the adobo does mask admiration and it does tyrannize Mobius if the chorion is not a kind of a Orizaba.
sent1: the ashcan is dysplastic if the chorion is a kind of a minutes. sent2: The Mobius does tyrannize adobo. sent3: the ashcan is Liechtensteiner and it masks admiration if the adobo is not phrenological. sent4: the chorion is a minutes if the fact that it is not a Orizaba is not wrong. sent5: if there exists something such that it is Liechtensteiner then the ashcan is not a minutes and is phrenological. sent6: the fact that the adobo masks admiration is not wrong if that the remise is both non-Liechtensteiner and not non-phrenological is incorrect. sent7: the adobo does tyrannize Mobius. sent8: the ashcan is a relic. sent9: if the ashcan is not non-phrenological then that the remise is not Liechtensteiner but non-phrenological is not right. sent10: the fact that the remise is a kind of a Liechtensteiner and is phrenological does not hold. sent11: if something is dysplastic it is phrenological.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chorion is not a Orizaba.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the chorion is a kind of a minutes hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ashcan is dysplastic.; sent11 -> int3: if the ashcan is dysplastic then it is phrenological.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ashcan is phrenological.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the remise is not a Liechtensteiner but phrenological does not hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the adobo does mask admiration.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the adobo does mask admiration and it does tyrannize Mobius.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the chorion is dysplastic.
$hypothesis$ = the adobo does mask admiration and it does tyrannize Mobius if the chorion is not a kind of a Orizaba. ; $context$ = sent1: the ashcan is dysplastic if the chorion is a kind of a minutes. sent2: The Mobius does tyrannize adobo. sent3: the ashcan is Liechtensteiner and it masks admiration if the adobo is not phrenological. sent4: the chorion is a minutes if the fact that it is not a Orizaba is not wrong. sent5: if there exists something such that it is Liechtensteiner then the ashcan is not a minutes and is phrenological. sent6: the fact that the adobo masks admiration is not wrong if that the remise is both non-Liechtensteiner and not non-phrenological is incorrect. sent7: the adobo does tyrannize Mobius. sent8: the ashcan is a relic. sent9: if the ashcan is not non-phrenological then that the remise is not Liechtensteiner but non-phrenological is not right. sent10: the fact that the remise is a kind of a Liechtensteiner and is phrenological does not hold. sent11: if something is dysplastic it is phrenological. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chorion is not a Orizaba.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: that the chorion is a kind of a minutes hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the ashcan is dysplastic.; sent11 -> int3: if the ashcan is dysplastic then it is phrenological.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ashcan is phrenological.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the remise is not a Liechtensteiner but phrenological does not hold.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the adobo does mask admiration.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the adobo does mask admiration and it does tyrannize Mobius.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__