the fact that something is a Verbascum and it is annalistic is not true.
sent1: that something ammoniates troy is not wrong. sent2: the chess is annalistic. sent3: the drumstick is a wincey. sent4: the drumstick is a kind of a wincey and it is magnetic. sent5: if the thermopile does not clank autoeroticism then that the clip is not a kind of a wincey and is not a kind of a fleapit is wrong. sent6: something is a Verbascum. sent7: the fact that the beret is annalistic thing that is not magnetic is incorrect if something is a wincey. sent8: if there exists something such that that it ammoniates troy and it is magnetic is true then the beret is a kind of a Verbascum. sent9: the thermopile does not clank autoeroticism. sent10: the drumstick is a TELINT. sent11: there is something such that it is magnetic. sent12: that something is a kind of a wincey if that it is not a kind of a wincey and it is not a kind of a fleapit is false is not false. sent13: the drumstick is annalistic. sent14: there exists something such that that it is annalistic is right. sent15: if the drumstick is a Verbascum the stapler is a Verbascum. sent16: if the fact that the drumstick is a TELINT is not false then it ammoniates troy. sent17: the beret is a TELINT. sent18: the beret is annalistic.
sent16 & sent10 -> int1: the drumstick does ammoniate troy.; sent4 -> int2: the drumstick is magnetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the drumstick does ammoniate troy and it is magnetic.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does ammoniate troy and it is magnetic.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the beret is a Verbascum.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the fact that the beret is a Verbascum and is annalistic hold.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the stapler is a Verbascum.
sent12 -> int7: if the fact that the clip is not a wincey and it is not a kind of a fleapit is not right then it is a kind of a wincey.; sent5 & sent9 -> int8: that the clip is not a wincey and not a fleapit is not true.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the clip is a wincey.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a wincey.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the fact that the beret is annalistic but not magnetic is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is a Verbascum and it is annalistic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that something ammoniates troy is not wrong. sent2: the chess is annalistic. sent3: the drumstick is a wincey. sent4: the drumstick is a kind of a wincey and it is magnetic. sent5: if the thermopile does not clank autoeroticism then that the clip is not a kind of a wincey and is not a kind of a fleapit is wrong. sent6: something is a Verbascum. sent7: the fact that the beret is annalistic thing that is not magnetic is incorrect if something is a wincey. sent8: if there exists something such that that it ammoniates troy and it is magnetic is true then the beret is a kind of a Verbascum. sent9: the thermopile does not clank autoeroticism. sent10: the drumstick is a TELINT. sent11: there is something such that it is magnetic. sent12: that something is a kind of a wincey if that it is not a kind of a wincey and it is not a kind of a fleapit is false is not false. sent13: the drumstick is annalistic. sent14: there exists something such that that it is annalistic is right. sent15: if the drumstick is a Verbascum the stapler is a Verbascum. sent16: if the fact that the drumstick is a TELINT is not false then it ammoniates troy. sent17: the beret is a TELINT. sent18: the beret is annalistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent10 -> int1: the drumstick does ammoniate troy.; sent4 -> int2: the drumstick is magnetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the drumstick does ammoniate troy and it is magnetic.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does ammoniate troy and it is magnetic.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the beret is a Verbascum.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the fact that the beret is a Verbascum and is annalistic hold.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__