the fact that the icefall is a philodendron or ergotropic or both is not correct.
sent1: the granadillo does not convoy quodlibet if that it is a puppet and does convoy quodlibet is incorrect. sent2: the wardress does sputter names if there is something such that that it is a man-of-the-earth and it does not sputter names is not true. sent3: that the icefall is a puppet is correct if something that convoys quodlibet is Catalan. sent4: if something does convoy quodlibet then it is a philodendron. sent5: there exists nothing that is stagflationary and is not a kind of a man-of-the-earth. sent6: if the fact that the wardress is stagflationary thing that is not a man-of-the-earth is not true then the granadillo does convoy quodlibet. sent7: the granadillo is a Catalan if there is something such that that it is both a Sium and Catalan is incorrect. sent8: something sputters names if it is a kind of a puppet. sent9: if the icefall sputters names then it is ergotropic. sent10: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Sium and it is not Catalan does not hold.
sent5 -> int1: that that the wardress is not non-stagflationary but it is not a man-of-the-earth is not correct is not incorrect.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the granadillo does convoy quodlibet.; sent10 & sent7 -> int3: the granadillo is Catalan.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the granadillo convoys quodlibet and it is not non-Catalan.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it convoys quodlibet and is Catalan.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the icefall is a kind of a puppet.; sent8 -> int7: if the icefall is a kind of a puppet it sputters names.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the icefall sputters names.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the icefall is ergotropic.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the wardress is a philodendron.
sent4 -> int10: if the wardress convoys quodlibet it is a philodendron.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the icefall is a philodendron or ergotropic or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the granadillo does not convoy quodlibet if that it is a puppet and does convoy quodlibet is incorrect. sent2: the wardress does sputter names if there is something such that that it is a man-of-the-earth and it does not sputter names is not true. sent3: that the icefall is a puppet is correct if something that convoys quodlibet is Catalan. sent4: if something does convoy quodlibet then it is a philodendron. sent5: there exists nothing that is stagflationary and is not a kind of a man-of-the-earth. sent6: if the fact that the wardress is stagflationary thing that is not a man-of-the-earth is not true then the granadillo does convoy quodlibet. sent7: the granadillo is a Catalan if there is something such that that it is both a Sium and Catalan is incorrect. sent8: something sputters names if it is a kind of a puppet. sent9: if the icefall sputters names then it is ergotropic. sent10: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Sium and it is not Catalan does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that that the wardress is not non-stagflationary but it is not a man-of-the-earth is not correct is not incorrect.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the granadillo does convoy quodlibet.; sent10 & sent7 -> int3: the granadillo is Catalan.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the granadillo convoys quodlibet and it is not non-Catalan.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it convoys quodlibet and is Catalan.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the icefall is a kind of a puppet.; sent8 -> int7: if the icefall is a kind of a puppet it sputters names.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the icefall sputters names.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the icefall is ergotropic.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__