the mesocolon is not a kind of a valuation.
sent1: something is not commons and it is not a reinforcer if it samples scud. sent2: if something that is unresponsive is cacodemonic then it does not sample scud. sent3: the horse-pistol does not exalt Talinum or it is a bethel or both if it does perceive triamcinolone. sent4: that the easterner is commons hold if it does not perceive triamcinolone. sent5: the mesocolon is a valuation if the fact that the easterner is a bethel is right. sent6: something is a bethel if the fact that it is commons is not false. sent7: the easterner is unresponsive and it is cacodemonic. sent8: the fact that the fact that the mesocolon is not a reinforcer but it samples scud is wrong is not incorrect if the stile does not exalt Talinum. sent9: something is not a kind of a valuation if the fact that it is not a reinforcer and does sample scud does not hold. sent10: the fact that if the easterner does not sample scud then the fact that the easterner is not a reinforcer but it exalts Talinum is incorrect is not incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the easterner is not a kind of a reinforcer and does exalt Talinum is false then it does not perceive triamcinolone. sent12: if the fact that something does not exalt Talinum hold then it does sample scud. sent13: the mesocolon is cacodemonic if the easterner is a valuation.
sent2 -> int1: the easterner does not sample scud if that it is unresponsive and it is cacodemonic is not wrong.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the easterner does not sample scud.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that that the easterner is not a reinforcer and exalts Talinum is not false does not hold.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the easterner does not perceive triamcinolone.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the easterner is commons.; sent6 -> int6: the easterner is a bethel if the fact that it is commons is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the easterner is a bethel.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the mesocolon is not a valuation.
sent9 -> int8: the mesocolon is not a valuation if the fact that it is not a reinforcer and samples scud is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the mesocolon is not a kind of a valuation. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not commons and it is not a reinforcer if it samples scud. sent2: if something that is unresponsive is cacodemonic then it does not sample scud. sent3: the horse-pistol does not exalt Talinum or it is a bethel or both if it does perceive triamcinolone. sent4: that the easterner is commons hold if it does not perceive triamcinolone. sent5: the mesocolon is a valuation if the fact that the easterner is a bethel is right. sent6: something is a bethel if the fact that it is commons is not false. sent7: the easterner is unresponsive and it is cacodemonic. sent8: the fact that the fact that the mesocolon is not a reinforcer but it samples scud is wrong is not incorrect if the stile does not exalt Talinum. sent9: something is not a kind of a valuation if the fact that it is not a reinforcer and does sample scud does not hold. sent10: the fact that if the easterner does not sample scud then the fact that the easterner is not a reinforcer but it exalts Talinum is incorrect is not incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the easterner is not a kind of a reinforcer and does exalt Talinum is false then it does not perceive triamcinolone. sent12: if the fact that something does not exalt Talinum hold then it does sample scud. sent13: the mesocolon is cacodemonic if the easterner is a valuation. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the easterner does not sample scud if that it is unresponsive and it is cacodemonic is not wrong.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the easterner does not sample scud.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that that the easterner is not a reinforcer and exalts Talinum is not false does not hold.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the easterner does not perceive triamcinolone.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the easterner is commons.; sent6 -> int6: the easterner is a bethel if the fact that it is commons is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the easterner is a bethel.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__