if the channel is a kind of a opopanax then the tofu is nonimitative.
sent1: the channel is not sepaloid if that it is not a kind of a take and it is a hydromancy is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that it is not sepaloid and it is a opopanax the tofu is nonimitative. sent3: that the channel does not take but it is a hydromancy is wrong.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the channel is not sepaloid.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the channel is a kind of a opopanax hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the channel is non-sepaloid but it is a opopanax.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not sepaloid and it is a opopanax.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the tofu is nonimitative.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the channel is a kind of a opopanax then the tofu is nonimitative. ; $context$ = sent1: the channel is not sepaloid if that it is not a kind of a take and it is a hydromancy is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that it is not sepaloid and it is a opopanax the tofu is nonimitative. sent3: that the channel does not take but it is a hydromancy is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the channel is not sepaloid.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the channel is a kind of a opopanax hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the channel is non-sepaloid but it is a opopanax.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not sepaloid and it is a opopanax.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the tofu is nonimitative.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__