either the Mills is not a kind of a Bahraini or it is not a Cuniculus or both.
sent1: the handline is a kind of a broker-dealer that is a kind of a cohort if there is something such that it is hydrophobic. sent2: something is not a kind of a broker-dealer if it is a backhander and/or it does huff. sent3: if the commuter is not a kind of a Bahraini then the fact that the fact that the Mills is Bahraini or it is not a Cuniculus or both is incorrect is not false. sent4: the handline is a huff if it finalizes selectwoman. sent5: something is either not a Bahraini or not a Cuniculus or both if it does not finalize selectwoman. sent6: the libertine is hydrophobic. sent7: that the handline is a cohort is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is hydrophobic. sent8: if the handline does not finalize selectwoman that the procuress does not finalize selectwoman and it is non-American is not correct. sent9: if that the procuress does not finalize selectwoman and is not a kind of a American is incorrect then the commuter is not a Bahraini.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handline does finalize selectwoman.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the handline huffs.; int1 -> int2: the handline is a backhander or it huffs or both.; sent2 -> int3: the handline is not a broker-dealer if it is a backhander and/or it is a huff.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the handline is not a broker-dealer.; sent6 -> int5: something is hydrophobic.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the handline is a kind of a broker-dealer and is a cohort.; int6 -> int7: the handline is a broker-dealer.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the handline does not finalize selectwoman.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the fact that the procuress does not finalize selectwoman and it is non-American is not right.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the commuter is not a kind of a Bahraini.; int11 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the Mills is not a kind of a Bahraini or it is not a kind of a Cuniculus or both.
sent5 -> int12: if that the Mills does not finalize selectwoman is right then either it is not Bahraini or it is not a Cuniculus or both.;
$hypothesis$ = either the Mills is not a kind of a Bahraini or it is not a Cuniculus or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the handline is a kind of a broker-dealer that is a kind of a cohort if there is something such that it is hydrophobic. sent2: something is not a kind of a broker-dealer if it is a backhander and/or it does huff. sent3: if the commuter is not a kind of a Bahraini then the fact that the fact that the Mills is Bahraini or it is not a Cuniculus or both is incorrect is not false. sent4: the handline is a huff if it finalizes selectwoman. sent5: something is either not a Bahraini or not a Cuniculus or both if it does not finalize selectwoman. sent6: the libertine is hydrophobic. sent7: that the handline is a cohort is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is hydrophobic. sent8: if the handline does not finalize selectwoman that the procuress does not finalize selectwoman and it is non-American is not correct. sent9: if that the procuress does not finalize selectwoman and is not a kind of a American is incorrect then the commuter is not a Bahraini. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the handline does finalize selectwoman.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the handline huffs.; int1 -> int2: the handline is a backhander or it huffs or both.; sent2 -> int3: the handline is not a broker-dealer if it is a backhander and/or it is a huff.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the handline is not a broker-dealer.; sent6 -> int5: something is hydrophobic.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the handline is a kind of a broker-dealer and is a cohort.; int6 -> int7: the handline is a broker-dealer.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the handline does not finalize selectwoman.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the fact that the procuress does not finalize selectwoman and it is non-American is not right.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the commuter is not a kind of a Bahraini.; int11 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__