the fact that the perennation is not non-Lebanese is true.
sent1: the fact that that something is not axillary and it does not prime radian is not true if it is not a redwood is right. sent2: if something is a shave that it does not air and is not anastigmatic is not true. sent3: if something is a shave that it is not a redwood and does not prime helm does not hold. sent4: something is not a bulimic and/or it is not a kind of a labial. sent5: the fact that the inclinometer is not anastigmatic and is not an air is wrong. sent6: if the inclinometer is a kind of a redwood that the perennation is not a Lebanese is correct. sent7: that the inclinometer shaves is true if it airs. sent8: the fact that the inclinometer is not anastigmatic but an air is not correct. sent9: the auk is not a labial if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a bulimic and/or it is not labial. sent10: if something is not a kind of a labial the fact that it does not prime helm and it shaves is wrong. sent11: if that something is not Lebanese and is not a redwood is incorrect then it is a Lebanese. sent12: if the fact that the inclinometer is a kind of non-anastigmatic thing that does not air is false then it is a shave. sent13: that the inclinometer is a redwood that does not prime helm does not hold. sent14: if something does not prime helm or it does shave or both then it is not a redwood. sent15: that the inclinometer is a redwood but it does not prime helm is not right if it is a shave. sent16: that the fact that something is a redwood and does not prime helm hold is incorrect if it is a shave. sent17: the perennation is non-Lebanese if the fact that the inclinometer is not a redwood and does not prime helm is not correct.
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the inclinometer does shave.; sent3 -> int2: if the inclinometer does shave then the fact that it is not a redwood and it does not prime helm does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the inclinometer is not a kind of a redwood and it does not prime helm is not wrong is incorrect.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
that the gauze is not axillary and it does not prime radian is not true.
sent1 -> int4: that the gauze is a kind of non-axillary thing that does not prime radian is incorrect if it is not a redwood.; sent14 -> int5: the gauze is not a redwood if it does not prime helm or it is a kind of a shave or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the perennation is not non-Lebanese is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that something is not axillary and it does not prime radian is not true if it is not a redwood is right. sent2: if something is a shave that it does not air and is not anastigmatic is not true. sent3: if something is a shave that it is not a redwood and does not prime helm does not hold. sent4: something is not a bulimic and/or it is not a kind of a labial. sent5: the fact that the inclinometer is not anastigmatic and is not an air is wrong. sent6: if the inclinometer is a kind of a redwood that the perennation is not a Lebanese is correct. sent7: that the inclinometer shaves is true if it airs. sent8: the fact that the inclinometer is not anastigmatic but an air is not correct. sent9: the auk is not a labial if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a bulimic and/or it is not labial. sent10: if something is not a kind of a labial the fact that it does not prime helm and it shaves is wrong. sent11: if that something is not Lebanese and is not a redwood is incorrect then it is a Lebanese. sent12: if the fact that the inclinometer is a kind of non-anastigmatic thing that does not air is false then it is a shave. sent13: that the inclinometer is a redwood that does not prime helm does not hold. sent14: if something does not prime helm or it does shave or both then it is not a redwood. sent15: that the inclinometer is a redwood but it does not prime helm is not right if it is a shave. sent16: that the fact that something is a redwood and does not prime helm hold is incorrect if it is a shave. sent17: the perennation is non-Lebanese if the fact that the inclinometer is not a redwood and does not prime helm is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the inclinometer does shave.; sent3 -> int2: if the inclinometer does shave then the fact that it is not a redwood and it does not prime helm does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the inclinometer is not a kind of a redwood and it does not prime helm is not wrong is incorrect.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__