the fact that the keeper does not charm Talmud and is aposiopetic is not true.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that that it is a compartmentalization and is not a kind of a scission is correct is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that it is open-hearth and it is not a kind of a Dachau. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is open-hearth and it does telepathize does not hold. sent4: the fact that the monarch is a Merrimac hold if the fact that the keeper does not charm Talmud does not hold. sent5: something does not charm Talmud if it is not a Merrimac and it is open-hearth. sent6: that if the monarch is not aposiopetic the monarch charms Talmud is not false. sent7: the monarch telepathizes and is curious. sent8: the fact that the redhorse rices Pincus but it does not rice lie is wrong if there is something such that it does not fritter. sent9: the monarch is a kind of a Dachau and it is not incurious. sent10: the keeper does not telepathize and it is not a Merrimac. sent11: there is something such that it is not a fritter. sent12: the keeper is a Merrimac that does not rice lie if it rices Pincus. sent13: that the monarch rices Pincus but it does not rice lie is not true. sent14: if the fact that the monarch does rice Pincus but it does not rice lie does not hold it is not aposiopetic. sent15: the fact that the monarch does rice lie is not false. sent16: if the fact that something is not eventful hold then the fact that it is not curious and is not a Dachau is not true. sent17: there exists something such that that it is a compartmentalization and it is a scission does not hold. sent18: the redhorse does snag citrange. sent19: the keeper is open-hearth if the monarch is a kind of a Dachau that is not eventful. sent20: if the monarch rices Pincus the redhorse is eventful. sent21: that if there is something such that that it is a compartmentalization and is not a scission is false the monarch is not eventful is not wrong. sent22: that the keeper is not open-hearth if the keeper is a Merrimac and does not rice lie hold. sent23: something is a Merrimac if that it is a kind of incurious thing that is not a Dachau does not hold. sent24: if the fact that the redhorse rices Pincus and does not rice lie is false then the keeper is aposiopetic. sent25: the redhorse is not a kind of a Merrimac if there is something such that that it rices Pincus and it does not charm Talmud does not hold.
sent9 -> int1: the monarch is a Dachau.; sent1 & sent21 -> int2: the monarch is not eventful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the monarch is a Dachau but it is not eventful.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the keeper is not non-open-hearth.; sent10 -> int5: the keeper is not a Merrimac.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the keeper is not a Merrimac and is open-hearth.; sent5 -> int7: if the keeper is not a kind of a Merrimac but it is open-hearth then it does not charm Talmud.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the keeper does not charm Talmud.; sent11 & sent8 -> int9: that the redhorse does rice Pincus but it does not rice lie does not hold.; sent24 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the keeper is aposiopetic is right.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the keeper does not charm Talmud and is aposiopetic is false.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the keeper does not charm Talmud and is aposiopetic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that that it is a compartmentalization and is not a kind of a scission is correct is incorrect. sent2: there is something such that it is open-hearth and it is not a kind of a Dachau. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is open-hearth and it does telepathize does not hold. sent4: the fact that the monarch is a Merrimac hold if the fact that the keeper does not charm Talmud does not hold. sent5: something does not charm Talmud if it is not a Merrimac and it is open-hearth. sent6: that if the monarch is not aposiopetic the monarch charms Talmud is not false. sent7: the monarch telepathizes and is curious. sent8: the fact that the redhorse rices Pincus but it does not rice lie is wrong if there is something such that it does not fritter. sent9: the monarch is a kind of a Dachau and it is not incurious. sent10: the keeper does not telepathize and it is not a Merrimac. sent11: there is something such that it is not a fritter. sent12: the keeper is a Merrimac that does not rice lie if it rices Pincus. sent13: that the monarch rices Pincus but it does not rice lie is not true. sent14: if the fact that the monarch does rice Pincus but it does not rice lie does not hold it is not aposiopetic. sent15: the fact that the monarch does rice lie is not false. sent16: if the fact that something is not eventful hold then the fact that it is not curious and is not a Dachau is not true. sent17: there exists something such that that it is a compartmentalization and it is a scission does not hold. sent18: the redhorse does snag citrange. sent19: the keeper is open-hearth if the monarch is a kind of a Dachau that is not eventful. sent20: if the monarch rices Pincus the redhorse is eventful. sent21: that if there is something such that that it is a compartmentalization and is not a scission is false the monarch is not eventful is not wrong. sent22: that the keeper is not open-hearth if the keeper is a Merrimac and does not rice lie hold. sent23: something is a Merrimac if that it is a kind of incurious thing that is not a Dachau does not hold. sent24: if the fact that the redhorse rices Pincus and does not rice lie is false then the keeper is aposiopetic. sent25: the redhorse is not a kind of a Merrimac if there is something such that that it rices Pincus and it does not charm Talmud does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the monarch is a Dachau.; sent1 & sent21 -> int2: the monarch is not eventful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the monarch is a Dachau but it is not eventful.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the keeper is not non-open-hearth.; sent10 -> int5: the keeper is not a Merrimac.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the keeper is not a Merrimac and is open-hearth.; sent5 -> int7: if the keeper is not a kind of a Merrimac but it is open-hearth then it does not charm Talmud.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the keeper does not charm Talmud.; sent11 & sent8 -> int9: that the redhorse does rice Pincus but it does not rice lie does not hold.; sent24 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the keeper is aposiopetic is right.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__