there is something such that the fact that it does not bracket and does kid does not hold.
sent1: something is expensive if it flocks Chimborazo. sent2: if the Guaiacum is non-qualitative the fact that it does not begin and is medullary does not hold. sent3: if the gangliocyte is expensive the fact that it demises and it is not enthusiastic does not hold. sent4: something is both perishable and a cutin. sent5: that the Guaiacum is not allergenic but it is paschal is not true. sent6: that the Chesterfield is a kid and it is a kind of a hypodermic does not hold if it is not a kind of a contestant. sent7: the fact that the Guaiacum is not a brocket but it is not non-comatose is not correct if it is not a bracket. sent8: that something is paschal or not opportune or both is not right if that it does not demise is true. sent9: there exists something such that it is non-paschal thing that is a kind of a kid. sent10: the fact that the Guaiacum does not bracket but it is a kind of a kid does not hold if it is not paschal. sent11: the Sharpie is not paschal if that the Guaiacum is paschal or not opportune or both does not hold. sent12: the waker is not paschal. sent13: everything flocks Chimborazo and it is a lingual.
the Sharpie is not paschal.
sent8 -> int1: that the Guaiacum is paschal or it is not opportune or both is not true if that it does not demise is not wrong.; sent1 -> int2: if the gangliocyte flocks Chimborazo it is expensive.; sent13 -> int3: the gangliocyte flocks Chimborazo and is lingual.; int3 -> int4: the gangliocyte flocks Chimborazo.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the gangliocyte is expensive.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that that the gangliocyte does demise but it is not enthusiastic is not true is not wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it does demise and it is not enthusiastic is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it does not bracket and does kid does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is expensive if it flocks Chimborazo. sent2: if the Guaiacum is non-qualitative the fact that it does not begin and is medullary does not hold. sent3: if the gangliocyte is expensive the fact that it demises and it is not enthusiastic does not hold. sent4: something is both perishable and a cutin. sent5: that the Guaiacum is not allergenic but it is paschal is not true. sent6: that the Chesterfield is a kid and it is a kind of a hypodermic does not hold if it is not a kind of a contestant. sent7: the fact that the Guaiacum is not a brocket but it is not non-comatose is not correct if it is not a bracket. sent8: that something is paschal or not opportune or both is not right if that it does not demise is true. sent9: there exists something such that it is non-paschal thing that is a kind of a kid. sent10: the fact that the Guaiacum does not bracket but it is a kind of a kid does not hold if it is not paschal. sent11: the Sharpie is not paschal if that the Guaiacum is paschal or not opportune or both does not hold. sent12: the waker is not paschal. sent13: everything flocks Chimborazo and it is a lingual. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__