the jujutsu does not occur.
sent1: the inharmoniousness happens. sent2: if the eagerness occurs then the inharmoniousness and the non-wieldiness occurs. sent3: if the cognitiveness does not occur and the venesection happens then the monetizing glove does not occur. sent4: if the straddling does not occur the non-affirmativeness and the quietness happens. sent5: that the commonsness occurs prevents the unwieldyness. sent6: if the fact that the whiffing monosyllable does not occur and the designing delegate occurs is wrong the commonsness occurs. sent7: that the flexibleness does not occur is triggered by that not the whiffing monosyllable but the designing delegate happens. sent8: the monetizing ayin occurs and the eagerness occurs if the affirmativeness does not occur. sent9: that the wieldiness and the inharmoniousness occurs causes that the jujutsu does not occur. sent10: the flexibleness occurs. sent11: if the designing delegate does not occur then the commonsness occurs. sent12: the self happens. sent13: the fact that the poll happens hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whiffing monosyllable does not occur but the designing delegate happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the flexibleness does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the whiffing monosyllable but the designing delegate occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the commonsness happens.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the wieldiness happens.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the wieldiness and the inharmoniousness happens.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the jujutsu happens.
$hypothesis$ = the jujutsu does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the inharmoniousness happens. sent2: if the eagerness occurs then the inharmoniousness and the non-wieldiness occurs. sent3: if the cognitiveness does not occur and the venesection happens then the monetizing glove does not occur. sent4: if the straddling does not occur the non-affirmativeness and the quietness happens. sent5: that the commonsness occurs prevents the unwieldyness. sent6: if the fact that the whiffing monosyllable does not occur and the designing delegate occurs is wrong the commonsness occurs. sent7: that the flexibleness does not occur is triggered by that not the whiffing monosyllable but the designing delegate happens. sent8: the monetizing ayin occurs and the eagerness occurs if the affirmativeness does not occur. sent9: that the wieldiness and the inharmoniousness occurs causes that the jujutsu does not occur. sent10: the flexibleness occurs. sent11: if the designing delegate does not occur then the commonsness occurs. sent12: the self happens. sent13: the fact that the poll happens hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whiffing monosyllable does not occur but the designing delegate happens.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the flexibleness does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the whiffing monosyllable but the designing delegate occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the commonsness happens.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the wieldiness happens.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the wieldiness and the inharmoniousness happens.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__