the albatross is a gomphothere.
sent1: if something does fret militant and it does clarion then the opener does polish. sent2: the heron does remit. sent3: if there exists something such that it is a mafioso the fact that the suffragette is not a kind of a clarion but it is scalic is incorrect. sent4: the feedback is a kind of a remit. sent5: if the ND is not a papulovesicle then the hyrax is a mafioso and it redes leverage. sent6: if the heron does remit then it is ceremonious. sent7: the fact that the lacework is not a battue but it is improvident is false. sent8: the albatross is a gomphothere if that the heron is ceremonious hold. sent9: the heron is a gomphothere. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not on-the-job then the dictyosome redes Garfield and it does fret militant. sent11: if the opener is a kind of a polish then that the heron does not remit and is ceremonious does not hold. sent12: if the fact that the suffragette is both not a clarion and scalic is not correct the dictyosome is a clarion. sent13: the lacework is non-on-the-job if that it is not a battue and it is improvident is wrong. sent14: the sabot is ceremonious. sent15: the ND is not a papulovesicle.
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the heron is ceremonious hold.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the albatross is not a gomphothere.
sent13 & sent7 -> int2: the lacework is not on-the-job.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not on-the-job.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the dictyosome does rede Garfield and it frets militant.; int4 -> int5: the dictyosome frets militant.; sent5 & sent15 -> int6: the hyrax is a kind of a mafioso and it redes leverage.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the hyrax is a mafioso is not false.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a mafioso.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: that the suffragette is not a clarion and is scalic is false.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the dictyosome is a kind of a clarion.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the dictyosome frets militant and it is a clarion.; int11 -> int12: something does fret militant and it is a clarion.; int12 & sent1 -> int13: the fact that the opener is a polish is not wrong.; sent11 & int13 -> int14: that the heron is not a remit and is ceremonious is not correct.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a remit and it is not non-ceremonious does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the albatross is a gomphothere. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does fret militant and it does clarion then the opener does polish. sent2: the heron does remit. sent3: if there exists something such that it is a mafioso the fact that the suffragette is not a kind of a clarion but it is scalic is incorrect. sent4: the feedback is a kind of a remit. sent5: if the ND is not a papulovesicle then the hyrax is a mafioso and it redes leverage. sent6: if the heron does remit then it is ceremonious. sent7: the fact that the lacework is not a battue but it is improvident is false. sent8: the albatross is a gomphothere if that the heron is ceremonious hold. sent9: the heron is a gomphothere. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not on-the-job then the dictyosome redes Garfield and it does fret militant. sent11: if the opener is a kind of a polish then that the heron does not remit and is ceremonious does not hold. sent12: if the fact that the suffragette is both not a clarion and scalic is not correct the dictyosome is a clarion. sent13: the lacework is non-on-the-job if that it is not a battue and it is improvident is wrong. sent14: the sabot is ceremonious. sent15: the ND is not a papulovesicle. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the heron is ceremonious hold.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__