the disposing does not occur.
sent1: the smashing Hirudinidae happens. sent2: if that the wrapping occurs hold then the smashing Hirudinidae happens. sent3: if the wrapping occurs then the disposing does not occur and the smashing Hirudinidae occurs. sent4: that the anecdote does not occur and/or the dynamicness happens is false. sent5: if the wrapping does not occur then the smashing Bierce does not occur. sent6: that the reigning clincher but not the smashing Bierce occurs is caused by that the wrapping does not occur. sent7: that the dynamic does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: if the reigning clincher occurs and the smashing Bierce occurs the caecilian does not occur. sent9: the smashing Bierce does not occur. sent10: that the caecilian occurs is prevented by that the reigning clincher but not the smashing Bierce occurs. sent11: if the anecdote happens then the fact that both the non-caecilianness and the wrapping happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wrap does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reigning clincher occurs but the smashing Bierce does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the caecilian does not occur.;
the disposing happens.
$hypothesis$ = the disposing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the smashing Hirudinidae happens. sent2: if that the wrapping occurs hold then the smashing Hirudinidae happens. sent3: if the wrapping occurs then the disposing does not occur and the smashing Hirudinidae occurs. sent4: that the anecdote does not occur and/or the dynamicness happens is false. sent5: if the wrapping does not occur then the smashing Bierce does not occur. sent6: that the reigning clincher but not the smashing Bierce occurs is caused by that the wrapping does not occur. sent7: that the dynamic does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: if the reigning clincher occurs and the smashing Bierce occurs the caecilian does not occur. sent9: the smashing Bierce does not occur. sent10: that the caecilian occurs is prevented by that the reigning clincher but not the smashing Bierce occurs. sent11: if the anecdote happens then the fact that both the non-caecilianness and the wrapping happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wrap does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reigning clincher occurs but the smashing Bierce does not occur.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the caecilian does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__