the vassal does blackmail Ludian.
sent1: that the cortisone does not shoot and is not a coxsackievirus does not hold if it is not a wash-and-wear. sent2: the fact that the isogamete is both not a wash-and-wear and a coxsackievirus does not hold. sent3: that the swindler blackmails imitation and does not shoot is not right if that the cortisone is a coxsackievirus hold. sent4: the fact that the cortisone is not a wash-and-wear is not incorrect if that it is a posset and it is a wash-and-wear is not right. sent5: if a galena erases Lutheranism the fact that it is not a Fahd is correct. sent6: if the vassal does not blackmail Ludian that the Siren does not erase Lutheranism and is a Fahd is not correct. sent7: the fact that the cortisone is a kind of a posset and it is a kind of a wash-and-wear does not hold. sent8: the vassal is not sarcolemmal. sent9: the fact that the tanglebush is not lively but it does flay does not hold. sent10: if the vassal is not a kind of a galena then it erases Pipile and it is not sarcolemmal. sent11: the vassal blackmails Ludian if it is not a Fahd. sent12: the swindler is not vulvar but it is a kind of a galena if the cortisone does erase Lutheranism. sent13: if something is a shoot the fact that the vassal is not a shoot and is vulvar is wrong. sent14: if the vassal is not a galena then it is not sarcolemmal. sent15: the vassal is a cud that does not erase patricide. sent16: if the fact that something is both not a shoot and vulvar is wrong then it is not vulvar. sent17: the vassal is vulvar if it does erase Pipile. sent18: something is a kind of a shoot. sent19: the vassal blackmails imitation. sent20: something does erase Lutheranism and is a Fahd if it does not blackmail imitation. sent21: if that the isogamete is not a kind of a wash-and-wear but it is a kind of a coxsackievirus is false then the cortisone is a kind of a coxsackievirus. sent22: the vassal does erase Lutheranism and it blackmails imitation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vassal is not a galena.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the vassal does erase Pipile but it is not sarcolemmal.; int1 -> int2: the vassal erases Pipile.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the vassal is not non-vulvar.; sent16 -> int4: the vassal is non-vulvar if the fact that it is not a shoot but non-vulvar is not right.; sent18 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the vassal is not a shoot but it is vulvar is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the vassal is not vulvar is true.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the vassal is a galena.; sent22 -> int9: the vassal erases Lutheranism.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the vassal is a galena and it does erase Lutheranism.; sent5 -> int11: the vassal is not a Fahd if it is a galena and it does erase Lutheranism.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the vassal is not a Fahd.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the vassal does not blackmail Ludian.
sent20 -> int13: if the cortisone does not blackmail imitation it erases Lutheranism and it is a Fahd.; sent4 & sent7 -> int14: the cortisone is not a wash-and-wear.; sent1 & int14 -> int15: that the cortisone does not shoot and is not a coxsackievirus is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the vassal does blackmail Ludian. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cortisone does not shoot and is not a coxsackievirus does not hold if it is not a wash-and-wear. sent2: the fact that the isogamete is both not a wash-and-wear and a coxsackievirus does not hold. sent3: that the swindler blackmails imitation and does not shoot is not right if that the cortisone is a coxsackievirus hold. sent4: the fact that the cortisone is not a wash-and-wear is not incorrect if that it is a posset and it is a wash-and-wear is not right. sent5: if a galena erases Lutheranism the fact that it is not a Fahd is correct. sent6: if the vassal does not blackmail Ludian that the Siren does not erase Lutheranism and is a Fahd is not correct. sent7: the fact that the cortisone is a kind of a posset and it is a kind of a wash-and-wear does not hold. sent8: the vassal is not sarcolemmal. sent9: the fact that the tanglebush is not lively but it does flay does not hold. sent10: if the vassal is not a kind of a galena then it erases Pipile and it is not sarcolemmal. sent11: the vassal blackmails Ludian if it is not a Fahd. sent12: the swindler is not vulvar but it is a kind of a galena if the cortisone does erase Lutheranism. sent13: if something is a shoot the fact that the vassal is not a shoot and is vulvar is wrong. sent14: if the vassal is not a galena then it is not sarcolemmal. sent15: the vassal is a cud that does not erase patricide. sent16: if the fact that something is both not a shoot and vulvar is wrong then it is not vulvar. sent17: the vassal is vulvar if it does erase Pipile. sent18: something is a kind of a shoot. sent19: the vassal blackmails imitation. sent20: something does erase Lutheranism and is a Fahd if it does not blackmail imitation. sent21: if that the isogamete is not a kind of a wash-and-wear but it is a kind of a coxsackievirus is false then the cortisone is a kind of a coxsackievirus. sent22: the vassal does erase Lutheranism and it blackmails imitation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vassal is not a galena.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the vassal does erase Pipile but it is not sarcolemmal.; int1 -> int2: the vassal erases Pipile.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the vassal is not non-vulvar.; sent16 -> int4: the vassal is non-vulvar if the fact that it is not a shoot but non-vulvar is not right.; sent18 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the vassal is not a shoot but it is vulvar is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the vassal is not vulvar is true.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the vassal is a galena.; sent22 -> int9: the vassal erases Lutheranism.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the vassal is a galena and it does erase Lutheranism.; sent5 -> int11: the vassal is not a Fahd if it is a galena and it does erase Lutheranism.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the vassal is not a Fahd.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__