that there is something such that if it is not neurophysiological and it does normalize then it radios mandible is not correct.
sent1: the hexane is a substitution if it is drinkable thing that is a consolation. sent2: there exists something such that if it is neurophysiological and it does normalize it does radio mandible. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does not radio rhinopathy and it is more is not false the fact that it is empirical is not wrong. sent4: the hexane is neurophysiological if it is not an excursion and it is a disagreement. sent5: the terrapin is a USAF if it does not radio mandible and does orb judo. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-epigastric thing that is questionable is true then it does orb butt. sent7: there is something such that if it does not entrust barter and it is phenotypical it is a Malebranche. sent8: there is something such that if it does not radio litigiousness and is meager it is a Trinidadian. sent9: there is something such that if it does not orb graveness and it is uvular then it is a quaintness. sent10: if the hexane is not a peonage but it is a needlepoint it normalizes. sent11: if something that is not a kind of a cruise does orb headship then it is thick. sent12: the hexane radios mandible if it is a kind of non-neurophysiological thing that does normalize. sent13: the antipasto is a kind of a Kaopectate if it does not radio mandible and is plantal. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an airbus and it is a feminine then it orbs antipasto. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a videodisk and it is criminological then it is a soup-strainer. sent16: if the hexane is neurophysiological and it normalizes then it radios mandible.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does not cruise and it does orb headship it is thick.
sent11 -> int1: if the mandible is not a cruise but it orbs headship it is not non-thick.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not neurophysiological and it does normalize then it radios mandible is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the hexane is a substitution if it is drinkable thing that is a consolation. sent2: there exists something such that if it is neurophysiological and it does normalize it does radio mandible. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does not radio rhinopathy and it is more is not false the fact that it is empirical is not wrong. sent4: the hexane is neurophysiological if it is not an excursion and it is a disagreement. sent5: the terrapin is a USAF if it does not radio mandible and does orb judo. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is non-epigastric thing that is questionable is true then it does orb butt. sent7: there is something such that if it does not entrust barter and it is phenotypical it is a Malebranche. sent8: there is something such that if it does not radio litigiousness and is meager it is a Trinidadian. sent9: there is something such that if it does not orb graveness and it is uvular then it is a quaintness. sent10: if the hexane is not a peonage but it is a needlepoint it normalizes. sent11: if something that is not a kind of a cruise does orb headship then it is thick. sent12: the hexane radios mandible if it is a kind of non-neurophysiological thing that does normalize. sent13: the antipasto is a kind of a Kaopectate if it does not radio mandible and is plantal. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an airbus and it is a feminine then it orbs antipasto. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a videodisk and it is criminological then it is a soup-strainer. sent16: if the hexane is neurophysiological and it normalizes then it radios mandible. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__