that the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg and/or is subdural is false.
sent1: that the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg but it is not a cut-in does not hold. sent2: the horseradish is a Brahmana. sent3: that the minge is a slob but it is not a carillonneur does not hold if the horseradish is not a cut-in. sent4: that the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg and/or subdural is incorrect if that the horseradish is not a Brahmana is not false. sent5: the minge is a Schonberg. sent6: the senior does satisfy and collects nabumetone. sent7: the fact that something is not a cut-in but it is a pia is wrong if it is not a kind of a slob. sent8: the talapoin does flabbergast Zeitgeist. sent9: if the polymyxin is a enkephalin then the fact that it is not Lilliputian and it is not auroral does not hold. sent10: the Sphacelotheca is a kind of a cut-in. sent11: the talapoin does flabbergast Zeitgeist and is subdural. sent12: that the talapoin is a Schonberg but it does not flabbergast Zeitgeist is not true if that the Sphacelotheca is not subdural is correct. sent13: the minge is Lilliputian if the fact that the polymyxin is not Lilliputian and it is not auroral is not right. sent14: the talapoin is a pia and it flabbergasts Zeitgeist. sent15: the talapoin is a cut-in. sent16: something is sericultural if it is a kind of a Lilliputian. sent17: the minge is a slob and a Schonberg. sent18: the talapoin is not a kind of a pia if the horseradish is a Brahmana and it is a cut-in. sent19: that the Sphacelotheca is a kind of a Schonberg if the fact that that the minge is a kind of a slob but it is not a kind of a carillonneur is not true hold is not wrong. sent20: the horseradish does not flabbergast Zeitgeist. sent21: that the horseradish is a Schonberg but it is not a kind of a Brahmana is not right. sent22: that something does not flabbergast Zeitgeist and is not a carillonneur does not hold if it is sericultural. sent23: the talapoin does flabbergast Zeitgeist and/or is a Schonberg. sent24: the polymyxin is a enkephalin and it is an uptake. sent25: the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg if the fact that the minge is not a slob is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the horseradish is a cut-in.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the horseradish is a Brahmana and a cut-in.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the talapoin is not a pia.; sent14 -> int3: that the talapoin is a pia is true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the horseradish is not a cut-in.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the minge is a slob but it is not a carillonneur is incorrect.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the Sphacelotheca is a kind of a Schonberg and/or it is subdural does not hold.
sent7 -> int8: the fact that the talapoin is not a cut-in but it is a pia is not right if it is not a slob.; sent22 -> int9: if the minge is sericultural that it does not flabbergast Zeitgeist and is not a carillonneur is not correct.; sent16 -> int10: the minge is sericultural if it is a Lilliputian.; sent24 -> int11: the polymyxin is a enkephalin.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the polymyxin is non-Lilliputian thing that is not auroral is false.; sent13 & int12 -> int13: that the minge is a Lilliputian is true.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the minge is not non-sericultural.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the minge does not flabbergast Zeitgeist and is not a carillonneur does not hold.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that the fact that it does not flabbergast Zeitgeist and is not a carillonneur is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg and/or is subdural is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg but it is not a cut-in does not hold. sent2: the horseradish is a Brahmana. sent3: that the minge is a slob but it is not a carillonneur does not hold if the horseradish is not a cut-in. sent4: that the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg and/or subdural is incorrect if that the horseradish is not a Brahmana is not false. sent5: the minge is a Schonberg. sent6: the senior does satisfy and collects nabumetone. sent7: the fact that something is not a cut-in but it is a pia is wrong if it is not a kind of a slob. sent8: the talapoin does flabbergast Zeitgeist. sent9: if the polymyxin is a enkephalin then the fact that it is not Lilliputian and it is not auroral does not hold. sent10: the Sphacelotheca is a kind of a cut-in. sent11: the talapoin does flabbergast Zeitgeist and is subdural. sent12: that the talapoin is a Schonberg but it does not flabbergast Zeitgeist is not true if that the Sphacelotheca is not subdural is correct. sent13: the minge is Lilliputian if the fact that the polymyxin is not Lilliputian and it is not auroral is not right. sent14: the talapoin is a pia and it flabbergasts Zeitgeist. sent15: the talapoin is a cut-in. sent16: something is sericultural if it is a kind of a Lilliputian. sent17: the minge is a slob and a Schonberg. sent18: the talapoin is not a kind of a pia if the horseradish is a Brahmana and it is a cut-in. sent19: that the Sphacelotheca is a kind of a Schonberg if the fact that that the minge is a kind of a slob but it is not a kind of a carillonneur is not true hold is not wrong. sent20: the horseradish does not flabbergast Zeitgeist. sent21: that the horseradish is a Schonberg but it is not a kind of a Brahmana is not right. sent22: that something does not flabbergast Zeitgeist and is not a carillonneur does not hold if it is sericultural. sent23: the talapoin does flabbergast Zeitgeist and/or is a Schonberg. sent24: the polymyxin is a enkephalin and it is an uptake. sent25: the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg if the fact that the minge is not a slob is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the horseradish is a cut-in.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the horseradish is a Brahmana and a cut-in.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the talapoin is not a pia.; sent14 -> int3: that the talapoin is a pia is true.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the horseradish is not a cut-in.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the minge is a slob but it is not a carillonneur is incorrect.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the Sphacelotheca is a Schonberg.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__