the fact that the glucoside is nonarbitrable is right.
sent1: the fact that the antitauon is complimentary is not wrong. sent2: the glucoside is a serology. sent3: the doubles does not homestead wiggliness if the frotteur does homestead wiggliness. sent4: if something is not a kind of a rent it does homestead wiggliness and is a serology. sent5: if the doubles is not a kind of a serology and does not homestead wiggliness the CO is a kind of a rent. sent6: if the CO rents that the antitauon is a kind of a staddle is not incorrect. sent7: the frotteur does homestead wiggliness if it is correct. sent8: the CO rents if the doubles is not a kind of a serology but it does homestead wiggliness. sent9: the frotteur does correct. sent10: the doubles is not a serology and it does not homestead wiggliness if the frotteur homestead wiggliness. sent11: if the antitauon is both a self-heal and complimentary the glucoside is not nonarbitrable. sent12: something is a self-heal if the fact that it is a staddle is correct. sent13: the doubles does not homestead wiggliness.
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the frotteur does homestead wiggliness.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the doubles is not a serology and it does not homestead wiggliness.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the CO does rent.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the antitauon is a kind of a staddle.; sent12 -> int5: the antitauon is a self-heal if it is a staddle.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antitauon is a kind of a self-heal.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the antitauon is a self-heal and it is complimentary.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the glucoside is nonarbitrable.
sent4 -> int8: the fact that the CO does homestead wiggliness and is a serology is correct if it is not a rent.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the glucoside is nonarbitrable is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the antitauon is complimentary is not wrong. sent2: the glucoside is a serology. sent3: the doubles does not homestead wiggliness if the frotteur does homestead wiggliness. sent4: if something is not a kind of a rent it does homestead wiggliness and is a serology. sent5: if the doubles is not a kind of a serology and does not homestead wiggliness the CO is a kind of a rent. sent6: if the CO rents that the antitauon is a kind of a staddle is not incorrect. sent7: the frotteur does homestead wiggliness if it is correct. sent8: the CO rents if the doubles is not a kind of a serology but it does homestead wiggliness. sent9: the frotteur does correct. sent10: the doubles is not a serology and it does not homestead wiggliness if the frotteur homestead wiggliness. sent11: if the antitauon is both a self-heal and complimentary the glucoside is not nonarbitrable. sent12: something is a self-heal if the fact that it is a staddle is correct. sent13: the doubles does not homestead wiggliness. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the frotteur does homestead wiggliness.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the doubles is not a serology and it does not homestead wiggliness.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the CO does rent.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the antitauon is a kind of a staddle.; sent12 -> int5: the antitauon is a self-heal if it is a staddle.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antitauon is a kind of a self-heal.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the antitauon is a self-heal and it is complimentary.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__