the cynodont is not ventilatory.
sent1: the antiquark does consternate scatology if the bunk does not disentangle pie. sent2: the bunk does consternate scatology and/or it is a Virgil. sent3: something is not ventilatory if that it does not strengthen nitrobacterium and is ventilatory does not hold. sent4: if the bunk is ventilatory that the cynodont does consternate scatology is right. sent5: the topaz consternates mycelium. sent6: the bunk is monochromatic if the blackface is a prince's-plume. sent7: the fact that the cynodont is ventilatory is not false if there is something such that it consternates scatology. sent8: the cynodont is ventilatory and/or it does not consternate scatology. sent9: the Mackem is not a kind of a no. sent10: if the blackface is not non-monochromatic then the bunk is a prince's-plume. sent11: the cynodont is ventilatory if there is something such that it is monochromatic or consternates scatology or both. sent12: the blackface is a prince's-plume if the antiquark is not a kind of a Virgil. sent13: the bunk is monochromatic if there exists something such that it is ventilatory. sent14: the antiquark does disentangle pie or is not a Virgil or both. sent15: if the antiquark disentangles pie then the blackface is a kind of a prince's-plume. sent16: the bunk is a kind of a prince's-plume or it is monochromatic or both. sent17: the cynodont is not ventilatory if the antiquark is a kind of non-ventilatory thing that disentangles pie. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a no hold then that the antiquark does not strengthen nitrobacterium and is ventilatory is not right. sent19: the blackface is centered. sent20: the antiquark is a prince's-plume and/or does disentangle pie. sent21: if that the bunk is not monochromatic hold the antiquark is a kind of a prince's-plume and/or it is a kind of a Virgil. sent22: that the blackface is monochromatic and it does consternate scatology is not right. sent23: the cynodont is a prince's-plume if the fact that the blackface is ventilatory hold. sent24: that the antiquark either is Ugandan or does wet or both hold.
sent14 & sent15 & sent12 -> int1: the blackface is a prince's-plume.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the bunk is monochromatic.; int2 -> int3: the bunk is monochromatic and/or does consternate scatology.; int3 -> int4: either something is monochromatic or it consternates scatology or both.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the cynodont is not ventilatory.
sent3 -> int5: the antiquark is not ventilatory if the fact that it does not strengthen nitrobacterium and it is ventilatory is incorrect.; sent9 -> int6: there is something such that it is not a no.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the fact that the antiquark does not strengthen nitrobacterium but it is ventilatory does not hold.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the antiquark is not ventilatory is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the cynodont is not ventilatory. ; $context$ = sent1: the antiquark does consternate scatology if the bunk does not disentangle pie. sent2: the bunk does consternate scatology and/or it is a Virgil. sent3: something is not ventilatory if that it does not strengthen nitrobacterium and is ventilatory does not hold. sent4: if the bunk is ventilatory that the cynodont does consternate scatology is right. sent5: the topaz consternates mycelium. sent6: the bunk is monochromatic if the blackface is a prince's-plume. sent7: the fact that the cynodont is ventilatory is not false if there is something such that it consternates scatology. sent8: the cynodont is ventilatory and/or it does not consternate scatology. sent9: the Mackem is not a kind of a no. sent10: if the blackface is not non-monochromatic then the bunk is a prince's-plume. sent11: the cynodont is ventilatory if there is something such that it is monochromatic or consternates scatology or both. sent12: the blackface is a prince's-plume if the antiquark is not a kind of a Virgil. sent13: the bunk is monochromatic if there exists something such that it is ventilatory. sent14: the antiquark does disentangle pie or is not a Virgil or both. sent15: if the antiquark disentangles pie then the blackface is a kind of a prince's-plume. sent16: the bunk is a kind of a prince's-plume or it is monochromatic or both. sent17: the cynodont is not ventilatory if the antiquark is a kind of non-ventilatory thing that disentangles pie. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a no hold then that the antiquark does not strengthen nitrobacterium and is ventilatory is not right. sent19: the blackface is centered. sent20: the antiquark is a prince's-plume and/or does disentangle pie. sent21: if that the bunk is not monochromatic hold the antiquark is a kind of a prince's-plume and/or it is a kind of a Virgil. sent22: that the blackface is monochromatic and it does consternate scatology is not right. sent23: the cynodont is a prince's-plume if the fact that the blackface is ventilatory hold. sent24: that the antiquark either is Ugandan or does wet or both hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent15 & sent12 -> int1: the blackface is a prince's-plume.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the bunk is monochromatic.; int2 -> int3: the bunk is monochromatic and/or does consternate scatology.; int3 -> int4: either something is monochromatic or it consternates scatology or both.; int4 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__