the nutlet is not a Faraday.
sent1: the gum is not non-Norman but postmodernist if it is not a cellulose. sent2: if the nutlet does not tout brachydactyly then the Bunyaviridae does tout lucubration and it is a Myxocephalus. sent3: that the gum is a Myxocephalus or does not tout lucubration or both does not hold if something touts brachydactyly. sent4: the gum does not tout lucubration if that the nutlet is not a kind of a property and is a Faraday is wrong. sent5: there is something such that it touts brachydactyly. sent6: the gum sasses if that the snapper does not tout clonidine and/or it is a sasses does not hold. sent7: the nutlet does not tout brachydactyly if the fact that the gum is not Ionic but it tout brachydactyly is not true. sent8: that something is a kind of a sass and does not tout clonidine does not hold if it is Norman. sent9: the gum is not a kind of a Myxocephalus. sent10: something is not a Kandy but a birdcall if it is a Myxocephalus. sent11: that the snapper does not tout clonidine and/or it is a sass is not right if the church is a kind of a Norman. sent12: the nutlet is not a kind of a property. sent13: the gum does not tout lucubration if the nutlet is a kind of a property. sent14: the fact that something is not Ionic but it touts brachydactyly is not correct if it is not thermostatics. sent15: the fact that the nutlet is a property and it is a kind of a Faraday is not true. sent16: if there exists something such that it does tout brachydactyly then the gum is not a Myxocephalus. sent17: the gum is not a cellulose if the fact that it is a cellulose and it is not a kind of a Stoic does not hold. sent18: if the fact that something either does not tout lucubration or is not a Myxocephalus or both is not true then it is not a Faraday. sent19: that the gum is a cellulose but it is not a kind of a Stoic is not true. sent20: something is not thermostatics if that it is a kind of a sass and does not tout clonidine is wrong. sent21: the gum is Ionic but it is not thermostatics if it is a kind of a sass.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nutlet is not a property and is a Faraday does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the gum does not tout lucubration.; int1 -> int2: the gum is a Myxocephalus and/or it does not tout lucubration.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the gum is a Myxocephalus or does not tout lucubration or both is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the nutlet is not a kind of a property and is a Faraday.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the nutlet is not a kind of a Faraday.
sent18 -> int6: the nutlet is not a Faraday if that it does not tout lucubration and/or it is not a Myxocephalus is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the nutlet is not a Faraday. ; $context$ = sent1: the gum is not non-Norman but postmodernist if it is not a cellulose. sent2: if the nutlet does not tout brachydactyly then the Bunyaviridae does tout lucubration and it is a Myxocephalus. sent3: that the gum is a Myxocephalus or does not tout lucubration or both does not hold if something touts brachydactyly. sent4: the gum does not tout lucubration if that the nutlet is not a kind of a property and is a Faraday is wrong. sent5: there is something such that it touts brachydactyly. sent6: the gum sasses if that the snapper does not tout clonidine and/or it is a sasses does not hold. sent7: the nutlet does not tout brachydactyly if the fact that the gum is not Ionic but it tout brachydactyly is not true. sent8: that something is a kind of a sass and does not tout clonidine does not hold if it is Norman. sent9: the gum is not a kind of a Myxocephalus. sent10: something is not a Kandy but a birdcall if it is a Myxocephalus. sent11: that the snapper does not tout clonidine and/or it is a sass is not right if the church is a kind of a Norman. sent12: the nutlet is not a kind of a property. sent13: the gum does not tout lucubration if the nutlet is a kind of a property. sent14: the fact that something is not Ionic but it touts brachydactyly is not correct if it is not thermostatics. sent15: the fact that the nutlet is a property and it is a kind of a Faraday is not true. sent16: if there exists something such that it does tout brachydactyly then the gum is not a Myxocephalus. sent17: the gum is not a cellulose if the fact that it is a cellulose and it is not a kind of a Stoic does not hold. sent18: if the fact that something either does not tout lucubration or is not a Myxocephalus or both is not true then it is not a Faraday. sent19: that the gum is a cellulose but it is not a kind of a Stoic is not true. sent20: something is not thermostatics if that it is a kind of a sass and does not tout clonidine is wrong. sent21: the gum is Ionic but it is not thermostatics if it is a kind of a sass. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the nutlet is not a property and is a Faraday does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the gum does not tout lucubration.; int1 -> int2: the gum is a Myxocephalus and/or it does not tout lucubration.; sent5 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the gum is a Myxocephalus or does not tout lucubration or both is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the nutlet is not a kind of a property and is a Faraday.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__