the quack does not occur and the tinseling grading occurs.
sent1: that the incarnation occurs is not false. sent2: if the ruff does not occur then that the fullbacking does not occur but the incorporating penis happens is not right. sent3: that the incorporating caddie but not the flurrying occurs is false. sent4: that not the quacking but the tinseling grading happens is wrong if the incorporating penis does not occur. sent5: the articulatoriness happens if that the prehistoricness does not occur hold. sent6: the prehistoricness does not occur. sent7: either that the ruff does not occur or that the incorporating chaperon occurs or both is triggered by that the fullback does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the Monophysite happens and the incorporating punster happens is incorrect then the Monophysite does not occur. sent9: if the briefing saffron does not occur then the tinseling grading occurs and the incarnation occurs. sent10: if the incorporating caddie does not occur that both the Monophysiteness and the incorporating punster occurs is not right. sent11: that not the briefing saffron but the articulatoriness happens is caused by the non-prehistoricness. sent12: if the zygomorphicness does not occur then the fact that the postwarness and the articulatoriness occurs is wrong. sent13: the zygomorphicness does not occur if the briefing Bishkek does not occur and the prehistoricness does not occur. sent14: both the incarnation and the briefing saffron occurs if the articulatoriness does not occur. sent15: either the ruff happens or the incorporating chaperon happens or both. sent16: if that the incorporating caddie happens and the flurry does not occur is not true the incorporating caddie does not occur. sent17: if the thunderbolt does not occur then the philandering and/or the incorporating scalpel occurs. sent18: if the ruff does not occur and/or the incorporating chaperon happens then the misappropriation occurs. sent19: the thunderbolt does not occur if the incorporating paddlefish occurs and the briefing rowdiness does not occur. sent20: the briefing Bishkek does not occur and the prehistoricness does not occur if the fact that the hypodermicness happens is true. sent21: that the zygomorphicness but not the postwarness occurs is false. sent22: if the fact that the fact that both the zygomorphicness and the non-postwarness happens is incorrect is not wrong the misappropriation does not occur. sent23: the importantness happens and the briefing Chamaemelum happens. sent24: the fact that the breakdown does not occur if the fact that the breakdown occurs and the dirt happens is incorrect is right. sent25: that the breakdown does not occur causes that the incorporating paddlefish but not the briefing rowdiness happens. sent26: the misappropriation happens if the ruff does not occur. sent27: that the quack occurs and the incorporating penis happens triggers that the fullbacking does not occur. sent28: the incorporating penis happens. sent29: the fact that the breakdown occurs and the dirt happens does not hold if the Monophysiteness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quacking happens.; assump1 & sent28 -> int1: that both the quack and the incorporating penis occurs hold.; int1 & sent27 -> int2: the fullback does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the ruff does not occur and/or the incorporating chaperon happens is not wrong.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the misappropriation occurs.; sent22 & sent21 -> int5: the misappropriation does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the quack does not occur.; sent11 & sent6 -> int8: the briefing saffron does not occur but the articulatoriness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the briefing saffron does not occur.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: both the tinseling grading and the incarnation occurs.; int10 -> int11: that the tinseling grading occurs is correct.; int7 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the quacking does not occur but the tinseling grading occurs is false.
sent16 & sent3 -> int12: the incorporating caddie does not occur.; sent10 & int12 -> int13: that the Monophysiteness happens and the incorporating punster occurs is wrong.; sent8 & int13 -> int14: the Monophysite does not occur.; sent29 & int14 -> int15: that both the breakdown and the dirt occurs is not right.; sent24 & int15 -> int16: the breakdown does not occur.; sent25 & int16 -> int17: the incorporating paddlefish occurs and the briefing rowdiness does not occur.; sent19 & int17 -> int18: the thunderbolt does not occur.; sent17 & int18 -> int19: the philandering and/or the incorporating scalpel occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the quack does not occur and the tinseling grading occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the incarnation occurs is not false. sent2: if the ruff does not occur then that the fullbacking does not occur but the incorporating penis happens is not right. sent3: that the incorporating caddie but not the flurrying occurs is false. sent4: that not the quacking but the tinseling grading happens is wrong if the incorporating penis does not occur. sent5: the articulatoriness happens if that the prehistoricness does not occur hold. sent6: the prehistoricness does not occur. sent7: either that the ruff does not occur or that the incorporating chaperon occurs or both is triggered by that the fullback does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the Monophysite happens and the incorporating punster happens is incorrect then the Monophysite does not occur. sent9: if the briefing saffron does not occur then the tinseling grading occurs and the incarnation occurs. sent10: if the incorporating caddie does not occur that both the Monophysiteness and the incorporating punster occurs is not right. sent11: that not the briefing saffron but the articulatoriness happens is caused by the non-prehistoricness. sent12: if the zygomorphicness does not occur then the fact that the postwarness and the articulatoriness occurs is wrong. sent13: the zygomorphicness does not occur if the briefing Bishkek does not occur and the prehistoricness does not occur. sent14: both the incarnation and the briefing saffron occurs if the articulatoriness does not occur. sent15: either the ruff happens or the incorporating chaperon happens or both. sent16: if that the incorporating caddie happens and the flurry does not occur is not true the incorporating caddie does not occur. sent17: if the thunderbolt does not occur then the philandering and/or the incorporating scalpel occurs. sent18: if the ruff does not occur and/or the incorporating chaperon happens then the misappropriation occurs. sent19: the thunderbolt does not occur if the incorporating paddlefish occurs and the briefing rowdiness does not occur. sent20: the briefing Bishkek does not occur and the prehistoricness does not occur if the fact that the hypodermicness happens is true. sent21: that the zygomorphicness but not the postwarness occurs is false. sent22: if the fact that the fact that both the zygomorphicness and the non-postwarness happens is incorrect is not wrong the misappropriation does not occur. sent23: the importantness happens and the briefing Chamaemelum happens. sent24: the fact that the breakdown does not occur if the fact that the breakdown occurs and the dirt happens is incorrect is right. sent25: that the breakdown does not occur causes that the incorporating paddlefish but not the briefing rowdiness happens. sent26: the misappropriation happens if the ruff does not occur. sent27: that the quack occurs and the incorporating penis happens triggers that the fullbacking does not occur. sent28: the incorporating penis happens. sent29: the fact that the breakdown occurs and the dirt happens does not hold if the Monophysiteness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quacking happens.; assump1 & sent28 -> int1: that both the quack and the incorporating penis occurs hold.; int1 & sent27 -> int2: the fullback does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the ruff does not occur and/or the incorporating chaperon happens is not wrong.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the misappropriation occurs.; sent22 & sent21 -> int5: the misappropriation does not occur.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the quack does not occur.; sent11 & sent6 -> int8: the briefing saffron does not occur but the articulatoriness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the briefing saffron does not occur.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: both the tinseling grading and the incarnation occurs.; int10 -> int11: that the tinseling grading occurs is correct.; int7 & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__