that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not roof paleomammalogy and it does not menstruate Phylloxeridae is not true it is not eradicable is not right.
sent1: the sextant does not efface fatigability if that it does not roof KGB and does not roof paleomammalogy is not correct. sent2: if the latchkey is non-uneventful thing that is not eradicable it does not fantasize. sent3: there is something such that if it is a turtle then it is not a pantie. sent4: that there is something such that if that it is not a washed and not orthographic does not hold that it is not a divorced hold is not false. sent5: there is something such that if it is a antiredeposition then it is not a stacks. sent6: that if that something is not a swine and is not a swelling is incorrect it is not a kind of a Asia is not false. sent7: there is something such that if it roofs layman then it is not a kind of a Rembrandt. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not tin feminization and it is not incorporeal it is not a Chippendale. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if that it is a squire and is not expansionist is wrong it is not a kind of a toddler hold. sent10: if that the yoke is not an imaging and does not menstruate Phylloxeridae is incorrect the fact that it does roof rebuttal is true. sent11: if that the latchkey is both not a hygiene and not fiduciary is wrong it is a kind of an embarrassment. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a twinjet that is not a chalet is not correct that it does not efface Connecticut hold. sent13: if that the latchkey does not roof paleomammalogy and it does not menstruate Phylloxeridae does not hold then it is not eradicable. sent14: that there is something such that if the fact that it does not sidetrack and it tins Khoikhoin is incorrect it is non-amaurotic is true. sent15: if the latchkey is an indicative then it is not eradicable. sent16: the fact that the feminization does not attach if the feminization roofs paleomammalogy is not false. sent17: there is something such that if that it does efface sextant is not incorrect then it does not sightsee. sent18: there is something such that if it menstruates Phylloxeridae then it is not eradicable. sent19: the fact that if that the latchkey does not roof paleomammalogy and it is not a kind of the toddler is not incorrect the latchkey is not a friar is not incorrect. sent20: the latchkey is communicative if that the fact that it is not rigid and it is not eradicable hold is incorrect.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the latchkey is not a swine and is not a swelling is not true then it is not a Asia.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it does not roof paleomammalogy and it does not menstruate Phylloxeridae is not true it is not eradicable is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the sextant does not efface fatigability if that it does not roof KGB and does not roof paleomammalogy is not correct. sent2: if the latchkey is non-uneventful thing that is not eradicable it does not fantasize. sent3: there is something such that if it is a turtle then it is not a pantie. sent4: that there is something such that if that it is not a washed and not orthographic does not hold that it is not a divorced hold is not false. sent5: there is something such that if it is a antiredeposition then it is not a stacks. sent6: that if that something is not a swine and is not a swelling is incorrect it is not a kind of a Asia is not false. sent7: there is something such that if it roofs layman then it is not a kind of a Rembrandt. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not tin feminization and it is not incorporeal it is not a Chippendale. sent9: the fact that there exists something such that if that it is a squire and is not expansionist is wrong it is not a kind of a toddler hold. sent10: if that the yoke is not an imaging and does not menstruate Phylloxeridae is incorrect the fact that it does roof rebuttal is true. sent11: if that the latchkey is both not a hygiene and not fiduciary is wrong it is a kind of an embarrassment. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a twinjet that is not a chalet is not correct that it does not efface Connecticut hold. sent13: if that the latchkey does not roof paleomammalogy and it does not menstruate Phylloxeridae does not hold then it is not eradicable. sent14: that there is something such that if the fact that it does not sidetrack and it tins Khoikhoin is incorrect it is non-amaurotic is true. sent15: if the latchkey is an indicative then it is not eradicable. sent16: the fact that the feminization does not attach if the feminization roofs paleomammalogy is not false. sent17: there is something such that if that it does efface sextant is not incorrect then it does not sightsee. sent18: there is something such that if it menstruates Phylloxeridae then it is not eradicable. sent19: the fact that if that the latchkey does not roof paleomammalogy and it is not a kind of the toddler is not incorrect the latchkey is not a friar is not incorrect. sent20: the latchkey is communicative if that the fact that it is not rigid and it is not eradicable hold is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__