the archpriest does not impede overpopulation.
sent1: if the archpriest is not non-eosinophilic then it does not impede overpopulation and it does bank interceptor. sent2: that the fact that the bluethroat is both not a seventieth and not uncommon is not true if the valency does limit is correct. sent3: the monochrome does not impede Bosch and it is not conscious if it is not eosinophilic. sent4: if the shovelhead does not suggest impartiality and is not off then that it is expansionist is true. sent5: that the archpriest is not a ambusher and it does not impede Bosch is not false. sent6: the monochrome is a kind of non-uncommon thing that designates if it is eosinophilic. sent7: if the archpriest is a regimentation it is uncommon. sent8: the musnud is not common if there exists something such that the fact that it does bank interceptor and is not eosinophilic does not hold. sent9: the mullet is not a hematology. sent10: if that the mullet is not a kind of a hematology is true then the valency is a kind of a limiting and it perseverates Synge. sent11: that the monochrome does bank interceptor but it is not eosinophilic is not true if something does not designate. sent12: if the monochrome does not impede Bosch it is not a trailhead. sent13: if there are uncommon things then the monochrome designates. sent14: the monochrome does not bank interceptor. sent15: the falangist impedes Bosch. sent16: if something is not a kind of a limiting and it does not impede overpopulation the fact that it does not designate is not incorrect. sent17: if that the monochrome does not impede Bosch and it is not conscious is correct it does bank interceptor. sent18: The interceptor does not bank monochrome. sent19: the archpriest is not uncommon if it does not impede recession. sent20: if the monochrome is not uncommon but it designates that the archpriest impedes overpopulation is right. sent21: the valve is uncommon if the fact that the bluethroat is not a seventieth and it is not uncommon does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the monochrome is not eosinophilic.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the monochrome does not impede Bosch and it is not conscious.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the monochrome banks interceptor.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the monochrome is eosinophilic.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the monochrome is not uncommon and does designate.; int5 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the archpriest does not impede overpopulation.
sent10 & sent9 -> int6: the valency does limit and does perseverate Synge.; int6 -> int7: the valency limits.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: that the bluethroat is not a seventieth and is not uncommon is incorrect.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the valve is uncommon.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is uncommon.; int10 & sent13 -> int11: the monochrome designates.;
$hypothesis$ = the archpriest does not impede overpopulation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the archpriest is not non-eosinophilic then it does not impede overpopulation and it does bank interceptor. sent2: that the fact that the bluethroat is both not a seventieth and not uncommon is not true if the valency does limit is correct. sent3: the monochrome does not impede Bosch and it is not conscious if it is not eosinophilic. sent4: if the shovelhead does not suggest impartiality and is not off then that it is expansionist is true. sent5: that the archpriest is not a ambusher and it does not impede Bosch is not false. sent6: the monochrome is a kind of non-uncommon thing that designates if it is eosinophilic. sent7: if the archpriest is a regimentation it is uncommon. sent8: the musnud is not common if there exists something such that the fact that it does bank interceptor and is not eosinophilic does not hold. sent9: the mullet is not a hematology. sent10: if that the mullet is not a kind of a hematology is true then the valency is a kind of a limiting and it perseverates Synge. sent11: that the monochrome does bank interceptor but it is not eosinophilic is not true if something does not designate. sent12: if the monochrome does not impede Bosch it is not a trailhead. sent13: if there are uncommon things then the monochrome designates. sent14: the monochrome does not bank interceptor. sent15: the falangist impedes Bosch. sent16: if something is not a kind of a limiting and it does not impede overpopulation the fact that it does not designate is not incorrect. sent17: if that the monochrome does not impede Bosch and it is not conscious is correct it does bank interceptor. sent18: The interceptor does not bank monochrome. sent19: the archpriest is not uncommon if it does not impede recession. sent20: if the monochrome is not uncommon but it designates that the archpriest impedes overpopulation is right. sent21: the valve is uncommon if the fact that the bluethroat is not a seventieth and it is not uncommon does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the monochrome is not eosinophilic.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the monochrome does not impede Bosch and it is not conscious.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the monochrome banks interceptor.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the monochrome is eosinophilic.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the monochrome is not uncommon and does designate.; int5 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__