the fact that the trichlormethiazide does concern neurobiologist is true.
sent1: that the trichlormethiazide does not concern neurobiologist is not right if the estrone is a tebibit. sent2: the tangle is a tebibit. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Hoth then it does not concern neurobiologist and does not reopen controversy. sent4: if that the tangle is not a imperishability hold then that it is a Komi and it is not calyceal is not right. sent5: that the tangle is not a imperishability is not false. sent6: if the tangle does reopen controversy then the estrone is a tebibit. sent7: something is a kind of a Hoth if that it is both a Komi and not calyceal is not correct. sent8: that something reopens controversy and is a tebibit does not hold if it does not concern neurobiologist. sent9: the tangle does reopen controversy if it is a kind of a Hoth. sent10: the fact that if the benedick is the caret the benedick is a kind of a defaulter is right.
sent7 -> int1: if that the tangle is a Komi but it is not calyceal does not hold then it is a Hoth.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: that the tangle is a Komi and not calyceal is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tangle is a Hoth.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the tangle reopens controversy.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the estrone is a tebibit.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the eater is not a Hoth.
sent8 -> int6: the fact that the eater reopens controversy and it is a kind of a tebibit is not true if it does not concern neurobiologist.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the trichlormethiazide does concern neurobiologist is true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the trichlormethiazide does not concern neurobiologist is not right if the estrone is a tebibit. sent2: the tangle is a tebibit. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Hoth then it does not concern neurobiologist and does not reopen controversy. sent4: if that the tangle is not a imperishability hold then that it is a Komi and it is not calyceal is not right. sent5: that the tangle is not a imperishability is not false. sent6: if the tangle does reopen controversy then the estrone is a tebibit. sent7: something is a kind of a Hoth if that it is both a Komi and not calyceal is not correct. sent8: that something reopens controversy and is a tebibit does not hold if it does not concern neurobiologist. sent9: the tangle does reopen controversy if it is a kind of a Hoth. sent10: the fact that if the benedick is the caret the benedick is a kind of a defaulter is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if that the tangle is a Komi but it is not calyceal does not hold then it is a Hoth.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: that the tangle is a Komi and not calyceal is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tangle is a Hoth.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the tangle reopens controversy.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the estrone is a tebibit.; int5 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__