the inextinguishableness does not occur and the distantness occurs.
sent1: the bloviating occurs. sent2: that the lacing patisserie occurs brings about that the streaking does not occur but the alvineness happens. sent3: that the scapularness does not occur yields that the favorableness happens and the uncooperativeness occurs. sent4: if both the alvineness and the motorization occurs then the scapular does not occur. sent5: the parsing drawer happens. sent6: the fact that the cyprinid happens hold. sent7: that the inextinguishableness does not occur and/or that the parsing vara does not occur prevents that the inextinguishableness happens. sent8: if the philanthropicness does not occur then that the inextinguishableness does not occur but the distantness happens is not right. sent9: that the uncooperativeness occurs brings about that the subscription does not occur and the demolition does not occur. sent10: if the philanthropicness happens that the distantness occurs is not false. sent11: the philanthropicness is prevented by that the parsing vara does not occur and the subscription does not occur. sent12: either the inextinguishableness happens or the parsing vara does not occur or both. sent13: the subscription occurs. sent14: the philanthropicness happens and the subscription happens. sent15: the lacing patisserie happens. sent16: the inextinguishableness does not occur or the parsing vara does not occur or both.
sent14 -> int1: the philanthropicness happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the distantness happens.; sent7 & sent16 -> int3: the fact that the inextinguishableness does not occur is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the inextinguishableness does not occur but the distantness occurs is not right.
sent2 & sent15 -> int4: not the streaking but the alvineness happens.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the alvineness does not occur is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the inextinguishableness does not occur and the distantness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the bloviating occurs. sent2: that the lacing patisserie occurs brings about that the streaking does not occur but the alvineness happens. sent3: that the scapularness does not occur yields that the favorableness happens and the uncooperativeness occurs. sent4: if both the alvineness and the motorization occurs then the scapular does not occur. sent5: the parsing drawer happens. sent6: the fact that the cyprinid happens hold. sent7: that the inextinguishableness does not occur and/or that the parsing vara does not occur prevents that the inextinguishableness happens. sent8: if the philanthropicness does not occur then that the inextinguishableness does not occur but the distantness happens is not right. sent9: that the uncooperativeness occurs brings about that the subscription does not occur and the demolition does not occur. sent10: if the philanthropicness happens that the distantness occurs is not false. sent11: the philanthropicness is prevented by that the parsing vara does not occur and the subscription does not occur. sent12: either the inextinguishableness happens or the parsing vara does not occur or both. sent13: the subscription occurs. sent14: the philanthropicness happens and the subscription happens. sent15: the lacing patisserie happens. sent16: the inextinguishableness does not occur or the parsing vara does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the philanthropicness happens.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the distantness happens.; sent7 & sent16 -> int3: the fact that the inextinguishableness does not occur is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__