the weeding pulsation does not occur.
sent1: if the solution does not occur then the fact that the anaclinalness does not occur and the weeding pulsation does not occur does not hold. sent2: if that the predominating does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that both the solution and the non-grassiness occurs is incorrect. sent3: if the predominating happens then the solution does not occur. sent4: if the ontogeneticness but not the fudging similarity happens then the beef does not occur. sent5: the fact that the vigil occurs is not incorrect. sent6: the bignoniaceousness does not occur if the anaclinalness does not occur and the solution occurs. sent7: that the solution does not occur hold. sent8: the non-bignoniaceousness is prevented by that the ontogeneticness happens. sent9: if the fact that the fact that both the solution and the non-grassyness happens hold does not hold the solution does not occur. sent10: that the alchemisticness occurs triggers that the predominating does not occur and/or the non-grassiness. sent11: if the beef does not occur then the ovineness does not occur but the slander happens. sent12: if the fudging similarity occurs then that the ontogeneticness happens is not wrong. sent13: the beef occurs and the fudging similarity occurs. sent14: that the predominating does not occur is caused by that the predominating does not occur and/or the grassiness does not occur. sent15: the predominating happens. sent16: if the fudging similarity does not occur both the weeding pulsation and the beef happens. sent17: the anaclinalness is prevented by that the bignoniaceousness happens and the weeding pulsation happens. sent18: the voice happens. sent19: that the gingivalness does not occur triggers that the alchemisticness does not occur and the predominating does not occur. sent20: the beef happens.
sent13 -> int1: the fudging similarity occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the ontogeneticness happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the bignoniaceousness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weeding pulsation occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bignoniaceousness and the weeding pulsation occurs.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the anaclinalness does not occur.;
not the ovineness but the slander occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the weeding pulsation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the solution does not occur then the fact that the anaclinalness does not occur and the weeding pulsation does not occur does not hold. sent2: if that the predominating does not occur is not incorrect then the fact that both the solution and the non-grassiness occurs is incorrect. sent3: if the predominating happens then the solution does not occur. sent4: if the ontogeneticness but not the fudging similarity happens then the beef does not occur. sent5: the fact that the vigil occurs is not incorrect. sent6: the bignoniaceousness does not occur if the anaclinalness does not occur and the solution occurs. sent7: that the solution does not occur hold. sent8: the non-bignoniaceousness is prevented by that the ontogeneticness happens. sent9: if the fact that the fact that both the solution and the non-grassyness happens hold does not hold the solution does not occur. sent10: that the alchemisticness occurs triggers that the predominating does not occur and/or the non-grassiness. sent11: if the beef does not occur then the ovineness does not occur but the slander happens. sent12: if the fudging similarity occurs then that the ontogeneticness happens is not wrong. sent13: the beef occurs and the fudging similarity occurs. sent14: that the predominating does not occur is caused by that the predominating does not occur and/or the grassiness does not occur. sent15: the predominating happens. sent16: if the fudging similarity does not occur both the weeding pulsation and the beef happens. sent17: the anaclinalness is prevented by that the bignoniaceousness happens and the weeding pulsation happens. sent18: the voice happens. sent19: that the gingivalness does not occur triggers that the alchemisticness does not occur and the predominating does not occur. sent20: the beef happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the fudging similarity occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the ontogeneticness happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the bignoniaceousness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weeding pulsation occurs.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bignoniaceousness and the weeding pulsation occurs.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the anaclinalness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__