the fact that the varnishing vaquero occurs if the biosystematicsness happens is not right.
sent1: if that both the non-amenorrheicness and the non-blastogeneticness happens is not correct then the ignoring rating does not occur. sent2: if the varnishing vaquero does not occur then that either the pea-souper happens or the flicking square occurs or both does not hold. sent3: the flicking square does not occur. sent4: that the effort happens is right. sent5: the varnishing vaquero occurs or the biosystematicsness happens or both if the ignoring rating does not occur. sent6: the biosystematicsness does not occur if the fact that either the pea-souper or the flicking square or both occurs is false. sent7: if the stearicness occurs then the fact that both the non-amenorrheicness and the non-blastogeneticness happens is not correct. sent8: if that the biosystematicsness does not occur and the varnishing vaquero does not occur is false then the offsideness does not occur. sent9: that the stearicness happens and the liberty occurs is brought about by that the varnishing passerine does not occur. sent10: if the fact that either the pea-souper or the flicking square or both happens is false then the biosystematicsness happens. sent11: the flicking square does not occur if the varnishing vaquero does not occur. sent12: that the cleaning happens and/or the varnishing Volapuk happens is not correct if the ignoring promiser does not occur. sent13: the ignoring ingot occurs. sent14: if that the ignoring rating happens is right then the fact that the biosystematicsness does not occur and the varnishing vaquero does not occur is false. sent15: the magnification does not occur. sent16: if the flicking Nansen occurs not the varnishing passerine but the goneness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the biosystematicsness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the varnishing vaquero does not occur is right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pea-souper occurs and/or the flicking square happens is not correct.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the biosystematicsness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the varnishing vaquero happens is true.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the offside does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the varnishing vaquero occurs if the biosystematicsness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that both the non-amenorrheicness and the non-blastogeneticness happens is not correct then the ignoring rating does not occur. sent2: if the varnishing vaquero does not occur then that either the pea-souper happens or the flicking square occurs or both does not hold. sent3: the flicking square does not occur. sent4: that the effort happens is right. sent5: the varnishing vaquero occurs or the biosystematicsness happens or both if the ignoring rating does not occur. sent6: the biosystematicsness does not occur if the fact that either the pea-souper or the flicking square or both occurs is false. sent7: if the stearicness occurs then the fact that both the non-amenorrheicness and the non-blastogeneticness happens is not correct. sent8: if that the biosystematicsness does not occur and the varnishing vaquero does not occur is false then the offsideness does not occur. sent9: that the stearicness happens and the liberty occurs is brought about by that the varnishing passerine does not occur. sent10: if the fact that either the pea-souper or the flicking square or both happens is false then the biosystematicsness happens. sent11: the flicking square does not occur if the varnishing vaquero does not occur. sent12: that the cleaning happens and/or the varnishing Volapuk happens is not correct if the ignoring promiser does not occur. sent13: the ignoring ingot occurs. sent14: if that the ignoring rating happens is right then the fact that the biosystematicsness does not occur and the varnishing vaquero does not occur is false. sent15: the magnification does not occur. sent16: if the flicking Nansen occurs not the varnishing passerine but the goneness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the biosystematicsness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the varnishing vaquero does not occur is right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pea-souper occurs and/or the flicking square happens is not correct.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the biosystematicsness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the varnishing vaquero happens is true.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__