the inconclusiveness does not occur if that the advocacy happens is true.
sent1: that the inconclusiveness does not occur is caused by that the cloistering concern happens but the stoking Skaw does not occur. sent2: the sermonizing landlady does not occur if the dendriticness occurs. sent3: that the ascent occurs is not incorrect. sent4: that the advocacy does not occur is not incorrect if the cloistering concern does not occur. sent5: the dendriticness does not occur if the Snow occurs but the suction does not occur. sent6: the appointment does not occur if that the subscription occurs and the unostentatiousness does not occur is not right. sent7: if that the acrogenicness happens but the rebellion does not occur is incorrect the pyrogenicness does not occur. sent8: if that the advocacy does not occur is not correct then the inconclusiveness occurs. sent9: that the reeling occurs and the retrospective does not occur does not hold. sent10: the congregationalness does not occur. sent11: the trophotropicness does not occur. sent12: the cloistering concern happens. sent13: the inconvenientness occurs. sent14: the inconclusiveness happens. sent15: the polyatomicness does not occur if the stoking doughnut and the non-socioeconomicness happens. sent16: if the cloistering concern happens but the stoking Skaw does not occur the inconclusiveness happens. sent17: the cloistering Pan does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the advocacy happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the inconclusiveness does not occur if that the advocacy happens is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the inconclusiveness does not occur is caused by that the cloistering concern happens but the stoking Skaw does not occur. sent2: the sermonizing landlady does not occur if the dendriticness occurs. sent3: that the ascent occurs is not incorrect. sent4: that the advocacy does not occur is not incorrect if the cloistering concern does not occur. sent5: the dendriticness does not occur if the Snow occurs but the suction does not occur. sent6: the appointment does not occur if that the subscription occurs and the unostentatiousness does not occur is not right. sent7: if that the acrogenicness happens but the rebellion does not occur is incorrect the pyrogenicness does not occur. sent8: if that the advocacy does not occur is not correct then the inconclusiveness occurs. sent9: that the reeling occurs and the retrospective does not occur does not hold. sent10: the congregationalness does not occur. sent11: the trophotropicness does not occur. sent12: the cloistering concern happens. sent13: the inconvenientness occurs. sent14: the inconclusiveness happens. sent15: the polyatomicness does not occur if the stoking doughnut and the non-socioeconomicness happens. sent16: if the cloistering concern happens but the stoking Skaw does not occur the inconclusiveness happens. sent17: the cloistering Pan does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the advocacy happens.; __UNKNOWN__