the ocean is a Vaishnavism.
sent1: the analphabet deplores trait. sent2: the analphabet does deplore trait and it does bask Hazardia. sent3: that something does not bask Hazardia and it is not joyful is not correct if it is a Vaishnavism. sent4: if the tinter does not deplore trait then the analphabet deplore trait. sent5: there exists something such that it is joyful. sent6: there exists something such that it does bask Hazardia. sent7: if something is not a redistribution then it is a kind of a Vaishnavism and it is a lymphoblast. sent8: the fact that the ocean is not a Vaishnavism is not incorrect if the analphabet is not a Vaishnavism and does not bask Hazardia. sent9: if the fact that the analphabet is not joyful and it is not a redistribution is not true then the fact that it is joyful is not wrong. sent10: that the analphabet is joyful and is not a redistribution is not correct. sent11: the fact that the analphabet is not joyful and it is not a redistribution does not hold. sent12: if something that is joyful is not a lymphoblast it does not deplore trait.
sent2 -> int1: the analphabet basks Hazardia.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the analphabet is not non-joyful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the analphabet does bask Hazardia and is joyful is not incorrect.; int3 -> int4: something does bask Hazardia and is joyful.;
the ocean is not a Vaishnavism.
sent12 -> int5: the tinter does not deplore trait if it is joyful and not a lymphoblast.;
$hypothesis$ = the ocean is a Vaishnavism. ; $context$ = sent1: the analphabet deplores trait. sent2: the analphabet does deplore trait and it does bask Hazardia. sent3: that something does not bask Hazardia and it is not joyful is not correct if it is a Vaishnavism. sent4: if the tinter does not deplore trait then the analphabet deplore trait. sent5: there exists something such that it is joyful. sent6: there exists something such that it does bask Hazardia. sent7: if something is not a redistribution then it is a kind of a Vaishnavism and it is a lymphoblast. sent8: the fact that the ocean is not a Vaishnavism is not incorrect if the analphabet is not a Vaishnavism and does not bask Hazardia. sent9: if the fact that the analphabet is not joyful and it is not a redistribution is not true then the fact that it is joyful is not wrong. sent10: that the analphabet is joyful and is not a redistribution is not correct. sent11: the fact that the analphabet is not joyful and it is not a redistribution does not hold. sent12: if something that is joyful is not a lymphoblast it does not deplore trait. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the analphabet basks Hazardia.; sent9 & sent11 -> int2: the analphabet is not non-joyful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the analphabet does bask Hazardia and is joyful is not incorrect.; int3 -> int4: something does bask Hazardia and is joyful.; __UNKNOWN__