the drool fabricates jackpot.
sent1: the drool is interlocutory and it is a Protestant. sent2: the fact that the drool is excusable is not incorrect. sent3: the boulle is a kind of a Salvadoraceae and it is interlocutory. sent4: if the drool does not bed climate but it does align then it fabricates platyctenean. sent5: if the drool is interlocutory then it does not bed climate and aligns. sent6: if the drool does not bed climate then it aligns and is a Protestant.
sent1 -> int1: the drool is interlocutory.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the drool does not bed climate and does align.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the drool fabricates platyctenean.;
the drool does not fabricate jackpot.
$hypothesis$ = the drool fabricates jackpot. ; $context$ = sent1: the drool is interlocutory and it is a Protestant. sent2: the fact that the drool is excusable is not incorrect. sent3: the boulle is a kind of a Salvadoraceae and it is interlocutory. sent4: if the drool does not bed climate but it does align then it fabricates platyctenean. sent5: if the drool is interlocutory then it does not bed climate and aligns. sent6: if the drool does not bed climate then it aligns and is a Protestant. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the drool is interlocutory.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the drool does not bed climate and does align.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the drool fabricates platyctenean.; __UNKNOWN__