the fact that the Kaiser is not palpatory and it does not palatalize Whitmonday is not true if the speed is a Dyirbal.
sent1: if something is not unborn then it is a kind of a Dyirbal and it does backstop pulsation. sent2: the speed does backstop pulsation if the fact that it is a Dyirbal hold. sent3: the buckwheat does palatalize main and it palatalizes Whitmonday if the rhinoscope is not a kind of a Kachin. sent4: the fact that the Kaiser is not palpatory and palatalizes Whitmonday is wrong. sent5: the fact that the fact that the Kaiser is a kind of non-palpatory thing that does not palatalize Whitmonday does not hold hold if the rhinoscope is not palpatory. sent6: if the fact that the speed is a Dyirbal is not false then that the Kaiser is non-palpatory thing that palatalizes Whitmonday is not true. sent7: that the buckwheat is unborn and backstops Sabin is not correct if the speed backstops pulsation. sent8: that if the fact that the buckwheat is not unborn and does backstop Sabin does not hold then the rhinoscope is not palpatory hold. sent9: if there is something such that it is a Dyirbal then the speed does backstop Sabin or it is a Dyirbal or both. sent10: the fact that the Kaiser does not backstop Sabin and is not unborn is not true if the buckwheat does not backstop Sabin. sent11: if the rhinoscope is not palpatory then the Kaiser is a kind of non-palpatory thing that does not palatalize Whitmonday. sent12: the Kaiser is not palpatory and does not palatalize Whitmonday if the speed is a Dyirbal. sent13: if something palatalizes main then it is palpatory and is not unborn. sent14: the rhinoscope is not a kind of a Kachin. sent15: that the MSG backstops Sabin if the speed backstops Sabin is not incorrect. sent16: if the speed backstops pulsation that the buckwheat is not unborn but it does backstop Sabin is false. sent17: the speed does not palatalize Whitmonday.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the speed is a Dyirbal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the speed backstops pulsation.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: that the buckwheat is not unborn but it does backstop Sabin is false.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the rhinoscope is not palpatory.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Kaiser is not palpatory and does not palatalize Whitmonday is wrong.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the MSG does backstop Sabin.
sent1 -> int5: the buckwheat is a kind of a Dyirbal and backstops pulsation if it is not unborn.; sent13 -> int6: if the buckwheat does palatalize main it is palpatory thing that is not unborn.; sent3 & sent14 -> int7: the buckwheat palatalizes main and it palatalizes Whitmonday.; int7 -> int8: the buckwheat does palatalize main.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the buckwheat is palpatory and is not unborn.; int9 -> int10: the buckwheat is not unborn.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the buckwheat is a Dyirbal and it backstops pulsation.; int11 -> int12: the fact that the buckwheat is a Dyirbal is not false.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is a kind of a Dyirbal.; int13 & sent9 -> int14: either the speed backstops Sabin or it is a kind of a Dyirbal or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Kaiser is not palpatory and it does not palatalize Whitmonday is not true if the speed is a Dyirbal. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not unborn then it is a kind of a Dyirbal and it does backstop pulsation. sent2: the speed does backstop pulsation if the fact that it is a Dyirbal hold. sent3: the buckwheat does palatalize main and it palatalizes Whitmonday if the rhinoscope is not a kind of a Kachin. sent4: the fact that the Kaiser is not palpatory and palatalizes Whitmonday is wrong. sent5: the fact that the fact that the Kaiser is a kind of non-palpatory thing that does not palatalize Whitmonday does not hold hold if the rhinoscope is not palpatory. sent6: if the fact that the speed is a Dyirbal is not false then that the Kaiser is non-palpatory thing that palatalizes Whitmonday is not true. sent7: that the buckwheat is unborn and backstops Sabin is not correct if the speed backstops pulsation. sent8: that if the fact that the buckwheat is not unborn and does backstop Sabin does not hold then the rhinoscope is not palpatory hold. sent9: if there is something such that it is a Dyirbal then the speed does backstop Sabin or it is a Dyirbal or both. sent10: the fact that the Kaiser does not backstop Sabin and is not unborn is not true if the buckwheat does not backstop Sabin. sent11: if the rhinoscope is not palpatory then the Kaiser is a kind of non-palpatory thing that does not palatalize Whitmonday. sent12: the Kaiser is not palpatory and does not palatalize Whitmonday if the speed is a Dyirbal. sent13: if something palatalizes main then it is palpatory and is not unborn. sent14: the rhinoscope is not a kind of a Kachin. sent15: that the MSG backstops Sabin if the speed backstops Sabin is not incorrect. sent16: if the speed backstops pulsation that the buckwheat is not unborn but it does backstop Sabin is false. sent17: the speed does not palatalize Whitmonday. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the speed is a Dyirbal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the speed backstops pulsation.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: that the buckwheat is not unborn but it does backstop Sabin is false.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the rhinoscope is not palpatory.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the Kaiser is not palpatory and does not palatalize Whitmonday is wrong.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__