that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and the plume does not occur does not hold.
sent1: both the sacking and the private happens if the syntacticness does not occur. sent2: the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and/or the ruff occurs if the suffocation does not occur. sent3: the syntacticness does not occur. sent4: the suffocation happens. sent5: the fact that both the syncreticness and the non-Slavness occurs is wrong if the sit-up does not occur. sent6: that the conformation does not occur and the shipping does not occur does not hold. sent7: the fact that not the posting rescued but the frightening oarswoman occurs is not true if the jetting does not occur. sent8: that the hop-step-and-jump but not the pluming occurs is wrong. sent9: the dolomiticness does not occur if the junket occurs and the casuisticness occurs. sent10: the fact that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and the pluming happens does not hold if the ruff does not occur. sent11: if the managerialness does not occur the ravening and the noshing occurs. sent12: the sacking happens. sent13: the adiabaticness does not occur. sent14: if the syntacticness does not occur then the sacking happens. sent15: both the unawaresness and the Vedicness occurs if that the thinking Kursk happens is false. sent16: if the fact that the ruff does not occur hold that the fact that the hop-step-and-jump occurs but the plume does not occur is wrong is not wrong. sent17: if either the hop-step-and-jump does not occur or the ruff occurs or both then the hop-step-and-jump does not occur. sent18: that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and the pluming does not occur is wrong if the fact that the ruff does not occur is correct. sent19: if the Slavness happens then the posting sowbane occurs and/or the syntacticness does not occur. sent20: that not the hop-step-and-jump but the pluming happens is incorrect. sent21: that the thinking Amphisbaena and the feathering occurs is triggered by that the posting rescued does not occur. sent22: if the feather does not occur then that the heterosexism does not occur and the posting slavery does not occur does not hold. sent23: the fact that the Slavness happens is not false. sent24: if both the ruff and the suffocation happens then the private does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ruff happens.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the ruff occurs and the suffocation occurs.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the private does not occur.; sent1 & sent3 -> int3: the sacking happens and the privateness happens.; int3 -> int4: the private occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the ruff does not occur is not false.; int6 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and the pluming does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and the plume does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: both the sacking and the private happens if the syntacticness does not occur. sent2: the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and/or the ruff occurs if the suffocation does not occur. sent3: the syntacticness does not occur. sent4: the suffocation happens. sent5: the fact that both the syncreticness and the non-Slavness occurs is wrong if the sit-up does not occur. sent6: that the conformation does not occur and the shipping does not occur does not hold. sent7: the fact that not the posting rescued but the frightening oarswoman occurs is not true if the jetting does not occur. sent8: that the hop-step-and-jump but not the pluming occurs is wrong. sent9: the dolomiticness does not occur if the junket occurs and the casuisticness occurs. sent10: the fact that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and the pluming happens does not hold if the ruff does not occur. sent11: if the managerialness does not occur the ravening and the noshing occurs. sent12: the sacking happens. sent13: the adiabaticness does not occur. sent14: if the syntacticness does not occur then the sacking happens. sent15: both the unawaresness and the Vedicness occurs if that the thinking Kursk happens is false. sent16: if the fact that the ruff does not occur hold that the fact that the hop-step-and-jump occurs but the plume does not occur is wrong is not wrong. sent17: if either the hop-step-and-jump does not occur or the ruff occurs or both then the hop-step-and-jump does not occur. sent18: that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and the pluming does not occur is wrong if the fact that the ruff does not occur is correct. sent19: if the Slavness happens then the posting sowbane occurs and/or the syntacticness does not occur. sent20: that not the hop-step-and-jump but the pluming happens is incorrect. sent21: that the thinking Amphisbaena and the feathering occurs is triggered by that the posting rescued does not occur. sent22: if the feather does not occur then that the heterosexism does not occur and the posting slavery does not occur does not hold. sent23: the fact that the Slavness happens is not false. sent24: if both the ruff and the suffocation happens then the private does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ruff happens.; assump1 & sent4 -> int1: the ruff occurs and the suffocation occurs.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: the private does not occur.; sent1 & sent3 -> int3: the sacking happens and the privateness happens.; int3 -> int4: the private occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the ruff does not occur is not false.; int6 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__