the fact that the container does whelp and it is a labiodental is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the Gypsy is not hot and it is not restless is wrong. sent2: the fact that that the condylion trivializes refractometer but it is not seismological is true does not hold. sent3: the target is non-beneficent thing that does not knit Dominion if that the condylion does not knit Dominion does not hold. sent4: the fact that the target does not whelp but it is beneficent is not right. sent5: the target is not argentic if that the Gypsy is both not hot and restful is false. sent6: the target does not knit Dominion if the condylion is not beneficent and it does not trivialize refractometer. sent7: the target is non-beneficent. sent8: the target is not beneficent if the fact that the condylion knits Dominion is correct. sent9: the armorer is not a kind of a labiodental if the target is not beneficent and does not knit Dominion. sent10: that the container whelps is not wrong if something that does not theme Dytiscidae is not maxillary. sent11: if the condylion does trivialize refractometer then it knits Dominion. sent12: the armorer is not a kind of a labiodental if the target is beneficent but it does not knit Dominion. sent13: there is nothing that does trivialize refractometer and is not seismological. sent14: if that the condylion does not trivialize refractometer and it is not seismological does not hold the fact that it does not knit Dominion does not hold. sent15: the target does not theme Dytiscidae and it is not maxillary if the fact that it is non-argentic is correct. sent16: there is nothing such that it does not trivialize refractometer and it is not seismological.
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the condylion does not trivialize refractometer and is non-seismological is not true.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the condylion does knit Dominion.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the target is not beneficent and it does not knit Dominion.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the armorer is not a kind of a labiodental.;
the container does whelp and is a labiodental.
sent5 & sent1 -> int5: the target is not argentic.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: the target does not theme Dytiscidae and it is not maxillary.; int6 -> int7: something does not theme Dytiscidae and it is not maxillary.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the container does whelp.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the container does whelp and it is a labiodental is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Gypsy is not hot and it is not restless is wrong. sent2: the fact that that the condylion trivializes refractometer but it is not seismological is true does not hold. sent3: the target is non-beneficent thing that does not knit Dominion if that the condylion does not knit Dominion does not hold. sent4: the fact that the target does not whelp but it is beneficent is not right. sent5: the target is not argentic if that the Gypsy is both not hot and restful is false. sent6: the target does not knit Dominion if the condylion is not beneficent and it does not trivialize refractometer. sent7: the target is non-beneficent. sent8: the target is not beneficent if the fact that the condylion knits Dominion is correct. sent9: the armorer is not a kind of a labiodental if the target is not beneficent and does not knit Dominion. sent10: that the container whelps is not wrong if something that does not theme Dytiscidae is not maxillary. sent11: if the condylion does trivialize refractometer then it knits Dominion. sent12: the armorer is not a kind of a labiodental if the target is beneficent but it does not knit Dominion. sent13: there is nothing that does trivialize refractometer and is not seismological. sent14: if that the condylion does not trivialize refractometer and it is not seismological does not hold the fact that it does not knit Dominion does not hold. sent15: the target does not theme Dytiscidae and it is not maxillary if the fact that it is non-argentic is correct. sent16: there is nothing such that it does not trivialize refractometer and it is not seismological. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the condylion does not trivialize refractometer and is non-seismological is not true.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the condylion does knit Dominion.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the target is not beneficent and it does not knit Dominion.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the armorer is not a kind of a labiodental.; __UNKNOWN__