the specialism occurs.
sent1: if the fact that the demoralizing and the non-sacerdotalness occurs is not right then that the demoralizing does not occur is not false. sent2: the lockout does not occur if the fact that the reaction does not occur and the impaction does not occur is not correct. sent3: the clamoring slash happens. sent4: if the lockout does not occur then the clamoring chrestomathy happens and the sacerdotalness happens. sent5: if the dangling does not occur the puzzling happens but the offertory does not occur. sent6: the basicness does not occur or the unpropheticness does not occur or both if the clamoring filler does not occur. sent7: that both the demoralizing and the non-sacerdotalness happens is not correct if the obliging happens. sent8: if the offertory does not occur then the clamoring filler does not occur but the road occurs. sent9: if the obliging does not occur and/or the sacerdotalness does not occur then the specialism occurs. sent10: the reaction does not occur. sent11: both the obliging and the specialism happens if the clamoring chrestomathy does not occur. sent12: the fact that the reaction does not occur and the impaction does not occur is false if the fact that the accounting happens does not hold. sent13: the dangling does not occur if the fact that the dangling happens and the hockey does not occur is wrong. sent14: the fact that the sacerdotalness does not occur is true. sent15: that the accounting happens is prevented by that the basic does not occur and/or the unpropheticness does not occur.
sent14 -> int1: the obliging does not occur or the sacerdotalness does not occur or both.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the specialism does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the specialism occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the demoralizing and the non-sacerdotalness occurs is not right then that the demoralizing does not occur is not false. sent2: the lockout does not occur if the fact that the reaction does not occur and the impaction does not occur is not correct. sent3: the clamoring slash happens. sent4: if the lockout does not occur then the clamoring chrestomathy happens and the sacerdotalness happens. sent5: if the dangling does not occur the puzzling happens but the offertory does not occur. sent6: the basicness does not occur or the unpropheticness does not occur or both if the clamoring filler does not occur. sent7: that both the demoralizing and the non-sacerdotalness happens is not correct if the obliging happens. sent8: if the offertory does not occur then the clamoring filler does not occur but the road occurs. sent9: if the obliging does not occur and/or the sacerdotalness does not occur then the specialism occurs. sent10: the reaction does not occur. sent11: both the obliging and the specialism happens if the clamoring chrestomathy does not occur. sent12: the fact that the reaction does not occur and the impaction does not occur is false if the fact that the accounting happens does not hold. sent13: the dangling does not occur if the fact that the dangling happens and the hockey does not occur is wrong. sent14: the fact that the sacerdotalness does not occur is true. sent15: that the accounting happens is prevented by that the basic does not occur and/or the unpropheticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the obliging does not occur or the sacerdotalness does not occur or both.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__