the desquamation is not a club.
sent1: the gawker is not an extremist if it is a kind of a patriarchate or it does frighten Veronese or both. sent2: if the launce is unlivable the AI either is not summery or resounds or both. sent3: the desquamation is not a leaner if it is a SVR or it greets or both. sent4: if the calyculus is a SVR the desquamation is a club. sent5: the snakefly is a kind of a patriarchate. sent6: the desquamation is a paretic and shops. sent7: if either the desquamation thinks Gaea or it is a SVR or both then it does not operate. sent8: if that something is both not a SVR and not a club is incorrect it is a SVR. sent9: if the desquamation frightens crane and/or it is a kind of a club it does not think hellgrammiate. sent10: if the clam is a kind of a holonym and/or it is a kind of a nerves it is not operationalist. sent11: everything is both a collateral and not non-aneroid. sent12: the desquamation is not aerolitic if it is a Arawak. sent13: if something is a nerves that it is not a kind of a SVR and it is not a club is not correct. sent14: something is unlivable if it is not non-aneroid. sent15: if the AI is not a patriarchate then the fact that that the cacao is a nerves but it is not a SVR hold is not true. sent16: something is not a patriarchate if it is not summery or does resound or both. sent17: the desquamation is a turned and it is not non-French. sent18: the iodide does club. sent19: the desquamation is a SVR that is a kind of a patriarchate.
sent19 -> int1: the desquamation is a patriarchate.; int1 -> int2: the desquamation is a patriarchate and/or it is a nerves.;
the godwit is a patriarchate.
sent13 -> int3: that the desquamation is not a SVR and is not a club is wrong if it is a nerves.; sent8 -> int4: if that the godwit is not a kind of a SVR and it is not a club does not hold then it is a kind of a SVR.;
$hypothesis$ = the desquamation is not a club. ; $context$ = sent1: the gawker is not an extremist if it is a kind of a patriarchate or it does frighten Veronese or both. sent2: if the launce is unlivable the AI either is not summery or resounds or both. sent3: the desquamation is not a leaner if it is a SVR or it greets or both. sent4: if the calyculus is a SVR the desquamation is a club. sent5: the snakefly is a kind of a patriarchate. sent6: the desquamation is a paretic and shops. sent7: if either the desquamation thinks Gaea or it is a SVR or both then it does not operate. sent8: if that something is both not a SVR and not a club is incorrect it is a SVR. sent9: if the desquamation frightens crane and/or it is a kind of a club it does not think hellgrammiate. sent10: if the clam is a kind of a holonym and/or it is a kind of a nerves it is not operationalist. sent11: everything is both a collateral and not non-aneroid. sent12: the desquamation is not aerolitic if it is a Arawak. sent13: if something is a nerves that it is not a kind of a SVR and it is not a club is not correct. sent14: something is unlivable if it is not non-aneroid. sent15: if the AI is not a patriarchate then the fact that that the cacao is a nerves but it is not a SVR hold is not true. sent16: something is not a patriarchate if it is not summery or does resound or both. sent17: the desquamation is a turned and it is not non-French. sent18: the iodide does club. sent19: the desquamation is a SVR that is a kind of a patriarchate. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the desquamation is a patriarchate.; int1 -> int2: the desquamation is a patriarchate and/or it is a nerves.; __UNKNOWN__