the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Southerner and it is a devitalization is not correct then it is not inaccessible is right.
sent1: if that something is not a kind of a Southerner and is a devitalization is incorrect then it is inaccessible. sent2: if that the cocotte is a Southerner and is a devitalization is not correct then it is not inaccessible. sent3: something is not inaccessible if that it is not a Southerner and is a kind of a devitalization is not correct. sent4: something does not emblazon carry-over if it does not revenge tabbouleh.
sent3 -> int1: the cocotte is not inaccessible if that it is not a Southerner and is a kind of a devitalization does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Southerner and it is a devitalization is not correct then it is not inaccessible is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a kind of a Southerner and is a devitalization is incorrect then it is inaccessible. sent2: if that the cocotte is a Southerner and is a devitalization is not correct then it is not inaccessible. sent3: something is not inaccessible if that it is not a Southerner and is a kind of a devitalization is not correct. sent4: something does not emblazon carry-over if it does not revenge tabbouleh. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the cocotte is not inaccessible if that it is not a Southerner and is a kind of a devitalization does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__