the deception occurs if the gastrointestinalness happens.
sent1: that the outgrowing cordgrass occurs leads to that the tossing documentation happens and the tossing labyrinthodont does not occur. sent2: that the eremiticness occurs hold. sent3: that the branching mousse and the pro-choiceness happens is brought about by that the improvement does not occur. sent4: the untuning occurs. sent5: that the tossing labyrinthodont does not occur brings about that the deception happens and the gastrointestinalness does not occur. sent6: if the nonresistance does not occur then that both the idealness and the improvement happens is incorrect. sent7: both the Hell and the clerkship happens if the untuning does not occur. sent8: the improvement does not occur if that the ideal and the improvement occurs is not true. sent9: that the gastrointestinalness does not occur is prevented by that the pro-choiceness and the clerkship occurs. sent10: that the pro-choiceness does not occur yields the deception. sent11: the untuning does not occur if both the deception and the non-gastrointestinalness happens. sent12: the immobilization happens. sent13: the non-gastrointestinalness is caused by that the pro-choiceness and the clerkship happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gastrointestinalness occurs is not wrong.;
the branching mousse occurs and the Hell happens.
$hypothesis$ = the deception occurs if the gastrointestinalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the outgrowing cordgrass occurs leads to that the tossing documentation happens and the tossing labyrinthodont does not occur. sent2: that the eremiticness occurs hold. sent3: that the branching mousse and the pro-choiceness happens is brought about by that the improvement does not occur. sent4: the untuning occurs. sent5: that the tossing labyrinthodont does not occur brings about that the deception happens and the gastrointestinalness does not occur. sent6: if the nonresistance does not occur then that both the idealness and the improvement happens is incorrect. sent7: both the Hell and the clerkship happens if the untuning does not occur. sent8: the improvement does not occur if that the ideal and the improvement occurs is not true. sent9: that the gastrointestinalness does not occur is prevented by that the pro-choiceness and the clerkship occurs. sent10: that the pro-choiceness does not occur yields the deception. sent11: the untuning does not occur if both the deception and the non-gastrointestinalness happens. sent12: the immobilization happens. sent13: the non-gastrointestinalness is caused by that the pro-choiceness and the clerkship happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gastrointestinalness occurs is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__