the rust does dissimilate Brahma.
sent1: the weigher is not malignant if it does not unbrace. sent2: if the mystification hedges apojove and is a badge the azoimide is not a kind of a Newgate. sent3: if there is something such that it is nonsubmersible the azoimide does dissimilate candlenut. sent4: the rust does not dissimilate Brahma if the weigher is not malignant. sent5: the basic does not dissimilate Brahma. sent6: the rust does badge and hedges apojove if the mystification is not a kind of a Newgate. sent7: the azoimide does dissimilate candlenut and it is a Newgate if something is nonsubmersible. sent8: something dissimilates Brahma if it does hedge apojove. sent9: the azoimide does dissimilate candlenut. sent10: the weigher does not unbrace or is a country or both if the mystification is not a country. sent11: the fact that something is not a kind of a Newgate and it is not a country does not hold if it is not malignant. sent12: something is not a country if it does not hedge apojove. sent13: something is not malignant if it does not unbrace. sent14: the mystification is a kind of a badge. sent15: there are nonsubmersible things. sent16: if something either does not unbrace or is a country or both it is not malignant.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mystification does hedge apojove.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the mystification hedges apojove and it is a kind of a badge.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the azoimide is not a kind of a Newgate is not false.; sent15 & sent7 -> int3: the azoimide dissimilates candlenut and is a Newgate.; int3 -> int4: the azoimide is a Newgate.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the mystification does not hedge apojove is not incorrect.; sent12 -> int7: if the mystification does not hedge apojove it is not a kind of a country.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the mystification is not a country.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the weigher does not unbrace and/or is a kind of a country.; sent16 -> int10: if the weigher does not unbrace and/or it is a country then it is not malignant.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the weigher is not malignant.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the rust does dissimilate Brahma.
sent8 -> int12: if the rust does hedge apojove the fact that it does dissimilate Brahma is right.; sent11 -> int13: if the azoimide is non-malignant then that it is not a Newgate and it is not a country is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the rust does dissimilate Brahma. ; $context$ = sent1: the weigher is not malignant if it does not unbrace. sent2: if the mystification hedges apojove and is a badge the azoimide is not a kind of a Newgate. sent3: if there is something such that it is nonsubmersible the azoimide does dissimilate candlenut. sent4: the rust does not dissimilate Brahma if the weigher is not malignant. sent5: the basic does not dissimilate Brahma. sent6: the rust does badge and hedges apojove if the mystification is not a kind of a Newgate. sent7: the azoimide does dissimilate candlenut and it is a Newgate if something is nonsubmersible. sent8: something dissimilates Brahma if it does hedge apojove. sent9: the azoimide does dissimilate candlenut. sent10: the weigher does not unbrace or is a country or both if the mystification is not a country. sent11: the fact that something is not a kind of a Newgate and it is not a country does not hold if it is not malignant. sent12: something is not a country if it does not hedge apojove. sent13: something is not malignant if it does not unbrace. sent14: the mystification is a kind of a badge. sent15: there are nonsubmersible things. sent16: if something either does not unbrace or is a country or both it is not malignant. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mystification does hedge apojove.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the mystification hedges apojove and it is a kind of a badge.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the azoimide is not a kind of a Newgate is not false.; sent15 & sent7 -> int3: the azoimide dissimilates candlenut and is a Newgate.; int3 -> int4: the azoimide is a Newgate.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the mystification does not hedge apojove is not incorrect.; sent12 -> int7: if the mystification does not hedge apojove it is not a kind of a country.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the mystification is not a country.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the weigher does not unbrace and/or is a kind of a country.; sent16 -> int10: if the weigher does not unbrace and/or it is a country then it is not malignant.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the weigher is not malignant.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__