that there is something such that if it does not report freshman and it does tarnish then the fact that it is a kind of a Shona is correct is false.
sent1: if the trend-setter does not tarnish but it reports Sherman then it negotiates branch. sent2: the trend-setter does negotiate unbelief if it is not a tarnish and does truckle. sent3: there is something such that if it reports freshman and does tarnish then the fact that it is a Shona is not wrong. sent4: something negotiates LISP if it does not report motherhood and it is a kind of a tarnish. sent5: the trend-setter is a kind of a Shona if it does not report freshman and it is a tarnish. sent6: the trend-setter does report IDP if it reports fin and is praetorian. sent7: if the trend-setter does report freshman and it is a tarnish it is Shona. sent8: if something that is not a kind of a langsyne beholds assignment then it is a columbarium. sent9: that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a commensalism and it is a suburb then it is impractical is correct. sent10: if the botfly does not report freshman but it does report Thomson the fact that it is a roar is true. sent11: the propanolol is intentional if it is a kind of a Shona and it is a sprinkler. sent12: there exists something such that if it is non-Hindu thing that is intolerable it reports Thomson. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not believe baddeleyite and it is a bottomed that it is declarative hold.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
that there exists something such that if it is not a langsyne and beholds assignment then it is a columbarium is not incorrect.
sent8 -> int1: the freshman is a columbarium if it is not a langsyne and it does behold assignment.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not report freshman and it does tarnish then the fact that it is a kind of a Shona is correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the trend-setter does not tarnish but it reports Sherman then it negotiates branch. sent2: the trend-setter does negotiate unbelief if it is not a tarnish and does truckle. sent3: there is something such that if it reports freshman and does tarnish then the fact that it is a Shona is not wrong. sent4: something negotiates LISP if it does not report motherhood and it is a kind of a tarnish. sent5: the trend-setter is a kind of a Shona if it does not report freshman and it is a tarnish. sent6: the trend-setter does report IDP if it reports fin and is praetorian. sent7: if the trend-setter does report freshman and it is a tarnish it is Shona. sent8: if something that is not a kind of a langsyne beholds assignment then it is a columbarium. sent9: that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a commensalism and it is a suburb then it is impractical is correct. sent10: if the botfly does not report freshman but it does report Thomson the fact that it is a roar is true. sent11: the propanolol is intentional if it is a kind of a Shona and it is a sprinkler. sent12: there exists something such that if it is non-Hindu thing that is intolerable it reports Thomson. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not believe baddeleyite and it is a bottomed that it is declarative hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__