the short-stop predates march.
sent1: the short-stop homes and does predate march if the mayhaw does not squinch Bartok. sent2: if the fact that the margate is a shame is right it does not predate airflow. sent3: the fact that the settlor does not grin and does not squinch Bartok is false if the mate is a homing. sent4: the fact that something does not shame but it does squinch firstborn is wrong if it does not predate airflow. sent5: something does not squinch Bartok if that it grins and it predates airflow is not right. sent6: if that the margate does not predate airflow is not false that the mayhaw grins and predate airflow is not true. sent7: if that the mayhaw is not a shame and squinches firstborn is false then the fact that the margate predates march hold. sent8: the short-stop does not predate march if the margate predate march. sent9: if there exists something such that it does squinch firstborn the margate shames. sent10: that there exists something such that it does squinch firstborn is correct.
sent10 & sent9 -> int1: the margate does shame.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the margate does not predate airflow.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that the mayhaw grins and it does predate airflow is not right.; sent5 -> int4: the mayhaw does not squinch Bartok if the fact that it grins and it does predate airflow is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mayhaw does not squinch Bartok.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the short-stop is a homing that does predate march.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the short-stop does not predate march is not wrong.
sent4 -> int7: the fact that the mayhaw is not a shame but it squinches firstborn is not correct if that it does not predate airflow hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the short-stop predates march. ; $context$ = sent1: the short-stop homes and does predate march if the mayhaw does not squinch Bartok. sent2: if the fact that the margate is a shame is right it does not predate airflow. sent3: the fact that the settlor does not grin and does not squinch Bartok is false if the mate is a homing. sent4: the fact that something does not shame but it does squinch firstborn is wrong if it does not predate airflow. sent5: something does not squinch Bartok if that it grins and it predates airflow is not right. sent6: if that the margate does not predate airflow is not false that the mayhaw grins and predate airflow is not true. sent7: if that the mayhaw is not a shame and squinches firstborn is false then the fact that the margate predates march hold. sent8: the short-stop does not predate march if the margate predate march. sent9: if there exists something such that it does squinch firstborn the margate shames. sent10: that there exists something such that it does squinch firstborn is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent9 -> int1: the margate does shame.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the margate does not predate airflow.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that the mayhaw grins and it does predate airflow is not right.; sent5 -> int4: the mayhaw does not squinch Bartok if the fact that it grins and it does predate airflow is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the mayhaw does not squinch Bartok.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the short-stop is a homing that does predate march.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__