the fact that the goldfish is not axiological hold.
sent1: something is orthodontics. sent2: if that the abrader is not a kind of an amputee and/or it is not a stereotype is not correct the paramagnet is not intraventricular. sent3: that something does not rerun ghee and does not unstrap Boyle is incorrect if it is non-intraventricular. sent4: that something is not axiological and it is not a Stephenson is incorrect if it is orthodontics. sent5: if that something is both non-redemptive and not non-ratty is incorrect that it does not rerun ghee hold. sent6: if the paramagnet is not axiological then the fact that it does not rerun ghee and it is not intraventricular is wrong. sent7: if the fact that there is something such that it does not rerun ghee is not incorrect then the paramagnet does not unstrap Boyle. sent8: if the larch is bathyal then it is a kind of non-Draconian thing that is not a labeled. sent9: if there exists something such that it is orthodontics the fact that the abrader is not an amputee or it is not a stereotype or both is not true. sent10: that the goldfish is not axiological is right if that the paramagnet does not rerun ghee and it does not unstrap Boyle is not correct. sent11: that something is a stereotype that is not intraventricular is false if it does not unstrap Boyle. sent12: if the abrader is not an amputee then the goldfish is not non-axiological and is orthodontics. sent13: the larch is bathyal. sent14: that something is not redemptive and is ratty is incorrect if it is not a labeled.
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the abrader is not an amputee or it is not a stereotype or both is wrong.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the paramagnet is not intraventricular.; sent3 -> int3: the fact that the paramagnet does not rerun ghee and it does not unstrap Boyle does not hold if it is not intraventricular.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the paramagnet does not rerun ghee and it does not unstrap Boyle is wrong.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the goldfish is axiological.
sent11 -> int5: that the fact that the paramagnet is a kind of a stereotype but it is not intraventricular is not true is not wrong if it does not unstrap Boyle.; sent5 -> int6: if that the larch is not redemptive and is ratty is not correct it does not rerun ghee.; sent14 -> int7: if the larch is not a labeled then the fact that it is not redemptive and it is ratty is wrong.; sent8 & sent13 -> int8: the larch is not Draconian and it is not a labeled.; int8 -> int9: the larch is not a kind of a labeled.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the larch is not redemptive and is not non-ratty is incorrect.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the larch does not rerun ghee.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it does not rerun ghee is not false.; int12 & sent7 -> int13: the fact that the paramagnet does not unstrap Boyle is not incorrect.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the paramagnet is a stereotype but it is not intraventricular is false.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it is a stereotype and it is not intraventricular does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the goldfish is not axiological hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is orthodontics. sent2: if that the abrader is not a kind of an amputee and/or it is not a stereotype is not correct the paramagnet is not intraventricular. sent3: that something does not rerun ghee and does not unstrap Boyle is incorrect if it is non-intraventricular. sent4: that something is not axiological and it is not a Stephenson is incorrect if it is orthodontics. sent5: if that something is both non-redemptive and not non-ratty is incorrect that it does not rerun ghee hold. sent6: if the paramagnet is not axiological then the fact that it does not rerun ghee and it is not intraventricular is wrong. sent7: if the fact that there is something such that it does not rerun ghee is not incorrect then the paramagnet does not unstrap Boyle. sent8: if the larch is bathyal then it is a kind of non-Draconian thing that is not a labeled. sent9: if there exists something such that it is orthodontics the fact that the abrader is not an amputee or it is not a stereotype or both is not true. sent10: that the goldfish is not axiological is right if that the paramagnet does not rerun ghee and it does not unstrap Boyle is not correct. sent11: that something is a stereotype that is not intraventricular is false if it does not unstrap Boyle. sent12: if the abrader is not an amputee then the goldfish is not non-axiological and is orthodontics. sent13: the larch is bathyal. sent14: that something is not redemptive and is ratty is incorrect if it is not a labeled. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the abrader is not an amputee or it is not a stereotype or both is wrong.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the paramagnet is not intraventricular.; sent3 -> int3: the fact that the paramagnet does not rerun ghee and it does not unstrap Boyle does not hold if it is not intraventricular.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the paramagnet does not rerun ghee and it does not unstrap Boyle is wrong.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__