the sleuth is not a kind of a xerography.
sent1: if the styrene is a sublimity then the imposter is ecological. sent2: if that the popover does not expire and it is not a equinoctial is incorrect then it is not a dunk. sent3: if that the thallophyte scourges and does not honor diemaker is not correct then the styrene does not honor diemaker. sent4: if the styrene does not honor diemaker then that the imposter fattens and does not mint tan is not true. sent5: if something is equinoctial but it does not expire it is not a kind of a xerography. sent6: the sleuth is a kind of a equinoctial but it does not expire if the fact that the popover does Charleston is incorrect. sent7: if that the styrene is ecological is right the sleuth is a kind of a xerography. sent8: there exists nothing that is a kind of a scourge that does not honor diemaker. sent9: the popover is a equinoctial and it does expire. sent10: if the popover is a equinoctial the fact that the imposter is not a sublimity or does not Charleston or both is not false. sent11: the popover expires. sent12: the sleuth is a sublimity. sent13: if the fact that something fattens and does not mint tan is not true then it does mint tan. sent14: if something is not a kind of a equinoctial then either it is a xerography or it does expire or both. sent15: that something does not Charleston but it is a kind of a sublimity is incorrect if it is not ecological. sent16: the imposter is not a sublimity and/or it is not a kind of a equinoctial. sent17: if the imposter does not Charleston then the styrene is ecological. sent18: if something is indulgent and/or does not fumble chordate then the fact that it is not merciful is correct. sent19: something is not ecological if it mints tan and is not merciful. sent20: if the popover is a xerography the sleuth is not a xerography. sent21: if the imposter is not a sublimity then the styrene is ecological.
sent9 -> int1: the popover is a kind of a equinoctial.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: either the imposter is not a sublimity or it is not a Charleston or both.; int2 & sent21 & sent17 -> int3: the styrene is ecological.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the sleuth is not a kind of a xerography is not wrong.
sent14 -> int4: if the popover is not a equinoctial it is a xerography or it expires or both.; sent15 -> int5: if the imposter is non-ecological that it is both not a Charleston and a sublimity is not true.; sent19 -> int6: if that the imposter does mint tan but it is not merciful is not incorrect then it is not ecological.; sent13 -> int7: the imposter mints tan if the fact that it fattens and it does not mints tan does not hold.; sent8 -> int8: that the thallophyte scourges but it does not honor diemaker does not hold.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the styrene does not honor diemaker.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the imposter does fatten but it does not mint tan is not true.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the imposter does mint tan.; sent18 -> int12: if either the imposter is indulgent or it does not fumble chordate or both it is not merciful.;
$hypothesis$ = the sleuth is not a kind of a xerography. ; $context$ = sent1: if the styrene is a sublimity then the imposter is ecological. sent2: if that the popover does not expire and it is not a equinoctial is incorrect then it is not a dunk. sent3: if that the thallophyte scourges and does not honor diemaker is not correct then the styrene does not honor diemaker. sent4: if the styrene does not honor diemaker then that the imposter fattens and does not mint tan is not true. sent5: if something is equinoctial but it does not expire it is not a kind of a xerography. sent6: the sleuth is a kind of a equinoctial but it does not expire if the fact that the popover does Charleston is incorrect. sent7: if that the styrene is ecological is right the sleuth is a kind of a xerography. sent8: there exists nothing that is a kind of a scourge that does not honor diemaker. sent9: the popover is a equinoctial and it does expire. sent10: if the popover is a equinoctial the fact that the imposter is not a sublimity or does not Charleston or both is not false. sent11: the popover expires. sent12: the sleuth is a sublimity. sent13: if the fact that something fattens and does not mint tan is not true then it does mint tan. sent14: if something is not a kind of a equinoctial then either it is a xerography or it does expire or both. sent15: that something does not Charleston but it is a kind of a sublimity is incorrect if it is not ecological. sent16: the imposter is not a sublimity and/or it is not a kind of a equinoctial. sent17: if the imposter does not Charleston then the styrene is ecological. sent18: if something is indulgent and/or does not fumble chordate then the fact that it is not merciful is correct. sent19: something is not ecological if it mints tan and is not merciful. sent20: if the popover is a xerography the sleuth is not a xerography. sent21: if the imposter is not a sublimity then the styrene is ecological. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the popover is a kind of a equinoctial.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: either the imposter is not a sublimity or it is not a Charleston or both.; int2 & sent21 & sent17 -> int3: the styrene is ecological.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__