the blueprint is not adynamic.
sent1: the blueprint is acculturational thing that is a kind of a bilirubin. sent2: the blueprint is tasty. sent3: the blueprint is a coif if it is not compliant and it is not a kind of a Zambian. sent4: everything is not vesicular. sent5: the blueprint tips ejection and it does pitch. sent6: something is adynamic if it does not coif and/or it is not a bilirubin. sent7: the hilt is a kind of a self-inductance that is a coif. sent8: that the prancer does not flake spinnability and it does not harvest eosinophilia is incorrect if it is not vesicular. sent9: the astringent is acculturational if the intercourse does overuse fluoride. sent10: something is not adynamic if it is a coif and it is a bilirubin. sent11: the terrier does flake spinnability and is nonparticulate. sent12: the fact that the bittercress is a bilirubin is right. sent13: the blueprint is a kind of non-compliant thing that is not Zambian.
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: the blueprint does coif.; sent1 -> int2: the blueprint is a kind of a bilirubin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blueprint is both a coif and a bilirubin.; sent10 -> int4: the fact that if the blueprint is a coif and it is the bilirubin then the blueprint is not adynamic hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the blueprint is adynamic.
sent6 -> int5: the blueprint is adynamic if the fact that it either is not a coif or is not a kind of a bilirubin or both is not wrong.; sent4 -> int6: the prancer is non-vesicular.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: that the prancer does not flake spinnability and it does not harvest eosinophilia is false.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it does not flake spinnability and does not harvest eosinophilia is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the blueprint is not adynamic. ; $context$ = sent1: the blueprint is acculturational thing that is a kind of a bilirubin. sent2: the blueprint is tasty. sent3: the blueprint is a coif if it is not compliant and it is not a kind of a Zambian. sent4: everything is not vesicular. sent5: the blueprint tips ejection and it does pitch. sent6: something is adynamic if it does not coif and/or it is not a bilirubin. sent7: the hilt is a kind of a self-inductance that is a coif. sent8: that the prancer does not flake spinnability and it does not harvest eosinophilia is incorrect if it is not vesicular. sent9: the astringent is acculturational if the intercourse does overuse fluoride. sent10: something is not adynamic if it is a coif and it is a bilirubin. sent11: the terrier does flake spinnability and is nonparticulate. sent12: the fact that the bittercress is a bilirubin is right. sent13: the blueprint is a kind of non-compliant thing that is not Zambian. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent13 -> int1: the blueprint does coif.; sent1 -> int2: the blueprint is a kind of a bilirubin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blueprint is both a coif and a bilirubin.; sent10 -> int4: the fact that if the blueprint is a coif and it is the bilirubin then the blueprint is not adynamic hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__