the fact that the grantor is a kind of a coastland but it does not resist grantor is false.
sent1: that the suture is a Dawson and is immunosuppressive is correct. sent2: something that is not a theosophist is a coastland and does not resist grantor. sent3: the suture is a kind of a Dawson. sent4: the bibliographer is pistillate and/or extravasates. sent5: the fact that the grantor is a coastland but it does not resist grantor is not true if the suture is not a Dawson. sent6: the grantor does not resist grantor. sent7: something is immunosuppressive. sent8: the suture extravasates if the bibliographer extravasates. sent9: if there is something such that it is immunosuppressive and it extravasates the grantor is not a kind of a theosophist. sent10: the suture extravasates if the bibliographer is pistillate.
sent1 -> int1: that the suture is immunosuppressive hold.; sent4 & sent10 & sent8 -> int2: the suture extravasates.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the suture is immunosuppressive and it does extravasate.; int3 -> int4: something is a kind of immunosuppressive thing that extravasates.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the grantor is not a kind of a theosophist.; sent2 -> int6: the grantor is a coastland and does not resist grantor if it is not a kind of a theosophist.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the grantor is a coastland but it does not resist grantor does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the grantor is a kind of a coastland but it does not resist grantor is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the suture is a Dawson and is immunosuppressive is correct. sent2: something that is not a theosophist is a coastland and does not resist grantor. sent3: the suture is a kind of a Dawson. sent4: the bibliographer is pistillate and/or extravasates. sent5: the fact that the grantor is a coastland but it does not resist grantor is not true if the suture is not a Dawson. sent6: the grantor does not resist grantor. sent7: something is immunosuppressive. sent8: the suture extravasates if the bibliographer extravasates. sent9: if there is something such that it is immunosuppressive and it extravasates the grantor is not a kind of a theosophist. sent10: the suture extravasates if the bibliographer is pistillate. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: that the suture is immunosuppressive hold.; sent4 & sent10 & sent8 -> int2: the suture extravasates.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the suture is immunosuppressive and it does extravasate.; int3 -> int4: something is a kind of immunosuppressive thing that extravasates.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the grantor is not a kind of a theosophist.; sent2 -> int6: the grantor is a coastland and does not resist grantor if it is not a kind of a theosophist.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__