if the gnomicness occurs the disobeying does not occur and the etherealness does not occur.
sent1: the muffled occurs. sent2: if the sliming dentition does not occur the muffled happens. sent3: not the disobeying but the muffling occurs if the sliming dentition does not occur. sent4: that the gnomicness happens and the gubernatorialness does not occur brings about that the etherealness does not occur. sent5: the gubernatorialness does not occur. sent6: the fact that if that that the improvidentness happens and the gnomicness happens is not correct is not incorrect the improvidentness does not occur is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gnomicness happens.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: both the gnomicness and the non-gubernatorialness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the etherealness does not occur.;
the improvidentness does not occur and the sliming acquiescence does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the gnomicness occurs the disobeying does not occur and the etherealness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the muffled occurs. sent2: if the sliming dentition does not occur the muffled happens. sent3: not the disobeying but the muffling occurs if the sliming dentition does not occur. sent4: that the gnomicness happens and the gubernatorialness does not occur brings about that the etherealness does not occur. sent5: the gubernatorialness does not occur. sent6: the fact that if that that the improvidentness happens and the gnomicness happens is not correct is not incorrect the improvidentness does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gnomicness happens.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: both the gnomicness and the non-gubernatorialness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the etherealness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__