the fact that the enfranchising Aleyrodidae does not occur is true.
sent1: the fact that the enfranchising Aleyrodidae and the likeness occurs is not true if the interruption does not occur. sent2: if the repining Acrostichum occurs then the enfranchising Aleyrodidae does not occur. sent3: that the interruption does not occur hold if the funeral does not occur. sent4: if the crutch happens and the antagonisticness happens then the luffing does not occur. sent5: either that the antagonisticness does not occur or that the karma happens or both leads to that the repining Acrostichum happens. sent6: both the anti and the crutch happens if the immeasurableness does not occur. sent7: the likeness occurs. sent8: either the antagonisticness or the karma or both happens. sent9: the immeasurableness happens. sent10: if that the leaning VAT occurs hold the fact that not the antagonisticness but the luff happens does not hold. sent11: the leaning VAT does not occur. sent12: the crutch and the immeasurableness happens.
sent12 -> int1: the crutch occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antagonisticness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the crutch occurs and the antagonisticness happens is not incorrect.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the luff does not occur.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the luff does not occur and the leaning VAT does not occur.;
the antiness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the enfranchising Aleyrodidae does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the enfranchising Aleyrodidae and the likeness occurs is not true if the interruption does not occur. sent2: if the repining Acrostichum occurs then the enfranchising Aleyrodidae does not occur. sent3: that the interruption does not occur hold if the funeral does not occur. sent4: if the crutch happens and the antagonisticness happens then the luffing does not occur. sent5: either that the antagonisticness does not occur or that the karma happens or both leads to that the repining Acrostichum happens. sent6: both the anti and the crutch happens if the immeasurableness does not occur. sent7: the likeness occurs. sent8: either the antagonisticness or the karma or both happens. sent9: the immeasurableness happens. sent10: if that the leaning VAT occurs hold the fact that not the antagonisticness but the luff happens does not hold. sent11: the leaning VAT does not occur. sent12: the crutch and the immeasurableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the crutch occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antagonisticness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the crutch occurs and the antagonisticness happens is not incorrect.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the luff does not occur.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the luff does not occur and the leaning VAT does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__