the fact that the bailiwick is a scorpion hold if the Exocet is not radiolucent but it does stigmatize bract.
sent1: the Exocet is tentacular. sent2: the Exocet is not non-radiolucent if it does not stigmatize bract and it is a hire. sent3: the Exocet does stigmatize bract. sent4: that the Exocet is a kind of a scorpion is true if the bailiwick is radiolucent. sent5: if the toyshop is a hire then the lascar is tentacular. sent6: the fact that the bailiwick is tentacular is true if that the toyshop is a kind of a scorpion is not incorrect. sent7: the Exocet is a scorpion if the bailiwick stigmatizes bract. sent8: if the toyshop is tentacular then the lascar is a hire. sent9: the bailiwick is a scorpion if the Exocet is radiolucent and stigmatizes bract. sent10: the Exocet is not radiolucent. sent11: the Exocet is a kind of a hire if the lascar is intralinguistic. sent12: the Exocet is intralinguistic if it is radiolucent thing that stigmatizes bract. sent13: the bailiwick is a scorpion if the lascar does hire. sent14: that that the toyshop is not tentacular is not correct is not incorrect if the Exocet is intralinguistic. sent15: if the toyshop does not stigmatize bract but it is not non-tentacular the Exocet is radiolucent. sent16: the lascar is not a kind of a Lasso and is radiolucent. sent17: the fact that the lascar is radiolucent hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bailiwick is a scorpion hold if the Exocet is not radiolucent but it does stigmatize bract. ; $context$ = sent1: the Exocet is tentacular. sent2: the Exocet is not non-radiolucent if it does not stigmatize bract and it is a hire. sent3: the Exocet does stigmatize bract. sent4: that the Exocet is a kind of a scorpion is true if the bailiwick is radiolucent. sent5: if the toyshop is a hire then the lascar is tentacular. sent6: the fact that the bailiwick is tentacular is true if that the toyshop is a kind of a scorpion is not incorrect. sent7: the Exocet is a scorpion if the bailiwick stigmatizes bract. sent8: if the toyshop is tentacular then the lascar is a hire. sent9: the bailiwick is a scorpion if the Exocet is radiolucent and stigmatizes bract. sent10: the Exocet is not radiolucent. sent11: the Exocet is a kind of a hire if the lascar is intralinguistic. sent12: the Exocet is intralinguistic if it is radiolucent thing that stigmatizes bract. sent13: the bailiwick is a scorpion if the lascar does hire. sent14: that that the toyshop is not tentacular is not correct is not incorrect if the Exocet is intralinguistic. sent15: if the toyshop does not stigmatize bract but it is not non-tentacular the Exocet is radiolucent. sent16: the lascar is not a kind of a Lasso and is radiolucent. sent17: the fact that the lascar is radiolucent hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__