that if the pitying ISN occurs then the antigenicness does not occur is not right.
sent1: the fact that that the supply happens and the pitying ISN occurs hold triggers the non-antigenicness. sent2: that the spitting happens is not false if that either the blastoff or the unworthiness or both happens is false. sent3: that the laughing occurs is correct. sent4: the stenographicness happens. sent5: if that the Lancastrian happens and/or the telegraphicness occurs is incorrect the condylarness occurs. sent6: the nasopharyngealness occurs. sent7: both the strafe and the trafficking occurs. sent8: the pitying ISN prevents the non-antigenicness. sent9: the plopping occurs. sent10: the fact that the fact that either the yodel occurs or the speleology does not occur or both is not true is not false. sent11: that the watch occurs hold if that the modernization happens or the e-commerce does not occur or both is not true. sent12: the fact that the incision happens hold if the fact that the playfulness and/or the absorbentness happens is not right. sent13: the supplying occurs if the fact that the teeoff happens and/or the section does not occur is not true. sent14: that the teeoff happens and/or the section does not occur is incorrect if the nasopharyngealness occurs. sent15: the quartanness happens and the hazing occurs.
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that either the teeoff occurs or the section does not occur or both is wrong.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the supply happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pitying ISN occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the supplying and the pitying ISN happens.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the antigenicness does not occur is not false.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the pitying ISN occurs then the antigenicness does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the supply happens and the pitying ISN occurs hold triggers the non-antigenicness. sent2: that the spitting happens is not false if that either the blastoff or the unworthiness or both happens is false. sent3: that the laughing occurs is correct. sent4: the stenographicness happens. sent5: if that the Lancastrian happens and/or the telegraphicness occurs is incorrect the condylarness occurs. sent6: the nasopharyngealness occurs. sent7: both the strafe and the trafficking occurs. sent8: the pitying ISN prevents the non-antigenicness. sent9: the plopping occurs. sent10: the fact that the fact that either the yodel occurs or the speleology does not occur or both is not true is not false. sent11: that the watch occurs hold if that the modernization happens or the e-commerce does not occur or both is not true. sent12: the fact that the incision happens hold if the fact that the playfulness and/or the absorbentness happens is not right. sent13: the supplying occurs if the fact that the teeoff happens and/or the section does not occur is not true. sent14: that the teeoff happens and/or the section does not occur is incorrect if the nasopharyngealness occurs. sent15: the quartanness happens and the hazing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that either the teeoff occurs or the section does not occur or both is wrong.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the supply happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pitying ISN occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the supplying and the pitying ISN happens.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the antigenicness does not occur is not false.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__