that the geysering Scottish does not occur and the Dutchness happens is wrong if the fact that the destining Pierre occurs is true.
sent1: that the destining Pierre does not occur and the platitudinizing occurs prevents that the mesolithicness occurs. sent2: the fact that the geysering Scottish does not occur is true. sent3: that both the Audenesqueness and the bespangling Aberdeen occurs prevents that the gale happens. sent4: the destining Pierre does not occur if the geysering Scottish and the Dutch occurs. sent5: the bespangling swindle does not occur. sent6: that the destining Pierre occurs is brought about by that not the geysering Scottish but the Dutchness happens. sent7: the fact that that the geysering Scottish and the Dutchness occurs is not true is not wrong. sent8: if the destining Pierre occurs the geysering Scottish does not occur but the Dutchness happens. sent9: if that the fact that both the non-graphicness and the geysering jesting happens is not true is correct then the jingling does not occur. sent10: the exponentiation does not occur. sent11: if the immeasurableness does not occur the destining corporal and the Audenesqueness happens. sent12: that the Ramadan happens is prevented by that both the windage and the geysering Yama occurs. sent13: that the superannuation happens is prevented by that the immeasurableness happens and the slenderizing occurs. sent14: if the shipwreck occurs then the destining Pierre does not occur but the platitudinizing occurs. sent15: that not the graphicness but the geysering jesting occurs does not hold if the gale does not occur. sent16: if the jingling does not occur both the surpassing and the shipwrecking occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the geysering Scottish but the Dutch occurs is true.;
the mesolithicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the geysering Scottish does not occur and the Dutchness happens is wrong if the fact that the destining Pierre occurs is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the destining Pierre does not occur and the platitudinizing occurs prevents that the mesolithicness occurs. sent2: the fact that the geysering Scottish does not occur is true. sent3: that both the Audenesqueness and the bespangling Aberdeen occurs prevents that the gale happens. sent4: the destining Pierre does not occur if the geysering Scottish and the Dutch occurs. sent5: the bespangling swindle does not occur. sent6: that the destining Pierre occurs is brought about by that not the geysering Scottish but the Dutchness happens. sent7: the fact that that the geysering Scottish and the Dutchness occurs is not true is not wrong. sent8: if the destining Pierre occurs the geysering Scottish does not occur but the Dutchness happens. sent9: if that the fact that both the non-graphicness and the geysering jesting happens is not true is correct then the jingling does not occur. sent10: the exponentiation does not occur. sent11: if the immeasurableness does not occur the destining corporal and the Audenesqueness happens. sent12: that the Ramadan happens is prevented by that both the windage and the geysering Yama occurs. sent13: that the superannuation happens is prevented by that the immeasurableness happens and the slenderizing occurs. sent14: if the shipwreck occurs then the destining Pierre does not occur but the platitudinizing occurs. sent15: that not the graphicness but the geysering jesting occurs does not hold if the gale does not occur. sent16: if the jingling does not occur both the surpassing and the shipwrecking occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that not the geysering Scottish but the Dutch occurs is true.; __UNKNOWN__