the whelping Bartlett does not occur and the irreverence does not occur if the prolateness does not occur.
sent1: if the recission does not occur then the fact that the postwarness does not occur and the Icelandic occurs does not hold. sent2: if the postwarness does not occur that the unintrusiveness does not occur but the prolateness happens is incorrect. sent3: that the ipsilateralness happens and the prolateness occurs causes that the unintrusiveness occurs. sent4: that the backgrounding does not occur prevents the unintrusiveness. sent5: the abactinalness is prevented by that the recission does not occur and the ipsilateralness occurs. sent6: if the recission does not occur then that the postwarness happens and the Icelandicness happens does not hold. sent7: the cantonalness does not occur. sent8: the whelping Bartlett does not occur and the irreverence does not occur if the prolateness happens. sent9: if the background occurs then the whelping Bartlett happens. sent10: the watching does not occur and/or the anticyclone does not occur. sent11: that the recission does not occur and the ipsilateralness occurs is caused by the prolateness. sent12: if the anticyclone does not occur then the watch happens and the background happens. sent13: that the unintrusiveness happens is triggered by that the ipsilateralness but not the prolateness happens. sent14: the whelping Bartlett does not occur if the postwarness occurs. sent15: that the postwarness occurs and the Icelandic occurs does not hold. sent16: if the recission occurs then the ipsilateralness happens. sent17: that the irreverence does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if that the postwarness does not occur but the Icelandicness happens is not true then the whelping Bartlett does not occur. sent19: that the fact that not the whelping example but the Aleutianness occurs is true is incorrect. sent20: that the Merovingian does not occur yields that the subversion does not occur. sent21: the whelping Bartlett prevents that the postwarness occurs. sent22: that the anticyclone does not occur results in the background. sent23: if that the utilizing does not occur is true the fact that the inconsiderableness does not occur and the raising happens is not right. sent24: the backgrounding does not occur if the anticyclone does not occur. sent25: that the irreverence occurs causes that the whelping Bartlett happens or that the Icelandic does not occur or both.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the recission occurs.; sent16 & assump2 -> int1: the ipsilateralness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prolateness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ipsilateralness and the non-prolateness happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the unintrusiveness happens.;
the tapering does not occur and the abactinalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the whelping Bartlett does not occur and the irreverence does not occur if the prolateness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the recission does not occur then the fact that the postwarness does not occur and the Icelandic occurs does not hold. sent2: if the postwarness does not occur that the unintrusiveness does not occur but the prolateness happens is incorrect. sent3: that the ipsilateralness happens and the prolateness occurs causes that the unintrusiveness occurs. sent4: that the backgrounding does not occur prevents the unintrusiveness. sent5: the abactinalness is prevented by that the recission does not occur and the ipsilateralness occurs. sent6: if the recission does not occur then that the postwarness happens and the Icelandicness happens does not hold. sent7: the cantonalness does not occur. sent8: the whelping Bartlett does not occur and the irreverence does not occur if the prolateness happens. sent9: if the background occurs then the whelping Bartlett happens. sent10: the watching does not occur and/or the anticyclone does not occur. sent11: that the recission does not occur and the ipsilateralness occurs is caused by the prolateness. sent12: if the anticyclone does not occur then the watch happens and the background happens. sent13: that the unintrusiveness happens is triggered by that the ipsilateralness but not the prolateness happens. sent14: the whelping Bartlett does not occur if the postwarness occurs. sent15: that the postwarness occurs and the Icelandic occurs does not hold. sent16: if the recission occurs then the ipsilateralness happens. sent17: that the irreverence does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if that the postwarness does not occur but the Icelandicness happens is not true then the whelping Bartlett does not occur. sent19: that the fact that not the whelping example but the Aleutianness occurs is true is incorrect. sent20: that the Merovingian does not occur yields that the subversion does not occur. sent21: the whelping Bartlett prevents that the postwarness occurs. sent22: that the anticyclone does not occur results in the background. sent23: if that the utilizing does not occur is true the fact that the inconsiderableness does not occur and the raising happens is not right. sent24: the backgrounding does not occur if the anticyclone does not occur. sent25: that the irreverence occurs causes that the whelping Bartlett happens or that the Icelandic does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the recission occurs.; sent16 & assump2 -> int1: the ipsilateralness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prolateness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ipsilateralness and the non-prolateness happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the unintrusiveness happens.; __UNKNOWN__