the ketone is not an underpayment.
sent1: if something is not a counterreformation and it is not a Lascaux then the posterior is not receptive. sent2: the companion is not prenuptial and it is not receptive if something does not besot handset. sent3: if the posterior is not endometrial it is receptive and it does filter. sent4: the cyanohydrin is prenuptial if the companion besots handset. sent5: if something does not besot handset it is a kind of an underpayment and/or it is a counterreformation. sent6: the shoddy is both an epileptic and sericultural. sent7: if something is not a kind of a counterreformation then the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation and/or does not besot handset. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not besot handset is not incorrect then the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation. sent9: the cyanohydrin is sericultural. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a counterreformation and it is a Lascaux. sent11: the lizardfish is not receptive. sent12: the ketone is not an underpayment if the cyanohydrin is prenuptial thing that does subrogate memo. sent13: if the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation then the posterior is not sericultural. sent14: that that the ketone is not prenuptial but a Lascaux is not correct is correct. sent15: the cyanohydrin is sericultural and it subrogates memo. sent16: there is something such that it does not lysogenize giving. sent17: something lysogenizes giving. sent18: there exists something such that it does besot handset. sent19: there is something such that it is not a counterreformation. sent20: the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation. sent21: something is a counterreformation but it is not a Lascaux. sent22: the rink is not sericultural and it is not a kind of a Steinway. sent23: the posterior filters. sent24: something is not a Lascaux. sent25: the posterior is a kind of a filter if it is not endometrial. sent26: if something does not besot handset then the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation and not a Lascaux. sent27: the cyanohydrin is sericultural and it is a Lascaux.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the companion does not besot handset.; assump1 -> int1: something does not besot handset.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation and is not a Lascaux.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a counterreformation and it is not a kind of a Lascaux.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the posterior is not receptive.; sent15 -> int5: the cyanohydrin subrogates memo.;
that the posterior is not sericultural hold.
sent14 -> int6: there is something such that that it is not prenuptial and is a Lascaux is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the ketone is not an underpayment. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a counterreformation and it is not a Lascaux then the posterior is not receptive. sent2: the companion is not prenuptial and it is not receptive if something does not besot handset. sent3: if the posterior is not endometrial it is receptive and it does filter. sent4: the cyanohydrin is prenuptial if the companion besots handset. sent5: if something does not besot handset it is a kind of an underpayment and/or it is a counterreformation. sent6: the shoddy is both an epileptic and sericultural. sent7: if something is not a kind of a counterreformation then the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation and/or does not besot handset. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not besot handset is not incorrect then the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation. sent9: the cyanohydrin is sericultural. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a counterreformation and it is a Lascaux. sent11: the lizardfish is not receptive. sent12: the ketone is not an underpayment if the cyanohydrin is prenuptial thing that does subrogate memo. sent13: if the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation then the posterior is not sericultural. sent14: that that the ketone is not prenuptial but a Lascaux is not correct is correct. sent15: the cyanohydrin is sericultural and it subrogates memo. sent16: there is something such that it does not lysogenize giving. sent17: something lysogenizes giving. sent18: there exists something such that it does besot handset. sent19: there is something such that it is not a counterreformation. sent20: the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation. sent21: something is a counterreformation but it is not a Lascaux. sent22: the rink is not sericultural and it is not a kind of a Steinway. sent23: the posterior filters. sent24: something is not a Lascaux. sent25: the posterior is a kind of a filter if it is not endometrial. sent26: if something does not besot handset then the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation and not a Lascaux. sent27: the cyanohydrin is sericultural and it is a Lascaux. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the companion does not besot handset.; assump1 -> int1: something does not besot handset.; int1 & sent26 -> int2: the hand-me-down is not a counterreformation and is not a Lascaux.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not a counterreformation and it is not a kind of a Lascaux.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the posterior is not receptive.; sent15 -> int5: the cyanohydrin subrogates memo.; __UNKNOWN__