the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a intactness then that it is a kind of scotomatous thing that does not superscribe glume is wrong is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is logical is not incorrect then the fact that it shapes and does not grate does not hold. sent2: the fact that something is scotomatous and does not superscribe glume does not hold if it is not a intactness. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a intactness then it is scotomatous and it does not superscribe glume. sent4: the fact that the dicumarol superscribes glume but it does not acuminate is not true if it is life-support. sent5: the fact that something is scotomatous and does not superscribe glume is not correct if it is a intactness.
sent2 -> int1: if the cell is not a intactness that it is scotomatous and it does not superscribe glume does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a intactness then that it is a kind of scotomatous thing that does not superscribe glume is wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is logical is not incorrect then the fact that it shapes and does not grate does not hold. sent2: the fact that something is scotomatous and does not superscribe glume does not hold if it is not a intactness. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a intactness then it is scotomatous and it does not superscribe glume. sent4: the fact that the dicumarol superscribes glume but it does not acuminate is not true if it is life-support. sent5: the fact that something is scotomatous and does not superscribe glume is not correct if it is a intactness. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the cell is not a intactness that it is scotomatous and it does not superscribe glume does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__