that there exists something such that it is not a agrobiology and it does not devein hybridoma is right.
sent1: if the fact that something hums Palatine and hums mauve does not hold then it does not hums mauve. sent2: there is something such that it is a agrobiology and it does not devein hybridoma. sent3: the agglomerator does not devein hybridoma and it is not unsanitary. sent4: if the fact that the effluent is not a agrobiology is not false then the piperin is not a kind of a agrobiology and does not devein hybridoma. sent5: something does not devein hybridoma if that it is not a hisser and deveins menthol is not true. sent6: that something is not a hisser and deveins menthol is wrong if it does not hum mauve. sent7: if that the piperin does not devein hybridoma is right the effluent does not devein hybridoma and is not institutional. sent8: the piperin is not a kind of a agrobiology. sent9: the fact that the calcification is institutional thing that is a agrobiology is true if the effluent does not devein hybridoma. sent10: if the effluent is a kind of a agrobiology it is institutional. sent11: the piperin is not a centrality. sent12: there exists something such that it does not devein hybridoma. sent13: the effluent is not institutional.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the effluent is a kind of a agrobiology.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the effluent is institutional.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the effluent is not a kind of a agrobiology.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the piperin is not a agrobiology and does not devein hybridoma.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the calcification is institutional.
sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the fact that the effluent is not a kind of a hisser but it does devein menthol is incorrect is right that it does not devein hybridoma is true.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that the effluent is not a kind of a hisser but it deveins menthol is false if it does not hum mauve.; sent1 -> int7: the effluent does not hum mauve if the fact that it hums Palatine and does hum mauve is not true.; sent11 -> int8: something is not a centrality.;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that it is not a agrobiology and it does not devein hybridoma is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something hums Palatine and hums mauve does not hold then it does not hums mauve. sent2: there is something such that it is a agrobiology and it does not devein hybridoma. sent3: the agglomerator does not devein hybridoma and it is not unsanitary. sent4: if the fact that the effluent is not a agrobiology is not false then the piperin is not a kind of a agrobiology and does not devein hybridoma. sent5: something does not devein hybridoma if that it is not a hisser and deveins menthol is not true. sent6: that something is not a hisser and deveins menthol is wrong if it does not hum mauve. sent7: if that the piperin does not devein hybridoma is right the effluent does not devein hybridoma and is not institutional. sent8: the piperin is not a kind of a agrobiology. sent9: the fact that the calcification is institutional thing that is a agrobiology is true if the effluent does not devein hybridoma. sent10: if the effluent is a kind of a agrobiology it is institutional. sent11: the piperin is not a centrality. sent12: there exists something such that it does not devein hybridoma. sent13: the effluent is not institutional. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the effluent is a kind of a agrobiology.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the effluent is institutional.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the effluent is not a kind of a agrobiology.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the piperin is not a agrobiology and does not devein hybridoma.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__