the Latvian axes Judas.
sent1: if something is not unequivocal then it does not pipe and is a Ventner. sent2: the roentgenium is not a kind of a crossing if something that instructs Mansi is a Updike. sent3: that something is not zygotic is not incorrect if that it is anuretic or it is not an anterior or both does not hold. sent4: the outhouse is non-irrational. sent5: something is not antecubital if it is a kind of a pipe that axes Judas. sent6: if the Latvian is a Ventner the cloveroot does axe Judas. sent7: everything does appeal and it rambles abdication. sent8: there is nothing such that it is anuretic and/or it is not an anterior. sent9: the fact that if something is not a cradle then it is both a Updike and a ripple hold. sent10: the crap does not ramble abdication if the fact that the roentgenium is morphophonemic and does conduct is not true. sent11: the Latvian is not antecubital. sent12: the Latvian is a kind of a Ventner if it is not unequivocal. sent13: if the crap does not ramble abdication the cloveroot is both a pipe and an appealing. sent14: the mire is not a cradle but it axes Latvian. sent15: if something is not zygotic then the Latvian is a kind of a Ventner and it is a kind of a diuretic. sent16: the Latvian is not a kind of an appealing if it is not a kind of a pipe and it is a Ventner. sent17: if the roentgenium is not an appealing then the crap is not a Ventner and/or it is not a kind of a pipe. sent18: if that the mire is not a shape and axes exhaustion does not hold it instructs Mansi. sent19: the Latvian is both not antecubital and not unequivocal if it axes Judas. sent20: everything rambles abdication. sent21: something does shape. sent22: that the mire does not shape and axes exhaustion is wrong if there exists something such that it shape.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Latvian axes Judas.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the Latvian is not antecubital and is not unequivocal.; int1 -> int2: that the Latvian is not unequivocal is right.; sent1 -> int3: if the Latvian is not unequivocal then it is not a pipe but a Ventner.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Latvian is not a pipe but it is a Ventner.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the Latvian does not appeal.; sent7 -> int6: the Latvian is an appealing and it rambles abdication.; int6 -> int7: the Latvian is an appealing.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the cloveroot is not antecubital.
sent5 -> int9: if the cloveroot is a kind of a pipe that does axe Judas then it is not antecubital.; sent21 & sent22 -> int10: the fact that the mire does not shape and does axe exhaustion is incorrect.; sent18 & int10 -> int11: the mire instructs Mansi.; sent14 -> int12: the mire is not a cradle.; sent9 -> int13: if the mire is not a cradle it is a kind of a Updike and it ripples.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the mire is a kind of a Updike and it ripples.; int14 -> int15: the mire is a Updike.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the mire does instruct Mansi and is a Updike.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it does instruct Mansi and is a Updike.; sent2 & int17 -> int18: the roentgenium does not cross.; sent3 -> int19: if that the quarterly is anuretic and/or it is not anterior does not hold that it is not zygotic hold.; sent8 -> int20: the fact that the quarterly is anuretic and/or is not a kind of an anterior is not right.; int19 & int20 -> int21: the quarterly is not zygotic.; int21 -> int22: everything is not zygotic.; int22 -> int23: the plasmablast is non-zygotic.; int23 -> int24: there is something such that it is not zygotic.; sent15 & int24 -> int25: the fact that the Latvian is a kind of a Ventner and is a diuretic hold.; int25 -> int26: the Latvian is a Ventner.; sent6 & int26 -> int27: the cloveroot does axe Judas.;
$hypothesis$ = the Latvian axes Judas. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not unequivocal then it does not pipe and is a Ventner. sent2: the roentgenium is not a kind of a crossing if something that instructs Mansi is a Updike. sent3: that something is not zygotic is not incorrect if that it is anuretic or it is not an anterior or both does not hold. sent4: the outhouse is non-irrational. sent5: something is not antecubital if it is a kind of a pipe that axes Judas. sent6: if the Latvian is a Ventner the cloveroot does axe Judas. sent7: everything does appeal and it rambles abdication. sent8: there is nothing such that it is anuretic and/or it is not an anterior. sent9: the fact that if something is not a cradle then it is both a Updike and a ripple hold. sent10: the crap does not ramble abdication if the fact that the roentgenium is morphophonemic and does conduct is not true. sent11: the Latvian is not antecubital. sent12: the Latvian is a kind of a Ventner if it is not unequivocal. sent13: if the crap does not ramble abdication the cloveroot is both a pipe and an appealing. sent14: the mire is not a cradle but it axes Latvian. sent15: if something is not zygotic then the Latvian is a kind of a Ventner and it is a kind of a diuretic. sent16: the Latvian is not a kind of an appealing if it is not a kind of a pipe and it is a Ventner. sent17: if the roentgenium is not an appealing then the crap is not a Ventner and/or it is not a kind of a pipe. sent18: if that the mire is not a shape and axes exhaustion does not hold it instructs Mansi. sent19: the Latvian is both not antecubital and not unequivocal if it axes Judas. sent20: everything rambles abdication. sent21: something does shape. sent22: that the mire does not shape and axes exhaustion is wrong if there exists something such that it shape. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Latvian axes Judas.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the Latvian is not antecubital and is not unequivocal.; int1 -> int2: that the Latvian is not unequivocal is right.; sent1 -> int3: if the Latvian is not unequivocal then it is not a pipe but a Ventner.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Latvian is not a pipe but it is a Ventner.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the Latvian does not appeal.; sent7 -> int6: the Latvian is an appealing and it rambles abdication.; int6 -> int7: the Latvian is an appealing.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__