that the mussel is not a bluetick or a soaring or both does not hold.
sent1: either something is not a kind of a bluetick or it does soar or both if it is not a EDS. sent2: if the mussel is not lobate and it is not an accessory it is not neuroendocrine. sent3: the monoplane is a mace. sent4: the phrenologist is a mace. sent5: if the Brie is a kind of a bluetick then it nettles patchwork. sent6: the fact that something is not neuroendocrine but it is a kind of an endocrine is not true if it does soar. sent7: if something is a soaring then it is a faultlessness. sent8: if the occlusion does disobey thuggery the fact that the intaglio is an endocrine hold. sent9: the mussel does not parch rockabilly if it is not a faultlessness. sent10: the mussel is not a kind of a faultlessness if the fact that it is not a mace and it disobeys thuggery is incorrect. sent11: if the occlusion is a kind of a mace then the intaglio is not non-endocrine. sent12: the freestone does not parch rockabilly. sent13: if the mussel does not parch rockabilly the fact that it is not a bluetick and/or it is a soaring does not hold. sent14: something is an endocrine if it is avuncular. sent15: that the patchwork constellates is not wrong if it is not a EDS. sent16: if the mussel is not neuroendocrine then it is a EDS. sent17: if something is not non-endocrine it is avuncular. sent18: the mussel is not lobate and it is not an accessory. sent19: the mussel does not soar if it does not parch rockabilly. sent20: the mussel is not a kind of an accessory. sent21: the mussel is not an accessory if it is not plumbic. sent22: if something is a mace then the occlusion either is a mace or does disobey thuggery or both. sent23: a EDS is avuncular. sent24: the mussel is not a EDS and not neuroendocrine if the intaglio is not avuncular. sent25: the mussel is not apoplectiform.
sent2 & sent18 -> int1: the mussel is non-neuroendocrine.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the mussel is a kind of a EDS is right.; sent23 -> int3: the mussel is avuncular if it is a EDS.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the mussel is avuncular.; sent14 -> int5: the mussel is not non-endocrine if it is avuncular.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the mussel is a kind of an endocrine.;
the mussel is either not a bluetick or a soaring or both.
sent1 -> int7: if the mussel is not a EDS then it is not a bluetick and/or is a soaring.; sent17 -> int8: if the intaglio is a kind of an endocrine then it is not non-avuncular.; sent4 -> int9: there is something such that it is a mace.; int9 & sent22 -> int10: the occlusion is a mace and/or it disobeys thuggery.; int10 & sent11 & sent8 -> int11: the intaglio is endocrine.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the intaglio is avuncular.; int12 -> int13: something is avuncular.;
$hypothesis$ = that the mussel is not a bluetick or a soaring or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: either something is not a kind of a bluetick or it does soar or both if it is not a EDS. sent2: if the mussel is not lobate and it is not an accessory it is not neuroendocrine. sent3: the monoplane is a mace. sent4: the phrenologist is a mace. sent5: if the Brie is a kind of a bluetick then it nettles patchwork. sent6: the fact that something is not neuroendocrine but it is a kind of an endocrine is not true if it does soar. sent7: if something is a soaring then it is a faultlessness. sent8: if the occlusion does disobey thuggery the fact that the intaglio is an endocrine hold. sent9: the mussel does not parch rockabilly if it is not a faultlessness. sent10: the mussel is not a kind of a faultlessness if the fact that it is not a mace and it disobeys thuggery is incorrect. sent11: if the occlusion is a kind of a mace then the intaglio is not non-endocrine. sent12: the freestone does not parch rockabilly. sent13: if the mussel does not parch rockabilly the fact that it is not a bluetick and/or it is a soaring does not hold. sent14: something is an endocrine if it is avuncular. sent15: that the patchwork constellates is not wrong if it is not a EDS. sent16: if the mussel is not neuroendocrine then it is a EDS. sent17: if something is not non-endocrine it is avuncular. sent18: the mussel is not lobate and it is not an accessory. sent19: the mussel does not soar if it does not parch rockabilly. sent20: the mussel is not a kind of an accessory. sent21: the mussel is not an accessory if it is not plumbic. sent22: if something is a mace then the occlusion either is a mace or does disobey thuggery or both. sent23: a EDS is avuncular. sent24: the mussel is not a EDS and not neuroendocrine if the intaglio is not avuncular. sent25: the mussel is not apoplectiform. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent18 -> int1: the mussel is non-neuroendocrine.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the mussel is a kind of a EDS is right.; sent23 -> int3: the mussel is avuncular if it is a EDS.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the mussel is avuncular.; sent14 -> int5: the mussel is not non-endocrine if it is avuncular.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the mussel is a kind of an endocrine.; __UNKNOWN__