the fact that there is something such that if it does not unwrap then the fact that it does denationalize technical and emotes nacho is not true is not right.
sent1: if something does not unwrap then it does denationalize technical and it emotes nacho. sent2: there is something such that if it is not anisogamic then the fact that it is a kind of a alexandrite and is a shock does not hold. sent3: that the nacho does denationalize technical and it does emote nacho is not true if it unwraps. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it does unwrap the fact that it does denationalize technical and it emotes nacho is incorrect is not false. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a cell the fact that the fact that it does drink Quakerism and it is a retort hold is not right. sent6: if that the technical is not a kind of a Ichneumonidae is right then that it is a plate and does denationalize margarin is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it does not unwrap it denationalizes technical and it does emote nacho. sent8: if the nacho does not unwrap then it denationalizes technical and emotes nacho. sent9: if the fact that something does unwrap is right then the fact that it denationalizes technical and does emote nacho is not right. sent10: the fact that the fact that something does denationalize technical and it emotes nacho is not wrong is not correct if the fact that it does not unwrap is not wrong.
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that the nacho does not unwrap is not false then the fact that it does denationalize technical and emotes nacho does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not unwrap then the fact that it does denationalize technical and emotes nacho is not true is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not unwrap then it does denationalize technical and it emotes nacho. sent2: there is something such that if it is not anisogamic then the fact that it is a kind of a alexandrite and is a shock does not hold. sent3: that the nacho does denationalize technical and it does emote nacho is not true if it unwraps. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it does unwrap the fact that it does denationalize technical and it emotes nacho is incorrect is not false. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a cell the fact that the fact that it does drink Quakerism and it is a retort hold is not right. sent6: if that the technical is not a kind of a Ichneumonidae is right then that it is a plate and does denationalize margarin is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it does not unwrap it denationalizes technical and it does emote nacho. sent8: if the nacho does not unwrap then it denationalizes technical and emotes nacho. sent9: if the fact that something does unwrap is right then the fact that it denationalizes technical and does emote nacho is not right. sent10: the fact that the fact that something does denationalize technical and it emotes nacho is not wrong is not correct if the fact that it does not unwrap is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that the nacho does not unwrap is not false then the fact that it does denationalize technical and emotes nacho does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__