that if that the fact that the improvisation does not steepen deforestation and is bronchoscopic is not false is not right the shedder does ebb brushwork is wrong.
sent1: something does ebb brushwork if that it is not a kind of a transgene and it is a guy does not hold. sent2: if the shedder is not a kind of a guy it ebbs brushwork. sent3: something ebbs brushwork if that it does not steepen deforestation and is bronchoscopic is incorrect. sent4: the screwballer is not a minimalist. sent5: if the screwballer is minimalist it is not a sigmoidoscope. sent6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a bobtail. sent7: something does ebb brushwork if it does not guy. sent8: if the improvisation does steepen deforestation the shedder ebbs brushwork. sent9: the improvisation is not bronchoscopic. sent10: if the fact that something is a kind of a fossil but it is not a kind of a minimalist is incorrect it is not a sigmoidoscope. sent11: if the improvisation does not steepen deforestation but it is bronchoscopic then the shedder ebbs brushwork. sent12: the fact that the screwballer is a fossil and it is a minimalist does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that it is a sigmoidoscope. sent14: that the improvisation steepens deforestation and is bronchoscopic is wrong. sent15: something is not a kind of a sigmoidoscope if it is a minimalist. sent16: the improvisation does not steepen deforestation if the screwballer is fossil. sent17: if that something is not a kind of a sigmoidoscope is not incorrect that the shedder is not a transgene and is a guy is false. sent18: the improvisation does not steepen deforestation but it is bronchoscopic if the screwballer is a kind of a fossil. sent19: the shedder is a fossil if the fact that the fact that the screwballer is not a kind of a sigmoidoscope but it does ebb brushwork is incorrect hold. sent20: the improvisation does not steepen deforestation.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the screwballer is fossil but it is not minimalist.; assump2 -> int1: the screwballer is fossil.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the improvisation does not steepen deforestation and is bronchoscopic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the improvisation does not steepen deforestation but it is bronchoscopic is incorrect.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the screwballer is fossil but it is not a minimalist is wrong.; sent10 -> int5: if that the screwballer is fossil but it is not minimalist does not hold then the fact that it is not a sigmoidoscope is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the screwballer is not a kind of a sigmoidoscope is right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a sigmoidoscope.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: that the shedder is not a transgene but it is a guy is incorrect.; sent1 -> int9: if the fact that the shedder is both not a transgene and a guy is false it ebbs brushwork.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the shedder ebbs brushwork.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if that the fact that the improvisation does not steepen deforestation and is bronchoscopic is not false is not right the shedder does ebb brushwork is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something does ebb brushwork if that it is not a kind of a transgene and it is a guy does not hold. sent2: if the shedder is not a kind of a guy it ebbs brushwork. sent3: something ebbs brushwork if that it does not steepen deforestation and is bronchoscopic is incorrect. sent4: the screwballer is not a minimalist. sent5: if the screwballer is minimalist it is not a sigmoidoscope. sent6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a bobtail. sent7: something does ebb brushwork if it does not guy. sent8: if the improvisation does steepen deforestation the shedder ebbs brushwork. sent9: the improvisation is not bronchoscopic. sent10: if the fact that something is a kind of a fossil but it is not a kind of a minimalist is incorrect it is not a sigmoidoscope. sent11: if the improvisation does not steepen deforestation but it is bronchoscopic then the shedder ebbs brushwork. sent12: the fact that the screwballer is a fossil and it is a minimalist does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that it is a sigmoidoscope. sent14: that the improvisation steepens deforestation and is bronchoscopic is wrong. sent15: something is not a kind of a sigmoidoscope if it is a minimalist. sent16: the improvisation does not steepen deforestation if the screwballer is fossil. sent17: if that something is not a kind of a sigmoidoscope is not incorrect that the shedder is not a transgene and is a guy is false. sent18: the improvisation does not steepen deforestation but it is bronchoscopic if the screwballer is a kind of a fossil. sent19: the shedder is a fossil if the fact that the fact that the screwballer is not a kind of a sigmoidoscope but it does ebb brushwork is incorrect hold. sent20: the improvisation does not steepen deforestation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the screwballer is fossil but it is not minimalist.; assump2 -> int1: the screwballer is fossil.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the improvisation does not steepen deforestation and is bronchoscopic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the improvisation does not steepen deforestation but it is bronchoscopic is incorrect.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: that the screwballer is fossil but it is not a minimalist is wrong.; sent10 -> int5: if that the screwballer is fossil but it is not minimalist does not hold then the fact that it is not a sigmoidoscope is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the screwballer is not a kind of a sigmoidoscope is right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a sigmoidoscope.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: that the shedder is not a transgene but it is a guy is incorrect.; sent1 -> int9: if the fact that the shedder is both not a transgene and a guy is false it ebbs brushwork.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the shedder ebbs brushwork.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__