both the non-dialectalness and the sinning occurs.
sent1: if the stopping occurs then that the khamsin but not the predictableness happens does not hold. sent2: if the insentientness does not occur then both the sinning and the ironing happens. sent3: the dialectalness is prevented by that the debarring disease occurs or the desecrating Helxine happens or both. sent4: the physiologicalness does not occur. sent5: that both the quivering and the domiciliariness occurs prevents the aligning. sent6: the quivering happens. sent7: if the trustfulness happens that the grouping opener happens and the aligning does not occur is not right. sent8: both the untuning quarterlight and the grouping mispronunciation happens if the tractableness does not occur. sent9: the desecrating Stizostedion does not occur. sent10: the resinlikeness and the non-insentientness happens. sent11: the fact that the aligning occurs is not false if that that the grouping opener happens but the aligning does not occur is correct is false. sent12: the trustfulness happens. sent13: the untuning mispronunciation occurs if that that the branchiateness but not the untuning mispronunciation occurs is true is not right. sent14: that both the melioration and the non-medicolegalness occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the domiciliariness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the quiver occurs and the domiciliariness happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the aligning does not occur.; sent7 & sent12 -> int3: that the grouping opener occurs but the aligning does not occur is not right.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: the aligning occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the domiciliariness does not occur.; sent10 -> int7: the insentientness does not occur.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the sinning and the ironing occurs.; int8 -> int9: the sinning happens.;
$hypothesis$ = both the non-dialectalness and the sinning occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stopping occurs then that the khamsin but not the predictableness happens does not hold. sent2: if the insentientness does not occur then both the sinning and the ironing happens. sent3: the dialectalness is prevented by that the debarring disease occurs or the desecrating Helxine happens or both. sent4: the physiologicalness does not occur. sent5: that both the quivering and the domiciliariness occurs prevents the aligning. sent6: the quivering happens. sent7: if the trustfulness happens that the grouping opener happens and the aligning does not occur is not right. sent8: both the untuning quarterlight and the grouping mispronunciation happens if the tractableness does not occur. sent9: the desecrating Stizostedion does not occur. sent10: the resinlikeness and the non-insentientness happens. sent11: the fact that the aligning occurs is not false if that that the grouping opener happens but the aligning does not occur is correct is false. sent12: the trustfulness happens. sent13: the untuning mispronunciation occurs if that that the branchiateness but not the untuning mispronunciation occurs is true is not right. sent14: that both the melioration and the non-medicolegalness occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the domiciliariness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the quiver occurs and the domiciliariness happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the aligning does not occur.; sent7 & sent12 -> int3: that the grouping opener occurs but the aligning does not occur is not right.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: the aligning occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the domiciliariness does not occur.; sent10 -> int7: the insentientness does not occur.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the sinning and the ironing occurs.; int8 -> int9: the sinning happens.; __UNKNOWN__