that the mycologist is not a Rawalpindi and it is not a Sajama is false.
sent1: that the mycologist is a Rawalpindi and is not a Sajama does not hold. sent2: the cryolite is a Caspian if it is Hugoesque. sent3: the fact that the fact that the helvella is both not bureaucratic and not a Sajama is not true hold. sent4: the mayhaw is not a subsidence and does indurate. sent5: the fact that the mycologist is not a Rawalpindi but a Sajama does not hold. sent6: if the helvella is not a Hybanthus then the fact that the mycologist is not a Rawalpindi but it is a Sajama is false. sent7: if that there exists something such that it is not a Caspian is not incorrect then the fact that the cryolite is not a PABA but it is a kind of a Caspian is not correct. sent8: if something is a Rawalpindi it is a kind of non-Hugoesque a Caspian. sent9: the fact that the helvella is not a kind of a Hybanthus is correct if it is sympatric and it is bureaucratic. sent10: something is a Caspian. sent11: something is a Caspian if it is a kind of a Hybanthus. sent12: the cryolite is Hugoesque if the fact that the helvella is both sympatric and not bureaucratic does not hold. sent13: that the cryolite is not a Caspian is wrong. sent14: if the helvella is not a Hybanthus then that that the mycologist is not a kind of a Rawalpindi and it is not a kind of a Sajama is not correct is correct. sent15: the helvella is not bureaucratic. sent16: if that the helvella is not a Caspian and it is not Hugoesque is not true the fact that the mycologist is not a kind of a Rawalpindi is true. sent17: the cryolite is Hugoesque if that the helvella is bureaucratic is not false. sent18: the sternutator is a kind of Hugoesque thing that is a rill. sent19: something is not a kind of a Caspian. sent20: if the helvella is sympatric and non-bureaucratic then it is not a Hybanthus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the helvella is sympatric but it is not bureaucratic is incorrect.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the cryolite is Hugoesque.; sent19 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the cryolite is not a kind of a PABA and is a kind of a Caspian does not hold.;
the mycologist is both not a Rawalpindi and not a Sajama.
sent18 -> int3: that the sternutator is Hugoesque is not incorrect.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is Hugoesque.;
$hypothesis$ = that the mycologist is not a Rawalpindi and it is not a Sajama is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mycologist is a Rawalpindi and is not a Sajama does not hold. sent2: the cryolite is a Caspian if it is Hugoesque. sent3: the fact that the fact that the helvella is both not bureaucratic and not a Sajama is not true hold. sent4: the mayhaw is not a subsidence and does indurate. sent5: the fact that the mycologist is not a Rawalpindi but a Sajama does not hold. sent6: if the helvella is not a Hybanthus then the fact that the mycologist is not a Rawalpindi but it is a Sajama is false. sent7: if that there exists something such that it is not a Caspian is not incorrect then the fact that the cryolite is not a PABA but it is a kind of a Caspian is not correct. sent8: if something is a Rawalpindi it is a kind of non-Hugoesque a Caspian. sent9: the fact that the helvella is not a kind of a Hybanthus is correct if it is sympatric and it is bureaucratic. sent10: something is a Caspian. sent11: something is a Caspian if it is a kind of a Hybanthus. sent12: the cryolite is Hugoesque if the fact that the helvella is both sympatric and not bureaucratic does not hold. sent13: that the cryolite is not a Caspian is wrong. sent14: if the helvella is not a Hybanthus then that that the mycologist is not a kind of a Rawalpindi and it is not a kind of a Sajama is not correct is correct. sent15: the helvella is not bureaucratic. sent16: if that the helvella is not a Caspian and it is not Hugoesque is not true the fact that the mycologist is not a kind of a Rawalpindi is true. sent17: the cryolite is Hugoesque if that the helvella is bureaucratic is not false. sent18: the sternutator is a kind of Hugoesque thing that is a rill. sent19: something is not a kind of a Caspian. sent20: if the helvella is sympatric and non-bureaucratic then it is not a Hybanthus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the helvella is sympatric but it is not bureaucratic is incorrect.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the cryolite is Hugoesque.; sent19 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the cryolite is not a kind of a PABA and is a kind of a Caspian does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__