the fact that if the scorer does radicalize the heliometer is idiographic does not hold.
sent1: the heliometer is idiographic if the scorer does not govern rifle and does not whelp. sent2: if the scorer is both non-fishy and non-idiographic then the tablemate is a amphidiploidy. sent3: something does not govern rifle if it is not non-Spartan and/or it does not govern rifle. sent4: the cursor is not a Spartan. sent5: that either the scorer is a Spartan or it does govern rifle or both hold if the tablemate is not a amphidiploidy. sent6: if something radicalizes and it is fishy then it does not whelp. sent7: if the scorer does not govern rifle and it is not idiographic the heliometer does whelp. sent8: the tablemate is a amphidiploidy and/or it is not idiographic. sent9: the heliometer radicalizes and/or it is non-Spartan if the scorer is not fishy. sent10: if something that is not idiographic does not whelp then it is not fishy. sent11: the scorer is a kind of a Spartan and/or it does govern rifle. sent12: the scorer is Spartan and/or does not govern rifle if the tablemate is not a kind of a amphidiploidy. sent13: if the heliometer is not fishy and it is not idiographic then the scorer is a kind of a amphidiploidy. sent14: if the heliometer does not whelp and it does not govern rifle then that the scorer is idiographic is not incorrect. sent15: if the scorer is not Spartan and is not a kind of a amphidiploidy then the tablemate is fishy. sent16: the tablemate does not radicalize. sent17: the scorer is a amphidiploidy if the tablemate does not govern rifle and is non-fishy. sent18: if the tablemate is a amphidiploidy either the heliometer is not a Spartan or it is idiographic or both. sent19: the tablemate is not a amphidiploidy. sent20: the scorer is a amphidiploidy if the tablemate is not fishy and it does not whelp. sent21: the scorer is a amphidiploidy. sent22: the tablemate either is a disheartenment or is a kind of a handling or both. sent23: the scorer is fishy. sent24: the heliometer does not govern rifle if it is not Spartan and/or it is idiographic. sent25: if the fact that the scorer is not fishy but it radicalizes is wrong then the sourpuss does not whelp.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scorer does radicalize.; assump1 & sent23 -> int1: the scorer does radicalize and it is fishy.; sent6 -> int2: if the scorer does radicalize and it is fishy that it does not whelp is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the scorer does not whelp.; sent3 -> int4: if the scorer is a kind of a Spartan and/or does not govern rifle then it does not govern rifle.; sent12 & sent19 -> int5: either the scorer is Spartan or it does not govern rifle or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the scorer does not govern rifle.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the scorer does not govern rifle and it does not whelp.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the heliometer is idiographic.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the piping governs rifle is right.
sent10 -> int9: if the scorer is non-idiographic thing that does not whelp it is not fishy.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the scorer does radicalize the heliometer is idiographic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the heliometer is idiographic if the scorer does not govern rifle and does not whelp. sent2: if the scorer is both non-fishy and non-idiographic then the tablemate is a amphidiploidy. sent3: something does not govern rifle if it is not non-Spartan and/or it does not govern rifle. sent4: the cursor is not a Spartan. sent5: that either the scorer is a Spartan or it does govern rifle or both hold if the tablemate is not a amphidiploidy. sent6: if something radicalizes and it is fishy then it does not whelp. sent7: if the scorer does not govern rifle and it is not idiographic the heliometer does whelp. sent8: the tablemate is a amphidiploidy and/or it is not idiographic. sent9: the heliometer radicalizes and/or it is non-Spartan if the scorer is not fishy. sent10: if something that is not idiographic does not whelp then it is not fishy. sent11: the scorer is a kind of a Spartan and/or it does govern rifle. sent12: the scorer is Spartan and/or does not govern rifle if the tablemate is not a kind of a amphidiploidy. sent13: if the heliometer is not fishy and it is not idiographic then the scorer is a kind of a amphidiploidy. sent14: if the heliometer does not whelp and it does not govern rifle then that the scorer is idiographic is not incorrect. sent15: if the scorer is not Spartan and is not a kind of a amphidiploidy then the tablemate is fishy. sent16: the tablemate does not radicalize. sent17: the scorer is a amphidiploidy if the tablemate does not govern rifle and is non-fishy. sent18: if the tablemate is a amphidiploidy either the heliometer is not a Spartan or it is idiographic or both. sent19: the tablemate is not a amphidiploidy. sent20: the scorer is a amphidiploidy if the tablemate is not fishy and it does not whelp. sent21: the scorer is a amphidiploidy. sent22: the tablemate either is a disheartenment or is a kind of a handling or both. sent23: the scorer is fishy. sent24: the heliometer does not govern rifle if it is not Spartan and/or it is idiographic. sent25: if the fact that the scorer is not fishy but it radicalizes is wrong then the sourpuss does not whelp. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scorer does radicalize.; assump1 & sent23 -> int1: the scorer does radicalize and it is fishy.; sent6 -> int2: if the scorer does radicalize and it is fishy that it does not whelp is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the scorer does not whelp.; sent3 -> int4: if the scorer is a kind of a Spartan and/or does not govern rifle then it does not govern rifle.; sent12 & sent19 -> int5: either the scorer is Spartan or it does not govern rifle or both.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the scorer does not govern rifle.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the scorer does not govern rifle and it does not whelp.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the heliometer is idiographic.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__