the fact that the extremity does partake but it is not a mist is wrong.
sent1: the extremity is not acarpelous and/or it mists. sent2: something is not linear. sent3: the fact that something is a snapper is true. sent4: the extremity is not cadastral and/or it does partake if there exists something such that it is not cacodylic. sent5: the fact that the extremity does partake and is not a mist does not hold if something is not a kind of a snapper. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a rabbinate and it does tinkle alpha-adrenoceptor is not right. sent7: the Tamale is a wormwood if it is not a mist and/or is a wormwood. sent8: the bandoneon is a kind of a leeward if it either does not personify decontamination or is a kind of a leeward or both. sent9: if something does not jumble fur the extremity is not a kind of a mist or partakes or both. sent10: the saki is cadastral but it is non-Skinnerian. sent11: if something mists then the extremity partakes but it is not cadastral. sent12: something jumbles fur if it is not cadastral or does jumbles fur or both. sent13: something partakes if it is not cadastral or does partakes or both. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is a rabbinate and tinkles alpha-adrenoceptor is wrong the bandage does not jumble fur. sent15: if the bandage is non-cacodylic then it is not cadastral. sent16: the extremity is a chanfron. sent17: the extremity jumbles fur if there is something such that it is a comeliness. sent18: there exists something such that it is not cacodylic. sent19: the gunlock is cacodylic but it is not bibliophilic. sent20: the extremity jumbles fur. sent21: there exists something such that it does jumble fur. sent22: if something is a kind of a snapper the extremity does jumble fur and is not a mist. sent23: the fact that there exists something such that it does personify silkgrass is not wrong.
sent3 & sent22 -> int1: the extremity does jumble fur and does not mist.; int1 -> int2: the extremity is not a mist.; sent13 -> int3: if the extremity either is not cadastral or partakes or both it partakes.; sent18 & sent4 -> int4: the extremity is not cadastral or it does partake or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the extremity does partake.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the extremity does partake and is not a mist is wrong.
sent14 & sent6 -> int6: the bandage does not jumble fur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the extremity does partake but it is not a mist is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the extremity is not acarpelous and/or it mists. sent2: something is not linear. sent3: the fact that something is a snapper is true. sent4: the extremity is not cadastral and/or it does partake if there exists something such that it is not cacodylic. sent5: the fact that the extremity does partake and is not a mist does not hold if something is not a kind of a snapper. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a rabbinate and it does tinkle alpha-adrenoceptor is not right. sent7: the Tamale is a wormwood if it is not a mist and/or is a wormwood. sent8: the bandoneon is a kind of a leeward if it either does not personify decontamination or is a kind of a leeward or both. sent9: if something does not jumble fur the extremity is not a kind of a mist or partakes or both. sent10: the saki is cadastral but it is non-Skinnerian. sent11: if something mists then the extremity partakes but it is not cadastral. sent12: something jumbles fur if it is not cadastral or does jumbles fur or both. sent13: something partakes if it is not cadastral or does partakes or both. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is a rabbinate and tinkles alpha-adrenoceptor is wrong the bandage does not jumble fur. sent15: if the bandage is non-cacodylic then it is not cadastral. sent16: the extremity is a chanfron. sent17: the extremity jumbles fur if there is something such that it is a comeliness. sent18: there exists something such that it is not cacodylic. sent19: the gunlock is cacodylic but it is not bibliophilic. sent20: the extremity jumbles fur. sent21: there exists something such that it does jumble fur. sent22: if something is a kind of a snapper the extremity does jumble fur and is not a mist. sent23: the fact that there exists something such that it does personify silkgrass is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent22 -> int1: the extremity does jumble fur and does not mist.; int1 -> int2: the extremity is not a mist.; sent13 -> int3: if the extremity either is not cadastral or partakes or both it partakes.; sent18 & sent4 -> int4: the extremity is not cadastral or it does partake or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the extremity does partake.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__