the Mull is not a pawer.
sent1: if the fact that that the Mull does not unclothe Nintu and is not non-horticultural is not incorrect is not right then it is a kind of a pawer. sent2: the fact that something is not a kind of a pawer and/or it is not a kind of a NIDDM is wrong if it is not a feast. sent3: the kilt is not a NIDDM. sent4: if the Mull does not unclothe Nintu but it is horticultural then the kilt is a kind of a NIDDM.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mull does not unclothe Nintu but it is horticultural.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the kilt is a kind of a NIDDM.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Mull does not unclothe Nintu but it is horticultural is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the handlebar is not horticultural.
sent2 -> int4: the fact that the Mull is either not a pawer or not a NIDDM or both is false if it does not feast.;
$hypothesis$ = the Mull is not a pawer. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that that the Mull does not unclothe Nintu and is not non-horticultural is not incorrect is not right then it is a kind of a pawer. sent2: the fact that something is not a kind of a pawer and/or it is not a kind of a NIDDM is wrong if it is not a feast. sent3: the kilt is not a NIDDM. sent4: if the Mull does not unclothe Nintu but it is horticultural then the kilt is a kind of a NIDDM. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Mull does not unclothe Nintu but it is horticultural.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the kilt is a kind of a NIDDM.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Mull does not unclothe Nintu but it is horticultural is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__