that either the dug is culinary or it is a kind of a Reformation or both is not right.
sent1: if something is not gutless it surmises soupspoon. sent2: that if the facilitation is biogeographic then the dug teases differential but it is not a juvenile is not incorrect. sent3: something is not a promiser if the fact that it is a kind of a promiser and it is mesoblastic is not correct. sent4: that the tinkerer is a promiser and mesoblastic does not hold if the reversible is not an epidemic. sent5: either the facilitation is not biogeographic or it is not an exposure or both if the Epistle does surmise soupspoon. sent6: the fact that something is not biogeographic is correct if it is not biogeographic and/or it is not an exposure. sent7: the prothrombinase is not a kind of a catboat. sent8: the degeneration is not gutless but it is necessary if the tinkerer is not a promiser. sent9: if something does tease differential and is not juvenile it is a Reformation. sent10: if something is a Reformation it is biogeographic. sent11: if something does tease differential and is not biogeographic the fact that it is a kind of a Reformation is not wrong. sent12: the fact that the prothrombinase is caesural and/or it is not non-future is not correct if it is not a catboat. sent13: if the sailboat surmises soupspoon then the Epistle does surmises soupspoon. sent14: if the degeneration is not gutless and is not unnecessary then the sailboat is not gutless. sent15: the facilitation is biogeographic.
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the dug does tease differential and is not a juvenile.; sent9 -> int2: if the dug teases differential and is not juvenile then it is a Reformation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dug is a kind of a Reformation.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the vineyard is not non-biogeographic.
sent10 -> int4: if the vineyard is a Reformation then it is biogeographic.;
$hypothesis$ = that either the dug is culinary or it is a kind of a Reformation or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not gutless it surmises soupspoon. sent2: that if the facilitation is biogeographic then the dug teases differential but it is not a juvenile is not incorrect. sent3: something is not a promiser if the fact that it is a kind of a promiser and it is mesoblastic is not correct. sent4: that the tinkerer is a promiser and mesoblastic does not hold if the reversible is not an epidemic. sent5: either the facilitation is not biogeographic or it is not an exposure or both if the Epistle does surmise soupspoon. sent6: the fact that something is not biogeographic is correct if it is not biogeographic and/or it is not an exposure. sent7: the prothrombinase is not a kind of a catboat. sent8: the degeneration is not gutless but it is necessary if the tinkerer is not a promiser. sent9: if something does tease differential and is not juvenile it is a Reformation. sent10: if something is a Reformation it is biogeographic. sent11: if something does tease differential and is not biogeographic the fact that it is a kind of a Reformation is not wrong. sent12: the fact that the prothrombinase is caesural and/or it is not non-future is not correct if it is not a catboat. sent13: if the sailboat surmises soupspoon then the Epistle does surmises soupspoon. sent14: if the degeneration is not gutless and is not unnecessary then the sailboat is not gutless. sent15: the facilitation is biogeographic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the dug does tease differential and is not a juvenile.; sent9 -> int2: if the dug teases differential and is not juvenile then it is a Reformation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dug is a kind of a Reformation.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__