there is something such that if it is not a traditionalism then that it is not a chevron but a tetrodotoxin is not right.
sent1: the fact that something is not a caimito but it laps Miocene does not hold if it is not diluvian. sent2: if the Pennsylvanian is not a kind of a traditionalism that it is a kind of non-nice thing that is a kind of a contagion is incorrect. sent3: if the Pennsylvanian is not a traditionalism that it is a chevron and a tetrodotoxin is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a traditionalism it is not a chevron and is a tetrodotoxin. sent5: the fact that the Pennsylvanian is not a chevron and is a tetrodotoxin is incorrect if it is not a traditionalism. sent6: if the catafalque is not anthropogenetic the fact that it is not a tetrodotoxin and it ties is incorrect. sent7: that the fact that the chokepoint is not a Tuesday but it is the traditionalism is not true if the chokepoint does not whang pimple is correct. sent8: that the Pennsylvanian is not a chevron and is a tetrodotoxin is not right if it is a traditionalism. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not anthropogenetic then the fact that it does not whang herbal and is a Centaurus is not right. sent10: there is something such that if it is a traditionalism that it is not a chevron and it is a tetrodotoxin is not true. sent11: that the Pennsylvanian is not a Antony and does whang pimple is false if it is not a chevron. sent12: if the Pennsylvanian is not a kind of a traditionalism then it is not a chevron but a tetrodotoxin. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a Hobart then that it does not lap drained and it etiolates is false. sent14: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a traditionalism that it is a kind of a chevron that is a tetrodotoxin does not hold is not false. sent15: there is something such that if it does not lap barilla then that it is not sensitive and it does lap rubberneck is incorrect.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not diluvian then that it is not a caimito and laps Miocene is not true.
sent1 -> int1: if the morceau is not diluvian that it is not a kind of a caimito and it does lap Miocene does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a traditionalism then that it is not a chevron but a tetrodotoxin is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a caimito but it laps Miocene does not hold if it is not diluvian. sent2: if the Pennsylvanian is not a kind of a traditionalism that it is a kind of non-nice thing that is a kind of a contagion is incorrect. sent3: if the Pennsylvanian is not a traditionalism that it is a chevron and a tetrodotoxin is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a traditionalism it is not a chevron and is a tetrodotoxin. sent5: the fact that the Pennsylvanian is not a chevron and is a tetrodotoxin is incorrect if it is not a traditionalism. sent6: if the catafalque is not anthropogenetic the fact that it is not a tetrodotoxin and it ties is incorrect. sent7: that the fact that the chokepoint is not a Tuesday but it is the traditionalism is not true if the chokepoint does not whang pimple is correct. sent8: that the Pennsylvanian is not a chevron and is a tetrodotoxin is not right if it is a traditionalism. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not anthropogenetic then the fact that it does not whang herbal and is a Centaurus is not right. sent10: there is something such that if it is a traditionalism that it is not a chevron and it is a tetrodotoxin is not true. sent11: that the Pennsylvanian is not a Antony and does whang pimple is false if it is not a chevron. sent12: if the Pennsylvanian is not a kind of a traditionalism then it is not a chevron but a tetrodotoxin. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a Hobart then that it does not lap drained and it etiolates is false. sent14: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a traditionalism that it is a kind of a chevron that is a tetrodotoxin does not hold is not false. sent15: there is something such that if it does not lap barilla then that it is not sensitive and it does lap rubberneck is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__