the bornite is not a kind of a pulverization.
sent1: something is carpellary if the fact that it acts Galatian is true. sent2: the Villa is carpellary. sent3: if the bornite is a pulverization then the fact that it is a kind of non-internal thing that does condole Marxism does not hold. sent4: the bornite does not condole bornite. sent5: the bornite is not internal if the stipule is not a pulverization. sent6: that the stipule condoles hornpout and it does condole Marxism is not true if it is a kind of a pulverization. sent7: the Villa is not a pulverization. sent8: the Villa is non-carpellary if that the stipule does not condole hornpout but it does condole Marxism does not hold. sent9: if the stipule does condole hornpout the Villa is not carpellary. sent10: the bornite is not internal. sent11: if the Villa is not carpellary the stipule is not carpellary and does not condole Marxism. sent12: if the stipule is not a pulverization then the bornite is not a kind of a pulverization and is not internal. sent13: the bornite is carpellary. sent14: that the stipule condoles hornpout and does condole Marxism is wrong. sent15: if something is a kind of a pulverization then that it condoles hornpout and it condoles Marxism is incorrect.
the bornite is a pulverization.
sent1 -> int1: the bornite is carpellary if it does act Galatian.;
$hypothesis$ = the bornite is not a kind of a pulverization. ; $context$ = sent1: something is carpellary if the fact that it acts Galatian is true. sent2: the Villa is carpellary. sent3: if the bornite is a pulverization then the fact that it is a kind of non-internal thing that does condole Marxism does not hold. sent4: the bornite does not condole bornite. sent5: the bornite is not internal if the stipule is not a pulverization. sent6: that the stipule condoles hornpout and it does condole Marxism is not true if it is a kind of a pulverization. sent7: the Villa is not a pulverization. sent8: the Villa is non-carpellary if that the stipule does not condole hornpout but it does condole Marxism does not hold. sent9: if the stipule does condole hornpout the Villa is not carpellary. sent10: the bornite is not internal. sent11: if the Villa is not carpellary the stipule is not carpellary and does not condole Marxism. sent12: if the stipule is not a pulverization then the bornite is not a kind of a pulverization and is not internal. sent13: the bornite is carpellary. sent14: that the stipule condoles hornpout and does condole Marxism is wrong. sent15: if something is a kind of a pulverization then that it condoles hornpout and it condoles Marxism is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__