the fact that the allspice is a kind of a granola and it is hilar is not correct.
sent1: the relative does not meow if it is a radiophotography and hilar. sent2: there exists something such that it is not buccal and it is not an arrayed. sent3: if the inkberry is a kind of non-busy a Livonian then it is not hilar. sent4: the fact that the relative is a kind of a Abelmoschus but it is not a meow does not hold. sent5: if something is not morphophonemics then the fact that it is a Livonian and does not individuate devaluation is incorrect. sent6: if that something is a kind of a refill but it does not kidnap fixture is incorrect it is not astrological. sent7: if the inkberry is not hilar then the allspice is a granola and it is hilar. sent8: if the fact that that the calceus is a kind of a Livonian but it does not individuate devaluation is not correct is not false then the fact that it is not a kind of a Livonian is not false. sent9: if the inkberry busies and it is a Livonian then it is not hilar. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not buccal and it is not a kind of an arrayed the calceus is not morphophonemics. sent11: if there is something such that it is not a radiophotography the inkberry does not busy but it is a kind of a Livonian. sent12: the fact that the relative is hilar and it does meow is not true. sent13: if that something is a Abelmoschus and does not meow does not hold then it is not a radiophotography. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a granola the inkberry is not hilar but it is busy.
sent13 -> int1: if the fact that the relative is a Abelmoschus but it is not a kind of a meow is not right it is not a radiophotography.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the relative is not a radiophotography.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a radiophotography.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the inkberry is both not busy and a Livonian.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the inkberry is not hilar.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the allspice is a granola and it is hilar does not hold.
sent5 -> int6: that the calceus is a Livonian and does not individuate devaluation is false if it is not morphophonemics.; sent2 & sent10 -> int7: the calceus is not morphophonemics.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the calceus is a kind of a Livonian but it does not individuate devaluation is not right.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the calceus is not a Livonian.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not a Livonian.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the allspice is a kind of a granola and it is hilar is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the relative does not meow if it is a radiophotography and hilar. sent2: there exists something such that it is not buccal and it is not an arrayed. sent3: if the inkberry is a kind of non-busy a Livonian then it is not hilar. sent4: the fact that the relative is a kind of a Abelmoschus but it is not a meow does not hold. sent5: if something is not morphophonemics then the fact that it is a Livonian and does not individuate devaluation is incorrect. sent6: if that something is a kind of a refill but it does not kidnap fixture is incorrect it is not astrological. sent7: if the inkberry is not hilar then the allspice is a granola and it is hilar. sent8: if the fact that that the calceus is a kind of a Livonian but it does not individuate devaluation is not correct is not false then the fact that it is not a kind of a Livonian is not false. sent9: if the inkberry busies and it is a Livonian then it is not hilar. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not buccal and it is not a kind of an arrayed the calceus is not morphophonemics. sent11: if there is something such that it is not a radiophotography the inkberry does not busy but it is a kind of a Livonian. sent12: the fact that the relative is hilar and it does meow is not true. sent13: if that something is a Abelmoschus and does not meow does not hold then it is not a radiophotography. sent14: if there is something such that it is not a granola the inkberry is not hilar but it is busy. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the fact that the relative is a Abelmoschus but it is not a kind of a meow is not right it is not a radiophotography.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the relative is not a radiophotography.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a radiophotography.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the inkberry is both not busy and a Livonian.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the inkberry is not hilar.; int5 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__