that the fact that the Liechtensteiner does not reimburse Centropus and does reimburse incorruptibility is not right if the chatterer destains osteopath is not true.
sent1: if the chatterer does destain osteopath the fact that the Liechtensteiner does reimburse Centropus and it reimburses incorruptibility is wrong. sent2: the osteopath does not reimburse Centropus if the fact that the fact that the chatterer is not insensitive and does destain hearth is incorrect hold. sent3: that the mycotoxin is a stewardship and it expatriates is not right. sent4: something that is a systematization is both a lightbulb and not a Mysore. sent5: if the chatterer is insensitive that the osteopath does not reimburse Centropus is right. sent6: that the fact that the chatterer does reimburse Centropus and it is not sensitive is incorrect is not false. sent7: something does destain osteopath if it is not non-chordate. sent8: if something is a kind of a pedal then it is a kind of a systematization. sent9: if there exists something such that it does destain osteopath either the chatterer does destain osteopath or it reimburses incorruptibility or both. sent10: something is not non-chordate if it is a lightbulb. sent11: that that the Liechtensteiner does not reimburse Centropus and reimburses incorruptibility is not wrong is false if the fact that the osteopath does not reimburse Centropus hold. sent12: the fact that the Liechtensteiner reimburses Centropus and does reimburse incorruptibility is not right. sent13: the osteopath pedals if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a pedals and is not a cornstalk is not right. sent14: the fact that the Liechtensteiner does not destain osteopath and does reimburse Centropus is not false if the chatterer does not destain osteopath. sent15: the pate destains osteopath if the chatterer does reimburse incorruptibility. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a pedal and it is not a cornstalk does not hold. sent17: if the chatterer destains osteopath that it is not insensitive and destains hearth does not hold. sent18: the fact that the pate destains osteopath is true if that the chatterer destains osteopath is correct. sent19: that something is not a saurian but it does reimburse Centropus is wrong if that it does destain osteopath hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the chatterer does destain osteopath is not false.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the chatterer is not insensitive but it does destain hearth does not hold.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the osteopath does not reimburse Centropus.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the Liechtensteiner does not reimburse Centropus but it does reimburse incorruptibility does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the pate is not saurian but it does reimburse Centropus is false.
sent19 -> int4: that the pate is not a kind of a saurian but it does reimburse Centropus is not true if it does destain osteopath.; sent7 -> int5: if the osteopath is a kind of a chordate it does destain osteopath.; sent10 -> int6: the osteopath is chordate if it is a kind of a lightbulb.; sent4 -> int7: that the osteopath is a lightbulb and is not a Mysore is true if it is a kind of a systematization.; sent8 -> int8: if the osteopath does pedal then that it is a systematization is not incorrect.; sent16 & sent13 -> int9: the osteopath is not non-pedal.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the osteopath is a systematization.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the osteopath is a lightbulb and is not a Mysore.; int11 -> int12: the osteopath is a lightbulb.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the osteopath is a chordate.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the osteopath does destain osteopath.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it does destain osteopath.; int15 & sent9 -> int16: the chatterer does destain osteopath and/or it reimburses incorruptibility.; int16 & sent18 & sent15 -> int17: that the pate does destain osteopath is correct.; int4 & int17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the Liechtensteiner does not reimburse Centropus and does reimburse incorruptibility is not right if the chatterer destains osteopath is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chatterer does destain osteopath the fact that the Liechtensteiner does reimburse Centropus and it reimburses incorruptibility is wrong. sent2: the osteopath does not reimburse Centropus if the fact that the fact that the chatterer is not insensitive and does destain hearth is incorrect hold. sent3: that the mycotoxin is a stewardship and it expatriates is not right. sent4: something that is a systematization is both a lightbulb and not a Mysore. sent5: if the chatterer is insensitive that the osteopath does not reimburse Centropus is right. sent6: that the fact that the chatterer does reimburse Centropus and it is not sensitive is incorrect is not false. sent7: something does destain osteopath if it is not non-chordate. sent8: if something is a kind of a pedal then it is a kind of a systematization. sent9: if there exists something such that it does destain osteopath either the chatterer does destain osteopath or it reimburses incorruptibility or both. sent10: something is not non-chordate if it is a lightbulb. sent11: that that the Liechtensteiner does not reimburse Centropus and reimburses incorruptibility is not wrong is false if the fact that the osteopath does not reimburse Centropus hold. sent12: the fact that the Liechtensteiner reimburses Centropus and does reimburse incorruptibility is not right. sent13: the osteopath pedals if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a pedals and is not a cornstalk is not right. sent14: the fact that the Liechtensteiner does not destain osteopath and does reimburse Centropus is not false if the chatterer does not destain osteopath. sent15: the pate destains osteopath if the chatterer does reimburse incorruptibility. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a pedal and it is not a cornstalk does not hold. sent17: if the chatterer destains osteopath that it is not insensitive and destains hearth does not hold. sent18: the fact that the pate destains osteopath is true if that the chatterer destains osteopath is correct. sent19: that something is not a saurian but it does reimburse Centropus is wrong if that it does destain osteopath hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the chatterer does destain osteopath is not false.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the chatterer is not insensitive but it does destain hearth does not hold.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the osteopath does not reimburse Centropus.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the Liechtensteiner does not reimburse Centropus but it does reimburse incorruptibility does not hold.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__