that that the clotheshorse does synthesize Meyerhof or it does group or both does not hold hold.
sent1: the ghillie is vicennial and it is fathomable. sent2: the punkah is not granulocytic if there exists something such that it styles Pavo. sent3: the fact that the punkah is not a proverb but it does style Pavo is not right if the washwoman is a kind of a proverb. sent4: if something is a conidium but it is not a broad the Latinist does style Pavo. sent5: there is something such that it is a Vanbrugh and it is granulocytic. sent6: the washwoman is not a Vanbrugh if there exists something such that that it is a Vanbrugh and is not a proverb is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the ghillie is vicennial is not incorrect then it is a conidium and it is not a kind of a broad. sent8: if something is a kind of a Vanbrugh and it is granulocytic the washwoman is a proverb. sent9: if that the punkah is not a proverb but it styles Pavo is not true the clotheshorse is a group. sent10: that the punkah is a kind of a Vanbrugh and is not a kind of a proverb does not hold if it is not granulocytic.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the washwoman is a kind of a proverb.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: that the punkah is not a proverb but it styles Pavo does not hold.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the clotheshorse does group.; int3 -> hypothesis;
that the clotheshorse synthesizes Meyerhof or it is a group or both does not hold.
sent1 -> int4: the ghillie is vicennial.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the ghillie is both a conidium and not broad.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a conidium and is not a broad.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the Latinist does style Pavo.; int7 -> int8: something styles Pavo.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the punkah is not granulocytic.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: that the punkah is a kind of a Vanbrugh that is not a proverb is not correct.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is a Vanbrugh and it is not a proverb is false.; int11 & sent6 -> int12: the washwoman is not a kind of a Vanbrugh.; int12 -> int13: something is not a Vanbrugh.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the clotheshorse does synthesize Meyerhof or it does group or both does not hold hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the ghillie is vicennial and it is fathomable. sent2: the punkah is not granulocytic if there exists something such that it styles Pavo. sent3: the fact that the punkah is not a proverb but it does style Pavo is not right if the washwoman is a kind of a proverb. sent4: if something is a conidium but it is not a broad the Latinist does style Pavo. sent5: there is something such that it is a Vanbrugh and it is granulocytic. sent6: the washwoman is not a Vanbrugh if there exists something such that that it is a Vanbrugh and is not a proverb is wrong. sent7: if the fact that the ghillie is vicennial is not incorrect then it is a conidium and it is not a kind of a broad. sent8: if something is a kind of a Vanbrugh and it is granulocytic the washwoman is a proverb. sent9: if that the punkah is not a proverb but it styles Pavo is not true the clotheshorse is a group. sent10: that the punkah is a kind of a Vanbrugh and is not a kind of a proverb does not hold if it is not granulocytic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the washwoman is a kind of a proverb.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: that the punkah is not a proverb but it styles Pavo does not hold.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the clotheshorse does group.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__