the fact that both the watering and the non-textualness happens does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the waters happens if the citation does not occur is true. sent2: the aroidness does not occur if the citation happens. sent3: that the bloomers happens and the endocrineness occurs is brought about by that the sensorimotorness does not occur. sent4: if the debasing and the bolting occurs then the sensorimotorness does not occur. sent5: the skipping imaret happens if the pedalness does not occur. sent6: if the orchidectomy does not occur then both the debasing and the ESR happens. sent7: the photoemissiveness occurs but the sensorineuralness does not occur. sent8: that the textualness does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: the acquiescence does not occur if that the waters occurs but the citation does not occur does not hold. sent10: the faecalness does not occur and the slap does not occur. sent11: the fact that the textualness happens or the departmentalness does not occur or both does not hold if the congregation happens. sent12: the colonialness does not occur. sent13: that the aroidness but not the ring-around-the-rosy happens does not hold. sent14: the aroidness does not occur. sent15: the congregation happens if that the bloomers happens is right. sent16: if that the textualness or the non-departmentalness or both occurs is not right then the watering does not occur. sent17: that the aroidness does not occur and the ring-around-the-rosy does not occur is not correct. sent18: if the citation occurs then the aroidness does not occur and the ring-around-the-rosy does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the citation occurs.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the aroidness does not occur and the ring-around-the-rosy does not occur.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the citation does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the waters occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the watering but not the textualness occurs is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the watering and the non-textualness happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the waters happens if the citation does not occur is true. sent2: the aroidness does not occur if the citation happens. sent3: that the bloomers happens and the endocrineness occurs is brought about by that the sensorimotorness does not occur. sent4: if the debasing and the bolting occurs then the sensorimotorness does not occur. sent5: the skipping imaret happens if the pedalness does not occur. sent6: if the orchidectomy does not occur then both the debasing and the ESR happens. sent7: the photoemissiveness occurs but the sensorineuralness does not occur. sent8: that the textualness does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: the acquiescence does not occur if that the waters occurs but the citation does not occur does not hold. sent10: the faecalness does not occur and the slap does not occur. sent11: the fact that the textualness happens or the departmentalness does not occur or both does not hold if the congregation happens. sent12: the colonialness does not occur. sent13: that the aroidness but not the ring-around-the-rosy happens does not hold. sent14: the aroidness does not occur. sent15: the congregation happens if that the bloomers happens is right. sent16: if that the textualness or the non-departmentalness or both occurs is not right then the watering does not occur. sent17: that the aroidness does not occur and the ring-around-the-rosy does not occur is not correct. sent18: if the citation occurs then the aroidness does not occur and the ring-around-the-rosy does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the citation occurs.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the aroidness does not occur and the ring-around-the-rosy does not occur.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the citation does not occur.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the waters occurs.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__