the shell archaizes.
sent1: the cruet-stand is not a kind of a Lothario. sent2: the Czechoslovakian does not relocate. sent3: if the cruet-stand archaizes then the shell does archaizes. sent4: if the cruet-stand is diffused the shell does diffused. sent5: that if that the lidar is not the conventicle and it is non-mass-spectrometric does not hold then that the lidar is not isotropic is not false is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the Shahaptian does gas and it does tease Anabaptism is false if the lidar is not isotropic. sent7: the cruet-stand does diffuse if the fact that it does not relocate and does not tease Anabaptism is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that that the sawdust is not an agnostic and does not tease Anabaptism does not hold hold it is a chap. sent9: that the cruet-stand is isotropic thing that does not tease Anabaptism is wrong. sent10: the shell teases swatch and is intolerable. sent11: the BASIC does diffuse if that it is not a kind of a slavery and it does not solemnize billfish is wrong. sent12: the cruet-stand is diffused. sent13: the fact that the cruet-stand does not solemnize bowling if the fact that the Shahaptian does diffuse and it solemnize bowling is false is not false. sent14: the kimono is a kind of a clothesline that is a Lothario. sent15: if the shell does not tease Anabaptism it does archaize. sent16: if that the Shahaptian is a gas that does tease Anabaptism is not true it does not tease Anabaptism. sent17: the fact that that the shell does not relocate and is not a kind of the coonskin is incorrect if the fact that the shell does not solemnize bowling is not false is right. sent18: the fact that the shell does not relocate and is a coonskin is wrong. sent19: the fact that the fact that something diffuses and it solemnizes bowling is not right if it does not tease Anabaptism is not incorrect. sent20: the shell is a Lothario if it is a coonskin. sent21: if the shell does not solemnize bowling the fact that it does not relocate and it is a coonskin is not right. sent22: if the cruet-stand solemnizes bowling then the shell does solemnizes bowling. sent23: if that the shell does not relocate and it is not a kind of a coonskin is not correct it is a Lothario. sent24: the shell does not solemnize bowling. sent25: the fact that the cruet-stand does not haze Galium and does not diffuse is not correct if it is not a Activase. sent26: The bowling does not solemnize shell. sent27: if the shell is a Lothario and it is diffused it does not tease Anabaptism.
sent17 & sent24 -> int1: that the shell does not relocate and it is not a kind of a coonskin does not hold.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the shell is a Lothario.; sent4 & sent12 -> int3: the shell does diffuse.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the shell is a Lothario that diffuses.; int4 & sent27 -> int5: that the shell does not tease Anabaptism hold.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
that the shell does not archaize is not false.
sent19 -> int6: the fact that the Shahaptian is diffused and does solemnize bowling is false if it does not tease Anabaptism.;
$hypothesis$ = the shell archaizes. ; $context$ = sent1: the cruet-stand is not a kind of a Lothario. sent2: the Czechoslovakian does not relocate. sent3: if the cruet-stand archaizes then the shell does archaizes. sent4: if the cruet-stand is diffused the shell does diffused. sent5: that if that the lidar is not the conventicle and it is non-mass-spectrometric does not hold then that the lidar is not isotropic is not false is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the Shahaptian does gas and it does tease Anabaptism is false if the lidar is not isotropic. sent7: the cruet-stand does diffuse if the fact that it does not relocate and does not tease Anabaptism is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that that the sawdust is not an agnostic and does not tease Anabaptism does not hold hold it is a chap. sent9: that the cruet-stand is isotropic thing that does not tease Anabaptism is wrong. sent10: the shell teases swatch and is intolerable. sent11: the BASIC does diffuse if that it is not a kind of a slavery and it does not solemnize billfish is wrong. sent12: the cruet-stand is diffused. sent13: the fact that the cruet-stand does not solemnize bowling if the fact that the Shahaptian does diffuse and it solemnize bowling is false is not false. sent14: the kimono is a kind of a clothesline that is a Lothario. sent15: if the shell does not tease Anabaptism it does archaize. sent16: if that the Shahaptian is a gas that does tease Anabaptism is not true it does not tease Anabaptism. sent17: the fact that that the shell does not relocate and is not a kind of the coonskin is incorrect if the fact that the shell does not solemnize bowling is not false is right. sent18: the fact that the shell does not relocate and is a coonskin is wrong. sent19: the fact that the fact that something diffuses and it solemnizes bowling is not right if it does not tease Anabaptism is not incorrect. sent20: the shell is a Lothario if it is a coonskin. sent21: if the shell does not solemnize bowling the fact that it does not relocate and it is a coonskin is not right. sent22: if the cruet-stand solemnizes bowling then the shell does solemnizes bowling. sent23: if that the shell does not relocate and it is not a kind of a coonskin is not correct it is a Lothario. sent24: the shell does not solemnize bowling. sent25: the fact that the cruet-stand does not haze Galium and does not diffuse is not correct if it is not a Activase. sent26: The bowling does not solemnize shell. sent27: if the shell is a Lothario and it is diffused it does not tease Anabaptism. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent24 -> int1: that the shell does not relocate and it is not a kind of a coonskin does not hold.; int1 & sent23 -> int2: the shell is a Lothario.; sent4 & sent12 -> int3: the shell does diffuse.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the shell is a Lothario that diffuses.; int4 & sent27 -> int5: that the shell does not tease Anabaptism hold.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__