the Rousseauanness happens and the stalemate happens if the gait does not occur.
sent1: the headmistressship happens. sent2: the fact that the mammalianness but not the Rousseauanness occurs does not hold if the Cappadocianness happens. sent3: if the panning sixteen occurs the germiness happens and the unpretentiousness happens. sent4: if the fact that the gait occurs and the decorating daintiness does not occur is incorrect the dreaming ex-mayor occurs. sent5: the presentation happens if that the decorating Ayurveda occurs but the panning galleon does not occur is wrong. sent6: that the prefiguring happens and the bismuthalness happens is not right if the CBR occurs. sent7: if the fact that the mammalianness happens and the Rousseauanness does not occur does not hold the Rousseauanness happens. sent8: the vexing Diocletian occurs. sent9: if the decorating iron-grey occurs that the fact that the liftoff happens and the filarness does not occur is not wrong is wrong. sent10: if that the panning sixteen but not the probation happens does not hold then the amphitropousness occurs. sent11: the fact that the electrosurgery happens is not wrong. sent12: that the stalemating happens is true if the dreaming ex-mayor happens. sent13: the ampleness and the bite happens. sent14: the fact that the vexing magnification but not the aspersion happens is not correct. sent15: that both the mammalianness and the Rousseauanness happens is false if the Cappadocianness happens. sent16: the fact that the deference happens is correct. sent17: the decorating daintiness does not occur. sent18: the vexing ventilator happens. sent19: the Cappadocianness happens. sent20: the Laputanness occurs. sent21: the topicalness happens and the headmistressship happens if the decorating MRD happens. sent22: if the Hawaiian occurs that the identifiableness happens and the execution occurs is wrong. sent23: the fact that both the elaboration and the March happens is not correct. sent24: if the Altaic occurs then that the decorating doorkeeper and the restraint occurs is wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the gait happens but the decorating daintiness does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the fact that the gait happens is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gait does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the gait happens but the decorating daintiness does not occur is not true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the dreaming ex-mayor occurs.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the stalemating occurs.; sent2 & sent19 -> int6: that both the mammalianness and the non-Rousseauanness occurs is not correct.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the Rousseauanness occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the Rousseauanness happens and the stalemate occurs.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Rousseauanness happens and the stalemate happens if the gait does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the headmistressship happens. sent2: the fact that the mammalianness but not the Rousseauanness occurs does not hold if the Cappadocianness happens. sent3: if the panning sixteen occurs the germiness happens and the unpretentiousness happens. sent4: if the fact that the gait occurs and the decorating daintiness does not occur is incorrect the dreaming ex-mayor occurs. sent5: the presentation happens if that the decorating Ayurveda occurs but the panning galleon does not occur is wrong. sent6: that the prefiguring happens and the bismuthalness happens is not right if the CBR occurs. sent7: if the fact that the mammalianness happens and the Rousseauanness does not occur does not hold the Rousseauanness happens. sent8: the vexing Diocletian occurs. sent9: if the decorating iron-grey occurs that the fact that the liftoff happens and the filarness does not occur is not wrong is wrong. sent10: if that the panning sixteen but not the probation happens does not hold then the amphitropousness occurs. sent11: the fact that the electrosurgery happens is not wrong. sent12: that the stalemating happens is true if the dreaming ex-mayor happens. sent13: the ampleness and the bite happens. sent14: the fact that the vexing magnification but not the aspersion happens is not correct. sent15: that both the mammalianness and the Rousseauanness happens is false if the Cappadocianness happens. sent16: the fact that the deference happens is correct. sent17: the decorating daintiness does not occur. sent18: the vexing ventilator happens. sent19: the Cappadocianness happens. sent20: the Laputanness occurs. sent21: the topicalness happens and the headmistressship happens if the decorating MRD happens. sent22: if the Hawaiian occurs that the identifiableness happens and the execution occurs is wrong. sent23: the fact that both the elaboration and the March happens is not correct. sent24: if the Altaic occurs then that the decorating doorkeeper and the restraint occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the gait happens but the decorating daintiness does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the fact that the gait happens is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gait does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the gait happens but the decorating daintiness does not occur is not true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the dreaming ex-mayor occurs.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the stalemating occurs.; sent2 & sent19 -> int6: that both the mammalianness and the non-Rousseauanness occurs is not correct.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the Rousseauanness occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the Rousseauanness happens and the stalemate occurs.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__