the fact that the flange is zygotic and it is peaty is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that either it is actable or it is a semen or both. sent2: the seismologist does droop if there exists something such that it is a semen. sent3: if the reveler is not a Latrodectus that the flange is zygotic and it is peaty is incorrect. sent4: the seismologist does not droop. sent5: if something is not actable and/or it is a kind of a semen then the seismologist does droop. sent6: the reveler either is not actable or is a semen or both if the flange is not a Latrodectus. sent7: the seismologist is a confessor that is editorial. sent8: that the flange is insufficient is not incorrect if it is a Latrodectus. sent9: the fact that the flange is zygotic is not false. sent10: if the flange is insufficient it is peaty. sent11: if the fact that something is insufficient or does not droop or both is false then it is not a Latrodectus. sent12: if the reveler is a Latrodectus then it is actable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flange is not a kind of a Latrodectus.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reveler is not actable and/or it is a semen.; int1 -> int2: something is not actable and/or it is a kind of a semen.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the seismologist does droop.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the flange is a Latrodectus.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the flange is insufficient.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the flange is peaty.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the flange is zygotic and peaty is false.
sent11 -> int8: the reveler is not a Latrodectus if that it is insufficient and/or it does not droop is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the flange is zygotic and it is peaty is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that either it is actable or it is a semen or both. sent2: the seismologist does droop if there exists something such that it is a semen. sent3: if the reveler is not a Latrodectus that the flange is zygotic and it is peaty is incorrect. sent4: the seismologist does not droop. sent5: if something is not actable and/or it is a kind of a semen then the seismologist does droop. sent6: the reveler either is not actable or is a semen or both if the flange is not a Latrodectus. sent7: the seismologist is a confessor that is editorial. sent8: that the flange is insufficient is not incorrect if it is a Latrodectus. sent9: the fact that the flange is zygotic is not false. sent10: if the flange is insufficient it is peaty. sent11: if the fact that something is insufficient or does not droop or both is false then it is not a Latrodectus. sent12: if the reveler is a Latrodectus then it is actable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flange is not a kind of a Latrodectus.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reveler is not actable and/or it is a semen.; int1 -> int2: something is not actable and/or it is a kind of a semen.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the seismologist does droop.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the flange is a Latrodectus.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the flange is insufficient.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the flange is peaty.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__