the sundial is not a pragmatics.
sent1: the Afro-wig factorizes sundial but it is not a Neoplatonism. sent2: the fact that that the linac is a Kaluga and not a ipecac is not incorrect is incorrect if the Afro-wig is not a Xenopodidae. sent3: something factorizes cinchona if it is not a Scirpus. sent4: if the Afro-wig factorizes sundial but it is not a Neoplatonism then the Winesap is not a Kaluga. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Kaluga then that either the nectar is a ipecac or it is a kind of a Xenopodidae or both is not true. sent6: if the fact that the nectar is a kind of a ipecac and/or it is a Xenopodidae is incorrect then the linac is not a Scirpus. sent7: if the policewoman is uric then the sundial is not a pragmatics. sent8: if that something is a Kaluga but it is not a kind of a ipecac is false then it is not a kind of a Neoplatonism. sent9: the policewoman is not non-uric if the linac does factorize cinchona.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the Winesap is not a Kaluga.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a Kaluga.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the nectar is a ipecac and/or it is a Xenopodidae is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the linac is not a kind of a Scirpus.; sent3 -> int5: if the linac is not a Scirpus it factorizes cinchona.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the linac factorizes cinchona.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the policewoman is uric.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the linac is not a Neoplatonism.
sent8 -> int8: if the fact that that that the linac is a Kaluga but it is not a ipecac is not false is not true is not false then it is not a Neoplatonism.;
$hypothesis$ = the sundial is not a pragmatics. ; $context$ = sent1: the Afro-wig factorizes sundial but it is not a Neoplatonism. sent2: the fact that that the linac is a Kaluga and not a ipecac is not incorrect is incorrect if the Afro-wig is not a Xenopodidae. sent3: something factorizes cinchona if it is not a Scirpus. sent4: if the Afro-wig factorizes sundial but it is not a Neoplatonism then the Winesap is not a Kaluga. sent5: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Kaluga then that either the nectar is a ipecac or it is a kind of a Xenopodidae or both is not true. sent6: if the fact that the nectar is a kind of a ipecac and/or it is a Xenopodidae is incorrect then the linac is not a Scirpus. sent7: if the policewoman is uric then the sundial is not a pragmatics. sent8: if that something is a Kaluga but it is not a kind of a ipecac is false then it is not a kind of a Neoplatonism. sent9: the policewoman is not non-uric if the linac does factorize cinchona. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the Winesap is not a Kaluga.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a Kaluga.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the fact that the nectar is a ipecac and/or it is a Xenopodidae is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the linac is not a kind of a Scirpus.; sent3 -> int5: if the linac is not a Scirpus it factorizes cinchona.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the linac factorizes cinchona.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the policewoman is uric.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__