the fact that if the quadrupedalness happens the cautiousness does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the niceness does not occur and the cannonade happens if the quadrupedalness occurs. sent2: the incontestableness and the perfusion occurs. sent3: the non-littleness and the assist happens. sent4: the non-costalness is prevented by that not the indefeasibleness but the ugliness occurs. sent5: that not the quarter but the lasting happens is caused by that the economicalness occurs. sent6: that the persistentness occurs is not incorrect. sent7: the littleness occurs if the Carmelite happens. sent8: that the gesture happens prevents that the deducing blink occurs. sent9: that the niceness does not occur but the cannonade occurs results in that the cautiousness does not occur. sent10: the deducing jocundity happens. sent11: if the effacement happens not the payment but the mistreatment occurs. sent12: the fact that the checkmating boy does not occur is true. sent13: if the deducing determinateness occurs then the cluttering does not occur. sent14: if the checkmating wurtzite occurs the quarter does not occur. sent15: the non-pyogenicness is brought about by the restfulness. sent16: not the ugliness but the immortalizing worker occurs. sent17: the immortalizing tapa does not occur. sent18: the scripturalness does not occur. sent19: if the parliamentariness does not occur but the Circumcision happens the interreflection does not occur. sent20: that the checkmating acanthus occurs is prevented by that the payment does not occur and the ruin occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quadrupedalness occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: not the niceness but the cannonade happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the cautiousness does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the quadrupedalness happens the cautiousness does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the niceness does not occur and the cannonade happens if the quadrupedalness occurs. sent2: the incontestableness and the perfusion occurs. sent3: the non-littleness and the assist happens. sent4: the non-costalness is prevented by that not the indefeasibleness but the ugliness occurs. sent5: that not the quarter but the lasting happens is caused by that the economicalness occurs. sent6: that the persistentness occurs is not incorrect. sent7: the littleness occurs if the Carmelite happens. sent8: that the gesture happens prevents that the deducing blink occurs. sent9: that the niceness does not occur but the cannonade occurs results in that the cautiousness does not occur. sent10: the deducing jocundity happens. sent11: if the effacement happens not the payment but the mistreatment occurs. sent12: the fact that the checkmating boy does not occur is true. sent13: if the deducing determinateness occurs then the cluttering does not occur. sent14: if the checkmating wurtzite occurs the quarter does not occur. sent15: the non-pyogenicness is brought about by the restfulness. sent16: not the ugliness but the immortalizing worker occurs. sent17: the immortalizing tapa does not occur. sent18: the scripturalness does not occur. sent19: if the parliamentariness does not occur but the Circumcision happens the interreflection does not occur. sent20: that the checkmating acanthus occurs is prevented by that the payment does not occur and the ruin occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quadrupedalness occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: not the niceness but the cannonade happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the cautiousness does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__