the fact that if the toddler does not foreshow Isaiah the tyrant is not semantic does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the tyrant is not a belle is true. sent2: the fact that something is not semantic or is a caravansary or both is wrong if it does not lave. sent3: there is something such that that the fact that it either is a kind of a Isaiah or is a scrape or both is correct is not true. sent4: the toddler is not catalatic. sent5: the tyrant is semantic. sent6: the toddler is not semantic. sent7: that something does not lave and/or it is a caravansary is not right if the fact that it does not foreshow Isaiah is true. sent8: that there is something such that that it is not diaphyseal and/or it doctors ascolichen does not hold hold. sent9: if there is something such that that it does not lave and/or is a caravansary is incorrect then the tyrant is not semantic. sent10: the toddler foreshows Isaiah if the tyrant is not a caravansary. sent11: the tyrant is a caravansary if the toddler is not semantic. sent12: the toddler is not semantic if that the tyrant laves is right. sent13: that the tyrant is not semantic or it laves or both does not hold if it does not foreshow Isaiah. sent14: the toddler is semantic if the fact that the tyrant does not lave hold. sent15: there exists something such that it laves. sent16: there is something such that it does not lave or it is a caravansary or both.
sent7 -> int1: if the toddler does not foreshow Isaiah then the fact that that either it does not lave or it is a caravansary or both is not wrong is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the toddler does not foreshow Isaiah hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that either the toddler does not lave or it is a caravansary or both does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it does not lave or it is a caravansary or both is not right.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the tyrant is not semantic.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the toddler does not foreshow Isaiah the tyrant is not semantic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the tyrant is not a belle is true. sent2: the fact that something is not semantic or is a caravansary or both is wrong if it does not lave. sent3: there is something such that that the fact that it either is a kind of a Isaiah or is a scrape or both is correct is not true. sent4: the toddler is not catalatic. sent5: the tyrant is semantic. sent6: the toddler is not semantic. sent7: that something does not lave and/or it is a caravansary is not right if the fact that it does not foreshow Isaiah is true. sent8: that there is something such that that it is not diaphyseal and/or it doctors ascolichen does not hold hold. sent9: if there is something such that that it does not lave and/or is a caravansary is incorrect then the tyrant is not semantic. sent10: the toddler foreshows Isaiah if the tyrant is not a caravansary. sent11: the tyrant is a caravansary if the toddler is not semantic. sent12: the toddler is not semantic if that the tyrant laves is right. sent13: that the tyrant is not semantic or it laves or both does not hold if it does not foreshow Isaiah. sent14: the toddler is semantic if the fact that the tyrant does not lave hold. sent15: there exists something such that it laves. sent16: there is something such that it does not lave or it is a caravansary or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the toddler does not foreshow Isaiah then the fact that that either it does not lave or it is a caravansary or both is not wrong is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the toddler does not foreshow Isaiah hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that either the toddler does not lave or it is a caravansary or both does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it does not lave or it is a caravansary or both is not right.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the tyrant is not semantic.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__