that the supervisor does not stunt schoolyard and does stunt abbreviation is not true.
sent1: if the supervisor is a garishness then the teff is pro-life. sent2: the towline is not a Lemmus if there is something such that that it is a Lemmus and Methodist is not right. sent3: if the teff is a brochette the supervisor does not stunt schoolyard and stunts abbreviation. sent4: that the temporizer is not disrespectful hold if the fact that the schoolyard does not confront and is not anemometric does not hold. sent5: if the temporizer is a kind of a Lemmus and/or it does bankrupt expectation the teff does not confront. sent6: the schoolyard does bankrupt expectation if the towline is not a kind of a Lemmus. sent7: if the teff stunts abbreviation then the supervisor does not confront. sent8: if the jail is not a kind of a hometown then it is not cellular and it is not a brochette. sent9: if something does not confront that it is not anemometric and is not disrespectful is not false. sent10: that the supervisor stunts schoolyard and stunts abbreviation is false. sent11: if something bankrupts expectation the fact that the fact that it does not confront and is not anemometric is not incorrect is incorrect. sent12: the supervisor is a kind of a garishness if it is a brochette. sent13: that the catfish does not bankrupt fiftieth but it is bioclimatic is not correct. sent14: if there exists something such that it decrepitates the fact that the frail is a Lemmus and is a kind of a Methodist is incorrect. sent15: if something does not decimate then it is not a finish and is not a camouflage. sent16: if something is pro-life then the fact that it is not anemometric and is not disrespectful is not right. sent17: if something does not confront then it is not disrespectful. sent18: the temporizer is a kind of a Lemmus or it bankrupts expectation or both. sent19: that the fact that the main does not decrepitate is incorrect is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the supervisor is a brochette.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the supervisor is a garishness.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the teff is pro-life.; sent16 -> int3: if the teff is pro-life the fact that it is a kind of non-anemometric thing that is not disrespectful does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the teff is not anemometric and not disrespectful is not incorrect does not hold.; sent9 -> int5: the teff is not anemometric and is not disrespectful if it does not confront.; sent5 & sent18 -> int6: the teff does not confront.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the teff is not anemometric and it is not disrespectful.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the supervisor is not a brochette is not wrong.;
the supervisor does not stunt schoolyard and stunts abbreviation.
sent11 -> int10: if the schoolyard bankrupts expectation that it does not confront and is not anemometric does not hold.; sent19 -> int11: something decrepitates.; int11 & sent14 -> int12: that the fact that the frail is a Lemmus and it is a Methodist is not wrong is incorrect.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Lemmus and it is Methodist is false.; int13 & sent2 -> int14: the towline is not a Lemmus.; sent6 & int14 -> int15: that the schoolyard does bankrupt expectation is not wrong.; int10 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the schoolyard does not confront and it is not anemometric is not true.; sent4 & int16 -> int17: the temporizer is not disrespectful.;
$hypothesis$ = that the supervisor does not stunt schoolyard and does stunt abbreviation is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the supervisor is a garishness then the teff is pro-life. sent2: the towline is not a Lemmus if there is something such that that it is a Lemmus and Methodist is not right. sent3: if the teff is a brochette the supervisor does not stunt schoolyard and stunts abbreviation. sent4: that the temporizer is not disrespectful hold if the fact that the schoolyard does not confront and is not anemometric does not hold. sent5: if the temporizer is a kind of a Lemmus and/or it does bankrupt expectation the teff does not confront. sent6: the schoolyard does bankrupt expectation if the towline is not a kind of a Lemmus. sent7: if the teff stunts abbreviation then the supervisor does not confront. sent8: if the jail is not a kind of a hometown then it is not cellular and it is not a brochette. sent9: if something does not confront that it is not anemometric and is not disrespectful is not false. sent10: that the supervisor stunts schoolyard and stunts abbreviation is false. sent11: if something bankrupts expectation the fact that the fact that it does not confront and is not anemometric is not incorrect is incorrect. sent12: the supervisor is a kind of a garishness if it is a brochette. sent13: that the catfish does not bankrupt fiftieth but it is bioclimatic is not correct. sent14: if there exists something such that it decrepitates the fact that the frail is a Lemmus and is a kind of a Methodist is incorrect. sent15: if something does not decimate then it is not a finish and is not a camouflage. sent16: if something is pro-life then the fact that it is not anemometric and is not disrespectful is not right. sent17: if something does not confront then it is not disrespectful. sent18: the temporizer is a kind of a Lemmus or it bankrupts expectation or both. sent19: that the fact that the main does not decrepitate is incorrect is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the supervisor is a brochette.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the supervisor is a garishness.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the teff is pro-life.; sent16 -> int3: if the teff is pro-life the fact that it is a kind of non-anemometric thing that is not disrespectful does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the teff is not anemometric and not disrespectful is not incorrect does not hold.; sent9 -> int5: the teff is not anemometric and is not disrespectful if it does not confront.; sent5 & sent18 -> int6: the teff does not confront.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the teff is not anemometric and it is not disrespectful.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the supervisor is not a brochette is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__