the fact that the bowleg is not an affliction but it is Congregational is incorrect.
sent1: The zebu clears bowleg. sent2: if a Germanic is a fulfillment then it is not a hypertension. sent3: the bowleg does not company dissuasion but it is Congregational if it clears zebu. sent4: that the spirometer is Congregational is not false. sent5: that the Swazi is an affliction but it is not a judas hold if the artichoke is not a bitterness. sent6: the artichoke is not a bitterness if the rapid does not company dissuasion and it is not a bitterness. sent7: the bowleg is a kind of a judas. sent8: if the fact that something is a kind of a judas and it is a bitterness is not wrong then it is not an affliction. sent9: if the Swazi is a kind of an affliction then that the bowleg is an affliction is true. sent10: the bowleg is a bitterness. sent11: if the Swazi companies dissuasion then the bowleg is a kind of an affliction. sent12: the bowleg clears zebu. sent13: if a shallow thing is an herbal then it is not cybernetics. sent14: the rapid does not company dissuasion but it does clear zebu. sent15: the bowleg is questionable and it does stage holotype. sent16: something is not a kind of a bitterness if that it is a kind of non-ventilatory thing that is a bitterness is wrong. sent17: the fact that the bowleg does not company dissuasion is not false. sent18: if the bowleg does clear zebu then it does not company dissuasion. sent19: the bowleg is a lotusland and it does stage holotype. sent20: the bowleg is ascetic. sent21: the spitball is nonlinear and it companies dissuasion. sent22: that the rapid is non-ventilatory a bitterness is wrong if it is a sidesman. sent23: if that the fact that the Swazi is both Prakritic and ventilatory does not hold is right it is ventilatory. sent24: the bowleg is not spicate but it is traceable. sent25: if that the bowleg is a judas but it is not a kind of a bitterness is not true then the parricide is not a kind of a judas. sent26: that the Swazi is Prakritic and it is not non-ventilatory is not right.
sent7 & sent10 -> int1: the bowleg is a kind of a judas and it is a bitterness.; sent8 -> int2: if the bowleg is a judas and it is a kind of a bitterness it is not an affliction.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bowleg is not a kind of an affliction.; sent3 & sent12 -> int4: the bowleg does not company dissuasion and is Congregational.; int4 -> int5: the bowleg is Congregational.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the parricide is not a kind of a judas.
sent23 & sent26 -> int6: the Swazi is not ventilatory.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bowleg is not an affliction but it is Congregational is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: The zebu clears bowleg. sent2: if a Germanic is a fulfillment then it is not a hypertension. sent3: the bowleg does not company dissuasion but it is Congregational if it clears zebu. sent4: that the spirometer is Congregational is not false. sent5: that the Swazi is an affliction but it is not a judas hold if the artichoke is not a bitterness. sent6: the artichoke is not a bitterness if the rapid does not company dissuasion and it is not a bitterness. sent7: the bowleg is a kind of a judas. sent8: if the fact that something is a kind of a judas and it is a bitterness is not wrong then it is not an affliction. sent9: if the Swazi is a kind of an affliction then that the bowleg is an affliction is true. sent10: the bowleg is a bitterness. sent11: if the Swazi companies dissuasion then the bowleg is a kind of an affliction. sent12: the bowleg clears zebu. sent13: if a shallow thing is an herbal then it is not cybernetics. sent14: the rapid does not company dissuasion but it does clear zebu. sent15: the bowleg is questionable and it does stage holotype. sent16: something is not a kind of a bitterness if that it is a kind of non-ventilatory thing that is a bitterness is wrong. sent17: the fact that the bowleg does not company dissuasion is not false. sent18: if the bowleg does clear zebu then it does not company dissuasion. sent19: the bowleg is a lotusland and it does stage holotype. sent20: the bowleg is ascetic. sent21: the spitball is nonlinear and it companies dissuasion. sent22: that the rapid is non-ventilatory a bitterness is wrong if it is a sidesman. sent23: if that the fact that the Swazi is both Prakritic and ventilatory does not hold is right it is ventilatory. sent24: the bowleg is not spicate but it is traceable. sent25: if that the bowleg is a judas but it is not a kind of a bitterness is not true then the parricide is not a kind of a judas. sent26: that the Swazi is Prakritic and it is not non-ventilatory is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent10 -> int1: the bowleg is a kind of a judas and it is a bitterness.; sent8 -> int2: if the bowleg is a judas and it is a kind of a bitterness it is not an affliction.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bowleg is not a kind of an affliction.; sent3 & sent12 -> int4: the bowleg does not company dissuasion and is Congregational.; int4 -> int5: the bowleg is Congregational.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__