the subaltern is a subaltern but not useful.
sent1: the parang is rabbinical but it does not dissemble floret. sent2: the parang is organicistic. sent3: the parang does organize atrium and/or it is insignificant. sent4: if the parang is rabbinical thing that does not dissemble floret it tags. sent5: the fact that the parang is non-organicistic thing that is not insignificant is not correct if the lyssavirus does tag. sent6: that the subaltern is not a whirl hold if the parang is a whacker and/or redoubles. sent7: something does redouble if it whirls. sent8: if the rump does not trip parang it does not dissemble Dayan. sent9: if the subaltern is organicistic the fact that it is a kind of a subaltern and it is non-useful is false. sent10: if the moderationist redoubles the lyssavirus is a kind of a whacker. sent11: something is a kind of a subaltern but it is not useful if it is not a whirl. sent12: if something is a whacker then that it is a tag is right. sent13: if the parang is organicistic and does tag it is not insignificant. sent14: the parang is not non-rabbinical. sent15: something does whirl. sent16: if something is not insignificant it is a whacker.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the parang is a tag.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the parang is organicistic and it is a kind of a tag.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the parang is significant.; sent16 -> int4: the parang is a kind of a whacker if it is not insignificant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the parang is a whacker.; int5 -> int6: the parang either is a whacker or redoubles or both.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the subaltern is not a whirl.; sent11 -> int8: if the subaltern is not a kind of a whirl it is both a subaltern and not useful.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the plumb does redouble.
$hypothesis$ = the subaltern is a subaltern but not useful. ; $context$ = sent1: the parang is rabbinical but it does not dissemble floret. sent2: the parang is organicistic. sent3: the parang does organize atrium and/or it is insignificant. sent4: if the parang is rabbinical thing that does not dissemble floret it tags. sent5: the fact that the parang is non-organicistic thing that is not insignificant is not correct if the lyssavirus does tag. sent6: that the subaltern is not a whirl hold if the parang is a whacker and/or redoubles. sent7: something does redouble if it whirls. sent8: if the rump does not trip parang it does not dissemble Dayan. sent9: if the subaltern is organicistic the fact that it is a kind of a subaltern and it is non-useful is false. sent10: if the moderationist redoubles the lyssavirus is a kind of a whacker. sent11: something is a kind of a subaltern but it is not useful if it is not a whirl. sent12: if something is a whacker then that it is a tag is right. sent13: if the parang is organicistic and does tag it is not insignificant. sent14: the parang is not non-rabbinical. sent15: something does whirl. sent16: if something is not insignificant it is a whacker. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the parang is a tag.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the parang is organicistic and it is a kind of a tag.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the parang is significant.; sent16 -> int4: the parang is a kind of a whacker if it is not insignificant.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the parang is a whacker.; int5 -> int6: the parang either is a whacker or redoubles or both.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the subaltern is not a whirl.; sent11 -> int8: if the subaltern is not a kind of a whirl it is both a subaltern and not useful.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__