the fact that if the apery occurs then not the throning but the automaticness occurs is not right.
sent1: that the apery does not occur is triggered by that the throning happens and the wailing centrex happens. sent2: the Labor happens. sent3: the serigraphy does not occur and the stress happens if the murineness occurs. sent4: the maintaining bullshit occurs. sent5: the maintaining bullshit occurs if the dinning does not occur. sent6: the maintaining chela happens. sent7: if the dinning does not occur then the maintaining bullshit happens and the demagnetizing leafed occurs. sent8: the furrowing and the suckling Myopus happens. sent9: that the suckling Myopus occurs is true. sent10: the automaticness happens if the demagnetizing leafed happens. sent11: the figure occurs. sent12: the Labor happens and the wailing centrex occurs. sent13: the covering happens and the maintaining bran occurs if the commitment does not occur. sent14: the dinning does not occur if the furrow occurs. sent15: that the apery does not occur is prevented by that the throning occurs and the wailing centrex happens.
sent12 -> int1: the wailing centrex occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the throning occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the throne occurs and the wailing centrex occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the apery does not occur hold.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the apery happens.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the throning does not occur.; sent8 -> int6: that the furrowing occurs is true.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the dinning does not occur.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: both the maintaining bullshit and the demagnetizing leafed occurs.; int8 -> int9: the demagnetizing leafed occurs.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the automaticness occurs.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the throning does not occur and the automatic happens.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the apery occurs then not the throning but the automaticness occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the apery does not occur is triggered by that the throning happens and the wailing centrex happens. sent2: the Labor happens. sent3: the serigraphy does not occur and the stress happens if the murineness occurs. sent4: the maintaining bullshit occurs. sent5: the maintaining bullshit occurs if the dinning does not occur. sent6: the maintaining chela happens. sent7: if the dinning does not occur then the maintaining bullshit happens and the demagnetizing leafed occurs. sent8: the furrowing and the suckling Myopus happens. sent9: that the suckling Myopus occurs is true. sent10: the automaticness happens if the demagnetizing leafed happens. sent11: the figure occurs. sent12: the Labor happens and the wailing centrex occurs. sent13: the covering happens and the maintaining bran occurs if the commitment does not occur. sent14: the dinning does not occur if the furrow occurs. sent15: that the apery does not occur is prevented by that the throning occurs and the wailing centrex happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the wailing centrex occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the throning occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the throne occurs and the wailing centrex occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the apery does not occur hold.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the apery happens.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the throning does not occur.; sent8 -> int6: that the furrowing occurs is true.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the dinning does not occur.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: both the maintaining bullshit and the demagnetizing leafed occurs.; int8 -> int9: the demagnetizing leafed occurs.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the automaticness occurs.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the throning does not occur and the automatic happens.; [assump2] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__