the exarch is a PR.
sent1: the goshawk is non-eutrophic. sent2: if the sparkler is sepulchral it is eutrophic. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Pavo. sent4: the helm is Hitlerian if there is something such that that it is both non-dermal and Hitlerian is false. sent5: if something is a tobramycin the fact that it is cerebrovascular is right. sent6: something is not a ROI. sent7: if there is something such that it is a virulence that does not emote redbrush then the sparkler is not eutrophic. sent8: the exarch is firmamental. sent9: the exarch emotes redbrush. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not emote barbital and is a Faisalabad is wrong. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is dermal is not incorrect the exarch is dermal. sent12: if something is a shearwater and it emotes redbrush then the exarch is sepulchral. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is dermal and is not Hitlerian is not true. sent14: if something is not a lard then it drinks Prima. sent15: the sparkler is sepulchral. sent16: if that something is a shearwater is right then the fact that it is a PR hold. sent17: that something is firmamental if that it is a virulence and does not emote redbrush is not correct is not incorrect. sent18: the exarch is a shearwater if something is a kind of firmamental thing that is Hitlerian. sent19: something is a kind of a virulence. sent20: something does not emote sap. sent21: if the helm is not a virulence then it is firmamental. sent22: there is something such that that it is not eutrophic and it is a shearwater is not right. sent23: the fact that the goshawk is not dermal and it is not Hitlerian does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the helm is a virulence that does not emote redbrush.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a virulence and it does not emote redbrush.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the sparkler is not eutrophic.; sent2 & sent15 -> int3: the sparkler is eutrophic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the helm is a virulence and does not emote redbrush is wrong.; sent17 -> int6: if that the helm is a kind of a virulence and does not emote redbrush is not correct then it is firmamental.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the helm is firmamental.; sent23 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is not dermal and it is not Hitlerian does not hold.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the helm is Hitlerian.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the helm is firmamental and is Hitlerian.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is firmamental and is Hitlerian.; int11 & sent18 -> int12: the exarch is a shearwater.; sent16 -> int13: if the fact that the exarch is a shearwater is not wrong it is a kind of a PR.; int12 & int13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the exarch is a PR. ; $context$ = sent1: the goshawk is non-eutrophic. sent2: if the sparkler is sepulchral it is eutrophic. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Pavo. sent4: the helm is Hitlerian if there is something such that that it is both non-dermal and Hitlerian is false. sent5: if something is a tobramycin the fact that it is cerebrovascular is right. sent6: something is not a ROI. sent7: if there is something such that it is a virulence that does not emote redbrush then the sparkler is not eutrophic. sent8: the exarch is firmamental. sent9: the exarch emotes redbrush. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not emote barbital and is a Faisalabad is wrong. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is dermal is not incorrect the exarch is dermal. sent12: if something is a shearwater and it emotes redbrush then the exarch is sepulchral. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it is dermal and is not Hitlerian is not true. sent14: if something is not a lard then it drinks Prima. sent15: the sparkler is sepulchral. sent16: if that something is a shearwater is right then the fact that it is a PR hold. sent17: that something is firmamental if that it is a virulence and does not emote redbrush is not correct is not incorrect. sent18: the exarch is a shearwater if something is a kind of firmamental thing that is Hitlerian. sent19: something is a kind of a virulence. sent20: something does not emote sap. sent21: if the helm is not a virulence then it is firmamental. sent22: there is something such that that it is not eutrophic and it is a shearwater is not right. sent23: the fact that the goshawk is not dermal and it is not Hitlerian does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the helm is a virulence that does not emote redbrush.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a virulence and it does not emote redbrush.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the sparkler is not eutrophic.; sent2 & sent15 -> int3: the sparkler is eutrophic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the helm is a virulence and does not emote redbrush is wrong.; sent17 -> int6: if that the helm is a kind of a virulence and does not emote redbrush is not correct then it is firmamental.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the helm is firmamental.; sent23 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is not dermal and it is not Hitlerian does not hold.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the helm is Hitlerian.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the helm is firmamental and is Hitlerian.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is firmamental and is Hitlerian.; int11 & sent18 -> int12: the exarch is a shearwater.; sent16 -> int13: if the fact that the exarch is a shearwater is not wrong it is a kind of a PR.; int12 & int13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__