there is something such that if it is not a attenuator and it reconstructs then that it is not a baseness is correct.
sent1: if the merganser is a kind of a cyclicity and is anemophilous then it is not a kind of a attenuator. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a attenuator and does reconstruct it is a baseness. sent3: the coupling does not reconstruct if it does bar Sontag and it is impolitic. sent4: there exists something such that if it is both Rabelaisian and trochaic it is not dramatic. sent5: if something is a kind of a attenuator that reconstructs it is not a kind of a baseness. sent6: if something is not a kind of a attenuator and reconstructs it is not a baseness.
sent6 -> int1: the coupling is not a baseness if it is not a attenuator and reconstructs.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a attenuator and it reconstructs then that it is not a baseness is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the merganser is a kind of a cyclicity and is anemophilous then it is not a kind of a attenuator. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a attenuator and does reconstruct it is a baseness. sent3: the coupling does not reconstruct if it does bar Sontag and it is impolitic. sent4: there exists something such that if it is both Rabelaisian and trochaic it is not dramatic. sent5: if something is a kind of a attenuator that reconstructs it is not a kind of a baseness. sent6: if something is not a kind of a attenuator and reconstructs it is not a baseness. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the coupling is not a baseness if it is not a attenuator and reconstructs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__