the tincture is psychosexual and it does appropriate.
sent1: the antipsychotic is splenic. sent2: that the antipsychotic is a rotavirus hold if the roselle is dendritic. sent3: the fact that the roughcast does not lamb Theodosius and it does not turn capful is false. sent4: that the roughcast does not lamb barbarization and it does not turn Parus is not correct. sent5: the roselle is dendritic if something that is a Dubonnet is splenic. sent6: the roughcast is a kind of a Dubonnet if that it does not lamb Theodosius and does not turn capful is incorrect. sent7: the roughcast is splenic and is a kind of a monogyny. sent8: there is something such that it is not a rotavirus. sent9: the fact that the tincture is both psychosexual and appropriate does not hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a rotavirus. sent10: the roughcast is pathological if that the roselle is pathological is right. sent11: if something is not dendritic then the fact that it is both not a monogyny and a Dubonnet is incorrect. sent12: something is a kind of a Dubonnet. sent13: if the roughcast is not dendritic it variegates and is splenic. sent14: either the roselle is not a kind of a rotavirus or it is not dendritic or both.
sent7 -> int1: that the roughcast is splenic is not wrong.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the roughcast is a Dubonnet.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the roughcast is both a Dubonnet and splenic.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Dubonnet that is splenic.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the roselle is dendritic hold.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the antipsychotic is a rotavirus is true.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a rotavirus.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it variegates and it is pathological.
$hypothesis$ = the tincture is psychosexual and it does appropriate. ; $context$ = sent1: the antipsychotic is splenic. sent2: that the antipsychotic is a rotavirus hold if the roselle is dendritic. sent3: the fact that the roughcast does not lamb Theodosius and it does not turn capful is false. sent4: that the roughcast does not lamb barbarization and it does not turn Parus is not correct. sent5: the roselle is dendritic if something that is a Dubonnet is splenic. sent6: the roughcast is a kind of a Dubonnet if that it does not lamb Theodosius and does not turn capful is incorrect. sent7: the roughcast is splenic and is a kind of a monogyny. sent8: there is something such that it is not a rotavirus. sent9: the fact that the tincture is both psychosexual and appropriate does not hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a rotavirus. sent10: the roughcast is pathological if that the roselle is pathological is right. sent11: if something is not dendritic then the fact that it is both not a monogyny and a Dubonnet is incorrect. sent12: something is a kind of a Dubonnet. sent13: if the roughcast is not dendritic it variegates and is splenic. sent14: either the roselle is not a kind of a rotavirus or it is not dendritic or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the roughcast is splenic is not wrong.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the roughcast is a Dubonnet.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the roughcast is both a Dubonnet and splenic.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Dubonnet that is splenic.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the roselle is dendritic hold.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the antipsychotic is a rotavirus is true.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is a rotavirus.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__