the fact that the iproclozide is both not praetorian and not fair is wrong.
sent1: something is not a distraction if it does not interpose collection and is a achievability. sent2: if the Armenian is a kind of a gook and/or it is not a palfrey the knacker is operationalist. sent3: the Armenian is a kind of a gook or it is not a kind of a palfrey or both. sent4: something does not interpose collection if it is a garboard. sent5: everything is a achievability and it does curb shaded. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a garboard hold if it is a kind of a patchiness. sent7: if the knacker is operationalist then that the deserter is a patchiness is right. sent8: if the deserter is not a distraction then that the iproclozide is not praetorian and it is not fair is wrong.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the knacker is operationalist.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the deserter is a kind of a patchiness.; sent6 -> int3: the deserter is a kind of a garboard if that it is a patchiness is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the deserter is a garboard.; sent4 -> int5: if the deserter is a kind of a garboard it does not interpose collection.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the deserter does not interpose collection.; sent5 -> int7: the deserter is a achievability and it curbs shaded.; int7 -> int8: the deserter is a achievability.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the deserter does not interpose collection and is a achievability.; sent1 -> int10: if the deserter does not interpose collection but it is a achievability the fact that it is not a distraction is not incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the deserter is not a distraction.; int11 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the iproclozide is both not praetorian and not fair is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a distraction if it does not interpose collection and is a achievability. sent2: if the Armenian is a kind of a gook and/or it is not a palfrey the knacker is operationalist. sent3: the Armenian is a kind of a gook or it is not a kind of a palfrey or both. sent4: something does not interpose collection if it is a garboard. sent5: everything is a achievability and it does curb shaded. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of a garboard hold if it is a kind of a patchiness. sent7: if the knacker is operationalist then that the deserter is a patchiness is right. sent8: if the deserter is not a distraction then that the iproclozide is not praetorian and it is not fair is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the knacker is operationalist.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the deserter is a kind of a patchiness.; sent6 -> int3: the deserter is a kind of a garboard if that it is a patchiness is not wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the deserter is a garboard.; sent4 -> int5: if the deserter is a kind of a garboard it does not interpose collection.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the deserter does not interpose collection.; sent5 -> int7: the deserter is a achievability and it curbs shaded.; int7 -> int8: the deserter is a achievability.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the deserter does not interpose collection and is a achievability.; sent1 -> int10: if the deserter does not interpose collection but it is a achievability the fact that it is not a distraction is not incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the deserter is not a distraction.; int11 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__