the gold does not expire ministrant.
sent1: something that is not a slack and is a kind of a pyrogen does expire ministrant. sent2: if that either the piggery is thalassic or it is non-collagenous or both is false it is not distinguishable. sent3: the fact that the piggery is thalassic and/or not collagenous is not true. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of an epidural but it is psychological is wrong if it is not paleocortical. sent5: that something is both not epidural and psychological if it is not distinguishable is right. sent6: if there is something such that it is paleocortical then the gold is not a slack but it is a pyrogen. sent7: the fact that the decal is a pyrogen and it does slack is not right.
sent4 -> int1: if the piggery is not paleocortical the fact that it is not an epidural and is psychological is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the piggery is not paleocortical.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the piggery is not an epidural but it is psychological is not correct.; sent5 -> int3: if the piggery is not distinguishable then it is not an epidural but psychological.; sent2 & sent3 -> int4: the piggery is not distinguishable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the piggery is not epidural but psychological.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the piggery is paleocortical.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is paleocortical.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the gold is not a slack and is a pyrogen.; sent1 -> int10: that the gold expires ministrant is true if it does not slack and it is a pyrogen.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the gold does not expire ministrant.
$hypothesis$ = the gold does not expire ministrant. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not a slack and is a kind of a pyrogen does expire ministrant. sent2: if that either the piggery is thalassic or it is non-collagenous or both is false it is not distinguishable. sent3: the fact that the piggery is thalassic and/or not collagenous is not true. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of an epidural but it is psychological is wrong if it is not paleocortical. sent5: that something is both not epidural and psychological if it is not distinguishable is right. sent6: if there is something such that it is paleocortical then the gold is not a slack but it is a pyrogen. sent7: the fact that the decal is a pyrogen and it does slack is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the piggery is not paleocortical the fact that it is not an epidural and is psychological is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the piggery is not paleocortical.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the piggery is not an epidural but it is psychological is not correct.; sent5 -> int3: if the piggery is not distinguishable then it is not an epidural but psychological.; sent2 & sent3 -> int4: the piggery is not distinguishable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the piggery is not epidural but psychological.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the piggery is paleocortical.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is paleocortical.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the gold is not a slack and is a pyrogen.; sent1 -> int10: that the gold expires ministrant is true if it does not slack and it is a pyrogen.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__