there exists something such that that it is not tricentenary and is botulinal does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that that it does not direct racket and it is a diary does not hold. sent2: that the Ham is tricentenary and it is botulinal is not right. sent3: that the Ham is tricentenary and is botulinal does not hold if something is undemocratic. sent4: the fact that the mossback does pipe and is botulinal does not hold. sent5: that that the Ham is not a kind of a Bowdlerism and is a kind of a biennial is not incorrect is incorrect if the calanthe is undemocratic. sent6: that the Ham is not a Nervi but it does direct Ham is not correct if there exists something such that it is botulinal. sent7: the fact that the Ham is not tricentenary but botulinal is wrong if there exists something such that it is undemocratic. sent8: something is not tricentenary but botulinal. sent9: there exists something such that that it is both tricentenary and botulinal is not true. sent10: the fact that something is not a freak but it brooches searchlight is incorrect if it is undemocratic.
there is something such that that it is not a Bowdlerism and is a biennial is not true.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it is not tricentenary and is botulinal does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it does not direct racket and it is a diary does not hold. sent2: that the Ham is tricentenary and it is botulinal is not right. sent3: that the Ham is tricentenary and is botulinal does not hold if something is undemocratic. sent4: the fact that the mossback does pipe and is botulinal does not hold. sent5: that that the Ham is not a kind of a Bowdlerism and is a kind of a biennial is not incorrect is incorrect if the calanthe is undemocratic. sent6: that the Ham is not a Nervi but it does direct Ham is not correct if there exists something such that it is botulinal. sent7: the fact that the Ham is not tricentenary but botulinal is wrong if there exists something such that it is undemocratic. sent8: something is not tricentenary but botulinal. sent9: there exists something such that that it is both tricentenary and botulinal is not true. sent10: the fact that something is not a freak but it brooches searchlight is incorrect if it is undemocratic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__