the Walloon does not skitter.
sent1: if the fact that the Cotswolds is not a fluvastatin and does not skitter is not right then the Walloon does not intimate. sent2: if the Cotswolds is not a kind of a fluvastatin or intimates or both then it does skitter. sent3: the Atrovent does not ignore rockslide and it does not moralize. sent4: the bubbler skitters. sent5: the Cotswolds intimates. sent6: that that the Cotswolds does not ignore Atrovent and does not intimate does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the scribe is not an ideal but it is a fluvastatin is not correct. sent8: the Cotswolds is not a fluvastatin if the fact that the Walloon is non-ideal thing that does not intimate is not correct. sent9: the Walloon is not a wimp and does not flick collect. sent10: that the Cotswolds flicks collect and does not intimate is incorrect. sent11: the Cotswolds is not ideal. sent12: the Walloon does assimilate. sent13: the Walloon does not flick collect or it skitters or both. sent14: the Walloon is a fluvastatin or it is a kind of an ideal or both. sent15: the Cotswolds does not flick collect. sent16: the Walloon does moralize. sent17: something that is not a kind of a fluvastatin and/or is a kind of an ideal does skitter. sent18: the Cotswolds either does not flick collect or does skitter or both. sent19: if the fact that the Cotswolds does not flick collect and it does not intimate is false the Walloon is not a kind of a fluvastatin. sent20: if the fact that the Cotswolds does flick collect is true the Walloon is not a kind of a fluvastatin. sent21: if that the Cotswolds does not skitter and is not ideal is incorrect that the Walloon does not intimate is not incorrect. sent22: the Walloon does not intimate. sent23: the fact that the Cotswolds does not flick collect and is not a deliveryman is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cotswolds does not flick collect and it does not intimate.; assump1 -> int1: the Cotswolds does not intimate.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Cotswolds does not flick collect and does not intimate is not right.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the Walloon is not a fluvastatin.; int4 -> int5: either the Walloon is not a kind of a fluvastatin or it is an ideal or both.; sent17 -> int6: if the Walloon is not a fluvastatin or is ideal or both it skitters.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the Walloon does not skitter.
$hypothesis$ = the Walloon does not skitter. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Cotswolds is not a fluvastatin and does not skitter is not right then the Walloon does not intimate. sent2: if the Cotswolds is not a kind of a fluvastatin or intimates or both then it does skitter. sent3: the Atrovent does not ignore rockslide and it does not moralize. sent4: the bubbler skitters. sent5: the Cotswolds intimates. sent6: that that the Cotswolds does not ignore Atrovent and does not intimate does not hold is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the scribe is not an ideal but it is a fluvastatin is not correct. sent8: the Cotswolds is not a fluvastatin if the fact that the Walloon is non-ideal thing that does not intimate is not correct. sent9: the Walloon is not a wimp and does not flick collect. sent10: that the Cotswolds flicks collect and does not intimate is incorrect. sent11: the Cotswolds is not ideal. sent12: the Walloon does assimilate. sent13: the Walloon does not flick collect or it skitters or both. sent14: the Walloon is a fluvastatin or it is a kind of an ideal or both. sent15: the Cotswolds does not flick collect. sent16: the Walloon does moralize. sent17: something that is not a kind of a fluvastatin and/or is a kind of an ideal does skitter. sent18: the Cotswolds either does not flick collect or does skitter or both. sent19: if the fact that the Cotswolds does not flick collect and it does not intimate is false the Walloon is not a kind of a fluvastatin. sent20: if the fact that the Cotswolds does flick collect is true the Walloon is not a kind of a fluvastatin. sent21: if that the Cotswolds does not skitter and is not ideal is incorrect that the Walloon does not intimate is not incorrect. sent22: the Walloon does not intimate. sent23: the fact that the Cotswolds does not flick collect and is not a deliveryman is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cotswolds does not flick collect and it does not intimate.; assump1 -> int1: the Cotswolds does not intimate.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Cotswolds does not flick collect and does not intimate is not right.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the Walloon is not a fluvastatin.; int4 -> int5: either the Walloon is not a kind of a fluvastatin or it is an ideal or both.; sent17 -> int6: if the Walloon is not a fluvastatin or is ideal or both it skitters.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__