the fact that there is something such that if it does not pole tablet it is not neurotropic and it is not a decimal is not right.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not pole tablet it is non-neurotropic and is a decimal. sent2: something that is not adjudicative is not maritime and does not mean multi-billionaire. sent3: there is something such that if it is not fossil then it does not clothe. sent4: there is something such that if it does not roar then it is not a featherfoil. sent5: something does not pole cheeseboard and does not gong surrealist if it does not pole tablet. sent6: if the coauthor does not pole tablet then it is non-neurotropic thing that is not a kind of a decimal. sent7: if the coauthor poles tablet then it is not neurotropic and is not a kind of a decimal. sent8: there is something such that if it does not undulate it does not gong Austronesian and is not syncarpous. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not pole tablet then it is a kind of neurotropic thing that is not a kind of a decimal. sent10: there is something such that if it does not pole tablet then it is not a decimal. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it does pole tablet is right it is non-neurotropic thing that is not a kind of a decimal. sent12: if the coauthor does not pole tablet it is neurotropic and is not a decimal.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
if the coauthor does not pole tablet then it does not pole cheeseboard and it does not gong surrealist.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does not pole tablet it is not neurotropic and it is not a decimal is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not pole tablet it is non-neurotropic and is a decimal. sent2: something that is not adjudicative is not maritime and does not mean multi-billionaire. sent3: there is something such that if it is not fossil then it does not clothe. sent4: there is something such that if it does not roar then it is not a featherfoil. sent5: something does not pole cheeseboard and does not gong surrealist if it does not pole tablet. sent6: if the coauthor does not pole tablet then it is non-neurotropic thing that is not a kind of a decimal. sent7: if the coauthor poles tablet then it is not neurotropic and is not a kind of a decimal. sent8: there is something such that if it does not undulate it does not gong Austronesian and is not syncarpous. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not pole tablet then it is a kind of neurotropic thing that is not a kind of a decimal. sent10: there is something such that if it does not pole tablet then it is not a decimal. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it does pole tablet is right it is non-neurotropic thing that is not a kind of a decimal. sent12: if the coauthor does not pole tablet it is neurotropic and is not a decimal. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__