the chincapin is a Salinger.
sent1: that the chincapin is not a happiness is correct. sent2: if the compound is not a Salinger then that the chincapin is a Salinger and it is a kind of a happiness is incorrect. sent3: the shuttlecock is not a happiness if there are caruncular things. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is caruncular hold the compound is not a happiness and it is not ascitic. sent5: that the shuttlecock is not a kind of a happiness is true if there exists something such that it is ascitic. sent6: the playbox is not areal and it is not caruncular. sent7: the compound is not caruncular and it is not a happiness if something is a communist. sent8: if the fact that the shuttlecock is a kind of non-caruncular a Salinger is incorrect the chincapin is not a kind of a happiness. sent9: the fact that the shuttlecock is non-ascitic but it is a happiness does not hold. sent10: the fact that the compound is not a happiness but ascitic is wrong. sent11: there are communist things. sent12: the fact that that the shuttlecock is a kind of non-caruncular thing that is ascitic is not wrong is not right if the compound is not non-caruncular. sent13: if the fact that the shuttlecock is not caruncular but it is ascitic is not correct the chincapin is not a kind of a Salinger. sent14: if the compound is caruncular that the shuttlecock is not a kind of a happiness is not incorrect. sent15: the fact that the compound is a happiness and ascitic does not hold.
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the compound is not caruncular and not a happiness.; int1 -> int2: the compound is not caruncular.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: that the shuttlecock is not caruncular but it is ascitic is incorrect.; sent13 & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the chincapin is a Salinger. ; $context$ = sent1: that the chincapin is not a happiness is correct. sent2: if the compound is not a Salinger then that the chincapin is a Salinger and it is a kind of a happiness is incorrect. sent3: the shuttlecock is not a happiness if there are caruncular things. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is caruncular hold the compound is not a happiness and it is not ascitic. sent5: that the shuttlecock is not a kind of a happiness is true if there exists something such that it is ascitic. sent6: the playbox is not areal and it is not caruncular. sent7: the compound is not caruncular and it is not a happiness if something is a communist. sent8: if the fact that the shuttlecock is a kind of non-caruncular a Salinger is incorrect the chincapin is not a kind of a happiness. sent9: the fact that the shuttlecock is non-ascitic but it is a happiness does not hold. sent10: the fact that the compound is not a happiness but ascitic is wrong. sent11: there are communist things. sent12: the fact that that the shuttlecock is a kind of non-caruncular thing that is ascitic is not wrong is not right if the compound is not non-caruncular. sent13: if the fact that the shuttlecock is not caruncular but it is ascitic is not correct the chincapin is not a kind of a Salinger. sent14: if the compound is caruncular that the shuttlecock is not a kind of a happiness is not incorrect. sent15: the fact that the compound is a happiness and ascitic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the compound is not caruncular and not a happiness.; int1 -> int2: the compound is not caruncular.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: that the shuttlecock is not caruncular but it is ascitic is incorrect.; sent13 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__