the scandal does not occur.
sent1: the colloidalness occurs. sent2: that the trivializing custodianship does not occur triggers that the scandal and the theming atomization happens. sent3: if the trivializing White does not occur then the relation happens and/or the uncongenialness occurs. sent4: if that the epithelialness occurs and the gauging does not occur is wrong the trivializing White does not occur. sent5: the coating gristmill does not occur. sent6: the lashing occurs. sent7: the trivializing custodianship happens. sent8: that the coating gristmill occurs and the lashing does not occur prevents the non-colloidalness. sent9: if the knitting autonomy occurs then that not the cytolyticness but the knitting collation happens is false. sent10: both the relation and the knitting autonomy occurs. sent11: the colloidalness occurs if the theming atomization does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the theming atomization does not occur is not wrong then the scandal does not occur and the colloidalness happens. sent13: the non-prehistoricness is prevented by that the electric does not occur and the regionalness happens. sent14: that not the coating gristmill but the lashing happens prevents that the knitting collation does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the theming atomization happens.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the theming atomization happens and the trivializing custodianship occurs.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: not the coating gristmill but the lashing occurs.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: the knitting collation occurs.; sent10 -> int4: the knitting autonomy happens.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: that the non-cytolyticness and the knitting collation occurs is not right.;
that the scandal happens is right.
$hypothesis$ = the scandal does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the colloidalness occurs. sent2: that the trivializing custodianship does not occur triggers that the scandal and the theming atomization happens. sent3: if the trivializing White does not occur then the relation happens and/or the uncongenialness occurs. sent4: if that the epithelialness occurs and the gauging does not occur is wrong the trivializing White does not occur. sent5: the coating gristmill does not occur. sent6: the lashing occurs. sent7: the trivializing custodianship happens. sent8: that the coating gristmill occurs and the lashing does not occur prevents the non-colloidalness. sent9: if the knitting autonomy occurs then that not the cytolyticness but the knitting collation happens is false. sent10: both the relation and the knitting autonomy occurs. sent11: the colloidalness occurs if the theming atomization does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the theming atomization does not occur is not wrong then the scandal does not occur and the colloidalness happens. sent13: the non-prehistoricness is prevented by that the electric does not occur and the regionalness happens. sent14: that not the coating gristmill but the lashing happens prevents that the knitting collation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the theming atomization happens.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the theming atomization happens and the trivializing custodianship occurs.; sent5 & sent6 -> int2: not the coating gristmill but the lashing occurs.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: the knitting collation occurs.; sent10 -> int4: the knitting autonomy happens.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: that the non-cytolyticness and the knitting collation occurs is not right.; __UNKNOWN__