that either the adjutant greets progress or it is ethnographic or both is not true.
sent1: the adjutant is a kind of a eventration and it is a kind of a waffle. sent2: the fact that something is not capacitive if it is not postmillennial hold. sent3: if something is a Jap it refreshes Talbot. sent4: if something is not anterior then it does not refresh Talbot. sent5: if the fact that something is ethnographic but it is not a Jap is not correct then it does refresh Talbot. sent6: if that the pegmatite is a kind of a waffle that is a eventration is not correct the microphage is not a kind of a waffle. sent7: the barbasco does not refresh Talbot and is a kind of an anterior if the microphage is not a kind of a waffle. sent8: the adjutant is not an anterior if it is a eventration that is a kind of a waffle. sent9: the adjutant is a kind of a waffle. sent10: if the fact that the barbasco is a kind of a waffle that is not anterior does not hold it does not refresh Talbot.
sent5 -> int1: the adjutant refreshes Talbot if that it is ethnographic and it is not a Jap is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the adjutant is ethnographic and is not a kind of a Jap does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the adjutant refreshes Talbot.; sent4 -> int3: if the adjutant is not an anterior then it does not refresh Talbot.; sent8 & sent1 -> int4: the adjutant is not an anterior.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the adjutant does not refresh Talbot.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the adjutant is ethnographic but it is not a kind of a Jap.; int7 -> int8: the adjutant is ethnographic.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the monohybrid is binary and ethnographic.
$hypothesis$ = that either the adjutant greets progress or it is ethnographic or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the adjutant is a kind of a eventration and it is a kind of a waffle. sent2: the fact that something is not capacitive if it is not postmillennial hold. sent3: if something is a Jap it refreshes Talbot. sent4: if something is not anterior then it does not refresh Talbot. sent5: if the fact that something is ethnographic but it is not a Jap is not correct then it does refresh Talbot. sent6: if that the pegmatite is a kind of a waffle that is a eventration is not correct the microphage is not a kind of a waffle. sent7: the barbasco does not refresh Talbot and is a kind of an anterior if the microphage is not a kind of a waffle. sent8: the adjutant is not an anterior if it is a eventration that is a kind of a waffle. sent9: the adjutant is a kind of a waffle. sent10: if the fact that the barbasco is a kind of a waffle that is not anterior does not hold it does not refresh Talbot. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the adjutant refreshes Talbot if that it is ethnographic and it is not a Jap is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the adjutant is ethnographic and is not a kind of a Jap does not hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the adjutant refreshes Talbot.; sent4 -> int3: if the adjutant is not an anterior then it does not refresh Talbot.; sent8 & sent1 -> int4: the adjutant is not an anterior.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the adjutant does not refresh Talbot.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the adjutant is ethnographic but it is not a kind of a Jap.; int7 -> int8: the adjutant is ethnographic.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__