the bran is a splashed.
sent1: the Montserratian does glorify. sent2: if the libertarian is gerundial then the bran is not a kind of a splashed and it is not a kind of a leftfield. sent3: the wittol is gerundial. sent4: something is gerundial if it glorifies. sent5: the libertarian is a splashed. sent6: if the wittol glorifies then the fact that the isoflurane is taciturn is right. sent7: that if the libertarian is empirical the libertarian is non-taciturn thing that does slur is not incorrect. sent8: the isoflurane is a slur. sent9: the isoflurane does glorify if the neurogliacyte is gerundial. sent10: the bran is not a splashed if it is gerundial. sent11: the bran is a kind of a splashed if the wittol is taciturn. sent12: if the neurogliacyte does not glorify the isoflurane is gerundial. sent13: the playroom is gerundial. sent14: something glorifies if it is not taciturn. sent15: the fact that something is a slur but it does not glorify is incorrect if it is not taciturn. sent16: the neurogliacyte is a slur. sent17: the bran is taciturn if the wittol is a splashed. sent18: the isoflurane is a kind of a leftfield. sent19: the brewer is gerundial. sent20: if the libertarian is a leftfield the wittol is taciturn. sent21: the wittol is empirical. sent22: that if the libertarian is not taciturn then that the wittol is a kind of a leftfield hold is right. sent23: if something does slur it does not glorify. sent24: if the libertarian is not a kind of a leftfield then the neurogliacyte is gerundial. sent25: if the neurogliacyte does glorify then the libertarian is gerundial and not a leftfield. sent26: if the libertarian is gerundial and is not a kind of a leftfield then the bottom-feeder is not a leftfield.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the libertarian is not a kind of a leftfield.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the neurogliacyte is gerundial.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the isoflurane glorifies is not false.; sent23 -> int3: that the isoflurane does not glorify is not incorrect if that it is a kind of a slur hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the isoflurane does not glorify.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the libertarian is a leftfield.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the wittol is taciturn.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the bottom-feeder is not a kind of a splashed.
sent15 -> int8: if the isoflurane is not taciturn that it slurs and does not glorify does not hold.; sent21 -> int9: there is something such that it is empirical.;
$hypothesis$ = the bran is a splashed. ; $context$ = sent1: the Montserratian does glorify. sent2: if the libertarian is gerundial then the bran is not a kind of a splashed and it is not a kind of a leftfield. sent3: the wittol is gerundial. sent4: something is gerundial if it glorifies. sent5: the libertarian is a splashed. sent6: if the wittol glorifies then the fact that the isoflurane is taciturn is right. sent7: that if the libertarian is empirical the libertarian is non-taciturn thing that does slur is not incorrect. sent8: the isoflurane is a slur. sent9: the isoflurane does glorify if the neurogliacyte is gerundial. sent10: the bran is not a splashed if it is gerundial. sent11: the bran is a kind of a splashed if the wittol is taciturn. sent12: if the neurogliacyte does not glorify the isoflurane is gerundial. sent13: the playroom is gerundial. sent14: something glorifies if it is not taciturn. sent15: the fact that something is a slur but it does not glorify is incorrect if it is not taciturn. sent16: the neurogliacyte is a slur. sent17: the bran is taciturn if the wittol is a splashed. sent18: the isoflurane is a kind of a leftfield. sent19: the brewer is gerundial. sent20: if the libertarian is a leftfield the wittol is taciturn. sent21: the wittol is empirical. sent22: that if the libertarian is not taciturn then that the wittol is a kind of a leftfield hold is right. sent23: if something does slur it does not glorify. sent24: if the libertarian is not a kind of a leftfield then the neurogliacyte is gerundial. sent25: if the neurogliacyte does glorify then the libertarian is gerundial and not a leftfield. sent26: if the libertarian is gerundial and is not a kind of a leftfield then the bottom-feeder is not a leftfield. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the libertarian is not a kind of a leftfield.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the neurogliacyte is gerundial.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: that the isoflurane glorifies is not false.; sent23 -> int3: that the isoflurane does not glorify is not incorrect if that it is a kind of a slur hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the isoflurane does not glorify.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the libertarian is a leftfield.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the wittol is taciturn.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__