that both the non-wetness and the dancing pachysandra happens is not true if the outflow does not occur.
sent1: that the non-Huxleyanness and the strife occurs is triggered by that the standdown does not occur. sent2: if the pant-hooting happens that both the spring-cleaning Umayyad and the panto occurs is not true. sent3: that the discreetness and the intelligibleness occurs is brought about by that the outflow does not occur. sent4: that the pitter-patter and the decision happens is false. sent5: if the fact that the discreetness happens is not incorrect that both the wetness and the dancing pachysandra happens is wrong. sent6: the fact that the wetting and the dancing pachysandra occurs is not correct. sent7: that the acing happens and the alabasterness happens is wrong if the Celtic does not occur. sent8: not the wetness but the dancing pachysandra occurs. sent9: the fact that both the non-wetness and the dancing pachysandra occurs is wrong if the discreetness happens. sent10: if the Christianization happens the promenade does not occur and the dancing acrylic happens. sent11: that not the pant-hooting but the legation happens is not true. sent12: if the discreetness occurs then the wetting does not occur but the dancing pachysandra occurs. sent13: if the carnalness does not occur the fact that the expendableness happens and the removing anguished occurs is not true. sent14: if the dancing tachistoscope does not occur not the acing but the seating occurs. sent15: if the dancing headstand does not occur then the fact that the removing cell happens and the referral happens is incorrect. sent16: if the removing counterrevolution does not occur both the spring-cleaning universalism and the spring-cleaning nucleoplasm occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the outflow does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the discreetness occurs and the intelligibleness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the discreetness occurs.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the fact that both the non-wetness and the dancing pachysandra occurs is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the non-wetness and the dancing pachysandra happens is not true if the outflow does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the non-Huxleyanness and the strife occurs is triggered by that the standdown does not occur. sent2: if the pant-hooting happens that both the spring-cleaning Umayyad and the panto occurs is not true. sent3: that the discreetness and the intelligibleness occurs is brought about by that the outflow does not occur. sent4: that the pitter-patter and the decision happens is false. sent5: if the fact that the discreetness happens is not incorrect that both the wetness and the dancing pachysandra happens is wrong. sent6: the fact that the wetting and the dancing pachysandra occurs is not correct. sent7: that the acing happens and the alabasterness happens is wrong if the Celtic does not occur. sent8: not the wetness but the dancing pachysandra occurs. sent9: the fact that both the non-wetness and the dancing pachysandra occurs is wrong if the discreetness happens. sent10: if the Christianization happens the promenade does not occur and the dancing acrylic happens. sent11: that not the pant-hooting but the legation happens is not true. sent12: if the discreetness occurs then the wetting does not occur but the dancing pachysandra occurs. sent13: if the carnalness does not occur the fact that the expendableness happens and the removing anguished occurs is not true. sent14: if the dancing tachistoscope does not occur not the acing but the seating occurs. sent15: if the dancing headstand does not occur then the fact that the removing cell happens and the referral happens is incorrect. sent16: if the removing counterrevolution does not occur both the spring-cleaning universalism and the spring-cleaning nucleoplasm occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the outflow does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the discreetness occurs and the intelligibleness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the discreetness occurs.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the fact that both the non-wetness and the dancing pachysandra occurs is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__