the sunshine is not a rheometer and not a oxidation-reduction.
sent1: there exists something such that that it does not unionize Trasimeno and is not automotive is not correct. sent2: the pug does not clink Campylorhynchus and is not automotive if it is a indigence. sent3: the muffler is not a rheometer if there exists something such that that it is superior and it is not a kind of a Sudbury is wrong. sent4: something does unionize Trasimeno and is a oxidation-reduction if it is not a kind of a gyrocompass. sent5: that the muffler is a scrofula is not wrong. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not unionize Trasimeno and it is not automotive is false the Galloway does unionize Trasimeno. sent7: the muffler is not a kind of a gyrocompass if the pug does not clink Campylorhynchus and is not automotive. sent8: if something is superior thing that is not a Sudbury the fact that it does not unionize Trasimeno is correct. sent9: the insolation does not melt and is not an illiterate. sent10: the insolation is not automotive if the fact that it is both automotive and not a indigence is wrong. sent11: there is something such that that it is not a Sudbury and is not a kind of a rheometer is not right. sent12: if the fact that something is a oxidation-reduction is not incorrect then the sunshine is a oxidation-reduction. sent13: something does not clink Campylorhynchus if it does not melt and it is not an illiterate. sent14: if there is something such that it does not unionize Trasimeno or is a kind of a gyrocompass or both the muffler does not unionize Trasimeno. sent15: if something is not automotive either the pug does not unionize Trasimeno or it is a gyrocompass or both. sent16: the Galloway is a kind of a rheometer. sent17: that something is both automotive and not a indigence is not true if it does not clink Campylorhynchus. sent18: the sunshine is not a rheometer and it is not a oxidation-reduction if the muffler is not a rheometer.
sent8 -> int1: the Galloway does not unionize Trasimeno if it is a superior and is not a Sudbury.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Galloway is superior but it is not a Sudbury.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Galloway does not unionize Trasimeno.; sent1 & sent6 -> int3: the Galloway unionizes Trasimeno.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the Galloway is a superior that is not a Sudbury hold is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it is superior and not a Sudbury does not hold.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the muffler is not a kind of a rheometer hold.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sunshine is not a rheometer and it is not a oxidation-reduction is incorrect.
sent17 -> int8: that the insolation is automotive but it is not a indigence is not correct if it does not clink Campylorhynchus.; sent13 -> int9: if the insolation does not melt and it is not an illiterate it does not clink Campylorhynchus.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the insolation does not clink Campylorhynchus.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the insolation is automotive but not a indigence is not correct.; sent10 & int11 -> int12: the insolation is not automotive.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not automotive.; int13 & sent15 -> int14: the pug either does not unionize Trasimeno or is a gyrocompass or both.; int14 -> int15: something does not unionize Trasimeno and/or is a gyrocompass.; int15 & sent14 -> int16: the muffler does not unionize Trasimeno.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it does not unionize Trasimeno.;
$hypothesis$ = the sunshine is not a rheometer and not a oxidation-reduction. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it does not unionize Trasimeno and is not automotive is not correct. sent2: the pug does not clink Campylorhynchus and is not automotive if it is a indigence. sent3: the muffler is not a rheometer if there exists something such that that it is superior and it is not a kind of a Sudbury is wrong. sent4: something does unionize Trasimeno and is a oxidation-reduction if it is not a kind of a gyrocompass. sent5: that the muffler is a scrofula is not wrong. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not unionize Trasimeno and it is not automotive is false the Galloway does unionize Trasimeno. sent7: the muffler is not a kind of a gyrocompass if the pug does not clink Campylorhynchus and is not automotive. sent8: if something is superior thing that is not a Sudbury the fact that it does not unionize Trasimeno is correct. sent9: the insolation does not melt and is not an illiterate. sent10: the insolation is not automotive if the fact that it is both automotive and not a indigence is wrong. sent11: there is something such that that it is not a Sudbury and is not a kind of a rheometer is not right. sent12: if the fact that something is a oxidation-reduction is not incorrect then the sunshine is a oxidation-reduction. sent13: something does not clink Campylorhynchus if it does not melt and it is not an illiterate. sent14: if there is something such that it does not unionize Trasimeno or is a kind of a gyrocompass or both the muffler does not unionize Trasimeno. sent15: if something is not automotive either the pug does not unionize Trasimeno or it is a gyrocompass or both. sent16: the Galloway is a kind of a rheometer. sent17: that something is both automotive and not a indigence is not true if it does not clink Campylorhynchus. sent18: the sunshine is not a rheometer and it is not a oxidation-reduction if the muffler is not a rheometer. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the Galloway does not unionize Trasimeno if it is a superior and is not a Sudbury.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Galloway is superior but it is not a Sudbury.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Galloway does not unionize Trasimeno.; sent1 & sent6 -> int3: the Galloway unionizes Trasimeno.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fact that the Galloway is a superior that is not a Sudbury hold is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it is superior and not a Sudbury does not hold.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the muffler is not a kind of a rheometer hold.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__