the fact that there is something such that if it does tyrannize bannister and is not immunosuppressive then the fact that it is not excretory is true is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it tyrannizes bannister and is immunosuppressive then it is not excretory. sent2: the jabiru is not excretory if it does tyrannize bannister and it is not immunosuppressive. sent3: there exists something such that if it tyrannizes bannister and it is not immunosuppressive then it is excretory. sent4: there exists something such that if it jams spreader and it is not a kaph it does not repine. sent5: if the jabiru does tyrannize bannister and is immunosuppressive it is not excretory. sent6: the fact that something is not a philosophy hold if it is entomological and it does not embrown orangery.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is entomological and it does not embrown orangery then it is not a philosophy.
sent6 -> int1: if the varmint is not non-entomological and does not embrown orangery then it is not a philosophy.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does tyrannize bannister and is not immunosuppressive then the fact that it is not excretory is true is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it tyrannizes bannister and is immunosuppressive then it is not excretory. sent2: the jabiru is not excretory if it does tyrannize bannister and it is not immunosuppressive. sent3: there exists something such that if it tyrannizes bannister and it is not immunosuppressive then it is excretory. sent4: there exists something such that if it jams spreader and it is not a kaph it does not repine. sent5: if the jabiru does tyrannize bannister and is immunosuppressive it is not excretory. sent6: the fact that something is not a philosophy hold if it is entomological and it does not embrown orangery. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__