the arcade is non-trapezoidal thing that is not a taste.
sent1: if the volumeter is not alchemic it is a hackberry and is a deist. sent2: if there exists something such that it does consolidate swat and it is a deist the funnel is not revocable. sent3: there exists something such that it does consolidate swat. sent4: the volumeter is not irrevocable. sent5: the fact that the volumeter is not alchemic hold if the poler is alchemic. sent6: something is revocable but it is not alchemic if it does consolidate swat. sent7: the reservist does not retire and is not a hackberry. sent8: if the chronograph is revocable the poler is alchemic. sent9: the chronograph is revocable. sent10: if something consolidates Mantell it consolidates swat and does not consolidate Palaquium. sent11: if there exists something such that it consolidates Palaquium and is not trapezoidal that the funnel is not revocable is true. sent12: that the keeshond is a deist is not wrong if it is not alchemic. sent13: there is something such that it tastes and it does not consolidate Mantell. sent14: the keeshond is not alchemic if the volumeter is revocable and/or it is alchemic. sent15: the keeshond is not a kind of a hackberry if something does consolidate swat and does not consolidate Palaquium. sent16: the arcade is not trapezoidal and it is not a taste if the fact that the funnel is not trapezoidal is not incorrect. sent17: the funnel is not non-trapezoidal if the fact that it does not consolidate Mantell is not false.
sent10 -> int1: the funnel consolidates swat but it does not consolidate Palaquium if it does consolidate Mantell.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the funnel consolidates Mantell.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the funnel does consolidate swat and does not consolidate Palaquium.; int2 -> int3: something does consolidate swat and does not consolidate Palaquium.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the keeshond is not a hackberry.; sent4 -> int5: the volumeter is revocable or it is alchemic or both.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the keeshond is not alchemic.;
that the fact that the arcade is not trapezoidal and it is not a taste is correct is incorrect.
sent8 & sent9 -> int7: the poler is alchemic.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the volumeter is not alchemic.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the volumeter is a hackberry that is a deist.; int9 -> int10: the volumeter is a hackberry.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a hackberry.;
$hypothesis$ = the arcade is non-trapezoidal thing that is not a taste. ; $context$ = sent1: if the volumeter is not alchemic it is a hackberry and is a deist. sent2: if there exists something such that it does consolidate swat and it is a deist the funnel is not revocable. sent3: there exists something such that it does consolidate swat. sent4: the volumeter is not irrevocable. sent5: the fact that the volumeter is not alchemic hold if the poler is alchemic. sent6: something is revocable but it is not alchemic if it does consolidate swat. sent7: the reservist does not retire and is not a hackberry. sent8: if the chronograph is revocable the poler is alchemic. sent9: the chronograph is revocable. sent10: if something consolidates Mantell it consolidates swat and does not consolidate Palaquium. sent11: if there exists something such that it consolidates Palaquium and is not trapezoidal that the funnel is not revocable is true. sent12: that the keeshond is a deist is not wrong if it is not alchemic. sent13: there is something such that it tastes and it does not consolidate Mantell. sent14: the keeshond is not alchemic if the volumeter is revocable and/or it is alchemic. sent15: the keeshond is not a kind of a hackberry if something does consolidate swat and does not consolidate Palaquium. sent16: the arcade is not trapezoidal and it is not a taste if the fact that the funnel is not trapezoidal is not incorrect. sent17: the funnel is not non-trapezoidal if the fact that it does not consolidate Mantell is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the funnel consolidates swat but it does not consolidate Palaquium if it does consolidate Mantell.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the funnel consolidates Mantell.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the funnel does consolidate swat and does not consolidate Palaquium.; int2 -> int3: something does consolidate swat and does not consolidate Palaquium.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the keeshond is not a hackberry.; sent4 -> int5: the volumeter is revocable or it is alchemic or both.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the keeshond is not alchemic.; __UNKNOWN__