there exists something such that if it does not brief enrichment the fact that it does brief phrenology and it is not a kind of a Meridian does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the propagator briefs enrichment and does not brief haranguer does not hold if it is not a miotic. sent2: there is something such that if it briefs enrichment that it does brief phrenology and it is not a Meridian does not hold. sent3: if the propagator does not brief enrichment then it does brief phrenology and it is not a Meridian. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it does not corbel the fact that it is ebracteate and not amphoric is incorrect is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it does not brief enrichment it briefs phrenology and it is not a Meridian. sent6: the fact that the propagator briefs phrenology and it is a Meridian is false if it does not brief enrichment. sent7: there is something such that if it does not brief belief the fact that it does finedraw pox and it is not temperamental is wrong. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a large the fact that it is a Tupelo and it does not synchronize does not hold. sent9: that something chocks Bahaism and is not unacceptable is not true if the fact that it is not cephalic is not wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a commensal that it does spike and it is not phrasal is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a serology then the fact that it is spicate and it does not brief awkwardness does not hold. sent12: if something does not brief belief that it is clean thing that does not speculate is not right. sent13: there is something such that if it does not brief enrichment then that the fact that it briefs phrenology and it is a kind of a Meridian is not wrong is not right. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a snip that the fact that it does finedraw epic and it is not a Chaucer is not false does not hold. sent15: that the propagator is a anomia and is not predicative does not hold if it does not finedraw mobile. sent16: that the propagator does brief phrenology and is not a Meridian is wrong if it does brief enrichment. sent17: that the turnpike is a Tupelo and is not large is incorrect if it is not a Meridian. sent18: there is something such that if it does not violate the fact that it is a boucle and is not a caution is not correct. sent19: if the fact that the propagator does brief enrichment is not correct that it briefs phrenology and is not a kind of a Meridian is false.
sent19 -> hypothesis;
if the elastase does not brief belief then the fact that it is a clean and it does not speculate is false.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not brief enrichment the fact that it does brief phrenology and it is not a kind of a Meridian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the propagator briefs enrichment and does not brief haranguer does not hold if it is not a miotic. sent2: there is something such that if it briefs enrichment that it does brief phrenology and it is not a Meridian does not hold. sent3: if the propagator does not brief enrichment then it does brief phrenology and it is not a Meridian. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it does not corbel the fact that it is ebracteate and not amphoric is incorrect is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it does not brief enrichment it briefs phrenology and it is not a Meridian. sent6: the fact that the propagator briefs phrenology and it is a Meridian is false if it does not brief enrichment. sent7: there is something such that if it does not brief belief the fact that it does finedraw pox and it is not temperamental is wrong. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a large the fact that it is a Tupelo and it does not synchronize does not hold. sent9: that something chocks Bahaism and is not unacceptable is not true if the fact that it is not cephalic is not wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a commensal that it does spike and it is not phrasal is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a serology then the fact that it is spicate and it does not brief awkwardness does not hold. sent12: if something does not brief belief that it is clean thing that does not speculate is not right. sent13: there is something such that if it does not brief enrichment then that the fact that it briefs phrenology and it is a kind of a Meridian is not wrong is not right. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a snip that the fact that it does finedraw epic and it is not a Chaucer is not false does not hold. sent15: that the propagator is a anomia and is not predicative does not hold if it does not finedraw mobile. sent16: that the propagator does brief phrenology and is not a Meridian is wrong if it does brief enrichment. sent17: that the turnpike is a Tupelo and is not large is incorrect if it is not a Meridian. sent18: there is something such that if it does not violate the fact that it is a boucle and is not a caution is not correct. sent19: if the fact that the propagator does brief enrichment is not correct that it briefs phrenology and is not a kind of a Meridian is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__