the cookhouse piddles whalebone.
sent1: the darkroom is not a scribble if the fact that either the nonsteroid is not a L-dopa or it is not a scribble or both hold. sent2: if the cookhouse is a ecobabble that it is a kind of armillary thing that does not mystify sprechgesang is not correct. sent3: the darkroom is not a kind of a ecobabble and it is not a boyhood. sent4: if the fact that something is a kind of a pop is true then it is not a L-dopa and/or is not a scribble. sent5: the darkroom is not a protamine and is not a boyhood. sent6: if the nonsteroid is not a kind of a L-dopa then the pickerel is both a scribble and not a pop. sent7: something is non-informational if it mystifies sprechgesang. sent8: the nonsteroid does pop and bowls if it is not informational. sent9: if the darkroom is not a protamine but a boyhood then the nonsteroid is not a L-dopa. sent10: the cookhouse is not loose and it is not a consumptive. sent11: the nonsteroid is not a scribble. sent12: something is non-informational if the fact that it is armillary and it does not mystify sprechgesang is incorrect. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a pop. sent14: if something is both not a bowls and non-informational then it does not piddle whalebone. sent15: that the nonsteroid is not a L-dopa hold if the darkroom is not a protamine and it is not a boyhood. sent16: if something that does scribble pops then the cookhouse does not bowl. sent17: that the cookhouse is a bowls and is a boyhood is wrong. sent18: that the cookhouse is armillary thing that does mystify sprechgesang is wrong. sent19: if that something does mystify sprechgesang and is not a protamine is not correct it does not bowl. sent20: that the pickerel does not pop is not wrong. sent21: the cookhouse is a kind of a ecobabble. sent22: if there is something such that it is a kind of a scribble and it is not a pop then the fact that the cookhouse is not a kind of a bowls is correct.
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the nonsteroid is not a L-dopa.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the pickerel scribbles and is not a pop.; int2 -> int3: something is a scribble that is not a pop.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the cookhouse is not a kind of a bowls.; sent12 -> int5: the cookhouse is not informational if that it is armillary and it does not mystify sprechgesang is false.; sent2 & sent21 -> int6: the fact that the cookhouse is armillary but it does not mystify sprechgesang is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cookhouse is not informational.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the cookhouse does not bowl and is not informational.; sent14 -> int9: the cookhouse does not piddle whalebone if it is not a bowls and not informational.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the cookhouse does piddle whalebone.
sent4 -> int10: if the nonsteroid is a pop either it is not a L-dopa or it is not a scribble or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the cookhouse piddles whalebone. ; $context$ = sent1: the darkroom is not a scribble if the fact that either the nonsteroid is not a L-dopa or it is not a scribble or both hold. sent2: if the cookhouse is a ecobabble that it is a kind of armillary thing that does not mystify sprechgesang is not correct. sent3: the darkroom is not a kind of a ecobabble and it is not a boyhood. sent4: if the fact that something is a kind of a pop is true then it is not a L-dopa and/or is not a scribble. sent5: the darkroom is not a protamine and is not a boyhood. sent6: if the nonsteroid is not a kind of a L-dopa then the pickerel is both a scribble and not a pop. sent7: something is non-informational if it mystifies sprechgesang. sent8: the nonsteroid does pop and bowls if it is not informational. sent9: if the darkroom is not a protamine but a boyhood then the nonsteroid is not a L-dopa. sent10: the cookhouse is not loose and it is not a consumptive. sent11: the nonsteroid is not a scribble. sent12: something is non-informational if the fact that it is armillary and it does not mystify sprechgesang is incorrect. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a pop. sent14: if something is both not a bowls and non-informational then it does not piddle whalebone. sent15: that the nonsteroid is not a L-dopa hold if the darkroom is not a protamine and it is not a boyhood. sent16: if something that does scribble pops then the cookhouse does not bowl. sent17: that the cookhouse is a bowls and is a boyhood is wrong. sent18: that the cookhouse is armillary thing that does mystify sprechgesang is wrong. sent19: if that something does mystify sprechgesang and is not a protamine is not correct it does not bowl. sent20: that the pickerel does not pop is not wrong. sent21: the cookhouse is a kind of a ecobabble. sent22: if there is something such that it is a kind of a scribble and it is not a pop then the fact that the cookhouse is not a kind of a bowls is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the nonsteroid is not a L-dopa.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the pickerel scribbles and is not a pop.; int2 -> int3: something is a scribble that is not a pop.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the cookhouse is not a kind of a bowls.; sent12 -> int5: the cookhouse is not informational if that it is armillary and it does not mystify sprechgesang is false.; sent2 & sent21 -> int6: the fact that the cookhouse is armillary but it does not mystify sprechgesang is false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the cookhouse is not informational.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the cookhouse does not bowl and is not informational.; sent14 -> int9: the cookhouse does not piddle whalebone if it is not a bowls and not informational.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__