the pavlova debriefs chinquapin.
sent1: the pavlova does not amplify Carcharodon if the flagfish does not amplify Carcharodon. sent2: the fact that that that the flagfish is not a Balaenidae and does brisk is not incorrect is false is right. sent3: something that is not a kind of a metallic is not a Sanskrit. sent4: the flagfish is a Cotinus if it is a Balaenidae. sent5: that the polygraph is a metallic is not wrong. sent6: something that is not a kind of a Sanskrit amplifies Carcharodon and is a Cotinus. sent7: the pavlova does not amplify Carcharodon. sent8: the flagfish is a Cotinus if that it is not a Balaenidae and does brisk is not right. sent9: the polygraph is a Sanskrit and metallic. sent10: the Georgian is a Balaenidae. sent11: the polygraph is not recoverable and it is not lexicostatistic. sent12: if the fact that the flagfish does not amplify Carcharodon is right then the pavlova does not debrief chinquapin and does not amplify Carcharodon. sent13: that the flagfish is a Balaenidae and does brisk does not hold. sent14: if the flagfish does not debrief chinquapin but it is a Sanskrit it is not a Cotinus. sent15: the flagfish is not a surfacing. sent16: if something does amplify Carcharodon it debriefs chinquapin. sent17: if the flagfish does amplify Carcharodon and is a kind of a Cotinus that the polygraph is not a Sanskrit is correct. sent18: that something is not non-acaudate but non-black-and-white does not hold if it does not surface.
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the flagfish is a Cotinus.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flagfish does amplify Carcharodon.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the flagfish does amplify Carcharodon and is a kind of a Cotinus.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the polygraph is not a Sanskrit.; sent9 -> int4: the polygraph is a Sanskrit.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the flagfish does not amplify Carcharodon.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the pavlova does not debrief chinquapin and does not amplify Carcharodon.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the pavlova debriefs chinquapin.
sent16 -> int8: if the pavlova does amplify Carcharodon then it does debrief chinquapin.; sent6 -> int9: the pavlova amplifies Carcharodon and is a Cotinus if it is not a kind of a Sanskrit.; sent3 -> int10: if that the pavlova is not metallic is not false then it is not a Sanskrit.; sent18 -> int11: if the flagfish does not surface that it is acaudate and it is not black-and-white does not hold.; int11 & sent15 -> int12: the fact that the flagfish is acaudate but it is not black-and-white is false.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is acaudate and it is not black-and-white is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the pavlova debriefs chinquapin. ; $context$ = sent1: the pavlova does not amplify Carcharodon if the flagfish does not amplify Carcharodon. sent2: the fact that that that the flagfish is not a Balaenidae and does brisk is not incorrect is false is right. sent3: something that is not a kind of a metallic is not a Sanskrit. sent4: the flagfish is a Cotinus if it is a Balaenidae. sent5: that the polygraph is a metallic is not wrong. sent6: something that is not a kind of a Sanskrit amplifies Carcharodon and is a Cotinus. sent7: the pavlova does not amplify Carcharodon. sent8: the flagfish is a Cotinus if that it is not a Balaenidae and does brisk is not right. sent9: the polygraph is a Sanskrit and metallic. sent10: the Georgian is a Balaenidae. sent11: the polygraph is not recoverable and it is not lexicostatistic. sent12: if the fact that the flagfish does not amplify Carcharodon is right then the pavlova does not debrief chinquapin and does not amplify Carcharodon. sent13: that the flagfish is a Balaenidae and does brisk does not hold. sent14: if the flagfish does not debrief chinquapin but it is a Sanskrit it is not a Cotinus. sent15: the flagfish is not a surfacing. sent16: if something does amplify Carcharodon it debriefs chinquapin. sent17: if the flagfish does amplify Carcharodon and is a kind of a Cotinus that the polygraph is not a Sanskrit is correct. sent18: that something is not non-acaudate but non-black-and-white does not hold if it does not surface. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent2 -> int1: the flagfish is a Cotinus.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flagfish does amplify Carcharodon.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the flagfish does amplify Carcharodon and is a kind of a Cotinus.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the polygraph is not a Sanskrit.; sent9 -> int4: the polygraph is a Sanskrit.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the flagfish does not amplify Carcharodon.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the pavlova does not debrief chinquapin and does not amplify Carcharodon.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__