the misfit is deformational.
sent1: the misfit is deformational if the tor remainders spelter. sent2: if the Moor is not a kind of a cohune it is not a oxime and is not a cyborg. sent3: if the tor is not opposite and is a tillage then it eulogizes Vietnamese. sent4: the tor is a tillage if the Moor stifles MRD. sent5: the fact that the Moor is a kind of a oxime but it is not a cyborg is incorrect. sent6: if the Moor does stifle MRD the tor is both not opposite and a tillage. sent7: if something is deformational it does stifle MRD. sent8: if something eulogizes Vietnamese then it does remainder spelter. sent9: that the tor is a tillage is not wrong. sent10: that something is both non-deformational and not infallible is not true if it is not a cohune. sent11: that the Moor is not a kind of a oxime and it is not a cyborg does not hold. sent12: something does stifle MRD if it is a cohune. sent13: the fact that the Moor is both not a oxime and a cyborg does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Moor is not a kind of a cohune.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Moor is both not a oxime and not a cyborg.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Moor is a cohune.; sent12 -> int4: if the Moor is a cohune then it stifles MRD.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Moor stifles MRD.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the tor is not opposite but it is a tillage.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the tor does eulogize Vietnamese.; sent8 -> int8: if the tor eulogizes Vietnamese then it remainders spelter.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the tor remainders spelter.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Vietnamese is not deformational and is not infallible is not right.
sent10 -> int10: if the Vietnamese is not a cohune the fact that it is not deformational and it is not infallible is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the misfit is deformational. ; $context$ = sent1: the misfit is deformational if the tor remainders spelter. sent2: if the Moor is not a kind of a cohune it is not a oxime and is not a cyborg. sent3: if the tor is not opposite and is a tillage then it eulogizes Vietnamese. sent4: the tor is a tillage if the Moor stifles MRD. sent5: the fact that the Moor is a kind of a oxime but it is not a cyborg is incorrect. sent6: if the Moor does stifle MRD the tor is both not opposite and a tillage. sent7: if something is deformational it does stifle MRD. sent8: if something eulogizes Vietnamese then it does remainder spelter. sent9: that the tor is a tillage is not wrong. sent10: that something is both non-deformational and not infallible is not true if it is not a cohune. sent11: that the Moor is not a kind of a oxime and it is not a cyborg does not hold. sent12: something does stifle MRD if it is a cohune. sent13: the fact that the Moor is both not a oxime and a cyborg does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Moor is not a kind of a cohune.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Moor is both not a oxime and not a cyborg.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Moor is a cohune.; sent12 -> int4: if the Moor is a cohune then it stifles MRD.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Moor stifles MRD.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the tor is not opposite but it is a tillage.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the tor does eulogize Vietnamese.; sent8 -> int8: if the tor eulogizes Vietnamese then it remainders spelter.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the tor remainders spelter.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__