the episome is not bloody.
sent1: something is not a plunderer if the fact that it is not a kind of a saddle and is not inaesthetic is not true. sent2: that the fact that the electrometer is a plunderer and it does waste ghat is incorrect hold if there is something such that it is incapable. sent3: if that something does not waste ghat and is not a plunderer is incorrect then it is not incapable. sent4: something is not incapable if it is a kind of a plunderer. sent5: the wharfage does not saddle. sent6: if the milldam letters unworthiness the fact that it is incapable is right. sent7: that something is not a depletion if that it does not log obolus and does not transaminate Gallup does not hold is correct. sent8: something does not log Newgate if the fact that it is not a kind of a Rasputin and it is not hydrophilic is not right. sent9: the electrometer is not unsensational. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a sweetbread the wharfage is not ischemic. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is inaesthetic and it is ischemic is false then the electrometer is not a kind of a Orozco. sent12: the wharfage wastes implement and/or it is a kind of a saddle. sent13: something does not bloody if either it does letter unworthiness or it is not incapable or both. sent14: the fact that the wharfage does bloody and is ischemic does not hold. sent15: the fact that the wharfage is inaesthetic thing that is ischemic is not right if it does not saddle. sent16: the electrometer does not log plodder. sent17: that the milldam does letter unworthiness is not wrong. sent18: the wharfage is ischemic and/or is not bloody.
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: that the wharfage is inaesthetic and it is ischemic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is both inaesthetic and ischemic is incorrect.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the electrometer is not a Orozco.; sent3 -> int4: if that the episome does not waste ghat and is not a plunderer does not hold then it is capable.; sent13 -> int5: if the episome does letter unworthiness or it is not incapable or both then it is not bloody.;
the episome is bloody.
sent6 & sent17 -> int6: the milldam is incapable.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not capable.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: that the electrometer is a plunderer and it wastes ghat is not right.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is a plunderer and it wastes ghat does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the episome is not bloody. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a plunderer if the fact that it is not a kind of a saddle and is not inaesthetic is not true. sent2: that the fact that the electrometer is a plunderer and it does waste ghat is incorrect hold if there is something such that it is incapable. sent3: if that something does not waste ghat and is not a plunderer is incorrect then it is not incapable. sent4: something is not incapable if it is a kind of a plunderer. sent5: the wharfage does not saddle. sent6: if the milldam letters unworthiness the fact that it is incapable is right. sent7: that something is not a depletion if that it does not log obolus and does not transaminate Gallup does not hold is correct. sent8: something does not log Newgate if the fact that it is not a kind of a Rasputin and it is not hydrophilic is not right. sent9: the electrometer is not unsensational. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a sweetbread the wharfage is not ischemic. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is inaesthetic and it is ischemic is false then the electrometer is not a kind of a Orozco. sent12: the wharfage wastes implement and/or it is a kind of a saddle. sent13: something does not bloody if either it does letter unworthiness or it is not incapable or both. sent14: the fact that the wharfage does bloody and is ischemic does not hold. sent15: the fact that the wharfage is inaesthetic thing that is ischemic is not right if it does not saddle. sent16: the electrometer does not log plodder. sent17: that the milldam does letter unworthiness is not wrong. sent18: the wharfage is ischemic and/or is not bloody. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: that the wharfage is inaesthetic and it is ischemic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is both inaesthetic and ischemic is incorrect.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the electrometer is not a Orozco.; sent3 -> int4: if that the episome does not waste ghat and is not a plunderer does not hold then it is capable.; sent13 -> int5: if the episome does letter unworthiness or it is not incapable or both then it is not bloody.; __UNKNOWN__