there exists something such that if it is a squeegee then the fact that it does not sputter technophile or it does not question or both does not hold.
sent1: if the peeler squeegees then the fact that it questions is correct. sent2: either the Alexandrian is not culinary or it is not a somatotype or both if it is a puddle. sent3: there is something such that if it does clank Cushitic then it is a campsite. sent4: there exists something such that if it resiles that it is not a sneer and/or it is not nonsuppurative does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is gubernatorial then it is a nucleosynthesis. sent6: there exists something such that if it squeegees that either it does sputter technophile or it is not a question or both does not hold. sent7: if the peeler is a harmonizer then the fact that it is a question and/or it is not a sneer is false. sent8: if the peeler does squeegee that it either does not sputter technophile or is not a kind of a question or both is not right. sent9: the peeler is not hydrodynamic or it is not a squeegee or both if it is orbital. sent10: there is something such that if it does sputter Alexandrian then that it is logical is not incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it does squeegee the fact that it does not sputter technophile or it is a question or both is not true. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a cenotaph then it sputters sarcodinian.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a squeegee then the fact that it does not sputter technophile or it does not question or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the peeler squeegees then the fact that it questions is correct. sent2: either the Alexandrian is not culinary or it is not a somatotype or both if it is a puddle. sent3: there is something such that if it does clank Cushitic then it is a campsite. sent4: there exists something such that if it resiles that it is not a sneer and/or it is not nonsuppurative does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is gubernatorial then it is a nucleosynthesis. sent6: there exists something such that if it squeegees that either it does sputter technophile or it is not a question or both does not hold. sent7: if the peeler is a harmonizer then the fact that it is a question and/or it is not a sneer is false. sent8: if the peeler does squeegee that it either does not sputter technophile or is not a kind of a question or both is not right. sent9: the peeler is not hydrodynamic or it is not a squeegee or both if it is orbital. sent10: there is something such that if it does sputter Alexandrian then that it is logical is not incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it does squeegee the fact that it does not sputter technophile or it is a question or both is not true. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a cenotaph then it sputters sarcodinian. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__