the fact that the Monsignor does not fleece but it is offing is wrong if the haven is not a kind of a pavage.
sent1: if something is not a Banff then that it does not luminesce and it is a Rastafarian is not right. sent2: if something is a notch and/or not uncivil it is not important. sent3: if the catwalk is not an endocrine it is a Banff. sent4: the fact that the catwalk is both not offing and a Banff is not correct. sent5: the orthopteron is a notch and/or not uncivil. sent6: the Monsignor does not fleece but it is offing if the district is offing. sent7: if the haven is not a pavage then the fact that the Monsignor is a fleece that is offing is wrong. sent8: the catwalk is not a pavage if there is something such that that it is not offing and it does not predate maintenance is not right. sent9: if the catwalk does not luminesce but it is an endocrine that the haven is a pavage is not incorrect. sent10: if something is not an endocrine it is a Banff. sent11: if the fact that the Monsignor is advective but it is not a fleece is false then the haven is not a kind of a fleece. sent12: that the Monsignor is not a fleece but offing is not right if the district is offing. sent13: the catwalk is endocrine. sent14: something is a Banff if the fact that it does not luminesce and is an endocrine is wrong. sent15: if the district is a Banff that the catwalk does not luminesce and is offing is not right. sent16: if something is not important then the fact that the Monsignor is advective but it does not fleece is not right. sent17: that the Monsignor is both a fleece and offing does not hold if the district is offing. sent18: that the haven is a kind of non-offing thing that does not predate maintenance is not true if it does not fleece.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the catwalk does not luminesce but it is endocrine.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the haven is a pavage.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the haven is not a pavage.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the catwalk does not luminesce and is an endocrine is wrong.; sent14 -> int4: if the fact that the catwalk does not luminesce but it is an endocrine is incorrect then it is a Banff.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the catwalk is a Banff.;
that the fact that the district does not luminesce and is a kind of a Rastafarian is wrong is not false.
sent1 -> int6: if the district is not a Banff then that it does not luminesce and is a Rastafarian is wrong.; sent2 -> int7: the orthopteron is not important if it notches or it is not uncivil or both.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the orthopteron is not important.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not important.; int9 & sent16 -> int10: that the fact that the fact that the Monsignor is a kind of advective thing that is not a fleece is right is false is true.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: that the haven is not a kind of a fleece hold.; sent18 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the haven is non-offing thing that does not predate maintenance does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is not offing and it does not predate maintenance is not right.; int13 & sent8 -> int14: the catwalk is not a pavage.; int14 -> int15: something is not a pavage.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Monsignor does not fleece but it is offing is wrong if the haven is not a kind of a pavage. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a Banff then that it does not luminesce and it is a Rastafarian is not right. sent2: if something is a notch and/or not uncivil it is not important. sent3: if the catwalk is not an endocrine it is a Banff. sent4: the fact that the catwalk is both not offing and a Banff is not correct. sent5: the orthopteron is a notch and/or not uncivil. sent6: the Monsignor does not fleece but it is offing if the district is offing. sent7: if the haven is not a pavage then the fact that the Monsignor is a fleece that is offing is wrong. sent8: the catwalk is not a pavage if there is something such that that it is not offing and it does not predate maintenance is not right. sent9: if the catwalk does not luminesce but it is an endocrine that the haven is a pavage is not incorrect. sent10: if something is not an endocrine it is a Banff. sent11: if the fact that the Monsignor is advective but it is not a fleece is false then the haven is not a kind of a fleece. sent12: that the Monsignor is not a fleece but offing is not right if the district is offing. sent13: the catwalk is endocrine. sent14: something is a Banff if the fact that it does not luminesce and is an endocrine is wrong. sent15: if the district is a Banff that the catwalk does not luminesce and is offing is not right. sent16: if something is not important then the fact that the Monsignor is advective but it does not fleece is not right. sent17: that the Monsignor is both a fleece and offing does not hold if the district is offing. sent18: that the haven is a kind of non-offing thing that does not predate maintenance is not true if it does not fleece. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the catwalk does not luminesce but it is endocrine.; sent9 & assump2 -> int1: the haven is a pavage.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the haven is not a pavage.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the catwalk does not luminesce and is an endocrine is wrong.; sent14 -> int4: if the fact that the catwalk does not luminesce but it is an endocrine is incorrect then it is a Banff.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the catwalk is a Banff.; __UNKNOWN__