there exists something such that if it is not presidential the fact that it either does mop or is utopian or both is false.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a stork the fact that it is a pomelo or it is Gandhian or both is incorrect. sent2: that the wrist does better rioting or it outs or both is false if that it does not better rancher is not wrong. sent3: the wrist does not mop if it is not presidential. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not presidential that it mops and/or it is utopian is not wrong. sent5: that the homer is presidential and/or it moistens is incorrect if it does not mount. sent6: that there exists something such that if it is not unpresidential then that it either mops or is utopian or both does not hold hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is not behavioristic then the fact that it is a Cleome and/or it is a kind of a helvella is false. sent8: if the wrist is not presidential then it does mop and/or is utopian. sent9: if the wrist does not weed Romanesque that it is either presidential or indeterminable or both is not correct. sent10: if something does not moisten the fact that it is a kind of a stork and/or is pyogenic is not right. sent11: if something is presidential then the fact that it mops and/or it is not non-utopian does not hold. sent12: a non-presidential thing does not mop. sent13: if something is not presidential it does mop and/or it is utopian. sent14: that something is a lumper and/or it dins is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Hydrophyllum. sent15: that something is fibrocalcific and/or it ablates is not correct if it is not a kind of a Hydrophyllum. sent16: if something is not presidential then that it mops and/or it is utopian is not right. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not presidential it does not mop. sent18: if that the wrist is not low-rise is true that it is a dieter or mops or both is wrong. sent19: if something is not a kind of a Freemason that either it is out or it is a gastronomy or both is false. sent20: if the wrist is presidential that it does mop and/or it is utopian is not true.
sent16 -> int1: if the wrist is not presidential then that it does mop and/or is utopian is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a Hydrophyllum then that it is a lumper and/or does din is false.
sent14 -> int2: that the renter either is a lumper or dins or both is incorrect if the fact that it is not a Hydrophyllum hold.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not presidential the fact that it either does mop or is utopian or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a stork the fact that it is a pomelo or it is Gandhian or both is incorrect. sent2: that the wrist does better rioting or it outs or both is false if that it does not better rancher is not wrong. sent3: the wrist does not mop if it is not presidential. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not presidential that it mops and/or it is utopian is not wrong. sent5: that the homer is presidential and/or it moistens is incorrect if it does not mount. sent6: that there exists something such that if it is not unpresidential then that it either mops or is utopian or both does not hold hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is not behavioristic then the fact that it is a Cleome and/or it is a kind of a helvella is false. sent8: if the wrist is not presidential then it does mop and/or is utopian. sent9: if the wrist does not weed Romanesque that it is either presidential or indeterminable or both is not correct. sent10: if something does not moisten the fact that it is a kind of a stork and/or is pyogenic is not right. sent11: if something is presidential then the fact that it mops and/or it is not non-utopian does not hold. sent12: a non-presidential thing does not mop. sent13: if something is not presidential it does mop and/or it is utopian. sent14: that something is a lumper and/or it dins is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Hydrophyllum. sent15: that something is fibrocalcific and/or it ablates is not correct if it is not a kind of a Hydrophyllum. sent16: if something is not presidential then that it mops and/or it is utopian is not right. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not presidential it does not mop. sent18: if that the wrist is not low-rise is true that it is a dieter or mops or both is wrong. sent19: if something is not a kind of a Freemason that either it is out or it is a gastronomy or both is false. sent20: if the wrist is presidential that it does mop and/or it is utopian is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the wrist is not presidential then that it does mop and/or is utopian is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__