the urticating bitternut does not occur and the gale does not occur.
sent1: the grassiness does not occur. sent2: that either the blotting or the incriminating benefactor or both happens is brought about by the non-palatalness. sent3: if the insurrectionalness does not occur the urticating bitternut does not occur and the gale does not occur. sent4: the allopathy happens. sent5: the dwelling happens. sent6: the fact that the insurrectionalness and the auroralness happens is right if the spectacles does not occur. sent7: that the urticating bitternut does not occur and the gale does not occur is not true if the dwelling does not occur. sent8: if that that the spectacles happens and the blotting does not occur is right is not true the auroralness does not occur. sent9: the insurrectionalness does not occur if both the non-auroralness and the non-chromosomalness happens. sent10: the incriminating benefactor happens. sent11: the proceeding does not occur. sent12: that the trip and the lawfulness happens does not hold. sent13: the persistentness occurs. sent14: the fact that both the finerness and the incongruentness occurs is right. sent15: the residency happens. sent16: that the insurrectionalness does not occur prevents that the gale occurs. sent17: the chromosomalness is prevented by that the dwelling occurs and the persistentness occurs. sent18: if the incriminating benefactor happens then the fact that the spectacles happens and the blot does not occur is false. sent19: the preempting occurs and the IOP happens.
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: both the dwelling and the persistentness happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the chromosomalness does not occur.; sent18 & sent10 -> int3: that the spectacles but not the blot occurs is not right.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the auroralness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the auroralness does not occur and the chromosomalness does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the insurrectionalness does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the urticating bitternut does not occur and the gale does not occur is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the urticating bitternut does not occur and the gale does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the grassiness does not occur. sent2: that either the blotting or the incriminating benefactor or both happens is brought about by the non-palatalness. sent3: if the insurrectionalness does not occur the urticating bitternut does not occur and the gale does not occur. sent4: the allopathy happens. sent5: the dwelling happens. sent6: the fact that the insurrectionalness and the auroralness happens is right if the spectacles does not occur. sent7: that the urticating bitternut does not occur and the gale does not occur is not true if the dwelling does not occur. sent8: if that that the spectacles happens and the blotting does not occur is right is not true the auroralness does not occur. sent9: the insurrectionalness does not occur if both the non-auroralness and the non-chromosomalness happens. sent10: the incriminating benefactor happens. sent11: the proceeding does not occur. sent12: that the trip and the lawfulness happens does not hold. sent13: the persistentness occurs. sent14: the fact that both the finerness and the incongruentness occurs is right. sent15: the residency happens. sent16: that the insurrectionalness does not occur prevents that the gale occurs. sent17: the chromosomalness is prevented by that the dwelling occurs and the persistentness occurs. sent18: if the incriminating benefactor happens then the fact that the spectacles happens and the blot does not occur is false. sent19: the preempting occurs and the IOP happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent13 -> int1: both the dwelling and the persistentness happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the chromosomalness does not occur.; sent18 & sent10 -> int3: that the spectacles but not the blot occurs is not right.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the auroralness does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the auroralness does not occur and the chromosomalness does not occur.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the insurrectionalness does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__