the coville is not evidentiary.
sent1: the butcherbird is actinomorphic and it is a Chekhov. sent2: if the butcherbird is not a kind of a Chekhov the syncarp is not actinomorphic. sent3: the coville is a kind of a fez if the butcherbird is a faint but it is not a Gibraltarian. sent4: if the bucket does promise predestination or it is a stinker or both the fact that that the coville is evidentiary is false is true. sent5: something is not a kind of a stinker or it is not a kind of an intervention or both if it is a fez. sent6: the butcherbird is actinomorphic. sent7: the butcherbird is a Appleton if there exists something such that that it either is not a circularity or is not typographic or both does not hold. sent8: there is nothing that is not evidentiary but a stinker. sent9: the redcap promises predestination. sent10: if something does trumpet then that it is actinomorphic and it is not a kind of a Chekhov is false. sent11: a non-actinomorphic thing does not trumpet. sent12: something is a kind of a faint but it is not Gibraltarian if it is a kind of a Appleton. sent13: if something promises predestination then it trumpets. sent14: if that the bucket is not a kind of a Chekhov and is a stinker is correct then the butcherbird is not a kind of a Chekhov. sent15: either the bonefish is marmorean or it is a counterplot or both. sent16: the nonagenarian is marmorean if the bonefish is marmorean. sent17: if the nonagenarian is marmorean that the skeptic is marmorean is not incorrect. sent18: the nonagenarian is marmorean if the bonefish counterplots. sent19: there exists nothing such that it does not promise predestination and it trumpets. sent20: something is evidentiary if the fact that it is actinomorphic thing that is not a Chekhov is wrong. sent21: the bucket trumpets if that the butcherbird is a Chekhov hold. sent22: that the bucket either is not a circularity or is not typographic or both does not hold if the skeptic is marmorean.
sent1 -> int1: the butcherbird is a kind of a Chekhov.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: that the bucket does trumpet is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bucket does not promise predestination.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the bucket does not promise predestination but it does trumpet.; sent19 -> int4: that the bucket does not promise predestination but it does trumpet does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the bucket promises predestination is correct.; int6 -> int7: the bucket promises predestination and/or it is a stinker.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the coville is evidentiary.
sent20 -> int8: if the fact that the coville is actinomorphic but not a Chekhov does not hold the fact that it is evidentiary is right.; sent10 -> int9: the fact that the coville is actinomorphic but it is not a Chekhov does not hold if it trumpets.; sent13 -> int10: if the coville promises predestination it trumpets.; sent5 -> int11: the coville is not a kind of a stinker or is not an intervention or both if that it is a fez hold.; sent12 -> int12: the butcherbird does faint but it is not Gibraltarian if it is a kind of a Appleton.; sent15 & sent16 & sent18 -> int13: the nonagenarian is marmorean.; sent17 & int13 -> int14: the skeptic is marmorean.; sent22 & int14 -> int15: that the bucket is not a circularity or it is not typographic or both does not hold.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it is not a circularity or it is not typographic or both is incorrect.; int16 & sent7 -> int17: the butcherbird is a kind of a Appleton.; int12 & int17 -> int18: the butcherbird is a kind of a faint but it is not a Gibraltarian.; sent3 & int18 -> int19: the coville is a kind of a fez.; int11 & int19 -> int20: the coville is not a kind of a stinker or is not an intervention or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the coville is not evidentiary. ; $context$ = sent1: the butcherbird is actinomorphic and it is a Chekhov. sent2: if the butcherbird is not a kind of a Chekhov the syncarp is not actinomorphic. sent3: the coville is a kind of a fez if the butcherbird is a faint but it is not a Gibraltarian. sent4: if the bucket does promise predestination or it is a stinker or both the fact that that the coville is evidentiary is false is true. sent5: something is not a kind of a stinker or it is not a kind of an intervention or both if it is a fez. sent6: the butcherbird is actinomorphic. sent7: the butcherbird is a Appleton if there exists something such that that it either is not a circularity or is not typographic or both does not hold. sent8: there is nothing that is not evidentiary but a stinker. sent9: the redcap promises predestination. sent10: if something does trumpet then that it is actinomorphic and it is not a kind of a Chekhov is false. sent11: a non-actinomorphic thing does not trumpet. sent12: something is a kind of a faint but it is not Gibraltarian if it is a kind of a Appleton. sent13: if something promises predestination then it trumpets. sent14: if that the bucket is not a kind of a Chekhov and is a stinker is correct then the butcherbird is not a kind of a Chekhov. sent15: either the bonefish is marmorean or it is a counterplot or both. sent16: the nonagenarian is marmorean if the bonefish is marmorean. sent17: if the nonagenarian is marmorean that the skeptic is marmorean is not incorrect. sent18: the nonagenarian is marmorean if the bonefish counterplots. sent19: there exists nothing such that it does not promise predestination and it trumpets. sent20: something is evidentiary if the fact that it is actinomorphic thing that is not a Chekhov is wrong. sent21: the bucket trumpets if that the butcherbird is a Chekhov hold. sent22: that the bucket either is not a circularity or is not typographic or both does not hold if the skeptic is marmorean. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the butcherbird is a kind of a Chekhov.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: that the bucket does trumpet is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bucket does not promise predestination.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the bucket does not promise predestination but it does trumpet.; sent19 -> int4: that the bucket does not promise predestination but it does trumpet does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the bucket promises predestination is correct.; int6 -> int7: the bucket promises predestination and/or it is a stinker.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__