there exists something such that it is asyndetic.
sent1: something does not fret serviceability if that the fact that it is a kind of a meet and it redes grant hold is incorrect. sent2: if something does not adhere plagiarism the fact that it is not a kind of a portraitist and does rede increased is not true. sent3: the ubiquinone is asyndetic if it is secondary. sent4: the fact that the sambar is a portraitist and it does rede increased is false. sent5: if something is a hieratic it is not an umbilical and it is not a yellowbird. sent6: the sambar does meet. sent7: the troika is not emphysematous or does fret denominationalism or both. sent8: that the ubiquinone adheres plagiarism and it is a meet is incorrect. sent9: if the bondsman does not rede grant that the ubiquinone is a meet and it does rede grant does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the fact that the sambar is not a portraitist but it does rede increased is not false is false the ubiquinone is not a kind of a portraitist. sent11: that something does not fret serviceability and is asyndetic is incorrect if it is not a kind of a hieratic. sent12: if something that is not a kind of a portraitist does not fret serviceability it is a kind of a secondary. sent13: the sambar is not a meperidine and is not a Gomphotherium. sent14: if something is not a kind of a yellowbird then that it does rede lipoma and is a kind of a husk is incorrect. sent15: if the bondsman is not a kind of a secondary the fact that it is not a meet and/or it is a portraitist is not right. sent16: the suer is a kind of a secondary. sent17: if the bondsman is asyndetic it does laugh. sent18: the fact that the bondsman is not hieratic or does rede grant or both does not hold. sent19: that the bondsman is not a hieratic and frets serviceability is not true. sent20: the sambar does fret serviceability. sent21: The plagiarism does not adhere sambar. sent22: if the bondsman does not rede grant it is not a kind of a meet. sent23: if something that does not rede grant is not asyndetic then it is a kind of a hieratic. sent24: the fact that the sambar does forge and it does rede grant is not true. sent25: if there is something such that it does not rede grant and is a kind of a hieratic then the ubiquinone is not a Bahai. sent26: the fact that the bondsman is not a meet if the ubiquinone is a meet hold. sent27: if the sambar is a portraitist the ubiquinone is not a kind of a portraitist. sent28: the sambar does not adhere plagiarism.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bondsman does rede grant.; assump1 -> int1: the bondsman is not a hieratic or does rede grant or both.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the bondsman does not rede grant.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the ubiquinone is a meet and it does rede grant is incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the ubiquinone is a meet and redes grant does not hold then that it does not fret serviceability is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ubiquinone does not fret serviceability.; sent2 -> int7: if the sambar does not adhere plagiarism then that it is not a kind of a portraitist and does rede increased is not correct.; int7 & sent28 -> int8: that the sambar is not a portraitist and redes increased is not true.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the ubiquinone is not a portraitist.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the ubiquinone is not a kind of a portraitist and does not fret serviceability.; sent12 -> int11: if the ubiquinone is not a portraitist and it does not fret serviceability then the fact that it is a secondary is correct.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the ubiquinone is a secondary.; int12 & sent3 -> int13: that the ubiquinone is asyndetic hold.; int13 -> hypothesis;
the ubiquinone is a kind of non-umbilical thing that does not yellow.
sent5 -> int14: the ubiquinone is not an umbilical and it is not a yellowbird if it is hieratic.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is asyndetic. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not fret serviceability if that the fact that it is a kind of a meet and it redes grant hold is incorrect. sent2: if something does not adhere plagiarism the fact that it is not a kind of a portraitist and does rede increased is not true. sent3: the ubiquinone is asyndetic if it is secondary. sent4: the fact that the sambar is a portraitist and it does rede increased is false. sent5: if something is a hieratic it is not an umbilical and it is not a yellowbird. sent6: the sambar does meet. sent7: the troika is not emphysematous or does fret denominationalism or both. sent8: that the ubiquinone adheres plagiarism and it is a meet is incorrect. sent9: if the bondsman does not rede grant that the ubiquinone is a meet and it does rede grant does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the fact that the sambar is not a portraitist but it does rede increased is not false is false the ubiquinone is not a kind of a portraitist. sent11: that something does not fret serviceability and is asyndetic is incorrect if it is not a kind of a hieratic. sent12: if something that is not a kind of a portraitist does not fret serviceability it is a kind of a secondary. sent13: the sambar is not a meperidine and is not a Gomphotherium. sent14: if something is not a kind of a yellowbird then that it does rede lipoma and is a kind of a husk is incorrect. sent15: if the bondsman is not a kind of a secondary the fact that it is not a meet and/or it is a portraitist is not right. sent16: the suer is a kind of a secondary. sent17: if the bondsman is asyndetic it does laugh. sent18: the fact that the bondsman is not hieratic or does rede grant or both does not hold. sent19: that the bondsman is not a hieratic and frets serviceability is not true. sent20: the sambar does fret serviceability. sent21: The plagiarism does not adhere sambar. sent22: if the bondsman does not rede grant it is not a kind of a meet. sent23: if something that does not rede grant is not asyndetic then it is a kind of a hieratic. sent24: the fact that the sambar does forge and it does rede grant is not true. sent25: if there is something such that it does not rede grant and is a kind of a hieratic then the ubiquinone is not a Bahai. sent26: the fact that the bondsman is not a meet if the ubiquinone is a meet hold. sent27: if the sambar is a portraitist the ubiquinone is not a kind of a portraitist. sent28: the sambar does not adhere plagiarism. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bondsman does rede grant.; assump1 -> int1: the bondsman is not a hieratic or does rede grant or both.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the bondsman does not rede grant.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that the ubiquinone is a meet and it does rede grant is incorrect.; sent1 -> int5: if the fact that the ubiquinone is a meet and redes grant does not hold then that it does not fret serviceability is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ubiquinone does not fret serviceability.; sent2 -> int7: if the sambar does not adhere plagiarism then that it is not a kind of a portraitist and does rede increased is not correct.; int7 & sent28 -> int8: that the sambar is not a portraitist and redes increased is not true.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the ubiquinone is not a portraitist.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the ubiquinone is not a kind of a portraitist and does not fret serviceability.; sent12 -> int11: if the ubiquinone is not a portraitist and it does not fret serviceability then the fact that it is a secondary is correct.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the ubiquinone is a secondary.; int12 & sent3 -> int13: that the ubiquinone is asyndetic hold.; int13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__