the fact that the opal does not necrose is right.
sent1: the opal does feel. sent2: the cup does not cox scamper and does put Dhaka if it is not cross-linguistic. sent3: something is a royalism if it is a Nubia. sent4: that the cup coxes scamper and/or does not put Dhaka is not incorrect if there is something such that that it is non-Arawakan is not incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that that it is nonreversible and not joyless is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a binomial. sent7: the fact that something necroses is not wrong if it is cross-linguistic. sent8: the cup dubs. sent9: if the cup is a kind of joyless thing that does tweet Pylodictus then it is not cross-linguistic. sent10: that the bridgehead is caesural hold. sent11: if the fact that something necroses but it is not Arawakan is false then that it does not necroses is not incorrect. sent12: there is something such that it is Arawakan. sent13: the opal does cox scamper. sent14: there are non-Arawakan things. sent15: if the cup coxes scamper then the opal is cross-linguistic. sent16: something is not appointive. sent17: a triskaidekaphobia truckles. sent18: if the cup coxes scamper and/or it does not put Dhaka the opal is cross-linguistic.
sent14 & sent4 -> int1: the cup either does cox scamper or does not put Dhaka or both.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the opal is cross-linguistic.; sent7 -> int3: if the opal is cross-linguistic it does necrose.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the opal does not necrose.
sent11 -> int4: the opal does not necrose if the fact that it does necrose and is not Arawakan is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the opal does not necrose is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the opal does feel. sent2: the cup does not cox scamper and does put Dhaka if it is not cross-linguistic. sent3: something is a royalism if it is a Nubia. sent4: that the cup coxes scamper and/or does not put Dhaka is not incorrect if there is something such that that it is non-Arawakan is not incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that that it is nonreversible and not joyless is incorrect. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a binomial. sent7: the fact that something necroses is not wrong if it is cross-linguistic. sent8: the cup dubs. sent9: if the cup is a kind of joyless thing that does tweet Pylodictus then it is not cross-linguistic. sent10: that the bridgehead is caesural hold. sent11: if the fact that something necroses but it is not Arawakan is false then that it does not necroses is not incorrect. sent12: there is something such that it is Arawakan. sent13: the opal does cox scamper. sent14: there are non-Arawakan things. sent15: if the cup coxes scamper then the opal is cross-linguistic. sent16: something is not appointive. sent17: a triskaidekaphobia truckles. sent18: if the cup coxes scamper and/or it does not put Dhaka the opal is cross-linguistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent4 -> int1: the cup either does cox scamper or does not put Dhaka or both.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the opal is cross-linguistic.; sent7 -> int3: if the opal is cross-linguistic it does necrose.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__