if that the sunflower is not a kind of a polony is correct the fact that the popover is not a retrospective and not a porkfish is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the popover is not a kind of a retrospective and is a porkfish is false. sent2: if something is prejudicial it is a kind of a polony. sent3: that there is something such that it does not stint popover and it is not uncial hold. sent4: if the minge does not wrestle SLS then the fact that either it is a Fafnir or it is a kind of a feminist or both does not hold. sent5: if something does not wrestle horn it is not a hug and it is not an outboard. sent6: that that the popover is not retrospective but a porkfish is false is right if the sunflower is not a kind of a polony. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is a Fafnir or it is a kind of a feminist or both is not true then the horn does not wrestle horn. sent8: if the horn is not a hug then that the fact that the SLS is not a xeroradiography and/or it is not epicurean does not hold is not false. sent9: something does not stint sunflower. sent10: the sunflower is not a deep and it does not interject if the SLS is a polony. sent11: the minge does not wrestle SLS. sent12: that the popover is a kind of a retrospective but it is not a porkfish does not hold. sent13: something is prejudicial if the fact that it is not a xeroradiography and/or it is not epicurean is not true. sent14: the popover is not morphologic. sent15: if something is not a kind of a porkfish and is not a retrospective the popover is a polony. sent16: there exists something such that it is non-retrospective and it is a kind of a porkfish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the popover is not retrospective and not a porkfish.; assump1 -> int1: something is non-retrospective thing that is not a porkfish.;
there exists something such that it is not deep and it does not interject.
sent2 -> int2: that the SLS is a polony is not incorrect if it is prejudicial.; sent13 -> int3: the SLS is prejudicial if the fact that it either is not a kind of a xeroradiography or is non-epicurean or both does not hold.; sent5 -> int4: if the horn does not wrestle horn then the fact that it is not a hug and is not an outboard is right.; sent4 & sent11 -> int5: the fact that the minge is a Fafnir and/or it is feminist is not right.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it is a Fafnir and/or it is not non-feminist is incorrect.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the horn wrestles horn is not correct.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the horn is not a hug but non-outboard.; int8 -> int9: the horn does not hug.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the SLS is not a xeroradiography or not epicurean or both is not right.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the SLS is prejudicial.; int2 & int11 -> int12: the SLS is a kind of a polony.; sent10 & int12 -> int13: the sunflower is a kind of non-deep thing that does not interject.; int13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if that the sunflower is not a kind of a polony is correct the fact that the popover is not a retrospective and not a porkfish is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the popover is not a kind of a retrospective and is a porkfish is false. sent2: if something is prejudicial it is a kind of a polony. sent3: that there is something such that it does not stint popover and it is not uncial hold. sent4: if the minge does not wrestle SLS then the fact that either it is a Fafnir or it is a kind of a feminist or both does not hold. sent5: if something does not wrestle horn it is not a hug and it is not an outboard. sent6: that that the popover is not retrospective but a porkfish is false is right if the sunflower is not a kind of a polony. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is a Fafnir or it is a kind of a feminist or both is not true then the horn does not wrestle horn. sent8: if the horn is not a hug then that the fact that the SLS is not a xeroradiography and/or it is not epicurean does not hold is not false. sent9: something does not stint sunflower. sent10: the sunflower is not a deep and it does not interject if the SLS is a polony. sent11: the minge does not wrestle SLS. sent12: that the popover is a kind of a retrospective but it is not a porkfish does not hold. sent13: something is prejudicial if the fact that it is not a xeroradiography and/or it is not epicurean is not true. sent14: the popover is not morphologic. sent15: if something is not a kind of a porkfish and is not a retrospective the popover is a polony. sent16: there exists something such that it is non-retrospective and it is a kind of a porkfish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the popover is not retrospective and not a porkfish.; assump1 -> int1: something is non-retrospective thing that is not a porkfish.; __UNKNOWN__