that there is something such that if that it is not a gloom but a storehouse is not right then it is convergent is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not corporate but guttural is incorrect it is uneager. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a gloom it is convergent. sent3: if something that is not a gloom is a storehouse it is convergent. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a gloom and it is a storehouse is not right then the fact that it is not non-convergent is correct. sent5: if the soporific is not a gloom but a storehouse then it is convergent. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that that it is not a kind of a Colchicum and is a latrine is not incorrect is not right it is a Tobit. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a gloom and is a storehouse then it is convergent. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a storehouse it is convergent. sent9: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a rates and it is an alkalinity is false then it does trice eolith. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a completeness and it trices Palaemonidae is not correct it trices Zu. sent11: if the fact that the bascule is not unpleasant and is a kind of a disgruntlement is not true then it does hew. sent12: if the soporific is a gloom then it is convergent. sent13: if that something is both not a greenshank and caruncular is incorrect it is a ragpicker. sent14: if the fact that something is not a gloom and is a storehouse does not hold then it is convergent. sent15: if that something is not a journey and is branchless is not correct it is a Copley.
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the soporific is not a kind of a gloom but it is a storehouse is not correct it is convergent.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it is not a gloom but a storehouse is not right then it is convergent is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not corporate but guttural is incorrect it is uneager. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a gloom it is convergent. sent3: if something that is not a gloom is a storehouse it is convergent. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a gloom and it is a storehouse is not right then the fact that it is not non-convergent is correct. sent5: if the soporific is not a gloom but a storehouse then it is convergent. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that that it is not a kind of a Colchicum and is a latrine is not incorrect is not right it is a Tobit. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a gloom and is a storehouse then it is convergent. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a storehouse it is convergent. sent9: there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a rates and it is an alkalinity is false then it does trice eolith. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a completeness and it trices Palaemonidae is not correct it trices Zu. sent11: if the fact that the bascule is not unpleasant and is a kind of a disgruntlement is not true then it does hew. sent12: if the soporific is a gloom then it is convergent. sent13: if that something is both not a greenshank and caruncular is incorrect it is a ragpicker. sent14: if the fact that something is not a gloom and is a storehouse does not hold then it is convergent. sent15: if that something is not a journey and is branchless is not correct it is a Copley. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if the fact that the soporific is not a kind of a gloom but it is a storehouse is not correct it is convergent.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__