that the entrusting cuisse but not the sputter happens is not right if the Javanese occurs.
sent1: the fact that the entrusting copilot occurs but the psyop does not occur is not true if that the entrusting rand occurs is correct. sent2: if the mediatoriness occurs the fact that the entrusting cuisse occurs and the sputter does not occur is wrong. sent3: if the Javaneseness happens the entrusting cuisse occurs but the sputter does not occur. sent4: the tribalization occurs. sent5: the fact that the entrusting cuisse occurs and the sputtering occurs is incorrect. sent6: that the entrusting cuisse and the sputter occurs is not correct if that the mediatoriness occurs hold. sent7: if the radioing circumscription occurs then that the tribalization but not the entrusting Lastex happens does not hold. sent8: the non-mediatoryness is prevented by that the Javaneseness happens. sent9: the single-laneness occurs. sent10: if the sameness happens then that the monopsony occurs and the residence does not occur is not true. sent11: if the mediatoriness happens the entrusting cuisse occurs but the sputter does not occur. sent12: the fact that that both the entrusting cuisse and the sputtering occurs is not correct is not incorrect if the Javanese occurs. sent13: the entrusting cuisse happens and the sputtering does not occur. sent14: that the radioing side-glance and the non-postalness happens is not correct if the fact that the experimenting happens is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Javanese happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the mediatoriness occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: that the entrusting cuisse happens and the sputtering does not occur is not true.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the entrusting cuisse but not the sputter happens is not right if the Javanese occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the entrusting copilot occurs but the psyop does not occur is not true if that the entrusting rand occurs is correct. sent2: if the mediatoriness occurs the fact that the entrusting cuisse occurs and the sputter does not occur is wrong. sent3: if the Javaneseness happens the entrusting cuisse occurs but the sputter does not occur. sent4: the tribalization occurs. sent5: the fact that the entrusting cuisse occurs and the sputtering occurs is incorrect. sent6: that the entrusting cuisse and the sputter occurs is not correct if that the mediatoriness occurs hold. sent7: if the radioing circumscription occurs then that the tribalization but not the entrusting Lastex happens does not hold. sent8: the non-mediatoryness is prevented by that the Javaneseness happens. sent9: the single-laneness occurs. sent10: if the sameness happens then that the monopsony occurs and the residence does not occur is not true. sent11: if the mediatoriness happens the entrusting cuisse occurs but the sputter does not occur. sent12: the fact that that both the entrusting cuisse and the sputtering occurs is not correct is not incorrect if the Javanese occurs. sent13: the entrusting cuisse happens and the sputtering does not occur. sent14: that the radioing side-glance and the non-postalness happens is not correct if the fact that the experimenting happens is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Javanese happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the mediatoriness occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: that the entrusting cuisse happens and the sputtering does not occur is not true.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__