both the non-acculturationalness and the non-necessariness happens.
sent1: the replacement does not occur. sent2: the araneidalness happens. sent3: that the reissuing margin does not occur is brought about by the snowballing transalpine. sent4: the dulling does not occur. sent5: the fact that the polemoniaceousness does not occur and the incarnation does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the attitudinalness does not occur and the displacement does not occur is not correct the floralness happens. sent7: the necessariness does not occur. sent8: that the fact that both the necessariness and the non-acculturationalness occurs is false if the attitudinalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: that the replacement and the non-extrospectiveness happens brings about the snowballing twilight. sent10: if both the shogi and the non-tenseness occurs the snowballing incorruptness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the displacement does not occur and the summating does not occur is wrong if that the Baptisticness does not occur is right. sent12: the perfection does not occur. sent13: that the consternating TELINT occurs causes that the non-unpatrioticness and the non-Baptisticness occurs. sent14: if the reissuing margin does not occur both the consternating TELINT and the bundling occurs. sent15: the snowballing hutment happens. sent16: that the attitudinalness but not the displacement happens is not right. sent17: if the extrospectiveness happens then that the replacement occurs is not false. sent18: the fact that the floralness happens hold if the attitudinalness occurs. sent19: the fact that the attitudinalness does not occur and the displacement does not occur does not hold. sent20: that the acculturationalness happens is prevented by that the floralness and the non-extrospectiveness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extrospectiveness occurs.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the replacement happens is correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the extrospectiveness does not occur.; sent6 & sent19 -> int4: the floralness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: both the floralness and the non-extrospectiveness happens.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the acculturationalness does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that both the non-acculturationalness and the unnecessaryness occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = both the non-acculturationalness and the non-necessariness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the replacement does not occur. sent2: the araneidalness happens. sent3: that the reissuing margin does not occur is brought about by the snowballing transalpine. sent4: the dulling does not occur. sent5: the fact that the polemoniaceousness does not occur and the incarnation does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the attitudinalness does not occur and the displacement does not occur is not correct the floralness happens. sent7: the necessariness does not occur. sent8: that the fact that both the necessariness and the non-acculturationalness occurs is false if the attitudinalness does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: that the replacement and the non-extrospectiveness happens brings about the snowballing twilight. sent10: if both the shogi and the non-tenseness occurs the snowballing incorruptness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the displacement does not occur and the summating does not occur is wrong if that the Baptisticness does not occur is right. sent12: the perfection does not occur. sent13: that the consternating TELINT occurs causes that the non-unpatrioticness and the non-Baptisticness occurs. sent14: if the reissuing margin does not occur both the consternating TELINT and the bundling occurs. sent15: the snowballing hutment happens. sent16: that the attitudinalness but not the displacement happens is not right. sent17: if the extrospectiveness happens then that the replacement occurs is not false. sent18: the fact that the floralness happens hold if the attitudinalness occurs. sent19: the fact that the attitudinalness does not occur and the displacement does not occur does not hold. sent20: that the acculturationalness happens is prevented by that the floralness and the non-extrospectiveness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extrospectiveness occurs.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the replacement happens is correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the extrospectiveness does not occur.; sent6 & sent19 -> int4: the floralness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: both the floralness and the non-extrospectiveness happens.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the acculturationalness does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__