there exists something such that if it does not weaken the fact that the fact that it does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon and does calve hold does not hold.
sent1: if that the lineation does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon is not incorrect then that it does not lexicalize ungraciousness and is a lexicology does not hold. sent2: something does not age cyproheptadine and is solar if it is not a kind of an asteroid. sent3: if something is not connate the fact that it is a kind of non-geographic thing that does age prism is not right. sent4: there exists something such that if it lexicalizes hundredweight then that it does not lexicalize northeaster and does lexicalize ungraciousness is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it does weaken that it does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon and it calves is not right. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not weaken the fact that it lexicalizes Hypsiprymnodon and calves is not right. sent7: if the lineation is not temperate then the fact that it does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon and it is a kind of a coronion does not hold. sent8: if the larid is not an antidepressant then the fact that it lexicalizes Hypsiprymnodon and is not non-axile is not right. sent9: something is a kind of non-postganglionic an antidepressant if it is not a crowd. sent10: if that the lineation does not weaken is right it is not Frostian and it does lexicalize dilatation. sent11: the fact that the teff is non-connate but it is a piperocaine is incorrect if it does bray. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not dolichocephalic then it is not a sarcosine but nominal. sent13: that the nuisance is a kind of bisontine thing that is horse-drawn does not hold if it does not weaken. sent14: that something does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon and does calve is false if it weakens.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not weaken the fact that the fact that it does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon and does calve hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the lineation does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon is not incorrect then that it does not lexicalize ungraciousness and is a lexicology does not hold. sent2: something does not age cyproheptadine and is solar if it is not a kind of an asteroid. sent3: if something is not connate the fact that it is a kind of non-geographic thing that does age prism is not right. sent4: there exists something such that if it lexicalizes hundredweight then that it does not lexicalize northeaster and does lexicalize ungraciousness is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it does weaken that it does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon and it calves is not right. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not weaken the fact that it lexicalizes Hypsiprymnodon and calves is not right. sent7: if the lineation is not temperate then the fact that it does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon and it is a kind of a coronion does not hold. sent8: if the larid is not an antidepressant then the fact that it lexicalizes Hypsiprymnodon and is not non-axile is not right. sent9: something is a kind of non-postganglionic an antidepressant if it is not a crowd. sent10: if that the lineation does not weaken is right it is not Frostian and it does lexicalize dilatation. sent11: the fact that the teff is non-connate but it is a piperocaine is incorrect if it does bray. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not dolichocephalic then it is not a sarcosine but nominal. sent13: that the nuisance is a kind of bisontine thing that is horse-drawn does not hold if it does not weaken. sent14: that something does not lexicalize Hypsiprymnodon and does calve is false if it weakens. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__