the discernibleness occurs.
sent1: that the titillating occurs and the depressurizing grove does not occur triggers the non-high-tensionness. sent2: that the u-turn does not occur is caused by that the high-tensionness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that that the titillating but not the depressurizing grove happens is not false is false the discernibleness happens. sent4: the fact that the leftfield but not the pneumococcalness occurs does not hold. sent5: the lecturing occurs. sent6: that the u-turn and the lecture happens is caused by that the branchiness does not occur. sent7: the branchiness does not occur. sent8: if that the high-tensionness happens and the u-turn occurs does not hold then the discernibleness does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the lecturing does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the fact that the high-tensionness occurs and the u-turn happens hold is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the titillating happens but the depressurizing grove does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the high-tensionness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the u-turn does not occur.; sent6 & sent7 -> int3: the u-turn and the lecturing happens.; int3 -> int4: the u-turn happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the titillating happens and the depressurizing grove does not occur is incorrect.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the discernibleness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the discernibleness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the titillating occurs and the depressurizing grove does not occur triggers the non-high-tensionness. sent2: that the u-turn does not occur is caused by that the high-tensionness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that that the titillating but not the depressurizing grove happens is not false is false the discernibleness happens. sent4: the fact that the leftfield but not the pneumococcalness occurs does not hold. sent5: the lecturing occurs. sent6: that the u-turn and the lecture happens is caused by that the branchiness does not occur. sent7: the branchiness does not occur. sent8: if that the high-tensionness happens and the u-turn occurs does not hold then the discernibleness does not occur. sent9: if the fact that the lecturing does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that the fact that the high-tensionness occurs and the u-turn happens hold is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the titillating happens but the depressurizing grove does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the high-tensionness does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the u-turn does not occur.; sent6 & sent7 -> int3: the u-turn and the lecturing happens.; int3 -> int4: the u-turn happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the titillating happens and the depressurizing grove does not occur is incorrect.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__