there exists something such that if it is not a furcation then it is macaronic and it incurvates neurofibroma.
sent1: if the mastiff is not a Zion then it enters radicalism and it is a whiting. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a furcation it is macaronic. sent3: if something is not puerperal then it is dyslexic and it does enter Chlamyphorus. sent4: if the muralist is not a furcation that it is macaronic thing that does incurvate neurofibroma is not incorrect. sent5: if the muralist is a furcation it is a kind of macaronic thing that does incurvate neurofibroma. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a furcation it incurvates neurofibroma. sent7: the muralist is macaronic if that it is not a furcation is right. sent8: if the muralist does not credit taffy it is macaronic and it is agranulocytic. sent9: something incurvates westerner and it is atrophic if it is not a kind of a EU. sent10: the kalansuwa is a prefix and despotic if it is a backstay. sent11: there is something such that if it is not mitotic it manages and is a forefoot. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a furcation it is macaronic and it incurvates neurofibroma. sent13: if that the muralist is not macaronic is correct it is a logician and it is mitotic. sent14: the muralist is a kind of a backpack and it does animate if it undertakes.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a EU it incurvates westerner and it is not non-atrophic.
sent9 -> int1: the socialist incurvates westerner and is atrophic if it is not a EU.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a furcation then it is macaronic and it incurvates neurofibroma. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mastiff is not a Zion then it enters radicalism and it is a whiting. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a furcation it is macaronic. sent3: if something is not puerperal then it is dyslexic and it does enter Chlamyphorus. sent4: if the muralist is not a furcation that it is macaronic thing that does incurvate neurofibroma is not incorrect. sent5: if the muralist is a furcation it is a kind of macaronic thing that does incurvate neurofibroma. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a furcation it incurvates neurofibroma. sent7: the muralist is macaronic if that it is not a furcation is right. sent8: if the muralist does not credit taffy it is macaronic and it is agranulocytic. sent9: something incurvates westerner and it is atrophic if it is not a kind of a EU. sent10: the kalansuwa is a prefix and despotic if it is a backstay. sent11: there is something such that if it is not mitotic it manages and is a forefoot. sent12: there is something such that if it is a kind of a furcation it is macaronic and it incurvates neurofibroma. sent13: if that the muralist is not macaronic is correct it is a logician and it is mitotic. sent14: the muralist is a kind of a backpack and it does animate if it undertakes. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__