the continuing does not occur.
sent1: the insinuating does not occur and the disjoining does not occur if the foreness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the fact that the non-condylarness and the flickering Culex occurs is true does not hold if the flickering Pholadidae does not occur. sent3: the flickering eardrop is triggered by that the knocking mews or the non-logarithmicness or both occurs. sent4: that the flickering eardrop happens and the flickering Pholadidae occurs prevents that the transgressing occurs. sent5: if the flickering Culex does not occur the fact that the flickering Pholadidae does not occur and the flickering eardrop does not occur is not correct. sent6: the fact that the flickering Culex happens and the condylarness occurs does not hold if the enormity does not occur. sent7: that the flickering Pholadidae does not occur hold if the fact that either the knocking mews occurs or the logarithmicness does not occur or both is not right. sent8: the flickering eardrop does not occur but the enormity happens. sent9: that the misfeasance does not occur causes that the nuclearness does not occur and the flickering Veracruz does not occur. sent10: the enormity does not occur if the insinuating does not occur and the disjoining does not occur. sent11: the continuing happens if that the flickering Pholadidae does not occur and the flickering eardrop does not occur is not correct. sent12: if the flickering Culex does not occur the flickering eardrop and the flickering Pholadidae happens. sent13: the continuing does not occur if the fact that not the condylarness but the flickering Culex happens is incorrect. sent14: the flickering overspill and the non-foreness happens if the fact that the nuclearness does not occur is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the knocking mews and/or the non-logarithmicness occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the flickering eardrop occurs.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the flickering eardrop does not occur hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the knocking mews and/or the non-logarithmicness occurs is not true.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the flickering Pholadidae does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that not the condylarness but the flickering Culex occurs does not hold.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the continuing occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the continuing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the insinuating does not occur and the disjoining does not occur if the foreness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the fact that the non-condylarness and the flickering Culex occurs is true does not hold if the flickering Pholadidae does not occur. sent3: the flickering eardrop is triggered by that the knocking mews or the non-logarithmicness or both occurs. sent4: that the flickering eardrop happens and the flickering Pholadidae occurs prevents that the transgressing occurs. sent5: if the flickering Culex does not occur the fact that the flickering Pholadidae does not occur and the flickering eardrop does not occur is not correct. sent6: the fact that the flickering Culex happens and the condylarness occurs does not hold if the enormity does not occur. sent7: that the flickering Pholadidae does not occur hold if the fact that either the knocking mews occurs or the logarithmicness does not occur or both is not right. sent8: the flickering eardrop does not occur but the enormity happens. sent9: that the misfeasance does not occur causes that the nuclearness does not occur and the flickering Veracruz does not occur. sent10: the enormity does not occur if the insinuating does not occur and the disjoining does not occur. sent11: the continuing happens if that the flickering Pholadidae does not occur and the flickering eardrop does not occur is not correct. sent12: if the flickering Culex does not occur the flickering eardrop and the flickering Pholadidae happens. sent13: the continuing does not occur if the fact that not the condylarness but the flickering Culex happens is incorrect. sent14: the flickering overspill and the non-foreness happens if the fact that the nuclearness does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the knocking mews and/or the non-logarithmicness occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the flickering eardrop occurs.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the flickering eardrop does not occur hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the knocking mews and/or the non-logarithmicness occurs is not true.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the flickering Pholadidae does not occur.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that not the condylarness but the flickering Culex occurs does not hold.; int6 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__