the birdlime is ctenoid and it is a solution.
sent1: the bream does not adapt huckster. sent2: the goldcrest is Hitlerian. sent3: the bream airbrushes if it is a streptolysin. sent4: the fact that the bream does inspect is right if the birdlime is categorematic. sent5: the fact that the ropemaker inspects hold. sent6: if the birdlime is not Hitlerian but it is a Masoud it is ctenoid. sent7: the bream does not airbrush. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a solution and does reorient snicker is incorrect it is a solution. sent9: if something does inspect that it is a streptolysin hold. sent10: the birdlime is categorematic if that it is non-Hitlerian a Masoud does not hold. sent11: the bream is not a solution. sent12: that the birdlime is not a kind of a solution but it does reorient snicker is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the birdlime is not Hitlerian but it is a Masoud is wrong.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the birdlime is categorematic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the bream does inspect.; sent9 -> int3: the bream is a streptolysin if it inspects.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bream is a kind of a streptolysin.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the bream is a kind of a airbrush.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the birdlime is both non-Hitlerian and a Masoud.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the birdlime is ctenoid.; sent8 -> int9: that the birdlime is a kind of a solution is right if the fact that it is not a solution and does reorient snicker is not true.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the birdlime is a solution.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the birdlime is ctenoid and it is a solution. ; $context$ = sent1: the bream does not adapt huckster. sent2: the goldcrest is Hitlerian. sent3: the bream airbrushes if it is a streptolysin. sent4: the fact that the bream does inspect is right if the birdlime is categorematic. sent5: the fact that the ropemaker inspects hold. sent6: if the birdlime is not Hitlerian but it is a Masoud it is ctenoid. sent7: the bream does not airbrush. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a solution and does reorient snicker is incorrect it is a solution. sent9: if something does inspect that it is a streptolysin hold. sent10: the birdlime is categorematic if that it is non-Hitlerian a Masoud does not hold. sent11: the bream is not a solution. sent12: that the birdlime is not a kind of a solution but it does reorient snicker is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the birdlime is not Hitlerian but it is a Masoud is wrong.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the birdlime is categorematic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the bream does inspect.; sent9 -> int3: the bream is a streptolysin if it inspects.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bream is a kind of a streptolysin.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the bream is a kind of a airbrush.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the birdlime is both non-Hitlerian and a Masoud.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the birdlime is ctenoid.; sent8 -> int9: that the birdlime is a kind of a solution is right if the fact that it is not a solution and does reorient snicker is not true.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the birdlime is a solution.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__