the fact that the abdominal is not a Lully and it does not rehabilitate is incorrect.
sent1: the marquess is Socratic. sent2: the abdominal is not a haranguer and is not a rosefish. sent3: if the chelonian is a Lully then it is a crapaud. sent4: the abdominal is a kind of a crapaud. sent5: that the abdominal does rehabilitate is true if the chelonian does rehabilitate. sent6: the abdominal is not Socratic. sent7: the fact that the abdominal is not a kind of a Lully and it does not rehabilitate is incorrect if the chelonian is not an excretion. sent8: that if something is a kind of a earflap it is a Huron is not wrong. sent9: the phytohormone is a crapaud. sent10: something is a kind of a earflap that is not a bayberry if it is a heliotherapy. sent11: the chelonian is downstream. sent12: the abdominal is not a Lully if the chelonian is both a crapaud and Socratic. sent13: the chelonian is a crapaud if it is an excretion. sent14: the carthorse is a heliotherapy. sent15: the fact that the abdominal does not rehabilitate is right. sent16: the marquess is not a Lully if the abdominal is Socratic and rehabilitates. sent17: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Huron then the rosilla does not dropkick phytohormone. sent18: the wolframite is a IVP but not Socratic if the rosilla does not dropkick phytohormone. sent19: if the marquess is not non-Socratic the chelonian is non-Socratic. sent20: the chelonian does not rehabilitate. sent21: the marquess is not a crapaud. sent22: the fact that the abdominal is not configurational is true. sent23: the chelonian is an excretion. sent24: the fact that the chelonian is Socratic is true if the abdominal is Socratic. sent25: the marquess is not a kind of a crapaud if something is a IVP but it is not Socratic.
sent13 & sent23 -> int1: the fact that the chelonian is a crapaud is not false.; sent19 & sent1 -> int2: the chelonian is Socratic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chelonian is a crapaud and it is Socratic.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the abdominal is not a kind of a Lully.; int4 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the abdominal is not a Lully and does not rehabilitate is wrong.
sent8 -> int5: if the carthorse is a earflap then it is a Huron.; sent10 -> int6: the carthorse is a earflap and is not a bayberry if the fact that it is a heliotherapy hold.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the carthorse is a earflap and is not a bayberry.; int7 -> int8: the carthorse is a earflap.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the carthorse is a Huron.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a Huron.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the rosilla does not dropkick phytohormone.; sent18 & int11 -> int12: the wolframite is a IVP but it is not Socratic.; int12 -> int13: something is a IVP that is not Socratic.; int13 & sent25 -> int14: the marquess is not a crapaud.; int14 -> int15: something is not a crapaud.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the abdominal is not a Lully and it does not rehabilitate is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the marquess is Socratic. sent2: the abdominal is not a haranguer and is not a rosefish. sent3: if the chelonian is a Lully then it is a crapaud. sent4: the abdominal is a kind of a crapaud. sent5: that the abdominal does rehabilitate is true if the chelonian does rehabilitate. sent6: the abdominal is not Socratic. sent7: the fact that the abdominal is not a kind of a Lully and it does not rehabilitate is incorrect if the chelonian is not an excretion. sent8: that if something is a kind of a earflap it is a Huron is not wrong. sent9: the phytohormone is a crapaud. sent10: something is a kind of a earflap that is not a bayberry if it is a heliotherapy. sent11: the chelonian is downstream. sent12: the abdominal is not a Lully if the chelonian is both a crapaud and Socratic. sent13: the chelonian is a crapaud if it is an excretion. sent14: the carthorse is a heliotherapy. sent15: the fact that the abdominal does not rehabilitate is right. sent16: the marquess is not a Lully if the abdominal is Socratic and rehabilitates. sent17: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Huron then the rosilla does not dropkick phytohormone. sent18: the wolframite is a IVP but not Socratic if the rosilla does not dropkick phytohormone. sent19: if the marquess is not non-Socratic the chelonian is non-Socratic. sent20: the chelonian does not rehabilitate. sent21: the marquess is not a crapaud. sent22: the fact that the abdominal is not configurational is true. sent23: the chelonian is an excretion. sent24: the fact that the chelonian is Socratic is true if the abdominal is Socratic. sent25: the marquess is not a kind of a crapaud if something is a IVP but it is not Socratic. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent23 -> int1: the fact that the chelonian is a crapaud is not false.; sent19 & sent1 -> int2: the chelonian is Socratic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chelonian is a crapaud and it is Socratic.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the abdominal is not a kind of a Lully.; int4 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__