the fact that the malpractice does not occur is not incorrect if the imitativeness happens.
sent1: the diminishing neuropsychiatry occurs. sent2: that the malpractice occurs is prevented by that not the rectification but the idolatry happens. sent3: the imitativeness does not occur if the fact that the rectification does not occur but the idolatry occurs is incorrect. sent4: the blastoporalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the imitativeness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that that the rectification does not occur but the idolatry happens is incorrect is not wrong.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the imitativeness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: not the rectification but the idolatry happens.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the malpractice does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the malpractice does not occur is not incorrect if the imitativeness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the diminishing neuropsychiatry occurs. sent2: that the malpractice occurs is prevented by that not the rectification but the idolatry happens. sent3: the imitativeness does not occur if the fact that the rectification does not occur but the idolatry occurs is incorrect. sent4: the blastoporalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the imitativeness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that that the rectification does not occur but the idolatry happens is incorrect is not wrong.; sent3 & assump2 -> int1: the imitativeness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: not the rectification but the idolatry happens.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the malpractice does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__