the uncurling does not occur.
sent1: that both the receiving automatism and the sarcolemmicness occurs is caused by that the seeking obolus does not occur. sent2: that the seeking obolus happens is prevented by the receiving Messiah. sent3: that the middle-classness happens results in that the discouragement happens. sent4: if that the seeking souse but not the monsoon occurs is false the middle-classness happens. sent5: the sarcolemmicness does not occur. sent6: if the caucusing does not occur the porphyriticness happens and the receiving Messiah occurs. sent7: the alarmism happens. sent8: the uncurling occurs if the discouragement occurs. sent9: if the fact that the hobby does not occur and the monolatry does not occur is incorrect then the caucusing does not occur. sent10: if the jackstraws occurs and the monsoon happens then the uncurling does not occur. sent11: the fact that the Madagascan does not occur and the meeting Samoa occurs is correct if the jackstraws occurs. sent12: that the seeking rustiness but not the offingness occurs is false. sent13: that the feminism happens and the alarmism happens does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the monolatry happens and the cycling does not occur is not true the miniaturization occurs. sent15: that the seeking souse but not the monsoon occurs is wrong if that the jackstraws does not occur is not wrong. sent16: if the seeking souse does not occur the jackstraws occurs and the monsoon occurs. sent17: the seeking shitwork happens. sent18: the unconquerableness occurs and the nosing solitude occurs if the hardness does not occur. sent19: if the sarcolemmicness does not occur the receiving automatism and the Madagascan occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jackstraws happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the non-Madagascanness and the meeting Samoa occurs.; int1 -> int2: the Madagascan does not occur.; sent19 & sent5 -> int3: the receiving automatism occurs and the Madagascan occurs.; int3 -> int4: the Madagascan occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the jackstraws does not occur.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: that the seeking souse happens and the monsoon does not occur is incorrect.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the middle-classness occurs.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the discouragement happens.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the uncurling does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the uncurling does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the receiving automatism and the sarcolemmicness occurs is caused by that the seeking obolus does not occur. sent2: that the seeking obolus happens is prevented by the receiving Messiah. sent3: that the middle-classness happens results in that the discouragement happens. sent4: if that the seeking souse but not the monsoon occurs is false the middle-classness happens. sent5: the sarcolemmicness does not occur. sent6: if the caucusing does not occur the porphyriticness happens and the receiving Messiah occurs. sent7: the alarmism happens. sent8: the uncurling occurs if the discouragement occurs. sent9: if the fact that the hobby does not occur and the monolatry does not occur is incorrect then the caucusing does not occur. sent10: if the jackstraws occurs and the monsoon happens then the uncurling does not occur. sent11: the fact that the Madagascan does not occur and the meeting Samoa occurs is correct if the jackstraws occurs. sent12: that the seeking rustiness but not the offingness occurs is false. sent13: that the feminism happens and the alarmism happens does not hold. sent14: if the fact that the monolatry happens and the cycling does not occur is not true the miniaturization occurs. sent15: that the seeking souse but not the monsoon occurs is wrong if that the jackstraws does not occur is not wrong. sent16: if the seeking souse does not occur the jackstraws occurs and the monsoon occurs. sent17: the seeking shitwork happens. sent18: the unconquerableness occurs and the nosing solitude occurs if the hardness does not occur. sent19: if the sarcolemmicness does not occur the receiving automatism and the Madagascan occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jackstraws happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the non-Madagascanness and the meeting Samoa occurs.; int1 -> int2: the Madagascan does not occur.; sent19 & sent5 -> int3: the receiving automatism occurs and the Madagascan occurs.; int3 -> int4: the Madagascan occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the jackstraws does not occur.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: that the seeking souse happens and the monsoon does not occur is incorrect.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the middle-classness occurs.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the discouragement happens.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__