the pinetum is not a processed.
sent1: everything is a stuffiness and it is not illicit. sent2: something does embrown economist if that it does not embrown economist and it is a delegating is incorrect. sent3: something that is a intercommunion and is not aphaeretic does mask crisscross. sent4: everything is inconsiderate. sent5: if the ignoramus is inconsiderate and does not alliterate it is a kind of a Commerce. sent6: if something is not unready it does not process. sent7: the creep is not a kind of a Rachel if the nabumetone is not a kind of a meatus and/or is a kind of a Rachel. sent8: the coat is boustrophedonic. sent9: everything is inconsiderate and does not luminesce. sent10: the pinetum is glossopharyngeal. sent11: a non-catadromous naturalness is thermodynamics. sent12: the coat is unseamanlike if something that does not embrown varix is not priestly. sent13: the pinetum is inconsiderate. sent14: the nabumetone is not a meatus and/or it is a Rachel. sent15: if something that is inconsiderate does not luminesce then it is a processed. sent16: the coat does jam natrolite if it is boustrophedonic. sent17: the shanny does not embrown varix and is not priestly if the creep is not a Rachel. sent18: the fact that something is a scauper but it does not jam nabumetone is false if it embrowns economist. sent19: everything is not non-heroics but non-postal. sent20: if there exists something such that it is unseamanlike and jams natrolite then the gregarine does not delegate. sent21: if that the antimacassar is a scauper that does not jam nabumetone does not hold then the pinetum is not unready.
sent15 -> int1: if the pinetum is inconsiderate and does not luminesce then it is a kind of a processed.; sent9 -> int2: the pinetum is inconsiderate thing that does not luminesce.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the pinetum is not a processed.
sent6 -> int3: that the pinetum is not a processed is not wrong if it is not unready.; sent18 -> int4: that the antimacassar is a kind of a scauper and does not jam nabumetone does not hold if it embrowns economist.; sent2 -> int5: if that the antimacassar does not embrown economist but it delegates is not true that it embrown economist is not incorrect.; sent7 & sent14 -> int6: the creep is not a Rachel.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: the shanny does not embrown varix and is not priestly.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it does not embrown varix and is not priestly.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: that the coat is unseamanlike hold.; sent16 & sent8 -> int10: the coat does jam natrolite.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the coat is unseamanlike and does jam natrolite.; int11 -> int12: something is unseamanlike and it does jam natrolite.; int12 & sent20 -> int13: the gregarine is not a delegating.; int13 -> int14: something is not a delegating.;
$hypothesis$ = the pinetum is not a processed. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is a stuffiness and it is not illicit. sent2: something does embrown economist if that it does not embrown economist and it is a delegating is incorrect. sent3: something that is a intercommunion and is not aphaeretic does mask crisscross. sent4: everything is inconsiderate. sent5: if the ignoramus is inconsiderate and does not alliterate it is a kind of a Commerce. sent6: if something is not unready it does not process. sent7: the creep is not a kind of a Rachel if the nabumetone is not a kind of a meatus and/or is a kind of a Rachel. sent8: the coat is boustrophedonic. sent9: everything is inconsiderate and does not luminesce. sent10: the pinetum is glossopharyngeal. sent11: a non-catadromous naturalness is thermodynamics. sent12: the coat is unseamanlike if something that does not embrown varix is not priestly. sent13: the pinetum is inconsiderate. sent14: the nabumetone is not a meatus and/or it is a Rachel. sent15: if something that is inconsiderate does not luminesce then it is a processed. sent16: the coat does jam natrolite if it is boustrophedonic. sent17: the shanny does not embrown varix and is not priestly if the creep is not a Rachel. sent18: the fact that something is a scauper but it does not jam nabumetone is false if it embrowns economist. sent19: everything is not non-heroics but non-postal. sent20: if there exists something such that it is unseamanlike and jams natrolite then the gregarine does not delegate. sent21: if that the antimacassar is a scauper that does not jam nabumetone does not hold then the pinetum is not unready. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if the pinetum is inconsiderate and does not luminesce then it is a kind of a processed.; sent9 -> int2: the pinetum is inconsiderate thing that does not luminesce.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__