that the Bovril is not a mist and it does not heel lowercase if the clip is a Homer is wrong.
sent1: either the vanity is a pictorial or it does not heel saint or both. sent2: if the clip does not heel civet the fact that that the vanity is a pictorial and/or does not heel saint hold is wrong. sent3: the clip is not a Homer if that the vanity does not border enkephalin and heels lowercase does not hold. sent4: the fact that something does not border enkephalin and does heel lowercase is false if it is not Kiplingesque. sent5: if the clip does not heel lowercase then the Bovril is not a snowfield and does not heel civet. sent6: if something does not heel civet then it is not a mist and does not detrain Agamemnon. sent7: the enkephalin is not a kind of a snowfield if something is a Homer and it does heel civet. sent8: the Bovril does not mist and it does not heel lowercase if the enkephalin is not a snowfield.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clip does not heel civet.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the vanity is a pictorial or it does not heel saint or both does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the clip heels civet is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the clip is a kind of a Homer.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: the clip is a Homer that heels civet.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Homer that does heel civet hold.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the enkephalin is not a snowfield.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Bovril does not mist and it does not heel lowercase.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Bovril is not a mist and does not detrain Agamemnon.
sent6 -> int8: the Bovril is not a mist and it does not detrain Agamemnon if it does not heel civet.; sent4 -> int9: if that the enkephalin is not Kiplingesque is true the fact that the fact that it does not border enkephalin and heels lowercase hold is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Bovril is not a mist and it does not heel lowercase if the clip is a Homer is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: either the vanity is a pictorial or it does not heel saint or both. sent2: if the clip does not heel civet the fact that that the vanity is a pictorial and/or does not heel saint hold is wrong. sent3: the clip is not a Homer if that the vanity does not border enkephalin and heels lowercase does not hold. sent4: the fact that something does not border enkephalin and does heel lowercase is false if it is not Kiplingesque. sent5: if the clip does not heel lowercase then the Bovril is not a snowfield and does not heel civet. sent6: if something does not heel civet then it is not a mist and does not detrain Agamemnon. sent7: the enkephalin is not a kind of a snowfield if something is a Homer and it does heel civet. sent8: the Bovril does not mist and it does not heel lowercase if the enkephalin is not a snowfield. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clip does not heel civet.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that either the vanity is a pictorial or it does not heel saint or both does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the clip heels civet is not false.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the clip is a kind of a Homer.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: the clip is a Homer that heels civet.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Homer that does heel civet hold.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the enkephalin is not a snowfield.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the Bovril does not mist and it does not heel lowercase.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__