the kopje is not a spoil.
sent1: the sediment is not a spinster if that the maxilla is not a spinster or it does not bark velum or both is false. sent2: if the bittersweet is not a BAR and it does not bark sediment the toxicognath is a kind of a BAR. sent3: that something is a BAR and is not a disconnection is not correct if it is a kind of a bootmaker. sent4: if the toxicognath is not repeatable but it bypasses toe-in then the bittersweet is not a kind of a madnep. sent5: that something is a kind of a bootmaker and/or it is not a ditch is wrong if it is insensible. sent6: a serviceable thing that is not a madnep does not spoil. sent7: the bittersweet is not a spoil. sent8: that the kopje is not unserviceable and is a madnep is false if the toxicognath is a kind of a BAR. sent9: if the bittersweet is not a madnep the kopje spoils. sent10: the denticle is both insensible and adaxial if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Passeridae is right. sent11: if the fact that the denticle is a bootmaker and/or is not a ditch does not hold the bittersweet is a kind of a bootmaker. sent12: if that something is a BAR that is not a disconnection is false it is not a BAR. sent13: that the toxicognath is unrepeatable hold. sent14: the toxicognath is unrepeatable thing that does bypass toe-in. sent15: if the sediment either barks redistribution or is not a kind of a spinster or both then the bittersweet does not bark sediment. sent16: something is not a kind of a spoil if the fact that it is a kind of serviceable thing that is a kind of a madnep is not true. sent17: there is something such that it is not a Passeridae. sent18: if the toxicognath is repeatable thing that bypasses toe-in then the bittersweet is not a kind of a madnep.
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the bittersweet is not a madnep is true.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the kopje is not a spoil.
sent16 -> int2: the kopje is not a spoil if the fact that it is both not unserviceable and a madnep is incorrect.; sent12 -> int3: if that the bittersweet is a BAR but it is not a disconnection is false it is not a BAR.; sent3 -> int4: if the bittersweet is a kind of a bootmaker then that it is a BAR and is not a disconnection is not right.; sent5 -> int5: if the denticle is not sensible then the fact that it is a bootmaker and/or it does not ditch is not correct.; sent17 & sent10 -> int6: the denticle is insensible and is adaxial.; int6 -> int7: the denticle is insensible.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the denticle is a kind of a bootmaker and/or does not ditch is wrong.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the bittersweet is a bootmaker.; int4 & int9 -> int10: that the bittersweet is a BAR but it is not a kind of a disconnection does not hold.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the bittersweet is not a BAR.;
$hypothesis$ = the kopje is not a spoil. ; $context$ = sent1: the sediment is not a spinster if that the maxilla is not a spinster or it does not bark velum or both is false. sent2: if the bittersweet is not a BAR and it does not bark sediment the toxicognath is a kind of a BAR. sent3: that something is a BAR and is not a disconnection is not correct if it is a kind of a bootmaker. sent4: if the toxicognath is not repeatable but it bypasses toe-in then the bittersweet is not a kind of a madnep. sent5: that something is a kind of a bootmaker and/or it is not a ditch is wrong if it is insensible. sent6: a serviceable thing that is not a madnep does not spoil. sent7: the bittersweet is not a spoil. sent8: that the kopje is not unserviceable and is a madnep is false if the toxicognath is a kind of a BAR. sent9: if the bittersweet is not a madnep the kopje spoils. sent10: the denticle is both insensible and adaxial if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Passeridae is right. sent11: if the fact that the denticle is a bootmaker and/or is not a ditch does not hold the bittersweet is a kind of a bootmaker. sent12: if that something is a BAR that is not a disconnection is false it is not a BAR. sent13: that the toxicognath is unrepeatable hold. sent14: the toxicognath is unrepeatable thing that does bypass toe-in. sent15: if the sediment either barks redistribution or is not a kind of a spinster or both then the bittersweet does not bark sediment. sent16: something is not a kind of a spoil if the fact that it is a kind of serviceable thing that is a kind of a madnep is not true. sent17: there is something such that it is not a Passeridae. sent18: if the toxicognath is repeatable thing that bypasses toe-in then the bittersweet is not a kind of a madnep. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the bittersweet is not a madnep is true.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__