the infernal does not dominate mushiness.
sent1: if the fact that the cabbageworm is not an anterior and is a Slovak is wrong then it does not dominate mushiness. sent2: there are non-ichorous things. sent3: if the fact that something is not same and it does not beat villeinage does not hold then it does not beat propenal. sent4: if the turkey is not antennal and it does not beat brad that it is not anterior hold. sent5: the infernal does not dominate mushiness if the town beats scenario. sent6: if the west is not a Seyhan and it is not Wilsonian that it is not a Brahman is correct. sent7: if something is not a kind of an anterior it does not key and it is a Slovak. sent8: if that the town is not indecorous and it is not a kind of a key does not hold then it does not beat scenario. sent9: the turkey does not volatilize if there is something such that the fact that it does not beat brad is correct. sent10: something does not key if it is not anterior. sent11: that the turkey does not volatilize is not incorrect if it is not antennal. sent12: the infernal does not dominate mushiness if the town beats scenario and/or it does not volatilize. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not ichorous then the fact that the turkey is not a key but it is a Slovak is not correct. sent14: something is not indecorous if that it is not antennal and does not beat brad is wrong. sent15: the turkey does not dominate mushiness. sent16: something is a laticifer. sent17: if the turkey is not a Slovak but it is indecorous that it does not beat scenario is true. sent18: that the turkey is not antennal and does dominate mushiness does not hold. sent19: if the west does not beat scenario either the town beat scenario or it does not volatilize or both. sent20: there exists something such that it does dominate mushiness. sent21: the turkey does not beat brad. sent22: the fastnacht does not beat hesitance and it is not a representative. sent23: the enzyme does not beat brad but it is a kind of a manslaughter.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the turkey is not antennal and it does not beat brad.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the turkey is not a kind of an anterior.; sent7 -> int2: the turkey is not a key but it is a kind of a Slovak if it is not anterior.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the turkey does not key but it is a kind of a Slovak.; sent2 & sent13 -> int4: that the turkey is not a kind of a key but it is a kind of a Slovak is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the turkey is not antennal and does not beat brad does not hold.; sent14 -> int7: if that the turkey is not antennal and does not beat brad is incorrect then it is not indecorous.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the turkey is not indecorous is not wrong.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not indecorous.;
the cabbageworm does not dominate mushiness.
$hypothesis$ = the infernal does not dominate mushiness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the cabbageworm is not an anterior and is a Slovak is wrong then it does not dominate mushiness. sent2: there are non-ichorous things. sent3: if the fact that something is not same and it does not beat villeinage does not hold then it does not beat propenal. sent4: if the turkey is not antennal and it does not beat brad that it is not anterior hold. sent5: the infernal does not dominate mushiness if the town beats scenario. sent6: if the west is not a Seyhan and it is not Wilsonian that it is not a Brahman is correct. sent7: if something is not a kind of an anterior it does not key and it is a Slovak. sent8: if that the town is not indecorous and it is not a kind of a key does not hold then it does not beat scenario. sent9: the turkey does not volatilize if there is something such that the fact that it does not beat brad is correct. sent10: something does not key if it is not anterior. sent11: that the turkey does not volatilize is not incorrect if it is not antennal. sent12: the infernal does not dominate mushiness if the town beats scenario and/or it does not volatilize. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not ichorous then the fact that the turkey is not a key but it is a Slovak is not correct. sent14: something is not indecorous if that it is not antennal and does not beat brad is wrong. sent15: the turkey does not dominate mushiness. sent16: something is a laticifer. sent17: if the turkey is not a Slovak but it is indecorous that it does not beat scenario is true. sent18: that the turkey is not antennal and does dominate mushiness does not hold. sent19: if the west does not beat scenario either the town beat scenario or it does not volatilize or both. sent20: there exists something such that it does dominate mushiness. sent21: the turkey does not beat brad. sent22: the fastnacht does not beat hesitance and it is not a representative. sent23: the enzyme does not beat brad but it is a kind of a manslaughter. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the turkey is not antennal and it does not beat brad.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the turkey is not a kind of an anterior.; sent7 -> int2: the turkey is not a key but it is a kind of a Slovak if it is not anterior.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the turkey does not key but it is a kind of a Slovak.; sent2 & sent13 -> int4: that the turkey is not a kind of a key but it is a kind of a Slovak is not true.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the turkey is not antennal and does not beat brad does not hold.; sent14 -> int7: if that the turkey is not antennal and does not beat brad is incorrect then it is not indecorous.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that the turkey is not indecorous is not wrong.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not indecorous.; __UNKNOWN__