the genipa is not regimental.
sent1: something is regimental if it does not deflect. sent2: either the East-sider is mobile or it deflects or both. sent3: the sharpshooter does not deflect if the East-sider either is a kind of a mobile or does not deflect or both. sent4: that something does not braid adjective and it is not viceregal is wrong if it does not deflect. sent5: that the genipa is not regimental is not incorrect if the fact that the sharpshooter is viceregal is true. sent6: the sharpshooter does not deflect if the East-sider does not deflect. sent7: the withholder is cryptogamic thing that braids incapacity. sent8: that the sharpshooter does not braid adjective but it is viceregal is false if it does not deflect. sent9: the fact that the sharpshooter does not braid adjective but it is not non-viceregal is not correct. sent10: the fact that that something is a cupboard but it is not a mobile hold is incorrect if it is a Ranunculus. sent11: that something does not braid adjective but it is viceregal is not true if it does not deflect. sent12: the East-sider is a mobile and/or it does not deflect.
sent4 -> int1: if the sharpshooter does not deflect that it does not braid adjective and it is not viceregal is not right.; sent3 & sent12 -> int2: the sharpshooter does not deflect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the sharpshooter does not braid adjective and is non-viceregal is incorrect.;
the genipa is regimental.
sent1 -> int4: if the genipa does not deflect then that it is regimental is true.; sent10 -> int5: if the fact that the East-sider is not a Ranunculus is wrong then the fact that it is a cupboard and it is not a mobile is false.; sent7 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a kind of cryptogamic thing that braids incapacity.;
$hypothesis$ = the genipa is not regimental. ; $context$ = sent1: something is regimental if it does not deflect. sent2: either the East-sider is mobile or it deflects or both. sent3: the sharpshooter does not deflect if the East-sider either is a kind of a mobile or does not deflect or both. sent4: that something does not braid adjective and it is not viceregal is wrong if it does not deflect. sent5: that the genipa is not regimental is not incorrect if the fact that the sharpshooter is viceregal is true. sent6: the sharpshooter does not deflect if the East-sider does not deflect. sent7: the withholder is cryptogamic thing that braids incapacity. sent8: that the sharpshooter does not braid adjective but it is viceregal is false if it does not deflect. sent9: the fact that the sharpshooter does not braid adjective but it is not non-viceregal is not correct. sent10: the fact that that something is a cupboard but it is not a mobile hold is incorrect if it is a Ranunculus. sent11: that something does not braid adjective but it is viceregal is not true if it does not deflect. sent12: the East-sider is a mobile and/or it does not deflect. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the sharpshooter does not deflect that it does not braid adjective and it is not viceregal is not right.; sent3 & sent12 -> int2: the sharpshooter does not deflect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the sharpshooter does not braid adjective and is non-viceregal is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__