that that the monocarpicness occurs brings about the messianicness does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the mounting occurs hold. sent2: the etiology does not occur. sent3: the psychometricness does not occur. sent4: the notification does not occur if the psychometricness does not occur. sent5: the affined does not occur. sent6: the messianicness happens if the stupefaction does not occur. sent7: the stupefaction is prevented by that not the literariness but the monocarpicness occurs. sent8: if that the literariness occurs is not incorrect then the notification occurs. sent9: the pouring occurs. sent10: that the logging does not occur and the landfall happens prevents that the handlessness happens. sent11: the consternating overabundance happens. sent12: the floweriness happens. sent13: that the imitation occurs hold if the sustainableness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the literariness occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the notification happens.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the notification does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the literariness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the monocarpicness happens.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: the literariness does not occur and the monocarpicness happens.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the stupefaction does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the messianicness occurs.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the monocarpicness occurs brings about the messianicness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mounting occurs hold. sent2: the etiology does not occur. sent3: the psychometricness does not occur. sent4: the notification does not occur if the psychometricness does not occur. sent5: the affined does not occur. sent6: the messianicness happens if the stupefaction does not occur. sent7: the stupefaction is prevented by that not the literariness but the monocarpicness occurs. sent8: if that the literariness occurs is not incorrect then the notification occurs. sent9: the pouring occurs. sent10: that the logging does not occur and the landfall happens prevents that the handlessness happens. sent11: the consternating overabundance happens. sent12: the floweriness happens. sent13: that the imitation occurs hold if the sustainableness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the literariness occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the notification happens.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the notification does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the literariness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the monocarpicness happens.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: the literariness does not occur and the monocarpicness happens.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the stupefaction does not occur.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the messianicness occurs.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__