that the encumbrance is a tasting that distinguishes Akwa'ala does not hold.
sent1: a non-still thing is not a celebrant or distinguishes Akwa'ala or both. sent2: that the dogfighter does not shelter Trachipterus and is wieldy is not true if the power is a RV. sent3: the fact that the carousel is non-capitalist thing that does not distinguish propjet is not right if it is papal. sent4: the Islamist is not a panel if the fact that the dogfighter does not shelter Trachipterus but it is wieldy is not right. sent5: that something is non-still but it is papal is not correct if it reproaches. sent6: the carousel is not a capitalist and it does not distinguish propjet if the bradawl does still. sent7: the devil is not non-Palladian. sent8: if either something is not a kind of a celebrant or it does distinguish Akwa'ala or both then it is not a kind of a celebrant. sent9: the bradawl does not distinguish Akwa'ala if the fact that the carousel is non-still thing that is papal is wrong. sent10: the carousel is a kind of a reproach that is mass-spectrometric if the Islamist is not a panel. sent11: if the bradawl is non-wieldy thing that does not shelter Trachipterus it is not mass-spectrometric. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a Fechner the power is a RV and is not protozoological. sent13: the encumbrance does taste and does distinguish Akwa'ala if the Islamist does not distinguish Akwa'ala. sent14: if the bradawl is not a reproach that the Islamist is both a tasting and papal is wrong. sent15: that the carousel is a capitalist that does not distinguish propjet is not correct if it is papal. sent16: the carousel is papal. sent17: if the bradawl is not mass-spectrometric that it does panel and it is a reproach is false. sent18: the Islamist does not distinguish Akwa'ala if there are non-still things. sent19: if that something is both a panel and a reproach is wrong the fact that it is not a reproach is true. sent20: the encumbrance distinguishes Akwa'ala. sent21: if the devil is Palladian it is not a Fechner.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bradawl is a kind of a still.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the carousel is not a kind of a capitalist and it does not distinguish propjet.; sent3 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the carousel is not capitalist and it does not distinguish propjet is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bradawl does not still.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not still is right.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the Islamist does not distinguish Akwa'ala.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the encumbrance tastes and does distinguish Akwa'ala is incorrect.
sent5 -> int7: that the carousel is not still and is papal is wrong if it is a kind of a reproach.; sent21 & sent7 -> int8: the devil is not a Fechner.; int8 -> int9: that there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Fechner is not wrong.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the power is both a RV and not protozoological.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the power is a RV hold.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: that the dogfighter does not shelter Trachipterus but it is wieldy is false.; sent4 & int12 -> int13: that the Islamist is not a panel is correct.; sent10 & int13 -> int14: the carousel is a reproach and it is mass-spectrometric.; int14 -> int15: the carousel does reproach.; int7 & int15 -> int16: that the carousel does not still and is papal is not right.; sent9 & int16 -> int17: the bradawl does not distinguish Akwa'ala.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it does not distinguish Akwa'ala.;
$hypothesis$ = that the encumbrance is a tasting that distinguishes Akwa'ala does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: a non-still thing is not a celebrant or distinguishes Akwa'ala or both. sent2: that the dogfighter does not shelter Trachipterus and is wieldy is not true if the power is a RV. sent3: the fact that the carousel is non-capitalist thing that does not distinguish propjet is not right if it is papal. sent4: the Islamist is not a panel if the fact that the dogfighter does not shelter Trachipterus but it is wieldy is not right. sent5: that something is non-still but it is papal is not correct if it reproaches. sent6: the carousel is not a capitalist and it does not distinguish propjet if the bradawl does still. sent7: the devil is not non-Palladian. sent8: if either something is not a kind of a celebrant or it does distinguish Akwa'ala or both then it is not a kind of a celebrant. sent9: the bradawl does not distinguish Akwa'ala if the fact that the carousel is non-still thing that is papal is wrong. sent10: the carousel is a kind of a reproach that is mass-spectrometric if the Islamist is not a panel. sent11: if the bradawl is non-wieldy thing that does not shelter Trachipterus it is not mass-spectrometric. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a Fechner the power is a RV and is not protozoological. sent13: the encumbrance does taste and does distinguish Akwa'ala if the Islamist does not distinguish Akwa'ala. sent14: if the bradawl is not a reproach that the Islamist is both a tasting and papal is wrong. sent15: that the carousel is a capitalist that does not distinguish propjet is not correct if it is papal. sent16: the carousel is papal. sent17: if the bradawl is not mass-spectrometric that it does panel and it is a reproach is false. sent18: the Islamist does not distinguish Akwa'ala if there are non-still things. sent19: if that something is both a panel and a reproach is wrong the fact that it is not a reproach is true. sent20: the encumbrance distinguishes Akwa'ala. sent21: if the devil is Palladian it is not a Fechner. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bradawl is a kind of a still.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the carousel is not a kind of a capitalist and it does not distinguish propjet.; sent3 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the carousel is not capitalist and it does not distinguish propjet is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bradawl does not still.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not still is right.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the Islamist does not distinguish Akwa'ala.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__