the alexandrite does not freckle Melampsoraceae.
sent1: the Croesus is not romaic if that there exists something such that it is not nonenzymatic and it is not an orifice is true. sent2: there is something such that that it is caffeinic is right. sent3: if the mire is not a Wigner then the alexandrite does freckle Melampsoraceae and is a Wigner. sent4: if something is a Wigner it is romaic. sent5: the fact that either the Croesus does not commutate or it is not entrepreneurial or both is not false if the fact that the trail is a showboat is false. sent6: there is something such that it is not nonenzymatic and it is a kind of an orifice. sent7: if there is something such that that it is not caffeinic is right the Croesus is romaic. sent8: if something is nonenzymatic then it is romaic. sent9: the trail is both not nonenzymatic and not an orifice. sent10: if that something is caffeinic and it is a Wigner is incorrect then it does not freckle Melampsoraceae. sent11: the trail is not a showboat. sent12: that the mire does violate but it is not an orifice is not correct if the love is not a Lilliput. sent13: there exists something such that it is not an atrocity. sent14: the alexandrite is not a showboat. sent15: if the fact that the mire is a kind of a Wigner is right then the love is not caffeinic. sent16: if the alexandrite is not a showboat then it does commutate. sent17: that the alexandrite is a kind of a Wigner is correct. sent18: that something is nonenzymatic but it is not an orifice is not true if it does not violate. sent19: the Croesus does not freckle Melampsoraceae. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both nonenzymatic and not an orifice is not true the mire does not freckle Melampsoraceae. sent21: if the alexandrite does commutate then that the fact that the Croesus is a Lilliput that is not entrepreneurial does not hold is true. sent22: that the love is not a kind of a Lilliput is not wrong if the Croesus does not commutate. sent23: the love does not violate if the fact that the Croesus is a Lilliput but not entrepreneurial is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mire is a Wigner.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the love is not caffeinic.; int1 -> int2: there are non-caffeinic things.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Croesus is romaic.; sent9 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not nonenzymatic and not an orifice.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the Croesus is not romaic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the mire is not a Wigner.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the alexandrite does freckle Melampsoraceae and it is a Wigner.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the icebreaker is romaic.
sent4 -> int9: the icebreaker is romaic if it is a kind of a Wigner.; sent18 -> int10: if the love does not violate the fact that it is a kind of nonenzymatic thing that is not an orifice is not correct.; sent16 & sent14 -> int11: the alexandrite commutates.; sent21 & int11 -> int12: the fact that that the Croesus is a Lilliput but it is not entrepreneurial hold is wrong.; sent23 & int12 -> int13: the love does not violate.; int10 & int13 -> int14: that the love is nonenzymatic but it is not an orifice is not correct.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that that it is nonenzymatic and it is not an orifice is true is wrong.; int15 & sent20 -> int16: the mire does not freckle Melampsoraceae.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it does not freckle Melampsoraceae.;
$hypothesis$ = the alexandrite does not freckle Melampsoraceae. ; $context$ = sent1: the Croesus is not romaic if that there exists something such that it is not nonenzymatic and it is not an orifice is true. sent2: there is something such that that it is caffeinic is right. sent3: if the mire is not a Wigner then the alexandrite does freckle Melampsoraceae and is a Wigner. sent4: if something is a Wigner it is romaic. sent5: the fact that either the Croesus does not commutate or it is not entrepreneurial or both is not false if the fact that the trail is a showboat is false. sent6: there is something such that it is not nonenzymatic and it is a kind of an orifice. sent7: if there is something such that that it is not caffeinic is right the Croesus is romaic. sent8: if something is nonenzymatic then it is romaic. sent9: the trail is both not nonenzymatic and not an orifice. sent10: if that something is caffeinic and it is a Wigner is incorrect then it does not freckle Melampsoraceae. sent11: the trail is not a showboat. sent12: that the mire does violate but it is not an orifice is not correct if the love is not a Lilliput. sent13: there exists something such that it is not an atrocity. sent14: the alexandrite is not a showboat. sent15: if the fact that the mire is a kind of a Wigner is right then the love is not caffeinic. sent16: if the alexandrite is not a showboat then it does commutate. sent17: that the alexandrite is a kind of a Wigner is correct. sent18: that something is nonenzymatic but it is not an orifice is not true if it does not violate. sent19: the Croesus does not freckle Melampsoraceae. sent20: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both nonenzymatic and not an orifice is not true the mire does not freckle Melampsoraceae. sent21: if the alexandrite does commutate then that the fact that the Croesus is a Lilliput that is not entrepreneurial does not hold is true. sent22: that the love is not a kind of a Lilliput is not wrong if the Croesus does not commutate. sent23: the love does not violate if the fact that the Croesus is a Lilliput but not entrepreneurial is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mire is a Wigner.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the love is not caffeinic.; int1 -> int2: there are non-caffeinic things.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Croesus is romaic.; sent9 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not nonenzymatic and not an orifice.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the Croesus is not romaic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the mire is not a Wigner.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the alexandrite does freckle Melampsoraceae and it is a Wigner.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__