the seashell is a Apogonidae.
sent1: the seashell is not diffusing if that the landline is a Apogonidae is not false. sent2: if something is not a Apogonidae the fact that it is cheliferous and it is not diffusing does not hold. sent3: that the landline is unregretful and a Apogonidae is incorrect. sent4: the used-car is not a parisology if that it is a parisology that is a carpal does not hold. sent5: if that the landline is a kind of unregretful thing that is not diffusing is not true the seashell is not a Apogonidae. sent6: that the seashell is a Apogonidae but it is not diffusing is incorrect. sent7: if something is palpable it is a kind of a Apogonidae. sent8: the VLDL does not diffuse. sent9: if that the paleographer is palpable is not wrong the seashell is palpable. sent10: if something is palpable then that it is a kind of a Apogonidae that is not a Maoist is wrong. sent11: the acanthion is not a flatmate but it is a tree-frog if it is not a kind of a anisotropy. sent12: if the acanthion is not a kind of a flatmate then the paleographer irradiates Jew's-ear and is bladdery. sent13: that the landline does diffuse and is a Apogonidae is wrong. sent14: if the fact that the seashell is diffusing and is not unregretful does not hold that the landline is not a Apogonidae is not incorrect. sent15: the seashell is not a Apogonidae if the landline is not unregretful. sent16: if that the used-car is not a parisology is not wrong then the acanthion is not a anisotropy but it does lexicalize branched. sent17: there exists nothing such that it is unregretful and is non-diffusing. sent18: if the fact that the landline is not a flatmate and is bladdery does not hold then it does not irradiate Jew's-ear. sent19: something is palpable if it irradiates Jew's-ear.
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the landline is unregretful and is not diffusing is not true.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the landline is cheliferous but it is not diffusing hold is not true.
sent2 -> int2: the fact that the landline is cheliferous but it is not diffusing is not correct if it is not a Apogonidae.;
$hypothesis$ = the seashell is a Apogonidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the seashell is not diffusing if that the landline is a Apogonidae is not false. sent2: if something is not a Apogonidae the fact that it is cheliferous and it is not diffusing does not hold. sent3: that the landline is unregretful and a Apogonidae is incorrect. sent4: the used-car is not a parisology if that it is a parisology that is a carpal does not hold. sent5: if that the landline is a kind of unregretful thing that is not diffusing is not true the seashell is not a Apogonidae. sent6: that the seashell is a Apogonidae but it is not diffusing is incorrect. sent7: if something is palpable it is a kind of a Apogonidae. sent8: the VLDL does not diffuse. sent9: if that the paleographer is palpable is not wrong the seashell is palpable. sent10: if something is palpable then that it is a kind of a Apogonidae that is not a Maoist is wrong. sent11: the acanthion is not a flatmate but it is a tree-frog if it is not a kind of a anisotropy. sent12: if the acanthion is not a kind of a flatmate then the paleographer irradiates Jew's-ear and is bladdery. sent13: that the landline does diffuse and is a Apogonidae is wrong. sent14: if the fact that the seashell is diffusing and is not unregretful does not hold that the landline is not a Apogonidae is not incorrect. sent15: the seashell is not a Apogonidae if the landline is not unregretful. sent16: if that the used-car is not a parisology is not wrong then the acanthion is not a anisotropy but it does lexicalize branched. sent17: there exists nothing such that it is unregretful and is non-diffusing. sent18: if the fact that the landline is not a flatmate and is bladdery does not hold then it does not irradiate Jew's-ear. sent19: something is palpable if it irradiates Jew's-ear. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the landline is unregretful and is not diffusing is not true.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__