the bap pelts and it is unenthusiastic.
sent1: the fact that the siderocyte does not replicate commonality and does not study Ulva is not correct if there is something such that it metabolizes armament. sent2: if there exists something such that it is amphoric then that the mackle does replicate commonality and does not metabolize armament does not hold. sent3: the bap is amphitheatric and it is unenthusiastic. sent4: the bluepoint is not unenthusiastic if that the fact that the siderocyte is not thespian and it is not amphoric is wrong is right. sent5: if something does squire processor then that the novelist is a woodscrew but not unenthusiastic is wrong. sent6: the bluepoint is amphitheatric. sent7: the novelist is not a woodscrew if the ghrelin is a Ceratophyllum and it is a north. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not squire processor and is a woodscrew then the bluepoint does not metabolize armament. sent9: the novelist does squire processor if the fact that the siderocyte does not replicate commonality and it does not study Ulva does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that it does not squire processor and it is a kind of a woodscrew. sent11: if something does metabolize armament the fact that the siderocyte does not study Ulva and is a Ceratophyllum is wrong. sent12: the novelist is not a woodscrew if the ghrelin is both not a Ceratophyllum and a north. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a Polypedatidae. sent14: either the bluepoint is not non-thespian or it is amphoric or both. sent15: if the fact that the siderocyte is not unenthusiastic and does not pelt is false it does not study Ulva. sent16: if there is something such that it metabolizes armament then that the siderocyte does not replicate commonality and does study Ulva is false. sent17: something is lucky if it is not thespian and is not amphoric. sent18: the ghrelin is both not a Ceratophyllum and north. sent19: the bap does pelt if something squires processor and is not a woodscrew. sent20: that something is both non-thespian and not amphoric is false if it metabolizes armament. sent21: the argonaut is a kind of a north if the bluepoint is not a north and does not replicate commonality. sent22: if something is thespian the fact that the bluepoint is not amphoric but it is a north is false. sent23: the novelist squires processor if the siderocyte does study Ulva. sent24: something is not a woodscrew. sent25: the mackle metabolizes armament if the bluepoint is amphoric. sent26: if there is something such that that it is a north is not false the fact that the ghrelin does not metabolize armament and is enthusiastic is incorrect.
sent12 & sent18 -> int1: the novelist is not a woodscrew.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the bap is unenthusiastic hold.;
the argonaut is north and is lucky.
sent10 & sent8 -> int3: that the bluepoint does not metabolize armament is not false.; sent17 -> int4: the argonaut is lucky if it is not thespian and not amphoric.;
$hypothesis$ = the bap pelts and it is unenthusiastic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the siderocyte does not replicate commonality and does not study Ulva is not correct if there is something such that it metabolizes armament. sent2: if there exists something such that it is amphoric then that the mackle does replicate commonality and does not metabolize armament does not hold. sent3: the bap is amphitheatric and it is unenthusiastic. sent4: the bluepoint is not unenthusiastic if that the fact that the siderocyte is not thespian and it is not amphoric is wrong is right. sent5: if something does squire processor then that the novelist is a woodscrew but not unenthusiastic is wrong. sent6: the bluepoint is amphitheatric. sent7: the novelist is not a woodscrew if the ghrelin is a Ceratophyllum and it is a north. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not squire processor and is a woodscrew then the bluepoint does not metabolize armament. sent9: the novelist does squire processor if the fact that the siderocyte does not replicate commonality and it does not study Ulva does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that it does not squire processor and it is a kind of a woodscrew. sent11: if something does metabolize armament the fact that the siderocyte does not study Ulva and is a Ceratophyllum is wrong. sent12: the novelist is not a woodscrew if the ghrelin is both not a Ceratophyllum and a north. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a Polypedatidae. sent14: either the bluepoint is not non-thespian or it is amphoric or both. sent15: if the fact that the siderocyte is not unenthusiastic and does not pelt is false it does not study Ulva. sent16: if there is something such that it metabolizes armament then that the siderocyte does not replicate commonality and does study Ulva is false. sent17: something is lucky if it is not thespian and is not amphoric. sent18: the ghrelin is both not a Ceratophyllum and north. sent19: the bap does pelt if something squires processor and is not a woodscrew. sent20: that something is both non-thespian and not amphoric is false if it metabolizes armament. sent21: the argonaut is a kind of a north if the bluepoint is not a north and does not replicate commonality. sent22: if something is thespian the fact that the bluepoint is not amphoric but it is a north is false. sent23: the novelist squires processor if the siderocyte does study Ulva. sent24: something is not a woodscrew. sent25: the mackle metabolizes armament if the bluepoint is amphoric. sent26: if there is something such that that it is a north is not false the fact that the ghrelin does not metabolize armament and is enthusiastic is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent18 -> int1: the novelist is not a woodscrew.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the bap is unenthusiastic hold.; __UNKNOWN__