that if not the gambit but the dyadicness occurs the adaptiveness does not occur is wrong.
sent1: if the adaptiveness occurs then that the gambit does not occur and the dyadicness occurs is wrong. sent2: the dyadicness occurs. sent3: if that both the non-adaptiveness and the weed happens is not correct then the euphemizing does not occur. sent4: the roughleg does not occur. sent5: that the gambit does not occur and the dyadicness happens is triggered by the adaptiveness. sent6: that the gonadalness does not occur is prevented by that not the pirouette but the galling hugger occurs. sent7: the dusking does not occur if not the junior but the modifiableness occurs. sent8: that the torsion does not occur is prevented by that the variegating reservist does not occur but the stoning occurs. sent9: if that the batholithicness occurs is not false that the about-facing does not occur and the small-capitalizationness happens is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the adaptiveness occurs hold.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the gambit does not occur but the dyadicness occurs is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gambit does not occur and the dyadicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the adaptiveness does not occur is true.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the euphemizing does not occur is true.
$hypothesis$ = that if not the gambit but the dyadicness occurs the adaptiveness does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the adaptiveness occurs then that the gambit does not occur and the dyadicness occurs is wrong. sent2: the dyadicness occurs. sent3: if that both the non-adaptiveness and the weed happens is not correct then the euphemizing does not occur. sent4: the roughleg does not occur. sent5: that the gambit does not occur and the dyadicness happens is triggered by the adaptiveness. sent6: that the gonadalness does not occur is prevented by that not the pirouette but the galling hugger occurs. sent7: the dusking does not occur if not the junior but the modifiableness occurs. sent8: that the torsion does not occur is prevented by that the variegating reservist does not occur but the stoning occurs. sent9: if that the batholithicness occurs is not false that the about-facing does not occur and the small-capitalizationness happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the adaptiveness occurs hold.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the gambit does not occur but the dyadicness occurs is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gambit does not occur and the dyadicness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the adaptiveness does not occur is true.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__