the stainless cards.
sent1: something does not interfere catananche and is not a lasting. sent2: something cards if it is not non-linguistics. sent3: the maillot is not a cybernaut if the fact that it is a cybernaut and it is not parietal is not true. sent4: That the theca does not dwarf hematochrome is not wrong. sent5: if the maillot is a grits the fact that it is a cybernaut and is not parietal is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that it dwarfs theca and it is not a rubel. sent7: the maillot is a kind of a grits if it uplifts hastiness and it is not downtown. sent8: the maillot uplifts hastiness and is non-downtown. sent9: if there exists something such that it does not dwarf theca and it is not a rubel that the stainless is linguistics is not incorrect. sent10: the hematochrome is a factor if the maillot is not a cybernaut. sent11: if something is a factor then it is linguistics. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not dwarf theca is true. sent13: that the hematochrome does not dwarf theca is not wrong. sent14: the hematochrome is not a rubel. sent15: there is something such that it does not dwarf theca and it is a rubel. sent16: there is something such that it is not a rubel.
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the hematochrome does not dwarf theca and it is not a rubel.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not dwarf theca and it is not a kind of a rubel.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the stainless is linguistics is correct.; sent2 -> int4: the stainless is a kind of a cards if it is linguistics.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the stainless is not a cards.
sent11 -> int5: the hematochrome is linguistics if it is a kind of a factor.; sent7 & sent8 -> int6: the maillot is a grits.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: that the maillot is a cybernaut and is not parietal does not hold.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the maillot is not a cybernaut.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the hematochrome factors.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the hematochrome is linguistics.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is linguistics.;
$hypothesis$ = the stainless cards. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not interfere catananche and is not a lasting. sent2: something cards if it is not non-linguistics. sent3: the maillot is not a cybernaut if the fact that it is a cybernaut and it is not parietal is not true. sent4: That the theca does not dwarf hematochrome is not wrong. sent5: if the maillot is a grits the fact that it is a cybernaut and is not parietal is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that it dwarfs theca and it is not a rubel. sent7: the maillot is a kind of a grits if it uplifts hastiness and it is not downtown. sent8: the maillot uplifts hastiness and is non-downtown. sent9: if there exists something such that it does not dwarf theca and it is not a rubel that the stainless is linguistics is not incorrect. sent10: the hematochrome is a factor if the maillot is not a cybernaut. sent11: if something is a factor then it is linguistics. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not dwarf theca is true. sent13: that the hematochrome does not dwarf theca is not wrong. sent14: the hematochrome is not a rubel. sent15: there is something such that it does not dwarf theca and it is a rubel. sent16: there is something such that it is not a rubel. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the hematochrome does not dwarf theca and it is not a rubel.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does not dwarf theca and it is not a kind of a rubel.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the stainless is linguistics is correct.; sent2 -> int4: the stainless is a kind of a cards if it is linguistics.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__