that the dalmatian is not biotypic is not wrong.
sent1: if the boarfish is not non-alternating then it does not hash Bel. sent2: the oregano is a dogging that does not confederate Aramus if the boarfish does not confederate Aramus. sent3: the oregano is a dogging. sent4: if that something is not a dogging but it does confederate Aramus is wrong then the fact that it is not a Togaviridae is not incorrect. sent5: if that something does not confederate Aramus and is biotypic is incorrect it is not biotypic. sent6: that the boarfish is not a dogging and confederates Aramus is not right if the oregano does not confederates Aramus. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a broil. sent8: the oregano is alvine if it confederates Aramus. sent9: if the boarfish is a dogging then it is not a Togaviridae. sent10: there is something such that it is a burning and it is not a broil. sent11: if a burning is a broil then the oregano is not alvine. sent12: if the oregano is a Togaviridae then that it is both a dogging and not alvine is not right. sent13: if something is alvine that it does not confederate Aramus and it is biotypic is not true. sent14: the fact that the boarfish is a kind of non-biotypic thing that is a kind of a dogging is not right. sent15: the peer does not confederate Aramus. sent16: the dalmatian is biotypic but not a Togaviridae if the boarfish is not a Togaviridae. sent17: the oregano is not alvine if a burning is not a kind of a broil. sent18: the dalmatian is not a Togaviridae. sent19: the fact that the boarfish is a kind of a dogging that does confederate Aramus is not correct. sent20: the dalmatian is not a dogging. sent21: something is not a kind of a Togaviridae if it is a dogging.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oregano confederates Aramus.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the oregano is alvine.; sent10 & sent17 -> int2: the oregano is not alvine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the oregano does not confederate Aramus.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the boarfish is not a dogging but it does confederate Aramus does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: the fact that the boarfish is not a Togaviridae is not false if the fact that it is not a dogging and it does confederate Aramus is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the boarfish is not a kind of a Togaviridae.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the dalmatian is biotypic but it is not a Togaviridae.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the dalmatian is not biotypic.
sent5 -> int9: if that the dalmatian does not confederate Aramus but it is biotypic is wrong it is not biotypic.; sent13 -> int10: that the dalmatian does not confederate Aramus and is biotypic is not right if it is alvine.;
$hypothesis$ = that the dalmatian is not biotypic is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the boarfish is not non-alternating then it does not hash Bel. sent2: the oregano is a dogging that does not confederate Aramus if the boarfish does not confederate Aramus. sent3: the oregano is a dogging. sent4: if that something is not a dogging but it does confederate Aramus is wrong then the fact that it is not a Togaviridae is not incorrect. sent5: if that something does not confederate Aramus and is biotypic is incorrect it is not biotypic. sent6: that the boarfish is not a dogging and confederates Aramus is not right if the oregano does not confederates Aramus. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a broil. sent8: the oregano is alvine if it confederates Aramus. sent9: if the boarfish is a dogging then it is not a Togaviridae. sent10: there is something such that it is a burning and it is not a broil. sent11: if a burning is a broil then the oregano is not alvine. sent12: if the oregano is a Togaviridae then that it is both a dogging and not alvine is not right. sent13: if something is alvine that it does not confederate Aramus and it is biotypic is not true. sent14: the fact that the boarfish is a kind of non-biotypic thing that is a kind of a dogging is not right. sent15: the peer does not confederate Aramus. sent16: the dalmatian is biotypic but not a Togaviridae if the boarfish is not a Togaviridae. sent17: the oregano is not alvine if a burning is not a kind of a broil. sent18: the dalmatian is not a Togaviridae. sent19: the fact that the boarfish is a kind of a dogging that does confederate Aramus is not correct. sent20: the dalmatian is not a dogging. sent21: something is not a kind of a Togaviridae if it is a dogging. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oregano confederates Aramus.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the oregano is alvine.; sent10 & sent17 -> int2: the oregano is not alvine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the oregano does not confederate Aramus.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the boarfish is not a dogging but it does confederate Aramus does not hold.; sent4 -> int6: the fact that the boarfish is not a Togaviridae is not false if the fact that it is not a dogging and it does confederate Aramus is not true.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the boarfish is not a kind of a Togaviridae.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the dalmatian is biotypic but it is not a Togaviridae.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__