the fact that there exists something such that it is not non-aerodynamic is false.
sent1: the ecliptic does treat ramona. sent2: if the leatherjacket does not rival but it is Pauline then the bobby is aerodynamic. sent3: there is something such that it is an acetylcholine. sent4: if the ecliptic is genetics the leatherjacket is not a rival but Pauline. sent5: either something treats ramona or it is not an acetylcholine or both. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it either treats ramona or is not a kind of an acetylcholine or both is false then the ecliptic is genetics. sent7: the leatherjacket does not rival. sent8: if the ecliptic is genetics then the leatherjacket is not a rival. sent9: if there is something such that that it either does treat ramona or is an acetylcholine or both is false then the fact that the ecliptic is genetics is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the antioxidant treats ramona and/or it is not an acetylcholine is wrong.
sent10 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does treat ramona and/or is not an acetylcholine is not true.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the ecliptic is genetics.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the leatherjacket is not a rival but it is Pauline.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the bobby is aerodynamic.; int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is not non-aerodynamic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the ecliptic does treat ramona. sent2: if the leatherjacket does not rival but it is Pauline then the bobby is aerodynamic. sent3: there is something such that it is an acetylcholine. sent4: if the ecliptic is genetics the leatherjacket is not a rival but Pauline. sent5: either something treats ramona or it is not an acetylcholine or both. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it either treats ramona or is not a kind of an acetylcholine or both is false then the ecliptic is genetics. sent7: the leatherjacket does not rival. sent8: if the ecliptic is genetics then the leatherjacket is not a rival. sent9: if there is something such that that it either does treat ramona or is an acetylcholine or both is false then the fact that the ecliptic is genetics is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the antioxidant treats ramona and/or it is not an acetylcholine is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does treat ramona and/or is not an acetylcholine is not true.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the ecliptic is genetics.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the leatherjacket is not a rival but it is Pauline.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the bobby is aerodynamic.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__