that the mouse offers exorcist and does purify does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the mouse is both not a Pylodictus and a terry does not hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Pylodictus. sent2: the differentiation is not a kind of a primary if that the exorcist is dictyopteran but it is not a convertible is false. sent3: if there is something such that it is a kind of a preemptor then that the mesocolon is a terry is not incorrect. sent4: if the mesocolon is a kind of a terry then the pion is a Pylodictus. sent5: the pion is a Neapolitan and it is occupational. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a Neapolitan that the venom is not a kind of a Neapolitan but it is anisometropic is false. sent7: the mesocolon purifies and is a ketohexose. sent8: the mesocolon is not a kind of a Pylodictus if something is a Neapolitan and it is occupational. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a terry then the fact that the Fang is a watt but it does not offer exorcist is false. sent10: the fact that something is orthographic but it is not an equivocation is wrong if it is favorable. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is packable and it is not a kind of a preemptor is incorrect the mesocolon is a terry. sent12: if the pion is Neapolitan then the fact that the mesocolon is not occupational and does not purify does not hold. sent13: the differentiation is a Trollope or is favorable or both if it is not a primary. sent14: the pion is not a Pylodictus. sent15: if something does alibi perversity but it is not a Derain then it is a kind of a Neapolitan. sent16: if the fact that the venom is both not a Neapolitan and not non-anisometropic is wrong then the pion is a Neapolitan. sent17: if that the mouse is not a kind of a Pylodictus but it is a terry is wrong then it is not a terry. sent18: there is nothing such that it is dictyopteran and it is not a kind of a convertible. sent19: the fact that the NAD is packable but it is not a kind of a preemptor is incorrect if the fact that the mouse does not offer exorcist hold. sent20: the maceration alibis perversity and is not a Derain if the annoyance is not orthographic. sent21: the annoyance is not orthographic if the fact that the pickaninny is both orthographic and not an equivocation is wrong. sent22: the mouse purifies. sent23: if the differentiation is a kind of a Trollope the pickaninny is favorable. sent24: the NAD is a kind of a Pylodictus if there is something such that that it is not occupational and does not purify is not correct. sent25: if the differentiation is favorable then the pickaninny is not favorable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the mouse does not offer exorcist is not incorrect.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the NAD is packable and not a preemptor is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is packable and it is not a kind of a preemptor is wrong.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the mesocolon is a terry.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the pion is a kind of a Pylodictus.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mouse offers exorcist.; int6 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
that the Fang is a watt but it does not offer exorcist is not right.
sent15 -> int7: the maceration is a Neapolitan if it does alibi perversity and is not a Derain.; sent10 -> int8: if the pickaninny is favorable then that it is orthographic and it is not a kind of an equivocation is wrong.; sent18 -> int9: the fact that the exorcist is a kind of dictyopteran thing that is not a convertible is false.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the differentiation is non-primary.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: either the differentiation is a kind of a Trollope or it is favorable or both.; int11 & sent23 & sent25 -> int12: the pickaninny is favorable.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the pickaninny is orthographic but it is not an equivocation does not hold.; sent21 & int13 -> int14: the annoyance is not orthographic.; sent20 & int14 -> int15: the maceration does alibi perversity and is not a Derain.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the maceration is a Neapolitan.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is a kind of a Neapolitan.; int17 & sent6 -> int18: the fact that the venom is not Neapolitan but it is anisometropic is not right.; sent16 & int18 -> int19: the pion is a kind of a Neapolitan.; sent12 & int19 -> int20: that the mesocolon is not occupational and does not purify does not hold.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that the fact that it is not occupational and it does not purify is wrong.; int21 & sent24 -> int22: the NAD is a Pylodictus.; int22 -> int23: there is something such that that it is a Pylodictus hold.; int23 & sent1 -> int24: that that the mouse is not a Pylodictus but it is a terry is correct is not right.; sent17 & int24 -> int25: the mouse is not a kind of a terry.; int25 -> int26: there is something such that it is not a terry.; int26 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the mouse offers exorcist and does purify does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mouse is both not a Pylodictus and a terry does not hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Pylodictus. sent2: the differentiation is not a kind of a primary if that the exorcist is dictyopteran but it is not a convertible is false. sent3: if there is something such that it is a kind of a preemptor then that the mesocolon is a terry is not incorrect. sent4: if the mesocolon is a kind of a terry then the pion is a Pylodictus. sent5: the pion is a Neapolitan and it is occupational. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a Neapolitan that the venom is not a kind of a Neapolitan but it is anisometropic is false. sent7: the mesocolon purifies and is a ketohexose. sent8: the mesocolon is not a kind of a Pylodictus if something is a Neapolitan and it is occupational. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a terry then the fact that the Fang is a watt but it does not offer exorcist is false. sent10: the fact that something is orthographic but it is not an equivocation is wrong if it is favorable. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it is packable and it is not a kind of a preemptor is incorrect the mesocolon is a terry. sent12: if the pion is Neapolitan then the fact that the mesocolon is not occupational and does not purify does not hold. sent13: the differentiation is a Trollope or is favorable or both if it is not a primary. sent14: the pion is not a Pylodictus. sent15: if something does alibi perversity but it is not a Derain then it is a kind of a Neapolitan. sent16: if the fact that the venom is both not a Neapolitan and not non-anisometropic is wrong then the pion is a Neapolitan. sent17: if that the mouse is not a kind of a Pylodictus but it is a terry is wrong then it is not a terry. sent18: there is nothing such that it is dictyopteran and it is not a kind of a convertible. sent19: the fact that the NAD is packable but it is not a kind of a preemptor is incorrect if the fact that the mouse does not offer exorcist hold. sent20: the maceration alibis perversity and is not a Derain if the annoyance is not orthographic. sent21: the annoyance is not orthographic if the fact that the pickaninny is both orthographic and not an equivocation is wrong. sent22: the mouse purifies. sent23: if the differentiation is a kind of a Trollope the pickaninny is favorable. sent24: the NAD is a kind of a Pylodictus if there is something such that that it is not occupational and does not purify is not correct. sent25: if the differentiation is favorable then the pickaninny is not favorable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the mouse does not offer exorcist is not incorrect.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the NAD is packable and not a preemptor is false.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is packable and it is not a kind of a preemptor is wrong.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the mesocolon is a terry.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the pion is a kind of a Pylodictus.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the mouse offers exorcist.; int6 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__