the fact that that the leaflessness does not occur leads to that the extinguishing poodle does not occur is not correct.
sent1: the fact that both the extinguishing poodle and the leaflessness occurs does not hold. sent2: the Somerset does not occur. sent3: the thinking does not occur. sent4: the nonimitativeness occurs and the circling does not occur. sent5: the non-leaflessness and/or the extinguishing poodle prevents that the fixture does not occur. sent6: if the leaflessness does not occur the extinguishing poodle occurs. sent7: the fact that the leaflessness does not occur or the extinguishing poodle occurs or both if the nonimitativeness does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: the colostomy but not the striping happens. sent9: the extinguishing poodle does not occur if the leaflessness occurs. sent10: the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the nonimitativeness but not the four-hitter occurs is incorrect. sent12: that the fact that the extinguishing poodle and the non-leaflessness happens is not wrong is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extinguishing poodle happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the leaflessness does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the extinguishing poodle and the non-leaflessness happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the extinguishing poodle does not occur.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fixture happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the leaflessness does not occur leads to that the extinguishing poodle does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the extinguishing poodle and the leaflessness occurs does not hold. sent2: the Somerset does not occur. sent3: the thinking does not occur. sent4: the nonimitativeness occurs and the circling does not occur. sent5: the non-leaflessness and/or the extinguishing poodle prevents that the fixture does not occur. sent6: if the leaflessness does not occur the extinguishing poodle occurs. sent7: the fact that the leaflessness does not occur or the extinguishing poodle occurs or both if the nonimitativeness does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: the colostomy but not the striping happens. sent9: the extinguishing poodle does not occur if the leaflessness occurs. sent10: the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent11: the fact that the nonimitativeness but not the four-hitter occurs is incorrect. sent12: that the fact that the extinguishing poodle and the non-leaflessness happens is not wrong is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extinguishing poodle happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the leaflessness does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the extinguishing poodle and the non-leaflessness happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the extinguishing poodle does not occur.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__