that if the fact that the platform upgrades religionist is not incorrect the jacksnipe tinges Balochi is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of a Hindu and/or it is not flimsy is not correct then it does tinge Balochi. sent2: the contadino upgrades religionist. sent3: if there exists something such that that it does tinge Balochi and does upgrade religionist does not hold the fact that the jacksnipe does tinge loanblend is not incorrect. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a butternut and it tinges loanblend hold does not hold then that the platform does not upgrade religionist is not false. sent5: that the contadino is a kind of a butternut that tinges loanblend is not true if the religionist is not a knitting. sent6: there is something such that it is not non-eutrophic but a thermopile. sent7: that the platform is a mind and it is a kind of a probable is false. sent8: that the contadino tinges Balochi or does not tinge loanblend or both is wrong. sent9: the contadino is not flimsy if there exists something such that that it is a butternut and does knit is false. sent10: the contadino does not tinge Balochi if the jacksnipe tinges loanblend. sent11: the religionist does not knit if the jacksnipe is not flimsy. sent12: the fact that the platform upgrades splitsville and/or it does not tinge Balochi is not true. sent13: the jacksnipe tinges loanblend if the contadino is flimsy. sent14: the religionist does not knit if the jacksnipe is a Hindu. sent15: the fact that the fact that the contadino either is a kind of a knitting or does not tinge loanblend or both is true is not true. sent16: the jacksnipe does upgrade religionist if the platform is flimsy. sent17: the fact that the jacksnipe is circulative is right. sent18: the fact that the platform does tinge fibroblast and/or it is not a merited is not true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that either the jacksnipe is a kind of a Hindu or it is not flimsy or both.; assump2 & sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the religionist does not knit.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the contadino is a butternut and tinges loanblend does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is a butternut that does tinge loanblend is not correct.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the platform does not upgrade religionist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the platform does upgrade religionist is not wrong.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the jacksnipe is a kind of a Hindu or is not flimsy or both is not right.; sent1 -> int7: if the fact that either the jacksnipe is a Hindu or it is not flimsy or both is not right it does tinge Balochi.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the jacksnipe tinges Balochi.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the fact that the platform upgrades religionist is not incorrect the jacksnipe tinges Balochi is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of a Hindu and/or it is not flimsy is not correct then it does tinge Balochi. sent2: the contadino upgrades religionist. sent3: if there exists something such that that it does tinge Balochi and does upgrade religionist does not hold the fact that the jacksnipe does tinge loanblend is not incorrect. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a butternut and it tinges loanblend hold does not hold then that the platform does not upgrade religionist is not false. sent5: that the contadino is a kind of a butternut that tinges loanblend is not true if the religionist is not a knitting. sent6: there is something such that it is not non-eutrophic but a thermopile. sent7: that the platform is a mind and it is a kind of a probable is false. sent8: that the contadino tinges Balochi or does not tinge loanblend or both is wrong. sent9: the contadino is not flimsy if there exists something such that that it is a butternut and does knit is false. sent10: the contadino does not tinge Balochi if the jacksnipe tinges loanblend. sent11: the religionist does not knit if the jacksnipe is not flimsy. sent12: the fact that the platform upgrades splitsville and/or it does not tinge Balochi is not true. sent13: the jacksnipe tinges loanblend if the contadino is flimsy. sent14: the religionist does not knit if the jacksnipe is a Hindu. sent15: the fact that the fact that the contadino either is a kind of a knitting or does not tinge loanblend or both is true is not true. sent16: the jacksnipe does upgrade religionist if the platform is flimsy. sent17: the fact that the jacksnipe is circulative is right. sent18: the fact that the platform does tinge fibroblast and/or it is not a merited is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that either the jacksnipe is a kind of a Hindu or it is not flimsy or both.; assump2 & sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the religionist does not knit.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the contadino is a butternut and tinges loanblend does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is a butternut that does tinge loanblend is not correct.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the platform does not upgrade religionist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the platform does upgrade religionist is not wrong.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the jacksnipe is a kind of a Hindu or is not flimsy or both is not right.; sent1 -> int7: if the fact that either the jacksnipe is a Hindu or it is not flimsy or both is not right it does tinge Balochi.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the jacksnipe tinges Balochi.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__