the pesto is a kind of a sneak that is not a left-hander.
sent1: if the muzzle is anoperineal then the modification pockmarks. sent2: if a non-anoperineal thing vociferates the fact that the carter does not deny modification is correct. sent3: the fact that the muzzle is not guttural but it vociferates is wrong if the modification does not deny modification. sent4: something is a left-hander and it is anoperineal if it is not a pockmark. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-anoperineal thing that denies centralism. sent6: the muzzle is not unintrusive. sent7: the modification does not deny modification if it sneaks and it denies centralism. sent8: the pesto is not a left-hander but unintrusive. sent9: that the modification is unintrusive and it is a kind of a guttural is incorrect. sent10: the pesto is unintrusive if there is something such that that it is not indistinct and is a rumble is false. sent11: if the fact that the modification is both a rumble and not guttural is incorrect it is a guttural. sent12: if the carter does not deny modification then the pesto does sneak but it is not a left-hander. sent13: that the modification is a kind of a rumble and is non-guttural does not hold. sent14: if the muzzle is not unintrusive then it vociferates and denies centralism. sent15: if something does pockmark then it is not a guttural. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is non-indistinct thing that is a rumble is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the muzzle is anoperineal.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the modification is a pockmark.; sent15 -> int2: if the modification is a pockmark it is not guttural.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the modification is not a guttural.; sent11 & sent13 -> int4: the modification is a guttural.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the muzzle is not anoperineal is not false.; sent14 & sent6 -> int7: the muzzle does vociferate and it denies centralism.; int7 -> int8: the muzzle vociferates.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the muzzle is not anoperineal but it vociferates.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not anoperineal and it does vociferate.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the carter does not deny modification.; int11 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the carter is a left-hander.
sent4 -> int12: if the carter is not a pockmark then it is a kind of a left-hander that is anoperineal.; sent16 & sent10 -> int13: the pesto is unintrusive.; int13 -> int14: there are unintrusive things.;
$hypothesis$ = the pesto is a kind of a sneak that is not a left-hander. ; $context$ = sent1: if the muzzle is anoperineal then the modification pockmarks. sent2: if a non-anoperineal thing vociferates the fact that the carter does not deny modification is correct. sent3: the fact that the muzzle is not guttural but it vociferates is wrong if the modification does not deny modification. sent4: something is a left-hander and it is anoperineal if it is not a pockmark. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-anoperineal thing that denies centralism. sent6: the muzzle is not unintrusive. sent7: the modification does not deny modification if it sneaks and it denies centralism. sent8: the pesto is not a left-hander but unintrusive. sent9: that the modification is unintrusive and it is a kind of a guttural is incorrect. sent10: the pesto is unintrusive if there is something such that that it is not indistinct and is a rumble is false. sent11: if the fact that the modification is both a rumble and not guttural is incorrect it is a guttural. sent12: if the carter does not deny modification then the pesto does sneak but it is not a left-hander. sent13: that the modification is a kind of a rumble and is non-guttural does not hold. sent14: if the muzzle is not unintrusive then it vociferates and denies centralism. sent15: if something does pockmark then it is not a guttural. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it is non-indistinct thing that is a rumble is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the muzzle is anoperineal.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the modification is a pockmark.; sent15 -> int2: if the modification is a pockmark it is not guttural.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the modification is not a guttural.; sent11 & sent13 -> int4: the modification is a guttural.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the muzzle is not anoperineal is not false.; sent14 & sent6 -> int7: the muzzle does vociferate and it denies centralism.; int7 -> int8: the muzzle vociferates.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the muzzle is not anoperineal but it vociferates.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not anoperineal and it does vociferate.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the carter does not deny modification.; int11 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__