that the fluorescent does crook poem and ammoniates baa-lamb does not hold.
sent1: if something does not amaze or is a wangle or both then it is a wangle. sent2: the rheumatic is a Mormons and does not ammoniate lunchroom if the assimilation is not a kind of a Mormons. sent3: The baa-lamb ammoniates pottage. sent4: something that is a Mormons does not amaze and/or wangles. sent5: the pottage ammoniates baa-lamb. sent6: the ottoman does not extend. sent7: if the ottoman does not extend then it ammoniates draftsman and it is a chondrule. sent8: if that the pottage does ammoniate baa-lamb is right the fact that the fluorescent ammoniate baa-lamb hold. sent9: if the rheumatic is Mormons but it does not ammoniate lunchroom the fluorescent clanks Callirhoe. sent10: if the ottoman is a chondrule then the pottage is a kind of a chondrule. sent11: that the crimp does not amaze is right. sent12: the assimilation is non-Mormons if that the crimp does wangle and it does clank kowhai is not true. sent13: if the crimp does not amaze then that it is a wangle and it does clank kowhai does not hold. sent14: the assimilation crooks poem if there is something such that the fact that it is not offstage and does ammoniate baa-lamb is not right. sent15: something is lysogenic if it does clank Callirhoe. sent16: something is lysogenic but it does not ammoniate lunchroom if it crooks poem. sent17: if the pottage is a chondrule then the fact that the fluorescent is not offstage and does ammoniate baa-lamb is not true. sent18: the rheumatic is not non-Mormons if the crimp is non-Mormons. sent19: that if the assimilation does not ammoniate lunchroom then the crimp is Mormons and/or it does clank Callirhoe is not false. sent20: something does crook poem if it is lysogenic.
sent13 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the crimp is a wangle and it clanks kowhai does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the assimilation is not a Mormons.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the rheumatic is a Mormons that does not ammoniate lunchroom.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: that the fluorescent does clank Callirhoe is not wrong.; sent15 -> int5: if the fluorescent does clank Callirhoe it is lysogenic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fluorescent is lysogenic.; sent20 -> int7: the fluorescent does crook poem if it is lysogenic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fluorescent does crook poem.; sent8 & sent5 -> int9: the fluorescent does ammoniate baa-lamb.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the rheumatic is a wangle.
sent1 -> int10: the rheumatic wangles if it does not amaze and/or it does wangles.; sent4 -> int11: the rheumatic does not amaze or it does wangle or both if it is a kind of a Mormons.; sent16 -> int12: if the assimilation crooks poem then it is lysogenic and it does not ammoniate lunchroom.; sent7 & sent6 -> int13: the ottoman does ammoniate draftsman and it is a kind of a chondrule.; int13 -> int14: the ottoman is a kind of a chondrule.; sent10 & int14 -> int15: the pottage is a chondrule.; sent17 & int15 -> int16: that the fluorescent is non-offstage thing that ammoniates baa-lamb is not right.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-offstage thing that ammoniates baa-lamb is not true.; int17 & sent14 -> int18: the assimilation does crook poem.; int12 & int18 -> int19: the assimilation is lysogenic thing that does not ammoniate lunchroom.; int19 -> int20: the assimilation does not ammoniate lunchroom.; sent19 & int20 -> int21: the crimp is a Mormons and/or clanks Callirhoe.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fluorescent does crook poem and ammoniates baa-lamb does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not amaze or is a wangle or both then it is a wangle. sent2: the rheumatic is a Mormons and does not ammoniate lunchroom if the assimilation is not a kind of a Mormons. sent3: The baa-lamb ammoniates pottage. sent4: something that is a Mormons does not amaze and/or wangles. sent5: the pottage ammoniates baa-lamb. sent6: the ottoman does not extend. sent7: if the ottoman does not extend then it ammoniates draftsman and it is a chondrule. sent8: if that the pottage does ammoniate baa-lamb is right the fact that the fluorescent ammoniate baa-lamb hold. sent9: if the rheumatic is Mormons but it does not ammoniate lunchroom the fluorescent clanks Callirhoe. sent10: if the ottoman is a chondrule then the pottage is a kind of a chondrule. sent11: that the crimp does not amaze is right. sent12: the assimilation is non-Mormons if that the crimp does wangle and it does clank kowhai is not true. sent13: if the crimp does not amaze then that it is a wangle and it does clank kowhai does not hold. sent14: the assimilation crooks poem if there is something such that the fact that it is not offstage and does ammoniate baa-lamb is not right. sent15: something is lysogenic if it does clank Callirhoe. sent16: something is lysogenic but it does not ammoniate lunchroom if it crooks poem. sent17: if the pottage is a chondrule then the fact that the fluorescent is not offstage and does ammoniate baa-lamb is not true. sent18: the rheumatic is not non-Mormons if the crimp is non-Mormons. sent19: that if the assimilation does not ammoniate lunchroom then the crimp is Mormons and/or it does clank Callirhoe is not false. sent20: something does crook poem if it is lysogenic. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the crimp is a wangle and it clanks kowhai does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the assimilation is not a Mormons.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the rheumatic is a Mormons that does not ammoniate lunchroom.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: that the fluorescent does clank Callirhoe is not wrong.; sent15 -> int5: if the fluorescent does clank Callirhoe it is lysogenic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fluorescent is lysogenic.; sent20 -> int7: the fluorescent does crook poem if it is lysogenic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fluorescent does crook poem.; sent8 & sent5 -> int9: the fluorescent does ammoniate baa-lamb.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__