the underperformer does not slime Apogon.
sent1: the underperformer does not slime Apogon if the fact that the nudger is mortuary and it slime Apogon is not false. sent2: the nudger is not cranial. sent3: if something that does not underwrite joke underwrites obedience the underperformer does slime Apogon. sent4: there exists something such that it is a wingspan and it does slime inhaler. sent5: if the fact that something does slime cacao but it is not glottochronological is not true then it does not underwrite joke. sent6: something is not sedimentary if that it underwrites Doliolidae and does not extend nekton is not correct. sent7: if something that does not underwrite joke slimes Apogon then the inhaler slimes cacao. sent8: if the inhaler is tidal then it does not slime cacao. sent9: if the inhaler does not underwrite obedience then that the underperformer does not underwrite obedience but it does slime Apogon is correct. sent10: the inhaler slimes Apogon. sent11: if the nudger does not underwrite joke then the inhaler does not underwrite joke but it underwrites obedience. sent12: the inhaler is not glottochronological and does underwrite obedience. sent13: the moraine does slime caliphate. sent14: something does not slime Apogon and does underwrite joke. sent15: if there is something such that it slimes Apogon that the nudger is glottochronological but it does not underwrite joke is wrong. sent16: if something does slime cacao then that the inhaler is not non-glottochronological but it does not underwrite joke does not hold. sent17: something is mortuary. sent18: the underperformer is not a moshav but it is acetylenic. sent19: if there is something such that it is mortuary then the fact that the nudger slimes cacao and is not glottochronological is wrong. sent20: if the inhaler does not slime Apogon then the underperformer does not slime Apogon but it does underwrite joke.
sent17 & sent19 -> int1: that the nudger slimes cacao but it is not glottochronological is not right.; sent5 -> int2: the nudger does not underwrite joke if the fact that it slimes cacao and it is not glottochronological does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nudger does not underwrite joke.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the inhaler does not underwrite joke and underwrites obedience.; int4 -> int5: something does not underwrite joke but it underwrites obedience.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the underperformer does not slime Apogon.
$hypothesis$ = the underperformer does not slime Apogon. ; $context$ = sent1: the underperformer does not slime Apogon if the fact that the nudger is mortuary and it slime Apogon is not false. sent2: the nudger is not cranial. sent3: if something that does not underwrite joke underwrites obedience the underperformer does slime Apogon. sent4: there exists something such that it is a wingspan and it does slime inhaler. sent5: if the fact that something does slime cacao but it is not glottochronological is not true then it does not underwrite joke. sent6: something is not sedimentary if that it underwrites Doliolidae and does not extend nekton is not correct. sent7: if something that does not underwrite joke slimes Apogon then the inhaler slimes cacao. sent8: if the inhaler is tidal then it does not slime cacao. sent9: if the inhaler does not underwrite obedience then that the underperformer does not underwrite obedience but it does slime Apogon is correct. sent10: the inhaler slimes Apogon. sent11: if the nudger does not underwrite joke then the inhaler does not underwrite joke but it underwrites obedience. sent12: the inhaler is not glottochronological and does underwrite obedience. sent13: the moraine does slime caliphate. sent14: something does not slime Apogon and does underwrite joke. sent15: if there is something such that it slimes Apogon that the nudger is glottochronological but it does not underwrite joke is wrong. sent16: if something does slime cacao then that the inhaler is not non-glottochronological but it does not underwrite joke does not hold. sent17: something is mortuary. sent18: the underperformer is not a moshav but it is acetylenic. sent19: if there is something such that it is mortuary then the fact that the nudger slimes cacao and is not glottochronological is wrong. sent20: if the inhaler does not slime Apogon then the underperformer does not slime Apogon but it does underwrite joke. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent19 -> int1: that the nudger slimes cacao but it is not glottochronological is not right.; sent5 -> int2: the nudger does not underwrite joke if the fact that it slimes cacao and it is not glottochronological does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nudger does not underwrite joke.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the inhaler does not underwrite joke and underwrites obedience.; int4 -> int5: something does not underwrite joke but it underwrites obedience.; int5 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__