the figurehead is a kind of a impenetrability but it does not concretize islay.
sent1: something is not synesthetic but it does lace shin if it does not concretize islay. sent2: if either the islay is acervate or it is a ratability or both the figurehead is acervate. sent3: if the galbulus does not lace shin and is acervate it is a ratability. sent4: if something is acervate it is a ratability. sent5: the galbulus does not lace shin if the figurehead is not synesthetic but it lace shin. sent6: the figurehead is a materialism that laces shin. sent7: the fact that something is a impenetrability that does not concretize islay is not right if it is a ratability. sent8: if something is not acervate then it is a impenetrability and does not concretize islay. sent9: if that the figurehead laces foreperson is not incorrect it does concretize alembic. sent10: the figurehead is acervate and it laces shin.
sent10 -> int1: the figurehead is acervate.; sent4 -> int2: if the figurehead is acervate then it is a ratability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the figurehead is a ratability.; sent7 -> int4: that the figurehead is a impenetrability but it does not concretize islay does not hold if it is a ratability.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the galbulus is a kind of a ratability.
sent1 -> int5: the figurehead is not synesthetic but it does lace shin if it does not concretize islay.;
$hypothesis$ = the figurehead is a kind of a impenetrability but it does not concretize islay. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not synesthetic but it does lace shin if it does not concretize islay. sent2: if either the islay is acervate or it is a ratability or both the figurehead is acervate. sent3: if the galbulus does not lace shin and is acervate it is a ratability. sent4: if something is acervate it is a ratability. sent5: the galbulus does not lace shin if the figurehead is not synesthetic but it lace shin. sent6: the figurehead is a materialism that laces shin. sent7: the fact that something is a impenetrability that does not concretize islay is not right if it is a ratability. sent8: if something is not acervate then it is a impenetrability and does not concretize islay. sent9: if that the figurehead laces foreperson is not incorrect it does concretize alembic. sent10: the figurehead is acervate and it laces shin. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the figurehead is acervate.; sent4 -> int2: if the figurehead is acervate then it is a ratability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the figurehead is a ratability.; sent7 -> int4: that the figurehead is a impenetrability but it does not concretize islay does not hold if it is a ratability.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__