the wiglessness does not occur.
sent1: the wiglessness is prevented by that the jamming occurs and the inaudibleness occurs. sent2: if the clocking happens then the insubstantialness occurs but the fenestration does not occur. sent3: the fact that the insubstantialness happens but the clocking does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the angling happens. sent5: the laicizing cognate occurs if not the laicizing Bardeen but the vacating biochip occurs. sent6: if the insubstantialness does not occur but the laicizing patty happens then the jamming occurs. sent7: if the tubercularness happens the laicizing patty does not occur and the inaudibleness does not occur. sent8: the wear happens. sent9: the laicizing SEAL does not occur. sent10: the commonsness does not occur. sent11: the someness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the inaudibleness happens is right. sent13: the noness happens. sent14: the clock does not occur. sent15: both the Fabian and the bombshell occurs. sent16: if the laicizing patty does not occur then the fact that the jamming happens but the clock does not occur is wrong. sent17: the vacating hairgrip does not occur. sent18: the laicizing patty occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the insubstantialness occurs.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the insubstantialness but not the clocking happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the insubstantialness does not occur.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the substantialness and the laicizing patty happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the jamming happens.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that both the jamming and the inaudibleness happens is not incorrect.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fenestration does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the wiglessness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the wiglessness is prevented by that the jamming occurs and the inaudibleness occurs. sent2: if the clocking happens then the insubstantialness occurs but the fenestration does not occur. sent3: the fact that the insubstantialness happens but the clocking does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the angling happens. sent5: the laicizing cognate occurs if not the laicizing Bardeen but the vacating biochip occurs. sent6: if the insubstantialness does not occur but the laicizing patty happens then the jamming occurs. sent7: if the tubercularness happens the laicizing patty does not occur and the inaudibleness does not occur. sent8: the wear happens. sent9: the laicizing SEAL does not occur. sent10: the commonsness does not occur. sent11: the someness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the inaudibleness happens is right. sent13: the noness happens. sent14: the clock does not occur. sent15: both the Fabian and the bombshell occurs. sent16: if the laicizing patty does not occur then the fact that the jamming happens but the clock does not occur is wrong. sent17: the vacating hairgrip does not occur. sent18: the laicizing patty occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the insubstantialness occurs.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the insubstantialness but not the clocking happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the insubstantialness does not occur.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the substantialness and the laicizing patty happens.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the jamming happens.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that both the jamming and the inaudibleness happens is not incorrect.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__