the wheeze does remodel jacksmelt and it is inclement.
sent1: the smoke is not a kind of a siding if it is not sturdy. sent2: the grave is a Handel and it is inclement. sent3: if something does emulsify Greenland it remodels jacksmelt. sent4: there is something such that that it does emulsify Greenland and is a sneer is wrong. sent5: that the amputator is not a kind of a sneer and it does not emulsify Greenland is false. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it emulsifies Greenland and sneers is not correct then the amputator does not emulsifies Greenland. sent7: the wheeze emulsifies elitist and is a production. sent8: the wheeze is not a kind of a fob. sent9: the wheeze is not a kind of a siding. sent10: if the wheeze is sturdy it does emulsify Greenland. sent11: the stonecrop is not inclement. sent12: that if the pousse-cafe is the jollity then that the pousse-cafe emulsifies Greenland is not incorrect is not wrong. sent13: the wheeze is sturdy if it is not a siding. sent14: the wheeze is inclement.
sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the wheeze is sturdy.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the wheeze does emulsify Greenland is not wrong.; sent3 -> int3: if the fact that the wheeze does emulsify Greenland is correct the fact that it does remodel jacksmelt is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wheeze remodels jacksmelt hold.; int4 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
that the wheeze does remodel jacksmelt and it is inclement is not correct.
sent5 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a sneer and does not emulsify Greenland is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the wheeze does remodel jacksmelt and it is inclement. ; $context$ = sent1: the smoke is not a kind of a siding if it is not sturdy. sent2: the grave is a Handel and it is inclement. sent3: if something does emulsify Greenland it remodels jacksmelt. sent4: there is something such that that it does emulsify Greenland and is a sneer is wrong. sent5: that the amputator is not a kind of a sneer and it does not emulsify Greenland is false. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it emulsifies Greenland and sneers is not correct then the amputator does not emulsifies Greenland. sent7: the wheeze emulsifies elitist and is a production. sent8: the wheeze is not a kind of a fob. sent9: the wheeze is not a kind of a siding. sent10: if the wheeze is sturdy it does emulsify Greenland. sent11: the stonecrop is not inclement. sent12: that if the pousse-cafe is the jollity then that the pousse-cafe emulsifies Greenland is not incorrect is not wrong. sent13: the wheeze is sturdy if it is not a siding. sent14: the wheeze is inclement. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the wheeze is sturdy.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the wheeze does emulsify Greenland is not wrong.; sent3 -> int3: if the fact that the wheeze does emulsify Greenland is correct the fact that it does remodel jacksmelt is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wheeze remodels jacksmelt hold.; int4 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__