the lyre is deductive.
sent1: if the lapidary is not a kind of an immersion it either is deductive or does not luxuriate or both. sent2: something is not deductive or it luxuriates or both. sent3: if the geek is removable then the conodont is not an immersion and does exalt impression. sent4: something does not exalt impression and/or it is not deductive. sent5: there exists something such that it does exalt impression and/or it does not luxuriate. sent6: the lapidary does not exalt impression and/or it does luxuriate. sent7: if the lyre is not lacrimatory and not an immersion the lapidary is not an immersion. sent8: the lyre is not non-deductive if something does not exalt impression or it does not luxuriate or both. sent9: something does not exalt audiovisual and/or it is not nidicolous if it does exalt impression. sent10: there exists something such that it does not exalt impression or it does luxuriate or both. sent11: if that the lapidary does not luxuriate and it does not exalt impression is incorrect then the fact that the lyre is not deductive is not wrong. sent12: either something is not deductive or it does exalt impression or both. sent13: if something is lacrimatory it is not irremovable. sent14: the lyre luxuriates and/or it is not deductive. sent15: the lapidary exalts impression and/or it does not luxuriate.
something does not exalt audiovisual and/or it is not nidicolous.
sent9 -> int1: if the lapidary exalts impression then it does not exalt audiovisual and/or is not nidicolous.;
$hypothesis$ = the lyre is deductive. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lapidary is not a kind of an immersion it either is deductive or does not luxuriate or both. sent2: something is not deductive or it luxuriates or both. sent3: if the geek is removable then the conodont is not an immersion and does exalt impression. sent4: something does not exalt impression and/or it is not deductive. sent5: there exists something such that it does exalt impression and/or it does not luxuriate. sent6: the lapidary does not exalt impression and/or it does luxuriate. sent7: if the lyre is not lacrimatory and not an immersion the lapidary is not an immersion. sent8: the lyre is not non-deductive if something does not exalt impression or it does not luxuriate or both. sent9: something does not exalt audiovisual and/or it is not nidicolous if it does exalt impression. sent10: there exists something such that it does not exalt impression or it does luxuriate or both. sent11: if that the lapidary does not luxuriate and it does not exalt impression is incorrect then the fact that the lyre is not deductive is not wrong. sent12: either something is not deductive or it does exalt impression or both. sent13: if something is lacrimatory it is not irremovable. sent14: the lyre luxuriates and/or it is not deductive. sent15: the lapidary exalts impression and/or it does not luxuriate. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__