that that the lerot is an insensitivity and debriefs chantry hold is wrong.
sent1: the fact that that something is a kind of an insensitivity that does debrief chantry hold is not right if it is not sternutatory. sent2: if something is not sternutatory it is an imperial and it is shrubby. sent3: if the copperware is not an absolute the mahuang is a kind of non-sternutatory a hydroflumethiazide. sent4: the stork debriefs Euler or it is not a call-in or both. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a Ukrainian. sent6: if the lerot does not debrief chantry the fact that it is a samisen and it is sternutatory is incorrect. sent7: the mahuang does abandon diplodocus if it is a kind of a crook. sent8: the mahuang is not shrubby if the riser is a kind of an imperial and/or is a kind of a samisen. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a banana and/or does not investigate riser does not hold the copperware is not absolute. sent10: if the riser is shrubby or is a kind of an imperial or both the lerot is not sternutatory. sent11: if that the stork is not a Monera and it is not a kind of a bilaterality does not hold the riser does not investigate asserter. sent12: that the stork is not a kind of a Monera and it is not a kind of a bilaterality does not hold if it is not a call-in. sent13: the lerot is a kind of an insensitivity if the mahuang is a kind of an insensitivity. sent14: the lerot is not feverish. sent15: the mahuang crooks. sent16: something is an insensitivity if it is shrubby. sent17: if something does not investigate asserter then that the fact that it is not a crook and not a hollyhock hold is incorrect. sent18: if something does not diffuse subgenus it is an expressionist. sent19: that the lutist is not a banana and/or it does not investigate riser is not correct. sent20: the fact that the stork is not a kind of a call-in is true if that it does debrief Euler or it is not a kind of a call-in or both is not incorrect. sent21: if something is not a hollyhock then that it is shrubby is not wrong. sent22: if the mahuang is a crook then that it does not abandon diplodocus or it is a samisen or both is not correct. sent23: there is something such that it does abandon diplodocus.
sent22 & sent15 -> int1: that the mahuang does not abandon diplodocus and/or it is a samisen is false.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does not abandon diplodocus and/or it is a kind of a samisen is not true.; sent21 -> int3: if the riser is not a hollyhock then it is shrubby.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the lerot is an insensitivity and it does debrief chantry is not true if it is not sternutatory.;
the fact that the lerot is an insensitivity and debriefs chantry is right.
sent16 -> int5: the mahuang is an insensitivity if it is shrubby.; sent2 -> int6: the mahuang is an imperial and it is shrubby if it is not sternutatory.; sent19 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that that either it is not a banana or it does not investigate riser or both hold does not hold.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the copperware is not an absolute.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the mahuang is non-sternutatory a hydroflumethiazide.; int9 -> int10: the mahuang is not sternutatory.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the mahuang is an imperial and shrubby.; int11 -> int12: the mahuang is shrubby.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the mahuang is an insensitivity.; sent13 & int13 -> int14: the lerot is an insensitivity.; sent17 -> int15: if the riser does not investigate asserter that it does not crook and it is not a kind of a hollyhock is false.; sent20 & sent4 -> int16: the stork is not a call-in.; sent12 & int16 -> int17: that the stork is not a kind of a Monera and it is not a bilaterality does not hold.; sent11 & int17 -> int18: the riser does not investigate asserter.; int15 & int18 -> int19: the fact that the riser is both not a crook and not a hollyhock is not correct.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that the fact that it is not a crook and it is not a hollyhock does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the lerot is an insensitivity and debriefs chantry hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that something is a kind of an insensitivity that does debrief chantry hold is not right if it is not sternutatory. sent2: if something is not sternutatory it is an imperial and it is shrubby. sent3: if the copperware is not an absolute the mahuang is a kind of non-sternutatory a hydroflumethiazide. sent4: the stork debriefs Euler or it is not a call-in or both. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a Ukrainian. sent6: if the lerot does not debrief chantry the fact that it is a samisen and it is sternutatory is incorrect. sent7: the mahuang does abandon diplodocus if it is a kind of a crook. sent8: the mahuang is not shrubby if the riser is a kind of an imperial and/or is a kind of a samisen. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a banana and/or does not investigate riser does not hold the copperware is not absolute. sent10: if the riser is shrubby or is a kind of an imperial or both the lerot is not sternutatory. sent11: if that the stork is not a Monera and it is not a kind of a bilaterality does not hold the riser does not investigate asserter. sent12: that the stork is not a kind of a Monera and it is not a kind of a bilaterality does not hold if it is not a call-in. sent13: the lerot is a kind of an insensitivity if the mahuang is a kind of an insensitivity. sent14: the lerot is not feverish. sent15: the mahuang crooks. sent16: something is an insensitivity if it is shrubby. sent17: if something does not investigate asserter then that the fact that it is not a crook and not a hollyhock hold is incorrect. sent18: if something does not diffuse subgenus it is an expressionist. sent19: that the lutist is not a banana and/or it does not investigate riser is not correct. sent20: the fact that the stork is not a kind of a call-in is true if that it does debrief Euler or it is not a kind of a call-in or both is not incorrect. sent21: if something is not a hollyhock then that it is shrubby is not wrong. sent22: if the mahuang is a crook then that it does not abandon diplodocus or it is a samisen or both is not correct. sent23: there is something such that it does abandon diplodocus. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent15 -> int1: that the mahuang does not abandon diplodocus and/or it is a samisen is false.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it does not abandon diplodocus and/or it is a kind of a samisen is not true.; sent21 -> int3: if the riser is not a hollyhock then it is shrubby.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the lerot is an insensitivity and it does debrief chantry is not true if it is not sternutatory.; __UNKNOWN__