the sable does not communicate seniti.
sent1: if there is something such that that that it is not practical and does prank is true is incorrect then the agent does not communicate Sucre. sent2: if something is not blastoporal then it does not communicate boundary and is a carnivore. sent3: the agent does not splay alidade. sent4: if the agent is either impractical or antipyretic or both then the Wain is not arsenious. sent5: if that something does not communicate Sucre but it does prank is not right the fact that it is not practical is not false. sent6: that the agent is not trustful and splays alidade does not hold. sent7: the Wain is not antipyretic if something that does not splay alidade is arsenious. sent8: if something is not practical then it does not splay alidade and it is arsenious. sent9: the executor is arsenious thing that does splay alidade if there is something such that it is a antipyretic. sent10: if that the executor is arsenious is not incorrect then that the Wain is not practical and pranks is not correct. sent11: if either the Wain is not a kind of a antipyretic or it is not distrustful or both the fact that the sable does not communicate seniti is right. sent12: the alidade does not revamp if that it is not a antipyretic is correct. sent13: that the sable is not trustful is not wrong if something that is not a godmother communicates tachometer. sent14: if the pseudohermaphrodite is an affined but it is not trustful it is a kind of a antipyretic. sent15: that the Wain does not communicate seniti is not false if either the agent does not splay alidade or it is trustful or both. sent16: if something does not spray Atropidae then that it does not splay porte-cochere is not wrong. sent17: there exists something such that it is a pachisi. sent18: the sable does not communicate Sucre but it is arsenious if the fact that it does not communicate seniti is correct. sent19: either the Wain does not prank or it is not arsenious or both. sent20: if there is something such that it is a pachisi the fact that the fact that the agent does not communicate Sucre and pranks hold is false. sent21: something does not communicate Sucre if it is not a kind of a antipyretic. sent22: there exists something such that it does communicate seniti. sent23: the pseudohermaphrodite is an affined but not trustful. sent24: something is not a Leibniz.
sent17 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the agent does not communicate Sucre but it does prank is false.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the agent does not communicate Sucre and pranks is wrong then it is not practical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the agent is not practical.; sent8 -> int4: the agent does not splay alidade and is arsenious if it is not practical.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the agent does not splay alidade but it is arsenious.; int5 -> int6: something does not splay alidade and is arsenious.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the fact that the Wain is not a kind of a antipyretic is not incorrect.; int7 -> int8: the Wain is not a kind of a antipyretic and/or it is trustful.; int8 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the sable communicates seniti.
sent14 & sent23 -> int9: the pseudohermaphrodite is antipyretic.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a kind of a antipyretic.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the executor is a kind of arsenious thing that splays alidade.; int11 -> int12: the fact that the executor is arsenious is not incorrect.; sent10 & int12 -> int13: that the Wain is impractical thing that pranks is incorrect.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that that it is non-practical thing that pranks is right is false.; int14 & sent1 -> int15: the agent does not communicate Sucre.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it does not communicate Sucre is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the sable does not communicate seniti. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that that it is not practical and does prank is true is incorrect then the agent does not communicate Sucre. sent2: if something is not blastoporal then it does not communicate boundary and is a carnivore. sent3: the agent does not splay alidade. sent4: if the agent is either impractical or antipyretic or both then the Wain is not arsenious. sent5: if that something does not communicate Sucre but it does prank is not right the fact that it is not practical is not false. sent6: that the agent is not trustful and splays alidade does not hold. sent7: the Wain is not antipyretic if something that does not splay alidade is arsenious. sent8: if something is not practical then it does not splay alidade and it is arsenious. sent9: the executor is arsenious thing that does splay alidade if there is something such that it is a antipyretic. sent10: if that the executor is arsenious is not incorrect then that the Wain is not practical and pranks is not correct. sent11: if either the Wain is not a kind of a antipyretic or it is not distrustful or both the fact that the sable does not communicate seniti is right. sent12: the alidade does not revamp if that it is not a antipyretic is correct. sent13: that the sable is not trustful is not wrong if something that is not a godmother communicates tachometer. sent14: if the pseudohermaphrodite is an affined but it is not trustful it is a kind of a antipyretic. sent15: that the Wain does not communicate seniti is not false if either the agent does not splay alidade or it is trustful or both. sent16: if something does not spray Atropidae then that it does not splay porte-cochere is not wrong. sent17: there exists something such that it is a pachisi. sent18: the sable does not communicate Sucre but it is arsenious if the fact that it does not communicate seniti is correct. sent19: either the Wain does not prank or it is not arsenious or both. sent20: if there is something such that it is a pachisi the fact that the fact that the agent does not communicate Sucre and pranks hold is false. sent21: something does not communicate Sucre if it is not a kind of a antipyretic. sent22: there exists something such that it does communicate seniti. sent23: the pseudohermaphrodite is an affined but not trustful. sent24: something is not a Leibniz. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the agent does not communicate Sucre but it does prank is false.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the agent does not communicate Sucre and pranks is wrong then it is not practical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the agent is not practical.; sent8 -> int4: the agent does not splay alidade and is arsenious if it is not practical.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the agent does not splay alidade but it is arsenious.; int5 -> int6: something does not splay alidade and is arsenious.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the fact that the Wain is not a kind of a antipyretic is not incorrect.; int7 -> int8: the Wain is not a kind of a antipyretic and/or it is trustful.; int8 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__