that the ligule is a kind of a Calgary that is not feudatory is not correct.
sent1: the stabilizer does not winnow commonalty and it is not a Esquire. sent2: the stabilizer is not a Esquire. sent3: that the comer bogs underachievement is correct. sent4: if something that is a Esquire does winnow commonalty the ligule is agranulocytic. sent5: if something is not agranulocytic that it does not bog underachievement and it is a Esquire is wrong. sent6: if something does mortar and it bogs underachievement that the ligule is not a Calgary is not true. sent7: That the underachievement bogs comer is correct. sent8: the ligule is nonthermal. sent9: the infliximab is both not a roots and not inextricable. sent10: the comer does root and it is a howler if the ligule does not mortar. sent11: the comer is a mortar. sent12: something bogs underachievement. sent13: if the stabilizer does not winnow commonalty and is not a kind of a Esquire the ligule is a kind of a Esquire. sent14: if something is a kind of a Esquire that is agranulocytic then it is not feudatory. sent15: if something is courteous thing that is diligent it is not thermodynamic. sent16: if the stabilizer is not a Esquire but a Calgary then the ligule is not a Calgary. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it does not palatalize and does not yodel Fornax is right. sent18: the stabilizer is not agranulocytic if the fact that the puddle is nonthermal and/or it does not winnow commonalty is not correct. sent19: if something is not a Calgary then it bogs underachievement and is not a mortar. sent20: the fact that either the puddle is nonthermal or it does not winnow commonalty or both is false if it is not thermodynamic. sent21: the ligule is agranulocytic if it is nonthermal. sent22: the puddle is courteous.
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the comer mortars and it bogs underachievement is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: something mortars and does bog underachievement.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the ligule is a kind of a Calgary.; sent14 -> int4: the ligule is not feudatory if it is a Esquire and it is agranulocytic.; sent13 & sent1 -> int5: the ligule is a Esquire.; sent21 & sent8 -> int6: the ligule is agranulocytic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the ligule is a Esquire and it is agranulocytic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the ligule is not feudatory.; int3 & int8 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that it roots and is a howler.
sent19 -> int9: the ligule does bog underachievement and is not a mortar if it is not a Calgary.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ligule is a kind of a Calgary that is not feudatory is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the stabilizer does not winnow commonalty and it is not a Esquire. sent2: the stabilizer is not a Esquire. sent3: that the comer bogs underachievement is correct. sent4: if something that is a Esquire does winnow commonalty the ligule is agranulocytic. sent5: if something is not agranulocytic that it does not bog underachievement and it is a Esquire is wrong. sent6: if something does mortar and it bogs underachievement that the ligule is not a Calgary is not true. sent7: That the underachievement bogs comer is correct. sent8: the ligule is nonthermal. sent9: the infliximab is both not a roots and not inextricable. sent10: the comer does root and it is a howler if the ligule does not mortar. sent11: the comer is a mortar. sent12: something bogs underachievement. sent13: if the stabilizer does not winnow commonalty and is not a kind of a Esquire the ligule is a kind of a Esquire. sent14: if something is a kind of a Esquire that is agranulocytic then it is not feudatory. sent15: if something is courteous thing that is diligent it is not thermodynamic. sent16: if the stabilizer is not a Esquire but a Calgary then the ligule is not a Calgary. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it does not palatalize and does not yodel Fornax is right. sent18: the stabilizer is not agranulocytic if the fact that the puddle is nonthermal and/or it does not winnow commonalty is not correct. sent19: if something is not a Calgary then it bogs underachievement and is not a mortar. sent20: the fact that either the puddle is nonthermal or it does not winnow commonalty or both is false if it is not thermodynamic. sent21: the ligule is agranulocytic if it is nonthermal. sent22: the puddle is courteous. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the comer mortars and it bogs underachievement is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: something mortars and does bog underachievement.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the ligule is a kind of a Calgary.; sent14 -> int4: the ligule is not feudatory if it is a Esquire and it is agranulocytic.; sent13 & sent1 -> int5: the ligule is a Esquire.; sent21 & sent8 -> int6: the ligule is agranulocytic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the ligule is a Esquire and it is agranulocytic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the ligule is not feudatory.; int3 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__