there exists something such that it is both a skip and not a firm.
sent1: the fact that the acaricide does not subside acaricide and does not guard neuralgia is false if there exists something such that it is a Rameau. sent2: something is a skip. sent3: if that something does not subside acaricide and does not guard neuralgia is not correct then it does skip. sent4: that the fact that something does not guard neuralgia and is a kind of a Rameau hold is wrong if it subsides acaricide. sent5: the acaricide is a firm. sent6: if something is not a Rameau then it does assent. sent7: the Yahi is not a Rameau if there is something such that that it does not guard neuralgia and it is a Rameau is not right. sent8: the fact that the lineman is not a kind of a skip and does not guard neuralgia does not hold. sent9: the lineman skips and is not a firm if the acaricide does skips. sent10: something is a bentwood if the fact that it does not sack and it is not a kind of a circumvention is not right. sent11: the lineman is a skip but it does not guard neuralgia.
sent3 -> int1: if that the acaricide does not subside acaricide and does not guard neuralgia is false it is a kind of a skip.;
the Yahi is an assent.
sent4 -> int2: if the lineman subsides acaricide the fact that it does not guard neuralgia and is a Rameau is false.; sent6 -> int3: the Yahi is an assent if it is not a Rameau.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is both a skip and not a firm. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the acaricide does not subside acaricide and does not guard neuralgia is false if there exists something such that it is a Rameau. sent2: something is a skip. sent3: if that something does not subside acaricide and does not guard neuralgia is not correct then it does skip. sent4: that the fact that something does not guard neuralgia and is a kind of a Rameau hold is wrong if it subsides acaricide. sent5: the acaricide is a firm. sent6: if something is not a Rameau then it does assent. sent7: the Yahi is not a Rameau if there is something such that that it does not guard neuralgia and it is a Rameau is not right. sent8: the fact that the lineman is not a kind of a skip and does not guard neuralgia does not hold. sent9: the lineman skips and is not a firm if the acaricide does skips. sent10: something is a bentwood if the fact that it does not sack and it is not a kind of a circumvention is not right. sent11: the lineman is a skip but it does not guard neuralgia. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if that the acaricide does not subside acaricide and does not guard neuralgia is false it is a kind of a skip.; __UNKNOWN__