the coiffeuse multiplies stove and it does multiply arrest.
sent1: if something is a claimant the fact that it pulsates and it is not archival does not hold. sent2: the fact that the coiffeuse multiplies arrest and is archival if that the portcullis is not Vietnamese is not wrong is right. sent3: if something that is a kind of a hypocycloid is a claimant then the coiffeuse multiplies stove. sent4: something is aphoristic and it is a lateen. sent5: if the Lomotil does not thrombose then that the fact that the exhibitionism is aphoristic and it is a lateen is correct is incorrect. sent6: the Lomotil pulsates if there is something such that it does not thrombose. sent7: the fact that the coiffeuse is not aphoristic is correct if the fact that the exhibitionism is a kind of aphoristic a lateen is not true. sent8: that something does multiply stove and it multiplies arrest is false if the fact that it is non-aphoristic is right. sent9: if the fact that the bridgehead does pulsate but it is not archival is wrong the portcullis does not pulsate. sent10: if the rent does not multiply effusion the bridgehead is a claimant that is Vietnamese. sent11: the portcullis is not a Vietnamese. sent12: if something is aphoristic and is a kind of a lateen the exhibitionism does not thrombose. sent13: if the portcullis does not pulsate then the fact that the stove does not thrombose or it is not a kind of a hypocycloid or both is not true. sent14: the stove is a kind of a claimant and multiplies effusion. sent15: the Lomotil does not thrombose if that either the stove does not thrombose or it is not a hypocycloid or both is not right. sent16: if the Lomotil pulsates the stove is a kind of a hypocycloid.
sent4 & sent12 -> int1: that the exhibitionism does not thrombose is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not thrombose is right.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the Lomotil pulsates is correct.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the stove is a kind of a hypocycloid.; sent14 -> int5: the stove is a claimant.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stove is a hypocycloid and is a kind of a claimant.; int6 -> int7: something is both a hypocycloid and a claimant.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the coiffeuse does multiply stove.; sent2 & sent11 -> int9: the coiffeuse multiplies arrest and is archival.; int9 -> int10: the coiffeuse multiplies arrest.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the coiffeuse multiplies stove and it does multiply arrest is not correct.
sent8 -> int11: if the coiffeuse is not aphoristic then the fact that it multiplies stove and does multiply arrest is wrong.; sent1 -> int12: the fact that the bridgehead does pulsate but it is not archival is not true if it is a claimant.;
$hypothesis$ = the coiffeuse multiplies stove and it does multiply arrest. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a claimant the fact that it pulsates and it is not archival does not hold. sent2: the fact that the coiffeuse multiplies arrest and is archival if that the portcullis is not Vietnamese is not wrong is right. sent3: if something that is a kind of a hypocycloid is a claimant then the coiffeuse multiplies stove. sent4: something is aphoristic and it is a lateen. sent5: if the Lomotil does not thrombose then that the fact that the exhibitionism is aphoristic and it is a lateen is correct is incorrect. sent6: the Lomotil pulsates if there is something such that it does not thrombose. sent7: the fact that the coiffeuse is not aphoristic is correct if the fact that the exhibitionism is a kind of aphoristic a lateen is not true. sent8: that something does multiply stove and it multiplies arrest is false if the fact that it is non-aphoristic is right. sent9: if the fact that the bridgehead does pulsate but it is not archival is wrong the portcullis does not pulsate. sent10: if the rent does not multiply effusion the bridgehead is a claimant that is Vietnamese. sent11: the portcullis is not a Vietnamese. sent12: if something is aphoristic and is a kind of a lateen the exhibitionism does not thrombose. sent13: if the portcullis does not pulsate then the fact that the stove does not thrombose or it is not a kind of a hypocycloid or both is not true. sent14: the stove is a kind of a claimant and multiplies effusion. sent15: the Lomotil does not thrombose if that either the stove does not thrombose or it is not a hypocycloid or both is not right. sent16: if the Lomotil pulsates the stove is a kind of a hypocycloid. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent12 -> int1: that the exhibitionism does not thrombose is not wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does not thrombose is right.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the Lomotil pulsates is correct.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the stove is a kind of a hypocycloid.; sent14 -> int5: the stove is a claimant.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stove is a hypocycloid and is a kind of a claimant.; int6 -> int7: something is both a hypocycloid and a claimant.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the coiffeuse does multiply stove.; sent2 & sent11 -> int9: the coiffeuse multiplies arrest and is archival.; int9 -> int10: the coiffeuse multiplies arrest.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__