that the arrival intimates and it lexicalizes neuroplasty is not true.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a Delphinidae and a fingerstall is wrong then the unguiculate does not violate. sent2: the arrival does lexicalize neuroplasty if the fact that it is not a fingerstall and it is not a Delphinidae is false. sent3: the fact that the crest is not a kind of a Delphinidae and is a kind of a fingerstall does not hold. sent4: the crest is a kind of a triamcinolone but it does not welter if the unguiculate becomes. sent5: that something is a kind of a triamcinolone and does not welter does not hold if it does not violate. sent6: if the crest becomes the unguiculate does not becomes. sent7: the fact that the crest is a triamcinolone and it welters does not hold if it does not violate. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a fingerstall and it is not a Delphinidae is not right if it is not a Elinvar. sent9: the fact that something does lexicalize neuroplasty but it does not become does not hold if it does not intimate. sent10: the arrival does become. sent11: the arrival is not a Elinvar. sent12: if something is not a Elinvar the fact that it is a kind of a fingerstall that is not a Delphinidae is incorrect. sent13: the crest does not violate. sent14: the fact that the arrival is a fingerstall but it is not a Delphinidae does not hold. sent15: the plowboy intimates if there exists something such that it becomes. sent16: the arrival becomes if the unguiculate is a triamcinolone. sent17: if the arrival does not intimate the unguiculate does become. sent18: that something does not welter and does not batch foam is wrong if it intimates.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arrival does not intimate.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the unguiculate does become.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the crest is a triamcinolone that does not welter.; sent5 -> int3: if the crest does not violate then that it is a triamcinolone and does not welter is not right.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the crest is a triamcinolone that does not welter is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the arrival does intimate.; sent8 -> int7: if the arrival is not a Elinvar the fact that it is not a fingerstall and it is not a Delphinidae is false.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that the arrival is not a kind of a fingerstall and it is not a kind of a Delphinidae does not hold.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the arrival does lexicalize neuroplasty.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the arrival does intimate and does lexicalize neuroplasty is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the arrival intimates and it lexicalizes neuroplasty is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a Delphinidae and a fingerstall is wrong then the unguiculate does not violate. sent2: the arrival does lexicalize neuroplasty if the fact that it is not a fingerstall and it is not a Delphinidae is false. sent3: the fact that the crest is not a kind of a Delphinidae and is a kind of a fingerstall does not hold. sent4: the crest is a kind of a triamcinolone but it does not welter if the unguiculate becomes. sent5: that something is a kind of a triamcinolone and does not welter does not hold if it does not violate. sent6: if the crest becomes the unguiculate does not becomes. sent7: the fact that the crest is a triamcinolone and it welters does not hold if it does not violate. sent8: the fact that something is not a kind of a fingerstall and it is not a Delphinidae is not right if it is not a Elinvar. sent9: the fact that something does lexicalize neuroplasty but it does not become does not hold if it does not intimate. sent10: the arrival does become. sent11: the arrival is not a Elinvar. sent12: if something is not a Elinvar the fact that it is a kind of a fingerstall that is not a Delphinidae is incorrect. sent13: the crest does not violate. sent14: the fact that the arrival is a fingerstall but it is not a Delphinidae does not hold. sent15: the plowboy intimates if there exists something such that it becomes. sent16: the arrival becomes if the unguiculate is a triamcinolone. sent17: if the arrival does not intimate the unguiculate does become. sent18: that something does not welter and does not batch foam is wrong if it intimates. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arrival does not intimate.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the unguiculate does become.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the crest is a triamcinolone that does not welter.; sent5 -> int3: if the crest does not violate then that it is a triamcinolone and does not welter is not right.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the crest is a triamcinolone that does not welter is incorrect.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the arrival does intimate.; sent8 -> int7: if the arrival is not a Elinvar the fact that it is not a fingerstall and it is not a Delphinidae is false.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that the arrival is not a kind of a fingerstall and it is not a kind of a Delphinidae does not hold.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the arrival does lexicalize neuroplasty.; int6 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__