the fact that if the singeing happens the fact that the blackmailing pub occurs and the punishment does not occur is false is not right.
sent1: the fact that the blackmailing pub and the punishment occurs does not hold if the singeing occurs. sent2: the fact that the singeing happens is not incorrect if the sub-test does not occur and the blackmailing pub occurs. sent3: that the sub-test does not occur is correct. sent4: that the arthrosporicness does not occur is correct. sent5: the fact that the fact that the blackmailing pub happens and the punishment occurs is correct does not hold. sent6: the punishment does not occur. sent7: that the blackmailing pub but not the punishment happens is brought about by the singeing. sent8: the singeing does not occur if that not the sub-test but the blackmailing pub happens hold. sent9: that the squinching exchanger happens and/or that the blackmailing autotomy happens is caused by the non-technologicalness. sent10: the technologicalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the singeing occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the blackmailing pub but not the punishment occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the blackmailing pub happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: not the sub-test but the blackmailing pub occurs.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the singeing does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the blackmailing pub but not the punishment occurs is not correct.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the alopecicness occurs and the cotillion does not occur.
sent9 & sent10 -> int6: the squinching exchanger and/or the blackmailing autotomy happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the singeing happens the fact that the blackmailing pub occurs and the punishment does not occur is false is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the blackmailing pub and the punishment occurs does not hold if the singeing occurs. sent2: the fact that the singeing happens is not incorrect if the sub-test does not occur and the blackmailing pub occurs. sent3: that the sub-test does not occur is correct. sent4: that the arthrosporicness does not occur is correct. sent5: the fact that the fact that the blackmailing pub happens and the punishment occurs is correct does not hold. sent6: the punishment does not occur. sent7: that the blackmailing pub but not the punishment happens is brought about by the singeing. sent8: the singeing does not occur if that not the sub-test but the blackmailing pub happens hold. sent9: that the squinching exchanger happens and/or that the blackmailing autotomy happens is caused by the non-technologicalness. sent10: the technologicalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the singeing occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the blackmailing pub but not the punishment occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the blackmailing pub happens.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: not the sub-test but the blackmailing pub occurs.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the singeing does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the blackmailing pub but not the punishment occurs is not correct.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__