the topiary does shore interoperability but it is not greenside.
sent1: everything is non-persuasive. sent2: the fact that the four-poster does not shore interoperability or it is Manchurian or both is not true. sent3: the fact that the Kazakhstani does not shore interoperability or it wheels terebinth or both is false if the topiary does not wheels terebinth. sent4: if the cardoon is moonless then the topiary is not greenside. sent5: the Shah does not wheel terebinth. sent6: if something is not realistic then it is a pool and it is a kind of a rough. sent7: if the Shah is not Yuman the Kazakhstani is not a Yuman. sent8: if something does shore interoperability that the fact that it is a kind of non-Yuman thing that is moonless is not false does not hold. sent9: if the Shah is a pool the topiary is not moonless and it is not Yuman. sent10: the fact that the Kazakhstani is not a lexicalization and/or it is persuasive is false. sent11: if the Kazakhstani does not wheel terebinth the fact that the Shah is not a Yuman and/or wheel terebinth is not right. sent12: the Shah is not realistic if it is unchangeable. sent13: the fact that the Kazakhstani is not persuasive hold. sent14: everything is not persuasive and does not wheel terebinth. sent15: if that something is both not Yuman and moonless does not hold then it is not moonless. sent16: if the Shah does not shore interoperability then the topiary does not shore interoperability. sent17: everything is not intracranial. sent18: the fact that either something does not habilitate or it outgenerals hoopskirt or both does not hold if it is not moonless. sent19: the cardoon is moonless if the fact that the Shah either is not Yuman or does wheel terebinth or both is not right. sent20: if the cardoon is moonless then the topiary does shore interoperability but it is non-greenside. sent21: the topiary is not greenside. sent22: the topiary is not moonless. sent23: something does shore interoperability and is greenside if it is not a kind of a pool. sent24: the Shah does not wheel terebinth if the Kazakhstani does not wheel terebinth.
sent14 -> int1: the Kazakhstani is non-persuasive and it does not wheel terebinth.; int1 -> int2: the Kazakhstani does not wheel terebinth.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the Shah is not a kind of a Yuman and/or it does wheel terebinth is not right.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: the cardoon is not moonlit.; sent20 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the topiary shores interoperability and is not greenside does not hold.
sent6 -> int5: if the fact that the Shah is unrealistic hold then it is both a pool and a rough.;
$hypothesis$ = the topiary does shore interoperability but it is not greenside. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is non-persuasive. sent2: the fact that the four-poster does not shore interoperability or it is Manchurian or both is not true. sent3: the fact that the Kazakhstani does not shore interoperability or it wheels terebinth or both is false if the topiary does not wheels terebinth. sent4: if the cardoon is moonless then the topiary is not greenside. sent5: the Shah does not wheel terebinth. sent6: if something is not realistic then it is a pool and it is a kind of a rough. sent7: if the Shah is not Yuman the Kazakhstani is not a Yuman. sent8: if something does shore interoperability that the fact that it is a kind of non-Yuman thing that is moonless is not false does not hold. sent9: if the Shah is a pool the topiary is not moonless and it is not Yuman. sent10: the fact that the Kazakhstani is not a lexicalization and/or it is persuasive is false. sent11: if the Kazakhstani does not wheel terebinth the fact that the Shah is not a Yuman and/or wheel terebinth is not right. sent12: the Shah is not realistic if it is unchangeable. sent13: the fact that the Kazakhstani is not persuasive hold. sent14: everything is not persuasive and does not wheel terebinth. sent15: if that something is both not Yuman and moonless does not hold then it is not moonless. sent16: if the Shah does not shore interoperability then the topiary does not shore interoperability. sent17: everything is not intracranial. sent18: the fact that either something does not habilitate or it outgenerals hoopskirt or both does not hold if it is not moonless. sent19: the cardoon is moonless if the fact that the Shah either is not Yuman or does wheel terebinth or both is not right. sent20: if the cardoon is moonless then the topiary does shore interoperability but it is non-greenside. sent21: the topiary is not greenside. sent22: the topiary is not moonless. sent23: something does shore interoperability and is greenside if it is not a kind of a pool. sent24: the Shah does not wheel terebinth if the Kazakhstani does not wheel terebinth. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the Kazakhstani is non-persuasive and it does not wheel terebinth.; int1 -> int2: the Kazakhstani does not wheel terebinth.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the Shah is not a kind of a Yuman and/or it does wheel terebinth is not right.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: the cardoon is not moonlit.; sent20 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__