there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an aphid that it is non-juiceless thing that does not harangue incineration is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is an aphid that it is non-juiceless thing that does not harangue incineration is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a trombonist is right then it is not a Bourgogne and it does not harangue conductance. sent3: the sheller is not juiceless and it does not harangue incineration if it is not a kind of an aphid. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of an aphid then the fact that it is not juiceless and it harangues incineration is false. sent5: the fact that something does not harangue mower and is not an aphid is wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of a fun is true. sent6: that the sheller is not a stiffener and is not a kind of a bill is wrong if it harangues commanding. sent7: there is something such that if it is not an aphid then it is not juiceless and it does not harangue incineration. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a distraction then that it is not cataclinal and does not harangue Saek is false. sent9: if the sheller is not a kind of an aphid that it is not juiceless and it does not harangue incineration is not right.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
if the ossicle is not a fun then that it does not harangue mower and it is not an aphid is not true.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an aphid that it is non-juiceless thing that does not harangue incineration is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is an aphid that it is non-juiceless thing that does not harangue incineration is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a trombonist is right then it is not a Bourgogne and it does not harangue conductance. sent3: the sheller is not juiceless and it does not harangue incineration if it is not a kind of an aphid. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of an aphid then the fact that it is not juiceless and it harangues incineration is false. sent5: the fact that something does not harangue mower and is not an aphid is wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of a fun is true. sent6: that the sheller is not a stiffener and is not a kind of a bill is wrong if it harangues commanding. sent7: there is something such that if it is not an aphid then it is not juiceless and it does not harangue incineration. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a distraction then that it is not cataclinal and does not harangue Saek is false. sent9: if the sheller is not a kind of an aphid that it is not juiceless and it does not harangue incineration is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__