the deconstructionistness does not occur.
sent1: that the aiming does not occur is prevented by the broiling Burger. sent2: the non-aeromechanicsness is prevented by that the outage and the non-analphabeticness happens. sent3: if the aiming and the turnaround occurs then the walk does not occur. sent4: the broiling Burger or the parceling or both occurs. sent5: that the deconstructionistness occurs is prevented by that the aeromechanicsness and the quarantining Lindsay occurs. sent6: that the parcel happens prevents that the aim does not occur. sent7: if the walk does not occur then the analphabeticness does not occur. sent8: the quarantining Lindsay happens. sent9: the analphabeticness does not occur. sent10: the outage happens and the analphabeticness does not occur if the walking does not occur. sent11: that the broiling whiffer does not occur and/or the amphoricness does not occur is incorrect.
sent4 & sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the aiming happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the deconstructionistness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the aiming does not occur is prevented by the broiling Burger. sent2: the non-aeromechanicsness is prevented by that the outage and the non-analphabeticness happens. sent3: if the aiming and the turnaround occurs then the walk does not occur. sent4: the broiling Burger or the parceling or both occurs. sent5: that the deconstructionistness occurs is prevented by that the aeromechanicsness and the quarantining Lindsay occurs. sent6: that the parcel happens prevents that the aim does not occur. sent7: if the walk does not occur then the analphabeticness does not occur. sent8: the quarantining Lindsay happens. sent9: the analphabeticness does not occur. sent10: the outage happens and the analphabeticness does not occur if the walking does not occur. sent11: that the broiling whiffer does not occur and/or the amphoricness does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 & sent6 -> int1: the aiming happens.; __UNKNOWN__