the belt does abdicate scented.
sent1: the fact that the four-in-hand tweedles spur but it is not a velleity is not true. sent2: the declension does splutter exacerbation if it is not a kind of a piety. sent3: the lollipop does tweedle spur. sent4: if the crinkleroot does mine then that the heliotropism does not tweedle spur is true. sent5: the fact that the four-in-hand tweedles spur but it is not a velleity is incorrect if that the crinkleroot does not tweedles spur hold. sent6: if that something does not mine hold it does not splutter exacerbation or it is a kind of a piety or both. sent7: the heliotropism is not a piety. sent8: the heliotropism is not a kind of a velleity if there is something such that the fact that it does not tweedle spur and is not a Neandertal is wrong. sent9: the jack-in-the-pulpit is conquerable and not a modern. sent10: if the heliotropism is not a velleity the fact that the fact that the four-in-hand is not a kind of a velleity but it does mine is right is not correct. sent11: the declension does not tweedle insecureness. sent12: if there exists something such that it is conquerable the four-in-hand is not a backbench and it is not a priesthood. sent13: if the belt does not splutter exacerbation and/or it is a piety then it does not abdicate scented. sent14: the belt abdicates scented if the four-in-hand tweedles spur. sent15: if the four-in-hand splutters exacerbation then the declension tweedles spur. sent16: that the four-in-hand does not tweedle spur and is not a kind of a velleity is incorrect if the crinkleroot does not tweedle spur. sent17: that the declension does recombine capitate is right. sent18: the belt abdicates scented if that that the four-in-hand does not tweedle spur and it is not a velleity is not true hold. sent19: the heliotropism is a kind of a mine if the fact that the declension does splutter exacerbation is not wrong. sent20: the belt does tweedle spur. sent21: if the fact that the declension is both a mine and a velleity does not hold the belt does not mine. sent22: the crinkleroot does not tweedle spur if the heliotropism mines. sent23: that that the crinkleroot does not tweedle spur and is not a Neandertal is correct does not hold if the four-in-hand is not a backbench. sent24: that the declension does tweedle insecureness and/or it does not abdicate Midwest is not correct.
the belt does not abdicate scented.
sent6 -> int1: the belt does not splutter exacerbation and/or it is a kind of a piety if it is not a mine.; sent9 -> int2: the fact that the jack-in-the-pulpit is conquerable hold.; int2 -> int3: something is conquerable.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the four-in-hand is not a backbench and not a priesthood.; int4 -> int5: the four-in-hand is not a kind of a backbench.; sent23 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the crinkleroot does not tweedle spur and it is not a kind of a Neandertal is not true.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it does not tweedle spur and is not a kind of a Neandertal is wrong.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the heliotropism is not a velleity.; int8 -> int9: something is not a velleity.;
$hypothesis$ = the belt does abdicate scented. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the four-in-hand tweedles spur but it is not a velleity is not true. sent2: the declension does splutter exacerbation if it is not a kind of a piety. sent3: the lollipop does tweedle spur. sent4: if the crinkleroot does mine then that the heliotropism does not tweedle spur is true. sent5: the fact that the four-in-hand tweedles spur but it is not a velleity is incorrect if that the crinkleroot does not tweedles spur hold. sent6: if that something does not mine hold it does not splutter exacerbation or it is a kind of a piety or both. sent7: the heliotropism is not a piety. sent8: the heliotropism is not a kind of a velleity if there is something such that the fact that it does not tweedle spur and is not a Neandertal is wrong. sent9: the jack-in-the-pulpit is conquerable and not a modern. sent10: if the heliotropism is not a velleity the fact that the fact that the four-in-hand is not a kind of a velleity but it does mine is right is not correct. sent11: the declension does not tweedle insecureness. sent12: if there exists something such that it is conquerable the four-in-hand is not a backbench and it is not a priesthood. sent13: if the belt does not splutter exacerbation and/or it is a piety then it does not abdicate scented. sent14: the belt abdicates scented if the four-in-hand tweedles spur. sent15: if the four-in-hand splutters exacerbation then the declension tweedles spur. sent16: that the four-in-hand does not tweedle spur and is not a kind of a velleity is incorrect if the crinkleroot does not tweedle spur. sent17: that the declension does recombine capitate is right. sent18: the belt abdicates scented if that that the four-in-hand does not tweedle spur and it is not a velleity is not true hold. sent19: the heliotropism is a kind of a mine if the fact that the declension does splutter exacerbation is not wrong. sent20: the belt does tweedle spur. sent21: if the fact that the declension is both a mine and a velleity does not hold the belt does not mine. sent22: the crinkleroot does not tweedle spur if the heliotropism mines. sent23: that that the crinkleroot does not tweedle spur and is not a Neandertal is correct does not hold if the four-in-hand is not a backbench. sent24: that the declension does tweedle insecureness and/or it does not abdicate Midwest is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__