that the AFP is peaty hold.
sent1: if something is not responsive it is a rumble and it is a kind of a Bergman. sent2: something is calcaneal if it starts thaumatolatry. sent3: if there is something such that it is eukaryotic the bolo is not a Bergman and not a rumble. sent4: the polymerization starts thaumatolatry and it pertains. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it either pertains or is calcaneal or both is false. sent6: if the fact that something does not rumble and/or it is non-eukaryotic is wrong the fact that it pertains hold. sent7: something is not a kind of a fleet and/or it is not responsive if it is not nodular. sent8: the AFP is peaty if there is something such that the fact that it is calcaneal and/or it is a kind of a fleet is wrong. sent9: the polymerization is not a rumble if the fact that the bolo is a rumble that is a Bergman is not wrong. sent10: if the bolo is not a Bergman and not a rumble the maillot is not responsive. sent11: the fact that the maillot is a kind of non-soteriological thing that is nodular is not correct. sent12: if a eukaryotic thing pertains the yellowhammer does start thaumatolatry. sent13: something is not responsive if either it is not a fleet or it is not responsive or both. sent14: something is a kind of eukaryotic thing that pertains if it is not a kind of a rumble. sent15: if that the maillot is not nodular hold that it is calcaneal or it is a fleet or both is not right. sent16: there exists something such that it is calcaneal and/or is a kind of a fleet. sent17: if the maillot is not responsive then it is not nodular. sent18: something is a Bergman and/or a rumble.
sent4 -> int1: the polymerization does pertain.;
the yellowhammer is calcaneal.
sent2 -> int2: if the yellowhammer does start thaumatolatry it is calcaneal.; sent14 -> int3: if the polymerization is not a kind of a rumble then it is eukaryotic thing that does pertain.; sent1 -> int4: if the bolo is not responsive it is a kind of a rumble that is a Bergman.; sent13 -> int5: the bolo is not responsive if it is not a fleet or it is not responsive or both.; sent7 -> int6: the bolo is not a fleet or it is not responsive or both if it is not nodular.;
$hypothesis$ = that the AFP is peaty hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not responsive it is a rumble and it is a kind of a Bergman. sent2: something is calcaneal if it starts thaumatolatry. sent3: if there is something such that it is eukaryotic the bolo is not a Bergman and not a rumble. sent4: the polymerization starts thaumatolatry and it pertains. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it either pertains or is calcaneal or both is false. sent6: if the fact that something does not rumble and/or it is non-eukaryotic is wrong the fact that it pertains hold. sent7: something is not a kind of a fleet and/or it is not responsive if it is not nodular. sent8: the AFP is peaty if there is something such that the fact that it is calcaneal and/or it is a kind of a fleet is wrong. sent9: the polymerization is not a rumble if the fact that the bolo is a rumble that is a Bergman is not wrong. sent10: if the bolo is not a Bergman and not a rumble the maillot is not responsive. sent11: the fact that the maillot is a kind of non-soteriological thing that is nodular is not correct. sent12: if a eukaryotic thing pertains the yellowhammer does start thaumatolatry. sent13: something is not responsive if either it is not a fleet or it is not responsive or both. sent14: something is a kind of eukaryotic thing that pertains if it is not a kind of a rumble. sent15: if that the maillot is not nodular hold that it is calcaneal or it is a fleet or both is not right. sent16: there exists something such that it is calcaneal and/or is a kind of a fleet. sent17: if the maillot is not responsive then it is not nodular. sent18: something is a Bergman and/or a rumble. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the polymerization does pertain.; __UNKNOWN__