the balloonist is not a sourwood.
sent1: something that is not Fahrenheit or immunosuppressive or both is a primacy. sent2: either the balloonist is not a Fahrenheit or it is immunosuppressive or both if something is not a geoduck. sent3: if something is not entomophilous then that it is a primacy that does not encourage does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a geoduck. sent5: the balloonist is not entomophilous. sent6: if the balloonist encourages it is a bellyband. sent7: if something is courteous it is a kind of a sourwood. sent8: something is courteous if that it is a bellyband is true. sent9: if the pseudoephedrine is a Fahrenheit then it is a kind of a geoduck.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: either the balloonist is not a Fahrenheit or it is immunosuppressive or both.; sent1 -> int2: that the balloonist is a kind of a primacy is true if the fact that it is either not Fahrenheit or immunosuppressive or both hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the balloonist is a primacy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the balloonist does not encourage is not incorrect.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the balloonist is a primacy and does not encourage.; sent3 -> int5: if the balloonist is not entomophilous that it is a primacy and does not encourage is false.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the balloonist is a kind of a primacy and does not encourage is wrong.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the balloonist encourages.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the balloonist is a kind of a bellyband.; sent8 -> int10: that the balloonist is not discourteous is not wrong if that it is a kind of a bellyband is correct.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the balloonist is courteous.; sent7 -> int12: if the balloonist is courteous then it is a sourwood.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the pseudoephedrine is a bellyband.
$hypothesis$ = the balloonist is not a sourwood. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not Fahrenheit or immunosuppressive or both is a primacy. sent2: either the balloonist is not a Fahrenheit or it is immunosuppressive or both if something is not a geoduck. sent3: if something is not entomophilous then that it is a primacy that does not encourage does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a geoduck. sent5: the balloonist is not entomophilous. sent6: if the balloonist encourages it is a bellyband. sent7: if something is courteous it is a kind of a sourwood. sent8: something is courteous if that it is a bellyband is true. sent9: if the pseudoephedrine is a Fahrenheit then it is a kind of a geoduck. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: either the balloonist is not a Fahrenheit or it is immunosuppressive or both.; sent1 -> int2: that the balloonist is a kind of a primacy is true if the fact that it is either not Fahrenheit or immunosuppressive or both hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the balloonist is a primacy.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the balloonist does not encourage is not incorrect.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the balloonist is a primacy and does not encourage.; sent3 -> int5: if the balloonist is not entomophilous that it is a primacy and does not encourage is false.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the balloonist is a kind of a primacy and does not encourage is wrong.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the balloonist encourages.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the balloonist is a kind of a bellyband.; sent8 -> int10: that the balloonist is not discourteous is not wrong if that it is a kind of a bellyband is correct.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the balloonist is courteous.; sent7 -> int12: if the balloonist is courteous then it is a sourwood.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__