the fact that the introvert is hymenopterous and it is a Lemaitre is not true.
sent1: if the figwort is cheap it is both not a doxology and not a lunula. sent2: the fact that something is cheap but it is not an ergot is incorrect if it is not a kind of a doxology. sent3: if something is not a doxology that it is hymenopterous and it is a Lemaitre is wrong. sent4: that something is cheap and is an ergot is not right if it is not a doxology. sent5: the introvert is hymenopterous if the fact that that the stole is cheap but it is not a kind of an ergot is right is not correct. sent6: the fact that the stole is both cheap and an ergot is not correct. sent7: if the stole is not a doxology then the fact that it is both cheap and an ergot is not correct. sent8: the introvert is a Lemaitre. sent9: the introvert is a doxology. sent10: something does barb walkie-talkie. sent11: the introvert is hymenopterous if that the stole is an ergot is not incorrect. sent12: the landmass is a lunula. sent13: the introvert is a lunula. sent14: that the figwort is not a lunula is not false. sent15: the figwort is a lunula if the stole is a kind of a doxology.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the stole is a doxology hold.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the figwort is a kind of a lunula.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the stole is not a doxology.; sent2 -> int4: if the stole is not a doxology that it is cheap and it is not an ergot is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the stole is cheap but it is not an ergot does not hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the introvert is hymenopterous.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the introvert is hymenopterous and is a kind of a Lemaitre is not right.
sent3 -> int7: that the introvert is hymenopterous a Lemaitre does not hold if it is not a kind of a doxology.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the introvert is hymenopterous and it is a Lemaitre is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the figwort is cheap it is both not a doxology and not a lunula. sent2: the fact that something is cheap but it is not an ergot is incorrect if it is not a kind of a doxology. sent3: if something is not a doxology that it is hymenopterous and it is a Lemaitre is wrong. sent4: that something is cheap and is an ergot is not right if it is not a doxology. sent5: the introvert is hymenopterous if the fact that that the stole is cheap but it is not a kind of an ergot is right is not correct. sent6: the fact that the stole is both cheap and an ergot is not correct. sent7: if the stole is not a doxology then the fact that it is both cheap and an ergot is not correct. sent8: the introvert is a Lemaitre. sent9: the introvert is a doxology. sent10: something does barb walkie-talkie. sent11: the introvert is hymenopterous if that the stole is an ergot is not incorrect. sent12: the landmass is a lunula. sent13: the introvert is a lunula. sent14: that the figwort is not a lunula is not false. sent15: the figwort is a lunula if the stole is a kind of a doxology. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the stole is a doxology hold.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the figwort is a kind of a lunula.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the stole is not a doxology.; sent2 -> int4: if the stole is not a doxology that it is cheap and it is not an ergot is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the stole is cheap but it is not an ergot does not hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the introvert is hymenopterous.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__