the fact that there exists something such that it is a kind of a epiphenomenon that finalizes Coluber is wrong.
sent1: the Jacobean is a kind of a ICBM. sent2: the Norinyl is a kind of a epiphenomenon if the saddleback is a ICBM. sent3: if that the Norinyl is both not a causing and not a thatch is false then the fact that the Eureka does not causing is not wrong. sent4: if the Jacobean is unobtrusive it is a thatch. sent5: that the Eureka is not a thatch and not a causing is wrong. sent6: the Eureka either is a thatch or is a kind of a epiphenomenon or both. sent7: the firebrat is extroversive a flexibility. sent8: the firebrat is a thatch and/or it is extroversive if the Eureka is not a causing. sent9: if that the Norinyl does not finalize Coluber and it is not extroversive is not right then the firebrat does not finalize Coluber. sent10: the firebrat upholds continuation and it is a Waugh. sent11: the fact that the firebrat is not extroversive is correct if the saddleback is extroversive. sent12: the Eureka does not criticize autogamy. sent13: something is unobtrusive and it is a ICBM. sent14: the Jacobean is predicative. sent15: if there is something such that it is not a Waugh the fact that the firebrat is frivolous and is extroversive does not hold. sent16: something is not a kind of a Waugh. sent17: if the fact that the Eureka does not thatch and it does not cause does not hold the Jacobean is not a thatch. sent18: if the Jacobean is not unobtrusive either the saddleback is a ICBM or it is predicative or both. sent19: the Norinyl finalizes Coluber if the firebrat does not finalizes Coluber. sent20: if the fact that the saddleback is not a kind of a causing is right the Eureka thatches or it is predicative or both. sent21: the firebrat is not a epiphenomenon if it does not finalize Coluber. sent22: if the fact that something is frivolous and is extroversive is not correct then it does not finalize Coluber. sent23: the Norinyl is a kind of a epiphenomenon if the saddleback is predicative. sent24: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a nonpayment is not false. sent25: the saddleback is not adducent. sent26: if that something is not a kind of a ICBM is not incorrect it is not a thatch. sent27: that the Norinyl is not a ICBM is not wrong. sent28: if the Eureka is a epiphenomenon then the Norinyl is a kind of a causing.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jacobean is unobtrusive.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Jacobean does thatch.; sent17 & sent5 -> int2: the Jacobean is not a thatch.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Jacobean is not unobtrusive.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the saddleback is a kind of a ICBM and/or it is predicative.; int5 & sent2 & sent23 -> int6: the Norinyl is a kind of a epiphenomenon.; sent22 -> int7: the fact that the firebrat does not finalize Coluber is not wrong if the fact that it is frivolous and is extroversive is not right.; sent16 & sent15 -> int8: the fact that the firebrat is frivolous and it is extroversive is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the firebrat does not finalize Coluber.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the Norinyl does finalize Coluber.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Norinyl is a kind of a epiphenomenon and it finalizes Coluber.; int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is a kind of a epiphenomenon that finalizes Coluber is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Jacobean is a kind of a ICBM. sent2: the Norinyl is a kind of a epiphenomenon if the saddleback is a ICBM. sent3: if that the Norinyl is both not a causing and not a thatch is false then the fact that the Eureka does not causing is not wrong. sent4: if the Jacobean is unobtrusive it is a thatch. sent5: that the Eureka is not a thatch and not a causing is wrong. sent6: the Eureka either is a thatch or is a kind of a epiphenomenon or both. sent7: the firebrat is extroversive a flexibility. sent8: the firebrat is a thatch and/or it is extroversive if the Eureka is not a causing. sent9: if that the Norinyl does not finalize Coluber and it is not extroversive is not right then the firebrat does not finalize Coluber. sent10: the firebrat upholds continuation and it is a Waugh. sent11: the fact that the firebrat is not extroversive is correct if the saddleback is extroversive. sent12: the Eureka does not criticize autogamy. sent13: something is unobtrusive and it is a ICBM. sent14: the Jacobean is predicative. sent15: if there is something such that it is not a Waugh the fact that the firebrat is frivolous and is extroversive does not hold. sent16: something is not a kind of a Waugh. sent17: if the fact that the Eureka does not thatch and it does not cause does not hold the Jacobean is not a thatch. sent18: if the Jacobean is not unobtrusive either the saddleback is a ICBM or it is predicative or both. sent19: the Norinyl finalizes Coluber if the firebrat does not finalizes Coluber. sent20: if the fact that the saddleback is not a kind of a causing is right the Eureka thatches or it is predicative or both. sent21: the firebrat is not a epiphenomenon if it does not finalize Coluber. sent22: if the fact that something is frivolous and is extroversive is not correct then it does not finalize Coluber. sent23: the Norinyl is a kind of a epiphenomenon if the saddleback is predicative. sent24: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a nonpayment is not false. sent25: the saddleback is not adducent. sent26: if that something is not a kind of a ICBM is not incorrect it is not a thatch. sent27: that the Norinyl is not a ICBM is not wrong. sent28: if the Eureka is a epiphenomenon then the Norinyl is a kind of a causing. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Jacobean is unobtrusive.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the Jacobean does thatch.; sent17 & sent5 -> int2: the Jacobean is not a thatch.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Jacobean is not unobtrusive.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the saddleback is a kind of a ICBM and/or it is predicative.; int5 & sent2 & sent23 -> int6: the Norinyl is a kind of a epiphenomenon.; sent22 -> int7: the fact that the firebrat does not finalize Coluber is not wrong if the fact that it is frivolous and is extroversive is not right.; sent16 & sent15 -> int8: the fact that the firebrat is frivolous and it is extroversive is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the firebrat does not finalize Coluber.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the Norinyl does finalize Coluber.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Norinyl is a kind of a epiphenomenon and it finalizes Coluber.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__