the snailfish does not lap frontlet.
sent1: the snailfish is cataclinal and it is a Cooper. sent2: the thermistor laps frontlet. sent3: there exists something such that it is Platonistic. sent4: the thyronine is not a stamp but it is a hypercatalectic if the desiccant is a suitability. sent5: the fact that the thermistor does not clean but it is a hold does not hold. sent6: something is a kind of a hold that is a faith if it is not Platonistic. sent7: if something laps frontlet it is a bride-gift. sent8: if something that holds is a faith the crochet cleans. sent9: if the snailfish laps frontlet and it is a faith then it is not a cleaning. sent10: the fact that the thermistor is a kind of non-cleaning thing that is not a hold is not true if the snailfish is not a kind of a cleaning. sent11: if the thyronine is a kind of a hypercatalectic the snailfish is hypercatalectic. sent12: if the snailfish is not cleaning that the thermistor is cleaning a hold is wrong. sent13: if something that is cataclinal is a kind of a hypercatalectic then it is not Platonistic. sent14: the snailfish is a faith. sent15: if there exists something such that it is Platonistic the thermistor is not a cleaning and not a hold. sent16: the crochet does lap frontlet if the thermistor does lap frontlet. sent17: the fact that the thermistor is a kind of a cleaning but it is not a hold is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snailfish laps frontlet.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the snailfish laps frontlet and is a kind of a faith.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the snailfish does not clean.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: that the thermistor is not a kind of a cleaning and it is not a hold is incorrect.; sent3 & sent15 -> int4: the thermistor does not clean and does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the crochet cleans and it is a bride-gift.
sent6 -> int6: the snailfish is a hold and it is a faith if it is not Platonistic.; sent13 -> int7: if the snailfish is cataclinal thing that is hypercatalectic then it is not Platonistic.; sent1 -> int8: the snailfish is cataclinal.; sent7 -> int9: if the crochet laps frontlet then it is a bride-gift.; sent16 & sent2 -> int10: the crochet laps frontlet.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the crochet is a bride-gift.;
$hypothesis$ = the snailfish does not lap frontlet. ; $context$ = sent1: the snailfish is cataclinal and it is a Cooper. sent2: the thermistor laps frontlet. sent3: there exists something such that it is Platonistic. sent4: the thyronine is not a stamp but it is a hypercatalectic if the desiccant is a suitability. sent5: the fact that the thermistor does not clean but it is a hold does not hold. sent6: something is a kind of a hold that is a faith if it is not Platonistic. sent7: if something laps frontlet it is a bride-gift. sent8: if something that holds is a faith the crochet cleans. sent9: if the snailfish laps frontlet and it is a faith then it is not a cleaning. sent10: the fact that the thermistor is a kind of non-cleaning thing that is not a hold is not true if the snailfish is not a kind of a cleaning. sent11: if the thyronine is a kind of a hypercatalectic the snailfish is hypercatalectic. sent12: if the snailfish is not cleaning that the thermistor is cleaning a hold is wrong. sent13: if something that is cataclinal is a kind of a hypercatalectic then it is not Platonistic. sent14: the snailfish is a faith. sent15: if there exists something such that it is Platonistic the thermistor is not a cleaning and not a hold. sent16: the crochet does lap frontlet if the thermistor does lap frontlet. sent17: the fact that the thermistor is a kind of a cleaning but it is not a hold is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snailfish laps frontlet.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the snailfish laps frontlet and is a kind of a faith.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the snailfish does not clean.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: that the thermistor is not a kind of a cleaning and it is not a hold is incorrect.; sent3 & sent15 -> int4: the thermistor does not clean and does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__