the pier is anaphylactic.
sent1: that the missus is not falconine but it is anaphylactic is wrong if the pier does not malinger Kashmir. sent2: the roundsman is falconine if that the fact that the missus is not a kind of a dash and is falconine is not incorrect is not correct. sent3: if the fact that the procurator is not a cannikin and does counterplot Shiism is not right the pier is anaphylactic. sent4: the bilirubin counterplots Shiism. sent5: if that the missus is not falconine is not wrong the fact that the roundsman is falconine is true. sent6: the seeder does malinger Kashmir or it is a kind of a cannikin or both. sent7: that that the seeder does dash and it does counterplot Perry is false is true if the missus is not falconine. sent8: if the fact that the seeder is anaphylactic is right then the pier does not malinger Kashmir. sent9: that the fact that the missus is not a dash but anaphylactic hold does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the seeder does not malinger Kashmir is not wrong that the procurator is not a cannikin but it counterplots Shiism is wrong. sent11: if the fact that something does not counterplot Perry and does malinger Kashmir is not right then it is not anaphylactic. sent12: the seeder is not falconine. sent13: the missus counterplots Perry if the seeder does dash. sent14: if the seeder either does counterplot Perry or malingers Kashmir or both the roundsman is not falconine. sent15: that the procurator is not falconine but it is a cannikin is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seeder does malinger Kashmir.; assump1 -> int1: the seeder counterplots Perry or does malinger Kashmir or both.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the roundsman is not falconine.;
the pier is not anaphylactic.
sent11 -> int3: if the fact that the pier does not counterplot Perry but it does malinger Kashmir is not correct it is not anaphylactic.;
$hypothesis$ = the pier is anaphylactic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the missus is not falconine but it is anaphylactic is wrong if the pier does not malinger Kashmir. sent2: the roundsman is falconine if that the fact that the missus is not a kind of a dash and is falconine is not incorrect is not correct. sent3: if the fact that the procurator is not a cannikin and does counterplot Shiism is not right the pier is anaphylactic. sent4: the bilirubin counterplots Shiism. sent5: if that the missus is not falconine is not wrong the fact that the roundsman is falconine is true. sent6: the seeder does malinger Kashmir or it is a kind of a cannikin or both. sent7: that that the seeder does dash and it does counterplot Perry is false is true if the missus is not falconine. sent8: if the fact that the seeder is anaphylactic is right then the pier does not malinger Kashmir. sent9: that the fact that the missus is not a dash but anaphylactic hold does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the seeder does not malinger Kashmir is not wrong that the procurator is not a cannikin but it counterplots Shiism is wrong. sent11: if the fact that something does not counterplot Perry and does malinger Kashmir is not right then it is not anaphylactic. sent12: the seeder is not falconine. sent13: the missus counterplots Perry if the seeder does dash. sent14: if the seeder either does counterplot Perry or malingers Kashmir or both the roundsman is not falconine. sent15: that the procurator is not falconine but it is a cannikin is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seeder does malinger Kashmir.; assump1 -> int1: the seeder counterplots Perry or does malinger Kashmir or both.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the roundsman is not falconine.; __UNKNOWN__