the admonisher does not contemplate octane but it is a kind of a urochord.
sent1: the admonisher is non-sudden. sent2: the admonisher replaces but it is not subscript if it is not sudden. sent3: the fact that the admonisher is a Spalax hold. sent4: the fact that something is both a urochord and a Psalm is true if that it does not contemplate Burhinus is not wrong. sent5: something does not contemplate octane if it is a eclat and it is a Spalax. sent6: if that the admonisher pushes xanthophyll but it is not a kind of a sample is not true then it is not a Psalm. sent7: the fact that the admonisher does push xanthophyll and does not sample is not right. sent8: if something is not a kind of a subscript then it is a eclat. sent9: if something is not a kind of a Psalm then the fact that it does not contemplate octane and it is a urochord is not right. sent10: either everything is a urochord or it is not a Psalm or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Psalm the admonisher does not contemplate octane. sent12: if the fact that the admonisher does sample is right it is not a Psalm. sent13: the fact that the admonisher does not push Rochambeau and is autotelic is false.
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the admonisher is not a Psalm is true.; sent9 -> int2: if the admonisher is not a Psalm that it does not contemplate octane and is a urochord is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the villain is not atomistic but it does suffer is false.
sent10 -> int3: the octane either is a urochord or is not a kind of a Psalm or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the admonisher does not contemplate octane but it is a kind of a urochord. ; $context$ = sent1: the admonisher is non-sudden. sent2: the admonisher replaces but it is not subscript if it is not sudden. sent3: the fact that the admonisher is a Spalax hold. sent4: the fact that something is both a urochord and a Psalm is true if that it does not contemplate Burhinus is not wrong. sent5: something does not contemplate octane if it is a eclat and it is a Spalax. sent6: if that the admonisher pushes xanthophyll but it is not a kind of a sample is not true then it is not a Psalm. sent7: the fact that the admonisher does push xanthophyll and does not sample is not right. sent8: if something is not a kind of a subscript then it is a eclat. sent9: if something is not a kind of a Psalm then the fact that it does not contemplate octane and it is a urochord is not right. sent10: either everything is a urochord or it is not a Psalm or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Psalm the admonisher does not contemplate octane. sent12: if the fact that the admonisher does sample is right it is not a Psalm. sent13: the fact that the admonisher does not push Rochambeau and is autotelic is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the admonisher is not a Psalm is true.; sent9 -> int2: if the admonisher is not a Psalm that it does not contemplate octane and is a urochord is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__