the stadium blues wedge.
sent1: if the fact that something is not genetic but it does blue wedge is false it is not conquerable. sent2: the trophoblast is symmetrical. sent3: the fact that the stadium is not a silverware is not incorrect. sent4: if the stadium is a kind of non-conquerable thing that is not a kind of a silverware then the trophoblast is non-symmetrical.
sent1 -> int1: the stadium is not conquerable if the fact that it is non-genetic thing that blues wedge is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the stadium is a kind of non-genetic thing that blues wedge is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the stadium is not conquerable.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the stadium is not conquerable and is not a silverware.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the trophoblast is not symmetrical.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the stadium is not genetic and blues wedge.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the stadium blues wedge. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not genetic but it does blue wedge is false it is not conquerable. sent2: the trophoblast is symmetrical. sent3: the fact that the stadium is not a silverware is not incorrect. sent4: if the stadium is a kind of non-conquerable thing that is not a kind of a silverware then the trophoblast is non-symmetrical. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the stadium is not conquerable if the fact that it is non-genetic thing that blues wedge is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the stadium is a kind of non-genetic thing that blues wedge is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the stadium is not conquerable.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the stadium is not conquerable and is not a silverware.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the trophoblast is not symmetrical.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the stadium is not genetic and blues wedge.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__