the marmoset does not rear primus.
sent1: if that something does not delineate or it does not rear primus or both does not hold then it is Procrustean. sent2: the conformation weaves hypocrite and is a craniology. sent3: the fact that either something does not delineate or it does not rear primus or both is incorrect if it does not butt hornbook. sent4: the throughput is not a oviduct. sent5: if the marmoset rears primus that the poncho does not weave telegraph and does rear pterion is not correct. sent6: if that something delineates is not incorrect it rears primus. sent7: if the fact that the poncho delineates is right the mica rears mica and/or it does not butt hornbook. sent8: if the fact that something does not weave telegraph and rears pterion is incorrect then that it does delineate hold. sent9: if something does weave hypocrite then that the throughput is a oviduct and/or it is not trabecular is wrong. sent10: if that the throughput is a oviduct or not trabecular or both does not hold then the fact that the wheat is a oviduct hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the marmoset rears primus.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the poncho does not weave telegraph but it does rear pterion does not hold.; sent8 -> int2: the poncho delineates if that it does not weave telegraph and rears pterion is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the poncho does delineate.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the mica rears mica or does not butt hornbook or both.; sent2 -> int5: the conformation does weave hypocrite.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it weaves hypocrite.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: that the throughput is a oviduct or it is not trabecular or both is wrong.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the wheat is a oviduct is not incorrect.;
the marmoset rears primus.
sent6 -> int9: the marmoset does rear primus if it delineates.;
$hypothesis$ = the marmoset does not rear primus. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does not delineate or it does not rear primus or both does not hold then it is Procrustean. sent2: the conformation weaves hypocrite and is a craniology. sent3: the fact that either something does not delineate or it does not rear primus or both is incorrect if it does not butt hornbook. sent4: the throughput is not a oviduct. sent5: if the marmoset rears primus that the poncho does not weave telegraph and does rear pterion is not correct. sent6: if that something delineates is not incorrect it rears primus. sent7: if the fact that the poncho delineates is right the mica rears mica and/or it does not butt hornbook. sent8: if the fact that something does not weave telegraph and rears pterion is incorrect then that it does delineate hold. sent9: if something does weave hypocrite then that the throughput is a oviduct and/or it is not trabecular is wrong. sent10: if that the throughput is a oviduct or not trabecular or both does not hold then the fact that the wheat is a oviduct hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the marmoset rears primus.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the poncho does not weave telegraph but it does rear pterion does not hold.; sent8 -> int2: the poncho delineates if that it does not weave telegraph and rears pterion is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the poncho does delineate.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the mica rears mica or does not butt hornbook or both.; sent2 -> int5: the conformation does weave hypocrite.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it weaves hypocrite.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: that the throughput is a oviduct or it is not trabecular or both is wrong.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the wheat is a oviduct is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__