the fact that that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur does not hold if the choppiness does not occur is not right.
sent1: the fact that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur if that the anarchisticness does not occur is true is not wrong. sent2: the turfing microcyte does not occur. sent3: the flattening process-server does not occur. sent4: the fact that not the awakening but the turfing proctology happens is wrong. sent5: if the choppiness does not occur the fact that the awakening but not the turfing proctology happens does not hold. sent6: that the awakening does not occur but the turfing proctology occurs does not hold if the choppiness does not occur. sent7: that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur is brought about by that the choppiness does not occur. sent8: the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur. sent9: the lymphoidness does not occur and the enhancement does not occur. sent10: if the anarchisticness does not occur then the fact that the awakening happens and the turfing proctology does not occur is false. sent11: the mathematicalness does not occur and the lifting does not occur. sent12: the fact that that not the manual but the reasonableness occurs is correct is false. sent13: that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur is not true if the anarchisticness does not occur. sent14: the reasonableness prevents that the anarchisticness happens. sent15: if the fact that both the non-manualness and the non-reasonableness occurs is false the fact that the anarchisticness does not occur hold. sent16: that the choppiness occurs and/or the flattening process-server prevents the reasonableness. sent17: that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology occurs is false if that the anarchisticness does not occur is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the protestation does not occur and the moon does not occur is not correct. sent19: the filarialness does not occur. sent20: the reasonableness does not occur. sent21: the choppiness is triggered by that the manual does not occur and the flattening process-server does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the non-manualness and the unreasonableness occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the manualness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the manual does not occur and the flattening process-server does not occur.; sent21 & int2 -> int3: the choppiness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the choppiness does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the manualness does not occur and the reasonableness does not occur is wrong.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the anarchisticness does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the fact that that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur does not hold is true.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the naiveness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur does not hold if the choppiness does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur if that the anarchisticness does not occur is true is not wrong. sent2: the turfing microcyte does not occur. sent3: the flattening process-server does not occur. sent4: the fact that not the awakening but the turfing proctology happens is wrong. sent5: if the choppiness does not occur the fact that the awakening but not the turfing proctology happens does not hold. sent6: that the awakening does not occur but the turfing proctology occurs does not hold if the choppiness does not occur. sent7: that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur is brought about by that the choppiness does not occur. sent8: the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur. sent9: the lymphoidness does not occur and the enhancement does not occur. sent10: if the anarchisticness does not occur then the fact that the awakening happens and the turfing proctology does not occur is false. sent11: the mathematicalness does not occur and the lifting does not occur. sent12: the fact that that not the manual but the reasonableness occurs is correct is false. sent13: that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur is not true if the anarchisticness does not occur. sent14: the reasonableness prevents that the anarchisticness happens. sent15: if the fact that both the non-manualness and the non-reasonableness occurs is false the fact that the anarchisticness does not occur hold. sent16: that the choppiness occurs and/or the flattening process-server prevents the reasonableness. sent17: that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology occurs is false if that the anarchisticness does not occur is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the protestation does not occur and the moon does not occur is not correct. sent19: the filarialness does not occur. sent20: the reasonableness does not occur. sent21: the choppiness is triggered by that the manual does not occur and the flattening process-server does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the non-manualness and the unreasonableness occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the manualness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the manual does not occur and the flattening process-server does not occur.; sent21 & int2 -> int3: the choppiness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the choppiness does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the manualness does not occur and the reasonableness does not occur is wrong.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the anarchisticness does not occur.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the fact that that the awakening does not occur and the turfing proctology does not occur does not hold is true.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__