the schrod collects seance.
sent1: the schrod is a valentine. sent2: the brill is not acervate if the inhabitant is acervate and/or not a war. sent3: if something that is not a sericulturist is a kind of a Granth then the fact that the warbler does not war is correct. sent4: the tampion is not malicious and is an affirmative. sent5: the ogler does not furrow if the tampion is not malicious but affirmative. sent6: the ultraviolet does flabbergast Spartium if the pyrrhotite is a valentine. sent7: the schrod does not collect seance if the tampion does furrow and is not a monotony. sent8: The sellout does not flabbergast schrod. sent9: if there is something such that that it flabbergasts sellout and it is a glomerule is wrong the ogler is not a glomerule. sent10: if the fact that the schrod is a furrowed but it is not a monotony does not hold the ogler does flabbergast sellout. sent11: if the schrod is a monotony that does not flabbergast sellout then it flabbergasts Spartium. sent12: if there exists something such that it flabbergasts Spartium then that the triton does flabbergast sellout and is a kind of a glomerule does not hold. sent13: that that the triton is a glomerule but it is not a kind of a furrowed does not hold is not incorrect if the ogler is not a kind of a furrowed. sent14: the pyrrhotite is a kind of a valentine if there exists something such that the fact that it launches narrow-mindedness and/or it is a kind of a Monet does not hold. sent15: the inhabitant is acervate and/or it is not a kind of a war if there is something such that it is not a kind of a war. sent16: the fact that the triton is a glomerule and it furrows is wrong. sent17: the schrod does not flabbergast sellout. sent18: if that the schrod does not collect seance but it is a furrowed hold then the fact that the triton is not malicious is correct. sent19: something is not a kind of a sericulturist but it is a Granth. sent20: the fact that the schrod does collect seance is not wrong if it is not a Monet. sent21: the schrod is a monotony if the fact that the triton is a kind of a glomerule and does not furrow is incorrect. sent22: if the brill is not acervate then the fact that the galago launches narrow-mindedness and/or is a Monet is not correct.
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the ogler does not furrow.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the triton is a kind of a glomerule that is not a furrowed is not right.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the schrod is a kind of a monotony.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the schrod is a monotony that does not flabbergast sellout.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the schrod flabbergasts Spartium.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the schrod does flabbergast Spartium and it is a valentine.;
that the schrod does not collect seance is not false.
sent19 & sent3 -> int7: the warbler does not war.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it does not war.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: the inhabitant is acervate or not a war or both.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the brill is not acervate.; sent22 & int10 -> int11: that either the galago does launch narrow-mindedness or it is a Monet or both is incorrect.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it launches narrow-mindedness and/or it is a Monet does not hold.; int12 & sent14 -> int13: the pyrrhotite is a kind of a valentine.; sent6 & int13 -> int14: the ultraviolet does flabbergast Spartium.; int14 -> int15: something does flabbergast Spartium.; int15 & sent12 -> int16: the fact that the triton does flabbergast sellout and it is a glomerule is not right.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that the fact that it flabbergasts sellout and it is a glomerule is incorrect.; int17 & sent9 -> int18: the ogler is not a glomerule.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that it is not a glomerule.;
$hypothesis$ = the schrod collects seance. ; $context$ = sent1: the schrod is a valentine. sent2: the brill is not acervate if the inhabitant is acervate and/or not a war. sent3: if something that is not a sericulturist is a kind of a Granth then the fact that the warbler does not war is correct. sent4: the tampion is not malicious and is an affirmative. sent5: the ogler does not furrow if the tampion is not malicious but affirmative. sent6: the ultraviolet does flabbergast Spartium if the pyrrhotite is a valentine. sent7: the schrod does not collect seance if the tampion does furrow and is not a monotony. sent8: The sellout does not flabbergast schrod. sent9: if there is something such that that it flabbergasts sellout and it is a glomerule is wrong the ogler is not a glomerule. sent10: if the fact that the schrod is a furrowed but it is not a monotony does not hold the ogler does flabbergast sellout. sent11: if the schrod is a monotony that does not flabbergast sellout then it flabbergasts Spartium. sent12: if there exists something such that it flabbergasts Spartium then that the triton does flabbergast sellout and is a kind of a glomerule does not hold. sent13: that that the triton is a glomerule but it is not a kind of a furrowed does not hold is not incorrect if the ogler is not a kind of a furrowed. sent14: the pyrrhotite is a kind of a valentine if there exists something such that the fact that it launches narrow-mindedness and/or it is a kind of a Monet does not hold. sent15: the inhabitant is acervate and/or it is not a kind of a war if there is something such that it is not a kind of a war. sent16: the fact that the triton is a glomerule and it furrows is wrong. sent17: the schrod does not flabbergast sellout. sent18: if that the schrod does not collect seance but it is a furrowed hold then the fact that the triton is not malicious is correct. sent19: something is not a kind of a sericulturist but it is a Granth. sent20: the fact that the schrod does collect seance is not wrong if it is not a Monet. sent21: the schrod is a monotony if the fact that the triton is a kind of a glomerule and does not furrow is incorrect. sent22: if the brill is not acervate then the fact that the galago launches narrow-mindedness and/or is a Monet is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the ogler does not furrow.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the triton is a kind of a glomerule that is not a furrowed is not right.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the schrod is a kind of a monotony.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the schrod is a monotony that does not flabbergast sellout.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the schrod flabbergasts Spartium.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the schrod does flabbergast Spartium and it is a valentine.; __UNKNOWN__