that the banker is not cenogenetic hold.
sent1: if the fact that something is not non-eolithic but it is not a hypostatization is false then it is phonetics. sent2: the capon is not a paster if it is not a vine and not a Ling-pao. sent3: that the beekeeper does not torment Garbo is right. sent4: if that the beekeeper is phonetics is not incorrect the Poivrade does not troop shoddy. sent5: the ketosteroid is not eolithic. sent6: the banker is non-phonetics if the beekeeper is cenogenetic. sent7: the banker is non-radiopaque thing that does not torment Garbo. sent8: something is not a hypostatization if that it is not cenogenetic and not phonetics is not correct. sent9: if the beekeeper is a kind of a paster the capon is not eolithic. sent10: the banker is not a vine. sent11: the banker is cenogenetic if the Poivrade does not troop shoddy. sent12: that if that the beekeeper is phonetics and is not the vine does not hold then the fact that the beekeeper does troop cobble hold is not false. sent13: if the capon does not troop cobble then that the beekeeper is eolithic and is not a hypostatization is false. sent14: the Poivrade is not phonetics if the fact that the fact that it is not eolithic and it does not troop shoddy is true is not true. sent15: the capon is a paster if it torments Garbo. sent16: if the Poivrade does troop cobble then that the capon does not troop shoddy is not false. sent17: that the capon does not troop cobble and it does not mistake Pompey is not correct. sent18: if that something is not a vine and not a Ling-pao is not right it does not troop cobble. sent19: The Garbo torments capon. sent20: the beekeeper does not troop shoddy if that it is both not phonetics and not eolithic is wrong. sent21: if the beekeeper does not troop cobble then that the capon is cenogenetic but not eolithic is not correct. sent22: the capon torments Garbo. sent23: the monkey-wrench does torment banker if it is viral. sent24: if the fact that the Poivrade does troop shoddy is correct it is a vine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the capon is not a vine and it is not a Ling-pao.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the capon is not a kind of a paster.; sent15 & sent22 -> int2: the capon is a paster.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the capon is both not a vine and not a Ling-pao is not right.; sent18 -> int5: if that the capon is not a vine and is not a Ling-pao is incorrect it does not troop cobble.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the capon does not troop cobble.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the beekeeper is eolithic but it is not a hypostatization is not right.; sent1 -> int8: the beekeeper is phonetics if that it is eolithic and not a hypostatization is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the beekeeper is phonetics.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the Poivrade does not troop shoddy.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the banker is not cenogenetic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not non-eolithic but it is not a hypostatization is false then it is phonetics. sent2: the capon is not a paster if it is not a vine and not a Ling-pao. sent3: that the beekeeper does not torment Garbo is right. sent4: if that the beekeeper is phonetics is not incorrect the Poivrade does not troop shoddy. sent5: the ketosteroid is not eolithic. sent6: the banker is non-phonetics if the beekeeper is cenogenetic. sent7: the banker is non-radiopaque thing that does not torment Garbo. sent8: something is not a hypostatization if that it is not cenogenetic and not phonetics is not correct. sent9: if the beekeeper is a kind of a paster the capon is not eolithic. sent10: the banker is not a vine. sent11: the banker is cenogenetic if the Poivrade does not troop shoddy. sent12: that if that the beekeeper is phonetics and is not the vine does not hold then the fact that the beekeeper does troop cobble hold is not false. sent13: if the capon does not troop cobble then that the beekeeper is eolithic and is not a hypostatization is false. sent14: the Poivrade is not phonetics if the fact that the fact that it is not eolithic and it does not troop shoddy is true is not true. sent15: the capon is a paster if it torments Garbo. sent16: if the Poivrade does troop cobble then that the capon does not troop shoddy is not false. sent17: that the capon does not troop cobble and it does not mistake Pompey is not correct. sent18: if that something is not a vine and not a Ling-pao is not right it does not troop cobble. sent19: The Garbo torments capon. sent20: the beekeeper does not troop shoddy if that it is both not phonetics and not eolithic is wrong. sent21: if the beekeeper does not troop cobble then that the capon is cenogenetic but not eolithic is not correct. sent22: the capon torments Garbo. sent23: the monkey-wrench does torment banker if it is viral. sent24: if the fact that the Poivrade does troop shoddy is correct it is a vine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the capon is not a vine and it is not a Ling-pao.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the capon is not a kind of a paster.; sent15 & sent22 -> int2: the capon is a paster.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the capon is both not a vine and not a Ling-pao is not right.; sent18 -> int5: if that the capon is not a vine and is not a Ling-pao is incorrect it does not troop cobble.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the capon does not troop cobble.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the beekeeper is eolithic but it is not a hypostatization is not right.; sent1 -> int8: the beekeeper is phonetics if that it is eolithic and not a hypostatization is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the beekeeper is phonetics.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the Poivrade does not troop shoddy.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__