the Wisconsinite is a fandom and it puffs.
sent1: the condominium does not freckle aphorism. sent2: the coalfield freckles solfege but it is not a kind of a Aegypius. sent3: something that is not a gone and is a Machiavellianism does roll Limulus. sent4: something is a puffing if it does not parley and it is a Machiavellianism. sent5: the Wisconsinite is not a parley but a Machiavellianism if the condominium does not freckle aphorism. sent6: The aphorism does not freckle condominium.
sent2 -> int1: there is something such that it freckles solfege and it is not a Aegypius.; sent4 -> int2: if the Wisconsinite is not a parley but it is a Machiavellianism it is a puffing.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the Wisconsinite is not a parley and is a Machiavellianism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Wisconsinite does puff is right.;
if the tremble is both not a gone and a Machiavellianism then it does roll Limulus.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Wisconsinite is a fandom and it puffs. ; $context$ = sent1: the condominium does not freckle aphorism. sent2: the coalfield freckles solfege but it is not a kind of a Aegypius. sent3: something that is not a gone and is a Machiavellianism does roll Limulus. sent4: something is a puffing if it does not parley and it is a Machiavellianism. sent5: the Wisconsinite is not a parley but a Machiavellianism if the condominium does not freckle aphorism. sent6: The aphorism does not freckle condominium. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: there is something such that it freckles solfege and it is not a Aegypius.; sent4 -> int2: if the Wisconsinite is not a parley but it is a Machiavellianism it is a puffing.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the Wisconsinite is not a parley and is a Machiavellianism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Wisconsinite does puff is right.; __UNKNOWN__