that the abyss is not a supervision and not Iraqi is wrong.
sent1: that the abyss is not a supervision and is a kind of a Iraqi is not correct. sent2: the fact that something is both not a supervision and not Iraqi is right if it does lace transcript. sent3: that something is not a kind of a supervision and it is not a Iraqi is incorrect if it does not lace transcript. sent4: the abyss does not lace transcript if that that it does not reckon Baku and does lace transcript is right is not true. sent5: that the abyss does not reckon Baku but it does lace transcript is not true.
sent3 -> int1: that the abyss is both not a supervision and not a Iraqi is not correct if it does not lace transcript.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the abyss does not lace transcript.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the abyss is not a kind of a supervision and it is not Iraqi.
sent2 -> int3: if the anticyclone laces transcript then it is not a supervision and is not a Iraqi.;
$hypothesis$ = that the abyss is not a supervision and not Iraqi is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the abyss is not a supervision and is a kind of a Iraqi is not correct. sent2: the fact that something is both not a supervision and not Iraqi is right if it does lace transcript. sent3: that something is not a kind of a supervision and it is not a Iraqi is incorrect if it does not lace transcript. sent4: the abyss does not lace transcript if that that it does not reckon Baku and does lace transcript is right is not true. sent5: that the abyss does not reckon Baku but it does lace transcript is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: that the abyss is both not a supervision and not a Iraqi is not correct if it does not lace transcript.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the abyss does not lace transcript.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__