the centrifuge does not excuse affiliated.
sent1: the decomposition is a kind of a result if it is carcinogenic. sent2: the anti-inflammatory is a kind of a Menelaus. sent3: if the fact that something does shiver articulator but it does not bench is not true then it is a outfall. sent4: if the ready-to-wear does activate tasseled and is a bench the inoculant is not carcinogenic. sent5: something is not a kind of a outfall if it is an agua. sent6: there exists nothing that is not a Shankar and is a mailman. sent7: if the hoecake does not result the decomposition is not a kind of a mailman. sent8: the fact that the inoculant does not shiver articulator and does result is not right. sent9: if something is not a result it is not a Menelaus and it is an agua. sent10: the hoecake is a Shankar if that it is not a Shankar and it is a mailman does not hold. sent11: the decomposition does excuse affiliated and is a eardrum. sent12: the centrifuge is not a kind of a Menelaus. sent13: the brambling is not a Menelaus if the inoculant is not carcinogenic. sent14: the ready-to-wear does activate tasseled and benches. sent15: there exists nothing such that it is both not a Menelaus and carcinogenic. sent16: something is an agua if the fact that it is a result and not a Menelaus is not true. sent17: the fact that the decomposition is a kind of an agua that is a kind of a mailman is not correct. sent18: if that the brambling is not a Menelaus hold then the fact that that the decomposition is a result but it is not a Menelaus is right is wrong. sent19: the hoecake does shiver articulator if the decomposition is not a outfall. sent20: if the ready-to-wear does not activate tasseled the fact that the inoculant is carcinogenic and it does activate tasseled is not true. sent21: there exists nothing such that it excuses affiliated and it is carcinogenic. sent22: if the brambling excuses affiliated and is a outfall then the centrifuge is not a Menelaus. sent23: if the fact that something is a kind of a statuary hold it is not unemotional.
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the inoculant is not carcinogenic.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the brambling is not a Menelaus.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the fact that the decomposition is a kind of a result but it is not a Menelaus does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: the decomposition is an agua if that it is a kind of a result that is not a Menelaus is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the decomposition is an agua.; sent5 -> int6: if the decomposition is a kind of an agua it is not a outfall.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the decomposition is not a outfall.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the hoecake shivers articulator.; sent6 -> int9: that the hoecake is not a Shankar and is a mailman does not hold.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the hoecake is a Shankar.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the hoecake shivers articulator and is a Shankar.;
the centrifuge excuses affiliated.
sent9 -> int12: the ready-to-wear is not a Menelaus but it is an agua if it does not result.;
$hypothesis$ = the centrifuge does not excuse affiliated. ; $context$ = sent1: the decomposition is a kind of a result if it is carcinogenic. sent2: the anti-inflammatory is a kind of a Menelaus. sent3: if the fact that something does shiver articulator but it does not bench is not true then it is a outfall. sent4: if the ready-to-wear does activate tasseled and is a bench the inoculant is not carcinogenic. sent5: something is not a kind of a outfall if it is an agua. sent6: there exists nothing that is not a Shankar and is a mailman. sent7: if the hoecake does not result the decomposition is not a kind of a mailman. sent8: the fact that the inoculant does not shiver articulator and does result is not right. sent9: if something is not a result it is not a Menelaus and it is an agua. sent10: the hoecake is a Shankar if that it is not a Shankar and it is a mailman does not hold. sent11: the decomposition does excuse affiliated and is a eardrum. sent12: the centrifuge is not a kind of a Menelaus. sent13: the brambling is not a Menelaus if the inoculant is not carcinogenic. sent14: the ready-to-wear does activate tasseled and benches. sent15: there exists nothing such that it is both not a Menelaus and carcinogenic. sent16: something is an agua if the fact that it is a result and not a Menelaus is not true. sent17: the fact that the decomposition is a kind of an agua that is a kind of a mailman is not correct. sent18: if that the brambling is not a Menelaus hold then the fact that that the decomposition is a result but it is not a Menelaus is right is wrong. sent19: the hoecake does shiver articulator if the decomposition is not a outfall. sent20: if the ready-to-wear does not activate tasseled the fact that the inoculant is carcinogenic and it does activate tasseled is not true. sent21: there exists nothing such that it excuses affiliated and it is carcinogenic. sent22: if the brambling excuses affiliated and is a outfall then the centrifuge is not a Menelaus. sent23: if the fact that something is a kind of a statuary hold it is not unemotional. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the inoculant is not carcinogenic.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the brambling is not a Menelaus.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the fact that the decomposition is a kind of a result but it is not a Menelaus does not hold.; sent16 -> int4: the decomposition is an agua if that it is a kind of a result that is not a Menelaus is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the decomposition is an agua.; sent5 -> int6: if the decomposition is a kind of an agua it is not a outfall.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the decomposition is not a outfall.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the hoecake shivers articulator.; sent6 -> int9: that the hoecake is not a Shankar and is a mailman does not hold.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the hoecake is a Shankar.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the hoecake shivers articulator and is a Shankar.; __UNKNOWN__