the fact that the extraction does extend Waco and it is the penitent if the extraction does not disoblige is not true.
sent1: if the Poivrade is not an arcade and is not a milt the extraction does not slime nekton. sent2: the Poivrade is not an arcade if the fact that the endive is not a milt is not wrong. sent3: if something does not slime nekton and does not disoblige it is a kind of a penitent. sent4: if the Swazi is an arcade it is a kind of a attestation. sent5: if the endive is not a milt then the Poivrade is both not an arcade and not a milt. sent6: the mount is an arcade and/or does underwrite outfitting. sent7: if something that does not slime nekton does disoblige then it is not impenitent. sent8: if the mount is an arcade the Swazi is a kind of an arcade. sent9: if the extraction is semantic then it does extend Waco. sent10: the Poivrade is not a kingship and it is not disobedient. sent11: the extraction is semantic. sent12: the cesium is not disobedient. sent13: the endive is not a Herero. sent14: the extraction does not slime nekton if the Poivrade is an arcade but it is not a milt. sent15: the endive is disobedient but not a Herero. sent16: something is not a milt if it is disobedient and it is a Herero. sent17: if something that is disobedient is not a kind of a Herero then it is not a milt. sent18: the endive is not a kind of a milt if it is disobedient and a Herero. sent19: the fact that the extraction is a penitent hold if it does not slime nekton and disobliges. sent20: the Poivrade does not extend Waco and is not a milt if the extraction is not a milt. sent21: the Poivrade is not a kind of an arcade. sent22: the extraction extends Waco and it is a penitent if it does disoblige. sent23: if the mount underwrites outfitting then that the Swazi is a kind of an arcade is right. sent24: if that the endive is disobedient is not wrong the fact that it is a penitent is not wrong. sent25: the endive does not slime nekton and is not a Herero. sent26: if something does not extend Waco and is not an arcade then the fact that it is a Herero is true. sent27: the extraction is an arcade but it is not undynamic.
sent17 -> int1: the endive is not a milt if it is a kind of disobedient thing that is not a Herero.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the endive is not a kind of a milt.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Poivrade is not an arcade and not a milt.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the extraction does not slime nekton.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extraction does not disoblige.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the extraction does not slime nekton and it does not disoblige.; sent3 -> int6: if the extraction does not slime nekton and it does not disoblige it is a penitent.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the extraction is penitent.; sent9 & sent11 -> int8: the extraction extends Waco.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the extraction extends Waco and is a penitent.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the Swazi is a attestation and it is a Herero.
sent6 & sent8 & sent23 -> int10: the Swazi is an arcade.; sent4 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the Swazi is not a attestation is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the extraction does extend Waco and it is the penitent if the extraction does not disoblige is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Poivrade is not an arcade and is not a milt the extraction does not slime nekton. sent2: the Poivrade is not an arcade if the fact that the endive is not a milt is not wrong. sent3: if something does not slime nekton and does not disoblige it is a kind of a penitent. sent4: if the Swazi is an arcade it is a kind of a attestation. sent5: if the endive is not a milt then the Poivrade is both not an arcade and not a milt. sent6: the mount is an arcade and/or does underwrite outfitting. sent7: if something that does not slime nekton does disoblige then it is not impenitent. sent8: if the mount is an arcade the Swazi is a kind of an arcade. sent9: if the extraction is semantic then it does extend Waco. sent10: the Poivrade is not a kingship and it is not disobedient. sent11: the extraction is semantic. sent12: the cesium is not disobedient. sent13: the endive is not a Herero. sent14: the extraction does not slime nekton if the Poivrade is an arcade but it is not a milt. sent15: the endive is disobedient but not a Herero. sent16: something is not a milt if it is disobedient and it is a Herero. sent17: if something that is disobedient is not a kind of a Herero then it is not a milt. sent18: the endive is not a kind of a milt if it is disobedient and a Herero. sent19: the fact that the extraction is a penitent hold if it does not slime nekton and disobliges. sent20: the Poivrade does not extend Waco and is not a milt if the extraction is not a milt. sent21: the Poivrade is not a kind of an arcade. sent22: the extraction extends Waco and it is a penitent if it does disoblige. sent23: if the mount underwrites outfitting then that the Swazi is a kind of an arcade is right. sent24: if that the endive is disobedient is not wrong the fact that it is a penitent is not wrong. sent25: the endive does not slime nekton and is not a Herero. sent26: if something does not extend Waco and is not an arcade then the fact that it is a Herero is true. sent27: the extraction is an arcade but it is not undynamic. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the endive is not a milt if it is a kind of disobedient thing that is not a Herero.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the endive is not a kind of a milt.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Poivrade is not an arcade and not a milt.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the extraction does not slime nekton.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the extraction does not disoblige.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the extraction does not slime nekton and it does not disoblige.; sent3 -> int6: if the extraction does not slime nekton and it does not disoblige it is a penitent.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the extraction is penitent.; sent9 & sent11 -> int8: the extraction extends Waco.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the extraction extends Waco and is a penitent.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__