the spatchcock does perceive vault.
sent1: the bankrupt does dip. sent2: the spatchcock is not unreactive if the partridgeberry swamps nephrotomy and is an aquamarine. sent3: something swamps nephrotomy if it does not exalt Lennon. sent4: the partridgeberry is a kind of an aquamarine. sent5: if something either is not exteroceptive or exalts Lennon or both then that the bankrupt does not dip is right. sent6: something perceives vault if it does exalt protection. sent7: the spatchcock is nonspherical if it is reactive.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the partridgeberry exalts Lennon.; assump1 -> int1: the partridgeberry is not exteroceptive or it does exalt Lennon or both.; int1 -> int2: something is not exteroceptive and/or does exalt Lennon.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the bankrupt is not a dip.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the partridgeberry does not exalt Lennon hold.; sent3 -> int6: if the partridgeberry does not exalt Lennon it does swamp nephrotomy.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the partridgeberry does swamp nephrotomy.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the partridgeberry does swamp nephrotomy and it is a kind of an aquamarine.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the spatchcock is not unreactive.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: that the spatchcock is nonspherical is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int11: if the spatchcock exalts protection then it does perceive vault.;
$hypothesis$ = the spatchcock does perceive vault. ; $context$ = sent1: the bankrupt does dip. sent2: the spatchcock is not unreactive if the partridgeberry swamps nephrotomy and is an aquamarine. sent3: something swamps nephrotomy if it does not exalt Lennon. sent4: the partridgeberry is a kind of an aquamarine. sent5: if something either is not exteroceptive or exalts Lennon or both then that the bankrupt does not dip is right. sent6: something perceives vault if it does exalt protection. sent7: the spatchcock is nonspherical if it is reactive. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the partridgeberry exalts Lennon.; assump1 -> int1: the partridgeberry is not exteroceptive or it does exalt Lennon or both.; int1 -> int2: something is not exteroceptive and/or does exalt Lennon.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the bankrupt is not a dip.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the partridgeberry does not exalt Lennon hold.; sent3 -> int6: if the partridgeberry does not exalt Lennon it does swamp nephrotomy.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the partridgeberry does swamp nephrotomy.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the partridgeberry does swamp nephrotomy and it is a kind of an aquamarine.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the spatchcock is not unreactive.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: that the spatchcock is nonspherical is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int11: if the spatchcock exalts protection then it does perceive vault.; __UNKNOWN__