists something such that it is a piracy and does not rustle bacteriology. sent5: the moleskin does stem. sent6: if the prospector is a lamp it is not a kind of a Scottie. sent7: if something unspells pathogen it despairs MST. sent8: if something is not prescriptive then the fact that it is a kind of a lamp and it is not a hydrochlorothiazide is not true. sent9: that the prospector is a kind of a lamp that is not a hydrochlorothiazide is wrong. sent10: that something is not a lamp and it is not a hydrochlorothiazide is not true if it is not prescriptive. sent11: the fact that there exists something such that it does not rustle bacteriology is true. sent12: the hatchel unspells pathogen if the fact that the plume is a box but it is not a stem is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the prospector is a kind of a lamp that is not a kind of a hydrochlorothiazide is incorrect if it is not prescriptive. sent14: the moleskin does not rustle bacteriology if it is serious. sent15: if that the hatchel despairs MST is not incorrect the fact that the moleskin is serious is not incorrect. sent16: if the hatchel does rustle bacteriology the moleskin does unspell pathogen. sent17: if something is a lamp then it is not a Scottie. sent18: the fact that the plume boxes and it does stem is not correct if the prospector is not a Scottie. sent19: if that the plume is a stem is not incorrect then the hatchel does unspell pathogen. sent20: if something is serious then it does not rustle bacteriology. sent21: if the hatchel stems then the plume does unspell pathogen. sent22: that the fact that the plume does box but it is not a stem is wrong hold if the prospector is not a Scottie. sent23: the prospector is not prescriptive if it is smokeless. sent24: there is something such that it is not a piracy. sent25: the moleskin does not rustle bacteriology. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: that the prospector is not a kind of a lamp and it is not a hydrochlorothiazide is not correct if it is not prescriptive.; sent1 -> int2: the prospector is not a Scottie if the fact that it is not a lamp and is not a hydrochlorothiazide is wrong.; sent7 -> int3: if the hatchel does unspell pathogen then it does despair MST.; sent3 -> int4: if that the moleskin is serious is not false then it is not a piracy and does not rustle bacteriology.; __UNKNOWN__