the fact that the Tupelo is autotrophic but it is not ungrateful is wrong.
sent1: the warfarin is non-autoplastic if there exists something such that it does crossbreed trend-setter and is inflectional. sent2: if something is non-inflectional then the fact that it is autotrophic and not ungrateful is not true. sent3: the element is not a calorimetry or is autoplastic or both. sent4: something does not crossbreed trend-setter. sent5: the radiologist is a kind of a Cockney that is not Slovakian. sent6: the element is inflectional. sent7: if something is not a kind of a Cockney the fact that it is not non-articulatory and it is not a nominal does not hold. sent8: the fact that if something is not a kind of a calorimetry and/or it is not non-autoplastic the warfarin is non-autoplastic is not incorrect. sent9: the element is inflectional and it is a calorimetry. sent10: if the radiologist is a kind of a Cockney but it is not Slovakian the Tupelo crossbreeds trend-setter. sent11: that that the radiologist is both autoplastic and not Slovakian is not wrong is wrong.
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the Tupelo does crossbreed trend-setter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tupelo is not non-inflectional.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Tupelo does crossbreed trend-setter and is not non-inflectional.; int2 -> int3: that something crossbreeds trend-setter and it is inflectional hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the warfarin is not autoplastic.; sent3 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a calorimetry or it is autoplastic or both.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the warfarin is autoplastic hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Tupelo is not inflectional.; sent2 -> int9: if the Tupelo is not inflectional then that it is a kind of autotrophic thing that is not ungrateful is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
if the pleurothallis is not a kind of a Cockney the fact that it is both not non-articulatory and non-nominal does not hold.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Tupelo is autotrophic but it is not ungrateful is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the warfarin is non-autoplastic if there exists something such that it does crossbreed trend-setter and is inflectional. sent2: if something is non-inflectional then the fact that it is autotrophic and not ungrateful is not true. sent3: the element is not a calorimetry or is autoplastic or both. sent4: something does not crossbreed trend-setter. sent5: the radiologist is a kind of a Cockney that is not Slovakian. sent6: the element is inflectional. sent7: if something is not a kind of a Cockney the fact that it is not non-articulatory and it is not a nominal does not hold. sent8: the fact that if something is not a kind of a calorimetry and/or it is not non-autoplastic the warfarin is non-autoplastic is not incorrect. sent9: the element is inflectional and it is a calorimetry. sent10: if the radiologist is a kind of a Cockney but it is not Slovakian the Tupelo crossbreeds trend-setter. sent11: that that the radiologist is both autoplastic and not Slovakian is not wrong is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the Tupelo does crossbreed trend-setter.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tupelo is not non-inflectional.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Tupelo does crossbreed trend-setter and is not non-inflectional.; int2 -> int3: that something crossbreeds trend-setter and it is inflectional hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the warfarin is not autoplastic.; sent3 -> int5: there is something such that it is not a kind of a calorimetry or it is autoplastic or both.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the warfarin is autoplastic hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the Tupelo is not inflectional.; sent2 -> int9: if the Tupelo is not inflectional then that it is a kind of autotrophic thing that is not ungrateful is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__