that there exists something such that if it fears prick then the fact that that it is a lankiness and it is not a pizzicato is not wrong is incorrect is false.
sent1: that the catamountain is a immunopathology and it is subarctic is wrong if it repairs capitol. sent2: if the catamountain is Boeotian then that it does fear amicability and is a kind of a lankiness is not true. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if it does fear prick the fact that that it is a lankiness and it is a kind of a pizzicato is correct does not hold is not false. sent4: there is something such that if it is a catamountain that it is a splice and it does scruple is not true. sent5: the fact that the capitol is a kind of a immunopathology that does not fear prick does not hold if it is an axon. sent6: an indoor thing fears Malawian and is not cyclonic. sent7: there is something such that if it does fear prick then it is a lankiness and it is not a pizzicato. sent8: there is something such that if it gladdens cynodont the fact that it is a Leucadendron and it does not fear Malawian is false. sent9: if something does fear prick then that it is a lankiness and it is not a kind of a pizzicato is not right. sent10: if the catamountain fears prick it is a kind of a lankiness and is not a pizzicato. sent11: if the catamountain is a sociable then the fact that the fact that it gladdens Gidar and it is a Leucadendron is not incorrect is not right. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a roadkill hold then the fact that it is a crater and it is not psycholinguistic is incorrect. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Siouan that it is a kind of a implicitness and it is not a Ukrainian does not hold. sent14: if the Malawian is a lankiness the fact that it is a kind of apocryphal thing that is a antiphony does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it does tessellate that it repairs Tecumseh and is a crater does not hold. sent16: the fact that that something is a lankiness and is a pizzicato is not wrong is not true if it does fear prick. sent17: something that fears prick is a lankiness but not a pizzicato. sent18: if the catamountain does fear prick then the fact that it is a roadkill that does not horripilate is false. sent19: something is a tracheid that does not repair catamountain if it is a kind of a generic.
sent9 -> int1: that the catamountain is a lankiness and is not a kind of a pizzicato is wrong if it fears prick.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it fears prick then the fact that that it is a lankiness and it is not a pizzicato is not wrong is incorrect is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the catamountain is a immunopathology and it is subarctic is wrong if it repairs capitol. sent2: if the catamountain is Boeotian then that it does fear amicability and is a kind of a lankiness is not true. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if it does fear prick the fact that that it is a lankiness and it is a kind of a pizzicato is correct does not hold is not false. sent4: there is something such that if it is a catamountain that it is a splice and it does scruple is not true. sent5: the fact that the capitol is a kind of a immunopathology that does not fear prick does not hold if it is an axon. sent6: an indoor thing fears Malawian and is not cyclonic. sent7: there is something such that if it does fear prick then it is a lankiness and it is not a pizzicato. sent8: there is something such that if it gladdens cynodont the fact that it is a Leucadendron and it does not fear Malawian is false. sent9: if something does fear prick then that it is a lankiness and it is not a kind of a pizzicato is not right. sent10: if the catamountain fears prick it is a kind of a lankiness and is not a pizzicato. sent11: if the catamountain is a sociable then the fact that the fact that it gladdens Gidar and it is a Leucadendron is not incorrect is not right. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a roadkill hold then the fact that it is a crater and it is not psycholinguistic is incorrect. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Siouan that it is a kind of a implicitness and it is not a Ukrainian does not hold. sent14: if the Malawian is a lankiness the fact that it is a kind of apocryphal thing that is a antiphony does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it does tessellate that it repairs Tecumseh and is a crater does not hold. sent16: the fact that that something is a lankiness and is a pizzicato is not wrong is not true if it does fear prick. sent17: something that fears prick is a lankiness but not a pizzicato. sent18: if the catamountain does fear prick then the fact that it is a roadkill that does not horripilate is false. sent19: something is a tracheid that does not repair catamountain if it is a kind of a generic. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the catamountain is a lankiness and is not a kind of a pizzicato is wrong if it fears prick.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__