if the gale is not a speakeasy the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible.
sent1: the gale is a roundelay if the heartthrob is nonsubmersible. sent2: if the heartthrob is nonsubmersible then the gale is a speakeasy. sent3: the gale is a speakeasy if the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible. sent4: if that either something repines gale or it is not a taps or both is not right then it does not repine zoril. sent5: the fact that the fact that the heartthrob is not a roundelay but nonsubmersible is right is not true. sent6: if the gale is not a speakeasy then the heartthrob is a roundelay and is not nonsubmersible. sent7: the heartthrob is a roundelay. sent8: the heartthrob is a roundelay that is not nonsubmersible. sent9: there exists something such that it does confuse ceruse. sent10: the zoril is not a kind of a speakeasy. sent11: the heartthrob is not nonsubmersible. sent12: if the gale is not a speakeasy then the heartthrob is submersible. sent13: if that the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible does not hold then the gale is a speakeasy. sent14: that the gale does repine gale or it does not tap or both does not hold if there is something such that it confuses ceruse. sent15: the gale is a speakeasy if that the heartthrob is a roundelay that is not nonsubmersible is not correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible is not correct.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the gale is a speakeasy is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gale is not a speakeasy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the gale does not repine zoril and it is non-processional.
sent4 -> int4: the gale does not repine zoril if that it does repine gale and/or it is not a taps does not hold.; sent9 & sent14 -> int5: that the gale either repines gale or is not a taps or both is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gale does not repine zoril.;
$hypothesis$ = if the gale is not a speakeasy the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible. ; $context$ = sent1: the gale is a roundelay if the heartthrob is nonsubmersible. sent2: if the heartthrob is nonsubmersible then the gale is a speakeasy. sent3: the gale is a speakeasy if the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible. sent4: if that either something repines gale or it is not a taps or both is not right then it does not repine zoril. sent5: the fact that the fact that the heartthrob is not a roundelay but nonsubmersible is right is not true. sent6: if the gale is not a speakeasy then the heartthrob is a roundelay and is not nonsubmersible. sent7: the heartthrob is a roundelay. sent8: the heartthrob is a roundelay that is not nonsubmersible. sent9: there exists something such that it does confuse ceruse. sent10: the zoril is not a kind of a speakeasy. sent11: the heartthrob is not nonsubmersible. sent12: if the gale is not a speakeasy then the heartthrob is submersible. sent13: if that the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible does not hold then the gale is a speakeasy. sent14: that the gale does repine gale or it does not tap or both does not hold if there is something such that it confuses ceruse. sent15: the gale is a speakeasy if that the heartthrob is a roundelay that is not nonsubmersible is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible is not correct.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the gale is a speakeasy is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gale is not a speakeasy.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the heartthrob is not a roundelay and it is not nonsubmersible.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__