the fact that the monohydrate does not destine is not wrong.
sent1: that the monohydrate does bleed hold. sent2: that the nutrition is ruminant is right if it is not a kind of a Boselaphus. sent3: that the fact that the nutrition is a fortitude and/or pant-hoots is not correct hold. sent4: the nutrition is not a Onagraceae if either something is not a kind of a Onagraceae or it is a kind of an occupancy or both. sent5: either something is a Onagraceae or it is a kind of a fortitude or both. sent6: that the fathometer is a Boselaphus and/or it is nonruminant is not correct if it does not destine. sent7: the strongbox is adenocarcinomatous. sent8: that the nutrition does pant-hoot and/or it is a kind of a fortitude does not hold. sent9: if something is not a Onagraceae then it does not destine. sent10: the monohydrate is insurrectional. sent11: the senna is not a driver if it is not a kind of a wing. sent12: the fact that the nutrition is a wing and/or pant-hoots is not correct. sent13: the monohydrate is nonruminant. sent14: the monohydrate is a kind of a Boselaphus if the fathometer does not destine and/or is not a fortitude. sent15: if that the nutrition is nonruminant and/or it pant-hoots is not right the fathometer is not a Boselaphus. sent16: the fact that something either destines or is nonruminant or both is not correct if it is not a kind of a Boselaphus. sent17: the monohydrate does not pant-hoot. sent18: the nutrition is not an occupancy and/or scouts instrumentalism. sent19: if the monohydrate is a wing then it does destine. sent20: the fathometer is not an occupancy. sent21: if the fathometer is not a Boselaphus and/or is not a fortitude then the monohydrate is a wing. sent22: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Onagraceae and/or it is an occupancy. sent23: the fact that either the aye-aye is a kind of a megillah or it is a fortitude or both does not hold. sent24: if the forum is a kind of a Boselaphus and is not a kind of a fortitude the fathometer is a kind of a Onagraceae. sent25: that the monohydrate is a custom-made or it is an occupancy or both is false. sent26: the fact that something is nonruminant or it does pant-hoot or both is not right if it is not a Onagraceae.
sent26 -> int1: the fact that the nutrition is nonruminant or pant-hoots or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a Onagraceae.; sent22 & sent4 -> int2: the nutrition is not a kind of a Onagraceae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the nutrition is nonruminant or it pant-hoots or both is incorrect.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the fathometer is not a Boselaphus.; int4 -> int5: the fathometer is not a Boselaphus and/or it is not a kind of a fortitude.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the monohydrate is a wing.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the monohydrate does not destine.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the monohydrate does not destine is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the monohydrate does bleed hold. sent2: that the nutrition is ruminant is right if it is not a kind of a Boselaphus. sent3: that the fact that the nutrition is a fortitude and/or pant-hoots is not correct hold. sent4: the nutrition is not a Onagraceae if either something is not a kind of a Onagraceae or it is a kind of an occupancy or both. sent5: either something is a Onagraceae or it is a kind of a fortitude or both. sent6: that the fathometer is a Boselaphus and/or it is nonruminant is not correct if it does not destine. sent7: the strongbox is adenocarcinomatous. sent8: that the nutrition does pant-hoot and/or it is a kind of a fortitude does not hold. sent9: if something is not a Onagraceae then it does not destine. sent10: the monohydrate is insurrectional. sent11: the senna is not a driver if it is not a kind of a wing. sent12: the fact that the nutrition is a wing and/or pant-hoots is not correct. sent13: the monohydrate is nonruminant. sent14: the monohydrate is a kind of a Boselaphus if the fathometer does not destine and/or is not a fortitude. sent15: if that the nutrition is nonruminant and/or it pant-hoots is not right the fathometer is not a Boselaphus. sent16: the fact that something either destines or is nonruminant or both is not correct if it is not a kind of a Boselaphus. sent17: the monohydrate does not pant-hoot. sent18: the nutrition is not an occupancy and/or scouts instrumentalism. sent19: if the monohydrate is a wing then it does destine. sent20: the fathometer is not an occupancy. sent21: if the fathometer is not a Boselaphus and/or is not a fortitude then the monohydrate is a wing. sent22: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Onagraceae and/or it is an occupancy. sent23: the fact that either the aye-aye is a kind of a megillah or it is a fortitude or both does not hold. sent24: if the forum is a kind of a Boselaphus and is not a kind of a fortitude the fathometer is a kind of a Onagraceae. sent25: that the monohydrate is a custom-made or it is an occupancy or both is false. sent26: the fact that something is nonruminant or it does pant-hoot or both is not right if it is not a Onagraceae. ; $proof$ = 
sent26 -> int1: the fact that the nutrition is nonruminant or pant-hoots or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a Onagraceae.; sent22 & sent4 -> int2: the nutrition is not a kind of a Onagraceae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the nutrition is nonruminant or it pant-hoots or both is incorrect.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the fathometer is not a Boselaphus.; int4 -> int5: the fathometer is not a Boselaphus and/or it is not a kind of a fortitude.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the monohydrate is a wing.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__