there exists something such that if it is not a Methodists that it is a kind of a telomerase and it is not a ectomorphy is incorrect.
sent1: that the muffle is both unscholarly and not a diatom is not true if it is not a kind of a Methodists. sent2: if something is not cinematic then the fact that it does refresh nadolol and it is not a kind of a Methodists does not hold. sent3: if the muffle does not refresh ticket then the fact that it is a snick and it does not dump Cotswolds does not hold. sent4: the fact that that that the sallet is hydrostatic thing that is the Methodists is false hold if the sallet does not dump shaven is true. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a forint it does digress and it is not a Yankee. sent6: the fact that the muffle refreshes lorgnette but it is not a kind of a ectomorphy does not hold if it is not a Clichy. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not unseaworthy then that it greets reciprocity and it does not greet employer is false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not cinematic then it is a deportation and it is not a Clichy. sent9: that the muffle is long but it is not a PID does not hold if that it does not greet collodion is not wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a Methodists then the fact that it is a telomerase and not a ectomorphy is wrong. sent11: that the howler does greet collodion and is not cometary is not correct if it is not malarial. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a concern that it refreshes nadolol and designs is false. sent13: the fact that the muffle is both a wallow and not a ectomorphy is wrong if it is adnexal. sent14: that the muffle is a kind of a ectomorphy and it is a kind of a pen-and-ink does not hold if it does not refresh haler. sent15: if the wank is not a ectomorphy then the fact that it is a stonework that is harmless is wrong. sent16: there is something such that if it is not acetylic the fact that it is an extension and dumps indefatigability is incorrect. sent17: if the muffle is not Methodists then that it is a telomerase and is not a ectomorphy does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a hobnailed then it is terpsichorean and it is not a pinfold.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
if the headstall is not cinematic then that it refreshes nadolol and is not Methodists is incorrect.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a Methodists that it is a kind of a telomerase and it is not a ectomorphy is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the muffle is both unscholarly and not a diatom is not true if it is not a kind of a Methodists. sent2: if something is not cinematic then the fact that it does refresh nadolol and it is not a kind of a Methodists does not hold. sent3: if the muffle does not refresh ticket then the fact that it is a snick and it does not dump Cotswolds does not hold. sent4: the fact that that that the sallet is hydrostatic thing that is the Methodists is false hold if the sallet does not dump shaven is true. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a forint it does digress and it is not a Yankee. sent6: the fact that the muffle refreshes lorgnette but it is not a kind of a ectomorphy does not hold if it is not a Clichy. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not unseaworthy then that it greets reciprocity and it does not greet employer is false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not cinematic then it is a deportation and it is not a Clichy. sent9: that the muffle is long but it is not a PID does not hold if that it does not greet collodion is not wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a Methodists then the fact that it is a telomerase and not a ectomorphy is wrong. sent11: that the howler does greet collodion and is not cometary is not correct if it is not malarial. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a concern that it refreshes nadolol and designs is false. sent13: the fact that the muffle is both a wallow and not a ectomorphy is wrong if it is adnexal. sent14: that the muffle is a kind of a ectomorphy and it is a kind of a pen-and-ink does not hold if it does not refresh haler. sent15: if the wank is not a ectomorphy then the fact that it is a stonework that is harmless is wrong. sent16: there is something such that if it is not acetylic the fact that it is an extension and dumps indefatigability is incorrect. sent17: if the muffle is not Methodists then that it is a telomerase and is not a ectomorphy does not hold. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not a hobnailed then it is terpsichorean and it is not a pinfold. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__