the gauntlet does gap.
sent1: if the stethoscope does accord raj then the anti-inflammatory is a Fayetteville. sent2: if the stethoscope does not oppose Eden it is a Fayetteville and/or it does accord raj. sent3: the stethoscope does not oppose Eden. sent4: the stethoscope does flesh. sent5: the fact that the fact that something is not photometric and does not hash fatness is true does not hold if the fact that it does not hash TLC is not incorrect. sent6: that the gauntlet is a kind of an ache is wrong if the monologist is not a kind of a flesh. sent7: if the stethoscope is a kind of a Fayetteville the anti-inflammatory is a Fayetteville. sent8: the gauntlet does not gap if the monologist is a kind of photometric thing that is not a gap. sent9: the gauntlet is not non-photometric and does hash fatness if something does not hash TLC. sent10: the gauntlet is photometric. sent11: there exists something such that it does not hash TLC. sent12: if something is hemiparasitic but it does not gap then it does not hash TLC. sent13: there is something such that it hashes TLC. sent14: the gauntlet is photometric if there exists something such that it does not hash TLC. sent15: the evangelist is photometric if that the gauntlet is not photometric and does not hash fatness is false. sent16: if the stethoscope fleshes the monologist is hemiparasitic. sent17: if something is hemiparasitic then it is photometric. sent18: something is hemiparasitic thing that is not a gap if it is not an ache. sent19: that the anti-inflammatory does accord plasmacyte and is a Pacific hold if it does not accord guardroom.
sent11 & sent9 -> int1: the gauntlet is not non-photometric and it hashes fatness.; int1 -> int2: the gauntlet hashes fatness.;
the evangelist is photometric.
sent5 -> int3: if the gauntlet does not hash TLC the fact that it is not photometric and it does not hash fatness is not true.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the gauntlet is hemiparasitic but not a gap is right then that it does not hash TLC is correct.; sent18 -> int5: the gauntlet is hemiparasitic but not a gap if it does not ache.; sent2 & sent3 -> int6: the stethoscope is a Fayetteville or accords raj or both.; int6 & sent7 & sent1 -> int7: the anti-inflammatory is a Fayetteville.;
$hypothesis$ = the gauntlet does gap. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stethoscope does accord raj then the anti-inflammatory is a Fayetteville. sent2: if the stethoscope does not oppose Eden it is a Fayetteville and/or it does accord raj. sent3: the stethoscope does not oppose Eden. sent4: the stethoscope does flesh. sent5: the fact that the fact that something is not photometric and does not hash fatness is true does not hold if the fact that it does not hash TLC is not incorrect. sent6: that the gauntlet is a kind of an ache is wrong if the monologist is not a kind of a flesh. sent7: if the stethoscope is a kind of a Fayetteville the anti-inflammatory is a Fayetteville. sent8: the gauntlet does not gap if the monologist is a kind of photometric thing that is not a gap. sent9: the gauntlet is not non-photometric and does hash fatness if something does not hash TLC. sent10: the gauntlet is photometric. sent11: there exists something such that it does not hash TLC. sent12: if something is hemiparasitic but it does not gap then it does not hash TLC. sent13: there is something such that it hashes TLC. sent14: the gauntlet is photometric if there exists something such that it does not hash TLC. sent15: the evangelist is photometric if that the gauntlet is not photometric and does not hash fatness is false. sent16: if the stethoscope fleshes the monologist is hemiparasitic. sent17: if something is hemiparasitic then it is photometric. sent18: something is hemiparasitic thing that is not a gap if it is not an ache. sent19: that the anti-inflammatory does accord plasmacyte and is a Pacific hold if it does not accord guardroom. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent9 -> int1: the gauntlet is not non-photometric and it hashes fatness.; int1 -> int2: the gauntlet hashes fatness.; __UNKNOWN__