something is an anteater.
sent1: the bitters is not a tumblebug. sent2: if something does not hymn BJA then that it is a kind of a complex and it is a Socinus is not right. sent3: the cottonwood does not hymn BJA. sent4: the cottonwood is a kind of a tumblebug. sent5: if something is not a tumblebug then it does not hymn perfusion and is not radiological. sent6: if something is a kind of an anteater it does rectify. sent7: if the bitters is not a tumblebug and does not rectify then the cottonwood is an anteater. sent8: the bitters is inculpatory if there exists something such that that it is a complex and it is a Socinus is not correct. sent9: that something does not rectify but it is an anteater is wrong if it is inculpatory.
the scenario does not hymn perfusion and is not radiological.
sent5 -> int1: the scenario does not hymn perfusion and is non-radiological if it is not a tumblebug.; sent9 -> int2: if the bitters is inculpatory then that it does not rectify and is an anteater is wrong.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the cottonwood is a kind of complex a Socinus is wrong if it does not hymn BJA.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the cottonwood is a complex and it is a kind of a Socinus is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is complex and it is a Socinus does not hold.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: that the bitters is inculpatory is not false.; int2 & int6 -> int7: that the fact that the bitters does not rectify but it is an anteater does not hold is not incorrect.; int7 -> int8: that there is something such that that it does not rectify and is a kind of an anteater is wrong hold.;
$hypothesis$ = something is an anteater. ; $context$ = sent1: the bitters is not a tumblebug. sent2: if something does not hymn BJA then that it is a kind of a complex and it is a Socinus is not right. sent3: the cottonwood does not hymn BJA. sent4: the cottonwood is a kind of a tumblebug. sent5: if something is not a tumblebug then it does not hymn perfusion and is not radiological. sent6: if something is a kind of an anteater it does rectify. sent7: if the bitters is not a tumblebug and does not rectify then the cottonwood is an anteater. sent8: the bitters is inculpatory if there exists something such that that it is a complex and it is a Socinus is not correct. sent9: that something does not rectify but it is an anteater is wrong if it is inculpatory. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__