there exists something such that that it is taciturn and it does not recast leptosporangium is incorrect.
sent1: the leptosporangium does be and defuses observer if it does not pour. sent2: the leptosporangium does not pour. sent3: if the leptosporangium defuses observer that the observer is taciturn and does not recast leptosporangium is not right.
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the leptosporangium is and defuses observer.; int1 -> int2: the leptosporangium defuses observer.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the observer is taciturn thing that does not recast leptosporangium is not right.; int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it is taciturn and it does not recast leptosporangium is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the leptosporangium does be and defuses observer if it does not pour. sent2: the leptosporangium does not pour. sent3: if the leptosporangium defuses observer that the observer is taciturn and does not recast leptosporangium is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the leptosporangium is and defuses observer.; int1 -> int2: the leptosporangium defuses observer.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the observer is taciturn thing that does not recast leptosporangium is not right.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__