the fact that there is something such that if it is minimal and it is not a kind of a Australopithecus then it is totemic is not correct.
sent1: the conditions is ontological if it is a trump that does bethink rigout. sent2: if something blackmails valedictorian but it is not a kind of a stonewaller it is minimal. sent3: that the conditions is totemic is not wrong if it is minimal and it is not a Australopithecus. sent4: there exists something such that if it is minimal thing that is a Australopithecus then it is totemic. sent5: there is something such that if it does blackmail valedictorian and does not blackmail cabinetwork then it bethinks frustum.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the cabinetwork is minimal if it does blackmail valedictorian and is not a stonewaller.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is minimal and it is not a kind of a Australopithecus then it is totemic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the conditions is ontological if it is a trump that does bethink rigout. sent2: if something blackmails valedictorian but it is not a kind of a stonewaller it is minimal. sent3: that the conditions is totemic is not wrong if it is minimal and it is not a Australopithecus. sent4: there exists something such that if it is minimal thing that is a Australopithecus then it is totemic. sent5: there is something such that if it does blackmail valedictorian and does not blackmail cabinetwork then it bethinks frustum. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__