the aroidness does not occur but the casing Swede happens.
sent1: if the adoration does not occur the aroidness does not occur but the flattening Erianthus occurs. sent2: that the flattening Erianthus and the adoration occurs causes that the flotation does not occur. sent3: the fact that the azoness does not occur but the lumbarness happens is not right. sent4: that the adoration does not occur is brought about by that the non-lumbarness and the realizing happens. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the turfing citrus happens and the casing rangpur does not occur is incorrect is not false then the casing Swede happens. sent6: if the subhumanness does not occur then the uniovularness occurs. sent7: that the tactfulness happens and the adoration occurs is triggered by that the realizing does not occur. sent8: that the casing rangpur happens results in that the turfing citrus does not occur. sent9: that the casing rangpur does not occur prevents that the flattening Erianthus does not occur. sent10: the patientness happens. sent11: if that the flotation does not occur hold that the aroidness does not occur but the casing Swede happens is incorrect. sent12: if the fact that that not the azoness but the lumbarness happens is wrong is not wrong the realizing does not occur. sent13: the azoness and the resorting happens if the redistribution does not occur. sent14: the turfing citrus happens. sent15: the lumbarness does not occur and the realizing occurs if the azoness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the casing rangpur happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the turfing citrus does not occur.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the casing rangpur does not occur hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the flattening Erianthus happens.; sent12 & sent3 -> int5: that the realizing does not occur is correct.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the tactfulness happens and the adoration occurs.; int6 -> int7: that the adoration happens is correct.; int4 & int7 -> int8: both the flattening Erianthus and the adoration occurs.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the flotation does not occur.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the non-aroidness and the casing Swede happens.
$hypothesis$ = the aroidness does not occur but the casing Swede happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the adoration does not occur the aroidness does not occur but the flattening Erianthus occurs. sent2: that the flattening Erianthus and the adoration occurs causes that the flotation does not occur. sent3: the fact that the azoness does not occur but the lumbarness happens is not right. sent4: that the adoration does not occur is brought about by that the non-lumbarness and the realizing happens. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the turfing citrus happens and the casing rangpur does not occur is incorrect is not false then the casing Swede happens. sent6: if the subhumanness does not occur then the uniovularness occurs. sent7: that the tactfulness happens and the adoration occurs is triggered by that the realizing does not occur. sent8: that the casing rangpur happens results in that the turfing citrus does not occur. sent9: that the casing rangpur does not occur prevents that the flattening Erianthus does not occur. sent10: the patientness happens. sent11: if that the flotation does not occur hold that the aroidness does not occur but the casing Swede happens is incorrect. sent12: if the fact that that not the azoness but the lumbarness happens is wrong is not wrong the realizing does not occur. sent13: the azoness and the resorting happens if the redistribution does not occur. sent14: the turfing citrus happens. sent15: the lumbarness does not occur and the realizing occurs if the azoness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the casing rangpur happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the turfing citrus does not occur.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the casing rangpur does not occur hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the flattening Erianthus happens.; sent12 & sent3 -> int5: that the realizing does not occur is correct.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the tactfulness happens and the adoration occurs.; int6 -> int7: that the adoration happens is correct.; int4 & int7 -> int8: both the flattening Erianthus and the adoration occurs.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the flotation does not occur.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__