the fact that the chamomile trolls Taiwan and does not accelerate Shiraz does not hold if the ripcord is not a calculation.
sent1: if the chamomile does not troll Taiwan then that the transcriber is spermicidal and it accelerates Shiraz is not right. sent2: that the ripcord is spermicidal but it is not a calculation is wrong if the transcriber protuberates multiplicand. sent3: if the fact that the ripcord is not a calculation is not false the chamomile trolls Taiwan but it does not accelerate Shiraz. sent4: the chamomile trolls Taiwan and does not accelerate Shiraz. sent5: the chamomile does troll Taiwan and does not protuberate multiplicand. sent6: the fact that the chamomile does troll Taiwan but it does not accelerate Shiraz is false if the transcriber is spermicidal. sent7: that the chamomile trolls Taiwan and it does accelerate Shiraz is not correct if the ripcord is not a calculation. sent8: the ripcord is a kind of a calculation if that it is spermicidal thing that does not protuberate multiplicand is incorrect. sent9: if the transcriber is not non-spermicidal then the chamomile does troll Taiwan but it does not accelerate Shiraz. sent10: that the transcriber does wave apnea but it does not protuberate multiplicand is incorrect if the ripcord is not a calculation. sent11: if something protuberates multiplicand then that it is spermicidal is right. sent12: something is spermicidal if the fact that it waves apnea and it does not protuberate multiplicand is incorrect. sent13: the transcriber is spermicidal if it does protuberate multiplicand. sent14: the fact that the chamomile does troll Taiwan and it does accelerate Shiraz is not true if that the transcriber is spermicidal is not incorrect. sent15: the chamomile trolls Taiwan but it is not spermicidal if the transcriber does wave apnea.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ripcord is not a calculation.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the transcriber waves apnea but it does not protuberate multiplicand is incorrect.; sent12 -> int2: if the fact that the transcriber does wave apnea and does not protuberate multiplicand is false then it is spermicidal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the transcriber is spermicidal.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the chamomile does troll Taiwan but it does not accelerate Shiraz is not true.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chamomile trolls Taiwan and does not accelerate Shiraz does not hold if the ripcord is not a calculation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chamomile does not troll Taiwan then that the transcriber is spermicidal and it accelerates Shiraz is not right. sent2: that the ripcord is spermicidal but it is not a calculation is wrong if the transcriber protuberates multiplicand. sent3: if the fact that the ripcord is not a calculation is not false the chamomile trolls Taiwan but it does not accelerate Shiraz. sent4: the chamomile trolls Taiwan and does not accelerate Shiraz. sent5: the chamomile does troll Taiwan and does not protuberate multiplicand. sent6: the fact that the chamomile does troll Taiwan but it does not accelerate Shiraz is false if the transcriber is spermicidal. sent7: that the chamomile trolls Taiwan and it does accelerate Shiraz is not correct if the ripcord is not a calculation. sent8: the ripcord is a kind of a calculation if that it is spermicidal thing that does not protuberate multiplicand is incorrect. sent9: if the transcriber is not non-spermicidal then the chamomile does troll Taiwan but it does not accelerate Shiraz. sent10: that the transcriber does wave apnea but it does not protuberate multiplicand is incorrect if the ripcord is not a calculation. sent11: if something protuberates multiplicand then that it is spermicidal is right. sent12: something is spermicidal if the fact that it waves apnea and it does not protuberate multiplicand is incorrect. sent13: the transcriber is spermicidal if it does protuberate multiplicand. sent14: the fact that the chamomile does troll Taiwan and it does accelerate Shiraz is not true if that the transcriber is spermicidal is not incorrect. sent15: the chamomile trolls Taiwan but it is not spermicidal if the transcriber does wave apnea. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ripcord is not a calculation.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the transcriber waves apnea but it does not protuberate multiplicand is incorrect.; sent12 -> int2: if the fact that the transcriber does wave apnea and does not protuberate multiplicand is false then it is spermicidal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the transcriber is spermicidal.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the chamomile does troll Taiwan but it does not accelerate Shiraz is not true.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__