there exists something such that if it is not an episteme that it is a kind of an aging and/or is not acroscopic is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the anime does age and/or it is non-acroscopic is not right if it is an episteme. sent2: the fact that something is not autogamous but it is an episteme is false if it is heavenly. sent3: if the Mahayanist is not polygonal and not a transference then the anime is not polygonal. sent4: something is both not polygonal and not a transference if it is not Orphic. sent5: there exists something such that if it is an episteme that it is an aging or it is not acroscopic or both is not correct. sent6: the anime is acroscopic. sent7: there is something such that if it is not an episteme then it is acroscopic. sent8: if the fact that the anime is non-acroscopic is true then it is an episteme. sent9: if the fact that something is not autogamous and is an episteme is not correct then it is ductless. sent10: the heartthrob is acroscopic. sent11: if something is not polygonal that it is heavenly is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anime is an aging and/or it is not acroscopic.;
the anime is ductless.
sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the anime is non-autogamous but it is an episteme does not hold then the fact that it is ductless is not incorrect.; sent2 -> int2: if the anime is heavenly the fact that it is not autogamous but an episteme is not right.; sent11 -> int3: if the anime is not polygonal it is not non-heavenly.; sent4 -> int4: the Mahayanist is non-polygonal thing that is not a kind of a transference if it is non-Orphic.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not an episteme that it is a kind of an aging and/or is not acroscopic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the anime does age and/or it is non-acroscopic is not right if it is an episteme. sent2: the fact that something is not autogamous but it is an episteme is false if it is heavenly. sent3: if the Mahayanist is not polygonal and not a transference then the anime is not polygonal. sent4: something is both not polygonal and not a transference if it is not Orphic. sent5: there exists something such that if it is an episteme that it is an aging or it is not acroscopic or both is not correct. sent6: the anime is acroscopic. sent7: there is something such that if it is not an episteme then it is acroscopic. sent8: if the fact that the anime is non-acroscopic is true then it is an episteme. sent9: if the fact that something is not autogamous and is an episteme is not correct then it is ductless. sent10: the heartthrob is acroscopic. sent11: if something is not polygonal that it is heavenly is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anime is an aging and/or it is not acroscopic.; __UNKNOWN__