the rafter repots Eolithic.
sent1: the rafter does repot Eolithic if the fact that the dextrose mounds is true. sent2: something that squishes Packera does not repot Eolithic. sent3: the rafter is not multilateral. sent4: if something squishes Packera and/or does not repot Eolithic then it is not a Commerce. sent5: the fact that the dextrose is a mound if there exists something such that the fact that it does repot Lindera and it does not repot deceptiveness is false is right. sent6: the retort does squish Packera. sent7: the rafter does squish Packera if the coiffeuse repots Eolithic. sent8: if the fact that the rafter is not multilateral is not wrong the fact that it does blog and it webs is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that it does repot Lindera and it does not repot deceptiveness. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a mound and does not squish Packera is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it repots Lindera and it does repot deceptiveness is false. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not repot Lindera the dextrose is a mound. sent13: the dextrose does squish Packera if there is something such that the fact that it does vacate and it is not a kind of a mound is incorrect. sent14: if the dextrose does not vacate then it does squish Packera and/or it does not repot Eolithic. sent15: the fact that the coiffeuse is a kind of an appeasement that does not squish Packera does not hold. sent16: if the rafter does repot deceptiveness the coiffeuse repots Eolithic. sent17: the dextrose is a number but it is not a kind of a Oahu. sent18: the fact that the rafter is a novelist and does not squish Packera does not hold. sent19: that something repots Lindera and does not repot deceptiveness is false if it does not squish Packera. sent20: the rafter is a mound if there exists something such that the fact that it repots Eolithic and it does not repot deceptiveness is incorrect. sent21: the huckster does not vacate. sent22: the coiffeuse does vacate.
sent19 -> int1: if the coiffeuse does not squish Packera then that it repots Lindera and does not repot deceptiveness is not right.;
the biologist is not a kind of a Commerce.
sent4 -> int2: the dextrose is not a Commerce if it squishes Packera or it does not repot Eolithic or both.; sent8 & sent3 -> int3: the fact that the rafter is a blog and it is a kind of a webbing is not right.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is a kind of a blog and it is a webbing is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the rafter repots Eolithic. ; $context$ = sent1: the rafter does repot Eolithic if the fact that the dextrose mounds is true. sent2: something that squishes Packera does not repot Eolithic. sent3: the rafter is not multilateral. sent4: if something squishes Packera and/or does not repot Eolithic then it is not a Commerce. sent5: the fact that the dextrose is a mound if there exists something such that the fact that it does repot Lindera and it does not repot deceptiveness is false is right. sent6: the retort does squish Packera. sent7: the rafter does squish Packera if the coiffeuse repots Eolithic. sent8: if the fact that the rafter is not multilateral is not wrong the fact that it does blog and it webs is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that it does repot Lindera and it does not repot deceptiveness. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a mound and does not squish Packera is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it repots Lindera and it does repot deceptiveness is false. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not repot Lindera the dextrose is a mound. sent13: the dextrose does squish Packera if there is something such that the fact that it does vacate and it is not a kind of a mound is incorrect. sent14: if the dextrose does not vacate then it does squish Packera and/or it does not repot Eolithic. sent15: the fact that the coiffeuse is a kind of an appeasement that does not squish Packera does not hold. sent16: if the rafter does repot deceptiveness the coiffeuse repots Eolithic. sent17: the dextrose is a number but it is not a kind of a Oahu. sent18: the fact that the rafter is a novelist and does not squish Packera does not hold. sent19: that something repots Lindera and does not repot deceptiveness is false if it does not squish Packera. sent20: the rafter is a mound if there exists something such that the fact that it repots Eolithic and it does not repot deceptiveness is incorrect. sent21: the huckster does not vacate. sent22: the coiffeuse does vacate. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: if the coiffeuse does not squish Packera then that it repots Lindera and does not repot deceptiveness is not right.; __UNKNOWN__