the nectarine does not untune deckled and it does not debar collision.
sent1: if the LP does not debar collision that the nectarine does not untune deckled and it does not debar collision is not correct. sent2: that the marginalization is clamatorial hold. sent3: if the fact that that the brewery is both not clamatorial and not antemeridian hold is false the nectarine does manoeuver. sent4: if the marginalization is antemeridian thing that is clamatorial the LP does not debar collision. sent5: that something is not clamatorial and is not antemeridian is wrong if it does not debar Peron. sent6: the marginalization is antemeridian if the brewery does manoeuver. sent7: the brewery manoeuvers. sent8: something does not untune deckled and it does not debar collision if it does manoeuver. sent9: if the fact that the brewery is not top-down and debars Peron is not correct that it does not debars Peron hold.
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the marginalization is antemeridian.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the marginalization is both antemeridian and clamatorial.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the LP does not debar collision.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the nectarine does not untune deckled and it does not debar collision.
sent8 -> int4: the nectarine does not untune deckled and does not debar collision if it does manoeuver.; sent5 -> int5: the fact that the brewery is non-clamatorial thing that is not antemeridian is false if it does not debar Peron.;
$hypothesis$ = the nectarine does not untune deckled and it does not debar collision. ; $context$ = sent1: if the LP does not debar collision that the nectarine does not untune deckled and it does not debar collision is not correct. sent2: that the marginalization is clamatorial hold. sent3: if the fact that that the brewery is both not clamatorial and not antemeridian hold is false the nectarine does manoeuver. sent4: if the marginalization is antemeridian thing that is clamatorial the LP does not debar collision. sent5: that something is not clamatorial and is not antemeridian is wrong if it does not debar Peron. sent6: the marginalization is antemeridian if the brewery does manoeuver. sent7: the brewery manoeuvers. sent8: something does not untune deckled and it does not debar collision if it does manoeuver. sent9: if the fact that the brewery is not top-down and debars Peron is not correct that it does not debars Peron hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the marginalization is antemeridian.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the marginalization is both antemeridian and clamatorial.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the LP does not debar collision.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__