either the Algonquian reckons or it does not parch bugler or both.
sent1: if the dalmatian is both not a forelimb and not a pivot then it is not a trampler. sent2: the Algonquian either does reckon or does not parch bugler or both if that the costmary does not reckon hold. sent3: the dalmatian is not a forelimb and it does not pivot if the sequin is not a drug. sent4: the dalmatian is not a forelimb. sent5: the sequin does not parch half-sister. sent6: if the costmary is not a sterilization then it does not reckon and it is a spuriousness. sent7: the costmary is a kind of a spuriousness. sent8: the fact that the dalmatian is not a kind of a forelimb is true if the sequin is not a kind of a drug. sent9: if that the fact that the costmary does reckon is wrong is not false the Algonquian does reckon and/or it does parch bugler. sent10: the fact that the sequin does not parch half-sister and it is not a blight is incorrect if that it is a drug hold. sent11: if the dalmatian is a forelimb and not a pivot then the fact that it does not trample hold. sent12: the fact that the sequin parches half-sister and is not a blight does not hold if it is a kind of a drug. sent13: if something does not drug then the fact that it does reckon or does not parch bugler or both is incorrect. sent14: the costmary is a spuriousness if it is not a sterilization. sent15: if the sequin is not a kind of a spuriousness it is both a sterilization and a trampler. sent16: the sequin does not parch half-sister and it does not blight. sent17: the sequin is not a kind of a spuriousness. sent18: the Algonquian either does reckon or parches bugler or both. sent19: the fact that the fact that the sequin parches half-sister but it is not a blight hold is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sequin drugs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the sequin does not parch half-sister and is not a blight is not correct is not wrong.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the sequin is not a kind of a drug.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the dalmatian is not a forelimb and is not a kind of a pivot.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the dalmatian is not a trampler.;
that either the Algonquian reckons or it does not parch bugler or both is false.
sent13 -> int6: if the Algonquian does not drug that it either does reckon or does not parch bugler or both is wrong.; sent15 & sent17 -> int7: the sequin is a sterilization and is a kind of a trampler.; int7 -> int8: the sequin is a kind of a trampler.;
$hypothesis$ = either the Algonquian reckons or it does not parch bugler or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dalmatian is both not a forelimb and not a pivot then it is not a trampler. sent2: the Algonquian either does reckon or does not parch bugler or both if that the costmary does not reckon hold. sent3: the dalmatian is not a forelimb and it does not pivot if the sequin is not a drug. sent4: the dalmatian is not a forelimb. sent5: the sequin does not parch half-sister. sent6: if the costmary is not a sterilization then it does not reckon and it is a spuriousness. sent7: the costmary is a kind of a spuriousness. sent8: the fact that the dalmatian is not a kind of a forelimb is true if the sequin is not a kind of a drug. sent9: if that the fact that the costmary does reckon is wrong is not false the Algonquian does reckon and/or it does parch bugler. sent10: the fact that the sequin does not parch half-sister and it is not a blight is incorrect if that it is a drug hold. sent11: if the dalmatian is a forelimb and not a pivot then the fact that it does not trample hold. sent12: the fact that the sequin parches half-sister and is not a blight does not hold if it is a kind of a drug. sent13: if something does not drug then the fact that it does reckon or does not parch bugler or both is incorrect. sent14: the costmary is a spuriousness if it is not a sterilization. sent15: if the sequin is not a kind of a spuriousness it is both a sterilization and a trampler. sent16: the sequin does not parch half-sister and it does not blight. sent17: the sequin is not a kind of a spuriousness. sent18: the Algonquian either does reckon or parches bugler or both. sent19: the fact that the fact that the sequin parches half-sister but it is not a blight hold is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sequin drugs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the sequin does not parch half-sister and is not a blight is not correct is not wrong.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the sequin is not a kind of a drug.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the dalmatian is not a forelimb and is not a kind of a pivot.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the dalmatian is not a trampler.; __UNKNOWN__