that the quitting triggers that the mystifying Kandy occurs and the untidiness does not occur is not right.
sent1: the spiel does not occur. sent2: if that the aeration does not occur hold the fact that the display and/or the effects happens hold. sent3: the mystifying Kandy is caused by the effects. sent4: the volley happens. sent5: if the baiting occurs the universalisticness occurs. sent6: the entrenching prescriptivism happens but the tillage does not occur. sent7: if the effusion does not occur then the wresting engagement does not occur. sent8: the astrologicalness does not occur. sent9: the councillorship does not occur if the flowerlessness does not occur. sent10: the jumbling happens if the mystifying kilohertz occurs. sent11: the mystifying Kandy is triggered by that the displaying occurs. sent12: the aeration does not occur. sent13: the indelicateness occurs. sent14: the bastinadoing does not occur if the quitting and the non-untidiness happens. sent15: if the fact that the volley happens hold then the councillorship happens. sent16: the stick happens and/or the dinging happens. sent17: that both the untidiness and the quitting occurs causes the floweringness. sent18: if the bibliophilicness does not occur then the effusion does not occur. sent19: if the aniseikonicness occurs then the shimmering and the non-isothermicness occurs. sent20: if the awarding happens and the unenthusiasticness occurs then the melioration does not occur. sent21: if that the wresting supplejack does not occur is not wrong then the seaworthiness or the astigmaticness or both occurs. sent22: the blip occurs if that the localization occurs is right. sent23: the house but not the wresting roentgen happens. sent24: the fact that the weatherliness happens is not false. sent25: the wresting throw-weight happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the untidiness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the quitting occurs.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the untidiness happens and the quitting occurs.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the flowerlessness does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the councillorship does not occur.; sent15 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the councillorship happens is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the untidiness does not occur.; sent2 & sent12 -> int7: either the display or the effecting or both occurs.; int7 & sent11 & sent3 -> int8: the mystifying Kandy occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the mystifying Kandy but not the untidiness happens.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the bastinadoing does not occur is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the quitting triggers that the mystifying Kandy occurs and the untidiness does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the spiel does not occur. sent2: if that the aeration does not occur hold the fact that the display and/or the effects happens hold. sent3: the mystifying Kandy is caused by the effects. sent4: the volley happens. sent5: if the baiting occurs the universalisticness occurs. sent6: the entrenching prescriptivism happens but the tillage does not occur. sent7: if the effusion does not occur then the wresting engagement does not occur. sent8: the astrologicalness does not occur. sent9: the councillorship does not occur if the flowerlessness does not occur. sent10: the jumbling happens if the mystifying kilohertz occurs. sent11: the mystifying Kandy is triggered by that the displaying occurs. sent12: the aeration does not occur. sent13: the indelicateness occurs. sent14: the bastinadoing does not occur if the quitting and the non-untidiness happens. sent15: if the fact that the volley happens hold then the councillorship happens. sent16: the stick happens and/or the dinging happens. sent17: that both the untidiness and the quitting occurs causes the floweringness. sent18: if the bibliophilicness does not occur then the effusion does not occur. sent19: if the aniseikonicness occurs then the shimmering and the non-isothermicness occurs. sent20: if the awarding happens and the unenthusiasticness occurs then the melioration does not occur. sent21: if that the wresting supplejack does not occur is not wrong then the seaworthiness or the astigmaticness or both occurs. sent22: the blip occurs if that the localization occurs is right. sent23: the house but not the wresting roentgen happens. sent24: the fact that the weatherliness happens is not false. sent25: the wresting throw-weight happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the untidiness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the quitting occurs.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the untidiness happens and the quitting occurs.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the flowerlessness does not occur.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the councillorship does not occur.; sent15 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the councillorship happens is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the untidiness does not occur.; sent2 & sent12 -> int7: either the display or the effecting or both occurs.; int7 & sent11 & sent3 -> int8: the mystifying Kandy occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the mystifying Kandy but not the untidiness happens.; [assump2] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__