if the fact that the biscuit does outgrow Podicipedidae is true then the peculiarity tosses in-joke.
sent1: the fact that that the peculiarity is a kind of cartographic thing that does not toss in-joke does not hold is not incorrect if it is not a choppiness. sent2: if the fact that the tutsan is a fussiness but it is not a choppiness is not right then the biscuit outgrows Podicipedidae. sent3: if the biscuit hydroplanes then the cystolith does outgrow Podicipedidae. sent4: if that the tutsan is a fussiness but it is not a choppiness is false then the biscuit does not outgrow Podicipedidae. sent5: the biscuit is a shakedown. sent6: that that the tutsan is a fussiness but it is not a choppiness is true is incorrect if it is not cartographic. sent7: the bogmat does outgrow Podicipedidae. sent8: if the cystolith is a kind of a fussiness then the tutsan does hydroplane. sent9: if the tutsan is a choppiness the biscuit does not outgrow Podicipedidae. sent10: that the tutsan is a fussiness and it is a kind of a choppiness does not hold. sent11: that something is a kind of cartographic thing that does not outgrow Podicipedidae does not hold if it is not unsent. sent12: if the tutsan is not a kind of a fussiness then that it hydroplanes and is not unsent is not true. sent13: the fact that the tutsan is a fussiness and it is a kind of a choppiness is not correct if it is not cartographic. sent14: the scoffer does toss in-joke. sent15: the tutsan is not hydrokinetic. sent16: that the tutsan is not unsent and hydroplanes is false if the cystolith is not a loaf. sent17: if the fact that the peculiarity is a fussiness and not unsent does not hold the tutsan is not a choppiness. sent18: the tutsan hydroplanes if it is a fussiness. sent19: the peculiarity does toss in-joke if the cystolith does hydroplane. sent20: something is unsent if it is cartographic. sent21: if either the biscuit hydroplanes or it is not unsent or both the tutsan is not unsent. sent22: the peculiarity is cartographic. sent23: that the biscuit outgrows hegemony and does not toss in-joke is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tutsan is not cartographic.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the tutsan is a fussiness that is not a choppiness is false is not incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the biscuit does not outgrow Podicipedidae.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the biscuit does outgrow Podicipedidae.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tutsan is cartographic.; sent20 -> int5: if the tutsan is cartographic it is unsent.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the tutsan is unsent.;
the biscuit does toss in-joke.
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the biscuit does outgrow Podicipedidae is true then the peculiarity tosses in-joke. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the peculiarity is a kind of cartographic thing that does not toss in-joke does not hold is not incorrect if it is not a choppiness. sent2: if the fact that the tutsan is a fussiness but it is not a choppiness is not right then the biscuit outgrows Podicipedidae. sent3: if the biscuit hydroplanes then the cystolith does outgrow Podicipedidae. sent4: if that the tutsan is a fussiness but it is not a choppiness is false then the biscuit does not outgrow Podicipedidae. sent5: the biscuit is a shakedown. sent6: that that the tutsan is a fussiness but it is not a choppiness is true is incorrect if it is not cartographic. sent7: the bogmat does outgrow Podicipedidae. sent8: if the cystolith is a kind of a fussiness then the tutsan does hydroplane. sent9: if the tutsan is a choppiness the biscuit does not outgrow Podicipedidae. sent10: that the tutsan is a fussiness and it is a kind of a choppiness does not hold. sent11: that something is a kind of cartographic thing that does not outgrow Podicipedidae does not hold if it is not unsent. sent12: if the tutsan is not a kind of a fussiness then that it hydroplanes and is not unsent is not true. sent13: the fact that the tutsan is a fussiness and it is a kind of a choppiness is not correct if it is not cartographic. sent14: the scoffer does toss in-joke. sent15: the tutsan is not hydrokinetic. sent16: that the tutsan is not unsent and hydroplanes is false if the cystolith is not a loaf. sent17: if the fact that the peculiarity is a fussiness and not unsent does not hold the tutsan is not a choppiness. sent18: the tutsan hydroplanes if it is a fussiness. sent19: the peculiarity does toss in-joke if the cystolith does hydroplane. sent20: something is unsent if it is cartographic. sent21: if either the biscuit hydroplanes or it is not unsent or both the tutsan is not unsent. sent22: the peculiarity is cartographic. sent23: that the biscuit outgrows hegemony and does not toss in-joke is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tutsan is not cartographic.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the tutsan is a fussiness that is not a choppiness is false is not incorrect.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the biscuit does not outgrow Podicipedidae.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the biscuit does outgrow Podicipedidae.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tutsan is cartographic.; sent20 -> int5: if the tutsan is cartographic it is unsent.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the tutsan is unsent.; __UNKNOWN__