if the naphtha is not a scattering it is not a kind of a undesirability.
sent1: something is a flower-of-an-hour and minstrels Balsamorhiza if it is not auspicious. sent2: if a non-forehanded thing is photochemical it does scatter. sent3: the naphtha is both inauspicious and non-cationic if it is tertian. sent4: if that the naphtha does snail but it does not collogue moralism is incorrect then the raftsman is a kind of a undesirability. sent5: the naphtha is a undesirability if it does not scatter. sent6: if something is a kind of forehanded thing that is not photochemical then it is a scattering. sent7: the naphtha does scatter if it is non-forehanded thing that is photochemical. sent8: the naprapath is not extracellular and it is not explicable if it is a quote. sent9: the stevedore is tertian. sent10: that something is a snail but it does not collogue moralism does not hold if it is a flower-of-an-hour. sent11: the trivet scatters. sent12: the naphtha is not a snail and is not radiopaque. sent13: if the plumb is not nominative then it is not a scattering. sent14: if the naphtha is a kind of a forehanded that is not photochemical then it is a kind of a scattering. sent15: the fact that the naphtha is tertian is not false if the fact that the stevedore is not tertian is not right. sent16: if something that is not forehanded is not photochemical it scatters. sent17: if the naphtha is a kind of a scattering it is not a undesirability.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the naphtha is a undesirability.; sent16 -> int1: the naphtha does scatter if it is not a forehanded and is not photochemical.;
the raftsman does scatter.
sent10 -> int2: that the naphtha snails but it does not collogue moralism does not hold if that it is a flower-of-an-hour is not false.; sent1 -> int3: if the naphtha is not auspicious then it is a flower-of-an-hour and it does minstrel Balsamorhiza.; sent15 & sent9 -> int4: the naphtha is tertian.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the naphtha is both not auspicious and not cationic.; int5 -> int6: the naphtha is not auspicious.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the naphtha is a flower-of-an-hour and it minstrels Balsamorhiza.; int7 -> int8: the naphtha is a flower-of-an-hour.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the fact that the naphtha is a kind of a snail and does not collogue moralism is incorrect is not wrong.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the raftsman is a undesirability.;
$hypothesis$ = if the naphtha is not a scattering it is not a kind of a undesirability. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a flower-of-an-hour and minstrels Balsamorhiza if it is not auspicious. sent2: if a non-forehanded thing is photochemical it does scatter. sent3: the naphtha is both inauspicious and non-cationic if it is tertian. sent4: if that the naphtha does snail but it does not collogue moralism is incorrect then the raftsman is a kind of a undesirability. sent5: the naphtha is a undesirability if it does not scatter. sent6: if something is a kind of forehanded thing that is not photochemical then it is a scattering. sent7: the naphtha does scatter if it is non-forehanded thing that is photochemical. sent8: the naprapath is not extracellular and it is not explicable if it is a quote. sent9: the stevedore is tertian. sent10: that something is a snail but it does not collogue moralism does not hold if it is a flower-of-an-hour. sent11: the trivet scatters. sent12: the naphtha is not a snail and is not radiopaque. sent13: if the plumb is not nominative then it is not a scattering. sent14: if the naphtha is a kind of a forehanded that is not photochemical then it is a kind of a scattering. sent15: the fact that the naphtha is tertian is not false if the fact that the stevedore is not tertian is not right. sent16: if something that is not forehanded is not photochemical it scatters. sent17: if the naphtha is a kind of a scattering it is not a undesirability. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the naphtha is a undesirability.; sent16 -> int1: the naphtha does scatter if it is not a forehanded and is not photochemical.; __UNKNOWN__