the dictionary is not anisogametic and not a bumper.
sent1: the fact that that the scholar does not ingrain and is not basidiomycetous is not correct is right if something denaturalizes scholar. sent2: the carrel is basidiomycetous if that either it is anisogametic or it is not a stick or both is wrong. sent3: that the scholar does not denaturalize scholar and it is not anisogametic is not true. sent4: if there is something such that it is anisogametic that the carrel is basidiomycetous thing that is not a stick does not hold. sent5: the fact that the dictionary is not anisogametic but it ingrains is wrong. sent6: the carrel does ingrain. sent7: that the carrel does not ingrain and is apostrophic is not true. sent8: if the scholar denaturalizes scholar then the carrel is basidiomycetous. sent9: if something is basidiomycetous that the fact that the dictionary is a kind of non-anisogametic thing that is not a kind of a bumper does not hold hold. sent10: if the fact that the scholar does not ingrain and/or is not a stick is not right then it denaturalizes scholar. sent11: that the carrel hurtles abscissa hold. sent12: the fact that the scholar does not ingrain and is not a bumper is not true if that something is anisogametic hold. sent13: the carrel is a bumper. sent14: the scholar is a wyvern. sent15: the scholar parodies scalp. sent16: that the dictionary does denaturalize scholar and is not anisogametic is incorrect. sent17: the fact that the scholar does not ingrain and/or is not a stick does not hold. sent18: that the carrel is not a bumper but it is basidiomycetous is wrong. sent19: that the dictionary does not denaturalize snowflake and is regimental is wrong. sent20: the fact that the carrel is not vicennial and/or it does not denaturalize Carangidae is false. sent21: if there exists something such that it denaturalizes scholar then that the dictionary is not a stick and it is not a bumper is incorrect. sent22: that the scholar is not a kind of a stick and does not denaturalize scholar is not right if there exists something such that it is anisogametic.
sent10 & sent17 -> int1: the scholar does denaturalize scholar.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the carrel is basidiomycetous.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is basidiomycetous.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the dictionary is not anisogametic and not a bumper. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the scholar does not ingrain and is not basidiomycetous is not correct is right if something denaturalizes scholar. sent2: the carrel is basidiomycetous if that either it is anisogametic or it is not a stick or both is wrong. sent3: that the scholar does not denaturalize scholar and it is not anisogametic is not true. sent4: if there is something such that it is anisogametic that the carrel is basidiomycetous thing that is not a stick does not hold. sent5: the fact that the dictionary is not anisogametic but it ingrains is wrong. sent6: the carrel does ingrain. sent7: that the carrel does not ingrain and is apostrophic is not true. sent8: if the scholar denaturalizes scholar then the carrel is basidiomycetous. sent9: if something is basidiomycetous that the fact that the dictionary is a kind of non-anisogametic thing that is not a kind of a bumper does not hold hold. sent10: if the fact that the scholar does not ingrain and/or is not a stick is not right then it denaturalizes scholar. sent11: that the carrel hurtles abscissa hold. sent12: the fact that the scholar does not ingrain and is not a bumper is not true if that something is anisogametic hold. sent13: the carrel is a bumper. sent14: the scholar is a wyvern. sent15: the scholar parodies scalp. sent16: that the dictionary does denaturalize scholar and is not anisogametic is incorrect. sent17: the fact that the scholar does not ingrain and/or is not a stick does not hold. sent18: that the carrel is not a bumper but it is basidiomycetous is wrong. sent19: that the dictionary does not denaturalize snowflake and is regimental is wrong. sent20: the fact that the carrel is not vicennial and/or it does not denaturalize Carangidae is false. sent21: if there exists something such that it denaturalizes scholar then that the dictionary is not a stick and it is not a bumper is incorrect. sent22: that the scholar is not a kind of a stick and does not denaturalize scholar is not right if there exists something such that it is anisogametic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent17 -> int1: the scholar does denaturalize scholar.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the carrel is basidiomycetous.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is basidiomycetous.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__