the fact that the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur if the estuarineness happens is not right.
sent1: if the fact that the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur does not hold that the estuarineness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the repeatableness does not occur if that that the appealableness does not occur but the estuarineness happens is incorrect is right. sent3: that the grading planetesimal does not occur is not wrong if that the choking happens is not incorrect. sent4: that not the appealableness but the estuarineness occurs is incorrect if the gastronomicness does not occur. sent5: that the immaterialness does not occur is true if that the music does not occur and the kabbalism does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the climaticness does not occur if that the scheme does not occur and the rejoining does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: if the incuriousness occurs then the stoking newsletter does not occur. sent8: the generousness occurs if the fact that the repeatableness does not occur hold. sent9: the gastronomicness does not occur if that both the maintenance and the perjury occurs is not right. sent10: the estuarineness occurs if the fact that the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur is not correct. sent11: the Chileanness does not occur if that the counting Tertullian but not the grading understatement occurs is not right. sent12: that the non-distalness and the looseness occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur is false.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the estuarineness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the estuarineness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the generousness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur if the estuarineness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur does not hold that the estuarineness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the repeatableness does not occur if that that the appealableness does not occur but the estuarineness happens is incorrect is right. sent3: that the grading planetesimal does not occur is not wrong if that the choking happens is not incorrect. sent4: that not the appealableness but the estuarineness occurs is incorrect if the gastronomicness does not occur. sent5: that the immaterialness does not occur is true if that the music does not occur and the kabbalism does not occur is incorrect. sent6: the climaticness does not occur if that the scheme does not occur and the rejoining does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: if the incuriousness occurs then the stoking newsletter does not occur. sent8: the generousness occurs if the fact that the repeatableness does not occur hold. sent9: the gastronomicness does not occur if that both the maintenance and the perjury occurs is not right. sent10: the estuarineness occurs if the fact that the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur is not correct. sent11: the Chileanness does not occur if that the counting Tertullian but not the grading understatement occurs is not right. sent12: that the non-distalness and the looseness occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur is false.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the estuarineness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the estuarineness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the distalness does not occur and the looseness does not occur.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__