the trophotropism is a microflora.
sent1: the ethanol seals if the ape is not a kind of a Zambian and it is not lossy. sent2: that the span does not malinger Lauraceae and is not an idler is not true. sent3: the ethanol is lossy if the fact that the ape is lossy is right. sent4: either the ape is lossy or it does malinger Lauraceae or both if there is something such that it does spy. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a microflora then the fact that the intussusception does not bop Astacus is not incorrect. sent6: the trophotropism does malinger Lauraceae. sent7: the ethanol is a Timorese if there is something such that that it is both an idler and a seal does not hold. sent8: that the ethanol is an idler is true if there is something such that the fact that it does malinger trophotropism and it is Bismarckian is not right. sent9: the fact that the ethanol is lossy is not wrong if the ape malingers Lauraceae. sent10: if there is something such that that it does not malinger Lauraceae and is not an idler is not correct that the ape is an idler is not false. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it malingers trophotropism and is Bismarckian is incorrect. sent12: that if something that does not malinger trophotropism is Bismarckian then the fact that it spies is correct is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that if the fact that the sociologist undresses sociologist but it is not a bellow does not hold then the flap is not isothermic is correct. sent14: if the flap is non-isothermic then it is a microflora that does unlock. sent15: if the fact that either something bops Astacus or it does malinger Lauraceae or both is not right then it is a kind of a microflora. sent16: the span is not a kind of a spy if something that does seal is an idler. sent17: the fact that the span is a kind of an idler and it does seal is not true if the intussusception does not bop Astacus. sent18: if the span does not spy the fact that the trophotropism does malinger Lauraceae is not incorrect. sent19: the ape is not a kind of a Zambian. sent20: the ape is both not a Zambian and not lossy. sent21: something is a microflora if the fact that it does bop Astacus or does not malinger Lauraceae or both does not hold. sent22: that the sociologist does undress sociologist and is not a kind of a bellow is not correct.
sent1 & sent20 -> int1: the ethanol is a seal.; sent11 & sent8 -> int2: the ethanol is an idler.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ethanol is both a seal and an idler.; int3 -> int4: something seals and is an idler.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the span is not a spy.; sent21 -> int6: the trophotropism is a microflora if the fact that either it bops Astacus or it does not malinger Lauraceae or both is not true.;
the trophotropism is not a kind of a microflora.
sent2 -> int7: that there is something such that the fact that it does not malinger Lauraceae and it is not an idler is wrong is not wrong.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the ape is an idler.;
$hypothesis$ = the trophotropism is a microflora. ; $context$ = sent1: the ethanol seals if the ape is not a kind of a Zambian and it is not lossy. sent2: that the span does not malinger Lauraceae and is not an idler is not true. sent3: the ethanol is lossy if the fact that the ape is lossy is right. sent4: either the ape is lossy or it does malinger Lauraceae or both if there is something such that it does spy. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a microflora then the fact that the intussusception does not bop Astacus is not incorrect. sent6: the trophotropism does malinger Lauraceae. sent7: the ethanol is a Timorese if there is something such that that it is both an idler and a seal does not hold. sent8: that the ethanol is an idler is true if there is something such that the fact that it does malinger trophotropism and it is Bismarckian is not right. sent9: the fact that the ethanol is lossy is not wrong if the ape malingers Lauraceae. sent10: if there is something such that that it does not malinger Lauraceae and is not an idler is not correct that the ape is an idler is not false. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it malingers trophotropism and is Bismarckian is incorrect. sent12: that if something that does not malinger trophotropism is Bismarckian then the fact that it spies is correct is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that if the fact that the sociologist undresses sociologist but it is not a bellow does not hold then the flap is not isothermic is correct. sent14: if the flap is non-isothermic then it is a microflora that does unlock. sent15: if the fact that either something bops Astacus or it does malinger Lauraceae or both is not right then it is a kind of a microflora. sent16: the span is not a kind of a spy if something that does seal is an idler. sent17: the fact that the span is a kind of an idler and it does seal is not true if the intussusception does not bop Astacus. sent18: if the span does not spy the fact that the trophotropism does malinger Lauraceae is not incorrect. sent19: the ape is not a kind of a Zambian. sent20: the ape is both not a Zambian and not lossy. sent21: something is a microflora if the fact that it does bop Astacus or does not malinger Lauraceae or both does not hold. sent22: that the sociologist does undress sociologist and is not a kind of a bellow is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent20 -> int1: the ethanol is a seal.; sent11 & sent8 -> int2: the ethanol is an idler.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ethanol is both a seal and an idler.; int3 -> int4: something seals and is an idler.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the span is not a spy.; sent21 -> int6: the trophotropism is a microflora if the fact that either it bops Astacus or it does not malinger Lauraceae or both is not true.; __UNKNOWN__