there is something such that if the fact that it is non-onomastics and it is not playable is not correct then it is not a contemporary.
sent1: if the Alabaman muffs promenade then it is not onomastics. sent2: if the fact that the tetrapod is onomastics but it is not playable is incorrect then it is not a kind of a contemporary. sent3: there is something such that if it does not sound pretentiousness and it is not nonpasserine then that it is not a kind of a lithography is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not onomastics and is playable does not hold it is not a contemporary. sent5: if something does not muff manana and it is not a minute then it is not repulsive. sent6: something is not a contemporary if it is not onomastics and is not playable. sent7: there exists something such that if it does lace then it is not a hawkishness. sent8: if the tetrapod is playable then it is not a contemporary. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of onomastics thing that is not playable does not hold it is not a contemporary. sent10: if the fact that something is not playable and it is not undemocratic is not right then it is not a kind of an encyclical. sent11: there exists something such that if it is extroversive then it is not a Negaprion. sent12: if the tetrapod does not muff sapper and it is not an infanticide it is not a bunch.
if the fact that the tail is not playable and it is not undemocratic does not hold it is not an encyclical.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is non-onomastics and it is not playable is not correct then it is not a contemporary. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Alabaman muffs promenade then it is not onomastics. sent2: if the fact that the tetrapod is onomastics but it is not playable is incorrect then it is not a kind of a contemporary. sent3: there is something such that if it does not sound pretentiousness and it is not nonpasserine then that it is not a kind of a lithography is not wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not onomastics and is playable does not hold it is not a contemporary. sent5: if something does not muff manana and it is not a minute then it is not repulsive. sent6: something is not a contemporary if it is not onomastics and is not playable. sent7: there exists something such that if it does lace then it is not a hawkishness. sent8: if the tetrapod is playable then it is not a contemporary. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of onomastics thing that is not playable does not hold it is not a contemporary. sent10: if the fact that something is not playable and it is not undemocratic is not right then it is not a kind of an encyclical. sent11: there exists something such that if it is extroversive then it is not a Negaprion. sent12: if the tetrapod does not muff sapper and it is not an infanticide it is not a bunch. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__