the watermeal does jam kinglet and does promise pimento if the terazosin is not a Gish.
sent1: if the terazosin is a Gish then that the spider is peaty or it is an ethology or both is not true. sent2: if the terazosin is a kind of a Gish the watermeal does jam kinglet and it does promise pimento. sent3: if the spider is nonretractile then that the terazosin is not efficacious but it jams kinglet is false. sent4: if the terazosin is not a kind of a Gish the spider is not peaty. sent5: the octogenarian is not a Gish if there exists something such that the fact that it is inefficacious thing that does jam kinglet is not right. sent6: everything is not thermostatics. sent7: if there is something such that it does not promise pimento then the fact that the spider is nonretractile hold. sent8: the watermeal is retractile. sent9: if that either the spider is peaty or it is a kind of an ethology or both is not correct it is not efficacious. sent10: everything is a kind of a Wac. sent11: if the spider is not efficacious then the watermeal is not efficacious and it is not nonretractile. sent12: if the watermeal is not efficacious and is not nonretractile it jams kinglet. sent13: the TMV is not peaty. sent14: the spider is not peaty. sent15: if the spider is not nonretractile the watermeal jams kinglet and is efficacious. sent16: the watermeal does promise pimento if something jams SIRC. sent17: that if the watermeal is not efficacious and not retractile then the watermeal does jam kinglet is right. sent18: that something does not jam SIRC but it promises pimento is not true if it is paranormal. sent19: something jams SIRC and/or does promise pimento. sent20: the terazosin does jam kinglet. sent21: if that the lotus is not thermostatics but it is a Wac is not incorrect then the coconut is paranormal. sent22: the fact that the spider is either peaty or an ethology or both is false if the terazosin is not a kind of a Gish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the terazosin is not a Gish.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the spider is peaty and/or it is an ethology is not correct.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the spider is not efficacious.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the watermeal is not efficacious and it is not nonretractile.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the watermeal jams kinglet.;
the octogenarian is not a Gish.
sent6 -> int5: the chaplain is not thermostatics.; sent10 -> int6: the chaplain is a Wac.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the chaplain is not thermostatics but it is a Wac.; int7 -> int8: everything is not thermostatics and it is a kind of a Wac.; int8 -> int9: the lotus is a kind of non-thermostatics thing that is a Wac.; int9 & sent21 -> int10: the coconut is paranormal.; sent18 -> int11: if the coconut is paranormal that it does not jam SIRC and it promises pimento does not hold.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the coconut does not jam SIRC but it promises pimento is not right.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it does not jam SIRC and does promise pimento is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the watermeal does jam kinglet and does promise pimento if the terazosin is not a Gish. ; $context$ = sent1: if the terazosin is a Gish then that the spider is peaty or it is an ethology or both is not true. sent2: if the terazosin is a kind of a Gish the watermeal does jam kinglet and it does promise pimento. sent3: if the spider is nonretractile then that the terazosin is not efficacious but it jams kinglet is false. sent4: if the terazosin is not a kind of a Gish the spider is not peaty. sent5: the octogenarian is not a Gish if there exists something such that the fact that it is inefficacious thing that does jam kinglet is not right. sent6: everything is not thermostatics. sent7: if there is something such that it does not promise pimento then the fact that the spider is nonretractile hold. sent8: the watermeal is retractile. sent9: if that either the spider is peaty or it is a kind of an ethology or both is not correct it is not efficacious. sent10: everything is a kind of a Wac. sent11: if the spider is not efficacious then the watermeal is not efficacious and it is not nonretractile. sent12: if the watermeal is not efficacious and is not nonretractile it jams kinglet. sent13: the TMV is not peaty. sent14: the spider is not peaty. sent15: if the spider is not nonretractile the watermeal jams kinglet and is efficacious. sent16: the watermeal does promise pimento if something jams SIRC. sent17: that if the watermeal is not efficacious and not retractile then the watermeal does jam kinglet is right. sent18: that something does not jam SIRC but it promises pimento is not true if it is paranormal. sent19: something jams SIRC and/or does promise pimento. sent20: the terazosin does jam kinglet. sent21: if that the lotus is not thermostatics but it is a Wac is not incorrect then the coconut is paranormal. sent22: the fact that the spider is either peaty or an ethology or both is false if the terazosin is not a kind of a Gish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the terazosin is not a Gish.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the spider is peaty and/or it is an ethology is not correct.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the spider is not efficacious.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the watermeal is not efficacious and it is not nonretractile.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the watermeal jams kinglet.; __UNKNOWN__