that the turban flames Marcionism and/or it is additive is incorrect.
sent1: if the half-length does build triangulation and it is basilican then the tubercle is not an additive. sent2: the berserker is a Flaubert and it is an ephedrine. sent3: the ichthyosaurus builds motorization if it is basilican. sent4: that something is non-basilican thing that is prosthodontics does not hold if it is not additive. sent5: if the fact that the ichthyosaurus is a Identikit is not false it is not peaceful and it does not build motorization. sent6: something is a dado and it flames Marcionism. sent7: if something does not braid calorie then it is prosthodontics and is basilican. sent8: if something that is a dado does flame Marcionism the half-length is not additive. sent9: if something is a kind of a Chalcididae then the half-length does not braid calorie. sent10: the ichthyosaurus is a Identikit. sent11: the fact that that something flames Marcionism and/or is a kind of an additive hold is false if it does not build triangulation. sent12: there is something such that it is a Chalcididae. sent13: that the ichthyosaurus is a kind of unpeaceful thing that does not build motorization is not correct if the half-length does not build triangulation. sent14: that the turban does build triangulation is right. sent15: the turban is not prosthodontics. sent16: that the turban is a kind of an additive and it does dado hold if the tubercle is not a kind of an additive. sent17: that the eulogist is prosthodontics and it builds triangulation is not right if something is not prosthodontics. sent18: if that the turban is not basilican is right then the half-length is basilican and it is an additive. sent19: the ichthyosaurus does not build motorization. sent20: if the half-length is not prosthodontics then that the turban is not basilican but it is a kind of a dado does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the half-length does not build triangulation.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ichthyosaurus is unpeaceful and does not build motorization is incorrect.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: the ichthyosaurus is unpeaceful thing that does not build motorization.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the half-length does build triangulation.; sent7 -> int5: the half-length is both not non-prosthodontics and basilican if it does not braid calorie.; sent12 & sent9 -> int6: the half-length does not braid calorie.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the half-length is prosthodontics thing that is basilican.; int7 -> int8: the half-length is basilican.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the half-length does build triangulation and it is basilican.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the tubercle is not a kind of an additive.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the turban is an additive and it dadoes.; int11 -> int12: the turban is a kind of an additive.; int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the turban does flame Marcionism or it is additive or both is wrong.
sent11 -> int13: if the turban does not build triangulation then the fact that it either flames Marcionism or is an additive or both is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the turban flames Marcionism and/or it is additive is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the half-length does build triangulation and it is basilican then the tubercle is not an additive. sent2: the berserker is a Flaubert and it is an ephedrine. sent3: the ichthyosaurus builds motorization if it is basilican. sent4: that something is non-basilican thing that is prosthodontics does not hold if it is not additive. sent5: if the fact that the ichthyosaurus is a Identikit is not false it is not peaceful and it does not build motorization. sent6: something is a dado and it flames Marcionism. sent7: if something does not braid calorie then it is prosthodontics and is basilican. sent8: if something that is a dado does flame Marcionism the half-length is not additive. sent9: if something is a kind of a Chalcididae then the half-length does not braid calorie. sent10: the ichthyosaurus is a Identikit. sent11: the fact that that something flames Marcionism and/or is a kind of an additive hold is false if it does not build triangulation. sent12: there is something such that it is a Chalcididae. sent13: that the ichthyosaurus is a kind of unpeaceful thing that does not build motorization is not correct if the half-length does not build triangulation. sent14: that the turban does build triangulation is right. sent15: the turban is not prosthodontics. sent16: that the turban is a kind of an additive and it does dado hold if the tubercle is not a kind of an additive. sent17: that the eulogist is prosthodontics and it builds triangulation is not right if something is not prosthodontics. sent18: if that the turban is not basilican is right then the half-length is basilican and it is an additive. sent19: the ichthyosaurus does not build motorization. sent20: if the half-length is not prosthodontics then that the turban is not basilican but it is a kind of a dado does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the half-length does not build triangulation.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ichthyosaurus is unpeaceful and does not build motorization is incorrect.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: the ichthyosaurus is unpeaceful thing that does not build motorization.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the half-length does build triangulation.; sent7 -> int5: the half-length is both not non-prosthodontics and basilican if it does not braid calorie.; sent12 & sent9 -> int6: the half-length does not braid calorie.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the half-length is prosthodontics thing that is basilican.; int7 -> int8: the half-length is basilican.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the half-length does build triangulation and it is basilican.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the tubercle is not a kind of an additive.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the turban is an additive and it dadoes.; int11 -> int12: the turban is a kind of an additive.; int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__