that the scouring groundfish does not occur and the blastodermaticness does not occur if the stonewalling occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the vibrionicness does not occur. sent2: the liquefying Vesuvius happens and the compact occurs. sent3: if both the scouring groundfish and the curtainlessness occurs the stonewalling happens. sent4: the slaving pigment does not occur. sent5: the psychotherapeuticness does not occur if the holiness and the giving happens. sent6: if that the curtainedness and the non-full-timeness occurs is not correct the non-full-time occurs. sent7: the cheep does not occur and the recalculation does not occur. sent8: the stonewalling does not occur if the scouring groundfish and the curtainlessness occurs. sent9: both the curtainlessness and the slaving spurner occurs. sent10: the pureness happens. sent11: the blastodermaticness does not occur. sent12: the receipt happens. sent13: that the slaving pigment does not occur leads to that the slaving spurner happens and the stonewalling happens. sent14: the immortal does not occur and the slaving instroke does not occur. sent15: the cheliferousness and the Hugoesqueness happens. sent16: the chemicalness does not occur. sent17: that the scouring groundfish does not occur and/or the slaving spurner happens prevents that the bestirring Cacicus does not occur. sent18: that the wardenship does not occur hold. sent19: the slaving spurner occurs. sent20: the femoralness does not occur.
sent9 -> int1: the curtainlessness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scouring groundfish happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the scouring groundfish happens and the curtainlessness happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the stonewalling does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stonewalling happens.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the scouring groundfish does not occur.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the scouring groundfish does not occur and the blastodermaticness does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the bestirring Cacicus occurs and the full-timeness occurs.
sent13 & sent4 -> int7: the slaving spurner occurs and the stonewalling occurs.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the slaving spurner occurs is not false.; int8 -> int9: the scouring groundfish does not occur and/or the slaving spurner occurs.; sent17 & int9 -> int10: the bestirring Cacicus occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that the scouring groundfish does not occur and the blastodermaticness does not occur if the stonewalling occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the vibrionicness does not occur. sent2: the liquefying Vesuvius happens and the compact occurs. sent3: if both the scouring groundfish and the curtainlessness occurs the stonewalling happens. sent4: the slaving pigment does not occur. sent5: the psychotherapeuticness does not occur if the holiness and the giving happens. sent6: if that the curtainedness and the non-full-timeness occurs is not correct the non-full-time occurs. sent7: the cheep does not occur and the recalculation does not occur. sent8: the stonewalling does not occur if the scouring groundfish and the curtainlessness occurs. sent9: both the curtainlessness and the slaving spurner occurs. sent10: the pureness happens. sent11: the blastodermaticness does not occur. sent12: the receipt happens. sent13: that the slaving pigment does not occur leads to that the slaving spurner happens and the stonewalling happens. sent14: the immortal does not occur and the slaving instroke does not occur. sent15: the cheliferousness and the Hugoesqueness happens. sent16: the chemicalness does not occur. sent17: that the scouring groundfish does not occur and/or the slaving spurner happens prevents that the bestirring Cacicus does not occur. sent18: that the wardenship does not occur hold. sent19: the slaving spurner occurs. sent20: the femoralness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the curtainlessness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scouring groundfish happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the scouring groundfish happens and the curtainlessness happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the stonewalling does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the stonewalling happens.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the scouring groundfish does not occur.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the scouring groundfish does not occur and the blastodermaticness does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__