the silvervine is a particulate.
sent1: that the couch is not a kind of a Kuomintang is right. sent2: the silvervine does patrol cassareep. sent3: the silvervine is chalybeate. sent4: the couch is a particulate that is not a Kuomintang. sent5: if something is a Mantispidae the silvervine is a Kuomintang and does not acquaint echinococcus. sent6: if the couch is etymological and it is a Kuomintang then the silvervine is a kind of a particulate. sent7: that the noradrenaline is particulate is correct. sent8: if the silvervine is both etymological and not a Kuomintang then the couch is a particulate. sent9: that the couch slights indumentum is not incorrect. sent10: there are particulate things. sent11: the couch is not a tuff but etymological if it is a Kuomintang. sent12: the fact that the silvervine is a kind of a rockfish that does not acquaint echinococcus is not false if there is something such that that it is a tuff is true. sent13: the silvervine is a Kuomintang and is not etymological if there is something such that it is a particulate. sent14: the silvervine does patrol waterpower but it is not forcipate if there is something such that it revises egg-and-dart. sent15: the silvervine is particulate if the couch is etymological thing that is not a Kuomintang. sent16: the couch is etymological and not a Kuomintang if something is a tuff. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a Kuomintang then the echinococcus is both Yuman and not away. sent18: the fact that the couch is not a Kuomintang hold if there exists something such that it is a tuff. sent19: that the couch is particulate but it is not a kind of a Kuomintang hold if there is something such that it is etymological. sent20: that something is etymological is not wrong. sent21: there is something such that that it is a tuff hold.
sent21 & sent16 -> int1: the couch is both not non-etymological and not a Kuomintang.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the silvervine is not a kind of a particulate.
$hypothesis$ = the silvervine is a particulate. ; $context$ = sent1: that the couch is not a kind of a Kuomintang is right. sent2: the silvervine does patrol cassareep. sent3: the silvervine is chalybeate. sent4: the couch is a particulate that is not a Kuomintang. sent5: if something is a Mantispidae the silvervine is a Kuomintang and does not acquaint echinococcus. sent6: if the couch is etymological and it is a Kuomintang then the silvervine is a kind of a particulate. sent7: that the noradrenaline is particulate is correct. sent8: if the silvervine is both etymological and not a Kuomintang then the couch is a particulate. sent9: that the couch slights indumentum is not incorrect. sent10: there are particulate things. sent11: the couch is not a tuff but etymological if it is a Kuomintang. sent12: the fact that the silvervine is a kind of a rockfish that does not acquaint echinococcus is not false if there is something such that that it is a tuff is true. sent13: the silvervine is a Kuomintang and is not etymological if there is something such that it is a particulate. sent14: the silvervine does patrol waterpower but it is not forcipate if there is something such that it revises egg-and-dart. sent15: the silvervine is particulate if the couch is etymological thing that is not a Kuomintang. sent16: the couch is etymological and not a Kuomintang if something is a tuff. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a Kuomintang then the echinococcus is both Yuman and not away. sent18: the fact that the couch is not a Kuomintang hold if there exists something such that it is a tuff. sent19: that the couch is particulate but it is not a kind of a Kuomintang hold if there is something such that it is etymological. sent20: that something is etymological is not wrong. sent21: there is something such that that it is a tuff hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent16 -> int1: the couch is both not non-etymological and not a Kuomintang.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__