the snorter does not invest noradrenaline.
sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a slap that is healthful does not hold if it does not invest noradrenaline. sent2: there exists nothing such that it is a cab and it does not designate. sent3: if the fact that the Raffia does not designate and does not tabulate detour does not hold it is not a lapidary. sent4: the fact that the Raffia does not tabulate detour hold if the fact that it is not a cab and does not designate is not true. sent5: that the ovolo invests noradrenaline is not false. sent6: the snorter is a slap if the noradrenaline is a kind of a lapidary. sent7: if the fact that something is a slap and it is healthful is not right then it is not healthful. sent8: something does invest noradrenaline if it slaps. sent9: if the Raffia does not tabulate detour then the ovolo is healthful and/or does tabulate detour. sent10: that the noradrenaline either does slap or is healthful or both does not hold if it does not fathom. sent11: if the ovolo does tabulate detour the noradrenaline is a kind of a lapidary. sent12: the fact that the Raffia is a cab but it does not designate does not hold. sent13: there exists nothing such that it is not a cab and does not designate. sent14: that the Raffia does not tabulate detour hold if it is a cab. sent15: if the ovolo is healthful then the noradrenaline is a lapidary. sent16: if that the ovolo is a kind of non-lapidary thing that does tabulate detour is not true the picker is not a kind of a cab.
sent13 -> int1: the fact that the Raffia is not a cab and it does not designate is false.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Raffia does not tabulate detour.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the ovolo is healthful and/or it tabulates detour.; int3 & sent15 & sent11 -> int4: the noradrenaline is lapidary.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the snorter does slap.; sent8 -> int6: if the snorter is a slap then it invests noradrenaline.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the snorter does not invest noradrenaline.
$hypothesis$ = the snorter does not invest noradrenaline. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a kind of a slap that is healthful does not hold if it does not invest noradrenaline. sent2: there exists nothing such that it is a cab and it does not designate. sent3: if the fact that the Raffia does not designate and does not tabulate detour does not hold it is not a lapidary. sent4: the fact that the Raffia does not tabulate detour hold if the fact that it is not a cab and does not designate is not true. sent5: that the ovolo invests noradrenaline is not false. sent6: the snorter is a slap if the noradrenaline is a kind of a lapidary. sent7: if the fact that something is a slap and it is healthful is not right then it is not healthful. sent8: something does invest noradrenaline if it slaps. sent9: if the Raffia does not tabulate detour then the ovolo is healthful and/or does tabulate detour. sent10: that the noradrenaline either does slap or is healthful or both does not hold if it does not fathom. sent11: if the ovolo does tabulate detour the noradrenaline is a kind of a lapidary. sent12: the fact that the Raffia is a cab but it does not designate does not hold. sent13: there exists nothing such that it is not a cab and does not designate. sent14: that the Raffia does not tabulate detour hold if it is a cab. sent15: if the ovolo is healthful then the noradrenaline is a lapidary. sent16: if that the ovolo is a kind of non-lapidary thing that does tabulate detour is not true the picker is not a kind of a cab. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the fact that the Raffia is not a cab and it does not designate is false.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Raffia does not tabulate detour.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the ovolo is healthful and/or it tabulates detour.; int3 & sent15 & sent11 -> int4: the noradrenaline is lapidary.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the snorter does slap.; sent8 -> int6: if the snorter is a slap then it invests noradrenaline.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__