the thermometricness and the non-one-pieceness occurs.
sent1: the subtracting intransitivity does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the snowing combining does not occur and the encircling codex does not occur is false then the fact that the acyclicness happens is not incorrect. sent3: the demonetization does not occur. sent4: if both the Catholicness and the do-si-do occurs then the undemonstrativeness does not occur. sent5: if the distalness occurs and the traceableness occurs the federalizing harmonic does not occur. sent6: that not the mercantilism but the dualisticness happens does not hold. sent7: if the federalizing harmonic does not occur both the thermometricness and the non-one-pieceness happens. sent8: the fact that the proceduralness occurs but the snowing breadroot does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the anophelineness occurs. sent10: the unselfishness does not occur. sent11: the imposition happens. sent12: the bacteriostaticness does not occur. sent13: if the fact that both the non-anophelineness and the non-Ukrainianness occurs is wrong then the distalness occurs. sent14: both the Gilbertianness and the communications happens. sent15: if the demonetization does not occur the traceableness happens and the linearness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-anophelineness and the non-Ukrainianness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the anophelineness does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the non-anophelineness and the non-Ukrainianness happens is not correct.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the distalness happens.; sent15 & sent3 -> int5: the traceableness occurs and the linearness happens.; int5 -> int6: the traceableness occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: both the distalness and the traceableness occurs.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the federalizing harmonic does not occur.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the thermometricness and the non-one-pieceness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the subtracting intransitivity does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the snowing combining does not occur and the encircling codex does not occur is false then the fact that the acyclicness happens is not incorrect. sent3: the demonetization does not occur. sent4: if both the Catholicness and the do-si-do occurs then the undemonstrativeness does not occur. sent5: if the distalness occurs and the traceableness occurs the federalizing harmonic does not occur. sent6: that not the mercantilism but the dualisticness happens does not hold. sent7: if the federalizing harmonic does not occur both the thermometricness and the non-one-pieceness happens. sent8: the fact that the proceduralness occurs but the snowing breadroot does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the anophelineness occurs. sent10: the unselfishness does not occur. sent11: the imposition happens. sent12: the bacteriostaticness does not occur. sent13: if the fact that both the non-anophelineness and the non-Ukrainianness occurs is wrong then the distalness occurs. sent14: both the Gilbertianness and the communications happens. sent15: if the demonetization does not occur the traceableness happens and the linearness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-anophelineness and the non-Ukrainianness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the anophelineness does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the non-anophelineness and the non-Ukrainianness happens is not correct.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the distalness happens.; sent15 & sent3 -> int5: the traceableness occurs and the linearness happens.; int5 -> int6: the traceableness occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: both the distalness and the traceableness occurs.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the federalizing harmonic does not occur.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__