something is not a clavicle and is not seismological.
sent1: the styracosaur is not a clavicle. sent2: if the rattlesnake does dissociate lettuce the lettuce is a kind of a seventh. sent3: if the store is not a bitter-bark the fact that the lettuce does dissociate buckminsterfullerene and it is Democratic is not right. sent4: there exists something such that it is not predictable. sent5: that the styracosaur is not Democratic is right. sent6: the styracosaur is not a clavicle and it is not seismological if the pigeonhole is not seismological. sent7: if the pigeonhole is not seismological the styracosaur is not a clavicle. sent8: the styracosaur is not a kind of a seventh. sent9: the store is not a bitter-bark. sent10: if the pigeonhole is seismological then the rattlesnake dissociates lettuce. sent11: the linendraper does not aggregate zinger and it is not seismological. sent12: if the lettuce is not Democratic the styracosaur is not seismological and it is not Democratic. sent13: the lettuce is not a seventh if it is not Democratic. sent14: if the fact that something does dissociate buckminsterfullerene and is Democratic does not hold then it is not a seventh. sent15: that the pigeonhole is a seventh and is seismological is not true if the lettuce does not dissociate buckminsterfullerene. sent16: the fact that something is a clavicle but it is not seismological is not incorrect. sent17: something is not a bitter-bark and does not dissociate lettuce. sent18: the lettuce is not a kind of a bitter-bark if the store is not a seventh. sent19: the pigeonhole does not dissociate buckminsterfullerene. sent20: the barnacle is a clavicle. sent21: if something is not Democratic then that it is not a seventh is correct. sent22: there exists something such that it is not seismological. sent23: there exists something such that it is both not a clavicle and seismological. sent24: there is something such that it is not a clavicle. sent25: the store does not dissociate lettuce.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pigeonhole is seismological.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the rattlesnake dissociates lettuce.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the lettuce is a seventh.; sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the lettuce does dissociate buckminsterfullerene and is Democratic does not hold it is not a kind of a seventh.; sent3 & sent9 -> int4: that the lettuce does dissociate buckminsterfullerene and is Democratic is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the lettuce is not a seventh.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the pigeonhole is not seismological.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the styracosaur is not a clavicle and it is not seismological.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = something is not a clavicle and is not seismological. ; $context$ = sent1: the styracosaur is not a clavicle. sent2: if the rattlesnake does dissociate lettuce the lettuce is a kind of a seventh. sent3: if the store is not a bitter-bark the fact that the lettuce does dissociate buckminsterfullerene and it is Democratic is not right. sent4: there exists something such that it is not predictable. sent5: that the styracosaur is not Democratic is right. sent6: the styracosaur is not a clavicle and it is not seismological if the pigeonhole is not seismological. sent7: if the pigeonhole is not seismological the styracosaur is not a clavicle. sent8: the styracosaur is not a kind of a seventh. sent9: the store is not a bitter-bark. sent10: if the pigeonhole is seismological then the rattlesnake dissociates lettuce. sent11: the linendraper does not aggregate zinger and it is not seismological. sent12: if the lettuce is not Democratic the styracosaur is not seismological and it is not Democratic. sent13: the lettuce is not a seventh if it is not Democratic. sent14: if the fact that something does dissociate buckminsterfullerene and is Democratic does not hold then it is not a seventh. sent15: that the pigeonhole is a seventh and is seismological is not true if the lettuce does not dissociate buckminsterfullerene. sent16: the fact that something is a clavicle but it is not seismological is not incorrect. sent17: something is not a bitter-bark and does not dissociate lettuce. sent18: the lettuce is not a kind of a bitter-bark if the store is not a seventh. sent19: the pigeonhole does not dissociate buckminsterfullerene. sent20: the barnacle is a clavicle. sent21: if something is not Democratic then that it is not a seventh is correct. sent22: there exists something such that it is not seismological. sent23: there exists something such that it is both not a clavicle and seismological. sent24: there is something such that it is not a clavicle. sent25: the store does not dissociate lettuce. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pigeonhole is seismological.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the rattlesnake dissociates lettuce.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the lettuce is a seventh.; sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the lettuce does dissociate buckminsterfullerene and is Democratic does not hold it is not a kind of a seventh.; sent3 & sent9 -> int4: that the lettuce does dissociate buckminsterfullerene and is Democratic is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the lettuce is not a seventh.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the pigeonhole is not seismological.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the styracosaur is not a clavicle and it is not seismological.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__